Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2022-06-16 Info Packet4144,rimemoctimir CITY IOWA CITY www.icgov.org City Council Information Packet June 16, 2022 IP1. Council Tentative Meeting Schedule June 21 Work Session IP2. Work Session Agenda IP Iowa City Recreation Facilities & Programs Master Plan IP3. Pending City Council Work Session Topics Miscellaneous IP4. Memo from Neighborhood Services Coordinator - ARPA Nonprofit Operating Fund Round IP5. 2022 Building Statistics - May IP6. Civil Service Examination: Animal Services Officer IP7. CMI Service Examination: Maintenance Worker II - Water Distribution Draft Minutes IP8. Ad Hoc Truth & Reconciliation Commission: June 2 IP9. Board of Adjustment: June 8 r 1 Eicapaat CITY OE IOWA CITY �www.icgov.org City Council Information Pa et IP1. CaLncil Tentative Meeting Schedule June 21 Work Session IP2. Work Sessi. n Agenda IP3. Pending City • ouncil Work Session Topics Miscellan us e 16, 2022 IP4. Memo from Neighbo ood Services f oordinator - ARPA Nonprofit Operating Fund Round IP5. 2022 Building Statistics - ' ay IP6. Civil Service Examination: A al Services Officer IP7. Civil Service Examination- ain -nance Worker II - Water Distribution Draft i n utes IP8. Ad Hoc Truth & ' conciliation Commis ion: June 2 IP9. Board ofAdju ment: June 8 Item Number: 1. J une 16, 2022 Council Ten tative Meeting Sched u l e AT TAC HM E NT S : Description Council Tentative Meeting S chedule City Council Tentative Meeting Schedule Subject to change June 16, 2022 Date Time Meeting Location Tuesday, June 21, 2022 4:00 PM Work Session City Hall, Emma J. Harvat Hall 6:00 PM Formal Meeting 410 E. Washington Street Tuesday, July 12, 2022 4:00 PM Special Formal Executive Session City Hall, Emma J. Harvat Hall Work Session 410 E. Washington Street 6:00 PM Formal Meeting Monday, July 18, 2022 4:30 PM Joint Entities Meeting TBD Hosted by City of Coralville Tuesday, August 2, 2022 4:00 PM Work Session City Hall, Emma J. Harvat Hall 6:00 PM Formal Meeting 410 E. Washington Street Tuesday, August 16, 2022 4:00 PM Work Session City Hall, Emma J. Harvat Hall 6:00 PM Formal Meeting 410 E. Washington Street Tuesday, September 6, 2022 4:00 PM Work Session City Hall, Emma J. Harvat Hall 6:00 PM Formal Meeting 410 E. Washington Street Tuesday, September 20, 2022 4:00 PM Work Session City Hall, Emma J. Harvat Hall 6:00 PM Formal Meeting 410 E. Washington Street Monday, October 3, 2022 4:00 PM Work Session City Hall, Emma J. Harvat Hall 6:00 PM Formal Meeting 410 E. Washington Street Monday, October 17, 2022 4:30 PM Joint Entities Meeting City Hall, Emma J. Harvat Hall Hosted by City of Iowa City 410 E. Washington Street Tuesday, October 18, 2022 4:00 PM Work Session City Hall, Emma J. Harvat Hall 6:00 PM Formal Meeting 410 E. Washington Street Tuesday, November 1, 2022 4:00 PM Work Session City Hall, Emma J. Harvat Hall 6:00 PM Formal Meeting 410 E. Washington Street Tuesday, November 15, 2022 4:00 PM Work Session City Hall, Emma J. Harvat Hall 6:00 PM Formal Meeting 410 E. Washington Street Tuesday, December 6, 2022 4:00 PM Work Session City Hall, Emma J. Harvat Hall 6:00 PM Formal Meeting 410 E. Washington Street Item Number: 2. J une 16, 2022 Work Session Agen d a AT TAC HM E NT S : Description Work Session Agenda Item Number: 3. J une 16, 2022 Pen d ing City Cou n cil Work Session Topics AT TAC HM E NT S : Description Pending City Council Work S ession Topics PENDING CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION TOPICS June 16, 2022 Other Topics: 1. Consider a plan for rubberized surfacing at park playgrounds and develop strategies to address equity gaps noted in the Parks Master Plan and plan for the equitable distribution of destination parks within an easy and safe distance of all residents. 2. Discuss possible changes to residential zoning classifications to allow and/or require a greater diversity of housing types (i.e. missing middle) 3. Consider establishing a cost of development framework that can help guide decisions on how best to accommodate future growth 4. Review low-income fare free transit options 5. Review Sunday transit service operational proposal 6. Discuss low-intensity commercial use allowances in residential zones 7. Discuss long-term planning work group priorities 8. Discuss Local Option Sales Tax 9. Discuss a land acknowledgement for City Council meetings 10. Strategic Planning sessions Item Number: 4. J une 16, 2022 Memo from Neig h b orhood Services Coord inator - AR PA Nonprofit O p eratin g F u n d Rou n d AT TAC HM E NT S : Description Memo from Neighborhood S ervices Coordinator - A R PA Nonprofit Operating Fund Round Date: June 14, 2022 To: Geoff Fruin, City Manager From: Erika Kubly, Neighborhood Services Coordinator Re: ARPA Nonprofit Operating Funding Round Introduction City Council has developed guiding principles to prioritize use of American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funds as well as various programs to meet emergent needs and strategic investments. Because many nonprofits continue to experience financial pressures, increased demand for services, and a shortage of staff and volunteers, the city has allocated ARPA funds for nonprofit pandemic recovery. Staff plans to hold a competitive funding round for nonprofit agencies to apply for ARPA funds to meet community need based on the parameters in this memo. Background In March 2021, President Biden signed the American Rescue Plan Action (ARPA) into law. This legislation established the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund (SLFRF), which provides significant resources to state, local, territorial, and Tribal governments to address impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic. Through this law, the U.S. Treasury has allocated $18.3 million to the City of Iowa City. SLFRF dollars are intended to both address emergency stabilization needs and help localities make long-term, transformative investments through careful planning and extensive public input. Funding Allocation Staff feels that an allocation process similar to the CDBG-CV funding rounds completed in 2020 would be appropriate for ARPA nonprofit recovery funds. Available Funding Staff recommends that $400,000 in funds be allocated for this assistance program. Qualifying projects must be within the City of Iowa City. These funds, combined with the Council’s previous commitment of $85,000 for the Center for Worker Justice wage theft recovery program will bring the total ARPA non- profit operating funding assistance in line with original targets established in September of 2021. Eligible Activities Funding may be used for public service activities serving low- and moderate-income (LMI) residents of Iowa City including advocacy, case management, referrals, service coordination, education, counseling, legal assistance, and funding for staff to implement these activities. Funded activities must be related pandemic recovery, economic impacts, or services to disproportionate communities. Projects must also meet one of the following priority categories: • Homelessness assistance or housing stabilization • Child care and youth services • Health care including mental health services • Food assistance Application Timeline An online application will be made available to interested agencies at the end of June with a due date in mid-July. While there is some flexibility with the timeline, it would be ideal to have the funding round completed prior to the United Way joint funding process (Aid to Agencies) which typically starts at the end of August. June 15, 2022 Page 2 Expenses incurred after March 3, 2021 and future expenses would be eligible. Projects would be awarded one-time funding. However, agencies may apply to receive funding over multiple years through December 2024. Application Review Applications for Iowa City ARPA nonprofit operating projects will be reviewed by City Staff based on project eligibility under ARPA, project need (as it relates to pandemic recovery), agency capacity, readiness to proceed, community collaboration, population served, and program budget. Similar to the previously administered CDBG-CV grant program that prioritized expediency, staff intends to bring our recommendations directly to City Council for consideration and adoption. Item Number: 5. J une 16, 2022 2022 Bu ildin g Statistics - May AT TAC HM E NT S : Description 2022 B uilding Statistics - May Item Number: 6. J une 16, 2022 Civil Service Examin ation : Animal Services O fficer AT TAC HM E NT S : Description Civil S ervice E xamination: A nimal Services Officer Item Number: 7. J une 16, 2022 Civil Service Examin ation : Main ten ance Worker II - Water Distribution AT TAC HM E NT S : Description Civil S ervice E xamination: Maintenance Worker I I - Water Distribution Item Number: 8. J une 16, 2022 Ad Hoc Truth & Recon ciliation Commission: Ju n e 2 AT TAC HM E NT S : Description Ad Hoc Truth & Reconciliation Commission: J une 2 Item Number: 9. J une 16, 2022 Board of Ad j u stmen t: Ju n e 8 AT TAC HM E NT S : Description Board of Adjustment: J une 8 lP Late Handouts Distributed City of Iowa City, Iowa Gather Here Recreation Facilities & Programs Master Plan City Council Presentation n n WILLIAMS 6-1\wrGroup b B e r r y D u ARCHITECTSIAQJATIC5 5 0 T H A N IVERSARY June 21, 2022 HITCHCOCK DESIGN GROUP�� crec,ingbesi e r place's Agenda 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 b Welcome The Process Community Engagement Feedback Recreation Program Assessment Outdoor Facility Assessment Indoor Facility Assessments Next Steps Your Team Barbara Heller Engagement Manager Dannie Wilson Project Manager Frank Parisi Managing Architect WILLIAMS ARCHITECTS/AQUA. 1Q� Architecture i .'luru.ny Aquatics 1 Interiors ,. sia Barbara Heller Subject Matter Expert Rich Klarck John N. McGovern Managing Architect Lead ADA Consultant "create a roadmap for future recreation programs, aquatic facilities, indoor recreation space, and outdoor athletic/specialty use areas" Shelley Zuniga ADA Consultant SI croup SOTH ANNIVERSARY Eric Hornig Bridget Deatrick Oversight and Communications Lead Associate Design HITCHCOCK DESIGN GROUP crealiingbelterplace's The Process GATHER HERE. b Engage • Staff, Board • Community M Assess • Recreation Centers • Pools • ADA • Outdoor Facilities • Programs Envision Plan • Community • Workshops • Action Plan • Report Influencing Factors Equity Access Climate change Worker shortage Nationwide lifeguard shortage Innovation in operational efficiencies Post -pandemic desire for larger indoor spaces b1 Community Enaaaement Community Engagement Sh Y*n � Ij ae b Mercer Park Aquatic Center & Scanlon Gym City Park Pool Robert A. Lee Community Recreation Center Athletic Fields Over the next several months Iowa City Recreation will be gathering input from residents online and in person. The feedback will be used to inform and develop the Gather Here Recreation Master Plan. You are invited to discuss how we can maximize our facilities and programs to better serve you. your neighbors. your family. and your community. ub is ln• ut Oppartunitie September 9/12 Upper City Park 9/19 Willow Creek Park 9/26 Mercer Park October 10/3 10/10 10/17 10/24 10/31 Fairmeadows Park Hunters Run Park Wetherby Park Scott Park Happy Hollow(een) Park Community Engagement Summary Phase 1 Phase 2 b Engagement Type Participants Focus groups (10) 44 Event pop-up booths (13) 299 Statistically valid survey [+/- 4.6] 450 Public survey 216 Community engagement website 642 Engagement Type Participants Open houses (2), P&R Commission Mtg. 40+ Community engagement website 344 Emails to City staff 11 Initial - community sentiment Follow-up based on analysis & Phase 1 findings Top Investment Priorities ETC Statistically Valid Survey Re _ center a enities • Indoor walking/jogging track (200) • Weight room (102) • Fitness room (93) • Meditation/Yoga studio (93) Recreation programming • Adult fitness and wellness programs (174) • Nature programs (130) • Farmers Market (124) • Adult art classes (80) D Outdoor pool amenities • Shade areas (192) • Lazy river (162) • Deck chairs (154) • Lap lanes (135) Pool Programs • Water fitness classes/water aerobics (190) • Lap swimming (168) • Senior aquatic programs (158) • Swim lessons (157) ETC Institute's Priority Investment Rating (PIR) reflects the importance that respondents place on items and their unmet needs. City Park Pool Renovation Combined results from all Phase 1 engagement: Method A: Renovate with same layout a B: Design a new pool layout Statistically Valid Survey 17.3% 67.1% Events 32.7% 63.2% Online 45.9% 40.5% Focus Groups 47.6% 52.4% Average % 35.9% 55.8% b High Level Community Engagement Themes b1 City Park Pool renovation acceptance • It is time for repair, despite varied ideas Fitness and wellness unmet needs • Indoor track, programs, adult -specific High value on aquatics • Aqua fitness, lap lanes, instruction Special interest user group opinions • Pickleball, aqua fitness, lap swim Farmers Market support • Beloved across engagement methods Future program ide. • Comprehensive list generated Athletic field responses • Public needed more information Recreation Assessment What is a Recreation Assessment? The exploration of a department's recreation programs and services through a series of analyses that identify: • What the department is doing well • Strengthening opportunities • Growth opportunities • Performance measures • Alignment with community need b Core Programs ✓ Adult Recreation ✓ Aquatics ✓ Camps/Days Off ✓ Events ✓ Fitness/Wellness ✓ Inclusive & Adaptive Recreation ✓ Outdoor Education ✓ STEAM ✓ Youth Sports b 2019 Program Distribution Adult Recreation Inclusive & 2.4% Adaptive Rec_ 4.1% Outdoor Education 5.7%N Camps/Days Off 5.7% Events 1.3% Fitness/Wellness 1.2% 5,678 Total Programs i 1 1 Participation: Enrollment Outdoor Education 2.6% 2019 Enrollment Adult Recreation 2.0% Fitness/Wellness 0.7% STEAM 8.5% Aquatics 25.8% Camps/Days 9.1% Events 14.0% Youth Sports 19.4% bl Inclusive & Adaptive Rec 18.0% 3,000 2,500 2,000 1,500 1,000 500 0 2019 Enrollment by Season 1 1 fl \5co cooo 0Q -ea oc\ ot ��(\o cil z Pge t. Joao `�a co 0 • ��� .c • Winter/Spring 2019 ■ Summer 2019 Fall 2019 1 .§s yo Participant Reach, 2019 b :•i' :i1 jiitlar4 -Mlle _ -"I`I •Tiiiio uiF Ir i i `.. .ex.E7 W� LI DEI Outcomes Assessment Staff self-assessment, rating of 1-4 according to a scoring rubric Adult Recreation Aquatics Camps/Days Events Fitness/Wellness Inclusive & Adaptive Rec. Outdoor Education STEAM Youth S. 'rts • bl Detail EQUITY DIVERSIT INCLUSION 1 o¢ \ O o o ` (° F Sv k c y N. g %) m4 0� ,Sr �° �,A \A me ii '�°� �'cC .� co b0 m �� „ a s i. s ��' o C2 47 .5 6' '4., ``.e i CO 0 $ ,ae 7 44 a Q Jc Q' 1.1 2.7 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.2 3.0 1.3 1.5 3.6 3.0 4.0 4.0 3.5 3.8 4.0 4.0 4.0 1.3 2.8 1.3 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.8 1.8 3.3 3.0 3.8 3.2 4.0 2.1 4.0 4.0 2.2 Average Rating 1.5 3.8 1.5 3.3 2.3 2.4 3.3 3.8 3.0 3.7 3.0 3.0 1.2 1.8 1.0 3.0 2.7 2.0 1.4 2.5 3.0 1.9 2.4 1.1 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 20 2.0 2.0 2.8 2.1 1.9 2.1 2.1 4.0 4.0 2.0 4.0 2.0 2.5 2.8 1.9 2.0 3.0 2.1 2.5 4.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 2.5 3.8 3.2 2.5 2.1 3.0 3.0 2.0 2.8 2.7 2.7 Summary EQUITY =RSITY INCLUSION Adult Recreation' 2.3' 2.2' 2.0 Aquatics2.9' 2.5' 2.3' 2.4 2.0' 3.3' 2.8' 2.4' Camps/Days Off" Events' Fitness/Wellness' Inclusive & Adaptive Rec. Outdoor Education STEAM' Youth Sports' 1.5' 2.8' 2.8 2.3' 2.4' 2.5' 2.7' 2.2 3.6 3.1 2.3 3.4 2.7 2.8 1.7 2.6 2.5 2.3 2.7 Youth Sports Redefine Opportunity Connection to Engagement Results Adult Fitness and Wellness Growth 0 • •ortunl • 10,944 households asked for more • 1.2% of program menu • 22.4% of in-person event respondents were interested b Inclusive & Adaptive Recreation Growth Opportunity • 16% of survey respondents indicated a need • 2,566 households asked for more • Top -3 program enrollment (1,815) • Minimal similar providers Aquatic Program Growth Opportunity • 75% of "high priority" pool programs involve forms of aquatic exercise • 45% of survey respondents indicated a need • 13% survey respondents listed youth learn to swim programs as one of top four most important • Few community- based providers • 10.7% of event respondents were interested • 8% survey respondents listed as one of top four most important • Most of survey respondents needs were met (63%) • 13.7% of program menu • Some community- based providers I<ey Programming Opportunities b Program Categories • Fitness/Wellness • Adult (young adult, adult, and active adult) • Inclusive & Adaptive expansion (inclusion aide service, adult services) • Aquatic Exercise • Teens • Culture Supporting Facility Spaces • Fitness and wellness spaces • Indoor walking/jogging track, weight room, and fitness room • Room with Inclusive & Adaptive equipment, sensory space • Warm water pool • Multipurpose rooms • Serves 65% program categories listed in surveys • Larger rooms desired • Geographic decentralization to promote access Program Growth Opportunities Asked the public: ✓ To provide ideas within these categories b Program Growth The draft plan identifies programmatic opportunities for growth and enhancement. Specific program areas are summarized below. Fitness & Wellness 4a Aquatics grl Teens ,7 Nature Inclusive & Adaptive Adults '-'ll• VA Cultural litpCultural Experiences Celebrations Satellite Facility Concept Drawing Responds to: ✓ Equitable access ✓ South, west multipurpose program space b FUTURE EXPANSION i 5 1 1 1 1 FUTURE EXPANSION L......... GENDER NEUTRAL RESTROOMS. %'`„�-� .•�_ ` YPast� SERVICE . : —a �� _pmpttlAl Ix Cutter MAP o l0 © ;v1 /R1 0 1 . 4 /i i' / "rl ooc -= . - i,/ 0 /f .� °° 0 "' II — ��. .�''\; rp NN i0 - :41 Legend Iowa ay Bo teary r_: Ragtag Are Itomf,rrangAra o Part Aaess (motion Strike Ata -10 -ries St* Location lova Oty Puts rd Greta SP+ar UI Prcperty UlBoundary O Schools Outdoor Facilities Site Condition MERCER PARK 8 Pickleball Courts EU Soccer Fields 0 3 Tennis Courts 4 Baseball Fields 161 Site Evaluation Rank b� 1317 Dover St 27 ACRES 6 5 0 Mercer Park Site Rating 6 6 0 m Fm T 1 4 1 trve ownoul m0estrue.ne Trampaution Reyleton/AdninbVeNe /Intanrbk 40 IOWA CITY RECREATION FACILITIES AND PROGRAM COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN a0 3.5 3.0 2.5 20 15 1.0 0.5 0.0 3.3 Mercer Park Overall Field Condition 2.3 2.0 111.11 Basebat Field Baseball Field Baseball Field Baseball Field Soccer Field 1 Soccer Flees 2 saner Field 3 Soccer new a 2 3 e SPORTS FIELDS ASSESSMENT Park Improvement Recommendations Recom ons City Park Eastside SportsIowa Complex* — City Kickers Soccer Park Mercer Park — Napoleon Park Create Park Master Plan (long-term vision — Special spaces/park identity is needed X X X X Provide paved ADA connections to all park amenities X X X X Add identity and wayfinding signage in parks and along trails X X X X X Add trail head identity, and ADA trail -system access in the park X X Improve spectator amenities (seating, views, etc. X X Replace backstops and fencing X X X Add/improve netting and other ball control/safety measures X X X Add/improve lighting/scoreboards X X X X Possible artificial turf location X X Restore grass and rest fields Improve drainage/grading X X Improve/add irrigation X X Add/Improve water access/drinking fountains X Add/improve restroom facilities X Add/improve concessions facilities X X Add/improve maintenance/storage facilities X X Add/renovate shelters/shade X X X Add/expand parking X X X Provide pedestrian/bicycle access to the park X X Provide bus route access to the park X X Expand park acreage by acquiring adjacent parcel(s X Improve multi -use open space X Add landscape layer X X X X Add/improve support amenities (playgrounds, fitness equipment, courts, etc.) X X Outdoor Facility Priorities Asks the public: / To help prioritize Phase 2 Response: #1. Mercer Park #2. Eastside Sports Complex #3. City Park Baseball #4. Kickers Sports Complex #5. Napoleon Park Softball b Outdoor Facility Priorities Which site should receive improvements first? City Park Upgrades • Highlights: ball diamond improvements, pickieball/tennis • Estimate: $$$ Eastside Sports Complex Master Plan Implementation • Highlights: 6 ball diamonds, up to 10 rectangular fields, dog run, picnic areas, loop trail, restrooms, playground, indoor facility • Estimate: $$$$ Kickers Sports Complex • Highlights: Design master plan • Estimate: $$ Mercer Park Fields Master Plan Implementatio • Highlights: ball diamond renovation, new concessions roof, shade features, LED lights, pickieball renovation/expansion • Estimate: $$$ Napoleon Park Upgrades • Highlights: ball diamond improvements • Estimate: $S Indoor Facilities __ _ -.:.rte Y: 1 -1�- _c _ Mercer Aquatic Center & Scanlon Gymnasium Mercer Park Aquatic Center & Scanlon Gymnasium Architectural Facility Assessment Review Priority One Findings External • Investigate roof insulation above natatorium • Reseal translucent panel • Reseal masonry expansion joint • Investigate solarium window gasket leaks Interior Remediate water infiltration at gymnasium and repair wood flooring Repair pool deck cracked tile Repair rusted lintel at entry and gymnasium corridor ADA • Changing bench too high • Pool stairs should be max 7" riser height, these are 9.5" b� «T Group WILLIAMS ARCHITECTSI-QUATICS Architecture 1 PlGrc s i Interiors Mercer Aquatic Center Recommendations • All repairs should be performed in order to extend the life __ of the facility, reduce further deterioration, and address safety ASOIN issues. • It is recommended that the wading pool be shut down due to the condition it is in and the fact that it is not used. b Mercer Park Pool Concept Drawing Responds to: ✓ Aqua fitness and instruction ✓ Accessible access into water ✓ Inclusive locker/restrooms ✓ Operating efficiencies — aquatics, single service desk ✓ East multipurpose program space b Scanlon Gym Concept Drawing Responds to: ✓ Indoor walking track priority ✓ Fitness and wellness priority ✓ Large indoor space post-Covid- 19 (gym) ✓ Structural efficiencies — reconfigured room access ✓ Continued teen service growth ✓ East multipurpose program space b 2 -LANE 15ALKING TRACK GYMNASIUM ADDIf1ON GYIANASIUM 0 ' G V - 1 MJL1.P' R'CLSE ROOM I.IJLT1-PURPOSE ROOM J LOSEY 1 J IC:S i ESPORTS or Robert A. Lee Community Recreation Center Robert A. Lee Community Recreation Center Architectural Facility Assessment Review Priority One Findings Natatorium: Poor wading pool circulation Deteriorating cast iron pipes, filtration, and pumps Substandard locker rooms Remediate rusted structural connections Rusted door hardware Rec Center: Water seepage along Gilbert Provide compliant means of egress (upper & lower level corridor) ADA: Ramp landing far exceeds max 2.08%, at 3.5% Restroom sign on wall mounted too low Sign must be mounted to 48" to 60" of the bottom of the lowest characters NotWT M WILIAMS Group ARCHITECTSf.4CJG.TIOS ::.1. ._ l9 meg Robert A. Lee Community Rec. Center Recommendations • With a pool that is 58 years old, continual repairs will be required to maintain the facility. • Repairs/replacements could be done by the city to extend the facility operation; however, maintaining the aging infrastructure will make it more costly and difficult every year. • The cost of the repairs versus replacing the pool needs be compared to determine which direction should be taken. • Estimated cost of needed repairs $4.5 - $5.04M II11///TILYT►►► 4 WY. r LMiiu,_fr * k . � �� `__ 171111.: - r" .1 • _ te'<=-.. _may._2. _ _ -=- -. _ + I`` t ;roe • • City Park Pool City Park Pool Architectural Facility Assessment Review Priority One Findings Pool Water loss from pool vessel and surge tank Remove peeling paint in pool vessel Conduct sealant inspection of pool vessel, yearly Bathhouse Replace damaged soffit vents and cedar fascia Resolve lower level confined space of filtration equipment ADA • New fountain too low, lacks knee clearance 6.7% slope far exceeds allowable slope of 2% cross lope or 5% running slope Pool deck too steep I) «T WARCHITECTS!ILLIAMS Group City Park Pool Recommendations • With a pool that is 72 years old, it is not a suitable long term investment solution to continue making major repairs to the facility. We do not know of any pools that are this old and still operating. • The pool structure is at or approaching the end of its useful life and plans should be made to replace the facility in the future. • Repairs/replacements could be done by the city to minimally extend the facility life/operation. b City Park Pool Concept Drawing Responds to: ✓ Accessible entrance to facility and pool ✓ Reduced carbon footprint (less water, solar panels) ✓ Inclusive locker/restrooms ✓ More shade ✓ North multipurpose program space ✓ Increased lap lane hours b ADMIN PARTY ROOM' ADMISSION SINGLE USER TOILETS FOR PARK SERVICE DRIVE FILTER BUILDING SOLAR PANELS LAWN EXISTING POOL FENCE LOCATION PLUNGE POOL LAP POOL DROP OFF FOOD TRUCK PARKING BATHHOUSE GENDER NEUTRAL RESTROOMS W DECK SHOWERS & LOCKERS ZERO DEPTH ENTRY LEISURE POOL WITH SPRAY FEATURES EXISTING PLAYGROUND LAWN CURRENT CHANNEL CABANA ZONE City Park Pool FY Annual Net Expenses b Robert A. Lee Indoor Pool Mercer Indoor Pool 2019 2020 2021 $243,849 $265,973* $157,570** $219,299 $207,923* $131,704*** $213,926 $168,186* $236,195*** 2022 $331,391 $137,867 $244,753 -closed 3 months of FY2020 **closed for 11 months of FY2021 ***open with limited capacity and programs in FY2021 Existing Capital Funding Location/Project FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025 Recreation Center Improvements RALRC Pool Filter & HVAC Mercer Ball Diamonds $250,000 $700,000 Tennis/Pickleball Court Renovation City Park Pool Upper City Park Restrooms/Shelters $640,000 $950,000 $175,000 $500,000 $5,500,000 $50,000 $550,000 Annual Recreation Center Improvements Annual Park ADA Improvements b $50,000 $30,000 $50,000 $30,000 $50,000 $30,000 I<ey Findings Summary b� Retain City Park Pool's original aesthetics and character when renovating into a more accessible facility Supply and demand gaps exist in adult fitness and wellness, nature, aquatic, and inclusive & adaptive program areas Grow programs that are focused on specific cultural experiences and/or celebrations The Robert A. Lee Community Recreation Center indoor pool is in need of extensive and expensive repair Additional facility space is needed for multipurpose and fitness/wellness use, spread across geographically diverse locations Add programs for teens and all four adult age segments (young adult, adult, active agers, and seniors) A warm water pool would provide better access to, and support for, swim lessons, aquatic exercise, and open swim Prioritization of outdoor facility upgrades require more community input Phase 2 Community Feedback Themes City Park Pool: • Not enough lap lanes • Prefer traditional footprint • Zero depth = positive Indoor Pools: • Downtown/Central location preferred • Cost prohibitive • RAL = more accessible Decentralization: • Overall positive sentiment • Need more information • Invest elsewhere b� Indoor Program Space: • Indoor walking track — great • Positive overall sentiment • Fitness is great Athletic Field Priorities • 1) Mercer Park • 2) Eastside Sports Complex • 3) City Park Baseball • 4) Kickers Sports Complex • 5) Napoleon Park Softball Parks Commission Next Steps Council • Confirm priorities and strategies presented in this update • Review the plan document (late summer/early fall) b • Review the plan document (late summer/early fall) Staff • Address programming and smaller ADA maintenance items (on-going) • Include Plan Priorities in Budget Process (fall/winter) • Educate the community about the plans Consultants • Refine and package final plan document