Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2019-09-17 Resolution
Item Number: 6.b. � + wMO°• CITY OF IOWA CITY www.icgov.org September 17, 2019 Motion Granting a 60 -Day Extension to the Community Police Review Board for the Filing of the Public Report with the City Council on Complaint #19-02. ATTACHMENTS: Description CPRB 19-02 Extension Request Community POLICE REVIEW BOARD A Board of the City of Iowa City 410 East Washington Street Iowa City IA 52240-1826 (319)356-5041 September 12, 2019 Mayor James Throgmorton 410 E. Washington Street Iowa City, IA 52240 Dear Mayor and Council Members: As the acting CPRE Chairperson, I would IIKe to request an extension to the Board's deadline to file its Public Report for Complaint #19-02. Paragraph 8-8-7B(8) of the enabling local ordinance provides that the city council may grant a request for an extension upon a showing of good cause. The Board's good cause in support of this request is shown as follows: 0 Due to timelines and scheduling Public Report presently due September 30, 2019 60 -day Extension request — Report would be due on November 27, 2019. Sincerely, Monique Galpin' , Vice -Chair �4 Community Police Review Board cc: City Attorney Item Number: 6.c. �, CITY OF IOWA CITY �'�COUNCIL ACTION REPORT September 17, 2019 Resolution rescinding the 2010 Commercial Driver's License Substance Abuse Prevention Program for Drugs and Alcohol adopted in Resolution No. 10-350 and establishing a new DOT Drug and Alcohol Policy. Prepared By: Karen Jennings, Human Resources Administrator Reviewed By: Ashley Monroe, Assistant City Manager Fiscal Impact: None Recommendations: Staff: Approval Commission: Attachments: Resolution City of Iowa City Drug and Alcohol Policy Executive Summary: The City of Iowa City Drug and Alcohol Policy has been created to replace the City's existing Commercial Driver's License Substance Abuse Prevention Program for Drug and Alcohol. Background /Analysis: The City was selected for a Federal Transit Authority drug and alcohol program testing audit. The audit was completed in August 2019 and resulted in required updates to the City's Commercial Driver's License Substance Abuse Prevention Program for Drug and Alcohol. A new City of Iowa City Drug and Alcohol Policy was created adopting the Department of Transportation's recommended format and incorporating the updates required by the Federal Transit Authority. Staff recommends that Council rescind the existing Commercial Driver's License Substance Abuse Prevention Program for Drug and Alcohol and establish and adopt the City of Iowa City Drug and Alcohol Policy. ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution City of Iowa City Drug and Alcohol Policy LA Prepared by: Karen Jennings, Human Resources Administrator, 410 E. Washington St.., Iowa City, IA 52240 (319) 3565025 Resolution Number. 19-232 Resolution rescinding the 2010 Commercial Driver's License Substance Abuse Prevention Program for Drugs and Alcohol and establishing a new DOT Drug and Alcohol Policy Whereas, federal law mandates alcohol and drug testing programs for employees in Department of Transportation safety -sensitive positions; and Whereas, Resolution No. 10-350 adopted by the City Council on July 12, 2010, established the existing Commercial Driver's License Substance Abuse Prevention Program for Drugs and Alcohol; and Whereas, the program and policy have been updated to reflect changes required as the result of an August 2019 audit by the Federal Transit Authority. Now Therefore, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa that 1. The existing Commercial Driver's License Substance Abuse Prevention Program for Drugs and Alcohol established by Resolution No 10-350 is hereby rescinded. 2. The City of Iowa City Drug and Alcohol Policy attached to this resolution and by this reference made a part hereof is hereby established and adopted. Passed and approved this 17th day of September —,20 19 / Ma r h Attest: City Clerk It was moved by Sa1ih and upon roll call there were: I_\I :63 X X X X x X and seconded by Cole NAYS: Approv d by cl -s—Y S City Attorneys Office the Resolution be adopted, ABSENT: Cole Mims Salih Taylor Teague Thomas Throgmorton City of Iowa City Drug and Alcohol Policy — FTA and FMCSA City of Iowa City Drug and Alcohol Policy Effective as of September 18, 2019 Adopted by: Date Adopted: Last Revised: September 2019 City of Iowa City Drug and Alcohol Policy — FTA and FMCSA Table of Contents 1. Purpose of Policy.................................................................................................................................1 2. Covered Employees.............................................................................................................................1 3. Prohibited Behavior............................................................................................................................2 4. Consequences for Violations............................................................................................................... 3 5. Circumstances for Testing...................................................................................................................5 6. Testing Procedures..............................................................................................................................9 7. Test Refusals........................................................................................................................................9 8. Prescription Drug Use.......................................................................................................................10 9. Contact Person..................................................................................................................................10 Attachment A: Covered Positions...............................................................................................................11 City of Iowa City Drug and Alcohol Policy — FTA and FMCSA I. Purpose of Policy This policy complies with 49 CFR Part 655, as amended, 49 CFR Part 382, as amended, and 49 CFR Part 40, as amended. Copies of Parts 655, 382, and 40 can be found on the Internet at the Department of Transportation (DOT) Office of Drug and Alcohol Policy and Compliance website http://www.transportation. ovg /odapc. All covered employees are required to submit to drug and alcohol tests as a condition of employment in accordance with these regulations. Portions of this policy are not DOT -mandated, but reflect the City of Iowa City's policy. These additional provisions are identified by bold text. In addition, DOT has published 49 CFR Part 32, implementing the Drug -Free Workplace Act of 1988, which requires the establishment of drug-free workplace policies and the reporting of certain drug-related offenses to the FTA. All City of Iowa City employees are subject to the provisions of the Drug -Free Workplace Act of 1988. The unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensation, possession or use of a controlled substance is prohibited in the covered workplace. An employee who is convicted of any criminal drug statute for a violation occurring in the workplace shall notify Human Resources no later than five days after such conviction. 2. Covered Employees This policy applies to every person whose position requires the possession of a commercial driver's license (CDL); every employee performing a "safety -sensitive function" as defined below, and any person applying for such positions. Under the Federal Commercial Motor Vehicle Safety Act ("FMCSA")(Part 382), you are a covered employee if you perform any of the following safety -sensitive functions: • Driving a commercial motor vehicle which requires the driver to have a CDL • Waiting to be dispatched to operate a commercial motor vehicle • Inspecting, servicing, or conditioning any commercial motor vehicle • Performing all other functions in or upon a commercial motor vehicle (except resting in a sleeper berth) • Loading or unloading a commercial motor vehicle, supervising or assisting in the loading or unloading, attending a vehicle being loaded or unloading, remaining in readiness to operate the vehicle, or giving or receiving receipts for shipments being loaded or unloaded • Repairing, obtaining assistance, or remaining in attendance upon a disabled vehicle City of Iowa City Drug and Alcohol Policy — FTA and FMCSA Under Federal Transit Administration ("FTA") requirements (Part 655), you are a covered employee if you perform any of the following safety -sensitive functions: • Operating a revenue service vehicle, in or out of revenue service • Operating a non -revenue vehicle requiring a commercial driver's license • Controlling movement or dispatch of a revenue service vehicle • Maintaining (including repairs, overhaul and rebuilding) of a revenue service vehicle or equipment used in revenue service • Carrying a firearm for security purposes See Attachment A for a list of covered positions by job title. 3. Prohibited Behavior Use of illegal drugs is prohibited at all times. All covered employees are prohibited from reporting for duty or remaining on duty any time there is a quantifiable presence of a prohibited drug in the body at or above the minimum thresholds defined in Part 40. Prohibited drugs include: • marihuana • cocaine • phencyclidine (PCP) • opioids • amphetamines All covered employees are prohibited from performing or continuing to perform safety -sensitive functions while having an alcohol concentration of 0.04 or greater. All covered employees are prohibited from consuming alcohol while performing safety -sensitive job functions or while on-call to perform safety -sensitive job functions. If an on-call employee has consumed alcohol, they must acknowledge the use of alcohol at the time that they are called to report for duty. If the on-call employee claims the ability to perform his or her safety -sensitive function, he or she must take an alcohol test with a result of less than 0.02 prior to performance. All covered employees are prohibited from consuming alcohol within four (4) hours prior to the performance of safety -sensitive job functions. All covered employees are prohibited from consuming alcohol for eight (8) hours following involvement in an accident or until he or she submits to the post -accident drug and alcohol test, whichever occurs first. 2 City of Iowa City Drug and Alcohol Policy — FTA and FMCSA 4. Consequences for Violations FTA Consequences Following a positive drug or alcohol test result (BAC at or above 0.04) or test refusal, the employee will be immediately removed from safety -sensitive duty and referred to a Substance Abuse Professional ("SAP"). Following a BAC of 0.02 or greater, but less than 0.04, the employee will be immediately removed from safety -sensitive duties for at least eight hours unless a retest results in the employee's alcohol concentration being less than 0.02. The employee will be required to use applicable leave accruals for time missed, as further outlined below. Any employee who is unable to perform their assigned duties under this section will receive disciplinary action in the form of a written warning for the first occurrence. This warning will be considered a serious infraction. Following the employee's return to work an employee who cannot perform their assigned duties a second time because they have an alcohol concentration of .02 or greater or they test positive for drugs, will be terminated. Hourly or seasonal employees who have a reported positive drug test or a reported alcohol concentration of .02 or greater will be subject to immediate termination of employment. FMCSA Consequences Following a positive drug or alcohol test result (BAC at or above 0.04) or test refusal, the employee will be immediately removed from safety -sensitive duty and referred to a Substance Abuse Professional (SAP). Following a BAC of 0.02 or greater, but less than 0.04, the employee will be immediately removed from safety -sensitive duties until the start of the employee's next regularly scheduled duty period, but not less than 24 hours following administration of the test. The employee will be required to use applicable leave accruals for time missed, as further outlined below. Any employee who is unable to perform their assigned duties under this section will receive disciplinary action in the form of a written warning for the first occurrence. This warning will be considered a serious infraction. Following the employee's return to work, an employee who cannot perform their assigned duties a second time because they have an alcohol concentration of .02 or greater or they test positive for drugs, will be terminated. Hourly or seasonal employees who have a reported positive drug test or a reported alcohol concentration of .02 or greater will be subject to immediate termination of employment. Treatment/Discipline Any employee who tests positive for drugs or alcohol (BAC at or above 0.04) or refuses to test will be referred to a Substance Abuse Professional (SAP) and subject to the following requirements: 3 City of Iowa City Drug and Alcohol Policy — FTA and FMCSA • Removed from safety -sensitive duties. • Evaluated by a SAP to determine what treatment is necessary and will follow all recommendations of the SAP. If the levels of drugs do not decrease in a timely manner, as determined by the SAP, the SAP will report this to the Designated Employer Representative (DER) and the employee will be subject to disciplinary action. Subject to return to duty drug and alcohol tests. The SAP will notify the City when the employee is ready to take a return to duty test. For drugs, the employee must have a negative test result before being allowed to perform safety -sensitive duties. For alcohol, the employee must have a test result of less than .02 before being allowed to perform safety -sensitive duties. A positive result on a return to duty test will be considered a second positive test and subject to disciplinary action including termination of employment. Employees completing treatment will be: • Evaluated by a SAP to determine that the employee has successfully completed the treatment program. • Subject to unannounced follow-up drug tests under the following guidelines: o The number and frequency of follow up tests will be determined by a SAP and will consist of a minimum of six tests in the first twelve months; o The City will direct the employee to undergo follow-up drug or alcohol tests as determined by the SAP; o The SAP may require testing beyond the first twelve months, however, follow-up testing will not exceed 60 months from the date of the employee's return to duty; and o The SAP may end testing after the first six tests if they determine that such tests are no longer necessary. Employee testing, evaluation, and treatment cost requirements: • Evaluation and rehabilitation must be performed by a SAP. The cost of evaluation by the SAP is the responsibility of the employee. The cost of any required treatment is also the responsibility of the employee. • The cost of drug and alcohol tests will be paid by the City for pre-employment, post- accident, random and reasonable suspicion tests. If an employee requires return to duty or follow up testing, such costs shall be paid by the employee. • Sick leave or other applicable accruals may be used for work time spent in required counseling sessions if satisfactory documentation of attendance is provided. Sick leave may not be used for time away from work for a SAP evaluation or while an employee is waiting to take a return to duty test. Employee work status: Except for cases involving injury or damage to property, the first time that a positive drug test is reported by the MRO or an employee tests positive for alcohol by having an alcohol concentration of .04 or greater, the employee may not return to work until they have completed the treatment program recommended by the SAP and have successfully passed a return to duty drug or alcohol test. During this period of time the employee will be required to use applicable accruals. If an 4 City of Iowa City Drug and Alcohol Policy — FTA and FMCSA employee runs out of applicable accruals before they are released to return to work they may request an unpaid leave of absence (subject to terms and conditions of the City Personnel Policies, applicable collective bargaining agreement, or applicable City policy) for a limited time until the employee has successfully completed the recommended treatment program and passed a return to work test. In either case, an employee who cannot perform assigned duties will receive disciplinary action in the form of a written warning for inability to perform their assigned duties. This will be considered a serious infraction. An employee fails to contact/meet with a SAP, fails to communicate with the employer's representative as directed, continues to use a controlled substance while under the care of a SAP, or fails to comply with the recommended treatment will be subject to discipline up to and including termination. It is expected that the amount of a controlled substance will decrease on subsequent tests given under the direction of the SAP. Following the employee's return to work an employee who cannot perform their assigned duties a second time because they have an alcohol concentration of .02 or greater or they test positive for drugs, will be terminated. If an employee is tested for drugs as a result of reasonable suspicion, the employee will be charged with use of applicable leave accruals for this time and will be subject to the guidelines and discipline described above. If the test results are negative, the employee will be paid for time spent awaiting the results of the test and no leave accruals will be used. Violations of this policy resulting in personal injury or injury to another individual or violations resulting in damage to public or private property may result in termination of employment on the first offense. 5. Circumstances for Testing Pre -Employment Testing A negative pre-employment drug test result is required before an employee can first perform safety - sensitive functions. If a pre-employment test is canceled, the individual will be required to undergo another test and successfully pass with a verified negative result before performing safety -sensitive functions. If a covered employee has not performed a safety -sensitive function for 90 or more consecutive calendar days, and has not been in the random testing pool during that time, the employee must take and pass a pre-employment test before he or she can return to a safety -sensitive function. A covered employee or applicant who has previously failed or refused a DOT pre-employment drug and/or alcohol test must provide proof of having successfully completed a referral, evaluation, and treatment plan meeting DOT requirements. FMCSA Drug Testing Exceptions A driver is not required to undergo a pre-employment test if - 5 City of Iowa City Drug and Alcohol Policy — FTA and FMCSA (1) The driver has participated in a DOT testing program within the previous 30 days; and (2) While participating in that program, either: a) Was drug tested within the past six months (from the date of application with the City of Iowa City), or b) Participated in the random drug testing program for the previous 12 months (from the date of application with the City of Iowa City); and (3) The City of Iowa City can ensure that no prior employer of the driver of whom the City of Iowa City has knowledge has records of a violation of this part or the controlled substances use rule of another DOT agency within the previous six months Reasonable Suspicion Testing All covered employees shall be subject to a drug and/or alcohol test when the City of Iowa City has reasonable suspicion to believe that the covered employee has used a prohibited drug and/or engaged in alcohol misuse. A reasonable suspicion referral for testing will be made by a trained supervisor or other trained company official on the basis of specific, contemporaneous, articulable observations concerning the appearance, behavior, speech, or body odors of the covered employee. Covered employees may be subject to reasonable suspicion drug testing any time while on duty. Covered employees may be subject to reasonable suspicion alcohol testing while the employee is performing safety -sensitive functions, just before the employee is to perform safety -sensitive functions, or just after the employee has ceased performing such functions. Post -Accident Testing FTA Procedures Covered employees shall be subject to FTA post -accident drug and alcohol testing under the following circumstances: Fatal Accidents As soon as practicable following an accident involving the loss of a human life, drug and alcohol tests will be conducted on each surviving covered employee operating the public transportation vehicle at the time of the accident. In addition, any other covered employee whose performance could have contributed to the accident, as determined by the City of Iowa City using the best information available at the time of the decision, will be tested. Non-fatal Accidents As soon as practicable following an accident not involving the loss of a human life, drug and alcohol tests will be conducted on each covered employee operating the public transportation vehicle at the time of the accident if at least one of the following conditions is met: (1) The accident results in injuries requiring immediate medical treatment away from the scene, unless the covered employee can be completely discounted as a contributing factor to the accident 0 City of Iowa City Drug and Alcohol Policy — FTA and FMCSA (2) One or more vehicles incurs disabling damage and must be towed away from the scene, unless the covered employee can be completely discounted as a contributing factor to the accident (3) The vehicle is a rail car, trolley car or bus, or vessel, and is removed from operation, unless the covered employee can be completely discounted as a contributing factor to the accident In addition, any other covered employee whose performance could have contributed to the accident, as determined by the City of Iowa City using the best information available at the time of the decision, will be tested. A covered employee subject to post -accident testing must remain readily available, or it is considered a refusal to test. Nothing in this section shall be construed to require the delay of necessary medical attention for the injured following an accident or to prohibit a covered employee from leaving the scene of an accident for the period necessary to obtain assistance in responding to the accident or to obtain necessary emergency medical care. FMCSA Procedures Covered employees shall be subject to FMCSA post -accident drug and alcohol testing under the following circumstances: Fatal Accidents As soon as practicable following an occurrence involving a commercial motor vehicle operating on a public road in commerce, and involving the loss of a human life, drug and alcohol tests will be conducted on each surviving covered employee who was performing safety -sensitive functions with respect to the vehicle. Non-fatal Accidents As soon as practicable following an occurrence involving a commercial motor vehicle operating on a public road in commerce, and not involving the loss of a human life, an alcohol test will be conducted on each driver who receives a citation within eight (8) hours of the occurrence under State or local law for a moving traffic violation arising from the accident, if - (1) £ (1) The accident results in injuries requiring immediate medical treatment away from the scene; or (2) One or more motor vehicles incur disabling damage and must be transported away from the scene by a tow truck or other motor vehicle. As soon as practicable following an occurrence involving a commercial motor vehicle operating on a public road in commerce, and not involving the loss of a human life, a drug test will be conducted on each driver who receives a citation within thirty-two (32) hours of the occurrence under State or local law for a moving traffic violation arising from the accident, if - 7 City of Iowa City Drug and Alcohol Policy — FTA and FMCSA (1) The accident results in injuries requiring immediate medical treatment away from the scene; or (2) One or more motor vehicles incur disabling damage and must be transported away from the scene by a tow truck or other motor vehicle. A covered employee subject to post -accident testing must remain readily available, or it is considered a refusal to test. Nothing in this section shall be construed to require the delay of necessary medical attention for the injured following an accident or to prohibit a covered employee from leaving the scene of an accident for the period necessary to obtain assistance in responding to the accident or to obtain necessary emergency medical care. Random Testing Random drug and alcohol tests are unannounced and unpredictable, and the dates for administering random tests are spread reasonably throughout the calendar year. Random testing will be conducted at all times of the day when safety -sensitive functions are performed. Testing rates will meet or exceed the minimum annual percentage rate set each year within each DOT agency. The current year testing rates can be viewed online at http://www.transportation. ovg_/odapc/random-testing rates. If a given driver is subject to random testing under the rules of more than one DOT agency, the driver will be subject to random drug and alcohol testing at the annual percentage rate established by the DOT agency regulating more than 50% of the driver's function. The selection of employees for random drug and alcohol testing will be made by a scientifically valid method, such as a random number table or a computer-based random number generator. Under the selection process used, each covered employee will have an equal chance of being tested each time selections are made. A covered employee may only be randomly tested for alcohol misuse while the employee is performing safety -sensitive functions, just before the employee is to perform safety -sensitive functions, or just after the employee has ceased performing such functions. A covered employee may be randomly tested for prohibited drug use anytime while on duty. Each covered employee who is notified of selection for random drug or random alcohol testing must immediately proceed to the designated testing site. Return to Duty Testing Any employee who is allowed to return to safety -sensitive duty after failing or refusing to submit to a DOT drug and/or alcohol test must first be evaluated by a substance abuse professional (SAP), complete a SAP -required program of education and/or treatment, and provide a negative return -to -duty drug and/or alcohol test result. All tests will be conducted in accordance with 49 CFR Part 40, Subpart O. 0 City of Iowa City Drug and Alcohol Policy — FTA and FMCSA Follow-up Testing Employees returning to safety -sensitive duty following leave for substance abuse rehabilitation will be required to undergo unannounced follow-up alcohol and/or drug testing for a period of one (1) to five (5) years, as directed by the SAP. The duration of testing will be extended to account for any subsequent leaves of absence, as necessary. The type (drug and/or alcohol), number, and frequency of such follow-up testing shall be directed by the SAP. All testing will be conducted in accordance with 49 CFR Part 40, Subpart O. 6. Testing Procedures All FTA drug and alcohol testing will be conducted in accordance with 49 CFR Part 40, as amended. Dilute Urine Specimen If there is a negative dilute test result, the City of Iowa City will accept the test result and there will be no retest, unless the creatinine concentration of a negative dilute specimen was greater than or equal to 2 mg/dL, but less than or equal to 5 mg/dL. Dilute negative results with a creatinine level greater than or equal to 2 mg/dL but less than or equal to 5 mg/dL require an immediate recollection under direct observation (see 49 CFR Part 40, section 40.67). Split Specimen Test In the event of a verified positive test result, or a verified adulterated or substituted result, the employee can request that the split specimen be tested at a second laboratory. The City of Iowa City guarantees that the split specimen test will be conducted in a timely fashion. 7. Test Refusals As a covered employee, you have refused to test if you: (1) Fail to appear for any test (except a pre-employment test) within a reasonable time, as determined by the City of Iowa City. (2) Fail to remain at the testing site until the testing process is complete. An employee who leaves the testing site before the testing process commences for a pre-employment test has not refused to test. (3) Fail to attempt to provide a breath or urine specimen. An employee who does not provide a urine or breath specimen because he or she has left the testing site before the testing process commenced for a pre-employment test has not refused to test. 0 City of Iowa City Drug and Alcohol Policy — FTA and FMCSA (4) In the case of a directly -observed or monitored urine drug collection, fail to permit monitoring or observation of your provision of a specimen. (5) Fail to provide a sufficient quantity of urine or breath without a valid medical explanation. (6) Fail or decline to take a second test as directed by the collector or the City of Iowa City for drug testing. (7) Fail to undergo a medical evaluation as required by the MRO or the City of Iowa City's Designated Employer Representative (DER). (8) Fail to cooperate with any part of the testing process. (9) Fail to follow an observer's instructions to raise and lower clothing and turn around during a directly -observed test. (10) Possess or wear a prosthetic or other device used to tamper with the collection process. (11) Admit to the adulteration or substitution of a specimen to the collector or MRO. (12) Refuse to sign the certification at Step 2 of the Alcohol Testing Form (ATF). (13) Fail to remain readily available following an accident. As a covered employee, if the MRO reports that you have a verified adulterated or substituted test result, you have refused to take a drug test. As a covered employee, if you refuse to take a drug and/or alcohol test, you incur the same consequences as testing positive and will be immediately removed from performing safety -sensitive functions, and referred to a SAP. 8. Prescription Drug Use The appropriate use of legally prescribed drugs and non-prescription medications is not prohibited. However, the use of any substance which carries a warning label that indicates that mental functioning, motor skills, or judgment may be adversely affected must be reported to [decide who to report to]. Medical advice should be sought, as appropriate, while taking such medication and before performing safety -sensitive duties. 9. Contact Person For questions about the City of Iowa City's anti-drug and alcohol misuse program, contact Human Resources. 10 City of Iowa City Drug and Alcohol Policy — FTA and FMCSA Attachment A: Covered Positions FTA Safety -Sensitive Positions Mass Transit Operator Maintenance Worker II — Transit Operations Supervisor Mechanic II — Transit Mechanic III — Transit Associate Director — Transportation Services FMCSA Safety -Sensitive Positions Cemetery MW III - Cemetery Equipment Equipment Superintendent Equipment Shop Supervisor Mechanic I Mechanic II Mechanic III (Day) Mechanic III (Evening) Forest MW I — Forestry MW II — Forestry MWIII — Forestry Senior MW — Forestry Landfill Assistant Superintendent — Landfill Landfill Operator Landfill Operator — Heavy Equipment MWII — East Side Recycling Center Senior MW — Landfill Parks MW I — Parks MW II — Parks MW III — Parks Senior MW — Parks Senior MW — Turfgrass Specialist 11 Refuse Assistant Superintendent — Refuse MW I — Refuse MW II — Refuse MW III — Refuse Streets/Traffic Engineering Electrician — Traffic Engineering Electronics Technician — Traffic Engineering MW I — Streets MW II — Streets MW III — Streets MW III — Lead Sweeper Operator Signs and Pavement Markings Technician Senior MW — Streets Wastewater Electrician — Wastewater Electronics Technician — Wastewater Maintenance Operator — Wastewater MW I — Wastewater Treatment MW III — Wastewater Collections Sr MW — Wastewater Collections Sr. MW — Wastewater Plant Treatment Plant Operator — WW Treatment Sr. TPO Wastewater Treatment Water Maintenance Operator — Water MW I — Water Customer Service City of Iowa City Drug and Alcohol Policy — FTA and FMCSA MW II — Water Service MW III — Water Service MW II -Water Distribution MW III — Water Distribution Senior MW — Water Distribution Senior MW — Water Plan Senior TPO - Water All employees working in variable hour and seasonal positions which require a CDL for the performance of safety -sensitive functions. 12 Item Number: 6.d. ®I CITY OF IOWA CITY u► �� COUNCIL ACTION REPORT September 17, 2019 Resolution approving the City Street Financial Report for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2019. Prepared By: Sara Sproule, Assistant Controller Reviewed By: Dennis Bockenstedt, Finance Director Fiscal Impact: If not approved and submitted by September 30, 2019 the City could risk losing annual Road Use Tax funding. For fiscal year 2020, this is budgeted at $8,426,500 Recommendations: Staff: Approval C •uu •1 ►/_1 Attachments: Road Use Tax Report Resolution Executive Summary: Iowa Code section 312.14 requires all cities to submit the Street Financial Report (SFR) to the Iowa Department of Transportation (DOT) by September 30 of each year. In accordance with Iowa Code section 312.15, the Iowa DOT must notify the state treasurer of each city not in compliance with this requirement. Once notified, the state treasurer will withhold the Road Use Tax (RUT) funds allocated to the city until the city complies. If a city has not filed its report by December 31 of the same year, RUT funds shall not be allocated to that city and all funds withheld under this provision shall revert to the street construction fund of the cities. Background /Analysis: The Street Financial report is required to include revenues and expenditures in the Road Use Tax Fund, Other Street Monies which applies to revenues and expenditures with any city monies for street purposes only and Street Debt which includes bonds, notes and loans for only street related revenues and expenditures for any debt service payments. Road Use Tax receipts for the City of Iowa City for fiscal year 2019 were $8,766,802. Expenditures covered by RUT funds totaled $11,059,932 including $6,891,503 for Roadway Maintenance, $1,957,542 for Street/Bridge Construction and $800,486 for Administration. Other Street Monies receipts were $8,960,142. This includes the Streets/Bridges portion of General Obligation debt of $5,034,000, an Inter -fund loan of $1,000,000 and utility funds of $469,425. Other Street Monies expenditures were $16,696,826. The expenditures in excess of revenues are covered by amounts funded in prior years. Most of the expenditures were for Street/Bridge Construction and Roadway Maintenance totaling $13,674,765. This was comprised of various projects such as the Iowa City Gateway Project (Dubuque Street Elevation and Park Road Bridge Replacement) in the amount of $7,794,638, the Governor Street Overlay project in the amount of $2,068,704 and the streets share of the Public Works Facility in the amount of $1,824,833. ATTACHMENTS: Description FY 19 Road Use Tax Report Road Use Tax Resolution QIOWADOT Fom1517007 {5-2019} Office of Local Systems Ames, IA 50010 City Name IOWA CITY CihSwnUer 3715 City Street Financial Report Cover Sheet Now therefore let it be resolved that the city council IOWA CITY (City Narne) On 09/17/2019 did hereby approve and adopt the annual (month/day/y—) City Street Financial Report from July 1, 2018 to June 30, (Ye-) Contact Information , Iowa 2019 (Year) 9/192019 7:54 AM Fiscal Year 2019 1 of 11 Name E-mail Address I Street Address ci ZIP Code Sara Sproule sora-sproule@iowa-city.org 1410 East Washington Street Iowa City 52240-1826 Hours Phone Extension Phone(Ahenative) 8:00 AM - 5:00 PM 319-356-5088 319-356-5088 Preparer Information Name E-mail Address Phone Extension Sara Sproule & Ron Knoche sara-sproule@iowa-city.org 1319-356-5088 1319-356-5138 Mayor Information Jim I hrogmorton 'im-throgmorton@iowa-city.org 410 East Washington Street Iowa City 52240-1826 Phone Extension 319-356-5010 Resolution Number 19-233 Jim Throgmorton Kellie Druehling Signature Mayor Signature City Clerk QIOWADOT Fo= 517007 (5-2019) Office of Local Systems Ames, 1A 50010 City Name rOWA Crry CI SwnUer 3715 Column 1 Column 2 Road use Other Street Tax Fund Monies City Street Financial Report Summary Statement Sheet Column Column4 Street Debt Totals Round Figures to Nearest Dollars A.BEGINNING BALANCE 1. July Balance 1 $8,264,5351 $11,866,4421 $21,444,1541 $41,575,131 2. Adjustm ents (Note on Explanation Sheet) $0 $0 $0 $0 3. Adjusted Balance $8,264,535 $11,866,442 $21,444,154 $41,575,131 $0 $2,120,106 2. Right of Way Purchased $22,405 $28,796 B.REVENIJES 1. Road Use Tax $8,766,802 $1,957,542 $8,794,033 $8,766,802 2. Property Taxes 43raffic Services $451,025 $4,288,684 $4,739,709 3. Special Assessments F. Administration $0 $0 $0 4. Miscellaneous G. Equipment $2,085,827 $0 $2,085,827 5. Proceeds from Bonds,Notes, and Loans H. Miscellaneous $6,034,000 $0 $6,034,000 6. Interest Earned 1 $389,290 $0 $389,290 7. Total Revenues (Lines B1 thru B6) $8,766,802 $8,960,142 $4,288,684 $22,015,628 C. Total Funds Available (Line A3 + Line B7) $17,031,337 $20,826,584 $25,732,838 $63,590,759 9/1920197:54 AM Fsrrl Year 2019 2 o 11 Column 1 Column 2 Column 3 Column 4 Road use Other Street Street Debt Totals Tax Fund Monies Round Figures to Nearest Dollars EXPENSES D. Maintenance 1. Road Way Maintenance 1 $6,891,5031 $4,880,7321 $0 $11,772,235 2. Snow and Ice Removal $541,838 $24,769 $0 $566,607 E.Construction, Reconstruction and Improvements 1. Engineering $612,370 $1,507,736 $0 $2,120,106 2. Right of Way Purchased $22,405 $28,796 $0 $51,201 3. Street/Bridge Construction $1,957,542 $8,794,033 $0 $10,751,575 43raffic Services $142,114 $837,740 $0 $979,854 F. Administration $800,486 $50,322 $0 $850,808 G. Equipment $91,674 $0 $0 $91,674 H. Miscellaneous $572,698 $0 $572,698 J. street Debt 1. Bonds, Notes and Loans -Principal Paid $0 $0 $3,610,887 $3,610,887 2. Bonds, Notes and Loans - Interest Paid $0 $0 $677,797 $677,797 TOTALS K. Total Expenses (Lines D thin J) $11,059,932 $16,696,826 $4,288,684 $32,045,442 L. Ending Balance (Line C -K) $5,971,405 $4,129,758 $21,444,154 $31,545,317 M. Total Funds Accounted For (K+L=C) $17,031,337 $20,826,584 $25,732,838 $63,590,759 QIOWADOT City Street Financial Report Fo= 517007 {5-2019} Office of Local Systems Ames, IA 50010 City Name IOWA Crry Cih SwnUer 3715 Miscellaneous Revenues and Expenses Sheet 9/1920197:54 AM Fiscal Year 2019 3 o 11 Code Number and Itemization of Miscellaneous Revenues (Line B4 on the Summary Statement Sheet)(See Instructions) Column 2 Other Street Monies Column 3 Street Debt 110 ---Puking Revenues $572,698.00 $0.00 112 ---Utility Revenue $469,425.00 $0.00 115 ---Other Governments (misc.) $148.00 $0.00 116 ---Other Cities $195.00 $0.00 118 ---School Districts $16,514.00 $0.00 121 ---State Reimbursement $93,100.00 $0.00 123 ---Various State Grants $367,318.00 $0.00 144 --- FHWA Participation (Fed. Hwy. Admin.) $344,393.00 $0.00 170 ---Reimbursements (misc.) $38,371.00 $0.00 172 ---Labor & Services $37,636.00 $0.00 173 ---Reimbursement For Damages $22,321.00 $0.00 182 ---Property or Buildings (Sale or Rent) $50,426.00 $0.00 190 ---Other Miscellaneous $2,500.00 $0.00 194 ---General Fund Transfers $70,782.00 $0.00 Line B4 Tatalsi $2,085,827.00 Code Number and Itemization of Miscellaneous Expenses (Line H on the Summary Column 2 Column 3 Statement Sheet) "On street' parking expenses, street maintenance, buildings, insurance, Other Street Monies Street Debt administrative costs for printing, legal fees,bond fees etc. (See Instructions) A 230 ---On Street Parking Only $572,698.00 Line H Totals $572,698.00 QIOWADOT Fom1517007 {5-2019} Office of Local Systems Ames, 1A 50010 City Name sown C1TY Cih SwnUer 3715 City Street Financial Report Bonds, Notes and Loans Sheet 9/1920197:54 AM Flii.1 Year 2019 4 o 11 New Debt Type Debt Purpose DOT Issue Issue %Related Year Principal Total Total Principal Interest Principal Bond ? Use Only Date Amount to Street Due Balance Principal Interest Roads Roads Balance as as of 7/1 Paid Paid of 6/30 ❑ General Obligation Paving& 315 06/20/2012 $4,278,319 100 2022 $1,823,121 $438,681 $37,647 $438,681 $37,647 $1,384,440 construction ❑ General Obligation Paving& 316 07/16/2013 $3,181,200 100 2023 $1,841,400 $354,200 $29,777 $354,200 $29,777 $1,487,200 construction ❑ General Obligation Paving& 318 06/03/2014 $5,389,756 100 2024 $3,345,465 $526,253 $90,287 $526,253 $90,287 $2,819,212 construction ❑ General Obligation Paving& 319 06/02/2015 $4,836,042 100 2024 $3,512,886 $459,688 $71,446 $459,688 $71,446 $3,053,198 construction ❑ General Obligation Paving& 320 06/16/2016 $6,604,165 100 2026 $5,766,911 $672,055 $129,418 $672,055 $129,418 $5,094,856 Construction ❑ General Obligation Paving& 321 06/15/2017 $5,712,525 100 2027 $5,186,025 $529,425 $111,479 $529,425 $111,479 $4,656,600 construction ❑ General Obligation Paving& 322 06/01/2018 $6,924,758 100 2028 $6,924,758 $630,585 $207,743 $630,585 $207,743 $6,294,173 construction ❑✓ General Obligation Paving& 323 06/04/2019 $5,034,000 100 2029 $5,034,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,034,000 construction ❑✓ Short Term Notes Budge or Building 601 06/30/2019 $1,000,000 100 2039 $1,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,000,000 New Bond Totals $6,034,000 $6,034,000 Totals 834,434,566 $3,610,887 $677,797 $3,610,887 $677,797 $30,823,679 QIOWADOT City Street Financial Report Form 517007 {5-2019} Office of Local Systems Ames, IA 50010 City Name sown Crry Cih SwnUer 3715 Project Final Costs Sheet For construction, reconstruction, and improvement projects with costs equal to or greater than 90% of the bid threshold in effect as the beginning of the fiscal year. Check here if there are no entities for this year ❑ Project Final Costs Sheet (Section A) 9/1920197:54 AM Fsrrl Year 2019 5 o 11 1. Project Number 12. Estimated Cost 13. Project Type 14. Public Letting? 15. Location/Project Description (limits, length, size of structure) L3322 $998,000 SURF Yes 2017 Hebl Avenue Improvements E4520-2017 $70,000 RDSD Yes Camp Cardinal Blvd. & Lower West Branch Road Landscape Improvements Project Final Costs Sheet (Section B) 1. Project Number 6. Contractor Name 7. Contract Price 8. Additions/ Deductions 9. Labor 10. Equipment 11. Materials 12. Overhead 13. Total L3322 Peterson Contractors, Inc. $943,064 -$23,870 $0 $0 $0 $0 $919,194 E4520-2017 Suburban Landscape $56,175 $810 $0 $0 $0 $0 $56,985 QIOWADOT Form 517007 {5-2019} Office of Local Systems Ames, IA 50010 City Name sown Crry C ih SwnUer 3715 City Street Financial Report Road/Street Equipment Inventory Sheet 9/1920197:54 AM Fs al Year 2019 6 o 11 1. Local Class I.D. # 2. Model Year 3. Description 4. Purchase Cost 5. Lease Cost /Unit 6. Rental Cost /Unit 7. Used On Project this FY? 8. Status 268 2015 Street Sweeper Elgin Pelican Dual $187,000 $0 $0 No NOCH 306 2016 1 Ton Utility Cargo Van Ford E350 KUV $34,076 $0 $0 No NOCH 227 2016 13200 GVWR Utility Chevrolet 3500 $42,362 $0 $0 No NOCH 222 2011 Chevrolet Colorado Extended Cab 4X4 $20,599 $0 $0 No SOLD 302 2010 19,500 GVWR 1-1/2 Ton Basket Truck Ford F550 $80,629 $0 $0 No NOCH 259 2010 Street Sweeper Allianz -Johnston 3000 $158,369 $0 $0 No SOLD 224 2009 Vibratory Roller Bomag BW120AD4 $33,840 $0 $0 No NOCH 203 2010 38000 GVWR Dump Truck/Freightliner M2106V $105,000 $0 $0 No NOCH 204 2010 38000 GVWR Dump Truck/Freightliner M2106V $105,000 $0 $0 No NOCH 205 2010 38000 GVWR Dump Truck/Freightliner M2106V $105,000 $0 $0 No NOCH 208 2010 38000 GVWR Dump Truck/Freightliner M2106V $105,000 $0 $0 No NOCH 210 2010 38000 GVWR Dump Truck/Freightliner M2106V $105,000 $0 $0 No NOCH 211 2010 38000 GVWR Dump Truck/Freightliner M2106V $105,000 $0 $0 No NOCH 245 2009 40000 GVWR Dump Tmck/Intemational 7300 $101,339 $0 $0 No SOLD 269 2008 Street Sweeper/Allianz-Johnston 3000SP $137,544 $0 $0 No SOLD 293 2004 Craftco Magnum Spray Asphalt Patcher $50,645 $0 $0 No NOCH 233 1996 Crack Sealer/ Craftco EZ100D $16,400 $0 $0 No TRAD 236 2003 Loader -Backhoe / John Deere 31 OSG $59,125 $0 $0 No TRAD 243 1993 Air Compressor/ Ingersol P185CWJD $11,200 $0 $0 No NOCH QIOWADOT Fom1517007 {5-2019} Office of Local Systems Ames, IA 50010 City Name IOWA CITY City Street Financial Report Road/Street Equipment Inventory Sheet 9/1920197:54 AM Fsrrl Year 2019 7 o 11 1. Local Class I.D. # 2. Model Year 3. Description 4. Purchase Cost 5. Lease Cost /Unit 6. Rental Cost /Unit 7. Used On Project this FY? 8. Status 244 1998 Air Compressor/ Ingersol P185CWJ D $11,200 $0 $0 No NOCH 280 2004 Concrete Saw/ Target Pro 35 III $8,584 $0 $0 No NOCH 294 2000 Mud Jack/Airplaco HJ25 $23,067 $0 $0 No SOLD 312 2001 Aerial Platform / Intemational Elliott 4700 $101,129 $0 $0 No NOCH 206 2008 1/2 Ton 4 X 4 Pickup/Ford F-150 $20,696 $0 $0 No SOLD 207 2000 John Deere/Motor Grader 772CH $130,000 $0 $0 No NOCH 232B 2012 550 Ib Concrete Breaker Stanley MB05502 $5,990 $0 $0 No NOCH 230 2012 Endloader/Case 721F $127,750 $0 $0 No NOCH 241B 2012 550 Ib. Concrete Breaker/Stanley MB05502 $5,990 $0 $0 No JUNK 298 2012 Asphalt Pothole Patcher/Falcon 2T 1 Bumer $20,036 $0 $0 No NOCH 276 2014 37240 GVWR Flusher Truck/Freightliner 108SD $121,016 $0 $0 No NOCH 288 2014 37240 GVWR Dump Truck/Freightliner 108SD $118,334 $0 $0 No NOCH 290 2014 37240 GVWR Dump Truck/Freightliner 108SD $118,334 $0 $0 No NOCH 291 2014 37240 GVWR Dump Truck/Freightliner 108SD $118,334 $0 $0 No NOCH 292 2014 37240 GVWR Dump Truck/Freightliner 108SD $118,334 $0 $0 No NOCH 202 2014 1/2 Ton Flatbed/Ford F1504 X2 $24,685 $0 $0 No NOCH 212 2015 14000 GVWR Flatbed/Ford F3504 X 4 $49,116 $0 $0 No NOCH 213 2015 13700 GVWR Flatbed/Ford F3504 X 2 $38,844 $0 $0 No NOCH 229 2013 Endloader/Case 621F $120,644 $0 $0 No NOCH 232 2014 Skidloader/Bobcat 5650 $41,779 $0 $0 No NOCH QIOWADOT Fom1517007 {5-2019} Office of Local Systems Ames, IA 50010 City Name IOWA CITY City Street Financial Report Road/Street Equipment Inventory Sheet 9/1920197:54 AM Fsrrl Year 2019 8 o 11 1. Local Class I.D. # 2. Model Year 3. Description 4. Purchase Cost 5. Lease Cost /Unit 6. Rental Cost /Unit 7. Used On Project this FY? 8. Status 239 2015 13700 GVWR Flatbed/Ford F3504 X 2 $37,873 $0 $0 No NOCH 240 2015 14000 GVWR Flatbed/Ford F3504 X 4 $47,260 $0 $0 No NOCH 241 2014 Skidloader/Bobcat 5650 $42,111 $0 $0 No NOCH 248 2015 13700 GVWR Utility/Ford F3504 X 2 $43,412 $0 $0 No NOCH 308 2014 1/2 Ton Pickup/Ford F1504 X2 $24,042 $0 $0 No NOCH 220 2016 Meassage Board TrailerNer-Mac PCMS-548 $15,250 $0 $0 No NOCH 252 2017 38720 GVWR Dump Truck/Freightliner 108SD $152,625 $0 $0 No NOCH 253 2017 38720 GVWR Dump Truck/Freightliner 108SD $175,099 $0 $0 No NOCH 307 2017 Sign Truck/Ford F550 $127,149 $0 $0 No NOCH 215 2018 1/2 Ton Pickup/Ford F150XL $28,745 $0 $0 No NOCH 237 2018 Track Excavator/Case CX145D-SR $156,163 $0 $0 No NOCH 242 2018 Air Compressor/Sullivan Palatek D185PIZ4 $18,946 $0 $0 No NOCH 254 2017 Concrete Drill/EZ Drill 210B $12,054 $0 $0 No NOCH 289 2018 38720 GVWR Dump Truck/Freightliner 108SD $159,601 $0 $0 No NOCH 315 2017 Street Paint Machine/Graco Linelazer5900 $7,750 $0 $0 No NOCH 316 2017 Street Paint Machine/EZ-Liner AL-120EZ $54,566 $0 $0 No NOCH 206 2018 1/2 Ton Pickup/Ford F150XL4X4 Crew Cab $31,145 $0 $0 No NEW 222 2019 Compact Pickup/Chevrolet Colorado 4X4 Crew Cab $28,759 $0 $0 No NEW 233 2018 Crack Sealer/Crafco SS1250 $40,274 $0 $0 No NEW 236 2019 Loader Backhoe/John Deere 310SL $101,691 $0 $0 No NEW QIOWADOT Fom1517007 {5-2019} Office of Local Systems Ames, IA 50010 City Name IOWA CITY City Street Financial Report Road/Street Equipment Inventory Sheet 9/19/20197:54 AM Fsrrl Year 2019 9 o 11 1. Local Class I.D. # 2. Model Year 3. Description 4. Purchase Cost 5. Lease Cost /Unit 6. Rental Cost /Unit 7. Used On Project this FY? 8. Status 241B 2019 500 lb Concrete Breaker/Stanley MB05 $6,350 $0 $0 No NEW 245 2019 38000 GVWR Dump Truck/Freightliner 108SD $153,123 $0 $0 No NEW 255 2019 Vibratory Roller/Wacker Neuson RD12A-90 $13,899 $0 $0 No NEW 269 2018 Street Sweeper/Elgin Pelican Dual $210,039 $0 $0 No NEW QIOWADOT Fom1517007 {5-2019} Office of Local Systems Ames, IA 50010 City Name IOWA CITY City Street Financial Report Explanation Sheet 9/1920197:54 AM Fsrrl Year 2019 10 of 11 the Bonds, Notes and Loans Sheet there is an entry for $1,000,000.00. The selection for Debt Type is General Obligation, Special Assessment or Short Term es/Loans. This is actually a Long Term Inter -fund Loan. QIOWADOT Fomi517007 {5-2019} Office of Local Systems Ames, IA 50010 City Name sown Crry Cih SwnUer 3715 City Street Financial Report Monthly Payment Sheet Month Road Use tax Payments July $647,185.14 August $1,026,087.70 September $984,551.24 October $608,278.02 November $760,843.23 December $770,300.72 January $740,422.02 February 1$733,756.87 March $597,647.81 April $369,334.78 May $818,125.60 June $710,268.38 Totals $8,766,801.51 9/1920197:54 AM Fsrrl Year 2019 11 of 11 U. Prepared by: Sara Sproule, Assistant Controller, & Ron Knoche, Public Works Director, 410 E. Washington St., Iowa City, IA 52240, 319-356-5088/5138 Resolution No. 19-233 Resolution approving the City Street Financial Report for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2019. Whereas, the State of Iowa under Iowa Code Section 312.14 requires all cities to submit the Street Financial Report (SFR) to the Iowa Department of Transportation (DOT) by September 30 of each year. Now, therefore, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa, that the City Street Financial Report for the period beginning July 1, 2018, through June 30, 2019, be approved. Passed and approved this 17th day of September , 2019. Ma or Attest: City Clerk <f Approved by City Attorney's Office It was moved by Salih and seconded by Cole the Resolution be adopted, and upon roll call there were: Ayes: Nays: Absent: Cole Mims Salih Taylor Teague Thomas Throgmorton Item Number: 6.e. �, CITY OF IOWA CITY �'�COUNCIL ACTION REPORT September 17, 2019 Resolution amending the budgeted positions in the Senior Center by adding one .36 FTE Receptionist - Senior Center position and increasing a .5 FTE Receptionist - Senior Center position to .63 FTE. Prepared By: Ashley Monroe, Assistant City Manager Karen Jennings, Human Resources Administrator LaTasha DeLoach, Senior Center Coordinator Reviewed By: Geoff Fruin, City Manager Fiscal Impact: Up to $36,988.54 from the General Fund and Employee Benefits Fund. ($28,266.68 for one new .63 FTE and an additional $8,721.86 for change from .5 FTE to .63 FTE) Recommendations: Staff: Approval Commission: N/A Attachments: Resolution Executive Summary: At the September 3, 2019 Work Session, City Council directed the City Manager to select three hourly positions to be converted to permanent status positions. The City Manager determined that converting the hourly Senior Center Clerical Assistant position to a .63 FTE Receptionist will best serve the City's current operations. This position change will be in effect upon resolution approval. Senior Center will proceed with posting positions as required by Iowa State Code and the Local #183 AFSCME contract. Background /Analysis: City Council requested an analysis of hourly positions working year-round, weekly schedules of approximately 20-24 hours per week. The Center has for several years, been operating with a permanent status morning Receptionist working 20 hours per week and an hourly Receptionist Assistant, working approximately 25 hours weekly, in the afternoons. Based on current AFSCME contract, position responsibilities for non -permanent staff cannot be the same as responsibilities for permanent status staff. Creating two 0.63 Receptionist positions at the Senior Center will create equitable duties and responsibilities. Duties for the Receptionist includes greeting visitors in-person and by phone, registering participants, and assisting with general office clerical tasks. A change to permanent status will slightly increase the minimum required experience and skills. Altering the work hours for the current a.m. Receptionist from 0.50 FTE to 0.63 FTE will allow for overlapping midday staffing coverage. This Resolution will make the afternoon Receptionist position permanent, eligible for benefits and union status. No supervisory changes are necessary and position supervision remains the responsibility of the Senior Center Coordinator. Costs are variable, up to $36.988.54 in FY2020, based upon whether hired employees choose City -provided health insurance. ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution (0. e, Prepared by: LaTasha DeLoach, Senior Center Coordinator, 28 S. Linn St., Iowa City, IA 52.240 (319) 356-5225 Resolution Number 19-234 Resolution amending the budgeted positions in the Senior Center by adding one .63 FTE Receptionist — Senior Center position and increasing a.5 FTE Receptionist — Senior Center position to .63 FTE. Whereas, Resolution No. 19-79 adopted by the City Council on March 12, 2019, authorized budgeted positions in the Senior Center for Fiscal Year 2020; and Whereas, City Council directed the City Manager to select three hourly positions to be converted to permanent positions; and Whereas, the City Manager determined that the City would be best served by converting the hourly Senior Center Clerical Assistant position to a .63 FTE Receptionist - Senior Center position; and Whereas, to provide continuity of service at The Center's front desk the .5 FTE Receptionist - Senior Center position will be increased to .63 FTE. Now Therefore, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa that: The budgeted positions in the Senior Center be amended by adding: 1. One .63 FTE Receptionist -Senior Center position, AFSCME grade 2. 2. Increasing one .5 FTE Receptionist -Senior Center position to .63 FTE, AFSCME grade 2. Passed and approved this 17th day of September 2019 v Ma or .41 ApTi5ved by Attest: ��_ I Cit Clerk City Attorney's Office It was moved by Salih and seconded by Cole the Resolution be adopted, and upon roll call there were: AYES: 05 NAYS: ABSENT: Cole Mims Salih Taylor Teague Thomas Throgmorton Item Number: 6.f. ®4 CITY OF IOWA CITY u► �� COUNCIL ACTION REPORT September 17, 2019 Resolution Authorizing the Procurement of a Microsoft Enterprise Agreement Prepared By: Michael Harapat, ITS Coordinator June Nasby, Buyer I I Reviewed By: Dennis Bockenstedt, Finance Director Ashley Monroe, Assistant City Manager Fiscal Impact: Pricing for the Enterprise Agreement is based on the three-year term with the option to renew at the end of three years. The first three years of the agreement will be $175,490.24 per year. Recommendations: Staff: Commission: N/A Attachments: Resolution Executive Summary: The City of Iowa City has been purchasing Microsoft Office software licenses, desktop operating systems, server applications, and server operating systems on a Enterprise Level Agreement with Microsoft over the last three years. As the ITS department continues to expand the virtual desktop environment at the City and more divisions use remote access, ITS will need to purchase and manage more Microsoft software licenses. ITS has sought out a way to make the City's purchasing and management of Microsoft licenses more unified, cost efficient and easier to manage. ITS has determined that the best way to minimize costs and maximize efficiency for Microsoft licensing is to maintain the Enterprise Agreement. An Enterprise Agreement is an organization -wide volume licensing agreement for Microsoft services and software. It will allow the City to continue buy certain Microsoft licenses as a package for a certain number of users at a lower cost than if it bought the licenses individually. The Enterprise Agreement will also have new management tools, such as automatic software updates for Microsoft Office, amongst others. Background /Analysis: City ITS staff began looking into a Microsoft Enterprise Solution in the spring of 2016. The State of Iowa has a Master Agreement for the purchase of such IT hardware, software, and services with Insight Public Sector, Inc. which it entered in May 2016 through a cooperative purchasing process led by the County of Fairfax, Virginia. Insight Public Sector, Inc. was awarded the contract with the County of Fairfax, and Microsoft products, services, and solutions are included in the scope of services for that agreement. The State of Iowa, by agreement with Insight Public Sector, Inc., has authorized Iowa cities to purchase products and services under Fairfax County's agreement with I nsight in lieu of a separate competitive selection process. The City will be able to use the terms and conditions that were negotiated through Fairfax County's competitive process. The City will benefit from the reduction of administrative expenses due to the cooperative agreement. The proposed Enterprise Agreement with Microsoft will have a three year term with a three year extension, and include licensing for Microsoft Office 365, Windows Server 2016, SQL Server 2016, and user access licensing. ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution Prepared by: Michael Harapat, ITS Coordinator, 410 E Washington, Iowa City, IA 52240 (319)356-5422 Resolution No. 19-235 Resolution authorizing the procurement of a Microsoft Enterprise Agreement for the City of Iowa City Whereas, the City of Iowa City has been purchasing Microsoft Office software licenses, desktop operating systems, server applications, and server operating systems on a per machine basis over the last 10 plus years; and Whereas, as the ITS Division expands the virtual desktop environment at the City and more divisions use remote access, ITS will need to purchase and manage more Microsoft software licenses; and Whereas, ITS staff has sought out a way to make the City's purchasing and management of Microsoft licenses more unified, cost efficient and easier to manage; and Whereas, ITS has determined that the best way to minimize costs and maximize efficiency for Microsoft licensing is to enter into an Enterprise Agreement; and Whereas, an Enterprise Agreement is an organization -wide volume licensing agreement for Microsoft services and software; and Whereas, a Microsoft Enterprise Agreement can be purchased through a national cooperative technology purchasing agreement with Insight Public Sector Inc. that has been authorized by the State of Iowa municipalities to purchase technology products through; and Whereas, the proposed Enterprise Agreement with Microsoft will have a three-year term with a three-year extension, and include licensing for Microsoft Office 365, Windows Server 2016, SQL Server 2016, and user access licensing; and Whereas, the cost of the agreement for the initial three-year term plus the three-year extension is $526,470.72 or $175,490.24 per year, which exceeds the City Manager's spending authority of $150,000, thus requiring City Council approval; and Whereas, funds for the purchase of the Enterprise Agreement will be provided by the ITS account number 83310510-476130 and the budget object number 446190 in all department budgets; and Whereas, approval of this procurement is in the public interest. Now, therefore, be it resolved, by the City Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa, that: 1. The proposed procurement as described above is approved. 2. The City Manager is authorized to sign said Enterprise Agreement and any amendments to or renewals of said Agreement. Passed and approved this 17th day of September , 20 19 G, Miryor Resolution No. 19-235 Page 2 Attest: Ci y Clerk It was move by salih and seconded by adopted, and upon roll call there were: AYES: NAYS: roved b q-12 Jj City Attorney's Office Cole the Resolution be ABSENT: Cole Mims Salih Taylor Teague Thomas Throgmorton Item Number: 6.g. I �, CITY OF IOWA CITY �'�COUNCIL ACTION REPORT September 17, 2019 Resolution authorizing the Mayor to sign and the City Clerk to attest a storm sewer and drainage easement agreement with Del Ray Ridge, LP for 628 S. Dubuque Street. Prepared By: Eleanor Dilkes, City Attorney Reviewed By: Geoff Fruin, City Manager Ron Knoche. Public Works Director Ben Clark, Senior Civil Engineer Fiscal Impact: Per Resolution No. 19-25 the City, by grant to Del Ray LP, the owner of the affordable housing project being constructed at 628 S. Dubuque Street, has assisted in covering the unanticipated project costs due to the existence of the old sanitary sewer line. The original grant of $150,000 will be increased by $8,500 to cover the costs attributable to allowing the old line to be repurposed as a storm sewer line serving the Depot. Recommendations: Staff: Approval Commission: N/A Attachments: Resolution Executive Summary: By resolution No. 19-93 the City Council authorized the Mayor to sign and the Clerk to attest a Quit Claim Deed for property known as 628 S. Dubuque Street following the relocation of the sanitary sewer line that was partially located under the affordable housing project being constructed at that location. The sanitary sewer has been relocated and the former line is being repurposed as the storm sewer line for the Railroad Depot property located at 119 Wright Street. City staff has approved the location of the storm sewer line, as well as the associated easement agreement. Background /Analysis: ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution Prepared by: Eleanor M. Dilkes, City Attorney, 410 E. Washington St., Iowa City, IA 52240, 3565030 RESOLUTION NO. 19-236 Resolution authorizing the Mayor to sign and the City Clerk to attest a storm sewer and drainage easement agreement with Del Ray Ridge, LP for 628 S. Dubuque Street WHEREAS, by resolution No. 19-93 the City Council authorized the Mayor to sign and the Clerk to attest a Quit Claim Deed for property known as 628 S. Dubuque Street following the relocation of the sanitary sewer line that was partially located under the building to be constructed; and WHEREAS, the sanitary sewer has been relocated and the former line is being repurposed as the storm sewer line for the Railroad Depot property located at 119 Wright Street; and WHEREAS, City staff has approved the location of the storm sewer line, as well as the associated easement agreement; and WHEREAS, the execution of the easement agreement and acceptance of the easement is in the public interest and advances the public health, safety and welfare of the residents of Iowa City, Iowa. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF IOWA CITY, IOWA, THAT: The City does hereby accept the dedication of a storm sewer easement as described above. 2. The Mayor is hereby authorized to sign and the City Clerk to attest the easement agreement approved by the City Attorney. 3. The City Attorney is authorized to deliver the easement agreement to the Developer and to carry out any other actions necessary to effectuate the easement as required by law. Passed and approved this 17th day of Se to ber 919. MA OR ATTEST: All APPROVED BY: CI CLERK City Attorney's Office Resolution No. 19-236 Page 2 It was moved by Salih and seconded by Cole Resolution be adopted, and upon roll call there were: AYES: NAYS: " " Cole Mims Salih Taylor Teague Thomas Throgmorton the Item Number: 6.h. 'r AL CITY OF IOWA CITY =� COUNCIL ACTION REPORT September 17, 2019 Resolution authorizing the City Manager to sign an agreement with Public Space One, Inc. (PS 1) for community programming and to maintain the City's current mortgage on the property at 730 S. Dubuque St. Prepared By: Simon Andrew, Assistant to the City Manager Reviewed By: Sue Dulek, Assistant City Attorney Fiscal Impact: None Recommendations: Staff: Approval Commission: N/A Attachments: Resolution Agreement Executive Summary: The City currently has operating and loan agreements with Public Access Television, Inc.(PATV) for community programming and a mortgage the City holds on PATV's property at 730 S. Dubuque Street. PATV intends to merge organizations with Public Space One, Inc. ("PS1") and convey the property to PS1. Under the current agreement, PATV is obligated to repay the loan to the City if that organization ceases to provide public access programming. This new agreement with PS1 would maintain the City's current interest in the property and ensures the property will continue to be used for community programming and gathering spaces. Background /Analysis: For many years the City has had an operating agreement with PATV requiring community programming that was broadcast on local cable television. Additionally, the City provided a $125,000 loan to PATV in 2001 to assist in the purchase and renovation of their current property at 730 S. Dubuque Street. The loan does not accrue interest and does not require regular payments. The City holds a mortgage on the property behind the primary mortgage from a private lender. The City's loan becomes due if PATV ceases to provide community programming or sells the building. PATV also leases a portion of the building to Uptown Bills, a gathering space and coffee shop provided by the Extend the Dream Foundation. Uptown Bills provides the community spaces for meetings and performances. PATV has decided to merge organizations with PS1 and cease to be a legal entity. In order to maintain the City's interest in the property, support community programming, and maintain performance space, the City must enter into an agreement with PS1, the entity that will now own and operate the facility. This new agreement requires PS1 to continue to provide programming in much the same manner as PATV, though productions will no longer be broadcast on cable television. The loan will continue to be no interest, and repayment required if PS1 ceases to provide programming or sells the property. PS1 has indicated that merging with PATV fits well with their mission and also provides a much needed replacement for the performance space PS 1 is losing as the organization moves into their new home on Gilbert St. Staff recommends approval. Entering into an agreement with PS1 to maintain the City's mortgage on the property ensures the continuation of community programming, helps maintain meeting and performance spaces, and maintains the City's long-term interest in the property itself. ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution Agreement Ashley Platz Y From: Simon Andrew Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2019 3:48 PM Late�W�� Distributed To: Council Subject: FW: Public Space One, item 6h tonight (Date) From: John Engelbrecht[mailto:john@publicspaceone.comj Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2019 2:31 PM To: Jim Throgmorton <Jim-Throgmorton@iowa-city.org>; John Thomas <John-Thomas@iowa-city.org>; Bruce Teague <Bruce-Teague@iowa-city.org>; Pauline Taylor <Pauline-Taylor@iowa-city.org>; Mazahir Salih <Mazahir-Salih@iowa- city.org>; Susan Mims <Susan-Mims@iowa-city.org>; Rockne Cole <Rockne-Cole@iowa-city.org> Cc: Geoff Fruin <Geoff-Fruin@iowa-city.org>; Simon Andrew <Simon-Andrew@iowa-city.org> Subject: Public Space One, item 6h tonight Dear City Council members, I'm sorry I won't be able to attend the meeting tonight to answer questions about the minor item on the consent agenda (item 6h) re: Public Space One, but wanted to share my perspective on this topic and what approval of it allows. From my conversations with Geoff and Simon, this shouldn't be a controversial item. PS1 has been working with PAN over the course of late spring and summer to fold their mission into a program we will run (aka to merge our nonprofits; PS1 as the surviving entity). This is an endeavor that coincidentally (and charitably) developed in tandem with our move from Wesley into 225/229, and has been the undisclosed (to the public, up until this packet went out) answer to our loss of a stage and performance area at Wesley. We are excited to re -calibrate the PAN mission under the PS1 banner and bring our collective, people -powered spirit to their same cause in the building they currently inhabit (w/ Uptown Bill's) which we are set to take ownership of on Oct 1. Our board has approved signing off on this resolution and we hope the City Council allows the agreement to continue by signing off on the new resolution with us as well. Thanks for your thought, time, and vision. We look forward to continuing the grassroots work of building Iowa City's arts ecosystem. Sincerely, John t Prepared by: Simon Andrew, Asst to the City Manager 410 E. Washington St., Iowa City, IA 52240 (319) 356-5014 Resolution No. 19-237 Resolution authorizing the City Manager to sign an agreement with Public Space One, Inc. for community programming and to maintain the City's current mortgage on the property at 730 S. Dubuque St. Whereas, Public Access Television, Inc. ("PATV") has provided public access and community programming on cable television pursuant to a written agreement with the City for nearly thirty (30) years; Whereas, to support PATV's mission, the City provided a $125,000 loan to PAN in 2001 for partial funding to purchase and improve 730 S. Dubuque Street, Iowa City, Iowa, legally described as: The south 60.4 feet of Lot 5 in Block 18, in that part of Iowa City, Iowa, laid off by the Commissioners of Johnson County, Iowa as the County Seat of Johnson County, Iowa, according to the plat thereof recorded in Book 1 &2, page 253, Deed Records of Johnson County, Iowa ("property"); Whereas, the City provided the loan to PATV pursuant to an agreement ("PATV loan agreement"), evidence by a promissory note ("PAN note"), and secured by a mortgage on the property ("PATV mortgage"); Whereas, PATV has decided to merge with PS1 and dissolve; Whereas, under the terms of the PATV loan agreement and PATV note, PATV is obligated to repay the loan to the City if it dissolves or fails to provide community programming services; Whereas, PS1 is willing to acquire the property and continue to provide community programming in exchange for a loan of $125,000 from the City and the City forgiving the PATV note and releasing the PATV mortgage. Now, therefore, be in resolved by the City Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa that: The City Manager is authorized to sign the attached agreement with Public Space One, Inc. Passed and approved this 17th day of September 2019. f � M or Approved Attest:��� - I d Ci y Clerk `� c) City Attorney's Office Resolution No. 19-237 Page 2 It was moved by salih and seconded by Cole Resolution be adopted, and upon roll call there were: AYES: NAYS: x x x x x x x F\ Cole Mins Sau Taylor Teague Thomas Tluogmorton the AGREEMENT FOR LOAN AND COMMUNITY PROGRAMMING This Agreement for Loan and Community Programming (the "Agreement') is made between Public Space One, Inc., an Iowa nonprofit corporation, ("PSI") and the City of Iowa City, Iowa, a municipal corporation, (the "City") in Iowa City, Iowa. WHEREAS, Public Access Television, Inc. ('PATV") has provided public access and community programming on cable television pursuant to a written agreement with the City for nearly thirty (30) years; WHEREAS, to support PATV's mission, the City provided a $125,000 loan to PATV in 2001 for partial funding to purchase and improve 730 S. Dubuque Street, Iowa City, Iowa, (the "PATV Loan") legally described as: The south 60.4 feet of Lot 5 in Block 18, in that part of Iowa City, Iowa, laid off by the Commissioners of Johnson County, Iowa as the County Seat of Johnson County, Iowa, according to the plat thereof recorded in Book 1 &2, page 253, Deed Records of Johnson County, Iowa (the "Property"); WHEREAS, the City provided the loan to PATV pursuant to an agreement ("PATV Loan Agreement"), evidence by a promissory note ("PATV Note"), and secured by a mortgage on the Property ("PATV Mortgage"); WHEREAS, PATV has decided to merge with PSI and dissolve; WHEREAS, under the terms of the PATV Loan Agreement and PATV Note, PATV is obligated to repay the PATV Loan to the City if it dissolves or fails to provide community programming services; and WHEREAS, PSI is willing to acquire the Property and continue to provide community programming in exchange for assuming the PATV Loan and PATV Loan Agreement, and the City forgiving the PATV Note and releasing the PATV Mortgage. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. Loan. In consideration of the City forgiving the PATV Note and releasing the PATV Mortgage, PSI promises to pay the PATV Loan as provided herein. No interest shall accrue on the PATV Loan. PSI shall not be obligated to make payments on the PATV Loan unless the City declares PSI in default of the terms of this agreement as provided herein. 2. Mortgage. PSI shall grant the City a mortgage on the property to secure this Agreement to be recorded at PS1's cost (the "PSI Mortgage"). Said PSI Mortgage shall be junior to the primary mortgage on the property held by Hills Bank and Trust Company. 19 3. PSI Obligations. PSI shall: A. Occupy the Property, in whole or part, for the purpose of providing community programming. Content shall be distributed free of charge and does not need to be broadcast on a cable television provider. B. Provide alcohol free performance space at the Property to persons of all ages. C. Provide free meeting space at the Property for community organizations, similar to the meeting rooms available at the Iowa City Public Library, D. Not sell or convey any legal or equitable interest in the Property without the City's written consent. Notwithstanding any other provision herein, PSI may continue to lease a portion of the Property to Extend the Dream Foundation, Inc. or other tenants. E. Remain a private, non-profit corporation under the laws of the State of Iowa. 4. Community Pro ramming. For purposes of this Agreement, community programming includes, but is not limited to the following services to residents of the Iowa City area: Professional staff and trainers for producer support; operate training workshops in media production; make available media production equipment; assist with providing media access to programs produced or provided by members of the Iowa City community; and provide nonprofit community based graphic messaging. 5. Default/Notice. In the event that the City determines that PSI has defaulted in the performance of any of its obligations under this Agreement, the City may declare that default has occurred and give notice thereof to PSI. Notice of default shall be given in writing, shall specify the nature of the default and the provision of this Agreement involved, and shall specify what action is required to correct the default. PSI shall have thirty (30) days from the date of its receipt of the notice of default to correct the default. If at the end of said thirty (30) -day period the default has not, in the opinion of the City, been corrected, the City may demand immediate repayment of the PATV Loan, foreclose the PSI Mortgage, and pursue all lawful remedies. Notice will be deemed to be delivered, and thus effective, when personally received, or received by United States Mail, postage prepaid, certified mail return receipt requested, or receipt is refused. Such notices shall be addressed as follows: a. If to PSI, to: Public Space One, Inc. 730 S. Dubuque Street Iowa City, lA 52245 With a copy to: David J. Bright Pugh Hagan Prahm PLC 425 E. Oakdale Boulevard, Suite 201 Coralville, IA 52241 b. If to the City, to: City Attorney City of Iowa City 410 East Washington sheet Iowa City, IA 52240 6. Amendment All amendments shall be in in writing. 7. Non-Assienabiliri. PSI shall not assign this Agreement without the City's written consent. g. Nondiscrimination. PSI shall not discriminate against any person in employment or public accommodation because of race, religion, color, creed, gender identity, sex, national origin, sexual orientation, mental or physical disability, marital status or age. "Employment" shall include but not be limited to hiring, accepting, registering, classifying, promoting, or referring to employment. 9. Integration. This Agreement contains the entire understanding of the parties. 10. Conflict of Laws and Venue. The laws of the State of Iowa shall govern this Agreement, and venue for any legal action hereunder shall be in the Johnson County District Court of Iowa or the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Iowa. 11. Severability. If any provision or provisions of this Agreement shall be held to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable, the validity, legality and enforceability of the remaining provisions shall not in any way be affected or impaired thereby. 12. Attorneys' Fees, Costs and Expenses. Each party shall be responsible for its own attorneys' fees, costs and expenses arising from the negotiation and drafting of this Agreement and any claims for enforcement or breach of said Agreement. Date: September 17th , 2019. By: RUBLI ACE ON SPE, INC. ti Nm-lffngelhrecht, Director CITY OF IOWA By: G6W Fruin, City Manager Item Number: 7.a. +r p- W�rm�M CITY O� IOWA CITY www.icgov.org September 17, 2019 Motion setting a public hearing for October 1, 2019 on an ordinance amending the Riverfront Crossings regulating plan to include the property located at 625 S. Gilbert Street in the Central Crossing Subdistrict. (ZCA19- 03) ATTACHMENTS: Description PZ Staff Report w Attachments To: Planning and Zoning Commission Item: REZ19-07 / ZCA19-03 E Prentiss & S Gilbert GENERAL INFORMATION: Applicant: Property Owner: Requested Action: Purpose: Location: Location Map: Boni C ®L9�hl' �C•C`T - �; w 19T F. j/ STAFF REPORT Prepared by: Jade Pederson, Planning Intern and Anne Russett, Senior Planner Date: August 15, 2019 Davis Maxwell Capstone Collegiate Communities, LLC 431 Office Park Drive Birmingham, AL 35223 dmaxwell@capstonemail.com 205-414-6438 Boyd Investments 625 S Gilbert Street Iowa City, IA 52240 319-321-5152 Regulating plan amendment from Gilbert Subdistrict to Central Crossings Subdistrict Rezoning from Intensive Commercial (CI -1) and Community Commercial (CC -2) to Riverfront Crossings — Central Crossings (RFC -CX). Redevelopment of the site per the Riverfront Crossing's form -based code 305 & 315 E Prentiss St. & 625 S Gilbert St. Iowa City, IA Size: Existing Land Use and Zoning Surrounding Land Use and Zoning Comprehensive Plan: Neighborhood Open Space District Public Meeting Notification: File Date: 45 Day Limitation Period: BACKGROUND INFORMATION: K 1.6 Acres Two office buildings zoned Intensive Commercial (CI -1) and one apartment zoned Community Commercial (CC -2) North: RFC -SD — Riverfront Crossings -South District (Office and Commercial) PRM — Planned High Density Multi - Family Residential (Condominiums) South: CC -2 — Community Commercial (Mixed - Use and Commercial) CI -1 — Intensive Commercial (Office) East: RM -44 — High Density Multi -Family Residential (Residential) CC -2 — Community Commercial (Commercial) West: RFC -CX — Riverfront Crossings -Central Crossings (Multi -family residential) Downtown and Riverfront Crossings Master Plan C7 Property owners located within 300 feet of the project site received notification of the Planning and Zoning Commission public meeting. August 1, 2019 September 16, 2019 The applicant, Davis Maxwell representing Capstone Collegiate Communities, LLC, has requested the following: 1. An amendment to the Riverfront Crossings regulating plan (14-2G-2): The project site is located within the Central Crossings and Gilbert Subdistricts of the Riverfront Crossings District. The properties located at 305 and 315 East Prentiss are within the Central Crossings Subdistrict while the 625 South Gilbert Street property is within the Gilbert Subdistrict. The applicant has requested that the regulating plan be amended to include the 625 South Gilbert Street property in the Central Crossings subdistrict. 2. A rezoning from Intensive Commercial (CI -1) and Community Commercial (CC -2) to Riverfront Crossings — Central Crossings (RFC -CX) for 1.6 acres at 305 and 315 East Prentiss Street and 625 South Gilbert Street. 3 At the time this staff report was published the applicant had not held a good neighbor meeting. ANALYSIS: Current Zoning: Zone District. - The property at 305 East Prentiss Street is currently zoned Community Commercial (CC -2). The additional two properties, at 315 East Prentiss Street and 625 South Gilbert Street, are currently zoned Intensive Commercial (CI -1). The purpose of the Community Commercial (CC -2) zone is to provide services, that are in a major business district, to a significant portion of community. The primary uses of the CC -2 zone are for commercial, retail, and office. The Intensive Commercial Zone (CI -1) zone is intended "to provide areas for those sales and service functions whose operations are typically characterized by outdoor display and storage of merchandise, repair and sales of large equipment or motor vehicles, outdoor commercial amusement and recreation activities, or by operations conducted in buildings or structures that are not completely enclosed." Residential uses are not an allowed use in the CI -1 zone. Regulating Plan: The project property falls into two different subdistricts of the Riverfront Crossings District. The lot located at 625 South Gilbert Street is in the Gilbert Subdistrict and the lots located at 305 and 315 East Prentiss Street are in the Central Crossings Subdistrict. While the two subdistricts do still fall within the same general guidelines of the Downtown & Riverfront Crossings Master Plan, they both have distinctive objectives, regulations, and standards that they follow. The most notable differences and similarities between the subdistricts include standards pertaining to land uses, base max height, and max bonus height. Figure 1 shows some of the standards of the Central Crossings and Gilbert Subdistricts. Figure 1. Central Crossings Subdistrict Gilbert Subdistrict Land Uses Same as CB -5 zone: Same as C13-5 zone: -Provisional residential use -Provisional residential use -Most commercial use -Most commercial use -Provisional industrial use -Provisional industrial use -Most institutional and civic uses -Most institutional and civic uses Base Height Maximum 4 floors 3 floors Bonus Height 8 floors 5 floors Maximum ri Proposed Zoning: Zone District.• The proposed Riverfront Crossings — Central Crossings Subdistrict (RFC -CX) zone is "intended for moderate intensity mixed use development in buildings with entries opening onto pedestrian friendly streets and sidewalks." Other properties that surround the subject property and have the RFC -CX zone are to the west. RFC -CX allows most of the uses permitted in the Central Business Support (CB -5) zone: eating establishments, office uses, retail and service uses, and residential uses. This zone permits a variety of residential building types, including apartment buildings, townhouses, and mixed-use buildings. There are no restrictions on the residential density for this zone, however, there is limitations on maximum building height. The maximum building height is four stories, with an upper story setback of ten feet required along street frontages above the third story. There are opportunities for bonus height provisions up to an eight -story maximum. The attached development concept included in the applicant's statement of intent shows an 8 -story, 178 -dwelling unit building [Attachment 3]. The building concept would have 3 lower - levels for 259 residential parking spaces and 5 upper -levels for dwelling units. The concept also shows improvements along Ralston Creek and a pedestrian way that connects to S. Gilbert Street. The applicant will be requesting building height bonuses on the basis of Public Art, which allows one additional floor, and Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design, which allows up to four additional floors. A bonus height request of four stories would need to be reviewed by the staff Form -Based Code Design Review Committee prior to review and approval by the City Council. Projects zoned Riverfront Crossings and with residential uses are subject to the private Open Space Requirements of The Riverfront Crossings and Eastside Mixed Use Districts Form Based Development Standards. These require that open space shall be provided at a ratio of 10 square feet per bedroom. The proposed development will be conducted with this requirement and verified at Design Review. Since this proposed zoning would be within Riverfront Crossings if it is approved, all future development will be subject to the Affordable Housing Requirement. The development would be required to designate 10 or more percent of dwelling units as affordable housing units. Alternatively, a fee in lieu may satisfy the requirement and would be put into an affordable housing fund. Regulating Plan: The applicant has proposed a regulating plan amendment. Specifically, the request is to include approximately 0.5 acres, located at 625 South Gilbert Street, in the Central Crossing subdistrict. This area is currently identified on the regulating plan as within the Gilbert subdistrict. Figure 1 on the previous page displays the most notable standards of the two subdistricts. Existing Land Uses: The subject property is the former site of City Electric. The site also contains at least two residential uses, office uses, and some more intense commercial uses. Directly to the north, east, and west are multi -family residential buildings. The Iowa State Railroad runs to the 5 south of the subject lot. Rezoning Review Criteria: Staff uses the following two criteria in the review of rezonings: 1. Consistency with the comprehensive plan; and 2. Compatibility with the existing neighborhood character. Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan: The subject property is located in the Central Crossings and Gilbert Subdistricts of the Downtown and Riverfront Crossings Master Plan. The southern portion resides in the Gilbert Subdistrict and the larger, northern portion resides in the Central Crossings Subdistrict. The table below outlines the objectives and development character of the two subdistricts per the master plan. Figure 2. Central Crossings Gilbert Objectives: -Encourage contextual infill -Manage infill -Restore and enhance -Restore and enhance conditions along Ralston conditions along Ralston Creek Creek -Provide new housing options -Improve pedestrian and bicycle connectivity -Retrofit suburban development Development Character: -Integrate with South -District largely built out, no Downtown and Park major transformation north of subdistricts the railroad -Build on ongoing efforts to -Maintain smaller scale and improve quality residential lower intensity of use south of design the railroad. -Maintain moderate scale and intensity of use Due to the proximity of Ralston Creek, both subdistricts have objectives to restore and enhance the conditions along Ralston Creek. The Central Crossings District goes a step further and has a key goal to turn the creek into an asset that will stimulate development along its banks. This will encourage new residential development and also provide open spaces along the creek. Additionally, Central Crossings strives to maintain moderate scale and intensity of use as a development characteristic. The Gilbert Subdistrict differs from the Central Crossings Subdistrict in this aspect. One of the development character points of the Gilbert Subdistrict is to "maintain smaller -scale and lower intensity of use south of the railroad." The subject property, more notably the southern part of the subject property, falls on the northern side of the railroad where the envisioned intensity is not stated. In the Gilbert Subdistrict, the northern side of the railroad calls for no major transformations. By rezoning the subject property into a zone that allows residential uses, residential development will be encouraged along the creek. Therefore, staff is proposing a condition L1. to the rezoning to require improvements along Ralston Creek including removal of invasive species, stream bank stabilization, and tree planting subject to review by the City Forester. Compatibility with the Existing Neighborhood Character. - The development resulting from this rezoning would be compatible with the other multi- story buildings and new residential development surrounding the subject lot. The property on the west side of Ralston Creek, adjacent to the subject property, was rezoned to RFC -CX and the Form -Based Code Design Review Committee approved a 4 -story building, which is currently under construction. Across E. Prentiss Street and to the north of the subject property there is a five -story multi -use building. To the east of the subject property is a three-story apartment building. Massing studies submitted by the applicant [Attachment 31 conceptually show what the proposed 8 -story building will look like from the street -level view of all directions. Due to the lower elevation of the subject property the scale of the proposed building is similar to that of the surrounding properties. Traffic Implications and Access: The concept plan for the site shows access to the proposed building off of both E. Prentiss Street and S. Gilbert Street via existing curb cuts. An access agreement will need to be executed with the adjacent property ownerto utilize these access points. Although the access off of E. Prentiss St. appears to be an alley it is actually private property. Should an access agreement with the adjacent property owner not be achieved, alternative access to the site will need to be identified through the design review process. Additionally, staff is recommending a condition to obtain additional public right-of-way along S. Gilbert Street. The additional right-of-way will allow the City to reconfigure the sidewalk along S. Gilbert Street. Currently, the sidewalk is adjacent to the curb. Staff would like to push the sidewalk further west to provide an additional buffer between pedestrians and vehicular traffic. There are a couple of utility structures for which staff has requested access easements for any necessary future maintenance. One of these easements is necessary for access to a manhole for a trunk sewer located just inside the Ralston Creek right-of-way, near the southwest corner of the subject property. The other easement is needed for access to a sanitary sewer line that runs through the old Maiden Lane right-of-way, through the southeast portion of the subject property. Environmentally Sensitive Areas: Ralston Creek, to the western edge of the subject property, is an environmentally sensitive area. The City's Sensitive Areas Ordinance requires a 30 -foot buffer between development activity and the Ralston Creek floodway. Once a licensed engineer determines the floodway, a 30 -foot buffer will start at the edge of the floodway. A sensitive areas site plan will need to be submitted with the floodway and buffer delineated. Floodplain: The 100- and 500 -year floodplains of Ralston Creek, determined by FEMA, both encompass some of the subject property. Any development will need to comply with the City's floodplain management regulations. Floodproofing requirements and minimum floor elevations will be determined during site plan and building plan reviews. VA Storm Water Management: Staff anticipates that the existing stormwater infrastructure will be able to accommodate runoff from the proposed development. At the site plan stage staff will analyze whether the re -development of the site results in an increased amount of impervious surface. This is unlikely, since the current site is nearly all impervious. NEXT STEPS: Upon recommendation of approval from the Planning and Zoning Commission, a public hearing for the consideration of these applications will be scheduled with the City Council. Pending approval by the City Council, the applicant may submit plans for review by the Form - Based Code Design Review Committee. A request for a 4 -story height bonus would need to be reviewed by the Form -Based Code Design Review Committee, which would make a recommendation to the City Council for final review. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of ZCA19-03, an amendment to the Riverfront Crossings regulating plan to include the property located at 625 South Gilbert Street in the Central Crossing subdistrict. Staff recommends approval of REZ19-07, a proposal to rezone approximately 1.6 acres of property at 305 and 315 East Prentiss Street and 625 South Gilbert Street from Intensive Commercial (CI -1) and Community Commercial (CC -2) to Riverfront Crossings — Central Crossings (RFC -CX), subject to the following conditions: 1) Prior to issuance of a building permit, Owner shall dedicate right-of-way along the west side of S. Gilbert Street. The additional right-of-way needed is approximately 20' in width at the southern property line and 0' at the northern property line. 2) Provision of an access easement for City Wastewater Division vehicles and equipment to access the manhole for the trunk sewer located near the southwest corner of the subject property. 3) Provision of an access easement for City access to the sanitary sewer line that runs through the former Maiden Lane right-of-way through the southeast end of the subject property. 4) Improvement of Ralston Creek in accordance with the Form -Based Development Standards for Riverfront Crossings as follows: 1. Removal of invasive trees. 2. Stream bank stabilization including necessary grading and addition of rip -rap. 3. Planting of trees in accordance with a plan approved by a City forester. 4. Dedication of temporary construction easements for the reconstruction of the Prentiss Street Bridge. 5. The above work shall be done according to a plan prepared by the Owner and approved by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of a building permit. 5) Execute an affordable housing agreement to satisfy the affordable housing obligations imposed pursuant to Iowa City Code of Ordinances 14-2G-8 through the N. provision of on-site owner -occupied dwelling units, on-site rental dwelling units, and/or the payment of a fee in lieu of the remaining dwelling units not provided on- site or as otherwise agreed to between Owner and the City. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Location Map 2. Aerial Photograph 3. 315 E. Prentiss Street, Statement of Intent, Dated July 2, 2019 Approved by: Danielle Sitzman, AICP, Development Services Coordinator Department of Neighborhood and Development Services CITY OF IOWA CITY RFC SD RFC SD RFC -SD y Krc-,�u i, RM44 RM44 RM44 RM44 RM44 KIvi i KIVJIZ W gF -SD t �" RM44 I RM12 RFC -SD RM44 RM44 RM44 �i RFC -SD , -RFC-SD RFC -SD RM44 i. RM44 P1 R P2 RFC SD RFC -SD RFC -SD RM44 _ e ! RNS12 RFC SD RFO-SD RM44 RM44 RM12 RM12 P2 ,RFC -SD ° rr RFC SD... FC -S. FtFC SD CC2 RM44 RM44 RM44 r RM44 RM12 RM12 RNS42 RFC- D RFC SD' RM44 RM' U RM44 RM44 �, RM44 RM12 RM12 E HARRISON ST RFC-SD`.E HARRISON ST RM44 Z t, '' RM12 R w RM44 RM44 RM44 PRM . _ RFC- RM44 � RM12 RM12 D2 PRM PRM P � RM44 m RM44 RM44 RM44 RM12 -RNS12 yF RM RFC SD PRM Z aS RM44 Q RM44 RM44 RM44 RM12 U)i RRM12 0 PRMPRM PRM PRM PIM Z RM44 > RM44 RM12 w PRM PRM RFC -SD �k, R RFC -SD'° R RFC -SD PRM PR FC -SDS RFC -SD RM44 RM44 RM44 RM12 p RM12 RFC -Sb, RFC -SQ- RM44 RM - P2 'PRM P2 t'� PRM RFC -SD PRM RM44 RM 4; O RM12 PRM PRM RFC -SD PR' RFC-S� RFC_S11 RM44 a RM44 O RM44 RM12 ry - RNS12 PRM PRM RFC..SD W RM12 PRM RFC -SD RFCFC-SD RM44 RM z :RM44 RM12 RM12RNS12 -- RFC -CX, 'E PRENTISS ST PRM FC -SD 'RFC -SD CC2 RM44 RM44 RM O RM44 RM12 RM12, RM12 r� r�°friiir P __ R RM44 RM44 R R1M1 RM12 RM,12 b PRM :. PRM w C2 RM44 M44 RM44 BOWERY ST M44 CC ,• 'PRM � RFC-; 2 - - = — = — = — — --�tM�4� .r.: RNS12 PRM PRM RM PRM O RFC -CX _ PRM F PRM CO m FC -CX RM RM44 RM44 RM44 RM44 RM44 44 RM44 P2 O PRM PR Z p C11 RM44 RM44 RM44 RM44 RM4 RM44 RM44 RNS12 RM CC2 C p RM44 FC -CX / 44 RM44 RM44 RM44 RM44 RM44 v PRM PRMz RFC CX;, RM44 RM44 RM44 RM44 RNS12 FC CX�y_ w� C2 RM44 RM44 RM44 RM44 RM44 RM44 RM44 c;'ryyll - va _ RM44 RM44 RM44 RM12 _ * 17:7RM44 C11 RFC -CX 'A �_ RM44 RM44 RM12 �C11 - C62 �, ` +w RM44 RM44 C11 RFC -CX F, P1�M 1x�— RM44 RM12 RFC -CX CI1 RM44 RM44 RM44 C11 P2 "i CC2 RM44 RM44 RM44 RM12 I P1 C11 < d CI1" C11 C11 CC2 " `` 4 RM44 RM12 P2 CC2 �� R C11 s RM44 RM44 RM12 CI1 CC2 ` `® M44 RM44 RM12 C11 # CI1 CC2 `� RS8 e RM44 RM12 P1 xi:. P2 I�av�..": RS8 RS8y RM12 LAFAYETTE ST 7 P1 {j RS8 .,. RS8 m ' RS8 RS8 RS8 cn RS8 RS8 —G--- � � y RS8 RS8 z P1 P1 RS12 An application submitted by Davis Maxwell, Capstone Collegiate Z � W RS8 RSE� RS12 RS12 Communities LLC for the rezoning of approximately 1.6 acres at 91 o RS8 m °Rss RS8 RS8 Rss W RS12 RS12 VI 305 & 315 E Prentiss St & 635 S Gilbert Street from Communityi RS8 ?' Z *- Tee � PAGE ST 1, RS8 RS8 m8 - _ `'RS8 A RS8 RS8 RS8 Commercial (CC -2) and Intensive Commercial (CI -1) to Riverfront cllRss „RSA ? RS8 x, U) _� RS8 RS8 RS8 RS8 T7.1 tit" RS8 RS8 RS8 RS8 »- RSE Crossings - Central Crossings Subdistrict (RFC -CX). _ Rs8 Rss _ -' = RS8 RS8 $ R ��RS8 8 " RS8 RS8 'a RS8 RS8 RS8 ri1 r `. - C11 RSR �: RS8 Rosi sfiR RS8 # RS8 RCR R¢R RS8 RS8 e LU -IARRISON ST a - q +, f 'I ° •4 �� a � �z � '' J� � i { E PRENTISS ST P n �: l fid` ��• :d Ca LU Q WRIGHT r b U • Y��Y_ Jl ' w J c] 07 - �+ U) - 'U) IJ - V erre:. 1 • / P C Lit w ` LAFAYET TE ST An application submitted by Davis Maxwell, Capstone Collegiate Communities LLC for the rezoning of approximately 1.6 acres at 305 & 315 E Prentiss St & 635 S Gilbert Street from Community Commercial (CC -2) and Intensive Commercial (CI -1) to Riverfront Crossings - Central Crossings Subdistrict (RFC -CX). CITY OF IOWA CITY r � E .� ftL.-34 i Ate^• i ;J4 1 - r J z t W I VeW 0 a � m Q Z e �Vi R" s CITY OF IOWA CITY r � E .� ftL.-34 i Ate^• i ;J4 1 - r DEVELOPER: SUBMITTED TO: Planning Staff JULY 2, 2019 315 East Prentiss Street INTRODUCTION On behalf of Capstone Collegiate Communities and their Project Team, I am pleased to present to you our vision for the re -development of the properties located at 305 & 315 E. Prentiss and 625 S. Gilbert Street in Iowa City. Commonly referred to as 315 E Prentiss, the project promises to be a vibrant addition to Iowa City and the River Front Crossings District. The project will deliver high-quality, residential housing to a property that is on the east bank of Ralston Creek and currently used for an industrial use . The new residential tenants will be located close to public transportation, surrounded by highly regarded, locally owned dining establishments, and within a 10 - minute walk of downtown. All parking for the project will be located within the building footprint and the 4th level of the building will feature roof -top terraces, a clubroom, and fitness center for the private use of the building occupants. At street level, the banks of Ralston Creek will be stabilized and the floodplain buffer will be enhanced to create publicly accessible open space. Further, a pedestrian walkway will be added along the south side of the property to provide an opportunity for pedestrians on S. Gilbert Street to access Ralston Creek and enjoy the enhancements located along the banks. The Project Team and I look forward to working with the City of Iowa City to create a successful project for the developer and the city. MICHAEL WELCH Project Lead The project team consists of: OWNER / DEVELOPER: CAPSTONE COLLEGIATE COMMUNITIES, LLC OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE AXIOM CONSULTANTS, LLC NILES BOLTON ASSOCIATES CIVIL, STRUCTURAL, AND MEP ENGINEER: AXIOM CONSULTANTS, LLC W_101I9LY•1_1»_1: ]ImI19:101 LMO PARTNERS Project PROCESS THREE DISTINCT PHASES I i PHASE 1 Rezoning/Height Bonus May 2019 The rezoning phase of the project began in May of 2019 with the submission of a rezoning application. A change to the Regulating Plan will be sought concurrently with rezoning the property to River Front Crossings—Central Crossings District. A Level II Design Review will be required to achieve the desired eight -floors. The Project Team will commence work on the Design Review submissions once it is clear that P&Z and Council are supportive of rezoning. 9 MONTHS PHASE 2 Design Winter 2019– Spring 2020 A significant portion of the design process will occur during the Design Review process. This effort will continue upon the completion of the Design Review process and include geotechnical investigation and Phase II ESA. These efforts will culminate in an approved Site Plan and Building Plans early Spring of 2020 to allow construction to begin in 2020. The Project Team will work closely with city staff throughout the process to streamline the design to the extent possible. 18 MONTHS D u PHASE 3 Construction Summer 2020—Summer 2022 Construction is expected to begin in Summer 2020 upon the approval of a building and site design. The building is expected to take approximately 15-17 months, including Ralston Creek stabilization and right-of-way improvements. The building should be ready for an August 2022 occupancy. Section SITE NARRATIVE Master Plan COMPARISION FOOTPRINTS OF THE DEVELOPMENT AS COMPARED TO THE MASTER PLAN (PAGE 66) — _ I- IT17,Uq F a F.� V'3 1 4 agOP■ a UJ ' -._ - Ucc _ wrzx • IL # f W USW r # # - _ .# ■ a Ir" a 04 0 - �76 If 41D tt Plan diagram of the Central Sub -District from the Downtown and Riverfront Plan diagram of the Central Crossings Sub -District from the Downtown and Crossings Masterplan document with the 315 East Prentiss site outlined in red. Riverfront Crossings Masterplan document with the 315 East Prentiss site out - Note that in the Masterplan, the site lies within two sub -districts: Central Cross- lined in red and the proposed building footprint diagram overlaid. The Central ings and Gilbert Districts. Crossings Boundary has been adjusted to reflect the proposed changes to the Regulating Plan. Project FOOTPRINT A GENERAL OVERVIEW OF WHAT COMPRISES THIS EFFORT RESTORED RIPARIAN PRENTI55 ST VEGETATION (PROPOSED) " { V PROPERTY LINE r. a_ RETAIN GRADES WITH NATURAL MATERIALS FLOODWAY I ~ (FROM CITY MAPPING), �I « 30' FLOODWAY BUFFER 41 STAIR t 5' FLOODWAY BUFFER SETBACK 1 TERRACE B - I I 1 (LEVEL4) PUBLIC WALKWAY (AT GRADE) I STAIR • 1 i (PLAZA (AT GRADE) TERRA CEC (LEVEL -4) 771 I ;s O STAIR IOWA INTERSTATE RAILROAD CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY: PARCEL "A" AREA: +/- 1.60 ACRES APARTMENTS: 178 UNITS 1 400 BEDS 780 NSF/UNIT AVG 1 347 NSF/BED AVG 138,850 NRSF TOTAL LOBBY, LEASING E MAIL: 2,918 SF CLUBROOM & FITNESS: 5,514 SF —r i r,{ e RMB 55 - \ PARKING: 259 SPACES PROVIDED (249 REQ) —FK=V PLAZA I k PARKING RATIO: 1.45 SPACES/UNIT 1 0.65 SPACES/BED - LOBBY, LEASING Et MAIL \_ (GROUND LEVEL) BOWERY ST CLUB ROOM Et FITNESS_- (TERRACE LEVEL 4) r? MAIN FARWIING ACCESS FROM EASEMENT 8 STORY BU1,;LDING ti (5 RESIDENTIAL LEVELS OVER 3 PARKING LEVELS) SECONDARY PARKING w ACCESS FROM EASEMENT -` r The project will be comprised of a single eight (8) story building and a variety of improvements to Ralston Creek. The building consists of three floors of parking with five floors of residential, including a club room, fitness room, and 4th level terraces. Ralston Creek improvements cover creek stabilization and removal of invasive species as well as the construction of a pedestrian greenway along the east side of the creek. The space will be designed to encourage public use and pedestrian access to this under-utilized natural resource which flows through River Front Crossings Ralston Creek IMPROVEMENTS SAMPLE OF POTENTIAL CREEK ENHANCEMENTS /— A � orrag..�r t f pP'�u1DE Pa.HIr BVL x%/84,6 .4�/ W' + �se�rrt�O�I. a�:e l2.r wi�eh `Wn4v�c."'G ��e44r'^�t i7c`'rr�5 pssarv�e P°�f� ' _�tl 1, 11� 0 �.i.5 "L"¢7T'`�.�Y ��"I,I�'1 Cw �pl$vE �'G-✓ �eei5 $�f�• �TFyw,7.� ° R—A.+rSfonl c.rtr�.� j �rY,� ��`�A/e..,�ZRYor,.' k(TE"IY,rJ -r �+a..i%.�G�F� -. ,'hwovd F1.K�Ic #M`fs T pr.(aw sr} To r.b WI �`E�'rnr( - P4pnF4AJJ J rrf_ r '!; 4ww' wurrcW 7 w Z �N.rs,( t r .r.rp +e �u� euf-sf-s� 5rdd�r ►iq..e�r. 2 P4.wc . 4l+tga - pa ndss p� �FY Aa.#r:.� v.`eedi-. i �IAyLS T k�r� `s�erus+•Yall f�q'c'"+� •fir+.af. TYPICAL SECTION of PROPOSED RALSON CREEK IMPROVEMENTS REDISCOVERING A NATURAL FEATURE The restoration of the Ralston Creek corridor would include a multi -step design approach to restoring and improving portions of the creek to create an inviting amenity that will enhance the quality of life for the citizens of Iowa City. The first suggested step would be to remove the existing concrete structures and re -shape the creek channel and bank to mimic a more natural pattern. Stabilizing the banks with a combination of rock boulders or outcroppings and native plantings suitable for the riparian zone of the lower banks. Secondly, swales and pools running parallel to the creeks banks would be incorporated to reduce the floodwater velocity from upstream channelization. These features combined with the riparian plantings also provide an opportunity to capture stormwater from the adjacent sites and filter contaminants. Finally, engaging the public with the creek by connecting pathways and plazas through public open spaces along the creek can bring awareness that not only the creek exists, but can be made into an attractive natural amenity. Ultimately, restoring this portion of the creek could be used as a model for future developments along the creek corridor. Section SCALE Scale of BUILDINGS SIMILAR BUILDING SCALE COMPARISON MATRIX 620 Dubuque 736 FT Dubuque St NARRATIVE: The Rise 831 FT 315 5 Prentiss 225 Prentiss 742 FT 710 FT r =_ l l Ralston Creek 601 5 Gilbert 713 FT I S Gilbert St The Mansion 538 S Gilbert 729 FT Section diagram illustrating the elevational height of the tallest buildings in the South Downtown and Central Crossings dis- tricts visible along Prentiss, from Gilbert to Dubuque 315 E Prentiss will be located near the bottom of the Prentiss Street hill nestled along Ralston Creek in the valley between Gilbert Street and Dubuque Street. The natural rise in the topography surrounding the project site allows for the proposed 8—stories to meld into the neighborhood. The structure will compliment rather than dominate the surrounding buildings This exhibit shows a number of buildings and how they compare to the proposed construction of the 315 E Prentiss Project. The view of this exhibit is looking direction north with a west -to -east cut through the center of the property. 315 E Prentiss 602 S Dubuque 620 S Dubuque 225 E Prentiss Court & Linn PROJECT CAPSTONE DUBUQUE STREET DUBUQUE STREET DUBUQUE PH IV THE RISE YEAR 2022 (proposed) 2017 2018 2019 2018 STORIES ABOVE 8 (proposed) 4 4 4 15 GRADE APPROXIMATE 742 FT 724 FT 736 FT 710 FT 831 FT HEIGHT 315 E Prentiss will be located near the bottom of the Prentiss Street hill nestled along Ralston Creek in the valley between Gilbert Street and Dubuque Street. The natural rise in the topography surrounding the project site allows for the proposed 8—stories to meld into the neighborhood. The structure will compliment rather than dominate the surrounding buildings This exhibit shows a number of buildings and how they compare to the proposed construction of the 315 E Prentiss Project. The view of this exhibit is looking direction north with a west -to -east cut through the center of the property. Project MASSING CONCEPTUAL STREET -LEVEL VIEW OF SITE PLACEMENT Rendered street -level view looking Southeast from the intersection of Dubuque and Prentiss. Conceptual view showing the project located behind the Dubuque Phase IV—Pacha building at 225 E. Prentiss Street) (currently under construction) building at the center of the image (in gray). The Dubuque Phase I can be seen at the right of the image. NEIGHBORHOOD POINT -of -REFERENCE DIAGRAM. Northeast Corner of Dubuque Street and Prentiss Street Project MASSING CONCEPTUAL STREET -LEVEL VIEW OF SITE PLACEMENT Rendered street -level view looking North from the South Gilbert. Conceptual view showing the project located behind the Iowa Interstate Railroad. World of Bikes is located to the left of the image and Kennedy Plaza is right of the image. t - z NEIGHBORHOOD POINT -of -REFERENCE DIAGRAM: Intersection of South Gilbert and Maiden Lane Project MASSING CONCEPTUAL STREET -LEVEL VIEW OF SITE PLACEMENT Rendered street -level looking South from The Rise on Linn Street. Conceptual view showing the project located behind various apartments along Court Street. Proposed building just visible through tree line at right -center of image. NEIGHBORHOOD POINT -OF -REFERENCE DIAGRAM: The Rise Courtyard along Linn Street Project MASSING CONCEPTUAL STREET -LEVEL VIEW OF SITE PLACEMENT Rendered street -level looking west from the intersection of Prentiss and Gilbert Conceptual view showing the project located behind 601 S Gilbert St. Although the proposed building is substantially larger than the existing building located at 601 S Gilbert Street, the site topography reduces the overall impression of the mass of the building. NEIGHBORHOOD POINT -of -REFERENCE DIAGRAM: The intersection of Prentiss and Gilbert Section HEIGHT BONUS Height BONUS JUSTIFICATION FOR REQUEST REQUEST PER CODE: Per the City of Iowa City Riverfront Crossings District General Requirements, Article G, 14-2G-7, Section G: BUILDING HEIGHT PROVISIONS our team is requesting consideration for: The granting of additional bonus height in the amount of four (4) stories for the proposed building to be constructed at 315 East Prentiss Street. This would allow for construction of one 8 -story structure on the site which is the maximum allowed under the RIVER FRONT CROSSING: CENTRAL CROSSINGS SUB -DISTRICT. The code provides for a number of incentives for developments to incorporate features that provide both public benefits as well as important goals towards furthering the objectives of the overall downtown and Riverfront Crossings Master Plan. This project is eligible in a number of areas and we are specifically requesting to utilize two (2) different means in our overall request. Both of these areas is detailed in the subsequent sections to identify how we aim to achieve the associated goals. PUBLIC ART (14 -2G -7-G-6) HEIGHT BONUS FOR LEADERSHIP IN ENERGY EFFICIENCYAND ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN (14 -2G -7-G-7) Level II design review will be required for this project. As a result, the requested Height Bonus will be put before both the City's Design Review Committee and the City Council. Public Art 14 -2G -7-G-6 NARRATIVE of ELIGIBILITY. Per item 14 -2G -7-G-6 of the Iowa City code, one additional floor of building height may be granted for a contribution to the City's public art program equal to one percent (1 %) of threshold value of the project. Threshold value is the sum of all construction costs shown on all building permits associated with the project, including site preparation. Funds contributed shall be used by the City for public art within the Riverfront Crossings District as approved by the Public Art Committee. JUSTIFICATION of REQUIREMENTS: The Project Team believes that the project will improve the aesthetics and pedestrian experience along E. Prentiss Street. The creation of publicly accessible open space between the proposed building and the banks of Ralston Creek may lend itself to creating a location for public art. The team is looking forward to working with the members of the city's public art program to evaluate the opportunities to make the public art more than a check written to the city. Placing public art within the public space may add one more amenity and incentive to attract additional pedestrian traffic to the banks of Ralston Creek. REQUESTING: 1 floor Height Bonus for Energy Efficiency and Environmental Stewardship 14.2G -7-G-7 NARRATIVE of ELIGIBILITY: Per item 14 -2G -7-G-8 of the Iowa City code, up to four (4) additional floors of building height may be granted for projects that are designed to meet high standards with regard to energy efficiency and environmental stewardship, according to LEED or other similar environmental or energy efficiency rating system. In general, the higher the level of energy efficiency or environmental stewardship demonstrated, the greater the bonus. The amount of bonus granted will be based on the overall quality of the project. Bonus height may also be granted for projects that are designed to minimize the impact of stormwater runoff on the environment through the use of bioswales, rain gardens, green roofs, rainwater harvesting, and stream bank stabilization and restoration along Ralston Creek or the Iowa River, as described in the riverfront crossings district subarea plan adopted in April 2011. A long term maintenance plan must accompany any proposal for such green features. JUSTIFICATION of REQUIREMENTS: The Project Team believes that this property is uniquely situated to create a catalyst for the development of a pedestrian friendly and inviting place along Ralston Creek. The enhancements to Ralston Creek, the areas within the city right-of-way along Ralston Creek, and the floodway buffers associated with the waterway could serve as a greenway between Riverfront Crossings Park located at the south end of the District and E. Prentiss Street. The measures implemented on this Project could well be the template and standard for the numerous properties and projects located along Ralston Creek within Riverfront Crossings The Project Team is suggesting that the project go beyond the minimal measures required by adjacent CZAs (removal of invasive species and stream bank stabilization) and a fuller, bigger picture plan be implemented. Thsi plan could included pedestrian access directly to the waterway for canoe/kayak launch, stabilization with native vegetation or other measures that would ultimately result in a more sustainable and natural waterway, incorporation of a pedestrian access under the Iowa Interstate Railroad Bridge for future trail extension, inclusion of public education signage or components, and many other options. The project team truly believes that Ralston Creek is an amenity that has been overlooked and ignored for too long and welcome the opportunity to work with city staff and City Council to develop the right mix of amenities and improvements to the waterway and adjacent land. The building design will incorporate many features that are in accordance with the LEED certification system; however, consistent with City requirements, the Project Team will not seek LEED certification. REQUESTING: 3 floors requested (4 allowed) Height BONUS SYNOPSIS OF THE REQUEST NARRATIVE of ELIGIBILITY: The City of Iowa City code allows for ten (10) different methods for a developer to request additional height for a project. We are planning to make requests within two of these categories at the current time. # NAME 1 Public Art 2 LEED SECTION I ALLOWED REQUESTED JUSTIFICATION 14 -2G -7-G-6 1 1 1% of threshold value contribution 14 -2G -7-G-7 4 2 LEED Pursuant and Ralston Creek REQUEST NARRATIVE: Our team will be requesting the additional height for this project in order to maximize the site to its full potential. The project is consistent with the Master Plan and will create a strong anchor for the north end of Ralston Creek rehabilitation south of Downtown. REQUEST NUMBERS: 4 total floors requested FLOORS ALLOWED IN BASE ZONE = 4 FLOORS REQUESTED BY BONUS HEIGHT = 4 TOTAL FLOORS PROPOSED ACROSS THE SITE = 8 Item Number: 7.b. +r p- W�rm�M CITY O� IOWA CITY www.icgov.org September 17, 2019 Motion setting a public hearing for October 1, 2019 on an ordinance conditionally rezoning approximately 1.6 acres of property located at 305 and 315 E. Prentiss Street and 625 S. Gilbert Street from Community Commercial (CC -2) and Intensive Commercial (CI -1) to Riverfront Crossings - Central Crossings (RFC -CX). (REZ19-07). ATTACHMENTS: Description PZ Staff Report w Attachments To: Planning and Zoning Commission Item: REZ19-07 / ZCA19-03 E Prentiss & S Gilbert GENERAL INFORMATION: Applicant: Property Owner: Requested Action: Purpose: Location: Location Map: Boni C ®L9�hl' �C•C`T - �; w 19T F. j/ STAFF REPORT Prepared by: Jade Pederson, Planning Intern and Anne Russett, Senior Planner Date: August 15, 2019 Davis Maxwell Capstone Collegiate Communities, LLC 431 Office Park Drive Birmingham, AL 35223 dmaxwell@capstonemail.com 205-414-6438 Boyd Investments 625 S Gilbert Street Iowa City, IA 52240 319-321-5152 Regulating plan amendment from Gilbert Subdistrict to Central Crossings Subdistrict Rezoning from Intensive Commercial (CI -1) and Community Commercial (CC -2) to Riverfront Crossings — Central Crossings (RFC -CX). Redevelopment of the site per the Riverfront Crossing's form -based code 305 & 315 E Prentiss St. & 625 S Gilbert St. Iowa City, IA Size: Existing Land Use and Zoning Surrounding Land Use and Zoning Comprehensive Plan: Neighborhood Open Space District Public Meeting Notification: File Date: 45 Day Limitation Period: BACKGROUND INFORMATION: K 1.6 Acres Two office buildings zoned Intensive Commercial (CI -1) and one apartment zoned Community Commercial (CC -2) North: RFC -SD — Riverfront Crossings -South District (Office and Commercial) PRM — Planned High Density Multi - Family Residential (Condominiums) South: CC -2 — Community Commercial (Mixed - Use and Commercial) CI -1 — Intensive Commercial (Office) East: RM -44 — High Density Multi -Family Residential (Residential) CC -2 — Community Commercial (Commercial) West: RFC -CX — Riverfront Crossings -Central Crossings (Multi -family residential) Downtown and Riverfront Crossings Master Plan C7 Property owners located within 300 feet of the project site received notification of the Planning and Zoning Commission public meeting. August 1, 2019 September 16, 2019 The applicant, Davis Maxwell representing Capstone Collegiate Communities, LLC, has requested the following: 1. An amendment to the Riverfront Crossings regulating plan (14-2G-2): The project site is located within the Central Crossings and Gilbert Subdistricts of the Riverfront Crossings District. The properties located at 305 and 315 East Prentiss are within the Central Crossings Subdistrict while the 625 South Gilbert Street property is within the Gilbert Subdistrict. The applicant has requested that the regulating plan be amended to include the 625 South Gilbert Street property in the Central Crossings subdistrict. 2. A rezoning from Intensive Commercial (CI -1) and Community Commercial (CC -2) to Riverfront Crossings — Central Crossings (RFC -CX) for 1.6 acres at 305 and 315 East Prentiss Street and 625 South Gilbert Street. 3 At the time this staff report was published the applicant had not held a good neighbor meeting. ANALYSIS: Current Zoning: Zone District. - The property at 305 East Prentiss Street is currently zoned Community Commercial (CC -2). The additional two properties, at 315 East Prentiss Street and 625 South Gilbert Street, are currently zoned Intensive Commercial (CI -1). The purpose of the Community Commercial (CC -2) zone is to provide services, that are in a major business district, to a significant portion of community. The primary uses of the CC -2 zone are for commercial, retail, and office. The Intensive Commercial Zone (CI -1) zone is intended "to provide areas for those sales and service functions whose operations are typically characterized by outdoor display and storage of merchandise, repair and sales of large equipment or motor vehicles, outdoor commercial amusement and recreation activities, or by operations conducted in buildings or structures that are not completely enclosed." Residential uses are not an allowed use in the CI -1 zone. Regulating Plan: The project property falls into two different subdistricts of the Riverfront Crossings District. The lot located at 625 South Gilbert Street is in the Gilbert Subdistrict and the lots located at 305 and 315 East Prentiss Street are in the Central Crossings Subdistrict. While the two subdistricts do still fall within the same general guidelines of the Downtown & Riverfront Crossings Master Plan, they both have distinctive objectives, regulations, and standards that they follow. The most notable differences and similarities between the subdistricts include standards pertaining to land uses, base max height, and max bonus height. Figure 1 shows some of the standards of the Central Crossings and Gilbert Subdistricts. Figure 1. Central Crossings Subdistrict Gilbert Subdistrict Land Uses Same as CB -5 zone: Same as C13-5 zone: -Provisional residential use -Provisional residential use -Most commercial use -Most commercial use -Provisional industrial use -Provisional industrial use -Most institutional and civic uses -Most institutional and civic uses Base Height Maximum 4 floors 3 floors Bonus Height 8 floors 5 floors Maximum ri Proposed Zoning: Zone District.• The proposed Riverfront Crossings — Central Crossings Subdistrict (RFC -CX) zone is "intended for moderate intensity mixed use development in buildings with entries opening onto pedestrian friendly streets and sidewalks." Other properties that surround the subject property and have the RFC -CX zone are to the west. RFC -CX allows most of the uses permitted in the Central Business Support (CB -5) zone: eating establishments, office uses, retail and service uses, and residential uses. This zone permits a variety of residential building types, including apartment buildings, townhouses, and mixed-use buildings. There are no restrictions on the residential density for this zone, however, there is limitations on maximum building height. The maximum building height is four stories, with an upper story setback of ten feet required along street frontages above the third story. There are opportunities for bonus height provisions up to an eight -story maximum. The attached development concept included in the applicant's statement of intent shows an 8 -story, 178 -dwelling unit building [Attachment 3]. The building concept would have 3 lower - levels for 259 residential parking spaces and 5 upper -levels for dwelling units. The concept also shows improvements along Ralston Creek and a pedestrian way that connects to S. Gilbert Street. The applicant will be requesting building height bonuses on the basis of Public Art, which allows one additional floor, and Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design, which allows up to four additional floors. A bonus height request of four stories would need to be reviewed by the staff Form -Based Code Design Review Committee prior to review and approval by the City Council. Projects zoned Riverfront Crossings and with residential uses are subject to the private Open Space Requirements of The Riverfront Crossings and Eastside Mixed Use Districts Form Based Development Standards. These require that open space shall be provided at a ratio of 10 square feet per bedroom. The proposed development will be conducted with this requirement and verified at Design Review. Since this proposed zoning would be within Riverfront Crossings if it is approved, all future development will be subject to the Affordable Housing Requirement. The development would be required to designate 10 or more percent of dwelling units as affordable housing units. Alternatively, a fee in lieu may satisfy the requirement and would be put into an affordable housing fund. Regulating Plan: The applicant has proposed a regulating plan amendment. Specifically, the request is to include approximately 0.5 acres, located at 625 South Gilbert Street, in the Central Crossing subdistrict. This area is currently identified on the regulating plan as within the Gilbert subdistrict. Figure 1 on the previous page displays the most notable standards of the two subdistricts. Existing Land Uses: The subject property is the former site of City Electric. The site also contains at least two residential uses, office uses, and some more intense commercial uses. Directly to the north, east, and west are multi -family residential buildings. The Iowa State Railroad runs to the 5 south of the subject lot. Rezoning Review Criteria: Staff uses the following two criteria in the review of rezonings: 1. Consistency with the comprehensive plan; and 2. Compatibility with the existing neighborhood character. Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan: The subject property is located in the Central Crossings and Gilbert Subdistricts of the Downtown and Riverfront Crossings Master Plan. The southern portion resides in the Gilbert Subdistrict and the larger, northern portion resides in the Central Crossings Subdistrict. The table below outlines the objectives and development character of the two subdistricts per the master plan. Figure 2. Central Crossings Gilbert Objectives: -Encourage contextual infill -Manage infill -Restore and enhance -Restore and enhance conditions along Ralston conditions along Ralston Creek Creek -Provide new housing options -Improve pedestrian and bicycle connectivity -Retrofit suburban development Development Character: -Integrate with South -District largely built out, no Downtown and Park major transformation north of subdistricts the railroad -Build on ongoing efforts to -Maintain smaller scale and improve quality residential lower intensity of use south of design the railroad. -Maintain moderate scale and intensity of use Due to the proximity of Ralston Creek, both subdistricts have objectives to restore and enhance the conditions along Ralston Creek. The Central Crossings District goes a step further and has a key goal to turn the creek into an asset that will stimulate development along its banks. This will encourage new residential development and also provide open spaces along the creek. Additionally, Central Crossings strives to maintain moderate scale and intensity of use as a development characteristic. The Gilbert Subdistrict differs from the Central Crossings Subdistrict in this aspect. One of the development character points of the Gilbert Subdistrict is to "maintain smaller -scale and lower intensity of use south of the railroad." The subject property, more notably the southern part of the subject property, falls on the northern side of the railroad where the envisioned intensity is not stated. In the Gilbert Subdistrict, the northern side of the railroad calls for no major transformations. By rezoning the subject property into a zone that allows residential uses, residential development will be encouraged along the creek. Therefore, staff is proposing a condition L1. to the rezoning to require improvements along Ralston Creek including removal of invasive species, stream bank stabilization, and tree planting subject to review by the City Forester. Compatibility with the Existing Neighborhood Character. - The development resulting from this rezoning would be compatible with the other multi- story buildings and new residential development surrounding the subject lot. The property on the west side of Ralston Creek, adjacent to the subject property, was rezoned to RFC -CX and the Form -Based Code Design Review Committee approved a 4 -story building, which is currently under construction. Across E. Prentiss Street and to the north of the subject property there is a five -story multi -use building. To the east of the subject property is a three-story apartment building. Massing studies submitted by the applicant [Attachment 31 conceptually show what the proposed 8 -story building will look like from the street -level view of all directions. Due to the lower elevation of the subject property the scale of the proposed building is similar to that of the surrounding properties. Traffic Implications and Access: The concept plan for the site shows access to the proposed building off of both E. Prentiss Street and S. Gilbert Street via existing curb cuts. An access agreement will need to be executed with the adjacent property ownerto utilize these access points. Although the access off of E. Prentiss St. appears to be an alley it is actually private property. Should an access agreement with the adjacent property owner not be achieved, alternative access to the site will need to be identified through the design review process. Additionally, staff is recommending a condition to obtain additional public right-of-way along S. Gilbert Street. The additional right-of-way will allow the City to reconfigure the sidewalk along S. Gilbert Street. Currently, the sidewalk is adjacent to the curb. Staff would like to push the sidewalk further west to provide an additional buffer between pedestrians and vehicular traffic. There are a couple of utility structures for which staff has requested access easements for any necessary future maintenance. One of these easements is necessary for access to a manhole for a trunk sewer located just inside the Ralston Creek right-of-way, near the southwest corner of the subject property. The other easement is needed for access to a sanitary sewer line that runs through the old Maiden Lane right-of-way, through the southeast portion of the subject property. Environmentally Sensitive Areas: Ralston Creek, to the western edge of the subject property, is an environmentally sensitive area. The City's Sensitive Areas Ordinance requires a 30 -foot buffer between development activity and the Ralston Creek floodway. Once a licensed engineer determines the floodway, a 30 -foot buffer will start at the edge of the floodway. A sensitive areas site plan will need to be submitted with the floodway and buffer delineated. Floodplain: The 100- and 500 -year floodplains of Ralston Creek, determined by FEMA, both encompass some of the subject property. Any development will need to comply with the City's floodplain management regulations. Floodproofing requirements and minimum floor elevations will be determined during site plan and building plan reviews. VA Storm Water Management: Staff anticipates that the existing stormwater infrastructure will be able to accommodate runoff from the proposed development. At the site plan stage staff will analyze whether the re -development of the site results in an increased amount of impervious surface. This is unlikely, since the current site is nearly all impervious. NEXT STEPS: Upon recommendation of approval from the Planning and Zoning Commission, a public hearing for the consideration of these applications will be scheduled with the City Council. Pending approval by the City Council, the applicant may submit plans for review by the Form - Based Code Design Review Committee. A request for a 4 -story height bonus would need to be reviewed by the Form -Based Code Design Review Committee, which would make a recommendation to the City Council for final review. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of ZCA19-03, an amendment to the Riverfront Crossings regulating plan to include the property located at 625 South Gilbert Street in the Central Crossing subdistrict. Staff recommends approval of REZ19-07, a proposal to rezone approximately 1.6 acres of property at 305 and 315 East Prentiss Street and 625 South Gilbert Street from Intensive Commercial (CI -1) and Community Commercial (CC -2) to Riverfront Crossings — Central Crossings (RFC -CX), subject to the following conditions: 1) Prior to issuance of a building permit, Owner shall dedicate right-of-way along the west side of S. Gilbert Street. The additional right-of-way needed is approximately 20' in width at the southern property line and 0' at the northern property line. 2) Provision of an access easement for City Wastewater Division vehicles and equipment to access the manhole for the trunk sewer located near the southwest corner of the subject property. 3) Provision of an access easement for City access to the sanitary sewer line that runs through the former Maiden Lane right-of-way through the southeast end of the subject property. 4) Improvement of Ralston Creek in accordance with the Form -Based Development Standards for Riverfront Crossings as follows: 1. Removal of invasive trees. 2. Stream bank stabilization including necessary grading and addition of rip -rap. 3. Planting of trees in accordance with a plan approved by a City forester. 4. Dedication of temporary construction easements for the reconstruction of the Prentiss Street Bridge. 5. The above work shall be done according to a plan prepared by the Owner and approved by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of a building permit. 5) Execute an affordable housing agreement to satisfy the affordable housing obligations imposed pursuant to Iowa City Code of Ordinances 14-2G-8 through the N. provision of on-site owner -occupied dwelling units, on-site rental dwelling units, and/or the payment of a fee in lieu of the remaining dwelling units not provided on- site or as otherwise agreed to between Owner and the City. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Location Map 2. Aerial Photograph 3. 315 E. Prentiss Street, Statement of Intent, Dated July 2, 2019 Approved by: Danielle Sitzman, AICP, Development Services Coordinator Department of Neighborhood and Development Services CITY OF IOWA CITY RFC SD RFC SD RFC -SD y Krc-,�u i, RM44 RM44 RM44 RM44 RM44 KIvi i KIVJIZ W gF -SD t �" RM44 I RM12 RFC -SD RM44 RM44 RM44 �i RFC -SD , -RFC-SD RFC -SD RM44 i. RM44 P1 R P2 RFC SD RFC -SD RFC -SD RM44 _ e ! RNS12 RFC SD RFO-SD RM44 RM44 RM12 RM12 P2 ,RFC -SD ° rr RFC SD... FC -S. FtFC SD CC2 RM44 RM44 RM44 r RM44 RM12 RM12 RNS42 RFC- D RFC SD' RM44 RM' U RM44 RM44 �, RM44 RM12 RM12 E HARRISON ST RFC-SD`.E HARRISON ST RM44 Z t, '' RM12 R w RM44 RM44 RM44 PRM . _ RFC- RM44 � RM12 RM12 D2 PRM PRM P � RM44 m RM44 RM44 RM44 RM12 -RNS12 yF RM RFC SD PRM Z aS RM44 Q RM44 RM44 RM44 RM12 U)i RRM12 0 PRMPRM PRM PRM PIM Z RM44 > RM44 RM12 w PRM PRM RFC -SD �k, R RFC -SD'° R RFC -SD PRM PR FC -SDS RFC -SD RM44 RM44 RM44 RM12 p RM12 RFC -Sb, RFC -SQ- RM44 RM - P2 'PRM P2 t'� PRM RFC -SD PRM RM44 RM 4; O RM12 PRM PRM RFC -SD PR' RFC-S� RFC_S11 RM44 a RM44 O RM44 RM12 ry - RNS12 PRM PRM RFC..SD W RM12 PRM RFC -SD RFCFC-SD RM44 RM z :RM44 RM12 RM12RNS12 -- RFC -CX, 'E PRENTISS ST PRM FC -SD 'RFC -SD CC2 RM44 RM44 RM O RM44 RM12 RM12, RM12 r� r�°friiir P __ R RM44 RM44 R R1M1 RM12 RM,12 b PRM :. PRM w C2 RM44 M44 RM44 BOWERY ST M44 CC ,• 'PRM � RFC-; 2 - - = — = — = — — --�tM�4� .r.: RNS12 PRM PRM RM PRM O RFC -CX _ PRM F PRM CO m FC -CX RM RM44 RM44 RM44 RM44 RM44 44 RM44 P2 O PRM PR Z p C11 RM44 RM44 RM44 RM44 RM4 RM44 RM44 RNS12 RM CC2 C p RM44 FC -CX / 44 RM44 RM44 RM44 RM44 RM44 v PRM PRMz RFC CX;, RM44 RM44 RM44 RM44 RNS12 FC CX�y_ w� C2 RM44 RM44 RM44 RM44 RM44 RM44 RM44 c;'ryyll - va _ RM44 RM44 RM44 RM12 _ * 17:7RM44 C11 RFC -CX 'A �_ RM44 RM44 RM12 �C11 - C62 �, ` +w RM44 RM44 C11 RFC -CX F, P1�M 1x�— RM44 RM12 RFC -CX CI1 RM44 RM44 RM44 C11 P2 "i CC2 RM44 RM44 RM44 RM12 I P1 C11 < d CI1" C11 C11 CC2 " `` 4 RM44 RM12 P2 CC2 �� R C11 s RM44 RM44 RM12 CI1 CC2 ` `® M44 RM44 RM12 C11 # CI1 CC2 `� RS8 e RM44 RM12 P1 xi:. P2 I�av�..": RS8 RS8y RM12 LAFAYETTE ST 7 P1 {j RS8 .,. RS8 m ' RS8 RS8 RS8 cn RS8 RS8 —G--- � � y RS8 RS8 z P1 P1 RS12 An application submitted by Davis Maxwell, Capstone Collegiate Z � W RS8 RSE� RS12 RS12 Communities LLC for the rezoning of approximately 1.6 acres at 91 o RS8 m °Rss RS8 RS8 Rss W RS12 RS12 VI 305 & 315 E Prentiss St & 635 S Gilbert Street from Communityi RS8 ?' Z *- Tee � PAGE ST 1, RS8 RS8 m8 - _ `'RS8 A RS8 RS8 RS8 Commercial (CC -2) and Intensive Commercial (CI -1) to Riverfront cllRss „RSA ? RS8 x, U) _� RS8 RS8 RS8 RS8 T7.1 tit" RS8 RS8 RS8 RS8 »- RSE Crossings - Central Crossings Subdistrict (RFC -CX). _ Rs8 Rss _ -' = RS8 RS8 $ R ��RS8 8 " RS8 RS8 'a RS8 RS8 RS8 ri1 r `. - C11 RSR �: RS8 Rosi sfiR RS8 # RS8 RCR R¢R RS8 RS8 e LU -IARRISON ST a - q +, f 'I ° •4 �� a � �z � '' J� � i { E PRENTISS ST P n �: l fid` ��• :d Ca LU Q WRIGHT r b U • Y��Y_ Jl ' w J c] 07 - �+ U) - 'U) IJ - V erre:. 1 • / P C Lit w ` LAFAYET TE ST An application submitted by Davis Maxwell, Capstone Collegiate Communities LLC for the rezoning of approximately 1.6 acres at 305 & 315 E Prentiss St & 635 S Gilbert Street from Community Commercial (CC -2) and Intensive Commercial (CI -1) to Riverfront Crossings - Central Crossings Subdistrict (RFC -CX). CITY OF IOWA CITY r � E .� ftL.-34 i Ate^• i ;J4 1 - r J z t W I VeW 0 a � m Q Z e �Vi R" s CITY OF IOWA CITY r � E .� ftL.-34 i Ate^• i ;J4 1 - r DEVELOPER: SUBMITTED TO: Planning Staff JULY 2, 2019 315 East Prentiss Street INTRODUCTION On behalf of Capstone Collegiate Communities and their Project Team, I am pleased to present to you our vision for the re -development of the properties located at 305 & 315 E. Prentiss and 625 S. Gilbert Street in Iowa City. Commonly referred to as 315 E Prentiss, the project promises to be a vibrant addition to Iowa City and the River Front Crossings District. The project will deliver high-quality, residential housing to a property that is on the east bank of Ralston Creek and currently used for an industrial use . The new residential tenants will be located close to public transportation, surrounded by highly regarded, locally owned dining establishments, and within a 10 - minute walk of downtown. All parking for the project will be located within the building footprint and the 4th level of the building will feature roof -top terraces, a clubroom, and fitness center for the private use of the building occupants. At street level, the banks of Ralston Creek will be stabilized and the floodplain buffer will be enhanced to create publicly accessible open space. Further, a pedestrian walkway will be added along the south side of the property to provide an opportunity for pedestrians on S. Gilbert Street to access Ralston Creek and enjoy the enhancements located along the banks. The Project Team and I look forward to working with the City of Iowa City to create a successful project for the developer and the city. MICHAEL WELCH Project Lead The project team consists of: OWNER / DEVELOPER: CAPSTONE COLLEGIATE COMMUNITIES, LLC OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE AXIOM CONSULTANTS, LLC NILES BOLTON ASSOCIATES CIVIL, STRUCTURAL, AND MEP ENGINEER: AXIOM CONSULTANTS, LLC W_101I9LY•1_1»_1: ]ImI19:101 LMO PARTNERS Project PROCESS THREE DISTINCT PHASES I i PHASE 1 Rezoning/Height Bonus May 2019 The rezoning phase of the project began in May of 2019 with the submission of a rezoning application. A change to the Regulating Plan will be sought concurrently with rezoning the property to River Front Crossings—Central Crossings District. A Level II Design Review will be required to achieve the desired eight -floors. The Project Team will commence work on the Design Review submissions once it is clear that P&Z and Council are supportive of rezoning. 9 MONTHS PHASE 2 Design Winter 2019– Spring 2020 A significant portion of the design process will occur during the Design Review process. This effort will continue upon the completion of the Design Review process and include geotechnical investigation and Phase II ESA. These efforts will culminate in an approved Site Plan and Building Plans early Spring of 2020 to allow construction to begin in 2020. The Project Team will work closely with city staff throughout the process to streamline the design to the extent possible. 18 MONTHS D u PHASE 3 Construction Summer 2020—Summer 2022 Construction is expected to begin in Summer 2020 upon the approval of a building and site design. The building is expected to take approximately 15-17 months, including Ralston Creek stabilization and right-of-way improvements. The building should be ready for an August 2022 occupancy. Section SITE NARRATIVE Master Plan COMPARISION FOOTPRINTS OF THE DEVELOPMENT AS COMPARED TO THE MASTER PLAN (PAGE 66) — _ I- IT17,Uq F a F.� V'3 1 4 agOP■ a UJ ' -._ - Ucc _ wrzx • IL # f W USW r # # - _ .# ■ a Ir" a 04 0 - �76 If 41D tt Plan diagram of the Central Sub -District from the Downtown and Riverfront Plan diagram of the Central Crossings Sub -District from the Downtown and Crossings Masterplan document with the 315 East Prentiss site outlined in red. Riverfront Crossings Masterplan document with the 315 East Prentiss site out - Note that in the Masterplan, the site lies within two sub -districts: Central Cross- lined in red and the proposed building footprint diagram overlaid. The Central ings and Gilbert Districts. Crossings Boundary has been adjusted to reflect the proposed changes to the Regulating Plan. Project FOOTPRINT A GENERAL OVERVIEW OF WHAT COMPRISES THIS EFFORT RESTORED RIPARIAN PRENTI55 ST VEGETATION (PROPOSED) " { V PROPERTY LINE r. a_ RETAIN GRADES WITH NATURAL MATERIALS FLOODWAY I ~ (FROM CITY MAPPING), �I « 30' FLOODWAY BUFFER 41 STAIR t 5' FLOODWAY BUFFER SETBACK 1 TERRACE B - I I 1 (LEVEL4) PUBLIC WALKWAY (AT GRADE) I STAIR • 1 i (PLAZA (AT GRADE) TERRA CEC (LEVEL -4) 771 I ;s O STAIR IOWA INTERSTATE RAILROAD CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY: PARCEL "A" AREA: +/- 1.60 ACRES APARTMENTS: 178 UNITS 1 400 BEDS 780 NSF/UNIT AVG 1 347 NSF/BED AVG 138,850 NRSF TOTAL LOBBY, LEASING E MAIL: 2,918 SF CLUBROOM & FITNESS: 5,514 SF —r i r,{ e RMB 55 - \ PARKING: 259 SPACES PROVIDED (249 REQ) —FK=V PLAZA I k PARKING RATIO: 1.45 SPACES/UNIT 1 0.65 SPACES/BED - LOBBY, LEASING Et MAIL \_ (GROUND LEVEL) BOWERY ST CLUB ROOM Et FITNESS_- (TERRACE LEVEL 4) r? MAIN FARWIING ACCESS FROM EASEMENT 8 STORY BU1,;LDING ti (5 RESIDENTIAL LEVELS OVER 3 PARKING LEVELS) SECONDARY PARKING w ACCESS FROM EASEMENT -` r The project will be comprised of a single eight (8) story building and a variety of improvements to Ralston Creek. The building consists of three floors of parking with five floors of residential, including a club room, fitness room, and 4th level terraces. Ralston Creek improvements cover creek stabilization and removal of invasive species as well as the construction of a pedestrian greenway along the east side of the creek. The space will be designed to encourage public use and pedestrian access to this under-utilized natural resource which flows through River Front Crossings Ralston Creek IMPROVEMENTS SAMPLE OF POTENTIAL CREEK ENHANCEMENTS /— A � orrag..�r t f pP'�u1DE Pa.HIr BVL x%/84,6 .4�/ W' + �se�rrt�O�I. a�:e l2.r wi�eh `Wn4v�c."'G ��e44r'^�t i7c`'rr�5 pssarv�e P°�f� ' _�tl 1, 11� 0 �.i.5 "L"¢7T'`�.�Y ��"I,I�'1 Cw �pl$vE �'G-✓ �eei5 $�f�• �TFyw,7.� ° R—A.+rSfonl c.rtr�.� j �rY,� ��`�A/e..,�ZRYor,.' k(TE"IY,rJ -r �+a..i%.�G�F� -. ,'hwovd F1.K�Ic #M`fs T pr.(aw sr} To r.b WI �`E�'rnr( - P4pnF4AJJ J rrf_ r '!; 4ww' wurrcW 7 w Z �N.rs,( t r .r.rp +e �u� euf-sf-s� 5rdd�r ►iq..e�r. 2 P4.wc . 4l+tga - pa ndss p� �FY Aa.#r:.� v.`eedi-. i �IAyLS T k�r� `s�erus+•Yall f�q'c'"+� •fir+.af. TYPICAL SECTION of PROPOSED RALSON CREEK IMPROVEMENTS REDISCOVERING A NATURAL FEATURE The restoration of the Ralston Creek corridor would include a multi -step design approach to restoring and improving portions of the creek to create an inviting amenity that will enhance the quality of life for the citizens of Iowa City. The first suggested step would be to remove the existing concrete structures and re -shape the creek channel and bank to mimic a more natural pattern. Stabilizing the banks with a combination of rock boulders or outcroppings and native plantings suitable for the riparian zone of the lower banks. Secondly, swales and pools running parallel to the creeks banks would be incorporated to reduce the floodwater velocity from upstream channelization. These features combined with the riparian plantings also provide an opportunity to capture stormwater from the adjacent sites and filter contaminants. Finally, engaging the public with the creek by connecting pathways and plazas through public open spaces along the creek can bring awareness that not only the creek exists, but can be made into an attractive natural amenity. Ultimately, restoring this portion of the creek could be used as a model for future developments along the creek corridor. Section SCALE Scale of BUILDINGS SIMILAR BUILDING SCALE COMPARISON MATRIX 620 Dubuque 736 FT Dubuque St NARRATIVE: The Rise 831 FT 315 5 Prentiss 225 Prentiss 742 FT 710 FT r =_ l l Ralston Creek 601 5 Gilbert 713 FT I S Gilbert St The Mansion 538 S Gilbert 729 FT Section diagram illustrating the elevational height of the tallest buildings in the South Downtown and Central Crossings dis- tricts visible along Prentiss, from Gilbert to Dubuque 315 E Prentiss will be located near the bottom of the Prentiss Street hill nestled along Ralston Creek in the valley between Gilbert Street and Dubuque Street. The natural rise in the topography surrounding the project site allows for the proposed 8—stories to meld into the neighborhood. The structure will compliment rather than dominate the surrounding buildings This exhibit shows a number of buildings and how they compare to the proposed construction of the 315 E Prentiss Project. The view of this exhibit is looking direction north with a west -to -east cut through the center of the property. 315 E Prentiss 602 S Dubuque 620 S Dubuque 225 E Prentiss Court & Linn PROJECT CAPSTONE DUBUQUE STREET DUBUQUE STREET DUBUQUE PH IV THE RISE YEAR 2022 (proposed) 2017 2018 2019 2018 STORIES ABOVE 8 (proposed) 4 4 4 15 GRADE APPROXIMATE 742 FT 724 FT 736 FT 710 FT 831 FT HEIGHT 315 E Prentiss will be located near the bottom of the Prentiss Street hill nestled along Ralston Creek in the valley between Gilbert Street and Dubuque Street. The natural rise in the topography surrounding the project site allows for the proposed 8—stories to meld into the neighborhood. The structure will compliment rather than dominate the surrounding buildings This exhibit shows a number of buildings and how they compare to the proposed construction of the 315 E Prentiss Project. The view of this exhibit is looking direction north with a west -to -east cut through the center of the property. Project MASSING CONCEPTUAL STREET -LEVEL VIEW OF SITE PLACEMENT Rendered street -level view looking Southeast from the intersection of Dubuque and Prentiss. Conceptual view showing the project located behind the Dubuque Phase IV—Pacha building at 225 E. Prentiss Street) (currently under construction) building at the center of the image (in gray). The Dubuque Phase I can be seen at the right of the image. NEIGHBORHOOD POINT -of -REFERENCE DIAGRAM. Northeast Corner of Dubuque Street and Prentiss Street Project MASSING CONCEPTUAL STREET -LEVEL VIEW OF SITE PLACEMENT Rendered street -level view looking North from the South Gilbert. Conceptual view showing the project located behind the Iowa Interstate Railroad. World of Bikes is located to the left of the image and Kennedy Plaza is right of the image. t - z NEIGHBORHOOD POINT -of -REFERENCE DIAGRAM: Intersection of South Gilbert and Maiden Lane Project MASSING CONCEPTUAL STREET -LEVEL VIEW OF SITE PLACEMENT Rendered street -level looking South from The Rise on Linn Street. Conceptual view showing the project located behind various apartments along Court Street. Proposed building just visible through tree line at right -center of image. NEIGHBORHOOD POINT -OF -REFERENCE DIAGRAM: The Rise Courtyard along Linn Street Project MASSING CONCEPTUAL STREET -LEVEL VIEW OF SITE PLACEMENT Rendered street -level looking west from the intersection of Prentiss and Gilbert Conceptual view showing the project located behind 601 S Gilbert St. Although the proposed building is substantially larger than the existing building located at 601 S Gilbert Street, the site topography reduces the overall impression of the mass of the building. NEIGHBORHOOD POINT -of -REFERENCE DIAGRAM: The intersection of Prentiss and Gilbert Section HEIGHT BONUS Height BONUS JUSTIFICATION FOR REQUEST REQUEST PER CODE: Per the City of Iowa City Riverfront Crossings District General Requirements, Article G, 14-2G-7, Section G: BUILDING HEIGHT PROVISIONS our team is requesting consideration for: The granting of additional bonus height in the amount of four (4) stories for the proposed building to be constructed at 315 East Prentiss Street. This would allow for construction of one 8 -story structure on the site which is the maximum allowed under the RIVER FRONT CROSSING: CENTRAL CROSSINGS SUB -DISTRICT. The code provides for a number of incentives for developments to incorporate features that provide both public benefits as well as important goals towards furthering the objectives of the overall downtown and Riverfront Crossings Master Plan. This project is eligible in a number of areas and we are specifically requesting to utilize two (2) different means in our overall request. Both of these areas is detailed in the subsequent sections to identify how we aim to achieve the associated goals. PUBLIC ART (14 -2G -7-G-6) HEIGHT BONUS FOR LEADERSHIP IN ENERGY EFFICIENCYAND ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN (14 -2G -7-G-7) Level II design review will be required for this project. As a result, the requested Height Bonus will be put before both the City's Design Review Committee and the City Council. Public Art 14 -2G -7-G-6 NARRATIVE of ELIGIBILITY. Per item 14 -2G -7-G-6 of the Iowa City code, one additional floor of building height may be granted for a contribution to the City's public art program equal to one percent (1 %) of threshold value of the project. Threshold value is the sum of all construction costs shown on all building permits associated with the project, including site preparation. Funds contributed shall be used by the City for public art within the Riverfront Crossings District as approved by the Public Art Committee. JUSTIFICATION of REQUIREMENTS: The Project Team believes that the project will improve the aesthetics and pedestrian experience along E. Prentiss Street. The creation of publicly accessible open space between the proposed building and the banks of Ralston Creek may lend itself to creating a location for public art. The team is looking forward to working with the members of the city's public art program to evaluate the opportunities to make the public art more than a check written to the city. Placing public art within the public space may add one more amenity and incentive to attract additional pedestrian traffic to the banks of Ralston Creek. REQUESTING: 1 floor Height Bonus for Energy Efficiency and Environmental Stewardship 14.2G -7-G-7 NARRATIVE of ELIGIBILITY: Per item 14 -2G -7-G-8 of the Iowa City code, up to four (4) additional floors of building height may be granted for projects that are designed to meet high standards with regard to energy efficiency and environmental stewardship, according to LEED or other similar environmental or energy efficiency rating system. In general, the higher the level of energy efficiency or environmental stewardship demonstrated, the greater the bonus. The amount of bonus granted will be based on the overall quality of the project. Bonus height may also be granted for projects that are designed to minimize the impact of stormwater runoff on the environment through the use of bioswales, rain gardens, green roofs, rainwater harvesting, and stream bank stabilization and restoration along Ralston Creek or the Iowa River, as described in the riverfront crossings district subarea plan adopted in April 2011. A long term maintenance plan must accompany any proposal for such green features. JUSTIFICATION of REQUIREMENTS: The Project Team believes that this property is uniquely situated to create a catalyst for the development of a pedestrian friendly and inviting place along Ralston Creek. The enhancements to Ralston Creek, the areas within the city right-of-way along Ralston Creek, and the floodway buffers associated with the waterway could serve as a greenway between Riverfront Crossings Park located at the south end of the District and E. Prentiss Street. The measures implemented on this Project could well be the template and standard for the numerous properties and projects located along Ralston Creek within Riverfront Crossings The Project Team is suggesting that the project go beyond the minimal measures required by adjacent CZAs (removal of invasive species and stream bank stabilization) and a fuller, bigger picture plan be implemented. Thsi plan could included pedestrian access directly to the waterway for canoe/kayak launch, stabilization with native vegetation or other measures that would ultimately result in a more sustainable and natural waterway, incorporation of a pedestrian access under the Iowa Interstate Railroad Bridge for future trail extension, inclusion of public education signage or components, and many other options. The project team truly believes that Ralston Creek is an amenity that has been overlooked and ignored for too long and welcome the opportunity to work with city staff and City Council to develop the right mix of amenities and improvements to the waterway and adjacent land. The building design will incorporate many features that are in accordance with the LEED certification system; however, consistent with City requirements, the Project Team will not seek LEED certification. REQUESTING: 3 floors requested (4 allowed) Height BONUS SYNOPSIS OF THE REQUEST NARRATIVE of ELIGIBILITY: The City of Iowa City code allows for ten (10) different methods for a developer to request additional height for a project. We are planning to make requests within two of these categories at the current time. # NAME 1 Public Art 2 LEED SECTION I ALLOWED REQUESTED JUSTIFICATION 14 -2G -7-G-6 1 1 1% of threshold value contribution 14 -2G -7-G-7 4 2 LEED Pursuant and Ralston Creek REQUEST NARRATIVE: Our team will be requesting the additional height for this project in order to maximize the site to its full potential. The project is consistent with the Master Plan and will create a strong anchor for the north end of Ralston Creek rehabilitation south of Downtown. REQUEST NUMBERS: 4 total floors requested FLOORS ALLOWED IN BASE ZONE = 4 FLOORS REQUESTED BY BONUS HEIGHT = 4 TOTAL FLOORS PROPOSED ACROSS THE SITE = 8 Item Number: 10.b. +r p- W�rm�M CITY O� IOWA CITY www.icgov.org September 17, 2019 Resolution approving the Preliminary Plat and Sensitive Areas Development Plan of Tamarack Ridge Subdivision, Iowa City, lowa.(SUB19-09) ATTACHMENTS: Description PZ Staff Report wAttachments Preliminary Plat PZ Meeting Minutes Resolution To: Planning and Zoning Commission Item: SUB19-08 Tamarack Ridge GENERAL INFORMATION: STAFF REPORT Prepared by: Anne Russett, Senior Planner Date: August 15, 2019 Applicant: TRD, LLC 221 E Burlington St Iowa City, IA 52240 319-631-1894 gjc1974@outlook.com Property Owner: Requested Action: Purpose: Location: Location Map: Monument Farms, LLC 319-331-4113 Approval of preliminary plat Tamarack Ridge Subdivision; To create 60 single- family lots and one outlot South of Scott Blvd and North of Tamarack Trl Size: Existing Land Use and Zoning Surrounding Land Use and Zoning Comprehensive Plan: District Plan: Neighborhood Open Space District Public Meeting Notification: File Date: 45 Day Limitation Period: BACKGROUND INFORMATION: K 36.81 Acres Undeveloped, Interim Development Single - Family Residential (ID -RS) North: ID -RS — Interim Development Single - Family Residential South: RS5 — Low Density Single -Family Residential East: ID -RS — Interim Development Single - Family Residential ID -RP — Interim Development Research Park West: ID -RP — Interim Development Research Park ORP — Office Research Park Zone Conservation Design Northeast District, Single -Family NE1 Property owners located within 300' of the project site received notification of the Planning and Zoning Commission public meeting. Subdivision signs were also posted on the site. July 19, 2019 September 2, 2019. The applicant, TDR, LLC has submitted an application for a preliminary plat for the Tamarack Ridge Subdivision, an approximately 36.81 -acre subdivision containing 60 single- family lots and one outlot located south of Scott Boulevard and north of Tamarack Trail. The applicant has also requested a rezoning for this area from the Interim Development Single -Family Residential (ID -RS) zone to the Low Density Single -Family Residential (RS -5) zone. The Commission reviewed the rezoning at its meeting on July 18, 2019 and recommended approval subject to the following two conditions: 1. Substantial compliance with the preliminary plat (attached) in that the identified traffic circles are incorporated into the final design of the extension of Tamarack Trail. 3 2. Owner shall develop a landscaping plan that identifies the location and species of 75 right-of-way trees to be planted by Owner or its successor(s) in interest along Tamarack Trail. Said trees shall be planted prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for each lot, or, if said certificate of occupancy is issued during a poor planting season, by May 31 following issuance of the certificate of occupancy. Said landscaping plan shall be approved by the City Forestry Division prior to the approval of any final plat subdividing any of the above-described real estate. Said landscaping plan shall include a diverse mix of trees planted generally 30' apart, though the City recognizes that exact locations may vary depending on driveway locations, signage and other utility conflicts. Final location and species of the trees shall be approved on a lot -by -lot basis prior to issuance of a building permit for each lot. The applicant has used the good neighbor policy. A good neighbor meeting was held on Monday, June 10. The summary of the meeting is attached. ANALYSIS: Compliance with Comprehensive Plan: The Future Land Use Map of the Comprehensive Plan has designated this area for Conservation Design. The Conservation Design land use designation is applied to areas containing steep slopes, woodlands, or other sensitive features. The Northeast District Plan identifies this area mostly for single-family residential development with some more intense residential and commercial uses allowed closer to Scott Blvd. Furthermore, the comprehensive plan supports development that is contiguous and connected. The preliminary plat shows the extension of Tamarack Trail north to Scott Boulevard, which will help to achieve the plan's goal of interconnected street networks. Interconnected street networks provide multiple travel routes resulting in diffusion and distribution of traffic, efficient routes for public and emergency services, and provide direct and continuous vehicular and pedestrian travel routes. Subdivision Design: The subdivision includes 60 single-family lots, which meet the dimensional requirements of the RS -5 zone. The minimum lot frontage in the RS -5 zone is 45 feet and the proposed lots meet the minimum requirement. The proposed lot sizes range from 9,297 square feet to 33,684 square feet, which exceed the minimum lot size requirement of 8,000 square feet in the RS -5 zone. The subdivision design includes the extension of Tamarack Trail north to Scott Boulevard, as well as the creation of a new street, Buckle Down Circle. Buckle Down Circle, located approximately halfway between Scott Boulevard and the current terminus of Tamarack Trail, ends in a cul-de-sac due to the steep topography further west. Considering the existing topography, sensitive areas, and development constraints, street connections to the west and the east of the proposed development are highly unlikely. Without these connections the block length is longer than desired, which results in concerns related to travel speeds. Therefore, the preliminary plat incorporates two traffic circles. These physical barriers will be the most effective means of reducing travel speeds. In addition, the curb -to -curb pavement width of the Tamarack Trail extension is 26 feet, which is the minimum allowed per code and allows on -street parking on one side of the street. The traffic circles and the reduced pavement width will help with traffic calming. n The subdivision also shows the continuation of the existing sidewalks north to Scott Boulevard and incorporates pedestrian crossings at Buckle Down Circle and Scott Boulevard across Tamarack Trail. The sidewalks throughout the subdivision are 5 feet. Traffic Implications: Using the Institute of Traffic Engineers Trip Generation Manuai(91 Edition), staff estimates that the total traffic generated by the proposed (60) lots would produce approximately 571 trips per day to/from the development. The anticipated trips generated would either access N. 1St Avenue (via Hickory Trail) or Scott Boulevard (via the proposed connection of Tamarack Trail). For comparison, the existing development that accesses N. 1St Avenue via Hickory Trail has approximately 121 households and produces approximately 1,152 trips per day using one access point. Provided the additional access to Scott Boulevard (via Tamarack Trail), the total trips accessing N. 1St Avenue would likely be reduced even when adding the proposed 60 lots. In 2018, Scott Boulevard had an average daily traffic count of approximately 5,100 near the proposed connection of Tamarack Trail and N. 1St Avenue had an average daily traffic count of approximately 7,500 near the intersection of Hickory Trail (Iowa DOT). Given that the theoretical capacity of a two-lane arterial street is conservatively more than 14,000 trips per day, the additional traffic generated by the development alone will not over- burden Scott Boulevard or N. 1St Avenue as currently constructed. Currently, the intersection of N. 1St Avenue and Scott Boulevard experiences congestion during peak travel times. While the estimated additional trips from the development are relatively low compared with total average daily traffic volumes, the additional trips will have an impact on the intersection during peak hours. However, the City currently has a Capital Improvements Project scheduled for 2020 to address this issue either by constructing a roundabout or by signalizing the intersection. Environmentally Sensitive Areas: The site contains several sensitive areas, including critical and protected slopes and woodlands. The preliminary plat indicates that the development will disturb 12% of the critical slopes and none of the protected slopes. The City's sensitive areas ordinance allows the disturbance of up to 35% of critical slopes before a level II sensitive areas review is required. In terms of woodlands, the preliminary plat indicates that the development will meet the retention requirement of 50% per the sensitive areas ordinance. Table 1 provides a summary of the woodlands. The preliminary plat shows a conservation easement over the preserved woodland and the woodland buffer areas. Table 1. Woodlands Summa 5 The City's sensitive areas inventory also identifies this area as having potential archaeological resources. The applicant has contracted with the Office of the State Archaeologist who is currently conducting an archaeological study. Neighborhood Open Space: Open space dedication or fees in lieu of are addressed at the time of final platting. Based on the 36.81 acres of RS -5 zoning, the developer would be required to dedicate 0.79 acres of land or pay fees in -lieu. Due to the proximity of Calder Park, which is 0.3 miles from the southern edge of the project site, an in -lieu fee payment would be appropriate. Storm Water Management: The preliminary plat identifies three storm water management basins. Public Works staff has reviewed the preliminary grading plans and the preliminary storm water management calculations. Staff has identified some developed areas where run-off is not being captured in the storm water management basins. These areas have topographic constraints that will make it difficult for all run-off to be captured in the storm water management basins. Public Works staff is currently working with the applicant to identify the amount of flow not captured in the basins and ways to mitigate this run-off. Infrastructure Fees: The City requires developers to pay a $456.75 per acre fee for water service. The project site is not located in one of the City's sanitary sewer districts, and therefore, the City collects no sanitary sewer tap on fees. The developer will be responsible for costs associated with the water and sanitary sewer improvements needed to serve the project site. NEXT STEPS: Upon recommendation of approval of the preliminary plat and sensitive areas development plan by the Planning and Zoning Commission, the preliminary plat will be considered with the proposed rezoning by the City Council. After approval of the rezoning and preliminary plat the applicant may submit an application for the final plat. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Upon resolution of the deficiencies listed below, staff recommends approval of SUB19-08, an application submitted by TDR, LLC for a Preliminary Plat and Sensitive Areas Development Plan for Tamarack Ridge subdivision, a 60 -lot, 36.81 -acre residential subdivision located south of Scott Boulevard and north of Tamarack Trail. DEFICIENCIES AND DISCREPANCIES: 1. Applicant must submit an archaeological study for compliance with the sensitive areas ordinance. 2. Public Works staff must approve the preliminary grading plans and the preliminary storm water management calculations. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Location Map 2. Aerial Photograph 3. Good Neighbor Meeting Summary M 4. Preliminary Plat and Sensitive Areas Development Plan, Received August 1, 2019 Approved by: Danielle Sitzman, AICP, Development Services Coordinator Department of Neighborhood and Development Services N W* -E SUB19-8 S Tamarack Ridge 0 0.075 0.15 0.3 Miles I i I i I A I ',' ! ■ ■ Prepared By: Jade Pederson Date Prepared: July 2019 d 2 Y O -_o- � �—.•� I` m Y e� i f • ( c7 ° e 1 HICKORY TRL - y: \\ g An application submitted by TRD, LLC CIR for preliminary plat approval for Tamarack °� ; Ridge, a 36.81 -acre, 60 -lot and one outlot <� located South Scott Blvd subdivision, of and North of Tamarack Trail. Ro�NEs; °oo �qR - L, CN 1N , AXIOMCONSULTANTS CIVIL • STRUCTURAL - MECHANICAL • ELECTRICAL • SURVEY • SPECIALTY MEMORANDUM PROJECT: Tamarack Ridge (190042) DATE: July 10, 2019 TO: Anne Russett — City of Iowa City SUBJECT Good Neighbor Meeting Summary A Good Neighbor meeting was held on June 10, 2019 for the Tamarack Ridge Development. Invitations were mailed to each household located on Tamarack Trail, Hickory Trail, Hickory Place, Cypress Trail, Bluffwood Drive, and Evergreen Court. This exceeds the 300 -foot requirement, but the development team felt it was important to make all those potentially impacted aware of the project. The meeting was held at First Presbyterian Church of Iowa City located at 2701 Rochester Avenue in Iowa City. The meeting lasted from 5:30pm until 7:00pm and an open house format was used. In addition to myself, the developers, Joe Clark and Doug Paul, were present. We had two large concept plans laid out for the neighbors to review and Doug, Joe, and I answered questions and provided an overview of the development. The meeting was well attended; however, only one of the meeting attendees signed in on the available sign in sheet. The concerns expressed by the neighbors can be summarized as follows: - What will be proposed zoning be? Will there be multi -family development? - The proposed single-family lots are narrower than those currently on Tamarack Trail. At time of the meeting the narrowest lots were 68 -feet wide. Will this negatively impact the property values for the existing residents? - The proposed side yard setbacks are only 5 -feet (consistent with city RS -5 zoning). Will houses being built closer together have a negative impact on the character of the existing neighborhood? - There will be additional traffic on Tamarack Trail and Hickory Trail as the new residents travelled south to 1St Avenue rather than north to N. Scott Boulevard. - Will the extension of Tamarack Trail to N. Scott Boulevard encourage drivers to cut through the neighborhood to avoid the 4 -way stop and N. Scott Boulevard and 1 st Avenue? - Will the existing wooded areas be removed or cleared for the development? - Some neighbors were under the impression that the land within the proposed development was part of a preservation area and could not be developed. Other neighbors expressed support for the project and were please to learn that the development would be RS -5 single- family zoning, would preserve wooded areas within the conservation easements, and would incorporate traffic circles along the extension of Tamarack Trail to provide traffic calming measures and discourage traffic from traveling too fast through the neighborhood. Sincerely, Michael J" Welch, PE Associate Principal LEGAL DESCRIPTION P R E LI M I NARY P LAT & SENSITIVE BEING A PART OF AUDITOR S PARCEL2 19027 AS RECORDED IN 62 AT PAGE 399 OF THE JOHNSON COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE IN THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (NW 41 ) AND SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW 1) OF SECTION 1, TOWNSHIP 79 NORTH, RANGE 6 WEST, IOWA CITY, JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA DESCRIBED AS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID AUDITOR'S PARCEL 20109027, THENCE S88°36'04"W, 10.00 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH RIGHT RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF SCOTT BOULEVARD TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, THENCE S01°24'49"E, 1,000.00 FEET; THENCE N88°35'11"E, 10.00 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF AUDITOR'S PARCEL 20109027; THENCE S01°24'49"E ALONG SAID WEST LINE 824.28 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID PARCEL S87°08'19"W, 644.61 FEET, THENCE S88°03'52"W, 299.26 FEET; THENCE NO3°23'42"W, 1140.29 FEET; THENCE N35°56'44"E, 599.09 FEET; THENCE N18°30'51"E, 240.00 FEET TO THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF SCOTT BOULEVARD; THENCE 61.79 FEET ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE ON A 955.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTH (CHORD BEARING N86°43'55"E, 61.78 FEET); THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE N88°36'04"E, 466.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. DESCRIBED AREA CONTAINS 36.58 ACRES AND IS SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS AND OTHER RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD. AREAS DEVELOPMENT PLAN TAMARACK RIDGE IOWA CITY, IOWA \ T� S, — 5 -- \ III I � — 80' — — _ A 70' 0' — 7 — I N A I I E I W I'o III,z F— 133E I 321 O�F + O J k� I I} p II� II/ ,I �— 1 QUI m I I1 I \ 1� - _ _ p I I - I� 2'� N 5 70 70 + 70' 1 TORM WATER + \\, ANAGEMENT' \ \O �'j BASIN + V\ A / / + vmoi I x . - ,� = +++ T ,- I/ /, + + \ I + r + + + wz \ ++ 0 0 a \ CURVE TABLE CURVE # LENGTH RADIUS DELTA CHORD DIR. CHORD LEN. C1 61.79 955.00 POINT OF COMMENCEMENT \ 61.78 a _ / NE CORNER OF AUDITOR'S "I I PARCEL 20109027 UTILITY POLE 100% LIGHT POLE POINT OF BEGINNING GAS VALVE 8 SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE SS STORM SEWER MANHOLE J I I 1 95 70' 7s1 -- 70' 70' 52% 35 0 36-11 37-3 38_3 39 s m I 14;205SF � "' 10,500SF "' 10,500SF Ln 10,5005E `� I 10,5005E w'�Im z1N =1 'r+,�•+�+ +sem +�+� I E/ +�++�+ \ L_\\ I mm�a ary 3 1 — — —i70' — -- 70' 70' FENCE: WOOD AL— 80 70-I o \ T� S, — 5 -- \ III I � — 80' — — _ A 70' 0' — 7 — I N A I I E I W I'o III,z F— 133E I 321 O�F + O J k� I I} p II� II/ ,I �— 1 QUI m I I1 I \ 1� - _ _ p I I - I� 2'� N 5 70 70 + 70' 1 TORM WATER + \\, ANAGEMENT' \ \O �'j BASIN + V\ A / / + vmoi I x . - ,� = +++ T ,- I/ /, + + \ I + r + + + wz \ ++ 0 0 a \ CURVE TABLE CURVE # LENGTH RADIUS DELTA CHORD DIR. CHORD LEN. C1 61.79 955.00 3°42'25" N86° 43' 55"E 61.78 LINE TABLE LINE # LENGTH BEARING L2 10.00 N88° 35' 11"E F—Li 10.00 S88° 36' 04"W PROJECT VICINITY MAP -CITY OF IOWA CITY OPROJECT LOCATION NDUBUQUE RD �N = S j '3'w 0 Y Z D W EVERGRE N U 'y HICKORY TRAIL R.aCst"n Creek WOOD d aR c- o NOT TO SCALE - 5:29pm S:\PROJECTS\190042\05 Design Civil -Survey Plats 190042 Prelim + + (+ice + + +,, + + + + + , + + +\+ + + \ + + + +' \ +++++� `+++++,+ + + \ \ + \ \ \ \ + ++++ + + + \+ J + ni�Trc�_ 1. ZONING AND ASSOCIATED MINIMUM LOT INFORMATION AREAS FOLLOWS: LOT PROPOSED MINIMUM MINIMUM MINIMUM REQUIRED SETBACKS NUMBERS ZONING FRONTAGE WIDTH AREA FRONT SIDE REAR T- 17 ' ss 77' — — — 2 -6SF—I `' _� + *�►� _ *AI• ' A 3 I 16,443SF 18,764SF I 16,377SF 17,575S -F 17,322SF 11 - + CQ e no 'col D + + + ++ + + + + + + + 3' + + + + + + YY + + + + + + +�+--+ ± + 7" – +++++++++++++..+++++ \ / + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + `C + + + -+ + + ++++++++++-++++ + + + + •� �, ++.++ +++++++ ++++`+�+++ +�+++++++++++++++ +++++++ )STORMW R� + + + + + + + + + + + + + +�+ \, i + + + + + + + + + + + +. + + + + "MANAGEM N ` + + + + �+� + + + + + +/+ + + +C+ + � } \ ++\++�+/+++C+++++++,i++++++++ +++++ + I BASIN I \ - _ + + ✓+ + + + _v_+ + ++/+++ + + + + + + — ++++++*+++++++++++++++++ + + + I f*f \ _ +++++++++++++`++ +++++++++++++ ++ ++fn + ++++++++++++++/++/++ \yl��/ -1 +00 ++++++� %+++ +++++)+++1++++ , y% + + + ++ + + + + + + +%+ + + + + `— + + + + + + . + + ... + ,� + 4 + + x, ++_++ ++�++++/++ ++++ / / x + + +++ \+�++ + + + + + ++++/4+++ + + + + + + + + % + x ST ST ST ST ST W 51 LOT 25 LOT 24 OUTLOT B DETAIL 5' LOT 9 LOT 8 \ OUTLOT C DETAIL LEGEND: 5 15 UTI LITI ES EXISTING COMMUNICATIONS ccos (I_o) ELECTRIC (E) (E) GAS (e) (G) SANITARY SEWER (s) (s) STORM (ST) (sT WATER: DOMESTIC (w) (w) GUY WIRE ANCHOR E— UTILITY POLE 100% LIGHT POLE 1',s GAS VALVE 8 SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE SS STORM SEWER MANHOLE ST HYDRANT 21% WATER VALVE 52% CURB STOP 100% SITE EXISTING CONTOUR - INDEX — 100 — — CONTOUR - INTERMEDIATE 1 0 1 FENCE: BARB WIRE — x _x _x — FENCE: CHAIN LINK o 0 0 FENCE: WIRE— fV FENCE: WOOD ❑ ❑ ❑ SIGN o CONSTRUCTION AREA LIMITS w TREE REMOVAL LIMITS AT EDGE w 2 _5 OF CONSERVATION EASEMENT m N 2 LL SENSITIVE AREAS AREA STEEP SLOPE (18-25%) Lu n N CRITICAL SLOPE (25-40%) 5 15 2. THIS PROPERTY LIES WITHIN FEMA PANEL 19103CO215E (2/16/2007). THERE ARE NO MAPPED FLOODPLAINS IMPACTED CRITICAL SLOPE (25-40%) 2 PROTECTED SLOPE (> 40%) TIMES THE HEIGHT OF THE SLOPE IS PROVIDED. WOODLAND PRESERVATION +++++++ + + + + + + + + + ++++++ IMPACTED WOODLAND CRITICAL SLOPE CALCULATION AREA (SF) AREA (ACRES) LOT DIMENSIONS IMPACTED SLOPES 29,530 0.68 LOT DIMENSION ALONG PROPERTY LINE 45' LOT WIDTH AT SETBACK LINE 60' PROPOSED — co co E E — G G Is SS ST ST —WW 6 • O Ak e PROPOSED 1�l � 1�1 —x —x —x — BUFFER CODE MIN. = 45' CODE MIN. = 60' 0 N1714 fV �' lD z J � M 0(/)2 O ` U Oz U° U O X w Lu z '3 <z Lu a w o F_ N 0 0 0 V (n Ow J z z Q z u o > O w z cc Q O V w 0 wQ CC w H co z Lu 60' RIGHT-OF-WAY 26' 1' S' 11' 13' 13' 11' S' 1' r -I ° g I o 7" PCC O 1.50% 4.00% a PAVEMENT 4.00% 1' ��° , • ' (V —� 2.00% d 2.00% �— W 4" SIDEWALK uj o 6" SUBBASE o Lu 6" SUBDRAIN NU oQ +++++ Uc \ � VO D 1,140.29' __ I� �u sojj GAG g� \ \, ^�s\$ lb9QC � IMPACTED QUANTITIES: KEY NOTES: ALL RS -5 45' 60' 8,000 SF 15 5 15 2. THIS PROPERTY LIES WITHIN FEMA PANEL 19103CO215E (2/16/2007). THERE ARE NO MAPPED FLOODPLAINS ON THIS PROPERTY. 2 3. THERE ARE PROTECTED SLOPES WITHIN THE BOUNDARY OF THE DEVELOPMENT. A BUFFER EQUAL TO 2 TIMES THE HEIGHT OF THE SLOPE IS PROVIDED. 6,287 4. THE TOTAL PERCENTAGE IMPACTED CRITICAL SLOPE IS LESS THAN 35% OF THE TOTAL. 8,612 CRITICAL SLOPE CALCULATION AREA (SF) AREA (ACRES) PERCENTAGE IMPACTED SLOPES 29,530 0.68 12% NON -IMPACTED SLOPES 171,346 3.93 70% NON -IMPACTED SLOPES IN PROTECTED SLOPE BUFFER 45,300 1.04 18% CRITICAL SLOPES (PRIOR TO DEVELOPMENT) 246,176 5.65 100% 5. THERE ARE WOODED AREAS WITHIN THE BOUNDARY OF THE DEVELOPMENT. CONSERVATION EASEMENTS ARE PROPOSED FOR THE PURPOSE OF PRESERVING PORTIONS OF THE WOODED AREAS. PER IOWA CITY CODE, A MINIMUM OF 50% OF THE EXISTING WOODLANDS MUST BE PRESERVED. 29,530 WOODLAND PRESERVATION CALCULATION AREA (SF) AREA (ACRES) PERCENTAGE DISTURBED WOODLAND 219,157 5.031 27% BUFFER (50' WIDE) 171,460 3.936 21% PRESERVED WOODLAND 415,297 9.534 52% WOODLAND (PRIOR TO DEVELOPMENT) 805,914 18.501 100% 6. THERE ARE NO STREAM CORRIDORS WITHIN THE BOUNDARY OF THE DEVELOPMENT. 7. ALL PROPOSED WATERMAIN TO BE 8". ALL PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER TO BE 8". CRITICAL SLOPES LOCATION AREA (SF) 1 2,026 2 2,277 3 6,287 O4 8,612 O5 188 © 3,150 \ 4,731 O8 950 O9 1,309 Q cr_ Z c G< TOTAL 29,530 WOODLANDS LOCATION AREA (SF) A 1,282 Og 2,417 C 22,085 Op 135,469 O 17,353 \ 40,552 DC TOTAL 219,158 R 20' i 6' 4' 6' I SECTION A -A LOTS 3/4, 13/14, 20/21, 23/24, 31/32 TYPICAL 26' ROADWAY SECTION 20' DRAINAGE AND STORM SEWER EASEMENT © 20' DRAINAGE EASEMENT © CONSERVATION EASEMENT HATCHED AREA REPRESENTS AREA INCLUDED IN WOODLAND RETENTION CALCULATION MAILBOX CLUSTER. 10x10 OUTLOT WITH (2) 16 -UNIT BOXES. REFER TO OUTLOT B AND OUTLOT C DETAIL 15' PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT OWNER / APPLICANT: TAMARACK DEVELOPMENT, LLC JOE CLARK 221 E. BURLINGTON ST IOWA CITY, IA 52240 NOT TO SCALE OUTLOT SIZE (SF) INTENDED USE A 493,161 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT & CONSERVATION EASEMENT B 100 MAILBOX CLUSTER. C 100 MAILBOX CLUSTER. ROW 149,389 RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATED TO CITY FOR TAMARACK TRAIL AND BUCKLE DOWN CIRCLE OUTLOTS A, B & C ARE TO BE MAINTAINED AND OWNED BY HOME OWNERS ASSOCIATION. AREAS WITHIN TRAFFIC CIRCLES ARE TO BE MAINTAINED BY HOME OWNERS ASSOCIATION APPLICANT'S ATTORNEY: JOHN BEASLEY 321 E. MARKET ST IOWA CITY, IA 52245 APPROVED BY THE CITY OF IOWA CITY, IOWA CITY CLERK DATE PREPARED BY: AXIOM CONSULTANTS, LLC MICHAEL J. WELCH, PE 60 E. COURT STREET, UNIT 3 IOWA CITY, IOWA 52240 U J _J ww Q 0 0 clC O DC Q w cr- U Q cr_ Z c G< Q z G w I— 0 wQ U I— w 1= z z Q J Q Lu z = 06 z w w QLU 0 fV J i- oC i w z O � O z w w rl w 2 _5 Q m N 2 LL z W w cr w z 0 w Lu n N Q Lu N GRADING PLAN TAMARACK RIDGE IOWA CITY, IOWA -- - - --- ---- -- O7- / I- V - - o - - - - - - - - x+ -max -x-xX x �/ I /� I �/ C)� --��� - ��� \ \ 3 I x 11 145 1146 I I 40 11 41 h�j2 11 43 44 47 II 36 II 37 r�38 39 ` == 10 5005E 10,500SF- x �95� % 11,1265E 12,1975E 48 3 I 14, 055E 10,5005E 10,5005E + + / 1i 10,4995E + + 10,5005E I �3,4965F / 10 5005E J _ o 1 4 80 70-'+m l r + + +I I / 15,421SF / \y�_+�/ = 13 * I + + + E 00 804 804 \ - - L _ J /� + an + 5 a- x 1 ' ' -�i= _ - 19,5955E - - - - �* � 52 / \ T - \ - *� 3185E 5 3 / I I 5 0 __1D V, S5: - 55 SS ss - SS -t- SS S SS S SS I _ _ _ 5 *2�* �I --I- �I II 9 60 -�\ ` 20,444 5 5 5 6 5 S 26 64 - - - ' 54 - F - -- SF 45F � � `'��-� 19,0495!= 5 7\ 23;5 2SF � 22,�7SF � - x � F A O * 19,287SF 19,392SF 19,779SF I� so - - Q q E $ \ ss + I I + E _ / 7 -I 1 I I ss 7g6 + + ml + _ _- -I - 22 / _ - - _ _ _ _ - �SQ (s) + * + / ss \ - " X 12, 675E �2 445 2 - 3 3 \ � � 3,410SNr 114,0005E 1 I � 1 11,9335E - � sz ss ss 14,00051^ I 13,9995E 12,797SF } I + /I I } 14,00 SF �0 0 F I / O 13,0005E O ss \ CKTRA \ I 14,0005E p p 8, ,685E A I � - -_ x \ 13, OSF � � �� � / I F z z (u A I J 12,�OSF =N v _--�- m *, s y, i IS- O T I \ _ Q _ + * + + � T4,976SF � 35F _ - - i 11,77 + I 3 I I 2" - / - * 16,443SF ; 20,8365E 4 - 18,764SF 16,3775E r I / / \ \ I 17,322SF 1 3145 17,5755E I \ + \-'STORM WATEi - _ �I I � I I +1/ - T RMWAT R _\, \ V \`\ rP�� T r / �� MANAGEMEN NAGEME �p \ \\ \ \\\ �\ , 1� I I +� 1 ♦,� \ I I I ' - - i \ - BASIN' xl - BASIN \\ \ \ �n�n�u n�u�n�n ILII n�rl n�u IIII J / f _ 2 - _ _ \ 1 6SF --- �� c + 13, SF \ a I _ I\V l � I r + I\I 46 �� -- �v�"1 + IS 493,161 SF A \ c ) 16,28 / \ o I \III / - 90 2,5 $F A V C \\ / r:l M W AGEM 33,x€ - v \ I \/\� // ) BASIN \ - 27,06 \\ -_ - - ( \ \ \\ \ 1 \ \ _ I� \ c - - /\ / v \ LC LEGEND: 20' DRAINAGE AND STORM SEWER EASEMENT J UTI LITI ES EXISTING PROPOSED COMMUNICATIONS ccm (co) -co ca - ELECTRIC (E) EE; - E E - GAS <G) (G) - G G - SANITARY SEWER (s) (S) -SS SS - STORM (ST) IST) -ST ST - WATER: DOMESTIC (W) (W) - W W - GUY WIRE ANCHOR E- E - UTILITY POLE > F. - LIGHT POLE lCX X`C GAS VALVE ® 6 SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE SS • STORM SEWER MANHOLE ST 0/ HYDRANT o WATER VALVE 0 CURB STOP ® e SITE EXISTING PROPOSED CONTOUR - INDEX 100 100 CONTOUR - INTERMEDIATE it FENCE: BARB WIRE - x - x - x - FENCE: CHAIN LINK FENCE: WIRE -i/ -ii -"- FENCE: WOOD ❑ ❑ - SIGN o CONSTRUCTION AREA LIMITS - + - + - + - TREE REMOVAL LIMITS SILT FENCE OVERLAND FLOW ROUTE KEY NOTES: O /1 N N lD I cn r -I J r_1 M OV) ` OU OZ V° U O x Lu Lu z z Z Lu W 0 i N Q N 0 %.ofN ow J Z Q z u LL Lu O w Z� Q O du o� w 0 Lu Q w CO Z Lu u 0 20' DRAINAGE AND STORM SEWER EASEMENT J Z O) J w o Q w o r -I F J o O © 20' DRAINAGE EASEMENT Q LL' oC fV Q OC Q2Q W_ fV © CONSERVATION EASEMENT > F. - Zo HATCHED AREA REPRESENTS AREA INCLUDED W N NOTE: IN WOODLAND RETENTION CALCULATION o o L7 0 NDU-1 Lu MAILBOX CLUSTER. D V U a Q o 0 15' PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT Q z 0 J Z J w o Q w o F J o u Lu w Q LL' oC U Q OC Q2Q z2 "Q d o wQ u Z U F J u Lu w o a N z Q Zo J O NOTE: �I L7 1. GRADING SHOWN IS PRELIMINARY. FINAL GRADES z WILL BE ESTABLISHED WITH CONSTRUCTION Q c DRAWINGS. z Q z 0 W W w w r14x N x V1 LEGAL DESCRIPTION P R E L I M I N A RY P LAT & S E N S 1 T I V E BEING A PART OF AUDITOR'S PARCEL 2019027 AS RECORDED IN BOOK 62 AT PAGE 399 OF THE JOHNSON COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE IN THE NORTHWEST( UARTER NW i ) AND SOUTHWEST QUARTER Q 4 (SW 4) OF SECTION 1, TOWNSHIP 79 NORTH, RANGE 6 WEST, IOWA CITY, JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA DESCRIBED AS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID AUDITOR'S PARCEL 20109027, THENCE S88°36'04"W, 10.00 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH RIGHT RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF SCOTT BOULEVARD TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, THENCE S01°24'49"E, 1,000.00 FEET; THENCE N88°35'11"E, 10.00 FEETTO THE WEST LINE OF AUDITOR'S PARCEL 20109027; THENCE S01°24'49"E ALONG SAID WEST LINE 824.28 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID PARCEL S87°08'19"W, 644.61 FEET, THENCE S88°03'52"W, 299.26 FEET; THENCE NO3°23'42"W, 1140.29 FEET; THENCE N35°56'44"E, 599.09 FEET; THENCE N18°30'51"E, 240.00 FEET TO THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF SCOTT BOULEVARD; THENCE 61.79 FEET ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE ON A 955.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTH (CHORD BEARING N86°43'55"E, 61.78 FEET); THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE N88°36'04"E, 466.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. DESCRIBED AREA CONTAINS 36.58 ACRES AND IS SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS AND OTHER RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD. AREAS DEVELOPMENT PLAN TAMARACK RIDGE IOWA CITY, IOWA + + + I \ ♦ + +\+ + + + 24 ` \ ++ 0++ -77 p+++ a + ob CURVE TABLE CURVE # LENGTH POINT OF COMMENCEMENT % NE CORNER OF DELTA AUDITOR'S wm,olo I / PARCEL 20109027 61.79 955.00 3°42'25" POINT OF BEGINNING e x WATER: DOMESTIC - (W (W) GUY WIRE ANCHOR E -- UTILITY UTILITY POLE 1 �5 - C 36 -JI 37-1 LIGHT POLE 14,I205SF Ln 1 LI)� 110,SO�F� 4¢ � 3 � 110,500SF E L - � / --- 3 -� L _ - - �o' 7 o�, 80' STORM SEWER MANHOLE 1 + + + I \ ♦ + +\+ + + + 24 ` \ ++ 0++ -77 p+++ a + ob CURVE TABLE CURVE # LENGTH RADIUS DELTA CHORD DIR. CHORD LEN. C1 61.79 955.00 3°42'25" N86° 43' 55"E 61.78 LINE TABLE LINE # LENGTH BEARING L1 10.00 S88° 36'04"W L2 10.00 N88° 35' 1111E PROJECT VICINITY MAP -CITY OF IOWA CITY OPROJECT LOCATION NDUBUQUE RD OGS O� 0 Y z D EVERORE 4 a A� HICKORY TRAIL Ralston Creek W 0 0 D � G\R G U a0OQ ` d NOT TO SCALE urvey Plats 190042 Prelim �pG3 no 9 R + + + + t + + + + + + T + + +�,+i + + + + + \ ,g ++i�.i +,+++�+ v + + + \ \ 1 +`+ + \ ++++\�++ ++ nim-rrc�. � 1 I / S01° 24'49"E--- 824.-28' +'++++7++++ + +++++++ ++++++� + - +,�++ ++ +++++++ \ ++. +++++++++ + +�+ +++ ++++++++++++�+++ ++++ (+ + +�+++++++++ +++++++ ++++++� + +-,+-t+++++ +++ - Oo + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +-+� + \ ++�p� +-+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + C + + + + + + + + + \ + \ \ �\ + + + + + + + + + + 4 + + + + + + + + + + -+ + + + + + _+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +-_+ + + + + + + _+ +9 - + +- + +�+ + + + + + + + + ++ + + + + + + + + + + + + - + +-+ + +0 + 0 + + + + + + + + + �r + + + + + + + + + + 1 SF �� . \ - - 19,595SF 21 20,444SF 54 �L. rI �I 5�I ----- 55 19,0491F] I 1 Q ""F: I 1 19 39�SF � 119,779SF �I I Z\ i7 / 1. ZONING AND ASSOCIATED MINIMUM LOT INFORMATION AREAS FOLLOWS: LOT PROPOSED MINIMUM MINIMUM MINIMUM REQUIRED SETBACK NUMBERS ZONING FRONTAGE WIDTH AREA FRONT SIDE REAR ST - ST - ST - ST - ST 0 51 LOT 25 LOT 24 OUTLOT B DETAIL s' S, LOT 9 LOT 8 \ OUTLOT C DETAIL LEGEND: AREA (SF) UTI LITI ES EXISTING COMMUNICATIONS -(C") CED - ELECTRIC - (E) (E) GAS -(G) (r) - SANITARY SEWER - (S) (S) STORM - (ST) (ST) - WATER: DOMESTIC - (W (W) GUY WIRE ANCHOR E -- UTILITY UTILITY POLE 1,309 LIGHT POLE 100% GAS VALVE 29,530 SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE SS STORM SEWER MANHOLE ST HYDRANT U WATER VALVE 221 E. BURLINGTON ST CURB STOP ~ SITE EXISTING CONTOUR - INDEX - 100 - - CONTOUR - INTERMEDIATE "101 FENCE: BARB WIRE - x - x - x - FENCE: CHAIN LINK o FENCE: WIRE - FENCE: WOOD ��❑ ❑ SIGN 0 CONSTRUCTION AREA LIMITS W TREE REMOVAL LIMITS AT EDGE z_ OF CONSERVATION EASEMENT w 001 °� a SENSITIVE AREAS Q a m r4 2 L AREA STEEP SLOPE (18-2S%) z Q w � CRITICAL SLOPE (25-40%) V) IMPACTED CRITICAL SLOPE (2S-40%) PROTECTED SLOPE (> 40%) WOODLAND PRESERVATION ++++++ + + + + + + IMPACTED WOODLAND LOT DIMENSIONS LOT DIMENSION ALONG PROPERTY LINE 45' LOT WIDTH AT SETBACK LINE 60' PROPOSED -M o -EE - ss ss IT IT G- H • O Ak e PROPOSED 100 X01 -x-x-x- �+ =+ =+ r� n�u - BUFFER CODE MIN. = 45' CODE MIN. = 60' 0 N N J � M N o ` U oz V° U O x Q Lu z C7 z Lu Cr) LJ o F- 0 CD 0 v v) Ow J z Q z u Oo > w z " a o Cff U C 0 w Q V 60' RIGHT-OF-WAY rl 26' O 1' 5' 11' 13' 13' 11' 5' 1' CV -j Oi z - g 3 7" PC c U 1.50% > PAVEMENT 1.50% z W y 4.00% a Lp 4.00% f -� 2.50% 2.50% - m f � y O � 4" SIDEWALK U W 0 I- o 6" SUBBASELLJ Lu Lu o 6" SUBDRAIN V U ao u) + + + + + + + + + + N + •+ + + + + +++++++++ p ��� �iI� �a TYPICAL 26' ROADWAY SECTION 1 14U.29 '-► �J���� spa x �p�� o QC 's IMPACTED QUANTITIES: KEY NOTES: S CRITICAL SLOPES WOODLANDS 0 20' DRAINAGE AND STORM SEWER ALL RS -5 45' 60' 8,000 SF 15 5 15 2. THIS PROPERTY LIES WITHIN FEMA PANEL 19103CO215E (2/16/2007). THERE ARE NO MAPPED FLOODPLAINS ON THIS PROPERTY. 3. THERE ARE PROTECTED SLOPES WITHIN THE BOUNDARY OF THE DEVELOPMENT. A BUFFER EQUAL TO 2 TIMES THE HEIGHT OF THE SLOPE IS PROVIDED. 4. THE TOTAL PERCENTAGE IMPACTED CRITICAL SLOPE IS LESS THAN 35% OF THE TOTAL. CRITICAL SLOPE CALCULATION AREA (SF) AREA (ACRES) PERCENTAGE IMPACTED SLOPES 29,530 0.68 12% NON -IMPACTED SLOPES 171,346 3.93 70% NON -IMPACTED SLOPES IN PROTECTED SLOPE BUFFER 45,300 1.04 18% CRITICAL SLOPES (PRIOR TO DEVELOPMENT) 246,176 5.65 100% 5. THERE ARE WOODED AREAS WITHIN THE BOUNDARY OF THE DEVELOPMENT. CONSERVATION EASEMENTS ARE PROPOSED FOR THE PURPOSE OF PRESERVING PORTIONS OF THE WOODED AREAS. PER IOWA CITY CODE, LOCATION AREA (SF) 1 2,026 2 2,277 3 6,287 4 8,612 5 188 6 3,150 7 4,731 8 950 O 1,309 WOODLAND (PRIOR TO DEVELOPMENT) 805,914 18.501 100% TOTAL 29,530 LOCATION AREA (SF) q 1,282 Og 2,417 C 22,085 p 135,469 E 17,353 F 40,552 DC TOTAL 219,158 EASEMENT © 20' DRAINAGE EASEMENT © CONSERVATION EASEMENT HATCHED AREA REPRESENTS AREA INCLUDED IN WOODLAND RETENTION CALCULATION Q MAILBOX CLUSTER. 10x10 OUTLOT WITH (2) 16 -UNIT BOXES. REFER TO OUTLOT B AND OUTLOT C DETAIL 0 15' PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT A MINIMUM OF 50% OF THE EXISTING WOODLANDS MUST BE PRESERVED. ft 0 15 STORM SEWER EASEMENT WOODLAND PRESERVATION CALCULATION AREA (SF) AREA (ACRES) PERCENTAGE 20' < DISTURBED WOODLAND 219,157 5.031 27% 6' 4' 6' BUFFER (50' WIDE) 171,460 3.936 21% DC PRESERVED WOODLAND 415,297 9.534 52% 4.1 4.1 OWNER /APPLICANT: WOODLAND (PRIOR TO DEVELOPMENT) 805,914 18.501 100% TAMARACK DEVELOPMENT, LLC 6. THERE ARE NO STREAM CORRIDORS WITHIN THE BOUNDARY OF THE DEVELOPMENT. SECTION A -A JOE CLARK 7. ALL PROPOSED WATERMAIN TO BE 8". ALL PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER TO BE 8". U LOTS 3/4, 13/14, 221 E. BURLINGTON ST ~ 20/21, 23/24, 31/32 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 NOT TO SCALE :,lljI����► OUTLOT SIZE (SF) INTENDED USE A 493,161 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT & CONSERVATION EASEMENT B 100 MAILBOX CLUSTER. C 100 MAILBOX CLUSTER. ROW 149,389 RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATED TO CITY FOR TAMARACK TRAIL AND BUCKLE DOWN CIRCLE OUTLOTS A, B & C ARE TO BE MAINTAINED AND OWNED BY HOME OWNERS ASSOCIATION. AREAS WITHIN TRAFFIC CIRCLES ARE TO BE MAINTAINED BY HOME OWNERS ASSOCIATION APPLICANT'S ATTORNEY: JOHN BEASLEY 321 E. MARKET ST IOWA CITY, IA 52245 APPROVED BY THE CITY OF IOWA CITY, IOWA CITY CLERK DATE PREPARED BY: AXIOM CONSULTANTS, LLC MICHAEL J. WELCH, PE 60 E. COURT STREET, UNIT 3 IOWA CITY, IOWA 52240 J W < 1 W 0 DC � DC a U, = U a DC Q2a z2 oa0 a wa U W ~ z z a J a W (/) F- a = U co z w w F_ a W G 0 a 0 �- W z O z_ w w 001 °� a S w ` Q a m r4 2 L z Lu I DC W � z Q w � a V) GRADING PLAN TAMARACK RIDGE IOWA CITY, IOWA ■ u rT / I \j 11.z5L A(\ \ 493,161 SF \ m / O r-) \ a � o 1 �- u O i / O I / NOTE: 77 U DC L Q O O N) I 20' DRAINAGE EASEMENT wQ U U WILL BE ESTABLISHED WITH CONSTRUCTION w Q ° N z Lu © CONSERVATION EASEMENT D m w L=L' 0 c HATCHED AREA REPRESENTS AREA INCLUDED c I o LU IN WOODLAND RETENTION CALCULATION o X � I - X X \ X MAILBOX CLUSTER. D U Lu a I \ \ 15' PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT ■ u rT / I \j — 0 (SS) — (SS)— J m / O r-) WW o a � o 1 �- u O i / O I / NOTE: 77 U DC L Q O O N) I 20' DRAINAGE EASEMENT wQ U U WILL BE ESTABLISHED WITH CONSTRUCTION w — 0 (SS) — (SS)— LEGEND: UTI LITI ES COMMUNICATIONS ELECTRIC GAS SANITARY SEWER STORM WATER: DOMESTIC GUY WIRE ANCHOR UTILITY POLE LIGHT POLE GAS VALVE SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE STORM SEWER MANHOLE HYDRANT WATER VALVE CURB STOP SITE CONTOUR - INDEX CONTOUR - INTERMEDIATE FENCE: BARB WIRE FENCE: CHAIN LINK FENCE: WIRE FENCE: WOOD SIGN CONSTRUCTION AREA LIMITS TREE REMOVAL LIMITS SILT FENCE OVERLAND FLOW ROUTE EXISTING EXISTING 100 x x x 0 PROPOSED co - co —E —E G G — SS — SS — ST — ST —W—W 0 O e PROPOSED 100 101 —x —x —x — O N N O Zr -I 0 M D= N O Z U xoz V° U O X a w Lu z Z w V) w (7 Z a U W w O w Z = O �= U CL 7y U Vn Lu 0 KEY NOTES: J m / O r-) WW o a � o 0 u O i / 0 I / NOTE: / _ U DC L Q z G © 20' DRAINAGE EASEMENT wQ U U WILL BE ESTABLISHED WITH CONSTRUCTION w Q ° N z Lu © CONSERVATION EASEMENT D m w L=L' 0 c HATCHED AREA REPRESENTS AREA INCLUDED c I o LU IN WOODLAND RETENTION CALCULATION o X � I - X X I X MAILBOX CLUSTER. D U Lu a I \ \ LEGEND: UTI LITI ES COMMUNICATIONS ELECTRIC GAS SANITARY SEWER STORM WATER: DOMESTIC GUY WIRE ANCHOR UTILITY POLE LIGHT POLE GAS VALVE SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE STORM SEWER MANHOLE HYDRANT WATER VALVE CURB STOP SITE CONTOUR - INDEX CONTOUR - INTERMEDIATE FENCE: BARB WIRE FENCE: CHAIN LINK FENCE: WIRE FENCE: WOOD SIGN CONSTRUCTION AREA LIMITS TREE REMOVAL LIMITS SILT FENCE OVERLAND FLOW ROUTE EXISTING EXISTING 100 x x x 0 PROPOSED co - co —E —E G G — SS — SS — ST — ST —W—W 0 O e PROPOSED 100 101 —x —x —x — O N N O Zr -I 0 M D= N O Z U xoz V° U O X a w Lu z Z w V) w (7 Z a U W w O w Z = O �= U CL 7y U Vn Lu 0 KEY NOTES: J m J WW o a � o 0 u O O 0 20' DRAINAGE AND STORM SEWER EASEMENT NOTE: N U DC a G Q z G © 20' DRAINAGE EASEMENT wQ U U WILL BE ESTABLISHED WITH CONSTRUCTION w Q ° N z Lu © CONSERVATION EASEMENT D m w L=L' 0 c HATCHED AREA REPRESENTS AREA INCLUDED c U o LU IN WOODLAND RETENTION CALCULATION o ui 0 � MAILBOX CLUSTER. D U Lu a N 15' PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT U J Lu J J WW o a � o 0 u O NOTE: Q w DC U DC a G Q z G w Q o_ 0 wQ U U J Lu z`V Q Zo J u O NOTE: �I 1. GRADING SHOWN IS PRELIMINARY. FINAL GRADES z WILL BE ESTABLISHED WITH CONSTRUCTION w Q ° N DRAWINGS. z Q LL z Q F- w L=L' (D= N MINUTES FINAL PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AUGUST 15, 2019 —7:00 PM —FORMAL MEETING E M M A J. HARVAT HALL, CITY HALL MEMBERS PRESENT: Larry Baker, Carolyn Dyer, Mike Hensch, Max Parsons, Mark Signs, Billie Townsend MEMBERS ABSENT: Phoebe Martin STAFF PRESENT: Sara Hektoen, Anne Russett OTHERS PRESENT: Mike Welch, Debra Brandt, Terry Protextor, Kristina Thiel, Michelle Edwards, Scott Rude, Bruce Tarwater, Jan Kardos, Willaim Thiel RECOMMENDATIONS TO CITY COUNCIL: By a vote of 6-0 the Commission recommends approval of SUB19-08 an application submitted by TRD, LLC for a preliminary plat for Tamarack Ridge subdivision, a 36.81 acre, 60 -lot residential subdivision with one outlot located south of Scott Boulevard and north of Tamarack Trail. CALL TO ORDER: Hensch called the meeting to order at 7:00 PM. PUBLIC DISCUSSION OF ANY ITEM NOT ON THE AGENDA: None. CASE NOS. ZCA19-03 and REZ19-07: Applicant: Capstone Collegiate Communities, LLC Location: 305 and 315 E. Prentiss Street and 625 S. Gilbert Street a. An application submitted by Capstone Collegiate Communities, LLC for an amendment to the Riverfront Crossings regulating plan to include the property located at 625 S. Gilbert Street in the Central Crossing Subdistrict. (ZCA19-03) b. An application submitted by Capstone Collegiate Communities, LLC for a rezoning of approximately 1.6 acres of property located at 305 and 315 E. Prentiss Street and 625 S. Gilbert Street from Community Commercial (CC -2) and Intensive Commercial (CI -1) to Riverfront Crossings -Central Crossings (RFC -CC). (REZ19-07) Russett noted staff received a request from the applicant to defer both agenda items 4a and 4b to the September 5 meeting and staff is recommending the Commission make a motion to defer. Dyer moves to defer items 4a and 4b to the September 5, 2019 meeting. Parsons seconded the motion. A vote was taken and the motion passed 6-0. Planning and Zoning Commission August 15, 2019 Page 2 of 14 CASE NO. SUB19-08: Applicant: TRD, LLC Location: South of Scott Boulevard and north of Tamarack Trail An application submitted by TRD, LLC for a preliminary plat for Tamarack Ridge subdivision, a 36.81 acre, 60 -lot residential subdivision with one outlot located south of Scott Boulevard and north of Tamarack Trail. Russett noted this is an application for a preliminary plat and showed a map of the proposed plat, it is located south of Scott Boulevard and north of Tamarack Trail. Regarding the application background, in addition to the application for a preliminary plat, the applicant has requested a rezoning from Interim Development Single Family to Low -Density Single Family. The Commission considered that rezoning at their last meeting and recommended approval subject to two conditions, the first substantial compliance with the preliminary plat, particularly the incorporation of the traffic circles and the planting of trees in the right-of-way. Additionally the applicant has held a good neighbor meeting for both the rezoning and the preliminary plat on June 10. In terms of compliance with the Comprehensive Plan, the land use map identifies this area as appropriate for conservation design due to the environmentally sensitive areas. The Northeast District Plan identifies this area as appropriate for single-family residential and also identifies that higher density uses could be more appropriate close to Scott Boulevard. Lastly, Russett noted the Comprehensive Plan does have goals of achieving an interconnected street network, which this plat is accomplishing through the extension of Tamarack Trail. Russett showed the preliminary plat and sensitive areas development plan. The applicant is proposing 60 single family lots and an extension of Tamarack Trail north to Scott Boulevard. There will be no street connections to the east or west due to development constraints and sensitive areas. Due to the long block length that has been created by Tamarack Trail, staff has concerns with travel speed. Therefore the plat incorporates two traffic circles and a pavement width of 26 feet, which allows parking on one side of the street. The traffic circles and the reduced pavement width will help with traffic calming. In terms of traffic implications, Russett said staff has estimated the total trips generated by the 60 lots to be around 571 trips per day to and from the development and staff estimates the extension of Tamarack Trail and the additional access point will reduce total trips accessing North 1st Avenue. Scott Boulevard and 1st Avenue are both arterial streets and have the capacity to handle the additional traffic generated by the proposed development. Staff is aware there are congestion issues during peak hours at the intersection of 1 st Avenue and Scott Boulevard and the City has a program planned for 2020 to address those congestion issues. Russett noted there are environmentally sensitive areas on the site, there are critical and protected slopes. The proposed development would disturb 12% of the critical slopes and the Code allows up to 35%. No protected slopes will be impacted by the proposed development. Russett added there are also woodlands on the site, around 18.5 acres, and the development would preserve 52% of those woodlands, and the retention requirement for the Code is 50%. The plat does identify a conservation easement over both the persevered woodland areas and the woodland buffer. In terms of archeological resources, Russett stated it was listed as a deficiency in the staff report, but since the publication of the staff report the applicant has provided the Phase 1 Study which was completed by the Office of the State Archeologist and the OAS concluded that no further archeological work is recommended. Therefore this is no longer a deficiency. In terms of public open space, it is addressed at final platting, dedication Planning and Zoning Commission August 15, 2019 Page 3 of 14 requirement of around 0.79 acres or a payment of an in -lieu fee would be required and based on the proximity of another park an in -lieu fee would be appropriate. Russett next discussed the stormwater management stating the preliminary plat identifies three stormwater management basins. Public Works staff has approved the preliminary grading plan and the preliminary stormwater calculations. Stormwater management was originally listed as a deficiency in the staff report because Public Works staff identified some developed areas where runoff would not be captured by the stormwater management basin. The applicant's consultant has provided some additional information to the Public Works staff, which has been reviewed and accepted, and the Public Works staff will work through the additional stormwater management details during the review of the construction drawings which will happen at final platting. Regarding neighborhood correspondence, Russett noted staff has received some correspondence from residents in the area with concerns expressed regarding the preliminary plat. The Commission has been given copies of all the correspondence but to summarize the concerns are related to traffic, the extension of Tamarack Trail and stormwater management. Russett noted the role of the Commission in the review of the preliminary plat is for the Commission to determine whether or not the plat complies with the subdivision regulations and other applicable Codes and whether or not it complies with the Comprehensive Plan. Next steps will be a public hearing and first reading held by City Council next Tuesday for the rezoning, pending recommendation of approval regarding the preliminary plat that will also move onto Council. Pending City Council approval of the preliminary plat and the proposed rezoning, the applicant could submit an application for a final plat. Staff recommends approval of SUB19-08 an application submitted by TRD, LLC for a preliminary plat for Tamarack Ridge subdivision, a 36.81 acre, 60 -lot residential subdivision with one outlot located south of Scott Boulevard and north of Tamarack Trail. Baker asked about the traffic estimates of 60 units producing 571 trips per day, which would be about 10 trips per household per day, and that seems high to him. Russett said those figures came from the Transportation Planner who uses a trip generation manual to determine the approximate trips per day based on the use. Hensch noted in the staff report there were two different deficiencies listed, one the archeological study and the other the stormwater management calculations and asked for confirmation that both those items have been resolved. Russett assured the Commission that both those items have been resolved to staff satisfaction. Dyer asked if the stormwater management basins shown on the map modified from earlier versions. Russett stated those have not changed, what is shown on the preliminary plat now is the most recent version and have not changed, there were modifications through the review process. Hensch opened the public hearing. Mike Welch (Axiom Consultants) is representing the applicant and was the one to prepare the plans and the preliminary plat. He acknowledged staff did a nice job summarizing plat but he would like to talk about the changes they did make with the stormwater management. The Planning and Zoning Commission August 15, 2019 Page 4 of 14 applicants worked with staff to do more analysis than required by Code to discover where the runoff was being generated, where it was going and how it was impacting the existing development to the south. They did then modify the basin outlets to hold back more water. They began by looking at the area today, before any development, and determined the run-off was going and were able to make modifications to their plans to help with the current issues. The water that flows to the southeast, to the existing development, will be reduced with the new development and the stormwater basins because it will reduce the run-off rates. This reduction in run-off can be seen in 5, 10 and 100 year storm scenarios. With the new development and the grading plan the stormwater flow to the south will be reduced from what it is currently. Welch also stated they had a meeting a couple weeks ago with a few of the neighbors and City engineering staff and went through some of the stormwater concerns. Baker asked Welch to clarify the time process of getting the 60 units built. Welch said he cannot say how long it will be for the development of each house, for the development itself if things go according to schedule they would do utility work this winter, paving in the spring, and then the developer could sell lots. Baker noted one of the concerns raised by the neighbors was construction traffic, is it possible even if the road is in place to have it blocked off so all of the construction traffic would have to come from Scott Boulevard. Welch said all the construction traffic before the road is constructed will have to come from Scott Boulevard, but once the road is complete and the City accepts the road, it would be up to Public Works if they would be able to or willing to block off access through Tamarack Trail. As the developer they have no ability to keep the road closed. Baker asked if they would have any objection to having it closed during the construction process, Welch stated he personally would not. Debra Brandt (973 Tamarack Trail) stated she is a researcher so when staff mentioned a study the City had based some of their decisions on her first indication was to do to Google Scholar and find the study. Brandt showed the Commission the article Russett sent her that the City is using to base their decision to put trees on the parkway, the $45,000 worth of trees. On the left hand side of the article it states "this pilot" and as a researcher Brandt said this is a pilot study and a pilot study is used to see if there is something to look at, if a study is feasible, how much the study may cost, and how many participants are needed to do a real study of the question. Brandt showed the conclusion of the pilot study was they did not have any conclusions, but they should study it more, the study was done on a simulator, not on a real street, and the simulator had an entire canopy of trees. Brandt found a study, but it was really a literature review, which is where someone looks at all the articles that have been written, and what was found is the canopy, while it initially reduced speed by one mile per hour, it actually became a risk. Brandt showed an image of Brown Street as an example of trees along the streets, and asked how many grandchildren they see on the image, in the next slide she showed there are three kids in the image, hidden behind each tree. She stated that by narrowing the street and putting trees out there and that means the driver has less time to react to children darting out. Brandt also noted there are studies that look at these canopies and found it actually changes the environment under them. Concrete is destabilized and it may actually deteriorate the road more quickly. By obligating the use of these trees the City is providing false reassurance to the neighborhood and increasing costs to the future homeowners. Her concern is if the City is basing this decision on evidence that is poorly collected, what other decisions are being based on speculation rather than evidence. Brandt showed from the City's own information regarding Planning and Zoning Commission August 15, 2019 Page 5 of 14 zoning it states "one cannot grow trees where they become an impedance to sight or traffic" and here the City is putting those out there knowing there are risks but doing it anyway. Brandt asked what else could be done to make these streets safe. She showed an article about cul-de- sacs and the benefits of cul-de-sacs of which the most important one is they are safe, one cannot drive as fast on a cul-de-sac, they also promote neighborhoods, they promote reduced costs, they are beneficial to neighborhoods. Brandt noted if one were to ask any realtor in Iowa City if they had a house on a cul-de-sac to sell versus a through -street they will take the cul-de- sac. Knowing that, Brandt reviewed Iowa City to look at the evidence, she pulled crash data from July and no crashes occurred on a cul-de-sac — all on through -streets. With regards to crash related to speed, same information, none on cul-de-sacs. Next she pulled crime data, again no crimes were on cul-de-sacs. She did a search of pedestrians hit by cars, none happened on a cul-de-sac. Therefore Brandt would encourage this Commission to reconsider the plans. This should be a combined effort between the developer, the City and the residents. She does not oppose the development of this area, but there is a large neighborhood concern about traffic. Terry Protextor (1007 Tamarack Trail) noted he sent an email to the Commission so would not reiterate those points. He has spent a lot of time in the past two weeks exploring all the City Codes pertaining to street access, meeting requirements, Commission and City staff process and after looking at all this he developed a concern about where the citizen fits into this process. There are really four parties that have standing, the developer, City staff, the Commission and City Council. Clearly the citizens have no standing, other than five minutes to speak at a public hearing, so it is difficult for him to understand how 75 tax paying citizens (who all signed a petition) have no standing other than this presentation this evening. When decisions are being made about their neighborhood, their street, their safety, their children and their physical environment as far as the tranquility of where they live, citizens should be able to sit down with City staff and the developer and have discussions to try to come up with what is a reasonable and fair solution for all parties. Protextor questions why the City Code or City staff doesn't have any process to do that. It feels like no one wants to hear from the citizens. Protextor stated the citizens feel they have a reasonable solution to this, even the City Code pertaining to streets and circulation states "use of cul-de-sacs and other roadways within a point of access should be avoided" but the key word is "should", and one does not have to be a lawyer to understand that is not an absolute term. Using the word should allow for flexibility on the part of City staff and the Commission to come up with a reasonable solution for this problem and winners on all sides of the issue. Protextor mentioned at an earlier meeting, the Peninsula neighborhood, which was developed by the City, not by a development group, and the City chose to ignore all the coding rules and created the Peninsula with a single access point. Apparently since the city was developing the project the Code went by the wayside. Protextor asks that the Planning and Zoning Commission postpone the decision tonight and request the City staff, the developer and the neighborhood concerned citizen group meet and sit down and work out a fair and appropriate response on how they can prevent the traffic issues and come up with a better solution. Protextor acknowledged the Commission is to represent the citizens just as the City Council does and asks that they do so. Planning and Zoning Commission August 15, 2019 Page 6 of 14 Kristina Thiel (2755 Hickory Trail) Dr. Thiel and her husband William just closed on a house on Hickory Trail on June 19. Therefore they weren't property owners in this subdivision for the June 10 good neighbor meeting. They were also not aware of a subdivision being planned that would significantly increase the traffic flow on Hickory Trail prior to them closing on this house. She has lived in Iowa City for 12 and her husband for 14 years, they have chosen to stay here and build their careers here, have children here and raise their families here. They chose this neighborhood because it had a single access point, it was a quiet street, and it was a safe neighborhood. As Deb Brandt pointed out (she and Brandt are actually colleagues at the University of Iowa Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology) she compels the Commission to please consider the extra traffic on Hickory Trail, things can be unpredictable and an increased traffic flow of 571 cars per day is more than 60% increase in the current traffic flow now. This is not the kind of neighborhood she and her husband wanted to move into. She is in agreement with a development, it will likely increase all their property values, but they need to make sure the existing neighborhood is not impeded and their children can be safe. Additionally there are the other issues of water run-off, her house abuts the creek that runs behind and they already have drainage and water issues and are concerned how that will increase. Therefore she compels the Commission to think about how they will be affecting their current taxpayer in Iowa City (they could have easily bought in Coralville). Michelle Edwards (2745 Hickory Trail) is Thiel's next door neighbor and wants to speak also about the traffic. She feels the Commission needs to come to Hickory Trail to see what it would mean to have an extra 571 trips on that street. It will adversely affect the neighborhood. She cannot speak to the water drainage, she can only have faith in engineers for that, but she does not need an engineer to tell her how this traffic will impact her street, what she needs is for you people to understand and to come see their street and how it will change. Edwards cannot believe that the best interest for the City of Iowa City in increasing development would be to take a peaceful existing neighborhood and make it a city neighborhood with city traffic and that is what they will be doing. She agrees they all need to stop a moment and take some time and look at what they will be doing. They would not be people coming on summer evenings to repeatedly plead their cases if this wasn't important to them. It is important to them because their neighborhood is a place of peacefulness right now, it is quiet, kids feel safe, and that is all about to change and there isn't anyone up and down Hickory Trail and up and down Tamarack Trail that doesn't know that. The only people that don't seem to know that are the people sitting here and making these decisions. She implores them to take some time, visit the neighborhood and see how it will all change. Scott Rude (1035 Tamarack Trail) wants to concur with previous speakers and asks the Commission to take in to consideration the 75 people who have signed the petition and asks how many more do they need to see, they can get them. The neighborhood wants to slow this process down because they have great solutions, they can make it a great development, but they need the help to do that. Planning and Zoning Commission August 15, 2019 Page 7 of 14 Bruce Tarwater (2669 Hickory Trail) also concurs with everything that has been said by his neighbors and implores the Commission to take into consideration the concerns raised today. Baker asked Protextor about the two concerns, one being the stormwater run-off which will be handled by people smarter than they, but the other is if Tamarack Trail is extended it will increase the traffic flow on Tamarack and Hickory Trails and it is the position of the citizens that the increased traffic is inherently dangerous. Protextor said from his standpoint yes for two reasons, one even though the developer along with engineers have tried to do their best by using roundabout circles that may slow it a little bit but by the time someone gets to his end of Tamarack Trail and around their little cul-de-sac circle it is a straight shot down to Hickory and then full speed on Hickory. The other thing, that hasn't been mentioned, is when one drives down Tamarack Trail and turn right onto Hickory, it is a sharp turn and the mailbox for the house on the end has been knocked down four or five times just because people weren't slowing down to turn, or a snow plow didn't make the corner. So that is a concern. Baker stated the only way to mitigate that concern is to not have Tamarack Trail extended. Proxtextor agrees and notes they have suggested keeping their current cul-de-sac and have another cul-de-sac abutting it on the new development side and have sidewalks connected so everyone can have access but not through traffic. Baker asked if Tamarack Trail were extended there is no speed reducing mechanism that would help. Protextor doesn't, and is concerned that speed bumps and circles don't slow people down enough to protect the children. Baker said then the sitting down with the citizens, developer and the City will lead to an either or situation, either the Tamarack Trail is extended or it is not, there is no other alternative being suggested. Protextor confirmed that was correct. Baker asked if there were any comparable streets in Iowa City of length and traffic flow. Protextor said the Peninsula was a classic example of people making poor decisions and having one access route. Baker asked if that example also includes the same data on accidents, injuries, etc. Protextor does not know the answer to that question, all he knows is what Brandt was suggesting which is cul-de-sacs don't produce issues like through -streets. Protextor looked at the east side of Iowa City and there are cul-de-sacs all over the place, he stopped circling them on the map at eight. His subdivision has been there for over 30 years, if they felt there had been a problem with a cul-de-sac they would have been the first to say something. Baker said if there were a comparable street somewhere in Iowa City in length and traffic flow that does not seem to have the accident and injury problems you seem to think will happen, would that make a difference. Protextor said they have the research that shows it doesn't happen on cul-de-sacs, it happens on through -streets and they will become a busy through -street if this goes development goes though as proposed. They point they are trying to make is if they can all come together and look at facts. Baker noted the facts will lead to assumptions. Baker noted he lives on the east side of Iowa City, and he is looking for comparable examples of traffic flow and neighborhoods and the first that comes to his mind is Friendship Street which has higher traffic flows than what is anticipated on this development extension and doesn't seem to have a problem with injuries or accidents from the length of road or intensity of traffic. Baker understands the concerns of the residents of Tamarack Trail and Hickory Trail but there are examples of similar neighborhoods in Iowa City without those concerns. Protextor suggests they give them all time to look at Friendship or other streets and see if the concerns they have for their neighborhood are warranted. Baker said they could sit down and study but they already know the extension will increase the number of cars on their street, but the question from that is Planning and Zoning Commission August 15, 2019 Page 8 of 14 if one can assume danger based on increase traffic because it is not shown elsewhere. Decisions are made based on experiences of other neighborhoods. Jan Kardos (956 Tamarack Trail) has two quick points, one is everyone on the Commission needs to come see their neighborhood, taking from the new subdivision down Tamarack is downhill and comes to a steep turn and that is where accidents happen and while she doesn't agree there will be 571 new trips per day, even half that number would make it more dangerous. Debra Brandt (973 Tamarack Trail) noted that when it is said research leads to assumptions as a researcher she takes great offense to that, research leads to conclusions which is much different than assumptions. With regards to Friendship Street, she grew up in that neighborhood and she noted Friendship Street just put in speed bumps because it was a dangerous area, there was enough concern by those neighbors, who by the way all would say they prefer a cul-de-sac. Baker acknowledged everyone would prefer a cul-de-sac, which is not feasible. Baker wants to know what the distinction is between the increased traffic and increased speed because is the danger increased traffic or increased speed. Brandt said if you have more attempts then you probably increase your probability of a hit. But her point is this shouldn't be her research study, this should be the City's research study, the onus of burden shouldn't be on the citizens, this is why the Commission was appointed, to take data and come to conclusions. Baker said then they need to find a comparable street and study the traffic and accident rate. Brandt asked isn't that was City Engineering is supposed to do. Signs confirmed that is who they rely on for their data and information and they use nationally recognized methods. Brandt asked if those statistics are released anywhere for citizens to see. Signs said the comments and details are in the staff report. Brandt also noted that when doing research and looking at studies is if they can be generalized to our area, it is the problem with the pilot study where they based the decision on for $45,000 worth of trees, it was taken out of context, when doing research one must look at the results and look at who they are applying them to. Michelle Edwards (2745 Hickory Trail) appreciates the attention the Commission is giving to Brandt and Protextor's research on this subject, but what she cares about is the feeling in the neighborhood and what it is like on their street and that is the concern for a lot of people. Even since the creation of Tamarack Trail there has been a lot more traffic on the street, kids going down the hill fast, it's hard not to go down that hill fast, and Hickory Trail is a straight shot. They do have a petition now about the speed on that street, so increasing the number of cars it is just logical they will increase the number of cars driving fast on that street. Whether it increase accidents or not, she can't speak to that, but she can say it will change what the street is like for the people who live there. Adding 60 houses, 571 new trips going right past her house everyday will change the complexion and feeling of the neighborhood. Kristina Thiel (2755 Hickory Trail) showed a study published in 1995 in the International Journal of Epidemiology "A case control study of traffic risk factors and child pedestrian injury" noting the data is over 25 years old. She read the abstract: Background: Pedestrian injuries in children constitute an important cause of mortality and morbidity. Specific hazards which contribute to these injuries need to be identified to enable the development of preventive strategies. Methods: A population -based case -control study was conducted in which 40 aspects of Planning and Zoning Commission August 15, 2019 Page 9 of 14 traffic and road environment that contribute to the likelihood of childhood pedestrian injury were examined. The factors of interest were measured at 100 places of injury and 200 control sites between December 1991 and December 1993. Results: The volume of traffic (odds ratio [OR] = 2.16 for an increase of 100 vehicles per hour) in combination with the proportion of vehicles exceeding the speed limit (OR = 1.04) for each 1 % increase in average speed, and the presence of footpaths (OR = 11.0) were associated with significant increase in the risk of injury. A graded inverse relationship was present between socioeconomic status and the odds of pedestrian injury. Conclusions: These findings have obvious implications for public health as features of the physical environment are potentially modifiable. Baker said he really is trying to work this out, he is looking at other neighborhoods, other comparable experiences and he doesn't see how the increase in traffic on Tamarack is going to be more dangerous than a situation that already exists in Iowa City in other comparable neighborhoods. He acknowledged increase traffic is one problem, it does affect the ambiance of a neighborhood, but it is when does the increase in traffic become dangerous and increased danger probably comes from increase in speed. Thiel noted in this study the odds ratio for increase in speed was 1.04 which means there was only a 4% increase in incidents whereas the volume had increase odds ratio of 2.16 as an increase of 100 vehicles per hour. Baker asks where does this show up in Iowa City. Thiel said this is data across the country, Iowa City is a representative sampling of data across the country. City Planners should take knowledge from other cities and apply that knowledge to their city. Bruce Tarwater (2669 Hickory Trail) asked Russett about increased traffic safety that was mentioned in her presentation. Russett said they had the transportation planner look at the traffic that would be generated from the new development and based on trip generation manuals he had estimated 571 more trips per day from the new development. But he also estimated with the additional access along Scott Boulevard trips could be diverted and traffic that accesses 1st Avenue could be reduced. Terry Protextor (1007 Tamarack Trail) noted the averting traffic to 1st Avenue is not helpful, they are already backed up. He also noted that if the citizens cannot ask questions why they don't have standing. Where are their rights, the City Codes are not cast in stone, they were written to protect the citizens but in this case are they really protecting the citizens or really preventing the citizens from having a say. William Thiel (2755 Hickory Trail) stated a concern regarding traffic is off Hickory Trail is 151 Avenue and 1 st Avenue is a lot of traffic off the highway, the main thoroughfare to get to a lot of schools. To make a left turn off Hickory Trail onto 1st Avenue is hard and must be done quickly. His concern is having more traffic coming down Hickory Trail and increased left hand turns onto 1st Avenue. After a quick search he found 61% of all accidents typically involve a left-hand turn, so it is logical that if there are more left hand turns, there will be more accidents. If the new development is kept as a separate subdivision those cars would be forced to take Scott Boulevard which is actually a fairly empty road because there are not any other roads that dump out onto Scott Boulevard. He wonders if it was taken into consideration the increase number of left hand turns from Hickory Trail onto 1 st Avenue by the traffic planners. Russet said they do not have specific counts on that they just have estimates. Hensch closed the public hearing. Planning and Zoning Commission August 15, 2019 Page 10 of 14 Parsons moved to recommend approval of SUB19-08 an application submitted by TRD, LLC for a preliminary plat for Tamarack Ridge subdivision, a 36.81 acre, 60 -lot residential subdivision with one outlot located south of Scott Boulevard and north of Tamarack Trail. Townsend seconded the motion. Hesnch stated he has not only driven through the neighborhood, he has gotten out and walked around twice. He does this for every case that comes before the Commission. As far as citizen standing, this Commission is very strong and vocal advocates for good neighbor meetings and of course any citizen can schedule a meeting with City staff anytime they want to. Regarding the postponement issues, there are City Codes that state within 45 days of a completed application submitted if it is not acted upon it is assumed by default to be approved by the City Planning & Zoning Commission and goes directly to City Council so that is why the Commission cannot just on their own postpone things, there are rules they have to follow. Hensch also stated as a former police officer and state trooper and 15 years as a medical examiner he does know a lot about accidents and death investigations so it is very difficult when one tries to cherry pick information and try to draw conclusions from that. Hektoen also noted regarding standing the State Code allows property owners within 200 feet of property being rezoned to file a protest with City Council and that will trigger a super majority requirement. The same rights don't apply to plat approvals. Hensch also stated the Commission has a defined role, they do like public input, and they are here as unpaid public members to represent the public to make sure the views are looked at. However their role is to look at if this subdivision complies with the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance, does it comply with the Comprehensive Plan, and does it comply with State Law. That is the fundamental responsibility of the Commission and the public helps them look at the examination. Signs wants to talk about process and was offended by accusations from the public that the Commission is not paying attention to the public. In Iowa City, the public involvement process in everything they do is extensive. The Comprehensive Plan is reviewed every 10 years, the neighborhood plans are reviewed, traffic studies are updated, projects come before this Commission twice a month, he has been on this commission for three years and hasn't seen anyone in the audience here prior to this application. That is because it didn't matter what else was going on, it only matters when it is in your backyard, and it is very frustrating to have people come with that approach. The truth is nothing would ever get done because everyone doesn't want something in their backyard, the process is there to set what can happen in your backyards. There are many times the Commission votes based on what is said during public comments when it is evident that it changes the information. The Commission relies on City staff for data and information, who are trained professionals, who use industry proven methods to evaluate applications. Signs noted there is a study that can be found for everything, he spent 10 years in the tree business and knows the person that wrote that study and he believes from his years of experience in the tree business it has been proven that trees and landscape plantings do slow down traffic in an environment. Do they add a safety issue with children hiding behind trees, possibility so, but they do take all this seriously. They do take public comment seriously and then they must take those comments and go back to the Code and Comprehensive Plan and Neighborhood Plans (that the citizens of Iowa City developed) and make decisions based on all Planning and Zoning Commission August 15, 2019 Page 11 of 14 that information, not just bits and pieces. Parsons noted it states in the Comprehensive Plan they do not want more cul-de-sacs in the City and he just doesn't see this as a unique enough circumstance to warrant a cul-de-sac. They have had plenty of discussions as a Commission that they want to see interconnected neighborhoods across the City and while you can construct trails and such having two cul-de- sacs with back to back houses facing each other doesn't accomplish that goal. He cannot also ignore the fact that the street is stubbed at both ends from the beginning which means the door is open not only to the extension to the north but to the southeast as well. When looking at this map it is a better use of City resources and planning that the road be connected. Dyer noted that over time in any city you can see the standards for development change as lots of things change. There are a lot of cul-de-sacs in Iowa City and while they may create safe neighborhoods they also isolate people from each other and make it difficult for people to get around. People who would live in lots 1 and 60 would probably just as likely want to go down Tamarack Trail as the people who live on the other side of that development. Artificially preventing them from making that trip doesn't seem to be an appropriate thing to do when it is possible for the street to go through. She has been on this Commission for seven or eight years and many times when a new subdivision is proposed a big group of people come and say "not on our street, the traffic will be too heavy" and they have not witnessed major increases in accidents in those neighborhoods. Dyer thinks the plan is a good plan, she has a friend that lives on Tamarack Trail, she has visited there quite often, she is quite familiar with that street and she is not convinced the fears of people warrant changing this plan. Baker thanked everyone for their input, he noted the reason he got into politics and city government 30 years ago was because of comparable issues, he got angry and then got involved. He understands the neighborhoods frustration, but he is trying to break this down into the greatest public good, and yes traffic will increase if Tamarack is extended. There is a risk involved, but there is a risk involved in any development in Iowa City which leads to higher traffic. His concern is the safety involved and how to mitigate the danger of the extension. He likes trees, but he doesn't have a lot of faith in trees slowing down cars, nor does he think trees put children in greater danger, children are in danger all the time, stepping in between parked cars. His concern is if this is extended how they mitigate the impact on the neighborhoods. The circles are a good start. Mr. Teal raised a good point about the 1St Avenue and Hickory Trail intersection, the City is doing traffic studies on 1St Avenue and Scott Boulevard but they know traffic will also increase at 1 It Avenue and Hickory Trail, so something should be done at that intersection as well. Baker does make a distinction between increased risk and danger, everything they do in Iowa City that increases the population and increases the traffic increases the risk of living in an area. He looks at comparable neighborhoods and how they have adjusted and he doesn't see the statistics that show them to be any more dangerous than they were in the past. He admits he would be in the audience tonight with them if he lived on their street, but sitting on the Commission and looking at the facts he does not see a compelling reason to deny the application. Townsend acknowledged change is difficult for everyone, she also has been in Iowa City for 30 years and has watched Iowa City grow from a small community to a pretty large metropolitan area and we all have watched it change. Sometimes for the best, sometimes not for the best. But to deprive 60 families from being able to go through their neighborhood and out more than one exit we are asking a lot of those new families. She thought Iowa City was a place where Planning and Zoning Commission August 15, 2019 Page 12 of 14 people opened their arms and hearts to new people coming in and she is hoping we can do more of that. A vote was taken and the motion passed 6-0. CONSIDERATION OF MEETING MINUTES: JULY 18. 2019 Townsend moved to approve the meeting minutes of July 18, 2019. Signs seconded. A vote was taken and the motion passed 6-0. �W_\►1 111, ley -Al kiIIWOI,IIki"1411;[*]NLTA I_rduo] kiF Russett gave a few updates. First she introduced Jade Peterson in the audience, Jade is the planning intern, an undergrad getting her degree in environmental planning and policy. At the last meeting Commissioner Baker had a question regarding the noise at the Kum & Go on 1St Avenue and Muscatine Avenue. Russett passed that along to a colleague who went out and investigated and did issue a violation because the noise from the speakers was too loud. Russett noted several months ago the City Council recommended approval of a rezoning at 12 East Court (the Pentacrest Garden apartments) and that is now going through the design review process, it will come before the Commission per the condition of the rezoning that the Commission must approve the elevations. The text amendment regarding the separation distance between fuel pumps and residential zones was approved by Council, as were the two local landmark zonings on North Gilbert Street across from Mercy Hospital. Regarding the Forest View development, there has been a request from the applicant to change what they are requesting in terms of their economic development incentives (Tax Increment Financing) from what was originally proposed. They have come back to the City and are requesting some additional funds to change the size of the single-family homes. This is something the Council is looking at since it is related to TIF. Townsend asked if that would delay the whole progress on that subdivision. Parsons said it may, he read a report from City Manager Fruin where he said it would take months to put the TIF together. Russett discussed the Planning & Zoning Commission and City Council joint consult meeting discussing the land development process. The City Council continued that discussion a couple weeks ago and have directed staff to look into threshold projects. Dyer asked to find out how much affordable housing has been located in the Riverfront Crossings District as opposed to other areas of the City. Russett said they will look into it. Planning and Zoning Commission August 15, 2019 Page 13 of 14 Baker asked how to get it so no music would be allowed at gas stations. Russett said there would need to be a Code Amendment. Adjournment: Parsons moved to adjourn. Townsend seconded. A vote was taken and the motion passed 6-0. PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION ATTENDANCE RECORD 2018-2019 KEY: X = Present O = Absent O/E = Absent/Excused --- = Not a Member 3/15 (W.S.) 4/2 4/5 (W.S) 4/16 4/19 5/3 5/17 6/7 6/21 7/5 8/16 9/6 9/20 10/18 12/20 1/3 BAKER, LARRY -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- X X X X O/E X X DYER, CAROLYN O/E X O/E X X X X X O/E X O O/E O X X X FREERKS, ANN X X X X X O/E X X X -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- HENSCH, MIKE O/E X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X MARTIN, PHOEBE X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X O/E PARSONS, MAX X X X X X X X X X X X O/E X X X X SIGNS, MARK X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X THEOBALD, JODIE X X X X X X X X O/E -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- TOWNSEND, BILLIE -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- X X X X X O/E X KEY: X = Present O = Absent O/E = Absent/Excused --- = Not a Member 1/17 (W.S.) 2/4 2/21 3/7 3/21 4/4 4/18 5/16 6/6 6/20 7/18 8/15 BAKER, LARRY X X X X X X X O/E X X X X DYER, CAROLYN O/E X X X X X X O/E X X X X FREERKS, ANN -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- HENSCH, MIKE X X X X O/E X X X X O/E X X MARTIN, PHOEBE X O/E X X X O/E X X X X O/E O/E PARSONS, MAX X X X X X X X X X X X X SIGNS, MARK X X X X X O/E X X X X O/E X THEOBALD, JODIE -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- TOWNSEND, BILLIE X X X O/E X X X X X X X X KEY: X = Present O = Absent O/E = Absent/Excused --- = Not a Member STAFF PRESENTATION TO FOLLOW: =11 i � 1 fir, CITY OF IOWA CITY 410 East Washington Street Iowa City, Iowa S2240-1826 (3 19) 356-5000 (319) 356-5009 FAX www.icgov.org Item 10.b.: Tamarack Ridge Preliminary Plat and Sensitive Areas Development Plan SU B19-08 A resolution approving the Preliminary Plat and Sensitive Areas Development Plan of Tamarack Ridge Subdivision, Iowa City, Iowa. PRELIMINARY PLAT & SENSITIVE AREAS DEVELOPMENT PLAN TAMARACK RIDGE IOWA CIN, IOWA - ..�wndKdrumewr MEJ{hE%y j rrawad wvmas NAA'y� pTF�E . )• ruvf mean IIiX p$EA>< - rondeesr� �II6L� 35 36 37 38 39s 4� .42 43 m :, I r ` 34 433 4.32i'i,—'90 II I E a I arm w.nF � WwwwMFl � : •:i: + '.N1N V I `i :.•i: NM 1A awvEa ' so ]T +Y „ V � d1TIr I pgrpd0. NM 1A awvEa ni6Tr Mdl6 d1TIr I pgrpd0. I Ogl IM tl.a lffd YY]f' W'tlffY a.L Iwe uu raaa ufua wwm u am rw•au•e n am srw uw PROJECT VICINITY MAP -CITY OF IOWA CITY x.wus lar d..Ia 1M}.1. aaMOlowwnunnwsdmfrdrmmurnrmee5dwwne wamwn ouvv dw{ INaeoNlMHrdfVerG fw{I p ae�lW t f WrprV nrprX, IrWI a yUr, tly.OM1 mxrr�lr@MM1. NY. dfOdlOtl: �urwww a rxr w.erxwl mxad wu aurora r.Ner mann. mlru vrwww. mm rnr wave rrafdmwdn wrwr n wa. uwr d fmn tlwWMo ro M,oerr ..uwr... neFumxwf. f.mmrtn vaFa lwr.aff♦. famrnrmrn wuruanwrmmuaon mforore news fmYrwn udcvwwurrr aaanro Ixr fwneu+mwu or vu xuxf.: rraFu wau Iw wnx w u fwu.lwua v,vffw, aauf wn, nae frm♦,-w. rfn rm: menu wruww, nnnrrn: nary Faf-w wt. ffad nn:rwaf xa-affY.,m ra ne foarxauxd w.+aw dfmtrouwrR dfen avnrm waw vwfonx uwar•sfimrmeaFWwowN rx Iullwal4rrNa r-u'an..vnr«rf veru wawfwofunx of rlaPwtll. Wm,al roMrdar d adwwr.. IxusruwuoarwA afr.Kwaweswlry roemarwn,sorraaafrrnmd atm. r 47 .?•53 NOTES: . mNwFxuwmwrmwwraw rd waaw.rFw.a of rauuwf. 54 58 :., :•:. r':::. as [ 1•.,.' �1 a I I 3 I 1 y -2 • Na F - rtt i 160 J. 40 54 58 I I 3 I 1 y -2 • Na F - rtt i 40 uwf+uFrrrt ♦ I$ ••; „�N`Ye"��T y••L14019;• 'was 41E M71� E6t mu IMPACTED QUANTITES: KEY NI Conditions Placed at Rezoning Applicant requested a rezoning from ID - RS to RS -5 subject to the following conditions: Traffic calming measures, like the traffic circles, are incorporated into the � final design of the extension of � Tamarack Trail. Planting of approved number and species of trees within the public right- of-way prior to the issuance of certificate of occupancy Conformance with the Comprehensive Plan Streets and Circulation Sidewalks, Trails, and Pedestrian Connections Layout of Blocks and Lots Open Space Utilities Compliance with the Comprehensive Plan COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: CONSERVATION DESIGN \4L W, NORTHEAST DISTRICT PLAN: SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL Staff estimates the total trips generated by the 60 new lots would be around 571 trips per day to/from development Staff estimates that extension of Tamarack Trail and the additional access point will reduce total trips accessing N. 11t Ave at Hickory Trail Scott Blvd and 11t Ave have the capacity to accommodate the additional traffic generated by the proposed development 2020 CIP to address congestion at 11t Ave and Scott Blvd City's Traffic Calming Program evaluation initiated for Hickory Trail r'iuin'iaal •_� - P.MEFAlc vs 325 wrt a rewwa H16 501' 24' 49"E - 824.28' .. .. .. El SOY 7A 49'E• ip0000 .. .. .. .. ................ �� ::•. . � . •: Edo Vol 39 41 ' 42 44 15.j46 �: :: � '• a ::- - -: '• �µa, 35 38 �.. •er+.� 36 37p rte.,. 47 �' ..Fw .- T-•, __ _ _ ♦ �.-. .�.� - �• .-w -�aw 9 ♦ `` i +' ,+.�+•.\ - \ .fit _ 50in— 51 ♦.- �'N,"' S4 55 56 57 Sg i 59 , 5t g. '1 R 34 33 32 1'30 'z<r 28 27 26 25 24 23F: 22 201 4 .3 • 9r4FFF wA11F Uto .,tet 4 `- - - -'- ,-�- .� it 112 - F� njeo 001, � 17 ' •1 Ei® ��.f. __ :. :•....:..:•.. _r 'Vol 10v �"';p,fA'na� �+�:'r� ...r 6 r-'�'` �w \ ,•BIW e.n. _ ',s6,, .•<;: i4+ i.;. .. .. 15 �. 'rEt ,..N...IFrtN: 3 NMETFIIE +. Fy - � J .�` - u`N .. . . laam aFona CQT11 Dano as OMAO LLn �f +•• ''+•. ; •� � , • � - ''� �• - Y I - T. el.n Fvm ru9r NFe•ar xY w.n p� /y • : '+1�� �}}.. I.e r.re -Y2 •,+ �, `XI + � YSi;:•.Ya-:� '�'-'-� ` - - � u-E �t0 4S•:. :._ �•: .•: ::_ lom Irr of u•t `�<' .�F ' • ..3 53,42"W ••1.14039 , � - am Fr Fe•aw - �T;p NOTES' Pedestrian Connections & Layout of Blocks and Lots Critical and Protected Slopes Proposed development will disturb 12% of critical slopes Code allows disturbance of critical slopes up to 35% No protected slopes will be impacted Addressed with a Final Plat application Dedication requirement of 0.79 acres or payment of an in -lieu fee Based on the proximity of Calder Park, an in - lieu fee would be appropriate. Preliminary plat identifies 3 storm water management basins Public Works staff approved the preliminary grading plan and the preliminary storm water management calculations Deficiency noted in staff report has been resolved. Detailed construction drawings will be reviewed by Staff with the Final Plat application Annexation & Rezoning to ID -RS Rezoning from ID -RS to RS-5-P&Z recommendation to City Council (July - September 2019) Preliminary Plat & Sensitive Areas Development Plan- P&Z recommendation to City Council (August 2019) Final Plat -City Council by Resolution Final Sensitive Areas Development Plan -Staff Planning &Zoning Commission Recommendation The Planning & Zoning Commission recommends approval of SUB19-08, an application submitted by Tamarack Ridge, LLC for a Preliminary Plat and Sensitive Areas Development Plan for Tamarack Ridge subdivision, a 60 -lot, 36.81 -acre residential subdivision located south of Scott Boulevard and north of Tamarack Trail. STAFF PRESENTATION CONCLUDED CITY OF IOWA CITY 410 East Washington Street lova City, lova 52240- 1 826 (3 19) 356-5000 (3 19) 356-5009 FAX ww",Jcgov.org Prepared by: Anne Russett, Senior Planner, 410 E. Washington St, Iowa City, IA 52240; (SUB19-08) Resolution No. 19-238 Resolution approving the Preliminary Plat and Sensitive Areas Development Plan of Tamarack Ridge Subdivision, Iowa City, Iowa. Whereas, the owner, Monument Farms, LLC, filed with the City Clerk, an application for approval of the preliminary plat and sensitive areas development plan of Tamarack Ridge Subdivision, Iowa City, Iowa; and Whereas, the Department of Neighborhood and Development Services and the Public Works Department examined the preliminary plat and sensitive areas development plan and recommended approval; and Whereas, the Planning and Zoning Commission examined the preliminary plat and sensitive areas development plan and, after due deliberation, recommended acceptance and approval of the plat; and Whereas, the preliminary plat and sensitive areas development plan conforms with all of the requirements of the City Ordinances of the City of Iowa City, Iowa. Now, therefore, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa that: 1. The preliminary plat and sensitive areas development plan of Tamarack Ridge Subdivision, Iowa City, Iowa, is hereby approved. 2. The Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Iowa City, Iowa are hereby authorized and directed to certify this resolution, which shall be affixed to the plat after passage and approval by law. Passed and approved this 17 day of September, 2019. M or a7Vo-r GJIV Approved By Attest: �, �fzcPl,` City Clerk City Attorney's Office q It was moved by .rims and seconded by Teague the Resolution be adopted, and upon roll call there were AYES: Nays: slpodlpreliminary plat- resolution draft.doc Absent: Teague Cole Mims Salih Taylor Thomas Throgmorton Item Number: IOx. +r p- W�rm�M CITY O� IOWA CITY www.icgov.org September 17, 2019 Resolution approving the Preliminary Plat and Sensitive Areas Development Plan of South Gilbert Street Commercial Development Subdivision, Iowa City, Iowa. ATTACHMENTS: Description Staff Report with Attachments PZ Prelim Minutes Resolution To: Planning and Zoning Commission STAFF REPORT Prepared by: Jesi Lile, Associate Planner Item: SUB19-09 Date: September 5th, 2019 South Gilbert Commercial Development GENERAL INFORMATION: Applicant/Contact Person: Owner: Requested Action: Purpose: Location: Location Map: Size: Existing Land Use and Zoning: Surrounding Land Use and Zoning Adam Brantman The Governor Group, LLC 2000 James Street Suite 111 Coralville, IA 52241 Patrick Kennedy Kennedys, LLC 1043 Briar Drive Iowa City, IA 52240 Approval of preliminary plat and sensitive areas development plan Create two lots for commercial development South of Southgate Ave between S. Gilbert St. and the Crandic Railroad. 7.06 acres Vacant/Commercial; Intensive Commercial (CI -1) North: Commercial; Community Commercial (CC -2) Vacant; Intensive Commercial (CI -1) South: Vacant; Interim Development Multi -Family K Residential (ID -RM) Park; Neighborhood Public (P-1) East: Vacant & Commercial; Intensive Commercial (CI -1) Residential; High Density Single -Family Residential with a Planned Development Overlay (OPD RS -12) West: Commercial; Intensive Commercial (CI -1) Comprehensive Plan: South District Neighborhood Open Space District: S1 File Date: July 25, 2019 45 Day Limitation Period: September 9, 2019 BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The applicant, The Governor Group, LLC, has requested preliminary plat approval for The South Gilbert Commercial Development subdivision, a 7.06 -acre, 2 -lot commercial subdivision located south of Southgate Avenue between S. Gilbert Street and the CRANDIC Railroad. The new lots will contain one existing building located on Lot 1 and allow for construction of a new commercial development on Lot 2. Upon approval of the preliminary plat and sensitive areas development plan, the applicant will pursue approval of a final plat from City Council. The applicant has chosen not to use the Good Neighbor Policy for this preliminary plat application. ANALYSIS: Zoning: The subject property is zoned Intensive Commercial (CI -1) and is appropriate for businesses that include: outdoor display and storage of merchandise, repair and sales of large equipment or motor vehicles, outdoor commercial amusement and recreational activities or activities/operations conducted in buildings or structures not completely enclosed, eating establishments, office uses, and retail uses. The CI -1 zone does not allow for any residential uses aside from assisted group living uses allowed through a special exception. There is an emphasis on substantial buffering between CI -1 zones and any neighboring residential zones. The only residential zone nearby is across the CRANDIC Railroad to the east. The railroad and woodland will buffer the residential area from these more intensive uses allowed in the CI -1 zone. Compliance with Comprehensive Plan: The subject property is located in the South District, and both the Future Land Use Map of the Comprehensive Plan and the South District Plan identify the subject property as Commercial. This property is located in the South Gilbert Street Commercial Corridor, and has been zoned Intensive Commercial for years but remained vacant. The South District Plan calls for development of this corridor, specifically along Southgate Avenue, with a focus on creating a more attractive, well landscaped entrance to the City. The plan also calls for development of this area as the Riverfront Crossings District to the north redevelops and new residential development occurs to the south. 3 Subdivision design: The proposed 2 -lot subdivision design allows for access to Lot 1 off Southgate Avenue with a building fronting Southgate Avenue. Lot 2 could be accessed from either S. Gilbert Street or Southgate Ave. Outlot A will serve as stormwater detention for both Lot 1 and Lot 2 and as a wetland buffer area for the wetlands on the south side of the property at the intersection of S. Gilbert Street and the CRANDIC Railroad. Transportation: The preliminary plat shows an existing sidewalk along S. Gilbert Street and a proposed sidewalk along the south side of Southgate Ave. There is an existing sidewalk on the north side of Southgate Ave, and the addition of a sidewalk on the south side of the street will help to provide pedestrian access to the new commercial development. There are two bus stops along Southgate Ave that will serve this subdivision, one at Southgate Ave & S. Gilbert St, and another at Southgate Ave and Waterfront Dr. Both stops are served by the Broadway and Cross Park bus routes. Both routes have stops downtown and the Broadway route has stops as far east as Sycamore Street. Neighborhood Open Space: The City's neighborhood open space requirement applies to properties that contain residential uses and planned developments. The final intended uses for the property are not yet identified; however, the only residential use allowed in the Intensive Commercial zone are group households by special exception. Therefore, the neighborhood open space requirement is not applicable to this subdivision. Floodplain: According to FEMA data, this entire property is located within the 500 -year floodplain, with most of the property located in the 100 -year floodplain as well. The developer plans to fill the entire property to the 100 -year floodplain elevation and remove it from the floodplain. Compliance with the City's floodplain management ordinance will be required at site plan review. Environmentally Sensitive Areas: Wetlands: A wetland delineation study conducted April 2019 determined the subject property contains three types of wetlands totaling 0.08 acres; seep (0.03 acres), wet prairie (0.04 acres), and floodplain forest (0.01 acres). These wetlands are located along the southern edge of the property in the area designated as Outlot A. Municipal Code requires a 100 -foot buffer between any development and the edge of any jurisdictional wetland, but provides an option for reducing this buffer if certain qualifications are met. The applicant has proposed using buffer averaging as allowed by the code in order to provide a larger buffer for the majority of the wetlands. When using wetland buffer averaging, the width of the buffer may be reduced by up to 50%, but the total area of the provided buffer must be equal to or greater than the total area of a 100 -foot buffer. The applicant proposes to decrease the buffer around a seep wetland less than 25' wide. The plat shows the remaining 50 -foot buffer area as allowed by code. The buffer area removed by averaging is proposed to be 2,502 square feet, while the added buffer is proposed to be 16,792 square feet. Though wetland seeps are a relatively rare type of wetland, in this instance, wetland buffer averaging is being requested instead of the normal 100 -foot wetland buffer for the following reasons: 1) The combined size of the wetlands is less than 1/10 of an acre. 2) The buffer average increases the size of the buffer for the majority of the wetlands in the subdivision. 3) The wetlands are not buffered to the east near the railroad. ri 4) The wetland seep with the reduced buffer are on the opposite bank of the drainage ditch and outside the grading limits of the detention basin. The applicant proposes to place a stormwater detention basin within the wetland buffer area. This is allowed by the Municipal Code as long as the stormwater detention facilities are designed and constructed to minimize their impact on the protected sensitive features. The plat states that construction activity within Outlot A shall be limited to the construction of the stormwater detention basin and that a silt fence will be installed to provide erosion control and reduce disturbance within the wetlands. Archeological Resources: A Phase 1A archeological study was conducted in April 2019. The study concluded that there is low potential for archeological sites as this area was not suitable for human habitation in the past and recommended no further archaeological investigations in the project area. Storm Water Management: The preliminary plat identifies a storm water management basin at the southern point of the subject site, identified as Outlot A. Public Works staff is reviewing the grading plan and storm water management calculations. Any deficiencies identified must be addressed prior to the approval of the preliminary plat. Infrastructure Fees: No public utilities will be installed for this plat. Each lot will connect to the existing watermain and sanitary sewer. The City requires developers to pay a $456.75 fee per acre for water service. The project site is not located in one of the City's sanitary sewer districts, and therefore, the City collects no sanitary sewer tap on fees. NEXT STEPS: Upon recommendation and approval of the preliminary plat and sensitive areas development plan by the Planning and Zoning Commission, the City Council will consider approval of the preliminary plat. After approval of the preliminary plat, the applicant may submit an application for the final plat. After approval of the final plat, the applicant will be required to submit a Final Sensitive Areas Development Plan for staff review and approval prior to any development activity. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Upon resolution of the deficiency listed below, staff recommends approval of SUB19-09, an application submitted by The Government Group, LLC, for a Preliminary Plat and Sensitive Areas Development Plan for the South Gilbert Commercial Development Subdivision, a 2 -lot, 7.06 -acre commercial subdivision located south of Southgate Avenue between South Gilbert Street and the CRANDIC Railroad. DEFICIENCIES: 1) Public Works staff must approve the preliminary grading plans and the preliminary storm water management calculations. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Location Map 2. Zoning Exhibit 3. Preliminary Plat, received August 29 Approved by: 5 Danielle Sitzman, AICP, Development Services Coordinator Department of Neighborhood and Development Services PRELIMINARY PLAT & SENSITIVE AREAS DEVELOPMENT PLAN SOUTH GILBERT COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT IOWA CITY, JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA i \500Y Soo y !I \ soo Y r,\ _ 1 00Y \ \ PROPOSED 5' SIDEWALK AILROHT \ �NAIL SANITARY MANHOLL \• CO TRO X10 1 _ RIM 645.34 I \ \ 0 \ INV E 18" 633.44 \ .INV E ??" 623.34? \ � � TOP OF RAIL \ INV W 10" 628.30 A ' C 646.0 CONCRETE NV NE 84" 620.81 \ CULVERT 6x4 \ INV SW 84" 620.81 I I 64 646 NV = 640.1 E \ INV = 640.3 W EXISTING HYDRANT AND VALVE X, --- STORM MANHOLE RIM 645.25 ( ) L' I B \ A E C O/ INV S 12" RCP 640.50 C INV W_�-8'-RSP-640. ! 9 I C7 x �l � R STORM MANHOLE RIM 645.37 INV E 4" ABS 641.27 INV N 12" RCP 640.97 STORM MANHOLE1.98 AC A RIM 644.80 (-4 INV E 4" ABS 641.10 \ 86,163 SF INV N 12" RCP 640.60 I Ico \ A � ANITA Y MANHOLE RIM 644.17 6, \ NV NE 84" 620.63 \ \ n I > NV SW 84" 620.63 rn STORM MANHOLE RIM 644.79 „ S B / O INV S 12" 640.19 8" STUB (S)- INV E 18" 639.89 �� - � NV W 24" 639 74 PROJECT LOCATION MAP PLAT APPROVED BY CITY OF IOWA CITY CITY CLERK DATE B 1 KEY NOTES: LEGAL DESCRIPTION THAT PART OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (NW %) LYING SOUTH OF SOUTHGATE AVENUE, EAST OF SOUTH GILBERT STREET AND WEST OF THE CHICAGO, ROCK ISLAND AND PACIFIC RAILWAY IN SECTION 22, AND ALL OF AUDITOR'S PARCEL 2015045 AS RECORDED IN BOOK 59 PAGE 247 OF THE JOHNSON COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE, ALL IN TOWNSHIP 79 NORTH, RANGE 6 WEST OF THE 5TH P.M., CITY OF IOWA CITY, JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA DESCRIBED AS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 1 OF KENNEDY'S WATERFRONT ADDITION - PART FOUR, AS RECORDED IN BOOK 51 PAGE 237 OF THE JOHNSON COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE; THENCE ALONG THE EAST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF SOUTH GILBERT STREET 174.87 FEET ON A 5066.16 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE EAST (CHORD BEARING S03°39'29"E, 174.86 FEET) TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SOUTHGATE AVENUE AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID EAST RIGHT AWAY LINE 903.98 FEET ON A 5066.16 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE EAST (CHORD BEARING S09°45'38"E, 902.78 FEET) TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID CHICAGO, ROCK ISLAND AND PACIFIC RAILWAY; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTH LINE 156.91 FEET ON A 1879.38 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE WEST (CHORD BEARING N30°18'05"E, 156.86 FEET); THENCE ALONG SAID NORTH LINE 256.54 FEET ON A 34997.23 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE WEST (CHORD BEARING N30°14'58"E, 256.54 FEET); THENCE ALONG SAID NORTH LINE 603.16 FEET ON A 1879.86 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE WEST (CHORD BEARING N24°40'50"E, 600.57 FEET) TO THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF SOUTHGATE AVENUE; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE S88046'49"W, 612.34 TO POINT OF BEGINNING. DESCRIBED PARCEL CONTAINS 7.06 ACRES AND IS SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS AND OTHER RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD. EXISTING 84" SANITARY TRUNK SEWER ©- EXISTING 50' SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT © PERIMETER EROSION CONTROL MEASURES. SITE-SPECIFIC MEASURES WILL BE REQUIRED FOR EACH LOT. OPROPOSED 15' PRIVATE UTILITY EASEMENT. OPROPOSED 20' DRAINAGE EASEMENT OPROPOSED 20' PRIVATE STORM SEWER EASEMENT © PROPOSED 10' PRIVATE ELECTRIC UTILITY EASEMENT OFILL SLOPES TO BE 4H:1H OR FLATTER. INSTALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURE ALONG BACK OF EXISTING SIDEWALK AND STABILIZE ACCORDING TO FINAL GRADING PLAN ONO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IS PERMITTED OUTSIDE OF THE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS SHOWN ON THIS PLAT. CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY WITHIN OUTLOT A SHALL BE LIMITED TO CONSTRUCTION OF THE STORMWATER BASIN. AT A MINIMUM, SILT \ FENCE SHALL BE INSTALLED AT THE TOE OF ALL FILL SLOPES PRIOR TO PLACING FILL C �� 400' �`zo OR OTHER LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITY. 645iRo x SANITARY MANHOLE 3 �� RIM 644.18 INV N 10" PVC 629.28 (S) INV S 10" PVC 629.28 _ r INV W 10" PVC 629.2 I INV E 10" PVC 629.,.8 8 63 a 6�9- Z \647- 9 +r -UD x K U.j 3 A A00I___� >,001 �. I w \ '1/ 3( \ 0 CONCRETE F �/ '� I'D\. I %j�� 0� CULVERT Lr)6n N ' f,o ^ \ L O STORM MANHOLE (S) u -}------ S �6 / I i /TVy\ \ T \ \ RIM 643.72 �, / 1.82 AC - INV S 12" 640.32 G --� \ \ �� ` - 3.26 AC - 79,360 SF 636 9 r INV N 12" 640.12 co U �\ 6-qo INV E 24" 639.22 3 z - STORM M NHOLE 141,945 SF / ` WL �M A - �\ INV W 36" 639.12 W O O RIM 643. 2 \ i �� �\ j _ - ` -- U C'4 I INV E ABS 639.62 WL \ � I 0 INV N 15" RCP 639.92 -� �� 1D / C E) ISTING � ►`! / \ SID�WALK 3 z I Z 43 STORM MANHOLE \ - \ \ RIM 641.61 H + // 6 -1NV W 15" 638.01+ / SANITARY MANHOLE J STOR� S) �. RIM 6 OLE INVTN 36" 637.11 643- C " a / RIM 645.11 MANH MAN INV S 36 636.71 I / V W 10-12" PVC 631.76 STORM MANHOLE INV W 15" 638.78 ' I S 10-12" PVC 631.66 RIM 642.94 _ INV S 36" 637.83 RIM 6 MANHOLE � + � + STORM MAN OLE 500 q RIM 15" RIM 6 3.24 500Y INV S 36" 639.74 INV N 36" 637.78 64-3 + � + �C4T � � INV W 15" 638.71 J \� INV N 12" 639.19 645 + + INV E 36" 638.64 I I C X0o I )\001 - -- + � + SffORM MANHOLE INV S 40" 637.71 INV W 12" 638.49 O + + +� _ + ST RIM 641.65 ' (S) INV N 40" 637.56 _ 3 + + �� ST REST �r SANITARY \MN HOLEPROPOSED H I �ST Si RIM 645.1 \3 12 T INV W 4" PV 1 5' SIDEWALK _ R � SANITARY MANHOLE � W 1 Z) � � G1� V � � r INV N 1 ���12" PVC 633.07 E 10-12" PVC 632.97 RIM 645.64 1 CO-- CONCRETE) � � IN S 12" CAST IRON 639.13 100Y J 0 25 50 O N N r � Z O1 J � m D - o(n O ` U oz UU U 0 x a w w z w NOTES: 3RDST of HIGHLAN �OLL AVE r CURRENT PROPERTY ZONING IS C11 -INTENSIVE COMMERCIAL. ZONING AND COTTON ASSOCIATED MINIMUM LOT INFORMATION ARE AS FOLLOWS: REST >- WOOD MINIMUM MINIMUM REQUIRED SETBACKS (FT) 0 DEFOREST- EFORE TAVE FRONTAGE AREA (SF) FRONT SIDE REAR AVE LL? J z a y0<< yw ILL D NONE NONE 10 0 0 z u 00 D eC � STEVENS DR ➢ o 0 m � o m THIS PROPERTY LIES WITHIN FEMA PANEL 19103CO195E (2/16/2007). THE Q O OLYMP C CT z w m z F- w 100 -YEAR FLOODPLAIN ELEVATION IS 643.5 AND THE 500 -YEAR FLOODPLAIN p U' SOUTHGATE AVE U CROSS PARK AVE 4. ALL BUILDINGS MUST BE SET 1 -FOOT ABOVE THE 500 -YEAR FLOODPLAIN o ELEVATION (PER IOWA CITY CODE) PROJECT 5. LOCATION SANDUSKY N IMPERIAL �� �� Pr >� ASPENGl = CT FEMA. � m \ -A OUTLOT A IS INTENDED TO BE USED FOR STORM WATER MANAGEMENT CHERRY WITH ASSOCIATED BLANKET EASEMENT FOR THE ENTIRE OUTLOT. ANUj ASSOCIATION SHALL BE ESTABLISHED FOR THE PURPOSE OF MAINTENANCE PLAT APPROVED BY CITY OF IOWA CITY CITY CLERK DATE B 1 KEY NOTES: LEGAL DESCRIPTION THAT PART OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (NW %) LYING SOUTH OF SOUTHGATE AVENUE, EAST OF SOUTH GILBERT STREET AND WEST OF THE CHICAGO, ROCK ISLAND AND PACIFIC RAILWAY IN SECTION 22, AND ALL OF AUDITOR'S PARCEL 2015045 AS RECORDED IN BOOK 59 PAGE 247 OF THE JOHNSON COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE, ALL IN TOWNSHIP 79 NORTH, RANGE 6 WEST OF THE 5TH P.M., CITY OF IOWA CITY, JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA DESCRIBED AS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 1 OF KENNEDY'S WATERFRONT ADDITION - PART FOUR, AS RECORDED IN BOOK 51 PAGE 237 OF THE JOHNSON COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE; THENCE ALONG THE EAST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF SOUTH GILBERT STREET 174.87 FEET ON A 5066.16 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE EAST (CHORD BEARING S03°39'29"E, 174.86 FEET) TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SOUTHGATE AVENUE AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID EAST RIGHT AWAY LINE 903.98 FEET ON A 5066.16 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE EAST (CHORD BEARING S09°45'38"E, 902.78 FEET) TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID CHICAGO, ROCK ISLAND AND PACIFIC RAILWAY; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTH LINE 156.91 FEET ON A 1879.38 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE WEST (CHORD BEARING N30°18'05"E, 156.86 FEET); THENCE ALONG SAID NORTH LINE 256.54 FEET ON A 34997.23 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE WEST (CHORD BEARING N30°14'58"E, 256.54 FEET); THENCE ALONG SAID NORTH LINE 603.16 FEET ON A 1879.86 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE WEST (CHORD BEARING N24°40'50"E, 600.57 FEET) TO THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF SOUTHGATE AVENUE; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE S88046'49"W, 612.34 TO POINT OF BEGINNING. DESCRIBED PARCEL CONTAINS 7.06 ACRES AND IS SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS AND OTHER RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD. EXISTING 84" SANITARY TRUNK SEWER ©- EXISTING 50' SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT © PERIMETER EROSION CONTROL MEASURES. SITE-SPECIFIC MEASURES WILL BE REQUIRED FOR EACH LOT. OPROPOSED 15' PRIVATE UTILITY EASEMENT. OPROPOSED 20' DRAINAGE EASEMENT OPROPOSED 20' PRIVATE STORM SEWER EASEMENT © PROPOSED 10' PRIVATE ELECTRIC UTILITY EASEMENT OFILL SLOPES TO BE 4H:1H OR FLATTER. INSTALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURE ALONG BACK OF EXISTING SIDEWALK AND STABILIZE ACCORDING TO FINAL GRADING PLAN ONO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IS PERMITTED OUTSIDE OF THE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS SHOWN ON THIS PLAT. CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY WITHIN OUTLOT A SHALL BE LIMITED TO CONSTRUCTION OF THE STORMWATER BASIN. AT A MINIMUM, SILT \ FENCE SHALL BE INSTALLED AT THE TOE OF ALL FILL SLOPES PRIOR TO PLACING FILL C �� 400' �`zo OR OTHER LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITY. 645iRo x SANITARY MANHOLE 3 �� RIM 644.18 INV N 10" PVC 629.28 (S) INV S 10" PVC 629.28 _ r INV W 10" PVC 629.2 I INV E 10" PVC 629.,.8 8 63 a 6�9- Z \647- 9 +r -UD x K U.j 3 A A00I___� >,001 �. I w \ '1/ 3( \ 0 CONCRETE F �/ '� I'D\. I %j�� 0� CULVERT Lr)6n N ' f,o ^ \ L O STORM MANHOLE (S) u -}------ S �6 / I i /TVy\ \ T \ \ RIM 643.72 �, / 1.82 AC - INV S 12" 640.32 G --� \ \ �� ` - 3.26 AC - 79,360 SF 636 9 r INV N 12" 640.12 co U �\ 6-qo INV E 24" 639.22 3 z - STORM M NHOLE 141,945 SF / ` WL �M A - �\ INV W 36" 639.12 W O O RIM 643. 2 \ i �� �\ j _ - ` -- U C'4 I INV E ABS 639.62 WL \ � I 0 INV N 15" RCP 639.92 -� �� 1D / C E) ISTING � ►`! / \ SID�WALK 3 z I Z 43 STORM MANHOLE \ - \ \ RIM 641.61 H + // 6 -1NV W 15" 638.01+ / SANITARY MANHOLE J STOR� S) �. RIM 6 OLE INVTN 36" 637.11 643- C " a / RIM 645.11 MANH MAN INV S 36 636.71 I / V W 10-12" PVC 631.76 STORM MANHOLE INV W 15" 638.78 ' I S 10-12" PVC 631.66 RIM 642.94 _ INV S 36" 637.83 RIM 6 MANHOLE � + � + STORM MAN OLE 500 q RIM 15" RIM 6 3.24 500Y INV S 36" 639.74 INV N 36" 637.78 64-3 + � + �C4T � � INV W 15" 638.71 J \� INV N 12" 639.19 645 + + INV E 36" 638.64 I I C X0o I )\001 - -- + � + SffORM MANHOLE INV S 40" 637.71 INV W 12" 638.49 O + + +� _ + ST RIM 641.65 ' (S) INV N 40" 637.56 _ 3 + + �� ST REST �r SANITARY \MN HOLEPROPOSED H I �ST Si RIM 645.1 \3 12 T INV W 4" PV 1 5' SIDEWALK _ R � SANITARY MANHOLE � W 1 Z) � � G1� V � � r INV N 1 ���12" PVC 633.07 E 10-12" PVC 632.97 RIM 645.64 1 CO-- CONCRETE) � � IN S 12" CAST IRON 639.13 100Y J 0 25 50 O N N r � Z O1 J � m D - o(n O ` U oz UU U 0 x a w w z w NOTES: 1. CURRENT PROPERTY ZONING IS C11 -INTENSIVE COMMERCIAL. ZONING AND ASSOCIATED MINIMUM LOT INFORMATION ARE AS FOLLOWS: MINIMUM MINIMUM REQUIRED SETBACKS (FT) 0 w FRONTAGE AREA (SF) FRONT SIDE REAR J z a NONE NONE 10 0 0 z u 2. THERE ARE NO VARIANCES REQUESTED FOR THIS PLAT 0 3. THIS PROPERTY LIES WITHIN FEMA PANEL 19103CO195E (2/16/2007). THE Q O m a 100 -YEAR FLOODPLAIN ELEVATION IS 643.5 AND THE 500 -YEAR FLOODPLAIN p ELEVATION IS 646.5. U 4. ALL BUILDINGS MUST BE SET 1 -FOOT ABOVE THE 500 -YEAR FLOODPLAIN o ELEVATION (PER IOWA CITY CODE) 5. ENTIRE PROPERTY WILL BE FILLED TO AT LEAST 100 -YEAR FLOOD PLAIN ELEVATION AND REMOVED FROM FLOODPLAIN VIA LOMR-F FILLED WITH FEMA. 6. OUTLOT A IS INTENDED TO BE USED FOR STORM WATER MANAGEMENT WITH ASSOCIATED BLANKET EASEMENT FOR THE ENTIRE OUTLOT. ANUj ASSOCIATION SHALL BE ESTABLISHED FOR THE PURPOSE OF MAINTENANCE zLU U AND MANAGEMENT OF THE OUTLOT A z OUTLOT SIZE (AC) INTENDED USE LU A 1.70 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT & G CONSERVATION EASEMENT AREA 2 7. NO PUBLIC UTILITIES WILL BE INSTALLED AS PART OF THIS PLAT. EACH LOT 0 WILL CONNECT TO EXITING WATER MAIN AND SANITARY SEWER AND SAID U SERVICE CONNECTIONS WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE SITE PLAN 0 r1 APPROVAL PROCESS FOR EACH LOT - CT)8. NO CONNECTIONS WILL BE PERMITTED TO THE EXISTING 84" SANITARY � fV TRUNK SEWER W 9. THE STORMWATER BASIN WITHIN OUTLOT A HAS BEEN SIZED FOR FULLY DEVELOPED CONDITIONS FOR THE ENTIRE PLAT. THE DEVELOPER OF EACH o 0 � (D LOT WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DIRECTING RUNOFF FROM THEIR RESPECTIVEo LU w D LOT TO THE BASIN WITHIN OUTLOT A. N Q o Q 10. THE WETLANDS SHOWN ARE DELINEATED AS FOLLOWS: WETLAND AREA (AC) KEYNOTE z U W SEEP 0.03 C J WET PRAIRIE 0.04 0 FLOODPLAIN FOREST 0.01 0 1 0 TOTAL WETLAND AREA 0.08 > p[ W LEGEND: 0 0 WETLAND AREA W m Q U z cC W C7 EXISTING WETLAND BUFFER REMOVED VIA BUFFER w W 0 AVERAGING (2,502 SF) <(D V G z W PROPOSED WETLAND BUFFER ADDED VIA BUFFER U AVERAGING (16,792 SF) a v 100 FOOT WETLAND BUFFER 50 FOOT WETLAND BUFFER a z = U + + CONSTRUCTION LIMITS. REFER TO KEY NOTE "I" U w SANITARY MANHOLE` EXISTING XISTING HYDRANT � � � SANITARY MANHOLE V 1 �'� � � RIM 642.94 SIDEWALK, AND VALVE - RIM 642.72 INV S 12" PVC 630.84 INV W 10" PVC 630.54 ' ' ? a STORM MANHOLE INV W 10" PVC 634.82 NV 84" E 620.30. J INV E 10" PVC 630.44 RIM 642.41 - -STORM MANHOL STORM MANHOLE INV NW 10" PVC 634.82 INV 84" W 620.30? PROPERTY OWNER: APPLICANT: APPLICANT'S ATTORNEY: PREPARED BY: 1121- RIM 641.0 RIM 641.08 INV W 8" PVC 633.84 �TiARY MANHOLE goo I INV W 15" 637.2 INV S 10-12" PVC 633.74 NEXT LEVEL REAL ESTATE LLC ADAM BRANTMAN MATTHEW ADAM AXIOM CONSULTANTS LLC cC RIM 642.52 - _ - STORM MANHOLE INV N 36" 636.17 2000 JAMES STREET THE GOVERNOR GROUP LLC SIMMONS PERRINE MOYER MICHAEL J. WELCH PE RIM 641.68 INV S 40" 636.0 � � / SUITE 111 2000 JAMES STREET BERGMAN, PLC 60 E. COURT STREET z roo CORALVILLE, IA 52241 SUITE 111 1150 5TH STREET, SUITE 170 UNIT 3 \ CORALVILLE, IA 52241 CORALVILLE, IA 52241 IOWA CITY, IOWA 52240 zLU LUw V) Aug 29, 2019 - 9:21pm S:\PROJECTS\180036\05 Design\Civil-Survey\Plats\180036 prelimplat.dwg w 0 a Q0 M o O z w o 006 a m :5 W (7 z Q w a- MINUTES PRELIMINARY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 5, 2019-7:OOPM—FORMAL MEETING E M M A J. HARVAT HALL, CITY HALL MEMBERS PRESENT: Larry Baker, Carolyn Dyer, Mike Hensch, Phoebe Martin, Mark Signs, Billie Townsend MEMBERS ABSENT: Max Parson STAFF PRESENT: Sara Hektoen, Anne Russett, Jade Pederson OTHERS PRESENT: Mike Welch, Davis Maxwell RECOMMENDATIONS TO CITY COUNCIL: By a vote of 6-0 the Commission recommends approval of ZCA19-03, an application submitted by Capstone Collegiate Communities, LLC for an amendment to the Riverfront Crossings regulating plan to include the property located at 625 S. Gilbert Street in the Central Crossing Subdistrict. By a vote of 6-0 the Commission recommends approval of REZ19-07 an application submitted by Capstone Collegiate Communities, LLC for a rezoning of approximately 1.6 acres of property located at 305 and 315 E. Prentiss Street and 625 S. Gilbert Street from Community Commercial (CC -2) and Intensive Commercial (CI -1) to Riverfront Crossings -Central Crossings (RFC -CC) subject to the following conditions: 1. Dedication of right -a -way along South Gilbert Street. 2. Provision of an access easement to give the City access to a manhole for the trunk sewer. 3. Provision of an access easement to give the City access to a sanitary sewer line. 4. Improvements of Ralston Creek, including the removal of invasive trees, addition of riprap and tree planting, as well as a temporary construction easement for the reconstruction of Prentiss Street Bridge. And then the fifth is 5. Execution of an affordable housing agreement. By a vote of 6-0 the Commission recommends approval of SUB19-09, an application submitted by the Governor Group, LLC for a preliminary plat and sensitive areas development plan for South Gilbert Commercial Development subdivision, a 7.07 acre, 2 -lot commercial subdivision with one outlot located south of Southgate Avenue between S. Gilbert Street and the Crandic Railroad CALL TO ORDER: Hensch called the meeting to order at 7:00 PM. PUBLIC DISCUSSION OF ANY ITEM NOT ON THE AGENDA: None. Planning and Zoning Commission September 5, 2019 Page 10 of 15 further analysis of what actually distinguishes this from any other property in the Riverfront Crossings. As you guys know the conditions imposed on rezoning are supposed to meet public needs that are generated by this rezoning. The City has established the affordable housing requirements for the entire Riverfront Crossings area and ordinances been passed that allow the fee to be spent anywhere in the Riverfront Crossings area not just in each subdistrict so without further analysis of the uniqueness of this situation, she cautions the Commission against deviating from the existing structure. A vote was taken and the motion passed 6-0. CASE NO. SUB19-09: Applicant: The Governor Group, LLC Location: South of Southgate Avenue between S. Gilbert Street and the Crandic Railroad An application submitted by the Governor Group, LLC for a preliminary plat and sensitive areas development plan for South Gilbert Commercial Development subdivision, a 7.07 acre, Not commercial subdivision with one outlot located south of Southgate Avenue between S. Gilbert Street and the Crandic Railroad. Russet began the staff report showing a map of the location of the property. It is located on South Gilbert Street just south of Southgate Avenue and then the CRANDIC is the eastern boundary of the site. The area is all zone CI -1. In terms of the background on this application, there's one existing building on the proposed lot one and the subdivision will allow new commercial development on lot two. The applicant chose not to use the good neighbor policy for this subdivision. In terms of the Comprehensive Plan, both the Comprehensive Plan in the South District Plan identified this as appropriate for commercial development. Russett showed a map of the plat. There are two proposed lots one and two, and then to the south there's outlot A which will be used for stormwater management. There's also wetlands in that outlot. In terms of transportation, the property is accessed via South Gilbert and Southgate Avenue. There's an existing sidewalk along South Gilbert and the preliminary plat shows proposed sidewalks along Southgate Avenue. There's also bus service to this site. The property is within the floodplain. The entire property is located within the 500 year flood plain and most of the property is within the 100 year flood plain. The developer plans to fill this entire site to the 100 year flood plain elevation and any development would need to comply with the city's floodplain management ordinance. As mentioned there are wetlands on the site, there's a total of 0.08 acres of wetlands, all at the southern part of the project site within outlet A. The sensitive areas ordinance does require a 100 foot buffer from all wetlands but also provides an option for reducing that buffer through buffer averaging. The applicant has proposed buffer averaging to decrease the buffer by 50 feet around one wetland located at the north eastern portion of the preliminary plat. The applicant has proposed to remove around 2500 square feet of that buffer and add an additional 16,792 square feet of buffer around the larger wetlands to the southwest of the preliminary plat. The buffer is being requested because the combined size of the wetlands is less than 1/10th of an acre and the buffer averaging would increase the size of the buffer around the majority of wetlands. Also, the wetlands are not buffered to the east because the CRANDIC railroad is on the east side. Also the reduced buffer is on the opposite bank of the drainage ditch and outside Planning and Zoning Commission September 5, 2019 Page 11 of 15 of the grading limits. The applicant also proposed a storm water detention basin within the buffer area and this is allowed as the sensitive areas ordinance does allow storm water detention facilities in these buffer areas. Construction activity within outlot A shall be limited to construction of the stormwater retention basin. There will also be a silt fence installed to provide erosion control and avoid disturbance of the wetlands. There was also a potential for archaeological resources on this site, a phase one study was completed and it concluded that no further investigation was recommended. In the staff report that was submitted to the Commission the stormwater management is originally listed as a deficiency but Public Works Department has reviewed some changes made to the stormwater plans and they have approved the preliminary stormwater management plan so that is no longer a deficiency. The role of the Commission in the review of a preliminary plan is to review it to see if the plat complies with our subdivision regulations and other applicable codes as well as the Comprehensive Plan Next steps, after a recommendation of approval from the Commission, the Council will review the preliminary plan and sensitive areas development plan and then the applicant would be able to submit a final plat application and final sensitive areas development plan. Staff does recommend approval of SUB19-09 an application submitted by the Governor Group LLC for a preliminary plat and sensitive areas development plan for the South Gilbert commercial development subdivision. A two lot 7.06 acre commercial subdivision located south of Southgate Avenue between South Gilbert Street and Crandic railroad. Signs asked if there was a building on the site. Russett said there is on lot one, she believes it is under construction right now. Signs asked if that is that like getting the cart before the horse? Russett said they were able to submit a site plan for the site, even without the subdivision, now they want to sell off lot 2 so they needed to subdivided. Hensch opened the public hearing. Mike Welch (Axiom Consultants) is representing the Governor Group. Regarding fill on this site, almost the entire property has already been filled above the hundred year flood floodplain over the last like 10 years or so there's just little bits along the perimeter that aren't quite up there most mostly because of sidewalk raids. As part of this project, it will get sidewalk constructed along the south side of Southgate Avenue, that section of sidewalk completed from South Gilbert to the railroad tracks. And then any access from lot two onto South Gilbert would have to go through Public Works comply with access onto an arterial street. Hensch asked about the stormwater area and for clarification on the whole issue. Because they pretty much filled up the whole area there doesn't seem like there could be much left for the wetlands? Welch stated the wetlands go down that east property line along the Crandic, they are actually seep wetlands, which aren't as common, but they're actually up on the railroad embankment, it's where there's waters like seeping out of the railroad embankment and providing the hydrology for those wetlands. Hensch asked if it was coming through from the other side, because that hill. Welch said they didn't really investigate that but would guess is that's where the water is coming from. Typically seen on old railroad grades are those real sluggish kind of drainage channels alongside of them and that's what's creating a lot of the Planning and Zoning Commission September 5, 2019 Page 12 of 15 additional wetlands. Back 10 plus years ago when the Kennedys first started filling this property they did contact the Core and at that time the Core told them that there was no need to do that they weren't going to take jurisdiction so Code didn't apply. And so they filled up to where they filled up. This time and going through the process the Core said yes, there's a connection to the river, so we are going to take jurisdiction, until then we had the wetland investigation done. Hensch stated he presumed they had to do a phase one environmental survey for this. He imagines there were some findings relative to the railroad, with all the creosote and various chemicals thrown on that over the years. Welch confirmed that is correct. They did a phase one environmental survey, but because the railroad is off their property they didn't extend that far. Dyer asked if the wetlands would be maintained or just be swamp. Welch said the basin or the wetlands really will not be changed from what they are now, the grading will stop and those wetlands will remain undisturbed. Hensch closed the public hearing. Baker moved to recommend approval of SUB19-09, an application submitted by the Governor Group, LLC for a preliminary plat and sensitive areas development plan for South Gilbert Commercial Development subdivision, a 7.07 acre, 2 -lot commercial subdivision with one outlot located south of Southgate Avenue between S. Gilbert Street and the Crandic Railroad. Dyer seconded the motion. Hensch said he has been driving past this area since '93 so wasn't too big fan of the way the fill was thrown in there over the years but is glad to see the area getting developed and the wetlands are going to be protected. Probably smaller than it should have been, but you know things change over times. A vote was taken and the motion passed 6-0. CONSIDERATION OF MEETING MINUTES: AUGUST 15, 2019 Townsend moved to approve the meeting minutes of August 15 2019. Baker seconded. A vote was taken and the motion passed 6-0. PLANNING AND ZONING INFORMATION: Russett didn't have any updates. Baker asked about the issue raised earlier in the first item on the agenda about the sidewalks that are just right next to the roadway. What is the understanding of what his concern was and where you're going with it now? Russett stated her understanding was that Baker would like the STAFF PRESENTATION TO FOLLOW: =11 i � 1 fir, CITY OF IOWA CITY 410 East Washington Street Iowa City, Iowa S2240-1826 (3 19) 356-5000 (319) 356-5009 FAX www.icgov.org Item 10.c.: South Gilbert Street Commercial Development Preliminary Plat and Sensitive Areas Development Plan SU B19-09 A resolution approving the Preliminary Plat and Sensitive Areas Development Plan of South Gilbert Street Commercial Development Subdivision, Iowa City, Iowa. One existing building on Lot 1. Subdivision will allow new commercial development on Lot 2. Applicant chose not to use the good neighbor policy -No change in zoning requested. & SENSITIVE AREAS DEVELOPMENT PLAN SOUTH GILBERT COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT t' IOWA CIN, JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA r LO-J.TIdN PLAT APPROVED BY J ...�.,,.�..,. Pri T �E � C wrm�.umnm�,R.xuwnaroamrc.w fi�' x 1 v ro®mruaxmw.maew.ert EgSa' d C 4T IDIyIT�LOT A 12AC 1 N O - .. -,5011TH- _ _ E Conformance with the Comprehensive Plan Streets and Circulation Sidewalks, Trails, and Pedestrian Connections Layout of Blocks and Lots Open Space -NA if no residential development Utilities Comprehensive Plan Comprehensive Plan: General Commercial k ., . am OM4MU v Iw 4 South District Plan: Commercial Existing sidewalk along S. Gilbert, proposed sidewalk along Southgate Ave. Two bus stops along Southgate Ave. to serve this subdivision. Broadway & Cross Park lines Entire property located in 500 -year floodplain. Most of property located in 100 -year floodplain. Developer plans to fill entire property to 100 - year floodplain Any development must comply with the City's floodplain management ordinance at the time of Site Plan Review. Environmentally Sensitive Areas Wetlands * 3 types (0.08 acres total): Seep (0.03 acres), Wet Prairie (0.04 acres), Floodplain Forest (0.01 acres). Southern edge of property in Outlot A. 100 -foot buffer required, but option for reducing buffer with buffer averaging. Proposed Buffer Averaging. Decrease buffer by 50 -feet around small wetland seep. Remove 2,502 square feet and add 16,792 square feet. Buffering requested for following reasons: Combined size of wetland is less than 1/10 acre. Buffer average increase size of buffer around majority of wetlands. Wetlands are not buffered to the east near the railroad. Wetland seep with reduced buffer are on the opposite bank of the drainage ditch and outside the grading limits of the detention basin Environmentally Sensitive Areas (Cont.) Archeological Resources: Cultural Resource Management (CRM) Study conducted in 2019. Low potential for archeological sites — no further investigation recommended. Outlot A contains a stormwater management basin. Deficiency noted in staff report has been resolved. Detailed construction drawings will be reviewed by Staff with the Final Plat application Preliminary Plat & Sensitive Areas Development Plan- P&Z recommendation to City Council (September 2019) Final Plat -City Council by Resolution Final Sensitive Areas Development Plan -Staff Planning Commission Recommendation Staff recommends approval of SUB19-09, an application submitted by The Governor Group, LLC for a Preliminary Plat and Sensitive Areas Development Plan for the South Gilbert Commercial Development Subdivision, a 2 -lot, 7.06 acre commercial subdivision located south of Southgate Avenue between South Gilbert Street and the CRANDIC Railroad. STAFF PRESENTATION CONCLUDED CITY OF IOWA CITY 410 East Washington Street lova City, lova 52240- 1 826 (3 19) 356-5000 (3 19) 356-5009 FAX ww",Jcgov.org ice.= Prepared by: Jesi Life, Associate Planner, 410 E. Washington St, Iowa City, IA 52240; 319-356-5240 (SUB19-09) Resolution No. 19-239 Resolution approving the preliminary plat and sensitive areas development plan of South Gilbert Commercial Development Subdivision, Iowa City, Iowa. Whereas, the owner, Next Level Real Estate, LLC, filed with the City Clerk, an application for approval of the preliminary plat and sensitive areas development plan of South Gilbert Commercial Development Subdivision, Iowa City, Iowa; and Whereas, the Department of Neighborhood and Development Services and the Public Works Department examined the preliminary plat and sensitive areas development plan and recommended approval; and Whereas, the Planning and Zoning Commission examined the preliminary plat and sensitive areas development plan and, after due deliberation, recommended acceptance and approval of the plat; and Whereas, the preliminary plat and sensitive areas development plan conforms with all of the requirements of the City Ordinances of the City of Iowa City, Iowa. Now, therefore, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa that: 1. The preliminary plat and sensitive areas development plan of South Gilbert Commercial Development Subdivision, Iowa City, Iowa, is hereby approved. 2. The Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Iowa City, Iowa are hereby authorized and directed to certify this resolution, which shall be affixed to the plat after passage and approval by law. Passed and approved this 17day of September, 2019. Ma or Attest: Approved By _��`� R�R� Q, _ �"�U✓� Ci yClerk City Attorney's Office r r Z �t t It was moved by trims and seconded by Teague the Resolution be adopted, and upon roll call there were: AYES: Nays: Absent: X Teague X Cole X Mims X Salih X Taylor slpcd\iowa city.4040.1.resolution_final.doc Resolution No. 19-239 Page 2 AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: X Thomas x Throgmorton Item Number: 13. �, CITY OF IOWA CITY �'�COUNCIL ACTION REPORT September 17, 2019 Resolution authorizing funding of $25,000 in FY20, and intent to budget $25,000 each year from FY21 through FY24 for Kirkwood Community College (KCC) to expand English Language learning capacity in the southern end of the Iowa City/Cedar Rapids corridor. Prepared By: Wendy Ford, Economic Development Coordinator Reviewed By: Simon Andrew, Assistant to the City Manager Fiscal Impact: FY 2020: $25,000 Community Development funds. FY 2021 - 24: $25,000 Community Development funds. Recommendations: Staff: Commission: Council Economic Development Committee voted 3 - 0 to recommend funding at their August 28, 2019 meeting. Attachments: Letter from Kirkwood President, Lori Sundberg Resolution Executive Summary: Kirkwood Community College has provided adult English Language Learning (ELL) classes in a variety of ways for years and recently, has seen a marked increase in demand throughout the Corridor with the strongest demand coming from the Iowa City area. Coincidentally, local employers are facing the lowest unemployment rates in decades at 2.2%. Kirkwood asserts they could address two significant problems with one solution if they could expand their ELL capacity in the southern end of the corridor: 1 .) If more people were to complete ELL classes, the labor pool for local employers would increase, and 2.) Individuals completing the ELL courses would be improving their employment prospects and thus, the economic health of their families. Background /Analysis: The cost of expanding the program is budgeted at $150,000 per year for 5 years. Lori Sundberg, President of Kirkwood Community College, supports an expansion of services, programs and partnerships to address this growing need, and has pledged $75,000 per year from state and Kirkwood general funds. With half of the funding in place, Kirkwood is seeking support from the communities and employers in the southern end of the corridor that would benefit from the larger pool of workforce. The funds would be used exclusively in the southern end of the corridor, increase access and capacity and accelerate English language learning, and partner with employers to support this population. Staff recommends supporting Kirkwood in this ELL expansion with $25,000 per year for 5 years. Addressing these issues in this way is directly aligned with the Council Strategic Priority of promoting a strong and resilient local economy through cooperation with the Iowa City Community School District, Iowa Workforce Development, Kirkwood Community College, Iowa Works, and others to increase opportunities for marginalized populations and low-income individuals to obtain access to skills training and good jobs. The rapid increase in the non-English speaking refugee and immigrant population creates an opportunity for the community that we should address. 1) The lack of English language skills limits employment and thus, economic opportunities for a large segment of our population, and 2) if our workforce could grow simply with the addition of English language skills, it would help our employers' difficulty in filling open positions. There is also a sustainability consideration. Several Eastern Iowa employers attract employees from up to 60 miles away. Helping our local workforce develop the skills they need to fill vacancies locally will reduce the amount of travel for employees filling these positions. The City Manager would enter into a memorandum of understanding with Kirkwood, after which budgeted funds identified as "opportunity populations workforce assistance" in the FY20 budget could be expended. ATTACHMENTS: Description Sundberg Letter Resolution September 4, 2019 City of Iowa City 410 E Washington Street Iowa City Ia 52240 City Council Members: On behalf of Kirkwood Community College and the Continuing Education Department, I want to extend my thanks to you for the recent Economic Development Committee recommendation for support of $25,000 for five years in support of the expansion of Kirkwood's English as a Second Language (ESL) classes and employer partnerships through contextualized ESL Earn -and -Learn programs. Your contribution is an important investment that provides english language learners opportunities to grow — and to achieve their dreams in Iowa City! These funds will be matched by Kirkwood Community College and will allow expansion of class sections and sites, increase student services, build pathways to successful employment and support new partnerships with community-based organizations to create a system of supports and services throughout the Iowa City area. At Kirkwood, we identify needs, provide access to quality education and training, and promote opportunities for lifelong learning. We couldn't continue this mission without you! We appreciate your commitment and partnership, together with our students, we send many thanks for your support. Sincerely, i Lori L. Sundberg, D.B.A. Kirkwood Community College President Prepared by: Wendy Ford, 410 E. Washington St., Iowa City, IA 52240 (319) 356-5248 Resolution: 19-240 Resolution authorizing funding of $25,000 in FY20, and intent to budget $25,000 each year from FY21 through FY24 for Kirkwood Community College (KCC) to expand English Language learning capacity in the southern end of the Iowa City/Cedar Rapids corridor. Whereas, the City of Iowa City has established Strategic Planning Priorities, including promoting a strong and resilient economy through cooperation with KCC, and others, to increase opportunities for marginalized populations and low-income individuals to gain access to skills training and jobs; and Whereas, KCC's mission also includes identifying community needs and providing access to education and training; and Whereas, Expanding English Language learning capacity accomplishes two goals common to Kirkwood Community College and the City of Iowa City; and Whereas, those goals include helping to make more people eligible for employment and improving their job prospects while increasing the number of eligible employees in a tight workforce; and Whereas, KCC has determined program costs to be $150,000 per year and KCC is committed to funding $75,000 per year; and Whereas, KCC is seeking financial participating from the other municipalities and employers in the south end of the corridor to fill the remainder of the funding gap; and Whereas, on August 28, 2019 the City Council Economic Development Committee unanimously approved a recommendation to the full City Council supporting a request for $25,000 for FY20 and intent to budget four additional years in FY 21 through FY24; and Whereas, funds for the FY20 expense would be made available from account 10210510448020 Community Development Assistance for opportunity populations workforce assistance and the allocation for future years would be budgeted in the same account, Now, therefore, be it resolved by the city council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa, that: 1. The City Council approves funding assistance to Kirkwood Community College for the amount of $25,000 from the FY2020 budget, and intends to budget $25,000 for fiscal years 2021 –2024. 2. The City Manager is authorized to enter into a Memorandum of Understanding with Kirkwood Community College to memorialize the expectations of each entity. Passed and approved this 17th day of September —,20 19 Resolution No. 19-240 Page 2 MA OR ATTEST: CITY CLERK roved ))- 9-1 t2 City Attorney's Office Resolution No. 19-240 Page 3 It was moved by Mims and seconded by Cole Resolution be adopted, and upon roll call there were: AYES: x NAYS: ABSENT: Cole Mims Salih Taylor Teague Thomas Throgmorton the Item Number: 14. ®I CITY OF IOWA CITY u► �� COUNCIL ACTION REPORT September 17, 2019 Resolution authorizing the installation of speed humps on Willow Street, between Brookside Drive and Muscatine Avenue. Prepared By: Sarah Walz, Assistant Transportation Planner Reviewed By: Kent Ralston, Transportation Planner Tracy Hightshoe, Director, Neighborhood and Development Services Fiscal Impact: C I P#S3816 Recommendations: Staff: Approval Commission: N/A Attachments: Resolution Executive Summary: The residents of Willow Street have successfully completed the City of Iowa City's Traffic Calming Program. The street qualifies for the program based on traffic speed data. Staff discussed the proposal with residents at a neighborhood meeting held on June 18. A follow-up survey of neighbors yielded an 90% response rate. Of those households that responded, 60% indicated their approval of the proposal to install speed humps. Background /Analysis: In response to a qualifying petition from residents of Willow Street, staff gathered speed and traffic data on the street during the month of April. Vehicle speed measurements and counts were collected in both the northbound and southbound lanes at two locations. The speed limit on Willow St. is 25 MPH. To qualify for traffic calming, the 85th percentile speed must exceed the legal speed limit by 5 MPH. This means 15% of vehicles must be travelling at 30 MPH or higher. Average speeds measured along the street ranged from 28-31 MPH with 15% of drivers traveling at speeds of over 34 MPH one location and over 32 MPH at the second location. Average traffic volumes range from 675 to 786 vehicles per day. Staff reviewed the speed data and the street context with the City Engineer, Streets Department, and the Fire Department to consider appropriate ways to address the residents' concerns. After review, staff concluded that speed humps would be the most safe and effective means for lowering speeds. A neighborhood meeting was held on June 18 to discuss options for slowing speeds. A majority of residents who attended the meeting favored speed humps. On July 5, a survey was mailed to residents of Willow Street. The City's Traffic Calming Program requires that at least 50% of those addresses surveyed return a survey postcard and, of those households that respond, 60% must indicate support for the proposed traffic calming project. Staff mailed surveys to 22 addresses located directly adjacent to the residential portion of Willow Street. Responses were returned by 20 households: a 90% response rate. Of those responding, 12 households checked "YES" and 8 households checked "NO" with regard to the proposed installation of speed humps. That is 60% in support of installation of speed humps. In August, signs were posted along Willow Street and notice was sent to neighbors regarding the survey results. Both the sign and the letter provided the meeting date at which the City Council would consider the request for speed humps. Recently, the City installed a stop sign at the intersection of Brookside Drive and Willow Street in response to neighborhood concerns that drivers were not yielding at the intersection. A pedestrian crossing on Brookside Drive was also marked on the west side of the intersection with Willow Street in order to guide pedestrians making the connection to Lucas Elementary. On August 20, the City Council approved a school speed zone on the portion of Willow Street, between Eastwood Drive and Muscatine Avenue. It is hoped that the these actions, along with the proposed speed humps, will alleviate speeding issues in the residential neighborhood and provide a safer environment for children walking to school. Funding for traffic calming projects is allocated from a line item in the CI P (S3816). The cost to construct a single speed hump is approximately $1,500 to $2,000. Staff is recommending 4 speed humps along this portion of the street in order to meet the optimal spacing necessary to encourage drivers to travel at a consistent speed of 25 MPH. Staff recommends approval of the resolution approving installation of speed humps on Willow Street. ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution I Prepared by: Sarah Walz, Assistant Transportation Planner, 410 E. Washington St., Iowa City, IA 52240 (319) 356-5239 Resolution no. 19-241 Resolution authorizing the installation of speed humps on Willow Street, between Brookside Drive and Muscatine Avenue. Whereas, the City Council has established a traffic calming program for the City of Iowa City for the purpose of considering neighborhood traffic calming projects; and Whereas, the residents of Willow Street have successfully completed the traffic calming process according to the City Council's approved procedure; and Whereas, a neighborhood survey has been conducted in accordance with the approved traffic calming program and a 60% majority of respondents indicated they are in favor of speed humps; and Whereas, the City Council finds said proposal to be in the public interest and is consistent with its adopted traffic calming program. Now, therefore, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa, that: 1. The proposal for speed humps on Willow Street is hereby approved. 2. City staff is directed to proceed with the installation of speed humps between Brookside Drive and Muscatine Avenue. Passed and approved this 17tb day of September 2019. Attest: Kejl, e-Frueliling, City Cler JirffThrogmorton, Mayor Approved by City Attorney's Office Resolution No. Page 2 19-241 It was moved by Teague and seconded by Mims Resolution be adopted, and upon roll call there were: AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: Cole Sahh Taylor Teague Thomas Throgmorton the Kellie Fruehling From: Sent: To: Sarah Walz Thursday, September 12, 2019 5:03 PM Kellie Fruehling Late Handouts Distributed Cc: Kent Ralston q7 )6,1— j 9 Subject: FW: Speed humps on Willow Street (Date) Kellie, This should be included as correspondence with the Willow Street Traffic Calming on the City Council Agenda for September 17. Thank you. Sarah From: Deb White <white.mabelinic@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2019 4:55 PM To: Streets for People <streetsforpeople@iowa-city.org> Subject: Speed humps on Willow Street My husband and I strongly oppose placing speed humps on Willow Street in east Iowa City, a road that is a large part of our daily commute! We have lived in the area that will be affected for 41 years and we are feeling "boxed in" by streets with speed humps. Below is a list of our reasons for opposition: • First and foremost, we are in our mid -sixties and know for a fact that speed humps slow down the response time of emergency vehicles, which we are not willing to accept. • There are already speed humps on Friendship Street between Brookside Dr. and Court St. (which is another route to our home) that will already delay anything coming from that direction. • There are always cars parked on the east side of Willow Street, which means there is seldom a time when you aren't waiting for a vehicle coming from the other direction before you can proceed up or down the hill, thus eliminating the opportunity to get up much speed. • A stop sign has already been placed at the intersection of Willow and Brookside, again preventing a driver from going too fast. • "School Speed Zone" signs were recently installed with a 20 mph speed limit that are in force from 7 a.m. to 5 p.m We understand the need for safety measures, but when is enough enough? This likely stems from a couple of "squeaky wheels" but there are other people's concerns to consider as well. Thank you. Item Number: 15. �, CITY OF IOWA CITY �'�COUNCIL ACTION REPORT September 17, 2019 Resolution adopting an assessment schedule of unpaid mowing, clean-up of property, snow removal, sidewalk repair, and stop box repair charges and directing the Clerk to certify the same to the Johnson County Treasurer for collection in the same manner as property taxes. Prepared By: Kellie Fruehling, City Clerk Reviewed By: Geoff Fruin, City Manager Fiscal Impact: No impact Recommendations: Staff: Approval 1 •uu •a ►/_1 Attachments: Resolution w/ Exhibits A and B Executive Summary: This resolution is to adopt an assessment schedule for unpaid mowing, property clean-up, snow removal, sidewalk repair, and stop box repair. Background /Analysis: The City has the authority under Iowa Code §364.13B to assess the nuisance abatement costs in the same manner as a property tax. This resolution allows the City Clerk to certify to the Johnson County Treasurer the abatement cost to be assessed against the property. This assessment is being pursued only after the City took many steps to resolve the matter. The City notified the homeowners to abate the nuisance (for example, to remove snow from the sidewalk) and after the homeowner did not take action to abate the nuisance, the City abated the nuisance and billed the owner. After being billed at least twice, these owners still have not paid the abatement costs. The City has sent a letter to the homeowner giving them notice that this resolution would be on the agenda, a copy of which is attached to the resolution. No interest will be charged if the owner pays within 30 days of the first required publication. Attached as an exhibit to the resolution is a list of the properties that will be assessed and the amount that will be assessed. ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution Exhibit A Exhibit B U'l to VAO,, D LDL437Sf- �T Cw 4o Cz.e v\A o W- J -S AG vu - j �wh r Cta�CID r i.ate Handouts Distributed (Date) Prepared by: Kellie Fruehling, 410 E. Washington St., Iowa City, IA 52240-319-356-5040 RESOLUTION NO. 19-242 Resolution adopting an assessment schedule of unpaid mowing, clean-up of property, snow removal, sidewalk repair, and stop box repair charges and directing the Clerk to certify the same to the Johnson County Treasurer for collection in the same manner as property taxes. Whereas, the City Clerk has filed with the City Clerk an assessment schedule providing the amount to be assessed against certain lots for the actual unpaid abatement costs of mowing, cleaning up property, removing snow, repairing sidewalks, and repairing stop boxes in the same manner as property taxes; Whereas, said schedule is attached as Exhibit A to this resolution and incorporated herein by this reference; Whereas, Iowa Code § 364.13B authorizes the City Council to assess against the property said abatement costs in the same manner as property taxes; and Whereas, the City Council finds that the property owners listed in Exhibit A have received a written notice of the date and time of the public hearing on the adoption of said assessment schedule, in substantially the same form attached hereto as Exhibit B. Now, therefore, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa: Exhibit A is adopted as the final assessment schedule pursuant to Iowa Code § 384.60(1). The amounts listed in Exhibit A for unpaid mowing charges, clean-up property charges, snow removal charges, sidewalk repair charges and stop box repair charges are confirmed and levied against, the properties listed in Exhibit A. All unpaid assessments not paid within thirty (30) days after the first publication of the final assessment schedule shall bear interest at the rate of 9% per annum, commencing on October 31, 2019. Assessments are payable at Johnson Country Treasurer, 13 South Dubuque Street, Iowa City, Iowa. Until October 30, 2019 payment maybe made at the City Clerk, 410 E. Washington Street, Iowa City, Iowa. The City Clerk is hereby directed to certify the schedule as set out in Exhibit A to the Treasurer of Johnson County, Iowa for collection in the same manner as property taxes. The assessment cannot be paid in installments. The City Clerk is further directed to publish notice of the schedule once each week for two consecutive weeks in the manner provided in Iowa Code § 362.3, the first publication of which shall be not more than fifteen (15) days from the date of filing of the final assessment schedule. Passed and approved this 17th day of September 2019. Ma r ATTEST: City Jerk Approve A'�j City Attomey's Office It was moved byMims and seconded by Cole the Resolution be adopted, and upon roll call there was: AYES: i� sue\Ord&Ras\AbateRes.doc NAYS: ABSENT: Cole Mims Salih Taylor Teague Thomas Throgmorton CITY OF IOWA CITY ASSESSMENT SCHEDULE OF UNPAID WEED REMOVAL, SIDEWALK REPAIR, SNOW REMOVAL, STOP BOX REPAIR, AND PROPERTY CLEANUP Frozen Meters = Water Lien Parcel Appraised Service(s) Date of Cost of Balance Property Address Legal Description Number Value Property Owner Rendered Sarvice(s) Service Invoice # Outstanding IOWA CITY (ORIGINAL TOWN) COM NW COR LOT 4; S 100'; E 102; S 50'; E 18'; N BETA MU BLDG CO 630 N DUBUQUE ST 601; W 16, N 90'& W 104' TO BEG 1010207005 $ 752,710.00 THE SIGMA NU FRAT Snow Removal 2/22/2019 $ 770.00 68085 $ 770.00 IOWA CITY (ORIGINAL TOWN) W 65' OF E 923 E MARKET Si F 1010407003 $ 176,350.00 COONEY, SANDRA KAY Snow Removal 3/14/2019 $ 175.00 68062 $ 75.00 IOWA CITY (ORIGINAL TOWN) W 65' OF E 923 E MARKET ST 197 OF N 1010407003 $ 176,350.00 GOONEY, SANDRA KAY Snow Removal 2/14/2019 $ 175.00 1 68084 $ 175.00 63 AMBER LN LAKESIDE ADDITION LOT 28 1023410001 $ 147,260.00 GALVAN, RUBEN A Snow Removal 3/12/2019 $ 190.00 68059 $ 190.00 FAIR MEADOWS ADDITION 1ST UNIT LOT 4 2113 HOLLYWOOD BLVD ELK 5 1023108005 $ 107,000.00 HAIMA, CHRISTOPHER R Snow Removal 3/8/2019 $ 190.00 68052 $ 190.00 KARR, ALEX M KARR, CHARLES M 735 DEARBORN ST RUNDELL ADDITION LOT 15 BLK 9 1014277005 $ 193,320.00 KARR. MELISSA N Snow Removal 3/6/2019 $ 190.00 68007 $ 190.00 HOLLYWOOD MANOR ADDITION PART 1 SCHUETZEN INVESTMENTS 1102 HOLLYWOOD BLVD LOT 1 & W 20' LOT 2 1023231002 $ 1,140,270.00 LLC Snow Removal 2/26/2019 $ 250.00 68020 $ 250.00 IOWA CITY (ORIGINAL TOWN) W 30' LOT SCHWALM, LESLIE 819 E MARKET Si E 25' T B 1010406006 $ 247,890.00 Snow Removal 2/14/2019 $ 195.00 68070 $ 170.00 OAK HILL ADDITION N 30' LOT 8 & S 10' STAM, LISA 525 S LUCAS ST LOT 7 1015104017 $ 181,350.00 Snow Removal 2/15/2019 $ 230.00 68072 $ 230.00 IOWA CITY (ORIGINAL TOWN) N 90' LOT 5 STEYN, JAN 410 N LUCAS Si BLK 8 1010182007 $ 209,920.00 Snow Removal 1/17/2019 $ 223.00 67474 $ 223.00 1048 LANGENBERG AVE SANDHILL ESTATES - PART 3 LOT 94 1023362003 $ 279,500.00 WANG, YUANREN Snow Removal 2/27/2019 $ 195.00 68087 $ 195.00 IOWA CITY (ORIGINAL TOWN) E 1/2 LOT 7 WILLIAMS, JAY 322 E BLOOMINGTON Si BLK 57 1010163007 $ 189,580.00 WILSON, RACHAEL B Snow Removal 3/4/2019 $ 190.00 68061 $ 190.00 IOWA CITY (ORIGINAL TOWN) E 1/2 LOT 7 WILLIAM, JAY 322 E BLOOMINGTON ST BLK 57 1010163007 $ 189,580.00 Snow Removal 2/16/2019 $ 277.00 68076 $ 277.00 IOWA CITY (ORIGINAL TOWN) E 112 LOT 7 WILLIAMS, JAY 322E BLOOMINGTON ST 1010163007 $ 189,580.00 IWILSON, gACHAEL B Snow Removal 2/22/2019 $ 170.00 68077 $ 170.00 Dear Property Owner: This is to notify you that the City Council will be considering a resolution on September 17, 2019 that will assess against your property the cost that the City has incurred to do one of the following: unpaid mowing, clean-up of property, snow removal, sidewalk repair, or stop box repair charges. Enclosed for your information is a copy of the bill. If the City Council approves the assessment against your property, the amount will be collected by the Johnson County Treasurer in the same manner as a property tax. The City Council meeting begins at 7:00 pm and is held at Harvat Hall, City Hall, 410 E. Washington St., Iowa City, Iowa. If you want to challenge the assessment, you are advised to come to the City Council meeting. You may also submit a letter or email to the City Council. The mailing address is: City Council, % City Clerk, 410 E. Washington St., Iowa City, IA 52240 and the email address is council(CDiowa-citv.org Please note that all communication with City Council is a public record. If you pay the amount due in full before the City Council meeting, the resolution will not include an assessment against your property. You can make the payment by mailing or coming in person to the City Clerk's office, 410 East Washington Street, between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. If property is assessed and the amount is not paid within the specified 30 days, interest will accrue at a rate set by the City Council. If you have any questions about the resolution, please contact my office at 356-5041. Sincerely, Ashley Platz Deputy City Clerk Enc. Copy to: Accounting Division-w/enc. A EXHIBIT B ,�► ir""III {��; �� CITY OF IOWA CITY 410 East Washington Strect Iowa City. Iowa 52240-1$26 September 10, 2019 (3 19) 356-5000 (319) 356-5009 FAX www, cgov. org «Property_Owner» «Mailing_Address» «City» , «State» «ZIP» Dear Property Owner: This is to notify you that the City Council will be considering a resolution on September 17, 2019 that will assess against your property the cost that the City has incurred to do one of the following: unpaid mowing, clean-up of property, snow removal, sidewalk repair, or stop box repair charges. Enclosed for your information is a copy of the bill. If the City Council approves the assessment against your property, the amount will be collected by the Johnson County Treasurer in the same manner as a property tax. The City Council meeting begins at 7:00 pm and is held at Harvat Hall, City Hall, 410 E. Washington St., Iowa City, Iowa. If you want to challenge the assessment, you are advised to come to the City Council meeting. You may also submit a letter or email to the City Council. The mailing address is: City Council, % City Clerk, 410 E. Washington St., Iowa City, IA 52240 and the email address is council(CDiowa-citv.org Please note that all communication with City Council is a public record. If you pay the amount due in full before the City Council meeting, the resolution will not include an assessment against your property. You can make the payment by mailing or coming in person to the City Clerk's office, 410 East Washington Street, between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. If property is assessed and the amount is not paid within the specified 30 days, interest will accrue at a rate set by the City Council. If you have any questions about the resolution, please contact my office at 356-5041. Sincerely, Ashley Platz Deputy City Clerk Enc. Copy to: Accounting Division-w/enc. Exhibit -o-s o --C 6i-)7-19 *)-"5' I 1 OF IOWA CITY ASSESSMENT SCHEDULE OF UNPAID WEED REMOVAL, SIDEWALK REPAIR, SNOW REMOVAL, STOP BOX REPAIR, AND PROPERTY CLEANUP Frozen Meters - Water Lien Parcel Appraised service(s) Date of Cost of Balance Property Address Lega ascription Number Value Property Owner Rendered Service(s) Service nvoice# Outstanding NORTH AI DEVELOPMENT LOTS 14 & 602 RUPPERT RD 15 1016451011 $ 1,019,950.00 AU-OHAUS LTD Snow Removal 3/5/201 $ 190.00 68042 $ 190.00 IOWA CITY {ORIGINAL WN} COM NW COR LOT 4; S 100; E 102'; 0; E 18'; N BETA MU BLDG CO 630 N DUBUQUE ST 60'; A 16'; N 90' & W 104' TO 1010207005 $ 752,710.00 THE SIGMA NU FRAT Snow Re al 2/22/2019 $ 770.00 68085 $ 770.00 IOWA CITY (ORIGINAL TOWN) W 65 E 923 E MARKET Si 1010407003 1 $ 176,350.00 COONEY, SANDRA KAY w Removal 3/14/2019 $ 175.00 68062 $ 75.00 IOWA CITY (ORIGINAL TOWN) W 65' OF E 923 E MARKET Si 10 07003 $ 176,350.00 GOONEY, SANDRA KAY Snow Removal 2/14/2019 $ 175.00 1 68084 $ 175.00 63 AMBER LN LAKESIDE ADDITION LOT 2B 102341 $ 147,260.00 GALVAN, RUBEN Snow Removal 3/12/2019 $ 190.00 68059 $ 190.00 FAIR MEADOWS ADDITION 1ST UNIT LOT 4 2113 HOLLYWOOD BLVD 1023108DD5 107,000. )0 HAIMA, STOPHER R Snow Removal 3/8/2019 $ 190.00 68052 $ 190.00 SOUTH POINTE ADDITION - PART 6 LOT 1667 HEMINGWAY W 11A 1023388002 $ 18 10.00 tw< GINA M Snow Removal 2/26/2019 $ 330.00 68091 $ 330.00 STR 11-79-6 COM SW COR NE ON GL PUBLIC HWY, E 431.5'; SE 338.6'; NE 33.25' TO R/W HWY & POB; N 112'; E 95.8'; SLY 1822 ROCHESTER AVE 51.3'; SW 21'; SWLY 62.83'; W 51.5' TO BEG 1011171001 $205,590.00 HERVI RTT Snow Removal 2/27/2019 $ 195.00 68088 $ 195.00 KARR, ALEX KARR, CHARLE 735 DEARBORN ST RUNDELL ADDITION LOT 15 BLK 9 10142 05 $ 193,320.00 KARR.MELISSA N Snow Removal 3/6/2019 $ 190.001 68007 $ 190.00 HOLLYWOOD MANORADDITION PART iSCHUETZEN INVESTME 1102 HOLLYWOOD BLVD LOT 1 & W 20' LOT 2 023231002 $ 1,140,270.00 LLC Snow Removal 2/26/2019 $ 250.00 68020 $ 250.00 IOWA CLIP (ORIGINAL TOWN) W 30' LO SCHWALM, LESLIE A 819 E MARKET ST 1010406006 $ 241,890.00 Sn Removal 2/14/2019 $ 195.00 68070 $ 185.00 OAK HILL ADDITION N 30' LOT 8 10' SIAM, LISA 525 S LUCAS ST LOT 7 1015104017 $ 181,350.00 Snow Re al 2/15/2019 $ 230.00 68072 $ 230.00 IOWA CITY (ORIGINALT N 90' LOT 5 STEYN, JAN 410 N LUCAS SL 1010162007 $ 209,920.00 Snow Remova 1(17%2019 $ 223.00 67474 $ 223.00 1048 LANGENBERG AVE SANDHILL ESTATES - RT J LOT 94 1023362003 $ 279,500.00 WANG, YUANREN Snow Removal 7/2019 $ 195.00 68087 $ 195.00 1408 DOVER ST VILLAGE GREEN H PART 1 LOT 35 1013382003 $ 181,410.00 WERLING, SARAH N Snow Removal 3(7IZW9 $ 190.00 68048 $ 190.00 IOWA CITY (9RIGINAL TOWN) E 1/2 LOT 7 WIUJAMS, JAY 322 E BLOOMINGTON Si 1010163007 $ 189,580.00 Snow Removal 3(4/2019 $ 190.00 68061 $ 190.00 IOWA CFY (ORIGINAL TOWN) E 1/2 LOT WILLIAMS, JAY 322 E BLOOMINGTON Si 1010163007 $ 189,580.00 jWflqQN RAMAR R IS"w Removal 2/16/2019 $ 77.00 68076 $ 277.00 IO CITY (ORIGINAL TOWN) E 1/2 LOT 7 WUJIAMS, JAY 322 E BLOOMINGTON ST 1010163007 $ 189,580.00 Snow Removal 2/22J2019 $ 170. 68077 $ 170.00 *)-"5' I Exhibit A --t� 15 Late ftatdouts Distributed 91-1-7 i" (Date) CITY OF IOIW ASSESSMENT SCHEDULE OF UNPAID WEED REMOVAL, SIDEWALK REPAIR, SNOW REMOVAL, STOP BOX REPAIR, AND PROPERTY CLEANUP Frozen Meters = Water Lien Parcel Appraised Service(s) Date of Cost of Balance Property Address Legal Descriptlon Number Value Property Owner Rendered Service(s) Service Invoice # Outstanding NORTH AIRPORT DEVE ENi LOTS 14 & 602 RUPPERT RD 1S 1016451011 $ 1,019,950.00 AUTOHAUS LTD Snow Removal 3/5/2019 $ 190.00 68042 $ 190.00 1220 LOUISE ST TOWNCREST ADDITION LOT 10 Bh1k6 1013334007 $ 159,850.00 BENNETT, KYLE A Snow Removal 3/4/2019 $ 190.00 68060 $ 190.00 IOWA CTIY (ORIGINAL TOWN) COM N COR LOT 4; S 100; E 102; S 50; E 18; N BETA MU BLDG CO 630 N DUBUQUE ST 60'; W 161; N 90'& W 104' TO BEG 10207005 $ 752,710.00 THE SIGMA NU FRAT Snow Removal 2/22/2019 $ 770.00 68 $ 770.00 IOWA CITY (ORIGINAL TOWN) W 65' OF E 923 E MARKET ST 1010 003 $ 176,350.00 COONEY, SANDRA KAY Snow Removal 3/14/201 75.00 68062 $ 75.00 IOWA CITY (ORIGINAL TOWN) W 65' OF E 923 E MARKET ST 101040700 $ 176,350.00 COONEY, SANDRA KAY Snow Remov /14/2019 $ 175.00 68084 $ 175.00 63 AMBER LN LAKESIDE ADDITION LOT 28 1023410001 147,26090 GALVAN, RUBEN A Soo oval 3/12%2019 $ 190.00 68059 $ 190.00 FAIR MEADOWS ADDITION ISI UNIT LOT 4 2113 HOLLYWOOD BLVD 10231080005 $ 7,00090 HAIMA, CHRISTOPHER Snow Removal 3/8/2019 $ 190.00 68052 $ 190.00 SOUTH POINTE ADDITION - PART 6 LOT 1667 HEMINGWAY LN 116 1023388002 $ 157, 0.00 HARRIS, GI Snow Removal 2/26/2019 $ 330.00 68091 $ 330.00 SIR 11-79-6 COM SW COR NE ON C/L PUBLIC HWY; E 431.5' SE 338.6'; NE 33.25' TO RJW HWY & POB; N II2'; E 95.8'; SLY 1822 ROCHESTER AVE 51.3'; SW 21'; SWLY 62.83'; W 51.5' TO BEG 1011171001 $ 29R,X90.00HER ARIT Snow Removal 2/27/2019 $ 195.00 68088 $ 195.00 KARP, A M KARR. CEA S M 735 DEARBORN ST RUNDELL ADDITION LOT 15 ELK 9 1014277 $ 193,320.00 KA MELT Snow Removal 3/6(2019 $ 190.00 65007 $ 190.00 HOLLYWOOD MANOR ADDITION PART 1 SCHUETZEN INV ENTS 1102 HOLLYWOOD BLVD LOT 1 & W 20' LOT 2 23231002 $ 1,140,270.00 LLC Snow Removal 2/26/2019 $ 250.00 68020 $ 250.00 IOWA CITY (ORIGINAL TOWN) W 30' LOT -2 SCHWALM, LESLIE A 619 E MARKET ST 1010406006 $ 241,89000 Snow Removal 2%14/2019 $ 195.00 68070 $ 185.00 OAK HILL ADDITION N 30' LOT S 10' STAM, USA 525 S LUCAS ST 1015104017 $ 181,350.00 AM ow Removal 2/15/2019 $ 230.00 68072 $ 230.00 IOWA CITY (ORIGINALT N) N 90' LOT 5 STEYN, JAN 410 N LUCAS Si 1010182007 $ 209,920.00 5no emoval 1117/2019 $ 223.00 67474 $ 223.00 1048 LANGENBERG AVE SANDHILL ESTAT - PART 3 LOT 94 1023362003 $ 279,500.00 WANG, YUANREN Snow Re oval 2/27/2019 $ 195.00 68087 $ 195.00 1408 DOVER ST VILLAGE G SOUTH PART 1 LOT 35 1013382003 $ 181,410.00 WERLING, SARAH N Snow Remo 3/7/2019 $ 190.00 68048 $ 190.00 IOWA (ORIGINAL TOWN) E 1/2 LOT WILLIAMS, .JAY 322 E BLOOMINGTON Si 1010163007 $ 189,580.00 WILSON, Snow Removal 4/2019 $ 190.00 68061 $ 190.00 I A CITY (ORIGINAL TOWN) E 1/2 LOT 7 WILLIAMS, JAY 322 E BLOOMINGTON SiBLK 57 1010163007 $ 189,580.00 WILSON. RACHAR R Snow Removal 2/1 019 $ 277.00 68076 $ 277.00 IOWA CITY (ORIGIN4L TOWN) E 1/2 LOT 7 AY WILLIAMS,WILSON.g 322 E BLOOMINGi 1010163007 $ 189,550.00 CH Snow Removal 2122120 $ 170.00 68077 $ 170.00 --t� 15 Late ftatdouts Distributed 91-1-7 i" (Date) ExhibitA -czs or 9--IZ-Iq -o15 CITY OF'P&WA CITY ASSESSMENT SCHEDULE OF UNPAID WEED REMOVAL, SIDEWALK REPAIR, SNOW REMOVAL, STOP BOX REPAIR, AND PROPERTY CLEANUP Frozen Meters = Water Lien Parcel Appraised Service(s) Date of Cost of Balance Property Address Legal Descn on Number Value Property Owner Rendered Service(s) Service -voice # Outstanding NORTH AIRPORT D11IF<Z11IT LOTS 14 & 602 RUPPERT RD SS 1016451011 $ 1,019,950.00 AUTOHAUS LTD Snow Removal 3/51201 $ 590.00 68042 $ 190.00 1220 LOUISE ST TOWNCREST ADDITION LOT BLK 6 1013334007 $ 159,850.00 BENNETT, KYLE A Snow Removal 3/ 19 $ 190.00 68060 $ 190.00 IOWA CITY (ORIGINAL TOWN) CO COR LOT 4; 5 100'; E 102'; S 50'; E 18; BETA MU BLDG CO 630 N DUBUQUE ST 60'; W 16'; N 90'& W 104' TO BEG tOI0207005 $ 752,710.00 THE SIGMA NO FEAT Sno emoval 2/22/2019 $ 770.00 68085 $ 770.00 IOWA CITY (ORIGINAL TOWN) W 65' OF E 923 E MARKET Si 1010 03 $ 176,350.00 COONEY, SANDRA KAY Snow Removal 3/14/2019 $ 175.00 68062 $ 75.00 IOWA CITY (ORIGINAL TOWN) W 65' OF E 923 E MARKET ST 197OF N i 1010407003 176,350.00 COONEY, SANDRA Snow Removal 2/14/2019 $ 175.00 68084 $ 175.00 IOWA(ORIGINAL TOWN) N 46' OF E 15 N JOHNSON ST 67* T 8 BUK 39 1010434006 $ 9,570.00 FOBRO L L Snow Removal 3/5/2019 $ 195.00 68040 $ 195.00 63 AMBER LN LAKESIDE ADDITION LOT 28 1023410001 $ 14 , 0.00 GALV , RUBEN A Snow Removal 3/12/2019 $ 190.00 68059 $ 190.00 FAIR MEADOWS ADDITION IST UNIT LOT 2113 HOLLYWOOD BLVD 1023106005 $ 107,000. RIMA, CHRISTOPHER R Snow Removal 3/5/2019 $ 190.00 68052 $ 190.00 SOUTH POINTE ADDITION - PART 6 LOT 1667 HEMINGWAY LN 1023388002 $ 187, .00 HA , GINA M Snow Removal 2/26/2019 $ 330.00 68091 $ 330.00 SIR 11-79-6 COM SW COR NE ON CIL PUBLIC HWY; E 431.5'; SE 338.6'; NE 33.25' TO R/W HWY & POB; N 112; E 95.8'; SLY 1822 ROCHESTER AVE 51.3; SW 21'; SWLY 62.83'; W 51.5' TO BEG 10111710 $ 205,590.00 HERVIG, MAR1T Snow Removal 2/27/2019 $ 195.00 68088 $ 195.00 2247 PLAEN VIEW DR TY'N CAE SUBDIV6RON PART 3 LOT 75 1020 03 $ 171,450.00 LSIS INVESTMENTS LLC Snow Removal 2%5/2019 $ 300.001 68069 $ 300.00 KARP, ALEX M KARR, CHARLES M 735 DEARBORN ST RUNDELL ADDITION LOT 15 BLK 9 1014277005 $ 193,320.00 KAR MELISSA N Snow moval 3/6/2019 $ 190.00 68007 $ 190.00 CUSTER SUBDIVISION COM NW CO NE 16-79-6; E 567.96'; S 33' TO POB- 300'; W KAVARS, NATHAN M 629 MELROSE AVE 100'; N 300'; E 100' TO POB 1016132001 $ 648,740.00 KAVARS, ANNE M Snow Removal 4/2019 $ 190.00 68063 $ 190.00 HIGHLAND DEVELOPMENT DITION LOT 1 1401 FRANKLIN Sr 1014382001 $ 206,240.00 LAKE, OBIAGELE Snow Removal 3/5 9 $ 280.00 68117 $ 280.00 HOLLYWOOD HAND DDTTION PART 1 SCHUETZEN INVESTMENTS 1102 HOLLYWOOD BLVD LOT 1 & W 20' LO 1023231002 $ 1,140,270.00 LLC Snow Removal 2/26/2019 $ 250.00 68020 $ 250.00 IOWA CITY (0 ]NAL TOWN) W 30' LOT 2 SCHWAIM, LESLIE A 819 E MARKET ST 1010406006 $ 241,890.00 Snow Removal 2/14/2019 $ .00 68070 $ 195.00 OAK HIL DDITION N 30' LOT 8 & S 10' STAM, LISA 525 S LUCAS ST LOT 7 1015104017 $ 181,350.DO BETH G Snow Removal 2/15/2019 $ 230.00, 68072 $ 230.00 !O CITY (ORIGINAL TOWN) N 90' LOT 5 STEYN, JAN 410 N LUCAS ST 1010162007 $ 209,920.00 Snow Removal 1/17/2019 $ 223.00 474 $ 223.00 CITY (ORIGINAL TOWN) E 40' LOT 2 523 CHURCH ST LK 3 1010142003 $ 210,960.00 VOLM, TIMOTHY G Snow Removal 2/26/2019 $ 260.00 6802 $ 260.00 I048 LANGENBERG g SANDHILL ESTATES - PART 3 LOT 94 1023362003 $ 279,500.00 WANG, YUANREN Snow Removal 2/27/2019 $ 195.00 68087 195.00 1408 DOVER ST VILLAGE GREEN SOUTH PART 1 LOT 35 1013382003 $ 181,410.00 WERLING, SARAH N Snow Removal 3/7/2019 $ 190.00 68048$ 190.00 IOWA CITY (ORIGINAL TOWN) E 1/2 LOT 7 WILLIAMS, JAY 322 E BLOOMINGTON Si gLK 7 1010163007 $ 159,580.00 NRA HAEL B Snow Removal 3/4/2019 $ 190.00 68061 $ 1 .00 IOWA CITY (ORIGINAL TOWN) E 112 LOT 7 WILLIAMS, JAY 322 E BLOOMINGTON ST 1010163007 Is 189,580.00 Snow Removal 2/16/2019 $ 277.00 68076 $ 277. IOWA CITY (ORIGINAL TOWN) E 1/2 LOT 7 WILLIAMS, SAY 322 E BLOOMINGTON ST IBLK 57 1010163007 1 $ 189,580.00 WTI qnN PArHAPI R Snow Removal 2/22/2019 $ 170.00 1 68077 $ 170.00 -o15