Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout10-12-2022 Parks & Recreation CommissionIowa City Parks and Recreation Commission Wednesday, October 12, 2022 5:00 p.m. I I N ,, t,II % , Robert A. Lee Community Recreation Center — Meeting Room B 220 S Gilbert St, Iowa City, IA 52240 Public Comment for each item will be limited to 3 minutes for each person and a total for no more than 30 minutes per item. Written comments submitted to parksondrecreation@iowa-city.org, prior to 5 p.m. on Monday, Oct. 10, 2022 will be distributed to the Commission via email in advance of the meeting. AGENDA ITEM 1 CALL TO ORDER ITEM 2 APPROVAL OF SEPTEMBER 14, 2022 MINUTES ITEM 3 PUBLIC DISCUSSION OF ANY ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA ITEM 4 IOWA CITY BICYCLE MASTER PLAN UPDATE — KENT RALSTON, SARAH WALZ; METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORG ITEM 5 REPORT ON ITEMS FROM CITY STAFF a) Parks & Recreation Director —Juli Seydell Johnson b) Recreation Division Superintendent — Brad Barker c) Parks Division Superintendent —Tyler Baird ITEM 6 CHAIRS REPORT ITEM 7 COMMISSION TIME/SUGGESTIONS FOR FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS ITEM 8 ADJOURN If you will need disability -related accommodations to participate in this program/event please contact Gabe Gotera, Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department at 319-356-5210 or ggotero@iowa-city.org. Early requests are strongly encouraged to allow sufficient time to meet your access needs. IOWA CITY PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION PRELIMINARY MINUTES SEPTEMBER 14, 2022 TERRY TRUEBLOOD RECREATIONAL AREA — PARK LODGE Members Present: Alex Hachtman, Brian Morelli, Missie Forbes, April Schmidt, Melissa Serenda, Brianna Wills, Connie Moore Members Absent: Boniface Penandjo Lemoupa, Christopher Odinct Staff Present: Juli Seydell Johnson, Brad Barker, Tyler Baird, Gabe Gotera Others Present: Joan Russett, Eleanor Steele, Mickie Wiegand, Anne Tabor, Mitzi Read, Jack Stapleton, Mary Teraberry, Denise Kanne, Anne Stapleton, Carin Crain, Mark Cannon, Glenda Buender, Marjie Caruth, Sharon DeGraw, Nancy Romalov, John Beaseley, Dan Katalinich, Diane Sondergard, Mary Helen Stefaniak, Susan Mellecker, Sarah Clark. CALL TO ORDER: Chairman Hachtman called the meeting to order at 5 p.m. RECOMMENDATIONS TO COUNCIL: (to become effective only after separate Council action): Moved by Wills, seconded by Forbes, to recommend to Council to move forward with City Park Pool as recommended at May 23, 2022 meeting, then based on further data and discussion address Moved by Wills, seconded by Serenda, to recommend to Council to approve the vision of all areas Hollow Park Playground Replacement' park vroiect. Passed 5-1 (Hachtman Forbes Schmidt, Wills Moore in favor: Serenda opposed) (Penandio Lemoupa Morelli & Odinet absent) OTHER FORMAL ACTION: Moved by Forbes, seconded by Serenda, to approve the August 10, 2022 minutes as written Motion passed 7-0 (Penandio Lemouva, & Odinet absent) PUBLIC DISCUSSION OF ANY ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA: None PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION May 23, 2022 Page 2 of 15 RECREATION PROGRAM & FACILITY MASTERPLAN RECOMMENDATION: ROBERT A. LEE POOL — Juli Sevdell Johnson Johnson gives a recap of the process of the Masterplan. Johnson explains that initial public input was gathered over a year, including focused outreach to underserved population, focus groups, and a statistically valid survey. These along with the public concerns received up to that point, lead to the Phase 1 recommendation for Robert A. Lee Community Recreation Center. The recommendations are that due to lower use potential high costs for renovations and changes of that facility, the recreation master plan would say that eventually, if space was provided at a different facility such as Mercer Park Aquatic Center, that it would be in the best interests to decommission the pool to be used for other recreation purposes. Johnson details various public ideas for the space such as an indoor skatepark, pickleball, or indoor court space. Other public concerns that led to the Phase 1 recommendations includes not wanting to drive downtown, not wanting to pay for parking, accessibility both into the building and through the locker rooms into the pool, and largely the general size and age of the pool. Johnson reminds that this is the third step of the Masterplan with plenty of time to take more attendance numbers. Chairman Hachtman asks for a recap of the recent additional meeting with the public. Johnson explains that City Manger, Geoff Fruin and Recreation Supt, Brad Barker met with the Save RALRC group several weeks prior. Johnson said it was decided that a better counting/attendance system would be worked out for the future that both staff at the Save RALRC group count agree on. Johnson says that after staff have compared the number of people in the pool versus the check -ins at the desk and found that the numbers are reasonably accurate. Johnson acknowledges that one or two swimmers may not be checking in, but these are regular lap swimmers as opposed to daily paid people sneaking in. Johnson states that lap swimmers in the water are still being counted at varied times in the day but reminds that this is not related to the overall use of the pool. Johnson continues that the lap swim count derived from discussion with the public on how many lap swimmers there were and if there were enough lap lanes. Johnson notes the importance of other summer factors to consider, such as seeing how lap swimmer numbers change with the seasonal closing of City Park Pool and Coralville pool being closed all summer. Johnson states that Aqua Fitness counts, swim lesson counts, and special event counts are tracked separately due to the resources involved. Johnson acknowledges that the Aqua Fitness count will have to evolve as many Aqua Fitness users have switched from enrolling in classes to purchasing monthly fitness passes. Johnson explains that the Masterplan has varied estimates and not specific costs as the numbers are based on estimates from the architects and the pool consultants, recent projects, and other estimates gathered along the way. Johnson continues that numbers for MPAC renovation are being around the nine -million -dollar range and that the RALRC renovations being somewhere between four and five million -dollars. Johnson reminds that these number are not toward remedial repairs to that would keep the pool operating but towards a fully function long term investment. Commissioner Wills asks to hear on the concern that there won't be enough space at MPAC as far as lap swimming. Johnson replies that while the plan would not add lap lanes, it does add a warm water fitness pool with shallow and possibly deep -water space that would pull other swimmers out of the lap lanes, making more room. Johnson explain that the specific numbers for the actual size of pools would be determined in the next phase of design and that therefore a lap swimmer specific count is being kept. Wills asks for confirmation that this is a general layout, with a specific design coming next phase, which would include how many lanes could be opened with the warm water addition. Johnson confirms that and says that the number of lap lanes is a question heard during earlier aquatics planning, Wills says that there seems to be a disconnect with the public not knowing that the designs proposed are very general in their layout. Johnson says that all the currently presented designs were made from Phase 1 input and are not at all a final design and that actual construction is years down the line after more public processes. Johnsons explains that the recommend plan is for CPP construction to start in 2025, after such public processes will PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION May 23, 2022 Page 3 of 15 begin for MPAC renovations, followed again by public processes for RAL. Johnson says that with this timeline a lot of data can be recorded to look at attendance along the way. Commissioner Forbes acknowledges that from the beginning of planning, staff and consultants have been very intentional on collecting data, as all the plan are derived of feedback from both people who use the facilities but also from those who don't to see how the facilities can be used in different ways. Commissioner Serenda inquires on the reduced pool hours at RALRC and how this is considered when comparing usage. Johnson responds that the hours are limited based on of past years having a low number of swimmers in at specific times of the day. Johnson continues that this is something staff is always re- evaluating and that if numbers rise to a sufficient level, then the afternoon hours could be returned. Johnsons says that in the evenings at RALRC there are swim lesson, while the evenings at MPAC have a swim team which come to similar usage there. Johnson does not recommend adding more hours at the current time. Commissioner Wills asks if the issue with adding more hours is regarding the cost of lifeguards. Johnson replies that that the concern is if there are enough lifeguards. Johnson brings up that Iowa City, Coralville, North Liberty, and the University are finding it tough to find lifeguards in the current job environment. When looking at how the guards can be used the most efficiently, the solution is to look at which pool has the most usage and needs more lifeguard coverage. Johnsons says that based on the numbers at the time, Mercer was determined to be the most used. Commissioner Moore recognizes that there is a lot of time to look at RALRC usage but asks if there is a stop point that the counting is done. Johnson replies that it's largely up to the commission or the council. Johnson explains that the MPAC & RALRC projects do not have funding yet, which is why the CPP will be the first to receive renovations in 2025, so a few more years of data will be gathered. Commissioner Morelli asks what the plan is for funding the major projects. Johnson states that the CPP project is already in the capitol improvement plan for FY25. Johnson continues that the MPAC & Scanlon Gym project is much greater than what the city could bond, so it would likely go towards fundraising, bond sales, or referendum. Johnson says that if the RALRC project is around $700,000 in projects, then that would be within bonding capabilities. If it goes into the millions, then different funding plan would need to be found. Johnson finishes that the only committed project is for CPP. Commissioner Serenda asks on the possibility of a partnership with either the University or Coralville Parks and Recreations to consolidate the metro area facilities and resources. Johnson says that there is not a specific interagency agreement but that often these organizations are sharing part time staff. Johnson explains that part time city staff are capped at 25 hours a week, so many lifeguards and customer service staff also work at either the university or with Coralville. Commissioner Wills asks if there has been discussion with the Iowa City School district on partnership for facility use. Johnson confirms that the school district is already partnered with MPAC and that they give so much money each year towards capitol funding for MPAC. Johnsons says that as discussions happen on the need for a new elementary or middle school, it may be worked out on what their needs are for outdoor/indoor space. Johnsons explains that this has a hand in the masterplan looking at a Recreation Facility on the west side of Iowa City. Commissioner Wills asks what kind of motion would be happening for this Item. Johnsons say that the Commission has several options to choose from, they could move forward with the plan as presented in its's draft form, they could choose to not recommend to approve the plan, or they could recommend to PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION May 23. 2022 Page 4 of 15 approve the plan but with their own caveats. Wills brings up that with the current plan, after CPP is finished, MPAC would be looked at followed by RAL. Wills thinks that RALRC and MPAC should be switched to not limit the options at MPAC by having RALRC decided after the fact. Johnsons suggest that the commission could reevaluate the status of MPAC and RALRC after CPP is finished, and use data gathered between now and then to determine the order of the two projects. Commissioner Wills moves that after the CPP project, the specific plans for MPAC and RALRC would be determined using data gathered up to that point. This is seconded by Commissioner Forbes initializing public discussion. Chairman Hachtman makes the clarification that CPP Phase 1 recommendations was approved at a prior meeting and is only being used as a time marker for the motion on the floor. Johnson adds that the design and development for CPP would not be finalized until late 2024 which gives lots of time for input to be gathered. Anne Stapleton says that staff need to consider three changes this month to truly consider the value of the RALRC pool. Stapleton's first item is for hours to be added to RALRC pool to be more equitable with MPAC pool. If the pool is open for longer, then more people will use it. Stapleton's second item is for staff to inform the public of changes. If changes in the schedule aren't promoted, then how is the public to know that the schedule has changed. Stapleton's third point is to hire more lifeguards at RAL. Stapleton says that she polled close to a dozen lifeguards and a majority said that they prefer a full morning or afternoon since they need the money. Stapleton continues that lifeguards prefer the location of RALRC over MPAC as most are college students. Stapleton closes referring to a petition signed by over a thousand Iowa City citizens who want RALRC pool to remain open. Carin Crain refers to the Gather Here Phase 2 Survey which asked, "To what extend do you feel shifting all indoor aquatics to Mercer would better serve the community's aquatic needs" to which 68.7% said "unfavorable". Crain refers to petitions signed by 1,163 Iowa City that oppose closing RALRC pool and asks the commission to consider the input before choosing to close RALRC pool. Crain asks what sort of usage would support maintaining Robert A. Lee pool. Crain continues that on August 221 there were 22 people in the pool. Madie Caruth, as interpreted by Carin Crain says that there is an issue of scheduling. Caruth says that one part of MPAC pool is closed from 5:30-7:30 for the Iowa City Eels practice. This time coincides with swim lessons at RAL. Caruth continues that if all these people were to swim in one location at the same time then where would the lap swimmers and other families go. Caruth refers to the Gather Here survey which found that 91 % of people who responded wanted all children to have the ability to swim, saying that closing RALRC would not support this goal. On the topic of equity, Caruth says that staff have said that they have numbers on diversity and who swims where. Caruth makes a specific request to see this data as well as for accurate counting. Caruth says people aren't checking in and that she volunteers to check in with her swim pass but that anybody could just walk by. Jack Stapleton addresses concerns raised at the last Commission meeting about the aggressive nature of the friends of the Iowa City Pool group and how comments the group made could be construed to be offensive to public servants. Stapleton says that as a supporter of said group, the approach is not intended to be offensive, but that they are only seeking the truth regarding inconsistencies between comments made by the Parks and Recreation department and the written report of the consulting group. Stapleton specifically points out pages of the report that that were identified in a letter sent to council on August 81 from Friends of RALRC Pool. Stapleton says that the group has not had a specific response directly addressing the questions. Stapleton addresses a 21d concern of inaccurate data made from incomplete counting methods. Stapleton states that any study relying on inaccurate data cannot be relied on. Stapleton PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION May 23, 2022 Page 5 of 15 concludes saying that closing RALRC is not consistent with the consultants' report and that very specific questions asked to staff regarding costs and usage have received no response. Marc Cannon shows a spreadsheet with a count for pool users from September 1" to September 14"'. Cannon explains that this data is recorded by people who go to the pool and that with 29 data points, the numbers are in the range of 21-22, with a low of 2 on only a single data point. Cannon refers to comments from staff that numbers seen range 0-2, which Cannon does not see when counting people in the pool, apples to apples. Cannon encourages the commission to read all the data and documents from the city to have all the information. Sharon DeGraw states that the RALRC pool needs updating, as it is in poor visual state. DeGraw says that if the pool is invested in and promoted better, that it will get people coming, DeGraw suggests adding a slide to RALRC to encourages kids to swim there during the winter season. Degraw comments that if CPP is made to be a family friendly location for young children that it would not be sought by teenagers. Susan Mellecker refers to the Phase 2 survey feedback that shows that 68.7% of respondents do not want indoor aquatics to be centralized at MPAC. Mellecker states Director Johnsons having said in a September 711 memo that "The voices of non -users" in the statically valid survey are really the most accurate information considering the views of the entirecommunity. Mellecker says that even if Phase 2 data were to be ignored over Phase 1, then the top priorities according to Berry Dunn are pool programs, water fitness, lap swimming, senior aquatics programs, and swimming lessons. Mellecker continues that if these are priorities, then why would the city propose a plan to close a pool which already accommodates warm water activities and completely redesign CPP which would reduce the number of lap lanes from 34 to 19. Mellecker refers to Director Johnson stating that the University of Iowa CRWC pool is an alternative for community members should the pool close but says the CRWC was not built as a community recreation center as seen in their pricing of $87 per month per person for non-UI affiliated individuals. Mellecker refers to the Berry Dunn top priorities of indoor walking and jogging track, weight room, fitness room, and yoga studio and asks if the community is told to go to the CRWC for these as well. Nancy Romalov is a lifelong swimmer, a competitive master swimmer, and a certified to teach swimming. Romalov states that each pool serves different population, which Romalov says is a positive. Romalov says that MPAC and RALRC have very different clientele and very different needs. Romalov points out that 1/3 Americans adults don't know how to swim, and that programs offered toa adults have seen a huge increase because of pools like RAL. Romalov closes, saying that `If you build it, they will come." Romolov sees RALRC as a perfect venue for a robust swimming program. Mickie Wiegand has been involved with water aerobics for more than 20 years, fist as a student, then a teacher, then again as a student. Wiegand recounts how deep -water aerobics helped her to recover from a bicycle accident through low/no impact exercise. Wiegand says that deep -water aerobics is safe and important for aging bones and joints and can be vital for someone with a joint replacement. Wiegand remembers teaching a class of 12 or more at 5:30 in the evening and that reduced RALRC hours can have an impact on attendance numbers. Wiegand states that having the opportunity to participate in deep -water aerobics at RALRC has allowed seniors to form a community of their own to help maintain their health and wellbeing. Wiegand says that the plans at MPAC would not accommodate these needs. Mary Ellen Stefaniak says that she did not know how to swim at 40 years old in 1991 but since then she has been swimming at RALRC for over 30 years. Stefniak recalls in 1991, when the only time that she had to swim was in the morning before driving her child to school. Stefaniak states if she had to drive to MPAC to swim in that time frame, she would not have time to swim at all. Stefaniak says that time PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION May 23, 2022 Page 6 of 15 involved for the people getting to the pool must be considered, and that without RALRC she would not be able to swim. Dan Katalinich states that in 1968, a smaller Iowa City decided that it needed a third pool and reinforces that point. Katalinich says that if there was a need for a third pool, then it is beyond crazy to be closing the pool most centrally located and accessible and affordable of the city pools. Katalinich says as the past president of the Iowa City Eels swim club, that the eels take up a lot of time and space at MPAC, and that when there was a swim meet, the whole facility would be closed. Katalinich says that between ICE and the school district having meets, a lot of hours will be taken up at MPAC. John Beasley states that 30 years prior he was in the Commission's seat with Terry Trueblood and Mike Moran. Beasley gives context saying also was involved with the basketball courts at Mercer Park, served on the board of directors at the Ronald McDonald House, served as the direct of the Public Library and is now on the Harvest Preserve board. Beasley says this to express that he has been in the seat of the commission. Beasley says that listening to comments, it seems that there is a distrust that has developed between many individuals and the process. Beasley continues that if users of RALRC pool are using their own time to count the number of swimmers in the pool, because they don't trust the stats coming from the city, then that's a concern. Beasley voices that it's a concern seeing professors at the university getting cut off mid -sentence because they speak slightly past 2 minutes. Beasley challenges staff to work to re- establish the trust between the consumers of the product and the City of Iowa City. Johnson clarifies several points. Regarding the request to add back RALRC pool hours, Johnson says that once usage numbers go up, then hours would return. Johnson encourages higher attendance at the pools. On the topic of hiring lifeguards, Johnson states that although some lifeguards may say they want more hours. management must be efficient in the use of staff and make their decisions on where the most use is. Johnson addresses the public comment in the report, pointing out that many comments referred to are from Phase 2. Johnson says that this is not to discount the Phase 2 comments but that Phase 1 Specifically went out into communities to do outreach to diverse groups, all areas of the community, all incomes. Phase 2 comments are extremely important moving forward, but it does not have the statistic validity of Phase 1. Johnson states that counting lap swimmers began after public concerns expressed need specially for lap lanes. Johnson clarifies that the aqua fitness attendance is not included with the lap swim count but can range from 2 people to 18 for that one hour. Johnson acknowledges that MPAC pool closes for swim meet but brings up that the proposed plans would add a second pool available which in the vision would be for swim lessons and aqua finesses. While this does not answer questions on lap swimming, it would provide a pool space that is not taken over by swim clubs. Johnson addresses the questions on diversity, referred to the heatmaps done by Berry Dunn that showed staff where residents are coming from for programs. Johnson responds to the question about customer service staff not checking in patrons, saying that it's often the regular swimmer coming in, chatting, not checking in. Johnson expresses that pool users need to check in to keep the numbers accurate. In response to comments about the aggressive nature of the group, Johnsons says that she does not remember this and is unsure of what this is referring to. PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION May 23, 2022 Page 7 of 15 Johnson says to the group that says there have been no staff responses to questions, that this is because the Save RALRC group asked staff not to respond in writing, specifically that there was too much confusion in prior written information. For this reason, staff have scheduled a second meeting with the Save RALRC group to sit down and answer these questions. Johnson says that anything that would have been sent is included in the agenda packet tonight, which is publicly available Johnson responds to comments on the need to update RALRC pool and add slides. Johnsons agrees that RALRC pool needs updating, but the fact of how much updating the pool and locker rooms need. and the cost associated is the issue at hand. Johnson says on the subject of the University Pool being an option, that it truly is an option. Johnson says it's not out of the question to look into subsidize passes or something similar in the future. Johnson does note that the use of the three pools in Iowa City has changed since the university has built a pool. On the comment that each pool serves a different population, Johnson agrees. Johnson says that starting in 2016, the department had a vision of every child learning how to swim. Johnson explains how kids are bussed in from locations like the Catholic workers house or the south district neighborhood centers and are given free swim lesson with swimsuits and transportation provided if needed. Johnson acknowledges that many of these programs happened at RALRC right now because that's where the space is. Johnsons elaborates that the plan proposed says that those uses can be better served in a new facility design for those specific things at MPAC. Regarding questions on the Deep -Water Fitness classes, Johnson agrees that any design discussion for any replacement pool needs room for deep water as Deep -Water Fitness attendance has increased. Johnson acknowledges that there are also a number of people aqua running in the deep -water section in the last month or two. Commissioner Moore asks, with so many numbers coming in for attendance, what is the threshold for the pool to be determined full and viable? Johnson says that currently pool attendance could be close to full for a few hours out of the week but even if a full water fitness class is using the diving well, there may be only 2 people using the lap lanes. The full use of the pool can depend on the mix of the uses. Overall, Johnson says that until more than one person in each lap lanes, then the pool would not be full. Johnson explains that when individual swimmers each have a lap lane, that can be great for the swimmers, but it is not an efficient use of aquatic space. Commissioner Moore asks to confirm that there isn't a specific cutoff number. Johnson says that if through the day people were sharing lap lanes, then that would be full. Commissioner Morelli asks if staff can look at numbers now and say that there is low usage, then what would be adequate usage. Johnson responds that she is not prepared to give a certain number as it is a combination of how the two pools are being utilized at the same time. Commissioner Wills asks that if RALRC pool was open for more hours, then wouldn't there be increased usage? Wills addresses the impact of the cost of Lifeguards and the number of lifeguards needed per hour and inquires the possibility of a trial period to keep the pool open max hours and get a `legitimate' count to get a valid comparison. Johnsons responds that prior to reducing RALRC pool hours staff had been comparing the data of both facilities over a timespan of one year, pre -pandemic. Staff had originally thought it would be MPAC that would close for a few hours a day and were surprised to see that the data made it obvious that there was almost no swimmer at RALRC during the afternoons and during that window of time in the morning. Johnson states that they stand by this decision and suggests that a decision could be reevaluated when the semesters change again, at which point staff could be lured if data gathered between now and then support that. In response, Will asks if seasonal changes in attendance PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION May 23, 2022 Page 8 of 15 were considering when looking over the data. Johnson confirms that factor was looked at comprehensively and that the decision to reduce hours predates the Master Plan. Commissioner Serenda asks, when consistent and accurate counts of RALRC usage are compiled. how the numbers are going to be shown and be interpreted going forward. Johnsons responds that that answer would be most accurate, after the meeting with the Save RALRC group later in the month. Johnson says that in the end it will likely be a headcount of how many swimmers are there for programs and which are not there for programs. Johnson explains that the difference must be determined as programs require instructors and other resources. Johnson adds that spot checks will be continued by staff other than customer service or lifeguards, to ensure accuracy in the numbers. Commissioner Wills addresses that the junior high and high schools will still be swimming at MPAC but brings up that the Iowa City Eels swim club may not exist soon. Wills ask if this would have an influence on the accessibility as far as timing for other groups. Johnson states that she cannot comment on the status of ICE but does point out the fluid nature of the pool use and how programming is always changing schedules. Commissioner Morelli asks for clarification on the current motion if the vote is determining if the pool will close. Johnson explains that there will be future public processes on several parts on the plan, including a 2nd process for CPP, a new public process for adult fitness needs at MPAC, and another process for RAL. Johnson continues that the plan states the recommendations based on estimated cost and current usage numbers but that there is still a full process before any final decision. Johnons says that what can be seen is a vision that there is a certain amount of indoor pool space and that the plan is saying to potentially move to MPAC rather then RAL, but that there are checkpoints along the way to change that decision. Johnson states that the commission can move to go through the RALRC process before the MPAC process. Commissioner Morelli speaks in favor of the motion but asks that in the future more choices of how to move forward with RALRC be provided. Morelli acknowledges the importance of the downtown location but is not fully convinced either way that the recreation center needs a pool or that it needs to close its pool. Park Aquatic Center. Passed 7-0 (Penandio Lemoupa, & Odinet absent) RECREATION PROGRAM & FACILITY MASTERPLAN RECOMMENDATION: MERCER/SCANLON RECREATION CENTER — Juli Sevdell Johnson Johnson explain that the Item is looking at overall facility changes at MPAC, including the wane water pool, the locker rooms, the lobby/entrance, the staff office area, the gymnasium/walking track, and other adult fitness amenities. Johnson continues that the motion for this item would be if the commission is willing to move forward with these long-term changes after CPP is done. Moved by Wills, seconded by Serenda to recommend to Council to prioritize CPP, followed by the consideration of any major renovation to RAL, then followed by consideration of MPAC. PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION May 23, 2022 Page 9 of 15 Commissioner Moore voices concern with the motion as the Commission has not heard from MPAC users. Commissioner Forbes adds that she would like to see a discussion of which facility would be a priority after City Park Pool. Forbes continues that moving with finality is an issue when discussion would begin in 2025 when a different set of commissioners would be looking over the plan. between RALRC and MPAC. Chairman Hachtman explains to the audience that a motion has not been passed but only discussed and amended. Commissioner Wills asks for clarification on if the Item is regarding the pool or the rest of the facility. Johnson clarifies that the plan would be towards changes including the walking track, the gym, and the adult fitness amenities. Wills responds that she would be happy to move forward with an additional gym and a walking track at MPAC, if the decision of pool changes are not what is being discussed. Johnson asks for confirmation that the motion in hand is to move forward with MPAC renovations except for the pools discussion which will coincide with later RALRC pool discussions. Commissioner Wills confirms that she would make that motion to not halt up other parts of the plan. Susan Mellecker states that she would want the motion to remove the pool from the master plan. Mellecker says that many complain about the difficulty of parking downtown but points out that MPAC being near South East Junior High would create a bottle neck of traffic immediately before and after the school day. Mellecker compares the difference of RALRC to MPAC to the difference of a Buddhist retreat to a Catholic church basement potluck. Mellecker brings up the City's goal of reduce carbon emissions by 55% yet moving indoor swimming to MPAC would cause many to drive to MPAC. Mellecker continues that if people take the bus, downtown, they have an additional stop to reach MPAC, causing more difficulty with transportation. Mellecker says that from an accessibility perspective, the walk from the RALRC parking lot to pool is shorter than the walk from the MPAC parking lot to pool. Anne Tabor brings up the growing population of pickleball players and one of the proposed changes to the RALRC pool to turn it into pickleball courts. Tabor recommends that instead of making a warm water therapy pool at MPAC that Tabor does not want to swim in, to make an indoor pickleball courts in the same space. Carin Crain says that Julie had mentioned that people who responded to Phase 2 were the users, but Crain finds this not to be her experience. Crain continues that the 20 people in attendance in support of not centralizing aquatics at MPAC, did not indicate that they were part of the Phase 2 responses. Crain states that of the community that responded, almost 70% said that they did not want it. Crain says that if no one from the MPAC community is advocating for the changes then they must not want it. Crain articulates that she does not understand what the pool usage is being determined against and asks what the target numbers are for a fully used pool to be determined viable. Mickie Wiegand asks if the initial survey and plans mentioned the topic of closing one of the pools. Johnson responds that the fast survey had asked people in general terns, "what would make Iowa City Parks and Recreation services and facilities better?" It did not ask about closing the pool because that was not the intent of the plan, it was the outcome of Phase 1 input. Johnson continues that the Phase 2 input, does not have the same statistically validity, or outreach to underserved groups that Phase 1 had. Commissioner Schmidt makes the point that while a lot of input and comments have been gathered from people opposed to RALRC pool closing, which is encouraged for people to speak their mind on what they PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION May 23, 2022 Page 10 of 15 do or do not want, it needs to be kept in mind that if people are happy with the proposed plans at MPAC then they are likely not to be showing up to the meeting when things are going their way. Commissioner Moore asks for clarification that the motion is not to centralize indoor swimming. Chairman Hachtman confurns that the discussion for the pools of MPAC and RALRC would be later when more data is compiled. Commissioner Serenda asks to hear more on about the accessibility of MPAC. Serenda mentions that she had lived in the area and that is has one access point, which is hard to get in and out when there is an excess of traffic. Serenda believes that if the facility is to be built into a large useful recreation destination then the traffic pinch point needs to be considered. Johnson responds that the short-term plan, unrelated to the present discussion, is to have two-way traffic through the parking lot, which is currently a one way. Johnson says there can be high traffic before and after the South East Junior High school day, but it does not impede the times of higher facility use. Commissioner Wills comments that the road at the mouth of Bradford has been widened to accommodate the tight driveway. Commissioner Schmidt adds that there is a second entrance into the parking lot. Commissioner Forbes asks if there more diversity at MPAC due to the walkability of the residents. Johnson responds that there is a lot of diversity seen at MPAC due to its proximity to South East Junior High, this being based on visual observations for after school use of the overall facility. Johnson continues that MPAC is the preferred facility of neighbors in the area, just as RALRC is preferred by people closer to downtown. Moved by Wills, seconded by Serenda, to recommend to Council to approve the vision of all areas shown for the MPAC Master Plan, with the exception of the aquatics portion. The aquatics section will be reevaluated alongside RALRC pool facilities at a later time after CPP renovations. Passed 6- 0 (Penandio Lemoupa, Morelli. & Odinet absent) HAPPY HOLLOW PARK BALLFIELD — Juli Seydell Johnson Johnson explains that the question regarding Happy Hollow Park as put forth by City Council Member, John Thomas, was asking for the baseball diamond to be returned to its previous state, a skinned/aglime/gravel infield. Johnson details that at the 2019 public input meeting, Parks staff found that there were requests for an open space soccer field, and with low use of the actual baseball field, staff chose to change it to a grass infield. The most popular use of the ball field was for the city T-Ball program which typically use grass infields. Since then, several local residents have said that they would like for it to be returned to the skinned infield. Johnson says that the staff recommendation would be to keep it grass to be the most equitable across all city neighborhoods. Commissioner Wills asks how this would be related to the maintenance of the fields, such as using no weed killers. Wills mentions that some members of the community didn't like the feel of the field with dandelions growing. Johnson says that the move towards less chemicals in the fields/parks was in 2015- 2016. Johnson continues that the maintenance of the field was difficult for staff since it is a standalone field with very low use. To maintain the aglime field, specific equipment and staff had to be transported once a week, 40 minutes both ways. The grass field can be maintained by regular park staff on a more common basis. Johnson says that Happy Hollow Park itself is scheduled for a new playground in 2024, which may be the best time for a recommendation to change the infield as the ground will already be getting distrubed. PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION May 23, 2022 Page 11 of 15 Commissioner Wills moves to keep the field as is with consideration given to the 2024 planning year, when additional park innovations including the playground will be discussed. Sarah Clark states that Happy Hollow Park gets lots of use for things such as ball games, soccer, picnics, basketball, and kite flying. Clark continues that prior to the removal of the infield, Happy Hollow was the only neighborhood ball field in Iowa City. Clark says that the city metric of use by permits does not consider the everyday use of the field. Clark quotes Zac Wedemeyer, founder of Tap Root; "I think the ball field is a valuable part of the intermediate neighbor and all of the Iowa City area in general. In normal, non -distancing times, the park is used every spring, summer and fall evening by people, including baseball and softball teams, both formal and informal, and both kids and adults. In my younger days, my college friends and I played softball at Happy Hollow multiple times a week. Many years later, my own children, their friends, and I have used the ball diamond countless times providing practice, pickup games, and even invisible baseball. As a little league coach, it was clear there was no surplus of baseball fields in our area. It was often in difficult to find a free diamond to hold practice, I'm sure other coaches have similar experiences." Clark says that the survey done in 2019, no question was asked about infield removal. Clark continues that in the 38 responses to surveys done in August, 25 responses asked for the skinned infield to return. Sharon DeGraw says that she goes to the park every day and that prior to the grass infield, there was lots of use. DeGraw states that people were not paying the $25 fee to use the field but often there were two teams playing each other, or one team practicing. DeGraw says that there is a often a problem of not enough fields in Iowa City, with DeGraw's family driving to Weber to find a baseball field that was skinned and had an electricity outlet for a pitching machine. DeGraw advocates for the skinned field to return and for the addition of an electricity outlet. Dave Moore asks what the cost was for staff to go to Happy Hollow once a week to maintain. Johnson answers that numbers are listed in the agenda packet and can be shown to Dave Moore after the meeting. Dave Moore asks the commission to not postpone the decision until 2024 for the sake of expediency. Commissioner Wills makes the clarification that the motion is not made from expediency but to avoid tearing up the park ground more than necessary. Commissioner Forbes echoes this chain of thought. Commissioner Serenda asks if the intention to deskin the infield was conveyed to the public in the original project. Johnson explains that the decision to deskin the infield was a result of input gathered at the Public Input Open House. Johnson continues that while the question was not specifically asked to the public if they would like a skinned or grass infield in the neighborhood, this was not a question asked for similar fields at James Allen McPherson Park, Willow Creek ark, Court Hill Park, or Mercer Park. Serenda asks if the other locations had grass infields or whole time or if they were converted. Johnson answers that they have been grass the whole time. Commissioner Moore asks that if the field was skinned if there would be an issue of maintenance. Johnson explains that there would be a need for additional maintenance, and while there would be a higher cost associated, that can be made to happen Sharon DeGraw speaks up, but Chairman Hachtman explains that public discussion on the Item is over. DeGraw says something more to which Johnson responds that the Commission follows the same rules as City Council. Sharon DeGraw's comments were inaudible as she spoke from the audience not from the microphone. PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION May 23, 2022 Page 12 of 15 Commissioner Serenda asks if there are opportunities for the community to help with maintenance, or if that is influence by liability. Johnson says that the community is always able to help if they are interested. Commissioner Wills adds that near her local park, the community plants flowers, and helps with weeds and mulch to help the appearance of the park. Sarah Clark speaks up from the audience but is inaudible. Commissioner Wills asks for clarification on the timeline that the commission would look over the 2024 Playground Project. Johnson explains that the commission would look over recommendations in late 2023. Moved by Wills, seconded by Forbes, to recommend to Council to keen and maintain the Happy Hollow Park Ballfield as is until it can be reevaluated when discussion begins for the FY24' `Happv _Hollow Park Playground Replacement' park project. Passed 5-1 (Hachtman, Forbes Schmidt Wills, Moore in favor: Serenda opposed) (Penandio Lemoupa, Morelli. & Odinet absent) REPORT ON ITEMS FROM CITY STAFF 11:56:38 Parks & Recreation Director — Judi Sevdell Johnson Peddle Paddle: Johnson details a region -wide grant, Pedal Paddle, that has been sent to the Destination Iowa Grant Program. Pedal Paddle is focused to improve facilities along the river with renovations including trails projects, the skate park, the pump track, the Sturgis Ferry boat ramp, and kayak -canoe launch points. Commissioner Wills asks much the grant asking for. Johnson explains that the grant includes components from the City of Coralville and Johnson County, with City of Iowa City having roughly a third of the grant. Recreation Division Superintendent — Brad Barker City Park Pool: Barker remarks that with the transition into the fall season, City Park Pool has closed. The last day was the Dog Paddle Event which along with the entire season had a wonderful turnout. Farmers' Market: Barker says that the Farmer's Market is doing well and just recently had its' 501 Anniversary, receiving great attendance. The Market's upcoming event is the Kid's Market, which in the past has also been well attended. Upcoming Events: Barker details several upcoming events for Recreation Programming. The Try Fishing Derby is brand new event in Lower City Park. The Science and Technology House Party is an annual no - charge event hosted at the Robert A. Lee Community Recreation Center. There will be eight different Halloween events happening during October, including a Halloween Carnival with a sensory friendly hour prior to opening. Recreation Staff: Barker announces the Recreation Program Supervisor position looking over Adaptive and Inclusive Recreation and outreach programs has recently been filled. PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION May 23, 2022 Page 13 of 15 Parks Division Superintendent — Tyler Baird Project Progress: Baird details the progress on several park projects. The Ped Mall playground is currently being installed. The Court Hill Park playground has been installed but further site work is still needed. The Court Hill Park Shelter shipment is expected to arrive within the month. Site work at Chadek Green Park is done but staff are waiting on the shipment for restroom parts. Baird announces that the Whispering Meadows Playground has been recently been shipped recently, with staff waiting on the arrival to install. Forestry: Baird explains that there are several new planting projects, of which includes a large portion of the South District, and smaller sections on Kennedy Parkway and a Prairie du Chien. Baird announces that the division has just received a $10,000 grant through the Community Forestry Grant through the Department of Natural Resources. The grant will be used to plant 67 trees in Riverfront Crossings Park on October 151 at 9:00 a.m. The local Rotary Club is lined up to assist with the RFX planting. Commissioner Wills asks about the progress on the Ped Mall playground. Johnson explains that the construction crew have run into expecting issues with the underground footing. Johnson says that currently, the project is expected to finish in 2-3 weeks. Commissioner Wills asks about the planting of trees on Scott Blvd. followed by a removal of the trees. Baird explains that it is the responsibility of the contractor to remove any trees that did not survive, with approximately 30% having died. Baird continues that staff chose to remove the trees now rather than leave the trees in a dead state all summer. Some trees have already been replaced but many still need to be. Chairman Hachtman inquires on Whispering Meadows, asking if there is a community event planned for after the playground installation. Johnson explains that ribbon cuttings were typical in the past but fell away during COVID, due to lack of attendance. Johnson expects the project to finished sometime in Spring of 2023 and would be open to an event such as Rec n' Roll for the reintroduction. Chairman Hachtman is excited for the planting at RFX but asks about the plan regarding watering. Baird explains that the variety and size of the trees have been considered. Baird continues that trees in the past have been too large and have an increase change of transplant shock. To combat this, the trees will be not too big and will have water bag around them with would be included with the grant. Commissioner Serenda inquires on Whispering Meadows, asking if there are still plans to replant trees in the area, updating the quality of the park. Baird details that the REAP grant is still in progress, with most of the invasive species having been removed, allowing intended species to have a better chance going forward. CHAIRS REPORT: Chairman Hachtman reports that the Tree Advisory Committee is recently, reviewing the current tree planting processes. Hachtman takes the time to thank Commissioner Serenda for serving on said committee and for the work put forward by Baird and his staff. COMMISSION TIME/SUGGESTIONS FOR FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS: PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION May 23, 2022 Page 14 of 15 Commissioner Forbes asks if there is any update on the Ashton Butler house. Johnson explains that the council has not addressed since they were given information. Commissioner Schmidt voices the importance of having people speak up for others at the meeting but also says to keep in mind that when things are going right for people that there are less likely to say something due to a lack of complaint. Schmidt explains that this could be the reason for a lack of voice from Mercer pool users as things are going their way. Chairman Hachtman expresses excitement for the Pedal Paddle grant and would like to learn more about trail systems in the community and other goals for sustainability in the future. Moved by Moore, seconded by Schmidt, to adiourn the meeting at 7:12 a.m. Motion Passed 6-0 (Penandio Lemoupa, Morelli, Odinet absent) PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION May 23, 2022 Page 15 of 15 PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION ATTENDANCE RECORD NAME TERM EXPIRE S Steve Bird 12/31/21 X X X NM Missie 12/31/25 * * * * X NM X X O/E X X X Forbes Brian Morelli 12/31/25 * * * * X NM O/E X X X O/E X Alex 12/31/24 X X X NM X NM X X X X X X Hachtman Connie 12/31/25 * * * * * * * * * * X X Moore Christopher 12/31/24 X X X NM X NM X O/E X O/E X O/E Odinet Boniface 12/31/23 X O O NM X NM X O OX O O/E O/E Penandjo Lemou a Ben Russell 12/31/21 X X X NM April 12/31/22 X O O/E NM O/E NM O/E X X X O/E X Schmidt Melissa 12/31/23 X X X NM X NM X X X X X X Serenda Angie Smith 12/31/21 X X X NM Brianna 12/31/22 X O/E O/E NM O/E NM X X X X X X Wills Michelle 12/31/25 * * * * X NM X O/E Wiegand KEY: X = Present O = Absent O/E = Absent/Excused NM = No meeting LQ = No meeting due to lack of quorum * = Not a member now Iowa City Parks & Recreation Commission Packet October 2022 Upcoming Events • Iowa City Farmers Market; Saturdays, May through October; 7.30 am - Noon • Halloween Movie in the Park: Coco; October 14, Mercer Park, 6 pm activities, 7 pm movie • Cabin Campfire Freak Out; October 15, Upper City Park Cabins, 8-10 pm • Haunted Nature Walk; October 15, South Hickory Hill, 8-10 am • Sensory Friendly Halloween Carnival; October 21, RALCRC, 4-5 pm • Halloween Carnival; October21, RALCRC, 5:30-7.30 pm • Yoga in the Park: Saturday, October 15, 9:30-10:15 am, College Green Park • Floating Pumpkin Patch; October 22, RALCRC Pool, 11 am and 12:30 pm • Inclusive/Adaptive Halloween Bash & Dance; October22, RALCRC, 6-8 pm • Two Sentence Spooky Stories; October22, Ned Ashton House, 8-10 pm • Roller Skating Costume Party; October 29, RALCRC, 2-4:30 pm and 5:30-7.30 pm • Tot Monster Mash; October 31, MPAC, 9:30-11:30 am • Holiday Market; November 12, RALCRC, 8 am —1 pm Notable from Parks & Recreation Staff Parks: • Construction of the Pedestrian Mall playground is still scheduled to finish this fall but has had delays related to the manufacturing of some of the components. • Tree planting is picking back up for fall with plantings for multiple contracts as well as staff plantings occurring throughout the fall. • A tree planting project is organized for October 15th to add trees to Riverfront Crossings Park. A DNR grant has been received to cover the costs of the 67 trees and Rotary volunteers are organizing to assist with the planting. • Construction continues at Chadek Green, Whispering Meadows, and Court Hill Parks. Most work is complete at Whispering Meadows and Court Hill, with more substantial work remaining at Chadek Green. We are also still awaiting arrival of the Chadek Green Playground which will likely delay install until spring. • Work continues on the single-track trail staff is constructing at Terrell Mill Park. • REAP Grant funded work at Ryerson's Woods has picked up pace as weather dependent work is being accomplished throughout the seasons. • Extension of the Hwy 6 trail from Fairmeadows Blvd to Heinz Rd has begun. Iowa City Parks and Recreation Commission Packet I City of Iowa City • Staff added dog agility features to Rita's Ranch. • The first of the public input meetings for the Kiwanis playground and Willow Creek Trail replacements will occur the evening of October 4th. Recreation: • Iowa City Farmers Market hosted the annual Kids Market event on Saturday, September 24. The maximum spaces for kids vendors was reached and the participating kids were well supported by the community. • Try Fishing Derby was held at Lower City Park on September 25. 50-plus elementary school children tried their hand at fishing with support from trained staff and parental guidance. Kids also enjoyed fish -related activities including gyotaku fish painting, fish short stories and a casting game. Iowa CNR and the Iowa City Public Library assisted with this event. • Fall program availability! Some programs in late fall still have some availability. Share with your friends and register yourself and your family today! Find our Rec Guide and registration information on our website: https://www.lcgov.org/recreation Facilities: • The final items of the new splash pad features for Fairmeadows and Weatherby were delivered, installed and recalibrated in mid -September. The total cost for both projects is $65,809.24, and they will have an approximate water savings of 50,400 Gallons Per Day! • The site has been marked for MidAmerican Energy Company to install 8 new street and parking lights south of Mercer Park, the work will be occurring this early autumn. MidAmerican Energy Company is modifying the new lamp fixtures to accommodate security cameras. • Staff are continue working to adjust and accommodate occupancy building temperatures for the mixed outdoor temperatures of this time of the year. Cemetery: • Staff has been busy hauling tree debris to the landfill. • Staff has also been working on stocking our dry storage building with fill sand and black dirt before the Fall/Winter seasons. Top Staff Issues Parks • Finding seasonal staff to fill the fall season has been a challenge. Recreation • Covid and other illness continue to impact employee availability and has led to the postponement/cancellation of some events and programs. Iowa City Parks and Recreation Commission Packet I City of Iowa City Facilities • Staff have completed winterizing the splash pads and City Park Pool. The motor at the Weatherdance fountain is being repaired and staff will test operations of new unit and will winterize for the season. • Staff are presently winterizing facilities, planning for switching operations and systems over. This includes HVAC equipment and draining exterior water systems at City Hall, Recreation Centers, Senior Center, TTRA Lodge, Ashton House and Fire Stations. • After a summer of camp activities at Ashton House, maintenance staff are working on freshening up interior spaces for fall and winter rentals. Cemetery: • Mowing and trimming has slowed due to the dry conditions. • Staff has been busy watering sod/plants/trees. • Staff will make ground repair (filling in low spots) a priority this month. ...... .............. ................. ._.....__ ................City of tows City Facility SustainabiI ty Projects - - --- - One of the seven City -flow City StroteglE Gaols• Promote Environments! Sustamahtlrty .................... ...... ..... ..................... .................... 9mlett .____.._ ._._._.._....._....._........._..............................._................_.... r........ _..... _............ _._._.._._............ _._.... ...................... _......... _........ _..... _.......... ... ? iCOm9ltant/ IDesD'gtbn ;fnr¢rattor I tort _......_....._........................._._........._._....._....._............................-v.._.._._.._._.._........_._... Rebate ! _.._..._._............_. Ist ...................._....._.........._....._..............._._........_...__ __......_. .............. ............. ..... r ...... MetriyWybck Mewe/ScattlOn Debsmidficati-arA ruck Poimbg it owair uaf mdairerCangein [95ivnMatt .mgn O ty ery mc, I, mnzukarc ...........................i.__M............_ Transfer nm rebates ;as/ Installed, Prq¢tt, Projett willinduda inmrporztion eAS conhols ifhe Mercer Nitiamd¢mbecto+em mtle. iUDC mMracmr and' estimate ':triwing and i up to a mile oo pflons wv[h new syaletM �Metlsarixal 31os Is%L,b Bt i cbuout I of water nill be savetl !&Part oftm rcoverr ...—._—_.______.__......................._._...._......_....t__.._....._.._._.._.._.__....._._........._...._._..___._._..._......__.......................... . Me2tai5CRN•m Gteror LED fighpr•Rep1clmmt ... __._... _...... _ �A'vPe-NaNery • ri I Rer _........................................... Pe Ma ImCellit45 nrfi v..._..... i ........ ... Co a .... .--_......_.._._.........._..... _.... 9c � MlNlape11Qm1fi••••- !Replxe mr�mal hay%iee Lights w4th LED !hcfwe 'g M' g iNew Poclby tm Muse Public WO hs—__.__. .. ............... P ubLCWmks htdmlein<e PKI' LEEDm¢sOF¢d buTtlin !Neumann s1•,91{AO�IEDLi•hYin�rebatt ;pealing !COMtmttan_..._:_ ............._........... .... i 1'xaiy received an [P3959t Dovsens Of sleets, Trafi-x eagireer -- MOM -/Merit ;$23,274andamrtom 99%mmpmte Etce%eMein Design Water Dishibaab- ICOMfMttbn eswr;y incMhve I iAw.rd, wftha 52% I rtrabeyes rel¢to ! efficiency rating nith 7 S37,590, for total ! mrnperablebmOQng 1icettive of sGosm. itypobgies. ............_._.....................__—_._.____I ........_......................................_......_...._....._..........._....................................._....._..K.__._._.i.__..__...___..._._..____...._ �PP45OhrpMje[t-new __........._....._.____._I _—_._...._.._._........ Pubk Wmks Solar Prgett PabficWmks NNeumann MOmon p-6 we !bid ............ ........................................ ............ _.��... .._ ... .... ...... ;ShucNee. a ....t..........................................._................. �.- Tery .........�F._........._.......................L........... ' ................ ._............._ ....... !nh .... .. !qs Ntltl iNmrmatrn Monson pen6rG _......... _.... . _.._._...__..... _,..._...._...._...._...! ........................._........_._. i. CRYXaglRN 3rep Mmint Re ,placvoE;XYGC alatem fmCi[Y Nall �AiveNaNeY.uc0 00I 53OP26.SOi mcenfives-ntlirg ;Ordlrld j.__._....._..._......_.._.. Po%ceandbwelevel icowtactor ! !Repbcetl eaistaK unit 1 with Nigh efficient j I i-a, ove fifeofnew 1 1 i.it swdDwsaviogs Iowa City Parks and Recreation Commission Packet I City of Iowa City Oakland Cemetery FY 23 Revenue Report ** shaded areas represent previous Syr average Revenue from Lot Sales Lot Sale Syr Average # of Interments Interments Syr avg. Revenue from Interments 5-year Avg. on Interments Total Revenue Syr Avg. on total revenue July $3,270.00 $4,456.00 5 6.4 $3,310.00 $3,342.00 $6,580.00 $7,798.00 August $13,782.50 $5,962.50 10 6.6 $5,877.50 $3,890.00 $19,660.00 $9,852.50 Sept $3,062.50 $10,001.75 7 8.0 $2,995.00 $4,867.25 $6,057.50 $14,869.00 Oct Nov E $20,115.00 $20,420.25 22 21 $12,182.50 $12,099.25 $32,297.50 $32,519.50 Iowa City Parks and Recreation Commission Packet I City of Iowa City 0 `o E 3 O N N N N T m N N O fl m N N rl O N O Q 2 ¢ Z 6 Z Q 2 ¢ Z ¢ Z a Z Q Q 2 Q 2 Q 2 Q Z ¢ Z ¢ z Q Z Q 2 ¢ Z Q Z Q Q z ¢ Z ¢ z ¢ z ¢ z 6 Z 6 2 ¢ Z 6 Z Q Q z ¢ z ¢ Z Q 2 Q 2 a Z Q z ¢ z ¢ z ¢ z 6 Q 2 Q z ¢ z Q Z ¢ z ¢ z ¢ z ¢ z ¢ Z 6 a z o a -z a z a z ¢ z a z a z a z a z a z a z a zz a a z a z a z a z a z a z a a z a z a z a z a z a z a z a z a Z a z a a z Q z a z a Z a z a z a z a z a z a z a z a z a a z a z a z a z a z a z a z a z a z a z a z a z a z a a z a z a z a z a z a z a z a z a z a z a z a z a z a z a z a z a z a z a z a z a z a z a z a z a z a z a z ¢ z a z a z a z a z a z a z a z o a z a z a z a z a z a z Q z a z a Z a z a z a z a z a z a z a z a z a z ¢ z ¢ z O a z a z Q z Q z a z a z a z a z a z a z a z a z a z a z a z ¢ z a z a z a z a z a z a z a z a z 0 0 0 0 o a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o n o a z a z a z a z a z a a z a z a z a z a z a z a z a z a z a z a z a z a z a z a z a z ¢ z a z a z a z z z z z z z z z o z z z z z a z z z z z z z z z z z z z z o z z z z z z z z o z O z n v01i n voi n N n v°'i n v°'i n � n �n n v01i n v°1i n w N n w V1 n v°1i n v°1i n v01i n v°1i n v°1i n a N n w N n a N a N n w V1 n w V1 n v°'i n v01i n vvi n a N n a V1 n w V1 n w V1 n a VI D E E 3 n b m m n m m b ut m m m m m n ao n m w b P m m o" P m o 0 0 o P o 0 o ry o o M o 0 0 b o m m o m P m Q o P m o n ry P m N O P 10 n Q N O N m m b P Jl W O l0 b P n N N Q N n N N JI 10 Ol W l0 Q O] ul P J1 n O1 Ol O H l0 P W Jt vl b N W V n l0 Q M W Vf W l0 lD P M N M b b O n P l0 M O Q n 1p O N Q Q n M Q v\ M lO lD Q M O vl 10 O Q P M b M . n . b O P P b n O + N N V1 M W M b N P V1 O N M y 6 N O T pi n O V1 W N W pl O Qz b pJ N O N m b n Q M^'.� P n Q l0 N Z<Vl Jf b P M O 2 O N b M OJ N M n M n J) n Ol CO ti m Z b OJ O 2 O w Q n N OJ P b VI W n Val n N N n VI M n ✓al Q n Val n VI l0 n Val n n V1 W n N Ol n Val O n Val n Val N n N M n Val Q n Val n Val b n V1 n n V1 W n Val m a N 0 n Ml n Vail n Val n N n Val n N n Val n N n Val n N mi n August 2022 Water Fitness Classes Class Name Day of Week Time Location Enrollment Water Aerobic Class with Jen Mondays (Last 3 Mondays) 8:15 - 9am RALRC 7 Deep Water Aerobics Class with Helen Mondays 5:15 - 6pm RALRC 11 Arthritis Foundation Class with Rita Mondays 11am - 12pm MPAC 8 Aqua Bootcamp with Becky Tuesdays 1:15 - 2pm MPAC 9 Arhtritis Foundation Class with Becky Tuesdays 12:30 - 1:15pm MPAC 11 Water Aerobics Class with Jen Wednesdays 8:15 - 9am RALRC 7 Gentle Water Exercise with Deanne Thursdays (1st 4 Thursdays) 9 - loam MPAC 9 Aqua Bootcamp with Becky Thursdays (Last 4 Thursdays) 1:15 - 2pm MPAC 6 Arthritis Foundation Class With Becky Thursdays (Last 4 Thursdays) 12:30 - 1:15pm MPAC 8 Deep Water Aerobics Class with Helen Fridays (Last 4 Fridays) 5:15 - 6pm RALRC 10 Water Aerobics class with Jen Fridays (No Class 9/23) 8:15 - 9 am RALRC 5 Deep Water Gentle Exercise with Deanne Saturdays 9 - loam RALRC 5 Aqua Bootcamp with Connie Sundays 11am - 12pm MPAC 16 The following documents were handed out during the meeting. BIKE LANES WArenue(IMyfi foI Budinglon(B'nmideI Camp C Ninal comon ooaga Gmmor aneaon Melrose B"OuWL MMlson Wa e Mormon irek(MM.. RaM1M Cm, l S�[n 2JI3,023 l09 uAg. K kuk(smh of Hw W U.(Greerrvmae fthM1 ar(19t Mam Bicycle Network With Proposed Facility Types Legend On -Street Bicycle Facilities Existing Proposed — � eee �nemvme sno.mea clilnnhc Lanelupldl six. t.e. — � BuflwM BlNe lnnea — m PmleGea BiM laneLCyW Tea,ka — _-�= airryp. BoulevaNa Manned and Slanea Rouses . cosd.� sway Off Sireet Bicycle Facilities Exsehng Proposed Mnnl-IUsnarea-Nm Pasna sldepelxs -encucII ` µroc lend.. omns.en Eedlxiez ah Less s.nNnuio.v. .lewd 1A eelNnN dry reN 0bitch=o Ts mites I 0 0.5 IMiles alta CITI .1 IN.'CIPn Map 24.&,,ele Network with Proposed Feality Types m en se, —a.MP°.a RECOMMENDATIONS^ 79 Iowa City Pedestrian and Bicycling Collisions by Year 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 #-Pedestrian Collisions s Bicycle Collisions