HomeMy WebLinkAbout2023-01-10 Transcription Page 1
Council Present: Alter, Bergus, Dunn, Harmsen, Taylor, Teague, Thomas
Staff Present: Fruin, Jones, Kilburg, Goers, Fruehling, Platz, Havel, Sovers, Ford,
Liston, Walz.
1. Call to Order
Teague: It is just after 6:00 P.M. on January 10, 2023. And this is the City of Iowa City um-urn
formal meeting. And I'm gonna ask a roll call,please [NOISE] shouldn't have hit that
first. [Roll Call]
Teague: All right. Well,welcome to everyone that is in the audience and also those that are on
social media. Urn, and we want to actually welcome our newest councilor, Andrew Dunn,
who was just, a- appointed earlier today. And we'll just give a round of applause of
welcome. [APPLAUSE].
Dunn: Thank you, Mr. Mayor.
2. Proclamations
2.a. Martin Luther King Junior Day
Teague: Alright,we're gonna go on with our agenda. Which item number 2 is proclamations and
the urn,proclamation 2.a is Martin Luther King Junior Day. (Reads proclamation). And
to receive this is our Human Rights Commissioner, Roger Lusala. [APPLAUSE]
Lusala: Thank you, Mr. Mayor. Thank you Iowa City Council for this proclamation. I'm here
today representing a group of people that I serve on Human Rights Commission, and to
accept this on behalf of all the work they do as well to better our community. My favorite
quote by Dr. King is, the way to get started is to quit talking and begin doing. The
teaching of Dr. King's continue to guide us and inspire us in addressing problem that we
see in our community today. The question usually is,what can I do to keep Dr. King's
dream alive? So I have 10 simple things we can do to keep Dr. King's dream alive,
befriend someone different than you. Someone who does not look like you, talk like you,
live like you. It doesn't have to be that complicated. Number 2,pay attention to social
issue in our community today. Find the one that makes you pause and do something
about it. Do not ignore community issue that make you uncomfortable. Face it.Number
3, serve others. That's all we all here to do. Number 4, lead by example.Number 5 is
have faith in humanity. That's what a lot of our non-profit represented here today do on a
daily basis.Number 6, diversify your reading list. Diversify your movie list. Diversify the
places you eat, the places you shop. Read a book by a black author,watch a movie by
black director or black cast members. Visit a black owned establishment. We have plenty
in Iowa City here. Number 7, be an ally- ally. Don't just say you are, actually be one.
Number 8, support organization that advance equal rights. We have many in Iowa city,
find the one that feeds your soul. Number 9, practice inclusiveness in your everyday life
and the places you work or play. And number 10, volunteer and give back. Those are the
This represents only a reasonably accurate transcription of the Iowa City City Council regular
formal meeting of January 10, 2023.
Page 2
way we can advance and keep Dr. King's life- dreams alive. And for Martin Luther
King's Day, on Monday,we have a great event taking place. We invite all of you guys.
We're going to have a unity march starting uh, Eastdale Plaza at 09:45,we're gonna walk
all the way to Mercer park where they're gonna be all kinds of activity and speakers from
our my community leaders and the leaders in our black community, so we invite you all
to join us. And there'll be food, Supervisor Porter's cooking walking tacos, so you are all
invited. Thank you very much Council
Teague: Thank you. [APPLAUSE]
This represents only a reasonably accurate transcription of the Iowa City City Council regular
formal meeting of January 10, 2023.
Page 3
9. Community Comment
Teague: Alright. Community comment,uh, time. This is an opportunity which is item number 9.
This is an opportunity for individuals within our community to come up to speak about
any item that is not on our agenda. You'll be provided up to three minutes. There is a
sign-in sheet that we ask people to sign in and when you, urn, address your comments,
please state your name and the city you are from. Welcome.
Ross: Hi,my name is Brandon Ross. Happy New Year. Everybody. Uh,welcome uh, Mr. Dunn.
I supported you in your previous run. And if I had another rhyme, I would use it. I would
like to reiterate points that I think are important for this- this coming year. One would be
uh, increase affordable housing. Uh, I think that we don't have enough. We have
something called the housing market and nobody knows what it is. Uh, landlords can just
ra-raise rent to whatever they want. And the city has usually very little to say about that,
but I'd like that to change. I would like the homeless shelter uh, to be expanded. The
program for the homeless shelter, I think we can do better. We have too many homeless
people our economy is not great. Uh, homelessness is growing, so that's a good thing to
do. Urn, I would say that transportation could be increased to Sunday transportation, I
mean,people who- who don't have cars and that's a lot of people they can't get around. So
if they have jobs and things like that, they can't get to them on Sunday, and that's an
economic problem. They should have the right to be able to do that um, and to encourage
further transportation use. Kiosks are very helpful and benches,uh, if we can fit it into
our budget to make a bus stops a little bit more livable. People are oftentimes out in the
cold or very hot, and they're taking a bus. You know, those who are healthy in the middle
years are usually good,but the elderly, the handicap, uh,those people need to have access
and then handicapped accessibility could always be improved. Uh,the man who came
before me and spoke he said some beautiful things and I couldn't possibly even approach
wha-what he was getting into when it comes to Dr. Martin Luther King,urn, I'm honored
to say went to the same university as I did. Boston University was one of his places. Um,
I would say that Martin Luther King would. I like to think about him. I think about some
of his last speeches in- in his- his speeches against the Vietnam War. He was against that.
He believed that basically,wars in general did not help the people. They helped the
oligarchs, those who had the money, and people made money like today, our- our
military arms industrial complex makes money like Raytheon and Boeing and they just
make hand-over-hand no matter who we go out to and Dr. King was very pointed about
this. He was not soft-spoken in this area, and I respect him with all my heart and this
area. And with this in mind, I would like to please encourage people to write your
congress people and the President uh, to call in demand negotiations for a war that is very
dangerous that's going out in Ukraine. Basically what you have is nine years Civil War,
Eastern Ukrainians versus Western and now it's the US versus Russia. Please do contact.
Also about reading new books. I got one. How the West, you brought war to Ukraine.
Please read this. It's 90 pages. I'm taking a few extra seconds. I'll- I'll let them back
sometime later. Thank you.
Teague: Alright. Anyone else like to address Council? I have to give a little.
This represents only a reasonably accurate transcription of the Iowa City City Council regular
formal meeting of January 10, 2023.
Page 4
Zeimet: Hi, council.
Teague: Welcome.
Zeimet: Urn, so just a couple of announcements. Uh,the university will be starting spring
semester next Tuesday. And also the Student Government this semester will be going to
the capital to meet with representatives and help pass the renters checklists. And that's all.
Thank you.
Teague: Thank you. And if you can just state your name for the record and the city you're from.
Zeimet: Keaton Zeimet. Iowa City.
Teague: Thank you. [BACKGROUND] Welcome.
Michaud: Hi. Urn, I'm Pam Michaud. Live, uh, in College Green Historic District for 32 years.
And,urn, I've been thrilled to note three houses have changed ownership out of the 16 in
the last few years. There's young blood and families with actual children. And the third
but not least, is the Catholic Worker House that moved next door, uh, at 113 South
Johnson across the alley from my house. Very welcome because they provide,uh, needed
housing for recent immigrants from any source. But generally,uh, they seem to be, uh,
devoted to Central American refugees. So unfortunately,there's no one in the house that
is bilingual. So I can't be a good neighbor and take stuff over there. Uh, and they don't
have COVID shots. But anyway,uh, what has changed in the last year from rental
housing is that the directors of the Catholic Worker House have expanded their mission
to the third- a third of Eastern Iowa. So as of the last three and plus weeks, over
Christmas, over blizzards,people have driven a two-hour commute or two hour distance
from Wapello, Henry, Louisa, all kinds of counties far away to have, uh, English
assistance to apply online or in paper for COVID relief checks. Some of these people
have been very hard workers at Tyson and those kinds of food companies. They deserve
the checks. But when they come from a long drive during a blizzard, you now,when the
Chill Factor is twe- 30 below,they need a parking space and they don't have it. So they're
looking desperately for where do I park?This is supposed to be a f- a public facility, it's
not. It's an office converted- a house converted into an office. Now, so, um, as of my
account, there were at least 50 applicants per day for the last,uh, 15 days, uh, at all
except Christmas. They've been running all except Christmas. So,urn, the director,uh,
that help purchase the house and got donations,that's fine. But they need to respect the
neighbors that have been there for a minimum of 32 years up to 57 years. And so just
having a historic district doesn't mean you're special, but it is a residential neighborhood.
Some rentals, but not all offices. And I would urge, urn,planning and zoning to have a
little bit of ca- accountability here as far as enforcing zoning issues because we all have
rights. Thank you.
Teague: Thank you. Would anyone else like to address any item that's not on our agenda?
Anyone online? All right.
This represents only a reasonably accurate transcription of the Iowa City City Council regular
formal meeting of January 10, 2023.
Page 5
10. Planning & Zoning Matters
10.a Zoning Code Amendment—Solar& Climate Action Ordinance
1. Public Hearing
Teague: Seeing no one,we're going to move on to item Number 10,which is planning and
zoning matters. And I will,um, go with 10.a, Zoning Code Amendment, solar and
climate action ordinance. So this is an ordinance amending Title 14 zoning code to
enhance land use,regulations related to solar energy systems and further climate action
goals. I'm going to open the public hearing. All right, and we're going to welcome
Danielle Sitzman.
Sitzman: Good evening,Mayor and Council Danielle Sitzman and Neighborhood Development
Services. This is a Zoning Code,uh, Amendment before you tonight. As a little bit of
background just to walk you through how we got to this, uh, point with this amendment.
Just a refresher which I'm sure you don't all need, but the city has an investment in,uh,
through it's comprehensive plan and multiple other plans over the years in climate action,
adaptation and addressing, uh, energy and energy use. The most recent,uh, study was a
solar feasibility study that Johnson County-that Johnson County Clean Energy District,
presented to staff,um, encouraging the city to take yet again, another look at our solar
ordinance is to make sure that we're doing everything we can and nothing that's making,
uh, implementation of photovoltaics solar energy systems,uh, difficult here in Iowa City.
So what you have before you tonight are the proposed code changes,um,based on a re-
review of our current ordinances, basically trying to make sure that what we are, uh,
encouraging is clear in our code language and- and not a barrier to installation of
photovoltaics solar,both in residential s- situations and commercial. Uh, as I said,this is
not something new. And the city does allow solar, has for quite some time,has taken a
look at our solar ordinances over the years. This is yet just another,uh, chance to take a
fresh look at it through the eyes of others. Uh, my current regulations basically re-
regulate those systems as mechanical systems. It's not the clearest way to state something.
If you're going to go look in a codebook for help, if you're a homeowner,you're probably
not going to type in mechanical systems. I want a mechanical system on my- on my roof.
So we're trying to be more transparent,use wording that was more common and really
make it clear that we were encouraging solar in every way that we could. Uh, you may
recall, in 2019 we had another,uh, code update addressing utility scale, ground mounted
solar,not rooftop,but things that we're operating more as a utility very large in scale,um,
and generating electricity in that way. We do also have a streamlined process already in
place in our historic and conservation zones,basically allowing for a staff review instead
of a historic Preservation Commission Review in those instances. And if you go back a
little bit further in time, and we streamlined our building permit process to standardize
that with the way,urn, other jurisdictions are, urn,reviewing and permitting solar
systems. So as I said, these amendments are really, urn, pretty minimal. I'm just trying to
add and clarify definitions, limit any regulatory barriers to solar energy that we have, and
provide in addition to those two things, some additional incentives to encourage solar
This represents only a reasonably accurate transcription of the Iowa City City Council regular
formal meeting of January 10, 2023.
Page 6
where we can. As far as the definitional changes that I mentioned, they are fairly minor.
They're just adding actually the wording solar energy systems in a lot of ways to make
the code more searchable. Explaining, that's what we meant all along by mechanical
structures. That hasn't we think been a real, urn, detriment to people who have made
applications. It may just not have been as inviting as it could be for folks who were
considering this and just couldn't find themselves in the code. As far as removing
potential regulatory barriers,um, these are things that we were not, uh, blocking solar in
the past, but it wasn't perhaps as clear as it could be. Um, the solar systems didn't need to
comply with maximum heights, that they were considered integrated into the building by
simply being on the roof. Urn,removing some of this wording about screening
requirements. Obviously,you don't want to screen the sun away from a solar array when
you're wanting to encourage that. Urn, we're moving the concealed pum-public view
requirement for roof mounted solar. Urn, if you can recall far enough back, solar was a
new and different thing, uh, when it first was being implemented decades ago. Anymore,
it's more of a normal and customary thing. And so a lot of the code language was maybe
put in place in the very early days of addressing solar and no longer needs to really be
there. It's not something that,um, is a negative externality for neighborhoods to have.
And what, as I said,the city is really looking to encourage. We did also add some minor,
uh, modification,uh, language, the last additional flexibility for review of truly unique
and odd circumstances, if they should come up. The minor modification process is a
process that already exist in our code for,uh, changing some zoning standards in just a
little bit of a way, depending on what they are. We do that with setbacks and heights and
some other things. So this is just adding solar to the ability to request some minor
modification from staff They have a particularly unique circumstance, it needs another
look at it. Also, it includes prevention from private covenants, deed restrictions from
restricting solar in neighborhoods. Oftentimes, a home owner will find out the city is
perfectly okay with their solar array,but their homeowners association has language,uh,
that would block that. This wouldn't be retroactive,but would work on any new,urn,
covenants going forward. As I mentioned, we also wanted to include voluntary regulatory
incentives to encourage solar for folks who are maybe not thinking about it or when they
are thinking about it, it doesn't pencil out dollars wise. We wrote in some incentives
allowing additional density and reducing parking, knowing that both of those things
either help the bottom line or remove a cost. Parking is a cost. And so if we can offset
some costs, those costs can be invested into solar instead. The package does include some
examples of how that would work out. There's a series of bonuses that can be acquired,
uh, dependi- depending on the system. So we think this addresses gaps in the city's code,
makes it clearer. There are some potential trade-offs for the fee in lieu system, but we
really took a look at things that were marginal and we thought would have-uh, be a good
trade-off So overall, this is an amendment if we've considered it to be consistent with the
city's comprehensive plan and the city's climate action goals to reduce carbon emissions.
And this is simply a Zoning Code Amendment, it's coming to you from the Planning and
Zoning Commission tonight. Once adopted, uh,we would simply apply this to our
existing permitting processes. So based on a review of the relevant criteria, best practices,
and consultation with the city sustainability staff and the Johnson County Group, staff
does recommend the proposed code amendment to enhance the land use regulation
This represents only a reasonably accurate transcription of the Iowa City City Council regular
formal meeting of January 10, 2023.
Page 7
related so- to solar energy systems and to further implement the city's goals related to
climate action. At their December 7th meeting, the Planning and Zoning Commission
concurred with staffs opinion and voted six, zero. Happy to answer any questions.
Bergus: Just a quick question, Danielle, I had heard sorry- over here. I had heard once that,um,
you couldn't install solar panels on the side of a residential roof facing the street because
they were visible. So does the-the language that says solar panels are exempt from this,
would that take care of it?
Sitzman: Right. That would.
Bergus: Okay. Thank you.
Thomas: Danielle, I had one- one concern I have and hopefully it's- can be quickly answered,
uh, is- is on the providing the reg-regulatory incentives. Uh, will they in any way, um,
I'm not quite sure how to put it,but,you know we have- I think we want to try to
incentivize affordable housing,you know, with say like eliminating-potentially any way
eliminating parking minimums when we're-we're looking at affordable housing units. If
we provide,uh, such waivers for,you know, solar, is there any conflict with that?I mean,
we-you- you only have certain number of parking spaces one can wave if they are
waived for solar,that seems like it might conflict, or at least potentially conflict with
waiving them for affordable housing.
Sitzman: So there's only so- so many levers we can pull. And we've pulled that lever for
affordable housing, I guess is the same lever we would be pulling it for a developer that
might not choose to do affordable housing, but might choose solar. So we're never gonna
get everything with one thing but wouldn't make it as another option. So yeah, eventually,
uh,parking will be something that is no longer as an effective lever to pull,but I think
every development could be slightly different in what they're trying to accomplish. And
so a commercial-not residential, but a commercial business might choose the parking
reduction for solar and they wouldn't have that option for affordable housing. So it's just
another option.
2. Motion to give first consideration
Teague: Hearing no other questions. Thank you. Would anyone from the public like to address
this topic?If anyone is online, now is the time as well to raise your hand online. Alright,
before I close this public hearing council are you're inclined to vote with P&Z?Alright.
I'm gonna close the public hearing. Can I get a motion to give first consideration?
Bergus: So moved Bergus.
Alter: Second. Alter.
Teague: Council discussion.
This represents only a reasonably accurate transcription of the Iowa City City Council regular
formal meeting of January 10, 2023.
Page 8
Bergus: I greatly appreciate the cleanup for,uh, searchability. I think that's glad we're being
aware of that kind of thing.
Teague: Yes.
Alter: And updating and to make it to- to-to reflect better that norms have changed as well. So-
Taylor: I encourage, I'm- I'm pleased that it's encouraging an incentive for the affordable housing
aspect of it too, that- that that's an option. Uh, and solar,we've been trying to encourage
developers to, uh, be in line with our climate control, urn,plan and I think this'll- this'll
help that.
Teague: Roll call,please.[Roll Call] Motion passes 7 - 0.
This represents only a reasonably accurate transcription of the Iowa City City Council regular
formal meeting of January 10, 2023.
Page 9
11. Convey Sanitary Sewer Easement
1. Public Hearing
Teague: Item number 11 is conveys sanitary sewer easement resolution approving the
conveyance of a private sanitary sewer easement to metro pavers ink adjacent to lot one,
Metro Pavers first edition. I'm going to open the public hearing and welcome Jason
Havel.
Havel: Good evening. Jason Havel, City Engineer, uh, here to give you a little bit of background
for this item. So for those of you that are not-maybe not familiar this site is located on
South Gate Avenue- the West End of South Gate Avenue between Gilbert street and the
river. Uh, Metro Pavers has gone through the subdivision process, they're looking at a
proposed building on the site. With that, there would be a sanitary sewer service as well
as the water service that would be needed for that,which is typical. Urn, and often what
happens is those are extended from the building into the right-of-way where they tie into
the city's main. Urn, in- in the drawing here you can see that's exactly what's happening
with their water service so they're going from the building to the existing water main
that's located within the South Gate Avenue right away. What makes this site a little bit
unique is that you can see the right-of-way, which is that dashed line that sort of
encompasses South Gate Avenue, ends just west of their driveway. And the green line in
the green dot is our sanitary sewer and our sanitary sewer manhole. And that extends just
west of the right-of-way onto private property,but in this case it's a city lot. And so in
order for them to tie into that manhole, which is where we would like them to- to tie into
and is- is typical, they would need a easement from the city to install that on city
property. And so that's what is in front of you is an easement to allow them to tie their
private sanitary service into our sanitary sewer main. As we look at this area,uh, this is
an area where we anticipate that in the future, the right-of-way would be extended,uh,
likely for a- a cul-de-sac or other turnaround in this area. Uh, the- this property also
already has existing easements on it,uh, so it really shouldn't be a- any issue to- to add to
that. Uh,but because of that, and I guess the other thing I would point out is, once this
does become right away that easement would go away because we don't have easements
in right away, it would be a- an allowed use at that point. So, uh,because of that, it is
proposed not to have any fee charge for this easement too but basically just to-to grant
them the easement to allow them to install this sanitary sewer service. So that's what I
got. If you have any questions,happy to- to answer those.
Alter: This is a really basic question because I recognize it in the inset. But where specifically is
what buildings are those? Is not the proposed but the actual. The purpo-where the
proposed is that the 3M?No.
Havel: So are you asking that kind of where that location is at?
Alter: Yeah. I'm sorry. I'm just like, I'm completely discombobulated.
This represents only a reasonably accurate transcription of the Iowa City City Council regular
formal meeting of January 10, 2023.
Page 10
Havel: So,um, this lot actually goes, there's kinda that I call a small lake area there just east of
the river that the lot actually extends all the way up to Highway 6 behind Hills Bank and
that kinda thing.
Alter: Okay. Got you.
Havel: Yeah.
Alter: Thank you. It's is just-
Havel: Sure- Sure. Yeah.
Alter: I was not acclimating myself. Thank you.
2. Motion to approve
Teague: Hear nothing else. Thank you. Alright. Anyone from the public like to address this
topic? If you're online,please raise your hand and we'll acknowledge you. Seeing no one,
I'm going to-before I close the public hearing, is Council inclined to vote with on this?
Alright. I'm gonna close the public hearing. Can I get a motion to approve, please?
Bergus: So moved, Bergus.
Dunn: Second, Dunn.
Alright. And council discussion. Roll-call,please. [Roll Call] Motion passes, 7 - 0.
This represents only a reasonably accurate transcription of the Iowa City City Council regular
formal meeting of January 10, 2023.
Page 11
12. Discrimination Against Section 8 Tenants
Teague: Item number 12 is discrimination against Section 8 tenants, Ordinance amending Title 2
entitled"Human Rights"chapter 1, entitled"General Provisions"to eliminate the pro-
prohibition on landlords discriminated against Housing Choice Voucher holders. And this
is second consideration. Urn, could I get a motion for a second consideration, please? Can
I get a motion for a second consideration?
Bergus: So moved.
Teague: Moved by Bergus.
Alter: Second by Alter.
Teague: Second by Alter. All right. Anyone from the public like to address this topic? Seeing no
one, council discussion?
Harmsen: Yeah, Mr. Mayor, I think this is from a purely logical standpoint. I think city staff
and,uh, city attorney's office has done a wonderful job of identifying things that legally
because of the action in Des Moines that we cannot, um,we cannot enforce this that's on
our books. And it's very clear from our earlier discussions that everybody on this council
is in support of having,urn, their ordinance being enforceable, although we don't have
that power. Uh, because the world isn't always purely logical place, I find myself,the
more I've thought about this and just understanding we're now at an inflection point
where we might see some landlords decide to yank housing for people where at that point
in time where they're starting to be able to. I just don't feel comfortable supporting this at
this time, although I realize it's just a symbolic act that I wish it was more than that. Uh,
but I think maybe that's symbolism does have some value for the people who might be in
the coming. Hopefully not. Hopefully this will be a moot point and we'll find out that it's
a moot point. But-but if somebody, if family is seeing that I just hate having, even
though it's symbolic and a logically make sense and it doesn't actually have an impact, it
just feels wrong to me. So I will not be supporting,uh, this particular one this time
around. And- and that's my reasoning why.
Teague: I will say that this certainly isn't something that I feel,um, happy to, that's before us.
And as you mentioned, the state has kind of,urn,made it mandatory,um,where cities
don't- uh, landlords have the right to not accept housing vouchers. And while none of this
council, um, supports you know,this action, um, I also believe that,you know, we have
to uphold the law,urn, you know, on some levels. I think there's other ways to,um,try to
help individuals within our community, although, you know, it- it becomes a challenge.
When you're talking about landlord,their desires and what the heart of this community
needs,which is more affordable housing. So because this is the law, and I recognize that
really there is nothing that we can do,urn, against this, I will vote in favor of it. But I-
um, I wish this wasn't before us.
This represents only a reasonably accurate transcription of the Iowa City City Council regular
formal meeting of January 10, 2023.
Page 12
Harmsen: Amen to that.
Alter: I raised a similar objection during the first hearing, um,with a question as to,you know,
with this potentially have any,urn,hold any difficulties for us and,urn, city attorney and
city manager themselves reluctantly,but clearly explained why this could become
problematic. And so Sean, I applaud you and I agree with you. Urn, I think that for us to
have, uh,the clearest path in terms of what the city's position is in accordance with the
state as it's mandated, I'm not okay but okay with supporting it. Simply for the- the- for
the-the running of the city in the way in which it needs to.
Harmsen: As a point of clarification, the-the thing is the state mandate is we can't enforce it,but
there's no law that says we have to change our code at any particular point in time, is
there or- or I'm I misunderstanding that?
Goers: No,you're right. I mean,the state law indicates that any such ordinance would be
unenforceable as it relates, uh, to the housing choice, vouchers, subsidies. Uh, and- and
so that's why we were,uh, surgical in removing just that and leaving in all the other anti-
discrimination provisions in the ordinance and so forth. My-my concern, uh, as I
articulated at the last meeting when this was discussed, but perhaps for the benefit of
council member Dunn,was that,uh,you know, years from now,uh, it might be the case
that we've lost some institutional memory or knowledge that-uh, that this provision
currently on the books, if it were to remain on the books, is unenforceable. And we would
thus give some answers,uh, to members of the public indicating, uh, that it is enforceable
and that could create some problems for us in- in potential liability for us. And- and so,
uh, that's one of the reasons why I think it would be, uh,best legally to clean it from our-
uh, from our books.
Harmsen: And I think that makes real sense. I think one of my concerns and my fears is, and I
think the idea that this could cause confusion down the road is, I think you're almost
certainly correct in that analysis. My confusion is right now because we're at that
inflection point that if we repeal this as a council, it will cause confusion in the other
direction. And if God forbid, there are landlords that are willing to kick poor people out
on the street, I do not expect them to be the kind of people to, in good faith explain, who
allowed this to happen?And they'd be more than happy to throw us to the wolves, so to
speak. Uh, you know, say that weeds are something we did and there'll be stories about
the fact that the council passed this,which there should be. Uh, and- I'm sure the stories
will explain the nuance of this decision which you're all completely correct on. I'm
thinking this is just not the right time. Urn, I would be absolutely happy to,you know,
think about this more between now and the third reading, and maybe even think about
pushing this off a little ways until we see exactly what happens here in our community.
Now that this is like the new largest took effect nine days ago, 10 days ago. Urn, I just
think it's- it's real close, and- and by, while being proactive on this is like normally I
would be 100 percent. I mean, I'm applauding that like our city staff being on top of this I
think that's- that's admirable. As this is a unique situation where we could be seeing some
people in dire streets and I do not want to confuse them, thinking that we were in favor of
This represents only a reasonably accurate transcription of the Iowa City City Council regular
formal meeting of January 10, 2023.
Page 13
what's gonna-what could potentially happen to them. My hope is a few months down the
road, we're going to have a much clearer idea of how this change in the law is going to
impact our community. And at that point in time, if there is no problem then I'll have no
problem. Um, does that- so that's why I'm coming in. I think by the way, those of you that
are supporting it, I think you're doing so for all the right reasons and- and your reasons
make sense to me. I just- like I said, I just can't personally go along with this at this time.
Teague: I will say that there has been, you know, some information about this out there,both
with landlords and with some renters. And the renters is very clear that this was a state- I
mean,these are some immigrant individuals are,that-very clear that this is a state thing,
that this is not a city,urn,urn desire,but we unfortunately have to fall under that, um,that
law. So while I do understand your fear, I don't believe to that a manifests in a great deal,
not to say that some people won't misunderstand it. And those that are advocating and
helping individuals,urn, with any of this type stuff,they're very- I mean,they're very
clear on saying this is a state thing and-urn, and realizing that it's the law. So,urn, that's
why I felt comfortable,urn, you know, forward- and forward and yeah. So I just wanted
to at least make a statement there. Any other comments?
Dunn: I'd just like to express that I- I think I'm falling in the-the same places Councilor
Harmsen,urn, from- from the,you know, the conversation that we've had here, I think I'd
be more comfortable in waiting. Urn, and I don't plan to support at this point.
Thomas: What about just simply deferring on this?Um, if the idea is to- to wait. Urn, I mean. Is
there- in other words, is there an urgency in us making a decision on this now if council
Harmsen,you're-you're just thinking it's something you might support in- in the near
future or?
Harmsen: Well, I mean, I think when we see what the reality of the situation is, we just don't
know. It's just, like I said,this change happened in about 10 days ago. Urn,you know, I
just feel more comfortable kind of wait and see how that shakes out a little bit before we-
before we move on this. Urn, maybe in the meantime,you know,we do have other
initiatives we are doing which is important for the public to know to look at things like
our rent, you know, looking at things with our ARPA funds and our strategic plans to
hopefully find some other ways to make-help people stay in their fa-their homes even if
they are on rental assistance, maybe,urn, some,you know support for reluctant landlords
and some assurances. So we are working as a city and it's important again, I say this for
the public record, that we are looking at other alternatives to try and help our families as
this state law-new state law takes effect. I'm just this-part of this because of the
language and because I think the timing of it is just- makes me uncomfortable and I think
that you know, we're- nobody on this wants to vote yes for this is doing anything wrong
because it's just cleaning up based on state law. But I think that right now it could be
confusing and harmful,urn, and create- can- can create some confusion if we see a lot of
people losing their homes at this time. I'm hopeful that that does not happen, that that
does not manifest and in six months, I'll be like, this doesn't seem to be an issue that- that
we actually have. We now know were a few months in, we have now some idea and I
This represents only a reasonably accurate transcription of the Iowa City City Council regular
formal meeting of January 10, 2023.
Page 14
know I will feel more comfortable at that point assuming that we don't have a,you know,
a bunch of people discovering that they will be losing their homes simply because they
are in need- in need to use Section 8 vouchers. That's-that's my concern. Like I said,
everything else about this, I totally get it, totally makes sense, everybody is coming from,
you know staff and council members that support this coming from- doing the right thing
on every other respect except for this one that-that sticks in my craw.
Teague: Um, it sounds like maybe we- there could be a motion for a deferment and I would
suggest if there's a motion for deferment, I would put out a suggested date, September-
somewhere in September. Our first, uh, meeting in September would be that date.
Thomas: First meeting in September?
Teague: First meeting in September of 2023. That gives kinda the six-month and actually beyond
the 8/1 move.
Harmsen: Right, I was going to say beyond the-the midsummer lease,urn, shift that happens in
which it's a whole another issue,but yeah, that date would make complete sense to me
and I think we would have a clearer picture that I would be either firmly in support or
firmly against it at that point just by knowing what- kind of what the situation is here on
the ground. Um,would you like that in the form of a motion,Mr. Mayor?
Teageu: Yes, we would need a motion and then the date, if someone has a calendar.
Fruehling: September 5th.
Teague: September-
Taylor: Did you say 5th?
Teague: September 5th,you're like,uh, Mayor Throgmorton. He always knew the dates.
[LAUGHTER]
Alter: I'm happy to put forth a motion that we defer this [OVERLAPPING] series of hearings
and decision until September 5th.
Harmsen: I'll second that motion.
Teague: Okay. Moved by Alter, seconded by Harmsen. Further discussion. I will just make it-
make mention that the next item is not related, although it may seem like it is but, urn, it
is- it is two different beast or two different items, urn.
Goers: Oh, I'm sorry, Mayor. We- I think I heard a motion and a second to defer to date certain
of September 5th, did I miss a vote?
This represents only a reasonably accurate transcription of the Iowa City City Council regular
formal meeting of January 10, 2023.
Page 15
Teague: [OVERLAPPING] No. We'd have discussion after the motion.
Goers: No, that would just be a voice,uh,voice vote. I was afraid that you were moving on to
Item 13, I just wanted to make sure.
Teague: No,no, no,no, no, no. So we're just having a discussion.
Goers: Okay.
Teague: Any other comments?All right. All in favor of deferment, say aye. [Voice vote] Aye.
Any oppose?Motion passes to defer until September 5th, 7-0.
This represents only a reasonably accurate transcription of the Iowa City City Council regular
formal meeting of January 10,2023.
Page 16
13. Repeal of Rental Permit Cap
Teague: Can I, uh. All right. We're on to Item number 13, repeal of Rental Permit Cap, ordinance
amending Title 17 entitled Building and Housing Chapter 5 entitled housing code, to
repeal the rental permit Cap provision. Staff is requesting expedited action on this item.
Taylor: I move that the rule requiring that ordinances must be considered and voted on for
passage at two council meetings prior to the meeting at which it is to be finally passed be
suspended, that the second consideration and vote be waived and that the ordinance be
voted on for final passage at this time.
Taylor: Moved by Taylor.
Thomas: Second, Thomas.
Teague: Seconded by Thomas. Anyone from the public like to discuss,uh, this item? Seeing no
one in person or online, council discussion.
Harmsen: I might as well just go ahead and step in it again. Um, the-the reason I actually-
because this has actually now been in effect for a couple of years. Urn,unfortunately, this
ability was removed from the city, uh, couple of years ago. It has been in place for a
while. I don t think that the- some of my concerns with the last one about confusion and-
and where this is coming from, you know, that [NOISE] that period of time has elapsed
and so- so I will be supporting this one, urn, because it accomplishes all those goals,
which again, I- I agree with.
Teague: Roll call, please. [Roll Call] Motion passes 7-0. Can I get a motion to pass and adopt?
Dunn: So moved, Dunn.
Alter: Second, Alter.
Teague: Roll call,please. [Roll Call] Motion passes 7-0.
This represents only a reasonably accurate transcription of the Iowa City City Council regular
formal meeting of January 10, 2023.
Page 17
14. CPRB Ordinance
Teague: Item Number 16, amending the budget-the budgeted positions in this, no,what did I
say? Oh, 14. Flip pages. All right. Item Number 14 as CPRB ordinance. Ordinance
amending Title 8 entitled police regulations, Chapter 8 entitled Community Police
Review Board to clarify a person who observes an incident on social media does not have
the request,uh, personal knowledge to file a complaint and this is a motion to get first
consideration. Can I get a motion, please?
Taylor: So moved.
Alter: Second.
Teague: Moved by Taylor, seconded by Alter. Anyone from the public like to discuss this topic?
Seeing no one in-person and no one online, council discussion.
Taylor: I just think,urn, this makes,uh, common sense, uh, that-that we want or require that, uh,
rather than having a bunch of folks who've seen it on social media and- and profess to- to
have knowledge of it.
Teague: Agreed. Yes. Roll call,please. [Roll Call] Motion passes 7-0.
This represents only a reasonably accurate transcription of the Iowa City City Council regular
formal meeting of January 10, 2023.
Page 18
15. ARPA Shelter House—Housing Stability Pilot Program
Teague: Item Number 15 is ARPA Shelter House- Houses Stability Pilot Program. Resolution
authorizing the merit of sign a state and local fiscal recovery fund grant agreement with
Shelter House to administer the Housing Stability Pilot Program. And could I get a
motion to approve,please?
Dunn: So moved, Dunn.
Alter: Second,Alter.
Teague: And welcome, Tracy Hightshoe.
Hightshoe: Hello. Trying to get the slideshow, my buttons are not working. [BACKGROUND] I
know. Thank you. Could tell I'm not IT wizard. Alright. Thank you. I'm Tracy Hightshoe,
Neighborhood and Development Services, I'm excited to be here tonight to-to talk about
the Shelter House Housing Stability Pilot Project. This is a great continuation of our work
that we've done with local funding streams and our cares CDBG funds to address housing
stability. This is ARPA funded project or proposal. It also addresses the eviction
prevention under the ARPA category of emergent needs. As you could tell, the request is
for 1.13 million. Crissy Canganelli from the Shelter House is also here to answer any of
your questions. A little bit about the project itself. It-there's three main components, it is
a three-year program. Um, right now, the- the first one is coordinated entry, and this is a
critical piece um, for us. There are funding-right now they're funding that locally those
funds will run out. This will continue that coordinated entry piece for three more years.
We rely on our housing choice vouchers, a lot of our programs are by waitlist, our
Mainstream and Emergency Vouchers are not thereby coordinated entry. It's like
continue with care process where they staff and they make the- the interview clients, they
take the phone calls and they-with a bunch of community service providers, determined
the right level of housing intervention and make those referrals. This position will
continue that for the three years. Um, the second part is the Housing Stabilization
Services. So they'll hire two FTEs to continue to stabilize services. The Housing
Navigation portion works with tenants to locate and secure housing. So anything that you
need to do, arranging to see apartments, working with the landlords, they'll start
RentWise again,which is a program that helps renters have success in all aspects of the
rental experience. They'll offer eight courses annually throughout the program duration,
the program is not mandatory,but it is encouraged for all recipients. And both with
activity number 1 and activity number 2, these services are offered all for residents of
Johnson County and Washington County. The last pieces I'm really excited to talk about
is a landlord risk mitigation. We've had this in our plan since 2016. That's actually
implements this um, fund, so you budget your affordable housing fund 30,000 a year for
risk mitigation. We've not been able to utilize this fund for this purpose until now. So
Shelter House will be doing is they will provide this-this fund. So for those clients that
they're working with and they might have different housing barriers,whether it's criminal
history,poor landlord, urn, rental history,whatever it is, it assures the-the landlord that
This represents only a reasonably accurate transcription of the Iowa City City Council regular
formal meeting of January 10, 2023.
Page 19
they're working with that if there's excepts- excessive damages, lost or rent or legal fees
beyond security deposit that they can tap into this fund and we'll pay for up to $3,500.
We will review this annually since I said it's a three-year program, and hopefully at some
point we can expand this to all those- all those landlords who accept our housing choice
vouchers. This program is limited to Iowa City households. So be, since- since your
affordable housing fund dollars,you'll have to be Iowa City resident to take part in that.
The last component is the eviction and prevention and diversion program. So this
continues all our efforts to not go down that path of eviction. They'll hire two FTEs. Urn,
those-those- those specialists will work with applicants to apply for funds, to apply for
different programs. They'll work with the coordinated entry specialist to get people
housed. They'll provide that landlord tenant education that is needed. They'll provide
more outreach to landlords. They'll utilize the Rapid Rehashing funds to relocate
households. Ah, this is also a continuation of their work with Iowa Legal Aid, during the
pandemic they started doing legal aid clinics at the Johnson County Courthouse to
prevent evictions. So this continues that for the three years and the also subcontract with
Iowa Legal Aid to do those expunged clinics. Those are the three aspects of the program.
Like I said, all of it will-will benefit Johnson and Washington County residents. Only the
Landlord Risk Mitigation funding- Funding will be limited to Iowa City residents. And I
just wanted to-to note that the city is providing these services through a onetime
allocation of ARPA funds. So while this project serves Johnson County and Washington
County, once our three-year funding commitment ends, to continue that level of service,
we will need to approach other municipalities and other jurisdictions about continuing for
funding this program so that we can-that we can continue on beyond our- our Pilot
Project. And at that point, I think Crissy, can answer any questions that you might have.
Teague: I think I have questions just related to ARPA fund. So one. I think this is a great
opportunity for our greater community,but for ARPA funds, it was my understanding
that ARPA funds have to be used on Iowa City residents. When we talked about the, you
know, the- the partnership that we were in with the County, it was at least my
understanding that we couldn't do ARPA funds outside of the city. So I want to.
Fruin: No, I think that there may be a difference, Mayor,between like a direct assistance
program and really funding services. If you think about all the non-profit grants we've
done through-through ARPA,um, some of those services may be accessed by non-
residents as well. I think this is in that- in that same spirit, little different than a direct
assistance. We were-we'd be providing direct financial assistance to- to someone outside
of our community.
Hightshoe: We can confirm,but it's same thing with Community Development Block Grant
when you're talking about a public service as opposed to a direct benefit. You can
provide, we-we fund all of our non-profits knowing that they serve the county. So and
that federal program allows it,we'll confirm it,but I believe what Geoff is saying is
correct.
Teague: Okay.
This represents only a reasonably accurate transcription of the Iowa City City Council regular
formal meeting of January 10, 2023.
Page 20
Bergus: Tracy, I had a question about the Landlord Risk Mitigation Fund. You said that the
hope would be to expand it to all the Housing Choice Voucher recipients in the future if it
could be expanded. Can you just give us a sense of the scope of the current eligibility for
the first three years. Urn, like number of people that would serve compared to adding in
the Housing Choice Voucher recipients.
Hightshoe: Housing Choice Voucher vouchers without the Emergency Mainstream Voucher.
You're talking about 1200, 1300 households. Um, the people that are eligible for it. Well
let me get back to that slide. So Shelter House initially when we- when we start this
program,they assist any landlord that's going through a rapid-that are getting Rapid
Rehousing Dollars. Mainstream Emergency Vouchers, Permanent Supportive Housing,
non-profits with supportive housing, Crissy do you have any...?
Canganelli: I'd say about 500 [INAUDIBLE]
Bergus: Okay. So it'd be a big expansion. That was my question. Okay.
Hightshoe: We're waiting to see... so you allocate right now, it's 30,000 because you allocated a
million based on that distribution formula. So each year when you go through that budget
process, we would allocate another let's say it stays at one million. Every year during that
three years they get 30,000. Ah, we're hoping that we don't go through that all, that fund-
money stays in there. Um, so after tonight Shelter house can request that funds and they'll
minister that program. We might use our inspector. So like if there's a claim for damages,
we'd go out there just to inspect to make sure that it's a valid,the-the cost estimates are
reasonable, so we will commit some of our staff to doing that. But the referral is going to
come from Shelter House. Their properties would be eligible, so Cross Park Place and
501 would be-would be eligible. However, those claims, the city has to verify it just for
transparency.
Bergus: Thank you. That was going to be my other question was,how do we know these are sort
of legitimate claims?
Hightshoe: They have to be verified. So when- Crissy will have that education with all the non-
profit housing providers, that when they're placing tenants between our HQS inspection
or they'd have to take photos so we can make sure that the- the damages were done after
they got in. And then we have send somebody out to verify those damages. So all
damages have to be documented.
Bergus: Thank you.
Alter: I'm not sure I'm going to phrase this very clearly, so bear with me. It sounds to me like
based when you were talking about eligibility that these dollars essentially are there. Ah,
let me start over. Do you have identified landlords that you're working with or this is
really based on those who have need like the tenants?And then you're working with.
This represents only a reasonably accurate transcription of the Iowa City City Council regular
formal meeting of January 10, 2023.
Page 21
Hightshoe: I'll let Crissy answer.
Alter: Landlords to-to see if you can incentivize those landlords or the landlords who are a priori
saying Yep,We're in on this. I think I finally got my question now. Sorry.
Canganelli: For risk mitigation?Urn, so for risk mitigation, the proposal is that it'd be any
landlord that's collaborating with us,partnering with us and renting to these households.
Urn, if there is a need in excess of um, the security deposit,they would be welcomed to
reach out to this fund. So it's not necessarily the tenant,but it's the landlord. Did that
answer your question?
Alter: Yeah. I guess I was just wondering, in really basic terms, are there landlords identified
who would be part of this pilot project? But it sort of sounds like it's a little bit working- a
little bit more fluidly than that. It's about sort of your network of landlord's.
Canganelli: Right. So the first phase of our implementation of this is actually marketing this
resource to those landlords. But it is as Tracy said right now, this component of the pilot
is only eligible to those landlords that are in Iowa City. Um, so any- any entity, any
landlord that's renting to these households, ah, we will be reaching out to them and telling
about-telling them about this new opportunity. And that's kind of part of phasing in this
first year since it's so- so there's an educational component to it.
Alter: Have you found- I mean, it seems th-the existence of this piece seems to indicate that
there is a need for it. So you- even though you already have a network of landlords who
would be working with people who would be need lower barrier and entrance into
housing. They still might have some hesitations.
Canganelli: So there's definitely a benefit to having this as a resource. As the preceding
conversation about allowing to discriminate based on the source of using housing
vouchers as a source. So, ah,you know, from time-to-time, landlords had a bad
experience with someone that either we have recommended through Rapidly Housing or
someone that has a housing voucher that we're working with. And if this is kind of that
additional buffer to incentivizing them to rent to the next household, it's just really
helpful for us. Any tool that we can add to this kit to continue to incentivize landlords and
also those tenants that,um, we may be presenting,potential tenants that do have
backgrounds,um, bad credit histories, bad rental histories. This is just something else that
we can offer as a potential benefit to their taking a risk where they ordinarily would not
have.
Alter: Thank you.
Canganelli: And that's all data that we want to be able to collect and then present also in going
forward to, you know, argue for continuation of it and then what degree. Does that make
sense?
This represents only a reasonably accurate transcription of the Iowa City City Council regular
formal meeting of January 10, 2023.
Page 22
Teague: Any other questions for staff or the Shelter House?All right. Seeing no one,urn, anyone
from the public life to address this topic, if in-person,please step forth, if online, raise
your hand. Seeing no one, council discussion.
Teague: Well, I'll jump right out there. So,urn, what I'll say is there's- I mean, I can go a lot of
ways with this as far as-urn, as a,you know,person that is responsible for shepherding
over the city funds and- and how do we, urn, really meet some of our strategic plans and
all of that stuff. But at the end of the day, I,urn, can go through the budget and kinda
nitpick and that type of stuff, but at the end of the day for me,urn, if I truly believe that
housing is a human right,urn, and we have to get to a different level,urn,within our
community, even though there is certainly funding beyond, urn, one would argue,urn,
people would be recipients of this program beyond Iowa City residents. Urn, I think
because of that belief that housing is a human right, I'm going to support this even though
I can go through and kinda make arguments for, it needed to be a little more city-focused,
urn,because 1.1,you know,million is a lot of money that we're talking about from our
ARPA fund. So I'm going to support this because I really believe housing is a human
right and we need this partnership with the Shelter House to get us to a different level.
And this will be just one avenue that will help combat the- the- this- this complex- is very
complex, housing is complex, this complex challenge that we have and, you know, our
strategic plan talks about housing, you know, a lot and so I'm going to support this.
Thomas: Yeah. We do focus a lot on housing and it does have so many facets to it and I think it
looks to be a very well designed program. I like the pilot aspect of it. It's sort of gives an
opportunity to tweak and refine and learn from the process as it kind of unfolds. So yeah,
you know, kudos to everyone working on this. It's a really great program.
Alter: I like that it is working through incentivizing rather than it being,you know, the carrot and
the stick model. I think for a very long time in terms of looking at housing and there's a- a
real impulse to say you need to do this and so do it without there being much what's in it
for me. And this-this allows for sort of more of a partnership component, albeit,you
know. Yeah, it's cash on the barrel head but it really is about saying there's a benefit, you
will have your units occupied. We think it's worthwhile and I think that over time,that
incentivizing model can have a lot of benefit over all about how people understand
developers, landlords, etc. understand the need for a range of different models for
housing,particularly affordable,because certainly a more restrictive one has not proven
to work all that well. So I like this very much. Thank you.
Dunn: I would echo the thoughts of other councilors and also just point out, I think something
that was already said, I think it functions as a, urn, good response, a positive response to,
urn, you know, actions of state government, uh, you know, incentivizing people to
potentially get rid of people who are lower-income and struggle with housing
affordability. So I would- I would support this as well.
This represents only a reasonably accurate transcription of the Iowa City City Council regular
formal meeting of January 10, 2023.
Page 23
Taylor: I support this also, especially since it, urn, funds the full-time employees because as we
all know, the Shelter House has its hands full with its basic duties as it is now and so,uh,
to have persons particularly responsible and being paid,uh, to overshadow this program
is- is helpful.
All right. Roll call please. [Roll Call] Motion passes 7 - 0.
This represents only a reasonably accurate transcription of the Iowa City City Council regular
formal meeting of January 10, 2023.
Page 24
16. Amending the Budgeted Position in the Support Services Division of the Police
Department
Teague: Now we're on to Item Number 16, amending the budgeted positions in the support
services division of the police department, civilian accreditation manager. Resolution
amending the budget of positions in the support services division of the police
department and the confidential administrative and executive pay plan by adding 0.5 FTE
civilian accreditation manager position, Grade 24. Can I get a motion to approve, please?
Thomas: So moved, Thomas.
Dunn: Second, Dunn.
Teague: Moved by Thomas, seconded by Dunn. And we're going to welcome Chief Liston.
Liston: Good evening,Mayor and Council, Dustin Liston, Chief of Police. The Iowa City Police
Department has been accredited by CALEA, which is the Commission on Accreditation
for Law Enforcement Agencies since 2002. We've received seven accreditation awards,
we're in the middle of our eighth. And that position,uh, the duties of keeping us
accredited is currently assigned to a full-time Sergeant. He has a couple of other duties,
but he's gonna be retiring in a couple of weeks. And if you remember in 2020 on the city
managers plan to,uh,restructure the police department, the- one of the plans was to
civilianize that position, to create a part-time civilian accreditation manager, and this is
just requesting permission for that position.
Teague: Any questions for the chief? Hearing none, thank you. Anyone from the public like to
address this topic in-uh, if you're present, please come forth, if online. Seeing no one,
council discussion.
Taylor: I'd first like to compliment you, chief, and I know it was previous,uh,to your
assignment to that position,but the- the seven accreditation speaks a lot for- for your
department and how well it's been run and- and,uh, how they've functioned in our city.
Bergus: Um, I foreshadowed some of this on Saturday in our discussions,but, um, I'm not going
to support adding a half-time position in the police department. I appreciate the-the need
to centralize the-the duties into a civilian position,um,but I still I'm looking for the shift
and not,uh, increasing the overall budget.
Teague: Roll call, please. [Roll Call] Motion passes 6 - 1.
This represents only a reasonably accurate transcription of the Iowa City City Council regular
formal meeting of January 10, 2023.
Page 25
17. Amending the Budgeted Positions in the Support Services Division of the Police
Department
Teague: Item Number 17 is ammending the budget of positions in the support services division
of the police department Lieutenant position. Resolution a minute in the budget of
position in the support services division of the police department by deleting one full-
time Sergeant position, Grade 29, and adding one full-time Lieutenant position, Grade 30.
Can I get a motion to approve,please?
Dunn: So moved, Dunn.
Alter: Second, Alter.
Teague: And we're gonna welcome Police Chief Liston back.
Liston: Thank you. Dustin Liston, Chief of Police again. Urn,this is in line with the last item, the
sergeant that we're replacing with the part-time accreditation manager, we'd like to
change that position to Lieutenant position, and that person would become the
Professional Standards position which would essentially be an internal affairs
investigator. The current process for Internal Affairs for the Iowa City Police Department
is incoming complaints get assigned to a watch commander who is in charge of a shift of
officers. He does the investig-he or she does the investigation and then forwards it up the
chain of command. Those investigations are very time-consuming, can- can take upwards
of, uh,40-60 hours. And while that person is doing that,they're not really able to
supervise their shift as well as we would prefer them to be able to. So this will clear,uh,
them up to supervisor shift as well as provide a little consistency in the process. It'll be
one person that will do-be doing those investigations and I think it really had the
professionalism of the position.
Teague: Hearing no questions, thank you. Anyone from the public who like to address this topic?
If so,please raise your hand online or come forth. Seeing no one, council discussion.
Alter: I just want to,um, lend support to this actually because,um, one of the things that I know
has,uh,been talked about before I came on to council, and that was-um, and continues
to be an incredibly important, um, point of contention and- of tension,um, in public and
police circles is about, um, mentoring and getting,um, police training that they need and
support,um, so that they are, you know, making right decisions. And so I think that apart
from the fact of having a centralized investigatory internal affairs person,um,which
makes a lot of sense to me that to allow the supervisors to actually oversee their shift,
which as you mentioned, there has been a lot- a lot of new hires in the past couple of
years, some who have experienced,but more who are less experienced,that having that
kind of more hands on,urn, ability to help work with younger,um, officers, I think is
incredibly important. And is- while it is still functioning within the police department, it
is trying to help shift some of the psychology and some of the,urn, approach to policing
so that people who have less experience can perhaps make better decisions. Um, and so
This represents only a reasonably accurate transcription of the Iowa City City Council regular
formal meeting of January 10, 2023.
Page 26
I'm in favor of this position to allow for the shift supervisors to do what they should be
doing.
Teague: I see this as an opportunity for,urn, some of those investigations and complaints that,
you know, is kinda now going to one person who isn't trying to do double job- double
jobs, you know, in a way really does land opportunity for greater conversations, greater
opportunities to get to, urn, some interactions that really do change the dynamics of,urn,
some of the things that this community want within our police department. And so I do
support this because I think it is that move forward. Well, I know that,um, there's a lot to
be said about,urn, what the-what we would like to continue to see as far as the more of
the civilian opportunities within our police department but I think that this is critical for
just keeping those, urn,professional standards and expectations of this community, uh, in
line. Hear another no other comments,roll-call,please. [Roll Call] Motion passes 6 - 1.
This represents only a reasonably accurate transcription of the Iowa City City Council regular
formal meeting of January 10, 2023.
Page 27
18. Police Department Mental Health Liaison
Teague: Item Number 18, Police Department Mental Health Liaison,resolution approving and
authorizing the Mayor to sign an agreement with Community Crisis Services for law
enforcement li- liaison support. Motion to it- can I get a motion to approve,please?
Dunn: So moved, Dunn.
Taylor: Second, Taylor.
Teague: All right. Moved by Dunn, seconded by Taylor, and we're gonna welcome Police Chief
one more time.
Liston: Dustin Liston, Chief of Police. Um, this is- we already have an agreement with
community that provides us with one mental health liaison. This is,uh, another
agreement that will just expand that, expand our coverage to two. Um, it- it's in line with
one of the strategic goals. Um, and by 2028, you all identified a goal of getting 24/7
coverage with our mental health liaison, so this will double it from one person to two. So-
and again, we would make sure they're working different hours. So instead of eight hours
a day, five days a week of coverage, we'd have 16 hours a day, five days a week, and by-
by 2028,we hope to be able to have 24/7 cover- coverage,but this is a step along that,
uh, along that journey.
Teague: Any questions for the chief? Thank you. Anyone from the public like to address this
topic? Seeing no one, council discussion?
Taylor: I can't talk highly enough about this and I'm very much supportive of it. I was one who,
urn, talked about the need for our awareness of mental health issues in which has led to,
uh, our work session topic in February. It's just vitally, vitally important to you. I hear on
the news all the time or through the grapevine about, um, the suicide rate in- in the
community or just mental health issues,persons out there,uh, that need help. Uh, and it-
it's time that the discussion come literally out of the closet, so to speak. It was such a
under the rug and people just didn't talk about it. It was such a terrible thing if- if a
relative or someone you knew had mental health issues and- and it's time that we do talk
about it and,uh, our state has not been helpful for funding for it and so I'm- I'm just really
proud that our city will-will, uh, fund this and I approve of that.
Dunn: All right, I fully support this as well. You know, I- I don't think it's a secret that we have
some of the worst mental health,uh, I guess, environment for care,uh, in the entire
United States and,uh, I think in line with the strategic goals, this does,uh, a good service
to our community in- in addressing their concerns.
Bergus: I've been really grateful to see the work that Joah, the current,uh, Mental Health
Liaison, has been able to do in, um,responding to some of these calls with-with our
officers. I do have a question about budget impact for I think probably for Geoff or- or
This represents only a reasonably accurate transcription of the Iowa City City Council regular
formal meeting of January 10, 2023.
Page 28
for the chief. Urn, this is previously budgeted funds, this is not an addition-there's no
additional budget impact, correct?
Liston: Correct, and we've secured 25 percent funding by the state too as well for the position.
Bergus: Thank you.
Teague: Any other comments by council?Hearing none,roll-call,please. [Roll Call] Motion
pass as 7 - 0. All right.
This represents only a reasonably accurate transcription of the Iowa City City Council regular
formal meeting of January 10, 2023.
Page 29
19. Council Appointments
19.a Board of Appeals
Teague: We're on to Item Number 18, which is council appointments. Applicants must reside in
Iowa City and be 18 years of age unless specific qualifications are stated. We have about
five appointments, I believe, [NOISE] urn, and so we will take them one by one. Uh, so
the first one is gonna be the,um, Board of Appeals, Item Num-Number 19.a, Board of
Appeals, one vacancy to fill a five-year term, January 1st, 2023 through December 31st,
2027. All right. This is no,um,no gender balance and there was only one applicant.
Taylor: I would approve of him being reappointed. He's currently on it and he fits the
qualification as being- as far as being part of the Home Builders Association,which is
one are the requirements. So I'm fine with Andrew Martin being,uh, reappointed.
Bergus: I agree.
Teague: I think, um,just as- because he did have a full term before,urn,but this is probably one
of those,urn,boards where we don't have a lot of applicants and so sometimes we do
reappoint.
Thomas: We often reappoint to a second.
Taylor: Often for a second one,yes.
Thomas: so.
Teague: We often-well, I think my experience is we often reappoint if someone didn't serve a
full term.
Thomas: That's for sure.
Teague: But-but- and certain corn- I mean, it varies in certain commissions and, you know,
where we don't- I think we tried to s- I will use the term spread the love a little bit. Urn,
the service love-the service love, yes. All right. Now we will- at the end, we'll kind of do
each together,that's acceptable, all right?
19.b Housing and Community Development Commission
Teague: We're gonna move on to 19.b,which is Housing and Community Development
Commission. Housing and Community Development Commission, one vacancy to fill a
unexpired term upon appointment through June 30th, [NOISE] 2023, and,um, there is,
uh, no gender balance there. And we do have some people that applied.
Harmsen: I would nominate Kiran Patel for that.
This represents only a reasonably accurate transcription of the Iowa City City Council regular
formal meeting of January 10, 2023.
Page 30
Alter: I support.
Taylor: I would go along with that. Uh, also, I've- I'm familiar with her with some other,um,
boards and commissions and- and items that she serves on and she is always in
attendance and she follows through on- on assignments and I- I just think she would be a
good fit.
Dunn: I- I echo that Kiran's an incredibly hard worker, I know her well.
Teague: Any other nominations?All right, Kiran will be it.
19.c Library Board of Trustees
Teague: On to Item Number 19.c, Library Board of Trustees, one vacancy-Library Board of
Trustees, one vacancy to fill an unexpired term upon appointment through June 30th,
2027, and we have,urn, I think five applicants there. Yeah, five, and no gender balance.
Taylor: I liked what Joseph Massa, I'm not sure how you pronounce his name, had to say about
being an advocate for public library systems, that it's an essential resource for our
community, and has immense value for community. I just liked what he had to say and he
had a couple of preferences, but the library he said was his first choice, so I would
recommend him.
Teague: Any other nominations?All right. Joseph Massa would be that nominee.
19.d Senior Center Commission
Teague: On to item number 19.d, Senior Center Commission. Senior Center Commission, two
vacancies to fill a three-year term,January 1, 2023 through December 31st, 2025, and
there is a gender a requirement, and it is two males and one none,but we have two
vacancies. That's right. So we have- yeah, so we'll have to determine who would do kind
of an appointment vacancy and then we have this January 1st, 2023 through December,
they're all really upon appointment, but we'll have to designate which one would get the
none, I guess. If it happens to be a female,we'll have to get the none.
Harmsen: So how do you want to proceed with that?
Teague: I think we'll just take nominations and certainly you can nominate more than one female
realizing at the end there can only be one female, there has to be two males.
Alter: One of the people I was just re-familiarizing myself, so apologies for the pregnant pause
there. But one of the people that I actually do like is, Oh my goodness, As-Nancy
Ostrognai. She uses the Senior Center. She's been a member of Parks and Rec,Johnson
This represents only a reasonably accurate transcription of the Iowa City City Council regular
formal meeting of January 10,2023.
Page 31
Seats Commission, she has experience in ADA matters, so that's someone that I think
would be good.
Dunn: I think Susan Mellecker also looks like there would be a good fit. Been active in the
senior center before, good amount of leadership experience with things.
Thomas: I gave her a little bit higher mark on that one.
Taylor: I would recommend Warren Parris. He's well-known with community, been in the
community a long time and I think he would be a good fit.
Teague: Any other nominations? We think we need one more.
Harmsen: One more male.
Taylor: One more male.
Thomas: I had Jay Gilchrist as someone.
Bergus: I had him too.
Alter: Me too.
Teague: Any other nominations?All right. We have two males which is required, and then one
none. and we have Susan and Nancy that's been nominated. So I guess the question is,
where- do we have support for-how many would support Nancy?You probably just
throw your finger up.
Alter: I nominated her, so I will support her.
Teague: And who will support Susan?All right. So Susan. Help me, Mel- Mellecker.
Taylor: Mellecker.
Teague: All right, Susan Mellecker will get that. All right, I think we are ready to submit our
nominations.
Fruehling: Where are you plugging those?
Teague: Yes, thank you. All right, so where do you want to do the- let's see, do we know- so that
the people who left are all- they're female. So how does that work? If it's a male
requirement.
Taylor: I think it was two males, I wondered that too.
This represents only a reasonably accurate transcription of the Iowa City City Council regular
formal meeting of January 10, 2023.
Page 32
Fruehling: What do- I see what you're saying.
Teague: Their terms expired.
Fruehling: Well, and I think what she did-because there's also under the new,two more
vacancies. So I think we were taking into account because it's a- a female and a male that
have resigned on the new.
Teague: Okay.
Thomas: I understood this,we had- the two males could be 19.d, or I thought. I understood 19.e
to be- had to be the female, so Susan would be 19.e.
Taylor: The unexpired term,right?
Alter: That makes sense.
Teague: 19.e, all right. So we're going to go with 19.e, the unexpired term will be Susan, and
then Warren and Jay will be 19.d. All right. So I'm going to try to give this a twirl. All
right, so we've- Could I get a motion to appoint the following to Board of Appeals, Andre
Martin-Andrew Martin. And for that will be 19.a. And then for 19.b Housing and
Community Development Commission, Kiran Patel. [NOISE] For 19.c, Library Board of
Trustees. Joseph Massey-Massa. For 19.d, Senior Center Commission, the two vacancies
would be Warren Parris and Jay Gill- Gilchrist. And then for 19.e, Senior Center
Commission,upon appointment through December 31, 2023. Susan Mellecker. All right.
Can I get a motion?
Dunn: So moved. Andrew Dunn.
Bergus: Second, Bergus.
Teague: All right. Moved by Dunn, seconded by Bergus. All in favor say aye. [Voice vote] Aye.
Any oppose? Motion passes 7-0.
This represents only a reasonably accurate transcription of the Iowa City City Council regular
formal meeting of January 10, 2023.
Page 33
20. Announcement of Vacancies—New
Teague: On to items Number 20, announcement of vacancies. New applicants must reside in
Iowa City and be 18 years of age unless specific qualifications are stated. Senior Center
commission two vacancies to fill unexpired term. One of the vacancy to fill unexpired
term upon appointment through December 31st, 2020, and one vacancy to fill unexpired
term upon appointment through December 31st, 2024. Applicants- applications must be
received by 05:00 PM Tuesday, February 14, 2023. Can I get a motion to accept
correspondence?
Taylor: So moved. Taylor.
Bergus: Second, Bergus.
Teague: Moved by Taylor, seconded by Bergus. All in favor say aye. [Voice Vote] Aye. Any
opposed? Motion passes 7 - 0.
This represents only a reasonably accurate transcription of the Iowa City City Council regular
formal meeting of January 10, 2023.
Page 34
22. City Council Information
Teague; City council information is item Number 22. So this is an opportunity,Andrew,where
we just give any reports on various meetings attended upcoming meetings, community
events, and items of interest.
Taylor: I'll start I'll- I'll just like to elaborate on what was said earlier when the proclamation was
read for Martin Luther King. He briefly touched on the events and having attended
before, I'll- I'll share you're awesome and amazing word phrase because it really is a great
event. Starting- starting off at 09:30 at the- the Eastdale Plaza by the, where UAY is on
the south end of it. They'l- they'll start there and the brave souls will walk from there to
Mercer Park, which is a graded, it's called the Unity March and Community Celebration,
moving the dream forward. So that march is- is a lot of fun and then they make it over to
Mercer Park, which 10:00 o'clock starts off with some guest speakers and singing and
poetry and dancing, as well as free food as they had mentioned, cooked by Royceann
Porter, and if you haven't ever had her food, it's- it's amazing. And- and that's really a
great event. And- and what I've heard, which is a good way to phrase it, is that the kids
are off school that day, and it's- it would be a great thing for- for families to come out,
bring their children, and utilize this as an educational experience rather than the kids may
be just sitting at home and doing their iPods or whatever they do these days, come out
and have these activities and entertainment. It's- it's a great event. And then ending out
the afternoon at 02:00 at the Bethel AME Church, which is on 411 South Governor
Street, is- is a great event. If you've never heard the Bethel AME choir, and I know the
Mayor can speak to this too, and then also the East Union Mennonite choir,wonderful,
wonderful music. And there'll be speeches and a lot of great entertainment, and that's a
good event to 02:00 then at the Bethel AME Mennonite Church and with- and in
conjunction with the Mennonite Church. So try to attend those events.
Teague: I will just add, that is absolutely a great event to attend. But there are other opportunities
to celebrate Dr. Martin Luther King Junior celebration with-through the City of Iowa
City,we have Human Rights Week. And you can visit mlk.uiowa.edu. And you'll see a
slew of events. They started actually on January 6th with UAY having a event that was
really geared programming for the middle-aged to high-school students to come to the
public library and- and- and have opportunity to learn over there. And then there's
opportunities for speak, sing, act, and dance. That's going to be January 13th, where
performers can register at IC- Iowa City Public Library. But on our website, if you go to
that link,you'll see just an array of events that is just a great opportunity for our
community. I will just mention that Monday-no, Tuesday through the following, I think
Sunday, I will be in Washington DC. So I'll be at the mayor's-the US Conference of
Mayors. Tuesday through I think Thursday, and then Friday through Saturday at the
mayor's innovation pro-project representing the City of Iowa City. And this will be my
fourth time attending. Yes, one was virtual.
Alter: Well the mayor is going to show me the ropes with the innovation conference because I'm
going to be joining him for that latter part. So very exciting.
This represents only a reasonably accurate transcription of the Iowa City City Council regular
formal meeting of January 10, 2023.
Page 35
23. Report of Items from City Staff
Teague: If no more announcements, we're going to move on to i- item Number 23,which is
report on item from the city staff, and we'll start with our city manager's office.
Fruin: Just a reminder that you have another budget meeting, if you didn't get enough on
Saturday,we're back here at 02:00 tomorrow for the capital improvement plan.
Teague: Yes. Yes. Great. Our city attorney.
Goers: Nothing for me tonight. Thank you, Mayor.
Teague: And our city Clerk.
Fruehling: Nothing.
Teague: All right. Item number 24 is adjournment. Could I get a motion to adjourn,please?
Taylor: So moved,Taylor.
Alter: Second. Alter.
Teague: All in favor say aye. [Voice vote] Aye. Any oppose?We are adjourned. And welcome
Andrew. [MUSIC]
This represents only a reasonably accurate transcription of the Iowa City City Council regular
formal meeting of January 10, 2023.