HomeMy WebLinkAbout1993-01-05 Agenda
ir
'1'"..-
-
-
r -
.
-
IOWA CITY CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 5,1993
7:30 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CIVIC CENTER
410 EAST WASHINGTON
......._..._ . .~ y.-....._.........l In.-::...~._.-
_ _ _,.__ ~ ~l' ____ . ____
I~-.'
- ~
i
,
, i
.. - "
ll~r'"'~
'J
I
,
"
"
, .
..--f
-
'r" -
.- ~
- ~
J'-Ilr
'""]
I
,
AGENDA
IOWA CITY CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING. JANUARY 5, 1993
7:30 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
!IIl!tiJ5
llel#kr
!J,prlJ1?11Il
fJ1r7el1
tfr7 UI{/
Iftrr
l<!(rtr'lftt?1I4
/(It ~e.fd-kr
,
.,
ITEM NO.1. CALL TO OROER.
ROLL CALL.
ITEM NO.2. MAYOR'S PROCLAMATIONS
ITEM NO.3.
a. Martin Luther King, Jr., Recognition Day' January 18. 1993.
b. Bloo! 'Do~o\" !\lod1\ - 'J"hlul-V!t-' l~'l-J
CONSIDER ADOPTION OF"THE CONSENT CALENDAR AS PRESENTED OR
AMENDED.
a. Consider apPloval of Official Council actions of the special meeting of
December 14. 1992, and of the regular meeting of December 1 S, 1992, as
published. subject to corrections. as recommended by the City Clerk.
b. Minutes of Boards and Commissions.
(1) Riverfront and Natural Areas Commission meeting of November 1 B,
1992.
(2) Airport Commission meeting of November 24, 1992.
(3) Planning and Z~nlng Commission meeting of December 3, 1992.
(4) Planning and Zoning Commission meeting of December 17, 1992.
(S) Board of Library Trustees meeting of December 17, 1992.
"
ft Permit Motions and Resolutions as Recommended by the City Clerk.
...
(1) Consider a motion approving a Class 'B' Beer Permit for Pizza Hut of
America, Inc., dba Pizza Hut, 1921 Keokuk St. (Ranewal)
(2) Consider a motion approving a refund for an unused portion of a Class
'C' Liquor License for Johnson & Floss Entertainment, Inc., dba
Wallaby's Club, 130 S. Dubuque St.
(3) Consider a motion approving a Class 'C' Liquor License for Lohaus and
Larson Investment Company dba The Alrlln Jr, 22 S. Clinton. (New)
(4) Consider a motion approving a refund for an unused portion of a Class
'C' Liquor License for Three Elms, Inc., dba The Airliner, 22 S. Clinton.
(S) Consider a motion approving a Class 'C' Liquor License for Iowa City
Entertainment, Inc., dba Union, 121 E. College St. (New)
q3- I (5) Consider a resolution to refund Cigarette Permit to the Airliner, 22 5,
Clinton.
~
.:.;..J_
- -
....
r ......
.........I'"{'"~
, ~ 'W ........
-1
'.
,
I
,
Agenda
Iowa City City Council
January 5, 1993
Page 2
')3- 2.
(7) Consider a resolution to issue a cigarette permit to the Airliner, 22 S.
Clinton. (New Owner)
d. Setting public hearings.
(1) Consider a motion setting a public hearing on Tuesday, January 19,
1993, to adopt a 1991 Edition of the Uniform Plumbing Code as
amended. Said code to be known as the Iowa City Fiumblng Code.
Comment: The Board of Examiners of Plumbers has reviewed the 1991
Uniform Plumbing Code and recommended several amendments to
accommodate local practices and to provide for licensing dnd enforce-
ment.
e. Resolutions
([3- .3
(1) CONSIDER A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO SIGN AND
THE CITY CLERK TO A nEST THE RELEASE OF A LIEN FOR PROPERTY
LOCATED AT 839 ROOSEVELT STREET, IOWA CITY, IOWA.
Comment: The owner of the property located at 839 Roosevelt Street
received a five-year, no-interest loan In the amount of $2,500 through
the City's Housing Rehabilitation Program on July 29, 1988. On
December 28, 1992, the owner made a lump sum final payment. Since
the payoff has occurred. the City can now release the lien.
f. Correspondence.
(1) Letter from William P. Hoye regarding a parking ticket received at the
C~pltol Street ramp.
(2) Letter from May Kay McCune regarding a parking ticket received at the
Capitol Street ramp.
(3) Letter from Karla C. Sass regarding deer signs.
(4) Letter from Terry Vargason and Susan Mellecker regarding proposed
rezoning of property In the area of Market and Jefferson streets.
(5) Letter from John G. Savage, Superintendent of the Lone Tree Communi.
ty School District, regarding the proposed relocation of the airport.
(6) Letter from Lora Prybll regarding the proposed relocation of the airport.
(7) Letter from John McConnell regarding the Animal Control office.
(8) Letter from Terry Dahms, Vice-President of FIRST (Friends of the Iowa
River Scenic Trail) requesting an opportunity to present plans and goals
to the City Council.
~~."'~"'.'. _._._.....n.."lm~ L---'" ~iJiikl....-'-._._...--"--1IT"'--~-~-~.1WI.
t""
.,....-.
..
~ .....--
-
,
-
-~
.... - .....
Agenda
Iowa City City Council
January 5, 1993
Page 3
(9) Letter from E.J. Liechty endorsing the letter from Sarah Hanley and
Malcolm Rohrbough regarding dangerous conditions on Lee and
Highwood Streets.
(10) Lener from Hope and Gerald Solomons regarding parking on Mullen
Avenue, Lee Street and Hlghwood Streets.
(1 1) Memoranda from the Traffic Engineer regarding:
(a) Gross weight limits on bridge over Ralston Creek at Meadow Street.
(b) Parking prohibition 0", the north side of Hlghwood Street between
Lee Street and Mullin Avenue.
(c) Parking prohibition on DeForest Street,
(d) Parking prohibition on the west side of Lee Street.
~-f'L
o 0 ^ a.-w. f1A< ..tJ"..ll ('j.1)
( ~
&w.t /
I
END OF CONSENT CALENDAR
ITEM NO.4-
N%
(!(~l c (1)~A::f.p) t/~ ,
pf~ I '..hv ~: I /dMfJt:
~~v 6ft) abf.. (
PLANNING AND ZONING MATTERS. ~ ~. 4.;
a, Public hearing on an ordinance emending the Zoning Ordinance by changing
the use regulations of certain property, known as Lots 13 and 14, Block One,
Braverman Center Subdivision, located on Pepperwood Lane, east of Keokuk
Street, from CO.1 , Commercial Office, to CC-2, Community Commercial. (REZ
92.0014)
Comment: At its December 17, 1992, meeting, the Planning and Zoning
Commission, by a vote of 6.0, recommended approval of a request, submitted
by Ann Donahue and Southgate Corporation, to rezone the subject rroperties
from CO-1 to CC.2. The Commission's recommendation Is generallv
consistent with the staff recommendation Included In the staff report dated
December 3, 1992.
Action:
I\~ IJ-1JPJ /1H1J~
b. Consider an ordinance amending the Zoning Ordinance by changing the use
regulations of certain property, known as Lots 13 and 14, Block One,
Braverman Center Subdivision, located on Pepperwood Lane, east of Keokuk
Street, from CO.1, Commercial Office, to CC-2, Community Commercial,
(RE7. 92.0014) (First consideration)
Comment: See Item a. above. In a letter dated December 4, 1992, the
applicant, Ann Donahue, has requested expedited Council consideration of
this ordinance.
Action:
d'M<6~F/"'" Prl~"
%
,
.___.._.___.... ..~~._..._.~.....~.~H_~..._. .JJr-"
i.....~..-~.-:.,,_._--':.,_....~._--~_...;! If!OM
- ~. ~f'
1
I
I''''''~''~~' Y'
~ y-
114b page 1
Courtney/Movcd by larson, seconded by Ambr. Discussion.
Larsonl Darrell, did you hear anything about Ihat ot11er property
that is close to these.
Courtney I Monica.
Larson/ Did you hear anything about the properly that is c10sc to
these.
Moen/ We did contact that property owncr who has been aware of
this rezoning request. She may come forward with a request to
also rezone her property from COol to CC-2. She presently has a
use that's permitted by special exception in the CO-l zone,
would like to incorporate a retail use into her establishment
and that retail use would not be allowed in the present CO-l
zone.
Larson/ There'" really no compelling reason to hold this up and wait
and do this all at once, really. It's no big deal.
Moenl I don't believe so. YOll'd have to go through the process of a
P/Z recommendation so I wouldn't encourage that.
Kubby I That just shows that doing this sort of thing really becomes
creeping commcrcial, commercialism, in that- we specifically
want this bulTer zone in between a higher intensity use with
CC.2 and the residentialuscs, and by, I mean if we're talking
about deCl'easing that buffcr, when willlt stop? At first I was
thinking I would vote no on this, but because it's surrounded
now by CO-I, if we rezone those two lots, it feels all right to me
bccause you do have a fairly major street, Keokuk, blocking or
being an additional buffer. But I IVould not be in favor of
additional CC-2 going along the border and decreasing that
buffer.
larson/ Going south.
Kubby I Going west or south.
Novl Monica, which lot are wc refcrring to? It looks like just one \Vas
in the diagram.
Moenl lIIustratcd in the information YOll received is one of the lots
that has been, that was the originai application made by Ann
Donohue. And follOWing the staff's recommendation to the PIZ,
the commission had choscn to also rezonc the lot immediately
to the east 01' the shaded lot in the information included in your
packcl. So.
Novl Is this lot also owned by the same person'l
Moen/ It's o\Vned by Southgate development corporation that also
then requcsted that the lot be rezoned,
..-.........
1.~__
;a;.__...........---'!.;.l'~"
.~..,~.,,--.....
I
, '!
_M
I
I
,
.a!>!Wl'.Y.:lttUMlI;---..... .... ..
-....--u-..l--.-. ,__w_l'. r ..- ;~~
fi4b page 2
Novi Now we're going to have an L shaped CO-] area, righrl
Moen! That's correct.
Nov! And did we get any info,mation about why the person who
wants the CC-2 in this spot couldn't use some of the other CC-2
which is very large, certainly available?
Moen! There was some feeling, certainly location had something to
do with it,
Nov! Well. I'm talking about the illllllediatcly adjacent location.
Moen! I couldn't address that, as to why they selected the lot they
have in mind vs. the lot immediately to the cast.
Nov! No. I mean the entire huge CC-2.
Larson! Why couldn't they go into Pepperwood Plaza?
Novi The Pepperwood PU7a has vacancies and why not?
Kubby! There's somebody in back who thinks they can answer the
question.
~'Ioeni Yc';. And there was some question as to whether or not there
was really available areas within CC, within Pepperwood Plaza
to accommodate that.
Ann Donahue!I'm the one who's requesting it. And when we were
looking for property to establish my business, there's nothing
awilable in the Pepperwood location. The Magnifico's, the old
Italian restaurant, was the only one. And sq. footage wasn't
enongh, not for the retail space I'm interested in doing. We
wanted to be in that area because of the north south deal and
there's really no available space that is zoned, the only one that
Mace Braverman had that I looked at was the big huge spot
right in front of Econofood and he's not willing to separate that.
It's like he wants a big restaurant or whatever he wants but
that's the only size that there is.
Nov! The retail space that I referred to just wasn't enough square
feet.
Donahue! No. And Magnifico's at the time I was looking and now I
believe it's leased, was the only thing available then. And the
square footage is loa small. That's why I'm requesting the, I've
got the money down or intent to buy with the rezoning
consideration. Thank you.
Kubby! The only hesitation I stili have is that even though the use of
that property doesn't seem to be so intense that it would tear
clown that buller so to speak other uses allowed Cllrrently in
CC-2 either straight out allowed or special exceptions might
concern me. Like a drive in restaurant or something else. That
r
.. ~ 'V...
--
~.
-
~
-
l'
-
... '
~.
!/4b page 3
would distress mc. I will in the future be very protectivc of
that L-shaped.
Courtney I Any other disCllssion.
Roll caIl-
The ordimmce passes first consideration.
..
...~'
- 'I
I
, I
,-;
."',
. .'
"
~',.
-
f
-
.
I
I
Agenda
Iowa City City Council
January 5, 1993
Page 4
c. Public hearing on an ordinance amending the Zoning Ordinance by changing
the use regulations of a ~ertaln 15.1 acre tract, known as Pepperwood XII,
and located east of S. Gilbert Street and west of Sandusky Drive on Cherry
Avenue extended from ID.RM, Interim Development Multi-Family Residential,
to RM.1 2, Low Density Multi-Family Residential, for 6.8 acres, and to RS.5,
Low Density Single.Family Residential, for 8.3 acres. (REZ92-0012)
Comment: At its December 3, 1992, meeting, the Planning and Zoning
Commission, on a vote of 6.0, recommended denial of the application
submitted by Southgate Development Co. to rezone the approximately 15.1
acre tract from ID-RM to RM-1 2 and RS-5. The Commission's recommenda-
tion Is based on the lack of sanitary sewer service to the area, and is
consistent with the staff recommendation Included in the report dated
September 17,1992, and the memorandum dated December 3,1992. The
applicant has requested that this item be forwarded for Council consideration.
In a memorandum dated December 23, 1992, staff recomm~nds that the
Council continue this hearing to Its March 2, 1993, meeting following Council
deliber9tions of sanitary sewer Improvements during th udget discussions.
Y\.o cl>-u.e.../
Action: J-,
QfJO nlt'..J
d. Public hearing on a resolution approving the voluntary annexation of an
approximate 19.18 acre tract of land located south and east of the Intersec-
tion of Sunset Street and Highway 1 West (A-9001)
Comment: At Its December 17, 1992, meeting, by a vote of 6.0, the
Planning and Zoning Commission recommended that this parcel be voluntarily
annexed to Iowa City. The Commission's recommendation is generally
consistent with the staff recommendation that the property be annexed
subject to conditions contained in the conditional zoning agreement. The
staff memorandum and attachment dated December 17; 1 992, describe these
conditions, A memorandum dated December 28, 1992, from Richard Blum,
Chair of the Airport com~~~is~ln the Council packet.
Action: 1Jt ~~/ ~JA1/ , f/J1rt;'w/.J i ~
, ,(1/./ t1(fL4) -
e. Consider a resolution approving the voluntary annexation of an approximate
19.18 acre tract of land located south and east of the Intersection of Sunset
Street and Highway 1 West, (A.9001)
Comment: See item d above. In a letter dated December 9, 1992, the
applicants, John and Allegra Dane, have requested expedited Council
consideration of this resolution.
Action: /h (,~/ ~c--~..J riff) (g ~~j
~~) afft2~
- 'I
I
,
I
!t...Id page I
Courtney/ I woulcllike to open the p,h. Any discussion on this item.
John Dane/ -1082 Dane Road. I have a prepared statement that I
would like to read. I have a copy if Marian would like it.
(See prepared statement)
Courtney/ Any other public discussion on this item.
Nov/ Does the airport want to say something about 111is.
Courtney/ We had some discussion on this last night. Dick, do you
want to, for Naomi's benefit. She wasn't here last night.
Dick mum/ I don't really have anything further to say. I would be
happy to answer any questions. I know you didn't hear the
conversation last night.
Nov/ I understand that the airport has reservations about rezoning
this particular property.
Blum/ I think we really do need to address the six options that have
been presented to us by the consultants at 111is point in time.
We have planned a joint commission/council meeting fOf
February 9. AT which the consultants will be presenting their
final report and their final recommendation. The Airport
Commission will be meeting on the 16th of Februmy and will
have a public meeting on this subject. And subsequent to that
will present to you a report and at least some kind of a
recolllmendation vis a vis option #3. We will probably not be
able to wrap up the entire recommendation package by that
time. But we will do our very best to identJlV the priority that
we assign to option #3 so lllat you can proceed in whatever
fashion seems appropriate at that time. I did some s0l10f
pencil sketching. I am not an engineer. I can't really make
th~se kinds of plans. But it occurs to me today that if option #3
is viable and we want to reserve that option, there may be an
opportunity to do that and still accommodate this project
through SOllle sort of a land trade. I think there is a possibility
of making that happen it' option #3 is a viable option. But we
are not going to know that until we get the compieted report.
Until we have some opportunity to hear whattl1e public says
and moreover for the Commission to discuss it. Because we
haven't had that opportunity.
~lcl)! Mr. Mayor, I wouid, as per our disCllssionlast evening. Also
when we had the representative fromlvlenards here as far as
their time table. AI this particular time it did not seem to
interfere that much if sOllie other things take place that they
are going 10 be working on. By delaying the project it is not
';
-----"-----_... ..--......-,.-.",-.....- ---,,,--........ "
_.... ---.."'....M..
-
I"
_ v-
.....-. FIi
..'1!JlflFj
'"T -.-
~ ..~-
''I'" - .. ....
..~
lt4d page 2
~,
going 10 create a big hardship at this point. SO I would make
the motion that we defer the p.h.-that we continue ti1e p.h.
until our February 23 meeting and at the same time IVe defer
items E, E, and G. until the Februmy 23 meeting.
Kubby, Second.
Larson/ Do you IVant to open F. before you defer.
Courtney/Lets just consider the motion to continue the p.h. on its
own.
It has been moved and seconded.
I think it is appropriate that we take the whole package of
recommendations from the consultant and let it be presented.
See how all of the alternatives shake out and what order they
place them and then make our consideration after that. It
seems that it would be inappropriate at this time to throw one
out without hearing from them considering it IVould be one of
the ones for leaving it where it is at. I am not sure that the
county residents would think that would be a proper thing to
do until we hear the whole recommendations.
Larson! I agree. I have always been skeptical about the need to
move the airport. I am going to have to have that proven to
me. Ordinarily I would be very favorable moved by Mr. Dane's
arguments that he has waited his turn. And other people have
been allowed to develop. And he has been patient and not
pushing the matter. It is a voluntary annexation. I think it is
good for the city. But I just think it 1V0uld be irresponsible for
the taxpayers if we eliminated one option about the airport
before we have even considered any aspec' I)f the whole
airport question. It has not been before t;, "ity in any way,
'... shape of form. To do that before we 11Ieet w.. 1 the airport and
the consultants I just think would be irresponsible. I am sony
that we can't grant his request. I would maybe if Menards
hadn't said that the delay wouldn't hurt them that much.
Courtney/ They have got to file some things with the FAA anyway.
It will take at least 30 days.
l.arson! And the Board of Adjustment and so forth.
Courtney/ Any further discussion on continuing the p.h.
All in l~lvor (ayes)
Opposcd
_~A .~.... "-"L
-... --_....~~ -~-
.~ ' ....
n ____ ~ _....____.___._
I
-,~
..;!~
rr_"'~ .
-
-
T --
- -...
!f4e page 1
.JJ
l1bV/'"
Courlney! Moved and seconded (McD! f4H.l.l.r) to defer item e.
to...Febrlltuy 23-
Larson! My only question is will you be able to get-will you be able
to have some kind of recol11mendaUon about that option #3 to
us by February 23. If we meet on the 9th with the consultant">.
Dick Blum/ That is our goal. We are going to try to have a
recommendation for you. I guess what we feel is that we may
very well be not ready to say what we think wc want to do.
But wc may vcry well be ready to say what we don't want to
do.
Larson/ You can address option #3 anyway. Great.
Kubby! And that was my question.
What I wanted you to do was outlinc thc dates again and the
process. I\ight now it is kind of the consultant presented to
this task forcc and I am not clear, even being on the task force.
Bccause you said t1mt there would be a February 16 Airport
Commission mceting. When, if the task force will indeed be
making a recommendation-
Blum! No, the task force doesn't-let me back up. On the final
recommendaUons and report of the consultants will be
presented to a joint meeting of the council and the Commission,
The technical committee. Is that what you mean by the task
force. They are really done at this point in time. I am sure
that the technical committec will be invitetlto hear the final
report. But the rolc of the technical committee is completed.
After the presentation is made-the joint presentation is made,
the Airport Commission willmcet on the 16th, We have
scheduled that meeting for the public library Room A. It will
be at 5:30 in the evening. There is a home basketball game
that evcning. We will try to begin that p.h. First thing on the
agenda and put thc rest of the normal Airport Commission
business towards the end. So people who want to go to the BB
gamc will be able to still come to the meeting earlier at which
wc will receive input and try to answer questions to the public
about the entire project as well as option 1/3.
Kubby/ So it is a p.h, on the 1Mh.
Blum! It is a public meeting. r don't know if it meets-if we need to
meet all the technical tests of a p.h. But the public Is welcome.
encouraged to come. We will receive public input and we'll
answer questions. We will conduct what will to all intents and
purposes be the same as if it were ,I technical p.h.
.tr!----
..........-..................-...--...---.... .Lal&i I'm.. ~ -l[~ -1Iooi.~~-.:=ii _rltUI_ '.
f!I
-. -....-- 'r,w ~- ....... .~
J
!III'"'~~'-
Ill" ..
--
I.
-
__, _ I1V", ---
l'
-
..."""""W"
... ~ 'tIii .......
i
,., 'I
, I
, ,
--.
#4e page 2
Kubby/ One of the huge pieces of feedbacl< that I got probably at
least thirty times at the last technical advisory groups public
meeting at night was that people wanted a formal presentation
from consultants abmlt the options, how they came to those
conclusions and then have a chance to ~.s;: questions. That
people were very dissatisfied with having it be so infonllal
even though the reason it was infonllal was I agreed with
. entirely, was that in the past tile consultant had experiences
where when there was a formal presentation and then
questions and answers, a reII' people dominated the meeting.
Blum/ Well il' you got that comment thirty times, I got it 130 times.
And at that point I said absoluteiy we will have at least one
more formal meeting where people will be able to stand up and
ask questions and everybody in the room will be able to hear
the questions and hear the answer and that's what I heard.
Now I didn't hear people say they wanted to hear the
consultant say how they had arrived at these decisions.
Larson/ Well they can do that on the 9th.
Courtney/I would encourage them to C0111e on the 9th then.
Blum/ The 9th is open. It's an open meeting, right? It's a formal
council meeting and it's a formal commission meeting and it's
open to the public.
Courtney/ We're not going to turn that into a public hearing that
night. We'll have our own p.h. later but I would encourage
people to come on the 9th to hear the report.
Larson/ The consultant will give their report on Feb. 9th tentatively
is it? And have you got a time of day fixed on that, Ivlayor?
Courtney/ On the 9th?
I.arson/ Yeah.
Courtney / No, not yet.
Larson/ Okay, but stay tuned I'or that. And then il' they have
questions for the Airport Commission they would be able to call
and come to that meeting?
B1um/ Absolutely. And if we find that there is an insufncient amount
or time on the] 6th to hear all of the questions asked and
present the necessary answers, we'll schedule another one,
because we don't want to, you know, that second one may be
again a joinlmeeting with you because I know YOll wlll want
public meeting before, and p.h. bel'ore you adopt a final
recomlllenc!<ltion.
\,'
....._..___."....,.......... ___If.
Iio .i;!J--' :it...---.........-..-.....- r_'~_.~IIIo.,
t
-
'-.
'It'1I"
-
,- -
-
-
f
-
-
''''
G
lf4e page 3
Kubby! Right. And I'm assuming that that's right, that we will have
one in this form as well.
Courtney! We'll have a p.h., Dick.
Larson! We hardly ever spend $10 or $15 million without having
one of those. Do we.
lslum! But we may, as an interimll1easure, address what J call the
interior option 113 separately because of this pressure that we
all feel to try to help out with a finding on this request for
annexation and rezoning.
Kubby! Thanks for sticking around.
Blum! Sure, no problem.
Courtney! Any other discussion on the 1lI0tion to defer.
All in favor. (ayes)
Opposed.
_............._.W""...._,.~..,_."'..... ~---~~.--..-
~. llilhiiIlii;;liIBlI1lIIIl-
-.---
-.
1""
.. ~ .." "'-..
"1
I
I
,
v,
L '
- r
-
:,;;r"
Agenda
Iowa City City Council
January 5, 1993
Page 5
f. Public hearing on an ordinance amending the Zoning Ordinance to condition-
ally change the use regulations of an approximate 19.18 acre parcel located
south and east of the intersection of Sunset Street and Highway 1 We.t from
the County designations of C-2, Commercial, and A,1, Rural, to CI-1,
Intensive Commercial, or a combination of CC-2, Community Commercial, and
CI.1, Intensive Commercial, upon annexation (Z-9003)
Comment: At Its December 17, 1992, meeting, by a vote of 6-0, the
Planning and Zoning Commission recommended that the site be conditionally
rezoned to CI.1. The' Commission's recommendation is generally consistent
with the staff recommendation that the property be rezoned to CI.1 subject
to the conditions contained in ~; c~~ft~i~~eement.
Action: rtp'-U.l'n<.J! +(IIJJr/ ,f'ini4///) ~
17// aat?A)
g. Consider an ordinance amending the Zoning Ordinance to conditionally change
the use regulations of an approximate 19.18 acre parcel located south and
east of the Intersection of Sunset Street and Highway 1 West from the
County designations of C.2, Commercial, and A-1, Rural, to CI.1, Intensive
Commercial, or a combination of CC.2, Community Commercial, and CI.1,
Intensive Commercial, upon annexation. (Z.9003) (First consideration)
Comment: See Item f above. The applicants, John and Allegra Dane, have
requested expedited Council consideration of this ordinance.
Action: Jk.1.O / Y\ ~
I -
7:zJ
rltJ!/A) 'Ii
n QQ "1.Q.d)
h. Consider an ordinance to amend Ordinance No. 90-3483 and the accompany-
Ing Conditional Zoning Agreement of a certain 95.61 acre property, known
as the Whispering Meadows development, located south of Highway 6 and
west of Bon Alre Mobile Homes. (Z-9013) (Second consideration)
Comment: At Its December 3, 1992, meeting, the Planning and Zoning
Commission, by a vote of 7.0, recommended approval of a request to amend
Ordinance No. 90.3483 and the accompanying Conditional Zoning Agreement
by deleting Section 1.1 of the Ordinance and Section 4.1 of the Agreement In
their entirety and adopting In lieu thereof the following: 1} The understanding
that this Is In.sequence development as presently defined In the Comprehen.
slve Plan, and thet Ordinance No. 90.3483 and the accompanying Conditional
Zoning Agreement be further amended bl' deleting Section 1.4 of the
Ordinance and Section 4.4 of the Agreement in their entirety and adopting In
lieu thereof the following: 4} Basements may be constructed on lots which
are abutted by a subsurface drainage system provided said basements are
equipped with a sump pump and adequate foundation tile which discharge
Into said drainage system. Discharge of roof drains and downspouts flam
dwellings into the subsurfece drainage system Is prohibited, In addition, the
property owner's engineer must certify that no structure has an opening to
living areas below the minimum low opening (MLO) elevation listed for each
__.__________~. _____.___._ __....._..__ _1'\Il-.op;-_.>&__..-.."'............._..__..lfI'..u-"_...._..~-..-~"'-"'-E{r'",._r
1iJ
r~'!l~T.- 'i:l..-
- .~
... - ~ .....
-ll
I
I
,
r
....
-
.
....,.
-
r
--
'I
I
,
Agenda
Iowa City City Council
January 5, 1993
Page 5
')3- 3SS~
lot on the site grading and erosion control plan. The Commission's recom.
rTlendation Is consistent with the staff recommendation included In th~
memorandum dated November 19, 1992. Comments concerning this
proposal were received by the Council from the applicant's engineer at the
December 5, 1992, public hearing on this item. The applicant, C.B.
Development, Ltd., has requested expedited consideration of the ordinance.
Action: hv6 / tflAM-uJ dU/ e. (.//-1
I k~ 1I;/~ ~
I, Consider an ordinance amending the Zoning Ordinance to change tha use
regulations of certain property located east of Scott Boulevard and north of
Court Street from the County designation of RS, Suburban Residential, to RS-
5, Low Density Single. Family Residential. (REZ92-0010) (Passed and
adopted)
Comment: At its October 1, 1992, meeting, by a vote of 5.1 (Gibson voting
no), the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of the
application submitted by Plum Grove Acres, Inc. to annex and rezone the
7.08 acre tract from the County RS designation to RS.5. The Commission's
recommendation is consistent with the staff recommendation Included In the
report dated August 20, 1992. No comments we;e received by the Council
at the November 10, 1992, public hearing on this item.
Action: IP ~J /Jrw,), r + a /
~ !oft Kt :
j. COllslder a resolution approving the final plat of First and Rochester Commer- ~
cia I Subdivision, Part One, Iowa City, Iowa. (SUB92.0024) (50.day limitation
period: February 1, 1993)
Comment: At its November 5, 1992, meeting, by a vote of 7-0, the Planning
and Zoning Commission recommended that the final plat of First and
Rochester Commercial Subdivision, Part One, a two.lot, 2.88 acre commercial
subdivision, located at the southwest corner of the Intersection of First
Avenue and Rochester Avenue, be approved subject to approval of legal
papers by the City Attorney's Office and of construction drawings by the
Public Works Department prior to City Council ~onslderatlon of the final plat.
This recommendation is consistent with the staff recommendation included
In the staff report dated November 5, 1992, The legal papers are being
reviewed by the City Attorney's Office. The construction plans have been
approved by the Public Works Department. This Item has been continued at
the applicant's request, to the Council's January 5, 1993, meeting.
Action: ~/ )J~7--/" elf""') ilf 09
Jur) aIt~
~_._.........,..........._-_...~:l!t..........._- .-.-...----..~~Ja1....--~-....IVI"lr..--... ~'I.~/lOHk __~~
-
~ ~
.-
.Ii'~r ...... y- ... .,
'..
#4h page 1
Courtney / This will be second consideration.
Ambr/ Is there any sentiment to collapse.
Nov/ I think we collapsed once already. We voted on it-no on the
same day as tIle p.h.
Larson/ I don't have any problem with collapsing it. We have been
talking about It quite a bit. It is something that has been out
there in the public domain without absolutely no COI\1ments
from anybody about it and everyone on the council has made
up their mind about it. I just don't see anyone coming up \\1th
anything new at t!lis point. I would like to move it along for
them if agreeable with the majority.
McD/ I don't have a problem but it is going to take 6 out of 7 to
agree with it.
Courtney / I am seeing two heads go like this so. Lets just have any
discussion on second consideration.
Kubby/ Actually I wanted to explore something I hadn't thought
about before anclthat is-
Courtney/Moved by Ambr, seconded by Larson. Now discussion.
Kubby / Something I hadn't thought about before is that we are going
to have the sump pumps draining into the storm sewer and in
this particular development it is going to go into the wetlands,
correct. It has got the storm pipes ending up flowing into the
wetlands.
Atkins/ I don't recall all of the technical aspects but I am pretty sure
that is what we talked about.
Kubby/ I guess before the third consideration I would like this
information from Public Works as to how that a/Tects the
restoration or the wetiands, Having increased stol'm water-
Horow/ I asked that question when we first started talking about
this.
Kubby/Review 1'01' me what you found out.
Horow/ That was my thought too and Rick assured me that it was not
going into the wetlands.
Kubby / If you look at the path it has storm .,vater outlets going into
the wetlands because remember Lon Drake designed the
wetlands so that the outlets from the sewer was not just like a
point source just flushing into the wetlands. It would be
spread out and not have erosion problems at the point or the
sewer outlet.
l.arson! l.arry hiding back there
""'''''("-----,- .- .-.........
____H__
....
I
I
-:'-" "
~'WI_"
,--..
lI'r
-
~~--
~ ~
.
.
-
r
- -~.
, Ji~
lt4h page 2
Kubbyl That is the design of the: wetland. I just looked at the plat
again.
Lany Schnittjer/ from MMS Consultants. The subdi\~sion storm
sewers do go into the wetlands areas and the flow form these
sump pumps if you want to call it that will help to keep the
wetlands wet in dryer periods of time.
Larsonl There is a presumption that it would help the wetland but
not hurt it.
Schnittjerl The wetlands are use to having water and there are
certain dryer times that you really don't get as much and this
will help keep it wetter. I can't see any potential damage h-2re
if that is what you are concerned about.
Kubby 1 I know that we had talked at one point about the inlet from
the storm water sewer. The pipe that has to water flowing to
the wetlands might cause some erosion because of the flow of
the water. And then it was designed a certain way to help
reduce that I want to make sure that when we are at-that
agreement was made with the past conditional zoning
agreement We are changing that We are adding more water
flowing through that outlet into tlle wetlands. How does that
aflect how that is designed for soil erosion purposes or-
Schnittjcr/ for the most part this whole-and I haven't seen the final
design on the tile system or drainage system if you call it tlmt
But most of these will be four inch or smaller tile lines and that
is really an almost insignificant addition to the capacity of that
storm sewer system. You have a lot greater velocities at times
when there are storms and a lot more water coming off the
streets and what have you. This is a low 1low, slow 1lowing
amount of water.
Kubbyl But times how many lots on top of the storm water. I mean
I don't know that it would be significant I am!ust asking to
get comments. Since we have heard Larry, can we hear from
Rick. Although Sue is saying we have already heard from him
and he says it is not significant
Horow/ I know that I asked the question and I was told that it had
been taken care of. The design and it was not going to
negatively impact un the wetland. Because I had the same
feeling that you did.
Kubbyl Actually, could we asked Lon Drake since he d~signed the
wetlands and the outlet area. Thank you. Thank you, Larry.
.___~.____...._.~.____. '....-diIiiW;i .........
_...."'-'"i.liI!l1iil
.'r,.
,
-
" 'I
I
,
.!
?,'~: ",':;:;'~;~":-:,:'.":'~_:';:"',...::.-,~', '. ' '
,__.,,' ,-,r-'.:.------'~~~""'.,.
~,{~,~~~l~rrTf,r;.: :';)~~l:';./"'<.~l:"~:\<~~~~~~
_" ,~,,,L "~. .' ,--:,,';"'i""~ '" ... ',' . :,:-.'.' ',c;
,., ",-"" ,-, ;":).. ,', ',. ':. ':.-:,:- .. ' , .' . '." ~
.... ~ ,;:-: .~; ::";',.,.1 :,., :,;',"," '. ,,'. '.',....:.-,','~
, ,~:~{::
.:\
.. ~.:' . ,:. '" .
.. I
I
,
I
11411 page 3
Courtney I Any further discussion.
Roll call-
Ordinance passes second consideration.
I
i'
i
I
i
I
I
I
I
,
!
;"..'.""" ',t'
". I.');'" 'V../: ,'~;:'J... ," \ ,. \ . ~~.", .;.. .' " -, .
,:,:!__?:,,;:.:,j,,',~~"~;:):~',':;~~:2;:;;1~~!{~;:,:,-::,;":~~~_-'~'~~:::;~
,.".~ ..'",...'".. _..--: -'..,....-~ ",' ,\. '
;::_;':'::"I;:'~''''':]I' ~,;" 7::"[' '. :'/: t"'" ~-<",.-::.-, -'" .." ;: '; ~ ,.0;,,:,,:>",
,:,,'''--,{,,''-r :-;-:',," ,', .',-77'0'- ,.,'~'.,l...I'~ ....',' ;'-" :.._ .',-7'""" '..-':
..,,. ..,.,', ." ." '.iL.:" '--",' ,." ,'..' ,,,~
.~ '- --~:..::.. -'"-::.:'....~,~ :-_~_..~~-:'-~
-, -'j
I
, ,
#4j page]
Courtney I We have had a request from staff to again defer this-
McD/ I would move to defer. I don't know if we had a time.
rkl~ I Janumy ]9th
Courtney/ To January ]9. Any discussion.
All in favor (ayes)
Opposed.
"
"
--",,-
--
--..-
----.
,", -"",*--.11I;(_
-,--'~'--,,-.,....-~"
Agenda
Iowa City City Council
January 5, 1993
Page 7
ITEM NO.5- PUBLIC DISCUSSION
k ftr~
ITEM NO.6- Public hearing to amend Chapter 17 of the Iowa City Code of Ordinances (Hou~lng
Code).
Comment: The Iowa City Housing Commission, at its regular meeting of
December 8. 1992, recommended unanimously to approve the proposed
amendments to the Iowa City Housing Code. The proposed amendments would
Increase the level of fire safety for rental housing in Iowa City. A memorandum
from Gary Klinefelter, Senior Housing Inspector, describing the Housing Code
amendments was included in the December 15, 1992, Council packet.
I/AlAJ
Action: ...fee.; ~
s.e e,r.lrtV (1YlCl.4 q fJLl.L'M.. Cl-P Pea.r~~
ITEM NO,~-. ANNOUNCEMENT OP~ACANCI S.
a. Current Announcements:
(1) Historic Preservation Commission - Two vacancies for three-year terms
ending March 29, 1996. (Terms of Sue Licht and Kay Ireland end.)
(2) Mayor's Youth Employment Board. Two vacancies for three-year terms
ending March 27, 1996. (Terms of Carrie Norton and Rosalyn Green
end.)
,t<:: bruM~ ~3
These appointments will be made at the ~~ 1993, meeting of the
City Council.
b. Vacancies Previously Announced:
(1) Human Rights Commission. One vacancy for an unexpired term ending
January 1, 1995. (Marcia Ceaser resigned.)
(2) Committee on Community Needs. Two v&cancies for three-year terms
ending March 1, 1996. (Terms of Linda Murray and Lisa Oxley end.)
(3) Broadband Telecommunications Commission. Two vacancies for three-
year terms ending March 13, 1996. (Terms of Cordell Jeppsen and
Roger Christian end.)
--.......-.-...-----......-----....-
."'-'!r-- ....... ~ _~.U...I\_ ~~ .'"
I
#5 page ]
Courtney,' Public discussion-
~lm)' Lewis/ J am president of the Grantwood Neighborhood
Association, This is Jane Kliska, she is vice president. We and
other members of the Grantwood neighborhood Association
have come here to talk to you abut the need for a pedestrian
bridge at First Ave and Highway 6. We have come to you now
because the residents of the area need you to consider this
proposal as you plan for the 1994 CIP. I would like to present
petiUons and letters of support from the Grantwood and
Southeast students and survey results to you also, Right now
we have no safe access for the residents and school children in
our area. We have a highway with speeds of 40 and 45 mph
and the traffic light at Sycamore has a walk light that changes
too fast for most people to make it through and it is too far
away for most of the residents to use. If the students are going
to Southeast Jr. High use this light they are still faced with a
walk from Sycamore parking lot with no sidewalks which can
be just as dangerous as crossing a hIghway. The traffic light at
First A venue has no sidewalks to It and no walk light. The
traffic light at Fair Meadows has no sidewalks and no walk
light. If youlry to cross using the light you can't make it
through without it turning red. The students going to
Southeast have to rtm and if caught in the median they have
trucks and cars going by on both sides and a long wait for the
next green light. The intersections have a signil1cant amount of
pedestlian traffic a shown by studies done by lvlr. Davidson.
According to the study 70 pedestrians crossed at Fair Meadows
on Wednesday, September 30. 51 on Monday, October 12.
Some of the city council members attended a meeting of the
Grantwood Neighborhood Association which we discussed this
issue. They asked us to do a survey to help deiermine where
the residents of the area would use the pedestrian bridge if one
were installed. When asked how they presently crossed the
highway. out of ] 84 surveys that were returned, 56 walk or
ride a bike across Highway 6. 91 cross in a car or van. 56 ride
a bus. Some of the comments mdde to us on these surveys
convey the frustration feIt by a large majority of the residents
on the south side of Highway 6. They include: One person
when asked how he crossed the highway wrote run in capital
letters. One said they don't let their kids ride their bikes across
because it is not safe. Another said that they would cross in
--........---........-..-
.---""_!-.--. .-.----......
tI:...--......----~,
r
..,..
- ._- ~ -~ .... -- ~.~ ~. -. -
---
.(
'.
. "
,
,
".
I
tt5 page 2
the winter more often if a pedestrian bridge would be much
safer. A pedestrian bridge is much needed for a busy street
like IIighway (). Another said I wilInot walk across. Another
said I wiII not-! would cross more often but it is too dangerous
to take my six year old. Another said that we feel it is too
dangerous to ride a bike across. And yet another said that this
is a new home for us and the highway crossing was a definite
concern with no sidewalks at first Ave. When asked where
they woulclmost use a pedestrian bridge, there were almost as
many requests for Sycamore as Fair Meadows. After discussing
the options with some of the residents we felt that asking for a
pedestrian bridge on First Ave. would be the most central and
most used location. The children going to Southeast will only
have two streets to cross. One with a pedestrian bridge and
one with a walk light. The residents by Sycamore would not
use the pedestrian bridge at Fair MeadolVs. The residents are
Fair Meadows would not use the pedestrian bridge fl.t
Sycamore. But both felt that they could go the First Ave.
location and use it. A question was raised as whether a
pedestrian bridge would be used. If you dealt with crossing
this highway on a day to day basis as the residents of our area
have, you would understand the serious need for a safe
crossing. We surveyed Southeast and Twain students who live
on the south side of the highway. Grantwood students who
would go to Southeast next year and the residents of the
Grantwood Neighborhood Association and asked when asked if
they would cross using the pedestrian bridge, 140 said yes and
29 said no. The residents of this area fully support of
pedestrian bridge and are willing to use it and teach their
children to use it, The students are Southeast are willing to use
a pedestrian bridge also. Some of those students have helped
us with the surveys and petitions. We have given you
petitions of support with 465 signatures on them. As we were
getting the petitions signed it was brought to our allention that
there are a large number of senior citizens in our area that
don't drive and would use a pedestrian bridge if one werr~
installed. Now they are too afraid to cross the highway. They
are afraid they are not fast enough. After working with the
city and the students and the residents of our area, I can see
that the original plans for highway 6 were good and make
sense on paper. But for the residents south of Highway () it
..-.-..-.......-.............----
._"""
- J~_':' 11 i -----r..\.
':'~
--
""PI"" _
.",
r
-
-
.-r ...
f~,,_
,. .. '~'1
"..
'\ 'U. \ I'''' '~', '...I.'{;'..';,.:'" '"'' '::., I. . t.,.. \"" ..~-'~}.::~'.,:~..'..<:/..~.~
,,:::\:':",i:,',;,;:~L>~;~::,' ,!,,'':.:;'~ :'i';:',,', ~~i',!':.",':<?:';" ..' ':':,;,":':~,{, ,:':;
;)!i:hJ/~,(:,<k~/~~~:;':'::' ./.~,;:;r;:~~v
"':.:,': . _ ;. ~_ .... ~_. .r '
'I
,
,
'..
itS page 3
doesn't work any more. The area has grown and is growing
tremendously. We are cut ofT from the businesses, schools, and
recreational t~lCilitates that are all on the north side of the
highway. We can't cross on loot without risking our lives each
time. We can't have our children walk to scLoo! without
risking their lives. We must pay for school bus sen1ce that
runs twice a day and no selvice for before and after school
activities. We have discussed the possibility of a walk-don't
walk light with some of you and with the traffic planners and
the traffic department. As I understand it the city council is
committed in keeping east-west traffic as free flowing as
possible on Highway #6.
CHANGETAPETO REEL 93-2 SIDE 1
This has left us with no aiternative but to ask lOr the most
expensive solution to this problem. But it is also tile safest
solution, The children and residents have dealt with tilis
problem for years now. Now with tile growth in the area and
more housing to be annexed we are facing eved heavier traffic
on Highway #0 and more residents needing to cross. This
problem will not go away. People will not stop trying to cross
this busy highway. School children will stillnl'Cd to cross on
foot or by bicycle. We need a pedestrian bridge now, I have
asked Paul Davis, principal of Grantwond, to speak to you on
behalf of Grantwood, Marl~ Twain and Southeast schools also.
Paul Davis/ I would like to submit some 70 letters from students,
Call this easy reading. Some of them you will find very
enjoyable. I have talked to a lot of students this past couple of
montJls about cross walks and if they would use them. A
secret vote of 200 students at Grantwoocl in grades three
through sL'-':, 170 said they would use it and the other 30 said
that they probably would not. I have visited with a lot of the
kids in all three buildings. It is amaZing how many of these
kids are driven to school at Southeast. And a lot of them would
say that they would not. If there was a cross over the folks
would not have 10 pick them up after basketball or even to
take them 10 Southeast. A lot of them would ride their
bicycles. Even myself. I would ride my bicycle to school but I
do not now because I would have to cross Highway Ilfl. If some
of you want to see a scene. Illt the Broadway light about 8
.;
"
. -.--.............-.............. ~ 1"__~ .--......1;'""----
-
."
-
r~_
'(
.
.
l'r;
-.
#5 page 4
o'clock in the morning. you will see students from Lakeside
riding their bicycles and young stude11lS going to Twain and
you will see some Southeast kids crossing those lights on
bicycles and walking. I have been totally amazed that we have
not had somebody hurt or killed on Highway #6 crossing it.
j,-jary had mentioned the kids coming from south of Sycamore.
TW8in kids and some Wood kids as they walk through the mall
and through that parking lot. That, I would agree with Mary, is
as dangerous as tlyiilg to cross the Highway #6, Again, a lot of
these kids-we had a discussion when YOll came out for our
meeting and you were wondering if tile kids would really use
it. I tell you the students that I have talked to have said that
they would use it and I think you would see a lot of adults
using it for an access to the Mall. There is no doubt in my mind
that they would US2 it. I have talked to the people out at
Kirkwood and out at Coralville near the cross walk across the
interstate there. A lot of kids, runners, everybody uses that.
They said that-they have kids that instead of taking a bus will
use that cross walk. There is no doubt in mind that these kids
would also use it. And I would also agree with Mary that I
think the place to put it would be First Avenue. Ilis a straight
shot to Southeast and also to the ivIall area. Plus they do have a
walk light there on Muscatlne. I think that, personally, it
would be the safest. You would have to build a sidewalk to
have access to that but I think it would be personally the
safest.
Horow/ I guess my question is in terms of the students that would
be going to Twain. I think the First Ave certainly is a good
compromise if this were to be built. I guess I do have
concerns. What do the parents feel of those students who
would be goIng to Twain.
Davis/ I didn't talk to them, I talked to the students. You know that
they are concerned that it would have to have a walk up.
There would have to be a sidewalk put up 10 it. They said that
It would be jUsi as close to that because of the straight shot
when you cross the street. Some of those kids cross now down
'lt Keokuk and just cross in the middle of the road if you watch
them.
Horow/ At Cottonwood. They cut through the swail and go unto
Cottonwood,
___ ~lr..t t _.........~_.....~_._,'.__..-.._,_'......-
........._:.u_._.
I
,
,
~.,
-
".-
III
-
;;.<,--'~~<t,>,:"" '\;,,\:.;";!:t'! '.'. .'.'.. -~:_,;,~~::;::
. ". l-"' 4;: 'I"" . ,- "H"n::'.~:.':;"-.~ \ ~:.~~:,~.'~~.;.'~:'~~,..;.~:..-....
;;;:~': ':~:'" ';"iill'~l""t' )/-:" ,~;'5~{i'f'::(:'::F;':'~':'- <:. ,~: ;',::~c> ,'.:,'{.",..,~,:':,";E;J;':,,:j,<~iW
t . \ : -. ,~" I. 'I':, r.,' . ,),~_:I"'.:~i:.r ~I.~';."" ':,' ',. I.',; .::}~;'~'" .:'. ' ~', .-", ,~
\~:':",,' > t: . ,;,..,,' ..::.L~2.., >~',"\-;'..;~ :~:\>.:: :":~;:::.':" LP\""-,:- ." .;'. "'~:"~, n,'._.,,: ..::: . c' .-"~:'!!:
I
,
,
#5 page 5
Davis/ i\nd they also cut through people's yards and a few other
things too. So they said they would especially because a lot of
their friends would. If you watch these kids they don't cross
one at a time. Six or eight of them. They all kind of congregate
and come together, That is what would happen. Much safer.
Again. it wouid be much nice if they would build a walk six
feet or eight feet wide where they could also ride a bike or
have an easy access. They could even roller skate if'they
wanted to. But I think you would be surprised how many
would use il. My concern, too, is we are going to be growing
vety fast. They is already three homes being built right along
Lakeside Drive there. The new road. And another lot or too
has been sold. That is going to build up q~lite readily and you
are just going to have more folks trying to get across the road.
Horow/ But is there any possibility then that Grantwood-that south
of Highway #6 would all focus on to the Grantwoocl School
rather than Grantwood and Twain, Has the district discussed
anything like that.
Davis/ I don't follow you.
Horow/ In other words there wouldn't be any students that would be
crossing Highway #6 to go to Twain. I recognize that they
would stlll have to cross to go to Southeast ,md City High. But I
guess I am more concemed about el2mentatY school kids,
Davis/ Oh, I see. That I don't know. I don't how many of those kids
are bussed. They all can be bussed to Twain and I am
assuming that it would be simpler just to walk out and get on a
bus.
Horow/ With increasing the size of Wood-
Courl11ey/ Do tiley charge to bus to Twain from over there to. Or just
Southeast.
Davis/ Not the elementatY kids I don't think. Just the junior high
and high school. But some of those kids walk and run and ride
their bikes.
Courtney/Thanks Paul.
'~lrson/ I didn't have any question at ali about the need for this. It
is just a question about evaluating the different priorities in
terms of the budget. What things we can alTord and what
things we can't. What would we have to do without if we did
with this. My only concern is Jeff J}avidson mentioned in his
study that he didn't 1< now whether the school would take into
consideration a pedestrian overpass in terms of limiting bus
I:
,......------.--..
-........-...-.. -
-----"'- -"....~
'9l'f""'
.~-
-"
It5 page 6
service. I don't know whether you can speak to that or
whether that has to come to the superintendent. Butthat
would be unlikely wouldn't it that they would eliminate bus
set'\~ce because there is now an easier access. He mentioned
that as a theoretical possibility. That wouldn't be likely would
it.
Myrna Arner/ My understanding at this time is that the bussing
would continue for the Mark Twain children to Twain that are
living south of Highway 1t6. Jerry Palmer and Dr. Grohe are
both out of the state at this time and could not come.
Otherwise they would be the ones to speak on that. But I will
talk to Jerry when he returns just to have him send a letter
about this.
I am with the district wide parents organization and we
wanted to say also tat we do support the pedestrian overpass
and do agree with the selection of First Ave. and Highway #6
because it is the most straight shot. We also feel that the
children would use it and that the parents are becoming very
safety conscious at this time. Which in turn they are also
making their children more aware of it also. As he said with
his 70 some letters my 4th grader came home today and said
that we wrote a letter to the city council today. I am going, oh
yeah, why. And they talked about the over head pass and how
It isn't safe right now. It is something that my children are
aware of as I am sure most of the children are. I think thm it
is a good time. I think that it is a proactive measure at this
time. It is not a reactive action.. It's not going to die if you
turn it down. It is just going to come back up over and over
again. And if you have any questions please feel free to ask us
and we will answer them.
Nov/ I do have a question about bussing children based on their
distance form the school and based on safely being able to walk
or to ride their bicycles. This came up recently in North
Liberty. And when a sidewalk was constructed that was
considered a safe route to the school and the bus was
discontinued, wasn't.
Arner/ It has been discontinued, yes.
Nov/ This could happen here. You cannor entirely eliminate that
possibility.
Arner/ I don't know what the mileage is from that area to Mark
Twain. But you would be asking them to walk all the way
,....
.......-
-
I
-
Ir -
,:) page I
down to First Ave. and then back through the Mall which is not
considered safe at this lime. You are only exchanging one
hazardous area for another hazardous area, And as I said it is
my understanding that that has not been discussed to eliminate
that at all. And I am sure that the person in my position in the
future would fight it because it would be just exchanging one
hazard for another.
Larsonl Maybe we could get assurance from the school before we
have to consider this in the budget hearing.
Courtney I Yeah, that would be heIpfll!.
Amel'l Thank you.
Courtney I Steve, I presume with the advance publicity that this got
that it was part of your presentation on the CIP.
Atkinsl Yes, You will hear about it on Tuesday. And if not on
Tuesday then on Thursday for sure.
Courtney I Thank you. I appreciate the input.
Any other public discussion-
Jim Muller/1125 Seymour. I am here to ask the council what is
going on out on Jefferson Street. I would kind of like to
proceed with something.
Courtney/ Do you know what the schedule is at this point. Lastl
heard-has P/Z finished deliberations on it.
Muller/l couldn't answer that.
Courtney IThe chair of P/Z I think-
Marsha IJormannl My understanding is that P/Z has deferred it until
their January 21 meeting.
Courtney I I think that is what he told me.
Kubby I Could we have someone from Planning call .11m tomorrow.
Atkinsl Yes.
Courtney I We will have staff call you to tell you what the schedule is
now.
Mullerl How long will this go on. Do you have any feel for it.
Courtney I Tom Scott told me that the January 21 meeting they
would be passing something along 10 us. They have several
items.
larson I Would that be their second consideration or does it need two
or would that be their first. Just to be able to tell him when it
would be in front of us. What would be your prediction on
that. February-
Mullerl WiI! it even get t hat far.
-"'1---""'"
_--.0_
.~. J ~rr~-Il""-_~
___. ..J"~ ...___
'!If ~..... ..."
" "'
, t
,
, '
"'.-.y".,.. ~
I
I
, ,
1/5 page R
Courtney/ It can get that far regardless even if they deny. Whatever
their vote is it can be brought on appeal to us.
Muller/ Could I proceed with building some duplexes and not build a
sL, plex.
Horow/ E,cuse me but the last time we discussed this the agreement
was that there was going to be you would have a get together
with the neighbors and there would be an agreement reached
between you plus the neighbors for some concept of that
property.
Muller/ The meeting did happen but-
Horow/ You had the meeling but you didn't get any-well, can you tlY
again. I mean that-
Muller/ I don't really feel that I should have to Hy. There is also a
lot of opposition to the zone being changed besides just myself
now. There has beenletlers submitted to the Planning
Department petitioning not to have that thing changed. There
have been property owners that went to the last P/Z meeting
saying that they didn't want it changed, Before it was just
myself fighting the neighbors. Now there is a group of people.
Well, you can call it what you want to. I guess what I am
asking is could I build a couple of duplexes there within the
RM-12 requirements and salisfy evelybody's needs. I would
like to get going on it.
Larson/ r don't know-that was ./ohn's maybe disCLIssion but I think
that the agreement was that nothing would happen until we
considered their request. We could have set a p.h. that would
have established a legal and formal moratorium but the
compromise was that we would just informally agree that you
wouldn't proceed until we discussed this.
Muller/ But even the new zone is going to allow the duplexes. So
what is the hold up.
McD/ So what you are saying at this point is ./im, what initiated all of
this was the one plan that you came forth with. I can't
remember it. Was it a six-plex.
Muller/ Correct.
McD/ or the joining of two lots or some type 01'-1 don't knolV all of
the details. I can't remember all of the details. Hut the present
zone does allow ror the building or duplexes. Correct.
Muller/ Correct.
'.':' .'
\\.i
r --.-.___..,..__ __._.........___......_...; ..-
__.__...__.,.__. __ -~- 11---~W.""~ ,
- ~ --
,. I
,
, '
itS page 9
IvlcO/ So what you are lalking about at this point is just JJot changing
or JJottrying to increase your density by joinilJg those lots but
just building as you would what is allowed at this moment.
Muller/ And what J understand is if they do change the zone it
would still be allowed.
Larson/ That is what J am not sure about because one of the
propositions is the RNC-12, a low density neighborhood
conservation residential. Which would have design review
standards in it and so what he is proposing mayor may not fit
into that new zone. We don't know what that is. It is
something that they are going to come up with. And that
would be my question is when 've have said that Jim wouldn't
do anything until after P/Z is done with it and after we are
done with it. They :::'c 'lOW into something that maybe his
duplexes would be allowed or maybe they wouldn't. Depending
on the design and what that zone-
IvIeD/ Even if RS-12 zone that they were considering, duplexes were
going to be it. They were talking initially from changing the
zone from RM-12 to 1\..''-12.
Larson/ Correct. Now they have a second option. There is only three
options in front of them now. RM-12, RS-12 and what they call
RNC-12.
Muller/ Four options-not to change it at all.
Larson/ That is right. And J don't have any idea whether that
conflicts with what Jim voluntarily agreed to do. Is that fact
that we have thrown in the fact the possibility of a new zone.
Ivly understanding was that we could have frozen him. He said
don't freeze me J won't do anything untll you are done. Now he
is saying well what I want to do would go into the old zone.
But we are looking at things other than the old zone.
Horow/ Hold ofT, okay.
Larson/ I don't know. I am just-
Kubby/ That is the problem when we don't do things ofl'icially.
Larson/ It mayor may not be a problem.
McD/ We don't have a problem yet.
Muller/ There is no problem here. I would like to get it ofT dead
center and get going on it,
Larson/ J think it would be a violation of the spirit of our agreement
with Jim if we said no and go ahead and do something that is
allowed under the old zone now. I would like to do it for you
but I think it would be contrary to what we talked about.
~ -
-
t ~,.
-....
'If' ~ ,.:1IIil',-
" I
I
,
ItS page 10
~lcD/ If they are going to be talking about this. I am assuming with
what has been discussed at the P/Z level, Jim. There is going to
be a decision reached at that January meeting.
lvlullerl What happens if the zone isn't changed.
McDI If the zone isn't.
Muller/ Right.
Larson/ They don't it. They just recommend to us to change it or not.
They might say leave it aione and then the neighbors convince
us to change it to RNC-12.
McD/ They have to option of coming in and asking us.
Larson/ We meet on February 1 st.
Courtlleyl They can appeal-the neighbors can appeal the decision of
the P/Z Commission.
Muller/When is the p.h. set. Is there going to be a p.h.
McD/ If there is a change that is going to be proposed. If there is a
change that is going to be proposed there has to be a p.h.
larson I If they discuss it on Janumy 21, it would be on our agenda
to set p.h. on February 1.-2. Informal on the 1st and the
formal on the 2nd.
Courtney I So then the p.h. would be on the 23 of Februmy and we
theoretically could take the first vote on that night, too.
Larson/ I sure wouldn't have any problem doing that but you can
see your two months.
Mullerl Okay. Thanks,
Courtney I Any other items for public discussion-
Mill r .-...- ...~..
'1MIll!l!l.'-~--""'- ~_....--
--~.
-!iII_r~,_,~_
" "
I
"
#6 page 1
"
Courtney/ I would like to open the p.h. on this item.
Kubby / Here comes Gary with all of his stuff.
Larson.! Then this ordinance will be on our agenda next time.
Courtneyl Yeah.
Kubby/ Gary, \Vould you come up and show us that box.
larson.! You don't have to have a box like that.
COUrlney I I thought it \Vas a lot bigger than that,
Gary Kline/elderl This is an approved tamper proof cabinet The
simplest, cheapest kind available. You can even get them in
designer colors. You GUl get them recessed. You can get them
\Vith mirror glass.
Horow/ You don't necessarily have to put them up and down. You
can put them in side ways as well,
Klinefelderl They have to venical. .
Horow/ But you could put something on top of it, right.
Larson/ You could make kind of a camp thing out of it. I think it
would be nice.
Klinefelder/ You can wall mount this.
Courtney I Does it have to remain painted red.
Horow/ No. There are designer colors.
Courtneyl Do like they did with the newspaper vending machines on
the mall.
Kubby I So the theory is that you break the glass and get the fire
extinguisher. Is it illegal to keep the key in it so instead of
breaking the glass you open it up and get it so you don't have
glass all over your house.
Andy Roccal (can't hear)
Kubbyl So I can't have a beaded fringe thing over it to hide the box.
Okay.
Larson/ You can 364 days a year, You just can't the day they come
look at it.
Novl Before you sit down r have a question.
Kubbyl Th,Ulks for bringing that in.
Novl When the smoke detectors are put in, are they reqllired to be
wired mUleI' than battery operated.
Klinefelder I Only in new construction. New construction or
remOdeling which would require a bUilding permit. On an
existing bUilding in the case where new smoke detectors would
be required, they could be battelY, We would prefer them to
be hard Wired but a battery is cerlainly satisfactory.
,/';'\ .
,.;."
" ,
,",
..:..
':""'>,""
""c, :",.',
"
.'-,",' .
I':,
. ~---""''',",~,.".:.~~......."..._._,.~...,--. "."" '.
, .
,.,',-
,',,'
-- ..._-.-~.--_..-
,......---
--~--_...__. .....,
~r~'... - ......._.
lIl.
,
,
",
,.,-' "
I
'-." ..
, ':_: ,l:'...,.~,?;.",('"~.~;;',:",',, .,' '
.. .... ...... ......:;'.':.;.,...:'....",
~~q;I':Z\',l;',I: :"~::;t2f:";'
',.." ,.81. ,:....f.. ~.: ::':1: ,',
-- . ).,,'~.'
;'"
..~, '.
"
....' ,
J!6 lXlge 2
......i
.1: .
" ,.,~::',;ir<'?t::,' , ,',;', ..'
.:.:;: ',....'."'; f"":':': "',, :"" ';""""""":'-""""~""",.,,,,"-,.,",':':,'"',.".'..,:,:.'g,'"","~.,',.'~...;:,,!T,~:;(~1~
:,,',:,'" ,:,":".~.;'!:""',:,:,~ .,',','),:',":,':~,' ::'-. . -.. . " ;.' .. ,"~I .. ' ..,...... '
.;i'-:~i~~..;-)~:.
:,' ~.; _.',",,' ,:;".;', ',,: ":'~.',.',,'.',.t". ',' ..!. " .....,-:, ,....., .. I .'
.. .. .. -' ~:,.;'~,::,.,~~~:,.: _.: ;,;. ',;'.':',':',-~
"',' ',; :....:,:,:'"',
I
,
. ,
Nov/ I am not sure it is in a dormitory situation. I think the
batteries may be used for other things. Klinefelder/ I can't
really address the dOrInitOlY situation except in terms of
fraternities and sororities that are consider dormitory type use.
They ,u'e required to have not only a central alarm system but
individual smoke detectors within each room. Alarm system is
a fully supervised system that had battelY back up in case of
loss of power. They are sophisticated systems.
Larsoni And they are electrical.
Klinefelder/ Yes. lclectl;cal and VC battery back up both.
Larson/ It was just a balancing act. You felt to make evelY rental
hOUSing property in Iowa City go in and wire their smoke
detectors was just too much to ask at this point.
Klinefelder/ Properly maintain~d bat tery smoke detector will
accomplish the s<une thing.
Larsoni I agree wit h you.
Kubby i Keep having those change your clocki change your batlelY.
Klinefelder/ They even tell you when the batlelY is going bad. A
little noise.
Nov/ I understand about that idea. I just thought that if you are
dealing in a student population, your baltery lveCU'S out on
something else and the smoke detector battery is very
convenient.
Klinefelder/ That is a maintenance issue that I am afraid is always
going to be there. Short 01' requiring hard wired smoke
detectors which is significant expense.
Nov / At least they are required in new construction.
Klinefelder/ Yes. lIardwired and a battery back up both,
combimllon.
Ambr/ Don't most of them use a nine volt batlelY. It isn't
interchangeable with too many stereos.
Klinefelder/ There arc less and less items that use a nine voll.
Courtney/Thank you.
Max Yocum/ Could I say something now. I guess last week or
something like that. I still own this Quonset house down here
by the ball diamonds and there was a-oh, that gentleman that
just left. lIe went down 10 the Capitol Propane Company and
told them not to put any propane in my tank and so therelbre
the water froze up and busted pipes in my house down there
and me and your city manager had a little misunderstanding,
I
I
I
I
'I
. I ,
I' .
L...._,_,._......,_...._. ,
-
r ~----~--
t~t:~>.'Y/::c>'( ,";,!,~' ~~:~_:",:":':'(~ ::~,::,:,::::":~ :,',," .:,:~, "~~::~"~~:'\::},:t~':::"i;:,
~\:~~l ;'l'!~' ~ <;:~t, I~,~t:f:-;"~~:l~~: T~:' '~~' ,=~~~ 7::;c;.'::,:
1.'..',_, ,- ""I'I~.._.."""I " " ',,~
......:";,.1.;" ,',' ...:....:.r'! .....;;.. .,..',', .', ";1. ,t, :', . , "I . ,,' :', .--,~.... 'J,
116 page ,,,!
too, about ~j()me things, And I am getting damn sick and tired
of this kind of canyings 011. No\\'.
Courtney I Ma:\, does this have to do \\1th the item that we are
considering n Chapter 17. We are talking about some
amendments to the housmg code for f1re silfety.
Yocum/ Oh, I thought that you had finished that.
Courtney/No, We have already passed the public discussion item.
Yocum/ Are you telling me that-
Courtney/ I don't \\'ant to hear comments on this during this p.h. It
is not pertinent to this subject.
Yocum/ Is the p.h. over.
Courtney / Tlus is a p.h, on the amending the housing code. It doesn't
have anything to do with your problem. Let me finish this.
Yocum/ I thought you had.
Courtney/Any other public discussion on rhis item.
Andy Rocca/ I believe last night Gary Klinefelder addressed council
infol111ally regarding some of the proposed amendments and [
think he also gave you background regarding about the 18
months that we have been working on some of the Greek
houses in the city. Some 45 inspections that have been
conducted. It has been my expeliences as a fire marshal for
the last year and a hall' of working closely with the University
of Iowa resident services in conducting fire drills within the
residents halls that the student population typically is going to
react in an emergency situation just as they do when they
practice. Or they will perform a little more effectively
practicing a fire drill and so also in the amendments that we
are proposing to conduct fire drills within the Greek houses in
Iowa City. And for those very reasons and I just wanted 10
point that out to you. If you had any questions for me I would
be willing to answer them at this time.
Horow/ The only question I had last night had to do with who did
the certification of the qualified alarm technician and that was
answered.
Andy Rocca/ Okay. Very good. Anything else. Thank you.
Courtney / Any other public discussion on this item.
I close the p.h,
Now Max.
Max Yocum/ This property down on the Sand Road there. A bunch of
that property has been sold for development and they bought
the property where my Quonset house sits and stull like that
-~~,.
....._....._.. ....... Jl
.-
.
,
I
, '
14.. -~
-
-...-._-
-
r -
.. I.. 5'"
If(l page-+
and that stuff h,~s all gOl to go out. And, but Mr. Kline/dder
who just left-he wrote a letter down to the. I thought I had a
copy or it in my pocket but [don't find it. lie wrote a letter
down to the Capitol Oil Co. and told them not to put any rue! in
my tank down there.
Larson/ Why is that, Mm', Why he wrote the letter.
YOCllm/ I don't knOl\'. I thought he just wanted to create me some
problems.
l.arson/ Give me a real reason. I am sure you know what it is,
McD/ Randy, Mr. Yocum brought me a copy of the letter and I
remember it was about a one paragraph letter and this was a
few weeks back and he stopped in to see me one day and we
talked about it and I did do some checking on it. This was not
initiated by ILLS. This stem rrom a court order that the house
was not to be occupied and-
Larson/ Were we in a position 01' having to enforce that order as city
staff.
McD/ My understanding II.I.S. asked for this. The court considered it
and the court issued the order that this house was not to be
occupied und2r present conditions and a letter was sent to the
propane company stating that because of the court order this
house liaS not to be occupied and that is how this has come
about.
Kubby / But having the utilities and having to be not occupied seems
to be two different things. .lust because you, if you want to heat
your pipes up so they don't burst, it may not mean that there
was going to be someone inhabiting that building while there
was enough heat there to keep the pipes,
Larson/ It may be a first that I'm going to agree with you Mr. Yocum,
hut I don't think that that's proper but I don't know enough
details to put a judgment on it. But if the court wants to issue
an order then the court ~hou[d enrorce its order or the sherll'f
should or the police department or inspection services if that's
proper. But this isn't the arena 1'01' us to judge it because we
don't knolV any 01' the hlCtS. But from what [ hear, I don't care
for that way of doing things. If the court want to, il' the city
wants to make sure the court order's being followed, they
should make sure it's being I(Jllowed, but I don't see the
connection in terms or shutting off the utilities.
McD/ I don't understand the legal ramifications as far as a court
order, but that is what is stated in the letter.
'~..., -- ~.... ....M'---y...m.~--,...._..
""at
_'"'_I.~lOtt.WAA4--'_\.Ac.tlr..,
. '4.-'!1' .... ~iiillllllll
.."
-
-
.- ~
~'~'.~",;-'>' "i.:;~~5:~:~-1 ~>::," ,;,;,~",~.'.:'-'"'~:'~ :f:~~~Jff;f
~" '"' '"" "'" J'''' """,,"; ',''''
" ",~; "r~,"i/';':J;";: .," ~....( ,'?)~/;"'~'/ ... .;;.S.'::t~.,i,_~L\':::,':;~
;",;,~"",_:""',:',~'"":"""'..::.,.~,',.,,,, .;, ,. \ t.,:." 'Ji;d!.7: "l"""'""~"'''' ~~. f"'rt.._w,wM-lwM,:",M, ~ .' ....;->-."~, ~-.....---
'. < ..-:." :U~'"f+_'. Qf:'i:2,(...~~-~:~~'"\~'i':,,:.,,,/~~-::,:,:- <, '" '.:,"'l~'
'I
,
, '
116 page 5
l.arson/ I don't want to prejudge it, but I want to tell you again that
[ never think it suits your purposes to come and tell us about
these things. This is not the level at which we know anything
about these things. [I' you'd go to stall aed ask them to present
them to us or call one of us indi\1dually so we can find
something out about it before it comes to us which ruaybe
you've done with John. We just can't reac~ to it because we
can't evaluate it. We don't have any information about it.
Yocum/ Well, [ just wanted you to know what happened. But the
property has been sold and I had the house inspected this
summer and I put the, fL'\ed the broken window or two in it.
i\nd I fixed all that stuff, stuff like that. But I don't think
anybody has the right to come down and, they took a letter
down to the propane company and told them not to put any
fuel in my tank,
larson/ That's what I'm saying. On the surface of it, I don't think
that's the proper way either. But I want to hem' the cities side
of it before we judge it. I'd be glad to check into it and check
into it and get back to you. I just don't think.
Courtney/Can we get something from HIS on the process that tlJ.is
went through?
larson/ If anytlJ.ing should of gone, maybe it should have been the
court order rather than a letter, but can we get back to you on
it?
YocU!'l/ Well you're going to have to do it pretty quick because I'm
gdng to South America in a few clays,
Larson/ You do that every now and then don't you.
Yocum/ Yes. And ['m certainly going this winter. And there's a, you
can't believe the peoples that's going down there since [ started
going. I could name you off about 15 that's going to go within
the next couple of weeks.
larson/ Thank you.
I,",,' ,,'
..lJI"i"''I'...... ---....---......,.---
....Hl'!_.....~_r_
__llU"""_n~"11fI"'1lI. _"'* )
-
l'
~
Agenda
Iowa City City Council
January 5, 1993
Page 8
(4) Design Review Committee - One vacancy to fill an unexpired term ending
July 1, 1995. (Term formerly held by Kay Irelan.)
I
These appointments will be made at the January 19, 1993, meeting of the
City Council.
ITEM NO.8- CITY COUNCIL APilOINTMENTS.
a. Consider an appointment to tha Board of Examiners of Plumbers for a
representative of the public for a two.year term ending December 31, 1994.
(Mike Dreckman's term ends.)
Action:
Ro n.riJ'I',di.{')
b. Consider a recommendation to the Board of Supervisors that Jan Hubel be
reappointed to the Riverfront and Natural Areas Commission for a three.year
term ending January 1, 1996,
Action: ~u1J ~ AO.....
a.f2kl ,.u~
c. Consider appointments to City Council Committees:
i
, .
~/t;{ft)
.oft#f
(1) Legislative Committee (Currently serving are Randy Larson, William
Ambrisco, John McDonald and Karen Kubby.)
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I.
i
,
i.
i
Action: --.100) F)
~t&
~~ A-wJ~
I .
(2) Rules Committee (Currently serving are William Ambrlsco and John
McDonald.)
Action:
~-l-~
(3) Civil Defense Commission (Susan Horowitz Is currently serving.)
Action:
~
(4) Convention and Visitors' Bureau (Darrel Courtney Is currently serving.)
Action:
~
."--'M"'~"--'---~-""-----'r""'-''''-
........--...
.-. _.._-~.
-
.
Agenda
Iowa City City Council
January 5, 1993
Page 9
(5) Council Representative to CCN (Karen Kubby is currently serving.)
Action:
~I~
(6) Johnson County Council of Governments (Currenlly serving are William
Ambrisco, Naomi Novick, Karen Kubby, Susan Horowitz, Randy Larson,
with Darrel Courtney and John McDonald as alternates.)
Action: A-nJ, I 1lwi Jh~/ ~ I ,&.....w..o-u...J
~ 'Y )}L c/).. a.o ~-j--",-
ITEM NO. 9 -~ ~INFORMATION. ,
xIE/./ ~./
ITEM NO. 10. REPORT ON ITEMS FROM THE CITY MANAGER AND CITY ATTORNEY.
a. City Manager.
~(J-/ ~)
b. City Attorney.
-f)-
.
I
,
,
";
.,,:-,.,. ,,'.'
;,:Y';/!'::;'~:::,:"Z.;/:..::,,',:::<~::,:;:, ~~;"~,-:,..., ,,,.:..~."';/' " ,
/l""""f~l':""'i:'::"" ':,."",:" ,':' "'~
t~':~~;,;, ...:' I." /:,' (I :"'l":v::', ..'i-/ ,~':, ,,:,:," '~,": :;',,: "C,;
".:'.';:...' ,.',..... ......,' ,l.'o,' ~I"r":'t~c:.~' I,.','~ '" ."
" . "_.,!., ,i:. '.0:" .,::~~.",\ ; :'.~:}'_" ',:" ' ,-' ::" " , ,," " ':
,'" _ ".>.:'>' ,,;,::::';.: "!"-' .t~~'I.,~,,~.~>:::
....o'", ::i_';;'\'~:';\;,,:
11"(" (
,,0.. )
page!
Courtney;'
Larson/ That's where the action is, right there.
Kubby 1 Although I would like to request all the legislative
committee that when there are, Bill, being on that commit tee
last year, we never met as a committee unless there was a
meeting that for some reason I either wasn't !old about or was
told abovt and I blew it off with out knowing it.
IvlcD/ You weren't gelling your mail?
Kubbyl I probably just.
McD/ No we couldn't, we thought you must have been out of town.
AmbrlSix or seven times, wasn't it'!
Kubby 1 So there was no meeting, I think there's so much stuff that
the state does specifically that affects how we do business
because we say the buck stops here, literally. And that when
things come up that you either individually or as a committee
if you would help educate us as to what issues are out there, if
you have recommendations on what we should do about them,
I'd like to have that committee become more active than what
it was. as a committee. I know that we're active as individuals
and sometimes as a whole, but as that committee it would be
helpful to me to have the conuuittee bring things to my
attention that I might not find out about otherwise.
Horowl I agree with Karen. But I'm also happy that we do have the
Iowa League of Ivlunicipalities that gets on top of these things
as well as staff members. And I think that the more that, the
more issues that I'm made aware of from staff writing letters
or we, for instance when you go to the Club 39 or whatever the
name of the mayors' group. Nasty Nine, not 39.
Kubbyl Get it right, Sue,
Courtney 1 Urban ______ Coalition is the formal name.
lIorow/ Yes right. I appreciate when you let us know what's going on
in that because it docs help us become personally active.
Larsonl I think that annual meetings with our area legislators are
helpful. We've done them several times the years I've been on
council. We didn't happen to have one last year. But I think
that they are helpful. So often we arc preaching to the choir
because they understand our needs hut they are in a minority
in our legislature as a WHole. But I think annual meetings with
them at a minimum are goocl.
----,---_.~.... .~.........-".-
------- iLfl llJ'--
... -
....'.,
-
--
.
-
r~~ -,...
.
f/lk.6 page 2
Kubby/ But we do that with council as a whole but it is not a
commit tee.
I,m'son/ We did just the committee two years ago. last time we met
it was Bill and I and John. Ivlaybe it was just Bill and J. With
.lean and Minnette.
Nov/ I think we should do that because there are so many new ones.
Horow/ I think the most valuable time is when we have the
legislative day in Des Moines and you get to sit around the
table and inl1uence legislators not from tills area. That is what
I think is fun.
Larson/ I guess I see this committee as being something that if
something came up or we wanted to have a liaison on a
particular issue the committee could maybe do it rather than
the whoie council but that all council members would have
responsibility to work with legislators on issues.
Horow/ We will just have to work harder with.
Kubby/ As long as we are registered as lobbyists.
HorOlv/ I don't think we are going to have to do that anymore. The
way it sounds.
Courtney/Could I have a motion to approve these appointments.
Moved and seconded (Horow/ Ambr). Any fltrther discussion.
All in favor (ayes)
Opposed-
.__~.__~_.,__~_~.... __,__.._4''''~
_""~ J~ _"'O""""'-_III.~
,.-~_......... _..n.".... ___.. ______
-
.. ... "" p-.
"1
, 'I
,
, ,
"\"
"
-yy--~--'~
'"
..-
~-~
#9 page 1
Courtney/ City Council Information.
Kubby/ Yes, I had two issues. One is I wanted to make sure the
public had an updated or a date on which we are going to
discuss the pesticide ordinance. After I got home last nigbt ]
fell a little confused about what that date was. When everyone
was going to be- The reason the ctelays were happening were
because we couldn't get everybody here and it is something
that has been so fully discussed we wanted everyone present.
Courtney / Well it appears that if we are going to have it anytime
before spring it is going to have to be March 2, I found out we
have someone gone all of March now. E'\cept for three days.
Kubby/ Naomi, are you going to be here.
Nov/ Yeah, I am going to be here.
Larson/ Given the history of pesticide ordimmce p.h. and the amount
of things we have on March 2 I don't know who is missing the
meetings for the next three months.
Courtney / We have got Susan for a month and Bill for a month.
Larson/ It might be someone missing that we know how they feel
about it and get their ideas before hand and get the thing set
up and get it going. Because at this point we are not going to
be able to publish the thing until May and then we have
missed the spring season.
Kubby/ It is real important that we get moving.
Larson/ The only thing that I have on council time that dovetails
with this and I will get it out of the way nolV is and it was
apropos of a letter that was SOl",ewhat tongue and cheek in the
paper tonight. But something I spoke about last night which
was the appropriate way to deal with this issue is not to just
wait and see whether an initiative or referendum is put one.
We should pass an ordinance that we think is proper and then
if someone else wants to do something else as a citizen's group
that is fine. And I think council agreed with my statement to
that affect last night. But] would like to get it on the agenda.
Courtney/ I think we should put it on for an informal discussion at
the next meeting.
Atkins/ 18thl
Courtney/ Yeah.
Imson/ Well lets do it. If someone has an objection that is going to
be gone or a point to make, make it then and it is liable to be a
6/0 or 7/0 vote anyway, You never know. Get it on there. ]1'
we have to defer it, del'er it.
'i
\, ,';"
~----_..__._..._~..- -...........-..----........-- ..... -._~"--..-~-- .
----
"__-"'-'''f''' 1 .. ~ ~lIiI'MII'N,
.,..
."..
''- ~
/,
-
iil) page 2
I
i
I
I
.1
I
. I
I
i
Kubby / I am a hllle more skeptical about that in that there are only
four people who agreed to any one a~pect of any ordinance at
all and if that fourth person is not there and it is a 3/3/ vote it
dies.
larson/ Can't we get an agreement that if we have one of those kinds
of split votes that we defer it until we have a full council. We
have always done that on close votes. We have always
deferred. But maybe we can get some of the discussion out of
the way so we could just get the voting done.
Kubby / DaITCIl is looking like he is saying that he is not making any
promises.
Courtney / Exactly why I was waiting for evel}'one to be here, folks.
Kubby/ But if we miss the season. Lets just make it sure it is at a
meeting where Sue is there who has said that she is going to
vote for it as long as four are here.
MeDI I didn't here Sue say that she was going to vote for it.
Kubby I Sue was going to vote for the one aspect of the ordinance
that four of us could agree to for commercial company larger
brighter signs. That is what Sue had agreed to.
Horowl Before we do this I want' to go back and review the material.
I think we have spent an extraordinary-no, I am not hedging at
all. I just think we have spent just too much time messing
around with this. The amount of time that we have spent-
Kubby I Let's do it. Let's do this one component.
Horowl It is not that easy. Let's think about this.
l.arson/ Are we going to talk about this on the 18th. Darrell.
Courtney I Yeah. Tonight is not the time.
Atkins/19th. You don't want to have a meeting on the 18th. We
haven't agreed officially that you are going to have a meeting
on the 18th.
larsonl I don't want one. That is my vote but I thought everybody
else wanted one,
Kubby I We were keeping it tentative because of the budget.
Horowl We were going to walt until the 14th. We are making up our
mind on the 14th.
Novl Do this the 18th or 19th of January.
Atkinsl Yes.
Kubbyl My other issue is probably going to get the same response
and that is since we revisited the ban on burning I would like
us to officially let contiguous communities know that we have
kept strong on that issue as a council even though it was a split
-...,.., . - ,...----...- - A ~._---..""";
...----....-
...."._IOIII~.
I
I
,
i
.1
I
-
-
........
r ...
.
".
119 page 3
vote. To make sure that they know that we revisitec!the issue.
We c!ecic!ec!that it was in the best interest of our citizen's
public health to mailllain the ban on burning anc!that we
realize that they have partial bans or no bans anc!that some
citizens have talc! us it does affect them and to let them know
that we have-
McD! Why do you think that they are not aware of what our position
is on tllis.
Kubby! I don't necessarily thinK that they are not aware of it. I
think that they are aware through the press. What I am saying
is an official conllllunication from this council to other bodies
who are contiguous.
McD! I am not so sure that I would support that.
Kubby! One of the arguments-the reason I think about this is that
one of the arguments that Darrell made is that University
Heights doesn't have a ban on burning so the smoke comes
over so why should we have it. I want to say why wait a
minute the argument doesn't have to lead to that conclusion
and that we can have it and we can encourage other
communities to follow what we are doing.
McD! It comes dOIVn to the same tiling. One of the things we 111n into
all of the time and we will continually run illlO is that we are
trying to shove something down the smaller comlllunities
throal. Now this is something that we fight continually in a lot
of the different areas that we get involved in. I think everyone
that surrounds us and evelyone in the county knows our
position on it. A majority agreed to ban the uurning. I don't
know if it is necessary to really go any further than that.
Kubby! I think language has a iot to do with whether things are
interpreted as sho\~ng it down their throat or conllllunicating.
I think a letter can be written that is not judgmental but that is
informative.
Courtney! I got an idea, Why don't we just write a leller to the
Board of Health and have them encourage it. Ithink we have
already done thaI.
larson/ Mayor Katlchee and I just did a little radio show last
Wednesday morning about this issue and it is still percolating
in the other jurisdictions. I kind of agree with John. Although
I think the language could maybe be kind of pleasing to it. I
think it would be taken the way you have talked about it in
terms of they know IW have the ban on and I think for us to
-.......... r~- -------.---...-t .......__...~
"
,
,
~. "
,.
.'
.
--
-.
I
lit) page-J.
say listen we have stayed with the ban has to smack somewhat
of why don't you think about doing it. Their citizens should let
them knoll' that they 1I'0uld like a change. And I would
encourage their citizens to do so. But [ don't think it is our
place to tell the other elected officials what we have done and
why don't you do it also.
McD/ We voted on it twice. And I think yoa knolV that makes a
pretty solid statement.
Larsun/ As a supelvisor I don't know if I would vote. They have
totally different issues in the county, I don't think it is up to us
to analyze their questions.
Kubby/ I am thinking more of University Heights and Coralville
because what happens in thl!ir community does al'Ject our
citizens. I am saying that-the reason I brought this up is
Darrell's argument that they are not doing it why should we do
it. I am saying there are more than one way to come to a-you
can have a same situation and come up with a myriad of
conclusions.
Horow/ Except that we do have, on occasion, as telling other people
what to do and that, I have to agree with John, I really
wouldn't like that.
Kubby/ That is fine. I thought that I brought it up because I needed
to bring it up.
Courtney/Any other item.
Kubby / No I don't.
AmlJli You know over the last couple of months in these chambers
there has been a lot of talk about histOlY. Historic
preservation. Well I want to announce a historic event. I have
J1wned hanging on my family room wall an invitation to the
inauguration of William Jefferson Clinton and Albert Gore Jr. I
kept the envelope...
Courtney/ I got you beat. I got two invitations to it.
Ambr/ The only thing thaI could top this historic event is if in 1997
Min. Dodderer gets invited to Dan Quayle's inauguration.
larson/ Did you notice the news item thar Ilonald Heagan voted for
Clinton. :vJaybe that is why you got one.
Kubby/ Maybe you and I should go. A republican and a Socialist
going to a Democratic inauguration.
AmIni. It will be appropriate because is will be JanuHlY 20 which
will be a cold day.
Imson/ Why did you get one and I didn't get one,
. '.;.
______ _. ..__......_ __...___~..._....._...._____~...-.--"'-----........--"'-~ 11M'" '" Ilt~'f.lIWa '.,
,..,-.;
-~
~
, .
,
9
I
, ,
, ,
#9 page S
Courtney I [ got two o[ them.
hubby I I got one.
I.arsonl The two Hepublicilns get invitations over here....
I may demand an investigation as to how you got one, Bill.
COL:rlney / Did yours include an invitation to the inaugural ball.
Ambrl Evelyth.ing. Including medallions.
Courtney/They have a little saxophone you can order [or $35.
hubby I A little pin.
Ambr/ I am relishing that.
I.,arsonl You are one of those people that donates to both parties.
Comlneyl Did you get the solicitation from the limo service. The
limo service one. You can rent a limo for [our grand.
Horowl The other day in the Press Cilizen the E.A. had their \\1sh list
for the year and I read the wish list especially having
-
"
CHANGE TAPE TO HEEL 93-2 SIDE 2
a copy of our energy awards. Unless I am interpreting this
material we have wrongly, we are like about #1 city in the
state if not-
hubbyl I don't think that is what they mean.
Horowl It sure talks about light bulbs and all.
hubby/ I don't think they mean for the city itself. I think that they
think the city should have a program to encourage it's citizens
to conserve energy. Not the city itself.
Hormvl I would like to toot out horn in terms of what the city itself
has done, I would really like to have a report sent to them.
Kubbyl I am sure- I know some of those people-
Horow/l belong to E.1\. So it is not them it is us. I like the city to
know what we are doing because we are doing stuff.
Kubbyl We have saved over $2 million in the last ten years.
Horow/ And the other thing in terms of history. This Sunday there
will be a memorial for Darrell Court ney's birthday. That is a
historical evenl as well.
Courtneyl You beat me to it. Let it be know Ihat loday is council
woman Horow's birthday....
Ambrl I got one coming up Ihe 23rd in Glse you .....
Courtney / Anylhing else-
I had Happy Birthday Sue circled, [can cross that one oul.
_.~___~__~__._Jf!P'I!fI. ._.......1 ~_..... __ N' ___._......_. _.._~;;;
-..-
...,..-----.-----.,...,.....---
-
-
--~'..
~r
-- .
.
'-.
!Il) page 6
I am going to make a little commercial here. I attended the
committee meeting for the: United \!vay Campaign this
altemoon. The mayor always gets to he the chair of the
residential campaign and I am sure that there are a lot of folks
out there watching. And since this gets replayed for a couple
of weeks that have something that looks like this in the drawer
or in the closet. This is a pledge card. The goal of UW this year
was $lmi:lion. We anticipate at the current pledges turned in
and what has been verbally commilted but we don't actually
have it in writing yet. We are at $910,000. We have until
January 31st to raise another $90,000. And I know that there
are many of you out there who have just kind of put off
tuming the card in, oh, I'll catch it next month when I do the
bills sort of thing. There is no next month. We need these sent
in by January 31 to meet that $1 million goal. It's the most
important campaign in the city. It benefits numerous agencies.
Lots of comments being made about the national organization.
That's past history. It's been taken care of. 92Q: of every dollar
stays in Johnson collnty. I highly encourage you to get the
cards out, fill them out. Double what you think you ollght to
give and send it in.
Lemon/ Well said,
Horow/ You do a good job.
Courtney/ Salesman from way back. Besides, John BahlJl~r said I had
to do it. I always do everything John says. Secondly, there will
he a special formal meeting for January 12 at 5:30 just prior to
our budget deliberations to consider the sewer bond sale that
scheduled to take place on that day, Thirdly, I would just
encourage at least 248 people to send letters to the Press-
Citizen in opposition of dropping IX)onesbury.
Horow/ Oh, I agree.
Courtney/ I think il would be a travesty, One of Ihe totally adult
oriented comics in there. And jllst because another flawed
survey took place, that 247 said it was one they did not like, I
want 248 people to send it in.
Kubby/ All right, Darrell.
Horow/ I will.
Courtney/ Secondly, 228 people ougHt to protest dropping Non
Sequitur. This is a local author, moved 10 Iowa City, and
deserves to have his comic in the paper. So 248 and 228,
\"
~___._._.,......._._......_.~~ .._...........___..-..___..._____-'!!IT
pJlft', _
..... ~ "" ,.",....,..-- "U
i
I
, '
. .'}
j...
-~
-
~.
-
r
-
.
.. - '" .......
~-
'I
,
, '
-.
119 page 7
I..arson/ You know, my cOl!!ment about that is sometimes newspapers
have to lead rather than just cater to the whims of the public
and I get Doonesbul)' ilJ 3 or 4 different newspapers daily so I
don't really care but I wouldn't like that. That just feels wrong
to have Iowa City, the //lost literate community in the countl)'
to think about dropping Doonesbury.
Courtney / I //lay have to start getting a different paper if
Doonesbury is dropped. It doesn't show up inlhe Wall Street
Journal and the Investor's Business Daily. I don't get the Des
I\Joines Hegisler. I get the local paper. Okay. Enough said on
that.
I
i
,
,
I
,
i
I
,
I
I
I
i
,
i
i
I
I
I
I
J
I
i
,
I
-
_ ...,-
-""1ma
-
- --alMa., ~
, "1
I
, ,
-.
#lOa page 1
'1.
Courtney/ City ManagEr.
Atkins/ .Just one follow up to your comments about the UW. I think
you all recall that in the six years that I have been here the
city employees again exceeded their goal. We believe we
certainly have made our contribution. That is all] have.
Courtney/Yes. We got a glowing report on that this afternoon.
":1 l';,
i
,<,I ,;
"II
i
,.__...__'"'~ .." U'--~-"--'" -"IIl11lli11ii
--~ !If '>..d. _'H")!lA ~
-----.....---~--
~-
Action:
Agenda
Iowa City City Council
January 5, 1993
Page 10
ITEM NO. 11 _ Consider a motion to approve a tentative agreement between the City of Iowa
City and Iowa City Association of Professional Firefighters, IAFF, Local 610.
Comment: This tentative agreement is for a duration of one year and Includes a
4% across.the-board wage increase, a $20 per month co.payment for health
insurance by those employees electing for family coverage, a $150 annual
payment in lieu of employees receiving additional holiday accrual ior holidays
actually worked, Incorporation of the current shift schedule into the agreement,
and some minor contract language modifications. A copy of the tentative
agreement Is Included in Council's agenda packet.
Action: /Jmth ) #no
lev ~) If>>A 0/; Y.LL
. ( 10
ITEM NO. 12. CONSIDER A RESOLUTION REJECTING THE BID FOR A CONTRACT FOR THE ~
REMODELING OF THE CIVIC CENTER MAIN LOB8Y PROJECT.
Comment: The bid opening for this project was held December 15, 1992. The
following bid was received:
McComas-Lacina Construction
B~se Bid: $63,378.00
Alternate #1: $ 1.950,00
Alternate #2: $560.00
Architect's Estimate: $47,000.00
Public Works/Engineering recommends rejection of this bid.
Action: ~AMuJ / du~ d~/ -!J 1)1
I '
1f(J~ ~.J 11// arfA')
ITEM NO. 13. CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 15 ENTITLED 'SOLID WASTE'
q~. 355'1 OFTHE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF IOWA CITY, IOWA TO CREATE
A NEW SECTION 15-43 TITLED 'LIEN'. (SECOND CONSIDERATION)
Comment: This new section 15-43 was inadvertently omitted from the May 1992
revision establishing curbside separation of solid waste, This section allows the
City to attach a lien upon the property of any user or property owner who has
failed to pay for solid waste service. Such liens shall attach to the property
receiving solid waste service only upon certification by the City Council and filing
of the lien with the County. Staff recommends adoption of this ordinance.
ITEM NO. 14. A~~Oj~~ J I~
~
..,.
-
"</'
-..
1111 Page 1
Courtney/ !\'Ioved by Ambr, seconded by HorolV. Discussion.
Kubby / I am going to be voting no on this and it is not that I have
problems with a lot of different parts of this. It is just one part
of it but it is such an important part to me that I feel like I
have to vote no. And that is the co-payment for family
coverage. I just think it is not a family friendly thing and that
IVe should pay full coverage for families.
Courtney / I wished you would call Minneapolis and tell my employer
that. I checked today and mine is a $145 co-payment.
Kubby / Just because the private sector does it doesn't Illean it is
light.
Courtney! I \\1sh you would encourage them.
Kubby / I sure will.
Courtney/Any other discussion-
All those in favor
Motion passes, Kubby voting no.
_.__.~...",..~_'_._ _ ~ _ll!r!I!f"d"",-,"".
---.~..._.._- -'
---..-....
11 mlilllW--
I
I
, ,
I
:
j
I
t
\
I
I
i
,',' "
I,
-
-
r .....
.
.....
,
,
, ,
if] 2 page]
Courtney/ The city manager has requested that \\'e defer lhis item.
Atkins! I prefer that you defer it. We spoke this afternoon and we
may be able to spend some lime with the perspective bidder
and bring it closer to the estimate. We would like two weeks to
take a run at it.
Courtney / Moved and second it (l.arson/ Horow) to defer to the
-'anualY 19 meeting. Is that long enough.
Atkins/ That is fine.
Larson/ I may vote against it then because I am not a big fan of
single bidder bids.
Horow/ this is my question then. Docs that mean that you go back
out as a-
Atkins/ No. Deferral gives us a chance to talk to the perspective
person there. The perspective company that we might be
awarding this too. Rejection is rejection. It is done. You have
to go back through the process.
Larson/ I am willing to let you negotiate very toughly in case there
is communication elTor about what we were looking for or
something like that but I ma not saying I am going to vote for
it even if they come down a bit.
Nov/ Does this deferral allow someone else to come in with a bid.
Atkins/ No it does not.
Horow/ That was my question. I don't understand why not.
Courtney/We closed the bids.
Horow/ When you alter the specifications to decrease the pIice you
therefore change the bid.
Atkins/ No, There may be some- Marsh will have to help me. We
don't materially alter the project. That is why we need to talk
to the perspective bidder. We are permitted to do that through
a process of negotiation. If it becomes a substantial enough
change we look to legal to guide us in this. Then in fact it is a
matter of rejection. I am doing this at the request of a staff
member saying maybe we can go through that process and
bring something even closer.
Larson/ I think a lot of us feel the same way about single bids in that
we have no way of knowing whether we are getting a
competitive type situation unless we have two or three people
bidding and this is not an urgent thing. It id the right time to
do it along with the remodeling. To rebid wouldn't be any big
deal to me.
Courtney/ Any other discussion on deferring. All in favor (ayes).
~J;
,'.,
-
~-
r --
..~"'T
I,.~, <.'''. ")"-:';:'\'; '.' . . ":--;'-";..' " >,' -r7':,.; ,::,.:8 ,J,' .'. . , 'j'
:~ :: ,"' ",' ',;, ,;:'::~ ~;s:~:: ..:, :";_:':'" ,'" :~:;:;', :":,,:"i/';':,:, ::::);t ,,?;!;';'
~/;;I ,::7>:J;:>,',',: =<'':t' ::: -,':>/"\' ;~::. ,~>~~ \"~\'/:~'\:." ,:,.l"f:,
\" .' ,',' I, , I, " . ,"""'I''''',.r " " 'iJ."",,,,,,,,, ",,'., " ,
~;. ., J_~,.\.r \,~" ",--: '1,-' ,2' -,' -, ".~, ,.':~';':r',' ~,-,::".,'..;,';".':':' ,....,-,..
'-:
,
,
City of Iowa City
MEMORANDUM
DATE: December 31, 1992
TO: City Council
FROM: City Manager
RE: Work Session Agendas and Meeting Schedule
Monday
January 4 , 1993
6:30 P.M. . Special Council Meeting. Executive Session
(Collective Bargaining)
City Council Work Session. Council Chambers
Housing Code Amendments
- Review zoning matters
_ Council agenda, Council time, Council committee reports
_ Consider an appointment to the 80ard of Examiners of
Plumbers
6:50 . 8:00 P.M.
6:50 P.M.
7:00 P.M.
7:45 P.M.
7:55 P.M.
~anuary 5, 1993 Tuesday
7:30 P.M. - Regular Council Meeting - Council Chambers
January 12, 1993
5:30 - 9:30 P.M.
Tuesday
City Council Work Session - Council Chambers
Discuss FY94 Budget
January 14, 1993
5:30 . 9:30 P.M.
Thursday
City Council Work Session - Council Chambers
Discuss FY94 Budget
January 18, 1993
6:30 - 8:30 P.M.
Monday
City Council Work Session - Council Chambers
Agenda Pending
January 19, 1993 Tuesday
7:30 P.M. - Regular Council Meeting - Council Chambers
PENDING LIST
Appointments to the Committee on Community Needs, Broadband Telecommunications
Commission and Human Rights Commission - January 19, 1993
Appointments to the Historic Preservation Commission and Mayor's Youth
Employment 80ard - ~.~~ 1993
F~b(()a.ry 013)
_......~_.................,________.._...._ .........--........... JII 1 ~~ilI=' ---