Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1993-04-26 Council minutes -~.,..,........ 1. \ ".. -...- ...-.-- .. .. ~..~-- .....-r-.-' ... - - '-r- .-y ,.~ -.. ...........- ... ~ :";" .': t7,.::,: :,:;m.' ", :iZI::': ''It:4! ,': ;,.'~ ,c,:"'::,....:.,"'::: ,\:' :,::\.:.:.,'~,~.\,,':,\~:" ,'.~<Jl>>.~~~:~7'1"" :...~: ..:~".\:':'".".'. ; ',:,: ~ I COMPLETE DESCRIPTION OF COUNCIL ACTIVITIES APRIL 26, 1993 Iowa City City Council, special mlg., 6:40 p.m. In the Council Chambers. Councllmembers present: Ambrlsco, Courtney, Horowitz, Kubby, Novick. Absent: McDonald. Staffmembers present: Atkins, Heillng, Gentry, Karr. Council minutes tape recorded on Tape 93-41, Side 1, 1- End. Moved by Ambrlsco, seconded by Horowitz, to adjourn to executive session to discuss strategy wllh counsel In matters that are presently In litigation or where litigation Is Imminent where Its disclosure would be likely to prejudice or disadvantage the position of the governmental body In that litigation; and to discuss as a public employer, strategy regarding collective bargaining with city employee organizations; as such discussion is exempted from the provisions of Chapter 21 according to Chapter 20.17(3). Affirmative roll call vote unanimous, 5/0, McDonald absent. The Mayor declared the motion carried and adjourned to executive session, 6:41 p.m. Council returned to formal session, 6:53 p.m. Moved by Novick, seconded by Ambrlsco, to adjourn to Council work session, 6:55 p.m. The Mayor declared the motion carried unanimously, 5/0 McDonald absent. /~ Darrel G. Courtney, Ma r I I i , : -, ~J:"-u).I( ~A.J Ma n K. Karr, City Clerk .~' clerk\4.26cc,mln "--/' -IP').' V",... \ ".. .......- ...-.- .. r~....-rJ--"""-r ~!:' . ~~;,' ',Iijio :';:,"-'.. "R' ", ,~,.' . ,.: . "'I.. " 'tIfl' .~" ~' ., . ", .'. '. - ~ ", .. ',.,' ,- ',; . " ::',:" ...".,.., .. . ..,', " :~;i','~' '::,':\':~;;~'.":":"II"""",, "~';":':" "I,,": '<:':,"'.\ , \ City of Iowa City MEMORANDUM Date: May 6, 1993 Revised 5/7/93 To: Mayor and City Council From: City Clerk Re: Council Work Session-CIP, April 20, 1993 - 5:45 p.m. in the Council Chambers Mayor Darrel Courtney presiding. Council members: Courtney, McDonald, Kubby, Horowitz, Novick, Ambrlsco. Staff present: Atkins, Helling, Karr, Franklin, Yucuis, Schmadeke, Fosse, Davidson, Trueblood, Schoon, Klingaman, Tape recorded on Tapes 93-35, Side 2; 93-39, All; 93-40, All. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS DISCUSSION: Reel 93-35, Side 2 City Manager Atkins stated that he hoped that staff and Council would review his April 14, 1993 memorandum regarding Capital Improvement program, hold a detailed discussion about the finances and resources available, discuss the projects as listed, and go through an actual process of setting priorities. Atkins stated the CIP process Inciudes two elements: the technical/financial aspect and political aspect. Atkins noted that his April 14, 1993 memorandum regarding Capital Improvement pr09ram includes a summary, "Financial Resources Capital Improvement Program 1993-2000" and information about the major sources of money that would be available to finance the projects. Atkins stated that Public Works Director Chuck Schmadeke, PCD Director Karin Franklin, City En9ineer Rick Fosse, and Transportation Planner Jeff Davidson are present to present Information regarding the CIP. Atkins said that projects are broken into categories and that it is Important In those categories to have similar values applied to similar projects. Atkins stated there is also a criteria for review Included in the memorandum. FINANCES. Atkins stated that the CIP list includes $225 million in requests. Atkins stated that the financial options available are subject to statutory and charter regulations. Atkins stated that the time frame established for the CIP process Is a seven year period of time, 1993.2000. Atkins stated staff made a general assumption that the financial policies outlined in the memorandum are acceptable to Council and If that Is the case, there Is approximately $112,000 available resources that could be utilized right now. Atkins stated the unknowns in flnancin9 the CIP are what Is 90in9 to survive Council policy scrutiny, the ability to carry these projects from Council to Council, and financing Implications for the future. Atkins reviewed the list of financial resources as foliows. General Fund. Atkins stated that a general assumption is that little general funds monies will be put toward capital projects. Atkins cautioned Council about using general fund money for major capital projects. Atkins stated that as a matter of policy, general fund Is intended to support the City's operatln9 program and services and that the general fund should be used for capital projects only when It is absolutely necessary. I-13 \ ...---- - .-- r~,.- ....., ~- .....". ~ _ - ....-r-- __~ ,-_ .. ......,..- ... .......,. -- -...- .- ';: ~".' ". i;',:;:.\.:/:!(' ,.: i'T/'.....<.I~Jl. ..; , ,'<:; : >>' ..:, :,:' <~,::.:: '. \" [,f.: '. '131-,~ ,r., ,lf~J,. ,. "J . ~ , . ':', l' '. ~.,""'i; "~,' '~1 ""~',~" \' ',1'';-'': \',' '.,' , . '.~ \' ",.' ;:.\ :"'. 2 GENERAL OBLIGATION DEBT. Atkins stated that $12.5 million of general obligation debt is projected to be available over the next seven year period. Atkins stated that It is assumed that property values will grow at a rate of three percent a year and the tax rate that ;s used for debt service would remain constant over the seven year period. Atkins stated that if that rate remains constant the proportion of taxes that are assigned for debt will diminish over the seven year period. Atkins noted that there Is a 25% policy that says no more than 25% of tax revenues will be used for debt service. In response to Horowitz, Atkins stated that many projects would require a referendum. Council members discussed the City's AAA bond rating. Atkins stated the bond rating Is important. Courtney noted that differences in Interest rates in today's market between AA and AAA bonds are very, very small. Atkins stated the issue of landfill fees, parking fees, water and wastewater fees make the assumption that the projects that are clearly identified as being appropriate are to be funded by these fees. Atkins explained that fees are charged commensurate with the capital that is to be secured In the form of debt service on those fees. Kubby raised concerns about the 140% Increase in water rates as It applies to liveability on a monthly basis. Kubby stated other options should be discussed. Atkins stated the City has not formally adopted a stormwater fee policy; currently stormwater management is paid for by general revenues and general obligation debt; and it is believed that stormwater management and Its cost to the community is going to grow substantially because of federal regulations. Atkins stated that he Is making the assumption that Council will address an ordinance and/or policy that adopt some type of stormwater management fee to generate monies to pay for these projects. Atkins stated that under current law, a storm water utility district could be established utilizing some sort of formula by which the City can charge people for storm water management. Atkins explained that the City will need to consider a stormwater management fee to finance storm water management projects required by federal and state regulations. City Engineer Fosse explained that an inventory will be needed and would consist of an aerial mapping of the City to Identify watersheds and existing storm sewers. Horowitz asked if the storm water management inventory process could utilize the City/County mapping project. Fosse stated that that aerial photography was flown at three different elevations over the city and the 50-scale and/or 1 DO-scale maps will be useable provided there haven't been significant changes in those areas. Atkins noted that Fosse has been In contact with the city of Coralville regarding participation in this project. Novick Inquired about the billing for a stormwater management fee. Atkins stated that a form of a utility billing would be considered. ~ PARKLAND ACQUISITION FUND. FEDERAL/STATE GRANTS. Atkins stated that this Is very milch an unknown and very much a question of timing. Atkins noted that the policy remains that the City make the most of whatever state and federal aids are available. In response to Horowitz, Davidson stated that there is fiexibillty with the use of ISTEA money. Horowitz asked when is the Iowa-illinois Gas & Electric Company franchise up for renewal. Atkins stated that franchise agreement was adopted in 1986 and is up for renewal in the year 2001. SUMMARY OF CAPITAL PROJECTS: WATER, Atkins explained that surface water !Iowa River) Is likely to be the City's source of water in the future. Atkins explained that two specific areas in the rules and regulations that are of concern are the turbidity and the chlorine. Atkins stated that the City of Iowa City will be scrutinized very closely by the DNR and EPA because Iowa City is one of the largest ~ :r ~ /3 ~ ~'F V ~ ~................. .".-' ---- - .. ~.~- .....~ ,-- - - "---- ~-- -- .. .. r - .~ ..-"''T-'''- .....,...-- ~.!.b" 'C":~:::.j;d:, ',:,(":':; ,';;.',:. '," '~ :" "::::,:> :'" ,: <'::,:' 'c, r;p'f, .:.TI"-.L-~-r.). -~,,,' r.....- --,., -~-:..--~>--'-'--- ~I "~"~;I;:I"":'~" '~,~. \~"i '~\'.. . ".,:.'''.\' ,".,':'},'...:, 3 surface water users in Iowa. Atkins explained that turbidity is a matter of clarity and the City cannot consistently meet the new limits. Atkins also noted that the City Is concerned about its ability to meet the new chlorine regulations, Atkins explained because the City will be unable to consistently meet the new limits, the City will have to put out notice to the public. Atkins stated other issues associated with the water project are the continued use of surface water, the extent of the use of well water, the location of the well system inside or outside the City, plant location, and the need to put out a public concern notification. Atkins noted the City is entertaining discussions with the University of Iowa about the possible purchase of water to do some blending. Atkins stated the water project is estimated to cost $44 million. Atkins noted that policy Is to pay for this project through the use of user fees which means water revenue bonds. In response to Kubby, Pl'bllc Works Director Schmadeke explained the University of Iowa uses river water and a Jordan well. Schmadeke stated the University has a reserve capacity far greater than the City's. Novick asked how compliance with new regulations is monitored. Schmadeke stated the City checks itself and provides a notification if it Is in violation. Courtney asked how many gallons the City pumps currently. Schmadeke stated that the City pumps an average of 7 to 7 Y, million gallons per day and 10 to 10 Y, million gallons per day in the summer. Kubby inquired about the decrease In capacity with the new regulations. Schmadeke explained that the new regulations for chlorine contact time will determine water plant capacity. Schmadeke stated that is why the City wants to purchase two million gallons from the University. In response to Kubby, Schmadeke explained that the City has been trying to operate under the new standards and Improve turbidity. Schmadeke noted there will be periods where the City Is going to be in violation, Schmadeke noted that if the City can purchase two million a day from the University, the City could Improve water quality to the point that the City could meet the regulations. Kubby raised concerns about the lack of water conservation and education program. Novick stated that the City should go beyond education and offer water saving shower heads, aerators, etc. at cost or less. Kubby asked if the City has met with the University yet about obtaining the two million gallons per day. Schmadeke stated yes. Atkins explained that if the City plans to move the treatment plant north of 1-80 the City will need to build a sewer line from the treatment plant down to the existing sanitary sewer because of the water's sludge. Atkins noted that once a sewer line is built there Is a potential for growth and development In that area. Ambrlsco inquired about the timeframe for the water project. Atkins stated that the City will have to initiate a program within a year. Schmadeke stated staff Is looking at beginning construction of the water project at the end of 1994 and finishing the project by the end of 1996. Horowitz asked who owns the property at the City's current water plant, Schmadeke stated the City owns the property, Atkins stated that there is a lot of Interest by the University regarding that property. McDonald asked Schmadeke if the City Is going to use surface water to meet its future water needs. Schmadeke stated the City Is going to have to use a substantial amount of surface water. Schmadeke stated there is not a good groundwater supply in the county. Horowitz asked if the Coralville Reservoir Is being considered. Schmadeke stated that staff is looking at the Coralville Reservoir as a water source. Schmadeke explained that the City is looking at three water sources: the river, the Jordan aquifer and the silurian aquifer, AIRPORT. Atkins explained the airport and its master plan Is stili under review. Atkins stated that he is unsure of what the cost will be for the project. Atkins stated that staff Is using the assumption that no decision has been made on the options. Atkins explained that costs associated with the airport project will be split 90% federal/1 0% local. Atkins stated that if Council chooses to use debt to finance the City's share of the airport project, money will have to be reserved from the $12.5 million total. Atkins explelned that If the airport Is moved to 1:-13 -v-' - .. ~...--~, ......,~- .~,......... - r_-r- __,.~ ... .... /~.~:',"t:;j" :.!~""': ",t~/';' '.~l." ',..',:,:' .::,'.':>'. . . I' _' . '., 'i~ ",' '. J I': . )' . ' \ '" 1 :l)..:,~.\ """i~ :, :1"'___.;.1" -'. :.~~' . iU; : .. ," <, . <: ': ,~:' ' ,:', . ':" ,'. ;', . . ." ". ~ " I \" ,\ ' I , :-.. . 4 a new site, it would require a referendum for borrowing. Atkins noted that if the airport Is moved to a new site, a major sewer line will be needed at the current airport property site. LANDFILL. Atkins stated City staff considers this project a mandate. Atkins stated that the assumption is being made that the tipping fees will be used to continue to finance the landfill. Horowitz asked If there is a way to get together with Cedar Rapids on financing a transfer station to connect with their compostible facility. Atkins stated yes. Atkins explained a transfer station would depend upon who was going to carry the burden on capital financing for the composting process. Kubby asked Schmadeke for information regarding communities using a tipping fee based on volume instead of weight. Schmadeke stated some cities have a volume limit and pay for each garbage can for an additional fee. Kubby Inquired about volume-based tipping fees. Atkins noted that landfills are space. Schmadeke noted that currently the City charges by ton and the City is taxed on a per-ton basis by the state as well. Kubby stated It is her ideal to have cost per space charged. \ WASTEWATER. Schmadeke explained that there is ammonia and the City has to get rid of it. Schmadeke explained the City can treat ammonia either mechanically or with chlorine. Schmadeke said that the chlorine treatment process is dangerous for employees and storage is a problem. Novick Inquired about removing ammonia in wetiands. Schmadeke stated that using wetlands to remove ammonia is not recommended because it Is not economical and there are questions about reliability because of climatic changes. Kubby noted that she will try to obtain additional Information regarding the use of wetlands to remove ammonia. Schmadeke stated that a mechanical process will treat BOD and suspendible solids as well as treat ammonia. Horowitz asked if wetlands and a mechanical process could both be used. Schmadeke explained that if you build a connecting sewer and used the wetiands, the sewer between the two plants would only transport finished water from the north plant, which would not have the ammonia removed. You would stili have to use all the treatment processes at the north plant for BOD and suspended solids. Schmadeke recommended money be used to build a treatment process and to begin phasing out the north plant. Courtney inquired about the north plant. Schmadeke stated that the old section could be phased out and the new section used for stormwater flows that get Into the sanitary sewer system. Kubby asked for an explanation about the relationship between Increased capacity and ammonia treatment. Schmadeke explained that the process to remove ammonia is the same process used to remove BOD and suspended solids and the City would have to double the capacity of its existing system to remove ammonia. In response to Novick, Schmadeke stated currently there are no plans to add employees. Schmadeke stated the staff Is also recommending connecting the two plants together at the time it treats ammonia and to begin to phase out the use of the north plant. Schmadeke explained the location of the north plant is not ideal because of restricted space and odor problems. Schmadeke presented Information about the chlorine treatment process. Schmadeke noted that initially the City would load up the south plant to Its maximum capacity so It could store the greatest amount of chlorine at that plant. In response to Horowitz, Schmadeke stated that If state law holds the City has ten year reprieve and has until November 1999 to have the facilities built, If EPA overrides the state, the City would have three years to complete the project. Courtney asked if the connection was made between the north and south plants does the City have to add capacity to the south Immediately, Schmadeke stated that is right. Schmadeke explained that the City can relieve the north plant by just making the connection given that it treats ammonia with chlorine. ]:,/3 \ ."...----------.--.- ... --- IA .1' I ..' \ , " . ", 'tEl- '~-' t-'" - I . .\ " ' . . " " :21" ' .' , ,', ,', "." '." , F:: :::" ,.""f~,',:'::~:' .~~./-,:.":"z.L' ::< . .'...' , " ': ,:<. ,.: ,". ;:.J 5 Kubby inquired about water and wastewater treatment rates. Atkins stated the City is now approaching a high average compared to other cities in Iowa. Atkins explained stafflooked at water, sewer and current refuse rates. An average monthly bill was $35. Atkins explained that the projects proposed would cause a $35 average bill to increase to $57. SOUTHWEST INTERCEPTOR. Schmadeke explained project costs for the southwest interceptor is approximately $7.5 million. Schmadeke presented a map detailing the location of the southwest interceptor sewer. In response to Council members, Schmadeke explained that at some point In time a southwest interceptor sewer will be needed for the west side drainage area to completely develop. Schmadeke presented information about the southwest Interceptor sewer as it relates to the Walnui Ridge Subdivision. Hawkeye Lift Station. and Camp Cardinal Road. PENINSULA SEWER AND LIFT STATION. Schmadeke explained that the gravity sewer and lift station Is proposed to be tied into the sewer at Taft Speedway, Schmadeke stated that this project is needed to provide for development of the peninsula area and will be needed if the City builds a water treatment plant adjacent to the river north of 1-80. Schmadeke referred Council members to a map. Councllmembers discussed the locations for a new water plant. Novick asked if the City would have to have ownership or easement rights in terms of getting water from the river to the water plant. Schmadeke stated that the City would need easement rights. NORTH RIVER CORRIDOR SEWER. Schmadeke noted the project costs are estimated $425,000. Franklin presented information about the peninsula area. Franklin noted that two road projects. Foster Road and Taft reconstruction, spin off of the sewer extension. Franklin noted that property owners on the peninsula, Including the Elks Club. are interested in deveiopment in the area. Kubby asked why a separate sewer line Is needed for the peninsula and Idyllwlld area. Schmadeke stated there are basically two different drainage areas. Horowitz asked If both the north river corridor sewer and Highlander area sewer would be needed for the water plant. Schmadeke noted that if the river location isn't the first choice then the peninsula sewer would not have to be built. Novick asked how far north Is being considered for the water treatment plant. Schmadeke stated that a plant needs to be located in an area along the river where, under normal low flow the water depth in the river is sufficient that the City can draw a continuous flow into the plant. Schmadeke stated the consultants are to come back to the City with two locations along the river between 1.80 and the reservoir that would be Ideal sites to draw water from the river. Franklin noted that placement of the plant will have an impact on development In the area. Franklin noted that when Schmadeke answered Horowitz's questions regarding substituting the north corridor for the peninsula, that that was in relationship to its serving the water treatment plant. Franklin stated the peninsula sewer can serve two functions; one is for growth on the peninsula and one Is access to the water treatment plant If the water treatment plant is west. Franklin stated that if the water treatment plant were not built there, Council could make the decision not to extend the peninsula trunk if Council did not want to encourage development on the peninsula. NORTHWEST TRUNK SEWER. Schmadeke explained this is extension to serve the north half of Walnut Ridge Subdivision. In response to Kubby, Schmadeke stated that the northwest trunk sewer was not installed at the time the pipe was extended to the edge of the property because, at that time. staff did not feel Walnut Ridge was going to develop as fast as it has, 1:'13 \ .. .. ...----..-~--....". ,...... - - -..~............... '~':;, 'oif',":t""c''-'7 .1~"., I ,',:, '" ':,.',;'.., ,':.', ." , t, _ ""ill" ...,l"',;,..,,, ,,", ',"',' ,,' 1 :,':,'f' ,: ;', ..}2'J;, '[. ',- > '/:' ".:,,', :".~ :f.""'.~;"':\~' I'\~' ;,,,'1....,' ",., ,J., Eo' , , ' '.' , 6 ABER AVENUE SEWER. Schmadeke explained this is the sewer line thet lies south of Rohret Roed extending from the existing southwest trunk west across Mormon Trek and Highway 218 to serve the area immediately south of the new school site along the south side of Rohret Road. Franklin stated this would allow development In a drainage area that Is within the growth policies but currently outside the corporate limits. Schmadeke stated It is in the southwest water shed area and includes 600 undeveloped acres, HIGHLANDER AREA SEWER AND LIFT STATION. Schmadeke stated this project assumes development along Scott Boulevard north of the ridge line where the east-west arterial would be located. Council members and staff referred to a map. In response to Kubby, Schmadeke noted that the river corridor sewer that was built in 1980 has the capacity to serve the undeveloped areas within the City plus 750 acres north of the Interstate. Novick asked If the City has ever contracted to sell water or sewer to areas outside the corporate limits. Schmadeke stated no. it is the City's current policy to not provide service outside the City limits. IDYLLWILD AREA SEWER PROJECT, Schmadeke referred to an area map. SCOTT PARK AREA TRUNK SEWER. Schmadeke referred to an area map. Schmadeke stated this serves a drainage area including 300 acres east of Scott Boulevard north of Court Street. Horowitz asked how much the developer would pay and how much the City's share would be in terms of the Glasgow property. Schmadeke stated that the project does not Include Bruce Glasgow's property. Schmadeke noted the care center would also tie Into the sewer. WEST SIDE TRUNK SEWER PROJECT. Schmadeke explained this Is a ten Inch sewer line that currently extends west of Mormon Trek and serves the property north of Rohret Road. In response to Horowitz, Schmadeke stated It would be going to the school and the Kennedy property. Kubby asked if Council decided not to do the west side trunk sewer project where would the school sewage go. Schmadeke stated the school waste would stili go down through the same sewer. Franklin noted that there are two final plats that are pending Council's decision on the west side trunk. Franklin noted that with the west side sewers and development In the area there will be a need for the southwest interceptor. Horowitz asked if there was a logical sequence of stall's point of view. Schmadeke stated that if you wanted to accommodate development that will occur because of the school then the west side should be done. Council members and staff discussed development sequence. Franklin stated that as Council moves into deciding priorities a sequencing of the projects will fall Into place. Franklin explained that the phasing In growth and development In terms of the list of CIP projects the City will do In the next seven years will also fall Into place. Franklin stated that In a certain sense by prioritizing the CIP Council Is setting up for a new Comp plan. STREET RECONSTRUCTION: Council member Kubby requested that a map be available. Atkins stated that a map locating the street projects can be placed In the Public Works Conference Room, Atkins noted there are four categories of streets: new. existing improved, unimproved and bridges. STREET RECONSTRUCTION (EXISTING IMPROVED). NORTH DUBUQUE STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT. Fosse explained that North Dubuque Street is experiencing flooding and when the Iowa River is high It reduces the capacity of the City's storm sewers In the area. T~IJ -- ~, V" ... "... -- - ....,.-.--- ---.........." --.".- -r ,..-...... - - '-r '~J~,'.;,pr.:; ";i~::' :-:J71;;'~\!PI,.':':,',:.,;.. :'.:', ':':. './:,':',:' ~'. ",;~........{,';-:l"\~~,; . ,fL., ....;.0, ...' '. " ,',; ~ \ , . 1,_, . " -. . "1' .,' , , . ", 7 BENTON STREET-GREENWOOD DRIVE TO ORCHARD. Davidson explained that staff identified areas of concerns Including capacity constraint. Kubby noted that the summary on the Benton Street project does not state what the improvements would be. SYCAMORE STREET-HIGHWAY 6 TO DEFOREST. Fosse stated that this Is a capacity related item. Kubby asked why this project does not go down to Lower Muscatine. Davidson stated that staff would probably look down to Lower Muscatlne. Novick inquired about parking on the street. Fosse stated that parking is allowed north of DeForest. Davidson stated that any time you do something for capacity it helps, DODGE STREET-GOVERNOR TO NORTH DUBUQUE ROAD. Fosse explained this is very much a capacity related issue and there is pressure from the DOT. Fosse noted that the intersection of Prairie du Chien and Dodge Street is now causing problems and it would be difficult to signalize it without widening it. Horowitz stated that Horace Mann Elementary School has raised concerns regarding traffic and speed. Horowitz asked If It Is possible to diminish traffic coming down through Dodge Street via the east-west arterial and Scott Boulevard extension. Davidson reminded Council that in Iowa City, people are coming downtown or to the University Hospital and even if you get around the north end of town, at some point people are going to want to get to town. Davidson emphasized that most trips in Iowa City are still made from out-to-in in the morning and from In-to-out in the evening. HIGHWAY 6-LAKESIDE DRIVE TO SCOTT BOULEVARD, Fosse explained that this is an extension of the existing divided four-lane concept of Highway 6 Bypass. Fosse stated its benefits would be providing turning lanes into the City's industrial park and on to Scott Boulevard and possibly to developments to the south. Fosse stated there Is potential for state participation on these improvements. Courtney asked If right-of-way is available. Fosse stated preliminary drawings show that the City will need a little additional right-of-way. Horowitz asked how many of the street projects could possibly involve federal funds. Davidson stated almost all of them. Horowitz asked how many of them would also need environmental assessment or environmental impacts. Davidson stated that is something to be evaluated on a project-by-project basis. \ FIRST A VENUE-D STREET TO BRADFORD. Davidson stated this Is on the arterial street plan and is tied to the Council's ultimate decision regarding extending First Avenue. MUSCATINE AVENUE.BURLlNGTON TO COURT. Fosse stated that plans are to maintain a three-lane' facility but getting adequate lane width is problematic. MELROSE AVENUE-BYINGTON TO HAWKINS. Fosse stated that this item has been discussed previously. GILBERT STREET-HIGHWAY 6 DUAL LEFT TURN LANES. Fosse emphasized this is a very badly needed project, Fosse noted there are right-of-way constraints on the north side. Fosse explained thet a great opportunity to construct this project would be during the connector sewer project between the two plants, BURLINGTON AND GILBERT STREET INTERSECTION, Fosse explained that USTEP funds are available. Fosse explained this project will add a left turn lane to the three legs of the intersection that does not currently have it, Fosse stated another component of the project is the Ralston Creek bridge on Burlington Street. Courtney raised concerns about the condition of Burlington Street. Fosse stated that the DOT has told the City if they wait a year the state will help pay for the Burlington Street bridge over Ralston Creek. McDonald inquired 7 .__.........._-~.~ .-..._. ~~~.-'~-.. --....1 -~-u.IRlI11"..~ .._~4.4HJII.,j,~ :c.-13 --~'V"" ".... -- - ......-.- -----. ..~...- ......~- <--'::'t"l--'-'-';-~""':" 't'"',..' .'tj' ,. ,',.,', ,: ',,' ,':,' ',: .... ~;'~" '~- /':~" 'f. ",:,:' :" :':;.....~I' i"c,': ", ':. ; "r,",,:,::,::',',,";,.- \ \ r,. ~ '( ." ,,1 .' ~ i" > I, , :" :-,~;,:..': .~,'d.-' ,~',,~ ,'\:' "" " .:'~',:\.':,. ~- ..' 8 about past work done on the Burlington Street bridge over Ralston Creek. Fosse said previously the City applied an epoxy chip seal on It to try to slow down the rate of chlorides gelling into the deck steel. Fosse stated there are two problems: the deck is corroding and the chip seal Isn't sticking. RIVER STREET-RIVERSIDE TO WOOLF. Fosse stateq the existing pavement is deteriorating. WOOLF AVENUE-NEWTON TO RIVER. Horowitz asked If the dangerous corner at the Woolf and River streets Intersection could be eliminated. Staff referred to a map. TRAFFIC SIGNALlZA TION/ASPHAL T RESURFACING. Fosse explained this money Is used for periodic traffic signal improvement and overlay on streets. STREET RECONSTRUCTION (FORMERLY UNIMPROVED). MELROSE AVENUE-WEST HIGH TO HIGHWAY 218. Fosse stated this project connects the two divided four-lane segments with similar type arrangement. Courtney noted that Council recently received a petition for this project. Fosse stated the project also adds sidewalks to the area. Horowitz raised concerns about the statement that the construction of the Camp Cardinal Road from Melrose to Highway 6 would significantly impact this portion of Melrose Avenue. Davidson stated that this project does not relate to a capacity problem but that it is a safety-related one without sidewalks. Davidson stated that with the Camp Cardinal Road extended Into Coralville it would then become a capacity problem. Novick asked if Camp Cardinal Road is extended that it doesn't necessarily have to go to Coralville. Fosse explained that the south end of Camp Cardinal Road currently ties into Melrose Avenue. SYCAMORE STREET-BURNS TO SOUTH CITY LIMIT. Fosse stated this project is similar to Rohret Road and asked Council how much development do they want to occur before improvements are done to the street. \ TAFT SPEEDWAY-NORTH DUBUQUE TO CALlBRIA. Fosse stated that this is now called No Name Street. Fosse said he has not had pressure for this project. FOSTER ROAD-WEST OF DUBUQUE. Fosse noted this Is tied to the sewer project. Fosse stated that If sewers are put in and development occurs there will be plenty of pressure to develop the street. SLOTHOWER ROAD. Horowitz asked if It Is a viable connection for Melrose to Rohret. Davidson stated it is for secondary access. In response to Horowitz, Franklin stated that there were discussions about extending It to the south and having it intersect with Rohret Road but offsetting it from the county road to the south so people wouldn't use It as a cut-through to Highway 1. Franklin stated that circulation for the area would be served by Phoenix coming up and intersecting Slothower Road but It would be made Into aT-intersection, ROHRET ROAD PROJECT, Fosse stated that no further explanation is needed. Kubbyasked how binding was the resolution regarding the date. Atkins stated that from experience at the time Council expressed its policy Intent, legally and practically. Atkins stated that reasons for which a resolution Is passed may change and that Council could undo the resolution. Atkins stated that If Council wouid choose to undo the resolution and In effect begin the process of Improving Rohret Road by way of assessment, that Council would have people saying that they did not understand that to be the decision of Council at that time. Atkins stated that by resolution, legally, Council did not preclude itself from taking away special assessments, FI3 -,_.--, ..-. ..._,_..__~"..:l,~. III 11 ~.4Jl,nl.l. JIIll"fIIMl,llJlMMlM~ ~.'''''~'' \ "........ ",-'- -.. ..~..-~--.....r ,.". - - '-r- --,- ..... .....~--".....-~-....,..-....~.- :~,.,~, '~.'. ,,;....11..., ~~J" .... , ",' "'~., '-' "', '~, \ t 1" '-''?/ f.' I' -., "" I .' " " ' . . , , 'I . \ " ~'. '. . " . . . ,. " , ,. 1 ','~' .' ,,'. , ) ..".,.: ;, .:.,.' I' . ':.~';'" ',',~:,. ,',' '.'i~' '1. I" :: '., .',' , : ".;,.:',1:: -,~:~~' ',"'":: ,'J 9 NEW STREETS. SOUTHGATE A VENUE. Davidson noted that this Is an extension of Southgate over to Giibert Street. EAST-WEST ARTERIAL, SCOTT BOULEVARD EXTENDED, FIRST AVENUE EXTENDED. Davidson stated Council is aware of the issues related to growth occurring In this quadrant of the town and it is tied to some of the sewer issue decisions that Councii will be making. In response to Kubby, Davidson stated that staff has proposed two lane extensions with rlght- of-way to possibly go wider in the future. McDonald asked if Councii decided to extend Scott and not do the east-west extension or First Avenue extension, can the cost for the subsequent development be borne by the developer as development occurs. Davidson stated a portion of them could. Franklin commented about the City's policies for paying for arterial streets. Franklin stated that when streets are put In ahead of development for some community reason the City pays for them. Otherwise, they are paid for as development occurs and the developer pays for the local size and the City pays for oversize. Franklin stated a third policy relates to annexation whereby the developer pays the full costs because development is out-of-sequence. Kubby asked as zoning changes occur can the conditional zoning agreement be used. Franklin stated costs could be negotiated through the conditional zoning as long as it Is fair, equitable and consistent. Staff and Councii discussed traffic patterns and the need for two or four lanes on First Avenue, Scott Boulevard extended and First Avenue extended. COLLECTOR STREET-HICKORY TRAIL TO ROCHESTER. Davidson stated this relates to a secondary access question and would Involve involuntary acquisition of property. Davidson stated that there is also a wetland Issue in that area. FOSTER ROAD-DUBUQUE STREET TO PRAIRIE DU CHIEN. Davidson stated this Is related to encouraging or discouraging development in the area. Atkins asked If the purchase of ground by a group of folks In that area affected this project. Davidson stated that the area purchased is south of this alignment. Franklin explained that the alignment runs along the drainageway there; and development would occur on the fingers of land to the north. Franklin stated the development to the south of Foster Road would be restricted somewhat by the purchase. CAMP CARDINAL ROAD EXTENDED. Davidson stated that staff has had extensive discussion on this project. Davidson noted that it would be an arterial street for west Iowa City and go between Highway 6 and Melrose Avenue. COURT STREET EXTENDED TO TAFT. Davidson stated that this would be in conjunction with the Windsor Ridge annexation area. Kubby stated that where there are street projects that involve sensitive lands It is Important for Councii to think In terms of priorities and protection and the Implementation of some kind of protection for those sensitive areas. BRIDGES: PEDESTRIAN OVERPASS. Kubby Inquired about the cost estimates for the pedestrian overpass project. Fosse stated that the cost Includes the addition of a sidewalk along the south side of the property, the stairs and the house. Fosse stated that the bridge projects, with the exception of the pedestrian bridge overpass, are all reconstructions of existing bridges. r-/3 - ."';' v..... -,........... \ ~.- - .. .-~.~- ....". .,.....~.......,....,...-.."..-,.--- ~.... ~.-........- .. . :':,' '" f~l.' ': ,'irl"'" "'., : t:~"';" "'8"" ":'.': """ , ',.". '" ,:' ,'\ . r, ..' \ ;' ;: . '!f .':. . ,i..' I ",' '1',. .' '.'" '\ :.,: , .. ',. ~, I ~ ""I , ' .1' ,'1' . - , I j, ;",',.1' ~,'r',?,\~,:,.,..'( . "', I :,' /.'_'." '"",' ",., 10 Davidson explained that the planning study was done for the pedestrian overpass and staff's position is reflective of the direction Council gave staff. Davidson stated under consideration is the creation of a good situation of traffic flow on Highway 6 in order to keep the adjacent neighborhoods clear of traffic to the degree that Is possible. Staff and Council discussed traffic flow. Kubby asked if there was.a way to increase the walk cycle across Highway 6 without causing major disruption to traffic flow. Davidson explained that whenever discussions are held with Traffic Engineer Jim Brachtel he always relates It to a piece of pie with sections carved out of it - if you add to the north-south you have to take it away from the east-west. Davidson responded to Kubby by saying that it Is certainly possible to add more time to the north.south pedestrian movements by restricting the east-west vehicular movements. Novick stated that people will cross at places other than the bridge. Davidson explained that putting a pedestrian bypass In does not eliminate pedestrian movements at street level. Davidson noted that the First Avenue location for the pedestrian bypass was selected and recommended by the Grantwood Neighborhood Association. Kubby inquired about funding sources, Davidson noted that the City anticipates obtaining approximately $3 million of STP funds over the next four years and there is flexibility with the use of that money. Council and staff discussed walk signal controls. Novick stated that both slowing down traffic for walk signals and putting up a bridge is needed. Novick stated that she would first like to try the less expensive project - putting In walk signals. Atkins stated that II Council decides on changing the walk cycles he will contact Traffic Engineer and report back to Council with additional Information. Majority of Council directed staff to change walk cycle times. Atkins stated that with bridge projects' Council can use financial policies to determine their priorities by placing the projects in order as they move up the state list and become eligible. Atkins noted that the pedestrian overpass project is a separate decision. Kubby stated that in agreeing to doing the walk lights Council Is not making a statement about the pedestrian overpass bridge at this point. Atkins stated decisions regarding projects can be made once priorities are set. Atkins stated that Traffic Engineer Brachtel can provide additional information for Council regarding walk cycles. MEETING SCHEDULED DISCUSSION: Council agreed to schedule the next CIP discussion on Monday, May 3, at 7:00 or 7:15 p.m, Meeting adjourned at 9:30 p.m. crtfk\l;C4.20,inl ~nJJPIT W.l#<>l<Io.-' twt,.,__...."o<<...--- I I I I I I I~/3 -~V"'" \ ".. - - ...-'----- - .. ......-..-~-- ......-r--'.-y - - ._~ --,- ... ....". - .... ".'.'..,"" ~l'::.,::~",~,.:,;t'''":'''':''i~';, .', :,':,,'.'0'" '-:.,\ -.,.. 'f" .,.' i ' ','",' 'I .", ' . '" ",' /- ,',~~;;,,-',r7~,.~:>'.":,,~~ "I~ .-\'.~': :\.~ .,".-:: :\','.:, ':."" , " ,- City of Iowa City MEMORANDUM Date: April 29, 1993 To: Mayor and City Council From: Re: Co cil Work Sesslon-CIP, April 20, 1993 - 5:45 p.m. in the Council Cha bers Mayor Darrel Courtne residing. Council membe~s: Courtney, McDonald, Kubby, Horowitz, Novick, Ambrisco. Sta present: Atkins, Helling, Karr, Franklin, Yuculs, Schmadeke, Fosse, Davidson, Trueblood, Scti on, Klingaman. Tape r corded on Tapes 93-35, Side 2; 93-39, All; 93-40, All. Reel 93-35, Side 2 City Manager Atkins stated that e hoped at staff and Council would review his April 14, 1993 memorandum regarding Capl allmp ovement program, hold a detailed discussion about the finances and resources avallabl dl uss the projects as listed, and go through an actual process of setting priorities. Atkin tated the CIP process Includes two elements: the technical/financial aspect and politi I aspect. Atkins noted that his April 14, 1993 memorandum regarding Capital I pr ement program includes a summary, "Financial Resources Capital Improvement rogra 1993.2000" and information about the major sources of money that would be vailable 0 finance the projects. Atkins stated that Public Works Director Chuck Schmade e, PCD Dire tor Karin Franklin, City Engineer Rick Fosse, and Transportation Planner Jeff D ids on are ~re ent to present Information regarding the CIP. Atkins said that projects are roken Into categorl s and that it Is Important in those categories to have similar values ap led to similar projects Atkins stated there is also a criteria for review included In the m orandum. FINANCES. Atkins st ed that the CIP list includes $ 25 million in requests, Atkins stated that the financial opt; ns available are subject to statu ry and charter regulations. Atkins stated that the tim frame established for the CIP proce s Is a seven year period of time, 1993.2000. Atkin stated staff made a general assumption at the financial policies outlined in the memorand are acceptable to Council and if that is t 1\ case, there Is approximately $112,000 avail Ie resources that could be utilized right now. Atkins stated the unknowns in financing th CIP are what Is going to survive Council policy scrutiny, the ability to carry these project from Council to Council, and financing Implications for the future, Atkins reviewed the ist of financial resources as follows. . Atkins stated that a general assumption is that little general funds monies will be put to ard capital projects. Atkins cautioned Council about using general fund money for major c ita I projects. Atkins stated that as a matter of policy, general fund is intended to suppor the City's operating program and services and that the general fund should be used for ca Ital projects only when it is absolutely necessary. I-/3 ......_ 1 M u., ...1 ... I. .....-~.I.IIIL..., A JfM!M.tto"N ~._.., lM:hl..JL.U""k.RFMl1l1.. -- ~,. v .. ... "..."" -........ - .. .. .."..---.. ~~7:-8'"'--'~~bj .,c.':~;'~/-:--;'-:i~t:---, ',-:- '..'~- >-,<;. ',':':'. .' ., [ d '171 ,!'.1 tf;ir' ,., .'. ,,', d. /_"'1'.,;.( :: J"J~~.;.:", ~:"l\'a"";')~:i':"- ": '.'."<'~':I'. .l:..,,;,.""~; 2 GENERAL OBLIGATION DEBT. Atkins stated that $12.5 million of general obligation debt Is projected to be available over the next seven year period. Atkins stated that It is assumed that property values will grow at a rate of three percent a year and the tax rate that is used for debt service would remain constant over the seven year period, Atkins stated that if that rate remains constant the proportion of taxes that are assigned for debt will diminish over the seven year period. Atkins noted that there is a 25% policy that says no more than 25% of tax revenues will be used for debt service. In response to Horowitz, Atkins stated that many projects would require a referendum. Council members discussed the City's AAA bond rating. Atkins stated the bond rating Is Important. Courtney noted that Interest rates in today's market between AA and AAA bonds are very, very small. \ Atkins stated the Issue of landfill fees. parking fees, water and wastewater fees make the assumption that the projects t at are clearly identifled~ being appropriate are to be funded by these fees. Atkins explain d that fees are charged c mmensurate with the capital that is to be secured in the form of d bt service on those fe s, Kubby raised concerns about the 140% increase in water rates a It applies to IIveZbi ty on a monthly basis. Kubby stated other options should be discusse . Atkins stated the City has not forma y adopted a ormwater fee policy; currently storm water management Is paid for by general re enues and eneral obligation debt; and it is believed that storm water management and its cost the co munity Is going to grow substantially because of federal regulations. Atkins stated that is making the assumption that Council will address an ordinance and/or policy that do t some type of storm water management fee to generate monies to pay for these projects tkins stated that under current law. a storm water utility district could be established utlllzin some sort of formula by which the City can charge people for stormwater management. ki s explained that the City will need to consider a stormwater management fee to financ stor water management projects required by federal and state regulations. City Engineer osse xplained that an Inventory will be needed and would consist of an aerial mappln of the C y to identify watersheds and existing storm sewers, Horowitz asked if the sto mwater ma agement inventory process could utilize the City/County mapping project. Fo se stated tha that aerial photography was flown at three different elevations over the ci and the 50-sc Ie and/or 100-scale maps will be useable provided there haven't been si Ificant changes I those areas. Atkins noted that Fosse has been in contact with the cit of Coralville regard g participation In this project. Novick inquired about the billing for storm water manage ent fee. Atkins stated that a form of a utility billing would be cons' ered. FEDERAL/STATE GRA S. Atkins stated that this Is ver much an unknown and very much a question of timing. rA.tkins noted that the policy remain that the City make the most of whatever state and f deral aids are available. In response t Horowitz, Davidson stated that there is flexibility wi the use of ISTEA money. Horowitz ask ~~hen is the Iowa-illinois Gas & Electric Com pan franchise up for renewal. Atkins stated t,,~t franchise agreement was adopted In 19S6 a d is up for renewal In the year 2001. A WATER. Atkins explained that surface water (Iowa River) is likely to be the City's source of water in the future. Atkins explained that two specific areas in the rules and regulations that are of concern are the turbidity and the chlorine, Atkins stated that the City of Iowa City will be scrutinized very closely by the DNR and EPA because Iowa City is one of the largest -- ~--.--..........._~ ~. .__forl~_Mllll"lM~~1M'JUlNJ\m~~1IlM II] \ ~ ,:....' ~t~l: ,.':rr,.,,' "-i, ,." ,,:; ~I " :' ,',.... :':'::, :':, ,.,:'. :,. ',!.}4,;:>'.Q"'.',' <.:,..' ,': :;:, '. ;:,:" : ,,;, ',,',:',.'~ ~" '.:, '''',:,: 3 surface water users in Iowa. Atkins explained that turbidity is a matter of clarity and the City cannot consistently meet the new limits. Atkins also noted that the City is concerned about Its ability to meet the new chlorine regulations. Atkins explained because the City will be unable to consistently meet the new limits, the City will have to put out notice to the public. Atkins stated other issues associated with the water project are the continued use of surface water, the extent of the use of well water, the location of the well system Inside or outside the City, plant location, and the need to put out a public concern notification. Atkins noted the City is entertaining discussions with the University of Iowa about the possible purchase of water to do some blending. Atkins stated the water project is estimated to cost $44 million. Atkins noted that policy is to pay for this project througl1 the use of user fees which means water revenue bonds. In re ponse to Kubby, PUbll~Works Director Schmadeke explained the University of Iowa us s river water and a Jorda well. Schmadeke stated the University has a reserve capacity fa greater than the City's. ovick asked how compliance with new regulations Is monitored. Schmadeke stated the Ity checks Itself and provides a notification if It is In violation. Cour ney asked how many allons the City pumps currently. Schmadeke stated that the City pum s an average of 7 t 7 Y, million gallons per day and 10 to 1 Oy, million gallons per day in the ummer. KUbbgin Ired about the decrease In capacity with the new regulations. Schmade e explained tha the chlorine contact time for water production. Schmadeke stated that i why the City ants to purchase two million gallons from the University. In response to bby, Sch~ deke expialned that the City has been trying to operate under the new standar and imp/ove turbidity, Schmadeke noted there will be periods where the City Is going to be 'n vlo~a Ion. Schmadeke noted that If the City can purchase two million a day from the Univ slty, he City could Improve its production level to the point that the City could meet the reg lat' ns. Kubby raised concerns about the lack of water conservation and education progra , Novick stated that the City should go beyond education and offer water saving waterhe~ s, air raiders, etc. at cost or less. Kubby asked if the City has met with the University y t out obtaining the two million gallons per day. Schmadeke stated yes. Atkins explained that if the City plans 0 move he treatment plant north of 1-80 the City will need to build a sewer line from th treatment plant down to the existing sanitary sewer because of the water's sludge. At . s noted tha once a sewer line is built there is a potential for growth and development In t at area. Amb 'sco inquired about the tlmeframe for the water project. Atkins stated tl) t the City will ave to initiate a program within a year. Schmadeke stated staff is lookjng at beginning co struction of the water project at the end of 1994 and finishing the proj 6t by the end if 1996, Horowitz asked who owns the property at the City's current water ant. Schmadeke stat d the City owns the property. Atkins stated that there Is a lot 0 Interest by the Universl regarding that property. McDonald asked Schmadeke if the C' y Is going to use surface ater to meet its future water needs. Schmadeke stated the C' y is going to have to use a ubstantial amount of surface water. Schmadeke stated ther IS not a good groundwater sup Iy In the county. Horowitz asked if the Coralville Reservoi is being considered. Schmadek stated that staff Is looking at the Coralville Reservoir a a water source. Schmadeke explai ed that the City is looking at three water sources: the Iver, the Jordan aquifer and the silurian aquifer. AIRPORT. Atkins xplained the airport and its master plan is stili under review, Atkins stated that he is unsure f what the cost will be for the project. Atkins stated that staff is using the assumption that no decision has been made on the options. Atkins explained that costs associated with the airport project will be split 90% federal!10% local. Atkins stated that If Council chooses to use debt to finance the City's share of the airport project, money will have to be reserved from the $12.5 total. Atkins explained that if the airport is moved to a new I-/3 \ I,' . \~' :" ",.... :', ~ ':. . ","" ,. ,~_~.. ,,' '" .;', ..~'" .,:~', , "f " , .~ ' -I' " . CJ ' , , ' , ' , .,t" .. ;::",r ~. .>r, ;- I ,\1 ,ii~~.', ". ':;: ._.',' 'I ",' '.' " , "''II , ,'.a ,\I.;.:. '. . . . , ,,' ,,,,,~t,~' t,~t',' ,I" ~. ,'I , r. I ,', . "" ". 4 site, It would require a referendum for borrowing, Atkins noted that if the airport is moved to a new site, a major sewer line will be needed at the current airport property site. LANDFILL Atkins stated City staff considers this project a mandate. Atkins stated that the assumption is being made that the tipping fees will be used to continue to finance the landfill. Horowitz asked if there is a way of going to get together with Cedar Rapids on financing a transfer station to connect a compostible facility. Atkins stated yes. Atkins explained a transfer station would depend upon who was going to carry the burden on capital financing for the composting process. Kubby asked Schmadeke for information regarding communities using a tipping fee based on volume instead of weight. Schmadeke sated some cities have a volume limit and pay for each garbage can for an additional fee. Kubby inquired about volume-based tipping fees. Atkins noted that landfills are space. Sc madeke noted that currently the City charges by ton and the City is taxed on a per-ton basis y the state as w~lI. Kubby stated it is her Ideal to have cost per space charged. / WASTEWATER. Schmadeke explained t t there is ~~monia and the City has to get rid of it. Schmadake explained the City can tre t ammo Ya either mechanically or with chlorine. Schmadeke said that the chlorine treatm t proc ss is dangerous for its employees and storage. Novick inquired about removing am oni In wetlands. Schmadeke stated that using wetlands to remove ammonia is not recomm nd ~ because It is not economical and there are questions about reliability because of cllmat changes. Kubby noted that she will try to obtain additional information regarding the us of wetlands to remove ammonia. Schmadeke stated that a mechanical process will trea 00 and suspendlble solids as well as treat ammonia. Horowitz asked if wetlands nd mechanical process could both be used. Schmadeke explained that il you build a conne ting sewer and used wetlands, the sewer between the two plants would only tr sport I Ished water from the north plant, which would not have the ammonia remov d. You ould stili have to use all the treatment processes at the north plant for BOD a d suspende solids. Schmadeke recommended money be used to build a treatment proce and to begi phasing out the north plant. Courtney Inquired about the north plant. Sc madeke stated hat the old section could be phased out and the new section used for st rmwater flows t t get Into the sanitary sewer system. Kubby asked for an explanatio about the relatio hip between increased capacity and ammonia treatment. Schmade e explained that the p ocess to remove ammonia is the same process used to remove BOD and suspended solids a d the City would have to double the capacity of its existing syste to remove ammonia. In r sponse to Novick, Schmadeke stated currently there are no plan to add employees. Schmadeke stated the s aff Is also recommending connec Ing the two plants together at the time It treats ammoni and to begin to phase out the us of the north plant. Schmadeke explained the locatio of the north plant Is not Ideal beca se of restricted space and odor problems. Schmad ke presented information about th chlorine treatment process. Schmadeke noted t at initially the City would load up the outh plant with Its maximum capacity so it coul store the greatest amount of chlorine a that plant. In response to Horowitz, Schmadeke stated that If state law holds the City h ~ ten year reprieve and has until November 1999 to have the facilities built. If EPA overrides the state, the City would have three years to complete the project. Courtney asked If the connection was made between the north and south plants does the City have to add capacity to the south Immediately. Schmadeke stated that is right. Schmadeke explained that the City can relieve the north plant by just making the connection given that it treats ammonia with chlorine. I-IS \ . ..... I' "c' " L~: "1;1, '.",-,~ I' ~":ZJ"cc"', "". ':. """),, ,', ;'., ' ::', , 'uii ':",;J~(-': (~:./'i,\,i:,,'::."', '. ,'> ,~"'. :' : ,,'~:- '.~' 5 Kubby Inquired about water and wastewater treatment rates. Atkins stated the City is now approaching a high average compared to other cities in Iowa. Atkins explained staff looked at water, sewer and current refuse rates. An average monthly bill was $35. Atkins explained that the projects proposed would cause a $35 average bill to increase to $57. SOUTHWEST INTERCEPTOR. Schmadeke explained project costs for the southwest interceptor is approximately $7.5 million. Schmadeke presented a map detailing the location of the southwest Interceptor sewer. In response to Council members, Schmadeke explained that at some point in time a southwest interceptor sewer will be needed for the west side drainage area to completely develop. Schmadeke presented information about the southwest Interceptor sewer as it relates to the Walnut Ridge Subdivision, Hawkeye Lift Station, and Camp Cardinal Road. PENINSULA SEWER AND LIFT STATION. Schmadeke explained thJt the gravity sewer is proposed to be tied into the sewer at Taft Speedwpy. SChmadek~rated that this project Is needed to provide for development of the penins I'a area and will b needed if the City builds a water treatment plant adjacent to the river orth of 1-80. it: madeke referred Council members to a map. Councilmembers dlscusse the locations fo a new water plant. Novick asked if the City would have to have ownershi or easement rj! hts in terms of getting water from the river to the water plant. Schmadek stated tzat he City would need easement rights. NORTH RIVER CORRIDOR SEWER. Schmad ke zot the project costs are estimated $425,000. Franklin presented information about the penin u area. Franklin noted that two road projects, Foster Road and Taft reconstruction, spi ff of the sewer extension. Franklin noted that property owners on the peninsula, Including e Elks Club, are interested in development In the area. Kubby asked why a separate sewe In is needed for the peninsula and Idyllwild area. Schmadeke stated there are basically t 0 di erent drainage areas. Horowitz asked If both the north river corridor sewer and Highl der a a sewer wouid be needed. Schmadeke noted that if the river location Isn't the first hoice t n the peninsula sewer would not have to be built. Novick asked how far north I being co idered for the water treatment plant. Schmadeke stated that a plant needs to e located i an area along the river where, under normal low flow the water depth in the ver Is sufflcle t that the City can draw a continuous flow into the plant. Schmadeke stated he consultants re to come back to the City with two locations along the river between 1- and the reservo that would be ideal sites to draw water from the river. Franklin no ed that placement of the plant will have impact on development in the area. Frank n noted that when chmadeke answered Horowitz's questions regarding substituting the north corridor for he peninsula, that that was in relationship to Its serving the wa er treatment plant. Frankh stated the peninsula sewer can serve two functions, one is fo growth on the peninsula nd one Is access to the water treatment plant if the water reatment piant is west, Fr kiln stated that If the water treatment plant were not buil there Council could make declsl n not to extend the peninsula trunk because Council did n t want to encourage development on the peninsula and you did not need it for the water tr atment plant. NORTHWEST TRUNK SE ER. Schmadeke explained this is extension to serve the north half of Walnut Ridge Subdivi ion. In response to Kubby, Schmadeke stated that the northwest trunk sewer was not Installed at the time the pipe was extended to the edge of the property because, at that time, staff did not feel Walnut Ridge was going to develop as fast as It has, 1-13 -~..~......- ...........- "....'--- -. r-......-..-......,,.~_.. ,.........--...7----,.- .. ~T-'" ~ ' ,~t7a',',-~-~-, ',:.~ /,.' "til '-'.,'~--,.:.~....:.,. ,~' /';::,"~.2.f/;':::C~#J,:'~.:::r ....,.::,:{:(.:, H:, ',':,",".' ,:,::'::;,',',: " s ABER AVENUE SEWER. Schmadeke explained this is the sewer line that lies south of Rohret Road extending from the existing southwest trunk west across Mormon Trek and Highway 218 to serve the area immediately south of the new school site along the south side of Rohret Road. Franklin stated this would allow development In a drainage area that Is within the. growth policies but currently outside the corporate limits. Schmadeke stated it Is in the southwest water shed area and includes SOO undeveloped acres, HIGHLANDER AREA SEWER AND LIFT STATION. Schmadeke stated this project assumes development along Scott Boulevard north of the ridge line where the east-west arterial would be located. Council members and staff referred to a map, In response to Kubby, Schmadeke noted that the river corridor sewer that was built in 1980 has the capacity to serve the undeveloped areas within the City plus 750 acres north of the Interstate. Novick asked If the City has ever contracted to sell water or sewer to ar ~s outside the corporate limits. Schmadeke stated no, it is the City's urrent policy to n t provide service outside the City limits. IDYLLWILD AREA SEWER PROJEC , Schmadeke re erred to an area map. SCOTT PARK AREA TRUNK SEWER. Schmadeke r ferred to an area map. Schmadeke stated this serves a drainage area including 00 acres e t of Scott Boulevard north of Court Street. Horowitz asked how much the devel per woul pay and how much the City's share would be In terms of the Glasgow property. Schm eke stated that the project does not include Bruce Glasgow's property. Schmade e not the care center would also tie Into the sewer. \ WEST SIDE TRUNK SEWER PROJECT, S madeke explained this Is a ten inch sewer line that currently extends west of Mormon Tr and serves the property north of Rohret Road. In response to Horowitz, Schmadeke sta d it would be going to the school and the Kennedy property. Kubby asked If Council dec' not to do the west side trunk sewer project where would the school sewage go. Sc a ke stated the school waste would stili go down through the same sewer. Frankll not that there are two final plats that are pending Council's decision on the west sid trunk. Franklin noted that with the west side sewers and development In the area there ill be a eed for the southwest interceptor to be put in. Horowitz asked If there was a I glcal sequ nce of staff's point of view. Schmadeke stated that if you wanted to accom date develo ment that will occur because of the school then the west side should be don , Council me bers and staff discussed development. Franklin stated that as Council move into deciding p 'orlties a sequencing of the projects will fall Into place. Franklin explained t at the phasing In rowth and development in terms of the list of CIP projects the City will 0 in the next seve years will also fall Into place. Franklin steted that in a certain sense b prioritizing the CIP ouncil is setting up for a new Comp plan. Council member Kub y requested that a map be a ailable, Atkins stated that a map locating the street projects c n be placed In the Public Wor s Conference Room. Atkins noted there are four categories of streets: new, existing improv d, unimproved and bridges. STREET RECONS RUCTION (EXISTING IMPROVED). NORTH DUBUQUE STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT. Fosse explained that North Dubuque Street is experiencing flooding and when the Iowa River is high it reduces the capacity of the City's storm sewers in the area. I-/3 - .-r;' v...... ---r..... ".-. ------- - .. .-----.~- ....r "l".... - - .....- -. -- -..,,. . p! -... ... ~".- .. ~~,~;-:{"t~) .>,i;ID',' """;':/: \',:" ;iC),: ,~" '" ,,:' ':' ..: ,',: ,..', ,<,;" "', \ ,. f'"f I '. r:~1' " i' - t, ~7~1' " I" ", ',I .I,l r' :,.:,.......1<, .~..;'}~:...,.. ~l'.'~... - _ \:.... I'~":':" " '., ~",: ,:,;::', ".",: ~\:,~" 7 BENTON STREET-GREENWOOD DRIVE TO ORCHARD. Davidson explained that staff Identified areas of concerns including capacity constraint. Kubby noted that the summary on the Benton Street project does not stated what the improvements would be. SYCAMORE STREET-HIGHWAY 6 TO DEFOREST. Fosse stated that this Is a capacity related item. Kubby asked why this project doss not go down to Lower Muscatine. Davidson stated that staff would probably look down to Lower Muscatine. Novick inquired about parking on the street. Fosse stated that parking is allowed north of DeForest. Davidson stated that any time you do something for capacity it helps. DODGE STREET-GOVERNOR TO NORTH DUBUQUE ROAD. Fosse explained this is very much a capacity related Issue and there is ressure from the DOT. Fosse noted that the intersection of Prairie du Chien and Dodge Str t Is now causing probl ms and it would be difficult to signalize it without widening it. Ho owitz stated that Hor ce Mann Elementary School has raised concerns regarding traffic and speed. Horowitz as ed If it is possible to Inhibit traffic coming down through Dodge Street v the east-west ar rial and Scott Boulevard extension. Davidson reminded Council that In owa City, peo e are coming downtown or to the University Hospital and even if you ge around the n rth end of town, at some point people are going to want to get to town, Davi son emph ized that most trips In Iowa City are still made from out-to-in In the morning an from In.t -out in the evening. \ HIGHWAY 6-LAKESIDE DRIVE TO SCO T B ULEVARD. Fosse explained that this is an extension of the existing divided four-Ian c ncept of Highway 6 Bypass. Fosse stated Its benefits would be providing turning Ian into the City's Industrial park and on Scott Boulevard and possibly to developments t he south. Fosse stated there is potential for state participation on these improvements. 0 rtney asked if right-of-way Is available. Fosse stated preliminary drawings show tha the Ity will need a little of additional right-of-way. Horowitz asked how many of the reet rojects could possibly Involve federal funds. Davidson stated almost all of them Horow tz asked how many of them would also need environmental assessment or envir nmentall pacts. Davidson stated that Is something to be evaluated on a project-by'proj ct basis. FIRST A VENUE-D STREET TO ADFORD. Da idson stated this is on the arterial street plan and Is tied to the Council's ul mate decision re arding extending First Avenue. MUSCA TINE AVENUE-BUR INGTON TO COURT Fosse stated that plans are to maintain a three-lane facility but getI' g adequate lane wldt . MELROSE A VENUE-BY I GTON TO HAWKINS, Fos e stated that this Item has been discussed previously. GILBERT STREET-HI HWAY 6 DUAL LEFT TURN L NES. Fosse emphasized this Is a very badly needed projec . Fosse noted there are rlght-of-w y constraints on the north side. Fosse explained that a gr at opportunity to construct this p ~ect would be during the connector sewer project bet een the two plants. _ \ BURLINGTON AN GILBERT STREET INTERSECTION. Fosse explained that USTEP funds are available. Fosse explained this project will add a left turn lane to the three legs of the Intersection that does not currently have it. Fosse stated another component of the project Is the Ralston Creek bridge on Burlington Street. Courtney raised concerns about the condition of Burlington Street. Fosse stated that the DOT has told the City if they wait a year they will help pay for the Burlington Street bridge. McDonald inquired about past work done i I I I , , , I I I I I I I I i , , ! I-13 , \ :>." Bl",:::,':;~:'," .::i;:"r:'" 'B',: . ,::.,.:;:.::',',~:" " ;,' "-:.;','" :'~ . '-',,"'.' "I" ,"i... ..:...~_... :"':.: '~... ,.', .,' ',:' 8 on the Burlington Street bridge over Ralston Creek. Fosse said previously the City applied an epoxy chip seal on it to try to slow down the rate of chlorides getting into the deck steel. Fosse stated there are two problems: the deck is corroding and the chip seal isn't sticking. RIVER STREET-RIVERSIDE TO WOLF. Fosse stated the existing pavement is deteriorating. WOLF AVENUE-NEWTON TO RIVER. Horowitz asked if the dangerous corner at the Wolf and River streets intersection could be eliminated. Staff referred to a map. TRAFFIC SIGNALlZA TION/ASPHAL T RESURFACING. Fosse explained this money Is used for periodic traffic signal improvement and overlay. STREET RECONSTRUCTION IFORMERL Y UNIMPROVED). MELROSE AVENUE-WEST HIGH T~IGHWAY 218. Foss stated this project connects the two divided four.lane segments wit similar type arrange ent. Courtney noted that Council recently received a petition for this roject. Fosse stat the project also adds sidewalks to the area. Horowitz raised concerns about the statem t that the construction of the Camp Cardinal Road from Melrose to Hl9h~y 6 would sig flcantly Impact this portion of Melrose Avenue. Davidson stated that this p oject does n relate to a capacity problem but that it is a safety-related one without sidewa s. Davids stated that with the Camp Cardinal Road extended into Coralvilie it would then become capacity problem. Novick asked If Camp Cardinal Road is extended that it doesn' neces arlly have to go to Coralville. Fosse explained that the south end of Camp Cardinal Ro d c rently ties into Melrose Avenue. SYCAMORE STREET.BURNS TO SOUTH Rohret Road and asked Council how improvements are done to the street. ITY LIMIT. Fosse stated this project Is similar to h development do they want to occur before TAFT SPEEDWAY.NORTH DUBUQU Name Street. FOSTER ROAD.WEST OF DUBU UE. Fosse n ted this Is tied to the sewer project. Fosse stated thet If sewers are put in nd developmen occurs there will be plenty of pressure to develop the street. SLOTHOWER ROAD. Horo Itz asked If it is a v ble connection for Melrose to Rohret. Davidson stated It Is for sec ndary access. In respon to Horowitz, Franklin stated that there was discussions about ext nding it to the south and Ii ving it Intersect with Rohret Road but offsetting It from the cou ty road to the south so peop e wouldn't use it as a cut-through to Highway 1. Franklin sated that there are discuss! s about Phoenix coming up and intersecting Slothower oad but It would be made into a J-intersection. ROHRET ROAD PROJ T. Fosse stated that no further expl nation Is needed. Kubbyasked how binding was the r solution regarding the date. Atkins sta Etd that from experience at the time Council express its policy Intent, legally and practlcaliy. Atkins stated that reasons for which a resolution is assed may change and that Councli could undo the resolution. Atkins stated that if Council ould choose to undo the resolution and in effect begin the process of Improving Rohret Road by way of assessment, that Council would have people saying that they did not understand that to be the decision of Council at that time, Atkins stated that by resolution, legally, Council did not preclude Itself from taking awey special assessments. .T-13 """ \ ".-.- - -- - .............-....-~-- ......r ., -r - - "--r- ....- ,.~ W' -.....- ... "<>'ffi.""" :':~~"::'I" ':~l':"'" :....", ',...',:,,"':',:.'" , ," ,. {. J.,., '1/'" ,r .',." .,. . I.. ' ,1. " " " '" ,J :. -' ;:",:\.1 (, ,: "~~"OC, ' "" , . ";::_, ',. , ':~""" '.' ;.' 9 NEW STREETS. SOUTHGATE A VENUE, Davidson noted that this is an extension of Southgate over to Gilbert Street. EAST-WEST ARTERIAL. SCOTT BOULEVARD EXTENDED, FiRST AVENUE EXTENDED. Davidson stated Council is aware of the issues related to growth occurring In this quadrant of the town and It is tied to some of the sewer issue decisions that Council will be making. In response to Kubby, Davidson stated that staff has proposed two lane extensions with rlght- of-way to possibly go wider in the future. McDonald asked if Council decided to extend Scott and not do the east-west extension or First Avenue extension, can the cost for the subsequent development be borne by the developer as development occurs. Davidson stated a portion of them could. Franklin commented about paying for arterial streets. Franklin stated that when streets are put In ahead of evelopment for so e community reason the City pays for them. Otherwise, they are paid f r as development curs and the developer pays for the local size and the City pays for ov rsize. Franklin s ted that a third way to pay for the streets is through an annexation w reby the devel per pays for full amount of the costs because development Is out-of-sequ nce. Kubby sked as zoning changes occur can the conditional zoning agreement be used Franklin st ed costs could be negotiated through the conditional zoning as long as It is fair, equitable nd consistent, Staff and Council discussed traffic pa terns nd the need for two or four lanes on First Avenue, Scott Boulevard extended and irst Avenue extended. COLLECTOR STREET-HICKORY TRAIL T ROCHESTER. Davidson stated this relates to a secondary access question and would in Ive involuntary acquisition of property. Davidson stated that there Is also a wetland issu in that area. FOSTER ROAD-DUBUQUE STREET T PRAI IE DU CHIEN. Davidson stated this is related to encouraging or discouraging develop ent in t e area, Atkins asked If the purchase of ground by a group of folks in that area all t this pro ct, Davidson stated that that area that was purchased would be to the south 0 this allgnme t. Franklin explained that the alignment runs along the drainageway there an there are fin ers of land that come In from the north, Franklin stated the developmen to the south of oster Road would be restricted somewhat by the purchase. CAMP CARDINAL ROAD EXT NDED. Davidson stat d that stall has had extensive discussion on this project. Davidson n ed that It would be an rterlal street for west Iowa City and go between Highway 6 and M Irose Avenue. COURT STREET EXTEND TO TAFT. Davidson state hat this would be In conjunction with the Windsor Ridge annex tlon area. Kubby stated that here there are street projects that Involve sensitive lands it s Important for Council to think' terms of priorities and protection and the implementation of some kind of sensitive protect I n for those sensitive areas. BRIDGES: PEDESTRIAN OVERPA S. Kubby Inquired about the cost estimates for the pedestrian overpass project. Fosse stated that the cost includes the addition of a sidewalk along the south side of the property, the stairs and the house, I-13 ~; "':',~;l'(~ :}!(::',' ',;</' :':, :".,;cJ:," ,', ,'.',:', /,' ' :,:',;.','~' ,.. :'<'~'!1"" , ")~l. ,'. ,~"~ ',,' JCt ",' ".',','.' " . , , t ' ,^,' .'. II'," 10 Fosse stated that the bridge projects, with the exception of the pedestrian bridge overpass, are all reconstructions of existing bridges. Davidson explained that the planning study was done for the pedestrian ovarpass and staff's position is reflective of the direction Council gave staff. Davidson stated under consideration is the creation of a good situation of traffic flow on Highway 6 in order to keep the adjacent neighborhoods clear of traffic to the degree that is possible. Staff and Council discussed traffic flow. Kubby asked if there was a way to Increase the walk cycle across Highway 6 without causing major disruption to traffic flow. Davidson explained that whenever discussions are held with Traffic Engineer Jim Brachtel he always rei a es It to a piece of pie with sections carved out of It - If you add to the north-south you h e to take It away from the east-west. Davidson responded to Kubby by saying that it is ertainly possible to add more time to the north-south pedestrian movements by restricti the east-west pedestrian movements. Novick stated that people will cross at places oth r than the bridge. Davidson explained that by putting a pedestrian bypa (in it does not el' Inate pedestrian movements from the street. Davidson noted that the F' st Avenue locati n for the pedestrian bypass was seilicted and recommended by the Grant ood Neighbor od Association. Kubby Inquired about funding sources, Davidson noted th t the City an 'cipates obtaining approximately $3 million of STP funds over the next four ears and t re Is flexibility with the use of that money. Council and staff discussed walk Ignal co rols. Novick stated that both slowing down traffic for walk signals and putting up a brldg s needed. Novick stated that she would first like to try the less expensive project put ng in walk signals. Atkins stated that If Council decides on changing the walk cycle he ill contact Traffic Engineer and report back to Council with additional information. Major tv, of Council directed staff to change walk cycle times. \ Atkins stated that with bridge projects C n II can use financial policies to determine their priorities by placing the projects In order s th y move up the state list and become eligible. Atkins noted that the pedestrian overp s proj ct Is a separate decision. Kubby stated that in agreeing to doing the walk lights C uncllls ot making a statement about the pedestrian overpass bridge at this point. Atkin stated de Islons regarding projects can be made once priorities are set. Atkins stated hat Traffic Engineer Brachtel can provide additional Information for Council regarding alk cycles. MEETIN Council agreed to schedule t next CIP discussion n Monday, May 3, at 7:00 or 7:15 p.m. Meeting edjourned at 9:30 cl.rklce4.20.inl I- /:5'