Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1993-11-23 Bd Comm minutes """""''fIII!('''. --- --~.---..- \ ,\ n~\j ) r --"-... .-'-"'~-----' .,- - - ...,~....... ... ___" ...__r.. f T -. I " , I., ,'rl ',' '"".,' ",-I '/~: '. ".' :'.' ,.:' f~~".' ,', ' .~. :.' ,l~~" \. I" : I , Hayor's Youth Employment program Hinutes Board ot Direotor's Heeting September 22, 1993 Board Hembers Present: Karen Heimer, Pat Schnack, Paul Engler, Julie PUlkrabek, Jean McCarty, Joan Vandenberg, Dave Jacoby and Barry Kucera Statt Hembers Present: Ben O'Meara, Linda Miller, Mick Bowers, Cokie Ikerd, and Clark McFerren Call to Order: Barry Kucera called the meeting to order at 4:05 p.m. I. Introduotions and Weloome: Barry welcomed all in attendance. II. Approval ot Minutes: Minutes from the August 25, 1993, meeting were approved by, consensus. III. Additional Agenda Items , Correspondenoe Reoeived IV. New Business: I ~ Ii I' !I 'I' I' i;' - II I Ii :\ i' 'I I, I' I ~ 'II Ii 'I 1. Ben opened discussion regarding Agency Day at the Old Capitol Mall on September 25, 1993. MYEP will have a table 'set up near the book store. We will pass out program information sheets and "We Deliver" pamphlets. All staff will participate. We will try to get people to pledge to MYEP for the Hospice Road Race. Jean McCarty suggested that we hand out candy or gum. 2. Ben reported that he collapsed programs on the budget. At the end of FY94 MYEP will be approximately $7,000 in debt and by the end of FY95 we will be approximately $3~0 in the positive according to the budget. 3. Ben reported that MYEP hired a Project Manager for the "We Deliver" program. Clark "Mick" McFerren started in the position on September 13, 1993. 4. Discussion was engage1 concerning the participation of the board members in fund raising. Ben reported that MYEP did a large mailing to parents and work site supervisors of previous as well as current clients. Also, Ben handed out a letter and ten (10) postcards to each board member for them to mail or hand deliver in order to get pledges. Joan said that she would be willing to do a mailing to MYEP's previous board members. It was suggested that at this point we nominate officers for this year. A slate of officers was given by Paul. He suggested that Barry remain as President, Dave as Vice President, Loren as Secretary and himself (Paul) as Treasurer. Joan motioned to approve this slate. Julie seconded the motion. The motion was carried. I ' I 1\ I, 5. Ben opened discussion on the 3 on 3 basketball tournament as a fund raiser. He received some information from Ted Wernimont on a specific organization called Gus Macker. Ben reviewed the budget necessary for Gus Macker to organize this and he feels that MYE~ could do this on their own with some volunteer support. Ben is looking' at March or April as a target for this tournament Q.~08 ,. - I i , I t I I i I r - ...,~- ..'-... .-,-".- ~. ... - --- -,~... ... --- - ..~~ ,. " i~' ""cl" .:1/', I,~(r,-~-:-~'.'" ", , -'.', ,~: ''':'1-.- .'....;,., '1' -, . to take place. It was suggested that we get some of the Iowa Hawkeye athletes to assist ,in promoting the tournament. V. Old Busiuess 1. Committee Reports: a) Paul provided a Finance Committee Report. He reported that the committee reviewed the budget. It was suggested to Ben that he collapse some of the programs. He'collapsed all of the programs into two (2) programs, employment and corps. The budget appeared to be in good shape. 2. Program Reports: a) Linda passed out a revised agency program sheet. A detailed description was given for each of MYEP's programs and she also provided data on diversity. It was explained that the Transition prog~am is operating at a deficit because the unit of service was so low for the last fiscal year, but for FY94 it has been increased. She handed out a sheet describing a program called "Lend me your suits". This is done in conjunction with the Savvy Boutique, which is a very nice second hand store. ' b) Mick reported that ratings for the ICC came down from Des Moines and they were great. Mick and Ben will be going to Des Moines on October II, to meet Duane Leitch and JoAnn Callison. The YACC was also a success although we encountered a small obstacle. MYEP will need to reimburse the University of Iowa for supplies and tools. This has always been the case according to Warren Slebos at the U of I Recreation Services. c) Mick "Clark" McFerren was introduced as the new Project Manager for the "We Deliver" program. He reported that MYEP has joined the Chamber of Commerce and he is currently meeting with marketing directors of some of the area banks. He has four (4) kids training currently for the program. JUlie suggested that "We Deliver" try focusing their attention on local law firms because they always have a need for this sort of thing, d) Discussion was again angaged in regards to a fund raising committee. Ben felt that there is a need for a committee for this specific purpose. It was then suggested that all board members be directly involved in fund raising. Joan made a motion to approve this. Paul seconded the motion. The motion was carried. IV. Adjourn: The meeting was adjourned at 5:30 p.m. The next board meeting is October 27, at 4 P.M. Mark that downl o'clock in the afternoon I ~/l L. ' I- , 7fX,~Iflr- ore Forbes Secretary Four ~IY )fJlJ((L' Ben O'Meara -- Executive Director A5BRDMIN.SEP ~~O~ - 'I I I I I , , ' . ii: \ 'I !I,I I, r ;i " IF I' I I' I' , i I f: II I i I: I " , i Ii ,{ I' Ii II 'Ii .. '~) III --- ~...... ~ ..-'...... -- --- -,....".-..........---------,~ .... ~...........---.. -~---y"".......,-.......--- ~-".--- --~ ! . -.: ("I',: ':,/", ' j:i: .,tl"~' " ':, ,;', : ,,' ': , ; , : t.:..'.,." '. ',~.: .5]::, '", " I 'J"",' / MINUTES IOWA CITY AIRPORT COMMISSION TUESDAY. OCTOBER 14. 1993 - 5:30 P.M. IOWA CITY TRANSIT FACILITY , 1 I I I I I ! MEMBERS PRESENT: John Ockenfels, Howard Horan, Pat Foster, Richard Blum, Robert Hicks STAFF PRESENT: Anne Burnside, Ron O'Neil CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Ockenfels called the meeting to order at 5:40 p.m. A quorum of the Commission was present. , , APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Hicks asked for a clarification on what study was referenced on the first page. Ockenfels said this was the Feasibility study that was completed in February. The minutes of the September 21, 1993, Commission meeting were approved as submitted. , , , ' I " " I II! i " 1 Ii: ' I',!',' H '! /1' I fl' I' Ii l'I" :,: I !: !I 11 Ii i I II 11 ,'/ I AUTHORIZATION OF EXPENDITURES: Blum made a motion to pay the bills as presented. Horan seconded the motion and it passed 5 - O. PUBLIC DISCUSSION - ITEMS NOT ON AGENDA: , No items were presented. " . . ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION/ACTION: a. AlP Project 3-U-0047-03/Haster Plan - Ockenfels stated it was discussed at the last meeting that a Master Plan decision would be made at this meeting. since that time, questions have been raised that will delay making that decision. Blum made a motion to table this item until after the economic impact study is completed by the Iowa City Planning Department. Foster seconded the motion. Blum said his reasoning for waiting is that the general public views the economic impact study as being an important part of the decision making process. He said that the Commission and those who have followed the Feasibility study closely know that the economic impact study is a separate issue, but those who haven't attended the meetings and get all their information from the news media are not aware of the difference. Ockenfels was concerned that the delay will cause Iowa city to miss a deadline for funding for a Master Plan. In order to have a project scheduled in the last quarter of 1994, applications must be submitted to the lOOT for revitlw by October 29, 1993. FAA AlP preapplications must be channeled through the lOOT. :i Ql/C' ..-1 LI .', ~".. ....... -~...,~- ~--~..-I~.... ~ - --- ."..."'~-------~~... -.......- ...--.~.....-; \ . , ' , ( " '- . - .-, ",: " t "I ' 'I I It", . " > - . '. .:' "1. :. . '(.:. c' , 'j~ <'.--:~'~' '.. ': '. " ,I, ' . " , '.' . \ \ , l ., . , . ',_" ,_ '. r' . '1 Hicks thought the Master Plan study decision should be made now. He stated that in his discussions with the FAA, he was told that this airport is very safe. But if the airport is to remain in the current location, some additional safety areas will need to be purchased. Hicks said that he knows the airport has a positive economic impact on the 'community, he just doesn't know how much. Hicks said the commission should just be concerned with planning for the next few years, not long term. He said businesses are concentrating on short term planning as opposed to long term planning. He also said the airport will probably not be viable in the present location in the next few years. He just does not want to spend any money at this time. other Commission members stated that it is more responsible to develop a Master Plan to include long term as well as short term planning. There was concern about investing several million dollars at the current site if there is a probability the airport would be moved in the next few years. It was stated that less local funding would be required for a new site than upgrading the current site. Ockenfels did not want to eliminate t;he option of voting for a Master Plan study before the economic impact study is completed. He was concerned about missing funding deadlines and not being eligible for funding until 1995. Ockenfels called for the question on the previous motion. The motion passed 3 - 2, with Ockenfels and Hicks voting no. , b. capital improvement projeots - O'Neil presented a partial list of capital improvement projects for the Airport. He said the commission should prioritize the projects and decide what projects should be including in the FY 1995 budget process. The Commission discussed several projects, including roof replacement on three buildings, ADA requirements and pavement repairs and replacement. Some of the projects are fundable through the state and federal AlP programs, but, a current Airport Layout Plan is required before a grant can be applied for. The ALP is part of the Airport Master Plan. o. FY95 budget - O'Neil discussed the Finance Department's projection for the 1995 budget. The Commission reviewed the budget line item by line item and made a few changes. A comment was made that the operations budget has remained consistent over the last few years, with the largest changes due to capital improvement projects. O'Neil said that a capital improvement project list will be included in a new Master Plan. Because it will be a couple of years before a new Master Plan is completed, capital improvement projects normally eligible for AlP grant funding may have to be funded ,entirely with local funds. ~l/cq tk:I--L1 .. - , I, , i , , . J: 1 II I , jiI ! I" ii I' I' " ij, , " I: Ii I: n " "I ( I! I '~ I I,: I I 1:1 I , I I I II'.' !I [ Ii ""'iIIlIP"' "'1(",.' - '-'1--- ""- ~ ..-, ....... - -- ."......-......-- ---- ..,~... -...., - - y ... ~ - . ; , I ", ,'cl -./ '" "'.'-/:' I';';'t":' ",;' ' : - " ,[" .-'.'. . : . -., \ .' ,.' . - . ~ .' -' ~ . , , ~. . There may be an opportunity for state ,funding, but that is a 70/30 split, as, opposed to the 90/10 split from the FAA. The local matching share could be substantially more. CHAIRPERSON'S REPORT: ockenfels questioned why there was a boat in the parking lot by the united hangar. O'Neil will discuss the issue with Van winkle-Jacob Engineering, who lease the building. ' ockenfels said that several council candidates contacted him after it was reported in the Press citizen that all the candidates were sent an agenda for the september commission meeting but none attended the meeting. They explained their reasons for not being able to attend. ' I I \ COMMISSION MEMBERS' REPORT: Blum reported on the city council candidate night on october 6. There were only a couple of questions concerning the Airport. Horan said that while in Davenport last week, he took some time to tour the Davenport Airport to get a perception of what other general aviation airports are doing. Horan spoke to a planning class at the University of Iowa concerning current issues at the Airport. Horan, Foster and ockenfels will attend the FAA central Region AlP Conference in Kansas city on October 29. Burnside will research whether or not this requires a notification of a public meeting since a majority of the co~ission is going. Hicks asked about the progress of Menards. O'Neil stated that Menards has had their plan reviewed and approved by the FAA. Fill dirt is being hauled to the site now. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT: O'Neil said the economic impact study survey 1s being conducted this month. council candidates were sent some resource material concerning the Airport. Fuel prices for equipment used at the Airport will increase because of new emission standards. The recodification process for the city Code of ordinances is progressing on schedule. The cedar Rapids Airport has received a $ 200,000 grant to conduct a new Master Plan study. " I ...- -, - \ ~l/()9 -- :' ....' - , l I I I I I I , I I' I Iii Ii I,' 1\ " II !I' I\' /I n ,:1 i, ~ r Ii ,j , I J I 'I "J ,',"',) i " j I, , ~', ~ " ~ ..,.,. - " I I I I 'f~"" - ~--.;,;~---'~ -, - Ill.'..'" - .......,.-- -,-Ill~'" .........- , :,', "f~l' ' ,i I "''-I. ' ,:/ 't' , ,',,'.': ','," :. . . _ . _':~, .~.'; ? - L " / /'\ " 1 :' .';/' -----.-.----- ---'-" SET NEXT REGULAR MEETING: The next regular meeting was set for November 16, 1993, at 5:30 p.m. ADJOURNMENT: Foster moved to adjourn the meeting at 8:18 p.m. Blum seconded the motion and the meeting was adjourned. "'_'_"""j" h"',... ' ..... --..- -- ~,~Qf, ! " I I I I , , I i ! I J'" ! \ , , " II Ii '., 1,' Ii 'II' I' ,I iF Ii: I" :: - 1'( 'Iii: Ii il. I.: i' I;: I Ii \ 'I., I. I \,'.' I) .,!;: " , I, ii',. :1 , , , i I """''fIII!('r. - --"'" ----.... -, ~ , ~fI) o ", ~.......... ..-'WIIW"'- , . , .', ,.' ; I -' - - : ' t ' I ,/ / . ,i...,,' ..d" ,," . " ,: , '" ,,' I',.'.' ' ',,", . -~.. --. - . . i / ,...1 ) IJv--{..t- MINUTES BROADBAND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION WEDNESDAY. SEPTEMBER 15.1993 - 5:30 P,M, CIVIC CENTER LOBBY CONFERENCE ROOM MEMBERS PRESENT: Joyce Patton, Trey Stevens, Roger Christian, Cordell Jeppsen MEMBERS ABSENT: Tim Finer STAFF PRESENT: Shaffer, Helling. Bob Hardy. Anne Burnside, Brau OTHERS PRESENT: John Forrest, Carol Spaziani LIST OF MATTERS PENDING COMMISSION/COUNCIL DISPOSITION Cable TV refranchising/renewal process, SUMMARY OF DISCUSSION Anne Burnside reported there should be no problem adopting rate regulation rules within the 120.day window opened by applying to the Federal Communications Commission for certification for rate regulation authority, Burnside provided an opinion that there is no prohibition of commercials on the Government Channel provided the commercials are limited to helping put on government programming and the channel does not become a principally a commercial channel. A notice to cure letter has been sent to TCI regarding the transfer of the franchise to TCI from Heritage. The letter following, the procedures outlined in the 1984 Cable Act, provides TCI an opportunity to comply with the franchise agreement. A lengthy response wes received which was non,responsive, The deadline for TClto respond to the RFP has been extended to October 20. PATV will hold an Open House/Info Extravaganza September 23 at 7:00 p,m, in Library Meeting Room A. The library has identified creating local history video as a high priority and hopes that with the cooperation of the Community Television Group videos can be produced on the 1996 stete sesquicentennial celebration and the centennial celebration of the Iowa City Public Library, Pat Braunger has been appointed as the Iowa City Community School District Media Coordinator and is quite interested in cable- related applications, Bob Hardy reported on the efforts of the local access channels to create a formal arrangement in which they could share resources, work cooperatively and ultimately better serve the community, Shaffer reported the City will be filling outlhe necessary forms with the FCC to regulate rates. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order at 5:30 p.m, APPROVAL OF THE BTC MINUTES Jeppsen moved to approve the July 21. 1993. minutes, Seconded by Patton, Unenimously approved. 6?~ 10 . i i' i, i i I j I: i' " , I" I: I' , .' I I j I j I " , I Ii ~ ii II " " 'I i" I., Ii I, r: t, :i '" ii I ,; I' " , 'i-. I i i , I I I I d '''-,,, 'I - '. "1 - ~---\.& ..-, ...... - .... ...- - - -,~ ~ - - ' (, ",-' ' '- \' '-' "",' , " .:,..tl "I' .'9 ,,:~t': ", ',', '~ ,.....;.... " ,',-- . ~,..... ' " .!. Broadband Telecommunications Commission September 15, 1993 Page 2 ANNOUNCEMENTS OF COMMISSIONERS None, LEGAL REPORT -. ... -~. '... ... ~ \ Anne Burnside reported that after reviewing the FCC rules on rate regulation, there seems to be no reason why an ordinance setting forth rate regulation and rules cannot be adopted within the 120.day window opened by sending the FCC the franchise authority certification form, Burnside also provided an opinion regarding commercials on the Government Channel. There was no prohibition in any code, but the federal mandate to have government access implies that it is not principally a commercial channel. So long as the commercial program- ming is limited to that needed to help put on government programming and it does not become principally a commercial channel, there should be no problem. Specific rules could be adopted by the City Manager's designee. Shaffer said that the types of Information Service advertising screens envisioned would be dealing with economic development Issues, tourist related, theaters, welcome wagon, etc, Burnside reported that Linda Gentry has sent a notice to cure leller to TCI regarding the transfer of the franchise from Heritage to TCI, This leller, in accordance with the 1984 Cable Act, sets forth the City's position that TCI is in non- compliance with the franchise agreement and gives them an opportunity to rectify the situation, A lengthy response has been received which was rather non.responsive. Linda Gentry may recommend that the City Council adopt a resolution of notice of violation. Shaffer reported that TCI representatives came to his office and expressed a concern with paying the City's refranchislng consulting fees, Shaffer suggested that they note this on their response to the RFP. The TCI representatives also asked if we were in the formal or informal refranchising process, Shaffer told them that we were in both, TCI seems to want to be in the informal process, The City Council has previously adopted a resolution initiating the formal process, Shaffer said he thinks they're testing the \Vaters on this point. Burnside reported that the City Council adopted a resolution extending, for a second time, the deadline for TCI to respond to the RFP, 'Burnside noted that the extensions make TCl's inquiries regarding the formal or informal process inconsistent as federal deadlines do not apply in the informal process. This seems to indicate that TCI is anticipating difficulty in getting their response to the RFP finished under the formal guidelines, Stevens said that granting a 45.day extension when they asked for 60 indicates the Council's reluctance to grant more extensions, The deadline is now October 20. Shaffor said the important point is if TCI is acting in good faith, Jeppsen said the Commission needs to see proof of good will, Christian asked if the delay was coming from the local company or from corporate, Shaffer said he believes the delays are originating from corporate due to the initiating of rate regulations. Burnside said if TCI misses the 30.day deadline to come into accord with the franchise agreement, the City would probably serve TCI with an official notice of violation. There would be no further formal action, the non.compliance would be a matter of record and be considered during the refranchising process, In Anne Burnside's opinion, the manner in which TCI responds to the situation is significant because it indicates how and if TCI is willing to work with the City, ,',.' - ------- Gl~ 10 - , , , , , 1 , I, " II II 'I l' i :1 'i I' Ii' I, , 11' I: " .. , I " t " , :' I, " J' " , , I: \,' " I Ii I " '. I II I I I' I I II " " i ,I . . . ", .... \ ., -., I .. _ - ' L/I' - " ',/1 '/d' , ' -: "L:J' ,',I,T '-~', a '.'.?f-' - ",,' ',' / " Broadband Telecommunications Commission September 15, 1993 Page 3 PATV REPORT A written reported was provided. PATV will hold an Open House/Info Extrava9anza on September 23.1993, from 7:00-9:00 p,m. in Meeting Room A of the Iowa City Public Library, Maureen McCormick. Mike Preftakes, Steve Wurtzler and Matt Bowerman have joined the Board of Directors, The lawsuit against Doyle Detroit and PA TV is being handled by Shuttleworth and Ingersoll in Cedar Rapids and is proceeding slowly, TCI REPORT Bill Blough was absent. Stevens reported he had held a conversation with Blough in which he indicated he believed the retransmission consent negotiations between TCI and KGAN will be resolved positively, LIBRARY REPORT Carol Spaziani reported that Rick Amundson has been hired as an Audio Visual Technician, Two library staff members attended a workshop held by the State Library of Iowa and the State Historical Department to learn how to produce local history videos, Taking the lead in creating local history video is a high priority in the library's five-year plan, During FY95 and FY95 the library hopes to work cooperatively with the Community Television Group to produce local history videos for the 1996 state sesquicentennial celebration and the centennial celebration of the Iowa City Public Library, The library received notice from the State Library of Iowa that they have been named as a potential site for inclusion in phase three of the Iowa Communications Network, Carol Spaziani wrote a letter complaining about the way TCI handled the channel realignment. The library received one day's notice and was assured subscribers would receive mail notices before the change, The notices were late and rather than specifically identifying Channel 1 0 as the library channel. the notice merely indicated that it was a local access channel. Spaziani requested new channel lineup cards be sent in the next billing, Shaffer reported he has talked to Bill Blough and TCI will send new channel lineup cards after October 6 when the situation with KGAN is resolved, Shaffer, said the channel lineup changes are due to the FCC rate regulation rules and TCl's efforts to come close to the benchmark to minimize a decrease in revenues, Helling said that if an agreement is reached with KGAN, it is not sure if WHBF. Channel41n the Quad Cities, will replace KGAN ' because the dispute is more likely between CBS and TCI rather than the local subsidiaries of the two, Stevens noted that KGAN and Cox Cable have come to terms, ECC REPORT Shaffer reported he has met with the new Media Director for the Iowa City Community School District. Pat Braunger, and she is interested and excited in the developments surrounding the Community Television Group, i' ~"'D I i: . I ~ i Iii It , I I I, r I " II ,: I :i h. " I . , If i r r.; 1 I, ! " n I' i " I I , I I I i , ti " ,I , I 11 ! 'I ;' I il -...,.,,--.r,,' ---- ---'" ~. ....- ~ 7".......- ~- -.-.-~........- ...,~-- r -...- -- - ~ ,...------- , 'I' ~, I . . . . 1,- _ CI j' '-'21 _ c;:- - -' ,', - I..:,' . r~.. r'.,.. :.3 .... .~~ .. / " . / -'I Broadband Telecommunications Commission September 15, 1993 Page 4 CABLE TV ADMINISTRATOR REPORT i I I ! I ! r I Shaffer reported receiving eight complaints-two about getting cable lines buried. one about the late fee. one about some programming on PA TV. two about the channel lineup changes, one about a mess left after burying a cable wire, and one about a discriminatory disconnect which has since be resolved. Tom Flanders, the Interactive Specialist, will be resigning. His job is now being advertised. A production booth for the Council Chambers will be constructed on the second floor. Efforts are continuing to resolve the noise problem in the studio space of the Government Channel. Shaffer reported he is working on a letter responding to PATV's request to extend their contract with the City. The Government Channel is looking into buying a satellite dish and a production van, Shaffer said Rice, Williams will soon being working on a draft ordinance. Shaffer will draft a letter to the cable company requesting the information they sent to the FCC in regards to rate regulation, Work is continuing to locate external funding for interconnection with the Iowa Communications Network. the INET, and School Net. COMMUNITY TELEVISION GROUP REPORT Bob Hardy reported that the CTG grew out of meetings begun two years ago to meet issues such as telephone entry into video programming, refranchising and the impact they would have on community television. The CTG is made up of representatives of the government channel, PA TV. the library channel, the educational channel and the Senior Center. In the last six months the meetings have taken off as members sought ways to become more efficient in the face of declining resources. One area of discussion has been how to work together and be mutually supportive to accomplish things for the community which hasn't previously been possible working independently. Another primary objective is more effective use of resources. Communication among the community channels has generated enthusiasm for the potential, opportunity. and expansion such as low power TV and alternative sources of funding. As an organization, the CTG is already working together and is looking at models of organizational structure. The structure of the Johnson County Council of Governments may be a good model as it would enable the members to work together and offer opportunities to outlying towns and the county. Hardy referred to the materials provided for more extensive discussion of philosophy, goals, mission statements. etc. Stevens asked if the Coralville City Council has been informed. Hardy said thet Shaffer and Helling have had conversations with Kelly Hayworth. Coralville City Manager, and Diana Paulina is interested in bringing it to the Coralville City Council's attention. The CTG wants to develop a structure which will permit other communities to enter community television running rather than starting from scratch. Stevens noted that many Coralville residents use PA TV and that the CTG may be a vehicle to facilitate cooperation and coordination between Iowa City and Coralville. Helling reported that Coralville has hired the former City Manager of Maquoketa to assist them with their refranchising process. It appears Coralville wants to pursue their own route. Coralville may want to piggyback their refranchising on the work done for Iowa City. Shaffer said that Coralville may be interested in starting their own government access channel end a library channel. _ _..:1:0... ~I/I() .,---,,-- ... ,--.... i ~-~'~ , , i- I ~ " I: II: II " II ,- I:' " " I, I' /' i: , !.' 'i I, 'Ii Ii! \1 , I' 'I II .1 I I! I ,r ;1 I II 11 , I I I , I I I i',J " r'."~"-'- " . " . " , ,'.'.'::,'rl J" 'iI ,f7V:"~" ' '''',' , : l' I...:..... '. . :_- _. ~." / , /.'\ ../ '1 j, -- --.- ..... .---- Broadband Telecommunications Commission September 15, 1993 Page 5 CABLE TV REFRANCHISING/RENEWAL Most issues were addressed previously in the meeting. The deadline for TCI to respond to the RFP is now October 20. RATE REGULATION Stevens expressed a desire to send out a press release informing the community that the City will regulate cable TV rates. Shaffer reported he will be filling out and sending to the FCC the cable programming complaint form which requests the FCC to regulate the extended basic tier. A recent FCC ruling will permit a negative checkoff on bills for a la cart programming and permits any customer service standards above those of the FCC to be added to the subscriber's bills. Shaffer reported that Blough told him that approximately one-third of the subscribers will pay less and two.thirds will pay the same or more. Stevens noted that part of this could be attributed to no longer charging for extra outlets which, in effect. subsidized those subscribers who received fewer services. PUBLIC DISCUSSION None. ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Jeppsen and seconded by Patton to adjourn. Unanimously approved. Adjournment at 6:42 p.m. Respectfully submitted. ' Ibtc9.15,mn :1."1'0 --'-" .--- . , I I: l' " ! i' j: j' j I . i' 1 i I I 1 I j: i ~ , j:! Ii :j Ii I, 'I I' i 'I I ! I l' l' ~. i Ii i.1 !r :A("" !: , Ii: " ;'1 i . Ii :." II " I:i . ~L. ,1, I I II , I I' :1 , ...... --"1--"" ""9\-' ~ -..-'...... - -- -......"- ......-p---........---- -rf'" ... ~~- ...~...',... ..... . , " '. ' i " - -t ' " , , :. f}.;... .. " '{.,i' . :I' f "', .. ,:'..,'..:.:,: """'_ ,...'......r. t <'''';'' n......~...j,......~t ~.''' " t".. ~ , '1 -__._u. _ \('\ ()'O\ :) ,.~""'-:..~""::-: -, . ,. ,- . _~ ..I , ~ ,.....'. 'I . " ,; I! MINUTES IOWA CITY HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 8, 1993 . 6:00 P.M. PLANNING CONFERENCE ROOM - CIVIC CENTER NORTH MEMBERS PRESENT: Kevin Hanick, Kay Irelan, Betty Kelly, Sue Licht, Doug Russell, Jay Semel, Ginalie Swaim MEMBERS ABSENT: STAFF: OTHERS PRESENT: CALL TO ORDER: None Mlklo, Nasby, Schreiber Robert Bums Chairperson Russell called the meeting to order at 6:02 p.m. SECTION 106 REVIEW: PRESS.CITIZEN BUILDING: MikJo stated that because federal funds will be used for the proposed project to convert the Press- CItizen building to an elderly housing complex, Section 106 review Is required. Mlklo said the Commission must first determine whether the Press-Citizen building Is eligible for the National Register of Historic Places; If the Commission finds that the bulidlng Is eligible, then review of the proposed alterations to the building In accordance with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation will be necessary. , MlkJo said, while a survey was not completed, he feels It Is clear that the building would be eligible for Inclusion In the National Register, given the architectural quality of the art deco style building, and the historic Importance of the Press-Citizen building as the local newspaper building. MlkJo said, with regards to the proposed aiteratlons, there are three main aspects to highlight: 1) the proposal to replace the glass blocks on the highly visible front facade of the building with operable windows for ventilation and emergency egress; 2) the proposal to add a vestibule on the west side of the building for handicap access; and 3) the proposal to remove the 1968 addition to the building. Mlklo distributed handouts addressing the applicable standards for this project, noting the majority of them deal with window Insertions. He noted, according to the Secretary of the Interior's standards, the addition would be non-significant. He said, provided the material used for the vestibule Is compatible with the original building, he feels the addition would comply with the standards. , Bob Burns displayed a drawing showing the west building elevation, noting the brick used for the vestibule will match the existing brick on the building. He added the vestibule will also be the same height and use the same coursing as the existing building. Semel Joined the meeting at 6:08 p.m. Burns explained the handicap access was being planned for the west side of the building In order to maintain the current northern facade without a ramp, which would destroy its symmetry and appearance. He also noted plans to restore the lights to shine on the terra colla front and the flagpole In front of the building. ,.".-' &411 . UllHU - LL - =-. .1~. ' , I I, ~ I Iii Ii I, 'I I, 'I :i' I I: fI /: I' Ii, , , L' I ! I' I,i ,I I II I I I j I I I I ,} " /, (1 r ' . - ' , ' " I'!' /Zl ' ' :' :','"",' " , . I, ./ ,', :8." 'T:/). ", " ,''. , ~ .' " .~ .'-- ~_..~- _.~ '--, ' Historic Preservation Commission September 8, 1993 Page 2 Burns said the vestibule would Include an elevator providing access to all floors of the building, Kelly asked If the grade of the sidewalk leading to the proposed vestibule would need to be changed; Bums replied negatively, adding the slope of the existing sidewalk would provide an adequate ramp to the vestibule. He said he Is proposing removing a portion of the 1968 addition because It Is taller and made of concrete blocks, noting removal of the addition would expose the windows In the rear of the building. Mlklo said, regarding the proposed alterations to the north facade, It would be difficult to find that the alterations comply with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards because replacing the glass blocks with operable windows would change the original art deco character of the building. He stated a Memorandum of Agreement between the State Historic Preservation Offices, Mr. Bums and the City might be possible. He said the purpose of the agreement would be to develop a design for replacement windows that would minimize the change from the original design. Burns said he had done a great deal of research on replacement windows. He said he had contacted Judy McClure at the State Historical Society. He said she recommended using steel window frames with a narrow profile. Bums said, because he could find no steel framed windows with a thermal break, the replacement windows chosen are aluminum but also with a low profile. ' He said he feels the finish of the windows chosen Is more appropriate than steel windows because it Is the same color as the finish on the front entrance of the building, adding the vertical and cross mutlns are also the same color. He said the windows will have a true casement and are hung from the side. Kelly asked If the panes would be comparable to the size of the existing blocks of glass; Bums replied the mutins are 1 Inch wide and are the same finish as the frames, adding the panes of glass are clear. In response to a question from Swaim, Bums said It would be necessary to replace the entrance facade windows because there would be one apartment In that area of the building. MlkJo asked If all of the proposed window replacements are needed to comply with the Code regarding ventilation, Bums said all of the outside openings /n the building need to be utilized /n order to achieve the number of apartments proposed. He said he Is committed to providing 18 apartments and does not wish to destroy the overall symmetry of the windows. Swaim asked If the panes proposed are available In frosted glass; Burns replied affirmatively but noted they are quite expensive. He explained the mutins on the proposed replacements are applied to one large pane of glass, noting they are actually commercial, rather than residential, windows. , , , ; I I ! ! I I In response to a question from Hanlck, Bums said narrows blinds would be used to cover the entire Inside opening, Including the windows and the glass blocks. He said only the window Itself could be covered but street tight would filter through the glass blocks Into the bedrooms. In response to a question from Kelly, Bums said some 01 the cement blocks on the front of the building may need to be replaced; if necessary, blocks from the side of the building would be used so as to match the ex/sting blocks In the front. Irelan proposed using frosted glass for the small area above the entrance to mimic the glass blocks; Bums noted clear glass was used In the original design of the ground floor entrance. In response to a question from Hanlck, Mlklo explained even If the building Is not listed with the National Register, If it Is eligible, the alterations must comply with the Secretary of the Inte~or's Standards. Burns said he Intends to list the building If It Is eligible. In response to a question ~~ II IMlIlIllDll " I' 1 I' ( I I , I I I I I ~ Ii ,I Ii If. il 1': I, i< ! ( 1,1 I) II ,I !I Ii ,~ ,i ,,~ -- , " i , , l r ! I I I i '1 - ...--- . ... I , ' ., . -;0- . . I ,.", - - '. , , ' - " 0' I 't --" ,',' I, . ~'I ,1.1 .. 'I " ~, ,,', ' .: ' . r.. ".,'.. . ..:......' .' t, '...,' ''---~_ _ I , Historic Preservation Commission September 8, 1993 Page 3 from Hanlck regarding the Historic Rehabilitation Tax Credit, Bums said the building would not be eligible for the tax credit if the windows are replaced. He sald the window replacements are necessary to provide emergency egress. He said he feels the building would never be eligible for the tax credit as long as it Is used as a residential building. LIcht asked If the windows must be the size proposed to meet egress standards; Burns replied the windows must be at least three feet tall to meet standards. In response to a question from Russell, Bums said, because the windows will be custom maqe, no sample Is available from the manufacturer. Burns sald the Section 106 review must be completed in order to release the federal funds to purchase the building by October 1. He noted all the funding Is In place to complete the project. Russell asked If there are any future plans to expand the building; Burns replied a proposal for 48 additional units has been discussed. He said It Is his Impression that the City Council would support such an addition but the funding Is not currentiy available. He added any addition would not be Incompatible with the current proposal for alterations to the building. Nasby explained that the financing for this project was based on fair market rents as set by HUD In May; since that time, HUD has lowered the fair market rents for the proposed units. He sald the City Is In Ihe process of completing a survey of Ihe rental rates In the downtown area In order 10 file an appeal for an exemption from HUD's currenl rates. , l I I " I, Ii 'I n I a I I,' " w I I , i " I' I, " 1 ~ I! I; f: i II I , I I i \ , :1 q I' I ~ In response 10 a question from Swaim, Bums said the previous owners of the Press-Citizen building will be cleaning up the ink and removing the asbestos from the building. He noted the project also Includes a plan 10 change the leltering over the entrance of Ihe building to read \he 'Citizen Building', If such a change Is acceptable to the Commission; he added the same leltering style would be used. Miklo sald It would be Important 10 use the same style of leltering since It Is a good example of the style for thai time. Swaim said she appreciated the proposal to leave In the word 'Citizen' so Ihalll can continue to tell the story of Ihe building. Kelly moved 10 find Ihat the Press-Cltlzen building Is eligible for Ihe National Reglsler of Hlslorlc Places, beceuse It Is an outstanding example of art deco architectural style. Swaim seconded. The motion carried on a 7.0 vote. Russell moved that the Commission find the handlcep access addition on the west side, removal of the south addition, and the change In the sign to "CItizen Building", using lelterlng of similar size, style, and material as the current sign, complies with the Secretary of the Intertor's Standards for Rehabilitation. The Commission finds the front facade window alteration does not comply with the Secretary of the Interior's standards of Rehabilitation but, given the nature of the adaptive re-use plan, the Commission finds It to be a reasonable alternative to use window Inserts that Include nsrrow aluminum frames, as Indicated In the plan, and a pattern that aligns with the grid pattern of the exlatlng glass blocks. LIcht seconded. The motion carried on a 7.0 vote. Mlklo said he and Nasby would draft a memorandum of agreement to send to the State Historic Preservation Office. Hanlok excused himself from the meting at 6:47 p.m. ! ~~II ...........r ........"... ..... --~~ ~....... \.0& ",-, ....... -- - -- ,.....-......---------~f'"... ........-- ".....--,..---~....-. , { L , .' "I" ' ,,'. : ; , 'vI' "I" 121., (,-I ,"" ," '..:, ".' " " :,~' Ii~,',~ ",.;Tl ~J, ..' ,",:,', Historic Preservation Commission September 8, 1993 Page 4 DISCUSSION OF CLG GRANT PROJECTS: Brown Street Historic District. Irelan said a meeting had been held at the Horrace Mann gym the previous evening for the residents of the Brown Street neighborhood; Information and maps regarding the proposed district had been distributed and Svendsen had requested house plans and old photographs by the end of the month. She saId 15 to 20 persons attended the meeting; Russell noted less than half of the of the owners of homes In the area had attended. Irelan said the group discussed the Importance of Brown Street as a National Register Historic District and Svondsen explained the procedures for becoming a historic district. Russell said Svendsen expects to have completed a draft of the survey by October to be used In establishing Brown Street as a local district. He said the goal Is to complete the public hearings by the Historic Preservation Commission, the Planning and Zoning Commission, and the City Council by the end of 1993. In response to questions from the Commission members, Mlklo explained that If a district Is determined to be eligible at the national level, a ballot is sent to each of the property owners In a proposed historic district; If more than 50 percent object, the district Is considered eligible but Is not listed. Colleae Hili Survev. Kelly reported Nash will be out of town until September 20th, adding Nash had Informed her that the condiUons needed for the photography of the area will not be good until October. Russell said the proposed garage will be a 1 1/2 story wooden building with a foundation to support brick claddlngs that will be added at a later date. He noted the dimensions, height, and location In relation to the lot line comply with the City Code. In response to a qu~stlon from Mlklo, Russell said he Is hoping to find a raised panel door at the Salvage Barn for the entrance to the garage but has not found a suitable solution for the vehicle entrance. Mlklo suggested alternatives for the doors, based on previous projects reviewed by the Commission; Russell thanked Mlklo for the suggestions. Russell said the roof of the garage will be dark green, the walls and door will be red, and the trim will be white. . i ~ II, Ii " I', l!, I,. I' I' it, I I:: I' 'I / I i: I i (: ,I :, II , II I I 'I I I , I I I i II Ii I COURTESY REVIEW - 722 NORTH LUCAS STREET: CONSIDERATION OF THE MINUTES OF THE AUGUST 25, 1993, MEETING: The Commission noted additions and changes to the minutes of the August 25, 1993, meeting. Semel moved to approve the minutes of the August 25,1993, meeting, as amended. Irelan seconded. The motion carried on a 6.0 vote. COMMISSION INFORMATION/DISCUSSION: Russell reported a meeting of the committee planning the 1994 Historic Preservation Week activities was scheduled for September 16 at noon In his office. He said representatives from the Johnson County Historic Preservation Commission, the Johnson County Historical Society, and Friends of Historic Preservation were expected to allend. After some discussion, the Commission agreed to change their regular meeting dates to the second Tuesday of each month at 5:30 p.m. ,I ~~II __.-1.lt.L 11 .JL.HtM'I.!UJIII . I " I ,','1 , , \', ~r ~ ',: /i I"''''~'~'- - '" _, ~..... Il:..-.. -r - ~....,'''''''' - ......... --- ~~~ ~ -. ...~y. I .- .. \ f ;'1 , : 'FI ' 'J ,tj' ,:'!"L ,~~",',"'; ,_~ . Co ' ,- r .. ' , ' / /)- --.---.... ~, Historic Preservation Commission September 8, 1993 Page 5 Mlklo reported the Commission's meeting would be moved to the new conference room In the lobby of the Civic Center as soon as ills completed. He noted the new conference room hes video/audio equipment and Is easier for the public to find. Mlklo said he and Irelan would be attending the National Trust for Historic Preservation Conference In Saint Louis from September 29 to October 2. ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned at 7:23 p.m. Minutes submitted by Nancy Schreiber ppdadmlnlmlns\hpc9.a,mln """ "',;.' ..,.,.. " I I I I , ; , , , [I Ii 'I' Ii I il - ii, Ii . \l'l' !: . 1 " \. :\ 1 , II '~ . 1': i I II '1 I; J I II " I,' ~ . ;. , J , ~4\1 'o\?\ ~ -,.,~ . - ' , ' .-: ". ' f -: -. ,-" . f I '~tj , . ., ' , , , ....~', .(. ., - "~I- -, -". : ',:.' . _ . ',; .,' .... ,:-,. ...._ ~~. ' ~ " " ...<~': .. t :~. MINUTES IOWA CITY HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OCTOBER 12, 1993 5:30 P.M. LOBBY CONFERENCE ROOM. CIVIC CENTER ~-.. ~"""""'..~ !S" -'1 ;-:... "',~ ---'I U .,,'.'" ... <..l 'J~ .4 '.... """"~, / n . _"";.I;':':i~""': . ( r,."' .....J' .....~.~;, '. . " .';'1] MEMBERS PRESENT: Kevin Hanlck, Kay Irelan, Betty Kelly, Sue Licht, Doug Russell, Jay Semel MEMBERS ABSENT: STAFF PRESENT: OTHERS PRESENT: CALL TO ORDER: Glnal!e Swaim Miklo, Rockwell, Schreiber Lesle Greb Chairperson Russell called the meeting to order at 5:37 p.m. SECTION 106 REVIEW OF HOUSING REHABILITATION PROJECTS: Mlklo said, of the 5 properties under consideration, only the house at 813 Ronalds Street appears to be eligible for the National Register as a contributing structure within a potential Northside Historic District. He noted some of the storms and screens currently on the house are wood and some are aluminum; there has been a request to replace the wooden storms with aluminum ones, He noted, In the past, Judy McClure has found aluminum storms acceptable as long as they are an appropriate color and of a flush profile. In response to a question from Russell, Miklo said the rehabilitation project proposal meets the Secretary of the Interior's Standards and Guidelines for Rehabilitation of Historic Structures. Russell moved that the Commission find the structure at 813 Ronalds Street eligible for the NatIonal Register of Historic Places and recommend acceptance with the condlllon that the replacement storms are a historically appropriate color, such as black or dark brown. Hanlck seconded. The motion carried on a 6-0 vote. In response to a question from Hanlck, Miklo said none of the other 4 properties being considered are particularly outstanding In terms of architecture or a historical event or person, nor are they located In neighborhoods which are as a whole of a character eligible for listing in the National Register. The Commission agreed the houses located at 712 Walnut Street, 1902 H Street, 428 FJfth Avenue and 1521 Broadway Street are not eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places. DISCUSSION OF PROPOSED ALTERATIONS OF THE RENO-BERG HOUSE: Rockwell explained on June 9, 1993, the Board of Adjustment approved a special exception to permit a single-family residence on a lot of record subject to conformance with the site plan and elevation submitted on June 9, 1993, showing the driveway on the east side of the property, and Including retention and planting of trees as shown on the site plan and placement of the residence 27 feet from the Davenport Street right-of-way. The site, plan approved included a single-car garage to the rear of the hOlJse. She noted the Board considers a number of factors, Including whether a request Is complimentary with surrounding structures and whether a proposal would be harmful to the neighborhood and therefore no further view Is required. J4fl __ .Ill b.LI.h. , , : . , ~ I,: II 'Ii :1 ;\ :1 ., !j' I' I' r: I I': ' I' , i.' II " " I: I,; II II , i , I I 11 'I " I; r I I I I I , , i I 1 i ! r - - '1-~- -~"""~:-I.......- ------- ....~ ..... - - - Pj~ ~ .... -- -. ...- ... .... . ~ . . I '..' ,. . " , ' " . L-I. . ./". ..u ,,2.r. ' . ", ':,,' .',. z'.. .,~ '..' \7 I '~3P."... .... '. .; Historic Preservation Commission October 12, 1993 Page 2 Rockwell said Lesle Greb has submitted a request to amend the approved special exception, citing drainage concerns and the change In grade from the rear portion of the lot to Davenport Street as major reasons. According to the applicant, the grade changes compel the placement of the Reno.Berg house at an elevation considerably above the level of the Davenport Street frontage, which would allow for a garage to be constructed under the house. Greb has submitted an amended site plan and building design to accommodate a two stall garage under the cottage; the one.car garage and the driveway to the rear of the lot have been eliminated in the revised site plan. Rockwell explained the staff of the Board of Adjustment has requested the Historic Preservation Commission consider the requested amendment In order to provide their expertise and guidance. She noted the Board must consider more factors than just the historical character of the house. Hanlck asked if the Board was empowered to consider historical factors; Rockwell replied historical character considerations were part of their original decision to grant a special exception. Miklo noted a letter from Greb, included in the Commissioners' packet, explaining the reasons for the proposed amendment. Greb said the approved 'site plan does not show the grade of the lot to which the house is to be moved; after the special exception was approved, a survey of the land was completed, showing a substantial grade change on the lot. In response to a question from Russell, Greb said the lot has a slope change of 5 feet In a distance of 125 feet on the east side and a change of 7 feet In 125 feet on the west side. She also noted with the required 27 foot setback, the house must be placed at least 40 feet from the curbllne. She said there are definite drainage concems regarding the lot that were not addressed In the original plan. Greb said she also has safety concems because In the approved plan, the rear entrance to the house Is In wooded, secluded area. Greb stated she had obtained a letter from Meredith Jacobson of the Rape Victim Advocacy Program, which confirms that her concerns regarding safety are valid. Russell noted a copy of that letter was Included In the Commissioners' packets. Russell said the role of the Commission Is to consider the effect of the proposed amendment on the historical character of the house; the Board of Adjustment has the right to decide if Issues, such as drainage and safety concerns, outweigh historic preservation concerns. Greb said If an acceptable plan to move the house onto the lot cannot be designed, the house will be torn down; she realized a garage would not have been built under the home In the 1880's but an unattached garage would also not have been necessary. Greb presented a slide show of the surrounding neighborhood and examples of homes with garages underneath. Irelan asked, If a garage was Included under the home, If It would be possible to design a side Ilntrance; Greb replied that the required excavation and retaining wall for that option would be too expensive. In response to a question from Licht, Mlklo said the required sldeyard setback Is 5 feet. Greb noted the amended site plan she Is proposing requires no excavation. In response to a question from Hanlck, Greb said there Is a screening of trees between this lot and the adjacent house. Licht said the house In question Is a historical cottage; an attached garage added off the side to the back In the same proportions would require no paving or a retaining wall and would not take away from the charm of the cottage's appearance. She also suggested moving the house and garage to a side portion of the lot, if possible, Greb said the location of large trees on the lot would make Licht's proposed placement Impossible. Greb noted a garage to the side of the house would also allow no space to turn around, adding she does not feel It Is safe to back out ~~" 1......:l:><:I --- ... " ~ 1 \, Ii Ii, ., " " , iI, I " l- I I I. i> I, l' , i' 1.1 Ii " 11 i, I r: I, 11 I' I I I I Ii II " .1 !r , ," I -.,..- 'lllf'"fP' - ~"'1 ~ ~.......~:-,~-- - -- "'"QIIJ"--"""'--- "'If . .... --- ... -. - ~.....;=---- r ... .: -:-":'. ".",. ..." ',::, : . .' ".', ."b,I"" ':1,/ .t.J ,Id.. "'. , ,~,,: ,t..:... ,'.. ;;~'.,:, :;~" .;7]), , . . Hlstortc Preservation Commission October 12, 1993 Page 3 of the driveway onto the street. She reiterated her concerns regarding safety when going from her car to her horne In a wooded, secluded area. She added she would also like as much yard as possible preserved for landscaping and gardening. Russell said the Commission's suggestion regarding a garage to the side or the back presupposes the It would be '":tached to the house to alleviate Greb's saiety concerns. He noted such a plan would require the use of no more yard than the approved site plan. He said the Commission Is looking longer term than the existing trees on the lot may last; a house with a foundation Is fairly permanent. Greb said she cannot afford to build a new garage and It would be expensive to attach the existing garage to the house; she feels her money would be better spent on the changes she is proposing. Greb said, with the plan the Commission Is proposing, she would lose space to turn around and also would not meet the City's requirement for off-street parking. Miklo noted the drtveway would satisfy the City's Zoning Ordinance regarding off.street parking. Keliy said the role of the Commission Is to preserve the historical character of the house; the proposal Greb has presented does not preserve that character. Greb said she would like to save the house from demolition; Kelly agreed but said It should be done in a manner that retains the hlstortcal character of the house. Irelan said, with the changes proposed by Greb, she may as well bulid a new home. Greb said she could not afford to build a new home, noting there is already a large addition on the back of the house. Licht said It would be almost as expensive to elevate the house to accommodate a garage underneath as It would be to build a small attached garage and pave a drtveway. She said she realizes the plan approved by the Board of Adjustment Is not a viable option for Greb but said Greb should consider all other options before setting her mind on one alternative. She said an attached garage, as proposed by the Commission, could satisfy all the concerns of Greb and the Commission. Greb said a basement will be dug either way so there would be no additional cost If the garage were placed under the house. Licht said, while cosl may be an Issue for Greb, the - Issue for the Commission Is that the character of the house will be lost If a garage Is placed underneath; as a preservationist, she cannot say Greb's proposal Is a good alternative; adding she believes there are acceptable alternatives that would not greatiy Increase the expense of relocating the house. She said the cottage Is eligible for listing on the National Register and has significance to the City, which Impacts how the Commission chooses to deal with It. Russell said Greb's current proposal would destroy the hlstortc character of the cottage. He recommended Greb explore other alternatives that would better preserve the hlstortcal character of the building. Greb repeated that the alternative proposed by the Commission does not meet the City's requirements for off.street parking; Mlklo reiterated the drtveway would provide the required off- street parking. Greb said, If a car were parked In the drtveway, the garage would be unaccessible. Russell said that would be a minor Inconvenience compared to Changing the facade of the home by placing a garage underneath. Greb said construction of a new garage Is not an option. Irelan suggested Greb compare the costs of the alternatives proposed before making a decision. Greb said she was already aware of the costs and she Is sure she cannot afford a new garage. Russell said he believes Greb may be making Incorrect assumptions about the costs Involved and asked Greb to provide the Commission with cost estimates for the vartous . 02. '" II ."" , , , I I, II' I' I, I I I I I j , , , , ! i t 'I Ii II ~ j , II " :1 1 " f: I,; 1'1 I i ,I II '; , II .i - .-"'1---.... ~-- ~ ..-'........ .-- - -- -~,,_. .' -----~~ .... ...-- ,..-~,. ,T -, . , " " , . ",',' . ,.': . -', "'" I~' , ' , t I " M"'" ' " . ., .', . I- '., ,\ '. ". " ,.I " _, l.,o,;, ' , , ~,',' , , . .' '. :" ~~ '. '~ ' '"~, ' , , .: ' Historic Preservatlon Commission October 12, 1993 Page 4 alternatives; Greb replied she knows the costs would be too high and new construction Is not an option. Greb asked If tearing the house down was preferable to her proposal to any of the Commissioners; Russell replied the Commission would obviously prefer to preserve the home, adding he does not believe the proposals submitted by Greb are the only alternatives available. Hanlck said Greb should at least explore the alternatives presented by the Commission. Greb reiterated her desire for space to turn around In the driveway, noting the lot In question Is located at the top of a hili and safety Is a concern. Russell moved to find that It Is the sense of the Commission that the option presented In Exhibit A would be acceptablej an amendment to Include an attached garage on the northeast comer would also be acceptable but the Commission does not view the options proposed In Exhibit B or C as compatible with the existing historical character of the building and does not find them acceptable. The Commission recommends that concerns regarding cost, safety and drainage be addressed with additional options for an attached garage at the rear or side of the house. Irelan seconded. The motion carried on a 5.0.1 vote. with Hanlck abstalnlna. , , ' I ~ I,. Ii 11' I: li, 'i' I, , II I 1; i,' l.; I , I I.; ! h Ii I' ,/ I I' .I Ii " ~ DISCUSSION OF CLG GRANT PROJECTS: BROWN STREET HISTORIC DISTRICT Mlklo said Svendsen Is hoping to provide a draft nomination to the Commission within the next few weeks; the Commission may wish to schedule a special meeting to review the draft and to set a public hearing for November. Russell agreed. Mlklo said he would contact the Commission members to schedule a meeting as soon as the draft Is received. COLLEGE HILL SURVEY " Kelly reported Nash Is at the point of composing a letter Inviting residents of the entire sUlvey area to an ever.lng meeting. She said a student Intern from the City's Planning Department has been assisting Nash with the photography of the area; Nash Is also planning to prepare a database survey of the neighborhood. Kelly said she had suggested Nash coordinate plot maps for display use at public meetlngs. Russell encouraged the Commission members to attend the meeting If possible, adding he would be willing to make a presentatlon at the meeting. In response to a question from Ru~sell, Mlklo said notlce of the public hearings for the proposed historic district will be sent to all property owners In the area. DISCUSSION OF HISTORIC RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT (HRDPI GRANT: Mlklo reported the City received an HRDP, grant for preparation of a conservation district ordinance, noting the amount received was $2,500 less than was requested. He reminded the Commission that the City Council had Indicated that If the grant application was allocated $4,000 from the City's contingency, funds could be applied to the project, Mlklo said he could canvass the consultants who had presented cost estimates for the project to determine If any of them feel they could complete the project satisfactorily for the $8,000 available. ,! ~411 ~ LI .. i ~ ~ "1 - ......... ~ ".-.' ..... - __ ,..;'1 '. . .' ." , " . - :':;(1"'.1' ,y,h ,,'" ',: ,t:... '., :, ,\. ~,' ~'., , , ' ;' .' .,\ " , Historic Preservation Commission October 12, 1993 Page 5 DISCUSSION OF NATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION CONFERENCE: Irelan and Mlklo presented a summary of the National Trust for Historic Preservation Conference activlUes they recentiy attended In St. Louis. CONSIDERATION OF THE MINUTES OF THE SEPTEMBER 8, 1993. MEETING: The Commission members noted several corrections to the minutes of the September 8, 1993, meeting. LIcht moved to approve the minutes of the September 8, 1993, meeting, as amended. Kelly seconded. The motion carried on a 6-0 vote. COMMISSION INFORMATION: Mlklo distributed copies of the Annual Report of Boards and Commissions for Fiscal Year 1993. Mlklo reported a seminar on preparing applications for HRDP grants was scheduled for December 4th In Wapello. Russell reporied the Historic Preservation Week Committee met on September 16 to discuss the details of next yea~s event. He said the possibility of eliminating jurors was discussed; the committee would be presenting a recommendation regarding jurors and categories to the Commission after the first of the year. Semel said he feels the Jurors are Instructive; Licht said Jurors add Impartiality and provide an additional perspective. Miklo noted one advantage of eliminating Jurors would be that the competition aspect of the program would be eliminated and everyone would receive an award. In response to a question from Hanlck, Mlklo said Judy McClure had found the proposed alter~tlons to the Press Citizen Building acceptable but he Is unsure of the status of the financing for the project. ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned at 7:34 p.m. Minutes submitted by Nancy Schreiber ppdadmlnlmlns\1012HPC,mln ~~l\ 1 ; ; r;' :' I, Iii 1 I I " , if ii, i' ,I I, :i :; I , , i i; 1 i I,' I " I 1 ". I I I,! I . I I , " I I II 1/ 11 " ,i' ;i ., I': ----,.,~ . . , ~"'~'~k=I~;:~:~,' " .' ,:,' .}':"::-: :~,:,. L:..:' ,.,;,:... ~'I ' .' ,7],' -'. " ~ ~< :', ';" ': ,..,'..-_~ ---r-- _-..:-----__ . -. ~" I .- .. - . , ---- . / / . 1 .(. '~~ IJ -~. - '"'- -" MINUTES PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION October 13, 1993 MEMBERS PRESENT: MEMBERS ABSENT: STAFF PRESENT: GUESTS: FORMAL ACTION TAKEN: IOWA RIVER CORRIDOR UPDATE: John Beasley, Bill Brandt, Matt Pacha, John Pelton, Dee Vanderhoef, Mary Weideman Tom Bender, Deb Liddell, John Watson Howell, Kriz, Moran, Trueblood Alejandro Fogel, Jan Hubel Moved bv Brandt. seconded bv Beaslev. to aporove the minutes of the September 8. 1993 meetina as written. unanimous. Moved bv pacha. seconded bv Pelton. to discontinue discussion of the oroiect and to vote whether or not the commission was in favor of the "Incas Road". AYES: Vanderhoef, Weideman. NAYS: Pacha, Pelton. ABSTENTIONS: Beasley, Brandt. The motion failed. Moved bv pacha. seconded bv Pelton. to table discussion of the proiect until further information can be obtained. AYES: Beasley, Vanderhoef, Weideman. NAYS: Pacha, Pel ton. ABSTENTIONS: Brandt. The motion carried. Trueblood indicated the Iowa River corridor Update Study-Trails Standard section should have been on the agenda, but was overlooked. He stated the Trails Commi ttee of the Riverfront and Natural Areas Commission would like the commission's reaction to this plan prior to sUbmitting it to the city Council. Jan Hubel, member of the Riverfront and Natural Areas Commission and Trails Committee member, was present to answer any questions. Weideman polled each member to determine ,whether or not there was a consensus of support. Pelton stated he had no substantial reservation; Vanderhoef stated she strongly supported it. Beasley stated it was a very admirable project and he would endorse it, but stated he had some reservations as to whether the plan would get completed due to some huge obstacles, such as the University of Iowa Hydraulic Plant. Hubel stated the plan has been around for 20 years with no momentum to try to overcome the obstacles, but there was momentum now to do so. Pacha stated he was in favor of the plan, but reiterated the same ~~l~ , , I I , I. I, , I " II , I. , II ! ii' i If /. I " J /l , I Y , n ; ~ I, ,., " !': 'I ': ~ Ii " I: I,: " Ii' I' " i' I I" I' I I I '1 'I l ii , I I i i --~---~ -'.. - . W' ..... ....- - - ~~ . ....,-- -' ...~.. .. r- .., \ ,';,. "'(I' :/1:'[,1:'1:' ,:".,,', , ,.'_~r:,_'~="':'" " -,' ..' ,. ,.... . . , / , , , '1 '" concerns as Beasley. Brandt stated it was a very admirable effort, but was concerned about the cost. He felt the number of people who would use the trail system would be in the minority, and questioned the majority paying for the minority. He stated as far as endorsing the plan if funding would come from the taxpayer's pocketbook he was not for it, but if federal funding, grants or user's fees paid for the trail system he was in favor of it. He added the trail system would be a great thing to have in Iowa city, but added the obstacles would be difficult to overcome. Weideman stated she considered trails as parks in themselves, and felt it was impossible to be opposed to connecting existing trails to others. She stated the commission is to represent all of the constituents, and she felt the people who benefit from recreation services and parks will and do use trails. Weideman stated there was a need for trails and use of city funds was appropriate for this purpose. weideman indicated she was in support of the recommendations made in the plan. Hubel stated she felt more and more people would use the trails once they are built. Weideman stated the consensus of the commission was that they supported the plan, with some concern being expressed as to the source of funding. , i , , !., C ~ I. II' II I' ii II ir I Ii " !o '1': , " " 'J , " " II! I', I,! \1 II I , I I : ;1 ~ "INCAS ROAD" PROPOSAL: Trueblood, stated Alejandro Fogel visited with him after last month's commission meeting and indicated he would prefer to locate the "Incas Roadll on city property, as opposed to University property because he wants it to be a gift to the citizens of Iowa city. Trueblood stated staff met with Fogel in upper city Park to determine a site that would be suitable for this project. The area selected begins at the information sign located at the entrance to lower City Park, follows the ridge over to the iog cabins, ending at the stairway which leads down to the old bear cage (stage area) in lower city Park. The road would be approximatelY 150-200 yards long and 6 feet wide, would provide a natural pedestrian way, and would not reguire a lot of maintenance. Fogel stated the road would consist of a layer of limestone waste and' gravel, with chips of ceramics placed on top of the gravel. Pacha was concerned about weeds growing up through 2 r.i ~4 lOl -. .,........ ..". If . - ._~ -----....- ~""I{"I(I. .-'...... - -- ~.... ..- - -.......----~T~ - ... -- - ~ .. ~ ,r r, \ , . - " . ~t~/" " ('1" /-t ' ,', : ,,': . ',- It&,;;;. , .... , \ ~ ' I, '. ~ \. .' . " --:- '.'. ' , . 1 '. . " '. J . " _~ . ,..' I" . .' " ./ the gravel and it becoming a maintenance problem in two to three years; Fogel stated the limestone would kill the weeds and grass. Beasley asked how long this project would take to build, with Fogel indicating one week. Weideman asked if Fogel was planning on replacing the ceramics chips which might be taken from the site. Fogel stated the road would be a metaphor for what is happening with archaeological sites allover the world that are being destroyed by people. Beasley asked if staff had any concerns. Trueblood questioned whether or not the project would still have the same affect or impression on people after the artifacts are gone; and stated as far as maintenance, concerns are minimal. Fogel stated he would erect a plaque and newsletter rack that would explain the project and its intent. Beasley asked if a path was needed at this site, with Trueblood indicating there was no need for one, but felt it would be used if constructed. Weideman polled each member. Beasley stated he had no problem with it if Fogel wanted to spend a week building a pathway that would serve a function or purpose. Pacha stated he was not in favor of it, in that it may not be wide enough for a walkway and bikers may misuse it. Brandt stated he had no feeling one way or the other. Pel ton questioned whether other groups would want an equal opportuni ty to do something similar. He stated with so many diverse interests in Iowa City, he could see ci ty Park becoming a museum and not a park. He stated he did not like the idea of covering up vegetation. He felt that after the artifacts are gone from the site it would simply become a gravel road and would no longer be the Incas Road, and noted the need for a path in this area is not strong or high. Vanderhoef questioned what the plaque would say. She stated she did not objec~ to this proposal if the intent of this project is well described in the verbiage on the plaque, it serves the purpose of educating others, and as long as the road is functionary. Fogel stated it is a conceptual piece of art to cause people to think and remember their past, ancestors and history. He stated the piece was not a celebration of Incas culture but was about civilization and remembering our past. Pelton stated he felt it was a symbol of 3 ~4l~ -- 1 I 1 I , j ! , , ~ ! , ' '" ;i I.! I III \ Ii \!. I:' 1:1 " , " I." " ' I: :i 1,1 1 I ! " i, :; I,; /1 I I ,\ I' II: I! ,\ " ...... -,..--~ ~-. ~..... ~ ..-r...... --- .... ..,-- - ~.... '" ............. .....~~. : ';"" .- , :" " '.' ., ! , f-I,.I "J r ~'7l " ",:. ."", , , , ' .,., , '. ' , . / . ,-,' " ... . , ';, ,_. t'. ._' ~', ' / " another civilization. Pacha stated he was not 'concerned about the precedence aspect, in that the commission would judge each proposal/request by its merit. Weideman stated she did not have a concern about a floodgate effect. She stated the wording on the plaque needed to state the intention of the project, cherishing mutual history (keep in education historical perspective). She stated she would like to see the 'proposed text of the newsletter and plaque. Pacha questioned whether or not there was sufficient support for this project; he did not want Fogel to put further work into it if the commission would not support it. Moved bv pacha. seconded bv Pelton. to discontinYg discussion of the Droiect and to vote whether or not the commission was in favor' of the "Incas Road". AYES: Vanderhoef, Weideman. NAYS: Pacha, Pelton. ABSTENTIONS: Beasley, Brandt. The motion failed. Brandt stated he had two concerns: 1) Fogel wishes to give a gift to Iowa city, and the commission is debating whether or not to accept it. He stated if in fact Mr. Fogel was donating $25,000 the commission would accept that with open arms, and felt the commission was prostituting itself because it did not want a gift because someone's labor or love is something that is not the commission's. He stated this was 'the reason for his abstention, that it was a gift but he could not agree, taking open space so desperately needed and putting a gravel road on it. 2) He would like the commission to have more input into how they would like the project completed. He felt 500 square yards was a tremendous amount for a trail, and suggested possibly making it 50 square yards. Brandt stated his biggest concern is what would happen to the project area in two years; would it just become a graveled walkway and the city would have to maintain it? Weideman questioned the permanency of the art aspect of the project, in that once the loose ceramic pieces are gone will the plaque cause the average citizen to appreciate it, Fogel stated the original concept is to leave time to do its work, and the road will always be there as a piece of art. Weideman did not have a concern about a possible floodgate affect, but did have a concern about the text of the plaque and 4 d-l\ l do- ,. - . ~ Ii II !I I: I' Ii I ~ h " r: I. 'I I I II n 'I ,i """p' - ...".,. n - ",-.--..p- - ~""'~--I..... - . ..' ..... ...- - - -~r. \ -"', . ,,,,\' r 0 ' , , ' -, cl'" .IA", t., " ./' I .'" " I :': '.t~" .'. '~""': \1'~ ',.:' . , " " FLOOD DAMAGE UPDATE: newsletter. She felt the statement should be from a education historical perspective - cheris'hing mutual history. She stated she would like to see the proposed text of the newsletter and plaque. Weideman asked if the commission was willing to continue to consider it, notinq she and Vanderhoef would like to see Fogel continue work on it. Beasley stated it was up to Mr. Fogel whether or not he wanted to put more effort into the project, knowing there was no guarantee that the project would be approved in the end; if Mr. Fogel was willing to put more work into the project he was willing to listen. Moved bv p~c~a. seconded bv Pelton. to table discussion Q! ~h~ Droiect until further information can be obtained. AYES: Beasley, Vanderhoef, Weideman. NAYS: Pacha, Pel ton. ABSTENTIONS: Brandt. The motion carried. Weideman stated staff would prepare a list of concerns for Mr. Fogel. The commission was provided with a listing of the flood clean up and repair needed to Iowa city parks, and a tentative completion schedule. Trueblood reported the Parks Division will have a crew of six individuals specifically being assigned to flood related tasks. These unemployed individuals have been hired through a 100% reimbursable grant administered through the JTPA program. Trueblood'stated Lyle Drollinger had indicated to Bob Howell that he would not be re-opening the carnival rides in lower city Park; Pelton stated he felt getting this in writing would be appropriate. Trueblood asked for a general feeling about leaving the sand dunes created by the flood along the west side of the river as a natural area, possibly establishing a sand prairie. Brandt questioned the ,possible liability to the city in that people might use it as a beaCh/swimming area, and asked if the city would be liable. Trueblood stated the city's legal department would need to determine it. Weideman indicated other than the liability issue she felt it was a good idea, with Vanderhoef adding she liked the idea of a sand prairie. Pacha stated it would probably be cheaper to leave the sand dunes as a natural area. Pelton' stated establishing it as a natural area would be a historical testimonial to the flood of '93. The 5 ~ 4 I'd.. j 1 I I , ! Ii I I i: J i " ( I , , 1 , I I \ I I . !i i,1 I :i I,' , r I II I,j II I II .f:) ;' I , t , i' II I II 11 I, . " I; \, , I I I. I I' I I, I, ,\ " fr' - .....-- . - -..,-~ -~-- ~ .-, ...... - ..... ... - - - ""'!f'"" .... -- ..~..!....- \ .. I " ' f I . -" - - " . . l'l ' ',I" . t~ ",..I ' 'u,"', , : '. I ,'i:.. " . \ '_ .It : :.~1, .?:... " / '1 FUND RAISING EFFORTS - FLOOD REPAIRS: consensus of the commission was that they agreed with this proposal. Beasley reported the Parks and Recreation Foundation met to discuss fund raising efforts to support flood repairs. The foundation is working with a committee formed by the Mayor to raise funds to repair flood-damaged parks. The committee's goal is to raise $150,000, and will be utilizing the Parks & Recreation Foundation as a depository for donations. He reported a short note asking for donations will be sent out with the city utility bills, and they are planning on obtaining the Chamber of Commerce business list and will be sending a similar letter to area businesses. Trueblood asked for the commission's reaction to placing similar information along with pictures and possibly a detachable envelope in the department's winter brochure. Pelton questioned the need to provide an envelope due to the cost involved. Vanderhoef stated it could be a one page form with the address on the back which could be folded and stapled. The commission as a whole felt this was a good idea. Weideman reported Deb Liddell would not be able to continue to serve as the commission's representative on the Riverfront and Natural Areas Commission, and asked commission members to consider volunteering. She stated this position would be filled at next month's commission meeting; if there was no volunteer she would appoint someone. RIVERFRONT & NATURAL AREAS COMMISSION: BUDGET: Trueblood reported staff is working on next year's budget. With respect to CIP's, he indicated there would only be the annual replacement programs, due to the fact that the Commission had already prioritized projects through the year 2,000 (per city council's request). city Council would like to see a three-year plan on fees; therefore, staff will be reviewing recreation fees and bringing proposed fee increases before the commission at a future meeting. Vanderhoef stated at that time she would like to discuss the SPI programs, most of which are exempt from fees. 6 ~~(~ ---"- --- - i . I ~ I II I Ii , ii, I , I: , , r; ; Ii , h ': ,i I;' " :1 I' :J II t! II II " I I I I. I' I , I I 1 ,\ .),........- , ' " . ! . , :. _ I, . ,. '-:- , .-~ \. '''i,I, ..""/,,.l',' t I "., I , t ,,' . . ", \ ',./ 6: I ~~" , " ~ ',,' , 'I" ',' 4 '. ' : "':'-\,': ',' ..~ ;,-..,' ~ ' '" '1 ,I COMMISSION TIME: Beasley referenced the letter to Council about bicyclists in Hickory Hill Park. pacha indicated he noticed the Sherman Chimney Swift Tower group received a $1,800 State Historical Grant, and asked about the project's status. Trueblood stated the group had withdrawn their proposal to place it in Hickory Hill Park at the time the Bluffwood group was proposing placement of the Bluffwood cottage in the park also. He has 'not heard from them since that time. CHAIR'S REPORT: Weideman stated she attended a FIRST meeting, and was questioned about whether or not the commission would be interested in having a liaison person between the commission and FIRST. Weideman 'indicated to them that if they would like their people to have more input they should send someone to the meetings, or if they want to be represented on the commission to apply for a vacancy. They were feeling they needed more of a voice on the commission. Also told them not to apply if only goal was to get trails passed - scope of commission is much more broad. Weideman reported she and Trueblood met with people who are putting together Art/Cultural Center ("Center Space"). They have gone ahead and created an updated brochure. city Council has asked for feasibility study. At some point they will be approaching the commission for an endorsement, and this matter should be put on a upcoming agenda' for further discussion. DIRECTOR'S REPORT: Trueblood reported on the following: COLLEGE GREEN PARK - The project is nearly completed, with a few repl~cement trees to be planted. project Green going to plan dedication ceremony next spring. SOUTH HICKORY HILL PARK - Bridge project underway - filling in and correcting drainage problems. RYERSON'S WOODS - Staff obtained an extension on the grant as to time the project must be completed by. The lower portion of the trail has been completed and work is being done at this time on the parking lot. 7 ~~l~ . I I I. , I: , I I i , I , I' , , I: I I', :' I' II I: r Ii II ,,, il. I:; I~ i.1 I " I i I" r: I,; Ii I) II I; " I. I I' , I , " I ""I' " <,'I , i I 1 .: r '} : ',\! -:1 . \ I i , ~.-. ~~---~ -'.....,- -, \ , ' - , , . , / I' '_. " " "'t-I ""1" LLl' ~ I' "\ t ' - " , . . . -:' _.';,..,,;....1, 'I'" . . , / /~ ". :~. - , ADJOURNMENT: . "'-"~"-""'~'""""""'''' ._'"......"._1_."...-.. ---, - --.~-- -, ~---- - BICYCLISTS IN HICKORY HILL PARK - A copy of a letter from Amy Kolen concerning bikes on trails - will be talking with police chief and others to see if anything we can do. Signs have not been effective in the past. Moved bv Beasley. seconded bv Brandt. to ad;ourn. Unanimous. The meeting adjourned at 7:25 p.m. I , I ) , J: " :! j: Ii: I ,I I' ,I 'I, I' ,I "., 'Il '1\1:- i ,j' . " Ii' , ,I . I I I ; I r '; \ f: ,:1 r I I,. II & .)~ r'" B 'i: i ;i .'.............-'.. ~~,~. : " '" -----'-;- 'If//f'''' - - i~ ~ ~---...- ~--~..-r:.-...,----- ..........-.. .........---,~.... -... --~~ . '. \ ',' , . f -, ' ,-' -, " . ,t I ,I'. L "/8'" '" ',' \. , " -,. I ',' , : I ,~.' ',,'. .,.:...;' ;....,....' " . ,,":, / // \ , 1 , .~. -- REGULAR MEETING OF BOARD OF TRUSTEES OCTOBER 28, 1993 4100 PM Members Present: Greenleaf, Hargrave, Hobart, Hubbard, Lundquist, Moyers, Singerman, Spencer, Traw Members Absent: Black, Clark, Craig, Eckholt, Eggers, Green, Lubaroff, Spaziani Call meeting to order Staff Present: The meeting was called to order at at 4:08 pm Approval of Minutes Minutes for the following meetings were approved: Special meeting of September 21, 1993. HObart/Moyers Regular meeting of September 23, 1993. Moyers/Singerman Special meeting of October 19, 1993. Traw/Moyers Financial Report Receipts continue in their upward trend and were up 2B% over first quarter of FY93. Sale of fee Cards to university Heights have increased by 25%. The subject of fee cards for University Heights users prompted a discussion suggesting possible future p.egotiations for a service contract. Exoenditures were displayed in a newly formatted report. Year to date and comparison to previous fiscal year were shown. Some discussion on the trend of certain expenses was held. Gifts & Bequests . It was noted that the Board approved $500 for Hospice Road Race, not $300 as was indicated. The sources of income for the undesignated portion of the fund were reviewed Disbursements: Visa expenditures for September were reviewed. Disbursements for September were approved. Moyers/Singerman Staff Reports: 1. Classification study: Eggers described the recent classification study conducted by the City. Periodically, job descriptions become outdated and the City brings in a 1 01413 I I I I. ' i I j ! I : i ! ; I. I' ~ Ii! II !I ii j: ,I 'j. r: I, Ii ii !' , ,I , ': u , I,: II i:: " .,'. il I,: j. :, ! II , ;1 " . . """,... ____ --- "l~_._-~"'~ ..-.'.....- f ., , .. I ',' , cl" , Ie '(" ' ,,: ' ',' ':,:"1"" ,1--,. 7l!','", . ':: .. - !' --' _. .." consultant to re-evaluate the plan. The City is just completing such a process. This is very time consuming; twelve working days were spent by each of two library staff members for both the study and the appeal procedures. Once this phase is completed, it is presented to the union to negotiate the pay scale. When and if a new pay scale is settled on, the City assumes the cost of any higher salaries. Eggers feels this process and traditional classifications and pay plans are damaging to staff morale and run counter to contemporary ideas about how to motivate employees to feel part of a team process and to take responsibility for their jqb. General trends are towards fewer, broader job classifications and pay ranges. This process seems to increase the number of categories. The Library went from six to eleven pay levels for example. 2. Councilwoman Susan Horowitz' letter was responded too and the Board was pleased with the information contained in the response. 3. Orientation for new Council members: It was recommended that the Board prepare an orientation in late November/early December and give new Council members a tour of the library along with a question and answer session. A breakfast meeting with conversation from Board members and then a tour was tentatively scheduled for Tuesday, November 23 at B:OO am. The agenda will consist of updates and highlights by our three committees; Search, Planning and Expansion. 4. Development Office Report: Dates to remember - Sunday November 21, 12:30 to 2:30 pm is the date planned for Books for Giving and Liking. It's a chance to benefit the library and to buy books for holiday gifts. Project Holiday will begin Monday, November 15 and run through the end of December. The Funding the Future campaign is winding down with a goal of meeting the match by December 31. Over one million dollars has been raised. Eckholt laid out plans for continued deferred giving activities once the campaign is concluded. He also reported that over $17,000 has been raised for the Sustaining Fund during the first quarter - up from a year ago - and that overall giving so far in FY94 is at $56,000. 5. 1st Quarter FY94 statistics. Board members always show interest in which numbers went up and which went down and why when reviewing this report. This quarter was no exception. Circulation increased 11% over a year ago; about 180 people entered the building each hour open during the first quarter. It was pointed out that several of the use indicators now used by Information Department - questions answered by FAX, dial-up to COMPASS, users of REFNET and on-line searches . reflect the heavy use of electronic 2 , 014 t 3 ______-- L U. J. - -~ - - , ; i , i I. I II' 1 , , Id I r , 'I lj i: Ii' ': I!' (' " I' II 'I l'i , , Ii " t: I I ~ i I! I, d I I i I 1 I , I I II !I I , r. i , , I. i i I , , , i i ~". ........ -- .......... , , .' ---~------~-------- 'l~- ~--~ ..-'......-- - _..~. ..... - - . . '. , ','" , I _ , _.' -. '. \ . L I '.I' . G, :I I ' ,. , ' , .. ,", I I', , .j r.- ,-...U ." ... ...,.. .' ,1._."... \. .,..' J _ ", _. ,- . ' information. REFNET is used 3 n of the time. Also of interest were the large number of adults served in the various outreach programs. 6. Surveys: Clark asked for volunteers from the Board to assist in the conducting of a telephone survey to use as background data for the long range planning committee. Volunteers must make a three hour time commitment to call about 20 different names, complete the surveys and turn them in to the library. In addition, there is a one-hour training session. Another survey is underway. The Planning Committee is sending a survey form to Board members, staff, volunteers, City Council, Board of Supervisors, City Department heads, School Board, etc. This survey consists of three open-ended questions and will be also used by the committee for the strategic planning process. 7. Inservice Day, December 10. Craig will send a letter with proposed schedule and list of potential workshops to all Board members. , , I' j: i i' ~ I I' II 'I II Ii. 'j, I:; 1\ I, , I:' I L , I , I:i : I I I , ./ I I .!\ J 8. Eggers informed the Board of the recent death of Don Benda who performed with Deanne Wortman and Popo. She described the story hour presented this day by Deanne who skillfully raised the issues of loss and sadness with the children and then retired Popo. A fund will be established in Benda's name. The Board expressed interest in participating in some recognition of his death. A letter will go out from the Board, and as the fund develops, the Board will participate in some way. President's Reportl Greenleaf combined his report on the procedures for hiring an architect with the report from the Facilities Planning Committee. Six architecture firms were selected out of a group of 13 who responded to the committee's Request for Qualifications. Those 6 have been mailed out a Request for Proposal (RFP). Representatives from 5 of the 6 groups toured the library today with Eggers and Greenleaf. After a review of their proposals, all six firms will be interviewed on either December 1 and 2. On behalf of the committee, Greenleaf recommended that Board members attend the interviews in order to be involved in the final decision. A regular Board meeting is scheduled for the 16th of December and the approval of the firm selected will be on the agenda. Announoements from membersl Moyers complimented the staff on the Business display currently in the lobby. Reports from committees and support groupsl 3 I ~4l0 - . "... "'IJIf",.. " 1 ;,.1 , ......-- - -"'l----..,- ~-- ~ ",-'...." ______---""QPI'o ...- --- ~ff .. .............- . ' !, ' ,. t";'l , ' 1- : (-t ,'.', ' ' -' ~_ , " . .I ,t' ~., .' I: . , " I . ' . . . " ~' '1 .' ",,' . . _. I ,_.,~. / /, '\ 1. ... - .. Search Committee: Moyers referred to the documents in the packet that were developed by the COlnmittee: a timeline, the Job ad, the Job Description and list of Critical Skills which were the basis for the other documents. Moyers asked the Board members to reserve time in April for participating in the interviews. Hobart asked that the Board approve the pertinent documents so the committee can proceed. Traw moved that the committee be authorized to place the ad and followup with the job description and essay , questions as presented. Lundquist seconded. The Committee is still developing the questions to send to those applicants who meet minimal qualifications. Planning Committee: The Planning committee is about to hire a consultant and facilitator to help them through the planning. process. He will meet with the staff members of the committee on November 5 to begin planning for the retreat. A two day retreat on January 9 and 10 is is being planned. January 16 and 17 are the alternative dates. A group of about 15 or 20 people will meet and, having received preliminary information about the library, will use a planning model suggested by the consultant and revised by the committee. The next full committee meeting is Tuesday, November 9 at 5:30 pm. All committees were thanked for their efforts and hard work. llY95 Budget: No major changes were made except for revisions to Notes to Form 1, Request for Circulation Coordinator and the notes to Form 2 which was Staff Development. A motion was made by singerma:n and seconded by Traw to approve the budget as proposed. Approve resolution for joint negotiations. The resolution for joint negotiations with City Council for purposes of negotiating wages and new classification system with Local 1B3 of American Federation of State, City and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) was approved. Traw/Singerman Lundquist moved and Moyers seconded the motion to adjourn at 5:5B pm. Submitted by Martha Lubaroff 4 ..I.\IM ,,. \ ~&.( 13 "'-i""'-- ! I, ~ I, II! I' II' II :i - ii, 1;1 " l 1': Ii !: II' " " 1,1 I' " " I' 1,1 il I 1,/ " I I I I ,I 'J ,II il ,..,.,.. .....-". _ -- '1 --- ~ ~~ I i I I I, I , , i ~-- ~ ..-......." ... ~ ........-------..----..1f' ........ ----. ... {':'-""':'.' . ''':''''''';., . :'~.'.'. 't 'I ,"" 5 It, :. .~ ,', ..1 ' , . ~' '. ,- . - . , :' '~'~4'" .', _~,-'_ l'.:(~_:,. " ",','" ,/ MINUTES IOWA CITY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OCTOBER 27. 1993 7:30 P.M. SPECIAL MEETING CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS ru'lID'l r, ij ~ ~!~ ii ~!I :1 H: 1,; n't6C:.4UV~,J~M' 'i,,!: 'I SubJect to APP10Vdf MEMBERS PRESENT: Ann Bovbjerg, Sally Dierks, Jane Jakobsen, Tom Scott, George Starr MEMBERS ABSENT: Pete Cooper, Dick Gibson STAFF PRESENT: Bormann, Davidson. Franklin, Miklo. Moen, Schreiber CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Scott called the meeting to order at 7:46 p.m. ZONING ITEMS: 1. REZ93.00 1 O. Public discussion of an epplication submitted by First Muscetine Proper- ties, Inc. to rezone a 7.86 acre parcel located north of Muscatine Avenue and east of First Avenue from RFBH, Factory Built Housing Residential, to CC-2, Community Commercial. (45.day limitation period waived to October 27, 1993.) . " ~ I' II II; 'i I': 'I: I' Ii I' I: H ii: 1'1 " I! I,! I I , " 1;1 I I , 'I I, t Miklo said the proposed rezoning is of an area currently zoned RFBH and is the site of the Towncrest Mobile Home Court; if the rezoning to CC-2, Community Commercial, is approved, the applicant has indicated that the mobile home court and the adjacent properties already zoned commercial would redevelop as a grocery store with retail shops attached. In their examination of the proposed rezoning, staff found there is some support for redevelopment of this erea in the Comprehensive Plen in that the Plan encourages commercial development to occur in existing cores rather than creating new commercial areas. However, this must be balanced with other concerns identified in the Comprehensive Plan, including the arterial street plen, which identifies an existing capacity constraint at the intersection of Muscatine Avenue and First Av~nue, and also the section of the plan that addresses housing, which designates the RFBH portion of this property as appropriate for housing at a density of 16-24 dwelling units par acre, Miklo noted the applicant has agreed to pay $45,000 to address traffic issues. He said staff has estimated that approximately $97,000 in moving costs would be incurred if the 60 households currently living in Towncrest Mobile Home Court are required to move; this estimate includes the cost of administering a program to assist the tenants with relocation such as the fee cherged by Life Skills to provide programming and assistance in locating units. He noted the applicant has offered to pay the City $25,000 to assist with relocation expenses; It may also be possible to obtain $30,000 in Community Development Block Grant funds, subject to a recommendation by the Committee on Community Needs and approval by the City Council. Miklo listed the conditions staff recommends for epproval of the rezoning request: 1) Access easements across the subject property and adjacent redevelopment site will be granted to owners of the James and Hansen properties to provide access to First and Muscatine avenues, I ,j 02'-114 --.. JL , ',' " ."' I "t"""I' '" ' 'b-~: '>lJ~t', ' '" :., ,'I ' . I ,./', . I' ~ ' "': I' ' ' .' \ , ' -, ,..... '. Planning & Zoning Commission October 27, 1993 Page 2 2) The applicant agreeing to relocate the curb cut and driveway on Muscetine Avenue to align with Wade Street if and when the James property to the west redevelops. 3) Additional right-of-way will be dedicated for First Avenue (7 1/2 feet) and Muscatine Avenue (7 feet). 4) A concept plan. including bUilding elevation drawings and a landscaping plan, shall be approved by the Director of Planning and Community Development prior to site development. The concept plan shall include provisions for land- scape buffers between the proposed development and the eXisting residential development to the north and east of the subject property. 5) A pedestrian access easement or right-of-way shall be established adjacent to Ralston Creek. The location of the pedestrian access area shall be determined at the time of concept plan approval. In response to a question from Starr, Miklo said the estimated $97,000 for moving costs includes expenses such es security depOSits, first month's rent and utility hook- up fees. In response to a question from Bovbjerg. Miklo said CDBG funds must be used to provide essistance to middle and low income households. Starr said because CDBG funds have been used for flood assistance over the past month, he was uncom- fortable assuming the CDBG funds would be available for this project. Miklo said, according to discussions with Marianne Milkman. the Coordinator of the CDBG Pro- gram, there does appear to be ample funding for flood-related relief and programs, and the contingency fund for the larger block grant is not being tapped for those expandi- tures. He added Milkman was confident that this project would be an appropriate use of the contingency fund and would not exhaust that fund. In response to a question from Bovbjerg, Miklo said the Committee on Community Needs could discuss the proposal et their next regular monthly meeting; if an acceptable arrangement is made between the City and the applicant and the gap in terms of the estimated cost for relocation assistance and the funds available is closed. staff sees this as progreSSing to the Council along with the rezoning proposal. I' , I 1:1' I' I,] L( I 11 I 11 II' .~ j i, ~ !' .Ii I 'I " " , I' i" it 11 6) The eXisting storm sewer line located under this property shall be relocated so that it is not in conflict with any proposed structures, An easement shall be established over the relocation line. i,' !; ! I ( I I I I Bovbjerg said she feels uncomfortable with changing land uses which have enormous impact upon people without the City recognizing an obligation to provide some type of relocation assistance. She said she would like time to review the memorandum from City legal staff. Starr agreed he would also like some time to review the memo in more detail and consider the human issues as well as the land use issues. In response to a question from Dierks, Bormann said, according to state law, the present owner of Towncrest Mobile Home Court would be required to give the tenants at least 60 days notice before terminating a lease, adding'the lime frame could be longer depending on the lease agreements with the tenants. Dierks asked if that meant the owner could close the court without providing any relocation assistance to the rasi- dents; Miklo replied that was truo but the property would still be zoned RFBH and could only be used for manufactured housing or sit vacant. ,I ~414 ;.,' ; .' ,,r., ,t .' ( ." ~ . . , . ',,' t-f " ,-- -. M' ;1 l - " ' ", " , _I~... . ".,_I"-,f ~" ~. ',~' .,1 .,1, J~.' _,'., 1\.. I. "" . Planning & Zoning Commission ,October 27, 1993 Page 3 Jakobsen asked if there had been any discussion with the applicant regarding tax abatement: Miklo said the City could explore the possibility of declaring this area an Urban Revitalization zone. which would require a finding by the Council that the aree was blighted or there was a legitimate government reason to encourage its redevelop- ment through tax abatement. He said, in a phone conversation, the applicent had inqujre~ as to whether the City would consider tax abatement: staff has not explored that issue in detail. Bormann said the reason tax abatement was discussed in the context of the memo was because that is the only Code of Iowa provision that permits a city to require relocation assistance. Public discussion opened at 8:00 p.m. Ed Murchv. 13C Towncrest Mobile Home Court, reviewed the results of the survey he had presented at the October 21, 1993 formal meeting and said those statistics identified a definite need for addressing the concerns of the low income tenants of Towncrest Mobile Home Court. He noted 45% of the tenants who participated in the survey had annual incomes below $10,000 and another 25% had incomes below $15,000: relocation would be a great hardship on these persons. He said it will cost him between $600-$800 to relocate his trailer; he had originally hoped to recoup some of those expenses but now is requesting thet any displacement assistance available go to those who need it most. , , j, , I ~ I,' I' II, I! " Ii' 'I ii' " I' I I, I I: , l;' !: " I,: j I, j I II I! f: Murphy said many of the tenants are against the proposed rezoning for obvious reasons end are happy with their current living conditions. He said their mobile homes are the only asset many of the tenants own: if that is taken away. they should be given something in return. He said many people in the Midwest faced economic herdship due to the recent flooding, which was an act of God: he asked that the City not put economic hardship on the tenants of Towncrest Mobile Home Court due to corporate prosperity. Murphy said the City has done an excellent job of listening to the people involved end asking questions and the Commission appears to have a genuine concern for the tenants of the court. Phil Leff. attornev for the aoolicant. said the letter from the president of Eagle Food Stores dated October 15, 1993, summarizes the applicant's response to staff's position. He noted staff and the applicant have exchanged information cooperatively. He said the most important aspect for the applicant is time, which is running out for this proposal. He said the proposal appears to satisfy staff, but with two primary continuing problems (the replacement of affordable housing and poor traffic conditions at the intersection of First and Muscatine avenues): the other aspects of the plan seem to be completely workable and appear reasonable. Leff said he understands the problem with affordable housing and the dilemma the occupants face with relocation. However, the applicant is faced with economic limitations in participating, as staff has suggested, as a partner in solving those problems: there are limits as to what this or any other applicant can do and still have an improvement that is economically feasible. The problem of affordable housing is a City problem, not just the problem of this particular developer; there has always been a problem in Iowa City with affordable housing and in Leff's opinion, that problem will ,\ ~~(4 'lfllJf('r- - "'1----'" - - - ~ ..... ,'''.., '1,," ~"':" (' ',' ",,~" , '<G' f'f ',I',', ',; (cO'" ",a . . "., .~~._lf~~. ;',:, "',: r:r...:,..:.;l, ,,' , , ' Planning & Zoning Commission October 27, 1993 Page 4 persist until the City changes its ordinences to make it economically fee sible for developers to construct affordable housing. Leff said this area is probably going to change in its availability es affordable housing ragardless of what happans to this application; the court is approximately 50 years old and is in need of substantial improvements. He said it is fair to assume the rent will increase substantially once the owner makes the necessary improvements. Leff said the applicant has proposed to pay the City $25,000. whether or not the City has the legal authority to require that payment. Leff said, in regard to the inadequacies of the street right'of-ways and intersection, the developer has agreed to give to the City parcels of land without tha cost of condem- nation to widen those streets where applicable and has also agreed to make a contribu- tion of $45,000 to the cost of widening the intersection when the Council decides that should be done. He said any future traffic counts are educatad guesses and the $45,000 is the economic limit of what the developer can pay. , , I Ii ~ II I!' II I,' ii, I Ii " I I " t I: j'; I " j: I' ., Ii Ii .I Ii II !l I: i' Leff said the question of tax abatement was raised very recently. He said if it is an attractive alternative from the applicant's standpoint, a tax abatement that would allow the developer to recoup their costs in a short period of time by lessening the real estate taxes on the property is a potential solution in theory; however, the time aspect that is involved and the political process of deciding whether abatement is going to be granted simply takes it out of tha realm of any practical concern for this particular developer, unless the Council were to act immediately. Leff asked the Commission to make a recommendation on this application and forward the matter to tha Council; the developer realizes tha Council must still make decisions that are beyond the control of the Commission. Linda Murrev. Vice-Chairoerson, Committee on Communitv Needs, said the committae hed just discussed the Towncrest Mobile Home Court project at their meeting and had passed a motion to recommend to the Council to encourage tha saller and buyer to coma up with significant relocation funds should the rezoning be passed; the motion did not include any recommendation for use of COBG funds for the ralocation costs. Public discussion closed at 8:21 p.m. In response to a question from Scott, Bormann replied she does not know the exact tax abatement figure. She said, under Chapter 404, there are a variety of formulas that the City can make availeble to a developer for tax abatement; Section 404.6 provides that the developer has to pay at least one month's rent and the City may require compensation of actual relocation expenses paid to qualified tenants on dis- placement. It also allows the City to require the developer to pay all or part of the relocation payments as a condition for receiving the tax abatement. Scott asked if the actuel ralocation costs would include just moving cost; Bormann said that is her understanding but she has not researched actual case law on which relocation costs can be included. Scott asked If it would be possible to allow tax abatement just to cover the relocation costs; Bormann replied the City can adopt one of four schedules set out in the Code of Iowa or can provide a range of the four schedules and allow the developer to choose and it likely the abatement would be for more than just the relocation costs. :\ ~l.JI<I --- _..&- h.LJl ... .. ~""~;,.."...- --. ..-- - -,~- ~ -' ,..~ '.... r, \ '.-. . ' /' , ,')-' '- .' f/' ,. t- ''1 . ,', I ,\ ./ , . . 'n ,= "" ,,", ' .', ' " \, """ g- ; ,'" , " . - I", -- ,,-..' ", '., Planning & Zoning Commission October 27. 1993 Page 5 Miklo said there a number of variables involved that are subject to change. including the actual velue of the property if it is redeveloped; based on information provided by the applicant on what they feel the property will be worth if it is improved end using a schedule in which 80% of the taxes are abated the first year and then a declining scale is used over a ten year period. the tax savings the first year to the applicant would be in the range of $35.00-$48,000. In response to a question from Scott, Bormann said enother schedule allows 100% tax abatement for three years; she believes those two options would be the only alternatives available in the current situetion. James Conklin, Towncrest Mobile Home Court. said he is concerned and puziled on the whole redevelopment proposal but he hes nothing against the trailer court being sold. He said he has lived in the court for over 18 years; he purchased a home when he wes able to beceuse he was tired of moving from place to place. He seid he figured this would be his last home and asked where he was to go if he was now uprooted since there is no back-up rezoning for these trailers. He said most courts in Iowa City will not accept the trailers currently in Towncrest Mobile Home Court because of their age; his trailer was built in 1972 and is in good condition but there are no other courts that will accept it and no other courts have openings available even if they would accept his treiler. He noted some of the courts are often flooded and he would not move his trailer to those courts, even if it were possible to do so. He added he depends on his current neighbor for rides to doctor eppointments since SEATS service requires prior reservations, so it would be difficult for him to move out of the city. Starr said he sheres Conklin's concerns; this is a complex issue since the owners of the trailers do not own the land that they sit on and the trailers cannot just be relocat- ed. He said he has heard little disagreement to the proposed redevelopment but there are serious concerns that must be addressed in conjunction with the rezoning of Towncrest Mobile Home Court. : , ~, ii II Ii, I' il I' II ,,- I' I' I I ~ I , II I' " i,; I il " Ii " 'i I I I ,I 1\ ,I II 'I Conklin said the City is dealing with two seperate issues regarding relocation, renters and owners; the renters will have no problem finding alternative housing but what are the owners to do with their trailers. He said if he is forced to relocate, he could not get his money back from his trailer if he had to sell it. He said there is no other place for his trailer to be placed and the prospect of being relocated has put him under a lot of stress. BovbJerg moved to approve REZ93.00 1 0 subject to: 1) Access easements across the subject property and adJecent redevelopment site will be granted to owners of the Jemes and Hansen properties to provide eccess to First and Muscatlne avenues. 2) The applicant agreaing to relocate the curb cut and driveway on Muscatlne Avenue to align with Wade Street If and when the James property to the west redevelops. . . 31 Additional right-of-way will be dedicated for First Avenue (7 1/2 feetl and Muscatlne Avenue 17 feetl. ~tllt.( ,\ -~ - ~.,.,.. .......,.. ....... --"" ----..... ~..... q.,-..-, ....... ~ - -- ~. ....- - ','; "f-I "'.1 ,: 't' /1' ',',',,"";', : I, ! .' ,~ 'I ,I ',. l. _, ',' ,~, \ M " . .,,' Plenning & Zoning Commission October 27, 1993 Page 6 41 A concept plan. Including building elevation drawings and a landscaping plan, shall be approved by the Director of Planning and Community Development prior to slta development. The concept plan shalllncluda provisions for land. scape buffars between the proposed devalopment and the axlstlng residential davelopment to the north and east of tha subject property. 51 A pedestrian access easement or right-of-way shall be established adjacent to Ralston Creek. The location of the pedestrian access area shall be determined at the time of concept plan approval. 61 The existing storm sower line located under this property shall be relocated so that It Is not In conflict with any proposed structures. An easement shall be established over the relocated line. 7) Monies for relocation efforts In the amount of approximately $97,000 will be provided by the applicant. 8) Monies for the traffic corridor Improvement In the amount of approxImately $126, 360 will be provIded by the applicant. Starr seconded. Scott said he is aware there is some reluctance on the part of the Commission to take action tonight because of the memo from the City legal staff and the question of tax abatement and the amount of monies that may be generated by the abatement. He said he feels the applicant ought to be made aware of the conditions being considered in the motion. Starr said he has concerns because the individuals involved have made investments in their homes and if the rezoning is approved, those persons could completely lose that investment. He asked if the $97.000 included any provision to assist in covering any of that investment that could be lost; Miklo replied the $97,000 is a very general estimate and was based on an estimata of first month's rent of a two bedroom apart- ment, security deposits, utility hook-up costs, the expense of moving actuel household goods, a contract with Life Skills to help in finding actual alternative housing, and the costs to the City of administering such a program. Scott said the entire rezoning process is often time-consuming and frustrating to both the developer and the publiCi in the same sense, he rarely apologizes on behalf of the Commission for the time that it takes because he would much rather err on the side of caution when dealing with issues that affect peoples' lives. Scott said there ap- pears to be three issues still requiring resolution: Intersection Corridor Improvements: Scott said Transportation Director Jeff Davidson has provided a figure based upon the costs associated with those improvements and the amount of traffic generated by the addition of this development; the costs range from $63,000 for just the Intersection and northward, to $126, 360 for the entire corridor improvements. The corridor improvements would include the acquisition of rlght.of.way and completion of renovation of First Avenua to Bradford Street. Scott said he has consistel1tly argued that if the development triggers the need for infrastructure improve- ~~14 '" .... - 11\.1. &- " I' I I . ~ Ii ,- 'I :,' I" " 1 ! ~ l' I' I.: II II II .I 'I 'I I, I' II Ii !I I , 1\ ,j -""'lII!!I!!" ~F' -- ---,.-,--... ~-- ~ .,-, ...... ~- -.... '" ,.....----.-....- ~ ... ~ r ~""'-.---- \ ~":'t-I '~I';o -,:tfr-; f'. I':'" ." - " , '.. ~.... 'I ' l" ~./~'''' ~.. : '. ~il ..' ' ': ~,,::,.,--'.,... ,. ,'. .:>~<'.~~:' .~. -:.~- Planning & Zoning Commission October 27, 1993 Page 7 ments, those costs should be borne by that particular development, including sewer, water, streets, and open space. He said while this development may be the strew that breaks the camel's back. if the development is not approved, the City can live with the intersection just as it is. at least for some time. He said the corridor improvements hava been on the Capital Improvement Program (CIPllist but have not been funded or accelerated by the Council. which tends to indicate that the City can live without the improvements and with the pres- ent traffic patterns. Scott 'said he feels the proposed redevelopment would generate significant traffic and if the redevelopment is approved, the Commis. sion is duty bound to make a recommendation to Council that the developer pay the maximum costs that can be demanded and that those improvements to the intersection corridor be moved up in the CIP. Tex Abatement: Scott said it is his understanding that the City is reluctant to grant tax abatements because of the property tax freeze currently imposed by the state. ; I , , , , , ~i ~ I I' Ii [I W 1\ Ii 11, I!- i: ., \ ! I; I;' I' I' ,I " II I!i If Ii II ,\ I , l! , I' I {. f Relocation Costs: Scott said Conklin made a good point when he asked where is the RFBH zoning in the City to replace this court if it is rezoned to CC-2. He said a question that must be addressed is whether it is in the City's best Inter- est to change the land use designation from RFBH to CC-2; that question has not been addressed by the Commission or the developer but has been hinted at by a number of the tenants. He said he feels this request can be decided based on the land use question alone; if he were forced to make a decision tonight, the land use question would prompt' Scott to vote against the proposal until there is RFBH zoning in alternate locations for those persons that would be displaced. Dierks asked if there are other locations in the City that are conducive to RFBH zoning; Miklo said, regardless of whether there are ereas zoned for RFBH, the problem ex. pressed by the tenants is whether other courts will eccept their trailers because of their size and age. He said he feels this problem will be even more difficult to address than Identifying areas that could be rezoned to RFBH, which Is also a difficult task. In response to a question from Dierks, Miklo said restrictions are made on an individual basis by the mobile home court owners. Starr said he would like to see some assurance these individuals' investments in their homes would not be lost. Miklo said, evon if the funds were available to compensate the owners for their investments in their units, arriving et a dollar value would be very difficult. Bovbjerg said she wes uncomfortable voting on this application tonight because of the memo from legal staff and would like more time to look at the tax abatement possibilities; she requested the item be deferred to November 4, 1993. Scott said e deferral would require a waiver of the 4S-day limitation period from the applicant. Leff verbally agreed to grant an extension of the 45-day limitation period to November 4, 1993 and requested expedited action on this applic'etion by the Council, Scott explained a motion to defer tokes precedence over the motion currently on the floor. Bovbjerg moved to defer REZ93.00 1 0 to November 4, 1993. Dierks seconded, ,! ~~'4 .. ..",..,... _ ~"""&'1-----"'~ ._~.... ~ ..-'.......- , ' , I .' .' '.'. ' . ; t-I ',' ,I' 8'" ,::.... ,(~, ,,' ',,' ;,',: \ . I ','. . . ~ ' '. ~ . ' _~ . '.~. " . ... '. , ...'7 Planning & Zoning Commission October 27, 1993 Page 8 Starr said he would support the deferral since this application will affect human lives and he does not feel that an additional week, compared to the year the Commission has spent deliberating wetland issues, is unreasonable. The motion to defer REZ93.001 0 to November 4. 1993 carried on a 5-0 vote. Recessed at 9:01; reconvened at 9: 17 p.m. 2. ANN92-0003, REZ93.0015. Public discussion of an application submitted by Syca- more Farms Company to annex an approximate 420 acre tract of land located south of Highway 6 and the southern corporate limits, and to rezone the parcel from County RS, Suburban Residential, to RS-8, Medium Density Single-Family Residential; RM.12. Low Density Multi-Family Residential; RFBH, Factory Built Housing Residential; RR.1, Rural Residential and ID-RM, Interim Development Multi-Family Residential. (45-day limitation period: waived to October 27, 1993.) 3. Public discussion of amendments to tha Zoning Ordinance, Section 36-58, Off-Street Parking Requirements; Section 36-60, Sign Regulations; and Section 36-9, RFBH, Factory Built Housing Residential Zone, to allow consideration of certain commercial uses as provisional uses in the RFBH Zone. Miklo reviewed the zoning pattern for REZ92-0015, which includes 15 acres of RM.20 in the northern area adjacent to Highway 6, an area of RFBH zoning, an area of RS-8 zoning, the Snyder Creek Bottoms area would be zoned RR-l and would be covered by the conservation easement, an area of ID-RM, and a 10 acre area of RM-12 zoning that is currently zoned multi-family in the county. Staff recommends this area should only be zoned RM-12 if the road providing access to it is brought up to City standards. Miklo said he had provided a list of conditions that heve been discussed throughout the Commission's deliberations; he noted two items have been added to be consistent with the conservation easement. One is the requirement for a 100 foot no-build buffer zone for any jurisdictional wetlands outside the conservation easement. noting this is particulerly important for the ID.RM area; he said the conservation easement also contains a provision that, in the event that any jurisdictional wetlands are disturbed or there is an approval for alteration of those wetlands, those wetlands would be required to be mitigated at a 2-to-l ratio within the conservation easement. The second additional condition deals with the documentation of the current conditions of the Snyder Creek Bottoms, including a delineation of the jurisdictional wetlands, the establishment of the conservation values including hydric soils and other features of the Snyder Creek Bottoms that the City is attempting to preserve, and the location of the existing farming that occurs outside the jurisdictional wetlands, noting the conser- vation easement would allow that farming to occur for a period up to 10 years with a 50 foot buffer between that and any jurisdictional wetlands. He noted Franklin and Davidson were present to discussed the proposed street network for this area, Franklin reviewed how staff arrived at an arterial street alignment for this area es they looked at the larger area when developing growth policies; the factors considerad included; the distance from Highway 6, noting arterial streets will not function as designed if they are too close to each other; connectivity, in this case connecting the Highway 218/Riverside interchange to Highway 6; and what is in tha way. She said putting a street through this area presents some difficulties in terms of the wetlends; C1.414 _ ~JIIIr LI. - -<L i , , I I; I II , I Iii ! " 'I I Pi ,.. " i I P' !: Ii 1\ I'i n f: Ii Ii Ii \, I.; , !'1 I I I , I , ,I I " " , ! , i ,.~ ~ .~ '1 - ,.,~ . , . . . '. (' " - -t ' ,,/,: ,.- ..>' ,tl '.' ,:i' :h, <.. ./',', ", ; ,: .~ ,--- . Planning & Zoning Commission October 27, 1993 Page 9 she also noted an arterial in this area requires crossing the Iowa River. which meanders considerably in this area. Franklin reviewed the three alignments discussed by staff. The first alignment, which was preferred by staff at the time the discussion took place, took advantage of the existing Breese Road. In response to a question from Dierks, Franklin said Breese Road has a chip seal surface from Sycamore Avenue to Sand Road; east of Sycamore Avenue, it has a rock surface and a less complete right-of-way. The second alignment. considered took advantage of Izaak Walto(l League Road and would run through Pleasant Valley Golf Course and along the northern boundary of the sewage treatment pie nt, noting this would provide a natural barrier between the plant and any develop- ment to the north but would requiring running the street through wetlands. She said the third alignment took advantage of Napoleon Road, which is quite a distance from Highway 6; it does have the advantage of having an existing right-of-way of approxi- mately 66 feet from Sand Road to Sioux Avenue; the disadvantage is that the direct- ness of the route is less ideal. Franklin said, after considering the three alignments, staff opted for the first alignment as the most ideal. I, ~ I I' Ii, Ii II 11 I \1, i ~ " Ii I I": i F I " " I I' I I' I: Ii " } ,I 'I 'I Franklin said, as the discussion has evolved about the wetlands, steff has recommend- ed swinging the alignment around the northern boundary of the wetlands. Streets and highways can be constructed through wetlands; it obviously results in disruption to the wetlands and reconstruction would need to occur. She added if it is in the public interest to extend arterial streets, they are often extended, at least in part, at City cost. She said staff's most recent recommendation Is a two lane arterial street, as a condition of this project, running roughly along the line of the first proposed alignment but running north over the wetlands; the distance from Highway 6 for a major portion of this alignment is good, the City has some right-of-way, the meanders in the river are avoided, and there is good connectivity between the interchange and Highway 6 to the east. She said staff is concerned that the right-of-way be reserved at the appropriate time so 'thet the City does not lose this alignment as an option. She said the City has difficulty expanding the capacity of streets and acquiring additional right-of-way once a street is established; if the right-of-wey is not reserved ahead of time, once develop- ment occurs it becomes a battle to expand the capacity, if it is needed. She advised the Commission to make sure they do not cut off an option the City will need in the future; if the arterial function does not occur along the Breese Street and its extension to the east through the subject property, it will have to occur elsewhere and will go through the wetlands or the golf course or will be so far south that It will not function in an arterial capacity. She said traffic will use local streets that are not intended for heavier traffic to get across this area. In response to a question from Scott, Franklin said staff is proposing 34 feet of pavement in a 85 foot right-of-way for the proposed arterial street; staff cannot endorse a street et a different standard. as the Commission had discussed at a previ- ous meeting, Scott asked the reasoning for staff's reluctance to endorse the third alignment proposed: Franklin replied thet because the distance from Highway 6 Is greater and the path from the Highway 218/Riverslde interchange to Highway 6 would not be the most direct route, staff does not feel people would be willing to go that far south and would use local streets instead. Davidson seid the proposed alignment is strictly hypothetical but must connect with the Highway 218/Riverside interchange; engineers would determine the best location ~ ! cQ~( q :flllj.~ ~-- - - "'1('". - - ~-~---~-......-,.......- ----- --. .....---....-~~.... .... - .... _r. ,r ,..., I , , ! ;. '.: cl :,. ',:,-, '"L ',>CI' '" . ";' "" ;' ",' \ :' .'" 1~', ,'. : ".3. ~:J '~'I '.' : . ,- . Planning & Zoning Commission October 27, 1993 Page 1 0 for a river crossing. He concurred with Franklin's comments, adding the conservation easement area will have no development and an arterial street using Napoleon Avenua would be inconvenient and would not be used. In response to a question from Jekobsen. Davidson said the building of a bridge across the river would be a multi. million doller project that would occur after the area is developed and would be stimu- lated by the traffic generated from development in the area. He noted there has been a reluctance on the part of the Council to establish arterial streets once an area has been developed because it will cause disruption; staff feels trying to get the arteriel street established is very appropriate to consider at this point for this development because it will become harder once the proposed development is approved. Franklin noted, although the proposed arteriel would only be two lane at this point, limitations on access would be built into the construction plens. In response to a question from Scott, Franklin said it has not been resolved whether residential development will occur in the area to the east of the Sycamore Farms tract. Scott said the close proximity at the east end oi the proposed alignment and Highway 6 along with the potential for residential development causes him some concerns in terms of the possibility of a commercial strip developing along Highway 6 near residen- tial development. Franklin said the Commission and the Council makes decisions regarding land use issues. Scott said residential and commercial development in close proximity are less likely the farther away from the corporate limits the connection Is made. Scott said he also strongly objects to putting an arterial street through a residential development. Davidson said there is a proper way to place such an arterial; Scott Boulevard is a good example of a successful two lane arterial street that limits access so that traffic goes smoothly and provides an eight foot sidewalk on one side for pedestrian use. Staff envisions such an arterial in this area. In response to a question from Starr, Franklin said the proposed alignment would follow approximately the boundary between different zoning classifications in the area. Starr said it would essentially serve as a buffer between different zoning classifica- tions. Dierks noted it is believed more wetlands exist to the east of the proposed AA.l area and asked how this would affect the proposed alignment. Franklin said any road through this area would likely encounter wetlands; the proposed alignment provides en opportunity to miss most of the wetlands while the other options all traverse some wetlands. She expressed concern that if the Commission rejects the alignment pro- posed by staff, the only option left to the City will require going through some wet. lands. She said the idea is to determine a rough alignment at this point so that this , option is open to the City in the future. Scott said, based on the Public Works Department's unwillingness to view design standards less than those prescribed in the manual regarding the radius of curves, he questioned whether there is enough property between the Butler property and the jurisdictional wetlands in this area to get the radius required. Franklin said staff Is trying to anticipate the property needed so that tis opportunities arise, it can ba acquired. She reiterated the streets in this area will function as arterials whether they are built that way or not. Davidson said what will suffer if an arterial street Is not provldod for will be trees in the right-of.way and 8 foot sidewalks for pedestrians; he advocated the Commission to protect those elements for pedestrians and bicyclists. ~4/4 - - - II. ~ I' I' 1\ Ii: :i I' '.' t I I , 1; I ,. ,': " , ! ': I" : 1'1 Ii " " ii !I 1\ , I: ,\ I ,,~ -- - " . , , . , , . '., . I . .': f..2, ,'" 'b" ,/~-, ;, ' "', :",',:, " '," ~ ,.I "', t. '" ,'. 1,1, ',", . _. "~;"'1' .' . . Planning & Zoning Commission October 27, 1993 Page 11 In response to a question from Bovbjerg, Miklo said the boundary of the conservation easement is along the 670 foot elevation line, adding the proposed dlignment is above that elevation point. Moen noted buffer zones apply only to wetlands outside the conservation easement; the road could be contiguous with the northern boundary of the conservation easement, if environmentally feasible. Miklo noted the conservation easement has a built-in buffer; there ;s approximately 100 feet from the top of the ridge to the bottom where the wetlands occur and the road would be at the top of the ridge. In response to a question from Franklin, Bovbjerg said if the City's only option is to take the road through the wetlands, she would prefer the road be over the wetlands as opposed to plowing up the wetlands. Franklin said if the Commission approves the application without accommodations for BS feet of right-of-way and a two lane erterial, the road will need to go elsewhere through the wetlands or local roads will ba used as arterial streets. In response to a question from Dierks, Franklin said staff envisions collector streets from the AM-20 zone through the AFBH zone feeding into the proposed erterial street and connecting to existing streets to the north. Davidson said the proposed street pattern for this area deviates from standards; staff feels it is appropriate,given the environmental sensitivity of this area, to make a deviation that may result in a less than optimal street system but is an acceptable trade-off to preserve the wetlands. : , I \ " [I I: 'I: 1\ I i) 1': I" " I if I Ii I, 1; I , l; I " I I'i Ii 'I Ii' /I ii , I: f Scott said the City has demanded more and more requirements of the developers in subdivisions. He said the applicant requested allowing rezoning and development in the AM-12 zone and staff objected because it is in the county and perhaps not the proper place to allow additional apartment development. The Commission has insisted upon open space and school site dedication. He said every time there is a desire by the Commission to possibly waive some of the requirements, staff objects; he feels it is vitally important to waive some requirements for this proposal in order to get owner. occupied housing that costs under $50,000. Scott said placement of an arterial street , will require additional street networks in the subdivision, wnich will remove more land from potential development and will raise the,cost of the housing. The developer originally projected the cost of housing in this development to be $35,000 to $50.000; the cost continues to increase because of the City's requirements for subdivisions. He said to get affordable housing, perhaps the City should consider requiring 66 foot rights-of-way and collector status roads for this subdivision. Franklin said she would rather change the standerds on the local streets than on the main arteries. She said she would welcome the Commission's support on reevaluating the standards on local streets and providing some accommodations that would lower the cost, but she could not support lowering the standards for arteriel streets. Scott said he does not feel 34 feet of pavement is needed except at turning lanes and he would like to see 28 feet of pavement used for the rest of the street. Franklin seid she is not sure she agrees with the need for only 28 feet of pavement at non.intersectlons; she has serious concerns about diminishing the standards for arterial streets, Miklo noted the full standard for an arterial is 44 feet of pavement In an 80 foot right-of. way. Franklin said staff provides the Commission their best professional judgment and the Commission or the Council can decide differently if they choose; staff will support whatever decision is made. ~4(~ .. -... ""IIIt",' - ~"'l--- ~-- '& ;'...... ------ ',- ... .'.. . . . r' (, , '- ~ '. -. ~ , t I I " 'I"" [, '1 ' .' " " ' , ~ . I r. , ,'. .'.,.\,' ; C, '. . ' ,. \ ., ; _ ., 'M \ ~. , . Planning & Zoning Commission October 27, 1993 Page 12 Scott said perhaps the Commission should also change their previous decision to allow the road leading to the RM-12 area to be 22 feet wide, and should insteed require 28 feet of pavement without curbs and gutter in the present right-of-way. Public discussion opened at 10:14 p.m. Steohen Briaht. aoolicant, said he thought the idea of a road through this aree was dispensed with a year ago but he is not opposed to the idea and is willing to work with staff. He said he has two engineers working on a preliminary plat and a mitigation plan; thosa plans must now be thrown away. He said he has spent $100,000 to date and staff's proposal now severs the proposed development. He seid the entire area has sensitive soils. Bright said the developer has already agreed to an additionel 70 acres to buffer the known jurisdictional wetlands; staff is now requesting an additional 100 foot buffer. He said he feels the necessary curve to accommodete the proposed road alignment will not work. Ha reiterated he is not opposed to a road through the erea but is upset about the additional significant delay and cost. Bright said the developers view the current 22 feet roadway to the apartments in the proposed AM-12 zone as a driveway; the developers understand the road must be upgraded to City standards when the ID-AM zone is rezoned. He said the developers see no reason to give up their current property right in tha county to develop the proposed AM-12 zone. Bright said ell of the proposed conditions seem out of balanca and suggested perheps the Commission should come to the site when considering the alternatives. He said perhaps the proposed roadway should also be delineated. ' Bright expressed a need to expedite the process in order to stert building next spring; he said the developers need guidance on how to proceed. He said 40 to 60 pads were already lost when the conservation easement was moved to the top of tha ridge and he does not feel that edditionalland can be given up; the placement of a road in this area will result in the developers' losing an additional 40 to 60 pads. Ha said the developers' goal is not to densely pack the homes in the area in order to make the project economically feasible; he noted the requirements are working against the goal of affordable housing. He said the developers are willing to work with staff but it is frustrating and expensive to have the road issue brought up again after the developer believed the issue was resolved. Scott noted various changes requested by legal staff to the draft of the proposed conservation easement included in the CommiSSioners' packets. In response to a question from Scott, Bormann said throughout the process, the applicant has intended to find a third party such as the Natural Heritage Foundation or some other group that has some experience with wetlands and would be able to offer a degree of expertise in restoration and the kinds of activities that would be permitted to occur; any third party identified would have to be egreed to by the City prior to signing the conserva. tion easement. If the developers are unable to locate a third party grantee or if the City and the applicant cannot agree on a third party grantee, the City would become the grantee and various portions of the conservation easement would need to be revised to make an agreement just between the City and the developer. In response to another question from Scott, Bormann said the conservation eesement was written to recognize the applicant's intent to dedicate the conservation easement area to the It. - ! ~ , " I I Ii II I! I' i' II ( I ( I I r !' " Ii I, , Iii I: I, Ii I: I l:J ! I I I II 'I " I' I I ,i ~~N -.....,.- "'lIf'"fP' - .~~ ---.... -.....-- '& "'-'..... ~ "... --~-- ~. '~- ... ---. -... --.~......-, \ ( ; , ,',' 't-I' .I , '1-"'" :1 t .' , ::", : ,:' " ,I, I , ': '. ....:.... ' \ , I I ~ .., ." _ " . Planning & Zoning Commission October 27, 1993 Page 13 City within 10 years; at that time, the Council must determine whether to accept the dedication. She said, if there has been some non.compliance with the terms of the easement, the City is not obligated to accept the dedication in the future; the applicant wanted his intent to dedicate the property known so that it does not come as a surprise in the future. Scott said inclusion of a third party grantee makes the easement more complex. Bormann agreed but said the easement, as written, also offers the option of involving a group who may have more expertise in wetland restoration and perhaps the funds to begin restoration sooner than what the City or developer would be able to do. She noted the City has the same rights as the third party grantee in the proposed draft. Scott said the City does not become a party to any of the responsibilities for the development of the wetlands unless the developer dedicates the property to the City prior to development ur ,he wetlands and the City accepts the dedication; Bormann agreed. She added the thh~ party grantee potentially has the right to start restoration work prior to dedication subject to City approval. In response to a question from Scott, she said, after the grantor ceases farming activities, the third party grantee would have the right to begin enhancement and/or restoration of the property; under the proposed draft, the grantor is not obligated to do any restoration or enhancement activities, unless it is required as part of the mitigation of wetlands outside the ease- ment area. , , I, ~ I Ii Ii: " ii 1': I.. " I ( i Ii I, i; f,; I,: .( I:J Ii I II ,I 'i II } Bright noted a number of proposed chenges that are semantic or clarifying in nature, which he said he would discuss with legal staff. He said the applicant's original language regarding dedication was that if the applicant was in compliance with the conservation easement, they would have the right to dedicate the property and the City had to accept it; Bormann has indicated that it is not possibla to bind future Councils. He said he believes the dedication could be binding over a two year period without binding a future Council if the easement is not signed until after the first of next year. He asked the Commission to consider that proposal. In response to a question from Jakobsen, Bormann said the Parks 'and Recreation Commission makes recommendations to the Council but it is ultimately the Council's decision whether to eccept dedication of property. She said she is unsure if Bright's proposal is possible end would need to do further research to determine if it violates the law. Steve Hendrix. 738 Deerborn Street, said the proposed conservation easement Is an extremely Important document and he feels it is coming very close to protecting a very important environmentally sensitive area. He noted the conservation easement will set a precedent for any future protection of sensitive areas; for that reason, it is critical that the easement be the very best document possible. Hendrix said he is happy about the 50 foot buffer between the jurisdictional wetlands and farming ectivities and he is glad that public access to the trails is being maintained. Hendrix noted the oasement calls for the use of experts in several places; he said the City has discussed plans to form a technical advisory committee to deal with sensitive areas and environmental issues and suggested the Commission incorporate appropriate wording into the easement document to indicate that this committee would be consult- ed, if it is formed. He said the committee will probably have a great deal of expertise in restoration Issues and should be consulted. ~~/4 :i ~ ~~ ~ 1M ~ ..-'811."- .... '.~ -- . ',...._... I . .' . ., '.. , (". . - - . ; , 'CI ' :/", ;1 I, ;4J. ,'. ' . ". ' ~ ~ . ", '..::--' 'I'" '. '.: '~ .' ',~, ':.' . ", " Planning & Zoning Commission October 27, 1993 Page 14 II Hendrix said if the definition of farming as referenced in the document includes typical row cropping practices, such as plowing, use of pesticides and herbicides, and large additions of fertilizers, nitrogen and phosphorous, these types of activities are not preserving and maintaining conservation values of the property. He said continuing row cropping practices would not be consistent with the purpose of the easement, which is defined as "to ensure that the jurisdictional wetlands will be retained forever in their natural, scenic and open condition and to prevent any use of the property that will significantly impair or interfere with its conservation values." Hendrix suggested two elternatives: 1) eliminate row cropferming completely. He said he frankly sees no reason to allow row crop farming to continue, as he doubts if it would economically impact the livelihood of the developers. 2) if row crop farming is allowed to continue, the conservetion easement should specifically indicate that appropriate conservation farming techniques should be utilized. ' , , , i: ~ 1 I,: Ii II: i' lj ,., i' " I Il' I " I' \ I, 1" " r I , I' I I: " I" , ':J i I I ! i I I l) 'I I I Hendrix said great fluctuations of nitrogen and phosphorous are very harmful to wetlands; these are the two main fertilizers used for row cropping. He suggested consulting with experts to determine realistic limitations on the amount that could be applied. . ~. Hendrix seid he appreciates the time and effort of the Commission and staff and the applicant's patience in deliberating this issue; he hopes the remaining outstanding issues can be resolved because he feels there is the need for affordable housing in Iowa City. In response to a question from Scott, Bormann said ferming, as defined in the defini- tions section of the easement, does include row cropping, haying and grazing. Scott agreed moldboard plowing should be prohibited and the definition section should include a requirement for residue coverage. Bright said he had no objections to those proposals, noting he has already received an award for farming conservation practices. Scott said, in reference to Hendrix's suggestion regarding the technical advisory committee, he would prefer not to clutter the easement with verbiage to reference the committee. He said he views the delineation of the conservation values as a responsi- bility of the developers; those values could then be reviewed by the technical advisory committee, if it is formed. Bright noted drainage from 4,000 to 5,000 acres flows onto the wetlands; he said it seems reasonable that the standard imposed on the developer regarding chemicals should also be imposed on any land thet drains into the wetlands. He said the City must consider if they are taking an anti-farming position. Carol Thomoson. 1116 Muscatine Avenue, asked if the proposed amendments to the conservation easement imply no public access if there are no trails; Scott replied one condition for rezoning will include a requirement for the development of a trail system in the conservation easement area but until the trails are developed there will be no requirement for public access. :i '~4/4 _ t!l1 ~ 1IfIIIIf"",.. ..... ~~~- ~""'~flIIt-''''''''----------~-' ....-- - 1~ ~ .... -. JIf~ ...- - ~. I r .-.., \ , " . '., . .' '. . I ;' t-I ,:', ,I , '1-' ':=t ' , ", . . . I , ' " " .' ,.' .' '.', . : ~ : :~ < . ':)~. ~~' ~, : , '1 I. Planning & Zoning Commission October 27, 1993 Page 15 Thompson said she was surprised the conservation values identification has not yet been written. Bormann explained neither Bright nor she felt qualified to draft the conservation values identification section and would be looking to an expert for assistance with that portion of the easement. Richard Rhodes II, 2014 Rochester Avenue. thanked the Commission for their patience and consideration of the various complex issues involved in this application. Rhodes said the proposed arterial alignment may form a nice boundary and provide access but said that it should not curve too far to the south when it travels east of the Snyder Creek Bottoms, if it is to continue to avoid wetlands. Rhodes said he is disturbed by the lack of general public access to tha area; he feels an important component of free monitofing "f the area is unrestricted public access. He said he is pleased with the intent for eventuel public dedication, although he would prefer the land be dediceted immediately. Rhodes said he also feels that as long as the ownership and/or the easement remains in hands other than the City, there must be specific provisions for a periodic forme I assessment,of the conditions of the property under the easement, preferably by experts. Rhodes concluded he is quite pleased with the direction the Commission is taking with the conservation easement, although he would prefer public dedication; he agreed the easement is a precedent-setting document. Public discussion closed at 11 :16 p.m. Dierks moved to defer ANN92-0003 snd REZ92.()0215 and discussion of amendments to the Zoning Ordlnsnce, Section 36-58, Off-Street Parking Requirements; Section 36. 60, Sign Regulations; and Section 36.9, RF8H, Factory Bulit Housing Residential Zone, to sllow consideration of certain commercial uses as provisional uses In the RFBH Zone to November 4, 1993. Jakobsen seconded. The motion carried on a 5.0 vote. Scott said he hopes no one took his comments on his frustration personally; his frustration is in part due to both staff's and the Commission's unwillingness to vary from previous positions taken. 'I ADJOURNMENT: Dierks moved to adjourn at 11 :16 p.m. Starr seconded. The motion carried on a 5'() vote. Ann Bovbjerg. Secretary Minutes submitted by Nancy Schreibor Ip&zl 0.27 ,mint , III~ - 0l~'4 -- , ! , ' 1:1 I , I,' 1\ il! I I' :i ii, " Ii " , Il' !' I'i n I, " i.: " r;" ,I !: ,', \1 1,: " I , I , II II ) , (1 ,\ ~-""""1fff'""" - ~-~-~. -~--- '-e. /ft-! ....... -- - -- ~~ -- - -..~.... , i I i I ) '\:-,; ...-- , , : ',' "t":/',' ,',,:.'.,' " '1-" "tJ ,,','.',' :,": -,,:,' -.( t , - , . .' 'V ' , ,,. : . '-, ' . "',' ',,' ~ " ~,." " " ,. / / "',, ~. , . --..- -'. {:pu, :.d f't Z Rtg-r.rlo.A. .cetLMcil m€ehN~ Oc-r ~7 "(130 'P. m. ~~ta.5e. Si9~ IN: 3. 4. ,", c--- \ ) :-:.> ;.> ,. , " Gi I ! r;+~ ~J..-''J.. ,.~~, 1. ,~)/~JI 8. 9, /0. II. /1. 13. I ! ~ ; " ( ''1. ~...,.."..-... . ...-....~ I ....---".--,-..' \ --..~. -~- P. cia llf.S5: J)~ l",vrlc.'fSt ^\6~r\(t fh"'f 6f. /",2 CA~\bJl..{U' E. \' ~C ~. , o</~ e 5: '2tli~ (J/l .re ""') ), I (Y\ Iy- ,1~Y D""--.~lj'I,, st. ic. \ -111 In MtlSc.Clh~ A~ '2-0( (/ ~~ ~t~ 0<414 ! I , , i . ; ! : I' i . /., I Iii' ! II ,,' I[ - \J ! i ! I ~ i: . W ; ;" .. . I ~. I' 'It - ,r , j-: d Ii" I' I'. " I' I: I 'f; I,j j r I /l. , , I I t' 1 Ii 3 j . . I I, , ' , , " . i d " """"',' ,--- : ~~ : 1; 'Q I ! . I I ,"< _u, '1---.,.- -............ ~ ...-'.........- --. ..- ---~ 'f.... - - - .... -~. ; r .... - \ , ' , , . ' . f:" : c/', ,I' ' ",-" ,:,1i," ,","" :" l '~~'.. 'I .' I,'. ,<_ " ',' \ I:. MINUTES IOWA CITY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION NOVEMBER 4,1993 7:30 P.M. CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS ro~rt'g "~!~i~B~~V ~ u~I~i!.,Uuv~~"JIi'\j~ ~ Sl!bjsct to t!pproval MEMBERS PRESENT: Ann Bovbjerg, Pete Cooper, Sally Dierks, Jane Jakobsen, Tom Scott, George Starr MEMBERS ABSENT: Dick Gibson STAFF PRESENT: Bormann, Denney, Franklin, Miklo, Moen, Rockwell, Schreiber RECOMMENDATIONS TO CITY COUNCIL: 1. Recommend adopt/on, bye 6'() vote, of the .'owa River Corridor Study Update, Trails' as the Planning Document for the Iowa River Corridor Trail. ; i , i: ~ I. I,' III Ii i; II I I[ l' 2. Recommend denial, bye 6'() vote, of REZ93-0010, e request to rezone a 7.B6 ecre parcel located north of Muscatine Avenue and east of First Avenue from RFBH, Factory Built Housing Residential, to CC-2, Community Commerciel. 3. Recommend approval, by a 6-0 vote, of ANN92-0003, a request to annex an approximate 420 acre tract of land located south of Highway 6 and the southern corporete limits. I, [1- I': 4. Recommend approval, by a 6-0 vote, of REZ92-0015, e request to conditionally rezone an approximate 420 acre tract of land from County RS, Suburban Residentiel, to RS-S, ' Medium Density Single-Family Residential; RM-12, Low Density Multi-Family Residential; RFBH, Factory Built Housing Residential; RR-l, Rural Residential and ID- RM, Interim Development Multi-Family Rasidential, subject to: 1'1 , I f I I ,j . J-!! 1. Adequate measures will be taken to protect the .Snyder Creek Bottoms. from any advarse effects from development of adjecent areas. These measures shall ba specified in a mitigation plan to be submittad with a preliminary plat for the area, preparad at the expense of tha applicant, and approved by the City. 2. The mitigation plan shall include a concept plan for a trail or walkway system within the .Snyder Creek Bottoms.. The subdivider shall construct the trail or walkway system when either 50% of the property within the RS-S and RFBH zones are developed or when the ID.RM area is rezoned, whichever occurs first. 3. The preservation of the .Snyder Creek Bottoms. via the establishment of an acceptable conservation easement. 4. A 100 foot no-build buffer zone shall be established around all jurisdictional wetlands identified outside of the conservation easement, except those for which mitigation is approved, as enumerated in the conservation easement, Ii 0).4/4 . ltll ',.; " ---.----.-- ""Jf'Jr' - '" ~----~....- ~ ..-'.......- ,,' J' . " . ' '41 ,.12:'1' . ,1 '" '/~1,':' :I~I" . " : " , ; . r.. , , " ;.~,u ' ': ~ _. -I ,',. ~... . , " Planning & Zoning Commission November 4, 1993 Paga 2 5. The applicant shall inventory and document the jurisdictional wetlands, other conservation values and the location of existing farming activities in the .Snyder Creek Bottoms.. Said inventory and documentation shall be approved by the City. 6. The dedication of adequate open space to the City based upon the formula contained in the neighborhood open space plan. 7. The establishment of a pedestrian access easement over the existing Southeast Interceptor Sanitary Sewer easement or in an alternative location, approved by the City, which connects the trails within the Whispering Meadows Subdivision and the City-owned property to the south of the Sycamore Farms property. 8. A covenant providing for a 16-acre school site, the location of which shall be negotiated with the City and the Iowa City Community School District. , , , , ' 9. The developer paying all costs for infrastructure installation, including oversized costs except for the proposed east-west street. , L I Ii " i ~ II II :1 Ii' '!' " 5. Recommend adoption, by a 6.0 vote, of the conservation easement for the .Snyder Creek Bottoms. on the Sycamore Farms tract, as amended. :1 ( I: , 'I' : !'ii': ..' ( Ii III,! '1 '( [' I I I II Ii '\ 6. Recommend approval, by a 6-0 vote, of amendments to the Zoning Ordinance Sections 36-58, Off-Street Parking Requirements; 36-60, Sign Regulations, and 36-9, RFBH, Factory Built Housing Residential Zone, to ell ow certain commercial uses as provisional uses in the RFBH zone. 7. Recommend approval, by a 6.0 vote, of amendments to Zoning Ordinance Section 36. 58 regarding off-street parking requirements for multi-family residential uses, including: 1. When parking spaces ere located on the ground floor or under a building, they shall be located either within the exterior wells of a building or screened from view from public streets. Features such as masonry walls, earthen berms, or evergreen trees end shrubbery shall be used for screening. 2. Access to individual dwelling units shall be from enclosed lobbies or corridors except at grade level where exterior doorways shall be permitted for townhouse-style units. 3. The tablas displaying the parking requirements of multi.family dwellings, as presented by staff. 8. Recommend approval, by a 6.0 vota, of amendments to the Zoning Ordinance regarding the number of principal buildings permitted on a lot in the RNC-12 zone, as detailed In the ,staff memorandum dated October 27, 1993. I ~4/~ .J! ....... ,0 ~'" .,... - \...-. "'"'-----...- --~.... ~ ..-'....... - --- , , ( ,'C, ,,' _" ,_ \ " - f l ' , , " ; " ", b, 1,.'.1 f./' : 'I, " ,'" ,," ,', .' ' .L ,~~, ". , w' 1"', , '1 I -".'h.._ ._, f':anning & Zoning Commission November 4, 1993 Page 3 9. Recommend approval, by a 5-0-1 vota, of SUB93.0019, the preliminary plat of Mount Prospect Addition, Part VII, a 31 lot, S.72 acra subdivision located east of Sycamore Street and south of Lakeside Drive. I i 10. Recommend approval, by a 6-0 vote, of SUB93-0021, the final plat of Windsor Ridge Subdivision, Parts One & Two, Thres and Four, a 7S-lot, approximata 67.2 acre subdivision located north of American Legion Road and west of Taft Avenue, subject to: 1) Legal papers being approved by the City Attorney's Office prior to Council consideration of the final plat. 2) Construction plans and design calculations being approved by Public Works prior to Council consideration of the final plat. , , , ' 3) A ground cover and I~ndscaping plan showing the location of the walkways and storm water management facility within Outlot B in Parts One & Two and Part Four must receive administrative approval prior to Council consideration of the final plat. I., " \ II; j, " :1 il I! I; Ii 1\ II: I" " I' 4) Prior to City acceptanca of the maintenance responsibilitias for Outlot B, the developer must construct the proposed walkways (trail) to conform with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements. At a minimum, the treil must be constructed at least eight feet in width. The trail must consist of a minimum base of four inches of 3/4-inch loadstone and a minimum topping of thrae inches of 3/S.inch base material (said materials to be compacted). The developer must also provide appropriate ground cover and landscape the parkway according to plans approved by the City. These plans must be submitted to end approved by the City prior to Council consideration of the final plat. If the City deems it is in the public interest to accept dedication of the 22.25 acre parkway, this dedication must not be accepted until (a) the parkway improvements, including the Stormwater detention facilities, arE! complete, and (b) construction has been completed on 90% of the lots abutting the parkway. , 'I".' : " I 1:1 [I II I ", i', ,; I,j II ') , I ,i I" ,l: CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Scott called the meeting to order et 7:40 p.m. PUBLIC DISCUSSION OF ANY ITEM NOT ON THE AGENDA: There was none. PRESENTATION OF SPECIAL RECOGNITION CERTIFICATE: Scott presented former Planning and Zoning Commission member Casey Cook with a Special Recognition Certificate. Cook thanked the Commission for the award. ii c>l4f4 - 14' - "'IIf'"" ---- - ~ "1 ~~ .~.... '4..-'......------ - ....~.,- - - "'ff . ....~~ ....-_. .....- i , . I "" . ,'. .. . I ' _'" - - : " ' ; "L I: ,i " ' ' 'I, r 'fi..!, " '""", ',~' r~..:: '. f : j," ',. ',. ',",. Planning & Zoning Commission November 4, 1993 Page 4 IOWA RIVER CORRIDOR STUDY UPDATE: Public discussion of adoption of the "Iowa River Corridor Study Update, Trails" as the Planning Document for the Iowa River Corridor Trail. Denney said the Riverfront and Natural Areas Commission decided it was time to examine the Iowa River Corridor Study end the trail recommendations included in that plan to determine if they needed updating and to bring the plan back to the forefront. The plan proposes a trail from the Coralville Reservoir south through Johnson County, Coralville and lowe City to Napoleon Perk at the south end of Iowa City. This trail is envisioned to be a multi-use trail for pedestrians and bicycles; it will be designed so that it is accessible to persons with disabilities. Cook has been !)ne of the many champions for this trail and the commission hopes by revising the plan and bringing the trail into the public eye once egain that segments of it will be completed. The Trail Committee felt that it was important to determine the most important trail segments to focus on in the next 5 yeers; priority segments were identified: on the west side of the Iowa River, from the Iowa Memorial Union Bridge ,south across Burlington Street and Benton Street to Highway 6, and east of the river, south of Highway 6 to Napoleon Park. The committee also identified some areas where, either through public improvements or private development, there are opportunities for trail development; those areas include the peninsula area in north Iowa City, First Avenue in Coralville, the area south of Highway 6 on the west side of the river, and the area adjacent to Dubuque Street on the east side of the river. The plan also includes some cost estimates so the implementation can begin to be planned for. It recommends a combination of sources for funding, including city end county funding, private and public sector foundation grants, end the creative use of dedication of property and donation of services. Denney asked that the Commission adopt the plan as a planning document for the river trail and recommend that the City Council do the same. j' l II 'I I' 'I- ,I I II " Ii !I " tj , 11' I H " l' " (: Ii , Ii! I I , 1'\ ! " , I I , 'I " " " ~ Public discussion opened at 7:46 p.m. Deb Liddell. Parks and Recreation Commission/Riverfront and Natural Areas Commission. noted the trail plan calls for three phases; the first phase, the endorsement of the concept, is the only phase currently under consideration; the second phese will be a study of the facilities that will be affected by the trail and the third phase will be the policies. Liddell said the Iowa River Corridor Trail Committee is made up of a coalition of citizen volunteers, which represent the Riverfront and Natural Areas Commission, Friends of the Iowa River Scenic Trail, the communities of Coralville and Iowa City, Johnson County, the Iowa City Parks and Recreetions Commission, and engineers, landscape architects and ecologists, who have donated both their time and their talents to making this a reality. She said the committee realizes there are details to work out, but they do not feel they can go forward until the plan has been endorsed by the various bodies that will affected by the need for planning and financing. Liddell said the plan is to provide a contiguous and safe multi-use trail which will be suitable for pedestrians, bikers, and other users of trails. The foc~s is on the trensportation and c?4/~ - -~ -...,.,,- -.r,,' ----- ._"" ~ 9\-- ~ ..-'...... -- ,..... ..........------ I " ",'" r ,'~"" "'7,'I-t ' " , ~ I' I'" 'I:' ' ',- ' , ' , "', ' ,.:' {"Il"~., ,~'t ", ",'\~~r',~,~, ~"l"-':'"' '" " . ","' Planning & Zoning Commission November 4, 1993 Paga 5 recreational needs of the communities; it utilizes the Neighborhood Open Space Plan and is designed to bring people to parks by creating a safe corridor to get to the parks. Larrv Wilson, Chairoerson of the Riverfront and Natural Areas Commission, commended Liddell . and the committee for its herd work on a well.done update. He said the Iowa River Corridor Trail will provide the backbone connection for the Neighborhood Open Space and Trails system; it will provide a greenway connection between the open space in neighborhoods and the green countryside outside the city. It will connect Iowa City and Coralville with tha county. The updated plan is in the best interest of all residents of lowe City. The Riverfront and Natural Areas Commission urges the Planning and Zoning Commission to recommend adoption of the update plan. Public discussion closed at 7:49 p.m. : , i, Ii :' " i' II ,I' I I' it I' ,1, Ii I; , !, II I' , ( " I,: I, II I I I II ,I ! Cooper movad to adopt the .'owe River Corridor Study Update, Trails. as the Planning Document for the lowe River Corridor Trail and racommend to the City Council that they likewise adopt tha .'owa River Corridor Study Update, Trails.. Dierks seconded. Dierks said the update represents a lot of hard work and she is looking forward to seeing the treil system get underway. Bovbjerg said this a good example of long.range planning and she will support it. Scott said the Plsnning and Zoning Commission would continue to pursue development of trails and trail systems in subdivisions as those subdivisions come before the Commission. Dierks noted the audio/visual presentation made to the Commission at the November 1, 1993, informal meeting was excellent. She hoped the general public would have an opportunity to view the presentation. Liddell seid the committee plans to use the slideshow as a vehicle to muster more support once the plan has suitable endorsement. The motion carried on a 6-0 vota. ZONING ITEMS: 1. REZ93.0010. Public discussion of an application submitted by First Muscatine Properties, Inc. to rezone a 7.86 acre parcel located north of Muscatine Avenue and east of First Avenue from RFBH, Factory Built Housing Residential, to CC-2, Community Commercial. (45.day limitation period weived to November 4, 1993) Mlklo noted staff had distributed a letter from the applicant dated November 3, 1993; staff has nothing further to add regarding the application. Public dlscusslon opened at 7:52 p.m. Phil Leff. attornev for the aoolicant. said the November 3, 1993, letter was an attempt to respond to the motion made by the Commission at the October 27, 1993, special meeting. He said it appears to him that, except for two issues, this is a non. controvarsial application. The proposed plen for the'rezoning fits very well the City's master plan: it provides for some contributions to the intersection improvements; it will improve the flooding situation in the Ralston Creek area by the proposed weter J414 ..~ - LL - ""If" , - -~ "'"'-~- --~....... ..-'.......- .... ~ ... - - - - '~-- - - ... --. ,r ..... ~ .', " . , :'; , :, cl' ',I", LJ '{::-I, ' ,'. ","'.J._ I r~-:...~ ,_~ . I,' ~'1t., J~ ' , _~/ '.' .'. Planning & Zoning Commission November 4, 1993 Page 6 detention system; it fits well within the desire to have some neighborhood convenience areas to reduce vehicular traffic; it is a service that is needed in this particular area; and it will increase the City's tax base and provide additional employment. Leff said the two outstanding issues remaining deal with those areas that the City has been uneble to provide the solutions for itself; the City has been unable to meet affordable housing and has been unable to improve the street intersection adjacent to this property in its Capitol Improvements Program. The real issue is whether an otherwise desirable community development should be denied beceuse of these two problems and just how much the City can expect a developer to contribute financielly to the solution of the problems. The fact thet Eagle Food Store cannot provide the financial solution to these problems should not be construed as a lack of concern over affordeble housing end replacement of the low-cost housing that now exists to tenants of the Towncrest Mobile Home Court. It is simply a matter of pure economic reality; there is limit to the expenses any developer can incur before a project no longer becomes financielly feasible. The applicant has made a proposal as to what they are willing to contribute and hopes the City will be able to provide the solutions beyond that. Left said the November 3, 1993, letter from Eagle Food Stores provides a discussion of the possibility of utilizing one source of funding where, in effect, the applicant advances the funds end ultimetely receives back the reimbursement by way of tax abatement. If the City hes an interest in that, it does offer a potential vehicle for helping to solve the affordable housing problem and the street intersection improvement. He noted the legal opinion of City staff was that the City may only require relocation assistance from the developer by declaring this an Urban Revitalization program and tying any required contribution from the developer to a tax abatement process; the developer has tried to anelyze that option, using the present value of the proposed tax abatement ($110,0001. He said this option would also necessitate the City utilizing $30,000 in Community Development Block Grants that was mentioned at the October 27, 1993, special meeting; the City would elso need to scale back the amount they ere asking the developer to pay for the intersection improvement by approximately $13,000. He said he does not feel this an unreasonable request since the developer's pro rata share for the improvement is based on an educated guess as to how much traffic the proposed development would contribute. Leff said Eagle Food Stores is uncomfortable being portrayed in the newspapers as pitted against the tenants of the mobile home court; the fact that the area involves affordable housing is not within Eagle's control. The developer has offered a financial contribution that is as realistic and practical as possible without abandoning the project. If it is not acceptable or some other innovative procedure that is accepteble cannot be found, the developer will simply have to look for some other community with a more financially feasible area in which to locate and they would reluctantly be prepared to do. so. The developer hopes they heve demonstrated their willingness to consider any kind of acceptable procedure to the City to allow these tenants to have affordable housing and to allow funds to be set aside until the City decides its Capitol ~4(4 - .III" J'" l .... -. !, 1 1 I 'I II: !l 1;' n , I: Ii " I ii' I r I " I: I; , Iii (- 1,1 I:: I, il ,; II If II Ii \1 jf 1\ i1 ,II ....,.,,-~'" ___ .-"1-~ ~--~ -'... -- - -- """QIII'....---..---- --...,~... . ..' ...~~~--; I f ",:' ~ ." - 'I 't" ',--",' , 'L f" ,I'" I :LI . ":I ,:' ','. ,',', ,:,.,J.'~ .~" .,;[, ~"'_~;"''-~~'' ',.' " Planning & Zoning Commission November 4, 1993 Page 7 Improvements Program will include the improvements of the intersection; the developer has already agreed to donate necessary right.of-way so condemnation costs would not ba necessary to widen the streets on the portions of the property abutting the proposed development. Leff said, regardless of whether this project is approved, the City must address affordable housing for the tenants in the near future; the housing is currently affordable because it is in an old mobile home court that is beginning to weer out and the tenants will have to find replacement housing eventually. It is unrealistic to say that the solution is to find another area in the City to rezone RFBI:I because the tenants cannot move into those courts for e number of reasons. Affordable housing is a problem that existed before this application: any developer cannot be the major funding source for long.range City problems. Leff said the applicant asks that the Commission make a decision tonight and forwerd this application to the City Council. , I Rex Merrifield, Towncrest Mobile Home Court, said he feels the rezoning should not be approved for the following reasons: it would create a traffic and safety hezard to children in the daycare center in the area; it would cause more pollution and further erode the ozone layer; it is a low-income area and many residents cannot afford to relocate: residents with pets could not find replacement housing that accepts those pets; the proposed development is unnecessary and it would be anti-environmental to remove all or part of the existing trees in the area; and there are already a number of supermarkets within 1 to 2 miles of the proposed site. ~ Ii ;1 I'. l- I, " I,' /I I: I'i i 1'1 ,; I., " II Ii! 'I Ii, Ii II \1 ,I I II II li 1 I 'I Ed Murohv. Towncrest Mobile Home Court. said tonight the Commission will pass judgment as to what they feel is the best use of the land at this time; he is confident the Commission will consider the concerns of income, relocation, and loss of assets when making their decision. He seid he is neither anti.development or anti-progress but the City must decide what cost should be put on development. He noted a recent Des Moines Register article listed Iowa City as the most concentrated retail grocery market in the nation. He said the City must decide if they are serious about solving affordable housing problems and be careful not to send conflicting messages to developers. Dennis Sloan. Towncrest Mobile Home Court, said if Eagles were purchasing an area with existing structures, they would have to buy those structures in addition to the land. He feels the tenants of Towncrest Mobile Home Court should be reimbursed for moving their trailers or for those trailers if they cannot be moved. Slmv Naeuieso. Towncrest Mobile Home Court. thanked the Commission for the opportunity to express his opinion and said he sees both sides of the argument, He said, as a student, he cannot afford to move and the City should provide a place for the tenants to move their trailers. He said he cannot afford the cost of renting an apartment because of his limited income from a part-time job. In response to a question from Scott, Leff said the Commission's previous motion asked for a total of $223,000 to be contributed by the developer: the November 3, .\ ~~'4 ..-".. - ~~~~ --~.....~ ,,-'-''V''--.--.. --<;M'--...... ----~.,f'.... ... --- . , . D I '. '. (" ,-' , - -, " -. '. , ", ~" f>, ,I,'.', f..:f, i~~" " , ',' ': 'L ...' 'J......;.. '.,.....':., " " , Planning & Zoning Commission November 4, 1993 Page 8 1993, letter proposes the developer pay $70,000, $30,000 of CDBG funds be used, a tax abatement with a present value of $110,000 be grented, end the City excuse the remaining $13,000 requested. This would provide e total of $213.000 to eddress the traffic and housing concerns. The goal is that the tex abatement, reduced to present value, would reimburse the developer for those expenses paid above what the they had proposed to contribute. Rockne Brosman. Oekridae ProDertv Ltd., said the developer's basic proposal did not change significantly; the letter is in an attempt to come up with the $223,000 requested by the Commission. He said the immediate amount needed is the $97,000 in relocation costs; that would be made available immediately upon a favorable rezoning. He is asking the City to contribute $30,000 of CDBG funds and the developer would contribute $67,000. He is also asking he Commission to grant some relief on the proposed intersection improvement fee; those funds would be made available at a leter date. Public discussion closad et 8:26 p,m. : , . II, ~ II " 'I , " !;' " W I /., II 1'1 r, " I.: ( 1,1 !; ;\ I:! II . I ) I ,I :1 II f! I I Sterr esked the City's options es far as reimbursement for lost investments to the tenants if their treilers cannot be moved; Bormann replied any renge of options are available to the City as long as the City is willing to provide the funding. Starr asked if a condition to the rezoning could be edded to specify the available relocation funding could be used to reimburse the tenants for lost investments; Bormann said that condition could be recommended to the Council but the Council ultimately decides how the funds will be spent. Scott repeated the motion on the floor from the October 29, 1993, special meeting that was deferred to November 4, 1993: BovbJerg moved to approve REZ93.Q010 subject to: 1 I, Access easements across the subject property and adjacent redevelopment site will be granted to owners of the James and Hansen properties to provide access to First and Muscatine avenues. 21 Tha applicant agreeing to relocate the curb cut and driveway on Muscatine Avenue to align with Wade Street If and when the James property to the west redevelops. 31 Additional right-of-way will be dedicated for First Avenue (7 1/2 feetl and Muscatine Avenue (7 feetl. 41 A concept plan, Including building elevation drawings and a landscaping plan, shall be approved by tha Director of Planning and Community Development prior to site development, The concept plan shall Include provisions for landacape buffers between the proposed' development and the existing residential development to the north and east of the subject property. i .' ,,~-. ~4'4 "''''''''''''''IIf'fI' ~ ~-----~ ----...- -- - ......-...----....----.......- -Jfwi:", . ~.... \4 ;'...... - \~ ,...-'lIP"_. ..... -. -~.......--.---- \ /. ". .I' ,', r .' cl I 'lJ' ,;J, . .'" ,,', i /, ,: ,',: I,. .....'.. ~.,'3 I"~.J" ' . " ,I -+_..... -- ~ Planning & Zoning Commission November 4, 1993 pege 9 51 A pedestrian access easement of right-of.way shall be established adjacent to Ralston Creek. The location of the pedestrian accoss area shall be determined at the time of concept plan epprovel. 6) The ex/sting storm sewer line located under this property shall be relocated so that It Is not In connlct with any proposed structures. An eesement shall be estebllshed over tha relocation line. 71 Monies for relocation efforts In the amount of approximately $97,000 will be provided by the applicant. Starr seconded. ; i , , ;,' I " 1 II' Ii I' Ii ii, , " !' 11' II /'!' I' " I" I! " I I i I 'I , I I I I I Ii " ': " 8) Monies for the traffic corridor Improvement In the amount of approximately $126. 360 will ba provldad by the applicant. Dierks moved to amend the main motion by: 1) striking condition #7 and replacing with "Recommend to the City Council that they establish an Urban Revitalization Area for this affected property and that they grant tax abatement If sought by the developer. Sold monies generated by the tax abatement will be voluntarily dedicated by the developer to cover relocation costs not to exceed $67,000 (sold monies to be made avellable after the rezoning process Is complete) and to cover costs of the upgrade of First and Muscatine avenues Intersection. not to excead $117.000 (said monies to be modo available at the time the reconstruction occursl. . 21 striking condition #8 and replacing with 'Recommend to the City Council that $30.000 be allocated to relocation costs; sold monies to come from the Community Development 810ck Grent funds. . 31 add a 9th condition that reads 'Recommend to City Council that the Improvements to the First and Muscatine avenues Intersection be moved up In the CIP to fiscal year 1994.95.' BovbJerg seconded. Bovbjerg said she was uncomfortable voting on this application tcnight after all of the new information that has been provided at tonight's meeting. Cooper egreed. adding he feels the tenants should be reimbursed for their investment in their homes if they cannot be moved. In response to a question from Scott, Miklo said the Commission may wish to leave some latitude by simply setting up the funds available for a ralocatlon program so there Is some flexibility in their use. Starr said some issues heve been raised at tonight's meeting that he would like to consider further before voting. Cooper said he Is opposad to rezoning this area when there Is not alternative RFBH zoning available for these tenants. Scott said the I ,I ...._....... ~41L/ fIIU ..lLJ ..LI - ...,""" - ,.". ~'1----....~ --~.....~ -'... - . ..' _tr ~~...__ -- . . ~ , :. ,. ' (, ' ' ' ' , ' , : ,. ,n .'" . ,LI, ,Li ' . , . ;. . '. '~-- l' " ._,', ""', ",r.zr: '"tll,,' .,' . ~... Planning & Zoning Commission November 4, 1993 Page 10 Commission may wish to recommend that additional CDBG funding be used for the purchase of equity to those who own their trailers; under the Urban Revitalization Area regulations, he does not believe the purchasa of equity relieves the developer or the City from providing other relocation costs. Bormann said the Urban Revitalizetion section requires first month's rent end the City may, at its option, require other relocation costs; if the City opts to do more, it is certainly within the City power to do so if the funding is, available. Starr said he agrees it is not the land owner's or the developer's responsibility to teke on a community issue and he feels the community should be involvad in the process; reimbursement for equity gives individuals the option to decide how they choose to live. Starr moved to amend the proposed amendment to the main motion by chsnging condition #8 to read 'Recommand to City Council that $30,000 or more be allocated to (a) the relocation costs, as Identified by staff, and/or (b) the purchase of the equity or value of the owner-occupled units. Said monies to come from the COSO funds.' Cooper seconded. The motion carried on a 6-0 vote. :h~ ~~:on to amend the main motion bv strlklna conditions #7 and #8 and reolaclna I h new conditions #7. #8 and #9 carried on a 6-0 vote. Scott called for discussion on the main motion, es amended. Starr said several of his concerns have been discussed; his focus was on the affordable housing issue. His major concern was that an investment is not lost and that the community as a whole is participating in the affordable housing issue; he now feels confident enough with some of the issues to vote in favor of the proposed rezoni~g. Bovbjerg said she believes the project would provide benefits to the City and egreed this application did not cause the intersection and affordable housing problems in this area. She sees this as a rezoning of a residential area into a commercial area and a rezoning out of existence of a residential area for which there is no replacement; because of that. she would not vote in favor of the application. She expressed appreciation to the residents of the neighborhood for their input. Cooper said he experienced a great deal of difficulty in obtaining housing when he first came to Iowa City in 1945 because of the color of his skin; he cannot see taking low cost housing away from people. He said he would vote egeinst the application. Dierks said. while the project appears to be an excellent proposal in an area that could use another grocery store, she feels there are too many unresolved issues and she would vote egainst the application. Jakobsen said this application has to be looked as a zoning question; the question is whether there are other places that the current tenants could live, In her opinion, there Is not at this time and she could not vote In faver o( the application. Scott .alii the land use question should be viewed first because it tends to ba less emotional and volatile then the rezoning question. He cennot answer the question of ~414 " , , I ~, I:' Ii II I, !I, I, Il' I.' I: I I: " i ( I,i Ii II II q i I l ;' I 1 \ I , ,I , I' I " t , ~ ~""IIIIIr""f/('''' ~ -- "1 .--,. 9\-- ~ .,-, -".. ......~ ....,---.--- "'f' ... --...... --- .,..----- -'............... - ,~.....~------.-- (, ',''- "':','" '-, ' 'I' ' ',' ',' , 'PI ,>',"U, " ;1,,', _' ""'- ' .~", Planning & Zoning Commission November 4, 1993 Page 11 whether there is an overriding public need to rezone to create additional commercial land in this area affirmatively; likewise, thera is significant opposition to rezoning any additional land within the corporate limits to RFBH. Scott said there is almost a conflict between the goels that the City has: on one hand, the need for additional land zoned for low or moderate income housing, the need for additional multi-family zoning and the need for building requirement changes to provide more affordable housing in Iowa City have been stressed: on the other hand, staff has referred to this area as a blighted area that could be identified as an area for redevelopment. The Commission and staff have struggled with the issue of affordeble housing: he egreas with the Commission's feeling that this is land use question and he intends to vote against the proposal. In the same sense, he commended the epplicant for his attempt to resolve the concerns identified by staff and the Commission. Starr said his enthusiasm for an issue he felt very strongly about (the ability for an owner to recoup his investment) may have temporarily blinded his sight. He read from notes he had prepared prior to the meeting: 'The question I have to ask myself as I ponder this issue is 'Is there a compeliing need in this community to provide additional commercial zones by sacrificing affordable RFBH zones?' While the requested commercial zone benefits a potentially greater number of citizens through convenience, employment, reduced travel time and increased shopping options, I would be hard pressed to believe thet these potential benefits outweigh the need for affordable housing options in this community. The existing RFBH zone provides such options and until such time as alternatives can be presented for the replacement of such affordeble housing options when rezoning requests eliminate them, I cannot support those rezoning requests. Having participated on both the Affordable Housing Task Force, which developed a comprehensive housing affordability strategy, and the Iowa City Committee on Community Needs, I believe that options do exist to improve the conditions in the existing zone and I also believe that this is a community issue, not solely a property owner or a potential developer issue. The community as a whole must participate in this affordable housing issue and realize the long-term benefits of such housing through diversity, education, and continuing education, an available work force, and the potential impact on the future tex base. This Commission will be struggling with another affordable housing issue tonight, as it has been struggling with that Issue for 14 months. The question is 'To whet degree does this community allow regulations to increase the cost of housing?' One charge this Commission and planning staff face this year is an analysis of how City regulations affect affordable housing. Keeping ali of these issues in mind, I will not be supporting this rezoning request.' He said he would be back tracking on his earlier comments; listening to the other Commissioners made him realize that he must look at the greater pictu're, not just the one issue he wes excited about finally getting resolution to. He reiterated he would not vote in favor of the application. Scott said the message the Commission would like to send to the City Council is that not only do they feel that the RFBH zone should be retained but the Commission would support the rehabilitation and expansion of the presently zoned RFBH lands, if that is possible. ~414 .. - ... " ~ ' I. I i , L i I I , , i , I , , , , : ili I , , I: I J " ,i W '" Ii' I " /, Il I' , " I, " (: , I 1'1 I I II ,I n I: ,', '" ."..." r ......-.....--"'C1 ---.. - ~ -- ~ ;'..... ---~ -..---- -........ ~, :: -' , " . ',' , t" ,:-' L-I '.1," ,jj'tJ"'f ,".' ,,', ':'- ' :,' ' 1 ~ . ,':f" '. ,I ,I ,f7t . 11 " ~ :. . ' : . _..' -. '...~. , ' / '1 Planning & Zoning Commission November 4, 1993 Pege 12 The main motion. 89 arn~~~ wes defeated on a 0-6 \lote. Bovbjerg moved to recommend to Council thet REZ93.()010 be denied. Cooper seconded. The motion carried on e 6'() vote. In response to a question from Dierks, Miklo said there is en item on the November 9 City Council egenda to set a public hearing for November 23, 1993 on this application. Recessed at 9:15 p.m.; reconvened at 9:32 p.m. 2. ANN92-0003. REZ93-0015. Public discussion of an application submitted by Sycamore Farms Company to annex an approximate 420 acre tract of land located south of Highway 6 and the southern corporate limits, and to rezone the parcel from County RS, Suburban Residential, to RS-S, Medium Density Single-Family Residential; RM-12, Low Density Multi.Family Residential; RFBH, Fectory Built Housing Residential; RR.1, Rural Residential and ID-RM, Interim Development Multi-Family Residential. (45- day limitation period: weived to Novembar 4, 1993.) Miklo noted staff had provided the Commission with an updated list of conditions, which reflects the discussion at the November 1, 1993 informal meeting; staff has no further information to add at this time. Bormann noted she had distributed a new dreft of the conservation easement; the future dedication section has been revised to reflect the discussion at the November 1, 1993, Informal meeting. It now reads .If the grantor does not dedicate the property to the City prior to a change in Council membership, the new City Council will determine whether to accept dedication of the property. Nothing in this agreement obligates future City Councils to accept dedication of the property.. She reminded the Commission a glossary of terms would also be Included in the conservation easement. Public discussion opened at 9:36 p.m. Steohen Brioht. aoolicant, expressed appreciation to the Commission for all of their efforts in dealing with the complicated issues involved in this epplication; he feels the result of a year of discussion between the developers, the Commission, end the public is a good balancing of affordable housing and environmental concerns. He seid it is Important to move this process onto Council in order to provide affordable housing in 1995. Bright suggested revising the second proposed condition so that construction of the trail system is triggered when the ID-RM zone is removed. He said his understanding of the fourth condition for a 100 foot buffer zone allows the developer the right to mitigete those areas on a two-for.one basis within the .Snyder Creek Bottoms.. Miklo noted that such mitigation would be subject to approval by the Army Corps of Engineers. 0'24(4 --'-- i, , , i; , , \ ; 1'i I II I' I, II ! I I I 1" II I \" " r " f ! : I,' '! I n: Il I' I'i i! " : ,,' i I: j I , Ii II: I Ii , I Ii , I I ,I ,I I, ' 'I , ' Ii I 'I I I , ii 'Iff''' , ....... ---..,~- ........-,.....~..-'.......--------~.... -------,~... .... - ~ ... ~ r ,".:..., i " ,,'-' -t' "," .,' .' '/"1' "./""" J-I ,:I ' ,,' , ',,; .:'. I, '2.. . '.'..h r.If I ,I ~"" '. '. '.' - , '1 Planning & Zoning Commission November 4, 1993 Page 13 Bright said the lenguage allowing an alternative location for a pedestrian access easement in the seventh condition was added at his request because he would prefer not to tie down the specific location until the platting process. Bright said, with regards to the City paying the oversized costs for the proposed east- west arterial street through the area, the street is being designed and placed in the area because it connects to an interstate highwey end will become the south by-pass of Iowa City, The traffic that will use the street will not be neighborhood traffic end he believes the street will be a City or state road and should be paid for by the community. He said the CHAS report puts a mandate on the City to change rules to make affordable housing available in the community. The developers have already lost an entire row of mobile home pads when the boundary of the no-build area was moved to the top of the slope; this street may serve to take away another row of pads. He does not believe it is appropriate to put the cost of the proposed thorough-street on this development. Franklin agreed with Bright's comments about the proposed road. Staff is attempting to reserve the right-of-way; the intention would be that if that road was not needed for development, it would be City project; if the road is needed to get access to this development, the developer would be expected to pay the local road costs with the City paying the oversized costs. This is typically the manner in which the City handles arterial streets; they ere willing to consider that position in this annexed area because of the importance they feel for the street network and the provision of affordable housing. Franklin said staff does not anticipate having to build the road as an arterial for many years but is concerned with reserving adequate right-of-way during the rezoning process. Richard Rhodes II, 2014 Rochester Avenue, thanked the Commission for taking the time to carefully examine the various complicated issues involved in protecting the wetlands and the Snyder Creek Bottoms. He also acknowledged that the Sycamore Farms development team has,made some very significant concessions to protect these areas. Rhodes said he assumes thet even if the land is dedicated to the City, the easement would still run with the land and restrict the activities of the City. Bormann said that would be the case only if there is a third party grantee; if the City is the grantee, once the land is conveyed, the easement rights converge with the property ownership rights. Rhodes said, with respect to the proposed bluff-top road above the wetlands, extreme precautions will be needed during construction of this road to ensure that the wetlands below will not be damaged by siltation and construction activities; this will probably significantly increase the costs of putting an arterial through this area. He said he is not sure an erteriel street in necessary, except for use as a by-pass around the south and east sides of Iowa City, Rhodes said thedecision to require a 60 foot buffer around the jurisdictional wetlands on the Snyder Creek Bottoms within the area of the easement is a wise choice and does buffer the wetlands from some of tha negative impacts of the farming going on ~414 JJl .DIl_ ___ , , i \ Ii Ii 'i' I il I' II' II' ( ., I \ I I' , ,. i ( 1'1 i! " I I,: I II I I , I I I i ,\ .I " f -..".,..~'" ----- -- "1 ---.... ~-- ~:.-r......-- -- ~w .........---------T~.... ~".... .. - . -,~ - .------"..- . , , f ,'. "-' :.... f-7t--- . , . ' ,,', . .... ,., \ , , ; " ", ~:l, ,<'" 'N ' " ", ' ',', ",'" :' , .:' "g. . ',' '-.,' ~~\'" ',.' '," '1 Planning & Zoning Commission November 4. 1993 Page 14 around them. He said what will be planted in the buffer zone must be considered; aggressive cultiveted gresses should not be planted. Lon Drake. Universitv of Iowa Geoloav Professor, said he agrees with the concept of planning davelopment In larga piacas as was dona with this application. He said he does not feel that an arterial road through the area is appropriate because the property is already surrounded by roads in all directions; he would rather see local roads for local traffic in this area. Drake said he feels the developer has gradually sacrificed a number of things and should not be called upon to give up more land for an arterial road. Public discussion closad at 10:02 p.m. BovbJerg moved to approve ANN92-o003. Cooper seconded. The motion carried on a 6-0 vote. Dlarks movad to approva REZ92-o015 subject to: 1. Adequata measures will be taken to protect the 'Snyder Creek Bottoms" from any advarse effects from development of adjacent areas. These measures shall be specified In a mitigation plan to be submitted with a preliminary plat for the araa. prepared at the expensa of the applicant. and approved by tho City. 2. Tho mitigation plan shall Include a concept plan for a trail or walkway systam within tho 'Snydar Creak Bottoms," The subdivider shall construct tha troll or walkway system whan either 50% of the property within the RS-S and RFBH zones are developed or when the ID.RM area Is rezoned. whichever occurs first. 3. The preservation of the "Snyder Creek Bottoms' via the establishment of an acceptable conservation easement. 4. A 100 foot no.bulld buffer 'zona shall be established around all Jurisdictional watlends Identified outslde of tha conservation easement. excapt those for which mitigation Is approved. as enumerated In tha conservation easement. 5. The applicant shall Inventory and document tho Jurisdictional wetlands. other conservation values and the location of existing farming activities In the "Snyder Creek Bottoms'. Said Inventory and documentation shall be approvad by the City. 6. The dedication of adequate open space to the Clly based upon tho formula contained In the neighborhood open space plan. 7. Tho estebllshment of a padestrlan access easement over the existing Southeast Intarcaptor Sanitary Sower easement or In an'alternatlve location. approvad by the City. which connacts the trails within the Whispering Meadows Subdivision end the Clty-owned property to the south of the Sycamore Farms property. J~(4 - .....' . '\ :1 . , , '. . I r ' . ~ i . ," ' , t-I' , ' hl' 18-' I, , , I' --,"' ,," .,', .. , ' I . ' , . '., \ ~. . '," " " i':," "I'" " : . ~ 'iI".......... ~"'R' .' " Planning & Zoning Commission November 4, 1993 Page 15 B. A covenant providIng for a 15-acre school site, the location of which shall be negotiated with the City and the Iowa City Community School District. 9. The developer paying all costs for Infrastructure Installation, Including oversized costs except for the proposed eaat-west street Jakobsan seconded. Scott said if the Commission wishes to include a condition. for the provision of sufficient right-of-way for an east-west arterial street north of the Snyder Creek Bottoms, he proposes it read "The provision of sufficient right-of-way for an east-west collector street north of the Snyder Creek Bottoms" and possibly make mention that the City shall pay oversized construction costs for sny modification of the said collector street, as opposed to referencing the arterial street. With that recommendation, he would want the Commission to request a meeting with the staff of Planning and Programming, Public Works, and the City Manager's Office to discuss the potential of altering the streetscape both from the standpoint of required right-of- way and required overwidth of the pavement st sections other then the intersections; this goes back to previous discussions concerning the Commission's reluctance to pave a 34 foot concrete ribbon from the west end to the east end of this particular subdivision located immediately south of a residential zone and immediately north of the conservation easement and some of the Jurisdictional wetlands. The Commission does not deny that the City will need to have additional right-of-way and additional width for intersection turning lanes but there is a reluctance on the part of the Commission to include this issue as a condition at this particular time. Scott said on September 23, 1993, the Commission took ection to try to resolve some of the differences that still remained between the developer and the City; all of those have been resolved except the roadway to the RM-12 County-zoned area. The recommendetion that was approved by a 5-0 vote at thet meeting was for 6 1/2 inches of PCC concrete or 8 inches of asphaltic concrete roadway, built at 22 feet wide without curb and gutter on the present available right-of-way end that upon the ID-RM zone change, the street would be brought up to City standards at collector status. He said that motion seems to be In conflict with one condition proposed by staff to require the provision of sufficient right-of-way for an east-west arterial street north of the "Snyder Creek Bottoms"; that condition wes excluded in the Commission's present motion. If the Commission Is comforteble with voting on the motion currently on the floor, the Commission mey find a requirement to include a condition concerning the roadway to the RM-12 area because the Commission did Indicate In their motion of September 23, 1993, that they feel the street should be a collector street; es a separate motion, the Commission could request the consultation he mentioned earlier. In response to a question from Bovbjerg, Scott said the conflict would be the requirement for sufficient rlght-of-wey for an east-west arterial, which triggers a significantly greater right-of-way than a collector street; if It is a condition of the rezoning, the developer is going to have difficulty providing tpe sufficient right- of-way for a collector or arterial street on that section that presently serves as an access road to the RM-12 area because the developer only own 33 feet at present. J4/4 ._L1 - , : I ~ I, II J\; , I' I' I' II, :1 I I;' " I I , " " I " I I /; 1 I (: , l.~ I I I , I , I ,i I , I :i I " I I; I I " ! """"'- ..."".'" -- ~-..., -- ...- ~-~ ~ - ',."'~~ --.. lito . :.-. .. ----.....--- "~ ... - .... -~. ...... ... .~ " .:. " " ' 1 ' . r '. ,_' -' ...;,. I' . /'''' <,..,tJ, .I "L/, {',t, "",'" ,:,'", . _.,'. '\".. __ I' '. ,.' Planning & Zoning Commission November 4, 1993 paga 16 Miklo noted 33 feet of right-of-wey is also insufficient for a local street which requires 50 feet. Scott said the Commission has indicated they do not object to the development of that area under tha present RM-12 zoning if it was annexed into the City. He seid there must be sufficient provisions for that to occur without putting the developer in a catch- 22 situation. Scott said staff wents 85 feet of right-of-way and a collector street would require 66 feet of right-of-way. Scott said an arterial street would also limit access onto the street which requires a greater natwork of local streets to serve tha development; Franklin has indicated she would be more at ease with varying tha widths of stendards for local streets than for arterials. Scott said its seems illogical when talking about the potential for more affardable housing, to require putting in a road system that is not necessary in this particular subdivision; there is a far greater safety measure of speeding vehicles with 34 feet wide paving than if the width is varied from 28 feet to 34 feet at intersections to accommodate turning lanes. He noted additional land would be taken out of development if a street network is required because of limited access onto an arterial. Scott said he feels an east-west arterial to connect Highway 218 to Highway 6 should be located closer to the Napoleon Street location than in this particular subdivision. He said he has significant concerns about the inclusion of language that indicates the Commission is willing to put an erterial street through this area. Franklin suggested eliminating the street issue entirely from the rezoning decision and dealing with it when the area is platted. The Commission agreed. BovbJerg said this application represents 14 months of work and she feels It Is a good beginning, working, living, changeable document about environmentally sensitive ereas, adding she appreciates the applicant's discussion of cooperation between the Commission, steff and the developer. Dierks said the process has been frustrating and she appreciates everyone's willingness to take the time to provide Information and make compromises, adding she has learned a great deal about wetlands thet will hopefully make tha next application involving wetlands a little easier for the Commission. Starr said he appreciates the educational process that has been provided by persons Interested in this application. Jakobsen said she appreciates that issues were able to be resolved to the point where a decision could be made, adding the city will be a better city if more planning of large areas can be done. Scott thanked Sandy Rhodes and Steve Hendrix for their expertise in wetland matters and the Sycamore Farms development team for their cooperation throughout the entire process; he also thankad staff and the Commission for their patience and hard work. He said he is excited about the possibility of home ownership for under $50,000. Bovbjerg thenked Scott for his laadership. The motion carried on a 6.0 vote. Cooper movedto adopt tha conservatlon easement; as amended and to recommend adoptlon by the City Council of some oesement. Starr seconded. The motion carrlad on a 6.0 vote. ~4(4 &. -- ; : , , , i , Ii ~ II 'I' [I, II ! Ii' I , I \ I " I i ,I j; I' II f~ I , 1\ " I I ,I " ,I :i " , , :i ~ i . r, 'f-I' ',.:"','. ij' ~:~',!,t" " "":,,, ,"', ~ ' I . .J, ' .I . '.: "; '. '~~ .'.,' 'I'." 'M ", - .' .... .... / , " , Planning & Zoning Commission November 4, 1993 Page 17 Scott thanked Bormann and Bright for their work on the conservation easement. 3. Public discussion of amendments to the Zoning Ordinance, Section 36-58, Off.Street Parking Requirements; Section 36-60, Sign Regulations; and Section 36-9, RFBH, Factory Built Housing Residential Zone, to allow consideration of certain commercial uses as provisional uses in the RFBH Zone. Public discussion openad at 10:40 p.m. There wes none. Public discussion closed at 10:40 p.m, BovbJerg moved to approve amendments to the Zoning Ordinance Sections 36.58, Off- Street Parking Requirements; 36-60, Sign Regulations, and 36.9, RFBH, Factory Built Housing Residential Zone, to allow certain commercial uses as provisional uses In tha RFBH zone. Starr seconded. The motion carried on a 6'() vote. 4. Public discussion of amendments to Zoning Ordinance Section 36-58 regarding off- street parking requirements for multi'family residential uses. Miklo noted a revised table, clarifying the parking requirement differences between the PRM and CB.5 zones; staff also recommends adding a provision regarding exterior stairwells end the location of screening of parking if it is located under a bUilding. Public discussion opened at 10:42 p.m, Moen noted Joseph Holland had telephoned to indicate he was ill and unable to attend the meeting. Public discussion closed at 10:43 p.m. Stsrr moved to approve amendments to Zoning Ordlnsnce Sactlon 36.58 regarding off. street parking requirements for multi-family residential uses, Including: 1. When parking spaces are locatad on the ground floor or under a building, they shall be located alther within the exterior walls of a building or screen ad from vlaw from public streata. Featuras such as masonry walls, earthan berms, or evergreen trees and shrubbery shall be used for screening. 2. Access to Individual dwelling units shall be from enclosed lobbies or corridors excapt at grade level where exterior doorways shall be permitted for townhousa-styla units. 3. Tha tables displaying the parking requirements of multl'famlly dwellings, as presanted by staff, r,.'.... J.I.//~ , , , ; , i, i" (i I Iii I , , , I :i it I: ii' I I' I! " " " I i' :1 (, Ii ,; II I: If II I, I r , ., I I I Ii , 'I , I, 'f ,i ,r _ - '1 - ~..... ~ ..-'......- '-. , . '" . , .... . I " .' . , f".,:,' "t-I', ,;', ; ~': -I ' ,",,,,,,." ',0' 'I '. " '/.'-"" '.," . ... " . I' . _', . I ~ . . '.1' .:,":: ...:-..' ""., " \ k I . ~~\-. I' .' I , , '. ' Planning & Zoning Commission November 4, 1993 Page 18 Cooper seconded. The motion carried on a 6.0 vote. s. Public discussion of amendments to the Zoning Ordinance regarding the number of principal buildings permitted on a lot in the RNC-12 zone. Moen said this is essentielly a housekeeping issue; it was the intention of the Commission that this zone be principally a single-family residential zone. Because the title of the zone does not imply that it is single-family, there is ambiguity as to whether more than one principal usa is permitted on e lot. This ambiguity was intensified by the fact that, as a provisional use, multi-family structures were permitted; the intention was to only allow the continuation of existing multi-family uses and not allow the construction of new uses. Staff recommends the proposed amendments that clarify these particular issues be approved. Public discussion opened at 10:46 p.m. , \; ~, I,' Ii I: :1 Ii 'I' ,; 1: ' i.' I' i: 'I " I,~ I' Ii " I II II 'I I f. Nencv Carlson. 1002 East Jefferson Street, said, when this issue wes discussed a year ago, the neighborhood wanted only one principal building per lot and she believes that wes elso the intention of the Commission. She said she is appreciative of the fact that when it came to the attention of staff that this was not clear, that they made steps to correct it. She thanked staff and the Commission for all their help end for caring about this neighborhood. Public dlscusslon closed at 10:47 p.m. Cooper moved to approve amendments to the Zoning Ordinance regarding the number of principal buildings permitted on a lot In the RNC-12 zone, as detailed In the staff memorandum dated October 27, 1993. Starr seconded. Scott said it was absolutely the intent of the Commission when the RNC-12 zone was developed and extended to the Jefferson Street properties that It was to be a single- family zone. The motion cerrled on a 6.0 vote. 6. Public discussion of a request submitted by Systems Unlimited, Inc. to amend the Zoning Ordinance to allow unlicensed, but state-regulated, supervised housing for adults with disabilities In resldentiel areas zoned for single-family housing. Moen said the purpose of this request is not to debate the merits of this proposal but simply a request for the Commission to take up the issue of considering a future amendment to the Zoning Ordinence that would allow certain community supervised apartment living arrangements in predominantly single-family or low density multi- family zones that presently restrict this typa of arrangement as a consequence of the limitation as to the number of unrelated persons,thet cen live together, If the Commission decides they would like to take up the issue, they must determine when they would like the staff to proceed with preparation of those amendments. ;, ~LlI q - ~ - ~- lII/IIf//It"",.. ..... - ~"'1~- -~...~ ..-'IIJII."- ..... ...- - - ~Ff ~ ... -- - ,..-- f" ,', _,," ' "., '- ,:'),",'. ,.. ",'. ,-,' 'f I , I I ' 't., " ' .,;' . ." .1,', t_ :l.. ' " ; , , : ,,:' , ',,:,~. ',',' , ", -. ,'" ~:.:~' " : ' Planning & Zoning Commission November 4, 1993 Page 19 Public dlacusslon openad at 10:50 p.m. William Gorman, Executive Director of Svstems Unlimited. encouraged the Commission to take up this issue. In the process of looking for e residence for three individuals with disabilities and a live-In counselor, it came to their attention that they could not purchase a home in an RS-5, RS-S, or RFBH zone unless the residence became a licensed residential care facility. The irony is that Systems could purchase a home to make a licensed residential cere facility with many more individuals in any residential neighborhood. Systems believes what they are proposing fits nicely under Chapter 63 of the Code of Iowa for supervised community apartment living arrangements, which is well-regulated. An amendment to the definition of family care home, the option Systems is proposing, will fit well and also be a small environment, smaller than the normel licensed residential care facilities that are now aliowed in any residential neighborhood. PublIc discussion closed at 10:52 p.m. In response to a question from Starr, Moen said staff would need to examine the theoretical question of opening up low density zones to allow more unrelated persons than are presently permitted. In response to a question from Dierks, Moen said a distancing limitation has applied by State Code for family care facilities; she is unsure It stili stands. given some of the felr housing issues. Scott said the Commission discussed including this item in the fiscal year 1994 work schedule if it requires relatively simple alterations to the Zoning Ordinance; he requested staff investigate what would be entailed in order to determine how soon it could be considered by the Commission. BovbJerg moved to defer a request submitted by Systems UnlImited, Inc. to amend the Zoning Ordinance to allow unlIcensed, but state-regulated. supervised housing for adults with disabilities In residential areas zoned for single-family housing to November 18. 1993, Dierks seconded. The motion carried on a 6.0 vote, 7. Public discussion of a request submitted by Mark Collins of Sign Productions to amend the Zoning Ordinance to aliow additional messages on time and temperature signs. Moen said the intent of Mr. Collins was merely to offer his guidance on new sign technology if the Commission was inclined to consider changes to the Zoning i ' Ordinance regarding signs requirements. Public discussion opened at 10:56 p,m. There was none. PublIc discussion closed at 10:56 p.m. 014(4 '". ___ _1 - : ~ I, II !i 1 II: II II j:' " " " iF (,' !'j r 1\ ,; I 1: , [ ! I 1,: , , I " , ' q I' I II i' I" I ,I I Ii , I) I, r I ~Jr' - - ...,.,~~ .~...... ~ ,;'.......- , ' ( : I; .' _. .... , . , ': t-/ - '/":' U ,!d,' , '" ': ' ':1" 1:1..:....,. ",.' ','[ ,,<1.. . ., "" - '1 , Planning & Zoning Commission November 4, 1993 Page 20 Jakobsan moved to not consider amendments to the Zoning Ordinance to allow additional measages on tlma and temperature signs. Dierks seconded. The motion carried on a S.() vote. ' DEVELOPMENT ITEMS: 1. SUB93.0011. Public discussion of an application submitted by Dean Oakes for preliminary plat approval of Scott's Fourth Addition, a seven lot, 13.4 acre resubdivision of Lot 4 of Scott's Second Addition located in Fringa Area 8 west of Naples Avenue in the squtheast quad rent of the Highway l/Highway 218 interchange. (45-day limitation period wslved to November 4, 1993.) Miklo said the applicant has verbally requested a deferral to December 2, 1993; a written waiver of tha 45-day limitation period is needed. Public discussion opened at 11 :01 p.m. Larrv Schnittler. MMS Consultants, said he would provide a written waiver of the 45- day limitation period to staff. Public dlscusslon closed at 11 :02 p.m. Starr moved to dafar SUB93.()011 to December 2, 1993. Cooper seconded. If1g motion carried on a S.() vote. 2. SUB93-0019. Public discussion of an application submitted by Frantz Construction Co., Inc. for preliminary plat approval of Mount Prospect Addition, Part VII, a 31 lot, 8.72 acre subdivision located east of Sycamore Street end south of Lakeside Drive. (45.d3Y limitation period: November 4, 1993.) In response to a question raised at the November 1, 1993, informal meeting, Miklo said the setback requirement for a sidewalk that is dedicated as a right.of-way is 5 feet, which Is the same as if It was a lot line; a street right-of-way requires a 20 foot setback. He noted staff has received a revised plat: all deficiencies and discrepancies have been resolved and the plat is in order for approval. Public discussion opened at 11 :03 p.m. There was none. Public discussion closed at 11:03 p,m. Bovbjerg movad to ,pprove SUB93.()019. Cooper seconded. The motion carried on e 5'().1 vote. with Jakobsen abstainIng. 3. SUB93.0021. Public discussion of an application submitted by Windsor Ridge Davelopment Co. for final plet approval of Windsor Ridge Subdivision, Parts One & ~L/(~ ...",,,'",,..1...1.1..,.....__ U'___"'MMIIMIIMMIllIII ~_..._'..."'~..hnft...."""".."nnn.."n''''..n.....................n'_ ; I i , I,' ~ I I:, , I,: i I II Ii , I " I' I " iI, .' I ii I' Ii I' I': I r I' " " i' I /,1 " f , i T I,; , :1 I! . , I " I I I I Ii ,~ " .i 'IIff''' , ...... - ~-----.;.--..;- ~ .,-'WII....- -.- ~ . , . - , 0, i ,.' ~ ~-I ,,' " . n i;:: ""':'. . ': '.I:'-'~.' .,~/, . Gr-, :~~~.~ ,'" '" ' "1 Planning & Zoning Commission November 4, 1993 Page 21 Two, Three and Four, a 7S-lot, epproximate 67.2 acre subdivision loceted north of American Legion Road and west of Taft Avenue. (45.day limitation period: November 29, 1993.) Rockwell seid staff recommended deferral pending resolution of three outstanding deficiencies, noting the fourth deficiency has been taken care of. Upon resolution of the ~eflciencies, steff recommended approval. Public dlacusalon opened at 11:05 p.m. There was none. Public dlscusalon closed at 11:05 p.m. Cooper moved to approve SUB93-0021, subject to: 11 Legal papers being approved by the City Attorney's Office prior to Council consldaretlon of the final plat. 21 Construction plans and daslgn calculations being approved by Public Works prior to Council consideration of the final plat. 31 A ground cover and landscaping plan showing the location of the walkways and stormwater management facility within Outlot B In Parts One & Two and Part Four must receive administrative approval prior to Council consideration of the final plat. 4) Prior to City acceptance of the maintenance responsibilities for Outlot B, the daveloper must construct the proposed walkways ltrail) to conform with the Americans with Disabilities Act lADAl requirements. At a minimum, tha trail must be constructed at least eight faet In width. The trail must consist of a minimum base of four Inches of 3/4.fnch roadstone and a minimum topping of thres Inches of 3/B.fnch base materlallsald materfals to be compactedl. The developer must also provide approprfate ground cover and landscape the parkway according to plans approved by the City. Thesa plans must be submitted to and approved by the City prfor to Council consideration of the final plat. If the City deems It Is In the public Interest to accept dedication of the 22.25 acre psrkway, this dedication must not be accepted untllla) the parkway Improvements,lncludlng the stormwater detention facilities, are complete, and lbl construction has been completed on 90% of the lots abutting the parkway. Bovbjerg seconded, The motion carried on a 6-0 vote. CONSIDERATION OF THE MINUTES OF THE OCTOBER 21, 1993. MEETING: Cooper moved to approve the minutes of the October 21, 1993, meeting, as amended. Jakobsen seconded. The motion carried on a 6.0 vote. J~(i/ _11m .. ; , , , !:' \ I: Ii I Ii \1: I" li\, II' h I' III I II I' j'; I.; , " I,! Ii - I ,I I ! .~' ;i I , I :",1 " ...,.-,' - k-'.'- I I , I ! - ~ ---:--~..... . I. ',: c/:" ,,1/.' ,t',' ,(~:, , " "',,, :. ';,' I ,,'- ,t~.. . ".~. .', '. ,J . '--, . / // "\ " 1 .I ' \' ...........---, ~--'-" .._- Planning & Zoning Commission November 4. 1993 Page 22 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION INFORMATION: Moen reminded the Commission of a joint City Council/Board of Supervisors meeting scheduled for November 15, 1993, at 4:00 p.m.; one item on the agenda is discussion of the proposed Fringe Area Agreement. Dierks said she had a'ttended a meeting on gangs in Iowa City the previous evening which was a real eye-opener; one of the topics discussed was how low and moderate income housing attract gang leeders to target those area for gang members. A state statute permitting an ordinance that would allow tougher penalties for persons found selling drugs or weapons within a certain distance from a school may currently be on the books. She requested legal staff investigate the state statutes to determine what currently exists. ADJOURNMENT: BovbJerg moved to adjourn at 11 :11 p.m. Starr seconded. The motion carried on a 6'() vote. Ann Bovbjerg, Secretary Minutes submitted by Nancy Schreiber ppd.dmlnlmln.Il'&Z11"",mln .. "'" '.~,.,,,, 0l4/4 , , , i , I " I;' 1 I II ii, 'I, i !: j.: 1/ I' Ii r:; I 'f , I " I Ij I I ; I I I I ? , , i ; .!.... , iI I , , \ '\.: ~ -..-, ..... - ...... .... - - '~..... -...~ .' '.' - '. . ,'('. I ',' f _ . ) - -. . " , t I , I I 't "" I 't.." ' - .,,~ I '. _ J., ,., . _. '. . " .,,' - :'. ....,.., . .-. " - , : -- ',.' , '.- j - .. '- I / :' ., ! P+z. R.€gllla.R. {;Ott~ meEfnJ~ }J 0 l), ,Lf ,I 'w; I 1'130 'P, m. ~i€.a.6e Si9~ IN: ~Q.mE,: Bcl.a~!S5: I odt f~ if 1<..~~ I. c. J. , i i ~ I , r ~ ! i g I I I . '~rI?4V" l(u eMSI;"") 'R\~AQ... 12. CA'~ Da... N, ~ .:t. .c:' ~'7.('}, tl'111~' cC~ "'(e I ,JJ.~)uC:J.L . " '''0 02-111 ~\~cA'''\'l./.i( Avr #-'30 3 "f)! ~ (. , , \// . 7. 1..r.-'1\..1t.v1 ~'.x.nt.- <).J I) /V(tI<c:;... -I "": ,.-' :.tzta~.~r(.#'/?m~~4.- /0. 2) 6r. ')It 6___.,. '}\. \' u Ii. W /1.}..-k~JI 7..-J / '-( M~, (}y- .1:. l. 'J, In,.I) r<<jo(. ('co :-/,,."Jr' 13, ~'}~ CJJ. uM . \.~6i ~. ~~ ~ ~ 'II. ~ JJi::: ~ IS)" ( 1.'Jlt' (^-lit h~ . ...--....... "'.-.- ... -.. ,r .... ~ \ I , I I I I , I , ! i j i , , , , . !'I , " ~ i' I' Iii II I: ' Id . II, :! Il~\ 1,\, .\ '1'.:' .1.1. I.' ..' " t.! ,'. (: II ,; 'I[ Ii I I I I} i .,1, . , :i , 07YJY " , if ~'l: " .' ~ r:1 11 " II t [: " ,;' ~i I; II II ,< , ii ;! " " i'. - \2'1 fl~ .) )"; Ii " t " ~, ; " (! ;: " .'r !.i '-I i'i \; N 1.. ~'; 1.1 " ;; .,I! ~; " ,l~ r! ~.1 Ii I"~ :: t) l.' " .~) I" I' M " !',J '.I ~ ;, Ii Ii ~i t. ;) \! " . - "II'l-- ~ ~ - .... :,-r.... . ',I 1, , i' ", " ....;, '1 'i- .', ,.",', < ";' 'f-f" .I, ,: ,t,l " '. "'c ' ; ':.,', "l .,' .'~ ". . " '. ' .' ~, . -,-... . I I '1 !. , MINUTES DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE NOVEMBER 15, 1993.4:00 P.M. CIVIC CENTER - LOBBY CONFERENCE ROOM PREU~"NARV Subject to Approval MEMBERS PRESENT: Leura Hawks, Bill Nowysz, Don Sinek, Clara Swan, Craig Welt MEMBERS ABSENT: Kim Merker, Gary Nagle, Gordana Pavlovic, Gilda Six STAFF PRESENT: GUEST PRESENT: Hall, Schoon None RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL: Recommended, by a vote of 4-1 (Welt voting nol, that the City Council implement the design concept of moduler newspaper vending machines as proposed in the ordinence submitted to the City Council on November 9, 1993. In the event the Council finds the modular units cost prohibitive, the Committee supports the concept of designating areas of the Plaza as locations for newspaper vending machines and providing adequata screening of the machines by using materials that can be easily Integrated with existing materials on the plaza. The Committee's recommendation refers to only the design and placement of the vending machines and not to the ownership issues. CALL TO ORDER: Vice Chairperson Swan called tha meeting to order at 4:25 p.m. INTRODUCTIONS: New committea member Laura HaWKS was welcomed and introduced to the Committee. CONSIDERATION OF THE MINUTES OF THE OCTOBER 18. 1993. MEETING: The minutes from Octobar 18, 1993, were reviewed. Welt moved to approve the minutes and Slnek seconded. The motion carried 7-0. DISCUSS SUBCOMMITTEE'S MEETING WITH THE DOWNTOWN ASSOCIATION: Nowysz explained that the subcommittee met with the Downtown Association lDT Al to discuss concerns for the downtown area in terms of current spece usage and design considerations. Nowysz stated that the attendance at the meeting by DT A members was disappointing. Side issuos were discussed more so than the main topic according to Nowysz. The side issues covered topics such as the question of artwork or banners displayed on the exterior of bUildings and tha concerns for sidewalk cafes. Nowysz said that the subcommittee was surprised to learn that members of the DT A were uniformed as to the existence of tha Design Review Committee and its role. The subcommittee decided that more needs to be done to aducate the' public about the Committee and design issues and discussed the possibility of a slide show presentation, Schoon stated that a slide show would be a good Jl/15 .J1. tI!j.M. , j. I', , ", I Iii II I: ..! .1. !l I:i , j:: ,- \ I. I- :,' i:, 'I ,j'!: i 1 I" I II !I , II ;1 I 'IfIr"" - -~~ ----...-, ~-- ~ ..-, ........ ------~ .' , ' f, ,- - ,'''';' , , . , " . t' I . , 14 1'1 ,'" ' . ~ I, I'" j :.1. ..', ",' ,',. . "', '-. j '.' - . , '. "~' ';. .. . '. ",.,' I ; '_. ", I I"'; I - . _.__ Design Review Committee November 15, 1993 Page 2 way to explain that the Design Review Committee is interested in maintaining the atmosphere of the downtown area and discussing future downtown davelopment. The entire committee agreed to support the idea of a slide presentation. Swan concluded the discussion by stating that the Committee should be proud of Pavlovic and Nowysz for their excellent presentation to the DTA. DISCUSS NEWSPAPER VENDING MACHINES ORDINANCE: Schoon briefly reviewed the proposed newspaper vending machine ordinance which is before the City Council. He stated that the cost component discouraged members of the City Council from supporting the use of modular units. The cost for an adequate number of units is $7,000 to $10,000. Schoon stated that the purpose of the ordinance is to designate an area on the pedestrian mall for newspaper vending machines and to have the m~chines be more aestheticelly pleasing to the plaza area. The options include screening of the existing vending machines with a wooden frame so that the vending machines would be visible from the front only, City.owned modular units that would call for regulation by the City as well, or making use of the kiosks elready in existence in the plaza. I I , I ~ \, 'I I' J (' il' I ; ! II , I, I: I,' il !' I: I: I' I I!! II , Ii I , I I I I I ,I Ii I 'I I: (, i., Sinek was concerned ebout the areas outside of the pedestrian mall and how they would be regulated. Swan steted that she preferred the kiosk. proposal if it were less expensive. Schoon said that the cost for using the kiosks has not been determined. Sinek was also concerned whether the newspaper companies would be asked to design specifically dimensioned boxes or whether the City would provide the boxes. Nowysz was concerned about disrupting the structure of'the pedestrian mall as it now exists. Nowysz felt that each newspaper had a unique style or design to their machines, but they should not be allowed to place the machines just anywhere in the plaza. .i) l: ,\' " Welt stated that he would vote for the most reasonable and economical design that would prevent a cluttered look and would not block space in the plaza. Welt also said that he had serious questions as to where the mechines would be located and how many machines would be ellowed. r i I,' ,z; ~ ,; r, " !~ i~ t; I"~ i! Hawks steted that she would favor keeping the unique design and features of each machine and somehow incorporate their storage area into the planters. Hawks also supported the kiosk design. Nowysz stated that he approved of the design Idea to place the machines in an area out of view and out of the wey as long as the design did not infringe upon the plenters other than extending wing walls at the end of the planter or a similar design. , Schoon stated thet the ordinance would be going before the City Council again on November 23, 1993, for consideration. Sinek stated that the Committee should give the Council their approval of the design aspect and support of the ordinance. Swan stated that the Committee should pass along its support of Nowysz and Hawks idea. Hawks moved to racommend that tho City Counclllmplemant the design concept of modular newspaper vending machines as proposed In the ordinance submitted to tha City Council on November 9, 1993. In tha event the Council finds the modular units cost prohibitive, the Committe a supports tha concept of designating areas of the Plaza as locations for newspaper vending machlnas and providing adequate scraenlng of the machines by using materials that can be easily Integrated with ;: r, ! , l' I' I " II 1~ l ~L/ /5 ' III'!I Il ______ ___________________ "'1(',,' -- .- , i I I I I j I ! t \ r ii :( , !: ~ i: /: I' \I , , q I' , " f: ,0 " " " f: ~! !. ~: f 11 ;i " p i: ~i ti 1'1 \~ l' \! 11 'r~ ,~ " U Q k tJ .i) I' t: II . l' " " ,~ , " " ..' " , " ! ~ , I Ij " , r " I: ! I: ~ ! ! " ~ 1 , ;:'......- '1-----""-: .......... ~ ",,-r ......- . '. . ' , '" ," '''r~1 ' j;:' 't-", I~i ' ' ' ',,: p '.. ' '.' I V ' , ' . : ..:...~ ...:.... ....:...' '_ ,J .', . . ,/ '. '1 " " ~-_..-.-. Design Review Committee November 15, 1993 Paga 3 existing materials on the plaza. The Committee's recommendation refers to only the deslgn and placement of the vending machines and n~t to the ownership Issues. Sinek seconded the motion. The motion carried 4-' (Welt voting nolo Welt stated that he couldn't support the motion because he didn't know if the screening option would be'more cost effective than the modular units. DISCUSS SIDEWALK CAFES IN THE DOWNTOWN AREA: Schoon stated that the owners of Gringos and Vito's were the only restaurant owners to respond to the sidewalk cafe questionnaire. Gringos owner stated they would need 6-S tebles and Vito's owner stated they would need approximately 1 o tables in order to make the cafe financielly feasible. Schoon said the present regulations would not provide sufficient spece to fit the number of tebles the restaurants are asking for. Welt stated thet the Committee wanted to see the sidewalk cafes implemented but a question of safety did exist and so far the Idee seems impossible. Welt moved to table the topic of sidewalk cafes indefinitely. Sinek seconded the motion. The motion carried 5-0. DISCUSS FUTURE RECOGNITIONS AND AWARDS: Swan stated that public recognition for the Committee with the community could be accomplished through the distribution of awards for design. Swan stated that the awards could be in the form of plaques or certificates or even letters. Hewks egreed with that idea. Nowysz stated that the Historic Preservation Commission already has a system of awards that are given out once a year on the merit of design and renovation. Nowysz stated that the Committee's awards could parallel the Historic Preservation Commission awards. Welt stated that the Chamber of Commerce elso gave out similar awards, but he would like to further pursue the award presentation idea. COMMITTEE DISCUSSION~ There was none. PUBLIC DISCUSSION: There was none. ADJOURNMENT: Vice-Chairperson Swan adjourned the meeting at 5:25 p.m. Minutes submitted by Angie Hall. ITwlI\dtoI1015.rrin ;l. Y/S - i , i , , , ! , i I I ; I I I , i I' I 1 I , J I' I II ~ : . - lJ I'.: Ii' " ' II' I:.. 11 Ii: :) 1'1 Ii II 'I:! I '1 I . i r ) i!! : Ii ;i r~" i 1 f i, I: " , ~ Ii !, ';} Ii t., t ri ~j '" " l; l,; " ,', :. :~ ;', i) "' " i:: f; ;1 t \i , , l:' ~ " n ~; '" ~ ~ ~ I, ~ I, E r, ~ , " " , ~ 'I ~ , , Ii ~ (I , f' ~ ! I ~ ~ " , ! I I ! i , f I"'. .......-. " ----- - i" 10\0 '1------... , . , . . '" 't-I' '':'', t-:-/'" . ,[" ~ " '," ",,' i...;', J, '," ", " : ",i , " '" " , ' I. '_" I" _ ': '. -~ - / ,:',\ '1' "-.---.....,~ MINUTES SENIOR CENTER COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 27 1993 MEMBERS PRESENT: Rufine Anciaux, Harold Engen, Mary Geasland, Bud Gode, Gerry Lackender, Tom Muller, Pat Peters, Mark Thompson MEMBERS EXCUSED: GUESTS PRESENT: Fred Krause Marjorie Belding, Mary Pat Conway, Mary Jane Kemp, Frieda Shannon - Council of Elders; Anne Burnside, First Assistant City Attorney CALL TO ORDERIINTRODUCTION/MINUTES/PUBLlC DISCUSSION: Geasland called the meeting to order at 3:05 p.m. She introduced and welcomed the guests. The minutes were approved as corrected. Engen/Gode. There was no public discussion. COMMISSION REPORTS: VIsionary Committee - Engen and Muller Engen and Muller reported that 44 individuals have been invited to be on the Visionary Committee. They said so far they have 26 firm commitments. Thompson said of those he called, four out of five agreed to be on the Committee. Gode said five of five of his agreed. Engen called twelve and five accepted. They said West was coming to the Center on the 11th to tour the building and to pick up information. Meisel reported that she had contactad both the Highlander and Athletic Club as possible sites for the workshop which will be all dey on November 9 and a half-day on December 14. Geasland suggested the Technologies Research Center. The consensus was that this was a good Idea and an excellent choice. She will look into this. . Voluntaer Dlnnar . Lackender Lackender reported that The Catering Shoppe would serve the dinner and Flappers Follies will be the entertainment. Thompson reported that he had arrenged with the Panhellenlc Council to do the serving. Peters will help with serving and cleanup. Everyone who cen will report to set up the dining room. Gode, Engen, end Muller ell volunteered to help with transportation. JL/lfG ! , , , ' I" , !, j I " II; I I , , !: I " I " , I: :! " '; j , i 1 I .1 I , 1 1 i I I , 1 i I , J I I ' I 'I" ,": . i; I I I, Ii I 1" \ "i I 1 1\: ,I! :1 , ' ," lfIIIIIJIIf""" ....... -----""----...- ~--~;'......------.. """QIIJ....---..------ "ff .. ...-- ... ~., !..... ..., \ . ,. . ..', f' t _ _' _ _. .' I t I' 'f' I ' t . , I' '~"', '4;.;.~' ',. '" , ~ '\ I, . I t ~. . t,(, ~l ". , '. . " . -" - -. -., " Senior Center Commission September 27, 1993 Page 2 City, County, Council of Elders - Gode, Lackender Gode reported on his visit to the City Council. He thanked those leaving the City Council for their past support, invited them to the fall potluck, told them about the successful fashion show, and explained the new Center Ambassadors program. 1: I' ;: Lackender visited both the Council of Elders end the Board of Supervisors. She said the new chair for the Council is Mary Jane Kemp. She seid they met Tamiko Dunbar, MSW intern, who will be at the Center until April. The Council discussed the trensportetlon survey, and a policy regarding candidetes for political office. There was a suggestion that it would be best if candidates reserved a room to answer questions and visit with participents, but that shaking hands and introducing themselves to people in the food line end at tables was elright. However, candidates should not be allowed to monopolize the time while participants were eating. \: ,'j ; i: " , li " ! 'I ,. Lackender said at the supervisors meeting she reported ebout the potluck, trensportation survey, and gave them the date of the volunteer dinner. i; " Garden Goodnass - Anciaux .;' [.: (: " ~, /, Ii Anclaux said the day she came wes very successful. There were 5B participants end 10-16 volunteers working. She reported 68 participants had signed a petition in favor of continuing the program. " !) t :f, h ,. i! il ~ .1 II ,., I', n " " , i' ~ d <- , ~ ft il G ,I! j' J rJ ( i; I I I I r ~ ~ , \ I , I After some discussion, the consensus was that the program will continue as long as volunteers are interested in working at it. SENIOR CENTER UPDATE. Meisel Meisel explained briefly the meeting regarding parking in the Chauncey Swan Pa'rking Ramp. Attending were: Gode, Muller, Meisel, Steve Atkins, Joe Fowler, Mike Foster, Tom Miskimen. She said they talked about 10-20 spaces reserved for seniors at a reduced rate of 200 per hour for those seniors who have a Senior Center lot permit. Miskimen from the Heritage Agency on Aging will reimburse those seniors for 1 Y, hours of parking cost If they eat Congregate Meals. Tokens will be available later. Meisel said this is a six-month pilot project and if it isn't used it will be discontinued after six months. Meisel said Gode and Geasland will be leaving the Commission et the end of December. Two new members will be appointed at the October 27 City Council meeting. New members will take office in January 1994. Their terms will expire in December 1996. She said women should be encouraged to apply for gender equity, Applicants should also be people who are active at or eager to get Involved at the Center. Meisel said the Commission last year agreed to ask for a full-time receptionist and did not get it, She said another Green Thumb worker will begin work in October, ~l//~ ....". _J~.:1. - )11:' i , ! , , i , ii' I Iii I ., , , , , , ! I , I , II: " I, (: 1\ II ,. d ).: " I: " ! ~ ~ I III I,! ! d , " I I , , I 'I 'I , I .....,.,,- """'",' - ._'" --- ~- ~-..-'_.... ~ .",... ~ --------....- .... -r~'" ...~.. I' . " ' , , . " , " ',' fr "j:) , cl ,:J "'. ,Q,' , ': . _ ' _ .' '_.. ~_V.' -::........--... ", ! Senior Center Commission September 27, 1993 Page 3 Meisel said the wall covering was complete in the game room and pool pleyers like it. She added the upholstering was complete, a new rug scrubber was purchased and the roof still leaks. Gode said the City Manager favors having an engineering consulting firm in to evaluate and make recommendations on the problem. Contacts with such firms will be made. COMMUNITY TV GROUP - Rogusky " Rogusky spoke briefly about PEG-SL goals and objectives, She pointed out the advanteges to SCTV to being a participating member of PEG-SL. These Include: being recognized as a legitimate member of Public Access, supporting each member's individual mission, defining our role in the community, managing resources wisely, sharing equipment and staff for , projects which could not be accomplished alone, and sharing a facility in order to expand production opportunities and foster stability. Rogusky said that working with mutual support will more efficiently serve the community's communication needs for the future. r: !: " :..1 ( ~ ' She explained that the group has made a commitment to work together. She said members of the Commission may be asked to serve on the committee some day. . ;. She said the Commission has voiced its support for SCTV's past needs and she hopes for its continuing support for SCTV channel, staffing and equipment maintenance and upgrade. , , I. i! t Muller complimented Meisel and Rogusky on pursuing membership in this group and suggested the candidates for City Council should be asked about their support for the Senior Center and SCTV goals. I: '. ~j , , l; 11 Ii ~: t.i q f: ~: t.: ~ , . " (, [1 ,,' Ii I: Ii ;.1 " B CANDIDATEs'nNCUMBENTS' USE OF SPACE. Rogusky and Council of Elders Members Conway said there had been some complaints about candidates in th~ dining room but, when participants were asked ebout it, as meny said they did not object and thought the policy as written was satisfactory. There were no suggestions for a different polley. LEGAL OPINIONS - Burnside Burnside said the present polley regerding activities of candidates et the Center Is alright. Burnside said in response to a formal request that the gift code on the Commission's ability to take Council members out for meals and/or coffee does not epply to City agencies. She said the general statement of legislative intent Included avoiding the "appearance of Impropriety" and suggested Dutch treat, which would take care of any questions, She said the dollar amount they were to receive was not more than $2.99. " Ii f! ;': i; fJ ~ ! " , , f ~: ri f I , t , I , ( , r Engen asked If Commissioners have any legal responsibility if someone sues them as a Commissioner. Burnside said no, that It would be suing the City who would defend Itself, She said Commissioners have no liability. ", ~ --- . -;--r"" .... .~...------- i " ~tJ/~ I ..<b.Qi ~ : J II': J! ~ II - II !\' . If I: i,: I' , " " ~ : ii F.' I: ('I I,I "I Ji Ii I' ,I I,: JI '( I I r I ' ,1 " :1 :{ ,'1 I, ,! , \',; /' j I ! I l ! t i , .. I, ~ I , I ! I' ~ , i j'..,....... ' , , ' ' I.: . "'U ,'er t'I!.1 :' ,', ":",' " " / I>\., ;' I J \' . ~" . .-". .....-.-, '- ~_h'" Senior Center Commission September 27, 1993 Page 4 PARTICIPANT'S LETTER - Geasland Geasland axplained the gist of the letter which she said was a protest to getting e parking ticket whila being out of the building while parked In the Center lot. She said since a copy was sent to tha City Managar, Meisel had written an answer end sent it to the City Menager. A copy of Meisel's reply es well as the participant's letter were circulated among the Commission members. There was soma discussion and a suggestion was made to put a blurb in the POST reminding participants that while in the Center lot they were supposed to be in the building. OPEN DISCUSSION - Geasland Geasland reminded tha members that the next meeting will be November 16. There will be no meeting In October. Geasland said the outgoing members' last scheduled meeting will be December 20. The meeting adjourned at 4:50 p.m. Minutes prepared by Joyce Phelps, Senior Center Secretary. Minutes approved by Bud Gode, Senior Center Commission Secretary. oc1N<cio27,1rin ~~/~ ! i I: [I 'I , Ii t I ,( I I J' ': i , , I " " " I: '\: ~ , " I , i,' :\ p I , " I I '1: ' I . ~ ' "1' .. ' ,", " ) , '~ . , d " \' .