Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout12-08-1998 CommunicationPOLICE CITIZENS REVIEW BOARD A Board of the City of Iowa City 410 East Washington Street Iowa City IA 52240-1826 (319)356-5413 November 19, 1998 C� oOP� R. J. Winkelhake, Chief of Police Iowa City Police Department 410 E. Washington Street Iowa City IA 52240 Dear Chief Winkelhake: This is to confirm our telephone conversation on November 18 regarding your presentation on the Special Crimes Action Team at a PCRB forum which was scheduled for December 1, 1998. Because the City Council expressed interest in attending the PCRB forum at the Broadway Neighborhood Center, or to watch it on cablecast, the Board has postponed the forum from December 1 to a later date, as yet undetermined. For rescheduling purposes, I will be informing the Board at their next meeting on December 8 of your availability on January 19. 1 will be in contact with you again after the December 8 meeting. Thank you for your continuing cooperation in scheduling this forum. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. Sincerely, /sY Sandy Bauer, Assistant Police Citizens Review Board cc: PCRB ✓ November 17, 1998 Council Work Session Page 1 November 17, 1998 Council Work Session PCRB Insert i PCRB 98-126 S2 Lehman/ Eleanor- Dilkes/ You got the memo. I am not going to go through in detail the recommendations that we made because they are all pretty clearly stated there. I guess what I would be looking for from you is some indication of whether you are generally receptive to the suggestions that we make and if so, we need to talk about the timing of it as stated at the end of the memo. We would recommend, if you are going to make some of the changes or all of the changes that we recommend to the procedures, that there be a deferral until the 15'h of December which would allow you to consider the ordinance change that is necessary on the I" and then collapse on the 150' and approve the procedures. I can answer any specific questions. Kubby/ I guess I liked some of them.... Not sure that I agree with others. For example, why the complainant, page 1.... Of the guidelines. That I don't understand the complainant would not be allowed to be at the meeting where they were deciding whether or not to dismiss it because of the timing issue of jurisdiction issue. Dilkes/ ... We recognize the PCRB's.... concern in allowing the complainant an opportunity to comment if it looks like a dismissal is appropriate because it is untimely or because it is not against a sworn police officer. On the other hand, I think the way the PCRB had set that procedure up made it very likely that at a forum sanctioned by the PCRB, there would be open discussion about the merits of the case and I don't think that is consistent with the way they have been operating or the way they are intended to operate. Kubby/ ... concern is that not everyone has good written skills that may be complaining.... Is there a way to allow that verbal argument with controlling the content of the argument?.... Dilkes/ I think that is one possibility... I think that would be a very difficult thing to do. Holecek/ Once confidentiality is breached, you can't put it back. The idea of allowing written material to be submitted in the form of documentation... that can back up what the timing issue was or who the officer involved is, is genuinely the type of evidence that would be looked at.... It is not an unusual thing.... Kubby/ There could be some educational bias here that I am concerned about.... People who are not lawyers that are complainants.... Not determined on education or literacy.... This represents only a reasonably accurate transcription of the Iowa City council meeting of November 17,1998 WS111798 November 17, 1998 Council Work Session Page 2 Holecek/ ....Even if something is summarily dismissed, the Board will have the opportunity to ask for that investigation to go forward as well as the complaint process going through the informal procedure with the Police Department as well. Kubby/ Dilkes/ Holecek/ The PCRB can't but if the nature of the complaint that I think involves serious allegation, I can insure you that it would be investigated. Dilkes/ In fact, when this issue initially came up and I talked to Doug Russell about it, there was some.... indication that the Board wanted the complaint that appeared to be untimely sent to them before it was sent to the Police Department so that they could make a determination.... I was not at all comfortable with that.... Kubby/ Where is the PCRB on that question hearing your concerns?.... We haven't really gotten anything in writing from the PCRB about what is their reaction. Dilkes/ .... We didn't confer with them when they drafted their procedures.... Our recommendation is if you plan to make changes or it is likely that you are going to, that you then send that back to the PCRB for comments. Lehman/ This will be sent to them for comments? Dilkest This assuming that you concur. Holecek/ Whatever portions that you do concur with, send back to them for their comments. Thornberry/ Or any changes. Lehman/ Right. Norton/ ... are we done with the one about the decision about not to take it? Kubby/ I don't know. Does anyone else have concerns about how the complainant may not be able to express themselves very well? Dilkes/ I did want to say one more thing... Sometimes timing issues seem sort of like a cut and dry kind of thing.... That is not at all the case sometimes and that is why there is a real concern that in order to talk about the timing stuff, you are going to have to talk about the facts.... Number of options... If the PCRB thought a This represents only a reasonably accurate transcription of the Iowa City council meeting of November 17,1998 WS111798 November 17, 1998 Council Work Session Page 3 discussion of the facts or an investigation of the facts, yes, they could proceed as they normally do. Kubby/ I would much rather err on the side of letting people express themselves in whatever form they felt most competent to based on literacy, education level, and personal style. If that means an additional executive session so that confidentiality isn't breached, I have, personally, no problem with that on the timing issue.... Norton/ If they are told it is untimely, then they can come in an executive session and explain.... Kubby/ Right, if they appear in person, it becomes an executive session or they can do it written.... Dilkest I don't know if the complainant would be appearing in an executive session. What I am suggesting that if it appeared from the correspondence from the complainant that there were additional fact investigations or fact inquiries that needed to be made, then one of the options available to the PCRB would be to discuss that in close session. Or if they didn't think they could make a decision on the timeliness issue, they could defer it pending an investigation in accordance with their normal procedures. Norton/ ... You want them to be able to do it orally, right? Holecek/ And I think what we are having to do here is weigh the possibility of erring on the side of the complainant not being able to express themselves in a written form against the possibility of having the officers and the facts of the case litigated in a very premature fashion when you are talking about a timing issue. And I think.... we have come down on the side of the balance being that it should err toward the officer at this premature stage because there are other forms that it can be continually pursued in by the complainant. This may not be that forum.... Kubby/ I guess I would like to send this one back to the PCRB to say is there another way that the balance is a little closer than what we are talking about.... Vanderhoef/ But they can go and make their complaint at the police anytime.... That is a place where they can do it verbally in privacy.... Kubby/ But it negates the whole affect of why we have the PCRB.... Norton/ It is not as good as going through the PCRB, I agree. Kubby/ At this point I would like to get four votes to send it to PCRB to say talk about this... and recommend.... This represents only a reasonably accurate transcription of the Iowa City council meeting of November 17,1998 WS111798 November 17, 1998 Council WQ* Sessigp f#ge 4 Vanderhoefl I think that will happen anyway... they will talk about any changes that we make... We will hear from them if they come up with another idea.... Norton/ But they want that called out specially.... Vanderhoef/ Holecek/ I do want to reiterate that there are only two issues before the PCRB at this stage: Was it filed within 60 days and does it involve a sworn police officer. They are very narrow issues to be decided by what type of factual discussion would occur in open session in exploring the question is why we have come down on the balancing being- Kubby/ I understand the rationale.... Champion/ What is your concern, Karen? Kubby/ I am concerned because of education levels, literacy and learning disabilities and styles of communication, that the written form that the complainant has who argue their case about not having their case dismissed because of timeliness.... That they aren't able to make their case articulately.... Sometimes for people the verbal option is much more effective.... Dilkes/ We said in the memo we had basically identified what the competing interests were and suggested that this was one way of resolving it and do come down more in one way and not in the other and I think they should have the opportunity to suggest other possibilities. Lehman/ And I would suspect they will. Kubby/ So in here.... There was, in the annual report, it talked about going from 60 days to 90 days and I didn't necessarily see that here.... Dilkes/ Back up here for a minute. That would be an ordinance change... Norton/ ...I am not sure I understand the electronic meeting thing... You can have electronic meeting as long as you- Dilkes/ ... This was actually an issue that did come up with the PCRB and I did talk to Doug about it and there is an Attorney General's opinion that pretty much says what we have said in there. Basically the open meetings law says that in order to have an electronic meeting, you have to make a finding that a meeting in person is unnecessary or impossible or something along those lines. The Attorney General This represents only a reasonably accurate transcription of the Iowa City council meeting of November 17,1999 WS111798 November 17, 1998 Council Work Session Page 5 has said that electronic meeting means when a participation electronically is necessary for a quorum, then you have got to meet that standard.... Kubby/ Except in one of the paragraphs it says if it is necessary for a quorum and the other one says if it is not necessary for a quorum. Dilkes/ That is because one is a electronic meeting where you have to meet that standard and two, whether participation is necessary is determined by the rules of the body and they are saying they are going to allow that. Norton/ One of them is an electronic meeting, the other one is electronic participation in a meeting. Dilkes/ Correct. (All talking). Thomberry/ I read in the paper the other day where the PCRB did not agree with the findings of the Police Department.... It named the officer. Holecek/ I think the report may have named the officer.... Thornberry/ Holecek/ The complainant had the ability just as like, for instance, under Iowa Civil Rights Commission complaints. The persons who are party to it are not constrained from discussing it. Lehman/ The first complaint we ever had was that way. Thomberry/ I was under the impression that the PCRB was to review the Police Department's investigation and to take complaints that the people didn't necessary want to take to the Police Department. That was a pretty small purview. It wasn't all encompassing.... Seems like they would like - Lehman/ Dean, we are going to discuss this, I think, at more length. I think all we are going to talk about here are the proposed revisions.... Thomberry/ One of the proposed changes is to eliminate the sunset clause. Is that right? Lehman/ No, I don't think so. Holecek/ There is within this information, there is one ordinance change that we are proposing and we are proposing the standard operating procedures to be amended This represents only a reasonably accurate transcription of the Iowa City council meeting of November 17,1998 WS1117" November 17, 1998 Council Work Session Page 6 to dovetail with that as well. There is one ordinance change that we are proposing and that is the participation of the complainant in the name clearing hearing.... Just that the SOP follows the ordinance. Vanderhoefl I have a question about keeping the confidentiality after a complainant has identified the police officer.... Reports... with this identifying number.... Suppose to keep the persods identity secret, it seems to me then that we need to change identifying numbers..... Holecek/ ... not the same number for each officer each time.... Vanderhoef/ Kubby/ When we do that... if there is a perception it the community that one particular officer is rude, it doesn't mean that they get disciplined for that but that maybe they get additional training and how can we track that. Holecek/ We can track that internally without creating prejudicial bias.... Kubby/ Because if it is not sustained, there is still that perception and there needs to be some focus.... a trend over time... Thornberry/ Lehman/ ... We are able to do that internally now.... Thornberry/ It is not working too well if the article in the paper.... Norton/ Holecek/ There was a blurp in the paper, Dean, that said that they were able to identify the officer through a previous report where the complainant had named the officer and the identifying numbers were the same. Vanderhoefl Dilkes/ We had been concerned about the numbering anyway and that clinched it.... Kubby/ I wanted to go back to the ordinance... When there is a name clearing heating and the officer goes to the heating and says whatever they said, how does the complainant ever get to respond?.... Dilkes/ Well that is not contemplated in the ordinance at all. I mean the PCRB takes a complaint, does its investigation now and there is no opportunity for response by This represents only a reasonably accurate transcription of the Iowa City council meeting of November 17,1998 WS111798 November 17, 1998 Council Work Session Page 7 the complainant. In other words, there is no adversarial proceeding contemplated by this ordinance. Kubby/ ... didn't the PCRB allow previously the complainant to be at the name clearing hearing?.... Dilkes/ They are making that suggestion but we believe that is probably principally based on the ordinance which we believe to be defective. Kubby/ Holecek/ The whole idea of name clearing hearing is to protect the due process property right of the officer. It is not to create an adversarial forum.... Kubby/ If the PCRB wants that forum, then we need to add some other section or talk about that. Dilkes/ It would be much more than a section. It would be a total re -write of the ordinance. Champion/ I don't think we want to do that. Dilkest There is a way that the complainant could be afforded an opportunity to respond and that would be because the PCRB has the right to interview the complainant.... Kubby/ Can they disclose what is said in the name clearing hearing to the complainant in an interview? Dilkes/ Yes, they can. Thornberry/ Does the PCRB investigate every complaint that is given to them? Holecek/ Generally they review a synopsis of the Chief of Police after the internal affairs investigation. Thomberry/ That is what I thought it was supposed to be.... Karr/ ... clarify something... That is once the report is received.... The PCRB has levels of investigation that they could initiate or contemplate and they state that very clearly what their steps are going to be and they could be a multiple of steps... They could initiate investigation. Thomberry/ This represents only a reasonably accurate transcription of the Iowa City council meeting of November 17,1998 WS111798 November 17, 1998 Council Work Session Page 8 Norton/ Karr/ But they can hire an independent investigation. Norton/ Kubby/ ...My question.... Was adding the complainants presence at the name clearing hearing just based on trying to be consistent on how it was written in the ordinance or was it because you wanted to allow that face to face response? John Watson/ (Can't hear). Karr/ He may have to step to the table. Watson / My recollection is we felt we needed to be consistent with the ordinance. That we didn't have a choice.... Kubby/ It wasn't really that you wanted them to have face to face response time. Holecek/ ... they were trying to be true to the ordinance and we are taking it s step further saying the ordinance is effective in that manner.... Norton/ Will we get a proposed ordinance change?.... Holecek/ ...7 — 8 words that get struck out.... Vanderhoef/ What was the timeline on doing this? Dilkes/ Tomorrow night you would defer approval of the standard operating procedures until December 15. Do the first reading of the ordinance on December 1 and collapse the second and third on the 15. Holecek/ Hopefully that would also give you time- Give the PCRB time to review our suggested changes and report back to you as well.... Kubby/ When we do that ordinance change about the name clearing hearing, will we also look at the 90 versus 60 days issue? Dilkes/ Well, the ordinance changes that have been- that the PCRB has made proposals about and I think staff has some recommendations and I know it sounds like there has been some discussion that you had among yourselves, will not be done at that time because I anticipate that will involve a lot of discussion. We feel the need to make this change so we can get procedures in place.... This represents only a reasonably accurate transcription or the Iowa City council meeting of November 17,1998 WS111798 November 17, 1998 Council Work Session Page 9 Norton/ I understood... schedule a session where the council talk with PCRB about issue they raised in their annual report.... Kind of review the first year and where we are at, right? Lehman/ I was suggesting- I really think council needs to evaluate where we are compared to where we thought we were going to be... We can do that, based on our conversations, then schedule a meeting with the PCRB if we wish or we may choose not to.... It would be a good time.., to have a short discussion.... Our impression of the first year.... I think it would be good... very candid discussion.... Holecek/ We foresee the initial ordinance change that we are proposing to remove the complainant from the name clearing hearing process and pass the SOPs as something that needs to be done fairly quickly in order to take away the defect in the ordinance. But the other things.... Lehman/ This is something we need to do quickly. Holecek/ And that is why we are requesting that timeline. Lehman/ Right, Norton/ We should digest that first before we do it in company with the PCRB. Lehman/ I think so.... Dilkes/ In terms of scheduling again, if we schedule the bigger discussion for the 150, that is a little soon it seems to me. I am also concerned I don't want to get messed up with the SOPs.... (All talking). Holecek/ We do find this is critical and we would like to have this addressed as soon as possible.... Lehman/ Norton/ We didn't think about the workload on this committee among other things. Oh, boy. Kubby/ It may be that special discussions happens at their meeting and we go to them.... Norton/ If they send us an annual report, we need to respond. This represents only a reasonably accurate transcription of the Iowa City council meeting of November 17,1"S WS111798 November 17, 1998 Council Work Session Page 10 Lehman/ After the first of the year we will set a time when we can discuss the philosophies. Do we have other questions for Sarah or Eleanor? Champion/ Lehman/ ... you are suggesting that this be done in a very timely fashion. Dilkes/ Two sections in the ordinance that will be amended and it is basically removing the complainant from the name clearing hearing process. Lehman/ So we are going to defer this until- Dilkes/ And you will see that red line ordinance on your agenda for December la, the changes and first reading. Atkins/ Eleanor, John and I were just ... process question. Watson/ Our next regular meeting is the a of December. Does that give us time to comment on the changes in order for you to consider them on the 15'b7 Lehman/ Actually we are talking about considering them on the I' and 2" d and P reading on- Dilkes/ On the 1` we are only considering the ordinance change removing the complainant from the name clearing hearing process. The SOPS won't be reconsidered again until the 15u'. Karr/ Can I make a suggestion perhaps? I think the answer to that is very dependent on how much time PCRB wishes to research and take reviewing the information. What we may wish to do is leave it at the e. We have got first reading anyway. If PCRB wishes to request more time, they certainly could. What that would mean is we wouldn't collapse the second reading or pass and adopt. We would just simply suggested the accelerated schedule so it matched, right? So I think we could still move ahead with the ordinance but not pass and adopt until after we got the recommendation back. Lehman/ So we will defer this to the I'L? Kan/ No, you will defer this to the 15t" because you can't pass it until the ordinance is ready. You will give first reading to the ordinance, Dilkes/ The shortage track would be the 15t" depending upon.... This represents only a reasonably accurate transcription of the Iowa City council meeting of November 17,1998 WS111798 November 17, 1998 Council Work Session Page 11 Karr/ PCRB would have ample opportunity then with your scheduling also. Did that make sense? Thomberry/ Either to defer or not collapse. Karr/ You wouldn't collapse if you didn't have the recommendation. Lehman/ All right. Thank you, ladies.... Norton/ Vanderhoefl Oh, I have just a couple of things about the forum that is scheduled the I" of December. I would like to request that it be on television..... educational session.... Important... on television... will educate the entire community..... Lehman/ We could film it without televising it. Vanderhoefl Lehman/ Kubby/ There are some other reasons why the PCRB doesn't want all of their forums to be videotaped.... We could certainly videotape the educational part of it and not the forum part of it. Dilkes/ I would suggest you make that request to the chair of the PCRB.... Vanderhoefl Are other people okay with that? O'Donnell/ Who is going to this forum? (All talking). Vanderhoefl Something else.... The forum was not going to have legal counsel there.... I have been thinking about the importance about being real clear about what is legal and what isn't legal and educating our public and so forth. I would feel a whole lot better if legal counsel was at that forum.... Holecek/ I had a discussion with Doug Russell today about that very issue.... He does note that it is a public forum where the Board is not necessarily conducting business by motion, etc. However it is still a meeting that does need to be run in a certain decorum.... This represents only a reasonably accurate transcription of the Iowa City rgmeil meeting of November 17,1998 WS111799 November 17, l"S Council Work Session Page 12 Dilkes/ I think we left it that we were going to talk about it and get back to Doug tomorrow.... Sometimes things come up that require a response.... Vanderhoef/ Holecek/ Net effect of really wanting Doug to be there is that he can't be scheduled for the 1`. So the meeting would have to be rescheduled if we were going to require him to be there.... Vanderhoef/ December I.... I would like to see a big turnout for the public education part of this forum.... Kubby/ I think it is fine.... (All talking). Lehman/ Kubby/ Vanderhoef/ Lehman/ Thank you.... This represents only a reasonably accurate transcription of the Iowa City council meeting of November 17,1999 WS1117" Ac` `vity #: 11150 Prepared by: MARIAN KARR Acct # Account Name FORM-1 DEPARTMENT ADJUSTMENTS FY00 Division: Police Citizen Review Department Head Signature: %JjJ Finance Dept/Div Total Proj. Adjust. Req. 6120 Permanent Part Time 15,812 0 15,812 6310 Fica 1,210 0 1,210 6320 Ipers 909 0 909 6420 Life Insurance 52 0 52 7110 Office Supplies 298 0 298 7120 "Books, Magazines, Newspapers 0 100 100 Justification: research materials 7140 Minor Off Equip/furn 139 0 139 7153 Misc. Peripherals 130 0 130 71 Printer Ribbons 28 0 28 7324 Office Equip Rep Mat 522 0 522 8122 Attorney Services 4,263 2,237 6,500 Justification: 1st quarter expense $1667. Previous 12 month $8736. 8221 Postage 0 300 300 Justification: public hearing/forum notices 8223 Couriers 17 0 17 8319 Travel 0 250 250 Justification: SEE FORM 2 8340 Meals (non -travel) 96 0 96 8824 I.s.-micro Cmptr Chg 1,640 0 1,640 8825 I.s.-cmptr Repl Chgb 990 0 990 8841 Supply Room Chgbacks 244 0 244 Ac''vity #: 11150 Prepared by: MARIAN KARR Acct # Account Name FORM 1 DEPARTMENT ADJUSTMENTS FYOO Division: Police Citizen Review Department Head Signature: Finance Dept/Div Total Proj. Adjust. Req. 8842 Print Shop Services Justification: flyers, brochures, forms. 8843 Photocopying Chgback 8847 Mail Chargebacks TOTALS FOR FORM 1: 159 91 250 504 0 504 416 0 416 27,429 2,978 30,407 TRAVEL COSTS FORM 2 FY00 Activity #: 11150 Division: Police Citizen Review Provide a detailed listing of all travel costs by purpose and location. Indicate the staff position intended to attend. This should include all travel costs, registrations, tuitions and training fees. Education/Travel Description Position 001 Conference or training Board or staff TOTAL NUMBER OF REQUESTS: 1 TOTAL DOLLAR AMOUNT REQUESTED: 250 Cost 250 Novnndutr 10, 1998 F BY FAX AND REGULAR MAIL oryo Co Douglas S. Russell O Attorney al I aw 4g! 221 1/2 F. Washington St. Iowa City, IA 52240 Re: PCRB Meeting Agenda for November 10, 1998 Dear Doug: CITY OFIOWA CITY Per your request during our telephone discussion, this letter will serve to set forth my understanding of Rho nature of Chief Winkelhake's participation in tonight's PCRB meeting. First, while it is clear that this meeting will be open to the public, based on Chief Winkelhake's Communications with the Board it is his understanding that he will be making a presentation to the Board on [tie current huilding search policy and answer questions from the Board regarding that policy. Chief Winkelhake has not been notified that this is a public forum and thus has not proparod to discuss or debate this policy will) members of lire public. Second, in reviewing the agenda, I note that the Board has included as a separate item "discussion with Chief of Police R.J. Winkelhake regarding the issue of data collection on traffic slops." It is my understanding that Chief Winkelhake responded to the Board's request for his input on this item in previous correspondence, and that the Chief will likely reiterate this ret:ponsn to the noarrl on this issue. Please feel free to call me if you have any questions. V truly yo Eleanor M. Dilkes City Attorney cc Swah Holecck, First Assistant City Attorney Steve Alkins, City Manager R. J. Winkelhake, Chief of Police Marian Karr, City Clerk 410 1'ASI WASIIINC1r1N Slat LI • IO.A CI IY, IOWA 1)709.1176• 11111 110-5000• FAX I1111 11I•1001 Novomhor 13, 1998 Sent by hAX and Regular Mail Douglas S. I Wssell, Attorney at Law 221 %, E. Washington St. Iowa City, IA 52240 FAX: (319) 351-f409 Re: PCRB Doar Dou I 4 CITY OF IOWA COPY CITY As I holed during our recent telephone conversation one of the changes to the PCRB procedures that I will be recommending is that the Board's legal counsel attend all meetings of the Board. My memo to the Council, a copy of which you should receive with this letter, explains my reasons [of this recommendation. It is my understanding that the PCRB has scheduled a public forum at the Broadway Neighborhood Center on December 1, 1998 and that the topic on the agenda is the Police Dupalttie( it's Special Crimes Action Team (SCAT). I understand that you are unable to be presenl at that meeting. Consistent with my recommendation to the Council, 1 do not believe it prudent for the PCRB to be without representation at that meeting and suggest that the Board consider rescheduling its meeting until you can be available. Please rmll it you have any questions. Ve truly yours. �.0 k Eleanor M. Dilkes City Attorney cc Sieve Alkins, City Manager R.J. Winkelhake, Police Chief Sarah Holecek, First Assistant City Attorney :b 11 LI A.: •IY rAsI WA%111 M 141OA' >I it J'1 • it) WA I'IIV. IOW♦ I)144-1016• I)It I I$O,)000• r A X I)III JJO.I*CI POLICE CITIZENS REVIEW BOARD A Board of the City of Iowa City 410 East Washington Street Iowa City IA 52240-1826 (319)356-5413 November 13, 1998 OOFY Mayor Ernest W. Lehman 410 East Washington Street Iowa City, IA 52240 Dear Mayor and Council Members: At our meeting of November 10, 1998, the Police Citizens Review Board unanimously voted to request an extension of the 30-day reporting deadline according to Section 1 of Ordinance No. 97-3792 for PCRB Complaint #98-17. At the request of the Police Department for additional time, we are requesting an extension of: • PCRB #98-17 —Report presently is due November 19, 1998 Extension request — Report would be due December 18, 1998 The Board appreciates your prompt consideration of this matter. Sincerely, i Leah Cohen, Chair Police Citizens Review Board 98 NOV 10 PM 4: 12 G' I ' Enti MEMORANDUM" cir-r, lowa TO: Leah Cohen, PCRB Chairperson FROM: R. J. Winkelhake, Chief of Police RE: TRAINING MANUALS DATE: November 10, 1998 Attached are seven copies of the Iowa City Police Department's Field Training and Evaluation Program. The manual was revised in March 1997. s— mz.,t �-