HomeMy WebLinkAbout05-11-1999 Communication Mr. Bruce Nestor, Attorney at Law
311 Iowa State Bank Building
102 S. Clinton Street
Iowa City, IA 52240
Dear Mr. Nostor: CITY OF I0 WA CITY
This will respond to your April 29 letter where you offered comments concerning the
public forums sponsored by the Iowa City Police Citizen Review Board (PCRB). This forum
as others have been undertaken by the PCRB at their direction and with the knowledge of
the City Council,
With respect to your comments concerning the Chief' s apparent absence for a portion of
the forum. To the best of my knowledge the Chief fulfilled his obligation as directed by the
PCRB. In letters dated March 11 and March 21 to the Chief it confirmed the structure of
the April 28 meeting and the expected participation by representatives of the Iowa City
Police. As to what you were told by PCRB members, I cannot comment as to "who said
what to whom." However, the correspondence appears to be clear and the forum was to
hear comments 'to the board."Of course I am sure the Board could have asked the Chief
and/or others to remain, appear for further questions, etc.
The letters are, in my judgment, specific and explain the Board s desires for that evening's
forum. I will quote from the March 11 letter from PCRB Chair Cohen that states, 'Because
of the nature of your presentation, we expect a question and answer session will follow.
However, I want to limit your participation to 30 minutes so that the remainder of the time
will be available for comments to the Board."ln the March 21 letter which was also signed
by the chair of the PCRB she states 'Our understanding is that your presentation and
question and answer portion that follows will be 30 minutes so that the remainder of the
time will be available for comments to the Board."
With respect to the 'hational debate" and other issues such 'racial profiling", the Police
Executor Research Forum (PERF) is conducting research on this and other matters. It is
their desire to develop policy guidelines which I would assume would be directed to the
International Association of Chiefs of Police and thereby to our country's police
departments. The Iowa City Police Chief is a member of PERF and will be participating in
those discussions. The PERF is substantially directed at larger communities, something we
have learned over time, and we do our best to encourage that this type of national debate
also be directed at smaller police departments such as ours. We will wait the research and
their recommendations.
Sincerely,
cc: City Council
Chief of Police
PCRB
Press-Citizen
Gazette
Broadway Neighborhood Center
tpS-2sa.doc
410 EAST WASHINGTON STREET · IOWA CITY, IOWA 52240-[826 · (319) 356-5000 · FAX (319) 356-5009
I~2RB }4~di~tio~fl~tt. 1, to Comphin~t ~fl~r con~ht is filed - 5/11/99
Name
Address
City, State, Zip
Dear :
· The Police Citizens Review Board acknowledges receipt of your recent
Complaint.
In addition to the Iowa City Police Department's investigation and the
subsequent PCRB's review, another option available to you is formal
mediation. This would occur when all parties agree to meet with a mutually
acceptable third-party mediator (non-City staff) in an attempt to reach a
resolution of your complaint. This mediator would be a neutral party who is
specially trained in mediation. This is offered at no expense to the parties.
You may also meet informally with the police officer who is the subject of
your complaint and the department supervisor of the police officer if you
wish to do this in an effort to resolve your complaint informally. If you
would like to proceed with an informal meeting, please call the Chief of
Police, R.J. Winkelhake at (319)356-5270.
Either alternative is available to you at any point during the investigation
process. If you are interested in pursuing formal mediation, please contact
Sandy Bauer at 356-5413 or Marian Karr at 356-5041.
Sincerely,
Leah Cohen, Chair
Police Citizens Review Board
cc: R.J. Winkelhake, Chief of Police
PCRB
PCRB M. ed~,~fLtr. 1(~ )- to (~i~with 1 (b) - 5/11 D9
Date
Dear Chief Winkelhake:
The Police Citizens Review Board has received Complaint # . filed on
Formal mediation is available at any time during the Police Department's
investigation and the PCRB's review upon written consent of the
complainant and the police officer(s) involved in this complaint. A letter has
been sent to the complainant offering this formal mediation. Would you
please present the enclosed letter to the appropriate officer(s) named in the
above-mentioned complaint. If he/she expresses an interest in formal
mediation, would you please contact the City Clerk's Office, and we will
then provide the officer(s) with the mediation packet.
Thank you for your assistance in this matter.
Sincerely,
Paul Hoffey, Chair
Police Citizens Review Board
(Enclosures)
cc: PCRB
PCRB Mediation/Ltr. l(b) - enclosure with l{a) - 5/11/99
Date;
Dear Officer :
The Police Citizens Review Board recently received Complaint
In addition to the Iowa City Police Department's investigation and the
subsequent PCRB's review, another option available to you is formal
mediation. This would occur when all parties agree to meet with a mutually
acceptable third-party mediator (non-City staff) in an attempt to reach a
resolution of your complaint. This mediator would be a neutral party who is
specially trained in mediation. This is offered at no expense to the parties.
You may also meet informally with the complainant if you wish to do this in
an effort to resolve this complaint informally. If you would like to meet
with the complainant informally, please contact Chief of Police, R.J.
Winkelhake.
Either alternative method is available to you at any point during the
investigation process. If you are interested in pursuing formal mediation,
please advise Chief Winkelhake who, in turn, will contact Sandy Bauer at
356-5413 or Marian Karr at 356-5041.
Sincerely,
Leah Cohen, Chair
Police Citizens Review Board
cc: PCRB
A'rTOKNEYS AT LAW
~.~,.~.~- ,~,,.~,,.~ FOR YOUR iNFORMATION
IOWA CITY, IOWA 52244
April 29, 1999
Eleanor Dilkes
City Attorney
410 E Washington Street
Iowa City, IA 52240
RE: Proposed Amendment to Section 8.8-8-7 (B)(3)
Dear Eleanor:
Thank you for your correspondence of April 16, 1999, concerning the proposed
amendment to the PCRB Ordinance. The ordinance was reviewed at the Board's April
27th meeting and the Board is largely in agreement with the language you have
proposed~
One typographical error was noted in line 9 in which I believe the third word is intended
to be public." (Spellcheck doesn't catch those things). The Board raised two issues
with regard to possible additions to the amendment. These issues are: (1) whether the
notification to the named complainant and/or police officer, city attorney and police chief
(or city manager) should be defined as a confidential correspondence and (2) whether
the ordinance should specify the manner in which the notification prior to disclosure will
be made, be it by regular mail, certified mail, etc.
Otherwise I believe the proposed language gives appropriate guidance to the Board for
how the balancing test should be implemented. Thank you for your assistance in this
matter.
Yours truly,
STEIN & PUGH, L.L.P.
Catherine A. Pugh
CAP.kkj
cc: t.eah Cohen
Marian Karr, City Cler~
(for inclusion in PCRB information Packet)
C:~SItP~PCR B\DILKES A29
(r-, 1. What are your reasons for applying for this position?
2. Have you thought about what issues are likely to arise from work
with the PCRB? What is your expertise in dealing with these issues?
Open meetings and Open Records Law
Civil Service system
- criminal defense and privilege
- hiring and firing
- conflict of interest
3. What would you do if the Board is not responsive to your advice?
4. If there were a breach of confidentiality by a Board member, what
would you do as counsel?
5. What do you see as your role and time commitment for this position?
Spouses and relatives of City Council Members and members of comparable County
Boards and Commissions are not eligible for appointment to City Boards and
Commissions. This includes: spouse, child, mother, father, mother- in- law, father-
in- law, brother, sister, brother- in- law, sister- in- law, step-father, step-mother,
step-child, aunt, or uncle. (Resolution 85-354)
Males: 2
Females: 2
May 18, 1999
POLICE CITIZENS' REVIEW BOARD
One Vacancy - Unexpired Term
May 18, 1999 - September 1, 2000
NO APPLICATIONS AS OF 4:00 P.M. MAY 6,1999.
[] Denotes applicant completed the Confidential page of the application.