Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout08-14-2014 Historic Preservation CommissionIOWA CITY HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Thursday, August 14, 2014 City Hall, 410 E. Washington Street Emma J. Harvat Hall 5:30 p.m. REVISED AGENDA A) Call to Order B) Roll Call C) Public discussion of anything not on the agenda D) Discuss landmark designation for Tate Arms, 914 S. Dubuque Street E) Certificate of Appropriateness 1. 220 E. Jefferson Street (Landmark) — replacement windows 2. 514 S. Lucas Street (Govemor-Lucas Street C.D.) — new roof, new siding 3. 224 N. Dodge Street (Goosetown/Horace Mann C.D.) — chimney demolition 4. 710 Clark Street (Clark Street C.D.) — front porch improvements, replacement windows 5. 701 S. 7' Avenue (Dearborn Street C.D.) — add basement egress window 6. 1220 Sheridan Avenue (Longfellow H storic District) — close exterior basement door, rear deck improvements F) Report on Certificates issued by Chair and Staff G) Discuss Unitarian Universalist Building, 10 S. Gilbert Street H) Discuss Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) for mitigation measures to offset the adverse effects to historic properties, resulting from FEMAfun ded undertakings for the University of Iowa (Sabin School) I) Discuss CLG grant application J) Consideration of Minutes for June 12, 2014 — HPC Meeting K) Commission Information/Discussion Letter from Ginalie Swaim in support of DNR REAP Grant for City Park Log Cabins L) Adjournment r iZ=1:.poa CITY OF IOWA CITY ' '*'M-*1 MEMORANDUM Date: July 31, 2014 To: Historic Preservation Commission From: Robert Miklo, Senior Planner and Ashley Zitzner, Planning Intern Re: 914 S. Dubuque Street — Tate Arms Applicant XJ-23 LLC-Tate Arms has requested that their property at 914 S. Dubuque Street be designated as an Iowa City Historic Landmark. Designation of the property as a Landmark will require Commission approval of any significant changes to the exterior of the building. Landmark status will also make the property eligible for certain zoning incentives. The enclosed Iowa Site Inventory Form, prepared by Erica Blair, Friends of Historic Preservation, provides a detailed discussion of the building's architecture and history. The building was constructed in 1880 and operated from 1939 to 1963 as the Tate Arms. The house was owned by Junious and Elizabeth Tate who housed African American Students before they were allowed to live on the University of Iowa campus. The Tates were one of the few African American families to live in Iowa City in the 1930's and served an important purpose in providing housing for African American students. Prior to the Tate's ownership of this house, it was owned by Joseph Williams as the Williams Hotel. To qualify for designation as a Landmark, the subject property must meet approval criteria a. and b. and at least one of approval criteria c., d., e., or f: a. Significant to American and/or Iowa City history, architecture, archaeology and culture; b. Possesses integrity of location, design, setting, materials and workmanship; c. Associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history; d. Associated with the lives of persons significant in our past; e. Embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction; or represents the work of a master; or possesses high artistic values; or represents a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction; f. Has yielded or may likely yield information important in prehistory or history. Based on the information provided in the Site Inventory Form, staff finds that the property meets criteria a, b, c and f and therefore qualifies as an Iowa City Historic Landmark. Recommended Motion: Move to approve the designation of 914 S. Dubuque Street (Tate Arms) as an Iowa City Historic Landmark based on the following criteria for local designation: criteria a, c, d and f. Site Inventory Form State Inventory No. 52-05284 ® New ❑ Supplemental State Historical Society of Iowa ❑ Part of a district with known boundaries (enter inventory no.) (November2005) Relationship: ❑ Contributing ❑Noncontributing ❑ Contributes to a potential district with yet unknown boundaries National Register Status:(any that apply) ❑ Listed ❑ De -listed ❑ NHL ❑ DOE 9-Digit SHPO Review & Compliance (R&C) Number El Non -Extant (enter year) _ 1. Name of historic name other names/site number Williams Hotel: Dick Davin Realty 2. Location street & number 914 South Dubugue Street City or town Iowa City ❑ vicinity, county Johnson Legal Description: (If Rural)Township Name Township No. Range No. Section Quarter of Quarter (If Urban) White's Subdivision of Outlot Four County Seat Addition Block(s) Lots) 34 3. State/Federal Agency Certification [Skip this Section] 5. Classification Category of Property (Check only one box) Number of Resources within Prooertv ❑ district ❑ site ❑ structure ❑ object If Non -Eligible Property I If Eligible Property, enter number of _ oullaings 1 _ buildings sites _ sites structures _ _ structures objects _ _ objects Total 1 0 Total Name of related project report or multiple property study (Enter "NIA° if the property is not part of a multiple property examination). Title Historical Architectural Date Bass Number 6. Function or Use Historic Functions (Enter categories from instructions) Current Functions (Enter categories from instructions) 01A01 Residence 02A01 Office building 01 D04 Transitory housing/hotel 70 Vacant/not in use r. wauunption Architectural Classification (Enter categories from instructions) Materials (Enter categories from instructions) 07E02 Craftsman 09A06 HiDDed roof, 2 stories foundation 04 Stone walls (visible material) 06 Stucco roof 02B Shingle other 13 Glass Narrative Description (® SEE CONTINUATION SHEETS WHICH MUST BE COMPLETED) 8. Statement of Sinnlftcance e vpuoaura nationar Kegrsier erneria (Mark')' representing your opinion of eligibility after applying relevant. National Register criteria) ® Yes ❑ No ❑ More Research Recommended A Property is associated with significant events. ® Yes ❑ No ❑ More Research Recommended B Property is associated with the lives of significant persons. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ More Research Recommended C Property has distinctive architectural characteristics. 0 Yes ❑ No 0 More Research Recommended D Property yields significant information in archaeology or history. County Johnson Address 914 S. Dubuoue Site Number 52-05284 City Iowa Ci District Number Criteria Considerations ❑ A Owned by a religious institution or used ❑ E A reconstructed building, object, or structure. for religious purposes. ❑ F A commemorative property. ❑ B Removed from its original location. ❑ G Less than 50 years of age or achieved significance within the past ❑ C A birthplace or grave. 50 years. ❑ D A cemetery Areas of Significance (Enter categories from instructions) 29 Social History 14B Black Significant Person (Complete if National Register Criterion B is marked above) Tate. Elizabeth Significant Dates Construction date 1880 ❑ check if circa or estimated date Other dates, including renovation Architect/Builder Architect Builder Narrative Statement of Significance (® SEE CONTINUATION SHEETS WHICH MUST BE COMPLETED) 9. Major Bibliographical References u woe w,,e- seen, wr urauons or me 000Ks articles, and other sources used in preparing this form 10. Geographic Data UTM References (OPPONAL) Zone Eastnag Northing Zone EasOng Northing — 2 3 _ 4 — —_ ❑ See continuation sheet for additional UTM references or comments 11. Form Prepared By organization Friends of Historic Preservation date 06/2014 street & number P.O. Box 2001 telephone 515-368-1242 city or town Iowa City state IA zip code 52244 ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION (Submit the following items with the completed form) FOR ALL PROPERTIES 1. Map: showing the property's location in a town/city or township. 2. Site plan: showing position of buildings and structures on the site in relation to public road(s). 3. Photographs: representative black and white photos. If the photos are taken as part of a survey for which the Society is to be curator of the negatives or color slides, a photo/catalog sheet needs to be included with the negatives/slides and the following needs to be provided below on this particular inventory site: Roll/slide sheet # Frame/slot # Date Taken Roll/slide sheet # Frame/slot # Date Taken _ Roll/slide sheet # Frame/slot It Date Taken _ ❑ See continuation sheet or attached photo & slide catalog sheet for list of photo roll or slide entries. ❑ Photosrillustmtions without negatives are also in this site inventory file. FOR CERTAIN KINDS OF PROPERTIES, INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING AS WELL 1. Farmstead & District: (List of structures and buildings, known or estimated year built, and contributing or noncontributing status) 2. Bain: a. A sketch of the frame/truss configuration in the form of drawing a typical middle bent of the bam. b. A photograph of the loft showing the frame configuration along one side. State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) Use Only Below This Line Concur with above survey opinion on National Register efig�bilty ©Yes ❑ No More Research Recommended ❑ This is a locally designated property or part of a locally designated district. Comments, Evaluated by (name4itle) Date Iowa Department of Cultural Affairs State Historical Society of Iowa Site Number Iowa Site Inventory Form Continuation Sheet of Property 7. Description Site Number 52-05284 Related District Number Neighborhood: The house is bounded by the Iowa River to the west and Ralston Creek to the east, and the CRANDIC Railroad and Iowa Interstate Railroad lines to the north. The large lot across the street from the Tate Arms is occupied by the Johnson County Administration building. The area including and immediately surrounding the former Tate Arms is zoned for intensive commercial uses. Historically, the Tate Arms was located in an industrial zone. According to Sanborn Fire Insurance maps from 1926 to 1944, some operations in the area included a junkyard, a warehouse, and outhouses. Sanborn Fire Insurance maps from 1933 to 1944 show a stock yard, garage and repair shop, coal yard, junk yard, bulk oil storage, and filling stations in the area. The National Guard Armory was a buffer between the Tate Arms and a sewage disposal plant, sewage pump, and bulk oil storage station. African -American residents lived next door to the Tate Arms house at 916 S. Dubuque Street. Local chapters of Kappa Alpha Psi (founded in 1914) and Alpha Phi Alpha (founded in 1922) fraternities, which provided room and board to African -American students, were located nearby at 301 and 818 S. Dubuque Street and other locations in the neighborhood. Architectural features: The house at 914 S. Dubuque Street was built in 1880. It has two stories with a hipped roof and white stucco walls that cover the original brick. It has a stone foundation, and windows throughout the house are largely double hung with exterior light blue shutters and brick sills. There is 2,356 square feet of total living area (1,178 per floor). The total lot contains 7,800 square feet. There are 10 rooms above ground, five bedrooms and a full basement but no attic. There is one full bathroom. On the west elevation (facing Dubuque Street) is a 424-square-foot wrap -around veranda with a concrete floor and tapered, concrete cast pillars. The ground floor features a large 12-pane picture frame window that appears to be original and a doorway that is currently boarded up. On the second floor are two double hung sash windows. The veranda wraps around to the north elevation, which, on the ground floor, features another 12-pane window, a doorway, and two more double hung sash windows. On the second floor is a single -pane diamond -shaped window and two double hung sash windows. Also on the north elevation is a port coch6re (carriage porch) supported by tapered, concrete cast pillars. The east elevation, which faces Ralston Creek, features seven double hung sash windows — symmetrically placed on the ground floor and asymmetrically placed on the second floor. Also on this side of the house is a large parking lot. The south elevation features six double hung sash windows similar to those on the east elevation and one smaller three -over -one double hung sash window on the second floor. Iowa Department of Cultural Affairs State Historical Society of Iowa Site Number Site Number 52-05284 Iowa Site Inventory Form Related District Number Continuation Sheet Tate Arms Johnson Name of Property County 914 S._ Dubuque Iowa City Address City 8. Significance Significant to Iowa City history and culture: The Tate Arms, owned by Junious "Bud" Tate and Elizabeth "Bettye" Crawford Tate, served as a boarding house for African -American students before they were allowed to live on campus at the University of Iowa. The Tate Arms operated from 1939 to 1963 and was one of five boarding houses in Iowa City for black students. Immediately after the Tates moved into the 914 S. Dubuque Street house, they started renting to African -American students. Bettye Tate told reporter Jean Florman in a November 1995 article that the 12-room house was too big for the Tates and their son, Dennis. "She bought beds (including three 'double-deckers'), two dozen desks, and 20 bookcases, and hung a sign over the front porch with the name, 'Tate Arms,"' wrote Florman. "'...There were all these boys coming to town needing a place to stay," Tate told Florman. "'When they were accepted into college, the university would send them a list of places where they were allowed to live. I was on that list.'" Tate told a reporter from the Community News Advertiser in August 1995 that they started renting rooms due to student need. "Where else would they go?" Tate said. The Community News Advertiser article said the Tates put "double-decker bunks in many of the rooms and charged about $10 a month in rent." The Tate Arms housed up to 20 tenants at a time (Iowa Women's Archive). Boarders stayed fall and spring semesters and over most of the summer. "At holidays we usually had 12 or 14 people around the dinner table because most of them couldn't afford to go home," Tate said in the November 1995 Iowa City Magazine article. Housing was a huge concern for African -American students during this time. An article by Richard Breaux in the spring 2002 issue of Iowa Heritage Illustrated, titled "Facing Hostility, Finding Housing: African -American Students at the University of Iowa, 1920s-1950s," begins by quoting a letter from an African -American law student at Iowa named William Edwin Taylor to James Weldon Johnson of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People. "The conditions in this city are at present almost unlivable for a colored student. The attitude of hostility is felt most keenly in the matter of housing. No one will rent to colored fraternities and no one will sell in a livable locality," Taylor wrote. The article discussed how a local property owner had terminated a contract with Taylor's Kappa Alpha Psi fraternity when local members of the Ku Klux Klan organized to outbid the black students. "There is an organization of the Ku Klux Klan here, and I have not the least doubt that they are financing the scheme to affect our ruin," Taylor wrote to Johnson (Breaux 2002). Another article in the spring 2002 issue of Iowa Heritage Illustrated, this one by Anne Beiser Allen, detailed the purchase of the house at 942 Iowa Avenue by the Iowa Association of Colored Women's Clubs for a group of female African -American students attending the University of Iowa in 1919. By that time, University of Iowa enrollment had reached 4,000. Currier Hall, the first dormitory built by the university (in 1913), housed fewer than 200 women and no African -Americans. African -American women had rented rooms from members of Iowa City's small African -American community or professors in exchange for menial labor. Through a statewide fundraising campaign orchestrated by the Iowa Association of Colored Women's Clubs and publicity from the Bystander newspaper, enough money had been raised to purchase the two-story house at 942 Iowa Avenue, located about nine Iowa Department of Cultural Affairs State Historical Society of Iowa Site Number Site Number 52-05284 Iowa Site Inventory Form Related District Number Continuation Sheet Tate Arms Johnson Name of Property County 914 S. Dubuque Iowa City Address City blocks from campus, for $5,300 and $1,000 down payment. The initiative was endorsed by university officials, although no real assistance from the university was delivered. There was some resistance to the purchase from the neighborhood property owners. "There had been some opposition from neighbors, who managed to force a reassessment of a small adjoining lot where a garage stood, but the committee arranged to pay the additional tax," Allen wrote (Allen 2002). Black students were not allowed to live in University of Iowa dormitories until 1946, although the University of Iowa had no official rule on the matter —only that the Deans of Men and Women believed that white students would object to the arrangement (Breaux 1998). It was be student sentiment that would later lead to a change in the unwritten policy. The University of Iowa's decision to desegregate student housing was done quietly, according to the September 26, 1999 Gazette article. Professor emeritus Phillip Hubbard told the Gazette reporter that students retuming from service in World War II were less tolerant of segregated housing. "'The white students wouldn't have tolerated that policy in the university,'" Hubbard said. "'They were very civil rights oriented at that period. Whatever the students wanted —that's kind of how it was.'" As the residence halls became more integrated, demand for the boarding houses declined. The Tate Arms was the last to close, in 1963. However, off -campus housing was still an issue in the early 1960s, as evidenced by an investigation by the University Committee on Human Rights (established in 1963) into discrimination in off -campus housing, fraternities and sororities, according to the "African -American Experience" pamphlet. Associated with the lives of persons significant in our past Elizabeth "Bettye" Crawford Tate was born in Fairfield, Iowa in 1906. Following high school graduation and after working for a year in Lake Okoboji, she married Junious "Bud" Tate in the 1930s. The couple moved to Iowa City, where Bud operated a janitorial service for downtown businesses. The Tates were one of the few African -American families living in Iowa City in the 1930s, according to a biographical note in the Elizabeth "Bettye' Crawford Tate papers held in the Iowa Women's Archives. Bettye Tate was a leader and active member in the Iowa City community. In addition to opening up her home for black university students for nearly thirty years, Tate worked at the University of Iowa Hospital's cardiovascular lab for 22 years, starting out as a clinical technician and retiring as supervisor in 1976. Tate was a charter member of the Iowa City Community Theatre and served on the board of directors, as well as performed in several theatrical productions. Many of the former residents at Tate Arms went on to successful careers. Former boarders Bradshaw and William Shoecraf Wood attributed the success rate among boarders at the Tate Arms to Bettye Tate's discipline. "'With her everything was not an obstacle,'" Bradshaw said in the August 1995 Community News Examiner article. "'She saw that you got out there and went face-to-face with the world."' Bradshaw earned a Master's degree in health and physical education. Wood earned a law degree and was a judge in the Chicago area.. Tate High School in Iowa City is named after Elizabeth Tate. Iowa Department of Cultural Affairs State Historical Society of Iowa Site Number Site Number 52-05284 Iowa Site Inventory Form Related District Number Continuation Sheet Tate Arms Johnson Name of Property County 914 S. Dubuque _ _ Iowa City Address City Has yielded or may likely yield information important in history: While much attention has been given to the historical and cultural significance of the Tate Arms as a boarding house for black university students between the 1930s and 1960s, it is likely that the significance of this house goes back even farther. The house at 914 S. Dubuque Street was used for lodging at least as early as 1928, when it was owned by Joseph Williams and was listed in the Iowa City Directory as the "Williams Hotel" (Breaux 1998). More research on this house may reveal even more information about Iowa City's past. Conclusion: In addition to being in line with the goals set forth in the Iowa City Historic Preservation Plan, the Tate Arms building meets the following criteria used by the City of Iowa City Historic Preservation Commission to determine if a property should be eligible for landmark status: 1) significant to Iowa City history and culture; 2) associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history; 3) associated with the lives of persons significant in our past; and 4) has yielded or may likely yield information important in history. A Statement of Historical Significance, prepared by Richard Breaux, concludes with the following quote from the August 1995 Community News Examiner article: "Despite the historical value of this area to Iowa and African -American history, 'the small houses which dotted the west side of Ralston Creek from Benton Street to Kirkwood Avenue, have been removed to provide parking for the businesses that replaced the families who lived there."' Breaux states that the Tate Arms building deserves the same treatment as other sites dedicated to African -American history across the state. The role of the Tate Arms in facilitating the integration of African -American residents into the Iowa City community and state of Iowa deserves recognition similar to other historic landmarks. There has been criticism of historic preservation that it needs to be more inclusive, and it seems that if the criteria for determining which structures should be saved are based solely on elements of style, those who could not afford to live in high -style houses will be forgotten. The Tate Arms is one of the last remaining homes in what was traditionally a small black neighborhood in Iowa City and should be recognized as a local landmark. Researched and written by Andrew Bassman. Edited by Erica Blair. Used with permission. Iowa Department of Cultural Affairs State Historical Society of Iowa Site Number Site Number 52-05284 Iowa Site Inventory Form Related District Number Continuation Sheet Tate Arms Johnson Name of Property County 914 S. Dubuque _ Iowa Cfii Address City 9. Major Bibliographical References Allen, Anne Beiser. "Sowing Seeds of Kindness —and Change: A History of the Iowa Association of Colored Women's Clubs." Iowa Heritage Illustrated, Spring 2002. State Historical Society of Iowa, Iowa City, IA. Breaux, Richard M. "Facing Hostility, Finding Housing: African -American Students at the University of Iowa, 1920s-1950s." Iowa Heritage Illustrated, Spring 2002. State Historical Society of Iowa, Iowa City, IA. Florman, Jean. "The Arms of Betty Tate." Iowa City Magazine. November 1995. Iowa City, IA. Gersema, Emily. `Dorms off limits." Cedar Rapids Gazette, September 26, 1999. Cedar Rapids, IA. Iowa Women's Archive. "Elizabeth 'Bettye' Crawford Tate Papers." University of Iowa Libraries. Iowa City, IA. Schreiber, Linda. "Housemother Sets Rules." Community News Advertiser. August 16, 1995. Coralville, IA. University of Iowa Libraries, 'The African -American Experience at the University of Iowa." February 1990. Iowa City, IA. Iowa Department of Cultural Affairs State Historical Society of Iowa Site Number Site Number 52-05284 Iowa Site Inventory Form Related District Number Continuation Sheet Tate Arms Johnson Name of Property County 914 S. Dubuque owa 1:... Address City Additional Documentation ILI r�l -1 j _ - :yam rocs F21 RE F;Z 1 7 T j L EN M . . A jj ILL .1 9 1 T Position of buildings and structures on the site in relation to public roads (Johnson County Assessor) Iowa Department of Cultural Affairs State Historical Society of Iowa Site Number Site Number 52-05284 Iowa Site Inventory Form Related District Number Continuation Sheet Tate Arms Johnson Name of Property County 914 S. Dubucue _ lowa City Address City J View of the house facing Dubuque (west elevation) View of the port coch6re (north elevation) Iowa Department of Cultural Affairs State Historical Society of Iowa Site Number Site Number 52-05284 Iowa Site Inventory Form Related District Number Continuation Sheet Tate Arms Johnson Name of Property County 914 S. Dubuque _ Iowa Ci Address City Side view of house before brick was covered. A q A Photo of 914 S. Dubuque Street from 1947 (Iowa Women's Archive, Tate papers) Iowa Department of Cultural Affairs State Historical Society of Iowa Site Number Site Number 52-05284 Iowa Site Inventory Form Related District Number Continuation Sheet Tate Arms Johnson Name of Property County 914 S. Dubuque Iowa City Address City Illustration of the Tate Arms from an invitation to Bettye Tate's 90th birthday celebration on June 22, 1996 (Iowa Women's Archive, Tate papers) Another illustration of the Tate Arms from an invitation to Bettye Tate's 90th birthday celebration on June 22, 1996 (Iowa Women's Archive, Tate papers) Iowa Department of Cultural Affairs State Historical Society of Iowa Site Number Iowa Site Inventory Form Continuation Sheet Name of Property Lh E.BENTON Sanborn Fire Insurance Map: 1926 i W. T[N'MI . � •iMqu 5 i Sanborn Fire Insurance Map: 1933-1944 Site Number 52-05284 Related District Number -_^,,ter � •,S \?� .y1 n �•rr+ + . rr,itM, .13 i/ Sanborn Fire Insurance Map: 1933-1944 Iowa Department of Cultural Affairs State Historical Society of Iowa Site Number Iowa Site Inventory Form Continuation Sheet Name of Property QIA a M..k......,. Address TATE , TRIMS Site Number 52-05284 Related District Number The Most Modern ,n., Convenieru Hong A vriy Frorn Kam FU R University Students ifl low', City Approved by S.Lt 1. `k 2 sutl, Df�uque Street Undated advertisement for Tate Arms (Iowa Women's Archive, Tate papers) I TA.3`E.F' RNIS 'Ple Mc.st Modern and t.nnvenient Home FOR Negro Students in Iowa City 914 South Dubuque Street Undated advertisement for Tate Arms (Iowa Women's Archive, Tate papers) Iowa Department of Cultural Affairs State Historical Society of Iowa Site Number Site Number 52-05284 Iowa Site Inventory Form Related District Number Continuation Sheet Tate Arms Johnson Name of Property County 914 S. Dubuque Iowa City Address City Our View C,cnsertsus of" keess-[ ftm "twill hoard Ar ms ms 1111US C be rewg ed ras Y�n)cars ago, tshep ldadrrss of t;w Inu:+Citr Crmtrntmity Set"I Difttin:were em-idcring • na its for the new facility d:e d}.ctWl's f-1h%rwti:e h!glt sahoad program, they received hundndn of subaneaiTes. tatheend--rather than elunwmra.eahrtrI j uaaes Lu ttdnmurity Hiah Sc rc«i. River Cutn. ::r tty Hwi l`ct:o,if or Contras,ffighQvlwwl-- YOUR VIEW the eistrnrd tsisnly JKAe' to 'want, tb� rchoolafler ou. reken fw, u• iho 1160t "Benve" Tate (19j& a ays; W$)'Ata,mrnreseit,elacst m aaan who. back in the mid _'r0ihceritury, had opcne d Iav hame.,t 91.1 S lJt tiunun St, W otilege-ege bla* stdaLeas tttw v:::re tart allawed to live to t1w Crai'.•Crsity rd Iuwa's student doming, 7kte also was being reCupt,.i-st•d tan her nark to the 1:1 tlo+pitals and Ciin4;s' a utliut asculrr lah. Thsatrn. But it p.•tix+adr;'.y wt,e f,;r txx to eteate a heare•a.ray--M,.n !ianuc tar G3 t,ha-k siur7t,nts in a rmesrtiad to hrara•'tLtd's'c+gacy. ' :She was a mn4�l+rf thN wen calae s amd nur sign of the adteatwti; o hia;it sctttwl "rhea ticttnoi B.mrd President iauren Rea e as .l of the time, 'Mv foRlod oan she was a teen-roue0olamibut;satr- 'stiCsheen. She dMI ndiedthe Ad+ea4tny andLh•: a.piritofthe whool" Fast il'rx d tct WeAY, and the Tc U- Arm= --The ha,lnu ad 914 S. rkd)uq a St. twt E:1 ob,th I'Lte and hnr NO and Bud hail upmed fr„m tie 1a20s to rue 19Ws —Stands empty :vithplp+vond o',tirthe door I ocated ast,at•theaohnson County AJnutti.,n•tdlt a amid ng, lhn cettn l V[tw Iwute r. a said m btnrrh altaak ;vita anet;ddt,.n•Sr :ao-ant lot ral,2 S 1)ot Fugue Et; andueigMor ":ng uu+ptr offk•e houmni I'Jut has been str,Ppednf rlt is sf<fog(2+ti E. Brn- tun St.. nsrrl t't:a 1•�:A;mfc va.ur. cd'*h.; S. nru — wt;i; hstr.� twee the mbd-'tct ref merernr t vpm-!a, tac:.eN and hxal history Protects..And „tvm thut the Struc- tt0•e is k,csatd In tr elKlt-!rrftlst+ Cmsenag District, the city- has made availablouc. mere.rtortrituatc- inxand otter incentives farmy devrtopwin- tcrt,ated to nm-an T ing the. Itrnneriv F.t_'f over the decades, ao+me has filed thepnpte-aurk h, bave the TateArins be gran:;d Iondwark vmtus:m a c;ty; Iitatc ornaticauil level. That mwas,shtuidtbzreww.ina s"de to demolish the property. the unly warning the city N•<,uWfavewould be' hert putIforadondiVt permit-. which %kes ahtnrt Seim days to procr ,_s. Audeyearifocittw.group wt'Te'w move quicKay to file such atnapplicaiva to ITrowet a butidi gof such obvleas M."("•Ie vadue, it normal- ly would talu:, nuitatet IcT the reiesttnmo%e throttgh the itisto: icYr,�ect vatttm Cuumtission and the Mamvii I and X ming C'rnmnft m. befvrre the Sour,,:A wound set arutiiuhea tug*n cvnstdor. theapph atsor. tf the request Awland:;oaa stmuswereehal- kmged by the cvrrezicamara — it uenerit:ally- natned hunted lial i ity ia!mpanywithties tom.; hrt:ad owpany,AwnnenNDtmm-)i%n—then gt".aathtg amok a desiavatfim w+ndd tetiuire a su• permaltsity, of Nis out of Ise seven ci:T cuuocil- err. We dan t lux.w what thoplans um for the Tate Atntsand the otl*er prcpertiec Our rr lanrrer`+ ea&' lust week tnAparrrutttt"Ilmnmtmvn sel tht I.7,C§:+epras�uttirtKut<_ut•rey.lt>tlivllaa@, tevrn natratnt ned. Aial an LLC is not It gayly reluired to dieckv a its mernbern ur benelaaom. But we:lo knew the Taw hems Y,,Vroswus un itreplecra:hle ivak I as impralatnt chspter of lo•xu Cty hishtty. And rmyrewoIng and devek,pment of the propertynodsha.incWethe Int%ci atkat land bopefnliy ra turation? of this idsttuic t+trta Sa we ant*e the. ay to eapee-i-,c Ihe;xtnrerns of hav- iI:q tii,+, rrgr_*toy be:ng =er,' dI rd a Loral landmark. As historian ranOlivt-Fuilnotedinacm-t croh:mn.laatwcrk,:.7�:a>a:rt11,s ldghly eigua"cant and vStiblophysicalretuindcr of err Aw.1, if checl m,W, Peet is n dhfng ehott+If tragic, 7hde- molishthe building for redeveie+l,tncr:t would be narbing short of ihamefulsndEto.• mghtod•" TO CONTAiCT US 'cW, fupa M acrtisi to oo,nKr4oa IrtZet:xm. .A]- imYude:. nar. e, aadr F enJ OYVto,c yraae rv,^.Car (tNiq g+:ur n. and a[rwli be wired) .Ttatdl: a•ed-tmVe.s%r!erktlit:ury ".ert Jpntf Sri nWe. Article by the Press -Citizen Editorial Board, June 8, 2014 Staff Report August 8, 2014 Historic Review for 220 E. Jefferson Street District: Jefferson Street Historic District Classification: National Register, Local Landmark, and Key Contributing in district T he applicant, Jon Ozeroff, is requesting approval for a proposed aheratiou project at 220 E. Jefferson Street, a National Register listed property, Local Landmark, and Key Contributing property in the Jefferson Street Historic District. The project consists of the replacement of existing windows in the rectory house. Applicable Regidations and Guidelines 4.0 Iowa City Historic Preservation Guidelines for Alterations 4.13 Windows Staff Comments St. Mary's Rectory (1891) was listed on the National register of historic places in February 1980 as a part of the St. Mary's Church nomination. The rectory is a hip roof rectangular structure of frame construction with brick veneer. It features a two story bay with polygonal roof on the right side of the fagade and an arched porch across the rest. These round arches echo the arched fenestration of the neighboring church. The rectory appears to be basically unaltered. As a National Register site it is considered to be a Key Structure in the Jefferson Street Historic District. The proposed project consists of the replacement of existing windows with Pella Architect Series aluminum clad wood windows. With the exception of two decorative leaded glass windows on the front of building, all twenty eight windows on the first and second floors are proposed to be replaced. The existing windows are larger and a higher grade compared to typical residential windows. The exterior trim includes a rounded brick mold that appears to compliment a larger version found on the windows of St. Mary's Church, which is located adjacent to the rectory. The guidelines recommend repair of historic windows before replacement is considered. The applicant must demonstrate deterioration of the existing windows before replacement is approved. If it is determined that the existing windows are deteriorated to the extent that replacement should be considered, then new sashes which are the same type and size as the existing windows and match the sash width, trim, divided lites, and overall appearance of the historic windows are required. Staff visited the rectory with the applicant and viewed a sampling of the windows. No signs of deterioration such as wood rot, warping, or water damage were observed. With the exception of broken sash cords, which are easily repairable, the windows appeared to be in overall good condition. Some routine maintenance including painting and putty repair may be necessary. The applicant expressed a concern about ease of window operation. Replacement of the sash cords so that they are reattached to the weights and using bee's wax on the channels on the sides of the windows would make them operate smoothly. That, with repair and caulking of the storm windows, would likely be more cost effective than window replacement. On June 27, four Commission members and a staff representative were allowed to inspect the windows, both outside and inside the house. Conditions observed included peeling exterior paint, upper sash that have been painted shut, missing/failed glazing putty, broken sash cords, and original interior wood finish that has been damaged by years of sun exposure. The windows with the most sun damage are on the west side of the house. All of the conditions observed appear to be maintenance items that require proper repair but do not justify window replacement. With regard to storm windows, the existing non -historic aluminum combination storm windows are over thirty years old according to the Church's Property Management Commission. These storms have functional problems and the proposed work includes their removal. Note that Historic Review is not required for the installation or removal of storm windows. Staffs opinion remains the same as stated in the initial report: that the applicant has not documented deterioration to the extent that windows should be replaced. If the applicant is able to provide documentation that some of the window sashes are deteriorated and not repairable then replacement sashes, which match the sash width, trim and overall appearance of the historic windows, may be considered for those windows. This approach would minimize the loss of historic material in this significant Landmark building. Staff recommends repair of the existing historic windows by an experienced craftsperson/contractor, following accepted preservation standards. Staff further recommends installation of new combination storm windows, sized to fit inside the distinctive rounded brick mold trim. New storm windows, properly installed, will improve the overall energy efficiency of the building envelope, while protecting the historic windows from the elements. Recommended Motion Move to that deny a Certificate of Appropriateness for the replacement of twenty eight windows at 220 E. Jefferson Street. r rr t ` 1 + T� � ✓ 1s r. •A! � � a' rf ��1 plyy q � • _ r� i. Vi hd ow of We4 f 4;` t� nA. rA j&)iVt flA) C1.t Weit-e -air- `a►uii+�r. Application for alterations to the historic landmarks or properties located in a historic district or conservation district pursuant to Iowa City Code Section 144C. Guidelines for the Historic Review process, explanation of the process and regulations can be found in the Iowa City Historic Preservation Handbook, which is available in the PCD office at City Hall or online at: www.icgov.org/HPhandbook For Staff Use: s Date submitted: ° / oV-/ ❑ Certificate ofNo material Effect ❑ Certificate of Appropriateness ❑ Majorreview ❑ intermediate review ❑ Minor review The HPC does not review applications for compliance with building and zoning codes. Work must comply with all appropriate codes and be reviewed by the building division prior to the issuance of a building permit. Meeting Schedule: The HPC meets the second Thursday of each month. Applications are due in the PCD office by noon on Wednesday three weeks prior to the meeting. See attached document for application deadlines and meeting dates. Property Owner/Appticant Information Morse Orckls Ycaoaetpmon) . Q Property Owner Name: ::5 'T_ P-i A 12 t9 '*S C AT H O L I C G H Lt 2 e 4 Email: W uJ iy . t G SYinck r !A , ny;g Phone Number:(? /4) 3 3 7 - e/ 5 J Address: 22 0 g 5E fit' E/2 Sties a 'S"�- City: SO W A C 1 T `t State: Zip Code: 6- 2 2 4 Contractor / Consultant Name: SlA C GkiC,T rZ LA a- / [#1 �' T tI) C Email:. \� 07.e ,r n-C C W 9� ,c_0r phone Number: (3 (9 % '5k j - ®l/ h 17 Address: a; N a P— V--1 A rJ 6 Li City: I-- O W 4 e— 1" -` 1 State: r-: Zip Code: '5 2 2. Y 4 Proposed Project Information Address: .1,20 ¢ t' FF5 2 e3lo S l Tnw1q c li 4. 5-2'Z"l9-- Use of Property: ST. M 1) tZ W lp f t? e TO R tl Date Constructed (if known): Historic Designation !Maps Are loamedin Uu 1%tom, Pmservsnon Handbook) ❑ This property is a local historic landmark. OR ❑ This Property is within a historic or conservation district (choose location): ❑ Brown Street Historic District ❑ Clark Street Conservation District ❑ College Green Historic District ❑ College Hill Conservation District ❑ East College Street Historic District ❑ Dearborn Street Conservation District ❑ Nyyrthside Historic District ❑ Cmvemor-Lucas Street Conservation District Ut-7efferson Street Historic District ❑ Longfellow Historic District ❑ Summit Street Historic District ❑ Woodlawn Historic District Within the district, this property is classified as: 13 Contributing 0 Noncontributing 13 Nonhistoric Applicatit u Requkemmts Choose appropriate project type. In order to ensure application can be processed, please include all listed materials. Applications without necessary materials may be rejected. ❑ Addttion (Typically projects entailing an addition to the building footprint such as a room, porch, deck, etc.) ❑ Building Elevations ❑ Flom Plans ❑ Photographs ❑ Product Information ❑ Site Plans Alteration (Typically projects entailing work such as siding and window replacement, skylights, window opening alterations, deck or porch replacement/construction, baluster repair, or similar. If the project is a minor alteration, photographs and drawings to describe the scope of the project are sufficient) ❑ Building Elevations QrPhotDgmpbs q Product Information ❑ Construction of new building ❑ Building Elevations ❑ Floor Plans Photographs ❑ Product Information ❑ Site Plans ❑ Demolition (Projects entailing the demolition of aprimary structure or outbuilding, or any portion of a building, such as porch, chimney, decorative trim, baluster, etc.) ❑ Photographs ❑ Proposal of Furore Plans Rely or restoration of an existing structure that will not change its appearance. ❑ Photographs ❑ Other: ❑ Product Information Please contact the Preservation Planner at 356-5243 for materials which need to be included with application. Proposed Project Details Project Description: 1PLACX3 a V1-TI hi (°, w 1Ajf4Bw g � lTH -PE LIN- 6°T!\1'ERe Ff 1Tt N:T N✓'EP— I Se. ALLtM Id/ter tt.t a LA L WDaZ ER—%firiUtg- 11)Itu'ODO5_ ( IRE e-To2t-i � Materials to be Used: -P F� 1_ L A Yet A C. N 1 c_ r S 12 1V7 g UJ i t�') s tuS Exterior Appearance Changes: &-'i O N-= C- S.'TM\HistP,rss\app_for_histwi. miew.doc 12/13 Staff Report August 8, 2014 Historic Review for 514 S. Lucas Street District: Govemor-Lucas Conservation District Classification: Non -Historic The applicant, Apartments at U of I, LC, is requesting approval for a proposed alteration project at 514 S. Lucas Street, a non -historic property in the Governor -Lucas Conservation District. The project consists of the removal of the existing mansard roof, and construction of a new 4:12 pitched hip roof. Applicable Regulations and Guidelines 4.0 Iowa City Historic Preservation Guidelines for Alterations 4.11 Siding 9.0 Iowa City Historic Preservation Guidelines for Multi -Family Budld*s 9.2 Architectural Elements Staff Comments This 2,048 square foot multifamily dwelling was built in 1972 according to the Iowa City Assessor's records. The building consists of three stories and 12 units. The lot is approximately 12,000 square feet and is surrounded primarily by owner occupied single-family homes as well as student rental housing. This building is characteristic of the symmetrical Mansard style, as identified in Virginia Savage McAlester's 2013 edition of A Field Guide to American Houses. This is a 20th Century style that was popular from the late 1950's through the 1970's. It was popular for apartment buildings and small-scale commercial buildings as well as single-family houses, and it could be a relatively inexpensive style to build. This building is wood frame construction on a reinforced concrete foundation, the siding is vinyl clapboard, and the original style -defining mansard roof — currently being demolished — has large shake shingles on the exposed sides. The project consists of the removal of the existing mansard roof, and construction of a new 4:12 pitched hip roof. Proposed new materials include vinyl siding, aluminum soffit and fascia, and Class A fiberglass shingles. The project also includes a new hip roof canopy over the front door, supported by square columns. As this building is classified non -historic, the guidelines for siding allow consideration of synthetic siding. In this case, the proposed synthetic, non -wood materials include the vinyl siding and the aluminum soffit and fascia. In Staffs opinion, this building meets the conditions for approval of the synthetic materials: this is not an architecturally significant building and the use of these materials will not detract from the building's appearance or worth. While the guidelines for multi -family buildings are intended for new construction, they are applicable in this case due to the extensive amount of work involved and the proposed transformation of the building appearance. Specifically, this section has applicable requirements for entrances and for building roofline. Entrances on multi -family buildings must be clearly demarcated, and one way of achieving this is with a covered porch or canopy as proposed for this building. The roofline of a multi -family building should reflect the predominate roof type, orientation, scale and pitch of existing buildings within the neighborhood. In this case, the proposed new roof will be a better fit with the historic houses in the Govemor-Lucas district. In Staffs opinion, the proportions of the proposed front porch appear too small and too simplified for the scale and new look of the building. The front porch needs to be more substantial, with more traditional details. This would include more substantial columns, addition of a cornice beam between columns and roof, and traditional baluster details. The proportions of the proposed dormer in the center of the new roof are also in need of some adjustment to fit with the proportions of the new roof. Recommended Motion Move to approve a Certificate of Appropriateness for the proposed project at 514 S. Lucas Street, as presented in the application, with the following condition: ■ Provide final design of front elevation, with revised porch and roof dormer, for review and approval by Chair and staff. liar��• .•Af� 4� ' h��'r ,�Y • ~ 1 g r ,.lid $Ji' c IMLL r<iK — fin' ll f11 r l 61- Application for alteranoas to the historic landmarks or properties located in a historic district or conservation district pursuant to Iowa City Code Section 14-4C. Guidelines for the Historic Review process, explitnation of the process and regulations can be found in the Iowa 01), Hislorio l'rerervanon Handbook which is available in the Neighborhood and Development Services office at City hall or online at www tegov org/BPhandbook For StaffUse� �1/ u Date subintued: / i 0 i—Lt ❑ Certificate of No material Effect Certificate of Appropiiateaess ❑ Maiorrcview• ❑ Intannediste review ❑ Mmurmem The HPC does not review applications for compliance with building and zoning codes. Work must comply with all appropriate codes and be reviewed by the building division prior to the issuance of a building permit. Meeting Sehednle; The HPC meets the second Thursday of each month. Applications are due in the office of Neighborhood and Development Services by noon on Wednesday thiee weeks prior to Ltte meet+ng, See attached document for application deadlines and meeting dates. Property Owner/Applicantinformatitiia . .. ,. ,.(Plw+eaha¢ipYimarY ca�1pdco� 'I - •. . ❑ Property Owner Nome ?1Pr,r+ww A+ (d i- r LL Email: jekfMC 1�q-73 4*i'P ring tr ri PhemeNumber (31Y) (es31- lkrr,i Address_ ;SS S C : tl0. rt St City: -xO,,j4, C_ l State. 'IA 'Lip Code. 912vS ❑ Contractor / consultant Name: -18 �f r Ir. r Ic Final l:.jaffnsicu3a�,,.h" p.to:,.., PhoneNumbet(:3jel)_fo31-teH} Address:356 G. C _: it �.1Sl' City: C44 . State... '.F.t "Lip Code 4i.) tt i Proposed.Projectlnfurmatlow . Address- +i? S Lwt" 54-&t .. UseofPropetiy: %l ,44-fiyri4 Date Coustmcted(Akoown)- I57L H➢etoric Designation . .. fRfapseroTueatcamthciiislois PttaY[vaUanrtyudbtwk) .. ... .. , ❑ 1 his Property is a local historic landmark. OR (� This Property is within a historic or conservation district (choose vocation) ❑ Brown Street Histonc District ❑ Clark Street Conservation Distract College Grew 1&storic District ❑ College HO Coa&anstion Distract ❑ Last College St.eet listoric District ❑ Dearbom Street Conservation Dwiiot ❑ LonglOvw Aistoiic District ❑ Crousctuwn;HoeaceMani CenscnaUon Disirw, ❑ Nordmdc ffistoric District Covemor-Lucas Street Consemahon Asuiut II Sunann-Suvet lbstone ➢isn:ct ❑ Woodlawn Historic Dwiia Willis) the district, thus Property is classified as: 11 emnbuong 0 Noncunttibutiug 2 ,I Aorio .Application Requirements Choose appropuate pto)ect type tit trcder to eitsule application inn be processed, please include all listed materials Apphcation%without nmcssat y materiakc maybe miecied. Addibact (ryp tally projects entailing an addition to the building focipma such as s root. porch, desk, CM) ❑ Building Elevation ❑ Floor Plans ❑ .Photographs ❑ Ptodutt Iidbntudiou ❑ Site Plain 19 ratio Cryp;cally prolc.:ts mtadiitework such % siding and wtodow replactmmt, skylrglas� window opening alMrauons, deck or porch teplacemenLLwnsuiictiun,baluster repay, or smiilar If the proqu.t is a minor alteration, photigraphs and drawings to drauibe the scope of tho punted ate suffiuont ) ❑ Budding Elrnutions ❑ Photographs ❑ Product hikrmation ❑ Construction of neu building ❑ Bmidmg Glavauvns ❑ Floor Plans ❑ Photogtaphs ❑ Product Information ❑ Sue Plans Demolition (Proiet.ts eniailmg the doimlttion of a primary suucture of outbuilding, or any portion of a blrlduig, such as porch, chimmey, decorative hun, bahistet, etc) ❑ Photographs ❑ Proposal ofFunio, Plans ❑ Reoanor i mtoration of an existing structure that will not change its appearance ❑ Photographs ❑ Productlnfiirmahan ❑ other: Please contact the Preservation Planner at 356-5243 fbr matsitals which need to be included with application Proposed Project )details Project Description: Otdw& lbl MFtd ✓-of., aisAtil Ipdchd ryt ta'M V/.4 �, Sh' TI .hA *11 ✓im.i / f k , •�rN� JhS%(1 Qf'4 NtiNi. tan .{> �/ Ga..id Y2eEl9 /d M<iclr /p„en,- �i+e�i / %u J i Matey Pals to be Used, Exterior Appearance Changes: 1tiltn4�t� t,}.tl f7r Y.CrN6u¢Q t�t1r gtNir I�S,if •l�Ve flAo!'G Dit.itiw �4a� Wsprdapp_ brhiswwvsxiaw.doc 6l4,14 PROPOSED NEW FRONT ELEVATION AT 514 S LUCAS ST PROPOSED NEW SIDE ELEVATION AT 514 S L.UCAS ST 4x4 POST WRAPPED W1 Iv6 Long 1 = 11 111 il PROPOSED NE FRON1 ELEVATION AT 5,14 S. LUCA 6.; Staff Report August 8, 2014 Historic Review for 224 N. Dodge Street District: Goosetown/Horace Mann Conservation District Classification: Contributing The applicant, Keystone Property Management Co., is requesting approval for a proposed demolition project at 224 N. Dodge Street, a Contributing property in the Goosetown/Horace Mann Conservation District. The project consists of the removal of an existing chimney. Applicable Regulations and Guidelines 4.0 Iowa City Historic Preservation Guidelines for Alterations 4.2 Chimneys 7.0 Iowa City Historic Preservation Guidelines for Demolition 7.1 Demolition of Whole Structures or Significant Features Staff Comments This 2-story single-family dwelling was built in 1893 according to the Iowa City Assessor's records. Sanborn maps indicate its construction between 1899 and 1906. It is possible that the house was moved to this location. As originally constructed, this house was an example of a common vernacular house form, the Side - Gabled Two story or I -house form with Queen Anne trim. The house has a moderately pitched side -gable roof with scrollwork trim in the gable ends. The original front porch has been removed. Fenestration includes 1/1 double -hung windows and a bay window on the south facade. The house is set on a limestone foundation and clad in asbestos shingle siding. As part of a roofing project, the applicant is proposing removal of an existing brick chimney. The chimney is prominently visible from the front of the house - located in the center of the main roof ridge, at the intersection with the roof ridge of the rear cross -gable. Unfortunately, this chimney is deteriorating and has recently lost approximately one third of its' original height. Based on conversations with the applicant and contractor, the chimney still functions as a vent for the furnace and the applicant is proposing to replace the chimney with a new metal vent pipe. The guidelines in the Iowa City Historic Preservation Handbook promote preservation of historic chimneys. The guidelines disallow the removal of prominent chimneys that are important to the historic architectural character of the building, and recommend repair and capping of unused historic chimneys. A Certificate of Appropriateness is required for the removal of architecturally significant components, which includes chimneys, on any structure within a conservation or historic district. In staff's opinion, this chimney is important to the historic architectural character of this house. It is prominently visible, symmetrically located, and without this chimney the roof profile is significantly changed. Replacement with an exposed metal vent pipe would be inappropriate. Due to the current deteriorated condition, staff recommends removal of the chimney and reconstruction with materials and dimensions similar to the original. Recommended Motion Move to approve a Certificate of Appropriateness for chimney demolition at 224 N. Dodge Street, as presented in the application, with the following condition: ■ A new chimney will be constructed using materials and dimensions similar to the original chimney, with final design review and approval by Chair and staff. 1 � • r • - 11 � �i� F �lf ..' G �� J r . - � ��/ ' I r,, t i /�.� -� Application for Historic Review Application for alterations to the historic landmarks or properties located in a historic district or conservation district pursuant to Iowa City Code Section 144C. Guidelines for the Historic Review process, explanation of the process and regulations can be found in the Iowa City Historic Preservation Handbook, which is available in the Neighborhood and Development Services office at City Hall or online at: www.icgov.org/BPhandbook For Staff Use: Date submitted: _L/-% Lit ❑ Certificate of No material Effect ❑ Certificate of Appropriateness ❑ Major review ❑ Intermediate review ❑ Minor review The HPC does not review applications for compliance with building and zoning codes. Work must comply with all appropriate codes and be reviewed by the building division prior to the issuance of a building permit. Meeting Schedule: The HPC meets the second Thursday of each month. Applications are due in the office of Neighborhood and Development Services by noon on Wednesday three weeks prior to the meeting. See attached document for application deadlines and meeting dates. Property OM anew ❑ Property Owner Name: &6'r A= Email: Address: 5 r�lt Oi/L City: w e / ❑ Contractor / Consultant Name: Email: Address: /lS d d� l/- //z✓n/,t City: L17 Information Phone Number://) 3�7_ do;W� Proposed Projeet Information Address: as � Al d,34t- Zip Code -SO z 2 yG Use of Property: Date Constructed (if known): Ifistoric Designation (Maps are loused m the Hortonc Prosorwtma Hook) ❑ This Property is a local historic landmark. OR ❑ This Property is within a historic or conservation district (choose location): ❑ Brown Street Historic District ❑ Clark Street Conservation District ❑ College Green Historic District ❑ College Hill Conservation District ❑ East College Street Historic District ❑ Dearborn Street Conservation District ❑ Longfellow Historic District 11 Goosetown / Horace Mann Conservation District ❑ Northside Historic District ❑ Governor -Lucas Street Conservation District ❑ Summit Street Historic District ❑ Woodlawn Historic District Within the district, this Property is classified as: 13 Contributing 0 Noncontributing 0 Nonlustoric Application Requirements Choose appropriate project type. in order to ensure application can be processed, please include all listed materials. Applications without necessary materials may be rejected. ❑ Addition (Typically projects entailing an addition to the building footprint such as a room, porch, deck, etc.) ❑ Building Elevations ❑ Floor Plans ❑ Photographs ❑ Product information ❑ Site Plans ❑ Alteration (Typically projects entailing work such as siding and window replacement, skylights, window opening alterations, deck or porch replacemenUconstruction, baluster repay, or similar. If the project is a minor alteration, photographs and drawings to describe the scope of the project are sufficient.) ❑ Building Elevations ❑ Photographs ❑ Product Information ❑ Construction of new building ❑ Building Elevations ❑ Floor Plans ❑ Photographs ❑ Product Information ❑ Site Plans ❑ Demolition (Projects entailing the demolition of a primary structure or outbuilding, or any portion of a building, such as porch, chimney, decorative trim, baluster, etc.) ❑ Photographs ❑ Proposal of Future Plans ❑ Renair or restoration of an existing structure that will not change its appearance. ❑ Photographs ❑ Product Information ❑ Other: Please contact the Preservation Planner at 356-5243 for materials which need to be included with application. Proposed Project Details Project Description: I'le Il%d� Materials to be Used: Exterior Appearance Changes: mapravapp_>nr_m�rra m.daa 614114 Staff Report I August 8, 2014 Historic Review for 710 Clark Street District: Clark Street Conservation District Classification: Non -Historic The applicant, Kevin Shannon, is requesting approval for a proposed alteration project at 710 Clark Street, a property in the Clark Street Conservation District classified as Non -historic. The project consists of a new front porch, new concrete walks, new patio slabs at the rear of the house and at the detached garage, a new side porch, replacement of basement windows, and replacement of one kitchen window. Applicable Regulations and Guidelines 4.0 Iowa City Historic Preservation Guidelines for Alterations 4.5 Foundations 4.10 Porches 4.13 Windows Staff Comments This single-family dwelling is located in the Longfellow Neighborhood and was built m 1956 according to the Iowa City Assessor's records. This house is surrounded primarily by owner occupied single-family housing. This house is a great example of the Ranch style. Characteristic of this style, it is a single story, with low pitch side -gabled roof with a large overhang that shelters an off -center front entry. The house is small and simple, and with narrow eaves except at the front entry it presents a transition from the Minimal Traditional style. The foundation of this house is concrete block, the siding is horizontal lapped wood, roofing is asphalt shingles. Windows are wood double -hung with horizontal divided lite pattern of 2-over-2. In February 2011, the Commission approved construction of the existing 28' x 30' detached garage — Menards' Design #84597. The COA included demolition of a smaller, deteriorated garage in this location. The proposed project consists of a new front porch, new concrete walks, new patio slabs at the rear of the house and at the detached garage, a new side porch, replacement of basement windows, and replacement of one kitchen window. The existing front porch is a concrete slab which is two steps up from the concrete walk. The proposed plans for the front porch include the addition of a second intermediate slab — one step up from the walk - that `intersects' and matches the look of the existing slab. This may not be what existed originally, but it is very much in keeping with the style of this house. Other proposed work includes a recreation of the decorative support at the left side of the porch. Regarding the proposed replacement of concrete walks around the house, construction of new concrete slabs at the rear of the house and at the detached garage, and a retaining wall in the back yard, Historic Review is not required unless the Building Department determines that a building permit is required. At that time the applicant will need to submit more specific design information for staff review. Regarding the proposed replacement of the side porch, there is not enough information in this application to recommend approval, but it is helpful knowing that this work is anticipated. The new side porch will require Historic Review, and the applicant will need to submit more specific design information for staff review. The existing basement windows are different sizes and styles, and they are all severely deteriorated. The proposed replacement product is a Northview vinyl sliding basement window. The applicant intends to modify the existing openings to make them more uniform, and the proposed windows will match the smaller existing windows. Because this house is classified as Non -historic the vinyl windows are allowed if they match historical proportions. In staffs opinion this product meets the guideline requirements. Note that infill of the foundation wall must match the existing foundation wall materials and construction. The proposed product for replacement of the kitchen window is a Jeld Wen W2500 Series metal clad wood double -hung. The window to be replaced is a single double -hung on the rear (east side) of the house, and it is water damaged and deteriorated. The guidelines state that replacement windows must match the type, size, sash width, trim, use of divided lites, and overall appearance of the historic windows. The Jeld Wen window is an acceptable product. Note here that the new window must match the size of the existing window. For best results, the glass should meet the highest possible rating for Visible Light Transmission (VTL). In staffs opinion the proposed project meets the guidelines of the Iowa City Historic Preservation Handbook and should be approved, with the conditions listed below. Recommended Motion Move to approve a Certificate of Appropriateness for the proposed project at 710 Clark Street, as presented in the application, with the following conditions: • Infill of foundation walls at basement window locations must match the existing foundation walls; • The kitchen replacement window must match the size of the existing window; • Provide final design of side porch for review and approval by Chair and staff; • Provide final design of concrete walks, slabs, and retaining walls for review and approval by Chair and staff if this work is determined to require a building permit. �/�{. �� ^� 4 V sj df 4 10 ma Sl a I G{� ! n•r 1 �_ II it • . T .-_-r.. - Application for Historic Re -dew Application for alterations to the historic landmarks or properties located in a historic district or conservation district pursuant to Iowa City Code Section 144C. Guidelines for the Historic Review process, explanation of the process and regulations can be found in the Iowa City Historic Preservation Handbook, which is available in the PCD office at City Hall or online at: www.icgov.org/HPhandbook For Staff Use: Date submitted: 'Z� /14 ❑ Certificate of No material Effect Certificate of Appropriateness A, Maior review ❑ intermediate review ❑ Minorreview The HPC does not review applications for compliance with building and zoning codes. Work must comply with all appropriate codes and be reviewed by the building division prior to the issuance of a building permit. Meeting Schedule: The HPC meets the second Thursday of each month. Applications are due in the PCD office by noon on Wednesday three weeks prior to the meeting. See attached document for application deadlines and meeting dates. Property Owner/Applicant Information t r� (Please check pnmary writacl pmon I p µ Property Owner Name: w) !2 yhna1 Email: Phone Number: (3ij) q3C)'-" lD7 Address:SZe�- City: —ft wI6- ri Pam/ State: 17 Zip Code: ❑ Contractor / Consultant Name: Email: Address: City: Phone Number: ( State: Proposed Project Information Address: -71 D C/"k Si dee-f Use of Property: tcx J ( d e4,14h &,( Date Constructed (if known): Historic Designation (Maps arc: located in the I Ilstml. Plesenvatron handbook) Zip Code: ❑ This property is a local historic landmark. OR This Property is within a historic or conservation district (choose location): ❑ Brown Street Historic District X Clark Street Conservation District ❑ College Green Historic District ❑ College Hill Conservation District ❑ East College Street Historic District ❑ Dearborn Street Conservation District ❑ Northside Historic District ❑ Governor -Lucas Street Conservation District ❑ Jefferson Street Historic District ❑ Longfellow Historic District ❑ Summit Street Historic District ❑ Woodlawn Historic District Within the district, this property is classified as: 0 Contributing X Noncontributing X Nonhistoric Application Requirements Choose appropriate project type. In order to ensure application can be processed, please include all listed materials. Applications without necessary materials may be rejected. ❑ Addition (Typically projects entailing an addition to the building footprint such as a room, porch, deck, etc.) ❑ Building Elevations ❑ Floor Plans ❑ Photographs ❑ Product Information ❑ Site Plans Alteration (Typically projects entailing work such as siding and window replacement, skylights, window opening alterations, deck or porch replacement/construction, baluster repair, or similar. If the project is a minor alteration, photographs and drawings to describe the scope of the project are sufficient.) If. Building Elevations Photographs Product Information ❑ Construction of new building ❑ Building Elevations ❑ Floor Plans ❑ Photographs ❑ Product Information ❑ Site Plans ❑ Demolition (Projects entailing the demolition of a primary structure or outbuilding, or any portion of a building, such as porch, chimney, decorative trim, baluster, etc.) ❑ Photographs ❑ Proposal of Future Plans ❑, Repair or restoration of an existing structure that will not change its appearance. ❑ Photographs ❑ Product Information ❑ Other: Please contact the Preservation Planner at 356-5243 for materials which need to be included with application. Proposed Project Details Project Description: Materials to be Used: Exterior Appearance Changes: SAPCDUiist Pres\app_for_historic_revim.dw 12/13 1961 Design No. 5127 by Weyerhauser - Small Mid Century R... http://www.midce-turyhomestyle.com/plans/weyerhauser/1961 ... Mid Century Home 5tgle 1961 a130. 4133 4142 4144 4146 4147 4148 4151 4196-2 4159 41.1 4162 5121 5122 5129 s130 5133 s134 5136 .39 5140 Bibliography Home Mid CenturyStyles House Plans Interiors Home a Plan. > Weve,hi euser Plen9 Desogei No. 3127 1961 BOOK OF 22 FAMILY PLANNED 4 AND 5 ROOM HOMES "A study of this plan reveals an Ideal arrangement for orderly, convenient living. The handy vestibule closet, the spacious living room, the bright and cheery dinette fulfill the Inviting promises of the ezterlor. Front roof overhang creates a friendly sheltered entry." bout a. I �Omatt u. I Pdraov Policv ® 2008 — Mid Century Home Style Search 1 of 1 7/23/14,8:41 AM AiIt'd CeaA--'s de� 10- -� =1 too G ►VM��1� �Pi 1 Cw�h 1 �1 C v` Northview 32" x 20" x 8" White Vinyl Buck Sliding Basement... http://wwA-.menards.com/main/skin/doors-windows/windows/b... 'ORte'd M St'rvr[r7 $ Puulrty" Northview 32" x 20" x 8" White Vinyl Buck Sliding Basement Window with Insulated Glass $108.00 Product Specpir.Minm 0, Variation: White Vinyl Dimensions: Frame: 31-7/8" W x 19-7/8" H x 7-7/8" D Model Number: NVPP3220W7 Menard SKU: 4000335 Online Availability Ship to Home Ship to Store - Freel Store Availability Product Description We use extra thick PVC materials on all of our Perma-Buk Pro windows and then fusion weld the frame and sash corners to assure years of trouble -free performance. Our fully welded frames and sashes ensure that the weather will stay out and the corners will not "open up" over time as with mechanically fastened corners. Our windows are designed with 3/4" insulated glass, a sloped sill and fin -seal weatherstripping to provide an energy -efficient combination. To make installation easier, our windows come fully assembled and braced to reduce your on -site labor costs. We even apply a protective film on the inside and out to prevent against frame damage during construction, and our new innovative design eliminates the possibility of installation being accidentally upside down or backwards. • Built with an extra thick welded PVC frame for maximum strength • Fusion -welded corners prevent leaking from moisture and air • Rugged design is ideal for new concrete construction • Clear insulating glass aids in energy savings • Supplied with bracing and protective film to preserve window during installation • Double slider operation for increased versatility • Both sashes remove for easy cleaning • Includes a half screen for great fresh air flow in musty areas Brand Name: Northview Window and Door Please Note: Prices, promotions, styles and availability may vary by store and online. While we do our best to provide accurate item availability information, we cannot guarantee in -stock status and availability as item quantities are constantly changing throughout the day. Inventory last updated 7/23/2014 at 5:00am CT Online orders and products purchased in-store qualify for rebate redemption. Rebates are provided in the form of a merchandise credit check which can only be used in a Menards store. Menards 5106 Menard Drive Eau Claire, WI, 54703, USA customerservice@menardsoc.com I of 1 7/23/14 8:20 AM JELD-WEN® W2500 Series'3030-1/8" x 56x 56-3/4" White Clad Low... http://www.menpnds.com/main/skin/doors-windows/windows/... toSavlre4rkoatt ' JELD-WEN® W2500 Series 30-1/8" x 563/4" White Clad Low-E 270 Glass Double -Hung Window $229.00 P,uuucispecircmpw: Variation: New Construction White Alum. Clad • Dimensions: Rough Opening: 30-1/8" W x 56-3/4" H Model Number: MENOLJW144600006 Menard SKU: 4042516 Online Availability -- Ship to Home Ship to Store - Frost Store Availability Product D•wripdon JELD-WEN aluminum -clad wood windows are made to be durable, energy efficient and low -maintenance. With natural pine interior treated with Auralast wood treatment, these windows are well protected against wood decay, water saturation and termites and are suitable for any architectural style or design. They're just as attractive as they are reliable! Each JELD-WEN product is designed to create lasting value for your home which is why this model is backed by a 20-year limited warranty. • Brilliant White Aluminum Clad Wood New Construction Double Hung Window with 4-9/16 Jamb, natural pine interior with Auralast wood treatment protects against wood decay, water saturation and termites • Low-E 270 insulated glass with argon for great energy savings • BetterView mesh full screen included for durability and great fresh air infiltration • Auralast pine interior for lasting strength and beauty • Jambs measure 4-9/16" wide • Features Tilt Assist for easy cleaning • Includes an integral nailing fin for faster installation and a tight seal • Desert Sand finish hardware included to match window style • Backed by a 20-year limited warranty & Made in the USA • ENERGY STAR® qualified to save energy, money and the environment • Actual unit size is 29-3/8" wide x 56" high Brand Name: JELD-WEN® Please Note: Prices, promotions, styles and availability may vary by store and online. While we do our best to provide accurate item availability information, we cannot guarantee in -stock status and availability as item quantities are constantly changing throughout the day. Inventory last updated 7/23/2014 at 5:00am CT. Online orders and products purchased in-store qualify for rebate redemption. Rebates are provided in the form of a merchandise credit check which can only be used in a Menards store. Menards 5106 Menard Drive Eau Claire, WI, 54703, USA customerservice@menardsoc.com of 1 7/23/14 8:28 AM Staff Report August 8, 2014 Historic Review for 701 S. Vh Avenue District: Dearborn Street Conservation District Classification: Contributing The applicant, Sandy Dyas, is requesting approval for a proposed alteration project at 701 S. 7tb Avenue, a Contributing property in the Dearborn Street Conservation District. The project consists of a new basement egress window and window well. Applicable Regulations and Guidelines 4.0 Iowa City Historic Preservation Guidelines forAlteradons 4.5 Foundations 4.13 Windows Staff Comments This single story house from 1930 is one of 49 dwellings in the original Longfellow survey areas which have been attributed to Howard F. Moffitt or the team of Moffitt and Blakesly. Located on the southwest corner of 7a' Avenue and Center Street, the house is similar to several other houses on Center, being a single story with auto garage in the basement. The house features a prominent, over -sized chimney which is characteristic of Moffitt houses. The foundation is poured concrete, the siding is horizontal lapped wood, and the roof has asphalt shingles. While an overall charming house, this is not an outstanding example of its period or type, and neither is it an outstanding example of a Moffitt house. In November 2013, a Certificate of No Material Effect was issued to this applicant for foundation work and grade changes as part of an improvement project to minimize water leakage and hydraulic pressure on the foundation walls. The project included inside perimeter drainage tile, sump pump, sealing cracks in the foundation, sealing the soil with bentonite, and raising the grade around the outside of the house. The approved work also included replacement of the existing driveway, and installation of a trench drain system. All of this work has been completed, with the exception of the driveway replacement. The current application is for a new basement egress window and window well. This work has been recently completed. The window well has been constructed of poured concrete. The new window is a Quaker Brighton' casement window, which is a wood window with an extruded aluminum clad exterior. The window has a muntin pattern similar to the existing double -hung windows on the main floor of this house, with the appearance of six -over -one sash. The guidelines state that the material used for the new window well must appear similar to the existing foundation material. In this case, the poured concrete walls of the window well are an appropriate material. The guidelines state that new egress windows should match the size, trim, use of divided lights, and overall appearance of the existing historic windows in the house. Metal -clad, solid -wood windows are acceptable. In this case, the window selected meets the guidelines. In Staff's opinion the work meets the guideline recommendations and should be approved. Recommended Motion Move to approve a Certificate of Appropriateness for the proposed project at 701 S. 7th Avenue, as presented in the application. 1' i� say'' C. S�9q`� � S� 1 r ..L� J�►•,~L' + ' �'... ... i. S i7�rr Y .r �, )f�: 'r' .eF.rfy�y�4�y'�N �I kw Fy'f'. •�-ikP{�� '�•��� • -. --� �^ e ' Y 'c �T'{N� •f- """AY r S `�FI ;R Si •' .f, f. - y - �• _ � ;-?i ti ��*. �x% �_ y Yam' - f � /�,v r,• ' �•-c... ,••�_ - �.•4%.• to Ti 49 � N r1 • , h N �1 • � - y .. , t �'� . � • L F� . ice, • �`�' �,• .: ..� - - .. [` f{ -_ - - `•/ILA ^ +,•. :'e w'� _�Y_ 2 I 1 70 -1111,4- -- r .r .-d -?, r t Is ::. •� "IL MO. i HAW . rA , IW 1 Application for Historic Review Application for alterations to the historic landmarks or properties located in a historic district or conservation district pursuant to Iowa City Code Section 144C. Guidelines for the Historic Review process, explanation of the process and tegulations can be found in the Iowa ON Historic Preservation Handbook, which is available in the Neighborhood and Development Services office at City Hall or online at- www.icgov.org/HPhandhook � I , i r7. J1n For Staff Use:. /J Date submitted:. ❑ Certificate of No material Effect Certificate of Appropriateness ❑ Ma)orrevtew ❑ lowtutedraa; review ❑ minorreview The HPC does not review applications for compliance with building and zoning codes. Work must comply with all appropriate codes and he reviewed by the building division prior to the issuance of a building permit. Meeting Schedule: The HPC meets the second Thursday of each month. Applications are due in the office of Neighborhood and Development Services by noon on Wednesday three weeks prior to the meeting- See attached document for application deadlines and meeting dates Property Owner/Appllca it Information (Plum check pnmo f contact perr)n) ❑ Properly Owner Email! f�li ndq Su,+cl� c�yC I Phone Number: (911) 3 �� 719C (p Address: V4i .S •r'ta�:�. city: CLt�ai Cr _ state: t>p Zip Code: . fc ❑ Contractor! Consultant ;`lame: ) : )I pt i7--, 3, �,,4- c Email Yc ntl affpt.ai Phoue Number. 9,/ °J �F Address: ty* n. City: 161LI} _ix_ State: 'Tf.} Zip Code: _ra^ 3-A "I Proposed Project Information Address: Use of Property-. �„�.1,., ji;m It.,re date Constructed (if known). 7 Historic Designation (Maps arc locatul m the ihytorv, llry crvawo Handbook) ❑ This Property is a local historic landmark OR Q1 This Property is within a historic or conservation district (choose location): ❑ Brown Street Historic District ❑ College Green Historic District ❑ Fast College Street Hism,.ic District ' ❑ Longfellow Historic District ❑ Nortuside Historic District Summit Street Historic District ❑ Woodlawn Historic District Within the district, this Property is classified as: ❑ Clark Street conservation District ❑ College Hn Conservation District XDearborn Sncet Conservation District. ❑ Goosetown / Horace Mann. Consevatiorn District ❑ CrovermrrvL.ut,as Street Conservation District 0 Contributing 0 Noncontributing 0 Nwhismric Application Requirements Choose ap�propinate project type. In order to ensure application can be processed,. please include all listed materials_ Applications without necessar?, materials may be rejected. "on Cl'ypicallyprojecrs entailing an addition to the building footprint such as a mom, porch,: deck, ele.) Building Elevations ❑ Floor Plans ❑ Photographs. ❑ Produot Intbrmation ❑ Site Plans Alteration (7 ypically projects entailing work such as srdmg and window _vii1acement, skylights, window opening alterations, deck or porch replacementconaruction, balustn repair, or sunilar. If the project is a minor alteration, photographs and drawings to describe the scope of the project am su(Picnent ) 11 Budding Blevations ❑ Photographs ❑ Product information 17 Construction of new building Budding Elemitrus ❑ Ftoor PLms ❑ Pbotugnaphs ❑ Product Information. ❑ Site Plans ❑ Demolition (Prrojects entailing the demolition of a primary strur tumor outbuilding, or any portion ora building, such as porch, chimp y, decorative trim, baluster, etc.) Photographs ❑ Proposal of future Plans 0 Renal r or restoration of an existing structure that will not change its appearance. ❑ Photographs ❑ Product trim adon Q Other. _ Please contact the -Preservation Planner at.355-5243 for materials which need to be included with application, Proposed Project Details Project Description: Materials to be Used: .. n i Exterior. AppearanceChanges: twprtslapp_fw bixbriceviev doe 6414 ■r LETS !NCI WWIMar.: ai.iun: 319-62152a53 985 238TH STREET AMY@LITEWINDOWS.CO NORTH UBERTY,IA52317 �i 08#0099177 - Stumpf: SOL +Caite4: SQBTA004661 1 Orrr ta>>>e. Eric Waddell I Line I Label I Quantltv i UQM I Part Number I Unit 1 Extended °x Viewed From FxtetlUf •• Series: Brighton Exact Size. 30 X 48 Rough Opening: 30 3/4 X 481/2 Color:Holly Green,Paint Type 2604,interlor Finish -Pre Painted White, Glasr.LowE 7036/Clear-Stnd,Argon FIIIed,Muntin SDL-7/8" MBG-916, Hardware:White,Vent -1:Total Width Vent,ShFp HardwaresWith Product, Screen.Full Screen, Screen Color:W hite,MateriabBetter View (TM),ShipScreen With Product, install Acc:Htnged Nailing Fin,Depth:4 9/16" Jamb Depth, Onit:S-Casement Hinge Left Exact Size: 30 X 48,Meets Egress NFRC - U-Factor.B3SHGC:0.23VT:0.41CR-.61 Rating. LC-60 Muntin Spacing From Top Of Main Frame: 24" Overall [eating: DP-60 Qipr Nle 2"SOL TO MINK UN Staff Report August 8, 2014 Historic Review for 1220 Sheridan Avenue District: Longfellow Historic District Classification: Contributing The applicant, Charles Brenner, is requesting approval for a proposed alteration project at 1220 Sheridan Avenue, a Contributing property in the Longfellow Historic District. The project consists of the removal of a rear door, extension of the existing back deck, and the replacement of the existing steps and railing. Applicable Regulations and Guidelines 4.0 Iowa City Historic Preservation Guidelines lot Alterations 4.3 Doors 4.1 Handrails 5.2 Decks and Ramps Staff Comments This one and one-half story gambrel roof frame house with entry on the gambrel end is an example of Dutch Colonial Revival design from between 1910 and 1920. It features the broad eaves, cornice returns and paired windows that are common to the style. This can be considered a contributing structure in the Longfellow Historic District. The current application consists of the removal of a rear door to the basement, the extension of the existing back deck, and the replacement of the existing steps and railing. The rear door will be closed in by the new deck and resided with matching materials. The existing deck consists of a concrete stoop, wooden stairs, and a metal handrail. The applicant proposes extending the deck to the edge of the house and covering existing concrete stoop with Azek floor boards. The applicant also proposes to construct new wooden steps and replace existing metal railing with a wooden railing. The guidelines state that the material used for the new deck must be replaced with historic components in design and material. The guidelines also state that skirting with a wooden frame must be added to Ell the space below the deck floor. In Staffs opinion the removal of the door would not result in a significant change to the exterior of the house. The door is a secondary feature and is difficult to see from the public right of way and adjacent properties. Staff has discussed the guidelines for the railing and stairs with the applicant and they are willing to comply with the guidelines. The extension of the back deck and the replacement of the existing steps and railing should be approved. Recommended Motion Move to approve a Certificate of Appropriateness for the proposed project at 1220 Sheridan Avenue, as presented in the application. INA 4 ` �-4• - _ � mil''\ - �t- � ' �, ��♦ �� �'d � � W . _. _erg `+' L J' . r . 4 �7 s. ♦w4 - . ,_0 > r f L r-.�'l"�,a�3a.• •. •may`' w Nn-rA-5 06LAt[.o AIEVt S7- P5 L'c>-' tit '41i w 4IGOQ 6OA RDs �x{5'rJKF. STooya, �.5 L'4K.eR�i� erx-15 -;tl l 4 05 -ea �x�s•tJ�� 5.<f'rsop �Xl5?/nfrK Doan 4' �'L"aj istc 4J! 4 ..f5��� Z JalEtin( Po�TS ©N /�tf xZi�i c�cr� FiG5. L 5 i Application for Historic Review Application for alterations to the historic landmarks or properties located in a historic district or conservation district pursuant to Iowa City Code Section 14-4C. Cnndelines for the Historic Review process, explanation of the process and regulations can be found in the Iowa City Historic Preservation Handlbook, which is available in the PCD office at City Hall or online at: www.iegov,org1HPhandbook For Staff Use: Date submitted-. ❑ Certificate of No material Effect Certificate ofAppropriateness ❑ Major review ❑ Intermediate review ❑ Minorreview The HPC does not review applications for compliance with building and zoning cosies. Work must comply with all appropriate codes and be reviewed by the building division prior to the issuance of a building permit. Meeting Scheduler The HPC meets the second Thursday of each month. Applications are due in the PCD office by noon on Wednesday three weeks prior to the meeting. See attached document for application deadlines and meeting dates. Property Owner/Applicant Information (Please eheck primary coataorpm5 m) Property Owner Name: Zre, vtrt0-T Email: G41Atl-esby-emrl y"?'OAdte.GarK Phone Number:{110°) S`t2-�'lSoo Address: 12 2.0 5 t e6 gi c- . iN-NyP City: =Ut via n,+if State: /tt zip Code: 1572- 7-4 6 Contractor / Conatdtunt Name ` WL 15 Email L{taSi'•'in. .W B. dWM&%one Number:( 1,T)..'324 -1g6O Address: Z*7 01 2 na ';F. city. 601rs.l tt x& state: Z A zip Code: 5 7-'X f l Proposed Project Information Address: 12- 7-0 7!3&; t3 art AYE& Use of Property: `fi Mafy Vrt'5 i i[--AC'0 Date Constructed (if known): l !J C o Historic Designation (Maps are located in the Hmtoric Preservation handbook) ❑ This property is a local historic landmark. OR ❑ This Property is within a historic or conservation district (choose location): ❑ Brown Street Historic District ❑ College Green Historic District ❑ East College Street Historic District ❑ Vorthside Historic District ❑ Jefferson Street Historic District Longfellow Historic District ❑ Summit Sheet Historic District ❑ Woodlawn Historic District Within the district, this property is classified as: Contributing Cl Noncontributing ❑ Clark Street Conservation District ❑ College Hill Conservation District ❑ Dearborn Street Conservation District ❑ Covemor-Lucas Street Conservation District 11 Nonhistorie Application Requirements Choose appropriate project type. In order to ensure application can be processed, please include all listed materials. Applications without necessary materials may be rejected. ❑ Addition (Typically projects entailing an addition to the building footprint such as a room, porch, deck, etc.) ❑ Building Elevations ❑ Floor Plans ❑ Photographs ❑ Product Information ❑ Site Plans Alteration (Typically projects entailing work such as siding and window replacement, skylights, window opening alterations, deck or porch replacement/construction, baluster repair, or similar. If the pmject is a minor alteration, photographs and drawings to describe the scope of the project are sufficient.) ❑ Building Elevations ❑ Photographs ❑ Product Information ❑ Construction of new building ❑ Building Elevations ❑ Floor Plans ❑ Photographs ❑ Product Information ❑ Site Plans ❑ Demolition (Projects entailing the demolition of a primary structure or outbuilding, or any portion of a building, such as porch, chimney, decorative trim, baluster, etc.) ❑ Photographs ❑ Proposal of Future Plans ❑ Renair or restoration of an existing structure that will not change its appearance. ❑ Photographs ❑ Other: ❑ Product Information Please contact the Preservation Planner at 356-5243 for materials which need to be included with application. Proposed Project Details Project Description: /� n ' `C b4.: 1 0� 17 wc�f �i r iG � e✓. �c�r$2 -�e�f G�aS "�� ca c�sS 4-& Burs e wtc Lw �o, c IG .rrmG.r 4 r s see l7 kf 4^ 11af1vi... u�; Is � t�o�-1•y-,..��—,i1 0 �' C'r� r. Materials to be Used: Exterior Appearance Changes: hispres/app_fm_]tinoda.vi. doc 6/4114 ow 1 lhst i;'t('. PCesem.4tiu ? .O[Ill7lkiStiti)t'! MEMORANDUM Date: August 8, 2014 To: Historic Preservation Commission From: Cheryl Peterson, Preservation Consultant Re: Certificates of No Material Effect, Minor Reviews, and Intermediate Reviews The Historic Preservation Handbook requires a report to the HPC at each meeting of any projects that have been approved administratively. Below are the projects approved since the June report. Certificates of No Material Effect — Chair and Staff review 30 N. Clinton Street (Landmark, Jefferson Street Historic District) - repair the front doors; 731 Rundell Street (Longfellow Historic District) - repair molding and bead board on the roof edge and at eaves; 530 Ronalds Street (Brown Street Historic District) - back door replacement; Minor Review — Pre -approved items — Staff review 815 Bowery Street (Governor -Lucas Street Conservation District) —window replacement; 13 South Linn Street (Landmark) - window and door replacement; 447 Summit Street (Summit Street Historic District) — replace front steps and add stair railing consistent with existing front porch railing; 514 Brown Street (Brown Street Historic District) — replace front steps and add stair railing consistent with guidelines; 839 Roosevelt Street (Clark Street Conservation District) - add simple metal handrail at front steps; 509 Rundell Street (Longfellow Historic District) — replace garage door; 515 Rundell Street (Longfellow Historic District) - replacement windows. 610 E. Jefferson Street (Landmark) — replace upper level of front porch balustrade Intermediate Review — Chair and Staff review 524 Church Street (Goosetown/Horace Mann Conservation District) - new screened porch. Bob Miklo From: Bob Miklo Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2014 9:34 AM To: ginalieswaim@me.com' Subject: Revised Agenda Attachments: 08-14-14 HPC Agenda REVISED.doc Dear Commissioners: The August 14 Historic Preservation Commission meeting agenda has been revised to include item H) Discuss Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) for mitigation measures to offset the adverse effects to historic properties, resulting from FEMA funded undertakings for the University of Iowa (Sabin School). The following email provides details regarding this item. * Robert Miklo, Senior Planner City of Iowa City 410 E. Washington Street Iowa City, IA 5224.0 319 356 5240 From: Toye, Teri [mailto:Teri.Toye@fema.dhs.gov] Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2014 6:37 AM To: 'Ginalie Swaim' (ginalie-swaim@uiowa.edu); Bob Miklo Cc: Svendsen, Marlys [HSEMD] (Marlys.Svendsen@iowa.gov); Toye, Teri Subject: HVC relo MOA Mitigaiton Measures Good morning Ginalie and Bob, Please accept my most sincere apologies for not getting the MOA drafted and sent to you sooner for the Commission's consideration. I'm working in Nebraska and have been here for the past month. Three disaster declarations for the state and meetings throughout the damaged counties have left little time for me to focus on my remaining work for the 2008 disaster in Iowa. The mitigation measures that have been developed through consultation and negotiation are below. I will send the entire MCA to all consulting parties via email for a thirty -day review this afternoon or early evening. I wanted to get the mitigation measures to you this morning, even before I can prepare a communication to all consulting parties to give the commission as much time in advance of your meeting tomorrow to consider what we have developed. I had asked Marlys Svendsen to look at the Southside neighborhood when she was in Iowa City recently to help me define the survey area boundaries, and identify any potential historic districts within the area. This helped to articulate the survey boundaries, NRHP nomination or MPDF work products as stated below in the mitigation measures, and I was able to provide the UI with a cost estimate for this work. The MOA allows flexibility in who would accomplish the Southside survey work. Either the UI would provide funds to the City for the HPC to manage a contract with a consultant, or qualified OSA staff would do the work. Ultimately, it's the UI's responsibility to complete the mitigation measures, and all consultant services, whether obtained by the UI or City, would need to meet Federal procurement requirements. This in and of itself takes months, so the OSA staff option would eliminate that part of the process. All of the School of Music relocation grant work, including the MOA work, and including submitting any reimbursement requests to FEMA must be completed by September 2016, so ensuring everything can be complete by then is a concern. We would mutually agree upon who would conduct the Southside survey work at the meeting that would take place within thirty days after the MCA is signed. Marlys also met with Mike Moran, Iowa City Park and Recreation Director, to discuss details of the Sabin School salvage on our behalf The results are articulated in Mitigation Measure B. We can't include any work in the MCA that would happen after its expiration date, which once executed will be very close to the September 2016 School of Music relocation grant completion date. Therefore, we can't include installation of the salvage in Riverside Park, however, Mr. Moran has indicated his willingness to incorporate into the park's design, currently under development by RDG of Des Moines. Sabin School is projected to be demolished in March or April of 2015, and the park won't likely be physically developed until after the grant and MOA expiration date in September 2016. Marlys added salvaging the limestone steps to your list of architectural features. She thought they might be incorporated into the installation in the park. The UI has agreed to salvage the steps in addition to the features the Commission requested. I'm hoping that the commission will agree with what I have drafted below for the mitigation measures, and indicate concurrence at your meeting tomorrow. Like I said, I'll send you the entire MOA this afternoon or evening and that will be sent to all consulting parties via email for a thirty -day review. I hope to receive comments well in advance of thirty days so I can send the MOA out for signatures, execute the document, and the preservation work can begin ASAP. Mr. Moran indicated that he and Bob would work together to secure a City Council resolution approving the MOA for Mayor Hayek's signature. Please let Marlys or I know if you have any questions or concerns. Thanks again for your willingness to work through this process with FEMA. Respectfully, Teri Toye 816-260-0937 Marlys Svendsen 515-729-2568 STIPULATIONS To the extent of its legal authority and in coordination with the SHPO, IHSEMD, the University, OSA, and the City, FEMA will require that the following measures are implemented: I. Mitigation Measures A. The University shall provide funds to the City, or the University may engage the OSA to complete an intensive level historic and architectural survey (survey) and preparation of a nomination to the NRHP for the Southside neighborhood in Iowa City, where the Sabin School is located. The following nine (9) steps are required to successfully complete the survey and NRHP nomination, and must be concluded within eighteen (18) months from the date of execution of this MOA. 1. Within thirty (30) days following execution of this MOA, the University shall participate in a meeting among FEMA, SHPO, IHSEMD, the City and representatives of the HPC to discuss the requirements of the MOA specific to the successful and timely completion of the survey and NRHP nomination. Prior to the commencement of the survey, the University must inform FEMA of their intent to provide funds to the City, or complete the survey work with OSA staff. 2. The City shall award a contract to the consultant of the City's choice, or the University shall engage OSA staff to complete the survey, provided that the consultant or OSA staff is qualified under the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualification Standards for Historian and/or Architectural Historian as determined by FEMA. 3. The surveyor shall observe the following geographic parameters when conducting the survey: the Southside neighborhood is roughly bounded by, and including facing blocks along South Capitol Street on the west, Court Street on the north, South Johnson Street on the east, and the railroad tracks and railroad sidings on the south. 4. Iowa Site Inventory Forms (ISIF) shall be prepared for all individually eligible properties and district contributing resources evaluated as meeting NRHP listing criteria. The number of resources estimated for ISIF preparation is approximately 20 to 30. 5. The surveyor shall prepare a draft survey report in accordance with SHPO and City standards, and submit the draft survey report and ISIFs to the SHPO and City for review and comment. Submittals to SHPO must be hard -copy, single -sided. The surveyor will afford the SHPO and City thirty (30) days to comment on the submitted survey and ISIFs. 6. The surveyor shall make revisions recommended by the SHPO and City to the draft survey and ISIFs within thirty (30) days and resubmit the survey report to the SHPO and City. 7. The surveyor shall evaluate the NRHP eligibility of a potential district that has been identified in the Southside neighborhood along the 500-600 blocks of South Clinton Street, and portions of Wright and Prentiss Streets, including portions of the surrounding blocks. A NRHP nomination shall be prepared for this district, should it be recommended as meeting the NRHP listing criteria. 8. If the potential district is not recommended as meeting the NRRP listing criteria, the survey report shall be prepared as a Multiple Property Documentation Form (MPDF), meeting the general requirements for submittal to the NRHP. The surveyor shall submit the draft NRHP nomination or MPDF to the SHPO and City for review and comment. Submittals to SHPO must be hard -copy, single -sided. The surveyor will afford the SHPO and City thirty (30) days to comment on the submitted NRHP nomination or MPDF. 9. The surveyor shall make revisions recommended by the SHPO and City to the NRHP nomination or MPDF within thirty (30) days and resubmit the completed forms to the SHPO and City. Submittals to SHPO must be hard -copy, single -sided. Formal review by the State National Register Committee (SNRC) and advancement to the National Park Service for listing in the NRHP is not a requirement. The University shall submit electronic copies to FEMA concurrent with final submittals to SHPO and the City. B. The University shall ensure that select architectural elements are salvaged from the Sabin School prior to demolition. The University shall deliver the salvaged features to the City for future installation and interpretation in Riverside Park, in southeast Iowa City, a component of the Riverside Crossings District, currently in the conceptual planning stage. The salvaged features are intended to be installed in the park; however, installation is not a requirement of the MOA, as development of the park will not likely occur within the duration of the MOA. The University shall ensure that an interpretive kiosk is developed to interpret the historic and architectural significance of the Sabin School, planned to accompany the future salvage installation in Riverside Park. The content and design for the interpretive signage will be developed; however, fabrication and installation is not a requirement of the MOA, as installation will not likely occur within the duration of the MOA. The following eight (8) steps required to complete the architectural salvage and interpretive kiosk must be concluded within eighteen (18) months from the date of execution of this MOA. 1. Within thirty (30) days following execution of this MOA, the University shall participate in a meeting among FEMA, IHSEMD, SHPO, the City, and the HPC to discuss the requirements of the MOA specific to the successful and timely completion of the architectural salvage and interpretation. 2. The University shall ensure that the following architectural elements are removed from the Sabin School prior to its demolition: the complete monumental limestone arch at main entrance on the east fagade, to include the date block, the Henry Sabin nameplate frieze/frontispiece above the main entry, the limestone arched entrances at the north and south elevations, the stone steps at the north and south entrances. 3. The University shall deliver the salvaged architectural features to the City's Park Shop, located at 2275 South Gilbert Street for storage by the City's Park and Recreation Department. 4. The University shall ensure that content for the interpretive kiosk is developed by IHSEMD or OSA staff, provided that the individual(s) is qualified under the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualification Standards for Historian and/or Architectural Historian as determined by FEMA. 5. The content for the kiosk shall relate to the Sabin School, designed by architect G.L. Lockhart, and may include information regarding the building's architectural style, two extant Iowa City Community School District buildings also designed by Lockhart; Longfellow School (NRHP listed), and Horace Mann School (NRHP eligible). The kiosk may also include historic images and other relevant material contained in the Site Inventory Form for Sabin School, State Inventory No. 52-04976. 6. All images used in the kiosk will be in the public domain or used with written permission of the owner or copyright holder. The copyright to the kiosk will be retained by the City. A credit line shall be provided on the kiosk as follows: "This product was produced under the terms of a Memorandum of Agreement, pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act, among the U.S. Department of Homeland Security/Federal Emergency Management Agency, the State Historical Society of Iowa, Iowa Homeland Security and Emergency Management Department, The University of Iowa, Office of the State Archaeologist, and the City of Iowa City as a result of the demolition of Henry Sabin Elementary School. FEMA administered Federal disaster assistance through FEMA's Public Assistance Program pursuant to the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act for the permanent relocation of the University of Iowa's School of Music to a site out of the Iowa River floodplain that was significantly damaged by flooding in July 2008 that resulted in declared disaster DR-17634A." 7. The University shall submit draft plans depicting the design and content of the kiosk to the SHPO and the HPC for review and comment. The University will afford the SHPO and HPC thirty (30) days to comment on the submitted draft kiosk. 8. The University shall make revisions recommended by the SHPO and HPC to the draft kiosk within thirty (30) days and resubmit the final kiosk plans to the SHPO and City. C. FEMA shall provide funds to the University for the OSA to implement Archaeological Data Recovery Plan for Laboratory Processing, Analysis, Reporting, and Dissemination of Research related to Site 13JH1436, City of Iowa City, Johnson County, Iowa, Office of the State Archaeologist of The University of Iowa, Iowa City (Appendix A) Implementation of the Data Recovery Plan (DRP) shall be completed by OSA staff qualified under the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualifications Standards for archaeology as determined by FEMA. All archaeological work will be performed in accordance with the Guidelines for Archaeological Investigations in Iowa (1999). Implementation of the DRP shall include curation of artifacts and records that meet the requirements of the OSA's curation Services Guidelines, appropriate research design, and dissemination of the research findings to professional piers and the public. Dissemination of information to the public shall consist of a public presentation or lecture at the Iowa City branch of the State Historical Society of Iowa, or another appropriate local venue, an exhibit at a local museum or an exhibit located within the relocated School of Music building at the southwest corner of East Burlington and South Clinton Streets, in downtown Iowa City. The OSA will create and maintain a website that describes the project and findings. Dissemination of information to professional piers shall be limited to preparation of an article for submission to a professional archaeological journal, or a presentation to professional archaeologists. The following five (5) steps required to complete implementation of the DRP must be concluded within eighteen (18) months from the date of execution of this MOA. 1. Within thirty (30) days following execution of this MOA, the University shall participate in a meeting among FEMA, IHSEMD, SHPO, and the OSA to discuss the requirements of the MOA specific to the successful and timely implementation of the DRP. 2. The University shall ensure that the OSA implements all aspects of the DRP including processing and analysis of materials collected to include cleaning, identification, cataloguing, and preparation for curation at the OSA repository, report preparation, and dissemination of the research findings to professional piers and the public. 3. The University shall ensure that the OSA's draft report on implementation of the DRP is submitted to FEMA and the SHPO for review and comment. Submittals to SHPO must be hard -copy, single -sided. The University and OSA will afford FEMA and SHPO thirty (30) days to comment on the submitted draft report. 4. The OSAA shall make revisions provided by FEMA and SHPO to the draft report within forty-five days from the date of receiving comments, and resubmit the report to FEMA and SHPO. 5. The University shall ensure that a final report is submitted to FEMA and SHPO. Final submittals to SHPO must be hard -copy on single -sided paper. Teri Toye Environmental and Historic Preservation Manager DR-4179/4183/4185-NE Federal Emergency Management Agency VJFO 9221 Ward Parkway Kansas City, MO 64114 816-260-0937 B1ackBerry teri.toye(?,FEMA.DHS.gov August 5, 2014 Iowa Department of Natural Resources Wallace State Office Building Des Moines, Iowa 50319 €,„ICd•. Histir- wic Preservation +C,'onvi2it;-sio ;. Re: 2014 Iowa DNR Resource Enhancement and Protection Grant Dear Review Committee: The Iowa City Historic Preservation Commission is pleased to send this letter of support for a REAP grant for preservation and restoration of the Old Settlers of Johnson County Log Cabins. h1 recent years we supported hiring a consultant to prepare a nomination to the National Register of Historic Places. The cabins were listed in 2013 on the National Register because of their association with the lives of significant persons, their distinctive architectural characteristics, and their yield of significant information in archaeology or history. It is particularly exciting that these historically significant buildings hold the great potential for recreation and educational opportunities. The cabins are an important tradition in the community. Many citizens remember earlier recreational programming in the cabins long before they fell into serious disrepair. They are a well -loved component of the City Park landscape. Their restoration, through REAP funds, can ensure their role in enhancing the community's recreational opportunities. Thank you for considering them for a REAP grant. I'm happy to provide additional information. Contact me at 319-335-3932 or ginalieswaim@me.com. Sincerely, Q I� S�� 6VI-P4 Ginalie Swaim Chair, Iowa City Historic Preservation Commission MINUTES PRELIMINARY HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION JUNE 12, 2014 EMMA HARVAT HALL MEMBERS PRESENT: Kent Ackerson, Thomas Agran, Esther Baker, Gosia Clore, Kate Corcoran, Ben Sandell, Ginalie Swaim, Frank Wagner MEMBERS ABSENT: Frank Durham, Andrew Litton, Pam Michaud STAFF PRESENT: Bob Miklo, Chary Peterson OTHERS PRESENT: Jennifer Cappos, Connie Champion, Theresa Dunnington, Melissa Fath, Nick Newhard, Jon Ozeroff, John D. Spiegel, Alicia Trimble RECOMMENDATIONS TO COUNCIL: (become effective only after separate Council action) None. CALL TO ORDER: Swaim called the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m. Swaim requested that, of the certificate of appropriateness items, item three be moved to the beginning. The consensus of the Commission was to consider item three first. PUBLIC DISCUSSION OF ANYTHING NOT ON THE AGENDA: There was none. DISCUSS LANDMARK DESIGNATION FOR 203 N. LINN STREET: Miklo said this property is located at the corner of Linn and Market Streets. He said the property owner has requested to have it designated an Iowa City landmark. Miklo stated that at the same time, the Planning and Zoning Commission is considering the property for a rezoning from the central business service zone to the central business support zone, which allows a greater variety of commercial uses based on the parking standards. Miklo said, however, the Commission's concern is the landmark status. He said that if the landmark status if approved, it would provide the Commission with review of the exterior alterations to the building and would also make the property eligible for special zoning incentives and considerations. Miklo said the site inventory form prepared by Jan Olive Nash of Tall Grass Historians thoroughly documents the importance of the history of this building. Miklo said the original portion of the building was built in 1872, with a significant addition in 1895. Miklo stated that, as noted in the report, it was originally built as a bakery by Alois Bashnagel, who was a German immigrant. Miklo said the Commission's role in reviewing this is to determine whether it is eligible as a local landmark. He said that most properties in Iowa City that are local landmarks are also listed in the National Register, and the criteria are very similar. Miklo said that a National Register nomination is not being considered at this time, just the local designation. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION June 12, 2014 Page 2 of 18 Miklo said it is important that the Commission consider the criteria in the code, because there are zoning incentives involved with designation as landmarks, including potential tax incentives, as well as rules and regulations that would apply to the building and the property. He said there are two criteria in the code that this must meet: that the property is significant to American or Iowa City history, architectural, archaeology and culture; and that it possesses integrity of location of design, setting, materials, and workmanship. Miklo said that in terms of the importance of the history, that is well documented in the report. He said it reflects early Iowa City commercial constructions as well as the immigrants' influence on the community. Regarding the integrity of location and design, Miklo said the reason that is a criterion is that some buildings have been altered to such an extent that they are no longer recognizable as historic. He said that this one, as noted in the report, other than some minor modifications to some window openings, is very similar to the way it appeared when it was built. Miklo said there are four other criteria of which the Commission needs to find that this meets at least one. He said that based on the information submitted in Nash's report, staff finds that it meets two of them. Miklo stated that the building is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of local history. He said that the building reflects the early commercial architecture of Iowa City, as well as the immigrant influence on the community. Miklo said staff also finds that this meets criterion E, in that it represents a period of construction techniques from history. Miklo said staff therefore recommends that this be approved as a local landmark designation. He said the applicant has a representative present to answer questions. Ackerson asked which part of the building is the addition. Miklo responded by showing the original building at the corner and the area that is the addition. He said there are some historic maps that show the evolution of the building, which was initially a bakery, then later converted to a hotel, then used as a restaurant and saloon on the ground floor, and then various uses over history. Corcoran asked about the upper floors. Miklo replied that there is a combination of rooming units and a few apartments. Sandell referred to a specific view and said that one can see what appears to be windows along Market Street. Miklo said there were one-time display windows in that area. Sandell said the ramp is a recent addition, and Miklo confirmed this. MOTION: Corcoran moved that the Commission approve the designation of the property at 203 North Linn Street, the Bashnagel Bakery, as an Iowa City historic landmark based on the following criteria for local designation: it is significant to American and/or Iowa City history, architecture, archaeology, and culture; it possesses integrity of location, design, setting, materials, and workmanship; it is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history; and it embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction; or represents the work of a master or possesses high artistic values or represents a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction. Baker seconded the motion. The motion carried on a vote of 8-0 'Durham Litton and Michaud absent). HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION June 12, 2014 Page 3 of 18 CONSENT AGENDA - CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS: 336 South Governor Street. Peterson said this application is for dormer windows in the three dormers, with two on the side to be egress windows so that the opening size was changed. She said the one on the front would stay the same opening. Peterson said staff is working with the owner and anticipates coming up with an appropriate design. MOTION: Ackerson moved to approve a certificate of appropriateness for the project at 336 South Governor Street, as presented in the application, with the following conditions: provide product information for the new windows; locate egress windows so as to minimize the cut in the existing fascia; new window trim must match the material, profiles, and dimensions of the historic trim. Baker seconded the motion. The motion carried on a vote of 8-0 (Durham Litton. and Michaud absent). CERTIFICATES OF APPROPRIATENESS: 617 Brown Street. Ackerson said that because he is an owner of this property, he would recuse himself from consideration of this item. He then left the table. Peterson stated that this property is on the south side of the street in the Brown Street District. She showed a view from the street, stating that this is a four -square from the early 2& century. Peterson showed a view from the back and said that the work has already advanced to the point where the window is installed. She said staff has been working with the contractor and the owner and has come up with suggestions for how to get this project into compliance with the guidelines. Peterson said it is not compliant, because it doesn't have the appropriate trim that one would expect on windows. Peterson showed the bay window on the side of the house. She stated that the windows are trimmed out, and the edge of the roof is trimmed, and that is what one would expect for the bay window on the back. Peterson showed a sketch of the expression of the sill and trim at the base, with a different roof, so that there can be window head trim and some roof fascia trim. She said the owners are willing to do this. Peterson said staff recommends approval, with the condition that the final design be approved by the chair and staff. She said there is also a component involving stucco repair to match the rest of the house, which is acceptable to staff. MOTION: Corcoran moved to approve a certificate of appropriateness for the project at 617 Brown Street, as presented in the application and described in the report, with the following conditions: the installed bay window will be modified with a roof that includes fascia trim and window head trim, and with an extended base that includes a defined sill with the applicant to provide information detailing these modifications for the final review and approval by the Commission chair and staff; and new stucco work shall match existing stucco on the existing foundation. Sandell seconded the motion. The motion carried on a unto of 7-n in ... h. .., Ackerson left the meeting. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION June 12, 2014 Page 4 of 18 725 East Davenport Street Peterson said this property is one of the University/Neighborhood partnership projects. She said that a lot of work has been done already, and this is the final phase of the exterior. Peterson showed the front of the house on Davenport Street. She showed the back of the house and where the basement door/landing is. Peterson said that is what needs Commission approval. Peterson said that, with the door removed, the proposal is to put in a window with the same head height but filled in with block to match, with new water table trim, a couple of boards of siding and then trimmed out like the rest of the windows on the house. She said that because it is a change in the size of an opening, it needs Commission approval. Peterson stated that staff is asking for the usual documentation of products and final window size. Swaim asked if there is another entrance to the basement. Peterson said there is a way to get into the basement from the interior. annrtnu• waver o_ ppropriateness for the project at 725 East .... 4- app-irawe a CC:rhl{:dLe Of a Davenport Street as presented in the application, with the following conditions: provide product information for the new concrete block; provide product information for the new window, including dimensions; confirm materials for infill between the window and the top of the concrete block; and provide information as needed for staff review of all other listed work items. Wagner seconded the motion. The motion carried on a vote of 7-0 fAckerson Durham Litton. and Michaud absent). 814 Ronalds Street Peterson said this property is on the north side of Ronalds Street. She said the project involves the addition of a screened porch. Peterson showed the front and back sides of the house. She said the property is a key, contributing property in the Brown Street Historic District. Peterson showed a photoshop of what the screened porch would look like. She said it would fill in the corner and extend beyond the wall of the first floor space, with a landing and stairs down. Peterson said that details for the railing were missing, and the drawings did not show skirting, so staff is just asking that those remaining items be turned in. Peterson said the roof ties in and is as would be expected. Swaim said that it still allows a little corner on the right side but does not interfere with that. MOTION: Corcoran moved to approve a certificate of appropriateness for the project at 814 Ronalds Street, as presented in the application, with the following condition: applicant to confirm skirting design for the porch and balustrade design for the stoop and stairs, including dimensions for spindles and top and foot rails, for review and approval by staff. Baker seconded the motion. The motion carried on a vote of 7-0 fAckerson Durham Litton and Michaud absent). 220 East Jefferson Street Miklo said this property is in the Jefferson Street Historic District but is also individually listed on the National Register of Historic Places and is a local landmark. He stated that the proposal is to replace the windows on the first and second floors, with the exception of the decorative, leaded glass windows on the front of the property. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION June 12, 2014 Page 5 of 18 Miklo stated that the windows on this property are somewhat larger and of a higher grade than one typically sees in a residential setting. He said they also have a rounded trim detail that reflects similar detail on the church itself. Miklo said the guidelines encourage the repair of windows, especially historic windows, before replacement is considered, unless there is an indication that windows are severely deteriorated and would be difficult to repair. He stated that he and Peterson both visited the property and saw a I sampling of the windows but did not see any evidence of the sorts of things that normally lead to window replacement, such as wood rot or warping. Miklo said that the windows they saw seemed to be in very good condition compared to most that they see. Miklo said that even the glazing was in somewhat good shape. He said that, as with any window, periodic maintenance in terms of painting and repairing the glazing putty would be expected. Miklo said they did observe that the sash cords were broken, and therefore the windows were a little more difficult to open than usual. He said that a solution to that would be to repair the sash cords — a relatively simple fix. Miklo said that Peterson has some expertise in terms of having attended training courses on preservation of historic windows, and, based on staffs observation, they did not find windows that warranted replacement. Miklo said that, based on the literature and information from the National Trust and the State Historical Society, staff feels that repair of these windows may be a more cost- effective approach compared to replacement. Miklo said that at this point, staff does not recommend approval of the application. He said that if certain windows are found or demonstrated to be in poor condition, as the guidelines require, then staff would recommend replacement of just those windows with replacement sashes that do not obscure the trim and that keep the same profile and design of the existing windows. Miklo said staff's recommendation is to deny the application, as submitted, but the alternative motion is to approve the replacement of just those windows that are determined to be in poor condition. Corcoran asked if the windows are of the type that has storm windows in the winter and screens in the summer. Miklo said that these have modern storm windows — combination storm windows. He said the interior windows appear to be the original windows. Peterson stated that the storms are well done and fit inside the distinctive trim. Swaim said this is a lovely building that has been well maintained. She said that windows are something that come before the Commission quite often. Swaim said there is a lot of research that shows that replacement doesn't often offer a better alternative than actually repairing what is there. She said that it also maintains the integrity of the house, because windows are an enormous part of the expression of the house. Spiegel said that he is the resident of this home. He said he has lived in the house for four years and has been unable to open any window in the house simply for ventilation. He said that the windows that are operable are only operable with great struggle and do not offer copious ventilation, especially the storms. Spiegel said something about while the storm windows are modern, they're certainly not contemporary, and they lack a great deal of usefulness as well. Spiegel said that the consideration for this request to make this property more habitable. They are respectful of the exterior and its design. He said they simply want to provide the residents of this property, those of this century and not two centuries previous, the ease of their operation and upkeep. Spiegel said they really want to be partners in the restoration or upkeep and they should not be HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION June 12, 2014 Page 6 of 18 denied because they have kept up the property. He said that if they had allowed the windows to deteriorate, there would be no question about this. Swaim said that part of the problem is that there is no evidence in the packet to show the Commission that the windows have reached a point of deterioration where they need to be replaced. Miklo confirmed this. He said that, as noted, there were broken cords, which does make it more difficult to open the windows. Miklo said that if the cords are reattached, the weights then make it easy to move the windows up and down_ Peterson said she thinks that repairing the existing is the more appropriate means of upkeep. She said she feels that total replacement is quite extreme. Peterson said these are not deteriorated; they need routine maintenance. She said they are a very distinctive feature of the property. Miklo noted that the storm windows could be replaced. He said the guidelines would allow that, because these are not original storm windows. Miklo said that if the storm windows are part of the issue with ventilation, those could be replaced. Swaim asked how one would repair the sash cords. Miklo said there is a pocket toward the bottom of the window to the side. He said there is a screw there to be unscrewed that would provide access to the weight. Miklo said that one would then run a new cord, tie it to the sash, and reassemble. He said there are several contractors in town who specialize in window repair and confirmed this is not a complicated process. Miklo said the proposal is to use the Pella architectural series. He said the sample that he saw did not meet the guidelines, because it would call for removal of the sashes and installation of a new liner with the window package. Miklo said that sometimes can obscure the trim. He said the profile isn't the same as the historic windows. Miklo said that if the windows were determined to be damaged or in poor condition, then there are several sash replacement brands that fit in the original opening that would not obscure any of the trim. He said that also, the profile and size of the sash would better match the historic windows. Baker asked how it would be determined whether a window is irreparable. Miklo answered that Peterson has had some training in this, and he would have her look at the windows. He said that in some cases, where photographs have been submitted, it is obvious that there is wood rot and/or separation of the joints. Miklo said that window replacement has been approved in cases such as that. He said that in cases where it is questionable, he would recommend a site visit and possibly also having a window contractor take a look at this with staff to determine if replacement is necessary. Spiegel said maintenance of windows is also a concern, and a new product would solve this maintenance issue. He said the problem that they are having is the inability to keep property maintenance. Spiegel said he does not foresee them being able to overcome that problem. He said the only way to overcome that is by using one of those that require less maintenance. Spiegel said that one can simply maintain these windows and make some very easy adjustments, but these are not easy adjustments. He said the maintenance is a problem, and that is what he wants to get away from. Spiegel said the fact that this is burdensome to them is clear by the fact that they have been unable to do it. He said that is why they are before the Commission in the first place. Spiegel said that the amount of maintenance these windows require, they can't keep. He said that they could spend money and get them back into somewhat of a pristine condition, and they would be back again. Baker asked what kind of maintenance is being put into these windows now that is so burdensome HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION June 12,2014 Page 7 of 18 Spiegel said he thinks some of the window trim will crack and break in some areas and have to be replaced. Spiegel said they are not modern window technology, and they would like to have that technology. Spiegel said that in other things that have been done with the building over the years, they have always kept its historic appearance and presentation. He said they have done the things that are appropriate. Spiegel said the cellar door is now made of steel, for example. He said it doesn't need painting and seals better. Spiegel said this isn't an exhibition property; it is a living residence. He said that historic tours of what it was like to live in an 1890s house are not conducted. Swaim said she assumes that most of the cost of repair is labor. She said that cord replacement would involve very little in the way of supplies. Swaim said that replacing the windows involves a more monumental cost. Peterson said that replacement is a bigger undertaking and a lot more disruptive. She stated that the windows have held up all these years, because they are made of these very high quality materials that one cannot get with modern windows. Peterson said the modern windows therefore do not have the life expectancy of these originals that used old growth wood. Peterson said that is why the old windows are preserved — because of the quality. She said that anything needs maintenance, and as these are maintained, they have a much longer life expectancy and so are more economical in the long run. Swaim asked how often this maintenance has to be done. Miklo said that the cords generally last a long time, perhaps over 20. Ozeroff said that he is a parishioner at Saint Mary's and also a window replacement contractor. He said that he was involved in planning for the replacement project. Ozeroff said that it is hard to tell from the picture, but these windows are larger than typical. Ozeroff said that the windows on the ground floor are 90 inches tall, and on the second floor the windows are 80 inches tall. He said they are very heavy and are original solid, wood windows. Ozeroff said they are not easy to open up. Swaim asked for the dimensions of the upstairs windows. Ozeroff said that it varies. Corcoran asked if the application is to replace all of the windows, including those on the top. Ozeroff confirmed this. Corcoran asked about the big picture window. Ozeroff replied that the big picture window would not be replaced. The proposal is to replace the other 28 windows on the first and second floor. Swaim said that the windows in her house are 96 inches tall but not as wide as these windows. She said that at one time they were painted shut, and then a painter used a putty knife and there was a little touchup. Swaim said those that have been opened that way and those that were fine to begin with really open quite smoothly. Swaim said there are two ways of working this. She said the Commission could make a motion or could set this aside and table it for a future meeting to enable some further examination of the windows. Corcoran said she would like to delay this consideration and discuss this further before taking any action. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION June 12,2014 Page 8 of 18 MOTION: Corcoran moved to defer consideration of an application for the wholesale replacement of windows at 220 East Jefferson Street. Clore seconded the motion. The motion carried on a vote of 7-0 (Ackerson Baldridae Durham Litton and Michaud absent). Miklo asked if a subcommittee of the Commission would like to visit the property inspect the condition of the windows. Swaim agreed and said that someone skilled in working with old houses and windows should be present. She said she believes there is a solution that will work for everyone. 508 South Summit Street Peterson said this property is a four -square in the Summit Street Historic District. She said the application is for new soffits and roof fascia and gutters. Peterson said that gutters do not require historic review, but soffits definitely do. Peterson showed the existing and said that there is also work that has started and is non -compliant. Peterson showed the original and the replacement that is aluminum. Peterson said it covered some of the trim — the dark -painted bed mold — and is altering the historic trim. Peterson said that staff feels this is non -compliant, because it is not one of the approved replacement materials. She stated that the original is wood, and the replacement is aluminum. Peterson said it does not meet the requirements for substitute material. She said the whole intent of the guidelines is to repair, to replace in kind, and, as a last choice, to find a substitute material that would need to be reviewed and approved by the Commission. Peterson said there is a lot of supplemental information in the packet. Swaim added that there are photographs in the packet of where this was rotted through. Sandell asked, where the repairs are already done, if that trim piece is just covered up or if it has been removed. Peterson said she would guess that it is covered up. Sandell asked what percentage of the house has been repaired like this. Peterson guessed that it is about half. Peterson said that staff recommends that if something cannot be done in wood, fiber cement board is the next best substitute. She said that it comes in a beadboard pattern. Miklo said that it replicates beadboard. He said that in some cases, the beadboard can be patched in, and if there is a large area, it may be more economical to use the plywood that mimics the beadboard and is relatively simple to install. Clore asked if that piece of trim is the only concern. Peterson said the concern is that the aluminum is not one of the recommended materials for replacement. She said it does not have the same character as the original. Peterson said that it is running in a different direction. Miklo said the porch has been completed and portions of the front and side. He said someone from the neighborhood had noticed and asked about this, and the owner had not realized a permit was required. Swaim said that for a house with such wide eaves, it is apparent in that the light falls differently on the aluminum with the pattern pieces and such. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION June 12,2014 Page 9 of 18 Clore asked if other houses in the district have aluminum. Peterson said that this may have been done on some houses in the districts. She said that if it was done before the district was designated, it wasn't a problem, as it was grandfathered in. Peterson said it is seen on other old houses, but it would have been done before the area was designated a district. Agran said, to clarify, that the portion of this that was done was recent, and then the project was stopped because of this review. He asked what the ramifications would be for the owners at this point if a motion to deny this were passed. Miklo responded that the aluminum would have to be removed and the beadboard repaired or a substitute material such as the plywood with the beadboard pattern installed. He said the gutters as installed are allowed. Baker said that this issue has arisen before, and the homeowners have been required to remove the material when work has started. She said her concern about this is that it sets a precedent for people to say they didn't know it required a permit and review before the Historic Preservation Commission and be allowed to do something that is not allowed using that as the excuse. Baker said she had similar holes in her eaves and soffits and had them repaired with wood. She said there was more than one appropriate alternative to doing this. Cappos said that she is one of the owners of this house. She referred to the letter citing what a treat it was for she and her husband to move to Summit Street. She said they lived on Oakland Avenue before in a house with aluminum siding and soffits. She said they moved two blocks, because they wanted a bigger house and wanted to live in a historic district. Cappos said they love fixer -uppers, and this is certainly a fixer -upper. Cappos said they took on this house and did a lot of work on it. She said she did not look in the handbook and did not know this wasn't okay, because she came from a house that has even more aluminum. Cappos said she is sorry for not for the situation. Cappos said they plan to do a lot of other projects on this house, and she expects to be before the Commission a lot more for permission to do things that would never compromise the integrity of this home. She said it is really important to them. Cappos said they have spent about $8,500 replacing all the soffits, fascia, and gutters. She said it could cost another 15 to 20 thousand to replace this, if that is what the Commission decides has to be done. Cappos said they cannot afford that right now, as they have done a lot of work on the inside, including plumbing, updating electrical, removing lead paint, and removing asbestos from the basement. She said there have been a lot of other projects to work on to get this house up to the way it is now. Cappos said that she wanted to say she's sorry and would like the opportunity to make this house even better for the neighborhood and the community. Champion said that this house was a disaster. She said that it was infested with raccoons. Champion said they have made so many improvements to this house. She said she hopes the Commission can find some reprieve for them, because they have done so much for this house and Dunnington said she is a friend of the Cappos family and has helped to restore the house. She said that she and Cappos love historic properties, and that is why they chose to live here. Dunnington said she finds this to be unduly punitive and harsh upon them, when it does not impact the street view of the house in any way whatsoever. She said that prior to them taking on this house, it was wretched and like a swamp. Dunnington stated that it was not owner -occupied, and there were tenants coming and going. Dunnington said that Cappos worked so hard and so long and invested so much money in this, because she cares about it. Dunnington said that to have this kind of overregulation and punitive HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION June 12, 2014 Page 10 of 18 action is really going to impact their entire family financially for very little gain. She said she wanted to offer her support for the Cappos family and what they have done to improve that neighborhood. Newhard stated that he is one of the owners of the contracting company that did the work on the soffits and the gutters. He said it starts with him, and he also apologizes to the Cappos family and the Commission. Newhard said they made a mistake; they should have come to the Commission first and asked permission to do this work. Newhard asked that the new members of the Commission and the old members of the Commission looking forward look at the soffit and fascia work maybe in a different view kind of like the gutters. He said he feels that they really helped preserve the home, and he does not think it takes away from the street view. Newhard said his argument would just be to look at this; it's preserving it from critters, rotten wood, and infestation. He said that some of the work in the photograph is not yet done; there is some wood and some aluminum. Newhard said he knows there are rules; and rules are rules. Newhard said that as the Commission moves along and encounters more situations like this, he thinks it is something the board should consider — that soffits and fascia are not changing the look of this historic, beautiful home. Newhard stated that the gutters are six-inch commercial size gutters, and they are covering up the fascia. Newhard said he would appreciate it if the Commission look at this as a single situation. Miklo said it was asked what the ramifications are if the Commission doesn't approve this. He said there have been situations where the Commission has given a time frame to undo work to take into account the financial concerns. Corcoran asked about the age of the Summit Street Historic District. Miklo said it was created in 1983. Swaim said that in this case, a building permit was required. Miklo responded that it was required for the soffit work but not for the gutters. He said that the fascia is not visible; it is behind the gutters. Miklo said he does not think that is a concern. Clore asked if there is anything in the Iowa City rules that requires the City to tell the builder that a permit is required. Miklo replied that it is the contractor's responsibility to seek building permits. He said the contractor would seek a building permit, and the building official would note that the property is in a historic district and inform the contractor of the process that needs to be followed. Clore asked the contractor if he was informed of this. Newhard, the builder, answered that he did not apply for a building permit. Clore asked, if the contractor is the party that did not apply for the permit, why the homeowners would bear the financial burden of this. Newhard said that if this is denied, he will have to sit down with the family and try to figure something else out. Clore asked Newhard if he takes on the responsibility for that, and Newhard said he absolutely did. He said he did something that was wrong in this district. Corcoran asked Newhard if, when he normally installs soffits at other locations, he applies for a building permit. Newhard answered that he does. He said that a lot of work that he typically does with his siding company is in North Liberty, where he does a lot of new construction, in which case the permit is taken out by the general contractor. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION June 12, 2014 Page 11 of 18 Newhard said he had done work at the Cappos' previous residence but has not done a lot of siding work in Iowa City. He said that he started as a gutter company and did not do a lot of that work in Iowa City. Newhard said his company expanded into doing siding in the new construction market to the north, but he has not done a lot of re -siding, soffit, and fascia work in Iowa City. Newhard said it was an honest mistake. Clore asked what the rules are when dealing with a case in which there was no permit. Miklo said that if something is done without a permit, there is a stop work order, and no more work can occur until a building permit is issued. He stated that the fine is a doubling of the fee for the building permit, which is usually not very much. Miklo said that a building permit cannot be issued until the Historic Preservation Commission approves of the proposal. Agran said that he is very sympathetic to the property owner and also somewhat sympathetic to the contractor. He said that he has worked for contractors and knows the importance of pulling the permits, and one always takes a risk if a permit is not pulled, which he knows is sometimes the case. Agran said he feels that this is an issue to be resolved between the contractor and the homeowner He said that if a permit had been pulled at the beginning, before $8,400 had been invested in this property, the homeowner and contractor would have been notified that new soffits made of fiber cement, an acceptable material, could have been put in and would have been more impervious, theoretically, to animals than the wood. Agran said that that would have been a pretty good compromise in terms of repairing these. Agran said it is a tough thing to have this work half -completed. He said he is sympathetic to the concerns of what kind of feelings this cultivates about historic preservation in the community but is also sympathetic to the idea that, if a bar lets a lot of underage people in without carding them and says we should have known better, well rules are there for that reason. Agran said it's hard to hold double standards in that sense. He said this seems like a conflict that needs to be resolved between the homeowner and contractor, and the Commission is here to produce. a simple response to the situation. Agran said that doesn't mean the situation is resolved in any way, but he did not believe the Commission would be the party to provide that resolution. Fath, who said she is a friend of Cappos, said the feeling the community has about historic Preservation is pretty negative because of things like this. She said this is a very expensive thing to ask Cappos to do because of the aluminum soffit, and the soffit doesn't do anything negative to the look of the house. Baker said it is covering up some trim and wood details that were visible originally. Fath said paint a black stripe to replicate the trim. It is nothing; it really isn't. She said that after seeing this meeting, she would never live in an historic district. Fath said she doesn't want the Commission to decide about how much money she can spend on her soffits. Agran said he understands that completely. He said, however, if this was approached in the manner of the church's application, from the very beginning, that motion was tabled because it seemed that further discussion or reconsideration might be needed. Agran said that the fact that a building permit was not pulled for the work makes this an issue that seems to be almost outside the Commission's jurisdiction. Agran said he did not know what he would do in the homeowner's position. He said it is not actually a reflection on historic preservation so much, because if everything had gone according to the rules, it HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION June 12, 2014 Page 12 of 18 may actually cost less than $8,500, because it could have been just soffit repairs instead of total soffit replacement. Agran said this is what happens when one doesn't pull a building permit, and it doesn't reflect on the nature of historic preservation. Newhard said the cost assumption is wrong; it would be a lot more expensive. He agreed that he made a mistake but said that is neither here nor there. Newhard said he knows he did wrong. Regarding the permit, he said he needs to pay the fine and is living and learning. Newhard said that is not the situation here. He said it is not about the permit. Newhard said it is about the Commission looking at this house in a historic district and saying if it is okay or not okay. He said that is what the Commission is deciding; it's not about the permit or anything else. Newhard said regarding the cost he would like the Commission to throw the money out at this point and make a decision about historic preservation. He said metal was a better way to preserve the house. Corcoran said the Commission's job is to enforce the guidelines, and that is the law. She said she served for six years on Iowa City's Board of Adjustment. Corcoran said that like the Commission, it is a quasi-judicial body in that it makes decisions about whether or not people can have variances from the zoning code or special exceptions. Corcoran said there were many cases when people went ahead and put on an addition or built over a boundary line or did something but did not inquire or do any investigation. She said the Board of Adjustment had to enforce the ordinances of Iowa City that were adopted by the City Council. Corcoran said people had to undo work and bear that extra expense. She said she agrees with Agran and Baker in that the Commission has these guidelines to enforce and must be fair to all the applicants who come before the Commission. Corcoran said that if the Commission decides to rescind or partially abrogate the application or a particular guideline or rule, then it does set a precedent. She said it is legal precedent, because the next person who comes before the Commission with a similar situation, and it might not even be soffits but something else, the person can invoke that precedent. Corcoran said that puts more pressure on the Commission to ignore or move away from the guidelines and their enforcement. Swaim said she agrees with Corcoran's points and said that consistency is critical to a body like the Commission. Cappos said she wanted to remind the Commission that five years ago, when she lived on Oakland Avenue, she put an addition on the back of her home and came before the Historic Preservation Commission to do that. She said they also did extensive remodeling of the house they moved into for which they applied for permits for electrical, HVAC, plumbing, and fixing a load -bearing wall. Cappos said they have always gone through the channels when they have decided to make changes to their homes, whether it's additions or just updating whatever. Cappos said it's not like she does this, and this is how she sneaks around. She said this is one time in a massive amount of remodeling, and she screwed it up. Cappos said this is not her way of doing business. Swaim and Corcoran said they understand that this was an honest mistake on the parts of both Cappos and the contractor. Newhard asked if a permit is required for installing aluminum siding and soffits. Miklo said that if one is doing siding work or soffit work in an historic district, a permit has to be obtained. Newhard asked if a permit was required outside a historic district. Miklo responded that he does not know outside of the district; he is familiar with the historic district. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION June 12,2014 Page 13 of 18 Dunnington said that she wanted to respond to the comment about a judicial body. She said that since someone felt the need to inform the City about the aluminum soffits, which otherwise would never would have come before the Commission, one can drive down Summit Street, Oakland Avenue, and other places and find any number of things out of compliance. Dunnington said that she feels like to abuse the power that the Historic Preservation Commission has punitive policing with informants coming to the Commission to tell it about the hideous aluminum soffits that are not even visible from the street really does weaken the position of the historic preservation. She stated that a lot of advocates are being lost because of this. Swaim said that Miklo pointed out that where there is non-compliance, it is because it was done before a district was created. Miklo said the City did receive a call from someone in the neighborhood questioning the work. Wagner said the City does not go around looking for non-compliance but is made aware of this when a neighbor calls in. He said the City assumes it is being done right, and if someone brings up a discrepancy, a building inspector investigates it. Wagner said that is standard operating procedure. Corcoran said that presumably there would be a heightened sense of the historic value and need for preservation on Summit Street. Wagner added that the building permit asks if the property is on a flood plain or in an historic district, and a contractor would check for that when the building permit is applied for. Swaim said that everyone on the Commission is amazed and astounded when someone takes on a house like this that has fallen apart and does not have a good reputation because of tenants and such. She said the City really needs citizens like this who take things like this on. Swaim said that, on the other hand, the City also needs citizens like the ones who serve on the Historic Preservation Commission to keep preservation functioning as it is supposed to, through the guidelines and the ordinances that the Commission is supposed to enforce. Corcoran asked, if a motion to deny is approved, what the process would be. Miklo said that a stop work order has already been issued by the building official. He said the owners could therefore not continue the work to cover the remainder of the soffit. In terms of removing the soffit, Miklo added that there have been other cases when the Commission has given a period to come into conformance. He said the owner would have the choice to leave it as it is for that period or to work with a contractor to undo what has been done and replace it with a material that meets the guidelines. Corcoran said she assumes that, if this is denied, the contractor and homeowner will have to discuss this and then apply for a building permit to move forward. Miklo said that they would not be able to move forward with the aluminum soffit but would have to go forward with an approved material. He said that a substitute material; such as a marine grade plywood with a beadboard pattern, original beadboard, or fiber cement with a beadboard pattern; could be approved in the motion. Miklo said that original beadboard would not require approval; it would involve a certificate of no material effect, but the plywood with a beadboard pattern or fiber cement with a beadboard pattern would require approval, which the Commission could do via a motion. Swaim pointed out that original beadboard would require working with staff and the chair but would not require full Commission approval. Miklo agreed. Swaim asked, for the section that has not yet had metal put on, if there are places that are still open to raccoons and such. She stated that something has to be done for those places right away. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION June 12, 2014 Page 14 of 18 Corcoran said that if this is denied and not allowed to go forward, would there be a need for the homeowners to come back before the Commission with this particular project. Miklo said that if the homeowners are going to replace the beadboard that is currently there with another material, they will need to return to the Commission. He said that to expedite things, the Commission might want to include in the motion the approval of beadboard or an approved substitute material of wood or fiber cement board. Corcoran said she is comfortable voting to deny this and having the homeowners come back so that the Commission can make certain this goes forward properly. She said that the motion could be drafted to include what the instructions are for what the owners would need to do to come into compliance. Corcoran said the Commission can also build into the motion some protection that the owners will also be working with staff and the chair to get final approval for this. Swaim said she assumes the Commission would like to have this move along as quickly as possible and not have this delayed by extra processes and visits. Corcoran asked if the Commission wanted to include a time period in the motion for the owners to come into total compliance. Sandell suggested setting the time period at five years. Wagner said that this was really the responsibility of the contractor, not the homeowner. He stated that the owners would not want to have their gutters half done for five years. Wagner said he did not like the idea of five years to comply, because it sets a precedent. He said there are residents on Summit Street who would love the Commission setting a precedent that when they do something wrong they have five years to fix it up. Corcoran suggested a two- or three-year period. Agran said that some of these things make more sense to him when they are scaled up. He said that when the new building on the ped mall was going up, if the permits had not been pulled at the very beginning, they would not have been given five years to undo it. Agran said the debate among Commission members is a simple one to him. He said it is informed by the financial and emotional complexities of this. Agran said he sees the Commission's response as very straightforward. He said the stopgap occurs before anything gets to the Commission, and that is the permit requirement. Agran said that since the building permit was not pulled, he does not see that this has that much to do with the Commission. He said the conflict needs to be resolved between the homeowner, the contractor, and the City or courts as a mediator if there is conflict that cannot be resolved. MOTION: Corcoran moved to deny a certificate of appropriateness for the project at 508 Summit Street, as presented in the application. Wagner seconded the motion. The motion carried on a vote of 7-0 (Ackerson. Baldrid©e Durham Litton and Michaud absent). Miklo asked if the Commission wanted to consider a motion with an alternate material. Corcoran said she agrees with Agran that this is a question of liability on the part of the contractor. Miklo said the owners would not have to come back before the Commission if the contractor agrees to repair this according to the guidelines, if the Commission approves a motion with a substitute material. He said that if the owner uses original material, a certificate of material affect would be sufficient. Agran said that since the City has put a stop on this, if work is to continue, the owner would have to re -apply for a building permit anyway. He said that would then proceed along its normal course and come back to the Commission. Agran said that if the new proposal is clear-cut, it could be approved administratively and quickly. Miklo pointed out that there have been other cases where the marine grade plywood/beadboard pattern as a soffit repair has been approved administratively. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION June 12,2014 Page 15 of 18 REPORT ON CERTIFICATES ISSUED BY CHAIR AND STAFF: Swaim said there is a list in the packet and asked if anyone had questions. DISCUSS UNITARIAN UNIVERSALIST BUILDING 10 SOUTH GILBERT STREET: Swaim said that Michaud brought this issue up but was unable to attend the meeting. She asked if the Commission would like to defer this until Michaud can be in attendance. MOTION: Baker moved to defer discussion of the Unitarian Universalist Building at 10 South Gilbert Street to the Commission's next meeting. Corcoran seconded the motion. The motion carried on a vote of 7-0 (Ackerson. Durham. Litton, and Michaud absent). Swaim said there are now three items before the Commission from which to choose. She said that salvage of the Sabin School entry arches for reuse in a public park or school was recommended by the Commission at their last meeting. The Commission had also recommended preparation of a National Register Nomination for Horace Mann and an educational program about historic preservation, but the School District has declined to participate so those two no longer possibilities. Miklo said the Commission makes a recommendation to FEMA, which determines a course of action. Swaim said the first option was the salvaging of one or more of the doorway arches from Sabin. She said the second, which would be done by hiring a consultant out of the mitigation funds, was to revise or rewrite a multiple property document for schools throughout Iowa. Swaim said that involves a case when there is a large body of historic structures, such as railroad depots or a certain period of churches, and then this kind of document would be written to give an overall context of railroad depots in Iowa from 1850 to 1960. She said that then any individual depot that is nominated can pull from that document, rather than starting from scratch in putting together the context for a nomination. Swaim stated that the one that was done for public schools several years ago did not pass muster at the national level. She said that is something the Commission could consider recommending. Swaim said the other is an intensive level historical and architectural survey of the south side, which has been one of the priorities of the Preservation Plan. She said that some of those things have not been pursued because of lack of staff and consultant time. Corcoran asked what a survey of the south side would encompass. Miklo said it is basically the River Front Crossings area, which would be Gilbert Street west to the Iowa River and Burlington Street south to Highway Six. He said it is an area where the City is encouraging redevelopment, so the idea would be to determine what is there that is worth preserving or making a landmark. Trimble said she is with Friends of Historic Preservation. She said that one of the things has come up recently with Tate Arms, which was a rooming house for African American students. Friends is working on a site inventory form for a local landmark designation. Trimble said that if an intensive survey is done on the south side, then possibly more of those buildings could get landmark status before they are torn down. Trimble said it is really critical that this is done now, because most of those buildings won't be there in five years. She said a survey would be very helpful, and Friends of Historic Preservation is willing to HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION June 12, 2014 Page 16 of 18 take on writing those site inventory forms. Trimble said it will happen more quickly and easily if a professional does all the research. Miklo said he did talk to the Parks and Recreation Director about the archways and the planned park, where the wastewater treatment plant is at the south end of Clinton Street, and the possibility of incorporating one or more of the arches into some sort of feature in the park. Miklo said that the director was very open to that occurring. Miklo said that, from the City's perspective, there is concern about taking the stones and just putting them in storage. He said they would want, as part of the approval, to have them reassembled in the new park facility versus just giving them to the City to reassemble, because there could be quite some expense to reassembling them. Miklo said that could be part of the recommendation if that is one of the options the Commission selects as a recommendation. Sandell assumed that there may be a trail connection between the City trail there and then south to the new school. He said the archways might make a good threshold as kind of an historic feature. Miklo said an attractive thing about using them in the new River Front Crossings Park is that it is the same general neighborhood where the school is located. Miklo said that there is a concern that just salvaging the stones would not be sufficient mitigation unless they are actually reassembled, and there is some plaque or documentation that leads to something meaningful about Sabin School. Miklo suggested the Commission prioritize the three mitigation items. Swaim said she would like to see that whatever mitigation is taken is something that benefits the community. She said the heart of a community is often its schools, and that is what is being lost here. Swaim said that while she believes in statewide history, if losing Sabin School is a way of saving some of the south side as a result of an intensive level survey that is one way that she sees a bit of a silver lining. She said that her top priority would be the arches, because they are a tangible way to remind people and to show that preservation is not just a building. Swaim said her second priority would be the south side survey, and she would not include the public school rewrite. Corcoran asked about the arches being reassembled. Miklo said that FEMA has indicated that it has to, based on its requirements, resolve the project and have everything completed by September 2016. He said therefore the arches would need to be reassembled or there would need to be a commitment to do that by that date. Miklo said the park planning is going on now. He said the proposal is to remove the school building in the spring. Miklo said if saving the arches is the choice for mitigation, the archways may need to be stored for a period, unless the park plan identifies a suitable location before the school is demolished. Swaim said this is a wonderful opportunity to showcase some of the things that preservation does in terms of salvaging something and finding a new place for it in a public green space. (NOTION: Baker moved that the Commission recommend to FEMA that the following mitigation solutions be considered in the priority order as follows: 1) the salvaging of the main entrance limestone archway and two additional limestone entrance archways for delivery to the City and reassembly for future use in a public park on the south side and 2) the intensive level historic and architectural survey of the Iowa City South Side Neighborhood, identified as Priority A in the Iowa City Historic Preservation Plan. Wagner seconded the motion. The motion carried on a vote of 7-0 (Ackerson. Durham. Litton. and Michaud absent). HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION June 12, 2014 Page 17 of 18 CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES FOR MAY 8 2014: Swaim called for the correct spelling of Moffitt in two places on page one. MOTION: Wagner moved to approve the minutes of the Historic Preservation Commission's May 8, 2014 meeting and public hearing, as amended. Baker seconded the motion. The motion carried on a vote of 7-0 (Ackerson. Baldridge Durham. Litton and Michaud absent). ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned at 7:15 p.m. Minutes submitted by Anne Schulte HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION ATTENDANCE RECORD 2013-2014 NAME TERM EXP. 6113 7111 7/25 8/8 9112 10110 11114 12/12 530 :30 2/13p 7:OOp 3113 4110 6/8 6/12 ACKERSON, KENT 3/29/16 O/E X X X X X O/E X X X X X O/E X AGRAN, THOMAS 3/29/17 — — X X X X O/E X X BAKER, ESTHER 3/29/15 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X CLORE, GOSIA 3/29/17 — — — O/E X X CORCORAN, KATE 3/29/16 O/E X X O/E X X X X X X X X X X DURHAM, FRANK 3/29/16 3/29/17 X X X O/E X X X X X X X X X O/E LITTON, ANDREW X X O/E X X X X O/E X O/E X O/E X O/E MICHAUD, PAM 3/29/15 X X X X O/E O/E X X X x X X X O/E SANDELL, BEN 3/29/17 — — — — X X X SWAIM, GINALIE 3129/15 X X X O/E O/E X X O/E X X X X X X WAGNER, FRANK 3/29/15 X X X O/E X X X O/E X X O/E X O/E X KEY: X = Present O = Absent O/E = Absent/Excused --- = Not a Member