HomeMy WebLinkAbout10-14-2014 Local Option Sales Tax referendum presentationI % LOCAL OPTION
SALES TAX
REFERENDUM
COMMITTEE MEMBE
Susan Mims, Mayor Pro-tem
Tom Markus, City Manager
Eleanor Dilkes, City Attorney
Marian Karr, City Clerk
Dennis Bockenstedt, Finance Director
Support:
Simon Andrew, Administrative Analyst
Cyndi Ambrose, Finance Secretary Room
COMMITTEE'S PURPOSE
To evaluate the overall feasibility of a I
Identify essential factors, including regional and legal considerations,
Make recommendation whether the City should pursue a local option
sales tax.
To make recommendations on
tax should be used.
how a I % local option sales
Consider the City's use of existing resources,
Consider potential financial, economic, and operational risks,
Consider the inclusive and sustainable values and priorities expressed
in the City's Strategic Plan.
To make recommendations on the sales
and the timing of a public referendum.
ESSENTIAL FACTORS IDENTIFIED
Iowa City Strategic Plan
PropertyTax Reform Legislation
State, Regional, and Local Considerations
CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN
Council's major priorities are fostering a more inclusive and
sustainable Iowa City through a commitment to:
1) healthy neighborhoods,
2) a strong urban core,
3) strategic economic development activities,
4) a solid financial foundation, and
5) enhanced communication and marketing.
PROPERTYTAX REFORM LEGISLATION
In May 2013, the State of Iowa passed property tax reform legislation.
Fiscal year 2015 was the first year the bill began to take effect;
True impact will materialize over the next ten years as the bill's provisions are
phased in.
The estimated impact to Iowa City is:
Reduced property tax revenue of $37 million over the next ten years
Additional $14.7 million of revenues to be replaced by State funding.
State has history of not meeting its backfill commitments (ex: personal property
tax replacement, machinery & equipment replacement)
COMPONENTS DIRECTLY IMPACTING
CITY REVENUES
Residential assessment limitation
Commercial/industrial rollback
Multi -residential property classification
Telecommunication property exemption
Summary: Statewide residential growth limited to 3% rather than 4%
Effect:Taxable percentage of residential property will grow slower
Summary: Commercial & Industrial property valuation rollback set to
95% in FYI 5 and to 90% thereafter
Effect: Commercial & Industrial property taxed at a lower percentage;
State to backfill losses to City
Summary: Establishes new multi -residential class of property for
apartments, assisted living facilities, mobile home parks, etc. to take
effect in FYI 7
Effect: Re-classifies these properties from commercial to be taxed as
residential; 8 year phase -in; No State backfill of reduced revenue
Summary: Creates exemption for certain types of telecommunication
property
Effect: Reduces property taxes for telecommunication companies
PROPERTYTAX REFORM SUMMARY
Slows taxable growth of residential property
Lowers taxable values of commercial & industrial property
Treats commercial multi -residential property as residential
Exempts portions of telecom property
Property tax revenues reduced by$51,694,623 in Iowa City over next
10 years; maximum backfill from State is $14,732,059
..........................
..........................
CITY STRATEGIES FOR REFORM-k
LEGISLATION
Revenue diversification — to reduce the City's reliance on property tax
Contingency/emergency funding —to provide flexibility to react to
financial uncertainty
Controlled spending and operating efficiency — to reduce overall growth
of the City's expenditures that will coincide with the expected slower
growth of property tax revenue
..................................
..............................
..........................
FEASIBILITY - STATEWIDE
Sales Tax Use:
Iowa City and Des Moines are the only major metro areas in the state
without a I % LOST
Des Moines faces additional challenges not present in Johnson County
Over 91 % of Iowa jurisdictions have a LOST
Ames example
FY 14: $7.1 million estimated revenue ....
60% property tax relief reduced levy by $1.84 (nearly $4.3 million in
property tax relief)
$2.8 million budgeted to fund community betterment projects including
human service agency funding
a
Property Tax Rate Comparison
(Levy Rate per $1,000 Taxable Valuation)
FY14
FY14/FY13
City
Tax Rate
% Change
Council Bluffs
$17.75
-0.56%
Waterloo
$17.49
-3.95%
Des Moines
$16.92
0.00%
Iowa City
$16.81
-2.66%
Davenport
$16.78
0.00%
Sioux City
$16.25
1.63%
Cedar Rapids
$15.22
0.00%
Coralville
$13.53
0.00%
West Des Moines
$12.05
0.00%
North Liberty
$11.03
0.00%
Dubuque
$11.02
2.23%
University Heights
$10.90
-0.44%
Ames
$10.86
1.31%
Tiffin
$10.62
-11.28%
UTILITY FRANCHISETAX RATES
cityFee
Franchise
Rate
Davenport
West Des Moines
Ames
Iowa City
Sioux City
Cedar Rapids
Council Bluffs
Waterloo
Dubuque
Des Moines
OTHER SIGNIFICANT REVENUES
Gambling casino revenues — Sioux City, Davenport, Council Bluffs,
Waterloo, Dubuque
Electric utility revenues —Ames
FEASIBILITY - COUN
Voting Procedure
A County -wide vote can be called for by a motion or motions of
jurisdictions representing at least half of the County's population
2010 Census: Iowa City = 52% of Johnson County population
The five contiguous cities vote as a block
........ ........
A simple majority of all voters in those five cities irrespective of
jurisdiction will determine if there is a LOST in all five cities
The six remaining cities and the unincorporated County will each vote I
to determine if there is a LOST in their own jurisdictions r'
This process recognizes the negative consequences of having differing
tax rates in adjacent jurisdictions �;
FEASIBILITY - COUN
Distribution of Revenue
LOST revenue collected in Johnson County jurisdictions that approve the
tax goes into one pool
Funds are distributed only to jurisdictions approving the tax
Funds are distributed by the following formula:
75% population (most recent census) / 25% property taxes collected (FY83-85)
This formula recognizes the regional aspects of who pays sales taxes and
the negative consequences of adjacent communities prioritizing competition
for retail development
Encourages economic development cooperation
Examples of distribution formula:
a
LOST Distribution - All Jurisdictions Approve
Jursidiction
LOST Revenue
I owa City
$9,986,000
Unincorporated
$4,690,000
Coralville
$2,510,000
North Liberty
$1,594,000
Solon
$262,000
Tiffin
$234,000
Lone Tree
$174,000
University Heights
$144,000
Swisher
$116,000
Oxford
$108,000
Hills
$98,000
Shueyville
$70,000
West Branch
$10,000
Johnson County
LrL
ug
A
a
LOST Distribution - Contiguous Cities Only
City
LOST Revenue
I owa City
$13,578,620
Coralville
$3,287,272
North Liberty
$1,994,807
Tiffin
$294,094
University Heights
$193,483
Metro Area
F�
1
and
u-
rti
ev.E
N
A
.....................
....................
....................
...................
..........
.................
.................
IOWA CITY COUNCILACTION
Local Options Sales Tax should be pursued and is best
revenue alternative to property tax
City Council approved the following uses for a local option
sales tax:
1) 50% - street and trail improvements,
2) 40% - property tax relief
3) 10% - affordable housing opportunities
Annual budget process will determine detailed
appropriation of funds within the allowed uses
................................
..............................
............................
RECOMMENDATIONS
Street and trail improvements (50%):
Consistent with the City's strategic plan priorities:
A strong urban core
Healthy neighborhoods
Annual revenue could be $4.5 to $6.0 million for street maintenance, annual overlay
programs, and street re -construction
ICMA Resident survey — only 37% rated City street repairs as good or excellent
which was `much below' national benchmark for other communities
Streets have suffered deferred maintenance due to the struggling Road Use Tax fund.
Current annual street overlay program - $642,665; annual trail program - $50,000;
ADA curb/ramp program - $100,000 every other year
City ADA curb/ramp replacement program benefits elderly and handicapped
individuals as well as bicycles and similar forms of transportation ::
RECOMMENDATIONS
(CONTINUED)
Property tax relief (40%):
Consistent with the City's strategic plan priorities:
A solid financial foundation
Strategic economic development activities
Annual revenue could be $3.6 to $4.8 million for property tax relief
Could potentially lower the City's property tax rate by $1
value
Diminish the need for future property tax rate increases
GENERAL FUNDING POTENTIAL
$80,000,000
$70,000,000
$60,000,000
$50,000,000
$40,000,000
$30,000,000
$20,000,000
$10,000,000
2016
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
Property Tax Revenue ■ Other revenues Revenue Shortfall
GENERAL FUNDING WITH LOST
$80,000,000
$70,000,000
$60,000,000
$50,000,000
$40,000,000
$30,000,000
$20,000,000
$10,000,000
$ 4-
2016
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 202:
Property Tax Revenue ■ Other revenues ■ Sales Tax Revenue
................................
..............................
............................
RECOMMENDATIONS
(CONTINUED) ......:: :
Affordable housing opportunities (10%):
Consistent with the City's strategic plan priorities:
Inclusive values
Healthy neighborhoods
Annual revenue could be $.9 to $1.2 million for affordable housing opportunities
75% of funds to be used for housing for households with income at or below 80% of
median income as defined annually by federal regulations
ICMA Resident survey — only 36% rated City's availability of affordable quality
housing as good or excellent which was `below' the national benchmark for other
communities
Could be dispersed to housing agencies, used for affordable housing projects, or be
used by the Iowa City Housing Authority
OTHER ISSUES CONSIDERED
Sunset clause - I OYears recommended
Gives voters a chance to renew
Enough time to determine impact of sales tax
General public would be more comfortable with end date
Referendum timing — General Election in November
Better voter turnout/participation than special election
Election already scheduled
Less expense to taxpayers