The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2002-10-08 Info Packet of 10/3"~="""~'"=~ CITY COUNCIL INFORMATION PACKET CITY OF IOWA CITY October 3, 2002 www.icgov.org I oc oBE. 7 wo.K sEss,o. I IP1 Memorandum from City Attorney: Review of City Council 2001 Initiatives to Address Underage Drinking and Over-Consumption of Alcohol IP2 Memorandum from Police Chief: Alcohol Compliance Checks - Sales to Minors I MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS IP3 Letter from Assistant City Manager to Jon Koebrick (MCC Iowa d/b/a Mediacom): Cable Franchise Ordinance/Franchise Agreement Violations IP4 Memorandum from City Clerk: September 23 Council Work Session IP5 Email from Kumi Morris: Masonry Institute Award for Tower Place and Parking IP6 Letter from Mark Anderson (Chair, Airport Commission) to Nicoletta Oliver (FAA): Release of Airport Property IP7 Letter from Elizabeth and Peter Riesz to Tom Brase (SEATS): SEATS Service IP8 Building Permit Information - September 2002 Distributed at 10/7 Work Session: Letter from Brenda Rainey: Concerned Parent (alcohol issues) CITY COUNCIL INF PACKET CITY OF IOWA CITY October 3, 2002 www.icgov.org OCTOBER 7 WORK SESSION IPl from City Attorney: Review of Council 2001 Initiatives to Underage Drinking and of Alcohol IP2 from Police Chief: Alcohol )liance Checks - Sales to Minors MISCELLANE ITEMS IP3 Letter from Assistant Cit~ ~nager to Koebrick (MCC Iowa d/b/a Mediacom): Cable Franchise Ordinan~ Agreement Violations IP4 Memorandum from City Clerk: .~mber 23 Council Work Session IP5 Email from Kumi Morris: Ma Institute Award for Tower Place and Parking IP6 Letter from Mark Anderson Airport mmission) to Nicoletta Oliver (FAA): Release of Airport Prope IP7 Letter from Elizabeth am Riesz to Tom (SEATS): SEATS Service IP8 Building Permit Infol September 2002 City of Iowa City MEMORANDUM Date: October 2, 2002 To: City Council . ,iJ From: Eleanor M. Dilkes, City Attorney Re: Review of City Council 2001 Initiatives to Address Underage Drinking and Over- consumption of Alcohol I. Issue In August of 2001, after considering a number of mechanisms to address underage drinking and over-consumption of alcohol, the City Council enacted an ordinance designed to implement the following two initiatives: 1. Pursuit of administrative penalties (fines, suspensions, revocations) against the licensee (establishment) for violations of the law by the licensee or employees of the licensee; and 2. Limitations on drink specials/out-of-sight sales This memo will address the status of these two Council initiatives. II. Conclusions 1. The pursuit of administrative penalties is having the intended effect, i.e. consequences for an establishment when an employee has served underage persons. The effectiveness of this initiative should be periodically assessed as the enfomement effort is only 7 months old. 2. If the City Council desires to continue to restrict out-of-sight sales, the ordinance should be amended to change "servings" to "containers". III. Discussion 1. Administrative Penalties. As was discussed at great length prior to the passage of the ordinance, the State Code authorizes the imposition of administrative penalties against a licensee as a consequence of violations of the law by the licensee's employees. Initial assessment of the penalty may be by either the State Alcoholic Beverages Division (ABD) or the City Council. While the ordinance set in place the framework for City Council imposition of such penalties, the significance of the ordinance was the Council's direction that the City engage in an enforcement effort directed at employees of an establishment so that the licensee could be held accountable by administrative penalty. Prior to the City Council's initiative, the Police Department's focus was on charging the underage drinkers with possession of alcohol under legal age (PAULA). Such charges have no ramifications for the licensee, and as a result, arguably little chance of changing the practices of the establishment. As a reminder, conviction of the employee of an establishment for serving an underage person results in the following administrative penalties: October 2, 2002 Page 2 a. First conviction - Civil penalty of $500; suspension for 14 days upon failure to pay civil penalty. b. Second conviction within two years - 30-day suspension and civil penalty in the amount of $1,500. c. Third conviction within three years - 60-day suspension and civil penalty in the amount of $1,500. d. Fourth conviction within three years - Revocation. At the City Council's direction, my office has referred criminal charges to the ABD for pursuit of administrative penalties. Essentially, the reason for Council's decision to refer these matters to the ABD was two-fold. First, unlike the Council, the ABD is charged only with enforcement of alcohol laws and is arguably less vulnerable to political pressures than the City Council. Second, any administrative penalty imposed by the City is appealable to the State. My staff has regular contact with officials at the ABD and we have been pleased with the ABD's follow-up. The Police Department's enforcement effort targeting sales to underage persons did not actually begin until April 2002 when the department began doing compliance checks two times a month. In addition to the police department's efforts to educate establishments about the intended enforcement, it is my understanding that the Police Department had difficulty securing underage persons to assist with the compliance checks. In the information packet of 6/6/02 Andy Matthews provided you with a copy of Sergeant Troy Kelsay's letter to the establishments explaining the enforcement. The attached exhibit identifies the criminal charges and the status of administrative penalties by establishment. Although there has been significant activity to date, and it appears the effort is having the intended effect, additional time is needed to assess the impact of this effort. The Police Department's resources have been concentrated downtown due to the magnitude of the problem downtown as evidenced by the large number of PAULA citations being issued to persons in the downtown establishments. It is my understanding that compliance checks will soon be expanded to include areas outside the downtown. Representatives of the police department will be available Monday night to answer any questions you may have about the compliance checks. II. Specials/Limitations on Sales Section 4-5-7 of the City Code, entitled "Limitations on Sales" includes prohibitions on "specials" (two-for-one; all-you-can-drink) and "out-of-sight sales" (two "servings" per person). The former was aimed at over-consumption and the latter was aimed at underage drinking. The police have cited four violations of this section, two of which have resulted in dismissal before trial and one after appeal to a district court judge. Two of the dismissals were based on language of the charge that was not consistent with the ordinance, a problem that can be corrected with charging language that mirrors the ordinance. The third, which was dismissed October 2, 2002 Page 3 at the district court level, was based on the ambiguity of the word "serving". If Council desires to continue a prohibition on out-of-sight sales, it would be my recommendation to change the word "serving" to "container". "Container" is an easier term to define than is "serving". I note, however, that there may be some objection to such language, as it would affect "servings" or "drinks" that are typically sold in more than one container (e.g., a "Stoplight", which is three shot glasses served one on top of the other, or a shot with a beer chaser). With regard to the two-for-one and all-you-can-drink prohibitions, you will recall that prior to passage of the ordinance Council removed language which would have prohibited establishments from reducing the price of alcoholic beverages from that customarily charged. There was objection to this provision from some establishments. Council should consider whether limiting two-for-one and all-you-can-drink specials has the intended effect when an establishment can reduce its prices in such a manner that encourage the over-consumption the ordinance is intended to limit. I will be available at your work session on October 7 to discuss this matter along with representatives of the police department. cc: Steve Atkins Dale Helling Marian Karr Andy Matthews Sarah Holecek R.J. Winkelhake Troy Kelsey Matt Johnson eleanor/mem/alc-initiatives.doc 10~2~02 ADMINISTRATIVE PENALTIES - SUMMARY Establishment Criminal citations against Outcome of Admn Penalty employee Criminal Citations Assessed by ABD Airliner Serving underage person July 02 Pled Guilty $500 fine Alley Cat Serving underage person April 02 Pled Guilty $500 fine Atlas Grill Serving underage person April 02 Pled Guilty $500 fine College St. Billiards Dispense after hrs May 01 Dismissed by JCAO Hearing set: 3/27/02 (Settlement Order proposed but not finalized) Serving underage person June 02 Dismissed by JCAO N.A. Diamond Dave's Serving underage person Sep 02 Initial Appearance Set (Old Capitol) Etc. Serving underage person July 02 SET FOR TRIAL Fieldhouse Serving underage person May 02 Pled Guilty Fitzpatrick's Serving underage person June 02 Pled Guilty $500 fine - APPEALED Hearing set: 10/29/02 Gabe's Serving underage person May 02 Pled Guilty Dispense after hrs July 02 Pled Guilty Green Room Sewing underage person June 02 SET FOR TRIAL George's Dispense after hrs April 01 Pled Guilty $500 fine Grizzley's Serving underage person May 02 Pled Guilty $500 fine It's Brother's Serving underage person May 02 SET FOR TRIAL Kum & Go Dispense after hrs April 01 Both Pled Guilty $500 fine (1 incident- 2 employees) Malone's Serving underage person April 02 SET FOR TRIAL Serving underage person May 02 SET FOR TRIAL Martini's Limitations on sales Feb 02 SET FOR TRIAL ABO = State Alcoholic Beverages Division JCAO = Johnson County Attorney's Office 10/2/02 Mickey's Serving underage person May 02 SET FOR TRIAL Mondo's Serving underage person May 02 Dismissed by JCAO N.A. Morgan's Serving underage person July 02 Pled Guilty $500 fine Serving underage person April 02 Pled Guilty $1500 fine AND 30 day suspension Serving underage person May 02 Pied Guilty $1500 fine AND 60 day suspension One-Eyed Jake's Limitations on sales Nov 01 Dismissed by court N.A. Limitations on sales Nov 01 Dismissed by cour~ N.A. Serving underage person May 02 Pled Guilty $500 fine Serving underage person June 02 SET FOR TRIAL Press Box Serving underage person May 02 Pled Guilty $500 fine Q-Bar Limitations on sales Nov 01 Not Guilty ON N.A. APPEAL R.T.'s Serving underage person May 02 SET FOR TRIAL Serving underage person July 02 SET FOR TRIAL The Summit Serving underage person Sept 02 (charges pending) Union Bar Serving underage person April 02 SET FOR TRIAL Serving underage person May 02 SET FOR TRIAL Serving underage person June 02 SET FOR TRIAL The Vine Serving underage person Sep 01 Found Guilty $500 fine Dispense after hfs Jan 02 Pled Guilty Serving underage person May 02 Pled Guilty $1500 fine AND (30) day suspension Vito's Dispense after hrs April 14, 01 Dismissed by court $500 fine AND Dispense after hfs April 27, 01 Dismissed by court 14-day suspension (on appeal) Serving underage person Sep 01 Found NOT Guilty N.A. Serving underage person April 02 Pied Guilty Serving underage person May 02 SET FOR TRIAL Serving underage person July 02 SET FOR TRIAL Serving underage person Sep 02 Initial Appearance Set ABD = State Alcoholic Beverages Division JCAO = Johnson County Attorney's Office City of Iowa City MEMORANDUM TO: City Council / FROM: R.J. Winkelhake, Police Chief ~.~--/' DATE: October 3, 2002 RE: Alcohol Compliance Checks - Sales to Minors Since the Police Department began using underage volunteers in its compliance checks in April involving sales of alcohol to minors, 112 compliance checks have been conducted. To summarize the data provided herein, compliance rates have increased almost 50% since implementation. The data is as follows: In April, 20 compliance checks - 6 failed (failure rate of 30%) In May, 28 compliance checks - 14 failed (failure rate of 50%) In June, 21 compliance checks- 5 failed (failure rate of 23.8%) In July, 25 compliance checks - 4 failed (failure rate of 16%) In September, 18 compliance checks - 3 failed (failure rate of 16.6%) In total, 112 compliance checks resulting in 32 failures (failure rate of 28.5%). cc: Stephen Atkins, City Manager Dale Helling, Assistant City Manager Eleanor Dilkes, City Attorney Marian Karr, City Clerk Capt. Matt Johnson, Police Department September 27, 2002 Mr. Jori Koebrick Director of Governmental Relations MCC Iowa d/b/a Mediacom 6300 Council St., N.E. Cedar Rapids, IA 52402 Re: Cable Franchise Ordinance/Franchise Agreement Violations Dear Jon: The City believes that various violations of the Cable Franchise Ordinance and Franchise Agreement have occurred in the course of Mediacom's operations in Iowa City. We have reached this conclusion based on our review of our various discussions, as well as correspondence, data and documents provided by Mediacom relating to performance/compliance issues under the Cable Franchise Ordinance and Cable Franchise Agreement. City Code Section 12--4-16(A) requires that the grantee file with the City schedules which shall describe all services offered, all rates and charges of any kind, and all terms and conditions relating thereto, and further provides that no rates or charges shall be effective except as they appear on a schedule so filed. Grantee is also required to notify the City and subscribers in writing at least thirty (30) days prior to the implementation of any change in services offered, rates, charges, or terms and conditions related thereto. City Code Section 12-4-16(F) provides that the grantee may establish charges for its services not specified in 12-16(A), but that all such charges, including but not limited to additional service, leased channel, discrete channel, and production rates shall be made public and two (2) copies of the schedule of charges, as originally and thereafter modified, shall be filed with the City Clerk thirty (30) days prior to the effective date of such charges. No such schedules were filed with the City as required by City Code, nor was such filing made with the City Clerk of the charges identified in Section 12-4-16(F). Nothing can substitute for this requirement, whether it is meetings with City staff, Commission, or publication in newspapers. The Franchise Agreement, Section XX(B) requires the City to notify Franchisee in writing of such violations, which was done by letter dated June 13, 2002. It fudher provides for cure provisions if the violations can be corrected within 30 days, that the Franchisee submits a plan satisfactory to the City to correct the violation. As this is not an issue susceptible to such cure provisions, implementation of liquidated damages as provided in Section XX(B) shall be chargeable to the Letter of Credit if not tendered within thirty (30) days. Liquidated damages of $150 per day may be imposed for such violations, which amount to 30 days in violation of such provisions or $4,500.00. City Code 12-4-16A requires the franchisee to notify customers 30 days in advance of any rate changes. From the documentation provided, the City has determined that the 410 EAST WASHINGTON STREET · IOWA CITY, IOWA 52240- 1826 * (319) 356 5000 , FAX (319) 356-5009 Page 2 September 24, 2002 notification of a rate change in the Family tier was sent to subscribers on January 17, 2002 and a rate change went into effect on February 1, 2002, 14 days later. The Franchise Agreement, Section XX(B) requires the City to notify Franchisee in writing of such violations, which was done by letter dated June 13, 2002. It further provides for cure provisions if the violations can be corrected within 30 days, that the Franchisee submits a plan satisfactory to the City to correct the violation. As this is not an issue susceptible to such cure provisions, implementation of the liquidated damages as provided in Section XX(B) shall be chargeable to the Letter of Credit if not tendered within thirty (30) days. Liquidated damages of $150 per day may be imposed for such violations, which amount to 14 days in violation of such provisions or $2,100.00. City Code 12-4-16A also requires the company to notify subscribers in writing at least 30 days prior to the implementation of any change in services offered. On January 24, 2001 Franchisee began to pull filters that caused premium channels to disappear from the subscriber's analog tier. While the Franchisee did place an ad in the Dec. 13 and 31, 2001 Press Citizen newspaper, one of three newspapers in Iowa City, Iowa, which has approximately 43% penetration in Iowa City, these ads were incomplete, and given the definition in the ordinance, not legally sufficient. The Franchisee did send written notice to subscribers on January 17, 2002 in the form of a brochure, outlining the premium channel changes. The Franchise Agreement, Section XX(B) requires the City to notify Franchisee in writing of such violations, which was done by letter dated June 13, 2002. It further provides for cure provisions if the violations can be corrected within 30 days, that the Franchisee submits a plan satisfactory to the City to correct the violation. As this is not an issue susceptible to such cure provisions, implementation of the liquidated damages as provided in Section XX(B) shall be chargeable to the Letter of Credit if not tendered within thirty (30) days. Liquidated damages of $150 per day may be imposed for such violations, which amount to 23 days in violation of such provisions or $3,450.00. With respect to the issue of "forced digital scripts", erroneous information was provided to numerous customers by Mediacom representatives, resulting in much confusion to customers and many complaints to the City Cable TV Office. Many were told that they needed to buy through a digital tier to receive pay channels and unnecessarily bought the digital tier based on such erroneous information. Such misinformation is still being provided by Mediacom customer service representatives. The Franchise Agreement, Section XX(B) requires the City to notify Franchisee in writing of such violations, which was done by letter dated June 13, 2002. It further provides for cure provisions if such violations can be corrected within 30 days, that the Franchisee submits a plan satisfactory to the City to correct the violation. Again, such past errors are not subject to cure provisions, so implementation of the liquidated damages as provided in Section XX(B) shall be chargeable to the Letter of Credit if not tendered with thirty (30) days. As such violations are still occurring according to complaints that are still being received, the Franchisee is still subject to such damages since the time such scripts were first implemented, which appears to be January 24, 2002. Liquidated damages of $150 per day for 242 days for being in violation of such provisions amount to $36,300.00. The subject of how to help subscribers more clearly understand this matter in the future may be a matter of discussion. FCC Customer Service Standards require that the cable operator maintain a local, toll- free or collect call telephone access line which will be available to its subscribers 24 hours a day, seven days a week. Additionally, it provides that telephone answer time by customer service representatives shall not exceed thirty (30) seconds when the Page 3 September 24, 2002 connection is made, and that the standards shall be met not less than ninety (90) percent of the time, measured on a quarterly basis. Data provided to date demonstrates that requirements were not met over a continuous six month period from January, 2002 to June, 2002. For this six month period of noncompliance, at $150 per day, this would amount to $27,150.00. While the FCC standards were met in July, 2002, additional subscriber complaints continue to be received regarding the ability to reach the Franchisee's office by phone. Additional information supplied by Mediacom indicates that the 90% guidelines were met in August. Since this has been a matter of grave concern to subscribers and one that the City Cable TV Office has received a number of complaints about, an ongoing monthly report regarding Mediacom's phone management response time data should be supplied to the City on an ongoing basis. It has been brought to our attention that 47 CFR 76.921 (b) states: "A cable operator not subject to effective competition may not discriminate between subscribers to the basic service tier and other subscribers with regard to the rates charged for video programming offered on a per-channel or per-program charge basis." It appears that Mediacom is charging Basic subscribers a higher price for premium channels than for digital subscribers. If this is the case, it appears that this would be in violation of the law. Would Mediacom please respond why this would not be the case? It is the City's proposal that all fines collected from the Franchisee be refunded to the subscribers. In this manner, it is hoped that in this way Mediacom can illustrate its good intentions, build good will, and begin to restore confidence and trust in its subscribers. While the ultimate goal and efforts of City staff and the Telecommunications Commission, and hopefully that of Mediacom, is to ensure that cable services are provided in an efficient and fair manner, in compliance with FCC rules and regulations and the City's cable Franchise Ordinance and Franchise Agreement, given the level of complaints received by customers, the numerous violations, and the lack of sufficient corrective action, imposition of liquidated damages is warranted. The City looks forward to discussing with Mediacom the matters addressed in this letter and reaching a resolution. If you have any questions or wish to discuss these matters further, please feel free to contact me or Drew Shaffer at 356-5046. Sincer?,ly, Dale E. Helling Assistant City Manager cc: City Council ICTC Drew Shaffer Andy Matthews Mg r~assista nt\ltrs\koebrick9-24-02.doc City of Iowa City IP4 MEMORANDUM . Date: September 23, 2002 To: Mayor and City Council From: Marian K. Karr, City Clerk Re: Council Work Session, September 23, 2002, 6:30 PM in Emma J. Harvat Hall Council: Champion, Kanner, Lehman, O'Donnell, Pfab, Vanderhoef, Wilburn Staff: Atkins, Helling, Dilkes, Karr, Logsden, Franklin, Howard Miklo, Davidson Tapes: 02-71, Side 2; 02-74, Both Sides; 02-75, Side 1 (A complete transcription is available in the City Clerk's Office) AGENDA ITEMS 1. (Consent Calendar #2e(3) - setting public hearing on ... City Steps ...) Council Member Wilburn stated due to a conflict of interest he may ask for separate consideration of this item at the formal meeting. 2. (Item #13, #14, #15 - Resolution ... reclassifications) In response to Council Member Vanderhoef, City Mgr. Atkins stated the overall dollar amount is negligible in terms of what they are making versus what they are making at the present time. COUNCIL APPOINTMENTS Airport Zoning Bd. of Adjustment (1) - no applicants, readvertise Airport Zoning Commission (2) - no applicants, readvertise PLANNING & ZONING ITEMS PCD Director Franklin presented information on the following items: A. Setting a public hearing for October 8 on an ordinance changing the zoning designation from Low- Density Multi-Family (RM-12) to Sensitive Areas Overlay Low-Density Multi-Family (OSA-12) on 1.06 acres to allow a 14-unit multi-family building located on the west side of First Avenue south of Stuart Court. B. Public hearing on a resolution amending the Comprehensive Plan to adopt the Southwest District Plan for the area located generally south of Melrose Avenue, west of the Iowa River, north of Highway 1 West and east of the Iowa City Landfill. Separate discussion later in the meeting. C. Public hearing on a ordinance changing the zoning designation from 1) High Density Multi-Family Residential, RM-44, to Medium Density Multi-Family Residential, RM-20 with a Conditional Zoning Agreement, for an 8.69-acre property located north of Highway 1 and west of Miller Avenue; 2) Community Commercial, CC-2, to Medium Density Multi-Family Residential, RM-20 with a Council Work Session September 23, 2002 Page 2 Conditional Zoning Agreement, for a 1.45-acre property located north of Highway 1 and west of Miller Avenue; and 3) Medium Density Single-Family Residential, RS-8, to Community Commercial, CC-2, for a 1.45-acre property located north of Highway 1 and west of Miller Avenue. (RuppedJREZ02- 00013) Separate discussion later in the meeting. D. Public hearing on an ordinance vacating portions of the Harrison Street and Prentiss Street rights-of- way and an adjoining alleyway, west of Madison Street. (University/VAC02-00004) E. Public hearing on an ordinance vacating Grand Avenue Court from Melrose Avenue to a line 295 feet to the north of Melrose Avenue. (UniversityNAC02-00003) University of Iowa representatives Rod Lehnertz and Larry Wilson presented information regarding the request. Asst. PCD Director Davidson present for discussion. F. Public hearing on an ordinance vacating portions of Front Street and Prentiss Street generally located south of Burlington Street and west of Madison Street. (CRANDICNAC02-00002) Senior Planner Miklo stated that the consensus of the P&Z members that voted for denial was to come to Council works session on October 7 for discussion. G. Ordinance amending the preliminary Planned Development Housing Overlay (OPDH-12) plan for Lot 259 of Windsor Ridge, Part 15, Glen Brook Condominiums, a 46-unit residential development at the intersection of Court Street and Camden Road. (REZ02-00011) (First Consideration) H. Ordinance amending the Zoning Code, Section 14-6H-1, General Industrial Zone, to allow repair of commercial and industrial trucks as a provisional use. (First Consideration) I. Ordinance changing the zoning designation from General Industrial, I-1, to Intensive Commercial, CI- 1, for 1.14-acres located west of Riverside Drive south of Commercial Drive. (Gringer/REZ02-00007) (Pass and Adopt) J. Ordinance changing the zoning designation from Low Density Single Family, RS-5, to Planned Development Housing Overlay, OPDH-5, to allow 23 single-family lots and 13 townhouse-style units in Village Green, Part XXII, a 9.31-acre 24-1ot residential subdivision located west of Scott Boulevard and north of Wellington Drive. (REZ02-00008) (Pass and Adopt) K. Resolution approving the preliminary plat of Village Green, Part XXII, a 9.31-acre, 24-10t residential subdivision located north of Wellington Road and west of Scott Boulevard. L. Resolution approving the final plat of Village Green, Part XXII, a 9.31-acre, 24-1ot residential subdivision located north of Wellington Road and west of Scott Boulevard. SOUTHWEST DISTRICT PLAN.(Item #4b) PCD Director Franklin introduced Senior Planner Miklo and Project Manager Howard who presented the Plan. PCD Director Franklin and Asst. PCD Director Davidson present for questions. Council Member Kanner requested a list of brainstorming ideas mentioned for the County Farm area. Council Work Session September 23, 2002 Page 3 RUPPERT REZONING (Item #4c) Project Manager Howard and Senior Planner Miklo presented information. KANNER VOTE AT JCCOG After discussion, a majority of Council directed staff to prepare a resolution starting the procedure to remove Council Member Kanner from his JCCOG appointment for the next meeting. STAFF ACTION: Resolution will be on October 8 agenda. (Karr) COUNCIL TIME 1. (Items #18a & 18b - Appointments to Airport Zoning Board of Adjustment and Airport Zoning Commission) Council Member Vanderhoef reported on a discussion with Asst. City Atty. Dulek and stated there appeared no way to change the make-up of the Commissions. 2, In response to Council Member Kanner, the City Manager stated he has asked the Public Works Director t provide a better schedule of the new water plant opening, noting it was hoped that the plant would begin producing water after the first of the year. 3. In response to Council Member Champion, the City Mgr. stated construction of Scott Boulevard was right on schedule for November 1. 4. Council Member O'Donnell stated he felt Council Member Kanner staying in Cedar Rapids rather than driving back to Iowa City was an abuse and misuse of taxpayer dollars. Council Member Kanner indicated he probably would not do it next time but there were some late night events and some early morning events he felt it was worthwhile. Meeting adjourned 9:55 PM. Marian Karr From: Kumi Morris Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 2:49 PM To: Rick Fosse; Chuck Schmadeke; Steve Atkins; *City Council Cc: Tim Schroeder (E-mail); Joe Fowler; Chris O'Brien; Barb Coffey Subject: Masonry Institute Award for Tower Place and Parking Good Morning, I was at the Iowa AIA (American Institute of Architects) Conference at the end of last week and the Tower Place and Parking Facility was awarded the "2002 Masonry Institute of Iowa - Grand Award". The building was entered by Neumann Monson Architects. This is considered one of the most prestigious architecture awards announced at the Iowa annual AIA conference and it is a very competitive competition with a number of honorable mentions. It is good to see a City of Iowa City municipal structure taking home the grand prize. Tim Schroeder, the architect at Neumann Monson, also let me know that the building won best in its class from the International Parking Institute. Kumi Morris Kumi Morris Architecture Services Coo~dinalor C~ty of Iowa City Engineering Division 3193565044 319356 5007 [fax] kumi-morns@iowa-city org IP6 CITY MUNICIPAL AIRPORT South Riverside Drive Iowa City, Iowa 52246 , A. September 24, 2002 Ms. Nicoletta Oliver Federal Aviation Administration Airports Division ACE-615C 901 Locust Kansas City, Missouri 64106-2325 Dear Ms. Oliver: The Iowa City Airport Commission is submitting a request for a ~Release of Airport Property". Although none of the property requested for release was purchased with Federal Aviation Administration funding, we realize that when a grant assurance is signed, you consider the entire airport as a unit. Included with this request are copies of the airport property map, an airport layout plan, an appraisal establishing fair market value, and plat maps of the commercial subdivision. The Airport Layout Plan for Iowa City is currently being updated, but the area requested for release is not affected by the update. On the final plat map, there are three outlots listed. The request for release does not include outlots B or C. Those lots are considered part of the safety areas for Runway 25. It was the Commission's original intent to lease the lots on a long-term basis. Because of several local real estate conditions, this has not been a successful option. There are perspective tenants that are willing to buy the property, but are not interested in leasing. In an effort to reduce its capital debt, the Commission would like the option to sell or lease the property. The Commission and the City Council realize that any money generated on or by the airport is to be used for airport purposes. The money generated from sale or lease of the 54 acres of airport property would be used to reduce capital improvement debt or for airport operations. If a release is granted, the Commission has a tenant that would like to purchase property and begin construction immediately. The Commission would appreciate a response from you as soon as possible. You may contact me at (319) 354-3040 or Ron O'Neil, the Airport Manager at (319) 356-5045, e-mail at ron-oneil~iowa-citv, org If you need additional information, please contact Ron O'Neil. The Commission's goal is to have the airport as self-sufficient as possible and we believe this is a step toward that goal. Sincerely/.. ~ I~¢#'a-City Airport Commission Cc: Airport Commission Ron O'Neil, Airport Manager City Council Steve Atkins, City Manager Sue Dulek, Assistant City Attorney APR.-12' 02{FRI) 05:35 FAA/AIRPORTS/AGE~600 TEL:S16 329 2611 P. O02 K~LEASE OF ASSORT PROPERTY ~ Any release, modification, reformation or amendment of an airport agreement between the owner ~nd the United States must be based on a request made in writing, and signed by a duly autho~rized official of'tbs public agency that owns thc airport. 1. NI~I~B/:]{ OF COlqlrA~. One copy et'material should be sub~rted to the Abports Division, FAA, by the :2. ~O~ OF WRITTEN OWNER REOUEST AJthoush no special form is required, an owner's request should be speci~c, as applicable and known; a. What agreement(s) with the United States are involved. b. W~at is requested. c. WIu the release, modification, reformation or amendment is requested. d. What facts and circumstances ju~ the request. e. What requirements of'state or local law or ordinance should be provided ~or in the language of' an FAA issued document if the request is consented to or granted. f What property or facilities are involved. ~ How the property was acqui~-d or obtained by the ak'pon owns. h. Wirer is the present condition and whet present usc is made of'any property or facilities involved. i. What use or disposition will be made of tbs propet'ty or facilities. j. Wbat is the appraised f'air market value of'the property or facillties. Appraisais or other evidence m~uimi to estshtLsh fair market vaJue. k What proceeds arc expected f~om the use or disposition of the property and what will be done with any net revenues derived. L A comparison of the relative advantage or benefit to the a~rport ~om sale or other disposition as opposed to retention for rental income. 3, FJt'RrRI'rs lO_BE lru'RNISHED BY OWNER_ Ear,,h copy of the request should have attached two (2) scaled dmwlnl~s showing ail airport Property and airport facilities which are currently obligated t'or airport purposes by agreements with the United States. O~ exhiblt~ supporting or justifies the request, such as maps, photographs, plans and appraisal reports, shall be attached, as appropriate, 4. AIRPORT LAYOUT PLAN_ A revised Airport Layout Plan (ALP) must be prepared w~ch reflects the changes to land areas and airport facilities attendant to tl~s action. Accompanying tl~s drswing(s) should be a brief narrative whi~ outlines the rationale used in arriving at thc revised plan. i.e,, crosswind coverage with only the N/S and N'9//SE runways, taxiing patterns to be established, how denrenca lines were established, and what kind ofaircreR and numbers ofoperatlons were sssumed in preparing the plan. ITEMS L, J. and k. NOT REQUIRED FOR RELEASE OF MAINTENANCE OBLIGATIONS ONLY. REQUEST FOR RELEASE OF AIRPORT PROPERTY IOWA CITY MUNIClpL AIRPORT a. AlP 3-19-0047-02 through 3-19-0047-09 b. Release of 54 acres, +/- to sell c. The 2000 Airport Master Plan, with subsequent updates of the ALP drawings, indicates that this area will not be used for aviation uses. Runway 18/36 is scheduled to be closed and a 1000 foot primary surface for Runway 07/25 has been reserved to allow for the installation of a precision approach. d. Like most municipal governments, the City of Iowa City has limited financial resources. The Airport Commission has developed the Aviation Commerce Park to generate income for the Airport and reduce the amount of funding required from the City's General Fund. The Commission had anticipated leasing the property on long term leases to provide a steady income for the operating budget. The concept of long-term leasing has not been accepted very well in the local real estate market and the Commission would like the flexibility of either leasing or selling the property. Selling the property would not meet the long-term financial goal of the Airport but would provide relief by reducing the capital improvements debt at the Airport. Retiring or reducing the bonded debt for Airport Buildings would allow that money to be direetexl to the operating budget. The tax revenue generated by businesses locating on the former Airport property could be credited to the amount of funds required f~om the General Fund for Airport operations. e. The Airport property will not affect Iowa Depaflment of Transportation grant assurances and will not affect local Airport zoning regulations. fi There are approximately 54 acres of property involved. There are no Airport structures on the property proposed to be leased or sold. g. All of the property for which the Commission is requesting a release was purchase with local funding. A City street runs east to west through the center of the property. There are two parcels on the east edge of the property that was purchased with FAA funding. (AIP 3-19-0047-07 and 3-19-0047-08). They were purchased for the Runway Protection Zone and safety areas for Runway 25 and are not included in the waiver request. h. The present use of the property is a platted commercial subdivision. Before the road and utilities were installed, the property was used for agricultural row crops. The latest ALP shows that the threshold for Runway 18 has been relocated and none of the RPZ for Runway 18 overlays the property named in the request for release. The property will be used for a commercial subdivision. Adequate covenants, codes and restrictions will be included in all leases or sales documents to protect the aviation interests of the Airport. i. An appraisal was conducted for the property to determine fair market value and is included with the other requested attachments. j. The proceeds from any sales will first be used to pay any capital debt. The capital debt of the Airport is from four hangar buildings built since 1995. In addition, the agreement with the Council requires the Commission to reimburse the City of Iowa City for the int~asl~ucture for the 54-acre subdivision. The amount of that project was $1,269,748. All funds generated from the sale or lease of the property will be credited to the Airport and used for capital or operating expenses. 1. As was stated earlier, it was the Commission's original intention to lease the property. Although it would have taken a longer time period to recover the cost of the inbastructure, it would have provided for a more constant revenue stream. Because of the availability of several other new commercial developments in the Iowa City area, the Commission could not be competitive by only leasing the property. Interested tenants wanted to purchase the property instead of long-term leases. By having the option to sell or lease, the Commission should be able to reduce the bonded debt and have funds available for operating expenses. IP7 2411 Tudor Drive Iowa City, Iowa 52245 September 27, 2002 Mr. Tom Brase, Director SEATS 2000 James Street, Suite 111 Coralville, Iowa 52241 Dear Ms. Brase: Our daughter, Sarah Riesz, has moved to a supported living house at 2307 Catskill Court. This letter outlines our request for her transportation by SEATS, as in the past, from November 15th until the weather improves, probably March 15th. She works at Target in Coralville on Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday mornings. She works at Iowa State Bank, downtown, every afternoon. She goes to Nautilus workout center on Monday and Friday mornings. Bel~innin~ November 15m from 2307 Catskill Court: pick up so that she arrives at Target no later than 8:20 AM, and no earlier than 8:05 AM. Suggested window: Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, pick -up between 7:35 AM - 8:05 AIV~ Bellinnin~ December 1*t add--from 2307 Catskill Court: Mornings ' Monday: arrive at Nautilus between 9:15 and 9:30 AM (9:30 ideal) Suggested window: 8:45 - 9:15 AM Friday: arrive at Nautilus between 8:20 and 8:40 AM. (8:30 ideal) Suggested window: 7:55 AM - 8:25 AM Afternoons: return to Catskill Monday pick-up at Iowa State Bank: between 3:45 and 4:15 PM. Sarah leaves work earlier that day for a cooking lesson at home. Tuesday through Friday: pick-up at Iowa State Bank between 4:15 and 4:45 PM. The above were part of her ride system l~om home last year. With regard to ride parameters issued last year: 1. We assume that the scheduling is arranged for "Requests for Drop-offTime." ']?his is important, since Sarah must punch in at Target T, W, Th at 8:30 A.M. and on Friday at the bank at 1:00 p.m. 2. In reading the guidelines, it appears that when drop-ofttimes are the basis for scheduling, that a person can arrive 2 hours prior to the request. Please clarify that the guideline means that Sarah could arrive at Target at 6:20 AM. I hope is not the case. 3. We can work within the 30 minute window for pick-up.. 4. We recognize that weather may sometimes interfere with service regularity. 5. We recognize that there may be a 55 - minute permissible ride. Hopefully this will occur rarely. Please confirm with us by letter and with the Catskill House the SEATS schedule. As you know, after two unreliable years, last year's service went well. We look forward to a smooth beginning to this winter's service and acknowledge that it is a shared service. Sincerely, Elizabeth D. Riesz Peter C. Riesz Co-Guardian Cc: Joe Fowler, Director, Iowa City Parking and Transit Ron Logsden, Manager, Iowa City Transit Johnson County Board of' Supervisors (plcas~ copy for Board) ~rnie Lehman, Mayor (please copy for City Council) Nicole Sheldon, Cas~ Manager, Dept. of Human Services Jemmine Scandridge, Co-Director, Rural Employment Alternatives Ron Sahiefter, Director, Reach £or Your Potential (354-2983) Sarah Reisetter, Service Coordinator, Catskill House Catskill House telephone: 351-9459 Catskill address 2307 Catskill Court (52245) ~~~ IP8 BUILDING PERMIT INFORMATION September 2002 KEY FOR ABBREVIATIONS · Type of Improvement: ADD- Addition ALT- Alteration REP - Repair FND - Foundation Only NEW- New OTH. Other type of construction Type of Use: RSF- Residential Single Family RDF - Residential Duplex RMF - Three or more residential RA C - Residential Accessory Building MJX- Mixed NON- Non-residential OTH- Other V~e: 2 City of Iowa City Dat~: 10/1/2002 Extraction of Building Permit Data for To: 9/1/2002 CelISUS Bureau ~. t~ ,L ~> e"o~ From: 9/30/2002 Type Type Permit Number Name Address Impr Use Stories Units Valuation BLD02-00577 OWENS-ILLINOIS 2515 INDEPENDENCE RD ADD NON 1 1 $1,900,000 80,000 SQ FT ADDITION TO PLASTICS FACTORY BLD02-00448 PROCTER & GAMBLE 2200 LOWER MUSCAT1NE ADD NON 2 1 $992,950 39,710 SQ FT WAREHOUSE ADDITION TO MANUFACTURING PLANT BLD02-00349 ROBERTS DAIRY COMPAN5 1109 N DODGE ST ADD NON 1 1 $41,500 ENCLOSE LOADING DOCKS Total ADD/NON permits: 3 Total Valuation: $2,934,450 i BLD02-00628 NEPTUNE LAND COMPANY 410 RENO ST ADD RDF 1 1 $7,717 BEDROOM ADDITION TO RDF UNIT Total ADD/RDF permits: I Total Valuation: $7,717I BLD02-00578 ANN YORK 437 HUTCHINSON AVE ADD RSF 2 1 $80,000 ADDITION TO SFD BLD02-00649 DAVID E BELL 1809 GLEASON AVE ADD RSF 1 1 $40,000 ADDITION TO SFD BLD02-00573 WAYNE STAGG 1220 KEOKUK ST ADD RSF 1 1 $31,000 3 SEASON PORCH ADDITION TO SFD BLD02-00603 TERRY WAHLS 1215 SANTA FE DR ADD RSF 2 1 $29,937 ADDITION TO SFD BLD02-00630 MARY NESS 1312 BROOKWOOD DR ADD RSF 2 1 $10,000 3 SEASON PORCH ADDITION TO SFD BLD02-00593 EMIL MARTIN 420 4TH AVE ADD RSF 2 1 $8,900 SCREEN PORCH ADDITION TO SFD BLD02-00641 JEAN REESE 1111 KEOKUK ST ADD RSF 1 1 $6,000 SCREEN PORCH ADDITION TO SFD BLD02-00611 CARLA JENNINGS 3035 COURT ST ADD RSF 1 1 $4,500 DECK ADDITION TO SFD BLD02-00650 KIRK DEUTSCH 4644 CANTERBURY CT ADD RSF 1 1 $3,500 DECK ADDITION TO SFD BLD02-00592 JEFFREY & TRACT LIEBER3 1363 SANTA FE DR ADD RSF 1 0 $3,165 DECK ADDITION TO SFD BLD02-00629 CHRIS A BOWERS & MICHEl 205 W BENTON ST ADD RSF 2 1 $3,000 DECK ADDITION TO SFD BLD02-00618 LISA CRAWFORD 131 FRIENDSHIP ST ADD RSF 2 2 $2,990 DECK ADDITION TO SFD BLD02-00567 CRAIG FOBIAN 938 COTTONWOOD AVE ADD RSF 1 1 $2,250 GARAGE ADDITION TO SFD BLD02-00635 KELLY CLIFTON 422 S 7TH AVE ADD RSF 2 1 $1,200 DECK ADDITION TO SFD BLD02-00633 JIM BUXTON 715 WALNUT ST ADD RSF 2 1 $500 ENTRY DECK AND STAIRS FOR SFD TotalADD/RSF permits: 15 Total Valuation: $226,9421[ 1 P~e: 3 City of Iowa City Date: 10/1/2002 Extraction of Building Permit Data for To: 9/1/2002 Census Bureau Report From: 9/30/2002 Type Type Permit Number Name Address Impr U__~ Stories Units Valuation BLD02-00581 MARNET PROPERTIES 218 WASHINGTON ST ALT MIX 3 0 $4,000 INTERIOR ALTERATION DEMO FOR REMODEL I Total ALT/MIX permits = 1 Total Valuation: $4,000 ] BLD02-00495 MIKE GLICK 2302 MUSCAT1NE AVE ALT NON 1 1 $50,000 TAKE OUT RESTAURANT 1N 1/2 OF PREVIOUS RETAIL STORE BLD02-00602 MONKEY HOUSE 1604 SYCAMORE ST ALT NON 2 4 $32,000 ALTERATION OF RESTAURANT BLD02-00584 KADING, SCOTT WAYNE 13 -15 S LINN ST ALT NON 3 1 $20,000 RESTAURANT IN EXISTING BASEMENT TENANT SPACE BLD02-00583 BLIMPIE SUBS 2221 ROCHESTER AVE ALT NON 2 0 $1,000 iNSTALL NONBEARING WALL AND DOOR BLD02-00621 AFSCME LOCAL 12 1700 S IST AVE #19 ALT NON 2 1 $1,000 CHANGE OF USE FROM MERCANTILE TO BUSINESS/ASSEMBLY USE BLD02-00627 MUSICIANS PRO SHOP 200 S LINN ST ALT NON 2 1 $1,000 INTERIOR FINISH OF TENANT SPACE BLD02-00575 BONNIE DODDS 1700 S 1ST AVE #20 ALT NON 2 2 $700 RESTORE TENANT PARTITION TO ORIGINAL CONFIGURATION BLD01-00805 JOHNSON COUNTY 913 S DUBUQUE ST ALT NON I 1 $0 LOCKS FOR MAIN ENTRY DOOR [ TOtalALT/NON permits :8 TotalValuafion: $1os,7ooI BLD02-00604 JAMES LUTH 1009 N SUMMIT ST ALT RDF 2 1 $2,000 BASEMENT BATH OF RDF UNIT ] TotalALT/RDF permits: 1 Total Valuation: $2,000 I BLD02-00608 HARVEY MILLER 809 IOWA AVE ALT RMF 2 1 $1,500 INSTALL DWELLING SEPARATION To~al ALT/RMF permits: 1 Total Valuation: $1,500 I BLD02-00509 MARK AND DIANE RUSSO 614 CLARK ST ALT RSF 2 I $40,000 INTERIOR ALTERATION/CHANGE OF USE FROM CHURCH TO SFD BLD02-00591 BRADLEY J CAHOON 24 QUINCENT CT ALT RSF 1 0 $30,000 BASEMENT FINISH OF SFD BLD02-00600 OWINGS, RONALD D 2225 COURT ST ALT RSF I 2 $10,000 COMPLETE FINISH WORK OF S.F.D. ADDITION BLD02-00519 RODNEY CHRISTIANSON 521 MELROSE AVE ALT RSF 3 0 $9,000 BASEMENT FINISH OF SFD BLD02-00551 BRUCE & ANDREA KOUT 4736 UNVERNESS CT ALT RSF 2 1 $3,450 STORM WINDOWS FOR SFD BLD02-00607 JAMES & BETH PETERSON 309 N 7TH AVE ALT RSF 1 I $2,500 BATHROOM REMODEL OF SFD Page: 4 City of Iowa City o~: 10/1/2002 Extraction of Building Permit Data for To: 9/1/2002 Census Bureau From: 9/30/2002 Type Type Permit Number Name Address Impr Use Stories Units Valuation BLD02-00617 NANCY DOWNING & MARK 10 GLENDALE CT ALT RSF I 1 $2,500 BASEMENT EGRESS WINDOW 1N SFD BLD02-00546 BRENDA CRUIKSHANK 1109 CARVER ST ALT RSF 3 0 $2,000 BASEMENT BATHROOM BLD02-00606 JOHN SEGRETO 2919 EASTWOOD DR ALT RSF 3 1 $2,000 BASEMENT BATHROOM FOR RSF BLD02-00626 PUTNAM, KELLEY L 2025 LITTLE CREEK LN ALT RSF 2 1 $200 INSTALL FIXED PANE OF GLASS BETWEEN POOL ROOM AND CLOSET Total ALT/RSF permits:10 Total Valuation: $101,650 BLD02-00605 DAVID OZOLINS & CHERYL 1131 E BURLINGTON ST FND RSF 3 4 $5,600 FOUNDATION FOR 2 STORY HOUSE ADDITION Total FND/RSF permits: 1 Total Valuation: $5,600 BLD02-00568 IOWA PAPER & CHEMICAL 101 ESCORT LN NEW NON 1 I $192,730 7800 SQ FT SALES AND WAREHOUSE BUILDING M, S-1 OCCUPANCIES Total NEW/NON permits: I Total Valuation: $192,730 i BLD02-00497 A M MANAGEMENT 2049 KOUNTRY LANE NEW RAC 1 0 $40,000 10 CAR GARAGE FOR RMF BLD02-00498 A M MANAGEMENT 2073 KOUNTRY LANE NEW P-,AC 1 0 $32,000 8 CAR DETACHED GARAGE FOR RMF BLD02-00502 A M MANAGEMENT 2111 KOUNTRY LANE NEW RAC 1 0 $24,000 6 CAR DETACHED GARAGE FOR RMF BLD02-00500 A M MANAGEMENT 2137 KOUNTRY LANE NEW RAC 1 0 $16,000 4 CAR DETACHED GARAGE FOR RMF BLD02-00501 A M MANAGEMENT 2061 KOUNTRY LANE NEW RAC 1 0 $16,000 4 CAR DETACHED GARAGE FOR RMF BLD02-00579 GARRET & JEANETTE LOCK 155 STANWYCK DR NEW RAC 1 1 $11,664 DETACHED STORAGE ADDITION TO SFD BLD02-00610 MAP, DINE PRICE 1307 COLLEGE ST NEW RAC 1 0 $8,000 DETACHED GARAGE ADDITION FOR SFD BLD02-00615 DAYLE CAMPBELL & KELL] 431 ELMRIDGE AVE NEW RAC I 1 $1,300 STORAGE SHED FOR SFD Total NEW/RAC permits :8 Total Valuation: $148,964 ~ BLD02-00601 L & H DEVELOPMENT 2609 -11 CATSKILL CT NEW RDF 2 2 $255,300 RDF WITH ATTACHED 2 CAR GARAGES BLD02-00612 FRANTZ CONSTRUCTION C~ 1587 STAFFORD PL NEW RDF 1 2 $195,849 RDF WITH ATTACHED 2 CAR GARAGES Taal NEW/RDF permits: 2 Total Valuation: $451,149 II 1 V~ge: 5 City of Iowa City Dat~: 10/1/20o2 Extraction of Building Permit Data for To: 9/1/2002 Census Bureau ~ t'~,[ From: 9/30/2002 Type Type Permit Number Name Address lmpr Use Stories Units Valuation BLD02-00485 JIM MILLER 2743 TRIPLE CROWN NEW RMF 3 12 $774,640 3 Story, 12 plex condo with 2 bedroom units and 4 attached 3 stall garages Building G BLD02-00596 ARLINGTON DEVELOPMEN' 214 CAMDEN ROAD NEW RMF 2 4 $644,123 RMF WITH ATTACHED 2 CAR GARAGES 214-216-218-220 CAMDEN ROAD BLD02-00597 ARLINGTON DEVELOPMEN' 234 CAMDEN ROAD NEW RMF 2 4 $644,123 RMF WITH ATTACHED 2 CAR GARAGES 234-236-238-240 CAMDEN ROAD BLD02-00598 ARJ~INGTON DEVELOPMEN' 254 CAMDEN ROAD NEW RMF 2 4 $644,123 RMF WITH ATTACHED 2 CAR GARAGES 254-256-258-260 CAMDEN ROAD Total NEW/RMF permits: 4 Total Valuation: $2,707,009 i BLD02-00599 H B H DEVELOPMENT INC 311 GREEN MOUNTAIN DI NEW RSF 2 1 $240,000 SFD WITH ATTACHED 2 CAR GARAGE BLD02-00587 ARLINGTON DEVELOPMEN' 575 HUNTINGTON DR NEW RSF 1 1 $213,960 SFD WITH ATTACHED 3 CAR GARAGE BLD02-00588 ARLINGTON DEVELOPMEN' 605 HUNTINGTON DR NEW RSF 1 1 $211,174 SFD WITH ATTACHED 3 CAR GARAGE BLD02-00580 GREATER IOWA CITY HOU5 4120 ROHRET ROAD NEW RSF 1 1 $154,199 SFD WITH ATTACHED 2 CAR GARAGE BLD02-00620 STEVE BRENNEMAN 1621 WETHERBY DR NEW RSF 1 1 $153,256 SFD WITH ATTACHED 2 CAR GARAGE BLD02-00595 IOWA VALLEY HABITAT FC 3005 COURT ST NEW RSF 1 1 $120,559 SFD BLD02-00632 NEW DIMENSION HOMES O 289 PADDOCK CIR NEW RSF I 1 $25,000 Poured foundations for manufactured home and construction of a 24 x 24 attached garage and 4 x 6 stoop. BLD02-00634 NEW DIMENSION HOMES O 350 PALOMINO CT NEW RSF 1 1 $18,000 Pier footings for manufactured housing trait and a 22 x 24 attached garage. Total NEW/RSF permits: 8 Total Valuation: $1,136,148 i BLD02-O0613 DANIEL J & JULIE M EWER'I 314 S GOVERNOR ST OTH RAC I 0 $1,000 MOVE EXISTING GARAGE TO REAR OF LOT Total OTH/RAC permits: 1 Total Valuation: $1,000 BLD02-00585 MIRR, RONALD K 1025 PENKRIDGE DR OTH RSF 1 1 $2,800 FENCE FOR SFD Total OTH/RSF permits: 1 Total Valuation: $2,800 i BLD02-00594 MARVIN SWAFFORD 620 S RIVERSIDE DR REP NON I 1 $8,000 REROOF COMMERCIAL BUILDING Page: 6 City of Iowa City Date: 10/1/2002 Extraction of Building Permit Dam for To: 9/1/2002 Census Bureau x~ ~, iL t) e~o~' From: 9/30/2002 Type Type Permit Number Name Address lmpr Use Stories Units Valuation Total REP/NON permits: 1 Total Valuation: $8,000 ] BLD02-00494 SOUTH LIBERTY INC 302 MELROSE CT REP RDF 2 1 $600 EXTERIOR STAIRS FOR RDF UNIT Total REP/RDF permits: I Total Valuation: $600 I BLD02-00582 STEVE & CHRIS HEDLUND 215 FAIRCHILD ST REP RMF 2 0 $! 1,000 RESIDiNG OF RMF BLD02-00538 PRG PROPERTIES 827 MARKET ST P,.EP RMF 0 0 $4,295 WINDOW REPLACEMENT IN RMF Total REP/RMF permits: 2 Total Valuation: $15,295 ~ BLD02-00625 GILBERT J ICLAPPER LIViN£ 804 RONALDS ST REP RSF 1 0 $10,250 REPLACE 14' OF SOUTHEAST CORNER OF BASEMENT BLD02-00590 ROCCO WAGNER 1103 4TH AVE REP RSF 1 1 $10,000 ROOF REPAIR OF SFD BLD02-00589 STEVEN VANDER WOUDE 309 CHURCH ST REP RSF 3 1 $800 DECK REPAIR OF SFD Total REP/RSF permits: 3 Total Valuation: $21,050 ~ I GRAND TOTALS: PERMITS: 73 VALUATION: $8,o74,3o41 Dee Vanderhoef From: Breineymom~aol.com Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 3:57 PM To: dee_vanderhoef~iowa-city.org Subject: Concerned parent Dee-I have a freshman at the Univeristy of Iowa. In the past 10 days he has received 2 tickets for underage drinking and has spent 2 nights in jail. His father and I are upset with him, are making him pay his own fines, requiring him to get a job to cover his additional expenses rather than the initial plan that he would not work his first semester of school. We are requiring him to take steps to correct his behavior. We would like the city of Iowa City to take ownership for its behavior. Both nights that Jake (our son) has been ticketed-he has been drinking in a bar in downtown Iowa City. He has not been ID'd, and the first night he was arrested right outside the bar. The city of Iowa City has a pretty good racket going. The merchants rake in 1000's each night from the underage drinkers, and then the government of your city rakes in 1000's of dollars each night in fines. There were 6 college kids in jail with Jake on a Monday night-with an average of $150 dollar fine each-that $900's in fines-on a Monday-which would have to be a slow night. I would like data on how many tickets are given to local ddnking establishments-I may be wreng-but I can't think it is many or the serving of beer would decrease. If there is a "crack-down" going on, let's crack down on the folks making a preflt, not the minors. Shame on you and shame on your city if this is allowed to continue. Again, my son is responsible for his actions and needs to change his behavior. So do you. Brenda Rainey Glenwood, Iowa