Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1979-07-03 Regular MeetingREGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF JULY 3, 1979 �Feh Mar�Apr M31IINl IUI IA TO �iLE 213 a 5 6 7 8 IN5ERT. YO'.E 5iGNAL ROLL CALL REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF JULY 3. 1979 7:30 P.M. PRESENT ABSENT BALMER dePROSSE ERDAHL NEUHAUSER PERRET ROBERTS VEVERA MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOIIIES ,i i II i I � I . N I i; 1 4, i< v. ROLL CALL REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF JULY 3. 1979 7:30 P.M. PRESENT ABSENT BALMER dePROSSE ERDAHL NEUHAUSER PERRET ROBERTS VEVERA MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOIIIES ,i r` I� 1; r: 4, i< v. --, /1 COMPLETE DESCRIPTION OF COUNCIL ACTIVITIES JULY 3, 1979 Iowa City Council, reg. mtg., 7/3/79, 7:30 P.M. at the Civic enter. Mayor Vevera presiding. Councilmembers present: Balmer, eProsse, Neuhauser, Perret (7:35 P.M.), Roberts, Vevera. Absent: rdahl. Staffinembers present: Hayek, Berlin, Stolfus, Melling, Dietz, Dse, Brown, Karr. Council minutes tape recorded on Tape 79-17, Side 2, 361 -End, and Tape 79-20, Side 1, 1-842. Stolfus requested the addition of the Iowa City Airport Commission minutes of May 24, 1979, to the Consent Calendar. Perret arrived, 7:35 P.M. Balmer requested discussion of Airport Comm. minutes and Housing Appeals minutes of 5/10. Moved by deProsse, seconded by Balmer, that the following items and recommendations in the Consent Calendar be received, or approved, and/or adopted, as amended: Approval of Official Actions, reg, Council mtg., 6/19/79, subject to correction, as recommended by City Clerk. Minutes of Boards and Commiions: 0Riverfront Comm. -6/27/79; 3 ©Planning & Zoning Comm.-6/18/79;Numan Rights Comm. -5/30/79; to giousing Appeals Board -5/10/79, City Manager will check procedure on 1.34 enforcement of regulationss�--ppn single-family dwellings, fowiolation i3.S/a outlined in these min tes "Housing Appeals Board -5/18/79; Senior t.3 _S 3 Center Comm.-6/20/79�owa City Airport Comm. -5/24/79, after discus- 1:3 Sion, City Atty. Hayek was requested to research question raised onm 1355 City liability for Airport Comm. action, also for other Commissions' actions and report back. Permit Resolutions, Book 57, as recommended by City Clerk: RES. 79-290, p. 890, APPROVING CLASS C BEER SUNDAY SALES AND RES.- IA5G 79-291, p. 891, APPROVING CLASS C BEER PERMIT FOR VOSS PETROLEUM CO., INC. dba DISCOUNT DAN'S SHELL, 933 South Clinton. RES. 19- 292, APPROVING CIGARETTE PERMITS, pp. 892-893. l3 S 3 RES. 79-293, Bk. 57, p. 894, SETTING PUBLIC HEARING ON 7/17/79 ON PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, FORM OF CONTRACT AND ESTIMATE FOR THE 1.357 BLOCK 64 PARKING GARAGE. Correspondence: Petition for suspension of taxes for Opal _ 13 6, 0 Hochstetler, approved. Letter from Marilyn Turner regarding the alleged discrimination practices of Woodfield's Disco referred to _ 13 61 i' City Manager for reply. Affirmative roll call vote unanimous, 6/0, Erdahl absent. Mayor Vevera announced the public hearing as set. Recommendations from Planning & Zoning Comm. denying prel. planned area development plan of '1750 Rochester', noted. Larry Schnittjer 11562, appeared and reviewed street placement and stormwater basin on plat. l MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOInES Council Activities July 3, 1979 Page 2 Patt Cain, P & Z Commissioner, requested that the P & 2 Comm. be allowed to review any changes. Councilmembers will review the area. Moved by deProsse, seconded by Balmer, that the rule requiring that ordinances must be considered and voted on for passage at two Council meetings prior to the meeting at which it is to be finally passed be suspended, that the second consideration and vote be waived, and the ORDINANCE 79-2960, Bk. 15, pp. 87-89, AMENDING SECTIONS 8.10.35.1 AND 8.10.35.12A.2 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES BY ADDING PROVISIONS FOR COMMON 1 3 G 3 SIGNAGE, as approved by P & Z Comm., be voted upon for final passage at this time. Affirmative roll call vote unanimous, 6/0, Erdahl absent. Moved by Neuhauser, seconded by deProsse, that the ordinances be finally adopted at this time. Affirmative roll call vote unanimous, 6/0, Erdahl absent. Nancy Draper, representing Better Cab Co. requested an extension of the the trial period for the extended SEATS service, & pointed out ,,'/ problems encountered with Affirmative Action policy regarding insurance 1.3i, � coverage. H.R. Dir. Brown advised that the staff is investigating. Brad Meyer appeared. After staff report on resolution of the problem, Council will consider an extension. Public hearing on revised transit schedules, routings and rates was held. Those appearing with suggestions included: Brad Meyer, 840 Maggard; Dorothy Coon, 1409 Yewell; John Suchomel, 330k N. Lucas-, Steve Shupe, 740 Carriage Hill; Raymond Roe, 814 Jefferson; Aggie Albeneze , 1621 Wilson; Dan Fitzsimmons, 3104 Maplewood Lane; Pat Connally, 1007 N. Summit; Bill Harris, 1421 Ridge St. Mayor Vevera declared a five minute recess. After the meeting resumed, deProsse was noted as absent, 8:50 P.M. Mayor Vevera stated that there were four votes to not raise the rates. Changes in the routes will be discussed at the 7/16 meeting, with action on 7/17 meeting, so that staff can get the changes iTlegeented. Letter from Lee Dameron noted. keret imm c Munn9er re b u res. Public hearing was held on the plans, specifications, form of contract and estimate for the truck wash building at the Iowa City Service Center. No one appeared. Moved by Balmer, seconded by Roberts, to adopt Res. 79-294, Bk. 57, pp. 895-896, APPROVING PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, FORM OF CONTRACT AND ESTIMATE FOR THE TRUCK WASH BUILDING AND DIRECTING PUBLICATION OF NOTICEii G 7 TO BIDDERS, bids to be taken 7/26/79. Affirmative roll call vote unanimous, 5/0, deProsse and Erdahl absent. Public hearing on plans and specifications for the South Gilbert Street Improvement Project, FAUS Project No. UST -M -4051(1)--8U-52. No one appeared. Moved by Roberts, seconded by Perret, to adopt Res. 79-295, Bk. 57, pp. 897-898, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND AUTHORIZE BIDS TO BE TAKEN FOR SOUTH GILBERT STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, at Ames on 8/14/79. Affirmative roll call vote unanimous, 5/0, deProsse and Erdahl absent. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES Council Activities July 3, 1979 Page 3 Public hearing was held on the Resolution of Necessity for 1979 Street Improvements (Tanglewood Street - Ventura Avenue). Moved by Neuhauser, seconded by Perret,that the letters from Bruce Glasgow and William Casey be made a part of the public hearing. Motion carried unanimously, 5/0. Mrs. Evelyn Jensen, 2050 N. Dubuque; Daniel Berg, 40 Ventura; and Damien Pieper, 35 Ventura, voiced objections to the project. I.3 7 Quentin Pitzen, 2040 Tanglewood, also appeared. Because a 3/4 vote of Council was needed to adopt the Res. of Necessity and only 5 members were present, it was moved by Neuhauser, seconded by Perret, that Council action on said Res. of Necessity, all objections made or filed thereto and all other matters related or incidental thereto be deferred and continued to a meeting of the Council, to be held on the 17th day of i July, 1979, at 7:30 o'clock P.M. in the Council Chambers, that the Council retains jurisdiction of said Resolution of Necessity, objections thereto, and other related matters for consideration and action theron at said adjourned meeting. Motion carried unanimously, 5/0, deProsse and Erdahl absent. Staff will investigate So see if one ethe parcels has been sold. rl" 11 t Riverfront Comm. recommendation upgrading Sturgis Corner boat ramp site noted. Moved by Neuhauser, seconded by Roberts, to employ Stanley 1!371 Consultants to study the Sturgis Ferry sites (north and south) and make a recommendation regarding feasibility of a ramp. Affirmative roll call i vote unanimously, 5/0, deProsse and Erdahl absent. Senior Center Commission recommendation regarding the preliminary design plans for the Senior Center, noted. Moved by Perret, seconded by 1.3 7 Neuhauser, to direct the architects, Weliner, Nowysz, Pattschull & Pfiffner, to draft final plans for the Senior Center. Affirmative rgy11 call vote unanimous, 5/0, deProsse and Erdahl absent. Site plan wtfached. Mayor Vevera announced two vacancies: 1) Committee on Community Needs for an unexpired term ending March 1, 1980; 2) Housing Comm. for 11 an unexpired term ending May 1, 1980. These appointments will be made at the 8/14/79 meeting. City Manager Berlin pointed out that the proposed salary for the City Clerk was not in line with the administrative pay plan and should be increased by $673.00 per year. Moved by Neuhauser, seconded by 13 IS r Balmer, to increase the City Clerk's annual salary by $673.00 (total $20,673). Affirmative roll call vote unanimous, 5/0, deProsse and Erdahl absent. Moved by Balmer, seconded by Neuhauser, to adopt Res. 79-296, Bk. 57, pp. 899-902, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO SIGN AN AGREEMENT AMENDMENT 13 7 FOR THE BLOCK G4 DESIGN CONTRACT INCREASING THE FEE FROM $81,000 to $89,000. Affirmative roll call vote unanimous, 5/0, deProsse and Erdahl absent. Moved by Balmer, seconded by Perret, to adopt Res. 79-297, Bk. 57, _13 7 7 p. 903, ESTABLISHING POSITION BY PAY PLAN FOR CLASSIFIED PERSONNEL OF MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIos.DES rdo1NES COMPLETE DESCRIPTION OF COUNCIL ACTIVITIES JULY 3, 1979 Iowa City Council, reg. mtg., 7/3/79, 7:30 P.M. at the Civic Center. Mayor Vevera presiding. Councilmembers present: Balmer, deProsse, Neuhauser, Perret (7:35 P.M.), Roberts, Vevera. Absent: Erdahl. Staffinembers present: Hayek, Berlin, Stolfus, Helling, Dietz, Mose, Brown, Karr. Council minutes tape recorded on Tape 79-17, Side 2, 2061 -End, and Tape 79-20, Side 1, 1-842. Stolfus requested the addition of the Iowa City Airport Commission minutes of May 24, 1979, to the Consent Calendar. Perret arrived, 7:35 P.M. Balmer requested discussion of Airport Comm. minutes and Housing Appeals minutes of 5/10. Moved by deProsse, seconded by Balmer, that the following items and recommendations in the Consent Calendar be received, or approved, and/or adopted, as amended: Approval of Official Actions, reg. Council mtg., 6/19/79, subject to correction, as recommended by City Clerk. Minutes of Boards and Commissions: Riverfront Comm. -6/27/79; Planning & Zoning Comm. -6/18/79; Human Rights Comm. -5/30/79; Housing Appeals Board -5/10/79, City Manager will check procedure on 1 enforcement of regulations on single-family dwellings, for violation outlined in these minutes; Housing Appeals Board -5/18/79; Senior Center Comm. -6/20/79; Iowa City Airport Comm. -5/24/79, after discus- sion, City Atty. Hayek was requested to research question raft id on City liability for Airport Comm. action, also for other Commissions' actions and report back. Permit Resolutions, Book 57, as recommended by City Clerk: RES. 79-290, p. 890, APPROVING CLASS C BEER SUNDAY SALES AND RES. 79-291, p. 891, APPROVING CLASS C BEER PERMIT FOR VOSS PETROLEUM CO., INC. dba DISCOUNT DAN'S SHELL, 933 South Clinton. RES. 79- 292, APPROVING CIGARETTE PERMITS, pp. 892-893. RES. 79-293, Bk. 57, p. 894, SETTING PUBLIC HEARING ON 7/17/79 ON PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, FORM OF CONTRACT AND ESTIMATE FOR THE BLOCK 64 PARKING GARAGE. Correspondence: Petition for suspension of taxes for Opal Hochstetler, approved. Letter from Marilyn Turner regarding the alleged discrimination practises of Woodfield's Disco referred to City Manager for reply. Affirmative roll call vote unanimous, 6/0, Erdahl absent. Mayor Vevera announced the public hearing as ,.;et. Recommendations from Plannirrq & Zoning Comm. denying prel. planned area development plan of '1750 Rochester', noted. Larry Schnittjer i appeared and reviewed street placement and stormwater basin on plat. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DEs MOINES Council Activities July 3, 1979 -� Page 2 Patt Cain, P & Z Commissioner, requested that the P & Z Comm. be allowed to review any changes. Councilmembers will review the area. Moved by deProsse, seconded by Balmer, that the rule requiring that ordinances must be considered and voted on for passage at two Council meetings prior to the meeting at which it is to be finally passed be suspended, that the second consideration and vote be waived, and the ORDINANCE 79-2960, Bk. 15, pp. 87-89, AMENDING SECTIONS 8.10.35.1 AND 8.10.35.12A.2 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES BY ADDING PROVISIONS FOR COMMON SIGNAGE, as approved by P & Z Comm., be voted upon for final passage at this time. Affirmative roll call vote unanimous, 6/0, Erdahl absent. Moved by Neuhauser, seconded by deProsse, that the ordinances be finally adopted at this time. Affirmative roll call vote unanimous, 6/0, Erdahl absent. Nancy Draper, representing Better Cab Co. requested an extension of the the trial period for the extended SEATS service, & pointed out problems encountered with Affirmative Action policy regarding insurance coverage. H.R. Dir. Brown advised that the staff is investigating. Brad Meyer appeared. After staff report on resolution of the problem, Council will consider an extension. Public hearing on revised transit schedules, routings and rates was held. Those appearing with suggestions included: Brad Meyer, 840 Maggard; Dorothy Coon, 1409 Yewell; John Suchomel, 330h N. Lucas; Steve Shupe, 740 Carriage Hill; Raymond Roe, 814 Jefferson; Aggie Albeneze, 1621 Wilson; Dan Fitzsimmons, 3104 Maplewood Lane; Pat Connally, 1007 N. Summit; Bill Harris, 1421 Ridge St. Mayor Vevera declared a five minute recess. After the meeting resumed, deProsse was noted as absent, 8:50 P.M. Mayor Vevera stated that there were four votes to not raise the rates. Changes in the routes will be discussed at the 7/16 meeting, with action on 7/17 meeting, so that staff can get the changes implemented. Letter from Lee Dameron noted. Public hearing was held on the plans, specifications, form of contract and estimate for the truck wash building at the Iowa City Service Center. No one appeared. Moved by Balmer, seconded by Roberts, to adopt Res. 79-294, Bk. 57, pp. 895-896, APPROVING PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, FORM OF CONTRACT AND ESTIMATE FOR THE TRUCK WASH BUILDING AND DIRECTING PUBLICATION OF NOTICE TO BIDDERS, bids to be taken 7/26/79. Affirmative roll call vote unanimous, 5/0, deProsse and Erdahl absent. Public hearing on plans and specifications for the South Gilbert Street Improvement Project, FAUS Project No. UST-M-4051(1)--BU-52. No one appeared. Moved by Roberts, seconded by Perret, to adopt Res. 79-295, Bk. 57, TA897-898, KENFORSOAPPROVING PLANS NSPECIFICATIONS AUTHORIZE UTHGIILBERTSTREETIIMPROVEMENTPROJECT, atAmesonB8/14/79. Affirmative roll call vote unanimous, 5/0, deProsse and Erdahl absent. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES IIORICs Council Activities July 3, 1979 Page 3 Public hearing was held on the Resolution of Necessity for 1979 Street Improvements (Tanglewood Street - Ventura Avenue). Moved by Neuhauser, seconded by Perret,that the letters from Bruce Glasgow and William Casey be made a part of the public hearing. Motion carried unanimously, 5/0. Mrs. Evelyn Jensen, 2050 N. Dubuque; Daniel Berg, 40 Ventura; and Damien Pieper, 35 Ventura, voiced objections to the project. Quentin Pitzen, 2040 Tanglewood, also appeared. Because a 3/4 vote of Council was needed to adopt the Res. of Necessity and only 5 members were present, it was moved by Neuhauser, seconded by Perret that Council action on said Res. of Necessity, all objections made or filed thereto and all other matters related or incidental thereto be deferred and continued to a meeting of the Council, to be held on the 17th day of July, 1979, at 7:30 o'clock P.M. in the Council Chambers, that the Council retains jurisdiction of said Resolution of Necessity, objections thereto, and other related matters for consideration and action theron at said adjourned meeting. Motion carried unanimously, 5/0, deProsse and Erdahl absent. Staff will investigate to see if one of the parcels has been sold. Riverfront Comm. recommendation upgrading Sturgis Corner boat ramp site noted. Moved by Neuhauser, seconded by Roberts, to employ Stanley Consultants to study the Sturgis Ferry sites (north and south) and make a recommendation regarding feasibility of a ramp. Affirmative roll call vote unanimously, 5/0, deProsse and Erdahl absent. Senior Center Commission recommendation regarding the preliminary design plans for the Senior Center, noted. Moved by Perret, seconded by j Neuhauser, to direct the architects, Wehner, Nowysz, Pattschull & Pfiffner, to draft final plans for the Senior Center. Affirmative roll call vote unanimous, 5/0, deProsse and Erdahl absent. Mayor Vevera announced two vacancies: 1) Committee on Community Needs for an unexpired term ending March 1, 1980; 2) Housing Comm. for an unexpired term ending May 1, 1980. These appointments will be made at the 8/14/79 meeting. City Manager Berlin pointed out that the proposed salary for the City Clerk was not in line with the administrative pay plan and should be increased by $673.00 per year. Moved by Neuhauser, seconded by Balmer, to increase the City Clerk's annual salary by $673.00 (total $20,673). Affirmative roll call vote unanimous, 5/0, deProsse and Erdahl absent. Moved by Balmer, seconded by Neuhauser, to adopt Res. 79-296, Bk. 57, pp. 899-902, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO SIGN AN AGREEMENT AMENDMENT FOR THE BLOCK 64 DESIGN CONTRACT INCREASING THE FEE FROM $81,000 to $89,000. Affirmative roll call vote unanimous, 5/0, deProsse and Erdahl absent. Moved by Balmer, seconded by Perret, to adopt Res. 79-297, Bk. 57 p. 903, ESTABLISHING POSITION BY PAY PLAN FOR CLASSIFIED PERSONNEL OF MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES 110111ES fl� j Council Activities July 3, 1979 Page 4 THE CITY OF IOWA CITY, IOWA, FOR FY80. Resolution adopted, 4/1, with the following division of vote: Ayes: Balmer, Neuhauser, Perret, Roberts. Nays: Vevera. Absent: deProsse and Erdahl. Moved NG SECTION 17-6(d)eOFaTHE rCODE cOFdORDINANCES eOF IOWA CITY CEILING EHEIGHT ITO EXEMPT DWELLINGS WHICH WERE CONSTRUCTED PRIOR TO 1919 FROM THIS PROVISION, be considered and given second vote for passage. Motion to consider carried, 5/0. Affirmative roll call vote for second vote for passage unanimous, 5/0, deProsse and Erdahl absent. Moved by Balmer, seconded by Vevera, to adjourn the meeting, 10:00 P.M. Motion carried unanimously. 2 ROBERT A. VEVER AYO� C �e , ABBIE STOLFUS, CIJY CLERK MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES t l rl e I i 1 I I 1� I i I I i' I; I11 I' f I f r 1 1 II 1� Cc•incil Activ:ties July 3, 1979 Page 4 THE CITY OF IOWA CITY, IOWA, FOR FYBU. Resolution adopted, 4/1, with the following division of vote: Ayes: Balmer, Neuhauser, Pertet, !,'� 7 7 Roberts. Nays: Vevera. Absent: deProsse and Erdahl. Moved AMENDNG SECTION 17-6(d)eOFaTHE rCODE cOFdORDINANCESeOF IOWA CITY CEILINGEHEIGHTITO EXEMPT DWELLINGS WHICH WERE CONSTRUCTED PRIOR TO 1919 FROM THIS PROVISION, be considered and given second vote for passage. Motion to consider carried, 5/0. Affirmative roll call vote for second vote for passage unanimous, 5/0, deProsse and Erdahl absent. Moved by Balmer, seconded by Vevera, to adjourn the meeting, 10:00 _.I. P.M. Motion carried unanimously. ROBERT A. VEVERA, MAYOR s ABBIE STOLFUS, CITY CLERK t 11 t i t I MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RA rIDS•DES MCIPIES i j COUNCIL MEETING OF --_�� /c7%17 ROUTING FOR ORDINANCES, RESOLUTIONSr AGR EMENTS, CONTRACTS, NOTICES. ORIGINAL ORIGINAL XEROX XEROX COPIES COPIES COPIES CONT. INSTRUCTION AGENDA CERT. OF OF OF AFTER FOR ITEM H FILE N RECR. ITEMS CONTRACT ITEMS EXECUTION FINALIZATION a e i 3 d9o•19z eet_ —IIA 2asFle%' acCl a93 A1,'ee�pfj ✓` OLS. le. aK ✓ c/, ce-Po6Is� au l 7/7 Far 7/17 Read. � a e-i II L��rffier rope, IYI C�eI lK ✓ '/ q i7 5 %Zes.Fl,v �dlli�iice•P�bL'sL 1 P-Ld 7I7 �N 7IzG RPs.FIe ✓ raidvotce P. td: a, *1(vev:ae by PYoj tr 817p/'7 I? I� ^q wo • le IJ � yule Cou. i use Mee" A PYo le - IJ hie � u nfy j pr i /% qq // �CS• Pe iwd V eS ile d � b Cha lkpr ✓ �roj'�/ e/ovKl%0&,, Fl, ✓ R[J1/ Llxa«Wo Pam I I/ l I' Al. ll 4.0c'ef !� pYo ✓aK ICV 'r e PeS.FIP u 2 Paul %So heI L �eSPF,1good PPYS• ,p �Idakce `" 3 a 9 G 0��lJo>Y ; �1 uu t�Vtil eea ✓ e�wQi I�wd�i e i i i i 1 I MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS-DES 11010ES DATE: June 29, 1979 TO: City Council FROM: City Manager RE: Material in Friday's Packet COPY of letter to Attorney General Tom Miller from the City Manager rec the alleged discriminatory practices at Noodfields. Memorandum from the Transit Manager regarding SEATS supplemental taxi s Memoranda from the Department of Public 'Works: a. Funding for Ralston Creek Projects b. Bricks at the Service Building c. Ralston Creek Property d. Plastic Turning Arrows C. NeWsprint pickup f. Rear Loading Garbage Trucks vs. Side Loading Garbage Trucks Memorandum from the Directors of Public Works and Planning and Program Development regarding alleys located east of Gilbert Street and north o. Friendship Street. Memoranda from the Department of Planning and Program Development: a. Block 64 Hotel Development b. Boat Ramp Sites Letter of resignation from Assistant City Attorney Bob Bowlin. Copy of letter from League of Iowa Municipalities regarding the National League of Cities Annual Convention. Minutes of staff meetings of June 13 and June 2.0. The Building Linc, Volume 22, June 1979 Plaza Previews, Volume 2, i1o. 4 Article: Local governments call be run cheaper and better. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB C F.DAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES e) I0WA QTY QTY Ca)b= AGENDA REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF JULY 3, 1979 7:30 P.M. COUNCIL OWIFIERS, CIVIC OWM 410 E. WASHImnW MECROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES tlOfflES V I pnwy AGENDA REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING JULY 3, 1979 Item No. 1 - MEETING TO ORDER. AAu i,) Po 6i T V o t� &, p "'mss I d "v . ROLL CALL. IF rdeLk I I Pe v ret C7: 3S P.M) Item No. 2 - CONSIDER ADOPTION OF THE CONSENT CALENDAR AS PRESERM OR AMENDED. a., Approval of Official Actions of the regular Council meeting of June 19, 1979, subject to correction, as recomrended by the City Clerk. h. Minutes of Boards and Camdssions. (1) Riverfront Commission meeting of June 27, 1979. (2) Planning and Zoning informal meeting of June 18, 1979. (3) Human Rights Commission meeting of May 30, 1979. (4) Housing Appeals Board meeting of May 10, 1979. (5) Housing Appeals Board meeting of May 18, 1979. (6) Senior Center Commission meeting of June 20, 1979. (73 Sowa. CITY AIRPORT Cows.+. v e r,'�J) MA11.? i,19r9 C. Permit Resolutions, as recommended by City Clerk: (1) Consider resolution approving Class C Beer Sunday Sales permit application for Voss Petroleum Co., Inc. dba Discount Dan's Shell, 933 South Clinton. (2) consider resolution approving Class C Beer Sales permit application for Voss Petroleum Co., Inc. dba Discount Dan's Shell, 933 South Clinton. �qZ (3) Consider resolution approving cigarette permits. d. Setting Public Hearings. (1) Consider resolution setting ions,public h hearing of on July ct 17, 1979, on plans, spece o� %5 estimate for the Block 64 parking garage. Comment: This resolution would set the public hearing for the 400 -car parking garage on Block 64. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 1101NES m r7) 3 OAZ'L 2/90 le re MICROFILMED BY JORm MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES 110PIES I ,� .-� C7) MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES IIOINES 0 u: 0 Agenda Regular Council Meeting July 3, 1979 7:30 P.M. Page 2 e. Correspondence. (1) Consider petition for suspension of taxes for Opal Hochstetler. (2) Letter from Marilyn Turner regarding the alleged discriminatory practices of Woodfield's Disco. This LI _ lgtttteir has been referred to the City Manager for reply. �t 7.'3S- pM, CALETIDAR. Item No. 3 - PLANNIN; AND ZONING MATTERS. Action: s iD/ef'e1aTt 3�.� a. Consider a recommendation denying the Preliminary Planned Area Development Plan of "1750 Rochester." s-7505. Corment: The Planning and Zoning Commission at a regular Meting held June 7, 1979, reoommenrled (5-1) denial of the subject development plan located north of Rochester Avenue and east of Seventh Avenue. The application was denied on the basis that the development plan was. not revised to in- corporate concerns by both the staff and the commission. Attached to the Council agenda of June 19, 1979 was a letter from the applicant requesting Council consideration. Included with this agenda are all of the staff reports pre- viously submitted regarding this application. A representa- tive of the Planninq and Zoning Cmamission will be present at the y?�orma meeting to discu}gss the application. �Sc)hh�iTT.�ew Tev-�m�.,xc2..4:G i�Qa<�w.En"Y. .� h, Consider an ordinance amending sections 8.10.35.1 and 8.10.35.12A.2 cf the Code of Ordinances by adding provisions for common signage. (second consideration) Comment: The Planning and Zoning Camnission, at a regular meting held May 17, 1979, recom.erded (6-0) approval of amendments to the sign requirements for the Ml zone subject to the definition of. Front wall being changed to correspond with the definition as presented in a May 17 memorandum from Don Schmeiser, and that line 3 in the section entitled GENERAL FWIRFIMM should begin "Section B.l.a . " A mato explaining the subject amendments was attached to the Council agenda of May 29. The proposed ordinance was attached to the agenda of June 19, 1979. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOVIES Lug n cee is "to ti.u..�LLt2 e �: . 11ccao —t;, uL_�, 4,' 0.. w. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES 4q -5,o H I i is I: i fI i 1 I + I I i i. ji I j !1 I .. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES 4q -5,o H I Agenda Regular Council Meetinq July 3, 1979 7:30 P.M. Page 3 Item No. 4 - P1U,BLIC DISCUSSION. '11s � cY�r•Inu� � n�P-f'c %e C, ,-r r Ft d o-6-.1,Qee f Ue healy 'c-��}jj'r e[(,��r(� ly1ilhn f-0 4JNK norgyab'e YYn 13'rSW'J gT[iCrIC til r• r I_ -L 1 ('J t "r Item No. 5 - PUBLIC HEARIN„ ON REVISED TRANSIT SCHEDULES, ROUTINGS AND RATES. -,29ao - Comnent: A memorandum concerning these matters is enclosed with the agenda. I 4e-4te`- Zee Qame ro n.— Action: I + 11 A MSA4 s RS STr M�"t ...ate-� NOt1- .*.r lv�r er !✓o �fJ �7 PAA ,oal �s¢y,-�p1 ooTlic l �',o risers ovyou�e c� a wPc. �P`e np�y,�J.�.l-v" G • a` Item No. 6 - PUBLIC HEARING ON THE PLANS, SPECIFIC:TICNP, FOAM OF CONTRACT AND ESTIMATE MR THE TRUCK WASH FoinDIK; AT THE IOWA QTY SERVICE CENTER. Ccnment: This public hearinq is to receive input concerning construction of a 24' x 50' truck wash huildinq. This building will have warns -type wash facilities for cleaning all equipment. In ad- dition, the building will be used for engine cleaning and equip- ment cleaning prior to repair work at the adjacent service build- ing expansion now under construction. Bids will be opened July 26 and awarded July 31. j Action: PA L &L/V,- item No. 7 - CONSIDER RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, FORM OF CONTRACT AND ESTIMATE FOR THE TRUCK WASH BUILDING AND DIRECTING g GjLL PUBLICATION OF NOTICE TO BIDDERS. j —�-'—Cement: This structure is part of the renovation work at the Iowa City Service Center. This building will allow washing of all major equipment owned by the City. It is particularly important to remove salt and limit corrosion damage during the winter. Public Works would like to get this job bid promptly so it can he oom- pleted before winter and Council is asked to approve plans the same night as the hearing. Dg�/�-� 0 /�iD Action: X't - MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES FIOIIIES k 4- �D �w �o c,I.oI , 33oI/Z V 4c c_ ,/j�..� �vaq.eSr cc_),l li �lvda. l�aaewa�l. lYzc��2� dad! �wl �x�ewd— /1/%� / iy 79 3,53 7e Cf HICROFIEMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES 1 � e,U q LAPS+ 0. Ivan if—t ` n c-„ Is s'ci_ 1409 vI P UJ2 %KE pJS SE'V'UICE . cSo �e -I-{�I All ca�1 0.r -r-'. ct a vewce - MLose ,5 I'v/Ialn��i fvncAo-at,a. (J I o-� 01 e,. ,k cu+-t-.� 4v�.cc� �� � 2 a z zs� vcj• �' a ✓l N l;u c PC, Vwe. I AIJ of- d. Imo. -t- { �pn..,.-.Q._.�� Cgu-•e�.2e....a�. �i/(n.-e �...;_.._ �a Aa....�aa.. _. P� N-P.CLa�.�-Q�- • ZC W_. ALL — Cu.Le<.. z _rl n In u . na L7 a• p_,Le l QG a wvJ�' ✓L cL a ¢.. a cv�. ' &_1 Ve.J ✓L/. -74, d� _�,�— as Ikt-a o -a . 4.a-e� mac' ,i�s✓ a�- /�% ' F LGL I Larr( ��t�cu-eitr �,/ ,�,c.G>,•u � t11�G�i�.—.�,.,�. J/L��e:�aadrtiZ�¢O� , —. "" `�'O �``-�`y .C,Gin.7 (.:�wxr,✓' -i.e zi-t /c�.�sf /N• %- 0--,6iAvuzL 05:71. _._ .,,..—� MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES HOMES c�>L1�GL�-.�M^-�o �i i�L-c�_L• A�fili.2-L Gvr-'��'c.� /�-�.�%L .. V.nn.• I Ce.c�,� Cil ee�:,.�,=r.. - �er�xL�y�-44-iAG� 1V.1.._.I -A&I. ti t N N-L,U e- (-e eL-,L �t—, <-� G.0 �e V "��—i \ VL.� C�tk CEL�_a.QJ Lc )�.c.�t �.v�.�-aJ• MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS.DES IIDIFlES /a3 Ii �i �/ C�<L�L%te �vG� .r�cs�te.�st-c�e� _� �e-�u�.r•-0.2���' Ode c VL4 ins ,,; / Gu��� G`��` .mac-vLr�LG,c�c /�it��e ; :, ✓/ Lw .J%r-iGt��.co� �.:� y�,,.,e, - k,,Ll( CBicw. oe-.a 1� K. ..-F.NC0.A•V7•d-1�t.� �(..O C=/1.�4PY�k-L ..L l(//,•B:'/-,• ZfG iLG/D2L'U �Z/�G� .�L'����LL�ca• aal I )Za'/ __e_. l c — c-eee- /LCA(% )We MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR. RAPIDS—DES MOINES I E Agenda Regular Council Meetii. ' July 3, 1979 7:30 P.M. Page 4 Item No. 8 - PURLIC REARING ON PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE SOUTH GILRERT STREET IMPROVEMENT PRWECT, FAUS PFWFCT NO. UST -M -4051(1)-8U-52. Comment: See mrment next item. Action: Item No. 9 - CONSIDER RESOLUTION APPRMMn PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND AUTHORIZE 9O BIDS TO AE TAFFN FOR SOUTH GILBERT STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT. Ccrment: This resolution would authorize bids to be taken at Ames on Aug- ust 14, 1979, at 9:00 a.m. Right-of-way acquisition has been Progressing and it is expected that either contracts will be signed or oondemiation dates set in time to meet the August 14 bid date. The estimated cost is approximately $1,800,000, which includes about $500,000 for right-of-way acquisition. Action: Item No. 10 - PUDIC HFARiNG ON RESOLUTION O NGLF NDCPSSITY FOR 1979 STREET IMPRUVE- MENTS (TAEWOM STREET - VENTURA AVENIIF). rm Coent: This public hearing is necessary to bring the project hack into a schedule. All questions raised at the last public hearing have been provided anpnawer at ,this point. See next two resolutions. , �✓y/6/4 Cqo cd - C4se L1,Action: �r,L � )n.4., Gev-.mac � 12, Item No. 11 -� CONSIDER RESOLUTICN ADOPTING RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY 1979 STREET IMPROVEMENTS (TANGLEWOOD STREET - VENTURA AVENUE). Comment: After the hearin it Action: 9, >s necessary to adopt a resolution of neoes- sity Three Choices exist at this point: (1) defer until another s cific date, (2) approve resolution and schedule as is, (3) adopt an amended schedule. Unless Council desires to approve the as- sessment for the Jensen's as $9,049.62 it is necessary to adopt an amended schedule with an appropriate assessment for the Jensen's. (The one proposed was $6,370, but could be anywhere between $0 and $9,049.62.) Staff recommends adoption of either 02 or N3. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES ... ClaAol I I Ll. eeu....Q. i I ! ` ... (J✓ � Hitt -lis. � .fir• -at,'/ (v�C / (J-'GGLl4/ !LC CI�GlC r. i { _ _,(dam. ���, �'�� � �. �i,��� -�y �.u,�tit u.� • I I i � �J,�-�/jr-2litLe-t` •5� �/ J/1¢J-6M.-fir.. i i I RICROFILRED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAP IDS•DES NOIIIES .I i ( Re C�L. _ V a-CC.eQ_dJ , u ..'tvG i B -S --el. e: ;moi VL,- -� GO...N,_,j �C-0-Lj -l.; P-�� CQ ffc i. 0O Q Ccu �a Q tip — C �� a ZC�11 l e ,&. i Y+c.o.� �,�..�_ by .�'"-%"`�.�, ✓G.t�fl/ .� %ZCa. �r� _ .c��r.� • 17 i MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB I CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES Agenda' Regular Council Meeting July 3, 1979 7:30 P.M. Page 5 Item No. 12 - CONSIDER RFSOLDTION DIRECTING ENGINEER TO PREPARE DETAILED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND DIRECTING ATTORNEY 70 PREPARE FORM OF CON- TRACT AND NOTICE TO AIDDFRS ON THE 1979 STREET IMPM? Ms (TANGLEWOOD STREET - VEMURA AVENUE). Comment: This will he the last item for a period of time until legal staff can finish a quiet title action for the project. Assuming an amerYded resolution is adopted, this will allow staff to finalize the entire package prior to bid procedures being set. Action: Item No. 13 - REOCMO;PII)ATIONS TO TvE CITY COUNCIL. a. Consider neoolmLeniation of the Riverfront CamLission: Considering that the Sturgis Corner site seers to be unfeas- ible for a boat raE:p, the Riverfront Commission reoo mends that the City employ Stanley Consultants to study the Sturgis Ferry sites (north and south) and make a recommendation re- garding feasibility of a ramp at either site. If the con- sultants find neither site at Sturgis Ferry Park suitable, they should make an investigation of Napoleon Park for the same purpose. The Riverfront Camnission strongly reoo mmends the City Council take steps to develop the Sturgis Corner riverfront area for recreational purposes particularly for access for shoreline fishermen and parking facilities. The question of the ownership of Sturgis Ferry Park has not �tzx c been lVed. Qw �'t � Q�y Lin^ 2C► 3� A Cwf) y • /�Q c �e— eso b. Consider recommendation of the Senior Center Comnission that the City Manager proceed with receiving approval of the City Council for the preliminary design plans for the Senior Cen- ter with the provision that the architects provide an estimate of the additional cost for the mezzanine to be extended across the middle of the first floor. 11n,1 keV- eCl4Z.,F aur^. _•.,P�2..�,. �1QQ . Item No. 14 - ANNOUNCEMENT OF VACANCIES. a. Committee on Comrtuiity Needs — One vacancy for an unexpired term ending March 1, 1990 (Irl Carter resigned). b. Ffousinq Cwnission — One vacancy for an unexpired term ending May 1, 1990 (Cora Pollock resigned.) These appointments will be made at the August 14, 1979, meeting of the City Council. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES 79y 1 { Agenda / Regular Council Meetinq July 3, 1979 7:30 P.M. Page 6 Item No. 15 - CI^TrY COUNCIL INFORMATION. Item No. 16 - RFPORT ON ITEMS FROM THE CITY MANAGER AND CITY ATmRNEY. a. City Manager. b. City Attorney. Item No. 17 - CONSIDER RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO SIGN AN AGRWSW AMENDMENT FOR THF. FLOCK 64 DESIGN CONPRACf INCREASING TRE 029 6 FROM $81,000 To $89,000. FEE Conment: See attached mEm. Action: MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 1101HES Agenda Regular Council Meeting July 3, 1979 7:30 P.M. Page 7 Item No. 19 - CONSIDER RESOLUTION FSTARLISHING POSITION HY PAY PLAN FOR CLAS - I47 SIFTED PERSON M OF THE CITY OF IGM CITY, IOWH, FOR W80. Comment: This resolution approves the pay plan which was given to the Council on Tuesday, June 26. A memoranrtam from the Human Rela- tions Director was also distributed at that time. Action: Item No. 19 - CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE AMENDIM =ION 17-6(d) OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF IOWA CITY CEILIM HEIGHT TO E70:Mn MILLI%S WHICH WERE CDNSTRUCPED PRIOR TO 1919 FROM THIS PROVISION. (second con- sideration) Comment: This amendment would exempt dwellings which were constructed prior to 1919 from the provisions on ceiling heights in the Minimum Housing Code. This would offer some relief to owners of historic buildings who are unable to cane into compliance with the present provisions. Action: wR Item No. 20 - ADJa1RNMENT. 49-4 MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MO RIES r INFORMAL COUNCIL DISCUSSION JUNE 18, 1919 INFORMAL COUNCIL DISCUSSION: June 18, 1979, 1:30 P.M., in the Conference Room at the Civic Center. Mayor Pro tem Balmer presiding. COUNCILMEMBERS PRESENT: Balmer, Perret, deProsse, Neuhauser. Absent: Roberts, Erdahl (1:40 PM), Vevera (3:00 PM) STAFFMEMBERS PRESENT: Berlin, Stolfus, Helling. Others present for certain discussions, as noted. TAPE-RECORDED on Reel 79-18, Side 2, 30 to End, and Reel 79-19, Side 1, 1-134, APPLICATIONS TO PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Schmeiser, Boothroy 38-600 "1750 Rochester" 1. Boothroy explained denial by P&Z. In the Windsor Hts. V subdivision, P&Z said Windsor Court should be extended to Seventh Ave. as an access, now Glasgow wants to extend this street thru the storm -water detention basin, will give the r -o -w thru to the City, but will not construct the street. 2. Schnittjer was present for Glasgow & he explained that the street alignment in Windsor Hts. V. was not good, too steep. Councilman Erdahl present, 1:40 PM. 3, As the developable lots belong to Schneider, Glasgow says Schneider should provide the storm -water detention. 4. Traffic patterns were discussed. 5. Schnittjer commented on Glasgow's plans to get building permits, access to Rochester. Berlin stated that he would prefer that Glasgow develop the P.A.D. P&Z wanted Windsor Ct. to be extended. 6. A compilation of all staffreports will be sent to Council, and a meeting scheduled with P&Z for Monday, with Glasgow present if he wishes to be. Hy -Vee Store N1, Sou!' of��By asks 6 1. This is bothanLSNRDand i subdivision (Boyrum Subd.). 2, One-half of the r -o -w will be quit -claimed to the City by Miller, the other half by Boyd. The plan meets the requirements of the new tree regulations, 3. The same language, "existing unauthorized access", not approved by RR or City, should be written on final plat. Council discussed the unprotected rail crossing, which Steve Victor advised was on a private street, on private land. The legal department will determine if there is any City liability. 4. A report from the Traffic Engineer was requested regarding the railroad crossing, the accesses and traffic patterns in the area. 5. The final plat for Boyrum St. Subd, does not show medians that were on the preliminary. DOT wanted a free-flow type of access. The Traffic Engr. agreed with the final plat. Traffic flow was explained, P&Z approved as shown on final, (no median). Schmeiser commented that it would be a problem, when there is heavy traffic on Boyrum. i;. - MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -0[S 11011iCS ..- Page 2 TREE REGULATIONS_ dehrosse absent from the room, 2:20 PM. Boothroy stated that the memo from the packet of 6/15 outlined changes made, but there are other subtle and minor changes. It was noted that it was more beneficial to have large! trees. This ordinance will be enforceable. Other discussion will !le held at the public hearing. SIGN ORDINANCE The amendment will benefit Norm Bailey, as well as others, to have one common sign on Gilbert St., for the six stores on Quincy St. deProsse returned, 2:35 PM. This ordinance is applicable only to five or more businesses. RIDGE ROAD DRAINAGE Dietz present. I. Mr. & Mrs. Hendershot were present. 2. Dietz outlined the problem on a map on the blackboard. Mayor Vevera arrived, 2:40 PM. 3. Erosion between the Lambert & Cutler properties, dumps into the Ball (Hendershot) property. 4. Dietz explained remedies, and problems in implementation. 5. There is a 7' strip of land, originally used for a walkway, city inlets concentrate a flow of water onto this area. There are no deed restrictions on the 7' or no city access for drainage. 6. The Ball triangle can be developed. 7. Dietz advised Council that what they decided would have an impact on other similar locations and problems. Lambert will not give access for filling from the top. 8. Council asked for information on the magnitude of the'costs, and list of other areas of the City where there are problems, also the responsibility of the City. Staff will discuss alternatives at a later date. Balmer asked if a consultant could be retained. 9. Dietz explained the situations at the end of Virginia Drive and at Ridgewood Lane. City crews have dumped rip -rap at the end of Virginia Drive, which has stabilized the erosion. At Ridge- wood there is a hole in the storm sewer, which is now surrounded by a snowfence. There is no easement for sewer pipe. This could be an in-house project. ARCHITECTURAL BARRIER REMOVAL PROGRAM Kraft, Keller, present. I. KeTTe—r—ca-TTeT attention to the memo in the 6/15 packet. 200 curb cuts from $50,000. This construction package will be tied in with the Neighborhood Site Improvement Program, possibly will be bid in one month. Keller explained the rationale for the locations of cuts. 2. There were programs in three areas, the Civic Center, the Rec Center and City Park, a status report was given for each area. The Plaza will be accessible. SPOUSE ABUSE Kraft present. K1— raft called attention to the memo presented in the 6/15 packet. The Sept. 4 date should be changed to Sept. 11th. Berlin commented that the schedule as presented, was realistic. 2. Diane Dornburg stated that the shelter could be opened 3/1/80, depending on time for rehab. 3. Berlin explained why the City could not option property. Any intention to circumvent regulations of HUD would be risky. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEM RAPIDS -DES MOINES Informal Council June 18, 1979 600-750 750-1190 1190-1535 1535-1750 Page 3. 4. Several houses could be looked at, in the '403' area. 5. United Way will be exploring a way of finding funding for the program, the City giving them this start. AGENDA - COUNCIL TIME Councilmembers do not wish to receive Board & Commission agendas in the packet. Also both sides of paper should be used if possible, on other items. 2. deProsse called attention to the letter from Old Brick as distributed, asking for donation of bricks for bordering sidewalk on Clinton St. (in public right-of-way). Berlin advised that they �:ould have to get approval of Public Works re construction procedure. 3. deProsse noted that bicyclists are using the old bike -way on First Ave. Berlin stated that Staff is meeting with the School District on Tues. and will discuss this problem, along with the crossing guard issue. 4. deProsse advised that she would not be attending the June 25th & 26th meetings. 5. After a short discussion, Councilmembers agreed to go ahead and charge for motorcycle parking, as recommended by Brachtel in his memo on the agenda. 6. Berlin clarified the procedure used in support for the Nelson Adult Center, noting that it was HUD regulation. 7. Berlin stated that only the Washington/Capitol segment of the Streetscape Project is being done at this time. Clinton will be another segment. 8. deProsse questioned if the Boat Ramp, as explained in the recommendation from Riverfront Comm., met the requirements for funding for low, moderate income. Berlin explained that the rest of the program, overall, should meet the 75% require- ment, but he would check to make sure. As the City does not own the property, dedication of the 80' from Braverman, was discussed. 9. Berlin explained that handbill advertising was not allowed. Stolfus noted that in one Sec. of the Code, a permit is required, in another section, distribution is not allowed. 10. Helling outlined the present plans for the Muscular Dystrophy parade on Nov. 4th. Starting at 9 AM on Sun. morning would eliminate cross -traffic problems on the Bypass. He noted that a lot more work on safety matters had been done this year. They will make an application later. 11. Regarding the letter from Robert Crow, the Traffic Engineer will investigate and do a card survey. Helling advised that Plastino wanted to discuss the problem on Broadway. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES t101n Es Informal Council June 18, 1979 1750-2710 ..1 r-. Page 4 Informal Council June 18, 1979 12. City Clerk made corrections to the agenda as follows: Items 2.c (6), (7), & (8), are Beer licenses not Liquor; Items 2.c (9) & (10) should be deleted, at request of applicant; Item 19, should be improvements in Braverman Center Addn. not Southgate; and a proclamation for Sun Day will be added. The Mayor added another proclamation, Area Home Builders' Week. 13. Berlin called attention to a problem concerning a public housing site on F St., brought to his attention by John Gillespie. Gillespie was advised to write a letter to Council. 14. Mayor Vevera asked if any other Councilmembers had had problems with persons given citations by the Animal Shelter re dogs & leashing. Berlin noted two complaints had been received. Council discussed Councilmembers suggested giving a warning the first time there m the Code, attitude of City employees, dogs under 'control'. Some is a violation. Berlin noted that there are not as many complaints now as in previous years. Horton will provide a report on both circumstances, as well as on problems they are having, and progress of a new ordinance. APPOINTMENT TO THE HOUSING COMMISSION 1. City Clerk advised that Lorna Mathes had withdrawn her application. 2. Councilmembers agreed to appoint Rachel Dennis. COMPENSATION -CITY MANAGER & CITY CLERK 1. Vevera commented that there was not a big enough sprea9-18 d between 2710 -End department head salaries and the City Mgr.'s salary. Berlin Side 1, Reel 7, outlined survey of Big 10 -Big 8 cities taken b City Mgr. salaries. Councilmembers agreed that they were pleased ersonnel for 1 134 with the job Berlin is doing, bringing the City together, and for the five years, he has not had a merit raise. Replacement cost to be competitive,'was discussed. Council agreed to set the salary at the third quartile for the northwest geographic region, in personnel survey, at $38,985. 2. Council agreed on $20,000 for the City Clerk salary. Meeting adjourned, 5:05 PM. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOIIIES COMPLETE DESCRIPTION OF COUNCIL ACTIVITIES JUNE 19, 1979 Iowa City Council, reg. mtg., 6/19/79, 7:30 P.M. at the Civic Center. Mayor Vevera presiding. Councilmembers present: Balmer, deProsse, Neuhauser, Ferret (7:35 PM), Roberts, Vevera. Absent: Erdahl. Staffinembers present: Hayek, Berlin, Stolfus, Helling, Glaves, Schmeiser. Council minutes tape-recorded on Tape 79-17, Side 1, 1241 -End. Mayor Vevera proclaimed Saturday, June 23rd as Sun Day, and the week of June 22-29 as Area Home Builders Assn. Week, Iowa City area. Moved by Balmer, seconded by Neuhauser, that the following items and recommendations in the Consent Calendar be received, or approved, and/or adopted, as amended at the informal meeting: Approval of Official Actions, reg. Council mtg., 6/5/79, subject to correction, as recommended by City Clerk. Minutes of Boards & Commissions: Planning & Zoning Comm. -6/4 & 6/7/79; Riverfront Comm. -5/30/79; Resources Conserv. Comm. -5/8 & 6/12/79; Senior Center Comm. -6/6/79. Permit Resolutions, Book 57, as recommended by City Clerk: RES. 79-258, p, 834, APPROVING CLASS C LIQUOR LICENSE FOR D. ALBERHASKY dba/DAVE'S FOXHEAD TAVERN, 402 E. Market. RES. 79-259, p. 835, APPROVING CLASS C LIQUOR LICENSE and RES. 79-260, p. 836, SUNDAY SALES. FOR K. DEMPSTER dba/THE MILL RESTAURANT, 120 E. Burlington. RES. 79-261, p. 837, APPROVING CLASS C LIQUOR LICENSE FOR L. & J. McNERTNEY dba/SYCAMORE EATING AND DRINKING CO., INC., MALL SHOPPING CENTER. RES. 79-262, p. 838, APPROVING CLASS C LIQUOR LICENSE FOR CHOPEK POST M17, AMERICAN LEGION, 3016 American Legion Road. RES. 79-263, p. 839, APPROVING CLASS C BEER PERMIT and RES. 79-264, p. 840, SUNDAY SALES FOR WALGREEN, 1646 Sycamore. RES. 79-265, p. 841, APPROVING CLASS C BEER PERMIT FOR MCRO, INC. dba/WHITEWAY SUPERMARKET, 212 S. Clinton. RES. 79-266, APPROVING CIGARETTE PERMITS, pp, 842-843. RES. Setting Public Hearings: RES. 79-267, Bk. 57, p. 844, SETTING PUBLIC HEARING ON 7/17/79 ON PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR SOUTH GILBERT STREET PROJECT. RES. 79-268, Bk. 57, p. 845, SETTING PUBLIC HEARING ON PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, FORM OF CONTRACT AND ESTIMATE FOR TRUCK WASH BUILDING AT SERVICE CENTER, FOR 7/3/79, at Civic Center, bids opened 7/26, and awarded 7/31. Correspondence referred to City Mgr. for reply: R. Reddig, concerning distribution of handbills. Petition from R. Crow & eight residents of 1600 Block of Broadway requesting re-evaluation of 'no parking' signs on west side of Broadway. Memo from Traffic Engr. re addition of motorcycle parking at Burlington St. Parking Lot. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES !10111[5 Council Activities June 19, 1979 Page 2 Application from J. & T. Shymansky to hold annual block party on McLean St. , June 23, approved. Affirmative roll call vote unanimous, 5/0, Erdahl & Perret absent. Mayor Vevera announced the public hearings as set. Recommendations from Planning & Zoning Comm.: 1) denying prel. planned area development plan of '1750 Rochester' and 2) approving final large scale non-residential development plan and final plat of Hy -Vee Food Stores, south of Hwy. 6 Bypass, Moved by Balmer, seconded by Roberts, to set public hearing on the revised Tree Regulations, on July 17, 1979, as recommended by P&Z. Motion carried unanimously, 5/0. Staff memo also, noted. Public hearing was held on an ordinance amending Sections 8.10.35.1 and 8.10.35.12A of the Sign Ordinance. No one appeared. John Suchomel appeared for clarification on issuance of bonds for the Dey Bldg. construction of the hotel, and commented on flag request compliance. Councilman Perret arrived, 7:35 P.M. Public hearing was held on whether a beer permit issued to Donald Stucker, dba/First Avenue Kerr-McGee, should be revoked or suspended for violation of liquor regulations. City Atty. Hayek indicated that Officer Keating was present to give evidence if the Council wished, however he was asking for a deferral for one week to verify if the conviction was obtained, If it is, there is a mandatory 14 day suspension. Moved by deProsse, seconded by Perret, .to defer the public hearing for one week. Donald Stucker stated that he had entered a guilty plea at court. Hayek stated that Council could act now on the matter, and deProsse and Perret withdrew their motion. Moved by deProsse, seconded by Perret, to suspend the license for two weeks, starting July 9th. Motion carried, 6/0, Erdahl absent. Public hearing was held on the plans, specifications, form of contract for Streetscape Improvement Project II -A, paving & sewer on Capitol between Burlington and Washington, and Washington between Madison & Clinton. Development Coordinator Glaves relayed the request of the University to hold the paving alignment of a portion of Washington St. from Capitol to Madison to the North edge. He asked that Council adopt the plans, and the change could be made by addendum or field change later, so that the bidding process would not be delayed, Glaves gave an explanation of the request and noted that it would not adversely affect Iowa City. Roberts reiterated his concern over the narrowness of Washington, and re turning radius for trucks. He also questioned the replacement of two storm sewers with one, which was answered by Glaves. John Suchomel advised Council of two plugged sewer drains, one by the Engineering Building and the other at the Iowa Ave, parking lot. Moved by deProsse, seconded by Perret to adopt RES. 79-269, Bk. 57, pp. 846-847, APPROVING PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND AUTHORIZING BIDDING PROCEDURES FOR STREETSCAPE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT II -A, bids to be received on 7/12. Affirmative roll call vote unanimous, 6/0, Erdahl absent. MICROFILM EO BY JORM MICROLAB cennR RA HDs-DU '101 NES Council Activities June 19, 1979 Page 3 The recommendation of the Riverfront Commission regarding allocation of $75,000 CDBG funds was discussed. Berlin explained that Stanley Consultants reported that a boat ramp at Sturgis Corners was not feasible. Vevera was upset that Iowa City does not make use of its river. Commis- sioner Gilpin advised that they would be considering the report and alternative locations at their next meeting. The report will also be sent to Councilmembers. Moved by Perret, seconded by deProsse, to appoint Rachel Dennis, 1110 N. Dubuque, to the Housing Commission for an unexpired term ending May 1, 1982. Motion carried unanimously. Moved by deProsse, seconded by Neuhauser, to adopt RES. 79-270, Bk. 57, p. 848, ON UNCLASSIFIED SALARIES for FY80. Balmer suggested that a 10% raise would be fair for the City Manager's salary, and stated that salaries should be discussed without the individuals present. Other Councilmembers explained why they were in favor of the proposed raise. Jim Lyons, 808 S. Dubuque, questioned how Council was exempting this move from President Carter's guidelines. Perret explained that the 7% can be the average of the whole group, or City unit. Affirmative roll call vote unanimous, 6/0, Erdahl absent. City Manager Berlin reported that he understood that regarding the Nagle hotel, that Nagle does not want to proceed with conventional financing. Staff will schedule a discussion for July 2nd, and at that time a draft of the new bidding documents, memo on alternative financing and a recommendation will be presented, to get the bids out early in July. The City legally has to rebid the project, to be able to use the Revenue Bond financing. The City Manager requested that any calls concerning cable television franchise should be referred to Atty. Hayek or Asst. Atty. Ryan. He also called attention to the parking ramp, Block 83/84, report as distributed, from Carl Walker & Associates. Asst. City Mgr. Helling stated that Senator Small had called a meeting on Thursday at 3 PM with Mr. Stanek of the Iowa Energy Policy Council, which would be at the Civic Center and open to the public. Moved by Balmer, seconded by deProsse, to approve the Revised Fiscal Policy as presented by the Finance Director. Motion carried unanimously. Moved by deProsse, seconded by Perret to approve the Curb Cut Program Portion of the Architectural Barrier Removal Program, as proposed by Planning and Program Dept. Motion carried unanimously. Status report on other elements of the program was distributed with agenda. Previously this CDBG-funded program had been approved by Resolution, this approval is for curb -cut sites. Moved by Neuhauser, seconded by Balmer to adopt RES. 79-271, Bk. 57, pp. 849-858, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO SIGN A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF IOWA CITY AND THE JOHNSON COUNTY ASSOCIATION FOR RETARDED CITIZENS FOR THE MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB r.rnnR RAPIDS -Drs -minrs Council Activities June 19, 1979 Page 4 USE OF $50,000 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDS FOR DAY CARE SERVICES (NELSON ADULT CENTER) TO ADULTS CONSTRAINED BY DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES (PRIMARILY MENTAL RETARDATION). Affirmative roll call vote unanimous, 6/0, Erdahl absent. City Manager Berlin announced his resignation as an officer of the organization. Moved by Neuhauser, seconded by deProsse, to adopt RES. 79-272, Bk. 57, pp. 859-861, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO SIGN AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF IOWA CITY AND THE IOWA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, transferring the ownership of lighting systems at the intersection of I-80 & Primary Road N1 to D.O.T. Affirmative roll call vote unanimous, 6/0, Erdahl absent. City Mgr. Berlin requested that the following resolution and ordinance in Item 21, be implemented before July. Because the adoption of these items was inevitable, Vevera & Roberts noted that they would vote for them to facilitate implementation by the Finance Dept., although actually they were against the items. Moved by Neuhauser, seconded by deProsse,- to adopt RES. 79-273, Bk. 57, p. 862,SETTING FEES FOR COLLECTION AND DISPOSAL OF SOLID WASTE. Resolution adopted upon the following division of vote: Ayes: Vevera, deProsse, Neuhauser, Perret, Roberts. Nays: Balmer. Absent: Erdahl. Moved by deProsse, seconded by Neuhauser, to adopt RES. 79-274, Bk. 57, pp. 863-866, APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH THE CEDAR RAPIDS AND IOWA CITY RAILWAY COMPANY, necessary for - the Corridor Sewers Project, for construction within CRANDIC right-of-way. Affirmative roll call vote " unanimous, 6/0, Erdahl absent. Moved by Perret, seconded by Neuhauser, to adopt RES. 79-275, Bk. 57, p. 867, ON INDUSTRIAL COST RECOVERY, a condition of Corridor Sewer grant. Affirmative roll call vote unanimous, 6/0, Erdahl absent. Moved by Neuhauser, seconded by deProsse, to adopt RES. 79-276, Bk. 57, p. 868, ACCEPTING SANITARY AND STORM SEWER AND PAVING IMPROVEMENTS IN BRAVERMAN CENTER ADDITION, specifically all of Block 7, and Lots 1, 2, & 3 of Block 5. Affirmative roll call vote unanimous, 6/0, Erdahl absent. Moved by Neuhauser, seconded by deProsse, to adopt RES. 79-277, Bk. 57,' p. '869; AWARDING PART C OF THE BDI SECOND' ADDITION SPECIAL ASSESSMENT TO PARKVIEW COMPANY FOR $199,265.00, as changed and recommended by Public Works. Affirmative roll call vote unanimous, 6/0, Erdahl absent. Council discussed the mandatory collection portion of the ordinance, as there can be no private collection. Atty. Hayek advised passage of the ordinance at this time, but he will review the provision for mandatory collection. Moved by Balmer, seconded by Neuhauser, that the rule requiring that ordinances must be considered and voted on for passage at two Council meetings prior to the meeting at which it is to be finally passed be suspended, that the first and second consideration and vote be waived, and that ORD. 79-2958, Bk. 15, pp. 79-83, AMENDING AN ORDINANCE MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB UDAR RAPIB- Dff rioiRE.s Council Activities June 19, 1979 Page 5 AMENDING CHAPTER 15 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF IOWA CITY (SOLID WASTE ORD.), be voted upon for final passage at this time. Affirmative roll call vote unanimous, 6/0, Erdahl absent. Staff was requested to check into complaint received from Byron Ross. Moved by Balmer, seconded by deProsse, that ORD. 79-2959, Bk. 15, pp. 84-86, AMENDING CHAPTER 5, ARTICLE I, OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF IOWA CITY BY ADDING REGULATIONS FOR DANCES IN ESTABLISHMENTS WHICH HOLD BEER OR LIQUOR LICENSES, be passed and adopted. Affirmative roll call vote unanimous, 6/0, Erdahl absent. Moved by Balmer, seconded by Vevera, to adjourn the meeting, 8:55 P.M. Motion carried unanimously. ROBERT A. VEVERA, MAYOR MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAP IDS•DES n0111ES MINUTES OF OFFICIAL ACTIONS OF COUNCIL - 6/19/79 The cost of publishing the following pro- ceedings & claims is $ Cumulative cost for this calendar year for said publication is $ Iowa City Council, reg. mtg., 6/19/79, 7:30 P.M. at the Civic Center. Mayor Vevera presiding. Councilmembers present: Balmer, deProsse, Neuhauser, Perret (7:35 PM), Roberts, Vevera. Absent: Erdahl. Mayor Vevera proclaimed Saturday, June 23rd as Sun Day, and the week of June 22-29 as Area Home Builders Assn. Week, Iowa City area. Moved by Balmer, seconded by Neuhauser, that the following items and recommendations in the Consent Calendar be received, or approved, and/or adopted, as amended at the informal meeting: Approval of Official Actions, reg. Council mtg., 6/5/79, subject to correction, as recommended by City Clerk. Minutes of Boards & Commissions: Planning & Zoning Comm. -6/4 & 6/7/79; Riverfront Comm. -5/30/79; Resources Conserv. Comm. -5/8 & '6/12/79; Senior Center Comm. - 6/6/79. Permit Resolutions, Book 57, as recommended by City Clerk:: RES. 79-258, p. 834, APPROVING CLASS C LIQUOR LICENSE FOR D. ALBERHASKY dba/DAVE'S FOXHEAD TAVERN, 402 E. Market. RES. 79-259, p. 835, APPROVING CLASS C LIQUOR LICENSE and RES. 79-260, p. 836, SUNDAY SALES FOR K. DEMPSTER dba/THE MILL RESTAURANT, 120 E. Burlington. RES. 79-261, p. 837, APPROVING CLASS C LIQUOR LICENSE FOR L. & J. McNERTNEY dba/SYCAMORE EATING AND DRINKING CO., INC., MALL SHOPPING CENTER. RES. 79-262, p. 838, APPROVING CLASS C LIQUOR LICENSE FOR CHOPEK POST M17, AMERICAN LEGION, 3016 American Legion Road. RES. 79-263, p. 839, APPROVING CLASS C BEER PERMIT and RES. 79-264, p. 840, SUNDAY SALES FOR WALGREEN, 1646 Sycamore. RES. 79-265, p. 841, APPROVING CLASS C BEER PERMIT FOR MCRO, INC. dba/WHITEWAY SUPERMARKET, 212 S. Clinton. RES. 79-266, APPROVING CIGARETTE PERMITS, pp. 842-843." RES. Setting Public Hearings: RES. 79- 267, Bk. 57, p. 844, SETTING PUBLIC HEARING ON 7/17/79 ON PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR SOUTH GILBERT STREET PROJECT. RES. 79-268, Bk. 57, p. 845, SETTING PUBLIC NEARING ON PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, FORM OF CONTRACT AND ESTIMATE MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES '10111Es Official Actions FOR TRUCK WASH BUILDING AT SERVICE CENTER, FOR June 19, 1979 7/3/79, at Civic Center, bids opened 7/26, and Page 2 awarded 7/31, Correspondence referred to City Mgr. for reply: R. Reddig, concerning distribution of handbills. Petition from R. Crow & eight residents of 1600 Block of Broadway requesting re-evaluation of 'no parking' signs on west side of Broadway. Memo from Traffic Engr, re addition of motorcycle parking at Burlington St. Parking Lot. Application from J. & T. Shymansky to hold annual block party on McLean St., June 23, approved. Affirmative roll call vote unanimous, 5/0, Erdahl & Perret absent. Recommendations from Planning & Zoning Comm.: 1) denying prel, planned area development plan of 1750 Rochester. and 2) approving final large scale non-residential development plan and final plat of Hy -Vee Food Stores,south of. Hwy, 6 Bypass. Moved by Balmer, seconded by Roberts, to set public hearing on the revised Tree Regulations, on July 17, 1979, as recommended by P&Z. Motion carried unanimously, 5/0. Staff memo also, noted. Public hearing was held on an ordinance amending Sections 8.10,35,1 and 8.10,35.12A of the Sign Ordinance. No one appeared. John Suchomel appeared for clarification on issuance of bonds for the Dey Bldg, construction of the hotel, and commented on flag request compliance. Councilman Perret arrived, 7:35 P.M. Public hearing was held on .whether a beer Permit issued to Donald Stucker, dba/First Avenue Kerr-McGee, should be revoked or suspended for violation of liquor regulations. Moved by deProsse, seconded by Perret; to defer the public hearing for one week. Donald Stucker stated that he had entered a guilty plea at court. Hayek stated that Council could act now on the matter, and deProsse and Perret withdrew their motion. Moved by deProsse, seconded by Perret, to suspend the license for two weeks, starting July 9th. Motion carried, 6/0, Erdahl absent, Public hearing was held on the plans, specifi- cations, form of contract for Streetscape Improvement Project II -A, paving & sewer on Capitol between Burlington and Washington, and Washington between Madison & Clinton. Development Coordinator Glaves relayed the request of the University to hold the paving alignment of a portion of MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR IAPIDS-DES 10IIIES Official Actions Washington St. from Capitol to Madison to the North June 19, 1979 edge. He asked that Council adopt the plans, and Page 3 the change could be made by addendum or field change later, so that the bidding process would not be delayed. John Suchomel advised Council of two plugged sewer drains, one by the Engineering Building and the other at the Iowa Ave. parking lot. Moved by deProsse, seconded by Ferret to adopt RES. 79-269, Bk. 57, pp. 846-847, APPROVING PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND AUTHORIZING BIDDING PROCEDURES FOR STREETSCAPE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT II- A, bids to be received on 7/12. Affirmative roll call vote unanimous, 6/0, Erdahl absent. The recommendation of the Riverfront Commission regarding allocation of $75,000 CDBG funds was discussed. Commissioner Gilpin advised that they would be considering the report and alternative locations at their next meeting. Moved by Perret, seconded by deProsse, to appoint Rachel Dennis, to the Housing Commission for an unexpired term ending May 1, 1982. Motion carried unanimously. Moved by deProsse, seconded by Neuhauser, to adopt RES. 79-270, Bk. 57, p. 848, ON UNCLASSIFIED SALARIES for FY80. Jim Lyons questioned how Council was exempting this move from President Carter's guidelines. Perret explained that the 7% can be the average of the whole group, or City unit. Affirmative roll call vote unanimous, 6/0, Erdahl absent. City Manager Berlin reported that regarding the Nagle hotel. Staff will schedule a discussion for July 2nd. Moved by Balmer, seconded by deProsse, to approve the Revised Fiscal Policy as presented by the Finance Director. Motion carried unanimously. Moved by deProsse, seconded by Perret to approve the Curb Cut Program Portion of the Archi- tectural Barrier Removal Program. Motion carried unanimously. Moved by Neuhauser, seconded by Balmer to adopt RES. 79-271, Bk. 57, pp. 849-858, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO SIGN A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF IOWA CITY AND THE JOHNSON.. COUNTY ASSOCIATION FOR RETARDED CITIZENS FOR THE USE OF $50,000 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDS FOR DAY CARE SERVICES (NELSON ADULT CENTER) TO ADULTS CONSTRAINED BY DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES (PRIMARILY MENTAL RETARDATION). Affirmative roll call vote unanimous, 6/0, Erdahl absent. City Manager Berlin announced his resignation as an officer of the organization. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES !.IOIMEs official Actions June 29, 1979 Page 4 Moved by Neuhauser, seconded by deProsse, to adopt RES. 79-272, Bk. 57, pp. 859-861, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO SIGN AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF IOWA CITY AND THE IOWA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, transferring the ownership of lighting systems at the intersection of I-80 & Primary Road M1 to D.O.T. Affirmative roll call vote unanimous, 6/0, Erdahl absent. Moved by Neuhauser, seconded by deProsse, to adopt RES. 79-273, Bk. 57, p. 862, SETTING FEES FOR COLLECTION AND DISPOSAL OF SOLID WASTE. Resolution adopted upon the following division of vote: Ayes: Vevera, deProsse, Neuhauser, Perret, Roberts. Nays: Balmer. Absent: Erdahl. Moved by deProsse, seconded by Neuhauser, to adopt RES. 79-274, Bk. 57, pp. 863-866, APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH THE CEDAR RAPIDS AND IOWA CITY RAILWAY COMPANY, necessary for the Corridor Sewers Project, for construction within CRANDIC right-of- way. Affirmative roll call vote unanimous, 6/0, Erdahl absent. Moved by Perret, seconded by Neuhauser, to adopt. RES. 79-275, Bk. 57, p. 867, ON INDUSTRIAL COST, RECOVERY, a condition of Corridor Sewer grant. Affirmative roll call vote unanimous, 6/0, Erdahl absent. .Moved by Neuhauser, seconded by deProsse, to adopt. RES. 79-276, Bk. 57,, p. 868, ACCEPTING SANITARY AND STORM SEWER AND PAVING IMPROVEMENTS IN BRAVERMAN CENTER ADDITION, specifically all of Block 7, and Lots 1, 2, & 3 of Block 5. Affirmative roll call vote unanimous, 6/O, Erdahl absent. Moved by Neuhauser, seconded by deProsse, to adopt RES. 79-277, Bk. 57, p. 869, AWARDING PART C OF, THE BDI SECOND ADDITION SPECIAL ASSESSMENT TO PARKVIEW COMPANY FOR 3199,265.00. Affirmative roll call vote unanimous, 6/0, Erdahl absent. Atty. Hayek advised passage of the ordinance at this time, but he will review the provision for mandatory collection. Moved by. Balmer, seconded by Neuhauser, that the rule requiring that ordinances must be considered and voted on for passage at two Council meetings prior to the meeting at which it is to be finally passed be suspended, that the first and second consideration and vote be waived, and that ORD. 79-2958, Bk. 15, pp. 79-83, AMENDING AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 15 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF IOWA CITY (SOLID WASTE ORD,), be voted upon for final passage at this time. Affirmative roll call vote unanimous, 6/0, Erdahl absent. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES moiMEs Official Actions June 19, 1979 Page 5 Moved by Balmer, seconded by deProsse, that ORD. 79-2959, Bk. 15, pp. 84-86, AMENDING CHAPTER 5, ARTICLE I, OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF IOWA CITY BY ADDING REGULATIONS FOR DANCES IN ESTABLISHMENTS WHICH HOLD BEER OR LIQUOR LICENSES, be passed and adopted. Affirmative roll call vote unanimous, 6/0, Erdahl absent. Moved by Balmer, seconded by Vevera, to adjourn the meeting, 8:55 P.M. Motion carried unanimously. A more complete description of Council activities is on file in the office of the City Clerk. _ s/ROBERT A. VFVFRG Mevnn RE9ulaa. CouNcit MEEtil Y:30 ?.M. 'p4EasE Siv IN: NamE: lAaalgass: a] .A0 -/D 6WRI466 /ILL 5" MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 110111ES ti MINUTES IOWA CITY RIVBRFRONT COMMISSION JIVE 27, 1979 -- 7:30 P.M. CITY MANAGER'S CONFERENCE ROOM MEMBERS PRf:5ENT: Gilpin, Fountain, Fahr, Ncuzil, Sokol, Knight, Berry, Boutelle MEMBERS ABSENT: Vetter, Baker, Kroeze STAFF PRESENT: Milkman, Deevers, liencin, Campbell, Tegler GUESTS: Nancy Ross, KXIC RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL: Considering that the Sturgis Corner site seems to be unfeasible for a boat ramp, the Riverfront Commission recommends that the City employ Stanley Consultants to study the Sturgis Ferry sites (north and south) and make a recommendation regarding feasibility of a ramp at either site. If the consultants find neither site at Sturgis Ferry Park suitable, they should make an investigation of Napoleon Park for the same purpose. The Riverfront Commission strongly recommends that the City Council take steps to develop the Sturgis Corner riverfront area for recreational purposes particularly for access for shoreline fishermen and parking facilities. SUMMARY OF DISCUSSION: Chairperson Gilpin brought the meeting to order. The minutes of May 30, 1979 were adopted as written unanimously. Milkman introduced Jim Iioncin, the new CDBG Program Coordinator, Milkman also introduced Gretchen Tegler and Kathy Campbell, two summer interns who will be working on riverfront improvements. BOAT RAMP: Milkman explained her memo of 6/22/79 to the City Council which provides information for the Commission on the problems of a Sturgis Corner boat ramp. Gilpin attended the City Council meeting on June 19, 1979 and informed the Commission that the City Council was very concerned about the apparent unfeasibility of constructing a boat ramp at Sturgis Corner. Most Council members strongly favored construction of a boat ramp on the Iowa River, Council also asked for a yearly budget for riverfront improvements from the Commission. Knight asked who hired Stanley Consultants. Milkman said she and Gene Dietz from the Engineering Department had hired Stanley Consultants. Five firms were inter- viewed and Stanley had the meat experience. Berry asked who had done the prelimi- nary work with the Conservation Commission and on the boat ramp. Milkman said the City's Engineering Department which had no previous experience did the pre- liminary estimates for the boat ramp. Milkman indicated that a Conservation Commission representative had expressed some concern about the availability of parking. Milkman presented the plans from Stanley Consultants for the boat ramp and parking at Sturgis Corner. Additional parking and maneuvering space is needed for the area. Boutelle felt 40 foot long parking spaces were not needed for the whole area. Neuzil wondered why more property could not be acquired in the area, Milkman MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES IIDIIIES 13f9 i MINUTES IOWA CITY RIVERFRONT COMMISSION JUNE 27, 1979 -- 7:30 P.M. PAGE 2 explained the total cost of the lots adjacent to the ramp site was $100,000 to $225,000 and Braverman was not willing to subdivide the land. Other discussion centered around the length of the ramp, costs and the need for a retaining will. Alternate locations for a ramp, the Pollution Control Plant, Sturgis Ferry Park north, Sturgis Ferry Park south, and Napoleon Park were discussed. Gilpin said the Parks and Recreation Commission's budget includes a ramp in Napoleon Park in 1981. Fahr suggested that one reason for building a ramp at Stugis Corner was for rescue operations. Napoleon Park would not be suitable for rescue procedures because it is too far down the river, however, if the ramp is for recreational purposes, Napoleon Park would be ideal. If the ramp is built in Napoleon Park, Parks and Recreation may help with the funding. Gilpin said the entire remaining portion of the $75,000 could be used for the construction of the ramp and parking if necessary. Fahr asked what problems could be encountered with ownership of land at Sturgis Corner. Milkman pointed out that there is still some question to the nature of the interest held by the Airport Commission in this land, and she would get a legal opinion on this matter. Gilpin said the Airport Commission would probably ; be favorable to a boat ramp. Fountain said if the primary reason for building the ramp was for rescue then the Pollution Control site would be best. Gilpin said Sturgis Ferry Park provided unlimited parking. At Sturgis Corner the fishermen may complain due to the lack of parking facilities. Neuzil felt that a ramp should still be built at the Sturgis Corner site. Milkman said Stanley has made the preliminary evaluations for the other sites, now the Commission needed to decide if they want to spend additional funds for more detailed evaluations. After some further. discussion Fahr moved the following recommendation to the City Council: Considering that the Sturgis Corner site seems to be unfeasible for a boat ramp, the Riverfront Commission recommends that the City employ Stanley Consultants to study the Sturgis Ferry sites (north and south) and make a recommen- dation regarding feasibility of a ramp at either site. If the consultants find neither site at Sturgis Ferry Park suitable, they should make an investigation of Napoleon Park for the same purpose. Neuzil seconded; motion approved unanimously. Neuzil moved to strongly recommend to the City Council to take steps to develop the Sturgis Corner riverfront area for recreational purposes particularly for access for shoreline fishermen and parking facilities. Fahr seconded; motion approved 7-1, with Berry opposed. OTHER BUSINESS: The next meeting is scheduled for July 25 unless a special meeting is needed to consider the plans for a boat ramp. Milkman said the draft of the River Corridor Overlay Zone is complete and the Commission will be receiving it in the mail for review and consideration. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned. Julie Deevers, Senior Clerk Typist MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MONIES ii 1 MINUTES IOWA CITY PLANNING 6 ZONING COMMISSION INFORMAL MEETING JUNE 18, 1979 -- 7:30 P.M. CITY MANAGER'S CONFERENCE ROOM MEMBERS PRESENT: Jakobsen, Ogesen, Kammermeyer, Cain (left early) MEMBERS ABSENT: Lehman, Blum, Vetter STAFF PRESENT: Boothroy, Schmeiser Review of an innovative parking area design plan for American College Testing Program, located south of Old Solon Road (Old Dubuque Road) and southeast of I North Dodge Street. i j The "Innovative Parking Area Design Plan" for American College Testing Program is I to be revised according to Commission comments. Also staff is to discuss plan with City Forester; no action taken. S-7915. Public discussion of a final plat, PAD, and Large Scale Residential Develop- ment plan of Court Hill -Scott Boulevard, Part VII, located northeast of Amhurst Street; 45 -day limitation period: 7/25/79, 60 -day limitation period: 8/9/79. i Staff indicated that because the final plans deviate substantially from the approved j preliminary plans, the Commission may exercise the same discretion in its review of the preliminary plans and is not required to approve the final plans as submitted. Further discussion; no action taken. Discussion of the proposed schedule for review of the new zoning ordinance. Ground rules for the review of the new zoning ordinance were discussed. It was f agreed that a minimum of 4 members present were needed at every discussion with 3 votes required to recommend, and that time for discussion be limited. Also the Commission requested the staff prepare a letter to be sent to various organizations in town regarding the new zoning ordinance requesting written comments. I Discussion of a memo from Legal regarding application Z-7901. 1 Discussion; no action taken. Preparec MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOINES 13Sd I IOWA CITY HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION May 30, 1979 7:30 PM CITY MANAGER'S CONFERENCE ROOM MEMBERS PRESENT: Kuhn, Costantino, Reyes, Munzenmaier, Marcus, Yates. MEMBERS ABSENT: Braverman, unexcused; McGuire, McCartt, excused. STAFF PRESENT: Allen, Zukrowski, Brown, Ryan. VISITORS: Holly, Woolard, KCJJ Radio and Mary Abboud, KKIC Radio, RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE CITY COUNCIL: None RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE CITY MANAGER AND STAFF; Constantino asked Zukrowski and Ryan to research the subject of couples who cohabitate, and the fact that they can work together at job sites, but married people can't. Is this discrimination? Perhaps it is also an issue that should be mentioned in the monthly Human Rights Commission flier. SUMMARY OF RELEVANT DISCUSSION: 1. The May 30, 1979 meeting was called to order at 7:45 PM by Vice -Chairperson Kuhn in the absence of Braverman. Kuhn moved that the April 23, 1979 minutes be accepted as read and all Commissioners present voted aye. 2. Braverman corresponded with Susan Hester, President of NOW, expressing his appreciation on behalf of the Commission for contacting the Human Rights Commission regarding women's softball facilities, 3. City budget request was corresponded. A letter was sent to the City Manager regarding the Commission's concern to have the Human Relations Department review and report on each departmental budget request to see that it is in compliance with EEO laws and to inform the Human Rights Commission of any inadequacies. 4. Equal opportunity complaints. Braverman wrote to the City Manager to express the Commission's desire to know of any complaints in early stages of the action. In addition, the Commission talked about the City's role in handling City complaints. John Hayek wrote Mace and expressed that the Commission's role in handling City complaints is a role in an advisory capacity only. Members wanted to follow up MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOINES Human Rights mission May 30, 1979 Page 2 with Mace to see what correspondence was done after receiving the letter from John Hayek. They felt that some follow up was necessary if Mace had not already done so. Munzenmaier felt the Commission should have a very active role. Ryan explained the Commission does not have jurisdiction to take the City of Iowa City to court. It was questioned whether conciliation was included in the restrictions. Members would like to key in on credibility of the Commission. Ryan pointed out that different cities have different charters that govern them. 5. Review of Iowa legislative activity. Two of the items discussed under the legislative activity was age amendment and veteran's preference. Both clauses, as far as the City is concerned, are still being operated under the federal law until the state acts upon the law in their own capacity. 6. Orientation program. Zukrowski briefly reviewed three subjects under the orientation programs: A) Differences in protection offered, B) review of terms and C) summary to date. A Glossary of terms was also distributed. 7. New Business. Commission's annual report to the City Council. Mace and Sophie are to work on this during the weeks to come. The annual report is due July 15, 1979. i Commission Bylaws. Munzenmaier reported that some of his concerns were Commissioner attendance, committee structure, how.many meetings are required by members to attend, and how many excused absences are allowed. 8. Discussion was done regarding the summer schedule. After some discussion it was decided that August would be the month that the Commission would not meet as part of the summer schedule change. i. 9. In addition to new business, Brown distributed the Human Relations Department organizational chart and memorandum to the Human Rights Commissioners explaining changes in the roles and job descriptions of the members of the Human Relations Department. A. Committee Reports: 1. Affirmative Action: Chamber of Commerce Commissioner pending. No action had been taken yet. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOIRES Human Rights '�'nission May 30, 1979 Page 3 Compliance monitoring guide report due. Munzenmaier, Chair; Reyes and McCartt were the two other members of the Committee. No final report has yet been prepared. Blue Ribbon Subcommittee. Commission decided to support the Blue Ribbon Committee and monitor progress. The Chair is Yates. Brown is to meet with this Blue Ribbon Committee to discuss future plans. Commission priority projects. Linda McQuire, Chair. There was not report as McQuire was absent. i Baseball team resolution. Linda McQuire, Mace Braverman. Zukrowski reported that Showalter and Lee were very receptive and they are starting to work on the winter schedule of women's activities at the Recreation Center. Staff report was not printed yet and will be mailed to the Commissioner later. COMPLAINTS: Zukrowski reviewed the status of all the complaints as it appeared on the agenda. Some discussion about the complaints were the problems of getting witnesses and other involved persons to come into the office to talk to Zukrowski about certain complaint cases. Some suggestions were that when witnesses were contacted by letter, a deadline date be set to notify the complainant that a witness for their case had not responded to the letter and that if they wanted their case to be settled and handled in a smooth and quick manner they would need the witnesses to contact Zukrowski as soon as possible. This procedure would put more of the responsibility for helping resolve the case in the hands of the complainant. The Commissioners felt that the new bylaws should address time limits for these types of situations. Three questions for Commissioners to complete from the College of Business administration were referred to the Human Rights Commission by Art Breif. Commissioners requested Zukrowski to respond and ask for results of the questions. June meeting is June 25, 1979, 7:30 PM. The agenda setting is June 15, 1979 at 3:30 PM. Adjournment. Munzenmaier motioned, Yates seconded, all Commissioners present voted aye. The meeting adjourned at 9:55 PM. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES MINUTES IOWA CITY HOUSING APPEALS BOARD MAY 10, 1979 8:11 A.M. MEMBERS PRESENT: Pollock, VanderZee, Owens, Hillstrom MEMBERS ABSENT: Smithey, Klaus STAFF PRESENT: Kucharzak, Steinbach, Ryan, Barnes, Malone, Vezina, Kuebler SUMMARY OF DISCUSSION AND ACTION TAKEN Decisions of the Housing Appeals Board meetings of April 19 & 30, 1979, were read and approved. Kucharzak stated that the transcript of said hearing was not available at this time, however, when the minutes were completed they would be distributed to Board members for their review and adoption at the next regularly scheduled meeting of the Housing Appeals Board. Kucharzak introduced new staff members Steinbach; Senior Housing Inspector, Vezina and Kuebler; Housing Inspectors. Kucharzak stated that on May 8, 1979, the City Council heard concerns of the residents of Black's Gaslight Village. As a result, the Council scheduled time during their informal meeting on Monday, May 14, 1979, to hear discussion on Black's appeal and the action taken by the Housing Board of Appeals. Council requested that members of the Housing Appeals Board be present. TO CONSIDER THE CASE OF MR Chairman VanderZee swore in those who would testify. Kucharzak entered the City's documents and stated information of alleged violation of handrails on four units at Carriage Hill. Malone reviewed background information as contained in the staff report stating that, as he understood, Housing Code Chapter 9.30.4.I.2.(b), handrails are required at said locations. Kucharzak stated the violation notices and letter requesting an appeal were correctly filed. He also added that at the City Council's meeting on May 8, 1979, the Housing Code was modified and the changes would go into effect on May 19, 1979, after publication. Kucharzak further stated that the Code, as amended, would not grant relief from violations and he then asked that the Board sustain the City's order. Hibbs stated that he felt the order he had received had stretched the ordinance beyond the reasonable interpretation of the Code. He showed pictures of the steps in question and gave the approximate - I . ,..,__,-_ MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES 1101MES Iowa City Hous;")Appeals Board r May 10, 1979 Page 2 distance of the steps in relation to the dwellings and to the street. Hibbs read the applicable code and stated the definition of "exit" from the dictionary. He then stated the meaning of the term "egress." Hibbs contended that the word premises rather than the word dwelling in the code would constitute a violation. He went on to define both the terms "premises" and "dwelling" and restated his opinion that no violation existed. VanderZee asked if there were any elderly people living at Carriage Hill. Hibbs replied yes. He further added that the depth and width of the steps provided safe use. Hibbs stated that there are two alternative routes to leave the building. Kucharzak stated that these steps are a direct access from a private dwelling to a public way and that this order has continuously been enforced with this interpretation. Kucharzak stated that handrails had been installed a year ago in order for Code compliance, however, they had subsequently been removed. Hibbs stated that the handrails that were installed previously were indeed temporary. Ryan questioned whether the function of the steps changed with their location to the dwelling. Hibbs pointed out that there are other routes to leave once a person is outside of the building. Further discussion of terms ensued. Kucharzak stated views on enforcement ane proposed the question of safety liability. Hibbs stated that his insurance representative has inspected the steps and has not required handrails. Hillstrom moved that the violation not be upheld. Motion seconded. Motion carried three in favor, one opposed (VanderZee). Meeting took five minute recess. BOARD TO CONSIDER CASE OF JOHN PENNICK - 130 E. JEFFERSON STREET Attorney Tom Cilek present. Chairman swore in those who would testify. Kucharzak read applicable code, Chapter 9.30.6.A., Notice of Violation and letter requesting appeals hearing. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOVIES Iowa City Hous' Appeals Board May 10, 1979 Page 3 Barnes stated her findings upon reinspection and clarified those with blackboard drawings. In her opinion, of the six inspections that she did, only three were in violation of the Code. She also slowed photos of those dwelling units that she inspected. Kucahrzak agreed. Kucharzak suggested that the Housing Inspectors reinspect all dwelling units that were originally cited by Calef. It was also suggested that dwelling units N2, N37, and k48 be stricken from the letter of violation and others remain as written until such time of reinspection so that the violations cited are in direct reference to the Code. Cilek referred to the letter written by him to the City Council. He stated that the structure was built in 1851 and has been placed on the National Register of Historic Places. He further questioned making structural changes in buildings 7 having historical significance. Cilek suggested that remeasuring and re-evaluation of violations take place and those findings be presented at a later date to the Board. VanderZee questioned Cilek regarding the g g portion of the violation dealing with storm doors and windows. Cilek questioned the validity of the code requirements and asked that the sum of the violations be dealt.with at the same time. IKucharzak gave general code background in reference to its effect on the building located at 130 East Jefferson Street. Kucharzak supported the granting of a continuance on this case. Owens moved, Pollock seconded, that the case be continued by the Board. Board upheld the motion unanimously. Kucharzak and Cilek further explored code background and it was agreed that reinspections would be scheduled. I BDARD TO CONSIDER THE CASE OF MR. FRANK CARTHEY AND MR. DANIEL ZIOOR - 216 EAST FAIRCHILD ST. Carthey present and sworn in by Chairman. ' Kucharzak read letter requesting appeal from Carthey and Zioberek. Barnes stated her findings of reinspection stating that she had measured finished floor to finished ceiling and found that distance to be 6' 7". She also presented photos of said dwelling unit and clarified the actual violation. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES IIOIIIES Iowa City Hous;"+, Appeals Board ^ May 10, 1979 Page 4 Kucharzak supported her interpretation of the code. Carthey stated that the dwelling was in compliance with the code when he and Zioberek purchased it and he voiced his confusion as to why the code shows his property in violation at this later date. Kucharzak stated how this particular code came to be and asked the Board to sustain the violation. He further explained the City's responsibility to enforce the code. Carthey questioned the reason for older structures needing to comply with a newer code. Pollock questioned when this section of the code actually came into use. The exact date was not known. Ramifications of this particular code were discussed by Board members. Hillstrom moved, Owens seconded, that the Board uphold the cited violation. The Board upheld the motion unanimously. Kucharzak suggested that Carthey petition the Council on this matter. Kucharzak stated that the City would consider the duration of the tenant's lease as a reasonable time to vacate. The meeting took a five minute recess. BOARD TO CONSIDER THE CASE OF A. GILES WARRACK - 812E DAVENPORT ST A. Giles Warrack present and sworn in by Chairman. Kucharzak read the letter requesting an appeal. Barnes presented her findings and documented them with a photograph I} of the dwelling stating that she had originally been contacted by the previous owner Mrs. Adrian Flatt to'do an inspection on June 1, 1978. Barnes stated that on September 28, 1978 she proceeded to do a reinspection and discovered that the property had been sold to the Warrack's. She learned that they were unaware of the Notice of Violation. In October she delivered a copy of the letter and requested a letter of intent from them. She received no letter. Barnes stated that the ceiling heights on the first and second floors of the dwelling measured 6' 9". Kucharzak explained the obligation of the City to enforce the code upon a request even though the property is a single family dwelling. Warrack told of the age of the house and questioned enforcement on an owner -occupied dwelling. Kucharzak stated that the code has no provision granting relief in this type of situation. Kucharzak read Section G.6. Service of Notice clause that states ("notice" literally means being on public record). He also mentioned the problems that emerge in a situation such as this and suggested that the Warrack's seek legal assistance and/or peition the City Council. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES 110111ES Iowa City Hous Appeals Board !"1 May 10, 1979 Page 5 Pollock suggested that this case might constitute a "taking" such as is done in road construction. The Warrack's stated that their initial intention was to occupy the dwelling themselves rather than renting it. Kucharzak sought legal assistance however none was available at that time. The Board explored the idea of "what would happen if everyone abstained from a vote?" Owens moved, Hillstrom seconded, that the case be continued until the next meeting and that there be legal counsel available. The Board . upheld the motion unanimously. Kucharzak encouraged the same Board members present at the May 10; 1979 meeting to hear the continuances in the future. Meeting was adjourned. Y MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES IIOVIES .< /I MINUTES IOWA CITY HOUSING APPEALS BOARD MAY 18, 1979 8:30 A.M. MEMBERS PRESENT: Pollock, Owens, Smithey MEMBERS ABSENT: VanderZee, Hillstrom, Klaus STAFF PRESENT: Kucharzak, Ryan, Steinbach, Vezina BOARD TO RECONSIDER THE CASE OF BLACK'S GASLIGHT VILLI Those who would testifv were sworn in by Chairman Smithey. Kucharzak asked for clarification of who the people were that were sworn 'in to testify. They were identified by spokesman Juilfs. Kucharzak stated that the City had no new evidence to enter into the record. Juilfs read letters from Fay's Fire Equipment, Inc. and Rocca Welding and Repair, both of which are contract companies involved in the construction and installation of fire escapes needed at 414 Brown Street. The letters stated that due to circumstances beyond their control they would probably be unable to meet the June 1, 1979 deadline. They both asked for time extensions. Juilfs then read a letter from Mori Costantino of 407 Brown Street_ This letter questioned whether or not the City was taking a responsible stand in this case. Smithey suggested that the three letters be entered into the public record. Juilfs stated that the inability of the contractors to meet the June 1, 1979 deadline was the reason the tenants of Black's Gaslight Village requested the hearing. Flemming stated that she felt the meeting was untimely and that more people would have been present if held at a later date. She added that it was the contractor's responsibility, not the tenants', nor Mrs. Black's, to get the fire escapes installed. Flemming voiced concern that different members of the Appeals Board have attended separate hearings. Smithey replied that no one has control over that situation. Smithey stated that he felt the violation regarding fire escapes was the most serious of those cited. Flemming stated that at Black's there is always someone home and awake so all fires would be reported immediately, therefore, reducing the. risk of danger to the residents. --- MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 110114ES 1 ?53 L _. Iowa City Housing Appeals Board May 18, 1979 Page -2 Smithey asked when the violation of two means of egress was cited. Kucharzak stated that the violation was originally cited in the 1960's, however, the Board need only be concerned with the violation which was cited on April 13, 1978. Service was made on April 18, 1978. The violation was never appealed. Smithey stated that he felt the ultimate responsibility for code compliance rested with Mrs. Black. He further stated that the City has a certain amount of liability in enforcing the code and that the code not only protects the residents, but visitors and the general public as well. Juilfs felt that the City relieves itself of responsibility when it notifies a tenant of a code violation. Smithey expressed his doubts about Juilfs' statem3nt. Flemming stated that Mrs. Black had a $124 phone bill (last month) in connection with trying to find someone to do the work. She further stated that the Fire Marshal had not been responsive in this matter. Kucharzak clarified the fact that the housing inspector does not determine the route for the second means of egress nor the type of fire escape needed. Those responsibilities belong to the Fire Marshal. The Fire Marshal was notified February 17, 1978 of the fire escape concern at Black's. Juilfs asked that an additional 60 days be granted to install the fire escapes. Pollock voiced concern regarding the Fire Marshal's involvement. Kenney stated that he did not feel that the Fire Marshal, nor the Fire Marshal's office, had in any way caused a delay in the installation of the fire escapes. He also stated that it was his opinion, after speaking to Mike Rocca, that the fire escapes would be installed by June 1, 1979. He added that Rocca Welding is in possession of the specifications used by the Fire Marshal for fire escapes. Kuzharzak explained to the Board what the sequence of events had been prior to the hearing and what the procedures would be after the hearing depending upon the variables involved. Kucharzak asked that the names of all people affected by the decision be read into the record so that the proceedings would be proper. The names, without addresses, were read into the record by Juilfs and Smithey. i Kucharzak asked Juilfs if he had been asked to represent those people who were affected by the hearing. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOVIES Iowa City Housing Appeals Board May 18, 1979 Page•3 Juilfs answered that he was representing the interest of those people with the exception of one tenant who was out of town. Pollock moved that there be a 60 day time extension in reference to the citation. No second. Pollock moved that there be a 30 day time extension in reference to the citation. No second. Pollock moved that the Board uphold the citation as presently cited. Owens seconded. Motion carried unanimously. Meeting was adjourned. PREPARED APPROVED MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAFIDS•DES MO RIES Lo M I NIPITS ' SENIOR CENTER COMMISSION .LUNE 20, 1979 -- 7:011 P.M. CITY MANAGER'S CONFERENCE ROOM MEMBERS PRESENT: Ambrisco, Bourgeois, Sando, Scott, Summerwill MEMBERS ABSENT: Carlton, Williams STAFF PRESENT: Berlin, Deevers, Meisel GUESTS: Bill Nowysz, John Pfiffner RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL: That the City Manager proceed with receiving approval of the City Council for the pre- liminary design plans for the Senior Center with the provision that the architects pro- vide an estimate of the additional cost for the mezzanine to be extended across the middle of the first floor. VIEWING OF THE SENIOR CENTER SITE: The Commissioners and staff met with Nowysz at the Old Post Office. Nowysz explained how the building dictated certain design of spaces. He also pointed out the spaces which must be preserved because of their historical significance. Sando and Scott suggested ! that a large corner room on the third floor be appropriated as an exercise room for Senior Center participants. i SUMMARY OF DISCUSSION: Meisel, staff liason, brought the meeting to order as Chairperson Carlton was absent. Ambrisco moved to adopt the minutes of June 6, 1979 as read, Sando seconded, minutes were approved unanimously. ADOPTION OF BYLAWS: i j Summerwill moved to adopt the Senior Center bylaws, Ambrisco seconded, vote unanimous. ii j ELECTION OF. OFFICERS: { Ambrisco nominated Scott to be Vice Chairperson, Summerwill seconded. Ambrisco moved to mase the nominations and to unanimously elect Scott as Vice Chairperson. Vote unanimous. Ambrisco nominated Sando to be secretary, Bourgeois seconded. Summerwill moved to cease nominations and to cast a unanimous vote for Sando. Vote unanimous. 'j VIEWING OF THE SENIOR CENTER DESIGN PLANS: li Bill Nowysz and John Pfiffner, architects for the firm of Wehner, Nowysz, Pattschull and Pfiffner, were present to discuss the design plans for the Center. Nowysz distributed copies of the preliminary cost estimates for the Center rehabilitation. Nowysz then presented the preliminary design plans for the Senior Center. The mezzanine floor will be left open over the main space. Administration offices and a library lounge will be located on the mezzanine level. Scott felt it would be too noisy with'the open space and the balcony. Sando said the administrative office of the Program Director should be located with the activities. There was discussion around the question of the services area being on the lower level in the congested traffic area. Sando added 11 MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES FIOIIIEs MINUTES SENIOR CENTER C0141ISSIoN JUNE: 20, 1979 -- 7:00 P.M. PAGE 2 that from experience in other centers the offices of service personnel are more often placed a little removed from the activities area. The Conference Room should be left on the mezzanine. Sando commented that the lower level would be very congested with the elevator and the services. Berlin reminded the Commission this was the last meeting in which changes could be made. The Commission decided to locate the Director in the Old Post Master's office on the main level, and the secretary in the adjacent lobby area, and the Program specialist and other general administration on the mezzanine. Meisel asked if there could be a space designed for interviewing. Nowysz suggested the exam room in the health complex in the lower level for this purpose. Meisel suggested dividing off a room in the library lounge for the Social Service people if they decided to be located in the Center. Pfiffner said the library lounge in the mezzanine should be left as is and in the future if the office space is required it could be divided. Nowysz said there will be an extended stairway on the northside to the second floor. When the stairs reach the second floor the hallway turns 900 so the present restrooms will not have to be replaced. The ramp, on the northside of the building will be a scissored type ramp with an ongrade entrance. Pfiffner explained the kitchen design and distributed copies of the cost estimates. He then read a letter from Bob Welsh' asking that the internal layout of the kitchen be redesigned. Berlin asked when the plans would be expected to be returned to Welsh for approval. Pfiffner said the plans had been redesigned according to the requests and could be returned to Welsh at any time. Berlin said the plans needed to go to the City Council and suggested giving a deadline for approval. The next City Council meeting is scheduled for July 2 at which time the Senior Center plans should be discussed. reminded the Commission that every delay for City Council approval meant delay in coBerlin n- . i struction. Ambrisco asked if the automatic sprinkler system had ever been discussed Pfiffner said the range hood had a dry powder system which was totally interlocked w the other sprinkler systems. ith J Summerwill felt the space was not being utilized to the utmost because there is room for three floors. Berlin explained there was not enough money for three floors. Scott asked if a whole floor instead of a mezzanine had been considered. Nowysz said the flexability of the bids for a whole floor could be $50,000 either way. Berlin suggested designing an alternate floor and getting a closer estimate on cost. Nowysz said they could not extend over the whole floor because of Federal government's request to his- torically preserve the lobby. Berlin suggested constructing the floor across the middle. Sando moved to recommend to City Council that the City Manager proceed.with receiving approval of the City Council for the preliminary design plans for the Senior Center with !. the provision that the architects provide an estimate of the additional cost for the mezzanine floor to be extended across the middle of the first floor. Ambrisco seconded, motion was approved unanimously. DISCUSSION OF SENIOR CENTER ACQUISITION FUNDS: Meisel distributed a resolution for the Establishment of a Commission for the Management Of Gifts and Memorials to the Multi-purpose Senior Center. This item will be discussed at the next Senior Center Commission meeting. ROLE OF COUNCIL OF ELDERS: Meisel explained that the Council of Elders (Co E) was a group of people 55 or over who MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MONIES i f - I i MINUTES SENIOR CENTER COMMISSION JUNE 20, 1979 -- 7:00 P.M. PAGE 3 want the Senior Center and are willing to give their time to help develop the Center. The CoE does not want to be a policy making board. Summerwill suggested having an infomal meeting with the CoE members. Berlin suggested that the Officers be asked to attend a Senior Center Commission meeting to gather ideas. Berlin asked the Commission members to come to the next meeting with ideas on how the CoE can help. OTHER: Berlin excused Meisel and Deevers so that he and the Commission members could discuss the position of the Senior Center Director. Written By: Approved by: Secretary of the Senior Center Commission MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOINES u MINUTES: IOWA CITY A114POR11' ('OMM SSION MAY 24, 1979 IOWA CITY MUN1('1PAl, AliwoRT MEMBERS PRESENT: Bleckwenn, Embree, Phipps, Kedick, Saeugling OTHERS PRESENT: Ekhard 'Ziegler, Lois Carroll, Gundula Bosch, Raymond Tannons, John D. Shanley, Lynn Hansen, Lois Hatch, Sue Young, K. Gleaves, Dennis Gordon, Leo Brachenbach, John Redick, Sue Lee, Ken Lowder, Earl Ossoinig, E.K. Jones, JY. SUMMARY OF DISCUSSION AND ACTIONS TAKEN: Chairman Phipps called the meeting to order at 7:30 P.M. and asked the Commission'to rescind all their actions of the May 17th meeting. It was moved by Embree, seconded by Redick to rescind all actions by the Commission at their May 17, 1979 meeting. Motion carried. I It was moved by Embree, seconded by Redick that the minutes of last months meeting be approved. Motion carried. Embree made a motion, seconded by Bleckwenn to approve the bills for the month. Motion carried. Awarding of the contract for the additional hardsurface tie -down i area. It was moved by Bleckwenn, seconded by Redick to award the contract, subject to receiving the funds from the i.D.O.T., to the low bidder L.L. Pelting Company in the amount of $22,821.05. Motion carried unamously. f I Mr. Tom Alberhasky resubmitted a proposal to lease an area immed- lately west of his property located at the northeast corner or the airport with the corrections the Commission had requested at. their April meeting. It was moved by Bleckwenn, seconded by 9 Embree to authorize the chairman to sign the proposed lease between Alberhasky and the Commission once the lease has been drawn up. Motion carried. A proposal for crop hail insurance was submittedby Doane Agricul- ? tural Service. Seventy-two acres of corn at 85.00 seventy-one acres of beans at 60.00 per acre and not to exceed $10,380.00 for $248.00 dollars. fMovedxbyuRedickrance seconded by Bleckwenn to purchase the insurance. Motion carried. Redick made a formal motion stating, "The Iowa Cil.y Municipal Air- port Commission voted to prohibit all pilots with student status licenses from taking off on runways 35 and 30 between the hours or 4100 P.M. and 9:00 P.M., seven days a week. Landing on runway 17 and 12 would be permitted to all pilots during this period. This Policy would become effective June 1, 1979 and be subject to i' review by the Airport Commission at its September, 1979 regular meeting. This restriction also applies to students while they are receiving i dual instruction. i 135.5 i MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB 1 CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES -2 - Redick explained the reason for such a motion was to alleviate the noise problem the resident-: living off the end of those run- ways were experiencing. There followed a long discussion Con- cerning whether or not it. was rrasibk- or loyal to adopt. such a restriction for noise abatement .ind whether or not the mo Lion would restrict the use of the airport, by the flying service's student.s. Redick read a presentation entitled "Airport Noise -How it Compares" addressed to the Iowa City Community through the Iowa City Airport Commission prepared by Dennis P. Bordon. (Copy attached to these minutes) It was the opinion of the majority of the Commission that the only way to find out whether these restrictions would work was to give it a try and see what would happen. As for the enforcement, Redick asked that the Manager enforce the regulation on the fixed base operator's students and employees. The manager attempted to emphasise that prior to the implementation of any regulation, the Commission should check with the F.A.A., State I.D.O.T. and the Commission attorney to see whether or not Lhe Commission can do it. The manager attempted to point out that the Federal Aviation Agency and the I.D.O.T. have control over the airspace around the airport and over Iowa City. It was also pointed out that in the 19 years the present- fixed base operator has been aL Iowa City there has only been two incidents involving students and no one was hurt.. The majority of the pilots arc very careful and are aware of the noise bothering some areas and they attempt. to stay away from those areas, but sometimes they can't. It was pointed out that such a restriction will encourage pilots, not capable of using a runway other than the favored runway to use: them increasing Lhe danger of intersection collisions and mid-air collisions ds the Lransil pilot will uso Lhc runway Lha wind tetrahedron favor. The manager pointed out Lhat Lo implement the student restriction would mean the only safe means of traffic seperation would be by the establishment of a control tower. The chairman pointed out that the Commission is in the process of having a Master Plan done and if the Commission would just wait until it was completed many of the issues would be answered. Mr. Gordon pointed out to the Commission that in the material sent to him by the E.P.A. that nothing should be attempted by the E.P.A. to restrict or change the flow of traffic established by the F.A.A. the reason being the Commission would have to assume responsibility in case the change or restriction cont.rlbuled to an accident Chairman Phipps pointed out he felt any such proposal was bad and was establishing a dangerous precedent and he hoped each Commission member has only the interests of the Iowa City Airport and its operation as it applies to all the citizens of Iowa City in general and asked each member 1-o consider this when they vote. Redick read the motion again, was seconded by Saeugling. (Motion carried with Embree, Redick and Saeugling voting aye, Bleckwenn and Phipps voting nay. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICRDLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES WINES 14 h< Chairman Phipps asked Lhe C'ommission's approval to contact: Lhe Commission's attorney concerning I:ho A.lberhasky lease. it was moved by Embree, seconded by Bleckwenn to have the Chairman contact the attorney. Motion carried. j Kevin Gleaves brought up the question of "hang gliders", and would like to have permission to fly one off the Iowa City Airport. General discussion followed. Phipps brought up for discussion that the Airport Manager had pointed out the government mandatory price and allocation on aviation fuel had expired effective last February 26th, which had been reported to the Commission in his March report and felt the Commission should consider raising the flowage fee. The Commission last December had decided that once the controls were recinded and it was agreeable with the leasee to ammend his lease, the Commission would negotiate to raise the flowage fee from two to three cents. The Fixed Base Operator agreed it was wrong for the Commission to receive 2 cents per gallon, with all of the increased costs, but pointed out they might need a public hearing also, or check with their attorney. It was moved by Embree, seconded by Bleckwenn to have the Chairman check with their attorney concerning the amendment to the lease and whether or not they need a public hearing. Motion carried. Ken Lowder reported the First Phase is completed on measuring noise around the airport. The noise level in and around the airport is reasonable in some cases - the noise level is also reasonably loud due to garbage trucks, which happen to come by. There are no recommendations at this time. The manager presented literature on retrocffective airport markers for I.axi-ways to the terminal building. It was moved by Bleckwenn, seconded by Embree to have the manager look in to the cost or purchasing and installing Lhe units at the Iowa City Airport. Motion carried. The next meeting was scheduled for June 28, 1979. Meeting adjourned. 0;7. . MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES J 1 The drone of an airplane overhead may be music to your ears, but for the•slumbering nonflyer next door it can be as grating as the gleeful band of trash collectors seeking to finish a day's work between 5 and 6 a.m. As Iowa City has spread, the airport and residences have become wedged together. The fact that "the airport was here first" presents an unconvincing argument to homeowners who have established their homes off the departure end of the runway. Maybe they knew, the airport was there and thought it wouldn't be a problem. Others acquired housing ignorant of the nearby airstrip. [dost people can live with airplane nois--particularly the sounds generaged from a general aviation airport. Those sounds are a lot more timid than a cacophony of trucks, sirens, construc- tion sites, and motorcycles that one confronts walking down a' street. But for some people the intrusion of airplane sound into their home, is a source of irritation that becomes magnified because airplanes are conspicuous, unfamiliar, and may be perceived as unnecessary. In many cases, too, people may transfer a subconscious fear of an airplane crash in their neighborhood into anxiety over the plane's noise. The FAA has set noise standards for machines that fly, and all users of the airspace agree that noise standards or limitations should be applied uniformly throughout the country. Most pilots would argue, too, that any noise standards set in a community should —,-• . MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROIAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES 2 be applied equally and fairly to all noise sources --not just airplanes. But while all the legal :iassles are being played out in the courts, state legislatures, and city halls around the country, Pilots need to realize that their aircraft do, in fact, make noise; that there are people underneath them who detest that noise. While the manufacturers continue to take steps to quiet V airplanes that roll from their plants, the way a pilot operates his airplane today can effect changes in the sound at the ground. Obviously, safety in flight is the first concern of any aircraft operation. The following recommendations are not intended to introduce or create any unsafe operational conditions. 'I And they are not a cure for aircraft noise but, instead, represent steps that can be taken today toward a good neighbor i policy and the pilots respect for our friends who live around the I � airport. F PILOTS: HERE'S WHAT WE CAN DO... i Be aware of noise -sensitive areas, particularly residential areas near the airport. Avoid flying low over them. { Fly traffic patterns tight and high, i gkeeping in g your airplane in as close to the field as possible. j In constant -speed prop airplanes, do not use high rpm settings in the pattern. Prop noise from high-performance singles and twins increases drastically at high rpm. On takeoff, reduce to cruise climb power as soon as safe and j' practical. ! ..Climb after liftoff at best angle of climb speed until cross- ing the airport boundary, then climb at best rate. I � I � I I � I { i I i ' MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES i i 3 Depart from the start of the runways, rather than inter- sections, for the highest possible altitude when leaving the air- port vicinity. i Try low-power or gliding landings, and avoid like the plague low, dragged in approaches. .If you want to practice night landings. Do you practice at major fields where a smaller airplane's sound is less obtrusive. INSTRUCTORS: Here's what we can do Teach noise abatement to all students, including pilots you take up for their biennial flight reviews. Treat noise education i as you would any other element of instruction. .Know noise sensitive areas and point them out as you come i and go with your students. .Assure that your students fly at or above the recommended pattern altitude, and remind them constantly that airplanes will land quite successfully with low power settings. .Assure that you and your students practice maneuvers over unpopulated areas. Vary practice areas so that same locale is not subjected to repeated flight training exposure. .During practice of ground -reference maneuvers be particularly aware of houses and businesses near the flight path. .Stress that high rpm prop settings are reserved for takeoff and for short final, but not for flying the pattern. Pushing prop rpm to high results in extra noise. FIXED BASE OPERATOR Here's what you can do Identify noise -sensitive areas near your airport and create abatement flight patterns. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOINES 0 4 .Post the anti -noise procedures neatly and prominently, and remind pilots who rent your airplanes or fly from your airport of the importance of adhering to them. Mail mimeographed copies of noise -abatement patterns with monthly hangar and tiedown bills. Post anti -noise departure procedures and headings on signs at departure ends of runways and in runup areas. I .Assure your flight instructors are teaching noise awareness. Call•for use of the least noise -sensitive runway whenever wind conditions permit. Try to minimize high touch-and-go training. .Establish a 1,000 -foot agl pattern (as recommended by the FAA) I I .Respond professionally, knowledgeably, and courteously to airport neighbors who call with noise complaints. Try to determine if reports are coming in from a particular locale, or are about a particular airplane. Then do something to alleviate the problem. .If you have a chronic complainer, make a personal visit to his home for a calm discussion of the problem. Invite him to the airport, and possibly for an airplane ride, for a firsthand look at what the airport is doing to reduce noise in the area. The VASI lights will help pilots prevent low, dragging approaches. AIRPORT COMMISSION Here's what you can do .Send a copy of the noise abatement procedures established for the airport, with a brief explanation of its purpose, to local newspapers. Let the public know pilots are concerned. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES 110IRES ! 1 5 See that the pattern, approach, and departure paths around the airport are designated on official zoning and planning maps so real estate activity is conducted in full awareness of such areas. Lobby for land -use zoning, and building codes in these areas that are compatible with airport activity, and will protect neigh- boring inhabitants. .Stress, publicize, communicate the value of the airport to the community and how its operation adds to the safety, economy and over all worth of Iowa City. .Sponsor "aviation days" at the airport to involve nonflyers with the business of aviation. .Encourage "beautification" projects at the airport. Trees and bushes around runup and departure areas have proven quite effective in absorbing ground noise from airplanes. These recommendations are within the guidelines of the "Model Community Noise Control Ordinance" Section 6.2.8 Airport and Aircraft Operation published by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA 550/9-76- 003) pp. 30, pp. 46, Sept. 1975 Other references. EPA Noise Control Program --Progress to Date pp. 14', pp. 15, pp. 16, March 1978. EPA Noise A Health Problem August 1978. EPA Airport Noise Abatement Planning June 1977. EPA Report on Aircraft --Airport Noise August 1973 Public Law 92-574 Enacted 92nd Congress, H.R. 11021 October 1972 EPA Regional Assistance to State and Local Noise Programs See pp. 20, pp• 25, pp. 28. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOINES a 6 AIRPORT AND AIRCRAFT OPERATIONS (a) The SPO/NCO shall consult with the airport proprietor to recom- mend changes in airport operations to minimize any noise dis- turbance -•which the airport owner may have authority to control in its capacity as proprietor. (b) Nothing in this section shall be construed to prohibit, restrict, penalize, enjoin, or in any manner regulate the movement of aircraft which are in all aspects conducted in accordance with, or purduant to, applicable Federal laws or regulations. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES 110RIES I I i ii 1� I i, I 6 AIRPORT AND AIRCRAFT OPERATIONS (a) The SPO/NCO shall consult with the airport proprietor to recom- mend changes in airport operations to minimize any noise dis- turbance -•which the airport owner may have authority to control in its capacity as proprietor. (b) Nothing in this section shall be construed to prohibit, restrict, penalize, enjoin, or in any manner regulate the movement of aircraft which are in all aspects conducted in accordance with, or purduant to, applicable Federal laws or regulations. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES 110RIES I Table 4. Continuous Sound Levels which Pose an Immediate Threat to Healthand Welfare (Measured at Receiver)* Sound level limit (dBA) Duration 90 24 hours 93 12 hours i I 96 6 hours I I � 99 3 hours ! 102 1.5 hours 105 45 minutes i 108 22 minutes I j ! *Use equal energy time-intensity tradeoff if level varies; find energy equivalent over 24 hours. , 4 1 i Table 5. Impulsive Sound Levels which Pose an Immediate Threat - to Health and Welfare (Measured at Receiver)* I Number of repetitions f Sound level limit (dB) per 24 hour period 145 1 I 135 10 125 IOD 1i I i i ! ! MICROFILMED BY 1 ( JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS-DES FIOIIIES i SOUNL LEVEL ICOMPI 1ISONS dB Threshold of pain Rock group _ I l• �,. • Heavy truck p� i !� -; E-- CenvmetMnd speech It'• Llbnry !� �I I r� 7 'I �iF �• lk 11 l.. Bedroom .I.muety 1978 G 130 120 110 Electronic elan 100—>,: .y. pneumatic drill 80-�""'.. .70 Avenge strut tralic VV /udneu office -50� i -30 f;l:,; L Living room �� ~ 20 r t, r., ; r;1 t •. �7 10 i u ,0 Threshold of hearing ke ,flirt wIr'ni ni•ur nftrinuHum MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 110HIE5 r r,4 Sound levels in decibels (dB) are calculated on a logarithmic basis. An increase of 10 decibels represents a 10 -fold increase in acoustic energy while an increase of 20 decibels corresponds to a 100 -fold increase in acoustic energy. - However, the human ear also works logarithmically. Hence, our perception of the noise increase (loudness) works in such a way that each 10 dB Increase in sound level is perceived as approximately a doubling of loudness: The weighted A scale approximates the frequency response of the human ear by placing most emphasis on the frequency range of 1000 to 6000 Hertz. Sound levels measured using A -weighting are often expressed as dBA, and is the scale used for measuring small propeller -driven aircraft noise. Effective Precelved Noise Level in decibels (EMB) is the noise level corrected for differences in tone and noise duration. Generally speaking, EPNdB can be roughly calculated by adding 13 to the dBA measured noise level. EPNdB is used in the measurement of turbine -engine aircraft noise. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 1101MES PROPELLER -DRIVEN SMALL AIRPLANE NOISE Airplane maximum certificated takeoff weight (W) —pounds 0 600 1000 1500 2000 3000 4000 5000 5700 Kilograms MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB FDA!' 4APi05•:II •101:1[ BEECH B"' - SPORT BC23 - SUNDOWNER B2AR - SIERRA BF33A - BONANZA 9V3SB - BONANZA BB55 -BARON SE55 - BARON 8860'- DUKE 8050 -GUEEN AIR OC90 - KING AIR CESSNA 0150 - CESSNA 150 ll C. - SKYHAWK 1 0177RG - CARDINAL RG C-182 - SKYLANE C.U206 - STATIONAIR 07210 - CENTURION W10 - CESSNA 310 0337 - SKYMASTER C-340- CESSNA 340 0402 - CESSNA 402 C•414 - CESSNA 914 0421 - GOLDEN EAGLE BELLANCA 17.30A - VIKING 17.31A - VIKING 17.31ATC - TURBO -VIKING GRUMMAN AMERICAN AA' III- TRAINER M -1C - TRAVELER PIPER PA28.140 - CHEROKEE 140 PA28.151 - WARRIOR PA28•11200 - ARROW PA28-235 - CHARGER PA32-300 - CHEROKEF PA23.250 - AZTEC PA31.325 - NAVAJO PA31*350 - CHIEFTAIN PA31T - CHEYENNE ROCKWELL INTERNATIONAL 8112- ROCKWELL 112 15005 - SHRINE COMMANDE R605 - AERO COMMANDER R69OA - TURBO COMMANDO • Single * Twin 00 AO PA APTI11977 B FOWA AERONAUTICS DIVISION SIATECARTOL UES MOINES. IOWA M319 515 28142M June 4, 1979 REF, NO. Mr. E. K. Jones, Manager Iowa City Municipal Airport Iowa City, Iowa 52240 Dear Mr. Jones: We have been advised of a resolution by your Airport Commission which prohibits student pilots from taking off on Runways 35 and 30 between the hours of four and nine p.m. We feel that your Commission should be made aware of Chapter' 328.19, Code of Iowa, (copy attached) which requires municipal airports to "adopt safe air traffic patterns" To restrict student pilots from take -off' on 35 and 30 would be inviting downwind and crosswind take—offs by a group least able to handle those conditions. Without an Air Traffic Control Tower, you are apt to have a mix of traffic operating in opposite directions. Both of the foregoing situations present an unacceptable possibility for an accident. If we can assist in any way in resolving this problem, please do not hesitate to call on us. Sincerely, JACK GRIFFITH Aviation Specialist JG:de Enc. cc: Mr. Wm. Sasser, Chief Airports Division, FAA COMMISSIONERS JULESM. BUSKER BARBARI DUNN DONALD K.OARONER WILUAMF.McORATN ROBERTA. RIOLER ALLAN TnOMS•fs�nr9R%K'MMn4wn'. FtICROFILME BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES NOINES c, �r. ar• lir• b. g•1' f„• r'la t of 1Lo Wal the lent. 1 ti, Ow t i• Ln•• s,n• z 1667 of the project, except for those contractual stipula- tions agreed to by all parties prior to receipt of state funds. 2. The department shall include in the annual re- port made by the department to the governor a re- port of all federal moneys it accepts, receives and re- ceipts for under the provisions of this section. [1346, .i0, 54, 58, 62, 66, 71, 73, 75, 77,6328.141 Penrod u 111/22116 328.15 Contracts -law governing. All contracts for the planning, acquisition, construction, improve- ment, maintenance, and operation of airports, or other air navigation facilities made by the depart- ment, either as the agent of this state or of any gov- ernmental sub,livision, shall be made pursuant to the laws of this slate governing the making of like con- tracts; provided, however, that where such undertak- ing is financed wholly or partially with federal mon- eys, the department, as such agent, or the govern- mental subdivision acting for itself, may let contracts in the manner prescribed by the federal authorities, acting under the laws of the United States, and any rules or regulations made thereunder, notwithstand- ing any other state law to the contrary. [C46, 50, 54, 50, 62,66, 71, 73, 75, 77,1328. 151 328.16 Disposition of federal funds. All moneys accepted for disbursement by the department pursu- ant to section 328.14 shall be deposited in the state treasury, and, unless otherwise proscribed by the uu- thor ty from which the money is received, kept in sep� ante funds, designated according to the purposes for which the moneys were made available, and held by the state in trust for such purposes. All such money's in hereby appropriated for the purposes for which Ur same were made available, to be expended in ac- cordance with federal laws and regulations anal with this chapter. The department is authorized, whether acting for this state or as the agent of any of its gov- amental subdivisions, or when requested by the C1lited States government or any agency or depert- lamt thereof, to disburse such moneys for the desig• stated purposes, but this shall not preclude any other 14I110rited method of disbursement. [C46, 50, 54, 58, 466,71,73,75,77,§328.161 I1M17 and 328.18 Repealed by 65CA, ch 1190, M19 Registration. L The department shall promulgate rules pursu. tt us the provisions of chapter 17A governing the is. assaare by the department of certificates of registra- k�ti`to all airports in this state which are open for use Public and governing the annual renewal of certificates. These rules shall require that an libliert applying for a certificate of,regislralion or �a renewal shall comply with minimum standards �Vety a I promulgated by the department, adopt air traffic pattern, and demonstrate that such baffle patterns aresafely co-ordinated with those ob esitting airports and approved airport sites in �nty before the certificates of registration or �feate of renewal may he issued. (irtificates of �lnVon or renewal may be issued subject to tiny �tdtons the department deems necessary to carry BEST. DOCUMENT AVAILABLE AERONAUTICS, gs_.x.20 out the purposes of this section. The department may after notice and opportunity for hearing as provided in chapter 17A, revoke any certificate of registration or renewal, or may refuse to issue a renewal, when it determines: a. That there has been an abandonment of the airportas such; I b. That there has been a failure to comply with the conditions of the registration or renewal thereof: or c. That because of change of physical or legal con- ditinns or circumstances the airort has become ei- ther unsafe or unusable for the aeronautical purposes for which the registration or renewal was issued. 2. The department shall promulgate rules pursu- ant to the provisions of chapter 17A governing the is- suance by the department of certificates of airport site approval. These rules shall provide that any per- son or governmental subdivision desiring or planning to construct or establish an airport shall obtain a cer- tifdl'a6te of site approval prior to acquisition of the site or prior to the construction or establishment of the airport. The department shall charge a reasonable fee, bused on the cost of a safely inspection pf the site approval application, for the issuance of a certificate of site approval, and shall issue such a certificate if it finds: a. That the site is adequate for the propruseJ air- port; 5. That such proposed airport, if constructed or established, will conform to minimum standards of safety as promulgated by the department; and c. That safe air traffic pa}terns are esdlblished for the proposed airport which are safely co•ordi- noted with the traffic patterns of all existing airports and approved airport sites in its vicinity. 3. A certificate of site approval shall remain in ef- fect until a certificate of registration his been issued to an airport located on the approved site as provided in subsection 1, unless the department, after notice and opportunity for hearing, revokes the certificate of site approval upon a finding that: a. There has been an abandonment of the site as an airport site; b. There has been a failure within two years to develop the site as an airport, or to comply with the - conditions of the approval; or • c. Because of change of physical or legal condi. tions or circumstances the site is no longer usable for the aeronautical purposes far which the approval was granted. 4. No certificate of site approval shall le required for the site of any existing airport. 5. In considering an application for approval of a pmposed'airport site or the issuance of an airport registration certificate under subsections I and 2, the department may, an its own motion or upon the re• queslof an affected or interested person, hold a hear. Ing au provided in chapter 17A. [G31, x5,§9.938 -c•2; C39,16338.15; C46, 50, 54, 58, 62, 66, 71, 73, 75, 7T §328.191 aefrnnl In an 111'2136,10113 328.20 Registration of aircraft. Every civil air. craftowned either wholly or in part by persons resid. ing in this stale, unless specifically excepted under MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MINES '11111.1 L,' r l.nnl.l:'. A. F!uw:rl 'T.ru 1:11 !'1N nrG 1..'Nnl.n l:n Pv!\nr' Tu:: nl:u nnn w-. i!!iir.1.1�InN SHULMAN, PHELAN, TUCKER, BoYLE &/MULLEN ATTORNEYS AT LAW IINI:MI:N 11III1.01NG r. [I. 11ux J.o.o IOWA CITY, IOWA 52240 Mr. Dick Phipps, Chairman Iowa City Airport Commission 825 Normandy Drive Iowa City, Iowa 52240 Dear Dick, June 12, 1979 I have two matters which I wish to call to your attention. The first is in reference to the McCrabb lease. I wrote a letter to Jim McCrabb at McCrabb Engineering in West Liberty and sent the letter certified. In the letter I advised him that I had been informed that he had not paid the rent as provided under the terms of his lease and that the notice I was giving'to him constituted a three day notice to correct such matter or that a forcible entry and detainer action would be instituted against him to vacate said premises. On June 11, I received a telephone call from him advising that he had received my letter and the reason he had not paid the rent was that he had made a formal request approximately sixty days ago that he be allowed to sub - rent the property to somebody else and that the matter had been tabled by the Airport Commission; and he was waiting for a response. 'f. 1.1 NN,... Imp r n Cooc S c.l I indicated to him that the failure of the Board to respond to such request did not relieve him from the responsibility of payment of rent. tie admitted such fact and stated that he would forward the delinquent rent which he felt was solely for the month of June. I have no know- ledge as to the amount of rent which he has either paid or nonpaid, but I advised him that he should pay all rent which was due under the terms and provisions of his lease. If he does do this, he is.entitled to continued possession. In MCROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES IIOIIIES Mr. Dick Phipps, Chairman June 12, 1979 Page 2 the absence thereof, I will have to institute a Legal action in District Court in order to obtain his technical removal. I also discussed with him the question of the fact that he had failed to pay the lumber bills in connection with the remodeling. I indicated that the Iowa City Airport Commission would like to see this matter paid, but it was not a matter which could legally affect the validity of his lease. I told him that I indicated to the lumber yard and to the Airport Commission that the matter of the payment of the lumber bill was directly between the lumber company and Mr. McCrabb and any actions for lien enforcement would have to be taken under the statute. You should be receiving rent payment within the next day or two, and if it is full and complete be sure and let me know. Also let me know if you do not receive payment. I do know that Mr. McCrabb has a sub- stantial number of other judgments against him and there— fore, there could be some question about his present j ability to pay the back rent. The second matter is in reference to a resolution passed by the Airport Commission prohibiting student ipilots from taking off on Runway 35 or 30 between the hours of 4:00 and 9:00 p.m. I originally received a telephone call fYorn one of the pilot instructors who advised that this is creating a very dangerous situation inasmuch as to require the students to use other runways would require them to either take -off or land cross -wind and would create a situation which would be adverse to the interests of the saf=ety of said pilots and personnel on the ground, The second contact was a letter from the Iowa State Department of Transportation, Aeronautics Division, directed to Mr. E.K. Jones, advising him that they have been advised of the resolution and they feel it fails to comply with the provisions of Chapter 328'.19 of the Code of Iowa. I subsequently discussed this matter with Mr. Jones and he reiterated the position taken by the instructor as to the danger of such matter as well as raising; the question as to air traffic control. I do feel there can be some question concerning the legality of the resolution apparently passed by the Airport Commission. It is discriminatory in that it affects solely student pilots and additionally it is regulatory im a matter MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES IIOIIIFS 1 I fi I j t { j t I s I s yll Ifff, ,i I ' i J i i , June 12, 1979;, Page 2 which is probably under the sole control of either the LMO ronautics Division of the Department of Transportation of the Federal Aviation Agency. I suggest this matter ght be reviewed by the Commission. Very truly yours, William M. Tucker 101T/k lw A FIICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES Pol""r'•a,VyM•w', DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION CENTRAL REGION 901 EAST 12TH STREET KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI 94109 June 15, 1979 MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES tg01MES Mr. C. E. Peterson, Chairman Iowa City Airport Commission Civic Center 401 E. Washington Street Iowa City, Iowa 52240 Subject: Iowa City Municipal Airport Iowa City, Iowa Student Flying Restrictions Dear Mr. Peterson: We are in receipt of a letter from Mr. E. K. Jones, Airport Manager, copy enclosed, dated May 26, 1979, advising that the Airport Commission has passed a resolution prohibiting student pilots from using Runways 30 and 35 between 4:00-9:00 p.m, daily. Enclosed is a copy of page 4, Sponsor's Assurances, of the Project Application attached to, and made a part of, a Grant Agreement -Project No. 9-13-041-0503, executed by the City of Iowa City on September 9, 1964. Under paragraph 2 of the Sponsor's Assurances, the city agreed to operate the airport for the use and benefit of the public and to keep the airport open to all types, kinds, and classes of aeronautical use without discrimin- ation between such types, kinds, and classes. The city may prohibit or limit a gdven type, kind, or class of aeronautical use of the airport if such action is necessary for safe operation of the airport, or necessary to serve the civil aviation needs of the public. ,,:;- I Bated on the information available, we are unable to determiae.that the restrictions placed on student flying are necessary for safe operation of the airport. On the contrary, we believe these restrictions would I not be feasible, creating a safety hazard due to conflicting traffic. Unless the Iowa City Airport Commission can demonstrate that such restric- tions are necessary for the reasons enunciated in paragraph 2, Sponsor's Assurances, or removes the restrictions on student flying, the city would be in violation of its agreement with the Federal Government. Request that we . be kept advised of the Authority's action in this matter. i; F MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES tg01MES z A copy of this letter is being furnished Mr. I,.K. Jones, Airport Manager. Sincerely, X10H JON$B"� Cb ef, rograms'Branch ` Enclosure �I 1 i 4. i! I ! I i i ill. '.. li ii ,l i I� n ( I I� I ! f MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES r•. BEST DOCUMENT AVAILABLE r ttr•i. IIn t)fvt tllt.,t /Ofi5l1l,.AfYC,i.S I:1 wdIr I„ f11rni::h I],1. :la:11r;olres rrgnirod I,,v the Act :oai Regulalions the ruvcmn(s ail l ^.retie will) IIIc United Sltit1:¢, ;is follows: I. 'I'Ir.•,o t•:n•en:11Its A I a I I 1n•ruuu• effective it pun acreplalice by the SII(o r of 1111 olli•r til Ped1.ral aid fur the I'ro•je(•L or any portion lhereol'. made by Lilo FAA, :owl shall ronAlitntr a pian ni the llrutl Agrcetturnl thus formed. Thew cuvun;uus shall remain in full Fort -v and eil't•rl Ihroophnot the 11.41.1'111 life ol,dw I'acilitios developed undrr this I'n,irrt. 11111 in anv eveal 11ot In rxrccd twvnly (°O) years from the date of said arcvIll- auro III, :(It olfer of Federal aid 1'or tht• Project. ?. Tliv Sponsor will uper:ue the Airport as such for the use nod henefll of the puhlir. In furt11ernnco of this roven:ntl. (hull withoutlimning its general appliva• bility and 1,11,v t), the Spn11sor sprrificolly agrees Ihat it will keep the Airport open to all types, lands, and classes Lit' ueroanulicatl use without discrimination betwern such toper., kinds, and classes: /'rucided,'1'lint the Sponsor may establish such L•1ir, equal, :nut not un,jttstly discriminatory conditions to he met by all users of the Air- port it.,; may he necessary fur the side ;tad offk•ient. operation of the Airport: And Provided Farther, That lite Sponsor may prohibit or limit any given type, kind, or class of avronntlicai use of the Airport if sn(:h action is aocessar for the safe oper- ation of the airport or neves:-11y In serve the. civil aviation needs of the public. 3. The Sponsor will out. grant or permit any exclusive right for the use of the air- parl forhiddrn i,y Soction :108 of the lTedpral Aviation Act. of 1958, and will otherwise: comply v:irh ::11 applirnble laws. In furtherance of this covenant (hut without limit- ing its general applicability and effect.), the Sponsor specifically agrees that., unless ant ],prized I, %. (he administt'atnr, it will not, either directly or indirectly, grant or per- mit any parson, firut, or corporation the excausive right for the conduct of ally aero- nautical aotivities on the Airport, including but not limited to, charter flights, pilot training, airrral'1. rc•utal and sightseeing, aerial photogrnphy, crop dusting, aerial adver- t iniug and so: VP. •iug, air carrier operations, aircraft solos and services. sale of aviation petrulemn prodncls whether or nut cond111-lod in coujonction with other aerommlticul Liclivil;,, re•p tir and nminten:uo•a of aircraft, sale of ltirct,-lft parts, and Lilly other acLivi- t ics which her;nlse of I heir dire, t relal.ionship to the operation of aircrnft can l>r regarded os Ml ncr011:111tic(d activity: 1'ruridcrl, That the prohibition against the grant or permit of an esdusitr rigid asset forth herein in no %tray alters the rights or obligations of the Sponsor under a surplus property instrument of transfer pursuant to which surplus property wilts conveyed to the Sponsor by the. United Slates pursuant to the SurlAs -Promripy Irl of /944, (5) Shrl. 678), a.1. untended. 4. Thr Spam;or agrees that it will operate lin, Airport for the use and benefit of I he pid,lic, an fair and rc:isonohle terms, uui wilhoul unjust discrimination. In furtheranre [if' this ruernnnl (11111 without limiting ils general applicability and effect)• the Sponsor specific:dly covenaols and agrees: a. 1'11:11 in its operal ion and the operation oflnll f,rilities on I he airport, neither it nor :111Y person or orgaminlion urrnpyittg spare Lir facilities (hereon will disrrim- imne ngoin•'.t tiny pet:.on or dans of parsons by reason of race, color, creed. Lir na- liom-1 ori ;; 1 in I he 11re of :n.v of the I'acililies im-m-Mcd I'or the public on the Airport. h. '1 11a1 in ally :lgrrrna•nt, roulrnr•t, It,:tse, or other arnugemonl under which It ri;:rtl or pricib•ge til til,• Airport is granted Io any person, firm, or carp:,r,llinn Ill condor to Ihr ;whlir ;tn}• ser•irc (including the fnrnishiup; or MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 1101tiES CITY OF 10 IVIG 0 -BIER 410E W SI IINGTUSI W/1 C IOWA CITY IOWA. 52240 (31913,54 or n May 26, 1979 Mr. William Sasser, Chief Airport Division Federal Aviation Agency, Central Division 601 East 12th Street Kansas City, Missouri Dear Mr.. Sasser: The Iowa Ci.ty Airport Commission passed at their meeting May 24, 1979; the following resolution 600 V G10 I move that the ICC vote to prohibit all status licenses from Laking off on runway 3pilots with student hours of 4:00 and 9:00 I seven days a week. Landing on 17 Policy would b i and 12 would be permitted ed 5 and 30 between the I all pilots during this period. This review by the Air_come to June 1, 1979 and be subject to rport Commission at its September 1979 regular meeting.-- As eeting,^As Airport Manager I wish to s Potential safety tress such a restriction creates a ha;_ard. Not only the possibilit collision, but mid-air Collis- y of intersection ons also. The only way proper and safe spacing could be accomplished would be with a control tower. It is di.ffir_tl.it enough at a non -controlled airport to enforce the .:Iandard left hand traffic pattern and mak use Lhe favored runway. e certain all traffic Thr_ track record of student pilots is excellent at this airport. 7 have b'on the Airon onlL two of this airport the past 19 years and there n0 Property damaged; y gine failures; no one was injured; 9 d; and the aircraft were slightly damaged. These restrictions not only create a safety hazard, but also discriminate against the student pilot, who can only fly during the hours of restriction. To be very frank withou I can see no airport to onforre r y way Cor the Manager of this P fixed ase a restriction except those aircraft owned aga.instlthe lowners, btheirOperator tand that would be discriminating jl f lur the foregoing reasons I urge you to review the Commissi.on's / :c!•lon:: and to Lake the necessary action to eliminate the Commission's Sincere l ; y, r_ �- / S'e's � ir A.i.rrort• 'Manager MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPI DS -DES IIOIIIES BARKER, BARKER, CRUISE & KENNEDY LAWYERS FNAR1-r5 A. BARXF.R 311 IOWA AVENUE . P.O. BON 2000 N scnri BARKER IOWA CITY, IOWA JOHN O. CRUISE 52240 AREA CODE 010 WCHAFI. W KrNNFBY TELEPHONE 351.5181 June 27, 1979 i Mr.. R. D. Phipps . 14 South Linn Street Iowa City, Iowa 52240 i Re: McCrabb Manufacturing - Airport Lease I Dear Dick: I . I am writing to you in your position as Chairman of the Airport Commission. I have been retained by McCrabb Manufacturing to represent them in connection with the matter of the assignment of their lease to a portion of the hangar building at the Iowa City airport. I have been in touch with Dill Tucker. Dill tells me that he sees three objections to the assignment of the lease. 1. Unpaid rent. 2. Failure to repair or replace the roof, 3. Unpaid bills. I would appreciate an opportunity to discuss mattur wiL-h you informally or with the Commission on a formal or informal basis. My'client has celled checks for the last given me can - the has been inadvertently overpaid. The roof was thatrepairedt at the time my client took possession of the premises. My client's position is that the payment of bills incurred incident to the remodeling of the premises is not a proper i and sufficient basis for the Commission to withhold its consent to the assignment of the lease to a reputable party. I would appreciate a telephone call from you letting me know the date of the next meeting. I went to the Civic Center at 7:30 P.M. on the 21st and my best interpretation of the notice posted on the bulletin board is that there is another meeting on the 28th. Very tr„uiy yours, RSD/jp Scott Iffarker cc: Mr. James McCrabb MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 140111ES I RESOLUTION NO. 79-290 RESOLUTION OF APPROVAL OF CLASS "C" BEER PERMIT APPLICATION BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF IOWA CITY IOWA, that a Class "C" Beer Permit Application is hereby approved for the following named person or persons at the following described locations: Voss Petroleum Co., Inc. dba Discount Dan's Shell, 933 South Clinton i ` Said approval shall be subject to any conditions or restrictions hereafter imposed by ordinance or state law. The City Clerk shall cause a recommendation for approval to be endorsed upon the application and forward the same together with the license fee, surety bond,and all other information or documents required to the Iowa Beer and Liquor Control Department. It was moved by deProsse and seconded by Balmer that the Resolution as read be adopted, and upon rol ca there were: ' Balmer AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: x I deProsse X i Erdahl x Neuhauser x f Perret x I � c Roberts x Vevera x Passed and approved this 3rd day of July 19 79 JI � J; Mayor E I i Attest: q—erk �City I � I , 1356 I i i I ; MICRornnED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 110111ES I I Y RESOLUTION NO. 79-291 RESOLUTION OF APPROVAL OF CLASS C Beer SUNDAY PERMIT APPLICATION BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF IOWA CITY, IOWA, that a Class C Beer Sunday Permit application is hereby approved for the followingnamed the following described location: or persons at i Voss Petroleum Co., Inc. dba Discount Dan's Shell, 933 South Clinton s 5 Said approval shall be subject to any conditions or restrictions hereafter imposed by ordinance of state law. The City Clerk shall cause a recommendation for approval to be endorsed upon the application and forward the same together with the license fee, bond, and all other information or docu— ments required to the Iowa Beer and Liquor Control Department. It was moved by deProsse and seconded by Balmer that the Resolution as read be adopted, and upon roll call there were: AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: Balmer x I deProsse x Erdahl x i i Neuhauser x Perret x iRoberts x Vevera x Passed and approved this 3rd day of July 19 79 Mayo Attest: ��� �P City Clerk i MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES 1357 RESOLUTION NO. 79-292 RESOLUTION TO ISSUE CIGARETTE PERMITS WHEREAS, the following firms and persons have made appli- cation and paid the mulct tax required by law for the sale of cigarettes and cigarette papers; therefore, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF IOWA CITY, IOWA, that the applications be granted and the City Clerk be and he/she is hereby directed to issue a permit to the following named persons and firms to sell cigarette papers and cigarettes: See Attached List #80-88 through #80-98 It was moved by deProsse and seconded by Balmer that the Resolution as read be adopted, and upon roll call there were: AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: Balmer x deProsse X Erdahl X Neuhauser X Perret X Roberts X I Vevera X Passed and approved this 3rd day of July 19 79 r Mayor Attest: L• City Clerk 35? MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 1101tIES CIGARETTE PERMITS - July 1, 1979 through June 30, 1980 (Continued) 80-51 - Discount Dan's Shell, 933 South Clinton (Voss Petroleum Co., Inc.) 80-52 - Iowa Memorial Union (University of Iowa) 80-53 - Finkbine Golf Course (University of Iowa) 80-54 - The Vine Tavern, 529 S. Gilbert (Jay E. Rarick and Terry G. O'Brien) 80-55 - Foxhead Tavern, 402 E. Market St. (David L. Alberhasky) 80-56 - Whiteway Super Market, 212 S. Clinton St. (McRo, Inc.) Annex, n9 80-58 - Randall MiniPricedFoods, 1851 LLower The Annex, Road (Randall Stores, Inc.) 80-59 - John's Grocery, Inc., 401 E. Market St. 80-60 - Hilltop Tavern, 1100 North Dodge St. (Edna Eldeen) 80-61 - Drug Fair #9, 121 E. Washington St. (Drug Fair, Inc.) 80-62 - Imperial Refineries Corporation, 1854 South Riverside Dr. (Imperial Refineries Corp.) 80-63 - Dividend Bonded Gas, 302 South Dubuque Street, (George Ferdic) 80-64 - Watt's Food Market, 1603 Muscatine Ave. (Dale E. Watt) 80-65 - Applegate's Landing, 1411 S. Gilbert St. (Regal Vending) 80-66 - Big 10 D -X Service, 513 S. Riverside Dr. (Regal Vending) 80-68 - Hal s&eDeeC2 S s, 800S.DubuquerSt. (Regal aVending) 9) 80-69 - Knights of Columbus, 328 E. Washington St. (Regal Vending) 80-70 - Sycamore Eating & Drinking Co., Mall Shopping Center (Regal Vending) 80-71 - Ken's Pizza, 1950 Lower Muscatine Road (Regal Vending) 80-72 - American Legion Post 17, 3016 American Legion Road (Regal Vending) 80-73 - Club Car Lounge, 122 Wright St. (Regal Vending) 80-74 - That Deli -That Bar, 325 E. Market St. (Regal Vending) 80-75 - Leroy Weekes V.F.W. Post 3949, 609 Highway 6 Bypass (Regal Vending) 80-76 - Senor P 8 80-77 - Copper Dollar,2111 Iowa Ave. (Regal Vendinal g) 80-78 - Ken's Hardware, Highway 1 West (Regal Vending) 80-79 - Lamplighter I1, 1310 Highland Court (Regal Vending) 0 80-81 - Grand sDaddyts,150541E.gBurlingght St. ton9St. al V(Regal)Vending) 80-82 - Holiday Stationstore #92, Hwy. 6 & Rocky Shore Dr. (Cedar Falls Oil Co.) 80-83 - Pearson's Drug Store, Inc., 202 N. Linn St. (Pearson's Drug Store, Inc.) 80-84 - B.P.O. Elks, 637 Foster Road ( B.P.O. Elks #590) 80-85 - Riverside 66 Service, 1031 South Riverside Dr. (Paul Christian) 80-86 - 1st Ave. Kerr-McGee, 2229 Muscatine Ave. (Don -Jay Service, Inc.) 80-87 - Deadwood, 6 South Dubuque (James L. Strabala and Dorothy A.Strabala) I" 80-88 - Applegate's Landing, 1411 S. Gilbert St. (Hawkeye Amusement) 80-89 - Maxwell's, 121 E. College (Great American Saloon Co.) 80-90 - H. P. Smith Co., 2000 Industrial Park Rd. (Canteen Food & Vending Service) 80-91 - K -Mart Store No. 4315, 901 Hollywood Blvd (Canteen Food & Vending Service) I' 80-92 - Owens Brush Co., Lower Muscatine Rd. (Canteen Food & Vending Service) 80-93 - Moore's Business Forms, South Riverside Dr. (Canteen Food & Vending Service) 80-94 - American College Testing Program, Inc., Hw. 1 & Interstate 80 (Canteen Food & Vending Service) �! 80-95 - Loyal Order of Moose, Iowa City Lodge No. 1096 (2910 Muscatine Ave.) 80-96 - Hamburg Inn No. 2, 214 N. Linn (David J. Panther) 80-97 - Needs, Inc., 18 S. Clinton 80-98 - Burger Palace, 121 Iowa Ave. (Stasi, Inc.) MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS.DES NOMES , 3 ( RESOLUTION NO. 79-293 RESOLUTION SETTING PUBLIC HEARING ON PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, FORM OF CONTRACT, AND ESTIMATE OF COST FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OR for Ramo 8 Block 64 Downtown Parking Facility DIRECTING CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH NOTICE OF SAID HEARING, AND DIRECT- ING CITY ENGINEER TO PLACE SAID PLANS, ETC., ON FILE FOR PUBLIC INSPECTION. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF IOWA CITY, IOWA: 1. That a public hearing on the plans, specifications, form of contract, and estimate of cost for the construction of the above-named project is to be held on the 17tfday of,I'L I y , 19x2 -, at 7-30 PM in the Council Chambers, Civic Center, Iowa City, Iowa. 2. That the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to publish notice of the public hearing for the construction of the above-named project in a newspaper published at least once weekly and having a general circulation in the city, not less than four (4) nor more than twenty (20) days before said hearing. 3. That the plans, specifications, form of contract, and estimate of cost for the construction of the above-named project are hereby ordered placed on file by the City Engineer in the office of the City Clerk for public inspection. It was moved by deProsse and seconded by Balmer that the Resolution as read be adopted, and upon roll call there were: AYES: x x 9 NAYS: ABSENT: x Passed and approved this BALMER OEPROSSE ERDAHL NEUHAUSER PERRET ROBERTS VEVERA 3rd day of July 1979 Mayor ATTEST:014'aCity Clerk -tom Reeelved A Approved By The Legal DepaA of s �-Zy- X91359 MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 1101BES L. Petition for Suspension or Remission of Taxes on Account of Age or Infirmity ' To THE nonan of SUPERVISORS or_...........J......oh...nso..n ..............................................................COUNTY, Iowa: , The undersigned respectfully represents that, by reason of age or infirmity She is unable to con - (Ane OR INFIRMITY) tribute to the public revenue; that .S he is the owner of the following described property upon which .S.hC asks that the taxes for the current year be.......suspended .,under the provisions of Chapter 28J, Acts. (susrrNnED ou nelu•rn:n) of the Thirty-ninth General assembly, to -wit: REAL PROPERTY (Give Currecl legal description) the west half of lot 4,• and all .of.lot ,.5•,..all.,.in.•bloc.k... Z.,...Ea.s.t.......................... IowaCitY.................................................................................................................................................................. ..................................................................................................................................................................................................... ................................................................................................................................................................................................:...... .. lj PERSONAL PROPERTY I ...........p............................................................4................... ................................................................................0.................... X...p�?�................ ..................... •••• Petitioner. Iowa, Subscribed and sworn to before me aL.............IOWa City .................................. uus..........27th dI: of ... June ..................................... 1 ......................................... Notary Public)i)(• QbJfillAYMNaK,u Johnson ......•..Cowtly, lows. f i - COMMISSION I E1IA1 Int and for..........hn......................... M'fCOMMIS510ME%NRES Sepltmber30,1980 APPROVAL 6 Abbie Stolfus ......•.....•••.......... Clerk of the ...... Ci.t nf....Iowa...Ci.t • � (CITY, T•owx ors Towusulr) I � Of_ .... ............... 0 .................. 4 ..... .. . in the County or ........ d.ohns.nn............ ................................ State of Iowa, hereby 1 certify that at a meeting of the...._Couneil.....................of said ...... .G.7.Cy... Of. .,1.0wd... CJ.ky............................. ............ ' i (COUNCIL Olt THUSTEF_S) (CITY, 'TOWN on TOWNSHIP) 1 held on the...... 3rd.......... day of ....... July_ .................................................. 19.7.9.., the within and foregoing petition j; tuns dtlly considered and.... approved - - ..... .... •• under the provisions of Chapter 281, Acts of the Thirty. (APraovrn Olt utsAPPROM) ninth Ocueral Assembly. ......... .............1.o19a...G.I.tY................... ......... Iowa, ................. July ... ............ ............. ,1919... Cit v lmh Clerk. xua��c�w BEST `. )/, DOCUMENT �12 � 6 .t. AVAILABLE Abbie StoCity C erk, CMC t' MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOIRES - INFORMAT,.oN FOR APPLICATION FOR SUSPENSICa OF TAXES. Name: 0>df%C- 4 Address: dO �i Yd Avo,Vr/�— Age: 2 Occupation: 4-J /.YOGI% Martial Status: ou! Dependents: "Vo Ncr' Monthly Income: Earned: .............. $ I ' Private Pension: ..... $ I11 Government Pension: ., $ /fe/ V0 r ! i TOTAL ................ $ /S %, ya i i Market Value of House per Iowa City Assessor: $ �' / oao t i t 1 f Have Taxes been suspended previous ears? ended iY AM/q,&6 Sw�r /q,&6 I i � ! I Is applicant disabled? /✓a III I Status of General Health: Good? si I Poor? Bad? ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WHICH APPLICANT FEELS ENTITLES HIM TO SUSPENSION: 6AI yr S0inc S�cuc.ry 1 �� ,r [dew✓i�.Ts, 7,r�/ /91 I;moo S/ter!° �2cr,2� �� fJ✓oc.r�v.— Lvovco Br uv2 44r /9ivy Gd //diC �aPCh/Jrrs. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES FIOPIES d JI 1� Y; I t ,I 1 i MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES FIOPIES June 28, 1979 Iowa City Council Civic Center Iowa City, Iowa 52240 Gentlemen: rjo 0 UN2 9 1979 ABBIE STOLFUS Cm CLERK On behalf of many of the black students and community members of the University of Iowa campus, I would like to express our sincere appreciation for your immediate concern and response to our requests for actions in regard to the discriminatory practices of the Woodfield's disco. I believe I speak for all when I say that we realize the magnitude of the situation and recognize the procedures which the City Council must follow before formal action can take place.. Consequently, the time and energy that you have already put into this matter is very much appreciated. Since no one benefits as long as there are citizens who would attempt to deprivate the constitutionally protected rights of others, I know that the City Council will act with the greatest of speed to ensure that this situation is rectified as soon, and as fairly, as is humanly Possible. I would also like to point out to the City Council that at no time has any student, to my knowledge, sought legal representation. As a collective body we have, thus far, decided to pursue our administrative remedies, leaving any Judicial remedies for such time as may be appropriate. I point this out only to say that the actions of Ms. Jane Ikleberry and Ms. Claire Olsen were done without knowledge or condonment of the black students on campus. Although many of their expressed beliefs and concerns are shared by the student population, I must formally repudiate the following actions of these attorneys: I. that they were placed in a position of having to speak for a group whose voice would otherwise have not been heard; 2. that they don't believe the City Council is adequately prepared or willing to deal with the situation; and 3. that it is necessary for us to parade/pickett the Woodfield's establishment. In regard to a voice for the students; most black students on campus will assure you that, although we may be ignorant as to who 1361 MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES ■ ' Page 2 in the city we can approach for remedies of problems, we have enough black leaders on campus who are able to help in this situation. In particular the staff of Special Support Services under the direction of Ms. Colleen Jones have always and hope- fully will continue to be a valuable resource in what student rights are. Second, as far as most students are concerned, although we would prefer to have immediate action, we realize if we are to achieve our ultimate goals - the assurance that this type of discriminatory practice won't occur again --there is a certain protocol which must be followed. We appreciate all of your answers as to what we can do, and the honesty with which the Council gave these answers. We know that everything that can be done, is being done and know we are being fairly dealt with by Council members. Last, although many of us would love to make a public display, i.e., picketting the Woodfield's establishment, because of the tremendous pressure and news coverage surrounding this incident, we do not believe that this approach would be beneficial to our cause. In fact, most of us believe that it may prove fatal to our cause. To wit, a public display would only bring about a confrontation between the involved parties. This could lead to an even greater strain on the racial situation. We are not looking to create many of the problems which have already arisen in the south. i As a designated student leader and having a personal interest in what happens in this case, I felt it was my duty to inform you of the student feelings at this time and to clear up any possible ambiguities in this matter. I know I speak for all when I say thank you for your time and consideration and we hope you can complete your investigation as soon as possible. i Sincerely, Z Marilyn Turner MT/rb I MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES IIOIMES 1361 July 12, 1979 Ms. Marilyn Turner, Manager Afro-American Cultural Center The University of Iowa 303 Melrose Avenue Iowa City, Iowa 52240 Dear Ms. Turner: At its regular meeting of July 3, 1979, the City Council received and placed on file your letter concerning the alleged discriminatory practices of Woodfield's disco. Thank you for informing the Council and staff of the students' feelings in this matter, and your support of the City staff Is certainly appreciated. The City staff is indeed pursuing this matter and,as you may know, a public hearing has been set for Tuesday, July 24, at 7:30 P.M. in the Council Chambers. Sincerely yours, Neal G. Berlin City Manager cc: City Clerk is MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES IIOIRES Tot The Iowa City Council Ret 1750 Rochester A Planned Area Development celled 1750 Rochester is before the Iowa City Council on Tuesday, July 3rd, 1979. The PAD request was recommended for denial by the Planning and Zoning Commission, therefore a 75% majority vote by the Council will be required to approve the PAD. Plum Grove Acres, Inc. initially presented this PAD in 1975, since that time, in the development of adjacent tracts, Plum Grove Acres' function hes been to provide access to other property, to try to provide perk area for the City and to provide storm water storage. I The time has coma to provide some housing on Plum Grove Acres land. The B% interest rete existing at the time of submittal — 1975 — is now 11+]%. The people that i lend money for these projects have disappeared. The cost of preparing plena and getting to the City Council has been substantial. Since Plum Grove Acres, Inc. has stated in 1975 that they would complete such e project . . . Plum Grove Acres, Inc. restates its position in 1979. "If the City of Iowa City sees any advantage in this Planned Area Development and gives approval for the project, then Plum Grove Acres, Inc. will complete the project." The City Council is requested to make its decision on the benefits that this Planned Area Development will convey to the City of Iowa City. Sincerely yours, PLUM QBLRVE ACRES INC. 2 6W',4L/%6Acypwc-e, uce R. Glaeoow. Presid t Frank Boyd, Vice Presid nt 136 MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 110111ES 1750 Rochester — History 1975 in may of 1975 Plum Grove Acres Inc. the owner of two acres of land on Rochester Road petitioned the City of Iowa City for a Planned Area Development of approximately 14 units. Two units were. to be fronting Rochester Road and the remaining units were to be placed on both sides of an existing creek to the North. The question of the future extension of Seventh Avenue delayed e decision on this PAD for several years. During that time Plum Grove Acres began negotiation with the owners of land to the North. An option price was agreed upon and purchase was planned. Then the Iowa City Park Board asked Plum Grove Acres Inc, to allow them to purchase the property for park uses. Plum Grove Acres Inc. agreed to step aside and allow the City to acquire the property. 1976 Subsequently, while the City was pondering over the purchase price and hiring experts to inform them that the price Plum Grove Acres agreed to pay was too high — another Developer stepped in and purchased the property. 1977 In order to insure the proper growth of Iowa City, Plum Grove Acres deeded to the City of Iowa City one—half acre of land to be used for the future extension of Seventh Avenue into a new sub— division celled Windsor Heights Part 5. In order to comply with a new ordinance, Storm Water Detention Ponds, Plum Grove Acres Inc. agreed to a placement of the Windsor Heights Addition stormweter pond in the creek area of 1750 Rochester. The agreement called for the necessary storm water storage capacity for 1750 Rochester to be placed at the bottom of the pond. This resulted in the lose of another one—half acre of 1750 Rochester property. 1978 h 1979 The new and improved 1750 Rochester PAD was submitted to the City during 1978 and 1979. .The concensus of the City Staff and the Planning h Zoning Commission was that a road should be put thru from the dedicated Seventh Avenue easterly to connect with e possible future extension of Windsor Court. This would mean another } acre out of 1750 Rochester. Plum Grove Acres countered with an offer to deed to the City a strip of lend off the North side of the Storm Water Detention Pond 50' in width, when and if Windsor Court is to be extended. Plum Grove Acres Inc. does not intend to pave this strip or provide any improvements. The lend will be available to the City when and if needed and the future developer would have to re—engineer the pond and construct the required im— provements. This is whore 1750 Rochester is today. Plum Grove Acres Inc. insisted that the Planning and Zoning Commission make a decision on this Planned Area Development after four and one—half years. Plum Grove Acres Inc. knew that it would be a negative decision, however, this was the only way they could get the project before the Council for action. It is interesting to note that at the time that Plum Grove Acres resubmitted its lest PAD another developer submitted a PAD for lend to the west of 1750 Rochester on 6/10th of an acre and that RAO was approved. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOINES r-- JORM CEDAR RI r If land is used If land is sold for Advantages of PAD to City as a PAD individual use i Number of unite of 13 7 5 extra unite of housing Housing produced without any extra sewer, water or street maintenance Number of Driveways none two Extra traffic safety on Rochester Road Number of Driveways four five Extra traffic safety on Seventh Avenue Beautification of Planned Area Can- Individual effort Beautification of entrance in - ares and maintenance tinuous Maintenance to a new sub -division Pleesingj of pond by a Home- appearance Uniformity j owners Association Tres Preservation Trees Remain No control of trees Preservation of mature Ever - Rochester Road green Trees an Rochester Tree Planting on Per Ordinance plus Existing trees are More trees, especially around Seventh Avenue more adequate pond E i future Extension of Available to City City Will have to nego- Substanstial.Savings to City Windsor Court when and if desired tiate with property owner "if and when" at no coat at that time and pay the price Land Use Dwellings as stated No Covenants any use Control in the PAD allowed in RIB r-- JORM CEDAR RI 4� I 1 i 1. i r � I I I" l I I� I I� 1 1 f 1 1; G ', I City of Iowa Ch MEMORANDUM DATE: June 26, 1979 TO: City Council (` FROM: Don Schmeiser, Senior Plann't,rl RE: "1750 Rochester" � Per the Council's request, this packet includes all Staff Reports previously submitted regarding the application 111750 Rochester". It is being included for your information. DS/ssw Attachments MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MINES 13400 �i !j I f City of Iowa Ch MEMORANDUM DATE: June 26, 1979 TO: City Council (` FROM: Don Schmeiser, Senior Plann't,rl RE: "1750 Rochester" � Per the Council's request, this packet includes all Staff Reports previously submitted regarding the application 111750 Rochester". It is being included for your information. DS/ssw Attachments MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MINES 13400 L, M STAFF REPORT To: Planning and Zoning Commission Prepared by: Doug Boothroy Item: S-7505. 1750 Rochester (PAD) Date: January 5, 1978 A supplement to Staff Report (9/20/77) ANALYSIS The subject Planned Area Development plan proposes a development of single-family, duplex and fourplex units on a two (2) acre tract situated within an existing single- family neighborhood. If the Commission chooses to change the land use in this neigh- borhood by approving this plan, the staff considers it very important that the archi- tectural styles of the proposed units appear to be single-family residential as to blend in with the surrounding uses, e.g. mirror image designed duplex units should be avoided. It is the Staff's opinion that the architectural styles as proposed are not acceptable and should be modified or redesigned to reflect the comments expressed above. Provisions for the extension of Windsor Court should be made with the development of this tract. Although the extension of Seventh Avenue into this area provides a secondary means of access to the existing additions of Windsor Heights via Windsor Drive the street grades of Windsor Drive and Woodridge Avenue are so steep that the problems presented by these grades to traffic circulation during snowy and icy conditions will not be completely alleviated by access to 7th Avenue from Winston Drive. The extension of Windsor Court would alleviate the aforementioned problem and encourage the use of the 7th Avenue/Rochester Avenue intersection. This intersection is a better alternative to the Windsor Drive/Rochester Avenue intersection due to the street grade of 7th Avenue being much less difficult and the increased sight clearance afforded to both pedestrian and, vehicular traffic. The Staff (both Planning and Engineering) would not feel comfortable with any type of proposed development in this area that did not propose to allow for the extension of Windsor Court. RECOMMENDATION The Staff recommends that the PAD be denied unless revised to resolve the constraints discussed above and incorporating the deficiences and discrepancies listed below. DEFICIENCIES AND DISCREPANCIES 1. The typical street and sidewalk cross-section for 7th Avenue should be corrected to illustrate a 28 foot back of curb to back of curb sireet. 2. Windsor Court should be continued through the subdivision so that it can eventually connect with the existing Windsor Court. 3. The location of the sanitary sewer at water service connections should be shown. 4. The storm water detention basins should be clearly outlined (the overflow eleva- tion contour line should be noted) on the plat and a note that no structures are to be allowed within the detention basin. 5. Fire hydrants should be shown, and located at the corner of 7th Avenue and Roch- ester Avenue and the corner of 7th Avenue and the private drive. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES G. 'rhe size of existing and proposed water main should he shown. 7. The plan does not comply with the provisions of the Tree Planting Ordinance. ATTACHMENTS Location map ACCOMPANIMENT Preliminary PAD Building design plans Approved by Pa_4 Paul Glaves, for Dennis R. Kraft, Director Dept. of Community Development MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MO RIES ra STAFF REPORT To: Planning and Zoning Commission Item: S-7505. 111750" Rochester GENERAL INFORMATION Applicant: Requested action: Location: Size: Existing land use and zoning: Surrounding land use and zoning: Applicable regulations: 45 -day limitation period: SPECIAL INFORMATION Public utilities: Public services: Transportation: Physical characteristics: Prepared by: Doug Boothroy Date: October 20, 1977 Plum Grove Acres, Inc. 601 South Gilbert Street Iowa City, Iowa 52240 Preliminary Planned Area Development plan approval to develop 14 single family, two-family and multi -family dwelling units. North of Rochester Avenue and east of Seventh Avenue Two acres Undeveloped and RIB North - undeveloped and RIB, East - undeveloped and RIB, South - single family and RIB West - undeveloped, park land and RIB Subdivision Code and the Storm Water Management Ordinance waived Adequate sewer and water services are available. Sanitation service is available as well as police and fire protection. Vehicular access is proposed from Seventh Avenue The topography is gently to moderately sloping (2-0 percent). ANALYSIS The applicant is requesting a modification of the permitted land uses of his property through the PAD provisions in the Zoning Ordinance in lieu of a request for rezoning. Before the subject plan can be approved by the Commission, it must meet the intent of the PAD Ordinance (i.e., provide a creative and innovative MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES G-ki -2- site design not feasible under the existing zone) and not be contrary to the public interest (i.e., public interest being defined as the interest of owners and occupants of neighboring land). The plan provides so little of the required information that the Staff cannot make a thorough analysis and recommendation as to the plan's desirability. The Staff does feel that if a variation in land use is appropriate, every attempt should be made to design the PAD to be in harmony g neighbor- hood. RECOMMENDATION No recommendation. DEFICIENCIES AND DISCREPANCIES 1. All existing and proposed storm sewers, sanitary sewers, water and gas mains, etc. should be shown along with their respective easements. 2. Across -section of drives and parking is needed showing locations, type of curb and gutter, the paving and sidewalks to be installed. 3. Locations and widths, other dimensions of proposed drives, parking, etc. should be provided. 4. Sketches should be provided to indicate the general design of building types and the overall character of the development (the front elevations of units should also be included). 5. The plan does not comply with the Storm Water Management Ordinance. 6. The plan does not comply with the Tree Planting Ordinance. 7. A note should be included that no structure is to be allowed within the storm water detention basin. 8. A location map should be provided on the plat. 9. Distances should be shown between proposed buildings and structures on the tract and existing buildings and structures on land located adjacent to said tract. 10. Rochester Road should be renamed Rochester Avenue. 11. The duplex proposed to be located in the northeast corner of the PAD is situated in the detention basin and will have to be removed. 12. The schedule of completion should be provided. 13. The area of any proposed open space, private or common, should be provided. 14. 'Boundaries of the proposoi PAD should be fully dimensioned. 15. An LSRD plan will need to be submitted. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES -;_ 16. There may be additional deficiencies and discrepancies after requested infor- mation is submitted. COMENT The Parks and Recreation Commission has reviewed the subject plan and has no objection to development in its relationship to Hickory Hill Park. There are, however, concerns about the potential erosion which could occur below the storm water detention basin's outflow structure and it is recommended that precautionary measures be taken to preclude this problem from occurring. ATTACHMENT Location map ACCOMPANIMENT Preliminary plat Approved by: Dennis R. Kraft, Director Dept, of Community Development MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES i 1 I �I I ll I i I 1' I I f -;_ 16. There may be additional deficiencies and discrepancies after requested infor- mation is submitted. COMENT The Parks and Recreation Commission has reviewed the subject plan and has no objection to development in its relationship to Hickory Hill Park. There are, however, concerns about the potential erosion which could occur below the storm water detention basin's outflow structure and it is recommended that precautionary measures be taken to preclude this problem from occurring. ATTACHMENT Location map ACCOMPANIMENT Preliminary plat Approved by: Dennis R. Kraft, Director Dept, of Community Development MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES 00 SUBJECT: of fickory Hill Park; date 5/1/75; 45 -day limitation: STAFF REPORT Planning and Zoning Commission June 12, 1975 S-7505. Preliminary Planned Area Development plan of "1750 Rochester" located north of Rochester Avenue and east filed: 4/21/75; deferred by Psz: waived. PURPOSE: The purpose of this report is to analyze the various elements affected by the and to submit recommendations to assist theoposed Commissionlent inmestablishing directives that will enable the developer to complete the plan in accordance with the City's aspirations concerning: 1. future residential and arterial street patterns in the vicinity of the proposed development, and 2. development adjacent to Hickory Hill Park. STAFF The subject development of ANALYSIS: five duplex and two triplex multi -family apartment buildings on 2.3 acres of land proposed by Plum Grove Acres, Inc. is located within the northeast quadrant of Iowa City generally described as that area enclosed by Highway 1 and Scott Boulevard on the north, Scott Boulevard on the east, Rochester Avenue on the south, and the one-way couple of North Dodge and North Governor Streets on the west. These definitive streets, encompassing an area of over two square miles most of which is presently undeveloped, are the only thoroughfares which provide access to east Iowa City from Highway 1. As the process of urbanization continues, there will unquestionably be a need for a north -south major arterial street that will provide direct access via the extension north of Rochester Avenue of either of the arterial streets, First Avenue or Seventh Avenue. Although First Avenue, an illustrated in the City's comprehensive plan prepared by Harland Bartholomew and Associates in 1962, is a more likely candidate to most adequately accomplish this purpose, the extension of Seventh Avenue, which would have an effect upon the development of the subject proposal, should not be ruled out until the advantages and disadvantages have been considered. The present 60 -foot wide pedestrian access strip into Hickory Hill Park opposite the termination of Seventh Avenue at Rochester Avenue was reportedly acquired by the City for the secondary purpose of extending Seventh Avenue northerly MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CLDAR RAPIDS -DCS fI0111E5 -2- i should it be deemed necessary. However, the standard for arterial street right-of-way width, according to the Sub- division Code, is required to be 80 feet. A four lane, 45 -foot wide paved surface would hardly leave enough space back of curb for sidewalk and utility installations. The situation is further complicated by an embankment adjacent to the single family residence on the east which would require the construction of a retaining wall at an expense to adjacent properties disregarding the visual damage to the resident's property after excavation. Alternatively, more land can be acquired to move the street westerly, but by observation of recorded subdivision plats, the centerline of Seventh Avenue south of Rochester Avenue is already approxi- mately nine feet east of the center of the 60 -foot wide parcel The northerly extension of Seventh Avenue to connect with Highway 1 must follow a course through the rugged terrain of Hickory Hill Park. The -Commission at their regular meeting on May 8th requested comments from the Parks and Recreation Commission relative to the extension of Seventh Avenue into Hickory Hill Park. It was their consensus that "a road would have no benefit to Hickory Hill Park and it was felt that a road built through the park would destroy the natural character of the park as well as the already landscaped entrance". The sizable cost of the construction of a major arterial street is partly offset by a developer's contribution to 28 feet of an oversized street width within a subdivision or by special assessment to adjoining property within 300 feet of up to 25 percent of the value of the property for the street construction. Much of the land along its extremity is presently owned by the City in park land which would require the City to pay for a greater proportionate share of the cost. In view of the analysis above, it would appear that the dis- advantages of the extension of Seventh Avenue far outweigh any advantages,favoring the more appropriate extension of First Avenue. The extension of First Avenue over less severe topographical conditions would be nearly spaced equally between the north -south arterial streets Scott Boulevard and the one-way couple of North Dodge and North Governor Streets and have the practical advantage of providing a physical boundary between two prospective neighborhoods of desirable geographic extent in the northeast quadrant. Located within close proximity to the east of the subject tract are the additions of Windsor Heights. The 58 -lot residential area is presently served by one access which is to Rochester Avenue although three streets within the area MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MONIES -3 - have been "stubbed out", two to the west and one to the north, to permit future access through presently undeveloped areas directly or indirectly to existing streets and future street connections. Since the one access to Windsor Heights has steep grades of up to 12 percent, a secondary means of access to Rochester Avenue should be provided to enable residents to get out during snowy and icy conditions. The developer has requested that the Commission give favorable consideration to extending Seventh Avenue northerly to eventually tie in with Winston Drive in Windsor Heights and permit the proposed development access to a street other than Rochester Avenue. The staff cannot foresee any particular advantages to extending Seventh Avenue northerly as a residential street over alternative connections through the subject property or the adjacent partially undeveloped property to the east except for slightly better topographical conditions, and in light of the many associated problems aforementioned and the anticipated turning movements on Rochester Avenue, a connection to Rochester Avenue opposite or 120 feet offset from Rochester Court may well be more appropriate. The staff would suggest that a street connection be provided through the subject property similar to the suggested attached street plan. The second concern of the City is the development which takes place adjacent to Hickory Hill Park. The Commission on May 8th also requested comments from the Park and Recreation Commission regarding proposed development adjacent thereto. The Commission responded with the request that "when considering any proposed development adjacent to Hickory Hill Park, a maximal effort be made to conserve and sustain the present natural complexion of the landscape by the preservation of existing terrain and plant life and the addition of new protective landscaping". The Park and Recreation Commission had no particular objections to the proposed development and was in favor of Planned Area Development as a means of requiring the sustenance of the existing natural vegetation as opposed to conventional single lot residential developments. STAFF It is the staff's recommen- RECOMMENDATION: dation that no action be taken on the preliminary PAD plan but that the applicant be given an indication of the Commission's desires relative to future streets and associated concerns. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAP IDS -DES 10RIES I U I iv IOWA WT. IOWA N7AD � J v 7f1►N41�OD ;I InturiT. inwAs June 3, 1975 Dr. Robert Ogesen Chairperson, Planning and Zoning Commission 305 Woodridge Iowa City, IA 52240 Re: Proposed Development in 1700 Block of Rochester Avenue Dear Mr. Madsen: With regard to the above subject matter, the Park and Recreation Commission made two recommendations at its May 28, 1975, meeting as per the request via Don Schmeiser's May 14, 1975, letter. The recommendations read as follows: 1. It was moved by Davis and seconded by Mascher that the Park and Recreation Commission recommend to the Planning and Zoning Commission that 7th Avenue not be extended north of Rochester Avenue. Unanimous. 2. Powell then moved and Mascher seconded that the Park and Recreation Commission recommend to the Planning and Zoning Commission that, when considering any proposed development adjacent to Hickory Hill Park, a maximal effort be made to conserve and sustain the present natural complexion of the landscape by the preservation of existing terrain and plant life and the addition of -new protective landscaping. Unan- imous. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, i :� / `/ Sarah Fox Chairperson, Park and Recreation Commission SP:ef 9 MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS.DES IIOIMES I Park and Recreation Coma -.Bion Page 3 May 28, 1975 Assuming that the City Manager agrees that the property at Keokuk and Highland not be sold, there was a concensus that there should be a media release regarding the possible use of the property as a mini -park. Gene Chubb was asked to contact Julie Zelenka regarding publicity. r Hauber indicated she would send a memo to Berlin regarding her role in any Planting at the Keokuk and Highland site. Fox then requested that Staff forward copies of the Hollywood Manor state- ment on neighborhood parks to the new members of COmmission. The possibility of' obtaining a walking access to Hickory Hill Park from Reno Park was discussed, as per Commission's 1971 recommendation. Staff was asked to pursue any leads regarding the sale of land in the Reno Park area and Showalter and Kelley were asked to talk with a Mrs. Turner re- garding access to Hickory Hill Park through her property. Don Schmeiser presented a proposal from the developer of the proposed Plum Grove Acres regarding the establishment of 16 townhouse dwellings off of Rochester ferredto the nPark nand dRecreation jacent to HCommiesionickory lbyathe planningpandrk. ThproosalZoninge Commission because of the developer's desire to have a road built.in the area as an extension of 7th Avenue from Rochester Avenue through Hickory Hill Park. The Planning and Zoning Commission requested the Park and Recreation Commission's reactions to the proposed road and to the develop- ment of duplexes and three-plexes adjacent to the park (sea attached letter from Don Schmeiser, May 14, 1975). There was a concensus of Commission that • road would have no benefit to Hickory Hi11.Yark and it was felt that a road built through the park would j destroy the natural character of the park.as well as the already landscaped entrance. Commission re-emphasised its a wilderness park, ss commitment to Hickory Hill Park + Following further discussion, it was moved by Davis and seconded by Mascher that the Park and Recreation Commission recommend to the Planning and Zoning Commission that 7th Avenue not be extended north of Rochester Avenue. s Unanimous. a Powell then moved and Mascher seconded that the Park and Recreation Com- mission recommend to the Planning and Zoning Commission that, when con- sldering any proposed development adjacent to Hickory Hill Park, a maximal effort be made to conserve and sustain the present natural complexion of the landscape by the preservation of existing terrain and plant life and r the addition of new protective landscaping. Unanimous, I -a,,aerer reported that there was a public meeting regarding Project GREEN s proposal to re -design College Green Park for a Bi -Centennial Project on May 21. He reported that, neighborhood representatives indicated .that they would prefer little or no change in the park and that, rather then create problems within the neighborhood, Project GREEN withdrew :heir recent ._l3b ).. FIICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 110IIIES MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS-DES MOVIES M ORDINANCE NO. 79-2960 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTIONS 8.10.35.1 AND 8.10.35.12A.2 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES BY ADDING PROVISIONS FOR COMMON SIGNAGE. SECTION I. PURPOSE. The purpose of this Ordinance is to allow common signage for uses in the M1, M2 and ORP Zones in addition to individual facia signs and to provide definitions for measuring sign area. SECTION II. AMENDMENT. A. Section 8.10.35.1 is hereby amended by adding the following definitions: C.1 BUILDING FRONTAGE. The horizontal length of the front wall of a building. L.1. FRONT WALL. The wall of a building upon which a sign is mounted including elements of the wall or any member or group of members which defines the exterior boundaries of the side of the building on which the sign is mounted and which has a slope of 60 degrees or 'greater with the horizontal plane. The area of the front wall is the building frontage times the building height. Where a building contains two or more uses, the front wall of a building as used herein shall apply as if each use were contained in a separate building. B. Section 8.10.35.12A2 is hereby amended as follows: In the event that five (5) or more uses or buildings are contiguous and individual facia signs as listed below in Section B.l.a. are erected, a common major sign of the type permitted in Section B.l.b. or B.l.c. may be permitted provided, however, that the following conditions are met. a. The area of the common sign shall not exceed 175 square feet. b. The area of the common sign shall be deducted from the total maximum permitted sign area for all of the individual facia signs, and MICROFILMED BY JORM MICnO`P o CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES 1343 Ord. #79-2960 Page 2 C. The area of the common sign shall be deducted an equal amount from the maximum permitted sign area for each individual facia sign. SECTION III. REPEALER. That Section 8.10.35.12A.2 and all ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with this ordinance are hereby repealed. SECTION IV. SEVERABILITY. If any section, provision or part of the Ordinance shall be adjudged to be invalid or unconstitutional, such adjudication shall not affect the validity of the Ordinance as a whole or any section, provision or part thereof not adjudged invalid or unconstitutional. SECTION V. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall be in effect after its fl nal passage, approval and publication as required by law. Passed and approved this 3rd day of July, 1979. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY CLER I i i I' MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES F1011JES 0 k, Ord. #79-2960 It was moved by Neuhauser Page 3that the Ordinance as read be adopted and dupon oroll call there— were AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: �- BALMER x -- dePROSSE x x ERDAHL x NEUHAUSER x PERRET x -- ROBERTS VEVERA First consideration 6/26/79 Vote for passage: yes: eu auser, erret, Roberts, Vevera, Balmer. Nays: none. Absent: deProsse, Erdahl. Movea by deProsse, seconded by Balmer, that the rule requir- ing ordinances to be considered and voted on for passage at two Council meetings prior to the meeting at which it is to be finally passed be suspended, the second consideration and vote be waived, and the ordinance be voted upon for final passage at this time. Ayes: deProsse, Neuhauser, Perret, Roberts, Vevera, Balmer. Nays: none. Absent: Erdahl. Date of publication _July 11, 1979 MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MO RIES F City of Iowa C14 ' MEMORANDUM Date: June 29, 1979 To: City�uncil From: City nager Re: Proposed Bus Fares Since the last Council meeting the Transit Manager has conducted an extensive investigation in an attempt to determine the impact of any fare increase on the City's bus system. This memo summarizes his findings. Regarding the effect of a fare increase on patronage, the old Simpson -Curtin formula is no longer valid. This formula predicted that for every ten percent increase in fares, ridership would drop three to five percent. The consensus in the industry today is that fare increases may slow systemwide patronage growth, but they no longer result in absolute decreases. In this day of escalating gasoline prices, however, the effect of a fare increase is almost negligible. In fact, the most recent small -city fare increase found (Norfolk, Va., January 1, 1979), resulted in ridership increases of 3% over the previous month, 19% over the same month a year earlier, and is averaging 9h% during the six subsequent months. Regarding the impact of increased fares on our FY80 State Transit Assistance grant, both the State DOT and the City taxpayers would benefit. The reduction in operating deficit would be shared by the City and State in the same proportion that they provide support. In our case, the City has budgeted $309,440 and the State has allocated $177,932, so for every dollar saved, we would return 36.54 and keep 63.54. Conversations with both the Director and Area Manager of IDOT's Public Transit Division have confirmed that they would support a fare increase that is used to provide additional transit service. The following scenarios outline the Transit Manager's best estimate of the impact of several fare structures, assuming that the system expands to 14 routes as presented at last week's Council meeting. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES X3(5 r r r iP•-d )rr-f.S'i r .4ry'K .^iMb'v Y:1nlu%b%1(NJn M✓.!1,nn� (13; i�^ st My}pi IL''Gfi rr Ky 4,1 Y � }�..� t :.\,C r� ( dr:•i'a .J yl:^ .a.. l�Ri4ww/FP*.r�+n.xs.nr f MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES 1101MES TO three systems serve you: 1 f q MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOIIIES J CAMS - Fr to anyone who wishes to ride. Phone 353.8 CORA LLE ents. Free transfers to Iowa City . Ph -7711. 10 ants. Free transfers to Coralville r buss s -6336. f d All Iowa Ci Coralville fares are paid when passengers board the as. sin gers are encouraged to have correct change to d Iowa City buses and Coralville passengers us have co change. lobs City and Coralville b at each into e n to load and unload E passengers. niversity of lowa�ambuses stop at { points that are ed with Cambus si ns Po g �jgpossible to reach easy walking distance of almost any poln�lowa City and Coralville and on the Universityof Iowa caml g the three transit systems in greater Iowa City. The trans r point for all three systems is at Clinton and Washington Streets in the downtown business district. �i ` Children under the age of five may ride tree in both Iowa City IE and Coralville. i rj. I �t �t dw MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOIIIES J Phone Numbers for other types of transportation: Super Cab, In 51-0380 Yellow Che r Cab Co., Inc. 337-3131 Airport I- usine Service to Cedar Rapids Airport 337- ' 7174 uses Union Bus Depot 337-2127 Iowa City was the first state capital of Iowa, from 1846 to 1857. The original capitol building is now owned by the University of Iowa and was restored to its original condition for the 1976 Bicentennial Celebration. It is a national h istorica I landmark. Population - Iowa City 47,744 Johnson County - 75,025 (both special census of 1974) MAIN DOWNTOWN BUS STOPS Washington St. U 1 U OF IOWA CAMBUS SERVICE ; Clockwise( Route) RANCHER Counter -CI wise (Blue Route) Hawkeye uta Aller 8:30 Interdor Kpress Route Between E end West Side dormitories Oakdale to Penlecr•st c All bus o re marked with C bu s w je iE • P t D i STUDENT S 1 • BI on L / IHEALTH I I I , MEMORIAL UNION r et I • FrorAt �.• D SLOG UNIV. HOSPITAL I i OAKDAii.— _ _ •, CAMPUS �_ —J r� PENTACRES lows Aro. Lff roe • "' ire IIAWKEYE MAIN CAMPUS MAIN I •�'�^� • ❑ •S • COURT „r LIBRARY S IIAWKEYE E ❑ •. � APiS FIELD HOUSE MARK IV APTS - I � �,. •,. 1 - ti��••••• � STADIUM w�r...��� S•• 0 1 2 3 4 5 Im AIR0 QER •IfpALfFFH FJII W WBUWE9T Jr * ENL Sp ROWlvltlE CORALVFILLE * ' EN1U0. E AVO < < •A �qq i T\ HAYWOOD OR. < w? ♦ CORALVILLE * E II IH ST *p I >= FST INDUSTRIAL ♦ �'Ft. a H PARK IF `�9 WO 00 C I F CHA �0. < i W FOSTER RO. LL O 04 i O p j 1F AAAA,a o a(P S R OR a �♦t >♦ G M AIFilm* FAIRCHILD ST * �� '�' T T w J� O YEFO WAY W W< to 0 p SAO (ERRE i < f i W rt AiILL i 71H k t ki - m 21ST AVE - IOWA City w / 00. STREET DIRECTORY 11 DR tVEf. K ' • ' R? C Yf '�A ALPINE CT _..G•10 DR G-9 K !7M S SDA p0. .tib 1 1 vr a r,{ip. };1•t:JV{:y :\f, :'- i'^•,:f:: ALPINE .... AMBER AN. J-0 Y O ! T OAiKAr' E.LYfi:. ••' 2 �1 AMERICAN lEG10N RO iV ]d.Vlll15 %:{�'i=l•. ,�:},D, KIM% AMHUAST ST GIE9` H w - 7 ::: ;<�:J:{, • GOULD •i%,=!':i D1,;: •. F AA BOB CIR ARIDA DR G•10 ` f < - ': ••::ip; ' AIBURY DR .G.H.ZKR n :.iFl;jir:: ARIZONA AVE 11 * - r RK RD. ARTHUR Si G.H•9 GILBERT G. Il WN ASH . H-7 H-7 GILIERT 5 GILIERT ST. �W` `' 3 < G ASHLEY DRIVE ASHWOOO 04 BAKER St E-7 H-9 GILMORE CT. GINTER AVE.._..146-7 * C it M LFAt ST. x < W MI HALLEY > < A BANCROFT 0R BANGOR Cl.H 66 7 GLEASON AVE 1.7 GLEASON DR b7 VR. yJ♦ x x 0 < c x BARTELT AD G0 GIENCRESi .. FI EB \♦ `+ Op W O 0 - C S IAYAAD Si ..E:1 GLENDALE CI R = A , IREFORD CT BEECH Si M9 G-10 GLENDALE C7 EF7 GLENDALE AD E] ` A IELDON AVE CA IEA F 8 F 'h IELU VISTA . ...D -S GlENOAIE GLENN DA. i - \ U O 0 _X ENTON CI -G-6S G•7 GIENVIfW AVE �Q\ 0 f IENRON ST ST. W. G41 GOIRvIEw AVF 7 S..,a A.` •� jB AR f ROH, J',PA IEN70N .... 5T..P7" GOVERNOR SI. N. C 6 4 F 1= u Y' p u IUCKHAWK 5PRINGS CI. E -I G, j TUCK ,I INGION SEE 46 10LOAAY ST .. vA 1OWLING GREEN Eq...-........�-.:. ♦ \ 1 14ADFOR0 DA H.8 G. _ a tR } BRADLEY BRIGHTON D AVE .H•9 STODA BC eeeLLL ? •ti, 1 fjP- I N�* OADL 6 IINADWAY ST _H.E� E. I f •,nA `*'fF \ ••�7 OWA AV . ` EyJ HOWLAND g. IROOKLAND FK. DA. BROOKSIDE PL... DA.... -1 G-9 G-7 1 w Y 7Y O A MOOKHDE DR, BROWN BROWN SI,•.. ...._.. NdJ p5 6 i Z t• D9 .. .0.9 IA L L DESA\ STADIUM PARK c le ! �'"'• RUENA TUR FSH AVE ,BURLINGTON ST 16 Foe w r G OY ,lel III'I�-Iljl•' 1 kE: .�,.,,,y (URNS AVE BYINGTON RD CAPITOL N I69 F-1 EG -1 1Aiy\ 1 LBpSSt. P! 01, F� CALIFORNIA AVE.. 11,x,-,_ _ CALVIN AVE ..G I'- .-... �•' - E' . CAROLINETAVE. CAROLINE DR.. ASR GtR CIR b..:i IIS l E COUNTY R ""� n R-Vy, y, C) 0 0 0 RIS N SI' CARRIAGE HILL CAR40lt S1 G G ^.� _ s AIj7 L,.e s, i°5.,?" U G w � RIVEASID CARVER SI GH- CE. a K ND CEDAR _ CENTER AVE ..EI G 0L. jR#*QgAB%z R RATE T E0.0G 0.D. RK CT. EN }I It Cf CENTER Sl. D E & WEST 0.01E W V/ U C LVRr o o` NIA p0.. BV,N CO MYRTLE AVE. AIG 7 CHURCH St. D -S6 0 0.0• 'I AVE: ; y •^ _ RIVEASI CLAPP ST... CLARK Cf........ .. E6 F 6 HIGH 'YAD ti AVE. T W T- r S. CLARK SL EGA GRANADA CL C .I tl 0 0. 0 ��� t FA IE S CLINTON S7... CLOVER ST...... OGS FG 9 GRAND AVE. F24 GRAND AVE. Cf... F9 E3 ,�y, y l w LSI N i G !D ST _ < J4WW COLLEGE CL COLLEGE CL PL. F) F-7 GRAND AVE. S... FO 71 GRANT CT. FJ ,. < LD _ U z O N COLLEGE ST.. F4.7 GRAM SL FG7 'r PA SMAHAS 7 L ION Si. Y D COLORADO 0AVE. E-9 GKASLOW UR. DA. �. H�I rS YYI��"�O j f^ G 8; CONCORD CR. E9 GREENWOOD DR.. GI <L4 I 0 Iwl OA OAKNOLL DR. DOUGLAS STs u1 CONKLIN Sl... CORNETT AVE.. _C/ F 1 GAEN MTN. DR. E9 GAISSEL FL. ICS r -•+ne •vv^.•' V A11U u V 0 CO"O0N H6 GROVE SL 04 - U O DID ST. COOONST St 144 F69 GUILDFORD CI, 119 MARINA CR.. HI 0 I < 1 COURT COUNT Si PL ..F•1 HAFOR DR. H-1 Get, T PF i Z E D CREIGHTON St 1-9 HALLEY Sr. DR D l0 IN I o CRESCENT HA HAALOCKE SI G2 fro CRESTVIEW FI HARRISON ST R, p Y R WAROWAY 1 D CRESTWOOD CI FI .FIS HASTINGS AVE E[¢¢9 1� !HOPPING CEN7EA CROSBY VEN10A1 St . 1.7 . HAWTHORN - EJ Ci. If RAWGO IVAAER[ DAVIS SI 16 CT. HEINZ RD. J9 LUCON HAF00. DR Fd OINLIN Sf E ID L Cf. R ERNEST S nw•' DARTMOUTH St OURIOAN SI F -II FGJ HIGH fJ LUCAS HIGHLAND AVE. HSJ LUCAS ST N D G 1 OLIVE CI T S OLIVE SET. �6) ,.y.(L.cD1 �I7 if AL 1 �So y DE FOREST H-67 HIGHLAND Cf .. HS IUKIRK ..G6 ST .H�1 OLYMPIC N _ Sf DENBIGH D4 DERWIN DA H 4 G4 L•D5 HIGHLAND DR G1-7 LUSKOACHMO HIGHWOOD DJ MACIIIDE HILLSIDE DR.OD IF MADISON ST. Si. 1D GI 0710 SI ... N E.Gi PAGER .. PARK G 1 EI GS7 p0. IF r ENS SY d DDEWEYIANA C DIANA CT. DIANA. HS G$ HOLLYWOOD MAGOWA BLT HdJJ MAGOWAN SI G{ PLC .. DEI PARK PLACE 1.) H5 Cpl �O a E DOLL St. E-7 HOLE AVE.. D1 MAHASKA CI ..G1 PAR AO ... .CD4 4r O SI CI H07Z AVE... F6 MAHASKA PAIK ST ..D 1 S L. i i DODGE DODGE Si II .DGS DOS HOWELL MAIDENAYE. . H S .FHS PARSVIEW .E-7 DODGES S AVE.G6 HUDSON AVMAIR NSST.. AVE HE PARSONS ST.. .E7 DOUGLAS CT. 34 G34 E) BE) MALL DR. H1 PEARL St .... _F6 DOVER ST ST DOVER SI INDUSTRIAL N IOWA GH IOWA AIAL PR. R0. J9 MANOR AVE. MAPLE DR. CD.1 PENFRI DA F.A PENN DR H.I RONALD$ SL - DGI / OOWNfY Nb & JACKSON AVE Gd MARLEW000 G7 CIA. LA. G 910 PENN CIA ._ E4 ROOSEVELT ST, A., G{ IOWA CI NIC P LAI PORT •L DUIUOUE RD, C6J JEFFERSON 51. E47 MARCY ST Hd PICKARD SL., H6 AOWUND LL RUNDELL SI. Ed FG. TOWER L1. G3 DUBUQUE Sl, N. DUNLAP CL DG 5 FI JESSUP CIA. FG I MARIETTA JOHNSON ST. H. OGS MARKET AVE.. Gd PINE Sl. EIS PINECAESI RT,.. HJ GA RUSSELL DR. .I.) TRACY U. .IAO DURHAM CL H 9 JUNIPER DA. G 10 MAYFIELD RD. .FI PLEASANT SL E6 SAMUEL DR. 11 TRIANGLE PL F7 Ell UStM00A OR C D4 KATHLIN D.,Gd MCLEAN ST. D I PLUM ST, H S6 SAND LAKE DR. H I H-1$ TUDOR DA, 1ULANE AVE. El EASTWOOD OR. ALE DR G9 KfI1WOOD OR, F9 MEADOW SL F 4 POST RD FI,F POTOMACPR EB SAND RD. F B t UNION ED. I1 REA E ELIZABETH SI.. . AA�S p KEOKUK St. H A MELROSE Cl.f DV CHEIN SCOTT BLVD. ..FID G UNION VALLEYDAYE. E 1 ELMIITUGE AVE. { I KIMBALL AVE. G6 MELROSE N. FJ PREMISS St. . E.4.5 SHAMROCK DR. O VAN BUREN SI.N. DG -S / IOWA ELSTON AVE. EMERALD SI. CRL7 GI KIMIALL 40. CD56 MEML[R KIN ETON GREEN H-7 MIAMI Cl. bl PRINCETON Cf. DR. I I PAINCEION RD.. ES SHERIDAN AVE. E.B SHIAD ER AD. GAJ Fd VAT! BURIN ST. S. 6.5 ERNEST ST. H-1 KIAKWOOD AVE, G56 MICHAEL Gd PAOSPEC7 At. FO SOL IHGAtE AVE. 15 VARSITY 1175.._ AVE. . F1 1.1 BUS R ESSEX ST. ESTHER St. H9 HA KIAKW000 CI. G1 MILIEI KIRKWOOD CT. G 6 MONROE AVE. G1 RADCLIFF AVE. SL • G�) RAVEN CA. FIT SOUTH LAWN DR. L61D SPRING Si. GI G 7 VENT❑❑RA ... VILLAGE GREEN HID ESTION St. EUCLID AVE. G-1 H-6 KN011W00D OR. 11 MONIIOSf KOSER AVE. MOANINGSIDE AVE. F1 RAVEN ST. DL If RAVENCRES7 04, F-9 SPRUCE Cf. FLIT, SPRUCE S7. H7 H I BLVD. ._ VILLAGE RD.. H A 10 ASI B FVANS SL E 6 .FAR LAFAYETTE ST. H 6 MOSS . OJ A At LN. A I $IANRp RD ROE. F9 VIRGINIA OR. I S 6 WHEATON RD .... Gf�I 1 Sf. .._ ....F.7 GHB CCE FAIRCHILD Sf. FAIR MEADOWS FId LAKESIDE DP. JB Mott LAKEVIEW DR G4 MT. VERNON SL E{ RENO St Ci. 1 RICHARD$ SL DER St EVENS DA. Elq Si. ANN D7.. H-4 1 { WADE St. WHITING AVE WAKE FOREST AVE. E-10 WHITING AVE C7 DST• G-1 IEEE West Ben BLVD 11 LAURA 01. 14 Mf. YHNON DR. E I RIDe SI.. EO SL [CEMENTS SL CA WALES ST. _,. F4 WILLIAM ST GHS E ST.GTE G56 OR. FST. G7.1 TAIRVIEW AV(. ,FJ LAUREL SI. 166 MULLIN AVE. . 02 RIDGELAND AVE. BEA ff.MAItHIASALLEYC{ WALNUT ST. WILLIS ..Dd ,.. FERNDALE AD. REASON AVE. Fd DE) LEAMER Cf. F1 MUSCATIN[ LIE SL O�E7 lvf. RIDGE AD, LGlI RIOGf SL JCI$ StREI Si - M 6 SUMMIT 51 G-0 AGJ WARWICK CIP WASHINGTON PK. H9 WILSON ST..FJ HSI. ... OFS WILLOW Sf IF I SL N•L/ Rocheste FlOAHICE FOREST GLEN G 6 1 LEKINGION AVE. DE MY or f AVE.. GJJ RIOGEVIEW AVE. G I SUMMIT SI N. SUNSET S7 C•O{ F-G'I A0. WASHINGTON P . WINDSOR Cf ..E7 J ST. ._. H 1 WINDSOR 0R. EJ 1St AIF. T FOSTER RD. 3 11 LINCOLN AVt. EJ NEVADA LINDEN CT. NEWTON AVE AIR RIDGEWAY OR RD. E.IH RIDGEWOOD U ..... E4 1.5 SWEET BRIAR AVE... F9 WASHINGTON ST. _F4 ....FH 0.69 WINSTON OR. . E7 ISI ST ..,..,.. G•S FRANKLIN GHJ _..F.9 LINDEN AD.. . $9 NORMANDY DR. C D1 RIVER ST. ... D.E4.1 SYCAMORE St. . HI WATERFRONT DA. 15.1 WOODLAWN ..E6 IND AVE. ...._F.H'1 EJ Es HawkeyD RINDAVE. H6J LINN SL .........D.GS NORTH ST. DI AIVfR510ECL _. F/ UFIS/EEDWAY CdS WAYNEAVE... ....H19 WOOOAIOGEAVE.. 7NO ST .__. NS FRONT 1110 St. FG -0.10 LINN Si, S .. .G H -S NORWOOD CI AS gIYEASIOE C7. S....G 4 TALWAN Cf Gd WEBSTER ST. .. . GS WOODSIDE ON...... GJ )RD AVE..,. F.11 1 FRONT TSL F) IOVISE NI pA KCRFSi G7 RIVERSIDE DR. ...GH1 tANGlEW000 ST. .../S WFEB EA St. ..GQ WOODSIDf PI Gd 14057 .... H•S LOWELL SI, FJ INAKIAND AVE f Gl RI Y((ASIDE OA. N. AT TAYLOR DA ...li WElLESIEY WAY ._F1 WOOIF AVE..PEd 9TH AVE.GH 1 Wardway G[ORGE FAA . LOWER MUSCARINE OAKLAND AVE. 11 (OSCAR, RD. G0 TEETEIS Cf . E7 WESTERN RD.. .. Id WRIGHT _ G3 SIM AVE .. f�H•/ ® GEOAGEIf•W'N CIA. E1 ID. G-171 OAKNOLL DR... Or ROCHESTER AVE.. FAS TEG OR H•I W STGAIE Cl, .G•I WYLDE GREEN 61A AVE .... GJ OBLIN DR.. G. TOWER w. BRANCH OAK MRK Cf. FG A ROCHESTER CL ...E.1 TEHRAN 10 .. . DE WESTGATE SI. G-1 R0. _... GH? )IH AVE .......EG•7 to, E1I0 OAKIIDGE AVE. .. D.1 ROCKY SHOREDR. D E.7 TERRACE AD. KG1 W STMINISTER ST. .-F-9 YEWELL SI... GH6 All AVf CT. G 7 DUBUQUE ST. LLEY WESTINGHOUSE Iowa City, Iowa, and Vicinity — E11TE1•NOWAADMHN50N 0 O O pB. SIT ANN "aelk < a h�=T, � u 'NIA DR. ST. CI. HILL PARK DR. BRANCH jr iRGETOWN CPR.3 $I o k VERNON CT. , • U [ J^I � CORALVILLE STREETS CHAMPION HILLS ST EMERSON ST FAIRCHILD ST FAIRVIEW AD HEMPHILL DR HIGH ST HILLCSEST OR HUGH$ ST SUMMIT HILLS 04 ST AVE IST ST INO AVE lNo AVE It IND ST E AVE PRD AVE PL 4TH AYE PIH ST SIH AVE STH AVE PL STH SI SIN SI PL JTN AYE CH ST NH AVE IfN SI IIH AVE ITH ST NH AVE 11H ST ICN AVE IOTH ST IISH AVE INN ST PITH AVE IIiH AVE CH AVE ILtH AVE NIH AVE NTH AVE RD. old zd POS Of. ' uhf tyQ'*f ST. O� KIM LAV �FS�n < m <FD'1'f < EMORY 0°ESS ,'S C 111 C7. -'ii► E G OM[ItCFR':v� i C C < t AEDENS 50`��gB. W < J . Z L ; Z \ KIMBALL S 1 •`n d V AMERICAN LEGION RD. T F D fto, II I.e. v. U 3 $IJOSEPH S 9 Z CEMETERY ST. CI. HILL PARK DR. BRANCH jr iRGETOWN CPR.3 $I o k VERNON CT. , • U [ J^I � CORALVILLE STREETS CHAMPION HILLS ST EMERSON ST FAIRCHILD ST FAIRVIEW AD HEMPHILL DR HIGH ST HILLCSEST OR HUGH$ ST SUMMIT HILLS 04 ST AVE IST ST INO AVE lNo AVE It IND ST E AVE PRD AVE PL 4TH AYE PIH ST SIH AVE STH AVE PL STH SI SIN SI PL JTN AYE CH ST NH AVE IfN SI IIH AVE ITH ST NH AVE 11H ST ICN AVE IOTH ST IISH AVE INN ST PITH AVE IIiH AVE CH AVE ILtH AVE NIH AVE NTH AVE RD. n QREATER SANDUSKY LFALON w G AVE. 3 / IOWA CITY �* / BUS ROUTES "F° B v DR. Z 1 1 ' 7L 3 j LAKESIGE I � West Benton — Lakeside tommEEREA Manville Heights - E. College , H:. mEEEERERe Rochester — Mall mmmmmmm� North Dodge — Towncrest i < N s ® Hawkeye Apts. — N. Dubuque �*,.* 1st Ave. Coralville x i a mv+ Wardway — Goodwill IRa ISS Lantern Park & 10th St. Ga Dotted -line routes are special trips. Consult Schedules. old zd POS Of. ' uhf tyQ'*f ST. . —__-I EAsrw� d <, ��, o Y �FS�n m <FD'1'f < EMORY 0°ESS ,'S C 111 C7. -'ii► E G OM[ItCFR':v� 0 h C < t AEDENS 50`��gB. 00 A. PI/Y�R Ie_ 0001 J . STREETS AND ROADS L ; Z \ < r < GST. S 1 •`n d V AMERICAN LEGION RD. T F D fto, II I.e. v. U o H S- 40 c •N'A u..o / tD n QREATER SANDUSKY LFALON w G AVE. 3 / IOWA CITY �* / BUS ROUTES "F° B v DR. Z 1 1 ' 7L 3 j LAKESIGE I � West Benton — Lakeside tommEEREA Manville Heights - E. College , H:. mEEEERERe Rochester — Mall mmmmmmm� North Dodge — Towncrest i < N s ® Hawkeye Apts. — N. Dubuque �*,.* 1st Ave. Coralville x i a mv+ Wardway — Goodwill IRa ISS Lantern Park & 10th St. Ga Dotted -line routes are special trips. Consult Schedules. old ;;;\'�'l.'•;•:�+�: y{ERCP' PARKVIEW A :A E G OM[ItCFR':v� LEGEND STREETS AND ROADS \=•' STATE HIGHWAYS / /D HCLfRq i U.S. HIGHWAYS C r / k qK Y Pgar `` D �•°,' INTIR5 WAY RA LIOADS CEMETERIES p° PARK& 1 • WATERWAYS POINTS OF INT116ST SCHOOLS •LL.LK.� i 7, i9 77 g 9 10 roPl.uM 1PTn. 1w. nlr numnrr a 0mm.rc. A o�anr .n..UHiv n. ;_MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB 1 FARE = 256 • CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA i 2 Passengers (assuming a 10% increase over FY79) = 1,900,000 Revenue (assuming an average fare of 22.54) _ $ 427,500 Budgeted Operating Expenses = $ 889,345 Cost of Proposed Additional Bus Service = 76,720 Total Operating Costs = $ 966,065 Farebox Revenue = $ 427,500 Misc. Revenue = 1,732 Federal Revenue Sharing = 309,440 Total Revenue From Local Sources = $ 738,672 State Operating Assistance = $ 177,932 Total Resources Available $ 916,604 Unbudgeted Deficit = $966,065 - $916,604 = $ 49,461 Funds Available From FY78 State Reimbursement = $ 69,609 The City Manager recommends that this State reimbursement be allocated to the General Fund to reimburse the General Fund for transit expenses assumed by the General Fund in FY78 which should have been paid for out of the IDOT grant. FARE = 304 Passengers (assuming a 5% increase over FY79) = 1,825,000 Revenue (assuming an average fare of 274) _ $ 492,750 Revenue From Local Sources (including fares) _ $ 803,922 State Operating Assistance i = 177,932 Total Resources Available $ 981,854 Total Operating Costs = $ 966,065 Budget Surplus = $981,854 - $966,065 = $ 15,789 Savings Credited to State = $ 5,763 Savings Credited to City = $10,026 MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOINES I :MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB FARE = 354 • CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA 3 Passengers (assuming no increase over FY79) = 1,740,000 Revenue (assuming an average fare of 31.54) _ $ 548,100 Revenue From Local Sources (including fares) = 859,272 State Operating Assistance = 177,932 Total Resources Available = $1,037,204 Total Operating Costs = $ 966,065 Budget Surplus = $1,037,204 - $966,065 = $ 71,139 Savings Credited to State = $25,966 Savings Credited to City = $45,173 It is the opinion of the Transit Manager that bus fares should be raised to 354. Although it appears that a 304 fare would adequately finance the proposed additional service, costs continue to rise, and another request for fare increases in the next year or two is very likely. The public, faced with 404/gallon increases in gasoline, almost expects bus fares to go up; now is the time to act. In addition, for over a decade public transit has been under -priced in an attempt to retain riders. The seats are now full; perhaps the time has come to return fares to a reasonable level. The additional revenue could be used to further improve service, or if need be, could reduce the burden currently placed on the taxpayers of Iowa City. North Dodoe Route On Wednesday, June 27th, the Transit Division conducted a boarding/departure check at St. Wenceslaus Church. In the three hours around midday only one elderly person was discharged at St. Wenceslaus, and that same person and one other were picked up. Because the Wednesday Congregate Meal is better attended than either Monday or Friday, it is unlikely that other days' ridership is substantially higher. The Transit Staff also reviewed the possibility of running a bus over Davenport Street, but parking, uncontrolled intersections, and pavement conditions make this street very unattractive for bus use. Because ridership to St. Wenceslaus is so low, it is felt that the Church Street routing will improve service to far more people than it will hurt. In addition, the Church Street stop will be no more than 600' from the church, both inbound and outbound. Therefore, the Transit Manager recommends changing the North Dodge route to Gilbert and Church Streets, at least on a trail basis. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES tt0111ES N ;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA i dw A-0 .000 i �h/o/C T L7/�-dN Trti�L s.`.�/"`per �� il►q� cd�j�i i,�40 !yN' 91 Ji •�r 40Irlc,,e Ito ✓ �-- i / A`�i0� QI•P e( �G�i? �� '`yysr i spy../ /Lfas>` s/ /'�O/�/�� %1"s%P �+ C�►/� �� pr ri/ `"A/.* ""'z' ,/f0ojr• 1315 MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB i CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOVIES ,;MICROFILMED BY DORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA I 'q� _0 J ,r ee. %y 74e uri Geo„ %l,`►. %fes `yds` r���N�• /Ju%i1a%f1'P�vss4r� s! adv/oma, r�i/ir to Aw MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOLLIES ,;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA I / Jw.e aY NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON PLANS SPECIFICATIONS, FORM OF CONTRACT AND ESTIMATED COST FOR + A TRUCK WASH BUILDING i IN THE CITY OF IOWA CITY, IOWA TO ALL TAXPAYERS OF THE CITY OF IOWA CITY, IOWA, AND TO OTHER PERSONS INTERESTED: Public notice is hereby given that the City Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa, will conduct a public hearing on plans, specifications, form of contract and estimated cost for the construction of a trOck wash bjilding in said City at 7:30 o'clock gym. on the 3rd day oO July 91 79 , said meeting to be held in the Council Chambers in the Civic Center in said City. Said plans, specifications, form of contract and estimated cost are now on file in the office of the City Clerk in the Civic Center in Iowa City, Iowa, and may be inspected by any persons interested. Any persons interested may appear at said meeting of the City Council for the purpose of making objections to said plans, specifications, contract or the cost of making said improvement. This notice is given by order of the City Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa. Abbie Stolfus City Clerk of Iowa City, Iowa -- MICRJFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES M0114ES 1364 � l i I i 1 i i i i ,;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA I / Jw.e aY NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON PLANS SPECIFICATIONS, FORM OF CONTRACT AND ESTIMATED COST FOR + A TRUCK WASH BUILDING i IN THE CITY OF IOWA CITY, IOWA TO ALL TAXPAYERS OF THE CITY OF IOWA CITY, IOWA, AND TO OTHER PERSONS INTERESTED: Public notice is hereby given that the City Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa, will conduct a public hearing on plans, specifications, form of contract and estimated cost for the construction of a trOck wash bjilding in said City at 7:30 o'clock gym. on the 3rd day oO July 91 79 , said meeting to be held in the Council Chambers in the Civic Center in said City. Said plans, specifications, form of contract and estimated cost are now on file in the office of the City Clerk in the Civic Center in Iowa City, Iowa, and may be inspected by any persons interested. Any persons interested may appear at said meeting of the City Council for the purpose of making objections to said plans, specifications, contract or the cost of making said improvement. This notice is given by order of the City Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa. Abbie Stolfus City Clerk of Iowa City, Iowa -- MICRJFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES M0114ES 1364 ;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB 1 • CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA RESOLUTION NO. 79-294 RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS ESTIMATE OF COST FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF building ,- .. the +k wech ESTABLISHING AMOUNT OF BID SECURITY TO ACCOMPANY ING CITY CEEACH BID, DIRECT - PLACE FOR RECEIPT TO PUBLISH NOTICE TO BIDDERS, AND FIXING TIME AND IPT OF BIDS. WHEREAS, notice of public hearing on the plans, specifications, form of contract, and estimate of cost for the construction of the above-named Project was published as required by law, and the hearing thereon held. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF IOWA CITY, IOWA; 1. That the Plans, specifications, form of contract, and estimate of cost for the construction of the above-named project are hereby approved. 2. That the amount of bid security to accompany each bid for the construction of the above-named project shall be in the amount of 5% of the bid Treasurer, City of Iowa City, Iowa. payable to 1. Th..c the City Clerk Is hereby authorized and directed to publish notice for the receipt of bids for the construction of the above-named project in a newspaper published at least once weekly and having a general circulation in the city not less than four (4) nor more than twenty (20) days before the date established for the receipt of bids. i 4. That bids for the construction of the above-named project are to be received by the City of Iowa City, Iowa, at the Office of the City Clerk, at the Civic Center, until �g;OU A M on the the bids will be Opened 7Lth day of _ ),Iv , 19� Thereafter, thereuponthe City Enclneer referred to the Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa, Por action uPonnseid bide at its next meeting to be held et the Council Chambers, Civic Center, Iowa City, Iowa, at _.7:'i0 P M on the �-�-- 31th day of __1 I y 19_ZZ, Rerelvsd A Approved By The Legal Dapartmenl s_ 6 -2P -f9 X61 MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOIIIES 0 ;,MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA I � Page 2 Resolution No. 79-294 i It was moved by Balmer and seconded by Roberts that the Resolution as rea e3 aadopteZ, and upon roll ca -II E- ere were: AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: x BALMER X DEPROSSE x ERDAHL X NEUHAUSER x PERRET x ROBERTS j x VEVERA Passed and approved this 3rd day of OulY , 1979, I MAYOR ATTEST: k CITY CLE !!I � i i! I i I ; i 'I MICROFILMED BY M1, JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES i 11 N ;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB • CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA RESOLUTION NO. 79-295 0 RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, FORM OF CONTRACT, AND ESTIMATE OF COST FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF South Gilbert Street Improvement Project ESTABLISHING AMOUNT OF BID SECURITY TO ACCOMPANY EACH BID, DIRECT- ING CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH NOTICE TO BIDDERS, AND FIXING TIME AND PLACE FOR RECEIPT OF BIDS. WHEREAS, notice of public hearing on the plane, specifications, form of contract, and estimate of cost for the construction of the above-named project was published as required by law, and the hearing thereon held. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF IOWA CITY, IOWA: 1. That the plana, specifications, form of contract, and estimate of cost for j the construction of the above-named project are hereby approved. j 2. That the amount of bid security to accompany each bid for the construction of the above-named project shall be in the amount of $100,000, payable to Treasurer, City of Iowa City, Iowa. 1 1. That the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to publish notice for the receipt of bide for the construction of the above-named project in a newspaper published at least once weekly and having a general circulation in the city not lees than four (4) nor more than twenty (20) days before the date established for the receipt i of bids. 4. That bids for the construction of the above-named project are to be received by the Iowa Department of Transportation, at their offices in Mmes, Iowa until 9:00 A.M. on the 14th day of A„A„S+ , 19.7.9, Thereafter, the bide will be opened by the Iowa Department of Transportation , and thereupon referred to the Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa, for action upon said bide at its neat meeting to be held at the Council Chambers, Civic Center, Iowa City, Iowa, at 7:30 P.M. on the 14th day of August , 1979 . MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES tI01RES Rmfnd A Approved By The Legal Depamnent 1369 1 ;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA I Page 2 Resolution No. 79-295 ATTEST: 2&1,�LLJ CITY CLEW MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOINES It was moved by Roberts and seconded by Perret that the Resolution as rea ed -b a oc�d, and upon roll ca t ere were: AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: x BALMER x DEPROSSE x ERDAHL x NEUHAUSER x PERRET x ROBERTS x VEVERA Passed and approved this 3rd day of July 1979. , MAYOR ATTEST: 2&1,�LLJ CITY CLEW MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOINES I I --MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AIT DES MOINES, IOWA I - a0 ly 3 NEWSPAPER'S COPY (Two publications required) NOTICE TO PROPERTY OWNERS Notice is hereby given that there is now on file for public inspection in the office of the Clerk of the City of Iowa City, Iowa, a proposed Resolution of Necessity, an esti- mate of costs and plat and schedule showing the amounts pro- posed tc be assessed against each lot and the valuation thereof within the district as approved by the Council of Iowa City, Iowa, for a street improvement, designated as the 1979 Street Improvements (Tanglewood Street - Ventura Avenue), of the types and in the location as follows: (Iowa City - 1979 Street Improvements -- Tanglewood Street - Ventura Avenue) TANGLEWOOD STREET - From 259.16 feet south of Ventura Avenue to 180 feet north of Ventura Avenue. Paving to be seven (7) inch thick concrete, twenty-five (25) feet wide with integral curb. VENTURA AVENUE - From Tanglewood Street west to Dubuque Street. Paving to be seven (7) inch thick concrete, twenty-five (25) feet wide with integral curb. That the proposed district to be benefited and subject to assessment for the cost of such improvements is described as follows: (Iowa City - 1979 Street Improvements -- Tanglewood Street - Ventura Avenue) All property included within the areas described so as to include one-half of the privately owned property between each such street improved and the next street, whether such privately owned property abuts upon the improved street or not. In no case shall property situated more than 300 feet from the improved street be assessed. The Council will meet at 7:30 o'clock_ pyM., on the 3rd day of July , 1979, at the Council Chambers in t e Civic Center, Iowa City, Iowa, at which time the owners of property subject to assessment for the proposed improve- AHLERS. COONEY. DORWEI"R. HAYNIE & $MITA. LAWYERS, DCS MOINES, IOWA MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOVIES 1370 1 ,MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA 1 ments, or any other person having an interest in the matter may appear and be heard for or against the making of the improvement, the boundaries of the district, the cost, the assessment against any lot, tract or parcel of land, or the final adoption of a Resolution of Necessity. A property owner will be deemed to have waived all objections unless at the time of Hearing he has filed objections with the Clerk. This Notice is given by authority of the Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa. £, z Clerk of Iowa Ci y, Iowa (END OF NOTICE) AHLCRS. COONCY. DORWCILCR. HAYN ICA SM ITN. LAWYERS. DCS MOINES. IOWA MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES HOMES 1370 i I rd -'MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB • CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA city or Iowa Cr VII r. - 1� _I � !QV, . . ► -1 Date: November 3, 1978 To: File From: Gene Dietz, City Engineer Re: Tanglewood/Ventura Special Assessment On November 2, 1978, at 7:30 P.M. this writer and Frank Farmer held a meeting concerning tNe special assessment process for Tanglewood/Ven- tura. Approximately 11 people turned out for the meeting which repre- sented 9 property owners. With the exception of two people, the resi- dents at the meeting were either non -committal or for the project. Attached for reference is a list of those persons attending the meeting. Most people were interested in details of the project, not voicing any particular concern regarding the cost or the amount of the assessment for each parcel. Evelyn Jensen indicated that she would not be in favor of the project. Her primary concern was that they already had frontage on Old Dubuque Road and that no particular benefit would accrue to their property. The other primary objector to the project was Daniel Berg. Mr. Berg owns three homes in the subdivision. He indicated his primery reason for not wanting the special assessment is that he preferred the "atmosphere" and the looks of the existing gravel roads. Among other items discussed at the meeting, the following items should be addressed: 1. Several citizens were concerned about existing water main and whether or not it had to be lowered. Frank Farmer will check into this situation; 2. The residents expressed concern that a "No Outlet" sign be erected so that people did not become lost on entering the subdivision; 3. Brief discussion centered on the method of access to the subdivision during the actual construction of the project. Upon learning the facts, the majority of the people in attendance believed that they would prefer no special efforts be made to gain access to Tanglewood. Rather than raise the price of the project, they would prefer to walk from Old Dubuque Road; and 4. A family named McCoy is in the process of building a new home next to the Gospel Meeting Room. Mr. McCoy indicated that no drive approach had been provided for their home on the proposed plans. I informed him that we would certainly provide a drive approach for the lot. Frank Farmer will deal with this matter. cc: Frank Farmer MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES lIo IMEs 1376 U f j J i i j u j; r ;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB 1 a • CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA Name .Y AJ,4k r -r %P���c No, /SS Z 7'3,"5/ `; L 'PIC C7 ye 07 C C� s is Al [ �nl •'�[ IJ. s110W Kee/f7 No s4v., W o ON IF op P:'wre� MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MONIES 1-c i -10r 1 v.0 /Xl'J ;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA I `I MICROFILMED BY j JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES ROIIIES 31 ri t^ '..MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA I 1 ' •J1111f I Ilk ma.ar I .I �i �. ISI N LI e Iluutr i alar I 1�� 7I 1f- it-- r II `I j)y f INnr r N.d' i I I (� Mr A I Ild r11L 1.. 111 rr.RC �1 u>m'Y '/I 1LL(Cf I' dCNC dOY ! ( 11l ' Ilii ,1j II }'.r• C gwiY L�.r. 1..11 Ii ( 11 i !II lII�.I.. I i I i I 1 ; '. ISI NN "✓'. I 1I I i:!I Ilil�l,l�r � I .jl�:a19r..er •n.. I _ I N N ■�) LOW[R FLOOR,...�+� MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAR CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES H i i i I I I i I i l I i i i I i i � j y i I ,MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA I MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 110111[5 i i I li I i i i I i i � j y i I MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 110111[5 l. -MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB F CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA 1 _1 Am; MEZZANINE—— MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 11011JES f r ;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA I UPPOR FLOOR _C1� MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES I101RE5 0 I j i N [DVIrY CNI C CDUL i i P ;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA € i x111 I - - `` wlF I alta. 01 I m H+� I a . tri BW o ,LCI' XII[N N [DVIrY CNI C CDUL •1 •' ' a�— ii �inlnmlwm " �ni! rv! • Ral n.v.v n 1 nW nl/tf n •fir •XMy 1Y ,v~ F�X•n tl IIYO F F•IH. •F Y n/.FFYN, x 11 M,iFrIFIi� 1,100 f p{•Y IYI./a•I.f 61u W /yll Y MX4Nxl`„M[SF O 4,^-11 M•CIM r M .r F ta,IF 40yi 1rypW rl F /1 •IlnM 1XML\ MMUI 4F X Na t• IIY9 ullut tlNF• 1 MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES HOMES i E 1 i i r1 I I , r ,MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA 1 90UTN OLEVATION �ECTIOM A -A MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES IIOItIES fJ MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOVIES MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES NOIRES ;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB • CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA The Nrchiteas Office Wehner, Nowysz, Pottschull and Pfiffner 201 dey buiiding, Iowa city. Iowa 52240 IOWA CITY SENIOR CITIZENS CENTER *preliminary Cost Estimate 6-20-79 Exterior Repair and Construction ION $ 22,500 Masonry repair (stone and brick) Insulation and new roofing, drainage 43,000 and flashing Window repair and storm sash 54 000 Repair existing and install new entrances 22,500 $142,000 $142,000 Total Interior Remodeling $340,000* General Construction • Demolition, new walls, stairs, flooring, ceiling, etc. $198,000 Mechanical Construction Heating, cooling, piping, ductwork $ 90,000 Electrical construction New service, lighting and distribution system. Sprinkler System - all floors $ 29,000 Elevator - four stop hydraulic 37 000 �_ � $694,000 $694,000 Total $ 61,700 Kitchen Equipment Mezzanine floor complete with mech/ 13$ 2,000 elec., egress modifications $1,102,700 TOTAL ESTIMATED CAST 102,970 Contingency (10%) $1,132,670 Architect's and Engineer's Fees 101.940 COST $1,234,610 TOTAL CONSTRUCT Estimate for second floor $200,000 paint, repair, windows, new partitions for stairs, *Subject to Owner's materials selection for the interior surfaces. rolond wehner I wllllom nowysz rlchord pottsch ll John pfiffner j Im schoenfelder benJomin cholt members of the omedcon institute of architects MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RARIDS•DES MOVIES TEL. 319338.9715 '.-MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA I KITGN�N EQUIP.M�, IDWA CITY SEN10�2 01 1 I N0. No. De,12G It�'(IDN Gt.j MAN UFAGTUP�EP,' MoDel� 1 TRAY E SILVER DISPENSER •_ 1 ,._CADDY _ _ _- . __. CM1418-CS $ 900.00 2 PLATE DISPENSER 1 CADDY CM 1020D $ 900.00 I 3 M7BILE DISPENSER 2 CADDY I CM 20200 $ 1,000.00 �4 SERVING UNIT (5 SEC.) 1- - DUKE _ -_ - - S-5. SR-DLSS _�$ 1,764.00 -_- I`l� -- SERVING UNIT (3 SEC.) .._. _ 1_. DUCE _ 5-3-SR-DLSS I S 1,228 ;00 i 6 SERVICE STAND 1 PROGRESSIVE CSD -3 _-- _ $ - 900:00 - �. i 7 KETTLE EXISTING_•-'-----._...-- ---------- ------• -- .. 8 COFFEE MAKER -- - . 1 -- BLMI0-FATIC _..__._.._ RT 35 - _. _5_-450.00 III II 9 SERVICE STAND - - ,•1 PROGRESSIVE _ ,._CSD -2 _-•____. $ 670_00 i r 10 -1 ICE DISPENSER 1 KODRAFT _- _ - _ $3,900,00 f. :T1 DISH TABLE (SOILED)W/POT SINKS_ 1 _ - - _ - - _-_ _- _ _- - $4,000.00 ----.--� CLEAN DISH COIBJTER----- -. _ a.. 1- -... -•----•- - _. 13 GARBAGE DISPOSAL - I� HP I IN-SINK-_�•-SS-150.._, I_ $ 730.00 __• -_ DISHWASHER W/BDOSTERHEATER + HOBART AM12 $ 3,000.00 .. i14 15 1 GARBAGE DISPOSAL - 3/4 HP •-__ I., ,. IN-SINK-ERATOR f _ SS --75 $1,650.00 I i 16 • MDBILE BUSSING CART•., _ , 1 _ _ -, SEGO _,- ;__ 3S-2133-2SA $ 180.00 i I I1 17 MULTI-PURPOSE RACK 1 PRECISIC14 MPR -12 $ 330.00 I! . :I 18 MIXER 1 IWART D300 W/OPTIONAL $2,.550,00 __..__..._.._... .. ._.._......_. - i..-.._.. ,- ._ . .. ATTACHMENTS I f I MICRONLMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 110TUES ;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA OrGHEN EQUIP.MENf - IOWA GIfY sEHIoQ GEh'i 33 UPRIGHTS/SHELVES (GALVANIZED) i SEGO 34 LAVATORY ] I I i 35 I SS SERVING COUNTER 36 I 14' TRAY SLIDE ] "REVISED 6-20-79 TOTAL MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES IIOIIIES AKld1. 1 I I - i $ 370.00 $ 500.00 $61,702.00 �(I oN Q, MAN U FAcTU R MOPEI, ir EhT Go1,-( 19 UTILITY STAND BAKERS TABLE _. 1 1 SES - -__ - DUKE SECO �_2q_TSS.._... .. 63061 I .$ 400.00_. $1,600.00 I $ 300.00 $ 7.,020 .00 ' 20 • . 21 UNDERCOUNTER STORAGE BINS/ DRAWER UNIT 22 S.S. SINK UNIT 1 r...r CONVECTION OVEN -. 2 U.S. RANGE 901-2-2 24 STEAMER (GAS FIRED STEAM GEN) 1 MARKET FORGE A PLUS G $ 7,000.00 25 BRAISING PAN (23 GAL.) 1 MARKET FORGE 1500 $ 3,850.00 26 FAUCET UNIT 1 MARKET FORGE M6F _ $ 200.00 - 27• RANGE (48") 1 U.S. RANGE - PF24TG-4-28A $ 1,400.00 $ 1,000.00_ 28 WORK -COUNTER W/SINK AND DOUBLE OVERHEAD SHELVES 1 29 POT AND PAN RACK - 1 SECO - -- 8908 - -_ $ 260.00 REFRIGERATOR ] VULCAN -HART CSA -46-T $ 1,650.00 $ 2 500 .00 _$ 7,500.00 - I $ 2,000.00 31 SS WORK COUNTER W/DOUBLE SINK 1 2 32 WALK-IN COOLER/FREEZER 1 THERMO-KOOL • 33 UPRIGHTS/SHELVES (GALVANIZED) i SEGO 34 LAVATORY ] I I i 35 I SS SERVING COUNTER 36 I 14' TRAY SLIDE ] "REVISED 6-20-79 TOTAL MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES IIOIIIES AKld1. 1 I I - i $ 370.00 $ 500.00 $61,702.00 r I I k li j i I i i 1 i i • � j I 4 r _ ;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA 1 BEST DOCUMENT AVAILABLE Dntei Tune 22, 1979 To: h!nyor Robert Mevera noa Wfnmbr.rn of the City 4ouncil From: Cora TI. Pollock Re: d'y resiF,nRt inn from the Iowa. City Rousing Coulrnission Due to other corunit�'ments, I will no longer be able to serve on tl.e Town Ci Ly Fhunirig Conuninnion. Plonrtn nrcept my reeionnLion from this romnission na of todny. I hn.ve enjoyed meeting nod working with other commission members Rod with related city staff personal. FIICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES HOMES H ;,MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA City of Iowa Cit. ME, MORANDUM Date: June 28, 1979 To: Neal Berlin and City Council From: Dick Plastino, Director of Public Works Re: Contract Amendment for the Parking Garage ck 64 Design Contract The Block 64 Design Contract has a base fee of $81,000. The contract was negotiated during June of 1978 and finally signed in August of 1978. The contract provides that the fee be based upon a bid date within the first three months of 1979. If the project is not bid in this period the lump sum fee on the noncompleted phases of the contract is subject to renegotiation. The Consultant has asked for an additional $13,750. This is based upon a certain percentage of a new estimated construction cost using the percentage of the amount of work left to be done. The City countered with an offer utilizing the Engineering News -Record Building Cost Index and an inflation rate of one percent a month. We felt that the fee should be adjusted from $81,000 to someplace. between $82,000 and $88,000 and made and offer of $85,000. The Consultant has made another offer to adjust the fee by an additional $8,000. This appears equitable. It would closely agree with the City's maximum offer based on a inflation rate of one percent a month from the date the contract was signed in August. In reality, the fee was agreed upon last June. In addition, the Consultant had done a large amount of additional work on the Block 83-84 Parking Garage due to the fact that we bid the job before the plans and specifications had been approved by our Code Review Agency. This created additional work for the Consultant and the additional work was not small in magnitude. In summary, based upon an inflation factor and additional work put forth with no adjustment of fee on the Block 83 Garage, I would recommend to Council that we accept the offer of $8,000 adjustment in the design fee. We have received excellent service from this Consultant and I feel we have obtained a hard fair bargain on the fee negotiation. The Mayor's signature is needed. for this design fee adjustment. Council should be aware that the staff has also agreed to the following points which were handled at staff level as specified in the contract: 1. We have authorized the Consultant to do a post -tension structural design based upon a 2.6 multiplier with a $20,000 not 137! MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DCS MOINES ;.MICROFILMED BY DORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA to exceed. This is another structural system other than pre- tension and we believe we will get this money back four to five times over by more competitive bids. i 2. We have added a design for parking system operation at a lump sum figure of $6,500. This is based upon a nine percent design fee on the estimated construction cost above .the beyond the ( basic parking garage structure. 3. We have authorized payment to the Contractor. of $2,250 for Ij sprinkler and ventilation design. This was not anticipated in the original contract but State Building Codes, local building codes, and Fire Department concerns dictated that we include sprinklers and ventilation in the bottom portion of the garage. As I have stated, I believe we have been fair but firm with the Consultant in all portions of this contract and and the Council should feel confident that we are receiving a dollar's worth of design services for a dollar spent. cc: Block 64 file N1 Paul Glaves bj4/13-14 e;7' MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOVIES ;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB • CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA RESOLUTION 0. 79-296 RE9DLUi'ION AUTHORIZING A49SIIx`.M TO AGRFTIIE[VT BETWEEN THE CITY OF IOWA CITY AND CARL WALTER AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORAIID, PURSUANT TO TERSLS SET FOEMI IN SECTION V, MUPENSATION FOR SERVICES. ll r'!', ,/. W1DiREAS, the City of Iowa City and Carl Walker and Associates, Inc., entered into a contract on August 8, 1978 in order to provide design services for the Block 64 parking garage, which contract was duly executed and authorized by this Council. WHEREAS, Section V, "Compensation for Services" of said contract provides that the City will pay $81,000 for consulting services for performance of Phases A,B,C, and D described in the agreement and that such amount is based on a lump sum consulting fee to be bid within the first three months of 1979. WHEREAS, said section further provides that where the project is not bid during this period, that such lump sum fee on uncompleted phases shall be subject to renegotiation, WHEREAS, the consulting fee project has not in fact been bid during the first three months of 1979; and further, that renegotiation has been effected with Carl Walker and Associates, Inc., and that the parties have agreed to increase the base lump sun from $81,000 to $89,000, and that the additional $8,000 shall be paid in Phase D (Bidding and Construction) based on percentage of actual completion. WHEREAS, all other terns of the agreement are and shall remain the same as set forth in the original contract. KIEBEFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF IOWA CITY, IOWA: that the Agreement Amendment between the City of Iowa City and Carl Walker and Associates, Incorporated is herein incorporated in its entirety, and further that said Amendment should be and hereby is approved according to provisions set forth in Section V, Compensation for Services. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Finance Director is authorized to make payment of an additional $8,000 for purchase of consulting services, and that such payment shall in no way exceed $89,000, said increase to be paid in Phase D based on percentage of actual completion. BE IT FLRITEiER RESOLVED that all other provisions of the original contract are now and shall remain the same. It was moved by Balmer and seconded by Neuhauser that the Resolution as read be adopted, and upon roll call there were: MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES '10111ES 13741 r I i � I I I i i i I I x 1 i t ,I Perret x E� I 1! I !i �r { {I 1 1 r r a i i11"4 , , 4yr r .fiat - ( 4'M1�ROFILMEO BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA l � Resolution No. 79-296 Page 2. AYFS: NAYS x Balmer x deProsse x Erdahl x Neuhauser x Perret x Roberts x Vevera Passed and approved this 3rd day of _July , 1979. Attest: City Clerk Mayor MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS.DES MOINES RCCEIVFD b L77110'731) BY IUE LSCSL LEPdR:V.Fk a I ;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB i IN iiL 13 SM • CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA LCLe4e- AGREEMENT AMENDMENT"` "' cA The City of Iowa City and Carl Walker and Associates, Incorporated, entered into a contract on August 8, 1978. The purpose of the contract was to provide design services for a 450 car parking garage on Block 64 in Iowa City. Section V, Compensation for Services, provides that the City will pay $81,000 for performance of Phases A, B, C, and D described in the agreement. It also provides that the lump sum consulting fee is based upon a bid date within the first three months of 1979. If the project is not bid in this period, the lump sum fee on the noncompleted phases of the contract is subject to renegotiation. The City of Iowa City and Carl Walker and Associates, Incorporated have negotiated an adjustment to the base fee from $81,000 to $89,000. This additional $8,000 shall be paid as part of Phase D based upon the percentage of completion of Phase D. All other contractual agreements in the original contract shall remain unchanged. The undersigned do state that this contract is executed in triplicate, as though each were an original and that there are no oral agreements that have not been reduced in writing in this instrument. FOR THE CITY: CARL WALKER AND ASSOCIATES: Mayor ATTEST: 011 -fu City Clerk STATE OF IOWA SS: JOHNSON COUNTY ) On this ,�day of 1979, before me, a Notary Public duly commissioned and uall fed n and for said County and State, personally appeared Robert A. Vevera, Mayor of the City of Iowa City, Iowa, and Abbie Stolfus, City Clerk of said City, each being to me personally known to be the identical persons and officers named in the foregiong instrument, who executed the same under and by virtue of the authority vested in them by the City Council of said City, and each for himself acknowledged the execution thereof to be his voluntary act and deed for purposes herein expressed. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and notarial seal at Iowa City, Iowa, the day and year last above written. L Notary Public In 00 for Johnson County, Iowa FIICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 110RIE5 1 ' I . 1 i I I. it I I 11 I I I i I i I 1 I I� I� II j` j; 1 I r :NCROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA STATE OF IOWA ) JOHNSON COUNTY ) 55: On this a 6t4- day of 1979, before me, the undersigned, a Notary PublicY and r. id Counyy and said State, personally appeared t C /D and to me per o ally �Inown w o be me duly sworn, did say that they are the d respectively, of said corporation; that no seal has been procured by the said) (the seal affixed thereto is the seal of said) corporation; that said instrument was signed and sealed on behalf of said c1prpqra �Yn by authority of its Board of Directors' and that the said 1 and as such officers, acknowledged the execution of sa d instrument -'to voluntary act and deed of said corporation, by it and by them voluntarily executed. otary Pub Ic In and for A�ohnson County, Iowa N� V, �QrVNOT,�RTh4 cnW . ••c„ •ihti0��•N `'DIY' MICROFIVED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 1101REs HLCLIVED A APPROM By TRE LEGAL DEPARTMUT 6-.78-79 �4'vC� i 9 I i ;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB `I • CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA RESOLUTION NO. 79-297 RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING POSITION BY PAY RANGE FOR CLASSIFIED PERSONNEL OF THE CITY OF IOWA CITY, IOWA FOR FY80 WHEREAS, the City of Iowa City, Iowa, employs certain personnel referred to as classified personnel, and, WHEREAS, it is necessary to establish salaries for the said classified personnel, and, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF IOWA CITY, IOWA, that the classified employees shall receive as salary compensation that amount which is set forth after each respective title in the Administrative Pay Plan in lieu of all other fees and compensations, except as otherwise provided by law, and where an employee shall receive any fees for other compensation for services within the scope of his or her employment, he or she shall remit the same to the City Clerk for the City Treasury. It was moved by Balmer and seconded by Perret that the resolution as read A-be adopted, and upon roll call there were: AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: x Balmer xdeProsse x Erdahl x Neuhauser x Perret x Roberts x Vevera Passed and approved this 3rd day of July 1979 ATTEST: = CITY CLERK MAYOR MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES IIOIIIES R:•71,4FD A EFIRC7: 137 7 i A -MI CROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB I1. � • CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA City of Iowa CL MEMORANDUM Date: June 25, 1979 To: The Honorable Mayor and City Council ° From: Patricia S. Brown, Director, Human Relations Re: City of Iowa City Administrative (non-unidn) Pay Plan During the period April 1 to June 1, 1979, a formal job evaluation program was conducted by the Department of Human Relations for all City employees. The program was designed to: 1, analyze present job duties and titles within our City classification structure; 2. determine pay comparability for similar positions in communities with like demographic characteristics; 3. devise a manageable system of compensation, consistent with budgetary limitations; and, 4. eliminate previous inequities within the old classification structure. As a result of the analysis, the following was accomplished: 1. A new classification structure was developed, taking all City classifications and placing them within one administrative pay plan. 2- Salary adjustments were made consistent with salary data available. 3. Several new position descriptions were added to the pay plan. They are: Clerk Steno I, Clerk Steno 1I, Administrative Secretary, Administrative Assistant, Assistant City Attorney iI, Assistant City Attorney III and Budget Administrator. These are not additional employees but rather existing employees whose positions will now carry different titles because of the duties they perform. This change provides an incentive for future career growth. 4. Several changes occurred within the system. They were: - Senior Clerk Typist: changed to Administrative Clerk Typist; - Senior Account Clerk: changed to Administrative Account Clerk; - Civil Rights Specialist: changed to Affirmative Action Compliance Analyst; - Personnel Specialist: changed to Personnel Analyst; - Administrative Assistant: changed to Budget Administrator, and the position of A6ministrative Assistant reclassified into Range 9 of the Pay Plan. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES 1377 --MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAS CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA 2 While the Pay Plan recognizes extended ranges for all employees and brings non -bargaining unit employees in line with projected cost of living increases for union members during FY80, it does not suggest that all employees will be extended to the end of .the grade range maximum. The • actual maximum salary paid will be based upon budgeting restraints, future pay surveys and other factors. In addition, a salary administration and performance appraisal program has been designed to accompany the new Pay Plan. It is designed to accurately and fairly administer the new Pay Plan Classification System, placing much emphasis on results achieved. bdw5/3-4 MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOIRES 1377 i i I i j i i f j 1 � I 1 I I i li I! I j j, II. i I j i I i i I I i i r I ;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA PROJECTED COST OF SALARY INCREASE July I , 1979 Total Confidential Salaries- 19 employees Current salaries Projec Total Percent Detail of in Cost of Percent Merit Percent 212,286.00 1 1 :,,MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA PM7LX,ZM COST OF SM.ARY mCRF,AM July 1, 1979 Total managanent salaries - 62 aTloyees Current salaries 1,239,350.00 Projected Salaries 1,379,855.00 Total increase 140,505.Ou per cent of increase 11.3% Detail of increase - 62 mployees Cost of living 77,376.00 Percentage of increase 6.7" Merit 54.662.00 . Percentage of increase 4.7- T17TAIS 140,505.00 11.4% MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 110PIES j 1377 1 MiC(tO-ILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA JOB ELA-1LUNTION PLAN PX Cil -y De I K 7 q I� J I I' NI 1 Of Iowa C arrmenr o i l -y FY 1980 f Personnel MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DLs •iDlaES 1371 r _MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA ' City o4 Iowa C6 -,f AI DATE: June 29, 1979 TO: City Council Members FROM: Patricia S. Brown, Human Relations Director RE: Attached are corrected copies of page (s).. 162, 166 and 167 in the FY80 Pay Plan, These changes were made after the original packet was distributed on ,lune 26, 1979, Please insert in your booklet. Thank you MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES f I r ! i I i i j "i i t r _MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA ' City o4 Iowa C6 -,f AI DATE: June 29, 1979 TO: City Council Members FROM: Patricia S. Brown, Human Relations Director RE: Attached are corrected copies of page (s).. 162, 166 and 167 in the FY80 Pay Plan, These changes were made after the original packet was distributed on ,lune 26, 1979, Please insert in your booklet. Thank you MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES ,MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB I • CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION i I Phase I - Data Preparation 3 A. Internal Job Analysis 3 B. External Salary Surveys q Phase II - Job Evaluations g A. Job Evaluation Procedures g I. Skilled and Unskilled 12 a. Classification System 12 b. Classification Results 20 2. Office and Clerical I 54 a. Classification System 54 b. Classification Results 55 3. Professional and Technical Bg a. Classification System 89' b. Classification Results 115 4. Supervisors and Executives 116 Phase III - Administrative Pay Plan Guidelines ISO A. Present City Pay Plan ISO B. Revised City of Iowa City Pay Plan 163 Phase IV - Salary Administration Guidelines 170 A. Salary Administration Program I 170 1. Annual Adjustment Increases 171 2. Merit Increase Adjustment 171 3. Exceptional Service Increases 172 4. Accelerated Salary Increases 172 B. Performance Appraisal System CONCLUSION I I MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOIRES i I _ I t r i I i 1 I' i I I MIGROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA 1 ' CITY OF IOWA CITY DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL JOB EVALUATION PLAN FISCAL YEAR 1980 I ntroduction The following report represents the result of a comprehensive analysis of the City of Iowa City's administrative pay plan for fiscal year 1980. All positions under the jurisdiction of the City Manager's office and the library were evaluated in April of 1979 to determine proper classifications with any appropriate changes. The primary objective of the study was to develop an efficient and effective salary administration program that would allow for proper compensation of City employees, within budgetary limits. A number of problems had surfaced with the old administrative pay plan. First and foremost was the disparity between employees represented by a bargaining unit and employees considered confidential or administrative. Although collective bargaining agreements had taken into consideration cost of living allowances, the administrative pay plan had failed to keep pace over the last two MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MI011jEs ;JMICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA I �I 2 years. As a result, administrative employees, and some supervisory employees, were in some instances below bargaining unit employees. This created a serious inequity in .compensation for comparable duties performed. Additionally, supervisory and executive pay scales had lost ground with respect to new responsibilities assumed and the rising cost of living. In many instances, supervisory pay scales were equal to, and sometimes less than, the pay of the staff they supervised. Executive compensation, in the absence of an adequate executive compensation program, was some 10 to 15 percent below comparable positions in like communities. These problems were aggravated by exceptional City program growth and expansion and increased visibility insofar as service delivery was concerned. The in- flexibility of personnel policies and programs, coupled with inconsistent application, only served to increase the frustration of both line and staff management of the City. The study encompassed five phases: Phase 1 - gathering of any information required to conduct formal analysis; Phase 2 - analysis of all data received to make necessary revisions and/or modifications; MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES IIOIIIES i - i I i 4 i f i i i I i -'MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA i 3 r"` Phase 3 - development of an administrative pay plan consistent with City policies and procedures; Phase 4 - development of formal salary administration and performance appraisal plan; Phase 5 - implementation of revised system. Each stage works in consort with the previous stage in an attempt to identify the correlation between each function. The results of the study, procedures utilized and recommendations are included in the following section. Phase 1 - Data Preparation. A. Internal Job Analysis Phase 1 included the compilation of all data required to complete the study. Initial information was gathered from employees within each department of the City. A Job description questionnaire was distributed on April 10, 1979 to all department directors requiring that all non -bargaining unit employees accurately complete the questionnaire, MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOIDEs ­;MiCROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA 1 I Upon completion, supervisors signed and returned the form noting any exception or discrepancies. Cooperation was received from the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees' union and on April 30, 1979, the same questionnaire was distributed to AFSCME employees. No response was received from the president of the police union; the president of the firefighter's union felt it would be more appropriate if one representative filled out the questionnaire on behalf of all the members. The next step involved comparing the submitted questionnaire with the current employee job description to i note any severe discrepancies or disparity of functions. -- The questionnaire utilized key factors In the analysis and was keyed into the evaluation of the job which would be conducted in Phase 2 of the process. (See Appendix A). B. External Salary Survey In order to assess the pay practices of the City of Iowa a _ j City, an external survey was conducted. S � s This survey focused on midwestern cities whose demographic characteristics were similar to the City of MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOVIES -;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA i Iowa City and/or had a Big Ten university as a major employer. All similar cities within the State of Iowa were surveyed in addition to the midwestern municipalities. The cities selected were: Iowa Ames, Burlington, Cedar Falls, Council Bluffs, Des Moines, Sioux City Midwest Bloomington,. Indiana; Boulder, Colorado; Champaign, Illinois; Columbus, Ohio; DeKalb, Evanston, Illinois; Lincoln, Nebraska; Madison Wisconsin; Manhattan, Kansas Responses were received from all of the above municipalities with the exception of Madison, Wisconsin. The survey data concentrated on comparable positions and/or titles, as well as minimum, maximum and mid -point irange salary data for each position. One of the major factors in selecting the positions to be surveyed was the relative comparability of cities between Iowa City and other towns. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES -MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA 1 mommear --I —.I — 00 JOB TITLE IOWA CITY Ift/w lww OTHER 10" CITIES minim maxim OTHER MIDWEST CITIES minim max/mc, LOCAL AREA IOWA CITY OTHER IOWA CITIES 3 EMPLOYERS- v%gefulary averaq;aWI.t minima -XIM .1dixtintloo Per month MIDWESTERN CITIES menage aftipoitit/co LOCAL EMPLOYERS average midpoint/. 27. Affirmative New. Anal. 937 1291 1222 1519 1155 1439 ... 1114 1371 1297 ... 20. 11,s:. Ptrog. Su r. If OSS ITA 1021 1272 1124 1408 ... ... IODZ 1147 INS ... 29, Pnq. Coord./glock Grant IIDO 1742 1450 1795 1402 1736 ... 1425 1618 IS70 ... 30. Controller 1100 1749 is" 1889 1I59 1903 --- 1425 1697 lei -These salaries npesent the 2yd AM 3rd quardle of the sulyeY. SALARY COMPARISON SUMMARY MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLA13 CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 110IIIES 00 ' ;'MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB -1 1 • CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA iCITIES JOB TITLE IOWA CITY -Weo an/m OTHER IOW dNm maa/m OTHER MIOREST CITIES mdNm eaa/m LOCAL AREA IOW CITY EMPLOYERS- rge/salary dn/m tas/mo addWint/m OTHER IOWA CITIES avera9��int per ninth MIOYESIERn CITIES average midpoint/m LOCAL EMPLOYERS average midpoint/m 1. Accmnt Clerk 691 909 744 918 759 975 570 768 807 871 847 669 2. Asst. Cfty Attorney 1100 1749 1247 1677 1418 1750 1425 1460 1584 3' Nousing Tnsoector 916 1187 1054 1701 1099 1766 1052 1178 1277 _ 4. Bus Driver 748 979 BSA 978 870 911 864 916 871 5. Clerk Typist 677 877 616 759 660 814 589 621 775 688 777 605 S. Mechante II 865 1179 994 1181 1046 1280 945 1276 1002 1088 1167 1091 _ 7. Oln, P A P bevel. 1590 2528 1647 2455 2077 2497 2059 2149 2267 B. 01r.. Flume 1590 2528 1950 2728 2169 2750 - - 2059 2740 2460 f 9. 01r.. Hrmn Relations 1590 2528 1494 1947 1884 2440 -- 2059 1721 2162 10. Dir., kirks A Recreation 1590 2528 1612 2261 1997 2440 - 2059 1940 2217 - IL. Dir.. Public Works 1590 2520 2005 2570 2245 2697 2059 2778 2469 12, Elmtrician 86S 1179 1076 1277 IOOB 1175-- - 1002 1177 1092 17. Engfoeering Alde 877 1095 076 1080 977 1197 964 978 1087 14, Fire Chief 1590 2528 1707 2252 2097 2500 2059 1978 2297 15, Fire Fighter 9f5 1181 965 1157 IOM 1265 1068 1061 1165 _ I 16. Inspector 951 1271 1078 1777 1107 1766 1091 1205 1275 17. Library Assistant 776 1015 727 910 874 1090 --- --- 896 all 982 -•- 18. RlntomMe Worker 1 677 877 721 898 005 947 477 622 775 810 816 548 19. ltalntmence Yorker III 804 1055 975 1179 1000 1277 792 1179 970 1077 1119 986 25 T fflc Emolpter 1100 1749 1576 1912 1488 1875 -- - 1425 1724 1681 26. Tratment Plant Op. I 601 1055 952 1149 970 1173 -- 970 1051 1072 SALARY COMPARISON SUMARY MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES IIOIIIES V I n IiI i I _ i i I i i i i r ;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA i 6 In light of this, sufficient descriptive information was provided to survey participants in an effort to assure position similarities. Additionally, positions chosen contain 'us and fundamental factors to V, h5parity. The positions •t, Maintenance Worker Library Assistant, ice Worker III, I, Firefighter, .tor, Planning and ,gent, Fire Chief, ,e Chief, Director of fien[, Director of Human Relates.. .rits and Recreation, Director of Finance, Housing Inspector, Affirmative Action Compliance Analyst, Traffic Engineer, Recreation Program Supervisor II, Program Coordinator Block Grant and Controller. Salary data for each of these positions was analyzed and the median minimum, maximum and mid -point range was ascertained for each position. This information was then compared to present City salaries. Based on the fact that most of the information gathered reflected changes in cities as of 1978, an additional factor was added to that taking into consideration cost of living increases. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB :EDY,R RAPIDS•DES HOMES �M -.MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA TAKE OF PRECEDING DOCUMENT MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS.DrS Imllus DORM MICROLA13 TARGET SERIES 0 i ;M[GROFILMED 8Y JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA 0 In light of this, sufficient descriptive information was provided to survey participants in an effort to assure position similarities. Additionally, positions chosen contained enough homogeneous and fundamental factors to offset any possible chance of disparity. The positions chosen for study were: Clerk Typist, Maintenance Worker I, Account Clerk, Bus Driver, Library Assistant, Administrative Secretary, Maintenance Worker III, Mechanic II, Treatment Operator I, Firefighter, Engineering Aide, Electrician Inspector, Planning and Program Analyst I, Purchasing Agent, Fire Chief, Director of Public Works, Police Chief, Director of Planning and Program Development, Director of Human Relations, Director of Parks and Recreation, Director of Finance, Housing Inspector, Affirmative Action Compliance Analyst, Traffic Engineer, Recreation Program Supervisor II, Program Coordinator Block Grant and Controller. Salary data for each of these positions was analyzed and the median minimum, maximum and mid -point range was ascertained for each position. This information was then compared to present City salaries. Based on the fact that most of the information gathered reflected changes in cities as of 1978, an additional factor was added to that taking into consideration cost of living increases. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES '40111ES ,.-,MICROFILMEB BY JORM MICROLAB • CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA r uwin/mo JOB TITLE IOW CITY ata/em OTHER IOW CITIES edn/eo swas OTHER MIDWEST CITIES min/m ra/eu LOCAL ARU EMKOIERS• aln/= mdw IOW CITY rge/salary sddpoint/sa IOW OTCITIES average e�int Per aonth CHER ESTE MICIITTIESIES average eldpo (ntlsm LOCAL EMpLDT ERS average addpolnt/vo 1. kcmnt Clerk 697 909 744 918 759 935 570 768 803 831 841 2. Ant. City Attorney 1100 1749 1247 1673 1418 1750 --- --- 1425 1460 1584 669 --- I ): HNSJ.q InjWftr 916 1187 1054 1301 1099 13661052 - 1178 1237 1235 1 f i I 4. Bus Driver 748 979 8 S4 978 830 911 --- --- 864 916 871 --- S. Clerk typist 673 077 616 7S9 660 814 589 621 775 698 737 605 613 3§ 6 Mechanic 11 065 1139 994 1181 1046 1280 94S 1236 1002 1088 1163 1091 7. Dir. P A P Dcvel. 1590 2528 1843 2455 2037 2497 - 2059 2149 2267 IOSS 93S 1139 B. Dir.. finance 1590 2528 1950 2728 2169 2750- 1119 2059 2340 2460 1381 1144 . 9. Dir., bean Relations 1590 2528 1494 1941 1884 2440 1260 2059 1721 2162 2528 1753 Dir.,- A kcmtfon1590 2338 2528 1512 2267 1993 2440 2038 2059 _1940 2217 . 1749 f10. 11. Dlr. public Works 1590 2528 2005 2670 2245 2693 --- 2059 2338 2469 813 1141 i. i3. 2 1"trician 865 1139 1076 1277 1008 1175 907 1002 1177 24. Personnel Spec/Analyst 1100 Emolnetrfrig Aide 833 1095 876 1080 973 1193 -- -- 964 978 1093 14 Tom Chief 1590 2528 1703 2252 2093 2500 2059 1978 2297 1165 1197 1•: n.._ Fighter 955 1181 9 S 1157 1064 1265 - . 1068 1061 16. Inspector 951 1231 1078 1333 1103 1366 - 1091 1205 1235 17. Library Assistant 776 1015 723 910 814 1090 --- --- 896 817 982 ... 16 rdinttsame Worker 1 613 817 121 898 805 947 473 622 775 810 816 148 9. Maintenance Yorker III 8D4 IOSS 93S 1139 1000 1237 792 1179 930 1037 1119 986 fn_ Aselveti1099 1381 1144 1443 Il l3 1107 1226 1294 1260 Ila�.�r/P[q0 23. Police Chief 1590 2528 1753 2322 2338 2.728 2059 2038 2533 ... 22. PurchasingAgent--- i 1100 1749 1344 1810 1349 1625 .._ 1425 1577 1487 23. Admin. Secretary 813 1141 802 1013 862 1074 801 901 977 907 968 851 24. Personnel Spec/Analyst 1100 1749 1197 ISIS 1114 1450 1425 1356 1312 . 2S. Tmffic Emalpter 1100 1749 1536 191Z 14011 1875 - 1425 1724 1681 26. Treatment Plant Op. 1 604 1055 952 1149 970 1177 930 1051 1012 sAu9r COMPARISON wxuRr MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES v / ;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA 1 Y y w r Phase 2 - Job Evaluation. .s w = The second phase included the process of evaluation for each of the w positions in question. Since the evaluation of all jobs would include i a total of some 300 plus positions, a number of bench mark jobs were selected to be representative of each class. A. Job Evaluation Procedures .. The purpose of the job evaluation was to determine the relative values of jobs within the City in order to establish equitable wage rates for them. The very nature of the process dictated that each job within the organization be fairly and accurately evaluated in order to ensure a solid foundation for compensation and future organizational I 1 design and growth. The success of the City's job evaluation required a plan by which organized judgment could be applied to comparison and appraisals of jobs. A sequential plan of t action was developed to ensure continuity of the evaluation process. la �i This process followed the following four basic steps: tl 6 �i MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOINES i 11 I j I i I. 1 1, + 1� 1 t I I, r; i• n. i. I i 1 r ;,MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA pa 10 (1) The selection of bench mark jobs and preparation of a description for each. To assure adequate, factual information, a representative group of jobs had to be chosen. These jobs had to be sufficiently diverse in duties iand responsibilities to note the difference in skills and training required to perform the job i satisfactorily. The following conditions were met in selecting the jobs: a) the number of jobs to be selected was limited to a maximum of 20; b) provision was made for adequate dispersion of the jobs chosen so that they represented all levels within the organization; c) jobs were selected that were most common within the organization. The jobs selected for evaluation were: Maintenance Worker I, Maintenance Worker III, Mechanic I, Senior Maintenance Worker, Word Processing Operator, MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES HOMES 'ryr OFILMED BY JORM MiCROLAB 11 • CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA Account Clerk, Senior Clerk Typist, Secretary I, Senior Account Clerk, Rehabilitation Finance Specialist, Assistant Superintendent, Community Development Block Grant Coordinator, Controller, Superintendent and Director. The next step in the process was choosing the job evaluation factors to be used in the analysis. Typically, it has been impossible to develop a single plan of job evaluation . factors applicable to all employees, as each group of jobs in the organization have different skill, mental and educational requirements. Factors for job evaluation were developed around a) skilled and unskilled labor, b) office and clerical employees, c) technicians and professional personnel, d) supervisors and executives. Each of these occupational groupings were reascndbly homogeneous yet they contained characteristics that were common to them but yet different from each other. In selecting these job evaluation factors, the following principles were applied: MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 1401IIES MICROFILMED BY JORM MiCROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA 1 r-. 12 a) each factor was independent and not influenced by any other factor; b) no more factors were selected than were absolutely necessary; c) each factor was simple, specific and concrete and clearly defined. Factors that were used in the evaluation process are identified according to each occupational grouping so as to understand the homogenity that existed between each group. Group 1• Skilled and Unskilled Labor A. The Classification System The first group to be evaluated consisted of skilled and unskilled labor positions within the organization. Considering the very Impact skilled and unskilled labor assignments can have on the total operation of the City, i.e. in the repair of equipment, in the operation of the transit system and in street clearing and snow removal seasons, this was a very important i HICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOINES ;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA i MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOIRES a 13 d �. occupational grouping within the City z classification structure. Four positions were chosen to be bench marked and representative .e of all the classifications within this grouping. These positions were: Maintenance Worker I, i Maintenance Worker III, Mechanic 1, and Senior Maintenance Worker. ..i The evaluation system used for this particular group of employees centered around four major components. These components were ` knowledge, responsibility, effort and working conditions. Since knowledge of a job must necessarily be determined through a number of factors, we found it necessary to break this j I r particular factor into three distinct classes. i According to the relative importance of each, i IJ knowledge was broken down into the following a groupings: Job Knowledge 6n This factor considered the education, knowledge r and experience the worker had to possess in i order to perform the job satisfactorily. It was MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOIRES IICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES. IOWA 14 measured by the complexity and practical knowlege the worker possessed whether it was gained by on the job experience, prior training and education, or both. It was also limited by the nature of instructions to be received regarding the work task at hand and by the amount of supervision provided. Knowledge of the job was found to be three- fold: a) Knowledge of equipment and tools. The machines to be operated and maintained; what needed .to be set up . and adjusted; types of equipment to be dismantled and repaired and the tools required in the process; b) The knowledge of methods and processes used to set up or adjust for maintenance repair and/or construction; and, i c) The knowledge of materials. The recognition and uses of certain materials and their individual working properties. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB , LZVAR RAPIDS•DES 140114ES I ;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA 15 Within this factor of job knowledge some measure also had to be identified for the broad scope of knowledge for this classification. The scope of knowledge was found to be measured in three degrees: 1. Casual - Either incidental or casual knowledge with little or no experience; 2. Working - General or workable knowledge with average skill and some experience; 3. Expert - Exceptional knowledge and skill with considerable training and experience In this area. Once these parameters were decided and assigned, the second component to be examined was Responsibility. Responsibility had a total of five subfactors designed to measure the relative responsibility assigned to each position. Responsibility for Equipment and Tools was seen as a measure of the job's responsibility for performing without damaging tools or equipment. It evaluated the responsibility for IIICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOINES 0 `MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA 1 16 - preventing damage due to the carelessness or negligence of the operator in the performance of the job. Credit was based on the care required to prevent damage and in the consideration of the estimated cost of any damage that might occur 11 for any one mishap. Auxiliary equipment which was not actually used by the job was not taken i Into consideration. The relative equipment a expense of the equipment was not included and did not necessarily involve a high degree of �. responsibility unless, however, a slight mistake i would have involved a serious loss of life or property. Responsibility for Materials was also considered to be a very important factor in the measure of the job for this category. It measured the responsibility required to produce a quality service or to prevent or minimize damage to processing and equipment. It appraised the responsibility for preventing waste or loss of raw materials through partially finished — products or services. The cost of losses was measured by any one of the following: cost of MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES IIOIIIES 0 ;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA t ' I 17 _I ;i i Il i ;� i i I i i I damage to the service or the equipment and I i i i ;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA t ' MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES IIOIDES 17 �s w damage to the service or the equipment and iI product, reduction in value as a result and the cy cost of =placing, repairing or rehandling that i N which was damaged. The Responsibility for Direction and Instruction of Others is an intrical part of this particular classification. It measured the responsibility which went along with the job for instructing and directing the work of others. It was not intended to appraise supervisory responsibilities for results nor did this even come into play when evaluating the job. The number of _ individuals directed was considered as those given immediate guidance and also those indirectly assisted through any of the channels. Given the nature of the positions in questions, Responsibility for the Safety of others was also a very important factor. It evaluated the worker's responsibility for protecting, { safeguarding or working carefully to prevent '1 injury to others. Careless operation of 4 machines or handling of materials or tools by the 1 �. employee was rated in relation to its access to injury to others. This factor appraised the care MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES IIOIDES ,,MKROPILMED BY JORM MiCROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA I `t 18 necessary to prevent injury to others and the probable extent of such injury. The third component and the factors for position within this classification was Effort. Under Mental and Visual Attention was also considered to be an important factor in the evaluation of this job. It considered the concentration and alertness, both mental and visual, required by the job. It also measured the type of work or problems encountered and was limited by the _ frequency of occurrence of problems and the degree of alertness and concentration necessary for this solution. Consideration was also given to the variety of work, the amount or complexity .0;7r•_ --- .1-_.I MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOIDES subtitle effort, physical effort considered the w ' amount and continuity of physical effort 1 j J required to perform on the job. it was w ; t' measured by the amount of weight each individual handled, the awkwardness and ra position of handling and the possibility of any w damage. It was also limited by the frequency of I occurrence. Consideration was given to the method of handling and the periods of rest or i unoccupied time. Mental and Visual Attention was also considered to be an important factor in the evaluation of this job. It considered the concentration and alertness, both mental and visual, required by the job. It also measured the type of work or problems encountered and was limited by the _ frequency of occurrence of problems and the degree of alertness and concentration necessary for this solution. Consideration was also given to the variety of work, the amount or complexity .0;7r•_ --- .1-_.I MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOIDES r ;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB 19 • CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA of planning or inspection and the coordination of visual with mental dexterity. The fourth component, Working Conditions, contained the subcomponent Hazards which appraised the hazards, both accidental and health, connected with or surrounding the job, even considering the fact that all safety devices had been installed. Consideration had to be given to materials handled, machine or tools used, the work position, the possibility of accidents and the probable seriousness of injury. Where the position had several different hazards, consideration was given to the greatest of these hazards from the standpoint of time exposed or the probability and severity of injury. Surroundings measured the disagreeable features of the Job itself. Features considered were those which affected the physical sense or caused discomfort to the employees. Typical causes of discomfort measured were dirt, fumes, odors, heat, cold, dampness, dust, glare, vibration, noise, wearing a respirator, inadequate lighting and poor ventilation. In MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOIRES i i�MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES 20 W evaluating this factor, consideration was given �I w to the relative amount and continuity of .I exposure to those conditions which make the job ., undesirable. i B. Classification Results No attempt was made to reclassify bargaining r unit positions until such time that negotiations reopened between the City of Iowa City and the American Federation of State, Couny and .0 rl ' Municipal Employees. Nevertheless, the evaluation follows In each position. Data - collected will be used in negotiation of contracts once these contracts expire. i.. b MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES •,;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA 21 JOB EVALUATION F Y79 POSITION: MW I DATE: 5/25/79 CLASSIFICATION: SKILLED & UN -SKILLED LABOR RANGE: EVALUATION COMPONENTS KNOWLEDGE This factor, considers the education, knowledge and experience the worker must have to perform the job satisfactorily. It is measured by the complexity of practical knowledge the worker must possess whether it be gained by on-the-job experience, prior training and education or both. It is limited by the nature of instructions received regarding work task and by the amount of super- vision received. 1. Job Knowledge Point Total Range Points a. Knowledge of equipment and tools 1-16 _ Knowledge of equipment and tools - machine to be operated and maintained, what needs to be set up and adjusted, what is to be dismantled and repaired, and the tools to be used in the process. b. Knowledge of methods & procedures 1-13 _ Knowledge of methods & processes - process of setting up and adjusting or maintenance, repair and construction of a particular article or project. C. Knowledge of materials 1-13 _ Knowledge of materials - recognition and uses; working properties. Maximum Total Points: 42 Maximum Assigned Points: 17 FACTOR DEGREES: Scope of knowledge is measured In three degrees: 1) casual - incidental or casual knowledge and little or no experience; 2) working - general or workable knowledge with average skill and some experience; 3) expert - exceptional knowledge and skill and considerable training and experience in this area. r,- MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOVIES r ,`MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA i 22 Knowledge of tat Equipment & tools I. Rough & simple hand tools, simple equipment. 2. Precision tools, simple 8 to ordinary equipment. 3. Ordinary to semi -complex equipment. 4. Comples to very complex equipment. (b) Methods & processe(s) Point Spread Casual Working Expert 1-5 6-10 11-16 Point Spread Casual Working Expert 1. Simple work. 1-4 5-9 10-13 2. Routine or common methods. T 3. Complicated methods. 4. Very complicated methods. (c) Materials 1. None required. 2. Common materials easy to recognize or learn about. 3. Wide variety of materials used repetitively. 4. Wide variety of materials used in complex or non- reptitive operations. RESPONSIBILITY 2. Responsibility for Equipment and Tools This factor is a measure of the job's responsibility for preforming work without damaging tools or equipment. It evaluates the responsibility for preventing damage due to carelessness or negligence to the equipment used in the performance of a Job. Credit is based on the care necessary to prevent damage and in consideration of the estimated cost of the damage for any one mishap. Auxilliary Point Spread Casual Working Expert 1-4 5-9 10-13 MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MONIES Point Total Range Points 1-16 81 J J r ,;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB 23 • CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA equipment not actually used by the job should then be taken into consid- eration if careless actions by the worker may result in damage to it. The use of expensive equipment does not necessarily involve a high degree of responsibility unless, a slight mistake will involve a serious loss of life or property. FACTOR DEGREES: Use of Equipment (a) Little care required. Damage not likely to occur. (b) Ordinary care required. Some oppor- tunity of damage of small consequence. (c) Steady care required. Regular oppor- tunity for but not frequent occurrence of damage. Damage fairly large. (d) Special care required. Frequent 11 opportunity for damage of consider- able extent or less frequent oppor- tunity for greater damage. (r:) Sustained, special care required. Continuous opportunity for damage of serious nature. Maximum Total Points: 16 Maximum Assigned Points: 11 3. Responsibility for Materials This factor is a measure of the responsibility required to produce a quality service, or to prevent or minimize damage to processing and equipment. .It appraises the responsibility for preventing waste or loss of raw materials or partially finished products through error. There should not be a use of either a maximum or a mimimum but an average based on normal expectation. The cost of losses may be any of the following: 1) cost of damage to product, 2) reduction in the value, 3) cost of replacing, repairing or rehandling the servicing that was to be delivered, FACTOR DEGREES: Use of Material MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RANDS -DES MOINES Point Spread 0-16 1 2-4 5-7 8-11 12-16 Point Range 0-8 Total Points 6 Point Spread 0-8 G ;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB ------..__ _ • CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOIRES 0 (a) Little are required. Damage not _._. likely _ gofred. Somesmall 1 (b) ordinary oy. damageare consequence. Regular lunira 2-3 (c) Average steady care required. — for but not frequent opportunity opportunity of damage. Damage fairly occurrence 6 4-6 large. (d) special care required. Frequent for damage of consider- opportunity importance or less frequent oppor- able tunity for damge of large importance. 7-8 (e) Sustained, special care required. Opportunity or damage Continuous of serious nature. Maximum Total Points: B Maximum Assigned Points: 6 4. Responsibility for Direction & Point Total points Instruction of Others Ran e This factor measures the responsibility for instructing 0-6 0 which goes with the job the work of others. It is and directing intended to appraise supervisory not responsibilities for results. The directed shall be number of individuals as those given immediate considered guidance and also those Indirectly assisted through any channels,Point spread 0-6 FACTO: 0 (a) Responsibility only for own work, _— coordinate work with others. 1 but may (b) Responsible for instructing, directing two helpers 50% or more of the one or 2 3 time. directing (c) Responsible for instructing, -- Of or setting up for a small group usually in the same occupa- employees tion up to 10 persons. directing Responsible for instructing, 4-6 (d) flow of work in maintaining and to 20 persons. a group of employees up Maximum Total Points: 6 Maximum Assigned Points: 0 MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOIRES ;IIICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB • CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA 25 5. Responsibility for the Safety of Others Point This factor evaluates a worker's responsi- Sprea, bilily for protecting, safeguarding or working carefully to prevent injury to 0-6 others. Careless operation of machines or handling of materials or tools by the employee on the job being rated may result in injury to others. Accordingly, this factor appraises: a) the care necessary to prevent injury to others, and b) the probable extent of such injury. Total Points 4 FACTOR DEGREES: Point Spread 0-6 (a) Generally works on opeations where 0 any injury caused others would be very slight. (b) Handles materials or uses tools on 2 operations where there is some possibility of causing minor cuts, bruises or burns. (c) Performs work where improper action may possibly cause severe cuts, bruises or burns resulting in lost time of less than two weeks duration. (d) Performs work where improper action _ may cause broken bones, very severe burns, or exposure to health hazards, resulting in lost time of more than two weeks. (e) Performs work where improper action may cause loss of hand or foot or eye, or considerable exposure to occupational diseases, resulting in permanent disability. Maximum Total Points: 6 Maximum Assigned Points: 2 6. Physical Effort Point Spreac This factor considers the amount and continuity of physical effort required to perform a job. 0-5 It is measured by the amount of weight per unit handled, awkwardness and position of handling. It Is limited by the frequency of occurrence. Consideration should also be given to the method of handling and the periods of rest or unoccupied time. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES 110111ES 1-2 3-4 5 6 Total Points 4 i I I I i I i i I i ; I Very Light Medium Heavy j of Effort Light II I I i i i I'. is ( MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA I ' r�i '~I 26 FACTOR DEGREES: 0 1-2 3-4 5 Very Light Medium Heavy Continuity of Effort Light 6-30 31-75 76 or More 0-5 lbs lbs lbs lbs (a) Infrequent exertion (b) Intermittent to 0, ordinary exertion (c) Average to steady exertion _ _ (d) Constantly sustained exertion i i Maximum Total Points: 5 Maximum Assigned Points: 4 7. Mental & Visual Attention Point Total Spread Points This factor cosiders the concentration and alertness, both mental and visual, required 0-8 2 by a. job. It is measured by the type of work or problems encountered. It is limited by the frequency of occurrence of problems and the degree of alertness and concentration necessary for their solution. Consideration should also be given to the variety of work, amount of complexity of planning or inspecting and the coordination i of visual with manual dexterity. FACTOR DEGREES: i Point Spread 0-8 (a) Little, mental and Intermittent 0 visual attention. Work of the most simple sort requiring no close nor sustained attention. (b) i Ordinary mental or visual attention. 2 1-2 — Work where irregularities are difficult or fairly infrequent or minor in effect. (c) Frequent mental or visual attention. 3-5 Work involves some likelihood of irregularity or difficulty, (d) Continuous mental and visual attention. 6-7 Operation requires constant alertness. (e) Concentrated mental and visual 8 attention. Work involves planning and laying out complex work. Maximum Total Points: 8 Maximum Assigned Points: 2 HICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES IICIDES ;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB I 27 • CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA B. Hazards this factor appraises the hazards, both accident and health, connected with or surrounding the job, even though all safety devices have been installed. Consider the material being handled, machine or tools used, the work position, the possibility of accident, even though none has occurred, and the probably seriousness of the injury. Where the job has several different hazards, consider the greatest of these hazards from the standpoint of time exposed or the probability and severity of injury. FACTOR DEGREES: (a) Accident or health hazards absent or negligible. (b) Exposure to lost time accidents such _ as abrasions, cuts, bruises or burns. Health hazards negligible. (c) Exposure to lost time accidents, such 2 as crushed hand or foot, loss of fingers, eye injury from flying particles, some exposure to occupantional diseases not incompacitating in nature. (d) Exposure to incapacitating accidents _ or health hazards, such as loss of arm or leg, impairment of vision. (e) Exposure to accidents or occupational _ disease which may result in total disability or death. Maximum Total Points: 5 Maximum Assigned Points: 2 9. Surroundings This factor is a measure of the disagreeable features of a job. The features to be con- sidered are those which affect the physical sense or cause discomfort to the employees. Typical causes of discomfort are dirt, fumes, odors, heat, cold, dampness, dust, glare, vibration, noise, wearing a respirator, inadequate lighting and poor ventilation. Consider also the relative amount and continuity of exposure fo those conditions which make the job undesirable. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOINES Point Total Spread Points 0-5 _2 Point Spread 0-5 0 1 2 3-4 61 Point Total Spread Points 0-4 2 I I 1 I I f I i I 1 � j I i I 1 I I f I i, i i 1 I I� If I i ,,MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA SI FACTOR DEGREES: (a) Pleasant surroundings with no objec- tionable features. (b) Fair conditions or rare exposure to disagreeable elements., (c) Occasional exposure to disagreeable 2 elements. (d) Frequent exposure to one particularly disagreeable element or continuous exposure to several. (e) Continuous and intensive exposure to extremely hazardous elements. Maximum Total Points: 4 Maximum Assigned Points: 2 TOTAL POINTS ASSIGNED - ALL CATEGORIES: 46 MAXIMUM TOTAL POINTS - ALL CATEGORIES: 100 MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOINES Point Spread 0-4 0 i 1 2 3 I I � Ii I i W i MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOINES Point Spread 0-4 0 — 1 2 3 4 W i R) EI t u� i I L J I ;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB 1 • CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA 29 I JOB EVALUATION FY79 j POSITION: MW III DATE: CLASSIFICATION: SKILLED & LIN-SKILI.ED LABOR RANGE: LVALt1ATION COMPONENTS KNOWLEDGE This factor considers the education, knowledge and experience the worker must have to perform the job satisfactorily. It is measured by the complexity of practical knowledge the worker must possess whether it be gained by on-the-job experience, prior training and education or both. It is limited by the nature of instructions received regarding work task and by the amount of super- vision received. Point Total 1. Job Knowledge Range Points a. Knowledge of equipment and tools 1-16 Knowledge of equipment and tools - machine to be operated and maintained, what needs to be set up and adjusted, what is to be dismantled and repaired, and the tools to be used in the process. b. Knowledge of methods & procedures 1-13 Knowledge of methods & processes - process of setting up and adjusting or maintenance, repair and construction of a particular article or project. C. Knowledge of materials 1-13 Knowledge of materials - recognition and uses, working properties. Maximum Total Points: 42 Maximum Assigned Points: 36 FACTOR DEGREES: Scope of knowledge is measured in three degrees: 1) casual - incidental or casual knowledge and little or no experience; 2) working - general or workable knowledge with average skill and some experience; 3) expert - exceptional knowledge and skill and considerable training and experience in this area. "57— MICROFILMED 9Y JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 110111ES ILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA t 30 a of pment & tools Rough & simple hand tools, simple equipment. Precision tools, simple to ordinary equipment. Ordinary to semi -complex 14 equipment. Comples to very complex equipment. Point Spread Casual Working Expert 1-5 6-10 11-16 Point Spread Casual Working Expert (b) Methods & processe(s) 1-4 5-9 10-13 1. Simple work. 2. Routine or common methods. 3. Complicated methods. —7r- 4. Very complicated methods. Point Spread Casual Workin Expert (c) Materials 1-4 5-9 10-13 1. None required. 2. Common materials easy to recognize or learn about. 3. Wide variety of materials used repetitively. 11 4, Wide variety of materials used in complex or non- reptitive operations. i RESPONSIBILITY 2. Responsibility for Equipment and Tools Point Total This factor is a measure of the job's Range Points responsibility for preforming work 1-16 1L without damaging tools or equipment. It evaluates the responsibility for preventing damage due to carelessness or negligence to the equipment used in the performance of a job. Credit is based on the care necessary to prevent damage and in consideration of the estimated cost of the damage for any one mishap. Auxilliary MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOVIES o+ ,MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA i equipment not actually used by the job should then be taken into consid- eration if careless actions by the worker may result in damage to it. The use of expensive equipment does — not necessarily involve a high degree of responsibility unless, a slight mistake will involve a serious loss of life or property. FACTOR DEGREES: Use of Equipment Point Spread 0-16 (a) Little care required. Damage not 1 likely to occur. (b) Ordinary care required. Some oppor- 2-4 tunity of damage of small consequence. i(c) Steady care required. Regular oppor- 5-7 tunity for but not frequent occurrence of damage. Damage fairly large. (d) Special care required. Frequent 8-11 opportunity for damage of consider- able extent or less frequent oppor- tunity for greater damage. i (e) Sustained, special care required. 11 12-16 Continuous opportunity for damage of serious nature. Maximum Total Points: 16 J Maximum Assigned Points: 11 i J 3. Responsibility for Materials Point Total This factor is a measure of the Range Points responsibility required to produce a quality service, or to prevent or minimize 0-8 damage to processing and equipment. It _6 appraises the responsibility for preventing f waste or joss of raw materials or partially finished products through error. There should not be a use of either a maximum -: or a mlmimum but an average based on normal l expectation. The cost of losses may be any of the following: 1) cost of damage to product, 2) reduction in the value, 3) 1 cost of replacing, repairing or rehandling ., the servicing that was to be delivered. FACTOR DEGREES: Point Spread 0-8 Use of Material MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOINES I I ;MICRUFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB i • CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MONIES 32 — (a) Little care required. Damage not 0 likely to occur. —' (b) Ordinary care required. Some oppor- 1 tunity of damage of small consequence. _ (c) Average steady care required. Regular 2-3 opportunity for but not frequent occurrence of damage. Damage fairly — large. (d) Special care required. Frequent 6 q_g opportunity for damage of consider- _ able importance or less frequent oppor- tunity for damge of large importance. (e) Sustained, special care required. 7_8' Continuous opportunity for damage 1 of serious nature. Maximum Total Points: 8 Maximum Assigned Points: 6 4. Responsibility for Direction & j Instruction of Others Point Total This factor measures the responsibility Range Points which goes with the job for instructing 0-6 3 and directing the work of others. It is not intended to appraise supervisory responsibilities for results. The `- number of individuals directed shall be considered as those given immediate guidance and also those indirectly assisted through any other channels. I FACTOR DEGREES: I j Point Spread 0-6 i (a) Responsibility only for own work, 0 but may coordinate work with others. ` (b) Responsible for instructing, directing 1 one or two helpers 50% or more of the time. (c) Responsible for instructing, directing 3 I 2-3 I or setting up for a small group of employees usually in the same occupa- tion up to 10 persons. (d) Responsible for instructing, directing 4-6 and maintaining the flow of work in a group of employees up to 20 persons. I. Maximum Total Points: 6 Maximum Assigned Points: 3 MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MONIES J ,MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB 33 CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA 5. Responsibility for the Safety of Others any injury caused others would be Point This factor evaluates a worker's responsi- Spread bility for protecting, safeguarding or Handles materials or uses tools on working carefully to prevent injury to 0-6 others. Careless operation of machines or handling of materials or tools by the possibility of causing minor cuts, employee on the job being rated may result in injury to others. Accordingly, this factor appraises: a) the care necessary Performs work where improper action to prevent injury to others, and b) the probable extent of such injury. Total Points 9_ FACTOR DEGREES: Point Spread 0-6 (a) Generally works on opealions where 0 FIICROFIIMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 110111ES Total Points 2 any injury caused others would be very slight. (b) Handles materials or uses tools on 1-2 operations where there is some possibility of causing minor cuts, bruises or burns. (c) Performs work where improper action 3-4 may possibly cause severe cuts, bruises or burns resulting in lost time of less than two weeks duration. (d) Performs work where improper action 5 5 may cause broken bones, very severe burns, or exposure to health hazards, resulting in lost time of more than two weeks. (e) Performs work where improper action 6 may cause loss of hand or foot or eye, or considerable exposure to occupational diseases, resulting in permanent disability. Maximum Total Points: 6 Maximum Assigned Points: 5 6. Physical Effort Point Spread This factor considers the amount and continuity of physical effort required to perform a job. 0-5 It is measured by the amount of weight per unit handled, awkwardness and position of handling. It is limited by the frequency of occurrence. Consideration should also be given to the method of handling and the periods of rest or unoccupied time. FIICROFIIMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 110111ES Total Points 2 i 5 Medium Heavy i i. i I i lbs r ;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA 34 FACTOR DEGREES: 0 1-2 Very Light Continuity of Effort Light 6-30 0-5 lbs lbs (a) Infrequent exertion _ (b) Intermittent to 0, ordinary exertion _ (c) Average to steady exertion _ (d) Constantly sustained exertion Maximum Total Points: 5 Maximum Assigned Points: 2 7. Mental & Visual Attention This factor cosiders the concentration and alertness, both mental and visual, required by a job. It is measured by the type of work or problems encountered. It is limited by the frequency of occurrence of problems and the degree of alertness and concentration necessary for their solution. Consideration should also be given to the variety of work, amount of complexity of planning or inspecting and the coordination of visual with manual dexterity. FACTOR DEGREES: (a) Little, mental and intermittent visual attention. Work of the most simple sort requiring no close nor sustained attention. (b) Ordinary mental or visual attention. _ Work where irregularities are difficult or fairly infrequent or minor in effect. (c) Frequent mental or visual attention. _ Work involves some likelihood of irregularity or difficulty. (d) Continuous mental and visual attention. 6 Operation requires constant alertness. (e) Concentrated mental and visual _ attention. Work involves planning and laying out complex work. Maximum Total Points: 8 Maximum Assigned Points: 6 2 MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES IIOINES 3-4 5 Medium Heavy 31-75 76 or More lbs lbs Point Total Spread Points 0-8 6 Point Spread 0-8 0 1-2 3-5 6-7 8 7 �i i 1 I I I r (MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA I 35 B. Hazards This factor appraises the hazards, both accident and health, connected with or' surrounding the job, even though all safety devices have been installed. Consider the material being handled, machine or tools used, the work position, the possibility of accident, even though none has occurred, and the probably seriousness of the injury. Where the job has several different hazards, consider the greatest of these hazards from the standpoint of time exposed or the probability and severity of injury. FACTOR DEGREES: (a) Accident or health hazards absent or negligible. (b) Exposure to lost time accidents such as abrasions, cuts, bruises or burns. Health hazards negligible. (c). Exposure to lost time accidents, such 2 as crushed hand or foot, loss of fingers, eye injury from flying particles, some exposure to occupantional diseases not incompacitating in nature. (d) Exposure to incapacitating accidents or health hazards, such as loss of arm or leg, impairment of vision. (e) Exposure to accidents or occupational disease which may result in total disability or death. Maximum Total Points: 5 Maximum Assigned Points: 2 9. Surroundings This factor is a measure of the disagreeable features of a job. The features to be con- sidered are those which affect the physical sense or cause discomfort to the employees. Typical causes of discomfort are dirt, fumes, odors, heat, cold, dampness, dust, glare, vibration, noise, wearing a respirator, inadequate lighting and poor ventilation. Consider also the relative amount and continuity of exposure to those conditions which make the job undesirable. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB I CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES Point Total Spread Points 0-5 P_ Point Spread 0-5 0 1 1A 3-4 5 Point Total Spread Points 0-4 3 i I t ,MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES 36 FACTOR DEGREES: Point Spread 0-4 (a) Pleasant surroundings with no objec- 0 tionable features. 1 (b) Fair conditions or rare exposure to _ disagreeable elements., 2 (c) Occasional exposure to disagreeable (d) elements. Frequent exposure to one particularly 3 3 ^ disagreeable element or continuous exposure to several. 4 (e) Continuous and intensive exposure to extremely hazardous elements. Maximum Total Points: 4 Maximum Assigned Points: 3 TOTAL POINTS ASSIGNED ALL CATEGORIES: __34 MAXIMUM TOTAL POINTS - ALL CATEGORIES: 100 i r.I.i I �j MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES I ;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA 1 ' 37 JOB EVALUATION FY79 11051 t ION: Mechanic I _ DAJ E: CLASSIFICATION: SKILLED & ()N-SKILI.ED LABOR RANGE: LVALUATION COMPONENTS KNOWLEDGE This factor considers the education, knowledge and experience the worker must have to perform the job satisfactorily. It is measured by the complexity of practical knowledge the worker must possess whether it be gained by on-the-job experience, prior training and education or both. It is limited by the nature of instructions received regarding work task and by the amount of super- vision received. Point Total 1. Job Knowledge Range Points a. Knowledge of equipment and tools 1-18 _ Knowledge of equipment and tools - machine to be operated and maintained, what needs to be set up and adjusted, what is to be dismantled and repaired, and the tools to be used in the process. b. Knowledge of methods & procedures 1-13 Knowledge of methods & processes - process of setting up and adjusting or maintenance, repair and construction of a particular article or project. C. Knowledge of materials 1-13 Knowledge of materials - recognition and uses, working properties. Maximum Total Points: 42 Maximum Assigned Points: 4➢_ FACTOR DEGREES: Scope of knowledge is measured in three degrees: 1) casual - incidental or casual knowledge and little or no experience; 2) working - general or workable knowledge with average skill and some experience; 3) expert - exceptional knowledge and skill and considerable training and experience in this area. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOIRES 1 E (MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA 1 38 Knowledge of Point Spread Casual Working Expert (a) Equipment & tools I. Rough & simple hand tools, 1-5 6-10 11-16 simple equipment. 2. Precision tools, simple to ordinary equipment. 3. Ordinary to semi -complex 15 equipment. 4. Comples to very complex _ equipment. Point Spread Casual Working Expert (b) Methods & processe(s) 1. Simple work. 1-4 5-9 10-13 2. Routine or common methods. 3. Complicated methods. 12 4. Very complicated methods. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES HOMES Point Spread Casual Working Expert (c) Materials 1. None required. 1-4 5-9 10-13 2. Common materials easy to recognize or learn about. 3. Wide variety of materials _ used repetitively. 4. Wide variety of materials 13 used in complex or non- reptitive operations. RESPONSIBILITY 2. Responsibility for Equipment and Tools Point Total This factor is a measure of the job's Range Points responsibility for preforming work without damaging tools or equipment. 1-16 14 It evaluates the responsibility for preventing damage due to carelessness or negligence to the equipment used in the performance of a job. Credit is based on the care necessary to prevent damage and in consideration of the estimated cost of the damage for any one mishap. Auxilliary MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES HOMES r� w. ;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA 39 equipment not actually used by the job should then be taken into consid- eration if careless actions by the worker may result in damage to it. The use of expensive equipment does not necessarily involve a high degree of responsibility unless, a slight mistake will involve a serious loss of life or property. FACTOR DEGREES: Use of Equipment (a) Little care required. Damage not likely to occur. (b) Ordinary care required. Some oppor- tunity of damage of small consequence. (c) Steady care required. Regular oppor- tunity for but not frequent occurrence of damage. Damage fairly large. (d) Special care required. Frequent opportunity for damage of consider- able extent or less frequent oppor- tunity for greater damage. (e) Sustained, special care required. 14 Continuous opportunity for damage or serious nature. Maximum Total Points: 16 Maximum Assigned Points: 14 3. Responsibility for Materials This factor is a measure of the responsibility required to produce a quality service, or to r_"vent or minimizu damage to processing and equipment. It appraises the responsibility for preventing waste or loss of raw materials or partially finished products through error. There should not be a use of either a maximum or a mimimum but an average based on normal expectation. The cost of losses may be any of the following: 1) cost of damage to product, 2) reduction in the value, 3) cost of replacing, repairing or rehand,ing the servicing that was to be delivered. FACTO -EES: Ilse of Material MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 110IIIES Point Spread 0-16 1 2-4 5-7 B-11 12-16 Point Range 0-8 Point Spread 0-8 Total Points 7 f MCROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DLS MOINES ;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR I RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA Ila (a) Little care required. Damage not 0 likely to occur. (b) Ordinary care required. Some oppur- 1 lunity of damage of small consequence. (c) Average steady care required. Regular 2-3 opportunity for but not frequent occurrence of damage. Damage fairly large. (d) Special care required. Frequent 4-6 opportunity for damage of consider- able importance or less frequent oppor- tunity for damge of large importance. (e) Sustained, special care required. 7 7-6 Continuous opportunity for damage of serious nature. Maximum Total Points: 8 i i Maximum Assigned Points: 7 4. Responsibility for Direction & Instruction of Others Point Total This factor measures the responsibility Range Points which goes with the job for instructing 0-6 0 and directing the work of others. It is not intended to appraise supervisory responsibilities for results. The number of individuals directed shall be considered as those given immediate - guidance and also those indirectly assisted through any other channels. " FACTOR DEGREES: I Point Spread 0-6 (a) Responsibility only for own work, 0 0 but may coordinate work with others. r (b) Responsible for instructing, directing 1 _ one or two helpers 50% or more of the time. (c) Responsible for instructing, directing 2-3 or setting up for a small group of employees usually in the same occupa- tion up to 10 persons. (d) Responsible for instructing, directing 4-6 and maintaining the flow of work in a group of employees up to 20 persons. Maximum Total Points: 6 Maximum Assigned Points: 0 MCROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DLS MOINES ;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAS CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA 41. S. Responsibility for the Safety of Others any injury caused others would be Point Total This factor evaluates a worker's responsi- Spread Points bility for protecting, safeguarding or Handles materials or uses tools on working carefully to prevent injury to 0-6 5 others. Careless operation of machines or handling of materials or tools by the possibility of causing minor cuts, employee on the jab being rated may result in injury to others. Accordingly, this factor appraises: a) the care necessary Performs work where improper action to prevent injury to others, and b) the probable extent of such injury. FACTOR DEGREES: Point Spread 0-6 (a) Generally works on opeations where 0 MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES Total Points _Z any injury caused others would be very slight. (b) Handles materials or uses tools on 1-2 operations where there is some possibility of causing minor cuts, bruises or burns. (c) Performs work where improper action 3-4 may possibly cause severe cuts, bruises or burns resulting in lost time of less than two weeks duration. (d) Performs work where improper action 5 5 may cause broken bones, very severe burns, or exposure to health hazards, resulting in lost time of more than two weeks. (e) Performs work where improper action 6 may cause loss of hand or foot or eye, or considerable exposure to occupational diseases, resulting in permanent disability. Maximum Total Points: 6 Maximum Assigned Points: 5 6. Physical Effort Point Spread This factor considers the amount and continuity of physical effort required to perform a job. 0-5 It is measured by the amount of weight per unit handled, awkwardness and position of handling. It is limited by the frequency of occurrence. Consideration should also be given to the method of handling and the periods of rest or unoccupied time. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES Total Points _Z �rMICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB • CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA r� lip FACTOR DEGREES: 0 1-2 3-4 5 (a) Very Light Medium Heavy Continuity of Effort Light 6-30 31-75 76 or More 0-5 lbs lbs lbs lbs (a) Infrequent exertion (b) Intermittent to 0, ordinary 1-2 exertion (c) Average to steady exertion _ 2 (d) Constantly sustained exertion 3-5 Maximum Total Points: 5 Maximum Assigned Points: 2 7. Mental & Visual Attention Point Total Operation requires constant alertness. Spread Points (e) This factor cosiders the concentration and 8 alertness, both mental and visual, required 0-8 5 by a job. It is measured by the type of work or problems encountered. It is limited by the frequency of occurrence of problems and the degree of alertness and concentration necessary for their solution. Consideration should also be given to the variety of work, amount of complexity of planning or inspecting and the coordination of visual with manual dexterity. FACTOR DEGREES: Point Spread 0-8 (a) Little, mental and intermittent 0 visual attention. Work of the most simple sort requiring no close nor sustained attention. (b) Ordinary mental or visual attention. 1-2 Work where irregularities are difficult or fairly infrequent or minor In effect. (c) Frequent mental or visual attention. 5 3-5 Work involves some likelihood of irregularity or difficulty. (d) Continuous mental and visual attention. 6-7 Operation requires constant alertness. (e) Concentrated mental and visual 8 attention. Work involves planning and laying out complex work. Maximum Total Points: a Maximum Assigned Points: 5 PIICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES I101NE5 M I i ;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA I I � � 43 8. Hazards Point Total Spread Points -- fhis factor appraises the hazards, both 2 accident and health, connected with or 0-5 surrounding the job, even though all — safety devices have been installed. Consider the material being handled, machine or tools used, the work position, the possibility of accident, even though _ none has occurred, and the probably seriousness of the injury. Where the job has several different hazards, consider — the greatest of these hazards from the standpoint of time exposed or the probability I i and severity of injury. FACTOR DEGREES: Point Spread 0-5 (a) Accident or health hazards absent 0 _ or negligible. ' (b) Exposure to lost time accidents such 1 as abrasions, cuts, bruises or burns. Health hazards negligible. (c) Exposure to lost time accidents, such _2 2 i as crushed hand or foot, loss of fingers, eye injury from flying particles, some exposure to occupantional diseases not incompacilating in nature. (d) Exposure to incapacitating accidents 3-4 or health hazards, such as loss of _. arm or leg, impairment of vision, (e) Exposure to accidents or occupational 5 _ disease which may result in total disability or death. i { Maximum Total Points: 5 2 i Maximum Assigned Points: 9. Surroundings Point Total Spread Points This factor is a measure of the disagreeable 3 "1 features of a job. The features to be con- 0-4 sidered are those which affect the physical • i. sense or cause discomfort to the employees. ,..I Typical causes of discomfort are dirt, fumes, odors, heat, cold, dampness, dust, glare, vibration, noise, wearing a respirator, inadequate lighting and poor ventilation. Consider also the relative amount and continuity of exposure to those conditions which make the job undesirable. j iis - -- • --' - --•— MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RANDS -DES MOINES r ;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA 44 FACTOR DEGREES: (a) Pleasant surroundings with no objec- i I tionable features. (b) Fair conditions or rare exposure to disagreeable elements., i (c) Occasional exposure to disagreeable elements. r (d) Frequent exposure to one particularly 3 disagreeable element or continuous exposure to several. (e) Continuous and intensive exposure to extremely hazardous elements. Maximum Total Points: 4 i 1 TOTAL POINTS ASSIGNED - ALL CATEGORIES: MAXIMUM TOTAL POINTS - ALL CATFrnalFc- j i t i i i y r ;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA 44 FACTOR DEGREES: (a) Pleasant surroundings with no objec- tionable features. (b) Fair conditions or rare exposure to disagreeable elements., (c) Occasional exposure to disagreeable elements. (d) Frequent exposure to one particularly 3 disagreeable element or continuous exposure to several. (e) Continuous and intensive exposure to extremely hazardous elements. Maximum Total Points: 4 Maximum Assigned Points: _ 3 TOTAL POINTS ASSIGNED - ALL CATEGORIES: MAXIMUM TOTAL POINTS - ALL CATFrnalFc- Point Spread 0-4 0 1 2 3 4 r -MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA i I i i 115 JOB EVALUATION FY79 w PUSI'fION: Sr. Maintenance Worker DATE: 5/29/79 it CLASSIFICATION: SKILLED & UN -SKILLED LABOR RANGE: M EVALUATION COMPONENTS KNOWLEDGE This factor considers the education, knowledge and have to the job experience the worker must perform satisfactorily. It is measured by the complexity of practical knowledge the worker must possess whether it be gained by on-the-job experience, prior training and education or both. It is limited by the nature of instructions received regarding work task and by the amount of super- vision received. Point Total Range Points 1. Job Knowledge — a. Knowledge of equipment and tools 1-16 Knowledge of equipment and tools - machine to be operated and maintained, what needs i to be set up and adjusted, what is to be i — dismantled and repaired, and the tools to I be used in the process. b. Knowledge of methods & procedures 1-13 Knowledge of methods & processes - process of setting up and adjusting or maintenance, repair and construction of a particular ii article or project. i C. Knowledge of materials 1-13 Knowledge of materials - recognition and uses, working properties. i Maximum Total Points: 42 t I i r42 Maximum Assigned Points: it I ,y I FACTOR DEGREES: Scope of knowledge is measured in three -� degrees: 1) casual - Incidental or casual knowledge and little or no experience; - 2) working - general or workable knowledge with average skill and some experience; 3) expert - exceptional knowledge and • skill and considerable training <:nd I J experience in this area. I i MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB - I 1 CEDAR RAPIDS -DES n0111ES i ;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB I ' 46 Knowledge of (a) Equipment & tools • CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA I. Rough & simple hand tools, simple equipment. 2. Precision tools, simple _ to ordinary equipment. 3. Ordinary to semi -complex equipment. 4. Comples to very complex 16 equipment. (b) Methods & processe(s) W Point Spread Casual Working Expert 1-5 6-10 11-16 Point Spread Casual Working Expert 1. Simple work. 1-4 5-9 10-13 2. Routine or common methods. _ 3. Complicated methods. 4. Very complicated methods. _7T_ (c) Materials 1. None required. 2. Common materials easy to _— recognize or learn about. 3. Wide variety of materials used repetitively. 4. Wide variety of materials 13 used in complex or non- replitive operations. RESPONSIBILITY 2. Responsibility for Equipment and Tools This factor is a measure of the job's responsibility for preforming work without damaging tools or equipment, It evaluates the responsibility for preventing damage due to carelessness or negligence to the equipment used In the performance of a job. Credit is based on the care necessary to prevent damage and in consideration of the estimated cost of the damage for any one mishap. Auxilliary Point Spread Casual Working Expert 1-4 5-9 10-13 HICRDFILREO BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES 110 IIIES Point Total Range Points 1-16 14 ;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA i IIICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOIRES equipment not actually used by the job should then be taken into consid- eration if careless actions by the worker may result in damage to it. The use of expensive equipment does not necessarily involve a high degree of responsibility unless, a slight mistake will involve a serious loss of life or properly. FACTOR DEGREES: 7 I Use of Equipment Point Spread 0-16 (a) Little care required. Damage not 1 likely to occur. (b) Ordinary care required. Some oppor- 2-4 tunny of damage of small consequence. r (c) Steady care required. Regular oppor- 5-7 tunity for but not frequent occurrence -' of damage. Damage fairly large. (d) Special care required. Frequent 8-11 opportunity for damage of consider- able extent or less frequent oppor- s tunity for greater damage. (e) Sustained, special care required. 14 12-16 Continuous opportunity for damage of serious nature. J Maximum Total Points: 16 Maximum Assigned Points: 14 3. Responsibility for Materials { Point Total This factor is a measure of the Range Points �I responsibility required to produce a quality service, or to prevent or minimize 0-8 8 damage to processing and equipment. It i appraises the responsibility for preventing waste or loss of raw materials or partially j finished products through error. There. should not be a use of either a maximum or a mimimum but an average based on normal expectation. The cost of losses may be any of the following: 1) cost of damage �f to product, 2) reduction in the value, 3) cost of replacing, repairing or rehandling 1 , I the servicing that was to be delivered. " FACTOR DEGREES: Point Spread 0-8 I ! I" Use of Material IIICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOIRES i w i Points 0 1 I I i. i I w ,MICROFILMED BY JORM IgICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA `I 48 (a) Little care required. Damage not _ likely to occur. (b) Ordinary care required. Some oppor- tunity of damage of small consequence. (c) Average steady care required. Regular_ opportunity for but not frequent occurrence of damage. Damage fairly large. (d) Special care required. Frequent _ opportunity for damage of consider- able importance or less frequent oppor- tunity for damge of large importance. (e) Sustained, special care required. 8 Continuous opportunity for damage of serious nature. Maximum Total Points: 8 Maximum Assigned Points: 8 4. Responsibility for Direction & Instruction of Others This factor measures the responsibility which goes with the job for instructing and directing the work of others. It is not intended to appraise supervisory responsibilities for results. The number of individuals directed shall be considered as those given immediate guidance and also those indirectly assisted through any other channels. FACTOR DEGREES: (a) Responsibility only for own work, _ but may coordinate work with others. (b) Responsible for instructing, directing 1 one or two helpers 50% or more of the time. (c) Responsible for instructing, directing _ or setting up for a small group of employees usually in the same occupa- tion up to 10 persons. (d) Responsible for instructing, directing and maintaining the flow of work in a group of employees up to 20 persons. Maximum Total Points: 6 Maximum Assigned Points: 1 MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOIDEs Point w Range Points 0 1 2-3 4-6 w 7-8 Point Total Range Points 0-6 1 Point Spread 0-6 0 1 Pal 4-6 7 .;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA 119 5. Responsibility for the Safely of Others bruises or burns resulting in lost Point Total This factor evaluates a worker's responsi- Spread Points bility for protecting, safeguarding or working carefully to prevent injury to 0-6 1 others. Careless operation of machines or handling of materials or tools by the employee on the job being rated may result in injury to others. Accordingly, this factor appraises: a) the care necessary to prevent injury to others, and b) the probable extent of such injury. FACTOR DEGREES: Point Spread 0-6 (a ) Generall works on opeations where 0 y any injury caused others would be very slight. (b) Handles materials or uses tools on 1-2 operations where there is some possibility of causing minor cuts, bruises or burns. (c) Performs work where improper action 4 3-4 may possibly cause severe cuts, bruises or burns resulting in lost time of less than two weeks duration. (d) Performs work where improper action may cause broken bones, very severe burns, or exposure to health hazards, resulting in lost time of more than two weeks. (e) Performs.work where improper action may cause loss of hand or foot or eye, or considerable exposure to occupational diseases, resulting in permanent disability. Maximum Total Points: 6 Maximum Assigned Points: 4 6. Physical Effort Point Spread This factor considers the amount and continuity of physical effort required to perform a job. 0-5 It is measured by the amount of weight per unit handled, awkwardness and position of handling. It is limited by the frequency of occurrence. Consideration should also be given to the method of handling and the periods of rest or unoccupied time. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 110IMES 5 9 Total Points 4 i I '.;P71CR.OFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA 1 MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES 11011JES 50 FACTOR DEGREES: 0 1-2 3-4 5 Very Light Medium Heavy Continuity of Effort Light 6-30 31-75 76 or More 0-5 lbs lbs lbs lbs (a) Infrequent exertion _ (b) Intermittent to 0, ordinary exertion " (c) Average to steady exertion (d) Constantly sustained exertion Maximum Total Points: 5 .f Maximum Assigned Points: 4 7. Mental & Visual Attention Point Total a� Spread Points This factor cosiders the concentration and r1 alertness, both mental and visual, required 0-8 6 by a job. It is measured by the type of work or problems encountered, It is _ limited by the frequency of occurrence of � problems and the degree of alertness and �^ I concentration necessary for their solution. Consideration should also be given to the �. variety of work, amount of complexity of planning or inspecting and the coordination of visual with manual dexterity. FACTOR DEGREES: Point Spread 0.8 r (a) Little, mental and intermittent 0 visual attention. Work of the most simple sort requiring no close nor _ sustained attention. (b) Ordinary mental or visual attention. 1-2 Work where irregularities are difficult or fairly infrequent or minor in effect. (c) Frequent mental or visual attention. 6 3-5 Work involves some likelihood of irregularity or difficulty. (d) Continuous mental and visual attention. 6-7 Operation requires constant alertness. (e) Concentrated mental and visual 8 attention. Work involves planning and i. laying out complex work. Maximum Total Points: 8 r Maximum Assigned Points: 6 MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES 11011JES r --,,MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB I `f %1 51 • CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA B. Hazards this factor appraises the hazards, both accident and health, connected with or surrounding the job, even though all safety devices have been installed. Consider the material being handled, machine or tools used, the work position, the possibility of accident, even though none has occurred, and the probably seriousness of the injury. Where the job has several different hazards, consider the greatest of these hazards from the standpoint of time exposed or the probability and severity of injury. FACTOR DEGREES: (a) Accident or health hazards absent or negligible. (b) Exposure to lost time accidents such as abrasions, cuts, bruises or burns. Health hazards negligible. (c) Exposure to lost time accidents, such _ as crushed hand or foot, loss of fingers, eye injury from flying particles, some exposure to occupantional diseases not incompacitating in nature. (d) Exposure to incapacitating accidents or health hazards, such as loss of arm or leg, impairment of vision. (e) Exposure to accidents or occupational _ disease which may result in total disability or death. Maximum Total Points: 5 Maximum Assigned Points: 2 9. Surroundings This factor is a measure of the disagreeable features of a job. The features to be con- sidered are those which affect the physical sense or cause discomfort to the employees. Typical causes of discomfort are dirt, fumes, odors, heat, cold, dampness, dust, glare, vibration, noise, wearing a respirator, inadequate lighting and poor ventilation. Consider also the relative amount and continuity of exposure to those conditions which make the job undesirable. MICROFILMED BY JORM WROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOVIES Point Total Spread Points 0-5 2 Point Spread 0-5 0 1 2 3-4 5 Point Total Spread Points 0-4 3 1377 ­JMICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA 52 FACTOR DEGREES: Point Spread 0-4 (a) Pleasant surroundings with no objec- tionable features. (b) Fair conditions or rare exposure to 1 disagreeable elements., (C) Occasional exposure to disagreeable 2 elements. (d) Frequent exposure to one particularly 3 3 disagreeable element or continuous exposure to several. (e) Continuous and intensive exposure to extremely hazardous elements. 4 Maximum Total Points: 4 Maximum Assigned Points: 3 TOTAL POINTS ASSIGNED - ALL CATEGORIES: 84 MAXIMUM TOTAL POINTS - ALL CATEGORIES: 100 MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES ;,MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB 1 • CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA 1979 JOB EVALUATION BENCH MARK POSITIONS OLD NEW CLASSIFICATION SALARY DATA GRADE POSITION POSITION ASSIGNED POINTS MAX POINTS FROM TO OLD-FROM/TO ` Skilled and Non -Skilled Laborers rr 1 MW I Same 46 100 1 / 1 690/894 ' 6 MW III Same 73 100 6 / 6 820/1072 L 7 Ilech. I Same 78 100 7 / 7 850/1112 8 Sr. MW Same 84 100 8 / 8 875/1193 I w N 1 1 f it f 1 I MICROFILMED BY ' JORM MICROLAB I CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOIRES r ;.MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA I 54 i Group 2: Office and Clerical Workers , A. The Classification System The evaluation of this second group required examination of _ factors similar to those in group one. However, the very i nature of the positions in this class required some additions ! and/or revisions to the basic factors. ! r j The evaluation system for this class concentrated on knowledge, responsibility, mental and visual attention and working conditions. I Knowledge, factor number one, identified three subfactors ` I important in the performance of the Job: methods and Procedures, equipment, education and training. Methods and procedures measured the ability to fully 1 understand and comprehend P procedures and methods. Particular attention was focused on the ability of the Job holder to implement new procedures once a basic design was' developed. Education and experience measured the amount of education and experience, either formerly or on the Job, required to perform the Job satisfactorily. - MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOIBES ,.-,,MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA 55 The scope of knowledge within this class was measured In the same manner as in group one. Responsibility, in this class, was measured through three I i factors. Each factor was designed to assess the position's relative worth with respect to the factor in question. Responsibility for Accuracy measured the responsibility for accuracy of work prepared ano the impact errors could have on policies and programs. It assessed each position's relationship i ^� to data requiring q g precise translation. Credit was assigned for the transmission of accurate data through internal and external sources. � f I JResponsibility for Confidential Data measured the amount of access a job has to confidential data, the possible results of a breach of confidentiality and the impact it could have on an I y individual, the City or the community as a whole. i Mental and Visual Attention and Surroundings were measured in the .-. i same manner as in group one positions. B. Classification Results s The positions bench marked and analyzed in this class were: Word Processing Operator, Account Clerk, Senior Clerk Typist, MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB I CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES I ;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA i 56 Secretary I and Senior Account Clerk. The evaluation of each _ position is represented on the following Individual forms. Each bench marked position was evaluated based on the aforementioned factors. The results of that evaluation are as follows: r MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES DOIMEs a ;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA rn 57 JOil t VAI IIA I ION I y/!1 130511 ION: Account Clerk DA I E: CLASSIFICATION: OFFICE & CLERICAL WORKERS RANGE: EVALUATION COMPONENTS KNOWLEDGE This factor considers the knowledge, experience and education the worker must have to perform the job satisfactorily. It is measured by the complexity of practical knowledge the worker must possess, whether it be gained by on the job experience prior to earning an education or both. It is limited to the nature of instructions received regarding work task or by the amount of supervision received. 1. Job Knowledge Point a. Knowledge of Methods & Procedures Range The ability to fully understand and 1-18 comprehend procedures and methods developed in the execution of duties, and the implementation of new procedures and new duties. b. Knowledge of Equipment 1-11 The type of machine to be oeprated, care of the equipment, maintenance and adjustments of equipment when necessary. Preventive maintenance. C. Education & Experience 1-16 Amount of education and experience, either formally or on the job, required to perform the job satis- factorily. Maximum Total Points: 45 Maximum Assigned Points: 24 FACTOR DEGREES: Scope of knowledge required is measured in three degrees: 1) casual - incidental or casual knowl- edge and little or no experience; 2) working - general or workable knowledge with average skill and some experience; 3) expert - exceptional knowledge and skill and considerable training and experience in this area. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOINES Total Points I .;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB • CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MONIES 58 KNOWLEDGE OF: Point Spread 1-18 a. Methods and Procedures Working Casual — Expert 1. Simple work. 1-6 7-12 13-18 2. Routine common methods with 10 little or no supervision. 3. Complicated methods requir- ing independent judgement. 4. Very complicated methods whose operation affects entire department. Point Spread 1-11 Casual Working Expert b. Equipment 1. Basic, simple equipment 1 3 4-7 8-11 requiring very little skill or training. I 2. Ordinary to semi -complex 7 equipment requiring some skill and training. 3. Complex to very complex — equipment requiring a high I degree of experience and i training. 4. Very complicated methods and equipment operation proce- dures requiring a number of years of experience and training, Point Spread 1-16 Education and Experience Working Casual --= Expert C. Amount of 1. Basic high school education. 1-5 6-10 11-16 No additional training or experience required. 7 2. High school training plus additional on-the-job experience required. 3. College with no experience or training required. 4. College with additional on-— the-job training and experi- ence required. 5. Graduate from college plus _ additional and extensive training or experience. 6. Graduate from college with no training and experience. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MONIES 9 `MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA 1 � Ila RESPONSIBILITY 2. Responsibility for Accuracy This factor measures the responsbilily which goes with the job for accuracy of work pre- pared. Credit is based on the relative degree If impact an inaccurate statement or piece of written correspondence can have on the City image insofar as the public is concerned. The measurement is based only on the ability to translate written and verbal communications into an accurate finished product. FACTOOE=ES: a• Inaccurate work unlikely to have any impact on the public. b. Inaccurate work likely to have minimal effect on the public. -- G. Inaccurate work likely to have sub- stantial impact on the public and City image. d• Inaccurate work likely to have catastrophic impact on City image 10 and the public. Maximum Total Points: 72 Maximum Assigned Points: ID RESPONSIBILITY 3. Responsibility for Contacts This factor measures the courtesy, tact and persuasiveness required to maintain good relationships with people at all levels within the organization and to Induce cooperation by personal or tele- phone communications with persons other than immediate supervisors or co-workers. FACTODE= a• Little if any public contact or Point Total S read Points 0-12 10 0 1-4 5-9 10-12 Point Total Spread Points 0-10 7 nter-departmental interaction. b• Handles 0 general public and inter- departmental interaction occasionally 1-2 only. C. Comes in contact with general public 1 continuously. d• All contacts Internally and with the 3-7 general public are part of the job functions. B-10 MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES a i i j I i i i +i (i i j i r ,-IMICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA I i� 60 Maximum Total Points: 10 Maximum Assigned Points: 7 RESPONSIBILITY 4. Responsibility for Confidential Data fhis factor measures the amount of access a job has to confidential data, the possible results of a breach of this confidentiality and the impact it could have on an individual, the City or the community as a whole. FACTOR DEGREES: a. No contact with confidential data at anytime. b. Some contact with confidential data _ under close observation and super- vision. C. Complete and total access to data _ that could be damaging to other employees. d. Complete and total access to data that could be damaging to people and _ City operations. e. Complete and total access that could be damaging to people, City operations _ and the entire community as a whole. Maximum Total Points: 15 Maximum Assigned Points: 3 5. Working Conditions and Hazards This factor appraises the hazards of both accident and health connected with and surrounding the job even though all safety devices have been installed. Consider the material being handled, the machines to be used, work positions, the possibility of accident even though none has occurred and the possible seriousness of the injury. Where the job has several different hazards, consider the greatest of these hazards from the standpoint of time exposed or the probability and severity of injury. FACTOR DEGREES: a. Accident or health hazards absent or negligible. HICROFILMEO BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES Point Spread 0-15 Point Spread 0-5 C Total Points 3 Total Points I ,MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA 1 NICROFILMEO BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DCS MOIRES i� 61 b• Accidents improbable outside of minor _ injuries such as abrasions, Cuts, —L I bruises or burns. Health hazards are negligible. - C. Exposure to lost time accidents such as crushed hand or fool, loss of 2 i fingers, eye injury, etc. Some exposure to occupational diseases not incapaci- tating in nature. d. Exposure to incapacitating accidents or health hazards. 3-4 e. Exposure to accidents or occupational disease which may result in total S i disability or death. r Maximum Total Points: S Maximum Assigned Points: 1 V 6, Mental and Visual Attention Point Total 1 Spread Points Phis tactor considers the concentration and alert- ness, 0 B both mental and visual, required by a job. It is 5 measured by the type of work or problems encountered. It is limited by the frequency of _! occurrence of problems and the alertness and concentration necessary for the solution of these problems. Consideration should also be given to the variety of work, amount and complexity of Planning or inspection and the coordination of visual attention with manual dexterity. FACTOR DEGREES: �i a. Little mental and intermittent !.: visual attention. Work of a most '— 0 simple sort requiring no close or 2 ! sustained attention. �. b, Ordinary mental and visual attention. Work where irregularities or difficul. I -p ties are fairly infrequent or minor in effect. •' C. Frequent mental or visual attention. 5 Work involves some likelihood of -- 3-5 �' irregularity or difficulty. n: d. Continuous mental and visual attention. Operation required constant 6-7 alertness. e, Concentrated mental and I visual atten- tion, Work involves planning and laying B out complex work. ti NICROFILMEO BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DCS MOIRES S I r ;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA 62 Maximum total Poiuls: B Maximum Assigned Points: 5 Point Total /. Surroundings Spread Points Ihis factor is a measure of the disagreeable features 0-4 4 of a job. The features to be considered are those which affect the physical senses and cause discomfort to the employees. Typical causes of discomfort are dirt, fumes, odors, heat, cold, dampness, dust, glare, vibration, noise, inadequate lighting, poor ventilation. Consider also the relative amount and continuity of exposure to these conditions which make the job undesirable. FACTOR DEGREES: n. PleasantSurroundingswith no objet- 0 tionable features. I), Fair conditions or rare exposure to 1 disagreeable elements. C. Occasional exposure to disagreeable 2 elements. d. Frequent exposure to one particularly 3 disagreeable element or continuous exposure to several. 4 e. Continuous exposure to extremely 4 disagreeable elements. Maximum Total Points: 4 Maximum Assigned Points: I TOTAL POINTS ASSIGNED - ALL CATEGORIES: 51 MAXIMUM TOTAL POINTS - ALL CATEGORIES: 100 MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOINES ;,MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA 1 63 JOB I VAI IJA I ION I y/9 I>OSIIION: Sr. Clerk Typist UAIE: CLASSIFICATION: OFFICE & CLERICAL WORKERS RANGE: EVALUATION COMPONENTS KNOWLEDGE This factor considers the knowledge, experience and education the worker must have to perform the job satisfactorily. It is measured by the complexity of practical knowledge the worker must possess, whether it be gained by on the job experience prior to earning an education or both. It is limited to the nature of instructions received regarding work task or by the amount of supervision received. I I. Job Knowledge Point a. Knowledge of Methods & Procedures Range The ability to fully understand and 1-18 --� comprehend procedures and methods developed in the execution of duties, and the implementation of new procedures iI and new duties. II i b. Knowledge of Equipment 1-11 The type of machine to be oeprated, care of the equipment, maintenance and adjustments of equipment when + necessary. Preventive maintenance. 1 C. Education & Experience 1-16 I Amount of education and experience, I either formally or on the job, required to perform the job satis- factorily. l ae Maximum Total Points: qS f Maximum Assigned Points: 30 .. FACTOR Scope of knowledge required is measured in three degrees: 1) casual - incidental or casual knowl- edge and little or no experience; 2) working - general or workable knowledge with average skill and some experience; 3) expert - exceptional knowledge and skill and considerable training and experience in this area. i MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES Total Points i i + i I i i i i i + C I i I i I i I I 1-18 I ;,MICROFILMED BY DORM MICROLAB + 64 • CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA KNOWLEDGE OF: Point Spread 1-18 a. Methods and Procedures Casual Working Expert -- 1. Simple work. 1-6 7-12 13-18 2. Routine common methods with little or no supervision. 3. Complicated methods requir- 13 ing independent judgement. 4. Very complicated methods _ whose operation affects entire department. Point Spread 1-11 b. Equipment Casual Working Expert 1. Basic, simple equipment 1-3 4-7 8-11 requiring very little skill or training. 2. Ordinary to semi -complex 7 equipment requirinS some skill and training. 3. Complex to very complex _ equipment requiring a high degree of experience and i training. 4. Very complicated methods and _ equipment operation proce- dures requiring a number of years of experience and *training. Point Spread 1-16 c. Amount of Education and Experience Casual Working Expert 1. Basic high school education. 1-5 6-10 11-16 No additional training or �+ experience required. 10 2. High school training plus _ additional on-the-job experience required. 3. College with no experience or training required. 4. College with additional on- _ the -job training and experi- ence required. S. Graduate from college plus additional and extensive training or experience. 6. Graduate from college with ` no training and experience. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES ;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOVIES 65 . RESPONSIBILITY - 2. Responsibility for Accuracy Point Total Spread Points This factor measures the responsbilily which 0-12 goes with the job for accuracy of work pre- _9 pared. Credit is based on the relative degree - of impact an inaccurate statement or piece of.written correspondence can have on the City image insofar as the public is concerned. The measurement is based only on the ability to translate written and verbal communications into an accurate finished product. FACTOR DEGREES: a. Inaccurate work unlikely to have any 0 impact on the public. b. Inaccurate work likely to have minimal 1-4 effect on the public. C. Inaccurate work likely to have sub- 5-9 _9 stantial impact on the public and City image. j d. Inaccurate work likely to have 10-12 catastrophic impact on City image and the public. I � Maximum Total Points: 12 PPP N. Maximum Assigned Points: 9 RESPONSIBILITY t �! �. I 3. Responsibility for Contacts Point Total Spread Points ,q This factor measures the courtesy, tact 0-10 0 i' and persuasiveness required to maintain good relationships with people at all IA ? levels within the organization and to Induce cooperation by personal or tele - Phone communications with persons other than immediate supervisors or co-workers. FACTOR DEGREES ii l! `j a. Little if any public contact or inter 0 -departmental interaction. k b. Handles general public and inter- 1-2 departmental interaction occasionally only. C. Comes in contact with general public 3-7 1 continuously. d. All contacts internally and with the B 8-10 general public are part of the job i functions. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOVIES ;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA I i 66 Maximum Total Points: 10 Maximum Assigned Points: 8 RESPONSIBILITY 4. Responsibility for Confidential Data This factor measures the amount of access a job has to confidential data, the possible results of a breach of this confidentiality and the impact it could have on an individual, the City or the community as a whole. FACTO—EES: a. No contact with confidential data at anytime. b. Some contact with confidential data under close observation and super- vision. C. Complete and total access to data that could be damaging to other employees. d. Complete and total access to data 12 that could be damaging to people and — City operations. e• Complete and total access that could be damaging to people, City operations — and the entire community as a whole. Maximum Total Points: 15 Maximum Assigned Points: 12 Point Total Spread Points 0-15 12 0 1-4 5-8 9-13 14-15 5• Working Conditions and Hazards Point TotalSp read Points j This factor appraises the hazards of both accident and health connected 0-5 0 with and surrounding the job even though all safety devices have been installed. I' Consider the material being handled, the machines to be used, work positions, the possibility of accident even though none has occurred and the Possible seriousness of the injury. Where the job has several different hazards, consider the greatest of these hazards from the standpoint of time exposed or the probability and severity injury. of FACTOR a• Accident or health hazards absent 0 or negligible. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES I10JDrS .-MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA I 67 b. Accidents improbable outside of minor injuries such as abrasions, cuts, bruises or burns. Health hazards are negligible. C. Exposure to lost Lime accidents such as crushed hand or fool, loss of fingers, eye injury, etc. Some exposure to occupational diseases not incapaci- tating in nature. d. Exposure to incapacitating accidents or health hazards. e. Exposure to accidents or occupational disease which may result in total disability or death. Maximum Total Points: 5 Maximum Assigned Points: 0 6. Mental and Visual Attention This factor considers the concentration and alert- ness, both mental and visual, required by a job. It is measured by the type of work or problems encountered. It is limited by the frequency of occurrence of problems and the alertness and concentration necessary for the solution of these problems. Consideration should also be given to the variety of work, amount and complexity of planning or inspection and the coordination of visual attention with manual dexterity. FACTOR DEGREES: a. Little mental and intermittent visual attention. Work of a most simple sort requiring no close or sustained attention. b. Ordinary mental and visual attention. _ Work where irregularities or difficul- ties are fairly infrequent or minor in effect. 5 C. Frequent mental or visual attention. Work involves some likelihood of ,irregularity or difficulty. d. Continuous mental and visual attention. Operation required constant alertness. e. Concentrated mental and visual atten- tion. Work involves planning and laying out complex work. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOINES 1 2 3-4 5 Point Spread 0-8 0 1-2 3-5 6-1 8 Total Points 5 t ;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA 4 68 Maximum total Points: B Maximum Assigned Points: _5 _i Point /. Surroundings ( f p 0-4 of a job. The features to be considered are those which affect the physical senses and cause discomfort j: dirt, fumes, odors, heat, cold, dampness, dust, glare, i vibration, noise, inadequate lighting, poor ventilation. di i I i exposure to these conditions which make the job undesirable. 1 t ;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA 4 68 Maximum total Points: B Maximum Assigned Points: _5 Point /. Surroundings Spread Ihis factor is a measure of the disagreeable features 0-4 of a job. The features to be considered are those which affect the physical senses and cause discomfort to the employees. Typical causes of discomfort are dirt, fumes, odors, heat, cold, dampness, dust, glare, vibration, noise, inadequate lighting, poor ventilation. Consider also the relative amount and continuity of exposure to these conditions which make the job undesirable. FACTOR DEGREES: ,,. Pleasant surroundings with no objet- 0 tionable Iealures. I,. fair conditions or rare exposure to 1 disagreeable elements. C. Occasional exposure to disagreeable 2 elements. d. Frequent exposure to one particularly 3 disagreeable element or continuous exposure to several. e. Continuous exposure to extremely 4 disagreeable elements. Maximum Total Points: 4 Maximum Assigned Points: D TOTAL POINTS ASSIGNED - ALL CATEGORIES: 64 MAXIMUM TOTAL POINTS - ALL CATEGORIES: 100 MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOINES Total Points 0 -hIICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA f°`1 NE JOB L VAI IIA I ION I Y/9 POSI1 ION: _Word Processing Ooera or DA f E: CLASSIFICATION: OFFICE & CLERICAL. WORKERS RANGE: EVALUATION COMPONENTS KNOWLEDGE This factor considers the knowledge, experience and education the worker must have to perform the job satisfactorily. It is measured by the complexity of practical knowledge the worker must possess, whether it be gained by on the job experience prior to earning an education or both. It is limited to the nature of instructions received regarding work task or by the amount of supervision received. 'I. Job Knowledge Point a. Knowledge of Methods & Procedures Range The ability to fully understand and 1-18 comprehend procedures and methods developed in the execution of duties, and the implementation of new procedures and new duties. b. Knowledge of Equipment 1-11 The type of machine to be oeprated, care of the equipment, maintenance and adjustments of equipment when necessary. Preventive maintenance, C. Education & Experience 1-16 Amount of education and experience, either formally or on the job, required to perform the job satis- factorily. Maximum Total Points: 45 Maximum Assigned Points: 29 FACTOR DEGREES: Scope of knowledge required is measured in three degrees: 1) casual - incidental or casual knowl- edge and little or no experience; 2) working - general or workable knowledge with average skill and some experience; 3) expert - exceptional knowledge and skill and considerable training and experience in this area, MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 1101HES Total Points r ;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA �1 70 KNOWLEDGE OF: a. Methods and Procedures 1. Simple work. 2. Routine common methods with 9 little or no supervision. 3. Complicated methods requir- ing independent judgement. 4. Very complicated methods whose operation affects entire department. b. Equipment 1. Basic, simple equipment requiring very little skill or training. 2. Ordinary to semi -complex equipment requiring some skill and training. 3. Complex to very complex 10 equipment requiring a high degree of experience and training. 4. Very complicated methods and equipment operation proce- dures requiring a number of years of experience and training. C. Amount of Education and Experience 1. Basic high school education. No additional training or experience required. 2. High school training plus 10 additional on-the-job experience required. 3. College with no experience or training required. 4. College with additional on- the-job training and experi- ence required. 5. Graduate from college plus additional and extensive training or experience. 6. Graduate from college with no training and experience. Point Spread 1-18 Casual Working Expert 1-6 7-12 13-18 Point Spread 1-11 Casual Working Expert 1-3 4-7 8-11 Point Spread 1-16 Casual Working Exper 1-5 6-10 11-16 MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOINES (MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA 71 RESPONSIBILITY Point Total 2. Responsibility for Accuracy Spread Points This factor measures the responsibility which 0-12 9 — goes with the job for accuracy of work pre pared. Credit is based on the relative degree of impact an inaccurate statement or piece of written correspondence can have on the City image insofar as the public is concerned. The measurement is based only on the ability -: to translate written and verbal communications into an accurate finished product. FACTOR DEGREES: a. Inaccurate work unlikely to have any 0 impact on the public. b. Inaccurate work likely to have minimal 1-4 effect on the public. 9 I C. Inaccurate work likely to have sub- 5-9 III stantial impact on the public and d. City image. Inaccurate work likely to have 10 12 catastrophic impact on City image and the public. J I Maximum Total Points: 12 Maximum Assigned Points: 9 RESPONSIBILITY Point Total .i 3. Responsibility for Contacts Spread Points -� This factor measures the courtesy, tact 0-10 2 and persuasiveness required to maintain M good relationships with people at all levels within the organization and to 7 ! i induce cooperation by personal or tele- phone communications with persons other than Immediate supervisors or co-workers. i FACTOR DEGREES I� r a. Little if any public contact or 0 M inter -departmental interaction. b. Handles general public and inter- 2 -C- 1-2 departmental interaction occasionally only. C. Comes in contact with general public 3-7 continuously. d. All contacts internally and with the 8-10 general public are part of the job functions. i I HICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 110IRES -IIIICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB • CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA 72 Maximum Total Points: 10 Maximum Assigned Points: 2 RESPONSIBILITY 4. Responsibility for Confidential Data PoinSpre S read Total Points This factor measures the amount of access 0-15 12 a job has to confidential data, the possible results of a breach of this confidentiality and the impact it could have on an individual, the City or the community as a whole. FACTOR DEGREES: 1 a. No contact with confidential data at 0 r anytime. b. Some contact with confidential data 1-4 under close observation and super- vision. C. Complete and total access to data 5-8 that could be damaging to other employees. d. Complete and total access to data 12 9-13 that could be damaging to people and City operations. e. Complete and total access that could 14-15 be damaging to people, City operations and the entire community as a whole. i Maximum Total Points: 15 I Maximum Assigned Points: 12 i S. Working Conditions and Hazards � Point Spread Total Points j This factor appraises the hazards of both accident 0-5 0 and health connected with and surrounding the job even though all safety devices have been installed. iConsider the material being handled, the machines to be used, work positions, the possibility of accident even though none has occurred and the Possible seriousness of the injury. Where the job has several different hazards, consider the greatest of these hazards from the standpoint of time !! exposed or the probability and severity of injury. I FACTO_ RHES: a. Accident or health hazards absent 0 0 or negligible. i i i I tIICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB + CEDAR RAPIDS -DES IIOIIIES Ilk I ;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA id f[13 b. Accidents improbable outside of minor _ injuries such as abrasions, cuts, bruises or burns. Health hazards are negligible. C. Exposure to lost lime accidents Such _ as crushed hand or fool, loss of fingers, eye injury, etc. Some exposure to occupational diseases not incapaci- tating in nature. d. Exposure to incapacitating accidents or health hazards. e. Exposure to accidents or occupational _ disease which may result in total disability or death. Maximum Total Points: 5 Maximum Assigned Points: 0 6. Mental and Visual Attention Phis tactor considers the concentration and alert- ness, both mental and visual, required by a job. It is measured by the type of work or problems, encountered. It is limited by the frequency of occurrence of problems and the alertness and concentration necessary for the solution of these problems. Consideration should also be given to the variety of work, amount and complexity of planning or inspection and the coordination of visual attention with manual dexterity. FACTOR DEGREES: a. Little mental and Intermittent _ visual attention. Work of a most simple sort requiring no close or sustained attention. b. Ordinary mental and visual attention. _ Work where irregularities or difficul- ties are fairly infrequent or minor in effect. C. Frequent mental or visual attention. _ Work involves some likelihood of irregularity or difficulty. 6 d. Continuous mental and visual attention. _ Operation required constant alertness. e. Concentrated mental and visual atten- tion. Work involves planning and laying out complex work. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES IIOIIIES 1 2 3-4 5 Point Spread 0-B A 1-2 3-5 6-7 8 Total Points _r r ,,MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA I 74 Maximum lotal Points: B Maximum Assigned Points: 6 Point Total Spread Points /. Surroundings Ihis tactor is a measure of the disagreeable features 0-4 1 of a job. The features to be considered are those discomfort which affect the physical senses and cause to the employees. Typical causes of discomfort are dust, glare, dirt, fumes, odors, heat, cold, dampness, vibration, noise, inadequate lighting, poor ventilation. and continuity of Consider also the relative amount these conditions which make the job exposure to undesirable. IACTOR DEGREES: Pleasant surroundings with no objec- 0 ,r. tionable features. 1 b. Fair conditions or rare exposure to disagreeable elements. 2 C. Occasional exposure to disagreeable elements. d. Frequent exposure to one particularly 3 disagreeable element or continuous exposure to several. 4 e. Continuous exposure to extremely disagreeable elements. Maximum Total Points: 4 1 Maximum Assigned Points: TOTAL POINTS ASSIGNED - ALL CATEGORIES: 65 MAXIMUM TOTAL POINTS - ALL CATEGORIES: 100 MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOVIES 0 ,MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAS CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA 1 N 75 JOB EVALUATION FY79 POSITION: Secretary I DATE: CLASSIFICATION: OFFICE & CLERICAL WORKERS RANGE: EVALUATION COMPONENTS KNOWLEDGE This factor considers the knowledge, experience and education the worker must have to perform the job satisfactorily. It is measured by the complexity of practical knowledge the worker must possess, whether it be gained by on the job experience prior to earning an education or both. It is limited to the nature of instructions received regarding work task or by the amount of supervision received. 1. Job Knowledge Point a. Knowledge of Methods & Procedures Range The ability to fully understand and 1-18 comprehend procedures and methods developed in the execution of duties, and the implementation of new procedures and new duties. b. Knowledge of Equipment 1-11 The type of machine to be oeprated, care of the equipment, maintenance and adjustments of equipment when necessary. Preventive maintenance. C. Education & Experience 1-16 Amount of education and experience, either formally or on the job, required to perform the job satis- factorily. atis- factoriIy. Maximum Total Points: 45 Maximum Assigned Points: 34 FACTOR DEGREES: Scope of knowledge required is measured in three degrees: 1) casual - incidental or casual knowl- edge and little. or no experience; 2) working - general or workable knowledge with average skill and some experience; 3) expert - exceptional knowledge and skill and considerable training and experience in this area. IIICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOVIES Total Points r ;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB i 76 • CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA KNOWLEDGE OF: a. Methods and Procedures Point Spread 1-18 Casual Working Expert 1. Simple work. 2. Routine common methods with 1-6 7-12 13-18 little or no supervision. 3. Complicated methods requir- ing Independent judgement. 4. Very complicated methods 1 _ whose operation affects entire department. b. Equipment Point Spread 1-11 Casual Working Expert 1. Basic, simple equipment 1-3 4-7 8-11 requiring very little skill or training. 2. Ordinary to semi -complex equipment requiring some skill and training. 3. Complex to very complex 8 equipment requiring a high degree of experience and training. 4. Very complicated methods and equipment operation proce- dures requiring a number of years of experience and training. C. Amount of Education and Experience Point Spread 1-16 Casual Working Expert 1. Basic high school education. No additional training or 1-5 6-10 11-16 experience required. 2. High school training plus 10 additional on-the-job experience required. 3. College with no experience or training required. 4. College with additional on- the-job training and experi- ence required. 5. Graduate from college plus 10-11 additional and extensive training or experience. 6. Graduate from college with 12-16 no training and experience. — MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES 1 ;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB rri • CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA RESPONSIBILITY 2. Responsibility for Accuracy This factor measures the responsbility which goes with the job for accuracy of work pre- pared. Credit is based on the relative degree of impact an inaccurate statement or piece of written correspondence can have on the City image insofar as the public is concerned. The measurement is based only on the ability to translate written and verbal communications into an accurate finished product. FACTOR DEGREES: a. Inaccurate work unlikely to have any impact on the public. b. Inaccurate work likely to have minimal _ effect on the public. C. Inaccurate work likely to have sub- _ stantial impact on the public and City image. d. Inaccurate work likely to have _ catastrophic impact on City image and the public. Maximum Total Points: 12 Maximum Assigned Points: 1 RESPONSIBILITY 3. Responsibility for Contacts This factor measures the courtesy, tact and persuasiveness required to maintain good relationships with people at all levels within the organization and to induce cooperation by personal or tele- phone communications with persons other than immediate supervisors or co-workers. FACTOR DEGREES a. Little if any public contact or inter -departmental interaction. b. Handles general public and inter- _ departmental interaction occasionally only. C. Comes in contact with general public _ continuously. d. All contacts internally and with the 10 general public are part of the job functions. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES IIDINES Point Spread 0-12 0 1-4 5-9 10-12 Point Spread 0-10 0 1-2 3.7 8-10 Total Points 10 Total Points 10 ,MICROFILMED BY DORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA 78 i Maximum Total Points: 10 Maximum Assigned Points: 10 RESPONSIBILITY 4. Responsibility for Confidential Data Point Spread Total Points This factor measures the amount of access 0-15_ a job has to confidential data, the possible results of a breach of this confidentiality and the impact it could have on an individual, the City or the community as a whole. FACTOR DEGREES: a. No contact with confidential data at 0 anytime. b. Some contact with confidential data 1-4 under close observation and super- vision. C. Complete and total access to data 5-8 d, that could be damaging to other } employees. i d. Complete and total access to data 13 9-13 .. j that could be damaging to people and E"' l City operations. e. Complete and total access that could 14-15 " be damaging to people, City operations td and the entire community as a whole. I Maximum Total Points: 15 i I Maximum Assigned Points: 13 ' I 5. Working Conditions and Hazards g Point Spread Total "" Points This factor appraises the hazards of both accident 0-5 0 _ f and health connected with and surrounding the job even though all safety devices have been installed. Consider the material being handled, the machines i to be used, work positions, the possibility of accident even though none has occurred and the possible seriousness of the injury. Where the job has several different hazards, consider the greatest — j of these hazards from the standpoint of time i; exposed or the probability and severity of injury. FACTOR DEGREES: a. Accident or health hazards absent 0 or negligible. I I j n I 1 I '. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB ... CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOINES ,MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAS CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA FC] b. Accidents improbable outside of minor _ injuries such as abrasions, cuts, bruises or burns. Health hazards are negligible. C. Exposure to lost time accidents such as crushed hand or foot, loss of fingers, eye injury, etc. Some exposure to occupational diseases not incapaci- tating in nature. d. Exposure to incapacitating accidents or _ health hazards. e. Exposure to accidents or occupational _ disease which may result in total disability or death. Maximum Total Points: 5 Maximum Assigned Points: 0 6. Mental and Visual Attention This factor considers the concentration and alert- ness, both mental and visual, required by a job. It is measured by the type of work or problems encountered. It is limited by the frequency of occurrence of problems and the alertness and concentration necessary for the solution of these problems. Consideration should also be given to the variety of work, amount and complexity of planning or inspection and the coordination of visual attention with manual dexterity. FACTOR DEGREES: a. Little mental and intermittent _ •visual attention.' Work of a most simple sort requiring no close or sustained attention. b. Ordinary mental and visual attention.. Work where irregularities or difficul- ties are fairly infrequent or minor in effect. C. Frequent mental or visual attention. _ Work involves some likelihood of irregularity or difficulty. d. Continuous mental and visual attention. _ Operation required constant alertness. e. Concentrated mental and visual atten- tion. Work involves planning and laying out complex work. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES IIOIREs 1 E 3-4 5 Point Spread 0-8 n 1-2 3-5 6-7 8 Total Points _3_ V` i f Maximum Total Points: 8 i Maximum Assigned Points: 3 f i i 7. Surroundings Spread I I i i ; I II I i I i 1 i I i I i I ;•MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA I i�) 80 Maximum Total Points: 8 Maximum Assigned Points: 3 Point 7. Surroundings Spread This factor is a measure of the disagreeable features 0-4 of a job. The features to be considered are those which affect the physical senses and cause discomfort to the employees. Typical causes of discomfort are dirt, fumes, odors, heat, cold, dampness, dust, glare, vibration, noise, inadequate lighting, poor ventilation. Consider also the relative amount and continuity of exposure to these conditions which make the job undesirable. FACTOR DEGREES: a. Pleasant surroundings with no objec- 0 tionable features. b. Fair conditions or rare exposure to 1 disagreeable elements. C. Occasional exposure to disagreeable 2 elements, d. Frequent exposure to one particularly 3 disagreeable element or continuous exposure to several. e. Continuous exposure to extremely 4 disagreeable elements. Maximum Total Points: 4 Maximum Assigned Points: I TOTAL POINTS ASSIGNED - ALL CATEGORIES: 69 MAXIMUM TOTAL POINTS - ALL CATEGORIES: 100 01;z-- .­­ I MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES Total Points 1_ ;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA i - 10 8]. JOB LVAIIIAI ION I Y PI POS IIION: Sr. Account Clerk DAIE: 5/25/79 — CLASSIFICATION: OFFICE & CLERICAL WORKERS RANGE: 6 EVALUATION COMPONENTS KNOWLEDGE This factor considers the knowledge, experience and education the worker must have to perform the job satisfactorily. It is measured by the complexity ^ of practical knowledge the worker must possess, whether it be gained by on the job experience prior to earning an education or both. It is limited to the nature of instructions received regarding work rj task or by the amount of supervision received. ' I. Job Knowledge Point Total - a. Knowledge of Methods & Procedures Range Points The ability to fully understand and 1-18 comprehend procedures and methods developed in the execution of duties, and the implementation of new procedures + and new duties. b. Knowledge of Equipment 1-11 —i The type of machine to be oeprated, care of the equipment, maintenance and adjustments of equipment when I ! necessary. Preventive maintenance. C. Education & Experience 1-16 I Amount of education and experience, i either formally or on the job, i required to perform the job satis- factorily. {. Maximum Total Points: 45 II I Maximum Assigned Points: 32 l' FACTOR DEGREES: Scope of knowledge required is measured in three degrees: 1) casual - Incidental or casual knowl- edge and little or no experience; 2) working - general or workable knowledge with average skill and some experience; 3) expert - exceptional knowledge and skill and considerable training i i i I and experience in this area. I I MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS - DES MOINES ;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA 1 82 KNOWLEDGE OF: a. Methods and Procedures 1. Simple work. 2. Routine common methods with _ little or no supervision. 3. Complicated methods requir- ing independent judgement. 4. Very complicated methods 14 whose operation affects entire department. b. Equipment 1. Basic, simple equipment _ requiring very little skill or training. 2. Ordinary to semi -complex _ equipment requiring some skill and training. 3. Complex to very complex 8 equipment requiring a high degree of experience and training. 4. Very complicated methods and _ equipment operation proce- dures requiring a number of years of experience and training. C. Amount of Education and Experience I. Basic high school education. _ No additional training or experience required. 2. High school training plus 10 additional on-the-job experience required. 3. College with no experience or training required. 4. College with additional on- _ the -job training and experi- ence required. 5. Graduate from college plus _ additional and extensive training or experience, 6. Graduate from college with _ no training and experience. Point Spread 1-18 Casual Working Expert 1-6 7-12 13-18 Point Spread 1-11 Casual Working Expert 1-3 4-7 8-11 Point Spread 1-16 Casual Working Expert 1-5 6-10 11-16 ' I i I MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES r ,•MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA 83 RESPONSIBILITY 2. Responsibility for Accuracy this factor measures the responsbilily which goes with Lhe job for accuracy of work pre- pared. Credit is based on the relative degree of impact an inaccurate statement or piece of written correspondence can have on the City image insofar as the public is concerned. The measurement is based only on the ability to translate written and verbal communications into an accurate finished product. FACTOR DEGREES: a. Inaccurate work unlikely to have any _ impact on the public. b. Inaccurate work likely to have minimal _ effect on the public. C. Inaccurate work likely to have sub- 9 stantial impact on the public and City image. d. Inaccurate work likely to have catastrophic impact on City image and the public. Maximum Total Points: 12 Maximum Assigned Points: 9 RESPONSIBILITY 3. Responsibility for Contacts This factor measures the courtesy, tact and persuasiveness required to maintain good relationships with people at all levels within the organization and to induce cooperation by personal or tele- phone communications with persons other than immediate supervisors or co-workers. FACTOR DEGREES a. Little if any public contact or inter -departmental interaction. b. Handles general public and inter- departmental interaction occasionally only. C. Comes in contact with general public continuously. d. All contacts internally and with the 10 general public are part of the job functions. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES HOMES Point Spread 0-12 0 1-A 5-9 10-12 Point Spread 0-10 0 1-2 3-7 8-10 Total Points _9 Total Points 10 I ,MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAS CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA 1 ' 84 Maximum Total Points: 10 Maximum Assigned Points: 10 RESPONSIBILITY 4. Responsibility for Confidential Data This factor measures the amount of access a job has to confidential data, the possible results of a breach of this confidentiality and the impact it could have on an individual, the City or the community as a whole. FACTOR DEGREES: a. No contact with confidential data at _ anytime. b. Some contact with confidential data _ under close observation and super- vision. C. Complete and total access to data that could be damaging to other employees. d. Complete and total access to data 13 that could be damaging to people and City operations. e. Complete and total access that could be damaging to people, City operations and the entire community as a whole. Maximum Total Points: 15 Maximum Assigned Points: 13 5. Working Conditions and Hazards This factor appraises the hazards of both accident and health connected with and surrounding the job even though all safety devices have been Installed. Consider the material being handled, the machines to be used, work positions, the possibility of accident even though none has occurred and the possible seriousness of the injury. Where the job has several different hazards, consider the greatest of these hazards from the standpoint of time exposed or the probability and severity of injury. FACTOR DEGREES: a. Accident or health hazards absent _ or negligible. Point Spread 0-15 0 1-4 5-8 9-13 14-15 Point Spread 0-5 MICRONVED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES F101tirS 0 Total Points 13 Total Points 0 I j 1 I I �! I I j I I I ,MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAS CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA 1 ' 84 Maximum Total Points: 10 Maximum Assigned Points: 10 RESPONSIBILITY 4. Responsibility for Confidential Data This factor measures the amount of access a job has to confidential data, the possible results of a breach of this confidentiality and the impact it could have on an individual, the City or the community as a whole. FACTOR DEGREES: a. No contact with confidential data at _ anytime. b. Some contact with confidential data _ under close observation and super- vision. C. Complete and total access to data that could be damaging to other employees. d. Complete and total access to data 13 that could be damaging to people and City operations. e. Complete and total access that could be damaging to people, City operations and the entire community as a whole. Maximum Total Points: 15 Maximum Assigned Points: 13 5. Working Conditions and Hazards This factor appraises the hazards of both accident and health connected with and surrounding the job even though all safety devices have been Installed. Consider the material being handled, the machines to be used, work positions, the possibility of accident even though none has occurred and the possible seriousness of the injury. Where the job has several different hazards, consider the greatest of these hazards from the standpoint of time exposed or the probability and severity of injury. FACTOR DEGREES: a. Accident or health hazards absent _ or negligible. Point Spread 0-15 0 1-4 5-8 9-13 14-15 Point Spread 0-5 MICRONVED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES F101tirS 0 Total Points 13 Total Points 0 j ;,MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB i 85 CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES. IOWA b. Accidents improbable outside of minor 1 Spread Points injuries such as abrasions, cuts, 0-8 5 ness, both mental and visual, required by a job. bruises or burns. Health hazards are II is measured by the type of work or problems negligible. C. Exposure to lost lime accidents such 2 as crushed hand or foot, loss of the variety of work, amount and complexity of fingers, eye injury, etc. Some exposure planning or inspection and the coordination of to occupational diseases not incapaci- FACTOR DEGREES: tating in nature. a. Little mental and intermittent d. Exposure to incapacitating accidents or 3-4 simple sort requiring no close or health hazards. sustained attention. e. Exposure to accidents or occupational 5 Work where irregularities or difficul- disease which may result in total ties are fairly infrequent or minor disability or death. C. Frequent mental or visual attention. 5 Maximum Total Points: 5 Work involves some likelihood of Maximum Assigned Points: 0 MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES tt01t1E5 Point Total 6• Mental and Visual Attention Spread Points This factor considers the concentration and alert- 0-8 5 ness, both mental and visual, required by a job. II is measured by the type of work or problems encountered. It is limited by the frequency of occurrence of problems and the alertness and concentration necessary for the solution of these problems. Consideration should also be given to the variety of work, amount and complexity of planning or inspection and the coordination of visual attention with manual dexterity. FACTOR DEGREES: a. Little mental and intermittent 0 visual attention. Work of a most simple sort requiring no close or sustained attention. b. Ordinary mental and visual attention. 1-2 Work where irregularities or difficul- ties are fairly infrequent or minor in effect. C. Frequent mental or visual attention. 5 3-5 Work involves some likelihood of irregularity or difficulty. d. Continuous mental and visual attention. 6-7 Operation required constant alertness. e. Concentrated mental and visual atten- 8 tion. Work involves planning and laying out complex work. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES tt01t1E5 i i i Maximum Assigned Points: 5 I i I, I r j i i i r ;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB t 86 • CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA Maximum lolal Poinls: B Maximum Assigned Points: 5 /. Surroundings Point Total Spread Points This laclor is a measure of the disagreeable features 0-4 1 of a job. The features to be considered are those — — - which affect the physical senses and cause discomfort to the employees. Typical causes of discomfort are dirt, fumes, odors, heat, cold, dampness, dust, glare, — vibration, noise, inadequate lighting, poor ventilation. Consider also the relative amount and continuity of exposure to these conditions which make the job r undesirable, FACTOR DEGREES: a. Pleasant surroundings with no objet- 0 tionable features. — b. Fair conditions or rare exposure to 1 1 disagreeable elements. I C. Occasional exposure to disagreeable p elements. d. Frequent exposure to one particularly 3 disagreeable element or continuous exposure to several. ' e. Continuous exposure to extremely 4 ; disagreeable elements. — Maximum Total Points: 4 Maximum Assigned Points: 1 TOTAL POINTS ASSIGNED - ALL CATEGORIES., 70 i MAXIMUM TOTAL POINTS - ALL CATEGORIES: 100 i MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES ItOltlES i I i I IIr\r — j I _ I I I 1 I I 1 I t I I iI i ! ry I i Maj I � 1 I i. ..r I� t w I li s y it w I I ; l _ / I .'MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA 87 The previous analysis determined the following changes or revisions in the classification system. PIICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES IIORIES ,.;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA 1 1979 JOB EVALUATION BENCH MARK POSITIONS OLD NEW CLASSIFICATION SALARY DATA GRADE POSITION POSITION ASSIGNED POINTS MAX POINTS FROM TO OLD-FROM/TO Office and Clerical 1A Word Processing Same 85 100 43 / 3 670/933 Operator MICROFILMED DY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOIRES 2 Acct. Clerk Same 51 100 2 / 2 749/964 3 Sr. Clerk Admin. 100 3 / 3 670/933 I j Typist Clerk/Typist 64 4 Secretary I Same 88 100 4 / 5 751/1052 m 5 Sr. Acct.CD Admin. Acct. 100 4 / 6 751/1052 Clerk Clerk 70 I i I I 1 y 9 I I MICROFILMED DY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOIRES r ,.IMICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA I ' IIICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAP IDS -DES !ID RIES 89 w ii Group 3: Professional and Technical Employees IS A. The Classification System � I i Evaluations of positions within this classification centered around knowledge, responsibility, mental and visual attention I and working conditions. i Knowledge considered factors similar to the previous two groupings. However, responsibility within this group was to Include expanded responsibility and authority. The ienlarged —� major components of responsibility included direction and I^ instruction of others, confidential data and responsibility for performance. The positions bench marked and evaluated within I this group were: Rehabilitation Finance Specialist, Library Circulation Supervisor and Assistant Superintendent. „i Individual analysis is as follows: I I r 1� 3 3 I I � 1 II IIICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAP IDS -DES !ID RIES ;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA i 90 JOB EVALUTATION FY79 POSITION: Rehab. Finance Specialist DATE: 5/25/79 CLASSIFICATION: PROFESSIONAL $ TECHNICAL RANGE: EVALUATION COMPONENTS KNOWLEDGE. This factor considers the education, knowledge and experience the worker must have to perform the job satisfactorily. It is measured by the complexity of practical knowledge the worker must possess whether it be gained by on-the-job experience, prior training and education or both. It is limited by the nature of instructions received regarding work task and by the amount of supervision received. Point Total 1. Job Knowledge Range Points a. Knowledge of Methods and Procedures 1-12 The ability to fully understand and comprehend procedures and methods developed in the execution of duties, and the Implementation of new procedures and new duties. b. Knowledge of Equipment 1-10 The type of machine to be operated, care of the equipment, maintenance and adjustments of equipment when necessary. Preventive maintenance. C. Education and Experience 1-10 Amount of education and experience, either formally or on the job, required to perform the job satisfactorily. Maximum Total Points: 32 Maximum Assigned Points: 18 FACTOR DEGREES: Scope of knowledge required is measured in three degrees: 1) casual - incidental or casual knowledge and little or no experience; 2) working - general or workable knowledge with average skill and some experience; 3) expert - exceptional knowledge and skill and considerable training and experience In this area. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOINES .MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA r") 91 Knowledge of: A. Methods and Procedures I. Routine methods requiring _ little or nor supervision. 2. Procedures of a semi -complex _ nature requiring precise direction. 3. Complex methods and pro- cedures requiring independent— judgement. ndependentjudgement. 4. Very complex methods and 8 procedures requiring much independent judgement and decision making. Knowledge of: B. Equipment 1. Basic, simple equipment requiring very little skill or training. 2. Ordinary to semi -complex equipment requiring some skill and training. 3. Complex to very complex _ equipment requiring a high degree of experience and training. 4. Very complicated methods and equipment operation procedures requiring a number of years of experience and training. Point Spread 1-12 Casual Working Expert 1-4 5-8 9-12 Point Spread 1-10 Casual Working Expert 1-3 4-7 8-10 C. Education and Experience Point Spread 1-10 P Casual Working Exper 1. Basic high school education. 1-3 4-7 8-10 No additional training or experience required. 2. High school training plus additional on the job experience required. 3. College with no experience or training required. 4. College with additional on- 7 the -Job training and experince required. S. Graduate from college plus additional and extensive training or experience. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 14011JES 1377 .-,MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA 1 MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MONIES 92 6. Graduate from college with _ no training and experience. Maximum Total Points: 32 Maximum Assigned Points: 18 RESPONSIBILITY point Total 2. Responsibility for Equipment Spread Points _ S �--- This factor is a measure of the job's responsibility 0-13 3 for performing work without damaging equipment. It evaluates the responsibility for preventing damage to the equipment due to carelessness or negligence used In the performance of a job. Credit is based on the care necessary to prevent the estimated cost damage and in consideration of of the damage for any one mishap. Auxilliary equipment not actually used by the job should then be taken into consideration if careless actions by in damage to it. The use of the worker may result does not necessarily involve a expensive equipment high degree of responsibility unless, a slight mistake will involve a serious loss of life or property. Point Spread 0-13 �y FACTO_ R_ DEGREES: Use of Equipment a. Little care required. Damage not likely to occur. b. Ordinary care required. Some opportu 3 1-3 nity of damage of small consequence. 4-7 C. Steady care required. Regular opportu-_, nity for but not frequent occurrence of damage. Damage fairly large. 8-11 d. Special care required. Frequent oppor- _, tunity for damage of considerable extent or less frequent opportunity for greater _ damage. e. Sustained, special care required. Con- _ 12-13 tinuous opportunity for damage of serious nature. Maximum Total Points: 13 3 Maximum Assigned Points: RESPONSIBILITY Point Total — Spread Points 3. Responsibility for Direction and _ MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MONIES ;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA 1 MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES 93 f's Instruction of Others 1-12 This factor measures the responsibility which r+ goes with the job for instructing and directing the work of others. It is not intended to appraise supervisor responsibilities for results. W The number of men and women directed shall be a considered as those given immediate guidance and also those directly assisted through any other channels. t FACTOR DEGREES: u a. Responsible only for own work but may 1 I� coordinate work with others. b. Responsible for instructing and direct- 2 p -q i kf Ing one or two helpers 50% or more of the time. It C. Responsible for instructing, directing 5-8 or setting up for a small group of employees ususally in the same occupation -� up to ten persons. d. Responsible for instructing, directing 9-12 I and maintaining the flow of work in a group up to 20 persons. - Maximum Total Points: 12 Maximum Assigned Points: 2 q. Responsibility for Contacts Points Total Spread Points -t This factor measures the courtesy, tact and 0-10 1.0 persuasiveness required to maintain good — relationships with people at all levels within the organization and to induce cooperation by personal or telephone conversations with persons other than immediate supervisors or co-workers. j FACTOR DEGREES: i a. Little if any public contact or inter- 0 departmental interaction. J b. Handles general public and Inter- 1-2 departmental interaction occasionally only. i J c. Comes in contact with general public 3-7 continuously. d. All contacts internally and with the 10 8-10 general public are part of the job function. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES ;,MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA 1 91) Maximum Total Points: 10 Maximum Assigned Points: 10 MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES IIOIIIES Point Total Point Total 5. Responsibility for Confidential Data Spread Points and authority necessary to successfully complete This factor measures the amount of access a Job 0-8 7 has to confidential data, possible results of a granted the position insofar as outcome Is breach of this condfidentiality and the Impact determined. it could have on an individual, the City or the a. Follow established methods and pro- community as a whole. cedures; refer exceptions. FACTOR DEGREES: b. Occasional, since most duties are a. No contact with confidential data at 0 instructions and procedures serve as anytime. guides. Unusual problems are referred, b. Some contact with confidential data 1-3 C. Limited supervision. The nature of under close observation and supervision the work is such that it is performed C. Complete and total access to data that 4-6 could be damaging to other employees. d. Complete and total access to data that 7 7 could be damaging to people and City operations. e. Complete and total access that could 8 be damaging to people, City operations and the entire community as a whole. Maximum Total Points: 8 Maximum Assigned Points: 7 MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES IIOIIIES Point Total 6. Responsibility for Performance Spread Points This factor measures the level of responsibility 1-10 7 and authority necessary to successfully complete the job. Consideration is given to types of parameters expressed and the degree of autonomy granted the position insofar as outcome Is determined. FACTOR DEGREES: a. Follow established methods and pro- 1 cedures; refer exceptions. b. Occasional, since most duties are 2-3 repetitive and related, standard instructions and procedures serve as guides. Unusual problems are referred, frequently with suggestions for correction. C. Limited supervision. The nature of 4-5 the work is such that it is performed to a large extent on own responsibility MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES IIOIIIES R MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB 1 • CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA ' MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES 95 after assignement, with some choice of method. Occasionally develop own methods. d. Broad objectives are Outlined. Work is 7 6-7 judged primarily on overall results with much choice of method. Frequently develop methods to achieve desired results. e. Little or no supervision. Have wide B-10 choice in selection, development and coordination of methods within broad framework of general policies. Maximum Total Points: 10 Maximum Assigned Points: 7 7. Mental and Visual Attention Point Total Spread Points - This factor considers the concentration and 1-5 alertness, both mental and visual, required ,J by a job. It is measured by the type of work or problems encountered. It is limited by the frequency of occurrence of problems and the alertness and concentration necessary for the solution of these problems. Consider- ation should also be given to the variety of s work, amount and complexity of planning or inspection and that coodination of visual _I attention with manual dexterity. J FACTOR DEGREES: -- a. Little mental and Intermittent visual 1 attention. Work requiring no close or sustained attention. -, b. Ordinary mental and visual attention. p Work where irregularities or difficul- ties are fairly infrequent or minor i in effect. 4 ^ C. Frequent mental or visual attention. 3 Work Involves some likelihood of I irregularity or difficulty. d. Continuous mental and visual atten- 4 q tion. Operation required constant alertness. e. Concentrated mental and visual atten- 5 tion. Work involves planning and laying out complex work. IJ Maximum Total Points: 5 MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES .MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA i� 96 Maximum Assigned Points: 11 Point Total 8. Hazards Spread Points This factor appraises the hazards of both ac- 0-6 0 cident and health connected with surrounding the job even though all safety devices have been installed. Consider the material being handled, the machines to be used, work positions, the possibility of accident even though none has occurred and the possible seriousness of the injury. Where the job has several different hazards, consider the greatest of these hazards from the standpoint of time exposed or the probability and severity of injury. FACTOR DEGREES: a. Accident or health hazards absent or 0 negligible. b. Accidents improbable outside of minor 1-3 injuries such as abrasions, cuts, bruises or burns. Health hazards are ^' negligible. ;. C. Exposure to loss time accidents such 4 as crushed hand or foot, loss of .•, fingers, eye injury, etc. Some exposure to occupational diseases not incapacita- ting in nature. d. Exposure to incapacitating accident or 5 health hazards. > e. Exposure to accidents or occupational 6 disease which may result in total disability or death. �. Maximum Total Points: 6 Maximum Assigned Points: 0 Point Total 9. Surroundings Spread Points ti This factor is a measure of the disagreeable 0-4 0 features of a job. The features to be con- sidered are those which affect the physical senses and cause discomfort to the employees. Typical causes of discomfort are dirt, fumes, odors, heat, cold, dampness, dust, glare, vibration, noise, inadequate lighting, poor ventilation. Consider also the relative amount and continuity of exposure to these conditions which make the job undesirable. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES FIOIRES I - i i I L. i I I .. i w J a. ' w � I _r I i ' I I - i i I L. i I ,MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA I ' 97 FACTOR DEGREES: a. Pleasant surroundings with no nhjeC 0 _ lionabie features, b. Fair conditions or rare exposure to _ disagreeable elements. C. Occasional exposure to disagreeable — elements. d. Frequent exposure to one particularly _ disagreeable element or continuous exposure to several. C. Continuous and intensive exposure to extremely hazardous elements. Maximum Total Points: 4 Maximum Assigned Points: 0 TOTAL POINTS ASSIGNED - ALL CATEGORIES: 51 MAXIMUM TOTAL POINTS - ALL CATEGORIES: 100 MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES FIOIr1ES 0 1 2 3 E f ;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA 98 JOB EVALIITATION FY79 POSITION: Library - Circulation Supervisor DATE: 6/1/79 CLASSIFICATION: PROFESSIONAL & TECHNICAL RANGE: EVALUATION COMPONENTS " KNOWLEDGE This factor considers the education, knowledge and experience the worker must have to perform the job satisfactorily. It is measured by the complexity of practical knowledge the worker must possess whether it be gained by on-the-job w experience, prior training and education or both. It is limited by the nature of instructions received regarding work task and by the amount of supervision received. .y Point Total ,. 1. Range Points Job Knowledge a. Knowledge of Methods and Procedures 1'12 12 The ability to fully understand and .- comprehend procedures and methods developed in the execution of duties, and the implementation of new procedures and new duties. 1-10 7 b. Knowledge of Equipment The type of machine to be operated, _ care of the equipment, maintenance and adjustments of equipment when necessary. Preventive maintenance. 1-10 B C. Education and Experience Amountof education and experience, either formally or on the job, required to perform the job satisfactorily. Maximum Total Points: 32 Maximum Assigned Points: 27 FACTOR DEGREES: Scope of knowledge required Is measured In three degrees: 1) casual - incidental or casual knowledge and little or no experience; 2) working general or workable knowledge with average skill and some experience; 3) expert - exceptional knowledge and skill and considerable training and experience In _ this area. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES j ,MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA 1 99 Knowledge of: A. Methods and Procedures 1. Routine methods requiring _ little or nor supervision. 2. Procedures of a semi -complex 12 nature requiring precise direction. 3. Complex methods and pro- cedures requiring independent judgement. 4. Very complex methods and _ procedures requiring much independent judgement and decision making. Knowledge of: B. Equipment 1. Basic, simple equipment requiring very little skill or training. 2. Ordinary to semi -complex 7 equipment requiring some skill and training. 3. Complex to very complex equipment requiring a high degree of experience and training. 4. Very complicated methods and equipment operation procedures requiring a number of years of experience and training. Point Spread 1-12 Casual Working Expert 1-4 5-8 9-12 Point Spread 1-10 Casual Working Expert 1-3 4-7 B-10 Point Spread 1-10 C. Education and Experience Casual Working Expert 1. Basic high school education. — 1-3 4-7 B-10 No additional training or experience required. 2. High school training plus _ additional on the job experience required. 3. College with no experience _ or training required. 4. College with additional on- the-job training and experince required. B 5. Graduate from college plus additional and extensive training or experience. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIOS•DES floltirs i -.;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB I • CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA ' r_ 100 6. Graduate from college with no training and experience. Maximum Total Points: 32 Maximum Assigned Points: 27 RESPONSIBILITY 2. Responsibility for Equipment Point TotalS read Points This factor is a measure of the job's responsibility 0-13 0 for performing work without damaging equipment. It — evaluates the responsibility for preventing damage - 1 due to carelessness or negligence to the equipment j used in the performance of a job. i rrl Credit is based on the care necessary to prevent j damage and in consideration of the estimated cost of the damage for any one mishap. Auxilliary equipment not actually used by the job should then be taken into consideration if careless actions by the worker may result in damage to it. The use of expensive equipment does not necessarily Involve a high degree of responsibility unless, a slight mistake will involve a serious loss of life or property. FACTOR DEGREES: Point Spread 0-13 y Use of Equipment a. Little care required. Damage not 0 ry 0 ` likely to occur. . b. Ordinary care required. Some opportu-_ 1-3 - nity of damage of small consequence. C. Steady care required. Regular opportu-_ 4-7 nity for but not frequent occurrence of damage. Damage fairly large. d. Special care required. Frequent o q PPor- 8-11 tunity'for damage of considerable extent or less frequent opportunity for greater damage. e. Sustained, special care required. Con- 12 13 tinuous opportunity for damage of serious nature. Maximum Total Points: 13 0 Maximum Assigned Points: I r — RESPONSIBILITY Point Total -- 3. Responsibility for Direction and i I � Spread Points I MICROFILMED BY ' JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 1,101NEs 1 -MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA 1 10.1 Instru-Lion of Others I 1-12 This factor measures the responsibility which — goes with the job for instructing and directing ! the work of others. It is not intended to appraise supervisor responsibilities for results. _ The number of men and women directed shall be considered as those given immediate guidance and also those directly assisted through any other channels. FACTOR DEGREES: a. Responsible only for own work but may i 1 coordinate work with others. b. Responsible for instructing and direct- 2-4 ing one or two helpers 50% or more of the time. C. Responsible for instructing, directing g 5-8 or setting up for a small group of 7 employees ususally in the same occupation t 1.4 up to ten persons. d. Responsible for instructing, directing 9-12 .. and maintaining the flow of work in a w group up to 20 persons. i i Maximum Total Points: 12 i Maximum Assigned Points: B 4. Responsibility for Contacts Points Total Spread Points This factor measures the courtesy, tact and 0-10 10 persuasiveness required to maintain good relationships with people at all levels within the organization and to induce cooperation by personal or telephone conversations with persons other than immediate supervisors or co-workers. 1 i FACTOR DEGREES: a a. Little if any public contact or Inter- 0 departmental interaction. b. Handles general public and inter - 1 -2 departmental interaction occasionally Ll only. C. Comes in contact with general public 3-7 continuously. d. All contacts internally and with the 10 B-10 general public are part of the job 1 function. I i i I I IIICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB I CEDAR RAPI05•DCS MOINES MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA I �I 102 Maximum Total Points: 10 Maximum Assigned Points: 10 Total Points 5 Total Points 6 Point S. Responsibility for Confidential Data Spread This factor measures the amount of access a job 0-8 has to confidential data, possible results of a breach of this condfidentiality and the impact it could have on an individual, the City or the icommunity as a whole. FACTOR DEGREES: a. No contact with confidential data at 0 anytime. b. Some contact with confidential data 1-3 under close observation and supervision C; Complete and total access to data that 5 4-6 could be damaging to other employees. d. Complete and total access to data that 7 could be damaging to people and City operations. e. Complete and total access that could 8 be damaging to people, City operations and the entire community as a whole. Maximum Total Points: 8 Maximum Assigned Points: 5 Point j 6. Responsibility for Performance Spread This factor measures the level of responsibility 1-10 and authority necessary to successfully complete the job. Consideration is given to types of parameters expressed and the degree of autonomy granted the position insofar as outcome is determined. FACTOR DEGREES: a. Follow established methods and pro- 1 cedures; refer exceptions. b. Occasional, since most duties are 2-3 repetitive and related, standard instructions and procedures serve as guides. Unusual problems are referred, frequently with suggestions for correction. C. Limited supervision. The nature of 4-5 the work is such that It is performed to a large extent on own responsibility FIICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES 110I0ES Total Points 5 Total Points 6 U ;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA I 103 after assignemenl, with some choice of method. Occasionally develop own methods. d. Broad objectives ar•e outlined. Work is 6 judged primarily on overall results with much choice of method. Frequently develop methods to achieve desired results. e. Little or no supervision. Have wide choice in selection, development and coordination of methods within broad framework of general policies. Maximum Total Points: 10 Maximum Assigned Points: 6 7. Mental and Visual Attention This factor considers the concentration and alertness, both mental and visual, required by a job. It is measured by the type of work or problems encountered. It is limited by the frequency of occurrence of problems and the alertness and concentration necessary for the solution of these problems. Consider- ation should also be given to the variety of work, amount and complexity of planning or inspection and that coodinalion of visual attention with manual dexterity. FACTOR DEGREES: a. Little mental and intermittent visual _ attention. Work requiring no close or sustained attention. b. Ordinary mental and visual attention. 2 Work where irregularities or difficul- ties are fairly infrequent or minor in effect. C. Frequent mental or visual attention. _ Work involves some likelihood of irregularity or difficulty. d. Continuous mental and visual atten- tion. Operation required constant alertness. e. Concentrated mental and visual atten- tion. Work involves planning and laying out complex work. Maximum Total Points: 5 MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES IIOIDES 6-7 8-10 Point Spread 1-5 1 2 3 4 5 Total Points 2 E i ;,MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA i 104 MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOIRES Maximum Assigned Points: 2 8. Hazards Point Total Spread Points This factor appraises the hazards of both ac- 0-6 0 cident and health connected with surrounding the job even though all safety devices have been installed. Consider the material being handled, the machines to be used, work positions, the possibility of accident even though none has occurred and the possible seriousness of the injury. Where the job has several different hazards, consider the greatest of these hazards ~ from the standpoint of time exposed or the probability and severity of injury. FACTOR DEGREES: a. Accident or health hazards absent or 0 0 negligible. — b. Accidents improbable outside of minor 1-3 injuries such as abrasions, cuts, bruises or burns. Health hazards are — negligible. C. Exposure to loss time accidents such q " as crushed hand or foot, loss of fingers, eye injury, etc. Some exposure to occupational diseases not Incapacita- ting in nature. d. Exposure to incapacitating accident or 5 health hazards. e. Exposure to accidents or occupational 6 disease which may result In total disability or death. Maximum Total Points: 6 Maximum Assigned Points: 0 9. Surroundings Point Total Spread Points — This factor is a measure of the disagreeable 0-4 features of a job. The features to be con- 0 — sidered are those which affect the physical senses and cause discomfort to the employees. Typical causes of discomfort are dirt, fumes, odors, heat, cold, dampness, dust, glare, vibration, noise, Inadequate lighting, poor ventilation. Consider also the relative amount and continuity of exposure to these conditions _ which make the job undesirable. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOIRES r MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA 105 FACTOR a. Pleasant surroundings with no objet- 0 tionable features. 0 b. Fair conditions or rare exposure to disagreeable elements. I C. Occasional exposure to disagreeable elements, _ 2 d. Frequent exposure to one particularly disagreeable element or continuous 3 exposure to several. e. Continuous and intensive exposure to 4 extremely hazardous elements. -"— Maximum Total Points: 4 Maximum Assigned Points: 0 MAXIMUM ASSIGNED POINTS - ALL CATEGORIES: 58 MAXIM113Y'lTAL POINTS - ALL CATEGORIES: 100 MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -UES HINES I ;MIGROFILMEO BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA i� 106 JOB EVALt1TATION FY79 POSITION: Assistant Superintendent DATE: 5/25 CLASSIFICATION: PROFESSIONAL & TECHNICAL RANGE: EVALUATION COMPONENTS KNOWLEDGE This factor considers the education, knowledge and experience the worker must have to perform the job satisfactorily. It is measured by the complexity of practical knowledge the worker must possess whether it be gained by on-the-job experience, prior training and education or both. It is limited by the nature of instructions received regarding work task and by the amount of supervision received. Point Total 1. Job Knowledge Range PoinLs a. Knowledge of Methods and Procedures 1-12 The ability to fully understand and comprehend procedures and methods developed in the execution of duties, and the implementation of new procedures and new duties. b. Knowledge of Equipment 1-10 The type of machine to be operated, care of the equipment, maintenance and adjustments of equipment when necessary. Preventive maintenance. C. Education and Experience 1-10 Amount of education and experience, either formally or on the job, required to perform the job satisfactorily. Maximum Total Points: 32 Maximum Assigned Points: 25 FACTOR DEGREES: Scope of knowledge required is measured in three degrees: 1) casual - incidental or casual knowledge and little or no experience; 2) working - general or workable knowledge with average skill and some experience; 3) expert - exceptional knowledge and skill and considerable training and experience in this area. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOVIES .MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA I 107 i r r I_ i i r 1-4 5-8 9-12 A. Methods and Procedures _1 j j rr J nature requiring precise direction. 3. Complex methods and pro- , cedures requiring independent judgement. 4. Very complex methods and 11 procedures requiring much independent judgement and decision making. Point Spread 1-10 I Casual Working Expert I I I 1. Basic, simple equipment _. 1-3 4-7 8-10 requiring very little skill or training. 7 2. Ordinary to semi -complex equipment requiring some skill and training. 3. Complex to very complex equipment requiring a high I I training. 4. Very complicated methods and equipment operation procedures i of experience and training. Point Spread 1-10 Casual working Expert 1 I I 11 1 I I .MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA I MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES IIOIIIES 107 Point Spread 1-12 Casual %Vorkinq Expert Knowledge of: 1-4 5-8 9-12 A. Methods and Procedures 1. Routine methods requiring little or nor supervision. 2. Procedures of a semi -complex _ nature requiring precise direction. 3. Complex methods and pro- cedures requiring independent judgement. 4. Very complex methods and 11 procedures requiring much independent judgement and decision making. Point Spread 1-10 Knowledge of: Casual Working Expert B. Equipment 1. Basic, simple equipment _. 1-3 4-7 8-10 requiring very little skill or training. 7 2. Ordinary to semi -complex equipment requiring some skill and training. 3. Complex to very complex equipment requiring a high degree of experience and training. 4. Very complicated methods and equipment operation procedures requiring a number of years of experience and training. Point Spread 1-10 Casual working Expert C. Education and Experience 1. Basic high school education. _ 1-3 4-7 8-10 No additional training or experience required. 7 2. High school training plus additional on the job experience required. 3. College with no experience or training required. 4. College with additional on- the-job training and experince required. S. Graduate from college plus additional and extensive training or experience. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES IIOIIIES ;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA z 108 6. Graduate from college with no training and experience. Maximum Iotal Points: 32 Maximum Assigned Points: 9r RESPONSIBILITY Paint Total 2. Responsibility for Equipment Spread Points This factor is a measure of the job's responsibility 0-13 3 for performing work without damaging equipment. It evaluates the responsibility for preventing damage due to carelessness or negligence to the equipment used in the performance of a job. Credit is based on the care necessary to prevent damage and in consideration of the estimated cost of the damage for any one mishap. Auxilliary equipment not actually used by the job should then be taken into consideration if careless actions by the worker may result in damage to it. The use of l expensive equipment does not necessarily involve a high degree of responsibility unless, a slight mistake will involve a serious loss of life or property. FACTOR DEGREES: Point Spread 0-13. Use of Equipment I a. Little care required. Damage not 0 likely to occur. b. Ordinary care required. Some opportu- 3 1-3 nity of damage of small consequence. C. Steady care required. Regular opportu-_ 4-7 ' nity for but not frequent occurrence r of damage. Damage fairly large. I d. Special care required. Frequent oppor- _ 8-11 j tunity for damage of considerable extent or less frequent opportunity for greater damage. e. Sustained, special care required. Con- 12-13 tinuous opportunity for damage of serious nature. i Maximum Total Points: 13 i Maximum Assigned Points: 3_ RESPONSIBILITY Point Total Spread Points 3. Responsibility for Direction and i i i i i i MICROFILMED BY ' JORM MICROLAB i CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES i { ;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB • CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA FIICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES r10111CS Instruction of Others 1-12 This factor measures the responsibility which goes with the job for instructing and directing the work of others. It is not intended to appraise supervisor responsibilities for results. The number of men and women directed shall be considered as those given immediate guidance and also those directly assisted through any other channels. FACTOR DEGREES: a. Responsible only for own work but may 1 _ coordinate work with others. b. Responsible for instructing and direct- 2-4 _ Ing one or two helpers 50% or more of the time. -• c. Responsible for instructing, directing 5-8 ior setting up for a small group of I employees ususally in the same occupation up to ten persons. d. Responsible for instructing, directing 10 9-12 { - and maintaining the flow of work in a group up to 20 persons. j - Maximum Total Points: 12 - Maximum Assigned Points: 10 J 4• Responsibility for Contacts Points Total Spread Points This factor measures the courtesy, tact and 0-10 persuasiveness required to maintain good -� t relationships with people at all levels within the organization and to induce cooperation by I personal or telephone conversations with persons other than immediate supervisors or co-workers. FACTOR DEGREES: a. Little if any public contact or inter - 0 departmental interaction. i b. Handles general public and inter- 1-2 departmental interaction occasionally only, s C. Comes in contact with general public 3-7 continuously. d. All contacts internally and with the 8-10 general public are part of the job function, 1 i I FIICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES r10111CS r ;•MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA 1 `I F& 110 MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 110111E5 Maximum Total Points: 10 6. Responsibility for Performance Spread Points Maximum Assigned Points: 7 1-10 7 and authority necessary to successfully complete Point Total S. Responsibility for Confidential Data Spread Points granted the position insofar as outcome is This factor measures the amount of access a job 0-8 5 has to confidential data, possible results of a a, Follow established methods and pro- breach of this condfidentiality and the impact cedures; refer exceptions. it could have on an individual, the City or the 2-3 repetitive and related, standard community as a whole. instructions and procedures serve as FACTOR DEGREES: guides. Unusual problems are referred, a. No contact with confidential data at 0 C. Limited supervision. The nature of anytime. the work is such that it is performed b. Some contact with confidential data 1-3 under close observation and supervision C. Complete and total access to data that 5 4-6 could be damaging to other employees. d. Complete and total access to data that 7 could be damaging to people and City operations. e. Complete and total access that could 8 be damaging to people, City operations and the entire community as a whole. Maximum Total Points: 8 Maximum Assigned Points: 5 MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 110111E5 Point Total 6. Responsibility for Performance Spread Points This factor measures the level of responsibility 1-10 7 and authority necessary to successfully complete the job. Consideration is given to types of parameters expressed and the degree of autonomy granted the position insofar as outcome is determined. FACTOR DEGREES: a, Follow established methods and pro- 1 cedures; refer exceptions. b. Occasional, since most duties are 2-3 repetitive and related, standard instructions and procedures serve as guides. Unusual problems are referred, frequently with suggestions for correction. C. Limited supervision. The nature of 4-5 the work is such that it is performed to a large extent on own responsibility MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 110111E5 MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA 111 after assignemenl, with some choice of method. Occasionally develop own methods. d. Broad objectives are outlined. Work is 7 judged primarily on overall results with much choice of method. Frequently develop methods to achieve desired results. e. Little or no supervision. Have wide _ choice in selection, development and coordination of methods within broad framework of general policies. Maximum Total Points: 10 Maximum Assigned Points: 7 7. Mental and Visual Attention This factor considers the concentration and alertness, both mental and visual, required by a job. It is measured by the type of work or problems encountered. It is limited by the frequency of occurrence of problems and the alertness and concentration necessary for the solution of these problems. Consider- ation should also be given to the variety of work, amount and complexity of planning or Inspection and that coodination of visual attention with manual dexterity. FACTOR DEGREES: a. Little mental and intermittent visual _ attention. Work requiring no close or sustained attention, b. Ordinary mental and visual attention. _ Work where irregularities or dirficul- ties are fairly infrequent or minor in effect. C. Frequent mental or visual attention. _ Work involves some likelihood of irregularity or difficulty. 4 d. Continuous mental and visual atlen- _ tion. Operation required constant alertness. e. Concentrated mental and visual atten- tion. Work involves planning and laying out complex work. Maximum Total Points: 5 MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOINES 6-7 B-10 Point Spread 1-5 1 2 3 4 5 Total Points 4 ;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB i • CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS- DES MOINES 112 Maximum Assigned Points: 4 Point Total _ B. Hazards Spread Points This factor appraises the hazards of both ac- 0-6 4 cident and health connected with surrounding the job even though all safety devices have been installed. Consider the material being handled, the machines to be used, work positions, the possibility of accident even though none has occurred and the possible seriousness of the injury. Where the job has several different hazards, consider the greatest of these hazards from the standpoint of time exposed or the probability and severity of injury. FACTOR DEGREES: a. Accident or health hazards absent or 0 — negligible. b. Accidents improbable outside of minor 1-3 injuries such as abrasions, cuts, _ bruises or burns. Health hazards are negligible. 4 — c. Exposure to loss time accidents such 4 as crushed hand or foot, loss of fingers, eye injury, etc. Some exposure to occupational diseases not Incapacita- ting in nature. d. Exposure to incapacitating accident or 5 health hazards. ` e. Exposure to accidents or occupational 6 _. disease which may result in total disability or death. Maximum Total Points: 6 1 Maximum Assigned Points: 4 r Point Total 9. Surroundings Spread Points r This factor is a measure of the disagreeable 0-4 4 features of a job. The features to be con- sidered are those which affect the physical senses and cause discomfort to the employees. Typical causes of discomfort are dirt, fumes, odors, heat, cold, dampness, dust, glare, vibration, noise, inadequate lighting, poor ventilation. Consider also the relative amount and continuity of exposure to these conditions which make the job undesirable. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS- DES MOINES i !.:,MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES. IOWA i i ' 113 _ FACTOR DEGREES: a. Pleasant surroundings with no objet- _ tionable features. b. Fair conditions m• rare exposure to _ disagreeable elements. C. Occasional exposure to disagreeable Z — elements. d. Frequent exposure to one particularly _ disagreeable element or continuous exposure to several. e. Continuous and intensive exposure to _ I extremely hazardous elements. I � � Maximum Total Points: 2 Maximum Assigned Points: 4 ` MAXSMUM ASSIGNED POINTS - ALL CATEGORIES: 67 MAXIMUM TOTAL POINTS - ALL CATEGORIES: 100 I i JI f I; I j1 ii I pp 11 I I r I I I '� i M ! I I 1 M I - i I I I li I i MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES IIOIIIES 0 1 2 3 M-ICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA i I � 1 I nl; 1 1, I i Results of this analysis presented the following changes and/or i revisions in the classification system. I 1 i' i I I 1 ! I r i � 1 ! MICROFILMED BY j ! JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES 1 r 1 ;_MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA 115 MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES DOIFIES Q Q 0 � LL Omi O Of zO ,-, Of 1 F Q IM o-.1 LL Jw N O U LL Ot tt) M H CD 0 1~+ a CD 0 W Y m O n 2 _ a l � m r. z !I r, i N _ < 6 2 O H E E w � z Z C u c m L - -Z 1� O C � or V c U >,> N w M o o. r L N b U C N d d WI � O ¢ ch a CD „ 115 MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES DOIFIES MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA RETAKE OF PRECEDING DOCUMENT MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES !IDIIIES JORM MICR®LAS TARGET SERIES -'MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA i 6.,441 MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES HIRES Fooli I •.: , .�^, �_ _.. ._ �� r� „'°'y c.�y v,wi ir�4 �.. r'un"I t+r•y 1979 JOB EVALUATION BENCH MARK POSITIONS SALARY DATA OLD NEW CLASSIFICATION OLD / GRADE POSITION POSITION ASSIGNED POINTS MAX POINTS FROM TO FROM TO Professional and Technical I 1 11 Library'Circ. Same 58 100 9 / 11 933/1204 r i Supv. 11 Assist. Supt. Same 67 100 52 / 11 1050/1431 — 9 Rehab. Finance 51 100 9 9 933/1204 Specialist i 1 r i I i I i MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES HIRES ,.-MICROFILMED BY JORM MiCROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA n6 Group 4• Supervisors and Executives A. Classification System Positions within this classification were evaluated according to two (2) major factors: knowledge and responsibility. While job knowledge measured the knowledge and experience required to perform a job satisfactorily, its subfactors were different. Pre-employment Training was defined as the mental development " and general knowledge required through schooling or self - study required to absorb the specific training necessary for I satisfactory performance on the job. Employment Training measured the specific training and experience (in addition to pre-employment training) necessary to acquire proficiency in performing the duties of a job. The longer the period of training required the more responsibility was assigned. Supervisory Experience measured the supervisory experience ` required to adequately motivate and manage employees in the accomplishment of departmental objectives. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES IIOIIIES ;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB r� 117 CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA Responsibility for Organizing and Planning measured the job responsibility for organizing and planning departmental activities. It evaluated the degree of responsibility assigned for performance standards, accountability for achieving those standards and the authority for carrying out plans and procedures. Credit was based on the relative impact improper planning and organizing could have on the City administration and ultimate affect on City residents as a whole. Particular attention was given to overall responsibility for planing the workflow so as to ensure optimum utilization of human and monetary resources. Responsibility for Principles and Methods measured the initiative and independent judgment required to design and implement principles and methods that would benefit the attainment of an efficient and effective operation. Emphasis was placed on transforming broad conceptual techniques into workable procedures geared toward minimizing conflicts and duplication of effort. Responsibility for Decisions measured the relative responsibility for decision making on the job. Credit was based on the impact an Incorrect decision could have on operations and the degree of authority and autonomy granted in the making of decisions. Flexibility granted the job in the area of decision making was of the utmost consideration in evaluating this factor. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOINES I , i I I J i I 1 IN 3 � M ti i I i i ;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB r� 117 CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA Responsibility for Organizing and Planning measured the job responsibility for organizing and planning departmental activities. It evaluated the degree of responsibility assigned for performance standards, accountability for achieving those standards and the authority for carrying out plans and procedures. Credit was based on the relative impact improper planning and organizing could have on the City administration and ultimate affect on City residents as a whole. Particular attention was given to overall responsibility for planing the workflow so as to ensure optimum utilization of human and monetary resources. Responsibility for Principles and Methods measured the initiative and independent judgment required to design and implement principles and methods that would benefit the attainment of an efficient and effective operation. Emphasis was placed on transforming broad conceptual techniques into workable procedures geared toward minimizing conflicts and duplication of effort. Responsibility for Decisions measured the relative responsibility for decision making on the job. Credit was based on the impact an Incorrect decision could have on operations and the degree of authority and autonomy granted in the making of decisions. Flexibility granted the job in the area of decision making was of the utmost consideration in evaluating this factor. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOINES -`MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA 1 118 Responsibility for Administration measured the , responsibility for development, implementation and administration of unit projects. Credit was based on problem solving techniques, creativity and scheduling and the effect this could have on programmatic efforts. Additional measures identified the nature and extent of the job holder's responsibility for obtaining results. It included the amount of physical resources available and degree of authority needed to utilize resources in reaching objectives. Responsibility for Supervision measured the responsibility for I supervising the work of others. It was intended to appraise supervisory responsibilities for results. The number of individuals directed was considered as those given immediate guidance and also those indirectly assisted through channels. Credit was given to the degree of motivation exhibited by employees In the performance of their immediate responsibilities I and the general departmental climate. Responsibility for Budgeting and Financial control measured the degree of budget and financial responsibility of the job. Credit was based on the job's ability to match performance with budgetary allocations. Additional consideration related to the relative degree of decision making and access to financial support given the job. i=- - MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES 110INES .MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA 1 � MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOINES 119 ix •• Responsibility for ConfidentiaL Data and contacts was measured a in the same manner as in groups two and three. is B. Classification Results •. The positions bench marked and analyzed within this group i I were: Community Development Block Grant Coordinator, i Controller, Superintendent and Director. Those evaluations are as follows. 7 I � N j � I 1 iY M �a iW t J MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOINES r -IMICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 1101fitS 120 — JOB EVALUATION _. FY79 POSITION: CDBG Coordinator -- --._______ DATE: _ CLASSIFICATION: SUPCRVISORS & EXECUTIVES RANGE: EVALUATION COMPONENTS _ KNOWLEDGE This factor considers the education, knowledge experience and the worker must have to salisfperform the job aictorily. It is measured by the complexity OF practical knowledge the worker must possess whether it be gained by on-the-job experience, prior training and education or both. It is limited by, the 'nature OF instructions received regarding the work task and by the amount of supervision received. 1. Pre-employment Training Point Total Ran . c a• This factor is defined as the mental Por_ _its development and general knowledge as 1-18 acquired through schooling or self study required to absorb the specific training necessary for satisfactory per- formance on the job, b• Employment Training & Experience 1-17 �. Specific training and experience in addition to pre-employment training necessary to acquire proficiency in L performing the duties Of the job. The longer the period Of training required the more responsibility is assigned, C. Supervisory Experience 1-10 -- A measure of the supervisory experience required to adequately motivate employees in the accomplishment of departmental objectives. Maximum Total Points: 45 - Maximum Assigned Points: 32 FACTOR Scope of knowledge is measured by the level of experience obtained in each component and Is measured by three degrees: 1) elementary - level knowledge entry- with minimal standards; 2) inlernm(Ilale knowledge Iccluir•nd through continued exposura to additional training in arca of Competence; 3) expert - advanced training and experience dealing with each level of professional competency in area of conrentration, ej MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 1101fitS BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA 121 dge of: •e -employment 'I r;rining High school plus two years college; — College degree; Advanced graduate 10 degree; Professiona! degree, i.e. law, engineering, medicine, etc. Point Spread 1-18 Casual Intermediate Exoert 1-5 6-10 11-118 int Sreat B. Employment Training and Experience Casual Intermediate 1-17 Ex eat 1. None; 1-6 7-13 14.17 2. Three months to 1 year; 3. 1-3 years; �4^ 4. 4-7 years; 5. 8+ years. C. Supervisory ExperiencePoint Spread 1-10 Casual Intermediate Expert 1. None; 1-3 4-7 2. Under 1 year; 8-10 3. 1-5 years; —B- 4. 6-10 years; S. 10+ years. RESPONSIBILITY 2. Responsibility for organizing h Planning Soi � d �— This factor is a measure or the jobs responsible 0-10 for organizing and planning departmental activities. It evaluates the degree of responsibility assigned for performance standards, accountability for achieving those standards and the authority for carrying out plans and procedures. Credit is based on the relative impact improper planning and organizing could have on the City administration and the ultimate effect on City residents. Particular attention is given to -overall responsibility for planning the work flow so as to insure optimum utilization of human and monitary resources. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MONIES Total Points ;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA 1 ' MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES M011ics 122 FACTOR DEGREES: 1. Organization and planning or activities 0 for approval of immediate supervisor, _ only. No direct responsibility; 2. Minimal responsibility for organizing 1-3 and planning activities as it relates to day-to-day operations only. Long- term planning is the responsibility of the immediate supervisor; - 3. Responsibility and authority for maxi- 7 4-7 - mizing resources with occasional exceptions rererred to supervisor for _ a decision; 4. Complete authority and responsibility 8-10 for fiscal administration with little direction from supervisor; borad objectives are generally outlined. Maximum Total Points: 10 — Maximum Assigned Points: 7 ` RESPONSIBILITY Point Total 3. Responsibility for Principals & Methods Spread Points This factor measures the initiative and indepen- 0-10 8 _. dent judgement required to design and implement principles and methods that benefit the attain- ment of an efficient and effective operation. Emphasis is placed on transforming broad concep- tual techniques into workable procedures geared toward minimizing conflicts and duplication of effort. ` FACTOR DEGREES: 1. No direct responsibility for principles 0 ~ or methods; 2. Follow, established methods and proce- 1-3 (lures, refer all exceptions; 3. Occasional since most duties are 4-7 repetitive and related. Standard Instructions and procedures serve as ` guides. Unusual problems are referred „ frequently with suggestions for cor- rection. The nature of the wort; Is such that it is performed to a large extent on own responsibility after assignement with some choice of method. Occasionally develop own methods; 4. Have -wide choice in selection, devel- _.,8_ 8-10 opment and coordination of methods within broad framework of general policies. V MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES M011ics 1 i i I f I ' i I i I i li I1 i ;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA i I 123 Maximum Toral Points: MAKimllm Assigned Points: _ B RESPONSIBILI1 Y 4. Responsibility for Decisions This factor measures the relative responsibility for decision making on a job. Credit is based on the impact an incorrect decision could have on operations and the degree of authority and autonomy granted in the making of decisions. FACTOR DEGREES: 1. No Independent decisions made without _ supervisory input; 2. Minor decisions are made without super- visor approval as they relate to day- to-day operational problems; 3. Major operational changes and decisions must be reviewed before implementation;^ 4. Discretion granted in responsibility _ for making decisions that affect unit; 5. Broad discretion in responsibility and _ authority granted in all aspects of decision making. Maximum TOtAI Points: '10 Maximum Assigned Points: _ 6 - RESPONSIBILITY _RESPONSIBILITY Point Spread 0-10 0 1-3 4-5' 6-8 9-10 Point 5. Responsibility for Adminstralion Spread This factor measures the responsibility for a 0-5 development, implementation and administration of unit projects. Credit is based on how the programs may require problem salving, creative- ness and scheduling. Additional measures identify the nature and extent of the job holder's respon- sibility for obtaining results. It includes the amount of physical resources available and degree Of physical resources available and degree of Authority needed to utilize resources in reaching objectives. FACTOR DEGREE;: 1. Responsibility for administration Of 0 unit project' is generally given to Immediate supervisor; MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES .Total Points 6 Total Points f :,MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA 124 2. Sonic discretion granted in making 1 recommendations for• possible implemen- tation of activities; 3. , Responsible fur implementation of 3 2-3 _ projects whose bi-oad objectives have '< already been ouLlied without budget access; 4. Responsible for design and adrninistra- 4 tion of new projects with budget access; 5. Responsibility for design, impleninn- 5 latinn and administralion of new projects — with intended budget responsibilities and accountabilities. Maximum Total Points: 5 Maximum Assigned Points: RESPONSIBILITY 6. Responsibility for Supervision Point Spread This factor measures the responsibility which 0-5 goes with the job for supervising the work of others. It is not intended to appraise super- visory responsibility for results. The number j of individuals directed shall be considered as those given immcdaite guidance and also those Indirectly assisted through channels. Cr•Ddit should be given to the degree of motivation exhibited by employees in the performance of r I their Immediate responsibilities. FACTOR DEGREES: I i 1. Responsible only for own work but may 0 i , coordlante with others; 2. Responsible for instructing and direct - 1 -2 ing one or, two helpm•s 50% or more of the time; j 3. Responsible for instructing, directing 4 3-4 _ or setting up for a small group of employees usually in the same operation, j up to 10 persons; 4. Responsible for instructing, directing 5 and maintaining the flow of work, up to 20 persons. Maximum Total Points: 5 I I I i 1 i Maximurn Assigned Points: 4 - I i I i FIICROFILRED BY JORM MICROLAB 1 CEDAR RAPIDS•DES NOIRES Total Points 4 ;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA 125 RESPONSIBILITY MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES IIOIaES Total Points Ir Total Points 4 Maximum Total Points: 5 Point. 7. Responsibility for COnUcts �P_I;ead RESPONSIBII.I'rY Thls fi11'tur IllP;It,LI'CL tllo c(mr1w,y, Lact arid 0-5 porsuasivvnr,s required lu maintain good B. Responsibility for Confidential Data relationships with INDPIP. at DII luvcls within the organization and to inctuce cooperation by 0-5 personal or telephone contraunications with persons other than immediate supervisors or co-workers. FACTOR DEGREES: it could have on an individual, the City or the 1. Little if any public contact or inter- 0 departmental interaction; 2. Handles general public and inter- _ -_ 1-2 departmental interaxtion occasionally 2. only; 1 3. Comes in contact with general public 4 3-4 3. continuously; 2-3 4. All contacts internally and with the ,__ 5 4. general public are part of the job 4 function. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES IIOIaES Total Points Ir Total Points 4 Maximum Total Points: 5 Maximum Assigned Points: 4 RESPONSIBII.I'rY Point B. Responsibility for Confidential Data Spread This factor measures the amount of access a job 0-5 has to confidential data, the possible results of a breach of this confidentiality and the impact it could have on an individual, the City or the community as a whole. FACTOR DEGREES: 1. No contact with confidential data at 0 any time; 2. Some contact with confidentail data 1 under close ObSCI VatlOn and supmvision; 3. Complete and total access to data that _ _ 2-3 could be damaging to other employees' 4 4. Complete and total access to data that , 4 could be damaging to people and City operations; 5. Complete and total access that Gould be. damaging to people, City operations and the entire community as a whole. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES IIOIaES Total Points Ir Total Points 4 ,.-MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, I , IOWA 1 126 I Maximum Total Points: 5 4 Maximum Assigned Points: RESPONSIBILITY Point Total ' Spread 9. Responsibility for Budgeting & Points - Financial Control the degree of budget and 0 5 This factor measures financial responsibility for the job. Cre��ormance i is based on the, jobs ability [o match p consideration with budgetary allocations, additional to the. relative dogree of decision making relates and access to financial support given the job. sa � FACTOREES: No responsibility for budget and 0 financial administration; 1_2 Respnsibilir/ granted for recommending a.r i 2, budgal no responsibility for adminl- stration;3-4 j 3. Responsibility for approval of expenses 4 only up to $250.00; 5 4, Total responsibility for administration of budget with no restrictions on amount, with guidelines. i Maximum Total Points: 5 i Maximum Assigned Points: 4_ TOTAL POINTS ASSIGNED ALL CATEGORIES: 74 i,-'— I MAXIMl1M TOTALPOINTS ALL CATEGORIES: — 100 ... 1 ,r I I 1 i I v I' I; i I I I rr j I i I i i i i MICROFILMED BY ' JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES i 9 -MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB 907 CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA IP7 .A)IS LVALUA PION FY79 POSITION: Controller I)A'rr: CLASSIFICATION: SUPERVISORS & EXECUTIVES RANGL: EVALUATION COMPONEN-r5 KNOWLEDGE This factor considers the education, knowledge and experience the worker must have to perform the job satisfactorily. It is measured by the complexity of practical knowledge the worker"must possess whether it be gained by on-the-job experience, prior training and education or both. It is limited by the nature of instructions received regarding the work task and by the amount of supervision received. Point Total 1. Pr•e-employment Training Range Points N. This factor is defined as the mental 1-18 development and general knowledge as acquired through schooling or self study required to absorb the specific training necessary for satisfactory per- formance on the job. b. Employment 'training & Experience 1-17 Specific training and experience in addition to pre-employment training necessary to acquire proficiency in performing the duties of the job. The longer the period of training required the more responsibility is assigned. C. Supervisory Experience 1-10 A measure of the supervisory experience required to adequately motivate employees in the aCCOMPlishinenl of departmental objectives. Maximum Total Points: 45 Maximum Assigned Points: 36 FACTOR DEGREES: Scope of knowledge is measured by the level of experience obtained In each component and is measured by three degrees: 1) elementary - ent•y- level knowledge with minimal standards; 2) inlorowdiale knowledge ar-quired through continued exposure to additional training in area of competence; 3) expert - advanced training and experience dealing with each level or professional competency in area of concentration. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES i I LMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA 128 wledge ur: Pre-employment 'I r.iining 1. High school plus two years college; —`- 2. College degree; 3. Advanced graduate 76 degree; 4. Professional degree, _ i.e. law, engineering, medicine, etc. B. Employment Training and Experience 1 None; 2. Three months to 1 year; 3. 1-3 years; 13 4. 4-7 years; 5. 8+ years. Point Spread .8 casual InEMIe ate Exert '1-5 6-10 11-18 Point Spreat 1-17 Casual Intermediate Expert 1-6 7-13 14-17 Point Spread 1-10 C. Supervisory Experience Casual Intermediate Expert 1. None; 1-3 4-7 B -1U 2. Under 1 year; 3. 'I-5 years; 4. 6-10 years; S. 10+ years. RESPONSIBILITY Point 2. Responsibility for Organizing & Planning Spread This factor is a measure of the jobs responsible 0-10 for organizing and planning departmental activities. It evaluates the degree of responsibility assigned for performance standards, accountability for achieving those standards and the authority for carrying out plans and procedures. Cr•odlt is based on the relative impact improper planning and organizing could hove on the City administration and the ultimate effect on City residents. Particular attention Is given to -overall responsibility for planning the work flow so as to insure optimum utilization of human and monitary resources. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MDIIIEs Total Points 7 1 i i hI i i 1 I� I LMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA 128 wledge ur: Pre-employment 'I r.iining 1. High school plus two years college; —`- 2. College degree; 3. Advanced graduate 76 degree; 4. Professional degree, _ i.e. law, engineering, medicine, etc. B. Employment Training and Experience 1 None; 2. Three months to 1 year; 3. 1-3 years; 13 4. 4-7 years; 5. 8+ years. Point Spread .8 casual InEMIe ate Exert '1-5 6-10 11-18 Point Spreat 1-17 Casual Intermediate Expert 1-6 7-13 14-17 Point Spread 1-10 C. Supervisory Experience Casual Intermediate Expert 1. None; 1-3 4-7 B -1U 2. Under 1 year; 3. 'I-5 years; 4. 6-10 years; S. 10+ years. RESPONSIBILITY Point 2. Responsibility for Organizing & Planning Spread This factor is a measure of the jobs responsible 0-10 for organizing and planning departmental activities. It evaluates the degree of responsibility assigned for performance standards, accountability for achieving those standards and the authority for carrying out plans and procedures. Cr•odlt is based on the relative impact improper planning and organizing could hove on the City administration and the ultimate effect on City residents. Particular attention Is given to -overall responsibility for planning the work flow so as to insure optimum utilization of human and monitary resources. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MDIIIEs Total Points 7 U ;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB 1 129 CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA FACTOR DEGREES: 1. Organization and planning of activities _ 0 for approval of inuaediate supervisur only. No direct responsibility; 1-3 2, Minimal responsibility fur organizing and planning activities as it relates to day-to-day operations only. Long- term planning is the responsibility of the immediate supervisor; 3. Responsibility and authority for maxi- _7 4_7 mizing resources with occasional exceptions referred to supervisor for a decision; 4. Complete authority and responsibility 8-10 for fiscal administration with little direction from supervisor; borad objectives are generally outlined. Maximum Total Points: 10 Maximum Assigned Points: 7 OESPONSIBILITY Point 3. Responsibility for.Principals & Methods Spread This factor measures the initiative and indepen- 0-10 dent judgement required to clesign and implement principles and methods that benefit the attain- ment of an efficient and effective operation. Emphasis is placed on transforming broad concep- tual techniques into workable procedures geared toward minimizing conflicts and duplication of effort. FACTOR DEGREES: 1. No direct responsibility for principles 0 or methods; 1-3 2. Fallow established methods and pr•oce- dures, refer all exceptions; 4-7 3. Occasional since most duties are _ repetitive and related. Standard instructions and procedures serve as guides. Unusual problems are referred frequently with suggestions for cor- rection. The nature of the work Is such that it is performed to a large extent on own responsibility after assignement with some choice of method. Occasionally develop own methods; 4. Have wide choire in selection, level- L 8-10 opment and coordination of methods within broad framework of Ocneral policies. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS.DES r101DES Total Points _ 8 i ;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA 130 Maximum Total Points: Maximum Assigned Points: _8 _ RESPONSIBILITY 4. Responsibility for Decisions This factor measures the relative responsibility for decision making on a job. Credit is based on the impact an incorrect decision could have on operations and the degree or authority and autonomy granted in the making of decisions. FACTOR DEGREES: 1. No independent decisions made without supervisory input; 2. Minor decisions are made without super- visor• approval as they relate to day- to-day operational problems; 3. Major operational Changes aril decisions must be reviewed before implementation; 4. Discretion granted in responsibility for making decisions that affect unit; 5. Broad discretion in responsibility and _ authority granted in all aspects of decision making. Maxinxmr Total Points: '10 Maximum Assigned Points: _7 _ RESPONSIBILITY S. Responsibility for Adminstralion This factor measures the responsibility for a development, iniplamcntation and administration of unit projects. Credit is based on how the programs may require problem solving, creative- ness arid scheduling. Additional measures identify the nature and extent of the job holder's respon- sibility for obtaining results. It includes the amount of physical resources available and degree of Physical resources available and degree of authority needed to utilize resources in reaching objectives. FACTOR DEGREES: 1. Responsibility fur administration of unit project:, is generally given to immediate supurvisur; MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES HOMES Point Total Spread Points 0-10 7 0 1-3 �e 4-5 6-8 hr {i r 9-10 M I Point Total Spread Points 0-5 a �. . 0 " , -MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB • CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA 131 2. Some discretion granted in making 1 recommendations 1'or possible implernen- tation of activities; 3. Responsible for implementation of 2.3 projects whose broad objectives have already been oullied without budget access - 4. Responsible for design and administra- 4 _ tion of new projects with budget access; S. Responsibility for design, implernen- j tation and administration of new projects with intended budget responsibilities and accountabilitius. Maximum Total Points: 5 Maximum Assigned Points: _4 J RESPONSIBILITY i 1 + Point Spread This factor measures the responsibility which 0-5 i others. It is not intended to appraise super- visory responsibility for results, The number of Individuals directed shall be considered as those given immedaite guidance and also those indirectly assisted through channels. Credit IJ exhibited by employees in the performance of their immediate responsibilities. FACTOR DEGREES: i 1. Responsible only for own work but may 0 coordiante with others; j 2. Responsible for instructing and direct- 1-2 ing one or lwe helpers 50% or more of the time; 3. Respnnsible for instructing, directing q� 1 _ or setting up I'nr a small group of i employees usually in the same operation, LIP to 10 persons; 4. Responsible for instructing, directing 5 and maintaining the, flow of work, up to 20 persons. i Maximum Total Points: 5 Maximum Assigned Points: 4 r i I 9 r , i M I � I -MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB • CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA 131 2. Some discretion granted in making 1 recommendations 1'or possible implernen- tation of activities; 3. Responsible for implementation of 2.3 projects whose broad objectives have already been oullied without budget access - 4. Responsible for design and administra- 4 _ tion of new projects with budget access; S. Responsibility for design, implernen- 5 tation and administration of new projects with intended budget responsibilities and accountabilitius. Maximum Total Points: 5 Maximum Assigned Points: _4 RESPONSIBILITY 6. Responsibility for Supervision Point Spread This factor measures the responsibility which 0-5 goes with the job for supervising the work of others. It is not intended to appraise super- visory responsibility for results, The number of Individuals directed shall be considered as those given immedaite guidance and also those indirectly assisted through channels. Credit should be given to the dogree of motivation exhibited by employees in the performance of their immediate responsibilities. FACTOR DEGREES: 1. Responsible only for own work but may 0 coordiante with others; 2. Responsible for instructing and direct- 1-2 ing one or lwe helpers 50% or more of the time; 3. Respnnsible for instructing, directing q� 3-4 _ or setting up I'nr a small group of employees usually in the same operation, LIP to 10 persons; 4. Responsible for instructing, directing 5 and maintaining the, flow of work, up to 20 persons. Maximum Total Points: 5 Maximum Assigned Points: 4 MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOIIIES Total Points r ;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA 132 RESPONSIBILITY Point 7. Responsibility for, Contacts Spread This factor, measures the courtesy, tact and 0-5 persuasiveness required to maintain good relationships with people at all levels within the organization and to induce cooperation by personal or telephone communications with persons other than immediate supervisors or co-workers. FACTOR DEGREES: 1. Little if any public contact or inter- 0 departmental interaction; 2. Handles general public and inter- 1-2 departmental inleraxlion occasionally only; 3. Comes in contact with general public 4 3-4 continuously; 4. All contacts inte•nally and with the 5 general public are part of the job function. Maximum Total Points: 5 Maxinwm Assigned Points: 4 I RESPONSIBILITY Point B. Responsibility for Confidential Data Spread This factor measures the amount of access a job 0-5 has to confidential data, the possible results of a breach of this confidentiality and the impact it could have on an individual, the City or the community as a whole. FACTOR DEGREES: 1. No contact with confidential data at 0 any time; 2. Some contact with confidentail data 1 under close observation and supervision. 3. Complete and total access to data that _ _ 2-3 could be damaging to other employees; 4 4. Complete and total access to data that 4 could be damaging to people and City operations; 5. Complete and total access that could be 5 damaging to people, City operations and the entire community as a whole. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES a01aES Total Points 4 Total Points 4 r -(MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA j , 133 _ Maximum Total Points: 5 Maximum Assigned Points: 4 RESPONSIBILI fY Point Total 9. Responsibility for Budgeting & Spread Points Financial Control This factor measures the degree of budget and 0-5 4 financial responsibility for the job. Credit is based on the job's ability to match performance ! with budgetary allocations, additional consideration relates to the relative degree of decision making and access to financial support given the job. _ FACTOR DEGREES: 1. No responsibility for budget and 0 t financial administration; 2. Respnsibility granted for recommending 1-2 budget - no responsibility for adminl- ' I .. stration; I 3. Responsibility for approval of expenses 4 3-4 I only up to $250.00; 4. Total responsibility for administration 5 ' _ _ of budget with no restrictions on —f I i i amount, with guidelines. Maximum Total Points: 5 Maximum Assigned Points: 4 TOTAL POINTS ASSIGNED - ALL CATEGORIES: 78 MAXIMUM TOTAL POINTS - ALL CATEGORIES: 700 1 i r ;i 1; l v � 1 1 � - 1377 i MICROFILMED BY ' JORM MICROLAB ` CEDAR RAPIDS -DES IIOIOCs 'IMICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA 134 JOB I:VALUAHON FY79 POSITION: ___,$pperint_endent.. _..___ DATE: CLASSIFICATION: SUPERVISORS & EXECUTIVES RANGE: EVALUATION COPAPONENTS KNOWLEDGE This factor considers the education, knowledge and experience the worker must have to perform the job satisfactorily. It is measured by the complexity of practical knowledge the worker must possess whether it be gained by on-the-job experience, prior training and education or both. It is limited by. the nature of instructions received regarding the work task and by the amount of supervision received Point 'total 1. Pre-employment Training Range Points a. This factor is defined as the mental devclopmunt and general knowledge as acquired through schooling or self study required to absorb the specific training necessary for satisfactory per- formance on the job. b. Employment Training & Experience 1.17 _ Specific training and experience in addition to pre-employment training necessary to acquire proficiency in performing the duties of the job. The longer the period of training required the more responsibility is assigned. C. Supervisory Experience 1-10 A measure of the supervisory experience required to adequately nurlivate employees in the accomplishment of departmental objectives. Maximum Total Points: 45 Maximum Assigned Points: _32 FACTOR DEGREES: Scope of knowledge is measure(] by the level of experience obtained in each component and is measured by three degrees: 1) elementary - entry- level knowledge with minimal standards; 2) intermediate knowlodge acquired through continued uxposuro to additional training in area of competence; 3) expert - advanced training and experience dealing with each level of professional compotency in area of concentration. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES 4:1 I j J 1 i i I, I i 1 i j Expert i I i i i i 14-17 I ,MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA 135 Itnowledge of: A. Pre-employment 'I rd ining 1. High school plus two years college; 2. College degree; 11 3. Advanced graduate __ .• degree; 4. Professional degree, i.e. law, engineering, medicine, etc. Point Spread 118 CDsuaI Intermediate EMeq 1-5 6-10 11 -'IB 1. one; _ 2, Under 1 year; 3. 1-5 years; _ 4. 6-10 years; S. 10+ years. _ RESPONSIBILITY point 2. Responsibility for Organizing & planning Spread This factor is a measure of the jobs responsible 0-10 for organizing and planning departmental activities. It evaluates the degree of responsibility assigned for performance standards, eccotmtability for achieving those standards and the authority for carrying out plans and procedures. Credit is based on the relative impact improper planning and organizing could have on the City administration and lho ulEimate erred on City residents. particular attention is given to -overall responsibility for planning the work flow so as to insure optimum utilization of human and monitary resources. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES Total Points 7 H Point Spreat 1-17 B. Employment Training and Experience Casual Intermediate Expert 1. None; 1-6 7-13 14-17 2. Three months to 1 year; . 13 3. 1-3 years; —_ 4. 4-7 years; 5. 8+ years. Point Spread 1-10 C. Supervisory Experience Casual Intermediate Expert 1.3 4-7 B-10 1. one; _ 2, Under 1 year; 3. 1-5 years; _ 4. 6-10 years; S. 10+ years. _ RESPONSIBILITY point 2. Responsibility for Organizing & planning Spread This factor is a measure of the jobs responsible 0-10 for organizing and planning departmental activities. It evaluates the degree of responsibility assigned for performance standards, eccotmtability for achieving those standards and the authority for carrying out plans and procedures. Credit is based on the relative impact improper planning and organizing could have on the City administration and lho ulEimate erred on City residents. particular attention is given to -overall responsibility for planning the work flow so as to insure optimum utilization of human and monitary resources. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES Total Points 7 H CROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB 136 • CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA ICTOR DEGREES: Organization and planning of activities for approval of inunediale supervisor only. No direct responsibility; Minimal responsibility for organizing and planning activities as it relates to day-to-day operations only. Long- term planning is the responsibility of the immediate supervisor; Responsibility and authority for maxi- 7 mizing resources with occasional exceptions referred to supervisor for a decision; 4. Complete authority and responsibility 8 . for fiscal administration with little direction from supervisor; broad objectives are generally outlined. Maximum Total Points: 10 Maximum Assigned Points: 7 RESPONSIBILITy 3. Responsibility for Principals & Methods This factor measures the initiative and indepen- dent judgement required to design and implement principles and methods that benefit the attain- ment of an efficient and effective operation. Emphasis is placed on transforming broad concep- tual techniques into workable procedures geared toward minimizing conflicts and duplication of effort. FACTOR DEGREES: 1. No direct responsibility for principles or method:;; 2. Follow established methods and prone- dures, refer all excLiotions; 3. Occasional since most duties are _ repetitive and related. Standard instructions and procedures serve as guides. Unusual problems are referred frequently with suggestions for cor- rection. The nature of the work Is such that it is performed to a large extent on own responsibility after assignement with some choice of method. Occasionally develop own methods; 4. Have wide choice in selLClion, devel- A opment and roordinalion of methods within broad framework or general policies, MCROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES 0 1-3 4-7 B-10 Point Spread 0-10 no 1-3 Ir -7 8-10 Total Points ,;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA 1 I ;'f Maximum Total Points: 10 Maximum Assigned Points: —.8— RESPONSIBILITY 8_RESPONSIBILITY 4. Responsibility for Decisions This factor measures the relative responsibility for decision making on a job. Credit is based on the impact an incorrect decision could have on operations and the degree or authority and autonomy granted in the making of decisions. FACTOR DEGREES: 1. No independent decisions made without _ supervisory input; 2. Minor decisions are made without super- visor approval as they relate to day- to-day operational problems; 3. Major operational changes and decisions must be reviewed before implementation; 4. Discretion granted in responsibility for malting decisions that affect unit; S. Broad discretion in responsibility and authority granted in all aspects or decision making. Maximum Total Points: 10 Maximum Assigned Points: _8 - RESPONSIBILITY Point Total Spread Points 0-10 8 i i { { i I i t { i i { d I I ,;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA 1 I ;'f Maximum Total Points: 10 Maximum Assigned Points: —.8— RESPONSIBILITY 8_RESPONSIBILITY 4. Responsibility for Decisions This factor measures the relative responsibility for decision making on a job. Credit is based on the impact an incorrect decision could have on operations and the degree or authority and autonomy granted in the making of decisions. FACTOR DEGREES: 1. No independent decisions made without _ supervisory input; 2. Minor decisions are made without super- visor approval as they relate to day- to-day operational problems; 3. Major operational changes and decisions must be reviewed before implementation; 4. Discretion granted in responsibility for malting decisions that affect unit; S. Broad discretion in responsibility and authority granted in all aspects or decision making. Maximum Total Points: 10 Maximum Assigned Points: _8 - RESPONSIBILITY Point Total Spread Points 0-10 8 0 1-3 4-5 6-8 9-10 Point S. Responsibility for Adminslralion Spread This factor measures the responsibility for a 0-5 development, Implementation and administration of unit projects. Credit is based on how the Programs may require problem solving, creative- ness and schoduling. Additional measures identify the nature and extent of the joh holder's respon- sibility fur ohtaining results. It includes the amount or physical resources available and degrr:D of physical resourc:s available and degree of authority needed to utilize resources in reaching objectives. FACTOR DEGREES: 1. Responsibility for administration of _. 0 unit projects is generally given to immediate supervisor; MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLA13 CEDAR RAPIDS -DES HINES Total Points _JL_ r ;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES. IOWA 138 2. Some discretion granted in making recommendations for possible implemen- tation of activities; 3.. Responsible fur implementation of projects whose broad objectives have already been outlied without budget access; 4. Responsible for design and administra- i tion of new projects with budget access; 5. Responsibility for design, implemen- tation and administration of new projects with intended budget responsibilities and accountabilities. Maximum Total Points: 5 Maximum Assigned Points: 4 RESPONSIBILITY 6. Responsibility for Supervision This factor measures the responsibility which goes with the job for• supervising the work of others. It is not intended to appraise super- visory responsibility for results. The number of individuals directed shall be considered as those given immedoite guidance and also those indirectly assisted through channels. Credit Should be given to the degree of motivation exhibited by employees in the performance or their immediate responsibilities. FACTOR DEGREES: 1.. Responsible only for own work but may coordlante with others; 2. Responsible for instructing and direct- _ ing one or two helpers 50% or more of the time; 3. Responsible for instructing, directing _ or setting up for a small group of employees usually in the same operation, up to 10 persons; 4. Responsible for instructing, directing 5 and maintaining the flow of work, up to 20 persons. Maximum Total Points: 5 Maximum Assigned Points: 5 MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES 1101MES 1 2-3 4 5 Point Spread 0-5 0 1-2 3-4 5 Total Points _5 I j i �i r ;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES. IOWA 138 2. Some discretion granted in making recommendations for possible implemen- tation of activities; 3.. Responsible fur implementation of projects whose broad objectives have already been outlied without budget access; 4. Responsible for design and administra- i tion of new projects with budget access; 5. Responsibility for design, implemen- tation and administration of new projects with intended budget responsibilities and accountabilities. Maximum Total Points: 5 Maximum Assigned Points: 4 RESPONSIBILITY 6. Responsibility for Supervision This factor measures the responsibility which goes with the job for• supervising the work of others. It is not intended to appraise super- visory responsibility for results. The number of individuals directed shall be considered as those given immedoite guidance and also those indirectly assisted through channels. Credit Should be given to the degree of motivation exhibited by employees in the performance or their immediate responsibilities. FACTOR DEGREES: 1.. Responsible only for own work but may coordlante with others; 2. Responsible for instructing and direct- _ ing one or two helpers 50% or more of the time; 3. Responsible for instructing, directing _ or setting up for a small group of employees usually in the same operation, up to 10 persons; 4. Responsible for instructing, directing 5 and maintaining the flow of work, up to 20 persons. Maximum Total Points: 5 Maximum Assigned Points: 5 MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES 1101MES 1 2-3 4 5 Point Spread 0-5 0 1-2 3-4 5 Total Points _5 ;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA I i� 139 RESPONSIBILITY 7. Responsibility for Contacts This factor niea;ures the cota•tesy, Lact and persuasiveness required to maintain good relationships with people at all levels within the organization and to induce cooperation by personal or telephone communications with persr other than immediate supervisors or co-workers FACTOR DEGREES: 1. Little if any public contact or inter- _ departmental interaction; 2. Handles general public and inter- _ departmental interaxLion occasionally only; 3. Comes in contact with general public 4 continuously; 4. All contacts internally and with the _ general public are part of the job function. Maximum Total Points: 5 Maximum Assigned Points: 4 RESPONSIBILITY B. Responsibility for Confidential Data This factor measures the amount of access a job has to confidential data, the possible results of a breach of this confidentiality and the impac it could have on an individual, the City or the community as a whole. FACTOR DEGREES: 1. No contact with confidential data at _ any time; 2. Some contact with conficlentail data under close observation and supervision; 3. Complete and total access to data that could be damaging to other employees; 4. Complete and total access to data that _ 4 could be damaging to people and City operations; 5. Complete and total access that could be damaging to people, City operations and the entire cumtrmunity as a whole.. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RARIDS•DES 1101NES r ;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA — ----- -- 1'10 Maximum Total Points: 5 Maximum Assigned Points: 4 RESPONSIBILITY 9. Responsibility for Budgeting & Financial Control This factor measures the degree of budget and financial responsibility for the job. Credit is based on the job's ability to match performance with budgetary allocations, additional consideration relates to the relative degree of decision making and access to financial support given the job. FACTOR -DEGREES: 1. No responsibility for• budget and financial administration; 2. Respnsibility granted for recommending budget - no responsibility for admini- stration; 3. Responsibility for approval of expenses 4 only up to $250.00; 4. Total responsibility for administration of budget with no restrictions on amount, with guidelines. Maximum Total Points: 5 Maximum Assigned Points: 4 TOTAL POINTS ASSIGNED - ALL CATEGORIES: 76 MAXIMUM TOTAL POINTS - ALL CATEGORIES: 100 MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOINES Point Total Spread Points 0-5 I 0 1-2 3-4 5 t r A ;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB 141 • CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA JOTS I:VALUA I IHN FY70 P0SI1i0N:-__ Director --'.- DATE: CLASSIFICATION: SUPERVISORS & EXECUTIVES RANGE: EVALUATION COMPONENTS KNOWLEDGE This factor considers the education, knowledge and -- experience the worker must have to perform the job satisfactorily. It is measured by the complexity of practical knowledge the worker must possess whether it be gained by on -the -jab experience, prior training and education or both. It is limited by the nature of instructions received regarding the work task and by the amount of supervision received. Point Total 1. Pre-employment Training Ran a Points a. This factor is defined as the mental 1-18 development and general knowledge as acquired through schooling or self study required to absorb the specific training necessary for satisfactory per- formance on the job. b. Employment 'training & Experience. 1•17 Specific training and experience in addition to pre-employment training necessary to acquire proficiency in performing the duties of the job. The longer the period of training required the more responsibility is assigned. C. supervisory Experience 1-10 _ A measure of the supervisory experience required to adequately motivate employees in the accomplishment of departmental objectives. Maximum Total Points: 45 Maximum Assigned Points: 45_ FACTOR CEGPF.ES: Scope. of knowledge is measurer) by the Ievcl of experience obtained in each component and is measured by three. degrees: 1) elementary - entry- IDvel knowledge with minimal standards; 2) intermediate knowledge acquired through continued exposure to additional training in area of competence; 3) expert - advanced training and experience dealing with each level of professional competency in area of Concentration. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES ;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA r 142 Knowledge of: A. Pre-employment "I1•aining 1. High school plus two years college; 2. College degree; 3. Advanced graduate —18 degree; 4. Professional degree, i.e. law, engineering, medicine, etc. Point Spread 1-78 CaSLOI Intermediate Expert 1-5 6-10 11-18 Point Spreat 1-17 B. Employment Training and Experience Casual Intermediate Expert 1. None; 1-6 7-13 14-17 2. Three months to 1 year; _ 3. 1-3 years; _ 4. 4-7 years; 5. 8+ years. —T7 Point Spread 1-10 C. Supervisory Experience Casual Intermediate Expert 1, None; 1-3 4-7 8-10 2. Under 1 year; 3. 1-5 years; _10 4. 6-10 years; S. 10+ years. _ RESPONSIBILITY Point 2. Responsibility for Organizing & Planning SSpr•ead This factor is a measure of the jobs responsible 0-10 for organizing and planning departmental activities. It evaluates the degree of responsibility assigned for performance standards, accountability for achieving those standards and the authority for carrying out plans and pr•ocedur•es. Credit is based on the relative impact improper planning and organizing could have on the City administration and the ultimate effect on City residents. Particular attention Is given to -overall responsibility for planning the work flow so as to insure optimum utilization of human and monilary resources. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOINES Total Points 10 --,MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB `' • CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES II0It1ES 1143 w FACTOR DEGREES: ;.r 1. Organization and planning of activities 0 •, for approval of immediate supervisor, only. No direct responsibility; 2. Minimal responsibility for organizing 1-3 and planning activities as it relates -- "' to day-to-day uperations only. Long- term planning is the responsibility or the immediate Supervisor; 3. Responsibility and authority for maxi- mizing resources with occasional --- 4-7 exceptions refm'red to supervisor for I a decision; 1 ' 4, Complete authority and responsibility 10 8-10 for fiscal administration with little r\r .. direction From supervisor; borad objectives are generally outlined. r A, Maximum Total Points: 10 Maximum Assigned Points: 10 iPoint RESPONSIBILITY 3. Responsibility for Principals & Methods 'total 5 read Points ..P._ ! I This factur measures the initiative and indepen- 0-10 9 dent judgement required to design and Implement principles and methods that benefit the attain - 111011t of an efficient and effective operation. .% Emphasis is placed on transforming broad concep- teal techniques into workablerocetdur•es P geared � t . toward minimizing conflicts and duplication OF effort. FACTOR DEGREES: i 1. No direct responsibility for principles p methods; fcor 2. Follow established methods and prate- dares, refer all exceptions; — — i_3 3. Occasional since most duties are 4_7 repetitive and related, Standard .. instructions and procedures serve as guides. Unusual problems are referred r frequently with suggestions for car - 'rection. *the nature of the work Is such that it is performed to a large extent on awn respunsibilily after assignement with sortie choice Of method. Occasionally develop own methods; 4. Have wide choice• in selection, drvel- g 8-10 opment and coordination of methods within ^• F broad framework or general policies. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES II0It1ES I MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA 144 Maximum Total Points: Maximum Assigned Points: 9 RESPON: IUILITY 4. Responsibility for Decisions This factor measures the relative responsibility for decision malting on a job. Credit is based on the impact an incorrect decision could have on operations and the degree of authority and autonomy granted in the making of decisions. FACTOR DEGREES: 1. No independent decisions made without supervisory input; 2. Minor decisions are made without super- _ visor approval as they relate to day- to-day operational problems; 3. Major operational changes and decisions must be reviewed before implementation; 4. Discretion granted in responsibility B _ for malting decisions that affect unit; S. Broad discretion in responsibility and _ authority granted in all aspects of decision making. Maximum Total Points: '10 Maximum Assigned Points: B RESPONSIBILITY 5. Responsibility for Adminstra Lion This factor measures the responsibility for a development, implementation and administration of unit projects, Creditis based on how the programs may require problem solving, creative- ness and scheduling. Additional measures identify the nature and extent of the job holder's respon- sibility for obtaining results. It includes the amount of physical resources available and degree of physical resources available and degree of authority necdcd to utilize resources in reaching objectives. FACTOR DEGREES: 1. Responsibility for administration of unit Projects is generally given to immediate supervisor; MICRDFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES BOWES 0 PoinL Total Spread Points 0-10 B 0 1-3 4-5 6-8 •� 9-10 • I ' i i Point Total Spread Points 0-5 5 0 -,MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA 1 145 2. Some discretion granted in making 1 _ recommendations for possible implemen- tation of activities; 3.. Responsible Im• implementation of 2-3 projects whose broad objectives have. _ already been outlied without budget access; 4. Responsible for design and administra- 4 tion of new projects with budget access; S. Responsibility for design, implemen- 5 5 Latton and administration of new projects with intended budget responsibilities and accountabililias. Maximum Total Points: 5 Maximum Assigned Points: 5 RESPONSIBILITY G. Responsibility for Supervision Point Spread This factor measures the responsibility which 0-5 goes with the job for supervising the work of others. It is not intended to appraise super- visory responsibility for results. The number of individuals directed shall be considered as those given immudaite guidance and also those indirectly assisted through channels. Credit Should be given to the degree of motivation exhibited by employees in the performance of their immediate responsibilities. 17ACTOR DEGREES: 1. Responsible only for own work but may 0 _ coordlante with others; 2. Responsible for instructing and direct- 1-2 ing one or two helpers 50% or more of the time; 3. Responsible fur insu•ucting, directing 4 3-4 or setting up 1'()I' a small group of —' — employees usually in the same operation, Lip to 10 persons; 4. Responsible for instructing, directing 5 _ and maintaining the flow of work, up to 20 persons. Maximum Total Points: 5 Maximum Assigned Points: 4 MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES Total Points 4 r ,,;,MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES. IOWA I r- 146 RESPONSIBILITY Point Total 7. Responsibility for C.ontacts Spread Points This factor, measures the c01.11-te::y, tact and 0-5 5 persuasiveness required to maintain good relationships with people at all levels within the organization and to induce cooperation by ` personal or telephone communications with persons other than immediate supervisors or co-workers. I FACTOR DEGREES: 1. Little if any public contact or inter- 0 departmental interaction; 2. Handles general public and inter- ` 1-2 departmental interaxtion occasionally only; 3. Comes in contact with general public 3-4 continuously; 4. All contacts internally and with the ter_ 5 general public are part of the job i function. ! I Maximum Total Points: 5 Maximum Assigned Points: _5 RESPONSIBILITY Point Total B. Responsibility for Confidential Data Spread Points .i:. i This factor measures the amount of access a job 0-5 4 has to confidential data, the possible results of a breach of this confidentiality and the impact I' it could have on an individual, the City or the community as a whole. FACTOR DEGREES: 1. No contact with confidential data at 0 any time; 2. Some contact with confidentail data 1 under close observation and supervision; 3. Complete and total access to data that _ _ 2-3 P could be damaging to other employees; 4 �i 4. I Complete and total access to data that _ 4 could be damaging to people and City 'i operations; 5. Complete and total access that cruld be 5 damaging to people, City operations iand I i i i the entire community as A wholr,. i i i i I i I IICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB i CEDAR RAPIDS -DES FIOIIIES r- ;MIGROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA 147 Maximum Tolal I'ninl:: 5 Maximum Assigned Points: _4, RESPONSIBILITY Point Total 9. Responsibility for Budgeting & Spread Points Financial Control This factor measures the degree of budget and 0-5 _ S financial responsibility for the job. Credit is based on the job's ability to match performance with budgetary allocations, additional consideration relates to the relative degree of decision making and access to financial support given the job. FACTOR DEGREES: 1. No responsibility for budget and financial administration; 2. Respnsibility granted for recommending _ budget - no responsibility for admini- stration; 3. Responsibility for approval of expenses i only up to $250.00; 4. Total responsibi lily for administration q _ of budget with no restrictions on amount, with guidelines. Maximum Total Points: 5 Maximum Assigned Points: _ 5 TOTAL POINTS ASSIGNED - ALL CATEGORIES: 95 MAXIMUM TOTAL POINTS - ALL CATEGORIES: _ 100 MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOIIIES 0 1-2 3-4 5 r I t i ;MIGROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA 147 Maximum Tolal I'ninl:: 5 Maximum Assigned Points: _4, RESPONSIBILITY Point Total 9. Responsibility for Budgeting & Spread Points Financial Control This factor measures the degree of budget and 0-5 _ S financial responsibility for the job. Credit is based on the job's ability to match performance with budgetary allocations, additional consideration relates to the relative degree of decision making and access to financial support given the job. FACTOR DEGREES: 1. No responsibility for budget and financial administration; 2. Respnsibility granted for recommending _ budget - no responsibility for admini- stration; 3. Responsibility for approval of expenses i only up to $250.00; 4. Total responsibi lily for administration q _ of budget with no restrictions on amount, with guidelines. Maximum Total Points: 5 Maximum Assigned Points: _ 5 TOTAL POINTS ASSIGNED - ALL CATEGORIES: 95 MAXIMUM TOTAL POINTS - ALL CATEGORIES: _ 100 MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOIIIES 0 1-2 3-4 5 r i i I' I I j j I I I, I 4 p I w ... r 1� 'I! � I I I I I i I i ;,MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA 148 The analysis determined the following revisions and/or changes in classification. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOINES - � I !,I I I ,I i I I, I i I i i I I FROMSIFICATION TO i MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA 1979 JOB EVALUATION BENCH MARK POSITIONS GRADE �nnarvicorc OLD POSITION and Executing NEW POSITION . ASSIGNED POINTS MAX POINTS FROMSIFICATION TO SALARY DATA FROMLTO / 14 CDBG Coord. Same 74 100 53 / 14 1300/1982 15 Controller Same 78 100 53 / 15 1300/1982 15 Supt. Same 76 100 53 / 15 1300/1982 18 Director Same 95 100 56 / 17 1590/2528 MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES j I i i ii plan units as of 3-79. 1� I 'i �I I I I i p, City hierarcy with much emphasis on bargaining unit I . employees. Consequently, no formal program was developed for I i I I i ;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA i �. 150 Phase 3 - Administrative Pay Plan Guidelines A. Present City Pay Plans The following represents the City of Iowa City's various pay plan units as of 3-79. The pay plans were developed according to positions within the City hierarcy with much emphasis on bargaining unit employees. Consequently, no formal program was developed for non -bargaining unit employees resulting in inequity in policy as MI well as administration. The pay plan covers the following employees: American M Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, — Administrative, Confidential, Police and Fire. These plans were as follows: MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RANDS -DES 1101DES M1CROfILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA 1 RANGE - 1A 00 Library Ade - 01 15.1 CIl'i OF IOWA CITY AFSCME BARGAINING UNIT PAY PLAN APRIL 1, 1979 A B C Hrly 3.756 4.254 Biwk 300.48 340.32 Mo* 651.04 737.36 Ann 7812 48 8848 32 1* 01 Hrly 3.884 4.404 Clerk/Typist - 01 Biwk 310.72 352.32 Maint. Work. I-03 Mo 673.22 763.36 Prkg. Enf. Att.-04 Ann 8078.72 9160.32 Wtr. Meter Read. -05 i Library Clerk - 02 - 2* 02 Hrly 4.024 4.554 -I Keypunch Op. - 01 Biwk 321.92 364.32 Acct. Clerk - 02 Mo. 697.49 789.36 I Oup. Mach. Op. -03 Ann 8369.92 9472.32 3* 03 Hrly 4.163 4.716 j,Sr. Clk/Typ. - O1 Biwk 333.04 377.28 Animal Cont. Of -02 Mo 721.58 817.44 Sr. Lib. Clk.-03 Ann 8659.04 9809.28 7 Rec. Prog. - 05 j Supv. I 4* 04 Hrly 4.314 4.889 1 Bus Driver - 04 Biwk 345.12 391.12 Police Disp. - 02 Mo 747.76 847.42 Maint. Wkr. II -03 Ann 8973.12 10169.12 t 5* 05 i -1 Library Asst. - 01 Hrly 4.475 5.062 Biwk 358.00 404.96 Mo 775.66 877.41 II Ann 9308.00 10528.96 1 _ .J I � I i- D E F 4.404 4.554 4.716 4.889 352.32 364.32 377.28 391.12 763.36 789.36 817.44 847.42 9160.32 9472.32 9809.28 10169.12 4.554 4.716 4.889 5.062 364.32 377.28 391.12 404.96 789.36 817.44 847.42 877.41 9472.32 9809.29 10169.12 10528.96 4.716 4.889 5.062 5.247 377.28 391.12 404.96 419.76 817.44 847.42 877.41 909.48 9809.28 10169.12 10528.96 10913.76 t 4.889 5.062 5.247 5.443 391.12 404.96 419.76 435.44 847.42 877.41 909.48 943.45 10169.12 10528.96 10913.76 11321.44 a 5.062 5.247 5.443 5.650 404.96 419.76 435.44 452.00 i 877.41 909.45 943.45 979.33 10528.96 10913.76 11321.44 11752.00 j 5.247 5.443 5.650 5.858 419.76 435.44 452.00 468.64 909.48 943.45 979.33 1015.38 10913.76 11321.44 11752.00 12184.64 IIICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES IIOIIIES r "MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAS 1 ' RANGE A B • CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA 152 6* 06 Sr. Acct Clk.-03 Hrly 4.636 5.247 Maint. Wk. III -05 Biwk 370.88 419.76 Treat. Plant - 06 Mo 803.57 909.48 Operator I Ann 9642.88 10913.76 Hsg. Mgt. Aide -08 Trans. Operation's -09 Asst. 7* 07 Hrly 4.808 5.443 Tech. Asst. - 06 Biwk 384.64 435.44 Mech. I - 07 Mo 833.38 943.45 Ann 10000.64 11321.44 8* 08 Hrly 4.990 5.650 Sr Maint Worker -04 Biwk 399.20 452.00 Electrician - 05 No 864.93 979.33 Mechanic II - 06 Ann 10379.20 11752.00 Rec. Prog. Supv II - 08 Buyer - 09 Electronics Technician - 10 9* 09 Hrly 5.287 5.858 Lab Tech7- 12 Biwk 422.96 468.64 Rehab Fin. Spec -13 Mo 916,41 1015.38 Sr. Mechanic - 05 Ann 10996.96 12184.64 Hsg/Red Spec. - 07 i Librarian I - 03 Sr. Treatment - 06 Plant Op. 10* Hrly 5.485 6.089 } Spector Biwk 438.80 487.12 Shop Supr. - 04 Mo 950.73 1055.42 Ann 11408.80 12665.12 11* Hrly 5.704 6.320 fir. Eng. Tech -04 Biwk 456.32 505.60 Librarian II - 07 Mo 988.69 1095.46 Broadband Ann 11864.32 13145.60 Telecommunications Specialist C D E F 5.443 5.650 5.858 6.OP-n 435.44 452.00 468.64 487.1, 943.45 979.33 1015.38 1055.4k 11321.44 11752.00 12184.64 12665.12_ 5.650 5.858 6.089 6.320 452.00 468.64 487.12 505.60- 979.33 1015.38 1055.42 1095.4E 11752.00 12184.64 12665.12 13145.60 5.858 6.089 6.320 6.5;.. 468.64 487.12 505.60 525.92 1015.38 1055.42 1095.46 1139.4F- 12184.64 12665.12 13145.60 13673.9, 6.089 6.320 6.574 6.8�_ 487.12 505.60 525.92 548.0[- 1055.42 1095.46 1139.49 1187.33 12665.12 13145.60 13673.92 14248.00- 6.320 6.574 6.850 7.1( 505.60 525.92 548.00 568.K_- 1095.46 1139.49 1187.33 1231.36 13145.60 13673.92 14248.00 14776,32 6.574 6.850 7.104 7.39,7,1 525.92 548.00 568.32 591.45 1139.49 1187.33 1231.36 1281.45" 13673.92 14248.00 14776.32 15377.441 .i M 1 b M MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES I ' �MIGROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA WE STEP w. RANGE A B C D E F 5r. Librarian -03 -- *Each of these salaries may be escalated to reflect quarterly adjustments in the Consumer j Price Index. _Y *All monthly salaries are rounded down. I- i _1 _i i 11J f Y ti Tjt I' 1 1 ~ .'I j 2 ' 4.n 1 1 1 1 12* Hrly 6.165 6.850 7.104 7.393 7.693 7.98I Sr Const Insp-07 Biwk 493.20 548.00 568.32 591.44 615.44 638.48 Rehab/ConstSpec-06 Mo 1068.60 1187.33 1231.36 1281.45 1333.45 1383.37 13 Planner/Prog.-08 Ann 12823.20 14248.00 14776.32 15377.44 16001.44 16600.48 Analyst I NJ 19 13* Hrly 6.427 7.104 7.393 7.693 7.981 8.270 w Planner/Prog - 01 Biwk 514.16 568.32 591.44 615.44 638.48 661.60 Analyst II Mo 1114.01 1231.36 1261.45 1333.45 1383.37 1433.46 Civil Engineer -02 Ann 13368.16 14776.32 15377.44 16001.44 16600.48 17201.60 MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES I � I ' CITY OF IOWA CITY I f i I PAY PLAN JULY 1, 1978 RANGE TITLE MIN. MAX. j 01 Clerk/Typist - Confidential 41-01 $621/mo. $ 863/mo. 01 i 670 933 i 02 Word Processing Operator - Confidential 43-02 670 933 ,MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES IIOIIIES 15h CITY OF IOWA CITY CONFIDENTIAL EMPLOYEES PAY PLAN JULY 1, 1978 RANGE TITLE MIN. MAX. 41 43 01 Clerk/Typist - Confidential 41-01 $621/mo. $ 863/mo. 01 Sr. Clerk/Typ. - Confidential 43-01 670 933 43 46 02 Word Processing Operator - Confidential 43-02 670 933 01 Secretary - Confidential 64-01 1052 46 46 02 Sr. Account Clerk - Confidential 46-02 .751 751 1052 46 03 Sr. Bus Driver - Confidential 46-03 751 1052 48 04 Deputy City Clerk - Confidential 46-04 751 1052 49 01 Sec'y. to City Manager. - Confidential 48-01 813 1141 01 Civil Rights Specialist - Confidential 49-01 937 1291 MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES IIOIIIES r ;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA I MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES 11010ES 15S CITY OF IOWA CITY ADMINISTRATIVE PAY PLAN JULY 1, 1978 MIN MAX GROUP I 51 875 1193 51 04 Word Processing Supervisor - 04 01 Animal Control Supervisor - 01 02 Library Technical Services Supervisor - 02 03 Library Circulation Services Supervisor - 03 GROUP II 52 1050 1431 52 01 Housing Rehabilitation Supervisor - 01 03 Senior Housing Inspector - 03 04 Assistant Superintendent - 04 Energy Coordinator _. GROUP III 1100 1749 j 53 01 Program Coordinator Block Grant - 01 02 Development Coordinator - 02 Sr. Building Inspector 04 Refuse Superintendent - 04 05 Cemetery/Forestry Superintendent - 05 06 Parking System Supervisor - 06 07 Street Superintendent - 07 08 Park Superintendent - 08 09 Equipment Superintendnet - 09 - 10 Administrative Assistant - 10 11 Librarian - Children's Services - 11 12 Personnel Specialist - 12 -J 13 Recreation Superintendent - 13 14 Treasurer - 14 ^� 15 Traffic Engineer - 15 16 Assistant to City Engineer - 16 17 Purchasing Agent - 17 18 Controller - 18 "j 19 Transit Manager - 19 f 20 Housing Coordinator - 20 21 Senior Planner - 21 22 Assistant City Attorney - 22 { 23 Adult Services - 23 24 Assistant City Manager - 24 i GROUP IV 1300 1982 54 01 Pollution Control Superintendent - 01 I 02 Water Superintendent - 02 ..� 03 Assistant City Engineer - 03 GROUP V 1430 2279 55 01 City Engineer - 01 i MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES 11010ES -MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA i i L56 GROUP VI 56 1590 2528 56 06 Public Works Director - 06 02 Finance Director - 02 01 Community Development Director - 01 05 Police Chief - 05 08 Fire Chief - 08 03 Human Relations Director - 03 07 Library Director - 07 04 Parks and Recreation Director - 04 09 Housing and Inspection Services Director/ - 09 Building Official UNCLASSIFIED 60 60 02 City Clerk $18,500 - 02 01 City Manager 34,344 - 01 City Attorney 37.50 or $42.50/hr. on retainer 90 Temporary, Part-time, Full-time, summer help Bargainina Unit Position Status 1 - General 1 - Permanent Full-time 2 - Fire 2 - Permanent Part-time 3 - Police 3 - Temporary Full-time 4 - Library 4 - Temporary Part-time 9 - Exempt 5 - Special Programs - CETA - Mayor's Youth MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES t10INEs t I I j i 01 j i i i { I j JJI _ I fl I _i I I I I I ;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB , • CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA 157 POLICE CONTRACT PAY PLAN JULY 1, 1978 RANGE TITLE 31 01 POLICE OFFICER - 31-01 Beginning Salary 12 mo. 18 mo. 36 mo. 54 mo. Hrly. 5.175 5.314 6.370 6.981 7.512 Bi -wkly 414.00 425.12 509.60 558.48 600.96 Mo. 897 921 1,104 1,210 1,302 Ann. 10,764 11,052 13,248 14,520 15,624 32 01 POLICE SERGEANT - 32-01 Minimum Maximum Hrly. 7.725 8.377 Bi -wkly 618.00 670.16 Mo. 1,339 1,452 Ann. 16,068 17,424 33 01 POLICE CAPTAIN - 33-01 Minimum Maximum Hrly. 8.377 9.289 Bi -wkly 670.16 743.12 Mo. 1,452 1,610 Ann. 17,424 19,320 34 01 DEPUTY POLICE CHIEF - 34-01 Minimum Maximum Hrly. 9.289 10.148 Bi -wkly 743.12 811.85 Mo. 1,610 1,759 Ann. 19,320 21,108 56 05 CHIEF* - 56-05 Minimum Maximum Hrly. 10.148 14.066 Bi -wkly 811.85 1,125.23 Mo. 1,759 2,438 Ann. 21,108 29,256 *This salary range is established for the purpose of computing pension of retirees. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES IIOIMES ;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA 158 FIRE DEPARTMENT PAY PLAN APRIL 1, 1979 Bargaining Unit Members: FIREFIGHTER 21-01-( A B C D E F Hrly 3.936 4.109 4.286 4.463 4.665 4.867 Biwkly" 440.84 460.21 480.04 499.86 522.48 545.11 Mo 955.00 997.00 1040.00 1083.00 1132.00 1181.00 Ann 11460.00 11964.00 12480 12996.00 13584.00 14172.00 LIEUTENANT 22-01-( )-2-1 Hrly 4.867 5.086 5.320 Biwkly 545.11 569.64 595.84 Mo 1181.00 1234.00 1291.00 Ann 14172.0 14808.00 15492.00 CAPTAIN 23-01-( )-2-1 Hrly 5.320 5.547 5.798 Biwkly 595.84 621.27 649.38 Mo 1291.00 1346:00 1407.00 Ann 15492.00 16152.00 16884.00 "Each of these salaries may be escalated not more than 1/2X per quarter depending upon increases in the Consumer Price Index. Battalion Chief ) 24-01-08-9-1 Fire Marshal ) 25-01-08-9-1 Training Officer ) 26-01-08-9-1 MIN MAX Hrly 7.956 9.087 Biwkly 636.46 726.92 Mo 1379.00 1575.00 Ann 1654d.00 18900.00 Chief" 56-08-08-9-1 Hrly 9.087 11.775 Biwkly 726.92 942.00 No 1575.00 2042.00 Ann 18900.00 24492.00 "This salary range is established for the purpose of computing pension of retirees. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES r ;MICROFILMED BY JORM MiCROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA 159 B. Revised City of Iowa City Pay Plan The following City of Iowa City pay plan represents a combination of the previous units with much continuity of pay scale and admini- stration. Attention is focused on all City employees and the development of a manageable system with incentive for career growth. The City pay plan contains 19 grades for various position groupings. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOINES i i ea j I I. 1 J I I r ;MICROFILMED BY JORM MiCROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA 159 B. Revised City of Iowa City Pay Plan The following City of Iowa City pay plan represents a combination of the previous units with much continuity of pay scale and admini- stration. Attention is focused on all City employees and the development of a manageable system with incentive for career growth. The City pay plan contains 19 grades for various position groupings. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOINES i i f ` ' Proposed Salary Range I $ 640-$ 889 per month 1A $ 668-$ 860* I $ 690-$ 894 2 $ 714-$ 926 3 $ 716-$ 997 �j $ 738-$ 960 4 $ 765-$ 996* t{ $ 780-$1084 I $ 793-$1032* $ 819-$1141 6 $ 850-$1112* I �M i 7 $ 850-$1112 $ 955-$1181* 8 $ 882-$1156* i I' ! I j I I I � I � I -, MICROFILMED BY DORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA 16o Grades 1 through 8 Include office and clerical workers with salary ranges — as per the following: Grade Proposed Salary Range Trainee: $ 640-$ 889 per month 1A $ 668-$ 860* 1 $ 690-$ 894 2 $ 714-$ 926 3 $ 716-$ 997 �j $ 738-$ 960 4 $ 765-$ 996* t{ $ 780-$1084 5 $ 793-$1032* $ 819-$1141 6 $ 850-$1112* I �M $ 813-$1194 7 $ 850-$1112 $ 955-$1181* 8 $ 882-$1156* *Represents project union rate as of 7-1-79. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOINES 4 � � M I ul t� �j E t{ .1 I a� I �M ;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA rail 161 Grades 1 through 9 includes skilled and unskilled workers with the following salary ranges: Grade Proposed Salary Range w $ 690-$ 894* 4 $ 765-$ 996 i $ 820-$1072* 7 $ 850-$1112 8 is 9 $ 933-$1204 Id V . i II e 1 r I rIi i I i J j III' I i r I II Y 1� I i � y F I i I i i i � i 3 ;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA rail 161 Grades 1 through 9 includes skilled and unskilled workers with the following salary ranges: Grade Proposed Salary Range 1 $ 690-$ 894* 4 $ 765-$ 996 6 $ 820-$1072* 7 $ 850-$1112 8 $ 882-$1156 9 $ 933-$1204 *Represents projected union wage rate as of 7/1/79. Grades 9 through 13 include all professional and technical occupations and are as follows: Grade Proposed Salary Range 9 $ 897-$1302* $ 933-$1204* $ 936-$1276 10 $ 968-$1248* $1264-,$1381 $1000-$1390 MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES a ;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA 162 11 $1100-$1529 _ $1006-$1298* I' i f j I I And, finally, grades 14 through 18 include all supervisory and executive - f f it II 1 i i i I i i i i I% 1 1 1 ;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA 162 11 $1100-$1529 _ $1006-$1298* 12 $1085-$1400* 13 $1131-$1450* And, finally, grades 14 through 18 include all supervisory and executive - personnel. Their ranges are as follows: Grade Protected Salary 14 $1400-$1900 .. i i $1381-$1505 15 $1480-$2026 `^ 6i I $1484-$1860- 16 $1530-$2392 FI ..1 j $1610-$2415 .9 ; 17 $1800-$2702 The total pay plan combined is as follows: MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOVIES � I I i i � k • 12 $1085-$1400* 13 $1131-$1450* And, finally, grades 14 through 19 include all supervisory and executive i y I Projected Salary I 14 $1400-$1900 - $1339-$1630 15 $1480-$2026 $1484-$1860 16 $1530-$2392 ' d 1 I I I 1 I I z I �t E 11 MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA 162 11 $1100-$1529 $1006-$1298* • 12 $1085-$1400* 13 $1131-$1450* And, finally, grades 14 through 19 include all supervisory and executive personnel. Their ranges are as follows: i Grade I Projected Salary I 14 $1400-$1900 - $1339-$1630 15 $1480-$2026 $1484-$1860 16 $1530-$2392 i $I630-$2051 ' 17 $1800-$2891 The total pay plan combined is as follows: MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES IIOIIIES r ;,MIGROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 110171F.S I Reflects orojected rates as of C1 TY OF IONA CITY 7/1/19. NadlleoOtIsmdeto project wage rates beyond that AOM I N I S T P, AT I VE PAY PLAN period due to cost of living adjustrents. FY 1980 POSITION GRADE UNIT TITLE MIM I Mum MIO -POINT MAXIMUM tra l are A Clerk/typist 1 640.00 764.00 889.00 i IA U Library Aldrt •668.00 774.00 780.00 806.00 874.00 866.00 A Clerk/typist 11 670.00 185.00 900.00 I U Clerk/lypIst •690.00 780.00 806.00 874.00 864.00 894.00 I U Maintenance Yorker I • U Parking EnforceaMnt Attendant U Yater Meter Reader U Library Clerk I 2 U Keypunch Operator •714.00 806.00 874.00 864.00 89600 926.00 U Account Clerk U Duplicating Machine Operator 7 A Word Processing Operator 716.00 856.00 997.00 A Addnistratire Clerk/typist U Aninal Control Officer •778.00 874.00 864.00 89.4.00 926.00 960.00 U Senior Library Clerk p. U Recreation Program Supervisor 1 w 7 I I U Senior Clerk/typist - 1 A Deputy City Clerk 780.00 972.00 1084.00 A Clerk -Stena 1 MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 110171F.S Or A i r I ...MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB �i CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA i I i PGSIT10B GRACE UNIT tl7ll - ML9IMUM M1040I4T MAXI" UAT. 4 U But Drleer •765.00 064.00 894.00 926.00 960.00 996.00 7 U Police Dispatcher s, U Maintenance Yorker 11 } " 5 U library Assistant •797,00 894.00 926.00 960.00 996.00 1072.00 'I A Secretary I 819.00 980.00 1141.00 l 1 A Clerk-Stmo II 71 rr 6 A Adninislntlre Account Clerk 847.00 1011.00 1184.00 iA Secretary 11 U Senior Account Clerk •820.00 926.00 960.00 996.(W0 1012.00 1072.00 U Maintenance Porker III U Treateaent Plant Operator I U Housing Management Aide 000 U Transit Operation Assistant � 7 U Technical Assistant •850.00 960.00 996.00 1072.00 1012.00 1112,00 U mechanic 1 -- A Adelntstratlre Secretary 865.00 1049.00 1274.00 A Senior Bus Orleer 1 I d U firefighter •1012.00. 1067.00 1113.00 1159.00 1711.00 1264.01) 1 U Buffer •882.00 996.00 1072.00 1072.00 1112.00 1156.00 y i U Senior Maintenance Worker U El.trltlan U Mechanic It {4t I U Electronic Technician 1 I L I� I I i MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOINES Or A i htiMJCROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA �I I POS IT IOM GRACE UNIT TITLE j 9 U Police Officer U Recreation Program Supervisor I7 U Laboratory Technician - U Senior Mechanic U Llbrarian 1 U Senior Treat.ent Plant Operator U Rehab. Finance Specialist A Administrative Assistant 10 U Building Inspector U Housing Inspector U Shop Supervisor U Lieutenant A Library Circulation Supervisor A Aninal Control Supervisor A Yard Processing Supervisor M IM IMW4 •90p.nn 9BS.nn •933.00 1032.00 936.00 •968.00 1072.00 176a.nn 1000.00 11 A Library Technical Services Supervisor 1100.00 - A AiNrmaelve Action Comllance Specialist A Assistant Superintendent A Energy Coordinator U Senior Engineering Technician •1006.00 1112.00 U Librarian 11 - U Broadband Teleconanunications Specialist 12 U Rehabilitation Officer •I DOS. 00 1204.00 U Planner/Program Analyst 1 ' U v Sr. Construction Inspector 611CROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES IIOIIiES MIO -POINT MAXIMUM 1131.00 ;,95.601 7A9..gO 1072.00 1112.00 1 1156.00 1204.00 1106.00 1 1204.00 1276.00 1248.00 i 1112.00 1156.00 �\ 1320.00 1781.00 � 1195.00 1390.00 1529.00 i I L 1714.00 1156.00 1204.00 1248.00 1298.00 r j rn 1750.00 1450,00 f 1248.00 1298.00 r GRADE 13 14 ,LMICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES. IOWA A Senior Cent A CO8G CoonL A ee4n I A n9 Coo A LibrarAn-C'. A LibrarSen-A Battalion Ci A Training 0/ A Controller A Treasurer A Assistant C A Budget Admil M:MIMiM M10 -POINT MAXIMUM •1171.00 1248.00 1298.00 1350.00 1400.00 1450.00 1181.00 1236.00 1291.00 1400.00 1650.00 1900.00 POSITION ON IT TITLE u Senior Librarian U Planner/Program Analyst II Cie 11 Engineer U Fl re Lieutenant A Senior H ng Inspector A Senior Sul kiln Spector A Pun'asing Agent A Senior Planner A Personnel Analyst A Assistant City Attorney I A Assistant City Engineer A Parting System Supervisor U Fin Captain A Police Sergeant A Senior Cent A CO8G CoonL A ee4n I A n9 Coo A LibrarAn-C'. A LibrarSen-A Battalion Ci A Training 0/ A Controller A Treasurer A Assistant C A Budget Admil M:MIMiM M10 -POINT MAXIMUM •1171.00 1248.00 1298.00 1350.00 1400.00 1450.00 1181.00 1236.00 1291.00 1400.00 1650.00 1900.00 MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA � I POSITION GRADE UNIT TITLE ,'.;. ,i 13 U Senior Librarian U Planner/Program Analyst II :I U Civil Engineer U Fire Lieutenant MINIMUM MID -POINT MAXIMUM •1131.00 1248.00 1298.00 1350.00 1400.00 1450.OU 1181.00 1278.00 1291.00 14 A I i 1 i i i I i Senior Building Inspector i 1 MINIMUM MID -POINT MAXIMUM •1131.00 1248.00 1298.00 1350.00 1400.00 1450.OU 1181.00 1278.00 1291.00 14 A Senior Housing Inspector 1400.00 1650.00 1900.00 A Senior Building Inspector A Purchasing Agent A Senior Planner A Personnel Analyst A Assistant City Attorney i A Assistant City Engineer A Parking System Supervisor B Fire Captain I3al.00 1440.00 1505.00 A Police Sergeant 1179.00 1484.00 1670.00 IS A Senior Center Coordinator 1480.00 1757.00 2026.00 A CDBG Coordinator A Redevelopment Coordinator A Housing Coordinator A Librarlan-Children's Services A Librarian -Adult Services A Transit Manager A Traffic Engineer A Controller A treasurer A Assistant City Attorney II A nudn4t ArMlnlltralar MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES r- vMICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA 1 1484.00 MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES IIORIES 1670.00 1961.00 1860,00 2251.00 1860.00 2792.00 2051.00 3191.00 1✓Jn PCs IT ION j • GRADE OMIT TITLE CONT. i IS A Transit Manager A Fire Marshall A Traffic Engineer A Cemetery/Forestry Superintendent A Street/Sanitation Superintendent A Park Superintendent A Recreation Superintendent i A ERuipront Superintendent I A Pollution Control Superintendent A Mater Superintendent A Police Captain 1 6 A �1 ant City Manager A Assistant Cit t may 111 A-- -_-- Deputy Pollen Chleef 17 A Planning A Program Development D' A Finance Director A Mousing 6 Inspections Director ' A Hunan Relations Director A Library Director A Parks A Recreation Director .-. A Public Works Director A 10 it CMef , I``II i r A Fin CAlef �i f T i 1484.00 MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES IIORIES 1670.00 1961.00 1860,00 2251.00 1860.00 2792.00 2051.00 3191.00 1✓Jn MID -POINT MAAINUM 1484.00 MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES IIORIES 1670.00 1961.00 1860,00 2251.00 1860.00 2792.00 2051.00 3191.00 ( -,MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA � �1 I I I i I I POSIT IN I Ge01 Uh li TITLE I � 1! WICLASSIFIED I - i City Clerk i g City Manager 1' 7 City Attorney MID•PUIMT :Ui1IMUM f� I MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB iCEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES ;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA MIO -POINT MAXIMUM 1617.00 17S6.00 1614,00 1795.00 1965.00 2792.00 I i ' .ORAOE UXI7 1966.00 1 2891.00 MINIMUM 1 CONT. 15 A Battalion Chief A Training Offlcer 1475.00 A Fire,Unhall I ' A Cemetery/Forestry Superintendent i A Street/Sanitation Superintendent j A Park Superintendent A Recreation Superintendent j A Equipment Superintendent I. '. A Pollution Control Superintendent A Water Superintendent A Police Captain ISSi.00 J 16 A' A City Ingp near XaneBer � A AssiCitystant tantCit Av isiant CItY Attorney IIf 1570.00 A Deputy Police Chief 1670.00 17 A Planning B Program Oevelapment Director 1600,00 A Finance Director I. A Mousing B Inspections Director A Muman Relations Director A Library Director L. A Parks 1 Recreation Director A Public Work, Director A Police Chief 1 A Fire Chief 1757.00 I j i 1 t MIO -POINT MAXIMUM 1617.00 17S6.00 1614,00 1795.00 1965.00 2792.00 1640.00 1966.00 2545.00 2891.00 219A.00 2664.00 21155.00 1175.011 ' MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOVIES f E ,.MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA r1 169 Only those positions outside of bargaining units were recommended for position classification changes. New positions added to the pay plan were: Clerk Steno I, Clerk Steno II, Administrative Secretary, Assistant City Attorney Il, Assistant City Attorney III and Budget Administrator. Position changes in the system are: - Senior Clerk Typist - changed to Administrative Clerk Typist - Senior Account Clerk - Changed to Administrative Account Clerk - Civil Rights Specialist - changed to Affirmative Action Compliance Specialist - Personnel Specialist - changed to Personnel Analyst - Administrative Assistant - reclassified at Range 9 of the Pay Plan. While the pay plan recognizes extended ranges for all employees and bring non -bargaining unit employees in line with projected cost of living increases for union members, It does not necessarily suggest that all employees will be extended to the and of the grade range maximum. On the contrary, a salary administration and a performance appraisal program has been designed to accompany the new pay plan. It is designed to accurately and fairly administer the new City pay classification system awarding those employees that merit reward and recognizing those employees that do satisfactory work. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOIRES I A I i i i i i n i � 1 i I i I i I E ,.MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA r1 169 Only those positions outside of bargaining units were recommended for position classification changes. New positions added to the pay plan were: Clerk Steno I, Clerk Steno II, Administrative Secretary, Assistant City Attorney Il, Assistant City Attorney III and Budget Administrator. Position changes in the system are: - Senior Clerk Typist - changed to Administrative Clerk Typist - Senior Account Clerk - Changed to Administrative Account Clerk - Civil Rights Specialist - changed to Affirmative Action Compliance Specialist - Personnel Specialist - changed to Personnel Analyst - Administrative Assistant - reclassified at Range 9 of the Pay Plan. While the pay plan recognizes extended ranges for all employees and bring non -bargaining unit employees in line with projected cost of living increases for union members, It does not necessarily suggest that all employees will be extended to the and of the grade range maximum. On the contrary, a salary administration and a performance appraisal program has been designed to accompany the new pay plan. It is designed to accurately and fairly administer the new City pay classification system awarding those employees that merit reward and recognizing those employees that do satisfactory work. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOIRES I A a I i i u d I is9 t 1-, II i iI I I..1 I i I11 1 1 I r ­IMICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA 170 Phase 4: Salary Administration Guidelines - City of Iowa City A. Salary Administration Program The purpose of the Salary Administration Program of the City of Iowa City is three -fold: 1) to pay salaries that are equitable In relation to the level of work performed; 2) to pay salaries that are comparable to salaries paid for similar work in the occupation and area; and, 3) to pay salaries that will compensate an individual for his/her performance. The program has four primary elements: 1. Annual Adjustment Increases; 2. Merit Adjustment Increases; 3. Exceptional Service Increases; and 4. Accelerated Salary Increases. FIICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES i i i i 't I i i I r pay structure. Any annual adjustment increase declared by the City will be designated as either an annual inflationary adjustment to offset loss in purchasing power as a result of inflation or an annual administrative r .MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA I•(I I. Annual Adjustment Increases Annual Adjustment Increases are increases in an employee's rate of pay that may be given as the result of a complete annual review and increase in the City's overall pay structure. Any annual adjustment increase declared by the City will be designated as either an annual inflationary adjustment to offset loss in purchasing power as a result of inflation or an annual administrative _ adjustment geared toward any changes that may have �- occurred in the classification structure. An annual administrative adjustment is generally the result of a pay plan and salary structure survey. rl 2. Merit Increase Adjustment I: A Merit Increase Adjustment is designed to reward the employee who is performing satisfactorily. Merit increases are based upon the following factors: performance since last increase, potential for future advancement. Merit �+ increases will be available to all employees within a t M i department provided satisfactory performance warrants such an increase and shall not exceed 5-7.5 percent per ki person. 'Phe City Mnntwe-r reserves the right, to determine 6he roux Luurn nl Int+nbie. inr.rcu:;e, oval L+ble. 1'or mr. rtl.ortouD inrrementn at thp. beginntTw of enrh fi :col year. � 1 R� MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES IIOIRES i w a I., I I � , - , y i � � I i I I i � j I I, j ;- I I ,MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB i • CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA 172 3. Exceptional Service Increase Exceptional service increases are designed to recognize and reward excellent performance by an employee within a department. Factors to be considered are: performance, contributions to departmental objectives, tangible results of individual efforts. This type of increase can go to no more than five percent of the average number of personnel within the department. Exceptional service increases range from 7.5-10. percent per person. 4. Accelerated Salary Increases This type of Increase is to be used only for outstanding performance and contributions by an employee over an annual timeframe. Accelerated Salary Increases may fall at any point within the salary range provided this does not conflict with federal or state statutes, granted that the employee's education and experience fall within specified guidelines. Accelerated Salary Increases may be given. only on an annual basis at the beginning of the calendar year and collectively may not exceed more than one percent of the total City personnel budget. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOIRES I , i ' i i I I i , i I i , i I -;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB i 173 • CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA Performance criteria for the aforementioned increases are detailed in the following section: B. Performance Appraisal System A performance appraisal system for the City of Iowa City was designed to fairly and adequately evaluate City employee performance. The very nature of municipal government and the standards that have been set insofar as performance is concerned dictates that a performance appraisal 1) reflect the nature of the task at hand; 2) be easily administered and 3) finally reflect the objectives of maximum service delivery within the budgetary constraints that are part of a municipal administration. To this end a revised performance appraisal system has been designed for the City of Iowa City in order to recognize the various levels of administration within the City and its relationship to accountabilities. Three levels have been identified within the performance appraisal system itsel. Level one refers to all clerical and office personnel. Level two refers to all skilled and unskilled workers, transit drivers, etc. And, level three and four refers to supervisory and managerial personnel. An example of each form to be used in the appraisal of employees within the City follows. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES IIOIDES -MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA 174 /1 ITY OF IOWA CITY CENTER 410 E. WASHINGTON ST IOWA CITY IOWA 52240 (319) 354.180D .DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SYSTEM SEE:PERIOD COVERED: FROM_ TO CLASSIFICATION: TYPE OF APPRAISAL: S �I IDENTIFIED BELOW, LIST THOSE EL IMS OF THE POSITION THAT RELATE TO EACH FACTOR, AND THE EMPLOYEE'S PERFORMANCE IN THAT CATEGORY. b FACTOR POSITION FUNCTION aw ' Is employee care- USE OF EQUIP- 0 I less or negligent? MENT AND TOOLS Can he/she handle dyw" pa� ti I ..i without damage a Has employee 1 w. -MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA 174 /1 ITY OF IOWA CITY CENTER 410 E. WASHINGTON ST IOWA CITY IOWA 52240 (319) 354.180D .DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SYSTEM SEE:PERIOD COVERED: FROM_ TO CLASSIFICATION: TYPE OF APPRAISAL: jZeRrE; RATE THE EMPLOYEE ACCORDING TO THE APPRAISAL FACTORS IDENTIFIED BELOW, LIST THOSE EL IMS OF THE POSITION THAT RELATE TO EACH FACTOR, AND THE EMPLOYEE'S PERFORMANCE IN THAT CATEGORY. b FACTOR POSITION FUNCTION aw ' Is employee care- USE OF EQUIP- wog mea less or negligent? MENT AND TOOLS Can he/she handle dyw" pa� ti equipment tools without damage a Has employee INDIVIDUAL I No. of Job Related been involved SAFETY & SAFETY Accidents: in careless OF OTHERS accidents? Been No, of Injuries: repeatly injured in I&XtQ13HU1Qd_af_AutAea7_• No. of Times Absent: RELIABILITY No. of Times Tardy: Total excused: r Is employee courteous l to all? Aware of nature of public COURTESY employment? LEVEL I MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES J D►=JCJ r ;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA I INVIDA JOB STNW�MIDERATIX -. LIST THOSE STANDARDS APPLICABLE TO PERFORMANCE OF IHIB. JOB ONLY WHICH ARE IMPORTANT FACTORS IN ASSESSING THE EMPLOYEES PERFORMANCE, ii t�1 Ihj al �9 ni { I SUPERVISOR'S COhfeM: �I i EwLOYEE'S CO eM.' INCREASE IZECE1fM mm: YES NO TYPE: how: i % ) SIGNAIXtE OF EMPLOYEE DATE SIGNATURE OF SUPERVISOR DATE MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES DOIIIES r ;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB i • CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA CITY CSF IOWA CITY CIVIC UNIHI 410 E. WASHINGTON SI IOWA CIIY IOWA 57140 (319) 354 13(1) i, DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL 1 PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SYSTEM ° EMPLOYEE Nm PERIOD COVERED; FRAM_ TO POSITION: CLASSIFICATION: RAME; TYPE OF APPRAISAL: I RATE THE EDPLOYEE ACCORDING TO THE APPRAISAL FACTORS IDENTIFIED BELOW, LIST THOSE ELEMENTS OF THE POSITION THAT RELATE TO EACH FACTOR. I D�04, a I I I i ..1 t ! ' 1 P 1�1 t` r, S� S �I i � FACTOR POSITION FUNCTION Is work neat, ❑ r7 I 0 accurate & ACCURACY OF WORK PERFORMED ❑ C7 precise? ❑ ❑ ❑ Is employee ❑ courteous to COURTESY all? Does employee discuss con- MAINTENANCE OF fidential CONFIDENTIALITY matter .0 others? Does employee need constant DISPLAY OF ALERTNESS reminders7 6 CONCENTRATION IN Follow instructions PERFORMANCE OF DUTIES Is employee No. of times constantly late? RELIABILITY absent Excessive absences? No, of times tardy Total excused � we y ❑ r7 I 0 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ C7 = ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Tan/pr TY MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOVIES I ,MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA I �. SPECIFIC ACTIVITIES FOR FUTURE COMPLETION ACT IV I TY Target Date i I SUPERVISORS COM FMS: EMPLOYEE'S COM4EPITS: j INCREASE REcwmNDED: YES ND TYPE: AMOUNT: C 9 ) f i M SIGNATURE OF EWLOYEES DATE SIGNATURE OF SUPERVISOR DATE MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES FIOIIIES i I I I i I 1, I I I i i j i I i I I ,MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA I �. SPECIFIC ACTIVITIES FOR FUTURE COMPLETION ACT IV I TY Target Date i I SUPERVISORS COM FMS: EMPLOYEE'S COM4EPITS: j INCREASE REcwmNDED: YES ND TYPE: AMOUNT: C 9 ) f i M SIGNATURE OF EWLOYEES DATE SIGNATURE OF SUPERVISOR DATE MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES FIOIIIES I t , I i E i i I i i I 1 i � I ,.-MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB I • CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA _~ CITY CSF ICW/-'\ CITY CIVIC r .EI ITER 410 E WASHINGTON ST I( -)WA CITY IOWA 52240 Q19J 35413C(. DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL ' M I �1 I � i I � 1 I ' ! � t PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL „j SYSTEM M Ewe WE: PERIOD C(NEM;FW4__— To I PbsITION: CLASSIFICATION: RANGE: f Iii TYPE OF APPRAISAL: f i i i I t Mr MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES _MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA 1 MANAGEMENT APPRAISAL PROGRAM ACCOUNTABILITIES LIST THE END RESULTS FOR WHICH THIS POSITION IS HELD ACCOUNTABLE AS COVERED IN THE POSITION DESCRIPTION: LIST SPECIFIC PROJECTS OR PROGRAMS TARGETED FOR COMPLETION SINCE THE PREVIOUS EVALUATION PERIOD: MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES r ;,MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA I �1 ASSESSMENT OF PERFORMANCE DATE OVERALL ASSESSMENT o� 0 c ? DESCRIPTION OF RESULTS ACHIFVED I ,.;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA SPECIFY ACTIVITIES FOR FUTUf AMPLETION: SUPERVISOR'S CM4ENTS: I EMPLOYEE'S COM4ENTS: I INCREASE RECawmED: YES NO TYPE: Now: SIGNAURE OF EMPLOYEE DATE SIGNATURE OF SUPERVISOR DATE MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES FMDIlIES (MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA i 177 CONCLUSION The aforementioned material and analysis represents the combined efforts of a number of City departments including, of course, the Department of Personnel, the Department of Finance, and all department directors and division heads who were so cooperative in responding to the sometimes extremely tight deadlines. Thanks is also given to the Iowa Association of Firefighters, Local 610, AFL- CIO, Nathan B. Hopkins, President, whose response to the I questionnaire was very helpful, and finally, to the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, Local 183, and to former President Lora Ileff. Any questions concerning the analysis conducted or the results therein can be directed to the Human Relations Department. i 1. I I. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOINES ;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA 1 1'18 APPENDIX A JOB.DESCRIPTION QUESTIONAIRE MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOINES --MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB i rf9 CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA Date: April 10, 1979 0O To: All Department Directors v� From: Patricia S. Brown, Numan Relations Director Re: Job Analysis Confidential and Managerial Employees One of the top concerns expressed by managers and employees alike during the recent departmental analysis, centered around our current wage and uncovered that rare administration attributablem to any overal le lack eof Policies and direction in this area. The first step in developing a sound salary/classification program begins with an internal analysis of the positions within the organization. Phase one of our program will additionally concentrate on non -bargaining unit employees. Our internal analysis will be conducted vis-a-vis the attached questionnaire. Each employee within your jurisdiction, including yourself, must completly fill out an individual questionnaire which generates specific information regarding job duties. This questionnaire is subsequently reviewed by the department director in question and then forwarded to the Human Relations Department. Once the data is received from each department, a position description and specification will be developed for each position analyzed in concert, of course, with department and division managers. From this process, an improved classification plan will emerge consistent with regional, national and area position and salary norms. A natural career path geared toward promotion, incentives and training will also be developed. Although there is an enormous amount of work involved, the end results will benefit employees and managers alike primarily through a consistent program of salary administration. At this point, it is imperative that bargining unit employees do not receive the questionnaire until such time that the unions have had an opportunity to review the questionnaire for content. I would appreciate receiving this completed questionnaire by Thursday, April 19, 1979. Thank you for your cooperation in completing this study and if there are any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me. bj2/9 MICROFILMED DY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOIRES r ;.MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA City of°Iowa Cit'- •- MEMORANDUM Date: April 27, 1979 To: All Department Directors 1 From: Patricia S. Brown, Director of Human Relations Re: AFSCME Bargaining Unit Job Analysis Questionnaire On April 19, 1979, a meeting was held with Laura Iliff, President, American Federation of State, County and Municipal employees, Local 183, regarding the City's current job analysis questionnaire. Mrs. Iliff agreed to the distribution of the questionnaire to all AFSCME bargaining unit employees. She has already made contact with each union steward within Local 183 and employees who have questions or concerns regarding the validity of the questionnaire should contact their steward for information and clarification. Additionally, each division or appropriate union steward is to review the questionnaire prior to submission of the questionnaire to this office, in concert with their respective supervisor or division head. When the survey is completed I will sit down with Mrs. Iliff concerning the results of the survey in order to facilitate mutual understanding on the part of both management and our union which is an exclusive bar- gaining unit. Please make sure that your department questionnaires are returned by May 7, 1979, so we may reach our June 1 deadline. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter and if there are any questions please don't hesitate to contact me.. cc: Laura Iliff jm5/7 I I MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 110111ES MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES ;h11CROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA I' City of Iowa Ci., MEMORANDUM Date: April 27, 1979 To: All American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employee Bargaining Unit Employees J From: Patricia S. �N Brown, Director of Human Relation��� Re: Job Analysis Questionnaire i i t A meeting was held on Wednesday, April 11, 1979, with Laura Iliff, President, Local 183, American Federation _ I of State, County, and Munic- ipal.Employees, concerning the distribution of a job analysis ques- tionnaire to all AFSCME bargaining unit employees. On Tuesday, April 19, 1979, this office received official union sanction and j concurrence regarding the distribution of this questionnaire to its bargaining unit members. _I These questionnaires are to be completed and reviewed by both your union steward and division head or supervisor prior to submitting the ques- tionnaire to this office. Any questions pertaining to the validity of the questionnaire should be directed to your union steward for clari- fication. I i We are requesting that all questionnaires be submitted by May 7, 1979, in LI -; order to complete the process by June 1, 1979.T hank you very much for your cooperation and assistance in this L� matter and If I can be of any help or assistance please contact me. jm5/4 v . J Ii rl i fI I � I I Yi I1 f F 1 N I I MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES ;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA i 182 CITY OF IOWA CITY Job Description Questionnaire DATE DEPARTMENT PRESENT JOB TITLE AND GRADE GROUP OR DIVISION { — SUPERVISOR'S NAME 1. Describe major duties of your job: 2. Other, less important job duties: i i 1 J { I 3. List machines or equipment you use: Continually i } f y ij e r.. I i { 157.— MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES i I ;MICROFILMED BY JODI MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA i 103 Frequently Occasionally 4. flow much formal education is necessary to do this job (check _ one): Less than high school school _High _High school plus one year of other schooling I _High school plus 2-3 years of other schooling _. _College degree 4 years major _College degree plus other schooling 5. List other additional specialized courses, subjects or training which are necessary but which are not easily available in high — school or college: f I I 6. How much previous, similar or related work experience is i necessary for a person starting this job? _None _Less than three months Three month to one year --1-3 years _3-5 year 1, _5-10 years NICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOINES ;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB • CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA 18h 7. How long should it take an employee with the necessary education and previous experience (as shown above) to become generally familiar with details and to do this job reasonably well? Two weeks or less _Three months Six months _1 year _2 years or more 8. What amount of supervision does this job ordinarily require (check one); _Frequent; all but minor variations are referred to supervisor. _Several times daily to report or to get advice and/or assignments. _Follow established methods and procedures; refer exceptions. _Occasional, since most duties are repetitive and related, standard instructions and procedures serve as guides. Unusual problems are referred, frequently with suggestions for correction. _Limited supervision. The nature of the work is such that it is performed to a large extent on own responsibility after assignment, with some choice of method. Occasionally develop own methods. _Broad objectives are outlined. Work is judged primarily on overall results with much choice of method. Frequently develop methods to achieve desired results. _Little or no supervision. Have wide choice in selection, development and coordination of methods within broad framework of general policies. 9. What are the nature and scope of any independent decisions you make? 10. Are your decisions to approve ususally approved before becoming effective? If so, by wham? 11. Are your decisions to reject usually reviewed before becoming effective? If so, by whom? MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOINES ;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA 1 12. What effect would an incorrect error in judgement have on the operation of your department? 13. In what ways does this job require resourcefulness, originality and/or initiative; give examples. 14. What kinds of errors are likely to occur on this job? — 15. Now are such errors ordinarily checked or discovered? i i 16. What would be the effect of such errors if not caught? 1 I � 1 i ... 17. Check the extent of contacts you have regarding the City's business: j Employees and other units of the company: Continually Method: _Frequently Phone _Occasionally —Letter _Never =In person Policy holders and/or agents: ` _Continually Method: _Frequently Phone _Occasionally —Letter _Never In person i j i MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOINES -MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA i H 186 General public; community or trade and professional associations: Method: _Continually Frequently Phone —Letter —Occasionally _Never _In person Federal and state government agencies: Method: _Continually _Phone _Frequently Occasionally Letter _Never _In person Other (please specify): —' Method: _Continually Frequently _Phone _Occasionally Letter — _Never =In person 18, If the minimum visual alertness required is more than normal, . check one in each column: 1 Close i _Highly concentrated periods of short duration —Occasional, but with occasional breaks j _Frequent Steady and sustained , ,j 19. Describe any muscular action, body movement, working positions or posture changes occurring while performing duties which ... result in unusual fatigue. Estimate percentage of time in each. 20. Indicate any disagreeable job conditions to which you are exposed, such is dirt, noise, water, fumes, heat, outside weather, monotony, accident hazards, etc. i i I i MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES a r ;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB • CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA 187 21. If YOU travel overnight on the job, indicate approximate times per month and method: 22. Approximately how many miles per month do you drive in doing this job? 23. Answer only if you are responsible for the work of others. Check below those supervisory responsibilities which are a part Of this job: _Instructing _Assigning work _Reviewing work _Planning work of others _Maintaining standards _Coordinating activities _Allocating personnel Acting on employee problems _Selecting new employees _Transferring, promoting; recommend or approve _Disciplining; recommend or approve _Discharge; recommend or approve _Salary increases; recommend or approve 24. List job titles which are under your direct supervision and the number of employees in each: Show total number of employees, including those just above, over which you have supervisory authority: MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOIRES ,MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA 1 i 188 25. Additional Comments: IForm completed by: f NAME -- TITLE i Note to supervisor: Your signatiure below indicates that you have wed reviethe above ,job description. If you desire to make revisions, j please enter them in redep ncil in the cppropriate spaces. If needed, use additional sheets, numbering yr.ur comments to match the items in question. These items will be reviewed with you before a final job description is prepared. Now many employees under your J supervision do the jobs describe above? Reviewed by: NAME i TITLE j iI i 1 a. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES IIOIIIES I I ;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB 1 • CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA � J 174�I parks & recreation department MEMO to: from: Neal Berlin Dennis Showalter re: Management Compensation date: June 13, 1979 Committee recommendations The flan] mccLing (fur FY 79) of the Manngmn:•nt Cumpcnnntlon Committee was held „ un .lune S, 1979 with Pat Brown also present. A.L.I. members rucclved cuples of the pro— •+ posed new pay plan on May 30. If members had questions, they were to be submitted li to Pat in writing by 1 p.m. of .lune 1, so that she would have time to prepare a response. A number of changes were made on .lune 5; all of the committees recotmnendatl.ons M regarding classification changes are in the present pay plan. We urge you to accept i1 the plan, and recommend that the council adopt the pay plan, as proposed. a I Our recommendations regarding salaries, additional benefits, time away from work t•. and severance benefits are as follows: 1. That every management employee receive a $104 per month Cost of Living increase for FY 80, effective July 1, 1979. j x 2. That every management employee is elegible for a merit salary increase of up I to 52 of current salary, until the employee ronchen Lho top of their pay range.'- 3. That vacation days be increased to 22 days per year, and that vacation accum- ulations be Incruascd to 44 days. 4. That a deferred compensation plan be put Into effect as early as possible. , We suggest that the Finance Director pick a sound company wLth a good track record, and that each employee have the option of having payroll deductions forwarded to this company, i- It is the desire of the team to continue to serve as an advisory group to 1 " you on all matters relating to management compensation. Pat Drown has agreed to refer all matters regarding compensation policy to us for a recommendation. , We wish to thank Pat Brown for considering our concerns, and to congratulate her and her department for performing a mountainous task in a short period of time. i Respectfully submitted, ..; e• Lolly Iiggers Jim Bracktel Kevin Keck Iinrvey Miller Mike Kucharzik �^ Dennis Showalter, Chairman M � ' f� 1 M ' MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOVIES ;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOVIES 1377 r. ,r 18 r f� Ii i� LJ IJ J MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOVIES 1377 ;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB 1 • CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS Sealed proposals will be received by the City Clerk of the City of Iowa City, Iowa, until 2:00 P.M. on the 28th day of June, 1979, and opened immediately thereafter, for the construction of RIVER CORRIDOR SEWERS as described in the plans and specifications therefor, now on file in the Office of the City Clerk. Proposals will be acted upon by the City Council at a meeting to be held at the Council Chambers, Civic Center, Iowa City, Iowa, on the 3rd day of July, 1979, or at such later time and place as may then be fixed. The work to be done and the materials to be used are as follows: RIVER CORRIDOR SEWERS j Construct approximately 21,600 linear feet of sanitary and storm sewer in open cut', 8" through 54" in diameter; river crossing; street crossings in open cut; jacking or augering of pipe; manholes; special structures; drop connections; connections to existing sewers; removal and abandonment of existing sewers; removal and replacement of sewer service pipe and connections; appurtenances; street surface removal; street surface replacement by Subcontractor; miscellaneous concrete replacement; surface restoration; granular backfill; special protection and handling of existing utilities; construction near railroad trackage and right-of-way; special construction procedures and miscellaneous associated work, including cleanup. The method of construction for said improvements shall be by contract in accordance with the plans and specifications and general stipulations for said improvements approved by the City Council. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOMMIES 7/0 ;,MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA 1 The City reserves the right to reject any or all bids and to waive informalities and to select the bid deemed to be to its best interest. Contract will be awarded to the lowest responsible bidder. Each proposal shall be made out on a blank form furnished by the municipality and must be accompanied, in a sealed envelope, by either (1) a certified or cashier's check, drawn on a solvent Iowa bank or a bank chartered under the laws of the United States, in an amount equal to 5% of the bid, or (2) a bid bond executed by a corporation authorized to contract as a surety in the State of Iowa, in a penal sum of 5% of the bid. The bid security should be made payable to the TREASURER OF THE CITY OF IOWA CITY, IOWA. The Bid security must not contain any conditions either in the body or as an endorsement thereon. The bid security shall be forfeited to the City as liquidated damages in the event the successful bidder fails or refuses to enter into a contract within 10 days after the award of contract and post bond satisfactory to the City insuring the faithful fulfillment of the contract and the maintenance of said work, if required, pursuant to the provisions of this notice and the other contract documents. Bidders shall use the bid bond form bound in the specifications. Bidders will be required to comply with the President's Executive Order No. 11246. The requirements for bidders and contractors under this order are explained in the Federal grant documents. Bidders will be required to comply with a goal -oriented system for involvement of minority business enterprise in the work under the contract as provided for in 40 I FIICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES IIOIRES i I s n d i I I i i - i J ;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB • CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA CFR 35.936-7 and Policy for Increased use of Minority Consultants and Construction Contractors, 43 FR 60220 et. seq., and the EPA Region VII Implementation Plan. The City has established a minimum goal for this contract of not less than four percent (48) of the total bid. Bidders shall complete the applicable certification attached to the proposal stating that the bidder is (1) a minority business enterprise, or (2) a minority -majority joint venture and the minority party in said joint venture will perform at least four percent (48) of the dollar amount of the work, or (3) that the bidder will use at least four percent (48) of the contract funds for subcontracting a portion of the work to minority business enterprise(s). The certification shall include a listing of said enterprises, the work and estimated dollar amount to he performed by each such enterprise, and the percentage of the total bid to be used for minority business enterprises. Each bidder must fully comply with the requirements, terms, and conditions of the EPA. Region VII MBE requirements, including the use of a goal -oriented system for increased minority business participation. The bidder commits itself to the goals for minority business participation contained herein and all other requirements, terms and conditions of these bid conditions when it submits a properly signed bid. By virtue of statutory authority, preference will be given to products and provisions grown and coal produced within the State of Iowa, and to Iowa domestic labor, to the extent lawfully required under Iowa Statutes; provided that the award of contract will be made to the lowest responsible bidder submitting the lowest responsive bid, which shall be determined without regard to state or local NICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOIIIES r -MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB i CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA law whereby preference is given on factors other than the amount of the bid. The Council reserves the right to defer acceptance of any proposal for a period not to exceed sixty (60) calendar days from the date of letting. On the basis of the bids received, the City Council will propose award for River Corridor Sewers. Final award will not be made until the proposed award is approved by the Department of Environmental Quality of the State of Iowa and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. It is anticipated that such approval will be made within sixty (60) days after application for approval of the proposed award. The successful bidder will be required to furnish a bond in an amount equal to one hundred percent (1009) of the contract price, said bond to be issued by responsible surety approved by the City Council and shall guarantee the faithful performance of the contract and the terms and conditions therein contained and the maintenance of improvements in good repair for. not less than two (2) years from the time of acceptance of the improvements by the City. i The work under the contract shall commence within ten (10) days after date set: forth in written Notice to Proceed and shall be completed within five hundred forty (540) consecutive calendar days. Liquidated damages in the amount of Five Hundred Dollars ($500.00) per calendar day will be assessed for each day that work shall remain uncompleted after the end of the contract period, with due allowance for extensions of the contract period due to conditions beyond the control of the Contractor. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES I -IMICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB I • CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA Payment for the improvements will be made by the City in cash from such funds as may be legally available including cash on hand, proceeds from the sale and issuance of Sewer Revenue Bonds, proceeds from a Federal grant under the provisions of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended, proceeds from a State grant, or proceeds from the sale and issuance of general obligation bonds. Neither said Sewer Revenue Bonds, nor said contracts to the extent payable therefrom or from grant proceeds, shall constitute a general obligation of the City or be payable in any manner from taxation. At least ten (10) days before each progress payment falls due (but not more Often than once a month), the Contractor will submit to the Engineer a partial payment estimate filled out and signed by the Contractor covering the work performed during the period covered by the partial payment estimate and supported by such data as the Engineer may reasonably require. If payment is requested on the basis of materials and equipment not incorporated in the work but delivered and suitably stored at or near the site, the partial payment estimate shall also be accompanied by such supporting data, satisfactory to the Owner, as will establish the Owner's title to the material and equipment and protect his interest therein, including applicable insurance. The Engineer will, within ten (10) days after receipt of each I partial payment estimate, either indicate in writing his approval of payment and present ithe partial payment estimate to the Owner, or return the partial payment estimate to the Contractor indicating in writing his reasons for refusing to approve payment. In the latter case, the Contractor may make the necessary corrections and resubmit the partial payment estimate. The Owner will, within ten (10) days of presentation to him MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES EI -;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB • CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA i1 of an approved partial payment estimate, pay the Contractor a progress payment on the basis of the approved partial payment estimate. The Owner shall retain ten (10) percent of the amount of each payment until final completion and acceptance of all work covered by the contract documents. The Owner at any time, however, after fifty (50) percent of the work has been completed, if he finds that satisfactory progress is being made, shall reduce total retainage to five (5) percent of payments claimed. When the work is substantially complete (operational or beneficial occupancy), the retained amount shall be further reduced below five (5) percent to only that amount necessary to assure completion. A cash bond or irrevocable letter of credit may be accepted in lieu of all, or part of the cash retainage when it reaches five (5) percent or less. On completion and acceptance of a part of the work on which the price is stated separately in the contract documents, payment may be made in full, including retained percentages, less authorized deductions. The request for payment may also include an allowance for the cost of such major materials and equipment which are suitably stored either at or near the site. Prior to substantial completion, the Owner, with the approval of the Engineer and with the concurrence of the Contractor, may use any completed or substantially completed portions of the work. Such use shall not constitute an acceptance of such portions of the work. The Owner shall have the right to enter the premises for the purpose of doing work not covered by the contract documents. This provision shall not be construed as relieving the Contractor of the sole MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES 110IOE5 rr B ;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB • CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA responsibility for the care and protection of the work, or the restoration of any damaged work except such as may be caused by agents or employees of the Owner. Upon completion and acceptance of the work, the Engineer shall issue a certificate attached to the final payment request that the work has been accepted by him under the conditions of the contract documents. The entire balance found to be due the Contractor, including the retained t percentages, but except such sums as may be 1 lawfully retained by the Owner, shall be r1 paid to the Contractor within thirty (30) days of completion and acceptance of the work. The Contractor will indemnify and save the owner or the Owner's agents harmless from all claims growing out of the lawful demands of subcontractors, laborers, workmen, mechanics, materialmen, and furnishers of machinery and parts thereof, equipment, tools, and all supplies, incurred in the furtherance of the j performance of the work. The Contractor I shall, at the Owner's request, furnish satisfactory evidence that all obligations , of the nature designated above have been paid, discharged, or waived. If the Contractor fails to do so the Owner may, after having notified the Contractor, either pay unpaid bills or withhold from the Contractor's unpaid compensation a sum j I of money deemed reasonably sufficient to pay' any and all such lawful claims until I satisfactory evidence is furnished that all liabilities have been fully discharged whereupon payment to the Contractor shall be resumed, in accordance with the terms of the contract documents, but in no event j shall the provisions of this sentence be construed to impose any obligations upon the Owner to either the Contractor, his I i Surety, or any third party. In paying any i i, ;i i MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB + CEDAR RANDS -DES MOVIES ;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB I • CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA unpaid bills of the Contractor, any payment so made by the Owner shall be considered as a payment made under the contract documents by the Owner to the Contractor and the Owner shall not be liable to the Contractor for any such payments made in good faith. If the Owner fails to make payment thirty (30) days after approval by the Engineer, in addition to other remedies available to the Contractor, there shall be added to each such payment interest at the maximum legal rate commencing on the first day' after said payment is due and continuing until the payment is received by the;Contractor. Plans and specifications governing the construction of the proposed improvements have been prepared by VEENSTRA & KIMM, Engineers & Planners, of West Des Moines, Iowa, which plans and specifications and the proceedings of the City Council referring to and defining said improvements are hereby made a part of this notice and the proposed contract by reference, and the proposed contract shall be executed to comply therewith. Copies of said plans and specifications and form of contract are now on file with the City Clerk and may be examined in her office at Iowa City, Iowa. Copies may be obtained from VEENSTRA & KIMM, Engineers & Planners, 300 West Bank Building, 1601 22nd Street, West Des Moines, Iowa 50265, upon deposit of Fifty j Dollars ($50.00) for each set. Plan deposits will be refunded in full provided the documents are returned in good condition, free of mark-up within twenty (20) days after date of letting. i Plans and specifications may be examined at F. W. Dodge plan rooms in the following cities: Des Moines, Minneapolis, Omaha, Kansas City, Chicago and Denver. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES 110PIES l ;hIIIROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA I ' t 7 Published upon order of the City Council of Iowa City, Iowa. CITY OF IOWA CITY, IOWA By: Robert A. Vevera, Mayor ATTEST: By: Abbie L. Stolfus, City Clerk MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES tdo EllEs n 1. ,'IL?IED BY JDRM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA i "ICROFILMH BI JORM MICROLAB I _MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA I i City o4 Iowa Cr i MEM OK AOL M Im DATE: June 29, 1979 TO: City Council FROM: City Manager RE: Material in Friday's Packet i s { Copy of letter to Attorney General Tam Miller from the City Manager regarding- the alleged discriminatory practices at Woodfields. 13 72 f?s Memorandum from the Transit Manager regarding SEATS supplemental taxi service.-= Memoranda from the Department of Public Works: a. Funding for Ralston Creek Projects 1 b. Bricks at the Service Building a c. Ralston Creek Property j d. Plastic Turning Arrows 8 e. Newsprint pickup �3g6 I f. Rear Loading Garbage Trucks vs. Side Loading Garbage Trucks 11% Memorandum from the Directors of Public Works and Planning and Program Development regarding alleys located east of Gilbert Street and north of Friendship Street. /1397 Memoranda from the Department of Planning and Program Development: !' a. Black 64 Hotel Development 1?ffA 7 b. Boat Ramp Sites i Letter of resignation from Assistant City Attorney Bob Bowlin. Y.990 Copy of letter from League of Iowa Municipalities regarding the National:lgl League of Cities Annual Convention. i i Minutes of staff meetings of June 13 and June 20. 1.29 a The Building Line, Volume 22, June 1979 1993 7 Plaza Previews, Volume 2, No. 4 1,394 Article: Local governments can be run cheaper and better. 13 2i_ 1 r is MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB ! i CEDAR RAPIDS-DES FIOInES r ,PIICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB • CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA City of Iowa Ci� MEMORANDUM DATE: June 29, 1979 TO: City Council FROM: City Manager RE: Informal Agendas and Meeting Schedule July 2 1979 Monday 1:30 - 5:00 P.M. 1:30 P.M. - PAD 1750 Rochester - Planning and Program Development, Planning and Zoning Commission 2:00 P.M. - Council agenda, Counciltime andSenior Council comer mittee anningorts 2:30 P.M. - Approve preliminary plans and Program Development 3:00 P.M. - Authorized rebidding of Urban Renewal Hotel Project - City Manager 3:30 P.M. - Discuss City Pay Plan - Human Relations July 3 1979 Tuesday_ 7:30 P.M. - Regular Council Meeting - Council Chambers July 16 1979 Monte 1:30 - 5:00 P.M. 1:30 P.M. - Review zoning applications agenda, il 2:30 P.M. - SanitarySCouncil ewerSystemFacility nPlan unccommittee reports Public Works 3:00 P.M. - Leaf Burning Policy - Fire Department 3:30 P.M. - Executive session - Pending litigation 4:00 P.M. - Consider f Appealsl,ts to UnitedhActionnfor Youth Boaand rd, Parksmon, Board of App and Recreation Commission, and Committee on Community Needs. July 17 1979 Tuesdy 7:30 P.M. - Regular Council Meeting - Council Chambers PENDING ITEMS Northside Study Area Transportation Study Presentation on new Art Gallery - July 1979 Appointments to Housing Commission and Committee on Community Needs - August 14 MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES / MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA 1 S ^" M T W TH F S 1 2 3 4 6 7 SAM -Magistrates AM -Magistrates Court (Chambers) Court (Chambers) 1:30PM-Informal HOLIDAY •30PM-Housing Comm Council (Conf Rm) (Conf Room) 7:30PM-Informal 7:30PM-Council (Chambers) •30PM-PSZ Formal P&Z (Conf Room) (Chambers) 8� 9 10 11 12 13 14 SAM -Magistrates Court (Chambers) LOAM -Staff MeetingBAM-Ma istrates Clerk 4:30PM-Resources (Conf Room) Court(Chambers)1(Coon-City (Genf Room) Consery Comm (Conf Room) q M -Desi n Review SAM-Housin A eal Room) (Rec Center) Board (Conf 7:30PM-Parks 6 Rec Comm (Rec Center) 7PM-United Action for Youth (Friend 5 16 17 18 19 20 21 AM -Magistrates 4.30PM-Broadband OAM-Staff Meeting BAM-Magistrates Court (Chambers) Telecommunication (Conf Room) Court (Chambers L. -In orm Comm (Conf Room) •30PM-Senior Cent 7.30PM-Airport Council (Conf Rm) 7:30PM-Council Comm (Conf Room) Comm (Conf Room) •30PM-Informal (Chambers) 7:30PM-PSZ Formal PSZ (Conf Room) (Chambers) 23 24 25 26 27 28 8AM-Magistrates Court (Chambers) 4:30PM-Resources LOAM -Staff Meeting 8AM-Magistrates Conserv Comm (Conf Room) court (Chambers) (Conf Room) 4PM-Design Review 4PM-Librate Bd Com (Rec Center) (Lib Auditorium) 4PM-Bd of Adjust- ment (Chambers) 29 30 31 BAM-Magistrates Court (Chambers) 1:30PM-Informal 7:3OPM-Council Council (Conf Rm) (Chambers) 7:30PM-Informal PBZ (Conf Room) MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 110111ES c ;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA , CITY OF 10\NA CiTY :JVIC (J. NU,' dSI K wd/\ i;ll`/, I(_%r//1 ?,`A 18U) June -21, 1979 The Honorable Tom Miller Attorney General State Capitol Building 1007 East Grand Des Moines, Iowa 50319 Dear Mr. Miller: The Iowa City Human Rights Commission is investigating alleged charges of discriminatory admission practices by the management of Woodfields, a local Iowa City disco. The incidents are reported to have occurred on Saturday, June 23, 1979, involving excessive "carding" of Black residents, while requiring a mini- mum identification of white residents seeking admittance. This carding took place under the guise of preventing access by minors. Complaints received by the Human Rights Commission and staff allege that many of the citizens denied entrance were well over 18, and one or more over the age of 40. The Human Rights Commission and staff received the complaints on Monday, June 25, 1979, and investigation is proceeding on a priority basis. The City Council of Iowa City met in regular session the night of June 26, 1979. Many citizens were present to voice their outrage and to encourage the Council to act immediately in suspending the liquor license of Wood - fields Disco. However, neither the City Code nor the State Statute will allow such discretionary punitive action apart from a public hearing and a showing of conclusive evidence that the alleged offense actually occurred The City Council and staff are of the opinion that this is an extremely serious allegation. if substantiated, it is clear that an act of pure dis- crimination in its grossest proportions has occurred. The City favors the most immediate action possible to protect all citizens from such alleged blatant discriminatory practices. Pursuant to this end, the City Council has directed, by formal motion, that the Attorney General and the Iowa Civil Rights Commission be asked to become involved in this natter by utilizing the applicable State Statutes in seeking immediate, temporary relief while the Iowa City Human Rights Commission completes its investigation. An injunction filed in the Johnson MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MONIES 1319 l ;,MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB 1 CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES. IOWA The Honorable Tom Miller June 27, 1979 Page 2 County District Court directing the management of Woodfields to cease and desist any further alleged discriminatory activity against any segment of th6 population would certainly serve this purpose. We are of the opinion that it is within the authority of the Attorney General's office to pursue such court action immediately. We are confident that an injunction of this type would serve well to inform I potential offenders that neither the City of Iowa City nor the State of Iowa will tolerate unlawful discriminatory practices of any kind and that we are ready and willing to act ilnnediately on behalf of all persons who become the victims of such discrimination. This issue is presently in the forefront in Iowa City and I assure you that it is perceived to be a very serious one. In addition, there can be i little doubt regarding the impact it will have, on a state-wide basis as well. Since the State is the ultimate licensing authority for liquor establishments, we would thus conclude that the Attorney General's office would have a special interest in this matter. It is necessary that we all act jointly and expe- ditiously to investigate this issue and seek a final resolution at the earliest possible time. We will be gratified to know that the Attorney General and the Iowa Civil I (lights Commission view this matter as seriously as we do and are willing to j become involved on behalf of all citizens of the State of Iowa. We await your positive response and anticipate your prompt attention regarding s this matter. f v Sincerely yours, IOWA CITY CITY COUNCIL IOWA CITY HUMAN RIFTS COMMISSION Neal G. erlin, City Manager ti is it cc: Mr. Thomas Mann, Iowa Civil Rights Commission 8 Iowa City City Council Iowa City City Attorney Iowa City Human Rights Conmission MICROFILMED BY I JORM MICROLAB I, i CEDAR RAPIDS -DES I10111ES ;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB • CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA City of Iowa Cluj MEMORANDUM = DATE: Jun128, 1979 TO: Neal Berlin, City Manager j FROM: Hugh Mose, Transit Manager ?��17A/ \ ( 1 RE: SEATS Supplemental Taxi Service "''CGCG j Regarding rumors of the possible discontinu ce of SEATS Supplemental Taxi Service, apparently the story got started after I advised Don Kral of the Better Cab Company that due to financial considerations we might not be able to continue the program into FY80. When we first got word of the cutback in State assistance, it looked like we would have to tighten our belts, and the taxi program, being relatively new, would be a likely victim of cost- cutting. Recent developments lead me to believe that the pro- gram could be maintained in FY80 although at a reduced level. We have $2900.00 available in our Aid to Agencies budget; this would fund the Supplemental Taxi Service at $240.00/month, plus $50.00/month for dispatching. I am told by both Don Schaefer of Johnson County SEATS and Wayne Draper of Better Cab that the program is working fine, and has been very well received by the eligible public. i I I r 1 MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES I101DE5 1380 -MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB I • CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA 'City of Iowa Cit a •kt 1' Date: June 27, 1979 To: Ralston Creek o i ting Committee From: Dick Plastino . Re: Funding for Ralsto reek Projects Future property acquisition nd construction on -Ralston Creek will be accomplished by three general methods: 1. Construction contracts and property acquisition funded by Federal monies. 2. Construction contracts and property acquisition funded by local taxes (General Obligation Bonds). 3. Work done by a City -directed crew funded from local monies. The Ralston Creek channel is divided into nine different sections for purposes of analysis. The work program presented will also be broken into the same nine sections. The method of accomplishing the work and the funding source is indicated below. The priority of funding will be indicated by a number ahead of the sheet number and title of each section of the creek. All property acquisition would be funded out of a reserve fund which should be set up at the beginning of the program. Priority 1 - Sheet 2 - Channel Improvements U.S. Highway6 to Rock Island Railroad All projects in this area will be funded by the Federal Small Cities Grant Program. All property acquisition will be done by the City staff and all construction projects will be by competitive bidding contracts. Priority 2 - Sheet 3 - Rock Island Railroad to Washington Street All projects from the Rock Island Railroad to Gilbert Street are also included in the Federal Small Cities Grant Program. Priority 3 - Sheet 8 - F Street to Memory Gardens Cemeter Local Tax Money: Excavate and enlarge the channel section $169,000 from F Street to First Avenue. Place fill to form landform at First Avenue. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES 1381 I I Place stone riprap and sod on both banks $125,000 l i I Add new 7' x 20' steel arch culvert on $ 90,000 west side of existing culvert at F Street. I i Add new 7' x 20' steel arch culvert on I: I I I I north side of existing culvert at Fourth E r ;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA 2 MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES HOMES Place stone riprap and sod on both banks $125,000 from F Street to First Avenue. Add new 7' x 20' steel arch culvert on $ 90,000 west side of existing culvert at F Street. Add new 7' x 20' steel arch culvert on $ 25,000 north side of existing culvert at Fourth Avenue. Extend existing 8' x 18' culvert 50 feet $ 20,000 upstream at First Avenue. Construct siphon -type storm outlet from $ 15,000 First Avenue culvert. Place trench drain at Upland Avenue and $ 30,000 curb inlets. j. Relocate water and sewer lines. $ 17,000 By City Work Crews: Removal of debris at First Avenue. ' Flood -proof all sanitary manholes in the Included in yearly cost flood plain; clean the silt out of the for crew and equipment }: large box culvert on Muscatine Avenue. ;i Priority 4 - Sheet 6 Glendale Court to Sheridan Avenue Local Tax Money r; WORK PROJECT DOLLAR AMOUNT Channel excavation and placement of $ 82,000 fill to form berm. Placement of stone riprap and sod on $ 46,000 channel banks. Removal of debris and rubble from $ 4,000 Sheridan Avenue box culvert. General landscaping including tree $ 22,000 removal and replacement. Construction of gabion wall south $ 11,000 of Center Avenue and Sheridan Avenue. Installation of storm sewers along $ 30,000 Center Avenue. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES HOMES r i i I f i f i j i I. r -.;.MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB • CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA 3 Installation of stormwater pump station. Purchase house at corner of Court and Muscatine. Purchase or move two garages. By City Work Crews: Clean large rock and debris from entrance, channel floor and exit of Sheridan Avenue and Center Avenue bridges. Raise sidewalk on Sheridan Avenue. $ 80,000 $ 60,000 (reserve fund) $ 10,000 (reserve fund) Included in yearly cost for crew and equipment Priority 5 - Sheet 7 - Sheridan Avenue to F Street Local Tax Monev: Clear brush and debris from channel banks $ 60,000 in railroad area and place stone riprap and sod on channel banks. Place gravel on the channel bottom in the railroad area. Remove or relocate three garages $ 20,000 (reserve fund) encroaching on the floodway. Purchase floodway easements near $ 20,000 (reserve fund) Sheridan Avenue and G Street. Acquire three houses. $225,000 (reserve fund) Straighten channel and provide wider $ 10,000 cross-section. Construct small land form on west side $ 10,000 of creek to F Street to 7th Avenue. By City Work Crews: Stabilize channel with stone riprap for Included in yearly cost a 300 foot section south of gabion walls for crew and equipment on Sheridan Avenue. Relocate fence and pipe storage yard; flood -proof all sanitary sewer manholes in the flood plain. MICROMMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES I i Clapp , WORK PROJECT DOLLAR AMOUNT Local Tax Money: ­IMICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA i fo" sl 4 Priority 6 - Sheet 4 Washington Street to Clapp Street WORK PROJECT DOLLAR AMOUNT Local Tax Money: Construct new culvert at Iowa Avenue $500,000 and relocate creek from downstream end of Iowa Avenue box culvert. Purchase house on south side of Ralston $ 75,000 (reserve fund) Creek near outlet of Iowa Avenue box culvert. Reconstruct curbs, sidewalks and lawn $ 15,000 area on south side of Johnson Street i; bridge. At Johnson Street purchase older house $ 75,000 (reserve fund) is encroaching on creek. , i Near Clapp Street purchase failing $ 25,000 (reserve fund) k garage structure. Channel excavation from Washington $ 15,000 3 Street to Johnson Street. Purchase floodway easements. $ 25,000 (reserve fund) Remove Johnson Street retaining wall. $ 15,000 Clean brush and place stone riprap at $ 63,000 several locations on this section of the creek. Place new handrails (flood type) at $ 2,000 Evans Street. By City Work Crews: Clean channel downstream of Evans Street Included in yearly cost bridge for 100-200 feet. Remove rubble for crew and equipment and stabilize the stone riprap. Install riprap at outlet of 24 inch storm sewer near Clapp Street. Install stone riprap at Dodge Street abutment. Remove fill on north side of creek near Clapp Street. MICROFILMED By JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES r ;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA 5 Priority 7 - Sheet 3 from Gilbert to Washington WORK PROJECT DOLLAR AMOUNT Local Tax Money: Purchase auto repair shop south of $100,000 (reserve fund) Burlington. By City Work Crews: Open up west span of Burlington Included in yearly cost t Street. for crew and equipment Widen creek channel adjacent to auto repair shop and also north of Burlington Street bridge. r Priority 8 - Sheet 5 - Confluence of Both Channels Upstream to Hickory HYII Park '? Local Tax Funds: y None. By City Work Crews: i; Repair outlets of storm sewers and Included in yearly cost stabilize creekbank with riprap at for crew and equipment outlets on Rochester Avenue. xj Priority 9 - Sheet 9 - Memory Gardens Cemetery to Brookside Drive ;I< Local Tax Mon None. Property owners should purchase Jones property. Yj By City Work Crews: Flood -proof all manholes on sanitary Included in yearly cost sewer; thin brush and small trees for crew and equipment throughout the area; place stone riprap on channel bottom for energy dissipation for 200 feet south of Friendship Street. Priority 10 - Sheet 10 - Brookside Drive to Scott Boulevard " Local Tax Monev- MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES HIKES ;,MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA 1 C None. By City Work Crews: Water -proof all sanitary sewer manholes FUNDING Include in yearly cost for crew and equipment. By priority the funding is as follows: Reserve fund for land acquisition and house purchase - $ 635,000. Priority 1: U.S. Highway 6 to Rock Island Railroad - Small Cities Federal Program Priority 2: Rock Island Railroad to Washington Small Cities Street - Grant Program Priority 3: F Street to Memory Garden Cemetery - $ 491,000 Priority 4: Glendale Court to Sheridan Avenue - $ 275,000 Priority fi Sheridan Avenue to F Street - $ 80,000 Priority 6: Washington Street to Clapp Street - $ 610,000 Priority 7: Gilbert Street to Washington - (Included in reserve fund) Priority 8: Confluence of both channels upstream to Hickory Hill Park - $ 0 t 9: 1 1 Drive - I' 3 Priority 10: Brookside Drive to Scott Boulevard - $ 0 r' is I; z $2,091,000 i ;,MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA 1 C None. By City Work Crews: Water -proof all sanitary sewer manholes FUNDING Include in yearly cost for crew and equipment. By priority the funding is as follows: Reserve fund for land acquisition and house purchase - $ 635,000. Priority 1: U.S. Highway 6 to Rock Island Railroad - Small Cities Federal Program Priority 2: Rock Island Railroad to Washington Small Cities Street - Grant Program Priority 3: F Street to Memory Garden Cemetery - $ 491,000 Priority 4: Glendale Court to Sheridan Avenue - $ 275,000 Priority 5: Sheridan Avenue to F Street - $ 80,000 Priority 6: Washington Street to Clapp Street - $ 610,000 Priority 7: Gilbert Street to Washington - (Included in reserve fund) Priority 8: Confluence of both channels upstream to Hickory Hill Park - $ 0 Priority 9: Memory Gardens Cemetery to Brookside Drive - $ 0 Priority 10: Brookside Drive to Scott Boulevard - $ 0 TOTAL $2,091,000 It is also recommended that the City set up a drainage crew composed of one Maintenance Worker III and three maintenance workers. Equipment would include a hydraulic excavator and truck, small tools and supplies. The cost estimate is as follows: 3 maintenance men - $ 31,500 per year Supervisor - $ 13,500 per year MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS.OES I10INES ;,,MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA 1 ,i 110°) 7 Hydraulic Excavator - $ 35,000 per year (this includes depreciation and operation costs. Capital funds for purchase would be approximately $100,000 initially) Truck, small tools and supplies - $ 20,000 per year Total annual cost: $100,000 per year Funding by fiscal year would be as follows: FY81 FY82 FY83 To be discussed by committee. FY84 FY85 bdw FIICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES 5: I 1 `F - }:i III li t� F� 0 tl i I I ' 1 1 I i j i I 1' I ;,,MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA 1 ,i 110°) 7 Hydraulic Excavator - $ 35,000 per year (this includes depreciation and operation costs. Capital funds for purchase would be approximately $100,000 initially) Truck, small tools and supplies - $ 20,000 per year Total annual cost: $100,000 per year Funding by fiscal year would be as follows: FY81 FY82 FY83 To be discussed by committee. FY84 FY85 bdw FIICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES i 114 � I I � i { i r i I I j i' I i j r i i I 1- I _ MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA � CJ ✓ �`(�-Cid �,ei N U MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES I40INES r ;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA I MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES City of Iowa Cit MEMORANDUM DATE: une 26, 1979 TO: Neal Berlin and City Council FROM: Dick Plastino, Director of Public Works RE: Bricks at the Service Building is The City has received applications for 33,000 bricks. There are approximately 60,000 left and additional bricks will be coming in from sewer. the river corridor .` It is absolutely imperative that we get the service building yard cleaned up so we can complete our construction projects and otherwise get the entire area dressed up. It is a horrible eye sore at the r present time. Public Works.is going to lower the price to 15¢ per brick to see if we can get these things moved off of our property. The people who have already applied for bricks will also get them at 15¢. This price is a little below ? the market price but we must keep in mind that our primary objective is to get these bricks off of City property, spread them around the community to citizens of Iowa City, and obtain some revenue. k4, ^� 1 L+ 1 NI I cc: Rosemary Vitosh Gene Dietz Craig Minter Bud Stockman r rr u Si r! C MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES ;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA 1 i City of Iowa Ci, MEMORANDUM Date: June 26, 1979 To: Neal Berlin andNity Council From: Dick Plastino Re: Ralston Creek P o ty The City may have an opportunity to purchase the channel of Ralston Creek for a few hundred feet from the intersection of Court and Muscatine north towards College. The property taxes on this land have not been paid and it will be available in approximately 6-9 months after the County goes through legal proceedings. It should be the objective of the City to obtain as much of this property as possible. Public Works would like permission from the City Council to express an interest in this property to the County so that they will reserve it for us if the property taxes are not paid. Council could give direction to the City Manager at an informal meeting during the next few weeks. bj2/22 3H MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES IIDIIIES 132 -h1ICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB • CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA City of Iowa Cit MEMORANDUM Date: June 28, 1979 To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Dick Plastino, Director of Public Works Re: Plastic Turning Arrows - Council Referr Attached please find a list which details the intellsection at which Traffic Engineering has placed left turning arrows. You will note that the first portion of the list details those with plastic turning arrows; the second portion of the list details those with painted left turning arrows. The application of cold plastics to pavement requires certain existing street surface characteristics. Manufacturers of cold plastics with epoxy bonds recommend that plastic pavement pavement markings used only on new asphalt or new Portland concrete surfaces with a rough texture. (Some suppliers recommend against using cold plastics on any PCC surfaces). The reason surface characteristics are so critical. is that the cold plastics are actually •glued to the surface of the roadway with epoxies. In warm weather, particularly the months of July and August, asphalt pavement surfaces will tend to flow. 'This allows the cold plastic pavement markings to be imbedded into the surface of the asphaltic street. This provides a superior bond between the roadway surface and the plastic arrow. Obviously, PCC surfaces do not 'flow and therefore this imbedding effect cannot be achieved. On older asphaltic surfaces -where much of the asphaltic binder has disappeared through wear and only polished aggregate remains, it is extremely difficult to achieve a good bond in between plastic pavement markings and roadway surfaces. Therefore, in areas with older asphaltic surfaces, plastic pavement markings are not recommended. In the summer of 1978, the Traffic Engineering Division did purchase ten sets of arrows and these were applied at areas either ideally suited for plastic pavement markings or areas which were noted for testing. The intersection of First Avenue and Muscatine Avenue was selected as a test area because the pavement there was new and had a rougher texture. In the 12 months since that installation, the plastic arrows have proved to wear extremely well. The intersection of Burlington Street and Clinton Street was also selected as a test site for application to PCC surfaces. The surface at this intersection was approximately five years old. If in the next four months the arrows continue to perform well in this area, monies will be budgeted in the forthcoming budget process to purchase more of these plastic pavement markings. Should you have additional questions or commants regarding the use of plastic pavement markings, please don't hesitate to contact myself of Jim Brachtel, Traffic Engineer. bdw4/14-15 MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES moltIES 38y f•: r -;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB 1 - ----ML _ • CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA LEFT TURN ARROW LOCATIONS EXISTING PLASTIC ARROW MARKINGS: Melrose Avenue and Woolf Avenue Iowa Avenue and Madison Street Burlington Street and Clinton Street Gilbert Street and Burlington Street Park Road and North Dubuque Street Bowery Street and North Dodge Street Bowery Street and North Governor Street Kirkwood Avenue and Dodge Street Kirkwood Avenue and Keokuk Street EXISTING PAINTED ARROW LOCATIONS: Market Street and Gilbert Street Madison Avenue and Burlington Street Capitol Street and Burlington Street Dubuque Street and Burlington Street Linn Street and Burlington Street Grand Avenue and Riverside Drive Benton Street and Riverside Drive Capitol Street and Benton Street Gilbert Street and Highway 6 Bypass Keokuk Street and Highway 6 Bypass Sycamore Street and Highway 6 Bypass Gilbert Street and Prentiss Street MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES IIOINES I 4 ;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA 2 First Avenue and Lower Muscatine Lower Muscatine and Mall Drive Court Street and Muscatine Various locations in the left turning lane of Muscatine Avenue east of First Avenue Various locations. in the left turning lane of Burlington Street between Madison and Gilbert Street. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOINES ;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES. IOWA I `City of Iowa Cite MEMORAIINIDIJM Date: June 29, 1979 To: Neal Berlin and ity Council From: Dick Plastino Re: Newsprint Picku ouncil Referral Public Works has been keeping accurate records during the months of May and June. During the month of May paper pickup averaged 2.65 tons per day. The month of June appears to be somewhat lower. The graphs for the two months are attached. The cost figures are as follows: EXPENSE Truck costs Replacement Fund - $ P77 1,113 miles at 671 per mile (Operating Fund) - $ 746 3 Subtotal: $1,023 per month Personnel expenses -- Maintenance Worker II with .fringe benefits - $1,174 f Temporary help - $ 500 Subtotal:. $1,674 per month Grand total; $2,697 REVENUE 50 tons per month x $10.00 = $ 500 $5.10 landfill fee not paid x 50 ton = $ 255 Total 755 Public Works recommends that this program continue for the following reasons: 1. The program is both a pickup program and an educational tool. It is making people familiar with the concept of reusing discarded material and it provides people the means to easily recycle ma- terial. X385 MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOVIES i 1 i Y, I ^' � ' 3 If � I' i i I I I I i i i -MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA 2 2. While the program is currently losing money due to low market price j of newspaper, it is entirely possible the program could break even or actually make money with a slight shift in. market conditions. 3. Participation in a newsprint program always increases as the length of the program increases. The program has had a spotty history of stability and we should continue the program at least a year or two before evaluating it. An existing truck will continue to be used for pickup. We will not purchase a new truck at this time. In summary, Public Works would recommend that we continue with the program at least until the end of FY80. jm4/5 MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES r MKROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA Daily Paper Collection for the Month of AAX 1-979 1 I 1 I` i I I m c ' F� C ,P L l o- ,I> . I f �I 1 r MKROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA Daily Paper Collection for the Month of AAX 1-979 I. I I I 1 1 1 I I I i 1 i Daus of the Vtr ck MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 110Ir1ES Ivg.Tonnage per Day i.er Tons 1vg. Tonnage per Week _ual�Tans m I o- 1 9- ff 8- T- ------- -------- G ------------ T 5- — 4 -- �+ ]•Ili a+ s'` Z- w ndz •� Y �A I.YL I I. I I I 1 1 1 I I I i 1 i Daus of the Vtr ck MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 110Ir1ES Ivg.Tonnage per Day i.er Tons 1vg. Tonnage per Week _ual�Tans m i `MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA Daily Paper Collection for the Month of �YAo✓ ZL ` zi jji I I I 1 I 11 "gI M T W N F S ., M T W W F S S M T vl W G S S IA T w W r S c M T W W F Days of the Weck MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOIRES Avg. Tonnage per Day Tor Avg.Tonnage per Week Ton! '-MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB l • CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA City of Iowa CHC MEMORANDUM Date: June 28, 1979 To: Neal Berlin andAa Council From: Dick Plastino Re: Rear Loading GaTrucks vs. Side Loading Garbage Trucks A couple of years ago, Public Works recommended' that we replace our garbage fleet with side loading garbage trucks. At that time the economics favored this option. We have recently done another analysis comparing the two methods and have concluded that the cheapest method of picking up garbage is to continue with our current system of rear loaders utilizing two men to a truck. Accordingly, as we replace our fleet in the years ahead, we will replace the trucks with 25 cubic yard tandem axle rear loading garbage trucks. In brief what has happened is that the escalating cost of side loading equipment has outweighed the decrease in manpower needed on a one-man truck. Our solid waste crews currently are able to pick up approximately 15 tons of solid waste per day per two-man truck. This is an extremely high productivity rate. Other municipalities frequently have productivity rates of from 6 to 10 tons per day per three-man truck. This high productivity rate combined with the escalating price of one-man side loader equipment has tilted the odds back in favor the two-man rear loading truck. A summary of the cost comparison is indicated below. Current Method Side Loaders 6 rear loaders, 4 routes year-round 7 trucks, 5 routes winter, 6 routes summer Annual Cost Annual Cost $204,276 $221,244 As we replace our rear loader fleet over the next several years, we will be pushing toward a five truck fleet rather than a six truck fleet. However, the number of routes will stay the same, that is, four. Under this option, the annual cost would be $188,532. In summary, although I strongly advocated one-man side loaders in the past, the high productivity of our current work force and the economics of equipment prices indicate that my prior decision is no longer correct. Accordingly, we will continue with our present system of two-man rear loading trucks. bdw4/1-2 cc: Craig Minter Dave Daley WA IIICROFILNED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES IIOINES I ;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB 1 CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA 'City of Iowa Ci'__ MEMORANDUM DATE: June 28, 1979 TO: City Council i Dennis Kraft, Director of Planning g Program DevelopmentFROM: Dick Plastino, Director of Public Works / RE: Alleys Located East of Gilbert Street and North of Friends'/ Part of the City Council's informal discussion of Block Grant Program funded Neighborhood Site Improvements focused upon the possible paving of alleys which were located one-half block east of Gilbert Street north of Bowery, and the alley which is located one-half block north of Friendship Street and extending eastward from Garden. In both instances there was a request made to pave these alleys. Subsequently, the Directors of Planning and Program Development and Public Works evaluated these sites in an attempt to determine the impact of benefit Of paving these alleys. In both instances it was determined that relatively few residential structures would actually benefit from these paving projects. In the case of the alley east of Gilbert Street, it appeared as though conceivably four to five residential units use this alley as their sole means of access. The apartments along Van Buren Street have access from Van Buren as well as the alley and some of the commercial structures along Gilbert Street have access from Gilbert as well as the alley. It was the Director of Public Works opinion that if the businesses along Gilbert want the alley paved perhaps an assessment project could be carried out for this purpose. The evaluation of the alley north of Friendship indicated that there are probably six to eight dwelling units which access off of this alley and that the Odd Fellows Lodge accesses both off the alley and off of the street. In both instances it is recommended that the City -not use Block Grant funds for the paving of these alleys. The level of public benefit does not begin to approach that which is perceived by residents'of the City in the paving of the alleys adjacent to St. Wenceslaus and Zion Lutheran Churches. DK/DP/ssw MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES 1387 � r 1 Ft fy I !i 1 r f } fi j I ;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB 1 CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA 'City of Iowa Ci'__ MEMORANDUM DATE: June 28, 1979 TO: City Council i Dennis Kraft, Director of Planning g Program DevelopmentFROM: Dick Plastino, Director of Public Works / RE: Alleys Located East of Gilbert Street and North of Friends'/ Part of the City Council's informal discussion of Block Grant Program funded Neighborhood Site Improvements focused upon the possible paving of alleys which were located one-half block east of Gilbert Street north of Bowery, and the alley which is located one-half block north of Friendship Street and extending eastward from Garden. In both instances there was a request made to pave these alleys. Subsequently, the Directors of Planning and Program Development and Public Works evaluated these sites in an attempt to determine the impact of benefit Of paving these alleys. In both instances it was determined that relatively few residential structures would actually benefit from these paving projects. In the case of the alley east of Gilbert Street, it appeared as though conceivably four to five residential units use this alley as their sole means of access. The apartments along Van Buren Street have access from Van Buren as well as the alley and some of the commercial structures along Gilbert Street have access from Gilbert as well as the alley. It was the Director of Public Works opinion that if the businesses along Gilbert want the alley paved perhaps an assessment project could be carried out for this purpose. The evaluation of the alley north of Friendship indicated that there are probably six to eight dwelling units which access off of this alley and that the Odd Fellows Lodge accesses both off the alley and off of the street. In both instances it is recommended that the City -not use Block Grant funds for the paving of these alleys. The level of public benefit does not begin to approach that which is perceived by residents'of the City in the paving of the alleys adjacent to St. Wenceslaus and Zion Lutheran Churches. DK/DP/ssw MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES 1387 x r i ;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB • CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA City of Iowa CH'; MEMORAIR IDDM DATE: June 29, 1979 TO: City Council FROM: Paul Glaves, Development Coordinator q)P1 RE: Block 64 Hotel Development BACKGROUND: As explained to the City Council in the memo from the City Manager dated June 15, the designated developers of the hotel requested the City to issue revenue bonds for the purpose of financing the hotel development. In response to this request, the staff evaluated the situation and by letter responded that such a bond issue would pose serious legal problems unless the parcel were re -bid. The letter stated the City's preference that the developer proceed under the terms of the original offer and established two deadlines relative thereto: July 10 for submission of financial and ownership information, and subject to Council approval of this information; August 1 for full contract language filed with the City Clerk. While the City has not yet received a written reply to this letter, the City Manager has been informed verbally that the developer does not wish to proceed under the terms of the original offer. In response to this information, the staff has proceeded to prepare for a new solicitation of offers to purchase the hotel site. ISSUES: Several key issues have been identified which will need to be resolved prior to the solicitation of offers. These issues are discussed below: Revenue Bonds: The staff has discussed the advisability of using industrial revenue bonds for hotel development with Don Zuchelli, our Urban Renewal Marketing Consultant; Paul Speer, our Municipal Finance Consultant; and with Ken Haynie, our bond counsel. Mr. Haynie confirmed that the recent amendments to Chapter 419, the Code of Iowa, do allow this type of bond issue. Mr. Speer advised that in his judgment it would be advantageous to the City to use the industrial revenue bond financing mechanism, provided the City took care in formulating the program. He provided the City a sample ordinance which would allow the City to fully recover its costs in connection with such a bond issue. Mr. Zuchelli advised that using a revenue bond issue would greatly enhance the City's chances of securing a quality hotel development. Feasibility is substantially improved due to the reduced interest cost. Zuchelli is currently working on eleven hotel developments. In every case there is some form of direct public support, including Federal Urban Development Action Grants, revenue bonds, general obligation bonds, free parking in City ramps, etc. Given the 'range of possible City actions 'to encourage hotel development; the use of industrial revenue bonds appears to be the most advantageous. The City's costs can be fully recovered. The real benefit comes from a Federal tax exemption rather than any City expenditure. The staff recommends that - _, MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES NOIRES 13 ?8 U i I _MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA City Council June 29, 1979 Page 2 the parcel be rebid, offering to use revenue bonds as a financing mechanism. Parking Charges: Intheprevious solicitation of offers, the City left the question of parking charges for hotel patrons open to negotiation. We would like to limit the range of negotiation over this matter. Previously, the hotel developers contended, and the staff agreed, that the economics of this development was fragile due to low room rates at competing establishments. The projected cash flow was sensitive to parking costs. However, if the City does undertake a revenue bond issue, the annual debt service require- ments are reduced by approximately $100,000 per year. Added savings occur because a 1`a financing fee on the construction loan can be avoided by using bond sale proceeds for both construction and permanent financing. While the City would charge a fee, and the underwriters and attorneys would charge fees, a savings from conventional financing fees would still be realized. Accordingly, the staff recommends that the Prospectus and contract specify that parking will be provided to hotel patrons at the prevailing rates. The control mechanism and method of reimbursement would remain open to negotiation. Methods of Solicitation and Length of Bidding Period: The staff has considered the concerns regarding the adequacy of a 30 -day bidding period. Whether or not 30 days is sufficient depends on the manner in which the solicitation is handled. We would, of course, use the required legal notice. If the notice is supplemented with selected newspaper advertising; the packet materials are distributed free so time isn't wasted collecting five dollars; and if Don Zuchelli is retained to assist with the marketing by direct contact in the industry, a 30 -day period would be adequate. The timing is important because an early spring construction start is highly desirable, both from the City's and a developer's standpoint. The time between developer selection and spring is already tight and developer selection needs to occur as soon as possible. The staff recommends that Zuchelli be retained Ito assist the City with the marketing; that the $5 fee for packets used last time be eliminated, and that a 30 -day bidding period be used. Development Requirements: The development requirements in the previous solicitation were: 80 rooms minimum, 150 rooms considered optimal Restaurant required Must be integrated with the parking structure Must be a minimum of 2 stories The staff recommends that the minimum size be changed to 125 rooms, and that at least 3 stories be required. MICROFILRED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES n01nEs i r ;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA I City Council June 29, 1979 Page 3 I am prepared to discuss these matters with the Council at the July 2 informal session and will be seeking Council authorization to proceed with the solicitation. d ;j 1 i 1 1 1 i r I i i I i I i I PG/ssw f I MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES I :MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA y I 1'�)City of Iowa CIC' MEMORANDUM DATE: June 29, 1979 TO: City Council FROM: Dennis R. Kraft, Director of Planning B Program Development 1p RE: Boat Ramp Sites Attached is a copy of the Evaluation of Alternate Sites for Boat Ramps that was distributed to the Riverfront Commission earlier this week. DRK/ssw Attachment MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES 1389 1 is I r�. i; ' t E` "i 1 s< 1 I ) 1 �F ±I I 1— a 1 I 1'�)City of Iowa CIC' MEMORANDUM DATE: June 29, 1979 TO: City Council FROM: Dennis R. Kraft, Director of Planning B Program Development 1p RE: Boat Ramp Sites Attached is a copy of the Evaluation of Alternate Sites for Boat Ramps that was distributed to the Riverfront Commission earlier this week. DRK/ssw Attachment MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES 1389 1 ;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB • CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVE SITES FOR BOAT RAMP I. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND In May of 1979, the Iowa City City Council approved a proposal by the Riverfront Commission to construct a boat ramp with parking facilities on the west bank of the Iowa River between Benton Street and the Highway 6 By-pass. The ramp was intended to provide a safe and convenient launching point for those persons desiring to take advantage of the excellent fishing below the Burlington Street dam and, secondarily, to provide river access for rescue operations. The parking area was to serve both on and off -shore fisherman. Southgate Development Company promised to dedicate a 45-50 foot easement next to the river just south of Wendy's on Riverside Drive. (see enclosed map) Largely because of its proximity to the Burlington Street dam area, this site was believed to be an iridal location for the boat ramp and parking area. Stanley Consultants of Muscatine was hired in late May to design the ramp and parking area. In mid-June the consultants reported that the Sturgis Corner site is physically incapable of accommodating more than five car/trailer parking spaces. It was agreed that five spaces would provide an insufficient amount of parking for river users resulting in under -utilization of the ramp and/or problems arising from overflow parking on adjacent private property or the road. According to the Iowa State Conservation Commission 20 spaces is the minimally acceptable amount of parking for a facility of this type. In addition to the parking deficiency, the project would result in the loss of all vegetation in the vicinity, including several large silverleaf maples, and the project cost would run nearly $10,000 over budget. While it seems inappropriate to proceed with the project at this site under these conditions, one alternative consists of purchasing additional land for parking from Southgate Development Company. Another alternative involves constructing the ramp at an alternate location such as the pollution control plant, Sturgis Ferry Park or Napoleon Park. All of these sites are on land which is apparently owned by the City and are evaluated below. II. ALTERNATIVE SITES 1. Water Pollution Control Facility: The water pollution control facility (sewage treatment plant) lies to the south of the intersection of Kirkwood Avenue with the termination of S. Clinton Street. A road runs from the plant entrance to a point near the riverbank roughly next to the outflow point. The general topography makes this area suitable for a boat ramp. The bank at this point has been heavily riprapped to prevent further bank erosion. A fence separates MICROFILMED DY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOIIIES 4 ,;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB • CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA F the riverbank from the treatment plant grounds and runs along the entire length, from the northern boundary to Highway 6. The entrance to the treatment plant grounds is normally locked during non -working hours, although there is at least one employee working at the plant around the clock. There are a number of unfenced holding ponds on this site. The water pollution control facilities will be relocated at a downstream site in about five years, but plans for the future use of the present site are uncertain at this time. 2. Sturgis Ferry Park: Sturgis Ferry Park lies to the south of Highway 6 By-pass between Highway 218 and the west bank of the Iowa River and directly south of the City maintenance garage. This land was used as a sanitary landfill until 15 years ago; the surface is now smooth and grassy. The distance between the landf111 boundary and the river edge varies from a few feet at the southern end up to 100 feet at the northern end. Two possible locations for a boat ramp exist along this stretch of riverbank, a "north" site and a "south" site. The north site is situated approximately midway between the northern and southern park boundaries, while the south site lies along the more narrow southern strip of park property. There is no access road to either site. 3. Napoleon Park: Napoleon Park is located between Sand Road and the east bank of the Iowa River approximately three-quarters of a mile south of the Highway 6 By-pass. It is a recently acquired City park in the process of development. A potential ramp site lies at its north end. III. EVALUATION OF THE WATER POLLUTION CONTROL FACILITY SITE Although it is the most desirable site in terms of proximity to the Burlington Street dam fishing area, the pollution control facility does not appear to be a promising location for a boat ramp for the following reasons: A. Parking: Adequate space exists on the treatment plant grounds to accommodate 20 cars with trailers, however, this area functioned in the past as a series of sludge drying tanks surrounded and partitioned by concrete curbing. It would be necessary to remove this curbing or place 1 to 1; feet of fill in these tanks before converting the area into a parking facility. The surface is presently gravel, overlaying sand and MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES 401NES -,MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA 9 3 MICROFILMED BY j JORM MICROLAB 1 CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES clay tile. The area now serves as a storage facility for manhole covers, culverts and related materials. B. Riprapping: There has been severe riverbank erosion in the vicinity of the treatment plant arising largely from the manner in which the Coraville dam has been operated. Efforts have recently been made to arrest the erosion process through the placement of large quantities of riprap along the riverbank. The potential ramp site is among the areas covered by riprap, and ramp construction would necessitate the riprap removal. The expense of doing this has not been estimated but may be significant. C. Proximity to Outflow Point: An outflow point through which treated water is discharged into the Iowa River is situated directly south of the potential ramp site. As the ramp should be angled downstream (in order to reduce silting and erosion problems) river users would be directly exposed to this discharge and eddy current problems may arise. When treatment plant facilities are moved to the l new site in five.years this problem will no longer exist. r D. City Liability/Plant Security: Potential hazards exist on the treatment plant grounds for river users including unfenced lagoons and overhead power lines. Since the treatment is located plant on public property, the City would be liable for any accidents or health hazards to which the public was exposed. The possibility does exist for fencing off the ? access road, thereby eliminating most of the risk. However, this would result in considerable expense and Pollution Control Superintendent Harry Boren indicated that it might interfere with employee movement around the plant grounds. E. Aesthetics: As long as operations continue at the treatment plant the odor, lack _ of vegetation, and general appearance make it an unattractive Y public use area. 4 IV. COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF STURGIS FERRY PARK AND NAPOLEON PARK SITES Ar Distance from Burlington Street Dam: Because the boat ramp is intended primarily to serve the Burlington Street dam area, proximity to this area is an important consideration. Associated with the I i i proximity are time and fuel savings in terms of both river and roadway travel. MICROFILMED BY j JORM MICROLAB 1 CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES ;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB • CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA 1 4 1. Sturgis Ferry Park The ramp at Sturgis Ferry Park would be located approximately one mile downstream from the Burlington Street dam area, a rather insignificant distance beyond the sewage treatment plant in terms of river travel. However, for most Iowa City residents, driving to and from the ramp site would involve negotiating the intersection of Highways 6, 218, and 1, one of the busiest and most congested intersections in Iowa City. Roadway time and fuel costs would be noticeably higher for any site located south of this intersection. 2. Napoleon Park The Napoleon Park ramp site is three-quarters of a mile further downstream from Sturgis Ferry, or a total of one and three-quarters miles from the Burlington Street clam. Like Sturgis Ferry Park, Napoleon Park is located south of a busy and congested intersection, in this case Highway 6 and Gilbert Street. This intersection is slated for improvement in 1979-80. Time and fuel cost would be the highest for this alternative, though the roadway travel difference between this and Sturgis Ferry Park becomes less significant when intersection delays are considered. B. Current and Future Land Use: 1. Sturgis Ferry Park Sturgis Ferry Park is a large area, only a small part of which would be consumed by the boat ramp and parking facility. The park has a grass surface and some young trees have been planted there by Project GREEN. No further improvements have been added and the park is little used by the public. The City maintenance garage lies at the northern end of Sturgis Ferry Park, and a dead-end road separates the narrow southern boundary of the park from highway commercial uses. The Iowa City Municipal Airport is located west across Highway 218 as are some commercial uses. Future plans are to retain this area as a park/open space. Phase 3 of the Iowa River Corridor Study proposes that Sturgis Ferry Park be developed as passive open space with strong emphasis on visual appeal. Passive activities are recommended for this park because of the surface instability arising from its past use as a landfill. Attention should be given to ensure the compability of a boat ramp with a park of this nature. In addition, this site would provide a very visible access to the Iowa River. This visibility is lacking at the other sites. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOINES A ,MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB I 2. Napoleon Park • CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA 5 Because of its physical characteristics, Napoleon Park is rather isolated from surrounding land uses. The potential ramp site lies at the far north end of Napoleon Park, immediately beyond a curve in Sand Road and separated from vacant land to the north by the CRANDIC Railroad tracks. The park extends approximately one-half mile south of the ramp site and is being gradually cleared. A baseball diamond exists in the southern end of the park. Land to the east of Napoleon Park is agricultural or vacant and is separated from the park by a steep embankment on the east side of Sand Road. Land across from the potential ramp site on the west bank of the Iowa River is also used for agricultural purposes. Future plans are to retain public ownership of this land. Phase 3 of the Iowa River Corridor Study recommends' the establishment 6-f—a major south end community park including sports fields, day camp activities, swimming beaches, and boating opportunities. The Plan proposes the construction of a boat ramp at precisely this location. C. Soil Suitability: 1. Sturgis Ferry Park Sturgis Ferry Park is located in the Iowa River floodplain with its development potential further limited by having l' formerly functioned as a landfill. Refuse is commonly 12 to 18 feet thick and is immediately underlain by medium -to -coarse sand. The exact boundary between the landfill and stable riverbank soils is presently unknown, and soil sampling will be necessary to determine whether a ramp can be satisfactorily constructed in this area. Preliminary investigation by Stanley Consultants indicate that a ramp is feasible. 2. Napoleon Park f _ The ramp site at Napoleon Park is within the flood plain. Soils in this • area are suitable for boat ramp construction. As is the case at all potential ramp sites, riprap placed around the ramp should prevent any bank erosion. D. Parking Area: i MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB 1 CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES I d -MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB i • CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA 6 MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES I. Sturgis Ferry Park Plenty of space is available for parking at Sturgis Ferry Park. However, because the land is still settling over the refuse, the parking lot would have to be gravelled and not asphalted. In that the park includes a wide expanse of open space, some amount of visual screening around the parking area would be desirable. 2. Napoleon Park The necessary 10,000 square feet of land for parking is likewise available at Napoleon Park. Grading and surfacing would be required. The parking area would also serve other park users. E. Vegetation Removal: �1 ?' 1. Sturgis Ferry Park Only weeds inhabit the riverbank near the ramp site at Sturgis Ferry Park. There are intermittant clusters of =' trees along the length of the river but there are none in the immediate vicinity of either ramp site. The parking area would be situated on top of the landfill, therefore only grass would be disturbed in building the parking lot. 2. Napoleon Park Land immediately adjacent to the river is heavily wooded ±i along this length of riverbank. However, the proposed ramp site itself appears to have already been cleared. One ?' big locust tree, largely dead, obstructs the area along which the ramp would probably be built. This tree may have to be removed for the ramp to be built at this site. The proposed parking area is grassy with no trees. F. Local Accessibility: 1. Sturgis Ferry Park There is presently no access from Highway 218 to the river at Sturgis Ferry Park. An access road would have to be built and permission obtained from the Iowa State Department of Transportation to access the park from Highway 218. A curb cut presently exists along Highway 218 near the southern ramp site. Assuming this cut is used as an access point for the south site, the road would extend about 200 feet. The north site is approximately 350 feet away from Highway 218 assuming a straight line distance. If access is restricted to the existing curb cut off of Highway 218 the road would be longer than 350 feet. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES 0 9 ;•MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB N CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES 1101IIES 2. Napoleon Park A gravel road begins at the entrance to Napoleon Park and continues to within several hundred feet of the river. An estimated 150 feet of additional gravel would be required to complete this road and improvements made to the existing gravelled area. G. Ownership: All properties appear to be owned by the City, although there is some question concerning the nature of the interest held by the Airport Commission in Sturgis Ferry Park. H. Topography: 1. Sturgis Ferry Park (a) North Site *; The landfill surface at Sturgis Ferry Park is quite flat and at this site begins sloping towards the river approximately 30 feet from the water's edge. The vertical distance from the top of this ridge to r; the water's edge is roughly 12 feet. As a 12 to 15 percent slope is desirable for a boat ramp, some excavation would be required here. The flat landfill surface, extending nearly 400 feet from the landfill margin to Highway 218, is ideal for parking. (b) Site .South The riverbank at this site is much steeper than is the Vbank V at the north site. The same 12 foot drop occurs over a distance of only 5, rather than 30 feet. A greater amount of excavation would therefore be necessary. The distance from the river to Highway 218 is only 200 feet at this point but still provides ample space for parking. 2. Napoleon Park a - The topography at Napoleon Park makes this site well suited for the construction of a boat ramp and parking facilities. The land surface slopes gently and continuously towards the river so that no extra drainage and only a minimal amount of grading would be required. Although the natural slope is only about 6 percent, a 13% ramp grade can be achieved by cutting into the riverbank for a short distance. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES 1101IIES _MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA 01d V. SUMMARY Although it is closest to the Burlington Street dam the Pollution Control Plant appears to be the least satisfactory site for a boat ramp. Both sites at Sturgis Ferry Park and the Napoleon Park site appear to be suitable for a boat ramp with Sturgis Ferry Park having the advantage of greater proximity to the Burlington Street dam and good visibility. The Napoleon Park site is a more attractive natural site and .is compatible with other proposed park activities. Adequate parking area is available at all the sites. Cost estimates for all three sites are very similar, with gravelled access roads and parking lots. At Napoleon Park, asphalting the road and parking area increases the cost considerably. Parks and Recreation might be willing to share in this extra cost. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES 1101NES r ,MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB i *Source: Stanley Consultants, h ! Cost fugures assume a CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA SITE 1. Sturgis Ferry, South Site 2. Sturgis Ferry, North Site Direct access Access at existing curb cut 3. Napoleon Park Gravel drive and parking Bituminous asphalt drive and parking 4. Pollution Control Facility Gravel drive and parking Bituminous asphalt drive and parking i *Source: Stanley Consultants, h ! Cost fugures assume a CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA ,.-J4ICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA i LOCATIONS OF POS I S I BLE BOAT RAMP S i TES MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOINES i I S I BLE BOAT RAMP S i TES MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOINES i I I I i L" I 1 'I i 1 i i' I- i a li 3 t '{ s 4 h � --MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB _1 • CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA CITY OF IOWA CITY CIVIC CENFER 410 E. WASHINGTON ST IOWA CITY IOWA 52240 (319) 354.180D June 25, 1979 The Honorable Robert A. Vevera, Mayor City of Iowa City, Iowa Civic Center 410 E. Washington Street Iowa City, Iowa 52240 Dear Mayor Vevera: Please accept my resignation as assistant city attorney effective Wednes- day, August 1, 1979, at 5:00 P.M. In early August we will be moving to St. Louis where I will be a student at a theological seminary. I would like to thank the city council, city manager Neal Berlin, city clerk Abbie Stolfus, and the whole staff for the support I have re- ceived. Especially, I want to thank John Hayek, Angela Ryan, Leila Waller, and former assistant city attorney Anatolij Kushnir for their i counsel, encouragement, and friendship. Our City has seen much betterment in the past five years, and I am pleased to have played a small part in that process. Very truly yours, Robert H. Bowlin Assistant City Attorney cc: Neal Berlin Abbie Stolfus John Hayek Angela Ryan Leila Waller Anatolij Kushnir jml/4 MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOINES O 90 i 1 i i' i � I j a --MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB _1 • CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA CITY OF IOWA CITY CIVIC CENFER 410 E. WASHINGTON ST IOWA CITY IOWA 52240 (319) 354.180D June 25, 1979 The Honorable Robert A. Vevera, Mayor City of Iowa City, Iowa Civic Center 410 E. Washington Street Iowa City, Iowa 52240 Dear Mayor Vevera: Please accept my resignation as assistant city attorney effective Wednes- day, August 1, 1979, at 5:00 P.M. In early August we will be moving to St. Louis where I will be a student at a theological seminary. I would like to thank the city council, city manager Neal Berlin, city clerk Abbie Stolfus, and the whole staff for the support I have re- ceived. Especially, I want to thank John Hayek, Angela Ryan, Leila Waller, and former assistant city attorney Anatolij Kushnir for their i counsel, encouragement, and friendship. Our City has seen much betterment in the past five years, and I am pleased to have played a small part in that process. Very truly yours, Robert H. Bowlin Assistant City Attorney cc: Neal Berlin Abbie Stolfus John Hayek Angela Ryan Leila Waller Anatolij Kushnir jml/4 MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOINES O 90 ;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB • CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA REC"VED JUN 2 8 1979 • 9 Lea ue of Iowa Municipalities Suite 100 900 • Des Maines Street. Out Moines, Iowa 50316 • 515/265.9961 June 27, 1979 PRESIDENT Kmn.'It E. Kew Mayor Mown City VICE PRESIDENT TO: Selected Municipal Officials Dorothy Van Horn c°"""In°'""" '""r"O^ FROM: Robert W. Harpster, ,Executive Director PAST NIE90ENr Hu L, mons. SUBJECT: National League of Cities Annual Convention At e..n , Yu Lvn Mm.bii.... lr - - - - - - - - - DIRECRIRS I - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I "-,ban S. Conlon For, F°,t ooeY, Rabat, S. Natal, The annual convention of the National League of Cities will be held November i mber 24-28, 1979 in Las Vegas. j Fon Afodison Marilyn McCrary Enclosed is a complete mplete brochure including registration, hotel L.I,n City reservation form and program outline. j Paul Niel Coy Cyk rmiran,, RlthntlE.Dlwn Because this year's convention coincides with the Thanksgiving + h..rpnr j week- end, reservations should be made as early as possible. Early regis- tration lu,ZIuun D-11-1Ranti.k will entitle you to reduced rates until September 1st. 5;;; f'", Additionally, the League has arranged for a block of rooms for Iowa I I.oP.R°on officials at the Sahara Hotel. These rooms are on a first-come, first - serve basis and : I WOO". LI.yd S .... ,, will only be available until September 1st. All un- filled rooms will be released on that Aennn, date. If you plan on attending you should indicate that you want "IOWA j Richard D. Snynon a room in the BLOCK" when completing the hotel reservation form. M.Iyur Cir n4th E. Ka At..E Smith One final note. Because the convention falls on the busiest holiday weekend in rh°""citu. Las Vegas, no one will be allowed to check in to a hotel room on Saturday, the 24th. Plan Tully ''' i I cuurrcdm,n to arrive in Las Vegas either on Friday, the 23rd, or Sunday the 25th to 9 Dubv°are avoid this problem. As soon as you receive a confirmation of a hotel 1 Ex ECYTI VE DIRECTOR I room, you must send one night's deposit to guarantee your room. ! flobnt W. Nutl,t" Last year over fifty Iowans represented our state at this convention. I hope your schedule is allows you to attend this year. RWH/mc j I enc. I j i I • 139► i IIICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES IIOIOES MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES flo IBES I ,-,MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA MINUTES OF STAFF MEETING June 13, 1979 Departmental referrals from the informal and formal Council meetings of June 11 and 12 were distributed to the staff (copy attached). Items to be included on the agenda for next week are: Railroad crossing agreement with Crandic First reading of garbage ordinance Public hearing for plans for Streetscape Project, Phase II A Motion to approve revised fiscal policy Public hearing to amend sign ordinance Public hearing on the suspension of First Avenue Kerr-McGee liquor license ( Third reading of ordinance regarding dancing regulations } The City Manager had requested department heads to submit.ideas to be presented to Mr. Ken Ruberg of Congressman Leach's office who will meet with the staff on June 20 at 10:00 A.M. The following items were mentioned: LEAA - Highway Safety i ASAP Program i EPA Urban Incentive Program Delays in getting UMiA grants y 13 C Agreement National Park Legislation Availability of intergovernmental training funds The Assistant City Manager advised that the Press -Citizen is publishing the annual government issue. The staff was asked to review for possible changes the material pertaining to their departments before noon tomorrow. ii The Assistant City Manager also advised that by Friday the policy determination items L for the League of Iowa Municipalities must be in the mail. The Human Relations Director spoke briefly concerning the new job evaluation plan. A copy of this document is to be furnished to each department head this afternoon. A pay plan will be included as well as new evaluation forms. A meeting was scheduled for 10:30 A.M. Friday for all department heads to discuss the plan. The department heads were asked to meet with the Human Relations Director individually as well. The meeting on Friday will deal primarily i 134 MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES flo IBES i i i i i i F i I i I i I I i 4 I � r 1. I r. i i `i i I y i I I I I ;,MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA with issues which are common with all departments and also with any glaring deficiencies with the plan. The discussion on Friday will be on positions outside the bargaining units. The meeting will last one hour. The department heads were asked to designate someone from their department to attend if they are unable to do so. Prepared by: Lorraine Saeger MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•OES MOIRES ;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA I ' I Informal Council Meeting June 11, 1979 DEPARTMENT REFERRALS MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CFDAR RAPIDS -DES IIOIIIES W DATE RECD REFERRED TU DE ~ OOMM�TS/STATUSUBJECT Building Code - Greenhouses 6-11 H&IS Explore design standards and confer with City Manager re. administrative resolution to Blum complaint. Meet with Council in executive si,,,,Jon .. Linda Eaton Case 6-11 Legal for update prior to Iowa Civil Rights Commission hearing. Presentation to Council to address Housing Code - Historical Buildings 6-11 Legal ASAP current problems with College Block exemption Building, Hold in abeyance re. College Block Housing Code Enforcement 6-11 H&IS Building, Burkley Building and Black's Gaslight Village as relates to windows until after' I pnal Department address Council. Motorcycle stall to be metered w=� Burlington Street Parking Lot 6-11 Public Wks designated. 100 Block East Burlington Advise City Manager re. problems with Inoperative Equipment 6-11 Public Wks motor grader mold board. i Street Oiling Program 6-11 Public Wks Discuss with City Manager how oiling program will be started earlier next year, Attempt to get Pelling to oil ASAP or Conklin Lane 6-11 Public Wks schedule this as highest City priority when oiling program begins. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CFDAR RAPIDS -DES IIOIIIES -'MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA 1 Informal Council Meeting June 17, 7979 DEPARTMENT REFERRALS Page 2 SUBJECTc o REFERREDDATE ~ N COMMENTS/STATUS Selective Alley Oiling 6-11 Public Wks Council favors oiling of certain alleys Alley east of 500 block of S. Gilbert (Close Mansion) is to be oiled. Scott Boulevard right-of-way 6-11 Public Wks Right-of-way to be acquired at 1 IF, feet width as originally specified. Board and Commission applications 6-11 City Mgr Draft letter from Mayor to all Library Board applicants encouraging them to apply for other boards and commissions.:; Area Transportation Study 6-11 P&PD Advise City Manager regarding status of,l P&Z review of ATS "I" Street Water Damages 6-11 Legal Advise Council re. total amount of claims from water main break. Correspondence 6-11 City Mgr Letter to Jane Eikleberry re. Cot '1 decision not to confer in executiDe jf session. I ill 0 11CROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA i I Regular Council Meeting June 12, 1979 SUBJECT Library Board Motorcycle Parking Ralston Creek Obstruction Mowing of City right-of-way Widening Grand Avenue Freeway 518 Vacation DEPARTMENT REFERRALS O W DATE REFERRED DWATE H 6-12 11 City Mgr 6-12 11 Public Wks 6-12 11 Public Wks 6-12 Il parks & Rec City Mgr 6-12 Public Wks P&PD 6-12 (Dennis K. draft) 6-12 II FYI Neighborhood Site Improvement Program 116-12 11P&PD 6-12 I( P&PD MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES IIOIIIES Communicate with Tom Imnermann any problem areas re. collective bargaining Traffic Engineer's memo removed "n Consent Calendar. Discuss with City Manager. Check to determine if Jack Lee is - "dumping" in area of lst Avenue in accordance with decision of National Advise City Manager re, mowing schedule for this year. Review status of project relative to projected costs. Advise Council. Send letter to Downey with copy, Kassel re. misstatements in Kasse rs letter. Clemens Erdahl gone for three weeks ite during FY 80 plat show that all existing trees remain? MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA MINUTES OF STAFF MEETING June 20, 1979 Departmental referrals from the informal and formal Council meetings of June 18 and 19 were distributed to the staff (copy attached). Items for next week's agenda include: Public hearing on budget amendments i Resolution approving budget amendments Award of bids for furnishings and equipment for the Senior Center The City Manager introduced Ms. Nancy Seiberling of Project GREEN who gave a slide presentation of the work accomplished by Project GREEN. The staff met with Mr. Ken Ruberg of Congressman Leach's office to discuss some of the concerns of the staff. Pre red by: AD Lorraine Saeger V 5 MICROFILMED BY i JORM MICROLAB I CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOVIES i i Informal Council Meeting Odne i$ 1979 --IMICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA DEPARTMENT REFERRALS MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES tlolllEs I SUBJECT DATE REC D REFERRED TO DATE DUE E �/STATUS uiSchedule for P&Z discussion with PAD 1750 Rochester 6-18 City Mgr Council at informal meeting. Re. question of access to the wes Hy Vee LSNRD, Highway 6 6-18 Public Wks/ ._F Hy Vee onto Sand Road - Legal 1) Traffic engineer recommendation to Council re. Possible roblems with railroad crossing PW discuss with Manager) 2) Legal advise Council re. City lia- bility if this access crosses railroad tracks. Public Wks/ Advise Council re, cost estimate of i Ridge Road Drainage 6-18 Legal remedy for problem near Ball property and re. assessment of other problem il .1 on of City liability in general re. (. h I drainage problems. Send info to Council and to Mr. Hendershot. Meet with individual department heads to assess need for Civic Center, F Signs for handicapped accessibility 6-18 P&PD Rec. Center, parks, etc. I Will telephone and fountain in City Accessibility fixtures - handicapped 6-18 P&PD Plaza be accessible? Don't include agendas in Council packet.f Board and Commission agendas 6-18 City Mgr. Place copy in Council reading file. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES tlolllEs Imfermal Meeting June 18, 1979 ! Page 2 r ,MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA i DEPARTMENT REFERRALS MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES r.IORIES W SUBJECT c p REFERRED our � w COMMENTS/STATUS TO W Respond to Council inquiry re. why Printed Material 6-18 Finance packet material is usually printed on one side only. These may be donated for public Paving bricks for public use 6-18 Public Wks Respond to request from "Friends or Old Brick" and monitor installation as these will be in public right-of-way.' Establish a relevant policy. Bicyclists still using old crossing. Old First Avenue Pedestrian crossing 6-18 Public Wks Post signs to designate "Not a Crossing-', Use Sidewalk" Future absence 6-18 Info Carol deProsse will be gone 6-25 and 6-26 Report to Council - 1 Has projeS ?een Sturgis Corner Boat Ramp 6-18 P&PD resolved to be compatible with HUD-s1p 12) 75% low income benefit requirement, aJ Is Mace Braverman still willing to , donate this land fora boat ramp Handbill prohibition -18 Legal Does this restriction on commercial distribution violate "free speech" rights? Is such distribution permitted! Mali? Is there need fnr a revision re. conflicting language? I MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES r.IORIES MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA I Informal Council Meeting June 18, 1979 Pae3 r i i DEPARTMENT REFERRALS MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 110IDES W SUBJECTr� p AFM RED D COMMENTS/STATUS �F Parking on Broadway - 1600 block6-18 Public Wks Advise Council re, request by residents to move parking to opposite side. "F" Street right-of-way 6-18 Public Wks How can high pressure gas line be(_ 77 moved if building on site is proposed. Also status of ground. „Is H&IS this site one approved by HUD as acceptable for public housing? City Mgr/ City Manager contact Mary Ann Volm. Spouse Abuse 6-18 P&PD/ Is straw man purchase re. property Legal acquisition a possibility. Also Councilrpnnrt t s under which we can rehabilitate house with 1 Housing Rehab funds. Senior Center Building 6-18 P&PD Report to City Manager re. HUD sir"-)ff ' on purchase of the building. Cance get final approval from them? i I i — i MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 110IDES )FILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA DEPARTMENT REFERRALS MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 1101HES SMECT DATE f REERRED ouE COMMENTS/STATUS F � Reduced Cab Fares 6-19 City Mgr Schedule informal agenda time on 6-25-79 re. proposal by A Better Cab Company. Refer to Civil Rights Specialist for review. Beer Permit suspension 6-19 City Clerk �, Kerr-McGee permit to be suspended�,,,:r 1 14 days beginning July 9, 1979. i Plugged drains 6-19 Public Wks Check drains in Iowa Avenue parking lots 100 block of South Capitol P 6_ 19 Public Wks Advise City Mgr why 2 storm sewers (10 20 and ) are being replaced with only one 18" sewer. Boat Ramp - Stanley Report 6-19 P&PD Include in 6-22-79 Council Information :. Packet. i Garbage pickup 6-19 Public Wks Check four-plex on North Linn Str' taken off list - should be picker)`up. Property of Byron Ross. Mandatory Garbage Pickup Service 6-19 City Attny Discuss with legal staff A.G.'s opinion and advise Council re. private haulers being allowed to serve MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 1101HES '-I!U2ufILMED BY JORM MICROLAB • CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA The Building Line. Volume 22 RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING PLAN -CHECK FEES June 1979 Some time ago the City Council authorized the Building Official to charge plan -check fees for building permit applications. To date, the Building Official has charged plan -check fees by including fees for construction of minor buildings, such as one and two family homes, garages and remodel- ing, as part of the building permit fee. Important buildings, such as commercial and industrial buildings and all the urban renewal projects, had the plan -checking performed by the International Conference of Build- ing Officials in Kansas City. The fees for the plan -check on important buildings was assessed separately and billed separately to the applicant. Since the previous resolutions developed by Council did not specify as to how the Building Official was arriving at plan -check fees, and since the number of major projects has increased markedly in Iowa City, we felt there was a need for a new resolution to clarify procedures under which plan -check fees were assessed. On June 12, 1979, by unanimous vote of the City Council the following resolution for plan -check fees was adopted. All new construction shall be charged a plan -check fee as follows: 1. For single family and duplex dwellings the plan -check fee shall be considered as 501 of the building permit fee; 2. 'Plan -check fees for all other buildings shall be 65% of the building permit fees; 3. Remodeling or repair work valued less than $15,000 shall not be assessed a plan -checking fee. Building permit fees for single family and duplex dwellings have not been changed. This resolution merely clarifies that the present fee that is being paid will 'still be the same, however, 50% of that fee will be con- sidered as being a plan -check fee. The resolution also raised the value of repair and remodeling work requiring a plan -check fee from $1,000 to $15,000, a help to small job contractors and do-it-yourselfers. There is no change in the cost of permits for commercial or multi -family construc- tion, the time of anulication for a buil It has not been an uncommon practice for the Division of Building Inspec- tion to review a large project such as an apartment complex, or a commercial structure, only to have the project scrapped by the owner because of insufficient financing or various other problems. Some plans take up to ten days to completely review which is a considerable cost to the City. Without some type of plan -check fee paid in advance, later collection will be most difficult. Contractors should note that starting immediately plan -check fees will be assessed at the time of -application and before the plans will be reviewed. If the project should be terminated or if for some reason a permit is not obtained, the permit fee money will be returned to the applicant. There will be no refund of plan -check fees, 1393 MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEUAN NAI'I DS•7C' '1U MICS MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA 1 STATISTICS MINIMUM HOUSING During May, 1979, 254 structures were inspected containing 895 dwelling units and 594 rooming units. 385 dwelling units and 135 rooming units were found to be in compliance with the Min- imum Housing Code of Iowa City. 510 dwelling units and 459 rooming units did not comply with the Minimum (lousing Code. BUILDING INSPECTION During the month of May, 1979, 60 Building Permits, 28 Mechanical Permits, 24 Plumbing Permits, and 36 Electrical Permits have been issued by the City. The total value of all May construction in Iowa City is $1,477,722. There were 5 demolition permits issued. HOUSING ASSISTANCE PROGRAM During May, 1979, 8 units were brought into the Section 8 Program. Total units, Section 8 = 331. +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ SPOTS BEFORE YOUR EYES The Division of Building Inspection has recently initiated a new Notice of Inspec- tion device to help call violations to the contractors attention. When a violation is discovered during a building, electrical, plumbing or mechanical inspection, a flourescent orange label 1;" in diameter will be placed on the Notice of Inspection card posted on the property so that the violation can be brought ilmiediately to the contractors attention. This orange label is readily visible from long distances . and we hope that it will be more noticable to the contractor and property owner. Occassionally no one is on the Job site when the inspection is made or laborers forget to tell the supervisor about the inspection and the violation. Contractors have asked the City to help make certain that field notices are readily visible. The bright orange markings are designed to help contractors notice the inspection report more readily and to avoid costly delays by missed notices or expensive tear out of covered violations. 59i 'oN >!uu� tlM01'ALIOtlM ObZZS eMoi `,f3L3 eMol u046u}4seM '3 OLb HIYd sao}A.IaS u0}4oadsul pue 38tllsOd'S'R 66LsnoN 10 4uaw4ueda0 LttH Y10H . 44 LO eMol 3 o xm MICROFILMED By JORM MICROLAB r.EUAP RAPIDS.acI, •ionirS MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA City of Iowa City Department of Housing and Inspection Services 410 E. Washington Iowa City, Iowa 52240 l• IQId Bill ll. S. POSTAGE PdIB WA CIN, IOWA P'rmR Na 155 'su0l4eL0tA patanoa ;o gno teal aAEsuadxa to saollou passlw Aq s'elap ALIS00 Alone of pue ALlpeat atow titodat uoEgDadsul a41 aol:Iou s.Aoloetguoo dLa4 04 pau6lsap.ate 0UulJew a6ueto 1461.Eq a4l alglsln AI}peat ate saDllou plat; leyl uleltao a4ew dLay of Allo a44 p84ar aney stolaetguoD •uolleLolA ay; pue uollaadsul a44 Inoge toslntadns a44 LLal o; 486to; statogei to apew sl uolloadsul ay; ua4M ails qof a4l uo sl auo ou ALLeuolsseoo0 'tauMo Altadotd pue iogoe.Aluoa ay; of algeollou atow aq LLIM ;l 4q; ado4 am pue saDuelslp BU01 wot; aLglslA ALlpeaA S} LageL a6ueto sl41 uotjua4je sioloeiluoa ayl of Alagelpawwl 446notq aq ueo uolgeLolA ayg le4l os (4jadoid ayg uo palsod pied uolloadsul ;o aolloN a4l uo paoeLd aq LLIM talawelp ul „hL LageL a6ueto luaosatnoL; e tuolloadsul,leolue4om to 6ulgwnLd 'Leoltgoala '6ulpLlnq a 6ul.inp patanooslp;sl uollelolA a ua4M •uolgualle stoloetluoo a44 og suolgeLolA Lleo dla4 of aolnap uoll oadsul:;o aolION Mau a palelllul (L4u8oaa say uolloadsuL 6ulpLlnq ;o u0lslAl0.a4.L,. S343 bf10A 38OJ39 SlOdS 'TEE = 8 uoT3oaS 's4Tun Te301 'we1801d B u01300S aql o3uT zg3no.xq aaaM slTun 8 '6L6I 'AeW BuTma WVdDONd 9ONVISISSV DNISfIOH 'panssT s3Twtod uoi4TTowap S ataM atagy 'ZZL'LL6'T$ ST AIT eMoT UT uoT3onalsuoo ,(EW TIE 30 anTeA Telol ayl Al TD ay3 Aq panssT uoaq aney SITwtad TOOT1230T3 9£ pus `s3Tw10d EuTgwnTd 4Z 's3Twtad TE0Tuey3011 8Z 'stitwtad BuTPTTng 09 '6L6T 'AEW ;o yluow ay3 EuTtna NOI.L39dSNI DNIOTIng 'apoO BuTsnoll wnwTuTIq ay3 yITM ,(Tdwo:) lou pTp s3Tun ?UTWOOt 6S6 pue slTun BuTTTaMP OIS 'A3T0 OMOI ;o apoD BuTsnol4 wnwT -uTW ayl g2TM aouaTTdwoo uT aq of puno; ataM slTun EuTmoot SET pue slTun BuTTTaMP S8£ 'sl?un BuTwoot 665 pue s3Tun BuTTTaMP 568 guTuTeluoo paloadsuT ataM satnlonals 65Z '6L6T 'Ault EuTtna SO I.LS I lV,LS MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•Dr% 1101:1rs DNISnOH Wf1WINIW LMED BY JuRM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS ADD DES M01MES• in1'li, Plaza Previews City of Iowa City, 410 E. Washington, Iowa City, IA 52240 (319) 354-1800 Vol. 2, No. 4 Paul Glaves, Development Coordinator Linda Schreiber, Editor GOVERNOR ROBERT LUCAS SQUARE FOUNTAIN Attention will certainly focus in the heart of City Plaza at the point where Dubuque and College Streets meet. This is the location of the Governor Robert Lucas Square Fountain. The creation of an idea of many citizens, business representatives, City Council, staff and consultants. Like City Plaza, the Fountain is nearly complete. A local firm, Planned Environments, designed the project, and are supervising its construction. Landscape architect, Bob Satter, said that the Fountain's concept originates from the historical development of Iowa City and the City's association with the Iowa River. The Fountain's water movement in pools and ripples creates an Impression of an oasis in the midst of everyday hussle and activity. The name, Governor Robert Lucas Square, was derived from our community's history. Lucas was the first territorial governor of Iowa. Interest will center on three copper hairpin sculptures in the fountain. The sculptures will eventually oxidize to complement the kiosk roofs located throughout the plaza. When the Pool is dry, the sculpture's design provides winter interest in the plaza area. Outlining the fountain are two pools which can be kept dry and also used as a stage area for performing artists, speakers or other activities. A storage area located beneath the lower pool houses the equipment to pump water into the sculpture. Chlorine and anti -form injectors are automatically added to the water. Once the water is in the sculpture gravity takes over and the water cascades into the pools. The lower pool wall and planters that surround the fountain are constructed at seating height. Conveniently, the windows in Plaza Centre One also provide comfortable seating. Stage lights on the large poles control the three levels of lighting In the fountain area: spotlights may be used to draw out sculpture features or stage events; evening lighting will highlight events and activities; security lighting for pedestrian safety. The stage area has been designed to Include electricity for amplifiers and speakers. Both the stage lighting and the fountain may be remote controlled. Finishing touches in the Lucas Square stage area include paving the area with old Purington paving bricks which were removed from under the concrete on College and Dubuque Streets. 1 v � "ICROFWIEO 8, JORM MICROLAB :;J LMED BY JORhI FtICROLAB City Plaza fountain can bt edited Committee was formed in Nuvember, the Fountain's $131,000 total cost, providing $50,000 matching funds. CEDAR RAPIDS APID DES MOIPIES, MVIA to volunteer contribution The Governor Lucas Square 1977 to raise funds for tiie Fountain's construction. Of $81,000 will be raised by the Committee. Iowa City is The Jaycee's donated $2,000 from the proceeds of the carnival held last year on the site of the Old Capitol Center at a cermony in Lucas Square on June 14. This donation leaves the Committee $2,000 short of its $81,000 goal. Chairperson Tom Wegman credits 80-85% of the donations to downtown businesses. Committee members employed a variety of fund raising activities, entitled Fountain Turn - On. Mock invitations were sent to a nine course dinner. Individuals were requested to donate to the Fountain what they would have spent for this night out on the town. Iowa Citians have had and will have another opportunity to "own a piece of the downtown" by purchasing a brick from the Committee during Sidewalk Sale Days. Those of you who are skeptical that the bricks may be resold to another individual will be able to check and point with pride to your brick which contributed to the downtown beautification. Around the fountain, each of the bricks sold will be numbered in chalk for easy identification on September 22 at the Grand Opening Day Art Surrounds The Plaza. Watch for a complete listing of events in later publications. CITY PLAZA is taking shape. Most of the landscaping is complete. Work crews are busily adding final touches to the Plaza. Benches and other amenities are In place, crews have now shifted their attention to brick paving. Hastings Paving of Queens, New York, paving subcontractors, have completed laying the brick on the southern portion of Dubuque Street. Before the bricks are set into place store front to store front throughout the Plaza, the Hastings crew grades the surface and lays a two inch asphalt base. Grout spread between the bricks and liquid neoprene stabilizes and holds them in place. Dubuque Street paving will be completed first, thereby allowing crews to finish the playground before the paving on College Street begins. The remaining Plaza area east of Penney's to Linn Street will be completed in coordination with the new Public Library. OPEN FOR BUSINESS AS USUAL. The moving dust has settled at 112 E. College Street, the new location of Buc Leathers. The display area in their new location has increased and women's merchandise expanded, and many new exciting items added. With Buc's move to City Plaza now complete, preparations are underway to move the "last of the Clinton Street modulars" to the West Branch Community School District where these buildings will be used for school facilities. Also being removed are the dual purpose planter boxes lining Clinton Street. When these boxes were filled with plant materials, the planters helped to beautify and protect the modulars from vehicular traffic. The boxes, now worn and Jagged, are being put to rest. The City is recycling some of the plant materials to a more permanent home to landscape the City Service Building area. Fifteen 30 -minute parallel parking meters will be Installed on the east side of Clinton Street for shoppers' convenience. STARS IN THE BARS Speaking of volunteer efforts, the Iowa City -Johnson County Arts Council sponsored a benefit to raise money for the Community Arts Center. "Stars in the Bars" was a way for the Arts Council to offer the public something in return for their support, commented Marilyn Levin, former chairperson of the Arts Council. Forty-two local performers provided four evenings of first rate entertainment at Maxwell's, The Fieldhouse, Sanctuary and Grand Daddy's. The proceeds from the $2,00/person cover charge will go the Arts Center. What better way to support our local arts'. CITY OF IOWA CITY DEPT. OF COMIX DCVELOPMUT CIVIC CENTER IOWA CITY, IOWA 52140 MICROFILMED B, JORM MICROLAB Lunn og P: aC•aI •i,,; .;, ., BULK RATE U. S. POSTAGf PAID Iowa clrr, sown Permit No. 155 GI:I.RUI-ILMEU BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS MID DES MOINES, IOWA Loom g weniments 1 in DOCU E JNT AVA1LABLG be ruts cheaper and beer By NEAL R. PEIRCE 0 lm w� M Nr•. r.rAo Local EY, CALIF. — Local L11, meAb acreea ID:der moan and gran under Proposition 13-Ilke pressures, and predict a service disaster if their federal revemle4har. Ing money Is terminated. But they'ro largely Ignoring an exciting any of proposals that could dramatically reduce the bill they pay for police and fire protection. to all, the "public safety" functions consume MS percent to 15 percent of local budgets, if their tate could be cut substantially, fiscal pressures would relax quickly. And, claims the Berkeley -based Institute for Local Self-0ovfmmeot, the quality of fire and police service could be upgraded In the process. Tbs beiitate, tacked away In the bowels of the rambling old Quemoat BaW bete, has uaed a $M.000 grant from the Lilly Foundation to ebur, at is remarkable IN of proposals to reduce public safety budgets. Police and firefighters would be required to enlist for stints, like a true military force. Cities would take over fire insurance Indemnity for sit proper. ids within their borders. Indeed of sitting Idly In ftrebowas waiting for C" firefightere would we all their 47 sera -emergency Ila conducetng a wrk1'ould DhW dmo twoy purer profeorlonal tasks now artiod out by uniformed police and firefighters. Summaries of all then money-mv. In Idea were circulated widely to Intel officials acres the country; the Berkeley Institute offered fall fesw- " Studies. Until Preposition is pamud last year, the response was tihBy se W. tlloes rhes, Igdrls re IncraesW, list only 15 jusisdic- tions have hope .experimentation With the imdtute's propaeed reforms. Wb'e to his=? tathaegie laid officials? Obstructionist public aloe? Both, without gwstlsa. Bet Institute Director John Baallban, termer mayor of Oekdn4 aegpeis another, brg* IavleibNalplt 0. lees) Mediu, wbdb aoaeiaauy peaasa a req lea! official who tries a moo- aamOt iesoatla and lbs ►alb. Municipally provided fire tswoce for W a CHO property owners might Involve the most dramatic cost savings. Us not ef the problem Is said to be IM divorce at lnorexe under. writing (raw fire pnveatia s and fire ttgltting. Iaevnna eanpedas have Blue Intered b [fro preresuoq u fhl loves an as Olay m simply Increase rates. Insurance -rating m sten don't credit cities for f re pe -1 office Major savinp won't come, the Isutete sap, out "a single entity has management costed over the IoW fire protectls, sutler —fin Ilgbting, prwvmllon end Insurance — provldteg ere istatRaw and responsive system" LoW gee• eramest, Ire proposed, should be that eouty. With the municipality writing policies W May pswnlmu sae for reddaad, the his commission W win owes it and profit eegsete- tica of private insure" — an= ee petceei of the cat of fire luurnoe — would be eliminated. Lower Insurance rates would be a otroq Incentive for residents to support active Ilnprueestia efforts. Boullhae acknowledges municipal urn lr m W try, motl araq d i,depeadvet lm,ra,ce sgsate and broken, But he thinks The big insurance companies might me a Fide opportunity In V , , " g dun with catastrophic M Iwnaet — for amus unlikely event as the grunt Chicago lin of Ip1. The big can lrw "old ave" the fmmamu n art of peprwasbow eaiin lggg� with iena�& jesWtiny new igwls end Iedir" beeneheld DA 67Y7 Of the trNlual M ds- pastowd _'thane lotions with W s a rid Ike fUtibone dtheir �WAPW. ew, — ahrla law "ser err alder bee, affected by +sial Other city personnel, released from their Our mat &a figlltly. dolles when Ma�itam iths. fighters eyed ue most then 6 percent ef their wort boom Bghusa ars As a major reform, the Msitete propos flet all of flragob s' me. 6nUdly oodr andyedto I meororbg Bre MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS.DEt 11j)jurS hazards. Tbese ernes -trained fire - 40I Mospecton WNW to called by elecelwnlc pager who nsaded for M fighting. "BeiWy ispaetios," says Haub" "Vold may gei nmigk- as Wheproolio�"lshouo lly reduce fire @Wb could be radige. Comb of cally tt e lly reduced. AA bandM of dtW keludlag kr* field. Orb, PW/Idd, NJ., and Ams, a., have Ingo to experiment with thbnew approwch. Bak police and fire services, tr Insula says, are burdened by a M0.10 -3e yourpeatest path that fags amplges' open'. out rst6'snnt yeah.11"lock. !o" lir Ith Iaaa by Inactivity and pike officers soured from disavemble and Men gapublic con- ujnaMkaaW dWNBty clw, Aad solea west Meq pressure to earicb. already Penrose pada plass, which semelMes sad M parent ei ssdrter edlveeffieora WhIM have a[have hsgo te ehlfi te (far les amides to pay d esladlPUMMa VatY wile .ndrzIniz than id wool of rune m � raNlre ewau afflesu, ter Ir1aaLM. Leal aessttraveaa min PAW of aelen and qutel-wiser wt opposition to achieve Seth reforms, but the potential payoff Is alar enough major public urlap � nately. Can the o m realistically be seldeved? Agals, the answer providing thepublic -iit� with W media Vida{ the tend — sawn" and then sapporfa than /ororomaat officials who Iamoaahate tN co npbsivetbannrwaysotry. 1315 :EDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA 9 i ;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB • CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA INFORMAL COUNCIL DISCUSSION JULY 2, 1979 0 INFORMAL COUNCIL DISCUSSION: July 2, 1979, 1:30 PM in the Conference Room at the Civic Center. Mayor Pro tem Balmer presiding. COUNCILMEMBERS PRESENT: Balmer, deProsse, Neuhauser, Perret, Roberts. Absent: Erdahl, Vevera. STAFFMEMBERS PRESENT: Berlin, Stolfus, Helling, Karr, P&Z Comm. Jakobsen. Others present for certain discussions, as noted. TAPE-RECORDED on Reel ;19-19, Side 2, 1 -End APPLICATIONS TO PLANNING & ZONING COMM. Boothroy present. '1750 Rochester' Schnittjer present. 1. Boothroy related previous history, presented revised PAD plan, the question is the extension of Windsor Ct. 33 lots could take advantage of this extension. 2. Schnittjer distributed a letter from developer Glasgow. City Mgr. Berlin commented that either the City agrees to Glasgow's terms regarding the street and stornwater detention, or he will develop 7 properties with access to Rochester or Seventh Ave. (a density loss of 1/2). 3. A majority of Councilmembers will not vote for the present PAD. 1-323 AGENDA 323-1040 1. Boat Ram at Stur is FerrySite-Riverfront Comm. Ch r. Gilpin Mi kman, Kraft, Showalter, Commrs. Knight and Sokol present. Council discussed need to resolve ownership of the land, an agreement to be negotiated regarding ramp site, where both sides agree, but do not concede anything regarding ownership. A majority of Councilmembers agreed that Stanley Consultants should work on the detailed study, necessary for BOR funding. Parks & Rec, Comm. to review report from Kraft, 6/29/79, and comment on it. 2. Ventura/TanglewoodPaving-Plastino present. Plastino comm on Glasgow letter of 6/29/79. N1 is correct, sewer will be extended. N2, unpaved extension, cannot be escrowed, can assess when City finds out what the abutting owner is going to do. N3, no action will be taken. N4, PW recommends standard cross-section, curb & gutter. q5, Legal is working on quiet title action. Berlin advised that a drainage easement will be needed from Jensens, which the City could negotiate for a trade- off for a portion of the assessment. Council will need to decide an assessment for Jensen & amend the Res. of Necessity. 3. Paper Recycling Plastino present. P astil— no commented that to add paper to the landfill would shorten its life (10-12 years) by 3 to 6 months. A majority of Council - members agreed to keep on with the project. 4. Parking Ramp _onnBBlock 64 Glaves, Plastino present. Sta F aplaine— d why sprinkler system was needed in this ramp and not for Block 83 Ramp. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 1101RES MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB + CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MiNEs N ;MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA Informal Council Page 2 July 2, 1979 5. Purchase of Ralston Creek area Plastino memo in 6/29 packet noted. There were no ob,lections to purchase. The memo i•� regarding funding for Ralston Creek projects will be discussed at goal -setting session. 6. Clinton St. Parking Area Glaves present. 'posts are removed for parallel parking, 5 spaces could be gained with angle parking. Staff considered loading zones, 2 bus stops, & turning radius needed by trucks at alley. A majority of Council members present agreed to leave the parallel parking as is. SENIOR CENTER PREL. PLANS Kraft, Meisel & Architect Nowysz present 1040-1816 wiiF_omnrs. Car eton, Sumnerwil1 & Sando. Nowysz presented information for all floors of the Senior Center, & distributed the Site Plan. All changes were explained. Space allottedand appropriate funding for City offices was discussed. Supervisor Donnelley has said that the County would fund only $50,000 of the $61,000 kitchen equipment costs, so the County & Rev. Welsh will have to delete items from kitchen costs. If the City uses general fund monies to reduce the obligation to the Block Grant program, possibly no rent will be paid, & of the $200,000 costs for City remodeling, the value of the write-down on the land could amount to $50,000 and would be a non-federal credit. Nowysz quoted a $48. a square foot cost for remodeling. The additional floor (ceiling overdining area) will be shown as an alternate in the bidding document. The project for the City offices will be a separate bid (not the heating, cooling, lighting, painting). i ! City Mgr. Berlin pointed out that the Senior Center Commission had been interviewing candidates for the Senior Center Director,and they were recommending Bette Meisel for Director. BLOCK 64 HOTEL Glaves present. 1816-1970 Memo i- n 6%29/79 packet noted. Glaves proposed securing an easement for 25' north of the ramp, so that construction equipment could have access for expansion of the ramp (2 additional stories, 200 spaces). There was a Council consensus to require the easement and to approve I issuance of Revenue Bonds for the project. CITY PAY PLAN Vitosh & Brown present. 1970 -End ro—Ii wn was complimented on her handling of the issue at the 6/26 meeting, along with all Staff connected with the situation at Woodfields. Berlin called attention to the Job Evaluation Plan from Dept. of Personnel. The phases of the study were outlined by Brown as including surveys, job classifications, etc. She noted cooperation from the Fire Union & AFSCME. Letter from Management Compensation Team noted. Projected cost for salary increases for management & confidential areas were distributed. Vitosh advised that ranges had been extended and 20 employees would be earning merit because of it, approximately a cost of $9,000. Berlin did not want to deal with accumulation of vacation days to 44 days, as the City would then have to deal with it in collective bargaining. Resolution adopting the pay plan will be on Tues. agenda. Meeting adjourned 4:45 PM. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB + CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MiNEs N ,hIICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA 1 C30) INFORMAL COUNCIL DISCUSSION JULY 2, 1979 J INFORMAL COUNCIL DISCUSSION: July 2, 1979, 1:30 PM in the Conference Room at the Civic Center. Mayor Pro tem Balmer presiding. COUNCILMEMBERS PRESENT: Balmer, deProsse, Neuhauser, Perret, Roberts. Absent: Erdahl, Vevera. STAFFMEMBERS PRESENT: Berlin, Stolfus, Helling, Karr, P&Z Comm. Jakobsen. Others present for certain discussions, as noted. TAPE-RECORDED on Reel N79-19, Side 2, 1 -End. APPLICATIONS TO PLANNING & ZONING COMM, Boathroy present. 1-323 '1750 Rochester' Schnittjer present. . Boothroy related previous history, presented revised PAD plan, the question is the extension of Windsor Ct. 33 lots could take advantage of this extension. 2. Schnittjer distributed a letter from developer Glasgow. City Mgr. Berlin commented that either the City agrees to Glasgow's terms regarding the street and stormwater detention, or he will develop 7 properties with access to Rochester or Seventh Ave. (a density loss of 1/2). 3. A majority of Councilmembers will not vote for the present PAD. i f`A AGENDA 323-1040 1. Boat Ramp at Sturgis Ferry Site-Riverfront Comm. Chr. Gilpin Milkman, Kraft, Showalter, Commrs. Knight and Sokol present. Council discussed need to resolve ownership of the land, an agreement to be negotiated regarding ramp site, where both sides agree, but do not concede anything regarding ownership. A majority of Councilmembers agreed that Stanley Consultants should work on the detailed study, necessary for BOR funding. Parks & Rec. Comm. to review report from Kraft, 6/29/79, and comment on it. 2. Ventura/Tanglewood Paving-Plastino present. Pino comm Glasgow letter of 6/29/79. N1 is correct, sewer will be extended. H2, unpaved extension, cannot be escrowed, can assess when City finds out what the abutting owner is going to do. N3, no action will be taken. .N4, PW recommends standard cross-section, curb & gutter, #5, Legal is working on quiet title action. Berlin advised that a drainage easement will be needed from Jensens, which the City could negotiate for a trade- off for a portion of the assessment. Council will need to decide an assessment for Jensen & amend the Res. of Necessity. 3. Papp�e�r�Re__cyyc��lin.g9. Plastino present. astinocommented that to add paper to the landfill would shorten its life (10-12 years) by 3 to 6 months. A majority of Council - members agreed to keep on with the project. 4. Parking Ramp on Block 64 Glaves, Plastino present. Stafexned why sprinkler system was needed in this ramp and not for Block 83 Ramp. MICROMMED BY + JORM MICROLAB I CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 110IBES I k j i i i 4 f j' Vitosh advised that ranges had been extended and 20 employees would be earning merit because of it, approximately a cost of $9,000. Berlin did not want to deal with accumulation of vacation days to 44 days, as the City would then have to deal with it in collective bargaining. Resolution adopting the pay plan will be on Tues. agenda. I Meeting adjourned 4:45 P14. i � I I I MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES f hI1CROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA Informal Council Page 2 July 2, 1979 5. Purchase of Ralston Creek area Plastino memo in 6/29 packet noted. There were no objections to purchase. The memo regarding funding for Ralston Creek projects will be discussed at goal -setting session. 6. Clinton St. Parking Area Claves present. IT post care remove for parallel parking, 5 spaces could be gained with angle parking. Staff considered loading zones, 2 bus stops, & turning radius needed by trucks at alley. A majority of Council members present agreed to leave the parallel parking as is. SENIOR CENTER PREL. PLANS Kraft, Meisel & Architect Nowysz present with omnrs. Car eton, Summer -will & Sando. Nowysz presented information for all floors of the Senior Center, & distributed the Site Plan. All changes were explained. Space allottedand appropriate funding for City offices was discussed. Supervisor Donnelley has said that the County would fund only $50,000 of the $61,000 kitchen equipment costs, so the County & Rev. Welsh will have to delete items from kitchen costs. If the City uses general fund monies to reduce the obligation to the Block Grant program, possibly no rent will be paid, & of the $200,000 costs for City remodeling, the value of the write-down on the land could amount to $50,000 and would be a non-federal credit. Nowysz quoted a $48. a square foot cost for remodeling. The additional floor (ceiling over dining area) will be shown as an alternate in th- bidding document. The project for the City offices will be a separate bid (not the heating, cooling, lighting, painting). City Mgr. Berlin pointed out that the Senior Center Commission had been interviewing candidates for the Senior Center Director,and they were reconnending Bette Meisel for Director. 1040-1816 BLOCK 64 HOTEL Glaves present. 1816-1970 Memo in 6%29/79 packet noted. Glaves proposed securing an easement for 25' north of the ramp, so that construction equipment could have access for expansion of the ramp (2 additional stories, 200 spaces). There was a Council consensus to require the easement and to approve issuance of Revenue Bonds for the project. CITY PAY PLAN Vitosh & Brown present. 1970 -End Brown was complimented on her handling of the issue at the 6/26 meeting, along with all Staff connected with the situation at Woodfields. Berlin called attention to the Job Evaluation Plan from Dept. of Personnel. The phases of the study were outlined by Brown as including surveys, job classifications, etc. She noted cooperation from the Fire Union & AFSCME. Letter from Management Compensation Team noted. Projected cost for salary increases for management & confidential areas were distributed. I