Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1979-10-16 Regular MeetingLOONCIL MEETING OF OCTOBER 16, 1979 F Mg feh;yarr4Jr Mar lug mi Auerseair �oe 2 i 3 ' 4 T 6 Y 8 18 II r. JORM MICROLAB ROLL CALL REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF OCTOBER 16, 1979 7:30 P.M. BALMER dePROSSE ERDAHL NEUHAUSER PERRET ROBERTS VEVERA PRESENT MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOINES ABSENT I I I f I i I I L' i d ROLL CALL REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF OCTOBER 16, 1979 7:30 P.M. BALMER dePROSSE ERDAHL NEUHAUSER PERRET ROBERTS VEVERA PRESENT MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOINES ABSENT COMPLETE DESCRIPTION OF COUNCIL ACTIVITIES OCTOBER 16, 1979 Iowa City Council, reg. mtg., 10/16/79, 7:30 P.M. at the Civic Center. Mayor Vevera presiding. Councilmembers present: Balmer, deProsse, Erdahl, Neuhauser, Roberts, Vevera. Absent: Perret. Staff - members present: Berlin, Melling, Hayek, Chiat, Stolfus, Karr. Council minutes tape-recorded on Tapes 79-24, Side 2, 2230 -end & Tape 79-26, Side 1, 175-260. Mayor Vevera proclaimed October 20, 1979 as WSUI Day, and October 15, /936 1979 as White Cane Safety Day. Moved by Balmer, seconded by Erdahl, that the following items and recommendations in the Consent Calendar be received, or approved, and/or adopted, as presented: Approval of Official Actions, reg. Council mtg., 10/2/79, subject to correction, as recommended by City Clerk. x Minutes of Boards and Commissions: 'Committee on Community 191 Needs-10/3/79;'Riverfront Comm. -10/3/79; 'Senior Center Comm.- 9/19/79 & 9/26/79;"Housing Appeals Bd.-9/27/79;'Airport Comm. - 9/20/79 & 9/27/79;`Parks & Rec. Comm. -9/12/79; Civil Service Comm.- 9/22/79;'Human Rights Comm.-9/4/79;'Bd. of Library Trustees - 9/29/79. Permit Resolutions, Book 59, as recommended by the City Clerk. RES. 79-493, p. 1288, APPROVING CLASS C LIQUOR AND RES. 79-494, p. 1289, SUNDAY SALES FOR ASK CO. dba FELIX AND OSCAR'S, 5 South Dubuque. Correspondence: Letter from IDOT re I-80 lighting conversion, 9 noted. Letter from Airport Comm. Chrp. requesting appropriation of additional funds for FY80, referred to City Mgr. for reply. Applications for use of Streets and Public Grounds: University of Iowa Homecoming Council request re street dance on October 19, _1251Z 1979, denied. I Affirmative roll call vote unanimous, 6/0, Perret absent. Moved by deProsse, seconded by Erdahl, to schedule discussion re r recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Comm. to adopt the Ralston II Creek Watershed Management Plan for informal discussion. Motion carried unanimously, 6/0, Perret absent. Ernie Lehman presented concerns from the Downtown Association regarding their advertising for the opening of the downtown ramp, and read a resolution of the Board re concern over the negative response by /9 some Councilmembers to Zuchelli & Assoc. proposal for a major department MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOIRES COunci'^.tivities October 16, 1979 Page 2 store with the downtown hotel, and urging reconsideration of the initial reaction to the proposal. Mayor Vevera advised that Council had requested further information from the consultant, possibily available in two weeks. Moved by Balmer, seconded by Erdahl, to accept the correspondence from the Downtown Assn. Motion carried unanimously, 6/0. Katherine Hull presented a resolution in behalf of the Univ. of Iowa Student Senate calling for updating and enforcement of the snow removal ordinances. /951 City Mgr. Berlin stated that the staff is preparing input for Council on an amendment, and the Student Senate would be contacted for Council's informal discussion. John Suchomel, 330 N. Lucas, wished all candidates 19 51, best of luck in the primary election. Robert Ogeson, 305 Woodridge Ave., called attention to the proposed use of Woodridge as an access road for construction vehicles and equipment for the N. Branch of Ralston Creek Detention Dams, as recommended by Stanley Consultants, and requested that Seventh Ave. be used instead. Berlin advised that staff would look at alternatives. Public hearing was held of the assessment of the costs of Weed/Grass 1915V Control to the County Auditor. No one was present for discussion. Moved by deProsse, seconded by Roberts, to adopt RES. 79-496, Bk. 59, pp. 1291-1292, CERTIFYING DELINQUENT WEED CONTROL CHARGES TO THE COUNTY 9 5 7 AUDITOR. Affirmative roll call vote unanimous, 6/0, Perret absent. Mayor Vevera announced two vacancies on the Board of Appeals for /?5s-/ three-year terms expiring 12/31/82, appointments to be made at the 11/27/79 meeting. Moved by Neuhauser, seconded by Roberts, to approve the recommendation of the Iowa City Board of Education that Bill Kidwell be appointed as the Board's representative on the Mayor's Youth Employment Board. Motion carried unanimously, 6/0. Mayor Vevera announced the birth of twin grand -daughters this morning. City Mgr. Berlin called attention to the meeting with the Electrical Board, which has been set for 7:30 Wednesday evening, to /96� discuss recent issues regarding staff. He also advised that the staff is contacting other communities re suggestions on Standard Metropolitan 1?4 / Statistical Area (SMSA) procedures. City Atty. Hayek reported that regarding the article in the Daily Iowan re access by Council candidates to residence halls, that there is a policy voted on by the students to /9/, not allow soliciting door-to-door in the dorms. The decision of the Baculis Trailer Court matter was discussed. Hayek asked if it was Council's wish that he investigate. Council did not direct him to do SO. Moved by Balmer, seconded by Roberts, to adopt RES. 79-497, Bk. 59, pp. 1293-1296, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO SIGN AN EASEMENT RELEASE FOR AN EXISTING SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT ACROSS LOT 4 EASTDALE MALL AND DIRECTING / 9ti 5 THE CITY CLERK TO RECORD A NEW SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT ACROSS LOT 4 EASTDALE MALL. Affirmative roll call vote unanimous, 6/0, Perret absent. p. 1297seconded , ACCEPTINGTHEREALIGutadopt R9B NEDSANITARYSEWERONLOT 4EASTDALE MALL. Affirmative roll call vote unanimous, 6/0, Perret absent. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOIIIES Council*�'tivities r October ,u, 1979 Page 3 Mov d by PP. 1298e1299,BESTABLISHINGded JUSTYdeProsseCOMPENSATIONoFORDACQUISITION 0 REAL 59, / PROPERTY FOR THE SOUTH BRANCH RALSTON CREEK STORMWATER DETENTION PROJECT. Affirmative roll call vote unanimous, 6/0, Perret absent. Moved by Balmer, seconded by Neuhauser, to adopt RES. 79-500, Bk. 59, pp. 1300-1302, AUTHORIZING RENEWAL OF A CONTRACT FOR IN -BUS ADVERTISING WITH ADS ADVERTISING. Affirmative roll call vote unanimous, Ufa 6/0, Perret absent. Moved by Balmer, seconded by Neuhauser, to adjourn the meeting, 8:10 P.M. Motion carried unanimously, 6/0, Perret absent. I MAYOR ATTEST: CITY CLERK i I MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB ', CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES a d � A 1 i I I" COMPLETE DESCRIPTION OF COUNCIL ACTfVfTIES OCTOBER 16, 1979 Iowa City Council, reg. mtg., 10/16/79, 7:30 P.M. at the Civic Center. Mayor Vevera presiding. Councilmembers present: Balmer, deProsse, Erdahl, Neuhauser, Roberts, Vevera. Absent: Perret. Staff - members present: Berlin, Melling, Hayek, Chiat, Stolfus, Karr. Council minutes tape-recorded on Tapes 79-24, Side 2, 2230 -end b Tape 79-26, Side 1, 175-260. Mayor Vevera proclaimed October 20, 1979 as WSUI Day, and October 15, 1979 as White Cane Safety Day. Moved by Balmer, seconded by Erdahl, that the following items and recommendations in the Consent Calendar be received, or approved, and/or adopted, as presented: Approval of Official Actions, reg. Council mtg., 10/2/79, subject to correction, as recommended by City Clerk. Minutes of Boards and Commissions: 'Committee on Community Needs-10/3/79;4Riverfront Comm.-10/3/79;'Senior Center Comm. - 9/19/79 6 9/26/79;'Nousing Appeals Bd. -9/27/79•'Airport Comm. - 9/20/79 G 9/27/79; 'Parks S Rec. Comm. -9/12/79• Civil Service Come.- 9/22/79;'Human Rights Comm. -9/4/79; 'Bd. of Library Trustees - 9/29/79. Permit Resolutions, Book 59, as recommended by the City Clerk. RES. 79-493, p. 1288, APPROVING CLASS C LIQUOR AND RES. 79-494, p. 1289, SUNDAY SALES FOR ASK CO. dba FELIX AND OSCAR'S, 5 South Dubuque. Correspondence: Letter from 1007 re 1-80 lighting conversion, noted. Letter from Airport Comm. Chrp. requesting appropriation of additional funds for FY80, referred to City Mgr. for reply. Applications for use of Streets and Public Grounds: University Of Iowa Homecoming Council request re street dance on October 19, 1979, denied. Affirmative roll call vote unanimous, 6/0, Perret absent. Moved by deProsse, seconded by Erdahl, to schedule discussion re recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Comm. to adopt the Ralston Creek Watershed Management Plan for informal discussion. Motion carried unanimously, 6/0, Perret absent. Ernie Lehman presented concerns from the Downtown Association regarding their advertising for the opening of the downtown ramp, and read a resolution of the Board re concern over the negative response by some Councilmembers to Zuchelli 3 Assoc, proposal for a major department MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES NOIRES y h .t- �.. Council Activities _.. . Octobe 6, 1979 b= Page 2 AVAII.ABL L store with the downtown hotel, and urging reconsideration of the initial reaction to the proposal. Mayor Vevera advised that Council had requested further information from the consultant, possibily available in two weeks. Moved by Balmer, seconded by Erdahl, to accept the correspondence from the Downtown Assn. Motion carried unanimously, 6/0. Katherine Mull presented a resolution in behalf of the Univ. of Iowa Student Senate calling for updating and enforcement of the snow removal ordinances. City Mgr. Berlin stated that the staff is preparing input for Council on an amendment, and the Student Senate would be contacted for Council's informal discussion. John Suchomel, 3301,1 N. Lucas, wished all candidates best of luck in the primary election. Robert Ogeson, 305 Woodridge Ave., called attention to the proposed use of Woodridge as an access road for construction vehicles and equipment for the N. Branch of Ralston Creek Detention Dams, as recommended by Stanley Consultants, and requested that Seventh Ave. be used instead. Berlin advised that staff would look at alternatives. Public hearing was held of the assessment of the costs of Weed/Grass Control to the County Auditor. No one was present for discussion. Moved by deProsse, seconded by Roberts, to adopt RES. 79-496, Bk. 59, pp. 1291-1292, CERTIFYING DELINQUENT WEED CONTROL CHARGES TO THE COUNTY AUDITOR. Affirmative roll call vote unanimous, 6/O, Perrot absent. Mayor Vevera announced two vacancies on the Board of Appeals for three-year terms expiring 12/31/82, J� appointments to be made at the 11/27/79 meeting. Moved by Neuhauser, seconded by Roberts, to approve the recommendation of the Iowa City Board of Education that Bill Kidwell be appointed as the Board's representative on the Mayor's Youth Employment Board. Motion carried unanimously, 6/O. Mayor Vevera announced the birth of twin granddaughters this morning. City Mgr. Berlin called attention to the meeting with the Electrical Board, which has been set for 7:30 Wednesday evening, to discuss recent issues regarding staff. He also advised that the staff is contacting other communities re suggestions on Standard Metropolitan Statistical Area (SMSA) procedures. City Atty. Hayek reported that regarding the article in the Daily Iowan re access by Council candidates to residence halls, that there is a policy voted on by the students to not allow soliciting door-to-door in the dorms. The decision of the Baculis Trailer Court matter was discussed, Hayek asked if it was Council's wish that fie investigate. Council did not direct him I so. to do Moved by Balmer, seconded by Roberts, to adopt RES. 79-497, Bk. 59, pp. 1293-1296, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO SIGN AN EASEMENT RELEASE FOR AN EXISTING SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT ACROSS LOT 4 EASTDALE MALL AND DIRECTING CITY :THE CLERK TO RECORD A NEW SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT ACROSS LOT 4 EASTOALE MALL. Affirmative roll call vote unanimous, 6/0, Perrot absent. Moved by Roberts, seconded by Neuhauser, to adopt RES. 79-498, Bk. 59, p. 1297, ACCEPTING THE REALIGNED SANITARY SEWER ON LOT 4 EASTDALE MALL. f Affirmative roll call vote unanimous, 6/0, Perrot absent. 1� MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB i I CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 1401MES I r. �.. Council Activities Octobe6 1979 Page 3 Moved by Balmer, seconded by deProsse, to adopt RES. 79-4911 Bk. 59, pp. 1298-1299, ESTABLISHING JUST COMPENSATION FOR ACQUISITION OF REAL PROPERTY FOR THE SOUTH BRANCH RALSTON CREEK STORMWATER DETENTION PROJECT. Affirmative roll call vote unanimous, 6/0, Perrot absent. Moved by Balmer, seconded by Neuhauser, to adopt RES. 79-500, Bk. 59, pp. 1300-1302, AUTHORIZING RENEWAL OF A CONTRACT FOR IN -BUS ADVERTISING WITH ADS ADVERTISING. Affirmative roll call vote unanimous, 6/0, Perrot absent. Moved by Balmer, seconded by Neuhauser, to adjourn the meeting, 8:10 P.M. Motion carried unanimously, 6/0, Perrot absent. Vn ATTEST: I L MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES I401NES City of Iowa Cif �- MEMORANDUM DATE: October 12, 1979 TO: City Council FROM: City Manager RE: Material in Friday's Packet Memorandum from the City Manager regarding housing code. Memorandum from the Director of Housing and Inspection Services regard rezoning of future public housing sites. Memorandum from the Broadband Telecommunications Specialist regarding cable update. Memorandum from the City Attorney regarding proposed rental of office s Memoranda from the Department of Public Works: a. Discussion date for Block 64 Parking Garage b. Bus route changes Letter from the University of Kansas expressing compliments regarding t downtown pedestrian mall. Correspondence from the U.S. Department Of Commerce to the Regional Plai Commission regarding SMSA status. Correspondence from IDOT to the Regional Planning Commission regarding SMSA status. Memoranda from the Regional Planning Commission: a. Suggestions concerning future planning programs, problems and n b. Agency information - Update on remainder of budget hearing sche Brochure regarding Community Technology Initiatives Program Articles: a. "Let's Get Rid of 'The Girl"' b. "The Hawkeye Pride - Iowa City Transit System" C• "Vying for Viewers" - The Building Line, October 1979 Memo from Parks and Rec. Director re Cemetary wall. Agenda of Properties and tour information for Council House Violation tour. Material distributed by Protective Assn. of Tenants re house violations. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOINES IOWA CITY CITY COUNCIL AGENDA RE(IJWR ODUNCIL MEETING OF OCTOBER 16, 1979 7:30 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CIVIC CENTER 410 EAST 4ASHINGION ttICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES ■ i i i i I I i I i i i j f J i . i i j i i I, f i I t I IOWA CITY CITY COUNCIL AGENDA RE(IJWR ODUNCIL MEETING OF OCTOBER 16, 1979 7:30 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CIVIC CENTER 410 EAST 4ASHINGION ttICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES ■ AGENDA REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OCTOBER 16, 1979 Item No. 1 - MEETING TO ORDER. G(cy ✓��e RDLL CALL. 6-4-4tCOSiwi Item No. 2 - MAYOR'S PROCZAMATIONS. a. WSUI Day, October 20, 1979. b. White Cane Safety Day, October 15, 1979. Item No. 3 - CONSIDER ADOPTION OF THE CONSENT CALENDAR AS PRESENTED OR AMENDED. a. Approval of Official Actions of regular Council meeting of October 2, 1979, subject to Correction, as recommended by the City Clerk. b. Minutes of Boards and Commissions. (1) Committee on Community Needs meeting of October 3, 1979. (2) Riverfront Cannission meeting of October 3, 1979. (3) Senior Center Commission meeting of September 19, 1979. (4) Senior Center Commission meeting of September 26, 1979. (5) Housing Appeals Board meeting of September 27, 1979. (6) Airport Commission meeting of September 20, 1979. (7) Airport Commission meeting of September 27, 1979. (9) Parks and Recreation Commission meeting of September 12, 1979. (9) Civil Service Commission meeting of September 22, 1979. (10) Human Rights Commission meeting of September 4, 1979. (11) Board of Library Trustees meeting of September 27, 1979. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MONIES a Agenda Regular Council Mrr!tirxl Septrmbnr 7.5, 1979 7:.30 P.M. Page 2 C. Permit Resolutions, as recmrlended by City Clerk: (1) Consider resolution approving Class C Liquor for Ask Co., 7 dba Felix and Oscars, 5 S. Dubuque Street. (new) (2) Consider resolution approving Class C Liquor Sunday Sales Permit for Ask Co. dba Felix and Oscars, 5 S. Dubuque Street. (new) (3) Consider resolution approving a refund for Class C Liquor License. d. Correspondence. (1) Letter from Iowa DOT regarding I-80 lighting conversion. No reply is necessary. (2) Letter from Chairman, Airport Cortmission, requesting ap- propriation of additional funds for FY80. The City Manager will reply after Council has discussed this matter. e. Applications for the use of streets and public grounds. (1) Application from University of Iowa Homecoming Council to have a street dance on October 19, 1979. (denied) R A I/� „ /7 . I - 6, r, END OF CONSENT CALENDAR. Item No. 4 - PLANNING AND ZONING MATTERS. a. Consider a reconmrendation of the Planning and Zoning Cormission to the City Council to adopt the Ralston Creek Watershed Manage- ment Plan. Camment: The Planning and Zoning Commission, at a regular meeting held on October 4, 1979, recamrended by a 4-0 vote that the Ralston Creek Watershed Management Plan was consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and recavmended its adoption by the City Council. Action: a nrY n(Pn n r /' /iii O y�11) MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES iI0111E5 Agenda Regular Council Meeting h September 25, 1979 7:30 P.M. Page 3 Item No. 5 - PUBLIC DISCUSSION. 9 m MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOVIES t L u 1 Item No. 6 - PUBLIC HEARING ON THE ASSESSMENT OF THE COSTS OF WEED/GRASS CONl'fdOL. Comment: This hearing is being held to receive comments concerning two areas unmowel by Property owners which were mmoed by City contract. The costs are now ready to be given to the County Auditor for collection as regular taxes. A list of the properties involved is attached to i the agenda. Action: Item No. 7 - CONSIDER A RESOLUTION CERTIFYING DELINQUENT WEED CONTROL CHARGES TO G COUNTY AUDITOR. Cement: After the public hearing, the City Council is requested to approve the resolutions to certify charges to the County Auditor. Action' I L�the : IL rI Yi c [� ` cLP� n 1 n m (? i- "t Item NO. 8 - ANNOUNCEMENT OF VACANCIES. a. Board of Appeals - two vacancies for three-year terns expiring December 31, 1982. (This includes John Penick's term which will expire December 31, 1979, and the term formerly held by Burton Frantz which has been vacant over a year.) These appointments will be made at the November 27, 1979 meeting of the City Council, Iter No. 9 - CITY COUNCIL APPOINTMENTS. a. Consider approving recommendation of the Iowa City Board of Education that Mr. Bill Kidwell be appointed as the Board's on the Mayor's Youth Employment Board./� Action: �representative /� d!Al%GL l 2, 1- .P L.,� �.. — a....... 0.... I //:il!/__ m MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOVIES ' ..�tw— � CtiRrlLfiiwO p C�U�IIOGD F.�./•� N-�. �"-�L Z[.`1i-�cC.t,. oCrrri,P �uxL L(ygQ, R- QGs...e.-,�c2, ll //' ljqw �� `��-QGVIi� -�/-� • �^'/ ^fid='U�URQW1 i se sLVA L- ✓e�tLc` MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIOS•DF.S MOINES a , bcj -dr a4r V*_4 7,e-� 7-74K (:5Z� V,14 r L�� 7+Ldtw MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 140114ES Agenda Regular Council Meeting September 25, 1979 7:30 P.M. Page 4 Item No. 10 - CITY COUNCIL INFORMATION. item No. 11 - REPORT ON ITEMS FROM THE CITY MANAGER AND CITY ATTORNEY. a. City Manager. a� A. O CIA,C�CI b. City Attorney. -T. Alf—[ Cts- z, Ja eti hM A�� .A �'W.(iCLRJ W4 A.Q JLn.I-Yl ✓� �j �p� Iw.LI.�� • Item No. 12 - CONSIDER RESOL[71'ION AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO SIGN AN EASEMENT RELEASE �I FDR AN EXISTING SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT ACROSS LOT 4 EASTDALE MALL AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO RECORD A NEW SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT ACROSS LOT 4 EASTDALE MALL. Comment: This easement revision is necessary to allow construction of a proposed commercial building on Lot 4 Eastdale Mall. The relocated sanitary sewer serves three/lots within Eastdale Mall subdivision. Dthe f Ze Action: 49Zf2 I r I PIICROFILMED BY " JORM MICROLAB - CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 110IRES f 0 ,moo•-e.� --��- a / 17S _ c � 4L �• 1 p,L�,,..L�T -_I��% , .eGt, IQGr.�(.e ✓�X�C /��-��'���", ,.-x.. �.M.i^a� I MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES ■ a . ------ Agenda .L Agenda Regular Council Meeting September 25, 1979 7:30 P.M. Page 5 Iten No. 13 - CONSIDER RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE REALIGNED SANITARY SEWER ON LOT 4 j G(. EASTDALE MALL. Comment: This sanitary sewer was installed by Knowling Brothers of Iowa City, and was placed in the proposed easement on Lot 4 Eastdale Mall. Action: Item No. 14 - CONSIDER RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING JUST COMPENSATION FOR ACQUISITION OF 1q REAL PROPERTY FOR THE SOUTH BRANCH RALSTON CREEK STOR WATER DETENTION PROJECT. Camment: Pursuant to Council Resolution No. 79-99, adopted on March 6, 1979, the Development Division has initiated land acquisition procedures for the South Branch Ralston Creek Stormwater Detention Project. To date, this has included obtaining appraisals and review appraisals on the four project parcels and sending preliminary acquisition notices to the property owners. Federal regulations require that the City, prior to the actual initiation of negotiations with the property owners, establish the amounts it believes to be the just compensation for the real property interests to be acquired. This resolution accomplishes this purpose and authorizes the City staff to commence negotiations for the purpose of the necessary real property interests. Action: Item No. 15 - CONSIDER A RESOLUTION AUTIIORIZING RENEWAL OF A CONTRACT FOR IN -BUS 7 ()6 ADVERTISING WITH ADS ADVERTISING. Comment: Having satisfactorily completed 3 months of a previous advertiser's contract, this resolution will authorize renewal of a one year contract with Ads Advertising, allowing the following additions: (1) No political advertising will be accepted. (2) The City may use any advertising spot not used by Ads Adver- tising. (3) Contracts with individual advertisers will not be terminated in Q case iof� contract %termination with Ads Advertising. Action: Iten No. 16 - ADJOURNMENT. EIICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES I40111ES .. CITY OF IOWA CITY CIVIC CENTER 410 E. WASHINGTON ST IOWA CITY IOWA 52240 (3191354.180 P R O C L A M A T I O N WHEREAS, radio broadcasting is an essential service in creat- ing public awareness to constantly changing situations in the community, the state, the nation and the world, and WHEREAS, public radio station WSUI of the University of Iowa has endeavored to provide all listeners with programs designed to inform, educate and entertain, and WHEREAS, WSUI has been a vital part of Iowa City and Eastern Iowa for sixty years, NOW, THEREFORE, I, Robert A. VeveAa, MayoA o6 the City o6 Iowa City, phoctaim Satuaday, Oc,tobeA 20, 1979, as WSUI DAY, and cat upon att peopte to note the AecoAd o6 achievement o6 Aadio 6tation WSUI, it6 peuonnet, and .it6 anniveuany theme: "CAy6tat Seta t0 SateZ.Uted: Sixty YeaA6 o6 Fine Tuning" Signed in Iowa City, low, th.i.6 16th day o6 OatobeA 1979. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 140111ES 1934 _ l CITY OF IOWA CITY CIVIC CLNfLP ill(.) I WN;IIINI .II If\l .';I h WA ( IN h)WA (31A;i!A 18)( 0) PRUCLAIfAT I O N WHEREAS, Monday, October 15, is designated by State law as White Cane Safety Day in Iowa, and WHEREAS, the 1979 Code of Iowa provides that every blind citizen has the right to carry the white cane which demonstrates and symbolizes the ability to achieve a full and inde- pendent life and the capacity to work productively in competitive employment, and WHEREAS, Iowa law also provides that every operator of a motor vehicle who encounters a blind pedestrian is required to exercise appropriate caution to avoid accident or injury, and WHEREAS, both State and Federal laws prohibit discrimination based on blindness and support equal opportunity and affirmative action programs to encourage employment of blind persons in the competitive labor force, NOW, THEREFORE, I, RobW A. VeveAa, Alayoa o6 the City o6 Iowa City, do heAeby paocta,im Monday, OetobeA 15, 1979, a,6 WHITE CANE SAFETY DAY in Iowa City and catt upon ouA citi.zen6 to necogn,ize .the .indiv.iduat worth and ptoduetive tatenfi6 o6 ouh Uind neighbou and obseAve .the taw6 appUcabte .to .theiA uee o6 ou4 6ttAeet6, t.idewatz6, htghmy6 and public 6acf.CGtie6. S ,gned .in lona City, Iowa, th46 15th day 06 OctobeA 1979. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES I4011jES 1937 _.. COUNCIL INFORMAL DISCUSSION SEPTEMBER 24, 1979 INFORMAL COUNCIL DISCUSSION: September 24, 1979, 1:30 P.M. in the Council Chambers at the Civic Center. Mayor Robert Vevera presiding. COUNCILMEMBERS PRESENT: Balmer, Neuhauser, Perret, Vevera, Roberts, deProsse. Absent: Erdahl. STAFFMEMBERS PRESENT: Berlin, Stolfus. Others present for certain discussions as noted. TAPE-RECORDED: Reel #79-25, Side 1, 1720 -End, & Side 2, 1-900. APPLICATIONS TO PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Boothroy present. Courtcott Blvd. VII Legal papers need to be submitted, will Ui"_;e ror next week. Daves First Subdivision P&Z noted several contingencies. Council will nee to make a recommendation to Coralville. Council discussed access to the one lot. No dedication for future right-of-way has been given. The City will not have any jurisdiction until the area is annexed. Dale Sanderson was present representing Woods. P&Z will accept the drainage o.f.storm water to the river. Council can approve subject to specific contingencies. AGENDA AND COUNCIL BUSINESS 1. Balmer noted that the minutes of the Human Relations Commission. were worthless when submitted so late. 2. Balmer commented that the memo from the City Mgr. on Housing Code Enforcement and the letter from Iva Hillman raise several good points. Roberts noted the problem at 614 E. Jefferson re smoke detector. 3. Berlin advised that the Item N16, Res. of Agreement with City & Library was incorrect, and asked deferral of the item. 4. Berlin called attention to the memo from Plastino, asking for deferral: of the award of bid for a week on the Block 64 Parking Facility. 5. City Manager Berlin called attention to the request from the Housing Appeals Board for an interpretation. He noted that the first sentence in the Code says that the Housing Appeals Board interprets the Code. They could recommend a change in the ordinance.- Bob Johnson, Mgr., Town & Campus Apts. appeared re storm windows. It was suggested that the Resources Conser- vation Comm. work with Tinklenberg's information & work with the Appeals Board. 6. Mayor Vevera asked if there was any interest in becoming a sister City to Cazon City, Phillipines. He had advised them that he did not want to incur any expense that taxpayers would pay. 7. Vevera pointed out that a yield sign had been put up for traffic at Lucas/Bloomington intersection, Sept. 14th. There have been 8 accidents there in 1979. A majority of Councilmembers thought that a stop sign should be installed, with signs stopping traffic on Lucas. Berlin advised that he would so notify the Traffic Engr.. 8. Perret questioned when the questionnaires would be available for comments on the bus system. The maps are out. Berlin will check. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAP IDS- DES III) ImES 1720-1800 1800-2230 Informal Council Sept. 24, 1979 Page 2 9. deProsse requested that discussion of the Ralston Creek watershed plan be scheduled for informal discussion soon. of installation of fence at Melrose Ct. 10. Council discussed results barrier for Wright. Balmer called attention to Plastino's memo re motorcycles. No one favored allowing them access. HOUSING - PUBLIC fi0U5[PIG SITES Seydel, Kucharzak 55t_ is Baring had been postponed, and called 2230-Enid Ber in advised t epub the distributed by Seydel. He advised that the attention to memo Council would not be making any decisions today. Seydel discussed �id4702, sites for public housing listed in the memo, privately owned a parcels and city owned sites, analyzed each site and made William White Blvd. sites were discussed, with recommendation. Dr. Eckstein present. Berlin stated that it seemed to be the further with these consensus of the Council to not proceed any The of selling city-owned sites to three sites. possibility adjoining property owners was discussed. Council agreed that to adjacent vacated Virginia St. should be appraised and sold property owners, retaining an easement. Mike Rittenmeyer appeared re Site D on vacated F. St. Council- Staff to with appraisal. members will view the site. proceed This property was previously offered to adjacent property owners. in Resident of 436 Grant Court appeared regarding designation He noted that Ralston Creek plan. Berlin will check further. to comply with the requirements in HUD it would be impossible letter. Appraisal will be obtained for possible sale. Seydel advised that 5th Ave. North of F St. had not been vacated, and There there had been no input from the neighbors to his letter. HUD. were no objections to his submitting the site to HOUSING REHAB UPDATE Kucharzak, Steinbach, Siders item on the informal agenda, 470-810 It was pointed out that if there was an Council wanted some written material available to them beforehand. Kucharzak reviewed progress of the project, and discussed the Community Needs. Because recommendations from the Committee on he like to consider only applications from of limited funds, would the elderly. The present status of the program and workload were '312' explained. outlined. The use of the Federal program was St. Cooperative loan was discussed, also for The multi-family Summit the rental-occupied Iowa Ave. Apts. Requirement of HUD agreement for rental regulatory agreements was noted. Neuhauser commented the best, and economical, that cities have found the 312 program and do not want Fed. funding cut. Kucharzak requested program, that the Rehab Advisory Committee be reactivated. As Council has not voted this committee out, they could start meeting again. PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR BOAT RAMP Kraft, Milkman, Comm. Gilpin & Howard. & 810-890 Riverfront Come. has discussed agreement with Airport Comm. will is angled, site is across from have it soon. Access to the river the old red-brick hangar on Highway 218 South. Parking for 20 cars & trailers, cost $30,000 for project. Liability would be assumed is their Berlin stated. Consensus of by the City, as it project, the Council was to proceed. APPOINTMENT TO RESOURCES CONSERVATION COMM.-COMMITTEE ON COMMUNITY NEEDS 890-900 Bar er, nanimous ecision o appoin is ae Inger-RCC. Pecina, Meeting adjourned 3:50 PM. Bonney & Haldeman to CCN, unanimous. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -US 1101m[S INFORMAL COUNCIL DISCUSSION OCTOBER 1, 1979 INFORMAL COUNCIL DISCUSSION: October 1, 1979, 1:30 P.M. in the Conference Room at the Civic Center. Mayor Robert Vevera presiding. COUNCILMEMBERS PRESENT: Balmer, Roberts, Erdahl, Vevera, Perret, Neuhauser, deProsse. Absent: None. STAFFMEMBERS PRESENT: Berlin, Stolfus, Helling. Others present for certain discussions, as noted. TAPE-RECORDED: Reel H79-25, Side 2, 900 -End. APPLICATIONS TO PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Boothroy present 900-1560 Court Hill -Scott Blvd. Part VII Legal papers & plat have been revise . greement for etention basin distributed to Council. Lot 106 is detention basin, assigned to Lot 107. Item 4.b will be two resolutions, if Ord. approving PAD is adopted. PAD -T 'n Cae, Parts 1 & 2 Instead of item 4.c on agenda, Council will need to set a public hearing on October 23rd. Agenda as posted will be reposted. Balmer expressed concern, agreed to by other Council - members, as to how well Home Owner's Associations work. Boothroy advised that, in this PAD there are no common open spaces, each building will maintain an area. This PAD complies with the treeDlantina Dlan. Southway Park ( N Area) Developer has asked for special consideration. Lega op pr note re capacity of sewer lift station & recommendation from Legal & Engr. Dept. that it is o.k, to tap into sewer. City Mgr. Berlin will check to make sure BDI approves this plan, & uses. AGENDA AND'COUNCILTIME 1560-2090 1. e rosse ca a attention to re -opening of Woodfields. Attys. Ryan & Scholten present recommending any litigation be discussed in executive session. Stolfus noted that executive session could be held after 10/2 regular meeting. Notice will be posted on the bulletin board. 2. Stolfus requested addition of consideration of Class C Beer Permit for Quik Trip on W. Benton, to the Consent Calendar. 3. Neuhauser requested that the matter concerning zoning on Beldon Ave., letter from City Atty. Hayek noted, letter from Sherinian noted. City Mgr. will tell Sherinian that under the Ordinances, the avenue of appeal is thru the Board of Adjustment. No Council objections. 4. Regarding Melrose Avenue Sewer Extension project, Ryan memo noted. Property owners to be notified of informal discussion scheduled for next Monday, to discuss sidewalk & other objections. 5. Balmer called attention to the memo re Spruce St. water drainage problem. Residents will be invited to informal discussion Monday. 6. Neuhauser commented on use of criteria from Nat. Traffic Manual for installation of signs. Berlin noted that they should be used, but other factors may be used by Council & City Manager to make a decision. Traffic signals at several sites will be discussed at Council's goals session. 7. Collection of small rock at edges of streets that were chip -sealed was discussed. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CCDAR RAPIDS -DES w01nES Page 2 Informal Council October 1, 1979 8. Neuhasuer called attention to problem in North Dodge area with barking dogs, and sewer connection assessment. Berlin will check complaints. She also noted that the catch -basin at Highwood & Lee Sts. needs to be cleaned, someone is stuffing newspaper in it. 9. Berlin questioned if any of the four Council incumbents were going to attend the Council Candidates meeting on Oct. 3rd. None will attend. 10. Perret questioned why the cards to be distributed for comments on bus service were not ready. Berlin explained that Mose wanted the new system to be in operation for awhile. All complaints and alternatives are being checked. HUMAN SERVICES BUDGET FORMS 2090-2560 Johnson County Regional Planning Human Services Planner Pam Ramser noted that no Council representatives had attended the last two funding sessions with United Way. If a Council person who is scheduled has problems in attending the session scheduled for, someone else should be contacted to replace him/her. Ramser went thru the Budget Form, Funding Request Summary Sheet (which will be sent to Council on a regular basis for all the agencies). She also distributed Instruction Manual & Questionnaire for Agencies. Berlin advised that scheduling could be improved so that each agency would appear only when they are considering funding for a request. Council on Aging is the only budget not submitted. Ramser was complimented on the improvements made over last year's budget forms & requests. SOUTH GILBERT ST. RELOCATION PROJECT STATUS REPORT 2560-2838 City Mgr. Berlin stated that a t o some progress has been made on property acquistion, Staff is not ready to recommend proceeding with the Res. Awarding the Contract to Metro Pavers, who have agreed to sit,on their bid. Other concerns re Country Kitchen (Braverman/Meardon) were noted. Council noted their appreciation of what Metro Pavers is doing, and agreed that if there are too many problems, Council could decide that they would not continue with the project. An item will be added to the agenda, to defer consideration to Oct. 2nd. and will be so posted on the bulletin board. APPOINTMENTS TO THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT AND THE LIBRARY BOARD OF TRUSTEES 2838 -End agreed to appoint Carolyn Cavitt to the Library Board. EXECUTIVE SESSION 3:30 P.M. Conference Room Moved y deProsse, seconded by Roberts to adjourn to executive session to discuss the summary of negotiation procedures of the pre -settlement conditions for the City of Iowa City for fiscal year 1981 (Fire Dept.). Affirmative roll call vote unanimous, 7/0, all Councilmembers present. Staff present: Berlin, Stolfus, Helling, Brown. Brown presented the proposal for the Fire Dept., and discussed the city's counter proposal. Moved by Roberts, seconded by deProsse to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously, 7/0. Taped on Reel H15, Side 1, 700-1540. 4:30 P.M. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MDnIES COMPLETE DESCRIPTION OF COUNCIL ACTIVITIES October 2, 1979 Iowa City Council, reg. mtg., 10/2/79, 7:30 P.M. at the Civic Center. Mayor Vevera presiding. Councilmembers present: Balmer, deProsse, Erdahl, Neuhauser, Perret, Roberts, Vevera. Absent: none. Staffinembers present: Berlin, Helling, Hayek, Schmeiser, Siders, Kucharzak, Stolfus, Karr. Council minutes tape recorded on Tape 79-24, Side 2, 1-685. Mayor Vevera proclaimed October 1979 as American Heart Month; the week of October 7-13 as Employ the Handicapped Week; October 1979 as Salute Industry Month; and October 7, 1979 as Firefighter's Memorial Sunday. City Clerk Stolfus requested addition of Res. of approval for Class C Beer Permit for Quik Trip, West Benton, to the Consent Calendar. Moved by Perret, seconded by Erdahl, that the following items and recommendations in the Consent Calendar be received, or approved, and/or adopted, as amended: Approval of Official Actions, reg. Council mtgs., 9/11/79 and 9/18/79, subject to correction, as recommended by the City Clerk. Minutes of Boards and Commissions: Planning & Zoning Comm. - 9/20/79; Riverfront Comm. -9/19/79; Design Review Comm. -9/19/79; Library Bd. of Trustees -9/11/79; Broadband Telecommunications - 9/18/79. Permit Resolutions, Book 59, as recommended by City Clerk: RES. 79-465, p. 1239, APPROVING CLASS B BEER PERMIT FOR T. I. INVESTMENTS, INC. dba GODFATHER'S PIZZA, 531 Highway 1 West. RES. 79-466, p. 1240, APPROVING CLASS C BEER PERMIT FOR DALE E. WATT dba WATT'S FOOD MARKET, 1603 Muscatine Avenue. RES. 79-467, p. 1241, REFUND A PORTION OF CLASS C LIQUOR LICENSE FEE FOR KENNETH O'DONNELL dba LAMPLIGHTER II, 1310 Highland Ct. RES. 79-468, p. 1242, APPROVING CLASS C LIQUOR LICENSE FOR BAUM & RICE dba CLUB CAR 'LOUNGE, 122 Wright St. RES. 79-469, p. 1242, APPROVING CIGARETTE PERMITS. RES. 79-470, p. 1244, APPROVING CLASS C BEER PERMIT FOR QUIK TRIP CORPORATION dba QUIK TRIP #503, 123 West Benton St. Setting Public Hearings: Public hearing was set for 10/16/79 on the assessment of the costs of weed/grass control. RES. 79-471, Bk. 59, p. 1245, SETTING PUBLIC HEARING ON 10/9/79 FOR NEIGHBORHOOD SITE IMPROVEMENTS - SIDEWALK REPAIR PROGRAM. Correspondence: Letter from Clara Harrison re access problem to Blackstone Beauty Salon, referred to City Manager for reply. le;r-. .. . . --- I II1CROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES IIOIIIES Cc ^ it Activities Octuber 2, 1979 Page 2 Mayor Vevera repeated the public hearings as set. Affirmative roll call vote unanimous, 7/0, all Councilmembers present. Moved by Balmer, seconded by Neuhauser, that ORDINANCE 79-2974, Bk. 15, pp. 133-134, APPROVING THE FINAL PAD PLAN OF COURT HILL -SCOTT BOULEVARD, PART VII. be passed and adopted. Affirmative roll call vote unanimous, 7/0, all Councilmembers present. Moved by Balmer, seconded by Neuhauser, to adopt RES. 79-472, Bk. 59, pp. 1246-1247, APPROVING FINAL LARGE SCALE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT FOR COURT HILL -SCOTT BOULEVARD, PART VII. Affirmative roll call vote unanimous, 7/0, all Councilmembers present. Moved by Balmer, seconded by Neuhauser to adopt RES. 79-473, Bk. 59, pp. 1248-1249, APPROVING THE FINAL PLAT AND SUBDIVISION FOR COURT HILL -SCOTT BOULEVARD, PART VII. Affirmative roll call vote unanimous, 7/0, all Councilmembers present. As posted to the agenda, item 4(c) was changed to the following procedure. Moved by Neuhauser, seconded by Perret, to set a public hearing for 10/23/79 on consideration of ordinance amending final Planned Area Development plan of Ty'n Cae, Parts 1 & 2. Motion carried " unanimously, 7/0, all Councilmembers present. Moved by Balmer, seconded by Perret, to adopt RES. 79-474, Bk. 59, pp..1250-1251, APPROVING THE AMENDED LARGE SCALE NON-RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN OF SOUTHWAY PARK. Affirmative roll call vote unanimous, 7/0,.a11-Councilmembers present. Letter of approval from B.D.I. has been received. Moved by Perret, seconded by Neuhauser, that the ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CODE OF ORDINANCES BY ESTABLISHING SECTION 8.10.35.11.B.7, Sign Regulations, be considered and given second vote for passage. Motion to consider carried, 7/0. Affirmative roll call vote on second vote for passage unanimous, 7/0, all Councilmembers present. Donn Stanley, 511 S. Johnson, appeared requesting Council action regarding voter registration. Moved by Erdahl, seconded by Vevera, to urge citizens 18 years and older to register and to vote in the upcoming elections.. Motion carried unanimously, 7/0. Johnson Suchomel, 330' N. Lucas, agreed with action taken. Mayor Vevera advised that the appointment to the Board of Appeals to fill an unexpired term ending 12/31/80, and the appointment to the Board of Adjustment to fill an unexpired term ending 1/1/84 would be readvertised. Moved by deProsse, seconded by Perret, to appoint Carolyn Cavitt, 215 Teeters Court, to the Library Board of Trustees to fill an unexpired term ending 7/1/81. Motion carried unanimously, 7/0. Mayor Vevera commented that the Council wished that some of the many fine applicants who applied for the Library Board would apply for other boards and commissions. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES IIOINES J Icil Activities OL,ober 2, 1979 Page 3 City Mgr. Berlin stated that discussion of a left -turn signal for northbound traffic at Park Road Bridge would be scheduled later. City Atty. Hayek commented that regarding the Beldon Ave. housing issue, Kucharzak wants to review the problem, and Staff will report back to Council. The interested persons will be so notified. Roberts reported that last summer Council made the right decision in not doing the Ventura/Tanglewood paving project, as improvements have been made and the street & area look good. Neuhauser called attention to a complaint that a patch of asphalt was made on a brick street at Church/Dubuque. Berlin will investigate. Regarding recent action taken by the Airport Commission, a motion was made by Neuhauser, seconded by Perret, and after discussion, amended to read as follows: Moved that the City Council urge the Airport Commission not to have the airport planning consultant recommend and evaluate alternative sites for an airport. After further discussion, Perret called for the question. Motion adopted 6/1: Roberts voting no. Balmer requested a report from Public Works comparing chip -seal process with asphalt process with regard to cost and life of repair. City Mgr. Berlin advised that after his meeting with Kucharzak and Steinbach, a tour will be scheduled for Council to view specific problems regarding housing code enforcement. He announced that the Environmental Protection Agency had approved the River Corridor Sewer Project contract today. The contractor is deciding which areas can be worked on yet this fall. Madison St. will probably be unuseable for a year. The Resolution awarding the Bid for the South Gilbert Street Project had been deferred to the 10/2 meeting, and the City Manager advised that the Resolution should be deferred for another three weeks. Moved by Roberts, seconded by Balmer to defer the Resolution for three weeks (Oct. 23). Motion carried unanimously, 7/0. Mayor Vevera questioned the legality of holding an executive session after the formal meeting, for discussion of pending litigation/Woodfields. Atty. Hayek stated that there is both pending and threatened litigation, and discussion of strategy would be a detriment to the City's interest, and that is a legitimate reason to hold an executive session. Moved by Perret, seconded by Neuhauser, to adopt RES. 79-475, Bk. 59, pp. 1252-1257, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO SIGN AND THE CITY CLERK TO ATTEST AN AGREEMENT WITH JOHNSON COUNTY AND A BETTER CAB COMPANY TO PROVIDE SUBSIDIZED CAB SERVICE for elderly and handicapped. Affirmative roll call vote unanimous, 7/0, all Councilmembers present. Moved by Neuhauser, seconded by Perret, to adopt RES. 79-476, Bk. 59, p. 1258, APPROVING AMENDMENTS TO THE FY80 BUDGET. Affirmative roll call vote unanimous, 7/0, all Councilmembers present. Moved by Balmer, seconded by Neuhauser, to adopt RES. 79-477, Bk. 59, p. 1259, AWARDING ALLEY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, BLOCK 28 AND 29, MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•D[s I10111CS CI^:il Activities Octuber 2, 1979 Page 4 O.T., 1979, to Metro Pavers of Iowa City in amount of $23,808.41. Affirmative roil call vote unaimous, 7/0, all Councilmembers present. Moved by Perret, seconded by Erdahl, to adopt RES. 79-478, Bk. 59, p. 1260, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR CURB RAMP PROGRAM, 1979, to Streb Construction in the amount of $48,423.60. Affirmative roll call vote unanimous, 7/0, all Councilmembers present. Moved by Balmer, seconded by Neuhauser, to adopt RES. 79-479, Bk. 59, p. 1261, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR NEIGHBORHOOD SITE IMPROVEMENTS - ASPHALT OVERLAY PROGRAM, to L. L. Pelling Company in the amount of $28,738.95. Affirmative roll call vote unanimous, 7/0, all Councilmembers present. Moved by Roberts, seconded by Balmer, to adopt RES. 79-480, Bk. 59, p. 1262, AMENDING THE CLASSIFICATION PLAN FOR CLASSIFIED PERSONNEL BY RECLASSIFYING A POSITION IN THE POLICE DEPARTMENT (FORT). deProsse advised that she would abstain as it should be an administrative matter. Council discussed Charter provisions and past procedure for reclassifications. Moved by deProsse, seconded by Erdahl that the Resolution be tabled. Motion not adopted, 3/4, Neuhauser, Roberts, Balmer & Vevera voting 'no'. Roll call vote on motion to adopt RES. 79-480, 4/2, Ayes:: Roberts, :Vevera, Balmer, Neuhauser, Mays: Erdahl, Perret. Abstain: deProsse. Neuhauser questioned if permanent reclassifications could revert to temporary. City Mgr. Berlin will report back. Moved by Perret, seconded by deProsse, to adopt RES. 79-481, Bk. 59, pp. 1263-1264, AUTHORIZING JOINT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE IOWA CITY LIBRARY BOARD OF TRUSTEES AND THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF IOWA CITY TO COORDINATE NEGOTIATING PROCEDURES FOR PURPOSES 'OF COLLECTIVE BARGAINING. Affirmative roll call vote unanimous, 7/0, all Councilmembers present. Moved by Balmer, seconded by Neuhauser, to adjourn to executive session for the purpose of discussion of strategy in matters presently in litigation, specifically the City's pending lawsuit against Woodfields, or where litigations is imminent, which would include damage claim already filed against the City by Woodfields, where its disclosure would disadvantage or would be likely to prejudice the position of the governmental body in that litigation. Affirmative roll call vote unanimous, 7/0, all Councilmembers present. City Atty. Hayek stated that his opinion was that executive session for those purposes may be held. Meeting adjourned, 8:40 P.M. ATTEST: MAYOR CITY CLERK MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDs•DCs !m uiEs MINUTES OF OFFICIAL ACTIONS OF COUNCIL - 10/2/79 The cost of publishing the following Proceed- ings & claims is $ Cumulative cost for this calendar year for said publication is Iowa City Council, reg, mtg., 10/2/79 7:30 P.M. at the Civic Center. Mayor Vevera presiding. Councilmembers present: Balmer, deProsse, Erdahl, Neuhauser, Perret, Roberts, Vevera. Absent: none. Mayor Vevera proclaimed October 1979 as American Heart Month; the week of October 7-13 as Employ the Handicapped Week; October 1979 as Salute Industry Month; and October 7 1979 as Firefighter's Memorial Sunday. City Clerk Stolfus requested addition of Res. of approval.for Class C Beer Permit for Quik Trip, West Benton, to the Consent Calendar. Moved by Perret, seconded by Erdahl, that the following items and recommendations in the Consent Calendar be received, or approved, and/or adopted, as amended: oval Of al Actions. Council Pmtgs., 9/11/79 and �9/18/79, subject to correction, as recommended by the City Clerk. Minutes of Boards and Commissions: Planning & Zoning Comm.-9/20/79; Riverfront Comm.-9/19/79; Design Review Comm.-9/19/79; Library Bd. of Trustees-9/11/79; Broadband Telecommunications-9/18/79. Permit Resolutions, Book 59, as recommended by City Clerk: RES. 79-465, P. 1239, APPROVING CLASS B BEER PERMIT FOR T. I.,:INVESTMENTS$ INC. dba:. GODFATHER'S PIZZA, 531 Highway l West. RES. 79-466, p. 1240, APPROVING CLASS C BEER PERMIT FOR WATT'S FOOD MARKET, 1603 Muscatine Avenue. RES. 79-467, P. 1241, REFUND A PORTION OF CLASS C LIQUOR LICENSE FEE FOR KENNETH O'DONNELL dba LAMPLIGHTER II, 1310 Highland Ct. RES. 79- 468, p. 1242, APPROVING CLASS C LIQUOR LICENSE FOR BAUM & RICE dba CLUB CAR LOUNGE, 122 Wright St. RES. 79-469, P. 1242, APPROVING CIGARETTE 79-470 APPROVING CLASSICS BEERES. PERMIT FORS QUIK (TRIP #503, 123 West Benton St. Setting Public Hearings: Public hearing was set for 10/16/79 on the assessment of the costs of weed/grass control. RES. 79-471, Bk. 59, P. 1245, SETTING PUBLIC HEARING ON 10/9/79 FOR NEIGHBORHOOD SITE IMPROVEMENTS - SIDEWALK REPAIR PROGRAM. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 'IOIIIES Council Activities Correspondence: Letter from Clara October 2, 1979 Harrison re access problem to Blackstone Page 2 Beauty Salon, referred to City Manager for reply. Mayor Vevera repeated the public hearings as set. Affirmative roll call vote unanimous, 7/0, all Councilmembers present. Moved by Balmer, seconded by Neuhauser, that ORDINANCE 79-2974, Bk. 15, pp. 133-134, APPROVING THE FINAL PAD PLAN OF COURT HILL_ SCOTT BOULEVARD, PART VII. be passed and adopted. Affirmative roll call vote unanimous, 7/0, all Councilmembers present. Moved by Balmer, seconded by Neuhauser, to adopt RES. 79-472, Bk. 59, pp. 1246-1247, APPROVING FINAL LARGE SCALE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT FOR COURT HILL -SCOTT BOULEVARD, PART VII. Affirmative roll call vote unanimous, 7/0, all Councilmembers present. Moved by Balmer, seconded by Neuhauser to adopt RES. 79-473, Bk. 59, pp. 1248-1249, APPROVING THE FINAL PLAT AND SUBDIVISION FOR COURT HILL -SCOTT BOULEVARD, PART VII. Affirmative roll call vote unanimous, 7/0, all Councilmembers present. As posted to the agenda, item 4(c) was changed to the following procedure. Moved by Neuhauser, seconded by Perret, to set a public hearing for 10/23/79 on consideration of ordinance amending final Planned Area Development plan of Ty'n Cae, Parts 1 & 2. Motion carried unanimously, 7/0, all Councilmembers present. Moved by Balmer, seconded by Perret, to adapt RES. 79-474, Bk. 59, pp. 1250-1251, APPROVING THE AMENDED LARGE SCALE NON-RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN OF SOUTHWAY PARK. Affirmative roll call vote unanimous, 7/0, all Councilmembers present. Moved by Perret, seconded by Neuhauser, that the ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CODE OF ORDINANCES BY ESTABLISHING SECTION 8.10.35.11.8.7, Sign Regulations, be considered and given second vote for passage. Motion to consider carried, 7/0. Affirmative roll call vote on second vote for passage unanimous, 7/0, all Councilmembers present. Donn Stanley, 511 S.' Johnson, appeared requesting Council action regarding voter registration. Moved by Erdahl, seconded by Vevera, to urge citizens 18 years and older to register and to vote in the upcoming elections. Motion carried unanimously, 7/0. Johnson Suchomel, 330k N. Lucas, agreed with action taken. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB C,EOAR RAPIOS•OES 'dOIBES Council Activities Mayor Vevera advised that the appointment to October 2, 1979 the Board of Appeals Page 3 ending 12/31/80to fill an unexpired term , and the appointment to the Board of Adjustment to fill an unexpired term ending 1/1/84 would be readvertised. Moved by deProsse, seconded by Perret, to appoint Carolyn Cavitt, 215 Teeters Court, to the Library Board of Trustees to fill an unexpired term ending 7/1/81. Motion carried unanimously, 7/0. Regarding recent action taken by the Airport Commission, a motion was made by Neuhauser, seconded by Perret, and after discussion, amended to read as follows: Moved thatthe City Council urge the Airport Commission not to have the airport Planning consultant recommend and evaluate alternative sites for an airport. Motion adopted 6/1: Roberts voting no. City Mgr. Berlin announced that the Environmental Protection Agency had approved the River Corridor Sewer Project contract today. The Resolution awarding the Bid for the South Gilbert Street Project had been deferred to the 10/2 meeting, and the City Manager advised that the Resolution should be deferred for another three weeks. Moved by. Roberts, seconded by Balmer to defer the Resolution for three weeks (Oct. 23). Motion carried unanimously, 7/0. Moved by Perret, seconded by Neuhauser, to adopt RES. 79-475,' Bk. 59, PP. 1252-1257, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO SIGN AND THE CITY CLERK TO ATTEST- AN AGREEMENT— WITH JOHNSON COUNTY AND A BETTER CAB COMPANY TO PROVIDE SUBSIDIZED CAB SERVICE for elderly and handicapped. Affirmative roll call vote unanimous, 7/0, all Councilmembers present. Moved by Neuhauser, seconded by Perret, to adopt RES. 79-476, Bk. 59, P. 1258, APPROVING AMENDMENTS TO THE FY80 BUDGET. Affirmative roll call vote unanimous, 7/0, all Councilmembers Present. Moved by Balmer, seconded by Neuhauser, to adopt RES. 79-477, Bk. 59,,p, 1259, AWARDING ALLEY IMPROVEMENT.:.PROJECT, BLOCK 28 AND 29, O.T., 1979, to Metro Pavers of Iowa City in amount of $23,808.41. Affirmative roll call vote unaimous, 7/0, all Councilmembers present. Moved by Perret, seconded by Erdahl, to adopt RES. 79-478, Bk. 59' p, 1260, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR CURB RAMP PROGRAM, 1979, to Streb Construction in the amount of $48,423,60. Affirmative roll call vote unanimous, 7/0, all Councilmembers present. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDs•DE. n011JEs Council Activities Moved by Balmer, seconded by Neuhauser, to October 2, 1979 adopt RES. 79-479, Bk. 59, p. 1261, AWARDING Page 4 CONTRACT FOR NEIGHBORHOOD SITE IMPROVEMENTS - ASPHALT OVERLAY PROGRAM, to L. L. Pelling Company in the amount of $28,738.95. Affirmative roll call vote unanimous, 7/0, all Councilmembers present. Moved by Roberts, seconded by Balmer, to adopt RES. 79-480, Bk. 59, p. 1262, AMENDING THE CLASSIFICATION PLAN FOR CLASSIFIED PERSONNEL BY RECLASSIFYING A POSITION IN THE POLICE DEPARTMENT (FORT). Roll call vote on motion to adopt RES. 79- 480, 4/2, Ayes: Roberts, Vevera, Balmer, Neuhauser, Nays: Erdahl, Perret. Abstain: deProsse. Moved by Perret, seconded by deProsse, to adopt RES. 79-481, Bk. 59, pp. 1263-1264, AUTHORIZING JOINT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE IOWA CITY LIBRARY BOARD OF TRUSTEES AND THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY. OF._ IOWA CITY TO COORDINATE NEGOTIATING PROCEDURES FOR PURPOSES OF COLLECTIVE BARGAINING. Affirmative roll call vote unanimous, 7/0, all Councilmembers present. Moved by Balmer, seconded by Neuhauser, to adjourn to executive, session for the purpose of discussion of strategy. in matters presently in I litigation, specifically the City's pending lawsuit against Woodfields, or where litigations is imminent, which would include damage claim already filed against the City by Woodfields, where its disclosure would disadvantage or would be likely to prejudice the position of the governmental body in that litigation. Affirmative roll call vote unanimous, 7/0, all Councilmembers present. City Atty. Hayek stated that his opinion was that executive session for those purposes may be held. Meeting adjourned, 8:40 P.M. A more complete description of Council activities is on file in the office of the City Clerk. s/ROBERT A. VEVERA, MAYOR s/pBBI ESjOLFU$, CITY CLE�RKpSuQbm�iptt/e/d, on 10/8/79. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES uolrlEs COUNCIL MEETING OF ROUTING FOR ORDINANCES, RESOLUTIONS, AGREEMENTS, CONTRACTS, NOTICES. ORIGINAL ORIGINAL XEROX XEROX COPIES COPIES COPIES CONT. INSTRUCTION ,GENDA CERT. OF OF OF AFTER FOR TEM N FILE N RECR. ITEMS CONTRACT ITEMS EXECUTION FINALIZATION l e, 1- 3 7 '7 '— H97 1a4• /��Seef• keLV s.F'e Kecelde J" ✓ S�bd, Folder � t7v, t i %�ecoa�er.(wke ✓fy/�i �ecuen dare �e 1 FIe i �,.,,�.d-Su6d• A4pee-h folclev -) r�ea.0, 4, </`/.E44eef L1 tis V ,\PJ. r1 QIP � z u bci, Er%va p hers to S 64. Foldev ` 14 j ' I ; I PPD-cti,'0.} ✓ pO Fes. /1�/�jee-�,ky ✓�� ellevvia S.�oK�,rile 00-nl. 4dc.4d).. j 0-1evK'yCa,j, r I e l le ;(/ MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES RE9uLaR. Coumcit MEEt*IM9 Y: 30 P. M. ?kccLsc Sl9N IN: NamE: dd ess: 0*2 3, Al S. 13. J4. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOIRES . t- 3� MINUTES cOMMiTTEE ON COMMUNITY NEEDS OCTOBER 3, 1979 -- 12:00 NOON It1i(:ItIiA'I'ION (:IiN'1'1i12 -- Mii1i'I'IN(; ROOM It MEMBERS PRESENT: Swisher, Amidon, hall, Pocina, Bonney, Harker, Ilaldeman, Clark, McCormick, .Johnson, Barfuss MEMBERS ABSENT: Owens, Morton, Patrick STAFF PRESENT: Milkman, Wilkinson, Ilencin, Sandro, Knight, Keller, Meisel RECOM14ENDATIONS TO CITY COUNCIL: Neighborhood Site Improvement Projects: 1. That the alley running north -south between the Burlington Street -Muscatine Avenue intersection to the Court Street -Oakland Avenue intersection be made one-way going south. 2. That the Traffic Department continue to research the feasibility of a pedestrian cycle at the intersection of Highway G and Keokuk. 3. That neighborhood meetings be held in the North Side and hickory hill areas to re-evaluate the sidewalk repair program in these areas. SUMMARY OF DISCUSSION: Chairperson Swisher called the meeting, to order and welcomed the new members of the committee. Following introductions of everyone present, Swisher gave a brief explanation of CCN activities. A short discussion of the possibility of changing the meeting time and day followed. Johnson moved, and Amidon seconded, that the meeting time and day remain the same (12:00 noon on the first Wednesday of each month). Motion carried unanimously. It was pointed out that this information should be printed on the application forms for membership on the Committee. Swisher called for consideration of the minutes of the September 5, 1979, meeting. .Johnson moved, and McCormick seconded, that the minutes he approved as circulated. Motion carried unanimously. Update on Neighborhood Site Improvements Proiect and Curb Cut Proeram: Bruce Knight, Planner/Program Analyst, presented updates on the Neighborhood Site Improvements project and asked for specific recommendations from CCN on (1) the Special Alley Project, (2) the pedestrian cycle at the intersection of Ilighway G and Keokuk, and (3) the Sidewalk Repair Program. Knight explained that the Special Alley Project concerns the north -south alley which runs from the Burlington Street -Muscatine Avenue intersection to the Court Street -Oakland Avenue intersection. Ile further explained that the staff recommenda- tions would be to make this alley one-way leading south. The residents in the area concur with this recommendation. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOINES /?if Committee on Community Needs October 3, 1979 Page 2 .Johnson moved, and Barker seconded, that the alley running north -south between the Burlington Street -Muscatine Avenue intersection to the Court Street-Oakiand Avenue intersection be made one-way going south. Motion carried unanimously. Knight then explained the recommendation of the 'Traffic lingincer not to request a Pedestrian cycle at the Intersection of Highway G and Keokuk. After some discussion on this topic, Ilaldeman moved and McCormick seconded that the 'Traffic Department continue to research the feasibility of a Pedestrian cycle at the intersection of Ilighway G and Keokuk. Motion carried unanimously. The 1'inni item discussed by Knight was the Sidewalk Repair Program in the North Side I one Hickory Ili 11 wrens. Knight stated that the assessment programs requested by the residents were not feasible and that staff recommended repairing as many of the sidewalks as funds would permit in these areas. It was Pointed out that CCN had recommended at their May 30 meeting that any money remaining from the budgeted amounts on other projects in these areas be put into the Sidewalk Repair Program. McCormick suggested that residents in these two neighborhoods should be given another opportunity to decide what they wanted done in the neighborhood, because the original meetings were held two years ago. After some discussion of this topic, McCormick moved and Hall seconded that neighborhood meetings he held in the North Side and Hickory Hill areas to re-evaluate the Sidewalk Repair Program in these areas. Notion carried 10-I (Ilaldeman opposed). Barker asked what, if anything, could be done about the seats in some of the bus stop shelters. Silo said that she had heard some complaints that the scats were too low and that the elderly had problems getting up. Knight said that he would check with Hugh Mose, 'Transit Director, to see if anything could be done to remedy this situation. Swisher suggested that the Committee read through the Neighborhood Site Improvements Program Monthly Progress Report for September and ask any questions they might have at the next meeting, 'I'll's suggestion met with nPProvai from those attending, i Small Cities Project: i Milkman explained that the City Council had gone along with CCN's recommendation that residents of the Small Cities area be given the option of selling their property if the property was not required for the improvements. Silo also called attention to the neighborhood meeting that will be held Wednesday, October 17, at 7:30 p.m, in the National Guard Armory, Update on Senior Center Plans and Activities: Bette Meisel, Senior Center Coordinator, presented the plans for the Senior Center rind explained that these Plans called for a basement level, first floor level, mezzanine, and second floor level. Included in the basement level will be office Space for service providers, kitchenette, activity room, craft room and classroom. The first floor will include the director's office, receptionist/secretary, dining room, kitchen and a shop for selling crafts. The second floor will include space that will be suitable for offices and an exercise room. The mezzanine will have a library, work room, and conference room. She further explained that the building MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MONIES Committee on Community Needs October 3, 1979 Page 3 will have an elevator, all new stairways, and will he accessible to the h:ndicappod. Milkman asked if it would he convenient for the Committee to meet on October 31, which is the fifth Wednesday, rather than on November 7 since she will be out of town on November 7. The Committee was very agreeable to this change. McCormick requested a progress report on the Zoning Ordinance at the next meeting. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned for a tour of the old Post Office building so that members could sec how tine Senior Center plans would be implemented. i i Prepared bY<.___frZirr+ S,ndra Wilkinson, PPD Secretary I f f !' I 'f i i i I � _ MICROFILMED BY i JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOIIIES i MINUTES RIVERFRONT COMMISSION OCTOBER 3, 1979 -- 7:30 P.M. CITY MANAGER'S CONFERENCE ROOM MEMBERS PRESENT: Gilpin, Knight, Fountain, Sokol, Vetter, Kroeze MEMBERS ABSENT: Baker, BOUtclIC, Berry, Neuzil, Fahr STAFF PRESENT: Milkman SUMMARY OF DISCUSSION: Chairman Gilpin called the meeting to order and called for approval of the minutes for September 19, 1979. There being no corrections, the minutes were approved as written. Review of CIP Budget: Milkman presented the revised Capital Improvement Program budget for the establishment of a River Corridor Buffer and Trail system. It was moved by Sokol and seconded by Krocze that the CIP budget be adopted and printed as proposed for inclusion in the City's Capital Improvement Program. Unanimous. Boat Ramp: Milkman reported on the meeting of the Airport Commission on September 20, 1979, which she attended with Gilpin, Knight and Sokol. The preliminary boat ramp designs were presented at that meeting. After considerable discussion, the Airport Commission approved the following motion 3-1: That the Iowa City Municipal Airport Commission conditionally okays the construction of the River Front Commission's proposed boat ramp on said Sturgis Ferry Park land, conditions being; ' 1. That the Iowa City Municipal Airport Commission's attorney review any ramifications of ownership on said land. 2. That the total area of ramp and parking area be within the approach zone to runway 24. 3. That a proper lease be drawn between the Airport Commission and the City of Iowa City outlining legal boundaries of said land. Milkman stated that Howard Sokol and the City Legal staff drew up a Memorandum of r ( Understanding (attached) between the City and the Airport Commission. A copy of the memorandum was sent to Richard Phipps, Chairman of the Airport Commission; Mr. Phipps has been asked to attend the informal Council meeting on Monday, October 8, if he has any comments. Milkman also reported that the preliminary boat ramp designs had been presented to Council on September 24, and that the Council approved the plans and favored a speedy conclusion of the project. i 1939 PIICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES IIOIIIES � I I i I I f J f i � i i I 1 i II �j i i i Riverfront Commission Ortobor 3, 1979 Page 2 Streambank Erosion Control: Commission members reviewed a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers publication on erosion control. Gilpin recommended that this booklet be adapted to Iowa Citys standards when these standards are established by the River Corridor Overlay ordinance. River Corridor Overlay Zone Ordinance: There was some discussion on several items in the proposed ordinance as follows: I. There is some confusion due to the use of the word "zone" both as a area and as a "set of rules for the areall, geographical 2. Vetter felt very strongly that single family dwellings should not be exempt from filing a site plan (page 4). She recommended a SO' setback from the river channel as a minimum requirement. totally 3. ' On page 12 under Permitted Uses, special exception for marinas was questioned since this appears to be an appropriate use. In order to expedite review of the ordinance, the Commission set a special meeting for Wednesday, October 17, which will be devoted entirely to a discussion of th ordinance with the assistance of Don Schmeiser, Senior Planner. e There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned. Prepared by Marianne Milkman, Planner/Program Analyst MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES D MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING In accordance with a resolution passed September 19, 1979, the Iowa City Municipal Airport Commission hereby consents to the installa- tion of a boat ramp in Sturgis Ferry Park, due east of the present curb cut along Highway 218 south of the east -west runway centerline. In accordance with a resolution passed 1979, the City Council of the City of Iowa City hereby consents to the installa- tion of the above boat ramp in Sturgis Ferry Park. It is hereby agreed that the execution of this agreement and the construction of the boat ramp is not intended to relinquish or enhance any claim of right with regard to any portion of Sturgis Ferry Park. Dated: Dated: 1979 Chairperson 1979 Mayor Attest: City Clerk MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOVIES Ercy- P'r & .. By THE LEGAL PROPOSED IOWA RIVER CORRIDOR BUFFER AND TRAIT. SYSTEM k Priorities For Acquisition and 'frail Completion 1. Rocky Shore Drive trail $100,000 2. All curb cuts 1,400 3. Riverside Drive: Iowa Avenue to Burlington Trail construction 40,000 Guard Rail 10,000 4. Riverside Drive: Burlington Street to Sturgis Corner Easements $ 45,000 Purchase 65,000 Trail (asphalt) 10,0110 Trail (concrete sidewalk) 45,000 Total T165,000 Note: This cost does not include land donations and trail construction agreed upon by the owner of Sturgis Corner lots. S. Passage under U.S. 6 > Trail $ 4,250 Guardrail 7,500 Cutting 6 Stabalization 15,0110 Total 26,500 6. Sturgis Ferry Park Trail $ 25,000 7. Trail paralleling 218 on Frontage Road between Sturgis Ferry Park and Mesquakie Park Signing and street stencils $ 250 i (Does not include street repairs) 8. Mesquakie Park Trail $ 20,000 i Five Year Capital Improvement Program FY 81 $147,000 Rocky Shore Drive (1) Curb Cuts (2) Riverside Drive Sidewalk Improvements (4) !I PY 82 $ 65,000 Riverside Drive trail (Iowa to Burlington) (3) Easements on Riverside Drive (4) FY 83 $ 75,000 Land acquisition and trail on Riverside Drive (4) PY 84 $ 52,0011 j Passage under U.S. 6 (5) Sturgis Ferry Park trail (6) j 1.� MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB r + CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES I - R f: I -2- FY 85 $ 21,000 Paralleling 218 on Frontage Road (7) Mesquakie Park trail (8) Approved by the Riverfront Commission 10/3/79 MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES i i I i I .1 I I I � II' I I I L I L i I i `.I I FY 85 $ 21,000 Paralleling 218 on Frontage Road (7) Mesquakie Park trail (8) Approved by the Riverfront Commission 10/3/79 MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES MINUTES SENIOR CENTER COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 19, 1979 - 7:30 P.M. CITY MANAGER'S CONFERENCE ROOM MEMBERS PRESENT: Bourgeois, Carlton, Sando, Scott, Summerwill, Williams MEMBERS ABSENT: Ambrisco STAFF PRESENT: Berlin, Meisel GUESTS: Jo. Co. Board of Supervisors: Janet Shipton; Jo. Co. Council on Aging: Mildred Snider, H. Lee Jacobs, Alvin Logan, Stella M. Cooper, Maggie Penziner, Beulah Cora Pollock, Lee Poynter, Mary Rock, Albertan R. Brunton, Alice G. Fellows, Doris E. Bridgeman, Mary C. MacGibbon. SUMMARY OF DISCUSSION: Chairperson Carlton brought the meeting to order. Summerwill moved to adopt the minutes of August 22, 1979 as read. Williams seconded, action approved unanimously. to the attention the Commission account,lwhich astthe terminology used oin the Commission'sthat recommendation to the City Council regarding the Senior Center Gift Fund, was incorrect. Meisel explained that the Legal Department in reviewing the resolution had changed the wording. The resolution now authorizes the Finance Department to invest the funds in an appropriate manner. JOHNSON COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING PRESENTATION: Alvin Logan, member of the Johnson County Council on Aging Board, asked the Commission to consider a proposal to make the Council a part of the City services at the Senior Center. He said that presently they have a program but no money with which to finance it. Berlin replied that community f groups can provide some services better than the City. The City Council has been quite definite on the subject of providing no direct services at the Center, but rather providing the space for others to do so. Janet Counnongo ng support for County said aamount forugencies presently n housed tythe Close Mansion is unclear. Doris Bridgeman, Executive Director of Johnson County Council on Aging, 1 showed slides of their program and spoke about the role the Council plays in the elderly community. Berlin suggested that she repeat this presentation at an informal meeting of the City Council. i E' IIICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES /9L110 .k SENIOR CENTER COMMI:. .JN SEPTEMBER 19, 1979 Page 2 PRESENTATION OF DESIGN DEVELOPMENT PHASE OF ARCHITECTURAL PLANS Bill Nowysz and Walter Robolino explained the plans and the changes that have been made since the Commission last reviewed them. The Commission expressed no serious concerns as to these changes. The architects expect to receive an independent estimate of construction costs next week. In this way they will know if they are on target or if cuts need to be made. Berlin mentioned that a letter had been sent to Robert Welsh with carbon copies to Don Sehr and Russ Proffitt reiterated the City's position that the only money available for kitchen equipment was the $50,000 contributed by the County. Attached was a list of the essential equipment recommended by the architect and additional alternatives which could be chosen if the equipment on the essential list comes in low. OTHER BUSINESS: Meisel passed out sample statements of purpose, philosophy, objectives for Senior Center. She asked Sando to moderate the next meeting at which these would be discussed. The Commission decided that they needed a special work session in which to review these and draft their own. It was agreed to meet on September 26 at 7:30 PM in the City Manager's Conference Room. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned. Thea Sando, Secretary FIICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES .: SENIOR CENTER COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 26, 1979 - 7:30 P.M. CITY MANAGER'S CONFERENCE ROOM MEMBERS PRESENT: Carlton, Sando, Scott, Summerwill, Williams MEMBERS ABSENT: Ambrisco, Bourgeois STAFF PRESENT: Meisel SUMMARY OF DISCUSSION: A discussion was held in which the Commission exchanged information as to the events which lead up to the present status of the Senior Center. It was determined that the priority item of business was the formal recommendation to Council of which agencies should be invited to locate at the Senior Center. At this point there is an informal agreement between certain agencies and the City, but nothing in writing. The Commission advised Meisel to have available at their next meeting material concerning the agencies and their requirements; guidelines and policies for use of Center space by agencies; what exactly the City is offering these agencies; what the City expects in return. A draft of a survey prepared by the Gerontology Project was passed out. This survey could provide the City, County and University with information about the 7,000 county elderly. This information would be useful in planning services, projects, activities and classes to meet the needs and interests of the community. It was agreed that members would be prepared to critique it at their next meeting. The Commission decided that they would again attempt to begin their study of Senior Center purpose, goals and objectives at the next regular meeting. There being no f rther business, the meeting was adjourned. Thea S� cretary. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOVIES MINUTES HOUSING APPEALS BOARD September 27, 1979 -- 7:00 P.M. MEMBERS PRESENT: Klaus, VanderZee, Smithey, Graf, Dennis. STAFF PRESENT: Cook, Steinbach, Kuebler, Vezina. OTHERS PRESENT: Michael Kennedy, David Poula, Ralph Neuzi1. Chairperson Klaus asked for corrections or changes to the minutes of the board meeting of September 13, 1979. VanderZee moved, Dennis seconded, that VanderZee's motion located on page 7 be revised to show that the intent of the motion was not to require the City to cover the cost of the damages to Mr. Bright regarding the installation of handrails. Steinbach stated that the tapes of the hearing would be rechecked and the minutes would be corrected if they showed a misquote. Motion carried unanimously. Graf moved, Dennis seconded, that the minutes of the meeting of September 13 be approved as amended. Acceptance was approved by unanimous vote. Chairperson Klaus swore in those who would testify. NOTE: Willie Wulf was not sworn in as he stated he would not testify. BOARD TO HEAR THE CASE OF WILLIE WULF & MS. ROSE CAMPBELL - Steinbach stated that the appeal had been properly filed and that the appeal had been requested by both Willie Wulf and Rose Campbell. It was noted for the record that this case was being heard for the first time; however, it was being heard on a continuous basis since it was first slated to be heard at the September 13 hearing. Steinbach then asked Mike Kennedy if he was representing both Ms. Campbell and Mr. Wulf. Mr. Kennedy replied that yes he was. Kuebler stated that on June 21 he conducted an annual inspection with manager Willie Wulf on the property located at 915 E. Washington. A notice of violation was served to Mr. Wulf on July 13, and on July 16 Mr. Wulf came to the office of the Housing Division and at that time it was agreed that the inspector would remeasure the ceilings of the third floor apartment as per a request by Mr. Wulf. On July 17, Inspector Kuebler did, in fact, remeasure the ceiling height of the third floor apartment. Inspector Kuebler then read into the minutes the applicable code section which states the required ceiling height in all habitable rooms. Kuebler then entered three photographs of the third floor dwelling unit for the record and they were marked exhibits 1, 2 and 3. Both Mr. Wulf and Mr. Kennedy approved the photographs as accurate record. Inspector Kuebler explained to the Board the layout of the third floor apartment and presented evidence regarding the actual measurements of the knee walls, the sloping walls and the peak ceiling. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES 1401NES 041 HOUSING APPEALS BOARD September 27, 1979 Page 2 Kennedy asked whether "ceiling" was ever defined in the Iowa City Housing Code. Kuebler responded that no, not to his knowledge. Kennedy then read Webster's definition of "ceiling" to the Board members. Kennedy presented his feelings to the Board regarding the language of the ceiling height requirements and stated that a dwelling unit such as this should really not be taken off the market. He stated that he would be willing to work with members of the Board and staff in finding an alternate interpretation of the Code in order that such a dwelling unit could remain on the market. Klaus asked Cook if it would be appropriate to go to the dictionary for a definition of the term "ceiling" if it was not already defined in the Code. Cook stated that most lawyers do go to the dictionary for definitions. However, it should be noted that the interpretation should include a common sense aspect also. The question was brought up by the Board that, in a case such as this where there are slanted areas, when does a wall become a ceiling? Webster's dictionary defines a "ceiling" as being overhead. Steinbach stated that the department's interpretation of the Code is such that a ceiling is measured at that point in which the measurement between the floor and the ceiling is at least seven feet. In single family dwellings and duplexes, the square footage of a room may be figured from that point at which that measurement is five feet. Kuebler read the entire Code section into the minutes, and Steinbach stated that in computing the average ceiling height there are two other factors which enter into the requirements. First, that a computation of the square footage of a habitable room is measured at those points in which the ceiling height is seven feet or above, and secondly, that all habitable rooms must have a width of at least seven feet. Steinbach then went to the blackboard and drew a diagram of this third floor apartment and showed the method by which both ceiling height and square footage of a habitable room are computed. Klaus asked Kennedy about the appeal regarding electrical outlets. Kennedy responded that he had mainly investigated the appeal of ceiling heights and that Mr. Wulf could supply more accurate information regarding the electrical outlets. Wulf stated that he had spoken to an electrician and that all electrical changes could be made. However, they would all be surface mounted. He stated that there was considerable expense in complying with the Code; however, compliance could be made if an adequate amount of time was given, i.e. about 60 days. The question of required light switches was discussed which showed that Steinbach and Kuebler had conducted an inspection to double check the location of required light switches and that the violation had been properly cited as per current departmental policy. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES Mo111ES HOUSING APPEAL.. BOARD September 27, 1979 Page 3 Wulf stated that all other corrections regarding the notice would be made within the alloted amount of time given in the notice of violation. Kennedy asked another question regarding the ceiling height violation - what is a finished ceiling? Steinbach replied that it would be a smooth area that the inspector could stretch a measuring tape from the floor to measure the given ceiling height. Kennedy asked whether that was, in fact, an administrative interpretation. Steinbach replied that there were other code requirements referring to the condition and general maintenance aspects of walls, floors and ceilings, and the interpretation was derived from those types of requirements. Kennedy asked that the Board give the statute a liberal interpretation and that a more accurate definition of the term "ceiling" be sought for clarification. VanderZee stated that even if it were possible to compute the ceiling height in a different manner, perhaps according to Webster, that the apartment would still be in violation of the requirements of space or square footage. Kennedy replied that lack of room area was not listed on the notice of violation. He then asked if it would be possible to compute the dimensions of this dwelling unit in such a way as to show that the unit would conform to the requirements of the Housing Code. Cook then asked whether the computations could be conducted in a different fashion also. Kuebler again gave the Board an explanation of the ceiling configuration and stated that a more liberal interpretation of the Code regarding required floor area would show that at the actual floor level a computation of the square footage would show that the dwelling unit conformed to the minimum requirements. Steinbach stated that the requirements being discussed are requirements which are also found in the State Code. He stated that the problem is primarily being generated in those dwellings which were originally built and used as single family dwellings and had, at a later date, been converted in use to a multiple status. The basements and the attic areas of these dwellings were not originally intended to be used as habitable space. He stated that the method of calculating the requirements and/or deficiencies was an accurate method. However, it was his personal feeling that this unit was, in fact, a clean and safe unit. He stated that the department, in enforcement of these requirements, is being forced to vacate units which otherwise would be perfectly adequate living quarters. Klaus asked Kennedy whether any investigation had been done to find out whether the dwelling would conform to the requirements of the grandfather clause regarding ceiling height. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES 1101HES HOUSING APPEAL.. BOARD September 27, 1979 Page 4 Kennedy replied that no investigation had been done at this time. Cook submitted to the board a definition of ceiling found in the arch- itectural and building trades dictionary. This was read into the minutes by Kennedy. VanderZee stated that although he was very sympathetic to the appellants, he could not see any way in which the Board could not uphold the notice of violation as written. VanderZee moved, Dennis seconded, that the violations be upheld. Klaus stated that for the Board to do anything other than uphold the State Code they would be left open to liability. Klaus stated that the Board, in the form of a Housing Commission, had made recommendations to Council to alter these requirements. However, it was noted in Council that the requirements could not, by law, be less stringent than those found in the State Code. The Housing Board stated that this problem should be put on the agenda of the Housing Commission to make suggestions that the City Council contact the State Legislature in exposing these problems and that suggestions be made to change the requirements on the State level. Steinbach stated that he had just completed an analysis of the State Housing Code, State Building Code, and local housing code, which would be submitted to City Council to show the inconsistencies between the codes and said memorandum would eventually be forwarded to the State Legislature. The notice of violation was upheld by the Housing Board of Appeals on a unanimous vote. BOARD TO HEAR THE CASE OF MR. DOUGLAS EDMONDS - 728 E. COLLEGE Steinbach stated that the appeal had been properly filed and that as was the case with the prior hearing, this appeal was being heard for the first time on a continuance basis. Kuebler stated that he had conducted this request inspection on July 10 as per the wishes of Mr. Jerry Zaiser. Mr. Zaiser came to the Housing Division and picked up the notice of violation on July 19. Kuebler stated that on July 27, an administrative review was conducted regarding this case. Pursuant to that administrative review, two of the light switches which had originally been required in the notice of violation were at that time rescinded due to departmental policy. Kuebler read into the minutes the applicable code sections requiring light switches. Kuebler stated that the departmental policy regarding light switches was such that a light switch would be located at each exterior entrance into a dwelling unit and that switches should be located in such a manner that egress from any habitable room to the exterior of the dwelling unit could be lit in case of an emergency. Kuebler showed the Appeals Board a diagram of the floor plan, drawn from memory, with the approval of Mr. Edmonds. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 140IIIES HOUSING APPEAL- .,OARD September 27, 1979 Page 5 Steinbach presented the policy that was being used by the Housing Division in regards to the light switch requirement, since there was some gray area as to the way the requirement is written. He then went to the blackboard to illustrate the light switch installations being required of Mr. Edmonds. Existing switches were diagrammed and their functions were noted. Steinbach stated that light switches would be required at the exterior entrances to a dwelling unit; however, if there were more than two such exterior entrances, since the Housing Code only requires two means of egress, the same policy is being applied with regard to light switches in that only two exterior entrances would need to have switches for the purpose of illuminating those rooms adjacent to the entrances. Steinbach stated that due to the ambiguity of the code language in regards to light switches, that it had been extremely difficult to formulate a policy to be used to enforce the requirement. Since every dwelling unit is different, the department would certainly welcome any suggestions from the Housing Appeals Board in formulating a policy regarding said enforcement. VanderZee questioned Mr. Edmonds in regards to the fact that this was a request inspection. Edmonds replied that he and two associates had decided to purchase the property and wanted to make sure that it conformed to the requirements of the Housing Code. Upon receiving the notice of violation, they felt that the requirement of light switches was unreasonable and that all the other violations were, in fact, items which they agreed should be corrected. He stated that even though he did not expect the Board to take it into consideration, the installation of said light switches would create an initial hardship for the owners because at this point they were only breaking even on the investment. Graf questioned Mr. Edmonds as to the current use of the dwelling since it i had been stated that the supplied facilities, i.e. kitchen facilities were located in the basement for those roomers who occupy the second floor. Edmonds replied that the house was owned, and the rooming units were operated by, the prior owner who maintained her living quarters on the first floor and that the tenants seemed to be quite satisfied with the geographic location of the supplied facilities. There was some question as to what sort of illuminaries or lights were being required by the Code at this time. Steinbach clarified the intention of the Code by stating that it was necessary that there be a wall mounted switch which activated an illuminary within the habitable room. A viable substitution for a switch would be wall mounted light fixture with a switch attached to it. Kuebler went to the blackboard and made clarification of the light switches that were being required by the City. Edmonds stated that in certain parts of the dwelling, he felt that there was enough spill light from other rooms to meet the requirements of the Code. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES IIOIREs HOUSING APPEAL. BOARD September 27, 1979 Page 6 VanderZee stated that the policy being implemented by the City could be much more stringent than it was in that they could be requiring a light switch at each and every entrance to a room, therefore requiring a light switch on each side of every entry between rooms. VanderZee moved, Dennis seconded, that the notice of violation be upheld as amended. After some confusion and extensive clarification, "amended" was determined to mean that a light switch would be required at the exterior entrance to the kitchen, at the exterior entrance to the living room, and at the entrance to the living room from the kitchen. Motion carried unanimously. Smithey, who had been absent for the first part of the meeting, joined the other board members. VanderZee left the meeting. BOARD TO HEAR THE CASE OF MRS. REGINA HENNESSEY - 234 N. Mg5IS0N Those present in the Hennessey party were Mrs. Regina Hennessey, Mrs. Hennessey's son, Paul, Attorney David Poula, and tenant Thomas Mishak. Those who would testify were sworn in by Chairperson Klaus. an Steinbach inspectiontn atthis property June 26, and oInspector July23 he issued a notKellVezina iceofviolation to Mrs. Hennessey. This notice of violation was received by Mr. Paul Hennessey on July 25. A letter requesting an appeal before the Board i was received by the City Clerk on July 31, it was written by Atty. David P. Poula. Steinbach stated that subsequent to the notice of violation being issued to Mrs. Hennessey, an administrative review had been conducted and it was found that two of the items listed on the notice of violations had been sited under the incorrect chapter numbers. A notice was then sent to Mr. Poula and Mrs. Hennessey to inform them of the proper code sections. Paula stated that pursuant to the notice of violation, all of the elec- trical work being required had already been done and that in regards to the lack of valid permit, he had in his possession a "certificate of compliance" so that the only violation being appealed at this time was the lack of required window area in Mrs. Hennessey's dwelling unit. The letter written in clarification of the notice of violation was read into the record by Inspector Vezina and accepted by the Board as part of the public record. Inspector Vezina then went to the blackboard where he had drawn a diagram of the entire basement of Mrs. Hennessey's dwelling. He stated the requirements of the State Code regarding window area and also gave the board information concerning the required amount of window area if a window is to be used for the second means of egress. Smithey questioned whether the requirement for a second means of egress had been cited on the notice of violation. Inspector Vezina replied that MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 1401IIES HOUSING APPEAL_ BOARD September 27, 1979 Page 7 no, it had not, however the information was being supplied to the Appeals Board such that, if Mrs. Hennessey were required to install more or larger windows in her dwelling unit, that this requirement would certainlbe a consideration in said installation. y Poula asked when the requirement of window area had been adopted as a City Code. Steinbach stated that to the best of his knowledge, it would seem logical that since this requirement was found in the State Housing Code, that it would have been part of the Iowa City Housing Code at whatever time the housing code was adopted by the City. The specific date was not determined; however, Poula stated that it really was not necessary information for this hearing. Mrs. Hennessey stated that she had lived at this dwelling for 50 years, it had been a rooming house for 50 years, and that there was no longer any private property surrounding her dwelling. She stated that all adjacent property belongedf Iowa. whichShasstloc t daacrossCtity he street, and built a waterworks there. She stated that she had no place to go except for where she was. According to Mr. Poula's question to Mrs. Hennessey, she stated that approximately 20 years ago, an agreement had been reached between Mr. Poula's senior partner; Mr. Cahill, and the University stating that Mrs. Hennessey could live at her residence as long as she wanted to. She stated that this was the only reason she was the last one still living in this neighborhood. She stated that her age was 88 years and that she wished to live at her residence until she died. Paul Hennessey stated that he had all the electrical work done that had been requested and that the total cost had been $1244. He stated that the monthly income on the property was approximately $450. i Poula stated that it is unreasonable for the City to require Mrs. Hennessey to add approximately $10400 of windows since the University will acquire Mrs. Hennessey's property upon her death. He stated that he was asking the Housing Appeals Board to overrule this requirement and to let Mrs. Hennessey live in peace and she should have the right to live wherever she wants to. Graf stated that she felt they could not require Mrs. Hennessey to change the windows since this is her private residence and the City does not require that of other owner occupied residences. Steinbach stated it had been the previous policy of the division not to inspect those portions of a rental property which were occupied by the owner. However, as of a year ago, inspections had begun of each and every dwelling unit within a complex or rooming house for the purpose of determining total compliance within any given structure so that when a rental permit was issued, it could be shown from a liability standpoint of the City that the whole structure conformed to the requirements of the Code. i- -- - - .. .,..,.., MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES HOUSING APPEALa dOARD September 27, 1979 Page 8 Cook submitted information found in the Housing Code which gives authority of the Housing Inspector to inspect all dwelling units which are either lived in by an owner/operator or by tenants. She stated that the scope of the Housing Code would include private dwellings within the City. She stated that an administrative policy was such that inspections were only conducted on single family dwellings due to complaints or in a situation such as this where the owner lived in one of the units located within the rooming house or apartment building. Poula stated that this structure had been built some 80 years ago and that it had been operated as a rooming house for at least 50 years and that the lack of required window area in no way affected the tenants which rented from Mrs. Hennessey. It was also stated that there were no grandfather clauses which would affect this window requirement. Poula stated; the fact that Mrs. Hennessey continues to live at this residence is due to an oral agreement by the University that Mrs. Hennessey can continue to live at this residence for as long as she lives. This agreement has been honored by the University through at least a half a dozen instances. Steinbach asked Mrs. Hennessey and Mr. Poula if this residence had in some way changed use, i.e. was the basement originally built as a basement or was it originally constructed as a dwelling unit. Mr. Hennessey and Mr. Poula replied that the basement rooms had been used for sleeping purposes by Mr. Hennessey and Mrs. Hennessey for approximately 49 years. Mr. Hennessey's bedroom was originally the coal room. Poula submitted to the Board a certificate of compliance issued in March, 1978. This was done to show that Mrs. Hennessey was not operating without a valid permit. Vezina stated that, although it is not noted on the certificate of compliance, the expiration date would be in May, 1979. Mr. Hennessey stated that it was the City's fault in not contacting Mrs. Hennessey to let her know that a new permit must be applied for at the proper time. After further inspection of the property file, it was found that application for a housing permit was made on June 6, 1979. Inspector Vezina explained to the Board members the policy regarding application for a permit and the scheduling of annual inspections. It was then noted that a permit is not issued until all corrections are made; however, a copy of a permit application is sent to the owner if proper application has been made and a fee has been paid. Poula stated, for the record, that the only violations that are being appealed are those of lack of valid permit and lack of required window area. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES 110111ES HOUSING APPEAL- BOARD September 27, 1979 Page 9 Smithey stated that due to the unusual aspects of this case that he felt it was the Board's responsibility to treat it as a separate case and therefore he moved that the violation of lack of permit be upheld and that the violation of lack of required window area not be upheld. Graf seconded, motion passed by unanimous vote. BOARD TO CONSIDER THE CASE OF ROBERT RHODES - 611 N. JOHNSON Mr. Rhodes and Atty. Ralph Neuzil were sworn in by Chairperson Klaus. Steinbach stated that the property was inspected by Inspector Brian Kuebler on August 2, 1979. Mr. Rhodes received a notice of violation regarding the property on August 6. On August 10, a letter was received by the City Clerk from Mr. Rhodes requesting a hearing before the Housing Appeals Boar. Therefore, the appeal was properly submitted. Kuebler asked Mr. Rhodes for further clarification of the actual items being appealed. Mr. Neuzil replied that they wished to amend the appeal due to the fact that after Mr. Rhodes had contacted a carpenter, a doorway listed as a violation could not, in fact, be raised to meet the requirements of the Code without causing structural problems. That item is listed as 3.a. Lack of sufficient doorway height. It was agreed by all in attendance that this matter could also be addressed at this hearing. Kuebler stated that in his annual inspection it was determined that the maximum ceiling height in the basement unit was six feet, six inches. Kuebler read into the minutes Chapter 17-6.(d) which he stated was the reference made on the notice of violation, however, the less restrictive code section which would actually apply to this case was 17-6.(f)3. Inspector Kuebler then read that code section into the minutes. He stated that the less restrictive code section required a 7 foot ceiling in the basement apartment. In the basement unit the minimum ceiling height was 6 feet, 4 inches and the maximum height was 6 feet, 6 inches. He also stated as per the amended appeal, that the doorway in question measured 5 feet, 9 inches in height, whereas, the requirement for the height of said door is 6 feet, 4 inches. Cook asked Atty. Neuzil whether he would accept the amended code section. Mr. Neuzil replied that he had no objection to that amendment. Mr. Rhodes stated, in response to questions asked by Mr. Neuzil, that he had purchased the property a little over four years ago and that at time of purchase there was representation that the dwelling did comply with the Housing Code. He stated that the basement apartment had been in use for at least 25 years and that during the inspection, Inspector Kuebler had stated that it was one of the nicer apartments he had inspected. lie stated that currently the building is not paid for; however, the money received from rental of this unit was necessary to make payments on the building. He stated that if the Appeals Board were to uphold the City's violation, that the only means of correction would be to raise the whole house or to lower and replace the floor. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MONIES HOUSING APPEAL. BOARD September 27, 1979 Page 10 Mr. Neuzil asked Mr. Rhodes how much equity he had in the house. Mr. Rhodes replied that the property was appraised at $55,000 last May. He stated that he would have to sell the property if he could not continue to rent out the basement unit. There have never been any complaints from tenants due to the lack of required ceiling height. Neuzil asked Kuebler if he was aware of the reason that there was such a requirement. Kuebler replied that it was not instituted for the purpose of headroom, that the purpose, to his understanding, was for air space, especially in case of a fire. It would provide a few extra seconds or minutes for a person to have time to escape from a unit. Kuebler stated that he was not prepared to determine the safety aspects of the apartment regarding the current ceiling height. Neuzil asked Kuebler when this property was last inspected in order to issue a permit. Kuebler replied that according to the file a reinspection had been conducted to determine code compliance in 1977. Mr. Rhodes concurred with that information. Kuebler stated the last applicable permit regarding this property expired in April, 1978. The age of the structure was discussed by the Board, however, an actual date of construction could not be determined at this meeting, nor, could any change of use or classification in accordance with the exemption clause of the Housing Code. Smithey asked Mr. Rhodes, as had Mr. Neuzil, how much equity he had in the house. Mr. Rhodes replied that he had paid $289 a month on the property since he purchased it, and that he had put approximately $4,000 into the house in the form of windows and about that much also in the form of furnaces for each floor. He stated that he had mortgaged the house that he lives in now in order to purchase the property. i Smithey explored the question of equity a bit further by asking what would be the financial impact if the Board were to uphold this notice of violation. Mr. Neuzil replied that he would definitely have to sell the property if this violation was upheld, Mr. Rhodes concurred.He stated that with the loss of income from the basement apartment, $160 monthly, he would not have enough to keep up payments on his other responsibilities of paying for the windows and furnaces. He stated that total income on the property per month is $600. Klaus felt that a consideration which could be made would be to postpone a decision regarding the ceiling height to see if more information could be gathered as to the age of the house and whether it would fall within the scope of the grandfather clause. Steinbach voiced an objection to that proposal since, if it could be proven to the Housing Inspector that the structure did meet the quali- fications, enforcement of that citation would at that time be suspended. He stated that even if the Board chose to uphold the violation, the City would drop enforcement under those circumstances. f�_— _ -- —,..,,, MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES HOUSING APPEAL, BOARD September 27, 1979 Page 11 Neuzil stated that Mr. Rhodes had done every reasonable thing a prospective buyer could do in regards to purchasing a property, and that he felt that the City keeps changing rules and that it is not fair to the property owner that they are made to comply with all new changes that the City wishes to make. He further asked that if this requirement was a state law at the time Mr. Rhodes purchased the property, why did the City go ahead and certify the use of the basement unit. He felt that the City is penalizing the owner for a mistake of the City. Cook asked the board members to refer to the memorandum which was included in the board members' packets written by Angela Ryan regarding the estoppel argument. She stated that if an inspector had misapplied the law with no intent to deceive the owner, then the City could not be held responsible for such actions. She stated that it was her opinion that there was no intent to deceive or defraud in the past. Steinbach stated that this violation was probably found at this time due to the fact that, initiated one year ago was the policy of drawing floor plans of those structures which the City inspects annually and issues rental permits for. This is done to show that an accurate and thorough inspection is conducted at that time. Neuzil asked that if the purpose of the Board was simply to hear and uphold notices of violation without applying a sensitivity to the problem, why was the option of having an appeal heard before the Board even implemented. He felt that it may be just as well to start a lawsuit in district court rather than take the time to go before the Housing Appeals Board. He asked whether it was not the purpose of this hearing to determine a practical way to solve the problem. He felt that jacking up the house six inches or lowering the floor six inches was not a practical way to comply with the code. He asked why there could not be some sort of variance granted if all of the other requirements were met, provided that all other requirements were met. He asked if this was a serious enough violation to warrant the closing of the entire dwelling unit. i Discussion ensued regarding a valid permit. Neuzil stated that they would concede that they do not have, at this time, a valid housing permit. Dennis moved that items 1, 3 and 5 of the notice of violation be upheld. Motion died for lack of second. Smithey, too, questioned the purpose of the Housing Appeals Board, stating that, on one hand, he felt it was Board's responsibility to rely on the decisions made in courts of -law, but that to his knowledge only one or two decisions of the Housing Appeals Board have been further appealed in district court and he did not remember that they dealt with this particular violation. He stated that he would very much like to hear what the district court would have to say regarding this housing violation. He further stated that the constitutionality of these requirements could be determined in district court and such a precedent would be quite helpful to the Housing Appeals Board. Smithey stated that the estoppel argument was of great concern to him and that if the Appeals Board does not grant exceptions in particular cases, then the burden and expense of a decision in district court is put on the owner. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOVIES HOUSING APPEAL..;OARD September 27, 1979 Page 12 Klaus stated that recently it had been the determination of the City Council that they would not intervene in a decision which should be made by the Housing Appeals Board. It is the purpose of the Housing Appeals Board to make decisions in regards to interpretations of the Code. Cook stated that it was her feeling that the violation of ceiling height being discussed did not leave any flexibility to the Board in making its final determination because the interpretation of the Code, she felt was quite specific. Klaus stated that the situation was such that the Housing Appeals Board was appointed by the City Council and that the staff was actually responsible to the City Manager. However, Cook replied that her responsibility was also to represent the Housing Appeals Board. Smithey stated that there is an obvious conflict there, in that, the attorney must represent both the board and the staff. Smithey stated the situation at hand is such that the City is intervening between an agreement between the landlord and the tenant. He felt that perhaps the responsibility of the board would be to intervene in this conflict. He felt that perhaps it was the responsibility of the Housing Appeals Board to force the City into court to resolve this problem. Klaus stated that members of the Housing Appeals Board were, of course, also members of the Housing Commission. The duty of the Housing Commission is to find adequate housing and there is some conflict, in that the Housing Appeals Board is forced to, in effect, close other housing units. Neuzil asked that if a case is real close in regards to complying or not complying with the code, where is the cutoff of those violations which would be cited. Cook replied that there is discretion implemented; however, she did not feel that this was a close case. Cook asked Mr. Rhodes whether he had purchased this property with the advice of legal counsel. Mr. Rhodes replied that yes, in fact, he had retained an attorney to research the property prior to purchase. He stated that at time of purchase there was a valid permit issued for the property. The Board asked Inspector Kuebler to explain his finding regarding inadequate plumbing. Kuebler stated that during his inspection, it was found that the faucet on the tub was located below the rim of the tub and that that constituted a violation insofar as it could cause a backflow problem and water contamination. He then explained the series of events that could lead to such backflow and water contamination. He submitted a diagram which is part of an inspection manual issued by the government showing how this installation could constitute inadequate and dangerous plumbing. Kuebler further stated that after a discussion with the Plumbing Inspector of the MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOIRES HOUSING APPEAL_ BOARD September 27, 1979 Page 13 City, he was informed that there are installations in Iowa City such that if a second floor faucet is in the open position and a first floor faucet is opened, smoke from say, a cigarette, would be drawn right into the faucet on the second floor. The Board considered the question of if there was no motion regarding the case, what would be the outcome. It was determined that precedents have been set in previous appeals board hearings that the violation would be upheld in such an event. Board took a three minute break. Graf left the hearing. Klaus asked Cook if the City had pursued any cases in court regarding the ceiling height violation. Cook replied no, not to her knowledge. Smithey then asked Steinbach if there were any cases where the Board had upheld a notice of violation regarding ceiling height and the City had pursued no further enforcement action. Steinbach replied no, that to the best of his knowledge the City had gone ahead and enforced the decision of the Housing Appeals Board. Klaus brought up the fact that there had been a previous case that the Housing Appeals Board had not upheld the City in a notice of violation and that the Director of Housing & Inspection Services had recommended to the City Council that the City appeal that decision in Court and that the City Council had chosen not to do so. She said that particular case was based on particular circumstances which warranted such action and that it was not done to set a precedent and so the Appeals Board did not honor any future arguments which were brought in connection with that specific case. She stated that it was the Council's decision to appeal any decisions made by the Housing Appeals Board. Klaus stated that there is one other case currently in court that the Council has chosen to appeal the decision of the Board; however, the Council has not asked for any resignations from any members of the Board. Smithey moved, Dennis seconded, that M1, Lack of valid permit be upheld, and that k3, N4, and N5 dealing with inadequate plumbing, lack of sufficient doorway height, and lack of required ceiling height not be upheld. Klaus stated for the record that in not upholding these violations, it was an attempt to get the Council to pursue these types of problems in the Housing Code. Smithey stated that he wanted it also on the record that the Board did not feel that the staff was in error in issuing this notice of violation and this decision was not meant to set a precedent for future inspections. Cook stated that she would be much more comfortable with the board's decision if the evidence presented would show that in upholding this violation it would, from a financial viewpoint, constitute a "taking" Smithey stated that he felt that this had already been implied by MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES 140111ES r HOUSING APPEAL_ dOARD September 27, 1979 Page 14 Mr. Rhodes' statements. Cook replied that as an evidentiary matter, she did not feel that had been proven. The City is not authorized to take property without due process. Smithey's motion to uphold violation #1 and not uphold #3, #4 and #5 was passed by unanimous'vote. OTHER BUSINESS Steinbach stated that he has received a couple of requests for hearings which were filed past the 10 day deadline. He further stated that the City has tried to give everyone appeal rights in a generous fashion; however, he was not comfortable with accepting these late requests. He stated that it is obvious that enforcement of the Housing Code has been stepped up, otherwise there would not be backlog at this time of some 28 cases. He stated that the individuals requesting these hearings had contacted him personally and he had told them he would take their requests to the Housing Appeals Board. However, he stated; it must be the City's stance that they not be honored since it is administrative policy and City law that application be made within a prescribed amount of time. He stated that if the appeal deadline were to end on a weekend day, that he would accept applications for an appeal hearing on the following Monday. However, such was not the case in the two letters that he was presenting at this time. It was the Board's decision that individuals had waived their appeal rights if they had not made proper application within the prescribed amount of time. Meeting adjourned. PREPARED BY: APPROVED BY: MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES 3 V Minutes: Iowa City Airport Commission September 20, 1979 Iowa City Civic Center Members Present: Bleckwenn, Embree, Redick, Saeugling Members Absent: Phipps Summary of Discussion and Actions Taken: The meeting was called to order by Saeugling, in the absence of Chairman Phipps. Approval of the minutes of the August meeting was deferred until next month. It was moved by Embree, second by Bleckwenn to approve the bills for the month. Motion carried. Embree reported that she had inspected Sturgis Ferry Park, and that she could substantiate Gleaves' allegations that the City uses it for an equipment dump and salvage yard. She reported that the City Manager assures that it will be cleaned up this fall. General discussion followed. Bill Gilpin, Chairman of the Iowa City Riverfront Commission, and Mary Ann Milkman presented their proposals for the design and location of a boat ramp on the Iowa River. It would be on the west bank, directly across from the airport's brick hangar, which sits next to the threshold of runway 24. Design plans were distributed to Commission members. General discussion followed. i Embree asked why the Riverfront Commission chose that particular location. Milkman replied that the local fishermen would like to j have a ramp close to the Burlington St. dam. She also commented that, at present, there is no boat ramp on the Iowa River in Iowa City. Also, the location proposed is near highway 218, a main entryway to j Iowa City; a dock there would focus attention on the river. Gilpin reported that the funding will come 50/50 from the State Conservation Commission Marine Fuel Tanks Fund and from Community Development. Embree asked about other possible locations. Milkman reported that a ramp could not be built near the sewage plant because of many eddies and currents, and also the liability of people walking around the open tanks. Napoleon Park was another possibility, however it is farther downstream from the Burlington St. dam than the proposed site. General discussion followed. f Redick asked if the ICMAC would be making a statement as to owner - i ship of the property in question by permitting a boat ramp to be built there. Gilpin quoted a letter from Berlin, dated July 16,179 f stating that it would not affect the position of the ICMAC or City Council as to ownership. General discussion followed. Jones commented that the Riverfront Commission's proposed site near the airport's hangar was, in his opinion, ideal, and he encouraged such a development. General discussion followed. It was moved by Bleckwenn, second by Redick, that the ICMAC conditionally O.K. the construction of the Riverfront Commission's proposed boatramp on MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES 1: (2) said Sturgis Ferry Park, conditions being: (1) that the ICMAC's attorney review any ramifications of ownership on said land (2) that the total area of the ramp and park be within the approach zone to runway 29 (3) that a proper lease be drawn between the ICMAC and the city of Iowa City outlining the legal boundries of said land. Motion carried, with Bleckwenn, Redick, and Saeugling voting aye, Embree nay. Dave Byers, the Master Plan consultant, presented the major alter- natives open to the ICRAC and the Iowa City communitys (1) no development of the airport (2) obtain a new site (3) develop the existing site Advantages and disadvantages of each alternative were discussed. General discussion followed. Embree stated that many people would not accept lengthening a runway as a primary alternative. Redick commented that while many people would be in favor adding aircraft parking spaces and taxiway lights, they would not be in favor of longer runways. General discussion followed. Byers commented, in response to several questions, that should plans for runway extension be on the Master Plan Study for 1986-90, the runway would not necessarily have to be extended between 186 and '90. General discussion followed. Embree questioned the part of the Master Plan Study (MPS) which stated that jets cannot be prevented from using the Iowa City airport. Byers answered that the statement stemmed from a Federal Court case involving the Santa Monica airport. General discussion followed. iByers stated that the money to improve the existing airport would come from the FAA's planning grant program which is funded by people who buy aircraft tires, airline tickets, and avgas. General discussion followed. Embree commented that on the next MPS draft, she would like to see more footnotes, page numbers, better spelling and punctuation, and less text ambiguity. She specified that the draft should explain how the estimated costs were obtained. General discussion followed. Redick asked about the status of the environmental impact statement. Byers reported that the environmental assessment report can't be written until the ICMAC decides which alternative to go with. He also reported that, for federal funding, the ICMAC needs only an airport layout plan and an environmental assessment report. General discussion followed. Carol deProsse asked that three points be clarified: (1) that the figures used in the MPS forecasts through the year 2000 are in 1979 dollars] Byers stated that they were. (2) would the MPS address the question of what land might be acquired by Iowa City as a protective area around the air- port; Byers stated that this would not be done until the ICMAC recommends an alternative, e.g, to develop the existing site. In that case, the problem of acquiring land would be part of airport development and would be part of the study. (3) an explanation of the court case in Santa Monica; MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOINES (3) Byers stated that he would try to obtain documentation within a week. Ed Thomas questioned whether the Kimball Co. has studied what he termed deficiencies and points of violation around the airport. He stated that these should be in the report. General discussion followed. Mr. Sonnig mentioned that although prime farmland would be sacri- ficed for a new airport, industry does this anyway. Byers commented that it is not easy or sometimes possible to take someone's farm to use for an airport. Sonnig commented that the Kimball Co. has based its study on projected use of the Iowa City airport. New developments may take place in the next twenty years to make the airport insufficient. Byers reported that the first two forecasts are for ten years, and that such things as hangars and aprons would be built on demand. General discussion followed. Ken Lowder asked if Byers could project ten to twenty years into the future to get the impact of the airport on the surrounding area, with and without a runway extension. Byers stated that if the ICMAC opts for developing the existing site, that such a study will be added to his contract. Lowder commented that the existing study shows no recommendation to change the situation of people affected by the traffic pattern at Iowa City. Byers reported that noise abatement will be part of the MPS after the ICMAC makes a decision concerning the three major alternatives. Dale Rockenbrach commented that advancements in aircraft technology might soon permit jets to land safely on relatively short runways. Byers reported that the MPS has taken that into account. Rockenbrach also commented on the monetary.advanbages of building a completely new airport. Duane Ingram commented that a new airport would not be the equivalent of the present one, as it would have only two runways. He also commented that should a certain runway be made more convenient to pilots, they would use it more often, and thus avoid runways with potential noise problems. Dick Blum, chairman of the Iowa City Planning and Zoning Commission (ICPZC) stated that his commission is considering providing the ICMAC with a plan of artificial surfaces through which ground construction couldn't penetrate. It was moved by Bleckwenn, second by Redick that the ICMAC endorse and actively encourage the ICPZC to proceed with flat plane zoning of the Iowa City area. Motion carried. Saeugling read a letter from the FAA dated August 17, 179, concerning student flying restrictions. Redick read a letter from Willard Binns in which he reported that a Crystal -Shamrock airplane flew too low over his house, near the Iowa City airport, on August 28, 179. Redick had a similar complaint. It was moved by Redick, second by Embree to direct the chairman of the ICMAC to write to Crystal -Shamrock Airlines in Minneapolis, advising them that they are creating anxiety in the Iowa City community, and to suggest that they land at Cedar Rapids if possible. It also should be suggested that, when landing at Iowa City, they avoid overflying residential areas. Motion carried, with Embree, Redick, and Saeugling voting aye, Bleckwenn abstained. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES 1101OES a 1' i i i i I I j i I (4) It was moved by Bleckwenn, second by Redick that the ICMAC hold a special meeting at noon at the Iowa City airport on Thursday, September 27, to inspect the physical plant. Motion carried. Redick reported that Ken Lowder has arranged for EPA lawyer Bob Wright to talk to the ICMAC and FAA people about actions that the community can take concerning noise abatement. A tentative date for the meeting has been set for October 11. It was moved by Embree, second by Redick that a Public Information Meeting be held Thursday, September 27, at 700 PM in the Iowa City Civic Center. Motion carried. The meeting adjourned at 10145 PM. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MONIES i i i i I I j i I i I I I ( I 1 It I I i i (4) It was moved by Bleckwenn, second by Redick that the ICMAC hold a special meeting at noon at the Iowa City airport on Thursday, September 27, to inspect the physical plant. Motion carried. Redick reported that Ken Lowder has arranged for EPA lawyer Bob Wright to talk to the ICMAC and FAA people about actions that the community can take concerning noise abatement. A tentative date for the meeting has been set for October 11. It was moved by Embree, second by Redick that a Public Information Meeting be held Thursday, September 27, at 700 PM in the Iowa City Civic Center. Motion carried. The meeting adjourned at 10145 PM. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MONIES . -. Iowa City Airport Commission Master Plan Study Public Information Meeting #3 Na_r Alternatives Iowa City Civic Center - 27 September 79 Airport Commission Members Present: Bleckwenn, Embree, Phipps, Redick, Saeugling Summar of discussion: Phipps called the meeting to order at 7:30PM, and turned the meeting over to Dave Byers, the Master Plan Study (MPS) consultant. Byers stated that the background for the major alternatives came from Phase I of the MPS, e.g, traffic forecasts, airport capacity to accommodate that traffic, and facility require- ments to meet future needs. Byers listed, as major alternatives, (1) no development,(2) obtain a new site, (3) develop existing site. Advantages and disadvantages of each were discussed; Byers recom- mended developing the existing site. He showed plans of the airport, illustrating different improvements, such as new parking areas and taxiways. Byers emphasized that the ICMAC is not obligated to go along with any one of the alternatives. or suggestions for airport improvements; they are simply his own recommendations. He did comment, however, that the FAA would probably not fund much that wasn't on a MPS. Byers then opened the meeting for questions and comments from the public. Barry Ginsberg asked how long it would take to build a new airport. Phipps said that, with all funding immediately available, it would take one year. Ginsberg discussed the possibility of obtaining municipal bonds, and related that to the financing of a new airport, John Nett compared projected uses of airport land with current use. He mentioned that the City could buy land around the airport, and restrict its use. He stated that, on a twenty year scale, the airport, at its present location, would be incompatible with the city of Iowa City, and should be moved. Elliott Full congratulated the Kimball Co. and Mr. Byers on a careful and thoughtful study. He then asked about the financing necessary to buy 'clear zones at the end of the runways. Byers replied that full funding Could be obtained for that. I Mr. Sonnig did not agree that the MPS was either careful or thoughtful. He stated that significant data was witheld. He also stated that local pilots use a particular runway not because of wind conditions, but because of accessibility and convenience. He suggested that merely lengthening runway 6/29 would not guarantee that pilots would use it a good deal of the time. Also, he pointed out that the consultant's suggested taxiways would make 12/30 easily accessible. Mr. Sonnig also discussed the consultant's recommen- dations for new airport locations. Saeugling agreed that there were better sites than those listed in the current phase of the MPs. He commented that, in his opinion, Iowa City needs an airport, and that it should be something more than a patchwork that will, in his opinion, result from the consultant's report. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES (2) Ed Thomas stated that he didn't like the report. He stated that it did not include violations around the current airport facility; specifically, approach clearance over highway 1 and 218. Pete Peterson stated that the report was a good one. He discussed runway extension, and commented that 6/24 was the only logical choice. He had polled former airport commission members, and found that they all agreed that Byers.' third alternative was the practical solution to the difficult problem at hand. He read a paper from the former commission members, concerning the third alternative of improving the current airport. John Redick stated that much data in the report was unsubstan- tiated, but that there were good points made in the study, particularly regarding improvements suggested for the existing airport. He commented that the report did lack environmental impact information. He also discussed runway extension, saying that this would invite jet traffic. In addition, he stated that the report too quickly dismisses the alternative concerning re- locating the airport, which should be seriously considered. Dick Blum, as chairman of Iowa City Planning and Zoning, showed a comprehensive land use map. He showed that new housing was excluded from critical approach and departure paths of the Iowa City airport. He pointed out that no new subdivisions are contemplated along existing approach and departure paths. His personal comments first concerned clarification of Byers' airport plans, and possibilities for future traffic patterns. He then commented that he doesn't think that the noise from airport traffic has gotten worse in the past few years; he stated that it has been improved in the years since United and Ozark left. He stated that can be arranged to bar certain categories of aircraft from certain runways. He also challenged pilots, members of the ICMAC, and local citizens to join him to discuss the impact of aircraft noise on the Iowa City community, and to help find a solution. Barry Ginsberg commented that he would like to see data proving that aviation is necessary for local business. He also discussed whether an increase in business and industrialization would lower property taxes - he thought not. Concerning the U. of Iowa Hospital, yet not reflecting hospital policy, he discussed whether it makes any difference if critically ill patients and transplant organs are brought into the Cedar Rapids or Iowa City airport, before they are transported to the hospital. Ken Lowder stated that if the airport were redeveloped at its present site, and if the city didn't grow and airport traffic increased, the problems of noise and safety would also increase. He remarked that this problem was not addressed in the MPS. Byers replied that this was not in his contract. Lowder asked for evidence that extending runway 6/24 sould decrease or alleviate noise and safety problems for Iowa City. Byers explained that a computer was used for that part of the study, and that it showed a sub- stantial reduction in noise. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOIRES (3) Dale Rockenbrach stated that moving the airport to a new loca- tion should be given serious consideration in the study. He also asked to whom one should complain about an airplane flying to low. Phipps replied that the FAA was the proper agency. Phipps commented that many people had been complaining to the consultant, but that the ICMAC should also accept responsibility for the study. He stated thet when the decision was made to employ the consultant, the runways needed repair. The ICMAC was irformed at that time that in order to receive federal funding, it was necessary to have a MPS. Therefore, the study is a method to get federal and state aid for runway and other airport repairs. Ginsberg commented that the study was too qualitative. Phipps stated that there was presently no funding available for a more quantitative study. Sonnig asked what restricted the study, and how much it cost. Byers replied that his report was outlined in his contract, and that the study cost $32,000. Dick Blum stated that when the concept of a MPS was first presented two years ago, both the City Council and the ICMAC were opposed to moving the airport. Three years ago, the Iowa City Comprehensive Plan Committee looked at alternate sites for the airport, and unanimously advised the ICMAC that the probability of relocating the airport was virtually nil. In addition, he commented that a new airport would invite more jet traffic, and that cities generally tend to expand in the direction of the local airport. E.K. Jones pointed out that the Iowa City Flying Service is one of three companies in Iowa licensed to fly critically ill patients, and that the Flying Service does transport many of them. He also discussed the MPS of 1962. Saeugling stated that the MPS of 1962 did not preclude development near the airport. Embree discussed keeping the airport open at its present site, and and the need for compromise and public input. She commented that the airport's present location was unsuitable for industrial development, because of nearby housing and the high water table. She stated that many local citizens are in favor of airport improvement without runway extension. General diccussion followed. Rockenbrach asked at what level of flight operations would a tower be necessary. Byers stated that Iowa City was nowhere near it. Lowder and Byers discussed the practicality of alternate site selection. Phipps then closed the meeting to public discussion, after asking if there were any further comments. Byers commented that Phase II must be approved before he could continue with the MPS. The possibility of expanding Byers' contract to include additional research of alternate sites was discussed. Embree stated that there sould be four major alternatives, instead of threes (1) no improvement (2) alternate site (3) improve the present airport (4) improve and expand the present facility. General discussion followed. Resurfacing runway 17/35 was also discussed. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOIRES (4) It was moved by Bleckwonn, second by Embree to defer any action this evening, and that the Chairman should set up a working meeting for the ICMAC and Byers so that corrections can be made on Phase II. Motion carried. It was moved by Embree, second by Bleckwenn to go ahead with the application for federal funding for improvement of runway 17/35. Motion carried. Phipps read the list of those who had applied for the position of Airport Manager. Commission members had previously read their applications, and selected their preferred candidates. They collaborated on a list of candidates that everyone thought were especially well-suited for the jobs John Davis Dennis Gordon Ronald Hanelt Ernest Nelson James Wachendorf Garret Winter Fred Zehr Richard Zmolek Phipps commented that the City will send letters to all the appli- cants as soon as the ICMAC indicates those to be interviewed. A letter from the Department of Human Relations concerning such applications was read. The meeting was adjourned at 10s95PM. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOINES w MINUTES IOWA CITY PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION RECREATION CENTER ROOM B SEPTEMBER 12, 1979 MEMBERS PRESENT: Boutelle, Crum, Hillman, Humbert, Berry MEMBERS ABSENT: Thayer, McLaughlin, Hayek, Robertson STAFF PRESENT: Howell, Lee, Showalter SUMMARY OF DISCUSSION AND FORMAL ACTION TAKEN: i The June 13th minutes were approved. i Marilyn Nickelsburg was present to discuss the Chl'ldrens Museum.. She distributed information regarding attendance for the past 3 years and this summers programs. Marilyn feels that it is no longer possible for the Friends to operate the Museum as they have in the past, due to lack of funding. This year, they didn''t open until mid-June and will not be open on weekends this fall, The Museum directors have been working 52 to 70 hours per week, and only getting paid for 20 hours, CETA help is becoming more unreliable. The availability of students for internship from year to year. will vary Showalter asked the Commission if they would like to recommend that funding for Museum operations be included in the FY'81 Recreation operating budget. Lee has a prepared cost estimate of $7,500 for operation on weekends in the spring and fall and 6 days week in the per summer, It would be possible to reduce this some by using interns,etc. Boutelle asked Nickelsburg if the Friends board would still be active, and if they would support and assist in Museum operation, Nickelsburg will meet with the board and report back at the October meeting, I The future of Black Hawk Mini-Park was discussed, Howell and Showalter felt that the Park had been a splendid idea and very successful, but that it was designed as a temparary park, and if kept as a permanent park would require substantial attention, The bricks are settling, causing low spots where water stands in the summer, and freezes in the winter. After considerable discussion it was decided that no recommenda- tion on the future of the park be this given at time. Election of officers. Berry nominated Crum for Chairperson. Unanimous Crum nominated Hillman for Vice Chairperson, Unanimous i The meeting was adjourned at 9:30p.m. f/ Dennis Showalter ! " j 1 � Director-Parks and Recreation �i I I j i i 19�F3 I I MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS-DES 610IIIES MI 2V, MINUTES CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 22, 1979 8:00 AM CIVIC CENTER, CITY MANAGER'S CONFERENCE ROOM MEMBERS PRESENT: Anderson, Nusser, Orelup STAFF PRESENT: Higdon OTHERS PRESENT: Walker, Hearing Officer; Jay Honohan, Attorney for Ronald R. Fort; and two members of the media RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE CITY COUNCIL None RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE CITY MANAGER AND STAFF None RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE CITY ATTORNEY None SUMMARY OF RELEVANT DISCUSSION Chair, Bill Nusser, presiding, called the meeting to order for the specific purpose of considering the information from the public hearing of September 17 which related to the Commission's decision regarding the demotion of Ronald R. Fort and possibly arrive at a decision. No other items are to come before this meeting. Nusser expressed that he did not believe a closed session would be of any, value if each member of the Commission had deliberated over the information individually as he had. Anderson and Orelup agreed that a closed session would not be necessary as there was no information to exchange in a closed session that would be helpful to any of the Commission members. Attorney Honohan was given an opportunity to speak. He addressed some comments to the media stating that he felt his client's rights had been violated by the media flap and Fort was the one who had suffered. He stated that the Commission was acting properly on September 17, the media sneaked out and returned with a xeroxed copy of the open meetings law and this was done only for the benefit of the media. Honohan stated that open meetings are wonderful, we are all for it, but in this instance the media had trampled on a citizen's rights for the sole benefit of the media. Orelup moved that the Civil Service Commission vote to rescind the action of Harvey D. Miller of September 28, 1978 and to reinstate Ronald R. Fort as a sergeant of the Iowa City Police Department effective September 22, 1979. Anderson seconded. The vote was unanimous in favor of the motion. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOINES Civil Service'",mmission September 22, _j79 Page 2 Chair Nusser instructed Walker to prepare the necessary documents for signature. The meeting adjourned at 8:09 a.m. Minutes prepared by June Higdon MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOINES I j N i i I i i j I j r i 1 N it 1j j. I< i l,l ' 1 N I I 'i i MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOINES IOWA CITY HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION September 4, 1979 7:30 PM ENGINFERING CONFFRFNCF. ROOM MEMBERS PRESENT: Braverman, Kuhn, Costantino, Reyes, Munzenmaier, Marcus Yates, McGuire, McCartt. MEMBERS ABSENT: None. STAFF PRESENT: Brown, Morris, Mejia. VISITORS: Woman from radio station not introduced. RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE CITY COUNCIL: None RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE CITY MANAGER AND STAFF: Staff is to prepare a monthly flow chart for complaints. Civil Rights Specialist is to put probable cause or no probable cause at the end of investigative report. Staff is t0 report on the progress of the City as a model employer. SUMMARY OF RELEVANT DISCUSSION: 1. The September 4, 1979 meeting was called to order at 7:30 PM by Chairman Braverman. 2. Committee of Priorities discussed their purpose which was to look at projects outside of what the commission does as a whole and make suggestions for relevant projects. 3. The Human Rights Ordinance was discussed. It was decided that the basic concerns are: A. To look at the ordinance as it pertains to processing complaints. The possibility of hiring an outside consultant to investigate procedures and process was discussed. Who to get to do this was discussed and the fact that the Human Ri0hts Commission does not have a budget was mentioned. B. The question of the Human Rights Commission processing complaints against the city was discussed. C. The possibility of reviewing internally using city staff was discussed. D. As a result of the above discussion, the following motion was made by Munzenmaier and seconded by Kuhn. Motion that the Commission conduct an investigation of the City's Human Rights Ordinance and all promulgations of that ordinance utilizing MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 1401NES 1945 . e Human Rights Commissi,,., September 4, 1979 Page 2 such internal and external resources as are necessary. Areas of concentration shall be: 1• parallel structuring to 601A, 2. jurisdictional authority, 3. procedural aspects. Further, that two commissioners be appointed by the chair to initiate this investigation and monitor its progress and report back to the commission as a whole and formalize final recommen- dations to the commission. 4. As part of the above the possibility of hiring legal independent counsel for the commission in the event of a public hearing was discussed. The motion was made by Marcus and seconded by Braverman that in the event the commission decides to hold its own public hearing, an outside legal consultant will be hired for the interim period of the investigation. The question of this being a simple motion or a bylaws change was brought up. The motion was tabled by a unanimous vote. 5. Discussion of guidelines for processing of complaints. It was suggested that a three month time period be used as a reasonable guide from the time of the complaint to the time the investigative j team receives the report. It was suggested that a status report/ i tracking sheet should be initiated to more closely monitor the Rrocess. The eyes. Motion ftolhave gmotion aspart ofsthe dmonthly e by treport aes and eflow echary t of every complaint beginning with when the complaint is formally filed. specify when the case was received, assigned, went to legal, current status. Motion carried unanimously. 6. Motion was made by McGuire and seconded by Yates that the Director of the Human Relations Department or her designated appointee report on the progress of the City as a model employer at monthly commission meetings (i.e. what kinds of changes are being made to encourage minorities and females). Motion carried unanimously. i 7. Motion was made by McGuire and seconded by Yates that money be approved for ID's for the Commissioners. It was mentioned by Pat Brown that the City has an arrangement with the bank for ID photographs for employees so Commissioners should be able to get IDs there. Motion carried unanimously. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES ., Human Rights Commission September 4, 1979 Page 3 8. Motion made by McGuire and seconded by Yates that the Civil Rights Specialist put the probable cause or no probable cause finding aL the end of the investigative reports. All voted aye except Yates who abstained. 9. It was brought up that what has been learned from Woodfield's in terms of the complaint process and public hearings should be put on the agenda for a future meeting. 10. Motion was made by McGuire and seconded by Yates that the commission hold an open house that is well publicized as a method of letting the public know the commission exists and that this be done some time in October. A Human Rights Day with movies, panels, etc. was suggested. It was decided to find out what is available and go from there in determin- ing a date. A public hearing was suggested. This would be a public hearing on the commission at which minorities, women and handicapped could ask questions, bring complaints and suggestions. Employers could be invited to tell what is wrong with the commissions procedures from their point of view. Original motion withdrawn. Motion made by McGuire and seconded by Yates that a subcommittee be assigned to draw up a tentative program and date for some type of public event. Motion carried unanimously. Braverman appointed Reyes, Marcus, Kuhn and Yates as a subcommittee. Meeting adjourned at 9:00 PM. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOVIES MINUTES IOWA CITY PUBLIC LIBRARY BOARD OF TRUSTEES REGULAR MEETING September 27, I979 Director's Office 3:30 I'M MEMBERS PRESENT: MEMBERS ABSENT: STAFF PRESENT: HANSEN LIND MEYER: OTHERS PRESENT: Summary of Discussion Bartley, Bezanson, Gritsch, Hyman, Immermann, Ostedgaard, Richerson, Zastrow None Eggers, Tiffany, Ingersoll, Kelley, Craig, Jehle Loren Ellarson, John Benz Vawter $ Walter, Inc. - Marshall Winders, Mike Short Modern Piping - Dave Brown Shay Electric - William VanDuyn The meeting was called to order at 3:35 PM by Lynda Ostedgaard. Loren Ellarson, Contract Administrator for Hansen Lind Meyer, led the discussion during the Pre -Construction Conference between the general contractor, subcontractors, Library Board of Trustees and the architects. Ellarson presented 24 points relative to the duties and responsibilities of the general contractor, and his subcontractors, the architects and the Library Board of Trustees during the construction period. Complete minutes of this portion of the meeting will be prepared by Ellarson and will be on file in the Library as an attachment to the minutes of this meeting. The minutes of the Regular Board meeting of August 23; and Special meetings of September 11 and 21 were approved. The disbursements of September 1 and 15 were approved. Zastrow/Bartley. Ostedgaard moved and Immermann seconded the adoption of a resolution to revise the responsibilities and membership of Building Committee N1 and to empower it to serve as the owner's representative at any meeting or for other purposes in behalf of the Library hoar([. The Committee shall consist of the Library Director and three Board members selected by the Board. Any decision by this group must have the concurrence of at least two of its members in attendance at a meeting or who are consulted in advance of a decision. This Committee shall be authorized to take action on behalf of the Library Board in its capacity as owner's representative but in no event shall it authorize any action which will exceed $25,000 in cost without prior Board approval. Unanimous. Richerson moved and Zastrow seconded the adoption of the following resolution: "That the Library Director be authorized to make decisions concerning construc- tion of the library that involve total cost increases on any one item of no more than $2500.00" Unanimous. (over) MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES IdoillES J MINUTES ICPL Board 9-27-79 Page 2 A resolution authorizing the Board President to sign a contract with Te1Com Systems, Inc. for telephone equipment in the new library was approved. Immermann/Ostedgaard. Unanimous. The Board reviewed the draft of goals and objectives for FY1981 and gave tentative approval pending a full budget draft in October. The purchase of two Panasonic Omnivision II NV -8170 1/2" video cassette players from the Gifts and Bequests Fund for $2200 was approved. Immermann/Richerson. Unanimous. These players will be used to meet requests of library users and to allow the library to begin purchasing and circulating this Format. Ilalf-inch video cassettes are highly repre- sented by subjects the library wishes to get under the $16,000 LSCA audio- visual grant, and by entertainment films. There is a strong possibility that this more convenient format eventually can replace 8mm films and the library needs to get experience using it. One player would be used for in-house needs and to train borrowers; the other would be loaned. A proposal to revise reimbursement rates for expenses incurred by library trustees, employees or agents while using private vehicles for library business from 15¢ to 18¢ permile effective immediately and from 18¢ to 20¢ permile effective July 1, 1980 was adopted. Richerson/Hyman. Unanimous. Director's Report: 1) Will have graphics contract and a review of Board's policy on circulation records on the agenda of the October meeting. 2) Reported the City Manager's concern over use of the Storyhour Room as a general meeting room because of its lack of a second exit. 3) Work on the lease with Ilawkeye CableVision has moved slowly because of figures needed from IILM regarding utilities and cost of electrical wiring. q) have asked City Human Relations Director Pat Brown to draw up a list of key personnel functions so that an agreement between city staff and library can be reached on who is responsible for each aspect of library personnel matters. 5) The circulation system is ready to begin Monday, October 1. Over 95% of the collection has been entered. The staff has received many hours of training and is ready to operate the new system. A few people from the temporary con- version staff will be working into October to clean up areas not completed. 6) Shive-Hattery will be hired as the testing agency for the augercast piling, concrete and earth compaction tests. 7) the City will purchase and the project will pay for the all-risk property insurance and liability insurance required by the contract. President's Report: Bezanson appointed himself and Board members Zastrow and Ostedgaard to serve on the newly constituted Building Committee N1. Gritsch will serve as the Board's Collective Bargaining Representative at strategy sessions with the City Council. Bartley, Chairperson of Building Committee a3, urged each Board member to review the list of prospective donors and con- tact her soon about persons they wish to contact. Eggers is preparing a de- tailed list of gift ideas. A general orientation session on the goals of the private funds drive will he held before contacts begin. Meeting adjourned at 6:15 PM. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES NOIRES a I RESOLUTION N0. 79-494 RESOLUTION OF APPROVAL OF CLASSC SUNDAY PERMIT APPLICATION BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF IOWA CITY, IOWA, that a Class C Sunday Permit application is hereby approved for the following named person or persons at the following described location: ASK Co., dba Felix and Oscars, 5 South Dubuque Street Said approval shall be subject to any conditions or restrictions hereafter imposed by ordinance of state law. The City Clerk shall cause a recommendation for approval to be endorsed upon the application and forward the same together with the license fee, bond, and all other information or docu- 1 ments required to the Iowa Beer and Liquor Control Department. It was moved by Balmer and seconded by Erdahl that the Resolution aT read be adopted, and upon roll call there were: AYES: NAYS: Balmer X deProsse X Erdahl X Neuhauser X Perret Roberts X Vevera X Passed and approved this 16th 19_:7-9, Attest: ity Clerk Mayor ABSENT: X day of October , MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES /M? �G J RESOLUTION NO. 79-493 RESOLUTION APPROVING CLASS LIQUOR CONTROL LICENSE APPLrCitTT(fA BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF IOWA CITY, IOWA, that a Class -C Liquor Control License application is hereby approfor the following named person or persons at the following described location: ASK Co., dba Felix and Oscars, 5 South Dubuque Street Said approval shall be subject to any conditions or re- strictions hereafter imposed by ordinance or State law. The City Clerk shall cause a recommendation for approval to he endorsed upon the application and forward the same together with the license fee, certificate of financial responsibility, surety bond, sketch of the premises and all other information or documents required to the Iowa Beer and Liquor Control Department. It was moved by Balmer and seconded by Erdahl that the Resolution as read be adopted, and upon toTI call there were: AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: Balmer x, deProsse X Erdahl X Neuhauser X. Perret X Roberts X Vevera X Passed and approved this 16th day of October , 19 79 Mayor Attest: City Clerk MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOINES I M 11 of 7R4 +`�a�s0 CHW G �° /owA i District 6 Office 430 16th Ave. S.W. Cedar Rapids, IA 52404 Phone: (319) 364-0235 RtCEII'!_Li OCT 5 1919 Aoff V4~ ty, &6eoga& �, The Honorable Robert A. Vevera Mayor of Iowa City City Hall Iowa City, IA 52240 Dear Mayor Vevara: RE: I-80 Liahtina Conversion HIGHWAY DIVISION October 4, 1979 Johnson County REF. No. I-80-6 (81) 246--01-52 79-M-148 This is official notification to your City Council that the Iowa Department of Transportation proposes to let a lighting conversion project on Primary Road No. I-80 through the Cities of Coralville and Iowa City on November 6, 1979. A part of said project lies sodium. within the City of Iowa City and is located at the Dubuque Street Interchange. The existing lights will be converted to high pressure The work will be done in accord with the current Form 810034 "Agree- ment for Primary Road Extension Maintenance and Operation". Pro- ject costs will be paid from the Primary Road Fund and no charges will be made against the City. The neer project is proposed for construction during 1979. Resident 35118818,WwillaadviselYourofhthe conof tractor'sopr telephone number the information is available. Proposed schedule when We would appreciate this project notification being included on your next City Council meeting agenda as a matter of information to the Council members. I If you have any questions concerning this Office as soon as possible in the work involved, please contact changes. order to expidite any possible Yours ry truly, i Robert C. Henely RCH:cmf District Engineer cc Ed Fawkes Office Of Development Support William E. Zitterich Iowa DOT, Ames, IA 50010Iowa Cit COMMISSIONERS Y RME, Iowa DOT JUIES M. BUSKER BARBARA OUNN DONALD K. OAgDNER WILLIAM F. MCOggTH ROBERT RIG City, IA 52240 5faux SM. Cid Ose MA DU Cemr RAplps Melrwe New Hemplpn ALLAN Dubuque BRUCESe VAN GRUFF DuOupue Rep Oak MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS - DES MOINES j I i r of 7R4 +`�a�s0 CHW G �° /owA i District 6 Office 430 16th Ave. S.W. Cedar Rapids, IA 52404 Phone: (319) 364-0235 RtCEII'!_Li OCT 5 1919 Aoff V4~ ty, &6eoga& �, The Honorable Robert A. Vevera Mayor of Iowa City City Hall Iowa City, IA 52240 Dear Mayor Vevara: RE: I-80 Liahtina Conversion HIGHWAY DIVISION October 4, 1979 Johnson County REF. No. I-80-6 (81) 246--01-52 79-M-148 This is official notification to your City Council that the Iowa Department of Transportation proposes to let a lighting conversion project on Primary Road No. I-80 through the Cities of Coralville and Iowa City on November 6, 1979. A part of said project lies sodium. within the City of Iowa City and is located at the Dubuque Street Interchange. The existing lights will be converted to high pressure The work will be done in accord with the current Form 810034 "Agree- ment for Primary Road Extension Maintenance and Operation". Pro- ject costs will be paid from the Primary Road Fund and no charges will be made against the City. The neer project is proposed for construction during 1979. Resident 35118818,WwillaadviselYourofhthe conof tractor'sopr telephone number the information is available. Proposed schedule when We would appreciate this project notification being included on your next City Council meeting agenda as a matter of information to the Council members. I If you have any questions concerning this Office as soon as possible in the work involved, please contact changes. order to expidite any possible Yours ry truly, i Robert C. Henely RCH:cmf District Engineer cc Ed Fawkes Office Of Development Support William E. Zitterich Iowa DOT, Ames, IA 50010Iowa Cit COMMISSIONERS Y RME, Iowa DOT JUIES M. BUSKER BARBARA OUNN DONALD K. OAgDNER WILLIAM F. MCOggTH ROBERT RIG City, IA 52240 5faux SM. Cid Ose MA DU Cemr RAplps Melrwe New Hemplpn ALLAN Dubuque BRUCESe VAN GRUFF DuOupue Rep Oak MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS - DES MOINES October 12, 1979 Richard D. Phipps- Chairman Iowa City Municipal Airport Comm. 825 Normandy Drive Iowa City, Iowa 52240 Iowa City Council Civic Center Iowa City, Iowa 52240 RE: Airport budget Dear Council Members: The Iowa City Airport Commission is in need of additional.funding for fiscal year 1979-80- in the amount of $20,000. This amount is needed for management, transportation, shop set-up etc. I would like a meeting with the Council at your earliest convenience to discuss this matter. FOCT 12 1979 L ABBIE STOLFU:• CITY CLERK Respectfully, A'k Richard D. Phipps Chairman: Iowa City Municipal Airport Commission MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 1401NES i i i I i I i J 1 I� I L. I; r: I c , I s I j October 12, 1979 Richard D. Phipps- Chairman Iowa City Municipal Airport Comm. 825 Normandy Drive Iowa City, Iowa 52240 Iowa City Council Civic Center Iowa City, Iowa 52240 RE: Airport budget Dear Council Members: The Iowa City Airport Commission is in need of additional.funding for fiscal year 1979-80- in the amount of $20,000. This amount is needed for management, transportation, shop set-up etc. I would like a meeting with the Council at your earliest convenience to discuss this matter. FOCT 12 1979 L ABBIE STOLFU:• CITY CLERK Respectfully, A'k Richard D. Phipps Chairman: Iowa City Municipal Airport Commission MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 1401NES CITY OF IOWA CITY CIVIC CE(\]IER 410 E. WASHINGTON ST IOWA CITY IOVVA 52240 (319) 35z! 15C�' October 19, 1979 Mr. Richard D. Phipps, Chairman Iowa City Municipal Airport Commission 825 Normandy Drive Iowa City, IA 52240 Dear Dick: The City Council formally accepted your letter requesting additional funding at its regular meeting on October 16, 1979. It was agreed by Council members that your request should be discussed at a future informal Council meeting and that more specific information regarding that request should be supplied by you prior to that discussion. I ask that you submit to us a more detailed request to include the nature and extent of your present funding deficit, specific purposes for which tives mayexist togadditionallfunding, and perceivedx xconsequences int the aevent that additional funding is not available. This is the same general information we would require of any City department before considering a substantial budget amendment. I The Council will be happy to consider your request after having received and reviewed the above information. You will be notified when the Council is scheduled to discuss your request at an informal session. This will occur on a Monday afternoon and all Commission members are iinvited to attend. Your prompt attention regarding this matter will facilitate our consi- deration of your request. Sinc ly yours, Robert A. Vevera Mayor cc: City Manager Finance Directo City Clerk bc3/14 MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 11011JES f� ZON Downtown Iowa City 't October 16, 1979 To Mayor Vevera and Iowa City City Council: The Downtown Association wishes to express its concern with the negative response expressed by some of the council re- garding a recent proposal from Zuchelli & Associates. This proposal called for a major department store associated with a downtown hotel. While we neither-agree.or disagree with any individual pro- posal, we feel that conceptually, the addition of another major, department store could be a definite benefit to the economic well-being of the community. Iowa City's position in competition with surrounding cities is very definitely affected by the variety, size and number of business outlets in the downtown area. At one time we enjoyed 4 major depart -ment stores - Penneys, Sears,.Younkers, and Wards. The addition of a%3rd department store associated with a hotel on the - Penney,s.lot would still be less than the four we once had The Downtown Association would urge you to reconsider your initial reaction to this 'proposal. This resolution was passed unanimously by the Downtown Association Hoard of Directors which includes small businesses as well as major department stores. Sincerely, CL_ '.A• ca. ow, Presiden D OWN ASSOCIATION RAB/hs Affiliated with the Iowa City Chamber of Commerce MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CCOAR RAPIDS-DLs !10111CS / 95 at I SSP• • 79-2.r. c•1Da1'.LL'�: Ly.'•^';:i:�. A e Bull Date;. CYetoher 2, 1979 I . rvl•rl> 'r1i: lx.sk v: ntL- the ec3dition- u2 the in lore^. C. 1ty is proof " ine:'cect' _ elEorc__cnt D- ..^. L`.' rzz*iCl oedineaces, ead, TIMER %.S: i•�a ca_cit uns ':'CLp_e-:a_led we_e as _xonrle^ce; cni a h aerd to t2 e ci:_,... a ;rho asst zu.z "La sida:..lirs, zcp.r W.ly in the j vali trr, .led aseca c7.osc Co csu:pi s oa Lhe Rant side. TL +rr,CFu ru _z RrssvLD TiiP_2 'r'HE Ul'SlE, V_ --d tha C=TY U77LAi Ot7S and EOUSiI;r, cOrm. 2--te^ C0,11 on the 101•7A CZT"�. COMIUL CO LaiO CC•,9Y IULSLr :C, le.'-.t'?Ld the 5R6V:ELr10t7AL OtllIHLi6•^.LS. E 'I I � i I I /9S3 MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB i CEDAR RAPIDS -DES IIOIIIES RETAKE OF PRECEDING DOCUMENT • JORM MICROLAB TARGET SERIES MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CCOAR RAPIDS•0ES IJo IRES n i BEST DOCUMENT AVAILABLE SSP.•J9-�:� SL]i9i Sa^- by i�4ti;C_ ';C 7!Lll .1: Lac„ _: c a?. cr3iucrce Date: Octoter 2, 1979 LIJr'p sAS: L c3.-.tc_ Zbe Z:,nditiens e1 tk..0 Sa 'S.vc .: C. in %on^. city is pr00E "i�IC Le.. L':i.'iv Cl Oi: C._ �� 0_ 0 _ci:L•Ti£� 0:d.incucazy and, i?dEit,:4: i5:e mz; _!ct p_e-:ail=c cie a sa _.on�rle^ee; c:Z a he and �0 i:hC Cit J.^.:;f3 ;to mutt : C nce SiLC:::111:5� ^_Cp^;-dully is the Wall teat 3 c : urano C:1.030 to ca:pns on the A,ast sir "Tr.TCOi.gv . 4 3i!s*. D ?iiAi TnE GELS°, e.^d tha CITY 7;.E7.AZONS End �DGSZI7G'ccr .t eac ,',a:eot ct37 on the i0v7A CZ?Y COffdCYL to ea:o_ce; or mud:Lr cutea S$0•v.'Lt70 P7ALRll OTidLhCE5: f - ; a . , I. � 9S3 MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -OLS MOJRCS .CIT Y OF CIVIC CENTER 410 E. WASHINGTON ST IOWA CITY IOWA CITY, IOWA 52240 (319) 354.180D TO THE PROPERTY BY THE CITY OF IOWA CITY NAME: F(At, Ro iL sl, c1� ACCOUNT Y: ADDRESS: I I 1119 C. A hearing will be held on Slyd I 9 at �( _aa,m,40a on the assessment of w{n City of Iowa City to the property located at w'-sk I due to o g costs by the the failure of the person in chargoe rol grasses to mow or otherwise cont and weeds. Said amount is $ S '�, and includes 3.00 charge for administrative costs. The service are credited afirst when Payment is received. You may forward payment of the above amount to the City Treasurer in the Department of Finance in the Civic Center, 410 E. Washington Street, Iowa City, Iowa, OR appear before the City Council at the above mentioned time, antOpportunity to respond Purpose presente evidence and argumso that al I entson allissues involved, sues If you do not appear, or payment of the delinquent amunt is not recei costs will be assessed to the property following the scheduled hearing,eas , authorized by City Ordinance M78-2916. If you have any questions regarding this hearing, please contact me at 354-1800, extension 242. i Sincerely, Billie Hauber Weed Official MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 1101nEs CITY OF CIVIC CENTER 410 E. WASHINGTON ST OWA CITY IOWA CITY IOWA 52240 - (319) 35-.1300 70 THE PROPERTY BY THE CITY OF IOWA CITY NAME: $a�a�. l3y«.. �Ac ACCOUNT /: ADDRESS: Mlq 30 W CL.cc_,I„ (Z,,, , C1A%CnC) MIIAOta A hearing will be held on M�__� zc�Ii �4+iq 19-4- at —`L s�Oa•e•/� on thelassessment of mowing costs by the City of Iowa City to the property located at 211 5 F i. ,.� the failure of the person in charge toue to mow or otherwise control grasses and weds. Said amount is ; administrative costs. The service charges are d includes acharge are creditedf first when payment is received. You may forward payment of the above amount to the City Treasurer in the Department of Finance in the Civic Center, 410 E. Washington Street, Iowa City, Iowa, OR appear before the City Council at the above mentioned time, date and place for the purpose of a hearing so that all parties shall have an opportunity to respond and present evidence and arguments on all issues involved. If you do not appear, or payment of the delinquent amount is not received, costs will be assessed to the property following the scheduled hearing, as authorized by City Ordinance 178-2916, If you have any questions regarding this hearing, please contact me at 354-1800, extension 242. Sincerely, Billie Hauber Weed Official MICROMMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES j CITY OF IOWA C ITY CIVIC CENFER • 410 E. WASHINGTON ST IOWA CITY IOWA 52240 (319) 354.18GO j October 16, 1979 i i i To the Honorable Mayor and City Council of Iowa City, Iowa: i I am submitting herewith a list of the delinquent weed control charges; I a description of the premises where such delinquent accounts were I incurred; together with the name of the owner thereof, for certification to the County Auditor to be collected as regular taxes as by statute j provided. A copy of the list is also submitted with a resolution attached, pre- pared for passage, directing certification to the County Auditor. �r j Respectfully submitted, � e .�.J Superintendent Cemetery Forestry FIICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES IdOINES IIS7 .. �i j RESOLUTION NO. 79-496 is RESOLUTION CERTIFYING DELINQUENT WEED CONTROL CHARGES TO COUNTY AUDITOR. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF IOWA CITY, IOWA, that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to certify the if attached delinquent weed control costs to the County Auditor for collection as regular taxes as by statute provided. i It was moved by deProsse and seconded by Roberts i the Resolution be adopted, and upon roll call there were: AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: i, X Balmer X deProsse X Erdahl X Neuhauser X Perret Roberts X Vevera Passed and approved this 16th Day of October, 1979. I` I YO ATTEST: 4cm is 3; a: i? I IiI l; Received & Approvod By The Legal Department 9> 24- 14 AA FIICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAP. RAPIDS -DES MOINES j i i 1 i' i i f J' n r I 1 � I it I f I t' { .t . Delinquent Acct: Sarah Byron McDaniel, 21_ 5 ErCourr; `�a City, Iowa A Owner: Sarah-or-By-ro niel Rm-1439 30 W. Chicago Ave„ Chicago, I11, 60610 Description-: _West -half o Lot 1 in BIack-20-in-East Iowa-in Amount-;-'$30,00 �\ g .tee• t Delinquent Acct: Adli Roushdi, Undeveloped lot west of 528 Washington St, Iowa City, Owner:.. Adli Roushdi, 1119 Woodlark In. N.W. Cedar Rapids, Iowa 52402 Description: Beginning at the S.E. corner Lot 7 Block 40 Original town of Iowa City Iowa; thence North 0"01 West along the East line of Said Lot 7 140,83 feet to the South Line of the CRI and PRR Rroperty; thence South 560 35' West 44,87 feet to a point of curvature; thence South Westerly along a 788,51' Radius Curve concave South Easterly 159,32 feet to the West Line of Lot 6 Block 40; thence South 0'03' East 15,40 feet to the South West corner of Said Lot 6; thence South 8956' East 160,80 feet to the point of beginning, 35.00 e .•-s i° �` r Amount: $ � � ��� ,�. ,c�va�C�C.os 1s. � . i i I /'BEST mcUMENT AVAILABLE MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES IIOIMES i t J' r I it I t' { .t . Delinquent Acct: Sarah Byron McDaniel, 21_ 5 ErCourr; `�a City, Iowa A Owner: Sarah-or-By-ro niel Rm-1439 30 W. Chicago Ave„ Chicago, I11, 60610 Description-: _West -half o Lot 1 in BIack-20-in-East Iowa-in Amount-;-'$30,00 �\ g .tee• t Delinquent Acct: Adli Roushdi, Undeveloped lot west of 528 Washington St, Iowa City, Owner:.. Adli Roushdi, 1119 Woodlark In. N.W. Cedar Rapids, Iowa 52402 Description: Beginning at the S.E. corner Lot 7 Block 40 Original town of Iowa City Iowa; thence North 0"01 West along the East line of Said Lot 7 140,83 feet to the South Line of the CRI and PRR Rroperty; thence South 560 35' West 44,87 feet to a point of curvature; thence South Westerly along a 788,51' Radius Curve concave South Easterly 159,32 feet to the West Line of Lot 6 Block 40; thence South 0'03' East 15,40 feet to the South West corner of Said Lot 6; thence South 8956' East 160,80 feet to the point of beginning, 35.00 e .•-s i° �` r Amount: $ � � ��� ,�. ,c�va�C�C.os 1s. � . i i I /'BEST mcUMENT AVAILABLE MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES IIOIMES i Delinquent Acct: Sarah Byron McDaniel, 21_ 5 ErCourr; `�a City, Iowa A Owner: Sarah-or-By-ro niel Rm-1439 30 W. Chicago Ave„ Chicago, I11, 60610 Description-: _West -half o Lot 1 in BIack-20-in-East Iowa-in Amount-;-'$30,00 �\ g .tee• t Delinquent Acct: Adli Roushdi, Undeveloped lot west of 528 Washington St, Iowa City, Owner:.. Adli Roushdi, 1119 Woodlark In. N.W. Cedar Rapids, Iowa 52402 Description: Beginning at the S.E. corner Lot 7 Block 40 Original town of Iowa City Iowa; thence North 0"01 West along the East line of Said Lot 7 140,83 feet to the South Line of the CRI and PRR Rroperty; thence South 560 35' West 44,87 feet to a point of curvature; thence South Westerly along a 788,51' Radius Curve concave South Easterly 159,32 feet to the West Line of Lot 6 Block 40; thence South 0'03' East 15,40 feet to the South West corner of Said Lot 6; thence South 8956' East 160,80 feet to the point of beginning, 35.00 e .•-s i° �` r Amount: $ � � ��� ,�. ,c�va�C�C.os 1s. � . i i I /'BEST mcUMENT AVAILABLE MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES IIOIMES CITY OF IOWA CIT i CIVIC CENTER 410 E. WASHINGTON ST ION/A CITY IOWA 52240 (319) 35a.180D I NOTICE OF HEARING ON THE ASSESSMENT OF THE COSTS OF WEED/GRASS CONTROL TO THE PROPERTY BY THE CITY OF IOWA CITY NAME: S(rd1n v lay «,% ML 0av\, e.I ACCOUNT N: ADDRESS: Roc r k4-Aq '10 Ul. LIn.cC_,Io Caw.. Lro. Ili u<ais (.0(. 10 A hearing will be held on T%k0gA ,A -, �_, 19 ', at 30a.m./(O. on thelassessment of mowing costs by the City of Iowa City to the property located at 21%5 E ('C)�<-i , due to the failure of the person in charge to mow or otherwise control grasses and weeds. Said amount is $' �_, and includes a $3.00 charge for administrative costs. The service charges are credited first when payment is received. You may forward payment of the above amount to the City Treasurer in the Department of Finance in the Civic Center, 410 E. Washington Street, Iowa City, Iowa, OR appear before the City Council at the above mentioned time, date and place for the purpose of a hearing so that all parties shall have an opportunity to respond and present evidence and arguments on all issues involved. If you do not appear, or payment of the delinquent amount is not received, costs will be assessed to the property following the scheduled hearing, as authorized by City Ordinance #78-2916. If you have any questions regarding this hearing, please contact me at 354-1800, extension 242. Sincerely, Billie Hauber Weed Official i MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES ?101 NES I NOTICE THE CITY COUNCIL OF IOWA CITY IS CONSIDERING APPOINTMENTS TO THE FOLLOWING BOARD: 90ARD_OF APPEALS One vacancy - Unexpired term October 23, 1979 - December 31, 1980 Two vacancies - Three-year terms November 27, 1979 - December 31, 1982 It is the duty of members of the Board of Appeals to hold appeal hearings on matters concerning the uniform building code. Members must be qualified by experience and training to pass upon matters pertaining to building construction. Iowa City appointed members of boards and commis- sions must be qualified electors of the City of Iowa City. The appointment to this Board for the unexpired term will be made on October 23, 1979, at the Council meeting at 7:30 P.M. in the Council Chamb- ers. The appointments for the three-year terms will be made at the November 27, 1979, meeting of the City Council. The actual terms will begin on December 31, 1979. This will allow the appointees an opportunity to attend meetings of the Board of Appeals in order to become familiar with the duties before assuming full responsibilities. Persons interested in being considered for these Positions should contact the City Clerk, Civic Center, 410 East Washington. Application forms are available from the Clerk's office upon request. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOINES 115r RESOLUTION NO. 79-497 _ RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING 771E MAYOR TO SIfN AND THE CITY CLERK TO ATTEST A RELEASE OF A SANITARY SEWER EASERLMIr ON (AT 4 OF EASTUALB MALL, Eastdale the by City of Iowa City was granted a sanitary sewer easement by Eastdale Corporation on November 16, 1976, a portion of which lies on Lot 4 of F:aStdale Mall; and WHEREAS, Eastdale Corporation now desire:; to relocate the portion of the sewer easement on Lot 4 of Eastdale Mall; and WHEREAS, Eastdale Corporation has granted the City of Iowa City a new sanitary sewer easrment on said Lot 4. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF IOWA CITY: 1• That the Mayor be authorized to sign and the City Clerk to at- test an agreement with Eastdale Corporation which releases and abandons that portion of a sanitary sewer easement on Lot 14 of Eastdale Mall. It was moved by galmrr and seconded by Roberts that the Resolution as read be adopted, and upon roll call there were: AYES: NAYES: ABSENT: - x — Balmer x - deProsse x Erdahl x Neuhauser x Perret - Roberts Vevera Passed and approved this 16th day of October uo�PORATE SEAQ ATTEST: �� ` City Clerk 412 t_jr - Mayor MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOVIES FILED : X4144 BOOK, (iE:YLK 191 OCT22 nn 9:24, RecoliDER JOHNSON CO„ IOIYA 1979. I i I ' � I I I i.. I I _I 1 I g i i _1. �I i I I j 1. I f � I I I i i i RESOLUTION NO. 79-497 _ RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING 771E MAYOR TO SIfN AND THE CITY CLERK TO ATTEST A RELEASE OF A SANITARY SEWER EASERLMIr ON (AT 4 OF EASTUALB MALL, Eastdale the by City of Iowa City was granted a sanitary sewer easement by Eastdale Corporation on November 16, 1976, a portion of which lies on Lot 4 of F:aStdale Mall; and WHEREAS, Eastdale Corporation now desire:; to relocate the portion of the sewer easement on Lot 4 of Eastdale Mall; and WHEREAS, Eastdale Corporation has granted the City of Iowa City a new sanitary sewer easrment on said Lot 4. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF IOWA CITY: 1• That the Mayor be authorized to sign and the City Clerk to at- test an agreement with Eastdale Corporation which releases and abandons that portion of a sanitary sewer easement on Lot 14 of Eastdale Mall. It was moved by galmrr and seconded by Roberts that the Resolution as read be adopted, and upon roll call there were: AYES: NAYES: ABSENT: - x — Balmer x - deProsse x Erdahl x Neuhauser x Perret - Roberts Vevera Passed and approved this 16th day of October uo�PORATE SEAQ ATTEST: �� ` City Clerk 412 t_jr - Mayor MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOVIES FILED : X4144 BOOK, (iE:YLK 191 OCT22 nn 9:24, RecoliDER JOHNSON CO„ IOIYA 1979. Passed and approved this 16th day of October , 1979. { i Mayor ATTEST: i !' City Clerk 1 1 � { { RESOLUTION N0. 79-497 i. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO SIGN AND THE CITY CLERK TO ATTEST A RELEASE OF A SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT ON LOT 4 OF EASTDALE MALL. a WHEREAS, the City of Iowa City was granted a sanitary sewer easement I :J by Eastdale Corporation on November 16, 1976, a portion of which lies j on Lot 4 of Eastdale Mall; and WHEREAS, Eastdale Corporation now desires to relocate the portion of the sewer easement on Lot 4 of Eastdale Mall; and i WHEREAS, Eastdale Corporation has granted the City of Iowa City a new sanitary sewer easement on said Lot 4. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF IOWA .. CITY: 1. That the Mayor be authorized to sign and the City Clerk to at- test an agreement with Eastdale Corporation which releases and abandons that portion of a sanitary sewer easement on Lot 14 of Eastdale Mall. - It was moved by Balmer and seconded by Roberts that the Resolution as read be adopted, and upon roll call there were: �.: ...I AYES: NAPES: ABSENT: } X Balmer X deProsse X Erdahl 1 V Neuhauser { .. X_ Perret Roberts f 7 —•X X Vevera Passed and approved this 16th day of October , 1979. { i Mayor ATTEST: i !' City Clerk 1 MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES 7 RECEIVED R APPROVED ll3L Q'P.E LEGAiJ UPAR'TMT, l96 3 { { , a _ I :J MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES 7 RECEIVED R APPROVED ll3L Q'P.E LEGAiJ UPAR'TMT, l96 3 ■ i RELEASE OF EASEMENT Agreement made this 2nd day of October 1979 between Eastdale Corp., an Iowa corporation and the City of Iowa City, Iowa witnesseth: Whereas, on the 16th day of November •1976 Eastdale Corp. granted to the City of Iowa City an easement for a sanitary sewer system recorded in the Johnson County Recorders Office in Book 478 page 309 and described as follows: A 10 foot wide easement, the centerline of which is described as commencing at the SE corner of Section 14, T79N, R6W of the 5th P.M.; thence :forth 310.74 feet along the east line of Lot 2 Ohls Subdivision, Iowa City, Johnson County, Iowa, to the point of beginning; thence S 68 57 40 W, 490.70 feet to the terminal point. Now, therefore, in consideration of the payment of one dollar (1.00) paid by Eastdale Corp. to the City of Iowa City the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, the City of Iowa City hereby releases and abandons to Eastdale Corp. that portion of the easement above described which lies on Lot 4 of Eastdale Mall, with the intention of termination said easement. BEST . AVAILABLE Maeri4VI�_ i Attest • N� City C er• MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 1401IIES j. I ( j i RELEASE OF EASEMENT Agreement made this 2nd day of October 1979 between Eastdale Corp., an Iowa corporation and the City of Iowa City, Iowa witnesseth: Whereas, on the 16th day of November •1976 Eastdale Corp. granted to the City of Iowa City an easement for a sanitary sewer system recorded in the Johnson County Recorders Office in Book 478 page 309 and described as follows: A 10 foot wide easement, the centerline of which is described as commencing at the SE corner of Section 14, T79N, R6W of the 5th P.M.; thence :forth 310.74 feet along the east line of Lot 2 Ohls Subdivision, Iowa City, Johnson County, Iowa, to the point of beginning; thence S 68 57 40 W, 490.70 feet to the terminal point. Now, therefore, in consideration of the payment of one dollar (1.00) paid by Eastdale Corp. to the City of Iowa City the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, the City of Iowa City hereby releases and abandons to Eastdale Corp. that portion of the easement above described which lies on Lot 4 of Eastdale Mall, with the intention of termination said easement. BEST . AVAILABLE Maeri4VI�_ i Attest • N� City C er• MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 1401IIES E Crnnwrs rescrvc! Iho right Lo otic s:Iid strips for purposes which will not inlcrf,•rc wiLh Che City's full enjoyment of the rights hereby granted; provided Lhat grantors shall not erect or con- struct any building or structure, or drill and operate any well, or construct r,ny reservoir or oLher obstruction of said arca, or diminish or substantially add to the ground cover over said pipe lines. Cranlors do hereby covenant with City that they 11-c lawfulI seized and possessed of the real estate above described; that Choy have a good and lawful right to convey it, or any part thereof. The provisions hereof shall insure to the benefit of and bind the successors and assigns of the respective parties hereto, and all covenants shall apply to and run with the land. Dated this a?A149 day of o(fg6W A.D., O oma s ar ee Eastdale CorDnration BY: VLAG.",,Ir // /moi/ it Ronald S. Harding Merrell M. Johnsoy! RUZ100AX i STATE OF IOb'A ) ss: COUNTY OF JOHNSON ) si this day of in i C before sme,aid the i undersigned, a otary Public in an or said`—Co-unty, in said State, personally appeared ( D.. to me personally known, who being by me duly sworn, execute Me' within and fore- going instrument to which this is attached, and acknowledged the execution of said instrument to be his voluntary act and deed. XIANK C. SLADEK l MY W I%N EXPIRES 3 Notary public in and for Johnson County, Iowa STATE OF IOWA ) ss: COUNTY OF JOHNSON ) On this a N day of Pic /qai , before me, the undersigned, a otar Pub is in an - or"s-a`i3'County, in said State, personally appeared ugto•`, H„ �/N4 � to me personnally known, whoand, being by me duly sworn, i say that they are the S PResl'Deair to which this is attached; that sai-'min=� strument was signs on behalf of said corpora 'on by aut ori of its Board of Directors; and that the said Na 01 as such officers acknowledged the execution o sal instrument to be the voluntary act and deed of said corporation, by it and by them voluntarily executed. Notary blic in and for Jongso County, Iowa: MY eoenrmt6s1om empSS 9�30�80 MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 110111ES M .'ER � This agreomrnt, m e and entered into by and etween Eastdale Mall, Inc., and Thomas C. Barbee, grantors, which expression shall include agents or assigns, and the City of Iowa City, Iowa, hereinafter referred to as City, which expression shall include their agents or assigns, witnessth: It is hereby agreed as follows: For the sum of $1.00 plus other valuable consideration, the receipof which is hereby acknowledged, grantor hereby grants and conveys to City an easement for the purposes of replace- ment, maintenance, and use of sanitary sewer mains as the City shall from time to time elect for conveying sanitary sewer with all necessary appliancesand fittings for use in connect- ion with said pipelines, together with adequate protection therefore, as described below: A 10 foot strip of land across Lot 4 of Eastdale Mall Addition, the centerline being described as: i Commencing at the nortwest corner of Lot 4 of Eastdale Mall Addition; thence S 20 9'40" E, 37.8 feet to the point o beginning; thence N 68 57'40" E, 22.1 feet; thence S 4945'00 E, } 75.00 feet; thence N 8030'00" E, 75.00 feet; thence N 68057'40" E, 25.7 feet to the east line of said Lot 4• said point being S 20059'40" E, 14.8 feet of the northeast corner of said Lot 4. i Grantor further grants to City: 1. The right of grading said strip for the full width there- of and to extend the cuts and fills for such grading into I and on said lands along an outside of said line to such an extent as City may find reasonably necessary; 2. The right to support said lines across revines and water- cources with such structures as City shall from time to time elect; 3. The right from time to time to trim and cut down and clear a away any and all trees and brush now or hereafter on said strip and to trim and to cut down and clear away any trees on either side of said strip which now or hereafter in the opinion of the City may be a hazard to said sewer line or may interfere with the exercise of City's rights hereunder in any manner; provided, however, that all trees which City is hereby authorized to cut and remove, if valuable for timber or wood, shall continue to be the property of grant- ors, but all tops, lops, brush and refuse wood shall be burned or removed by City; 4. The right of ingress to and egress from said strips over and across said lands by means of roads and lanes thereon, if such there be; otherwise, by such route or routes as shall j occasion the least practicable damage and inconvenience to grantors; provided that such right of ingress and egress shall not extend to any portion of said lands which is isolated ( from said strip by any public road or highway now crossing ( or hereafter crossing said lands; i 5. The right to mark the location of said strips by suitable markers set in ground; provided that said markers shall be placed in fences or other locations which will not interfere with any reasonable use grantor shall make of said strips. a) City shall not fence strip; b) City shall promptly backfill any trench made by it on said strip and repair any damage it shall do to grantors' private roads or lanes os said lands. c) City shall indemnify grantors against any loss and damage which shall be caused by the exercise of said ingress and egress, construction, and maintenance or by any wrongful or negligent act, omission of City or of its agents or employees in the course of their employment. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOIIIES I 1 t RSOLUI'ION NO. 79-498 RESOLUTION ACCEPTING REALIGNED SANITARY SEWER ON LOT 4 EASTDALE MALL WEIEIOAS, the Engineering Department has certified that the following improvements have been ompleted in accordance with plans and specifications of the City of Iowa City, Sanitary sewer was installed by Knowling Bros. of Iowa City, Iowa, and was placed in the proposed easement on Lot 4 Eastdale Mall. AND WHEREAS, Maintenance Bonds for Knowling Bros. are on file in the City Clerk's Office, NOW THEREFORE BE IT IWOLVED by the City Council of Iowa City, Iowa, that said iaprovenents be accepted by the City of Iowa City. It was moved by and seconded by Neuhauser that the Resolution as A�gtRj; , and upon roll call there were: AYES: X X X X NAYS: ABSENT: X Passed and approved this 16th day of October , 19 79 . Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk Reco-ivod & Approved By TI o Legal Department MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES M0111ES CITY OF IOWA CITY ('IVI(: I .I NII P AIO I WA!;I IINI ,I/ IIT I I()WA (.I I Y I( WA ! ::' 11 113N)3), I I(il 0 ) I ENGINEER'S REPORT October 10, 1979 Honorable Mayor and City Council Iowa City Iowa Dear Honorable Mayor and Councilpersons: I hereby certify that the construction of the improvements listed below have been completed in substantial accordance with the plans and specifications of the Engineering Division of the City of Iowa City. The required maintenance bond is on file in the City Clerk's office. Realigned sanitary sewer on Lot 4 Eastdale Mall as constructed by Knowling Brothers Construction of Iowa City, Iowa. I hereby recommend that the above mentioned improvements be accepted i by the City of Iowa City. Respectfully submitted, Eugene A. Dietz, P.E. I City Engineer i bdw3/9 } j I i i i I MICROFILMED BY ' JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS-DES MOINES 111. i I CZE 4 S X33 5 • IOWA MAINTENANCE BOND /(now all men by Miele presents That KNOWLING BROS. CONTRACTING CO. of Iowa City, Iowa as Principal, and the UNITED FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY, AN IOWA CORPORATION of CEDAR RAPIDS, IOWA, and authorized to do business In the state of Iowa as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto the CITY OF IOWA CITY IOWA in the penal sum of THREE THOUSAND, FIVE HUNDRED SEVENTY FIVE AND NO/100------------------ 3, 575. 00 ------ -3,575.00 ] DOLLARS, lawful money of the United States of America, for the payment of which, well and truly to be made, the Principal and Surety bind themselves, their and each of their heirs, executors, and administrators, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. Signed and delivered this Ilth day of October A. D. 19 79 with Eastdale Corporation, Iowa City, Iowa Whereas, the said Principal entered Into a certain contractJdated the 94th day of i b Septemer — 1979 to furnish all the material and labor necessary for the construction of Sewer Relocation - Lot 4 Eastdale, Iowa City, Iowa, I In conformity with certain specifications; and Whereas, a further condition of said contract Is that the said Principal should furnish a bond of indemnity, guaranteein to remedy any defects In workmanship or materials that may develop in said work with a period of tw years from the date of acceptance of the work under said contract; and Whereas, the said UNITED FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY, of CEDAR RAPIDS, IOWA, for a valuable consideration, has agreed to join with said Principal in such bond or guarantee, indemnifying said CITY OF IOWA CITY. IOWA as aforesaid; Now, Therefore, the Condition of This Obligation Is Such, that If the said Principal does and shall, at his own I cost and expense, remedy any and all defects that may develop In said work, within the period of two (7) years from the date of acceptance of the work under said contract, by reason of bad workmanship or poor material used in the construction of said work, and shall keep all work in continuous good repair during said period, and shall In all other respects, comply with all the terms and conditions of said contract with respect to maintenance and i repair of said work, then this obligation to be null and void; otherwise to be and remain in full force and virtue In law, KNOWLING BROS, CONTRACTING CO, principal i 9y UNITED FIRE & CASUALTY CO PANY / t UND-2055-b By ll/C G Attorne *In -fact and Iowa f�esident Agent MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MDIIIES I TA L„fTED FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY HOME OFFICE — CEDAR RAPIDS, IOWA CERTIFIED COPY OF POWER OF ATTORNEY (Original on file at Home Office of Company — See Certification) KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, That the UNITED FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY,a corporation dulyorganized and existing under the laws of the State of Iowa, and having its principal office in Cedar Rapids, State of Iowa, does make, con. stitute and appoint Patricia R. Zahn, or L, Pieratt, Jr., or David F. Freiermuth, or Theresa Juhl, or Veronica Monaghan, or Lowell Zapf, all individually. of Waterloo, Iowa its true and lawful Attorney(s)-in-Fact with power and authority hereby conferred to sign, seal and execute in its behalf all law- ful bonds, undertakings and other obligatory instruments of similar nature as follows: --Any And All Bonds -- and to bind UNITED FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY thereby as fully and to the same extent as if such instruments were signed by the duly authorized officers of UNITED FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY and all the acts of said Attorney, pursuant to the authority hereby given are hereby ratified and confirmed. The Authority hereby granted shall expire March 1, 1981 unless sooner revoked. This power of Attorney is made and executed pursuant to and by authority of the following By -Law duly adopted by the Board of Directors of the Company on April 18, 1973. "Article V —Surety Bonds and Undertakings.” Section 2, Appointment of Altomay-in-Fact. "The President or any Vic, President, or any other ofile., of the Company, may', from time to time. appoint by written certificates attorneys-in•fact to act in behalf of the Company in the execution of Policies of Insurance, bonds, undertaking. and other obligatory Instrument, of like nature. The signature of any officer autho- nted hereby, and the Corporate seal, may be affixed by facatmue to any power of attorney or spacial power of attornerorca. tilleatlon of either authorised herebyt such signature and seal, when so used, being adopted by the Company as the original signature of such offleer and the original leaf of the ComPmY. to be valid and binding upon the Company with the "Me force and effect as though mmuslly rinsed. Such attorneys-In•heq subject to the limitations set forth in their respective c n iflcats of authority shall have full power to bind the Company by their signature and execution of any such Instruments and to attach the seal of the Company thereto. The President or any Vice President, the Board of Director, or any other officer of the Com- pany may at any time revoke aD power and authority previously given to any attorneyAn•f act. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the UNITED FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY has caused these presents ,nIsCASo".,, to be signed by its vice president and its corporate seal to be hereto affixed this is t �A " CORPOR4fE`= day of March , A.D. 1979 -� SEAL)gc UNITED(FFIIRjE(A{&C�ASSUUALTYC/O`-MPP]�A B State of Iowa, County of Linn, ss: y ice President On this 1st day of March 1979 , before me personally came Richard J. Ehlinger to me known, who being by me duly sworn, did depose and say: that he resides in Cedar Rapids, State of Iowa; that he is a Vice President of the UNITED FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY, the corporation described in and which executed the above instru• ment; that he knows the seal of said corporation; that the seal affixed to the said instrument is such corporate seal; that it was so affixed pursuant to authority given by the Board of Directors of said corporation and that he signed his name thereto pursuant to like authority, and acknowledges same to be the act and deed of said corporation. 1 EA Q. XECRROTN YI COMMISSIOY. E��"I:ES Notary Public M tember 30 1 y My commission expires September 30, 1980 CERTIFICATION I, the undersigned officer of the UNITED FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY , do hereby certify that I have compared the fore• going copy of the Power of Attorney and affidavit, and the copy of the Section of the By -Laws of said Company as set forth in said Power of Attorney, with the ORIGINALS ON FILE IN THE HOME OFFICE OF SAID COMPANY, and that the same are correct transcripts thereof, and of the whole of the said originals, and that the said Power of Attorney has not been revoked and is now in full force and effect. ,pdcfuti nno, In testimony whereof I have hereunto subscribed my name and affixed the corporate seal of the said �a c WPPOA4f[\= s,(seAL P Company this 11th day or October 19 79 ! r I UNO —MA, 8b 4ssistant Secretary MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS - DES 110111ES r CITY OF IOWA CITY CIVIC CENTER- 410 E. WASHINGTON ST. IOWA CITY IOWA 52240 (319) 354.18010 ENGINEER'S REPORT October 10, 1979 /94 . Honorable Mayor and City Council Iowa City Iowa Dear Honorable Mayor and Councilpersons: I hereby certify that the construction of the improvements listed below have been completed in substantial accordance with the plans and specifications of the Engineering Division of the City of Iowa City. The required maintenance bond is on file in the City Clerk's office. Realigned sanitary sewer on Lot 4 Eastdale Mall as constructed by Knowling Brothers Construction of Iowa City, Iowa. t I hereby recommend that the above mentioned improvements be accepted by the City of Iowa City. Respectfully submitted, Eugene A. Dietz, P.E. I City Engineer t bdw3/9 I j 1 f' fr: I i '1 I MICROFILMEO BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 1401 HES /94 . R RESOLUTION NO. 79-499 RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING JUST COMPENSATION FOR ACQUISITION OF REAL PROPERTY FOR THE SOUTH BRANCH RALSTON CREEK STORMWATER DETENTION PROJECT WHEREAS, the City of Iowa City, Iowa, in furtherance of the public welfare, is undertaking a program to alleviate flooding on Ralston Creek; and, WHEREAS, the City of Iowa City, as a part of this flood control program, plans to construct a stormwater detention structure on the South Branch of Ralston Creek; and, WHEREAS, this project requires that the City of Iowa City acquire certain interests in real property; and, WHEREAS, the City of Iowa City has received appraisals and review appraisals concerning the fair market value of these real property interests; and, WHEREAS, the City of Iowa City has reviewed these appraisals and review appraisals, and being familiar with the real property identified therein, desires to establish the Just Compensation for acquisition of these real property interests. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF IOWA CITY, IOWA, that the amounts listed opposite each real property interest described below are hereby declared to be the Just Compensation for the purpose of acquisition of said real property interests. The Staff of the City of Iowa City is hereby authorized to commence negotiations for the purchase of said real property interests and the Mayor and City Clerk are authorized to contract for the purchase of said real property interests. In the event negotiations for purchase are unsuccessful, the Staff is hereby authorized to institute condemnation proceedings for the acquisition of said real property interests. Property Owner Wilfreda A. Hieronymus and Albert N. Hieronymus Real Property Interest Fee title to 35.89 acres from a tract of land located at Scott Boulevard and American Legion Road, and an easement over 6 acres from said tract of land. Just Compensation $258,000 Plum Grove Acres, Inc. Fee title to 18.4 acres from $146,000 a tract of land located at Scott Boulevard and Court Street. John R. Lindemann and Flowage easement for flood $2,000 Geneva E. Lindemann control purposes over approx- imately 3 acres from a tract of land located in Scott Township. Gustav Lindemann and Flowage easement for flood $1,300 Lillian Lindemann control purposes over approx- imately 2 acres from a tract of land located on both sides of Lower West Branch Road in Scott Township. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOVIES /Us -Z- It was moved by HaIMPr and seconded by deProsse that the Resolution as read be adopted, and upon roll call there were: AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: X Balmer % deProsse % Erdahl % Neuhauser _ X Perrot % Roberts % Vevera Passed and approved this 16th day of October 1978 & 4el_4 Mayor ATTEST: ity Cler RECEIVED & APPROVED $X TjIE LEGAL DEP T102 - f MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES M0111ES I I i t I i i I � i i 1 f.. ; I i I I I � i I I -Z- It was moved by HaIMPr and seconded by deProsse that the Resolution as read be adopted, and upon roll call there were: AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: X Balmer % deProsse % Erdahl % Neuhauser _ X Perrot % Roberts % Vevera Passed and approved this 16th day of October 1978 & 4el_4 Mayor ATTEST: ity Cler RECEIVED & APPROVED $X TjIE LEGAL DEP T102 - f MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES M0111ES M4 RESOLUTION NO. 79-500 RESOLUTION AUIMRIZING EXECUTION OF CONTRACT WHEREAS, the City of Iowa City, Iowa, has negotiated a contract with Ads Advertising a copy of said contract being attached to this Resolution and by this reference made a part hereof, and WHEREAS, the City Council deems it in the public interest to enter into said contract _for one year following satisfactory rmmolp}inn of a previous advertisers contract. Said contract allows for placement of up to twenty (20) transit cards for advertising purposes on the inside of each bus operated by the City's Transit System. Advertising rate is $42 per month ofwhich the City $2n dyp r,< $14. r s NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: 1. That the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to execute the Agreement with Ads Advertising 2. That the City Clerk shall furnish copies of said Agreement to any citizen requesting some. It was moved by Balmer and seconded by Neuhauser the Resolution be adopted, and upon roil call there were: AYE S: NAYS: ABSENT• a X Balmer X deProsse qqh Erdahl 4 X Neuhauser x Perret X Roberts X iVevera Passed and approved this 16th day of October 19 79 Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk RECEIVED k BY .Th! LEC41; D 61tT1�N7' MICROFILM MICROFILMED BY F JORM MICROLAB I CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 11011IES / j( 6 - WE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF IOWA CITY, IOWA AND ADS ADVERTISING THE PARTIES The parties to this Agreement are the City of Iowa City, Iowa, 410 E. Washington Street, Iowa City, Iowa (hereinafter referred to as "City") and ADS Advertising, an advertising business owned by Lorraine Sinnard, 1804 Sioux, Waterloo, Iowa 50702. PURPOSE The purpose of this Agreement is to provide a working document between the parties for the placement of transit cards for advertising purposes on the inside of the buses operated by the City's Transit System. TRANSIT CARDS 1. The transit cards to be placed in the Iowa City Transit System buses will be 11" x 17" in size, placed horizontally. 2. Local advertising standards of good taste will apply to all advertising. SALES 1. Ads Advertising shall be the sole and exclusive agent for the City in the promotion, sale, and placement of transit cards into buses operated by the City's Transit System. (20 buses currently, but to include 2 additional buses if added). 2. The City will allow Ads Advertising to place up to 20 cards into each of the buses operated by the City's Transit System. 3. The City shall be permitted to use any advertising spaces on the buses not used by Ads Advertising, for any purpose it deems appropriate. 4. Advertising may be placed by all advertisers on a first-come first -serve basis without regard to race, creed, color, age, sex, or national origin on a non-discrimination basis. No political advertising will be accepted. 5. Advertising may be purchased by advertisers on a monthly or on an extended basis, but so as not to extend beyond October 31, j 1980. ADVERTISING FEES 1. A fee of $42.00 per month will be charged to each advertiser for the placement of one advertisement. For the purposes of this paragraph, one advertisement shall mean the placement of one MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOINES .. . 2 transit card for each advertiser into each and every bus operated by the City. 2. Ads Advertising shall be responsible to the City for the collection of the placement fee from the advertisers. 3. Of each monthly placement fee of $42.00, Ads Advertising shall retain 33 1/3% for operating expenses and shall remit to the City 66 2/3% no later than the 15th of each month for which an advertiser has placed an advertisement and provide a list of monthly advertisers. 4. For any of the 20 spaces that remain unused during any calendar month, neither Ads Advertising nor the City shall be entitled to a fee or any percentage thereof. 5. The transit cards will be placed and replaced during the hours of 5:30-6:00 A.M. and 10:30-12:00 P.M. by the personnel of Ads Advertising only. The City shall be obligated only to inform Ads Advertising of any transit cards that are damaged or need replacement for any reason. 6. The City shall retain the use of five (5) spaces for its own advertising and shall be permitted to use any other unsold spaces. 7. Public service announcements will be placed by the City free of charge up to a maximum of three (3) spaces per bus. The City may use any or all of its five (5) spaces for this type of message. TERMS 1. The terms of this agreement shall be from November 1, 1979 to October 31, 1980. 2. This contract shall be renewed automatically for successive calendar terms, and shall remain in effect until termination by either party upon 30 day written notification. 3. In the event that this contract is terminated by either party, Ads Advertising shall nevertheless have the right to complete any advertising contract that it has entered into. Dated this 16th day of October , 1978. THE CITY OF IOWA CITY, IOWA: IN -BUS ADVERTISING: BY: C �1�`C( L/��Gtr� BY: Iml GQ Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORMBECE.IVED A APP'InvRn BY .THE LEGAL E? 1Tl1EgT FIICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES I .. _-.1'-wj I AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF IOWA CITY, IOWA AND ADS ADVERTISING THE PARTIES The parties to this Agreement are the City of Iowa City, Iowa, 410 E. Washington Street, Iowa City, Iowa (hereinafter referred to as "City") and ADS Advertising, an advertising business owned by Lorraine Sinnard, 1804 Sioux, Waterloo, Iowa 50702. PURPOSE The purpose of this Agreement is to provide a working document between the parties for the placement of transit cards for advertising purposes on the inside of the buses operated by the City's Transit System. TRANSIT CARDS I. The transit cards to be placed in the Iowa City Transit System buses will be 11" x 17" in size, placed horizontally. 2. Local advertising standards of good taste will apply to all advertising. SALES 1. Ads Advertising shall be the sole and exclusive agent for the City in the promotion, sale, and placement of transit cards into buses operated by the City's Transit System. (20 buses currently, but to include 2 additional buses if added). 2. The City will allow Ads Advertising to place up to 20 cards into each of the buses operated by the City's Transit System. 3. The City shall be permitted to use any advertising spaces on the buses not used by Ads Advertising, for any purpose it deems appropriate. 4. Advertising may be placed by all advertisers on a first-come first -serve basis without regard to race, creed, color, age, sex, or national origin on a non-discrimination basis. No political advertising will be accepted. 5. Advertising may be purchased by advertisers on a monthly or on an extended basis, but so as not to extend beyond October 31, 1980. ADVERTISING FEES I. A fee of $42.00 per month will be charged to each advertiser for the placement of one advertisement. For the purposes of this paragraph, one advertisement shall mean the placement of one MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES 2 transit card for each advertiser into each and every bus operated by the City. 2. Ads Advertising shall be responsible to the City for the collection of the placement fee from the advertisers. 3. Of each monthly placement fee of $42.00, Ads Advertising shall retain 33 1/3% for operating expenses and shall remit to the City 66 2/3% no later than the 15th of each month for which an advertiser has placed an advertisement and provide a list of monthly advertisers. 4. For any of the 20 spaces that ramain unused during any calendar month, neither Ads Advertising nor the City shall be entitled to a fee or any percentage thereof. 5. The transit cards will be placed and replaced during the hours of 5:30-6:00 A.M. and 10:30-12:00 P.M. by the personnel of Ads Advertising only. The City shall be obligated only to inform Ads Advertising of any transit cards that are damaged or need replacement for any reason. 6. The City shall retain the use of five (5) spaces for its own advertising and shall be permitted to use any other unsold spaces. 7. Public service announcements will be placed by the City free of charge up to a maximum of three (3) spaces per bus. The City may use any or all of its five (5) spaces for this type of message. TERMS I 1. The terms of this agreement shall be from November 1, 1979 to October 31, 1980. i 2. This contract shall be renewed automatically for successive calendar terms, and shall remain in effect until termination by either party upon 30 day written notification. 3. In the event that this contract is terminated by either party, Ads Advertising shall nevertheless have the right to complete any advertising contract that it has entered into. Dated this 16th day of October , 1978. THE CITY OF IOWA CITY, IOWA IN -BUS ADVERTISING: BY: . 44* �✓,.kL BY: 1Y LGr Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORMRECE.IVF;D 3 apannVgn MY ,TIM LEGAL E? TIO f1T MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES ■ . a s City of Iowa City MEMORANDUM DATE: October 12, 1979 TO: City Council FROM: Larry Chiat, Acting Development Coordinator= f-40 RE: Resolution Establishing Just Compensation for Acquisition of Real Property for the South Branch Ralston Creek Stormwater Detention Project Pursuant to Council Resolution 79-99, adopted on March 6, 1979, the Development Division initiated land acquisition procedures for the South Branch Ralston Creek Stormwater Detention project. To date, this has included obtaining appraisals and review appraisals on the four project parcels and sending preliminary acquisition notices to the four property owners. Since this project is receiving Community Development Block Grant funding, the City is subject to HUD's acquisition regulations. In order to proceed further with land acquisition activities, the City must act to establishtheamounts believed to be -just compensation for the real property interests to be acquired. The amounts stated in the accompanying resolution are those determined by the City's appraiser and approved by the City's.review appraiser. Staff recommends that these amounts be adopted by the Council as just compensation for the real property interests specified in the accompanying resolution. After just compensation is established, the staff will then commence negotiations for the purchase of the specified real property interests. LC/ssw MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOVIES /965 { I l f L I jj I 1' i s City of Iowa City MEMORANDUM DATE: October 12, 1979 TO: City Council FROM: Larry Chiat, Acting Development Coordinator= f-40 RE: Resolution Establishing Just Compensation for Acquisition of Real Property for the South Branch Ralston Creek Stormwater Detention Project Pursuant to Council Resolution 79-99, adopted on March 6, 1979, the Development Division initiated land acquisition procedures for the South Branch Ralston Creek Stormwater Detention project. To date, this has included obtaining appraisals and review appraisals on the four project parcels and sending preliminary acquisition notices to the four property owners. Since this project is receiving Community Development Block Grant funding, the City is subject to HUD's acquisition regulations. In order to proceed further with land acquisition activities, the City must act to establishtheamounts believed to be -just compensation for the real property interests to be acquired. The amounts stated in the accompanying resolution are those determined by the City's appraiser and approved by the City's.review appraiser. Staff recommends that these amounts be adopted by the Council as just compensation for the real property interests specified in the accompanying resolution. After just compensation is established, the staff will then commence negotiations for the purchase of the specified real property interests. LC/ssw MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOVIES /965 MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB :IPAP° anri:)s.;ii luI!If 1, _a 1 i I I I I ' I I i I1 i i 1 i i i City of Iowa Cit-• r-_ MEMORANDUM DATE: October 12, 1979 TO: City Council FROVN: City Manager RE: Material in Friday's Packet Memorandum from the City Manager regarding housing code. Memorandum from the Director of Housing and Inspection Services regarding �� rezoning of future public housing sites. Memorandum from the Broadband Telecommunications Specialist regarding cable update. Memorandum from the City Attorney regarding proposed rental of office space. Memoranda from the Department of Public Works: a. Discussion date for Block 64 Parking Garage b. Bus route changes Letter from the University of Kansas expressing compliment downtown pedestrian mail, s regarding the Correspondence from the U.S, Department of Commerce to the Regional Planning 97� Commission regarding SMSA status. Correspondence from IDOT to the Regional Planning Commission regarding SMSA status. Memoranda from the Regional Planning Commission; a. Suggestions concerning future planning programs, problems and needs / b. Agency information - Update on remainder of budget hearing schedule -ZZO Brochure regarding Community Technology Initiatives Program Articles: a• "Let's Get Rid of 'The Girl"' b."The Hawkeye Pride - Iowa City Transit System" c. "Vying for Viewers" /9 D TheBuild�Line, October 1979 Memo from Parks and Rec. Director re Cemetary wall. Agenda of Properties and tour information for Council House Violation tour. Material distributed by Protective Assn. of Tenants re house violations. �-- — MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINFS City of Iowa City MEMORANDUM DATE: October 11, 1979 TO: Ci Council FROM: Ci Manager RE: Housing Code Enclosed are several memoranda concerning housing code enforcement. The staff has identified solutions for the concerns which owners, operators, and tenants have expressed to the City Council, City Manager and staff. As we visit properties on Monday, it is hoped that consideration will be given to the alternatives so that a consensus for resolution of the problems can be reached at an early date. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOINES 4967 I I 1 ' 1 1 I � i i i 1 jI i is f. / _i If I i 1 i I, � City of Iowa City MEMORANDUM DATE: October 11, 1979 TO: Ci Council FROM: Ci Manager RE: Housing Code Enclosed are several memoranda concerning housing code enforcement. The staff has identified solutions for the concerns which owners, operators, and tenants have expressed to the City Council, City Manager and staff. As we visit properties on Monday, it is hoped that consideration will be given to the alternatives so that a consensus for resolution of the problems can be reached at an early date. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOINES 4967 i i f 1 i I i 1 f i i i City o9 Iowa C6_y Date: October 11, 1979 To: City Manager and City Council From: Michael E. Kucharzak, Director Re: Housing Code Enforcement This memorandum is meant to be an overview of the policies, procedures, enforcement problems, code conflicts and administrative decisions regarding the administration of the Housing Occupancy and Maintenance Code. This memorandum is also designed to serve as a cover memo to a report comparing the State Housing Code and the Housing Occupancy and Maintenance Code and is hopefully an answer to some of the questions that have recently arisen due to the code enforcement activities of recent months. ANNUAL INSPECTIONS AND LICENSING Iowa law requires that all multiple dwellings be inspected annually. The Housing Occupancy and Maintenance Code as adopted by Council, requires that multiple dwellings and rooming houses be inspected annually and receive a rental permit. Owner/operators are notified by mail 60 days prior to the expiration date of their current housing permit and by this notice are invited to make an appointment for the annual licensing inspection. The letter is accompanied by a permit application and a request for inspection card that can be completed by the operator and mailed back to the City. The owner/operator has to remit the application fee along with the completed permit application to start the licensing process. Upon scheduling the annual licensing inspection, the inspector surveys the entire building and verifies the area being licensed to the floor plans on file in the City office. These floor plans were completed on the majority of licensed structures during 1978-79 and while providing a verification that room sizes and window sizes are in accordance with the code, they also provide a valuable record of the actual portions of the building under license. All inspections by the Housing Inspector are conducted as official business by the City. ORDERS AND EXTENSIONS Upon completing the survey, the housing inspector either issues the housing permit or a notice for the violations requiring correction. Unless the violations are of an emergency nature or requiring immediate attention for seasonal or other reasons, the property owner normally receives 90 days to make the necessary corrections on the property. The housing inspector is obligated to perform reinspections to assure that the building is indeed brought into compliance with the code within the prescribed time. This reinspection process is carefully monitored through a system of dated file reminders to assure that the City's MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MONIES 2 liability under Iowa tort liability law is not neodlessly extended due to administrative or clerical oversights. Only when an employee exercises due care in executing statutory duties is the municipality exempt from liability. As the work progresses, the housing inspector has the authority to allow extensions of one half of the previous time period allowed to make the corrections. Thus, a 90 -day order can, upon reinspection, be extended another 45 days, and if additional work is done at that time, an extension can be made of 23 days. This extension process will continue, as long as a good faith effort is being made by the owner to bring the property into code, until time runs out. At that time the housing inspector is obligated to refer the case to the senior housing inspector with a recommendation for placard and condemnation of the building, rent withholding and/or court. The end goal of all actions of the department is compliance with the Code, not penalization to the owner/operator. APPEAL L RIGHTS Also required under State law and the City of Iowa City Housing Occupancy and Maintenance Code, is the right to appeal the order issued by the housing inspector. This right to appeal is stated on the written order and once exercised, stops the clock in effect, by staying all further action until such time as the appeal is heard and'a decision is made by the Housing Appeals Board. EMERGENCY ORDER To deal with items of a more serious nature, an inspector may issue an emergency order which follows the above procedures except that an emergency order may not be written for more than 15 days and the right to appeal does not stay action required to repair the defect and thus remove the hazard. Emergency orders are designed to deal with hazardous electrical, plumbing and heating problems and nuisance complaints such as garbage and refuse disposal, pest infestations and unsanitary maintenance. RENT ESCROW Rent escrow is not an item of the State Housing Code but has been included by the City Counci to provide a tool to achieve compliance. Rent escrow procedures are normally initiated when there has been an obvious disregard for the order as evidenced by a recalcitrant property owner and a lack of a good faith effort to comply with that order. Rent escrow is undertaken by having the City housing inspector declare the building as eligible for rent escrow and by notifying the owner and tenants of this eligibility. The code then requires the tenants to initiate the rent escrow by exercising their legal rights to open up an escrow account at a local lending institution to serve as a depository for the rent. With proper documents recorded at the court house, the Housing Inspector then certifies the building under Rent Escrow. The City housing inspector is MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES IIOIIIES then obligated to notify the escrow agent and the parties affected when the building complies with the Housing Code. RECENT PROBLEMS The current staffing of the Housing Inspection Division including a new supervisor, has caused a restructuring of administrative procedures which, while providing accurate interpretation of the Housing Code as evidenced by actual field inspections, has resulted in the uncovering of a variety of violations that have existed for a long period of time, often on buildings that have been approved by housing inspectors in the past. This, of course, results in a rather frustrating situation on the part of the public finding themselves in a situation of violation. It also makes for a difficult enforcement role for the inspectors, who are properly administering the code and yet receiving a great deal of criticism for being "too strict." The majority of the violations being uncovered deal with ceiling height 1 requirements, lack of minimum window requirements and improper handrails and guardrails. All of the aforementioned violations are items which can be shown to be in violation with the use of a tape measure. Previous inspection policies did not require inspectors to take field measurements and therefore caused a lot of violations to go unnoticed. BOARD OF APPEALS The situation is further complicated and becomes even more frustrating to A the administration of the division when no relief can be granted in the form of a hearing or appeal on items that are part of the State Housing Code. This means that ceilings that are less than the 7'6" requirement or windows that fail to provide the minimum amount of light and ventilation according to the code cannot be exempted in any way by the staff or the Housing Appeals Board since exemptions and variances are specifically prohibited by State law. This does not prevent the City Council from providing a mechanism for granting exemptions or completely eliminating code sections that are not spoken to in the State law. For example, the State Housing Code does not have a handrail and guardrail requirement. The Iowa City Housing Occupancy and Maintenance Code does have specific requirements for guardrails and handrails which, at the request of the Building Board of Appeals, was taken from the Uniform Building Code and, with the endorsement of the Housing Commission and the City Council, was i made the law for existing buildings. This same philosophy also affects the requirements for storm windows, smoke detectors, light switches, and tenant/landlord checklists. PUBLIC RELATIONS It has been brought to the attention of the supervisors that there have been complaints regarding the attitude and/or diplomacy of the housing j inspectors. Comment has been made that other law officers such as police officers use discretion when enforcing the code. We all know that a MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOINES a Police officer will not give you a ticket for driving 31 miles per hour in a 30 mph zone. Housing Inspectors do not have such discretion since the Code requires that "upon determination that all applicable provisions of the Housing Code and of any rules and regulations adopted pursuant thereto, and other applicable codes of the City of Iowa City, Iowa have been complied with by the operator, the Department of Housing and Inspection Services shall issue a rental permit for said specific dwelling or dwelling unit." To use our automobile analogy, we are not talking about moving violations, but conditions similar to the regulations requiring state inspections of automobiles prior to sale; if you have defects in your car you will not get a white title. Annual licensing inspections with a code that is going through several changes and experiencing growing pains can be extremely taxing to the relationships with the public and internally with the staff. Cognizant of the debilitating effect a day -in and day -out involvement with the Housing sessions toe can ve on refreshethesknowledgethe thatethetilnspectoent rscts havengainedrandito f provide educational opportunities to reinforce the health safety aspects of the code. This alone, while improving the abilities of the inspectors, i cannot alleviate the frustrations recognition of a code that does not permit a of the fact that hardships are readily created through its enforcement and its blatant absence of any means for granting relief in ' those cases where special or unusual circumstances warrant such relief. a Since we have shared the problem, we feel obligated to offer a possible solution to the inability to use discretion. Perhaps the Code could be reworded so that certain items dealing with life. safety and the State Code could be grouped into a section that would become mandatory prior to issuance of a license. Other code items such as nuisance items, garbage, rubbish and the like, could be separated from the license requirements. 5 Of course, the inspector would be obligated to enforce the code items not part of the license but would be able to pursue their corrections without 5 holding up the license or suspending a license once issued. it The Director of the Department of Housing and Inspection Services was hired in 1977 to administer the department, in part, due to the fact that he possesses some 17 years of experience in the administration of housing codes. It should be noted that much of the experience gained dealt with Iowa cities and while few are aware of the state housing law, none, to my knowledge, enforce the law to the levels expected in Iowa City. It is not ;+ uncommon for cities in Iowa to have housing appeals boards that grant consideration and relief to prope corrected wrty owners having violations that cannot be readily ithout creating hardships as long as those I violations do not affect the health and safety of the occupants. Many cities in Iowa have chosen to adopt the Uniform Housing Code and have disregarded the State Housing Code. I do not wish to encourage the MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES IIOIIIES L 5 /11 breaking of any law, however, it should be noted that a strict adherence to an obsolete and callous state ordinance is the bases for the problems and frustrations being experienced here in Iowa City in our good faith attempt to provide decent, safe and sanitary housing. The staff in the Department of Housing and Inspection Services shall and continues to carry out the directives of the Council as provided in the ordinances it adopts. I can assure the Council, the Manager and the general public that our goal to serve and to administer the code equally to all has been foremost in our objectives. bj/sp MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 110IRES City of Iowa Cit" MEMORANDUM Date: October 10, 1979 To: Michael E. Kucharzak, Neal G. Berlin and City Council From: Terry Steinbach, Senior Housing Inspector Re: State Housing Code The following is an examination of the State Housing Code; Section 413 of the Code of Iowa, 1979 edition. This examination relates to the Uniform Building Code which the State of Iowa has adopted as the standard of specifications used for new construction. Comparisons are also made of the Iowa City Housing Code, Chapter 17 of the Code of Ordinances of Iowa City. The purpose of this analysis is to show the inconsistencies and irrelevancies of the State requirements as they apply to everday building and housing inspection. Some of the State housing requirements are quite outdated and a thorough review of the State Code is needed to ensure a standard for dwelling units which is consistent with the standard of living of the residents of Iowa in the 1970's and 1980's. It is the feeling of this department that due to the inconsistencies of the State adopted codes, that the State Housing Code, Section 413 be repealed. The Uniform Housing Code, 1979 edition, is written in combination with the Uniform Building Code which the State has adopted. It is this department's feeling that the Uniform Housing Code would fill the void left by such a repeal, without creating any further incon- sistencies between the two adopted codes. The following analysis has been kept as brief as possible in order that the broadness of the problem can be recognized. Some of the following State Housing Code sections are followed by personal comments regarding enforcement, and others are followed by Uniform Building Code sections in order that the direct inconsistency may be shown. The enforcement of one set of standards, rather than two or three, would eliminate many problems in enforcement of the Housing Code and eliminate many problems in the creation of Housing Code requirements. It must also be mentioned at this time that the State Housing Code leaves no avenues open to grant variances to specific requirements. Chapter 413.9, Minimum Requirements - Power of Cities. "...No ordinance, regulation, ruling or decision of any municipal body, officer or authority shall repeal, amend, modify or dispense with any of the said minimum requirements laid down in this chapter, except as specifically provided herein." The Uniform Housing Code allows an appeals Board the discretion that has not been given them in the State Housing Code. Further, it should be noted that in Chapter 413.11, Application of Provisions, "Provisions of this chapter in conflict with the State Building Code shall not apply where the State Building Code has been adopted, or when the State Building Code applies throughout the State." bdw2/10 MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES IIOIRES n A. P9. 2023, #413.3 DEFINITIONS 5. Family Occupancy For the purposes of this chapter, a "family" is a group of persons living together, whether related to each other by birth or not, and may consist of one or more persons. Comment: Definition is so vague and unrestricted that it permits dwellings to be overcrowded by often non -related groups of people. Proposed Change: 5. Family Occupancy For the purpose of this chapter, a "family" shall mean one person or two (2) or more persons related by blood, marriage, adoption, placement by a governmental agency, social service agency, or a family may consist of two (2), but not more than twelve (12) persons not related by blood, marriage or adoption, occupying a living unit as an individual, housekeeping organization. Pg. 2026, #413.13 REAR YARDS Immediately behind every single and two family dwelling hereafter erected there shall be, except as hereinafter provided, a rear yard extending across the lot, for a distance equal to at least one width of the dwelling. Such yard shall be open and unobstructed from the ground to the sky. Every part of such yard shall be directly accessible from every other part thereof. The depth of said yard shall be measured at right angles from the rear lot line to the extreme rear part of the dwelling. Such rear yard space shall in no case be less than ten feet deep, and two feet additional for each story of the dwelling on said lot above the first. An irregular shaped lot, or lot subject to building line restrictions, may be occupied by a dwelling without complying with the provisions of this section, if the total yard space equals that required by this section. Comment: "Open and unobstructed" yard space is ambiguous. Does this prohibit the installation of temporary storage sheds, play equipment, etc.? Does it also create a problem in the installation of tall fences around gardens? The local Zoning Code and/or State Zoning Code might be a better instrument to regulate lot size and use. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES I 2 C. Pg. 1912 #413.20 WINDOWS In every dwelling hereafter erected every room shall have at least one window opening directly upon the street or a public way or other public space which measures fifteen feet in width, or upon a yard or court of the dimensions specified in this chapter, and located on the same lot, and such window shall be so located as to properly light all portions of such rooms. This provision shall not, however, apply to rooms used as kitchens, art galleries, swimming pools, gymnasiums, squash courts or for similar purposes, provided such r000ms are adequately lighted and ventilated. For purposes of this section, adequate ventilation may be either a system of mechanical ventilation which provides not less than 15 interchanges per hour or natural ventilation as specified in Section 413.21; and further, for purposes of this section adequate light may be either a system of artificial light which provides healthful and sanitary conditions in all spaces of the room or natural light as specified in Section 413.21. I Comment: i This language conflicts with the State Building Code which defines a public way as space greater than 10' in width. Clarification of language would certainly eliminate the ambiguity as to the window requirement. Furthermore, according to my calculations, a reasonable requirement for adequate mechanical ventilation would be five (5) air changes per hour rather than fifteen (15). D. Pg. 1912, #413.25 WINDOWS IN BATHROOMS 1 in every dwelling hereafter erected, every water closet compartment I and every bathroom shall have an aggregate window area of at least four square feet between stop aids opening directly upon the street, or upon a yard or court of the dimensions specified in this chapter. Every such window shall be made so as to open in all its parts. Nothing in this section contained shall be construed so as to prohibit a general toilet room containing several water closet f compartments separated from each other by dwarf partitions, provided such toilet room is adequately lighted and ventilated to the outdoor air as above provided, and that such water closets are supplemental to the water closet accomodations required by the provisions of Section 413.32. The above provisions shall not apply to hotels or dwellings that have a system of forced ventilation so constructed as entirely to change the air in every bathroom, every seven minutes. toilet room or water closet compartment I j Comment: In calculating the normal size of bathrooms and the standard air flow Of most commercially available vent fan systems, it would be much more realistic to require that a complete air change in a bathroom I� I should only take place every twelve minutes. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB iCEDAR RAPIDS -DES 1401PIES a 3 E. P9. 1911, #413.14 BUILDING TO SIDE LINE OF LOT - SIDE YARDS Dwellings hereafter erected may be built up to the side lot line, if the side wall is without windows, or if with windows the air and light required by this chapter are provided otherwise than by windows on the lot line, or if the side lot line abuts on a street or alley. If, however, any side yard is left, it shall be open and unobstructed from the ground to the sky, and its width shall be proportionate to the height of the dwelling, and no side yard shall be less in width in any part than as follows: 1. Multiple Dwelling. In the case of all multiple dwlelings hereafter erected, one story in height and having a side yard, the width of the side yard measured to the side lot line shall be at least four feet, and such side yard shall be increased in Width by one foot for each additional above the first. 2. Private Dwellings and Two-Famil Dwellings. In the case of private dwellings and two-family dwellings In erected, one story or two stories in height, the width of the side yard measured to the side lot line shall be at least four feet; such side yard shall be increased in width one foot for each additional story above the second. 3. Distance Between Buildings on the Same Lot. Where more than one dwelling is erected upon the same lot, the distance between them shall not be less than eight feet in the case of dwellings i of one or two stories in height, this distance to be increased two feet for each additional story above the second. i Comment: These items might be addressed better in a state or local zoning ordinance. F. Pg. 1911, #413.15 COURTS - SIZE OF The size of all courts in dwellings hereafter erected shall be proportionate to the height of the dwelling. No court shall be less than any part than the minimum sizes prescribed in this section. The minimum width of an outer court for a one-story dwelling shall be five feet, for a two-story dwelling six feet, for a three-story dwelling seven feet, and shall increase one foot for each additional story above three stories. The least dimension of an inner court shall never be less than twice the minimum width prescribed by this section for an outer court. The width of all courts adjoining the lot line shall be measured to the lot line and not to an opposite building. Comment: From a residential viewpoint, the construction of courts has been rare for the last 20 years and these requirements are addressed in Section 1306C of the Uniform Building Code. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MONIES ■ 4 G. �. 1119 #413.16 COVERED COURTS i No court of a dwelling hereafter erected shall be covered by a roof Or Skylight. Every such court shall be at every point open IroBi the ground to the sky unobstructed; except that in the case of hotels, courts may start on the floor level of the lowest bedroom story, and in the case of other multiple dwellings where there are stores or shops on the lower story or stories, courts may start at the top of such lower story or stories. Comment: This requirement should be introduced into a building code. H. PA. 1911, #413.17 AIR INTAKE In all dwellings hereafter erected every inner court extending through more than one story shall be provided with a horizontal intake at the bottom. air Comment: The Building Code Section 1306C. states the same requirement in more specific terms. I. Pg. 19111 #413.18 CORNERS OF COURTS Nothing contained in the foregoing sections concerning courts shall be construed as preventing the cutting off of the corners of said courts. Comment: ! This requirement should be in a building code, however, it is probably quite obsolete. J. Pg. 1912, #413 23 HEIGHT OF ROOMS r No room in a dwelling hereafter erected shall be in an y part les ! than seven feet high from the finished floor to fininshed ceilings; 1 i the average height of any such room shall not be less than seven feet i six inches, accept that an attic room used for living purposes in a private or two-family dwelling need be seven feet six inches in one- half its area and that areas less than five feet shall not be I considered as a part of the required room area. s Comment: The former Senior Housing Inspector has stated that "Numerous occupied units have been erected subsequent to this code which do not meet the seven feet, six inch average. Enforcing this code could require vacating 100 to 200 units in Iowa City." This inspector feels that there could be some sort of happy medium which would still i afford the safety needed to satisfy the intent of this code. It could be a dated or limited grandfather clause. I MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 140IIICS 5 It should also be noted that this requirement is currently being enforced and appeal statistics show that said enforcement is creating quit, a hardship on owners or oreraLors. the corrections necessary to meet the rpquirpmpl, of l.he osto(iof making those cases where the decision to make corrections has been made, create a hardship and eventually that cost is passed on to the tenants. Other solutions result in the units being vacated or a change in use. Many of the units being vacated are otherwise quite livable dwellings. K. Pg. 1913 BASEMENT OR CELLAR UNDER ENTRANCE FLOOR Every dwelling hereafter erected shall have a basement, cellar or excavated space under the entire entrance floor, at least three feet in depth or shall be elevated above the ground so that there will be a clear air space of at least 18 inches between the top of the ground and the floor joists so as to insure ventilation and protection from dampness; provided, however, that cement floors may be laid on the ground level if desired. i Comment: This requirement is dealt with in Sections 2517(c)2 and 2517(c)6 of the Uniform Building Codewith much more applicable language being used there. I would suggest that this section be dropped from Chapter 413. I L. Pa. 1914, 8413.38 STAIRS IN TWO-STORY MULTIPLE DWELLINGS Every multiple dwelling two stories or more in height hereafter erected shall have at least one flight of stairs extending from the entrance floor to the roof; and the stairs in public halls therein I shall each be at least four feet wide in the clear. All stairs shall be constructed with a rise of not more than eight inches and with treads not less than ten inches wide and not less than four feet long 1, in the clear. Comment: I am not sure that the requirement of a stairway from the entrance to the roof has ever been enforced. The Uniform Building Code, Section 3305(o), states a less restrictive requirement of said stairway needed in every building four (4) or more stories in height with a { i roof pitch not greater than 4 in 12. {r + M. Pg. 1915, 8413.45 CELLAR ENTRANCE I I In every multiple dwelling hereafter erected there shall be an entrance to the cellar or other lowest story from the outside of said building. MICROFILMED BY j JORM MICROLAB I CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES 6 Comment: New construction design generally uses the lowest floor level for dwelling units and has only a small utility room for furnace, electric meters, etc. Such design does not permit outside entrance, but the rooms are fire isolated from the dwelling units. Further consideration to this requirement should be given. N. Pg. 1915, #413.54 DUMB -WAITER AND ELEVATOR SHAFTS All dumb -waiters and elevators hereafter constructed in multiple dwellings shall be in enclosures constructed of fire -resistive materials with fire -restrictive doors at all openings at each story, including the cellar. In the case of dumb -waiter shafts such door shall be self-closing and such shaft shall be completely separated j from the stairs by walls of approved fire -resistive material enclosing the same. This section does not apply to dumb -waiter shafts or elevator shafts which are already in existence, but only to those which may be installed after this chapter takes affect. Comment: This code requirement is already covered by prevailing fire codes'. 0. Pg. 1915, #413.56 HEIGHT OF DWELLINGS No dwelling shall be increased in height so that it exceeds A times the width of the widest street on which it abuts nor in any case exceeds 100 feet. Comment: This requirement is addressed more effectively in current zoning or building codes. P. Pg. 1915, #413.58 SKYLIGHTS - VENTILATORS All new skylights hereafter placed in a multiple dwelling shall be provided with ventilators having a minimum opening of 40 square inches and also with either fixed or movable louvers or with movable sashes, and shall be of such size as may be determined to be practical by the health officer. Comment: Other sections (light and ventilation) establish requirements without meaning to be specific as to the type or method of installation. Such specificity, as contained above, is often not the best solution to the problems involved in skylight installations. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES IIOIMES MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 140111ES Lam.^1 7 Q. Pg. 1916, #413.62 NUMBER OF WATER CLOSETS In every dwelling existing prior to the passage of this chapter, there shall be provided at least one water closet for every two apartments, groups or suits of rooms, or a fraction thereof, except that in multiple dwellings of Class B there shall be provided at least one water closet for every twenty occupants or fraction thereof. Comment: The Iowa City Houisng Codes require one full bath in each dwelling unit or one facility for every eight roomers. I would suggest that the total number of occupants using a single bath facility be lowered from twenty persons to, say, 10 or 12 persons. R. Pg. 1917, #413.64 COLOR OF CELLAR WALLS The cellar walls and cellar ceiling of every multiple dwelling shall by the owner by thoroughly whitewashed or painted a light color and shall be so maintained by him when required by the health officer. Comment: This requirement is quite irrelevant. S. Pg. 1917, #413.65 FLOOR BENEATH WATER CLOSETS ( In all two-family dwellings and multiple dwellings, the floor or other surface beneath and around water closets and sinks shall be maintained in good order and repaired and, if of wood, shall be kept well painted. I Comment: j I would recommend that this code requirement be changed to more t i relevant wording. Proposed Change: i In all dwelling units the floor or other surface beneath and around water closets, lavatories and sinks shall be constructed and f maintained so as to be reasonably impervious to water. ' T. Pg. 1917, #413.67 WATER SUPPLY - SINKS Every dwelling not exempted in Section 413.6 shall have within the dwelling at least one proper sink with running water furnished in sufficient quantity at one or more places exclusive of the cellar. Two-family dwellings and multiple dwellings of Class A there shall be, at least one sink on every floor, accessible to each family on the floor occupied by said family without passing through any other i apartment. Where City water is not available, the owner shall i provide proper and suitable tanks, pumps or other appliances to MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 140111ES M. 0 8 receive and to distribute an adequate and sufficient supply of water at each floor in the said dwelling at all times of the year, during all hours of the day and night. But a failure in the general supply of city water shall not be construed to be a failure on the part of such owner, provided proper and suitable appliances to receive and distribute such water have been provided in said dwellings. Comment: Other codes, such as the Uniform Building Code and the Uniform Plumbing Code, are more specific in regards to these requirements. This state code is so minimal that it is unlikely that most people would tolerate only one sink per floor. It might also be noted that a sink is requried in any room containing a toilet. U. Pg. 1916, #413.68 CATCH BASINS In the case of dwellings where, because of lack of city water supply or sewers, sinks with running water are not provided inside the I dwellings, one or more catch basins or some other approved convenience for the disposal of waste water, if necessary in the opinion of the health officer, shall be provided in the yard or court, level with the surface thereof and at a point easy of access to the occupants of such dwelling. Comment: i I This requirement is quite outdated. V. Pg. 1917, #413.70 COLOR OF WALLS OF COURTS In multiple dwellings the walls of all courts, unless built of a light color brick or stone, shall be thoroughly whitewashed by the owner or shall be painted a light color by him and shall be so renewed whenever necessary, as may be required by the health officer. Comment: This requirement is quite irrelevant. W. Po. 1917, #413.71 COLOR OF WALLS OF OTHER ROOMS In all multiple dwellings erected prior to this chapter, the health officer may require the walls and ceilings of every room that does not open directly on the street to be calcimined or painted so as to furnish adequate lighting of such room and may require this to be renewed as often as may be necessary. Comment: Perhaps reconsideration of this requirement should be made. rl;7^ - - ... MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 110111ES 9 K. PU- 1910, #413.05 SINKS AND WAIER CLOSUS In all multiple dwellings erected prior to the pasage of this chapter, the woodwork encasing sinks, except sinks in butler's pantries and water closets, shall be removed and space underneath said fixtures shall be left open. The floor and wall surfaces beneath and around the said fixture shall be put in good order and repair and if of wood shall be kept well painted. Defective and unsanitary water closet fixtures shall be replaced by proper fixtures, as defined by this chapter. Comment: Lavatories with built-in vanity type cabinetry are a popular and convenient style in bathrooms. This type of construction does not necessarily indicate that maintenance would be unsanitary. Y. Pg. 1917, #413.73 ANIMALS No horse, cow, calf, swine, sheep, goat, chickens, geese or ducks shall be kept in any dwelling or part thereof. Nor shall any such animal be kept on the same lot or premises with a dwelling except under such conditions as may be prescribed by the health officer. No such animal, except a horse, shall under any circumstance be on the same lot or premises with a multiple dwelling. No dwelling or premises thereof shall be used for the storage or handling of rags or j junk. Comment: It would be my feeling that the last two sentences be removed from this requirement. Z. P9. 1920 ENFORCEMENT IN CERTAIN CITIES In cities of more than 100,000 population, as shown by the last federal census, having a department or division of building inspection in charge of a person devoting his entire time to the supervision of building construction and to the enforcement of laws and ordinances relating to building construction, repair, alteration, removal and to related matters, the City Council may, by ordinance, provide that said person shall be charged with the powers and duties charged in Sections 413.29-413.103 to the Board of Health and to the health officer, and that all plans, specifications, affidavits, forms and statements in said sections presecribed to be filed with the health officer shall be filed with such person; and that said person may issue valid permits, certificates and ordinances providing, without the certificate of the health officer here and before provided to be filed in the office of the department of building. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES 1 10 + 1 i Comment: I I feel that this enforcement clause might more effectively be changed to populations of more than 10,000 rather than 100,000. AA• l9. 1912, #413.22 LIVING ROOMS AND BEDROOMS In every dwelling hereafter erected all living rooms and bedrooms shall be of the following minimum sizes: Every such room shall contain at least 80 square feet of floor area except the kitchenettes may be 40 square feet in area; no such room, except kitchenette, shall be, in any part of required area less than seven feet wide. In all dwellings and in each apartment, group or suite of rooms there shall be at least one room containing not less than 120 square feet of floor area. Uniform Building Code Section 1307.(b) FLOOR AREA I Every dwelling shall have at least one room which shall have not less 150 square feet of floor area. Other habitable rooms except kitchens shall have an area of not less than 70 square feet. Comment: The Iowa City Building Inspection Division has amended the Uniform 1 Building Code to read the same as the State Housing Code, however, the State should be aware of the discrepancy between the two since it I has adopted both codes. The Housing Code of Iowa City is consistent with the State Housing Code in the requirement of 80 square feet as a minimum for the size of any habitable room. I i i ji 4 2 1 i MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOINES City of Iowa CIC, MEMORANDUM Date: September 7, 1979 To: Neal G. Berlin, City Manager From: Terry Steinbach, Senior Housing Inspector Re: H.I.S. - 10% Window Requirement In an attempt to supply the City Council with information regarding the number of dwelling units in Iowa City without sufficient window area, I have taken a survey from the Housing Inspectors since our departmental filing system is not capable of supplying information regarding the number of specific housing code violations. In the past 6-8 months, the Housing Division has issued at least 21 notices of violation with regard to lack of sufficient (window/skylight) natural light. Of these, Black's Gaslight Village is the only property listed on the National Register of Historic Places. A breakdown of these violations shows that: 1) Five cases are still in violation with time left on orders to correct. 2) Seven cases, correction has been completed. 3) Two cases resulted in vacation of units or rooms with use changed to storage. (These units also lacked required ceiling height.) 4) Seven cases have been appealed. (Five cases have been upheld by Housing Board of Appeals -- Four at Black's Gaslight Village.) (Two cases not yet heard by Board.) The problems of lack of required window area and ceiling height generally arise in buildings which were originally designed for use as single family dwellings. The use and classification have been changed by the owners in order to accommodate more occupants for rental purposes and, therefore, changes need to be made to meet the minimum housing requirements. In addressing the question of hardship to the owner/operator in complying with the housing code, it is my opinion that this requirement does not cause an unfair amount of hardship on the responsible party. The violation of lack of required ceiling height has caused much greater expense to those persons who have chosen to correct the violation rather than vacate the unit. bj5/7 MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB % CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MORIES City of Iowa Citi MEMORANDUM Date: October 2, 1979 To: City Manager and City Council From: Michael Kucharzak, Director of Housing & Inspection Services Re: Rezoning of Future Public Housing Site At the informal Council session of September 24, 1979, the City Council indicated a willingness to pursue placement of public housing on the site owned by University Baptist Church. As part of the option to purchase the property executed by the City, the buyer is obligated to rezone the property from RlA to R3. This rezoning is necessary to allow for the proposed construction of 20 units of public housing. This rezoning is in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan adopted by the City Council and is compatible with the residential use immediately adjoining the site. The Housing Coordinator has been instructed to contact Don Schmeiser and arrange for the necessary hearing for rezoning. bc2/18 MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOINES ■ r 1 City of Iowa CI!' MEMORANDUM Date: October 11, 1979 To: City Council From: Drew Shaffer Re: Cable Update Hawkeye CableVision has applied for an "exception" to the Planning and Zoning Commission (and to the Board of Adjustment) for the tower site northwest of property being developed by Hy -Vee on Highway 1 North. A public hearing date for this matter is forthcoming. Due to unforeseen problems, Hawkeye has announced a new system activation timetable. They will begin laying cable on January 1, 1980 and March 1, 1980 is the new system activation date. This is still within the ordinance requirements (which calls for system activation by March 28, 1980). Unforeseen problems include trouble confirming equipment delivery dates and trouble finding the construction crews necessary to build the Iowa City system. Several equipment delivery dates have now been established and Mr. Blough may decide to organize his own construction crews to build the Iowa City system. bdw4/1 11(of MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOIMES i City of Iowa City MEMORANDUM DATE: October 12, 1979 TO: The Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Neal Berlin, City Manager John Hayek, City Attorney RE: Proposed Rental of Office Space -- Henry Louis Building This is to apprise you of the need for additional office space for the Iowa City Legal Department and the availability of the upper floor of the Henry Louis Building for such purposes. Louis Building Now Available Numerous alternative locations have been discussed during the past year or so as potential office space to alleviate the overcrowding which now exists in the Civic Center. Mr. Dennis Kraft, Director of Planning and Program Development, has been negotiating with Mr. Dick Blum for rental space of the upper floor of the Henry Louis Building located at 506 E. College within a block of the Civic Center. The building is owned by Mr. Henry Louis individually. Mr. Kraft has negotiated an agreement which we feel would be ad- vantageous to the administration of City government and would in fact enhance delivery of legal services to the City. Proposed Agreement The proposed rental agreement for office space would be for a five (5) year term at the rate of $5.25/square foot for a total of $612.50/month or $7,350/year. This payment would include heat, water, electricity and air conditioning. Refuse collection would not be included. The facilities are now clean and ready for oc- cupancy, with no remodeling required. No furnishings would be needed except perhaps reception area furniture. The upper floor contains four offices, the largest of which would serve as a combination library -conference room. The premises are pleasant and especially suited to the unique needs of the Legal Department. Rosemary Vitosh, Director of Finance, agrees that the rental rates are reasonable. Even though the search for additional space has gone on for some time, there is no specific budget item for such space. Thus, a budget amendment would be required to tap the general fund balance. IIICROFIIMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES I10IME5 -2- Overcrowding and Increased Workload It is becoming more apparent to even the casual observer that the increased City duties and roncommitant: additional staff, have rosulted in overcrowding in the Civic Center. This overcrowding has in turn resulted in less than optimum working conditions. The newer programs which Iowa City has instituted include the Senior Center, public housing, housing code enforcement and housing rehab- ilitation programs. Each program results not only in increased staff but also in more demands on the Legal staff. In response to these changes, Mr. Dennis Kraft of the Planning Department has been in- vestigating various sites in close proximity to the Civic Center. These sites have been rejected as office space for the Legal Depart- ment for the following reasons: 1. Third Floor - Davis Building. This location was considered for the Legal Department, but was rejected in early summer of this year as economically infeasible. Complete remodeling would have been required. 2. Old Elks Building. This building, located at the southwest corner of Gilbert and Washington, needs extensive remodeling, and the owners are not willing to do it. It is also poorly ventilated and generally not suited for office space. 3. Old Post Office. The first and second floor of the Old Post Office, plus the mezzanine, are reserved for the proposed Senior Center activities. The original plans were for the Legal and Planning Departments to be moved to the third floor. Expected occupancy is at least one year away. However, Senior Center activities may well ex- pand to the third floor. Also, there is now some question of whether non -federally funded departments such as Legal could be housed therein. The Senior Center and the Planning Depart- ment of course qualify as proper occupants. Recommendation Considering the rather unique needs of the City legal staff, it is our recommendation that the City Council consider the proposed rental of additional office space as a way to alleviate current overcrowding in the Civic Center. Moving the Legal Department would also free up space for other departmental needs. We respectfully request your consideration of the proposed move. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES 1101NES . ,, ^City ®4 Iowa C14'- Date: October 8, 1979 To: City Council, City Manager From: Richard J. Plastino, Director of Public Works Re: Discussion Date for Block 64 Parking Garage \ In the bid specifications for the Block 64 garage, we had included a bid alternate. This bid alternate stated that we would make a decision on the Block 64 garage by November 2 and there was an item for the contractor to reduce his bid for this early start. There were no deducts by any of the bidders for this early start. Accordingly, we have deferred Council discussion of the completion date on the Block 83-84 garage until November 1 and action by Council, if any, would be taken on Tuesday, November 13. Letters are being solicited from the contractor and consultant on the probability of the first parking garage being partially open by Thanks- giving. Pushing the discussion to a later date will allow for more accurate prediction of whether the garage will or will not be open by Thanksgiving. As you recall, if the first garage will be partially open by Thanksgiving, many of the obstacles to awarding the bid on the second garage will be removed. On the other hand, if the first garage will not be open by Thanksgiving, the Council has stated that it will probably not award the bid for the second garage. In summary, this item will be scheduled for informal discussion on November 12 and Council action, if any, will be taken on November 13. bcl/18 cc: Block 64 File #1 Rosemary Vitosh Joe Fowler Dennis Kraft Dwight Churchill Dennis Neu MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOINES 071 City of Iowa Cit, MEMORAND M Date: October 5, 1979 To: Neal Berlin 1 From: Dick Plastino Re: Bus Route Changes / Neal, the proposed schedule f r obtaining and analyzing data from the general riding public is as follows: By October 10 - have cards placed in buses and issue news release advising riding public of the availability of the cards to record their opinion. By October 10-19 - receive comments on cards and start operation of the Washington Street transit mall. Analysis of the operation of the mall is an important adjunct to this procedure since it affects the time schedule for several of the routes. The efficiency of this operation must be analyzed at the same time that route changes, if any, are consisdered. October 19-26 - complete receiving cards and begin analysis of data on cards. Formulate alternatives and recommendations. October 26 - send information to Council in packet. October 29 - schedule for informal discussion or possibly schedule for public hearing. cc: Hugh Mose bj3/21 MICROFILMED RY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES 140INES 111; - i City of Iowa Cit, MEMORAND M Date: October 5, 1979 To: Neal Berlin 1 From: Dick Plastino Re: Bus Route Changes / Neal, the proposed schedule f r obtaining and analyzing data from the general riding public is as follows: By October 10 - have cards placed in buses and issue news release advising riding public of the availability of the cards to record their opinion. By October 10-19 - receive comments on cards and start operation of the Washington Street transit mall. Analysis of the operation of the mall is an important adjunct to this procedure since it affects the time schedule for several of the routes. The efficiency of this operation must be analyzed at the same time that route changes, if any, are consisdered. October 19-26 - complete receiving cards and begin analysis of data on cards. Formulate alternatives and recommendations. October 26 - send information to Council in packet. October 29 - schedule for informal discussion or possibly schedule for public hearing. cc: Hugh Mose bj3/21 MICROFILMED RY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES 140INES 111; - !^, I 16'r �\�casry4rr - _ Sf / v I� 4„ylU THE UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS Uepurinuml. of IInnILh, 1'hy8hatl KduuuLlun rend HeurulLLhln l,uwrunuu, Kunsns 4111015 �?ECEI'i�:�: il;f g 1919 Mayor of Iowa City Superintendent of Parks and Recreation City of Iowa City City Hall Iowa City, Iowa 52242 Dear Sirs: My compliments to you and your hard work on the development of the pedestrian mall in downtown Iowa City. The mall is both beautiful and functional. Such an undertaking is a credit to those who possessed the foresight to develop such an esthetically pleasing site. Again, my compliments to you. Sincerely, llnvldJ. ymalski Main Campus, Lawrence College of Health Sciences and Hospital, Kansas City and Wichita MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOIRES 197.3 p i r II { I IJ i I I I !^, I 16'r �\�casry4rr - _ Sf / v I� 4„ylU THE UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS Uepurinuml. of IInnILh, 1'hy8hatl KduuuLlun rend HeurulLLhln l,uwrunuu, Kunsns 4111015 �?ECEI'i�:�: il;f g 1919 Mayor of Iowa City Superintendent of Parks and Recreation City of Iowa City City Hall Iowa City, Iowa 52242 Dear Sirs: My compliments to you and your hard work on the development of the pedestrian mall in downtown Iowa City. The mall is both beautiful and functional. Such an undertaking is a credit to those who possessed the foresight to develop such an esthetically pleasing site. Again, my compliments to you. Sincerely, llnvldJ. ymalski Main Campus, Lawrence College of Health Sciences and Hospital, Kansas City and Wichita MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOIRES 197.3 UNITED STATES PARTMENT OF COMMERCE Office of Federal Statistical Policy and Standards ., ♦� Washington, O.C. 20230 ou 0 •i 197 rAo("� F y� J014kismN COUNTY REQ i Mr. Harry Hokanson Acting Executive Director OCT 91979 Johnson County Regional Planning Camaission PLANNING COMNIw,IUN_ 225 South Dubuque Street Iowa City, Iowa 52240 Dear Mr. Hokanson; This is in reply to your letter of September 11, 1979, concerning the Iowa City, Iowa Standard Metropolitan Statistical Area (SMSA). Urbanized areas are defined by the U.S. Bureau of the Census according to specific criteria. The urbanized area designation is separate from the SMSA designation. Fln the case of the FHWA and UMTA trocrams the urbanized area,.rather.than the SMSA, is used to allocate funds. --- - Y -there is no. na urbanized area for Iowa City; even g e -area is about to be desi ted an•- 9 sMSA.�he_urbaniye3�yrea�:£or " Iowa City,Will be -defined around.April 1981 following the availability 0f_tbLQaa8D_census. dot _ I hope I have clarified this point. If I can be of further help to you in this matter, please let me know. Sincerely, -'JOSEPH W. DUNCAN Director i l- MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES IIOIHES 1914 I i.. of Tq4+ ` O illG1)4 01G-1<rl�`i%'%G E Iv1L�L ° APR c2 PLANNING AND RESEARCH DIVISION l Yow B00 LINCOLN WAY AMES, IOWA 50010 April 20, 1979 REF. NO. 708.540 fir. Emil Brandt, Executive Director Johnson County Regional Planning Commission 2211 South Dubuque Street Iowa City, Iowa 52240 Dear Mr. Brandt: This is in response to your request for information concerning the possible designation of Iowa City and environs as a Metropolitan Statistical Area (I1SA) and the effect of such designation on the need to develop a formal urbanized area comprehensive, cooperative and continuing (3-C) transportation Planning and programming process. Such a process, which conforms to federal and state laws and policies, must be established for any urban area of 50,000 or more population before a pronram of highway and public transportation projects - elioible for federal financial assistance can be approved by the U.S. Department of Transportation. The develoor..ent of an acceptable 3-C transportation planning process for the Iowa City Urban Area should be facilitated because such a process has been partially carried on by the Johnson County Regional Planning Commission since 1970. Although the 3-C planning process is sometimes regarded only as a requirement to receive federal funds for project implementation, it should be viewed as a mechanism that can encourage and promote the development of a multimodal transportation system which will serve the metropolitan area and state effectively and efficiently. The U.S. and Iowa DOT's will provide assistance and coonerate with local officials, actinq through a metropolitan planning organization (f -!P0), in the development of transportation plans and programs which are based on transportation needs. These plans and programs are to be prepared with due consideration given to comprehensive long-range land use schemes and social, economic, environmental, system performance and energy conservation objectives which affect the future development of the metropolitan area. To initiate and conduct an official urban transportation planninq process in the Iowa City Urban Area, the following events or actions are necessary: 1. U.S. Census Bureau designation of the Iowa City Urban Area as a metropolitan statistical area and receipt of appropriate documentation, including a map showing the extent of the urbanized area. COMMMSIONERS MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOIRES -2- 2. Governor's designation of the 14PO responsible, together with the State, for executing the 3-C planning process in conformance with federal and state laws and policies. 3. Establishment of appropriate MPO transportation committee structure (e.g., Policy and technical and citizens advisory committees) and geographical Identification of the urban transportation study area. 4. Execution of agreements between the: (a) Iowa DOT and MPO to conduct a 3-C planning process and to provide FHWA Metropolitan Planning(P�) and UMTA Section 8 Planning and Technical Studies funds. (b) MPO and A-95 agency (if they are not one and the same) to coordinate their activities. (c) MPO and publicly owned operators of mass transportation services to cooperate in carrying out the .3-C planning process. 5. Establishment of the technical elements of the transportation planning Process. 6. Development of a. prospectus and unified planning work program (UWP). The prospectus sets out a multiyear 2- work, whereas, the UWP annually ydescribes yall surban �transpoework �tationnand related -planning activities anticipated during the next 1 or 2 years period. 7. Development and adoption of an urban transportation plan which consists of the transportation system mananEment element (a short-range plan of 5-6 years) and the long-range element (a long-rarge plan of 20-25 years). 8. Preparation of a 5-6 year transportation improvement program (TIP) .which includes projects derived from the short and long-range elements Of the urban area transportation plan. g. Certification of the 3-C urban transportation planning process. FHWA, UMTA and the Iowa DOT annually review and evaluate this planning process I for compliance with federal and state requirements. 10. Establishment of a continuing planning process (interfacing with the adoption of an initial transportation plan and land use plan) which ensures that the plan will reflect the area's transportation as they change over time. needs The conduct of an Iowa City Urban Area 3-C planning financed by FHWA, UMTA and local governments participatingsinould the ProcesstlyThe Iowa DOT would provide in-kind services in the form of technical assistance and computer services for the operation of travel and air quality simulation models. The Iowa DOT, at the request of the NPO, may furnish an urban transportation Planner on a full-time basis to the MPO. of this planners' salary would be paid by thenState randt80aPerccentabylthe3MP0. A rough estimate of the 1978 Surface Transportation Act planning funds which would IIICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES i I 1 j I I i i ,i 1 j 1 -3- n be made available by FHWA and UMTA respectively are $12,000 and 520,000 Per year for the 4 year period of the Act. These funds, administered by the' Iowa DOT, would be annually allocated in part or in total to the MPO. The amount of each year's allocation is based on planning work described in the UWP and represents 80 percent of eligible expenditures. Payment for work satisfactorily completed is on a reimbursement basis. Enclosed is information concerning the urban transportation planning process and the Iowa DOT Policy 820.02, "Urban Transportation Planning Assistance". Ne will also send you, under separate cover, various federal documents relating to the process. A two-part audio slide presertation concerning the technical and non-technical aspects of the process can also be made available for your use. Our staff would be happy to meet with you at some future date to discuss this matter in more detail. Thank you for your interest, and please contact us if we can be of further assistance. OGW:ADS:ls Enclosures cc: C.I. MacGillivray Ed Finn, FHWA Bill Creger Lee Benfield Gus Anderson Transit Division Sincerely, Donald G. Ward Director Office of Advance Planning MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOIRES johnson county Ole regional planning commission I ® 29/2 south dubuque street, iowc city, i0wo 52240 (319)351-8556 Mary C Neuhauser c,, . October 9, 1979 . TO: Iowa City City Council Coralville City Council County Board of Supervisors FROM: Barry Hokanson At its meeting of 10/3/79, the JCRPC Executive Board asked me to send to you minutes (attached) of the Board's meeting on September 26th. At this meeting Keith Friese, transportation planner, outlined a series of suggestions concerning future planning programs, problems and needs. Keith offered his "Closing" comments prior to takin a position with the Grand Rapids (Michigan) Regional Transit Authority. in view of the vital issues involved in transportation planning, the Board thought you would be interested in the report of the discussion. 1 As you probably are aware, we are currently advertising for a replace- j ment for Mr. Friese, with an anticipated selection by the end of this' i month. I I I ' I r. 1 (. i j I i i i r9�6 MICROFILMED BY I JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES I` 1 ® johnson county ® regional planning commission . croceism ® Z'/2 south dubuque street, iowc city, bwo 52240 (319)351.8556 Mory CNeuhauser 10/3/79 EXECUTIVE BOARD Wednesday, September 26, 1979 4:00 P.M. First Christian Church - Basement Iowa City, IA 52240 PRESENT: Isabel Turner, Mary Neuhauser, Herbert Jordan, J. Patrick White, David Perret ABSENT:. David Roberts, Don Sehr, William Stewart, James Stehbens OTHERS: Barry Hokanson, Dixie Collins, Keith Friese, News Media The meeting was called to order by Ms. Neuhauser (M) 1) MINUTES Moved by Perret, seconded by Jordan to approve the minutes of the Executive Board meeting of 9/12/79 as corrected. Motion carried. 2) CORRESPONDENCE Mr. Hokanson reported that two A -95's had been received from ECICOG with action required before the ECICOG Board meeting on September 27th. City of Cedar Rapids - Airport Apron Mr. Hokanson explained that the project would construct a concrete apron at the Cedar Rapids Municipal Airport as the first stage of a new terminal, as provided in the Airport Master Plan which had previously been approved by JCRPC.. (M) Moved by White, seconded by Turner to request a deferral so that members of the Regional Airport System Study Committee could be notified of the project with an opportunity for comment. Motion passed. Linn County Regional Planning Commission - TIP/TSM Plan Mr. Hokanson explained the proposal which includes an outline of major street, highway and transit projects for the Cedar Rapids urbanized area. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES FIOIIIES i Mr 8 Executive Board Minutes Page 2 Mr. Friese distributed a letter from IDOT giving tentative approval to the combined transit grant for the four Johnson County systems under Section IS of the Federal Mass Transportation Assistance Act, in the amount of $347,600. Mr. Friese said this letter would clear the way for final UMTA approval of the related Section 3 grant. (M) Moved by Turner, seconded by White to forward without comment. Motion passed. Ms. Turner requested that quarterly financial reports be sent out to Board members as they had in the past. 3) DISCUSSION OF FUTURE TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ACTIVITIES Mr. Keith Friese discussed the position of Transportation Planner and the emphasis he thought should be taken with this program. Mr. Friese said he felt there is a need for a policy decision on planning programs in the future, particularly the question of whether JCRPC will continue the strong emphasis on transit coordination. I. He said that with the current staffing level, there will be heavy demands on the Transportation Planner. He suggested that the Board keep in mind that when this area, as an SMSA, develops a certified 3-C process, it will have to have a balanced program for both transit and the street/highway system. Ms. Neuhauser said she felt the staff should assemble a specific description of the 3-C planning process so that the members under- stand why it will be necessary to have more than one person in transportation planning. Mr. Friese said that if transportation planning continues to emphasize the transit components, the person hired by the Commission should have a strong background in that area and have experience in dealing with the area wide transportation process. Ms. Turner.asked if there would be another transit grant application for next year. Mr. Friese replied that there may be no Section 3 funds for three or four years, but that state operating assistance and Section 5 funds would be available. Mr. Ferret said he felt the Commission needed to clarify the status of the Area Transportation Study so that officials would understand the need for additional staffing. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES Executive Board Minutes Page 3 There was a discussion of funding for fiscal year 1981. Mr. Hokanson explained that FY '81 will likely be a "dry" year for funds but that the situation would improve dramatically in FY '82 with the receipt of $30,000 to $40,000 in transportation planning assistance. Mr. Friese expressed concern over the transportation planning relationship between JCRPC and Johnson County. He said one recurring problem is the lack of a definitive policy of the division of responsibilities among agencies. He noted that local officials clearly recognize JCRPC as the agent for transportation planning whereas the Iowa DOT identifies ECICOG as the :osponsible unit with pass-through of some tasks to JCRPC. Mr. Friese explained that this division becomes particularly complex con- cerning the Johnson County SEATS system, because of its being treated as one of the multi -county "rural" systems rather than one of four coordinated operations in this county. Mr. White agreed that the "rural" label commonly attached to the SEATS system tends to aggravate the confusion of roles. He suggested that there should be wider recognition of SEATS as a "specialized" transit provider (elderly and handicapped) with a majority of its clients residing in the urban area. Mr. Friese discussed the role of JCRPC in coordinating transit operations. He stressed the substantial demands on staff time to assist the four separate transit systems. He suggested there should be increased attention to the potential of transit con- solidation, as suggested in the recent update of the Transit Development Program. He noted that UMTA would likely be concerned with the current arrangements at such time as federal section 5 operating subsidies are sought. There was discussion of a joint transit maintenance facility as a first step toward consolidation. Mr. Friese stressed the long- term impacts of a capital investment such as a new transit garage which may be built by one of the systems, thus impeding moves toward consolidation. He noted that the transit operators had discussed the advantages of a near -downtown site, in the vicinity of the present CAMBUS garage. He observed that such a site would require inter -agency cooperation and a higher level of political commitment to the objectives of consolidation. Mr. Friese briefly discussed the pending work on transit grants, the future application for state transit assistance, and compliance with the new 11504" handicapped access regulations. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 1401IIES f i it c.. 1. j, 1 1 I 1 ) I I 1 I 1 I' i 'I 9i i Executive Board , jMinutes Page 4 I The Board members repeated their previous compliments to Mr. Friese on his work for the Commission and wished him well in his new position with the Grand Rapids (Michigan) Area Transit Authority. (M) 4) BILLS FOR APPROVAL - Moved by*Perret, seconded by White to approve the bills as sub- mitted. Motion passed. 5) CONTINUED DISCUSSION ON EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR APPLICATIONS There was discussion of schedules for interviewing Mr. Hokanson as one of the candidates for the position. Arrangements were made for informal contacts'with members of the Executive Board and other public officials. 6) ADJOURNMENT Meeting adjourned at approximately 5:45 P.M. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES IIOIIIES Johnson c unty regional planning commission —,9/2 South dubuque street, iowa city. Iowa 52240 (319)351.8556 October 12, 1979 TO: Iowa City Council FROM: Pam Ramser RE: Agency Information in This Week's Packet update on Remainder of Budget Hearing Schedule Mary C Meuhouser cn,,c � In this week's packet you will find summaries of funding requests, as follows: October 11 - Goodwill Industries Johnson County Association for Retarded Citizens October 18 - Hillcrest Family Services - Iowa City Residence for Women Lutheran Social Service Iowa City Crisis Intervention Center Crisis Center Transient Program Please note the following changes in agency scheduling: Rape Victim Advocacy Program has been rescheduled for Thursday, November 8th at 7:00 p.m. Aid and Alternatives for Victims of Spouse Abuse has been rescheduled for Thursday, November 8th at 9:30 p.m. The schedule for October 18 through November 8 now is as follows: October 18 7:00 p.m. Hillcrest Family Services - Iowa City Residence for Women 7:30 p.m. Lutheran Social Service 8:15 p.m. Crisis Center Crisis Center Transient Program FIICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES 1977 r-. Memorandum to Iowa City Council October 12, 1979 Page 2 October 25 7:00 p.m. American Red Cross 7:45 p.m. Salvation Army 8:30 p.m. Joint meeting of Red Cross and Salvation Army 9:00 p.m. Willow Creek Neighborhood Center * THERE IS NO HEARING SCHEDULED FOR NOVEMBER 1.* November 8 7:00 p.m. Rape Victim Advocacy Program 7:30 p.m. Visiting Nurse Association 8:30 p.m. Free Medical Clinic 9:00 p.m. HACAP Head Start Preschool Center 9:30 p.m. Aid and Alternatives for Victims of Spouse Abuse There will be at least one, possibly two, final wrap-up sessions to review agencies' hearings and funding requests. These will be scheduled for November 15th (and sometime early in December if a second is needed.) MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 11011IES i "• October 11, 1979 Hearings FUNDING REQUEST SUMMARY SHEET Goodwill Industries of Southeast Iowa - - Request 1979 minus 1978 1980 minus 1979 SOURCE 1978 1979 1980 + or (-)/4 Change + or (-)/4 Change United Way* $ 26,000 $ 26,000 $ 33,916 $ -0- -- $ 7,916 + 30.48 TOTAL INCOME. $615,794 $606,250 $662,138 ($ 9,544)- 1.5 $55,888 + 9.24 -Carryover $ 16,072 $ 42,746** $ 26,728 $26,674 + 166.0 ($16,018) - 37.54 TOTAL $$ AVAILABLE $631,865 $648,996 $688,866 $17,131 + 2.7 $39,870 + 6.14 TOTAL EXPENSES $554,522 $622,268 $676,331 $67,746 + 12.2 $54,063 + 8.74 (Major Categories) -Management $160,470 $213,890 $214,789 $53,420 + 33.3 $ 899- + 0.44 -Solicitation & Transp. $ 51,956 $ 35,413 $ 65,180 ($16,543)- 31.8 $29,767 + 84.14 -Food Service $ 15,785 $ 21,106 $ 20,133 $ 5,311 + 33.6 ($ 973) - 4.64 -Rehabilitation $112,910 $136,282 $151,345 $23,372 + 20.7 $15,063 + 11.14 -Contract . $ 82,768 $112,019 $137,259 $29,251 + 35.3 $25,240 + 22.54 -Store $ 27,385 $ 27,018 $ 37,501 ($ 367)- 1.3 $10,483 + 38.84 -Contrib. Goods Produc. $ 27,851 $ 68,653 $ 39,782 $40,802 + 146.5 ($28,87].) - 45.24 -Salvage $ 5,878 $ 7,013 $ 3,842 $ 1,135 + 19.3 ($ 3,171) - 45.24 * The amounts shown on Budget Form 1, Line 2a include allocations/requests from both Linn County and Johnson County United Ways. The amounts shown here are for Johnson County only. ** This figure is that given on Budget Form 1 as the 1979 beginning balance; the 1978 ending balance is given as $77,343. Goodwill is looking into the reason for this discrepancy. MAJOR BUDGETARY CHANGES FROM 1979 TO 1980 OPERATING EXPENSES I Salaries $26,623 increase** (+ 6.54) Emp. Benefits $10,500 increase (+99,14) Professional Fees $ 2,350 increase (+28.84) Insurance (bldg. & Propty) $ 2,500 increase (+33.34) Repairs & Maintenance $ 4,600 increase (+65.74) Postage & Shipping $ 400 increase (+25.04) Supplies $ 3,600 increase (+ 9.84) Transportation $ 4,965 increase (+39.14) Conferences & Mtgs.. $ 500 increase (+50.04) Memb. Dues or Assessments $ 4,514 increase (+66.54) SEATS $13,200 increase (+16504) I These represent $73,752 of a $77,232 TOTAL INCREASE in OPERATING EXPENSES. (Over) PIICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES F10111ES Goodwill Industries of Soui ast Iowa Page 2 i11 CAPITAL EXPENDITURES Property Acquisition ($13,000) decrease (-72.28) Equipment Acquisition ($ 3,125) decrease to -0- for 1980 Depreciation on Equipment ($ 2,000) decrease (- 6.98) TOTAL DECREASE of $18,125 in CAPITAL EXPENDITURES. INCOME Beginning Balance ($16,018) decrease (-37.58) Contrib. Toward Op. Expenses $ 500 increase (+25.08) Alloc. by Fed. Fundraising Orgs. (excluding J.C. United Way) $ 7,107 increase (+56.38) Fees + Grants from Gov't Agencies (excluding I.C. + U.C.) $41,000 increase (+13.58) Sale of Materials & Services to Public $ 9,000 increase (+,3.68) TOTAL INCREASE in INCOME is $57,607 (all shown above). EITHER PROGRAM AND BUDGET INFORMATION -Income from funds restricted by donor has decreased markedly: $74,590 in 1978 $14,250 in 1979 (estimated) $ 2,000 in 1980 (projected) Goodwill indicates that $13,950 or nearly all of donor -restricted income for 1979 went toward mortgage retirement; the entire $2,000 projected for 1980 will also go toward this. -Staff/client ratio is: 1:3 (total staff) 1:5 (direct service staff only) -Goodwill served 193 persons in Johnson County during 1978 and 26 persons in Linn County as well. -The following per day costs per client are given: Work Adjustment Training $13.29 Activity Center $16.07 Extended Work Experience $12.14 MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOFIlES a e Goodwill industries Of Southeast Iowa Page 3 -Two of the recommendations of the Human Services Study on Disabilities addressed employment for handicapped persons: 1) It was found that job opportunities for the competitively employable disabled are insufficient to meet demand; it was recommended that employers be educated regarding employment of handicapped persons and that promotion of the need for such job opportunities be done in conjunction with this. 2) Especially relevant to Goodwill is the need found for a long-term, full-time program of sheltered employment to better serve clients' occupational needs and to better prepare them for participation in the work force; it was recommended that the specific needs and costs for expanding Goodwill's capabilities to include such a program be explored and the most appropriate funding sources then pursued. AMENDMENTS TO BUDGET INFORMATION -The 1978 ending balance ($77,343.18) is about $35,000 higher than the 1979 beginning balance ($42,745.64). Goodwill is looking into this. -The amount of restricted monies unused one year does not agree with restricted carryover shown in the following year, e.g., for 1978 to 1979: 1978 � 1979 lb. Restricted carryover $ 3,673.40 $12,564.69 4a. Restricted support 5. TOTAL Restricted $ $74,590.15 $78,263.55 7b. Restricted Expenditures -$63,894.51 ENDING BALANCE $14,369.04 I There is also a discrepancy in restricted carryover from 1979 to 1980 (1979 ENDING BALANCE = $2,596.06; 1980 BEGINNING BALANCE = $3,825.40). Goodwill is looking into this. -The amounts given for TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE and TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES on Form 1 (Line 6 and Line 7, respectively) and Form 3 (Line 16 and Line 38, respectively) do not agree, as follows: 1979 1980 FUNDS AVAILABLE Form 1, Line 6 $648,995.64 $688,866.01 Form 3, Line 16 $611,360.34 OPERATING EXPENSES Form 1, Line 7 $652,950.01 $622,267.63 Form 3, Line 38 $599,099.00 Goodwill is also looking into this. (over) i MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB 1 CEDAR RAPIDS -DES FIORIES I Goodwill Industries of Southeast Iowa Page 4 i -The amount given for salaries to he paid in 1979 is different on Budget Form 3 than the amount shown on Form 4: Form 3 - $406,977.00 Form 4 - $375,114.32 It is noted that the Form 3 amount is based on the revised 1979 budget, while the Form 4 amount is an estimate based on present knowledge of vacancies. Therefore, the Form 4 figure would appear to be the more accurate of the two and, if used in determining total budget (per Form 3), would revise the budget downward by nearly $34,000. M amended Form 1 will be prepared and submitted. Pam Ramser JCRPC 10-10-79 MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOVIES October 11, 1979 Hearings FUNDING REQUEST ' SUMMARY SHEET Johnson County Association For Retarded Citizens SOURCERequest Col. 2 minus 1 Col. 3 minus 2 1978 1979 1980 + or (-)/% Change + or (-)/% Change United Way $ 7,300 $ 6,000 $16,200* ($ 1,300)- 17.8 $10,200 + 170.0 Johnson County* $ -- $ 11,031**** $12,000 $ -- $ 969 + 8.9 TOTAL LOCAL $$ .$ 7,300 $ 17,031$28,200 $ 9,731 + 133.3 $11,169 + 39.6 - TOTAL INCOME $ 87,631 $60,900 $76,953 + 720.7** -Carryover $10,678 *** ($26,731)- 30.5 Y $45,096 $ 35,965 $ 4,035 ($ 9,131)- 20.2 ($31,930)- 88.8 TOTAL $$ AVAILABLE $55,774 $123,596 $64,935 $67,822 + 121.6 $58,661 - 47.5 TOTAL EXPENSES $19,809 $119,561** $63,100 $99,752 + 503.6 ($56,461)- 47.2 j (Major Categories) -Management $ 650 $ 3,200 $ 7,200 $ 2,550 + 392.3 $ 4,000 + 125.0 -Family support $ 5,500 $ 3,500 $ 4,150 ($ 2,000)- 36.4 $ 650 + 18.6 -Community Awareness $ -- $ 1,000 $ 4,805 $ __ $ 3,805 + 380.5 -Friends Program $ -- $ 500 $ 1,605 $ -Advocac S 1,105 + 221.0 Y $ -- $ 500 $ 1,160 $ -- $ 660 + 132.0 -Sports Day$ Soo $ 500 $ 775 $ -o- $ 275 + 55.0 -Summary Program $ $ 12,531 $13,000 $ $ 469 + 3.7 i -Nelson Adult Ctr. $ -- $ 23,300 $31,600 $ 1 i -Payment to Affil. $ 8,300 + 35.6 Organizations $ 3,700 $ 4,245 $ 4,300 $ 545 + 14.7 $ 55 + 1.3 { * 1979 request from United Way was $12,031; 1980 request thus represents a $4,169, or 34.68 increase over the 1979 request. 1 ** This amount is included on Line 4a (Form 1) of the Calendar Year forms, instead of being shown on Line 2c. All Johnson County money is restricted to the summer program. 1 *** These figures represent such a great increase over previous and subsequent years i because they include $50,000 in CDBG (Block Grant) funds from the City of Iowa City i for the Nelson Adult Center. I i ! (over) ---..-,-.._-.,....- MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 110IBES Johnson County Association f' ­\Retarded Citizens Page 2 MAJOR BUDGETARY CHANGES FROM 1970 to 1980 OPERATING EXPENSES Salaries $ 4,000 'increase* (+125.06) Mortgage Payments $12,300 increase (+100.06) Bldg. & Property Insurance $ 1,000 increase (+100.06) Printing & Publications $ 125 increase (+ 26.36) Conferences & Meetings $ 200 increase (new expense) Repairs & Maint. (Prop'ty) ($ 5,000) decrease (- 50.06) These represent $12,625 of a $13,439 TOTAL INCREASE in OPERATING EXPENSES. CAPITAL EXPENDITURES i Property Acquisition ($70,000) decrease to -0- in 1980 INCOME I Gannett Grant & Gifts ($ 3,000) decrease (- 75.06) Community Block Grant ($50,000) decrease to -0- in 1980 Investment Income ($ 500) decrease (- 62.56) U of I Rent $13,800 increase (+ 50.06) Bummer Program (Johnson Co.) $ 969 increase (+ 8.86) These represent all of a $38,731 decrease in TOTAL INCOME (excluding J.C. United Way). NOTE: It is projected that the organization's beginning balance will be depleted by $31,930, or 88.86, from January, 1979 to January, 1980. This will leave a balance of $4,035. OTHER PROGRAM AND BUDGET INFORMATION -Donated Services listed will total a projected equivalent of $13,300 this year and $12,600 in 1980. These donated services include administrative, legal, and clerical services, as well as transportation for the Summer Program. j -The agency has one paid staff person (Chris Franson, Executive Director) who has been working 3/8 -time; her position will increase to 1/2 -time in 1980. j -Johnson County ARC served approximately 1,000 Johnson Co=ty residents during 1978; this compares to 200-250 persons served during 1977, as reported on last year's form.. 1 -Fees charged are: $2/day minimum for emergency care (sliding scale). $3/day minimum for respite care (slidtmg scale). $100 maximum (sliding scale) for Summer Program. i i i MICROFILMED BY i JORM MICROLAB I CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MONIES 1 Johnson County Association for Retarded Citizens Page 3 j -See GOALS & OBJECTIVES forms for specific information on the agency's programs. i -The Human Services Study on Disabilities addressed the following areas of need which are relevant to the ARC's programs: a. Public Education A need was found for education of the community as to the nature, effects, and other specifics of handicapping conditions, particularly education through the schools and education of employees. The A1RC's Community Awareness program is working to address this need (with a focus on mental retardation). b. Information on Services A need was found for a better system of disseminating information on services in the area for handicapped persons through several media. The ARC publishes a brochure "Here to serve" which furthers the meeting of this need. c. Day Care A need for more options for day care for handicapped persons was found by the study. The ARC is involved in helping to meet this need through its involve- i ment with the Nelson Adult Center, particularly through securing Community Development Block Grant monies for the Center. AMENDMENTS TO BUDGET INFORMATION Calendar Year Forms Form 1, Line 4 (1979) should be $80,131 1 Pam Ramser •� JCRPC F 10-10-79 i i i 1 i i MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 140111ES B _ October 18, 1979 Hearings FUNDING REQUEST SUMMARY SHEET Hillcrest Family Services - Iowa City Residence For Women * Fiscal year used by the program is November 1 - October 31, therefore, FY '79 is November 1, 1977 through October 31, 1978. MAJOR BUDGETARY CHANGES FROM FY 179 TO FY '80 EXPENSES salaries $3,827 increase (+7.08) This represents.most of a $5,500 TOTAL INCREASE in OPERATING EXPENSES. INCOME Fees and Grants (not including J.C.) -includes residents' fees, allocations by other counties and states $2,254 increase (+6.08) This represents the entire increase in income (not including that from Johnson County) OTHER PROGRAM AND BUDGET INFORMATION -Staff/client ratio is 5:7, with no more than 2 staff on duty at any given time. -Nine persons in Johnson County were served by the program during 1978. -Fees are charged in the following manner: "depending on arrangements made between the county and the client, the client may be asked to donate 1/4 of her net income toward maintenance." IIICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 110INES (over) FY 79 minus FY 78 FY 80 minus FY 79 SOURCE FY '78* £Y !79* FY '80* + or (-)/8 Change + or (-)/8 Change Johnson County $43,570 $46,134 $54,000 $ 2,564 + 5.98 $ 7,866 + 17.1% TOTAL INCOME $79,446 $83,880 $94,000 $ 4,434 + 5.68 $10,120 + 12.18 -Carryover -0- $ 4,620 -0- $ 4,620 -- ($ 4,620) - 100.08 TOTAL $$ AVAILABLE $79,446 $88,500 $94,000 $ 9,054 + 11.48 $ 5,500 + 6.28 TOTAL EXPENSES $74,826 $88,500 $94,000 $13,674 + 18.38 $ 5,500 + 6.28 (Major Categories -Management $10,968 $12,492 $13,366 $ 1,524 + 13.98 $ 874 + 7.08 -I.C. Residence Pgm. $63,858 $76,008 $80,634 $12,150 + 19.08 $ 4,626 + 6.18 * Fiscal year used by the program is November 1 - October 31, therefore, FY '79 is November 1, 1977 through October 31, 1978. MAJOR BUDGETARY CHANGES FROM FY 179 TO FY '80 EXPENSES salaries $3,827 increase (+7.08) This represents.most of a $5,500 TOTAL INCREASE in OPERATING EXPENSES. INCOME Fees and Grants (not including J.C.) -includes residents' fees, allocations by other counties and states $2,254 increase (+6.08) This represents the entire increase in income (not including that from Johnson County) OTHER PROGRAM AND BUDGET INFORMATION -Staff/client ratio is 5:7, with no more than 2 staff on duty at any given time. -Nine persons in Johnson County were served by the program during 1978. -Fees are charged in the following manner: "depending on arrangements made between the county and the client, the client may be asked to donate 1/4 of her net income toward maintenance." IIICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 110INES (over) Hillcrest Family Services - iowa City Residence For Women Page 2 -In regard to complaints that the service is not provided to men, Ann Lundquist, Program Director, notes that Johnson County Department of Social Services keeps a count of such requests, and that there are currently no plans to provide this service for men, as apparently the need is not great enough. -The program has seven staff persons and a total of 4.35 fulltime equivalents. -It may be noted that statistics cited in the Human Services study on Mental Health (11/77) show that women comprise 65% of all clients being seen by mental health programs; in contrast the study cites the fact that men comprise 80% of substance abuse, treatment clients and 908 of those persons in correctional i facilities and programs. j -The need for a halfway house for men returning from psychiatric treatment centers was brought to the attention of the Human Services staff but there was insufficient information uport which to base a recommendation for such a program. AMENDMENTS TO BUDGET INFORMATION None. i i i Pam Ramser JCRPC 10-11-79 i i i 1 � I I I i i i- i i i j I i- � FIICROFILMED BY I JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES I10IIIES October 18, 1979 Hearings OTHER INFORMATION ON BUDGET AND PROGRAMS Funding is being requested from Johnson County United Way Programs. for two FUNDING REQUEST ' Family and Individual Counseling Counseling With Expectant Single Parents 2/1/78-1/31/79 1980_ Budget ` SUMMARY SHEET Number Served 19 Brief Service 42 Cases 40 Est'd Cases Lutheran Social Service of Iowa 450 Cost/Unit + 5.1% SOURCE United Way INCO2+D; EXPENSES 1978 $ 8,000 $1,229,367 $ 126,257 $1,355,624 $1,194,004 Request 1979 1980 $1,463,0 $ 161,6$ $ 8,0ma$$ $1,624,6$268,996 $1,463,0$268,996 1979 minus 1978 + or (-)/$ Chane -0- __S $233,633 + 19.0$118,300 35,363 + 28.0TOTAL$$AVAILABLE + 19.8 + 22.5 1980 minus + or (-)/9 1,000 + + $118,300 + $118,300 + 1979 Chan 12.5TOTAL 8.1-Cazryaver 7.3TOTAL 8.1 OTHER INFORMATION ON BUDGET AND PROGRAMS Funding is being requested from Johnson County United Way Programs. for two Counseling With Expectant Single Parents ' Family and Individual Counseling Counseling With Expectant Single Parents 2/1/78-1/31/79 1980_ Budget %change Number Served 19 Brief Service 42 Cases 40 Est'd Cases Units of Service(Case Hrs) 428 450 Cost/Unit + 5.1% $25.87 $27.93 TOTAL Service Cost +.8.09 $11,072 $12,569 +13.59 Family and Individual Counseling 2/1/78-1/31�7g 1980 Budget echancZe Number Served 39 Brief Service 100 Cases 112 Est'd Cases Units of Service(Case Hrs) 1,126 1,000 Cost/Unit -3.1.2e $21.09 $23.80 TOTAL Service Cost $23,747 +12.8a $23,800 + 0.28 (Over) hfICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES IIOIIIES Lutheran Social Service of Iowa Page 2 i i $8,500 of the request from United Way would go to Family Counseling; $500 to Counseling With Expectant Single Parents. -Staff/client ratio is about 1:30. Pam Pamser JCRPC 10-11-79 I i 4 f 1 1 j i v r MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 1401IIES * United Way allocation/request is given on a calendar year basis; all other figures are for July -July fiscal year. MAJOR BUDGETARY CHANGES FROM FY 80 to FY 81 EXPENSES Salaries $1,815 increase (+ 7.0%) Rent $1,200 increase (+33.38) Repairs & Maint. ($1,000) decrease (-90,94) Financial Asst. to Individuals ($ 120) decrease (-23.14) These represent $1,895 toward a $2,448 TOTAL INCREASE in OPERATING EXPENSES. (over) MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES IIORIES October 18, 1979 FUNDING REQUEST Hearings SUMMARY SHEET Iowa City Crisis Intervention Center SOURCE United Way Iowa City 1978/FY79* 1979/FY80*1980/FY81* $11,100 $13,000 $13,520 -- $ 51000 $ 5,350__ +Cor 2 minus 1 (-)/8 Change $1,900 + 17.14 $5,000 Col. 3 minus 2 + or (-)/a Change $ 520 + 4.7% $ 320 + 6.48 Johnson County $21,273 $14,600 $16,522 ($6,673=,48 $1,922 + 13.28 TOTAL LOCAL $$ .$32,273 $32,600 $35,392 $ 327 + 1.04 $2,792 + 8.68 TOTAL INCOME $39,414 $39,776 $43,322 $ 362 + 0.94 $3,546 + 8.98 -Carryover $ 2,392 $ 4,831 $ 2,812 $2,439 +102.08 ($2,019) - 41.88 TOTAL $$ AVAILABLE TOTAL EXPENSES (Major Categories) $41,806 $36,975 $44,607 $41,785 $46,134 $44,167 $2,801 + $4,820 + 6.78 13.08 $1,527 $2,372 + 3.48 + 5.78 -Management -Crisis Intervention -Food Bank -Community Educ. -Counseling Ser. To $27,377 $ 4,253 $ 1,381 $ 1,379 $29,124 $ 6,987 $ 1,469 $ 1,466 $30,850 $ 7,296 $1,556 $1,553 $1,747 + $2,734 + $ 88 + $ 87 + 6.48 64.38 6.48 6.3% $1,726 $ 309 $ 87 $ 87 + S.9a +4.48 + 5.98 + 5.98 Transients $ 2,585 $ 2,749 $2,912 $ 164 + 6.38 $ 163 + 5.98 * United Way allocation/request is given on a calendar year basis; all other figures are for July -July fiscal year. MAJOR BUDGETARY CHANGES FROM FY 80 to FY 81 EXPENSES Salaries $1,815 increase (+ 7.0%) Rent $1,200 increase (+33.38) Repairs & Maint. ($1,000) decrease (-90,94) Financial Asst. to Individuals ($ 120) decrease (-23.14) These represent $1,895 toward a $2,448 TOTAL INCREASE in OPERATING EXPENSES. (over) MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES IIORIES a t Iowa City Crisis Intervent Center Page 2 INCOME Contrib. Toward Op. Expenses $154 increase (+ 4.78) Assessments from Local Member Units $505 increase (+126.38) Fees & Grants (not including IC & JC) $130 increase (+ 4.9%) Sale of Materials (Training Manuals) ($ 50) decrease to $0 These represent $739 toward a $745 TOTAL INCREASE in INCOME. OTHER PROGRAM AND BUDGET INFORMATION -Paid staff is comprised of 3 persons, with a total of 2.5 fulltime equivalents. -$750 of United Way's 1980 allocation is designated for use as match money for a University of. Iowa Work Study student's salary during Fy 181. ($3,000 from Work Study). i-Services donated by Crisis Center volunteers are valued at $103,080 for 1979, with the same being projected for 1980. The greatest number of volunteer hours are devoted to Crisis Counseling (10,950 hours/year) and On -Call (8,760 hours/year).A pproximte3,00 hours/year are devoted to each of the following: Suicide Lineaandy -Staff client ratio is 1:3,060 (Paid Staff) j 10:612 (Volunteers) -4,896 persons were served during 1978 unduplicated count arrived at by following formula: 6,120 total contacts - 1,224 (208 of total contacts) 4,896. Persons served -The Crisis Center mentions the following measures it would take to alleviate complaints regarding services: 1) utilize paid staff & practicum students to cover hours which have been somewhat inconsistent in coverate (i.e., 7:30 a.m.-9:00 a.m.). 2) increase on-going skills training of volunteers. 3) make more frequent updates of referral information. -See GOALS and OBJECTIVES for more specific information on programs. i -The Crisis Center is involved in providing assistance for a number of areas of need addressed in the Human Services Studies (on Juvenile Justice, Emergency Assistance to Transients, Emergency Assistance to Residents, in particular). The following programs address specific needs mentioned in the studies: a. Transient Counseling - The need for counseling, shelter, transportation, and food for transients was cited by the Study on Emergency Assistance FIICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES Iowa Cit Crisis Intervent' Page ,3 '�1 Center i to Transients. For further discussion, see FUNDING REQUEST SUMMARY SHEET on Crisis Center T to Transients Study, ransient Program and Emergency Assistance b. Food Bank Pro The need for emergency financial assistance (for food, shelter, utilities, etc. was the number o ) after regular 8 to 5 business hours ne priority need found by the Study on Emergency Assistance to Residents. The need critical of the above needsfor food was cited as the most , and the establishment of a local food Pantry was recommended to meet this need, AMENDMENTS TO BUDGET INFORMATION None. .Pam Ramser MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES M0114ES n 1— M a I FIICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES II01NE5 October 18, 1979 ! Hearings FUNDING REQUEST SUMMARY SHEET I Crisis Center Transient Program SOURCE 1978/FY 79* 1979Fy gp• /FY United Way $2,000 $2,000 I Iowa City $3,000 $2,500 TOTAL LOCAL $$ $5,000 $4,500 TOTAL INCOME $9,032 $9,075 -Carryover $ 848 $ 193 TOTAL $$ AVAILABLE $9,880 $9,268 TOTAL EXPENSES $9,688 $9,268 (Major Categories) Request 1980/FY 81*_+ $2,080 $3,000 $5,080 $9,900 $ -_ $9,900 $9,900 Col. 2 minus 1 or (-)/8 Chan e -0- -- ($500) - 16.78 ($500) - 10.08 $ 43 + 0.58 ($655) - 77.28 ($612) - 6.28 (.5420) - 4.38 Col. + or $ 80 $500 $580 $825 ($193) $632 $632 3 minus 2 (-)/$ Change + 4.08 + 20.08 + 12.98 + 9.1% - 100.08 + 6.88 + 6.88 -Management. $1,387 -Payments to Affil. -$ 868. $ 795 ($519) - 37.48 ($ 73) - 8.48 Organizations. $ -- -Direct Services to $ 400 $ 905 $400 -- $505 + 126.38 Transients $8,301 .. ,. $8,000 $8,200 ($301). - 3.68 $200 + 2.58 * United Way allocation/request is given on calendar year July -July fiscal year. basis; all other figures are for MAJOR BUDGETARY CHANGES FROM FY 80 TO Fy 81 j EXPENSES. Rent Postage & Shipping. - $360 increase $ 50 increase (+133.38) (+100.08) I! These represent $410 of a $633 TOTAL INCREASE in OPERATING EXPENSES. I INCOME Contributions Toward Operating Expenses Fees + Grants (not $195 increase (+ 4.88) including I.C. or J.C.) $ 50 increase (+ 10.08) These represent the entire $245 and Iowa City). TOTAL INCREASE in INCOME (excluding United Way i (over) FIICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES II01NE5 - Crisis Center Transient Program Page 2 OTHER PROGRAM AND BUDGET INFORMATION -During 1979, services estimated to be worth $9,339.72 were donated by the Crisis Center; this includes 2,135 hours from Crisis Center volunteers and 156 hours from the Center's Assistant Director, Pat Meyer. The number of hours donated by the Center will remain the same for volunteers in 1980 and will double for the Assistant Director (Total Worth = $10,137.00). -During 1979, materials valued at $374.55 were donated by the Crisis Center to the program, including utilities, liability insurance, general supplies, maintenance, and equipment rental; the value of donated materials will decrease to $261.60. -The staff/client ratio for the program is: 1:404 (Paid Staff) .1:8 (Volunteers) -The program served 808 persons during 1978. -See COALS 6 OBJECTIVES statement for more specific information. -In 1977, the Human Services Project conducted a study on Emergency Assistance to Transients. This study explored the history and current status of these services. After Wesley House discontinued its program of transient housing in the fall of 1977, anad hoc committee was formed to find a solution to the need for continued hosuing and related services to transients. The Crisis Center staited its program as a temporary solution (until a more permanent and complete program could be started) and is continuing it as no other program has been started. More detailed information information may be found in the study on Emergency Assistance to Transients and in the files of the Human Services Project. AMENDMENTS TO BUDGET INFORMATION FISCAL YEAR BUDGET FORM 1, Line la (FY 79) - The amount here should be $848.51. Pam Ramser JCRPC 10-11-79 FIICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES IIOIIIES c G i _ ° Community'fochnology wlniliulives Program Helping Small Communities Take Advantage of Technology °Kaon L'4Eo C• JORM MICROLAB rt 7sra�,`tlgr.: , A Technology Transft---System he Communily'rechnology Initiatives Program (CrIP) is an organized response to the need for technical help expressed by smaller jurisdictions of the nation. It is a technology utilization system — a people -to -people network focusing on jurisc8ctions with populations of 50,000 or less. Structurally, CI1P consists of: ■ Local governments representing seven regional circuits across the U.S., which receive on-site technical assistance and set overall C IP policy; ■ Seven technology agents or circuit riders, each supplying a single circuit of several jurisdictions with technical assistance; ■ Seven Federal Laboratories contributing the ser- vices of the technology agents and providing them with technical backup; ■ The ready -technology resources of the National Science Foundation's science and technology net- works, the 187 -member laboratories of the Federal Laboratory Consortium, and the Exten- sion Service of the U.S. Department of Agricul- ture ■ Management by Public Technology, Inc., in association and cooperation with the National League of Cities and the International City Management Association. Why CT1P was Established CrOP was established in 1077 because: Increasingly governmental policy planning, decision- making, and public service delivery are shaped by science and technology, and Many small local governments lack the money and staff to meet the demands of their localities. These demands impact local governmen Is throughout the country with respect to such issues ns fuel shortages. waste water treatment, financial reporting and track- ing, street maintenance, solid waste management, and water quality. CPIP helps small local government meet the require- mants of science and technology and lake full advantage of opportunities afforded by science and technology for service improvement and cost control. What CT1P Offers Small Governments ■ A forum to identify and address priority problems and needs of small governments. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOIIIES ■ Informr-_'t on technologies and innovations up- plicable smallerjurisdictions. ■ Opportunities to impact developments on applied research that respond to priority needs in small jurisdictions. Purposes and Goals CrIP works to identify common technical needs and to generate solutions which can be applied in the thousands of communities under 50,000 in population. It does this by providing local officials with a meeting ground where they can develop an agenda for research, development and demonstration projects, and trans- fer innovative practical technology. C IP develops and utilizes technology and information in three principal ways: 1 It develops an R & D agenda for the needs of • smaller communities. CHP member jurisdictions engage annually in an extensive process, synthe- sizing a concise number of priority needs from a comprehensive list of needs. This list of priority problems serves as a work plan for the program on which research, development, and demon- stration projects will be based. 2It links the Federal Laboratories through the . Federal Laboratory Consortium and other contacts. A number of these labs and Federal agencies are providing scientists and engineers on Intergovernmental Personnel Act (IPA) assign- ments to CrIP communities. These persons, functioning as circuit -riding technology agents, provide CTIP member jurisdictions with technical assistance. The labs serve as backup technical support to the agents. 3It strives to maximize institutional interactions . and communications with existing local govern- ment representative organizations such as slate municipal leagues, the National League of Cities, International City Management Association, the national local government innovation network sponsored by the National Science Foundation, regional Rural Development Centers, and industry. These interactions facilitate the pro- gram's efforts to disseminate informa- tion on technologies and innovations to a larger audience of small local governments. Coupling these endeavors with other local government networks multiplies the resources available to smaller jurisdictions for technical expertise and information. na^) on technologies and innovations ap- la ... smaller jurisdictions. 1p-tuniti to impact developments on applied rch that respond to priority needs in small and Goals rkstoidentifycommontechnical needs and to solutions which can be applied in the of communities under 50,000 in population. is by providing local officials with a meeting here they can develop an agenda for research, ant and demonstration projects, and trans - live practical technology. CTIP develops and chnologv and information in three principal evelops en R & D agenda for the needs of ¢Iter communities. CTIP member jurisdictions age annually in an extensive process, synthe- fng a concise number of priority needs from a prehensive list of needs.'1'his list of priority blems serves as a work plan for the program which research, development, and demon- ation projects will be based. inks the Federal Laboratories through the ink Laboratory Consortium and other ntacts. A number o[ those labs and Federal uncles are providing scientists and engineers Intergovernmental Personnel Act (IPA) assign- nts to CI'IP communities. These persons, ctionfng as circuit -riding technology agents, vide CrIP member jurisdictions with technical ialance. The labs serve as backup technical pport to the agents. Id to maximize institutional interactions d communications with existing local govern- pnl representative organizations such as state Unicipal leagues, the National League of Cities, lernational City Management Association, the tional local government innovation network Ionsored by the National Science Foundation, Igional Rural Development Centers, and duslry. These interactions facilitate the pro- •am's efforts to disseminate informa- 3n on technologies and innovations to o larger sdience of small local governments. Coupling ipso endeavors with other local government atworks multiplies the resources available to naller jurisdictions for technical expertise id information. CTIP Steering Committee A ibers Lawrence Bashe, City Administrator. Plainfield. New Jersey Larry N. Blick, City Manager, Rockville, Maryland Tony Byrne (Chairman), Mayor, Natchez, Mississippi William H. Carslarphen. City Manager, Spartanburg. South Carolina A.J. Cooper, Jr., Mayor, Prichard. Alabama Lee R. Evell. City Manager, Clayton. Missouri Alan N. Harvey (Chairman -elect), City Manager, Vancouver, Washington Harold 1. Jacobsen, Mayor. Carson City, Nevada Orrin P. Joel, Mayor, Brookings, South Dakota Gordon H. Paquette. Mayor, Burlington. Vermont Wayne D. Wedin. (Immediate Past Chairman), City Manager, Brea, California Circuit Map CTIP `111F jurisdictions Circuit I Bran, California Cacho County. Utah Carson City, Nevada Santa Fa. Now Moxico Circuit Il Casper, Wyoming College Grove, Oregon Ilclana,Ftonlann lawiston, Idaho Vancouver, Washington Circuit III Bemidji. hfinnaso u Brookings, South Dakota Galesburg, Illinois Grand Island. Nebraska Iowa City, Iowa arcull N Bryan,Toxns Clayton, Missouri otlawn, Kansas Stillwater, Oklahomr. Circuit V Ilempstond County, Arkansas Natchm ABssissippl Prichard, Alabama Spartanburg, South Carolina Circult VI number. Wast Virginia Isabelle County, Michigan o'llara Township, Pennsylvanin Rockville,Maryland Samford, Delaware Circuit VII Burlington, Vermont East Providence, Rhudu Island Nowburyporl, Mnssechusalts Plainfield, Now Jersey Saulh Portland, Maine Public Technoingy. Inc. (Fn) be nomprofll public. Interest arganimtion dedicated In facilitating Ilse application of available and amnrging technology to slate and local government.. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES Response Card Further information about the Community Technology Initiatives Program may be obtained from: Public Technology, Inc. Director, CLIP 1140 Connecticut Avenue, NW Washington, D.C. 20036 Name Title Phone Organization Address — Cily State — Tell me more about CM publications related to: ❑Community and Economic Development ❑Criminal Justice ❑Energy ❑Environmental Services E] Fire Safely and Disaster Preparedness ❑ Health ❑Human Resources ❑Management, Finance, and Personnel ❑Public Works andlltiRUes ❑Transportation Tell me more about Public Technology's programs and services: ❑ FTI Subscriber Services ❑ PTI Publications ❑ Public Technology News ❑ Please send me an additional copy of this brochure. . t. 4 U O o7$ E c3, a ° rR,p d 4 0.E p O 'ULA R O O O D > m E v° a N V y7Q a O � N o c •C a m v o EEE °'N U O E' 0 er a� 0o mENa 5 og DO N d W �ay? a C 0 NNi CO L •T v; o O p « O m U [ p ° a > p w p O 'Gf > T p " •p O GD'OU G �' a O c o 0a o -F °`.>i.— `p°CJ w E o•N E ° oR o> m Ro L m >,?�c. mRr a°ii-R.a E m m=` t3 0a�x°33an E °Qa:: aRyci O z' a 0 m O O O G O O n R • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • N a T L n E q o o p N L O N O m 3 4 U O o7$ E c3, a ° rR,p d 4 0.E p O 'ULA R O O O D > m E v° a N V y7Q a O � N o c •C a m v o EEE °'N U O E' 0 er a� 0o mENa 5 og DO N d W �ay? a C 0 NNi CO L •T v; o O p « O m U [ p ° a > p w p O 'Gf > T p " •p O GD'OU G �' a O c o 0a o -F °`.>i.— `p°CJ w E o•N E ° oR o> m Ro L m >,?�c. mRr a°ii-R.a E m m=` t3 0a�x°33an E °Qa:: aRyci O z' a 0 m O O O G O O n R • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • -------------------------------------------- 111111 Necessary BUSINESS REPLY MAIL FIRST CLASS PERMIT NO. 73422 WASHINGTON, D.C. POSTAGE VALL BE PAID BY ADDRESSEE Public Technology, Inc. Director, CTIP 1140 Connecticut Avenue, NW Washington, D.C. 20036 MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES FIORIES L Miledin theled States N a T L O m 3 r .-7 U E: 9 rj 0 o v y O y5 vY p `o E '3 Q y z 0 0U s U N Q dS R N20 01 Cd 0 -83r « O U�: L J- a 3 S E p m Ij O ao� o �V) avi c°.° ,"-a ° �maa>�Yo d m w Do zzzzzawa:j U °O o • • • • • • • • • -------------------------------------------- 111111 Necessary BUSINESS REPLY MAIL FIRST CLASS PERMIT NO. 73422 WASHINGTON, D.C. POSTAGE VALL BE PAID BY ADDRESSEE Public Technology, Inc. Director, CTIP 1140 Connecticut Avenue, NW Washington, D.C. 20036 MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES FIORIES L Miledin theled States . t. Let's Get Rid OF "The Girl" Wouldn't 1979 be a great year to take one giant step forward for womankind and get rid of "the girl"? Your attorney says, "If I'm not here just leave it with the girl." The purchasing agent says, "Drop off your bid with the girl." A manager says, "My girl will get back to your girl." What girl? Do they mean Miss Rose? Do they mean Ms. Torres? Do they mean Mrs. McCullough? Do they mean Joy Jackson? "The girl" is certainly a woman when she's out of her teens. Like you, she has a name. Use it. A United Technologies reprint from The Wall Street lournal /O?� MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOVIES Y•'V' 1 Y � vol. z No.8 �• Seplember 1979 The Ha wkeye pride Iowa City Transit System Iowa City Transit System is one of 17 large antl small urban systems within the slate of Iowa. It is a fixed -route opthrough eration serving seven routes with 16 buses during oll•peak hours, providing rom except senior citizens who cane eft free durng he Off •peak Periods. heThe is 25 cents for everybody, The latest route revisions of the transit system, which Included alignments, extensions and other them tes.Thations wereivedso sotedme Aug.27,1978, to share and spread out the ridership evenly on all the routes. This relieved some of the. he old heavily -burdened routes. The timing of the route changes was synchronized with the opening of the Universityof Iowa after summer vacations client of system. st he inadequacies experienced by 1 ee Iowa City fT Transit Systehmsdurinp last yeaYIIOM rs Tstem from herefore, tan additional route was added, the routes were from six to seven, and two new buses were put into service during the oil -peak period. The downtown of Iowa City (Clinton and Washington Streets) Is the hub of transportation ecfivlly as three transit systems converge there to make free and easy transfers from one system to the other. The two transit systems besides Iowa City ere Cambus and Corslville Transit System. Cambus is a univeraify-owned and operated system, serving only the campus area without charging any fares. Corslville Transit serves the university and downtown Iowa City. The most commendable and noteworthy feature Is that the combined ridership of these three systems exceeds that of any other city In the entire State of Iowa, though only serving a metropolitan Population of about 50,000. Iowa City Transit System has been experiencing a steady Increase in ridership ever since Its inception during 1871. As each year passes the patronage of transit has been Increasing overwhelmingly which could be attributed to the following factors; restricted parking and shortage of parking space downtown. effective route and schedule design to meet the existing demand In ridership. Overwhelming support of the state employee support program. Approximately hall of the subscribers to the program statewide use the Iowa City Transit System. The most critical lest the transit system had to undego was during the severe 1878 winter season. Inclement weather conditions, subzero temperatures and highly demand caused a severe strain on the System during December through March• and a collapse was Imminent. It was Overfed only through timely and ehandling the sita d ridership Two used buses were purchased with 100 percent city financing to bolster thebus fleet requirements, which was having extensive breakdowns. The transit system routes were given priority for snow remove I' With all the efforts made by the management to Cope with the high ridership demand there were times when passenger. were left at the curb because Iowa City Transit buses, were packed with riders and had to pass them by. Iowa City has submitted a capital grant application for UMTA/FHWA funding approval lorprocurement of three buses. accIowa City Transit System has been one of the most progressive systems in the slate, with the d Percaplia rate. omplishment he trra silmanageroflo aCty,iHugih Mose• wasawardedtheTrans0causlM niagthis er of the Year Award for 1878 by the Iowa Department of Transportation, GREAT GOING HAWKEYE TRANSIT- KEEP IT UPIDIIIII flICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 11011JES HID THE WAL TREET JOURNAL Tuesday, Oct. 9, . Vying for Vwwers i As Jousting for Cable -TV Franchises Gets Cutthroat, Tactics Upset Some Officials BY STAN CROCK $tallaeportrr 0/710[0 wALLSTaaaTJOnFAL Wt year, Wichita Falls, Texas, had ons of Its most hotly contested voter referee- dums ever. The Issue: whether the city should openAts doors to cable television. Opponents of cable TV ran a newspaper advertisement picturing a cable, culled like an evil snake, strangling a TV set. At two local theaters they showed bootlegged films of adult programs carried on another cable - TV system, Including comedian Redd Pass's sometimes -raunchy nightclub act and the R. rated movie "Taxi Driver." Another ad raised the specter of cable TV tuming the city into a Sodom or Gomorrah: "World communism takeover Is a real threat, but It's mild compared to neral decay that threatens to destroy us U we don't act nor." Supporters promoted cable TV as a veld- . cle for religion and children's programa and birname entertainment. They rented a theater next to the two used by opponents and showed excerpts from such cable -TV productions as a Dirk Cavett magic show and Raquel Welch's nightclub act. And they drummed up community backing through talks to the ¢Iwanis Club and other local organizations. Wichita Falls voters tamed out W record numbers. Cable TV won by a two -to -one m. tio. Similar battles between cable -TV sup- porters and their opponents are being ward In other communities. But the most bitter fights often Involve companies vying for lu- crative cable -TV franchLses that are up for bid In a growing number of clues. The competition Is cutthroat, noholda-barred," says Harold Horn, executive director of the Cable Television Information Center, a sat. profit group that has consu ted with 1,700 cities on cable -TV matters. MlBlofia at state . At stake in scores of cities from gopme to Seattle are cable -TV franchises worth minions of dollars a year. "There's hardly a major city that Isn't In the midst of this," Mr. Horn says. The franchise lights, however. are spawning Practices that worry some Indus. try officials. Robert Schmidt, former presi- dent of the National Cable Television Asso- clation, an Industry trade group, says he Is concerned that cable -Tv companies may Promise services that can't be provided eco- nomically, He also is apprehensive that "Companies, In the heat of competition, could resort to some U the tactics of the IM." Back then, at least one cable -TV ex- ecutive larded In jail for bribing city am. cials to obtain a franchise. Until recently, the cable -TV Industry has been hanrtrung N what kind of program. ming It could offer by severe restrictions the Federal Communications Commission lea. posed In 1872 to curb abuses and to protect local broadcasters. But the commission is liftif many of those riles, allowing compa- nies to offer a wider variety of prograos that Is making cable TV attractive to cur tomers In urban areas, even though they al. ready may receive a large number of regu- lar TV channels. The basic cable -TV service provides Im- proved reception from local stations and dB' nats from stations in distant cities that can't be received through the air. For a moolkly fee, homes are United to a cable that brlep In the TV signal. For an additions) in, vlesrere can receive pay-cable TV. which of- ten cor nMW-het movkv, Sports and other programa woft the Loeala Fust, however, the cable -TV companies; often must overcome opposition from com- mercW TV broadcasters and movie-tbeater maers to persuade Weal governments to al- low cable operations. Indeed, the battle In Wichita Falls occurred atter the city esund had already awarded a franchise to a unit of Time Inc.'s American Television k Commlu- nicailm Inc. Local broadcasters led the op- position, demanding and getting a referent. dant on the decision. When a city decide$ to award a cable -TV hatoise, companies compete with various strategies. In Springfield, Mo., for example, cable competitors arranged for he trips by cltycmmcB members to Inspect cable -TV systems W such places as San Francisco, Sul Diego, New Orleans, Denver and Or. ]socio, FIL, according to veronica Ffkdlas, a Springfield resident who kept tabs on the city's franchise process. Perhaps the most widespread tactic is vital is known In the Industry as the "rat-a- cttizen" ploy, In which applicants for fras- chim remdt kcal buten who we wslt- known a who have political , ... _. Occasionally, the local people bwA a a" Interest W the company, an Inmsat dot can become a bonanza If the compney whe the franchise. Sometimes the notables "are jad along for window dressing," says Painsls Miller, vice president of a company affiliated with Storer Broadcasting Co. that Is vybsg for the cable -TV franchise In basketballvM Ler Ington, Ky. One of her mmpsays.comped- fors enlisted University of Kentucky basket - bell coach Joe B. Hall and one of the sten of his 1978 national ciamplenWp team, Jack Givens. To show off Its portable cam- eras, motile studio vans and satellite pro- gramming, Mrs. Miller's company rented tI1CROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB EEOAR RAPIDS -DES 1101nFs the [Lapp Arrow, the basketball team's n,- ooPseat home named after Adolph Rupp, the revered turner coach. Raab In the Region IM1dmtl 11 companies stress their local ere. Alexandria, VL, near washing - W94 An official of cos local cable -TV W. cant said he altaady'bW bought bla YrW Plot In town. An officer of another company, former FCC Chairman Frederick Ford, bolded of bus Me as Mortimer In a local pm&ftm of "Aramis and Old lace." The city couch recently awarded the franchise to Alexandria Cablevlslon Co., which the city's technical consultant had rated as the beat applicant The company's .mmfl member. sad Its President Includesa former majority leader Of the MM here of deleptaa Otk. em affiliated with the company Include for. mer Attorney General Richard IGelodelnst and ee Flemming, a on hint Ude to dn The outcome of the fraerkUe fight rayed a few eyebrows because the winner t the company that the city's financial comi- tant and cable -TV administrator had recon- mended. Ice Bertrnen, the consultant W ileves that "Political considerations played a role" In the selection. But cable -TV Fran. chLsing "Ls a political process." he says. "That's Just the way It Is in every city." So far, there doesn't seem to be any hard evidence that bribery hes returned as a tac- tic to obtain franchises. But the hot demand for cable TV has attracted some fast -buck artists. Fwmatme hitch Several months ago, for example, Tele - View Productions distributed leaflets In Philadelphia neighborMods promising toeut 70% off the cat of Installing cable TV for those who signed up for the service quickly. Within three days, about 1,000 cable-hugry people gave tlnusentis of dollars to Tele, View. They had Just one problem. Nobody had been given a franchise to set up a cable -TV system In those parts of town. William Clancy of Newfoundland, Pa., had an even bigger problem City officials say he Is the man behind the leaflets, and they accuse him of attempting "a major shakedown U Phlladelphla residents," Mr. Clancy pleaded guilty to fraud charges. Among legitimate cable -TV companies, the overpromising of facilities that some ob. servers fear Is rampant, Industry officials say. The extravagant promises may include agreements to provide extensive local faclll. ties, a large number of channels and two. 19f/ way systems that permit viewer participa- tion. There Is a feeling in the industry that companies will "do and say and promise anything to get the franchise," says Jobe Evans, vice president of Arlington Telecom- munications; Corp., which operates a able - TV system In Arlington, Va. "Once a hatl- chise is awarded, there's little a city can do.' As In Wichita Falls, though, the battle over cable -TV franchises and services can continue even after a franchise has been granted. In Monroeville. Pa., two residents whose lawyer had a financial stake In an on - successful franchise applicant sued the win- ner, an affiliate of Time's American Televi- sion t Communications, or ATC, charging that It had committed perjury In Ifs applica- tions. According to the lawsuit, ATC sale it had a color studio in Lynchburg, Va., when a studio hadn't yet been built. C. Reggie Whitley, a Lynchburg city oln- cial, confirm that Is February, when ATCs application was submitted, the company hadn't built a studio. Construction began later only after numerous meeting between the company asci city omelets, he nays. at- y<ouneil members had "considerable con - em," Mr. Whitley uys, that "the services oritMvty Promised (in 1sT!) weren't being delivered." ATC officials blame the construction de- lay on the FCC and the city council. "There was absolutely no problern with our filing In Monroeville," says Joseph CoWns, ATC vice president for Bohm operations. June Travb, vice president for administration, adds, "We fed we're In compliance (with the Lynchburg franchise ordinance). We're had our equipment there." One reason for such confusion Is that lo- cal goverment officials rain aren't famD- lar with the new and frequently complex is- sues related to able -TV operations. In Pittsburgh, city offlcWs ran Into prob- lems even before the city decided to start the franchise process. Jamea VAlilams., u electrician, Ned an application for u else. trical permit while the city was pondering What 10 do about cable TV. The city permit department, Oinking Mr. Williams wu making a regular some roc tW wort, Issued tl the permiplication to t. a While, city authorities realized that Mr. MI. Hams had applied to set up a able -TV sys- tem, Andthey revoked the permit. "We were In the huddle," a city official uya, "ate 02 guy picked up the ball and ran for It tounhdowT." MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 110INES d The Building Line Volume 25 IM, MICROEILMEB By JORM MICROLAB 1nA;: uAPIfiS•al "Uiljf11 October 1979 X MARKS THE SPOT ATTENTION; During mid-September you may have noticed some sidewalks marked with a small flourescont orange,X BUILDERS AND DESIGNERS approximately 211 by 12" in size. This was done to accommodate a:'sidewalk repair program in 1979 UNIFORM CODES COMING IN SPRING the south central,part.of Iowa City with some federal money. The major area of inspection was The 1979 Uniform Codes including the Building Code, south, of Burlington Street to the rail- Plumbing Code, Mechanical Code and Fire Code road tracks and east:of Gilbert Street to First Avenue, The are presently under review by the City Community Development Block Grant Program allocated $84,500 to staff and various advisory boards have, 2000 squares of sidewalk replaced. prior to submission to the City Council for adoption late in In`developing'this program the Division Spring of 1980. of Building designed some standards for sidewalk, replacement.These standards There are several major changes in the will; soon be submitted to Council for new Building Code, the most significant of which is the elim- their approval and will be enforced city- wide not only for the CDBG program but : ination of construction require - for any sidewalk that we feel needs to be replaced. ments by fire zone. The 1979 Code now regulates' the design of build - The ,standards- that were used - for this - ings on their intended use and con - program are as follows: struction•types. Uniform codes are 1 Whenever there.is an elevation differ - developed by' the International Conference of.'Building"Officials once greater than.3/4" between, one piece of concrete and and because they affect the ma' r - o, another. ity of :the:cities:'west of the.a" Whenever aof sidewalk is Mississippi River, local reviewissquare essentialpriorto'adoption -so that greater than 50% spalded or has a local amendments.canbe..made;to, the spald or, chip; greater than 1/210 in depth and 5" in length. Code to allow for construction practices and environmental:con- 3 Whenever a control joint has a crack ditions that are unique not only to the midwest but to Iowa and specifiw larger than'l" or there is a crack cally,Iowa City. larger than 1/411.in.a square or whenever a'square is -.cracked into 4 With the high volume of non- re.si- or more pieces. dential work currently being planned 4. Whenever there is a piece of side- essential to provide about>in Iowa City, we thought.it six walk missing greater than :4" in any months notice to builders and archi- two directions. tects so that construction_ projects' 1. S. Whenever one or more squares has a scheduled for building permit review after June 1, will be sl slope greater than 3" in four feet, .1980 designed to be in conformance with 6, Whenever repairs are possible they the 1979 Code. must be made with an approved latex - bonding, Any person or organization having suggestions regarding Code changes Currently Iowa City has an ordinance for they would like to have the Board of Appeals and the City Council sidewalk replacement, however, the ordin- consider may refer their written ance does not address any design criteria recommendations to the Building for that replacement. These standards 'developed Official for forwarding to the were to provide that criteria Building Board of Appeals. And, In the near future, will be utilized throughout the City. If you should have The City has placed copies of the any question concerning the criteria 1979 codes for citizen review at used for the sidewalk repair program, the Iowa City building permit please contact Jerry Denison at the counter, the City Clerk's office Division of Building. and the Iowa City Public Library. IM, MICROEILMEB By JORM MICROLAB 1nA;: uAPIfiS•al "Uiljf11 STATISTICS MINIMUM HOUSING BUILDING INSPECTION During August, 1979, 92 structures were During the month -of -August, 1979, 70 Build - inspected containing 513 dwelling units ing Permits, 21 Mechanical Permits, 20 ' and 98 rooming.units.._In addition, 138 Plumbing Permits, and 46 Electrical Permits reinspections were conducted. 248 dwell- have been issued by the City. The total ing units and 132 rooming units were value of all August construction in Iowa` found to be in compliance with the Mini- City is $5,266,830. There were 3 demo- mum Housing Code of Iowa City. lition permits issued. HOUSING ASSISTANCE PROGRAM * *r Plumbing tests will.be"given at '7:00 p;M. * , During August, 1979, 6 units were brought *, on October 17, 1979: at the ,Civic Center. .*t into the Section; 8, Program. *Practical tests for successful journeymen ,* * will :be'given at'7:00 P:M: on`October 24` Total units;'Section 8 = 338. �* at R. M. Boggs shop at 2804 Industrial - * Park Road:'. Applications must be`in,by * October 15. L: 1 a ( 1 i Y 1 � i / + - •I 1 1 rV f ^ f 1 1 i 1 1 SSI aNllw,ad _- ObZ s emol•45eNm e01b YMOI AIIA VM01MoJ QIVd ,�a;uag oiAlO saoiAJaS uo[4oadsul pue 39111SOd'S'0 6%snoH jo 4uaw;.aeda0 fit3lltlH Sm emol';o An MICROFILMED By JORM MICROLAB CEf7AP RAPI')S.DF "O:IIES City of Iowa City Department of Housing JIM >ull and Inspection Services U. g POSTAGE Civic Center PAID 410 E. Washington Iowa City, Iowa 52240 IOWA CI TYTY, , IOWA A Permit 155 i i i i { C it 1 I ' I (I f .'� •`.6q'MI.,aq 4snw suot;eotLddV 5peoag3Jed"" * tetj snPuI b08Z,,Ie dogs..s66og •W •a 4e ,, 'U 0'W'd 00:L.3e,.uant6'a9 'BEE 8 uotl3aS.fs3tun Le;ol - LLLM ." .*!UB aW 0 i; Ln;ssaaons. ao�. s�sa; Le5t3oeld * +, --•we,a6o.ad`8 uo13gag a41: o;ui ' to;ua0 otn}0 a4;•,4e 6L61 ;.'LL Aagoioo-uo ; * 346no.aq aaaM s;tun 9 `6L6L 41sn6ny 6utjri0 +W d,00,1 3e uant6 q ,tttM s4sa4,6utgwntd ; **��*" ***+++►*•+w*Iry*�*+rrx**r+��r*�***+�s+cxx*i : WV8908d 30NVISISSV 9NIS110H pansst sltutaad uotltL -owap g ataM aaa41 :•0E8'9gzlSs st A';tO o 6u sno wow '4310 eMo P 0 t H. uL ,a 1. eMot ut uOt4:)na suoa sn6n = V:Lte anten - dw o L W 43 g3un aouettdwoa ut.aq o4 puno3 , as " "Le3o3.a41 'aO Aq Pansst uOut anid ataM s3 tun 6utwoOJ Ut Pue s3tun';6ut -LIaMP M 'Pa4onpuoo 0 P s31w.aad leata;oaL3"96 Pue;`slLwlad.6utgwnLd a.laM suot3aadsutaa 8ET`'uollIppe ul -PL MflZOL5�6W ad [sn6neyoaW 13 `s3twd6d 6ut y ..S4�un 6utwooi 86 PUP s3tun.6uttLaMP Elg 6utute3uo� pa3Dadsut ;o, 43uow a44.6utin0 a.aaM sain3an.a3s U ' 6L6i-13sn6ny 6utin' N0I103dSNI Milling 9NIS00' N— W—(IWjNIW -" S�I1S11111S J MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB cEnne . 4)II+Is W i parks & recreation MEMO department to: Neal Berlin and City Council from • Dennis Showalter re. Cemetery Wall date .October 10, 1979 As you may know, we have fixed the worst section of the Oakland Cemetery wall, the.E-W walls along the old driveway, that were leaning and in danger of collapsing. We wish now to start work on the worst section of the N -S wall along Governor Street. We wish to follow the plan shown on Exhibit I, which will cover the sidewalk. We propose to build a new sidewalk across the street, from Ronalds to Brown, to re2lace the existing sidewalk on the East side. 1 I have met with Hugh Mose regarding bus loading and unloading, he doesn't feel f that it will cause him any problems. I have talked personally with the 2 adacent property owners and they have no objection. j The cost of the sidewalk is estimated to be $896.00 for materials (Exhibit 2), t with Park crews doing the work. If we were to build a new cemetery wall on the East side the estimated cost would be $175 to $200 per foot. Th the operating budget. The cost of the wall project (FigureaI)896.00 will beial come from $5 per foot, as we have the fill material on hand, and will do the work withxParkely crews. If You have no objections, we will proceed with this project this fall. I MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES NOIRES 1483 0 I CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOINES 11 POWER POLE f PROPOSED FILL 1,5 �c`Qy ? STONE WALL 3.5 GOVEROR ST. SIDEWALK (TO BE REMOVED) 5 TYPICAL SECTION CEMETERY WALL REPAIR SCALE I = 4 CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOINES --)City of Iowa Cites MEMORANDUM Date: September 21, 1979 To: Dennis Showalter, Director of Parks & Recreation From: Frank Farmer, Civil Engineer Re: Sidewalk on Governor Street - Westside - Ronalds to Brown Attached please find a copy of estimated cost for the sidewalk on Governor Street. The lower estimate is for the park crews doing the work and is for material only. The higher cost is as if the work would be contracted out to a private contractor. If you have any questions, please call. bj5/7 MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOINES X2.1/ �! CITY OF IOWA CITY, IOWA � ESTIMATE OF COST Date Sco�. Zo /979 Project 87, .6w4 k cation'_ a V- Et. — Well .S' t% i i I Qaanti ty unit Item -Unit Price Cost LZ 0 S, w.lk D 690.00 3 ESL CW r b D1-. s o 00 20. 00 wr k 6 P k 17 Cu. Jr. PC. Cep c + k C- 3 ri 38.00 or „ a .n e r S,. kes Cr , ,r;, / Oo / CO . OD Total: de by iecked by Approved by�5�LL//�l�v�G Titlecl.zy, L77 1 171 CA -t- Date 9-20-99 MICROFILMED BY g JORM MICROLAB i CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 140114ES AGENDA OF PROPERTIES CITY COUNCIL TOUR OCTOBER 15, 1979 1:30 p.m. - 624 N. Linn - Iva Helleman, Manager Application for a housing permit was made by Mrs. Iva Hellman on August 8, 1979. This property was inspected by Inspector Brian Kuebler on August 21 and Mrs. Helleman received a Notice of Violation i on August 24. One of the violations cited on that notice was lack of required ceiling height in dining room, bedroom, and kitchen of Apt. 2. This violation has been appealed by Mrs. Helleman who states that an improper interpretation of Chapter 17-6(d) of the Housing Code has been made. 2:00 p.m. - 915 E. Washington - Willie Wulf, Manager - Rosalie Campbell, Owner This property was inspected by Inspector Kuebler on June 21, 1979 and subsequent to that inspection, he issued a Notice of Violation on July 6 to Ms. Rosalie Campbell; owner, in care of Mr. Willie Wulf. Again, he cited lack of required ceiling height in the third floor dwelling unit. This case was appealed by Mr. Wulf and Ms. Campbell and heard by the Housing Appeals Board on September 27, 1979. The decision of that hearing was that a violation did, in fact, exist and the Appeals Board upheld the Notice of Violation as written. 2:30 p.m. - 331 S. Johnson - Robert Bender, Owner Mr. Robert Bender made application for a housing permit on July 10, 1979. An inspection was conducted by Inspector Kuebler on July 18, 1979. On July 27, Mr. Bender received this Notice of Violation. Among the violations cited was Chapter 17-4(a)(2)(c) Improper Handrails. Chapter 9.30.N.2.(d) Lack of Required Guardrails was also cited as a violation. Both the handrails and guardrails are located in the foyer area of this building and after an administrative review, the violation regarding the handrails was dismissed. The violation of lack of required guardrails remains, in that, the guardrails on the interior stairway are approximately six inches too low. 2:50 p.m. - 320-322 S. Johnson - Donald Griffin, Owner This property was inspected on August 17, 1979 by Housing Inspector David Malone and Senior Housing Inspector Terry Steinbach due to several neighborhood complaints. A Notice of Intent to Placard was issued and hand -delivered to Mr. Griffin on August 23. Mr. Griffin requested a hearing before the Housing Appeals Board and his case was heard on October 11, 1979. The Housing Appeals Board upheld the Notice of Intent to Placard as written. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 110HIES 110 W 3:00 p.m. - 3 E. Harrison - Ron Johnson, Owner This property was inspected on July 19, 1978 by Inspector Pamela Barnes. A Notice of Violation was issued to Mr. Johnson and received by him on July 31, 1978. Of the violations cited, those which remain as of Inspector Kuebler's last reinspection on August 30 are; lack of fire extinguishers, lack of second means of egress, and steps not maintained in a good state of repair. This property and the occupants have been made eligible and have been certified for rent escrow. bdw/sp FIICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOINES ■* ORDER TO CORRECT COKDITION OF PREMISES CITY OF IOWA CITY CIVIC CENTER 410 E. WASHINGTON ST. IOWA CITY IOWA 52240 (319) 354.18030 DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND INSPECTION SERVICES August 23, 1373 !;CTICE OF VICILATIU_t Iva 'I. l;i ll�rian rentals by Ivatte 5 -55 Sox 576 Io+a City, Joua 52240 -7 Re: 624 11. Linn, 7 Dtirallia; U, -its Dear rs. Piilej,an: The abova listed proparty was inspected on August 21, 1y79, by Lriar; Wabler, housins Inspector, Lepartrrnt of )'.ousing and Ins,:cctioM Services The folioring it. --ms aro. violations of Chapter 17 of the !,unicipal Codc of Ioua City and are hereby Droug:a to your attention fur correction: 1. Chapttr g.3G.11.i:. Lack of valid itulti,le rjaullinc Fcm.it. a. Lac): of valid pcmit. 2. Chapt.2r 9.30.G.2.(L,) Lada of required handrails. a. Front iurch steps lack second handrail. b. front ste?s to sidewalr, lack second handrail. c. Lack of safety teninals on ;:andrail in a,artrent 2. u. Lack of safety tanainals cn handrail bet�xcn first and second floors. 3. Ch_pter 17-10(n) Laci, of ap roved fire extinguisher. E. No fire extinguish^_r in Z,,SrtL;9nt :li,• C;iapt=r17-5(g)(i) Lack of Sic:; ate verailation. a. EXhanSt fan in apt, lA is not }•arLing. Chapter17-7(h)(1) Inadequate design of PiuP+bing. a. Faucet in apt. 3 bath tub projects below ria of tui;. 6. Chapter 17-7(a) Coiling not caintained in a t U state of re air. a. Paint is p__elinq off ceiling in batiroor.. of apt. 4. ��XJW- NT AY'mLB1r, MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOIRES i I i i I i j i j I j i ORDER TO CORRECT COKDITION OF PREMISES CITY OF IOWA CITY CIVIC CENTER 410 E. WASHINGTON ST. IOWA CITY IOWA 52240 (319) 354.18030 DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND INSPECTION SERVICES August 23, 1373 !;CTICE OF VICILATIU_t Iva 'I. l;i ll�rian rentals by Ivatte 5 -55 Sox 576 Io+a City, Joua 52240 -7 Re: 624 11. Linn, 7 Dtirallia; U, -its Dear rs. Piilej,an: The abova listed proparty was inspected on August 21, 1y79, by Lriar; Wabler, housins Inspector, Lepartrrnt of )'.ousing and Ins,:cctioM Services The folioring it. --ms aro. violations of Chapter 17 of the !,unicipal Codc of Ioua City and are hereby Droug:a to your attention fur correction: 1. Chapttr g.3G.11.i:. Lack of valid itulti,le rjaullinc Fcm.it. a. Lac): of valid pcmit. 2. Chapt.2r 9.30.G.2.(L,) Lada of required handrails. a. Front iurch steps lack second handrail. b. front ste?s to sidewalr, lack second handrail. c. Lack of safety teninals on ;:andrail in a,artrent 2. u. Lack of safety tanainals cn handrail bet�xcn first and second floors. 3. Ch_pter 17-10(n) Laci, of ap roved fire extinguisher. E. No fire extinguish^_r in Z,,SrtL;9nt :li,• C;iapt=r17-5(g)(i) Lack of Sic:; ate verailation. a. EXhanSt fan in apt, lA is not }•arLing. Chapter17-7(h)(1) Inadequate design of PiuP+bing. a. Faucet in apt. 3 bath tub projects below ria of tui;. 6. Chapter 17-7(a) Coiling not caintained in a t U state of re air. a. Paint is p__elinq off ceiling in batiroor.. of apt. 4. ��XJW- NT AY'mLB1r, MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOIRES fi 1 � i i i 1 ) I I I i E 1 r I i I i ( i i i I I Iva ;;. Iiitte•:a^. ,-, Linn 2 7. CL•arter 17-b(d) LCL of required ceiling heicht. a. Ceiling in dining ruo:, bedroow and kitchen of apt. 2 is I:, -ll under Vie required hcigtlt. You Will hove ninety (90) days after receipt of this notice to correct these deficiencies. At that ticw: a rciuspection %rill be carried out to ilisure aeae eo;-,;;iiancet Shol;ld YOU Trish to contest any of these orders, your txittt:n petitica reglr_stin-c; a Nearing Lefure Vle housing Apy=als Loard Frust be received in the Of rice of tile City Clerk 4rit.;in ten (10) days of service of t;lis notice. Your petition for a i;earing r.Rrst briefly state the grounds for yolr appeal. If you have, any questions, please feel free to call }busing Inspection at 3354-1;w, extension 314 or 34;. Sincerely, Lrlau Kuebler Housing Inspector bice/1-2 BE, Sell DCCUMBNT O SENDER: Complete lmms 1,-'. and J. Add Your address in the "RETURN TO" spice on 19 3 rtrer: 1. TheJolIn%ing service is requested (check one). >L7 Show to whom and date delivered.....'.. fJ Show to whom, dam, and addrms of del iver•.. y a e RESTRICTED DF.LIVERl' Show to u.hum and dale delivered......... M RESTRICTED DELIVERY. Show to u.hom, date, and address of delivery. $__ (CONSULT POSTMASTER FOR FEES) T. ARTICLE ADDRESSED TO: ++t I1TarCL, 3 ARTICLE DESCRIVTION: REGISTERED N0. ,L/IEI CERTED NO INSURED NO. i — 17GI�; i I (Alwap onbin tianature os Wdrtua of •Anel ! 1 have received the article described above. SIGNATURE AUdr we ❑ Authorized apeni e c� ITY _ DATE or DELIVERY 0 K l- 5. AD KESS ICampbteantTd tqui led Ngo 6. UNABLE TO DELIVER BECAUSE- A �S IAL[. kq A�\J FIiCROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 140111ES �� ^ }arae u+• assn 1� a a c )RQER TO CORRECT Cip DITION OF PREMISES CITY OF IOWA CITY CIVIC CENTER 410 E. WASHINGTON ST. IOWA CITY IOWA 52240 (319) 354.180D DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND INSPECTION SERVICES .hely 6, 1979 JX;i I(T C?:' '7ItiLT:PI(:.: %, •� '*salia axr,tx�li c/o S"iIiv l%,If. / 7.35 I.p_%G-rto:1 Icl:a Cita , la,a 522:0 I 915 T... s;11.>>irx tn,. R Z: ��li J.. 1:i.SyiTCltOR Pa :^ 2 sr. mar%ter 17-90,1)tcY.uv7r.. ryat ra-intalrvA in c,p7 %joet2nj W.-IlitiaH. a. All unit ti lae' f' roairg Es:ri:c dLtcotozc. 7. jae,.of r,.v2-rr-4 lo: i r.• :3rrice on 6xrs/cir.9ars. r„ JLC: o-` wirr"o;1 iodal in varicrm daces on first floor. ti•.;� r/p. �wp;:rr 17-{(r) Jam: of rcguirc3 crilizg ,iz; Floor c•+cllin- unit lr?:s a»rcc:istcly 7' o` renrim'i r_cilirc, hei?ht. q, a-nrter 17-7(a) Halls mt raint;sne, in a ,x3 state of repair. a. Fe^? ing r, int iz !>,llMsv L -rt ..k-^^ s c Y i ora thi-d floors. 10. Oia ter 9.30.7.F.1. J: c,: of m: *red electrical light c•.+itch. n. ;Idn.i floor latdhoo - livi:x; roc-: lar_•:, 1 sato;. }�. _hir 4 floor )x3rmy lies n s.:itch, r.. fl—conA, floor slutwcst bxirasa lads l.s::it^h. d. uccnl flair r;o t )3td» lads 1 witch. e. 9.xro^3 Floor rnztucast living ra%.r lad:r 1 maitel. f. Soot r' floor mrt}areat be �•c:ta la^_rs 1 switch. 11. om-_ter 17-7(1)7. L-tCi: of mfuim-i olec rival cutlet. a. First lcr_r dinL-r. rccn l -:75:o ar- outl.-.t. h. Seco:r.? flair Y.ithen lades o»A 011let. yrrl will have nim-ty (90) dgy.r,, -Ft(--r rccnirt of thi.. notica to crcr-r t At t.I it tine a rr_ ra ccUor. will 1x car (0 alt to Lnsuze cor3c m-pl i'mc :. Heol? =au Yr_�� rainrst asr� of txae U:CJZF,, }7i written ;vatic, M-j1w?StL-rT a Heari]YI }XZUrc the }sCY.::1.Yf id.T,p xls oa a 1. 7t be rc-cpiw"l in Uc Office o`- Lhc City Clog v:ie:ir, ten (10) dz!,rZ of s'n�ico o` Uus .oticv. z&= rr-tition for a I;oaring -mt bric::ly stat(- t;e, q.r for yo,x a^, If yo:r hs ^e •-?: err: ions, vlc, .•o f 3cl .^.rM. is Gll Fo;i i rl In_=r_Uc. ,at 3:4-1Fn0, mtere;im 314 or 3441. Si-r_ercly, ^rias Faiebler 1 ail/E-5 ' BEST DOCUM.ENT A MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOIRES t j I l i j i h' I e I. i i t I' I f I I i I I J ,R • aL\NhW Eun.pkto dons I.:. a�J?-�� Add your aJJrrw in Inc' kLI L % TO'lr.,, on 3 reren 7 1. The fWlnwin); sorter is myoesled (chmL one). rhnw m whom and date dehsered.. El Show' to whom. dine, and address of deli,try .ted RF.STRICTI:D DELIVERY Show to whom and date delisered......... RESTRICTED DELIVERY. c Show to whom• dale, and address of del,,,ry S_ \i (CONSULT POSTMASTER FOR FEES) t. ARTICLE ADORES To Z 3. ARTICLE DESCRIPTI(�1! x REGISTERED N0. n CERTIFIED NO. I INSURED NO. �P37a�C m r (At"" nbraln eanaNre of addn. rirawntl D I have received the article ei I rr/above. SIGNATURE 0 Aldo, 1L, y IJr AuI rigid agent D ' N a. DATE OF DELIVERYad D P i 5. ADDRESS (Complslr onl it rr D r R,rerl. m r' y r fl s 7 m 6. UNABLE TO DELIVER BECAUSE: Q� I LER LS O j d LCI- ,i: G��+J.S�1V11Y��}BL'+a MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 140111ES ORDER TO CORRECT COADITION OF PREMISES CITY CSF IOW/\ CITY CIVIC CENTER 410 E. WASHINGTON ST. IOWA CITY IOWA 52240 (319) 354.180D DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND INSPECTION SERVICES July 24, 1979 2'1idCt; (!F' !TIOi.71^_'I4.•: %/f" 335 S. Cli±?.m Icla City, 11µ.-a 527.40 331 s. JONI -1, 9 1^.uollir3 l nits Ccar IL-. Inn er: X13 ri12i1'.•� listr_�-TCr_.1CrCv 17r _^. { P 111 actf�9 m rTul 11', 197n. '. ;� i'rim 2 1eSler, izrusin3 In :x to.^^, iY�3rtri.tt of '_c isilr.. ar:i In^,-rct4" Se^=c c. T1e fello.imp it l are violatix2 of [;„mer 1 a e.� 7 c_ t.._ :1fa.`ticic,al. Co"R4 o` Ix;n City 43 arc c=u'r.• 11_•-rrht to .'o%r atrs-lticn; for o)rrcction: 1. Cr;n^tns 9.30.1LT.. :.aCi: of. rnli� !b�lti_Ac n;�llillg FM�1•rit a. Iod. o v.Ilid p^_r at. _. Cl;?tcr17 4(i)(2)c L -.-.-;r ccx !1ar'railc. r.. Iztcrior stairs hanirnil lar;%; s 'cam: to ni'als. 3 t^s 9.30.'.:.2. (cl) La&X o_`t rcla_n,�-i a. C.1.zrentil cn intsrior stair e -Li t is:i µicy r_•r' la:. 4. c1 1*17-10(1)(2) 1'r -M„ mt t:;i�tei _.r. in �. i :talc oP rc^air. a. 7,ccrss to `im exsx� x eget ire i hlovcc:. by rH�loc•c:? _._-L".a dcmr. 5. Ovantcr 17-7(.) rMAccti•,e electric- :Isp un. a. •_11er.^_ is e\T,0±ce! wirLn1 hlorr, in nnjt-ri`a t 1YtuTY_`:1 of [. Ch; tee.- 177 1' i7alls not ; iat:i;'3 i1 n c CS state; o° rc=ir. F.. N'>t. is has PC-31i;r' ,lint In the ScUtJ'T7nr1t 7. CnsJtc 17 -?(i) Ivprq-,er 1r,: o` cxrxts. a. f1^re it Mozart' wiri;): in livi17rG7. Or F7'.7t. 02. BEST DOCUMENT AVAILABLE MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES 331 S. Joanv;,;n ra-ic 2 You will lixre, nir..?ty (10) eayn aftsr receipt of Udc mice to corre.-t Uses: d:.`icianciez;. ?.t 01-:11, tilxv a reir,.^rc:tion will ;on, carried. out to ino^IL'e Code QJ:'i7Urbnce. e" U'lld V(r: wish to contest any of t1e3e ort:c•rca, ya+s written petition L3'.jU(!Y,ti.n3 a ^e.:Llhg Sr,:e%re the lield9il?] T;:KT_^e?1`3 n3 —d ,:west ho r'[:SiV•"S in tie Lvffica of the City Clark lli&.in ten (10) clays o� r^?rl:io2 of t1daa notice. your r)atitionn for a llezrsrirx; rust. briefly state the gmrr s for ycri a,-:,x:al. If VCGr )lens m, ,la^_stions, clna:: feel free t,-) c, -:ll Fknzing In!:F-ection at 354-1&CG, c:tc cion 314 or 34f. Sivr_rcly, T�rLan }:ucilcr - nnkxiTT;a ingp&'-tor irj r.110,11 q SENDER: Cumplele item{ I,=.and 3. ,I 1. The following service is rn(uestad (,hcek one). / P*Shaw m whom and date delivered. ....... 't r P Show to whom and date delivered.........._q C] RESTRICTED DELIVERY. Show to whom• date, and address of deliv Iry. S— (CON5DLT POSTMASTER FOR FE S) � � 6 �_ •�dz��.t o(�ir ,5'ZZ.yo�'zz.yo 3. ARTICLE DESCRIPTION: REGISTERED fi0.CERTIEICD N0. INSURED NO. �d 3�oaC� , IAlwan obbin dpnavn o4ddresw onp,nil I have rectivird-ithr article described above. r A I POSTN 7_ a%7 �tV IA G 5. ADDRESS (Compote only if nau. t.d) ' L 1 i 4 A I I 1 I' I I I I 1 I L' q SENDER: Cumplele item{ I,=.and 3. Add your add,m In the ••RFTURI: TO" {peer on rtverr. 1. The following service is rn(uestad (,hcek one). / P*Shaw m whom and date delivered. ....... 't Show to whom, date, and address of delivery. ._e E] RESTRICTED DELIVERY Show to whom and date delivered.........._q C] RESTRICTED DELIVERY. Show to whom• date, and address of deliv Iry. S— (CON5DLT POSTMASTER FOR FE S) 1. ARTICLE ADDRESSED TO: �_ •�dz��.t o(�ir ,5'ZZ.yo�'zz.yo 3. ARTICLE DESCRIPTION: REGISTERED fi0.CERTIEICD N0. INSURED NO. �d 3�oaC� , IAlwan obbin dpnavn o4ddresw onp,nil I have rectivird-ithr article described above. dressee 'dspent SIGNAZX19��- A OATDELIVERY POSTN 7_ a%7 �tV IA G 5. ADDRESS (Compote only if nau. t.d) ' `v`� 6, UNABLE TO DELIVER BECAUSE!LCRK'S� i TIALS MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 1101flES I I. l � I I Y ❑ Show to whom, date. and address of del iter•.._• i Show to whom and dale delivered .......... —s RESTRICTED DELIVERY. Show to whom, date, and address of dclir fir•. $— (CONSOLT POSTMASTER FOR FE5) III O 2. ARTICLE ADDRESSED 7�//�.Ff I, I a I I i I h»'e rreeis' I article described above. I t I I i i L POST NJ I I ' - rAv:rt L... ' r .tet • 331 S. Jormscs ra7c 2 Ycra will )Ism rirclty (90) cay5 after receipt of tFit::r-.tira to correct the&% 6CfiCiC;-4if::a. At that ti+x• z rLi .-yc:tion ;,rill 1;o^_c,arriai Out to ir'Ta-C Ccacl Ca-.23innce. ald ycra ITiah to contest arct., of these orr:c-ra, ya s written tk tt ian ra- ,=-.ting a ro:sing lvfore the ;iousi.ng 7• i> els rcx-ml rest L -e ruo'_A%*CK] ir. t.o Cffiao of the City 0 --ml, llitlin ter. (10) Bays Of mar ic_ of t)Lis notico. ycL- notition for a i_enri:x.; mist briefly stale the cro:'e4 for your I: w7i hive vry E, `tions, plea:,-_ fee!] tree to cz11 Baring In;�ectir+n at 35411POG, extension 314 or 34F. SL-urscly, D. -L -n }:Dc51cr ):wsLrl );jgiC-1.1 , BEST p0C1)1AEN'TT B5 at a SENDER: Cunpletenens 1,-, and 3. Add your addreu in the ••RFTURN TO" space on mer:. I. The following sers'icis ra(uested (check one). � Ll- ow to whom and date delivered.......... ❑ Show to whom, date. and address of del iter•.._• E] RESTRICTED DELIVERY Show to whom and dale delivered .......... —s RESTRICTED DELIVERY. Show to whom, date, and address of dclir fir•. $— (CONSOLT POSTMASTER FOR FE5) III O 2. ARTICLE ADDRESSED 7�//�.Ff 3. ARTICLE DESCRIPTION: a REGISTERED NO. CERTIFIED N0. INSURED NO. I (AlweYa ahNin aipnemn of eddntw or ewnsl I h»'e rreeis' I article described above. SIGNATOR Addressee ❑ Aulh d agecnnl a. DAT OF DELIVERY POST NJ 7 G S. ADDRESS (Complete only if nauested) 6. UNABLE TO DELIVER BECAUSE' LCRI� ,IALS MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS. DES MOIIIES n I ORDER TO CORRECT CONDITION OF PREMISES CITY U� 10\/VA CITY CIVIC CENTER 410 E. WASHINGTON ST. IOWA CITY IOWA 52240 (319) 354.180D DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND INSPECTION SERVICES Au,lir,t 22, 1979 WI' 1. !11'. .1 TO 11r, scnald s riffbl 320 S. Joti+i_.wn ;;tenet ia4zt CiL: ,=r..;:a 5,2240 SERVICE OF NOTICE DATE ' L ' , -• 1 DELt1'IAED TO,/ `/ ) /1 ey / t -f_ L i IlOUSING INSPECTION DIVISION ^c: 3 c3r.•llin7 unfits (C,:cCpt 3rd rom frrr. seat saro.•ri flror mxt)s si,le) lacwtri at 320-22 S..Wnn_cs.•s ASliS L-1:`,:tC.1a:: l:•L^ CC;):7'J'_trd as a:::.';rat='i caS 'rr-rr, -i_ r vay 11a•:C orcorret :1lle to t110 stnrx'ic c* r.ursm:ti effe.tz withLa all F.r•_llinj LIDits i ie a1xa'a 11str2.' ,.rrla:rty ims'irx;-,cc c9 m T�r1uL't 17, VM, 17 Davi . lra : lor>n, 1:ousina Z^ ,x ta., inti rt^.nt of Hou -sing in! Ins. cw tion :'erric:r.-. ^:a follrwini it --,r, are ti.olatAorz of (l zt•r 17 c`. the Muni ci,,1 Can of Zc;a City aa -1 arc h4xc'rf brcrxll?t to ?aur nttraation for correc+..icn: 1. Chapter MCI.11.A. Dad: o' Valid miltinle (?.rllirr rr_a:it. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES B a. ita =c -ars that thm-c c;..ell rem ; it; are beim o; rratti? r:itamt ri rslti?i^_ n L•1li-*s•; jrX it. 2. I 0..aptcr 17-7(f). --fectivc electrical s -ata^. j a. ih-timu of th3 t:ort`: arJ r^.:th -mets of t?r_ stn:ctare i u lt: in;, `alt i srt li-itei to, a c ar?s s'axr:; :-�r_-_r 0.:cilir., rrdt are torl.ally t:it1ic-ut 1 el Ctixlr.ity, rririr, so:: h 1 c o nt at Vic coil i r,• ;­ duc :,at^ -r hCater. C. Mat`s first a•:.' .;+^_ floc= ia:• tc: say rririsn. g I!. :sisninr1 cam -DI-te n••:--urd floc+r rcuth ^iia :;<s&m.vst rm . r. ;'ia�tin.7 ar:er,7late first Clacir n::_-tsr.,w^t �r+t. north sire :rural vpliaa: in raft wir in•;in t31c furnace s ro•-n. p. Scnonl floor rvnt2I I.aaJ,rcm o7.x_rplatr it tax:; on. i 3. Oiarkrr Tack c° ra7uirr_ olc_trical light sfitci. e a. :X?CC.T! r_lror S'?'.it11 nit'c first rct- cn!5t of tic tdt-xvxnn h?_.^n, no rwitdnwd BEST '-i^_'st• DOCUMENT h. S.aas tla r rYa l si:1c s i�r,•_st rrrr, lac1:s a ra:itd:_t: light. 1�V11ILAgI,�; I c. rc:--m-3 flc»r r^.=Us ni��, nort:lnn. t roc. lac':n a 1.:itc1:c0 light. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES B - r i�l". i.Caal'1 lit"LL[0, 317-i 22, 1n7C i . m4o 4. C. -:iter 17-:(C) Lwntc,:y mt r,nai:c3 i^. toilet ros.. a. 1;t4)Cnt (f:ittl) tlr ^- ,tr»l h::; m) lm.%Itcrf 5. Ma,- .r 17-7(r) hcn;>:.cy =tr.x:turer mt ;:rajerly P. pct rorci s:x:t`n.r-_t corm --r the ro,Lj'!:tion 'has ! ttlel nolo.; the cx+rch vont. 17-7(a) Fou-rlation rot mintai aC in a ,00l state of rgair- r.. LYac•e:? frnry ::tion 1-1Y U) i! r---isrxst corm. 7• O ip=Cr 17-7(i.) a-L-w-It.er Crui74 'C a t- 7t 1taL1tT_i7}^j In a t X1i &tLte o: rtr,vdr. a. i:ic�raa-tc tumw =it at the ccrt],;ast mr..er of t.: t xuture. b. '!issir; ton'r_rtor art! duo ns_x: n j BEST i DOCUMENT AVAILABLE MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 1.101NES 27., 197!' r•:a: � �lar�, 13. Cha -ter 17-:. (,) l lec?: of rs:uir«? iA. rao.-.l flour r1G cirle vast arin vii sett i fra-r3 is 3v_:,L on L-vth =fiat -3. h. Fi--t ficor, south :ii ?x, t.:a risting scral:s. C. First floor, cat sire, two ,nissin ; screeno. d. Four nirnLr.3 tore-rs r_nrta side first floor. 14. 7-r.(a)tmac, of privacy in t m•1 ct rrs. ClstYr 17-;.(!C) a. until 3ida, first floor, toilet ?z- as door. 15. Cm -ter 17-7(a) wineat;s net rr:intain d in a ani state of repair. South nor .rJ ail:aa as ro:en in scar local-.>n_v. I_ rust side of first flo.-rr the Stall s paire win:io;r is hrr9;cn. C. re -5t a -c nt win's is :)rck.rr•. (scJt)c sire). c, rx'cp-e _`lour myth rmst roma t_:o rr.,rt-h vin.1-s:r is brrd:e.•a. 16. C.va to 9.30.!'.2.(,3) Ire: of rv:uirti wrdrails. s.r..^oo :: floor, s�rr3a :rice, t`..e ha11 c?uart?rail is 24" high. rrxt?a side, the !-.±ll rnardrail is 2:" laigia. 3.7. G a-L^.s 9.30.11.L. 1a6: of ra uirr_^ is of tion zur heat ias3 unit^. a. 1Oti YfUriv.,ce rrrrl i,n Xarcrto larve m furreace isolation. h. Sou hTu n:= a nn^ .., a r� to hxrc no `_n, nca isolation. 1E. rSa:yrs g.30.11.??. FV -.Iia an ti mL rninmi+r9 in sanitary Munition. I� r.. Smtl, hallwmy 1r±fiman first ani scar' flrrsr is dirty. i^. ,te 17-10(tI lzc:: of rcco;:1ary ear ss. f =. '.aat'; s cmul fIoc.r ,i Alin; unit n:1 clrs to ,-at to h:r:a 11 etre r. 21). E,'^.a Ker 17-7(x) T final r-aint-Snc-1 in a 9ao1 sate of rol air. A. cv:atiha..:_r.L or fra-c is broten loose. 21. Manlr_r 17-7(a) Collin7s not ry-intai c-! in. a K?)6 rtaw.. of r� >air. firer. rc--,j c.n= of tP . 9.ar:Y'.!'r'. tha roiI LY, Alat:t^r is li. F*k=r.^. :l Mr, south side, hitt? en cnilin7 is CYSC✓.n•1. + 9 c. front (ane nt) Frnr.1h Ole crilir3� Brat is Feeling. th.: ^oat: first flour egc?lliYJ Im-dt the in e. F uth GlC3, ;first floor, t'tilC r+?.cai-1 Torsi f m. tae %P..nt loan rra&.aY3 ant )'rll7irv7 plaster. j BEST i DOCUMENT AVAILABLE MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 1.101NES u a A I i I + '�I l S. ,�.Tiat 22, 1975 Pa:,o rrahr 22. C7.a.;trs 17-5(n)(1) Jad. cf rr.,ar•; t-omti3:t_4h. a. lb --ti hethros+ wit?:.:lt .: wirriv:r has no vc:lt fan. b. ''cxlth W-c-innt 1>;tlrtr 1 wiLlmt a ha_ ilo vent fan. 23. Cla.tcr 17-4(c) J.l,.ato:y ryA- oo.ntainc�; in a toilet rrr... a. :;ath I sr at ct7ol his na lavatory to it. 24. Cna-1tcr 17-4.(11) rxrfcctive t h iAi7v1. r_. in tie E_+ath Nine-'mt, t:e se.car lirr_ :r.;st of th+, e_:cazr hums a pia? ^.issim Lrai the ^•a �. floor, fiJt7 sirL^, the bathroa.: tmb fa:r.:.t is lellAnn. C. cQS:ne"..t, mrtl side the 34tS:::e.n faucacts Ie -1I:. r. Pirst floor, r/.Y.1th siie, t-.^. kitd+m sin): C1ra:Lm; e. First `Icrar, scut1 sire, thn lavatc=v Birk fa rcet; in i.e hathrom are leaking. 25. Chapter 17-7(h)(1) InTic 1tvite of nlu:i)ilr.,?. a. 6eme..:ioor, so•.rth sillo lnt',ttb fill symt allcws 2., 1;.a7trs 17-5.(h)(5) Zad: of Brit controls. a. mre L 1» e, twsion on tlx :.etcr he, z T_ relief valve to with12 Lr_ f,- of t`;n floor int thom--Ci I:aaz-crk_nt :;+_ter lr:?ter. 27. C+apvter 17-5(h)(3) Irrrr;,7ar vontim. frm ly''Itirvg unit. a. At t -he north bau—:lerlt location the >..+OSr1 stove vont is not seala•l. 28. MzTjter 9.30.17.11* Clam.: or storage inner stair,:avr a. 7+t the with first floor nr.it iLmlarrlcatl the n tairr, in the living roan. taerc is storauO. 29. ('nantrr 7.30.7.1:. 1:xtarior xo4 rrurfam: lwt pre,: r_ctra L5j p -,int or otY2 frotecti'✓C' c.,:ati7T. P. rirtions of t:rt m%tl rior Nm -a rv-int or mo paint Moth Era N rely rritlfirA t.vnt the list[d pro -4: y will be plBIC: 1Z 3 rs unfit for yu-an oIdtati.orl r.i:N'ty (i.7) after%'1�1'1^C of thiE rsatio-.� mleas tlx violation_ cite,: atm✓, arc corrr-&jA h,+forr_ thet ti,. -v.. 'Mir action trill !.c tE';Cn 171 the j'nusL^:7 Zns,'�tion Offft - 4i1':Cr t}`/i a::tlrrri_ation e` Crantcr 17-11 of the runicipa1 Code of Sa 1 47Aty. BEST DOCUMENT, AVAILABLE MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES hI01NES 4• '9'. L'.r_",ki i;rig*j,�� 3 C -i2 S. .io::.^.a�; t �.•� :: Trost 1-7, 177 ( ) 17.3-70 f i. -e I'C f11rt.?1ar a_virL%] of eii: 21Dta03, ter1:11ts On the um.1se3 ::ill :x P'O1T i {...itl CYacrs t0 :•uCdi.0 an prc-A19e3 'Yr Cn ^tr:•r 17-11.(c) of t,c ;?a i•:i0z1 C(Y;n. %rr-' )r�r on affecta) ty .MT ratios v4aic'.1 has 8ecn ir1,Uc l ir azn; motion L?itl: IJ :e C'lforix:X_•n: [)° an 31' -w -i :im of t`Ii.R Cl',a for rzrj r�:).nf,t•, d.?•: shall No nrantarl, a )=rkn a-1 the r..attrr before iho na-ssim T;}lcals rc=,; nrovi3a3 that such )'+ersOn OV111 file in t e Office of t*•e City Cher: a written petition ra;.x.sti,,3 -SLC 1 rr arL-g aryl settim forkil a Of t}'.e C,-- 1'. 1.33 thcINfOre ?:it in te, GO days after dntc the Mrtiw ves 1:crvav2. Ii f011 )1-;'h? a.,V G^,.*sLionG .•O11 ray cY};lt'Sc, t?•.c' 1:O'.-iir:� irs:*_rtion Cfffce Civic Center, 410 Z, -t ? ashi:r tcn (354-1V0, cdLnsions 345 cr 345). Sino -'rely, � Se.•licr i'oufn; Ins;.ector J David L4C- ! alo w ' I:(7u.7i1�, 2n.ry n?r:tOr ) i t 0 BEST . DOCUMF,NT AVMLABLU I r i i r MICROFILMED BY { JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES II0111ES i t . f. ORDER TO CORRECT OF PREMISES C]TYCONDITION CSF IOWA CITY CIV ,',: CKER 410 E. WASHINGTON ST. IOWA CITY IOWA 52240 (319) 354.180 DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND INSPECTION SERVICES July 26, 197E s� 11oTICr or VInLGTTm^ I Ron Johnson 7.19 F. Renton Iowa City, Towa 52.24n I PF: 3 F. garrison/514 S. Capitol j Dcar llr. Johnson: i The above Iisted property was inspected on Jn1y 19,1078, by Pamela S. Barnes, Rousing Inspector, Department of Housing and Inspection Services. She folloving ite-is are violations of Chanter 9.30 of the Punicipal Code of Iowa City and are hereby brnuvbt to.your attention for correction: i .. 1. 0.30.5.C.l.b. Lack of required screens. 174 J? a. Door at 3 E. Narrison, torn on south We. 440 - 2. 9.30.4.I.2.b. Lack of required banarail. — F Lac4.of handrail on.soutbweat exterior steps. , 3. 9.30.7.A. Steps not naintainLA in a,}zood state of repair. ✓a. Cement steps off of 5n4 S. Canitnl have deteriorated.— 4. 9.30.10.0. LncV.. of adequate fire protection. a. Lack of fire extinguishers at 3 r. Perri=on. 5. 9.30.10.P.. Lacl: of smoke detector. a. Leek of fire detector in each unit, Dr -m 0-267-1 6. ^.30.10.r... t+entinr units lacl•. fire protection. D � .a. Lack of heating Unit isolation for furnace and lint water 7s/)7 heater. 7. 0.30.10.T. Lack of two approved grans of egress. ✓a. I•ack of evress nn second floor. BEST DOCUMENT AVAILABLPR MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES IIOIIIES City ul i.r.e City DEPARTMENT OF MOUSING AND INSPECTION SER910ES C DNOLOGICAL RECORD OF ENFORCE NT DATE ACTIVITY AND REMARKS IJUMDcF INIiALS JUL 31153 r � Y. J�� �1 tui rt T, 1r�1 �I idtpJ' /va a6, L �7;,y CDsB i So � PSS••• 30 —27-7Q REJ1V L O�✓c Vi carr. RE c J 11V 7'0 AP7. �? 3 ,-3D-7 gr /v F �o�P • rAJ ec ANo Rw2 r Q i_ MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 1401tJES i w i i, i i' I`I I: I ron .Tol, 3 r: .nson,;rrison .7 -Iv 16, 1978 rare 7. R. 9.3n.7.I. Floor surfaces not raintained in a rensona?,ly innervIous con?ition. a. 3 r. 'Tarrison, tile nissinr in hitcher.. 9. 9.30.5.r.. Lack of aAegnnte ventilation. P6 p Y a. 504 A, bathroom lacks ventilation. in. 7.30.7.1. Floor enrfeces not maintained in a reasonably irpervinus condition. 504 A, bathroom the broken. 7/.29%7) b. 3 F. 3arrison, tile brnl:eR__JQatbronn. i 7 11. 9.30.7.A.3. Interior gall not raintained properly. a. 504 P, hallvay, broken plaster. h. 504 B, kitchen, hole in ceiling. i-: 12. 9.3n.E.F. Inuroper use of extension cords. A. 3 F. T'arrison, extension cord-rnnnirg from livinc roor to bedroom. 13, 0.30.7.F.2. Lack of required electrical outlet. `. 6rtfB.d71;f/77 —tea. 504 A., ?dtcben ceiling light not secured. l!, f id, y b. 504 B, hall light fixture faulty. C. 5.0.4 P., lltchen nisslnr coverplate on outlet. You will have ninety (90) days after receint of this notice to correct these deficiencies. At that tire a reinspection will he carried out to Insure code cornliance. Should yet, wish to content any of theee or,ers, your written pet tion requesting a Fenrinr before the llousing,, Anpeals Poard Host he received, in the Office of the City Clerl: within ten (1() drys of service of this notice. Your Petition for a nenrinr rn:st briefly state the grounds for your appeal. If you have any questions, please feel free to call Uousinr Inspection at 354-78n0, extension inn or 314. Sincerely, r Panels S. I+arnes Tlousinc: Inspector JT -0/19 BEST DOCUMENT AVAILABLE MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOI LIES Ir I 1 Ii J I j I 1 1 I I i I r IL 9 I @P I p 1 k 1 � CITY OF IOWA CITY �. CIVIC CENTER 410 E. WASHINGTON ST - IOWA CITY IOWA 52240 • (319) 354.180 AGENDA OF PROPERTIES Council Tour October 15, 1979 7� 1:30 - 624 N. Linn - Iva Hilleman - Manager T az o7- 2:00 - 915 E. Washington - Willie Wulf -Manager 3 - 2:30 - 331 5. Johnson - Robert Bender - Owner y- 2:50 - 320-322.S. Johnson - Donald Griffin - Owner ,f -3:00 - 3 E. Harrison - Ron Johnson - Owner MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOINES I 1 i1 I 1 1 I I i I I 3 7� 1:30 - 624 N. Linn - Iva Hilleman - Manager T az o7- 2:00 - 915 E. Washington - Willie Wulf -Manager 3 - 2:30 - 331 5. Johnson - Robert Bender - Owner y- 2:50 - 320-322.S. Johnson - Donald Griffin - Owner ,f -3:00 - 3 E. Harrison - Ron Johnson - Owner MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOINES M . kit it I it t rile,_ lar.) z rccn trll rc,_.a. F! fl-" j .ic*r a "i put J. xnr tr in no stynnoTCS? .1-311-it1q, cl-le mla of 1.4 witr rao C1 1. On Ad ra 1.�cvn�l cal el 1 r. to 'Xirst Fl,=: "N 'T t�jj:Let ro—.1 in, dlr, Mll lit,,'ati'vT 1.0 f_ln 17 lo DOCUMENT MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOMES L h-nFj e, skylichi-. no mtr.Ac, alarm no fica a=ca:.e. cvalv wcly '--:: a cj- is A: C. .fn*n F'.1;v is Ln re _-.—a L: baUvwv c3jy.! rrans tba.e I w. h-35, oavr kL—C, mxc. zead i.up o=.* }kla4lllG Sift MIX JM all. Et'. CICA ir.-Lil. is daliwaxrt in ax, ('rem 1-o)c lA-:7h sloi.9 f ST 'DOVJM' MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES a,. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES I (`car r-issirr" pzoblem, lrj rvallC for d RX'o'c-3 C'-', (IcKjo­ d'Oor'Ll at: at�.r 3,?Vj.. cloAlmj 110 llo .:A.Zat w Zl 'nya 1.)e-mr.-aL DOCUMENT AVAILABLE MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES I M I M h, ix, 5L-ro aa, '"n A­zl�wo 7kfar 1. Water t. F"113i 2�7 on,12 lv)i /BEST DOCUMENT AVAILABLE MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOVIES dr"., -m nv+l M h, ix, 5L-ro aa, '"n A­zl�wo 7kfar 1. Water t. F"113i 2�7 on,12 lv)i /BEST DOCUMENT AVAILABLE MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOVIES