HomeMy WebLinkAbout1979-10-16 Regular MeetingLOONCIL MEETING OF OCTOBER 16, 1979 F
Mg feh;yarr4Jr Mar lug mi Auerseair �oe 2 i 3 ' 4 T 6 Y 8 18 II r.
JORM MICROLAB
ROLL CALL
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF OCTOBER 16, 1979
7:30 P.M.
BALMER
dePROSSE
ERDAHL
NEUHAUSER
PERRET
ROBERTS
VEVERA
PRESENT
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOINES
ABSENT
I
I
I
f
I
i
I
I
L'
i
d
ROLL CALL
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF OCTOBER 16, 1979
7:30 P.M.
BALMER
dePROSSE
ERDAHL
NEUHAUSER
PERRET
ROBERTS
VEVERA
PRESENT
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOINES
ABSENT
COMPLETE DESCRIPTION OF COUNCIL ACTIVITIES
OCTOBER 16, 1979
Iowa City Council, reg. mtg., 10/16/79, 7:30 P.M. at the Civic
Center. Mayor Vevera presiding. Councilmembers present: Balmer,
deProsse, Erdahl, Neuhauser, Roberts, Vevera. Absent: Perret. Staff -
members present: Berlin, Melling, Hayek, Chiat, Stolfus, Karr. Council
minutes tape-recorded on Tapes 79-24, Side 2, 2230 -end & Tape 79-26,
Side 1, 175-260.
Mayor Vevera proclaimed October 20, 1979 as WSUI Day, and October 15, /936
1979 as White Cane Safety Day.
Moved by Balmer, seconded by Erdahl, that the following items and
recommendations in the Consent Calendar be received, or approved, and/or
adopted, as presented:
Approval of Official Actions, reg. Council mtg., 10/2/79,
subject to correction, as recommended by City Clerk.
x
Minutes of Boards and Commissions: 'Committee on Community 191
Needs-10/3/79;'Riverfront Comm. -10/3/79; 'Senior Center Comm.-
9/19/79 & 9/26/79;"Housing Appeals Bd.-9/27/79;'Airport Comm. -
9/20/79 & 9/27/79;`Parks & Rec. Comm. -9/12/79; Civil Service Comm.-
9/22/79;'Human Rights Comm.-9/4/79;'Bd. of Library Trustees -
9/29/79.
Permit Resolutions, Book 59, as recommended by the City Clerk.
RES. 79-493, p. 1288, APPROVING CLASS C LIQUOR AND RES. 79-494,
p. 1289, SUNDAY SALES FOR ASK CO. dba FELIX AND OSCAR'S, 5 South
Dubuque.
Correspondence: Letter from IDOT re I-80 lighting conversion, 9
noted. Letter from Airport Comm. Chrp. requesting appropriation of
additional funds for FY80, referred to City Mgr. for reply.
Applications for use of Streets and Public Grounds: University
of Iowa Homecoming Council request re street dance on October 19, _1251Z
1979, denied.
I
Affirmative roll call vote unanimous, 6/0, Perret absent.
Moved by deProsse, seconded by Erdahl, to schedule discussion re
r recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Comm. to adopt the Ralston
II Creek Watershed Management Plan for informal discussion. Motion carried
unanimously, 6/0, Perret absent.
Ernie Lehman presented concerns from the Downtown Association
regarding their advertising for the opening of the downtown ramp, and
read a resolution of the Board re concern over the negative response by /9
some Councilmembers to Zuchelli & Assoc. proposal for a major department
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOIRES
COunci'^.tivities
October 16, 1979
Page 2
store with the downtown hotel, and urging reconsideration of the initial
reaction to the proposal. Mayor Vevera advised that Council had requested
further information from the consultant, possibily available in two
weeks. Moved by Balmer, seconded by Erdahl, to accept the correspondence
from the Downtown Assn. Motion carried unanimously, 6/0. Katherine
Hull presented a resolution in behalf of the Univ. of Iowa Student
Senate calling for updating and enforcement of the snow removal ordinances. /951
City Mgr. Berlin stated that the staff is preparing input for Council on
an amendment, and the Student Senate would be contacted for Council's
informal discussion. John Suchomel, 330 N. Lucas, wished all candidates
19 51,
best of luck in the primary election. Robert Ogeson, 305 Woodridge
Ave., called attention to the proposed use of Woodridge as an access
road for construction vehicles and equipment for the N. Branch of Ralston
Creek Detention Dams, as recommended by Stanley Consultants, and requested
that Seventh Ave. be used instead. Berlin advised that staff would look
at alternatives.
Public hearing was held of the assessment of the costs of Weed/Grass 1915V
Control to the County Auditor. No one was present for discussion.
Moved by deProsse, seconded by Roberts, to adopt RES. 79-496, Bk. 59,
pp. 1291-1292, CERTIFYING DELINQUENT WEED CONTROL CHARGES TO THE COUNTY 9
5 7
AUDITOR. Affirmative roll call vote unanimous, 6/0, Perret absent.
Mayor Vevera announced two vacancies on the Board of Appeals for /?5s-/
three-year terms expiring 12/31/82, appointments to be made at the
11/27/79 meeting. Moved by Neuhauser, seconded by Roberts, to approve
the recommendation of the Iowa City Board of Education that Bill Kidwell
be appointed as the Board's representative on the Mayor's Youth Employment
Board. Motion carried unanimously, 6/0.
Mayor Vevera announced the birth of twin grand -daughters this
morning. City Mgr. Berlin called attention to the meeting with the
Electrical Board, which has been set for 7:30 Wednesday evening, to /96�
discuss recent issues regarding staff. He also advised that the staff
is contacting other communities re suggestions on Standard Metropolitan 1?4 /
Statistical Area (SMSA) procedures. City Atty. Hayek reported that
regarding the article in the Daily Iowan re access by Council candidates
to residence halls, that there is a policy voted on by the students to /9/,
not allow soliciting door-to-door in the dorms. The decision of the
Baculis Trailer Court matter was discussed. Hayek asked if it was
Council's wish that he investigate. Council did not direct him to do
SO.
Moved by Balmer, seconded by Roberts, to adopt RES. 79-497, Bk. 59,
pp. 1293-1296, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO SIGN AN EASEMENT RELEASE FOR AN
EXISTING SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT ACROSS LOT 4 EASTDALE MALL AND DIRECTING / 9ti 5
THE CITY CLERK TO RECORD A NEW SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT ACROSS LOT 4
EASTDALE MALL. Affirmative roll call vote unanimous, 6/0, Perret absent.
p. 1297seconded
, ACCEPTINGTHEREALIGutadopt R9B
NEDSANITARYSEWERONLOT 4EASTDALE MALL.
Affirmative roll call vote unanimous, 6/0, Perret absent.
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOIIIES
Council*�'tivities
r October ,u, 1979
Page 3
Mov
d by
PP. 1298e1299,BESTABLISHINGded JUSTYdeProsseCOMPENSATIONoFORDACQUISITION 0 REAL 59, /
PROPERTY FOR THE SOUTH BRANCH RALSTON CREEK STORMWATER DETENTION PROJECT.
Affirmative roll call vote unanimous, 6/0, Perret absent.
Moved by Balmer, seconded by Neuhauser, to adopt RES. 79-500,
Bk. 59, pp. 1300-1302, AUTHORIZING RENEWAL OF A CONTRACT FOR IN -BUS
ADVERTISING WITH ADS ADVERTISING. Affirmative roll call vote unanimous, Ufa
6/0, Perret absent.
Moved by Balmer, seconded by Neuhauser, to adjourn the meeting,
8:10 P.M. Motion carried unanimously, 6/0, Perret absent.
I
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK i
I
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
', CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES
a d
� A
1
i
I I"
COMPLETE DESCRIPTION OF COUNCIL ACTfVfTIES
OCTOBER 16, 1979
Iowa City Council, reg. mtg., 10/16/79, 7:30 P.M. at the Civic
Center. Mayor Vevera presiding. Councilmembers present: Balmer,
deProsse, Erdahl, Neuhauser, Roberts, Vevera. Absent: Perret. Staff -
members present: Berlin, Melling, Hayek, Chiat, Stolfus, Karr. Council
minutes tape-recorded on Tapes 79-24, Side 2, 2230 -end b Tape 79-26,
Side 1, 175-260.
Mayor Vevera proclaimed October 20, 1979 as WSUI Day, and October 15,
1979 as White Cane Safety Day.
Moved by Balmer, seconded by Erdahl, that the following items and
recommendations in the Consent Calendar be received, or approved, and/or
adopted, as presented:
Approval of Official Actions, reg. Council mtg., 10/2/79,
subject to correction, as recommended by City Clerk.
Minutes of Boards and Commissions: 'Committee on Community
Needs-10/3/79;4Riverfront Comm.-10/3/79;'Senior Center Comm. -
9/19/79 6 9/26/79;'Nousing Appeals Bd. -9/27/79•'Airport Comm. -
9/20/79 G 9/27/79; 'Parks S Rec. Comm. -9/12/79• Civil Service Come.-
9/22/79;'Human Rights Comm. -9/4/79; 'Bd. of Library Trustees -
9/29/79.
Permit Resolutions, Book 59, as recommended by the City Clerk.
RES. 79-493, p. 1288, APPROVING CLASS C LIQUOR AND RES. 79-494,
p. 1289, SUNDAY SALES FOR ASK CO. dba FELIX AND OSCAR'S, 5 South
Dubuque.
Correspondence: Letter from 1007 re 1-80 lighting conversion,
noted. Letter from Airport Comm. Chrp. requesting appropriation of
additional funds for FY80, referred to City Mgr. for reply.
Applications for use of Streets and Public Grounds: University
Of Iowa Homecoming Council request re street dance on October 19,
1979, denied.
Affirmative roll call vote unanimous, 6/0, Perret absent.
Moved by deProsse, seconded by Erdahl, to schedule discussion re
recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Comm. to adopt the Ralston
Creek Watershed Management Plan for informal discussion. Motion carried
unanimously, 6/0, Perret absent.
Ernie Lehman presented concerns from the Downtown Association
regarding their advertising for the opening of the downtown ramp, and
read a resolution of the Board re concern over the negative response by
some Councilmembers to Zuchelli 3 Assoc, proposal for a major department
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES NOIRES
y
h .t-
�.. Council Activities _.. .
Octobe 6, 1979 b=
Page 2
AVAII.ABL L
store with the downtown hotel, and urging reconsideration of the initial
reaction to the proposal. Mayor Vevera advised that Council had requested
further information from the
consultant, possibily available in two
weeks. Moved by Balmer, seconded by Erdahl, to
accept the correspondence
from the Downtown Assn. Motion carried unanimously, 6/0. Katherine
Mull presented a resolution in behalf of the Univ. of Iowa Student
Senate calling for updating and enforcement of the snow removal ordinances.
City Mgr. Berlin stated that the
staff is preparing input for Council on
an amendment, and the Student Senate would be contacted for Council's
informal discussion. John Suchomel, 3301,1 N. Lucas, wished all candidates
best of luck in
the primary election. Robert Ogeson, 305 Woodridge
Ave., called attention to the
proposed use of Woodridge as an access
road for construction vehicles and equipment for the N. Branch
of Ralston
Creek Detention Dams, as recommended by Stanley Consultants, and requested
that Seventh Ave.
be used instead. Berlin advised that staff would look
at alternatives.
Public hearing was held of the assessment of the costs of Weed/Grass
Control to the County Auditor. No
one was present for discussion.
Moved by deProsse, seconded by Roberts, to adopt RES. 79-496, Bk. 59,
pp. 1291-1292, CERTIFYING DELINQUENT WEED CONTROL CHARGES TO THE COUNTY
AUDITOR. Affirmative roll call vote unanimous, 6/O, Perrot absent.
Mayor Vevera announced two vacancies on the Board of Appeals for
three-year terms expiring 12/31/82,
J�
appointments to be made at the
11/27/79 meeting. Moved by Neuhauser, seconded by Roberts, to
approve
the recommendation of the Iowa City Board of Education that Bill Kidwell
be appointed as the Board's representative on the Mayor's Youth Employment
Board. Motion carried
unanimously, 6/O.
Mayor Vevera announced the birth of twin granddaughters this
morning. City Mgr. Berlin called attention to the meeting with the
Electrical Board, which has
been set for 7:30 Wednesday evening, to
discuss recent issues regarding staff. He also
advised that the staff
is contacting other communities re suggestions on Standard Metropolitan
Statistical Area (SMSA) procedures. City Atty. Hayek reported that
regarding the article in the Daily Iowan re access by Council candidates
to residence halls, that there is a policy voted on by the students to
not allow soliciting door-to-door in the dorms. The decision of the
Baculis Trailer Court
matter was discussed, Hayek asked if it was
Council's wish that fie investigate. Council did not direct him
I
so. to do
Moved by Balmer, seconded by Roberts, to adopt RES. 79-497, Bk. 59,
pp. 1293-1296, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO SIGN AN EASEMENT RELEASE FOR AN
EXISTING SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT ACROSS LOT 4 EASTDALE MALL AND DIRECTING
CITY
:THE CLERK TO RECORD A NEW SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT ACROSS LOT 4
EASTOALE MALL. Affirmative
roll call vote unanimous, 6/0, Perrot absent.
Moved by Roberts, seconded by Neuhauser, to adopt RES. 79-498, Bk. 59,
p. 1297, ACCEPTING THE REALIGNED SANITARY SEWER ON LOT 4 EASTDALE MALL.
f
Affirmative roll call vote unanimous, 6/0, Perrot absent.
1�
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
i
I
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 1401MES
I r.
�.. Council Activities
Octobe6 1979
Page 3
Moved by Balmer, seconded by deProsse, to adopt RES. 79-4911 Bk. 59,
pp. 1298-1299, ESTABLISHING JUST COMPENSATION FOR ACQUISITION OF REAL
PROPERTY FOR THE SOUTH BRANCH RALSTON CREEK STORMWATER DETENTION PROJECT.
Affirmative roll call vote unanimous, 6/0, Perrot absent.
Moved by Balmer, seconded by Neuhauser, to adopt RES. 79-500,
Bk. 59, pp. 1300-1302, AUTHORIZING RENEWAL OF A CONTRACT FOR IN -BUS
ADVERTISING WITH ADS ADVERTISING. Affirmative roll call vote unanimous,
6/0, Perrot absent.
Moved by Balmer, seconded by Neuhauser, to adjourn the meeting,
8:10 P.M. Motion carried unanimously, 6/0, Perrot absent.
Vn
ATTEST: I
L
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES I401NES
City of Iowa Cif
�- MEMORANDUM
DATE: October 12, 1979
TO: City Council
FROM: City Manager
RE: Material in Friday's Packet
Memorandum from the City Manager regarding housing code.
Memorandum from the Director of Housing and Inspection Services regard
rezoning of future public housing sites.
Memorandum from the Broadband Telecommunications Specialist regarding
cable update.
Memorandum from the City Attorney regarding proposed rental of office s
Memoranda from the Department of Public Works:
a. Discussion date for Block 64 Parking Garage
b. Bus route changes
Letter from the University of Kansas expressing compliments regarding t
downtown pedestrian mall.
Correspondence from the U.S. Department Of Commerce to the Regional Plai
Commission regarding SMSA status.
Correspondence from IDOT to the Regional Planning Commission regarding
SMSA status.
Memoranda from the Regional Planning Commission:
a. Suggestions concerning future planning programs, problems and n
b. Agency information - Update on remainder of budget hearing sche
Brochure regarding Community Technology Initiatives Program
Articles:
a. "Let's Get Rid of 'The Girl"'
b. "The Hawkeye Pride - Iowa City Transit System"
C• "Vying for Viewers" -
The Building Line, October 1979
Memo from Parks and Rec. Director re Cemetary wall.
Agenda of Properties and tour information for Council House Violation
tour.
Material distributed by Protective Assn. of Tenants re house violations.
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOINES
IOWA CITY CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA
RE(IJWR ODUNCIL MEETING OF OCTOBER 16, 1979
7:30 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CIVIC CENTER
410 EAST 4ASHINGION
ttICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES
■
i
i
i
i
I
I
i
I
i
i
i
j
f
J
i
.
i
i
j
i
i
I,
f
i
I
t
I
IOWA CITY CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA
RE(IJWR ODUNCIL MEETING OF OCTOBER 16, 1979
7:30 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CIVIC CENTER
410 EAST 4ASHINGION
ttICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES
■
AGENDA
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING
OCTOBER 16, 1979
Item No. 1 - MEETING TO ORDER. G(cy ✓��e
RDLL CALL. 6-4-4tCOSiwi
Item No. 2 - MAYOR'S PROCZAMATIONS.
a. WSUI Day, October 20, 1979.
b. White Cane Safety Day, October 15, 1979.
Item No. 3 - CONSIDER ADOPTION OF THE CONSENT CALENDAR AS PRESENTED OR AMENDED.
a. Approval of Official Actions of regular Council meeting of
October 2, 1979, subject to Correction, as recommended by the
City Clerk.
b. Minutes of Boards and Commissions.
(1) Committee on Community Needs meeting of October 3, 1979.
(2) Riverfront Cannission meeting of October 3, 1979.
(3) Senior Center Commission meeting of September 19, 1979.
(4) Senior Center Commission meeting of September 26, 1979.
(5) Housing Appeals Board meeting of September 27, 1979.
(6) Airport Commission meeting of September 20, 1979.
(7) Airport Commission meeting of September 27, 1979.
(9) Parks and Recreation Commission meeting of September 12,
1979.
(9) Civil Service Commission meeting of September 22, 1979.
(10) Human Rights Commission meeting of September 4, 1979.
(11) Board of Library Trustees meeting of September 27, 1979.
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MONIES
a
Agenda
Regular Council Mrr!tirxl
Septrmbnr 7.5, 1979 7:.30 P.M.
Page 2
C. Permit Resolutions, as recmrlended by City Clerk:
(1) Consider resolution approving Class C Liquor for Ask Co.,
7 dba Felix and Oscars, 5 S. Dubuque Street. (new)
(2) Consider resolution approving Class C Liquor Sunday Sales
Permit for Ask Co. dba Felix and Oscars, 5 S. Dubuque
Street. (new)
(3) Consider resolution approving a refund for Class C Liquor
License.
d. Correspondence.
(1) Letter from Iowa DOT regarding I-80 lighting conversion. No
reply is necessary.
(2) Letter from Chairman, Airport Cortmission, requesting ap-
propriation of additional funds for FY80. The City Manager
will reply after Council has discussed this matter.
e. Applications for the use of streets and public grounds.
(1) Application from University of Iowa Homecoming Council to
have a street dance on October 19, 1979. (denied)
R A I/� „ /7 . I - 6, r,
END OF CONSENT CALENDAR.
Item No. 4 - PLANNING AND ZONING MATTERS.
a. Consider a reconmrendation of the Planning and Zoning Cormission
to the City Council to adopt the Ralston Creek Watershed Manage-
ment Plan.
Camment: The Planning and Zoning Commission, at a regular
meeting held on October 4, 1979, recamrended by a 4-0 vote that
the Ralston Creek Watershed Management Plan was consistent with
the Comprehensive Plan and recavmended its adoption by the City
Council.
Action: a nrY n(Pn n r /' /iii O
y�11)
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES iI0111E5
Agenda
Regular Council Meeting
h September 25, 1979 7:30 P.M.
Page 3
Item No. 5 - PUBLIC DISCUSSION.
9
m
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOVIES
t
L u 1
Item No. 6 -
PUBLIC HEARING ON THE ASSESSMENT OF THE COSTS OF WEED/GRASS CONl'fdOL.
Comment:
This hearing is being held to receive comments concerning two areas
unmowel by Property owners which were mmoed by City contract. The
costs are now ready to be given to the County Auditor for collection
as regular taxes. A list of the properties involved is attached to
i
the agenda.
Action:
Item No. 7 -
CONSIDER A RESOLUTION CERTIFYING DELINQUENT WEED CONTROL CHARGES TO
G
COUNTY AUDITOR.
Cement:
After the public hearing, the City Council is requested to approve the
resolutions to certify charges to the County Auditor.
Action'
I
L�the
: IL rI Yi c [� ` cLP� n 1 n m (? i- "t
Item NO. 8 -
ANNOUNCEMENT OF VACANCIES.
a. Board of Appeals - two vacancies for three-year terns expiring
December 31, 1982. (This includes John Penick's term which will
expire December 31, 1979, and the term formerly held by Burton
Frantz which has been vacant over a year.) These appointments
will be made at the November 27, 1979 meeting of the City Council,
Iter No. 9 -
CITY COUNCIL APPOINTMENTS.
a. Consider approving recommendation of the Iowa City Board of
Education that Mr. Bill Kidwell be appointed as the Board's
on the Mayor's Youth Employment Board./�
Action:
�representative
/�
d!Al%GL l 2, 1- .P L.,� �.. — a....... 0.... I //:il!/__
m
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOVIES
' ..�tw— � CtiRrlLfiiwO p C�U�IIOGD F.�./•� N-�. �"-�L
Z[.`1i-�cC.t,. oCrrri,P �uxL L(ygQ, R- QGs...e.-,�c2,
ll //'
ljqw
�� `��-QGVIi� -�/-� • �^'/ ^fid='U�URQW1
i se sLVA L-
✓e�tLc`
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIOS•DF.S MOINES
a ,
bcj
-dr a4r V*_4
7,e-�
7-74K (:5Z�
V,14 r L�� 7+Ldtw
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 140114ES
Agenda
Regular Council Meeting
September 25, 1979 7:30 P.M.
Page 4
Item No. 10 - CITY COUNCIL INFORMATION.
item No. 11 -
REPORT ON ITEMS FROM THE CITY MANAGER AND CITY ATTORNEY.
a. City Manager.
a� A. O
CIA,C�CI
b. City Attorney.
-T.
Alf—[ Cts- z, Ja eti
hM A�� .A �'W.(iCLRJ W4 A.Q JLn.I-Yl ✓� �j
�p� Iw.LI.�� •
Item No. 12 -
CONSIDER RESOL[71'ION AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO SIGN AN EASEMENT RELEASE
�I
FDR AN EXISTING SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT ACROSS LOT 4 EASTDALE MALL AND
DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO RECORD A NEW SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT
ACROSS LOT 4 EASTDALE MALL.
Comment:
This easement revision is necessary to allow construction of a proposed
commercial building on Lot 4 Eastdale Mall. The relocated sanitary
sewer serves three/lots within Eastdale Mall subdivision.
Dthe
f Ze
Action:
49Zf2
I
r
I
PIICROFILMED BY
"
JORM MICROLAB
-
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 110IRES
f
0
,moo•-e.� --��- a / 17S _
c �
4L
�• 1 p,L�,,..L�T -_I��% , .eGt, IQGr.�(.e ✓�X�C /��-��'���", ,.-x.. �.M.i^a�
I
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES
■
a
. ------
Agenda
.L
Agenda
Regular Council Meeting
September 25, 1979 7:30 P.M.
Page 5
Iten No. 13 - CONSIDER RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE REALIGNED SANITARY SEWER ON LOT 4
j G(. EASTDALE MALL.
Comment: This sanitary sewer was installed by Knowling Brothers of Iowa City,
and was placed in the proposed easement on Lot 4 Eastdale Mall.
Action:
Item No. 14 - CONSIDER RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING JUST COMPENSATION FOR ACQUISITION OF
1q REAL PROPERTY FOR THE SOUTH BRANCH RALSTON CREEK STOR WATER DETENTION
PROJECT.
Camment: Pursuant to Council Resolution No. 79-99, adopted on March 6, 1979,
the Development Division has initiated land acquisition procedures for
the South Branch Ralston Creek Stormwater Detention Project. To date,
this has included obtaining appraisals and review appraisals on the
four project parcels and sending preliminary acquisition notices to
the property owners. Federal regulations require that the City, prior
to the actual initiation of negotiations with the property owners,
establish the amounts it believes to be the just compensation for the
real property interests to be acquired. This resolution accomplishes
this purpose and authorizes the City staff to commence negotiations
for the purpose of the necessary real property interests.
Action:
Item No. 15 - CONSIDER A RESOLUTION AUTIIORIZING RENEWAL OF A CONTRACT FOR IN -BUS
7 ()6 ADVERTISING WITH ADS ADVERTISING.
Comment: Having satisfactorily completed 3 months of a previous advertiser's
contract, this resolution will authorize renewal of a one year contract
with Ads Advertising, allowing the following additions:
(1) No political advertising will be accepted.
(2) The City may use any advertising spot not used by Ads Adver-
tising.
(3) Contracts with individual advertisers will not be terminated in
Q case iof� contract %termination with Ads Advertising.
Action:
Iten No. 16 - ADJOURNMENT.
EIICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES I40111ES
..
CITY OF IOWA CITY
CIVIC CENTER 410 E. WASHINGTON ST IOWA CITY IOWA 52240 (3191354.180
P R O C L A M A T I O N
WHEREAS, radio broadcasting is an essential service in creat-
ing public awareness to constantly changing situations
in the community, the state, the nation and the world,
and
WHEREAS, public radio station WSUI of the University of Iowa
has endeavored to provide all listeners with programs
designed to inform, educate and entertain, and
WHEREAS, WSUI has been a vital part of Iowa City and Eastern
Iowa for sixty years,
NOW, THEREFORE, I, Robert A. VeveAa, MayoA o6 the City o6 Iowa
City, phoctaim Satuaday, Oc,tobeA 20, 1979, as WSUI
DAY, and cat upon att peopte to note the AecoAd o6
achievement o6 Aadio 6tation WSUI, it6 peuonnet, and
.it6 anniveuany theme:
"CAy6tat Seta t0 SateZ.Uted:
Sixty YeaA6 o6 Fine Tuning"
Signed in Iowa City, low,
th.i.6 16th day o6 OatobeA 1979.
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 140111ES
1934
_ l
CITY OF
IOWA CITY
CIVIC CLNfLP ill(.) I WN;IIINI .II If\l .';I h WA ( IN h)WA (31A;i!A 18)( 0)
PRUCLAIfAT I O N
WHEREAS, Monday, October 15, is designated by State law as
White Cane Safety Day in Iowa, and
WHEREAS, the 1979 Code of Iowa provides that every blind citizen
has the right to carry the white cane which demonstrates
and symbolizes the ability to achieve a full and inde-
pendent life and the capacity to work productively in
competitive employment, and
WHEREAS, Iowa law also provides that every operator of a motor
vehicle who encounters a blind pedestrian is required
to exercise appropriate caution to avoid accident or
injury, and
WHEREAS, both State and Federal laws prohibit discrimination based
on blindness and support equal opportunity and affirmative
action programs to encourage employment of blind persons
in the competitive labor force,
NOW, THEREFORE, I, RobW A. VeveAa, Alayoa o6 the City o6 Iowa City,
do heAeby paocta,im Monday, OetobeA 15, 1979, a,6 WHITE CANE
SAFETY DAY in Iowa City and catt upon ouA citi.zen6 to
necogn,ize .the .indiv.iduat worth and ptoduetive tatenfi6 o6
ouh Uind neighbou and obseAve .the taw6 appUcabte .to
.theiA uee o6 ou4 6ttAeet6, t.idewatz6, htghmy6 and public
6acf.CGtie6.
S ,gned .in lona City, Iowa,
th46 15th day 06 OctobeA 1979.
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS•DES I4011jES
1937
_..
COUNCIL INFORMAL DISCUSSION
SEPTEMBER 24, 1979
INFORMAL COUNCIL DISCUSSION: September 24, 1979, 1:30 P.M. in the Council
Chambers at the Civic Center. Mayor Robert Vevera presiding.
COUNCILMEMBERS PRESENT: Balmer, Neuhauser, Perret, Vevera, Roberts, deProsse.
Absent: Erdahl.
STAFFMEMBERS PRESENT: Berlin, Stolfus. Others present for certain discussions
as noted.
TAPE-RECORDED: Reel #79-25, Side 1, 1720 -End, & Side 2, 1-900.
APPLICATIONS TO PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Boothroy present.
Courtcott Blvd. VII Legal papers need to be submitted, will
Ui"_;e ror next week.
Daves First Subdivision P&Z noted several contingencies. Council will
nee to make a recommendation to Coralville. Council discussed access
to the one lot. No dedication for future right-of-way has been given.
The City will not have any jurisdiction until the area is annexed.
Dale Sanderson was present representing Woods. P&Z will accept the
drainage o.f.storm water to the river. Council can approve subject
to specific contingencies.
AGENDA AND COUNCIL BUSINESS
1. Balmer noted that the minutes of the Human Relations Commission.
were worthless when submitted so late.
2. Balmer commented that the memo from the City Mgr. on Housing Code
Enforcement and the letter from Iva Hillman raise several good
points. Roberts noted the problem at 614 E. Jefferson re smoke
detector.
3. Berlin advised that the Item N16, Res. of Agreement with City &
Library was incorrect, and asked deferral of the item.
4. Berlin called attention to the memo from Plastino, asking for
deferral: of the award of bid for a week on the Block 64 Parking
Facility.
5. City Manager Berlin called attention to the request from the
Housing Appeals Board for an interpretation. He noted that the
first sentence in the Code says that the Housing Appeals Board
interprets the Code. They could recommend a change in the
ordinance.- Bob Johnson, Mgr., Town & Campus Apts. appeared
re storm windows. It was suggested that the Resources Conser-
vation Comm. work with Tinklenberg's information & work with
the Appeals Board.
6. Mayor Vevera asked if there was any interest in becoming a sister
City to Cazon City, Phillipines. He had advised them that he did
not want to incur any expense that taxpayers would pay.
7. Vevera pointed out that a yield sign had been put up for traffic
at Lucas/Bloomington intersection, Sept. 14th. There have been
8 accidents there in 1979. A majority of Councilmembers thought
that a stop sign should be installed, with signs stopping traffic
on Lucas. Berlin advised that he would so notify the Traffic Engr..
8. Perret questioned when the questionnaires would be available for
comments on the bus system. The maps are out. Berlin will check.
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAP IDS- DES III) ImES
1720-1800
1800-2230
Informal
Council
Sept. 24,
1979
Page 2
9. deProsse requested that discussion of the Ralston Creek watershed
plan be scheduled for informal discussion soon.
of installation of fence at Melrose Ct.
10. Council discussed results
barrier for Wright. Balmer called attention to Plastino's memo
re motorcycles. No one favored allowing them access.
HOUSING - PUBLIC fi0U5[PIG SITES Seydel, Kucharzak
55t_ is Baring had been postponed, and called
2230-Enid
Ber in advised t epub
the distributed by Seydel. He advised that the
attention to memo
Council would not be making any decisions today. Seydel discussed
�id4702,
sites for public housing listed in the memo, privately owned
a
parcels and city owned sites, analyzed each site and made
William White Blvd. sites were discussed, with
recommendation.
Dr. Eckstein present. Berlin stated that it seemed to be the
further with these
consensus of the Council to not proceed any
The of selling city-owned sites to
three sites. possibility
adjoining property owners was discussed. Council agreed that
to adjacent
vacated Virginia St. should be appraised and sold
property owners, retaining an easement.
Mike Rittenmeyer appeared re Site D on vacated F. St. Council-
Staff to with appraisal.
members will view the site. proceed
This property was previously offered to adjacent property owners.
in
Resident of 436 Grant Court appeared regarding designation
He noted that
Ralston Creek plan. Berlin will check further.
to comply with the requirements in HUD
it would be impossible
letter. Appraisal will be obtained for possible sale. Seydel
advised that 5th Ave. North of F St. had not been vacated, and
There
there had been no input from the neighbors to his letter.
HUD.
were no objections to his submitting the site to
HOUSING REHAB UPDATE Kucharzak, Steinbach, Siders
item on the informal agenda,
470-810
It was pointed out that if there was an
Council wanted some written material available to them beforehand.
Kucharzak reviewed progress of the project, and discussed the
Community Needs. Because
recommendations from the Committee on
he like to consider only applications from
of limited funds, would
the elderly. The present status of the program and workload were
'312' explained.
outlined. The use of the Federal program was
St. Cooperative loan was discussed, also for
The multi-family Summit
the rental-occupied Iowa Ave. Apts. Requirement of HUD agreement
for rental regulatory agreements was noted. Neuhauser commented
the best, and economical,
that cities have found the 312 program
and do not want Fed. funding cut. Kucharzak requested
program,
that the Rehab Advisory Committee be reactivated. As Council has
not voted this committee out, they could start meeting again.
PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR BOAT RAMP Kraft, Milkman, Comm. Gilpin & Howard.
&
810-890
Riverfront Come. has discussed agreement with Airport Comm. will
is angled, site is across from
have it soon. Access to the river
the old red-brick hangar on Highway 218 South. Parking for 20 cars
& trailers, cost $30,000 for project. Liability would be assumed
is their Berlin stated. Consensus of
by the City, as it project,
the Council was to proceed.
APPOINTMENT TO RESOURCES CONSERVATION COMM.-COMMITTEE ON COMMUNITY NEEDS 890-900
Bar er,
nanimous ecision o appoin is ae Inger-RCC. Pecina,
Meeting adjourned 3:50 PM.
Bonney & Haldeman to CCN, unanimous.
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -US 1101m[S
INFORMAL COUNCIL DISCUSSION
OCTOBER 1, 1979
INFORMAL COUNCIL DISCUSSION: October 1, 1979, 1:30 P.M. in the Conference
Room at the Civic Center. Mayor Robert Vevera presiding.
COUNCILMEMBERS PRESENT: Balmer, Roberts, Erdahl, Vevera, Perret, Neuhauser,
deProsse. Absent: None.
STAFFMEMBERS PRESENT: Berlin, Stolfus, Helling. Others present for certain
discussions, as noted.
TAPE-RECORDED: Reel H79-25, Side 2, 900 -End.
APPLICATIONS TO PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Boothroy present 900-1560
Court Hill -Scott Blvd. Part VII Legal papers & plat have been
revise . greement for etention basin distributed to Council. Lot
106 is detention basin, assigned to Lot 107. Item 4.b will be two
resolutions, if Ord. approving PAD is adopted.
PAD -T 'n Cae, Parts 1 & 2 Instead of item 4.c on agenda, Council will
need to set a public hearing on October 23rd. Agenda as posted will
be reposted. Balmer expressed concern, agreed to by other Council -
members, as to how well Home Owner's Associations work. Boothroy
advised that, in this PAD there are no common open spaces, each building
will maintain an area. This PAD complies with the treeDlantina Dlan.
Southway Park ( N Area) Developer has asked for special consideration.
Lega op pr
note re capacity of sewer lift station & recommendation
from Legal & Engr. Dept. that it is o.k, to tap into sewer. City Mgr.
Berlin will check to make sure BDI approves this plan, & uses.
AGENDA AND'COUNCILTIME 1560-2090
1. e rosse ca a attention to re -opening of Woodfields. Attys.
Ryan & Scholten present recommending any litigation be discussed
in executive session. Stolfus noted that executive session could
be held after 10/2 regular meeting. Notice will be posted on the
bulletin board.
2. Stolfus requested addition of consideration of Class C Beer Permit
for Quik Trip on W. Benton, to the Consent Calendar.
3. Neuhauser requested that the matter concerning zoning on Beldon Ave.,
letter from City Atty. Hayek noted, letter from Sherinian noted.
City Mgr. will tell Sherinian that under the Ordinances, the avenue
of appeal is thru the Board of Adjustment. No Council objections.
4. Regarding Melrose Avenue Sewer Extension project, Ryan memo noted.
Property owners to be notified of informal discussion scheduled for
next Monday, to discuss sidewalk & other objections.
5. Balmer called attention to the memo re Spruce St. water drainage
problem. Residents will be invited to informal discussion Monday.
6. Neuhauser commented on use of criteria from Nat. Traffic Manual
for installation of signs. Berlin noted that they should be used,
but other factors may be used by Council & City Manager to make
a decision. Traffic signals at several sites will be discussed
at Council's goals session.
7. Collection of small rock at edges of streets that were chip -sealed
was discussed.
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CCDAR RAPIDS -DES w01nES
Page 2
Informal Council
October 1, 1979
8. Neuhasuer called attention to problem in North Dodge area
with barking dogs, and sewer connection assessment. Berlin will
check complaints. She also noted that the catch -basin at Highwood
& Lee Sts. needs to be cleaned, someone is stuffing newspaper in it.
9. Berlin questioned if any of the four Council incumbents were going to
attend the Council Candidates meeting on Oct. 3rd. None will attend.
10. Perret questioned why the cards to be distributed for comments on
bus service were not ready. Berlin explained that Mose wanted the
new system to be in operation for awhile. All complaints and
alternatives are being checked.
HUMAN SERVICES BUDGET FORMS 2090-2560
Johnson County Regional Planning Human Services Planner Pam Ramser
noted that no Council representatives had attended the last two funding
sessions with United Way. If a Council person who is scheduled has
problems in attending the session scheduled for, someone else should be
contacted to replace him/her. Ramser went thru the Budget Form, Funding Request
Summary Sheet (which will be sent to Council on a regular basis for all
the agencies). She also distributed Instruction Manual & Questionnaire for
Agencies. Berlin advised that scheduling could be improved so that each
agency would appear only when they are considering funding for a request.
Council on Aging is the only budget not submitted. Ramser was complimented
on the improvements made over last year's budget forms & requests.
SOUTH GILBERT ST. RELOCATION PROJECT STATUS REPORT 2560-2838
City Mgr. Berlin stated that a t o some progress has been made on
property acquistion, Staff is not ready to recommend proceeding with
the Res. Awarding the Contract to Metro Pavers, who have agreed to
sit,on their bid. Other concerns re Country Kitchen (Braverman/Meardon)
were noted. Council noted their appreciation of what Metro Pavers is
doing, and agreed that if there are too many problems, Council could
decide that they would not continue with the project. An item will be
added to the agenda, to defer consideration to Oct. 2nd. and will be
so posted on the bulletin board.
APPOINTMENTS TO THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT AND THE LIBRARY BOARD OF TRUSTEES 2838 -End
agreed to appoint Carolyn Cavitt to the Library Board.
EXECUTIVE SESSION 3:30 P.M. Conference Room
Moved y deProsse, seconded by Roberts to adjourn to executive session to
discuss the summary of negotiation procedures of the pre -settlement
conditions for the City of Iowa City for fiscal year 1981 (Fire Dept.).
Affirmative roll call vote unanimous, 7/0, all Councilmembers present.
Staff present: Berlin, Stolfus, Helling, Brown. Brown presented the
proposal for the Fire Dept., and discussed the city's counter proposal.
Moved by Roberts, seconded by deProsse to adjourn. Motion carried
unanimously, 7/0. Taped on Reel H15, Side 1, 700-1540. 4:30 P.M.
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MDnIES
COMPLETE DESCRIPTION OF COUNCIL ACTIVITIES
October 2, 1979
Iowa City Council, reg. mtg., 10/2/79, 7:30 P.M. at the Civic Center.
Mayor Vevera presiding. Councilmembers present: Balmer, deProsse,
Erdahl, Neuhauser, Perret, Roberts, Vevera. Absent: none. Staffinembers
present: Berlin, Helling, Hayek, Schmeiser, Siders, Kucharzak, Stolfus,
Karr. Council minutes tape recorded on Tape 79-24, Side 2, 1-685.
Mayor Vevera proclaimed October 1979 as American Heart Month; the
week of October 7-13 as Employ the Handicapped Week; October 1979 as
Salute Industry Month; and October 7, 1979 as Firefighter's Memorial
Sunday.
City Clerk Stolfus requested addition of Res. of approval for Class C
Beer Permit for Quik Trip, West Benton, to the Consent Calendar.
Moved by Perret, seconded by Erdahl, that the following items and
recommendations in the Consent Calendar be received, or approved, and/or
adopted, as amended:
Approval of Official Actions, reg. Council mtgs., 9/11/79 and
9/18/79, subject to correction, as recommended by the City Clerk.
Minutes of Boards and Commissions: Planning & Zoning Comm. -
9/20/79; Riverfront Comm. -9/19/79; Design Review Comm. -9/19/79;
Library Bd. of Trustees -9/11/79; Broadband Telecommunications -
9/18/79.
Permit Resolutions, Book 59, as recommended by City Clerk: RES.
79-465, p. 1239, APPROVING CLASS B BEER PERMIT FOR
T. I. INVESTMENTS, INC. dba GODFATHER'S PIZZA, 531 Highway 1 West.
RES. 79-466, p. 1240, APPROVING CLASS C BEER PERMIT FOR DALE E. WATT
dba WATT'S FOOD MARKET, 1603 Muscatine Avenue. RES. 79-467,
p. 1241, REFUND A PORTION OF CLASS C LIQUOR LICENSE FEE FOR KENNETH
O'DONNELL dba LAMPLIGHTER II, 1310 Highland Ct. RES. 79-468,
p. 1242, APPROVING CLASS C LIQUOR LICENSE FOR BAUM & RICE dba CLUB
CAR 'LOUNGE, 122 Wright St. RES. 79-469, p. 1242, APPROVING
CIGARETTE PERMITS. RES. 79-470, p. 1244, APPROVING CLASS C BEER
PERMIT FOR QUIK TRIP CORPORATION dba QUIK TRIP #503, 123 West Benton
St.
Setting Public Hearings: Public hearing was set for 10/16/79 on
the assessment of the costs of weed/grass control. RES. 79-471,
Bk. 59, p. 1245, SETTING PUBLIC HEARING ON 10/9/79 FOR NEIGHBORHOOD
SITE IMPROVEMENTS - SIDEWALK REPAIR PROGRAM.
Correspondence: Letter from Clara Harrison re access problem
to Blackstone Beauty Salon, referred to City Manager for reply.
le;r-. .. . . --- I
II1CROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES IIOIIIES
Cc ^ it Activities
Octuber 2, 1979
Page 2
Mayor Vevera repeated the public hearings as set. Affirmative roll call
vote unanimous, 7/0, all Councilmembers present.
Moved by Balmer, seconded by Neuhauser, that ORDINANCE 79-2974,
Bk. 15, pp. 133-134, APPROVING THE FINAL PAD PLAN OF COURT HILL -SCOTT
BOULEVARD, PART VII. be passed and adopted. Affirmative roll call vote
unanimous, 7/0, all Councilmembers present.
Moved by Balmer, seconded by Neuhauser, to adopt RES. 79-472,
Bk. 59, pp. 1246-1247, APPROVING FINAL LARGE SCALE RESIDENTIAL
DEVELOPMENT FOR COURT HILL -SCOTT BOULEVARD, PART VII. Affirmative roll
call vote unanimous, 7/0, all Councilmembers present. Moved by Balmer,
seconded by Neuhauser to adopt RES. 79-473, Bk. 59, pp. 1248-1249,
APPROVING THE FINAL PLAT AND SUBDIVISION FOR COURT HILL -SCOTT BOULEVARD,
PART VII. Affirmative roll call vote unanimous, 7/0, all Councilmembers
present.
As posted to the agenda, item 4(c) was changed to the following
procedure. Moved by Neuhauser, seconded by Perret, to set a public
hearing for 10/23/79 on consideration of ordinance amending final Planned
Area Development plan of Ty'n Cae, Parts 1 & 2. Motion carried
" unanimously, 7/0, all Councilmembers present.
Moved by Balmer, seconded by Perret, to adopt RES. 79-474, Bk. 59,
pp..1250-1251, APPROVING THE AMENDED LARGE SCALE NON-RESIDENTIAL
DEVELOPMENT PLAN OF SOUTHWAY PARK. Affirmative roll call vote unanimous,
7/0,.a11-Councilmembers present. Letter of approval from B.D.I. has been
received.
Moved by Perret, seconded by Neuhauser, that the ORDINANCE AMENDING
THE CODE OF ORDINANCES BY ESTABLISHING SECTION 8.10.35.11.B.7, Sign
Regulations, be considered and given second vote for passage. Motion to
consider carried, 7/0. Affirmative roll call vote on second vote for
passage unanimous, 7/0, all Councilmembers present.
Donn Stanley, 511 S. Johnson, appeared requesting Council action
regarding voter registration. Moved by Erdahl, seconded by Vevera, to
urge citizens 18 years and older to register and to vote in the upcoming
elections.. Motion carried unanimously, 7/0. Johnson Suchomel, 330' N.
Lucas, agreed with action taken.
Mayor Vevera advised that the appointment to the Board of Appeals to
fill an unexpired term ending 12/31/80, and the appointment to the Board
of Adjustment to fill an unexpired term ending 1/1/84 would be
readvertised. Moved by deProsse, seconded by Perret, to appoint Carolyn
Cavitt, 215 Teeters Court, to the Library Board of Trustees to fill an
unexpired term ending 7/1/81. Motion carried unanimously, 7/0. Mayor
Vevera commented that the Council wished that some of the many fine
applicants who applied for the Library Board would apply for other boards
and commissions.
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS•DES IIOINES
J
Icil Activities
OL,ober 2, 1979
Page 3
City Mgr. Berlin stated that discussion of a left -turn signal for
northbound traffic at Park Road Bridge would be scheduled later. City
Atty. Hayek commented that regarding the Beldon Ave. housing issue,
Kucharzak wants to review the problem, and Staff will report back to
Council. The interested persons will be so notified. Roberts reported
that last summer Council made the right decision in not doing the
Ventura/Tanglewood paving project, as improvements have been made and the
street & area look good. Neuhauser called attention to a complaint that a
patch of asphalt was made on a brick street at Church/Dubuque. Berlin
will investigate.
Regarding recent action taken by the Airport Commission, a motion was
made by Neuhauser, seconded by Perret, and after discussion, amended to
read as follows: Moved that the City Council urge the Airport Commission
not to have the airport planning consultant recommend and evaluate
alternative sites for an airport. After further discussion, Perret called
for the question. Motion adopted 6/1: Roberts voting no. Balmer
requested a report from Public Works comparing chip -seal process with
asphalt process with regard to cost and life of repair.
City Mgr. Berlin advised that after his meeting with Kucharzak and
Steinbach, a tour will be scheduled for Council to view specific problems
regarding housing code enforcement. He announced that the Environmental
Protection Agency had approved the River Corridor Sewer Project contract
today. The contractor is deciding which areas can be worked on yet this
fall. Madison St. will probably be unuseable for a year. The Resolution
awarding the Bid for the South Gilbert Street Project had been deferred to
the 10/2 meeting, and the City Manager advised that the Resolution should
be deferred for another three weeks. Moved by Roberts, seconded by Balmer
to defer the Resolution for three weeks (Oct. 23). Motion carried
unanimously, 7/0.
Mayor Vevera questioned the legality of holding an executive session
after the formal meeting, for discussion of pending
litigation/Woodfields. Atty. Hayek stated that there is both pending and
threatened litigation, and discussion of strategy would be a detriment to
the City's interest, and that is a legitimate reason to hold an executive
session.
Moved by Perret, seconded by Neuhauser, to adopt RES. 79-475,
Bk. 59, pp. 1252-1257, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO SIGN AND THE CITY CLERK TO
ATTEST AN AGREEMENT WITH JOHNSON COUNTY AND A BETTER CAB COMPANY TO
PROVIDE SUBSIDIZED CAB SERVICE for elderly and handicapped. Affirmative
roll call vote unanimous, 7/0, all Councilmembers present.
Moved by Neuhauser, seconded by Perret, to adopt RES. 79-476,
Bk. 59, p. 1258, APPROVING AMENDMENTS TO THE FY80 BUDGET. Affirmative
roll call vote unanimous, 7/0, all Councilmembers present.
Moved by Balmer, seconded by Neuhauser, to adopt RES. 79-477,
Bk. 59, p. 1259, AWARDING ALLEY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, BLOCK 28 AND 29,
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS•D[s I10111CS
CI^:il Activities
Octuber 2, 1979
Page 4
O.T., 1979, to Metro Pavers of Iowa City in amount of $23,808.41.
Affirmative roil call vote unaimous, 7/0, all Councilmembers present.
Moved by Perret, seconded by Erdahl, to adopt RES. 79-478, Bk. 59,
p. 1260, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR CURB RAMP PROGRAM, 1979, to Streb
Construction in the amount of $48,423.60. Affirmative roll call vote
unanimous, 7/0, all Councilmembers present.
Moved by Balmer, seconded by Neuhauser, to adopt RES. 79-479,
Bk. 59, p. 1261, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR NEIGHBORHOOD SITE
IMPROVEMENTS - ASPHALT OVERLAY PROGRAM, to L. L. Pelling Company in the
amount of $28,738.95. Affirmative roll call vote unanimous, 7/0, all
Councilmembers present.
Moved by Roberts, seconded by Balmer, to adopt RES. 79-480, Bk. 59,
p. 1262, AMENDING THE CLASSIFICATION PLAN FOR CLASSIFIED PERSONNEL BY
RECLASSIFYING A POSITION IN THE POLICE DEPARTMENT (FORT). deProsse
advised that she would abstain as it should be an administrative matter.
Council discussed Charter provisions and past procedure for
reclassifications. Moved by deProsse, seconded by Erdahl that the
Resolution be tabled. Motion not adopted, 3/4, Neuhauser, Roberts, Balmer
& Vevera voting 'no'. Roll call vote on motion to adopt RES. 79-480, 4/2,
Ayes:: Roberts, :Vevera, Balmer, Neuhauser, Mays: Erdahl, Perret.
Abstain: deProsse. Neuhauser questioned if permanent reclassifications
could revert to temporary. City Mgr. Berlin will report back.
Moved by Perret, seconded by deProsse, to adopt RES. 79-481, Bk. 59,
pp. 1263-1264, AUTHORIZING JOINT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE IOWA CITY LIBRARY
BOARD OF TRUSTEES AND THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF IOWA CITY TO COORDINATE
NEGOTIATING PROCEDURES FOR PURPOSES 'OF COLLECTIVE BARGAINING.
Affirmative roll call vote unanimous, 7/0, all Councilmembers present.
Moved by Balmer, seconded by Neuhauser, to adjourn to executive
session for the purpose of discussion of strategy in matters presently in
litigation, specifically the City's pending lawsuit against Woodfields,
or where litigations is imminent, which would include damage claim already
filed against the City by Woodfields, where its disclosure would
disadvantage or would be likely to prejudice the position of the
governmental body in that litigation. Affirmative roll call vote
unanimous, 7/0, all Councilmembers present. City Atty. Hayek stated that
his opinion was that executive session for those purposes may be held.
Meeting adjourned, 8:40 P.M.
ATTEST:
MAYOR
CITY CLERK
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDs•DCs !m uiEs
MINUTES OF OFFICIAL ACTIONS OF COUNCIL - 10/2/79
The cost of publishing the following Proceed-
ings & claims is $ Cumulative cost for
this calendar year for said publication is
Iowa City Council, reg, mtg., 10/2/79
7:30 P.M. at the Civic Center. Mayor Vevera
presiding. Councilmembers present: Balmer,
deProsse, Erdahl, Neuhauser, Perret, Roberts,
Vevera. Absent: none.
Mayor Vevera proclaimed October 1979 as
American Heart Month; the week of October 7-13 as
Employ the Handicapped Week; October 1979 as Salute
Industry Month; and October 7 1979 as
Firefighter's Memorial Sunday.
City Clerk Stolfus requested addition of Res.
of approval.for Class C Beer Permit for Quik Trip,
West Benton, to the Consent Calendar.
Moved by Perret, seconded by Erdahl, that the
following items and recommendations in the Consent
Calendar be received, or approved, and/or adopted,
as amended:
oval Of
al Actions.
Council Pmtgs., 9/11/79 and �9/18/79, subject to
correction, as recommended by the City Clerk.
Minutes of Boards and Commissions:
Planning & Zoning Comm.-9/20/79; Riverfront
Comm.-9/19/79; Design Review Comm.-9/19/79;
Library Bd. of Trustees-9/11/79; Broadband
Telecommunications-9/18/79.
Permit Resolutions, Book 59, as
recommended by City Clerk: RES. 79-465,
P. 1239, APPROVING CLASS B BEER PERMIT FOR T.
I.,:INVESTMENTS$ INC. dba:. GODFATHER'S PIZZA,
531 Highway l West. RES. 79-466, p. 1240,
APPROVING CLASS C BEER PERMIT FOR WATT'S FOOD
MARKET, 1603 Muscatine Avenue. RES. 79-467,
P. 1241, REFUND A PORTION OF CLASS C LIQUOR
LICENSE FEE FOR KENNETH O'DONNELL dba
LAMPLIGHTER II, 1310 Highland Ct. RES. 79-
468, p. 1242, APPROVING CLASS C LIQUOR LICENSE
FOR BAUM & RICE dba CLUB CAR LOUNGE, 122
Wright St. RES. 79-469, P. 1242, APPROVING
CIGARETTE 79-470 APPROVING CLASSICS BEERES. PERMIT FORS QUIK (TRIP
#503, 123 West Benton St.
Setting Public Hearings: Public hearing
was set for 10/16/79 on the assessment of the
costs of weed/grass control. RES. 79-471,
Bk. 59, P. 1245, SETTING PUBLIC HEARING ON
10/9/79 FOR NEIGHBORHOOD SITE
IMPROVEMENTS - SIDEWALK REPAIR PROGRAM.
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 'IOIIIES
Council Activities Correspondence: Letter from Clara
October 2, 1979 Harrison re access problem to Blackstone
Page 2 Beauty Salon, referred to City Manager for
reply.
Mayor Vevera repeated the public hearings as
set. Affirmative roll call vote unanimous, 7/0,
all Councilmembers present.
Moved by Balmer, seconded by Neuhauser, that
ORDINANCE 79-2974, Bk. 15, pp. 133-134, APPROVING
THE FINAL PAD PLAN OF COURT HILL_ SCOTT BOULEVARD,
PART VII. be passed and adopted. Affirmative roll
call vote unanimous, 7/0, all Councilmembers
present.
Moved by Balmer, seconded by Neuhauser, to
adopt RES. 79-472, Bk. 59, pp. 1246-1247,
APPROVING FINAL LARGE SCALE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
FOR COURT HILL -SCOTT BOULEVARD, PART VII.
Affirmative roll call vote unanimous, 7/0, all
Councilmembers present. Moved by Balmer, seconded
by Neuhauser to adopt RES. 79-473, Bk. 59,
pp. 1248-1249, APPROVING THE FINAL PLAT AND
SUBDIVISION FOR COURT HILL -SCOTT BOULEVARD, PART
VII. Affirmative roll call vote unanimous, 7/0,
all Councilmembers present.
As posted to the agenda, item 4(c) was changed
to the following procedure. Moved by Neuhauser,
seconded by Perret, to set a public hearing for
10/23/79 on consideration of ordinance amending
final Planned Area Development plan of Ty'n Cae,
Parts 1 & 2. Motion carried unanimously, 7/0, all
Councilmembers present.
Moved by Balmer, seconded by Perret, to adapt
RES. 79-474, Bk. 59, pp. 1250-1251, APPROVING THE
AMENDED LARGE SCALE NON-RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
PLAN OF SOUTHWAY PARK. Affirmative roll call vote
unanimous, 7/0, all Councilmembers present.
Moved by Perret, seconded by Neuhauser, that
the ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CODE OF ORDINANCES BY
ESTABLISHING SECTION 8.10.35.11.8.7, Sign
Regulations, be considered and given second vote
for passage. Motion to consider carried, 7/0.
Affirmative roll call vote on second vote for
passage unanimous, 7/0, all Councilmembers present.
Donn Stanley, 511 S.' Johnson, appeared
requesting Council action regarding voter
registration. Moved by Erdahl, seconded by Vevera,
to urge citizens 18 years and older to register and
to vote in the upcoming elections. Motion carried
unanimously, 7/0. Johnson Suchomel, 330k N. Lucas,
agreed with action taken.
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
C,EOAR RAPIOS•OES 'dOIBES
Council Activities Mayor Vevera advised that the appointment to
October 2, 1979 the Board of Appeals
Page 3 ending 12/31/80to fill an unexpired term
, and the appointment to the Board
of Adjustment to fill an unexpired term ending
1/1/84 would be readvertised. Moved by deProsse,
seconded by Perret, to appoint Carolyn Cavitt,
215 Teeters Court, to the Library Board of Trustees
to fill an unexpired term ending 7/1/81. Motion
carried unanimously, 7/0.
Regarding recent action taken by the Airport
Commission, a motion was made by Neuhauser,
seconded by Perret, and after discussion, amended
to read as follows: Moved thatthe City Council
urge the Airport Commission not to have the airport
Planning consultant recommend and evaluate
alternative sites for an airport. Motion adopted
6/1: Roberts voting no.
City Mgr. Berlin announced that the
Environmental Protection Agency had approved the
River Corridor Sewer Project contract today. The
Resolution awarding the Bid for the South Gilbert
Street Project had been deferred to the 10/2
meeting, and the City Manager advised that the
Resolution should be deferred for another three
weeks. Moved by. Roberts, seconded by Balmer to
defer the Resolution for three weeks (Oct. 23).
Motion carried unanimously, 7/0.
Moved by Perret, seconded by Neuhauser, to
adopt RES. 79-475,' Bk. 59, PP. 1252-1257,
AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO SIGN AND THE CITY CLERK TO
ATTEST- AN AGREEMENT— WITH JOHNSON COUNTY AND A
BETTER CAB COMPANY TO PROVIDE SUBSIDIZED CAB
SERVICE for elderly and handicapped. Affirmative
roll call vote unanimous, 7/0, all Councilmembers
present.
Moved by Neuhauser, seconded by Perret, to
adopt RES. 79-476, Bk. 59, P. 1258, APPROVING
AMENDMENTS TO THE FY80 BUDGET. Affirmative roll
call vote unanimous, 7/0, all Councilmembers
Present.
Moved by Balmer, seconded by Neuhauser, to
adopt RES. 79-477, Bk. 59,,p, 1259, AWARDING ALLEY
IMPROVEMENT.:.PROJECT, BLOCK 28 AND 29, O.T., 1979,
to Metro Pavers of Iowa City in amount of
$23,808.41. Affirmative roll call vote unaimous,
7/0, all Councilmembers present.
Moved by Perret, seconded by Erdahl, to adopt
RES. 79-478, Bk. 59'
p, 1260, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR
CURB RAMP PROGRAM, 1979, to Streb Construction in
the amount of $48,423,60. Affirmative roll call
vote unanimous, 7/0, all Councilmembers present.
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDs•DE. n011JEs
Council Activities Moved by Balmer, seconded by Neuhauser, to
October 2, 1979 adopt RES. 79-479, Bk. 59, p. 1261, AWARDING
Page 4 CONTRACT FOR NEIGHBORHOOD SITE
IMPROVEMENTS - ASPHALT OVERLAY PROGRAM, to L. L.
Pelling Company in the amount of $28,738.95.
Affirmative roll call vote unanimous, 7/0, all
Councilmembers present.
Moved by Roberts, seconded by Balmer, to adopt
RES. 79-480, Bk. 59, p. 1262, AMENDING THE
CLASSIFICATION PLAN FOR CLASSIFIED PERSONNEL BY
RECLASSIFYING A POSITION IN THE POLICE DEPARTMENT
(FORT). Roll call vote on motion to adopt RES. 79-
480, 4/2, Ayes: Roberts, Vevera, Balmer,
Neuhauser, Nays: Erdahl, Perret. Abstain:
deProsse.
Moved by Perret, seconded by deProsse, to
adopt RES. 79-481, Bk. 59, pp. 1263-1264,
AUTHORIZING JOINT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE IOWA CITY
LIBRARY BOARD OF TRUSTEES AND THE COUNCIL OF THE
CITY. OF._ IOWA CITY TO COORDINATE NEGOTIATING
PROCEDURES FOR PURPOSES OF COLLECTIVE BARGAINING.
Affirmative roll call vote unanimous, 7/0, all
Councilmembers present.
Moved by Balmer, seconded by Neuhauser, to
adjourn to executive, session for the purpose of
discussion of strategy. in matters presently in
I litigation, specifically the City's pending lawsuit
against Woodfields, or where litigations is
imminent, which would include damage claim already
filed against the City by Woodfields, where its
disclosure would disadvantage or would be likely to
prejudice the position of the governmental body in
that litigation. Affirmative roll call vote
unanimous, 7/0, all Councilmembers present. City
Atty. Hayek stated that his opinion was that
executive session for those purposes may be held.
Meeting adjourned, 8:40 P.M.
A more complete description of Council
activities is on file in the office of the City
Clerk.
s/ROBERT A. VEVERA, MAYOR
s/pBBI ESjOLFU$, CITY CLE�RKpSuQbm�iptt/e/d, on 10/8/79.
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES uolrlEs
COUNCIL MEETING OF
ROUTING FOR ORDINANCES, RESOLUTIONS, AGREEMENTS, CONTRACTS, NOTICES.
ORIGINAL ORIGINAL XEROX XEROX
COPIES COPIES COPIES CONT. INSTRUCTION
,GENDA CERT. OF OF OF AFTER FOR
TEM N FILE N RECR. ITEMS CONTRACT ITEMS EXECUTION FINALIZATION
l e, 1- 3
7
'7
'— H97 1a4• /��Seef• keLV
s.F'e
Kecelde J" ✓ S�bd, Folder �
t7v, t
i
%�ecoa�er.(wke ✓fy/�i �ecuen dare �e 1 FIe i
�,.,,�.d-Su6d• A4pee-h
folclev -) r�ea.0, 4,
</`/.E44eef
L1 tis V ,\PJ. r1 QIP �
z u bci, Er%va p hers
to S 64. Foldev
`
14
j
'
I
;
I
PPD-cti,'0.} ✓
pO Fes. /1�/�jee-�,ky ✓��
ellevvia S.�oK�,rile
00-nl. 4dc.4d).. j
0-1evK'yCa,j, r I e l
le ;(/
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES
RE9uLaR. Coumcit MEEt*IM9
Y: 30 P. M.
?kccLsc Sl9N IN:
NamE: dd ess:
0*2
3,
Al
S.
13.
J4.
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOIRES
. t-
3�
MINUTES
cOMMiTTEE ON COMMUNITY NEEDS
OCTOBER 3, 1979 -- 12:00 NOON
It1i(:ItIiA'I'ION (:IiN'1'1i12 -- Mii1i'I'IN(; ROOM It
MEMBERS PRESENT: Swisher, Amidon, hall, Pocina, Bonney, Harker, Ilaldeman, Clark,
McCormick, .Johnson, Barfuss
MEMBERS ABSENT: Owens, Morton, Patrick
STAFF PRESENT: Milkman, Wilkinson, Ilencin, Sandro, Knight, Keller, Meisel
RECOM14ENDATIONS TO CITY COUNCIL:
Neighborhood Site Improvement Projects:
1. That the alley running north -south between the Burlington Street -Muscatine
Avenue intersection to the Court Street -Oakland Avenue intersection be made
one-way going south.
2. That the Traffic Department continue to research the feasibility of a pedestrian
cycle at the intersection of Highway G and Keokuk.
3. That neighborhood meetings be held in the North Side and hickory hill areas to
re-evaluate the sidewalk repair program in these areas.
SUMMARY OF DISCUSSION:
Chairperson Swisher called the meeting, to order and welcomed the new members of the
committee. Following introductions of everyone present, Swisher gave a brief
explanation of CCN activities.
A short discussion of the possibility of changing the meeting time and day followed.
Johnson moved, and Amidon seconded, that the meeting time and day remain the same
(12:00 noon on the first Wednesday of each month). Motion carried unanimously.
It was pointed out that this information should be printed on the application forms
for membership on the Committee.
Swisher called for consideration of the minutes of the September 5, 1979, meeting.
.Johnson moved, and McCormick seconded, that the minutes he approved as circulated.
Motion carried unanimously.
Update on Neighborhood Site Improvements Proiect and Curb Cut Proeram:
Bruce Knight, Planner/Program Analyst, presented updates on the Neighborhood Site
Improvements project and asked for specific recommendations from CCN on (1) the
Special Alley Project, (2) the pedestrian cycle at the intersection of Ilighway G
and Keokuk, and (3) the Sidewalk Repair Program.
Knight explained that the Special Alley Project concerns the north -south alley
which runs from the Burlington Street -Muscatine Avenue intersection to the Court
Street -Oakland Avenue intersection. Ile further explained that the staff recommenda-
tions would be to make this alley one-way leading south. The residents in the area
concur with this recommendation.
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOINES
/?if
Committee on Community Needs
October 3, 1979
Page 2
.Johnson moved, and Barker seconded, that the alley running north -south between the
Burlington Street -Muscatine Avenue intersection to the Court Street-Oakiand Avenue
intersection be made one-way going south. Motion carried unanimously.
Knight then explained the recommendation of the 'Traffic lingincer not to request
a Pedestrian cycle at the Intersection of Highway G and Keokuk. After some discussion
on this topic, Ilaldeman moved and McCormick seconded that the 'Traffic Department
continue to research the feasibility of a Pedestrian cycle at the intersection of
Ilighway G and Keokuk. Motion carried unanimously.
The 1'inni item discussed by Knight was the Sidewalk Repair Program in the North Side
I one Hickory Ili 11 wrens. Knight stated that the assessment programs requested by
the residents were not feasible and that staff recommended repairing as many of the
sidewalks as funds would permit in these areas. It was Pointed out that CCN had
recommended at their May 30 meeting that any money remaining from the budgeted
amounts on other projects in these areas be put into the Sidewalk Repair Program.
McCormick suggested that residents in these two neighborhoods should be given another
opportunity to decide what they wanted done in the neighborhood, because the original
meetings were held two years ago. After some discussion of this topic, McCormick
moved and Hall seconded that neighborhood meetings he held in the North Side and
Hickory Hill areas to re-evaluate the Sidewalk Repair Program in these areas.
Notion carried 10-I (Ilaldeman opposed).
Barker asked what, if anything, could be done about the seats in some of the bus stop
shelters. Silo said that she had heard some complaints that the scats were too low
and that the elderly had problems getting up. Knight said that he would check with
Hugh Mose, 'Transit Director, to see if anything could be done to remedy this situation.
Swisher suggested that the Committee read through the Neighborhood Site Improvements
Program Monthly Progress Report for September and ask any questions they might have
at the next meeting, 'I'll's suggestion met with nPProvai from those attending,
i
Small Cities Project:
i
Milkman explained that the City Council had gone along with CCN's recommendation
that residents of the Small Cities area be given the option of selling their property
if the property was not required for the improvements. Silo also called attention
to the neighborhood meeting that will be held Wednesday, October 17, at 7:30 p.m,
in the National Guard Armory,
Update on Senior Center Plans and Activities:
Bette Meisel, Senior Center Coordinator, presented the plans for the Senior Center
rind explained that these Plans called for a basement level, first floor level,
mezzanine, and second floor level. Included in the basement level will be office
Space for service providers, kitchenette, activity room, craft room and classroom.
The first floor will include the director's office, receptionist/secretary, dining
room, kitchen and a shop for selling crafts. The second floor will include space
that will be suitable for offices and an exercise room. The mezzanine will have a
library, work room, and conference room. She further explained that the building
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MONIES
Committee on Community Needs
October 3, 1979
Page 3
will have an elevator, all new stairways, and will he accessible to the h:ndicappod.
Milkman asked if it would he convenient for the Committee to meet on October 31,
which is the fifth Wednesday, rather than on November 7 since she will be out of
town on November 7. The Committee was very agreeable to this change.
McCormick requested a progress report on the Zoning Ordinance at the next meeting.
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned for a tour of the old
Post Office building so that members could sec how tine Senior Center plans would
be implemented.
i
i
Prepared bY<.___frZirr+
S,ndra Wilkinson, PPD Secretary
I
f
f !'
I
'f
i
i
i
I � _
MICROFILMED BY
i
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOIIIES
i
MINUTES
RIVERFRONT COMMISSION
OCTOBER 3, 1979 -- 7:30 P.M.
CITY MANAGER'S CONFERENCE ROOM
MEMBERS PRESENT: Gilpin, Knight, Fountain, Sokol, Vetter, Kroeze
MEMBERS ABSENT: Baker, BOUtclIC, Berry, Neuzil, Fahr
STAFF PRESENT: Milkman
SUMMARY OF DISCUSSION:
Chairman Gilpin called the meeting to order and called for approval of the minutes
for September 19, 1979. There being no corrections, the minutes were approved as
written.
Review of CIP Budget:
Milkman presented the revised Capital Improvement Program budget for the establishment
of a River Corridor Buffer and Trail system. It was moved by Sokol and seconded by
Krocze that the CIP budget be adopted and printed as proposed for inclusion in the
City's Capital Improvement Program. Unanimous.
Boat Ramp:
Milkman reported on the meeting of the Airport Commission on September 20, 1979, which
she attended with Gilpin, Knight and Sokol. The preliminary boat ramp designs were
presented at that meeting. After considerable discussion, the Airport Commission
approved the following motion 3-1:
That the Iowa City Municipal Airport Commission conditionally okays the
construction of the River Front Commission's proposed boat ramp on said
Sturgis Ferry Park land, conditions being;
' 1. That the Iowa City Municipal Airport Commission's attorney review
any ramifications of ownership on said land.
2. That the total area of ramp and parking area be within the approach
zone to runway 24.
3. That a proper lease be drawn between the Airport Commission and the
City of Iowa City outlining legal boundaries of said land.
Milkman stated that Howard Sokol and the City Legal staff drew up a Memorandum of
r ( Understanding (attached) between the City and the Airport Commission. A copy of the
memorandum was sent to Richard Phipps, Chairman of the Airport Commission; Mr. Phipps
has been asked to attend the informal Council meeting on Monday, October 8, if he
has any comments.
Milkman also reported that the preliminary boat ramp designs had been presented to
Council on September 24, and that the Council approved the plans and favored a speedy
conclusion of the project.
i
1939
PIICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES IIOIIIES
�
I
I
i
I
I
f
J
f
i
�
i
i
I
1
i
II
�j
i
i
i
Riverfront Commission
Ortobor 3, 1979
Page 2
Streambank Erosion Control:
Commission members reviewed a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers publication on erosion
control. Gilpin recommended that this booklet be adapted to Iowa Citys standards
when these standards are established by the River Corridor Overlay ordinance.
River Corridor Overlay Zone Ordinance:
There was some discussion on several items in the proposed ordinance as follows:
I. There is some confusion due to the use of the word "zone" both as a
area and as a "set of rules for the areall,
geographical
2. Vetter felt very strongly that single family dwellings should not be
exempt from filing a site plan (page 4). She recommended a SO' setback from
the river channel as a minimum requirement. totally
3. ' On page 12 under Permitted Uses, special exception for marinas was questioned
since this appears to be an appropriate use.
In order to expedite review of the ordinance, the Commission set a special meeting
for Wednesday, October 17, which will be devoted entirely to a discussion of th
ordinance with the assistance of Don Schmeiser, Senior Planner. e
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned.
Prepared by
Marianne Milkman, Planner/Program Analyst
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES
D
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
In accordance with a resolution passed September 19, 1979, the
Iowa City Municipal Airport Commission hereby consents to the installa-
tion of a boat ramp in Sturgis Ferry Park, due east of the present
curb cut along Highway 218 south of the east -west runway centerline.
In accordance with a resolution passed 1979, the
City Council of the City of Iowa City hereby consents to the installa-
tion of the above boat ramp in Sturgis Ferry Park.
It is hereby agreed that the execution of this agreement and the
construction of the boat ramp is not intended to relinquish or enhance
any claim of right with regard to any portion of Sturgis Ferry Park.
Dated:
Dated:
1979
Chairperson
1979
Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOVIES
Ercy- P'r & ..
By THE LEGAL
PROPOSED IOWA RIVER CORRIDOR BUFFER AND TRAIT. SYSTEM
k
Priorities For Acquisition and 'frail Completion
1. Rocky Shore Drive trail $100,000
2. All curb cuts 1,400
3. Riverside Drive: Iowa Avenue to Burlington
Trail construction 40,000
Guard Rail 10,000
4. Riverside Drive: Burlington Street to Sturgis Corner
Easements $ 45,000
Purchase 65,000
Trail (asphalt) 10,0110
Trail (concrete sidewalk) 45,000
Total T165,000
Note: This cost does not include land donations and trail construction agreed upon
by the owner of Sturgis Corner lots.
S. Passage under U.S. 6
> Trail $ 4,250
Guardrail 7,500
Cutting 6 Stabalization 15,0110
Total 26,500
6. Sturgis Ferry Park
Trail $ 25,000
7. Trail paralleling 218 on Frontage Road between Sturgis Ferry Park and Mesquakie Park
Signing and street stencils $ 250
i (Does not include street repairs)
8. Mesquakie Park Trail $ 20,000
i
Five Year Capital Improvement Program
FY 81 $147,000
Rocky Shore Drive (1)
Curb Cuts (2)
Riverside Drive Sidewalk Improvements (4)
!I PY 82 $ 65,000
Riverside Drive trail (Iowa to Burlington) (3)
Easements on Riverside Drive (4)
FY 83 $ 75,000
Land acquisition and trail on Riverside Drive (4)
PY 84 $ 52,0011
j Passage under U.S. 6 (5)
Sturgis Ferry Park trail (6)
j
1.�
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
r + CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES
I -
R f:
I
-2-
FY 85 $ 21,000
Paralleling 218 on Frontage Road (7)
Mesquakie Park trail (8)
Approved by the Riverfront Commission 10/3/79
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES
i
i
I
i
I
.1
I
I
I
�
II'
I
I
I
L
I
L
i
I
i
`.I
I
FY 85 $ 21,000
Paralleling 218 on Frontage Road (7)
Mesquakie Park trail (8)
Approved by the Riverfront Commission 10/3/79
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES
MINUTES
SENIOR CENTER COMMISSION
SEPTEMBER 19, 1979 - 7:30 P.M.
CITY MANAGER'S CONFERENCE ROOM
MEMBERS PRESENT: Bourgeois, Carlton, Sando, Scott, Summerwill,
Williams
MEMBERS ABSENT: Ambrisco
STAFF PRESENT: Berlin, Meisel
GUESTS: Jo. Co. Board of Supervisors: Janet Shipton;
Jo. Co. Council on Aging: Mildred Snider,
H. Lee Jacobs, Alvin Logan, Stella M. Cooper,
Maggie Penziner, Beulah
Cora Pollock, Lee Poynter, Mary Rock, Albertan
R. Brunton, Alice G. Fellows, Doris E. Bridgeman,
Mary C. MacGibbon.
SUMMARY OF DISCUSSION:
Chairperson Carlton brought the meeting to order. Summerwill moved to
adopt the minutes of August 22, 1979 as read. Williams seconded, action
approved unanimously.
to the attention
the Commission
account,lwhich astthe terminology used oin the Commission'sthat recommendation
to the City Council regarding the Senior Center Gift Fund, was incorrect.
Meisel explained that the Legal Department in reviewing the resolution had
changed the wording. The resolution now authorizes the Finance Department
to invest the funds in an appropriate manner.
JOHNSON COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING PRESENTATION:
Alvin Logan, member of the Johnson County Council on Aging Board, asked the
Commission to consider a proposal to make the Council a part of the City
services at the Senior Center. He said that presently they have a program
but no money with which to finance it. Berlin replied that community
f groups can provide some services better than the City. The City Council
has been quite definite on the subject of providing no direct services at
the Center, but rather providing the space for others to do so. Janet
Counnongo ng support for County
said aamount
forugencies presently n
housed
tythe Close Mansion
is unclear.
Doris Bridgeman, Executive Director of Johnson County Council on Aging,
1 showed slides of their program and spoke about the role the Council plays
in the elderly community. Berlin suggested that she repeat this
presentation at an informal meeting of the City Council.
i
E'
IIICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES
/9L110
.k
SENIOR CENTER COMMI:. .JN
SEPTEMBER 19, 1979
Page 2
PRESENTATION OF DESIGN DEVELOPMENT PHASE OF ARCHITECTURAL PLANS
Bill Nowysz and Walter Robolino explained the plans and the changes that
have been made since the Commission last reviewed them. The Commission
expressed no serious concerns as to these changes.
The architects expect to receive an independent estimate of construction
costs next week. In this way they will know if they are on target or if
cuts need to be made.
Berlin mentioned that a letter had been sent to Robert Welsh with carbon
copies to Don Sehr and Russ Proffitt reiterated the City's position that
the only money available for kitchen equipment was the $50,000 contributed
by the County. Attached was a list of the essential equipment recommended
by the architect and additional alternatives which could be chosen if the
equipment on the essential list comes in low.
OTHER BUSINESS:
Meisel passed out sample statements of purpose, philosophy,
objectives for Senior Center. She asked Sando to moderate the next meeting
at which these would be discussed. The Commission decided that they needed
a special work session in which to review these and draft their own. It was
agreed to meet on September 26 at 7:30 PM in the City Manager's Conference
Room.
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned.
Thea Sando, Secretary
FIICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES
.:
SENIOR CENTER COMMISSION
SEPTEMBER 26, 1979 - 7:30 P.M.
CITY MANAGER'S CONFERENCE ROOM
MEMBERS PRESENT: Carlton, Sando, Scott, Summerwill, Williams
MEMBERS ABSENT: Ambrisco, Bourgeois
STAFF PRESENT: Meisel
SUMMARY OF DISCUSSION:
A discussion was held in which the Commission exchanged information as to
the events which lead up to the present status of the Senior Center. It
was determined that the priority item of business was the formal
recommendation to Council of which agencies should be invited to locate at
the Senior Center. At this point there is an informal agreement between
certain agencies and the City, but nothing in writing. The Commission
advised Meisel to have available at their next meeting material concerning
the agencies and their requirements; guidelines and policies for use of
Center space by agencies; what exactly the City is offering these
agencies; what the City expects in return.
A draft of a survey prepared by the Gerontology Project was passed out.
This survey could provide the City, County and University with information
about the 7,000 county elderly. This information would be useful in
planning services, projects, activities and classes to meet the needs and
interests of the community. It was agreed that members would be prepared
to critique it at their next meeting.
The Commission decided that they would again attempt to begin their study
of Senior Center purpose, goals and objectives at the next regular
meeting.
There being no f rther business, the meeting was adjourned.
Thea S� cretary.
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOVIES
MINUTES
HOUSING APPEALS BOARD
September 27, 1979 -- 7:00 P.M.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Klaus, VanderZee, Smithey, Graf, Dennis.
STAFF PRESENT: Cook, Steinbach, Kuebler, Vezina.
OTHERS PRESENT: Michael Kennedy, David Poula, Ralph Neuzi1.
Chairperson Klaus asked for corrections or changes to the minutes of the
board meeting of September 13, 1979.
VanderZee moved, Dennis seconded, that VanderZee's motion located on
page 7 be revised to show that the intent of the motion was not to require
the City to cover the cost of the damages to Mr. Bright regarding the
installation of handrails. Steinbach stated that the tapes of the hearing
would be rechecked and the minutes would be corrected if they showed a
misquote. Motion carried unanimously.
Graf moved, Dennis seconded, that the minutes of the meeting of
September 13 be approved as amended. Acceptance was approved by unanimous
vote. Chairperson Klaus swore in those who would testify. NOTE: Willie
Wulf was not sworn in as he stated he would not testify.
BOARD TO HEAR THE CASE OF WILLIE WULF & MS. ROSE CAMPBELL -
Steinbach stated that the appeal had been properly filed and that the
appeal had been requested by both Willie Wulf and Rose Campbell. It was
noted for the record that this case was being heard for the first time;
however, it was being heard on a continuous basis since it was first
slated to be heard at the September 13 hearing. Steinbach then asked Mike
Kennedy if he was representing both Ms. Campbell and Mr. Wulf.
Mr. Kennedy replied that yes he was.
Kuebler stated that on June 21 he conducted an annual inspection with
manager Willie Wulf on the property located at 915 E. Washington. A
notice of violation was served to Mr. Wulf on July 13, and on July 16
Mr. Wulf came to the office of the Housing Division and at that time it
was agreed that the inspector would remeasure the ceilings of the third
floor apartment as per a request by Mr. Wulf. On July 17, Inspector
Kuebler did, in fact, remeasure the ceiling height of the third floor
apartment. Inspector Kuebler then read into the minutes the applicable
code section which states the required ceiling height in all habitable
rooms. Kuebler then entered three photographs of the third floor dwelling
unit for the record and they were marked exhibits 1, 2 and 3. Both
Mr. Wulf and Mr. Kennedy approved the photographs as accurate record.
Inspector Kuebler explained to the Board the layout of the third floor
apartment and presented evidence regarding the actual measurements of the
knee walls, the sloping walls and the peak ceiling.
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS•DES 1401NES
041
HOUSING APPEALS BOARD
September 27, 1979
Page 2
Kennedy asked whether "ceiling" was ever defined in the Iowa City Housing
Code. Kuebler responded that no, not to his knowledge. Kennedy then read
Webster's definition of "ceiling" to the Board members. Kennedy presented
his feelings to the Board regarding the language of the ceiling height
requirements and stated that a dwelling unit such as this should really
not be taken off the market. He stated that he would be willing to work
with members of the Board and staff in finding an alternate interpretation
of the Code in order that such a dwelling unit could remain on the market.
Klaus asked Cook if it would be appropriate to go to the dictionary for a
definition of the term "ceiling" if it was not already defined in the
Code.
Cook stated that most lawyers do go to the dictionary for definitions.
However, it should be noted that the interpretation should include a
common sense aspect also.
The question was brought up by the Board that, in a case such as this where
there are slanted areas, when does a wall become a ceiling?
Webster's dictionary defines a "ceiling" as being overhead.
Steinbach stated that the department's interpretation of the Code is such
that a ceiling is measured at that point in which the measurement between
the floor and the ceiling is at least seven feet. In single family
dwellings and duplexes, the square footage of a room may be figured from
that point at which that measurement is five feet. Kuebler read the
entire Code section into the minutes, and Steinbach stated that in
computing the average ceiling height there are two other factors which
enter into the requirements. First, that a computation of the square
footage of a habitable room is measured at those points in which the
ceiling height is seven feet or above, and secondly, that all habitable
rooms must have a width of at least seven feet. Steinbach then went to the
blackboard and drew a diagram of this third floor apartment and showed the
method by which both ceiling height and square footage of a habitable room
are computed.
Klaus asked Kennedy about the appeal regarding electrical outlets.
Kennedy responded that he had mainly investigated the appeal of ceiling
heights and that Mr. Wulf could supply more accurate information
regarding the electrical outlets.
Wulf stated that he had spoken to an electrician and that all electrical
changes could be made. However, they would all be surface mounted. He
stated that there was considerable expense in complying with the Code;
however, compliance could be made if an adequate amount of time was given,
i.e. about 60 days.
The question of required light switches was discussed which showed that
Steinbach and Kuebler had conducted an inspection to double check the
location of required light switches and that the violation had been
properly cited as per current departmental policy.
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS•DES Mo111ES
HOUSING APPEAL.. BOARD
September 27, 1979
Page 3
Wulf stated that all other corrections regarding the notice would be made
within the alloted amount of time given in the notice of violation.
Kennedy asked another question regarding the ceiling height violation -
what is a finished ceiling?
Steinbach replied that it would be a smooth area that the inspector could
stretch a measuring tape from the floor to measure the given ceiling
height.
Kennedy asked whether that was, in fact, an administrative
interpretation.
Steinbach replied that there were other code requirements referring to the
condition and general maintenance aspects of walls, floors and ceilings,
and the interpretation was derived from those types of requirements.
Kennedy asked that the Board give the statute a liberal interpretation and
that a more accurate definition of the term "ceiling" be sought for
clarification.
VanderZee stated that even if it were possible to compute the ceiling
height in a different manner, perhaps according to Webster, that the
apartment would still be in violation of the requirements of space or
square footage.
Kennedy replied that lack of room area was not listed on the notice of
violation. He then asked if it would be possible to compute the
dimensions of this dwelling unit in such a way as to show that the unit
would conform to the requirements of the Housing Code. Cook then asked
whether the computations could be conducted in a different fashion also.
Kuebler again gave the Board an explanation of the ceiling configuration
and stated that a more liberal interpretation of the Code regarding
required floor area would show that at the actual floor level a
computation of the square footage would show that the dwelling unit
conformed to the minimum requirements.
Steinbach stated that the requirements being discussed are requirements
which are also found in the State Code. He stated that the problem is
primarily being generated in those dwellings which were originally built
and used as single family dwellings and had, at a later date, been
converted in use to a multiple status. The basements and the attic areas
of these dwellings were not originally intended to be used as habitable
space. He stated that the method of calculating the requirements and/or
deficiencies was an accurate method. However, it was his personal feeling
that this unit was, in fact, a clean and safe unit. He stated that the
department, in enforcement of these requirements, is being forced to
vacate units which otherwise would be perfectly adequate living quarters.
Klaus asked Kennedy whether any investigation had been done to find out
whether the dwelling would conform to the requirements of the grandfather
clause regarding ceiling height.
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS•DES 1101HES
HOUSING APPEAL.. BOARD
September 27, 1979
Page 4
Kennedy replied that no investigation had been done at this time.
Cook submitted to the board a definition of ceiling found in the arch-
itectural and building trades dictionary. This was read into the minutes
by Kennedy.
VanderZee stated that although he was very sympathetic to the appellants,
he could not see any way in which the Board could not uphold the notice of
violation as written.
VanderZee moved, Dennis seconded, that the violations be upheld. Klaus
stated that for the Board to do anything other than uphold the State Code
they would be left open to liability.
Klaus stated that the Board, in the form of a Housing Commission, had made
recommendations to Council to alter these requirements. However, it was
noted in Council that the requirements could not, by law, be less
stringent than those found in the State Code. The Housing Board stated
that this problem should be put on the agenda of the Housing Commission to
make suggestions that the City Council contact the State Legislature in
exposing these problems and that suggestions be made to change the
requirements on the State level.
Steinbach stated that he had just completed an analysis of the State
Housing Code, State Building Code, and local housing code, which would be
submitted to City Council to show the inconsistencies between the codes
and said memorandum would eventually be forwarded to the State
Legislature.
The notice of violation was upheld by the Housing Board of Appeals on a
unanimous vote.
BOARD TO HEAR THE CASE OF MR. DOUGLAS EDMONDS -
728 E. COLLEGE
Steinbach stated that the appeal had been properly filed and that as was
the case with the prior hearing, this appeal was being heard for the first
time on a continuance basis.
Kuebler stated that he had conducted this request inspection on July 10 as
per the wishes of Mr. Jerry Zaiser. Mr. Zaiser came to the Housing
Division and picked up the notice of violation on July 19. Kuebler stated
that on July 27, an administrative review was conducted regarding this
case. Pursuant to that administrative review, two of the light switches
which had originally been required in the notice of violation were at that
time rescinded due to departmental policy. Kuebler read into the minutes
the applicable code sections requiring light switches. Kuebler stated
that the departmental policy regarding light switches was such that a
light switch would be located at each exterior entrance into a dwelling
unit and that switches should be located in such a manner that egress from
any habitable room to the exterior of the dwelling unit could be lit in
case of an emergency. Kuebler showed the Appeals Board a diagram of the
floor plan, drawn from memory, with the approval of Mr. Edmonds.
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 140IIIES
HOUSING APPEAL- .,OARD
September 27, 1979
Page 5
Steinbach presented the policy that was being used by the Housing Division
in regards to the light switch requirement, since there was some gray area
as to the way the requirement is written. He then went to the blackboard
to illustrate the light switch installations being required of
Mr. Edmonds. Existing switches were diagrammed and their functions were
noted. Steinbach stated that light switches would be required at the
exterior entrances to a dwelling unit; however, if there were more than
two such exterior entrances, since the Housing Code only requires two
means of egress, the same policy is being applied with regard to light
switches in that only two exterior entrances would need to have switches
for the purpose of illuminating those rooms adjacent to the entrances.
Steinbach stated that due to the ambiguity of the code language in regards
to light switches, that it had been extremely difficult to formulate a
policy to be used to enforce the requirement. Since every dwelling unit
is different, the department would certainly welcome any suggestions from
the Housing Appeals Board in formulating a policy regarding said
enforcement.
VanderZee questioned Mr. Edmonds in regards to the fact that this was a
request inspection.
Edmonds replied that he and two associates had decided to purchase the
property and wanted to make sure that it conformed to the requirements of
the Housing Code. Upon receiving the notice of violation, they felt that
the requirement of light switches was unreasonable and that all the other
violations were, in fact, items which they agreed should be corrected. He
stated that even though he did not expect the Board to take it into
consideration, the installation of said light switches would create an
initial hardship for the owners because at this point they were only
breaking even on the investment.
Graf questioned Mr. Edmonds as to the current use of the dwelling since it
i had been stated that the supplied facilities, i.e. kitchen facilities were
located in the basement for those roomers who occupy the second floor.
Edmonds replied that the house was owned, and the rooming units were
operated by, the prior owner who maintained her living quarters on the
first floor and that the tenants seemed to be quite satisfied with the
geographic location of the supplied facilities.
There was some question as to what sort of illuminaries or lights were
being required by the Code at this time. Steinbach clarified the
intention of the Code by stating that it was necessary that there be a
wall mounted switch which activated an illuminary within the habitable
room. A viable substitution for a switch would be wall mounted light
fixture with a switch attached to it.
Kuebler went to the blackboard and made clarification of the light
switches that were being required by the City.
Edmonds stated that in certain parts of the dwelling, he felt that there
was enough spill light from other rooms to meet the requirements of the
Code.
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS•DES IIOIREs
HOUSING APPEAL. BOARD
September 27, 1979
Page 6
VanderZee stated that the policy being implemented by the City could be
much more stringent than it was in that they could be requiring a light
switch at each and every entrance to a room, therefore requiring a light
switch on each side of every entry between rooms.
VanderZee moved, Dennis seconded, that the notice of violation be upheld
as amended. After some confusion and extensive clarification, "amended"
was determined to mean that a light switch would be required at the
exterior entrance to the kitchen, at the exterior entrance to the living
room, and at the entrance to the living room from the kitchen. Motion
carried unanimously.
Smithey, who had been absent for the first part of the meeting, joined the
other board members.
VanderZee left the meeting.
BOARD TO HEAR THE CASE OF MRS. REGINA HENNESSEY -
234 N. Mg5IS0N
Those present in the Hennessey party were Mrs. Regina Hennessey, Mrs.
Hennessey's son, Paul, Attorney David Poula, and tenant Thomas Mishak.
Those who would testify were sworn in by Chairperson Klaus.
an
Steinbach
inspectiontn
atthis property June 26, and oInspector
July23 he issued a notKellVezina iceofviolation to Mrs. Hennessey. This notice of violation was received by Mr.
Paul Hennessey on July 25. A letter requesting an appeal before the Board
i was received by the City Clerk on July 31, it was written by Atty. David
P. Poula. Steinbach stated that subsequent to the notice of violation
being issued to Mrs. Hennessey, an administrative review had been
conducted and it was found that two of the items listed on the notice of
violations had been sited under the incorrect chapter numbers. A notice
was then sent to Mr. Poula and Mrs. Hennessey to inform them of the proper
code sections.
Paula stated that pursuant to the notice of violation, all of the elec-
trical work being required had already been done and that in regards to
the lack of valid permit, he had in his possession a "certificate of
compliance" so that the only violation being appealed at this time was the
lack of required window area in Mrs. Hennessey's dwelling unit.
The letter written in clarification of the notice of violation was read
into the record by Inspector Vezina and accepted by the Board as part of
the public record. Inspector Vezina then went to the blackboard where he
had drawn a diagram of the entire basement of Mrs. Hennessey's dwelling.
He stated the requirements of the State Code regarding window area and
also gave the board information concerning the required amount of window
area if a window is to be used for the second means of egress.
Smithey questioned whether the requirement for a second means of egress
had been cited on the notice of violation. Inspector Vezina replied that
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 1401IIES
HOUSING APPEAL_ BOARD
September 27, 1979
Page 7
no, it had not, however the information was being supplied to the Appeals
Board such that, if Mrs. Hennessey were required to install more or larger
windows in her dwelling unit, that this requirement would certainlbe a
consideration in said installation. y
Poula asked when the requirement of window area had been adopted as a City
Code.
Steinbach stated that to the best of his knowledge, it would seem logical
that since this requirement was found in the State Housing Code, that it
would have been part of the Iowa City Housing Code at whatever time the
housing code was adopted by the City. The specific date was not
determined; however, Poula stated that it really was not necessary
information for this hearing.
Mrs. Hennessey stated that she had lived at this dwelling for 50 years, it
had been a rooming house for 50 years, and that there was no longer any
private property surrounding her dwelling. She stated that all adjacent
property
belongedf Iowa.
whichShasstloc t daacrossCtity
he
street, and built a waterworks there. She stated that she had no place to
go except for where she was. According to Mr. Poula's question to Mrs.
Hennessey, she stated that approximately 20 years ago, an agreement had
been reached between Mr. Poula's senior partner; Mr. Cahill, and the
University stating that Mrs. Hennessey could live at her residence as long
as she wanted to. She stated that this was the only reason she was the
last one still living in this neighborhood. She stated that her age was
88 years and that she wished to live at her residence until she died.
Paul Hennessey stated that he had all the electrical work done that had
been requested and that the total cost had been $1244. He stated that the
monthly income on the property was approximately $450.
i
Poula stated that it is unreasonable for the City to require Mrs.
Hennessey to add approximately $10400 of windows since the University
will acquire Mrs. Hennessey's property upon her death. He stated that he
was asking the Housing Appeals Board to overrule this requirement and to
let Mrs. Hennessey live in peace and she should have the right to live
wherever she wants to.
Graf stated that she felt they could not require Mrs. Hennessey to change
the windows since this is her private residence and the City does not
require that of other owner occupied residences.
Steinbach stated it had been the previous policy of the division not to
inspect those portions of a rental property which were occupied by the
owner. However, as of a year ago, inspections had begun of each and every
dwelling unit within a complex or rooming house for the purpose of
determining total compliance within any given structure so that when a
rental permit was issued, it could be shown from a liability standpoint of
the City that the whole structure conformed to the requirements of the
Code.
i- -- - - .. .,..,..,
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES
HOUSING APPEALa dOARD
September 27, 1979
Page 8
Cook submitted information found in the Housing Code which gives authority
of the Housing Inspector to inspect all dwelling units which are either
lived in by an owner/operator or by tenants. She stated that the scope of
the Housing Code would include private dwellings within the City. She
stated that an administrative policy was such that inspections were only
conducted on single family dwellings due to complaints or in a situation
such as this where the owner lived in one of the units located within the
rooming house or apartment building.
Poula stated that this structure had been built some 80 years ago and that
it had been operated as a rooming house for at least 50 years and that the
lack of required window area in no way affected the tenants which rented
from Mrs. Hennessey.
It was also stated that there were no grandfather clauses which would
affect this window requirement.
Poula stated; the fact that Mrs. Hennessey continues to live at this
residence is due to an oral agreement by the University that
Mrs. Hennessey can continue to live at this residence for as long as she
lives. This agreement has been honored by the University through at least
a half a dozen instances.
Steinbach asked Mrs. Hennessey and Mr. Poula if this residence had in some
way changed use, i.e. was the basement originally built as a basement or
was it originally constructed as a dwelling unit.
Mr. Hennessey and Mr. Poula replied that the basement rooms had been used
for sleeping purposes by Mr. Hennessey and Mrs. Hennessey for
approximately 49 years. Mr. Hennessey's bedroom was originally the coal
room.
Poula submitted to the Board a certificate of compliance issued in March,
1978. This was done to show that Mrs. Hennessey was not operating without
a valid permit.
Vezina stated that, although it is not noted on the certificate of
compliance, the expiration date would be in May, 1979.
Mr. Hennessey stated that it was the City's fault in not contacting
Mrs. Hennessey to let her know that a new permit must be applied for at
the proper time.
After further inspection of the property file, it was found that
application for a housing permit was made on June 6, 1979. Inspector
Vezina explained to the Board members the policy regarding application for
a permit and the scheduling of annual inspections. It was then noted that
a permit is not issued until all corrections are made; however, a copy of
a permit application is sent to the owner if proper application has been
made and a fee has been paid. Poula stated, for the record, that the only
violations that are being appealed are those of lack of valid permit and
lack of required window area.
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS•DES 110111ES
HOUSING APPEAL- BOARD
September 27, 1979
Page 9
Smithey stated that due to the unusual aspects of this case that he felt
it was the Board's responsibility to treat it as a separate case and
therefore he moved that the violation of lack of permit be upheld and that
the violation of lack of required window area not be upheld. Graf
seconded, motion passed by unanimous vote.
BOARD TO CONSIDER THE CASE OF ROBERT RHODES -
611 N. JOHNSON
Mr. Rhodes and Atty. Ralph Neuzil were sworn in by Chairperson Klaus.
Steinbach stated that the property was inspected by Inspector Brian
Kuebler on August 2, 1979. Mr. Rhodes received a notice of violation
regarding the property on August 6. On August 10, a letter was received
by the City Clerk from Mr. Rhodes requesting a hearing before the Housing
Appeals Boar. Therefore, the appeal was properly submitted.
Kuebler asked Mr. Rhodes for further clarification of the actual items
being appealed.
Mr. Neuzil replied that they wished to amend the appeal due to the fact
that after Mr. Rhodes had contacted a carpenter, a doorway listed as a
violation could not, in fact, be raised to meet the requirements of the
Code without causing structural problems. That item is listed as 3.a.
Lack of sufficient doorway height. It was agreed by all in attendance
that this matter could also be addressed at this hearing.
Kuebler stated that in his annual inspection it was determined that the
maximum ceiling height in the basement unit was six feet, six inches.
Kuebler read into the minutes Chapter 17-6.(d) which he stated was the
reference made on the notice of violation, however, the less restrictive
code section which would actually apply to this case was 17-6.(f)3.
Inspector Kuebler then read that code section into the minutes. He stated
that the less restrictive code section required a 7 foot ceiling in the
basement apartment. In the basement unit the minimum ceiling height was 6
feet, 4 inches and the maximum height was 6 feet, 6 inches. He also stated
as per the amended appeal, that the doorway in question measured 5 feet, 9
inches in height, whereas, the requirement for the height of said door is
6 feet, 4 inches.
Cook asked Atty. Neuzil whether he would accept the amended code section.
Mr. Neuzil replied that he had no objection to that amendment.
Mr. Rhodes stated, in response to questions asked by Mr. Neuzil, that he
had purchased the property a little over four years ago and that at time
of purchase there was representation that the dwelling did comply with the
Housing Code. He stated that the basement apartment had been in use for
at least 25 years and that during the inspection, Inspector Kuebler had
stated that it was one of the nicer apartments he had inspected. lie
stated that currently the building is not paid for; however, the money
received from rental of this unit was necessary to make payments on the
building. He stated that if the Appeals Board were to uphold the City's
violation, that the only means of correction would be to raise the whole
house or to lower and replace the floor.
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MONIES
HOUSING APPEAL. BOARD
September 27, 1979
Page 10
Mr. Neuzil asked Mr. Rhodes how much equity he had in the house. Mr.
Rhodes replied that the property was appraised at $55,000 last May. He
stated that he would have to sell the property if he could not continue to
rent out the basement unit. There have never been any complaints from
tenants due to the lack of required ceiling height.
Neuzil asked Kuebler if he was aware of the reason that there was such a
requirement. Kuebler replied that it was not instituted for the purpose
of headroom, that the purpose, to his understanding, was for air space,
especially in case of a fire. It would provide a few extra seconds or
minutes for a person to have time to escape from a unit. Kuebler stated
that he was not prepared to determine the safety aspects of the apartment
regarding the current ceiling height.
Neuzil asked Kuebler when this property was last inspected in order to
issue a permit. Kuebler replied that according to the file a reinspection
had been conducted to determine code compliance in 1977. Mr. Rhodes
concurred with that information. Kuebler stated the last applicable
permit regarding this property expired in April, 1978.
The age of the structure was discussed by the Board, however, an actual
date of construction could not be determined at this meeting, nor, could
any change of use or classification in accordance with the exemption
clause of the Housing Code.
Smithey asked Mr. Rhodes, as had Mr. Neuzil, how much equity he had in the
house. Mr. Rhodes replied that he had paid $289 a month on the property
since he purchased it, and that he had put approximately $4,000 into the
house in the form of windows and about that much also in the form of
furnaces for each floor. He stated that he had mortgaged the house that
he lives in now in order to purchase the property.
i Smithey explored the question of equity a bit further by asking what would
be the financial impact if the Board were to uphold this notice of
violation. Mr. Neuzil replied that he would definitely have to sell the
property if this violation was upheld, Mr. Rhodes concurred.He stated
that with the loss of income from the basement apartment, $160 monthly, he
would not have enough to keep up payments on his other responsibilities of
paying for the windows and furnaces. He stated that total income on the
property per month is $600.
Klaus felt that a consideration which could be made would be to postpone a
decision regarding the ceiling height to see if more information could be
gathered as to the age of the house and whether it would fall within the
scope of the grandfather clause.
Steinbach voiced an objection to that proposal since, if it could be
proven to the Housing Inspector that the structure did meet the quali-
fications, enforcement of that citation would at that time be suspended.
He stated that even if the Board chose to uphold the violation, the City
would drop enforcement under those circumstances.
f�_— _ -- —,..,,,
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES
HOUSING APPEAL, BOARD
September 27, 1979
Page 11
Neuzil stated that Mr. Rhodes had done every reasonable thing a
prospective buyer could do in regards to purchasing a property, and that
he felt that the City keeps changing rules and that it is not fair to the
property owner that they are made to comply with all new changes that the
City wishes to make. He further asked that if this requirement was a
state law at the time Mr. Rhodes purchased the property, why did the City
go ahead and certify the use of the basement unit. He felt that the City
is penalizing the owner for a mistake of the City.
Cook asked the board members to refer to the memorandum which was included
in the board members' packets written by Angela Ryan regarding the
estoppel argument. She stated that if an inspector had misapplied the law
with no intent to deceive the owner, then the City could not be held
responsible for such actions. She stated that it was her opinion that
there was no intent to deceive or defraud in the past.
Steinbach stated that this violation was probably found at this time due
to the fact that, initiated one year ago was the policy of drawing floor
plans of those structures which the City inspects annually and issues
rental permits for. This is done to show that an accurate and thorough
inspection is conducted at that time.
Neuzil asked that if the purpose of the Board was simply to hear and
uphold notices of violation without applying a sensitivity to the problem,
why was the option of having an appeal heard before the Board even
implemented. He felt that it may be just as well to start a lawsuit in
district court rather than take the time to go before the Housing Appeals
Board. He asked whether it was not the purpose of this hearing to
determine a practical way to solve the problem. He felt that jacking up
the house six inches or lowering the floor six inches was not a practical
way to comply with the code. He asked why there could not be some sort of
variance granted if all of the other requirements were met, provided that
all other requirements were met. He asked if this was a serious enough
violation to warrant the closing of the entire dwelling unit.
i
Discussion ensued regarding a valid permit. Neuzil stated that they would
concede that they do not have, at this time, a valid housing permit.
Dennis moved that items 1, 3 and 5 of the notice of violation be upheld.
Motion died for lack of second.
Smithey, too, questioned the purpose of the Housing Appeals Board, stating
that, on one hand, he felt it was Board's responsibility to rely on the
decisions made in courts of -law, but that to his knowledge only one or two
decisions of the Housing Appeals Board have been further appealed in
district court and he did not remember that they dealt with this
particular violation. He stated that he would very much like to hear what
the district court would have to say regarding this housing violation. He
further stated that the constitutionality of these requirements could be
determined in district court and such a precedent would be quite helpful
to the Housing Appeals Board. Smithey stated that the estoppel argument
was of great concern to him and that if the Appeals Board does not grant
exceptions in particular cases, then the burden and expense of a decision
in district court is put on the owner.
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOVIES
HOUSING APPEAL..;OARD
September 27, 1979
Page 12
Klaus stated that recently it had been the determination of the City
Council that they would not intervene in a decision which should be made
by the Housing Appeals Board. It is the purpose of the Housing Appeals
Board to make decisions in regards to interpretations of the Code.
Cook stated that it was her feeling that the violation of ceiling height
being discussed did not leave any flexibility to the Board in making its
final determination because the interpretation of the Code, she felt was
quite specific.
Klaus stated that the situation was such that the Housing Appeals Board
was appointed by the City Council and that the staff was actually
responsible to the City Manager. However, Cook replied that her
responsibility was also to represent the Housing Appeals Board.
Smithey stated that there is an obvious conflict there, in that, the
attorney must represent both the board and the staff.
Smithey stated the situation at hand is such that the City is intervening
between an agreement between the landlord and the tenant. He felt that
perhaps the responsibility of the board would be to intervene in this
conflict. He felt that perhaps it was the responsibility of the Housing
Appeals Board to force the City into court to resolve this problem.
Klaus stated that members of the Housing Appeals Board were, of course,
also members of the Housing Commission. The duty of the Housing
Commission is to find adequate housing and there is some conflict, in that
the Housing Appeals Board is forced to, in effect, close other housing
units.
Neuzil asked that if a case is real close in regards to complying or not
complying with the code, where is the cutoff of those violations which
would be cited. Cook replied that there is discretion implemented;
however, she did not feel that this was a close case.
Cook asked Mr. Rhodes whether he had purchased this property with the
advice of legal counsel.
Mr. Rhodes replied that yes, in fact, he had retained an attorney to
research the property prior to purchase. He stated that at time of
purchase there was a valid permit issued for the property.
The Board asked Inspector Kuebler to explain his finding regarding
inadequate plumbing.
Kuebler stated that during his inspection, it was found that the faucet on
the tub was located below the rim of the tub and that that constituted a
violation insofar as it could cause a backflow problem and water
contamination. He then explained the series of events that could lead to
such backflow and water contamination. He submitted a diagram which is
part of an inspection manual issued by the government showing how this
installation could constitute inadequate and dangerous plumbing. Kuebler
further stated that after a discussion with the Plumbing Inspector of the
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOIRES
HOUSING APPEAL_ BOARD
September 27, 1979
Page 13
City, he was informed that there are installations in Iowa City such that
if a second floor faucet is in the open position and a first floor faucet
is opened, smoke from say, a cigarette, would be drawn right into the
faucet on the second floor.
The Board considered the question of if there was no motion regarding the
case, what would be the outcome. It was determined that precedents have
been set in previous appeals board hearings that the violation would be
upheld in such an event.
Board took a three minute break.
Graf left the hearing.
Klaus asked Cook if the City had pursued any cases in court regarding the
ceiling height violation. Cook replied no, not to her knowledge. Smithey
then asked Steinbach if there were any cases where the Board had upheld a
notice of violation regarding ceiling height and the City had pursued no
further enforcement action. Steinbach replied no, that to the best of his
knowledge the City had gone ahead and enforced the decision of the Housing
Appeals Board.
Klaus brought up the fact that there had been a previous case that the
Housing Appeals Board had not upheld the City in a notice of violation and
that the Director of Housing & Inspection Services had recommended to the
City Council that the City appeal that decision in Court and that the City
Council had chosen not to do so. She said that particular case was based
on particular circumstances which warranted such action and that it was
not done to set a precedent and so the Appeals Board did not honor any
future arguments which were brought in connection with that specific case.
She stated that it was the Council's decision to appeal any decisions made
by the Housing Appeals Board. Klaus stated that there is one other case
currently in court that the Council has chosen to appeal the decision of
the Board; however, the Council has not asked for any resignations from
any members of the Board.
Smithey moved, Dennis seconded, that M1, Lack of valid permit be upheld,
and that k3, N4, and N5 dealing with inadequate plumbing, lack of
sufficient doorway height, and lack of required ceiling height not be
upheld.
Klaus stated for the record that in not upholding these violations, it was
an attempt to get the Council to pursue these types of problems in the
Housing Code.
Smithey stated that he wanted it also on the record that the Board did not
feel that the staff was in error in issuing this notice of violation and
this decision was not meant to set a precedent for future inspections.
Cook stated that she would be much more comfortable with the board's
decision if the evidence presented would show that in upholding this
violation it would, from a financial viewpoint, constitute a "taking"
Smithey stated that he felt that this had already been implied by
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS•DES 140111ES
r
HOUSING APPEAL_ dOARD
September 27, 1979
Page 14
Mr. Rhodes' statements. Cook replied that as an evidentiary matter, she
did not feel that had been proven. The City is not authorized to take
property without due process.
Smithey's motion to uphold violation #1 and not uphold #3, #4 and #5 was
passed by unanimous'vote.
OTHER BUSINESS
Steinbach stated that he has received a couple of requests for hearings
which were filed past the 10 day deadline. He further stated that the
City has tried to give everyone appeal rights in a generous fashion;
however, he was not comfortable with accepting these late requests. He
stated that it is obvious that enforcement of the Housing Code has been
stepped up, otherwise there would not be backlog at this time of some 28
cases. He stated that the individuals requesting these hearings had
contacted him personally and he had told them he would take their requests
to the Housing Appeals Board. However, he stated; it must be the City's
stance that they not be honored since it is administrative policy and City
law that application be made within a prescribed amount of time. He
stated that if the appeal deadline were to end on a weekend day, that he
would accept applications for an appeal hearing on the following Monday.
However, such was not the case in the two letters that he was presenting
at this time.
It was the Board's decision that individuals had waived their appeal
rights if they had not made proper application within the prescribed
amount of time.
Meeting adjourned.
PREPARED BY:
APPROVED BY:
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES
3
V Minutes: Iowa City Airport Commission
September 20, 1979
Iowa City Civic Center
Members Present: Bleckwenn, Embree, Redick,
Saeugling
Members Absent: Phipps
Summary of Discussion and Actions Taken:
The meeting was called to order by Saeugling, in the absence of
Chairman Phipps. Approval of the minutes of the August meeting
was deferred until next month. It was moved by Embree, second
by Bleckwenn to approve the bills for the month. Motion carried.
Embree reported that she had inspected Sturgis Ferry Park, and that
she could substantiate Gleaves' allegations that the City uses it
for an equipment dump and salvage yard. She reported that the City
Manager assures that it will be cleaned up this fall. General
discussion followed.
Bill Gilpin, Chairman of the Iowa City Riverfront Commission, and
Mary Ann Milkman presented their proposals for the design and
location of a boat ramp on the Iowa River. It would be on the
west bank, directly across from the airport's brick hangar, which
sits next to the threshold of runway 24. Design plans were
distributed to Commission members. General discussion followed.
i Embree asked why the Riverfront Commission chose that particular
location. Milkman replied that the local fishermen would like to
j have a ramp close to the Burlington St. dam. She also commented that,
at present, there is no boat ramp on the Iowa River in Iowa City.
Also, the location proposed is near highway 218, a main entryway to
j Iowa City; a dock there would focus attention on the river.
Gilpin reported that the funding will come 50/50 from the State
Conservation Commission Marine Fuel Tanks Fund and from Community
Development. Embree asked about other possible locations. Milkman
reported that a ramp could not be built near the sewage plant
because of many eddies and currents, and also the liability of
people walking around the open tanks. Napoleon Park was another
possibility, however it is farther downstream from the Burlington
St. dam than the proposed site. General discussion followed.
f Redick asked if the ICMAC would be making a statement as to owner -
i ship of the property in question by permitting a boat ramp to be
built there. Gilpin quoted a letter from Berlin, dated July 16,179
f stating that it would not affect the position of the ICMAC or City
Council as to ownership. General discussion followed.
Jones commented that the Riverfront Commission's proposed site near
the airport's hangar was, in his opinion, ideal, and he encouraged
such a development. General discussion followed. It was moved by
Bleckwenn, second by Redick, that the ICMAC conditionally O.K. the
construction of the Riverfront Commission's proposed boatramp on
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES
1:
(2)
said Sturgis Ferry Park, conditions being:
(1) that the ICMAC's attorney review any ramifications of
ownership on said land
(2) that the total area of the ramp and park be within
the approach zone to runway 29
(3) that a proper lease be drawn between the ICMAC and
the city of Iowa City outlining the legal boundries of
said land.
Motion carried, with Bleckwenn, Redick, and Saeugling voting aye,
Embree nay.
Dave Byers, the Master Plan consultant, presented the major alter-
natives open to the ICRAC and the Iowa City communitys
(1) no development of the airport
(2) obtain a new site
(3) develop the existing site
Advantages and disadvantages of each alternative were discussed.
General discussion followed. Embree stated that many people would
not accept lengthening a runway as a primary alternative. Redick
commented that while many people would be in favor adding aircraft
parking spaces and taxiway lights, they would not be in favor of
longer runways. General discussion followed. Byers commented, in
response to several questions, that should plans for runway extension
be on the Master Plan Study for 1986-90, the runway would not
necessarily have to be extended between 186 and '90. General discussion
followed.
Embree questioned the part of the Master Plan Study (MPS) which stated
that jets cannot be prevented from using the Iowa City airport.
Byers answered that the statement stemmed from a Federal Court case
involving the Santa Monica airport. General discussion followed.
iByers stated that the money to improve the existing airport would
come from the FAA's planning grant program which is funded by people
who buy aircraft tires, airline tickets, and avgas. General discussion
followed. Embree commented that on the next MPS draft, she would
like to see more footnotes, page numbers, better spelling and
punctuation, and less text ambiguity. She specified that the draft
should explain how the estimated costs were obtained. General
discussion followed.
Redick asked about the status of the environmental impact statement.
Byers reported that the environmental assessment report can't be
written until the ICMAC decides which alternative to go with. He
also reported that, for federal funding, the ICMAC needs only an
airport layout plan and an environmental assessment report. General
discussion followed.
Carol deProsse asked that three points be clarified:
(1) that the figures used in the MPS forecasts through the
year 2000 are in 1979 dollars] Byers stated that they
were.
(2) would the MPS address the question of what land might be
acquired by Iowa City as a protective area around the air-
port; Byers stated that this would not be done until the
ICMAC recommends an alternative, e.g, to develop the
existing site. In that case, the problem of acquiring
land would be part of airport development and would be
part of the study.
(3) an explanation of the court case in Santa Monica;
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOINES
(3)
Byers stated that he would try to obtain documentation
within a week.
Ed Thomas questioned whether the Kimball Co. has studied what he
termed deficiencies and points of violation around the airport.
He stated that these should be in the report. General discussion
followed.
Mr. Sonnig mentioned that although prime farmland would be sacri-
ficed for a new airport, industry does this anyway. Byers commented
that it is not easy or sometimes possible to take someone's farm
to use for an airport. Sonnig commented that the Kimball Co. has
based its study on projected use of the Iowa City airport. New
developments may take place in the next twenty years to make the
airport insufficient. Byers reported that the first two forecasts
are for ten years, and that such things as hangars and aprons
would be built on demand. General discussion followed.
Ken Lowder asked if Byers could project ten to twenty years into
the future to get the impact of the airport on the surrounding area,
with and without a runway extension. Byers stated that if the
ICMAC opts for developing the existing site, that such a study will
be added to his contract. Lowder commented that the existing study
shows no recommendation to change the situation of people affected
by the traffic pattern at Iowa City. Byers reported that noise
abatement will be part of the MPS after the ICMAC makes a decision
concerning the three major alternatives.
Dale Rockenbrach commented that advancements in aircraft technology
might soon permit jets to land safely on relatively short runways.
Byers reported that the MPS has taken that into account. Rockenbrach
also commented on the monetary.advanbages of building a completely
new airport. Duane Ingram commented that a new airport would not
be the equivalent of the present one, as it would have only two
runways. He also commented that should a certain runway be made
more convenient to pilots, they would use it more often, and thus
avoid runways with potential noise problems.
Dick Blum, chairman of the Iowa City Planning and Zoning Commission
(ICPZC) stated that his commission is considering providing the
ICMAC with a plan of artificial surfaces through which ground
construction couldn't penetrate. It was moved by Bleckwenn, second
by Redick that the ICMAC endorse and actively encourage the ICPZC
to proceed with flat plane zoning of the Iowa City area. Motion
carried.
Saeugling read a letter from the FAA dated August 17, 179, concerning
student flying restrictions. Redick read a letter from Willard Binns
in which he reported that a Crystal -Shamrock airplane flew too low
over his house, near the Iowa City airport, on August 28, 179. Redick
had a similar complaint. It was moved by Redick, second by Embree
to direct the chairman of the ICMAC to write to Crystal -Shamrock
Airlines in Minneapolis, advising them that they are creating anxiety
in the Iowa City community, and to suggest that they land at Cedar
Rapids if possible. It also should be suggested that, when landing
at Iowa City, they avoid overflying residential areas. Motion carried,
with Embree, Redick, and Saeugling voting aye, Bleckwenn abstained.
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS•DES 1101OES
a
1'
i
i
i
i
I
I
j
i
I
(4)
It was moved by Bleckwenn, second by Redick that the ICMAC hold
a special meeting at noon at the Iowa City airport on Thursday,
September 27, to inspect the physical plant. Motion carried.
Redick reported that Ken Lowder has arranged for EPA lawyer
Bob Wright to talk to the ICMAC and FAA people about actions that
the community can take concerning noise abatement. A tentative
date for the meeting has been set for October 11.
It was moved by Embree, second by Redick that a Public Information
Meeting be held Thursday, September 27, at 700 PM in the Iowa City
Civic Center. Motion carried.
The meeting adjourned at 10145 PM.
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MONIES
i
i
i
i
I
I
j
i
I
i
I
I
I
(
I
1
It
I
I
i
i
(4)
It was moved by Bleckwenn, second by Redick that the ICMAC hold
a special meeting at noon at the Iowa City airport on Thursday,
September 27, to inspect the physical plant. Motion carried.
Redick reported that Ken Lowder has arranged for EPA lawyer
Bob Wright to talk to the ICMAC and FAA people about actions that
the community can take concerning noise abatement. A tentative
date for the meeting has been set for October 11.
It was moved by Embree, second by Redick that a Public Information
Meeting be held Thursday, September 27, at 700 PM in the Iowa City
Civic Center. Motion carried.
The meeting adjourned at 10145 PM.
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MONIES
. -.
Iowa City Airport Commission
Master Plan Study Public Information Meeting #3
Na_r Alternatives
Iowa City Civic Center - 27 September 79
Airport Commission
Members Present: Bleckwenn, Embree, Phipps, Redick,
Saeugling
Summar of discussion:
Phipps called the meeting to order at 7:30PM, and turned the
meeting over to Dave Byers, the Master Plan Study (MPS)
consultant. Byers stated that the background for the major
alternatives came from Phase I of the MPS, e.g, traffic forecasts,
airport capacity to accommodate that traffic, and facility require-
ments to meet future needs. Byers listed, as major alternatives,
(1) no development,(2) obtain a new site, (3) develop existing site.
Advantages and disadvantages of each were discussed; Byers recom-
mended developing the existing site. He showed plans of the
airport, illustrating different improvements, such as new parking
areas and taxiways. Byers emphasized that the ICMAC is not
obligated to go along with any one of the alternatives. or
suggestions for airport improvements; they are simply his own
recommendations. He did comment, however, that the FAA would
probably not fund much that wasn't on a MPS. Byers then opened the
meeting for questions and comments from the public.
Barry Ginsberg asked how long it would take to build a new airport.
Phipps said that, with all funding immediately available, it would
take one year. Ginsberg discussed the possibility of obtaining
municipal bonds, and related that to the financing of a new airport,
John Nett compared projected uses of airport land with current use.
He mentioned that the City could buy land around the airport, and
restrict its use. He stated that, on a twenty year scale, the
airport, at its present location, would be incompatible with the
city of Iowa City, and should be moved.
Elliott Full congratulated the Kimball Co. and Mr. Byers on a
careful and thoughtful study. He then asked about the financing
necessary to buy 'clear zones at the end of the runways. Byers
replied that full funding Could be obtained for that.
I
Mr. Sonnig did not agree that the MPS was either careful or thoughtful.
He stated that significant data was witheld. He also stated that
local pilots use a particular runway not because of wind conditions,
but because of accessibility and convenience. He suggested that
merely lengthening runway 6/29 would not guarantee that pilots
would use it a good deal of the time. Also, he pointed out that
the consultant's suggested taxiways would make 12/30 easily
accessible. Mr. Sonnig also discussed the consultant's recommen-
dations for new airport locations. Saeugling agreed that there
were better sites than those listed in the current phase of the MPs.
He commented that, in his opinion, Iowa City needs an airport, and
that it should be something more than a patchwork that will, in
his opinion, result from the consultant's report.
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES
(2)
Ed Thomas stated that he didn't like the report. He stated
that it did not include violations around the current airport
facility; specifically, approach clearance over highway 1 and 218.
Pete Peterson stated that the report was a good one. He discussed
runway extension, and commented that 6/24 was the only logical
choice. He had polled former airport commission members, and
found that they all agreed that Byers.' third alternative was
the practical solution to the difficult problem at hand. He
read a paper from the former commission members, concerning
the third alternative of improving the current airport.
John Redick stated that much data in the report was unsubstan-
tiated, but that there were good points made in the study,
particularly regarding improvements suggested for the existing
airport. He commented that the report did lack environmental
impact information. He also discussed runway extension, saying
that this would invite jet traffic. In addition, he stated that
the report too quickly dismisses the alternative concerning re-
locating the airport, which should be seriously considered.
Dick Blum, as chairman of Iowa City Planning and Zoning, showed
a comprehensive land use map. He showed that new housing was
excluded from critical approach and departure paths of the Iowa
City airport. He pointed out that no new subdivisions are
contemplated along existing approach and departure paths. His
personal comments first concerned clarification of Byers' airport
plans, and possibilities for future traffic patterns. He then
commented that he doesn't think that the noise from airport traffic
has gotten worse in the past few years; he stated that it has been
improved in the years since United and Ozark left. He stated
that can be arranged to bar certain categories of aircraft from
certain runways. He also challenged pilots, members of the ICMAC,
and local citizens to join him to discuss the impact of aircraft
noise on the Iowa City community, and to help find a solution.
Barry Ginsberg commented that he would like to see data proving
that aviation is necessary for local business. He also discussed
whether an increase in business and industrialization would
lower property taxes - he thought not. Concerning the U. of Iowa
Hospital, yet not reflecting hospital policy, he discussed whether
it makes any difference if critically ill patients and transplant
organs are brought into the Cedar Rapids or Iowa City airport,
before they are transported to the hospital.
Ken Lowder stated that if the airport were redeveloped at its
present site, and if the city didn't grow and airport traffic
increased, the problems of noise and safety would also increase.
He remarked that this problem was not addressed in the MPS. Byers
replied that this was not in his contract. Lowder asked for evidence
that extending runway 6/24 sould decrease or alleviate noise and
safety problems for Iowa City. Byers explained that a computer
was used for that part of the study, and that it showed a sub-
stantial reduction in noise.
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOIRES
(3)
Dale Rockenbrach stated that moving the airport to a new loca-
tion should be given serious consideration in the study. He
also asked to whom one should complain about an airplane flying
to low. Phipps replied that the FAA was the proper agency.
Phipps commented that many people had been complaining to the
consultant, but that the ICMAC should also accept responsibility
for the study. He stated thet when the decision was made to
employ the consultant, the runways needed repair. The ICMAC
was irformed at that time that in order to receive federal funding,
it was necessary to have a MPS. Therefore, the study is a method
to get federal and state aid for runway and other airport repairs.
Ginsberg commented that the study was too qualitative. Phipps
stated that there was presently no funding available for a more
quantitative study. Sonnig asked what restricted the study, and
how much it cost. Byers replied that his report was outlined in
his contract, and that the study cost $32,000.
Dick Blum stated that when the concept of a MPS was first presented
two years ago, both the City Council and the ICMAC were opposed
to moving the airport. Three years ago, the Iowa City Comprehensive
Plan Committee looked at alternate sites for the airport, and
unanimously advised the ICMAC that the probability of relocating
the airport was virtually nil. In addition, he commented that
a new airport would invite more jet traffic, and that cities
generally tend to expand in the direction of the local airport.
E.K. Jones pointed out that the Iowa City Flying Service is one
of three companies in Iowa licensed to fly critically ill patients,
and that the Flying Service does transport many of them. He also
discussed the MPS of 1962. Saeugling stated that the MPS of 1962
did not preclude development near the airport.
Embree discussed keeping the airport open at its present site, and
and the need for compromise and public input. She commented that
the airport's present location was unsuitable for industrial
development, because of nearby housing and the high water table.
She stated that many local citizens are in favor of airport
improvement without runway extension. General diccussion followed.
Rockenbrach asked at what level of flight operations would a tower
be necessary. Byers stated that Iowa City was nowhere near it.
Lowder and Byers discussed the practicality of alternate site
selection. Phipps then closed the meeting to public discussion,
after asking if there were any further comments. Byers commented
that Phase II must be approved before he could continue with the
MPS. The possibility of expanding Byers' contract to include
additional research of alternate sites was discussed.
Embree stated that there sould be four major alternatives, instead
of threes (1) no improvement (2) alternate site (3) improve the present
airport (4) improve and expand the present facility. General
discussion followed. Resurfacing runway 17/35 was also discussed.
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOIRES
(4)
It was moved by Bleckwonn, second by Embree to defer any action
this evening, and that the Chairman should set up a working
meeting for the ICMAC and Byers so that corrections can be
made on Phase II. Motion carried. It was moved by Embree,
second by Bleckwenn to go ahead with the application for federal
funding for improvement of runway 17/35. Motion carried.
Phipps read the list of those who had applied for the position
of Airport Manager. Commission members had previously read their
applications, and selected their preferred candidates. They
collaborated on a list of candidates that everyone thought were
especially well-suited for the jobs
John Davis
Dennis Gordon
Ronald Hanelt
Ernest Nelson
James Wachendorf
Garret Winter
Fred Zehr
Richard Zmolek
Phipps commented that the City will send letters to all the appli-
cants as soon as the ICMAC indicates those to be interviewed.
A letter from the Department of Human Relations concerning such
applications was read.
The meeting was adjourned at 10s95PM.
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOINES
w
MINUTES
IOWA CITY PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
RECREATION CENTER ROOM B
SEPTEMBER 12, 1979
MEMBERS PRESENT: Boutelle, Crum, Hillman, Humbert, Berry
MEMBERS ABSENT: Thayer, McLaughlin, Hayek, Robertson
STAFF PRESENT: Howell, Lee, Showalter
SUMMARY OF DISCUSSION AND FORMAL ACTION TAKEN:
i
The June 13th minutes were approved.
i
Marilyn Nickelsburg was present to discuss the Chl'ldrens Museum.. She distributed
information regarding attendance for the
past 3 years and this summers programs.
Marilyn feels that it is no longer possible for the Friends to
operate the Museum as
they have in the past, due to lack of funding. This year, they didn''t open until
mid-June and will not be open on weekends this fall, The Museum directors have been
working 52 to 70 hours
per week, and only getting paid for 20 hours, CETA help is
becoming more unreliable. The availability of students for internship
from year to year. will vary
Showalter asked the Commission if they would like to recommend that funding for
Museum operations be included in the FY'81 Recreation operating budget. Lee has
a
prepared cost estimate of $7,500 for operation on weekends in the spring and fall
and 6 days week in the
per summer, It would be possible to reduce this some by using
interns,etc.
Boutelle asked Nickelsburg if the Friends board would still be active, and if they
would support and assist in Museum operation, Nickelsburg will meet with the board
and report back at the October
meeting,
I
The future of Black Hawk Mini-Park was discussed, Howell and Showalter felt that
the Park had been a splendid idea
and very successful, but that it was designed as
a temparary park, and if kept as a permanent park would require substantial attention,
The bricks are settling, causing low spots where water stands in the summer, and
freezes in the winter. After
considerable discussion it was decided that no recommenda-
tion on the future of the park be this
given at time.
Election of officers.
Berry nominated Crum for Chairperson. Unanimous
Crum nominated Hillman for Vice Chairperson, Unanimous
i
The meeting was adjourned at 9:30p.m.
f/
Dennis Showalter
! " j
1 �
Director-Parks and Recreation
�i
I
I
j
i
i
19�F3
I
I
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS-DES 610IIIES
MI
2V,
MINUTES
CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION
SEPTEMBER 22, 1979 8:00 AM
CIVIC CENTER, CITY MANAGER'S CONFERENCE ROOM
MEMBERS PRESENT: Anderson, Nusser, Orelup
STAFF PRESENT: Higdon
OTHERS PRESENT: Walker, Hearing Officer; Jay Honohan, Attorney for
Ronald R. Fort; and two members of the media
RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE CITY COUNCIL
None
RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE CITY MANAGER AND STAFF
None
RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE CITY ATTORNEY
None
SUMMARY OF RELEVANT DISCUSSION
Chair, Bill Nusser, presiding, called the meeting to order for the
specific purpose of considering the information from the public
hearing of September 17 which related to the Commission's decision
regarding the demotion of Ronald R. Fort and possibly arrive at a
decision. No other items are to come before this meeting. Nusser
expressed that he did not believe a closed session would be of any,
value if each member of the Commission had deliberated over the
information individually as he had. Anderson and Orelup agreed that
a closed session would not be necessary as there was no information
to exchange in a closed session that would be helpful to any of the
Commission members.
Attorney Honohan was given an opportunity to speak. He addressed
some comments to the media stating that he felt his client's rights
had been violated by the media flap and Fort was the one who had
suffered. He stated that the Commission was acting properly on
September 17, the media sneaked out and returned with a xeroxed copy
of the open meetings law and this was done only for the benefit of
the media. Honohan stated that open meetings are wonderful, we are
all for it, but in this instance the media had trampled on a
citizen's rights for the sole benefit of the media.
Orelup moved that the Civil Service Commission vote to rescind the
action of Harvey D. Miller of September 28, 1978 and to reinstate
Ronald R. Fort as a sergeant of the Iowa City Police Department
effective September 22, 1979. Anderson seconded. The vote was
unanimous in favor of the motion.
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOINES
Civil Service'",mmission
September 22, _j79
Page 2
Chair Nusser instructed Walker to prepare the necessary documents
for signature.
The meeting adjourned at 8:09 a.m.
Minutes prepared by June Higdon
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOINES
I
j
N
i
i
I
i
i
j
I
j
r
i
1
N
it
1j
j.
I<
i
l,l '
1
N
I
I
'i
i
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOINES
IOWA CITY HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION
September 4, 1979 7:30 PM
ENGINFERING CONFFRFNCF. ROOM
MEMBERS PRESENT: Braverman, Kuhn, Costantino, Reyes, Munzenmaier, Marcus
Yates, McGuire, McCartt.
MEMBERS ABSENT: None.
STAFF PRESENT: Brown, Morris, Mejia.
VISITORS: Woman from radio station not introduced.
RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE CITY COUNCIL:
None
RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE CITY MANAGER AND STAFF:
Staff is to prepare a monthly flow chart for complaints. Civil Rights
Specialist is to put probable cause or no probable cause at the end of
investigative report. Staff is t0 report on the progress of the City as
a model employer.
SUMMARY OF RELEVANT DISCUSSION:
1. The September 4, 1979 meeting was called to order at 7:30 PM by
Chairman Braverman.
2. Committee of Priorities discussed their purpose which was to look
at projects outside of what the commission does as a whole and
make suggestions for relevant projects.
3. The Human Rights Ordinance was discussed. It was decided that the
basic concerns are:
A. To look at the ordinance as it pertains to processing complaints.
The possibility of hiring an outside consultant to investigate
procedures and process was discussed. Who to get to do this was
discussed and the fact that the Human Ri0hts Commission does not
have a budget was mentioned.
B. The question of the Human Rights Commission processing complaints
against the city was discussed.
C. The possibility of reviewing internally using city staff was
discussed.
D. As a result of the above discussion, the following motion was
made by Munzenmaier and seconded by Kuhn. Motion that the
Commission conduct an investigation of the City's Human Rights
Ordinance and all promulgations of that ordinance utilizing
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 1401NES
1945
. e
Human Rights Commissi,,.,
September 4, 1979
Page 2
such internal and external resources as are necessary. Areas
of concentration shall be:
1• parallel structuring to 601A,
2. jurisdictional authority,
3. procedural aspects.
Further, that two commissioners be appointed by the chair to
initiate this investigation and monitor its progress and report
back to the commission as a whole and formalize final recommen-
dations to the commission.
4. As part of the above the possibility of hiring legal independent
counsel for the commission in the event of a public hearing was
discussed. The motion was made by Marcus and seconded by Braverman
that in the event the commission decides to hold its own public
hearing, an outside legal consultant will be hired for the interim
period of the investigation.
The question of this being a simple motion or a bylaws change was
brought up. The motion was tabled by a unanimous vote.
5. Discussion of guidelines for processing of complaints. It was
suggested that a three month time period be used as a reasonable
guide from the time of the complaint to the time the investigative
j team receives the report. It was suggested that a status report/
i tracking sheet should be initiated to more closely monitor the
Rrocess. The eyes. Motion ftolhave gmotion
aspart ofsthe dmonthly e by treport aes and eflow echary
t
of every complaint beginning with when the complaint is formally
filed. specify when the case was received, assigned, went to legal,
current status.
Motion carried unanimously.
6. Motion was made by McGuire and seconded by Yates that the Director
of the Human Relations Department or her designated appointee
report on the progress of the City as a model employer at monthly
commission meetings (i.e. what kinds of changes are being made to
encourage minorities and females).
Motion carried unanimously.
i
7. Motion was made by McGuire and seconded by Yates that money be
approved for ID's for the Commissioners.
It was mentioned by Pat Brown that the City has an arrangement
with the bank for ID photographs for employees so Commissioners
should be able to get IDs there.
Motion carried unanimously.
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES
.,
Human Rights Commission
September 4, 1979
Page 3
8. Motion made by McGuire and seconded by Yates that the Civil Rights
Specialist put the probable cause or no probable cause finding aL
the end of the investigative reports.
All voted aye except Yates who abstained.
9. It was brought up that what has been learned from Woodfield's in
terms of the complaint process and public hearings should be put
on the agenda for a future meeting.
10. Motion was made by McGuire and seconded by Yates that the commission
hold an open house that is well publicized as a method of letting
the public know the commission exists and that this be done some
time in October.
A Human Rights Day with movies, panels, etc. was suggested. It was
decided to find out what is available and go from there in determin-
ing a date. A public hearing was suggested. This would be a public
hearing on the commission at which minorities, women and handicapped
could ask questions, bring complaints and suggestions. Employers
could be invited to tell what is wrong with the commissions procedures
from their point of view.
Original motion withdrawn.
Motion made by McGuire and seconded by Yates that a subcommittee
be assigned to draw up a tentative program and date for some
type of public event.
Motion carried unanimously. Braverman appointed Reyes, Marcus,
Kuhn and Yates as a subcommittee.
Meeting adjourned at 9:00 PM.
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOVIES
MINUTES
IOWA CITY PUBLIC LIBRARY
BOARD OF TRUSTEES
REGULAR MEETING
September 27, I979
Director's Office 3:30 I'M
MEMBERS PRESENT:
MEMBERS ABSENT:
STAFF PRESENT:
HANSEN LIND MEYER:
OTHERS PRESENT:
Summary of Discussion
Bartley, Bezanson, Gritsch, Hyman, Immermann,
Ostedgaard, Richerson, Zastrow
None
Eggers, Tiffany, Ingersoll, Kelley, Craig, Jehle
Loren Ellarson, John Benz
Vawter $ Walter, Inc. - Marshall Winders, Mike Short
Modern Piping - Dave Brown
Shay Electric - William VanDuyn
The meeting was called to order at 3:35 PM by Lynda Ostedgaard.
Loren Ellarson, Contract Administrator for Hansen Lind Meyer, led the
discussion during the Pre -Construction Conference between the general
contractor, subcontractors, Library Board of Trustees and the architects.
Ellarson presented 24 points relative to the duties and responsibilities
of the general contractor, and his subcontractors, the architects and
the Library Board of Trustees during the construction period. Complete
minutes of this portion of the meeting will be prepared by Ellarson and
will be on file in the Library as an attachment to the minutes of this
meeting.
The minutes of the Regular Board meeting of August 23; and Special
meetings of September 11 and 21 were approved. The disbursements of
September 1 and 15 were approved. Zastrow/Bartley.
Ostedgaard moved and Immermann seconded the adoption of a resolution
to revise the responsibilities and membership of Building Committee N1
and to empower it to serve as the owner's representative at any meeting
or for other purposes in behalf of the Library hoar([. The Committee shall
consist of the Library Director and three Board members selected by the
Board. Any decision by this group must have the concurrence of at least
two of its members in attendance at a meeting or who are consulted in
advance of a decision. This Committee shall be authorized to take action
on behalf of the Library Board in its capacity as owner's representative
but in no event shall it authorize any action which will exceed $25,000
in cost without prior Board approval. Unanimous.
Richerson moved and Zastrow seconded the adoption of the following resolution:
"That the Library Director be authorized to make decisions concerning construc-
tion of the library that involve total cost increases on any one item of no
more than $2500.00" Unanimous.
(over)
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS•DES IdoillES
J
MINUTES
ICPL Board 9-27-79
Page 2
A resolution authorizing the Board President to sign a contract with Te1Com
Systems, Inc. for telephone equipment in the new library was approved.
Immermann/Ostedgaard. Unanimous.
The Board reviewed the draft of goals and objectives for FY1981 and gave
tentative approval pending a full budget draft in October.
The purchase of two Panasonic Omnivision II NV -8170 1/2" video cassette
players from the Gifts and Bequests Fund for $2200 was approved.
Immermann/Richerson. Unanimous. These players will be used to meet
requests of library users and to allow the library to begin purchasing
and circulating this Format. Ilalf-inch video cassettes are highly repre-
sented by subjects the library wishes to get under the $16,000 LSCA audio-
visual grant, and by entertainment films. There is a strong possibility
that this more convenient format eventually can replace 8mm films and the
library needs to get experience using it. One player would be used for
in-house needs and to train borrowers; the other would be loaned.
A proposal to revise reimbursement rates for expenses incurred by library
trustees, employees or agents while using private vehicles for library
business from 15¢ to 18¢ permile effective immediately and from 18¢ to 20¢
permile effective July 1, 1980 was adopted. Richerson/Hyman. Unanimous.
Director's Report: 1) Will have graphics contract and a review of Board's
policy on circulation records on the agenda of the October meeting. 2)
Reported the City Manager's concern over use of the Storyhour Room as a
general meeting room because of its lack of a second exit. 3) Work on the
lease with Ilawkeye CableVision has moved slowly because of figures needed
from IILM regarding utilities and cost of electrical wiring. q) have asked
City Human Relations Director Pat Brown to draw up a list of key personnel
functions so that an agreement between city staff and library can be reached
on who is responsible for each aspect of library personnel matters. 5) The
circulation system is ready to begin Monday, October 1. Over 95% of the
collection has been entered. The staff has received many hours of training
and is ready to operate the new system. A few people from the temporary con-
version staff will be working into October to clean up areas not completed.
6) Shive-Hattery will be hired as the testing agency for the augercast piling,
concrete and earth compaction tests. 7) the City will purchase and the
project will pay for the all-risk property insurance and liability insurance
required by the contract.
President's Report: Bezanson appointed himself and Board members Zastrow and
Ostedgaard to serve on the newly constituted Building Committee N1. Gritsch
will serve as the Board's Collective Bargaining Representative at strategy
sessions with the City Council. Bartley, Chairperson of Building Committee
a3, urged each Board member to review the list of prospective donors and con-
tact her soon about persons they wish to contact. Eggers is preparing a de-
tailed list of gift ideas. A general orientation session on the goals of the
private funds drive will he held before contacts begin.
Meeting adjourned at 6:15 PM.
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES NOIRES
a
I
RESOLUTION N0. 79-494
RESOLUTION OF APPROVAL OF CLASSC SUNDAY
PERMIT APPLICATION
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF IOWA CITY, IOWA,
that a Class C Sunday Permit application is
hereby approved for the following named person or persons at
the following described location:
ASK Co., dba Felix and Oscars, 5 South Dubuque Street
Said approval shall be subject to any conditions or restrictions
hereafter imposed by ordinance of state law.
The City Clerk shall cause a recommendation for approval to
be endorsed upon the application and forward the same together
with the license fee, bond, and all other information or docu- 1
ments required to the Iowa Beer and Liquor Control Department.
It was moved by Balmer and seconded by Erdahl
that the Resolution aT read be adopted, and upon roll call there
were:
AYES: NAYS:
Balmer X
deProsse X
Erdahl X
Neuhauser X
Perret
Roberts X
Vevera X
Passed and approved this 16th
19_:7-9,
Attest:
ity Clerk
Mayor
ABSENT:
X
day of October ,
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES
/M?
�G
J RESOLUTION NO. 79-493
RESOLUTION APPROVING CLASS
LIQUOR CONTROL LICENSE APPLrCitTT(fA
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF IOWA CITY, IOWA,
that a Class -C Liquor Control License application
is hereby approfor the following named person or
persons at the following described location:
ASK Co., dba Felix and Oscars, 5 South Dubuque Street
Said approval shall be subject to any conditions or re-
strictions hereafter imposed by ordinance or State law.
The City Clerk shall cause a recommendation for approval
to he endorsed upon the application and forward the same
together with the license fee, certificate of financial
responsibility, surety bond, sketch of the premises and all
other information or documents required to the Iowa Beer
and Liquor Control Department.
It was moved by Balmer and seconded by Erdahl
that the Resolution as read be adopted, and upon toTI call
there were:
AYES: NAYS: ABSENT:
Balmer x,
deProsse X
Erdahl X
Neuhauser X.
Perret X
Roberts X
Vevera X
Passed and approved this 16th day of October , 19 79
Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOINES
I
M 11
of 7R4
+`�a�s0
CHW
G �°
/owA
i District 6 Office
430 16th Ave. S.W.
Cedar Rapids, IA 52404
Phone: (319) 364-0235
RtCEII'!_Li OCT 5 1919
Aoff V4~ ty, &6eoga& �,
The Honorable Robert A. Vevera
Mayor of Iowa City
City Hall
Iowa City, IA 52240
Dear Mayor Vevara:
RE: I-80 Liahtina Conversion
HIGHWAY DIVISION
October 4, 1979
Johnson County
REF. No. I-80-6 (81) 246--01-52
79-M-148
This is official notification to your City Council that the Iowa
Department of Transportation proposes to let a lighting conversion
project on Primary Road No. I-80 through the Cities of Coralville
and Iowa City on November 6, 1979. A part of said project lies
sodium.
within the City of Iowa City and is located at the Dubuque Street
Interchange. The existing lights will be converted to high pressure
The work will be done in accord with the current Form 810034 "Agree-
ment for Primary Road Extension Maintenance and Operation". Pro-
ject costs will be paid from the Primary Road Fund and no charges
will be made against the City.
The neer project is proposed for construction during 1979. Resident
35118818,WwillaadviselYourofhthe conof tractor'sopr telephone number
the information is available. Proposed schedule when
We would appreciate this project notification being included on your
next City Council meeting agenda as a matter of information to the
Council members.
I If you have any questions concerning
this Office as soon as possible in the work involved, please contact
changes. order to expidite any possible
Yours ry truly,
i
Robert C. Henely
RCH:cmf District Engineer
cc Ed Fawkes
Office Of Development Support William E. Zitterich
Iowa DOT, Ames, IA 50010Iowa Cit
COMMISSIONERS Y RME, Iowa DOT
JUIES M. BUSKER BARBARA OUNN DONALD K. OAgDNER WILLIAM F. MCOggTH ROBERT RIG City, IA 52240
5faux SM. Cid Ose MA DU
Cemr RAplps Melrwe New Hemplpn ALLAN Dubuque
BRUCESe VAN GRUFF
DuOupue Rep Oak
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS - DES MOINES
j
I
i
r
of 7R4
+`�a�s0
CHW
G �°
/owA
i District 6 Office
430 16th Ave. S.W.
Cedar Rapids, IA 52404
Phone: (319) 364-0235
RtCEII'!_Li OCT 5 1919
Aoff V4~ ty, &6eoga& �,
The Honorable Robert A. Vevera
Mayor of Iowa City
City Hall
Iowa City, IA 52240
Dear Mayor Vevara:
RE: I-80 Liahtina Conversion
HIGHWAY DIVISION
October 4, 1979
Johnson County
REF. No. I-80-6 (81) 246--01-52
79-M-148
This is official notification to your City Council that the Iowa
Department of Transportation proposes to let a lighting conversion
project on Primary Road No. I-80 through the Cities of Coralville
and Iowa City on November 6, 1979. A part of said project lies
sodium.
within the City of Iowa City and is located at the Dubuque Street
Interchange. The existing lights will be converted to high pressure
The work will be done in accord with the current Form 810034 "Agree-
ment for Primary Road Extension Maintenance and Operation". Pro-
ject costs will be paid from the Primary Road Fund and no charges
will be made against the City.
The neer project is proposed for construction during 1979. Resident
35118818,WwillaadviselYourofhthe conof tractor'sopr telephone number
the information is available. Proposed schedule when
We would appreciate this project notification being included on your
next City Council meeting agenda as a matter of information to the
Council members.
I If you have any questions concerning
this Office as soon as possible in the work involved, please contact
changes. order to expidite any possible
Yours ry truly,
i
Robert C. Henely
RCH:cmf District Engineer
cc Ed Fawkes
Office Of Development Support William E. Zitterich
Iowa DOT, Ames, IA 50010Iowa Cit
COMMISSIONERS Y RME, Iowa DOT
JUIES M. BUSKER BARBARA OUNN DONALD K. OAgDNER WILLIAM F. MCOggTH ROBERT RIG City, IA 52240
5faux SM. Cid Ose MA DU
Cemr RAplps Melrwe New Hemplpn ALLAN Dubuque
BRUCESe VAN GRUFF
DuOupue Rep Oak
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS - DES MOINES
October 12, 1979
Richard D. Phipps- Chairman
Iowa City Municipal Airport Comm.
825 Normandy Drive
Iowa City, Iowa 52240
Iowa City Council
Civic Center
Iowa City, Iowa 52240
RE: Airport budget
Dear Council Members:
The Iowa City Airport Commission is in need of additional.funding for
fiscal year 1979-80- in the amount of $20,000.
This amount is needed for management, transportation, shop set-up etc.
I would like a meeting with the Council at your earliest convenience
to discuss this matter.
FOCT 12 1979
L
ABBIE STOLFU:•
CITY CLERK
Respectfully,
A'k
Richard D. Phipps
Chairman: Iowa City Municipal
Airport Commission
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 1401NES
i
i
i
I
i
I
i
J
1
I�
I
L.
I;
r:
I
c
,
I
s
I
j
October 12, 1979
Richard D. Phipps- Chairman
Iowa City Municipal Airport Comm.
825 Normandy Drive
Iowa City, Iowa 52240
Iowa City Council
Civic Center
Iowa City, Iowa 52240
RE: Airport budget
Dear Council Members:
The Iowa City Airport Commission is in need of additional.funding for
fiscal year 1979-80- in the amount of $20,000.
This amount is needed for management, transportation, shop set-up etc.
I would like a meeting with the Council at your earliest convenience
to discuss this matter.
FOCT 12 1979
L
ABBIE STOLFU:•
CITY CLERK
Respectfully,
A'k
Richard D. Phipps
Chairman: Iowa City Municipal
Airport Commission
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 1401NES
CITY OF
IOWA CITY
CIVIC CE(\]IER 410
E. WASHINGTON ST IOWA CITY IOVVA 52240 (319) 35z! 15C�'
October 19, 1979
Mr. Richard D. Phipps, Chairman
Iowa City Municipal Airport Commission
825 Normandy Drive
Iowa City, IA 52240
Dear Dick:
The City Council formally accepted your letter requesting additional
funding at its regular meeting on October 16, 1979. It was agreed by
Council members that your request should be discussed at a future informal
Council meeting and that more specific information regarding that request
should be supplied by you prior to that discussion.
I ask that you submit to us a more detailed request to include the
nature and extent of your present funding deficit, specific purposes for
which
tives
mayexist togadditionallfunding, and perceivedx
xconsequences int
the aevent
that additional funding is not available. This is the same general
information we would require of any City department before considering a
substantial budget amendment.
I The Council will be happy to consider your request after having received
and reviewed the above information. You will be notified when the
Council is scheduled to discuss your request at an informal session.
This will occur on a Monday afternoon and all Commission members are
iinvited to attend.
Your prompt attention regarding this matter will facilitate our consi-
deration of your request.
Sinc ly yours,
Robert A. Vevera
Mayor
cc: City Manager
Finance Directo
City Clerk
bc3/14
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 11011JES
f�
ZON
Downtown Iowa City
't
October 16, 1979
To Mayor Vevera and Iowa City City Council:
The Downtown Association wishes to express its concern with
the negative response expressed by some of the council re-
garding a recent proposal from Zuchelli & Associates. This
proposal called for a major department store associated with
a downtown hotel.
While we neither-agree.or disagree with any individual pro-
posal, we feel that conceptually, the addition of another
major, department store could be a definite benefit to the
economic well-being of the community. Iowa City's position
in competition with surrounding cities is very definitely
affected by the variety, size and number of business outlets
in the downtown area. At one time we enjoyed 4 major depart
-ment stores - Penneys, Sears,.Younkers, and Wards. The addition
of a%3rd department store associated with a hotel on the -
Penney,s.lot would still be less than the four we once had
The Downtown Association would urge you to reconsider your
initial reaction to this 'proposal.
This resolution was passed unanimously by the Downtown
Association Hoard of Directors which includes small businesses
as well as major department stores.
Sincerely,
CL_
'.A• ca. ow, Presiden
D OWN ASSOCIATION
RAB/hs
Affiliated with the Iowa City Chamber of Commerce
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CCOAR RAPIDS-DLs !10111CS
/ 95 at
I
SSP• • 79-2.r.
c•1Da1'.LL'�: Ly.'•^';:i:�. A e Bull
Date;. CYetoher 2, 1979
I . rvl•rl> 'r1i:
lx.sk v: ntL- the ec3dition- u2 the in lore^. C. 1ty is proof "
ine:'cect' _ elEorc__cnt D- ..^. L`.' rzz*iCl oedineaces, ead,
TIMER %.S: i•�a ca_cit uns ':'CLp_e-:a_led we_e as _xonrle^ce; cni a h aerd
to t2 e ci:_,... a ;rho asst zu.z "La sida:..lirs, zcp.r W.ly in the
j vali trr, .led aseca c7.osc Co csu:pi s oa Lhe Rant side.
TL +rr,CFu ru _z RrssvLD TiiP_2 'r'HE Ul'SlE, V_ --d tha C=TY U77LAi Ot7S and
EOUSiI;r, cOrm. 2--te^ C0,11 on the 101•7A CZT"�. COMIUL
CO LaiO CC•,9Y IULSLr :C, le.'-.t'?Ld the 5R6V:ELr10t7AL OtllIHLi6•^.LS.
E
'I
I � i
I
I
/9S3
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
i CEDAR RAPIDS -DES IIOIIIES
RETAKE OF PRECEDING DOCUMENT
•
JORM MICROLAB
TARGET SERIES
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CCOAR RAPIDS•0ES IJo IRES
n
i BEST
DOCUMENT
AVAILABLE
SSP.•J9-�:�
SL]i9i Sa^- by i�4ti;C_ ';C 7!Lll
.1: Lac„ _: c a?. cr3iucrce
Date: Octoter 2, 1979
LIJr'p sAS: L c3.-.tc_ Zbe Z:,nditiens e1 tk..0 Sa 'S.vc .: C. in %on^. city is pr00E
"i�IC Le.. L':i.'iv Cl Oi: C._ �� 0_ 0 _ci:L•Ti£� 0:d.incucazy and,
i?dEit,:4: i5:e mz; _!ct p_e-:ail=c cie a sa _.on�rle^ee; c:Z a he and
�0 i:hC Cit J.^.:;f3 ;to mutt : C nce SiLC:::111:5� ^_Cp^;-dully is the
Wall teat 3 c : urano C:1.030 to ca:pns on the A,ast sir
"Tr.TCOi.gv . 4 3i!s*. D ?iiAi TnE GELS°, e.^d tha CITY 7;.E7.AZONS End
�DGSZI7G'ccr .t eac ,',a:eot ct37 on the i0v7A CZ?Y COffdCYL
to ea:o_ce; or mud:Lr cutea S$0•v.'Lt70
P7ALRll
OTidLhCE5:
f - ;
a .
,
I.
� 9S3
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -OLS MOJRCS
.CIT
Y OF
CIVIC CENTER 410 E. WASHINGTON ST
IOWA
CITY
IOWA CITY, IOWA 52240 (319) 354.180D
TO THE PROPERTY BY THE CITY OF IOWA CITY
NAME: F(At, Ro iL sl, c1�
ACCOUNT Y:
ADDRESS: I I 1119
C.
A hearing will be held on
Slyd I
9 at �( _aa,m,40a on the assessment of w{n
City of Iowa City to the property located at w'-sk I due to
o g costs by the
the failure of the person in chargoe rol grasses
to mow or otherwise cont
and weeds. Said amount is $ S
'�, and includes
3.00 charge for
administrative costs. The service are credited afirst when Payment
is received.
You may forward payment of the above amount to the City Treasurer in the
Department of Finance in the Civic Center, 410 E. Washington Street, Iowa
City, Iowa, OR appear before the City Council at the above mentioned time,
antOpportunity to respond Purpose
presente evidence and argumso that al I entson allissues
involved, sues
If you do not appear, or payment of the delinquent
amunt is not recei
costs will be assessed to the property following the scheduled hearing,eas ,
authorized by City Ordinance M78-2916.
If you have any questions regarding this hearing, please contact me at
354-1800, extension 242.
i Sincerely,
Billie Hauber
Weed Official
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 1101nEs
CITY OF
CIVIC CENTER 410 E. WASHINGTON ST
OWA CITY
IOWA CITY IOWA 52240 - (319) 35-.1300
70 THE PROPERTY BY THE CITY OF IOWA CITY
NAME: $a�a�. l3y«.. �Ac ACCOUNT /:
ADDRESS: Mlq 30 W CL.cc_,I„ (Z,,, ,
C1A%CnC) MIIAOta
A hearing will be held on M�__� zc�Ii �4+iq
19-4- at —`L s�Oa•e•/� on thelassessment of mowing costs by the
City of Iowa City to the property located at 211 5 F i. ,.�
the failure of the person in charge toue to
mow or otherwise control grasses
and weds. Said amount is ;
administrative costs. The service charges are d includes acharge
are creditedf first when payment
is received.
You may forward payment of the above amount to the City Treasurer in the
Department of Finance in the Civic Center, 410 E. Washington Street, Iowa
City, Iowa, OR appear before the City Council at the above mentioned time,
date and place for the purpose of a hearing so that all parties shall have
an opportunity to respond and present evidence and arguments on all issues
involved.
If you do not appear, or payment of the delinquent amount is not received,
costs will be assessed to the property following the scheduled hearing, as
authorized by City Ordinance 178-2916,
If you have any questions regarding this hearing, please contact me at
354-1800, extension 242.
Sincerely,
Billie Hauber
Weed Official
MICROMMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES
j
CITY OF IOWA C ITY
CIVIC CENFER • 410 E. WASHINGTON ST IOWA CITY IOWA 52240 (319) 354.18GO
j October 16, 1979
i
i
i
To the Honorable Mayor and City Council of Iowa City, Iowa:
i
I am submitting herewith a list of the delinquent weed control charges;
I a description of the premises where such delinquent accounts were
I incurred; together with the name of the owner thereof, for certification
to the County Auditor to be collected as regular taxes as by statute
j provided.
A copy of the list is also submitted with a resolution attached, pre-
pared for passage, directing certification to the County Auditor.
�r
j Respectfully submitted,
� e .�.J
Superintendent Cemetery Forestry
FIICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES IdOINES
IIS7
..
�i
j RESOLUTION NO. 79-496
is
RESOLUTION CERTIFYING DELINQUENT WEED CONTROL CHARGES TO COUNTY
AUDITOR.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF IOWA CITY, IOWA,
that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to certify the if
attached delinquent weed control costs to the County Auditor for
collection as regular taxes as by statute provided.
i
It was moved by deProsse and seconded by Roberts
i the Resolution be adopted, and upon roll call there were:
AYES: NAYS: ABSENT:
i,
X Balmer
X deProsse
X Erdahl
X Neuhauser
X Perret
Roberts
X Vevera
Passed and approved this 16th Day of October, 1979. I`
I
YO
ATTEST:
4cm
is
3;
a:
i?
I
IiI
l;
Received & Approvod
By The Legal Department
9> 24- 14 AA
FIICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAP. RAPIDS -DES MOINES
j
i
i
1
i'
i
i
f
J'
n
r
I
1
�
I
it
I
f
I
t'
{
.t .
Delinquent Acct: Sarah Byron McDaniel, 21_ 5 ErCourr; `�a City, Iowa A
Owner: Sarah-or-By-ro niel Rm-1439 30 W. Chicago Ave„ Chicago, I11, 60610
Description-: _West -half o Lot 1 in BIack-20-in-East Iowa-in
Amount-;-'$30,00 �\ g .tee• t
Delinquent Acct: Adli Roushdi, Undeveloped lot west of 528 Washington St, Iowa City,
Owner:.. Adli Roushdi, 1119 Woodlark In. N.W. Cedar Rapids, Iowa 52402
Description: Beginning at the S.E. corner Lot 7 Block 40 Original town of Iowa City
Iowa; thence North 0"01 West along the East line of Said Lot 7 140,83 feet to the
South Line of the CRI and PRR Rroperty; thence South 560 35' West 44,87 feet to a point
of curvature; thence South Westerly along a 788,51' Radius Curve concave South Easterly
159,32 feet to the West Line of Lot 6 Block 40; thence South 0'03' East 15,40 feet to
the South West corner of Said Lot 6; thence South 8956' East 160,80 feet to the point
of beginning,
35.00 e .•-s i° �` r
Amount: $ � � ��� ,�. ,c�va�C�C.os 1s. �
. i
i
I
/'BEST
mcUMENT
AVAILABLE
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS•DES IIOIMES
i
t
J'
r
I
it
I
t'
{
.t .
Delinquent Acct: Sarah Byron McDaniel, 21_ 5 ErCourr; `�a City, Iowa A
Owner: Sarah-or-By-ro niel Rm-1439 30 W. Chicago Ave„ Chicago, I11, 60610
Description-: _West -half o Lot 1 in BIack-20-in-East Iowa-in
Amount-;-'$30,00 �\ g .tee• t
Delinquent Acct: Adli Roushdi, Undeveloped lot west of 528 Washington St, Iowa City,
Owner:.. Adli Roushdi, 1119 Woodlark In. N.W. Cedar Rapids, Iowa 52402
Description: Beginning at the S.E. corner Lot 7 Block 40 Original town of Iowa City
Iowa; thence North 0"01 West along the East line of Said Lot 7 140,83 feet to the
South Line of the CRI and PRR Rroperty; thence South 560 35' West 44,87 feet to a point
of curvature; thence South Westerly along a 788,51' Radius Curve concave South Easterly
159,32 feet to the West Line of Lot 6 Block 40; thence South 0'03' East 15,40 feet to
the South West corner of Said Lot 6; thence South 8956' East 160,80 feet to the point
of beginning,
35.00 e .•-s i° �` r
Amount: $ � � ��� ,�. ,c�va�C�C.os 1s. �
. i
i
I
/'BEST
mcUMENT
AVAILABLE
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS•DES IIOIMES
i
Delinquent Acct: Sarah Byron McDaniel, 21_ 5 ErCourr; `�a City, Iowa A
Owner: Sarah-or-By-ro niel Rm-1439 30 W. Chicago Ave„ Chicago, I11, 60610
Description-: _West -half o Lot 1 in BIack-20-in-East Iowa-in
Amount-;-'$30,00 �\ g .tee• t
Delinquent Acct: Adli Roushdi, Undeveloped lot west of 528 Washington St, Iowa City,
Owner:.. Adli Roushdi, 1119 Woodlark In. N.W. Cedar Rapids, Iowa 52402
Description: Beginning at the S.E. corner Lot 7 Block 40 Original town of Iowa City
Iowa; thence North 0"01 West along the East line of Said Lot 7 140,83 feet to the
South Line of the CRI and PRR Rroperty; thence South 560 35' West 44,87 feet to a point
of curvature; thence South Westerly along a 788,51' Radius Curve concave South Easterly
159,32 feet to the West Line of Lot 6 Block 40; thence South 0'03' East 15,40 feet to
the South West corner of Said Lot 6; thence South 8956' East 160,80 feet to the point
of beginning,
35.00 e .•-s i° �` r
Amount: $ � � ��� ,�. ,c�va�C�C.os 1s. �
. i
i
I
/'BEST
mcUMENT
AVAILABLE
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS•DES IIOIMES
CITY OF IOWA CIT i
CIVIC CENTER 410 E. WASHINGTON ST ION/A CITY IOWA 52240 (319) 35a.180D I
NOTICE OF HEARING ON THE ASSESSMENT OF THE COSTS OF WEED/GRASS CONTROL
TO THE PROPERTY BY THE CITY OF IOWA CITY
NAME: S(rd1n v lay «,% ML 0av\, e.I ACCOUNT N:
ADDRESS: Roc r k4-Aq '10 Ul. LIn.cC_,Io Caw..
Lro. Ili u<ais (.0(. 10
A hearing will be held on T%k0gA ,A -, �_,
19 ', at 30a.m./(O. on thelassessment of mowing costs by the
City of Iowa City to the property located at 21%5 E ('C)�<-i , due to
the failure of the person in charge to mow or otherwise control grasses
and weeds. Said amount is $'
�_, and includes a $3.00 charge for
administrative costs. The service charges are credited first when payment
is received.
You may forward payment of the above amount to the City Treasurer in the
Department of Finance in the Civic Center, 410 E. Washington Street, Iowa
City, Iowa, OR appear before the City Council at the above mentioned time,
date and place for the purpose of a hearing so that all parties shall have
an opportunity to respond and present evidence and arguments on all issues
involved.
If you do not appear, or payment of the delinquent amount is not received,
costs will be assessed to the property following the scheduled hearing, as
authorized by City Ordinance #78-2916.
If you have any questions regarding this hearing, please contact me at
354-1800, extension 242.
Sincerely,
Billie Hauber
Weed Official
i
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES ?101 NES
I
NOTICE
THE CITY COUNCIL OF IOWA CITY
IS CONSIDERING APPOINTMENTS
TO THE FOLLOWING BOARD:
90ARD_OF APPEALS
One vacancy - Unexpired term
October 23, 1979 - December 31, 1980
Two vacancies - Three-year terms
November 27, 1979 - December 31, 1982
It is the duty of members of the Board of Appeals
to hold appeal hearings on matters concerning the
uniform building code. Members must be qualified
by experience and training to pass upon matters
pertaining to building construction.
Iowa City appointed members of boards and commis-
sions must be qualified electors of the City of
Iowa City.
The appointment to this Board for the unexpired
term will be made on October 23, 1979, at the
Council meeting at 7:30 P.M. in the Council Chamb-
ers. The appointments for the three-year terms
will be made at the November 27, 1979, meeting of
the City Council. The actual terms will begin on
December 31, 1979. This will allow the appointees
an opportunity to attend meetings of the Board of
Appeals in order to become familiar with the
duties before assuming full responsibilities.
Persons interested in being considered for these
Positions should contact the City Clerk, Civic
Center, 410 East Washington. Application forms
are available from the Clerk's office upon request.
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOINES
115r
RESOLUTION NO. 79-497 _
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING 771E MAYOR TO SIfN AND THE CITY CLERK TO ATTEST
A RELEASE OF A SANITARY SEWER EASERLMIr ON (AT 4 OF EASTUALB MALL,
Eastdale
the
by City of Iowa City was granted a sanitary sewer easement
by Eastdale Corporation on November 16, 1976, a portion of which lies
on Lot 4 of F:aStdale Mall; and
WHEREAS, Eastdale Corporation now desire:; to relocate the portion of
the sewer easement on Lot 4 of Eastdale Mall; and
WHEREAS, Eastdale Corporation has granted the City of Iowa City a new
sanitary sewer easrment on said Lot 4.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF IOWA
CITY:
1• That the Mayor be authorized to sign and the City Clerk to at-
test an agreement with Eastdale Corporation which releases and
abandons that portion of a sanitary sewer easement on Lot 14
of Eastdale Mall.
It was moved by galmrr and seconded by Roberts
that the Resolution as read be adopted, and upon roll call there were:
AYES: NAYES: ABSENT:
- x — Balmer
x - deProsse
x Erdahl
x Neuhauser
x Perret
- Roberts
Vevera
Passed and approved this 16th day of October
uo�PORATE SEAQ
ATTEST: �� `
City Clerk
412
t_jr -
Mayor
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOVIES
FILED : X4144
BOOK, (iE:YLK
191 OCT22 nn 9:24,
RecoliDER
JOHNSON CO„ IOIYA
1979.
I
i
I
'
�
I
I
I
i..
I
I
_I
1
I
g
i
i
_1.
�I
i
I
I
j
1.
I
f
�
I
I
I
i
i
i
RESOLUTION NO. 79-497 _
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING 771E MAYOR TO SIfN AND THE CITY CLERK TO ATTEST
A RELEASE OF A SANITARY SEWER EASERLMIr ON (AT 4 OF EASTUALB MALL,
Eastdale
the
by City of Iowa City was granted a sanitary sewer easement
by Eastdale Corporation on November 16, 1976, a portion of which lies
on Lot 4 of F:aStdale Mall; and
WHEREAS, Eastdale Corporation now desire:; to relocate the portion of
the sewer easement on Lot 4 of Eastdale Mall; and
WHEREAS, Eastdale Corporation has granted the City of Iowa City a new
sanitary sewer easrment on said Lot 4.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF IOWA
CITY:
1• That the Mayor be authorized to sign and the City Clerk to at-
test an agreement with Eastdale Corporation which releases and
abandons that portion of a sanitary sewer easement on Lot 14
of Eastdale Mall.
It was moved by galmrr and seconded by Roberts
that the Resolution as read be adopted, and upon roll call there were:
AYES: NAYES: ABSENT:
- x — Balmer
x - deProsse
x Erdahl
x Neuhauser
x Perret
- Roberts
Vevera
Passed and approved this 16th day of October
uo�PORATE SEAQ
ATTEST: �� `
City Clerk
412
t_jr -
Mayor
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOVIES
FILED : X4144
BOOK, (iE:YLK
191 OCT22 nn 9:24,
RecoliDER
JOHNSON CO„ IOIYA
1979.
Passed and approved this 16th day of October , 1979.
{ i Mayor
ATTEST: i
!' City Clerk
1
1 �
{
{
RESOLUTION N0. 79-497
i.
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO SIGN AND THE CITY CLERK TO ATTEST
A RELEASE OF A SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT ON LOT 4 OF EASTDALE MALL.
a
WHEREAS, the City of Iowa City was granted a sanitary sewer easement
I
:J
by Eastdale Corporation on November 16, 1976, a portion of which lies
j
on Lot 4 of Eastdale Mall; and
WHEREAS, Eastdale Corporation now desires to relocate the portion of
the sewer easement on Lot 4 of Eastdale Mall; and
i
WHEREAS, Eastdale Corporation has granted the City of Iowa City a new
sanitary sewer easement on said Lot 4.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF IOWA
..
CITY:
1. That the Mayor be authorized to sign and the City Clerk to at-
test an agreement with Eastdale Corporation which releases and
abandons that portion of a sanitary sewer easement on Lot 14
of Eastdale Mall.
-
It was moved by Balmer and seconded by Roberts
that the Resolution as read be adopted, and upon roll call there were:
�.:
...I
AYES: NAPES: ABSENT:
}
X Balmer
X deProsse
X Erdahl
1
V Neuhauser
{
..
X_ Perret
Roberts
f 7
—•X
X Vevera
Passed and approved this 16th day of October , 1979.
{ i Mayor
ATTEST: i
!' City Clerk
1
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES
7
RECEIVED R APPROVED
ll3L Q'P.E LEGAiJ UPAR'TMT,
l96 3
{
{
,
a
_
I
:J
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES
7
RECEIVED R APPROVED
ll3L Q'P.E LEGAiJ UPAR'TMT,
l96 3
■
i
RELEASE OF EASEMENT
Agreement made this 2nd day of October 1979 between
Eastdale Corp., an Iowa corporation and the City of Iowa City,
Iowa witnesseth:
Whereas, on the 16th day of November •1976 Eastdale Corp.
granted to the City of Iowa City an easement for a sanitary sewer
system recorded in the Johnson County Recorders Office in Book 478
page 309 and described as follows:
A 10 foot wide easement, the centerline of which is
described as commencing at the SE corner of Section 14,
T79N, R6W of the 5th P.M.; thence :forth 310.74 feet
along the east line of Lot 2 Ohls Subdivision, Iowa City,
Johnson County, Iowa, to the point of beginning; thence
S 68 57 40 W, 490.70 feet to the terminal point.
Now, therefore, in consideration of the payment of one dollar
(1.00) paid by Eastdale Corp. to the City of Iowa City the receipt
whereof is hereby acknowledged, the City of Iowa City hereby
releases and abandons to Eastdale Corp. that portion of the easement
above described which lies on Lot 4 of Eastdale Mall, with the
intention of termination said easement.
BEST .
AVAILABLE
Maeri4VI�_
i
Attest
• N�
City C er•
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 1401IIES
j.
I
(
j
i
RELEASE OF EASEMENT
Agreement made this 2nd day of October 1979 between
Eastdale Corp., an Iowa corporation and the City of Iowa City,
Iowa witnesseth:
Whereas, on the 16th day of November •1976 Eastdale Corp.
granted to the City of Iowa City an easement for a sanitary sewer
system recorded in the Johnson County Recorders Office in Book 478
page 309 and described as follows:
A 10 foot wide easement, the centerline of which is
described as commencing at the SE corner of Section 14,
T79N, R6W of the 5th P.M.; thence :forth 310.74 feet
along the east line of Lot 2 Ohls Subdivision, Iowa City,
Johnson County, Iowa, to the point of beginning; thence
S 68 57 40 W, 490.70 feet to the terminal point.
Now, therefore, in consideration of the payment of one dollar
(1.00) paid by Eastdale Corp. to the City of Iowa City the receipt
whereof is hereby acknowledged, the City of Iowa City hereby
releases and abandons to Eastdale Corp. that portion of the easement
above described which lies on Lot 4 of Eastdale Mall, with the
intention of termination said easement.
BEST .
AVAILABLE
Maeri4VI�_
i
Attest
• N�
City C er•
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 1401IIES
E
Crnnwrs rescrvc! Iho right Lo otic s:Iid strips for purposes which
will not inlcrf,•rc wiLh Che City's full enjoyment of the rights
hereby granted; provided Lhat grantors shall not erect or con-
struct any building or structure, or drill and operate any well,
or construct r,ny reservoir or oLher obstruction of said arca, or
diminish or substantially add to the ground cover over said pipe
lines.
Cranlors do hereby covenant with City that they 11-c lawfulI seized
and possessed of the real estate above described; that Choy have
a good and lawful right to convey it, or any part thereof.
The provisions hereof shall insure to the benefit of and bind the
successors and assigns of the respective parties hereto, and all
covenants shall apply to and run with the land.
Dated this a?A149 day of o(fg6W A.D.,
O
oma s ar ee
Eastdale CorDnration
BY: VLAG.",,Ir // /moi/ it
Ronald S. Harding
Merrell M. Johnsoy! RUZ100AX
i
STATE OF IOb'A )
ss:
COUNTY OF JOHNSON )
si this day of in i C before sme,aid the
i undersigned, a otary Public in an or said`—Co-unty, in said
State, personally appeared ( D.. to me personally
known, who being by me duly sworn, execute Me' within and fore-
going instrument to which this is attached, and acknowledged the
execution of said instrument to be his voluntary act and deed.
XIANK C. SLADEK
l MY W I%N EXPIRES
3 Notary public in and for
Johnson County, Iowa
STATE OF IOWA )
ss:
COUNTY OF JOHNSON )
On this a N day of Pic /qai , before me, the
undersigned, a otar Pub is in an - or"s-a`i3'County, in said State,
personally appeared ugto•`, H„ �/N4 � to me personnally known,
whoand, being by me duly sworn, i say that they are the S
PResl'Deair to which this is attached; that sai-'min=�
strument was signs on behalf of said corpora 'on by aut ori
of its Board of Directors; and that the said Na 01
as such officers acknowledged the execution o sal instrument to
be the voluntary act and deed of said corporation, by it and by
them voluntarily executed.
Notary blic in and for
Jongso County, Iowa:
MY eoenrmt6s1om empSS 9�30�80
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 110111ES
M
.'ER
�
This agreomrnt, m e and entered into by and etween Eastdale
Mall, Inc., and Thomas C. Barbee, grantors, which expression
shall include agents or assigns, and the City of Iowa City,
Iowa, hereinafter referred to as City, which expression shall
include their agents or assigns, witnessth:
It is hereby agreed as follows:
For the sum of $1.00 plus other valuable consideration, the
receipof which is hereby acknowledged, grantor hereby grants
and conveys to City an easement for the purposes of replace-
ment, maintenance, and use of sanitary sewer mains as the City
shall from time to time elect for conveying sanitary sewer
with all necessary appliancesand fittings for use in connect-
ion with said pipelines, together with adequate protection
therefore, as described below:
A 10 foot strip of land across Lot 4 of Eastdale Mall Addition,
the centerline being described as:
i
Commencing at the nortwest corner of Lot 4 of Eastdale Mall
Addition; thence S 20 9'40" E, 37.8 feet to the point o
beginning; thence N 68 57'40" E, 22.1 feet; thence S 4945'00 E,
} 75.00 feet; thence N 8030'00" E, 75.00 feet; thence N 68057'40" E,
25.7 feet to the east line of said Lot 4• said point being
S 20059'40" E, 14.8 feet of the northeast corner of said Lot 4.
i
Grantor further grants to City:
1. The right of grading said strip for the full width there-
of and to extend the cuts and fills for such grading into
I and on said lands along an outside of said line to such
an extent as City may find reasonably necessary;
2. The right to support said lines across revines and water-
cources with such structures as City shall from time to
time elect;
3. The right from time to time to trim and cut down and clear
a away any and all trees and brush now or hereafter on said
strip and to trim and to cut down and clear away any trees
on either side of said strip which now or hereafter in the
opinion of the City may be a hazard to said sewer line or
may interfere with the exercise of City's rights hereunder
in any manner; provided, however, that all trees which City
is hereby authorized to cut and remove, if valuable for
timber or wood, shall continue to be the property of grant-
ors, but all tops, lops, brush and refuse wood shall be
burned or removed by City;
4. The right of ingress to and egress from said strips over
and across said lands by means of roads and lanes thereon,
if such there be; otherwise, by such route or routes as shall
j occasion the least practicable damage and inconvenience to
grantors; provided that such right of ingress and egress shall
not extend to any portion of said lands which is isolated
( from said strip by any public road or highway now crossing
( or hereafter crossing said lands;
i
5. The right to mark the location of said strips by suitable
markers set in ground; provided that said markers shall be
placed in fences or other locations which will not interfere
with any reasonable use grantor shall make of said strips.
a) City shall not fence strip;
b) City shall promptly backfill any trench made by it
on said strip and repair any damage it shall do to
grantors' private roads or lanes os said lands.
c) City shall indemnify grantors against any loss and
damage which shall be caused by the exercise of said
ingress and egress, construction, and maintenance
or by any wrongful or negligent act, omission of
City or of its agents or employees in the course
of their employment.
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOIIIES
I
1
t
RSOLUI'ION NO. 79-498
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING REALIGNED SANITARY SEWER
ON LOT 4 EASTDALE MALL
WEIEIOAS, the Engineering Department has certified that the following
improvements have been ompleted in accordance with plans and specifications
of the City of Iowa City,
Sanitary sewer was installed by Knowling Bros. of
Iowa City, Iowa, and was placed in the proposed
easement on Lot 4 Eastdale Mall.
AND WHEREAS, Maintenance Bonds for Knowling Bros. are on
file in the City Clerk's Office,
NOW THEREFORE BE IT IWOLVED by the City Council of Iowa City, Iowa,
that said iaprovenents be accepted by the City of Iowa City.
It was moved by and seconded by Neuhauser
that the Resolution as A�gtRj; , and upon roll call there were:
AYES:
X
X
X
X
NAYS: ABSENT:
X
Passed and approved this 16th day of October , 19 79 .
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Reco-ivod & Approved
By TI o Legal Department
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES M0111ES
CITY OF IOWA CITY
('IVI(: I .I NII P AIO I WA!;I IINI ,I/ IIT I I()WA (.I I Y I( WA ! ::' 11 113N)3), I I(il 0 )
I
ENGINEER'S REPORT
October 10, 1979
Honorable Mayor and City Council
Iowa City
Iowa
Dear Honorable Mayor and Councilpersons:
I hereby certify that the construction of the improvements listed
below have been completed in substantial accordance with the plans
and specifications of the Engineering Division of the City of Iowa
City. The required maintenance bond is on file in the City Clerk's
office.
Realigned sanitary sewer on Lot 4 Eastdale Mall as constructed by
Knowling Brothers Construction of Iowa City, Iowa.
I hereby recommend that the above mentioned improvements be accepted i
by the City of Iowa City.
Respectfully submitted,
Eugene A. Dietz, P.E.
I
City Engineer i
bdw3/9
} j
I
i
i
i
I
MICROFILMED BY
' JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS-DES MOINES
111.
i
I
CZE 4 S X33 5 • IOWA
MAINTENANCE BOND
/(now all men by Miele presents
That KNOWLING BROS. CONTRACTING CO.
of Iowa City, Iowa
as Principal, and the UNITED FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY, AN IOWA CORPORATION
of CEDAR RAPIDS, IOWA, and authorized to do business In the state of Iowa as Surety, are held
and firmly bound unto the CITY OF IOWA CITY IOWA
in the penal sum of THREE THOUSAND, FIVE HUNDRED SEVENTY FIVE AND NO/100------------------
3, 575. 00
------ -3,575.00 ] DOLLARS, lawful money of the United States of America, for the payment of which, well
and truly to be made, the Principal and Surety bind themselves, their and each of their heirs, executors, and
administrators, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents.
Signed and delivered this Ilth day of October A. D. 19 79
with Eastdale Corporation, Iowa City, Iowa
Whereas, the said Principal entered Into a certain contractJdated the 94th day of
i
b
Septemer
— 1979 to furnish all the material and labor necessary for the construction of
Sewer Relocation - Lot 4 Eastdale, Iowa City, Iowa,
I
In conformity with certain specifications; and
Whereas, a further condition of said contract Is that the said Principal should furnish a bond of indemnity,
guaranteein to remedy any defects In workmanship or materials that may develop in said work with a period of
tw years from the date of acceptance of the work under said contract; and
Whereas, the said UNITED FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY, of CEDAR RAPIDS,
IOWA, for a valuable consideration, has agreed to join with said Principal in such bond or guarantee,
indemnifying said CITY OF IOWA CITY. IOWA
as aforesaid;
Now, Therefore, the Condition of This Obligation Is Such, that If the said Principal does and shall, at his own
I cost and expense, remedy any and all defects that may develop In said work, within the period of two (7)
years from the date of acceptance of the work under said contract, by reason of bad workmanship or poor material
used in the construction of said work, and shall keep all work in continuous good repair during said period, and shall
In all other respects, comply with all the terms and conditions of said contract with respect to maintenance and
i repair of said work, then this obligation to be null and void; otherwise to be and remain in full force and virtue In
law,
KNOWLING BROS, CONTRACTING CO, principal
i
9y
UNITED FIRE & CASUALTY CO PANY
/ t
UND-2055-b By ll/C G
Attorne *In -fact and
Iowa f�esident Agent
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MDIIIES
I TA
L„fTED FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY
HOME OFFICE — CEDAR RAPIDS, IOWA
CERTIFIED COPY OF POWER OF ATTORNEY
(Original on file at Home Office of Company — See Certification)
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, That the UNITED FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY,a corporation dulyorganized
and existing under the laws of the State of Iowa, and having its principal office in Cedar Rapids, State of Iowa, does make, con.
stitute and appoint Patricia R. Zahn, or L, Pieratt, Jr., or David F. Freiermuth, or
Theresa Juhl, or Veronica Monaghan, or Lowell Zapf, all individually.
of Waterloo, Iowa
its true and lawful Attorney(s)-in-Fact with power and authority hereby conferred to sign, seal and execute in its behalf all law-
ful bonds, undertakings and other obligatory instruments of similar nature as follows:
--Any And All Bonds --
and to bind UNITED FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY thereby as fully and to the same extent as if such instruments were signed
by the duly authorized officers of UNITED FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY and all the acts of said Attorney, pursuant to the
authority hereby given are hereby ratified and confirmed.
The Authority hereby granted shall expire March 1, 1981 unless sooner revoked.
This power of Attorney is made and executed pursuant to and by authority of the following By -Law duly adopted by the
Board of Directors of the Company on April 18, 1973.
"Article V —Surety Bonds and Undertakings.”
Section 2, Appointment of Altomay-in-Fact. "The President or any Vic, President, or any other ofile., of the Company,
may', from time to time. appoint by written certificates attorneys-in•fact to act in behalf of the Company in the execution of
Policies of Insurance, bonds, undertaking. and other obligatory Instrument, of like nature. The signature of any officer autho-
nted hereby, and the Corporate seal, may be affixed by facatmue to any power of attorney or spacial power of attornerorca.
tilleatlon of either authorised herebyt such signature and seal, when so used, being adopted by the Company as the original
signature of such offleer and the original leaf of the ComPmY. to be valid and binding upon the Company with the "Me force
and effect as though mmuslly rinsed. Such attorneys-In•heq subject to the limitations set forth in their respective c n iflcats
of authority shall have full power to bind the Company by their signature and execution of any such Instruments and to attach
the seal of the Company thereto. The President or any Vice President, the Board of Director, or any other officer of the Com-
pany may at any time revoke aD power and authority previously given to any attorneyAn•f act.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the UNITED FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY has caused these presents
,nIsCASo".,, to be signed by its vice president and its corporate seal to be hereto affixed this is t
�A "
CORPOR4fE`= day of March , A.D. 1979
-� SEAL)gc UNITED(FFIIRjE(A{&C�ASSUUALTYC/O`-MPP]�A
B
State of Iowa, County of Linn, ss: y ice President
On this 1st day of March 1979 , before me personally came Richard J. Ehlinger
to me known, who being by me duly sworn, did depose and say: that he resides in Cedar Rapids, State of Iowa; that he is a Vice
President of the UNITED FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY, the corporation described in and which executed the above instru•
ment; that he knows the seal of said corporation; that the seal affixed to the said instrument is such corporate seal; that it was so
affixed pursuant to authority given by the Board of Directors of said corporation and that he signed his name thereto pursuant
to like authority, and acknowledges same to be the act and deed of said corporation.
1 EA Q. XECRROTN
YI COMMISSIOY. E��"I:ES Notary Public
M tember 30 1 y
My commission expires September 30, 1980
CERTIFICATION
I, the undersigned officer of the UNITED FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY , do hereby certify that I have compared the fore•
going copy of the Power of Attorney and affidavit, and the copy of the Section of the By -Laws of said Company as set forth in
said Power of Attorney, with the ORIGINALS ON FILE IN THE HOME OFFICE OF SAID COMPANY, and that the same are
correct transcripts thereof, and of the whole of the said originals, and that the said Power of Attorney has not been revoked and
is now in full force and effect.
,pdcfuti nno,
In testimony whereof I have hereunto subscribed my name and affixed the corporate seal of the said
�a
c WPPOA4f[\=
s,(seAL P Company this 11th day or October 19 79 ! r I
UNO —MA, 8b 4ssistant Secretary
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS - DES 110111ES
r
CITY OF IOWA CITY
CIVIC CENTER- 410 E. WASHINGTON ST. IOWA CITY IOWA 52240 (319) 354.18010
ENGINEER'S REPORT
October 10, 1979
/94 .
Honorable Mayor and City Council
Iowa City
Iowa
Dear Honorable Mayor and Councilpersons:
I hereby certify that the construction of the improvements listed
below have been completed in substantial accordance with the plans
and specifications of the Engineering Division of the City of Iowa
City. The required maintenance bond is on file in the City Clerk's
office.
Realigned sanitary sewer on Lot 4 Eastdale Mall as constructed by
Knowling Brothers Construction of Iowa City, Iowa.
t
I hereby recommend that the above mentioned improvements be accepted
by the City of Iowa City.
Respectfully submitted,
Eugene A. Dietz, P.E.
I
City Engineer
t
bdw3/9
I
j
1 f'
fr:
I
i
'1
I
MICROFILMEO BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 1401 HES
/94 .
R
RESOLUTION NO. 79-499
RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING JUST COMPENSATION FOR ACQUISITION OF REAL PROPERTY
FOR THE SOUTH BRANCH RALSTON CREEK STORMWATER DETENTION PROJECT
WHEREAS, the City of Iowa City, Iowa, in furtherance of the public welfare,
is undertaking a program to alleviate flooding on Ralston Creek; and,
WHEREAS, the City of Iowa City, as a part of this flood control program, plans
to construct a stormwater detention structure on the South Branch of Ralston Creek;
and,
WHEREAS, this project requires that the City of Iowa City acquire certain
interests in real property; and,
WHEREAS, the City of Iowa City has received appraisals and review appraisals
concerning the fair market value of these real property interests; and,
WHEREAS, the City of Iowa City has reviewed these appraisals and review
appraisals, and being familiar with the real property identified therein, desires
to establish the Just Compensation for acquisition of these real property interests.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF IOWA CITY, IOWA, that
the amounts listed opposite each real property interest described below are hereby
declared to be the Just Compensation for the purpose of acquisition of said real
property interests.
The Staff of the City of Iowa City is hereby authorized to commence negotiations
for the purchase of said real property interests and the Mayor and City Clerk are
authorized to contract for the purchase of said real property interests. In the event
negotiations for purchase are unsuccessful, the Staff is hereby authorized to
institute condemnation proceedings for the acquisition of said real property interests.
Property Owner
Wilfreda A. Hieronymus and
Albert N. Hieronymus
Real Property Interest
Fee title to 35.89 acres from
a tract of land located at
Scott Boulevard and American
Legion Road, and an easement
over 6 acres from said tract
of land.
Just Compensation
$258,000
Plum Grove Acres, Inc.
Fee title to 18.4 acres from
$146,000
a tract of land located at
Scott Boulevard and Court
Street.
John R.
Lindemann and
Flowage easement for flood
$2,000
Geneva
E. Lindemann
control purposes over approx-
imately 3 acres from a tract of
land located in Scott Township.
Gustav
Lindemann and
Flowage easement for flood
$1,300
Lillian
Lindemann
control purposes over approx-
imately 2 acres from a tract
of land located on both sides of
Lower West Branch Road in Scott
Township.
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOVIES
/Us
-Z-
It was moved by HaIMPr and seconded by deProsse
that the Resolution as read be adopted, and upon roll call there were:
AYES: NAYS: ABSENT:
X Balmer
% deProsse
% Erdahl
% Neuhauser
_ X Perrot
% Roberts
% Vevera
Passed and approved this 16th day of October 1978
& 4el_4
Mayor
ATTEST:
ity Cler
RECEIVED & APPROVED
$X TjIE LEGAL DEP T102
- f
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES M0111ES
I
I
i
t
I
i
i
I
�
i
i
1
f..
;
I
i
I
I
I
�
i
I
I
-Z-
It was moved by HaIMPr and seconded by deProsse
that the Resolution as read be adopted, and upon roll call there were:
AYES: NAYS: ABSENT:
X Balmer
% deProsse
% Erdahl
% Neuhauser
_ X Perrot
% Roberts
% Vevera
Passed and approved this 16th day of October 1978
& 4el_4
Mayor
ATTEST:
ity Cler
RECEIVED & APPROVED
$X TjIE LEGAL DEP T102
- f
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES M0111ES
M4
RESOLUTION NO. 79-500
RESOLUTION AUIMRIZING EXECUTION OF CONTRACT
WHEREAS, the City of Iowa City, Iowa, has negotiated a contract with
Ads Advertising a copy of said contract being
attached to this Resolution and by this reference made a part hereof, and
WHEREAS, the City Council deems it in the public interest to enter
into said contract _for one year following satisfactory rmmolp}inn of
a previous advertisers contract. Said contract allows for placement of
up to twenty (20) transit cards for advertising purposes on the inside
of each bus operated by the City's Transit System. Advertising rate is
$42 per month ofwhich the City $2n dyp r,<
$14. r s
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:
1. That the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized and directed
to execute the Agreement with Ads Advertising
2. That the City Clerk shall furnish copies of said Agreement to any
citizen requesting some.
It was moved by Balmer and seconded by Neuhauser
the Resolution be adopted, and upon roil call there were:
AYE S: NAYS: ABSENT•
a X Balmer
X deProsse
qqh Erdahl
4 X Neuhauser
x Perret
X Roberts
X
iVevera
Passed and approved this 16th day of October 19 79
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
RECEIVED k
BY .Th! LEC41; D 61tT1�N7'
MICROFILM
MICROFILMED BY
F JORM MICROLAB
I CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 11011IES
/ j( 6 -
WE
AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE CITY OF IOWA CITY, IOWA
AND
ADS ADVERTISING
THE PARTIES
The parties to this Agreement are the City of Iowa City, Iowa, 410 E.
Washington Street, Iowa City, Iowa (hereinafter referred to as
"City") and ADS Advertising, an advertising business owned by
Lorraine Sinnard, 1804 Sioux, Waterloo, Iowa 50702.
PURPOSE
The purpose of this Agreement is to provide a working document
between the parties for the placement of transit cards for
advertising purposes on the inside of the buses operated by the
City's Transit System.
TRANSIT CARDS
1. The transit cards to be placed in the Iowa City Transit System
buses will be 11" x 17" in size, placed horizontally.
2. Local advertising standards of good taste will apply to all
advertising.
SALES
1. Ads Advertising shall be the sole and exclusive agent for the
City in the promotion, sale, and placement of transit cards into
buses operated by the City's Transit System. (20 buses
currently, but to include 2 additional buses if added).
2. The City will allow Ads Advertising to place up to 20 cards into
each of the buses operated by the City's Transit System.
3. The City shall be permitted to use any advertising spaces on the
buses not used by Ads Advertising, for any purpose it deems
appropriate.
4. Advertising may be placed by all advertisers on a first-come
first -serve basis without regard to race, creed, color, age,
sex, or national origin on a non-discrimination basis. No
political advertising will be accepted.
5. Advertising may be purchased by advertisers on a monthly or on
an extended basis, but so as not to extend beyond October 31,
j 1980.
ADVERTISING FEES
1. A fee of $42.00 per month will be charged to each advertiser for
the placement of one advertisement. For the purposes of this
paragraph, one advertisement shall mean the placement of one
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOINES
.. .
2
transit card for each advertiser into each and every bus
operated by the City.
2. Ads Advertising shall be responsible to the City for the
collection of the placement fee from the advertisers.
3. Of each monthly placement fee of $42.00, Ads Advertising shall
retain 33 1/3% for operating expenses and shall remit to the
City 66 2/3% no later than the 15th of each month for which an
advertiser has placed an advertisement and provide a list of
monthly advertisers.
4. For any of the 20 spaces that remain unused during any calendar
month, neither Ads Advertising nor the City shall be entitled to
a fee or any percentage thereof.
5. The transit cards will be placed and replaced during the hours
of 5:30-6:00 A.M. and 10:30-12:00 P.M. by the personnel of Ads
Advertising only. The City shall be obligated only to inform
Ads Advertising of any transit cards that are damaged or need
replacement for any reason.
6. The City shall retain the use of five (5) spaces for its own
advertising and shall be permitted to use any other unsold
spaces.
7. Public service announcements will be placed by the City free of
charge up to a maximum of three (3) spaces per bus. The City
may use any or all of its five (5) spaces for this type of
message.
TERMS
1. The terms of this agreement shall be from November 1, 1979 to
October 31, 1980.
2. This contract shall be renewed automatically for successive
calendar terms, and shall remain in effect until termination by
either party upon 30 day written notification.
3. In the event that this contract is terminated by either party,
Ads Advertising shall nevertheless have the right to complete
any advertising contract that it has entered into.
Dated this 16th day of October , 1978.
THE CITY OF IOWA CITY, IOWA: IN -BUS ADVERTISING:
BY: C �1�`C( L/��Gtr� BY:
Iml GQ
Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORMBECE.IVED A APP'InvRn
BY .THE LEGAL E? 1Tl1EgT
FIICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES
I
..
_-.1'-wj
I
AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE CITY OF IOWA CITY, IOWA
AND
ADS ADVERTISING
THE PARTIES
The parties to this Agreement are the City of Iowa City, Iowa, 410 E.
Washington Street, Iowa City, Iowa (hereinafter referred to as
"City") and ADS Advertising, an advertising business owned by
Lorraine Sinnard, 1804 Sioux, Waterloo, Iowa 50702.
PURPOSE
The purpose of this Agreement is to provide a working document
between the parties for the placement of transit cards for
advertising purposes on the inside of the buses operated by the
City's Transit System.
TRANSIT CARDS
I. The transit cards to be placed in the Iowa City Transit System
buses will be 11" x 17" in size, placed horizontally.
2. Local advertising standards of good taste will apply to all
advertising.
SALES
1. Ads Advertising shall be the sole and exclusive agent for the
City in the promotion, sale, and placement of transit cards into
buses operated by the City's Transit System. (20 buses
currently, but to include 2 additional buses if added).
2. The City will allow Ads Advertising to place up to 20 cards into
each of the buses operated by the City's Transit System.
3. The City shall be permitted to use any advertising spaces on the
buses not used by Ads Advertising, for any purpose it deems
appropriate.
4. Advertising may be placed by all advertisers on a first-come
first -serve basis without regard to race, creed, color, age,
sex, or national origin on a non-discrimination basis. No
political advertising will be accepted.
5. Advertising may be purchased by advertisers on a monthly or on
an extended basis, but so as not to extend beyond October 31,
1980.
ADVERTISING FEES
I. A fee of $42.00 per month will be charged to each advertiser for
the placement of one advertisement. For the purposes of this
paragraph, one advertisement shall mean the placement of one
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES
2
transit card for each advertiser into each and every bus
operated by the City.
2. Ads Advertising shall be responsible to the City for the
collection of the placement fee from the advertisers.
3. Of each monthly placement fee of $42.00, Ads Advertising shall
retain 33 1/3% for operating expenses and shall remit to the
City 66 2/3% no later than the 15th of each month for which an
advertiser has placed an advertisement and provide a list of
monthly advertisers.
4. For any of the 20 spaces that ramain unused during any calendar
month, neither Ads Advertising nor the City shall be entitled to
a fee or any percentage thereof.
5. The transit cards will be placed and replaced during the hours
of 5:30-6:00 A.M. and 10:30-12:00 P.M. by the personnel of Ads
Advertising only. The City shall be obligated only to inform
Ads Advertising of any transit cards that are damaged or need
replacement for any reason.
6. The City shall retain the use of five (5) spaces for its own
advertising and shall be permitted to use any other unsold
spaces.
7. Public service announcements will be placed by the City free of
charge up to a maximum of three (3) spaces per bus. The City
may use any or all of its five (5) spaces for this type of
message.
TERMS
I
1. The terms of this agreement shall be from November 1, 1979 to
October 31, 1980.
i
2. This contract shall be renewed automatically for successive
calendar terms, and shall remain in effect until termination by
either party upon 30 day written notification.
3. In the event that this contract is terminated by either party,
Ads Advertising shall nevertheless have the right to complete
any advertising contract that it has entered into.
Dated this 16th day of October , 1978.
THE CITY OF IOWA CITY, IOWA
IN -BUS ADVERTISING:
BY: . 44* �✓,.kL BY: 1Y LGr
Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORMRECE.IVF;D 3 apannVgn
MY ,TIM LEGAL E? TIO f1T
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES
■
. a
s
City of Iowa City
MEMORANDUM
DATE: October 12, 1979
TO: City Council
FROM: Larry Chiat, Acting Development Coordinator=
f-40
RE: Resolution Establishing Just Compensation for Acquisition of Real
Property for the South Branch Ralston Creek Stormwater Detention Project
Pursuant to Council Resolution 79-99, adopted on March 6, 1979, the Development
Division initiated land acquisition procedures for the South Branch Ralston Creek
Stormwater Detention project. To date, this has included obtaining appraisals
and review appraisals on the four project parcels and sending preliminary acquisition
notices to the four property owners.
Since this project is receiving Community Development Block Grant funding, the
City is subject to HUD's acquisition regulations. In order to proceed further with
land acquisition activities, the City must act to establishtheamounts believed
to be -just compensation for the real property interests to be acquired. The amounts
stated in the accompanying resolution are those determined by the City's appraiser
and approved by the City's.review appraiser. Staff recommends that these amounts
be adopted by the Council as just compensation for the real property interests
specified in the accompanying resolution. After just compensation is established,
the staff will then commence negotiations for the purchase of the specified real
property interests.
LC/ssw
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOVIES
/965
{
I
l
f
L
I
jj
I
1'
i
s
City of Iowa City
MEMORANDUM
DATE: October 12, 1979
TO: City Council
FROM: Larry Chiat, Acting Development Coordinator=
f-40
RE: Resolution Establishing Just Compensation for Acquisition of Real
Property for the South Branch Ralston Creek Stormwater Detention Project
Pursuant to Council Resolution 79-99, adopted on March 6, 1979, the Development
Division initiated land acquisition procedures for the South Branch Ralston Creek
Stormwater Detention project. To date, this has included obtaining appraisals
and review appraisals on the four project parcels and sending preliminary acquisition
notices to the four property owners.
Since this project is receiving Community Development Block Grant funding, the
City is subject to HUD's acquisition regulations. In order to proceed further with
land acquisition activities, the City must act to establishtheamounts believed
to be -just compensation for the real property interests to be acquired. The amounts
stated in the accompanying resolution are those determined by the City's appraiser
and approved by the City's.review appraiser. Staff recommends that these amounts
be adopted by the Council as just compensation for the real property interests
specified in the accompanying resolution. After just compensation is established,
the staff will then commence negotiations for the purchase of the specified real
property interests.
LC/ssw
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOVIES
/965
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
:IPAP° anri:)s.;ii luI!If 1,
_a
1
i
I
I
I
I
' I
I
i
I1
i
i 1
i
i
i
City of Iowa Cit-•
r-_ MEMORANDUM
DATE: October 12, 1979
TO: City Council
FROVN: City Manager
RE: Material in Friday's Packet
Memorandum from the City Manager regarding housing code.
Memorandum from the Director of Housing and Inspection Services regarding ��
rezoning of future public housing sites.
Memorandum from the Broadband Telecommunications Specialist regarding
cable update.
Memorandum from the City Attorney regarding proposed rental of office space.
Memoranda from the Department of Public Works:
a. Discussion date for Block 64 Parking Garage
b. Bus route changes
Letter from the University of Kansas expressing compliment
downtown pedestrian mail, s regarding the
Correspondence from the U.S, Department of Commerce to the Regional Planning 97�
Commission regarding SMSA status.
Correspondence from IDOT to the Regional Planning Commission regarding
SMSA status.
Memoranda from the Regional Planning Commission;
a. Suggestions concerning future planning programs, problems and needs /
b. Agency information - Update on remainder of budget hearing schedule -ZZO
Brochure regarding Community Technology Initiatives Program
Articles:
a• "Let's Get Rid of 'The Girl"'
b."The Hawkeye Pride - Iowa City Transit System"
c.
"Vying for Viewers" /9 D
TheBuild�Line, October 1979
Memo from Parks and Rec. Director re Cemetary wall.
Agenda of Properties and tour information for Council House Violation
tour.
Material distributed by Protective Assn. of Tenants re house violations.
�-- —
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINFS
City of Iowa City
MEMORANDUM
DATE: October 11, 1979
TO: Ci Council
FROM: Ci Manager
RE: Housing Code
Enclosed are several memoranda concerning housing code enforcement.
The staff has identified solutions for the concerns which owners, operators,
and tenants have expressed to the City Council, City Manager and staff.
As we visit properties on Monday, it is hoped that consideration will be
given to the alternatives so that a consensus for resolution of the problems
can be reached at an early date.
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOINES
4967
I
I
1 '
1
1
I
�
i
i
i
1
jI
i
is
f.
/
_i
If
I
i
1
i
I,
�
City of Iowa City
MEMORANDUM
DATE: October 11, 1979
TO: Ci Council
FROM: Ci Manager
RE: Housing Code
Enclosed are several memoranda concerning housing code enforcement.
The staff has identified solutions for the concerns which owners, operators,
and tenants have expressed to the City Council, City Manager and staff.
As we visit properties on Monday, it is hoped that consideration will be
given to the alternatives so that a consensus for resolution of the problems
can be reached at an early date.
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOINES
4967
i
i
f
1 i
I
i
1
f
i
i
i
City o9 Iowa C6_y
Date: October 11, 1979
To: City Manager and City Council
From: Michael E. Kucharzak, Director
Re: Housing Code Enforcement
This memorandum is meant to be an overview of the policies, procedures,
enforcement problems, code conflicts and administrative decisions
regarding the administration of the Housing Occupancy and Maintenance
Code. This memorandum is also designed to serve as a cover memo to a
report comparing the State Housing Code and the Housing Occupancy and
Maintenance Code and is hopefully an answer to some of the questions that
have recently arisen due to the code enforcement activities of recent
months.
ANNUAL INSPECTIONS AND LICENSING
Iowa law requires that all multiple dwellings be inspected annually. The
Housing Occupancy and Maintenance Code as adopted by Council, requires
that multiple dwellings and rooming houses be inspected annually and
receive a rental permit. Owner/operators are notified by mail 60 days
prior to the expiration date of their current housing permit and by this
notice are invited to make an appointment for the annual licensing
inspection. The letter is accompanied by a permit application and a
request for inspection card that can be completed by the operator and
mailed back to the City. The owner/operator has to remit the application
fee along with the completed permit application to start the licensing
process.
Upon scheduling the annual licensing inspection, the inspector surveys
the entire building and verifies the area being licensed to the floor
plans on file in the City office. These floor plans were completed on the
majority of licensed structures during 1978-79 and while providing a
verification that room sizes and window sizes are in accordance with the
code, they also provide a valuable record of the actual portions of the
building under license. All inspections by the Housing Inspector are
conducted as official business by the City.
ORDERS AND EXTENSIONS
Upon completing the survey, the housing inspector either issues the
housing permit or a notice for the violations requiring correction.
Unless the violations are of an emergency nature or requiring immediate
attention for seasonal or other reasons, the property owner normally
receives 90 days to make the necessary corrections on the property. The
housing inspector is obligated to perform reinspections to assure that the
building is indeed brought into compliance with the code within the
prescribed time. This reinspection process is carefully monitored
through a system of dated file reminders to assure that the City's
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MONIES
2
liability under Iowa tort liability law is not neodlessly extended due to
administrative or clerical oversights. Only when an employee exercises
due care in executing statutory duties is the municipality exempt from
liability.
As the work progresses, the housing inspector has the authority to allow
extensions of one half of the previous time period allowed to make the
corrections. Thus, a 90 -day order can, upon reinspection, be extended
another 45 days, and if additional work is done at that time, an extension
can be made of 23 days. This extension process will continue, as long as a
good faith effort is being made by the owner to bring the property into
code, until time runs out. At that time the housing inspector is
obligated to refer the case to the senior housing inspector with a
recommendation for placard and condemnation of the building, rent
withholding and/or court. The end goal of all actions of the department
is compliance with the Code, not penalization to the owner/operator.
APPEAL L RIGHTS
Also required under State law and the City of Iowa City Housing Occupancy
and Maintenance Code, is the right to appeal the order issued by the
housing inspector. This right to appeal is stated on the written order
and once exercised, stops the clock in effect, by staying all further
action until such time as the appeal is heard and'a decision is made by the
Housing Appeals Board.
EMERGENCY ORDER
To deal with items of a more serious nature, an inspector may issue an
emergency order which follows the above procedures except that an
emergency order may not be written for more than 15 days and the right to
appeal does not stay action required to repair the defect and thus remove
the hazard. Emergency orders are designed to deal with hazardous
electrical, plumbing and heating problems and nuisance complaints such as
garbage and refuse disposal, pest infestations and unsanitary
maintenance.
RENT ESCROW
Rent escrow is not an item of the State Housing Code but has been included
by the City Counci to provide a tool to achieve compliance. Rent escrow
procedures are normally initiated when there has been an obvious disregard
for the order as evidenced by a recalcitrant property owner and a lack of
a good faith effort to comply with that order. Rent escrow is undertaken
by having the City housing inspector declare the building as eligible for
rent escrow and by notifying the owner and tenants of this eligibility.
The code then requires the tenants to initiate the rent escrow by
exercising their legal rights to open up an escrow account at a local
lending institution to serve as a depository for the rent. With proper
documents recorded at the court house, the Housing Inspector then
certifies the building under Rent Escrow. The City housing inspector is
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES IIOIIIES
then obligated to notify the escrow agent and the parties affected when
the building complies with the Housing Code.
RECENT PROBLEMS
The current staffing of the Housing Inspection Division including a new
supervisor, has caused a restructuring of administrative procedures
which, while providing accurate interpretation of the Housing Code as
evidenced by actual field inspections, has resulted in the uncovering of a
variety of violations that have existed for a long period of time, often
on buildings that have been approved by housing inspectors in the past.
This, of course, results in a rather frustrating situation on the part of
the public finding themselves in a situation of violation. It also makes
for a difficult enforcement role for the inspectors, who are properly
administering the code and yet receiving a great deal of criticism for
being "too strict."
The majority of the violations being uncovered deal with ceiling height
1 requirements, lack of minimum window requirements and improper handrails
and guardrails. All of the aforementioned violations are items which can
be shown to be in violation with the use of a tape measure. Previous
inspection policies did not require inspectors to take field measurements
and therefore caused a lot of violations to go unnoticed.
BOARD OF APPEALS
The situation is further complicated and becomes even more frustrating to
A the administration of the division when no relief can be granted in the
form of a hearing or appeal on items that are part of the State Housing
Code. This means that ceilings that are less than the 7'6" requirement or
windows that fail to provide the minimum amount of light and ventilation
according to the code cannot be exempted in any way by the staff or the
Housing Appeals Board since exemptions and variances are specifically
prohibited by State law. This does not prevent the City Council from
providing a mechanism for granting exemptions or completely eliminating
code sections that are not spoken to in the State law. For example, the
State Housing Code does not have a handrail and guardrail requirement.
The Iowa City Housing Occupancy and Maintenance Code does have specific
requirements for guardrails and handrails which, at the request of the
Building Board of Appeals, was taken from the Uniform Building Code and,
with the endorsement of the Housing Commission and the City Council, was
i made the law for existing buildings. This same philosophy also affects
the requirements for storm windows, smoke detectors, light switches, and
tenant/landlord checklists.
PUBLIC RELATIONS
It has been brought to the attention of the supervisors that there have
been complaints regarding the attitude and/or diplomacy of the housing
j inspectors. Comment has been made that other law officers such as police
officers use discretion when enforcing the code. We all know that a
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOINES
a
Police officer will not give you a ticket for driving 31 miles per hour in
a 30 mph zone.
Housing Inspectors do not have such discretion since the Code requires
that "upon determination that all applicable provisions of the Housing
Code and of any rules and regulations adopted pursuant thereto, and other
applicable codes of the City of Iowa City, Iowa have been complied with by
the operator, the Department of Housing and Inspection Services shall
issue a rental permit for said specific dwelling or dwelling unit."
To use our automobile analogy, we are not talking about moving violations,
but conditions similar to the regulations requiring state inspections of
automobiles prior to sale; if you have defects in your car you will not
get a white title.
Annual licensing inspections with a code that is going through several
changes and experiencing growing pains can be extremely taxing to the
relationships with the public and internally with the staff. Cognizant of
the debilitating effect a day -in and day -out involvement with the Housing
sessions toe can ve on refreshethesknowledgethe thatethetilnspectoent rscts havengainedrandito
f provide educational opportunities to reinforce the health safety aspects
of the code. This alone, while improving the abilities of the inspectors,
i cannot alleviate the frustrations
recognition of a code that does not permit a
of the fact that hardships are readily created through its
enforcement and its blatant absence of any means for granting relief in
' those cases where special or unusual circumstances warrant such relief.
a
Since we have shared the problem, we feel obligated to offer a possible
solution to the inability to use discretion. Perhaps the Code could be
reworded so that certain items dealing with life. safety and the State
Code could be grouped into a section that would become mandatory prior to
issuance of a license. Other code items such as nuisance items, garbage,
rubbish and the like, could be separated from the license requirements.
5 Of course, the inspector would be obligated to enforce the code items not
part of the license but would be able to pursue their corrections without
5 holding up the license or suspending a license once issued.
it
The Director of the Department of Housing and Inspection Services was
hired in 1977 to administer the department, in part, due to the fact that
he possesses some 17 years of experience in the administration of housing
codes. It should be noted that much of the experience gained dealt with
Iowa cities and while few are aware of the state housing law, none, to my
knowledge, enforce the law to the levels expected in Iowa City. It is not
;+ uncommon for cities in Iowa to have housing appeals boards that grant
consideration and relief to prope
corrected wrty owners having violations that cannot
be readily ithout creating hardships as long as those
I violations do not affect the health and safety of the occupants. Many
cities in Iowa have chosen to adopt the Uniform Housing Code and have
disregarded the State Housing Code. I do not wish to encourage the
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES IIOIIIES
L
5
/11
breaking of any law, however, it should be noted that a strict adherence
to an obsolete and callous state ordinance is the bases for the problems
and frustrations being experienced here in Iowa City in our good faith
attempt to provide decent, safe and sanitary housing.
The staff in the Department of Housing and Inspection Services shall and
continues to carry out the directives of the Council as provided in the
ordinances it adopts. I can assure the Council, the Manager and the
general public that our goal to serve and to administer the code equally
to all has been foremost in our objectives.
bj/sp
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 110IRES
City of Iowa Cit"
MEMORANDUM
Date: October 10, 1979
To: Michael E. Kucharzak, Neal G. Berlin and City Council
From: Terry Steinbach, Senior Housing Inspector
Re: State Housing Code
The following is an examination of the State Housing Code; Section 413 of
the Code of Iowa, 1979 edition. This examination relates to the Uniform
Building Code which the State of Iowa has adopted as the standard of
specifications used for new construction. Comparisons are also made of
the Iowa City Housing Code, Chapter 17 of the Code of Ordinances of Iowa
City. The purpose of this analysis is to show the inconsistencies and
irrelevancies of the State requirements as they apply to everday building
and housing inspection. Some of the State housing requirements are quite
outdated and a thorough review of the State Code is needed to ensure a
standard for dwelling units which is consistent with the standard of
living of the residents of Iowa in the 1970's and 1980's.
It is the feeling of this department that due to the inconsistencies of
the State adopted codes, that the State Housing Code, Section 413 be
repealed. The Uniform Housing Code, 1979 edition, is written in
combination with the Uniform Building Code which the State has adopted.
It is this department's feeling that the Uniform Housing Code would fill
the void left by such a repeal, without creating any further incon-
sistencies between the two adopted codes.
The following analysis has been kept as brief as possible in order that
the broadness of the problem can be recognized. Some of the following
State Housing Code sections are followed by personal comments regarding
enforcement, and others are followed by Uniform Building Code sections in
order that the direct inconsistency may be shown. The enforcement of one
set of standards, rather than two or three, would eliminate many problems
in enforcement of the Housing Code and eliminate many problems in the
creation of Housing Code requirements.
It must also be mentioned at this time that the State Housing Code leaves
no avenues open to grant variances to specific requirements.
Chapter 413.9, Minimum Requirements - Power of Cities. "...No ordinance,
regulation, ruling or decision of any municipal body, officer or authority
shall repeal, amend, modify or dispense with any of the said minimum
requirements laid down in this chapter, except as specifically provided
herein." The Uniform Housing Code allows an appeals Board the discretion
that has not been given them in the State Housing Code. Further, it
should be noted that in Chapter 413.11, Application of Provisions,
"Provisions of this chapter in conflict with the State Building Code shall
not apply where the State Building Code has been adopted, or when the
State Building Code applies throughout the State."
bdw2/10
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS•DES IIOIRES
n
A. P9.
2023,
#413.3
DEFINITIONS
5.
Family
Occupancy
For the purposes of this chapter, a "family" is a group of
persons living together, whether related to each other by birth
or not, and may consist of one or more persons.
Comment:
Definition is so vague and unrestricted that it permits dwellings to
be overcrowded by often non -related groups of people.
Proposed Change:
5. Family Occupancy
For the purpose of this chapter, a "family" shall mean one
person or two (2) or more persons related by blood, marriage,
adoption, placement by a governmental agency, social service
agency, or a family may consist of two (2), but not more than
twelve (12) persons not related by blood, marriage or adoption,
occupying a living unit as an individual, housekeeping
organization.
Pg. 2026, #413.13 REAR YARDS
Immediately behind every single and two family dwelling hereafter
erected there shall be, except as hereinafter provided, a rear yard
extending across the lot, for a distance equal to at least one width
of the dwelling. Such yard shall be open and unobstructed from the
ground to the sky. Every part of such yard shall be directly
accessible from every other part thereof. The depth of said yard
shall be measured at right angles from the rear lot line to the
extreme rear part of the dwelling. Such rear yard space shall in no
case be less than ten feet deep, and two feet additional for each
story of the dwelling on said lot above the first.
An irregular shaped lot, or lot subject to building line
restrictions, may be occupied by a dwelling without complying with
the provisions of this section, if the total yard space equals that
required by this section.
Comment:
"Open and unobstructed" yard space is ambiguous. Does this prohibit
the installation of temporary storage sheds, play equipment, etc.?
Does it also create a problem in the installation of tall fences
around gardens? The local Zoning Code and/or State Zoning Code might
be a better instrument to regulate lot size and use.
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES
I
2
C. Pg. 1912 #413.20 WINDOWS
In every dwelling hereafter erected every room shall have at least
one window opening directly upon the street or a public way or other
public space which measures fifteen feet in width, or upon a yard or
court of the dimensions specified in this chapter, and located on the
same lot, and such window shall be so located as to properly light
all portions of such rooms. This provision shall not, however, apply
to rooms used as kitchens, art galleries, swimming pools,
gymnasiums, squash courts or for similar purposes, provided such
r000ms are adequately lighted and ventilated. For purposes of this
section, adequate ventilation may be either a system of mechanical
ventilation which provides not less than 15 interchanges per hour or
natural ventilation as specified in Section 413.21; and further, for
purposes of this section adequate light may be either a system of
artificial light which provides healthful and sanitary conditions in
all spaces of the room or natural light as specified in Section
413.21.
I
Comment:
i
This language conflicts with the State Building Code which defines a
public way as space greater than 10' in width. Clarification of
language would certainly eliminate the ambiguity as to the window
requirement. Furthermore, according to my calculations, a
reasonable requirement for adequate mechanical ventilation would be
five (5) air changes per hour rather than fifteen (15).
D.
Pg. 1912, #413.25 WINDOWS IN BATHROOMS
1
in every dwelling hereafter erected, every water closet compartment
I and every bathroom shall have an aggregate window area of at least
four square feet between stop aids opening directly upon the street,
or upon a yard or court of the dimensions specified in this chapter.
Every such window shall be made so as to open in all its parts.
Nothing in this section contained shall be construed so as to
prohibit a general toilet room containing several water closet
f compartments separated from each other by dwarf partitions, provided
such toilet room is adequately lighted and ventilated to the outdoor
air as above provided, and that such water closets are supplemental
to the water closet accomodations required by the provisions of
Section 413.32.
The above provisions shall not apply to hotels or dwellings that have
a system of forced ventilation so constructed as entirely to change
the air in every bathroom,
every seven minutes. toilet room or water closet compartment
I j
Comment:
In calculating the normal size of bathrooms and the standard air flow
Of most commercially available vent fan systems, it would be much
more realistic to require that a complete air change in a bathroom
I� I should only take place every twelve minutes.
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
iCEDAR RAPIDS -DES 1401PIES
a
3
E. P9. 1911, #413.14 BUILDING TO SIDE LINE OF LOT - SIDE YARDS
Dwellings hereafter erected may be built up to the side lot line, if
the side wall is without windows, or if with windows the air and
light required by this chapter are provided otherwise than by windows
on the lot line, or if the side lot line abuts on a street or alley.
If, however, any side yard is left, it shall be open and unobstructed
from the ground to the sky, and its width shall be proportionate to
the height of the dwelling, and no side yard shall be less in width
in any part than as follows:
1. Multiple Dwelling. In the case of all multiple dwlelings
hereafter erected, one story in height and having a side yard,
the width of the side yard measured to the side lot line shall
be at least four feet, and such side yard shall be increased in
Width by one foot for each additional above the first.
2. Private Dwellings and Two-Famil Dwellings. In the case of
private dwellings and two-family dwellings In
erected,
one story or two stories in height, the width of the side yard
measured to the side lot line shall be at least four feet; such
side yard shall be increased in width one foot for each
additional story above the second.
3. Distance Between Buildings on the Same Lot. Where more than
one dwelling is erected upon the same lot, the distance between
them shall not be less than eight feet in the case of dwellings
i of one or two stories in height, this distance to be increased
two feet for each additional story above the second.
i
Comment:
These items might be addressed better in a state or local zoning
ordinance.
F. Pg. 1911, #413.15 COURTS - SIZE OF
The size of all courts in dwellings hereafter erected shall be
proportionate to the height of the dwelling. No court shall be less
than any part than the minimum sizes prescribed in this section. The
minimum width of an outer court for a one-story dwelling shall be
five feet, for a two-story dwelling six feet, for a three-story
dwelling seven feet, and shall increase one foot for each additional
story above three stories. The least dimension of an inner court
shall never be less than twice the minimum width prescribed by this
section for an outer court. The width of all courts adjoining the
lot line shall be measured to the lot line and not to an opposite
building.
Comment:
From a residential viewpoint, the construction of courts has been
rare for the last 20 years and these requirements are addressed in
Section 1306C of the Uniform Building Code.
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MONIES
■
4
G. �. 1119
#413.16 COVERED COURTS
i
No court of a dwelling hereafter erected shall be covered by a roof
Or Skylight. Every such court shall be at every point open IroBi the
ground to the sky unobstructed; except that in the case of hotels,
courts may start on the floor level of the lowest bedroom story, and
in the case of other multiple dwellings where there are stores or
shops on the lower story or stories, courts may start at the top of
such lower story or stories.
Comment:
This requirement should be introduced into a building code.
H. PA. 1911, #413.17 AIR INTAKE
In all dwellings hereafter erected every inner court extending
through more than one story shall be provided with a horizontal
intake at the bottom. air
Comment:
The Building Code Section 1306C. states the same requirement in more
specific terms.
I. Pg. 19111 #413.18 CORNERS OF COURTS
Nothing contained in the foregoing sections concerning courts shall
be construed as preventing the cutting off of the corners of said
courts.
Comment:
! This requirement should be in a building code, however, it is
probably quite obsolete.
J. Pg. 1912, #413 23 HEIGHT OF ROOMS
r
No room in a dwelling hereafter erected shall be in an
y part les
! than seven feet high from the finished floor to fininshed ceilings;
1
i the average height of any such room shall not be less than seven feet
i six inches, accept that an attic room used for living purposes in a
private or two-family dwelling need be seven feet six inches in one-
half its area and that areas less than five feet shall not be
I considered as a part of the required room area.
s
Comment:
The former Senior Housing Inspector has stated that "Numerous
occupied units have been erected subsequent to this code which do not
meet the seven feet, six inch average. Enforcing this code could
require vacating 100 to 200 units in Iowa City." This inspector
feels that there could be some sort of happy medium which would still
i afford the safety needed to satisfy the intent of this code. It
could be a dated or limited grandfather clause.
I
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 140IIICS
5
It should also be noted that this requirement is currently being
enforced and appeal statistics show that said enforcement is
creating quit, a hardship on owners or oreraLors. the
corrections necessary to meet the rpquirpmpl, of l.he osto(iof making
those cases where the decision to make corrections has been made,
create a hardship and eventually that cost is passed on to the
tenants. Other solutions result in the units being vacated or a
change in use. Many of the units being vacated are otherwise quite
livable dwellings.
K. Pg. 1913 BASEMENT OR CELLAR UNDER ENTRANCE FLOOR
Every dwelling hereafter erected shall have a basement, cellar or
excavated space under the entire entrance floor, at least three feet
in depth or shall be elevated above the ground so that there will be
a clear air space of at least 18 inches between the top of the ground
and the floor joists so as to insure ventilation and protection from
dampness; provided, however, that cement floors may be laid on the
ground level if desired.
i
Comment:
This requirement is dealt with in Sections 2517(c)2 and 2517(c)6 of
the Uniform Building Codewith much more applicable language being
used there. I would suggest that this section be dropped from
Chapter 413.
I
L. Pa. 1914, 8413.38 STAIRS IN TWO-STORY MULTIPLE DWELLINGS
Every multiple dwelling two stories or more in height hereafter
erected shall have at least one flight of stairs extending from the
entrance floor to the roof; and the stairs in public halls therein
I shall each be at least four feet wide in the clear. All stairs shall
be constructed with a rise of not more than eight inches and with
treads not less than ten inches wide and not less than four feet long
1, in the clear.
Comment:
I am not sure that the requirement of a stairway from the entrance to
the roof has ever been enforced. The Uniform Building Code, Section
3305(o), states a less restrictive requirement of said stairway
needed in every building four (4) or more stories in height with a
{ i roof pitch not greater than 4 in 12.
{r + M. Pg. 1915, 8413.45 CELLAR ENTRANCE
I I
In every multiple dwelling hereafter erected there shall be an
entrance to the cellar or other lowest story from the outside of said
building.
MICROFILMED BY
j JORM MICROLAB
I CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES
6
Comment:
New construction design generally uses the lowest floor level for
dwelling units and has only a small utility room for furnace,
electric meters, etc. Such design does not permit outside entrance,
but the rooms are fire isolated from the dwelling units. Further
consideration to this requirement should be given.
N. Pg. 1915, #413.54 DUMB -WAITER AND ELEVATOR SHAFTS
All dumb -waiters and elevators hereafter constructed in multiple
dwellings shall be in enclosures constructed of fire -resistive
materials with fire -restrictive doors at all openings at each story,
including the cellar. In the case of dumb -waiter shafts such door
shall be self-closing and such shaft shall be completely separated
j from the stairs by walls of approved fire -resistive material
enclosing the same.
This section does not apply to dumb -waiter shafts or elevator shafts
which are already in existence, but only to those which may be
installed after this chapter takes affect.
Comment:
This code requirement is already covered by prevailing fire codes'.
0. Pg. 1915, #413.56 HEIGHT OF DWELLINGS
No dwelling shall be increased in height so that it exceeds A times
the width of the widest street on which it abuts nor in any case
exceeds 100 feet.
Comment:
This requirement is addressed more effectively in current zoning or
building codes.
P. Pg. 1915, #413.58 SKYLIGHTS - VENTILATORS
All new skylights hereafter placed in a multiple dwelling shall be
provided with ventilators having a minimum opening of 40 square
inches and also with either fixed or movable louvers or with movable
sashes, and shall be of such size as may be determined to be
practical by the health officer.
Comment:
Other sections (light and ventilation) establish requirements
without meaning to be specific as to the type or method of
installation. Such specificity, as contained above, is often not the
best solution to the problems involved in skylight installations.
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES IIOIMES
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 140111ES
Lam.^1
7
Q.
Pg. 1916, #413.62 NUMBER OF WATER CLOSETS
In every dwelling existing prior to the passage of this chapter,
there shall be provided at least one water closet for every two
apartments, groups or suits of rooms, or a fraction thereof, except
that in multiple dwellings of Class B there shall be provided at
least one water closet for every twenty occupants or fraction
thereof.
Comment:
The Iowa City Houisng Codes require one full bath in each dwelling
unit or one facility for every eight roomers. I would suggest that
the total number of occupants using a single bath facility be lowered
from twenty persons to, say, 10 or 12 persons.
R.
Pg. 1917, #413.64 COLOR OF CELLAR WALLS
The cellar walls and cellar ceiling of every multiple dwelling shall
by the owner by thoroughly whitewashed or painted a light color and
shall be so maintained by him when required by the health officer.
Comment:
This requirement is quite irrelevant.
S.
Pg. 1917, #413.65 FLOOR BENEATH WATER CLOSETS
(
In all two-family dwellings and multiple dwellings, the floor or
other surface beneath and around water closets and sinks shall be
maintained in good order and repaired and, if of wood, shall be kept
well painted.
I
Comment:
j
I would recommend that this code requirement be changed to more
t
i
relevant wording.
Proposed Change:
i
In all dwelling units the floor or other surface beneath and around
water closets, lavatories and sinks shall be constructed and
f
maintained so as to be reasonably impervious to water.
' T.
Pg. 1917, #413.67 WATER SUPPLY - SINKS
Every dwelling not exempted in Section 413.6 shall have within the
dwelling at least one proper sink with running water furnished in
sufficient quantity at one or more places exclusive of the cellar.
Two-family dwellings and multiple dwellings of Class A there shall
be, at least one sink on every floor, accessible to each family on
the floor occupied by said family without passing through any other
i
apartment. Where City water is not available, the owner shall
i
provide proper and suitable tanks, pumps or other appliances to
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 140111ES
M.
0
8
receive and to distribute an adequate and sufficient supply of water
at each floor in the said dwelling at all times of the year, during
all hours of the day and night. But a failure in the general supply
of city water shall not be construed to be a failure on the part of
such owner, provided proper and suitable appliances to receive and
distribute such water have been provided in said dwellings.
Comment:
Other codes, such as the Uniform Building Code and the Uniform
Plumbing Code, are more specific in regards to these requirements.
This state code is so minimal that it is unlikely that most people
would tolerate only one sink per floor. It might also be noted that
a sink is requried in any room containing a toilet.
U. Pg. 1916, #413.68 CATCH BASINS
In the case of dwellings where, because of lack of city water supply
or sewers, sinks with running water are not provided inside the
I dwellings, one or more catch basins or some other approved
convenience for the disposal of waste water, if necessary in the
opinion of the health officer, shall be provided in the yard or
court, level with the surface thereof and at a point easy of access
to the occupants of such dwelling.
Comment:
i
I This requirement is quite outdated.
V. Pg. 1917, #413.70 COLOR OF WALLS OF COURTS
In multiple dwellings the walls of all courts, unless built of a
light color brick or stone, shall be thoroughly whitewashed by the
owner or shall be painted a light color by him and shall be so
renewed whenever necessary, as may be required by the health officer.
Comment:
This requirement is quite irrelevant.
W. Po. 1917, #413.71 COLOR OF WALLS OF OTHER ROOMS
In all multiple dwellings erected prior to this chapter, the health
officer may require the walls and ceilings of every room that does
not open directly on the street to be calcimined or painted so as to
furnish adequate lighting of such room and may require this to be
renewed as often as may be necessary.
Comment:
Perhaps reconsideration of this requirement should be made.
rl;7^ - - ...
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 110111ES
9
K. PU- 1910, #413.05 SINKS AND WAIER CLOSUS
In all multiple dwellings erected prior to the pasage of this
chapter, the woodwork encasing sinks, except sinks in butler's
pantries and water closets, shall be removed and space underneath
said fixtures shall be left open. The floor and wall surfaces
beneath and around the said fixture shall be put in good order and
repair and if of wood shall be kept well painted. Defective and
unsanitary water closet fixtures shall be replaced by proper
fixtures, as defined by this chapter.
Comment:
Lavatories with built-in vanity type cabinetry are a popular and
convenient style in bathrooms. This type of construction does not
necessarily indicate that maintenance would be unsanitary.
Y. Pg. 1917, #413.73 ANIMALS
No horse, cow, calf, swine, sheep, goat, chickens, geese or ducks
shall be kept in any dwelling or part thereof. Nor shall any such
animal be kept on the same lot or premises with a dwelling except
under such conditions as may be prescribed by the health officer. No
such animal, except a horse, shall under any circumstance be on the
same lot or premises with a multiple dwelling. No dwelling or
premises thereof shall be used for the storage or handling of rags or
j junk.
Comment:
It would be my feeling that the last two sentences be removed from
this requirement.
Z. P9. 1920 ENFORCEMENT IN CERTAIN CITIES
In cities of more than 100,000 population, as shown by the last
federal census, having a department or division of building
inspection in charge of a person devoting his entire time to the
supervision of building construction and to the enforcement of laws
and ordinances relating to building construction, repair,
alteration, removal and to related matters, the City Council may, by
ordinance, provide that said person shall be charged with the powers
and duties charged in Sections 413.29-413.103 to the Board of Health
and to the health officer, and that all plans, specifications,
affidavits, forms and statements in said sections presecribed to be
filed with the health officer shall be filed with such person; and
that said person may issue valid permits, certificates and
ordinances providing, without the certificate of the health officer
here and before provided to be filed in the office of the department
of building.
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES
1
10
+ 1
i
Comment:
I
I feel that this enforcement clause might more effectively be changed
to populations of more than 10,000 rather than 100,000.
AA• l9. 1912, #413.22 LIVING ROOMS AND BEDROOMS
In every dwelling hereafter erected all living rooms and bedrooms
shall be of the following minimum sizes: Every such room shall
contain at least 80 square feet of floor area except the kitchenettes
may be 40 square feet in area; no such room, except kitchenette,
shall be, in any part of required area less than seven feet wide. In
all dwellings and in each apartment, group or suite of rooms there
shall be at least one room containing not less than 120 square feet
of floor area.
Uniform Building Code Section 1307.(b) FLOOR AREA
I Every dwelling shall have at least one room which shall have not less
150 square feet of floor area. Other habitable rooms except kitchens
shall have an area of not less than 70 square feet.
Comment:
The Iowa City Building Inspection Division has amended the Uniform
1 Building Code to read the same as the State Housing Code, however,
the State should be aware of the discrepancy between the two since it
I has adopted both codes. The Housing Code of Iowa City is consistent
with the State Housing Code in the requirement of 80 square feet as a
minimum for the size of any habitable room.
I
i
i
ji
4
2
1
i
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOINES
City of Iowa CIC,
MEMORANDUM
Date: September 7, 1979
To: Neal G. Berlin, City Manager
From: Terry Steinbach, Senior Housing Inspector
Re: H.I.S. - 10% Window Requirement
In an attempt to supply the City Council with information regarding the
number of dwelling units in Iowa City without sufficient window area, I
have taken a survey from the Housing Inspectors since our departmental
filing system is not capable of supplying information regarding the number
of specific housing code violations.
In the past 6-8 months, the Housing Division has issued at least 21
notices of violation with regard to lack of sufficient (window/skylight)
natural light. Of these, Black's Gaslight Village is the only property
listed on the National Register of Historic Places. A breakdown of these
violations shows that:
1) Five cases are still in violation with time left on orders to
correct.
2) Seven cases, correction has been completed.
3) Two cases resulted in vacation of units or rooms with use changed to
storage.
(These units also lacked required ceiling height.)
4) Seven cases have been appealed.
(Five cases have been upheld by Housing Board of Appeals -- Four at
Black's Gaslight Village.)
(Two cases not yet heard by Board.)
The problems of lack of required window area and ceiling height generally
arise in buildings which were originally designed for use as single family
dwellings. The use and classification have been changed by the owners in
order to accommodate more occupants for rental purposes and, therefore,
changes need to be made to meet the minimum housing requirements.
In addressing the question of hardship to the owner/operator in complying
with the housing code, it is my opinion that this requirement does not
cause an unfair amount of hardship on the responsible party. The
violation of lack of required ceiling height has caused much greater
expense to those persons who have chosen to correct the violation rather
than vacate the unit.
bj5/7
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
% CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MORIES
City of Iowa Citi
MEMORANDUM
Date: October 2, 1979
To: City Manager and City Council
From: Michael Kucharzak, Director of Housing & Inspection Services
Re: Rezoning of Future Public Housing Site
At the informal Council session of September 24, 1979, the City Council
indicated a willingness to pursue placement of public housing on the
site owned by University Baptist Church. As part of the option to
purchase the property executed by the City, the buyer is obligated to
rezone the property from RlA to R3. This rezoning is necessary to allow
for the proposed construction of 20 units of public housing.
This rezoning is in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan adopted by
the City Council and is compatible with the residential use immediately
adjoining the site.
The Housing Coordinator has been instructed to contact Don Schmeiser and
arrange for the necessary hearing for rezoning.
bc2/18
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOINES
■ r
1
City of Iowa CI!'
MEMORANDUM
Date: October 11, 1979
To: City Council
From: Drew Shaffer
Re: Cable Update
Hawkeye CableVision has applied for an "exception" to the Planning and
Zoning Commission (and to the Board of Adjustment) for the tower site
northwest of property being developed by Hy -Vee on Highway 1 North. A
public hearing date for this matter is forthcoming.
Due to unforeseen problems, Hawkeye has announced a new system activation
timetable. They will begin laying cable on January 1, 1980 and March 1,
1980 is the new system activation date. This is still within the
ordinance requirements (which calls for system activation by March 28,
1980). Unforeseen problems include trouble confirming equipment delivery
dates and trouble finding the construction crews necessary to build the
Iowa City system. Several equipment delivery dates have now been
established and Mr. Blough may decide to organize his own construction
crews to build the Iowa City system.
bdw4/1
11(of
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOIMES
i
City of Iowa City
MEMORANDUM
DATE: October 12, 1979
TO: The Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Neal Berlin, City Manager
John Hayek, City Attorney
RE: Proposed Rental of Office Space -- Henry Louis Building
This is to apprise you of the need for additional office space for
the Iowa City Legal Department and the availability of the upper
floor of the Henry Louis Building for such purposes.
Louis Building Now Available
Numerous alternative locations have been discussed during the past
year or so as potential office space to alleviate the overcrowding
which now exists in the Civic Center. Mr. Dennis Kraft, Director
of Planning and Program Development, has been negotiating with
Mr. Dick Blum for rental space of the upper floor of the Henry
Louis Building located at 506 E. College within a block of the Civic
Center. The building is owned by Mr. Henry Louis individually.
Mr. Kraft has negotiated an agreement which we feel would be ad-
vantageous to the administration of City government and would in
fact enhance delivery of legal services to the City.
Proposed Agreement
The proposed rental agreement for office space would be for a
five (5) year term at the rate of $5.25/square foot for a total
of $612.50/month or $7,350/year. This payment would include heat,
water, electricity and air conditioning. Refuse collection would
not be included. The facilities are now clean and ready for oc-
cupancy, with no remodeling required. No furnishings would be
needed except perhaps reception area furniture.
The upper floor contains four offices, the largest of which would
serve as a combination library -conference room. The premises are
pleasant and especially suited to the unique needs of the Legal
Department. Rosemary Vitosh, Director of Finance, agrees that the
rental rates are reasonable. Even though the search for additional
space has gone on for some time, there is no specific budget item
for such space. Thus, a budget amendment would be required to
tap the general fund balance.
IIICROFIIMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES I10IME5
-2-
Overcrowding and Increased Workload
It is becoming more apparent to even the casual observer that the
increased City duties and roncommitant: additional staff, have rosulted
in overcrowding in the Civic Center. This overcrowding has in turn
resulted in less than optimum working conditions.
The newer programs which Iowa City has instituted include the Senior
Center, public housing, housing code enforcement and housing rehab-
ilitation programs. Each program results not only in increased staff
but also in more demands on the Legal staff. In response to these
changes, Mr. Dennis Kraft of the Planning Department has been in-
vestigating various sites in close proximity to the Civic Center.
These sites have been rejected as office space for the Legal Depart-
ment for the following reasons:
1. Third Floor - Davis Building.
This location was considered for the Legal Department, but was
rejected in early summer of this year as economically infeasible.
Complete remodeling would have been required.
2. Old Elks Building.
This building, located at the southwest corner of Gilbert and
Washington, needs extensive remodeling, and the owners are not
willing to do it. It is also poorly ventilated and generally
not suited for office space.
3. Old Post Office.
The first and second floor of the Old Post Office, plus the
mezzanine, are reserved for the proposed Senior Center activities.
The original plans were for the Legal and Planning Departments
to be moved to the third floor. Expected occupancy is at least
one year away. However, Senior Center activities may well ex-
pand to the third floor. Also, there is now some question of
whether non -federally funded departments such as Legal could
be housed therein. The Senior Center and the Planning Depart-
ment of course qualify as proper occupants.
Recommendation
Considering the rather unique needs of the City legal staff, it is
our recommendation that the City Council consider the proposed
rental of additional office space as a way to alleviate current
overcrowding in the Civic Center. Moving the Legal Department
would also free up space for other departmental needs.
We respectfully request your consideration of the proposed move.
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS•DES 1101NES
. ,,
^City ®4 Iowa C14'-
Date: October 8, 1979
To: City Council, City Manager
From: Richard J. Plastino, Director of Public Works
Re: Discussion Date for Block 64 Parking Garage \
In the bid specifications for the Block 64 garage, we had included a bid
alternate. This bid alternate stated that we would make a decision on
the Block 64 garage by November 2 and there was an item for the contractor
to reduce his bid for this early start. There were no deducts by any of
the bidders for this early start. Accordingly, we have deferred Council
discussion of the completion date on the Block 83-84 garage until November 1
and action by Council, if any, would be taken on Tuesday, November 13.
Letters are being solicited from the contractor and consultant on the
probability of the first parking garage being partially open by Thanks-
giving. Pushing the discussion to a later date will allow for more
accurate prediction of whether the garage will or will not be open by
Thanksgiving. As you recall, if the first garage will be partially open
by Thanksgiving, many of the obstacles to awarding the bid on the second
garage will be removed. On the other hand, if the first garage will not
be open by Thanksgiving, the Council has stated that it will probably
not award the bid for the second garage.
In summary, this item will be scheduled for informal discussion on
November 12 and Council action, if any, will be taken on November 13.
bcl/18
cc: Block 64 File #1
Rosemary Vitosh
Joe Fowler
Dennis Kraft
Dwight Churchill
Dennis Neu
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOINES
071
City of Iowa Cit,
MEMORAND M
Date: October 5, 1979
To: Neal Berlin 1
From: Dick Plastino
Re: Bus Route Changes /
Neal, the proposed schedule f r obtaining and analyzing data from the
general riding public is as follows:
By October 10 - have cards placed in buses and issue news release advising
riding public of the availability of the cards to record their opinion.
By October 10-19 - receive comments on cards and start operation of the
Washington Street transit mall. Analysis of the operation of the mall is
an important adjunct to this procedure since it affects the time schedule
for several of the routes. The efficiency of this operation must be
analyzed at the same time that route changes, if any, are consisdered.
October 19-26 - complete receiving cards and begin analysis of data on
cards. Formulate alternatives and recommendations.
October 26 - send information to Council in packet.
October 29 - schedule for informal discussion or possibly schedule for
public hearing.
cc: Hugh Mose
bj3/21
MICROFILMED RY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS•DES 140INES
111; -
i
City of Iowa Cit,
MEMORAND M
Date: October 5, 1979
To: Neal Berlin 1
From: Dick Plastino
Re: Bus Route Changes /
Neal, the proposed schedule f r obtaining and analyzing data from the
general riding public is as follows:
By October 10 - have cards placed in buses and issue news release advising
riding public of the availability of the cards to record their opinion.
By October 10-19 - receive comments on cards and start operation of the
Washington Street transit mall. Analysis of the operation of the mall is
an important adjunct to this procedure since it affects the time schedule
for several of the routes. The efficiency of this operation must be
analyzed at the same time that route changes, if any, are consisdered.
October 19-26 - complete receiving cards and begin analysis of data on
cards. Formulate alternatives and recommendations.
October 26 - send information to Council in packet.
October 29 - schedule for informal discussion or possibly schedule for
public hearing.
cc: Hugh Mose
bj3/21
MICROFILMED RY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS•DES 140INES
111; -
!^,
I 16'r
�\�casry4rr - _
Sf / v I�
4„ylU
THE UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS
Uepurinuml. of IInnILh,
1'hy8hatl KduuuLlun rend HeurulLLhln
l,uwrunuu, Kunsns 4111015
�?ECEI'i�:�: il;f g 1919
Mayor of Iowa City
Superintendent of Parks and Recreation
City of Iowa City
City Hall
Iowa City, Iowa 52242
Dear Sirs:
My compliments to you and your hard work on the development of the pedestrian
mall in downtown Iowa City. The mall is both beautiful and functional. Such an
undertaking is a credit to those who possessed the foresight to develop such an
esthetically pleasing site. Again, my compliments to you.
Sincerely,
llnvldJ. ymalski
Main Campus, Lawrence
College of Health Sciences and Hospital, Kansas City and Wichita
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOIRES
197.3
p
i
r II
{
I IJ
i
I
I
I
!^,
I 16'r
�\�casry4rr - _
Sf / v I�
4„ylU
THE UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS
Uepurinuml. of IInnILh,
1'hy8hatl KduuuLlun rend HeurulLLhln
l,uwrunuu, Kunsns 4111015
�?ECEI'i�:�: il;f g 1919
Mayor of Iowa City
Superintendent of Parks and Recreation
City of Iowa City
City Hall
Iowa City, Iowa 52242
Dear Sirs:
My compliments to you and your hard work on the development of the pedestrian
mall in downtown Iowa City. The mall is both beautiful and functional. Such an
undertaking is a credit to those who possessed the foresight to develop such an
esthetically pleasing site. Again, my compliments to you.
Sincerely,
llnvldJ. ymalski
Main Campus, Lawrence
College of Health Sciences and Hospital, Kansas City and Wichita
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOIRES
197.3
UNITED STATES PARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Office of Federal Statistical Policy and Standards
., ♦� Washington, O.C. 20230
ou 0 •i 197
rAo("�
F y�
J014kismN COUNTY REQ i
Mr. Harry Hokanson
Acting Executive Director OCT 91979
Johnson County Regional Planning
Camaission PLANNING COMNIw,IUN_
225 South Dubuque Street
Iowa City, Iowa 52240
Dear Mr. Hokanson;
This is in reply to your letter of September 11, 1979, concerning
the Iowa City, Iowa Standard Metropolitan Statistical Area (SMSA).
Urbanized areas are defined by the U.S. Bureau of the Census according
to specific criteria. The urbanized area designation is separate from
the SMSA designation. Fln the case of the FHWA and UMTA trocrams the
urbanized area,.rather.than the SMSA, is used to allocate funds.
---
- Y -there is no. na
urbanized area for Iowa City; even g e
-area is about to be desi ted an•-
9 sMSA.�he_urbaniye3�yrea�:£or "
Iowa City,Will be -defined around.April 1981 following the availability
0f_tbLQaa8D_census. dot _
I hope I have clarified this point. If I can be of further help to
you in this matter, please let me know.
Sincerely,
-'JOSEPH W. DUNCAN
Director
i
l-
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES IIOIHES
1914
I
i.. of Tq4+
` O
illG1)4 01G-1<rl�`i%'%G E Iv1L�L
° APR
c2
PLANNING AND RESEARCH DIVISION
l
Yow
B00 LINCOLN WAY AMES, IOWA 50010
April 20, 1979 REF. NO. 708.540
fir. Emil Brandt, Executive Director
Johnson County Regional Planning Commission
2211 South Dubuque Street
Iowa City, Iowa 52240
Dear Mr. Brandt:
This is in response to your request for information concerning the possible designation
of Iowa City and environs as a Metropolitan Statistical Area (I1SA) and the effect
of such designation on the need to develop a formal urbanized area comprehensive,
cooperative and continuing (3-C) transportation Planning and programming process.
Such a process, which conforms to federal and state laws and policies, must be
established for any urban area of 50,000 or more population before a pronram of
highway and public transportation projects - elioible for federal financial assistance
can be approved by the U.S. Department of Transportation. The develoor..ent of an
acceptable 3-C transportation planning process for the Iowa City Urban Area should
be facilitated because such a process has been partially carried on by the Johnson
County Regional Planning Commission since 1970.
Although the 3-C planning process is sometimes regarded only as a requirement to
receive federal funds for project implementation, it should be viewed as a mechanism
that can encourage and promote the development of a multimodal transportation system
which will serve the metropolitan area and state effectively and efficiently. The
U.S. and Iowa DOT's will provide assistance and coonerate with local officials, actinq
through a metropolitan planning organization (f -!P0), in the development of transportation
plans and programs which are based on transportation needs. These plans and programs
are to be prepared with due consideration given to comprehensive long-range land
use schemes and social, economic, environmental, system performance and energy
conservation objectives which affect the future development of the metropolitan area.
To initiate and conduct an official urban transportation planninq process in the
Iowa City Urban Area, the following events or actions are necessary:
1. U.S. Census Bureau designation of the Iowa City Urban Area as a metropolitan
statistical area and receipt of appropriate documentation, including a map
showing the extent of the urbanized area.
COMMMSIONERS
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOIRES
-2-
2. Governor's designation of the 14PO responsible, together with the State,
for executing the 3-C planning process in conformance with federal and
state laws and policies.
3. Establishment of appropriate MPO transportation committee structure (e.g.,
Policy and technical and citizens advisory committees) and geographical
Identification of the urban transportation study area.
4. Execution of agreements between the:
(a) Iowa DOT and MPO to conduct a 3-C planning process and to provide
FHWA Metropolitan Planning(P�) and UMTA Section 8 Planning and
Technical Studies funds.
(b) MPO and A-95 agency (if they are not one and the same) to coordinate
their activities.
(c) MPO and publicly owned operators of mass transportation services to
cooperate in carrying out the .3-C planning process.
5. Establishment of the technical elements of the transportation planning
Process.
6. Development of a. prospectus and unified planning work program (UWP).
The prospectus sets out a multiyear 2-
work, whereas, the UWP annually ydescribes yall surban
�transpoework �tationnand
related -planning activities anticipated during the next 1 or 2 years
period.
7. Development and adoption of an urban transportation plan which consists
of the transportation system mananEment element (a short-range plan of
5-6 years) and the long-range element (a long-rarge plan of 20-25 years).
8. Preparation of a 5-6 year transportation improvement program (TIP)
.which includes projects derived from the short and long-range elements
Of the urban area transportation plan.
g. Certification of the 3-C urban transportation planning process. FHWA,
UMTA and the Iowa DOT annually review and evaluate this planning process
I for compliance with federal and state requirements.
10. Establishment of a continuing planning process (interfacing with the
adoption of an initial transportation plan and land use plan) which
ensures that the plan will reflect the area's transportation
as they change over time. needs
The conduct of an Iowa City Urban Area 3-C planning
financed by FHWA, UMTA and local governments participatingsinould the ProcesstlyThe
Iowa DOT would provide in-kind services in the form of technical assistance
and computer services for the operation of travel and air quality simulation
models. The Iowa DOT, at the request of the NPO, may furnish an urban transportation
Planner on a full-time basis to the MPO.
of this planners' salary would be paid by thenState randt80aPerccentabylthe3MP0.
A rough estimate of the 1978 Surface Transportation Act planning funds which would
IIICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES
i
I
1
j
I
I
i
i
,i
1
j
1
-3- n
be made available by FHWA and UMTA respectively are $12,000 and 520,000 Per
year for the 4 year period of the Act. These funds, administered by the'
Iowa DOT, would be annually allocated in part or in total to the MPO. The
amount of each year's allocation is based on planning work described in the
UWP and represents 80 percent of eligible expenditures. Payment for work
satisfactorily completed is on a reimbursement basis.
Enclosed is information concerning the urban transportation planning process
and the Iowa DOT Policy 820.02, "Urban Transportation Planning Assistance". Ne
will also send you, under separate cover, various federal documents relating to
the process. A two-part audio slide presertation concerning the technical and
non-technical aspects of the process can also be made available for your use.
Our staff would be happy to meet with you at some future date to discuss this
matter in more detail. Thank you for your interest, and please contact us if
we can be of further assistance.
OGW:ADS:ls
Enclosures
cc: C.I. MacGillivray
Ed Finn, FHWA
Bill Creger
Lee Benfield
Gus Anderson
Transit Division
Sincerely,
Donald G. Ward
Director
Office of Advance Planning
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOIRES
johnson county
Ole regional planning commission
I
® 29/2 south dubuque street, iowc city, i0wo 52240 (319)351-8556 Mary C Neuhauser c,, .
October 9, 1979
. TO: Iowa City City Council
Coralville City Council
County Board of Supervisors
FROM: Barry Hokanson
At its meeting of 10/3/79, the JCRPC Executive Board asked me to send
to you minutes (attached)
of the Board's meeting on September 26th.
At this meeting Keith Friese, transportation
planner, outlined a series
of suggestions concerning future planning
programs, problems and needs.
Keith offered his "Closing" comments
prior to takin a position with
the Grand Rapids (Michigan) Regional Transit
Authority.
in view of the vital issues involved in transportation planning, the
Board thought
you would be interested in the report of the discussion. 1
As you probably are aware, we are currently advertising for a replace- j
ment for Mr. Friese, with
an anticipated selection by the end of this'
i month.
I
I
I
' I
r.
1 (.
i
j I
i
i
i
r9�6
MICROFILMED BY
I JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES
I`
1
® johnson county
® regional planning commission
. croceism
® Z'/2 south dubuque street, iowc city, bwo 52240 (319)351.8556 Mory CNeuhauser
10/3/79
EXECUTIVE BOARD
Wednesday, September 26, 1979
4:00 P.M.
First Christian Church - Basement
Iowa City, IA 52240
PRESENT: Isabel Turner, Mary Neuhauser, Herbert Jordan, J. Patrick White,
David Perret
ABSENT:. David Roberts, Don Sehr, William Stewart, James Stehbens
OTHERS: Barry Hokanson, Dixie Collins, Keith Friese, News Media
The meeting was called to order by Ms. Neuhauser
(M) 1) MINUTES
Moved by Perret, seconded by Jordan to approve the minutes of the
Executive Board meeting of 9/12/79 as corrected. Motion carried.
2) CORRESPONDENCE
Mr. Hokanson reported that two A -95's had been received from ECICOG
with action required before the ECICOG Board meeting on September
27th.
City of Cedar Rapids - Airport Apron
Mr. Hokanson explained that the project would construct a concrete
apron at the Cedar Rapids Municipal Airport as the first stage of
a new terminal, as provided in the Airport Master Plan which had
previously been approved by JCRPC..
(M) Moved by White, seconded by Turner to request a deferral so that
members of the Regional Airport System Study Committee could be
notified of the project with an opportunity for comment. Motion
passed.
Linn County Regional Planning Commission - TIP/TSM Plan
Mr. Hokanson explained the proposal which includes an outline of
major street, highway and transit projects for the Cedar Rapids
urbanized area.
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES FIOIIIES
i
Mr
8
Executive Board
Minutes
Page 2
Mr. Friese distributed a letter from IDOT giving tentative approval
to the combined transit grant for the four Johnson County systems
under Section IS of the Federal Mass Transportation Assistance Act,
in the amount of $347,600. Mr. Friese said this letter would clear
the way for final UMTA approval of the related Section 3 grant.
(M) Moved by Turner, seconded by White to forward without comment.
Motion passed.
Ms. Turner requested that quarterly financial reports be sent out
to Board members as they had in the past.
3) DISCUSSION OF FUTURE TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ACTIVITIES
Mr. Keith Friese discussed the position of Transportation Planner
and the emphasis he thought should be taken with this program.
Mr. Friese said he felt there is a need for a policy decision on
planning programs in the future, particularly the question of whether
JCRPC will continue the strong emphasis on transit coordination.
I. He said that with the current staffing level, there will be heavy
demands on the Transportation Planner.
He suggested that the Board keep in mind that when this area, as
an SMSA, develops a certified 3-C process, it will have to have a
balanced program for both transit and the street/highway system.
Ms. Neuhauser said she felt the staff should assemble a specific
description of the 3-C planning process so that the members under-
stand why it will be necessary to have more than one person in
transportation planning.
Mr. Friese said that if transportation planning continues to
emphasize the transit components, the person hired by the Commission
should have a strong background in that area and have experience in
dealing with the area wide transportation process.
Ms. Turner.asked if there would be another transit grant application
for next year. Mr. Friese replied that there may be no Section 3
funds for three or four years, but that state operating assistance
and Section 5 funds would be available.
Mr. Ferret said he felt the Commission needed to clarify the status
of the Area Transportation Study so that officials would understand
the need for additional staffing.
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES
Executive Board
Minutes
Page 3
There was a discussion of funding for fiscal year 1981. Mr.
Hokanson explained that FY '81 will likely be a "dry" year for
funds but that the situation would improve dramatically in
FY '82 with the receipt of $30,000 to $40,000 in transportation
planning assistance.
Mr. Friese expressed concern over the transportation planning
relationship between JCRPC and Johnson County. He said one
recurring problem is the lack of a definitive policy of the
division of responsibilities among agencies. He noted that local
officials clearly recognize JCRPC as the agent for transportation
planning whereas the Iowa DOT identifies ECICOG as the :osponsible
unit with pass-through of some tasks to JCRPC. Mr. Friese
explained that this division becomes particularly complex con-
cerning the Johnson County SEATS system, because of its being
treated as one of the multi -county "rural" systems rather than
one of four coordinated operations in this county.
Mr. White agreed that the "rural" label commonly attached to the
SEATS system tends to aggravate the confusion of roles. He
suggested that there should be wider recognition of SEATS as a
"specialized" transit provider (elderly and handicapped) with a
majority of its clients residing in the urban area.
Mr. Friese discussed the role of JCRPC in coordinating transit
operations. He stressed the substantial demands on staff time to
assist the four separate transit systems. He suggested there
should be increased attention to the potential of transit con-
solidation, as suggested in the recent update of the Transit
Development Program. He noted that UMTA would likely be concerned
with the current arrangements at such time as federal section 5
operating subsidies are sought.
There was discussion of a joint transit maintenance facility as a
first step toward consolidation. Mr. Friese stressed the long-
term impacts of a capital investment such as a new transit garage
which may be built by one of the systems, thus impeding moves
toward consolidation. He noted that the transit operators had
discussed the advantages of a near -downtown site, in the vicinity
of the present CAMBUS garage. He observed that such a site would
require inter -agency cooperation and a higher level of political
commitment to the objectives of consolidation.
Mr. Friese briefly discussed the pending work on transit grants,
the future application for state transit assistance, and compliance
with the new 11504" handicapped access regulations.
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 1401IIES
f
i
it
c..
1.
j,
1
1
I
1
)
I
I
1
I
1
I'
i
'I
9i
i
Executive Board ,
jMinutes
Page 4
I
The Board members repeated their previous compliments to Mr.
Friese on his work for the Commission and wished him well in his
new position with the Grand Rapids (Michigan) Area Transit
Authority.
(M) 4) BILLS FOR APPROVAL -
Moved by*Perret, seconded by White to approve the bills as sub-
mitted. Motion passed.
5) CONTINUED DISCUSSION ON EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR APPLICATIONS
There was discussion of schedules for interviewing Mr. Hokanson as
one of the candidates for the position. Arrangements were made for
informal contacts'with members of the Executive Board and other
public officials.
6) ADJOURNMENT
Meeting adjourned at approximately 5:45 P.M.
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES IIOIIIES
Johnson c unty
regional planning commission
—,9/2 South dubuque street, iowa city. Iowa 52240 (319)351.8556
October 12, 1979
TO: Iowa City Council
FROM: Pam Ramser
RE: Agency Information in This Week's Packet
update on Remainder of Budget Hearing Schedule
Mary C Meuhouser cn,,c �
In this week's packet you will find summaries of funding requests, as
follows:
October 11 - Goodwill Industries
Johnson County Association for Retarded Citizens
October 18 - Hillcrest Family Services - Iowa City Residence
for Women
Lutheran Social Service
Iowa City Crisis Intervention Center
Crisis Center Transient Program
Please note the following changes in agency scheduling:
Rape Victim Advocacy Program has been rescheduled for
Thursday, November 8th at 7:00 p.m.
Aid and Alternatives for Victims of Spouse Abuse has
been rescheduled for Thursday, November 8th at 9:30 p.m.
The schedule for October 18 through November 8 now is as follows:
October 18
7:00 p.m. Hillcrest Family Services - Iowa City Residence
for Women
7:30 p.m. Lutheran Social Service
8:15 p.m. Crisis Center
Crisis Center Transient Program
FIICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES
1977
r-.
Memorandum to Iowa City Council
October 12, 1979
Page 2
October 25
7:00 p.m. American Red Cross
7:45 p.m. Salvation Army
8:30 p.m. Joint meeting of Red Cross and Salvation Army
9:00 p.m. Willow Creek Neighborhood Center
* THERE IS NO HEARING SCHEDULED FOR NOVEMBER 1.*
November 8
7:00 p.m. Rape Victim Advocacy Program
7:30 p.m. Visiting Nurse Association
8:30 p.m. Free Medical Clinic
9:00 p.m. HACAP Head Start Preschool Center
9:30 p.m. Aid and Alternatives for Victims of Spouse Abuse
There will be at least one, possibly two, final wrap-up sessions to
review agencies' hearings and funding requests. These will be scheduled
for November 15th (and sometime early in December if a second is needed.)
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 11011IES
i
"• October 11, 1979
Hearings
FUNDING REQUEST
SUMMARY SHEET
Goodwill Industries of Southeast Iowa
- - Request 1979 minus 1978 1980 minus 1979
SOURCE 1978 1979 1980 + or (-)/4 Change + or (-)/4 Change
United Way* $ 26,000 $ 26,000 $ 33,916 $ -0- -- $ 7,916 + 30.48
TOTAL INCOME. $615,794 $606,250 $662,138 ($ 9,544)- 1.5 $55,888 + 9.24
-Carryover $ 16,072 $ 42,746** $ 26,728 $26,674 + 166.0 ($16,018) - 37.54
TOTAL $$ AVAILABLE $631,865 $648,996 $688,866 $17,131 + 2.7 $39,870 + 6.14
TOTAL EXPENSES $554,522 $622,268 $676,331 $67,746 + 12.2 $54,063 + 8.74
(Major Categories)
-Management $160,470 $213,890 $214,789
$53,420 + 33.3 $ 899- + 0.44
-Solicitation & Transp. $ 51,956 $ 35,413 $ 65,180 ($16,543)- 31.8 $29,767 + 84.14
-Food Service $ 15,785 $ 21,106 $ 20,133 $ 5,311 + 33.6 ($ 973) - 4.64
-Rehabilitation $112,910 $136,282 $151,345 $23,372 + 20.7 $15,063 + 11.14
-Contract . $ 82,768 $112,019 $137,259 $29,251 + 35.3 $25,240 + 22.54
-Store $ 27,385 $ 27,018 $ 37,501 ($ 367)- 1.3 $10,483 + 38.84
-Contrib. Goods Produc. $ 27,851 $ 68,653 $ 39,782 $40,802 + 146.5 ($28,87].) - 45.24
-Salvage
$ 5,878 $ 7,013 $ 3,842 $ 1,135 + 19.3 ($ 3,171) - 45.24
* The amounts shown on Budget Form 1, Line 2a include allocations/requests from both Linn
County and Johnson County United Ways. The amounts shown here are for Johnson County
only.
** This figure is that given on Budget Form 1 as the 1979 beginning balance; the 1978
ending balance is given as $77,343. Goodwill is looking into the reason for this
discrepancy.
MAJOR BUDGETARY CHANGES FROM 1979 TO 1980
OPERATING EXPENSES
I Salaries $26,623 increase** (+ 6.54)
Emp. Benefits $10,500 increase (+99,14)
Professional Fees $ 2,350 increase (+28.84)
Insurance (bldg. & Propty) $ 2,500 increase (+33.34)
Repairs & Maintenance $ 4,600 increase (+65.74)
Postage & Shipping $ 400 increase (+25.04)
Supplies $ 3,600 increase (+ 9.84)
Transportation $ 4,965 increase (+39.14)
Conferences & Mtgs.. $ 500 increase (+50.04)
Memb. Dues or Assessments $ 4,514 increase (+66.54)
SEATS $13,200 increase (+16504)
I
These represent $73,752 of a $77,232 TOTAL INCREASE in OPERATING EXPENSES.
(Over)
PIICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES F10111ES
Goodwill Industries of Soui ast Iowa
Page 2
i11
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
Property Acquisition ($13,000) decrease (-72.28)
Equipment Acquisition ($ 3,125) decrease to -0- for 1980
Depreciation on Equipment ($ 2,000) decrease (- 6.98)
TOTAL DECREASE of $18,125 in CAPITAL EXPENDITURES.
INCOME
Beginning Balance ($16,018) decrease (-37.58)
Contrib. Toward Op. Expenses $ 500 increase (+25.08)
Alloc. by Fed. Fundraising
Orgs. (excluding J.C. United
Way) $ 7,107 increase (+56.38)
Fees + Grants from Gov't
Agencies (excluding I.C. +
U.C.) $41,000 increase (+13.58)
Sale of Materials & Services
to Public $ 9,000 increase (+,3.68)
TOTAL INCREASE in INCOME is $57,607 (all shown above).
EITHER PROGRAM AND BUDGET INFORMATION
-Income from funds restricted by donor has decreased markedly:
$74,590 in 1978
$14,250 in 1979 (estimated)
$ 2,000 in 1980 (projected)
Goodwill indicates that $13,950 or nearly all of donor -restricted income for 1979
went toward mortgage retirement; the entire $2,000 projected for 1980 will also
go toward this.
-Staff/client ratio is: 1:3 (total staff)
1:5 (direct service staff only)
-Goodwill served 193 persons in Johnson County during 1978 and 26 persons in Linn
County as well.
-The following per day costs per client are given:
Work Adjustment Training $13.29
Activity Center $16.07
Extended Work Experience $12.14
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOFIlES
a e
Goodwill industries Of Southeast Iowa
Page 3
-Two of the recommendations of the Human Services Study on Disabilities addressed
employment for handicapped persons:
1) It was found that job opportunities for the competitively employable
disabled are insufficient to meet demand; it was recommended that
employers be educated regarding employment of handicapped persons
and that promotion of the need for such job opportunities be done in
conjunction with this.
2) Especially relevant to Goodwill is the need found for a long-term,
full-time program of sheltered employment to better serve clients'
occupational needs and to better prepare them for participation in
the work force; it was recommended that the specific needs and costs
for expanding Goodwill's capabilities to include such a program be
explored and the most appropriate funding sources then pursued.
AMENDMENTS TO BUDGET INFORMATION
-The 1978 ending balance ($77,343.18) is about $35,000 higher than the 1979
beginning balance ($42,745.64). Goodwill is looking into this.
-The amount of restricted monies unused one year does not agree with restricted
carryover shown in the following year, e.g., for 1978 to 1979:
1978
� 1979
lb. Restricted carryover $ 3,673.40
$12,564.69
4a. Restricted support
5. TOTAL Restricted $ $74,590.15
$78,263.55
7b. Restricted Expenditures -$63,894.51
ENDING BALANCE $14,369.04
I
There is also a discrepancy in restricted carryover from 1979 to 1980 (1979
ENDING BALANCE = $2,596.06; 1980 BEGINNING BALANCE = $3,825.40).
Goodwill is looking into this.
-The amounts given for TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE and TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES on Form
1 (Line 6 and Line 7, respectively) and Form 3 (Line 16 and Line 38, respectively)
do not agree, as follows:
1979 1980
FUNDS AVAILABLE
Form 1, Line 6 $648,995.64 $688,866.01
Form 3, Line 16 $611,360.34
OPERATING EXPENSES Form 1, Line 7 $652,950.01
$622,267.63
Form 3, Line 38 $599,099.00
Goodwill is also looking into this.
(over)
i
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
1 CEDAR RAPIDS -DES FIORIES
I
Goodwill Industries of Southeast Iowa
Page 4
i
-The amount given for salaries to he paid in 1979 is different on Budget Form
3 than the amount shown on Form 4:
Form 3 - $406,977.00
Form 4 - $375,114.32
It is noted that the Form 3 amount is based on the revised 1979 budget, while
the Form 4 amount is an estimate based on present knowledge of vacancies.
Therefore, the Form 4 figure would appear to be the more accurate of the two
and, if used in determining total budget (per Form 3), would revise the budget
downward by nearly $34,000.
M amended Form 1 will be prepared and submitted.
Pam Ramser
JCRPC
10-10-79
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOVIES
October 11, 1979
Hearings
FUNDING REQUEST
' SUMMARY SHEET
Johnson County Association For
Retarded Citizens
SOURCERequest Col. 2 minus 1 Col. 3 minus 2
1978 1979 1980 + or (-)/% Change + or (-)/% Change
United Way $ 7,300 $ 6,000 $16,200*
($ 1,300)- 17.8 $10,200 + 170.0
Johnson County* $ -- $ 11,031****
$12,000 $ -- $ 969 + 8.9
TOTAL LOCAL $$ .$ 7,300 $ 17,031$28,200 $ 9,731 + 133.3 $11,169 + 39.6
- TOTAL INCOME $ 87,631 $60,900 $76,953 + 720.7**
-Carryover $10,678 *** ($26,731)- 30.5
Y $45,096 $ 35,965 $ 4,035 ($ 9,131)- 20.2 ($31,930)- 88.8
TOTAL $$ AVAILABLE $55,774 $123,596 $64,935 $67,822 + 121.6 $58,661 - 47.5
TOTAL EXPENSES $19,809 $119,561** $63,100 $99,752 + 503.6
($56,461)- 47.2
j
(Major Categories)
-Management $ 650
$ 3,200 $ 7,200 $ 2,550 + 392.3 $ 4,000 + 125.0
-Family support $ 5,500 $ 3,500
$ 4,150 ($ 2,000)- 36.4 $ 650 + 18.6
-Community Awareness $ -- $ 1,000 $ 4,805 $ __ $ 3,805 + 380.5
-Friends Program $ -- $ 500 $ 1,605 $
-Advocac S 1,105 + 221.0
Y $ -- $ 500 $ 1,160 $ -- $ 660 + 132.0
-Sports Day$ Soo $ 500 $ 775 $ -o-
$ 275 + 55.0
-Summary Program $ $ 12,531 $13,000 $
$ 469 + 3.7
i -Nelson Adult Ctr. $ -- $ 23,300 $31,600 $
1 i -Payment to Affil. $ 8,300 + 35.6
Organizations $ 3,700 $ 4,245 $ 4,300 $ 545 + 14.7 $ 55 + 1.3
{
* 1979 request from United Way was $12,031; 1980 request thus represents a $4,169, or
34.68 increase over the 1979 request.
1 ** This amount is included on Line 4a (Form 1) of the Calendar Year forms, instead of
being shown on Line 2c. All Johnson County money is restricted to the summer program.
1 *** These figures represent such a great increase over previous and subsequent years
i because they include $50,000 in CDBG (Block Grant) funds from the City of Iowa City
i for the Nelson Adult Center.
I i !
(over)
---..-,-.._-.,....-
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 110IBES
Johnson County Association f' \Retarded Citizens
Page 2
MAJOR BUDGETARY CHANGES FROM 1970 to 1980
OPERATING EXPENSES
Salaries $ 4,000 'increase* (+125.06)
Mortgage Payments $12,300 increase (+100.06)
Bldg. & Property Insurance $ 1,000 increase (+100.06)
Printing & Publications $ 125 increase (+ 26.36)
Conferences & Meetings $ 200 increase (new expense)
Repairs & Maint. (Prop'ty) ($ 5,000) decrease (- 50.06)
These represent $12,625 of a $13,439 TOTAL INCREASE in OPERATING EXPENSES.
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
i
Property Acquisition ($70,000) decrease to -0- in 1980
INCOME
I
Gannett Grant & Gifts ($ 3,000) decrease (- 75.06)
Community Block Grant ($50,000) decrease to -0- in 1980
Investment Income ($ 500) decrease (- 62.56)
U of I Rent $13,800 increase (+ 50.06)
Bummer Program (Johnson Co.) $ 969 increase (+ 8.86)
These represent all of a $38,731 decrease in TOTAL INCOME (excluding J.C. United Way).
NOTE: It is projected that the organization's beginning balance will be depleted
by $31,930, or 88.86, from January, 1979 to January, 1980. This will leave
a balance of $4,035.
OTHER PROGRAM AND BUDGET INFORMATION
-Donated Services listed will total a projected equivalent of $13,300 this year
and $12,600 in 1980. These donated services include administrative, legal, and
clerical services, as well as transportation for the Summer Program.
j
-The agency has one paid staff person (Chris Franson, Executive Director) who
has been working 3/8 -time; her position will increase to 1/2 -time in 1980.
j -Johnson County ARC served approximately 1,000 Johnson Co=ty residents during
1978; this compares to 200-250 persons served during 1977, as reported on last
year's form..
1
-Fees charged are: $2/day minimum for emergency care (sliding scale).
$3/day minimum for respite care (slidtmg scale).
$100 maximum (sliding scale) for Summer Program.
i
i
i
MICROFILMED BY
i JORM MICROLAB
I CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MONIES
1
Johnson County Association for Retarded Citizens
Page 3
j -See GOALS & OBJECTIVES forms for specific information on the agency's programs.
i
-The Human Services Study on Disabilities addressed the following areas of need
which are relevant to the ARC's programs:
a. Public Education
A need was found for education of the community as to the nature, effects,
and other specifics of handicapping conditions, particularly education
through the schools and education of employees. The A1RC's Community Awareness
program is working to address this need (with a focus on mental retardation).
b. Information on Services
A need was found for a better system of disseminating information on services
in the area for handicapped persons through several media. The ARC publishes
a brochure "Here to serve" which furthers the meeting of this need.
c. Day Care
A need for more options for day care for handicapped persons was found by the
study. The ARC is involved in helping to meet this need through its involve-
i ment with the Nelson Adult Center, particularly through securing Community
Development Block Grant monies for the Center.
AMENDMENTS TO BUDGET INFORMATION
Calendar Year Forms
Form 1, Line 4 (1979) should be $80,131
1 Pam Ramser
•� JCRPC
F 10-10-79
i
i
i
1 i
i
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 140111ES
B
_ October 18, 1979
Hearings
FUNDING REQUEST
SUMMARY SHEET
Hillcrest Family Services - Iowa City Residence For Women
* Fiscal year used by the program is November 1 - October 31, therefore, FY '79 is
November 1, 1977 through October 31, 1978.
MAJOR BUDGETARY CHANGES FROM FY 179 TO FY '80
EXPENSES
salaries $3,827 increase (+7.08)
This represents.most of a $5,500 TOTAL INCREASE in OPERATING EXPENSES.
INCOME
Fees and Grants (not including J.C.)
-includes residents' fees, allocations
by other counties and states $2,254 increase (+6.08)
This represents the entire increase in income (not including that from Johnson County)
OTHER PROGRAM AND BUDGET INFORMATION
-Staff/client ratio is 5:7, with no more than 2 staff on duty at any given time.
-Nine persons in Johnson County were served by the program during 1978.
-Fees are charged in the following manner: "depending on arrangements made
between the county and the client, the client may be asked to donate 1/4
of her net income toward maintenance."
IIICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 110INES
(over)
FY 79 minus FY 78
FY 80 minus FY 79
SOURCE
FY '78*
£Y !79*
FY '80*
+ or (-)/8
Change
+
or (-)/8
Change
Johnson County
$43,570
$46,134
$54,000
$ 2,564
+
5.98
$
7,866
+
17.1%
TOTAL INCOME
$79,446
$83,880
$94,000
$ 4,434
+
5.68
$10,120
+
12.18
-Carryover
-0-
$ 4,620
-0-
$ 4,620
--
($
4,620)
-
100.08
TOTAL $$ AVAILABLE
$79,446
$88,500
$94,000
$ 9,054
+
11.48
$
5,500
+
6.28
TOTAL EXPENSES
$74,826
$88,500
$94,000
$13,674
+
18.38
$
5,500
+
6.28
(Major Categories
-Management
$10,968
$12,492
$13,366
$ 1,524
+
13.98
$
874
+
7.08
-I.C. Residence Pgm.
$63,858
$76,008
$80,634
$12,150
+
19.08
$
4,626
+
6.18
* Fiscal year used by the program is November 1 - October 31, therefore, FY '79 is
November 1, 1977 through October 31, 1978.
MAJOR BUDGETARY CHANGES FROM FY 179 TO FY '80
EXPENSES
salaries $3,827 increase (+7.08)
This represents.most of a $5,500 TOTAL INCREASE in OPERATING EXPENSES.
INCOME
Fees and Grants (not including J.C.)
-includes residents' fees, allocations
by other counties and states $2,254 increase (+6.08)
This represents the entire increase in income (not including that from Johnson County)
OTHER PROGRAM AND BUDGET INFORMATION
-Staff/client ratio is 5:7, with no more than 2 staff on duty at any given time.
-Nine persons in Johnson County were served by the program during 1978.
-Fees are charged in the following manner: "depending on arrangements made
between the county and the client, the client may be asked to donate 1/4
of her net income toward maintenance."
IIICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 110INES
(over)
Hillcrest Family Services - iowa City Residence For Women
Page 2
-In regard to complaints that the service is not provided to men, Ann Lundquist,
Program Director, notes that Johnson County Department of Social Services keeps
a count of such requests, and that there are currently no plans to provide this
service for men, as apparently the need is not great enough.
-The program has seven staff persons and a total of 4.35 fulltime equivalents.
-It may be noted that statistics cited in the Human Services study on Mental
Health (11/77) show that women comprise 65% of all clients being seen by mental
health programs; in contrast the study cites the fact that men comprise 80% of
substance abuse, treatment clients and 908 of those persons in correctional
i
facilities and programs.
j
-The need for a halfway house for men returning from psychiatric treatment
centers was brought to the attention of the Human Services staff but there was
insufficient information uport which to base a recommendation for such a
program.
AMENDMENTS TO BUDGET INFORMATION
None.
i
i
i
Pam Ramser
JCRPC
10-11-79
i
i
i
1
� I
I I
i
i
i-
i
i
i
j
I
i-
�
FIICROFILMED BY
I
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES I10IIIES
October 18, 1979
Hearings
OTHER INFORMATION ON BUDGET AND PROGRAMS
Funding is being requested from Johnson County United Way
Programs.
for two
FUNDING REQUEST
'
Family and Individual Counseling
Counseling With Expectant Single Parents
2/1/78-1/31/79 1980_ Budget
` SUMMARY SHEET
Number Served 19 Brief Service 42 Cases
40 Est'd Cases
Lutheran Social Service
of Iowa
450
Cost/Unit
+ 5.1%
SOURCE
United Way
INCO2+D;
EXPENSES
1978
$ 8,000
$1,229,367
$ 126,257
$1,355,624
$1,194,004
Request
1979 1980
$1,463,0
$ 161,6$
$ 8,0ma$$
$1,624,6$268,996
$1,463,0$268,996
1979 minus 1978
+ or (-)/$ Chane
-0- __S
$233,633 + 19.0$118,300
35,363 + 28.0TOTAL$$AVAILABLE
+ 19.8
+ 22.5
1980 minus
+ or (-)/9
1,000 +
+
$118,300 +
$118,300 +
1979
Chan
12.5TOTAL
8.1-Cazryaver
7.3TOTAL
8.1
OTHER INFORMATION ON BUDGET AND PROGRAMS
Funding is being requested from Johnson County United Way
Programs.
for two
Counseling With Expectant Single Parents
'
Family and Individual Counseling
Counseling With Expectant Single Parents
2/1/78-1/31/79 1980_ Budget
%change
Number Served 19 Brief Service 42 Cases
40 Est'd Cases
Units of Service(Case Hrs) 428
450
Cost/Unit
+ 5.1%
$25.87 $27.93
TOTAL Service Cost
+.8.09
$11,072 $12,569
+13.59
Family and Individual Counseling
2/1/78-1/31�7g 1980 Budget
echancZe
Number Served 39 Brief Service 100 Cases
112 Est'd Cases
Units of Service(Case Hrs) 1,126
1,000
Cost/Unit
-3.1.2e
$21.09 $23.80
TOTAL Service Cost $23,747
+12.8a
$23,800
+ 0.28
(Over)
hfICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES IIOIIIES
Lutheran Social Service of Iowa
Page 2
i
i
$8,500 of the request from United Way would go to Family Counseling;
$500 to Counseling With Expectant Single Parents.
-Staff/client ratio is about 1:30.
Pam Pamser
JCRPC
10-11-79
I
i
4
f
1
1
j
i v
r
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 1401IIES
* United Way allocation/request is given on a calendar year basis; all other figures are
for July -July fiscal year.
MAJOR BUDGETARY CHANGES FROM FY 80 to FY 81
EXPENSES
Salaries $1,815 increase (+ 7.0%)
Rent $1,200 increase (+33.38)
Repairs & Maint. ($1,000) decrease (-90,94)
Financial Asst.
to Individuals ($ 120) decrease (-23.14)
These represent $1,895 toward a $2,448 TOTAL INCREASE in OPERATING EXPENSES.
(over)
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES IIORIES
October 18,
1979
FUNDING REQUEST
Hearings
SUMMARY SHEET
Iowa City Crisis Intervention Center
SOURCE
United Way
Iowa City
1978/FY79* 1979/FY80*1980/FY81*
$11,100 $13,000 $13,520
-- $ 51000 $ 5,350__
+Cor 2 minus 1
(-)/8 Change
$1,900 + 17.14
$5,000
Col. 3 minus 2
+ or (-)/a Change
$ 520 + 4.7%
$ 320 + 6.48
Johnson County
$21,273
$14,600
$16,522
($6,673=,48
$1,922
+ 13.28
TOTAL LOCAL $$
.$32,273
$32,600
$35,392
$ 327 +
1.04
$2,792
+ 8.68
TOTAL INCOME
$39,414
$39,776
$43,322
$ 362 +
0.94
$3,546
+ 8.98
-Carryover
$ 2,392
$ 4,831
$ 2,812
$2,439 +102.08
($2,019)
- 41.88
TOTAL $$ AVAILABLE
TOTAL EXPENSES
(Major Categories)
$41,806
$36,975
$44,607
$41,785
$46,134
$44,167
$2,801 +
$4,820 +
6.78
13.08
$1,527
$2,372
+ 3.48
+ 5.78
-Management
-Crisis Intervention
-Food Bank
-Community Educ.
-Counseling Ser. To
$27,377
$ 4,253
$ 1,381
$ 1,379
$29,124
$ 6,987
$ 1,469
$ 1,466
$30,850
$ 7,296
$1,556
$1,553
$1,747 +
$2,734 +
$ 88 +
$ 87 +
6.48
64.38
6.48
6.3%
$1,726
$ 309
$ 87
$ 87
+ S.9a
+4.48
+ 5.98
+ 5.98
Transients
$ 2,585
$ 2,749
$2,912
$ 164 +
6.38
$ 163
+ 5.98
* United Way allocation/request is given on a calendar year basis; all other figures are
for July -July fiscal year.
MAJOR BUDGETARY CHANGES FROM FY 80 to FY 81
EXPENSES
Salaries $1,815 increase (+ 7.0%)
Rent $1,200 increase (+33.38)
Repairs & Maint. ($1,000) decrease (-90,94)
Financial Asst.
to Individuals ($ 120) decrease (-23.14)
These represent $1,895 toward a $2,448 TOTAL INCREASE in OPERATING EXPENSES.
(over)
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES IIORIES
a t
Iowa City Crisis Intervent Center
Page 2
INCOME
Contrib. Toward Op. Expenses $154 increase (+ 4.78)
Assessments from Local Member Units $505 increase (+126.38)
Fees & Grants (not including IC & JC) $130 increase (+ 4.9%)
Sale of Materials (Training Manuals) ($ 50) decrease to $0
These represent $739 toward a $745 TOTAL INCREASE in INCOME.
OTHER PROGRAM AND BUDGET INFORMATION
-Paid staff is comprised of 3 persons, with a total of 2.5 fulltime equivalents.
-$750 of United Way's 1980 allocation is designated for use as match money for
a University of. Iowa Work Study student's salary during Fy 181. ($3,000 from
Work Study).
i-Services donated by Crisis Center volunteers are valued at $103,080 for 1979,
with the same being projected for 1980.
The greatest number of volunteer hours are devoted to Crisis Counseling
(10,950 hours/year) and On -Call (8,760 hours/year).A
pproximte3,00
hours/year are devoted to each of the following: Suicide Lineaandy
-Staff client ratio is 1:3,060 (Paid Staff)
j 10:612 (Volunteers)
-4,896 persons were served during 1978 unduplicated count arrived at by
following formula:
6,120 total contacts
- 1,224 (208 of total contacts)
4,896. Persons served
-The Crisis Center mentions the following measures it would take to alleviate
complaints regarding services:
1) utilize paid staff & practicum students to cover hours which have
been somewhat inconsistent in coverate (i.e., 7:30 a.m.-9:00 a.m.).
2) increase on-going skills training of volunteers.
3) make more frequent updates of referral information.
-See GOALS and OBJECTIVES for more specific information on programs.
i
-The Crisis Center is involved in providing assistance for a number of areas
of need addressed in the Human Services Studies (on Juvenile Justice,
Emergency Assistance to Transients, Emergency Assistance to Residents, in
particular). The following programs address specific needs mentioned in the
studies:
a. Transient Counseling - The need for counseling, shelter, transportation,
and food for transients was cited by the Study on Emergency Assistance
FIICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES
Iowa Cit Crisis Intervent'
Page ,3 '�1 Center
i
to Transients. For further
discussion, see FUNDING REQUEST SUMMARY
SHEET on Crisis Center T
to Transients Study, ransient Program and Emergency
Assistance
b. Food Bank Pro The need for emergency financial assistance (for
food, shelter, utilities, etc.
was the number o ) after regular 8 to 5 business hours
ne priority need found by the Study on Emergency
Assistance to Residents. The need
critical of the above needsfor food was cited as the most
, and the establishment of a local food
Pantry was recommended to meet this need,
AMENDMENTS TO BUDGET INFORMATION
None.
.Pam Ramser
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES M0114ES
n
1—
M a
I
FIICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES II01NE5
October
18, 1979
!
Hearings
FUNDING
REQUEST
SUMMARY SHEET
I
Crisis Center
Transient Program
SOURCE 1978/FY 79* 1979Fy gp•
/FY
United Way $2,000 $2,000
I Iowa City $3,000 $2,500
TOTAL LOCAL $$ $5,000 $4,500
TOTAL INCOME $9,032 $9,075
-Carryover $ 848 $ 193
TOTAL $$ AVAILABLE $9,880 $9,268
TOTAL EXPENSES $9,688 $9,268
(Major Categories)
Request
1980/FY 81*_+
$2,080
$3,000
$5,080
$9,900
$ -_
$9,900
$9,900
Col. 2 minus 1
or (-)/8 Chan e
-0- --
($500) - 16.78
($500) - 10.08
$ 43 + 0.58
($655) - 77.28
($612) - 6.28
(.5420) - 4.38
Col.
+ or
$ 80
$500
$580
$825
($193)
$632
$632
3 minus 2
(-)/$ Change
+ 4.08
+ 20.08
+ 12.98
+ 9.1%
- 100.08
+ 6.88
+ 6.88
-Management. $1,387
-Payments to Affil.
-$ 868.
$ 795
($519) -
37.48
($ 73)
- 8.48
Organizations. $ --
-Direct Services to
$ 400
$ 905
$400
--
$505
+ 126.38
Transients $8,301
.. ,.
$8,000
$8,200
($301). -
3.68
$200
+ 2.58
* United Way allocation/request is given on calendar year
July -July fiscal year.
basis; all
other figures
are for
MAJOR BUDGETARY CHANGES FROM FY 80 TO Fy 81
j EXPENSES.
Rent
Postage & Shipping. -
$360 increase
$ 50 increase
(+133.38)
(+100.08)
I! These represent $410 of a $633
TOTAL INCREASE
in OPERATING
EXPENSES.
I INCOME
Contributions Toward
Operating Expenses
Fees + Grants (not
$195 increase
(+ 4.88)
including I.C. or J.C.)
$ 50 increase
(+ 10.08)
These represent the entire $245
and Iowa City).
TOTAL INCREASE
in INCOME (excluding
United
Way
i
(over)
FIICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES II01NE5
-
Crisis Center Transient Program
Page 2
OTHER PROGRAM AND BUDGET INFORMATION
-During 1979, services estimated to be worth $9,339.72 were donated by the
Crisis Center; this includes 2,135 hours from Crisis Center volunteers and
156 hours from the Center's Assistant Director, Pat Meyer.
The number of hours donated by the Center will remain the same for volunteers
in 1980 and will double for the Assistant Director (Total Worth = $10,137.00).
-During 1979, materials valued at $374.55 were donated by the Crisis Center
to the program, including utilities, liability insurance, general supplies,
maintenance, and equipment rental; the value of donated materials will
decrease to $261.60.
-The staff/client ratio for the program is:
1:404 (Paid Staff)
.1:8 (Volunteers)
-The program served 808 persons during 1978.
-See COALS 6 OBJECTIVES statement for more specific information.
-In 1977, the Human Services Project conducted a study on Emergency Assistance
to Transients. This study explored the history and current status of these
services. After Wesley House discontinued its program of transient housing
in the fall of 1977, anad hoc committee was formed to find a solution to the
need for continued hosuing and related services to transients. The Crisis
Center staited its program as a temporary solution (until a more permanent
and complete program could be started) and is continuing it as no other program
has been started.
More detailed information information may be found in the study on Emergency
Assistance to Transients and in the files of the Human Services Project.
AMENDMENTS TO BUDGET INFORMATION
FISCAL YEAR BUDGET FORM 1, Line la (FY 79) - The amount here should be $848.51.
Pam Ramser
JCRPC
10-11-79
FIICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES IIOIIIES
c
G
i _ ° Community'fochnology
wlniliulives Program
Helping
Small Communities
Take Advantage of
Technology
°Kaon L'4Eo C•
JORM MICROLAB
rt 7sra�,`tlgr.: ,
A Technology Transft---System
he Communily'rechnology Initiatives Program
(CrIP) is an organized response to the need for
technical help expressed by smaller jurisdictions of
the nation. It is a technology utilization system — a
people -to -people network focusing on jurisc8ctions with
populations of 50,000 or less. Structurally, CI1P
consists of:
■ Local governments representing seven regional
circuits across the U.S., which receive on-site
technical assistance and set overall C IP policy;
■ Seven technology agents or circuit riders, each
supplying a single circuit of several jurisdictions
with technical assistance;
■ Seven Federal Laboratories contributing the ser-
vices of the technology agents and providing
them with technical backup;
■ The ready -technology resources of the National
Science Foundation's science and technology net-
works, the 187 -member laboratories of the
Federal Laboratory Consortium, and the Exten-
sion Service of the U.S. Department of Agricul-
ture
■ Management by Public Technology, Inc., in
association and cooperation with the National
League of Cities and the International City
Management Association.
Why CT1P was Established
CrOP was established in 1077 because:
Increasingly governmental policy planning, decision-
making, and public service delivery are shaped by
science and technology, and
Many small local governments lack the money and
staff to meet the demands of their localities. These
demands impact local governmen Is throughout the
country with respect to such issues ns fuel shortages.
waste water treatment, financial reporting and track-
ing, street maintenance, solid waste management, and
water quality.
CPIP helps small local government meet the require-
mants of science and technology and lake full
advantage of opportunities afforded by science and
technology for service improvement and cost control.
What CT1P Offers Small Governments
■ A forum to identify and address priority problems
and needs of small governments.
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOIIIES
■ Informr-_'t on technologies and innovations up-
plicable smallerjurisdictions.
■ Opportunities to impact developments on applied
research that respond to priority needs in small
jurisdictions.
Purposes and Goals
CrIP works to identify common technical needs and to
generate solutions which can be applied in the
thousands of communities under 50,000 in population.
It does this by providing local officials with a meeting
ground where they can develop an agenda for research,
development and demonstration projects, and trans-
fer innovative practical technology. C IP develops and
utilizes technology and information in three principal
ways:
1 It develops an R & D agenda for the needs of
• smaller communities. CHP member jurisdictions
engage annually in an extensive process, synthe-
sizing a concise number of priority needs from a
comprehensive list of needs. This list of priority
problems serves as a work plan for the program
on which research, development, and demon-
stration projects will be based.
2It links the Federal Laboratories through the
. Federal Laboratory Consortium and other
contacts. A number of these labs and Federal
agencies are providing scientists and engineers
on Intergovernmental Personnel Act (IPA) assign-
ments to CrIP communities. These persons,
functioning as circuit -riding technology agents,
provide CTIP member jurisdictions with technical
assistance. The labs serve as backup technical
support to the agents.
3It strives to maximize institutional interactions
. and communications with existing local govern-
ment representative organizations such as slate
municipal leagues, the National League of Cities,
International City Management Association, the
national local government innovation network
sponsored by the National Science Foundation,
regional Rural Development Centers, and
industry. These interactions facilitate the pro-
gram's efforts to disseminate informa-
tion on technologies and innovations to a larger
audience of small local governments. Coupling
these endeavors with other local government
networks multiplies the resources available to
smaller jurisdictions for technical expertise
and information.
na^) on technologies and innovations ap-
la ... smaller jurisdictions.
1p-tuniti to impact developments on applied
rch that respond to priority needs in small
and Goals
rkstoidentifycommontechnical needs and to
solutions which can be applied in the
of communities under 50,000 in population.
is by providing local officials with a meeting
here they can develop an agenda for research,
ant and demonstration projects, and trans -
live practical technology. CTIP develops and
chnologv and information in three principal
evelops en R & D agenda for the needs of
¢Iter communities. CTIP member jurisdictions
age annually in an extensive process, synthe-
fng a concise number of priority needs from a
prehensive list of needs.'1'his list of priority
blems serves as a work plan for the program
which research, development, and demon-
ation projects will be based.
inks the Federal Laboratories through the
ink
Laboratory Consortium and other
ntacts. A number o[ those labs and Federal
uncles are providing scientists and engineers
Intergovernmental Personnel Act (IPA) assign-
nts to CI'IP communities. These persons,
ctionfng as circuit -riding technology agents,
vide CrIP member jurisdictions with technical
ialance. The labs serve as backup technical
pport to the agents.
Id
to maximize institutional interactions
d communications with existing local govern-
pnl representative organizations such as state
Unicipal leagues, the National League of Cities,
lernational City Management Association, the
tional local government innovation network
Ionsored by the National Science Foundation,
Igional Rural Development Centers, and
duslry. These interactions facilitate the pro-
•am's efforts to disseminate informa-
3n on technologies and innovations to o larger
sdience of small local governments. Coupling
ipso endeavors with other local government
atworks multiplies the resources available to
naller jurisdictions for technical expertise
id information.
CTIP Steering Committee A ibers
Lawrence Bashe, City Administrator. Plainfield.
New Jersey
Larry N. Blick, City Manager, Rockville, Maryland
Tony Byrne (Chairman), Mayor, Natchez, Mississippi
William H. Carslarphen. City Manager, Spartanburg.
South Carolina
A.J. Cooper, Jr., Mayor, Prichard. Alabama
Lee R. Evell. City Manager, Clayton. Missouri
Alan N. Harvey (Chairman -elect), City Manager,
Vancouver, Washington
Harold 1. Jacobsen, Mayor. Carson City, Nevada
Orrin P. Joel, Mayor, Brookings, South Dakota
Gordon H. Paquette. Mayor, Burlington. Vermont
Wayne D. Wedin. (Immediate Past Chairman), City
Manager, Brea, California
Circuit Map
CTIP `111F
jurisdictions
Circuit I
Bran, California
Cacho County. Utah
Carson City, Nevada
Santa Fa. Now Moxico
Circuit Il
Casper, Wyoming
College Grove, Oregon
Ilclana,Ftonlann
lawiston, Idaho
Vancouver, Washington
Circuit III
Bemidji. hfinnaso u
Brookings, South Dakota
Galesburg, Illinois
Grand Island. Nebraska
Iowa City, Iowa
arcull N
Bryan,Toxns
Clayton, Missouri
otlawn, Kansas
Stillwater, Oklahomr.
Circuit V
Ilempstond County, Arkansas
Natchm ABssissippl
Prichard, Alabama
Spartanburg, South Carolina
Circult VI
number. Wast Virginia
Isabelle County, Michigan
o'llara Township, Pennsylvanin
Rockville,Maryland
Samford, Delaware
Circuit VII
Burlington, Vermont
East Providence, Rhudu Island
Nowburyporl, Mnssechusalts
Plainfield, Now Jersey
Saulh Portland, Maine
Public Technoingy. Inc. (Fn) be nomprofll public. Interest arganimtion
dedicated In facilitating Ilse application of available and amnrging
technology to slate and local government..
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES
Response Card
Further information about the Community Technology
Initiatives Program may be obtained from:
Public Technology, Inc.
Director, CLIP
1140 Connecticut Avenue, NW
Washington, D.C. 20036
Name
Title
Phone
Organization
Address —
Cily
State —
Tell me more about CM publications related to:
❑Community and
Economic Development
❑Criminal Justice
❑Energy
❑Environmental Services
E] Fire Safely and
Disaster Preparedness
❑ Health
❑Human Resources
❑Management, Finance,
and Personnel
❑Public Works andlltiRUes
❑Transportation
Tell me more about Public Technology's programs and
services:
❑ FTI Subscriber Services
❑ PTI Publications
❑ Public Technology News
❑ Please send me an additional copy of this brochure.
. t.
4
U O o7$
E c3, a
°
rR,p d 4
0.E
p
O
'ULA
R O O
O D >
m E v°
a N
V y7Q a O
� N o c
•C a m v
o EEE
°'N U O
E'
0 er
a�
0o mENa
5 og
DO
N d W
�ay? a
C
0
NNi
CO
L •T
v; o
O
p «
O
m U [ p
°
a >
p w p O 'Gf >
T p " •p O GD'OU G �' a O
c o 0a o -F °`.>i.— `p°CJ
w E o•N E ° oR o> m Ro L m
>,?�c. mRr a°ii-R.a E m m=` t3
0a�x°33an
E
°Qa:: aRyci
O z' a 0 m O O O G O O n R
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
N
a T
L
n E q
o
o
p
N L O
N
O
m
3
4
U O o7$
E c3, a
°
rR,p d 4
0.E
p
O
'ULA
R O O
O D >
m E v°
a N
V y7Q a O
� N o c
•C a m v
o EEE
°'N U O
E'
0 er
a�
0o mENa
5 og
DO
N d W
�ay? a
C
0
NNi
CO
L •T
v; o
O
p «
O
m U [ p
°
a >
p w p O 'Gf >
T p " •p O GD'OU G �' a O
c o 0a o -F °`.>i.— `p°CJ
w E o•N E ° oR o> m Ro L m
>,?�c. mRr a°ii-R.a E m m=` t3
0a�x°33an
E
°Qa:: aRyci
O z' a 0 m O O O G O O n R
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
--------------------------------------------
111111 Necessary
BUSINESS REPLY MAIL
FIRST CLASS PERMIT NO. 73422 WASHINGTON, D.C.
POSTAGE VALL BE PAID BY ADDRESSEE
Public Technology, Inc.
Director, CTIP
1140 Connecticut Avenue, NW
Washington, D.C. 20036
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES FIORIES
L
Miledin theled States
N
a T
L
O
m
3
r .-7
U
E: 9
rj
0 o
v y
O
y5 vY
p `o E '3 Q
y
z
0 0U
s U N Q
dS
R N20
01
Cd 0
-83r
« O U�:
L
J- a
3 S E
p
m Ij O
ao� o �V)
avi
c°.°
,"-a
°
�maa>�Yo
d
m w Do
zzzzzawa:j
U
°O o •
• • • • • • • •
--------------------------------------------
111111 Necessary
BUSINESS REPLY MAIL
FIRST CLASS PERMIT NO. 73422 WASHINGTON, D.C.
POSTAGE VALL BE PAID BY ADDRESSEE
Public Technology, Inc.
Director, CTIP
1140 Connecticut Avenue, NW
Washington, D.C. 20036
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES FIORIES
L
Miledin theled States
. t.
Let's Get Rid OF
"The Girl"
Wouldn't 1979 be
a great year
to take one giant
step forward
for womankind
and get rid of
"the girl"?
Your attorney says,
"If I'm not here
just leave it with
the girl."
The purchasing agent
says, "Drop off your
bid with the girl."
A manager says,
"My girl will get
back to your girl."
What girl?
Do they mean
Miss Rose?
Do they mean
Ms. Torres?
Do they mean
Mrs. McCullough?
Do they mean
Joy Jackson?
"The girl"
is certainly
a woman when she's
out of her teens.
Like you,
she has a name.
Use it.
A United Technologies reprint from The Wall Street lournal /O?�
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOVIES
Y•'V'
1
Y
� vol. z
No.8
�• Seplember 1979
The Ha wkeye pride
Iowa City Transit System
Iowa City Transit System is one of 17 large antl small urban systems within the slate of Iowa. It is
a fixed -route opthrough eration serving seven routes with 16 buses during oll•peak hours, providing
rom
except senior citizens who cane eft free durng he Off •peak Periods. heThe
is 25 cents for everybody,
The latest route revisions of the transit system, which Included alignments, extensions and
other them tes.Thations wereivedso sotedme
Aug.27,1978, to share and spread out the ridership evenly
on all the routes. This relieved some of the.
he old heavily -burdened routes. The timing of the route
changes was synchronized with the opening of the Universityof Iowa after summer vacations
client of
system.
st
he
inadequacies experienced by 1 ee Iowa City fT Transit Systehmsdurinp last yeaYIIOM rs Tstem from herefore, tan
additional route was added, the routes were from six to seven, and two new buses were put into
service during the oil -peak period.
The downtown of Iowa City (Clinton and Washington Streets) Is the hub of transportation
ecfivlly as three transit systems converge there to make free and easy transfers from one system to
the other. The two transit systems besides Iowa City ere Cambus and Corslville Transit System.
Cambus is a univeraify-owned and operated system, serving only the campus area without
charging any fares. Corslville Transit serves the university and downtown Iowa City. The most
commendable and noteworthy feature Is that the combined ridership of these three systems
exceeds that of any other city In the entire State of Iowa, though only serving a metropolitan
Population of about 50,000.
Iowa City Transit System has been experiencing a steady Increase in ridership ever since Its
inception during 1871. As each year passes the patronage of transit has been Increasing
overwhelmingly which could be attributed to the following factors;
restricted parking and shortage of parking space downtown.
effective route and schedule design to meet the existing demand In ridership.
Overwhelming support of the state employee support program. Approximately hall of the
subscribers to the program statewide use the Iowa City Transit System.
The most critical lest the transit system had to undego was during the severe 1878 winter
season. Inclement weather conditions, subzero temperatures and highly
demand caused a severe strain on the System during December through March• and a collapse
was Imminent. It was Overfed only through timely and ehandling the sita
d ridership
Two used buses were purchased with 100 percent city financing to bolster thebus fleet
requirements, which was having extensive breakdowns. The transit system routes were given
priority for snow remove I' With all the efforts made by the management to Cope with the high
ridership demand there were times when passenger. were left at the curb because Iowa City
Transit buses, were packed with riders and had to pass them by. Iowa City has submitted a capital
grant application for UMTA/FHWA funding approval lorprocurement of three buses.
accIowa City Transit System has been one of the most progressive systems in the slate, with the
d Percaplia rate.
omplishment he trra silmanageroflo aCty,iHugih Mose• wasawardedtheTrans0causlM niagthis
er
of the Year Award for 1878 by the Iowa Department of Transportation,
GREAT GOING HAWKEYE TRANSIT- KEEP IT UPIDIIIII
flICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 11011JES
HID
THE WAL TREET JOURNAL Tuesday, Oct. 9, .
Vying for Vwwers i
As Jousting for Cable -TV Franchises Gets
Cutthroat, Tactics Upset Some Officials
BY STAN CROCK
$tallaeportrr 0/710[0 wALLSTaaaTJOnFAL
Wt year, Wichita Falls, Texas, had ons
of Its most hotly contested voter referee-
dums ever. The Issue: whether the city
should openAts doors to cable television.
Opponents of cable TV ran a newspaper
advertisement picturing a cable, culled like
an evil snake, strangling a TV set. At two
local theaters they showed bootlegged films
of adult programs carried on another cable -
TV system, Including comedian Redd Pass's
sometimes -raunchy nightclub act and the R.
rated movie "Taxi Driver." Another ad
raised the specter of cable TV tuming the
city into a Sodom or Gomorrah: "World
communism takeover Is a real threat, but
It's mild compared to neral decay that
threatens to destroy us U we don't act nor."
Supporters promoted cable TV as a veld-
. cle for religion and children's programa
and birname entertainment. They rented a
theater next to the two used by opponents
and showed excerpts from such cable -TV
productions as a Dirk Cavett magic show
and Raquel Welch's nightclub act. And they
drummed up community backing through
talks to the ¢Iwanis Club and other local
organizations.
Wichita Falls voters tamed out W record
numbers. Cable TV won by a two -to -one m.
tio.
Similar battles between cable -TV sup-
porters and their opponents are being ward
In other communities. But the most bitter
fights often Involve companies vying for lu-
crative cable -TV franchLses that are up for
bid In a growing number of clues. The
competition Is cutthroat, noholda-barred,"
says Harold Horn, executive director of the
Cable Television Information Center, a sat.
profit group that has consu ted with 1,700
cities on cable -TV matters.
MlBlofia at state .
At stake in scores of cities from gopme
to Seattle are cable -TV franchises worth
minions of dollars a year. "There's hardly a
major city that Isn't In the midst of this,"
Mr. Horn says.
The franchise lights, however. are
spawning Practices that worry some Indus.
try officials. Robert Schmidt, former presi-
dent of the National Cable Television Asso-
clation, an Industry trade group, says he Is
concerned that cable -Tv companies may
Promise services that can't be provided eco-
nomically, He also is apprehensive that
"Companies, In the heat of competition,
could resort to some U the tactics of the
IM." Back then, at least one cable -TV ex-
ecutive larded In jail for bribing city am.
cials to obtain a franchise.
Until recently, the cable -TV Industry has
been hanrtrung N what kind of program.
ming It could offer by severe restrictions the
Federal Communications Commission lea.
posed In 1872 to curb abuses and to protect
local broadcasters. But the commission is
liftif many of those riles, allowing compa-
nies to offer a wider variety of prograos
that Is making cable TV attractive to cur
tomers In urban areas, even though they al.
ready may receive a large number of regu-
lar TV channels.
The basic cable -TV service provides Im-
proved reception from local stations and dB'
nats from stations in distant cities that can't
be received through the air. For a moolkly
fee, homes are United to a cable that brlep
In the TV signal. For an additions) in,
vlesrere can receive pay-cable TV. which of-
ten cor nMW-het movkv, Sports and
other programa
woft the Loeala
Fust, however, the cable -TV companies;
often must overcome opposition from com-
mercW TV broadcasters and movie-tbeater
maers to persuade Weal governments to al-
low cable operations. Indeed, the battle In
Wichita Falls occurred atter the city esund
had already awarded a franchise to a unit of
Time Inc.'s American Television k Commlu-
nicailm Inc. Local broadcasters led the op-
position, demanding and getting a referent.
dant on the decision.
When a city decide$ to award a cable -TV
hatoise, companies compete with various
strategies. In Springfield, Mo., for example,
cable competitors arranged for he trips by
cltycmmcB members to Inspect cable -TV
systems W such places as San Francisco,
Sul Diego, New Orleans, Denver and Or.
]socio, FIL, according to veronica Ffkdlas,
a Springfield resident who kept tabs on the
city's franchise process.
Perhaps the most widespread tactic is
vital is known In the Industry as the "rat-a-
cttizen" ploy, In which applicants for fras-
chim remdt kcal buten who we wslt-
known a who have political , ... _.
Occasionally, the local people bwA a a"
Interest W the company, an Inmsat dot
can become a bonanza If the compney whe
the franchise.
Sometimes the notables "are jad along
for window dressing," says Painsls Miller,
vice president of a company affiliated with
Storer Broadcasting Co. that Is vybsg for the
cable -TV franchise In basketballvM Ler
Ington, Ky. One of her mmpsays.comped-
fors enlisted University of Kentucky basket -
bell coach Joe B. Hall and one of the sten
of his 1978 national ciamplenWp team,
Jack Givens. To show off Its portable cam-
eras, motile studio vans and satellite pro-
gramming, Mrs. Miller's company rented
tI1CROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
EEOAR RAPIDS -DES 1101nFs
the [Lapp Arrow, the basketball team's n,-
ooPseat home named after Adolph Rupp, the
revered turner coach.
Raab In the Region
IM1dmtl
11 companies stress their local ere.
Alexandria, VL, near washing -
W94 An official of cos local cable -TV W.
cant said he altaady'bW bought bla YrW
Plot In town. An officer of another company,
former FCC Chairman Frederick Ford,
bolded of bus Me as Mortimer In a local
pm&ftm of "Aramis and Old lace."
The city couch recently awarded the
franchise to Alexandria Cablevlslon Co.,
which the city's technical consultant had
rated as the beat applicant The company's
.mmfl member.
sad Its
President
Includesa former majority
leader Of the MM here of deleptaa Otk.
em affiliated with the company Include for.
mer Attorney General Richard IGelodelnst
and
ee
Flemming,
a on hint Ude to
dn
The outcome of the fraerkUe fight rayed
a few eyebrows because the winner t
the company that the city's financial comi-
tant and cable -TV administrator had recon-
mended. Ice Bertrnen, the consultant W
ileves that "Political considerations played a
role" In the selection. But cable -TV Fran.
chLsing "Ls a political process." he says.
"That's Just the way It Is in every city."
So far, there doesn't seem to be any hard
evidence that bribery hes returned as a tac-
tic to obtain franchises. But the hot demand
for cable TV has attracted some fast -buck
artists.
Fwmatme hitch
Several months ago, for example, Tele -
View Productions distributed leaflets In
Philadelphia neighborMods promising toeut
70% off the cat of Installing cable TV for
those who signed up for the service quickly.
Within three days, about 1,000 cable-hugry
people gave tlnusentis of dollars to Tele,
View.
They had Just one problem. Nobody had
been given a franchise to set up a cable -TV
system In those parts of town. William
Clancy of Newfoundland, Pa., had an even
bigger problem City officials say he Is the
man behind the leaflets, and they accuse
him of attempting "a major shakedown U
Phlladelphla residents," Mr. Clancy pleaded
guilty to fraud charges.
Among legitimate cable -TV companies,
the overpromising of facilities that some ob.
servers fear Is rampant, Industry officials
say. The extravagant promises may include
agreements to provide extensive local faclll.
ties, a large number of channels and two.
19f/
way systems that permit viewer participa-
tion.
There Is a feeling in the industry that
companies will "do and say and promise
anything to get the franchise," says Jobe
Evans, vice president of Arlington Telecom-
munications; Corp., which operates a able -
TV system In Arlington, Va. "Once a hatl-
chise is awarded, there's little a city can
do.'
As In Wichita Falls, though, the battle
over cable -TV franchises and services can
continue even after a franchise has been
granted. In Monroeville. Pa., two residents
whose lawyer had a financial stake In an on -
successful franchise applicant sued the win-
ner, an affiliate of Time's American Televi-
sion t Communications, or ATC, charging
that It had committed perjury In Ifs applica-
tions. According to the lawsuit, ATC sale it
had a color studio in Lynchburg, Va., when
a studio hadn't yet been built.
C. Reggie Whitley, a Lynchburg city oln-
cial, confirm that Is February, when ATCs
application was submitted, the company
hadn't built a studio. Construction began
later only after numerous meeting between
the company asci city omelets, he nays. at-
y<ouneil members had "considerable con -
em," Mr. Whitley uys, that "the services
oritMvty Promised (in 1sT!) weren't being
delivered."
ATC officials blame the construction de-
lay on the FCC and the city council. "There
was absolutely no problern with our filing In
Monroeville," says Joseph CoWns, ATC vice
president for Bohm operations. June
Travb, vice president for administration,
adds, "We fed we're In compliance (with
the Lynchburg franchise ordinance). We're
had our equipment there."
One reason for such confusion Is that lo-
cal goverment officials rain aren't famD-
lar with the new and frequently complex is-
sues related to able -TV operations.
In Pittsburgh, city offlcWs ran Into prob-
lems even before the city decided to start
the franchise process. Jamea VAlilams., u
electrician, Ned an application for u else.
trical permit while the city was pondering
What 10 do about cable TV. The city permit
department, Oinking Mr. Williams wu
making a regular some
roc tW wort, Issued tl
the permiplication to t. a
While, city authorities realized that Mr. MI.
Hams had applied to set up a able -TV sys-
tem, Andthey revoked the permit. "We
were In the huddle," a city official uya,
"ate 02 guy picked up the ball and ran for
It tounhdowT."
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 110INES
d
The
Building Line
Volume 25
IM,
MICROEILMEB By
JORM MICROLAB
1nA;: uAPIfiS•al "Uiljf11
October 1979
X MARKS THE SPOT
ATTENTION;
During mid-September you may have
noticed some sidewalks marked with a small
flourescont orange,X
BUILDERS AND DESIGNERS
approximately 211 by
12" in size. This was done to accommodate
a:'sidewalk repair program in
1979 UNIFORM CODES COMING IN SPRING
the south
central,part.of Iowa City with some federal
money. The major area of inspection was
The 1979 Uniform Codes including
the Building Code,
south, of Burlington Street to the rail-
Plumbing Code,
Mechanical Code and Fire Code
road tracks and east:of Gilbert Street to
First Avenue, The
are
presently under review by the City
Community Development
Block Grant Program allocated $84,500 to
staff and various advisory boards
have, 2000 squares of sidewalk replaced.
prior to submission to the City
Council for adoption late in
In`developing'this
program the Division
Spring of 1980.
of Building designed some standards for
sidewalk, replacement.These standards
There are several major changes in
the
will; soon be submitted to Council for
new Building Code, the most
significant of which is the elim-
their approval and will be enforced city-
wide not only for the CDBG program but :
ination of construction require -
for any sidewalk that we feel needs to be
replaced.
ments by fire zone. The 1979 Code
now regulates' the design of build -
The ,standards- that were used -
for this
- ings on their intended use and con -
program are as follows:
struction•types. Uniform codes are
1 Whenever there.is an elevation differ -
developed by' the International
Conference of.'Building"Officials
once greater than.3/4" between, one
piece of concrete and
and because they affect the ma' r -
o,
another.
ity of :the:cities:'west of the.a"
Whenever aof sidewalk is
Mississippi River, local reviewissquare
essentialpriorto'adoption -so that
greater than 50% spalded or has a
local amendments.canbe..made;to, the
spald or, chip; greater than 1/210 in
depth and 5" in length.
Code to allow for construction
practices and environmental:con-
3 Whenever a control joint has a crack
ditions that are unique not only to
the midwest but to Iowa and specifiw
larger than'l" or there is a crack
cally,Iowa City.
larger than 1/411.in.a square or
whenever a'square is -.cracked into 4
With the high volume of non- re.si-
or more pieces.
dential work currently being planned
4. Whenever there is a piece of side-
essential to provide about>in Iowa City, we thought.it six
walk missing greater than :4" in any
months notice to builders and archi-
two directions.
tects so that construction_ projects'
1. S. Whenever one or more squares has a
scheduled for building permit
review after June 1, will be
sl
slope greater than 3" in four feet,
.1980
designed to be in conformance with
6, Whenever repairs are possible they
the 1979 Code.
must be made with an approved latex
- bonding,
Any person or organization having
suggestions regarding Code changes
Currently Iowa City has an ordinance for
they would like to have the Board
of Appeals and the City Council
sidewalk replacement, however, the ordin-
consider may refer their written
ance does not address any design criteria
recommendations to the Building
for that replacement. These standards
'developed
Official for forwarding to the
were to provide that criteria
Building Board of Appeals.
And, In the near future, will be utilized
throughout the City. If you should have
The City has placed copies of the
any question concerning the criteria
1979 codes for citizen review at
used for the sidewalk repair program,
the Iowa City building permit
please contact Jerry Denison at the
counter, the City Clerk's office
Division of Building.
and the Iowa City Public Library.
IM,
MICROEILMEB By
JORM MICROLAB
1nA;: uAPIfiS•al "Uiljf11
STATISTICS
MINIMUM HOUSING
BUILDING INSPECTION
During August, 1979, 92 structures were
During the month -of -August, 1979, 70 Build -
inspected containing 513 dwelling units
ing Permits, 21 Mechanical Permits, 20 '
and 98 rooming.units.._In addition, 138
Plumbing Permits, and 46 Electrical Permits
reinspections were conducted. 248 dwell-
have been issued by the City. The total
ing units and 132 rooming units were
value of all August construction in Iowa`
found to be in compliance with the Mini-
City is $5,266,830. There were 3 demo-
mum Housing Code of Iowa City.
lition permits issued.
HOUSING ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
*
*r
Plumbing tests will.be"given at '7:00 p;M.
* ,
During August, 1979, 6 units were brought
*, on October 17, 1979: at the ,Civic Center.
.*t
into the Section; 8, Program.
*Practical tests for successful journeymen
,*
* will :be'given at'7:00 P:M: on`October 24`
Total units;'Section 8 = 338.
�* at R. M. Boggs shop at 2804 Industrial
-
* Park Road:'. Applications must be`in,by
* October 15.
L:
1
a
( 1
i
Y 1 � i / + -
•I
1 1
rV
f
^
f 1 1
i
1
1
SSI aNllw,ad
_- ObZ s emol•45eNm e01b
YMOI AIIA VM01MoJ
QIVd
,�a;uag oiAlO
saoiAJaS uo[4oadsul pue
39111SOd'S'0
6%snoH jo 4uaw;.aeda0
fit3lltlH
Sm emol';o An
MICROFILMED By
JORM MICROLAB
CEf7AP RAPI')S.DF "O:IIES
City of Iowa City
Department of Housing
JIM >ull
and Inspection Services
U. g POSTAGE
Civic Center
PAID
410 E. Washington
Iowa City, Iowa 52240
IOWA CI TYTY, , IOWA
A
Permit 155
i
i
i
i
{
C it
1
I '
I (I
f
.'� •`.6q'MI.,aq 4snw suot;eotLddV 5peoag3Jed""
* tetj snPuI b08Z,,Ie dogs..s66og •W •a 4e ,,
'U 0'W'd 00:L.3e,.uant6'a9
'BEE 8 uotl3aS.fs3tun Le;ol -
LLLM ."
.*!UB aW 0 i; Ln;ssaaons. ao�. s�sa; Le5t3oeld *
+,
--•we,a6o.ad`8 uo13gag a41: o;ui '
to;ua0 otn}0 a4;•,4e 6L61 ;.'LL Aagoioo-uo ;
*
346no.aq aaaM s;tun 9 `6L6L 41sn6ny 6utjri0
+W d,00,1 3e uant6 q ,tttM s4sa4,6utgwntd ;
**��*" ***+++►*•+w*Iry*�*+rrx**r+��r*�***+�s+cxx*i
:
WV8908d 30NVISISSV 9NIS110H
pansst sltutaad uotltL
-owap g ataM aaa41 :•0E8'9gzlSs st A';tO
o 6u sno wow
'4310 eMo P 0 t H.
uL ,a 1.
eMot ut uOt4:)na suoa sn6n
= V:Lte anten
- dw o
L W 43 g3un aouettdwoa ut.aq o4 puno3
, as
" "Le3o3.a41 'aO
Aq Pansst uOut anid
ataM s3 tun 6utwoOJ Ut Pue s3tun';6ut
-LIaMP M 'Pa4onpuoo
0 P
s31w.aad leata;oaL3"96 Pue;`slLwlad.6utgwnLd
a.laM suot3aadsutaa
8ET`'uollIppe ul
-PL MflZOL5�6W ad [sn6neyoaW 13 `s3twd6d 6ut
y
..S4�un 6utwooi 86 PUP
s3tun.6uttLaMP Elg 6utute3uo� pa3Dadsut
;o, 43uow a44.6utin0
a.aaM sain3an.a3s U ' 6L6i-13sn6ny 6utin'
N0I103dSNI Milling
9NIS00' N— W—(IWjNIW
-" S�I1S11111S
J
MICROFILMED
BY
JORM
MICROLAB
cEnne
. 4)II+Is
W
i
parks & recreation MEMO
department
to: Neal Berlin and City Council from
• Dennis Showalter
re. Cemetery Wall date
.October 10, 1979
As you may know, we have fixed the worst section of the Oakland Cemetery wall,
the.E-W walls along the old driveway, that were leaning and in danger of collapsing.
We wish now to start work on the worst section of the N -S wall along Governor
Street. We wish to follow the plan shown on Exhibit I, which will cover the sidewalk.
We propose to build a new sidewalk across the street, from Ronalds to Brown, to re2lace
the existing sidewalk on the East side.
1 I have met with Hugh Mose regarding bus loading and unloading, he doesn't feel
f that it will cause him any problems. I have talked personally with the 2 adacent
property owners and they have no objection. j
The cost of the sidewalk is estimated to be $896.00 for materials (Exhibit 2),
t with Park crews doing the work. If we were to build a new cemetery wall on the East
side the estimated cost would be $175 to $200 per foot.
Th
the operating budget. The cost of the wall project (FigureaI)896.00 will beial come from
$5 per foot, as we have the fill material on hand, and will do the work withxParkely
crews.
If You have no objections, we will proceed with this project this fall.
I
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES NOIRES
1483
0
I
CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOINES
11
POWER POLE
f
PROPOSED FILL
1,5
�c`Qy
?
STONE
WALL
3.5
GOVEROR ST.
SIDEWALK
(TO BE REMOVED)
5
TYPICAL SECTION
CEMETERY
WALL REPAIR
SCALE I = 4
CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOINES
--)City of Iowa Cites
MEMORANDUM
Date: September 21, 1979
To: Dennis Showalter, Director of Parks & Recreation
From: Frank Farmer, Civil Engineer
Re: Sidewalk on Governor Street - Westside - Ronalds to Brown
Attached please find a copy of estimated cost for the sidewalk on Governor
Street. The lower estimate is for the park crews doing the work and is for
material only. The higher cost is as if the work would be contracted out
to a private contractor. If you have any questions, please call.
bj5/7
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOINES
X2.1/ �!
CITY OF IOWA CITY, IOWA �
ESTIMATE OF COST
Date Sco�. Zo /979
Project 87, .6w4 k
cation'_ a V- Et. — Well
.S' t%
i
i
I
Qaanti ty
unit
Item
-Unit
Price
Cost
LZ 0
S, w.lk
D
690.00
3
ESL
CW r b D1-. s
o 00
20. 00
wr k
6
P k
17
Cu. Jr.
PC. Cep c + k C- 3 ri
38.00
or „ a .n e r S,. kes
Cr
, ,r;,
/ Oo
/ CO . OD
Total:
de by
iecked by
Approved by�5�LL//�l�v�G
Titlecl.zy, L77 1 171 CA -t- Date 9-20-99
MICROFILMED BY
g JORM MICROLAB
i CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 140114ES
AGENDA OF PROPERTIES
CITY COUNCIL TOUR
OCTOBER 15, 1979
1:30 p.m. - 624 N. Linn - Iva Helleman, Manager
Application for a housing permit was made by Mrs. Iva Hellman on
August 8, 1979. This property was inspected by Inspector Brian
Kuebler on August 21 and Mrs. Helleman received a Notice of Violation
i on August 24. One of the violations cited on that notice was lack of
required ceiling height in dining room, bedroom, and kitchen of Apt.
2. This violation has been appealed by Mrs. Helleman who states that
an improper interpretation of Chapter 17-6(d) of the Housing Code has
been made.
2:00 p.m. - 915 E. Washington - Willie Wulf, Manager - Rosalie Campbell,
Owner
This property was inspected by Inspector Kuebler on June 21, 1979 and
subsequent to that inspection, he issued a Notice of Violation on
July 6 to Ms. Rosalie Campbell; owner, in care of Mr. Willie Wulf.
Again, he cited lack of required ceiling height in the third floor
dwelling unit. This case was appealed by Mr. Wulf and Ms. Campbell
and heard by the Housing Appeals Board on September 27, 1979. The
decision of that hearing was that a violation did, in fact, exist and
the Appeals Board upheld the Notice of Violation as written.
2:30 p.m. - 331 S. Johnson - Robert Bender, Owner
Mr. Robert Bender made application for a housing permit on July 10,
1979. An inspection was conducted by Inspector Kuebler on July 18,
1979. On July 27, Mr. Bender received this Notice of Violation.
Among the violations cited was Chapter 17-4(a)(2)(c) Improper
Handrails. Chapter 9.30.N.2.(d) Lack of Required Guardrails was
also cited as a violation. Both the handrails and guardrails are
located in the foyer area of this building and after an
administrative review, the violation regarding the handrails was
dismissed. The violation of lack of required guardrails remains, in
that, the guardrails on the interior stairway are approximately six
inches too low.
2:50 p.m. - 320-322 S. Johnson - Donald Griffin, Owner
This property was inspected on August 17, 1979 by Housing Inspector
David Malone and Senior Housing Inspector Terry Steinbach due to
several neighborhood complaints. A Notice of Intent to Placard was
issued and hand -delivered to Mr. Griffin on August 23. Mr. Griffin
requested a hearing before the Housing Appeals Board and his case was
heard on October 11, 1979. The Housing Appeals Board upheld the
Notice of Intent to Placard as written.
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 110HIES
110
W
3:00 p.m. - 3 E. Harrison - Ron Johnson, Owner
This property was inspected on July 19, 1978 by Inspector Pamela
Barnes. A Notice of Violation was issued to Mr. Johnson and received
by him on July 31, 1978. Of the violations cited, those which remain
as of Inspector Kuebler's last reinspection on August 30 are; lack of
fire extinguishers, lack of second means of egress, and steps not
maintained in a good state of repair. This property and the
occupants have been made eligible and have been certified for rent
escrow.
bdw/sp
FIICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOINES
■*
ORDER TO CORRECT COKDITION OF PREMISES
CITY OF IOWA CITY
CIVIC CENTER 410 E. WASHINGTON ST. IOWA CITY IOWA 52240 (319) 354.18030
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND INSPECTION SERVICES
August 23, 1373
!;CTICE OF VICILATIU_t
Iva 'I. l;i ll�rian
rentals by Ivatte 5 -55
Sox 576
Io+a City, Joua 52240 -7
Re: 624 11. Linn, 7 Dtirallia; U, -its
Dear rs. Piilej,an:
The abova listed proparty was inspected on August 21, 1y79, by Lriar;
Wabler, housins Inspector, Lepartrrnt of )'.ousing and Ins,:cctioM Services
The folioring it. --ms aro. violations of Chapter 17 of the !,unicipal Codc
of Ioua City and are hereby Droug:a to your attention fur correction:
1. Chapttr g.3G.11.i:. Lack of valid itulti,le rjaullinc Fcm.it.
a. Lac): of valid pcmit.
2. Chapt.2r 9.30.G.2.(L,) Lada of required handrails.
a. Front iurch steps lack second handrail.
b. front ste?s to sidewalr, lack second handrail.
c. Lack of safety teninals on ;:andrail in a,artrent 2.
u. Lack of safety tanainals cn handrail bet�xcn first and second
floors.
3. Ch_pter 17-10(n) Laci, of ap roved fire extinguisher.
E. No fire extinguish^_r in Z,,SrtL;9nt :li,•
C;iapt=r17-5(g)(i) Lack of Sic:; ate verailation.
a. EXhanSt fan in apt, lA is not }•arLing.
Chapter17-7(h)(1) Inadequate design of PiuP+bing.
a. Faucet in apt. 3 bath tub projects below ria of tui;.
6. Chapter 17-7(a) Coiling not caintained in a t U state of re air.
a. Paint is p__elinq off ceiling in batiroor.. of apt. 4.
��XJW- NT
AY'mLB1r,
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOIRES
i
I
i
i
I
i
j
i
j
I
j
i
ORDER TO CORRECT COKDITION OF PREMISES
CITY OF IOWA CITY
CIVIC CENTER 410 E. WASHINGTON ST. IOWA CITY IOWA 52240 (319) 354.18030
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND INSPECTION SERVICES
August 23, 1373
!;CTICE OF VICILATIU_t
Iva 'I. l;i ll�rian
rentals by Ivatte 5 -55
Sox 576
Io+a City, Joua 52240 -7
Re: 624 11. Linn, 7 Dtirallia; U, -its
Dear rs. Piilej,an:
The abova listed proparty was inspected on August 21, 1y79, by Lriar;
Wabler, housins Inspector, Lepartrrnt of )'.ousing and Ins,:cctioM Services
The folioring it. --ms aro. violations of Chapter 17 of the !,unicipal Codc
of Ioua City and are hereby Droug:a to your attention fur correction:
1. Chapttr g.3G.11.i:. Lack of valid itulti,le rjaullinc Fcm.it.
a. Lac): of valid pcmit.
2. Chapt.2r 9.30.G.2.(L,) Lada of required handrails.
a. Front iurch steps lack second handrail.
b. front ste?s to sidewalr, lack second handrail.
c. Lack of safety teninals on ;:andrail in a,artrent 2.
u. Lack of safety tanainals cn handrail bet�xcn first and second
floors.
3. Ch_pter 17-10(n) Laci, of ap roved fire extinguisher.
E. No fire extinguish^_r in Z,,SrtL;9nt :li,•
C;iapt=r17-5(g)(i) Lack of Sic:; ate verailation.
a. EXhanSt fan in apt, lA is not }•arLing.
Chapter17-7(h)(1) Inadequate design of PiuP+bing.
a. Faucet in apt. 3 bath tub projects below ria of tui;.
6. Chapter 17-7(a) Coiling not caintained in a t U state of re air.
a. Paint is p__elinq off ceiling in batiroor.. of apt. 4.
��XJW- NT
AY'mLB1r,
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOIRES
fi
1
�
i
i
i
1
)
I
I
I
i
E
1
r
I
i
I
i
(
i
i
i
I
I
Iva ;;. Iiitte•:a^. ,-,
Linn
2
7. CL•arter 17-b(d) LCL of required ceiling heicht.
a. Ceiling in dining ruo:, bedroow and kitchen of apt. 2 is I:, -ll
under Vie required hcigtlt.
You Will hove ninety (90) days after receipt of this notice to correct
these deficiencies. At that ticw: a rciuspection %rill be carried out to
ilisure aeae eo;-,;;iiancet
Shol;ld YOU Trish to contest any of these orders, your txittt:n petitica
reglr_stin-c; a Nearing Lefure Vle housing Apy=als Loard Frust be received
in the Of rice of tile City Clerk 4rit.;in ten (10) days of service of t;lis
notice. Your petition for a i;earing r.Rrst briefly state the grounds for
yolr appeal. If you have, any questions, please feel free to call }busing
Inspection at 3354-1;w, extension 314 or 34;.
Sincerely,
Lrlau Kuebler
Housing Inspector
bice/1-2
BE, Sell
DCCUMBNT
O SENDER: Complete lmms 1,-'. and J.
Add Your address in the "RETURN TO" spice on
19
3 rtrer:
1. TheJolIn%ing service is requested (check one).
>L7 Show to whom and date delivered.....'..
fJ Show to whom, dam, and addrms of del iver•.. y a e
RESTRICTED DF.LIVERl'
Show to u.hum and dale delivered.........
M RESTRICTED DELIVERY.
Show to u.hom, date, and address of delivery. $__
(CONSULT POSTMASTER FOR FEES)
T. ARTICLE ADDRESSED TO:
++t I1TarCL,
3 ARTICLE DESCRIVTION:
REGISTERED N0. ,L/IEI
CERTED NO INSURED NO.
i — 17GI�;
i I (Alwap onbin tianature os Wdrtua of •Anel
! 1 have received the article described above.
SIGNATURE AUdr we ❑ Authorized apeni
e c� ITY _
DATE or DELIVERY 0 K
l-
5. AD KESS ICampbteantTd tqui led
Ngo
6. UNABLE TO DELIVER BECAUSE- A �S
IAL[.
kq A�\J
FIiCROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 140111ES
�� ^ }arae u+• assn
1� a
a c
)RQER TO CORRECT Cip DITION OF PREMISES
CITY OF IOWA CITY
CIVIC CENTER 410 E. WASHINGTON ST. IOWA CITY IOWA 52240 (319) 354.180D
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND INSPECTION SERVICES
.hely 6, 1979
JX;i I(T C?:' '7ItiLT:PI(:.: %, •�
'*salia axr,tx�li
c/o S"iIiv l%,If. /
7.35 I.p_%G-rto:1
Icl:a Cita
, la,a 522:0
I
915 T... s;11.>>irx tn,. R Z:
��li J.. 1:i.SyiTCltOR
Pa :^ 2
sr. mar%ter 17-90,1)tcY.uv7r.. ryat ra-intalrvA in c,p7 %joet2nj
W.-IlitiaH.
a. All unit ti
lae' f' roairg Es:ri:c dLtcotozc.
7. jae,.of r,.v2-rr-4 lo: i r.• :3rrice on 6xrs/cir.9ars.
r„ JLC: o-` wirr"o;1 iodal in varicrm daces on first floor.
ti•.;�
r/p. �wp;:rr 17-{(r) Jam: of rcguirc3 crilizg
,iz; Floor c•+cllin- unit lr?:s a»rcc:istcly 7' o` renrim'i
r_cilirc, hei?ht.
q, a-nrter 17-7(a) Halls mt raint;sne, in a ,x3 state of repair.
a. Fe^? ing r, int iz !>,llMsv L -rt ..k-^^ s c Y i ora thi-d floors.
10. Oia ter 9.30.7.F.1. J: c,: of m: *red electrical light c•.+itch.
n. ;Idn.i floor latdhoo - livi:x; roc-: lar_•:, 1 sato;.
}�. _hir 4 floor )x3rmy lies n s.:itch,
r.. fl—conA, floor slutwcst bxirasa lads l.s::it^h.
d. uccnl flair r;o t )3td» lads 1 witch.
e. 9.xro^3 Floor rnztucast living ra%.r lad:r 1 maitel.
f. Soot r' floor mrt}areat be �•c:ta la^_rs 1 switch.
11. om-_ter 17-7(1)7. L-tCi: of mfuim-i olec rival cutlet.
a. First lcr_r dinL-r. rccn l -:75:o ar- outl.-.t.
h. Seco:r.? flair Y.ithen lades o»A 011let.
yrrl will have nim-ty (90) dgy.r,, -Ft(--r rccnirt of thi.. notica to crcr-r t
At t.I it tine a rr_ ra ccUor. will 1x car (0 alt to
Lnsuze cor3c m-pl i'mc :.
Heol? =au Yr_�� rainrst asr� of txae U:CJZF,, }7i written ;vatic,
M-j1w?StL-rT a Heari]YI }XZUrc the }sCY.::1.Yf id.T,p xls oa a 1. 7t be rc-cpiw"l
in Uc Office o`- Lhc City Clog v:ie:ir, ten (10) dz!,rZ of s'n�ico o` Uus
.oticv. z&= rr-tition for a I;oaring -mt bric::ly stat(- t;e, q.r for
yo,x a^, If yo:r hs ^e •-?: err: ions, vlc, .•o f 3cl .^.rM. is Gll Fo;i i rl
In_=r_Uc. ,at 3:4-1Fn0, mtere;im 314 or 3441.
Si-r_ercly,
^rias Faiebler
1 ail/E-5
' BEST
DOCUM.ENT
A
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOIRES
t
j
I
l
i
j
i
h'
I
e
I.
i
i
t
I'
I
f
I
I
i
I
I
J
,R • aL\NhW Eun.pkto dons I.:. a�J?-��
Add your aJJrrw in Inc' kLI L % TO'lr.,, on
3 reren
7 1. The fWlnwin); sorter is myoesled (chmL one).
rhnw m whom and date dehsered..
El Show' to whom. dine, and address of deli,try .ted
RF.STRICTI:D DELIVERY
Show to whom and date delisered.........
RESTRICTED DELIVERY. c
Show to whom• dale, and address of del,,,ry S_
\i (CONSULT POSTMASTER FOR FEES)
t. ARTICLE ADORES To
Z 3. ARTICLE DESCRIPTI(�1!
x REGISTERED N0.
n CERTIFIED NO. I INSURED NO.
�P37a�C
m r (At"" nbraln eanaNre of addn. rirawntl
D I have received the article ei I rr/above.
SIGNATURE 0 Aldo, 1L,
y IJr AuI rigid agent
D
' N a.
DATE OF DELIVERYad
D P
i 5. ADDRESS (Complslr onl it rr
D r R,rerl.
m r'
y
r fl s 7
m 6. UNABLE TO DELIVER BECAUSE: Q� I LER LS
O
j
d
LCI- ,i:
G��+J.S�1V11Y��}BL'+a
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 140111ES
ORDER TO CORRECT COADITION OF PREMISES
CITY CSF IOW/\ CITY
CIVIC CENTER 410 E. WASHINGTON ST. IOWA CITY IOWA 52240 (319) 354.180D
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND INSPECTION SERVICES
July 24, 1979
2'1idCt; (!F' !TIOi.71^_'I4.•: %/f"
335 S. Cli±?.m
Icla City, 11µ.-a 527.40
331 s. JONI -1, 9 1^.uollir3 l nits
Ccar IL-. Inn er:
X13 ri12i1'.•� listr_�-TCr_.1CrCv 17r _^. {
P 111 actf�9 m rTul 11', 197n. '. ;� i'rim
2 1eSler, izrusin3 In :x to.^^, iY�3rtri.tt of '_c isilr.. ar:i In^,-rct4" Se^=c c.
T1e fello.imp it l are violatix2 of [;„mer 1 a e.�
7 c_ t.._ :1fa.`ticic,al. Co"R4
o` Ix;n City 43 arc c=u'r.• 11_•-rrht to .'o%r atrs-lticn; for o)rrcction:
1. Cr;n^tns 9.30.1LT.. :.aCi: of. rnli� !b�lti_Ac n;�llillg FM�1•rit
a. Iod. o v.Ilid p^_r at.
_. Cl;?tcr17 4(i)(2)c L -.-.-;r
ccx
!1ar'railc.
r.. Iztcrior stairs hanirnil lar;%; s 'cam: to ni'als.
3 t^s 9.30.'.:.2. (cl) La&X o_`t
rcla_n,�-i
a. C.1.zrentil cn intsrior stair e -Li t is:i µicy r_•r' la:.
4. c1 1*17-10(1)(2) 1'r -M„ mt t:;i�tei _.r. in �. i :talc oP rc^air.
a. 7,ccrss to `im exsx� x eget ire i hlovcc:. by rH�loc•c:?
_._-L".a dcmr.
5. Ovantcr 17-7(.) rMAccti•,e electric-
:Isp un.
a. •_11er.^_ is e\T,0±ce! wirLn1 hlorr, in nnjt-ri`a t 1YtuTY_`:1
of
[. Ch; tee.- 177 1' i7alls not ; iat:i;'3 i1 n c CS state; o° rc=ir.
F.. N'>t. is has PC-31i;r' ,lint In the ScUtJ'T7nr1t
7. CnsJtc 17 -?(i) Ivprq-,er 1r,: o` cxrxts.
a. f1^re it Mozart' wiri;): in livi17rG7. Or F7'.7t. 02.
BEST
DOCUMENT
AVAILABLE
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES
331 S. Joanv;,;n
ra-ic 2
You will lixre, nir..?ty (10) eayn aftsr receipt of Udc mice to corre.-t
Uses: d:.`icianciez;. ?.t 01-:11, tilxv a reir,.^rc:tion will ;on, carried. out to
ino^IL'e Code QJ:'i7Urbnce.
e" U'lld V(r: wish to contest any of t1e3e ort:c•rca, ya+s written petition
L3'.jU(!Y,ti.n3 a ^e.:Llhg Sr,:e%re the lield9il?] T;:KT_^e?1`3 n3 —d ,:west ho r'[:SiV•"S
in tie Lvffica of the City Clark lli&.in ten (10) clays o� r^?rl:io2 of t1daa
notice. your r)atitionn for a llezrsrirx; rust. briefly state the gmrr s for
ycri a,-:,x:al. If VCGr )lens m, ,la^_stions, clna:: feel free t,-) c, -:ll Fknzing
In!:F-ection at 354-1&CG, c:tc cion 314 or 34f.
Sivr_rcly,
T�rLan }:ucilcr -
nnkxiTT;a ingp&'-tor
irj r.110,11
q SENDER: Cumplele item{ I,=.and 3.
,I
1. The following service is rn(uestad (,hcek one). /
P*Shaw m whom and date delivered. ....... 't
r
P
Show to whom and date delivered.........._q
C] RESTRICTED DELIVERY.
Show to whom• date, and address of deliv Iry. S—
(CON5DLT POSTMASTER FOR FE S)
� �
6
�_ •�dz��.t o(�ir ,5'ZZ.yo�'zz.yo
3. ARTICLE DESCRIPTION:
REGISTERED fi0.CERTIEICD N0. INSURED NO.
�d 3�oaC�
, IAlwan obbin dpnavn o4ddresw onp,nil
I have rectivird-ithr article described above.
r
A
I
POSTN
7_ a%7
�tV IA
G
5. ADDRESS (Compote only if nau. t.d)
'
L
1
i
4
A
I
I
1
I'
I I
I
I
1
I
L'
q SENDER: Cumplele item{ I,=.and 3.
Add your add,m In the ••RFTURI: TO" {peer on
rtverr.
1. The following service is rn(uestad (,hcek one). /
P*Shaw m whom and date delivered. ....... 't
Show to whom, date, and address of delivery. ._e
E] RESTRICTED DELIVERY
Show to whom and date delivered.........._q
C] RESTRICTED DELIVERY.
Show to whom• date, and address of deliv Iry. S—
(CON5DLT POSTMASTER FOR FE S)
1. ARTICLE ADDRESSED TO:
�_ •�dz��.t o(�ir ,5'ZZ.yo�'zz.yo
3. ARTICLE DESCRIPTION:
REGISTERED fi0.CERTIEICD N0. INSURED NO.
�d 3�oaC�
, IAlwan obbin dpnavn o4ddresw onp,nil
I have rectivird-ithr article described above.
dressee 'dspent
SIGNAZX19��-
A
OATDELIVERY
POSTN
7_ a%7
�tV IA
G
5. ADDRESS (Compote only if nau. t.d)
'
`v`�
6, UNABLE TO DELIVER BECAUSE!LCRK'S�
i TIALS
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 1101flES
I I.
l �
I
I
Y
❑ Show to whom, date. and address of del iter•.._•
i
Show to whom and dale delivered .......... —s
RESTRICTED DELIVERY.
Show to whom, date, and address of dclir fir•. $—
(CONSOLT POSTMASTER FOR FE5)
III
O
2. ARTICLE ADDRESSED 7�//�.Ff
I,
I
a
I
I
i
I h»'e rreeis' I article described above.
I t
I
I
i
i
L
POST NJ
I
I
' - rAv:rt L... ' r
.tet
• 331 S. Jormscs
ra7c 2
Ycra will )Ism rirclty (90) cay5 after receipt of tFit::r-.tira to correct
the&% 6CfiCiC;-4if::a. At that ti+x• z rLi .-yc:tion ;,rill 1;o^_c,arriai Out to
ir'Ta-C Ccacl Ca-.23innce.
ald ycra ITiah to contest arct., of these orr:c-ra, ya s written tk tt ian
ra- ,=-.ting a ro:sing lvfore the ;iousi.ng 7• i> els rcx-ml rest L -e ruo'_A%*CK]
ir. t.o Cffiao of the City 0 --ml, llitlin ter. (10) Bays Of mar ic_ of t)Lis
notico. ycL- notition for a i_enri:x.; mist briefly stale the cro:'e4 for
your I: w7i hive vry E, `tions, plea:,-_ fee!] tree to cz11 Baring
In;�ectir+n at 35411POG, extension 314 or 34F.
SL-urscly,
D. -L -n }:Dc51cr
):wsLrl
);jgiC-1.1
, BEST
p0C1)1AEN'TT
B5
at
a SENDER: Cunpletenens 1,-, and 3.
Add your addreu in the ••RFTURN TO" space on
mer:.
I. The following sers'icis ra(uested (check one). �
Ll- ow to whom and date delivered..........
❑ Show to whom, date. and address of del iter•.._•
E] RESTRICTED DELIVERY
Show to whom and dale delivered .......... —s
RESTRICTED DELIVERY.
Show to whom, date, and address of dclir fir•. $—
(CONSOLT POSTMASTER FOR FE5)
III
O
2. ARTICLE ADDRESSED 7�//�.Ff
3. ARTICLE DESCRIPTION: a
REGISTERED NO. CERTIFIED N0. INSURED NO.
I (AlweYa ahNin aipnemn of eddntw or ewnsl
I h»'e rreeis' I article described above.
SIGNATOR Addressee ❑ Aulh d agecnnl
a. DAT OF DELIVERY
POST NJ
7
G
S. ADDRESS (Complete only if nauested)
6. UNABLE TO DELIVER BECAUSE'
LCRI�
,IALS
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS. DES MOIIIES
n
I
ORDER TO CORRECT CONDITION OF PREMISES
CITY U� 10\/VA CITY
CIVIC CENTER 410 E. WASHINGTON ST. IOWA CITY IOWA 52240 (319) 354.180D
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND INSPECTION SERVICES
Au,lir,t 22, 1979
WI' 1. !11'. .1 TO
11r, scnald s riffbl
320 S. Joti+i_.wn ;;tenet
ia4zt CiL: ,=r..;:a 5,2240
SERVICE OF NOTICE
DATE ' L ' , -• 1
DELt1'IAED TO,/ `/ ) /1
ey / t -f_ L i
IlOUSING INSPECTION DIVISION
^c: 3 c3r.•llin7 unfits (C,:cCpt 3rd rom frrr. seat saro.•ri flror mxt)s si,le)
lacwtri at 320-22 S..Wnn_cs.•s
ASliS L-1:`,:tC.1a:: l:•L^ CC;):7'J'_trd as a:::.';rat='i caS 'rr-rr, -i_ r vay
11a•:C orcorret :1lle to t110 stnrx'ic c* r.ursm:ti effe.tz withLa all F.r•_llinj LIDits
i ie a1xa'a 11str2.' ,.rrla:rty ims'irx;-,cc c9 m T�r1uL't 17, VM, 17 Davi . lra : lor>n,
1:ousina Z^ ,x ta., inti rt^.nt of Hou -sing in! Ins. cw tion :'erric:r.-. ^:a follrwini
it --,r, are ti.olatAorz of (l zt•r 17 c`. the Muni
ci,,1 Can of Zc;a City aa -1 arc
h4xc'rf brcrxll?t to ?aur nttraation for correc+..icn:
1. Chapter MCI.11.A. Dad: o' Valid miltinle (?.rllirr rr_a:it.
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES
B
a.
ita =c -ars that thm-c c;..ell rem
; it; are beim o; rratti? r:itamt ri
rslti?i^_ n L•1li-*s•; jrX it.
2.
I
0..aptcr
17-7(f). --fectivc electrical s -ata^.
j
a.
ih-timu of th3 t:ort`: arJ r^.:th -mets of t?r_ stn:ctare i u lt: in;, `alt
i
srt li-itei to, a c ar?s s'axr:; :-�r_-_r 0.:cilir., rrdt are torl.ally t:it1ic-ut
1
el Ctixlr.ity,
rririr, so:: h 1 c o nt at Vic coil i r,• ; duc :,at^ -r hCater.
C.
Mat`s first a•:.' .;+^_ floc= ia:• tc: say rririsn.
g
I!.
:sisninr1 cam -DI-te n••:--urd floc+r rcuth ^iia :;<s&m.vst rm .
r.
;'ia�tin.7 ar:er,7late first Clacir n::_-tsr.,w^t �r+t.
north sire :rural vpliaa: in raft wir in•;in t31c furnace
s
ro•-n.
p.
Scnonl floor rvnt2I I.aaJ,rcm o7.x_rplatr it tax:; on.
i 3.
Oiarkrr Tack c° ra7uirr_ olc_trical light sfitci.
e
a.
:X?CC.T! r_lror S'?'.it11 nit'c first rct- cn!5t of tic tdt-xvxnn h?_.^n, no rwitdnwd
BEST
'-i^_'st•
DOCUMENT
h.
S.aas tla r rYa l si:1c s i�r,•_st rrrr, lac1:s a ra:itd:_t: light.
1�V11ILAgI,�;
I
c.
rc:--m-3 flc»r r^.=Us ni��, nort:lnn. t roc. lac':n a 1.:itc1:c0 light.
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES
B
- r
i�l". i.Caal'1 lit"LL[0, 317-i
22, 1n7C
i . m4o
4. C. -:iter 17-:(C) Lwntc,:y mt r,nai:c3 i^. toilet ros..
a. 1;t4)Cnt (f:ittl) tlr ^- ,tr»l h::; m) lm.%Itcrf
5. Ma,- .r 17-7(r) hcn;>:.cy =tr.x:turer mt ;:rajerly
P. pct rorci s:x:t`n.r-_t corm --r the ro,Lj'!:tion 'has ! ttlel nolo.; the cx+rch
vont.
17-7(a) Fou-rlation rot mintai aC in a ,00l state of rgair-
r.. LYac•e:? frnry ::tion 1-1Y U) i! r---isrxst corm.
7• O ip=Cr 17-7(i.) a-L-w-It.er Crui74 'C a t- 7t 1taL1tT_i7}^j In a t X1i &tLte
o: rtr,vdr.
a. i:ic�raa-tc tumw =it at the ccrt],;ast mr..er of t.: t xuture.
b. '!issir; ton'r_rtor art! duo ns_x:
n
j BEST
i DOCUMENT
AVAILABLE
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 1.101NES
27., 197!'
r•:a: � �lar�,
13.
Cha -ter 17-:. (,) l lec?: of rs:uir«?
iA.
rao.-.l flour r1G cirle vast arin vii sett i fra-r3 is 3v_:,L on L-vth
=fiat -3.
h. Fi--t ficor, south :ii ?x, t.:a risting scral:s.
C. First floor, cat sire, two ,nissin ; screeno.
d. Four nirnLr.3 tore-rs r_nrta side first floor.
14.
7-r.(a)tmac, of privacy in t m•1 ct rrs.
ClstYr 17-;.(!C)
a. until 3ida, first floor, toilet ?z- as door.
15.
Cm -ter 17-7(a) wineat;s net rr:intain d in a ani state of repair.
South nor .rJ ail:aa as ro:en in scar local-.>n_v.
I_ rust side of first flo.-rr the Stall s paire win:io;r is hrr9;cn.
C. re -5t a -c nt win's is :)rck.rr•. (scJt)c sire).
c, rx'cp-e _`lour myth rmst roma t_:o rr.,rt-h vin.1-s:r is brrd:e.•a.
16.
C.va to 9.30.!'.2.(,3) Ire: of rv:uirti wrdrails.
s.r..^oo :: floor, s�rr3a :rice, t`..e ha11 c?uart?rail is 24" high.
rrxt?a side, the !-.±ll rnardrail is 2:" laigia.
3.7.
G a-L^.s 9.30.11.L. 1a6: of ra uirr_^ is of tion zur heat ias3 unit^.
a. 1Oti YfUriv.,ce rrrrl i,n Xarcrto larve m furreace isolation.
h. Sou hTu n:= a nn^ .., a r� to hxrc no `_n, nca isolation.
1E.
rSa:yrs g.30.11.??. FV -.Iia an ti mL rninmi+r9 in sanitary Munition.
I�
r.. Smtl, hallwmy 1r±fiman first ani scar' flrrsr is dirty.
i^.
,te 17-10(tI lzc:: of rcco;:1ary ear ss.
f
=. '.aat'; s cmul fIoc.r ,i Alin; unit n:1 clrs to ,-at to h:r:a
11
etre r.
21).
E,'^.a Ker 17-7(x) T final r-aint-Snc-1 in a 9ao1 sate of rol air.
A. cv:atiha..:_r.L or fra-c is broten loose.
21.
Manlr_r 17-7(a) Collin7s not ry-intai c-! in. a K?)6 rtaw.. of r� >air.
firer. rc--,j c.n= of tP . 9.ar:Y'.!'r'. tha roiI LY,
Alat:t^r is
li. F*k=r.^. :l Mr, south side, hitt? en cnilin7 is CYSC✓.n•1.
+
9
c. front (ane nt) Frnr.1h Ole crilir3� Brat is Feeling.
th.: ^oat: first flour egc?lliYJ Im-dt the in
e. F uth GlC3, ;first floor, t'tilC r+?.cai-1 Torsi f m. tae %P..nt loan rra&.aY3 ant
)'rll7irv7 plaster.
j BEST
i DOCUMENT
AVAILABLE
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 1.101NES
u
a A
I
i
I
+
'�I
l
S.
,�.Tiat 22, 1975
Pa:,o rrahr
22. C7.a.;trs 17-5(n)(1) Jad. cf rr.,ar•; t-omti3:t_4h.
a. lb --ti hethros+ wit?:.:lt .: wirriv:r has no vc:lt fan.
b. ''cxlth W-c-innt 1>;tlrtr 1 wiLlmt a ha_ ilo vent fan.
23. Cla.tcr 17-4(c) J.l,.ato:y ryA- oo.ntainc�; in a toilet rrr...
a. :;ath I sr at ct7ol his na lavatory to it.
24. Cna-1tcr 17-4.(11) rxrfcctive t h iAi7v1.
r_. in tie E_+ath Nine-'mt, t:e se.car lirr_ :r.;st of th+, e_:cazr hums a
pia? ^.issim Lrai the ^•a �.
floor, fiJt7 sirL^, the bathroa.: tmb fa:r.:.t is lellAnn.
C. cQS:ne"..t, mrtl side the 34tS:::e.n faucacts Ie -1I:.
r. Pirst floor, r/.Y.1th siie, t-.^. kitd+m sin): C1ra:Lm;
e. First `Icrar, scut1 sire, thn lavatc=v Birk fa rcet; in i.e
hathrom are leaking.
25. Chapter 17-7(h)(1) InTic 1tvite of nlu:i)ilr.,?.
a. 6eme..:ioor, so•.rth sillo lnt',ttb fill symt allcws
2., 1;.a7trs 17-5.(h)(5) Zad: of Brit controls.
a. mre L 1» e, twsion on tlx :.etcr he, z
T_ relief valve to
with12 Lr_ f,- of t`;n floor int thom--Ci I:aaz-crk_nt :;+_ter
lr:?ter.
27. C+apvter 17-5(h)(3) Irrrr;,7ar vontim. frm ly''Itirvg unit.
a. At t -he north bau—:lerlt location the >..+OSr1 stove vont is not
seala•l.
28. MzTjter 9.30.17.11* Clam.: or storage inner stair,:avr
a. 7+t the with first floor nr.it iLmlarrlcatl the n tairr, in the
living roan. taerc is storauO.
29. ('nantrr 7.30.7.1:. 1:xtarior xo4 rrurfam: lwt pre,: r_ctra L5j p -,int or
otY2 frotecti'✓C' c.,:ati7T.
P. rirtions of t:rt m%tl rior Nm -a rv-int or mo paint
Moth Era N rely rritlfirA t.vnt the list[d pro -4: y will be plBIC: 1Z 3
rs unfit for yu-an oIdtati.orl r.i:N'ty (i.7) after%'1�1'1^C of thiE
rsatio-.� mleas tlx violation_ cite,: atm✓, arc corrr-&jA h,+forr_ thet ti,. -v..
'Mir action trill !.c tE';Cn 171 the j'nusL^:7 Zns,'�tion Offft - 4i1':Cr t}`/i
a::tlrrri_ation e` Crantcr 17-11 of the runicipa1 Code of Sa 1 47Aty.
BEST
DOCUMENT,
AVAILABLE
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES hI01NES
4•
'9'. L'.r_",ki i;rig*j,�� 3 C -i2 S. .io::.^.a�; t �.•�
:: Trost 1-7, 177 ( )
17.3-70 f i. -e
I'C f11rt.?1ar a_virL%] of eii:
21Dta03, ter1:11ts On the um.1se3 ::ill :x P'O1T i {...itl CYacrs t0 :•uCdi.0 an
prc-A19e3 'Yr Cn ^tr:•r 17-11.(c) of t,c ;?a i•:i0z1 C(Y;n.
%rr-' )r�r on affecta) ty .MT ratios v4aic'.1 has 8ecn ir1,Uc l ir azn; motion
L?itl: IJ
:e C'lforix:X_•n: [)° an 31' -w -i :im of t`Ii.R Cl',a for rzrj r�:).nf,t•, d.?•:
shall No nrantarl, a )=rkn a-1 the r..attrr before iho na-ssim T;}lcals
rc=,; nrovi3a3 that such )'+ersOn OV111 file in t e Office of t*•e City
Cher: a written petition ra;.x.sti,,3 -SLC 1 rr arL-g aryl settim forkil a
Of t}'.e C,-- 1'. 1.33 thcINfOre ?:it in te, GO days after
dntc the Mrtiw ves 1:crvav2.
Ii f011 )1-;'h? a.,V G^,.*sLionG .•O11 ray cY};lt'Sc, t?•.c' 1:O'.-iir:� irs:*_rtion Cfffce
Civic Center, 410 Z, -t ? ashi:r tcn (354-1V0, cdLnsions 345 cr
345).
Sino -'rely,
� Se.•licr i'oufn; Ins;.ector
J
David L4C- ! alo w
' I:(7u.7i1�, 2n.ry n?r:tOr
)
i
t
0
BEST
. DOCUMF,NT
AVMLABLU
I
r
i
i
r
MICROFILMED BY
{ JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES II0111ES
i
t
. f.
ORDER TO CORRECT OF PREMISES
C]TYCONDITION
CSF IOWA CITY
CIV ,',: CKER 410 E. WASHINGTON ST. IOWA CITY IOWA 52240 (319) 354.180
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND INSPECTION SERVICES
July 26, 197E s�
11oTICr or VInLGTTm^
I
Ron Johnson
7.19 F. Renton
Iowa City, Towa 52.24n
I
PF: 3 F. garrison/514 S. Capitol
j
Dcar llr. Johnson:
i
The above Iisted property was inspected on Jn1y 19,1078, by Pamela S.
Barnes, Rousing Inspector, Department of Housing and Inspection Services.
She folloving ite-is are violations of Chanter 9.30 of the Punicipal Code
of Iowa City and are hereby brnuvbt to.your attention for correction:
i ..
1. 0.30.5.C.l.b. Lack of required screens.
174 J? a. Door at 3 E. Narrison, torn on south We.
440 - 2. 9.30.4.I.2.b. Lack of required banarail.
— F Lac4.of handrail on.soutbweat exterior steps. ,
3. 9.30.7.A. Steps not naintainLA in a,}zood state of repair.
✓a. Cement steps off of 5n4 S. Canitnl have deteriorated.—
4. 9.30.10.0. LncV.. of adequate fire protection.
a. Lack of fire extinguishers at 3 r. Perri=on.
5. 9.30.10.P.. Lacl: of smoke detector.
a. Leek of fire detector in each unit, Dr -m 0-267-1
6. ^.30.10.r... t+entinr units lacl•. fire protection.
D � .a. Lack of heating Unit isolation for furnace and lint water
7s/)7 heater.
7. 0.30.10.T. Lack of two approved grans of egress.
✓a. I•ack of evress nn second floor.
BEST
DOCUMENT
AVAILABLPR
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES IIOIIIES
City ul i.r.e City
DEPARTMENT OF MOUSING AND INSPECTION SER910ES
C DNOLOGICAL RECORD OF ENFORCE NT
DATE
ACTIVITY AND REMARKS
IJUMDcF
INIiALS
JUL 31153
r
�
Y. J�� �1 tui rt
T, 1r�1
�I idtpJ'
/va
a6,
L �7;,y
CDsB
i So
�
PSS•••
30
—27-7Q
REJ1V L
O�✓c Vi carr. RE
c J
11V 7'0
AP7. �?
3
,-3D-7
gr /v
F �o�P • rAJ ec
ANo Rw2
r
Q
i_
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 1401tJES
i
w
i
i,
i
i'
I`I
I:
I
ron .Tol, 3 r:
.nson,;rrison
.7 -Iv 16, 1978
rare 7.
R. 9.3n.7.I. Floor surfaces not raintained in a rensona?,ly innervIous
con?ition.
a. 3 r. 'Tarrison, tile nissinr in hitcher..
9. 9.30.5.r.. Lack of aAegnnte ventilation.
P6
p Y a. 504 A, bathroom lacks ventilation.
in. 7.30.7.1. Floor enrfeces not maintained in a reasonably irpervinus
condition.
504 A, bathroom the broken.
7/.29%7) b. 3 F. 3arrison, tile brnl:eR__JQatbronn.
i
7
11. 9.30.7.A.3. Interior gall not raintained properly.
a. 504 P, hallvay, broken plaster.
h. 504 B, kitchen, hole in ceiling.
i-: 12. 9.3n.E.F. Inuroper use of extension cords.
A. 3 F. T'arrison, extension cord-rnnnirg from livinc roor to
bedroom.
13, 0.30.7.F.2. Lack of required electrical outlet.
`.
6rtfB.d71;f/77
—tea. 504 A., ?dtcben ceiling light not secured.
l!, f id, y b. 504 B, hall light fixture faulty.
C. 5.0.4 P., lltchen nisslnr coverplate on outlet.
You will have ninety (90) days after receint of this notice to correct
these deficiencies. At that tire a reinspection will he carried out to
Insure code cornliance.
Should yet, wish to content any of theee or,ers, your written pet tion
requesting a Fenrinr before the llousing,, Anpeals Poard Host he received,
in the Office of the City Clerl: within ten (1() drys of service of this
notice. Your Petition for a nenrinr rn:st briefly state the grounds for
your appeal. If you have any questions, please feel free to call Uousinr
Inspection at 354-78n0, extension inn or 314.
Sincerely,
r
Panels S. I+arnes
Tlousinc: Inspector
JT -0/19 BEST
DOCUMENT
AVAILABLE
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOI LIES
Ir
I
1
Ii
J
I
j
I
1
1
I
I
i
I
r
IL 9
I
@P
I
p
1
k
1
�
CITY OF IOWA CITY �.
CIVIC CENTER 410 E. WASHINGTON ST - IOWA CITY IOWA 52240 • (319) 354.180
AGENDA OF PROPERTIES
Council Tour
October 15, 1979
7� 1:30 - 624 N. Linn - Iva Hilleman - Manager T az
o7- 2:00 - 915 E. Washington - Willie Wulf -Manager
3 - 2:30 - 331 5. Johnson - Robert Bender - Owner
y- 2:50 - 320-322.S. Johnson - Donald Griffin - Owner
,f
-3:00 - 3 E. Harrison - Ron Johnson - Owner
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOINES
I
1
i1
I
1
1
I
I
i
I
I
3
7� 1:30 - 624 N. Linn - Iva Hilleman - Manager T az
o7- 2:00 - 915 E. Washington - Willie Wulf -Manager
3 - 2:30 - 331 5. Johnson - Robert Bender - Owner
y- 2:50 - 320-322.S. Johnson - Donald Griffin - Owner
,f
-3:00 - 3 E. Harrison - Ron Johnson - Owner
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOINES
M .
kit it I it t rile,_
lar.) z rccn
trll rc,_.a. F! fl-" j
.ic*r a "i put
J.
xnr tr in
no stynnoTCS? .1-311-it1q,
cl-le mla of 1.4
witr
rao C1 1. On
Ad ra 1.�cvn�l cal el 1
r.
to
'Xirst Fl,=:
"N 'T
t�jj:Let ro—.1 in, dlr,
Mll lit,,'ati'vT 1.0 f_ln
17
lo
DOCUMENT
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOMES
L
h-nFj e, skylichi-.
no mtr.Ac, alarm
no fica a=ca:.e.
cvalv wcly '--:: a cj- is
A: C.
.fn*n F'.1;v
is
Ln re _-.—a L:
baUvwv c3jy.!
rrans tba.e I w. h-35,
oavr
kL—C, mxc. zead i.up o=.* }kla4lllG Sift
MIX
JM
all. Et'. CICA
ir.-Lil. is daliwaxrt in ax, ('rem 1-o)c lA-:7h sloi.9
f
ST
'DOVJM'
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES
a,.
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES
I
(`car r-issirr"
pzoblem,
lrj rvallC for d
RX'o'c-3 C'-', (IcKjo
d'Oor'Ll
at:
at�.r 3,?Vj..
cloAlmj
110
llo .:A.Zat
w Zl
'nya 1.)e-mr.-aL
DOCUMENT
AVAILABLE
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES
I
M I
M
h,
ix, 5L-ro
aa,
'"n Azl�wo
7kfar 1.
Water
t.
F"113i 2�7 on,12
lv)i
/BEST
DOCUMENT
AVAILABLE
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOVIES
dr"., -m nv+l
M
h,
ix, 5L-ro
aa,
'"n Azl�wo
7kfar 1.
Water
t.
F"113i 2�7 on,12
lv)i
/BEST
DOCUMENT
AVAILABLE
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOVIES