HomeMy WebLinkAbout1978-11-14 Ordinance1
Mir 6itur iU4Lu by JOR14 HICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS AND DE
ORDINANCE NO. 78-2930
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ZONING ORDINANCE 2238 BY
CHANGING THE USE REGULATIONS OF CERTAIN
PROPERTY FROM R1A TO RIB &R2
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
IOWA CITY, IOWA:
Section 1. The property described below is hereby
reclassified from its present classification of
R1A and the boundaries of RIB
as in icated upon the Zoning Map of the City o
Iowa City, Iowa, shall be enlarged to include the
following property, to -wit:
------ Commencing as a point of reference at the Northeast corner of the
Northwest quarter of Section 23, Township 79 North, Range 6 West of
the Fifth Principal Meridian, Iowa City, Johnson County, Iowa;
thence South 10 391 10" East 375,40 feet to a point of intersection
with centerline Station 222 + 12.6 of U.S, Highway 16 Bypass (this is
an assumed bearing for purposes of, this description only); thence South
00 011 03" East 150.00 feet to a point; thence North 890 271 4411 East
50.00 feet to a point of intersection with the easterly right-of-way
line of Sycamore Street, saidpoint being 150.00 feet normally distant
from the centerline of said U.S. Highway 16 Bypass; thence South 00 011 03"
East 403.07 feet along said easterly right-of-way line of Sycamore Street
to a point; thence South 890 581 5711 West 15,00 feet along said easterly
right-of-way line of Sycamore Street to a point; thence South 00 O1' 03"
East 246.93 feet along said easterly right-of-way line of Sycamore Street
to a point; thence North 890 58' 57" East 200.00 feet to point beginning of
tract herein described; thence South 00 011 03" East 200.00 feet to a point
of intersection with the northerly line of Mount Prospect Addition Part 3,
Iowa City, Iowa; thence South 590 581 00" Fast 135.00 feet along said
northerly line of Mount Prospect Addition Part 3 to a point; thence North
840 251 10" East 135.00 feet along said northerly line of Mount Prospect
Addition Part 3 to a point; thence North 870 55' 20" East 268.00 feet
along said northerly line of Mount Prospect Addition Part 3 to a point;
thence North 880 591 2711 East 263.00 feet along said northerly line of
Mount Prospect Addition Part 3 to a point; thence North 00 011 08" East
480.00 feet along the westerly line of said Mount Prospect Addition Part 3
to a point; thence South 880 591 27" West 125.00 feet to a point; thence
South 340 23' 0211 West 79.72 feet to a point; thence South 880 591 27"
West 120.00 feet to a point; thence South 00 011 08" West 96.00 feet to a
point; thence South 81 561 0011 West 319.00 feet to a point; thence South
550 371 23" West 51.36 feet to a point; thence South 890 58' 57" West 134.00
feet to.point of beginning; and containing 6.2 acres, more or less.
141CROI IL14ED BY ,}
JORM MICR�LAB
CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES
Ree.^.ived & App-ovod
By The Legal Department
61'�+dp nwti
208
1-i�,Wr ib'ILu by JURM 141CROLAB
Ordinance No. 78-2930
Page 2
CEDAR RAPIDS AND
In addition, the property described below is hereby
reclassified from its present classification of RIA and
the boundaries of R2 as indicated upon the Zoning Map
of the City of Iowa City, Iowa, shall be enlarged to
include the following prooerty, to -wit:
Commencing as a point of reference at the Northeast corner of the
Northwest quarter of Section 23, Township 70 North, Range 6 West
of the Fifth Principal Meridian, Iowa City, Johnson County, Iowa;
thence South 10 39' 10" East 375.40 feet to a point of intersection
with the centerline station 222 + 12.6 of U.S. Highway 06 Bypass
(this is an assumed bearing for purpose of this description only);
thence South 00 01' 03" East 150.00 feet to a point; thence North
890 27' 44" East 50.00 feet to a point of intersection with the
easterly right-of-way line of Sycamore Street, said point being
150.00 feet normally distant from the centerline of said U.S. Highway
06 Bypass and point of beginning of tract herein described; thence
South 00 O1' 03" East 403.07 feet along said easterly right-of-way
line of Sycamore Street to a point; thence South 890 58' 57" West
15.00 feet along said easterly right-of-way line of Sycamore Street
to a point; thence South 00 01' 03" East 246.93 feet along said
easterly right-of-way line of Sycawre Street to a point; thence North 890
58' S7" East 334.00 feet to a point; thence North 550 37' 23" East 51.36
feet to a point; thence North 810 56' 00" East 319.00 feet to a point;
thence North 00 011 08" East 96.00 feet to a point; thence North 880
59' 27" East 120.00 feet to a point; thence North 340 23' 02" East
79.72 feet to a point; thence North 880 59' 2711 East 125.00 feet to
the Northwest corner of Lot 157, Mount Prospect Addition Part 3,
Iowa City, Iowa; thence North 880 591 27" East 125.00 feet along
the northerly line of said Mount Prospect Addition Part 3 to a point;
thence North 140 511 23" East 128.00 feet along said northerly line
of Mount Prospect Addition Part 3 to a point; thence South 520 51' 00"
East 50.00 feet along said northerly line of Mount prospect Addition
Part 3 to a point; thence North 240 281 04" East 150.00 feet along
said northerly line of Mount Prospect Addition Part 3 to point of
intersection with the southerly right-of-way line of said U.S.
Highway 06 Bypass; thence Northwesterly 140.51 feet along a 2,715 foot
radius curve concave southwesterly, said line being said southerly
right-of-way line of U.S. Highway 06 Bypass to a point; thence North
880 261 29" West 688.28 feet along said southerly right-of-way line of
U.S. Highway 06 Bypass to a point; thence North 30 20' 2411 East
110.00 feet along said southerly right-of-way line of U.S. Highway
06 Bypass to a point; thence Westerly 183.75 feet along a 2,715 foot
radius curve concave southerly, said line being said southerly 0 ght-
of- way line of U.S. Highway 06 Bypass to a point; thence South 890
27' 44" West 229.51 feet along said southerly right-of-way line of
U.S. Highway 06 Bypass to the point of beginning; and containing 12.4
acres, more or less.
141CROFILI-E0 BY ;•1
DORM MICR#LAB
CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES
i
-i
i
i
1-i�,Wr ib'ILu by JURM 141CROLAB
Ordinance No. 78-2930
Page 2
CEDAR RAPIDS AND
In addition, the property described below is hereby
reclassified from its present classification of RIA and
the boundaries of R2 as indicated upon the Zoning Map
of the City of Iowa City, Iowa, shall be enlarged to
include the following prooerty, to -wit:
Commencing as a point of reference at the Northeast corner of the
Northwest quarter of Section 23, Township 70 North, Range 6 West
of the Fifth Principal Meridian, Iowa City, Johnson County, Iowa;
thence South 10 39' 10" East 375.40 feet to a point of intersection
with the centerline station 222 + 12.6 of U.S. Highway 06 Bypass
(this is an assumed bearing for purpose of this description only);
thence South 00 01' 03" East 150.00 feet to a point; thence North
890 27' 44" East 50.00 feet to a point of intersection with the
easterly right-of-way line of Sycamore Street, said point being
150.00 feet normally distant from the centerline of said U.S. Highway
06 Bypass and point of beginning of tract herein described; thence
South 00 O1' 03" East 403.07 feet along said easterly right-of-way
line of Sycamore Street to a point; thence South 890 58' 57" West
15.00 feet along said easterly right-of-way line of Sycamore Street
to a point; thence South 00 01' 03" East 246.93 feet along said
easterly right-of-way line of Sycawre Street to a point; thence North 890
58' S7" East 334.00 feet to a point; thence North 550 37' 23" East 51.36
feet to a point; thence North 810 56' 00" East 319.00 feet to a point;
thence North 00 011 08" East 96.00 feet to a point; thence North 880
59' 27" East 120.00 feet to a point; thence North 340 23' 02" East
79.72 feet to a point; thence North 880 59' 2711 East 125.00 feet to
the Northwest corner of Lot 157, Mount Prospect Addition Part 3,
Iowa City, Iowa; thence North 880 591 27" East 125.00 feet along
the northerly line of said Mount Prospect Addition Part 3 to a point;
thence North 140 511 23" East 128.00 feet along said northerly line
of Mount Prospect Addition Part 3 to a point; thence South 520 51' 00"
East 50.00 feet along said northerly line of Mount prospect Addition
Part 3 to a point; thence North 240 281 04" East 150.00 feet along
said northerly line of Mount Prospect Addition Part 3 to point of
intersection with the southerly right-of-way line of said U.S.
Highway 06 Bypass; thence Northwesterly 140.51 feet along a 2,715 foot
radius curve concave southwesterly, said line being said southerly
right-of-way line of U.S. Highway 06 Bypass to a point; thence North
880 261 29" West 688.28 feet along said southerly right-of-way line of
U.S. Highway 06 Bypass to a point; thence North 30 20' 2411 East
110.00 feet along said southerly right-of-way line of U.S. Highway
06 Bypass to a point; thence Westerly 183.75 feet along a 2,715 foot
radius curve concave southerly, said line being said southerly 0 ght-
of- way line of U.S. Highway 06 Bypass to a point; thence South 890
27' 44" West 229.51 feet along said southerly right-of-way line of
U.S. Highway 06 Bypass to the point of beginning; and containing 12.4
acres, more or less.
141CROFILI-E0 BY ;•1
DORM MICR#LAB
CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES
r9iIWl iLMLu BY JORM MICROL.AB
Ordinance No. 78-2930
Page 3
CEDAR RAPIDS AND
as requested by Frantz Construction Company, Inc., located
south of Hwy. 06 Bypass and east of Sycamore Street.
(Mt. Prospect Addition, Part 4.)
Section 2. The building inspector is hereby authorized
and directed to change the Zoning Map of the City of
Iowa City, Iowa, to conform to this amendment upon final
passage, approval and publication of this Ordinance as
provided by law.
Section 3. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and
directed to certify a copy of this Ordinance to the County
Recorder of Johnson County, Iowa, upon final passage,
approval and publication as provided by law.
Passed and approved this 14th day of November , 1978.
MAYOR
ATTEST: ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
It was moved by Balmer and seconded by Roberts
that the Ordinance a adopte , and upon roll ca t erewere:
AYES: NAYS: ABSENT:
x
x
X _
x
x _
BALMER
dePROSSE
ERDAHL
NEUHAUSER
PERRET
ROBERTS
VEVERA
First consideration 10/31/78
Vote for passage: Ayes: Erdahl, Neuhauser, Perret, Roberts,
Vevera, Balmer, deProsse. Nays: none
Second consideration 11/7/78
Vote for passage: -Ay—e-s--7613rosse, Erdahl, Neuhauser, Perret,
Roberts, Vevera, Balmer. Nays: none.
RI(.CI;iV�n G• F" Ai.iv.atiT
Date of publication November 22, 1978 m 7 L;^VGAL
s1 6
T''HICROf ILMED OY
JORM MICR+LAB
! CEDAR RAPIDS „ DES MOINES
1.1rwWr iL;•iLU by Jukil MICROLAb
CEDAR RAPIDS AND DE
City of Iowa City
lam -MEMORANDUM
DATE: October 13, 1978
TO: Planning and Zoning Commission
FROM: Dennis R. Kraft, Director of Planning and Program Development
RE: Application to Rezone Mount Prospect Addition, Part IV
Frantz Construction Company, Inc. submitted an application in August of 1975 to
rezone a 31.5 acre tract of land from an RIA Zone to RIB and R2 Zones. The
application was denied by the City Council in December of 1975 because there were
insufficient votes to approve the application by the required extra -ordinary
majority vote. The applicant subsequently submitted an application to rezone a
part of the 31.5 acre tract from an RIA Zone to.an RIB Zone which was approved by
the City Council in May of 1976. Finally, the applicant submitted an application
to rezone the remaining 18.5 acres from an RIA Zone to RIB and R2 Zones. Since
it did not appear that there was sufficient capacity in the sanitary sewer system
serving this area for RIB size lots, the Council deferred consideration of the
application until both a final plat of the subject area and the rezoning
application could be considered at the same meeting.
A final plat for the 18.5 acre tract has now been submitted for consideration by
the Planning and Zoning Commission (See Staff Report S-7727). The application
to rezone this tract has been "reactivated" and would necessarily have to be
considered prior to approval of the final plat as the lot sizes illustrated do
not comply with the existing RIA zoning.
The initial staff report developed by the staff in consideration of the request to
rezone the total 31.5 acres tract is attached for your review in consideration of
rezoning the remaining 18.5 acre tract. The staff's recommendation at that time
was for approval of the application for the reasons indicated in the report.
Subsequently, however, the Comprehensive Plan was adopted. The Comprehensive Plan
Map shows this area being developed at a density of 2-8 dwelling units per acre.
The request of the applicant is to rezone part of the area to an R2 Single and Two
Family Zone which permits an overall density of approximately 14 dwelling units
per acre. The R2 Zone, therefore, would not be consistent with the Comprehensive
Plan Map. The overall density proposed for the 18.5 acre tract, however, is one
unit per 7040 square feet of land area which is approximately 5 units per acre,
and is consistent with the provisions of the Comprehensive Plan. If the recommenda-
tions of the Comprehensive Plan are to be followed, the rezoning request must be
evaluated simultaneously with, and directly tied to the subdivision plat approval.
Conversely, the rezoning of part of the subject property to R2 without some
additional form of density through platting control could result in this area
being developed to a density of up to 14 dwelling units per acre. If this were
to occur, it would exceed the density prescribed by the Comprehensive Plan.
DRK/ssw
Attachment
MICROFILMED BY .�
JORM MICR+LAB
CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES
2092
Fli u<Ur iLi•liu by JURM 141CROLAB
• CEDAR RAPIDS AND DCS .I , IEC, InD1.
I STAFF REPORT
Planning & Zoning Commission
September 11, 1975
i
SUBJECT: Z-7505. Application submitted by
Frantz Construction Co., Inc. to
rezone a tract of land located
south of Highway 6 Bypass and
east of Sycamore Street from an RIA Zone to an RIB Zone and R2 Zone; date
filed: 8/14/75; 45 -day limitation: 9/19/75.
STAFF In a preliminary Staff Report
ANALYSIS: dated August 14, 1975, it was
indicated that even if the subject
31.5 acre tract was developed for
single family residential use at lot sizes equivalent to RIA, existing sewers
could not handle anticipated additional sewage flows without surcharging.
Obviously, any further consideration for rezoning the property to permit a
higher density of development was redundant pending a complete analysis of
the capacity of the existing sewers.
The Engineering Division has in conjunction with Shive-Hattery and Associates,
engineers for the applicant, resolved that reserve capacity within the
sewers, sufficient to accommodate additional sewage flows, exists. Their
analysis, which will be explained later in detail, and the following analysis
are predicated upon the number of lots illustrated on the preliminary plat
of Mount Prospect Addition, Part 3, copies of which are enclosed herewith
"-� to the Commission.
The applicant has petitioned to rezone the northern 13.3 acres of the 31.5
acre tract to an R2 Zone for 41 duplex lots or 82 duplex units, an average
of 6.2 units per acre, and the southern 18.2 acres to an RIB Zone for 74
single family lots, an average of 4.1 units per acre. In combination, 156
dwelling units on 31.5 acres would result in an average overall density of
five units per acre. Or in terms of lot sizes, assuming a net reduction
in gross land area of 20 percent for street area, the duplex lots would
average approximately 11,300 square feet and the single family lots would
average approximately 8,570 square feet. An overall average lot size per
dwelling unit of approximately 7,040 square feet or a density of five units
per acre is not'inconsistent with the adjacent developed additions of Hollywood
Manor, Mount Prospect and Fairmeadows zoned RIB and R2.
The R2 Two Family Residence Zone is intended to provide for single family
dwellings and duplexes or two single family attached dwellings. These two
residential land uses in combination with each other are quite compatible
as evidenced in the Westminster Street and Cornell Avenue area comprised
of medium to high quality residential dwellings, the large area zoned R2 in
the Longfellow School District and along North Governor Street, and the
Taylor Drive area located within close proximity to the subject tract. In
planning theory, it is argued that neighborhoods made up of an intermixture
nof nddtheylng haveypes are more tha practicellnteresting advantage of enabling layfamily to, more cmeet yits
tisfying
changing housing needs as it grows without having to leave the neighborhood.
7 MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICR+LAE
CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES
A
f
7 MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICR+LAE
CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES
A
wtUl ILMLu by JURM NICRULAb
-2-
L'LDAR RAPIDS AND DC
Not withstanding from a land use perception, the Staff is inclined to consider
the proposed rezoning to an R2 Zone an appropriate amendment to the Zoning
Code. However, an area of concern to the Staff is the burden which might
be placed upon the Grantwood Elementary School in increased pupil enrollment
presumably proportionate to a comparative increase in the density of
development.
According to the Superintendent of the Iowa City Community School District,
Mr. Merlin Ludwig, the Grantwood School, which is located south of the
subject tract, was expanded two years ago to accommodate a maximum of 500
pupils, the most efficient operating level. This fall 403 students have
been enrolled from areas both north and south of Highway 6 Bypass, but when
the number of students reaches the maximum level, the school boundary will
be shifted to Highway 6 Bypass. However, as was mentioned in a report
entitled the "Neighborhood Park Study, Hollywood Manor Area" prepared in
1974 by the Planning Division, there is a total of 625 acres of undeveloped
land within the "southeast area" which could be expected to accommodate an
additional approximate 3,200 families and 3,900 children under 18 years of
age. Only a small portion of the total number of children would be of
elementary school age, but, nonetheless, there is cause for concern. The
family size for single family dwellings is as high as 4.8 people per dwelling
unit in the southeast area, but corresponding average family size for
duplexes is a mere 2.67 people per unit, i.e., there are .67 children under
18 years of age per unit. Duplex development, therefore, would be expected
to mollify an apparent future school enrollment problem.
Attached hereto is a memorandum from the Engineering Division summarizing
the conclusions from an analysis of the present loadings and capacity of
the sewers which provide service to the subject tract. Although, as impli-
cated in the previous Staff Report, 0.19 mgd (million gallons per day) of
peak sewage outflow from a 45 -acre area, which includes the subject 31.5
acre tract and the 60 lots within the Mount Prospect Additions, Parts IA
and 2, was allocated because of the existing R1A Zoning, there is in actuality
a reserve capacity within the sewers for an additional 0.08 mgd of sewage
flow, Since the subject tract is the last area to develop within the
sanitary sewer service area, consumption of the reserve capacity does not
present a problem, resulting in the most efficient cost/benefit relationship.
Okay, but what if some unforeseen problem develops for which the reserve
capacity is needed? As in all design standards, there are "built-in"
tolerances to the figures presented including the following:
1. The 3.93 cpu (capita per unit) or average number of people per single
family dwelling unit figure is representative of the average family
size for 286 single family homes and a population of 1,132 people in
12 new residential areas according to the 1970 Decennial Census Block
Statistics report. As a neighborhood matures, however, the average
family size will decrease to an approximate average of 2.93 people per
dwelling as was derived from 869 people residing in 297 homes in older
areas. Thus, the quantity of sewage flow should proportionately decrease
an anticipated 0.058 mgd for just 31.7 acres of the 45 -acre area,
7 MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICR+LAB
CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES
iiLr(UriLMLU BY JORM MICROLAB
1�
n
-3-
CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES
2. The 350 gpcpd figure for single family development is based upon 100
gpcpd sewage flow timos n 2.5 peak factor plus 100 gpcpd of infiltration
of ground and surface water into the sanitary sewer. The Engineering
Uivision had uniformly applied the sumo rate to duplexes. Yet,
according to Veenstra and Kimm, consulting engineers who had designed
the sewers for this area, design flows for multifamily development
are based upon a 75 gpcpd sewage flow times a 2.5 peak factor plus
12.5 gpcpd of infiltration (the low infiltration rate is predicated
upon the considerably less footage of sewer per capita). Admittedly,
the density of duplex development will be far less than multifamily
development, but is, nevertheless, greater than single family development,
i.e., design flows for duplexes will be less than for single family
dwellings.
In summation, the Engineering Division is "comfortable" with the anticipated
sewage flows expected from the proposed development of the 31.5 acre tract.
Again, however, it is assumed that not more than 44 duplexes nor more than
76 single family homes will be constructed. Said preliminary plat illustrates
41 duplex lots and 74 single family lots.
STAFF Based upon the foregoing analyses,
RECOMMENDATION: it is the Staff's recommendation
that the application be approved
with the understanding that the
tract will not be subdivided into more lots than indicated on the preliminary
plat.
�MICROFILMED OY
{
JORM MICR+LAB
CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES
A
iI
I
I
,I
f
1
i
I
i
i
1
i
1�
n
-3-
CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES
2. The 350 gpcpd figure for single family development is based upon 100
gpcpd sewage flow timos n 2.5 peak factor plus 100 gpcpd of infiltration
of ground and surface water into the sanitary sewer. The Engineering
Uivision had uniformly applied the sumo rate to duplexes. Yet,
according to Veenstra and Kimm, consulting engineers who had designed
the sewers for this area, design flows for multifamily development
are based upon a 75 gpcpd sewage flow times a 2.5 peak factor plus
12.5 gpcpd of infiltration (the low infiltration rate is predicated
upon the considerably less footage of sewer per capita). Admittedly,
the density of duplex development will be far less than multifamily
development, but is, nevertheless, greater than single family development,
i.e., design flows for duplexes will be less than for single family
dwellings.
In summation, the Engineering Division is "comfortable" with the anticipated
sewage flows expected from the proposed development of the 31.5 acre tract.
Again, however, it is assumed that not more than 44 duplexes nor more than
76 single family homes will be constructed. Said preliminary plat illustrates
41 duplex lots and 74 single family lots.
STAFF Based upon the foregoing analyses,
RECOMMENDATION: it is the Staff's recommendation
that the application be approved
with the understanding that the
tract will not be subdivided into more lots than indicated on the preliminary
plat.
�MICROFILMED OY
{
JORM MICR+LAB
CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES
MiLRW iLrILD BY JORM 141CROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES
p VI. p r 6.30'00'
T•. 32.92!'
O L
ti� Z R • 5 90'
CH 65.76'
I 4 -
III
mo, 6:6 19Z
7'05' W
26.01 •,.I.
Io . 6• az'zz'
T el.l2'
7L .162.07'
R . 1420
GH, IG 1.98' T2 Z.
s ee• 99' 2T "w
rr
Pr
ICROFILMED BY
;I DORM MICR+LAB 'I
CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES
i
m I
°lo
u;
V' 6110
N
AI
In
U I 1 I
SI N1
%
4 U. 5
p
0
Ni
NIWin
-'--I 0
585*2744ri1 Y
N-
..7�
I.
♦,
229.51 i 0
N hl
D.CO'
0
3.52'40"1 I p
.
R7
R :2715 1-� _
Z N ee• ZG' 29" W
117
L • 199.75' I bee.ze'
i7
h
0
p1 27 IS' 4'
POINT or DCGINMNC: R.1 yT15'
,
-
0
0
P. 2 TRACT L . ISO. 51..
-
p
4
f
�
R- I A -TO R- 2 a0.1 N
t i
ST "W (
0°�
0 -
13n8 ACRES � Se9'Se'S YC Jo..}w
el
i2o.00
.
`. `0 Eor
"o 'ss"c
IW
01
io
s
. fes•a
e
LWp
s o
�
N91
2 „
N
!y
0N0s•s8'a-r•
570.o0 N
� INI�
yf'.eprE
Lo0,o0'1
; �ITO,00' N
i (WI
A 0.•POINT OP BCGINN IN6
C
W.
CITT •0 R`IB 'TRACT -•j
.
itMrsewvou
r
o
o
d
lae9•se'sT'EZ R— I A TO R- IB
o
_ l
j
yoo.00'
I8.:2 ACRES
1
J I
z
p VI. p r 6.30'00'
T•. 32.92!'
O L
ti� Z R • 5 90'
CH 65.76'
I 4 -
III
mo, 6:6 19Z
7'05' W
26.01 •,.I.
Io . 6• az'zz'
T el.l2'
7L .162.07'
R . 1420
GH, IG 1.98' T2 Z.
s ee• 99' 2T "w
rr
Pr
ICROFILMED BY
;I DORM MICR+LAB 'I
CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES
19i jWU lLi'ILu BY JORM 141CROLAB
• CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES
4 It
0 ISO_ STA, 2 26 F pa,6 4
7+1 j 'W N 3'2o'Z4'E
in IIAr SDI �m 0. n
p T m �� •0 �.
.. .1 OOONN P M u Z
N _ N P.NO•oroe'E'
Ll
120 N
tj Do
D 0 N li I
N A U "toI
;.� N N O. p 1
., u N m F rAD
IJ° �
p I 4 W 0 u p J�: I '( I I
0 ° 0 _
U1° j J
rrwooD ow.
r., 8'E 982.4
3aV 040
Li9 * 1
„
A 0. 267.43'
I
5 i41C46F ILMED BY
1
'I JORM MICR+LAB
i CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES
Ov
i _ ON_J
U.�
_j
'
U'L
��
m,f
j•� SYCAMORE
S'r H.GCT 1_L---_
`,50,00' 75.40'--
';I
-- __
--N40'0103
t
E I
SO'O1'03•E
I—
355.14'
p
246.93'z
403.07'
I N I
_
^1•
N
° N4
0•
OD
N to ,
I
��
o
!
pZ
o
rmD,
m Io
0 W.P
8
�, o
°•
Ni
NW
N
C_
O ,! 8 • W
NO.OI'OD•1M
,
A 0
-4 N
Pc STn r 9o.6B .D
N
150
�'L-•2a
0.
0
4 It
0 ISO_ STA, 2 26 F pa,6 4
7+1 j 'W N 3'2o'Z4'E
in IIAr SDI �m 0. n
p T m �� •0 �.
.. .1 OOONN P M u Z
N _ N P.NO•oroe'E'
Ll
120 N
tj Do
D 0 N li I
N A U "toI
;.� N N O. p 1
., u N m F rAD
IJ° �
p I 4 W 0 u p J�: I '( I I
0 ° 0 _
U1° j J
rrwooD ow.
r., 8'E 982.4
3aV 040
Li9 * 1
„
A 0. 267.43'
I
5 i41C46F ILMED BY
1
'I JORM MICR+LAB
i CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES
ORDINANCE
AN ORDINANCE VACATING CAPITOL STREET BETWEEN COURT
STREET AND HARRISON STREET IN IOWA CITY, IOWA.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF IOWA CITY,
IOWA.
SECTION I. That that portion of Capitol Street in
the County Seat Addition to the City of Iowa City,
Iowa, lying south of the south right-of-way line
of Court Street and north of the north right-of-
way line of Harrison is hereby vacated.
SECTION II. That this ordinance shall be in full
force and effect on March 1, 1979.
Passed and approved this
ROBERT A. VEVERA, MAYOR
ATTEST: ABBIE STOLFUS, CITY CLERK
el
f$ECEIVED .k APPP.01.1
8$ Ta LEGAL DEPAR'. ;:.'11T
�� iri ra•,�9 :_
-;11(kul 1011) Bl
JORM MICROLA13
CRIAP RAPP' • PCS MONCS