Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1989-03-07 Bd Comm. MinutesMINUTES DRAFT FORMAL MEETING PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 16, 1989 - 7:30 P.M. CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS MEMBERS PRESENT: Clark, Cook, Dierks, Hebert, Scott, Wallace MEMBERS ABSENT: Cooper STAFF PRESENT: Beagle, Gentry, Kritz CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Scott called the meeting to order at 8:53 p.m. RECOMMENDATIONS TO COUNCIL: 1. Recommend denial of an amendment to the River Corridor Overlay (ORC) Zone of the Zoning Ordinance clarifying the 30 -foot setback requirement. 2. Recommend approval of Z-8901, a request submitted by Dynevor, Inc., to rezone a 5.841 acre parcel located south of Plaen View Drive and east of Mormon Trek Boulevard from PDH -8 to RS -8. 3. Recommend that Council consent to the vacation of Lots 39-43 and 46-49 of Ty'n Cae Subdivision, Part Three. 4. Recommend approval of S-8902, a request submitted Dynevor, Inc., for preliminary plat approval of a 5.841 acre, 20 -lot residential subdivision known as Ty'n Cae Subdivision, Part Five. 5. Recommend approval of S-8835, a request submitted by Byers & Happel, Inc., for preliminary plat approval to establish a 20.51 acre, 33 -lot residential subdivision known as Cameron Subdivision subject to the Subdivider's Agreement requiring installation of the eight -foot sidewalk on Mormon Trek Boulevard and crosswalk extending south of Elliot Court up front with other paving in the subdivision. 6. Recommend approval of a preliminary PDH and LSRD plan submitted by Byers & Happel of a 6.759 acre, 28 -unit condominium development known as Willowbrooke Pointe Condominiums located at the northeast corner of the Mormon Trek Boulevard and Benton Street intersection subject to submission of a legally binding instrument at the time of final plat application regarding maintenance of the common open space. 7. Recommend approval of the Summary Report for Willowbrooke Point Condominiums. ZONING ITEMS: 1. Public discussion of an amendment to the River Corridor Overlay Zone (ORC) of the Zoning Ordinance clarifying the 30 -foot setback requirement. 343 Planning & Zoning Commission February 16, 1989 Page 2 Cook moved to approve the proposed amendment to the River Corridor Overlay Zone specifying the floodway encroachment line from which the 30 -foot setback requirement is measured. Hebert seconded the motion. Scott stated that after hearing a considerable amount of discussion on this issue and seeing how the setback would be calculated, he could understand how a person not familiar with the amendment could be confused as to the actual position of the floodway line and setback lines. Scott continued and noted that there were only three commercial structures and six or seven single-family homes that would be affected by the proposed amendment. Scott concluded by saying that as so few properties would be affected by the proposed amendment, there seems to be little reason to support the proposed amendment given the number of years the present ordinance has been in effect and its success in controlling development in the floodplain. Dierks stated that she was confused regarding what affect the ordinance, as proposed, would actually have on riverfront properties and would prefer deferring the item until more information was available. The motion was denied, 0-6. Cook moved to recommend denial of the proposed amendment to the River Corridor Overlay Zone. Hebert seconded the motion. The motion carried, 6-0. Cook moved to propose a sense of the Commission to encourage the City Council to (1) initiate immediate designation of a 15 -foot right-of-way for a future trail along all publicly owned lands; (2) incorporate a trail into the design of the new Benton Street bridge; (3) encourage all landowners to donate a 15 -foot easement along the river in an effort to bank the land for future trail development; (4) encourage the City to support matching funds to extend the trail from the art museum to the Iowa Avenue bridge; (5) encourage the City to match funds for a trail from Iowa Avenue bridge to the Burlington Street bridge; (6) recognize the need to use economic development funds for infrastructure like the river corridor which benefits existing as well as new businesses; (7) recognize the value of offering an alternative to pedestrians and cyclists competing with 22,800 cars a day on Riverside Drive. Hebert seconded the motion. Cook stated he would like to see a fully developed riverfront trail. Cook noted that there has not been much progress on this issue since the Stanley report came out and feels that the end result could be as far reaching and as important to the City of Iowa City as the downtown pedestrian mall. Cook concluded by saying that he did not vote for the proposed amendment on the grounds of legal and political reasons. The motion carried, 6-0. PUBLIC DISCUSSION OF ANY ITEM NOT ON THE AGENDA: Melissa Williams, 722 Rundell Street and owner of The Second Act clothing store, addressed the Commission regarding the zones that permitted second-hand clothing stores are permitted to locate in. Williams explained that currently second - 363 Planning & Zoning Commission February 16, Page 3 hand clothing stores are recognized as a retail use and are permitted only in but, has been unable to find those zonesthat new location lfor eher business continued and explained that she is looking appropriate location and noted that her current lease i up r July stated that she wished the Commission to consider allw th9thisoissuengiventthat storWilles si a per fitted use erinhe wother sensenof urgency ercial zes such as the CI-1 zone. ll be put List. Williams concluded by saying that she hoped the her current lease will run out in July and thendingthislistm�n'order that Or' Commission's Pending on the p Commission could move this issue up considered before July 1. staff. Beagle replied Dierks asked if the amendment could be done quickly bynot that he reaed the lly could not respond at this time sith nce he has Franklin who it could matter. Williams explained an t she had t list, that wthereawas arPnklin who indicated she would have to sign that if this issue were p advantage of take about a year and given that her lease is up in July, Clark asked whether a anfuture tOrdinance changewifcitwoccurredould vafteraent he S l taking any suggested that this issue, currently item 6 on the pending list, special exception would be possible in this case. Scott said that would not e possible, but be moved up to item 4. will explained that moving her item up to 4 probably list. Scott replied that even if Williams' item was would not help her given the length of time required to dispose of the preceding four items on the pending that it would not assure her thio proper thatt it dbe the moved up to item 3 on the list, dealt with by July 1. Clark stated that he felt it was schedule. other issues on the pending list had been progression of Ms. Williams' business be impeded y Scott indicated commitments regarding made, such as the child care ordinance amendment, and it was not fair to pus them back. Susan Scott, owner of the Houseworks, stated that she had also talked to Karin Franklin and was told that such an amendment would represent a limited amount of staff time. Scott indicated that Williams' issue could be moved t e t onn the pending list. Dierks suggested that it could be placed ate as' suggencil stion, fore care amen wasnnot suretthattWallhamsat Whitem ile hwould e W,lbeacompleted gree to ibyks' sugg he ill July I. CONSIDERATION OF THE MINUTES FOR FEBRUARY 2 1989: rove the minutes of February 91989. Cook seconded the Dierks moved to app with Wallace , abstaining due to absence. motion. The motion carried, 5-0-11 Inc., to tted by DYievor, 2, Z-8901. Public discussion of a request submi45 die limitation Period: Mormon Trek rezone a 41 acr p rcel l cafe touts-8f P1(en View Drive and east of February 23, 1989.) S-8902, Public discussion of a request submitted Dynevor, Inc., for preliminary plat approval of a 5.841 acre, 20-lot residential subdivision 363 Planning & Zoning Commission February 16, 1989 Page 4 known as Ty'n Cae Subdivision, Part Five. (45 -day limitation period: February 23, 1989.) Beagle reviewed the staff report dated February 2, 1989, concerning both items. Clark moved to recommend approval Z-8901, a request submitted by Dynevor, Inc., to rezone a 5.841 acre parcel from PDH -8 to RS -8. Cook seconded the motion. The motion carried, 6-0. Cook moved to recommend the City Council consent to vacate Lots 39-43 and 46-49 of Ty'n Cae Subdivision, Part Three, including a portion of the unimproved platted right-of-way of Dynevor Circle. Hebert seconded the motion. The motion passed 6-0. Cook moved to recommend approval S-8902, a request submitted by Dynevor, Inc., for preliminary plat approval of a 5.841 acre, 20 -lot residential subdivision known as Ty'n Cae Subdivision, Part Five. Hebert seconded the motion. Dierks asked if a similar 8 -foot sidewalk exists across the Farm Bureau property to the south. Larry Schnittjer, MMS Consultants, replied that the proposed sidewalk will stop at the south boundary of the subdivision. The motion carried, 6-0. 3. S-8835. Public discussion of a request submitted by Byers & Happel, Inc., for preliminary plat approval to establish a 20.51 acre, 33 -lot residential subdivision known as Cameron Subdivision; and, preliminary PDH and LSRD plan approval of a 6.759 acre, 28 -unit condominium development known as Willowbrooke Pointe Condominiums, both located at the northeast corner of the Mormon Trek Boulevard and Benton Street intersection. (45 -day limitation period: February 16, 1989.) Beagle noted that the deficiencies that were identified in the February 2, 1989, staff report have been resolved. Beagle concluded by reviewing the Summary Report dated February 16, 1989, regarding the condominium project. Joe Joynt, 827 Spencer Drive, stated that when he bought his home, the land behind him was zoned RS -5 and that now a portion of it is being changed to PDH -5. Joynt said that he was concerned about the changes that would take place and that he would prefer single-family development throughout the area as that is what it was expected when he bought his residence and that he expected it to remain RS -5. Allen Mustin, 821 Spencer Drive, stated he was in agreement with Joe Joynt concerning the condominium development and was opposed to spot zoning which he feels this development represents. 343 Planning & Zoning Commission February 16, 1989 Page 5 Jim Senhall, 2137 Leonard Circle, stated that he was opposed to the proposed development and would prefer single-family development throughout the entire block. Marjorie Kuperman, 2138 Leonard Circle, stated that she did not agree with the proposed condominium development and doesn't feel that the zoning should change. Kuperman indicated that she disliked the design of the condominiums and in particular the arrangement of the parking and the quantity provided as it doesn't fit the existing neighborhood. Cindy Henderson, 2119 Slager Circle, stated that she was opposed to the development and would prefer single-family homes in the area. Sally Orr, 2141 Slager Circle, stated she was concerned that there was not a market for the condominium units that are priced between $80,000- $100,000. Orr continued and said that if the condominium units do not sell, she is worried that they will be converted into rental units. Orr concluded by saying that she was also assuming that when she moved into the area that the area would remain RS -5. Sally Orr read from written comments by Steve Houser who stated that he was under the assumption that the area would remain single-family and that there is no justification for changing this zoning. S.R. Williams, 2214 MacBride Drive, stated that he has lived in the area a long time and that the area has always been generally single-family, but that now it seems that the land use is changing. Williams noted that he made a sizeable investment in his house and land and that he and the neighbors are opposed to this development. Marjorie Miller, 833 Spencer Drive, stated that she supports what her neighbors have said and would like to see the area developed as single- family. Kay Wandling, 2225 MacBride Drive, stated she was opposed to the rezoning for all the reasons previously stated by her neighbors. Joe Joynt read a letter from Dr. Trigg that stated Dr. Trigg opposed the multi -family development, and wished the area to remain single-family. Larry Schnittjer, MMS Consultants, stated that the zoning currently on the Zoning Ordinance map does not ensure that a particular zone will remain unchanged for perpetuity. Schnittjer also pointed out that there will not be 112 open parking spaces for the condominiums, but rather half of those would be inside garages. Sally Orr stated that she did not know that the zoning maps made no guarantees as to future land use and just wished that the neighborhood remained single-family. Hebert moved to approve the preliminary plat known as Cameron Subdivision subject to the Subdivider's Agreement submitted at the time of final plat 343 Planning & Zoning Commission February 16, 1989 Page 6 application to require the installation of the eight -foot sidewalk along Mormon Trek Boulevard and crosswalk extending south of Elliot Court up front with the other paving in the subdivision. Cook seconded the motion. The motion carried, 6-0. Cook moved to approve the preliminary PDH and LSRD plan for Willowbrooke Pointe Condominiums subject to the submission of a legally binding instrument regarding maintenance of the common open space area at the time of final plat application. Hebert seconded the motion. Dierks stated that she was in agreement with the neighbors that this rezoning was not what they had expected when they moved into the area and that she sympathized with them. Cook stated that the higher density development on the south end of the tract enabled the development at the northern side of the tract to develop at a lower density. Cook concluded by saying that the condominiums do fill a market demand in Iowa City and will vote in favor. Hebert stated that there will be more green space provided than what would exist if the whole area was developed as single-family. Hebert concluded by saying he has seen similar condominium units constructed in Cedar Rapids and that they are first rate and will vote for the subdivision. Dierks asked about the construction timetable for the condominiums. Bill Happel stated that there has been no decision made on that matter, but that not all seven would be built at once. Happel continued and stated that two builders are currently going to construct the single-family homes and both will have an option to build the condominiums. Scott stated that the minimum lot size in an RS -5 zone is 8,000 square feet and that the lot size for the proposed single family lots is significantly larger. Scott continued and noted that this is a result of the trade-off made possible by the PDH -5 zoning. Scott indicated that PDH -5 is not a spot zoning and that the PDN -5 density is within the density limitations of the RS -5 zone. Scott continued and indicated that the Comprehensive Plan designates land uses such as commercial, residential and density while the zoning map lists particular zoning classifications. Scott concluded by noting that at a previous meeting, the Planning and Zoning Commission indicated that this area would remain residential and not commercial and that the current proposal meets those guidelines and will vote in favor of the proposal. The motion carried, 5-1, Dierks voting nay. Cook moved to approve the summary report. Hebert seconded the motion. The motion carried, 6-0. Scott thanked the public in attendance for their comments at tonight's meeting. OTHER BUSINESS: Scott thanked Mary Ann Wallace and Dave Clark for their attendance though they were sick. 363 Planning & Zoning Commission February 16, 1989 Page 7 Clark moved to adjourn the meeting. Wallace seconded the motion. The motion carried 6-0. The meeting was adjourned at 10:15 p.m. Minutes submitted by Kyle L. Kritz. Minutes approved by: Kenneth Cooper, Secretary 3 C3 MINUTES DRAFT JOINT MEETING PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION RIVERFRONT COMMISSION FEBRUARY 16, 1989 - 7:30 P.M. CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS MEMBERS PRESENT: Bruner, Clark, Cook, Dierks, Hebert, Hesse, Jones, Scott, Wachal, Wallace MEMBERS ABSENT: Cooper STAFF PRESENT: Beagle, Gentry, Rockwell, Kritz CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Wachal called the joint meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission and the Riverfront Commission to order at 7:34 p.m. b. Discussion of an amendment to the river corridor overlay (ORC) zone of the Zoning Ordinance clarifying the 30 -foot setback boundary requirement. Riverfront Commissioner Doug Jones reviewed the major issues connected with the proposed amendment to the River Corridor Overlay Zone. Jones reviewed the jurisdictional control of land along the Iowa River stating that the State of Iowa controls the land covered by the river up to the normal high water mark, while the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers have responsibility to protect the wetland areas as stipulated in the Clean Water Act and the remainder of the riverfront property is in control of private or public owners. Jones briefly explained the Federal Floodplain Insurance Program and the regulations controlling development on floodplains. Jones emphasized that development is prohibited within the floodway. Jones discussed the current setback requirements that stipulate that development cannot take place closer than 30 feet from either 1) the "riverbank" -- the water level line at 6000 cubic feet per second outflow from the Coralville Dam, or 2) the floodway encroachment line. Jones indicated that a 30 -foot setback from the "riverbank" should never prevent development to occur within the floodway. Jones added that in areas where fill is required to bring residential development one foot above the 100 - year flood level, the fill is required at that level for a distance of 17 feet from the edge of the structure to the floodway encroachment line, thus if the 30 -foot setback was required as proposed to be measured from the floodway encroachment line, the proposed amendment would involve only an additional 13 feet of setback. Jones stated that this situation is not accurately reflected in the estimates of land area affected by the proposed ordinance change. Jones reviewed other existing setbacks required in Iowa City, including front, side and rear yard setbacks and right-of-way setbacks. Jones continued and explained how land along the river represents a primary public recreational area and that this parkway -like area is threatened by 344- Planning & Zoning Commission Riverfront Commission February 16, 1989 Page 2 development. The Riverfront Commission finds the current setback requirement unacceptable because of the option of choosing either the riverbank or the floodway encroachment line as the base line from which to measure the 30 -foot setback. Jones concluded'by stating that the Riverfront Commission recommends that the discretionary wording be removed from the River Corridor Overlay Zone setback requirement. The Commission agrees that a "grandfather" clause should be included that prevents existing structures which are currently conforming from being considered non -conforming if the proposed amendment is adopted. Dierks asked if the state owned the property covered by the River Corridor Overlay Zone. Jones replied that the state owned the land that would be covered by a 6,000 cubic feet per second outflow from the Coralville Dam. Scott asked if the proposed ordinance amendment allowed any existing structure that presently is conforming to remain so if the amendment were to be approved. Beagle replied yes, it would. Wallace asked if already platted subdivisions would be included in the grandfathered clause. Scott replied no, they would not. The public hearing on a proposed amendment to the river corridor overlay zone was opened at 7:53 p.m. Howard Sokol, 801 Normandy Drive, asked if it was possible to locate the floodway line and accurately position the line on a person's property. Scott replied that yes, it could be done through surveying. Beagle noted that the National Flood Insurance Study contains a map that shows where the floodway line is located and that a survey could be done to accurately locate it on a particular parcel. Sokol asked if the floodway line would have to move as the course of the river changed. Beagle replied that as development occurred in the watershed, the Corps of Engineers would have to re-evaluate the original figures and adjust the floodway line accordingly. Lyle Seydel, 445 Garden Street, stated that he was concerned about properties located in the 100 block of Taft Speedway. Seydel indicated apprehension about being able to locate the floodway encroachment line on the actual property and not just on the map. Seydel noted he preferred the current definition of 6,000 cubic feet per second as defining the riverbank. He thought the "riverbank" base line would affect less private land. Seydel asked what would happen if homes were destroyed that were located in the setback area. Scott replied that the home could be restored to its original condition. Seydel asked whether the structure could be expanded. Scott replied yes, as long as the degree of non -conformity is not increased. Jones pointed out that the structure Mr. Seydel alluded to currently could not expand if it were situated within the floodway. Seydel asked if a structure was remodeled or refurbished, that in fact may be on the current floodway line, would that still be permitted as long as the foundation wasn't expanded. Scott replied yes, if the structure does not encroach into the floodway. 344A Planning & Zoning Commission Riverfront Commission February 16, 1989 Page 3 James White, Box 314, Bennett, Iowa, stated that he was told over the phone by City staff that this ordinance did not affect single-family homes. Scott replied that this is true if the home is currently conforming except for Mr. Seydel's example of extending the foundation line. White asked how porches would be handled if the house was destroyed. Gentry responded that the grandfather clause does not allow further encroachment on the setback in order to allow the passage of floodwaters. In the case Mr. White cited, if the structure did not already violate the floodway line, he would be permitted to rebuild. White pointed out that a home could be larger than the foundation that it is situated on. Gentry pointed out that the linear parameters of a home's base line is what is important in this case. Scott replied that the Zoning Code Interpretation Panel would be the appropriate body to answer Mr. White's procedural question and encouraged him to bring it to their attention. White concluded by stating his concern over the preservation of historical homes along the Iowa River and that this ordinance amendment should not endanger their continued existence. Scott Johnson, 431 First Avenue, stated he was in support of the Ordinance amendment because it provided directions for development along the Iowa River. Johnson indicated that there is a misconception that the Coralville dam prevents catastrophic flooding in Iowa City and recounted two instances where the emergency spillway was nearly overtopped in the past fifteen years. Johnson pointed out that the Corps of Engineers estimates that 40% of the original storage capacity of the Coralville Reservoir has been reduced by siltation and an additional 1.5-3% of the remaining storage capacity is lost each year. Johnson also indicated that dredging the reservoir would cost billions of dollars to undertake. Johnson commented that land use patterns are very long lasting and that eventually the dam will not exercise control over the Iowa River and that this is why the Ordinance amendment represents a method to address the development problems along the Iowa River. Johnson urged the Commissioners to endorse the Ordinance amendment as a basis for further restrictions on development in the floodway or the floodplain which may include governmental purchase of land in the floodplain in order to develop it as a parkway. Mace Braverman, 503 Melrose Avenue, said he was confused by the purpose of this Ordinance amendment as there already exists adequate laws regarding development in the floodway. Scott replied that this Ordinance amendment does not deal with the floodway. Current regulations do not permit construction in the floodway. The proposed amendment's grandfather clause only deals with those structures within the 30 -foot setback area. Jeffrey Schabilion, 431 Rundell Street, stated there were three areas of public concern associated with the proposed Ordinance amendment to the River Corridor Overlay Zone: (1) flooding and attendant financial losses, (2) ecological, and (3) aesthetics. Schabilion noted that in all three areas the passage of the proposed amendment to the Ordinance would be beneficial as an enhancement of the public good. 34V Planning & Zoning Commission Riverfront Commission February 16, 1989 Page 4 Marshall McKusic, 820 Park Road, stated he encouraged the reasonable and proper use of the Iowa River and that the proposed Ordinance amendment represents a minimum step in that direction. He is in favor of the proposed change. Larry Schnittjer, MMS Consultants, stated he had an exception to statements about the placement of the setback line. Schnittjer indicated that the location of the floodway line was impossible to determine on an actual property as the floodway line as shown on the map is 20 feet wide according to the map scale. Schnittjer noted that the "riverbank" can be determined by the 6,000 cubic feet per second flow and that while he agreed with Scott Johnson about the future flooding potential of the Iowa River, he does not know what the answer is to the problem. Wachal stated that the floodway line must be accurately positioned because under federal law, a person is not permitted to develop in the floodway. Larry Schnittjer replied that the floodway line can, indeed, be determined by elevations on the FEMA map. White asked what affect the proposed amendment would have on Hancher Auditorium and other public and University property along the Iowa River. Scott replied that governmental agencies are not bound by the same laws. Johnson noted that FEMA does set floodway and 100 -year flood limits by elevations with clearly definable benchmarks which surveyors could extrapolate and form a line on that basis. He suggested that the Commission use the FEMA elevation levels as they do not change like the river does as it meanders. Seydel pointed out that front yard setbacks can be waived by taking the average of front yard setbacks along a block and asked whether this could be done with the proposed Ordinance amendment. Gentry responded that the Ordinance is not written to address that question. Seydel stated that it should be. Rockwell noted a phone call from Jim Sanders or Moore Business Forms. in support of the proposed amendment to the River Corridor Overlay Zone Ordinance amendment, and a call from Jim Baculis of Baculis Trailer Court, indicating no opposition to the amendment. Scott noted the receipt of a letter dated February 11, 1989, from Bruce Glasgow in opposition to the proposed amendment as well as a letter from Iowa Car Company also in opposition to the amendment. The joint public meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission and the Riverfront Commission was adjourned at 8:46 p.m. 34V MINUTES IOWA CITY HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION JANUARY 23, 1989 SENIOR CENTER GAME ROOM MEMBERS PRESENT: Rosalie Reed, Haywood Belle, Harold Weilbrenner, Terry Powell, Fred Mims, Ray Haines, Dorothy Paul, Jason Chen MEMBERS ABSENT: Chia-Hsing Lu STAFF PRESENT: Alice Harris, Dale Helling RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE CITY COUNCIL: None. REQUESTS TO THE CITY MANAGER FOR INFORMATION OR STAFF ASSISTANCE: None. DIST OF MATTERS PENDING COMMISSION -COUNCIL DISPOSITION: None. RECOGNITION OF PUBLIC AND NEWS MEDIA: None. SUMMARY OF DISCUSSION AND FORMAL ACTIONS TAKEN: The meeting was called to order by Chairperson Reed. The next Commission meeting is scheduled for Monday, February 27, 1989, at 7:00 p.m. in the Senior Center Classroom. Commissioners' request for the names of conciliation team members assigned for each case designated was Team A - Harold Weilbrenner, Chair; Dorothy Paul, Haywood Belle. Team B - Ray Haines, Chair; Rosalie Reed, Chia-Hsing Lu; Team C - Terry Powell, Chair; Fred Mims, Jason Chen. REPORTS OF COMMISSIONERS: Harold Weilbrenner stated that the HUD training session on January 21, 1989, was cancelled. This session will be conducted by Mr. Elvis Gibson by the Kansas City HUD Office. A new date will be set. CASES PENDING: Weilbrenner raised options on conciliation case. He suggested administrative closure as an alternative to public hearing. This would allow complainant to file with the State for a "Right to Sue" document enabling him to go to District Court. 3GS MINUTES IOWA CITY HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION JANUARY 23, 1989 PAGE 2 Weilbrenner made a motion to close the case. Terry Powell seconded. Motion carried. Alice Harris reported that three cases have been sent to Legal. ELECTION OF OFFICERS FOR 1989: Haywood Belle nominated Harold Weilbrenner for Chairman. Harold Weilbrenner nominated Ray Haines for Chairman. Haines suggested that he remain as Vice -Chairman and that Weilbrenner be the Chairman. Motion was made and carried. OLD BUSINESS: Haines brought up for discussion the presentation material he had prepared. It was met with wide acceptance. Input was asked for and further discussion and comments will be forthcoming at the next meeting. Re -publication of Commission brochure was approved. NEW BUSINESS: Dale Melling brought up the orientation training for new Commissioners. It will be held on March 7, 1:00-3:00 in the Human Relations Conference Room. Haines and Harris will attend the HUD conference in March as part of our mandatory training requirement. The 1989 Human Rights Awards Breakfast is scheduled for October 26, 1989. Facilities at the Holiday Inn have been reserved. COMMISSION GOAL/PRIORITY SETTING DISCUSSION: A subcommittee was formed including Harold Weilbrenner, Fred Mims, Rosalie Reed, Alice Harris, and Dale Melling to establish goals. Dale Helling also recommended that legal consultation be included in regard to some issues and priority setting. Meeting was adjourned. 345 371 I c�nan aaa Asspwnoa rw rwuussnenorrw uy i aesr fumes. rw or werwa. etwsusr rawuwnw I 1' � r , 9fAnict TUN[ nictitate QUIT CLAIM DEED FOR 1� Fa ee OpadMdawd One_________________________________________________ Doem(s)"oawwvaWpW=dudanuon. CITY OF IOWA CITY. IOWA, a municipal corporation. dohmmby"Clanb ROBERT L. WOOOBURN and MARY ANN WOOOBURN, I Allo rmht NW. no mal. syye. dmm anddemand in Te IdlMmg destnbed real asn o ,noon Cotort in: Commencing at the Southeast corner of Lot Eight (B) In Block Forty-e1W (46), in East Ione City, Johnson County, Iowa, according to the recorded plot thereof, thence North 170 fact, thence East 10 feat, thence South 170 feat, thence West 10 feet to the place of beginning. This is on axempt trensectioni this is s deed which, without additional consideration, correct@ a quit claim deed from the City of Iowa City to John J. Reiland and Ella M. Reiland, doted July 31, 1964, and recorded August 7, 1964, In Book 266, Page 471, the City being advised that the conveyance of title from the Reiland* has now proceeded to the Woodburn,. I Each of the undenged hemby rehnwshes as nghn Of dower. homeslead and detnbubve sham n and m the real estate. Worth and0vaeH Intron, indudwg aWOW Wgnenl hmecl. shad bemnsbued w o Tm wguurm pWral murbw,, and of mtoota a or Marano gentler, arcordog b the Coned. Dyed: CITY OF IOWA CITY. IOWA STATE OF (Gramm) COUNTY. By, On Ms_dayol John McDonald, Mayor (Gmnm) -. 19_, bebm me the undersigned, a Nenry Pubic in and kY said Sub, persaWly appeared Attest, Merlon Karr, City Clerk (Groom) 0MWxmmlobethe denbul persons narnednand who (Grantor) e.edrted to kregowg mtnamem and acanpwletlgld Ty they esecMd the same as Teal vok"Ary W aro deed. (Grantor) Notary Pudc ITB k,m d sww47ren b eua.e Owl n earl (Grantor) (Grana) w.wsam^aw,w