Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1988-01-12 Public hearingNOME OF RMC WMING Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the City Council of [ova City, Iowa, at 7:30 p.m. on the 12th day of January, 1988, in the Civic Center Council Charters, lova City, Iowa; at which hearing the Council will consider the follow- ing items: 1. A resolution adopting an addendum to the 1983 Comprehensive Plan Update which addresses devel- opnent proposals out of sequence with the growth management policy espoused in the Carprehensive Plan Update. 2. A resolution amending the 198.3 Canprdnensive Plan Loate to reclassify the lard use designa- tion of a tract krnovn as Southwest Estates vhich is located within the corporate limits of love City, north of R )hret Road and east of Slothower Road from Agricultural/Rural Residential to Residential at a density of 2-8 Belling units per acre. 3. An ordinance to rezone an 84.73 acre tract known as Southwest Estates from ID -RS, Interim Devel- opment - Single -Family Residential, and Pot -1, Rural Residential, to RS -5, Low Density Sin- gle -Family Residential. 4. An ordinance anending Section 36-8 of the Zoning Ordinance regarding the storage of spe- cial vehicles. 5. An ordinance to rezone an approximate 1.8 acre tract located east of Boyrun Street and north of Olympic Circle fron I-1, General Industrial, to CI -1, Intensive Commercial. Copies of the proposed amendments are on file for public examination at the Office of the City Clerk, Civic Center, lova City, lows. Persons wishing to make their views known for Council consideration are encouraged toappear at the above-mentioned time and place. MARIAN K. KAddt, CITY CLERK M 33 u M RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION INCLUDELAN ATE AN OUT L OF SEQUECE DEVELOPMENT POLICY TO WHEREAS, the City's 1983 Comprehensive Plan Update is a statement of the land use goals and policies of the comnunity; and WHEREAS, the Comprehensive Plan growth management policy provides, with respect to timing or sequence of development, that development should occur only at such time as it is possible to maintain compact and contiguous growth and to maximize efficiency of municipal services; and WHEREAS, the City Council directed the Planning and Zoning Commission to consider a policy that would allow development out of phase with growth management policies recommended in the 1983 Comprehensive Plan Update; and WHEREAS, the Commission developed the Out of Sequence Development policy set forth in paragraph 1, below; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council have held public meetings to receive citizen comments on the Out of Sequence Develop- ment Policy and it has been recommended by the Planning and Zoning Comnis- sion; and WHEREAS, the Commission and Council find that while the Out of Sequence Development Policy allows for development out of phase with the City's growth management policy it approximates the efficiency of development upon which this growth management policy is based; and WHEREAS, these bodies have found that the Out of Sequence Development Policy reflects the desires of the community and should be added to the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF IOWA CITY, IOWA, THAT: 1. The following Out of Sequence Development Policy be adopted as an adden- dum to the 1983 Comprehensive Plan Update. From time to time, certain factors may encourage private developers to develop tracts of land out of phase with the development sequence determined to be appropriate for the City. Those developments will require the extension of municipal services in a manner that is inefficient and not anticipated in the City's capital improvements program. In order to approximate the efficiency of development upon which the City's growth management policy is based, out of sequence development would be required to expend all of the casts associated with that development,including costs typically subsidized by the customarily paid by t City. Costs he City may be recouped at such time as sufficient intervening development occurs to resemble the cost/benefit balance on which sequent development is based. 33 Resolution No. Page 2 2. This policy shall be considered in the context of the broad goals and objectives of the 1978 Comprehensive Plan and the 1983 Comprehensive Plan Update. It was moved by and seconded by Resolution be adopted, and upon roll call there were: AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: AMBRISCO COURTNEY DICKSON HOROWITZ LARSON MCDONALO STRAIT Passed and approved this day of 1988. ATTEST: CITY CLERK MAYOR the Recelved A Approved By The level Depaftmey 33 Jl. M City of Iowa City MEMORANDUM Date: December 3, 1981 To: Planning and Zoning Commission From: Monica Moen, Associate Planner IY,i'"'"/ Re: Out of Sequence Development: Comprehensive Plan Amendment Pressure has recently been applied to permit development within Iowa City out of sequence with the City's growth management policy espoused in the 1983 Comprehensive Plan Update. The Commission has evaluated this request in terms of the fiscal consequences of permitting development out of phase with that policy. The Commission recognizes that the sequence of develop- ment which has been determined to be appropriate for the City is based on the premise that areas which can accommodate the greatest population for the least costs in capital improvements are highly developable. If we assume the City's growth management policy continues to be valid and, if the City wishes to allow development out of phase with that pol- icy, out of sequence development must, therefore, achieve the same cost/benefit balance on which the City's development sequence is based. The following language is suggested as a means of addressing out of se- quence development within the Comprehensive Plan. This statement could be included as an addendum to Section IV of the 1983 Comprehensive Plan Update which discusses development sequence (pp. 28-29 of 1983 Update). Out of Sequence Development From time to time, certain factors may encourage private developers to develop tracts of land out of phase with the development sequence deter- mined to be appropriate for the City. Those developments will require the extension of municipal services in a manner that is inefficient and not anticipated in the City's capital improvements program. In order to approximate the efficiency of development upon which the City's growth management policy is based, out of sequence development would be required to expend all of the costs associated with that development, including costs typically subsidized by the City. Costs customarily paid by the City may be recouped at such time as sufficient intervening development occurs to resemble the cost/benefit balance on which sequent development is based. MM/sp Approved by: tinent of Planning gram Development 33 M City of lows City MEMORANDUM Date: November 5, 1987 To: Planning and Zoning Commission �/ From: Monica Moen, Associate Planner'1Vv Re: Southwest Estates - Out of Sequence Development Costs In a memorandum to the Commission, dated October 1, 1987, a summary of the costs of the major anticipated improvements which will be necessary with development of the southwest area east and west of U.S. 218 was presented. That sumnary is included as Addendum A to this memorandum. The purpose of this memorandum is to determine the direct benefit to Southwest Estates of providing these capital improvements out of sequence with the development policy adopted by the City and hence, not anticipated within the City's current Capital Improvements Program (CIP). The equitable cost to be paid by Southwest Estates for developing ahead of the City's capital improvements schedule can then be derived. The growth management policy adopted for Iowa City encourages development in those areas which can accommodate the greatest population for the least public cost. Development at the City's fringe is inconsistent with this policy in that the cost of providing the infrastructure and services required within an outlying subdivision must be subsidized by existing commercial and residential uses until undeveloped properties separating existing and pro- posed development are developed. To achieve the cost/benefit balance on which the City's growth management policy is based within fringe developments, it would be appropriate for the developer of Southwest Estates to pay the cost of those improvements required as a result of proposed subdivisions out of sequence with the adopted devel- opment policy and, therefore, not anticipated within the current CIP. These expenditures would be reimbursed by the City at such time as intervening development occurs that is capable of supporting the cost of those improve- ments. This arrangement would relieve existing development of the inequity of subsidizing the opportunity for growth on the edge of the community. With development of Southwest Estates, certain costs must be incurred immedi- ately; roads, for example, must be provided within the subdivision and fire, police and sanitation services must be extended to the residents of the area. Other expenditures such as improvements to Rohret Road may not be required immediately but can be anticipated in the short-range as more and more resi- dents living west of U.S. 218 rely upon that roadway to access the center of the City. Upgrading the southwest interceptor sewer will benefit the entire southwestern part of Iowa City, a substantial portion of which is undeveloped and not expected to develop in the short-range timeframe of the Comprehensive Plan. Improvements to this system are, therefore, long-range in scope. As will be shown, it is the immediate costs associated with improvements required within a subdivision that the developer of Southwest Estates can anticipate financing. Although some of these improvements will benefit an area beyond Southwest Estates, these improvements are essential to the devel- 33 opment of proposed Southwest Estates subdivisions. It is, however, because the benefits of some of these improvements will be realized by residents outside of the Southwest Estates subdivisions that makes it appropriate to reimburse the developer the cost of those improvements customarily subsidized by the City. IMMEDIATE COSTS Infrastructure within a development that the City customarily becomes respon- sible for maintaining includes roads, the water supply system and the sewage disposal system. Services a subdivision looks to the City to provide include police and fire protection and solid waste disposal. All of these services must be available with development of the first lot within the subdivision. Street Improvements: The proposed development of Southwest Estates will require provisions for secondary access for the convenience and safety of the residents of the development. The means of secondary access that would offer the greatest assurance to Southwest Estates residents in the event blockages occur on Rohret Road east of the Phoenix Drive/Rohret Road intersection would be via Slothower Road north of its intersection with Phoenix Drive extended. It is anticipated that, with development of the southwest area, an arterial link between Melrose Avenue and Rohret Road would be needed to assist in circulating traffic generated by the potential development. Slothower Road is expected to function in this capacity as development west of U.S. 218 warrants a route, in addition to Rohret Road and Melrose Avenue, to carry traffic to and from this area. While the appropriate alignment of this arterial street has not been deter- mined, it is anticipated that either Slothower Road from Rohret Road to Melrose Avenue will serve this purpose or that Phoenix Drive and Slothower Road north of its intersection with Phoenix Drive will be designed and con- structed to secondary arterial street standards. In anticipation of this alternative, 60 feet of right-of-way for Phoenix Drive has been dedicated in Southwest Estates, Parts 1 and 2, and the paving, at the developer's expense, has been increased from standard local street width of 28 feet to 31 feet. Concept plans for the future development of Southwest Estates show an exten- sion of Phoenix Drive to its intersection with Slothower Road at a right-of- way width of 60 feet. While proposed development within Southwest Estates will rely upon Phoenix Drive, the need for overwidth pavement on this street is precipitated by the need for a collector street through this tract to facilitate the circulation of traffic generated by residents of the southwest area west of U.S. 218. In conformance with the cost/benefit policy referred to above, the cost of overwidth paving, estimated to be $16,000, would be initially financed by the developer but reimbursed by the City as future development of the southwest area occurs. Secondary access to Southwest Estates, as noted, should be provided by means of Slothower Road from its intersection with Phoenix Drive to Melrose Avenue. The immediate need for a means of secondary access is to assure that emer- gency vehicles can access the development and to offer an alternate route of getting to and from Southwest Estates subdivisions in the event Rohret Road is impassable east of its intersection with Phoenix Drive. T 33 Without upgrading Slothower Road, this roadway could not accommodate, on a daily basis, the amount of traffic anticipated with development of Southwest Estates. In the interim during which secondary access is needed to assure the safety of Southwest Estates residents, until improvements to Slothower Road are justified to facilitate traffic circulation in the area, breakaway bollards should be placed on Phoenix Drive at the point of intersection with Slothower Road to enable emergency access but to prevent routine traffic circulation. These bollards are for the direct benefit of Southwest Estates residents in that they allow access in emergency situations and are, there- fore, nonreimbursable expenses associated with subdivision of that tract. The cost of breakaway bollards at the Phoenix Drive/Slothower Road intersection is estimated to be $5,000. Water Service: Oversized water mains are required within Southwest Estates to provide water service within the development and to permit the extension of municipal water service to undeveloped properties abutting this develop- ment. Oversized water mains, like overwidth pavement, are usually subsidized by the City because the usefulness of these improvements advances beyond the immediate needs of the residents of the proposed subdivision. Until inter- vening development occurs, however, only a limited number of people reap the benefit of these oversized improvements at the expense of existing develop- ment that does not directly benefit by these services. Consistent with the City's development policy to encourage development in areas which can accom- modate the greatest population for the least cost in capital improvements, the developer of Southwest Estates should advance the cost of oversized water mains within the development, to be paid back as intervening development occurs that benefits by the presence of oversized water mains in the area. The cost of oversized main within Southwest Estates is estimated at $36,800. Sewer Service: Two issues arise when contemplating the immediate sewer service needs of Southwest Estates and the impact of development of this tract on the capacity of the sewer system serving the southwest area. First, the appropriate method of sewage disposal must be identified and secondly the developer's responsibility for compensating for the use of sewer capacity reserved for development east of U.S. 218 must be analyzed. While a portion of the 85 acre tract under consideration can be served via gravity by the municipal sewer system, it was established in the October 1, 1987 memorandum to the Commission that the entire RR -1 zoned portion of the parcel should be served by a lift station. Because the maintenance require- ments of lift stations are not cost effective to a City if such a system serves only a few properties, it was further recommended that a lift station be installed that is capable of serving the entire area within the corporate limits which is zone RR -1 and the remainder of the developer's tract which is located outside the corporate limits but which drains toward the subject tract. The lift station should be of sufficient capacity to permit develop- ment of this property for single-family residential uses at urban densities. While the developer would be responsible for the entire immediate cost of installation of this system (approximately $150,000), the developer could negotiate the cost of the system with the property owners west of Slothower Road who would benefit by the presence of a lift station of sufficient capac- ity to meet their needs. The option of establishing a sewer district to finance installation and maintenance of this system could also be explored. KK Development of the southwestern portion of the City is constrained by limita- tions within the trunk sewer system serving that area of the City. A bottle- neck situation effectively limits the sewage capacity of the system such that the entire 438 acres of undeveloped land which would rely on this segment of the system could only develop at a rate of two people per acre or approxi- mately one dwelling unit per acre. Due to this limitation, the Comprehensive Plan recommends that residential development be confined to areas east of 218. At an average zone), the first100wacresgofnlandit edevelnsity of 5dwelling units oped westof U.S 218 would in re (RS-5in effect restrict development of unplatted/undeveloped property located east of the highway. Therefore, for development of land out of sequence with the development policy of the Comprehensive Plan or for development of this land at a density greater than that recommended in the Plan, funds should be escrowed for the first 100 acres of unplatted land west of U.S. 218 which is subdivided for residential use at urban densities. These funds would allow installation of the improvements needed to relieve the constraint that re- stricts development. At an estimated cost of $64,000 to upgrade the 10 inch line which limits the capacity of the sewer system, the prorata cost for each of the first 100 acres platted west of U.S. 218 would be about $640. Because improvements to this trunk sewer system would benefit many residents of the southwest area, funds advanced by developers for these improvements would be repaid as development in the southwest area progressed. Police, Fire, Emergency and Sanitation Services: Although it's recognized that the average cost of providing these services to outlying developments will increase to support the additional mileage costs, it is difficult to assess the increment of cost particularly since services are already being provided to the limited number of residents currently living within the Southwest Estates development. As development progresses, however, the average cost will decrease. In the interim, providing these services to this area will be subsidized by existing development. SHORT-RANGE COSTS (10 YEARS OR LESS) Rohret Road: The portion of the southwest area west of U.S. 218 was not expected to fully develop in the 15 year timeframe of the short-range element of the Comprehensive Plan. Although the City's capital improvements program provides for improvements to Rohret Road from its intersection with Mormon Trek Boulevard westerly to the U.S. 218 bridge, the CIP did not anticipate either development of the southwest area at the density requested by the subject proposal or the development of other unplatted/undeveloped land that may be spurred by development of Southwest Estates. Consequently, further roadway ro emeve year ts needtimeframeed toccommodatecthis development were not sched- uled within While immediate improvements to Rohret Road are not expected to be necessary, as development of the southwest area west of U.S. 218 progresses, Rohret Road will have to be upgraded to accommodate traffic generated by that develop- ment. The bulk of the cost of Rohret Road improvements would be financed by Special Assessment. Additional costs such as those associated with overwidth pavement would be borne by way of General Obligation Bonds which are retired by taxes generated on all property within the community. However, because a i would d at the time be 9 development these improvements are mplementdteburdenplaedonexis " 35 which is not directly affected by these improvements will be relieved by the taxes generated by development that will more directly benefit by Rohret Road improvements. Rohret Road/Mormon Trek Intersection Improvements: Traffic generated by development of the western portion of the southwest area is expected, at some point, to require the signalization and widening of the intersection of Mormon Trek Boulevard and Rohret Road to accommodate turning movements to facilitate the circulation of traffic on these roadways. These improvements are expected to benefit not only residents of currently undeveloped land west of Mormon Trek Boulevard but to remedy congestion anticipated on Mormon Trek Boulevard as a result of increased traffic turning from Mormon Trek and accessing development to the west. The $170,000 anticipated cost of these improvements will be borne City-wide. LONG-RANGE COSTS (MORE THAN 10 YEARS) Certain improvements are expected to be long-range in scope. The need for these improvements are not anticipated until some paint between half and full development of the area west of U.S. 218. Rohret Road Bridge Sidewalk: Pedestrian circulation in the southwest area will be impeded by lack of a walkway along the Rohret Road bridge which spans U.S. 218. To assure pedestrian safety, a sidewalk will need to be installed adjacent to the bridge to link residents with schools, parks and other serv- ices located east of the highway. This facility would most likely be funded through General Obligation Bonds. Water Service Improvements: To assure adequate amounts of water pressure and volume to residents living within the western portion of the southwest area, improvements to the municipal water supply system serving this area will be required. While these improvements are not expected to be needed with ini- tial development of the area even at the City's margins, with increased development, the need for looping the system to assure residents of a con- stant water source or to construct a water reservoir in the area will also increase. These costs are long-range in scope, however, and are typically financed by the City. Sewer Service Improvements: Restrictions within the interceptor sewer serv- ing the southwest area limit the extent to which sewer service can be pro- vided in this area. Improvements to this system would increase the development potential of unplatted land located within the major service area of this sewer. Because of the extent of benefit precipitated by these im- provements, the City as a whole will be expected to bear the costs of upgrad- ing this system. SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES Development out of sequence with the growth management policy of the City should be expected to pay for the cost of all improvements required by that development. Otherwise, the opportunity for growth on the edge of the commu- nity inconsistent with that growth management policy would have to be borne by existing development at a rate not anticipated in the Comprehensive Plan. VVI V O 2 For the opportunity for immediate development of Southwest Estates, the developer can be expected to advance the costs of the following improvements. Other than the cost of the breakaway bollards required on Phoenix Drive and the cost of installation of the lift station, the developer would be reim- bursed these costs as future development west of U.S. 218 occurs. TMPRNVFMFNT Overwidth paving - Phoenix Drive Breakaway bollards - Phoenix Drive Oversized water mains Lift station Sewer service improvements TOTAL PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE $ 16,000 5,000 36,800 150,000* 64,000** $211,800 (43% reimbursable) *A portion of this cost may be recovered by the developer of Southwest Es- tates if property owners west of Slothower Road utilize this system. **Assumes the first 100 acres of unplatted land developed west of U.S. 218 is controlled by the developer of Southwest Estates. /sp 33 M M ADDENDUM A SOUTHWEST ESTATES Z-8703 SUMMARY OF ANTICIPATED IMPROVEMENTS Presented below is a summary of the major anticipated improvements which will be necessary with the development of the southwest area east and west of U.S. 218. Although not all of these improvements will be required immediately for Southwest Estates to develop, the improvements will be necessary sooner than the City has planned for them in the allocation of resourcesof r capital improvements. With development of the extremity of the area, there will be a time when these improvements will be required and the cost, if met in the usual manner, will be borne by existing development subsidizing the opportu- nity for growth on the edge of the community. In the table, Alternate A represents the total costs based on Slothower Road being the accepted alignment for a north/south corridor between Melrose Avenue and Rohret Road. Alternate B is based on Phoenix Drive being part of the north/south corridor. 33 ALTERNATE A ALTERNATE 8 SEWER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS Upgrade 10 -inch line between Mormon Trek Boulevard and West High School $ 64,000 $ 64,000 Upgrade various sections of the Southwest Interceptor Sewer 160,000 160,000 WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS Looped water main 64,800 64,800 STREET IMPROVEMENTS Slothower Road Improvements 783,000 296,000 Signalization of the Mormon Trek Boulevard/Rohret Road intersection 20,000 20,000 Widening of Mormon Trek Boulevard/ Rohret Road intersection 150,000 150,000 Rohret Road Improvements 917,000 558,000 Rohret Road Bridge Sidewalk 190,000 190,000 TOTAL $2,348,000 $1,502,800 33 City of Iowa City MEMORANDUM Date: December 3, 1987 To: Planning & Zoning Commission From: Monica Moen, Associate PlannerW� Re: Out of Sequence Development Costs - Reimbursement Mechanism The reimbursement mechanism recommended for out of sequence development assumes the continued validity of two public policies: (1) the growth management policy identified in the 1983 Comprehensive Plan Update which establishes a short-range development sequence (1983-1998) for residential growth in Iowa City and a long-range development sequence (beyond 1998), and (2) the policy that the City pays the cost of overwidth and/or oversized infrastructure within a development. Within the framework of these existing policies, then, development of a tract out of phase with the City's adopted development policy would require the developer to subsidize the cost of development beyond the costs typically financed by a developer in order to approximate the equitable and efficient provision of the infrastructure and service network on which the City's development policy hinges. With regard to Southwest Estates, in particular, if the developer chooses to develop out of sequence with the City's development policy, the cost associated with overwidth and oversized infrastructure needed within the development would be reimbursed as intervening development between Hunter's Run and Southwest Estates is complete, but not before 1998. Property taxes generated by this intervening development would be utilized to reimburse the developer for improvements within Southwest Estates that are not required exclusively as a—r- ult f the subdivi ion of that particular tract. Approved by: C6 e% i 0 nald Schmeiser, Director Department of Planning and Program Development bj/pc \t City of lows City MEMORANDUM Date: November 19, 1987 To: Planning and Zoning Commission From: Monica Moen, Associate Planner Re: Southwest Estates The purpose of this memorandum is to respond to questions raised by Com- mission members at the Commission's informal meeting on Monday, November 2, 1987, regarding (a) development costs for existing and proposed subdi- visions of Southwest Estates beyond those costs normally associated with development of a tract of land, (b) the estimated assessment to property owners for improvements to Rohret Road, and (c) the impact of extension of sewer services to Southwest Estates on residents living outside of this development. Out of Sequence Development Costs With approval of the plat for Southwest Estates, Part 2, the developer agreed to pay the entire cost of overwidth paving on Phoenix Drive, the extension of oversized watermains from Hunter's Run Subdivision to South- west Estates, and placement of oversized watermains within the develop- ment. The total cost of these improvements is estimated as follows: Overwidth paving - Phoenix Drive (1,550 ft.) $ 8,401.00 Oversized watermain extended from Hunter's Run $30,937.50 Subdivision to Southwest Estates Oversized watermain within Southwest Estates $20,125.00 (1,750 ft.) TOTAL $59,463.50 As noted in a memorandum to the Commission dated November 5, 1987, $42,352.50 or 71 percent of these costs have been expended to date. Another memorandum to the Commission, also dated November 5, 1987, identi- fied $271,800 in improvements which are expected to be needed with the proposed subdivision of 84.73 additional acres within Southwest Estates and which are in addition to the subdivision improvements customarily financed by the developer of a tract. Forty-three (43) percent of the cost of these improvements ($116,800) were determined to -be reimbursable to the Southwest Estates developer with subsequent development of land west of U.S. 218. Taking into consideration the financial commitment associated with devel- opment of Southwest Estates, Part 2, ($59,463.50) and development costs of future subdivision of this tract ($271,800), the total out of sequence 33 development cost for existing and proposed Southwest Estates Subdivision is $331,263.50; $116,800 of these costs, or about 35 percent, would be recoupable as future development west of U.S. 218 occurs. Rohret Road Improvements - Estimated Assessment Roadway improvements within the City are typically financed by assessing the cost of those improvements to property owners with land adjacent to the road right-of-way and to a depth of 300 feet from the right-of-way. While the width of pavement for a local street is generally 28 feet, Rohret Road is expected, at some time, to be paved to a 31 foot, collector road width to accommodate traffic anticipated within the area. Adjacent property owners would be assessed the cost of paving the street to local street standards (about $60/lineal foot of lot frontage in today's dol- lars); the balance of the costs would be financed by the City as a whole. The individual assessments may be amortized over a ten year period. In a resolution dated April 8, 1986, the City Council established the policy that no public improvements would be made to either Rohret Road west of U.S. 218 or Slothower Road before 1998. A copy of that resolution is attached. Sewer Service Extension Commission members expressed concern regarding the impact of extension of municipal sewer service to Southwest Estates on established residential uses in the area. More particularly, the Commission queried whether extension of the sewer to Southwest Estates would place existing develop- ment south of Rohret Road within 300 feet of the proposed system and obligate those property owners to connect to the system. Section 33-17 of the Municipal Code states that "[t]he owners of abutting property shall connect their premises to the city public sewer system when the public sewer system is within three hundred (300) feet of such abut- ting property." Although the sewer system proposed for Southwest Estates may be within 300 feet of property south of Rohret Road, these properties are separated from the sewer system by Rohret Road and do not abut the land served by the system. Connection to the system, therefore, would not be required. Please do not hesitate to call me if you have any questions or need addi- tional information. MM/sp kK NOTICE OF PUEUC HFMI6 Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the City Council of Tae City, [ova, at 7:30 p.m. on the 12th day of January, 1988, in the Civic Center Council Chanters, 1%e City, love; at winich hearing the Council will consider the follow- ing iters: 1. A resolution adopting an addendum to the 19E3 Carprehonsive Plan Update which addresses devel- opment proposals out of sequence with the growth management policy espoused in the Comprehensive Plan Update. D2. A resolution amending the 1913 Conp•ehensive Plan Update to reclassify the lard use designa- tion of a tract known as Southwest Estates which is located within the corporate limits of [ova City, north of Rnhret Road and east of Slothower Road from Agricultural/Rural Residential to Residential at a density of 2-8 dwelling units Per acre. 3. Pn ordinance to rezone an 84.73 acre tract known as Southwest Estates from ID -RS, Interim Devel- opment - Single -Family Residential, and fdt-1, Rural Residential, to RS -5, Low Density Sin- gle -Family Residential. 4. An ordinance amending Section 36-58 of the Zoning Ordinance regarding the storage of spe- cial vehicles. 5. Pn ordinance to rezone an approximate 1.8 acre tract located east of Boyruo Street and north of Olympic Circle from I-1, roneral Industrial, to CI -1, Intensive Commercial. Copies of the proposed a ondrots are on file for public examination at the Office of the City Clerk, Civic Center, Iowa City, Iae. Persons wishing to make their views known for Council consideration are encouraged toappear at the above-mentioned time and place. WRIAN K. KAPo2, CITY CLERK 3few RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN BY CHANGING THE LAPID USE CLASSIFICATION OF A TRACT KNOWN AS SOUTHWEST ESTATES FROM AGRICULTURAL/RURAL RESIDENTIAL TO RESIDENTIAL AT A DENSITY OF 2-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE. WHEREAS, the City's Comprehensive Plan is a statement of goals and poli- cies for the community; and WHEREAS, in order to be an effective guide for a vital community, the Plan is flexible and amendable within the context of set goals and objectives described within the Plan; and WHEREAS, the Comprehensive Plan allows development out of phase with the growth management policy recommended in the Plan in a manner that approxi- mates the efficiency of development upon which the City's growth manage- ment policy is based; and WHEREAS, Southwest Estates is a tract of land in the City, east of Slothower Road, north of Rohret Road, south of the Johnson County Care Facility and west of the east line of the Southeast Quarter of Section 13, Township 79 North, Range 7 West of the 5th Principal Meridian; and WHEREAS, while the area in which Southwest Estates is located is shown on the Short -Range Comprehensive Plan map as Agricultural/Rural Residential, with residential development at urban standards not expected to occur before 1998, the owner, Seville Corporation, has agreed that development of Southwest Estates shall be in compliance with the Out of Sequence Development Policy of the Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, based upon the preceding findings, the City Council of Iowa City determines that changing the land use classification of the tract known as Southwest Estates from Agricultural/Rural Residential to Residential at a density of 2-8 dwelling units per acre falls within the context of the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF IOWA CITY, IOWA, THAT: 1. The Short -Range Development Plan Map of the Comprehensive Plan be amended by changing the land use shown for Southwest Estates from Agricultural/Rural Residential to Residential at a density of 2-8 u dwelling units per acre. Resolution No. _ Page 2 It was moved by and seconded by _ the Resolution be adopted, and upon roll call there wer AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: Passed and approved this day of ATTEST: CITY L V _ AMBRISCO COURTNEY DICKSON HOROWITZ LARSON MCDONALD STRAIT . 1988. MAYOR Received A Appmved BY E Levi Deper� 3 ft City of Iowa City MEMORANDUM Date: October 1, 1987 To: Planning and Zoning Commission From: Monica Moen, Associate Planner 11V�1u/ Re: Z-8103. Southwest Estates BACKGROUND INFORMATION The Commission will recall that on May 6, 1987, Frank Eicher, owner of a tract of land in southwest Iowa City known as Southwest Estates, submitted an application to rezone approximately 85 acres of the tract from ID -RS, Interim Development Single -Family Residential, and RR -1, Rural Residential, to RS -5, Low Density Single -Family Residential. In a report to the Commission, dated May 21, 1987, staff explained that a portion of the tract is zoned RR -1 since the provision of gravity flow mu- nicipal sewer service to the area is not anticipated due to topographic constraints. Instead, areas zoned RR -1 are expected to develop at a rural density of one dwelling unit per acre and the policy of the City has been that these areas would rely on septic systems or private treatment plants for sewage disposal. The ID -RS zone is a zone in which the immediate development of land is not anticipated in the Comprehensive Plan. The delay in development is due to the infeasibility of extending municipal services, primarily sewer service, to these areas within the short-range timeframe of the Plan. As developments expand to reach these outlying tracts and as municipal services may be effi- ciently extended to service these areas, the properties currently zoned ID -RS are intended to develop for single-family residential uses at urban densities (RS -5, RS -8 or RS -12 zones). In a letter dated January 29, -1987, Mr. Eicher expressed a desire to rezone his property to RS -5 "...so that it may be more cost effective to extend sanitary sewer service to Southwest Estates from the existing sewer line that serves the Johnson County Care Facility." To date, Mr. Eicher has borne the entire cost of extending oversized water mains to serve existing Southwest Estates subdivisions and has also paid for overwidth pavement within the subdivisions. Oversized water mains and overwidth pavement are usually subsidized by the City. If his property is rezoned RS -5, Mr. Eicher intends to extend the municipal sanitary sewer service to Southwest Estates at no expense to the City and is receptive to paying for oversized water mains and overwidth pavement within the proposed development. At its May 21, 1987, meeting, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended denial of this rezoning request based on the fact that the requested rezoning is contrary to the Comprehensive Plan development policy for the area. The Commission suggested that consideration of the development policy for the southwest area be done in conjunction with the upcoming review of the Compre- hensive Plan. Subsequently, after a joint meeting with the Planning and Zoning Commission, the Council directed the Commission to proceed with con- sideration of this rezoning request prior to the periodic update of the Plan. The purpose of this memorandum is to identify and evaluate the consequences of permitting development of a tract out of sequence with the existing devel- opment policy recommended in the City's Comprehensive Plan. ANALYSIS A comprehensive plan is an official document adopted by a local government as a policy guide to decisions about the physical development of a community. It is comprehensive in that it plans for a city as a whole, rather than for one or several of its component functions such as wa er supply and distribution, vehicular and pedestrian traffic, or police and fire protection. This plan is generally long-range in scope in that it looks beyond the foreground of pressing current issues to the perspective of future issues and possibili- ties. The comprehensive plan is intended to identify land uses within a community and designate the appropriate sequence of development to avoid overloading existing and planned public facilities and services. This plan provides a framework in which to program and budget for capital improvements to accommodate existing and proposed development. While the Iowa City Comprehensive Plan indicates that much of the southwest area, including Southwest Estates, will develop for residential uses within the long-range, the Plan shows Southwest Estates as an area which should not fully develop in the short-range. In determining the efficiency of develop- ment of various undeveloped parts of Iowa City, the Comprehensive Plan con- siders factors such as proximity of the undeveloped areas to the core of existing development, the availability of schools, parks and other municipal services such as police and fire protection and public transit, the availa- bility of adequate sewer capacity, and the traffic capability of existing roadway systems. Each area of the City is evaluated in the context of those factors. The Plan envisions that areas where development can take place more efficiently, in terms of the provision of municipal services, should develop first. In determining the appropriate sequence of development for the city, the Plan assumes that areas which can accommodate the greatest population for the least cost in ca ital im rovements are highly developable. As the May 21, 1987, staff report in icates, the portion of Southwest Estates zoned ID -RS which physically will be able to develop with urban services was deter- mined to be inappropriate for inmediate development due to 1) its distance from the central service provider, 2) the lack of public facilities in the area, and 3) the impact development in this area will have on sewer capacity in other developable areas to the east. Sequencing development is a growth management technique that allows a city to anticipate and to phase the expenditure of funds to provide the capital improvements and municipal services needed to accommodate new development. The growth management plan for Iowa City assumes that out of sequence devel- opment is more costly to the City and to current city residents than sequent development. Clearly, the longer the sewer and water lines and the greater the distances which must be traveled by road maintenance equipment, refuse trucks, school busses, police, fire and emergency vehicles, the more expen- sive these services are if any undeveloped properties separate existing and proposed development. The development sequence for the southwest area is based on this policy of maximizing efficiency in the provision of municipal services. The following section of this report looks at the consequences of allowing the immediate development of Southwest Estates at the residential density permitted in the RS -5 zone. The impact of that development in the context of the development policies of the 1983 Comprehensive Plan Update and the subse- quent commitments that will be required of the City in its capital improve- ments program are considered. Sewer Availability The concept plan for the future subdivision of approximately 85 acres of the 150 -acre Southwest Estates tract reveals the applicant's intention to provide municipal sewer service to the portion of the tract zoned I0 -RS as well as to a part of the tract zoned RR -1. The remaining part of the tract which is located within the Iowa City corporate limits is proposed to be served via a lift station which would pump sewage into the municipal system. The area zoned RR -1 is in a watershed which flows to the west and south, away from Iowa City's sewer system. This area cannot physically develop at urban densities without a lift station, a private treatment system, or the instal- lation of inordinately deep sewer lines which would transport sewage via gravity to the existing municipal sewer system. With the RR -1 zoning desig- nation already in place, the applicant could develop the area at the rural residential density of one dwelling unit per acre. Most likely, individual septic systems or a private treatment system would be employed to dispose of sewage. Because the applicant proposes to sewer a portion of the RR -1 zoned part of the tract via the municipal sewer system, it would be necessary to place those lines at a depth sufficiently greater than is customary in order to have the sewage flow via gravity to the City sewage collection system. Maintenance of these lines would be difficult and costly. The soils prevalent within Southwest Estates have been classified by the Soil Conservation Service to have severe limitations for septic systems with conventional lateral fields because of their slow percolation rate and char- acteristically high groundwater table. Slowly percolating soils may cause sewage effluent to breach to the surface of the ground and/or back up into indoor plumbing systems. In addition, the high water table may cause ground- water contamination. While the maintenance requirements of lift stations are not cost effective to a City if such a system serves only a few properties, that system is more efficient if a large area is served. To alleviate the maintenance problems associated with inordinately deep sewer lines and the potential health haz- ards created by the use of septic systems in soils ill-suited for those systems, the applicant should consider the use of a lift station of suffi- cient capacity to serve the entire part of his tract which is zoned RR -1 as well as the property immediately west of Slothower Road which is located within the corporate limits and which drains toward the subject tract. Sewage from this entire area would then be pumped to the collection lines 304 leading to the City's sewage treatment plant. This analysis, however, has not taken into consideration the City's ability to serve this area by the municipal sewer system. Due to limitations of the sewer system within the southwestern portion of the City, the Comprehensive Plan recommends that residential development be confined to areas east of U.S. 218. Development of the southwestern portion of Iowa City is constrained by limitations within the trunk sewer system within that area of the City. The capability of an 18 -inch sewer line is limited by a 10 -inch trunk line at the point of hook-up. A bottleneck situa- tion is created which effectively limits the sewage capacity of the system. Although sewage from approximately 438 acres of undeveloped land could natu- rally drain to the 10 -inch trunk line, due to this constraint, this line has the ability to accommodate development at only two people per acre (or ap- proximately one dwelling unit per acre) for the entire southwest area. In addition, while not all land within the southwest area is within the service area of the 10 -inch line, the area served by the 10 -inch line and other portions of the southwest area do rely on the capabilities of the Southwest Interceptor Sewer to transport sewage. Restrictions within this interceptor also limit the amount of sewer service that can be provided. If Southwest Estates is allowed to develop at urban densities, not only does it hinder the ability to develop other properties within the service area of the 10 -inch line, but it could diminish the ability of the interceptor system to accommo- date sewage generated by existing and proposed developments east of U.S. 218 and the Hunters Run Subdivision immediately west of U.S. 218 (see Appendix B.2, 1983 Update). If development elsewhere in the southwest area is not to be restricted, approval of this rezoning request would escalate the need for the City to make the improvements needed within the municipal sewer system to provide sewer services to the southwest area. Costs for construction of sewer lines within a development are borne by the developer. The costs of increasing the sizes of or upgrading a trunk or interceptor sewer, however, are generally financed by the City through bonds which are retired by sewer fees. It is estimated that upgrading the 10 -inch trunk line to eliminate the constraints in sewer capacity it causes would cost $64,000. Needed improvements to the Southwest Interceptor system are expected to cost $160,000. Although operational costs of the sewer system are paid through user fees, until full development of the area which is out of sequence with a commu- nity's development policy occurs, the lion's share of the cost of operating a system to the out of sequence area must be subsidized by existing commercial and residential users who do not directly benefit by the installation of that new system. Based on the assumption that out of sequence development is more costly to a city and its residents than phased development, the growth management poli- cies of the 1983 Comprehensive Plan Update discourage development west of U.S. 218 at this time. Allocations for improvements to the sewage system serving the southwest area are, therefore, not proposed within the timeframe of the current five-year Capital Improvements Program (CIP). t3ft As stated, development of Southwest Estates at urban densities would acceler- ate the need for approximately $224,000 in improvements to the municipal sewer system. Until that development and the development of intervening undeveloped areas are complete, the burden of financing those improvements falls upon the City and existing developed portions of the community. Water Service At the applicant's expense, an oversized water main has been extended from the Hunters Run Subdivision, located immediately west of the U.S. 218 right- of-way, to the existing Southwest Estates subdivision. This 12 -inch main is a segment of a looped system which will serve the southwest area. The loop is expected to be created with the extension of the main northwesterly from Phoenix Drive, north along Slothower Road to the main located along Melrose Avenue. The purpose of this looped system is to provide an adequate amount of water pressure and volume to residents living within the western portion of the southwest area. While a portion of the cost of the oversized water mains is generally borne by the City, the City's policy has been to discourage the development of subdivisions inconsistent with the growth management policies of the Compre- hensive Plan. Therefore, with approval of the plats for the existing South- west Estates subdivisions, the developer was required to pay the full cost of the extension of an oversized water main through these subdivisions. Continued development of the western portion of the southwest area precip- itates the need to implement the looped system in order to provide sufficient water pressures and volumes within this area. The cost of creating this loop by extending the water main from the intersection of Phoenix Drive and Slothower Road north to Melrose Avenue is expected to be $64,800. This expense is not anticipated in the City's current Capital Improvements Pro- gram. Street Improvements In conjunction with the scheduled update of the Comprehensive Plan, provi- sions for a secondary arterial street to serve the southwest area are being studied. It is anticipated that, with development of the southwest area, an arterial street, in addition to Melrose Avenue, will be required to circulate traffic generated by the potential development. Major public expenditures for the improvement of streets outside the proposed subdivision is another City service, however, which was not planned for this area in the short-range timeframe of the Plan and the corresponding Capital Improvements Plan. While a portion of Slothower Road is expected to function as a secondary arterial street within the southwest area, the appropriate alignment of this arterial street has not been determined. If Slothower Road, from Rohret Road to Melrose Avenue, is regarded as the most suitable alignment, it is esti- mated the cost of improving this roadway to urban design standards would be $783,000. On the other hand, if Phoenix Drive is expected to serve as a portion of this arterial street system, the cost of improving Slothower Road from its intersection with Phoenix Drive north to Melrose Avenue would be $296,000. Although the Capital Improvements Program provides for improvements to Rohret Road from its intersection with Melrose Avenue westerly to the U.S. 218 bridge, the CIP did not anticipate development of the southwest area at the density requested by the proposal at hand. Consequently, further roadway improvements needed to accommodate this development were not scheduled within the five year timeframe of the CIP. Traffic generated by development of the western portion of the southwest area is expected to accelerate the need for signalizing and widening the intersec- tion of Melrose Avenue and Rohret Road to accommodate turning movements and to facilitate the circulation of traffic on these roadways. Signalizing the intersection is expected to cost $20,000; widening the intersection to fa- cilitate turning traffic would cost approximately $150,000. Rohret Road, in its existing condition, is incapable of serving the amount of traffic that can be expected to be generated by residential development of the southwest area at urban densities. Upgrading Rohret Road to urban stan- dards from the U.S. 218 bridge to Slothower Road would cost approximately $917,000. If Phoenix Drive is to function as a segment of the secondary arterial street system for the southwest area, improvements to Rohret Road from the bridge to its intersection with Phoenix Drive would cost about $558,000. While improvements to Rohret Road would include provisions for a sidewalk to accommodate pedestrian traffic, pedestrian circulation would be impeded by the lack of a walkway along the Rohret Road bridge which spans U.S. 218. To assure pedestrian safety, a sidewalk would have to be installed adjacent to the bridge which would link residents with schools, parks, and other services located east of U.S. 218. Due to the type of crosswalk which would have to be constructed over a U.S, highway, the cost of the sidewalk would be ap- proximately $190,000. Depending upon the alignment of the secondary arterial serving the southwest area, development of the southwest area at urban densities at this time would expedite the need to implement between $1,214,000 and $2,060,000 in roadway improvements west of U.S. Highway 218. Fire and Emergency Services Development of the southwest area out of sequence with the growth management policies of the Comprehensive Plan may require considerable capital expendi- ture in order to maintain the Fire Department's average response time to a fire or emergency call at 3.5 minutes. The rate and intensity of development west of U.S. 218 will determine the extent to which capital commitments in the way of additional equipment and/or relocation of the Westside Fire Sta- tion will have to be made in order to maintain this standard of service. While a portion of the capital and operational costs of fire and emergency services provided by the City is financed by the University, approximately 70% of the costs are funded by property taxes. Until the area west of U.S. 218 is completely developed, the costs of providing these services to this area will have to be subsidized by existing development or the level of service provided to the area will be less than the expected urban level of service. m Refuse Removal and Street Maintenance The capital and operational expenditures for refuse removal and street main- tenance are supported by monthly service charges to residential users. Pres- ently, these services are being provided to the existing residences within the Southwest Estates subdivisions and along Rohret Road. While average costs to service out of sequence development will increase slightly to sup- port the additional mileage costs, additional costs due to distance decreases as development progresses since "gaps" between refuse pickups no longer exist and more households are present to support the street maintenance service. The economies of scale collapse, however, if the new development requires that additional equipment be purchased and more personnel be hired in order to serve the area. Transit Operational costs are financed through fares, property taxes, a special transit levy, parking fees, and through state and federal grants. Experience has shown that transit routes to low density, outlying areas of the City are costly in that fare receipts only pay for approximately one-fifth of the cost of that service. With increased density of development and as intervening tracts develop, it becomes more feasible to provide transit services to the margins of the City. Until that development occurs, however, it may not be cost effective to provide this service to areas which have developed out of sequence with the development policies of the City's Comprehensive Plan. Schools The 1983 Comprehensive Plan Update indicates that no elementary school sites are designated with the southwest area. This is in recognition of a School Board policy, based upon expected declines in elementary school enrollment and the need to reassign some neighborhoods to alternate elementary schools, to maintain the viability of existing facilities and to increase overall operational efficiency within the Iowa City school system. Because some existing elementary facilities are presently below capacity, it is expected that shifts would be made within existing schools to accommodate elementary school -aged children residing in future developments west of U.S. 218. While capital expenditures such as new school construction is not anticipated with urban development of the southwest area west of U.S. 218, operational expenses associated with bussing students to existing schools can be expected to increase. The school system is obligated by state law to provide bussing to elementary- and high school -aged students whose homes are a certain dis- tance from the schools they attend. Increasing the development density of the southwest area out of sequence with the City's development policy for that area may require the school system to evaluate existing load distribu- tions and to either reroute busses as needed or, if necessary, to contract for the use of additional busses to serve the area. SUMMARY OF ANTICIPATED IMPROVEMENTS Presented below is a summary of the major anticipated improvements which will be necessary with the development of the southwest area east and west of U.S. 218. Although not all of these improvements will be required immediately for Southwest Estates to develop, the improvements will be necessary sooner than T V D the City has planned for them in the allocation of resources for capital improvements. With development of the extremity of the area, there will be a time when these improvements will be required and the cost, if met in the usual manner, will be borne by existing development subsidizing the opportu- nity for growth on the edge of the community. In the table, Alternate A represents the total costs based on Slothower Road being the accepted alignment for a north/south corridor between Melrose Avenue and Rohret Road. Alternate B is based on Phoenix Drive being part of the north/south corridor. While extension of utilities to an undeveloped tract at the developer's expense and payment of overwidth paving and oversized mains defray part of the cost to the City of out of sequence development, there are other services that a City must provide to that development that cannot be efficiently provided. The cost of these services, unless subsidized by the developer, are passed along to other residents of the community until such time as that area and intervening tracts are developed and can support the cost of those services. While over time, urban growth with a proper mix of commercial, industrial and residential uses pays for itself, in a period of relatively slow growth, it is likely to be many years before a development developed out of phase with a city's growth management policy is fully developed and pro- ducing the revenues for the City which may result in its paying for itself. ALTERNATE A ALTERNATE B SEWER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS Upgrade 10 -inch line between Mormon Trek Boulevard and West High School $ 64,000 $ 64,000 Upgrade various sections of the Southwest Interceptor Sewer 160,000 160,000 WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS Looped water main 64,800 64,800 STREET IMPROVEMENTS Slothower Road Improvements 783,000 296,000 Signalization of the Mormon Trek Boulevard/Rohret Road intersection 20,000 20,000 Widening of Mormon Trek Boulevard/ Rohret Road intersection 150,000 150,000 Rohret Road Improvements 917,000 558,000 Rohret Road Bridge Sidewalk 190,000 190,000 TOTAL $2,348,000 $1,502,800 STAFF RECOMMENDATION While extension of utilities to an undeveloped tract at the developer's expense and payment of overwidth paving and oversized mains defray part of the cost to the City of out of sequence development, there are other services that a City must provide to that development that cannot be efficiently provided. The cost of these services, unless subsidized by the developer, are passed along to other residents of the community until such time as that area and intervening tracts are developed and can support the cost of those services. While over time, urban growth with a proper mix of commercial, industrial and residential uses pays for itself, in a period of relatively slow growth, it is likely to be many years before a development developed out of phase with a city's growth management policy is fully developed and pro- ducing the revenues for the City which may result in its paying for itself. 4 O dl Based upon the increased costs the City would incur as a result of developing the subject tract out of sequence with the growth management objectives of the southwest area, staff recommends that the request to rezone this tract from RR -1 and ID -RS to RS -5 be denied. ATTACHMENTS 1. Staff report dated May 21, 1987. i Approved by: rnald S hmeiser, Director epartment of Planning & Program Development /sp 3 Y 0 STAFF REPORT To: Planning & Zoning Commission Prepared by: Karin Franklin Item: Z-8703. Southwest Estates. Date: May 21, 1987 GENERAL INFORMATION Applicant: Frank Eicher P.O. Box 2178 Iowa City, Iowa Requested action: To rezone undeveloped land from ID -RS and RR -1 to RS -5. Purpose: Single family residential devel- opment. Location: Southwest Iowa City, north of Rohret Road, south of the Johnson County Care Facility, east of Slothower Road and west of Hunt- ers Run Subdivision. Size: 84.73 acres. Comprehensive Plan: Short-range - rural residential; agriculture. Long-range - rural residential and urban single- family residential, 2-8 OU/acre. Existing land use and zoning: Agriculture, undeveloped; RR -1 and ID -RS. Surrounding land use and zoning: North - Johnson County Care Facility; P. East - Agriculture; ID -RS. South - Rural residential, agri- culture, undeveloped; RR -1. West - Agriculture; RR -1. 45 -day Imitation period June 22,1987 ANALYSIS Background Frank Eicher, owner of a tract of land in southwest Iowa City known as South- west Estates, has submitted an application to rezone an 84 acre tract from ID -RS, interim development residential single-family, and RR -1, rural resi- dential, to RS -5, residential single-family. ape RS -5 is the least dense urban residential zone, permitting approximately five dwelling units/acre. It is widely used and represents the predominant low- density single-family character of the community. RR -1 is the only rural residential category, permitting development at a rural density of one dwell- ing unit/acre. It is used only in those areas in which the provision of gravity flow municipal sewer service is not anticipated due to topographic constraints. Areas zoned RR -1 will develop at a low rural density and rely on septic systems or private treatment plants and on private water supplies in most instances. The IO -RS zone is a zone in which the immediate develop- ment of the land was not anticipated in the Comprehensive Plan. The delay in development is due to the infeasibility of extending services, primarily sewer service, to these areas in the short term of the Plan. Properties zoned 10 -RS are intended to develop at urban densities (RS -5, RS -8, or RS -12) when services become available and when existing development has grown to reach them. Comorehensive Plan The Comprehensive Plan shows Southwest Estates as an area which should not fully develop in the short-range. To determine the efficiency of development of various undeveloped parts of Iowa City, factors such as proximity to the core of existing development, the availability of schools and parks, and the availability of adequate sewer capacity were considered and each area was evaluated in the context of these factors. The idea was that the most effi- cient development, in terms of the provision of municipal services, should develop first. The portion of Southwest Estates zoned ID -RS which physically will be able to develop with urban services was determined to be inappropri- ate for immediate development due to 1) its distance from the central service provider, 2) the lack of public facilities in the area, and 3) the impact development in this area would have on sewer capacity in other developable areas to the east. The remaining part of Southwest Estates, zoned RR -1, cannot physically develop at urban densities without a lift station for the sewer, private treatment systems or inordinately deep sewers which could create maintenance problems. This area is in a watershed which flows to the west and south away from Iowa City's sewer system. Previous Commission Discussion On February 17, 1987, Mr. Eicher presented a letter to the Commission re- questing that the area zoned ID -RS east of the platted portions of Southwest Estates on Phoenix Drive be considered for rezoning from ID -RS to RS -5. Consideration of that request would require amendment of the Comprehensive Plan as would consideration of the request at hand. The Commission informed Mr. Eicher's representative that amendment of the plan relative to Southwest Estates would be given priority in the general update of the plan to be done in the winter of '87-'88, but that consideration of the change would not be addressed immediately. STAFF RECOMMENDATION The staff recommends that the requested rezoning for Southwest Estates be deferred pending consideration of the Comprehensive Plan update. 3 ATTACHMENTS 1. Location map. 2. Legal description. 3. Letter from Mr. Eicher dated January 29, 1987. Approved by: trona d Sc meiser, Director Department of Planning and Program Development 11 r •W G IS31 MARIAN K. KARR CITY CLEF.'( (3) LEGAL DESCRIPTION Request for rezoning from IDRS and RR -1 to RS -5 Commencing at a Concrete Monument which marks the Southeast corner of the Southeast Quarter of Section 13, Township 79 North, Range 7 West of the 5th. Principal Meridian; Thence N00053142"E, along the East line of said Southeast Quarter of Section 13, 417.00 feet to a point on the Northerly Right of Way Line of Rohret Road, said point also being the Southeasterly corner of Lot 1 of Southwest Estates Subdivision, Part One, and the Point of Beginning; Thence Southwesterly, along said Right of Way 155.20 feet, on a 1950.00 foot radius curve, concave Southeasterly, whose 155.16 foot chord bears S70°34138"W; Thence S6801714911W, along said Right of Way line, 66.03 feet; Thence Northwesterly 23.56 feet, along a 15.00 foot radius curve, concave Northeasterly, whose 21.21 foot chord bears N66942111"W; Thence N21.42'11"W, 276.67 feet to the Northwesterly corner of Lot 2 of said Subdivision; Thence Northwesterly 204.63 feet, along a 518.82 foot radius curve, concave Northeasterly, whose 203.30 foot chord bears N10°24115"W; Thence N00°53142"E, 172.49 feet; Thence Northwesterly 1068.14 feet, along a 680.00 foot radius curve, concave Southwesterly, whose 961.67 foot chord bears N44°06118"W; Thence N89°06118"W, 115.31 feet; Thence S00°53142"W, 310.00 feet along the westerly line of lot 17 of Sout:,West Estates Subdivision, Part 2; Thence S06037'04"W, 480.92 feet along the westerly line of lot 11 of said Subdivision; S67°40'29"W, 200.00 feet along the northwesterly line of lot 10 of said Subdivision; Thence N54°00106"W, 662.14 feet; Thence N29"13'15"E, 60.57 feet; Thence N07.30100"E, 297.07 feet; Thence N22'30100"E, 55.00 feet; Thence N67"30000"W, 336.00 feet; Thence S33.30100"W, 173.50 feet; Thence S49"4510011W, 230.00 feet; Thence N40'1510011W, 158.00 feet; Thence N89°0311011W, 99.47 feet to a point on the west line of the Southeast Quarter of said Section 13, Thence NOO'56'50"E, 1073.84 feet to the Northwest corner of the Southeast Quarter of said Section 13; Thence N89°40115"E, 2642.75 feet to the Northeast corner of the Southeast Quarter of said Section 13; Thence SOO'5314211W, 2223.48 feet along the east line of the Southeast Quarter of said Section 13 to the Point of Beginning; Said tract of land contains 64.73 'acres more or less and is subject to easements and restrictions of record. OQC�1 6 IE37 SEVILLE January 29, 1987 CORPORATION REAL ESTATE 940 MAIDEN LANE P.O. BOX 2178 IOWA CITY, IOWA 52244 (319) 351.2412 Karin Franklin, Sr. Planner Dept of Planning 8 Program Development City of Iowa City, Civic Center 410 E Washington St. Iowa City, Iowa 52240 Re: Request for consideration of an amendment to the Iowa City Comprehensive Plan, that would allow for further development of Southwest Estates. Dear Karin: In accordance with our discussions on January 26th, 1987, Seville Corporation is respectfully requesting that serious consideration be given to an amendment to the Iowa City Comprehensive Plan that would allow additional development of the Southwest Estates Subdivision(s). Specifically, Seville Corporation's request for the amendment, is to facilitate a desire to acquire RS -5 Zoning in lieu of the current RR -1 Zoning for that portion of Southwest Estates lying East of Phoenix Drive, and RS- R Zoning in lieu of at least a portion of the current ID -RS Zoning. The RS -5 Zoning is desired so that it may be more cost effective to extend sanitary sewer service to Southwest Estates from the existing sewer line that serves the Johnson County Care Facility. If the amendment is approved, It Is intended that the sanitary sewer extension will be installed by Seville Corporation, at no cost to the City of Iowa City, and that in addition to serving the future addition(s), the sewer line Is intended to be designed to serve a portion of the lots in Parts One and Two. Seville Corporation is aware of the usual arguments against a request of this nature, le "leap -frog development" and "inordinate costs for services incurred by the City due to non-contiguous development", 'however, they would like to remind the Commission and Council, that, to date, all improvements for Southwest Estates Subdivisions have been provided without the usual "City" contributions for overwidth pavement or oversize watermalns. The only 'costs' currently Incurred by the City are for refuse pick-up, police patrol, and street maintenance. These services are currently provided for the residents along Rhoret Road as far West as Southwest Estates. Additional development and increased revenue should make these services more cost effective. Seville Corporation Is aware that there arc currently some number of platted lots available In the Western portion of Iowa City, and that there are several sizable undeveloped tracts in the West Side Area. Seville Corporation also believes that the values of these tracts have been unfairly Inflated by Intentionally excluding other properties from being developed, further contributing to the cost of housing in Iowa City, Each of us can make our own projections as to when Iowa City might be reasonably expected to grow into the undeveloped areas. However, there are many factors that Influence the actual growth patterns that are very difficult to project. Iowa City's current zoning ordinance was prepared to provide for generally smaller, M Page :2 January 29, 1987 ATTR: Karin Franklin, Sr. Planner and presumably less costly lots. However, a significant portion of the current housing demand appears to be for larger lots for the "move -up" home buyer. Southwest Estates is intended to give these buyers that choice. The growth projections associated with the "High -Tech Industries" may or may not be a significant factor in the future growth patterns of Iowa City. As private developers, we feel that we should be able to make our own projections and decisions regarding these issues so long as the rights of others are not being violated, and inordinate public funds are not required to support the development. Seville Corporation believes that "leap -frog development" is not a reasonable descriptive term for tills development. The original use of this terminology was in reference to much greater distances between developments than are currently available anywhere in Iowa City, and often included the necessity for the City to provide, or participate In the provision of the infrastructure to the satellite development(s), therefore, we do not feel this reasoning to be applicable to the Southwest Estates Addition. One of the primary goals of the City has previously been to encourage "compact and contiguous development". We should all be aware, that for various reasons, this goal is not likely to be achieved. Certain landowners may not wish to have their property developed at the current time, while others may be holding out for higher purchase offers. There are probably as many reasons as there are property owners. Even though contiguous development isn't achieved, there will be a benefit to the City In the end, in that these intervening undeveloped properties may provide valuable locations for such facilities and/or amenities as may be determined to be appropriate for that vicinity. If the property values haven't been Inflated artificially, it may then be possible to acquire the properties for the desired use at a more reasonable cost. In summary, Seville Corporation would appreciate the opportunity to continue development of Southwest Estates In a timely manner for the following reasons: (1) They believe there will be a continued demand for residential lots in this portion of Iowa City. (2) Though there are significant undeveloped properties between Southwest Estates and Mormon Trek Boulevard. many of those properties may not be developed in the Immediate future for reasons as stated above. (8) While Exclusionary Zoning (TO- RS) may have an appropriate function In controlling the growth of areas where there is extremely limited Sanitary Sewer capacity, It should not be used as a "growth Inhibitor" because it artificially inflates the value of properties zoned for development. (4) Remanent parcels may have a valuable function in the overall development scheme if they can be acquired by the City for specific uses. ' FJE/cas Sincerely, SEVILLE CORPORATION Frank J. Eicher, President J 0 µ p RESOLUTION 110. 86-101 RESOLUTION TO RESTATE THE POLICY THAT NO PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS BE MADE TO ROHRET ROAD WEST OF FREEWAY 218 OR SLOTHOWEP, ROAD BEFORE 1998. WHEREAS, the 1983 Comprehensive Plan Update for the City of Iowa City is a guide to the development of Iowa City; and WHEREAS, the Plan projects that compact and contiguous development of the City will not extend to the southwest area -until approximately 1998; and WHEREAS, the City of Iowa City bases its Capital Improvements Program on the de- velopment phases and sequences of growth set forth in the Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, based upon its projections for growth in the southwest area, no capital improvements are planned for the southwest area until 1998 or later; and WHEREAS, some rural residential development exists in the southwest area and more may take place before 1998; and WHEREAS, the City's intentions regarding the improvement of Rohret Road and Slothower Road should be clearly stated for the residents, who may be assessed for a portion of the cost of paving these roads when they are improved. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF IOWA CITY: That other than routine maintenance, the City of Iowa City will make no public improvements to Rohret Road west of Freeway 218 or to Slothower Road before 1998. It was moved by \IcDonald and seconded by Dickson the Resolution be adopted, and upon roll call there were: AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: — s— AMBRISCO BAKER COURTNEY _ DICKSON �— MCDONALD _ STRAIT — X LUBER Passed and approved this 8th day of April , 1986. �, AA, ` / MAYO el ATTEST: ?Ia. ii _el Rwtved 8 Approved Z By The legal Depaftml afe HMCE OF RELIC WJPJM Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the City Council of Iowa City, Iowa, at I / 7:30 p.m. on the 12th day of January, 1988, in the �JF Civic Center Council Chambers, lova City, Iowa; at which hearing the Council will consider the follow- ing items: 1. A resolution adopting an addendum to the 1983 Canprehensive Plan Update which addresses devel- opmert proposals art of sequence with the growth management policy espoused in the Comprehensive Plan Update. 2. A resolution amending the 1983 Canp•ehensive Plan Update to reclassify the lard use designa- tion of a tract krno n as Southwest Estates which is located within the corporate limits of Iowa City, north of Rhret Road and east of Slothower Road fran Agricultural/Rural Residential to Residential at a density of 2-8 Belling units per acre. ODs. 1 An ordinance to rezone an 84.73 acre tract krim OD as Southwest Estates from ID -RS, Interim Devel- opnmt - Single -Family Residential, and RR -1, / Rural Residential, to RS -5, Low Density Sin- gle -Family Residential. 4. An ordinance anendirg Section 36-8 of the Zoning Ordinance regarding the storage of spe- cial vehicles. 5. An ordinance to rezone an approximate 1.8 acre tract located east of Boyrun Street and north of Olympic Circle fron I-1, General Industrial, to CI -1, Intensive Commercial. Copies of the proposed anmerinents are on file for public examination at the Office of the City Clerk, Civic Center, Lowe City, Iowa. Persons wishing to make their views known for Council consideration are encouraged toappear at the above-mentioned time and place. WRIAN K. KARiR, CITY CLERK 30500 LATTICE OF PUELIC IfAWC Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the City Council of Iaa City, Iowa, at 7:30 p.m. on the 12th day of January, 1988, in the Civic Center Council Chambers, Iowa City, Ione; at which hearing the Council will consider the follow- ing iters: 1. A resolution adopting an addendum to the 1983 COnprehensive Plan Update which addresses devel- Opnent proposals out of sequence with the growth manageneut policy espoused in the COrprehensive Plan Update. 2. A resolution emending the 1963 Canprehensive Plan Update to reclassify the lard use designa- tion of a tract knovn as Southwest Estates which is located within the corporate limits Of Iowa City, north of R)hret Road and east of Slothover Road from Agricultural/Rural Residential to Residential at a density of 2-8 dwelling units per acre. 3. Al ordinance to rezone on 84.73 acre tract khan as Southwest Estates from ID -RS, Interim Devel- opment - Single -Family Residential, and R2-1, Rural Residential, to RS -5, Low Density Sin- gle -Family Residential. V An ordinance amending Section 36-58 of the Zoning Ordinance regarding the storage of spe- cial vehicles. 5. An ordinance to rezone an approximate 1.8 acre tract located east of Boyrun Street and north of Olynpic Circle from I-1, General Industrial, to CI -1, Intensive Commercial. Copies of the proposed amendments are on file for public examination at the Office of the City Clerk, Civic Center, Iawa City, Iowa. Persons wishing to make their views knan for Council consideration are encouraged toappear at the above-mentioned time and place. MARIAN K. KARR, CITY CLERK Cx'( 92 CROINAhCE NO. AN CROMCE TO MD SECTICN 36-58(g) OF THE Md- NICIPAL CODE RELATING TO U STORAGE Or SPECIAL VEHICLES AND WATERCRAFT. WHEREAS, certain items, such as seni-trailer trucks, and recreational vehicles, and boats on trailers, are larger than regular family vehicles, such as autormcbiles and vans, and may be obtrusive if parked or stored in residential areas; and WHEREAS, it is in the public interest to regulate the location of storage areas for special vehicles in single-family residential areas in order to minimize the negative impacts of such vehicles and watercraft on neighboring properties, whfle respect- ing the right of individuals to " and use such iters. U, THEREFCRE, BE rr OR0 MD BY TPE CITY COIN - CIL OF THE CITY OF ICWA CITY, ICWA, THAT: SECTION I. NEOWS. Section 36-58(g) of the Cede of Ordinances is hereby deleted and the follow- ing is inserted in lieu thereof: (g) Special Vehicle and Watercraft Parking and St�oraae (1) General Provisions. a. Definitions. Special Vehicle. Every device, more than sever and one-half (7-1/2) feet in height or more than 20 feet in legth, vhich is or may be transported or drawl upon a highway, street or body of water, including without limitation, any motor vehicle, truck, trailer, tractor, wagon, watercraft, or any carbination thereof, exceeding these (ten- sions. Storage area. A space, equal in size to the outer perimeter of a special vehicle, used for storage of such a vehicle. b. Except for the purpose of making local deliveries, no vehicle designed for the shipnemt of detonable or Flammable solids, liquids or gases shall be parked or stored on any lot in an R zone. (2) Requirements. In the RR -1, Rs -5, RS -8 and RS -12 zones, special vehicle storage shall comply with the following requirenmants: a. Pb special vehicle may be stored in a front yard, except on a regularly constructed aisle for a period of no more than four days for the purpose of loading and unload- ing. b. A special vehicle may be stored inside any building provided it is not stored in a required parking space. KM Ordinance No. Page 2 A special vehicle stored outside a building shall: 1. Belong to the Omer or tenant of the property on which the vehicle is lo- cated, except for special vehicles of guests, as provided in subsection 3 below; 2. Be in operational condition and prop- erly licensed as required by state or federal law; 3. Wt be unto for dwelling purposes except by guests of the property Omer or tenant for a period of no more than 21 consecutive days or 45 days in any calendar year (an extension may be approved by the City Forager or his/he- designee); 4. Nit be used for storage of items other than those considered to be part of the unit; and 5. Not be parked or stored upon a vacant residential lot. d. A special vehicle may be stored outside a building in the required side yard (except along a street) or in a required rear yard, provided: 1. The vehicle is no closer than three (3) feet to a side lot line, or to a rear lot line of a reversed corner lot; 2. The storage area is surfaced with crushed rock, asphalt, concrete, or a similar surface designed and maintained to prevent muddy conditions, erosion, the flow of nater onto adjoining prop- erty, and weed growth. In cases where crushed rock is used, the perimeter of such storage area shall be defined by bricks, railroad ties, or similar materials; and 3, fb more than 30 percent of a required rear yard may be occupied by accessory structures and a special vehicle stor- age area. e. hue City Mmage• or his/her designee may permit outside storage of a special vehicle in the required front yard, or the required side yard along a street, provided: 1. Storage space is not available in or there is no access to either the side or rear yard. For purposes of this section e, a corner lot shall always be deemed to have access to the rear yard; Ordinance No. Page 3 a and accessory structures and buildings less than 160 square feet in area, or vegetation which is transplantable, are not deered to prevent access; 2. Inside storage is not possible because the size of the special vehicle exceeds either the space available or the size of the entrance available in any exist- ing building, or both; 3. The special vehicle is parked perpen- dicular to the street; 4. A planting screen is planted and main- tained in accordance with the Fence and Hedge Require ants, Section 36-65, and the Perfcrnence Requirements, Section 36-76(j). 5. No part of the special vehicle extends beyond the property line or over public right-of-way. Nonconforming Storage Areas. 1. A special vehicle owner or lessee mey establish non -conforming status for a special vehicle storage area which, on the date of adoption of these regula- tions, is located in a required front yard, or the required side yard along a street, if it can be deanstrated that there is no access to either the side or rear yard. If access to either the side or rear yard is available, a non -conforming storage area shall be relocated to either the side yard or rear yard within two (2) years after passage of this regulation. 2. Nonconforming status for a special vehicle storage area shall be estab- lished by submitting to the Deparhant of Housing and Inspection Services by (12 months after the date of adoption of these regulations) a plot plan show- ing the location, design and size of the storage area, and the surface material existing on the storage area. 3. After (12 months after the date of adoption of these regulations), non- conforming status of existing special vehicle storage areas ray not be estab- lished. 4. A non-confaming special vehicle stor- age area which is not used for a period of one (1) year, for any reason, inten- tional or otherwise, shall not thereaf- ter be permitted for special vehicle Ordinance No, Page 4 storage unless the area is brought into full canpliance with these regulations. SECTION II. REPEALER. All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provision of this Ordinance are hereby repealed. SECTION III. SEVERABILITY. If any section, provi- sion or part of the Ordinance shall be adjudged to be invalid or unconstitutional, such adjudication shall not affect the validity of the Ordinance as a chole or any section, provision or part thereof not adjudged invalid or unconstitutional. SECTION IV. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall in a ec a eras ina passage, approval and publication as required by law. Passed and approval this NAYCR ATTEST: CITY CLFAC 1ecolv1d a Appmved BY The�a0al Cc^.arfrpent a �� V P RECEIVEDJP-M 1? M3 L °ASI 1 21988 MARIAN K. KARR Ci�iL. 1'!Ui• ��Z� �r _ CITY CLERK (3) /�%,J1rs,yROl C's'YIVInC2C�,[—l% y�Lt;�L,Cccc� /L�LC�fcJ, 06 M —.9- � oa�� !AN 1 21988 MARIAN K. KARR CITY CLERK (3) Gz�u lu' cah 9tPu�tr'�eeJ Ect�ca� -6 t d'o•- )Vwwlt ;4 a -Le Pc , .mater tiv-e� wa�P ,(,70 /JUz.Q aqc Titw,l Li 7t6"U / 2z 0. Gec�u irrLee�e a cz, allv�2e n-a�e '��ty ,�L�ic-c. /�L'tcL r•� cj�2``7.icj L�Uh.. � rJ.�l/lr:-ci �tiMZi�i%L�-4� �/ �-G�-C.Jt1UY�'C.t �(/�Lu G(J�vi/✓!t-ct� �p SLC T�c..�:.��2D�LL� �o �e�!�C�fRri�iz���2ceeu, ,,'ce u 64 Gleason Drive Iowa City, Iowa 52240 January 11, 1987 The Honorable Mayor and City Council Members 410 East Washington Iowa City, Iowa 52240 Dear Mayor McDonald and Council Members: I am writing to you concerning the ordinance regarding the storage of special vehicles for which you are having a public hearing at your regular meeting. I have been waiting for 13 years for the City Council to enact an ordinance which will rid neighborhoods of the unsightly storage of large vehicles in front yards or at least one which would require some setback from the front property lines. As you can surmise, we have one of these vehicles next door to our property. We try to be good neighbors and do not want to start a feud with people with whom we must live near day to day. I realize that the RV owners are well organized and are vocal, whereas we who do not have RVs are not. Most of us want to get along with our neighbors and therefore do not complain. That is why you have not heard from our side. After reading the proposed ordinance, however, I feel I must write. This ordinance obviously was written under pressure from RV owners. Its provisions are more lax than those set forth in the previous ordinance. Under this ordinance a person could park a semi -truck in ones front yard if there is not access to the rear or side yard. Is this really what you want for Iowa City? One cannot erect permanent buildings in the required front yards, yet some RVs are moved only occasionally (the one next door to our property is moved perhaps two to three times a year), and therefore is no different than a permanent building. We have worked very hard to landscape our property and, like most Iowa Citians, take pride in the appearance of our neighborhood. Yet our efforts are diminished by the unsightly vehicle which is parked on the grass and reaches up to the side- walk. I realize your proposed ordinance would require that the vehicles be parked on crushed rock or cement. However, I would not want gravel spread on the lawn next to ours since it would soon spread and kill our grass too. I ask that you consider the interests of all Iowa Citians, including your own, and not yield to those who are most vocal. I urge you to rewrite the ordinance to, at the very least, require a reasonable setback from the front property line. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely purs, John R. Saeger JAN 1 21988 MARIAN K. KARR CITY CLERK (3) 9? NOME OF RJOLIC WARM Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the City foucil of lea City, love, at 7:30 P.M. on the 12th day of January, 1988, in the Civic Center Council Charters, love City, Imo; at which hearing the Council will consider the follow- ing items: 1. A resolution adopting an addendum to the 1983 Carprehensive Plan Update which addresses devel- opnent proposals out of sequence with the growth management policy espoused in the Carprehensive Plan Update. 2. A resolution aiding the 1983 Canp•ehensive Plan Update to reclassify the lard use designa- tion of a tract knave as Southwest Estates ouch is located within the corporate limits of Iowe City, north of R)hret Road and east of Slothower Read fron Agricultural/Rural Residential to Residential at a density of 2-8 "llinng units per acre. 3. An ordinance to rezone an 84.73 acre tract known as Southwest Estates from IO -RS, Interim Devel- oprrnt - Single -Family Residential, and R2-1, Rural Residential, to RS -5, Low Density Sin- gle -Family Residential. 4. An ordinance amending Section 36-8 of the Zoning ordinance regarding the storage of spe- cial vehicles. 5. An ordinance to rezone an approximate 1.8 acre tract locates east of Boyrum Street and north of Olympic Circle from I-1, Ceneral Industrial, to CI -1, Intensive Carmercial. Copies of the proposed arandnerts are on file for public exanination at the Office of the City Clerk, Civic Center, Iowa City, Iowa. Persons wishing to cake their views kr n for Council consideration are encouraged toappear at the above-mentioned time and place. MARIAN K. KAM, CITY CLERK ORDINAICE NO. AN OMrfWNCE A''ENOINIG THE ZONING ORDINANCE BY CHANG- ING T!E USE REGULATIONS OF PROPERTIES LOCATED EAST OF BOYRIM STREET AND NORTH OF OLYMPIC CIRCLE. WFEREAS, in accordance with the Zoning Ord- nance, Southgate Developreit Canpany, owner of the subject parcels, has made application to rezone the Properties frau 1-1, General Industrial, to CI -1, Intensive Com rcial; and WIEREAS, the short-range developnent plan of the Im City Crnprehensive Plan recanmerds that these Properties develop for intensive came-cial use; and WHEPEAS, the CI -1 zoning classification is consistent with the Carprehensive Plan designation for this area. NOW, 7FEREFCRE, BE IT ORDAINED BY 1}E CITY COIICIL OF THE CITY OF IOdA CITY, IOWA: SECTION I. ZONING ANENINENT. That the proper- ties escri a ad are hereby reclassified fran their present classification of 1-1 to CI -1. PARCEL A In Tawnship 79 North, Range 6 Vkst of the 5th P.M., Section 15, S.W. 1/4 of the S.E. 1/4 thereof, a tract of land described as fol lam: Beginning at the point on the Hest line Of Lloyd's Subdivision which lies SOo17'OO'E, 203.00 feet fran the N.W. corner of Lot 2 of Lloyd's Subdivision in Im City, Im, according to the plat recorded in Plat Book 7, page 25, Plat Retards of Johnson County, las; thence S00 17'00"E, 363.30 feet; thence S87%940 166.00 feet; thence N10o18'13. W, 369.75 feet; thence N189043'00" E, 166.00 feet to the point of beginning. Said tract contains 1.40 acres more or less. PARCEL B The south 190 feet of land described as follows: The S.E. quarter of Section 15, Towship 79 North, Range 6 West of the 5th P.M. in IOA City, Johnson County, Iowa: Cam ening at a point marked by an iron pin, Wch point is on the South line of said Section 15 and bears S87o39'W, 240.0 feet from the Southeast corner of the SouthHest 1/q of the Southeast 1/4 of said Section 15; thence 58703391W for a distance of 103.1 feet; thence NOoI7'W for a distance of 566.3 feet. thence S69048'E for a distance of 110.6 feet along the Southerly line of High - a 437 Ordinance No. Page 2 way No. 6; thence S0017'E for a dis- tance of 524.0 feet to the point of beginning. SECTION II. ZONING NAP. The Building Inspector is hereby authorized and directed to change the zoning map of the City of Ioa City, to conform to this anendnent upon the final passage, approval and publication of this Ordinance as provided by law. SECTION III. CERTIFICATION APD RECORDING. The CityClerk IS hereby a riz a irec ed to certify a copy of this Ordinance which shall be recorded at the Office of the County Recorder of Johnson County, Iwa, upon final passage and publi- cation as provided by law. SECTION IV. REPEALER. All ordinances and parts of o finances 1 con 1ct with the provisions of this Ordinance are hereby repealed. SECTION V. SEVERABILITY. If any section, provi- sion or part of this Ordinance shall be adjudged to be invalid or unconstitutional, such adjudication shall not affect the validity of the Ordinance as a whole or any section, provision or part thereof not adjudged invalid or unconstitutional. SECTION VI. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall be in effect after its dna passage, approval and publication as required by law. Passed and approved this MAYOR ATTEST: CITY CLEW d 37 N STAFF REPORT To: Planning & Zoning Commission Item: Z-8709. Boyrum/Olympic Property GENERAL INFORMATION Applicant: Requested action: Purpose: Location: Existing land use and zoning: Surrounding land use and zoning: Comprehensive Plan: File date: 45 -day limitation period: BACKGROUND Prepared by: Monica Moen Date: December 17, 1987 Southgate Development Co. 325 East Washington Street Iowa City, Iowa 52240 Contact: Mace Braverman Phone: (319) 337-4195 Rezoning from I-1 to CI -1. To permit use of the tract for offices. East of Boyrum Street and north of Olympic Court. Vacant buildings; I-1. North - Business and personal service establishments, office use, retail estab- lishments, club; CC -2. East - Food processing opera- tion, retail establish- ment; I-1 and CC -2. South - Undeveloped land and vacant building; CI -1. West - Restaurant and undevel- oped land; CI -1. Intensive Commercial. November 24, 1987. January 8, 1988. Southgate Development Company comes before the Commission with a request to rezone an L-shaped tract of land located east of Boyrum Street and north of Olympic Court (described in Attachment 2 and illustrated in Attachment 3) from the I -I, General Industrial zone to the CI -1, Intensive Commercial zone to allow conversion of existing buildings on the property for office use, a use not permitted in the I-1 zone. In particular, the applicant wishes to lease the property on a temporary basis (1-4 years) to National Computer Systems (NCS) to allow NCS to establish offices in this location. i In a letter (Attachment 4) to Mace Braverman, dated December 1, 1987, NCS states its intentions "...to relocate approximately 150 administrative, marketing, customer service, and software development people to these sites." NCS has verified that the software development aspect of its operations involves writing the computer software required to permit NCS to score and edit tests and to print materials, a procedure consistent with office use activities. ANALYSIS The short- and long-range development plans for the City indicate that the subject parcel is located in an area that is encouraged to develop for com- mercial purposes and, indeed, all of the surrounding areas are zoned for such uses. The short-range plan specifically notes that this area should be reserved for intensive commercial use and the zoning classification south and west of this tract reflects that type of zoning. This type of commercial use is typically not reliant upon high visibility, access to major thoroughfares or immediate proximity to the populations it serves in order to thrive. The I-1 zoning classification placed on the property under consideration reflects the land use that existed on the property at the time the zoning map was adopted and not the land use shown in the Comprehensive Plan to be most appropriate for this area. The tract does not possess the characteristics generally associated with industrial zones such as easy and immediate access to major thoroughfares and railways (which also serves to buffer the indus- trial development from adjacent land uses), and the provision of sufficient land area to allow the scale of development typical of industrial uses or to accommodate expansions. Instead, the subject tract of land possesses qualities that make it suitable for intensive commercial use, the land use recommended in the 1983 Comprehen- sive Plan Update. Rezoning the property from I-1 to CI -1 would allow devel- opment of the site for uses which are both compatible with adjacent uses and consistent with the development policy adopted by the City. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the property described in Attachment 2 to this report be rezoned from I-1, General Industrial, to CI -1, Intensive Commercial. ATTACHMENTS 1. Location map. 2. Legal descriptions of subject property. 3. Site plan. 4. Letter to Mace Braverman from NC dated December,l, Approved by: na c metser, tree or epartmen t of Planning and Program Development M I ATTACHMENT 1 LOCATION MAP BOYRUM/OLYMPIC PROPERTY I -I to CI -1 M. --M Emmmuffill �=10TMIsis I wall i! 17", 111 awn 'Via ATTACHMENT 2 The South 190 feet of a tract of land described as follows: the S.E. quarter of Section 15r township 79 North, Range 6 West of the 5th P.M. in Iowa City, Johnson County, Iowa: commencing at a point marked by an iron pin, which point is on the South line of said Section 15 and bears South 87 degrees 39 minutes West, 240.0 feet from the Southeast corner of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of said Section 15; thence South 87 degrees 39 minutes ^ West for a distance of 103.1 feet; thence North 0 degrees 17 minutes West ILv{ for a distance of 566.3 feet; thence South 69 degrees 48 minutes East for a distance of 110.0 feet along the Southerly line of Highway No. 6; thence South 0 degrees 17 minutes East for a distance of 524.0 feet to the point of beginning, containing an area of 56,172 square feet; together with an easement for driveway, road and access purposes (including but not limited by this reference to water, sewer, gas and electricity purposes) over, under and upon the East 18 feet of the Northerly 376.3 feet more or less of the above described larger tract from the Southerly line of said Highway 6 to the Northerly line of the South 190 feet of the larger tract above described. p o7 In Township 79 Nortn, Range o .,est of the 5th P.M., Section 15, S.W. 1/4 of Lie S.L. 1/4 tnereof, a tract of land described as f011ows: Beginning at a point on the west line of Lloyd's Sumdivision which lies S. 0 degrees 17 minutes 00 seconds East, 203.00 feet from the A.W. corner of Lot 2 of Lloyd's /Al Subdivision in Iowa City, Iowa, according to the plat recorded in Plat Book 7, page 25, Plat Records of ,;ohnson County, Iowa; thence south 0 degrees 17 minutes 00 seconds East, 3G3.30 feet; thence South d7 -degrees 29 minutes 40 seconds West, 166.00 feet; thence North 0 degrees 16 minutes 13 seconds Wiest, '369.75 feet; thence North 89 degrees 43 minutes 00 seconds East, 166.00 feet to the point of beginning. Said tract contains 1.40 acres more or less. The South 190 feet of a tract of land described as follows: the S.E. quarter of Section 15r township 79 North, Range 6 West of the 5th P.M. in Iowa City, Johnson County, Iowa: commencing at a point marked by an iron pin, which point is on the South line of said Section 15 and bears South 87 degrees 39 minutes West, 240.0 feet from the Southeast corner of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of said Section 15; thence South 87 degrees 39 minutes ^ West for a distance of 103.1 feet; thence North 0 degrees 17 minutes West ILv{ for a distance of 566.3 feet; thence South 69 degrees 48 minutes East for a distance of 110.0 feet along the Southerly line of Highway No. 6; thence South 0 degrees 17 minutes East for a distance of 524.0 feet to the point of beginning, containing an area of 56,172 square feet; together with an easement for driveway, road and access purposes (including but not limited by this reference to water, sewer, gas and electricity purposes) over, under and upon the East 18 feet of the Northerly 376.3 feet more or less of the above described larger tract from the Southerly line of said Highway 6 to the Northerly line of the South 190 feet of the larger tract above described. p o7 V Y>;rF GHtNb I v ATTACHMENT 3 I I rAl J.M. SWANK I MILAG. L I G02,Fl�2AT1 OLYMPIC A6G.S 7 Pt,�TWAY GOU IZ7 TSOUTHG, COMMERQIA :-.aLIF-- vIs10M 4 w ATTACHMENT 4 Post OHice Box 30. Iowa C.ty, !A 52244 / Phone 319.354.9200 NATIONAL COMPUTER lk SYSTEMS INFORMATION SERVICES December 1, 1987 Mr. Mace Braverman Southgate Development Company 325 East Washington Iowa City, IA 52240 Dear Mace: Per our previous discussions, it's important that work begin immediately on the Swank buildings while you and Tom Erickson work out the details of the lease arrangements. NCS intends to relocate approximately 150 administrative, marketing, customer service, and software development people to these sites. The space that they fill up in our main facility will be remodeled to be used for production space for the new federal business we recently were awarded. It would be best if all the work could be completed by the end of January, with the smaller building available for occupancy the week of December 21, 1987. Thank you for your assistance and support, /nek cc: Tom Erickson � Sincerely, l��l(j V,LC ul- V. M. Amundson Director, Administration L.L D 1987 RTMENT 37 NOTICE OF RJOLIC FEARING ON THE CERTIFICATION OF DELINQUENT HATER SERVICE ACCOUNTS, SEWER SERVICE ACCOFMTS, SOLID AM COLLECTION SERVICE ACOOTMS, AM WEED CUTTING ASSESSMENTS FOR COLLECTION AS TAXES. To Whom It May Concern: You and each of you are hereby notified that the City Ccuncil of the City of Iowa City will hold a public hearing on the proposed certification of delinquent water service accounts, sewer service accounts, solid waste collection service accounts, and weed cutting assessments to the Johnson Canty Treasurer for collection in the same manner as taxes. Said public hearing will be held by the City Council during its Fonral Meeting to be held at 1:30 p.m. on the 12th day of January, 1988, in the City Council Chambers in the Civic Center, 410 E. Wash- ington Street, Iowa City, Iowa, at which time and place all persons interested in said natters will be given an opportunity to be heard. MARIAN K. KARR, CITY CLEW X M City of Iowa City MEMORANDUM Date: January 6, 1988 To: City Council From: Nancy Heaton, City Treasurer Re: Request for Approval of liens for Delinquent Utility Charges Delinquent inactive utility account balances are listed as of September 30 by the Treasury Division of the Finance Department for certification to the Johnson County Auditor as liens against the property. Such liens are billed and collected with property taxes by the Johnson County Treasurer. This listing also includes delinquent active account balances for refuse charges which cannot be collected in the same manner as other active accounts through the shut-off procedure. All accounts being liened were in the owner's name for the billing period and there are no active accounts in the same name for purposes of transferring balances.. Accounts billed in tenant's names at rental properties are either transferred to a new account in the tenant's name or written off as uncollectible. Of the $10,333.00 on the September 30th delinquent listing, $3,871.69 was paid, $540.11 was transferred to active accounts, $4,242.09 was written off as uncollectible and $1,679.11 are on the list submitted for liens. The uncollectible amount is .087% of the FY87 receipt total of $4,860.189. This percentage reflects the effectiveness of the current billing and collection procedures. I am requesting that you approve the listing for certification to the Johnson County Auditor. All owners were notified by certified letters of the City's intention to file the lien and offered the opportunity to appear before the Council at the January 12th Council meeting. I will be at the Council meet- ing to answer any questions you might have. bc3 CITY CMC CENTER of 410 E. WASMGTON ST. IOWA CITY, TONNA 52240 23 -Dec -87 Dear Utility Customer: CITY (319) 356-50010 You are hereby notified that resolutions concerning unpaid water, sewer and/or refuse charges for services furnished to your property will be considered by the City Council of Iowa City, Iowa, on the 12th day of January, 1988, at 7:30 P.M. in the Council Chambers, Civic Center, 410 East Nashington Street, Iowa City, Johnson County, Iowa. The question before the City Council will be whether the delinquent amount stated above shall be assessed against your property and certified to the Auditor of Johnson County, Iowa, for collection in the same manner as a property tax pursuant to Sections 33-167, 33-46 and/or 15-6 of the City Code. According to City records, services as shown on the attached sheet were furnished to this service address. Payment has not been received to date. If payment is received prior to the date of the Council hearing, the account will be removed from the Council listing. Persons desiring to be heard on this matter should appear before the City Council at the time stated above. If you have any questions, please call 356-5065. Sincerely, Nancy Heaton City Treasurer SW/sp Enclosure M 1/12/88 001-916-00 Parcel #: 60323000 Address: R.R. 6, Box 37, Sand Rd. Owner: Lillian & Margaret Kuenster Legal Desc.: Gov. Lot 4 Sec. 22-79-6 Bldg. on leased Refuse $52.40 ground, land owned by Charlie Showers 001-922-00 Parcel #: 58583000 Address: 1610 Waterfront Dr. Owner: Dwayne & Louise D. Lewis Legal Oesc.: Beg. 137.4 E & 112' N of SW Cor. SEI/4 Refuse $52.40 Sec. 15-79-6 on East side of Road E 90' N 60'S 60' to Beg. 001-926-01 Parcel #: 56462000 Address: R.R. 6, Box 36 Owner: Al Graham Legal Desc.: Bldg. on leased ground, Showers Refuse $61.40 Property. 001-987-00 Parcel #: 62634000 Address: R.R. 6 Owner: Tony Tonda Legal Desc.: Gov. Lot 4 Sec. 22-79-6 Bldg. on leased Refuse $61.00 ground, land owned by Charlie Showers 001-996-00 Parcel #: 59502000 Address: R.R. 4, Box 49 Owner: Max Yocum Legal Desc.: Bldg. on leased ground located on Refuse $52.40 Showers Property. 001-997-01 Parcel #: 56536000 Address: R.R. 4, Box 6 Owner: Al Graham Legal Desc.: Gov. Lot 4 Sec. 22-79-6 Bldg, on leased Refuse $47.70 ground, land owned by Charlie Showers 003-205-03 Parcel #: 62024000 Address: 617 Johnson St. N Water $18.46 Owner: Anna Buss Roth, Mary Anne Buss, Contract to Sewer $15.90 Howard W. Dedman Refuse $25.80 Legal Desc.: Lot 1 Blk. 34 Original town of Iowa City Total $60.16 004-284-00 Parcel #: 56643001 Address: 1120 Governor St. N Water $31.76 Owner: Mary Beth & Charles Bringle Sewer $17.28 Legal Oesc.: Com at Intersection NE Cor Kimball Rd. Refuse $17.20 & N. Governor St. SE 81.25' to Beg to Beg NE 90.09 Total $66.24 to E line Lot 38 SO SEI/4 Sec. 3-79-6 SE 23.85' S 156.61' to SW Corner Lot 38 NW 149.35' to Beg. 008-490-02 Parcel #: 59082000 Address: 521 S. Gilbert St. Water $ 59.04 Owner: Wilson Close Ltd. Sewer $ 48.94 Legal Desc,: Lot 6 N 112' of Lot 7 Blk 5 Lyons Total 3T67 ?IS 1st Add. W 010-465-07 Parcel #: 56350000 Address: 517 Governor St. S Water $ 53.98 Owner: Contract - Barbara K. Nicknish Sewer $ 38.34 Legal Desc.: Lot 13 Blk. 1 Berryhills 2nd Add. Refuse $ 8.63 Total 3T60-45 F r� V 2 024-180-08 Parcel is 60992000 Address: 818 Van Buren St. S Water $40.71 Owner: Raymond Lothridge Sewer $15.91 Legal Oesc.: Lot 6 Blk. 1 Pages Add. Refuse $25.80 Total $82.42 024-240-04 Parcel 9: 62687000 Address: 927 Van Buren St. S Water $ 64.60 Owner: Gregory M. Neighbors Sewer $ 45.38 Legal Desc.: Lot 5 Blk. 1 Berryhills 1st Add. Refuse $ 17.20 Total TTZ7:T8 027-205-06 Parcel d: 56610000 Address: 1116 Keokuk St. Water $41.28 Owner: Jeffrey S. Harvey Sewer $18.00 Legal Desc.: Lot 3 Blk. 1 E W Lucas Add. Refuse $25.80 Total T9U7W 033-245-11 Parcel #: 58248000 Address: 1321 Hollywood Blvd. Water $23.92 Owner: Mid-America Savings Bank Sewer $20.52 Legal Desc.: Lot 40 Hollywood Manor Add. Part 1 Refuse $ 8.60 Total $53.04 036-050-07 Parcel 9: 60840000 Address: 1330 Kirkwood Ave. Water $ 9.10 Owner: J Properties, Contract Buyer Alvaro Rendon, Sewer $ 7.98 Jean Marie Rendon Refuse $ 8.60 Legal Desc.: Lot B Pesurvey of S.D. in NEI/4 Total $25.68 Sec. 14-79-6 073-050-02 Parcel d: 62173000 Address: 905 Harlocke St. Water $ 47.22 Owner: Olen Stidham, Forfeited Contract: Sewer $ 53.82 Buyer John Morrow Refuse $ 8.60 Legal Desc.: Lot 20 Weeber Third Add. Total $109.64 200-055-00 Parcel R: 53756000 Address: 414 Brown St. Water $127.18 Owner: Frances D. Black, Contract Buyer: Richard Sewer $221.07 & Toni Wayne Total T3d97E Legal Desc.: Iowa City Outlots r� J P October 1, 1987 - Delinquent Inactive Accounts Tenants 5,002.72 101.89 Transferred T�-9= Owners 5,330.28 - 13.50 Incorrect Refuse Y,-3T6�S - 424.72 Transferred 4,892.06 Total $10,333.00 - 540.11 Transferred —T,7M—. 1 - 5,921.20 outstanding 3,871.69 Paid To be liened 608.20 Water 24 Accts 581.08 Sewer 575.93 Refuse 1,765.21 - 86.10 Paid 1,679.11 - 185.19 Paid after Certified Letter 17 Accts 1,493.92 To be Liened J 001-916-00 Parcel I: 60323000 Address: R.R. 6, Box 37, Sand Rd. Owner: Lillian & Margaret Kuenster Legal Desc.: Gov. Lot 4 Sec. 22-79-6 Bldg. on leased Refuse $52.40 ground, land owned by Charlie Showers 001-922-00 Parcel is 58583000 Address: 1610 Waterfront Dr. Owner: Dwayne & Louise D. Lewis Legal Desc.; Beg. 137.4 E & 112' N of SW Cor. SEI/4 Refuse $52.40 Sec. 15-79;-6 on East side of Road E 90' N 60'S 60' to Beg. 001-926-01 Parcel 1: 564 2000 Address: R.R. 6, Box 36 Owner: Al Gra h m Legal Desc.; Bl g. on leased ground, Showers Refuse $61.40 Property. 001-987-00 Parcel 1: 62634000 Address: R.R. 6 Owner: Tony Tonda / Legal Desc.; Gov. Lo 4 Sec. 22-79-6 Bldq( on leased Refuse $61.00 ground, land owned b Charlie Showers 17 001-996-00 Parcel 1: 59502000 Add r ss: R.R. lox 49 Owner: Max Yocum Legal Desc.: Bldg. on leas d gro nd located on Refuse $52.40 Showers Property. 001-997-01 Parcel 1: 56536000 Addres . R.R. 4, Box 6 Owner; Al Graham Legal Desc.: Gov. Lot 4 ec. 2 79-6 Bldg, on leased Refuse $52.40 ground, land owned b Charlie howers 002-450-10 Parcel /: 637370eorggg00 Address: 800 Van Buren St. N Water $13.78 Legal BeSewer GAl thathpartoofaWI/2 lying N�oflaplineou sRefuse $18.60 220' St of N�Van Buren S N of the /L of Brown Total $34.32 003-205-03 Parcel 1; X024000 Address: 617 Jo nson St. N Water $18.46 Owner: An Buss Roth, Mary Anne Bus Contract to Sewer $15.90 Howard c Dedmon ` Refuse $25.80 Legal 0 sc.: Lot I Blk. 34 Original town of Iowa City Total $60.16 004-284-00 Parc 1: 56643001 Address: 1120 Governor St. N Water $31.76 Own r: Mary Beth & Charles Bringle Sewer $17.28 Le6al oesc.: Com at Intersection NE Cor Kimball Rd. Refuse $17.20 & N. Governor St. SE 81.25' to Beg to Beg NE 90.09 Total 66.24 to E line Lot 38 SD SE1/4 Sec. 3-79-6 SE123.85' S 156.61' to SW Corner Lot 38 NW 149.35' to Beg. 008-490-02 Parcel 1: 59082000 Address: 521 S. Gilbert St. Water $ 59.04 owner: Wilson Close Ltd. Sewer $ 48.94 Legal Desc.: Lot 6 N 1/2' of Lot 7 Blk 5 Lyons Total $107.98 1st Add. 4U 2 010-465-07 Parcel l: 56350000 Address: 517 Governor St. S Owner: Contract - Barbara K. Nicknish Legal Desc.: Lot 13 Blk. 1 Berryhills 2nd Add. 024-180-08 Parcel /: 60992000 Address: 818 Van Buren St. S Owner: Raymond Lothridge Legal Desc.: Lot 6 Blk. 1 Pages Add. 024-240-04 027-205-06 Parce Owner Legal Water $ 53.98 Sewer $ 38.34 Refuse $ 8.63 Total $100.95 Water $40.71 Sewer $15.91 Refuse $25,80 Total 3gP 47 A: 62687000 Address: 927 Van Buren St. S Water $ 64.60 Gregory M. Neighbors Sewer ,$ 45.38 Desc.: Lot 5 Blk. 1 Berryhills lst Add. Refuse '$ 17.20 Legal Desc.: Lot 40 )Hollywood Manor Add. Part 1 Total $127.18 \C: 56610000 Address: 1116 Keokuk St. -'Water $41.28 Jeffrey S. Harvey Sewer $18.00 Des 4.: Lot 3 Blk. 1 E W Lucas Add. / Refuse $25.80 \ Jean Marie Rendon / Total $g5Z0g 033-210-11 Parcel 0: 5 Owner: Geor Legal Desc.: 101 Address: 1107 Hollywood Blvd. torr Sewer $ 8.48 lywood Manor Add. Part;l Refuse $17.20 Total $25.68 033-245-11 Parcel 8: 58248000\ Address: 1321 Hollywood Blvd. Water $23.92 Owner: Mid-America Savings Bank/ Sewer $20.52 Legal Desc.: Lot 40 )Hollywood Manor Add. Part 1 Refuse $ 8.60 Total $53.04 036-050-07 Parcel 9: 60840000 A\s: 1330 Kirkwood Ave. Water $ 9.10 Owner: J Properties, CoOtYact Buyer Alvaro Rendon, Sewer $ 7.98 Jean Marie Rendon / Refuse $ 8.60 Legal Desc.: Lot B PRsurvey of S.D. in NE1/4 Total $25.68 Sec. 14-79-6 7 050-255-02 Parcel 1r: 576940p0 Address; 0 Glendale Ct. Water $ 7.49 Owner: Nancy H� per & Frederic . Carter Sewer $ 9.50 Legal Desc.: L t 31 West Bel -Air 2nd Add. Refuse $ 9.00 Total $25.99 055-365-01 Parcel p: 9420000 Address: 1024 urlington St. E Water ' $10.10 Owner: De ert & Lucille Miller Sewer $41.40 .: Contract forfeited by K n Knipfer Le/er Refuse $43.00 Total $94.50 073-050-02 Pa62173000 Address: 905 Harl\ ke St. Water $ 47.22 Owen Stidham, Forfeited Contract:\, Sewer S 53.82 hn Morrow Refuse $ 8.60 Le.: Lot 20 Weeber Third Add. Total '$109. 64 200-055-00 Parcel R: 53756000 Address: 414 Brown St. Water $127.18 Owner: Frances D. Black, Contract Buyer: Richard Sewer $221.07 & Toni Wayne Total $348.25 b Legal Desc.: Iowa City Outlots