HomeMy WebLinkAbout1989-09-19 Ordinance■
ORDINANCE NO. 89-3431
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND CHAPTER 36, ZONING OR.
DINANCE, TO PERMIT FENCES UP TO SIX FEET IN HEIGHT
WITHIN A FRONT YARD ABUTTING AN ARTERIAL STREET.
WHEREAS, residential properties along expressways and
arterial streets must tolerate a certain amount of noise dust,
glare and other negative effects of high traffic volume; and
WHEREAS, residential property owners on double frontage
lots are affected by traffic on both ends of their lots; and
WHEREAS, these property owners should be able to
ameliorate some of these negative effects by erecting a fence
between their residence and the high traffic volume street; and
WHEREAS, A six foot fence along an expressway or arterial
street will not obstruct visibility, or Impede the flow of traffic or
access to the right-ofway,
NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CfrY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF IOWA CITY, IOWA:
SECTION I. AMENDMENT. That subsection 36b5(a)(4) is
hereby deleted and the following Is Inserted In lieu thereof:
(4) In R zones or within 50 feet of an R zone along the
same frontage, fences within the front yard shall not
exceed four (4) feet In height. Fences may be
constructed within a front yard abutting an express.
way or arterial street, as listed or defined In the
Comprehensive Plan, to a height not exceeding six
(6) feet when:
a. The front yard Is within a double
frontage lot, or
b. The front yard Is within a corner lot
and abuts the front yard of a
double frontage lot.
SECTION II. REPEALER: All ordinances and parts of ordinan.
ces In co RIM with the provisions of this ordinance are hereby
repealed.
SECTION III. SEVERABILITY: If any section, provision or part
of the Ordinance shall be adjudged to be Invalid or unconst8u.
tional, such adjudication shall not affect the validity of the
Ordinance as a whole or any section, provision or part thereof
not adjudged Invalid or unconstitutional.
SECTION IV. EFFECTIVE DATE: This Ordinance shall be In
effect affer Its Mal passage, approval and publication as
required by law.
P ed and approved this 19th day of September,
19 ^
YOR
ATTEST:�Q�._� ..J
CITY CLERK
Approved as to Form
/✓JS 9/r/Cf
Legal Department
G
I
II�
i
II�
I'
G
'
{twas moved byBalmer odseconded by that
the0rdYnunceas dupon roll call Chere were:
AYES: NAYS: ABSENT:
Amhrisco
Balmer
------ -------Courtney
xHorowitz
' .�}[—_ ^----- .�~----Kubbv
^—lL—_ ------ ^------Larsnn
. --2[.~. ---�~~ ----�—~McDonald
First Consideration ^------
Votefnrpassuge:
�
�econd�un�ide
` —
Vote for Ayes: McDonald, Anbrisco,Balmer,
Courtney, Onronitz,Kohby^ Mays: Nome. Absent: None.
'
ORDINANCE NO. 89-3432
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO
PERMIT AN INCREASE IN BUILDING HEIGHT AND FLOOR
AREA RATIO IN THE COMMERCIAL OFFICE, CO -1, ZONE.
WHEREAS, buildings In the CO -1 zone are not permitted to
exceed 25 feet In height nor a floor area ratio (FAR) of one
(1); and
WHEREAS, this height limitation and FAR were Intended to
assure that in those Instances where commercial office uses
were located next to residential areas, the scale of the build -
Ings In the CO -1 zone would be compatible with the scale of
residential buildings; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that it Is in the
Interest of the community to permit buildings taller than 25 feet
In the CO -1 zones to foster higher Intensity office develop-
ments In areas that are not adjacent to low density residential
zones.
NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF IOWA CITY, IOWA:
SECTION I. That Chapter 36, 'Zoning Ordinance' of the Code
of Ordinances of the City of Iowa City, Iowa, is hereby
amended by adding thereto the following section:
Section 36.17(8)(3). Buildings on lots that are across the
street from RM, C or I Zones may be Increased in height
according to the provisions of Section 36.70(b) except than an
additional front yard setback need not be provided. (The
additional side and rear yard setbacks shall appy.) However,
the minimum separation between the building and the from lot
line of the lot across the street shall be two (2) feet for each
one (1) foot of height In addition, the floor area ratio (FAR)
may be Increased to three (3)..
SECTION II. REPEALER: All ordinances and pans of ordinan-
ces in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance are hereby
repealed.
SECTION 111. SEVERABILITY: If any section, provision or pan
of the Ordinance shall be adjudged to be Invalid or unconstitu.
tional, such adjudication shall not affect the validity of the
Ordinance as a whole or any section, provision or pan thereof
not adjudged Invalid or unconstitutional.
SECTION IV. EFFECTIVE DATE: This Ordinance shall be in
effect after its final passage, approval and publication as
required by law.
Passed and approved this 19th day of September,
19
ATTEST: 2(. gym)
CITY CLERK
fv_A6
Apr ed est ,rm ,
FAO/8t
Legal Department
16do
I� 1
ii
I
i
i
I. it
1
I
�i
1
i
I
It was moved byAmbrisc0 and seconded by Balmer that
the Ordinance as rea e a opte , and upon roll call there were:
AYES: NAYS: ABSENT:
X
Ambrisco
g
Balmer
X
Courtney
X
Horowitz
X
Kubby
X
Larson
g
McDonald
First Consideration -------
Vote for passage:
Second Consideration 9/5/89
Vote for passage: Ayes: Ambrisco, Balmer, Courtney, Horowitz,
Kubby, Larson, McDonald. Nays: None. Absent: None.
Date published 9/27/89
Moved by Balmer, seconded by Ambrisco, that the rule requiring
ordinances to be considered and voted on for passage at two
Council meetings prior to the meeting at which it is to be
r finally passed be suspended, the first consideration be waived
and the ordinance to given second consideration at this time:
Ayes: McDonald, Ambrisco, Balmer, Courtney, Horowitz, Kubby,
Larson. Nays: None. Absent: None.
j
j
i
i
i
i
r
1_
I
ORDINANCE NO. 89-3433
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO
CLARIFY THE RULES OF CONSTRUCTION FOR
BOUNDARIES OF ZONES.
WHEREAS, the present Zoning Ordinance states that where
uncertainty exists as to the locations of zone boundaries
shown on the zoning map, the boundaries of zones along
streets shall be at the center line of streets; and
WHEREAS, it was the Intent of the ordinance that the zone
boundaries along streets would In all cases fall along the
center line of the streets.
NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF IOWA CITY, IOWA:
SECTION I. That Chapter 36, 'Zoning Ordinance' of the Code
of Ordinances of the City of Iowa City, Iowa, is hereby
amended by deleting Section 36-67(a) and Inserting In lieu
thereof:
Section 36-67(a). The boundaries of various zones shall
be as shown on the zoning map accompanying and made a
pan of this Chapter, except as otherwise Indicated in the
following rules:
(1) Where the boundaries of the zones are along streets
and alleys, they shall be construed to be along the
tamer lines of such streets and alleys.
(2) Where the boundaries of the zones are not otherwise
Indicated, and where the property has been or may
hereafter be divided Into blocks and lots, the bound•
atlas of the zones shall be construed to be the lot
lines and where the zones designated on the zoning
map accompanying and made a part of this Chapter
are bounded approximately by lot lines, the lot lines
shall be construed to be the boundaries of the zones
unless the boundaries are otherwise indicated on the
map.
(3) In separate tracts not subdivided and In unsubdNlded
Property, the zoning boundary lines on the map
accompanying and made a part of this Chapter shall
be determined by use of the scale appearing on the
map.
SECTION ll. REPEALER: All Ordinances and parts of ordinan.
ces In conflict with the provisions of this ordinance are hereby
repealed.
SECTION III. SEVERABILITY: If any section, provision or part
of the Ordinance shall be adjudged to be Invalid or unconsthu•
tlonal, such adjudication shall not affect the validity of the
Ordinance as a whole or any sectlon, provision or part thereof
not adjudged Invalid or unconstitutional.
SECTION IV. EFFECTNE DATE: This Ordinance shall be In
effect atter its final passage, approval and publication as
required by law.
Pd and approved this 19th day of September,
1 9.
L
AYOR �
ATTEST:�/T w w,.r)
CITY C K
Ap r ed rm
Legal Department
e
It was moved by Horowitz and seconded by Ambrisco that
the Ordinance as read e adopted, and upon roll call there were:
AYES: NAYS: ABSENT:
X Ambrisco
K Balmer
X Courtney
x Horowitz
x Kubby
_ x Larson
x McDonald
First Consideration --
Vote for passage:
Second Consideration 9/5/89
Vote for passage: Ayes: Courtney, Horowitz, Kubby, Larson,
McDonald, Ambrisco, Balmer. Nays: None. Absent: ?gone. .
' Date published 9/27/89
Moved by Balmer, seconded by Ambrisco, that the rule requiring
ordinances to be considered and voted on for passage at two
Council meetings prior to the meeting at which it is to be
} finally passed be suspended, the first consideration be waived
a and the ordinance be given second consideration at this time.
Ayes: Balmer, Courtney, Horowitz, Kubby, Larson, McDonald,
Ambrisco. Nays: None. Absent: None.
, ,
r