HomeMy WebLinkAbout1987-01-13 Info PacketCITY OF IOWA CITY
CIVIC CENTER 410 E. WASHNGTON Si. IOWA CITY, IOWA 52240 (319) 356-5000
January 7, 1987
Ms. Dorothy Schottelius, City Councilor
City of University Heights
1450 Grand Avenue
Iowa City, IA 52240
Re: FAUS Funds - Sunset/Benton Signalization
v �.y
Dear Ms. Schottelius:
55�
-1
I am pleased to hear that University Heights has tentatively concurred in
xi:>F
contributing a two-year borrow ahead of FAUS funds "entitled" to your
r,•.;=
community to the Benton Street Bridge Reconstruction Project. I agree
with JCCOG's assessment that this is the most efficient use of the funds,
and feel it is a project which will benefit your community.
v+r!
With your cooperation in this matter, the City of Iowa City is now pre-
"°
pared to fund the total expense involved in the signalization of the
Benton Street/Sunset Street intersection. As I believe you have been
informed by Jim Brachtel and Jeff Davidson, there are several items which
need to be resolved before this project can actually be implemented. These
include utility relocation, possible reconstruction of part of the inter-
'
section, and acquisition of signal hardware.
The Iowa City City Council has given their approval of this project as
part of our FY87 Capital Improvements Program, and it is presently pro-
y !
grammed for implementation in FY88.
Please feel free to contact Jeff Davidson at 356-5252 if we can be of any
?
further assistance in this matter.
Q4+'
Sincerely yours,
s'
lP
teph A kins
City ager
cc: City Council
Chuck Schmadeke
Jim Brachtel
Jeff Davidson
/sp
55�
-1
City of Iowa City
MEMORANDUM
Date: January 7, 1987
To: City Council
From: Dale Helling, Assistant City
Re: Use of Pesticides in the City
The sale, distribution and application of pesticides in the State of Iowa is
regulated by Chapter 206 of the Code of Iowa,
is the statutory authority for enforcement of theeproy{sions of Chaptert206
and violations are reported to that office on the designated forms.
Chapter 206 provides, in part, that all dealers and commercial applicators of
Pesticides shall be licensed and certified by the Secretary of Agriculture
and that all applications shall be
of the manufacturer, Violations ofptheprovisions stent with of Chapter h206nrangetfrom
a simple misdemeanor to a serious misdemeanor. Offenses which are regulated
through local legislation can only be designated as simple misdemeanors.
hIn the past several years the City has received a limited number of com-
avenbeenereferredtto the Departmeuse and/or nt tAgriculture. When Mr.
complained pesticides and complainants
I personally contacted the Department of Agricultureggandfire-
quested that they contact Mr. Ye
then, nor does it now have, adequate staff witwhich h sufficient did. The Ctraidid ningnin this
area to effectively determine whether or not a violation of Chapter 206 has
occurred and to substantiate a criminal charge to that effect. Local legis.
lation and enforcement would represent an expansion into a new service area
and would require additional staff time and training in order to accomplish
this end. It would also duplicate a service now provided by the Department
of Agriculture.
The attached correspondence from 1985 includes a letter from the Cit
to the Executive Director of the Department of Water, Air and Waste Manage-
ment and a reply from the Supervisor of the Pesticide Section of the Depart-
ment of Agriculture indicating the desire of that department to be notified
In the event of any misuse of pesticides or allegations to that effect, Also
attached is a copy of a letter which was sent by the City Manager to seven
commercial applicators of pesticides known to be working in the City of Iowa
City, This letter will be updated and again sent out in the spring of 1987.
In the past the City has not taken steps to legislate additional regulations
or enforce the State Code at the local level. Please let me know if you have
questions or wish additional information regarding this matter.
tp5/1
Manager
54
CITY OF
IOWA
CITY
CMCCENER 410E.WA%JNGT0NSi. IOWA
CTfY, IOWA 52240 (319) 356-5000
May a, 1985
Mr. Stephen W. Ballou, Ph.D.
Executive Director
Iowa Department of Water, Air and Waste Management
Henry A. Wallace Building
9D0 East Grand
Des Moines, Iowa 50319
Dear Dr. Ballou:
A number of Iowa City residents have expressed concern about
the growing use of lawn service companies and their employees'
handling of the liquid weed killers and insecticides. .Incidents
mentioned were goldfish dying when a window was left open during
the spraying of a neighbor's yard, a resident becoming dizzy and
having headaches when several companies were spraying at the same
time in one neighborhood, and spray being applied during windy
weather. Concern also has been expressed for the employees of the
lawn services when they wear no protective clothing during the
application of the spray.
Would you please advise what guidelines your department imposes
on lawn services and the handling of weed killers and insecticides
and how these regulations are enforced.
Thank you for your cooperation.
Sincerely yours,
Neal
�
.—
Neal G. Berlin
City Manager
Is
cc: Ms. Louise F. Eichler
1532 California Avenue
Iowa City, Iowa 52240
City Clerk
R. H. LOUNSSERRY
SECRETARY Of AGRICULTURE
July 2, 1985
Mr. Neal Berlin
City Manager
City of Iowa City
410 East Washington
Iowa City, IA 52240
Dear Mr. Berlin,
RECEIVED JUL 3 1985
30tua 3tpartmtnt of 21griculturt
HENRY A. WALLACE BUILDING
DES MOINES. IOWA 50319
THATCHER JOHNSON
DEPUTY SECACLRY OE Al"CILTURE
Your letter to Dr. Steven W. Ballou of the Department of Water, Air and Waste
Management has been forwarded to me for reply.
I am very much Interested In receiving any reports of the misuse of herbicides and
insecticides by those Individuals in the business of applying pesticides to lawns or other
urban areas. The state Pesticide Act Chapter 206 of the Code of Iowa states that "it
shell be unlawful for any pesticide to be used contrary to its labeling." Applicators are
required by law to wear protective equipment as required by the label and also to follow
all precautions and use directions contained on the label for the pesticide being applied.
For instance, most labels for herbicides used on lawns contain warning statements "Do
not allow to drift to nontarget areas or sensitive crops or plants." It an applicator
allowed drift to nontarget areas in this case, it would be In violation of Chapter 206.
All commercial lawn service companies applying pesticides are required to be licensed
with the Department as well as having at least one person certified. The certification
process Is achieved by passing an examination relevant to the types of pesticide any
individual uses in his commercial application business. Those employees who are not
certified are required to operate under the direct supervision of a certified applicator.
Please feel free to contact me personally at (515) 281-5890 if you have specific
complaints related to the misuse of pesticides in your city. I hope this Information has
been helpful to you.
Sincerely,
A A(
Charles A. Eckermann
Supervisor
Pesticide Section
CAE/sr
PST/pc-1436
54
CITY OF IOWACMC� CITY
NEER 410 E. WAST NGTON Si. IOWA Cny, IOWA 52240 (319)356-500C)
July 5, 1985
This letter is being mailed to all lawn care companies who work within the
City of Iowa City. Citizens have been expressing concern to the City
about the manner in which liquid fertilizers/herbicides/insecticides are
applibeinged to appli da when theewindovelocity causesmritof the driiftttolainsrnon-ta getelate tothe liuid
areasgand
about the fact that many of the personnel do not wear protective equip-
ment.
A letter from the Iowa Department of Agriculture is attached which states
that these practices are in violation of the State Pesticide Act, Chapter
206 of the Code of Iowa. It obviously is imperative that the State
regulations be followed. If the City continues to receive complaints, the
Department of Agriculture will be notified.
Your cooperation will be appreciated.
�Sincerely yours,
Neal G. Berlin
City Manager
/sp
U64
41
SOUTHEAST IOWA
IOWA MUNICIPAL LEAGUE
MUNiciPa�.•_
SOUTHEAST
AG of
BOX 578 • CENTERVILLE, IOWA 52544
ATTENTION: ALL CITY OFFICALS IN SOUTHEAST IOWA
•PRESIDENT •
The first meeting Of 1987 for the Southeast Iowa
Wednesday,
C. A. WILLIAMS' JR.
Municipal League will be held in Washington on
Mayor of New London
January 14,1987.
• VICE PRESIDENT
MMayHAE
Captain' s Table (Located Just west of downtown
o fCoralvlCNlltE
WHERE: The
on Highway U92)
Washington
• DIRECrORS •
PHIL PALMER
Councilman, Grinnell
SOCIAL HOUR: 5:30 P.M.
LEROY PETERSON
Councilman, Oskaloosa
BUFFETT DINNER: 6:30 P.M. (Cost - $8-50)
MayorDICK WALTmAN
Mayor of Muscarine
PROGRAM: 7:30 P.M. is most
the meeting
JERRY RIODON
With the legislature convening,
for Municipal Officers. Bob Hties,
Councilman, Burlinflon
timely and meaningful
6f the League of Iowa Municipalities,
• IMMEDIATE PAST PRESIDENT •
Executive Director
update egislative issues relating to
on l
ROBERT L.RASMUSSEN
Moyor ofFalr eld
will ive an
itiesupdatedplan to
• SECRETARY -TREASURER
MARTIN E. GAMES All City Officals in the following counties are eligible)
Centerville Clerk'for membership: Appanoose, Davis, Des Moines, Henry,Monroe,
Jefferson, Johnson, Keokuk, Lee, Louisas Lucas, 14Washin Marion,
Muscatine, Poweahiek, Scott, Van Buren, Wapello, Washington, and Wayne.
pal
gue in
If your City was IIOt oinsmber of the us for thisSinformativeoutheast wmeeting iand toaconsider
1986, you are urged to j reasonalbe as f, Population under
membership in 1987. The"dues are very _
9,999 - $25.00; 1,0,000to 1199999 $1$40000. 35,000 and2,000 to 9over$20$075,Op-000 to
Enclosed for your information is a list of 1986 member cities and associate
members. ME
YOU DOWELCO
ELECTEDNOR HAVE TO BAAPPOINTED, TOMCOME RAND SHAREDANWINFORMATIVE LFEW IHOURS'
TY ICALS,
Sincerely,
mai
Martin E. Games
Secretary/Treasurer
or
To facilitate planning, please fill out arovided I la(mealocount.
January 12th, your reservations to help p
Send Reservations To: City City of Washington
516
Washington, Iowa 52513
Phone: 319-653-6584
Name of Member and Number of Reservations
57
ra+,a
WNLHUDSOKASSES50R
DENNI5U.UA RIDGE DEPUTY
OFFICE OF
Iowa citp
UP zfgazor
Johnson County Administration Building
P.O. Box 1350
IOWA CITY. IA 52244
January 8, 1987
GROLYNR. SURNEDEPUTY
Dear Conference Board Member;
Just a note to tell you that the Iowa City Conference Board has
scheduled a meeting for Monday January 26, 1987 at 7:00 P.M. at the
Iowa City Civic Center. Complete information will be forthcoming the
week before the meeting.
If you have any questions, please feel free to call me. The new
Phone number at the Assessor's Office is 356-6066.
Sincerely,
Dan L Hudson
Clerk, Iowa City Conference Board
�p
City of Iowa City
MEMORANDUM
Date: December 22, 1986
To: City Manager and City Council
From: Nancy Heaton, City Treasurer `77 hG
Re: FY86 Actuarial Study for Police and Fire Retirement Systems
The actuarial study completed by Steve Griffith of Taylor Ballard 8 Co. in
Cedar Rapids is attached.
This study is done in confirmation with Chapter 411.5.14 of the Iowa Code to
determine the assets and liabilities of the systems, the level of funding in
the system and the contributions to be made by the City in the next fiscal
year. The City's contribution is a percentage of each active member's base
salary plus longevity pay,
For your review, the historical
follows: contributions for the City have been as
Year Police
Fire
1976 24,04 26,95
1977 24.04
1978 22,11 26.95
1979 26,46 27,73
33.11
1980 25.32
198123,623 30.66
1982 30.273
23.654
31.004
1983 23.986
1984 23.209 31.320
1985 21,019 31.862
1986 17,686 32.088
1987 17.519 29.535
30.724
Some factors which contribute to the annual contribution and explain the
difference in the contribution level are:
I. Age and salaries of the members. The average age of police members on
June 30 was 36.48 and for fire members was 40,167.
2. The number of disability retirements. There are four disability retirees
on the police system and nine on the fire system.
3. Number of years as a member of the system. The police members average
9.463 and the fire members 13.104 years.
-7
page 2
4. Past funding of the systems. Although both systems are sound, ththis is
e police
system due tothehas
ben
highernrateed toftt rnoverlevel
created by resignationtoffunvested
f disability retirements of police
members and by the fewer number o
members.
ecurities can substantially reduce the funding the City
Interest income from s
must contridramatbutethroion io thex1986ypercentaginterest
forthe Ci�r
City's contribution.
/sp
:i
a
rqi
,'1
N:I
i.
is I
i
4)
i.:
�J
TAYLOR, BALLARD AND COMPANY
CONSULTING ACTUARIES
200 FIFTH AVENUE SOUTHEAST, P.O. BOX 1 365
CEDAR RAPIDS, IOWA 52406
ROBERT H. TAYLOR
JOHN O. BALLARD
STEVE GRIFFITH
LARRY J. DOZE
TELEPHONE (319) 398.1880
September 18, 1986
Ms. Nancy Heaton
City Treasurer
Iowa City Treasurers Office
410 East Washington
Iowa City, Iowa 52240
Dear Nancy,
Enclosed is a copy of the 1986 Actuarial Valuation of the Iowa City
Police and Fire Retirement systems.
As you can see, the city's share of contributions -- 17.519% for
the police department and 30.724% for the fire department -- are
near last year's levels. Normally, investment gains would have
reduced these amounts, but we had serious actuarial losses due to
two early fire department disabilities and one in the police
department.
Note that I have provided all of the auditors' information,
including the information required for the NGCA certification, in
the report.
If you or the Board have any questions, feel free to call.
Sincerely,
Ste th
mg
Enclosure
ka
TAYLOR, BALLARD & CO.
IOWA CITY POLICE AND FIRE DEPARTMENT
RETIREMENT AND PENSION SYSTEMS
Actuarial Reports
06/30/86
Prepared by:
Steve r f , Enroled Actuary
TAYL01, D AND COMPANY
IOWA CITY POLICE ANO FIRE DEPARTMENT
RETIREMENT AND PENSION SYSTEMS
Actuarial Report
06/30/86
Summary of Assumptions
I• Benefit Values
A. Normal Retirement Age
B. Normal Retirement Pension
C. Ordinary Death Benefit
D. Accidental Death Benefit
Later of age 55 and 22 years of service, but
not later than age 65.
50% of 3 -year final average monthly compen-
sation on a joint and 50% survivor basis
(minimum of .175 per month of the surviving
beneficiary), adjusted semi-annually for
one-half of the active salary scale
increase. (No explicit provision for
children's allowances.)
1) Pension to surviving beneficary equal to
25% of final average monthly compensation
- 10% of ordinary death claims.
2) Lump sum benefit equal to50% of final
compensation - 90% of ordinary death
claims.
1) Monthly pension to the surviving beneficiary
equal to 50% of final average compensation
- 90% of accidental death claims.
2) Lump sum benefit equal to 50% of final
compensation - 10% of accidental death
claims.
E. Ordinary Disability Benefit Monthly pension on a joint and 50% survivor
basis, equal to 40% of final average compen-
sation - 25% if less than 5 years of service.
F. Accidental Disability Benefit Monthly pension on a joint and 50% basi
equal to twothirds of final average s
compensation.
II. Assumed Group Characteristics
A. Active Lives
B. Retired Lives
C. Children
Surviving beneficiary assumed to be one year
Younger than the member.
Valued based on individual situations. Married
member assume spouse one year younger than
the member.
Benefits assumed payable to age 18, only.
57
V
Iowa City Police and Fire Department
Retirement and Pension Systems 06/30/86
Summary of Assumptions
Page 2
III. Valuation Assumptions
A. Interest 61 per year, compounded annually.
B. Mortality
1
Pre -Retirement Ordinary 1969-71 United States Lives Census Table -
total population.
2. Pre -Retirement Accidental 150% of the 1959 Accidental Death Benefits
Table.
3. Post -Retirement Male UP -1984 Table Set Forward 1 year
(Disability Lives Set Forward 6 years).
4. Post -Retirement Female UP -1984 Table Set Back 4 years.
C. Disability
1. Ordinary
2. Accidental
U. Withdrawals
E. Salary Increases
F. Annual Pension Increases
80% of the 1952 Disability Study
(Benefit 1 - Period 2).
120% of the 1952 Disability Study
(Benefit 1 - Period 2)
3% at employment, grading down to o%
after 15 years of service.
4% per year.
2% per year (one-half of the salary
scale increase).
IOWA CITY POLICE AND FIRE DEPARTMENT
RETIREMENT AND PENSION SYSTEMS
Actuarial Report
06/30/86
Development of Normal Cost
I. Police Department Retirement System - Section 411
A. Summary of Liabilities
1.
Pension Accumulation Fund
a. Service Retirement Allowances
$ 4,849,714
b. Ordinary Death Benefits
269,200
c. Accidental Death Benefits
84,040
d. Ordinary Disability Benefits
415,596
e. Accidental Disability Benefits
1.046 840
Total Pension Accumulation
2.
Pension Reserve Fund*
2,074,364
3.
Annuity Reserve Fund
42,911
4.
Expense Fund
0
Total Liabilities
8,/82,655
*-includes Children's Benefits ($854 police)
B. City
Contribution Rate
1.
Total Retirement System Liabilities
$ 8,782,665
2.
Present Assets
(4,941,726)
3.
Present Value of State Contributions at 2.652%
437,721)
4.
Present Value of 3.1% Member Contributions
511 665
5.
City's. Share of Future Liabilities
6.
Present Value of Future Compensation
16,505335
7.
City Contribution Rate [(5)/(6)]
— 17.519%
C. Comparison of Assets to Accrued Liabilities
1.
Present Value of Vested Pensions
a. Active
$ 1,408,355
b. Retired
2,117,275
c. Total
3,525,630
2.
Present Value of Nonvested Accrued Pensions
533,857
3.
Total Present Value of Accrued Pensions
4,059,487
4.
Present Assets
4,914,726
5.
Excess Assets
$ 855,239
U
Ki
r�
Iowa City Police and Fire Department
Retirement and Pension Systems 06/30/86
Development of Normal Cost
Page 2
I. D. NGCA Report Information
1. Balance Sheet Entries MIME 84 06 30 85 06/30/86
Assets 3,606,123 4,341,241 4,941,726
PV of prof bens to retirants 1,742,930 1,736,659 2,117,725
PV of prof bens to term vested 0
PV of proj hens to actives2,453,004 2 403 798 ,,582
Total PV 2 939
3,837,297 ,1� 6;728 5,057,307
Unfunded PV �540 605� 134 659 (115,581)
Net Fund Balance 3,606 123 2 _(_,_ )
,3 1,2 1 4,941,72-6
2. Member Counts
Retirants 18 16
Terminated Vested 0 16
Active - Vested 11 0 0
Nonvested 12 14
Total 9 44 40
72 70
3. Actuarial Values and Changes
PV of proj bens to 016/30/84 06/30/85 06/30/86
retirants $1,698,8600 1404% $1,693,889 129% $2,117,725 161%
Terminated -vested 0 0
Total 1,698,860 � 1,693,889 129% $2,117,525 161%
PV of proj bens to
actives 2,403,798 204% 2,739,241 208% 2,939,582 224%
Total PV proj ben $4,102,658 348% $4,433,130 337% $5,057,307 385%
Change from
1984/85/86 315,976 330,472 624,177
4. Comparative Summaries
1982 1983 1984 1985 1986
Assets 2,414,534 3,020,820 3,606,123 4,341,241 4,941,726
PV Benefit 3,433,790 3,837,297 4,146,728 4,475,900 5,057,307
Unfund PV (1,019,256) (816,477) (540, 05) (134,659) (115,581)
%Payroll 1,034,841 1,132,623 1,176,267 1,313,946 1,311,571
98% 72% 46% 10% 9%
a
�1
l�
Iowa City Police and Fire Department
Retirement and Pension Systems 06/30/85
Development -of Normal Cost
Page 3
II. Fire Department Retirement System - Section 411
A. Summary of Liabilities
1. Pension Accumulation Fund
a. Service Retirement Allowances
b.
Ordinary Death Benefits
$ 4,835,698
C. Accidental Death Benefits
223,746
d• Ordinary Disability Benefits
61,529
e• Accidental Disability Benefits
336,210
Total Pension Accumulation844
2. Pension Reserve Fund*
473
$ .6 301 b56
3. Annuity Reserve Fund
3,805,752
4. Expense Fund
48,635
Total Liabilities
0
10,156,0
*-includes Children's benefits ($6,314 fire)
3
B. City Contribution Rate
1. Total Retirement System Liabilities
2• Present Assets
$10,156,043
3. Present Value of State Contributions at 3.657%
4. Present Value of 3.1% Member
599
(5444,545)
Contributions
5. City's Share of Future Liabilities
6.
376 836
Present Value of Future Compensation
7. City Contribution Rate [(5)/(6)j
b 3,734,920
12.156,015
C. Comparison of Assets to Accrued Liabilities
36.724%
I. Present Value of Vested Pensions
a. Active .
b• Retired
$ 1,870,019
C. Total3
854 387
2• Present Value of Nonvested Accrued Pensions
3. Total Present Value
t /�4 40
611,902
of Accrued Pensions
4• Present Assets
—
6,336,308
5. Excess Assets
5599 742
7T 36;566
157
■
Iowa City Police and Fire Department
ketirement and Pension Systems 06/31/86
Development -of Normal Cost
Page 4
II. 0. NGCA Report Information
1. Balance Sheet Entries 06 30 84 06/30/85 06/30/86
Assets 4,048,176 4,902,528 5,599,742
PV of proj bens to retirants 2,928,685 2,951,651 3,854,381
PV of proj bens to term vested 0 0 0
PV of proj bens to actives 3.184,115 3,601,475 3,439,320
Total PV G,112,600 6,553,126 7,293,707
Unfunded PV 2 064 624 1 650 598 1 693 965
Net Fund Balance ,048,176 4,902,528 5,599,742
2. member Counts
Retirants 30 30 27
Terminated Vested 0 0 0
Active - Vested 17 23 19
Nonvested 33 27 P9
Total 80 80 T5
3. Actuarial Values and Changes
PV of proj bens to .06/30/84 06/30/85 06/30/86
retirants $2,879,082 257% $2,903,349 250% $3,854,387 339%
Terminated. vested 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total, 2' TM $ 0_3 _3W = ,85 ,3 M4%
PV of proj bens to
actives 3,184,115 285% 3,601,475 310% 3,439,320 302%
Total PV proj ben ;6,063,197 542% $6,504,824 560% $7,293,707 641%
Change from
1984/85/86 600,452 441,627 (788,883)
4. Comparative Sunmaries
1982 1983 1984 1985 1986
Assets 2,716,501 3,382,822 4,048,176 4,902,528 5,599,742
PV Benefit 4,752,785 5,513,637 6,112,800 6,553,126 7,293,707
% 57% 61% 66% 75% 77%
Unfund PV (2,036,284) (2,130,815) (2,064,624) (1,650,598) (1,693,965)
Payroll 1,019,440 1,080,590 1,118,093 1,161,698 1,137,705
% 200% 197% 185% 142% 149%
57
I
Reti10"aCity Police and Fire Department
ement and Pension Systems 06/30/85
Development.of Normal Cost
Page 5
III. Police Department Pension System - Section
410
A• Summary of Liabilities and Assets
Present
2. I. Present Value of Retirement Allowances
Assets
3. Future Liability$
Remai ning j(I)_(2)j
4• Current Level of Contributions
46,763
85 148
148
IV, Fire Department Pension System _ Section
,385
0
S 410
A' pry of Liabilities and Assets
I• Present Value of Retirement Allowances
2• Present Assets
3• Future Liability Remaining$
4• Current Level
103,885
0
of Contribuions-i
-I
IOW CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT RETIREMENT SYSTEM DETAIL
ACTIVE MEMBERS
6/3D/86
PAGE 1
Mere
Sea Birth
Etployrlt Retirmt EA CA RA Svc Coop
PV Cap Prfip
Pepe
PVPereiat.
PVOreDB
PVAcrDB
PVOr Dis
PVAccDis
BERG K
BROTNEATON
M 3/20/58 4/ 6/85 3/20/13 27 28 55 1 19728
328867 4385
2193
48521
3845
1685
CLARK
M 7/ 6/55
M 3/11/39
9/11/78 7/ 6/10 23 31 55 7 22689
2/ 1/68 3/11/94 29 47 55 18 26761
380008
4483
2242
68887
5090
1919
5814
7813
15153
19534
COATES
M 12/12/49 4/8/79 12/12/ 4 29 37 55 7 18923
187071
250882
2873
2955
1412
1478
136402
4714
951
7012
1870
COOK
M 1/ 9/45
1/14/67 1/ 9/ 0 22 41 55 19 0199
342568
4031
016
66481
127193
4251
1258
6403
16006
COK
M 10/25/46
9/16/71 10/25/ 1 25 40 55 14 26761
321267
3715
1858
109348
6859
1727
10221
15552
COMINGS
M 2/ 7/54
9/14/78 2/ 7/ 9 25 32 55 7 22689
367363
4311
2156
70540
6181
5112
1616
9239
230%
DRECKMAY
M 7/ 3/53
12/ 1/76 7/ 3/ 8 23 33 55 9 24880
397680
4545
2273
81651
5775
1851
7807
19517
DUFFY
M 6/30/52
5/15/78 6/30/ 7 26 34 55 8 22689
34540
3986
1993
75194
5206
2000
8781
21952
ELLIOT J
IS 6/28/59
2/23/85 6/18/14 26 27 55 1 19728
337649
4560
2280
47389
38101744
1735
7892
19731
FRAMSIARTN
M 1/30/54
4/0/79 1/0/ 9 25 32 55 7 18923
306387
3595
1798
58827
4263
1543
5820
15169
FORT
IS 11/29/42
9/16/67 11/29/97 25 44 55 18 0345
2WO49
3601
1801
139926
6320
1422
6511
16278
GASS R
IS S/ 8/59
S/ 6/84 S/ 8/14 25 21 55 1 1988
337649
4560
2280
47389
3810
1744
9327
23317
GOLDBERG
M 9/11/53
9/11/75 9/11/ 8 22 33 55 10 26761
431905
4889
244S
88%4
280
2172
5820
9549
15169
0
F 4/29/62
3/ 9/85 4/29/17 24 55 1 19728
26
362727
S130
185
µ46B80
3703
1972
5844
23872
15245
KAPPPIILI R
IS 10/22/59
7/ 7/53 10/22/14 27 55 2 18%5
330580
4384
22192
3821707
5785
14922
MARNEY
IS 4/17/42
2/ 1/68 4/17/9726 44 55 1S 0199
278702
3554
1792
139227
290
1415
9282
23205
UZUHUFF
9/ 92 28 49 55 2
165649
"74
528
5
16713
IS
N 12/27/51
2%1USS
6/79 12/27%6 27 35 55 7 18923
2735%
31%
15%
63212
280
1375
6473
16183
791810 9
N 7/14/56
7/0/SS 7/14/11 29 0 55 0 19728
305160
4054
2027
49286
3811
1545
5605
14792
13
215560
12204 527
154852
6756
110716483
JACKSIRI S
N 7/22/57
0/16/82 7/22/12 2S 29 55 20625
34275
4406
244
1763
127074
6546
JONKKEATIINNGG N
N 8/26/SS
31 55 4761
4/25/94
4916
2154
8802
22006
M 4/25/39
6/11/77 4/69 30 47 55 11 2626/1022
18071
2823
1412
136402
4764
7012
17530
KIBBEE R
N 4/15/52
9/17/81 4/15/ 7 29 34 55 4 20625
297912
3623
1812
6328
4438
1496
6656
16834
KOM
N 10/22/47
10/24/77 10/22/ 2 0 39 55 8 22689
27524
3276
1638
85368
5075
1385
7607
19018
KREI B
N 12/25/60
8/0/82 12/25/15 22 26 55 3 20625
375351
4958
2479
51139
4137
1959
65D7
16613
N
45
43463
49127
3817
1594
5774
LIMS
N 10/13/41
1/ 1/72 10/13/96 30 55 14 30345
257421
1752 2
Iµ238
6042
1309
8903
8
2298
t INM
N 6/27/42
4/16/71 6/27/97 29 44 55 15 26761
246979
3176
1588
123377
5574
1254
225
20564
LOAD
N 2/10/56
9/16/78 2/10/11 23 30 55 7 22689
392400
4661
2332
67297
502
1988
721
19551
4WMER L
N 6/26/51
7/28/84 6/26/ 6 33 35 55 1 19728
2618%
3332
1666
57232
4007
1314
5735
15176
MILLER
N 2/16/29
10/0/75 2/16/94 47 57 65 10 4218
287954
5067
2544
121773
14031
1631
28935
72337
MME
N 9/24/41
9/ 1/70 9/24/ 2 23 39 55 15 26761
339599
3864
1932
106562
286
1707
9419
23548
LAVERS J.
N 10/10/57
9/16/81 10/10/12 24 29 55 4 20625
351942
4405
2204
5209
4333
1792
6684
1685.
NEU21L
F 6/ 3/53
7/ 1/7S 6/ 3/ 8 22 33 55 10 26761
431905
4889
2445
68904
6260
2172
9549
2072
10/20/59
12 26 29 55 2 18965
11/
313011
676E
94
5774
14891
OCKENFELS C
F
7/18/81 0/14 22 27 55 4 20625
372082
2018247
95649
676,3
19 0
601
16929
PRESTEGARD
N S/ 3/53
1/ 3/78 S/ 3/ 8 25 33 55 6 22659
35880
4145
073
73418
5200
1801
7908
19770
RICHARDSON
M 6/ 6/54
9/15/78 6/ 619 24 32 55 7 22689
367363
4311
2156
70540
5112
1851
7807
19517
ROTM 0
N 12/21/57
9/26/19 12/21/12 22.29 55 6 18444
324400
3942
1971
52459
4022
1651
263
15658
SCNIILT2
N 5/13/47
4/16/71 5/13/ 2 24 3955 15 26761
339599
3864
1932
10652
6286
107
9419
23548
SELLERS
M 11/ 2/45
4/15/0 8/ 2/ 0 25 41 55 16 26761
03576
3572
1786
112682
6078
1530
9058
22644
SIMGLEMAN
M 9/ 7/50
9/ 2/74 9/ 7/ 5 24 36 SS I1 26761
385876
4346
2173
96605
6321
1936
9536
23839
STEFFIE J
N 5/17/60
6/17/82 5/17/15 22 26 55 3 20625
375351
4958
2479
51139
4137
1959
6507
16613
STIKA
N 4/0/39
9/15/67 4/30/94 28 475S 1826761
18071
2823
1412
136402
4744
951
7012
1830
STOCK
M 3/17/33
6/16/57 3/17/88 24 53 55 29 3245
0714
022
1511
236055
2258
358
3522
6806
STRAIKI
M 12/0/35 11/
1159 12/0/90 24 51 55 26 33093
123716
2964
1492
196M
3660
25
5568
13921
LALLA V
F 10/12/57
2/ 5179 10/12/12 21 2955 7 18923
337358
4044
2022
54500
4195
1717
6530
16124
SUEPPYL
N 11/ 1/39
1/ 2/72 11/ 1/94 32 4755 14 26761
186745
2823
1412
136124
4736
950
6999
17498
SWITZER S
N 3/0/58
9/25/81 3/20/13 24 28 55 4 2025
32152
4584 2292
54903
4299
1854
6692
16904
TEG6AT2
N 10/14/34 12/
1/61 10/14/89 27 52 55 24 30053
56000
2606
103
186765
2643
434
4069
10173
VIDMER
M 6/20/53
9/12/78 612018 25 33 55 7 22689
354481
4145 2073
72235
5126
1785
7796
19494
VYSS R
N 121 7/57
7/29/84 12/ 7/12 27 29 55 1 19728
319879
4216 2108
49650
3878
1630
5809
15143
TOTALS 54 1311571 16505335 4849714 269200 84040 415596 1046040
IOW CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT RETIREMENT SYSTEM
•
DETAIL
RETIRED MEMBERS 6/30/86
PAGE 1
"
Nam SRA Sys Type Birth CA Pnreim
PVPM5iM
Am fty PVAmuity
DOLElAI F 410 Y 8/10/12 74 424.29
46763
0.00
0
r
TOTAL SYSTEM 410 1 424
46763
i
p
p
EVAPSMAN N 411 0 2/23/20 66 1175.80
F 411
171357
40.95
5055
Y 5/22/ 5 01 J66.80
KARATS N 411 D 12/11/42 k 1731.93
30290
372818
14.88
1111
ROILAD
LEE R M 411 O 3/25/ 9 77 677.48
63512
0.00
34.26
p
7p30
LEWIS N 411 O 10/14/26 60 1182.52
201526
0.00
0
F 411 Y 11/ 216 80 356.02
N 411 0 5/22/23 63 1351.95
30745
35.22
2738
j
Poll
PO11ER N {it 0 8/17/ 3 83 740.88
195275
56550
40.78
p.70
<980
f
PUIIVIS N 411 0 2/ 1/16 70 1108.10
RWPERT
127811
25.10
3018
2525
j
N 411 O 2/ 3/ 9 77 753.71
SPRIER N 411 0 7/8/18 68 823.48
8092
35.21
3123
t
-
SPRINKLE F 411 Y S/ 2/t0 76 288.65
113117
29478.
80.64
13.70
9470
v
f
UNITE N 411 0 7/18/12 74 653.48
73208
37.38
1238
3679
.._
a
RUPPE F 411 Y $122/8 78 668.27
RV►ERI V N 411 0 6/14/8 61 1279.26
62908
34.93
+
o>
k
KIDYEL N 411 0 9/15/35 51 1341.78
212855
0.00
0,00
p86968
0
ei
{.
TOTAL SYSTEM UI 16 1460
20s10
436
.t
yy
1L,
t
i•
.,
IOWA CITY
BEDEPARTMENT RETIREMENT SYSTEM DETAIL
SREFT
Nm Sex Birth G Be fit PVBe fit
1ENMETER TIM M 3/30/69 W 131.36 534
TOTAL 1 131 534
IOWA CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT RETIREMENT SYSTEM DETAIL --UNIT CREDIT METHOD
PACE 1
ACTIVE MEMBERS
6/30/86
Neese
Sex Birth E,ploynt Net l rent EA CA RA Svc Comp
PV AMP
PV VMP
Pen PVPersim
PVOrmB
PVAccDB PVOrmis PVAcc01s
IERG K
N 3/20/58
4 6/85 3/20/13 27 28 55 1 19728
819
0
2193
2141
170
74
471
257
1916
669
4790
BROTHERTOR
N7/ 6/55
3/11/39
9/11/78 7/ 6/10 23 31 55 7 22689
2/ 1/68 3/11/94 29 47 55 18 26761
9248
88101
0
88101
2242
1412
16892
96192
1248
3346
671
4945
12762
CLARK
COATES
N
N 12/12/49
4/25/79 12/12/ 4 29 37 55 7 18923
11290
0
1478
18625
1191
353
1794
4484
COOK
N 1/ 9/45
1/2467 1/ 9/ 0 22 41 55 19 30199
68581
68581
2016
74997
4044
1018
6027
15067
Cox
M 10/25/46
9/16/11 10/25/ 1 25 40 55 14 26761
41765
0
1658
53711
3036
794
4538
11345
COMINGS
N 2/ 7/54 9/14/78 2/ 7/ 9 25 32 55 7 22689
7/ 3/53 12/ 1/16 1/ 3/ 8 23 33 55 9 24880
9848
15231
0
0
2156
2273
18088
24764
1311
1751
475
607
2002
2663
5005
6655
DRECKMN
DUFFY
M
M 6/30/52
5/15/75 6/30/ 7 26 34 55 8 22689
12979
0
1993
20977
1452
484
2202
268
5504
699
ELLIOT J
N 6/28/59
1/30/54
2/23/85 6/28/14 26 27 55 1 19728
6/30/79 1/30/ 9 25 32 55 7 18923
769
8212
0
0
2280
1798
2184
14171
176
1027
00
372
1568
3921
FRANSWRTM
FORT
N
N 11/29/42
9/16/67 11/29/97 25 44 55 18 30345
80335
80335
1801
87047
3932
884
5802
14505
961
LASS R
N 8/ TIM
8/ 6/84 81 8/14 25 27 55 1 19728
9/11/75 9/11/ 0 22 33 55 10 26761
769
18435
0
0
2280
2445
3001
29103
241
2056
110
711
369
3126
7815
GOLDBERG
MANSOR 0
N 9/11/53
f 4/29/62
3/ 9/85 4/29/17 23 24 55 1 19728
637
0
2565
1799
1st
80
238
551
621
1421
NAPPIL R
N 10/22/59
7/ 7/83 10/22/14 24 27 55 2.18965
4/17/9726 44 55 18 30199
1540
80024
0
80024
2192
1792
4465
87765
357
3965
163
092
5851
14628
VARNEY
NO2LETT
N 4/17/42
N 9/ 9/37
2/ 1/68
7/12/65 9/ 9/92 28 49 55 20 30199
128650
128650
1473
127883
3454
639
5161
12902
4294
MIFF
N 12/27/S1
2/ 6/79 12/2716 27 35 S5 7 18923
9729
0
1598
16771
1135
364
55
1117
198
522
MM K
N 7/14/56
7/30/85 7/14/11 29 30 55 0 19728
9/23/74 7/22/96 37 49 59 11 26761
0
36932
0
0
2027
1527
1741
54480
135
3643
591
5838
14596
INIEe"
JACKSON S
N 7/22/37
N 7/22/57
8/16/82 7/22/12 8 29 55 3 20625
2912
0
2204
7096
549
1585
228
595
639
2432
2140
6079
JONNSOR N
N 8/26/55
4/25/39
411/77 8/26/10 22 31 55 9 24880
6/ 4/69 4/25/94 30 47 55 17 26761
13430
83211
0
83271
2458
1412
21507
93553
3254
653
4809
12023
KEATING
KIBUE R
N
N 4/15/52
9/17/81 4/15/ 7 29 34 55 4 20625
5447
0
1812
11840
630
1765
280
481
1245
2643
3150
6607
IMOL1t
N 10/22/47
10/24/77 10/22/ 2 30 39 55 8 22689
20625
17928
2414
0
0
1638
2479
29658
5867
476
225
749
1911
KNEI R
N 12/2S/60
5/ 2/57
8/30/82 12/25/15 22 26 55 3
7/ 6/83 S/ 2/12 Z6 29 55 2 18965
1745
0
2027
5065
395
165
598
1541
LEIK M
1.1 115
N
N 10/13/41
1/ 1/72 10/13/96 30 45 55 14 30345
67039
0
1732
84373
3534
3215
766
728
5208
4774
13020
11936
LIMN
M 6/27/42
4/16/71 6/27/97 29 K 55 15 26761
59047
8686
59047
0
1588
2332
71612
16169
1216
478
1879
4698
LORD
N 2/10/56
6/26/51
9/18/78 2/10/11 23 30 55 7 22609
7/28/86 6/26/ 6 33 35 55 1 19728
1271
0
1666
5021
352
115
503
1331
PALMER L
MILLER
N
N 2/16/29
10/20/75 2/16/94 47 57 65 10 48218
43702
0
2544
71077
8190
932
843
16889
4650
42222
11626
11000.E
N 9/24/47
9/ 1/70 9/24/ 2 23 39 55 15 26761
41926
41926
0
1932
2204
52621
8665
3104
668
276
1030
2603
LAVERS J.
N 10/10/57
9/16/81 10/10/12 24 29 55 4 20625
6/ 3/ 8 22 37 55 10 26761
3979
18435
0
2445
29697
2098
725
3190
7974
MEUZIL
f 613/53
N 10/27/17
7/ 1/75
1/ 1/83 10/27/12 26 29 55 2 18965
1745
0
2027
$022
390
163
590
1020
1522
2575
VIRILE T.
OCKENFEGASDO
4 20625
s/ 8 25 33 ss
3511
0
0
2 73
20353
18170 4456
m
505
2214
5534
�/SS
M S/9
1/13/78 3/ 8 22689
6/ 6/ 9 24 32 55 7 22689
12183
9848
0
2156
17886
1296
469
1980
4949
RICXARDSOR
M b/ 6/54
N 12/21/57
9/15/78
9/26/79 12/21/12 22 29 55 6 18444
5589
0
1971
016
336
635
1274
4609
3185
11522
ROTH G
SCMULtt
N 5/13/47
416/71 5/13/ 2 24 39 55 15 26761
41926
41926
1932
52452
52152
60282
3076
3252
819
4046
12114
SELLERS
M 0/ 2µS
415/70 0/ Z/ 025 41 55 16 26761
1/ 5 24 36 55 11 26761
51167
24807
51167
0
1786
2173
76042
2410
7311
7677
9992
SINGLEMN
M 9/ 7/50
N 5/17/60
9/ 2/74 9/
8/17/82 5/17/15 22 26 55 3 20625
2414
0
2479
6042
409
211
672
769
4949
1963
12372
STE/fME J
STIKA
N 4/30/39
9/17/67 4/30/94 iB 47 SS 18 26761
88101
88101
1412
96271
222699
3348
2132
338
3726
1915
STOCK
N 3/17/33
6/16/51 3/17/08 24 53 55 29 36245
235099
235899
181872
1511
1492
160761
3111
535
4764
11911
STRAND
N 12/30/31
11/ 1/59 12/30/90 24 51 55 26 37093
101072
6004
0
2022
12045
922
377
1435
SSD7
LALLA V
1 10/12/57
Z/ 5/79 10/12/12 21 29 55 7 18923
32 47 55 14 761
13/20/17
637737
0
1412
650
2000
12509
54
N 13/20/58
9/28/81 24 28 55 260625
0
2292
8293
383
1011
3589
8971
517112ER B
M 10/1<p<
1i/ 1/bt 10/14/09 27 52 55 24 30053
179455
179455
1303
16478
2331
343
2393
TEGGAT2
27 33 7 22689
1
2073
133661
1263
110
1025
WSS R
N 12/27/57
7/29/84 12/27/12 55 1 19
0�
0
2108
1311571
1924212
1408155
2269588
100033
25557
155362
389042
TOTALS 54
F
I
IOWA CITY FIRE DEPARTMENT RETIREMENT SYSTEM DETAIL
ACTIVE MERGERS 6/30/06 PAGE 1
if� Sax Birth Eytoyst Retirst EA CA RA Svc Cap PV Cap PrCrp Pw PVPr im PVOrmG PVAcc9G PVOrmle PVAccO1c
ALLEN
SECKLER
N 5/19/47 11/16/72
N 2/ 6/49 1/25/75
5/19/ 2 25 39 55 13 23621
2/ 6/ 4 26 37 55 11 23621
298369
325564
3410
1705
93490
5517
1499
8267
20666
TERRY R
M 7/24/56
10/ 9/82
7/24/11 26 30 55 3 20080
327255
3669
4126
1845
2063
87492
54659
5551
4162
1633
8355
20889
BRENEMAN
M 12/21/46
6/ 5/74
12/21/ 1 27 40 55 12 23621
281132
3279
1640
95546
5406
1659
1414
6308
16099
BROOKS
N 2/ 3/46
2/ 1/72
2/ 3/ 1 26 40 55 14 23621
283568
3279
1640
96518
5456
1426
8080
8154
20199
20386
CONNELL
N 4/16/54
9/ 5/78
4/16/ 9 24 32 55 7 20800
336780
3952
1976
64650
4666
1697
7157
17892
COOK S
1
32 55 4 20060
22
311709
1640
4295
1570
6496
16413
CRAIG
N 4/12/46
5/20/68
4/12/ 1 40 55 18 23621
284094
3279
96714
5466
1429
6170
20425
CNN
N 1/30/47
1/ 1/70
1/30/ 2 23 3955 16 23621
300013
3410
1705
94059
5548
1507
8314
20785
DEEDS
N 9/23/55
5/10/84
9/23/10 29 31 55 2 19792
307492
3911
1956
53731
4041
1554
6018
15535
DOLAN
N 2/10/34
8/11/77
2/10/9 24 32 55 8 21662
355003
4116
2058
68435
4951
1788
7560
18900
OOLEZAL
N 9/25/45
7/ 1/70
9/25/ 0 25 41 55 15 23483
266786
3135
1568
96928
5334
1343
7946
19870
MS
1/41/15158
9/30/2
26 55 55 28 23621
1/97F
23621
11194
941
161073
840
121
1351
3452
N
1/0/7
9/30/97 29 k 55 14 23621
217603
2803
14U
1%706
4911
1105
7247
16116
FARMER
N 3/20/41
2/16/73
3/20/96 32 45 55 13 23621
199711
2695
1348
111803
4686
1015
6906
17265
FIALA
N 11/15/37
9/ 1/74
11/15/96 37 49 59 11 25607
207866
2%5
1473
97493
6515
1067
10443
26107
FJELSTAD
M 5/26/38
1/ 1/66
5/26/93 28 48 55 20 28123
174617
2853
1421
148616
4603
887
6873
17063
FLAKE
N TO/ 1/45
1/ 1/7
10/ 1/ 0 26 41 55 14 23621
267459
3153
1S"
99295
5355
1348
7979
19949
GIESKING
M 11/ 9/38
6/17/66
0/ 9/93 28 48 55 20 25807
160252
2618
1309
136326
4224
814
6270
15676
OOOLSSY
N 1/16/59
5/ 7/84
1/16/14 25 2753 2 19792
344992
4575
2288
48M
3915
1782
6037
15573
NAMSEM
N 10/27/40
9/16/69
10/27/% 29 46 55 16 25807
200070
2631
1416
127056
4862
1018
7198
179%
MA SO11
N 2/24/49
7/16/7
2/24/ 4 23 37 55 13 23621
329459
3689
1845
80740
5623
1653
8464
21161
NOFKINS
N 1/24/48
1/ 1/7
1/24/ 3 24 3855 14 23621
315148
3547
1774
91439
5600
1562
6411
21027
NAtACNEK
N 1/24/42
1/ 1/66
1/24/97 24 " 55 20 23621
217997
2803
1402
108926
4920
1107
760
18150
NNSTON J
M 11/ 8/54
10/20/81
11/ S/ 9 2732 55 4 20080
311709
3615
1908
5879
4295
1570
6496
16413
IRVING
M S/ 9/31
4/23/60
5/ 9/86 29 55 SS 26 32380
32360
2596
1290
220780
1151
166
1093
4731
KANLER
N S/ 1/52
5/19/86
S/ 1/ 8 34 34 56 0 19792
275905
3616
1808
50233
4192
1367
6009
16006
KINNEY
M 3/ 6/36
9/ 1/65
3/6/91 2950 55 20 32380
148503
3037
1519
164793
4227
751
6368
15921
KLODS
N 3/23/35
7/21/59
3/23/90 24 51 SS 26 32380
121040
2920
1460
192554
3581
611
5448
13621
KOCN
N 4/13/61
4/18/84
4/13/16 23 25 55 2 19792
362464
4948
2474
46666
3645
1924
6055
15624
LAMUTAFF
M 8/31/46.
8/15/77
041/1 31 40 55 8 21662
249529
3007
1504
83786
477
1255
7143
17857
LIRA
N 1/17/45
8/27/69
1/17/0 25 41 55 16 23621
267952
3153
1577
9%96
5365
1351
7995
195117
MILLER
M 1/26µI
1/ 1/7
1/26/96 31 45 55 14 23621
200382
2695
1345
112259
4703
1019
6931
17326
MINFORD
N S/ 7/41
2/ 1/73
8/ 7/% 31 45 55 13 23621
199711
2695
1348
111803
4656
1015
6906
1765
MEALSOM
M 8/27/42
1/ 1/69
8/27/97 26 44 55 17 23621
217997
2803
1402
106926
4920
1107
760
18150
MONEMSEAG
N 1/13/48
7/16/7
1/13/ 3 25 38 55 13 23621
314019
3547
1774
91071
5579
1576
8379
20947
PLAT2 L
M 9/23/53
5/13/63
9/23/ 8 30 33 55 3 20060
2%392
3668
1834
58665
4228
1490
6293
16093
ROCCA
N 5/13/58
7/14/78
5/13/13 20 28 55 7 20800
381715
4623
2312
58867
4577
1953
7187
17%8
SCMAAPVELD
N 7/ 5/46 12/23/68
7/ S/ 1 22 40 55 1723621
2840%
3279
1640
%714
5466
1429
8170
20425
8111011111135
N 10/13/53
4/23/77 10/13/ 8 24 33 55 922632
361760
4135
2068
74287
$253
1619
7966
19969
UWA
M 4/24/42
2/ 1/68
4/24/97 26 44 55 18 25807
238166
3062
1531
118949
5375
1219
7932
19830
STANNEN
M 2/25/44
5/15/68
2/25/99 24 42 55 18 25807
274849
3312
1656
111680
577
1389
8506
21264
STUTSNAN
N 10/13/45
7/16/7 10/13/
0 27 41 55 13 23621
266517
3153
1577
9693
5335
1343
7950
19074
INITTAIEN
M 2/14/37 12/ 1/61
2/14/92 25 49 55 24 25807
139591
2517
1259
141583
3823
707
5713
14282
MISSING
M 9/18/38 12/ 1/61
9/18/93 27 45 55 24 23621
146681
2396
1196
124766
3666
745
5739
14348
WNACNER
M 7/ 1/36
1/21/64
7/ 1/91 28 SO 55 22 32350
148503
3037
1519
184793
4227
751
6165
15921
USS
N 10/ 4/58 11/21/83 10/
4/13 25 28 55 2 19792
335931
4399
2200
$0087
3930
171
6031
15554
BLANK J
N 12/30/49
5/26/81 12/30/
4 31 37 55 5 15661
243912
2945
1473
61736
4111
1223
6194
15485
TOTALS 48
1137705
12156015
4815690
223746
61529
336210
84473
9
IOM CITY FIRE DEPARTMENT RETIREMENT SYSTEM DETAIL
PAGE 1
RETIRED MEMBERS
6/30/86
mm
Sex
Sys Type
Birth CA Pension PVPemim Am Ity PVAm lty
DOLEZAL
A410
0 3/31/91 89 927.69
51669
0.00
0
0
MCNABB
F
410
N 8/ 7/99 87 378.86
23379
0.00
0
MORGAN
F
410
N 1/ 3/ 4 82 365.53
28837
0.00
TOIAL SYSTEM
410
3 1672
103885
0
0
ESEE
N
411
0 1/12/17 69 1042.61
135823
62.43
7139
BOGS
N
411
411
0 6/14/39 47 1296.04
V 2/ 8/11 75 421.72
266330
44771
0.00
16.32
0
1527
CAPPS
OESLING
F
1411
V 1/ 1µ3 43 977.46
221767
0.00
0
0
DONEUL
M
411
411
0 8/29/23 63 688.20
V 3/13/ 6 80 416.83
108876
35997
0.00
23.07
1793
FAY
FAY
F
N
411
D 9/16/25 61 1052.77
160653
23.68
3028
FORMAN
N
411
D 9/26/31 55 1169.27
206379
22.47
31.76
3237
3349
G1114N0D
N
F
411
411
0 3/30/ 9 77 674.71
V S/ 9/28 SO 493.88
67221
86743
38.43
5515
NEIN
EMT
N
411
0 12/12/47 39 1294.99
297979
0.00
0
0
NESS
N
411
0 12/30/21 65 7%.20
119055
0.00
0
HEATING
N
411
0 9/ 1/27 59 1927.13
0 8/12/12 74 839.72
309661
94072
0.00
48.70
4793
INOEDEL E
N
411
0/19 67 673.06
277
91631
32.31
3992
3661
EIi1EI1NEVIR
M
411
0 7/11/15 71 734.91
6/30/17 69 834.08
99659
33.8E
16.29
1690
imts N
N MI$ L
M
N
411
411
0
0 11/16/14 72 565.81
68151
26.15
2743
1042
EMT
N411
D 7/21/1769 477.10
0 4/ 6/ 9 77 1069.81
57006
106585
10.04
45.89
4071
SEINON
STINNEL
N
N
411
411
0 10/31/21 65 806.34
120875
0.00
0
0
VILLBMIEN
N
411
0 2!23/24 62 737.65
V 9/30/22 64 399.09
119731
60476
0.00
9.08
1155
VORRICM
PARROTT
F
N
411
411
0 1/21/23 63 956.71
151356
0.00
0
0
IDEAS
N
411
0 2/ 9/43 43 701.03
D, 42
15/13/43
160653
243
0.00
0.00
411
43 11/24/44
114.91
22.47 43468
0.00
0
LNASKEIMIT
N
411
D
TOTAL SYSTEM 411
27 23367
3?M38
447
48635
a1
al
TOM CITY FIRE DEPARTMENT RETIREMENT SYSTEM DETAIL
'
CNILDREWS BENEFITS 6/30/86
a
Yre SOX Birth CA Benefit PVBenefit
NEIN LARRY N 11/21/68 18 131.96 1556
i
DESLING CHRIS F 10/ 2/70 16 131.96 2379
FOREMAN WINE M 4/29170 16 131.96 2379
TOTAL 3 396 6314
7!
N�
y
j
1
I'
I�
I'
IOW CITY FIRE DEPARTMENT RETIREMENT SYSTEM DETAIL• -UNIT
ACTIVE MEMBERS
6/30/" CREDIT METHOD
Mr
Sex 1111h EWI-Mt Retirew EA CA NA In CORP PV
PAGE 1
ALLEN
fECRLEA
AMP PV VMP Pen
M 5/19/47 11/16/72 5/19/ 2 25 79 55 17 23621
PVPe J.
PVOrmC
PVAccDR
DVOrmie
PYAcc9fe
/EERY R
31913
N 2/ 6/49 1/25/75 216/ L 26 77 SS 11 27621 23331 00 1705 1845
N 7/24/56 10/ 9/82 7/24/11 26 3331
47159
34449
2547
692
3816
9340
MENNENAN
CANOES
30 55 7 20080
N 12/21/46 6/ 5/74 12/21/ 1 27 40 55 12 0 2063
7072
2185
538
215
3290
8225
COOXELL
23621 713020 285
N 2/ 7/46 2/ 1/72 2/ 7/ 1 26 40 55 1L 23621 0 1640
N 4/16/54 36842
41866
215
620
816
2083
COOK f
0 1640
9/ 5/78 4/16/ 9 24 32 55 710800 9070
N 3/ 6/54 12/ 4/81 3/ 619 28 32 0 1976
47%3
16513
22711
3550
052
8851
1[570
GROW
55 4 20060 79
N 4/12/46 5/20/68 {/12/ 1 22 40 55 18 23621
9852
1197
721
477
1828
DEED
DEEDS
47{ 72 [7772 19"
N 1/W/47 1/ 1/70 1/30/ 2 23 3955 16 23621 39499
N 9/27/55
572!9
7010
267
7867
1090
2753
OOIAN
8EIMNIJIDS 0LE2AL
39499 1705
5/10/84 9/23/10 29 31 55 2 19792 2060
N 2/10/54 8/11/77 2/10/ 9 2{ 72 SS
�
2�
4498
4275
11246
10660
8 21662 10907 0 2058
M 9/25/!5 7/ 1/70 9/25/ 0 25 41 55 15 2340
19307
1397
1392
488
8
1260
FARM
42082 42082 1568
M 11/10/31 4/15/58 11/10/86 26 55 55 28 23621
52307
05
33
5332
FARM
167371 167311 947
M 9/70/!2 1/30/72 9/30/97 29 K S5 14 23621
159042
829
41205
4203
0514
12014
FIEIA
FLAKE
48578
M 7/20/41 2/16/73 3/20/96 32 45 55 13 23621 48271 0 1702
M 11/tS/37 9/ 1/74 11/15/96 3749 59 11.25807
61059
"737
2758
2714
120
621
4070
103408
176
D
75608
M 5/26/38 I/ 1/66 5/26/93 28 4S SS M 28123 110915 110915 1477
M TO/ 1/45 1/ 1/72 10/ 1/ 0 2641 55
1151942
11"
3471
S0
569
3999
55"
9997
13909
GIESK
CIESKING
M S/ 9/38 6/17/66 µ 23621 39416 0 1577
/ 9/97 2S 27 55 20 25807
S11161%
3463
667
5111
12778
NANSEN
Wall
2S 27 1010{ 101854 1309
100627
3178
6680
01
4024
110503719
M 10/27/40 9/16/69 10/27/95 29 46 55 16 25807
3539
20
129
4628
w%I"
NOPKINS
70168 70160 1416
M 2/24/49 7/16/72 2/24/4 27 37 55 17 25621 27993
M
1639
3139
655
[37
1126
MDACMFK
1/2{/b 1/ 1/72 1/24/ 3 2438 55 14 27621 72267
N 1/24/42
730
4627
7737
19344
0 177{
1/ 1/66 1/24/97 24 K 55 20 27621 69536
N 11/ 8/K 10/20/81 71/ 8/ 9 27 32
3267{
7487[
26487
3925
IRVING
IRVING1
KANLER
fM36
55 4 20080 t�
N S/ 9/71 4/23/60 5/ 9/86 29 55 55 26 32]80
9M
72{8738
719
730
263
[791
11976
KLOCIS
M 8/ 1/52 5119/65 8/ 1/ 8 34 34 56 0 19792 224450 229455 1298
22181
1122
162
1087
2747
KL808
M 3/6/36 9/ 1/6S 3/ 6/91 29 50 55 20 72380 149270 1!9270 15819
M 3/23/75 7/21/59
1901
4 5
92
KOCX
3/27/90 24 51 55 26 72780 177915 149915 1460
M 4/13/61 4/18/86 4/13/16 27 25 SS
15088
169175
3451
3145
617
5199
12998
ii
2 19382 1415
N 8/31/b 8/17/77 8/31/ 131 41 SS 021662 18273
3211
2"
577
172
5786
416
119"
MULWA ILLER
MlltEt
0 1504
5S 16 23621 45174 451710 1577
N 1/26/41 1/21/7!
30M
1763
463
2637
1075
6592
INNFORS
SMEME
1/26/9631 45 55.14 23621 52132 1X8
M 8/ 7/41 2/ 1/73 8/ 7/96 31 45 55 13 23621
SSW
67615
2973
203
749
614
4431
11077
NOIIENIEAG
48271 0 1348
N 8/27/42 1/ 1/69 8/27/97 26 K 55 t7 23621 59125
63773
2673
579
576
4174
7979
10[76
PLAT2 L
59125 1402
M 1/13/48 7/16/72 1/13/ 3 25 38 55 1323621 2978 1774
M 9/23/53 5/13/0 987
66511
3003
4437
9"8
1180
ROCCA/27/
SCKV,PW
8 30 37 55 3 20080 9 167{
7714/711 15/11
!1682
3053
522
721
3835
SMOTHERS87
SMOTHERS
M 7//15/46 12/23/68 7/3/58
22 0 55 17 23621 44578
5085
1046
47242
46
1643
4107
STAM*
44878 16440
M 10/13/53 4/23/77 10/17/ 8 24 33 55 9 2202 13866 0 2068
/24/42 2/ 1/68
M !21251"
2q 6
4400
I�
0TAW
5/2!/97 26 K SS 18 25807 6070 6070 1571
5/15/611 24 42 55 111 25ROF
21081
74932
1573
77862331
571
t MS
YISSIAKER
59453 SWSO
N 10/13/45 7/16/72 10/17/0 27 41 55 13 23621
Small,
7372
818
4997
12492
YtSSIMK
36497 1577
N 2/14/77 12/ 1/61 2/14/92 25 49 55 24 25807 120891 120891
M
5009
3928
12522
91121
1259
9/18/38 12/ 1/61 9/16/93 23 b 55 24 23621 102438 102479 1198
M 7/ 1/20 1/21/64 7/ 1/91 28 50 55 22
115227
q49µ9
71612
2920
5 6
4"9
11627
w4D8ACMEA
144946 3
32380 164112 1"112 1519 151107
11/21/113 TO/ 25
6576
14
4437
5207
N 12/30/{9 5/26681 12/30/13
2200
4 71 37 55 5 18861 77715
4374
345
150
527
11019
1358
TOTALS 46
00 147!
13762
2"
1337
3344
11377M 2481921 187DO19 2762101 104263 25178
156420 391358
Iowa Department of
Economic Development
200 East Grand Avenue
Des Moines, IA 50309
Aoaress Corte@on Reouesleo
Inoluoe Maamg Laoe, NWneel
Return Postage Guaranleto
Governor Brarutad with representatives from the Iowa
Stale Association of Counties. Iowa Association of School
Boards, League of Iowa Municipalities, and the lows
Association Of Community College trustees at the procla-
mations signing ceremony for Local Government Week.
s
4,, Jim Sch0enfelder
410 E. Washington
Iowa City, IA 52240
BULK RATE
U.S POSTAGE
PAID
DES MOINES. IOWA
PERMIT NO 7195
Community Progress
Forming A Foundation
*Forming a solid foundation
Communi
for economic development.
that's the purpose of a four -
Progress
page fact sheet called the
Community Quick Reference
(CQR).
Volume 1, No. 2
In general lems. this
December. 1986
brochure represents a con-
cise sketch of a community
—from population. to sewer
capacities, to available
work force, to educational
systems.
Developed by the Iowa
Department of Economic De-
velopment (I.D.E.D.). the
CQR serves two practical func-
tions. First. it encourages
individual communities to
research and publish (at
State expense) a tool that
enables citizens to market
their own community.
Businessmen, the clergy.
housewives. teachers, and
restaurant operators can OR
have access to accurate
data of vital importance to
business or industrial pros.
pects. When properly pie.
pared. local citizens can be
a city's best marketing
team.
The Importance of com-
munity members knowing
such information is demon.
strated by the example of
Sam Walton. Walton, presi-
dent and founder o1 the
Walmarl chain, Is known to
anonymously call upon
cities he's considering for a
store location. Typically
dressed in blue jeans and a
work shin, he mingles with
the people .. jasking ques.
lions and getting answers.
The quality of those answers
may make the decided
difference.
The CQR can help a com-
munity prepare to answer
such questions.
Secondly. the CQR serves
as a reference tool for the
I.D.E.D. When prospects
contact the Slate requesting
a list of cities that meet a
specific business criteria.
those cities can and will be
represented. The I.D.E.D.
cannot easily market a
community who does not
have a CQR on file.
To date. 265 of Iowa's 954
communities have CQRs on
We. The process for com-
pleting a COR is relatively
simple, and begins by
requesting a CQR form from
j the I.D.E.D. Regional consul -
fonts are available for assis-
tance by phoning 515/281-
3536 or by writing.
Division for Community
Progress
Iowa Department of
Economic Development
,2D0 East Grand
,
Des Moines, IA 50309
Energy
Savings
♦ On June 20, 1986 Gover-
nor Branstad presented the
1986 Iowa Awards for Excel.
lence in Energy Conserva-
Bon to live outstanding
energy saving projects from
industry, agriculture, educa-
tional institutions and
communities. The award-
winning projects are,
■ the Energy Savings Pay.
back Fund (ESPF), an
internal revolving fund
in Iowa City,
■ a pre-treatment system/
biogas generator used
by FDL Foods Inc., in
Dubuque,
■ a Tena -Temp geother-
mal livestock watering
fountain sponsored by
Energy Recall Systems
Inc. of Coralville,
■ the Energy Management
Technician program at
Maharlshi International
University, and
■ a Comprehensive Com-
munity Energy Manage-
ment Demonstration in
Sioux Center.
! Details of Iowa City's are
reported below:
I Iowa City. a community of
t 50,000, received the award
for use o1 the Energy Savings
I Payback Fund (ESPF), which
converts $67,000 of utility
company refunds from over-
charges into $1.5 million
worth of energy conserva-
tion measures, generating
$2.5 million worth of energy
savings over 20 years. Iowa
City is an energy conscious
i community, motivated by
an energy consumption
increase of 260 percent
between 1978 and 1985,
The $138,000 loan fund.
established with matching
monies from the city and a
grant from the Iowa Depart-
ment of Natural Resources.
financed energy conserva.
tion improvements in public
facilities. All conservation
measures. with a seven-
year or less payback, were
eligible for financing. The
net effect of the investments
is the generation of a
revenue stream for future
energy conservation meas.
ures. Reduced energy con.
sumption will also positively
impact the city's energy
budget. All energy conser-
vation measures were
Implemented by September
30. 1986 and savings are
accruing.
In addition. Iowa City has
launched a series of support
activities which enhance
the energy management
program established by the
revolving loan fund. An
energy audit of the water
treatment plant shows
potential energy savings of
$16.000 per year and a
three-year simple payback..
Maintenance stall utilize a
flue gas analyzer to test
energy efficiency of the
heating systems in city -
owned buildings. The
potential for sharing this
equipment with both the
school district and Johnson
County compounds the use-
fulness of the analyzer,
Go
Astudy by Stanley Consul -
Ian ts of Muscarine high-
lighted the technical and
economic feasibility solid waste
con-
verting the city'
into useable energy. Low
income elderly residents
benefit from a light bulb
,
replacementpprogram. in -
program replaces
candescent bulbs with direct '
replacement fluorescent
bulbs to generate annual
savings of $9.000 per year.
The entire legion can
review diffetent
via their and energy
local cable television
programming.
An aggressive energy
management program has
paid off for Iowa City. The
activities are directly trans-
lerable to any municipality.
The program provides a
foundation for future energy
conservation invents
and creates a positive
edlale•
revenue stream irnnt
payback Flmd, the ee ciity is Savings
pumping S 194.295 into the
local economy. Economic
opportunities abound for
small contractors who install
energy conservation meas-
uies, the annual energy
savings reduces the cost of
government. and dollars
return to the local
community.
For more inlormation on
energy conservation
projects, contact the Iowa
Department of Natural
Resources at 5151281.6555.
'Iry Iowa
♦ A new promotion of
Iowans by Iowans—lo create
buying Patterns among
Iowa companies—has been
launched. The "Try Iowa"
campaign encourages Iowa
companies to purchase their
goods and services from an
Iowa -based supplier when
price. quality and service
are comparable.
The campaign is a
cooperative effort by the
Iowa Department of Eco-
nomic Development and
the Greater Des Moines
Chamber of Commerce Fed-
eration. Goals of the cam-
paign include stimulating
the Slate's economy:
promoting Iowa goods and
services: and helping main-
` tain and Increase Iowa lobs.
For more Wormotion. contact:
Iowa Department of
Economic Development
200 East Grand Avenue
Des Moines, IA 50309
Phone, 5151281.3536
CDBG
Program
News
♦ Communities interested in
applying for Community
Development Block Grant
(CDBG) funds are reminded
that all aPPlicatians for the
regular program are due
Tuesday. December 23 at
4:30 p.m. The completed
applications must be at the
Iowa Department of Eco-
nomic Development's offices
(200 East Grand Avenue.
Des Moines) at that time.
Any questions regarding
CDBG aPPlicahons should
be o dn
CDBG program Coordinator.
at 5151281-3890-
-7
Award Winners
Neighborhoods
is' ($500) -Camelot. Council
Bluffs
2nd ($400) -Viet Nam Vets,
Clinton
3rd (S300}Drake. Des
Moines
4th (5200) -Southside,
Council Blulls
5th ($100) -Greenwood. Des
Moines
Honorable Mention (S50)_
Lyons. Clinton
Honorable Mention (S50)_
Hillcrest, Fort Dodge
Communities
Population over 7,500
Ist (S500}Slorm Lake
2nd (5400)-0elweln
3rd ($300) -Creston
4th ($200) -Ankeny
5th ($100) -Boone
Honorable Mention ($50) -
Fort Dodge,
Honorable Mention (S50) -
Marion
Population 4,000-7,500
1st ($500) -Harlan
2nd ($400) -Independence
31d ($300) -Sheldon
41h (S2DD)-De Will
51h (5100}Maquokela
Honorable Mention ($50)_
Algona
Honorable Mention ($50) -
Hampton
Population 2,400-4,000
Isf ($500;i- -SOC City
2nd ($400> -Eldora
3rd (5300) -Clarion
41h (S200}Lamoni
51h ($I00) -Grundy Center
Honorable Mention (S50> -
Story City
Honorable Mention (S50}
Guttenberg
Population 1,200-2,400
Isf ($500)-Hoislein
2nd ($400) -Sumner
3rd (5300) -Ida Grove
41h ($2M -Corydon
i 5th (SI00)-Avoca
Honorable Mention (S50)_
Greene
Honorable Mention (S50) -
Stuart
Population 700-1,200
Ist (S500}Cows
2nd (S400)--Goldlield
i 3rd ($300> -Manilla
j 41h ($200)-Riceville
51h (SI00)-Rulhven
Honorable Mention (S50)-
Riverside
S50)-
Riverside
Honorable Mention ($SO}
Eddyville
Population 400-700
Ist (5500}Radclrlle
2nd ($400}Hawkeye
31d ($300)-Tllonka
4th (S200> -Charlotte
5111 ($100) -Russell
Honorable Mention ($50) -
Lost Nation
Honorable Mention (S50}
Grand Mound
Population 0-400
Is[ 0500}Hanlonlown
2nd ($400}Fiscus
3rd ($300}Grallon
4th (5200}Beaman
5th IS 100}Low 1
5th ($100}Maurice Tie
Honorable Mention (S50} I
Bristow
Honorable Mention (S50)-
Rose
S50)-
Rose Hill
Youth
Population over 5,000
ISI (S200}I01,10 Falls Youth
2nd (SIM -Harlan Youth
3rd ($100) -Ankeny Youth
Honorable Mention -Council
Bluffs Youth -City Slickers
Honorable Mention -Algona
Population 825-5,000
1st (S200)_West Marshall
Youth
2nd ($150}Hubbard Youth
31d (5100) -Hedrick Youth
Honorable Mention -Nora
Springs Youth
Honorable Mention -Greene
Youth
PoPulation 0-825
lsl (5200> -Murry Youth
2nd (Sl50)-0We Youth
31d (S1o0)-bows Youth
Honorable Mention-
Fonlanelle Youth
Honorable Mention -Hames
city Youth
W01 -TV Special
Award
I Guttenberg
Iowa Farm
Bureau County
Awards
$250 each
Ringgold
Howard
Davis
Booth Awards
$50 each
Algona
Clinton County
Dows
Fiscus
Hanlontown
Harlan
Hedrick
LamonlMecalur County
Manilla
Murray
Pioneer Hi -Bred
Awards
$250 each
Rulhven
Maurice
Bristow
Titonka
Sumner
Stone Lake
Lamom
Eddyville
Independence
Sheldon
-1
m"v
*'he Iowa Community
rvlry etc
Betterment OCB) Recognition
Day was held Saturday.
November I at the Iowa
3State
Center in Ames Over
270 awards were presented
in recognition of work done
by Iowa volunteers to
improve their communities.
neighborhoods and
Counties.
In his evening address,
Governor Branslad com-
mended the audience for
their efforts to better their
communBies and noted that
"people are Iowa's most
valuable resource."
A list of Community
Betterment award winners is
Provided below.
Neighborhoods
is' ($500) -Camelot. Council
Bluffs
2nd ($400) -Viet Nam Vets,
Clinton
3rd (S300}Drake. Des
Moines
4th (5200) -Southside,
Council Blulls
5th ($100) -Greenwood. Des
Moines
Honorable Mention (S50)_
Lyons. Clinton
Honorable Mention (S50)_
Hillcrest, Fort Dodge
Communities
Population over 7,500
Ist (S500}Slorm Lake
2nd (5400)-0elweln
3rd ($300) -Creston
4th ($200) -Ankeny
5th ($100) -Boone
Honorable Mention ($50) -
Fort Dodge,
Honorable Mention (S50) -
Marion
Population 4,000-7,500
1st ($500) -Harlan
2nd ($400) -Independence
31d ($300) -Sheldon
41h (S2DD)-De Will
51h (5100}Maquokela
Honorable Mention ($50)_
Algona
Honorable Mention ($50) -
Hampton
Population 2,400-4,000
Isf ($500;i- -SOC City
2nd ($400> -Eldora
3rd (5300) -Clarion
41h (S200}Lamoni
51h ($I00) -Grundy Center
Honorable Mention (S50> -
Story City
Honorable Mention (S50}
Guttenberg
Population 1,200-2,400
Isf ($500)-Hoislein
2nd ($400) -Sumner
3rd (5300) -Ida Grove
41h ($2M -Corydon
i 5th (SI00)-Avoca
Honorable Mention (S50)_
Greene
Honorable Mention (S50) -
Stuart
Population 700-1,200
Ist (S500}Cows
2nd (S400)--Goldlield
i 3rd ($300> -Manilla
j 41h ($200)-Riceville
51h (SI00)-Rulhven
Honorable Mention (S50)-
Riverside
S50)-
Riverside
Honorable Mention ($SO}
Eddyville
Population 400-700
Ist (5500}Radclrlle
2nd ($400}Hawkeye
31d ($300)-Tllonka
4th (S200> -Charlotte
5111 ($100) -Russell
Honorable Mention ($50) -
Lost Nation
Honorable Mention (S50}
Grand Mound
Population 0-400
Is[ 0500}Hanlonlown
2nd ($400}Fiscus
3rd ($300}Grallon
4th (5200}Beaman
5th IS 100}Low 1
5th ($100}Maurice Tie
Honorable Mention (S50} I
Bristow
Honorable Mention (S50)-
Rose
S50)-
Rose Hill
Youth
Population over 5,000
ISI (S200}I01,10 Falls Youth
2nd (SIM -Harlan Youth
3rd ($100) -Ankeny Youth
Honorable Mention -Council
Bluffs Youth -City Slickers
Honorable Mention -Algona
Population 825-5,000
1st (S200)_West Marshall
Youth
2nd ($150}Hubbard Youth
31d (5100) -Hedrick Youth
Honorable Mention -Nora
Springs Youth
Honorable Mention -Greene
Youth
PoPulation 0-825
lsl (5200> -Murry Youth
2nd (Sl50)-0We Youth
31d (S1o0)-bows Youth
Honorable Mention-
Fonlanelle Youth
Honorable Mention -Hames
city Youth
W01 -TV Special
Award
I Guttenberg
Iowa Farm
Bureau County
Awards
$250 each
Ringgold
Howard
Davis
Booth Awards
$50 each
Algona
Clinton County
Dows
Fiscus
Hanlontown
Harlan
Hedrick
LamonlMecalur County
Manilla
Murray
Pioneer Hi -Bred
Awards
$250 each
Rulhven
Maurice
Bristow
Titonka
Sumner
Stone Lake
Lamom
Eddyville
Independence
Sheldon
-1
m"v
I
iNorkshops Announced
\ •The Main Street Iowa pro_
t.-�I;\S11tg-I- Aram is sponsonn
application w A three
workshops
Ing December. The work-
rk-
shops will concentrate on
E the Main Street Approach to
Ea downtown revitalization and application criteria for the
Program.
The Main Street Approach
relies on a partnership
between the public and prt.
vale sectors of a community,
The Approach emphasizes
I
our main elements that
contribute to a towns Iola]
image: _ organization. pro.
motion, desrgn and eco-
nomic restructurinA These
lour elements together pro-
vide abalanced and Practi-
cal method for developing
a Positive image of the
downtown.
Minimum requirements to
Participate in the Main
Street Iowa program
include, a population or
S. to 50,Op0, a guarantee
to employ a tuIII a Main
Street project manager, and
a strong commltmenl of
local private/public support
for the Male Street
APProach.
Dales and locations of the
workshops are as follows:
Decembarl7—Indianola
Warren County Brenton Bank
515 N. Jefferson (Hwy, 65
&69 W)
December I8—Oelwein
Oelwein Chamber of Com-
merce (meeting room)
9 First S. W,
December 19_Stozm Lake
Buena Vida College
(Slebens ForJ.rin)
Workshops wBI begin at
1 p.rn, and continue
11
0
U 4.00 p,m. For more
Wrmation. Contact The
Main
Street Iowa Program
at 515 281.7972.
The following
sponsors made
over $18,000 in
award money
available:
ANR Pipeline Co.(12)
American Legion of Iowa
Casey's General Stores (3)
Continental Telephone Co.
44
..
(10)
Deere and Company (8)
Des Moines Register (3)
Heritage Communication (2)
Iowa AssociallOn of Electric
Cooperatives (16)
Iowa Bankers Association
-.•;i:-3
Iowa Electric Light and
y
�-
Power (12) I
Iowa Farm Bureau Federa-
�¢"
tion (8)
t Coa*11MOLs Gas and Electric l
1
lowa-Mlssoun central Tele-
Phone Co. (14)
��
Iowa Public Service
` '�
Iowa Southern UtWties
�i
COrn-
Northern Gas
Company (16)
People's Natural Gas
Company (16)
.;'
United Telephone Company
of Iowa (11)
ural
------------
Homecoming $86
Awards
5100 each
Centerville
P
Dows
Guthrie Center
+'r<
Iowa Falls
Lake Mills
RadclWe
i
i it
City of Iowa City _1
MEMORANDUM
Date: December 17, 1986
To: Members, City Council and Planning and Zoning Commission, Steve Atkins,
Don Schmeiser, Doug Boothroy, and Karin Franklin
From: Richard J. Boyle, First Assistant City Attorney ' 1
Re: Development Exactions 1
The attached memorandum results from questions raised regarding open space
dedications and charging new development for some of the cost of the new waste-
water treatment plant. It is intended as a review of the current state of the law
regarding development exactions, and to provide a general framework for reviewing
proposals made from time to time. Although there are few Iowa authorities on the
subject, the conclusions are based upon a fairly broad range of authorities from
other jurisdictions. Nationally, commentators generally appear to be in agreement
that the standards discussed in this memorandum will be applied in jurisdictions
in which the issues have not yet been decided.
Exactions, as used in this memorandum, are what developers pay in order to develop
property. Exactions include impact fees (either in the forth of connection or
tap -on fees, or as contributions to a fund for specific improvements off-site of a
particular development); or dedication of public improvements (street, sewers,
etc.); or dedication of land for public improvements such as parks, or fees in
lieu of such dedication.
The memorandum concludes that certain exactions, beyond those we already have such
as on-site streets and sewers, would be allowable in Iowa if the City Council pro-
vides for them by ordinance, and they meet certain minimum standards such as:
1. The exaction must be reasonable in amount.
2. The exaction must be obtained for a specific need resulting from the develop-
ment.
3. Banking for vague future needs is not permissible.
4. New developments cannot be charged for the cost to bring existing facilities
up-to-date, only for their share of new facilities which are up-to-date.
5. Fees collected must be kept in separate accounts to be used only for a spe-
cific improvement benefitting the development, not for general public needs.
6. Fees must be used within a reasonable time after collection, probably no more
than 5-7 years.
With respect to the specific question regarding sewer connection charges to re-
cover the cost of excess capacity from new users, it is my opinion that such an
extraction could legally be imposed. It would, of course, require a careful
segregation of the portion of the overall cost to be recouped, coupled with con-
sideration of the impact such fees would have on future development in the City,
would be happy to discuss this memorandum with any of you at any time.
41
DEVELOPMENT CONTROLS
LAND DEDICATIONS, IMPROVEMENTS AND EXACTIONS
Richard J. Boyle
First Assistant City Attorney
December 1986
DEVELOPMENT CONTROLS
LAND DEDICATIONS, IMPROVEMENTS AND EXACTIONS
Subdivision and other development regulations are the primary tools through
which municipalities affect the quality of residential development in a
community by increasing the likelihood that developments will be completed
and that adequate infrastructure will be available. Minimum standards for
improvements aid in avoiding low-grade subdivisions, and give developers
predictability as to up -front costs so they can better plan the development.
The quality aspect does, however, implicate a major concern - cost - because
developers can be expected to attempt to pass all development expenses on to
lot buyers.
Studies have shown that municipalities cannot afford to extend basic services
to residential developments in the hope that tax revenues will recoup the
cost, but attempts to pass all infrastructure costs to developers may raise
the spectre of exclusionary land use regulation. Clearly, if such costs are
too high, they will have the effect of raising the cost of housing beyond the
means of low and moderate income persons. The policy implications involved
in allocating such costs are beyond the scope of this memorandum, but the
legal implications are not. While regulations which increase the cost of
housing beyond the means of low and moderate income persons may not violate
G/
2
the United States Constitution (if they are not enacted with motive or intent
to excludel), readers should be aware that the matter is not moot. The New
Jersey courts, for example, in the so-called "Idt. Laurel I and II" cases,2
found violations where exclusionary effect was found (even absent improper
motive), and have taken the lead in requiring opportunities for low income
housing in new developments.3
This memorandum is intended to provide a framework for decisions relating to
Vt
development exactions, whether or not imposed as part of the subdivision
3"Aprocess.
r
The first section will briefly describe the history of subdivision
-)
regulation, In Section II the purpose of exactions will be described. Sec-
x
y .l1
tion III will outline the categories of exactions, Section IV will be a legal
bM?
analysis of exactions, and Section V will summarize our conclusions.
'•'
I. A Brief History.4
+`..
Regulation of the subdivision of land dates from well before the year 1900.
i
For example, the Iowa Code Annotated indicates that Iowa's first
°f
.i
platting/subdivision act was contained in the 1873 Code of Iowa. Early
platting acts were adopted to ensure that adequate and accurate engineering
data would be supplied to owners and recorders of deeds, and that streets and
roads would be laid out propprly.5
However, during the land boom in the late 1800s and early 1900s, many large
tracts were subdivided without adequate provision for essential services, and
some people occupied lots in developments lacking those services, while other
lots remained unsold and eventually wound up in tax sales. Assessment pro-
s
3
jects to provide the services were impractical because of the large number of
undeveloped lots, so local governments were required to issue bonds to cover
the costs, thereby shifting the burden to other landowners. In turn, because
of the increased bond repayment obligations, and a diminishing tax base,
many local governments defaulted on their bonds, thereby contributing, at
least in part, to the Great Depression.6
6:7h
In the late 1920s, emphasis began to be placed on subdivision regulation as a
r:
public policy tool for assuring proper standards of land development and
community growth. To that end, in 1928 the United States Department of
Commerce published the Standard City Planning Enabling Act, which thereafter
became the model for a number of states' platting/subdivision laws, including
Iowa's. Among other things, the Act contained provisions for developer
~r „
installed and paid for improvements.
,.
In response to the financing problems ,and using the Standard City Planning
f: l
Enabling Act as a model, many state legislatures adopted additional require-
S.I
ments regarding improvements, specifying those improvements which the sub -
i
divider must install before final plat approval or, in lieu of such
,t
_4
installation before approval, requiring a bond with surety or other guarantee
to secure to the city actual construction of the improvements,
That phase of subdivision regulation apparently peaked after World War II,
when explosive growth led to new subdivision regulations.
One major objective of the post-war subdivision -control legislation
in land -subdivision
has been to avoid some of the costly mistakes
which accompanied the real estate boom of the 1920s. Hence,
to
practice
major emphasis was placed on the power to require land subdividers
improvements required to
install and pay for the street and utility
make new subdivisions reasonably habitable.8
G�
a
I
—t
Since the immediate post-war years, municipalities have expanded the scope of
improvements developers must provide to include parks and schools.9.
In a basic sense, improvement requirements are imposed in part to assure
adequate infrastructure and in part to ensure that the development does not
present environmental hazards.10
Subdivision control laws have generally withstood legal challenge,ll although
Nl
''
1
the legality of requirements that developers install certain improvements and
dedicate streets and sidewalks has not been passed on by the United States
Supreme Court. A 1928 Michigan case, _Ridgefield Land Co. v Detroit,12 is
of
typical it its analysis. There the court sustained a requirement that, as a
prerequisite to plat approval, there be certain setbacks and that an
extra -wide street be dedicated to the public. The court said the power to
?`
require q re those conditions is based upon the theories (1) that development is
a
privilege, (2) that dedication is voluntarily made in return for that advan-
tage and privilege of subdividing, and (3) that under the police power the
s;
i
City may require installation of streets meeting minimum widths needed to
ensure public safety.
tiI;J
*`
The privilege theory of support for subdivision regulations has
generally
fallen into disrepute among legal scholars because it is based upon an as-
sumption that, absent government approval, a landowner has no inherent right
to develop his land, while, in truth, landowners have an intrinsic legal
right to develop, and in jurisdictions with no subdivision controls, the
government cannot impinge on the developer's right.
I
—t
5
GI
is also false. That theory justifies a regulation
The voluntary act premise
that the businessperson voluntarily entered the business and
on the basis
regulation by abstaining from the business. However, a
could have avoided the
merely because one could abstain frau engag
regulation is not constitutional
The regulation must still be reasonable and
ing in the regulated conduct.
in most jurisdictions
must still promote the public welfare. Moreover,
prior municipal approval are mandatory, so the
p
subdivision platting and
>I
voluntariness aspect is missing from the act of subdividing.
requirements are now generally evaluated as
Subdivision regulations and
authorize municipalities to u tory ower
se regulatherefore,
police power measure s which
Exactions are,
to mitigate adverse impacts of development.13
only
pursuant to which developers may be required to pay
regulatory measures
the community by their developments.
for the additional burdens placed upon
II. Purposes of Exactions.
that adequate infrastructure is in place
Exactions may be imposed to assure
hazards, and to control
for occupants of the land, to prevent environmental
development not only determines the character of an area
growth. Real estate
existing public facilities
for indefinite time; it also imposes burdens on
the land.
o support the planned
new facilities tuse of
and often requires
One court has noted that
impact upon the
The subdivision of land has a definite economic
of subdivision activities as
and
municipality and hence the regulation
which the interests of the public
as a means by ratected. Since the
been sustained
which are
the general taxpayer may be safeguarded and protected.
the need for local
developer of land creates siconsidered reasonable
benefit to the subdivision, alit and the
the municipality
of special
that he should bear the cost rather than
general tax payer.14
GI
q
And as other commentators have said -
integral part dofithensubdivisionntprocess,requirements
affectingand
theguarantees are an
den tial develompent, the cost of housing, the goflthe
structure
ment industry, and the fiscal welfare of the develop-
community.15
Subdivision codes and ordinances
now commonly provide that, before final plat
approval,
developers shall either install,
or provide a bond to ensure com-
pletion of, sewer and water lines, streets,
and sidewalks to serve the land
being developed (i.e.,
on-site improvements). For example, Iowa Code (1985)
sec.
409.5 provides that cities may require subdividers to
j
bring streets to
grade,
and may also require installation of sidewalks, paving, sewers,
water, gas and electric utilities before
u,{
i
the plat is approved.... In
lieu of the completion of such improvements and utilities
the final approval
prior to
of the plat, the council... may accept a bond with
surety to secure to the city the actual
construction...
The
Iowa City Subdivision Regulations implement that
authorization.l6
;,.
As noted above, throughout the United States
since World War I there have
been substantial changes in
the manner by whichpublic improvements are paid
for.
i
In earlier days, the assessment process was used. But that
was cumber -
some at best and, when developments
were not successful, a burden on the
public
purse, so municipalities began to require as part of the subdivision
approval process17 that developers provide and for
pay the on-site improve-
ments, and off-site improvements were
j,
provided either by assessment,18 or as
part of cities,
capital improvements projects. Then, as many cities began to
feel the fiscal pinch caused by rapid growth, higher borrowing costs,
and
reduced revenue sources, they began to shift
responsibility for off=site
facilities from public
revenue sources to developers by use of exactions or
development fees.
q
1
7
Development exactions are the required construction of physical
improvements, dedication of land, or fees in lieu of construction or
dedication that municipalities require from aOeveloper as a condi-
tion of approving the building of the project.
That is, exactions are what developers pay - either through construction of
Public improvements such as roads and sewers, or by payment of in -lieu fees,
or connection charges, or impact fees, in order to develop property.
In faster growing areas of the United States, such as Florida and California,
in-kind exactions for off-site facilities have been found to be administra-
tively cumbersome and often inequitable, so municipalities in those jurisdic-
tions have shifted to systems of development fees,20
Development fees are exactions which are -
charges against new development for the purpose of raising money to
defray the costs of basic services local government provides toits
citizens. * * * Fees fund the construction or acquisition % new
capital facilities rather than paying for operational expenses.
Typically, an exaction is paid in return for subdivision approval, the grant-
ing of a special or conditional use permit, a rezoning, or some other neces-
sary land use approval or permit. That is, somewhere in the permitting
process a developer dedicates land or pays some amount which the municipality
uses to provide new public facilities. In any event, "It is a condition of
carrying forward a project."ZZ
Aside from legal considerations or issues they raise, this memorandum will
not specifically address the policy issues which off-site exactions raise,
such as the underlying premise "that established residents have no responsi-
bility for facilities for new residents of a city, even though established
residents had much of their infrastructure financed for them by previous
41
1.1
generations."23 We would note, however, that while exactions may raise
money needed to offset some, if not all, costs imposed on a community by
development, they are typically going to be passed through by the developer,
thereby raising the cost of development, with a consequent slowing of growth
or exclusion of so-called less desirable development, such as low-income,
high-density housing.24
Another underlying purpose of exactions may be to assist in the timing and
sequence of development by controlling the installation of public services.
Although the United States Supreme Court has not ruled on the question, in
the seminal opinion, Golden v. Town of Ramapo,25 the New York Court of Ap-
peals sustained phased growth plans and ordinances adopted to eliminate
premature subdivision and urban sprawl, even though some land might not be
developed for as long as eighteen years. The court accepted the Town's
position that its purposes - to prevent urban blight - were consistent with
police power objectives. The Ramapo scheme was sustained because the Town
had developed a comprehensive plan which it implemented through zoning,
subdivision controls, and its capital improvements budget. A similar result
might be achieved in other municipalities by coordinating zoning, subdivision
controls, exactions, and capital improvements programs.
61
9
III. Categories of Exactions.
There are various types of exactions.
A. In-kind contributions within a project. These include, for example,
streets, sidewalks, and water and sewer lines. The category may also
include parkland dedication.
B. In-kind contributions outside, but near, the project. Examples of this
kind of exaction include construction or rehabilitation of streets and
highways bordering, crossing, or existing near the project, and extension
of water and sewer mains and storm drains that pass through and extend
out from the subdivision to serve others.
C. Money payments in -lieu of in-kind contributions. This category includes
payments which are made in place of land dedications for improvements
such as parks.
0. Impact fees. These fees are collected to provide infrastructure off-site
but not clearly associated geographically or functionally with a project.
Impact fees are often connection charges,26 and have been used to pro-
vide, among other things, water and sewer systems,27 parks,28 and
roads.29 Impact fees are normally levied when the building permit is
issued.30
4
10
E. Linkage Programs, Several municipalities, including Boston, San
Francisco, Santa Monica, Seattle; Miami; Hartford and Princeton Township;
have adopted programs to require developers to provide housing facilities
in exchange for development permits.31 That is, based on the size of the
development, the developer must provide either a specified amount of
housing, or money sufficient to provide that amount of housing.
Boston, for example, developers of large commercial In
or industrial pro•
jects are required to pay a fee of $6 per square foot of floor space over
100,000 square feet to finance construction of low- and moderate -intone
housing and job training for the unemployed. The theory underlying these
programs is that office and other commercial developments displace resi-
dential facilities, that there is a need for downtown residences, both
for office workers and others, that need is exacerbated
commercial deveby office and
lopment, so the developer should be required to provide
the housing. The legality of linkage programs is still
However, a in question.
trial court recently invalidated the Boston program on the
grounds that the City did not have statutory authority to enact such a
program, but the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court overruled that
decision and a California court has sustained the San Francisco
program. 32 In any event, this type of exaction only works in large, fast
growing areas.
IV. Legal Analysis.
In considering exactions, it is always important to heed the words of Mr,
Justice Holmes, who warned that "a strong public desire to improve the public
condition is not enough to warrant achieving the desire by a shorter cut than
-t
c.
11
the constitutional way of paying for the change.03 As one court commented
when discussing the fact that a municipality could use exactions to impose
upon developers a disproportionate share of the burden of paying for addi-
tional services, "To tolerate the situation would be to allow an otherwise
acceptable exercise of police power to become grand theft."34
In order for any exaction to be valid, all of the following legal tests must
be satisfied:
-The municipality must have authority to impose the exaction.
-The exaction must be a regulatory fee rather than an illegal tax.
-The exaction must be reasonable.
iV -The exaction must satisfy equal protection requirements.
A. Authority.
Developer exactions must be authorized by the laws of the state in which
a municipality is located,35 and must be administered pursuant to local
ordinance establishing standards for determining when exaction require-
ments will apply.36 Authorization may be derived from state statute, or
directly or impliedly under home rule power.
41
C
12
In Iowa, subdivision regulations are found �"
relating to plats. Section 409.1q Iowa Code Chapter 409
Provides, among other things, that,
upon examination by a city council,
If such plats shall conform to the statutes of
Ordinances of such city, and if they shall
general plan for such cit the state and
had for public streets, alleys, extensions fall within the
service Ys, parks thereof, regard being
duty of said councservil and other [planning]
ciesewer connections 9
[plannin then it shall �beathe
approval upon plats submitted gl comnission to endorse their
council may require as a condition�op provided
that the owner,,,com 1 approval that the city
in regard to installationW7 such other reasonable reser Plats
ments, as the council May public utilities, or other improves
the public interest. y deem requisite for the protection of
Code Section 409,5 clearly says that on-site exactions for paving, sew-
ers, water, gas, and electric utilities are
suggests that the language of Code Sec, authorized, Cunningham
409,14, requiring consideration
Of parks would support imposition of a parkland dedication ordinance,37
However, another Iowa commentator disagrees.38 However, in-kind exac-
tions and in -lieu fees have been found to be u
authority v or outside the
That of municipalities acting under state laws similar to Iowa's,39
is, without specific authorization, such exactions have been beyond
the authority of the municipalities.
However, Amendment 25 (1968) to the Iowa Constitution, Art. III, 538A,
provides that cities are granted home rule power and authority not incon-
sistent with the laws of the general assembly,40 The legislature has
defined cities' scope of power as follows:
A city, except as expressly limited by the Constitution
not inconsistent with the laws
exercise any power and of the general assemtil and if
to protect and preserveptheo r{ rights function it deems a priate
the city or of its residents g ' Privileges, and rorerty of
resideace entsfet*,*h*lth, welfare, eomfortPrandrve and eonvenienoeoof ithe
ts
G/
r
13
The Iowa Supreme Court has held that an exercise by a city of home rule
power is not inconsistent with state law unless it is irreconcilable with
such law and that any state law limitation upon a home rule city's power
must be expressly imposed.42 That is, Iowa cities have full police
power, subject only to limitations expressly imposed by the legislature.
In the words of the Texas Supreme Court, "Home rule cities have 'full
power of self-government' and 'look to the acts of the legislature not
for grants of power ... but only for limitations on their powers.'"43
One specific limitation on home rule power in Iowa is that a city may not
impose a tax unless specifically authorized to do so by state law.44 On
the other hand, unless state law provides otherwise, an Iowa home rule
city may set standards which are higher or more stringent than those
imposed by state law.45
The Texas case quoted above is particularly instructive in that regard.
College Station, Texas, a home rule city (and home of Texas A&M Univer-
sity), had enacted an ordinance requiring dedication of park land, or
payment of a fee in -lieu of dedication, as a condition to subdivision
plat approval. In sustaining the requirements, the Court found that the
State subdivision statute merely enumerates some powers, but that it does
not unmistakably limit a home rule city's power to require the exactions.
Similar logic should apply in Iowa. Code Chapter 409, the platting/sub-
division statute, enumerates several powers regarding improvements, but
does not expressly impose any limitations, and additional exactions would
not appear to be inconsistent with the statute. Further, one can argue
41
14
that exactions are standards for subdivision approval, that exactions
beyond those listed in the statute are merely higher standards than those
imposed by the statute, and are therefore, authorized by the terms of the
Code.46
In any event, home rule power appears to provide adequate authority for
exactions other than those enumerated in the State Subdivision Code.
Further, the basic purposes of the large scale development requirements
(City Code Chapter 27) are similar to the subdivision regulation require-
ments,47 so similar rationale should apply to sustain the large scale
development regulations' exactions.
One other point is important regarding water and
tap -on fees. The Iowa Code deals s sewer connection or
Pecifically with rates for city util
ity service -
and expressly provides that:48
The governing body of a city utility
... may:
a. OY ordinance... establish, impose, adjust, and
the collection of charges for connection to a
ity.,,, provide for
city util-
Prior to implementation of home rule, the Code49 specified the method by
which cities could establish sewer connection charges. Presumably pursu-
ant to that authority, North Liberty adopted a sewer tap -on fee ordi-
nance, but the Iowa Supreme Court invalidated the measure on the grounds
that it did not comply with the statutory requirement that a schedule of
fees be set forth in the ordinance.50 The fact that the legislature
repealed the connection fee provision as part of the home rule legisla-
41
01
15
,✓r
tion apparently means that the specific details
for improving connection
fees are a municipal responsibility.
The old law can, however, serve as
a guide if tap -on or
connection (i.e., impact) fees are to be
adopted.
Although the matter is not completely free from
doubt, it appears that
the City has authority under its
home rule power to impose exactions
beyond those set forth in
`j
Chapter 409 - there is no express limitation
upon such requirements
and exactions are not inconsistent with the Code,
B. Fee or Tax.
.rite
As noted above, Iowa law prohibits imposition
x51
of a tax which is not
specifically authorized by the
legislature,51 and there is
no legislative
authority for imposing a tax
on developers. P The question then is whether
an exaction is
a regulatory fee or an illegal tax, The Iowa
Supreme
Court has discussed the
meaning of the term "tax" on numerous
occasions, 52 and in
,•::{
each case clearly articulated a distinction between
tax,
a
which is a charge or levy for general public
r;j
purposes, and an as-
sessment or fee which is
imposed only as a payment for a benefit con-
curred. Indeed in
a case where a city attempted to impose
j
upon a
property owner the Out and labor
I
costs incurred b 1 the city in
providing line installation
and hook-up to the municipal power system of
the City of Indianola,
the Court said the City's charges were
�
not a tax
because they were imposed for a benefit
conferred upon a specific
P
son, 53 ar-
There
are no Iowa cases involving in -lieu fees, buttheration-
ale, that such fee will not be a tax if
I
li
paid for a benefit conferred,
should apply.
,✓r
16
-1
41
Based upon a review of cases involving the fee
versus tax issue,to avoid
having a charge be classified
as a tax, the critical points seem to be
that the fee be for benefit
conferred and that any funds collected must
be
earmarked for and applied to the specific
purpose for which paid. The
cases which hold exactions to be
illegal taxes often turn on the fact
that the funds
were not sufficiently earmarked for
a specific purpose.54
For example, if the fees
are generally available for use in the whole
community, even though their use is limited to
I
capital improvements and
parks, they will be held invalid.
The cases clearly state that the fees
must bep
ke t in
'j
P
separate accounts earmarked for specific improvements and
must either be used within a reasonable time, or refunded.55
'y
C. Reasonableness - Substantive Due Process.
The next consideration is whether the exaction is
reasonable, thereby
satisfying constitutional substantive
due process requirements. Substan-
tive due
ril
process requirements are satisfied when a land
use regulation
Promotes the Public health, safety, and
ii
general welfare. A regulation
serving those
needs will be upheld as a valid exercise of the police
Power. In practice, the concept often merges with "takings" and
equal
protection jurisprudence. 56
One
short analysis of the problem is as
follows 57
f
It has been suggested that the difference between a violation of
substantive due process
II
and a taking is the following: for due
process, there is a tripartite analysis. First, did
ment have
+
the govern-
any public Purpose in doing what it did, i.e. is it
the business of
government to be acting at all?
action violates due If not,he
process. S
Second, if a government
did it select a means which is can act,
Purpose rationally
related to the public
it sought to achieve? If not, the action
cviolates due
Process, even though the
J
I
government could act if it selected an
41
11
41
appropriate means. Third, if government had a public purpose in
acting and chose a
proper means, is the resultant public benefit
commensurate with the private loss caused by its
action? If the
essviseloss is than the benefitdue
eventif
violated governmenr tuhadcapublic�purposeandoc-
rthe
means chosen were appropriate to achieve
that public purpose.
While an action which meets those three tests does not violate
due
process, if the private loss resulting from the government
action, as compared with the value
of the property before the
action (not as compared with the public benefit) is too
great,
then the action will constitute a taking. Haley, Balancing
Private Loss Against Public Gain
to Test for a Violation of Due
Process or a Taking Without Just Compensation, 54 Wash.
315 (1919). L. Rev.
Land use regulations carry a strong presumption of validity which is
overcome only by showing that there is no fairly debatable or reasonable
relationship between the legislative action and the public welfare. 58
`
With respect to accomplishment of a legitimate police
power goal, exac-
tions are generally considered to relate to health, safety or general
-:.
welfare if they are for traditional public services such as streets,
sewers, and schoo15.59 After a period of uncertainty, open space and
parks also seem to fit in that category. In a recent case involving the
open space ordinance of the City of Santa Cruz, California, the court
stated "There is no dispute that open space ordinances of the type in
question here substantially advance legitimate state interests.'60 In-
deed, an infamous 1980 Texas Court of Civil Appeals decisionfi1 holding
that providing parkland was not a legitimate police power goal was con-
sidered for some time to question the trend of cases, but it was over-
ruled by the Texas Supreme Court in 1984.62 To date, at least fifteen
states have sustained parkland dedication ordinances63 so the need for
parks now appears to be clearly established as a legitimate police power
goal ,
41
■
Y
18
The reasonableness of a particular regulation turns on the facts of any
given situation, but courts have developed three different tests to
evaluate exactions.
(1) The Illinois "uniquely attributable" rule was formulated in a 1961
case (Pioneer Trust 8 Savings Bank v. Mt. Prospect64) involving a
school land dedication requirement, and was phrased as follows:
If the burden cast upon the subdivider is specifically and
uniquely attributable to his activity, then the requirement
is permissible; if not, it is forbidden and amounts to a
confiscation of private property in contravention of the
constitutional prohibitions rather than reasonable regula-
tion under the police power.
The Pioneer Trust court invalidated the Mt. Prospect ordinance
because it was not shown that the need for school land was attribut-
able solely to the development in question. However, recent Illi-
nois cases have sustained dedication or in -lieu fee ordinances, even
applying the strict, uniquely attributable test.65
(2) Another formulation of the reasonableness test is the approach of
the California courts, which sustain exactions if they "can be jus-
tified on the basis of a general public need ... caused by present and
future subdivisions."66 That is, there is no need to relate the
exaction to needs generated by any specific development. If the
municipality shows a need for improvements, each subdivision must
pay some share of their cost, even absent proof that a specific
subdivision contributes to that need.
Gr
01
:µNSI
19
(3) The most widely applied test is somewhere between the "uniquely
attributable" and "general public needs" tests, and is usually
referred to as the "rational relationship" or "rational nexus"
(i.e., connection, tie or link) test. The test was first articu-
lated in a 1965 Wisconsin case, Jordan Y. Menomonee Falls,67 involv-
ing an ordinance requiring that subdividers either dedicate a
portion of their land, or pay a fee in lieu thereof, for school,
park, or recreational sites. The plaintiff attacked the ordinance
on three grounds: (1) that the exactions were not authorized by
state law; (2) that the in -lieu payment was an unauthorized tax, and
(3) that the land dedication requirement was unreasonable and was an
unconstitutional taking of property without just compensation.
Plaintiff succeeded in the trial court, but the Wisconsin Supreme
Court reversed and remanded. The Court first noted that the amount
required ($200 per lot) was not challenged. It then found legisla-
tive authorization for the ordinance among the purposes of the
Wisconsin subdivision statute to, among other things, "facilitate
adequate provisions for transportation, water, sewerage, schools,
parks, playgrounds .... "68
In discussing reasonableness, the court accepted the Pioneer Trust
test, if "not so restrictively applied as to cast an unreasonable
burden of proof upon the municipality which has enacted the ordi-
nance under attack."69 The court noted that it might be impossible
to show that an exaction was needed to meet a need solely attribut-
Gr
zo
i
able to a particular development, but that
it might well be able to
show an influx of people over
time had created a need for
more
schools or parks, and went on to state;
tWe cor onclude that a required dedication of land for school,
sites
heksubd vei'siontiplat shouldal
abeauphe diasnafor
Of polite aPProval of
valid
Power if the evidence reasonablyexercise
the municipality will be required
tfor
to proidetmoresland
schools, parks and playgrounds as
the
subdivision. a result of approval of
'±
We do not consider the fact that other residents of the
Village as well as residents
of the subdivision may make
use of a public site required to be dedicated by
for school,
r:
subdivider
park or recreational purposes is particularly
material to the c}nostibetianal issue.
land re56ired This is also true of
dedicated
Purposes. far public street
Although authority for in—lieu fees
was not spelled out in the
statute, the Court believed
such fees were in keeping with the same
Jpurposes
of the statute which sustained the dedication
requirement,
and with the statutory "adequate
provision" language, and pointed
out the
practical reality that if no fee
were required, developers
of parcels too small to
provide land meeting village needs might not
have to
Pay their fair share.71
Subsequently, the majority of courts considering the issue
have
followed the lead of the Wisconsin
court, reasoning as did the Mis.
souri Supreme
Court in Home Builders Assn. v. Cit of Kansas
Citv,72:
[Tjhat the Pioneer Trust rule... is too restrictive and
should be mom'" Wj�
fact that a subdivision merely
threatens to "contribute" to
a community need for open
space should not exempt it from bearing a fair share
burden of
of the
meeting the need. We adopt the following rule in
Missouri as to mandatory dedications
for recreational
Purposes. If the requirement is within the
statutory grant
i
21
of power to the municipality and if the burden cast upon
the subdivider is reasonably attributable to y,
this activit
then the requirement is permissible,- if not, it is forbid-
den and amounts to a confiscation of private property in
contravention of the constitutional ro
than reasonable regulation ,nio,. ,_ _phibitions rather _
At least fourteen other states have adopted the so-called "rational
nexus" test. 73
The second part of the rational nexus test is whether the exaction
is reasonably connected to benefits occurring to the development.
That is, is there a reasonable relationship between the exaction . and the benefit to the people in the development) If the exaction
disproportionate to the benefit, it is an illegal taking. For
example, in a 1969 New York case,74 the court invalidated a require-
ment for dedication of an 80 -foot deep strip of beachfront on the
basis that it was confiscatory because of the disproportionate value
of the strip in relation to the value of the balance of the land. On
the other hand, in 1981 a California appellate court sustained a
requirement that the owner needing a building permit dedicate a
beachfront easement covering about two-thirds of a single, 15,000
square foot lot.75
Many of the leading cases on proportionality are from Florida and
Utah, and they help to define the tests to be applied. In Contrac-
tors 8 Builders Assn. v. Dunedin,76 the issue was the legality of
PIN
impact fees - a water connection fee of $325 per unit, and a sewer
connection fee of $475 per unit. The intermediate court of
appeals77 announced the following standards for reviewing exactions:
[N]here the growth patterns are such that an existing water
or sewer system will have to be expanded in the near fu-
ture, a municipality may properly charge for the privilege
of connecting to the system a fee which is in excess of the
physical cost of connection, if this fee does not exceed a
proportionate part of the amount reasonably necessary to
finance the expansion and is earmarked for this purpose.
Emphasis added.)
The Florida Supreme Court approved the standard, but invalidated the
Dunedin ordinance because the funds collected were not sufficiently
earmarked for expenditures for water and sewer system expansion. The
City subsequently revised its ordinance to meet the objection and
d,
the new ordinance was sustained.78
Subsequent Florida cases have sustained the validity of the Dunedin
test. In Hollywood, Inc. v. Broward County,79 the court sustained a
park land acquisition ordinance which provided for either (1) dedi-
cation of land at a rate of three acres per 1,000 residents, (2) a
fee in lieu of dedication, equal in value to three acres, or (3) an
impact fee in accordance with the schedule of fees set forth in the
ordinance.
In Home Builders E Contractors' Assn. v. Board of County Com'rs. of
Palm Beach County,80 the court sustained an impact fee ordinance
which required any new land development activity to pay a fair share
of road expansion needed because of development. The County's
comprehensive plan recognized that local growth would necessitate
substantial road improvements to maintain a constant level of road
�r
23
service. Based upon historical data, the ordinance divided
the
county into 40 zones, contained a formula to calculate fees based
upon costs of roads and the number of trips new development
would
generate, required that the money be put into separate trust funds
for each zone, and that it be utilized within six
years or repaid.
The important point to note about this
case is that the County was
able to demonstrate the reasonableness of its exactions because
-,
it
had done an extensive use and cost analysis of the road system.
The Utah Supreme Court has developed a test similar to that
applied
in Florida. In Banberry Dev. Co v South Jordan City,81 the Court
formulated the proportionality test in the following manner:
[To] comply with the standard of reasonableness, a munici-
pal fee related to
services like water and sewer must not
require newly developed properties to bear
more than their
equitable share of the capital costs in relation to benefit
conferred.
To determine the equitable share of the capital costs to be
borne by newly developed
properties, a municipality should
determine the relative burdens previously borne and
be borne by to
s
yet
those properties in comparison with the other
properties in the municipality as
a whole; the fee in
question should not exceed the amount sufficient to equal -
ize the relative
burden s of newly developed and other
properties.
Among the most important factors the municipality should
consider in determining the
relative burden already borne
and yet to be bornedeveloped
bfol
Properties are propertiesother
the lowing he
hof
cost
existing capital facilities; (2) the manner of financing
existing capital facilities (such as
user charges, special
assessments, bonded indebtedness, general taxes, or federal
grants); (3) the
relative extent to which the newly devel-
oped properties and the other
properties in the municipal-
ity have already contributed
facilitieto the cost of existing
s (by means such as user charges, special assess-
ments, or payments from proceeds
of general taxes); (4) the
relative extent to which the newly developed and the other
properties in
the municipality will contribute to the cost
24
of existing capital facilities in the future; (5) the
extent to which the newly developed properties are entitled
to a credit.
The credit referred to in (5) would apply when a developer provided
facilities previously furnished by the community. The court also
suggested consideration should be given to the time -price differen-
tial inherent in the fact that payments are made at different times,
as well as any extraordinary costs of servicing the new development.
Presumably, the time -price differential could be handled by adjust-
ing the fees from time to time to reflect carrying costs.
Regardless of how a proportionality test is formulated, the courts
will look for what in essence is a cost -accounting justification for
VY exaction and if that is lacking, there is a very good chance the
exaction will be invalidated. For example, the Utah court has
applied the rational nexus test on at least two occasions to invali-
date ordinances. In Lafferty v. Payson the court invali-
dated impact and connection fees because the funds were deposited in
the general fund of the City. There was no showing of a rational
nexus between the fees and the cost of improving a specific munici-
pal service or of a specific capital expenditure.
In Patterson V. Alpine Cit
83 the court invalidated an ordinance
imposing a sewer connection fee that was originally set at $100, was
to go to $1,000 one month later and $1,500 two months later. The
fees had no relationship to the cost of providing the service.
6r
25
Thus, the rational nexus test has three parts - there must be some
showing that a particular development will create a need for expan-
sion of public facilities, the amount of the exaction must not
exceed a proportionate part of the amount reasonably necessary to
finance the expansion needed to accommodate the new users of the
system, and the fees must be earmarked for the purpose for which
they are collected.
As noted above, the "need" aspect is generally satisfied if the
exaction relates to traditional public services and facilities such
as streets, sewers, water, parks and schools.84 Nevertheless, it is
essential that municipalities demonstrate a specific need for the
facilities for which the exaction is required. Community growth
rate, traffic counts, water or sewage facility capacities and usage,
park usage figures, and national average recommended amounts of park
land, are examples of the types of data which have been used to
support exactions.
Further, the land or fee must be intended for an imminent public
use, and not "banked" for some unspecified future use.85 In fact,
required reservations of land have not been well received in the
courts because they often have no national nexus to the particular
development.88 Reservation means that land is restricted by cove-
nant or easement to a particular future public use, such as for a
street, but is not dedicated or improved. Assuming statutory and
ordinance authorization for reservations one, will be sustained only
if limited in scope and duration, and if it has a recognized nexus
tor
e
F
26
f"
to the proposed subdivision.87 Cases involving required
reserva-
tions of land without compensation, for
an indefinite time, in order
to
accommodate a planned relocation of
a road, found those require-
ments unconstitutional because
of the indefiniteness of duration
of
the reservation, the fact that no other
use would be permitted, and
because there
was no clear nexus to the subdivision.88
ti
Once need is established, it is important that there be
a showing of
the relationship between the
exaction and the share of overall need
contributed by a
t�!
particular development.
pm Is the share of the
,+
need
contributed by the development reflected by the
amount
tion? For example, if
an arterial street serves hedevelopment,
a
developer should only be required to
contribute an amount of
right-of-way limited to the
i
amount of traffic projected to use the
w
street which is generated by the development,89 As
an example of an
overreaching exaction demand,
in Liberty v, California Costal
the court held that while a city could require a restau-
rant owner to provide parking for his customers, it
could not also
require him to provide parking for adjacent beach users
and patrons
of other restaurants. To do
so would be a taking property
of with
j
out just compensation.
It should be noted that some courts appear to have drawn
a'j
:
a bright
line distinction between on-site and off-site needs,
`!
and while they
may approve an exaction for roads transecting development,
a they
will not
approve an exaction for roads on the fringes.91
This dis-
tinction does not appear to be supported by the logic of the
reason -
f"
1
1
27
ableness tests, and the decision may be attributable to lack
of
proof that the need for the exaction is caused by the
specific
development rather than to a principled objection to
off-site exac-
tions. The need will be there whether the facility is
on- or
off-site.
Finally,as another aspect of showing need, failure to
provide that
the collected fees be kept aside from general funds, and
applied or
used within a reasonable time, can be fatal to an ordinance.
r;
i
The
Arkansas Supreme Court recently invalidated a parkland
exaction
ordinance where it was not demonstrated that the municipality had
a
specific plan to spend the funds, so the Court could not
s;
ascertain
whether the funds would be spent for the benefit
of the develop-
92
,i
men t. The court might also have invalidated the exaction
as an
illegal tax.
One other point should be noted. While the vast majority of the
exaction cases are from state courts, Federal courts also get into
the fray and the implications of that involvement are important,
although somewhat unclear at this time. For example, in Parks
v.
Watson,93 the court considered a case from the City Of Klamath
Falls, Oregon. The plaintiff had asked for rezoning of his land and,
-
apparently, the land was rezoned without conditions to permit con-
struction of 214 garden apartments. In conjunction with the
`.`
re
quest, however, the City was asked to vacate some paper (i.e.,
platted but unopened) streets. During negotiations on the street
vacations, plaintiff was asked to dedicate a strip of land for
28
widening of a city street adjacent to his property, The strip
contained a geothermal well from which plaintiff planned to obtain
steam to provide heat for the apartments. He offered an easement
over the land to allow widening of the street, but refused to convey
rights to the geothermal well. The City wanted the well so it could
provide heat to the public generally, and refused to vacate the
streets unless plaintiff conveyed the well. Plaintiff filed a
Section 196394 action, and the district court granted the City's
motion for summary judgment, The Court of Appeals reversed, finding
valid claims under the takings, due process and equal protection
clauses of the Constitution. The Court said it could find no ra-
tional relationship between the geothermal well dedication require-
ment and the purpose underlying the law on street vacations. It
said the lack of rational nexus can give rise to valid claims under
Sec. 1983.
As noted in an article co -written by one leading land use lawyer, 95
every exaction case can now become a Sec. 1983 case, subjecting
municipalities to both damages and attorney's fees if an exaction is
invalidated. Previously, the remedy was mere invalidation of the
ordinance and return to the developer of the property or money
exacted, with no attorneys' fee awarded.
al
■
29
In summary, Iowa courts would probably apply the rational nexus test
to exactions, and that test requires:
1. That the need to be met by the exaction be, to a measurable
degree, caused by the development.
2. That the exaction not exceed the developer's fair or proportion-
ate share of the cost of meeting the need generated by the
devel opment.
D. Equal Protection.
Another challenge to exactions, particularly impact fees, may be based
upon the Constitutional mandate of the Equal Protection Claus=_ of the
Fourteenth Amendment that no State shall "deny to any person within its
jurisdiction equal protection of the laws...." That "is essentially a
direction that all persons similarly situated should be treater alike."
City of Cleburne, Tex. Y. Cleburne Living Center.96 As the Cou^t noted
in that case,97
The general rule is that legislation is presumed to be valid and
will be sustained if the classification drawn by the statute- is
rationally related to a legitimate state interest. * * * Ynen
social or economic legislation is at issue, the Equal Protection
Clause allows the states wide latitude, * * * and the constitu-
tion pres ones that even improvident decisions will eventually be
rectified by the democratic process.
GI
30
Statutes which classify on the basis of suspect classifications, such as
race, alienage, national origin, or gender, or on the basis of a funda-
mental right (e.g., freedom of speech or association) are subject to
strict scrutiny and will be sustained only if they are suitably tailored
to serve a compelling state interest. 98 On the other hand,
where individuals in the group affected by a law have distin-
guishing characteristics relevant to interests the
authority to implement, the courts have been ver
* to closely scrutinize legislative state has
and to what extent choices as y reluctant
cases, the Equal Protectioner�sts should be t0 whether, how
means to serve a g fuse requiresp only In such
le itimate end. y a rational
Few exaction cases have turned on equal protection grounds. Weber
Home Builders Assn, y
RoyCit ,100 involved
increased the building Permit fee from E12 an ordinance which
to ;112 all at once, primarily
to raise revenues and without any cost
Court justification. The Utah Supreme
affirmed the lower court's decision that the ordinance unfairly
denied equal protection where, as opposed to established residents, it
Placed a "disproportionate and unfair" burden on new residents.
Strahan v, city of Aurora,101 involved an ordinance imposing a ;550 water
system connection fee which was expressly waived for all properties with
existing and habitable structures on the date of enactment, so long as
the owner picked up the permit by a certain date. The Ohio court struck
down the ordinance on the grounds, among others, that it was unconstitu-
tionally discriminatory.
An ordinance which
passed the equal protection test was involved in
Ore on State Homebuilders v. City of Ti ard.102
The ordinance imposed a
system development charge (SOC)
for extra capacity street facilities and
4/
M1
31
F
traffic control devices. The SDC rate schedule contained several differ-
ent fees, and for single family homes, the fee was graduated on the basis
of purchase price. The Court had difficulty finding a rational basis for
fees based upon the purchase price of homes, but accepted the proffered
reason, as stated in a resolution the Tigard City Council had adopted
earlier, that it is in the City's interest to encourage development of
reasonably priced single family housing.
In short, although a differential fee structure may be desirable, and
iindeed
may meet equal protection requirements, it is very important that
a municipality clearly articulate the reasons for any differences and,
{
where possible, provide a cost accounting basis for distinctions.
Where a decision is made to make newcomers, but not current residents,
pay exactions, it should be understood that there is no clear trend in
the law. One comentator103 makes the point that if new residents were
not arriving, expansion would not be needed, but on the other hand, it
must also be the case that but for lifelong residents remaining, a system
would not need expanding. The commentator says charging only newcomers
gives preference to those who were there first, "a practice of question-
able validity.11104 On the other hand, the Supreme Court has said "in the
local economic sphere, it is only the invidious discrimination, the
wholly arbitrary act, which cannot stand consistently with the Fourteenth
Amendment.°105
i
F
-1
32
V. Conclusions
-wh
Exactions provide a means to finance the new infrastructure
needed by a com-
munity as a result of the pressures of growth, but they
also raise the price
of development.106 One writer107
cites an example from Colorado Springs,
where ;6,110 in development fees on a ;75,000 house
were marked up by the
developer by 28% to $7,898, so that while the
direct fees totalled only 8.2%
of the sale price, when fully marked up they accounted for 10.5%
of the sale
Price. The article also noted that while all fees
may not be passed on to
l
consumers in highly price sensitive markets, generally they do et
e.l
on.108 9 Passed
`'rtu
In any event, it is our opinion that properly supported exactions for
sewer
and water systems, streets and parks would be upheld by the Iowa
Supreme
Court. Those exactions must, however, at a
minimum:
{:
1. Relate only to the cost of that portion of new facilities required by
growth. They cannot be used to pay for updating or otherwise improving
current facilities, so the City must have plans in place to remedy from
funding sources other than exactions any present service level deficien-
cies.
2. Be based upon up-to-date population estimates, costs, and service levels.
It is not reasonable to impose only on newcomers costs of expanded serv-
ice and the City has the burden of establishing the reasonableness of
any
exactions it may impose.
-wh
e:!
33
3. Be in an amount which does not exceed the developer's fair share of the
cost of providing the facilities. If a development will require a lim-
ited portion of the facilities (say 25%), it is unreasonable, hence
illegal, to ask the developer to pay more than that portion (25% in our
example) of the cost of the facilities. Generally, exactions do not
cover even that much.
4. Be earmarked for use within a reasonable time period to provide the
facilities for which they were collected, and kept in separate accounts.
Provision must be made for refunding or returning exactions which are not
used within a reasonable time.
5. Provide developers'with an opportunity for a hearing with respect to the
reasonableness of the amount of the fee applicable to a particular devel-
opment allowing exemptions or modifications if the exaction would be
confiscatory.
41
L
34
FOOTNOTES
1. See Village of Arlington Heights v. Metroplitan Hous. Dev. Corp., 429
U.S. 252, 97 S. Ct. 555, 50 L.Ed.2d 450 (1977).
2. Southern Burlington County NAACP V. Township of Mt. Laurel ("Mt.Laurel
1"), 67 N.J. 151, 180-81, 336 A.2d 713, 728, a ea- dismissed & cert.
denied, 423 U.S. 808 (1975); Southern Burlington oun y f V.
own-
STIp of Mt. Laurel ("Mt. Laurel II"), 92 N.J. 158, 456 A.2d 390
(1983) .
3. M. Schultz and R. Kelley, Subdivision Improve ent Re uirements and
Gurantees: A Primer, 28 J. Urban Contem L.
ereinafter cite as "Schultz & Kelley"), p 13-1 n. 34 (1985),
4. .Sources for the information found in this section are R. Cunningham,
se Control - The
Land UState and Land Pro rams, 50 Iowa L. Rev. 367,
4 5 1965 (ereina ter cite as "Cunning am and Schultz 8 Kelley,
supra, note 3.
5. Schultz & Kelley, supra, note 3, at 29.
6. Id at 7-8.
7. Iowa Code (1985) Sec. 409.5.
8. Cunningham, supra, note 4, at 416; Schultz Y. Kelley, supra, note 3, at
9.
9. Schultz & Kelley, supra note 3, at 9-10.
10. Id at 30.
11. Id at 31.
12, 241 Mich. 468, 217 N.W. 58 (1928). Accord, Ayres v. City of Los
Angeles, 34 Cal.2d 31, 207 P.2d 1, 5 (1949); Brous Y. Smith, 304 N.Y.
164, 106 N.E.2d 503, 109 N.Y.S.2d 289 (1952).
13. Schultz & Kelley, supra note 3, at 31, n. 151.
14. Blevins v. City of Manchester, 103 N.H. 294, 170 A.2d 121, 122-23
(1961).
15. Schultz & Kelley, supra, note 3, at 6.
16. Iowa City Code of Ordinances Chapter 32. (Hereinafter cited as "City
Code".) p
17. Compare Iowa Code (1985) Sec. 409.5 with City Code Chapter 32.
18. E.g., City Code, Sec. 32-40(g).
35
41
19. D. Conners and C. Meacham, Pa in the Pi er: what Lan wuol ��•
1986 Inst.
Domain n ition of (South est Lega7lFoundati n), Sec•
ments Re ulonins
andoEminent
Plan ning, gHereinafter cited as "Conners and Meacham.")
2-2.
2.01, p.
T. Snyder and M. Stegman, Pa in for Growth: Using Development Fees o
1986) 181, Hereinafter
2p,
Finance Infrastructure (Urban Land Institute,
cited as Snyder and Stegman".)
Associated with Draftin Im act
21. Currier, Le al and Practical Problems Domain
1984 I Inst.
274 (hereinafteronc ted asd"Currier")nent
Fee Ordinances,
V. g
Meacham, su ra note 19, Sec. 2.02[1], p. 2 4.
22. Conners and
23, Snyder and Stegman, supra note 20, at 183.
24. See e.g., Southern Burlington County NAACP v. Township of Mt. Laurel,
Township of Madison, 72 N.J. 48 ,
supra; Oakwood at Madison, Inc. v. .
371 A.2d 1192, 1206, 1208, 1211-13
510-14, 520-23,
34 Stdd294. (I---09
138 72),
';.
ssocdat d Home
25. �OSN' 5.5Ct. 43629343L. Ed.
10033593
Livermore, 8 Cal.
Builders City7of Sao Diego, 157 Cal. APP.
(1976). ComareJCosa V.
Cal. Rptr. 580 (1984).
d
3rd 745, 203
Coulter d/b/a Stage Coach Apts. v. Rawlins, 662 P.2i 886 (Co.,
Assn. of Pinellas Co.,
26. E.g.,
1gg3); City of Dunedin v. Contractors & Builders
Dev. Co. v. South Jordan City,
1978) , Banberry
35
63 1 P 2dd8996((Fla 1961)
City of Walnut
27. Associated Nome Builders of Greater East Bay, Inc. V.
Rptr. 630, 484 P.2d 606 (Cal.), a
-.
Creek, 4 Cal. 3rd 633, 94 Cal. Assn. of Pinellas
878 (1971); actors &
do md: 40ty of , C 329 So.2d 314gunlders
Broward County, 431 So.2d 606 (Fla. App.
v. u r
P8 E,g„ Hollywood, Inc. a•
Dev. Co. v. South Jordan City, 12L—
1983); Banberry
d of Com'rs. of Palm
v.
and
140 (FIa.Assn App. 1983)ar�. di�md, 105 S. Ct. 376
29. Home Builders
Co tractBeach
Co., 446
(1984).
30. D. Mandelker, Landw, Sec. 9.14 (1982).
at
Li, Urban Land, Sept.,1985
The Office/Housingnkage Issue
31. D. Porter,
17.
e General al oration, et al.,
Sean P. et al v. hAction 76438t(Marchp31 rever
32
No.
Suffolk Superior Court Civilonan
(Mass. 1986)
Boston, 496 N.E,2d 640 (Mass. 19892,
3rd 892,
sed, sub nom, Bonan v. City of
City of San Francisco, 177 Cal. App.
Terming P aza Corp. v.
223 Cal. Rptr. 379 (1986).
41
36
33, Pennsylvania Coal Co.
67 L. Ed. 322 (1922), V. Mahon, 260 U.S. 393, 416
43 S. Ct. 158, 160,
34' Collis V. City of Bloomington, 246 N.W,
35. K. 87e2d 19, 27 (Minn. 1976),
Eminent�Domain Exactions(S W.- etel fln!ds) 3104 Inst' on Planning, Zoning and
9 Found.
36. 261
(1982 Bama, Inc, v. Anne Arundel Count
Hills)' Lake Intervale Names, Inc, y, 53 Md. APP. 14, 451 A.2d
water 28 N,J. 423, 147 A.2d 28 v• Township of Parsi fro
main struck down because it958ecked Q 8aon-site
whether improvements were required (Ordinance rfardsa�jrjn
4 by a particular dev determining
37. Cunningham, su ra development•)
.;I �, note 4, at 422, i
38, E. Landau, Urban Concentration and �
Some Const Urban nal Problems Land Exactions for
Orae ev, 1 in Mandator Dedicatj Recreational Use:
83- 7 1 72 Ordinances in
39• Montgomery v. Crossroads Land Co.,Dev, v. McPherson 355 SO -2d 363
Wayne, 370 Mich. 329,
McPherson,
823 1963 ans 174, 368 P'2d 511a, 1978); Coronado
Ore. 99 359 p,2d 108 ( (1962); Gordon v,
Board of Aldermen (1961)' Cf., Middlesex Haugen Y. Gleason, 226
Associated Home BuildersMaInc .ss.849, 359 N•E•2d 1279°stop Street R
Scarsdale, 18 N, Y. Y• v.
2d 78 Walnut Creek, su ra1977)• But see,
7� Village of 218 N,E.2d 673 2712d—�'2den951 (1966);
ordan v, g Menomonee Falls
dam, 385 U. S, 4 (1966)• '
442, 446-47 (Wis.),
1 40. Iowa Code (1985) Sec, 364.1.
l 41• Iowa Code (1985) Sec. 364.2,(3).
42, Bryan v, City of Des Moines
.,lof College Station V. Turtle ,Ro 6 o W.2d 685 (Iowa 1978); accord, City
Il 9
43• City of College Station v. Turtle Rock Corp.. 680 S,W,2d 802 (Tex. 1984),
quoting Lower Colorado River Auth. v, Ciy ofuSan, 680 S W d at 807
J 641 (Tex. 1975) See Moore v,
253-54, 484 P,2d 134, 136-37 (1971)ity of Boulder, 29 Colo. APP. 248,
44• Iowa Code (1985) Sec. 364.3,(4),
I45, Iowa Code (1985) Sec. 364.3(3),
46, Code (1985) Sec, 364.3(3),
47. Compare Code (1985) sec. 409.14 with City Code secs, 27 -43(c) -(f)
32-54 through 32-58,
48, Code (1985) Sec. 384.84(2). and
! 49, Code (1973) Sec, 393,14.
i
l
;I
37
50.
North Liberty Land Co. v. Inc. City of North Liberty, 311 N.W.2d 101,
103(Iowa 1981). Lloyd E. Clarke, Inc. v. City of Bettendorf, 158
N.W.2d 125 (Iowa 1968) is no longer good law. It involved a pre -home
rule lack of statutory authority to impose hook -on fees. Code Ch. 393
was enacted in response to this case.
51.
Code Sec. 364.3(4).
52.
E.g., Internorth, Inc. V. Iowa State Bd. of Tax Review, 333 N.W.2d 471,
476 (Iowa 1983); Newman v. City of Indianola, 232 N.W.2d 568, 573 (Iowa
1975); In re Trust of Shurtz, 242 Iowa 448, 454, 46 N.W.2d 559, 562
(1951); Bennett v. Greenwalt, 226 Iowa 1113, 1134, 286 N.W. 722, 732
Iowa 712, 715, 161 N.W. 625, 626
(1939); Cornelius v. Krominga, 179
(1917).
53.
Newman Y. City of Indianola, supra, 232 N.W.2d at 573-74.
,,, .
54.
Coach Apts.
a taxwith T wn oof f 662 P.2d
) Longboat
V
888P(Wyo.C1983)r(fee/segrege
no
at d, hence not
Lands End, Ltd., 443 So.2d 574 (Fla. App. 1983) (in -lieu fee
Key v.
invalid tax where not segregated).
55.
Aunt v�IBI,
Conn. Supp. 74, 230gA.2d 45 (1967); CityPofnFayetteville Inc.,
280 Ark. 484, 659 S.W.2d 505 (1983).
56.
D. Hagman and J. Juergensmeyer, Urban Planning and Land Development
Control Law (2nd ed.) (Practitioner's Ed.) 810 .2, p. 296. (Hereinafter
r'
ci a as agman and 'Juergensmeyer.") Cf. Pennsylvania Coal Co. v.
Mahon, supra, note 22.
57,
Id, 810.2, note 4, p. 296. See Stone v. city of Wilton, 331 N.W.2d 398
the Takin E uation and Makin the
(Iowa 1983); R. Freilich, Solving
Its s, e Urban awyer Pring
Whole Equal the Sum of ar
1983).
58.
Inc. Town of Carter Lake v. Anderson E. 6 W. Co., 241 N.W.2d 896, 901
Iowa 1281, 97 N.W.2d
(Iowa 1976); Hermann v. City of Des Moines, 250
893 (1979). Accord A. Vestel, Iowa Land Use and Zoning Law, 82.16, pp.
57-58.
59.
C. Antieau, IA Municipal Corporation Law, 858A.12 -8A.17, pp. 8A -26
-SA -38. (Hereinafter cited as "Antieau.")
60.
Kinzli v. City of Santa Cruz, 620 F. Supp. 609, 616 (N.D. Cal. 1985).
61,
Berg. Bev. Co. v. City of Missouri City, 603 S.W.2d 273 (Tex.Civ.App.
1980).
62.
City of College Station v. Turtle Rock Corp., supra.
63.
J. Mixon, Texas Land Use Cases 1984-1985: Sec. 1983, E ua1 Protection
Subdivision Exac ions an s, ns on anm ng, on ng, an
at ion) Sec. 4-1, p. 4-20•
EminentDomain S. ego oun
G/
I
38
64. 22 I11. 2d 375, 380, 176 N.E.2d 799, 802 (1961).
65.
Krughoff v. Naperville, 41 111. App. 2d 334, 354 N.E.2d 489, aff'd, 68
I11. 2d 352, 369 N.E.2d 892 (1979); Board
of Educ. v. Surety Develop-
ers, Inc., 347 N.E.2d 149 (111. 1975).
66.
Associated Home Builders v. City of Walnut Creek, 4 Cal. 3rd 633, 640
n. 6, 94 Cal. Rptr. 630, 636 n. 6, 484 P.2d 606, 612 n. 6 a dismd,
404 U.S. 878 (1971) Accord, Norsco Enterprises
V. City o remoun ,
54 Cal. App. 3rd 488, 126 Cal. Rptr. 659 (1976); but see, Trent
Meredith Inc. v. City of Oxnard, 170 Cal. Rptr. 685 (Ct. App. 1981) and
Liberty v. California Costal Com'n.,
170 Cal. Rptr. 247 (Cal. App,
1980).
67.
28 Wisc. 2d 608, 137 N.W.2d 442, appeal dismissed, 385 U.S. 4, 87 S.
Ct. 36, 17 L. Ed.
2d 3 (1966).
68.
Ch. 570, Laws of 1955, sec. 236.45(1); 27 W.S.A. 534. Compare Iowa
Code Sec. 409.14.
69.
Jordan vs. Menomonee Falls, supra, 137 N.W.2d at 447.
70.
Id at 448.
71.
Id at 450.
72.
-55 S.W.2d 832, 835 (Mo. 1977).
73.
Bethlehem Evangelical Lutheran Church v. City of Lakewood, 626 P.2d 668
(Colo. 1981); Town
of Longboat Key v. Lands End, Ltd., 433 So.2d 574
(Fla. App. 1983); Lampton v. Pinaire, 610 S.W.2d 915 (Ky. App. 1980);
Collis V. City of Bloomington, 310 Minn. 5, 246 N.W.2d 19 (1976); Bill-
ings Properties, Inc. v. Yellowstone County, 144 Mont.
25, 394 P.2d 182
(1964); Simpson v. City of North Platte, 206 Neb. 240, 292 N.W.2d 297
(1980); Land/Vest
Properties, Inc. v. Town of Plainfield, 379 A.2d 200
(N.H. 1977); Longridge Builders, Inc, Y. Planning Bd., 52 N.J.
348, 245
A.2d 336 (1967); Kamhi v. Planning Board of Yorktown, 59 N.Y. 2d 385,
465 N.Y.S. 2d 865, 452 N.E.2d 1193 (1983); Messer v. Town of Chapel
S.E.2d 632
;(PartCmwlthRealty83)
Twp. Bd.
of Supervisors,C457pp. A.2d982) 240 InCity ofriht
lege Station col-
v. Turtle Rock Corp., 680 S.W.2d 802 (Tex. 1985); Home
Builders Assn. v. Provo City, 28 Utah 2d
402, 503 P.2d 451 (1972);
Coulter v. City of Rawlins, 662 P.2d 888 (Wyo. 1983).
74.
East Neck Estates, Ltd. v. Luchsinger, 61 Misc. 2nd 619, 305 N.Y.S. 2d
922 (Sup. Ct.
1969).
75.
Grupe Y. California Coastal Com'n., 166 Cal. App. 3rd 148 (1985).
Accord Whaler's
Village Club v. California Coastal Com'n., 173 Cal.
App. 3rd 240 (1983). The U.S. Supreme Court has noted probable juris-
diction (107 S. Ct. 312) in Nollan V. California Coastal Can'n., 177
Cal. App. 3rd
719, 223 Cal. Rptr. 28, on the question of whether a
state
can, as a condition of building permit issuance, require an owner
to provide
an easement across his/her land for public access to a
beach.
GI
1
■
39
16. 329 So.2d 314 (Fla.) cert, denied, 444 U.S. 867, 100 S. Ct. 140, 62 L.
Ed. 2d 91 (1979).
77. 312 So.2d 763, 766 (Fla. App,),
78. City of Dunedin v. Contractors and Builders Assn, of Pinellas Co., 358
So.2d 846 (Fla. App, 1978),
79. 431 So.2d 606 (Fla. App. 1983).
80. 446 So.2d 140 (Fla. App.), appeal dismissed, 105 S. Ct. 376 (1984).
81. 631 P.2d 899, 903-04 (Utah 1981).
82. 642 P.2d 376 (Utah 1982).
83. 663 P.2d 95 (Utah 1983),
84. See, F. Bosselman and N. Stroud, Mandator Tithes: The Le alit of
Land Develo ment Linka e, 9 Nova L. er
68-69, cMdas osse man roud"); Schultz &1Ke1 ey,( supra, notes 3, at
85
Georgia-Pacific Corp, V. California Costal Com'n., 132 Cal. App, 3rd
Amato183 Y. RandolphrTwp95Planning Bd.,son 188vN.J.tSuof North per. 439,P452tA.2su ra$
(1982); 181, Inc. Y. Salem County Planning Bd. 133 N.J. Super 350, 366
A.2d 501, modf'd, on other grounds, 140 N.J. Super 247, 356 A.2d 34
(1976) (local government wishing to bank land must pay just compensa-
supor). ButtseeaKrieger, vinPlanningiComn'nht 4,n 24 Md 320, Board 3 3,p 167sA.2d
885, 88b 8% U961) (upholding requirement that developer's plan take
into account the widening of an unlimited access road),
86, Schultz & Kelley, supra, note 3, at 68.
87. Antieau, su ra, note 59, 58A.13, P. 8A-33,
88. Antieau, su ra, sec. 8A.13, citing Howard County v. JJM, Inc., 301 Md,
259, 482 A.2d 908 (1984); see also Ventures in Property I v. City of
Wichita, 225 Kans. 698, 594 P.2d 671 (1979) (reservation "for possible
highway purposes at some indefinite date in the distant future" held to
be inverse condemnation); Brazer v. Borough of Mountainside, 55 N.J.
456, 262 A.2d 857 (1970) (subdivision approval may not be conditioned
upon a reservation of right-of-way through property when not necessary
or rationally related to the subdivision).
89. See, Land/Vest Properties, Inc. V. Town of Plainfield, supra; Home
Builders and Contractors Assn. Y. Board of County Com'rs. o m Beach
Co., supra,
90. 42 Cal. App, 3rd 247, 170 Cal, Rptr 247 (1980).
G/
-I
40
91.
Cupp Y. Bd. of Supervisors of Fairfax County,
318 S.E.2d
407, 414-15
(Va. 1984). See Howard County v. JJM, Inc., 482 A.2d 908,
1984).
920-21 (Md.
92.
City of Fayetteville v. IBI, Inc., 280 Ark.
(1983).
484, 659
S.W.2d 505
93.
716 F.2d 646 (9th Cir. 1983). See also Shelton
Station, 780 F.2d 475 (5th Cir. 1986).
v. City
of College
94.
42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983.
95.
Bosselman & Stroud, supra, note 84, at 393-94.
96.
105 S. Ct. 3249, 3254 (1985).
97.
Id at 3254.
y�u
98.
Id at 3255.
''--
99.
Id at 3255.
100.
487 P.2d 866 (Utah 1971).
101.
38 Ohio Misc. 37, 311 N.E.2d 876 (1973).
'i
102.
604 P.2d 886 (Or. Ct. App. 1979).
:a
103.
Currier, supra, note 21, at 277.
z=
104.
But Cal. App. see J.WJones 3rd Co
84)f San Diego, 203
Cal. Rptr.
581, 588,
156 (19v.
a _1
;a
105.
New Orleans v. Dukes, 427 U.S. 297, 303-04, 96 S.
Ed. 2d 511 (1976).
Ct. 2513, 2517, 49 L.
106.
See e.g. Snyder and Stegman, supra, note 20, at
Development Fees for Infrastructure, Urban
185-190; M.
Stegman,
,(
Land 3
alloy, supra, [JuLe J, at 12, n. 31.
(May 1986);
Schultz &
X,
107.
Stegman, Development Fees for Infrastructure, at 3.
4l
108.
Id, at 6.
zl
a!i
MARIAN K. KAKK
..CITY.CLERK, (1) .
CITY OF IOWACHIC CENTER 410 E. W I CITY
WASHINGTON ST. IOWA CITY, IOWA 52240 (319) 356-50M
City Council
City of Iowa City
Iowa City, Iowa 52240
Mayor and Councilmembers:
As expected, we have experienced a great deal of difficulty in balancing the FY88
budget. The City's program of services, that which the community now enjoys, will
continue to experience financial difficulties if it is to continue to be financed by
our current program of revenue. With Federal and State resources disappearing, the
revenues which once supplemented our program of services are now no longer available
and we are seeing serious competition among service providers for limited City re-
sources. This competition, in most circumstances a healthy situation, is now causing
consternation and frustration among all of those affected. There appears to be little
hope for any fiscal policy change on the part of the state and federal government that
would cause any turnaround in these circumstances, and therefore it will be particu-
larly critical'in your evaluation of the FY88 budget to determine the breadth and scope
of the package of services that we are to provide with our limited resources.
Most often the budget is perceived to be an annual agony that we must endure. It is
not likely that we will see change in statutory requirements or the community pressures
brought to bear upon the City government from interest groups. Therefore it seems
inevitable that this struggle for resources will continue well into our future.
The laws that govern the budget preparation process, as well as the State imposed re-
strictions on revenues, will often cause us to look at our budget in the short term
(annual agony), when in fact we should view any program of expenditures and revenues
over the long run. As community interest groups debate the merits of a particular
program and the City Council is challenged to seek long-term solutions to these issues,
our fiscal policy proposals (many times imposed upon us) are mere stopgap short-term
solutions. It is my judgment that our program of City services cannot continue at its
current level with the resources that are available and a critical goal for the near
term will be to stabilize the program of services at an affordable level and educate
the community as to limits that are placed upon their city government,
Wide swings in fiscal and program policies appear to be inevitable consequences of the
Federal and State political process. As a local government, we must guard ourselves
against those congressional/legislative whims that affect our ability to provide a
program of municipal service as well as the requirements that we have to fulfill state
moi'
and federal mandates. Our program of aiding social service agencies is a example of
our response to federal fiscal policy. We accept the funds in the short run and then
as our community becomes accustomed to receiving the services that are financed di-
rectly by the federal government, we are faced with the long-term consequences of
service reduction decisions. Aid to various social support programs is important to the
quality of life and character of our community, but is measured in the short run
against continued receipt of federal aid. Our Community Development Block Grant Pro-
gram, which is an integral part of the City's ability to pursue a program of safe and
sanitary housing throughout our community, could at some time in the future, as is
currently being discussed by the federal government, be subjected to congressional
changes and thereby this program could experience a similar fiscal distress that is now
being imposed upon area social service agencies.
No better example of the critical impact of Federal and State fiscal policies is that
on our transit system. It is difficult to determine at this time the full impact of
transit service reductions; however, it is clear that we have traditionally utilized
Federal and State resources to underwrite both the operating and capital cost of our
transit system. We have, over the years, created a transit dependent component of our
citizenry within our local economy and yet we have seen a dramatic fall-off in our
ridership. Our traditional response is similar to that of many other communities
facing similar transportation crises, that is, if there is a decline in participation
in a service by our citizens, it is an indication of a lack of community support and
thereby we should move to reduce that service accordingly. Conventional
economic/fiscal policy would lead to such a decision but simultaneously we must con-
sider as with all of our other City services, it is an integral part of the quality and
character of our community. If we were to experience a lull in the number of fire calls
or other emergency requests, I suspect that we would not reduce our program of fire
suppression capabilities and similar analogies can be made to our police services and
other programs within what is thought of as our traditional package of municipal serv-
ice. This is the dilemma that we face. We have a broad program of public service that
has been accepted and expected by our community, and recently expanded, through the
addition of capital and operating costs for new swimming pools, and yet the City does
not have the resources to assure the long-term financing capacity for such programs.
i
Unless we can provide for an expanded revenue base, serious expenditure reductions in
all of our services are likely to continue well into our future and the annual agony
will reoccur time and time again. The continuing erosion of such services would also
have a dramatic effect upon the community as we now know it. With the growing citizen
complaints associated with property taxation, it does not appear that it could be ex-
panded to meet the service requests/revenue reductions imposed by the state and federal
y policies and state tax limitations. Permanent, growth oriented revenues that would be
subject to economic fluctuations, both positive and negative, are necessary to assure
that we can eliminate our overdependence upon one primary source of revenue (property
tax) and avoid the above scenario being imposed upon the community.
The City also needs to build stronger financial reserves so that we are able to "ride
out" economic/legislative fluctuations that often occur and cause the resultant dra-
matic shifts in our ability to provide service. Transit is again a clear example of a
service that is experiencing declines, but due to the fact that there are no reasonable
reserves available to finance gradual changes in service, we are faced with a yearly
crisis and the likelihood of severe reductions given other service demands, is our only
option. Support groups will point to the fact that the City does have the authority
under the State law to provide for additional property tax support for the transit
system, however, utilizing maximum tax support for any program should be the last
resort, for it simply continues the fiscal brinkmanship that is being imposed upon us
at this time. If we were to choose maximum taxation, it is suggested that it only be
i done so with the understanding that we are attempting to build a healthy financial
future and not use the tax support for a year -by -year stopgap solution. In the case of
transit, with the state property tax limitations, and in conjunction with ridership and
revenue declines, it is unlikely that even maximum tax support can provide short-term,
let alone long-term, financial solutions.
The budget needs to be a long-term plan for a program of services that can be reasona-
bly financed in the future and thereby our service package needs to have an element of
stability as well as the capability to provide for moderate growth that we will con-
tinue to experience. It would also allow us to adapt to the changing economic, politi-
cal, social and environmental issues within our community.
In the public debates associated with local government budgets, we find ourselves
preoccupied by a limited number of constituent groups. These groups are making their
case with respect to their service requests and are afforded, as they should be, an
opportunity to compete for limited resources. We must, however, keep in mind that our
basic service program should not be significantly sacrificed. For example, in this
budget, it was determined after extensive review that our fire equipment is reaching a
precarious position with respect to the safety of the personnel that utilize the equip-
ment as well as our ability to respond in a quality manner to citizen requests or fire
and rescue service. The budget recommends over $450,000 in spending to provide for
replacement fire equipment. Our police facility and its obvious deficiencies as well
as the general program of services that was proposed by department directors also were
reviewed and it was determined that given our fiscal limitations, no significant expan-
sion could be provided. This was a particularly critical decision in that we must
monitor the traditional services as well as those that are often associated with fed-
eral and state support, for these traditional services have even a greater influence on
the character and quality of our community.
The City government is called upon to be an active participant in economic development
and play an integral part in the local economy. We are often criticized for insuffi-
cient economic development efforts, and I would like to point out that the City has
undertaken significant steps with respect to economic development, such as the issuance
of industrial development revenue bonds (over $10D million in the last 6 years), eco -
economic development agencies, as well as providing a traditional
nomic development financial incentives, participation in and the funding of regional
services, critical to the continued success of our business community, package of municipal
As any large employer, the City employees and the payroll generated has an effect on
our local economy. I would like to believe that the City budget is far more than a
program of services and a reason to have local tax dollars spent, for the City budget
also contributes significantly to the local economy. We currently have an employee
payroll of over $11.3 million and $500,000 was paid by our employees to the State of
Iowa in income tax withholding, $1.6 million in federal income tax withholding, and
$600,000 as the employees' share of social security. Adjustments certainly can be made
to our overall program of services, but we must keep in mind that the removal of any
significant funding, whether it be tax supported or not, can have a long lasting effect
on our local economy. It is estimated that the City government purchases over $7
million annually in goods and services in the area economy. We also need to be con-
cerned about the fact that student enrollment in the 90's is projected to be signifi-
cantly lower than the current enrollment at the University and therefore could have a
particularly significant effect on the commercial/retail component in the economy. We
must prepare and anticipate economic changes and thereby the City's efforts in economic
development and growth must be sustained as well as, a program of revenue, more eco-
nomically sensitive, can be pursued.
The average residential property tax payer who owns a home valued at $68,450, currently
pays $1,416 annually in property tax support to the City, County, Schools and State
governments. Of that taxation, City services require 39% or $549. The proposed FY88
budbasis, propertywould crease taxesthe wouldn increasefromrfromtax
thefor
current services
oft$45.78 to612. nE50 96,han
increase of 11.3%.
We have now reached a point in our overall long-term financial planning that short-term
solutions are no longer practical, let alone available. I believe we cannot continue to
patch together a program of municipal service and we must chart a course over the next
decade to prepare for eventual changes in the character and quality of our community
with respect to reduction in City services. As a goal of the City Council, I have been
i directed to prepare options, choices, etc. with respect to conceptualizing an "image
2000" of the City. The image and the proposals that are prepared will be significantly
affected by the quality of City services. Assuming a well -funded program of City serv-
ices, a projection indicating an image of health and growth can be identified. Con-
tinuing dilution of City services as well as the economic changes anticipated by
declines in student enrolment could project an entirely different image.
In an effort to pursue a program as well as attend to our financial concerns, I would
suggest the City Council create a citizens ad hoc committee to determine the desirabil-
ity of pursuing local tax options in light of the City's financial position and the
Potential for dramatic changes in our program of services over the next decade. It
would be my recommendation that the Committee be made up of a broad spectrum of citizen
interests and they convene and discuss the City's present revenue projections, program
of services, and other expenditure considerations so that the Committee may advise the
Council as to the desirability of pursuing local tax options.
Sincerely yours,
January, 1987
Steph . At i s
City n er
CITY OF IOWA CITY
FY88 OPERATING BUDGET
PROPERTY TAX
The City's property tax request of $12,336,371 for FY88 will be levied as follows:
FY87
FY86
Dollars
Per $1000
ssessment
Dollars Per
$1000
General
1,247,084*
7.510
Trust & Agency
664 657
693
Subtotal
Tort Liability
7,911,741
355,300
FM
.370
Debt Service
1,872,145
1.952
Transit
345,354
.360
Subtotal
10,484,540
10 885
Ag. Bldgs. & Land
9,508
3.004
Total
10,494,048
FY87
9,702 3.004
11,269192
*Includes monies and credits of $28,816 and military credit of $13,800.
**Includes monies and credits of $28,416 and military credit of $13,800
FY88
Assessment
Dollars
Per $1000
Per $1000
7,555,463*
7.107
7.111
.415
T�54'd'I
7.Eff
',437
882,438
.835
2,003,195
1.892
380,077
.360
11,260,090
10.609
9,702 3.004
11,269192
*Includes monies and credits of $28,816 and military credit of $13,800.
**Includes monies and credits of $28,416 and military credit of $13,800
FY88
ssessmen
Dollars
Per $1000
7,603,433**
7.111
717:62048
.709
'366 1
753,438
TM
.712
2,700,618
2.536
511,793
,481
12,326,490
11.5549
9.881 3.004
12,336,371
Total assessed valuation in Iowa City increased from $1,217,907,203 for FY87 to $1,239,781,694 for FY88, or an
increase of 1.8%. The majority of the increase, 1.5%, resulted from growth in real property (new construc-
tion). This is a diminishing increase as real property growth has ranged from 4.3% to 1.7% in the past five
years with the average annual growth rate being 2.6%.
The taxable valuation is computed by applying the State's rollback factor to the total assessed valuation. The
rollback factor is designed to limit taxable valuation for the State, as a whole, to a 4% annual increase.
The County Auditor makes adjustments to property valuations and applies the rollback factors, and property
credits to arrive at the taxable valuations. For the debt service levy, the property credits for tax
increment financing (TIF) districts are added back to the valuations. For FY87, Iowa City's taxable valuation
for the debt service levy was $1,027,586,304 and was $1,025,936,855 for all other levies. The net taxable
valuation for FY88 is estimated to be $1,064,978,688 for the debt service levy and $1,063,312,745 for all
other levies.
s
I
M
This proposed budget will result in an 11.3% increase in City property taxes for the average residential
property owner. General City services were allowed a 6% increase in property taxes while the debt service
costs on the swimming pool bond issue, approved by voters in June 1986, require a 5.3% increase in property
taxes. The following chart shows how property taxes for the average residential property will be affected by
the property tax levy recommended in the proposed budget. The average residential assessed valuation used in
this chart is based on information obtained from the City Assessor.
I
CITY PROPERTY TAXES FOR AVERAGE RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY
FY86 FY87 FY88 FY88 INCREASE
OVER FY87
AVERAGE RESIDENTIAL
ASSESSED VALUATION
I-1-84 $65,754
1-1-85 $68,450 0%
1-1-86 $68,450
ROLLBACK FACTOR .724832 .756481 .773604 2.3%
TAXABLE VALUATION $47,661 $51,781 $52,953 2.3%
ri
LEVY - ACTUAL/PROJECTED 10.885 10.609 11.549 8,9%
PROPERTY TAXES $518_79 $549_34 $611_55 11.3%
Property taxes which fund General Fund operations will increase 2.7% in FY88 and include the following levies:
FY86
FY87
FY88
General
$7,247,084
$7,555,463
$7,603,433
Tort Liability
355,300
882,438
753,438
Trust & Agency
Ag, Bldgs & Land
664,657
438,917
757,208
9.508
8--�----___
9 702
0
=='8=
=_'-_NNIH
9ID1RAL FOND
OW BERVICR
PAFJCM OPERATION&
PARKING, RESERVES
POLUMON CONTROL OPERATIONS
POLL CORTROL, EYmma
MATER OPERATIONS
IATL4,WRRVIN
RARE COLLZCMON OPERATIONS
LANDFILL OPERATIONS
LANDFILL RNNNAVES
AIRPORT OPERATIONS
AIRPORT R9SnVE8
TRANSIT OPERATIONS
TRANSIT nsnvzs
TRUST A AGENCY, PENS A RETIRE
JOCOG
ROAD USE TAY
nDR7AL RRVONOE SNARING
CDBG, MMM ENTITLDmRT
CITY OF IOWA CITY
PYBB OPERATING BUDGET
FINANCIAL SUMMARY - PY88
______________ --------
BALANCE PROPERTY OTHER TRANSFERS TOTAL DISBURSE- TRANSFERS TOTAL DIS- BALANCE
6-30-87 TAX RECEIPTS IN RECEIPTS Ems OUT BURSENENTS 6-30-88
1,701,568 9,038,365 3,522,034 3,507,298 16,067,697 15,122,379 1,181,646 16,303,625 1,465,440
57,643
2,700,618
11,928
825,211
3,537,757
3,595,400
0
3,595,400
0
13,049
0
1,906,825
6,000
1,912,825
1,029,074
896,600
1,925,874
0
1,159,812
0
0
684,800
684,800
625,838
0
625,838
1,218,774
308,200
0
4,822,063
0
4,822,083
1,114,514
3,264,050
4,378,564
751,719
9,470,130
0
152,694
3,363,160
3,515,654
3,123,160
481,510
3,604,690
9,3B1,294
75,098
0
2,265,708
0
2,265,706
1,910,075
210,035
2,120,110
220,696
648,666
0
48,068
234,580
282,648
198,580
198,580
397,160
534,354
57,704
0
614,240
0
614,240
620,347
0
620,347
51,597
476,713
0
702,972
0
702,972
480,661
25,000
505,661
674,024
282,919
0
13,092
25,000
38,092
0
0
0
321,011
3,650
0
95,423
103,113
198,536
169,186
33,000
202,186
0
106,149
0
7,264
0
7,264
0
0
0
113,413
4,037
0
1,019,178
831,793
1,850,971
1,853,421
0
1,853,421
1,587
95 041
0
6,900
0
6,900
0
0
0
101,941
-57,060
757,208
102,765
0
859,973
97,500
696,690
796,190
8,723
06,156
0
69,710
86,166
155,876
156,723
0
156,723
85,709
245,683
0
1,790,407
0
1,790,407
0
2,036,090
2,036,090
0
451,517
0
0
0
0
0
451,517
451,517
0
0
0
733,000
0
733,000
717,898
15,102
733,000
0
--- ------- ------------ ----8840 40, 1__882
I
GRAND TOTAL 15,186,875 12,196,391 17,881,291 9,667,121 40,047,603 10 B14r756 9,189,810 10,]01,596 11,979,882
-I
CITY COUNCIL
CITY CLERK
CITY ATTORNEY
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
CITY MANAGER
HUMAN RELATIONS
BROADBAND TELECOMMUNICATIONS
FINANCE
RISK MANAGEMENT
GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS
CIVIL RIGHTS
NON -OPERATIONAL ADMINISTRATIO
PLANNING & PROGRAM DEVELOPMEN
ENGINEERING
PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION
C.H.D. MAINTENANCE
ENERGY CONSERVATION
POLICE
FIRE DEPARTMENT
ANIMAL CONTROL
HOUSING & INSPECTION SERVICES
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
STREET SYSTEM MAINTENANCE
FORESTRY/HORTICULTURE
FYBBTOPERATING BUDGET
AUTHORIZED PERSONNEL LISTING
FULL-TIME EQUIVALENTS
FULL
PART -------
FULL __ FY88-------
TIME
TIME TOTAL TIME
PARTT
TOTAL
7.00
.00
7.00
7.00
.00
7.00
3.00
.25
3.25
3.00
.25
3.25
4.00
.00
4.00
4.00
.00
4.00
1.00
.00
1.00
1.00
.00
1.00
3.00
.00
3.00
3.00
.00
3.00
3.00
.00
3.00
3.00
.00
3.00
1.00
.75
1.75
1.00
.75
1.75
31.10
1.62
32.72
31.10
1.62
32.72
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
2.00
.00
2.00
2.00
.00
2.00
1.00
.00
1.00
1.00
.00
1.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
6.25
.00
6.25
6.25
.00
6.25
10.00
.00
10.00
10.00
00
10.00
2.00
.00
2.00
2.00
.00
2.00
1.00
.00
1.00
1.00
.00
1.00
.00
.50
.50
.00
.50
.50
63.00
.50
63.50
63.00
,50
63.50
51.00
.00
51.00
51.00
.00
51.00
4.00
.00
4.00
4.00
.00
4.00
11.00
.00
11.00
11.00
.00
11.00
8.00
.00
8.00
8.00
.00
8.00
18.50
.00
18.50
18.50
.00
18.50
2.00
.00
2.00
2.00
.00
2.00
T
i
CEMETERY
PARES & RECREATION
LIBRARY
SENIOR CENTER
** TOTAL GENERAL FUND
PARKING OPERATIONS
POLLUTION CONTROL OPERATIONS
WATER OPERATIONS
REFUSE COLLECTION OPERATIONS
LANDFILL OPERATIONS
AIRPORT OPERATIONS
TRANSIT OPERATIONS
** TOTAL ENTERPRISE FUNDS
JCCOG
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
CENTRAL SUPPLY & PRINT
ASSISTED HOUSING
CDBG, RENTAL REHAB.
CDBG, METRO ENTITLEMENT
** TOTAL OTHER FUNDS
**** GRAND TOTAL
CITY OF IOWA CITY
FY88 OPERATING BUDGET
AUTHORIZED PERSONNEL LISTING
FULL -TINE EQUIVALENTS
-------
FY87
-------
-------
FY88
-------
TIME
.00
22.00
10.75
.00
10.75
----
TIMET
----
TOTAL
-----
TIME
----
TIME
----
TOTAL
-----
3.00
.00
3.00
3.00
.00
3.00
22.00
.00
22.00
22.00
.00
22.00
21.00
5.75
26.75
21.00
5.75
26.75
4.00
.50
4.50
4.00
.50
4.50
282.85 9.87 292.72
17.00
8.50
25.50
17.00
.00
17.00
22.00
.00
22.00
10.75
.00
10.75
6.75
.00
6.75
1.00
.00
1.00
29.00
20.50
49.50
103.50
29.00
132.50
3.80
.00•
3.80
18.00
.00
18.00
.90
.00
.90
7.00
.00
7.00
.00
.00
.00
3.95
.00
3.95
33.65
.00
33.65
420.00
38.87
458.87
282.85
9.87
292.72
17.00
8.50
25.50
17.00
.00
17.00
22.00
.00
22.00
10.75
.00
10.75
6.75
.00
6.75
1.00
.00
1.00
20.00
20.50
'40.50
94.50
29.00.123.50
3.80
.00
3.80
18.00
.00
18.00
.90
.00
.90
7.00
.00
7.00
.00
.00
.00
3.95
.00
3.95
33.65
.00
33.65
411.00
38.87
449.87
CITY OF IOWA CITY
FY88 OPERATING BUDGET
SUMMARY OF RECEIPTS a EXPENDITURES
GENERAL FUND
WHERE THE MONEY CONES FROM
WHERE THE MONEY GOES
6H
-- n
..
-
ADMINISTRATION
'1
I
10.91
r
PARKS 1 RECREATION
17.11
P
FR
IIMtt • it[[
- I
191
LIBRARY
j
8.61
eaLlce
19.91
IROetATY LK
ID
.. ro^'
Ir%rt
ui[[t[i IIICDWt
PUBLIC WORKS
3 G
IW
16.71
rs
r
-
FIRE
+20
17.01
V
2�
Bye
I
a0 ti
r
II
Y'
G:f
1987 — 88 EXPENDITURE HIGHLIGHTS
FY86 FY87
ActualFY88
Estimate
Pro—ed
CITY COUNCIL $286,173
$304,129 $115,061
- The FY88 was reduced by the expenditure for Aid to
Agencies, which has now been reassigned to another
account.
at* ak �k'k>k A>k Aok A ye ak ok ak* ak.*>k*
CITY CLERK 139,934
112,808
132,416
- There are no significant changes in the City Clerk
budget for FY88. A new recording/audio system was
requested in the amount of $7,500 for the Council
Chambers. While the current system is showing its
age, the significance of the request lead to the
recommendation that it not be included in the budget
at this time. If at some time in the future the
Civic Center is expanded/remodeled, built-in systems,
such as a new audio/recording device, should be
considered. An expanded computer-aided retrieval
system in the amount of $2,000 was also requested,
but not included. This can be considered at the
time we review all data processing modernization
proposals submitted by all departments.
yk ak ak>k W ak ak ar ok �k Yk ak ak -Ar >k nk W 1k 7k ak
CITY ATTORNEY 195,059
200,437
214,237
- There are no significant changes other than the
addition of $950 for the expansion of the law
library collection.
W ak Wok Wk k sk W ak ak W ok W yV ak W W W W W rok
ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT 40,033 40,000
71,590
- This budget represents the cost for the City's parti-
cipation in the Iowa City Area Development Group,
formerly First Capital, in the amount of $40,000.
Added to this budget for the first year is the cost
of the Economic Development Coordinator, who is now
assigned to the City Manager's office and reflected
in this budget proposal. A commensurate reduction
in cost will be noted in the Urban Planning budget
for the Department of Planning and Program Development.
The City recently received $150,000 as a payment from
the Holiday Inn management for a bond refinancing.
This amount has been pledged to the economic develop-
ment pool and some $6,000 of interest income is
64:1-
-1
FY86 FY87 FY88
Actual Estimate Proposed
Economic Development
(continued) anticipated to help offset the $40,000 payment to the
Iowa City Area Development Group. The use of the loan
pool interest income in this manner is in keeping with
the policy proposals identified in the draft of the
economic development loan pool agreement.
yk ak* ak W W* W ak air afr at ak ak* ak ak W.Ar
CITY MANAGER 193,381
HUMAN
RELATIONS
BROADBAND
TELECOMMUNI—
CATIONS
220,082
190,463
- The cost of labor negotiations (that is, private legal
counsel) is projected to decline in FY88 from $27,000
to $15,000. This is due to the fact that the City
staff, through the Assistant City Manager and Personnel
Administrator, will assume greater responsibility for
the negotiation process. The appropriation for data
processing improvements has now been assigned to the
data processing budget. The review of any new initia-
tives with respect to data processing will continue
to require City Manager approval before implementation.
akak yk ak ak ak air yr air � ak at at ak aY ak ak ak ak
133,909 139,623 150,829
- There are no significant changes in the FY88 budget
for Human Relations. However, it does represent the
first full year of the reorganized Human Relations/
Personnel activities which are now under the super-
vision of the City Manager's office through the
Assistant City Manager.
ak aY at aY ak ylr at apt >k ak aF aF ak ak aY ak aF ak ak
112,780
102,428
88,821
The operating policy for this budget has been that
the cable franchise fees will serve as the source
of revenue. .If the revenues are not received as
Planned, this program will be reduced and/or property
tax subsidy will be needed. This $5,400 payment to
the General Fund has not been included in FY88 and
will be deferred until FY89.
arr*akak atWakatairakat yt ak air akW akakair
M
LCI
CENTRAL PRO—
CUREMENT &
SERVICES
TREASURY
vF.
:YO
WORD
PROCESSING
s+
• -d
1
;t DATA
PROCESSING
200,801 203,353
- There are no changes in this budget.
yr�ryr�+c��yr�c��llcyrst���r���+r
276,419 297,951
- There are no changes in this budget.
ak* air nk* ok ak ak* tk sk acv Yk* W W W ak
127,950 126,733
- There are no changes in this budget.
yr,k akW *Ik ekW *-k ak ak -A 2k ak WWW
194,946
308,658
131,646
226,831 148,951 120,198
- The noticeable decline in expenditures is due to
the fact that FY86 was the year in which a signifi-
cant upgrade of our systems occurred.
ak ylr ak ak ak ak ak �k ak ak ak ak ak tk ak yk yr ak
FY86
FY87
FY88
Actual
Estimate
Proposed
FINANCE
166,979
168,049
179,014
ADM I N I S —
- There are
no significant changes in
this budget.
TRATION
at ,k alt �r �k ak �r yr ak � � ak yt � yrr yrr ylc ak
ACCOUNTING
& 252,269
260,716
271,766
REPORTING
- There are
no significant changes in
this budget.
?��7
air ak yr ak ak ye yfr ak ak ylr yr kyr ak ak yr ak ak
CENTRAL PRO—
CUREMENT &
SERVICES
TREASURY
vF.
:YO
WORD
PROCESSING
s+
• -d
1
;t DATA
PROCESSING
200,801 203,353
- There are no changes in this budget.
yr�ryr�+c��yr�c��llcyrst���r���+r
276,419 297,951
- There are no changes in this budget.
ak* air nk* ok ak ak* tk sk acv Yk* W W W ak
127,950 126,733
- There are no changes in this budget.
yr,k akW *Ik ekW *-k ak ak -A 2k ak WWW
194,946
308,658
131,646
226,831 148,951 120,198
- The noticeable decline in expenditures is due to
the fact that FY86 was the year in which a signifi-
cant upgrade of our systems occurred.
ak ylr ak ak ak ak ak �k ak ak ak ak ak tk ak yk yr ak
a]
GOVERNMENT 152,748
BUILDINGS
CIVIL RIGHTS
177,883
- There are no changes in this budget.
>kwokak'k ak A W>k ak>k
172,685
31,990 35,679 36,663
- There is an indication that -the complexity of the
investigative process continues to grow as it relates
to the work responsibilities of the Civil Rights
Specialist. A proposed Civil Rights Assistant
($10,810) was proposed for expanded service, and
given the complexity of the investigative process as
well as changes in state and federal laws, there
appears to be merit in this proposal. However, the
City is not in a financial position to consider this
recommendation and therefore it has not been included
in the FY88 budget.
akak W1*WWk kakok WWr kaVWWakakak
—1
FY86 FY87 FY88
Actual Estimate Proposed
RISK
MANAGEMENT
709,491 661,424 573,300
- There have been staff discussions concerning the
assignment of work responsibilities with respect to
risk management. While it is our intention to con-
tinue these discussions as well as emphasize the
operational importance of reducing our exposure, no
substantive operational changes are planned at this
time. In FY87, umbrella insurance coverage was
budgeted, but not purchased due to the fact that
the limits of protection decreased substantially
f,
while premium costs skyrocketed. The unexpected
risk management fund balance ($400,000) will be
reserved for any claims or lawsuits that insurance
does not cover. The City currently has $1 million
in insurance coverage compared to $11 million in
previous years. It is also intended that our build-
ings will be appriased in 1987-88 to arrive at
accurage insurable values. The last appraisal was
1972.
..
ak yc yr,r yfr ak ak ak ye ak Nr yt yr �k �+c yc air
GOVERNMENT 152,748
BUILDINGS
CIVIL RIGHTS
177,883
- There are no changes in this budget.
>kwokak'k ak A W>k ak>k
172,685
31,990 35,679 36,663
- There is an indication that -the complexity of the
investigative process continues to grow as it relates
to the work responsibilities of the Civil Rights
Specialist. A proposed Civil Rights Assistant
($10,810) was proposed for expanded service, and
given the complexity of the investigative process as
well as changes in state and federal laws, there
appears to be merit in this proposal. However, the
City is not in a financial position to consider this
recommendation and therefore it has not been included
in the FY88 budget.
akak W1*WWk kakok WWr kaVWWakakak
—1
FY86
Acral
URBgN pLgNNING
& DEVELOPMENT 175,389
PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT
ADMINISTRATION
P
FY87
Esl--Jmate
167,591
FY88
Prod
145,537
_ There
expendituresgfor�FY88 duentosthe�transfereOfcthen
in
Economic Development Coordinator position to the
Economic Development budget.
at at at air ak ak ak at at ak at atr ak at at at ak ak
88,516
103,610
107 Ago
- There is no significant change in this budget.
Yk ak ak aF ak ak at ak ak afr ak ak t4r aF ak afc ak at
ENGINEERING
232,932 368,998
387,496
- There are no significant changes in the engineering
budget. A request for a microfilm reader/printer for
$5,500 was proposed, due to the fact that they no
longer are able to utilize the equipment on a shared
basis with the Department of Housi
Services. Upon reving & Inspection
ew of the use of this equipment,
it was determined that the current microfilm reader/
Printer within Housing and Inspection Services could
$5 transferred to Public Works. An appropriation of
$5,500 has been provided within the Department of
Housing and Inspection Services' budget to provide a
new reader/printer based upon the fact that they
appear to need greater access and have more actual
use of the equipment.
at at air ye at air ak atr a4 ak air at ak y� at y� yr yr
PUBLIC WORKS
ADMINISTRATION 80,807 84,106
89,021
- There is no significant change in this budget.
ak ak>t Nr ak at at at aF at ak at ek at ak*at Wat
CBD
MAINTENANCE 57'260 62,350
81,813
- The major increase in FY88 is due to the addition of
($2e300), treeuum and(shruub0replacemhih e0over FY87
pressure sprayer
budget) and Plaza surface repairs ($5,000).
a4 a4 air at � at at at air >t air at aY ak ar at yfr>k aY
6
FY86 FY87
ActualEstimate FY88
Proposed
Energy
Conservation 16,084 16,593
17,754
- This program remains substantially unchanged. The
Resources Conservation. Commission had requested
office space at the Civic Center. However, this can-
not be accommodated without displacing other City
staff and therefore has not been included in the pro-
posed budget. The Resources Conservation Commission
also requested $4,000 for an expanded service level
=` to reinstitute a program of infrared scanning of
homes owned and/or rented by Iowa City residents.
While this may be a worthwhile service, it has not
been incorporated in the proposed budget. However,
if the Council should consider pursuit of this program,
we may wish to consider some type of chargeback where-
by the service can be made available to property owners
who are willing to pay a fee for the service.
TRAFFIC
ENGINEERING 619,078 644,715 627,094
The program of service for traffic engineering anti-
cipates some minor changes for FY88. The gas and
electric budget for the Division does not provide for
any substantial ability to provide any major addition
to our street light and our street signal systems. If
at any time during the course -of the year the Council
should choose to add any equipment, other than that
already approved, an appropriation for energy conser-
vation/consumption would also need to be considered
for this account. The Division also recommended an
$8,000 appropriation for additional paint to provide
for street striping (that is, painting our street
traffic systems twice per year rather than once which
has been our past practice). The City is not in a
financial position to consider this recommendation
and it therefore is not included in the FY88 budget.
,4 air Nr or yt aSr atrir arr lk ah yc yc yr �r Ne rc a4 ar
STREET SYSTEMS
MAINTENANCE 1,275,812 1,314,299 1,398,241
- This budget provides $250,000 for contracted street
overlay. An appropriation of $20,000 has also been
included for a curb replacement program. Also included
is the funding for the replacement of two wooden leaf
box compartments that are used in our leaf pickup
rh
eplacementwah
snecessary ave �and tad$10,000to a oappropriation
has been provided to have metal compartments fabricated
and installed.
ar air rr a�r�rr air ak trot �k rrak at vc it �r air yr a�
FORESTRY
CEMETERY
j POLIcE
I ADMINISTRATION
7
FrY86
Ac—� F%e87
Est irnate
119,918
132 538
FY88
Pro oaeci
The
budget for this operation124 466
unchanged. It is recommended that�as substantially
eloped whereby the property owner
basis, for tree Policy be dev-
replacement/additions. a, on a 50/50
���
119,798
The FY88 bud 128,998
Perpetual get proposes to utilize 141,722
equipmentPerpetual Care Fund (PCF) for the $19,640 of the
and constructionto ist -of In the maintenancehofe of
departure a stor capital
from currentage b°ilding. This cemetery
To assure that the finaPolicy as theis PCF
maintained, a re Position a with
initiated {n thePFY89 b' °ver five the fund is
bud years, will
*'k ���� 4d thereafter, be
159,263
155,625
There is no change in this 168,000
T
scat �Nc� budget.
PAROL at'k alr �t Nrft ak '4'k.'kaF
1,524,882
1,757,240
There are no significant
1,939,082
Purchase of replacement changes, other than the
storage capacity, The equipment
increased cost and additional
be noted that the
to$50,000°f overtime was also
include F'0 to ' It should also
Pension contributions fobudgeted expenditures
INVESTI'� """'°,�,t,4 the first time.
GATION 176,792
250,339
There Is no change249,521
in this budget.
* st ric N, 'yC� VC ye alr aM,t,k Nr
44,
1
I
0
FY86 FY87
Actual Estimate FY88
�—
POLICE PrrOP
RECORDS 241,968 271,224
292,150
- There is no significant change, other than additional
storage equipment.
at ak �1r a4 a1r at at at at at at at a4 at �r at at ak
SCHOOL
SAFETY 29,924 29,575
32, 764
- There is no change in this budget.
at �t of W VC VC aF at Nr at -1k W at-*ak akat
FIRE 1,552,747
1,974,097 2,539,457
- As indicated in the budget message, following an
extensive analysis, a great deal of our fire fighting
ofuipment is in replacement. e0frparticular concern oor oisand ouriladder
truck, a 1971 model, which is our front line fire
response equipment. It will shortly require extensive
repairs and downtime. Our backup unit is a 1948 model,
which is not certified as safe. This major purchase
($450,000) and numerous other items account for the
significant increase. No funds were historically
appropriated to replace fire equipment. However,
assuming it is affordable, our fire equipment should
be depreciated similar to our other vehicles in the
future budget years. It is estimated the annual
depreciation schedule would be #75,000 per year. it
should also be noted that FY87 and FY88 budgeted
expenditures include pension contribution costs.
aF aF]ky{,lk yk yc yt a1C 11f'sk y��y���yf yt NC
ANIMAL CONTROL 119,283
130,333 144,384
- This budget reflects no capital expansion of the
current facilities. The increase in FY88 is due to
truck replacement.
at scat at a4 ak ak ak ak ar at Nr at �r ak at air at air
4A
X,
-I
BUILDING
INSPECTION 163,061 174,237 183,755
- There are no significant changes in this budget.
r
at ar ak ar ak w ar w W ar ar w yk ar 141w ar
HOUSING
INSPECTION 108,771 118,255 123,483
- There are no significant changes in this budget.
arwWwarararWarar,rarwakarWW
PARKS AND
RECREATION 51,492 81,734 89,096
ADMINISTRATION _ There are no significant changes in this budget.
, ar ar ar arar Yew ar arww ar ar yk ar w ar
RECREATION 786,361 784,053 909,794
- The increases in FY88 are due primarily to the cost of
operating the new pools for a portion of the fiscal
year. In addition, an appropriation of $6,000 was
provided to distribute the program announcements by
mail, as opposed to the newspaper. The City's cost to
operate the new pool ($37,775) is proposed to be
financed from hotel/motel tax revenue. This would
result in no tax revenue being receipted into the
Recreation Facilities Fund in FY88. In FY89, it is pro-
jected that the City will need to provide $42,200
of property tax revenues in addition to the hotel/motel
tax amount to fund the pool's annual operating costs.
air air W ar ar w ar ar ar arw W ar ar ar w ar
K Vz
FY86
FY87
FY88
Actual
Estimate
Proposed
HOUSING &
INSPECTION
SERVICES
61,178
80,907
90,757
ADMINISTRATION
_ There are
no significant changes in
this budget.
ar ar ar ar-*Year arwair ar w ar arg4w air
BUILDING
INSPECTION 163,061 174,237 183,755
- There are no significant changes in this budget.
r
at ar ak ar ak w ar w W ar ar w yk ar 141w ar
HOUSING
INSPECTION 108,771 118,255 123,483
- There are no significant changes in this budget.
arwWwarararWarar,rarwakarWW
PARKS AND
RECREATION 51,492 81,734 89,096
ADMINISTRATION _ There are no significant changes in this budget.
, ar ar ar arar Yew ar arww ar ar yk ar w ar
RECREATION 786,361 784,053 909,794
- The increases in FY88 are due primarily to the cost of
operating the new pools for a portion of the fiscal
year. In addition, an appropriation of $6,000 was
provided to distribute the program announcements by
mail, as opposed to the newspaper. The City's cost to
operate the new pool ($37,775) is proposed to be
financed from hotel/motel tax revenue. This would
result in no tax revenue being receipted into the
Recreation Facilities Fund in FY88. In FY89, it is pro-
jected that the City will need to provide $42,200
of property tax revenues in addition to the hotel/motel
tax amount to fund the pool's annual operating costs.
air air W ar ar w ar ar ar arw W ar ar ar w ar
K Vz
F>ARKs
10
FY86
Acual FY87
Est -
414,995 P r FY880`5�
448,687
The major operational 483,557
temporary employee Increase is to provide f
(3 562) or a
Provide general , to clean restrooms and
shelters, maintenance for persons renting our
As aseparate budget, it is recommended
the Recreation sitiilitees rve and that the
capital Provide $90,000 and
programs. The Projects are
for various
as follows:
P
arkland Acquisition Fund
Playground Equipment
Picnic
Tables
Barbeque Grills
10,000
3,000
Electricity to Shelters
Water to
2,500
Shelters
Plumbing Hickory Hill
5,000
1,500
Shelter
Resurface Tennis Courts
Mercer
3,000
park Softball Fields
49,000
16,000
Recreation Facilities
90,000
Fund
Repair Recreation Center Pool
Paint ceiling in
Gymnasium m
Repair Center Roof
16,500
15,000
The FY88 proposed budget does not include a transfer
of $10,000 to the Parkland Acquisition Fund reserve.
It Proved difficult to recommend set aside funds for
future park land acquisition when we do
not have
resources to properly maintain what
ak ak W�k Nrat ak slr �k WB now own.
1,203,602
1,263,649
1,313,895
The Libraryhebudget reflects the changes in service
recently announced by the Library Board (that is,
2 1 Closing on selected days). The budget requested
/2 full-time equivalent personnel at a cost of
budget
This amount has not been included in the
budget proposal.
scat ak ak ak �k ak ak ak ak W ak Vk ak ek Ilk *ak ak
,;� 02,
FY86
Actual
SENIOR CENTER 205,353
PARKING
POLLUTION
CONTROL
I
FY87
Estimate
222,227
FY88
Proposed
230,482
- There are no substantive changes within the proposed
Senior Center budget and, in fact, it may be necessary
for the Senior Center Commission and staff to critically
evaluate the programming that is being developed by the
Center staff and the current workload distribution.
This is not to say that the program, particularly those
that utilize volunteers, is not worthwhile. However,
each expanded effort is likely to require additional
staff time.
The Senior Center staff requested the expansion of the
Volunteer Specialist from one-half to full-time at a
cost of $14,439. In addition to the lack of funding,
the position was only recently recruited, and it would
seem that more than six months work experience is
necessary to.determine whether it would be desirable
to expand. Therefore, this expanded service has not
been recommendedAlso requested was a $5,000 appro-
priation for additional chairs in that they often find
it necessary to use chairs from offices to accommodate
some of their activities. This also has not been
included in the budget.
ik ar sr Kc ar ar ar ar �r ar ar it yfr,r yr yic>rr ar air
1,905,490 2,172,392
1,925,874
- There is no change in services provided, although the
system has noticeable declines in revenue and FY88
represents an inability to transfer any reserves to
transit. The FY87 estimate shows transfers of $200,000
to transit; this is a reduction from the original
budget amount of $430,500.
1,685,512 3,425,541
4,378,564
- The significant increases are due to the debt service
Payments required by the 1986 sewer revenue bond issue
of $38,950,000. Total debt service transfers amount
to $2,345,690 in FY87 and $3,264,050 in FY88.
4Z
12
FY86 FY87 FY88
Actual Estimate Proposed
WATER 1,927,130 2,074,940 2,120,110
- There are no significant changes in this budget.
,.r *,M, tk ak -Ar yr ok>k ak,re -k ]+k *'k W nk yk
REFUSE 564,657 569,892 620,347
COLLECTION
-There is no change in the level of service. However,
it is recommended that the charge for residential
service be increased by 4.5% from $4,30 to $4.50 per
month. Due to increases in the cost of landfill operations,
and a projection indicating that by FY90 the refuse
collection program would be using a portion of its
reserves for operating expenses, the increase in fees
is proposed. These costs also are influenced by State
legislation, such as that now being considered that
would provide more direct involvement in regulating
landfills throughout the State.
akW -*IAC W -At -* W*+e Wsk akw W WW ak 2k
LANDFILL 763,007 419,349 505,661
- It is anticipated that the State of Iowa will begin to
more strictly regulate landfills and therefore the City
must be prepared for these eventual legislative and/or
regulatory changes. In order to do so, it is recommended
that the reserve position of the landfill be increased
by increasing the per ton dumping charge at the landfill.
The increase proposed is from the current $7.75 per ton to
$8.00 per ton.
ye rk ak yrr ytr ak yt ak ak �r a4lk yr Mr yr �1r Kr ak ak '
AIRPORT 185,264 192,992 202,186
- There are no significant changes in the financing program
for the Airport. The Airport Commission, at the time of
budget preparation, is negotiating lease arrangements with
the Iowa City Flying Service. Although an enterprise
fund, general property tax for airport operations is
required. The tax support for FY88 is anticipated to be
$103,113 up from $100,630 in FY87.
aY ak*akw* *Warr do Warr 7r
4 •Z
13
-t
FY86 FY87
FY88
Actual Esti proposed
TRANSIT 2,181,254 2,029,166
1,853,421
- Significant service reductions and revenue adjustments
have been incorporated in the FY88 budget proposal. Also
note that the cost of insurance, formerly assigned to
the Tort Liability Levy, has been assigned to the Transit
Levy. The reductions/increase in fares are as follows:
I. Combine North Dubuque and Manville Heights routes.
2. Combine evening routes.
3. Reduce Saturday night service.
4. Hourly service all day on Seventh Avenue route.
5. Hourly midday service.
6. Increase monthly pass from $16 to $18.
r
7. Increase Saturday fare to 504 from 404•
The revenues for the system have been amended to
represent reductions/fare increases as well as
i,
Increased property tax support.
, arc air Nr arc at Nr yfc ak �k at at Nrat at a4 arr at ak
it
!' NON—OPERATIONAL
976,232 1,016,679 1,291,853
(' 1. JCCOG - The City's total funding share for JCCOG
is $86,166. $71,064 would be from the General
Fund property taxes and $15,102 from CDBG for
one-half the cost of the Human Service Coordinator
salary. This $15,102 reduces the available Aid
to Agencies/CDBG funds from $83,500 to $68,398.
The recommendation with respect to the Human
Service Coordinator salary is contrary to the
Committee on Community Needs (CCN) recommendation
that resources other than CDBG be used to pay the
salary.
r' 2. The Aid to Agencies budget is proposed at $118,398,
approximately 60% of the previous funding level.
The funds are derived from $68,398 from CDBG and
$50,000 from the General Fund. It is proposed
that the agencies be funded at the 60% level for FY88
to allow them at least some period of time next
fiscal year to seek other sources of income. It
is likely that CDBG will not be available for FY89
and FY89 expenditures for the General Fund would
be severely restricted. Therefore, all such agencies
receiving City funds should be on notice as soon
as possible to seek other alternatives.
4;z_
0^�
I
F
1
14
Big Brothers/Big Sisters 15,180
Crisis Intervention Center
Crisis Center Food Bank 5,279
5,604
Domestic Violence Project
7'920
Elderly Services Agency
HACAP 17,203
1,560
Mayor's Youth Employment 18,000
Rape Victim Advocacy
United Action for Youth 6,210
Willow Creek/Mark IV Zq,000
MECCA 6,150
Red Cross 6,000
600
^sa
113� 706
fia
Contingency 4,692
118,398
' 3. Enterprise Fund property tax subsidies
Transit Tax Levy
a; Transit (General Fund) 511,793320 000
Airport 103,113
4. Data Processing Equipment 40,000
5. Emergency repairs - HVAC 7,485
6. Contingency Account 120,000
� arc at at at at at at at at ak at atr at at at air at
CAPITAL PROJECTS
,i
f - The CIP (Capital Improvements Program) was prepared
with the goal of minimizing the amount of general
Ei1 obligation bonds issued prior to FY90. Debt service
costs peak in FY90 and then start to decrease as
pi the older bond issues are paid in full. Much of this
temporary increase is due to the two bond issues,
totaling $11,050,000, sold recently.
Debt service costs for which property taxes are levied,
net of the debt service on the swimming pool bonds,
will increase in FY89 15% over the FY88 costs. Then,
in FY90 costs will decrease by 18%. Future bond
issues and the scheduling of capital projects must be
managed to maintain the debt service property tax
funding at a more stable level from year to year.
This proposed CIP would require a bond issue of approxi-
mately $1.3 million in FY88 and a bond issue of $1 million
late in FY89.
.. '"P't a��r��r �r aY ye at arc Nr Yic rr rr at v�ati rr
0Z
al
a
MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS is
1. PUBLIC HOUSING - The City manages
62 units of
public housing. The FY88 budget
increase
proposes to
certain maintenance
expenses and will
require the use of reserves. While there is no
immediate need for
alarm, the use of reserves
for maintenance needs to be monitored
closely.
2. BICYCLE PATROL - During the course of the current
fiscal year, the issue of
a proposed police/
bicycle patrol was discussed. It
was determined
that the current staff needs/service request for
were
be am could ccommodated inolice
cthe hproposed at this pFY88abudget. not
3. INDUSTRIAL REVENUE BOND FEE SCHEDULE - Developers
who utilize IR8s
can expect in rate reductions
in the amount of 2+% interest
;y
points. Many cities
charge fees associated with the issuance of these
types of bonds, in
addition to the basic fee for
xling an
aone-tiime, 1%ifeeion ao$1p000e000nIRB wouldx
in (10,000 in
result
revenue to the City. This fee could
be easily accommodated by a
prospective developer
in a proposed IRB bond primarily due to the sig-
nificant savings that
is generated above that of
conventional financing. If the
Council were.
interested in such a proposal, a development fee
schedule can be
prepared.
4. BUSINESS LICENSE - In many cities, in particular
in California and Illinois
from my
city government has a program experience) the
of business licen-
?;
munitywmustbannualjesses operating within the com-
fe
:.,
amount of the fee generallylrange sensinfrome- The
;50 per year. As well to
as providing revenue to
the community, the business is required to
information
provide
concerning the general nature of their
operation. The type of information
required includes
iness tw�thinothe wing
and aotherout ocri ticalf the soperati
ons business �ts
location of storage and other
potentially dangerous
fire areas, etc. This information is then provided
to the Fire Department
and can be utilized in
intensified inspection efforts to
assure compli-
ance with all city ordinances. The information is
even more
critical to our fire response personnel;
when responding to a call, they are
more likely to be
aware of what they may experience at a particular
business location.
If the Council were interested
in such a program, fee and other inspection
could be prepared. schedules
y`1
:7i
J
16
MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS (continued)
5. STATE MUNICIPAL ASSISTANCE - This program could
be called "State Revenue Sharing" and is derived
from non -property tax sources. The possibility
Of continuation forFY88 is indefinite as it
appears inevitable that the State Legislature
will again consider reduction/elimination to solve
its own budget problems.The FY88 budget assumes
continuation of municipal assistance at $338,000.
6. SEWER PLANT/RECREATION SITE - As the City searches
for a new siderationlisabeingtin fgivenor thetor
recreationause ofn
nthe
surrounding. Metcalf and Eddy will be providing
for some very preliminary design work in their
current contract; however, no other funds have
been provided in the FY88 budget.
7. PROJECT HARD TIMES - No funds have been included
for the transit subsidy for providing passes to
Job seekers.
8. CITY FEES - All city established fees or charges
for service for General Fund activities will be
reviewed in Spring 1987. Fees were last increased
in January 1986 following the fee study of 1985.
In all likelihood, recommendations for fee increases
to cover inflationary increases in costs to provide
those services will be made to Council early in
FY88 for immediate implementation. It is unknown
how much additional revenue such fee increases
could generate, but it is expected to be minimal.
9. IMPOUNDMENT FEES - Consideration will be given to
the establishment of tow fees of $15 per vehicle
impounded for unpaid parking tickets. Potential
revenue could amount to $18,000 for the vehicles
towed charged nfor leach vehicleo
impounded byruse fee is tof the
Denver Boot. Consideration will be given to
increasing this fee to $30 as impoundment by boot
does save the vehicle owner at least $30 in tow
charges and requires more staff time than towing.
Potential additional annual revenue generated by
the increased fee is estimated at $2,000.
6VOL
Ni
17
MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS (continued)
10. SENIOR CENTER PARKING - Consideration can be given
to charging a fee for Senior Center parking permits.
This was recommended by the Senior Center Commission
approximately one year ago. It would appear to be
inconsistent to charge the elderly to rid
and get free parking in the a bus
downtown while they can drive their car downtown
e Senior Center Lot. There
are currently 3,000 Senior Center permit hold
$10,If only one half would pay the annual permit fee of ers.
additional revenue
This would replace a of $15,000 could be generated.
This small portion of the $1841000
now provided from property taxes for Senior Center
operations. The annual fee of $10 would not guarantee
thearightking to space or eachr an holder, but would provide
Center lot. The annual fee p y space in the Senior,
the regular monthly Parking favorably with
year. g permit cost of ;360 per
11. EXPANDED METER PARKING -
12.
Mercy Hospital Area
First Year. cost $4,515
East of CBD
Estimated Revenue 5,000
First Year Cost 18,9P5
Estimated Revenue 20,000
South of CBD
First Year Cost 14,500
Estimated Revenue 20,000
Eastside Dormitory Area First Year Cost 5,650
Estimated Revenue 10,000
FUND BALANCE - The expenditure budgets for FY87 and
costFY88 include a contingency amount plus salary and benefit
s at 100%. These result in an approximate 2%
ncrease to the expenditure budget for each year. The
contingency will be available for unbudgeted and
unplanned expenditures and/or revenue reduction during
the fiscal year. The addition of the contingency to
the budgets permits the identification of the year-
end pure fund balance which is an excellent indicator
Of the fund's working capital position or change in
annual financial status. The pure fund balance at
the end of FY86 is $1,049,815. It decreases to
$967,766 by year-end FY87 and further decreases to
$685,892 by the end of FY88.
4.z-
18
-t
MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS (continued)
13. THE BASIC PROGRAM OF MUNICIPAL SERVICES, other than
contributions to social support agencies and the
transit system, remains intact. The cost of the
City's program of services continues to rise (with-
out significant growth capacity) disproportionately
to our ability to raise revenues. The budget also
proposes to use reserves and other special funds
wherever possible, with payback schedules to be
incorporated in future budget years. The budget
proposes to use these special reserve funds for
primarily maintenance purposes. It was felt that
the City was in no position to anticipate expansion
k' of any of our services in the near future and that all
r� reasonable resources needed to be utilized to maintain
what we currently have.
There are no new full-time personnel incorporated
$j into the budget proposal, primarily due to the fact that
�d
we anticipate layoff of full-time personnel in our
transit operation.
50�
CITY
i-
i
I
_t
r
3�
R
M _
P R O P O S E D B U D G E T
FISCAL YEAR 1988
JULY 1, 1987 THRU JUNE 30, 1988
CITY OF IOWA CITY, IOWA
CITY COUNCIL
William J. Ambrisco, Mayor
John McDonald Larry Baker
Darrel Courtney Kate Dickson
George Strait Ernie Zuber
CITY MANAGER
Stephen J. Atkins
1 i;: 51r 5 39 I
iAh7isi1irtlaa .,tj 7tSf}t b'��d 4jt i�le=i}�J.cr..; 'I`
.. crnt nnrrc nro rnmr.n
F
i
J
i
ORGANIZATIONAL CHART
FINANCIAL POLICIES FOR THE OPERATING BUDGET
BUDGET OVERVIEW:
General Governmental Operations
Enterprise Funds
CHARTS AND SUMMARIES:
General Fund Reserves
General Fund Summary
General Fund Expenditures Summary
Financial Summary - FY87
Projected Financial Summary - FY88
Impact of
Inflation Chart
Summary,of Expenditures 8 Receipts
- Charts
Authorized Personnel
ITransfers
- In
Transfers - Out
Expanded Service Level Requests
GENERAL FUND:
Policy 8 Administration Program:
Administrative Receipts
J
City Council
City Clerk
City Attorney
-1
J
Economic Development
City Manager
Human Relations
Broadband Telecommunications
Finance Administration
Accounting
Centralprocurement Services
Treasury
Word Processing
CITY OF IOWA CITY
FISCAL YEAR 1988
PROPOSED OPERATING BUDGET
TABLE 0=
01
PAGE
I
2 ,
5
16
.I
19
23
24
25
26;.
27
28
31 n
33
35
38
42
43
45
47
49
51
53
55
57
59 i 61
63
65
Data Processing
Risk Management
Government Buildings
Civil Rights
Non -operational Administration
Home and Community Environment Program:
Planning and Program Development:
Administration
Urban Planning S Development
Engineering
Public Works Adninistration
C.B.D. Maintenance
Energy Conservation
Traffic Engineering
Street System Maintenance
Forestry/Horticulture
Cemetery
Community Protection Program:
Police:
Administration
Patrol
Criminal Investigation
Records and Identification
Crossing Guards 8 Emergency Operations
Fire
Animal Control
Housing b Inspection Services:
Administration
Building Inspection
Housing Inspection
Human Development Programs:
Recreation
Parks;.
Library
Parks 3 Rec. Admin.
Senior Center
76
78
80
82
84
86
88
90
92
94
96
98
100
102
104
106
108
110
112
114
116
118
120
122
124
G3
67
69
q�
70
72
74
76
78
80
82
84
86
88
90
92
94
96
98
100
102
104
106
108
110
112
114
116
118
120
122
124
G3
01
ENTERPRISE FUNDS:
Parking Revenue:
Parking Operations . .. . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . 126
Parking Reserves . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . .. . . . . . 129
Pollution Control Revenue:
Pollution Control Operations . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . 133
Pollution Control Reserves . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . 136
Water Revenue:
Water Operations . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . .. . . . . . 142
Water Reserves . . . . . . . .
Refuse Collection Operations
. . . . . . .. . . . . . 145
148
Landfill:
Landfill Operations . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . .. . . . . . 150
l
Landfill Reserves . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . .. . . . . . 152
Airport:
Airport Operations . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . .. . . . . . 155
—I
Airport Reserves .. . . . . . .
. . . . . . .. . . . . . 158
Public Transit:
Public Transit Operations . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . 159
Public Transit Reserves . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . .. . . . . . 162
J
DEBT SERVICE FUND:
Fund Summary . . . .
. . . . . . .. . . . . . 163
Summary of Expenditures . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . 164
TRUST AND AGENCY FUND:
Fund Summary . . . . . . ..
. . . . . .. . . . . . 165
SPECIAL REVENUE.FUNDS:
Road Use Tax . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . .. . . . . . 167
Federal Revenue Sharing . . . . . . . .
. . . .. . .. . . . . . 169
J.C.C.O.G.
Administration . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . 171
J
Transportation Planning
114
176
Rural Planning . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . .
Human Services Planning . . . . . . . .
. . . .. . . . . . . . . 178
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT:
Summary of Expenditures
180
Rental Rehab
. . . . . . . . . . 182
;.
I•
.. . . . . . .
Metro Entitlement . . . . . . . .
. . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . 185
01
FUND:
V
INTRAGOVERNMENTAL SERVICE
Assisted Housing:
, , 188
Section 8 Existing • ' .. .. ..
, , •
..190
-+
i
Public Housing Turnkey
. . . , , 192
I
I
Section 8 Vouchers
, . • , , 193
Equipment • " " ..
"196
Central Supply 8 Print • ' • • • ' '
• ' ' ' ' ' '
Ali
t
`
�
I
I
NJI
fl
T
G3
-1
CITY OF IOWA
CITY
CNIC CEN(ER 410 E. WASHINGTON ST. IOWA CITY, IOWA 52240 (319) 356-50CU
City Council
City of Iowa City
Iowa City, Iowa 52240
' Mayor and Councilmembers:
t..
As expected, we have experienced a great deal of difficulty in balancing the FY88
r budget. The City's program of services, that which the community now enjoys, will
continue to experience financial difficulties if it is to continue to be financed by
W our current program of revenue. With Federal and State resources disappearing, the
revenues which once supplementedour program of services are now no longer available
j and we are seeing serious competition among service providers for limited City re-
sources. This competition, in most circumstances a healthy situation, is now causing
;r consternation and frustration among all of those affected. There appears to be little
! hope for any fiscal policy change on the part of the state and federal government that
a would cause any turnaround in these circumstances, and therefore it will be particu-
larly critical' in your evaluation of the FY88 budget to determine the breadth and scope
i'
of the package of services that we are to provide with our limited resources.
a Most often the budget is perceived to be an annual agony that we must endure. It is
not likely that we will see change in statutory requirements or the community pressures
t brought to bear upon the City government from interest groups. Therefore it seems
inevitable that this struggle for resources will continue well into our future.
t
Thelaws that govern the budget preparation process, as well as the State imposed re-
strictions on revenues, will often cause us to look at our budget in the short term
j (annual agony), when in fact we should view any program of expenditures and revenues
J over the long run. As community interest groups debate the merits of a particular
program and the City Council is challenged to seek long-term solutions to these issues,
our fiscal policy proposals (many times imposed upon us) are mere stopgap short-term
solutions. It is my judgment that our program of City services cannot continue at its
current level with the resources that are available and a critical goal for the near
term will be to stabilize the program of services at an affordable level and educate
the community as to limits that are placed upon their city government.
i_
Wide swings in fiscal and program policies appear to be inevitable consequences of the
i Federal and State political process. As a local government, we must guard ourselves
I� against those congressional/legislative whims that affect our ability to provide a
program of municipal service as well as the requirements that we have to fulfill state
-I
�+
and federal mandates. Our program of aiding social service agencies is a example of
our response to federal fiscal policy. We accept the funds in the short run and then
as our community becomes accustomed to receiving the services that are financed di-
rectly by the federal government, we are faced with the long-term consequences of
service reduction decisions. Aid to various social support programs is important to the
,
quality of life and character of our community, but is measured in the short run
against continued receipt of federal aid. Our Community Development Block Grant Pro-
gram, which is an integral part of the City's ability to pursue a program of safe and
sanitary housing throughout our community, could at some time in the future, as is
currently being discussed by the federal government, be subjected to congressional
changes and thereby this program could experience a similar fiscal distress that is now
being imposed upon area social service agencies.
No better example of the critical impact of Federal and State fiscal policies is that
-
on our transit system. It is difficult to determine at this time the full impact of
transit service reductions; however, it is clear that we have traditionally utilized
Federal and State resources to underwrite both the operating and capital cost of our
L_
transit system. We have, over the years, created a transit dependent component of our
citizenry within our 'local economy and yet we have seen a dramatic fall-off in our
ridership. Our traditional response is similar to that of many other communities
facing similar transportation crises, that is, if there is a decline in participation
in a service by our citizens, it is an indication of a lack of community support and
thereby we should move to reduce that service accordingly. Conventional
economic/fiscal policy would lead to such a decision but simultaneously we must con-
sider as with all of our other City services, it is an integral part of the quality and
character of our community. If we were to experience a lull in the number of fire calls
or other emergency requests, I suspect that we would not reduce our program of fire
suppression capabilities and similar analogies can be made to our police services and
other programs within what is thought of as our traditional package of municipal serv-
ice. This is the dilemma that we face. We have a broad program of public service that
has been accepted and expected by our community, and recently expanded, through the
r ':
addition of capital and operating costs for new swimming pools, and yet the City does
not have the resources to assure the long-term financing capacity for such programs.
b�
Unless we can provide for an expanded revenue base, serious expenditure reductions in
all of our services are likely to continue well into our future and the annual agony
will reoccur time and time again. The continuing erosion of such services would also
have a dramatic effect upon the community as we now know it. With the growing citizen
complaints associated with property taxation, it does not appear that it could be ex-
panded to meet the service requests/revenue reductions imposed by the state and federal
policies and state tax limitations. Permanent, growth oriented revenues that would be
subject to economic fluctuations, both positive and negative, are necessary to assure
that we can eliminate our overdependence upon one primary source of revenue (property
tax) and avoid the above scenario being imposed upon the community.
-7
In the public debates associated with local government budgets, we find ourselves
preoccupied by a limited number of constituent groups. These groups are making their
case with respect to their service requests and are afforded, as they should be, an
opportunity to compete for limited resources. We must, however, keep in mind that our
J basic service program should not be significantly sacrificed. For example, in this
budget, it was determined after extensive review that our fire equipment is reaching a
precarious position with respect to the safety of the personnel that utilize the equip-
ment as well as our ability to respond in a quality manner to citizen requests or fire
J and rescue service. The budget recommends over ;450,000 in spending to provide for
replacement fire equipment. Our police facility and its obvious deficiencies as well
as the general program of services that was proposed by department directors also were
reviewed and it was determined that given our fiscal limitations, no significant expan-
sion could be provided. This was a particularly critical decision in that we must
monitor the traditional services as well as those that are often associated with fed-
eral and state support, for these traditional services have even a greater influence on
-- the character and quality of our community.
The City government is called upon to be an active participant in economic development
ig and play an integral part in the local economy. We are often criticized for insuffi-
cient economic development efforts, and 1 would like to point out that the City has
v
The City also needs to build stronger financial reserves so that we are able to "ride
out" economic/ legislative fluctuations that often occur and cause the resultant dra-
matic shifts in our ability to provide service. Transit is again a clear example of a
service that is experiencing declines, but due to the fact that there are no reasonable
reserves available to finance gradual changes in service, we are faced with a yearly
crisis and the likelihood of severe reductions given other service demands, is our only
option. Support groups will point to the fact that the City does have the authority
_
under the State law to provide for additional property tax support for the transit
system, however, utilizing maximum tax support for any program should be the last
resort, for it simply continues the fiscal brinkmanship that is being imposed upon us
at this time. If we were to choose maximum taxation, it is suggested that it only be
done so with the understanding that we are attempting to build a healthy financial
future and not use the tax support for a year -by -year stopgap solution. In the case of
transit, with the state property tax limitations, and in conjunction with ridership and
revenue declines, it is unlikely that even maximum tax support can provide short-term,
let alone long-term, financial solutions.
JThe
budget needs to be a long-term plan for a program of services that can be reasona-
bly financed in the future and thereby our service package needs to have an element of
stability as well as the capability to provide for moderate growth that we will con-
tinue to experience. It would also allow us to adapt to the changing economic, politi-
cal, social and environmental issues within our community.
In the public debates associated with local government budgets, we find ourselves
preoccupied by a limited number of constituent groups. These groups are making their
case with respect to their service requests and are afforded, as they should be, an
opportunity to compete for limited resources. We must, however, keep in mind that our
J basic service program should not be significantly sacrificed. For example, in this
budget, it was determined after extensive review that our fire equipment is reaching a
precarious position with respect to the safety of the personnel that utilize the equip-
ment as well as our ability to respond in a quality manner to citizen requests or fire
J and rescue service. The budget recommends over ;450,000 in spending to provide for
replacement fire equipment. Our police facility and its obvious deficiencies as well
as the general program of services that was proposed by department directors also were
reviewed and it was determined that given our fiscal limitations, no significant expan-
sion could be provided. This was a particularly critical decision in that we must
monitor the traditional services as well as those that are often associated with fed-
eral and state support, for these traditional services have even a greater influence on
-- the character and quality of our community.
The City government is called upon to be an active participant in economic development
ig and play an integral part in the local economy. We are often criticized for insuffi-
cient economic development efforts, and 1 would like to point out that the City has
undertaken significant steps with respect to economic development, such as the issuance
of industrial development revenue bonds (over $100 million in the last 6 years), eco-
nomic development financial incentives, participation in and the funding of regional
economic development agencies, as well as providing a traditional package of municipal
services, critical to the continued success of our business community.
As any large employer, the City employees and the payroll generated has an effect on
our local economy. I would like to believe that the City budget is far more than a
program of services and a reason to have local tax dollars spent, for the City budget
also contributes significantly to the local economy. We currently have an employee
payroll of over $11.3 million and $500,000 was paid by our employees to the State of
Iowa in income tax withholding, $1.6 million in federal income tax withholding, and
$600,000 as the employees' share of social security. Adjustments certainly can be made
to our overall program of services, but we must keep in mind that the removal of any
significant funding, whether it be tax supported or not, can have a long lasting effect
on our local economy. It is estimated that the City government purchases over $7
million annually in goods and services in the area economy. We also need to be con-
cerned about the fact that student enrollment in the 90's is projected to be signifi-
cantly lower than the current enrollment at the University and therefore could have a
particularly significant effect on the commercial/retail component in the economy. We
must prepare and anticipate economic changes and thereby the City's efforts in economic
development and growth must be sustained as well as, a program of revenue, more eco-
nomically sensitive, can be pursued.
The average residential property tax payer who owns a home valued at $68,450, currently
pays $1,416 annually in property tax support to the City, County, Schools and State
governments. Of that taxation, City services require 39% or $549. The proposed FY88
budget would increase the annual property tax for City services to $612. On a monthly
basis, property taxes would increase from the current rate of $45.78 to $50.96, an
increase of 11.3%.
We have now reached a point in our overall long-term financial planning that short-term
solutions are no longer practical, let alone available. I believe we cannot continue to
patch together a program of municipal service and we must chart a course over the next
decade to prepare for eventual changes in the character and quality of our community
with respect to reduction in City services. As a goal of the City Council, I have been
directed to prepare options, choices, etc. with respect to conceptualizing an "image
2000" of the City. The image and the proposals that are prepared will be significantly
affected by the quality of City services. Assuming a well -funded program of City serv-
ices, a projection indicating an image of health and growth can be identified. Con-
tinuing dilution of City services as well as the economic changes anticipated by
declines in student enrollment could project an entirely different image.
I
J
In an effort to pursue a program as well as attend to our financial concerns, I would
suggest the City Council create a citizens ad hoc committee to determine the desirabil-
ity of pursuing local tax options in light of the City's financial position and the
potential for dramatic changes in our program of services over the next decade. It
would be my recommendation that the Committee be made up of a broad spectrum of citizen
interests and they convene and discuss the City's present revenue projections, program
of services, and other expenditure considerations so that the Committee may advise the
Council as to the desirability of pursuing local tax options.
Sincerely yours,
Steph . At f s
City n er
January, 1967
-t
#6
I
ORGANI :A'1'IONAL S'I'RIIC'TIIRI:
POR IOWA CHIS GOVERNMENT
I
�.
r i
MAGM
I
I I
PoDlZcw I
PAMMI1RIncAla _.
rAna
xmrtfcaimlunan
Atwltmmra ._ ;
aorwuw ;
ASSISTANT
CITY NANACDR
IrWIWO RLLmMPKnIO6 I ,
AYl NNII
11RIC1(fAYrtA191 '
2WAIIIIMIIIlIWK[ �
HEWN
RW T06 DIRECTOR
4tol w mn
KEY 't
TRANNT MANAGER 0
.Waal arunonf ELECTED OFFICIALS
MMIC WORKS
DIRECTOR
Aa mm
u im
1 ftrtenlAnnAnon
aumtuawunc
rAlp
(MAYOR ELECTED BY COUNCIL)
APPOINTED BY COUNCIL & MA7DR
IMIAMIS
DIRECTOR OR MANAGER EMPLOYED
BY BOARD OR COMMISSION
Y7
A'
{a
Cm
IYIMMISNONS CITY
O.LRIE
I ,.
AMIRN6Y
L®RARY
DIRECTOR
T
AORK
I
O
RN4)CE DRECTOI
�
noganAla
x
�*
•�
-PamINCaivc
.rAninc
GTYCWNCIL
D
MAWR
1
IIOIISING & INSPECTION
CITID)!S OE
DIRECTOR
IOWA CITY
Wrrttr.A r
aacrertcnen }
svmoxcono -,•
ancmwrnon
PARKS& RECREATION
DIRECTOR
Cm RLINAf,E l
I
ORGANI :A'1'IONAL S'I'RIIC'TIIRI:
POR IOWA CHIS GOVERNMENT
I
�.
r i
MAGM
I
I I
PoDlZcw I
PAMMI1RIncAla _.
rAna
xmrtfcaimlunan
Atwltmmra ._ ;
aorwuw ;
ASSISTANT
CITY NANACDR
IrWIWO RLLmMPKnIO6 I ,
AYl NNII
11RIC1(fAYrtA191 '
2WAIIIIMIIIlIWK[ �
HEWN
RW T06 DIRECTOR
4tol w mn
KEY 't
TRANNT MANAGER 0
.Waal arunonf ELECTED OFFICIALS
MMIC WORKS
DIRECTOR
Aa mm
u im
1 ftrtenlAnnAnon
aumtuawunc
rAlp
(MAYOR ELECTED BY COUNCIL)
APPOINTED BY COUNCIL & MA7DR
DIRECTOR OR MANAGER EMPLOYED
BY BOARD OR COMMISSION
Y7
DEPARTMENT/ADMINISTRATIVE
HEAD APPOINTED BY CITY
{a
MANAGER
® ,
-OPERATING BUDGET UNITS
I ,.
G3
=�
FINANCIAL POLICIES FOR THE OPERATING BUDGET
SCOPE
The purpose of this section is to present the policies that the City of Iowa City follows in managing its
financial and budgetary affairs for the Operating Budget. The funds involved are the General fund
Debt Service fund, the Enterprise fund, the Trust and A enc fund
governmental Services fund, and the Special Revenue fund. Most of these policies are not new, bthe ut Intra-
sent long-standing principles and traditions which have guided the City aPolicinsion esin the are
Retirement
have, allowed tthe
City to maintain nits financial stability.
POLICIES
I. Balanced Budget
1. The operating budget of the City of Iowa City shall be drawn so that available resources and
anticipated expenditures are equal.
2. The City will maintain an unreserved balance at year-end at a level determined by Council to fund
cash flow requirements in the first quarter of a fiscal year.
II. Revenues
I. Property Taxes
A. General Tax Levy
The budget of the City of Iowa City shall be drawn so that the general tax levy does not exceed
limits established by State law.
B. Debt Service Levy
Taxes shall be levied each year under the Debt Service Levy in the amount equal to the general
obligation principal and interest due in t
the enterprise funds. hat same year, net of the portion abated or paid by
C. Tort Liability Levy
The City levies for the expected costs of one year's premiums on property and liability
insurance policies held by the City.
2
-I
sT•-
V
0. Trust and Agency Levy
The City shall levy under Trust and Agency for:
1. The City's share of contributions to police and fire pension and retirement systems, at
rates determined by an actuary, for current sworn officers.
2. The City's share of contributions for employee benefits budgeted under the General Fund
only if the general tax levy is equal to the maximum levy established by State law.
E. Transit Levy
Taxes levied under the transit levy shall not exceed the limit established by State law. Tax
revenues from the transit levy will be receipted into the General Fund then transferred to the
Transit Fund.
2. Fees and Charges
The City will establish fees and charges in accordance with revenue bond requirements or for
covering all er part of the related costs of providing the services. The City will review fees and
charges, at a minimum, on a biannual basis.
3. Investments
The City will invest 100E of idle funds and will obtain the best possible return on all cash
investments within the limits of the State law.
4. Intergovernmental Revenue
Revenues from local, State and Federal governments will be used according to the restrictions or
intent placed on each.
5. Additional Revenue Sources
The City will continue to search for additional revenues as a method of balancing its budget.
III. Expenditures
1. Current Service Level
Maintaining the current level of services will receive first priority for funding.
2. Cost Effective Programs
The City will encourage technology and capital investment programs which are cost effective and
reduce operating expenses.
3
4.5
3. Infrastructure and Equipment V ii
it
The City will continue the scheduled level of maintenance and replacement for its infrastructure
and equipment.
4. Reductions
i
I
To balance the budget, the City will attempt to avoid reductions. if the situation arises, consid-
eration will be given first to alternatives which avoid employee layoffs, resist cuts in service
and establish user fees. -
I
IV. Economic Development i.
I
The City will take active measures to encourage economic development of the community with the intent
of increasing jobs and the tax base.
V. Debt Service
1. Purpose of Debt
Debt will fund capital improvement projects; it will not be used for annual operating expenses.
2. Debt Limit
The total general obligation debt will not exceed 5% of the total assessed value of real property. • "
C
O,� 4
BUDGET OVERVIEW
Consistent with the practice of previous
years, all Federal and State revenues continues to require a conservative approach W
tant to ensure that the level of revenue projected conservative
ative materialize venue estimates are conservative. The uncertainty r -
PP In budget preparation it is impor- '
Depmany
artment budget requests were made for the same service level as was provided in FY87. In addition W
departments submitted Expanded Service Level (ESL) requests, limited resources allowed —
funding of a minimum number of ESL's. A listing of all ESL's follows this Budget Overview. for approval and
GENERAL 60VERNNENTAL OPERATIONS
General Governmental Operations consist of the General Fund, the Debt Service Fund, the Trust A Agency Fund, r
the Equipment Maintenance Fund and the Special Revenue Funds.
A. PROPERTY TAX
The City's property tax request of $12,336,371 for FY88 will be levied as follows:
FY86 FY87
Assessment FY88
Dollars Per (1000 Dollars Assessment
Per $1000 Dollars Assessment
General Per E1000 -
Trust E Agency 7.247,084• 7.510 7,555,463* .l
Subtotal 664 657 .693 438,917 7'107 7.603,433** 7.111
Tort Liability7.91 ,741 8.203 7,994,380 415 757,208 .709
Debt Service 355,300 .370 882,438 7'522 8,360,641 7.220
Transit 1.872,145 1.952 2,003,195 1.892 753,438 712
345 354 360 2,700,618 2.536
Subtotal ,380 077_ x.360 511 793ff
481 �
Ag. Bldgs. 8 Land 9 ---- +i cuu OVU - _'_ '4 1-f 5`
,508 _d_� v� '
_3._0_0_4 _ 9,702 3,004 1
Total 10 494 048 =_ — 9,881 _3.004
11 269 792
'°11194,048 -9919
=-±1 ='191 12 336,371
*Includes monies and credits of $28,816 and military credit of $13,800•
"*Includes monies and credits of $28,416 and military credit of $13,800•
Total assessed valuation for Iowa City has decreased due to the completed phase-out of personal property
Ptaxation. The state will provide a partial replacement of monies that previously were derived from the
lessoinitax revenue due to the phase-out. ent stimates show that Iowa City will receive approximately $200,000
5 -
G3
If
1 J
V
Total assessed valuation, net of personal property valuations, in Iowa City increased from $1,217,907,203
for FY87 to $1,239,781,694 for FY88, or an increase of 1.8%. The majority of the increase, 1.5%, resulted
from growth in real property (new construction). This is a diminishing increase as real property growth
has ranged from 4.3% to 1.7% in the past five years with the average annual growth rate being 2.6%.
The taxable valuation is computed by applying the State's rollback factor to the total assessed valuation.
The rollback factor is designed to limit taxable valuation for the State, as a whole, to a 4% annual
increase. The County Auditor makes adjustments to property valuations and applies the rollback factors,
and property credits to arrive at the taxable valuations. For the debt service levy, the property credits
for tax increment financing (TIF) districts are added back to the valuations. For FY87, Iowa City's
taxable valuation, net of the personal property tax valuation, for the debt service levy was
$1,027,586,304 and was $1,025,936,855 for all other levies. The net taxable valuation for FY88 is
estimated to be $1,064,978,688 for the debt service levy and $1,063,312,745 for all other levies.
This proposed budget will result in an 11.3% increase in City property taxes for the average residential
property owner. General City services were allowed a 6% increase in property taxes while the debt service
costs on the swimming pool bond issue, approved by voters in June 1986, require a 5.3% increase in
property taxes. The following chart shows how property taxes for the average residential property will be
affected by the property tax levy recommended in the proposed budget. The average residential assessed
valuation used in this chart is based on information obtained from the City Assessor.
CITY PROPERTY TAXES FOR
AVERAGE RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY
FY88 INCREASE
FY86
FY87
FY88
OVER FY87
AVERAGE RESIDENTIAL
ASSESSED VALUATION
1-1-84
$65,754
1-1-85
$68,450
0%
1-1-86
$68,450
ROLLBACK FACTOR
.724832
.756481
.773604
2.3%
TAXABLE VALUATION
$47,661
$51,781
$52,953
2.3%
LEVY - ACTUAL/PROJECTED
10.885
10.609
11.549
8.9%
PROPERTY TAXES
£518_79
£549_34
$611_55
11.3%
The City also will receive revenue from taxes on agricultural buildings and land located within the City
limits. As provided by State law, the tax this
on property is $3.00375 per $1000 of assessed value. The
assessed taxable value for agricultural property is $3,289,203
and will yield revenue of $9,881.
Property taxes which fund General Fund operations will increase
I
levies: 2.7% in FY88 and include the following
FY86 FY87 FY88
General $7,247,084 $7,555,463 $7,603,433
Tort Liability 355 300
882,438
Trust & Agency 664657 438,917 753,438
Ag, Bldgs & Land 9508 9 702 759881
Another source of revenue used for General Fund operation is the Monies and Credits replacement fund.
Formerly a state law levied a tax
^
on certain monies and credits and monied capital. This tax was repealed
and the State established a replacement fund which
provides to cities the approximate amount of revenue
being received at the time the tax was repealed. In FY88, the City will
receive $28,416.
A Military Service Credit replacement has been established by the State which returns to cities
the property tax lost to the Military
part of
Service Tax Credit. In FY88, this fund will return $13,800 to Iowa
City for General Fund purposes. These monies are appropriated to
I
cities by the State Treasurer in
proportion to the money allocated by the State for the military service tax credit.
The General Fund property tax levy is used for the support of many services, such as police, fire,
library, park and recreation services. The
L
levy cannot exceed $8.10 per $1000 of assessed valuation. In
FY88, the levy will be $7.111.
a
a`1
The City also levies property tax for other purposes. These include Trust & Agency, Tort Liability,
Transit and Debt Service. These funds can be utilized
}
only for the purpose for which they are levied.
The Trust 8 Agency property tax levy is used for the payment of pension and employee benefits. These
include social security (FICA), the Iowa Public
a�
H
Employees Retirement System (IPERS), the Police and Fire
Pension contributions, health insurance, life insurance,
worker's compensation insurance premiums and
unemployment compensation. State regulations allow cities to budget for FICA, (PERS, health
life insurance
p)
insurance and
under the Trust d Agency Levy only when the $8.10 maximum levy has been reached in the
General Levy. In FY88, the General
�J
wj<+.
Levy is below the maximum levy limit, so Iowa City will be paying
these benefit costs out of the General Levy. Police and Fire
Retirement contributions, worker's compensa-
tion insurance premiums, and unemployment compensation costs will be from
paid the Trust & Agency Levy in
Y.i
J
w�
FY88. This levy decreased substantially for FY87 as a result of building a balance in the fund due to
decreasing contribution rates of the Police and Fire Retirement Funds. The levy will return to a normal
level in FY88.
A special levy, Tort Liability, is provided to pay the cost of certain insurance coverage which is
'
_
budgeted under Risk Management. This includes comprehensive general liability, motor vehicle liability,'
public official liability, errors and omissions, and false arrest insurance. The City did not purchase
—
umbrella insurance in FY87 and will end the year with a balance in tort liability. In FY87, the insurance
costs for Transit were levied under Tort Liability. But in FY88, the Transit Levy is being increased to
j
pay for insurance on the Transit System which allows the Tort Liability levy to decrease.
_
State law permits the use of a Transit Levy for funding the operation of a municipal transit system. The
'
levy cannot exceed $,54 per $1000 of assessed valuation. The levy will be $.481 for FY88: $.360 is the
;J
levy for operations and the increase of $.121 will raise $129,000 to pay for insurance on the Transit
System.
p,
The Debt Service levy provides funds for the payment of the principal and interest an general obligation
bonds of the City. It can also be utilized to fund the payment of any judgments against the City, unless
other funding sources are provided by State law. The FY88 budget includes debt service payments for the
ry
swimming pool bond issue which was approved by the voters in June 1986. The bonds were sold in July
1986. Debt service costs for this issue for both FY87 and FY88 ($585,875) will be levied in FY88. In
"
future years, the debt service cost for the swimming pool issue will be approximately $400,000 annually.
The FY88 levy includes debt service for a $1.3 million bond issue to be sold mid -year to finance the Scott
j�
Boulevard Project, the Dubuque Road Project, traffic signals and sidewalk construction.
M
1
B. GENERAL FUND — REVENUES OTHER THAN PROPERTY TAX
1. Intergovernmental Revenue
Assistance from other governmental agencies is a major source of revenue. This includes both Federal
r
J
and State assistance, Some of these funds are distributed according to population. Iowa City's
population is 50,508, as reported in the 1980 Census.
a, The bank franchise tax is a State tax levied on the net income of financial institutions. The
State retains 55% of this tax with the remainder divided with 60% to the city and 40% to the
county within which it originated. The FY88 projection of $50,000 is based upon actual receipts
in past years.
J
b. Liquor profits are 10% of gross revenue of State liquor stores. In FY87, the estimate was based
on $5.90 per capita ($297,997). In FY88 the estimate is $5.50 per capita ($277,794). The
decrease is attributable to the elimination of state liquor stores,
til , S
8
w�
c. State Municipal Assistance is distributed to cities on a ratio of each city's population to total
State population. This payment cannot exceed one-half of the city's property tax levy. The FY88
projection is based on $6.69 per capita ($337,899). Both the amount and continuation of the
program in FY88 will be a topic of discussion for the State Legislature in the current session.
d. The City of Iowa City is responsible for maintenance of all financial records for the Johnson
County Council of Governments (JCCOG). The JCCOG budget is included in the City's budget. Total
funding needed by JCCOG in FY88 amounts to $155,876 with Iowa City's share being $86,166. Of that
amount, $15,102 will come from CDBG monies for the Human Services Coordinator's salary and the
remainder will come from General Fund property taxes.
e. Road Use Tax collected by the State from the registration of motor vehicles, fuel tax, license
fees and the use tax on motor vehicles, trailers and accessories and equipment is apportioned to
each city based upon a ratio of the city's population to all Iowa cities. The per capita estimate
for FY88 is $35.25 ($1,780,407).
f. The balances of three reserves provided funding for various Recreation, Parks and Cemetery
expenditures. Monies will be transferred from the Perpetual Care Trust Fund for Cemetery
expenditures for a turf truckster ($7,000), a sump pump ($360), hedge trimmers ($280) and an
addition to the building ($12,000). A transfer from the Parkland Acquisition Reserve will fund
various Parks expenditures amounting to $90,000 and a transfer of $58,500 from the Recreation
Facilities Reserve will finance Recreation expenditures. The specific Parks and Recreation
expenditures are detailed in the following information on expenditures -transfers in Section C-5.
The use of the reserves balances will be considered a loan to be repaid from the General Fund over
a five year period resulting in annual repayments of $33,628.
2. Other Revenue
The City establishes service charges both by contract and fee schedules. The Fire Department revenues
include the fire protection contract with the University of Iowa ($418,371 to the General Fund and $94,465
to the Trust 6 Agency Fund for a total of $512,836) and Library services include $131,390 for services to
Johnson County, 10% of the Library's operating budget. Recreation revenue of $376,792 includes admis-
sions, lessons, entry fees and pool revenue. Other revenue is derived from activities such as police
escort service, animal control fees, zoning and subdivision fees.
In FY88, revenue from licenses and permits is budgeted at $347,015. Most of this revenue will come from
building and rental permits or beer and liquor permits and licenses. Other sources of revenue are
peddler's, electrician's, plumber's and animal licenses and burial permits.
The FY88 budgeted revenue from fines and forfeitures of $350,828 includes $162,000 for parking fines,
library fines of $71,600 assessed for overdue or damaged property, and $117,228 collected by the magis-
trate's court for violation of the City or State codes such as motor vehicle violations and animal control
violations.
DI
Use of money and property revenue comes from various sources. Interest income ($100,000) is projected at
a 7.5% interest yield. General Fund miscellaneous revenues are composed of refunds, reimbursements of
expenses and damages, miscellaneous sales and commissions or concessions. The commission from the cable
TV franchise fee is projected to be $96,298. The remaining miscellaneous revenues total $24,841 for all
41 operating divisions, an average of $600 per division.
C. GENERAL FUND - EXPENDITURES
The proposed General Fund budget is $16,303,825 or an increase of 8.7% over the FY87 budget.
of percentage changes by major classification of expenditure follows: A comparison
—
Actual
Estimate
%
Budget
%
FY86
FY87
Change
FY88
Chance
Personal Services
Commodities
f 8,400,849
512,020
$ 9,593,480
14.2%
$10,117,763
5.5%
Services & Charges
Capital Outlay
3,181,134
610,648
2,933,045
19.3%
(7.8%)
619,006
2,970,342
1.4%
1.3%
831,090
1,041,395
666,092
994,395
(19.9X)
(4.5%
1,295,268
94.5%
i Contingency
— TOTAL
_ _
199 155
)
100.0%
1,181,446
120 000
18.8%
(39.7%)
- -+fi9
i5
7.4%HMM
I. Personal Services
Personnel costs are primarily controlled by collective bargaining agreements. Employees of the City
arerepresented by three unions: AFSCME (Local /183), the Police Labor Relations Organization of Iowa
temCi porary and otherInternational
employeesAssociation
excludedFirefighters
law in(Local
Chapter 20are
)of the Code of Iowa confidential,
from the units and from the terms, conditions or application of the Agreement.
J
The majority of City employees is represented by AFSCME. This Union is comprised of two bargaining
—, units, one composed exclusively of Library employees and the other composed of employees in all other
departments. AFSCME is currently covered by a two-year contract, ending June 30, 1987. Negotiations
for a new contract are in progress.
ISworn
police officers are represented by
bargaining unit is
the
Police Labor Relations Organization
of Iowa City. The
composed of all Iowa
chiey
City
police officers. Exempt from the
administrative,
unit are the police
thanfhalf-timecemployees. The PolicenOfficersother
Negotiations for a contract effective
Unionchasiaetwo year contract
sendsvJuney30,'dless
1987.
for
FY88
are now underway.
Q
10
The firefighters are represented by the International Association of Firefighters. The bargaining —
unit is composed of firefighters, lieutenants, and captains. Exempt from the unit are the fire chief,
fire marshal and battalion chiefs. The firefighters contract ends June 30, 1987. Negotiations
concerning a new contract are proceeding. -
Employees who are administrative, supervisory or otherwise ineligible for collective bargaining are
covered by the Personnel Rules and Regulations. Some are eligible for Civil Service. Salaries and
benefits are determined by the City Council upon the recommendation of the City Manager.
Salaries and benefits (personal services costs) are being carried at full cost in both the FY87
estimate and the FY88 budget. The large increase in FY87 results because the budget includes the
—
police and fire retirement contributions for the first time. These contributions amount to $642,801
in FY87 and $675,817 in FY88. Excluding the contributions, the FY87 personal services would increase
only 6.5% over the FY86 amount.
_
2. Commodities
—
The previous chart indicates that commodity costs show a dramatic increase in FY87. This is due to
exceptionally low expenditures in FY86 vastly for fuel under Patrol and for surfacing materials under
Streets System Maintenance. Commodities mainly consist of office and cleaning supplies, and mainte-
nance and repair materials for buildings, streets and equipment. Generally, supplies and materials
_
are projected at a 1.4% increase over FY87.
3. Services and Charges
_
Services and Charges cover expenses for insurance premiums, payments for Aid to Agencies, printing,
various service contracts, gas, electricity and telephone. There is a decrease from FY86 to FY87, due
mainly to insurance and vehicle maintenance costs: insurance costs went down in the General Fund
I
because the coverage was reduced and resulted in about $50,000 less in premiums plus the insurance
costs for Transit, $117,226 are being paid under the Transit fund beginning in FY87; then, vehicle
maintenance charges "were very high in FY86, approximately $70,000 more than FY87 budgets. Overall,
the budget for services and charges rises 1.3% in FY88. In past years, the Aid to Agencies has been
a�
funded from Federal Revenue Sharing monies. With the discontinuance of that program, the agencies'
p
payments have been reduced from the FY87 level of $193,299 to $118,415 in the FYBB proposed budget.
$68,415 will be funded from Community Development Block Grant monies with the remainder caning from
,
the General Fund. Without the reduction in Aid to Agencies payments, services and charges would have
increased 4%.
4. Capital Outlay
,
In FY88, expenditures for capital items will increase. Ninety percent of the capital outlay will be
for five departments: Police ($134,063 for patrol cars and general equipment needs), Fire ($497,710
for general equipment needs, including $451,517 for a new ladder truck), Streets ($260,000 total of
11
�r
IJ
IJ
IJ
and which $250,000
2 50,0001piis for the sparks resurfacing
esuand favi tion gram), Library ($181,450 mostly for library materials
needs). ($90,470 for Cemetery, Recreation and Parks capital
5. Transfers
This includes the General Fund subsidies for Transit operations ($320,000), Airport ($103,113) and
JCCOG ($71,064). It also includes a transfer to Transit in the amount of the transit property tax
levy ($511,793) State law mandates that property taxes received from the transit levy be receipted
into the General Fund and then transferred to transit operations.
The increase in transfers, in FY88, is due primarily to the transfer of funds from the Recreation
Facility Reserve and the Parkland Acquisition Reserve to Recreation and Parks for various capital
replacement and repair projects. This totals $148,500 and is detailed below.
From Recreation Facilities Reserve
To:
Recreation
Capital Improvements Project
From Parkland Acquisition Reserve
To:
Parks
Capital Improvements Project
For:
Remodel Rec. Center Pool $27,000
Paint Ceiling in Gymnasium 16,500
Repair Rec. Center Roof 15,000
TOTAL 150,500
For:
Playground equipment $10,000
Picnic tables 3,000
Barbecue grills 2,500
Electricity to City Park shelters 5,000
Water to City Park shelters 1,500
Plumbing to Hickory Hill restroom 3,000
City Park Tennis Courts 49,000
Mercer Park Softball fields 16 000
TOTAL �, - ---
-=3yviuuu
12
The Pure Fund balance decreases in FY87. This is due to the establishment of theannual contingency
amount of approximately $300,000. In FY88, the Pure Fund balance decreases by $280,000. This results
because total expenditures exceed total receipts. The deterioration of the City's working capital
position will need to be monitored closely. Any unused contingency amount in each year will be added to
the Pure Fund balance to improve the working capital position. Unless experience shows that the annual
contingency amount can be reduced, it will be necessary in future years to increase receipts and/or
decrease expenditures in order to maintain and increase the Pure Fund balance, (Following the Budget
Overview are schedules summarizing the reserve balances.)
The Pure Fund balance is used to provide for cash flow in the first quarter of the new fiscal year due to
the fact that property taxes are not received until October. The following chart shows cash flow needs or
how expenditures have exceeded receipts in the first quarter of recent years.
13
4
8
Q
D.
Pui
G•
D. GENERAL FUND YEAR-END BALANCE
j
During the Council's discussion
contingency were discussed. The Pure
session in October 1986, the concept of the Pure Fund balance and a
Fund balance
is that portion of the balance maintained as working
capital which is not available for allocation except in emergency situations. The contingency is that
portion available for allocation
FY87 Estimated Budget FY88
to unbudgeted and
unplanned expenditures during the fiscal year. The
and Proposed Budget both include the contingency portion in the expenditures.
In addition, the salary and benefits budget in
turnover. The increased salaries
each
amount and the
year is carried at 100% with no reduction for
contingency together total approximately 2% of the
expenditures budget which should
will occur during the fiscal
be sufficient to
cover the unplanned and unbudgeted expenditure which
year,
The annual year-end fund balance
Fund's working capital position.
minus the reserve balances gives the Pure Fund balance or the General
The following the
1987 and 1988.
chart
gives Pure Fund balance for fiscal years 1986,
FY86
FY87 FY88
Actual
Estimate Budget
Beginning Fund Balance
= 1,988,937
$ 1,514,804 = 1,701,568
Receipts
Expenditures
13,492,355
15,183,579 16,061,697
(13,966,488)
(14,996,815) (16,303,825)
Ending Fund Balance
$ 1,514,804
$ 1,701,568 $ 1,465,440
Less Reserve Balances
(464,989)
(740,752) (801,867)
Pure Fund Balance
$-11049_815
$ $___6631573
--960,816
The Pure Fund balance decreases in FY87. This is due to the establishment of theannual contingency
amount of approximately $300,000. In FY88, the Pure Fund balance decreases by $280,000. This results
because total expenditures exceed total receipts. The deterioration of the City's working capital
position will need to be monitored closely. Any unused contingency amount in each year will be added to
the Pure Fund balance to improve the working capital position. Unless experience shows that the annual
contingency amount can be reduced, it will be necessary in future years to increase receipts and/or
decrease expenditures in order to maintain and increase the Pure Fund balance, (Following the Budget
Overview are schedules summarizing the reserve balances.)
The Pure Fund balance is used to provide for cash flow in the first quarter of the new fiscal year due to
the fact that property taxes are not received until October. The following chart shows cash flow needs or
how expenditures have exceeded receipts in the first quarter of recent years.
13
4
8
Q
D.
Pui
N.,
J
�J
I
1
July/September
Fiscal Year
Receipts
FY87
$1,821,136
FY86
$2,098,601
FY85
$1,814,963
FY84
$1,203,122
FY83
$1,354,860
FY82
$ 964,788
July/September
Shortfall
Expenditures
in Receipts
$3,835,878
($2,014,742)
$4,092,650
($1,994,049)
$3,722,020
($1,907,057)
$3,123,522
($1,920,400)
$2,694,988
($1,340,128)
$2,402,406
($1,437,618)
The projected year end balance will provide for the majority of the shortfall. The remainder is funded
internally by balances in other funds until property taxes are received in October. It is becoming
increasingly difficult each year to fund the shortfall internally as other available fund balances
continue to decrease.
E. DEBT SERVICE FUND
This fund provides for the payment of the principal and interest on general obligations of the City.
Funding is provided by the Debt Service Tax Levy and abatement from various Enterprise funds for their
capital improvements which were funded by General Obligation Bonds. $11,050,000 of bonds sold in 1985 and
1986 provide funding for capital improvements projects now in progress or completed. This includes
$3,725,000 for the swimming pool project which was approved by voter referendum in June 1986. Debt service
costs for FY88 also includes a $1,300,000 bond issue to fund capital projects which will be in progress in
FY88.
As stated in the Fiscal Policy (Capital Improvements Program FY88-92), "Debt incurred as a general
obligation of the City of Iowa City shall not exceed statutory limits: presently 5% of the market value of
the taxable property within the corporate limits as established by the City Assessor."
This schedule shows the relation of Iowa City's allowable debt margin and the debt incurred for FY84
through FY88:
Allowable Debt
Margin (5% of
Total Property Val.)
$61,989,085
$62,406,186
$58,746,358
$56,232,786
$48,046,089
14
Debt at
Total
July 1
Property
$17,950,000
Valuation
FY88
$1,239,781,694
FY87
$1,248,123,717
FY86
$1,174,927,158
FY85
$1,124,655,722
vvaa
t n6n.921_776
Allowable Debt
Margin (5% of
Total Property Val.)
$61,989,085
$62,406,186
$58,746,358
$56,232,786
$48,046,089
14
Debt at
Debt as % of
July 1
Allowable Debt Margin
$17,950,000
29%
$13,625,000
22%
$10,500,000
18%
$12,100,000
22%
$13,400,000
28%
9)'
ice the taxlevy
thegeneral
se° nTheharges payableing ffrom
The fiscal policy also includes the vice
thit "deal bt
,guideline
shall not exceed 25% of that levy Y
total levy for FY84 through FY88:
levy as a percentage of the
w
Debt Debt Service
t�
Total Service of Total
L� Levy
FY88 11.549 2.536
FY87 10.609 1.892 18%
18%
FY86 10.885 1.952
FY85 10.652 1.830 17%
-
FY84 11.908 1.848 16%
7-
F. TRUST AND AGENCY FUND
for the payment of pension and employee benefits. Funding is provided by the Trust and
-
This fund provides Agencyin FYBB wusae
dihtioninsurance
levy. costs vd
pension contributions, Fire Systanualexpenses,wo
eotThe City will contribute 17.519% of all sworn police
claims.
premiums and unemployment compensation—
firefighters' salaries to the respective pension/retirement
officers' salaries and 30.724% all
systems.
G. OTHER FUNDS
�s and equipment and rents
for cle
a1Fu
dingvisnprovided from the chargebackvforcthe
TEquiment Maintenance Fund vides avehicle cpool.e
aoc
to therpCity departments from central
and the rentals of vehicles.
maintenance services
County Council of Goverments), CDBG (Community Develop-
The Special Revenue Funds include JCCOG (Johnson
Federal Revenue Sharing. The JCCOG fund is an agency fund as the City
TheSpecial
BlockGrantn Road Use Tax and
for the fund and provides accounting services for JCCOG.
rl
F
only acts as custodian
The COBG Fund accounts for revenue from U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Community
protects as defined by Federal
F1�
Development Block Grant programs and is restricted in use for eligible
from the State which is restricted to be used for
regulations. The Road Use Tax Fund accounts for revenue
traffic engineering and street construction costs.
only street maintenance,
Sharing since it has an unallocated fund
The FYBB Proposed Budget includes a budget for Federal Revenue uck for the
be laddere a new
lincl rProgram
$451,517. was
of FY87ofReven a Sharing
balance at thethis fund asl then Federal
revenuesThis
Fire Department
discontinued in FY87.
15
A
3
`7
j 1. Operating Funds
4 i
` .. Parking, sewer and water revenues fund operations and also pay the principal and interest due on their
respective revenue bond issues. In FY88, $382,420 of sewer revenue, $174,035 of water revenue, and
$33,000 of airport revenue will also be used to pay general obligation bond issues which were sold to
finance sewer, water and airport projects.
zoo 16
ENTERPRISE FUNDS
The Enterprise Funds include Parking, Pollution Control, Water, Refuse, Landfill, Airport and Transit. These
are utilities or services supported primarily from revenues for services provided.
A. Enterprise Fund Revenues
Refuse collection rates were last increased on July 1, 1985. A rate increase is scheduled for July 1,
subsidy from
--
1987, from $4.30 to $4.50 per month. Refuse Collection is self-supporting and receives no
the General Fund.
i
I
Transit fares were last increased July 1, 1985, to 501 and will remain at that level in FY88. The monthly
total
bus pass will be increased from $16 to $18. Fare revenue is estimated to provide 39%($725,000 of
361 $1,000 assessed valuation for operations plus
revenue in FY88. The transit tax levy is set at per
$129,000 for insurance costs (total levy is 48.11 per $1,000) and will generate $511,793 or 28% of total
taxes for 17% of
revenue will come from the General Fund subsidy from property
revenues. The remaining
from federal and state operating assistance for 14% ($266,178).
revenues ($320,00D) and
_
I
J
Parking rates last increased February 1986. No rate increases are proposed in FY88. Parking revenue
off-street meters, permit lots
includes $1,129,830 from the parking ramps and $512,908 from on -street and
total of $1,642,738 in operating revenue. Parking fines of $192,000 are
and building rentals for a
receipted in the Parking fund to satisfy revenue requirements for Parking Revenue bonds. If the balance
at year-end is adequate, those fines will be transferred to the General Fund.
Landfill fees are proposed to increase July 1, 1987, from $7.75 per ton to $8.00 per ton. Fees were last
increased April 1986, as a result of a state mandate that requires 251 per ton to be paid into a state
ton). The last rate increase that provided
fund for cleaning up landfills (from $7.50 to $7.75 per
for operations occurred, in July 1983, when the rate increased from $6.75 to $7.50.
additional revenue
-
Airport operations are funded primarily from the operating subsidy from the General Fund (51% of total
revenues) and from building rentals (36% of total revenues).
Water rates and Pollution Control rates are both scheduled to increase in September 1987, as the second
step in a three year rate increase schedule.
j
B. Enterprise Fund Expenditures
`7
j 1. Operating Funds
4 i
` .. Parking, sewer and water revenues fund operations and also pay the principal and interest due on their
respective revenue bond issues. In FY88, $382,420 of sewer revenue, $174,035 of water revenue, and
$33,000 of airport revenue will also be used to pay general obligation bond issues which were sold to
finance sewer, water and airport projects.
zoo 16
r
Enterprise Fund expenditure comparisons follow:
FY86 FY87 % FY88
Act Estimate Change Bud tChan e
Parking Operations 1,905,490 2,172,392 14.0 1,925,874
Pollution Control Operations 1,685,512 3,425,541 103.2 4,378,564 (11.3)
Water Operations 1,927,130 2,074,940 27.8
Refuse Collection Operations 564,657 569,892 0.9 2,120,110 2.2
Landfill Operations 620,347 8,9
j. Airport Operations 763,071 419,349 (45.0) 505,661 20.6
Transit Operations185,264 192,992 4.2 202,186
2,181,254 2,029,166 4.8
(7.0) 1,853,421 (8,7)
Parking Operations has $100,000 budgeted to pay for Capitol Street Ramp deck renovations in FY87.
Pollution Control expenditures increase in FY87 and again in FY88 as a result of debt service payments
required by the 1986 Sewer Revenue Bond Issue of $38,950,000. Total Debt Services transfers amount to
$2,345,690 in FY87 and to $3,264,050 in FY88. Without these transfers, expenditures would have
decreased in FY87 by 3% and increased in FY88 by 3.2%.
The expenditures for Water show normal increases with capital outlay being at a slightly higher level
I in FY87 as compared to FY86 and FY88.
i Refuse expenditures reflect only inflationary increases, but no changes in service.
t Landfill costs vary according to capital outlay and transfers. FY86 includes transfers and expendi-
tures of approximately $100,000 for the Landfill Leachate Control project and $189,000 for contracted
excavation at the Landfill site. FY88 has no capital projects or excavation planned.
A
Airport expenditures reflect only inflationary increases.
1,I
Transit expenditures decrease in both FY87 and FY88 due to proposed reductions to balance with
available funding sources. The Transit System was funded by parking revenues in both FY86 and FY87,
but those revenues have been depleted.
`! 2. Reserve Funds
,d
The revenue bond ordinances require that Parking, Pollution Control and Water set aside these special
accounts:
:I
17
-I
M
r,�w
18
V!i
a) Bond and Interest Sinking Reserves - amounts sufficient to
ties.
-.
pay current
b) Bond and Interest Reserves - balances
bond and interest maturi-
to be maintained that are equal
principle and interest due on the bonds in any succeeding fiscal
c) Depreciation, Extension
to the maximum amount of
! —
year.
and Improvement Reserve or Renewal and Improvement Reserves
annually for Pollution Control
transferred 000 lfund
—
in from each respective�operations
er and �0of
meats. rfor atthe
annually
kmP o0e�
Purpose
d) Operations Reserve - only pollution
funding
i
1
control bonds are required to carry
balance of $3,672,550. Bonds called early may be paid from this
this reserve; it needs a
reserve.
Landfill, Airport, and Transit have
separate reserves for future capital
reserve is provided for purchase of additional landfill land or Construction
deemed a necessary alternative
expenditures. Landfill's
of a facility that may b
to a landfill site. Airport reserves are intende
ats to runways and facilities. The transit for Improve
std
state grants. reserve will he used to repay
-
capital improve-
loans from federal
J
and
i
18
V!i
CITY OF IOWA CITY
FY88 OPERATING BUDGET
GENERAL FUND RESERVES
SUMMARY OF YEAR-END BALANCES
ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROPOSED
FY86 FY87 FY88
Broadband Telecommunications -
Operations
$ 11,088
$ (7,798)
$ (221)
Equipment Replacement
20,087
13,877
13,877
Library -
Public Access Equip. Replacement
--
13,710
17,250
AV Equipment Replacement
5,077
8,577
12,077
Recreation Facilities Reserve
52,972
84,553
26,053
Parkland Acquisition Reserve
341,765
372,819
297,679
Risk Management
--
221,014
401,152
Escrows 6 Deposits
34,000
34,000
34,000
TOTAL
$ 464,989
$ 740,752
$ 801,867
19
06-30-86 BALANCE
RECEIPTS:
Franchise Fee
Transfer -In
Miscellaneous
EXPENDITURES:
Operations
Transfer -Out
06-30-87 BALANCE
RECEIPTS:
Franchise Fee
Transfer -In
Miscellaneous
EXPENDITURES:
Operations
Transfer -Out
06-30-88 BALANCE
L_
$ 11,088
83,442
1D0
(76,014)
(26,414)
$ (7,798)
96,298
100
$ 20,087
7,500
(13,710)
$ 13,877
$ 13,877
20
13,710
$ 13,710
3,540
$ 5,077
3,500
$ 8,577
3,500
W
CITY OF IOWA CITY
FY88 OPERATING BUDGET
GENERAL FUND RESERVES
6
.
-BROADBAND TELECOMMUNICATIONS
p
-LIBRARY
LIBRARY
s� I
BBT
BBT EQUIPMENT
PUBLIC ACCESS LIBRARY -AV
t j
OPERATTr)NQ ..., __..___
EQUIPMENT Pnr IT Dal T,a,
rn i
06-30-86 BALANCE
RECEIPTS:
Franchise Fee
Transfer -In
Miscellaneous
EXPENDITURES:
Operations
Transfer -Out
06-30-87 BALANCE
RECEIPTS:
Franchise Fee
Transfer -In
Miscellaneous
EXPENDITURES:
Operations
Transfer -Out
06-30-88 BALANCE
L_
$ 11,088
83,442
1D0
(76,014)
(26,414)
$ (7,798)
96,298
100
$ 20,087
7,500
(13,710)
$ 13,877
$ 13,877
20
13,710
$ 13,710
3,540
$ 5,077
3,500
$ 8,577
3,500
W
CITY OF IOWA CITY
FY88 OPERATING BUDGET
GENERAL FUND RESERVES
-RECREATION FACILITIES
-PARKLAND ACQUISITION
21
RECREATION
FACILITIES
$ 52,972
31,581
$ 84,553
(58,500)
$ 26,053
PARKLAND
ACQUISITION
$ 341,765
21,054
10,000
$ 372,819
14,860
(90,000)
$ 297,679
01
06-30-86 BALANCE
RECEIPTS:
Hotel -Motel Tax
Transfer -In
EXPENDITURES:
j�
Transfer -Out
"
06-30-87 BALANCE
RECEIPTS:
Hotel -Motel Tax
Transfer -In
EXPENDITURES:
-
Transfer -Out
06-30-88 BALANCE
J
@@ J
21
RECREATION
FACILITIES
$ 52,972
31,581
$ 84,553
(58,500)
$ 26,053
PARKLAND
ACQUISITION
$ 341,765
21,054
10,000
$ 372,819
14,860
(90,000)
$ 297,679
01
CITY OF IOWA CITY
FY88 OPERATING BUDGET
GENERAL FUND RESERVES
-RISK MANAGEMENT
06-30-86 BALANCE $ --
RECEIPTS:
Property Tax 882,438
EXPENDITURES:
Insurance Premiums (499,198)
Damages & Claims (45,000)
Transfer -Out (117,226)
06-30-87 BALANCE $ 221,014
RECEIPTS:
Property Tax 753,438
EXPENDITURES:
Insurance Premiums (528,300)
Damages & Claims (45,000)
06-30-88 BALANCE $ 401,152
ANALYSIS: This assumes that umbrella insurance is not purchased
in FY88. If it is available at a reasonable cost, the expenditure
for premiums will increase resulting In a comparable decrease in
the year-end balance. Without umbrella insurance, the City has
coverage of $1 million; in past years the City has carried $11
million in coverage. The fund balance will be reserved to pay
any uninsured claims or judgements.
22
CITY OF IOWA CITY
FY88 GENERAL FUND TING ET
BEGINNING BALANCE
TOTAL BALANCE
TOTAL RECEIPTS
PERSONAL SERVICES
COMMODITIES
SERVICES AND CHARGES
CAPITAL OUTLAY
TRANSFERS
CONTINGENCY
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
ENDING BALANCE
FY86
ACTUAL
11988_937
--119881937
7,530,488
FY87
ESTIMATE
FY88
PROPOSED
1_514_804
--1_514,804
1_701,568
---------
-_ --_ 568
1_701:568
--- __— ---
8,484,356
8,404,987
511,793
380,077
28,816
28,416
13180C
86;Soo 738
150',761
151,970
80,281
306,VU4
1,633,365
1,862,100
0
0
642,661
34,
34,518
203,663
1721448
135_556
13,500
18_441
----
15_183_579
13,492,355
—9_593,480
—8,400,849
610,648
—512,020
—3,181,134
-2:933,045
666,092
831,090
-994,395
—1,041,3950
_199_155
—14_996,815
—13_966,488---
_-- —
115_14_804
1,701,568
=��_
23
111,--
162,01
37,1
376,7
1710
418,3
18,0
292,2
622,]
46,;
250;1
337,1
210,'
100,
96,
451,
2,0101
68,
72,000
24,841
16_067,697
—10,117,763
—619,006
—2,970,342
-11295,268
—1,181,446
—120_000
_16_303_825
1,465,440
rs_ =
M
FY88YPROPOSED BUDGET
EXPENDITURES SUMMARY
GENERAL FUND
ACTIVITY FY86
-------- ACTUAL
GRAND TOTAL
FY87 FY88
ESTIMATE BUDGET
tee, 1 /3
139,934
304,129
112,808
1324
140 033
r
200,437
40,000
214,2
71,5
193,381
S 133,909
2201082
102,428
190,4
18818
112,780
166,979
168,049
17910
CES 2001801
r
260,716
203,353
271,7
194,9
276,419
127,950
297,951
126,733
308 6'.
13116,
226,831
9,236
148,951
120,1!
709,491
152,748
0
661,424
1351679
573 31
17236 161
31,990
:ON 976,232
1,0131710
1
1,291,8'
4,765
167,591
175,389
232,932
3841106
145,53
387 49
80,807
57,260
62,350
81181
16,084
1591263
16 593
,
17,75
1,524,882
176,792
1,757,240
250,339
1,939,08
249,52
ER 229,924 968
2291575
292 15
r
1,552,747
119,283
1,974,097
1301907
2,539,45
144 38
61,178
163,061
174,237
183175
108,771
10,346
118,255
p
123148.
619,078
1,275,812
644,715
1,314,299
627,09,
1,398,24:
119,918
119,798
132,538
128,998
124,461
141172;
786,361
414,995
784,053
448,887
909179,
483155;
1,203,602
51,492
1,263,649
81,734
1,313,89'.
89,09E
205,353
22 909
222,227
7
1
258500
4,606
106 3
__: _81
p
_ _ _ 0
1
0
90 _007
13_966,488
_ _
14,996,815 16,303,825
GORERAI, FUND
DEBT SERVICE
PARSING OPEMTIONS
PARENG, RESERVES
POLYGYION CONTROL OPERATIONS
POLL OovML, RE8E31VE3
NATER CPERATIONB
NATER,RESENSS
REFUSE CDLIECTION OPERATIONS
WIDFILL OPERATIONS
LANDFILL RESERVES
AIRPORT OPERATIONS
AIRPORT RESERVES
TRANSIT OPERATIONS
TRANSIT RESERVES
TRUST A AGENCY, PENS 6 RETIRE
SCCOG
ROAD USE TAX
FEDERAL REVVM SNARING
CDBG, NETRO ENTITLEIffiNT
GRAND TOTAL
CITY OP IOWA CITY
P288 OPERATING BUDGET
FINANCIAL SUNNARY - P107
--------
-------------------------------------------
DISBURSE- TRWRSFERS TOTAL DIS- BALANCE
017634 TRAx6P6R8 S 6-70-67
OUT B-------------------
BAIANCE PROPERTY
6 -Jo -86 TAX RECEIRTB
RECEIPTS
IN __ _ _ _________
KOM �______________�_
3,{03.807 2.950,092
15,18),579 14,003,420
994,395 14,996,815
1,701,568
1x511,804 8,827.680
3,229,731
0
7,279,721
57,647
420,740 2,007,195
51,060
812,829 2,867,024
947,878 1,224,554
3,172,792
13,049
709,664
0 1,669,777
6,000 1,B75r777
0
552,5)8
1,159,813
985,996
0 0
736,73{ 726,734
553,5J8
1,776,121
7,425.541
708,700
387.397
0 ],150,446
0 ].150,44/
1.049,120
906, 677
2,368,919
9,470, 170
1,160,677
0 5.500. 987 5,077,47]
10.578,416
1.761.217
190,554
2,074,940
75,096
77,577
0 2,077,461
0 1,073,461
1, 666,786
96,777
196,141
648 866
,
656,589
p 36,745
132,777 188,71/
100,066
0
569,893
57,704
40,]97
p 587,30]
0 567,203
569.893
15,000
{19.749
7170
476 ,
315,190
0 680,677
p 680,871
391,749
p
281,919
212,627
p 17,092
25,000 76,091
6
3],000
192,992
3,650
2
0 97r 197
100,670 197,827
159,992
- 0
1061 149
rB15
96,885
p 7,264
0 7,261
0
0
p
2,029,166
4,077
p
0 1,034,000
999,207 2,07],201
7,039,166
0
95,041
86,141
0 6,900
0 6,900
C
86,500
6
6/2x801
729,701
-57,060
1)6.779
478,917 96.565
0 575.503
p
156,048
66,156
65,486
0 97,712
79,006 176,716
156,018
1,562,168
1,861,168
745,683
704,817
o l,eo7,o7a
o 1,em,a74
0
197,299
197,999
451,517
424,399
p 771,117
0 271,117
700
2) 869
1,076,05{
C
0 1,040.155
0 1,040, 155
1,007,185
r
-11,101
__ _ _ _ _
10,908,9] 13,966x664
27r5�:r��5
------
8,566,811
----------
36,096,276
_______•-_
5 06,875
7316,467
11,769,792 71,787,52
25
FUND
GENERAL FUND
-DEBT SERVICE
PARQNO OPERATIONS
PARKING, REBERV68
POLIMION. CONTROL OPERATIONS
POLL CONTROL, RESERVES
NATER OPERATIONS
NATER,RlSZEV 8
REFUSE COLLECTION OPERATIONS
LANDFILL OPERATIONS
..LANDFILL RESERVES
AIRPORT OPERATIONS
...AIRPORT RESERVES
TRANSIT OPERATIONS
TRANSIT RESERVES
TRUST 6 AGENCY, PENS A RETIRE
JCC00
ROAD US2 TAX
FEDERAL REVENUE SHARING
CDBG, HEM ENTITLMmNT
GRAND TOTAL
CITY OF
IOWA CITY
.-
FY88 OPERATING BUDGET
FINANCIAL SUMMARY - FY88
_
"'-----------"------"'-------"'-------------
6-30X87
6-00-87
PROPERTY
TAE
OTKRECEIPTS
-EC6IPT8
TRANSFERS
TOTAL
OISBORS6- TRAOUT6R8 TOTAL DIS-
6630-88
.__________________________
IN
AECEIPIB
@FS
OUT
BURe[NEIITB
6 -70 -BB
ri 1
1,701,568
9,078,765
7,522,076
7,507,298
16,067,697
15,122,179
1,181,666
16,707,825
1,665,660
�•'�
57,667
2,700,618
11,928
825,211
7,577,757
7,595,600
0
7,595,600
- 0
1
17,069
0
1,906,825
6,000
1,912,825
1,029,076
896,800
1,925,87/
0
i
f
1,159,812
0
0
686,800
686,800
625,870
0
625,878
1,218,771
708,200
0
6,822,093
0
6,822,087
1,116,516
7,266,050
6,778,366
731,719
!
9,670,170
0
152,696
7,767,160
7,515,856
7,127,160
681,570
7,606,690
9,781,296
75,098
0
2,265,708
0
2,265,708
1,910,075
210,075
2,120,110
22D,696
-
668,866
0
68,068
276,580
282,668
198,580
198,580
797,160
576,736
57,706
0
616,260
0
616,260
620,767
0
620,767
51,597
_
676,717
0
702,972
0
702,972
680,661
25,000
505,661
676,026
282,919
0
11,092
25,000
78,092
0
0
0
721,011
7,680
0
95,627
107,117
198,576
169,186
71,000
202,186
0
106,169
0
7,266
0
7,266
0
0
0
117,617
6,077
0
1,019,178
871,791
1,850,971
1,857,621
0
1,857,621
1,587
95,061
0
6,900
0
6,900
0
0
0
101,961
I
-57,060
757,208
102 765N
0
059,977
97,500
696,690
796,190
8,727
r
86,156
0
69,710
86,166
155,876
156,727
0
72] 156
,
85,309
t
265,683
0
1,790,607
0
1,790,607
0 2,036,090
2,076,090
0
�
.y
651,517
0
0
0
0
0
651,517
651,517
0
0
----------
0
773,000
0
777,000
717,698
15,102
777,000
0
__ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _i
5,186,673 12,696,19.1 17,886,291 9,667,1111 60,0.67,607 30,816,756 9,689,060 60,706,596 16,929,882
.o... .. ... .� �. .�.. e ....... ......� .............................
26
G3°'
..J
CITY OF IOWA CITY M
IMPACT OF INFLATION ON THE BUDGET v
"We -on
-
23
22
A
20
N
g
le
�!
16
P la
13
u
12
11
10
Pi
9
a
i�
7
�I
a
a
4
78 79 80
81 62 83 84 86 88 87 68
FISCAL TEARS
27
CITY OF IOWA CITY
FY88 OPERATING BUDGET
SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES
*ME TIE Mowy Goo
ALL FUNDS BY FUND
28
WNW TIE Mow GOES
GENERAL FUND DEPT. /DIVISION
- CITY OF IOWA CITY
i FY88 OPERATING BUDGET
�-- SUMMARY OF RECEIPTS 6 EXPENDITURES
I !
GENERAL FUND
I
WHERE THE MONEY COKES FROM
J
3TAT[ FUNDING
„
J
. FIM"
• Fm
J
FMGFFMT7 TAT
121
IMTIM"T IMCGYF
11
J
29
AlI
WHERE THE MONEY GOES
al
s-�
CITY OF IOWA CITY
FY88 OPERATING BUDGET
SUMMARY OF RECEIPTS & EXPENDITURES
ALL FUNDS
WHM TW MOWY COMES F"
..i
30
WH RE THE MOWY GOES
4
r
CITY OF IOWA CITY
FY88 OPERATING BUDGET
AUTHORIZED PERSONNEL LISTING
FULL-TIME EQUIVALENTS
------ FY87 ------- -------FY88 ------
FULL PART FULL PART
TIME TIME TOTAL TIME TIME TOTAL
.00 7.00
.25 3.25
.00 4.00
.00 1.00
.00 3.00
.00 3.00
.75 1.75
1.62 32.72
.00 .00
.00 2.00
.00 1.00
.00 .00
.00 6.25
.00 10.00
.00 2.00
.00 1.00
.50 .50
.50 63.50
.00 51.00
.00 4.00
.00 11.00
.00 8.00
.00 18.50
.00 2.00
31
7.00
CITY COUNCIL
7.00
3.00
CITY CLERK
3.00
J
CITY ATTORNEY
4.00
1.00
.00
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
1.00
.00
3.00
CITY MANAGER
3.00
3.00
HUMAN RELATIONS
3.00
1.75
BROADBAND TELECOMMUNICATIONS
1.00
_
FINANCE
31.10
.00
2.00
RISK MANAGEMENT
.00
1.00
.00
1.00
.00
.00
GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS
2.00
.00
CIVIL RIGHTS
1.00
J
NON -OPERATIONAL ADMINISTRATIO
.00
.00
2.00
PLANNING & PROGRAM DEVEL40PHEN
6.25
1.00
.00
ENGINEERING
10.00
63.00
PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION
2.00
1
C.B.D. MAINTENANCE
1.00
4.00
ENERGY CONSERVATION
.00
11.00
POLICE
63.00
8.00
FIRE DEPARTMENT
51.00
"
ANIMAL CONTROL
4.00
2.00
HOUSING & INSPECTION SERVICES
11.00
,n
[U'
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
8.00
STREET SYSTEM MAINTENANCE
18.50
FORESTRY/HORTICULTURE
2.00
.00 7.00
.25 3.25
.00 4.00
.00 1.00
.00 3.00
.00 3.00
.75 1.75
1.62 32.72
.00 .00
.00 2.00
.00 1.00
.00 .00
.00 6.25
.00 10.00
.00 2.00
.00 1.00
.50 .50
.50 63.50
.00 51.00
.00 4.00
.00 11.00
.00 8.00
.00 18.50
.00 2.00
31
7.00
.00
7.00
3.00
.25
3.25
4.00
.00
4.00
1.00
.00
1.00
3.00
.00
3.00
3.00
.00
3.00
1.00
.75
1.75
31.10
1.62
32.72
.00
.00
.00
2.00
.00
2.00
1.00
.00
1.00
.00
.00
.00
6.25
.00
6.25
10.00
.00
10.00
2.00
.00
2.00
1.00
.00
1.00
.00
.50
.50
63.00
.50
63.50
51.00
.00
51.00
4.00
.00
4.00
11.00
.00
11.00
8.00
.00
8.00
18.50
.00
18.50
2.00
.00
2.00
CEMETERY
PARES 6 RECREATION
LIBRARY
SENIOR CENTER
** TOTAL GENERAL FUND
PARKING OPERATIONS
POLLUTION CONTROL OPERATIONS
WATER OPERATIONS
REFUSE COLLECTION OPERATIONS
LANDFILL OPERATIONS
AIRPORT OPERATIONS
TRANSIT OPERATIONS
** TOTAL ENTERPRISE FUNDS
JCCOG
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
CENTRAL SUPPLY i PRINT
ASSISTED HOUSING
CDBG, RENTAL REHAB.
CDBG, METRO ENTITLEMENT
** TOTAL OTHER FUNDS
**** GRAND TOTAL
CITY OF IOWA CITY
AUTHORIZEDPPERSONNELULISTING
FULL-TIME EQUIVALENTS
------ FY87 ------- FY88 ------
FULL PART FULL PART
TIME TIME TOTAL TIME TIME TOTAL
'--- ---- ----- ---- ---- -----
3.00
.00
3.00
22.00
.00
22.00
21.00
5.75
26.75
4.00
.50
4.50
282.85
9.87
292.72
17.00
8.50
25.50
17.00
.00
17.00
22.00
.00
22.00
10.75
.00
10.75
6.75
.00
6.75
1.00
.00
1.00
29.00
20.50
49.50
103.50
29.00
132.50
3.80
.00
3.80
18.00
.00
18.00
.90
.00
.90
7.00
.00
7.00
.00
.00
.00
3.95
.00
3.95
33.65
.00
33.65
420.00 38.87 458.87
32
3.00
.00
3.00
22.00
.00
22.00
21.00
5.75
26.75
4.00
.50
4.50
282.85
9.87
292.72
17.00
8.50
25.50
17.00
.00
17.00
22.00
.00
22.00
10.75
.00
10.75
6.75
.00
6.75
1.00
.00
1.00
20.00
20.50
40.50
94.50
29.00
123.50
3.80
.00
3.80
18.00
.00
18.00
.90
.00
.90
7.00
.00
7.00
.00
.00
.00
3.95
.00
3.95
33.65
.00
33.65
411.00
38.87 449.87
43
J
La
TRANSFER TO
BUDGETED FUNDS
GENERAL FUND:
Nan -o a ti
CITY OF IOWA CITY
FY88 OPERATING BUDGET
RECEIPTS - TRANSFERS ]N*
TRANSFER
AMOUNT
i
p ra onal Admin.
CDBG
Parking Operations
68.398
212,000,
Police Administration
Police Patrol
Trust 6 Agency
Police Criminal Investigation
Trust b Agency
Trust d Agency
16,214
227,074
Fire Department -
Trust d Agency
30,777
General Revenue Sharing
752
451517
'
Traffic Engineering
Road Use Tax
Streets
621,986
Road Use Tax
1,388,104
Cemetery
Perpetual Care Trust
Recreation
15,162
Recreation Facilities Reserve
43,500
Parks
Parkland Acquisition Reserve
25,000
Library
Library Equip, Replacement Reserve
Cable TV Support
Library
13,936
Library Public Access
Cable 7V Support
3,500
DEBT SERVICE
3.540
Airport Operations
Pollution Control Reserves
33,000
Water Operations
82,42
1 74,030
174.035
Special Assessments
Capital Projects150,000
85,756
PARKING OPERATIONS
PARKTMP
General Fund, Senior Center
3,522,460
825,211
RESERVE 6,000
Parking Systems Operations
33 684,800
�4ORnbR
nt v _
n
N��
34
TRANSFER TO
lam,,
TRANSFER FROM
AMOUNT
POLLUTION CONTROL RESERVE
Pollution Control Operations
3,262,550
Pollution Control Reserves
10061
3,363,160
WATER RESERVES
Water Operations
Water Reserve
36,000
198,580
234,580
LANDFILL RESERVES
Landfill Operations
AIRPORT OPERATIONS
General Fund Non-op. Admin.
25,000
TRANSIT OPERATIONS
General Fund Non-op. Admin.
103,113
Transit Levy from General Fund
320,000
511.793
831,793
JCCOG
General Fund Administration
71,064
CDBG
15,102
86,166
9,682,283
*Description of transfers appear on
the following chart: Disbursements-Transfers Out.
34
■
TRANSFER FROM
CITY OF IOWA CITY
FY88 OPERATING BUDGET
DISBURSEMENTS - TRANSFERS OUT
TRANSFER TO
BUDGETED FUNDS
GENERAL FUND:
I Nan -operational Admin. JCCOG.t 0ations
I
Transa per
Transit Operations
Airport Operations
Broadband Telecommunications General Fund, Library
Library Access
Library Equip. Replacement Reserve
Senior Center Parking Operations
Recreation Facilities Reserve Recreation
Recreation
Capital Improvements Project
Parkland Acquisition Reserve Parks
PARKING SYSTEMS:
Operations
Capital Improvements Project
General Fund Administration
General Fund Administration
Renewal & Improvement Reserve
Bond & Interest Sinking
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
Iowa City's Portion 71,064
Operating Subsidy 320,000
Transit Levy 511,793
Operating Subsidy 103,113
Cable TV Support 13,936
Reserve for Future Replacement 3,540
Reserve for Future Replacement
Reserve Parking for Senior Center
Remodel Rec.Center Pool
Paint Ceiling in Gymnasium
Repair Rec. Center Roof
Playground equipment
Picnic tables
Barbecue grills
Electricity to City Park shelter
Water to City Park shelters
Plumbing to Hickory Hill Restroom
City Park Tennis Courts
Mercer Park Softball fields
Return Parking Fines
Loan Repayment, Parking Lot
As Per Bond Resolution
As Per Bond Resolution
35
27,000
16,500
15.000
10,000
3,000
2,500
s 5,000
1,500
3,000
49,000
16,000
192,000
20,000
60,000
624,800
1,005,970
17,476
3,500
6,000
58,500
90,000
896,800
TRANSFER FROM
POLLUTION CONTROL.-
Operations
ONTROL:Operations
Reserves
WATER:
Operations
I Reserves
LANDFILL:
Operations
AIRPORT:
Operations
TRUST 6 AGENCY FUND
ROAD USE TAX
GENERAL REVENUE SHARING
CDBG
TO
DESCRIPTION
Renewal 8 Improvement Reserve As Per Bond Resolution
Bond 8 Interest Sinking Reserve As Per Bond Resolution
Debt Service Defeased Abatement on GO Bonds
Bond 8 Interest Sinking Reserve Defeased Revenue Bonds
Depreciation, Extension d
Improvement Reserve
Debt Service As Per Bond Resolution
Abated GO Bonds
Bond 6 Interest Sinking Reserve Defeased Revenue Bonds
Landfill Reserve
Debt Service
Police Administration
Police Patrol
Police Criminal Investigation
Fire Department
Fire Pension b Retirement Syst
General Fund, Streets
General Fund, Traffic Engr.
Capital Improvements Project
Fire Department
JCCOG
36
Future Land Acquisition
Abated GO Bonds
Pension b Retirement
Pension 8 Retirement
Pension 8 Retirement
Pension b Retirement
Pension b Retirement
Operations
Operations
Benton/Sunset Signals
Ladder Truck
Human Services
AMOUNT
240,000
3,022 550 3,262,550 i
r
382,420
100,610 483,030
r;! 1
36,000 1 I
174,035 210,035
198,580
25,000 —
I �
33,000
16,214
227,074
30,777
401,752
20,873
1,388,104
621,986
26,000
TOTAL BUDGETED FUNDS
696,690
2,036,090
451,517
15,102
9,489,840
43
A
AMOUR v
DESCRIPTION
' _I
i
TRANSFER TO
_
TRANSFERS
UNBUDGETED FUNDS
Maintenance of Lots
7 , 522
7,000
General Fund, Cemetery
Truckster
640
PERPETUAL CARE TRUST
Tools
Addition to Cemetery Building
12,000
27,162
Capital Improvements Projects
85,756
Debt Service
Abated GO Bonds
150,000
SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
Interest Income
J
IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS
Debt Service
TOTAL UNBUDGETED
FUNDS
262,918
CAPITAL
9,7521758
GRAND TOTAL
it
a
A
' _I
i
r
Itoo
I
J•�
38
CITY OF IOWA CITY
II
FY88 OPERATING BUDGET
EXPANDED SERVICE LEVEL
REQUESTED
REQUESTS
ACTIVITY
BROADBAND TELECOMM,
DESCRIPTION
LIGHT KIT FOR PORTABLE PRODUCTIONS
0
UPGRADE 3/1 PRODUCTION COORDINATOR TO FULL-TIME
DATABASE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM WITH I.P.P. A GRAPHICS CAPABILITIES
CIVIL RIGHTS
ADD HALF-TIME POSITION, CIVIL RIGHTS ASSISTANT
ENERGY CONSERVATION
RESIDENTIAL HUT LOSS PROGRAM; TEMPORARY EMPLOYEE i COSTS
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
REMODEL OFFICE AND BREANROOM ARG FOR MORE SPACE AND BECURITY.
CITY CLERK
COMMUTER INTERFACE WITH RETRIEVAL SYSTEM
CITY ATTORNEY
UPGRADE ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY I TO TORT LITIGATOR
ADD 1 ATTORNEY TO BE CITY PROSECUTER
REMODEL RECEPTION ARG
0
PURCHASE MICROCASSETTS RECORDER i TRANSCRIBER
1,195
PURCHASE ELECTRONIC TELEPHONE SYSTEM
i
MICROCOMPUTER i SUPPLIES
0
ADDITIONS TO LAN LIBRARY
ACCOUNTING f REPORTING
BOOKCASE ($125)1 FILE CABINETS (0200); CREDENZA ($575)
WORD PROCESSING
ADDITIONAL 15MB OF STORAGE CAPACITY ON MPC SYSTEM.
DATA PROCESSING
COMPUTER UPGRADE (FIRST IN A 3 YEAR PLAN, TOTAL COST I8 $99,080)
2,000
COMPUTER OPERATOR, OFFICE FURNITURE, A EQUIPMENT
CREDENZA WITH SHELVES
PARKING OPERATIONS
PARKING METERS INSTALLED AT SOUTH EDGE OF CBD ARG.
0
PARKING METERS INSTALLED DORMITORY AREA (UI EAST SIDE)
26,973
PARKING 103TERS IN MERCY HOSPITAL AREA.
PARKING METERS INSTALLED EAST OF CBD AREA.
38
II
5'i I
REQUESTED
APPROVED
1,000
0
5,973
0
1
750
0
10,810
0
-
1,195
0.
i
17,000
0
j
2,000
0
1,163
0
26,973
0
100
0
210
0
5,000
0
1,850
p
950
950
I
900
900
r.
2,000
r..
0
r
]7,077
0
21,227
575
0
1/,50D
p}j
5,650
0
1,515
0
18,925
0
(Continued)
Wy
y
J
REQUESTED
APPROVED
EXPANDEDQSERVS L LEVEL
SRI
6,528
0
38,967
(Continued)
35,983
0
ACTIVITY
FIRE DEPARTMENT
DESCRIPTION
SPEAKERS TO 911 LINE AT STATIONS 2 6 �•
UPGRADE THREE FIREFIGHTERS TO -THE RANK OF LIEUTENANT
OPPICEPOSITION
2,265
0
CREATE A FIRE DEPT TRAINING
W SPECIALIST/INSPECTOR
A FIRE DEPT PUBLIC RCATION
0
21,000
CREATE
PURCHASE PUBLIC EDUCATION VIDEOS
VIDEO TRAINING TAPES FOR FIFEPERSONNEL
FIGHTING ION TRAINING
IN-STAT
�.
PURCHASE
PURCHASE THREE VIDEO CASSETTE RECORDERS POR
MATERIALS RESPONSR TEAM
FORMATION OF A HAZARDOUS
PAGERS FOR FIREFIGHTERS
I
HOUSING INSPECTION SERV
UPGRADE HOUSING INSPECTOR TO SR. HOUSING INSPECTOR.
THREE-QUARTER TINE LIBRARY CLERK FOR COLLECTION DEVELDPMENT
CLERK FOR COLLECTION DEVZWPMENT
R
LIBRARY
TIME SR. LIBRARY
ONE-HHAIJ TATIEME LIBRARY CLZRK TO WORK AT CHECK-OUT DESK
WITH CATALOGING
RECREATION
MOREAND BLOWER FFORCIRCUIATE RECREATION THROUGH THE U.S. MAIL
ONE-HALF TIME LIBRARIAN TO ASSIST
7 �1
PPRINT
TYPE SHOWCHURES
POOL VACUUM FOR RECREATION CENTER
BUILDINGS
WORK STUDY WAGES TO ASSIST ENERGY RANAOEMOF BUILDINGS
WITH
FOR WESER AND EARLY MORNINGS
SO
DRY MOUNTING/LAMINATING PRESS
WHEEL.CHAIR LIR VAN AND DRIVER FOR S.P.I.
GO NT
TEMPORARY EMPLOYEES
REQUESTED
APPROVED
1,000
SRI
6,528
0
38,967
0
0
35,983
0
1,589
0
2,265
0
1,350
0
21,000
0
21,500
4,046 0
15,597 0
17,046 0
10,704 0
13,085 0
2,106 0
4,521 0
1,000 1,000
17,000 0
2,300 2,300
150 150
721 0
8,536 0
450 0
38,000 0
480 480
7,000 "'306'0
360 2
280 00
6,000 6,000
320 320
1,200 00 0
22,232 0
(Continued)
W,
YiN
SRI
C.B.D. MAINTENANCEWyGE
A SMALL LEAP/LITTER VACUUM - $1,000
SWEEPER/VACUUM
d
STEAMER PRESSURE SPRAYER
PRINTING SERVICES - LANDSCAPE DESIGN PLANS
RENTALS OP SCRUBBER 6 BARRICADES
MAINTENANCE WORKER I
ADD A FULL-TIME
FORESTRY/HORTICULTURE
500 GALLON NATER TANK
AERIAL LIR TRUCK (SOON TRUCK)
TO MEASURE WOOD DENSITY (ROTTED OR SOUND ROOD
SHIGOKETER - INSTRUMENT USED
TURF TRUCKSTER WITH DUMP BOX
I
CEMETERY
GAS POWERED SUMP PUMP
GAS POWERED HEDGE TRIMMER
RECREATION
MOREAND BLOWER FFORCIRCUIATE RECREATION THROUGH THE U.S. MAIL
1.4
PPRINT
TYPE SHOWCHURES
POOL VACUUM FOR RECREATION CENTER
DRY MOUNTING/LAMINATING PRESS
WHEEL.CHAIR LIR VAN AND DRIVER FOR S.P.I.
4,046 0
15,597 0
17,046 0
10,704 0
13,085 0
2,106 0
4,521 0
1,000 1,000
17,000 0
2,300 2,300
150 150
721 0
8,536 0
450 0
38,000 0
480 480
7,000 "'306'0
360 2
280 00
6,000 6,000
320 320
1,200 00 0
22,232 0
(Continued)
W,
YiN
(Continued)
EXPANDED SERVICE LEVEL
REQUESTS
ACTIVITY
PA'S
DESCRIPTION
NATER SUPPLY TO PICNIC SHELTERS IN CITY PARK
UTILITY SPREADER (SALT/SAND SPREADING) FOR 4WD
TRUCK
TEMPORARY MAINTENANCE WORKER TO CLEAN RESTROONS, FUNDED BY SHELTER FEES
PARKS A RECREATION ADMIN CREDENZA FOR DIRECTOR
CARPET OFFICES IN RECREATION CENTER
ADDITIONAL DUES 6 MEMBERSHIPS FOR STAFF L COKDHSSION MEMBERS
POSTAGE STAMPS FOR RECREATION CENTER OFFICE
ROUND TABLE TO MATCH DIRECTOR'S DESK A CREDENZA
P.P.D. ADMINISTRATION
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY FOR MAKING MAPS
URBAN PLANNING L DEVELOP% DUES A MEMBERSHIPS FOR PLANNING A ZONING COMMISSIONERS
PATROL
1 POUR -COMPARTMENT EVIDENCE LOCKER
1 FOUR -COMPARTMENT GUN LOCKER
12 KEL FLASHLIGHTS WITH BATTERY CHARGERS
19 LOCKERS FOR OFFICERS' LOCKER ROOMS
15 POLICE OFFICERS i EQUIPMENT
24 HAND-HELD RADIOS, MICS, RECEIVERS 6 2 12 -UNIT CHARGERS
2 FULLY EQUIPPED SQUAD CARS FOR ESL OFFICERS
1 TRAFFIC CONROL/ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION VEHICLE
5 SNOT GUNS
CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION
1 SURVEILLANCE RADIOS
RECORDS i IDENTIFICATION
6 FULL-TIME DISPATCHERS FOR 2/ HOUR CIVILIAN DISPATCHING
SHELVING FOR STORAGE IN JAIL CELIA
I 1-COMPARTKeNT STORAGE DIN FOR LOST/FOUND ITCHES.
2 CLERK TYPISTS FOR RECORDS ROOM
FREE STANDING AIR CONDITIONER FOR RADIO ROOM PLUS OUTLET
AND INeTALLATION
STAND-BY POWER MODULE FOR COMPUTRR
pLUS INSTALLATION.
COMPUTER UPGRADE
SHELVESWALL STORAGE AT FRONT DISK
UPGRADEI DESK CLERK(CABINETS
ADDFROM FRONT DESK) TOO ASSIST IN
S CLERKF OR SECRETARIAL DUTIES
FRONT DESK
IFULL-THE DESKRRK
CL,, IK HALF -TINE DESK CLERK FOR WEEKENDS i LATE -NIGHTS
RHINAL CONTROL
USED MICROSCOpE TO DO BLOOD TESTS
40
REQUESTED APPROVED 0'
1,500 1,500
7,000 0
7,562 7,562 1
! I
575 575
2,600 0
125 0
100 0
700 700
7,000 0 j
' I
215 215
100 100
250 250
1,110 0
6,750 0
121,770 0
19,000 0
29,200 0
19,500 0
1,500 1,500
,n
7,010 0
h
172,796 0 0.1
11400 100 1,100
100
10,922 0
6,000 0
1,150 p
7!,700 p
600 600
2,8/8 0
10,188 0
70,615 p
i 1y
720 0 ,
(Continued)
G3 "'
_ EXPANDED SERVICE LEVEL
REQUESTS
•
(Continued)
5,000
i
-
ACTIVITY
TRANSIT OPERATIONS
DESCRIPTION
MARKETING/PROMOTIONAL ACTIVITIES
j
1
0
INFO CENTER DOWNTOWN ($1,000 CITY i $4,000 UHTA GRANT)
3,000
i
ENGINEERING
MICROFILM READER/PRINTER
0
I
_i
j
0
MICRO -FILMING - UPON RECEIPT OF AN OLD READER/PRINTER
i
31,075
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
ADDITONAL PAINT AND REFLECTORIZING BEADS TO PAINT LINES i LANES TWICE/YEAR
4,000
7,000
0
FOUR-PHASE CONTROLLER TO BE USED FOR TESTING 4 AS A SACK -UP
0
5,040
STREET SYSTEM MAINTENANCE 2 ADDITIONAL TEMPORARY EMPLOYEES
POLLUTION CONTROL OPER
CHEMICAL SAFE TO STORE HAZARDOUS CHEMICALS IN THE LABORATORY
�ASSISTANT
SUPERINTENDANT TO BE TRAINED BEFORE RETIREMENT OF CURRENT ONE
SEWER TAPPING
MACHINE
WATER OPERATIONS
MICRO -COMPUTER
SENIOR CENTER
UPGRADE HALF-TIME VOLUNTEER SPECIALIST TO FULL -TIRE
100 STACKING CHAIRS
REQUESTED
APPROVED
5,000
0
1,000
0
4,500
0
4,000
3,000
8,075
0
7,000
0
6,720
0
7,000
3,000
31,075
0
4,000
4,000
7,000
0
14,439
0
5,040
0
------------------
GRAND TOTAL 1,402,296 40,472
N1
TOTAL
FY88TOPERATING BUDGET
ADMINISTRATIVE RECEIPTS SUMMARY
FY86
ACTUAL
REVISED
ESTIMATE
PROPOSED
BUDGET
1,405,336
339,066
1,569,800
380,077
1,659,320
511,793
29,177
13,543
28,816
13,800
28,416
13,800
83,467
122093
117,228
117,228
3S 184,942
31 537
:EBACR
162,000
162,000
499;800
279,034
546,583
250,000
568,325
250;000
E 77,618
324,004
339,718
337,899
52,635
82,517
52,635
75,000
52,635
100,000
76,368
RING 306;902
193 299
96x298
21,963
PRISE FUND 172,448
FER 109,891
7,500
r
203,6603
68,398
0
212,000
24,639
----------
_ 9,156
-----�---
8,556
r
4,236,980
4,245,635
_ _
4,373,146
a�=avaeoee
===ae=ee.a
ea.oa.ovice
NOTE: SEE ADMINISTRATIVE RECEIPT SUMMARY FOR DETAILED RECEIPTS
43
°
CITY OF IOWA CITY
RECEIPTSBANDPEXPENDITURRESESUMMARY
11110 CITY COUNCIL
EXPENDITURES:
FY86 - FY87
ACTUAL ADOPTED
BUDGET
BUDGET ----
REVISED
---_ FY88
DEPT
BUDGET --
PROPOSED
PERSONAL
ESTIMATE
REQUEST
BUDGET
SERVICES
COMMODITIES -
SERVICES AND CHARGES
36,088 36500
36,088
36'580
36,088
CAPITAL OUTLAY
249,181
X122 270,7805
500
267,5401
271,772,
500
TOTAL
__286,173
78,473
0
307,373
-
304,129
=====3_==
-
"-'----0
308,360
115,061
vs:-"=
�ftw as
NOTE: SEE ADMINISTRATIVE RECEIPT SUMMARY FOR DETAILED RECEIPTS
43
CITY OF IOWA CITY
FY88 OPERATING BUDGET
EXPENDITURES
11110 CITY COUNCIL
i
PERSONAL SERVICES:
FTE BUDGET NONE
FY87 FY88 $
CITY COUNCIL 600 600 ---30,077
MAYOR 1.00 1.00 61011
-
TOTAL 7 -
.00 7.00 36,088
TRANSFER TO:
TOTAL
---------
QYiCC==O=
INTRA -CITY CHARGEBACRS:
VEHICLE OPERATIONS 50
VEHICLE REPLACEMENT 0
-I
WORD PROCESSING 0
ADMINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD 0
CBD MAINTENANCE 0
TOTAL 50
i
CAPITAL OUTLAY:
NONE 0
TOTAL 0
i
i,
44
FY88YOPERATINGCBUDGET
RECEIPTS AND EXPENDITURES SUMMARY
11120 CITY CLERK
EXPENDITURES:
FY86--
ACTUAL
FY87
ADOPTED
BUDGET
BUDGET ----
REVISED
---- FY88
DEPT
BUDGET ----
PROPOSED
ESTIMATE
REQUEST
BUDGET
PERSONAL SERVICES
COMMODITIES
79,614
86'969
86,015
SERVICES AND CHARGES
CAPITAL OUTLAY
1;160
41 910
X4900
969
91,451
1,216
91,451
1,216
17,2_50
24'924
900
39,554
12,122
122
39,554
TOTAL
139 934
maasavaas
------900
113,045
asaaaaaaa
------900
112,808
:<asasasaa
---12
144,343
195
---------
132,416
aasamaaaa
ssaaasaaa
NOTE: SEE ADMINISTRATIVE RECEIPT
SUMMARY FOR DETAILED RECEIPTS
45
of
CITY OF IOWA CITY
FY88 OPERATING BUDGET
EXPENDITURES
11120 CITY CLERK
! PERSONAL SERVICES:
FTE BUDGET NONE
FY87 FY88 -_$_--
ADMINISTRATIVE CLERK/TYPIST 1.00 1.00 17,597
DEPUTY CITY CLERK 1.00 1.00 22,838
CITY CLERK 1.00 1.00 27,643
SR. CLERK/TYPIST MINUTETAKER (PT) .25 .25 4,690
BENEFITS ___18,683
TOTAL 3 2
TRANSFER TO:
0
TOTAL --------0
5 3.25 91,451 INTRA -CITY CHARGEBACKS:
VEHICLE OPERATIONS 50
VEHICLE REPLACEMENT
WORD
GOVERHEAD 0
_ CBD MAINTENANCE 0
TOTAL 50
CAPITAL OUTLAY:
1 TASK CHAIR
TOTAL
• i AA
0 f:
V
96
i.
-_--__195
------195
PERSONAL SERVICES
COMMODITIES
SERVICES AND CHARGES
CAPITAL OUTLAY
TOTAL
CITY OF IOWA CITY
FY88 OPERATING BUDGET
RECEIPTS AND EXPENDITURES SUMMARY
11130 CITY ATTORNEY
NOTE: SEE ADMINISTRATIVE RECEIPT SUMMARY FOR DETAILED RECEIPTS
47
-- FY87
BUDGET ----
---- FY88
BUDGET -- ,
FY86
ADOPTED
REVISED
DEPT
PROPOSED
ACTUAL
BUDGET
ESTIMATE
REQUEST
BUDGET
158,324
8,742
172,233
71400
172,459
7,400
180,714
9,584
180,714 �I
9,384
! I
i
25,537
20,343
20,343
23,364
22,964 .y
}
235
------235
8,495
1,175
i
----2_456
195,059
-----
200,211
200,437
222,157
214,237
vasavas_a
-_ ssaaaasa
sasaavaaa
aaaaaysaa
aaa:asaaa
NOTE: SEE ADMINISTRATIVE RECEIPT SUMMARY FOR DETAILED RECEIPTS
47
TRANSFER TO:
NONE 0
TOTAL --0
INTRA -CITY CHARGEBACES:
VEHICLE REPLACEMENT 50
WORD
GOVERHEAD 0
CBD MAINTENANCE 0
0
TOTAL 50
CAPITAL OUTLAY:
STORAGEBCABINET 570
EXECUTIVE CHAIR 265
TOTAL 1,175
FY88YOPERATINGCBUDGET
EXPENDITURES
11130 CITY ATTORNEY
�i
PERSONAL SERVICES:
FTE BUDGET
FY67 FY88 $
ADMIN. SEC. - LEGAL
ASST CITY ATTORNEY I
1. 00 00 1. 22,007
ASST. CITY ATTORNEY II
CITY ATTORNEY
1.00 1.00 31,304
1.00 1.00 39,915
TEMPORARIES
1.00 1.00 52,733
BENEFITS
1,500
_ _
TOTAL
__ __ ___33,255
4.00 4.00 180,714
1
-t
i
w
48
l\+.»r.^»P.
TRANSFER TO:
NONE 0
TOTAL --0
INTRA -CITY CHARGEBACES:
VEHICLE REPLACEMENT 50
WORD
GOVERHEAD 0
CBD MAINTENANCE 0
0
TOTAL 50
CAPITAL OUTLAY:
STORAGEBCABINET 570
EXECUTIVE CHAIR 265
TOTAL 1,175
r
CITY OF IOWA CITY
RECEIPTSBANDPEPENDITUURESESUMMARY
11140 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
EXPENDITURES:
FY86
- FY87
ADOPTED
BUDGET - -
REVISED
---EPTY88
BUDGET -
PROPOSED
ACTUAL
BUDGET
ESTIMATE
REQUEST
BUDGET !
PERSONAL SERVICES 0
0.Il
SERVICES AND CHARGES 40,033
---------
40,000
---------
40,000
---------
40 000
31,590 j
I
TOTAL 40,033
aaaavaaaaa
40,000
40,000
-----1___
71,590
___40,000
71,590 jl
aasaaaasa
sassaaasa
aaxaasa:s
asa:aa:aa ��$ � -
NOTE: SEE ADMINISTRATIVE RECEIPT SUMMARY FOR DETAILED RECEIPTS
49
ii
j
CITY OF IOWA CITY
FY88 OPERATING BUDGET
EXPENDITURES
11140 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
I
PERSONAL SERVICES:
TRANSFER TO:
-J
FTE BUDGET
NONE 0
TOTAL 0
i
J
FY87 FY88 $
j
ASSOCIATE PLANNER 1-00
J
-1.00
BENEFITS 4,581
---27,009
TOTAL 1.00 1.00 31,590
as:ss aasaa �_====av
i
INTRA -CITY CHARGEBACKS:
VEHICLE OPERATIONS 0
VEHICLE REPLACEMENT 0
WORD PROCESSING 0
OVERHEAD 0
CBDIMAINTENANCC
I
TOTAL 0
CAPITAL OUTLAY:
TOTAL 0
NOTE: SEE ADMINISTRATIVE RECEIPT SUMMARY FOR DETAILED RECEIPTS
51
c
CITY OF IOWA CITY
RECEIPTS BANDPEXPENDITURESESUMMARY
11210 CITY MANAGER
EXPENDITURES:
-- PY87
FY86 ADOPTED
ACTUAL BUDGET
BUDGET ----
REVISED
-- FY88
DEPT
BUDGET --
PROPOSED
ESTIMATE
REQUEST
BUDGET
PERSONAL SERVICES
COMMODITIES
146,869 145,580
2,117
152,167
160,017
161,217
SERVICES AND CHARGES
CAPITAL OUTLAY
43'802 39'929
'593
2,327
46,271
2,253
26,811
2,253
26,9930
TRANSFERS OUT
20;000
19,296
p
0
0 ___21
0
TOTAL
193,381 207,836
aasaaxxxa aaaaaxx.x
220,082
aaxxxexox
189,081
--
190,463
--_oxcxxe
aexevxxex
NOTE: SEE ADMINISTRATIVE RECEIPT SUMMARY FOR DETAILED RECEIPTS
51
c
' CITY OF IOWA CITY
-1 FY88 OPERATING BUDGET
EXPENDITURES
11210 CITY MANAGER
TRANSFER TO:
TOTAL
TOTAL 3.00 3.00 _-161,2_17 INTRA—CITY CHARGEBACKS:
=
140
VEHICLE OPERATIONS 1:520
VEHICLE REPLACEMENT
w WORD PROCESSING 0
1' bi
ADMINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD
VERHEAD 0
S �n TOTAL ====2_668
CAPITAL OUTLAY:
TOTAL
0
-1
PERSONAL SERVICES:
FTE
BUDGET NONE
J
FY87—
FY88
$
}
ADMIN. ASST. —
CITY MANAGER 1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
23,941
39,915
J
ASSISTANT CITY
CITY MANAGER
MANAGER
1.00
1.00
62,000
TEMPORARIES
34,156
BENEFITS
TRANSFER TO:
TOTAL
TOTAL 3.00 3.00 _-161,2_17 INTRA—CITY CHARGEBACKS:
=
140
VEHICLE OPERATIONS 1:520
VEHICLE REPLACEMENT
w WORD PROCESSING 0
1' bi
ADMINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD
VERHEAD 0
S �n TOTAL ====2_668
CAPITAL OUTLAY:
TOTAL
0
-1
)06
to
EXPENDITURES:
PERSONAL SERVICES
COMMODITIES
SERVICES AND CHARGES
CAPITAL OUTLAY
oil, i y,`!
CITY OF IOWA CITY
FY88 OPERATING BUDGET
RECEIPTS AND EXPENDITURES SUMMARY
11220 HUMAN RELATIONS
NOTE: SEE ADMINISTRATIVE RECEIPT SUMMARY FOR DETAILED RECEIPTS
53
-- FY87
BUDGET ----
---- FY88
BUDGET ----
PROPOSED
ACTUAL
UUDGET
ESTIMATE
REQUEST
-
92,318
2,483
102,022
2,730
88,562
2 730
93,760
3,588
93,760 j
3,588
39,108
48,331
48;330
53,480
53,480
0
0
--
133,909
153,083
139,623
150,829
150,829
aaaaaaaa�
asasasaaa
aastaaa�a
vvaasaasaa
sasaasaas.
NOTE: SEE ADMINISTRATIVE RECEIPT SUMMARY FOR DETAILED RECEIPTS
53
i-
X11
CITY OF IOWA CITY
FY88 OPERATING BUDGET
EXPENDITURES
11220 HUMAN RELATIONS
J PERSONAL SERVICES:
FTE BUDGET NONE
FY87 FY88 $ TOTAL
PERSONNEL ASSISTANT 2.00 2.00 41,319
-�
PERSONNEL 1.00 1.00 32,157
BENEFITS 300
19_984
- 'TOTAL _3_00 -3_00 93,760
TRANSFER TO:.
INTRA -CITY CHARGEBACKS:
VEHICLE OPERATIONS
VEHICLE REPLACEMENT
WORD PROCESSING
ADMINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD
CBD MAINTENANCE
TOTAL
0
0
2500
0
0
0
250
CAPITAL OUTLAY:
NONE 0
.' i
_l TOTAL --------0
54
„moi I. tMA Vk il11 I 1., ..•
EXPENDITURES:
PERSONAL SERVICES
COMMODITIES
SERVICES AND CHARGES
CAPITAL OUTLAY
TRANSFERS OUT
TOTAL
:l
NOTE: SEE ADMINISTRATIVE RECEIPT SUMMARY FOR DETAILED RECEIPTS
55
YI
CITY OF
IOWA CITY
RECEIPTS AND
11230 BROADBAND
TELECOMMUNICATIONS
r
i
� � 1
86
-- FY87 BUDGET ----
BUDGET
---- FY88
BUDGET ----
PROPOSED
! I
ACCTUAL
ESTIMATE
REQUEST
�I
49,542
11592
51,922 53,158
2;105 2,105
56,084
2,321
56,084
2 321
I I I
25,922
1 206
10,751 20,751
13,296
12,940
-
34,518
26,414 26,414 25;333
17,476
112,780
91,192 102,428
101,234
88,821
aaaasasaa
assasaaaa sasaasaas
aasaaaasa
aaxssasaa
NOTE: SEE ADMINISTRATIVE RECEIPT SUMMARY FOR DETAILED RECEIPTS
55
_
hi�i
--
CITY OF IOWA CITY
V
FY88 OPERATING BUDGET
i
EXPENDITURES
'
11230 BROADBAND TELECOMMUNICATIONS
PERSONAL SERVICES:
TRANSFER TO:
FTE BUDGET LIBRARY
PUBLIC ACCESS 3,540
13,936
------ LIBRARY
A. V. ASST.
FY87 FY88 $
TOTAL ---17,476
J
J
BROADBAND TELE. SPECIALIST 1.00 1.00 30,368
- BTC (PT) .75 .75 15,586
PRODUCTION COORDINATOR
TEMPORARIES 9,680
BENEFITS - ----- ----- ---
-----
TOTAL -1_75 -1_75 ---56,084
-
INTRA -CITY CHARGEHACKS:
h
VEHICLE OPERATIONS 50
VEHICLE REPLACEMENT 1 908
WORD PROCESSING
ADMINISTRATIVOVERHEAD 4,291CBD MAINTENANCE0
TOTAL ----6,249
CAPITAL OUTLAY:
NONE 0
TOTAL 0
CITY OF IOWA CITY
FY88 OPERATING BUDGET
RECEIPTS AND EXPENDITURES SUMMARY
11310 FINANCE ADMINISTRATION
EXPENDITURES:
NOTE: SEE ADMINISTRATIVE RECEIPT SUMMARY FOR DETAILED RECEIPTS
57
-- FY87
BUDGET ----
---- FY88
BUDGET ----
FY86
ADOPTED
REVISED
DEPT
PROPOSED
ACTUAL
BUDGET
ESTIMATE
REQUEST
BUDGET
PERSONAL SERVICES
144,268
155,274
157,638
165,302
165,302
COMMODITIES
4,942
1,070
1,070
1,207
1,207
SERVICES AND CHARGES
14,175
9,166
9,166
12,125
11,525
CAPITAL OUTLAY
3,594
175
175
1,070
980
TOTAL
166,979
165,685
168,049
179,704
179,014
saaavasaa
asaaasav:a
aavaaaaaa
vavvaaaaa
avvaaaaaa
NOTE: SEE ADMINISTRATIVE RECEIPT SUMMARY FOR DETAILED RECEIPTS
57
F CITY OF IOWA CITY
Y'a OPEBUD
11310 FIEXPENDIRATINGTUp GET
FINANCE A _ tS
DMlHISTRATIom
PERSONAL SERVICES:
FTE BUDGETNONE TRANSFER To:
ADMIN SEC FY87
FY8s
SR. A6COUX-T6FIMANCE TOTAL --------
ASST. FINANCE T - FINANCE ADMI 1.00 1.00 22 0
FINANCE DIRECTDIRECTOR 1 00 1.00 P838
TEMpORAR OR 1:00 1 00 25,251
OVERTIME IES
BENEFITS 1.00 1.00 31,970
53,123
570
TOTAL ----- ----- 31,450
4===
J.00 --- INTRA -CITY caMr
==165302==EBACKS:
VEHICLE OPERA
VEHICLE REPUTIONS
WORD PROCESS CEMENT ISO
ADMINISTRATIVE 0
CBD MAINTENANCE
OVERHEAD 0
NTEfljWCZ 0
0
TOTAL ----
ISO
CAPITAL
OUTLAY:
TASK
CREDENZA-ACHAIR-R ACCT, A --ASST; FIN. DIR. 225
TOTAL ------
58
-I
CITY OF IOWA CITY
FY88 OPERATING BUDGET
RECEIPTS AND EXPENDITURES SUMMARY
11320 ACCOUNTING & REPORTING
NVI UNSS:
FY87
BUDGET
---- FY88
BUDGET ----
FY86
ADOPTED
REVISED
DEPT
PROPOSES
ACTUAL
BUDGET
ESTIMATE
REQUEST
BUDGET
PERSONAL SERVICES
203,255
213,528
214,689
224,742
224,742
COMMODITIES
2,142
1,587
1,587
2,153
2,153
SERVICES AND CHARGES
42,377
44,361
44,361
42,921
43,971
CAPITAL OUTLAY
4,495
0
79
0
900
TOTAL
252,269
259,476
260,716
269,816
271,766
aasaaaaas
aaaassaaa
ssaassass
aasaaaasa
ssaasaaaa
NOTE: SEE ADMINISTRATIVE RECEIPT SUMMARY FOR DETAILED RECEIPTS
59
-I
CITY OF IOWA CITY
FY88 OPERATING BUDGET
EXPENDITURES
11720 ACCOUNTING & REPORTING
PERSONAL SERVICES:
FTE BUDGET NONE
FY87 FY88 $
ACCOUNT CLERK - ACCOUNTING
1.00
1.00
18,136
SR. ACCOUNT CLERK - ACCOUNTIN
1.00
1.00
20,842
ADN IN.ACCT.CLERK-ACCOUNTING
2.00
2.00
42,516
ACCOUNTANT
1.00
1.00
25,522
SR. ACCOUNTANT -ACCOUNTING
1.00
1.00
23,566
CONTROLLER
1.00
1.00
33 446
SR. ACCOUNTANT -ACCOUNTING (PT)
.50
.50
12,600
OVERTIME
BENEFITS
_
_ _
47,614
TOTAL
7.50
7.50
224,742
60
TRANSFER TO:
TOTAL
INTRA -CITY CHAR
VEHICLE OPERATIONS
VEHICLE REPLACEMENT
WORD PROCESSING
ADMINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD
CBD MAINTENANCE
TOTAL
CAPITAL OUTLAY:
ESL- VERTICAL FILE
ESL- CREDENZA
ESL -OPEN BOOKCASE
TOTAL
0
0
0
0
0
0
200
57
125
900
EXPENDITURES:
PERSONAL SERVICES
COMMODITIES
CAPITAL OUUTTLACHARGES
TOTAL
CITY OF
IOWA CITY
FY88 OPERATING BUDGET
RECEIPTS AND EXPENDITURES SUMMARY
11330 CENTRAL PROCUREMENT &
SERVICES
-- FY87
BUDGET ----
---- FY88
BUDGET --
PROPOSED
AFCTUAL
BUDGET
ESTIMATE
REQUEST
134,991
137,963
1,565
140,391
1,565
123,414
2,005
123,414
1,855
1,248
61 214
61,390
61,390
69; 25
6752
51925
200,801
194,946
-
.m200,925
�s2033,353
aa195,496
NOTE: SEE ADMINISTRATIVE RECEIPT SUMMARY FOR DETAILED RECEIPTS
61
J
71
TOTAL
TRANSFER TO:
___ _ __ __ _ 25,692 INTRA -CITY CHARGEBACKS:
TOTAL 4.22 4.22 123,414 VEHICLE OPERATIONS
I -I as=a= ==a== a=====mea VEHICLE 0
----------------
- * Du licatl M -------
0
WORD PROCESSING 0
ADMINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD 0
CBD MAINTENANCE 0
0
TOTAL 0
CAPITAL OUTLAY:
2HDRAWEECK RGFILE CABINET 5'225
1 TASK CHAIR
TOTAL 5,925
. 1 p ng achene Operator: 10% of FTE is shown here; remainder funded In Central Supply &
J Print.
62
ro.E�
FY88YOPERATINGCBUDGET
11330
CENTRALxPROCUREMENT & SERVICES
PERSONAL SERVICES:
FTE BUDGET NONE
FY87
FY88 $
SR- CLERK/TYPIST - PURCHASING
*DUPLICATING
1.00
1.00
MACHINE OPERATOR
BUYER
18,761
1,876
PURCHASING AGENT
CLERK/TYPIST-SWITCHBOARD (PT)
1.00
1.00
1.12
1.00
1.00 22,381
1.12 33,488
TEMPORARIES
19,616
BENEFITS
1,600
TOTAL
TRANSFER TO:
___ _ __ __ _ 25,692 INTRA -CITY CHARGEBACKS:
TOTAL 4.22 4.22 123,414 VEHICLE OPERATIONS
I -I as=a= ==a== a=====mea VEHICLE 0
----------------
- * Du licatl M -------
0
WORD PROCESSING 0
ADMINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD 0
CBD MAINTENANCE 0
0
TOTAL 0
CAPITAL OUTLAY:
2HDRAWEECK RGFILE CABINET 5'225
1 TASK CHAIR
TOTAL 5,925
. 1 p ng achene Operator: 10% of FTE is shown here; remainder funded In Central Supply &
J Print.
62
ro.E�
FY88YOPERATINGCBUDGET
RECEIPTS AND EXPENDITURES SUMMARY
11340 TREASURY
EXPENDITURES:
NJ
FY86
-- FY87
ADOPTED
BUDGET ----
REVISED
DEPTY88
BUDGET POSE
ACTUAL
BUDGET
ESTIMATE
REQUEST
PROPOSED
BUDGET
e
PERSONAL SERVICES
COMMODITIES
259 912
1910
274'529
278,775
293,684
293,092
w i
SERVICES AND CHARGES
CAPITAL OUTLAY
13,622
'975
12;970
14;391
151694
13;131
2_8_10
315
'7
TOTAL
276,419
vavvaamaa
_
293,865
Qmm�moma
297,951
_6_075
317,789
308,658
mvmaam951
vm317,789
amssmsaia
NOTE: SEE ADMINISTRATIVE RECEIPT
SUMMARY FOR DETAILED RECEIPTS
I
t�
f
63
•
CITY OF IOWA CITY
FY88
OPERATING
7
11340 TREASURY
PERSONAL SERVICES:
FTE BUDGET
FY87
FY88 $
CASHIER
-
CLERK//TYPIST
TREASURY 1.00
1.0.0 16,881
ACCOUNT
— TREASURY 3.00
CLERK
3.00 55,558
SR. CLERK`TYPIST
— TREASURY 2.00
2.00 38,896
SR.ACCT.
— TREASURY 1.00
CLERK—TREAS.UTILITIE 1.00
1.00 19,926
CUSTOMER
SERVICE
1.00 20,842
J ACCOUNTANT
REP 1-00
1.00 19,945
TREASTEMPORARIES
i
1.00
1.00 22,178
1.00
1.00 33,275
OVERTIME
j BENEFITS
1,230
-----
64,268
TOTAL 11.00
11.00 293,092
J
"I
i
64
NONE
TRANSFER TO:
TOTAL
INTRA—CITY CHARGEBACKS:
0
VEHICLE OPERATIONS 0
VEHICLE REPLACEMENT 0
WORD PROCESSING
ADMINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD 0
CBD MAINTENANCE 0
TOTAL 0
CAPITAL OUTLAY:
1 TASK CHAIR _ 315
TOTAL 315
i
CITY OF IOWA CITY
RECEIPTSBANDPEXPENDITURESESUMMARY
11360 WORD PROCESSING
EXPENDITURES:
FY86
- FY87
ADOPTED
BUDGET ----
REVISED
---- FY88
DEPT
BUDGET ----
PROPOSED
• i
ACTUAL
BUDGET
ESTIMATE
REQUEST
BUDGET
PERSONAL SERVICES
CONNODITIES
96,025
97,410
102,082
105,551
105,551
�i
SERVICES AND CHARGES
CAPITAL OUTLAY
22,4155
,
2,700
23,716
2,700
9,549
2,365
10,395
2,586
10,395
-_ 8_2_32
235
-------
12,402
13,114
13_114
TOTAL
127,950
a�es_s�
124,061
----- ---
126,733
-�--- --_
131,425
--_-_ ___
131,646
�.
sasaevaa:v
aacaa�vva
aaaaaaaaa
asaaaaaaa.
_ I I
i
NOTE: SEE ADMINISTRATIVE RECEIPT
SUMMARY FOR DETAILED RECEIPTS
i I
.a
a
65
WORD PROCESSING SUP
TEMPORARIES
ORT
BENEFITS
TOTAL
FY88YOPERATINGCBUDGET
11360 WORD
PERSONAL SERVICES:
FTE BUDGET
FY87 FY88 $
BATOR 3.00 3.00 57
ERVISOR 1.00 1.00 .408
26,936
1265
__ __ _19_442
=4=-0= =4_00 105,551
NONE
TRANSFER TO:
TOTAL
INTRA -CITY CHARGEBACKS:
0
0
VEHICLE OPERATIONS
WORDC ROCESSINGG 0
ADMINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD 0 0
CBD MAINTENANCE
0
0
TOTAL
0
CAPITAL OUTLAY:
3aCOMPUTERNOPERATORICHHAAIRS 12,169
___ 945
TOTAL 13,114
_=======
II J
t ^'
66
�('.:•V
y„r,
�y
EXPENDITURES=
PERSONAL SERVICE'
SERVICES AND C MGES
CAPITAL OUTLAY
TOTAL
CITY OF IOWA CITY
FY88 NDEPEDIESE
RECEIPTS AXNTURS1*'ARY
11370 DATA PROCESSING
_ __-- FY88 BUDGET
-- FY87 BUDGET
--- BUDGET
FY86 ADOPTED ESTIMATE REQUEST
BUDGET
ACTUAL 53,260 58,224
55,381 5��615 37,,645
50,850 g 371 8,371 37,645 16,714
6,674 40,949 40,949 16_714 -----
30,926 70460 .4 ---- --------8 1201198
138381 --------- --- 148'951
-- 173, x_148, a saaaaaaaa
226,831 _040
yzzaxxx=
9
NOTE; SEE ADMINISTRATIVE RECEIPT SUF4IARY FOR DETAILED RECEIPTS
67
`t
68
TRANSFER TO:
TOTAL
INTRA -CITY CHARGEBACKS:
VEHICLE OPERATIONS
0
WORD PROCESSING 0
ADMINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD 0
CBD MAINTENANCE 0
0
TOTAL 0
=vovvav==
CAPITAL OUTLAY:
LINE PRINTER
2 TERMINALS
TOTAL
15,114
1,600
16,714
====aoa=v
FY88YOPERATINGCBUDGET
EXPENDITURES
11370 DATA PROCESSING
PERSONAL
SERVICES:
FTE BUDGET NONE
FY87 FY88 $
SYSTEMS SPECIALIST
INFORMATION SPECIALIST
1.00 1.00 21,300
BENEFITS
100 25,022
-1.00
- __ 11,902
:I
TOTAL
_
2.00 2.00 58,224
asv=v cvava a=vasssas
68
TRANSFER TO:
TOTAL
INTRA -CITY CHARGEBACKS:
VEHICLE OPERATIONS
0
WORD PROCESSING 0
ADMINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD 0
CBD MAINTENANCE 0
0
TOTAL 0
=vovvav==
CAPITAL OUTLAY:
LINE PRINTER
2 TERMINALS
TOTAL
15,114
1,600
16,714
====aoa=v
CITY OF IOWA CITY
FY88 OPERATING BUDGET
RECEIPTS AND EXPENDITURES SUMMARY
11400 RISK MANAGEMENT
EXPENDITURES:
FY86
-- FY87
ADOPTED
BUDGET ----
REVISED
-- ;i FY88
DEPT
BUDGET ----
PROPOSED
ACTUAL
BUDGET
ESTIMATE
REQUEST
BUDGET
SERVICES AND CHARGES 709,491
TRANSFERS OUT 0
882,4380
1172_26
906,155
573,300 _
__ __
i
0
0
TOTAL 709,491
aaavcvaca
_
882,438
_ __
661,424
------
906,155
573,300
aaccaaccc
aacccoccc
cc906,155
cc573,300
1
NOTE: SEE ADMINISTRATIVE RECEIPT SUMMARY FOR DETAILED RECEIPTS
69
i�
-,
CITY OF IOWA CITY
FY88 OPERATING BUDGET
RECEIPTS EXPENDITURESSNUMMMARY
ANNDDGS
VEXXPENDIRNMENT
EXPENDITURES:
-- FY87
BUDGET ----
---- FY88
BUDGET ----
FY86 ADOPTED
REVISED
DEPT
PROPOSED
ACTUAL BUDGET
ESTIMATE
REQUEST
BUDGET
J PERSONAL SERVICES
40,809 43,407
6,597 91040
44,127
91040
46,505
91220
46,505
81830
COMMODITIES
i SERVICES AND CHARGES
105,3420 114,020
124;120
121;600
117,3500
CAPITAL OUTLAY
0 0
0
0
O
TRANSFERS OUT
------ _ _
___
TOTAL -
_
152,748 166,470
177,883
181,958
172,685
.
t �
sasssaysa svavvssss
vayssysaa
axavaavma
xvssyssss
CITY OF IOWA CITY
FY88 OPERATING BUDGET
EXPENDITURES
11500 GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS
PERSONAL SERVICES:
FTE BUDGET NONE
FY87 FY88 $
M.W.I-RECREATION Q GVMT BLDGS 2.00 2.00 34,757
TEMPORARIES 1,890
BENEFITS 9,858
TOTAL 2.00 2.00 46,505
- aasaa aaaaa aaaasaaaa
i
1
TRANSFER TO:
0 ri I
TOTAL
=:asaasaa i�
i
i
INTRA -CITY CHARGEBACES: f
VEHICLE OPERATIONS 50
VEHICLE REPLACEMENT 0
WORD PROCESSING 0
ADMINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD 0
CBD MAINTENANCE 0
TOTAL 50
!y
CAPITAL OUTLAY:
NONE 0
TOTAL --------p
�1!.
aaaaaaaaa
,n
r'
71
II
FY88YOPERATINGCBUDGET
RECEIPTS11A1600ECIVILITURESRIGHTSPRY
-1
EXPENDITURES:
f
J
ACTUAL
---- FY87
ADOPTED
BUDGET
BUDGET ----
REVISED
----
DEPT
BUDGET --
ESTIMATEPROPOSED
REQUEST
BUDGET
PERSONAL SERVICES
COMKODITIES28,645
280776
31,302
SERVICES AND CHARGES
CAPITAL OUTLAY
2 990
523
3,854
X523
3,854
32,775
482
32,775482
482
0
3 406
406
TOTAL
31 990
oaa
33,022
:aas3saaaa
_-----__0
ssa3�ax6as
--------0
36 ,663
------0
36 663
=ovc-voe=
=v.oaoveo
NOTE: SEE ADMINISTRATIVE RECEIPT
SUMMARY FOR DETAILED RECEIPTS
'J
I�
t-
:1
Fr E�
!
j
►.� 1
72
)r•• CITY OF IOWA CITY
j FY88 OPERATING BUDGET
G' EXPENDITURES
11600 CIVIL RIGHTS
PERSONAL SERVICES:
FTE BUDGET NONE
FY87 FY88 $
CIVIL RIGHTS SPECIALIST 1.00 1.00 25,667
BENEFITS 7,108
TOTAL 1.00 1.00 32,775
' saann ax=aaaavn
of
;
TRANSFER TO: f
_0 j
i
TOTAL
R j
INTRA -CITY CHARGEBACES:
VEHICLE OPERATIONS
100
VEHICLE REPLACEMENT
0
WORD PROCESSING
0
OVERHEAD
0
CBDIMAINTENANC
TOTAL
ns�na�ssa
CAPITAL OUTLAY:
NONE
0
R
TOTAL
0
73
i�
l<3
-�
NOTE: SEE ADMINISTRATIVE RECEIPT SUMMARY FOR DETAILED RECEIPTS
IE
CITY OF IOWA CITY
w
FY88 OPERATING BUDGET
i
RECEIPTS AND EXPENDITURES SUMMARY
Cry
11900 NONOPERATIONAL ADMINISTRATION
I
J
EXPENDITURES:
-- FY87 BUDGET ----
---- FY88
BUDGET ----
FY86 ADOPTED REVISED
DEPT
PROPOSED
ACTUAL BUDGET ESTIMATE
REQUEST
BUDGET
SERVICES AND CHARGES
0 0 0
0
125,883
CAPITAL OUTLAY
0 0 0
0
40,000
-,-
`
TRANSFERS OUT
976,232 802,201 817,524
0
1,005,970
CONTINGENCY
0 --------0 199,155
--------0
120,000
TOTAL
976,232 802,201 1,016,679
0
1,291,853
r
aaaaaaaxx axasaszsa aaaasasmx
- xxxxxxxa
xaasvas�
I l
T
NOTE: SEE ADMINISTRATIVE RECEIPT SUMMARY FOR DETAILED RECEIPTS
IE
M
w
i
+FI
Cry
74
CITY OF IOWA CITY
FY88
p
EXPENDINTURES�ET
11900 NON—OPERATIONAL ADMINISTRATION
TRANSFER TO:
PERSONAL SERVICES:
BUDGET
JCCOG — IOWA CITY'S PORTION
320;000
1 1
el
FTE ______
—��
TRANSIT SUBSIDY
511,793
.A
$
TRANSIT LEVY
AIRPORT SUBSIDY
103_113
___
i
FY87 FY88
TOTAL1,005,9
sarwa=sa
I
-__70
TOTAL .00 .00 --------0
aaaaa ansa: sa=aaaaaa
'
'
{
i
INTRACITY CHARGEBACKS:
VEHICLE OPERATIONS
0
0
VEHICLE REPLACEMENT
ADMINISTRATIVE
_
WORD PROCESSING
OVERHEAD
0
0
I
CBD MAINTENANCE
—
I
TOTAL
0
aveva=aav
—
CAPITAL OUTLAY:
.I
COMPUTER CONTINGENCY FUNDS
20,000
��
MICRO—COMPUTER FUNDS
___
TOTAL
-
40,000
E.
i
I
75
CITY OF IOWA CITY
FY88 OPERATING BUDGET
RECEIPTSAND
PDDIISSUMMARY
.. AMNNTRAI
i
EXPENDITURES: -- FY87
BUDGET ----
---- FY88
BUDGET ----
PBUDGET
BUUDGET
ESTIMATE
REQUEST
6 651
X220
AFCTUAL
I��
COMMODITIES
GES
037 80 524
94,391
98,541
98'526
76
ai
PERSONAL SERVICES
71 370
1;578
2,435
3,251
6,220
6 651
X220
,.
COMMODITIES
GES
4 531
5'235
5,908
CAPITAL OUUTTLAY
_4_;578_
_
103_,6_10
107,858
TOTAL
88_,516
C
_88,2_13
�1 C____
i 23
__108,466
'.
RECEIPTS:
FY87
FY88
ACTUAL
ESTIMATE
PBUDGET
i
PROPERTY TAX
88,516
103,610
--107_858
TOTAL
88,516
_107,858
--103,610
76
ai
TOTAL
TRANSFER TO:
TOTAL 75 2.75 98,541 INTRA -CITY CHARGEBACES:
2.
X2.75 s2.75 as:m===a VEHICLE OPERATIONS
0
VEHICLE REPLACEMENT 50
WORD PROCESSING 0
ADMINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD 0
CBD MAINTENANCE 0
0
TOTAL 50
CAPITAL OUTLAY:
DRAFTING STOOL 220
TOTAL ---_--220
* Technical Assistant:
CITY OF IOWA CITY
of FTE is shown here;
FY88
OPERATING BUDGET
JCCOG Rural Planning.
EXPENDITURES
** Admin. Sec. - PPD:
12110 P.P.D.
of FTE is shown here;
ADMINISTRATION
PERSONAL
SERVICES:
JCCOG Rural Planning and
CDBG Metro
Entitlement.
FTE
BUDGET NONE
of FTE is shown here;
FY87
FY88
$
* TECHNICAL ASSISTANT PPD
.60
.60
11,802
GRAPHICS TECHNICIAN
** ADMIN. SEC. - PPD
1;55
1;55
221,901
2 104
*** P.P.D. DIRECTOR
60
.60
26;270
TEMPORARIES
BENEFITS
6153
TOTAL
TRANSFER TO:
TOTAL 75 2.75 98,541 INTRA -CITY CHARGEBACES:
2.
X2.75 s2.75 as:m===a VEHICLE OPERATIONS
0
VEHICLE REPLACEMENT 50
WORD PROCESSING 0
ADMINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD 0
CBD MAINTENANCE 0
0
TOTAL 50
CAPITAL OUTLAY:
DRAFTING STOOL 220
TOTAL ---_--220
* Technical Assistant:
60%
of FTE is shown here;
remainder funded in JCCOG Admin. and
JCCOG Rural Planning.
** Admin. Sec. - PPD:
55%
of FTE is shown here;
remainder is
funded in JCCOG Admin.,
JCCOG Rural Planning and
CDBG Metro
Entitlement.
***PPD Director:
60%
of FTE is shown here;
remainder is
funded in JCCOG Admin.
and
CDBG Metro Entitlement.
77
(p3
RECEIPTS:
CITY OF IOWA CITY
FY88 OPERATING BUDGET
RECEIPTS AND EXPENDITURES SUMMARY
ESTIMATE
i
12120 URBAN PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
ACTUAL
EXPENDITURES:
J
_
-- FY87
ACTUAL ADOPTED
BUDGET --
ESTIMATE
-- FY88
BUDGET ----
PBUDDGGETD
J
BUILDING & DEVELOPMENT F
TOTAL
_--16,625
---18,000
REQUEST
PERSONAL SERVICES
COMMODITIES
139,590 159,778
1 792 1,988
144 115
r
121,992
121,992
SERVICES AND CHARGES
CAPITAL OUTLAY
331587
1420 211220
1,988
21,268
2,048
22:765
1,679
21,101
220765
TOTAL
175,389 183,254
saassa�.3a asaaia�aa
167,591
aaaaaa!♦aa
147,695
145,537
J
aa_aaRaia
as�ssasas
RECEIPTS:
M
V
ESTIMATE
PBUDDGGETD
ACTUAL
J
PROPERTY TAX
CHARGES FOR SERVICES
157,862
148,695
126,641
BUILDING & DEVELOPMENT F
TOTAL
_--16,625
---18,000
-------
175,389
167,591
145,537
M
V
CITY OF IOWA CITY
FY88 OPERATING BUDGET
EXPENDITURES
12120 URBAN PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
PERSONAL SERVICES:
FTE BUDGET NONE
FY87 FY88 $
*ASSOCIATE PLANNER 2.50 2.50 66,661
SENIOR PLANNER 1.00 1.00 31,429
BENEFITS 23,902
TOTAL 3.50 3.50 121,992
* Assocaite Planner:
TRANSFER TO:
TOTAL
INTRA -CITY
VEHICLE OPERATIONS
VEHICLE REPLACEMENT
WORD PROCESSING
CBDIlMAAINTENIANCCOVERHEAD
TOTAL
CAPITAL OUTLAY:
TASK CHAIR-ASSOC. PLANNER
CREDENZA -SR. PLANNER
TOTAL
Three Planners funded but only 50% of one FTE Planner i
here; remainder funded in CDBG Metro Entitlement.
79
CY OF IOWA CITY
FYIT88 OPERATING BUDGET
RECEIPTSIAAND0ENGINEERING SUNI4ARY
EXPENDITURES:
PERSONAL SERVICES
COMMODITIES
CAPITIAL ODUTTLAAND Y GES
TOTAL
RECEIPTS:
PROPERTY TAX
LICENSES 4 PERMITS
CHARGES FOR SERVICES
TOTAL
FY86
-- FY87
ADOPTED
BUDGET ----
REVISED
-- FY88
DEPT
BUDGET ---
PROPOSED
BUDGET
FY8AL 6
ACTU—
BUDGET
ESTIMATE
REQUEST
121]
205,506
336,935
338,454
356,624
354'365
4,355
22_556
4,715
21 629
21;629
4.200
27,624
6:965
25;067
1 440
--
----1=200
—_—
368,998
---
396,128
__—__�_—_
3r-49-
232x932
364 479
r—..
..>.......
.=.>s:..
FY86
FY87
REVISED
FY88
PROPOSED
BUDGET
ANAL
ESTIMATE
231,859
367,898
386'500
121]
1'100
100
_
232,932
368,998
_387, __496
V
v
TOTAL
CITY
OF IOWA
CITY
FY88
OPERATING BUDGET
1'I I
EXPENDITURES
12200
ENGINEERING
PERSONAL SERVICES:
0
---------
ri
I
FTE
BUDGET
FY87
FY88
$
1.00
1:00
21,206
OFFIC 1.00
1.00
26,083
NGINEERING 1.00
1.00
26,083
TOR II 1.00
1.00
22,459
SPECTOR 1.00
1.00
26,936
H' SURVE
0
51;778
2.00
2.00
1.00
1.00
34,715
1.00
1.00
40,768
seoeo==sa
5,000
CAPITAL OUTLAY:
5,000
SIDEWALK/DRIVEWAY REPAIRS
-
69,660
i-07-0-0
10.00
356,624
TOTAL
_ ---1,240
1,440
C
81
1'I I
TRANSFER TO:
.r 1
NONE
0
---------
ri
I
TOTAL
0
--_-
' 1
INTRA -CITY CHARGEBACKS:
- I
VEHICLE OPERATIONS
5,649
4,1950
VEHICLE REPLACEMENT
-
WORD PROCESSING
0
ADMINISTRATIVE
BDIMAIN ENANCOVERHEAD
0
TOTAL
9,844
'I
seoeo==sa
-.
I
CAPITAL OUTLAY:
!
SIDEWALK/DRIVEWAY REPAIRS
EXECUTIVE CHAIR
si!
TOTAL
_ ---1,240
1,440
C
82
FYBBYOPERATINGCBUDGET
RECEIPTS AND EXPENDITURES SUMMARY
12300 PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION
EXPENDITURES:
I _
i
FY86
ACTUAL
---- PY87
ADOPTED
BUDGET
BUDGET ----
REVISED
---- FY88
DEPT
BUDGET ----
PROPOSED
ESTIMATE
REQUEST
BUDGET
_
PERSONAL SERVICES
COMMODITIES
73,372
78,892
BO 259
X498
84
J
SERVICES AND CHARGES
CAPITAL OUTLAY
2 504
;579
4-___
498
3'3490
3,349
699
3,917
84,540
3,782
I
TOTAL
80 807
-_�_�---0
82,739
�--�-�-�0
=�8_4;50=6
0
89,156
0
89,021
RECEIPTS:
FY86
REVISED
PROPOSED
i
ACTUAL
ESTIMATE
BUDGET
PROPERTY TAX
CHARGES FOR SERVICES
32,943
0
32,350
32535
ADMIN EXPENSE CHARGEBACK 47,861
MISCELLANEOUS
51,751
,
53,821
-_-_ _ 3
0
0
TOTAL
80,807
_--- --
-
89,021
-_-84_106
_
82
mi
CITY OF IOWA CITY
FY88 OPERATING BUDGET
EXPENDITURES
12300 PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION
PERSONAL SERVICES:
TRANSFER TO:
FTE BUDGET
NONE
0
FY87 FY88 $
TOTAL 0
ADMIN. SEC.
PUBLIC WORKS 1.00 1.00 21,445
PUBLIC WORKS
DIRECTOR 1.00 1.00 46:509
TEMPORARIES
600
BENEFITS
15,986
-i-.;O- -2-50-
TOTAL
INTRA -CITY CHARGERACKS:
VEHICLE OPERATIONS
100
VEHICLE REPLACEMENT
0
WORD PROCESSING
0
ADMINISTRATIVE
OVERHEAD
0
CBD MAINTENANCE
0
TOTAL
100
CAPITAL OUTLAY:
NONE
0
TOTAL
83
CITY OF IOWA CITY
^, FY88 OPERATING BUDGET
RECEIPTS AND EXPENDITURES SUMMARY
12400 C.B.D. MAINTENANCE
84
,
BUDGET ----
---- FY88
BUDGET ----
EXPENDITURES:
ADOPTED
I
DEPT
PROPOSED
ACTUAL
BUDGET
ESTIMATE
REQUEST
PERSONAL SERVICES
39,983
42,435
42,934
COMMODITIES
45,902
3,007
4,614
SERVICES AND CHARGES
5,540
5,540
11,150
CAPITAL OUTLhY
10,232
12,314
TOTAL
3,120
4,570
4,570
4,870
1
57,260
61,851
62,350
68,743
81,813
rias....
„- RECEIPTS:
asaaaaaaa
�I
J
PROPERTY TAX
r
MISCESLLANEOUSRMITB
FY87
FY88
TOTAL
FY86
REVISED
PROPOSED
j I
IJ
ESTIMATE
BUDGET
53,041
58,131
77,594
2,600
i
2,600
i
84
---- FY87
BUDGET ----
---- FY88
BUDGET ----
FY86
ADOPTED
REVISED
DEPT
PROPOSED
ACTUAL
BUDGET
ESTIMATE
REQUEST
BUDGET
39,983
42,435
42,934
46,019
45,902
3,007
4,614
4,614
5,540
5,540
11,150
10,232
10,232
12,314
12,464
3,120
4,570
4,570
4,870
17,907
57,260
61,851
62,350
68,743
81,813
rias....
aasaaa ..
asaaaaaaa
aaasaaaaa
aaaaaaav
r
FY87
FY88
FY86
REVISED
PROPOSED
ACTUAL
ESTIMATE
BUDGET
53,041
58,131
77,594
2,600
2,600
2,600
i
_ 1,619
1,619
1,619
57,260
62,350
81,813
a=aaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaa
----- --
i
84
M -W -III - CBD
TEMPORARIES
OVERTIME
BENEFITS
TOTAL
FY88YOPERATINGCBUDGET
12400 CXBED IMAINTENANCE
PERSONAL SERVICES:
FTE BUDGET
FY87 FY88 $
1.00 1.00 21,570
16,468
_ --__ 7_514
-40
1_00 -1_00 451902
85
TRANSFER TO:
NONE 0
TOTAL ----'0
j
INTRA -CITY CHARGEBACES:
VEHICLE REPLACEMENT
ADMINISTRATIVE
CBD MAINTENANCE
TOTAL
CAPITAL OUTLAY:
CBD SURFACE REPAIRS
345 TREES
SHRUSHARED COST
ESL -STEAM FRES USURRE SPRAYER
ESL - LEAF/LITTER VACUUM
TRASH RECEPTACLES
TOTAL
-1
0
_
0
0
0
8,770
I
8,770
1
5,000
2,775
w
4,312
2,300
I
I!l
1,000
21520
7,907
G3
�'
a t RECEIPTS:
ACTUAL
CITITY
FY88YOPERATINGCBUDGET
RECEIPTS
FY88
PROPOSED
BUDGET
J
PROPERTY TAX 12,197
MISCELLANEOUS TRANSFER 3,887
1615930
AND EXPENDITURES SUMMARY
12500 ENERGY CONSERVATION
TOTAL --__
16,08
--
---16 — 5
EXPENDITURES:
FY86 __ -- FY87 BUDGET ----
ADOPTED REVISED
ANAL BUDGET
—_ -- FY88
DEPT
BUDGET ----
ESTIMATE
REQUEST
PROPOSED
BUDGET
PERSONAL SERVICES
COMMODITIES
15 057 14 195
SERVICES AND CHARGES
199 X250 15,180
828 250
16,250
16 322
X250
TOTAL
1 163
--------- ------"— 1 163
-----=---
1,182
16,084 15,608 16 9
4iyi=�Jy
----1_170
17 742
�
_—_17,754
a t RECEIPTS:
V
mi
ACTUAL
FY87
REVISED
ESTIMATE
FY88
PROPOSED
BUDGET
J
PROPERTY TAX 12,197
MISCELLANEOUS TRANSFER 3,887
1615930
17,754
TOTAL --__
16,08
--
---16 — 5
--------0
17,754
V
mi
ENERGY COORDINATOR
BENEFITS.
TOTAL
CITY OF IOWA CITY
FY88 OPERATING BUDGET
EXPITUS
12500 ENERGYDCONSERVATION
PERSONAL SERVICES:
FTE BUDGET NONE
FY87 FY88 $
(PT) .50 .50 13,565
_____ 2_757
50 .50 16,322
vaaav mvvam save__=ve
87
VEHICLE
VEHICLE
WORD PRO
ADNINIS
CBD NAI
NONE
TO
I
TRANSFER TO: .,
0 r
TOTAL _
i -t
rl "
INTRA -CITY CHARGEBACRS:
ORATIONS
50 -
REPLACEMENT
0 -
TRATIVE OVERHEAD 0 j
NTENANCE 0 _
!AL
CAPITAL OUTLAY:
0
TOTAL --------p 8�
v
FY88YOPERATINGCBUDGET
RECEIPTS AND EXPENDITURES SUMMARY
14100 TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
EXPENDITURES:
RECEIPTS:
FY86 REVISED PROPOSED
ACTUAL ESTIMATE
-- FY87
BUDGET
BUDGET --
-- FY88
BUDGET ----
ACTUAL
ESTIMATE
REQUEST
PBUDDGGETD
PERSONAL SERVICES
C0IMODITIES
224,677
51 013
243,24838
237,534
249,620
249,620
SERVICES AND CHARGES
CAPITAL OUTLAY
334,971
814170
335300
49,248
335,300
49,431
341 956
50,431
323,343
TRANSFERS -OUT
J
14,9805
22,6303
10,5000
3,5000
--
TOTAL
619,078
644,715
_-----500
627,094
TOTAL
078 619
619,078
=-632_616
=-644,715
651,507
627,094
RECEIPTS:
FY86 REVISED PROPOSED
ACTUAL ESTIMATE
IJ
88
K,
-I
I=
BUDGET
J
PROPERTY TAX
CHARGES FOR SERVICES
71,663
4,914
,
85 000
-392
1
ROAD USE TAX
MISCELLANEOUS
542,036
465
558,500
621,986
J
TOTAL
619,078
644,715
_-----500
627,094
IJ
88
K,
-I
I=
CITY OF IOWA CITY
FY88 OPERATING BUDGET
EXPENDITURES
14100 TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
PERSONAL SERVICES:
FTE BUDGET NONE
FY87 FY88 $
M.W.II-- TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
1.00
1.00
19,449
M.W.II - TRAFFIC ENG. SIGNS
1.00
1.00
18,949
SR.ENGINEER.TECH.-TRAFFIC ENG
1.00
1.00
26,062
M. -III - TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
ELECTRICIAN
1.00
1.00
22,381
TRRA FICNENGINEECR IQIAN
2.00
2.00
45,524
1.00
1.00
35,443
OVERTIME
5,670
BENEFITS
_
51,099
TOTAL
8.00
8.00
249,620
89
TRANSFER TO:
0
TOTAL
INTRA -CITY CHARGEBACRS:
VEHICLE OPERATIONS 11,016
VEHICLE REPLACEMENT 16,890
WORD PROCESSING 0
ADMINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD 0
CBD MAINTENANCE 0
TOTAL 27,906
CAPITAL OUTLAY:
SIGNAL PARTS 3,500
TOTAL 3,500
G3
PERSONAL SERVICES
COMMODITIES
SERVICES AND CHARGES
CAPITAL OUTLAY
TRANSFERS OUT
TOTAL
i J CHARRGESYFOR SERVICES
ROAD USE TAX
JMISCELLANEOUS
TOTAL
FY88YOPERATINGCBUDGET
81430SEEESYSTE�Y0TTM MAINTENANCE
ACTUAL
- -- FY87
ADOPTED
BUDGET
BUDGET ----
REVISED
---- FY88
DEPT
BUDGET ----
PROPOSED
182,024
29518r
ESTIMATE
REQUEST
BUDGET
175,869
233 572
1000
514,147
366;580
548,631
364;519
541,911
212;574
20 r
00,000
319 000
r
359;342
260,0000
_---0
1,275,812
...as.a..
p
1,310,7881,314,299
...a.....
0
.....a...
0
1,501,998
1,398,241
.......y
FY86
ACTUAL
FY87
ESTIMATE
FY88
PBUDDGGET
182,024
29518r
7,531
6,887
,0913
1,303;
1041,
1,388,50
250
250
1,275,812
1,314,299
1,398,241
90
V
e
* Street/ Sanitation Supt.:
CAPITAL OUTLAY:
ASPHALT,OVERLAY
2 METAL BOXES FOR TRUCKS
TOTAL
� I
210:000
r
I
--260,000
EI "
1;
�
CITY OF IOWA CITY
u
FY88 OPERATING BUDGET
{
EXPENDITURES
v
14300 STREET SYSTEM MAINTENANCE
PERSONAL
SERVICES:
TRANSFER T0:
i !
I
FTE BUDGET
NONE
FY87 FY88 $
TOTAL
�
M -W -I - STREETS
M -W -II - STREETS
5.00 5.00 88,212
SR.CLERK TYPIST - STREETS
M
4.00 4.00 77,969
1.00 1.00 19,448
-W -III - STREETS
SR. M.W. — STREETS
5.00 5.00 112,262
2.00 2.00 45,294
*ASST.
SSAANNITATIOONNESUPT
1.00 1.00 29,682
-
gT
OVERTIMEIES
.50 .50 17,530
INTRA -CITY CHARGEBACKS:
BENEFITS
26,933
111_137
VEHICLE OPERATIONS
VEHICLE REPLACEMENT
163,974
TOTAL
_ _ --- ---'- ---
18_5 18_50
WORD PROCESSING
ADMINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD
131,089
p
1
--541,911
-----___=
CBD MAINTENANCE
p
0
TOTAL
295,063
_ a
* Street/ Sanitation Supt.:
CAPITAL OUTLAY:
ASPHALT,OVERLAY
2 METAL BOXES FOR TRUCKS
TOTAL
50% of FTE is shown here; remainder funded in Refuse Collection
and Landfill Operations.
91
lb
� I
210:000
r
I
--260,000
EI "
1;
50% of FTE is shown here; remainder funded in Refuse Collection
and Landfill Operations.
91
lb
FY88 YOPERITINGCBUDGET
RECEIPTS AND EXPENDITURES SUMMARY
15100 FORESTRY/HORTICULTURE
JI EXPENDITURES;
ACTUAI FY87 BUDGET
ADOPTED -- DE FY88 BUDGET ----
J REVISED
BUDGET ESTIMATE REQUEST PROPOSED
PERSONAL SERVICES BUDGET
COMMODITIES 61,474 67 961
SERVICES AND CHARGES 3,354 31603 68,934 76,497 74,762
J CAPITAL OUTLAY 41,010 44 501 3,603 3,583
14_080 44,501 42 g3 3,583
TOTAL _-_ _ _ 15_500 15_500 12 560 38,436
119,918 — --- —2-560 ----7-685
moxaacasa xamva=5 x5 aassaiaaa a 135,Saa a 124,466
aaaaaaaa
RECEIPTS:
FY FY87 FY88
ACTUAL REVISED PRBUDGET d ESTIMATE
'7 PROPERTY TAXMISCBLLANEOU117
S 21063 855 131,238 123,166
TOTAL ----2 ----11300 -11300
aa1va9vx9av 132,538 ---124,466
� a.--xxaxa aaaaxaaam
92
_i
i
P
.��
v
CITY OF IOWA CITY
FY88 OPERATING BUDGET
_
15100 FORESTRY/HORTICULTURE
PERSONAL
SERVICES:
TRANSFER T0:
FTEBUDGET
NONE
p
FY87 FY88 $
TOTAL
-------
p
77
M.W. II - FORESTRY
FORESTER/HORTICULTURIST
1.00 1.00 18,949
1.00 1.00 27,539
;-
TEMPORARIES
15 0
i
BENEFITS.
12,737
)
TOTAL
__ _ _____
2_00 2.00 74,762
INTRA -CITY CHARGEBACKS:
j
VEHICLE OPERATIONS
4 682
,
ti
VEHICLE REPLACEMENT
5,141
WORD PROCESSING
_
ADMINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD
0
CBD MAINTENANCE
0
I
TOTAL
9,823
CAPITAL OUTLAY:
100 NURSERY TREES
1,850
ESL -ELECTRONIC SHIGOMETER
d
70 TREES, SHARED COST
5_355
TOTAL
----i�
7,685
@7
93
,
-1
CITY OF IOWA CITY
RECEIPT FY88 OPERATING BUDGET
S AND EXPENDITURES SUMMARY
15200 CEMETERY
i
EXPENDITURES:
FY86
ACTUAL
- DO FY87
ADO
ADOPTED
BUDGET ----
REVISED
---- PY88
DEPT
BUDGET ----
BUDGET
ESTIMATE
REQUEST
PROPOSED
BUDGET
PERSONAL SERVICES
COMMODITIES
SERVICES AND CHARGES
93 356
5 043
98,333
7.333
100,059
7,333
104,495
104,495
J
TRANSFERS OUTATY
19 248
2,151
11,300
12,000
7,194
23,050
7,063
TOTS
0
-___-___0
0
0
10;050
0
119,798
aaamaaaaa
126,445
.mama....
128,998
avama�ya
134,850
141,722
� ..
aaaaaoama
oasoawa
I�
,RECEIPTS:
_
FY86
ACTUAL
REVISED
ESTIMATE
PROPOSED
BUDGET
PROPERTY TAX
LIBRARY SERVICES i CONTR
72 050
47,748
36,221
43 861
TOTAL
_
119,798
128,998
141,722
aam3vaoaa
avaavaaav
ama-aeamm
F
d
fi
-I 1
94
-1
�1J
;
G
CITY
OF IOWA CITY
FY88
OPERATING BUDGET
!�
EXPENDITURES
15200 CEMETERY
PERSONAL
SERVICES:
TRANSFER T0:
FTE BUDGET
NONE
0
FY87
FY88 $
TOTAL
--------0
M.N.II - CEMETERY
M.W.III - CEMETERY
1.00
1.00 18,761
CEMETERY
SR• TEMPORARIES
OEVER
1.00
1.00
1.00 21,570
1.00 27,810
IIMEIES
14,982
BENEFITS
20, 553
I
TOTAL
____
3.00
----- _
3.00 104,495
INTRACITY CHARGEBACKS:
�^
VEHICLE OPERATIONS
VEHICLE REPLACEMENT
5,206
_ j
ADMINISTRATIVE
7,798
0
OVERHEAD
0
CBD MAINTENANCE
0
TOTAL
13,004
CAPITAL OUTLAY:
I
Mi j
ASPHALT OVERLAY
8 REPLACEMENT TREES
2,050
ESL -TURF TRUCKSTER W/ DUMP
BACK -PACK LEAF BLOWER
600
7,000
!� f
400
TOTAL10,
050
95
G3
�l
ji
-1
CITY OF IOWA CITY
FY88 OPERATING BUDGET
RECEIPTS AND EXPENDITURES SUMMARY
13110 POLICE ADMINISTRATION
EXPENDITURES:
RECEIPTS:
---- FY87
BUDGET ----
---- FY88
BUDGET ----
FY86
ADOPTED
REVISED
DEPT
PROPOSED
ACTUAL
BUDGET
ESTIMATE
REQUEST
BUDGET
i
PERSONAL SERVICES
122,387*
119,353
137,611
127,159
143,373
COMMODITIES
555
675
675
1,875
625
SERVICES AND CHARGES
36,321
16,714
16,714
32,337
19,667
CAPITAL OUTLAY
0
0
625
7,135
4,335
TOTAL
159,263
saaaaaasa
136,742
sasasasaa
155,625
aaaasasaa
168,506
ssamsaasa
168,000
aasaasaaa
RECEIPTS:
hi
FY86
REVISED
PROPOSED
ACTUAL
ESTIMATE
BUDGET
PROPERTY TAX
157,838
139,053
150,919
SERVICES
POLICE SERVICES
1,425
867
867
**POLICE
16214
TOTAL
--�_----0
159,263
155,625
---------
168,000
---15,705
Il------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* In FY86, the pension and retirement costs
were paid directly
from the Trust & Agency Fund; a total
of $15,004.
**Transfer of property taxes
levied under Trust & Agency
to fund the Pension d& Retirement costs,
96
�.✓YHYiii
riiv p!'Mi^ f�..::v � i '..'::,fir -,,:=
.:;; q .. ;.
�..
, �le-,...f:
CITY OF IOWA CITY
FY88 OPERATING BUDGET
EXPENDITURES
13110 POLICE ADMINISTRATION
PERSONAL SERVICES: TRANSFER TO:
FTE BUDGET NONE
TOTAL
FY87 FY88 $
ADMIN. SEC. - RECORDS SUPR.
1.00
1.00
23,587
DEPUTY POLICE CHIEF
1.00
1.00
38,085
POLICE CHIEF
1.00
1.00
51,771
BENEFITS
0
29,930
_ TOTAL
3.00
3.00
143 373
0
0
VEHICLE REPLACEMENT
0
i
amass= ..... iaaaefoaa INTRA -CITY CHARGEBACKS: �!
VEHICLE OPERATIONS
0
VEHICLE REPLACEMENT
0
WORD PROCESSING
0
OVERHEAD
0
CBDIMAINTTEENANC
TOTAL
0
CAPITAL OUTLAY:
rI
I
COMPUTER WORK STATION -SEC.
685
DOOR ALERTING i LOCK DEVICE
450
DOOR MONITORING CAMERAS
2,500
$
3 GUEST CHAIRS -CHIEF
300
2 TWO -DRAWER FILE CABINETS
400
TOTAL
_ CITY OF IOWA CITY
FY88 OPERATING BUDGET
RECEIPTS ANDS EX120 PENDITURES SUMMARY
1PATROL
99
EXPENDITURES:
____ FY87
ADOPTED
BUDGET ----
REVISED
---- FY88
DEPT
BUDGET ----
PROPOSED
FY86
ACTUAL
BUDGET
ESTIMATE
REQUEST
BUDGET
PERSONAL SERVICES
1 327 445*
1,319,942
84,546
1,564,664
84,546
1,463,063
81,124
1,69D,137
74,124
81,601
j
COMMODITIES
SERVICES AND CHARGES
67484
p:808
43 435
64_595
43,435
64_595
80,648
235_942
93,220
f
CAPITAL OUTLAY
-- _____
1,524,882
_____ ___
1,512,518
1,757,240
1,860,777
1,860,77=
1,939,082
=,939,888
:.i.
TOTAL
180110811
esssasase
,7m8,sasa
RECEIPTS:
FY86
FY87
REVISED
FY88
PROPOSED
ACTUAL
ESTIMATE
BUDGET
'
PROPERTY TAX
1,409,563
1,424,355
1,592,913
13,825
POLICE SERVICES
MOTEL TAX
105,271
105;270
213,790
105;270
227_074
**PROPERTY TAX TRANSFER
0
1,757,240
939 082
1, r
TOTAL
1,524,882
1
J
-------------------
directly from the
-------------------
Trust & Agency Fund; a total
* In FY86, the pension and
retirement costs
were paid
of $210,121.
levied under
Trust & Agency to fund the
Pension & Retirement costs.
**Transfer of property taxes
99
CITY OF IOWA CITY
FY88
OPERATING BUDGET
;
EXPENDITURES
..
.+
13120 PATROL
PERSONAL
SERVICES:
TRANSFER TO:
FTE BUDGET
NONE
p
FY87
FY88 $
TOTAL
p
POLICE OFFICER
POLICE SERGEANT
37.00
37.00 989,042
POLICE CAPTAIN
6.00
2.00
6.00 197,267
2.00 70,824
OVERTIME
BENEFITS
50,000
I
SPECIAL BEN. (POLICE 6 FIRE)
378,804
4;200
TOTAL
____
45.00
____
45.00 1,690,137
INTRA -CITY CHARGEBACKS:
_
•_
VEHICLE OPERATIONS
98,869
j
VEHICLE REPLACEMENT
O
WORD PROCESSING
p
ADMINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD
0
CBD MAINTENANCE
p
-..
TOTAL
98,869
CAPITAL OUTLAY:
M
10 NON -STRETCHABLE TAPES
200
3 MEASURING WHEELS
420
7 SQUAD CARS
70,750
14 VEHICLE SHOTGUN RACKS
8
REPLACE 2 RIFLES
X900
15 HELMETS
1,050
10 BULLET PROOF VESTS
2,950
8 SHIELDS
1,250
BODY
1,200
30 XEL LIGHTS
3,750
2 RADAR UNITS
ESL -5 SHOTGUNS
2,600
ESL:4-PART EVIDENCE LOCKER
1400
ESL:4-PART GUN LOCKER
SHOOTING RANGE EQUIPMENT
5,000
TOTAL
---
93,220
99
100
4
PY88TOPERATING BUDGET
I
RECEIPTS AND EXPENDITURES SUMMARY
13130 CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION
J
EXPENDITURES:
-- FY87 BUDGET ----
FY86 ADOPTED REVISED
-- FY88
DEPT
BUDGET ----
ACTUAL BUDGET
ESTIMATE
REQUEST
PROPOSED
BUDGET
PERSONAL SERVICES
COMMODITIES
160,075*
1,752 192,050
222,050
193x102
230,430
SERVICES AND CHARGES
CAPITAL OUTLAY
5,975
8_990
5,771
5,989
5x989
__ 15x320
-- i
19 3_20
r
27,600
r
10,000
TOTAL
@T-6,7� 222,112
�aau
250,339
uaa+a>•u
236,344
_
249,521
aaauasaa
aauauu
RECEIPTS:
FY86 REVISED
PROPOSED
ACTUAL ESTIMATE
BUDGET
PROPERTY TAX
**PROPERTY TAX TRANSFER
176 792 213,419
218,744
0 30_920
30,777
i
TOTAL
__ _ _ _
—.176,792 244,339
249,521
cv.aaaaaa aaaaaaaaa aaaaaaasa
J*
In FY86, the pension and
of $28,479.
_______________________________________________________________
retirment costs were paid directly
from the Trust & Agency
Fund; a total
**Transfer of property taxes levied under Trust & Agency to
fund the Pension
& Retirement costs.
100
4
CITY OF IOWA CITY
FY88 OPERATING BUDGET
EXPENDITURES
13130 CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION
PERSONAL
SERVICES:
TRANSFER TO:
FTE BUDGET
--- ------
NONE
0
TOTAL
0 ---------
FY87 FY88 $ij
POLICE OFFICER
5.00 500 137,384
POLICESERGEANT1.00
1:00 33:072
OVERTIME
4,000
BENEFITS
52:374
SPECIAL BEN. (POLICE FIRE)
3,600
TOTAL
6.00 6.00 230,430
INTRA -CITY CHARGEBACKS:
VEHICLE OPERATIONS
0
VEHICLE REPLACEMENT
0
WORD PROCESSING
0
ADMINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD
0
CBD MAINTENANCE
0
TOTAL
0
CAPITAL OUTLAY -
1 UNMARKED UNIT
10,000
TOTAL10,000
101
EXPENDITURES:
J
PERSONAL SERVICES
COMMODITIES
SERVICES AND CHARGES
CAPITAL OUTLAY
mj TOTAL
i RECEIPTS:
PROPERTY TAX
POLICE SERVICES
TOTAL
-'t
J
U
rYY1�1' ,
FY88YOPERATINGCBUDGET
11140SRECORDSPQNIDEN�TIFICA�NY
F786
ACTUAL
-- FY87
ADOPTED
BUDGET
BUDGET ----
REVISED
-- FYBS
DEPT
BUDGET ----
BUDGET
239,287
2,681
ESTIMATEREQUEST
289,771
PROPOSED
BUDGET
198,028
2,662
41_063
225;505
222 1
1504
238 .863
235 36
-
42,665
21,467
22_108
26.583
5;758
241,968
'mmaama
------ _0
'CON,
269 721
_
299_8_65_
-- -
__ 26508
=
m�
a27la±a4
572,535
amcaacaa.
292,150aamao
aa
FY86
ACTUAL
FY87
REVISED
FY88
PROPOSED
BUDGET
239,287
2,681
268,845
2,379
289,771
_-
2,379
241,968
asaaaaamm
271,224
mcvssaaaa
292,150
caaaamasa
102
V
ml
j
:ter„
1
TOTAL
-I
TRANSFER TO:
__ _ ___ 49,906 INTRACITY CHARGEBACKS:
TOTAL 9.50 9.50 -63 VEHICLE OPERATIONS
235,3363 VEHICLE REPLACEMENT 0
WORD PROCESSING 0
ADMINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD 0
0
0
103
TOTAL
0
axa:aaaaa
CAPITAL OUTLAy:
3000MPUTER2WORKSTATIONNS 22,108
ESL- SHELVING FOR JAIL CELL 1,370
ESL -STORAGE FOR LOST FOUND 1,600
ESL -CABINET AT FRO ST
400
3 TASK CHAIRS
__ 630
_
TOTAL 26,508
(o3
0
PY88YOPERATINGCBUDGET
13140
RECORDSN&I IDENTIFICATION
PERSONAL SERVICES:
FTE
BUDGET NONE
FY87
FY88
$
CLERK TYPIST - POLICE RECORDS
//
SRLCLERKETYPIST-POLICE RECORD
POLICE
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
35,807
38,896
DISPATCHER
SR RADIO DISPATCHER -POLICE
POLICE
1.00
3.00
1.00
3.00
19,926
58,805
DESK CLERK
OVERTIME (PT)
1.00
50
1.00
22,901
BENEFITS
.50
8,522
TOTAL
-I
TRANSFER TO:
__ _ ___ 49,906 INTRACITY CHARGEBACKS:
TOTAL 9.50 9.50 -63 VEHICLE OPERATIONS
235,3363 VEHICLE REPLACEMENT 0
WORD PROCESSING 0
ADMINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD 0
0
0
103
TOTAL
0
axa:aaaaa
CAPITAL OUTLAy:
3000MPUTER2WORKSTATIONNS 22,108
ESL- SHELVING FOR JAIL CELL 1,370
ESL -STORAGE FOR LOST FOUND 1,600
ESL -CABINET AT FRO ST
400
3 TASK CHAIRS
__ 630
_
TOTAL 26,508
(o3
0
CITY OF IOWA CITY V
FY88 OPERATING BUDGET
RECEIPTS AND EXPENDITURES SUMMARY
13150 SCHOOL SAFETY & EMERGENCY OPER
EXPENDITURES:
---- FY87
BUDGET ----
__ -- FY88
BUDGET ----
I
REVISED
FY86
ADOPTED
REVISED
DEPT
PROPOSED
BUDGET
-�
ACTUAL
BUDGET
ESTIMATE
REQUEST
BUDGET
TOTAL
PERSONAL SERVICES
26,859
27,336
26,471
350
30,898
350
29,800
250
aaaaaasaa
COMMODITIES
SERVICES AND 'CHARGES
208
2,857
350
2,754
2,754
2,755
2,714
TOTAL
---i9-59-24
30,440
29,575
34,003
32,764
..
asasaassa
s:sassass
soasasass
aaaaaaaaa
aaasaaaaa
iiL'CC1Yl5:
j�
FY86
REVISED
PROPOSED
ACTUAL
ESTIMATE
BUDGET
r!
r, PROPERTY TAX
32_764
TOTAL
---29,924
29,924
---
29,575
-_29,575
32,764
_..
asaasasma
aaaaaasaa
aaaaaass
I
1
J
104
TEMPORARIES
BENEFITS
TOTAL
CITY OF IOWA CITY
FY88 OPERATING BUDGET
EXPENDITURES
13150 SCHOOL SAFETY & EMERGENCY OPER
PERSONAL SERVICES:
FTE BUDGET NONE
FY87 FY88 $
26,352
3,448
00 .00 29,800
s=a== sane aaaaaaaaa
105
VEHICLE
VEHICLE
WORD PRO
ADMINIS
CBD MAIN
1*01!?
TO
i
I
�I
w`
gl
TRANSFER TO: i
i
0
TOTAL --------0 I
i
NTRA-CITY CHARGEBACKS:
OPERATIONS 0
REPLACEMENT 0
CESSING 0
TRATIVE OVERHEAD 0
TENANCE
'AL 0
I
_ I
CAPITAL OUTLAY:
--------° .,
TOTAL 0
x
a
G3 ''
EXPENDITURES:
CITY OF IOWA CITY V
FY88 OPERATING BUDGET
RECEIPTS AND EXPENDITURES SUMMARY
13200 FIRE DEPARTMENT
x«
M
j
FY86
-- FY87 BUDGET ----
ADOPTED REVISED
---- FY88
DEPT
BUDGET ----
PROPOSED
1
ACTUAL
BUDGET
ESTIMATE
REQUEST
BUDGET
PERSONAL SERVICES
1,433,645"
1,458,334
1,852,995
1,550,147
1,952,289
COMMODITIES
31,992
32,378
35 453
451,594
33 190
SERVICES AND CHARGES
55,360
42,996
45:396
68;812
56;268
CAPTRANSFERS OUTLAY
31,7500
00
40,2530
183,731
497,7100
0
TOTAL
1,552,747
1,533,708
1,974,097
1,848,284
2,539,457
I
aaasassss
sasasaaae
assaaasev
oesss=e=e
vscesseva
RECEIPTS:
I
FY86
REVISED
PROPOSED
ACTUAL
ESTIMATE
BUDGET
PROPERTY TAX
1,197,722
1,200,608
1,267,718
CHARGES FOR SERVICES
57
102
99
UNIVERSITY FIRE CONTRACT
354,963
391,001
418,371
FEDERAL REVENUE SHARING
**PROPERTY
0
0
451,517
TAX TRANSFER
0
382,386
401,752
MISCELLANEOUS
5
TOTAL
1,552,747
--------0
1,974,097
--------0
2,539,457
i
l
aaamaaaaa
- -
- -
I I
J
________________________________________________________
t In FY86, the pension and retirement costs
were paid directly from the
Trust & Agency
Fund; a total
j
of 8381,251.
eIa
,
Iti
•'I'ranster of property taxes
levied under Trust
& Agency
to fund the
Pension & Retirement costs.
}
s
106
t
GJ
x«
M
107
CAPITAL OUTLAY:
TOTAL
i
14,305
CITY OF IOWA CITY
4, 000
6,676
FY88 OPERATING BUDGET
3 500
2,000,::
10,972
EXPENDITURES
451,517
13200 FIRE
DEPARTMENT
497,710
PERSONAL
SERVICES:
TRANSFER TO:
FTE
BUDGET
---
NONE
0
FY88
$_-_
TOTAL
0
36.00 36.00
867,981
rT
6.00 6.00
159,870
S CLERK/TYPIST
1.00 1.00
19,843
1.00 1.00
33,634
;F
3.00 3.00
105,910
1.00 1.00
46,925
INTRA -CITY CHARGEBACKS:
10,500
11,000
VEHICLE OPERATIONS
22,606
POLICE & FIRE
581,839
VEHICLE REPLACEMENT
0
WORD PROCESSING
0
TOTAL
_ _ __ __
51_00 51_00
--- -
3;27,775
1,952,269
ADMINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD
CBD MAINTENANCE
0
0
TOTAL
22,606
107
CAPITAL OUTLAY:
TOTAL
i
14,305
i
4, 000
6,676
C
3 500
2,000,::
10,972
451,517
6,610
497,710
108
V
it
FY88 OPERATINGCBUDGET
RECEIPTS AND
i
EXPENDITURES SUMMARY
13300 ANIMAL CONTROL
-
EXPENDITURES:
-- FY87
FY86 ADOPTED
ACTUAL BUDGET
BUDGET ----
REVISED
-_ -- FY88
BUDGET -- --
PROPOSED
ESTIMATEDEPT
REQUEST
BUDGET
PERSONAL SERVICES
COMMODITIES
101 338 105,420
106,544
SERVICES AND CHARGES
CAPITAL OUTLAY
6,271
11 674 ,955
13,901
6 015
113,129
113,129
TOTAL
0
--------- ------933
14;701
------073
26,473
2,525
11 933
13,700
J
119,283
mamammamm maa?aa?as
ax 130,333
-- --- ---
149,055
ssaxssaam
----- ---
, 144,384
144 384
xs
1
I
RECEIPTS:
' I
FY87
FY86 REVISED
ACTUAL ESTIMATE
PROPOSED
BUDGET
-
PROPERTY TAX 88 339
LIBRARY SERVICES i CONTR 30'944 95,801
109,852
TOTAL
-'-30-94- 34,532
---341532
119,283 � 130,333
axaxsaaaa
144,384
-.
msxsmsaam
-
aasss-sxs
108
V
it
FY88YOPERAT IOWA CITY
EXPENDITURES
r 13300 ANIMAL CONTROL
PERSONAL SERVICES:
( TRANSFER TO:
FTE BUDGET NONE
FY87 FY88 $ TOTAL
ANIMAL CONTROL OFFICER
ANIMAL CONTROL SUPERVISOR 3.00 3.00 62,525
OVERTIME 1.00 1.00 27,206
BENEFITS
TOTAL ----- ___2_3_198
4.00 4.00 113,129
INTRA—CITY CHARGEBACKS:
VEHICLE
EE REPLACEMENT
WORD PROCESSING 2,090
ADMINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD 0
CBD MAINTENANCE 0
0
TOTAL 2,099
CAPITAL OUTLAY:
EUTHHAANNASIAC ABLE
TOTAL
109
0
-1
e.l
13,200
500 0
13,700
(I
�1
i CITY OF IOWA CITY
FY88 OPERATING BUDGET
RECEIPTS AND EXPENDITURES SUMMARY
13410 H.I.S. ADMINISTRATION
7
J EXPENDITURES:
I;
J PERSONAL SERVICES
COMMODITIES
I '
CA
PTALLSOUUTTLAYCHARCES
_I TOTAL
wl
A
W RECEIPTS:
w.
HOUSIN YPERRMMITS 6 INSPEC
TOTAL
I
J
h
V
-- FY87
BUDGET ----
---- FY88
BUDGET ----
FY86
ADOPTED
REVISED
DEPT
PROPOSED
ACTUAL
BUDGET
ESTIMATE
REQUEST
BUDGET
I
53,665
73,210
72,400
75,789
75,789
650
830
830
765
890
5,9_5_2
7,670
7,670
1:400
5:900
61,178
81,717
80,907
86,417
90,757 i
vvvvaysaa
coaaasa:v
aaaaaaasz
a�amazsaa
mzzaaaaaa
j
)f.
FY86
REVISED
PROPOSED
ACTUAL
ESTIMATE
BUDGET
E
60x264
8Q 422
90422
vavaava78
aaaaav907 aam
zmazaa90,757
i
110
CITY OF IOWA CITY
FY88 OPERATING BUDGET
EXPENDITURES
13410 H.I.S. ADMINISTRATION
PERSONAL SERVICES:
FTE BUDGET NONE
-- TOTAL
FY87 FY88 $
CODE ENFORCEMENT ASST. 1.00 1.00 20,530
TEMPORARIESCTOR 1.00 1.00 40,200
BENEFITS 14,957
TOTAL 2.00 2.00 75,789
TRANSFER
aaaaa aaaas aaseaaaoa TO:
INTRA—CITY CHARGE
VEHICLE OPERATIONS
VEHICLE REPLACEMENT
WORD PROCESSING
ADMINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD
CBD MAINTENANCE
111
icm)0l0
al
i
'
0
I
i
HACKS:
2000
0
0
0
_ 200
6 a
!
n
I
CAPITAL OUTLAY:
ELECTRONIC TYPEWRITER 11400
MICROFILM READER/PRINTER _ 4,500 c1
TOTAL 5,900 E.1
�y
v
^i
CITY OF IOWA CITY
FY88 OPERATING BUDGET
RECEIPTS AND EXPENDITURES SUMMARY
13420 BUILDING INSPECTION
-
EXPENDITURES:
_ -- FY87 BUDGET
----
__ -- FY88
BUDGET ----
FY86 ADOPTED
ACTUAL BUDGET
REVISED
ESTIMATE
DEPT
REQUEST
PROPOSED
BUDGET
'
J
PERSONAL SERVICES
146,969 155,344
1,616
157,999
1,616
164,711
1,564
164,711
1,564
,
COMMODITIES
SERVICES AND CHARGES
3,362
12'210
17-480
CAPITAL OUTLAY
---14-620
-__17=590
TOTAL,
__-15-320
163,061 172,285
vvvavvvv avaasaaaa
174,237
aaaxvaaaa
183,873
xa � a
183,755
axm�zvuv
i
W
4A
i
�
a
RECEIPTS:
�y
ACTUAL ESTIMATE
PBUDDGGET
I
PROPERTY TAX
BUILDING PERMITS &
22,178 22,267
INSPE 140,883 151_970
32,991
150,764
isaaaasaaa
TOTAL
163,061 174,237
avaaaaaxv
183,755
vaxavasav
1
i .
r
112
�y
FY88YOPERATINGCBUDGET
13420 BUILDINGTINSPECTION
PERSONAL SERVICES:
FTE BUDGET NONE
FY87 FY88 $
SR. BUILDINGPINSPECTOR 4.00 4.00 100,173
TEMPORARIES 1.00 1.00 29,952
BENEFITS
__ _ ____ _ 34,436
TOTAL 5.00 5.00 164,711
TRANSFER TO: -
I
TOTAL --------0
---- INTRA -CITY CHARGEBACRS:
VVEEHICLLEE REPLACEMENT
8,000
ADMINISTRAATIVEGOVERHEAD 0
CBD MAINTENANCE 0
0
TOTAL
8,000 u
M
CAPITAL OUTLAY: "
NONE
0
TOTAL --------- R�
113
�I
G3
CITY OF IOWA CITY
FY88 OPERATING BUDGET V
1
RECEIPTS4USINGEINSPECTTIIOONSSERVVICCES
' J EXPENDITURES:
_ ---- FY87 BUDGET ---- __
AFFY86 ADOPTED REVISED FY88 BUDGET ----
ACTUAL BUDGET ESTIMATE REQUEST PROPOSE
BUDGET
PERSONAL SERVICES 98,715 ;
COMMODITIES X840 101 125 105,946 111,591 111,591
SERVICES AND CHARGES 9,216 11;184 11"18{ 11,522 10 522
i CAPITAL OUTLAY -_0
0 79_5 X265
TOTAL 108,771 115,213 118,255 �aasasaaa aaaaaysaa .oaaa=aaa aa125_D13 123,483
1,1 l
i
RECEIPTS:
FY86 REVISED PROPOSED
ACTUAL ESTIMATE BUDGET
PROPERTY TAX _-_51,309 38,391 _ 43 619
HOUSING PERMITS B.INSPEC 57,462 79,864 79;864
TOTAL a108,771 118 255 123,483
aaavaeao "
oaavvaa---aoaaaa
I;J
114
HOUSZNGYINSPECTORS
BENEFITS
TOTAL
I '
CITY OF IOWA CITY
FY88 OPERATING BUDGETEXPEND
ES
13430 HOUSING INSPECTION SERVICES
TRANSFER T0: ~ '
°ERSONAL SERVICES: '
FTE BUDGET NONE ----- 0
0 A
--- ---- TOTAL
FY87 FY88 $ —
1.00 1.00 19,448
3.00 3.00 23,352
4.00 4.00 __111,591
6C Y'_ ^ 1
'---' INTRA—CITY CHARGEBACKS: l
115
VEHICLE OPERATIONS 6,0000
VEHICLE REPLACEMENT p
WORD PROCESSING p
ADM
EOVERNEAD 0
r
TOTAL _---6,000 _
CAPITAL OUTLAY: A
1 TASK CHAIR ------ 265
TOTAL _265 C�
6J
j
oI`
J
I
PY88YOPERATINGCBUDGET
RECEIPTS AND EXPENDITURES SUMMARY
16100 RECREATION
EXPENDITURES:
-- FY87 BUDGET ----
ACTUAL ADOPTED REVISED DEPT
BUDGET ----
ACTUAL ESTIMATE REQUEST PROPOSED
J PERSONAL S BUDGET
SERVICES 547 08
COMMODITIES 47977 550,475 493,862 562,079
SERVICES AND CHARGES 157 906 51,138 57,011 531,759
TRANSFERS OUTLAY
10,251 1460820 226;820 282,073 264;863
___--- ---- -0 --------0 0
-_--- ---47 4200
TOTAL 786361
..�.:�-�. » .132 ,053 -__
=053 - 95_=.: >: �.9::::94
RECEIPTS:
FY86 FY87 FY88
ACTUAL ESTIMATE PROPOSED BUDGET
PROPERTY TAX 463 000
ADMISSIONS 323,361 440,584 451,727
MOTEL TAX
MIBC$LLANEOUS TRANSFER � U 343,460 33j0�75
43,500
TOTAL --------------�--�
=7ID6_361 - 784,053 909,794
_J
116
V
FY88YOPERATINGCBUDGET
16100E RECREATION
PERSONAL SERVICES:
FTE BUDGET
FY87 FY88 $
1.00 1.00 19,448
1.00 1.00 18,917
1.00 1.00 22,006
1.00 1.00 25,043
1.00 1.00 130;314
212,139
___ _ _ _ 79,751
10_00 10._00 531,759
TOTAL
117
;i
W
tI
TRANSFER TO:
NONE
�
`
0
TOTAL
--------�
..
INTRA—CITY CHARGEBACKS:
I
j
VEHICLE OPERATIONS
VEHICLE REPLACEMENT
3,176
WORD PROCESSING
6,430
ADMINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD
CBD MAINTENANCE
0
0
0
TOTAL
�-
9,606
_
i
CAPITAL OUTLAY:
i
~
SEWING MACHINE
M
PITEYSIUCIIGING
Soo
PAINT ELN
TELEVISION REPLACEMENT
,0
16,500
}
STEREO REPLACEMENT
ESLAPUSHHTYPE
400
avu
2,320
`
SNOWBLOWER
TOTAL
47__420
MI
PERSONAL SERVICES
COMMODITIES
SERVICES AND CHARGES
J CAPITAL OUTLAY
TRANSFERS OUT
TOTAL r r r r r
apaaaap papas:a aaappaa assapaaa aasaaaaas
CITY OF IOWA CITY
q�
i1
v
FY88 OPERATING BUDGET
P4
RECEIPTS AND EXPENDITURES SUMMARY
16200 PARKS
FY87
FY88
---- FY87
BUDGET ----
---- FY88
BUDGET ----
PROPOSED
FY86 ADOPTED
REVISED
DEPT
PROPOSED
ESTIMATE
ACTUAL BUDGET
ESTIMATE
REQUEST
BUDGET
409,075
0
282,481 295,032
299,860
311,789
315,170
MISCELLANEOUS TRANSFER
MISCELLANEOUS
22,961 27,827
27,827
29,079
28,790
107,193 110,200
110,200
106,709
106,597
2,360 1,000
1,000
17,500
33,000
---10_000
0
--------0 ---10,000
414 995 444 059
---10,000
448 887
475 077
483 557
TOTAL r r r r r
apaaaap papas:a aaappaa assapaaa aasaaaaas
q�
i1
P4
RECEIPTS:
FY87
FY88
FY86
REVISED
PROPOSED
ACTUAL
ESTIMATE
BUDGET
PROPERTY TAX
409,075
0
443,271
0
445,941
25,000
MISCELLANEOUS TRANSFER
MISCELLANEOUS
5_920
---_5,616
---12_616
TOTAL
--
414,995
saspaaaa
—448,887
=__
—483,557
=a=aaa
I I
J
Its
f
118
ulL.
iv
FY88YOPERATINGCBUDGET
EXPENDITURES
16200 PARKS
PERSONAL SERVICES:
FTE BUDGET
FY87 FY88 $
M.W.II
AA
SMRWIw.- PARKS
PARKS MOWING
4.00
3.00
4.00
3.00
78,749
67,143
SR. M.N. - PARKS CONSTRUCTION
SUPERINTENDENT
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
25;043
TEMPO
OVERTII E -
1.00
1.00
33,342
BENEFITS
20,701
1,125
•�
____
------__O
66,166
TOTAL
10.00
aaaaa
_____
10.00
__
315,170
aaaaa
aevaacovv
119
ryA�
AA
i�
u1
I
F1
TRANSFER TO:
..
NONE
0
•�
TOTAL
------__O
� I
INTRA -CITY CHARGEBACKS:
VEHICLE OPERATIONS
VEHICLE
ORDC ROCESSINGG
41,024
_
28,603
ADMINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD
CBD MAINTENANCE
0
0
0
TOTAL
69,627
CAPITAL OUTLAY:
PLBG ATIHICKORY4HILLRRR�
2.500
TREE REPLACEMENT
3,000
MOWER
ELECTRICAL
5,000
WORK ONSHELTERS
REPLACE PLI►yGROUND Q
3,000
5,000
ESL -WATER TO SHELTER
REPLACE1,500
10 PICNIC TABLES
10,000
$
3,000
TOTAL
__
33,000,
s) '
G3
-
ryA�
CITY OF IOWA CITY
FY88 OPERATING BUDGET
RECEIPTS AND EXPLoo IDITUR S SUMMARY
j
EXPENDITURES:
FY86
---- FY87
ADOPTED
BUDGET ----
REVISED
---- FY88
DEPT
BUDGET ----
PROPOSED
BUDGET
ACTUAL
BUDGET
ESTIMATE
REQUEST
PERSONAL SERVICES
829,474
30,467
868,533
29,100
870,154
29,100
905,985
31,700
191,260
905,985
31,700
191,260
COMMODITIES
SERVICES AND CHARGES
183,197
156,964
188,070
173 500
188,070
173_500
183_500
183;500
i
OUTLAY
3_500
-
-
J
TRANSFERS
-
1,22033 602
-----_--
11062'.2,028
-
1r1 2�6�9sialy::vmv
cr�l3sB�a
1
.TOTAL
1 J
'
�j
RECEIPTS:
FY87
REVISED
FY88
PROPOSED
IFY86
ACTUAL
ESTIMATE
BUDGET
�j
`
PROPERTY TAX
& CONTR
999,369
191,678
1,041,539
208,659
1,086,113
213,846
13 936
LIBRARY SERVICES
CABLE TV CHARGEBACK
I2_555
---- ---
13451
----- ---
r
---------
TOTAL.
---------
1,20
1asOs�ms8
i��6/a6a4a
1
raa31/a095
-I
:J
. i
120
a•[r3 ..c?.{..1 np e» i, alt: , ;.•...
N1iA�1iFR'31d 11LY ., e..n cLl,
.
Y
TOTAL
CITY OF IOWA CITY
FY88 OPERATING BUDGET
EXPENDITURES
16300 LIBRARY
PERSONAL SERVICES:
TRANSFER TO:
FTE
BUDGET
EQUIP. REPLACE. RESERVE
FY87
FY88
$
TOTAL
2.00
2.00
36,274
4.00
4.00
77,792
2.00
2.00
41,684
1
1.00
1.00
21,570
CI
2.00
2.00
44,762
1.00
1.00
22,901
i
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
27,810
22,838
INTRA -CITY CHARGEBI
1UUNITY SER
1.00
1.00
31,574
VEHICLE
REPLACEMENT
)RH SERV
1.00
1.00
31,491
WORD PROCESSING
INICAL SER
.H SERVICE
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
26,099
29,370
ADMINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD
CBD MAINTENANCE
)R
1.00
1.00
32,510
1.00
1.00
43,056
PT
PT
2.25
1.25
2.25
1.25
38,429
23,639
TOTAL
PTJ
.50
.50
10,421
PT
PT
1.25
1.25
33,550
94,000
13,500
CAPITAL OUTLAY:
168,648
LIBRARY MATERIALS
_
26.75
__
-----
26.75
905,985
EXTERIOR BRICK REPAIR
COMPUTER UPGRADE: 2ND OF 4
===ea
===aa
a=m====ea
TYPEWRITER WITH PRINTER
TOTAL
121
3,500
3,500
!KS: 0
0
0
0
141,310
3,000 tkl
35,840
1, 300 li
181,450
=aaa=eeca
[€1
11
G3 J
-1
ml
CITY OF IOWA CITY
RECEIPTS ANDPEXPENDITUREES SUMMARY
i— i
16500 PARKS 6 RECREATION
ADMIN
_.
EXPENDITURES:
i
FY86 ___ FY87
ACTUAL BUDGET
BUDGET,----
REVISED
--__ FY88
BUDGET ----
BUDGET
ESTIMATE
REQUEST
PROPOSED
BUDGET
PERSONAL SERVICES
i—
COMMODITIES
SERVICES AND CHARGES
CAPITAL
47 396
,241 76,274
2,992
781874
83,360
362
83,360
`
i I
OUTLAY
X863 2,175
2,411
4,3640
4,214
j
TOTAL
_
51,492 '-----
r
175
---------
--------0
_____'875
___
;
aaa .,,.... aai79+ais:
as+8s1:734
aca08,086
.
asa89,096
aaa
i
RECEIPTS:
FY87
ACTUAL
FY88
PROPOSED
ESTIMATE
ESTIMATE
BUDGET
PROPERTY TAX
51,492
_.
TOTAL
_ ...
-__-_=-__ ___81,734
51,49!
aaaaaaaaa
89,096
89 096
aaaai�a�a
Yi
'
Il
J
j
i�
i
122
FY88YOPERATINGCBUDGET
16500 PARESP&NRE RECREATION ADMIN
PERSONAL SERVICES: TRANSFER TO:.
FTE BUDGET NONE
FY87 FY88 $ TOTAL
ADMIN. SEC. - PARES 8 REC 1.00 1.00 22,734
PARRS i RECREATION DIRECTOR 1.00 1.00 45,906
OVERTIME
BENEFITS - _ _ ___ ___14,330
TOTAL 2.00 2.00 83,360
INTRA -CITY CHARGEBA
VEHICLE REPLACEMENT
WORD PROCESSING
ADMINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD
CBD MAINTENANCE
123
TOTAL
CAPITAL OUTLAY:
ESL-TABLE
SHELVES
TOTAL
ry
,
i
�i
0
i
CRS:
0
—
0
0
0
0
0
sasaaaasa
� ..
300
575_
------875
c
aa:aaaaaae
;
f
G3
�I
'
CITY OF IOWA CITY
FY88 OPERATING BUDGET
RECEIPTS AND EXPENDITURES SUMMARY
16700 SENIOR CENTER
_-
EXPENDITURES.
-_ -- FY87
BUDGET ----
-_ -- FY68
BUDGET ----
FY86
ACTUAL
ADOPTED
BUDGET
REVISED
ESTIMATE
DEPT
REQUEST
PROPOSED
BUDGET
'
PERSONAL SERVICES
111,963
5,550
129,003
6,458
129,917
7,153
139,779
6,833
139,659
6,733
COMMODITIES
SERVICES AND CHARGES
83,112
79,157
79,157
75,590
78,090
CAPITAL
AFEERSS OUTLAY
4,000
6,000
6,000
0
6,000
TOTAL
205,353
--220,618
222,227
222,202
!ii>tifOs
230,482
iiYYili
si��Mii1•
iiliii>(ii
ii�iYYi
RECEIPTS:
FY86
REVISED
PROPOSED
ACTUAL
ESTIMATE
BUDGET
n
`
j
PROPERTY TAX
SR CENTER SERVICES i
r 283
CON 41,070
948
44_279
-_184,131
46_351
-�
TOTAL
X164
205,353
=-177
222,227
230,482
125
TRANSFER TO:
PARKING OPERATIONS
TOTAL
p
e I ,
w
6,000
--- —
6, 000
_ J
INTRA—CITY CHARGEBACKS:
VEHICLE
OPERATIONS
EPI ACEMENT 250
WORD PROCESSING4,212
0 —
ADMINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD 4,210
CBD MAINTENANCE 0
11 iA
TOTAL 4,462
CITY OF IOWA CITY
t.
FY88
OPERATING BUDGET
?
0
i
(
16700xSENIOR
CENTER
PERSONAL SERVICES:
f
k
FTE BUDGET
FY87
FY88 $
SR. CLERK/TYPIST — SR. CENTER
M.W.II SR.CENTER
1.00
1.00 16,702
'I
PROGRAM SPECIALIST—SR. CENTER
SR. CENTER
1.00
1.00
1.00 19 926
,
1.00 28
COORDINATOR
VOLUNTEER SPECIALIST—SR CENTE(PT)
1
1.00
,808
1.00 30,514
OVVEERTIMMEEIES
.50
.50 11,840
3,508
BENEFITS
28,151
TOTAL
__ __ _
4,50 139,659
—4_50
125
TRANSFER TO:
PARKING OPERATIONS
TOTAL
p
e I ,
w
6,000
--- —
6, 000
_ J
INTRA—CITY CHARGEBACKS:
VEHICLE
OPERATIONS
EPI ACEMENT 250
WORD PROCESSING4,212
0 —
ADMINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD 4,210
CBD MAINTENANCE 0
11 iA
TOTAL 4,462
` I
CAPITAL OUTLAY:
j
y
0
i
TOTAL --------p
wI
's
R�
w
PI
-1
b�
4
-
CITY OF IOWA
CITY
FY88 OPERATING
BUDGET
v
PARKING OPERATIONS
FY86
FY87
FY88
-'
ACTUAL
ESTIMATE
PROPOSED
BEGINNING BALANCE
495,756
309,664
13,049
J
TOTAL BALANCE
495,756
309,664
13,049
i
PARKING FINES
INTEREST INCOME
152,435
96,742
178,200
78,000
192,000 j
65,000
EI«
BUILDING RENTALS
PARKING RAMP REVENUE
6,087
996,755
6,087
1,105,070
6,087
1,129,830
OTHER PARKING REVENUE
SR. CENTER PARKING
462,901
4,000
501,420
6,000
512,908
6,000
MISCELLANEOUS
478
11111111---
1,000
1,000
TOTAL RECEIPTS
1,719,398
------1-000
1,875,777
------1-000
1,912,825
^{
{�
PERSONAL SERVICES
COMMODITIES
----5---_-_999-90-91-
-572,733
-5590,914
111- -
-663333 ,948
SERVICES AND CHARGES
-34,315
-250,236
-21,520
-3011631
-20,368
-313,026
CAPITAL OUTLAY
TRANSFERS
-7,064
-1,041,142
-29,636
-1,224,554
-41,732
-896,500
CONTINGENCY
0
----
-3,837
-20,000
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
-1,905,490
-2,172,392
-1,925,874
-
--___13,049
---__---__0
ENDING BALANCE
309,664
_
vmnsaavmaaa
mm�amaammma
aannamamava
I
i
k M
!!
126
g (3
b�
4
CITY OF IOWA CITY
RECEIPTSBANDPEXPENDITURSSESUMMARY
41100 PARKING OPERATIONS
EXPENDITURES:
RECEIPTS:
PARKING FINES
INTEREST INCOME
BUILDING RENTALS
PARKING RAMP REVENUE
OTHER PARKING REVENUE
MISCELLANEOUS
TOTAL
FY86
ACTUAL
FY86
ACTUAL
- - FY87
ADOPTED
BUDGET
BUDGET ----
REVISED
---- FY88
DEPT
BUDGET ----
PROPOSED
6,087
996;755
1,105#070
1,129;830
ESTIMATE
REQUEST
BUDGET
PERSONAL SERVICES
COMMODITIES
572,733
34 315
594,751
590,914
633,948
633,948 1 j
SERVICES AND CHARGES
CAPITAL OUTLAY
250236
0 064
315 280
29
21,820
301,631
21,368
209,456
20,368
313,026
TRANSFERS OUT
CONTINGENCY
1,041,142
036
1,346,945
29,636
1,224,554
21,732
0
41,732
896 800
_0
_ 0
3,837
0
20,000 j
TOTAL
1,905,490
2,307,832
asaasaa=o
_
2,172,392
_ _
886,504
�
1,925,874
925 874 "
eoeoeeeov
eovoe=coe
RECEIPTS:
PARKING FINES
INTEREST INCOME
BUILDING RENTALS
PARKING RAMP REVENUE
OTHER PARKING REVENUE
MISCELLANEOUS
TOTAL
FY86
ACTUAL
REVISED
ESTIMATE
PROPOSED
BUDGET
152,435
96,742
178,200
78,000
192,000
65,000
6,087
996;755
1,105#070
1,129;830
462,901
4,000 X478
501,420
1;000
512,908
1;000
1,719,398
1,875,777
__
1,912,825
127
-
CITY OF IOWA CITY
FY88
OPERATING BUDGET
i
EXPENDITURES
41100
PARKING OPERATIONS
PERSONAL SERVICES:
FTE BUDGET
--$---
FY87
FY88
M.W.I-PARKING
SYSTEMS 2.00
2.00 33,304
J
PARKING CASHIER
4.00
4.00 70,056
PARKING ENFORCEMENT
ATTENDANT 4.00
4.00 75,048
M.W.II -
PARKING SYSTEMS 1.00
1.00 19,030
M.W.II-PARKING
SYSTEMS -TOWING 1.00
1.00 19,105
(
M.W.III-PARKING
SYSTEMS METER 1.00
1.00 21,570
J
M.W.III-PARKING
NIGHT CREW 1.00
1.00 20, 296
M.W.III-PARKING
SYSTEMS ELEC. 1.00
1.00 22,901
P.M. RAMP
MANAGER 1.00
1.00 23,878
PARKING SYSTEM
SUPERINTENDENT 1.00
1.00 32,781
PARKING CASHIER
PT
7.00
7.00 118,118
PARKING ENFORCEMENT
ATTENDANT
PT
1.50
1.50 27,623
TEMPORARIES
20,494
BENEFITS
OVERTIME-----
1251744
TOTAL 25.50
----- ----4,000
25.50 633,948
J
1
i
e.'
i
1
128
w
J
TRANSFER TO:
GENERAL FUND - FINES192 000
GENERAL FUND - REPAY LOAN 20:000
RENEWAL & IMPR. RESERVE 60 000
BOND & INTEREST SINKING 624;800
TOTAL 896,800
sssssaacs
INTRA -CITY CHARGEBACKS:
VEHICLE OPERATIONS 11,182
VEHICLE REPLACEMENT 539
WORD PROCESSING '200
ADMINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD 108,265
CBD MAINTENANCE 0
TOTAL 127,186
CAPITAL OUTLAY:
3 WORK BENCH CHAIRS 600
METER REPLACEMENT 20,000
DOORS AT CAPITOL ST. RAMP 21,132
TOTAL 41,732
No
FY88TGPERATING BUDGET
PARKING, BOND RESERVE
129
ESTIMATE
--
651,114
--651,1_14
0
0
----- —0
----------0
651,114
FY86
ACTUAL
BEGINNING BALANCE
o
TOTAL BALANCE
____455_601
INTEREST INCOME
455601
------- ,---
BOND SALES
BOND ORDINANCE TRANSFERS
184,934
TOTAL RECEIPTS
_____ 10,579
TRANSFERS
------_ 195_513 --_
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
----------0
0
__-- 0
ENDING BALANCE
651,114
651,114
-oxxxaxxaaa
-_xvoaxoxx
129
ESTIMATE
--
651,114
--651,1_14
0
0
----- —0
----------0
651,114
o
PROPOSED
65_1,1_14
I
0
0
".
h
-O
j
0
I
651,114
-oxxxaxxaaa
._-
j
CITY OF IOWA CITY
FY88 RENEWALN& IMPROV RES
i —pARKING,
I
FY86 FY87 FY88
i
ACTUAL ESTIMATE PROPOSED
0 50,260 —__ 110_260
BEGINNING BALANCE —_= ------0 _--_ 50_260 110,260
TOTAL BALANCE 60,0000 60,0000
TRANSFERS 60,000 ----------
BOND ORDIN N!ClEOPBR1►TIONS -- ----------- 60,000
TRANSFER FROM ---- 60,000
[ 60,000 —'0
—7 TOTAL RECEIPTS ___9740 --___—____0 0
SERVICES AND CHARGES 0 _ _.__0_
-y 0
CAPITAL
PRAjSFEERS LAY --_-----_ - ---_--—__—___
p 0 r
—9,740 -
TOTAL EXPENDITURES ----------- 170,260
50,260 10,260
oaaaaaaaaaa aaaa:1aaass
ENDING BALANCE
Its
r i
d
1 �
�t
J
i
l ;
130
mi
G7
BEGINNING BALANCE
TOTAL BALANCE
BOND SALES ORDINANCE
TRANSFERS
TOTAL RECEIPTS
CAPITALSOUAT yCHARGES
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
ENDING BALANCE
CITY OF IOWA
FY88 OPERATING
SINKING RESERVE
CITY
BUDGET
-
PARKING
1985 ISSUE
a
it
FY86
ACTUALFY87
ESTIMATE
FY88
o-
PROPOSED
------___-280_212
---- __-
275/723
--_ 12 ,875 ----280_2
12
__ --275_723
----2 67_382
---'-'
_
468930
- --- --- ---
-- 280,2_57
--- -----
--
/930
----447_945
--_-468
___---_
__- 447_945
--------
------ 0 -__
p -473,419
--_--__
_ 0
_ -45
... :447,195
aaxa28313
a_
=a=== 275,=23
276 473
=x==a=xaxaa
i~
i
i+
AR.
"
131
BEGINNING BALANCE
TOTAL BALANCE
BOND ORDINANCE
TRANSFERS
TOTAL RECEIPTS
CAPITAL OUTLAY
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
ENDING BALANCE
CITY OF IOWA CITY
FY88 OPERATING BUDGET
SINKING RESERVE - 1986 ISSUE
PARKING
FY86 FY87
ACTUAL E
0
2x244
0
-2_244
0
-'-----"m o
msasmaea:44
ma
132
STINATE
2,244
-2,244
--__197,424
---- !M!!!
---- :MM
----- 76_953
122,715
PROPOSED
_122_715
____122_715
---- 176,a55
17_6__8_55
_-_-178_643
___178,643
120,927
aa:aavasvasm
CITY OF IOWA
POLLUTIONPCONTROL
CITY
OPERATIONS
01
w.
FY86
ACTUAL
FY87
ESTIMATE
PROPOSED
w
It
BEGINNING BALANCE
TOTAL BALANCE
446,746
-------=-_-
583,293
308,200
i
CHARGES FOR SERVICES
446,746
--"
583_293
----
308_200
roti
INTEREST INCOME
INTERFUND LOAN
1,584;373
198 192
2 375;000
___
4,475,000
MISCELI lnpofjS
TOTAL RECEIPTS
39,494_
--1-622
1_889
--__- - '-_
1_889
PERSONAL SERVICES
059
---=---=---
3_150_448
------_ ---
4__822_083
-PERSONAL
COMMODITIES
SERVICES AND CHARGES
-488,292
r
-505,803
71;400
-534
_
CAPITAL OUTLAY,
TRANSFERS
-433,354
-7,252
-462;623
-13,100
-476 260
CONTINGENCY
-709,090
-2,376,121
-10,000
-3,264,050
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
_ _ _0 _____
3,506
-22,000
-,425_541
_3
------- ---
-4,378,564
-
ENDING BALANCE
583,293
ooeaasa=aaa aaa_30a=�00
=__---9
751,719
IIj
I
r
133
1
134
i
PROPOSED
BUDGET
4,345,194
475,000
_1,889
4,822,083
-t
CITY OF IOWA CITY
FY88 OPERATING BUDGET
RECEIPTS AND
FY87
REVISED
CHARGES
ACTUAL
EXPENDITURES SUMMARY
42100 POLLUTION CONTROL OPERATIONS
FOR SERVICES
INTEREST INCOME
i
EXPENDITURES:
MISCELLANEOUS
375,000
FY86
ACTUAL
FY87
ADO
ADOPTED
BUDGET
BUDGET -___
REVISED
ESTIMATE
--__ FY88
DEPT
BUDGET ----
PROPOSED
----
3,150,448
PERSONAL SERVICES
REQUEST
BUDGET
` I
J
COMMODITIES
SERVICES AND CHARGES
CAPITAL OUTLAY
488 292
433354
5711400
413
571;400
532 9
' 15
71,319
534,915
TRANSFERS OUT
CONTINGENCY
709 050
100
509;2588
413;100
265,000
71,319
476,280
10,000
0
---TOTAL------
2,376,121
'3506
' 0
3,264 050
j,,6685,=512
---------------
1,563,679
---
--'----�
9
--
4,378,564
--873,029
�wgp
RECEIPTS:
1
134
i
PROPOSED
BUDGET
4,345,194
475,000
_1,889
4,822,083
-t
FY86
FY87
REVISED
CHARGES
ACTUAL
FOR SERVICES
INTEREST INCOME
1,584,373
198 1 92
2'773,559
MISCELLANEOUS
375,000
_-_39_494
1,889
TOTAL
1,822,059
----
3,150,448
1
134
i
PROPOSED
BUDGET
4,345,194
475,000
_1,889
4,822,083
-t
TOTAL
CITY OF IOWA
CITY
25,646
FY88
OPERATING BUDGET
N CONTROL 1.00
1.00
EXPENDITURES
42100 POLLUTION CONTROL OPERATIONS
PERSONAL SERVICES:
1.00
30,846
TRANSFER TO:
FTE
BUDGET
BOND & INTEREST SINKING
37,877
VEHICLE REPLACEMENT
12,150
RENEWAL RESERVE
12,040
WORD PROCESSING
ABATED G&OIMPR.BON
FY67
FY88
$
ADMINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD 177,897
TOTAL
CONTROL 2.00
2.00
36,826
17 0
LL. CONTRO 1.00
1.00
17,670
. CONTROL 3.00
3.00
60,907
COLLECTIO 1.00
1.00
22,901
CONTROL 4.00
4.00
91,197
T. PLANT 2.00
2.00
46,946
3,022,550
240,000
1,500
3,264,050
1.00
1.00
25,646
INTRA -CITY CHARGEBACKS:
N CONTROL 1.00
1.00
27,810
ON CONTROL 1.00
1.00
30,846
VEHICLE OPERATIONS
18,699
UPT 1.00
1.00
37,877
VEHICLE REPLACEMENT
12,150
12,040
WORD PROCESSING
40
11,881
ADMINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD 177,897
CBD MAINTENANCE
0
17 00
17 0
-112,368
534 915
0 TOTAL 208,786
CAPITAL OUTLAY: r
ESL -SAFE FOR CHEMICALS 3,000 0li
ESL -SEWER TAPPING MACHINE 4 000
GAS DETECTOR -- 3,000
TOTAL 10,000
V4
i
i
BEGINNING BALANCE
TOTAL BALANCE
INTEREST INCOME
BOND ORDINANCE TRANSFERS
TOTAL RECEIPTS
CAPITAL OUTLAY
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
ENDING 8AIANCE
_.1
iI
S4,
m. r71r' `
CITY OF IOWA CITY
POLL CON,, RREENEWGBBIMPRTRES
FY86
ACTUAL
702,221
702,221
24,000
24_000
0
0
726,221
aaaaaaaaaaa
136
FY87
ESTIMATE
726,221
726,221
1,523_29_8
1,523,298
--------- 0
0
2,249,519
vaavosasaaa
FY88
PROPOSED
2_249_519
2,249,519
240,000
240,000
0
0
2,489,519
avoaaaasaaa
)
v
mi
CITY OF IOWA
CITY
'
FY88 OPERATING
BUDGET
_
POLL CON, BOND
& INT RES
i
FY86
FY87
FY88
I
ACTUAL
ESTIMATE
PROPOSED
�+ �
BEGINNING BALANCE
296,738_
308,738
3,672,550
?
TOTAL BALANCE
296,738
308,738
3,672,550
INTEREST INCOME
0
0
p
BOND SALES
BOND ORDINANCE TRANSFERS
12,000
3,672,5500
U
i3
�I
TOTAL RECEIPTS
TRANSFERS
-----------
0
-------�--
-308,,738
---'----'-0
0
i
I
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
_--_-12000
_----0
_-3,672,550
-_-_--_--_p
ENDING BALANCE
308,738
3,672,550
3,672,550
-
asasasaavaa
aaeaaa�aaa
avevaeeaaaa:
1i
to
S
137
BEGINNING BALANCE
TOTAL BALANCE
BOND ORDINANCE TRANSFERS
CITY OF IOWA CITY
FY88 OPERATING BUDGET NIS
SINKING RESERVE - 1986 ISSUE
FY86
ACTUAL
0
-----------
-----------
0
TOTAL RECEIPTS
CAPITAL OUTLAY ---------- 0
TOTAL EXPENDITURES0
---------
A.
ENDING BALANCE 0
aaaxaaaaaaa
1 J
S
138
FY87 FY88
ESTIMATE PROPOSED
0
----------
0
2,770,671
2,770,671
-1,259_396
-1,259,396
1,511,275
aaaxmaaaasa
1,511,275
1,511,275
3,022,550
3,022,550
-3,022,550
_3,022_550
1,511,275
aaxxaaamasa
FY88TOPERATING BUDGET
DEFEASED REVENUE BONDS
139
FY88
PROPOSED
-__
626,988
_ 626,988
58,700
0
_58_700
_
-100,610
_100,610
585,078
nvv=aaams.m
FY86
ACTUAL
FY87
ESTIMATE
BEGINNING BALANCE
0
TOTAL BALANCE
0
_--_-_____0
_ 0
__-_-21,730
MISCELLANEOUS TRANSFERS
0
69_4_361
TOTAL RECEIPTS
0
TRANSFERS
716,_091
_ 0
-89,103
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
____
0
_
89_103
ENDING BALANCE
0
oxxaxvvaavo
626,988
.xo.ax:ax�aa
139
FY88
PROPOSED
-__
626,988
_ 626,988
58,700
0
_58_700
_
-100,610
_100,610
585,078
nvv=aaams.m
I
;..1
BEGINNING BALANCE
TOTAL BALANCE
ODODME
BRINANCES TRANSFERS
TOTAL RECEIPTS
SERVICES AND CHARGES
CAPITAL OUTLAY
TRANSFERS
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
ENDING BALANCE
CITY OF IOWA CITY
POLLYCON,, BONDI&GINTOSINKING
FY86
ACTUAL
---124_051
-_--124,051
101,921
101,921
-100,298
--- - 0
-100,298
125=674
140
FY87
ESTIMATE
125,674
--_125,674
_ 89,103
_89,103
-104,846
109_931
214,777
FY88
PROPOSED
-------0
____---0
_100,610
100,610
-100,610
0
-100,610
0
.0
I'
BEGINNING
BALANCE'
TOTAL BALANCE
INTEREST INCOME
BOND SALES
TOTAL RECEIPTS
TRANSFERS
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
ENDING BALANCE
FY88TOPERATING BUDGET
DEFEASED ABATEMENTS ON G.O.
FY86
ACTUAL
FY87
ESTIMATE
----------0
____ 0
--------- O
----_----'0
0
0
_____2
85,436
_721_267
__!L721
_-1
___ ____0
__1,82203
---------- 0
_-_-396_905
---------- 0
--__ ___
__--396_905
0
1,409,798
141
FY88
PROPOSED
{ i
1,409,798
wI
1,40_9,7_98
iI
93,994
- 93__99_4
-_--380,920
r i
_--_380_920
1,122,872
=aoasaaa�aa
BEGINNING BALANCE
TOTAL BALANCE
WATER SALES
TTRANNSFER INCOME
RESERVES
MISCELLANEOUS
TOTAL RECEIPTS
PERSONAL SERVICES
COMMODITIES
SERVICES AND CHARGES
CAPITAL OUTLAY
'OONNNTINGENCY
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
INDING BALANCE
FY88TOPERATING BUDGET
WATER OPERATIONS
FY86
ACTUAL
0
0
1,723,741
99,520
142,105
--___39_341
2,004,707
250,555
787,019
124,632
-177,735
0
--1_927,130
77,577
oo�vaeo�ae
142
FY87
ESTIMATE
77,577
77,577
2,038,160
2,2001
2,_072,4_61
-608,516
224,510
-823,202
-219,000
190,554
-9,158
__2_074,940
75,098
eaavaeaaaao
FY88
PROPOSED
75,098
75,098
2,228,096
5,512
-----32,1000
_ 2,265,708
-649,349
-287,350
776,376
160,000
210,035
-_ -37_000
_2_120_110
220,696
vaooeoeavoa
of
K-
FY88YOPERATINGCBUDGET
RECEIPTS AND EXPENDITURES SUMMARY
43100 WATER OPERATIONS
EXPENDITURES:
RECEIPTS:
FY86
ACTUAL
-- FY87
ADOPTED
BUDGET
BUDGET 2222
REVISED
---- FY88
DEPT
BUDGET ----
PROPOSED
BUDGET
WATER SALES ME
FROM
ESTIMATE
REQUEST
BUDGET
PERSONAL SERVICES
COMMODITIES
SERVICES AND CHARGES
587 189
250 555
787;019
617,674
859,260
608,516
224,510
651,349
649,349
CAPITAL OUTLAY
TRANSFERS OUT
124,632
177,730
219
823,202
275,850
723,050
287,350
776
CONTINGENCY
273,865
190 554
167,000
160,000
30 035
TOTAL
1027,130
0
9_158
0
_ 37,0
a�`=317
2,074_940
1,817,2449
2,120,110
los=ova
2,120,110
RECEIPTS:
143
94
w
FY86FY87
ACTUAL
REVISEED
FY86
PROPOSED
BUDGET
WATER SALES ME
FROM
1,723,741
99,520
2,038,160
2,228,096
TRANSFER RESERVES
MISCELLANEOUS
142,105
2x2001
5,512
39,'341
2100-
32,100
0
32,100
TOTAL
�,�004_707 707
_-
2--072 ,461
_
2_-265,-708
2265___
143
94
w
I �
i
9
R TOTAL
CITY OF IOWA CITY
FY88 OPERATING BUDGET
EXPENDITURES•
43100 WATER OPERATIONS
PERSONAL SERVICES:
FTE BUDGET
FY87 FY88 $
2.00 2.00 34,374
2.00 2.00 35,218
3.00 3.00 59,231
1.00 1.00 19,626
2.00 2.00 391834
1.00 1.00 210570
4.00 4.00 88,744
3.00 3.00 68,763
1.00 1.00 27,582
1.00 1.00 27,921
1.00 1.00 28,829
1.00 1.00 36,816
10,000
23,000
127,841
22.00 22.00 6491349
��saa vo.vc c==oecovo
144
TRANSFER TO:
ABATED GO BONDS 174,035
DEPR., EXT., & IMPR. RESERVE_ 36,000
TOTAL 210,035
INTRA -CITY CHARGEBACRS:
VEHICLE OPERATIONS 28,267
VEHICLE REPLACEMENT 34,800
ADMINISOTRRATIVEGOVERHEAD
CBD MAINTENANCE 231,055
0
TOTAL _-294,322
CAPITAL OUTLAY:
REPLACE & EXTEND MAINS 124,000
WATER METERS 26,000
ROOF REPLACEMENT -LIFT BLDG. 10,000
TOTAL 160,000
v
-7
y
I
�J
144
TRANSFER TO:
ABATED GO BONDS 174,035
DEPR., EXT., & IMPR. RESERVE_ 36,000
TOTAL 210,035
INTRA -CITY CHARGEBACRS:
VEHICLE OPERATIONS 28,267
VEHICLE REPLACEMENT 34,800
ADMINISOTRRATIVEGOVERHEAD
CBD MAINTENANCE 231,055
0
TOTAL _-294,322
CAPITAL OUTLAY:
REPLACE & EXTEND MAINS 124,000
WATER METERS 26,000
ROOF REPLACEMENT -LIFT BLDG. 10,000
TOTAL 160,000
v
-7
®l
FY88TOPERATING BUDGET
WATER, DEPR, EXT & IMPR RES
FY86
ACTUAL
FY87
ESTIMATEPROPOSED
.�
BEGINNING BALANCE
TOTAL BALANCE
44,850
----- -'_---
-----_-___0
36,000,q
I
INTEREST INCOME
TRANSFER FROM
44, 850
-----44,8s _
0
----___�_-�
_______
26,000
--""-
OPERATIONS
36,000
0
361000
---
0
TOTAL RECEIPTS
---_-__---_
----__
- r
TRANSFERS
36,000
---_--___-_
_____36_000
_____36,000
36 ,000
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
-80,850
-----"""
0
----__'''-0
ENDING BALANCE
----------
0
3600 0
aaaaaavoo
72,000
vavvvvvavaa
6{
111
L� !
145
�d .
V
al
ei.
FY88TOPERATING
BUDGET
DEFEASED REVENUE BONDS
ACTUAL
FY87
ESTIMATE EST
FY88
PROPOSED
BEGINNING BALANCE
TOTAL BALANCE
----------0
652,894
'--'
612,866
i
INTEREST INCOME
----------
-__-652_894
612,866
TRANSFER FROM ENTERPRISE FUND56,34b0
652,894
48,068
_
TOTAL RECEIPTS
---------- -
0
TRANSFERS
652,894
--------_-_ ----
m56,345
---"'-'-'-
48,068
-:
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
O
-��--__"'�
-_96 373
� __
_-_- 98,5_80
W
O _-----96_373
---612,866
-198_580
ENDING
BALANCE
____-__ ___
652,894
aaaasaaaata a��a•a=xaaa
462,354
eavaaaasaaa
C�
146
V
al
ei.
BEGINNING BALANCE
TOTAL BALANCE
INTEREST INCOME
TRANSFER FROM OPERATIONS
TRANSFER FROM RESERVES
TOTAL RECEIPTS
CAPITAL OUTLAY
TRANSFERS•
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
ENDING BALANCE
L -
CITY OF IOWA CITY
FY88 OPERATING BUDGET
WATER BOND & INT SINKING
FY86
FY87
FY88
ACTUAL
ESTIMATE
PROPOSED
209,470
3,695
0
209,470
-_--_____-_
3,695
---------_-
0
0
0
0
127,800
96,373 198,580
127,809
---
96,373
----100-0--
198,580
-----------
:1--74---54-
-10
-100,068
0
-198,580
0
-15p,,044
-----1111--
"_-----'-'
-----''--__
-333,584
1111-111'1-
-100,068
1111--1111-
-198,580
----'------
3,695
0
0
147
-I
CITY OF IOWA CITY
FY88 OPERATING BUDGET
REFUSE COLLECTION OPERATIONS
'i
�J
FY87
FY88
i
BEGINNING BALANCE
PROPOSED
'
TOTAL BALANCE
l
57,704 i
_----34_021
CHARGES FOR BERVICEa
57,704
0
553369
REFUSE COLLECTION FEES
------
9,507 ;
593,093
INTEREST INCOME
8,264
CBD MAINT CHARGEBACRS
8 767
0
PROPERTY TAX TRANSFER
0
—__----__--
MISCELLANEOUS
0
571,029
TOTAL RECEIPTS
-------;---
614j240
��yy~
PERSONAL
014
—286,337
by
ODITIESRVICES
—2,306
—308,095
SERVICES AND CHARGES
—319,704
_ 0
CONTINGENCY
k
---_564,657
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
--__620,347
40,393
ENDING BALANCE
51,597
J
i
I
a.i
1'
ICI
al
V
FY86
FY87
FY88
ACTUAL
ESTIMATE
PROPOSED
34,021
40,393
l
57,704 i
_----34_021
57,704
0
553369
-----40,393
0
572 873
------
9,507 ;
593,093
8,264
8,512
8 767
0
0
0
—__----__--
-----------
0
571,029
587,203_
-------;---
614j240
—253,934
—269,295
—286,337
—2,628
—2,747
—2,306
—308,095
—296,198
—319,704
_ 0
_1,652
—12,000
---_564,657
---_569,892
--__620,347
40,393
57,704
51,597
i
I
II
148
RECEIPTS:
FY86FY87
ACTUAL
ESTIMATE
FYSS
PROPOSED
BUDGET
CHARGES FOR SERVICES
FEES
INTEREST IINCOMEON
CBD MAINT CHARGERACXS
559,396
31
575,818
593:093
TOTAL
__ 8,264
__ H_513
_ ---
CITY OF IOWA CITY
RECEIPTSBANDPEXPENDITUREESESUMMARY
571,029
=a=a=====
587
_===_,203
- --- ---
44100 REFUSE COLLECTION OPERATIONS
--614,240
EXPENDITURES;
I
-- -- FY87
ACTUAL ADOPTED
BUDGET
BUDGET GET ----
-- -- FY88
BUDGET --
'
PERSONAL
ESTIMATE
REQUEST
PROPOSED
BUDGET
SERVICES
COMMODITIES
253,934 270,947
SERVICES AND CHARGES
2,628
308,095 2'747
296,380
269 295
2i 747
283 332
286,337
TOTAL
0
291 652
244,573
319;704
564,657 570__-_
maamaassm amsaaia79
___------
569,892
mmmsa aaa
__ __ __0
242 534,
12,000?
--_-- ---
620,347
.- I
masa=242
=a><maaasv
RECEIPTS:
149
FY86FY87
ACTUAL
ESTIMATE
FYSS
PROPOSED
BUDGET
CHARGES FOR SERVICES
FEES
INTEREST IINCOMEON
CBD MAINT CHARGERACXS
559,396
31
575,818
593:093
TOTAL
__ 8,264
__ H_513
_ ---
2r 873
8,767
571,029
=a=a=====
587
_===_,203
- --- ---
--614,240
149
TOTAL
TRANSFER TO:
TOTAL 10_75 ----- -___-_675 INTRA -CITY CHARGEBACRS:
10:75 10.75 286,337 VEHICLE OPERATIONS
'-j
�J
f �
I�
---------------------------------------------------
l * Asst Su t -
HICLE REPLi10EftNT 06,647
ADM ISTTRRAETIVENGOVERHEAD 51,118
CBD MAINTENANCE 48,210
0
TOTAL 185,975
========_
NONE
CAPITALOUTLAY:
0
TOTAL ----"'-0
• p . Solid Waste: 50$ of FTE is shown here; remainder funded in Landfill Operations.
**
Street/ Sanitation Supt.: 25% of FTE is shown here; remainder funded in Street System Main-
tenance and Landfill Operations.
I
150
FY86YOPERATINGCBUDGET
44100 REFUSEXCOLLECTTION OPERATIONS
PERSONAL SERVICES:
I
FTE BUDGET NONE
--- ------
FY87
FY88 $
11. W I - REFUSE
J N.W.II - REFUSE
6.00
6.00 109,857
ASST SUPT - #*STREETISANITATION WASTE
4.00
•50
4.00 83,970
•50 13,905
RRAR
OVERTINEIES
25
.25 8,767
7,980
BENEFITS
5,183
9
TOTAL
TRANSFER TO:
TOTAL 10_75 ----- -___-_675 INTRA -CITY CHARGEBACRS:
10:75 10.75 286,337 VEHICLE OPERATIONS
'-j
�J
f �
I�
---------------------------------------------------
l * Asst Su t -
HICLE REPLi10EftNT 06,647
ADM ISTTRRAETIVENGOVERHEAD 51,118
CBD MAINTENANCE 48,210
0
TOTAL 185,975
========_
NONE
CAPITALOUTLAY:
0
TOTAL ----"'-0
• p . Solid Waste: 50$ of FTE is shown here; remainder funded in Landfill Operations.
**
Street/ Sanitation Supt.: 25% of FTE is shown here; remainder funded in Street System Main-
tenance and Landfill Operations.
I
150
i
BEGINNING BALANCE
TOTAL BALANCE
LICENSES & PERMITS
FOR
MISCE
MISCELLANEOUS
TOTAL RECEIPTS
PERSONAL SERVICES
COMMODITIES
CAPITAL 0 LAY GES
TRANSFERS
CONTINGENCY
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
'I ENDING BALANCE
CITY OF IOWA CITY
FYLANDFILLL OPERATIONS
FY86
ACTUAL
294,673
294,673
216
662,653
20,723
683,594
-187,202
-26,597
-245,629
-192,760
110,880
-763,077
215,190
151
FY87
ESTIMATE
215,190
215,190
----200
0
662,900
17,100
680,872
-185,745
-18,600
-181;490
25,000
1,111
-419,349
476,713
FY88
PROPOSED
476,713
476,713
--------200
0
685,000
17,100
----702,972
-196,741
-19,139
-255,780
-25,000
-9,000
_505_661
674,024
fr
FY88YOPERATINGCBUDGET
RECEIPTS AND EXPENDITURES SUMMARY
45100 LANDFILL OPERATIONS
JEXPENDITURES:
---- FY87 BUDGET ---- ---- FY88 BUDGET ----
FY86 ADOPTED REVISED DEPT PROPOSED
ACTUAL BUDGET ESTIMATE REQUEST BUDGET
PERSONAL SERVICES i
COMMODITIES 187x202 184,634 185,745 200,521 196,741 +
SERVICES AND CHARGES 26;597 18,600 18,600 19,139 19;139
245 629
CAPITAL OUTLAY 192,760 191'220 181;490 152,460 255,781
TRANSFERS OUT
CONTINGENCY 110,8890 --25,000 25,000 50,000 25 000
- 0 -_-_1,111 --------� -__-9_000
TOTAL 763,077 419,461 419,349 422,120 505,661
II aysaaaaoa aaa=asa=a aasasaasa ••
==a=asaam aev=aaazm '±
i
RECEIPTS:
FY86 REVISED FY88
ACTUAL ESTIMATE PBUDDGGETD
! LICENSES i PERMITS 200 200
LANDFILL FEES 662 653
INTEREST INCOME 62 653 662,900 685,000
MISCELLANEOUS -- r 2 17'100 17,100
TOTAL 683_594 680,872 702972
aaaaa_a=a a=aaa =____-___
F
152
al
fG
M.W.II-LANDFILL
M.W.III - LANDFILL
SR. M.W. - LANDFILL
* ASST SUPT - SOLID W
**ASST
S
TEMPO IES
OVERTIME
BENEFITS
TOTAL
FY88YOPERATINGCBUDGET
45100 LEXPENDITURES
NDFILL OP RATIONS
PERSONAL SERVICES:
FTE BUDGET
FY87 FY88 $
3.00 3.00 64,813
ATB 1.00 1.00 25,355
IPT .25 .25 23,905
3,780
__ _ ___ 4 _0 25_4
6.75 6.75 196,741
* Asst. Supt. - Solid Waste:
** Street/ Sanitation Supt.:
TRANSFER TO:
LANDFILL RESERVE
TOTAL
4i
w
25,000
25,000
a=as=aaaa
INTRA -CITY CHARGEBACES:
VEHICLLEE OPERATIONS
ENT 88,948
WORD PROCESSING 55,039
ADMINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD 44,188
CBD MAINTENANCE 0
TOTAL 188,175
NONE
CAPITAL OUTLAY:
M i
TOTAL0 r
------------------------
50% of FTE is shown here; remainder funded in Refuse Collection s�
Operations. e
25% of FTE is shown here; remainder funded in Street System Main-
tenance and Refuse Collection Operations.
153
G3 ''
CITY OF ION' CU"pyFT
FY88 OPL,M ACQUIS RESERVE
LANDFILL,
i
ACYTBUAL
BALANCE 204_506
BEGINNING �L*NCE 180353
TOTALy5 000
INTEREST INC01%pERATIONS-------- 40_353
TRANSFE�FRORECEIPTS -90
SERVICESQAND
-32
Lhy
CAPITAL �AL EXPENDITURES -----------
244,827
4 C='3933'=y4s
ENDING BALANCE
1
J
f
FY8
ESTIMA7TE
244,827
244, 821
25,000
----- U
--
�Seai
154
J
FY88
PROPOSED
282,919
282,919
-----13,000
-----;81092
---------- 0
------ 0
321,0_1_1_
r
tr
�i
BEGINNING BALANCE
TOTAL BALANCE
INTEREST INCOME
HANGAR RENTAL
FARM RECEIPTS
PROPERTY X TRANSFER
MISCELLANEOUS
TOTAL RECEIPTS
PERSONAL SERVICES
COMMODITIES
SERVICES AND CHARGES
CAPITAL OUTLAY
CONNTTINGENCY
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
ENDING BALANCE
FY88TOPERATING BUDGET
AIRPORT OPERATIONS
FY86
ACTUAL
_ 3,551
3,551
306
54,782
15,022
3,327
108,428
1,890
184,528
-41,579
-27,187
-91,160
-21;000
0
---_185_264
2,815
155
FY87
ESTIMATE
2,815
2,815
0
70,532
15,000
100,630
---1_ego
193,827
-41,954
21,760
-96,809
-33,000
531
-192,992
3,650
FY88
PROPOSED
---3,650
3,650
0
72,758
15,000
1031113
1_890
198,536
-43,735
23,770
-98,681
-33,000
-3,000
-202,186
0
1-- (3
3
e
CITY OF
IOWA CITY
- -
FY88 OPERATING BUDGET
RECEIPTS
AND EXPENDITURES
SUMMARY
46100 AIRPORT OPERATIONS
EXPENDITURES:
-'
-- FY87
BUDGET ----
---- FY88
BUDGET --
FY86
ADOPTED
REVISED
DEPT
PROPOSED
I
ACTUAL
BUDGET
ESTIMATE
REQUEST
BUDGET
=
PERSONAL SERVICES
COMMODITIES
41,579
41,423
41,954
43,735
43,735
SERVICES AND CHARGES
27,187
91,160
21,760
81,486
21,760
96,809
23,770
95,084
23,770
98,681
TRANSFERS OUTLAY
4 338
0
0
0
CONTINGENCY
21,000
33,000
0
33,000
33,000
33,000
_531
0
3:000
rf
TOTAL
_ _---0
185,264
_
177,669
----
192,992
-------
195,589
_
202,186
saveaaa=a
saaamaav
=a<sayseaa
- oaaaaaaa
_ aeaaaaaa
RECEIPTS:
b'
FY86
REVISED
PROPOSED
ACTUAL
ESTIMATE
BUDGET
?
I'
STATE GRANTS
306
0
0
17
INTEREST INCOME
HANGAR RENTAL
54,782
70,532
72,758
FARM RECEIPTS
15 022
15 000
15,000
J
FLOWAGE FEE
PROPERTY TAX TRANSFER
1084
108,428
5;115
100,630
103,113
MISCELLANEOUS
--27
1,890
1,890
1,890
TOTAL
184,528
---
- --5;115
--193,827
--198,536
3
e
AIRPORT MANAGER
TEMPORARIES
j BENEFITS
' TOTAL
al
YOPERATINOF IOWA CBUDGET
PY88
G
AIRPORT
46100
OPERATIONS
PERSONAL SERVICES:
_
TRANSFER TO:
FTE BUDGET
ABATED G.O. BONDS
33,000
FY87
FY88 $
TOTAL
33,000
avx==xxao
1.00
1.00 31,470
I.
41100
_
_____
____ 8,165
1.00
_--
1_.00 43,735
-
aaaxa
vasa aava:axxx
INTRA -CITY CHARGEBACKS:
.I.,
VEHICLE OPERATIONS
VEHICLE REPLACEMENT
10,973
ADMINISTRATIVEGOVERHEAD
10, 743
CBD MAINTENANCE
D
TOTAL
22,589
CAPITAL OUTLAY:
NONE
TOTAL
'j
i
157
G3
�'
I,
I .J
J
BEGINNING BALANCE
TOTAL BALANCE
INTEREST INCOME
TOTAL RECEIPTS
TRANSFERS
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
ENDING BALANCE
i�
t
CITY OF IOWA
CITY
FY88 OPERATING
BUDGET
AIRPORT, CAPITAL
IMPR RES
FY86
FY87
FY88
ACTUAL
ESTIMATE
PROPOSED
150,367
----150-3--
98,885
-----------
----106,149
150,367
98,885
106,149
_
8,518
------7,264
1111- 7_2-64-
8,518
-----------
7,264
-11111111--
7,264
-------'---
-60,000
1111-1111--
0
0
----_60,000
1111---1111
----0
1111-------
---0
98,885
106,149
113,413
vaasaaaasaa
aaaeaaaaaas
aaoaaaaavas
158
v
I
BEGINNING BALANCE
TOTAL BALANCE
TOTAL RECEIPTS
PERSONAL SERVICES
SERVICESIAND CHARGES
CAPITAL OUTLAY
_j CONTINGENCY
-.1 TOTAL EXPENDITURES
;I
ENDING BALANCE
FY88TOPERATING BUDGET
TRANSIT OPERATIONS
FY86
ACTUAL
-99,171
-99,171
801,734
109,171
119,467
2,656
67,072
446,573
364,246
341,959
-__-___--31
__!,!224!25
-1,106,339
23,793
-999,785
-1,337
50,000
0
_2,181_254
159
FY87
ESTIMATE
0
0
740,000
87,000
179,000
0
419,126
200,00o
380,077
-__-_1,000
_ 2,033,203
-1,116,136
-1,014,248
0
109,342
-_2_029,166
4,037
FY88
PROPOSED
4,037
4,037
725,000
87,000
179,178
0
320,000
511,793
----- 1,000
1,850,971
-911,994
11,483
-893,944
0
-- -36_000
__1_853,421
1,587
EXPENDITURES:
J
PERSONAL SERVICES
COMMODITIES
SERVICES AND CHARGES
I
CAPITAL OUTLAY
�i
TRANSFERS OUT
CONTINGENCY
�+o
TOTAL
Jj1
1v -
RECEIPTS:
c
r
TOTAL
I
I
J
CITY OF IOWA CITY
FY88 OPERATING BUDGET
RECEIPTS
TRANSITDOPE�RATIOUMMARY
NSS
-- FY87 BUDGET - FY88 BUDGET D
FY86 ADOPTED REVISED
PBU
ACTUAL BUDGET ESTIMATE REQUEST DGET
1,106,339
23,793
999,785
1,337
50,0000
2,181,254
aaaaausa
FY86
ACTUAL
801,734
27,516
109,171
112,656
67,072
446,573
364,246
341,931
2,280,425
1,016,136
1,001 000
50,000
2,129,439
aauaaaaa
FY87
REVISED
ESTIMATE
740,000
27,000
87,000
179,000
0
419,126
200,000
380,077
1,000
2,033,203
160
1,108,124 1,252,074
11 983
1,014,240 671,000
0 0
-10_9_342 _
ais2usa6 =0943 90=
FY88
PROPOSED
725,000
27,000
87,000
179,170
0
320,000
511,793
1,000
1,850,971
911:483
893,940
0
36_,000
1,853,421
-1
4F
i
FY88TOPERATING
BUDGET
TRRANSIT
47100
OPERATIONS
PERSONAL
SERVICES:
TRANSFER TO:
FTE
- BUDGET
NONE
0
FY87
FY88 $
TOTAL
-_--_---0
I
MASS TRANSIT OPERATOR
M.W.II - TRANSIT
23.00
14.00 202,539
!
I.
M.W.III-TRANSIT
A.M. OPERATIONS SUPR.
1.00
1.00
1.00 19,282
1.00 21,570
i
P.M. OPERATIONS SUPR.
TRANSIT MANAGER
2.00
1.00
2.00 47,757
1.00 21,590
ACCOUNT
ACCOUNT CLERK - TRANSIT
1.00
(PPT 2.75
(
1.00 37,499
2.75 46,004
INTRA -CITY CHARGEHACKS:
MASS TRANSIT OPERATOR
TEMPORARIES
(PT 17.00
14,586
17.00 311,656
VEHICLE OPERATIONS
OVERTIME
19,600
VEHICLE REPLACEMENT
491,874
5 233
BENEFITS
22,000
147_911
WORD PROCESSING
ADMINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD
1;100
TOTAL
-----
49.50
__ _ _
40.50 911,994
CBD MAINTENANCE
0
0
TOTAL
498,207
CAPITAL OUTLAY:
�a
NONE
0
;
----
TOTAL
-0
EI 3
aeoaaaaaa
i
4 i
161
4F
i
TRANSFERS
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
ENDING BALANCE
CITY OF IOWA CITY
FY88 OPERATING BUDGET
TRANSIT REPLACEMENT RES
FY86
l
BEGINNING BALANCE
ACTUAL
�.
TOTAL BALANCE
56_754
I
INTEREST INCOME
OPERATING TRANSFERS
56,754
88,141
BOND ORDINANCE TRANSFERS
1,592
833
6,900
TRANSFER FROM OPERATIONS
30
0
0
TOTAL RECEIPTS
0
0
795_
PERSONAL SERVICES
TRANSFERS
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
ENDING BALANCE
CITY OF IOWA CITY
FY88 OPERATING BUDGET
TRANSIT REPLACEMENT RES
FY86
FY87
FY88
ACTUAL
ESTIMATE
PROPOSED
56_754
88,141
95,041
56,754
88,141
95,041
1,592
833
6,900
6,900
30
0
0
0
0
0
795_
0
0
33,220
6,900
6_900
739
0
0
—2,572
0
0
1_833
---------------------
---�
'----�
---- 88,141
--------___
----95,041
_----------
---101,941
162
Ic
J
;
-;x I
�>Fs11
162
Ic
Ic
BEGINNING BALANCE
TOTAL BALANCE
PROPERTY TAX
INTEREST INCOME
OPETRANSFERSTRANSFER FROM ENTERPRISE FUND
MISCELLANEOUS TRANSFERS
MISCELLANEOUS
TOTAL RECEIPTS
SERVICES AND CHARGES
CAPITAL OUTLAY
TRANSFERS
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
ENDING BALANCE
FY88TOPERATING BUDGET
DEBT SERVICE
FY86
ACTUAL
FY87
ESTIMATE
_-_-487,594
420,340
_--_487,594
420,340
1,860,680
2,003,195
58,465
11,938
51,000
442,656
125,8140
0
O
200,000
0
_ 21499_562
_ _
_-2_867_02_4
-2,456,925
-3,229,721
_109,891
0
-_2_566,816
-_3_229_721
420,340
57,643
163
FY88
PROPOSED
57,643
57,643
2,660,618
40,000
11,928
20,000
655,211
150,000
0
--3_537,757
-3,595,400
0
_3_595_400
0
01
164
(O3
:l
CITY OF IOWA
CITY
FY88 OPERATING
BUDGET
DEBT SERVICE
FUND
SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES
GENERAL_ OB-
DATE OF
ISSUE
AM STANDING OUT
07/�;1/81
-------DUE
FY88------
Streets Improvements
PRINCIpL
INTEREST
Street Improvements &
*Sewer
06/77
3,015,000
650,000
325,000
S
28,600
Construction
Street Improvements 8
*Sewer
09/78
2,250,000
600,000
300,000
28,800
Construction
Street Improvements 8
05/79
5,500,000
2,500,000
'
500,000
*Sewer Construction
132,000
Multi -Purpose
09/80
2,570,000
1,600,000
`
200,000
*Airport Hangars
104,000
Multi -Purpose
12/82
2,700,000
2,000,000
250,000
*Airport Improvements
*Mater
11/85
4,700,000
4,250,000
164,100
Construction
*Special Assessment
450,000
305,825
Projects
Multi -Purpose
*Water Construction
BMulti-Purpose
8/86
6,350,000
6,350,OD0
350,000
*Water Computer Purchase
Sprin 88
'
397,075
g
1 300 000
TOTAL
�_
_60 000
1719501000
_213751000
1.2 ,400 220 400
122_
*These bond issues are abated by revenue
+IThis is a preliminary estimate
funds.
for
use in preparing the FY88 Operating
Budget.
164
(O3
:l
FY88TOPERATING BUDGET \�Q
TRUST & AGENCY, PENS & RETIRE v
FY86
ACTUAL
I
BEGINNING BALANCE
105,489
TOTAL BALANCE
105,489
_I _J
j
J
UNIVERSITY FIRE CONTRACT
INTEREST INCOME
--_-661,472
86,314
MISCELLANEOUS
111508
TOTAL RECEIPT3
—_—_-18_875
740,419
PERSONAL SERVICES
SERVICES AND CHARGES
—1,337
J
TRANSFERS
_-72,977
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
3331634_855
—709,169
ENDING BALANCE
136,739
I
J
J
_I _J
j
J
Oi
.,��',J A•hl��lFtib'Cu?�`rti$`q u . '::h .� `�1'(, ` I ,Y !'�`:
165
FY87
ESTIMATE
-_ 136,739
136,739
438,917
88,285
8,300
535,502
642,801
—729,301
_57,060
FY88
PROPOSED
_57,060
—57,060
757,208
94,465
8,300
0
_859_973
—97,500
696,690
—794,190
8,723
EMPLOYEE BENEFIT COSTS BUDGETED
IN TRUST & AGENCY FUND
CITY OF IOWA CITY
FY88 OPERATING BUDGET
TRUST & AGENCY FUND
SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES
ACTUAL
FY86
Police & Fire Pension and Retirement 636,192
Worker's Compensation 47,841
Unemployment Insurance 10,160
Police & Fire Retirement System Expense 14,976
TOTAL TRUST & AGENCY FUND BENEFITS 7091169
EMPLOYEE BENEFIT COSTS BUDGETED
IN GENERAL FUND
FICA 319,492
IPERS 203,744
Health, Life & Disability Insurance 501,943
TOTAL GENERAL FUND BENEFITS 1/0251179
ESTIMATE
FY87
642,801
49,00
20,000
17.500
729 , 301
339,857
221,636
561,613
11123.1106
BUDGET
FY88
696,690
68,000
12,000
17.500
794.190
378,978
239,210
535,768
111531956
EMPLOYER'S CONTRIBUTION RATE
Police Retirement 17.686% 17.686% 17.519%
Fire Retirement 29.535% 29.535% 30.724%
FICA 7.150% 7.150% 7.051%
IPERS 5.750% 5.750% 5.750%
Police & Fire Retirement - Contribution rate is set by the annual actuary study done on the retirement sys-
tems.
FICA - 01/01/86 the rate increased from 7.05% to 7.15% and the maximum salary increased from $39,500 to
$42,000, on 01/01/88 the rate will rise to 7.51% but the City has received no information about the maximum
changing.
IPERS - The rate remains at 5.75%; 01/01/87 the maximum salary changes from $22,000 to $23,000, and then to
$24,000 on 01/01/88.
166
4.3
�I
i
J
BUDGET
i
i
ROAD USE TAX
BEGINNING BALANCE
ESTIMATE
TOTAL BALANCE
146,513
ROAD USE TAX
245,683
INTEREST INCOME
ri
TOTAL RECEIPTS
(i
TRANSFERS
(�
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
_101000
ENDING BALANCE
� t!
1_803,034
a
—_1_647,510
i
—2,036_09_0
i
__1_862_168
6.yr
— --304,817
245,683
0
iAl@
l�
PY88TOPERATING
BUDGET
—
ROAD USE TAX
ACTUAL
ESTIMATE
PROPOSED
146,513
304,817
245,683
146,513
_—___-----
304
— ---_817
_ —
245 668383
1,787,520
294
1,793,034
__
1,780,407
_ _18_
_101000
10,000
--1_805,814
1_803,034
1_790_407
—_1_647,510
—1,862,168
—2,036_09_0
—_1,647,510
__1_862_168
__2,036,090
— --304,817
245,683
0
167
al
CITY OF IOWA CITY
FY88 OPERATING BUDGET
ROAD USE
TAX
ACTUAL
ESTIMATE
BUDGET
FEY86
FY887
FY88
$
BEGINNING BALANCE
146,513
304,817
245,683
RECEIPTS:
Road Use Tax
Interest Income
1,787,520
1,793,034
1,780,407
TOTAL RECEIPTS
18,294
1,805,814
10,000
1,803,034
10,000
1,190,407
99
EXPENDITURES:
Operating Expenditures:
Traffic Engineering
Street System Maintenance
542,036
558,650
621,986
_
TOTAL OPERATING
1,091,329
1,633,365
1 303 518
1',862'168
1,388,104
2,010,090
-
Capital Improvements:
Bradford/1st Avenue Signals
14,145
Benton/Sunset Signals
TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
4,1
145
- -
- -
26,000
26,000
—
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
1,647,510
1,862,168
2,036,090
it If
ENDING BALANCE
304,817
245,683
ryI
YI
6'1
168
n
!03-�
FY88TOPERATING BUDGET
FEDERAL REVENUE SNARING
FY87
ESTIMATE
_424_399
424,399
215,617
------ 5,500
221_117
-193,299
-193,999
451,517
V
FY88
PROPOSED
I
451,517
451_517
-_________O
____451,517
-451_517 {
x
i
i
Ii
i
-
FY86
ACTUAL
BEGINNING BALANCE
274,400
TOTAL BALANCE
__ -�-� --
274,400
L�
FEDERAL REVENUE SHARING
INTEREST INCOME
---�--� -�-
548,365
31,189
TOTAL RECEIPTS
____ --4
579,554
SERVICES AND CHARGESTANSF
-428_858
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
_
429,555
ENDING BALANCE
424,399
--
FY87
ESTIMATE
_424_399
424,399
215,617
------ 5,500
221_117
-193,299
-193,999
451,517
V
FY88
PROPOSED
I
451,517
451_517
-_________O
____451,517
-451_517 {
x
i
i
Ii
i
P.`
CITY OF IOWA CITY
FY88 OPERATING BUDGET
FEDERAL REVENUE SHARING
ACTUAL ESTIMATE BUDGET
FY86 FY87 FY88
b b b
517
BEGINNING BALANCE 274,400 424,399 451,
RECEIPTS:
Federal Revenue Sharing 548,365 215,617 - -
Interest Income 31 189 5 500 - -
TOTAL RECEIPTS STT '
EXPENDITURES:
Operating Expenditures:
Audit Expenses
Transfers:
Aid to Agencies
Micro -Computers Purchase
Transit Subsidy
General Fund
Fire Ladder Truck
TOTAL OPERATING
Capital Improvements:
Kirkwood Circle Improvements
Civic Center Expansion
TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
ENDING BALANCE
r4lyl
171,698
50,000
67,072
85,204
4,324
504'560
884
429,555
424,399
170
700
193,299
193,999
451,517
451 517
451,517
CITY OF IOWA
CITY
FY88 OPERATING
BUDGET
_
JCCOG
FY86
FY87
FY88
ACTUAL
ESTIMATE
PROPOSED
BEGINNING BALANCE
80,473
65,486
86,156
TOTAL BALANCE
80,473
-------177
65,486
86,156
CHARGES FOR SERVICES
_—_----__--
0
---------- —
0
LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES
FEDERAL GRANTS
50,449
56 , 712
28710
,
INTEREST INCOME
39 329
41,000
41,000
CDBG TRANSFERS
PROPERTY TAX TRANSFER
0
44,480
23 869
55130
15,102
MISCELLANEOUS
71,060
TOTAL RECEIPTS
PERSONAL SERVICES
135,076
_ 176,718
155,876
i.
COMMODITIES
—108, 957
—11,682
—126,006
SERVICES AND CHARGES
—1,045
—40,060
1
—1,170
—37,196
—1,146
—29,571
at
CAPITAL OUTLAY
0
0
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
--__150,063
---_156,048
_--_156,723
ENDING BALANCE
_--_ 65,486
86,156
85,309
—_
J
_,
d„
171
EXPENDITURES:
PERSONAL SERVICES
COMMODITIES
SERVICES AND CHARGES
CAPITAL OUTLAY
TOTAL
RECEIPTS:
CITY OF IOWA CITY
FY88 OPERATING BUDGET
RECEIPTS AND EXPENDITURES SUMMARY
55110 JCCOG ADMINISTRATION
CHARGES FOR SERVICES
LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL AGENC
FEDERAL GRANTS
CDBG TRANSFERS
PROPERTY TAX TRANSFER
MISCELLANEOUS
TOTAL
135,076 176,718 155,876
NOTE: This is a summary of all JCCOG (5511.0, 5512.0, 5513.0 and 5515.0) receipts.
172
---- FY87
BUDGET ----
---- FY88
BUDGET ----
FY86
ADOPTED
REVISED
DEPT
PROPOSED
ACTUAL
BUDGET
ESTIMATE
REQUEST
BUDGET
19,465
19,617
19,225
20,161
20,161
277
253
253
292
292
12,208
0
12,284
0
10,674
0
12,578
0
12,293
0
31,950
32,154
33,031
32,746
iZfii 9
_
i 3
_30,152
Q'3 -1
'3-1iJ3
iiii`3ii
135,076 176,718 155,876
NOTE: This is a summary of all JCCOG (5511.0, 5512.0, 5513.0 and 5515.0) receipts.
172
FY86
REVISED
PROPOSED
ACTUAL
ESTIMATE
BUDGET
50,449
56,712
28,710
39,329
41,000
41,000
0
23,869
15,102
44,641
55,137
71,064
480
0
0
135,076 176,718 155,876
NOTE: This is a summary of all JCCOG (5511.0, 5512.0, 5513.0 and 5515.0) receipts.
172
FY88YOPERATINGCBUDGET
i
55110 JCCOG ADMINISTRATION
V
PERSONAL
SERVICES:
�
FTE BUDGET NONE TRANSFER TO:
---
0
I
FY87 FY88 $ TOTAL ---'----
�
p �
TECHNICAL ASSISTANT PPD
i "ADMIN.
___
tttp pID' DIRECTORPD
.20 .10 11967
4,401
_ TEMPORARIES
BENEFITS
.20 ;20
1;068
TOTAL
----- ----- ----3,968
i
==_50 ==_50 =--20—,161 INTRA—CITY CHARGEBACIS ;
JVEHICLE
OPERATIONSs
VEHICLE REPLACEMENT
WORD
GOVERHEAD
50
1
374
CBD MAINTENANCE
0
0
TOTAL
424
CAPITAL OUTLAY:
NONE
!
0
TOTAL -----"'0
I
Technical Assistant PPD:
fd
-----------------------------;------------------ __
10% of FTE is shown here;
AR
remainder funded in Urban Planning
& Development and JCCOG Rural Planning.
Admin. Sec. -PPD;
(�
20$ of FTE is shown here;
remainder funded in PPD Admin.,
JCCOG Rural Planning and CDBG Metro
J ***PPD Director:
Entitlement.
20%
i
�►
of FTE is shown here; remainder funded in PPD Admin. and
CDBG Metro Entitlement.
0
173
/Y/..��rr1y✓y�u,J h nl J�� .
,f�'iM}�'
.0
4
EXPENDITURES:
PERSONAL SERVICES
COMMODITIES
SERVICES AND CHARGES
CAPITAL OUTLAY
TOTAL
CITY OF IOWA CITY
FY88 OPERATING BUDGET
RECEIPTS AND EXPENDITURES
SUMMARY
55120 JCCOG, TRANSPORTATION
PLANNING
---- FY87
BUDGET ----
---- FY88
BUDGET ----
FY86 ADOPTED
REVISED
DEPT
PROPOSED
ACTUAL BUDGET
ESTIMATE
REQUEST
BUDGET
55,436 68,448
64,020
68,432
68,432
291 315
315
414
414
16,287 9,0666
0
11,123
0
12,535
0
11,084
0
72,014 77,829
75,458
81,381
79,930
NOTE: Receipts are included in 5511.0 JCCOG Administration.
174
-I
PY88YOPERATINGCBUDGET
55120 JCCOG EXPENDITURES
i - , RANSPORTATION PLANNING
PERSONAL SERVICES:
IFTE BUDGET NONE
FY87 FY88 $
ASSOCIATE PLANNER
J TRANSPORTATION PLANNER 1.00 1.00 24,645
TEMPORARIES 1.00 1.00 30,243
BENEFITS 670
TOTAL
----- ----- ---12,8_74
2.00 2.00
68432
175
TRANSFER TO:
TOTAL
-0
iMTRA-CITY CHARGEBACMS:
VVEHICLE REPLLAACEMENT
WORD PROCESSING 300
ADMINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD 0
2
CBD MAINTENANCE ,920
0
TOTAL
3,229
NONE
CAPITAL OUTLAY:
TOTAL
0
V
EXPENDITURES:
PERSONAL SERVICES
COMMODITIES
SERVICES AND CHARGES
TOTAL
FY88YOPERATINGCBUDGET
RECEIPTS AND EXPENDITURES SUMMARY
55130 JCCOG, RURAL PLANNING
ACTUAL
I
BUDGET ----
ESTIMATE
L
j
BUDGET ----
PBUDDGGETD
'
FY88YOPERATINGCBUDGET
RECEIPTS AND EXPENDITURES SUMMARY
55130 JCCOG, RURAL PLANNING
ACTUAL
-- FY87
BUDGET ----
ESTIMATE
-- FY88
BUDGET ----
PBUDDGGETD
BUDGET
REQUEST
21,369
25370
6 370
7,208
7,208
X342
8 326
---- _r-_�
---- 9,961
9,961
342
247
247
_
30356
_ 36-027_
-------
---------
7,797
---------
7,797
=--16,710
-------------------------------
NOTE: Receipts are included in 5511.0 JCCOG Administration.
176
CITY OF IOWA CITY
FY88 OPERATING
NTURESDGET
55130 JCCOG, RURAL PLANNING
_J PERSONAL SERVICES:
FTE_ BUDGET NONE
FY87 FY88 $
* TECHNICAL ASSISTANT PPD __�30 ----- ---- __-_5,901
BENEFITS 1_307
TOTAL .30 .30 7,208
TRANSFER TO:
0
TOTAL 0
INTRA—CITY CHARGEBACKS:
VEHICLE REPLACEMENT 200
WORD PROCESSING 0
0
ADMINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD
CBD MAINTENANCE 0
0
TOTAL 200
CAPITAL OUTLAY:
NONE 0
TOTAL 0
30% of FTE is shown here; remainder funded in Urban Planning
& Development and JCCOG Admin.
177
V
b1
CITY OF IOWA CITY
FY88 OPERATING BUDGET
RECEIPTS AND EXPENDITURES SUMMARY
55150 JCCOG HUMAN SERVICES
EXPENDITURES:
SERVICES AND CHARGES ----3_061 --_-5,022 _---5,438 -- -5,566 --- 5,947,
TOTAL 15,564 19,890 33,728 35,869 36,250
-- FY87
BUDGET ----
---- FY88
BUDGET --
FY86
ADOPTED
REVISED
DEPT
PROPOSED
ACTUAL
BUDGET
ESTIMATE
REQUEST
BUDGET
PERSONAL SERVICES 12,395
14,636
28,058
30,205
30,205
COMMODITIES 108
232
232
98
98
SERVICES AND CHARGES ----3_061 --_-5,022 _---5,438 -- -5,566 --- 5,947,
TOTAL 15,564 19,890 33,728 35,869 36,250
CITY OF IOWA CITY
FY88 OPERATING BUDGET
EXPENDITURES
55150 JCCOG HUMAN SERVICES
PERSONAL SERVICES.
FTE BUDGET NONE
FY87 FY88 $
• HUMAN SERVICES COORDINATOR 1.00 1.00 25,043
J BENEFITS
_ _ 00 1. _ __ __00 ---3-0--,2-0-5- _ 5,
162
TOTAL 1. 30,205
179
TRANSFER TO:
0
TOTAL U
INTRA -CITY CHARGEBACKS:
VEEHICLLEE REPLLAACEMENT 100
WORD PROCESSING 0
ADMINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD 1'710
CBD MAINTENANCE 0
TOTAL 1,819
CAPITAL OUTLAY:
NONE 0
TOTAL 0
V
bl
'Ra
CITY
OF IOWA CITY
FY88 OPERATING BUDGET
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK
GRANT
SUMMARY
OF EXPENDITURES
q '
ACTUAL
ESTIMATE
BUDGET
'
FY86
FY87
FY88
b
RENTAL REHAB.:
Abstracts & Recording fees
195
750
750
r
Building Improvements
56 979
-ST f%4
.341250
5,000
32 250
_ff
TOTAL RENTAL REHAB.
'LK&
METRO ENTITLEMENT:
I;
General Supervision
112,995
107,000
100,000
Community Development Planning
271
10,000
10,000
_
Creekside Sidewalks
18,406
- -
- -
Napoleon Park Restrooms
894
26,860
- -
City Park Accessible Restrooms
35,477
- -
- -
N. Market Park Play Area
4,558
3,000
Terrell Mill Park Improvements
111
1,200
- -
Housing Rehab & Weaterization Loans
123,465
184,903
180,000
Elderly Home Services Coordinator
37,153
3,500
- -
t
Shared Housing
20,474
20,000
- -
Residential Accessibility Projects
3,149
20,000
- -
Systems Unlimited Group Homes
65,500
70,000
- -
MECCA Facility
57,930
115,000
- -
P'll
Goodwill Facility Renovation
202,968
127,000
- -
C'1
Domestic Violence Project
50,000
- -
- -
Mary 0. Coldren Home
8,033
Mental Health Center
755-
-
- -
Handicare Facilities Expansion
793
49,000
- -
Property Management & Disposition
313
1,000
- -
Mark Twain School Playground
- -
1,000
Crisis Center - Food Bank Facility
- -
156,500
- -
United Action for Youth -Synthesis Studio
- -
6,000
- -
Human Services Coordinator
- -
23,869
15,085
Curb Ramp Installation
- -
5,000
5,000
Emergency Housing Repairs
- -
10,000
- -
p
Housing Modifications -Frail & Elderly
- -
8,000
8,000
Youth Homes, Inc. Acquisition & Rehab.
- -
-
100,000
Benton Creek Drainage - Phase II
- -
- -
145,000
Ralston Creek Bank Stabilization
- -
- -
11,770
180
�7
-I
i
—ACTUALESTIMATE
BUDGET
FY86
F --Y87
FY88
V
Coffelt Place Youth Home Rehabilitation - -
Handicapped Accessible Doors -Parking Ramp A _
- -
13,000
i
Aid to Human Service Agencies =
1,000
Contingency
0
TOTAL METRO ENTITLEMENT 143,2
442 222
3733' 30
J
TOTAL CDBG
8001419
1 1 026 054
0 19§i
733,000 a
'9
r1
r
i
I
i7
110
-0
I
181
i
s
FY88TOPERATING BUDGET
CDBG, RENTAL REHAB,
182
-1
FY86
ACTUAL
FY87
ESTIMATE
FY88
PROPOSED
BEGINNING BALANCE
TOTAL BALANCE
-5350
__---_--535
'825
---'-------
FEDERAL GRANTS
'----------
--------825
- 0
TOTAL RECEIPTS
56,884
-------�---
-----35,825
----------
33,000
-----'-----
PERSONAL SERVICES
56,884
-------�---
----_35_825
_____33_0_00
COMMODITIES
0
0
SERVICES AND CHARGES
CAPITAL OUTLAY
_ 0
975
_ 0
0
0
TRANSFERS
-56 r 0
-34,250
-32,250
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
---------'
0
0
_--_-57,174
---_-35_
-33,000
ENDING BALANCE
__000
---_---
-825
--------825
-----------
0
182
-1
CITY OF IOWA CITY
- FY88 OPERATING BUDGET
RECEIPTS AND EXPENDITURES SUMMARY
81000 CDBG, RENTAL REHAB.
183
EXPENDITURES:
---- FY87 BUDGET ----
ADOPTED NI ED
---- FY88
BUDGET ----
PROPOSED
BUDGET
-'
FY86
ACTUAL
BUDGET
REQUEST
PERSONAL SERVICES
0
0
0
0
00
750
0
750
0
750
I
j.
COMMODITIES
SERVICES AND CHARGES
OUTLAY
195
56,97
750
34,2500
34 250
r 0
32,250
p
32,250
0
CAPITAL
TRANSFERS OUT
___---'-0
_______�-
---------
35,000
---------
33 000
TOTAL
57,174
35,000
aria=sass
a==— eoe—
---33_00
--
==aaae===
1
msaosaesv
RECEIPTS:
FY86
FY87
REVISED
FY88
PROPOSED
t
J
ACTUAL
ESTIMATE
BUDGET
56,884
35_825
33,000
---
FEDERAL GRANTS
_----i---
--'-- ---
35,825
-----
33,000
TOTAL
'_____-_--
56 884
183
CITY OF IOWA CITY
FY88 OPERATING BUDGET
EXPENDITURES
81000 CDBG, RENTAL REHAB.
PERSONAL SERVICES:
FTE BUDGET NONE
FY87 FY88 $
----- ----- ---------
TOTAL .00 .00 0
' vmaa samas aaav =aaa
it
rj
TRANSFER TO:
TOTAL —_—__ —0 r I
j
j I
i
INTRA—CITY CHARGEBACES:
VEHICLE OPERATIONS 0 I
VEHICLE REPLACEMENT 0 — I
WORD PROCESSING 0
ADMINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD 0
CBD MAINTENANCE 0
TOTAL 0
CAPITAL OUTLAY:
RENTAL REHABILITATION 32,250
a.�TOTAL — 32,250 i
r
i
a'1
I
184
FY88TOPERATING BUDGET
CDBG, METRO ENTITLEMENT
BEGINNING BALANCE
TOTAL BALANCE
CHARGES FOR SERVICES
FEDERAL
TGINCOME
CDBG TRANNSFERN3TATE
MISCELLANEOUS
TOTAL RECEIPTS
PERSONAL SERVICES
SERVICES AND CHARGES
CAPITAL OUTLAy
r TRANSFERS
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
ENDING BALANCE
V
PY86
ACTUAL
50,327
50,327
755,235
11,000
11,647
2,377
780,291
-139,380
-4,964
-394,375
204,521
0
-743,240
-13,276
185
PY87
ESTIMATE
-13,276
_13_276
1,004,330
0
0
0
0
_______
1,004,330
-130,022
-621,190
187,768
23,869
-991,054
0
FY88
PROPOSED
7
0
700,000
0
0
0
0
_700_000
-137,639
-197,527
348,175
15,102
-700,000
0
v
�I
J
i4
PY86
ACTUAL
50,327
50,327
755,235
11,000
11,647
2,377
780,291
-139,380
-4,964
-394,375
204,521
0
-743,240
-13,276
185
PY87
ESTIMATE
-13,276
_13_276
1,004,330
0
0
0
0
_______
1,004,330
-130,022
-621,190
187,768
23,869
-991,054
0
FY88
PROPOSED
7
0
700,000
0
0
0
0
_700_000
-137,639
-197,527
348,175
15,102
-700,000
0
v
EXPENDITURES:
PERSONAL SERVICES
COMMODITIES
SERVICES AND CHARGES
CAPITAL OUTLAY
TRANSFERS OUT
COPY
RECEIPTS:
CHARGES FOR SERVICES
SALE F GRANTS
CDBG TRANSFERS
MISCELLANEOUS
TOTAL
CITY OF IOWA CITY
FY88 OPERATING BUDGET
RECEIPTS AND EXPENDITURES SUMMARY
86000 CDBG, METRO ENTITLEMENT
FY86
-- FY87
ADOPTED
BUDGET ----
REVISED
---- FY88
DEPT
BUDGET ----
PROPOSED
ACTUAL
BUDGET
ESTIMATE
REQUEST
BUDGET
139,380
4,964
135,397
28,205
130,022
28,205
137,639
1,557
137,639
1,557
394,375
204,521
621,190
200,152
621,190
187,768
212,304
357,245
197,527
348,175
0
140636
--9-99,580
23,869
0
15;102
--743,240
___
700,000
_-991,054
708,745
__700,000 _
186
al
FY86
REVISED
PROPOSED
ACTUAL
ESTIMATE
BUDGET
32
0
755,235
11,000
1,004,330
700,000
0
0
_
11 12
377
_ 0
0
780,291
1,004,330
___
700,000
186
al
CITY OF IOWA CITY v
FY88 OPERATING BUDGET
EXPENDTUES
86000 CDBG, METRO ENTITLEMENT
PERSONAL SERVICES: TRANSFER TO:
FTE BUDGET JCCOG HUMAN SERVICES -- 15,102
TOTAL 15,102
bl
J
FY87
FY88
$
REHABILITATION OFFICER
1.00
125
1.00
1.25
26,934
35;502
* ASSOCIATE PLANNER
** ADMIN. SEC. - PPD
1,20
1.20
25;757
CDBG COORDINATOR
{
***P.P.D. DIRECTOR
TEMPORARIES
1,091
INTRA -CITY CHARGEBACKS:
BENEFITS
-----
3.95
-----
3.95
---26,415
-
137,639
VEHICLE OPERATIONS '
750
T�,
VEHICLE REPLACEMENT
WORD PROCESSING
6
7,3060
J
ADMINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD
0
_J
CBD MAINTENANCE
TOTAL
8,056
CAPITAL OUTLAY:
CONTRACTED IMPROVEMENTS
& WEATHERIZAT
182,218
164,755
+
I
HOUSING REHAB
CREDENZA
1 OFFICE CHAIR
200
1 CAMERA ---------
TOTAL
348,175
----------------------------------
funded but only 50$ of one FTE is shown
here;
* Associate Planner:
Two Planners are
funded in
Urban Planning & Development.
'-�
remainder
25% of
FTE is shown
here; remainder funded in PPD Admin.,
JCCOG
** - PPD:
Admin. Sec.
Admin.
and JCCOG
Rural Planning.
20% of
FTE is shown
here; remainder funded in PPD Admin.
and
***PPD Director:
JCCOG
Admin.
187
CITY OF IOWA CITY
FY88 OPERATING BUDGET
SECTION 8 EXISTING 6513.2
188
G3
4
al
FY86
*FY87
FY88
ACTUAL
ESTIMATE
ESTIMATE
$
$
$
RECEIPTS:
HUD Annual Contributions Contract
1,268,578
1,475,899
1,470,420
Interest Income
4,436
4,500
4,000'
Total
1,273,014
1,480,399
1,474,420
-.OPERATING EXPENSES:
Administrative Salaries
105,788
106,600
109,580
Utilities
1,211
2,000
2,400
Ordinary Maintenance & Operations
0
0
0
General Expense
49,007
56,066
66,445
Non -Routine Maintenance
0
0
0
Rent to Owners
1,114,108
1,288,410
1,277,100
Capital Expenditures
0
0
0
Total
1,270,114
1,453,076
1,455,525
OPERATING RESERVE:
Beginning Balance
130,190
142,042
138,890
Earned Admin. Fee Over Expenditures
2,900
19,648
18,895
Interest on Operating Reserve
8,999
5,500
5,000
Cash Withdrawal
47
28,300
0
Ending Balance
142.042
138,890
162,785
*Based on a budget approved by HUD. This budget
will be amended after January 1, 1987, and
before
April,30, 1987. Amended budget will utilize first
six months actual
expenditures, projected
six month
expenditures and include any increase that may be
received.
188
G3
4
al
CITY OF IOWA CITY
- FY88 OPERATING BUDGET
EXPENDITURES
65132 SEC. 8 EXISTING
PERSONAL SERVICES: TRANSFER TO:
- FTE BUDGET NONE
--' TOTAL
FY87 FY88 $
-T
k)
14
0
CLERK/TYPIST - LEASED HOUSING
HOUSI G.MANAGEMENT AIDE
;80
.80
2;75
16 188
315
',
1
l
r
CLERK/TYPIST - LEASED HOUSING
HOUSI G.MANAGEMENT AIDE
;80
.80
2;75
16 188
315
',
HOUSING SPECIALIST
2 75
56
HOUSING COORDINATOR
31,294
BENEFITS
TOTAL
-----
4.75.
-----
4.75
143,111
INTRA -CITY CHARGEBACKS:
-__------
_
VEHICLE OPERATIONS
2,475
0
VEHICLE REPLACEMENT
0
WORD PROCESSING
ADMINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD
0
CBD MAINTENANCE
0
e
TOTAL _2,475
CAPITAL OUTLAY:
NONE --------0
" .^
.y
J
TOTAL
I
--I
J
---------------------------'-
NOTE: Permanent full-time salaries
-----------------------------------------------------
are included in Administrative Expenses; employee benefits
are included in
General Expenses.
n a
b
189
a
R
� I
CITY OF IOWA
CITY
I
FY88 OPERATING
BUDGET
PUBLIC HOUSING
6513.8
FY86
ACTUAL
*FY87
BUDGET
FY88
ESTIMATE
I I �
$
$
$
OPERATING RECEIPTS:
Dwelling Rental
Interest Income
94,177
97,300
115,320
L'
:Other:, -Income (Laundry)
Total
5,476
1,915
4,180
2,280
2,550
101,568
103,760
3,500
121,370
OPERATING EXPENSES:
Administrative Salaries
Utilities
26,854
29,740
29,455
Ordinary Maintenance & Operations
2,869
33,426
3,170
5,990
General Expense
34,190
35,400
43,750
Capital Expenditures
2,162
34,080
42,730
Total
99.506
0
02,390
3,600
125,525
OPERATING RESERVE:
II
ri
Beginning Balance
Receipts Over Expenditures
42,062
413942
48,312
9
Payments Due HUD
70
(4,155)
@I
Provision for Reserve
Ending Balance
0
2.D62
0
1 370
D
4 155
46.948
d�,L'f-
44,157
*Based on a budget approved by HUD in April,
Public Housing projects.
1986. This budget represents a
consolidation of all three
190
�'
I i
.i
CITY OF IOWA CITY
FY88 OPERATING BUDGET
65138XPUBLICOH USING
_I
PERSONAL SERVICES:
FTE BUDGET
FY87
FY88 $
M.W.I-PUBLIC HOUSING
CLERK/TYPIST - LEASED HOUSING
HOUSING MANAGEMENT
1.00
1.00 161522
AIDE
HOUSING COORDINATOR
.20
20
.20 3,524
20 4,047
'
BENEFITS
.25
.25 14,076
8,408
_____
TOTAL
-----
2.25
___13_604
2.25 60,181
"9 al
iv
.6
-------------------------------------------------------------
NONE
TRANSFER TO:
TOTAL
INTRA -CITY CHARGEBACYS:
0
VEHICLE OPERATIONS
EPI ACEFMENT
0
WORD PROCESSING 0
ADMINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD 0
CBD MAINTENANCE 0
0
NONE
TOTAL
CAPITAL OUTLAY:
0
TOTAL --------0
JNOTE., Permanent Full-time salaries are included in Administrative Expenses; emp]oyee benefits are
Included In'General Expenses.
Ni
eC
r
CITY OF IOWA
CITY
FYBB OPERATING
BUDGET
SECTION 8 VOUCHERS
6513.9
FY86
*FY87
FY88
ACTUAL
ESTIMATE
ESTIMATE
(5 MO. ONLY
(11 UNITS
(INCREASE OF 5
1ST YR. 11 UNITS)
132 UM)
UNITS, 192 UM)
—
RECEIPTS:
HUD ACC
6,069
42,820
68,134
—
Interest
106
0
0
Total
6,175
42,820
68,134
OPERATING EXPENSES:
Administrative Salaries
0
3,115
5,800
Utilities
0
0
0
0
Ordinary Maintenance
0
713
0
200
850
General Expense
Rent to Owner
5,462
36,036
64,123
Total
6,175
39,351
70,773
i� f
*PROJECT ACCOUNT (See comments below)
x
Housing Subsidy Balance
34,349
37,818
37,581
Administrative Fee Balance
2,402
2,402
1,193
Total
36,751
40,220
38,774
OPERATING RESERVE (See comments below)
in
with
the Rental Rehabilitation Program.
This is a new program and currently
is administered conjunction
Unit numbers and dollars are small.
It is unrealistic to
break out the
administrative fee earned to the
many separate accounts. Therefore,
it will be charged to
salaries. It
is not anticipated that an operating
reserve will be established for this
program.
'+
*A Project Account is maintained at
the HUD Central Office
for each project. In essence the ACC amount
is credited to this project account
each year for 5 years.
The balance
in this account is available to
cover the following years expenses.
Note the account has
both administrative fee and housing subsidy amounts.
192
(Q
r
FY88TOPERATING BUDGET
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
ACTUAL
----397,296
397_296
1,871,113
37,500
3
__1_950,711
495,927
-605,303
409,544
332,100
0
__ __ _0
__1_842_874
505,133
_I
�J
( 4
YNY HA' iS'.l •1 -�
193
FY87
ESTIMATE
505,133
--__505_133
1,523,133
0
_- _1,000
2,574
-525,158
-125,061
427,600
0
6,224
-_1_635,903
491,804
FY88
PROPOSED
----491_804
_-_ 491,804
10;37--,0-2-7-
27,000
,677,02727,000
0
-- _1,000
_-1_705_027
-601,095
12 -427;540
-- -35_000
-_1_740231
456,500
_i
BEGINNING BALANCE
TOTAL BALANCE
CHARGES FOR SERVICES
INTEREST INCOME
MISCELLANEOUS TRANSFERS
GENERAL FUND - MISC
MISCELLANEOUS
TOTAL RECEIPTS
COMMMMODITIEONSRVICES
PISUTLY GESCATALOA
TRANSFERS
!�
CONTINGENCY
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
ENDING BALANCE
tw
FY88TOPERATING BUDGET
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
ACTUAL
----397,296
397_296
1,871,113
37,500
3
__1_950,711
495,927
-605,303
409,544
332,100
0
__ __ _0
__1_842_874
505,133
_I
�J
( 4
YNY HA' iS'.l •1 -�
193
FY87
ESTIMATE
505,133
--__505_133
1,523,133
0
_- _1,000
2,574
-525,158
-125,061
427,600
0
6,224
-_1_635,903
491,804
FY88
PROPOSED
----491_804
_-_ 491,804
10;37--,0-2-7-
27,000
,677,02727,000
0
-- _1,000
_-1_705_027
-601,095
12 -427;540
-- -35_000
-_1_740231
456,500
CITY OF IOWA CITY
RECEIPTSBANDPEXPENDITUURESESUMMARY
i 62200 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
EXPENDITURES:
FY86
__ -- FY87
ADOPTED
BUDGET ----
REVISED
-- gygg
DEPT
BUDGET -- __
w
I
�f
ACTUAL
BUDGET
ESTIMATE
REQUEST
PROPOSED
BUDGET
PERSONAL SERVICES
COMMODITIES
SERVICES
495,927
605303
518,934
674,848
525,158
548,365
546,365
ui
ri j
AND CHARGES
CAPITAL OUTLAY
TRANSFERS
409544
332,'100
125,061
427,600
564,308
125,061
680,155
121,192
601,095
128,331
., 1
OUT
CONTINGENCY
0
427,600
424,500
427,540
___ __ 0
_ 0
—6,224
0
0
35,000
=
TOTAL
1,842,874
1 746 443
_
1,635,903
1,774,212
1,740,331
i
RECEIPTS:
FY86FY87
ACTUAL
ESTIMATE
FY88
PROPOSED
BUDGET
_
CHARGES FOR SERVICES
INTEREST INCOME
1,871,113
39 765
1,598,441
1, 677 027
;m
^
MISCELLANEOUS TRANSFER
MISCELLANEOUS
37;500
23x1330
27;000
2,333_
1,000
1,000
TOTAL
1_950,711
__
1,622,574
1,705.027
3
i
� d
194
CITY OF IOWA CITY
FY88 OPERATING BUDGET
EXPENDITURES
62200 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
f �y
PERSONAL SERVICES:
TRANSFER TO:
_i
FTE
BUDGET
NONE
ERRVAN
1
TWO-TON
TOTAL
J
1
FY87
FY88
$
SNOWPLOWS
SPREADERS
M.W.III - PARTS CLERK
2.00
2.00
39,361
PORTABLE GENERATORS
jl
MECHANIC I
6.00
6.00
128,206
TRUCKS
BODY REPAIR MECHANIC
1.00
1.00
19,892
COMPACT AUTOS
MECHANIC II
2.00
2.00
44,762
RADIOS
MECHANIC III
3.00
3.00
68,703
TOTAL
SR. MECHANIC
1.00
1.00
26,437
g
SHOP SUPR.-E UIPMEHT
2.00
2.00
54,579
INTRA -CITY CHARGEE
i
R
EQUIPMENT SUPERINTENDENT
1.00
1.00
33,322
TEMPORARIES
572
VEHICLE OPERATIONS
W
OVERTIME
18,675
VEHICLE REPLACEMENT
BENEFITS
113,856
WORD PROCESSING
-----
-----
--- -----
ADMINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD
TOTAL
18_00
18_00
CBD MAINTENANCE
w
-548,365
P
TOTAL
f �y
CAPITAL OUTLAY:
2
ONE -TON TRUCKS
ERRVAN
1
TWO-TON
1
REFUSE PACKER
1
STREET SWEEPER
4
5
SNOWPLOWS
SPREADERS
2
AIR COMPRESSORS
2
PORTABLE GENERATORS
1
CONCRETE SAW
_
TRUCKS
2
COMPACTFPICKUP
-
2
COMPACT AUTOS
1
SUBCOMPACT AUTO
8
RADIOS
1
3/4 -TON PICKUP
TOTAL
195
Ns:
2,999
17,600
0
0
20,950
33,200
12,500
48,200
3,100
76,600
25,600
44,000
31,600
22,400
7,900
60,200
18,800
20,600
7,200
3,040
12,600
427,540
BEGINNING BALANCE
TOTAL BALANCE
CHARGES FOR SERVICES
INTEREST INCOME
TOTAL RECEIPTS
PERSONAL SERVICES
COMMODITIES
SERVICES AND CHARGES
CAPITAL OUTLAY
CONTINGENCY
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
ENDING BALANCE
F
CITY OF IOWA
CITY
tiC.
;I
FY88 OPERATING
BUDGET
"+
CENTRAL SUPPLY
& PRINT
,I
FY86
FY87
FY88
ACTUAL
ESTIMATE
PROPOSED
172,849
107,103
154,506
i
172,849
107,103
-----------
154,506
------�-_--
------'----
89478
92,012
108,033
8,,174
3,577
6,645
95,589
----114,678
-----97_652
-33,176
-34,835
-37,749
-22,445
-13,351
-72,450
0
_-26,566
-2,000
-
-128,072
-48,186
-109,520
_.
142,429
154,506
159,664
i
196
CITY OF IOWA CITY
FY88 OPERATING BUDGET
RECEIPTS AND E
63000 CENTRAL SUPPLY SUMMARY
dy
{ RECEIPTS:
EXPENDITURES:
ESTIMATE
PBUDGETD
i
ACTUAL
FY86
ACTUAL
---- FY87
ADOPTED
BUDGET
BUDGET ----
REVISED
-- Si FY88
DEPT
BUDGET --
PROPOSED
_
ESTI14ATE
REQUEST
BUDGET
92 012
PERSONAL SERVICES
0
_
3,577
6;645
W
COMMODITIES
SERVICES AND CHARGES
33176
221,445
0
0
34,835
22,555
37,749
22,555
37,749
CAPITAL OUTLAY
CONTINGENCY
72451
0
13,351
0
26,773
20,650
26,566
1-Y
0
0
20,650
---------
---------
No
I�
TOTAL
..
128,072
svaa-vaa
0
aaaaaaaaa
--------0
48,186
v=aoasooa
—_------0
107,727
a=aasaasa
----2,000
109,520
oaaavomv
dy
{ RECEIPTS:
mi
P
ESTIMATE
PBUDGETD
ACTUAL
_
la
CHARGES FOR SERVICES
INTEREST INCOME
89,478
8 174
92 012
108 033
_
3,577
6;645
W
TOTAL
---97,652
_
--_95,589
114,678
J
1-Y
197
f� r
mi
P
X43
t
CITY OF IOWA CITY
FY88 OPERATINTURESDGET
EXPEND63000 CENTRAL SUPPLY & PRINT
PERSONAL SERVICES: TRANSFER TO:
FTE BUDGET NONE
TOTAL
FY87 FY88 $
*DUPLICATING MACHINE OPERATOR .90 .90 16,885
OVERTIME _364
5__306
BENEFITS _ _
TOTAL 90 90 22,555
INTRA -CITY CHARGEBA
VEHICLE OPERATIONS
WORDCPROCESSINGG
CBDIlMAAINTENANCOVERHEAD
TOTAL
CAPITAL OUTLAY:
PADDING PRESS
3 PHOTOCOPIERS
COMPUTER OPERATOR CHAIR
TOTAL
k
0
i
CKS: —
0
0
0
0
0
0
425 1
-- 20,225 6'
20,650.
Duplicating Machine Operator: 90$ of FTE is shown here; remainder funded in Central Procure-
ment and Services.
198
I,
. ;
PROP 0 S E D
CAPITAL I M P R O V E M E N T S P R 0 G R A
—
�i
•J
M
(
F I S C A L
Y E A R S 1 9 8 8
- 1 9 9 2
r
I.6
r
I�
I
CITY OF
IOWA CITY ,
I O W A
I
J
CITY COUNCIL
William Ambrisco, Mayor
John McDonald
Darrel
Courtney
Larry Baker
George
Strait
Kate Dickson
Ernest
Zuber, Jr.
CITY MANAGER
Stephen J. Atkins
FINANCE DIRECTOR
J
Rosemary Vitosh
1lit
January, 1987 '
i
J
Introduction
Fiscal Policy
Program Summary:
CIP Schedule
CIP Funding
General Obligation Bond Issues, Chart
Abbreviations
Projects:
Map A - Parks & Recreation Projects
West Landfill Asphalt Runway
Scott Boulevard Park Development
Development of Ryerson's Woods
Napoleon Park Renovation
Parks & Recreation Complex
Lighting at U of I Softball Complex
Court Hill Park Development
Happy Hollow Park Shelter
Creekside Park Shelter
Fairmeadows Park Picnic Shelter
Willow Creek Park Parking Lot
Wetherby Park Parking Lot
N Hickory Hill Parking & Sidewalk
Resurface Mercer Park Parking Lot
Resurface Mercer Park Tennis Courts
Mercer Park Softball/Baseball Fields
Renovate City Park Tennis Courts
New Picnic Shelter in City Park
New Restroom in Lower City Park
Map 8: Community Development & Water
&•Wastewater Management Projects
Curb Ramp Installation
Ralston Creek Property Acquisition
Terrell Mill Park Riverbank
Ralston Creek Bank Improvement
CITY OF IOWA CITY
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM
FISCAL YEARS 1988-1992
TABLEO_ F CONTENTS
PAGE
1
3
6
9
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
0
�I
v
Nr
LJ
8
{ml
rj
Introduction
Fiscal Policy
Program Summary:
CIP Schedule
CIP Funding
General Obligation Bond Issues, Chart
Abbreviations
Projects:
Map A - Parks & Recreation Projects
West Landfill Asphalt Runway
Scott Boulevard Park Development
Development of Ryerson's Woods
Napoleon Park Renovation
Parks & Recreation Complex
Lighting at U of I Softball Complex
Court Hill Park Development
Happy Hollow Park Shelter
Creekside Park Shelter
Fairmeadows Park Picnic Shelter
Willow Creek Park Parking Lot
Wetherby Park Parking Lot
N Hickory Hill Parking & Sidewalk
Resurface Mercer Park Parking Lot
Resurface Mercer Park Tennis Courts
Mercer Park Softball/Baseball Fields
Renovate City Park Tennis Courts
New Picnic Shelter in City Park
New Restroom in Lower City Park
Map 8: Community Development & Water
&•Wastewater Management Projects
Curb Ramp Installation
Ralston Creek Property Acquisition
Terrell Mill Park Riverbank
Ralston Creek Bank Improvement
CITY OF IOWA CITY
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM
FISCAL YEARS 1988-1992
TABLEO_ F CONTENTS
PAGE
1
3
6
9
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
0
�I
v
Nr
Terrell Mill Park Handicapped Trail
Napoleon Park Parking Lot
Water Department Computer Replacement
Ralston Creek Park
Waste Water Treatment Plant
North.Corridor Sewer
Friendship Street Drainage Tile
Orchard/Benton Storm Sewer Phase I
Orchard/Benton Storm Sewer Phase II
Orchard/Benton Storm Sewer Phase III
Benton St. Culvert Replacement - Phase IV
Fourth Avenue Culvert Replacement
F Street Culvert Replacement
Park Road Storm Sewer
N Dubuque Street Curb 9 Gutter
Potomac Drive Culvert Replacement
Highway 6 Bypass Ditch Repair
High Street Storm Sewer
Map C: Streets 8 Sidewalks Projects
RR Crossing Signals: Kirkwood/Gilbert
N Dubuque Street Deceleration Lane
Benton Street: Riverside to Greenwood
Dodge Street: Dubuque Road to Governor
Rohret Road: Mormon Trek to Highway 218
Taft Speedway: Dubuque Street to Foster
Melrose Avenue: West High to 218
Melrose Avenue: Byington to Hawkins Dr.
Scott Boulevard
Burlington/Gilbert Intersection
Kirkwood Avenue: Gilbert to DeForest
Benton/Sunset Signalization
Kirkwood/Dodge Signalization
RR Crossing Signals: Kirkwood/Maiden Ln.
Clinton/Market Signalization
FY88 Sidewalk Assessment Program
Extra Width Sidewalk: Mormon Trek
Extra Width Paving
Governor Street Retaining Wall
Map D: Bridges 8 Buildings
Brookside Drive/Second Avenue Bridges
Burlington Street Footbridge
Pedestrian Bridge over Highway 6
PAGE
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51-
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
I
P1
Benton Street Bridge Widening
Melrose Avenue Bridge Improvements
Woolf Avenue Bridge Deck Repair
Mini -Greenhouse
Addition to Cemetery Building
Replace Cemetery's Storage Building
Domestic Hot Water Tank - Rec Center
Recreation Center Accessibility
Recreation Center Roof Repairs
Install Air Conditioning in Rec Center
Two-way Radio System Replacement
Public Safety Building
Animal Control Facility Renovation
Transit Fleet Replacement
Civic Center Elevator
CIP PENDING LIST:
New Bridge Connecting Governor & Keokuk
Landfill Replacement
Clear Creek Science/Research Park
Ridge Road & Dubuque Street Intersection
Airport Master Plan II
River Corridor Buffer & Trail System
Iowa Avenue Restoration
N Dubuque Street Sidewalk
PAGE
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
100
100
101
101
101
101
102
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
I. INTRODUCTION
Cfor a community apital improvement programming is the planning, coordination, and scheduling
riod of rs
vand ai
upon need. obi icydesire of public improvements
is
portance ofasuch improvements�to thedcomnunpty
City's ability to finance, n based
a
withied
as well as having the staff to design and y withinthehe nstrai is
theconstraintsof
tially, the Capital Improvement Program the
J Essen-
(CIP) is a legislative and management tool to facilitate
scheduling, planning and execution of a series of
public improvements over a five earprojects.
the
d.
The FY88-FY92 CIP is Y period. 1
a compilation of projects currently in the CIP and new project requests. Although
most projects were placed into the proposed five year plan,
pending list. Those few
_
projects a projects have been placed on a
generally were viewed as having a low priority for
One exception is the Wastewater Treatment
funding at this time.
Plant. Although it was included on the pending list, it
considered a high priority. , because future
time, to However
estimate the cost is
actions are uncertain, it is impossible, at this
or timing of the project,
j
II. FINANCING OF PROJECTS
The financing of the projects included in the FY88-FY92 CIP is detailed
Summaries of funding by sources
.1
on each project sheet.
appear in this front section,
funds other than operating revenue and The City strives to
secure and utilize
general obligation bonds to the maximum extent practical
utilize general obligation debt within the parameters
and
of the city's fiscal policy,
The CIP (Capital Improvements Program) was
prepared with the goal of minimizing the amount of general
obligation bonds issued prior to FY90. Debt service costs
the older bond
peak in FY90 and then start to decrease as
issues are paid in full. Much of this
issues, totaling $11,050,000, temporary increase
J
sold within the past 14 months.
is due to the two bond
Debt service costs for which property taxes are levied, net of the debt service on the
bonds, will increase in FYsc 15%
'
swimmin
over the FYal costs. Then, in FY90, costs will decrease by 18%.
Future bond issues and the scheduling of capital projects must be managed
property tax funding
!
at a more stable level from year to year.
to maintain the debt service
iThis
J
proposed CIP would require a bond issue of approximately $1.3 million in FY88 and
$1 million late in FY89. The graph at the
a bond issue of
end of this front section shows General Obligation (GO)
Bond issues by year and the issues proposed for the next five
property tax supported
{ M
years, based on this Proposed CIP. The
GO Bonds are more equal than issues in past years. The
scheduled to achieve this level
projects have been
use of GO Bonds. Furthermore, other sources of revenue
wherever possible for funding the projects.
are used
.i
t"
1
II1. FISCAL POLICY CONSIDERATIONS
,y
A concept of sound financial planning is critical for the success of any program whether it be public
or As
private. a result, the CIP is a determination of 1) the levels of capital projects and 2) the
sources of financing those projects. While determining the
4
scheduling of projects for completion
within the next five years, it was necessary to deal with the City's financial resources limitations;
both
those that have been established by State law and those that have been adopted as policy by the
CityCouncilas
sncile to future
lex expend nditurednt is
hlater limitation whihe
Couiaddressed tsefn97byheformal
r
adoption of a fiscalpolicy that is
aimed at controlling and regulating the property tax level for debt
service on General Obligation
Bonds used to finance capital expenditures. The 1979 revised fiscal policy provides a more comprehen-
I
sive method of financing the many capital projects which the City needs. Adherence to this fiscal
policy can be expected to the following
provide advantages:
1. Investors interested in City of Iowa City bonds can refer to a fiscal policy and rely on it in
making decisions on whether to buy obligations of the City and in determining the interest rates
that they will bid. A formally approved fiscal has
policy a strong bearing on the City's ability
to maintain and improve upon the factors which determine its credit rating.
2. The proposed property tax levy for debt service, on which there is no state imposed maximum limit,
can be
J
projected and regulated to either remain relatively stable or to increase at an even
controlled rate.
_
R
3. Planning for public improvements normally takes place over a period of years. Nearly always,
funds are spent for
_
engineering and right-of-way prior to the years in which actual construction
takes place. The fiscal policy can establish
ii
amounts of money which will be spent for several
years in the future for the best public improvements facility planning and make it
i
possible to
concentrate time and funds on those priority projects which can be financed and constructed within
the City's financial
limitations.
I ,
g
4. A very significant advantage of a formal fiscal policy is to demonstrate the need for additional
r..
revenue sources in future years by matching expenditures and indebtedness permitted by such a
fiscal policy against a much for
k
greater need additional public improvements.
t'
A copy of the City's Fiscal Policy follcws.
4'
c
F .�
z
1
I
FISCAL POLICY
ANNUAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES
I. BALANCED
The budget of the City of Iowa City shall be drawn so that estimated revenues and anticipated expendi-
tures are equal. (State law requirement.)
2. TAX CEILING:
The budget of the City of Iowa City shall be drawn so that tax revenue in the general operating fund
does not require a tax levy in excess of the limit established by State law.
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
I. DEFINITION:
A Capital
ahsnCapital items
relatively nntnature, building s, impoementstolad which are itededtoremainsattchedsuchasand
torm
drains, sewers and streets. Capital improvements have four characteristics:
(1) They last a long time.
(2) They are relatively expensive.
(3) They usually don't recur annually.
(4) They result in fixed assets.
B. Capital Expenditures - Those expenditures for public improvements and their preliminary studies
and the acquisitions of property or equipment for new public improvements. Capital expenditures
are expenditures for capital improvements and shall be financed under the provisions of this
fiscal policy and planned in terms of the five year Capital Improvement Program. Excluded from
capital expenditures are operating expenditures; those annual expenditures which are necessary to
the maintenance of the city, the rendering of services, and providing for normal operation.
2. PROJECT
Capital improvement projects for the five year period shall be analyzed for the following:
(1) Compatibility with the Comprehensive Plan.
3
r-7
t
FISCAL POLICY
ANNUAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES
I. BALANCED
The budget of the City of Iowa City shall be drawn so that estimated revenues and anticipated expendi-
tures are equal. (State law requirement.)
2. TAX CEILING:
The budget of the City of Iowa City shall be drawn so that tax revenue in the general operating fund
does not require a tax levy in excess of the limit established by State law.
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
I. DEFINITION:
A Capital
ahsnCapital items
relatively nntnature, building s, impoementstolad which are itededtoremainsattchedsuchasand
torm
drains, sewers and streets. Capital improvements have four characteristics:
(1) They last a long time.
(2) They are relatively expensive.
(3) They usually don't recur annually.
(4) They result in fixed assets.
B. Capital Expenditures - Those expenditures for public improvements and their preliminary studies
and the acquisitions of property or equipment for new public improvements. Capital expenditures
are expenditures for capital improvements and shall be financed under the provisions of this
fiscal policy and planned in terms of the five year Capital Improvement Program. Excluded from
capital expenditures are operating expenditures; those annual expenditures which are necessary to
the maintenance of the city, the rendering of services, and providing for normal operation.
2. PROJECT
Capital improvement projects for the five year period shall be analyzed for the following:
(1) Compatibility with the Comprehensive Plan.
3
Y.'
(2) Revenue source - A clear distinction shall be made between tax supported and self -supported bonds
(G.O. versus
..i
revenue bonds). All projects supported by revenue bonds must demonstrate ability to
develop sufficient income to repay their casts and
"
costs associated with financing. In addition,
proposed revenue sources shall be analyzed in terms of whether the revenue be
can used for the
proposed project and the probability that the revenue will be available.
(3) Compatibility with the City Council's goals.
3. MAXIMUM LIMITATIONS ON GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS:
The following two maximum limitations shall apply to general obligation bonds:
A. Debt Limit:
r!
L•
Debt incurred as a general obligation of the City of Iowa City shall not exceed constitutional or
statutory limits: 5% the
presently of market value of the taxable property within the corporate
limits as established by the City Assessor. (State law requirement.)
B. Borrowing Reserve:
A minimum of 20% borrowing reserve, or debt margin, shall be maintained to meet emergencies, and
if so used, the bonds be
shall retired as .soon as reasonably possible in accordance with the
provisions of this fiscal policy.
4. CEILING ON DEBT SERVICE:
Debt service, charges payable from the general
fiscal year. tax levy shall not exceed 25% of that levy in any one
'
5. FINANCING:
�I
As a general rule financing of capital improvements shall meet the following guidelines:
A. General property tax and operating revenues, to the extent available, shall be used for capital
project financing.
B. When general property tax and operating revenues are not available under the maximum tax rates
permitted by law or deemed
'
advisable by the Council, financing of capital projects and replace-
ments may be accomplished by the use of bonds as outlined in
Section 6 hereof.
C. Every effort shall be made to seek out state or federal grants or assistance to offset a portion
Of the cost of capital projects.
4
`I '
f
6. BOND ISSUES:
A. General obligation bonds - Bonds shall be of a serial type and general obligations to the
Iowa City. They shall have a
City of
maximum maturity of 20 years. The maturity schedule shall
for level principal amortization payments insofar
provide
as practicable.
B. Revenue Bonds - Revenue bond financing shall be determined after first reviewing whether the use
of revenue bonds could be more advantageous than
financing with general obligation bonds. Revenue
Bonds shall be issued in accordance with the following:
(1) Amortization of principal and interest shall require no more, including reserves, than
approved estimates will provide from next
revenues to be available.
)
(2) Insofar as possible, debt service,after the project has been completed and in operation for
one full fiscal year, shall be level within
practical constraints each year.
(3) All revenue bonds for public purposes shall be sold at public competitive bidding in accor-
dance with the requirements of Chapter 76,
Code of Iowa as amended,
The first fiscal policy was adopted by motion of the City Council at its regular meeting on June
This revised policy was adopted by Council
motion on June 19, 1979. 5, 1973.
,i
j
i
�i
Rp
CITY
OF IOWA
CITY
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM
i
FY 88 - FY92
PROJECT
CURB RAMP INSTALLATION
RALSTON CREEK PROPERTY ACQUISITION
TERRELL MILL PARR RIVERBANK
EE
RALSTON CRUX BANK IMPROVEMENT
TERRELL MILL PARR HANDICAPPED TRAIL
NAPOLEON PARE PARKING LOTS
MATER DEPT CORNIER REPLACEMENT
WEST LANDFILL ASPHALT RUNWAY
'
SCOTT BLVD PARK DEVELOPMENT
DEVELOPMENT OF RYERSON'S WOODS
NAPOLEON PARR RENOVATION
PARRS i RECREATION COMPLEX
LIGHTING AT U I SOFTBALL COMPLEX
COURT HILL PARR DEVELOPMENT
HAPPY HOLLOW PARK SHELTER
CREe1feIDE PARR SHELTER
FAIRMEADOWS PARK PICNIC SHELTER
WILLOW CREEK PARK PARKING LOT
MET7mIBY PARK pARRINO LOT
N HICKORY WILL PARKING i SIDEWALK
RESURFACE MERCER PARK PARKING NOT
RESURFACE MERCER PARR TENNIS COURTS
MERCER PARK SOFTRALL�/BAB88ALL FIELDS
RENOVATE CITY PARK TENNIS COURTS
NEW PICNIC SHELTER IN CITY PARK
NEN RESTROOM IN LOWER CITY PARK
PRIOR YES
6,173
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
FYBB
6,173
r
0
0
2!,970
0
0
275,000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
16,000
49,000
0
0
FY89
11 765
,
47,480
25,800
0
3,808
51,008
0
0
27,000
0
0
112,000
0
0
7,500
0
0
0
0
2,500
2,000
0
20,000
0
0
0
FY90
12,470
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,400,000
0
0
35,000
7,500
6,000
500
500
0
78,000
0
3,000
0
9,500
7,000
FY91
12,995
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2,000
0
]5,000
0
10,000
5,000
0
0
10,700
0
0
0
57,000
FY92 FUTURE YRS
17,405 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
8,000 0
55,500 0
0 27,000
25,000 250,000
0 0
0 120,000
30,000 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
(Continued)16
TOTAL
63,021
47,480
25,800
24,970
7,808
51,000
275,000
8,000
82,500
27,000
275,000
1,512,000
120,000-'"
72,000
38,500
78,500
6,000
10,500
5,300
2,500
10,000
10,700,]
41,000
49,000
9,500
60,000
'
1
ry
j
Y
1
-'
F '
i
�I -
I '
j
y,j -
61
EMI
m
1 ''
BENTON ST: RIVERSIDE TD GREENWOOD
i
CITY OF IOWA CITY
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM
FY88 - FY92
PRIOR YES FUSS
0 0
0 12,000
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 15,000
0 0
0 0
0 33,911,000
0 0
5,400 39,600
0 22,000
0 14,500
0 10,000
0 9,500
0 0
0 0
4,600 133,050
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 40,000
0 0
0 0
DODGE OTS DUBUQUE RD TO GOVERNOR 0 0
FY89
0
0
9,300
0
1,000
0
15,000
101,000
0
0
0
300,000
159,500
224,000
104,500
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
13,200
0
0
FY90
0
0
0
0
12,000
0
0
14,000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
FY91
5,000
0
0
6,500
0
0
2,000
0
0
27,500
0
0
D
0
0
0
0
0
5,000
0
0
57,200
0
0
0
195,000
FY92 FUTURE YRS TOTAL
0 0 5,000
0 0 12,000
0 0 9,300
0 0 6,500
0 0 13,000
0 0 15,000
103,000 0 120,000
0 0 115,000
0 D 33,911,000
127,500 0 155,000
0 0 45,000
0 0 322,000
0 0 174,000
0 0 234,000
0 0 114,000
0 270,750 270,750
0 270,750 270,750
0 0 137,650
84,000 0 89,000
0 39,000 39,000
0 394,000 394,000
0 0 57,200
0 0 40,000
0 0 13,200
0 303,200 383,200
420,000 0 615,000
(Continued)
7
fir'
I
(Continued)
PROJECT
i
MINI-CREENNOUBE
i
ADDITION TO CEMETERY BUILDING
-'
REPLACE CEMETERY'S STORAGE BLDG
_
DOMESTIC HOT NATER TANK - REC CTR
RECREATION CENTER ACCESSIBILITY
RECREATION CENTER ROOF REPAIRS
INSTALL AIR CONDITIONING IN REC CTR
RAISTON CREEK PARK
^T
WASTE NATER TREATMENT PLANT
NORTH CORRIDOR SEWER
FRIENDSHIP ST DRAINAGE TILE
ORCHARD/BENTON STORK SEWER PHASE I
ORCHARD/BENTON STORK SEWER PHASE II
-JJ
. I
J
ORCHARD/BEHTON STORK SEWER PHASE III
DENTON ST CULVERT REPLACEMENT - PHASE IV
4TH AV CULVERT REPLACE KENT
F ST CULVERT REPLACEMENT
PARK ROAD STORK SEWER
N DUBUQUE ST CURB i GUTTER
POTOMAC DR CULVERT REPLACEMENT
HWY 6 BY-PASS DITCH REPAIR
-'
HIGH ST STORK SEWER
RR X-ING SIGNALet KIRKWOOD/GILBERT
N DUBUQUE ST DECRIERATION LANE
BENTON ST: RIVERSIDE TD GREENWOOD
i
CITY OF IOWA CITY
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM
FY88 - FY92
PRIOR YES FUSS
0 0
0 12,000
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 15,000
0 0
0 0
0 33,911,000
0 0
5,400 39,600
0 22,000
0 14,500
0 10,000
0 9,500
0 0
0 0
4,600 133,050
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 40,000
0 0
0 0
DODGE OTS DUBUQUE RD TO GOVERNOR 0 0
FY89
0
0
9,300
0
1,000
0
15,000
101,000
0
0
0
300,000
159,500
224,000
104,500
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
13,200
0
0
FY90
0
0
0
0
12,000
0
0
14,000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
FY91
5,000
0
0
6,500
0
0
2,000
0
0
27,500
0
0
D
0
0
0
0
0
5,000
0
0
57,200
0
0
0
195,000
FY92 FUTURE YRS TOTAL
0 0 5,000
0 0 12,000
0 0 9,300
0 0 6,500
0 0 13,000
0 0 15,000
103,000 0 120,000
0 0 115,000
0 D 33,911,000
127,500 0 155,000
0 0 45,000
0 0 322,000
0 0 174,000
0 0 234,000
0 0 114,000
0 270,750 270,750
0 270,750 270,750
0 0 137,650
84,000 0 89,000
0 39,000 39,000
0 394,000 394,000
0 0 57,200
0 0 40,000
0 0 13,200
0 303,200 383,200
420,000 0 615,000
(Continued)
7
fir'
(Continued)
PROJECT
SUBSET RD: MORMON TREK TO HWY 218
TAFT SPEEDWAY: DUBUQUE ST TO POSTER
MELROSE AVE: WEST HIGH TO 218
MELROSE AV: BYINGTON TO HANKINS DR
SCOTT BOULEVARD
BURLINGTON/GILAERT INTERSECTION
KIRKWOOD AV: GILBERT TO DEFOREST
BMMTON/SUMSZT SIGNALIZATION
KIRKMOOD/DODGE SIGNALIZATION
RR X-ING SIGNALS: XIRRNOOD/MAIDEN. IN
CLINTON/MARKET SIGNALZZATION
FYEB SIDXWALX ASSESSMENT PROGRAM
EXTRA WIDTH SIDENALX: MORMON TREK
EXTRA WIDTH PAVING
GOVERNOR ST RETAINING WALL
EKOOKBIDE DR./2ND AVE. BRIDGES
BURLINGTON ST FOOTBRIDGE
PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE OVER HWY 6
BENTON ST. BRIDGE WIDENING
MELROSE AVE. BRIDGE IMPROVEMENTS
NOOLF AVE. BRIDGE DECK REPAIR
2 -MAY RADIO SYSTEM REPLACEMENT
PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING
ANIMAL CONTROL FACILITY RENOVATION
TRANSIT FLEET REPLACEMENT
CIVIC CENTER ELEVATOR
TOTAL
8
CITY OF IOWA CITY
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM
FY88 - FY92
PRIOR YRS FY88 PY99 PY90 FY91 PY92 FUTURE YES TOTAL
0 0 0 35,000 345,000 0 0 380,000
0 0 0 35,000 407,000 0 0 442,000
0 0 115,000 753,000 0 0 0 868,000
0 0 72,000 338,000 0 0 0 410,000
26,000 1,074,000 0 0 0 0 0 1,300,000
0 0 63,000 0 0 0 0 63,000
0 0 0 0 50,000 1,014,000 0 1,064,000
0 26,000 O 0 0 0 0 26,000
0 0 0 0 0 23,500 0 23,500
0 40,000 0 0 0 0 0 40,000
0 23,500 0 0 0 0 0 23,500
0 539,320 0 0 0 0 0 559,320
4,800 4,800 4,800 4,800 4,800 4,800 0 28,800
0 4,400 36,600 0 0 0 0 41,000
0 0 0 0 0 65,100 0 65,100
0 0 0 25,000 261,000 0 0 306,000
0 0 0 0 0 0 46,800 46,800
0 0 0 0 0 0 480,000 480,000
726,000 1,899,000 0 0 0 0 0 2,625,000
6,000 177,000 647,000 0 0 0 0 1,030,000
0 0 0 0 0 0 210,000 210,000
0 0 0 728,000 407,978 166,148 0 1,]02,126
0 0 0 0 0 3,043,000 0 3,045,000
0 0 0 119,430 0 0 0 119,450
319,800 397,500 270,000 274,000 280,000 426,000 0 1,967,300
0 0 100,000 0 0 0 0 100,000
1,098,773 38,783,]1] 2,742,761 3,831,680 2,206,273 5,611,0]] 2,487,500 56,781,333
z
r
PY92
I �I
TOTAL
i
0
0
JPROTECT
275,000
27,500
127,500
NATER DEPT COMPUTER REPLACEMENT
155,000
I
NORTH CORRIDOR SEWER
..
0
ORCHARD/EENTON STORM SEWER PHASE I
1
•:1
ORCH&RD/BENTON STORM SEWER PHASE II
III
0
JI
ORCHARD/BEN'ION STORK SEWER PHASE
0
0
BENTON ST CULVERT REPIACEMENT - PHASE IV
214,000
i
4TN AV CULVERT REPLACEMENT
0
0
F ST CULVERT. REPLACEMENT
~
N DUBUQUE ST CURB L GUTTER
270,750
,„
0
0
POTOMAC DR CULVERT REPLACEMENT
270,750
W -
RR E -IMG SIGNALS:, EIRKWGOD/GILBERT
84,000
0
N DUBUQUE ST DECELERATION LANE
DENTON ST: RIVERSIDE TO GREENWOOD
DODGE ST: DUBUQUE RD TO GOVERNOR
0
0
ROHRET RD: MORMON TREK TO HWY 218
19,000
TAFT SPEEDWAY: DUBUQUE ST TO FOSTER
MELROSE AVE: NEST HIGH TO 216
0
-�
MELROSE AV: BYINGTON TO HAWKINS DR
0
0
SCOTT BOULEVARD
11,200
I"
BURLINGTON/GILBERT INTERSECTION
0
I'
EIRRNOOD AV: GILBERT TO DEFOREST
J
NIRKWOOD/DODGE SIGNALIZATION
0
!
RR E-ING SIGNALS: KIRKWOOD/MAIDEN IR
F
s m/
CLINTON/MARIDrT SICNALIZATION
0
PY88 SIDEWALK ASSESSMENT PROGRAM
40,700
0
0
44,200
CITY OF' IOWA CITY
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM
GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS
FY88 - FY92
PRIOR YRS FY88 FY89 FY90
0 275,000 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 22,000 700,000 0
0 14,500 14,500 0
0 10,000 224,000 0
0 9,500 104,500 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 2,000 0 0
0 0 11,200 0.
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 5,250
0 0 0 1,500
0 0 115,000 412,500
0 0 28,800 115,200
26,000 716,200 0 0
0 0 61,000 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 2,000 0 0
0 21,500 0 0
0 42,740 0 0
a1
TY91
PY92
FUTURE YRS
TOTAL
0
0
0
275,000
27,500
127,500
0
155,000
�
0
0
0
322,000
1
0
0
0
29,000
-
0
0
0
214,000
'-
0
0
0
114,000
0
0
270,750
270,750
0
0
270,750
270,750
5,000
84,000
0
89,000
0
0
19,000
19,000
0
0
0
2,000
0
0
0
11,200
I"
0
0
181,200
187,200
195,000
121,000
0
118,000
51,750
0
0
57,000
40,700
0
0
44,200
0
0
0
547,500
0
0
0
164,000
0
0
0
744,200
0
0
0
61,000
_
50,000
1,014,000
0
1,064,000
0
21,500
0
21,500
�I _
0
0
0
2,000
0
0
0
21,500
0
0
0
42,740
(Continued)
4c
le
(Continued)
PROTECT
'GOVERNOR ST RETAINING WALL
BROGNSIDE DR./2ND AVE. BRIDGES
BURLINGTON ST FOOTBRIDGE
PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE OVER NWY 6
BONTON ST. BRIDGE WIDENING
NELROSE AVE. BRIDGE INPROVENCM
NOOLF AVE. BRIDGE DECK REPAIR
. 2-NAY;RADIO SYSTEM REpLACEWEENT
PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING
ANIMAL CONTROL FACILITY RENOVATION
TOTAL
10
CITY OF IOWA CITY
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM
GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS
PY88 - FY92
PRIOR YRS
FY88
PY89
FY90
PY91
PY92
FUTURE YRS
TOTAL
0
0
0
0
0
65,100
0
65,100
0
0
0
25,000
76,200
0
0
101,200
0
0
0
0
0
0
66,800
46,800
O
0
0
0
0
0
180,000
680,000
561,000
749,000
0
0
0
0
0
1,290,000
6,000
177,000
231,000
0
O
0
0
616,000
0
0
0
0
0
0
210,000
210,000
0
0
0
728,000
607,978
166,148 r
0
1,302,126
0
0
0
0
0
3,015,000
0
],065,000
0
0
0
119,650
O
0
0
119,650
6..2,..0. .....,........9.,00. .......
.......
.28 4,648,24 ,-........00 12,266.216
Wi
II
I
CITY OF IOWA CITY
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM
OPERATIONS
FY88 - PY92
PROJECT
IN
PRIOR YRS
FY88
FY89
PY90
FY91
FY92
FUTURE YRS
TOTAL
CURB RAMP INSTALLATION
1,173
1,173
2,235
2,362
2,469
2,562
0
11,974
TERRELL HILL PARK RIVERBANK
0
0
1,530
0
0
0
0
1,530
RALSTON CREEK BANK IMPROVEMENT
0
700
0
0
0
0
0
700 �
TERRELL MILL PARK HANDICAPPED TRAIL
0
0
608
0
0
0
0
608
NAPOLEON PARK PARKING LDTS
0
0
1,500
0
0
0
0
1,500
NEST LANDFILL ASPHALT RUNWAY
0
0
0
0
0
8,000
0
8,000
'SCOTT BLVD PARK DEVELOPMENT
0
0
27,000
0
0
55,500
0
82,500
DML40PNM OF RYERSON'S WOODS
0
0
0
0
0
0
23,000
23,000
- 'NAPOLEON. PARK RENOVATION
0
0
0
0
0
25,000
250,000
275,000
PARES A RECREATION COMPLEX
0
0
112,000
1,400,000
0
0
0
1,512,000
LIGHTING AT U I SOFTBALL COMPLEX
0
0
0
0
0
0
120,000
120,000
COURT HILL PARK DEVELOPMENT
0
0
0
0
2,000
30,000
0
32,000
HAPPY HOLLOW PARK SHELTER
0
0
3,500
35,000
0
0
0
38,500
CREEKSIDE PARK SHELTER
0
0
0
3,500
35,000
0
0
38,500
PAINMEADOWS PARK PICNIC SHELTER
0
0
0
6,000
0
0
0
6,000
WILLON CREEK PARK PARKING LOT
0
0
0
500
10,000
0
0
10,500
WETHERBY PARK PARKING LOT
0
0
0
500
5,000
0
0
5,500
N HICKORY HILL PARKING A SIDEWALK
0
0
2,500
0
0
0
0
2,500 i
i
RESURFACE MERCER PARK PARKING LOT
0
0
2,000
38,000
0
0
0
40,000
RESURFACE MERCER PARK TENNIS COURTS
0
0
0
0
10,300
0
0
10,300
MERCER PARK SonBALWBASEBALL FIELDS
0
16,000
20,000
5,000
0
0
0
41,000
RENOVATE CITY PARK TENNIS COURTS
0
49,000
0
0
0
0
0
49,000
CITY PARK
0
0
0
9,500
0
0
0
9,500
M' NEW PICNIC SHELTER
' NEN RESTROOM IN LOWER CITY PARK 0 0 0 3,000 57,000 0 0 60,000 j
a
MINI -GREENHOUSE 0 0 0 0 5,000 0 0 5,000 '
(Continued)
F1. r ..
(Continued)
PROTECT
ADDITION TO CEMETERY BUILDING
REPLACE CE ETERY'S STORAGE BLDG
DOMESTIC HOT NATER TANK - REC CTR
RECREATION CENTER ACCESSIBILITY
RECREATION CENTER ROOT REPAIRS
INSTALL AIR CONDITIONING IN REC CTR
RALSTON CREEK PARE
EXTRA WIDTH SIDEWALK: MORMON TREK
EXTRA WIDTH PAVING
.TRANSIT rLEET REPLACEMENT
TOTAL
12
CITY Or IOIVA CITY
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM
OPERATIONS
FY88 - PY92
PRIOR YRS
FY88
PY09
FY90
FY91
PY92
FUTURE YRS
TOTAL
6I
0
12,000
0
0
0
0
0
12,000
0
0
9,700
0
0
0
0
9,700
I j
0
0
0
0
6,500
0
0
6,500
0
0
1,000
12,000
0
0
0
17,000
0
15,000
0
o
0
0
0
15,000
L'
0
0
15,000
0
2,000
107,000
0
120,000
-
0
0
0
14,000
0
0
0
14,000
4,800
4,800
4,800
4,800
4,800
4,800
0
28,800
0
4,400
76,600
0
0
0
0
41,000
6 000
85 200
0
797,460
._
67,960 79,500 54,000 54,800 5 , ,
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
..-...9,97.7.....82,..7... 293,573 1,588,962 .- 196,069 314,6 797,000 7,6:8,172
REVENUE BONDS
FY88 - FY92
PRIOR YRS
ri
FY89 PY90 FY91 PY92 FUTURE YRS
TOTAL
0
33,911,000
0 0 0 0 0
�i
J PROJECT
IMPROVEMENTS
FRIENDSHIP 8T DRAINAGE TILE
__________ __________ __________ ________
0 0 0 0 0
PARR ROAD STORK SEWER
HWY 6 BY-PASS DITCH REPAIR
HIGH ST STORM SEWER
ROBERT RD: MORMON TREE TO HWY 218
TAFT SPEEDWAY: DUBUQUE ST TO FOSTER
FY88 - FY92
MELROSE AVE: WEST HIGH TO 218
CiJ
MELROSE AV: BYINGTON TO HAWKINS DR
PRIOR YRS
I I FY88. SIDEWALK ASSESSMENT PROGRAM
PY90
TOTAL
FY92
ITS
TOTAL
lel
39,600 0
0
0
0
0
1n
4,600
H
0
PRoserr
0
BENTON/SUNSET SIGNALIZATION
137,650
TOTAL
0 0
0
0
0
354,600
PROJECT
0
WASTE NATER TREATMENT PLANT
0
d
0
TOTAL
n
yl
0
p.l
29,750
297,250
0
REVENUE BONDS
FY88 - FY92
PRIOR YRS
CITY OF IOWA CITY
FY89 PY90 FY91 PY92 FUTURE YRS
TOTAL
0
33,911,000
0 0 0 0 0
CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENTS
PROGRAM
__________ __________ __________ ________
0 0 0 0 0
__________ I
33,911,000
SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
FY88 - FY92
PRIOR YRS
FY88 PY89
PY90
PY91
FY92
FUTURE YRS
TOTAL
5,400
39,600 0
0
0
0
0
45,000
4,600
137,050 0
0
0
0
0
137,650
0
0 0
0
0
0
354,600
354,600
0
0 0
0
57,200
0
0
57,200
0
0 0
29,750
297,250
0
0
327,000
0
0 0
31,500
766,300
0
0
397,800
0
0 0
320,500
0
0
0
320,500
0
0 47,200
202,800
0
0
0
246,000
0
516,580 0
0
0
0
0
516,580
__________
10,000
..........
__________ __________
689,230 43,200
......................................................................
__________ __________
584,550
__________
716,750
0
__________
354,600
__________
2,398,330
ROAD USE TAE
FY88 - FY92
PRIOR YRS
FY88 FY89
FY90
FY91
FY92
FUTURE YRS
TOTAL
0
26,000
26,000
0
_________
0
___--___O __________
26,000 0
__________
0
_________0
0
0
_________
0
-
26,000
REVENUE BONDS
FY88 - FY92
PRIOR YRS
FY88
FY89 PY90 FY91 PY92 FUTURE YRS
TOTAL
0
33,911,000
0 0 0 0 0
77,911,000
_________
0
_____----- __________
37,911,000
__________ __________ __________ ________
0 0 0 0 0
__________ I
33,911,000
CITY OF IOWA CITY
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM
STATE AID
FY88 — PY92
PRIOR YRS
PROTECT
PY89
k TERRELL HILL PARR RIVERBANK
PY91
RALSTON CREEK BINK IMPROVEKENT
PUTURE YRS
NAPOLEON PARK PARKING LOTS
0
HNY 6 BY—PASS DITCH REPAIR
12,500
AR X-ING SIGNALS: KIRKMOOD/GILBERT
-
i DODGE ST:. DUBUQUE RD TO GOVERNOR
0
SCOTT. BOULEVARD
0
RA X -IMC SIGNALS: XIRKWOOD/MAIDEN IN
0
TOTAL
0
PROJECT
0
RR X-ING SIGNALSt KIRKNO00/GILBERT
0
RR X—ING SIGNALS: KIRXNDOD/MAIDEN IN
11
1
TOTAL
0
0
I�
i
14
CITY OF IOWA CITY
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM
STATE AID
FY88 — PY92
PRIOR YRS
PYBB
PY89
FY90
PY91
FY92
PUTURE YRS
TOTAL
0
0
12,500
0
0
0
0
12,500
0
12,500
0
0
0
0
0
12,500
0
0
12,500
0
0
0
0
12,500
0
0
0
0
0
0
39,400
79,400
0
36,000
0
0
0
0
0
36,000
0
0
0
0
0
297,000
0
297,000
0
355,800
0
0
0
0
0
355,800
0
36,000
0
0
0
0
0
36,000
----------------;---
0
------;---
440,300
----------
25,000
----------
0
----------
0
297,000
--------------------
39,400 801,700
CONTRIBUTIONS
PYBB - FY92
PRIOR YRS
PYBB
PYB9
FY90
FY91
FY92
FUTURE YRS
TOTAL
0
2,000
0
0
0
0
0
2,000
0 ---'
2-000
O
O
U
2,000
-------'
0
-------`
4,000
-------'
0
-------'
0
-------'
0
0
-------' — ----
0
4,000
-1
FY88 FY89
5,000 9,530
0 47,480
0 11,770
11,770 0
0 3,200
0 37,008
0 101,000
0 145,000
0 100,000
16,770 454,988
PY90
FY91
PY92
FUTURE YES
PROTECT
PRIOR YRS
jyp jjjHHH�I
CURB RAMP INSTALLATION
5,000
$ I+7
CITY OF IOWA CITY
0
i{
TERRELL MILL PARK RIVERBANK
0
,04
1
0
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM
RALSTON CREEK BANK IMPROVEMENT
0
u
0
0
11,770
I
0
PEOBRAL AID
NAPOLEON PARK PARKING LOTS
0
0
RALSTON CREEK PARK
0
.
ORCHARD/BENTON STORM SEWER PHASE II
0
PY88 - PY92
CIVIC CENTER ELEVATOR
0
101,000
TOTAL
5,000
0
0
PROTECT
PRIOR YRS PY88 PY89
PY90
PY91
PY92
FUTURE YRS
TOTAL
----------
526
02
.....................
BROOKSIDE DR./2ND AVE. BRIDGES
0 0 0
0
204,800
0
0
204,800
lBENTON
ST. BRIDGE WIDENING
185,000 1,150,000 0
0
0
0
0
1,335,000
J
MELROSE AVE. BRIDGE IMPROVEMENTS
0 0 616,000
0
0
0
0
616,000
iTRANSIT
FLEET REPLACEMENT
255,840 318,000 216,000
219,200
224,000
340,800
0
1,573,840
i
i..,
----------------------"'---------------
----------
----------
----------
----------
TOTAL
440,840 1,468,000 832,000
219,200
428,800
340,800
0
3,729,640
COMMUNITY REVEL. BLOCK GRANTS
FYSS - PY92
FY88 FY89
5,000 9,530
0 47,480
0 11,770
11,770 0
0 3,200
0 37,008
0 101,000
0 145,000
0 100,000
16,770 454,988
PY90
FY91
PY92
FUTURE YES
PROTECT
PRIOR YRS
jyp jjjHHH�I
CURB RAMP INSTALLATION
5,000
$ I+7
RALSTON CREEK PROPERTY ACQUISITION
0
i{
TERRELL MILL PARK RIVERBANK
0
,04
0
0
t M
RALSTON CREEK BANK IMPROVEMENT
0
u
0
0
11,770
TERRELL MILL PARK HANDICAPPED TRAIL
0
0
NAPOLEON PARK PARKING LOTS
0
0
RALSTON CREEK PARK
0
-�
ORCHARD/BENTON STORM SEWER PHASE II
0
- J
CIVIC CENTER ELEVATOR
0
101,000
TOTAL
5,000
0
0
145,000
0
0
0
0
100,000
------ ----------
10,068
..........10........1..9
----------
526
02
.....................
---------- ----------
0
508,25
FY88 FY89
5,000 9,530
0 47,480
0 11,770
11,770 0
0 3,200
0 37,008
0 101,000
0 145,000
0 100,000
16,770 454,988
PY90
FY91
PY92
FUTURE YES
TOTAL
10,060
10,526
10,923
0
51,047
0
0
0
0
47,480
0
0
0
0
11,770
0
0
0
0
11,770
0
0
0
0
3,200
0
0
0
0
37,000
0
0
0
0
101,000
0
0
0
0
145,000
0
0
0
0
100,000
------ ----------
10,068
..........10........1..9
----------
526
02
.....................
---------- ----------
0
508,25
15
ell
0
7-
6 -
BONDS ISSUED
IN MILLIONS
5-
4-
0
2 -
DD
CITY OF IOWA CTIY
GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND ISSUES
ru n ra ry nu 31 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92
FISCAL YEARS
16
tid for with
ix.
iid for with
xes and subject
PProval .
ated by enter -
revenues,
assessment.
_ The following abbreviations which appear on the project listings indicate the source of funding:
GO = General Obligation Bonds
SP = Special Assessments
OP = Operations
CO = Contributions
RU = Road Use Tax
RB = Revenue Bonds
FA = Federal Aid
SA = State Aid
HC = Housing & Community Development Act
(Community Development Block Grant)
17
-1
is c
d�"
WEST
LANDFILL ASPHALT
RUNWAY
REFERENCE MAP A /1
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This is a new project to construct a 40'
by 200' asphalt
strip for model
airplane enthusiasts at the
Aero -Hawks Club. The project was requested
by the Aero -Hawks;
currently they
use a grass
air strip.
{
I
FUTURE YEAR BUDGET IMPACTS
j
No maintenance costs are anticipated.
I
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE
Beginning
Finishing
Source of
i . .
What will be done?
Date
Date
E
Funding
I
.1
Before FY88
FY88
}
FY89
J
FY90
FY91
FY92 Construction
June 1992
July 1992
8,000
OP
i
After FY92
J
TOTAL
0,000
d�"
SCOTT BOULEVARD PARK DEVELOPMENT
REFERENCE MAP A A2
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT tl�
This is a new project providing a parking lot, a restroom -shelter facility, and play equipment. This park
� I
is used extensively for soccer, yet has no off-street parking, no restroom facility, and no playground
equipment.
I
Funding will come from operations, monies available in the Parkland Acquisition Reserve. —
FUTURE YEAR BUDGET IMPACTS
y costs will be added for the restroom -shelter facility.
Maintenance will be done by current staff; utilit
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE
What will be done?
Before FY88
Beginning
Date
FY88
FY89 Design & Construction (Parking) July 1988
FY90
FY91
FY92 Design & Construction (Remainder) July 1991
After FY92
20
TOTAL
Finishing
Source of
j
Date
E
Funding
i
Oct. 1988
27,000
OP
June 1992
55,500
OP
82_500
{
t+•
li.
li
4;
ni
i
i
REFERENCE MAP A f3
DEVELOPMENT OF RYERSON'S WOODS
J DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This project provides access, parking, trails and a small shelter for Ryerson's Woods. It is the City's
newest parkland acquisition, and there appears to be considerable interest in its development in order to
provide public access, and yet maintain its natural state. I
Operating monies would fund this project; City crews would do the work. i
FUTURE YEAR BUDGET IMPACTS
Maintenance costs will be added. i
�} IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE
}I I
What will be done?
1y Before FY88
FY88
FY89
y' FY90
FY91
FY92
_i After FY92 Design and construction
TOTAL
ki
Beginning
Date
July 1992
Finishing Source of
Date E Funding
June 1993 23,000
23,000
21
OP
I
j"K
fl
NAPOLEON PARK RENOVATION
REFERENCE NAPA 14
. ,
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
2i
This project was submitted by the Parks
monds into a four field complex to
and Recreation Department to redesign the existing softball dia-
i
girls' softball standards and dimensions, completewith fencing, back-
stops, bleachers, drinking fountains, landscaping, and parking improvements.
improper
I
slope, very little fencing, no
problem is the layout
Currently, the fields have
drinking fountains, and poor parking arrangements,
{
'9
of the fields, for
at another field. The fields need to
The primary
example, one field is situated so that the team at bat is hitting
"wagon
be
in a wheel" formation.
Operating monies would fund this project
was submitted to Committee on Community Needs
(see also, the project titled Napoleon Park Parkins Lots, which
(CCN) for
i
CDBG monies).
_
I
FUTURE YEAR BUDGET IMPACTS
7 -
Maintenance
Maintenance costs should stay the same.
i
II U ENTATION SCHEDULE
—
What will be done?
Beginning Finishing Source of
Date
Date ; Funding
Before FY88
FY88
FY89.
FY90
FY91
FY92 Design
After FY92 Construction
July 1991 Feb. 1992 25,000 Op
G
April 1992 Sept. 1992 250,000 OP
TOTAL
275,000
'
22
YI ,
I
PARKS AND RECREATION COMPLEX
REFERENCE MAP A /5 (on proposed location of new Wastewater Treatment Plant)
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This project develops an outdoor parks and recreation complex adjacent to the new treatment plant. Primary
focus of the complex will be high quality softball and soccer facilities, complete with lighting, fencing,
backstops, bleachers, restrooms, parking, concession building, maintenance building, irrigation system,
press boxes and all the associated features. The complex will also include park/playground area(s) with
associated equipment and facilities. The City's softball facilities are inadequate In number, and poor
quality. The soccer "facilities" are spread throughout the City, and none of them are good quality playing
fields. Both programs are growing, and the need for new facilities is becoming more and more evident.
Scheduling problems abound, and many complaints are received about the quality of the facilities.
The Parks and Recreation Department's goal is to provide top quality facilities for participants, and
several projects are interrelated to accomplish this goal.
1. With the construction of this new complex, plus lighting the U of I complex, both the number and
quality of adult softball facilities should be satisfactory for a number of years to come.
2. Renovation of Napoleon Park, primarily for girls' softball, will not only provide a much improved
facility, but will also eliminate many scheduling problems, and will vastly reduce potential liabil-
ity.
3. The improvements to Mercer Park will provide much improved conditions for Babe Ruth baseball and girls'
softball, and will eliminate severe scheduling problems. It will also reduce potential liability, and
many, many "disputes" regarding baseball vs. softball priorities.
Funding is designated as operations.
FUTURE YEAR BUDGET IMPACTS
A complex of this magnitude will definitely have a financial impact, particularly in daily maintenance and
utilities. An operating budget has not been established, as yet, but it is anticipated that a substantial
portion of the costs will be recovered through softball fees (and possibly soccer fees).
IWLFAEBFATIOB SO WAW
What Y1II be done?
Iefore F188
FY89 0:111911
F190 construction
FY91
FY92
After FY92
TOTAL
Wnninp Finishing Source of
Date Date f Funding
July 1988
July 1989
April 1989 112,000 OF
Oct. 1909 1,800,000 0p
l.su,opp
23
al
-V
LIGHTING AT U OF I SOFTBALL COMPLEX
REFERENCE MAP A /6
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This is a new project in a cooperative effort to light the University of Iowa's softball diamonds for join
usage of their facility, The City is lackingin
are adequate must be shared with Babe Ruth and Girls' Softball. The University's complex is a first class a
quality softball facilities, and those facilities which
extensiveocooperative relatiolnship could beuenteredn
evening per week. If the City would install lights, an
This project is interrelated with three other proposed projects:
I. New Parks and Recreation Complex; I{
2.Mercer Park Softball/Baseball Field Development; _ f
3.
Napoleon Park Renovation,
Funding is designated as operations.
FUTURE YEAR BUDGET IMPACTS
There will be an increase in electrical costs, but it is anticipated that these costs will be covered
through increased softball entry fees.
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE
Beginning What will 9 g Finishing
�e Source of
Before FY88 Date S Funding '
FY89
FY90 h
FY91
FY92
After FY92 Installation
TOTAL
Aug. 1992 Oct, 1992 12� OP
�1 .r
120_000 41
24
e�
I
I
REFERENCE MAP A /7
i_
COURT HILL PARK DEVELOPMENT
V
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This, is a new project to construct
a small parking lot and
restroom facility in Court Hill Park off
Friendship Street. There is no off-street
access for park users and no restroom available. The park has
four picnic shelters which would be used considerably more if the above improvements were done.
i
FUTURE YEAR BUDGET IMPACTS
Utility costs for a restroom would be
added. Maintenance would
remain about the same.
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE
Beginning
Finishing Source of
What will be done?
_Date
Date E Funding
Before FY88
FY88
FY89
FY90
FY91 Design
Feb. 1991
May 1991 2,000 OP
FY92 Construction
July 1991
Sept. 1991 30,000 OP
After FY92
TOTAL
32,000
}�
25
V
REFERENCE MAP A 18
HAPPY HOLLOW PARK SHELTER
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This is a new project constructing
structure. The project
structure a new Picnic shelter with restroom facilities to
strut
difficult to maintain because is in Poor condition
order to keep of its deterioration having been built in the late ace the existing
P it operational. what's more, it should be rebuilt 1940's.
Operating It is
9 funds would finance this project, and remodeled in
FUTURE YEAR BUDGET IMPACTS
Maintenance costs should decrease with a new structure.
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE
What �w{11 b= Beginning Finishin
Before FY88
FY88
FY89 Design
FY90 Construction & Furnishings
FY91
FY92
After FY92
26
TOTAL
Date Date Source of
$ Fun --ding
Jan. 1989 May 1989
July 1989 Oct. 1989 3,500 OP
35,000 OP
38,500
-I
_ CREEKSIDE PARK SHELTER
REFERENCE MAP A /9
I
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This is a new project constructing.a new picnic shelter with restroom facilities to replace the existing
structure. The existing structure is in poor condition, having been built in the late 1940's. It is
difficult to maintain because of its deterioration; what's more, it should be rebuilt and remodeled in
order to keep it operational.
a> Operating funds would finance this project.
iy l8
3 FUTURE YEAR BUDGET IMPACTS
{� 19 Maintenance costs shou.ld decrease with a new structure.
;~+
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE
�Y
{ What will be done? Beginning
u Date
Before FY88
h FY88
r FY89
A FY9D
FY91 Design Jan. 1989
rl After FY92 Construction & Furnishings July 1989
Finishing Source of
Date S Funding
May 1989 3,500 OP
Oct. 1989 35,000 OP
38,500
FAIRMEADOWS PARK SHELTER
REFERENCE MAP A t10
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This is a new project to erect a small picnic shelter with a drinking fountain. This park is in a densely
populated area of families with small children and is adjacent to Grant Wood Elementary School. There is
an apparent need for such a facility as the playground is heavily used. It is the only major small park
that does not have a picnic shelter.
Operating monies will fund this project.
FUTURE YEAR BUDGET IMPACTS
Some maintenance costs will be incurred.
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE
Beginning
What will be done? Date
Before FY88
FY88
FY89
FY90 Construction July 1989
FY91
FY92
After FY92
28
TOTAL
Finishing Source of
Date i Funding
Aug. 1989 6,000 OP
6,000
114
WILLOW CREEK PARK PARKING LOT
REFERENCE MAP A !11
. ...................... ..........
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This is a new project to install approximately 50 off-street parking spaces on Teg Drive. This park is in
a densely populated area and is heavily used. There is no place to park except along the street and this
creates a safety hazard for pedestrians, especially on weekends when the soccer fields are in use.
Operating monies will fund this project.
FUTURE YEAR BUDGET IMPACTS
Maintenance costs should be minimal.
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE
What will be done?
Before FY88
FY88
FY89
FY90 Design
FY91 Construction
FY92
After FY92
TOTAL
Beginning Finishing Source of
Date Date E Funding
Jan. 1990 May 1990 500 OP
July 1990 Aug. 1990 10,000 OP
10,500
30
TOTAL
WETHERBY
PARK PARKING
LOT
i
REFERENCE MAP A #12
1
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
`1
This is a new project to expand the parking lot
to accommodate approximately
30 vehicles and provide a
better surface on the existing lot. More parking
spaces are
needed for weekend
users.
The park is used by
gardeners, soccer teams, softball players, picnickers,
etc.
Also, the current surface
is deteriorating.
monies will fund this project.
►�(Operating
FUTURE YEAR BUDGET IMPACTS
Maintenance costs will remain the same.
_ I f
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE
Beginning
Finishing
Source of
What will be done?
Date
Date
;
Funding
_.
Before FY88
FY88
FY89
—
FY90 Design
Jan. 1990
May 1990
500
OP
FY91 Construction
July 1990
July 1990
5,000
OP
FY92
nw
After FY92
30
TOTAL
NORTH HICKORY HILL PARKING AND
SIDEWALK
i
REFERENCE MAP A 013
I
i 1
I
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
ect
and the
lot
toithesa new shelter. These improvements ere
12 saces
a sidewalk
nt needed
existing parking lot limits the number of users
to makeotheafacilitie
and is
accessiblentoruct
the
handicapped.leading
i
extremely
crowded at times.
Operating monies will fund this project.
r
FUTURE YEAR BUDGET IMPACTS
pp
Maintenance costs will remain the same.
IMPLEMENTATION'SCHEDULE
1]
What will be done?
Beginning
Date
Finishing
Source of
Date E
Funding
Before FY88
FY88
'
FY89 Construction
July 1988
Aug. 1988 2,500
OP
FY90
FY91
FY92
_
After FY92
— —
I
y REFERENCE MAP A 114 RESURFACE MERCER PARK PARKING LOT
W
f
j n
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This is a new a
condition of thero3ect to resurface the Mercer Park
increasedcondition of Parking lot has not been improved oparkin
With the new aquatic no been t O lot with a carp seal,
necessary, the last five The deteriorated 9
y to be built in the area years, although the usage I _-
FUTURE YEAR BUDGET , this improvement is n has
IMPACTS even more
Maintenance costs will remain the same while repair costswill decrease,
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE
I' I
What will wil-one? Beginning Finishing
I Before FY88 �t� �e g Source of
+ FY88 Funding r .
!1 FY89 Design
FY90 Construction Jan. 1989
FY91 May 1989
FY92 Sep. 1989 Sep, 1989 2,000 OP i^
After FY92 38,000 Op u
TOTAL
32
RESURFACE
MERCER PARK TENNIS
COURTS
V
{
REFERENCE MAP A #15
i
i
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This is a new project to resurface existing
courts with a special colored, textured tennis
court "paint";
1
re -stripe each court; purchase new nets and
wind screens. The
existing colored surface
is beginning to
J
show signs of wear and tear, the wind screens
are in poor condition,
and all nets will be due for replace-
ment at the time of this project. This surface
material helps
protect the asphalt base.
If it
is not
i
replaced periodically, the risk of needing a
complete renovation
becomes greater.
Operating monies will fund this project.
•�
FUTURE YEAR BUDGET IMPACTS
Maintenance costs should remain the same.
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE
Beginning
Finishing
Source of
JWhat
J
will be done?
Date
Date E
Funding
Before FY88
^�
FY88
J
FY89
FY90
FY91 Construction & Equipment
FY92
July 1990
Aug. 1990 10,300
OP
After FY92
TOTAL
10,300
i
y
!
33`
ro��,js�ik�bnf gJ )'R r C . -'•.r ..1 r�4 � ,;,.: ..:...:
..,
.�! ...t
ie
MERCER PARK SOFTBALL, JALL FIELDS
REFERENCE MAP A #16
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This is a new project to upgrade Mercer Park softball/baseball fields in three phases. Phase One:
Renovate two infields by removing dirt, and replacing with limestone. Phase Two: Renovate two outfields
by bringing in dirt, and leveling to proper slope. Phase Three: Improve the area between fields by
leveling, seeding and landscaping. The playing field conditions at Mercer Park, although improved in
recent years, still leave a great deal to be desired. The drainage on two of the infields is extremely
poor; limestone infields will not only provide a better playing surface, but also prevent many rain outs.
The outfields on two other fields are much too low. The area between the fields is not very aesthetically
pleasing, and could greatly enhance the entire area with some work.
This project is interrelated with three other proposed projects:
1. New Parks and Recreation Complex;
2. Lighting U of I Softball Complex;
3. Napoleon Park Renovation.
Operating monies will fund this project, there are some available funds in the Park Land Acquisition
Reserve.
FUTURE YEAR BUDGET IMPACTS
Maintenance costs should remain the same.
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE
What will be done?
Before FY88
FY88 Design & Construction: Infields
FY89 Design & Construction: Outfields
FY90 Construction: Between Fields
FY91
FY92
After FY92
34
TOTAL
Beginning
Date
July 1987
July 1988
July 1989
Finishing
Source of
Date
$
Funding
Oct. 1987
16,000
OP
Oct. 1988
20,000
OP
Oct. 1989
5,000
OP
41,000
Y'I
#Ja
is
RENOVATE CITY PARR TENNIS COURTS
REFERENCE MNP A /17
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This is a new project to resurface the present tennis courts with asphalt. The base needs a three inch
overlay, approximately 4,000 square yards of asphalt material. The finish requires one coat of asphalt
haveemulnumerousion and scracks,andxhavedepressions hold water. Both thecracks dtennis u thart t The
present n s and the deterioratedve sta dng waterhast
substantially,
en
the deterioration process. The courts will probably be unusable in three to five years.
Funding for this project would cane from operations; monies are available in the Parkland Acquisition
Reserve.
FUTURE YEAR MOGET IMPACTS
Finishing Source of
Date $ Funding
Sept.1987 49,000 OP
49,000
1�
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE
A+
Beginning
What will be done?
Date
Before FY88
—
FY88 Design and Construction
July 1987
.J
FY89
FY90
FY91
FY92
After FY92
TOTAL
I
J
z f
r; l�
Finishing Source of
Date $ Funding
Sept.1987 49,000 OP
49,000
1�
-0
J:.;
NEW PICNIC
SHELTER IN
CITY PARK
REFERENCE MAP A A18
wI
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This is a new project to erect a new 20' x 44'
rectangular
beam wood shelter in Lower
City Park. More
'
picnic shelters are needed in Cit Park especially
Y p
during
Y g
the peak season. Also, some
of the existing
f are soon in need of replacement.
,facilities
Operating monies will fund this project.
FUTURE YEAR BUDGET IMPACTS
i
There will be minimal utility costs, plus the usual in-house
maintenance costs.
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE
Beginning
Finishing
Source of
i
What will be done?
Date
Date $
Funding
Before FY88
FY88
FY89
FY90 Construction & Furnishings
July 1989
Sept. 1989 9,500
OP
�.
FY91
t ;
FY92
i
After FY92
l
36
TOTAL
d
NEW RESTROOM IN LOWER CITY PARK
'
REFERENCE MAP A 019
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This is a new project to construct a
new concrete block building in Lower
City Park to
accommodate park
tE
users, including those that are handicapped. The existing facility in Lower
City Park is
approximately 50
years old. It is in poor condition,
lacks adequate size, has poor ventilation,
and
is not in a good
E
EEEE
location for user access.
I
Operating monies will fund the project.
FUTURE YEAR BUDGET IMPACTS
i�
Maintenance costs will remain about the
same.
ri
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE
Beginning Finishing
Source of
What will be done?
Date Date
S
Funding
Before FY88
FY88
�P
FY89
FY90 Design
Jan. 1990 May 1990
3,000
OP
FY91 Construction
July 1990 Oct. 1990
57,000
OP
FY92
After FY92
JTOTAL
60,000
�l
J
I
!�
37
a
-I
J
r
CURB RAMP INSTALLATION
REFERENCE No locations designated
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This is the second year for this project involving design and construction of curb ramps at the intersec-
tion of existing sidewalks and streets. The project develops a network of accessible sidewalks enabling
physically disabled individuals to independently access many of the City's public and private facilities.
This project will have the positive effect of removing barriers which presently restrict the mobility of
physically impaired individuals within the community.
The general fund operating monies will fund the design and inspection of all curb ramps, about 18% of the
project and CDBG monies will be used to fund the construction of the curb ramps. The Committee on Commu-
nity Needs recommended $5,000 for this program, and Council approved the same from the 1987 CDBG entitle-
ment.
This project is consistent with the recommendation made in the 1983 Comprehensive Plan Update to make
services accessible to Iowa City's disabled population.
FUTURE YEAR BUDGET IMPACTS
Snow and ice removal will be done the same as the existing sidewalks.
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE
39
,en
What
will be
done?
Beginning
Date
Finishing
Source of
Date
b
Funding
Before FY88
Ramp
design
and
construction
Jan.
1987
June
1987
6,173
OP/HC
FY88
Ramp
design
and
construction
Jan.
1988
June
1988
6,173
OP/HC
FY89
Ramp
design
and
construction
Jan.
1989
June
1989
11,765
OP/HC
FY90
Ramp
design
and
construction
Jan.
1990
June
1990
12,430
OP/HC
FY91
Ramp
design
and
construction
Jan.
1991
June
1991
12,995
OP/HC
FY92
After FY92
Ramp
design
and
construction
Jan.
1992
June
1992
13,485
OP/HC
TOTAL
-63_021
39
,en
I�
RALSTON CREEK PROPERTY ACQUISITION AND CLEARANCE
REFERENCE MAP B t21
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This project involves the acquisition and clearance of a property at 11 S. Johnson Street, adjacent to
Ralston Creek. This would permit the City to repair a retaining wall, restabilize the bank, and remove a
seriously dilapidated house. The tenant would need to be relocated to better housing.
This project was not high on the CCN's priority list to be included in their 1987 entitlement. It will be
reviewed again for their 1988 entitlement.
These improvements are consistent with the 1979 Ralston Creek Watershed Management Plan and with the
recommendations for Natural Stream Corridors in the 1978 Comprehensive Plan.
FUTURE YEAR BUDGET IMPACTS
This project will require periodic lot mowing and maintenance by Public Works.
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE
Beginning
What will be done? Date
Before FY88
FY88
FY89 Land Acquisition, Demolition July 1988
FY90
FY91
FY92
After 'FY92
40
TOTAL
Finishing Source of
Date E Funding
Sept. 1988 47,480
47,480
HC
-7
IJ
TERRELL MILL PARK RIVERBANK IMPROVEMENTS
REFERENCE MAP B #22
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This is a new project to install rip rap along the Terrell Mill Park riverbank to stabilize and conserve
the park's riverfront. Stabilizing this riverbank will protect the park land and benches which sit along
the bank. It will also be an example of riverbank stabilization for other property owners along the river.
The Committee on Community Needs did not recommend funding of this project. Iowa Youth Conservation Corps
will fund labor for Mayor's Youth only if the other funds are approved.
This project is addressed in the 1979 Ralston Creek Storm Water Management Plan in reference to a need for
improvement to bank in this area as well as being covered by a policy in the Comprehensive Plan (1978)
regarding preservation and protection of stream channels.
FUTURE YEAR BUDGET IMPACTS
No annual maintenance costs are anticipated.
w
ti IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE
w
What will be done?
Before FY88
FY88
FY89 Construction
FY90
FY91
_J FY92
After FY92
TOTAL
l e
is
51'.1 4 . ili .✓. :' .. '.: � .. .i ..
Beginning Finishing Source of
Date Date E Funding
June 1988 October 1988 25,800 HC/SA/OP
25,800
41
V
3%#
42
J
RALSTON CREEK BANK IMPROVEMENT
r.'
REFERENCE MAP B 023
q
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
r�
j This project provides bank stabilization, cleaning and clearing of creek bank and restoration of plantings
to enhance the creek banks between Washington and College
Conservation
Streets with the assistance of the Iowa Youth
Corps. This is a highly visible area where visual
Stabilization
and environmental degradation is occurring.
of banks and removal of debris is needed to ensure adequate water flow through
creek bank would become an amenity
p
rather than a detriment. the creek. The
CDBG funds will pay for materials, the CCN recommended and Council approved $11,770. Iowa Youth Conserve-
tion Corps will pay labor costs of Mayor's
the design, $700. Youth crews, $12,50D. General fund operating money
'(
will pay for
The 1979 Ralston Creek Storm Water Management Plan addresses the need for improvement to the bank
area. Comprehensive Plan (1978) policy is to
in this
preserve and protect stream channels.
FUTURE YEAR BUDGET IMPACTS
Banks will need to be maintained and creek cleared periodically. This might be taken
Mayor's Youth Employment project.
- an as an annual
-
i
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE
—
What will be done? Beginning Finishing Source of
Date Date E Funding
Before FY88
i
FY88 Design & Construction June 1987 Oct. 1987
FY89
ei
R)
24,970 SA/HC/OP
FY90
't
FY91
FY92
After FY92
i
TOTAL
--24,970
3%#
42
J
TERRELL MILL PARK HANDICAPPED TRAIL
REFERENCE MAP B 024
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This project constructs a trail to make the riverfront at Terrell Mill Park accessible to persons with
physical disabilities by eliminating barriers; and to build upon the goal of the Parks and Recreation
Department to provide equal opportunities in parks and recreation services to all persons.
The Committee on Community Needs (CCN) did not recommend funding for this from 1981 CDBG entitlement; it
will be submitted for 1988 CDBG monies. General fund operations will pay for the design costs.
The CDBG Community Development Plan has a long-term objective - the elimination of barriers for the
physically handicapped.
-1
i !
FUTURE YEAR BUDGET IMPACTS
Maintenance and repair of the trail will
be necessary in the
future, but should
add little to the general
park maintenance costs.
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE
Beginning
Finishing
Source of
What will be done?
Date
Date
$
Funding
Before FY88
FY88
FY89 Design & Construction
March 1988
Aug. 1988
3,808
HC/OP
FY90
1
FY91
FY92
After FY92,
J
TOTAL
3,808
:. }9
43
-1
L
NAPOLEON PARK PARKING LOT
. REFERENCE MAP B 925
I
`
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
handicapped easily accessible to the restrooms and
i
This is a new project to provide a parking lot for the ss
it will increase the number
hfordphouth plykhaedicapped Napoleon Park. It will provide easy acme
playing areas; to redevelopthe nor arsons. More,
the restrooms and Napoleon Park parking lots, to develop these areas in a
Conservation
to iplaying
will provide employment for Youth
of parking spaces available in the north and south
the appearance. Theproject
appropriate manner, and improve
i
Corps.
Development of Napoleon Park was a goal of the 1980-85 Parks Pan.
$12,500. General fun.
lied far to finance the materials
Youth Conservation Corps will pay for the labor of Mayor's Youth work crews,
CDBG monies were app the ndi-
aFY89
I
Iowa lot near
operating monies will fund the design costs. 1987
y n The phas abeen delayed until
project
thefundsrecwereornmennot approved.ded
and the Committee
i tee on however,
capped accessiblneeded
to apply for 1988 CDBG monies.
i
FUTURE YEAR BUDGET IMPACTS areas.
diminish with the improvement of the parking
Maintenance costs will not increase and may even
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE Finishing Source of
Beginning
Date f Funding_
Date
What wil�oie7
�
Before FY88
FY88
FY89 Design & Construction
FY90
FY91
FY92
After FY92
44
TOTAL
March 1988
Aug. 1988 51,008 HA/SA/OP
51,008
WATER DEPARTMENT COMPUTER REPLACEMENT
REFERENCE MAP 8 /26
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This is a new project to purchase a new, modern computer and control instrumentation which is needed to
replace the 15 year old Control Data computer. The old computer system will continue to be used, however,
parts and service may not be available. Control Data terminates the service agreement in September 1987.
In the event the system fails and cannot be repaired, more workers will be required to operate on manual.
There is no direct environmental impact, however, a secondary environmental impact is the consequence of
poor water treatment and pressure control without a proper control system.
General Obligation bonds will fund this purchase, and water revenues will abate the bond issue.
FUTURE YEAR BUDGET IMPACTS
The existing computer system requires maintenance. This work is covered by service agreement at a cost of
$21,650. The new computer and control system is expected to have a similar cost.
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE
What will be done?
Before FY88
FY88 Purchase & Installation
Beginning
Date
July 1987
Finishing Source of
Date E Funding
Feb. 1988 275,000 GO
275,000
al
FY89
FY90
FY91
j
FY92
J
After FY92
TOTAL
i'
Beginning
Date
July 1987
Finishing Source of
Date E Funding
Feb. 1988 275,000 GO
275,000
al
gppgM'
0
I
Wi
RALSTON CREEK PARK
REFERENCE MAP B 027
oa
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
rl
This is a new project providing for
Burlington Street between Ralston Creek
acquisition and improvement of open
space on
the south side of
a
a�
tion is provided for the tenants of the
and Gilbert Street. No open space for active
high-density residential developments
and passive recrea-
w `
site. Development of this property for
park use would also enhance the area
surrounding
the proposed park
appropriate for the Ralston Creek flood
and
plain.
would
result in a land use
I
The proposed neighborhood Open Space Plan and the adopted Comprehensive Plan
in developed Iowa
cite the
need for open
parts of city close to
residential development.
space
- '
i
The Committee on Community Needs did not
recommend use of 1987 CDBG monies for
this.
I .
FUTURE YEAR BUDGET IMPACTS
Maintenance costs will be incurred annually.
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE
What will be done?
Beginning Finishing
Date
Source of
Date
$
Funding
i
Before FY88
FY88
FY89 Acquisition/Relocation
FY9D Demolition/Construction
101,000
HC
FY91
14,000
HC
FY92
I,
After FY92
TOTAL
115,000
46
it
L 1
Ilk
WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT v
REFERENCE MAP B #28 (proposed site is not yet firm)
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This is the project for the new treatment plant, upgrade existing plant, interceptor sewers, and lift
station. Treatment improvements are mandated by Federal and State regulations governing discharge of
wastewater. Collection system improvements are necessary to reduce sewer surcharging and provide for
orderly growth. Wastewater discharge from Iowa City Wastewater Treatment facility will conform to Federal
and State regulations regarding discharge of effluent.
Revenue Bonds have been sold for this project.
FUTURE YEAR BUDGET IMPACTS
There will be increased maintenance cast in operating the proposed wastewater treatment facility and
minimal cost in maintaining the trunk sewers.
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE
TOTAL
Source of
S Funding
33,911,000 RB
33,911,000
47
Beginning
Finishing
What will be done?
Date
Date
Before FY88
FY88
Design, Land Acquisition,
July 1986
Dec. 1988
Construction
FY89
FY90
FY91
FY92
After FY92
TOTAL
Source of
S Funding
33,911,000 RB
33,911,000
47
0
NORTH CORRIDOR SEWER
REFERENCE MAP B /29
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This project involves the extension of a 24" diameter trunk sewer from the intersection of Dubuque Street
andTaft Speedway northeast approximately 1,800 lineal feet. Portions of the existing trunk sewer between
Prairie du Chien Road and Dubuque Street are undersized to handle future flows. This project will allow
for future development of land between Prairie du Chien Road and Dubuque Street north of the future Foster
Road extension.
General Obligation Bonds will finance this project; they will be abated by sewer revenue.
This trunk line is shown in the Sanitary Sewer System Facility Plan as a future improvement and the
Comprehensive Plan shows the area to be served by this sewer in Phase II development.
FUTURE YEAR BUDGET IMPACTS
No extra maintenance costs will be necessary other than periodic cleaning of pipes.
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE
i
What will be done?
Beginning
Date
Finishing
Source of
k
Date
E
Funding
Before FY86
FY88
FY89
FY90
FY91
FY92
Design A Easements
Construction
July 1990
June 1991
27,500
GO
After FY92
July 1991
June 1992
127,500
GO
TOTAL
155,000
40
1
I
FRIENDSHIP STREET DRAINAGE TILE
REFERENCE MAP B #30
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This is a new project to put drainage tile where there's now open drainage at Court Hill Park along the
north side of Friendship to approximately 1900 feet east and along the south side for approximately 500
feet between Clover Street and Brookside Drive. Drainage from homes along Friendship is directed to the
street through roof and basement flexible extension lines. During freeze -thaw periods, this excess water
doesn't have time to drain away so it freezes on Friendship Street.
This tiling project can be designed and constructed in conjunction with the Ralston Creek Relief (upper
reach of the Southeast Interceptor Sewer).
Special Assessments will fund this project.
FUTURE YEAR BUDGET IMPACTS
Normal maintenance will be required.
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE
it
Beginning
Finishing
Source of
What will be done?
Date
Date
E
Funding
Before FY88
Design
Nov. 1986
March 1987
5,400
SP
FY88
Construction
May 1987
MArch 1988
39,600
SP
FY89
FY90
FY91
FY92
After FY92
TOTAL
45,000
it
ORCHARD STREET/BENTON STREET STORM SEWER - PHASE I
REFERENCE MAP B 131
it
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT II)
This is a new project to increase the capacity of the existing reinforced concrete box culvert between
Riverside Drive and Orchard Street. The existing box culvert does not have sufficient capacity to carry
existing storm water flows. This project will reduce the frequency of flooding in the area.
This project represents the first of four segments recommended in an engineering study completed by the
City to reduce flooding along Benton Creek from Benton Street to the Iowa River. It will be designed and
constructed in. conjunction with the Benton Street trunk sewer project.
General Obligation Bonds will fund the project.
FUTURE YEAR BUDGET IMPACTS
Maintenance costs on a structure such as this will be minimal.
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE
What wilL be done?
Before FY88 Design
FY88 Construction & Inspection
FY89
FY90
FY91
FY92
After FY92
50
TOTAL
Beginning Finishing Source of
Date Date $ Funding
Nov. 1986 June 1987 22,000 GO
July 1987 Nov. 1987 300,000 GO
322,000
Fit
r
ORCHARD STREET/BENTON STREET STORM SEWER - PHASE II
REFERENCE MAP B 032
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This project involves the replacement of an open concrete channel drainageway with a reinforced concrete
box culvertunder Douglass Street at Orchard Street and extending near the north property line of the
property addressed 212 Douglass Street. This project will provide adequate drainage for the property north
of Douglass Street, stop the channel from freezing, and prevent flooding of property in the area.
SThis treets Phase,
It will be de igned and constructedlin conjunction swith sBenton
the Benton Street Trunk Sewer Project.
General Obligatioas n
bonds
will
recomm anc byheCN design
i nappd porch se the easements. CDBG monies will finance
FUTURE YEAR BUDGET IMPACTS
This project will decrease the City's maintenance costs.
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE f
Beginning
Finishing
E
Source o
Funding
l_ 1 bedone?
What will
Date
Date
Before FY88
Design and Inspection
July 1987
1987
Nov. 1987
Soo
14 ,500
159
GO/HC
GO/HC
FY88
Construction
FY89
FY90
FY91
FY92
After FY92
174,000
TOTAL
=======_=
■
ORCHARD STREET/BENTON STREET STORM SEWER - PHASE III
REFERENCE MAP B /33
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This is a new project to enclose Benton Creek in a box (pipe) culvert between Benton Street and Douglass
Street. Residents in the area have requested that something be done to reduce the flooding along this
portion of Benton Creek. Some flooding is caused by ice accumulation in the winter. Enclosing the channel
in a box (pipe) culvert will increase the capacity and eliminate ice accumulation. This project will
eliminate erosion and reduce the frequency of flooding in the area.
This project is third of four segments recommended in an engineering study completed by the City to reduce
flooding along Benton Creek from Benton Street to the Iowa River. It will be designed and constructed in
conjunction with the Benton Street trunk sewer project.
>General Obligation Bonds will fund this phase of the project.
FUTURE YEAR BUDGET IMPACTS
Routine maintenance of the culvert will be required.
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE
What will be done?
Before FY88 Design
FY88. Construction d Inspection
FY89
FY90
FY91
FY92
After FY92
52
TOTAL
Beginning Finishing Source of
Date Date ; Funding
Nov. 1986 June 1987 10,000 GO
July 1987 Nov. 1987 224,000 GO
234,000
BENTON STREET CULVERT REPLACEMENT - PHASE IV
REFERENCE MAP B 134
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
.This project involves the removal and replacement of the concrete under
Bentyrbecause a northerly extension
dCainageway located just west of Orchard Street. The culvert under Benton Street is collapsing. The
property located at 228 West Benton Street was already purchased by major traffic problems.
of the culvert constructed ontinue to to block
oratesandOmayn ollapseecaus ng m jortrblock basement wall. If not
funded, the culvert will
This is Phase I o designed and planto to ctereplace
cthe sttionswwthsthe Benton Street Trunk Sewer Benton
in the area of orchard Project
Street. It
The design and construction will be funded by General Obligation bonds.
FUTURE YEAR BUDGET IMPACTS
This project will reduce future maintenance costs.
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE Finishing Source of
What will
Before FY88 Design Inspection
FY88 Construction &
FYB9
FY90
FY91
FY92
After FY92
TOTAL
Beginning Date $ Fundin
Date
9,500 GO
Nov. 1986 Nove e 1987 1987 104,500 GO
July 1987
53
v
`L
FOURTH AVENUE CULVERT REPLACEMENT
REFERENCE MAP B /35
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This is a new project involving the removal and replacement of the corrugated metal pipe arch culvert under
Fourth Avenue at Ralston Creek. The existing 7' x 13' bolted steel arch culvert causes the 10 year and 100
year flood waters to overtop the street, and lesser storms also cause significant amounts of water on
adjacent properties. The culvert project would be beneficial to the properties that currently sustain
property damage to foundations and contents of residential properties, sediment deposits on lawns and
stream bank erosion during storms exceeding 10 year return frequency.
This project is covered in the Storm Water Management Plan, Ralston Creek Watershed, Iowa City, Iowa, dated
March 1979.
General Obligation Bonds will fund this project.
FUTURE YEAR BUDGET IMPACTS
Normal maintenance will be required.
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE
What will be done? Beginning
Date
Before FY88
FY88
FY89
FY90
FY91
FY92
After FY92 Design & Construction July 1991
54
TOTAL
Finishing Source of
Date S Funding
June 1993 270,750 GO
270,750
F STREET CULVERT REPLACEMENT
REFERENCE MAP B /36
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This is a new project involving the removal and replacement of the corrugated metal pipe
F Street at Ralston Creek. The
arch culvert under
existing 7'x13' bolted steel arch culvert causes the 10
flood waters to overtop the roadway. This project would eliminate the
year and 100 year
1
year flood waters. stream bank erosion
caused by 10
This project is covered in the Storm Water Management Plan, Ralston Creek Watershed, Iowa
March 1979.
City, Iowa dated
I ,H
i
General Obligation Bonds will fund this project.
C 'y
FUTURE YEAR BUDGET IMPACTS
I
t' t!
Flood waters of recurring intervals greater than 10 years will still overtop roadway, causing mainly
clean-up maintenance costs.
1 �
1!
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE
Beginning Finishing
What will be done? Date
Source of
Date E
Funding
Before FY88
FY88
FY89
FY90
FY91
Ij
After FY92 Design & Construction July 1991 June 1993 270,750
GO
TOTAL
270,750
1
l!ies
55
1
jhl+•e'3k''Mra'x�.F F� v7 1 Y ' cl ' J+� I .: .
. .
�
.5.•
REFERENCE MAP B 037
PARK ROAD STORM SEWER
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This pproject calls for the installation of a
Road to the Iowa River via Granada Court and Manor Dtorm river from the intersection of Magowcurrently n Avenue and Park
Road concentrates storm water flow into a ravine that terminates on residential propert
Of the ravine. The soil carried with the water then de The storm sewer inlet currently located on Park
sewer will both eliminate flooding and erosion in the ravine and also prevent the deposit located
f sediment s end
the back yards. Posits in the back yards of residences. This storm
This project will be funded b ment in
y special assessments to property owners in the drainage area, i
FUTURE YEAR BUDGET IMPACTS
The additional storm sewer would require normal maintenance.
IWLE ENTATION SCHEDULE
What will
Before FY88 Design
FY88 Construction & Inspection
FY89
FY90
FY91
FY92
After FY92
50
TOTAL
Beginning Finishing
Date Source of
Date t= $
—_� Fungi
Oct. 1986 June 1987 4,600
July 1987 Oct. 1987 133,050 Sp Sp
_137.650
REFERENCE NAP B 038
NORTH DUBUQUE STREET CURB AND GUTTER PROJECT
89,000
57
'
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
J
This project involves the installation of curb and gutter along
with necessary
storm sewer
and resurfacing
on that portion of north -bound pavement on Dubuque Street between Kimball Road
and Ridge
Road. The curb
`
would better define the roadway and aid in keeping vehicles from
driving off the
pavement.
I
General obligation bonds will fund this project.
City Council requested Engineering to investigate the possibility
of completing
this project.
FUTURE YEAR BUDGET IMPACTS
_I
.]
Normal maintenance costs will be required.
INPLEIENTATION SCHEDULE
Beginning
Finishing
Source of
What will be done? Date
Date
S
Funding
f
Before FY88
FY88
FY89
FY90
FY91 Design July 1990
June 1991
5,000
GO -
FY92 Construction July 1991
After FY92
June 1992
84,000
GO
89,000
57
POTOMAC DRIVE CULVERT REPLACEMENT
REFERENCE NAP B #39
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This is a new project involving the removal and replacement of the
concrete box culvert under
too low to
Potomac Drive
accommodate entire
at the drainageway just west of Mount Vernon Drive. The culvert
capacity is
storm flows without backing up into adjoining yards.
General Obligation Bonds will fund this project.
FUTURE YEAR BUDGET IMPACTS
Normal maintenance costs will be required.
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE
Beginning
Finishing
Source of
What will be done? Date
Date
S
Funding
Before FY88
FY88
FY89
FY90
FY91
FY92
After FY92 Design & Construction Nov. 1991
March 1993
39,000
GO
TOTAL
__39_000
58
HIGHWAY 6 BYPASS DITCH REPAIR
iREFERENCE MAP B /40
t
j
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This is a new project, recommended by the
60 inch storm sewer (±2100 lin. ft.)
Iowa Department of Transportation,
consisting
of installing twin
from the CrandicR.R.
Highway 6 Bypass. This section of ditch is eroding and is
east to Keokuk
Street on
the east side of
the erosion.
very
unsightly. A
storm sewer
system would stop
"
f •�
The State of Iowa will pay for 10% of the
project; the other 90% will be funded by special
assessments.
FUTURE YEAR BUDGET IMPACTS
There will be no future costs to the City.
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE
ti
What will be done?
Beginning
Date
Finishing
Source of
Date
E
Funding
Before FY88
FY88
14
FY89
FY90
FY91
FY92
..
After FY92 Design & Construction
July 1992
June 1993
394,000
SP/SA
TOTAL
_394_000
J
tII
59
J
C
HIGH STREET STORM SEWER '
REFERENCE MAP B /41
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This is a new project to abandon approximately 250 lineal feet of 15"• concrete storm sewer line at High
Street and Morningside Drive and route storm water along High Street, then south to Court Street approxi-
mately 950 lineal feet along with enlarging existing area intake. The existing storm water line extends
under two hones and then empties into back yards. From there, the storm water flows randomly across
multiple back yards and through two hedge lines before entering an area yard intake, Project will reduce
of sod during construction, the project
includes provisions for replacement sod,
flow to existing area intake. Although there will be a loss j
This project will be funded by special assessments.
FUTURE YEAR BUDGET IMPACTS
Eliminate future problem of a storm water line that lies under homes. Normal maintenance will be required.
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE
What will be done?
Before FY88
FY88
FY89
FY90
FY91 Design & Construction
FY92
After FY92
60
TOTAL
Beginning
Date
July 1990
Finishing Source of
Date $ Funding
June 1991 57,200 SP
57,200
IN
al
61 �'
RAILROAD CROSSING SIGNALS AT KIRKWOOD & GILBERT COURT
REFERENCE MAP C /42
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This is a new project providing for warning signals at Kirkwood Avenue crossing at Gilbert Court. It is
needed to improve the crossing protection at this location.
The Iowa Department of Transportation will
fund 90% of the
project, the railroad company
will pay for 5% ; I
and General Obligation Bonds will finance the remaining 5%.
;
FUTURE YEAR BUDGET IMPACTS
The railroad will maintain the signals.
i
'
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE
Beginning
Finishing
Source of —
What will be done?
Date
Date f
Funding
Before FY88
FY88 Design & Installation
Oct. 1987
June 1988 40,000
GO/SA/CO
FY89
FY90
FY91
-�
FY92
{
After FY92
TOTAL
62
w
REFERENCE MAP C /43
NORTH DUBUQUE STREET DECELERATION LANE
j !
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
J
7
This is a new project to provide a deceleration lane for southbound traffic on North Dubuque Street turning
right onto Foster Road. Southbound traffic on North
!
Dubuque Street has difficult turning right onto Foster
Road because of increased braking distance caused by the hill
(vehicles
i
—
and relatively high average vehicle speed
tend to speed as they come off the Interstate). The deceleration lane will
traffic a space to slow down without
!
J
provide turning
danger of being rear-ended by non -turning traffic.
General Obligation Bonds will fund this project.
� !
FUTURE YEAR BUDGET IMPACTS
Normal maintenance of additional pavement will not increase the costs very much.
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE
What will be done? Beginning Finishing Source of
Date Date E Funding
Before FY88
FY88
FY89 Design & Construction July 1988 June 1989 13,200
FY90
GO
FY91
FY92
After FY92'
TOTAL
13,200
r�
i
r
rr
63
yr,K
REFERENCE MAp C i44 BENTON STREET: RIVERSIDE TO GREENWOOD
i ,
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT q
This is a new project to widen Benton Street to 5'
to 31'' from Orchard to Greenwood Drive. 4 from Riverside Drive to Orchard Street and then widen
nonexistent, and is not The existing wide enough (existing width is 25pavement is deterioratin p y, the curb is w ;'
of inadequate storm sewer. This project will eliminate over the curb flood in 9 ra idl
sewer and reduced curb height ) In addition, local residents have complained
the yards of residents, g thereby eliminating the deposition of sand 9 caused b
, salt y insufficient storm
This project is third in a series of projects which � and other road debris in
also Melrose Avenue: e
in ton to Hawkins Drive and Kirkwood Avenue' e reconstruction of arterial streets. See —
General Obligation Bonds will fund this Gilbert to DeForest.
FUTURE YEAR BUDGET IMPACTS Project, _ !
This project will reduce the maintenance costs for this portion of Benton Street,
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE
What will be done? Beginning Finishing
Before FY88 D— ate Date__ Source of
FY88 __ Funding
FY89 f
` FY90 s{
FY91 !t
FY92
After FY92 Design & Construction
*' Jan. 1992 Nov. 1992 383,200 GO
TOTAL
383,200
64 E9
y(
i
DODGE STREET - DUBUQUE ROAD TO GOVERNOR
REFERENCE MAP C 145
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT qg wide, from Dubuque Road to
This project will if the widening since
Dodge Street to four lanes,
re ect is needed since the amount of traffic has increased to the extent that e
Governor Street. This P does not handle the traffic adequately. project; the other
existing two lane facility on fo
(USwill fund 55% of the General Oblin Bonds Pro ,
Urban State Traffic Engineer Program costs will be funded by
45% of construction and the engineering
It is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan trafficway design standards.
FUTURE YEAR BUDGET IMPACTS
Normal maintenance costs will be required.
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE source of
hin
Finisg
inning Fundin
What will
Before FY88
FY88
FY89
FY90
Design and
Land Acquisition
FY92Construction
After FY92
TOTAL
Deg
Date
Aug. 1990
May 1991
Date
April 1991
Sept. 1991
195,000
420,00
615,000
GO/SA
GO/SA
wiv
al
JORM�jCRO
' RGET SERIES MT -8
PRECEDING
DOCUME
DODGE STREET - DUBUQUE ROAD TO GOVERNOR
REFERENCE MAP C #45
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Before FY88
FY88
FY89
FY90
FY91 Design and Land Acquisition Aug. 1990 April 1991
FY92 Construction May 1991 Sept. 1991
After FY92
TOTAL
J
n
d
195,000 GO/SA
420,000 GO/SA
615,000
65
A
This project will involve the widening of
Governor Street. This is
Dodge Street to four lanes, 49' wide, from
Dubuque Road to
—I
project needed since the amount of traffic has increased to the
existing two lane facility does not handle the traffic adequately.
extent that the
Urban State Traffic Engineer Program (USTEP)
45% of construction the
will fund 55% of the construction for this project;
the other
and engineering costs
will be funded by General Obligation Bonds.
It is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan
trafficway design standards.
FUTURE YEAR BUDGET IMPACTS
Normal maintenance costs will be required.
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE
What will be done?
BeginningFinishing
Date i
Source of
E
Funding
Before FY88
FY88
FY89
FY90
FY91 Design and Land Acquisition Aug. 1990 April 1991
FY92 Construction May 1991 Sept. 1991
After FY92
TOTAL
J
n
d
195,000 GO/SA
420,000 GO/SA
615,000
65
A
ROHRET ROAD PAVING IMPROVEMENT
REFERENCE MAP C t46
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This project will provide for the paving of Rohret Road 31' in width from Mormon Trek Boulevard to
relocated Highway 218. Storm sewer facilities will also be installed. This project is needed to accommo-
date the increase in traffic flow from new subdivisions adjacent to Rohret Road.
About 85% of this project could be funded by Special Assessment, the rest would be General Obligation
Bonds.
This project will service an area shown for development in Phase I (1983-88) of the Comprehensive Plan.
FUTURE YEAR BUDGET IMPACTS
Normal maintenance costs will be required.
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE
What will be done?
Before FY88
FY88
FY89
FY90 Design and Land Acquisition
FY91 Construction
FY92
After FY92
66
TOTAL
Beginning
July 1989
July 1990
Finishing Source of
Date ; Funding
June 1990 35,000 GO/SP
Nov. 1990 345,000 GO/SP
380,000
it
C
TAFT SPEEDWAY: DUBUQUE STREET TO
FOSTER ROAD
-i
REFERENCE MAP C 147
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This project involves the paving of Taft
Speedway 28' in width,
from Dubuque
Street west
to the crossroad
between Taft Speedway and Foster Road. Storm
sewer facilities will also be installed.
Graveled residen-
tial streets within the City limits are a
maintenance problem for
the City and
a nuisance
for the public.
i
About 90X of this project could be funded
by Special Assessment
and the rest
of it will
come from General
Obligation Bonds.
Current residents have requested this project. There will be
development along
Taft Speedway
that will
mean increased traffic.
P P"
Ll
FUTURE YEAR BUDGET IMPACTS
The project will reduce annual maintenance
costs on this street.
r
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE
w`
What will be done?
Beginning •
Date
Finishing
Date
$
Source of
Funding
t
_7
J
Before FY88
FY88
J
J
FY89 Design
July 1988
May 1989
35,000
GO/SP
FY90 Construction
June 1989
Nov. 1989
407,000
GO/SP
FY92
FY92
After FY92
TOTAL
-442_000
i
y
67'
it
C
i
MELROSE AVENUE: WEST HIGH TO 218
i
i
al .
I
REFERENCE MAP C #48
I
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
d
This project will provide the continuation of the existing configuration of
the
Melrose Avenue from the end of
concrete pavement near West High School to relocated Highway 218, a distance
feet. This project will provide a facility
of approximately 2,500
which will both accommodate the increased flow of traffic
generated by relocated Highway 218 and also continuity in pavement the
quality with
rest of Melrose Avenue.
I
iremaining
Special Assessments will fund approximately 37% of this project and General
costs.
Obligation Bonds will fund the
_
I
This facility is a proposed improvement in the Comprehensive Plan. This proposal would construct Melrose
Avenue (a secondary arterial) at
primary arterial standards.
Itt
FUTURE YEAR BUDGET IMPACTS
(_
Normal maintenance costs will be incurred.
—
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE
i
Beginning Finishing 9 9 9
What will be done? Date Date
Source of
$
Funding
Before FY88
g{
I�.
FY88
y,
FY89 Design and Land Acquisition Jan. 1988 Jan. 1989
115,000 GO/SP
j
FY90 ConstructionApr. 1989 Sep. 1989
753,000 GO/SP
�7
FY91
FY92
g�
s
After FY92
ps'
:1
TOTAL
868,000
'
eeej777� ,
68
f
MELROSE AVENUE - BYINGTON TO HAWKINS DRIVE
REFERENCE MAP C f49
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
ro eat involving reconstruction along with the widening of Melrose Avve. it enue to is feet from
This is a new P approximately 70 BO years old. to Traffic in this area exceeds the
Byington to South Gra nd work AvenueThe street isfapp from Qodeteriorating i Grand nueThe streetshaslalready been overlaid
necessary storm the road and curb
road's capacity; what's more,
and chipsealed several times in its lifetime. Anew six inch curb will eliminate erosion of the soil along
the edge of the pavement*
is first in a series of projects which provide for the reconstruction of arterial streets.
d.
ivers
This project ,
See also Kirkwood Avenue: Gilbert to DeForest and BentoeCSaieAssessments,and de tthe other o 40% will be funded
Approximately 60% of this project can be funded with Sp
with General Obligation Bonds.
FUTURE YEAR BUDGET IMPACTS
costs will be required.
Normal maintenance
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE Source of
Beginning Finishing T Funding
DateDate
What will be done?
�—
Before FY881989 72,000 GO/SP
i
FY88 July 1988 March 1989 338,000 GO/SP
FY89 Design April 1989
FY90 Construction
FY91 _
FY92
After FY92 410,000
TOTAL j
69�'
'',1�1
SCOTT BOULEVARD PAVING
REFERENCE: MAP C /50
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This project involves the paving of Scott Boulevard 31' in width from Court Street to Lower West Branch
Road and then to Rochester Avenue. Storm sewer facilities will also be installed. This project has
long-range benefits in providing a low -maintenance roadway from Highway 6 Bypass to Rochester Avenue. When
all the segments are in tact it will provide a route significantly more attractive than the existing
facilities.
This project is shown being funded by General Obligation Bonds and by Revitalize Iowa's Sound Economy
(RISE) funds which were approved in the amount of $355,800, approximately, 40% of construction.
This project is included in the Comprehensive Plan and is consistent with the trafficway design standards.
It will provide a truck route and aid in moving traffic from the BDI industrial area to I-80.
FUTURE YEAR BUDGET IMPACTS
This project will reduce maintenance costs on the gravel portion of Scott Boulevard north of Court;
however, there will be increased pressure for future road improvement to I-80.
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE
What will be done?
Before FY88 Design and Land Acquisition
FY88 Construction
FY89
FY90
FY91
FY92
After FY92
70
TOTAL
Beginning Finishing Source of
Date Date $ Funding
July 1986 May 1987 26,000 GO
June 1987 Dec. 1987 1,074,000 GO/SA
1,100,000
BURLINGTON/GILBERT INTERSECTION
REFERENCE MAP C /51
- DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
ILI
This is a new project to provide a left turn lane for west bound
traffic on Burlington turning onto Gilbert
and north and south bound traffic on Gilbert Street turning
traffic
onto Burlington
Street.
It will relieve
congestion for left turning vehicles.
General Obligation Bonds will finance this project.
FUTURE YEAR BUDGET IMPACTS
There will be no additional costs incurred to maintain this turning lane.
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE
w
Beginning
What will be done?
Finishing
Source of
Date
Date
E
Funding
I9
Before FY88
i
FY88
FY89 Design & Construction July 1988
June 1989
63,000
GO
[
FY90
FY91
FY92
After FY92
TOTAL
63,000
t
l t
sil
71
ILI
W®
NU
KIRKWOOD AVENUE: GILBERT TO DEFOREST
REFERENCE NAP C 052
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This is a new project to provide 45' pavement (four lanes) from Gilbert Street to Gilbert Court; 37'
pavement (three lanes) from Gilbert Court to Summit Street; and 31' pavement (two lanes) from Summit Street
to DeForest Street. The existing pavement and sub -base are deteriorating beyond the point which can be
economically repaired. In addition, traffic congestion and undersized storm sewers are a problem along
this street. This project will reduce congestion in the area and the increased storm sewer capacity will
reduce street flooding.
This project is second in a series of projects which provide for the reconstruction of arterial streets.
See also Melrose Avenue: Byington to Hawkins Drive and Benton Street: Riverside to Greenwood.
General Obligation Bonds will fund this project.
FUTURE YEAR BUDGET IMPACTS
Construction of this project will greatly reduce the annual maintenance costs for this street.
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE
Beginning Finishing Source of
What will be done? Date Date = Funding
Before FY88
FY88
FY89
FY90
FY91 Design Sept. 1990 June 1991 50,000 GO
FY92 Construction & Inspection July 1'991 Oct. 1991 1,014,000 GO
After FY92
72
TOTAL
1,064,000
.6
-1 BENTON STREET/SUNSET STREET SIGNALIZATION
REFERENCE MAP C #53
-,
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
-'
This project calls for a two-phase semi -actuated
traffic control
over -lane indications
intersection meet
at
the warrants
the intersection
for traffic
of Sunset Street and Benton Street. Traffic conditions at this
Manual on Uniform Traffic Control
Devices.
signalization as defined in the
^j
Road Use Tax monies will fund this project.
J
FUTURE YEAR BUDGET IMPACTS
The annual future costs are estimated to be ;870.00 for electricity and ;360.00 for maintenance.
i
-�
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE
}
Beginning
Finishing
;
Source of
Funding
J
What will be done.
Date
Date
Before FY86
FY88 Design and construction
June 1987
Nov. 1961
26,000
RU
FY89
FY9
FY91
-
FY92
After FY92
26,000
TOTAL
J
J
,
i�
{
73
Ilk
KIRKWOOD AVENUE AND DODGE STREET SIGNALIZATION
REFERENCE MAP C /54
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This project will involve the installation of a three-phase fully -actuated traffic control with overla
This
traffic indications and pedestrian indications at the intersectiincrea on of Kirkwood Avenue and Dodge Stree
se from the north and southKirkwoodjAvenue. �lAdditional delay be needed if awill befficl encounteredubyteast/west traffic on Kirkwood Avenue,fbutiit won
i
provide a safer intersection.
General obligation bonds will finance this project,
FUTURE YEAR BUDGET IMPACTS
Estimated future costs for electricity are ;870 per year and $360 per year for maintenance.
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE
What Will be done?
Before FY88
FY88
FY89
FY90
FY91
FY92 Design and construction
After FY92
TOTAL
74
Beginning Finishing
Date Date
July 1991 Oct. 1991
Source of
$ Funding
23,500
23,500
GO
RAILROAD CROSSING SIGNALS AT KIRKWOOD AND MAIDEN LANE
REFERENCE MAP C 155
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This is a new project to provide for warning signals at Kirkwood Avenue crossing at Maiden Lane. It will
improve the crossing protection at this location.
The Iowa Department of Transportation will fund 90% of this project, the railroad company will pay for 5%,
and General Obligation Bonds will finance the remaining 5%.
FUTURE YEAR BUDGET IMPACTS
The railroad company will maintain the signals.
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE
What will be done?
r
Ei Before FY88
FY88 Design & Installation
FY90
FY91
o FY92
After FY92
TOTAL
d
1.4
u tg
i
Beginning
Date
Oct. 1987
Finishing Source of
Date E Funding
June 1988 40,000 GO/SA/CO
40,000
W
w
PI
J
=i
i
RAILROAD CROSSING SIGNALS AT KIRKWOOD AND MAIDEN LANE
REFERENCE MAP C 155
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This is a new project to provide for warning signals at Kirkwood Avenue crossing at Maiden Lane. It will
improve the crossing protection at this location.
The Iowa Department of Transportation will fund 90% of this project, the railroad company will pay for 5%,
and General Obligation Bonds will finance the remaining 5%.
FUTURE YEAR BUDGET IMPACTS
The railroad company will maintain the signals.
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE
What will be done?
r
Ei Before FY88
FY88 Design & Installation
FY90
FY91
o FY92
After FY92
TOTAL
d
1.4
u tg
i
Beginning
Date
Oct. 1987
Finishing Source of
Date E Funding
June 1988 40,000 GO/SA/CO
40,000
ii
CLINTON STREET AND MARKET STREET SIGNALIZATION
REFERENCE MAP C /56
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT _
This is a new project involving the installation of a two-phase pretimed traffic controller with overlane L I
traffic indications and pedestrian indications at the intersection of Clinton Street and Market Street.
Traffic conditions at this intersection meet the warrants for traffic signalization as defined in the r
Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices.
General obligation bonds will fund this project.
FUTURE YEAR BUDGET. IMPACTS
Future costs are estimated at $870 per year for electricity and $360 per year for maintenance. i
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE
What will be done?
Beginning Finishing
Date
Source of
�«
Date
$ Funding
I
Before FY88
FY88 Design and construction
July 1987 Nov. 1987
23,500 GO
..J
FY89
FY90
FY91
,d
FY92
After FY92
TOTAL
23,500
tl
76
J-
FY88 SIDEWALK ASSESSMENT PROGRAM
REFERENCE Locations are not shown on a map, but are listed here.
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This is a new project involving the installation of sidewalk along various streets where it does not exist.
Requests have been made for the sidewalks.
Cae Drive - south side
California Avenue - south side
Court Street - south side from City Bus Shelter at Court Hill Park to existing walk
Highway 6 - south side fran Hawkins Drive to existing walk at Veterans. Administration Hospital
Kirkwood Avenue - south side
Oakcrest Street - both sides
Riverside Drive - east side from Burlington Street to Iowa Avenue; west side from Grand Ave. to Myrtle Ave.
Shrader Road - west side
Wayne Avenue -.north side
High Street - both sides from Lowell Street to Morningside Drive
Lowell Street - both sides from Morningside Drive to Wilson Street
Morningside Drive - both sides from Seventh Avenue to Joyfield Lane
Wilson Street
Waterfront Drive
b- east dside rfrom Hilltopfield LMobile Homneane to lParkrtotSouthgate Avenue
Southgate Avenue - north side from Waterfront Drive to Boyrum Street
VistamVillaeParkwesalongeSpenceroDrivetandoSlagleeCircle
Miller Avenue -.east side from West Benton Street to Highway No. I
Hudson Avenue - east side from West Benton Street to Highway No. I
Keokuk Street - both sides from Southgate Avenue to Hollywood Blvd.
General Obligation Bonds will fund the sidewalks along City property, $42,740; the remainirng will be funded
by special assessments to the property owners, $516,580.
FUTURE YEAR BUDGET IMPACTS
The City will have to remove snow and maintain sidewalks along City property. Property owners remove snow
from sidewalks on their property.
IWILIDflfATSON SaRou
Mut rill pdgy?
110" FY8B
wl iY88 Design A Cftstructton
r FY89
FY90
FY91
Beginning Finishing Same of
Date Onto _11
Funding
July 1987 July 1988 559.320 90/S►
f� Alter FY92
1
TOTAL
W- 5$9.320
77
4
y��
REFERENCE MAP C /58
EXTRA WIDTH SIDEWALK: MORMON TREK
t DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This is a new project involving reimbursement to
sidewalk is proposed along Mormon Trek Boulevard
developers
for the additional
of
4' of sidewalk where
to Highway 1. The
Boulevard has been included in all subdivision agreements along this street to
path along a major arterial
an 8'
along Mormon Trek
street.
provide
a safe walk/bike
Operating monies will fund the extra width.
f
FUTURE YEAR BUDGET IMPACTS
j
i Property owners maintain sidewalks.
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE
I
What will be done?
�— --
Beginning
Date
Finishing
Source of
Before FY88 Construction
Date
E
Funding
FY88 Construction
July 1986
July 1987
June 1987
4,800
OP
FY89 Construction
FY90 Construction
July 1988
June 1988
June 1989
4,800
4,800
OP
OP
FY91 Construction
July 1989
July 1990
June 1990
800
FY92 Construction
After FY92 Construction
July 1991
June 1991
June 1992
4,800
4,800
pp
OP
78
TOTAL
28,800
EXTRA WIDTH PAVING
REFERENCE MAP C /59 (3 locations)
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
The City pays the cost of collector and arterial street paving in excess of 28 feet in width. There are
three proposed street extensions included in the program; Al Phase IV of First Avenue from the north line
of First and Rochester, Part One, south approximately 240 feet; A2 Sandusky Drive from Keokuk Street west
to Gilbert Street; and i3 Foster Road from Prairie du Chien west approximately 1800 feet. Traffic
congestion may be a problem if streets determined as collector or arterial are not paved to widths greater
than 28'.
Extra -width paving will be funded by general obligation bonds.
FUTURE YEAR BUDGET IMPACTS
Maintenance costs will not increase because of overwidth pavement.
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE
Source of
E Funding
4,400 GO
36,600
-41_000
79
int
What will be done?
Beginning
Date
Finishing
Date
Before FY88
FY88
FY89
Construction -Foster Rd. (7001)
Construction -First Avenue,
July 1987
June 1988
July 1988
June 1989
Sandusky & Foster Rd. (11001)
FY90
FY91
FY92
After FY92
}
TOTAL
,.i ;
r'tt p
Source of
E Funding
4,400 GO
36,600
-41_000
79
GOVERNOR STREET RETAINING WALL
REFERENCE MAP C /60
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This is a project to build an L-shaped wall that would be attached to the existing wall on Governor Street
west of Block 11 at Oakland Cemetery. It is slowly deteriorating. In July, 1979, N.N.W. Inc. examined the
wall and.took core samples. This firm stated that within the next five to fifteen years the weather would
attack the entire surface of the wall. The firm offered two solutions - a long run and a short run. The
short run solution was to patch the wall which would improve the appearance. But since it was built around
1904 and the concrete is so old and poor in quality, patching does not work. The long run solution was to
build an L-shaped wall in front of it. It is recommended that an L-shaped wall be built before the existing
wall collapses. The L-shaped wall would stand five feet above the ground and extend four feet below the
surface then at the bottom turn 90 degrees towards the street. It would be constructed of reinforced
concrete and use the existing wall for extra support.
General Obligation bonds would fund this project.
FUTURE YEAR BUDGET IMPACTS
There will be no maintenance costs.
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE
Beginning Finishing Source of
What will be done? Date Date 5 Funding
Before FY88
FY88
FY89
FY90
FY91
FY92 Design & Construction July 1991 Sept. 1991 65,100 GO
After FY92
TOTAL 65,100
80
V
I
I's
W#F
81 Or
r
i
!� IMPROVE BRIDGES ON BROOKSIDE DRIVE AND SECOND AVENUE
REFERENCE MAP D #61 (2 locations)
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This project provides for a study to determine needs and for the subsequent design and renovation /rep 1ace-
j ment of the Brookside Drive and Second Avenue bridges over Ralston Creek. Through the Biennial Bridge
Rating Program, both bridges, which are similar in design, were found to have structural deficiencies and
are currently posted for truck weight limits. If these bridges are not renovated, both structures will
continue to deteriorate which will require more restrictive load limits and possibly closing them.
The Federal Aid Bridge Replacement Program will fund approximately 80% (;204,800) of the construction cost;
the rest would be funded by general obligation bonds.
FUTURE YEAR BUDGET IMPACTS
Normal maintenance will be continued on these bridges.
i
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE
Beginning Finishing Source of
What will be done? Date Date E Funding
Before FY88
FY88
FY89
FY90 Design July 1989 March 1990 25,000 GO
FY91 Construction 8 Inspection May 1990 Nov. 1990 281,000 GO/FA
FY92
After FY92
82
TOTAL
306,000
bl
BURLINGTON STREET FOOTBRIDGE
REFERENCE MAP 0 /62
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This project involves installation of a footbridge over Ralston Creek adjacent to the south side of the
existing Burlington Street bridge. This project will provide a route for pedestrians along the south side
of Burlington Street when crossing Ralston Creek along the same alignment as the approach sidewalk thus
moving the sidewalk further from the street curb.
The project will be financed by General Obligation bonds.
FUTURE YEAR BUDGET IMPACTS
Normal maintenance costs will be required.
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE
What will be done? Beginning
-� Date
Before FY88
FY88
FY89
FY90
FY91
FY92
After FY92 Design and Construction Aug. 1991
TOTAL
Finishing Source of
Date E Funding
June 1992
46,800
46,800
83
GO
mi
�
r�
Jo
PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE DYER HIGHWAY 6
REFERENCE No location specified
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This project provides for the design and construction of a pedestrian bridge over Highway 6 Bypass. No
specific location has bee d 'd d
n en a on yet.
ings. It will provide an
alternative
to the existing
at -grade cross -
General obligation bonds will fund this project.
FUTURE YEAR BUDGET IMPACTS
Additional funds will be necessary for snow removal.
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE
Beginning
What will be done?
Finishing
Source of,
Date
Date
E
Funding
Before FY88
_.i
FY88
FY89
.
FY90
FY91
FY92
After FY92 Design & Construction
480,000
GO
TOTAL.
480,000 =_80,000
84
`7
—
BENTON STREET BRIDGE WIDENING PROJECT
REFERENCE MAP D #64
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This project provides for the design and
widening of the Benton street bridge over the Iowa River from the
existing two lane structure to a facility
carrying four lanes. This project will include the removal and
Tl
replacement of the extensively deteriorated deck which is presently overlayed with asphalt. This project is
necessary since the amount of traffic has
increased such that the existing two lane structure cannot
adequately accommodate the traffic.
Designs, land acquisition and relocation
costs will be funded by General Obligation Bonds. Construction
will be funded with $650,000 (maximum allowed per project) of Federal Aid Bridge' Replacement Program
monies, $500,000 of Federal Aid to Urban
Systems (FAUS) and the remainder funded from General Obligation
Bonds. ($1,305,800 of General Obligation
bonds were sold for this project in FY86,)
This bridge is located on Benton Street
just east of Riverside Drive (Highway 218/6), Both streets are
arterial streets and are shown as such in
the Comprehensive Plan.
_
FUTURE YEAR BUDGET IMPACTS
Normal maintenance will be required.
(?A
j
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE
Beginning Finishing Source of
What will be done?
Date Date $ Funding
Before FY88 Design, Land Acquisition 8
Feb. 1985 Dec. 1986 726,000 GO
Relocation
1
FY88 Construction
July 1987 Oct. 1988 1,899,000 GO/FA
FY89
FY90
FY91
FY92
J
After FY92
s
TOTAL 2_625_000 j
85 I� -
'l
�r,��r'k�s7�w�..rcr,'��x��x,,;'. .'a-e,1K.�.4�..!�i.,r.,.. ...':, -,,: �: ,. .•,.a.
MELROSE AVENUE BRIDGE IMPROVEMENTS
REFERENCE: MAP D /65
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This project was in the FY87-91 CIP to repair the bridge deck. Now, it involves replacement and expansion
of the bridge located on Melrose Avenue over the Heartland Railroad tracks. The bridge would be recon-
structed and widened to four lanes in conjunction with the improvements to Melrose Avenue. The bridge deck
surface and the Melrose Avenue pavement are deteriorating to such an extent that complete replacement is
necessary. The average daily traffic of 11,000 vehicles warrants expansion to a four -lane facility. (A
portion of Melrose Avenue, located in University Heights, will still be two lanes.)
The Federal Aid Bridge Replacement Program would fund $616,000 and the remaining costs would be financed by
General Obligation Bonds.
FUTURE YEAR BUDGET IMPACTS
Maintenance costs will be reduced with this improvements.
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE
A
86 _I
Beginning
Finishing
Source of
What will be done?
Date
Date
$
Funding
Before FY88
Preliminary Design/Recommendation
July 1986
June 1987
6,000
GO
FY88
Final Design & Land Acquisition
July 1987
March 1988
177,000
GO
FY89
Construction
April 1988
Nov. 1988
847,000
FA/GO
FY90
FY91
-
FY92
After FY92
TOTAL
1,030,000
A
86 _I
01
60.
2.2.22
....
WOOLF AVENUE BRIDGE DECK REPAIR
REFERENCE MAP D 066
I --
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
I
This project involves replacing the bridge deck located on Woolf Avenue (over Highway
Rapids and Iowa City Railway Co.). The
6/218, and Cedar
r,
Woolf Avenue bridge deck is deteriorating in
spalling, creating many potholes, and the deck reinforcing steel isrusting.
that concrete is
If not funded,
deck will continue to deteriorate, whereby an entirely new bridge deck will be
the bridge
necessary.
General obligation bonds will fund this project.
k t1
FUTURE YEAR BUDGET IMPACTS
Present and future maintenance costs will be greatly reduced.
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE
r
What will be done?Beginning Finishing
Source of
Y
--__ Date Date E
Funding
Iq
Before FY88
FY88
FY89
FY90
FY91
FY92
,)
l
After FY92 Design & Construction July 1992 June 1993 210,000
GO
:...:
TOTAL
i
210,000
=_210_022
I
r
i�
87
60.
REFERENCE MAP D 067
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
MINI -GREENHOUSE
This is a new project to construct a prefab greenhouse shell capable of being disassembled and relocated,
for propagation of flowers and other plant materials needed by Forestry, CBD Maintenance and Parks. The
Forestry and CBD Divisions are using the old Prairie Dog Pit and Zoo building to start and grow approxi-
mately
College60o0startflowers
somefor
flowersuse.
alternatives
purchasing fromvlocalhave
gre greenhouses. These two alternativesKirwoodCommunit
are deemed
prohibitive based on both cost and availability of flowers. As a result, we now grow the flowers from
f starts purchased from Ball Seed Co. The greenhouse will eliminate the transfer time incurred each day when
the flowers must be moved from the Pit to the building due to early spring temperature fluctuations. It
will also allow* us to provide better stock that will not require as much maintenance after they are
planted.
iOperating monies will fund this project.
i
FUTURE YEAR BUDGET IMPACTS
There shouldn't be any maintenance costs.
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE
What will be done?
Before FY88
FY88
FY89
FY90
FY91 Purchase & Assembly
FY92
After FY92
88
TOTAL
Beginning
Date
Jan. 1991
Finishing Source of
Date S Funding
March 1991 5,000 OP
5,000
ii
ADDITION TO CEMETERY BUILDING
In
REFERENCE MAP D 068
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This is an addition to the existing shop and work area, 576 square feet (16'X36'), that will provide more
work and storage space. Cemetery equipment must be kept inside during the winter and in inclement weather.
When the equipment is inside, there is little room to do maintenance on the equipment.
This project provides for contracting of block laying and roofing; all the rest of the work will be done by
City crews. The materials will be purchased from the Perpetual Care Trust monies, and the General Fund
will repay the Trust over a ten year period.
FUTURE YEAR BUDGET IMPACTS
An increase in heating and lighting costs can be expected.
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE
What will be done?
Before FY88
FY88 Construction & Inspection
FY89
FY90
FY91
FY92
After FY92
TOTAL
Beginning Finishing Source of
Date Date $ Funding
July 1987 Nov. 1987 12,000 OP
12,000
REPLACE CEMETERY'S STORAGE BUILDING
REFERENCE MAP D I69
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This is a new project for replacing the deteriorating out -building, that is used for storage, with a 26' x
40' standard painted steel pole building. 367.5 square feet of enclosed and 333.5 square feet of open
storage space would be replaced by 1,040 feet of enclosed storage space. The existing building was built
in the 1930's and was used at City Park for chicken coops and small animals. It is badly deteriorated and
needs to be replaced. The building is essential for the storage of Cemetery equipment. Increasing the
size will allow for the storage of equipment that has been exposed to the weather.
Operating funds will fund this project.
FUTURE DEAR BUDGET IMPACTS
There will be no additional maintenance costs.
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE
90
TOTAL
9,300
Beginning
Finishing
Source of
What will be done?
Date
Date
E Funding
Before FY88
FY88
FY89 Construction
July 1988
Sept. 1988
9,300 OP
FY90
FY91
FY92
After FY92
90
TOTAL
9,300
DOMESTIC HOT WATER TANK - RECREATION CENTER
REFERENCE MAP D /70
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This is a new project providing for the addition of an auxiliary heater for summer time heating of domestic
hot water. It will reduce the cooling load on the building air conditioner by eliminating the need for
boilers to remain at high temperature levels in the summer to supply domestic hot water. The pool can be
heated by boilers with much lower water temperatures than those required by heating domestic hot water for
showers. For two months, the pool air and water need no heat.
Operating monies will fund this project.
FUTURE YEAR BUDGET IMPACTS
This heater can be maintained with present in-house personnel. It is designed to save electrical and gas
costs. The energy payback has not been established.
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE
Beginning Finishing Source of
What will be done? Date Date E Funding
Before FY88
FY88
FY89
FY90
FY91 Purchase & Installation July 1990 Aug. 1990 6,500 OP
FY92
After FY92
TOTAL
6,500
RECREATION CENTER ACCESSIBILITY
REFERENCE MAP D /71
-1
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This is a new project to modify the Recreation Center to make the darkroom and potter's studio accessible
to the handicapped population in Iowa City. Currently the darkroom and potter's studio are not accessible
for use by the handicapped. Certain construction items need to be done to ensure participation of the
handicapped person into these areas of the Recreation Center. 1
} f
Operating monies will fund this project. ! j
FUTURE YEAR BUDGET IMPACTS
No additional costs will be incurred.
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE
TOTAL
92
13,000
Beginning
Finishing
Source of
What will be done?
Date
Date
E
Funding
Before FY88
FY88
FY89 Design
Jan. 1988
Feb. 1988
1,000
OP
FY90 Construction
July 1989
Sept. 1989
12,000
OP
FY91
FY92
After FY92
TOTAL
92
13,000
W
REFERENCE MAP D /72 RECREATION CENTER ROOF REPAIRS
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT C
This is a new project to make extensive repairs to the perimeter of the Recreation Center roof in order to
extend the life of the roof by five to ten years. The perimeter of the roof is the location most affected
by freeze/thaw action,
if left unattended, The damage will extend into the main section of the roof within the next few years
i To halt this deterioration, the roof edges must be repaired/replaced,
1 Operating monies will fund this project; there are funds available in the Recreation Facilities Reserve,
FUTURE•YEAR BUDGET IMPACTS
1=1 Actual maintenance casts will be reduced.
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE
What wil-one?
11 Before FY88
FY89 Design & Construction
N FY90
FY91
FY92
After FY92
_J
TOTAL
is
rl
rni• i � ir'1C ( .
Beginning Finishing
Date Date Funding of
Funding
July 1987 Oct, 1987 15,000 OP
15,000
93
-I
REFERENCE MAP 0 /73 INSTALL AIR CONDITIONING IN RECREATION CENTER
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This is a new project for the installation of air conditioning in remaining areas of the building that were
not air conditioned during initial construction: gym, game room, locker rooms, arts and craft room, and
two offices. The first phase of the project (;15,000) is to air condition the craft room and two offices.
The craft room is the only room on the upper level which is not air conditioned. Not only is it utilized
for crafts, but also for other programs and a meeting room. The two offices which are not air conditioned
are occupied by two program supervisors, and the summer heat and humidity make working conditions almost
unbearable. Phase II, the rest of the project, would provide air conditioning for the
and locker rooms in order to make sunnier programs and the center much more attractive for the citizens of
Iowa City, gymnasium, game room
Operating monies will fund this project.
FUTURE YEAR BUDGET IMPACTS
There will be substantial impact on utility costs - amount is undetermined at this time.
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE
94
TOTAL
120,000
What will
Beginning
Date
Finishing
Source of
Before FY88
Date
$
Funding
FY88
FY89
FY90
Purchase & Installation, Phase I
July 1988
Aug. 1988
FY91
Consultant
15,000
OP
FY92
After FY92OP
Purchase & Installation, Phase II
July 1991
2,000
Nov. 1991
103000
Op
94
TOTAL
120,000
it
TWO-WAY RADIO SYSTEM REPLACEMENT
REFERENCE Not located on a map.
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This is a new project replacing the City's current VHF and UHF radio systems with one trunked 800 MHz radio
system. The radio equipment in Fire, Police and Public Works is old, worn out and needs to be replaced.
In addition, currently used radio frequencies are crowded from use by non -Iowa City agencies. The 800 MHz
system will greatly improve radio communications for City departments using two-way radios.
l
General Obligation Bonds will fund this project.
FUTURE YEAR BUDGET IMPACTS
i
Radio repair costs will be reduced with the new system.
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE
i
What will be done? Beginning Finishing Source of
Before FY88 Date Date E Funding
FY88
FY89
FY90 Purchase & Install -police & Fire July 1989 June 1990 128,000 GO
FY91 Purchase & Install -Public Works July 1990 June 1991
FY92 Purchase & Install -Transit 407,978 GO
After FY92 July 1991 June 1992 166,148 GO
TOTAL
1_302_126 i
PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING
REFERENCE No location specified.
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This project provides for construction and equipment of a public safety facility to house the Iowa City
Police Department and Station 1 of the Fire Department. The present Police/Fire Department building is ..
totally inadequate, antiquated, lacking in space and too deteriorated to support reasonable public safety i
efforts in Iowa City. This project will provide approximately 14,000 square feet of space for the Police
Department and 16,000 square feet for the Fire Department.
General Obligation Bonds will fund this project; voters must approve the bonds. r
FUTURE YEAR BUDGET IMPACTS
Maintenance plus reserve should total about ;150,000 per year.
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE
What will be done?
Before FY88
FY88
FY89
FY90
FY91
FY92 Design & Construction
After FY92
96
TOTAL
Beginning Finishing
Date Date
July 1991 June 1992
Source of
E Fungi
3,045,000
3_045_000
GO
ANIMAL CONTROL FACILITY RENOVATION
ti
i
y.
REFERENCE MAP D /77
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This is
ect
odel the
Animal
involves a creating aonewmreceptionearea,na private office, laailockernroom with shoto add on a wers, enlaThe rging the lcat
room, expanding the dog room and constructing new kennels, and increasing the number of dog runs from 8 to
12. The existing garage will be incorporated into the remodeling, so a new garage will be built.
General Obligation bonds would finance this project. The bond issue will require voter approval. This
facility is also used for lost and stray pets from the county; JCCOG has researched the possibility of s
joint facility, but found little interest.
FUTURE YEAR BUDGET IMPACTS
Maintenance of the building will be simplied but will cost about the same.
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE
What will be done?
Beginning Finishing
Date
of
Before FY88
DateSource
E
Funding
FY88
FY89
FY90 Design and construction
FY91
July 1989 June 1990
FY92
119,450
GO
After FY92
TOTAL
119,450
97
TRANSIT FLEET REPLACEMENT
REFERENCE Not located on a map.
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This schedule provides for the replacement of worn-out transit coaches and to decrease the fleet. The
purpose of this schedule is to lower bus maintenance costs, increase service reliability, improve the image
of Iowa City Transit (ICT) as well as reduce the fleet size from 29 buses to 25. The industry standard for
the life of a bus is 12 years. Currently, ICT operates one 1963, one 1967, twelve 1972, two 1974, three
1977, three 1982, and seven 1984 buses.
Funding for buses is projected at 75% Federal Transit Assistance, 25% from local monies. This project is
contingent upon receiving the federal monies.
Currently, the Comprehensive Plan encourages the use of mass transit system to serve the transportation
needs of Iowa City's residents.
FUTURE YEAR BUDGET IMPACTS
Future maintenance costs will be reduced with newer equipment. In addition, other costs will be reduced
such as.insurance when the fleet size is reduced. Newer equipment will have significantly less emissions
besides.being less noisy.
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE
e
•i
i
Beginning
Finishing
Source of
r'
What will
be done?
Date
Date
$
Funding
Before FY88
Purchase
of 3 buses, sell 5
March 1986
Jan. 1987
319,800
FA/OP
^
FY88
Purchase
3 buses, sell 5
July 1987
June 1988
397,500
FA/OP
FY89
Replace 2
buses
July 1988
June 1989
270,000
FA/OP
3
FY90
Replace 2
buses
July 1989
June 1990
274,000
FA/OP
FY91
Replace 2
buses
July 1990
June 1991
280,000
FA/OP
FY92
Replace 3
buses
July 1991
May 1992
426,000
FA/OP
After FY92
til
l!9 ,
TOTAL
1_967_300
N
\�
98
.j j
e
•i
REFERENCE MAP D t79
CIVIC CENTER ELEVATOR
J DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This is a new project to put in an elevator to make three main levels of the Civic Center accessible to the
- handicapped. The Civic Center's multi-level design has stairs connecting the six levels an
majority of the building being inaccessible for the physically disabled individuals like d results in the
the elderly and
the handicapped. The elevator would replace the stairs on the east side of the lobby,. Although single
elevator is not a complete solution, it will make the east side of the building accessible to employees as
ii well as to the general public. The Police and Fire Departments located in the west side of the building
R can be accessed by Gilbert Street entrances,
The Committee on Community Needs did not recommend use of 1987 CDBG funds for this project
submitted again for 1988 CDBG monies.
� J it will be
FUTURE YEAR BUDGET IMPACTS
An annual maintenance agreement for the elevator would cost E1,750. Annual electrical costs are estimated
E1 at annual
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE
�y
What willbeep
Before FY88
FY88
FY89 Design & Construction
FY91
I FY92
After FY92
TOTAL
N
04
f
Beginning
Date
July 1988
Finishing Source of
Date i Funding
Dec. 1988 100,000 HC
100,000
99
.e tf 1
PROJECT
CIP PENDING LIST
NEN BRIDGE CONNECTING GOVERNOR STREET AND KEOKUK STREET
This project will involve the connection of Governor Street,
which ends at the Heartland Railroad tracks, with Keokuk Street
primarily at Kirkwood Avenue. This project includes the con-
struction of a new bridge over the railroad tracks as well as
complete right-of-way purchase for two blocks. This project
will enable the existing one-way couplet on Governor and Dodge
streets to be extended from Bowery Street to Kirkwood Avenue.
By providing another railroad crossing, this project also will
lessen the amount of traffic traversing the Summit Street bridge,
which is a continual maintenance problem.
LANDFILL REPLACEMENT
The Iowa Legislature's Committee on Energy and Environmental
Protection is working on a schedule for phasing out sanitary
landfills in Iowa. House File 2397 (1986 Iowa Acts, Chapter 1175)
states that by July 1,1988, a permit for an existing landfill
will not be renewed "unless the applicant files a plan detailing
the extent that alternative disposal methods are available and
feasible, and a timetable for implementation of those methods."
The Public Works Department has suggested studying both a solid
waste incineration plant and also a Refuse Derived fuel plant.
Preliminary cost estimates are $19,740,000 for the former and
$5,730,000 for the latter.
CLEAR CREEK SCIENCE/RESEARCH PARK
Iowa City encourages research and development and industrial
expansions in order to increase and diversify its tax base as
well as provide employment opportunities for its citizens. This
project would extend City services - water, sewer and streets -
to the boundary of the proposed Clear Creek Science/Research Park.
100
ESTIMATED
PROJECTED COST
$1,800,000
$19,740,000
or
$ 5,730,000
$ 1,480,000
�4 !
In
I
PROJECT
RIDGE ROAD AND DUBUQUE STREET INTERSECTION
This project is needed to improve the right turn movement from
Ridge Road onto Dubuque Street. Currently, traffic proceeding
south on Ridge Road, then turning north onto Dubuque Street must
use both lanes of Dubuque Street. City engineers will develop
some alternatives to alleviating the problem.
AIRPORT MASTER PLAN II
Additional land acquisition and aerial easements improvements
to runways and taxiways. To be done after AIRPORT MASTER
PLAN I if FAA funding will be approved.
RIVER CORRIDOR BUFFER AND TRAIL SYSTEM
The
le
trail ralong thea
IowahRiver cincluding 00 footavegetativecbuffer
where possible. The proposed trail system provides an energy -
conserving means of connecting existing parks, historic sites,
and areas of residential, commercial, cultural and recreation
Plan'interests.
sgoal-1hsystem
toprelates
edirectly
rotectandenhancethto the
eenvironmentalensive
quality
of the City and its environs, and to wisely use and conserve energy.
The buffer and trail system will require maintenance and periodic
repair - mowing and brush trimming along the trail will be necessary,
Protection and enhancement to surface -water quality provided by a
vegetative buffer will alleviate extensive runoff and erosion from
urban land uses.
IOWA AVENUE RESTORATION
This project provides for the rehabilitation of Iowa Avenue from
Gilbert Street to Clinton Street. It includes construction of a
thedelimind ationanon
fithehparkingtreinothekmiddlehofothel
ed street.inThe
1'9 tivenparkingabeiprovidedsbeforeitherparkingsintthesmiddleaofethe
`i{ street can be eliminated.
ESTIMATED V
PROJECTED COST
E 138,000
$2,790,238
i
$ 357,585
i
Costs to be determined by
study.
I
101
PROJECT
NORTH DUBUQUE STREET SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
This project involves the removal and replacement of the existing
4 foot wide sidewalk located on the west side of Dubuque Street
between Kimball Road and University of Iowa Mayflower Apartments.
The proposed width is 8'. Due to the high rate of pedestrian traffic
on Dubuque Street, north of Park Road which originates mainly from the
Mayflower Apartments, the existing 4' wide sidewalk located on the west
side of Dubuque Street should be replaced with a wider facility. To
date, the University of Iowa has indicated no interest in this project.
102
ESTIMATED
PROJECTED COST
$48,500
ml