Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1987-02-24 Info Packetr V City of Iowa City MEMORANDUM Date: February 19, 1987 To: City Council r From: Assistant City Manager Re: Parks Shelter Reservation Fees The attached memo from the Director of Parks and Recreation contains a recom- mendation from staff and from the Parks and Recreation Commission that reser- vation fees for the use of park shelters be increased for the upcoming season. It summarizes the various options considered and presents Option "A" as the most desirable alternative. The recommended fee increases will be implemented for the upcoming season in the absence of objection by Council. If you have questions or concerns regarding this issue, please raise them at your informal meeting on February 23, 1987. cc: City Manager Director of Parks & Recreation bj4/9 a9� I OF PRECEDING DOCUMENT :a City of Iowa City MEMORANDUM Date: February 19, 1987 To: City Council From: Assistant City Manager Re: Parks Shelter Reservation Fees The attached memo from the Director of Parks and Recreation contains a recom- mendation from staff and from the Parks and Recreation Commission that reser- vation fees for the use of park shelters be increased for the upcoming season. It summarizes the various options considered and presents Option "A" as the most desirable alternative. The recommended fee increases will be implemented for the upcoming season in the absence of objection by Council. If you have questions or concerns regarding this issue, please raise them at your informal meeting on February 23, 1987. cc: City Manager Director of Parks & Recreation bj4/9 parks & recreation department MEMO Steve Atkins, to: City Manager Terry Trueblood, from. Director of Parks & Recreatio re: Park Shelter Reservation Fees date - February 17, 1987 i 1 At the Park and Recreation Commission meeting of February 11, 1987, staff presented the commission with a proposal to increase park shelter reservation fees. There were two primary reasons for the proposed increases: 1). As requested in the budget process, we plan to hire an additional temporary maintenance worker, and assign this individual, almost exclusively, the responsibility of cleaning park shelters and restrooms. The fee increases will cover the city's cost in hiring this additional person. 2). Even though the shelter reservation fees were increased from $2.00 to $4.00 last year (from $5.00 to $10.00 for the enclosed shelter), our fees are extremely low by comparison, and will still be low even with the new increases. Several alternatives were presented, and the commission voted to endorse one which establishes fees on a graduated scale, according to the size of the shelter, as follows: SEATING FEE CAPACITY (5 hours or less) 8-12 $ 4.00 24 $ 5.00 36 $ 7.00 48-54 $10.00 60 $12.00 80-84 $16.00 132 $26.00 Enclosed $20.00 For a reservation of more than five hours (could be as much as sixteen hours), the fee will double. We begin accepting advance reservations on March 2nd, and need to advertise the week of February 23rd. Therefore, I would appreciate your Placing this item on the agenda for the Council meetings of February 23rd and/or February 24th. Att. city of iowa city APA- 2-11-87 CITY OF IOWA CITY DEPARTMENT OF PARKS & RECREATION PARK SHELTER RESERVATION FEES CURRENT FEES: Open air shelters =.$ 4,00 Enclosed shelter = $10.00 FY'88 PROJECTED REVENUE: 1,500 reservations @ $4.00 = $6,000 100 reservations @ $10.00 = I1 000 7 000 SOME POSSIBILITIES (open air): SEATING CAPACITY OPTION* A OPTION* "B" OPTION* urn OPTION* OPTION 8-12 (6 shelters) $ 4,00 $ 4,00 Dn IE" 24 (one shelter) 36 (14 shelters) 5.00 5.00 $ 4.00 4.00 b 4.00 4,00 $ 4.00 48-54 (3 shelters) 7,00 10.00 6.00 8'00 5,00 4.00 6.00 6.00 60 (4 shelters) 80-84 (4 shelters) 12.00 16.00 10.00 7.00 9'00 6.00 7.00 6,00 132 (one shelter) 26.00 14.00 22.00 12.00 10.00 6.00 6.00 20.00 16.00 12.00 average per shelter $ 8,94 E 7.73 $ 6.76 enclosed shelter $20.00 $20.00 $ 5.64 $ 5.82 projected $15.00 $15.00 $15.00 revenue percentage reduction $15,410 3.853(25%) $13,595 2 719(20%) 1,640 $11 $8996(10%) 960 $10 net revenue $11,557 30 876 746(15%) 9,894 023(30%) net increase $ 4,557 $ 3,876 8,964 9,E07 $ 2,894 $1,964 $ 2,207 Net increase needed to cover cost of additional temporary maintenance worker = $3,500,00 *All options are based on a $4,00 minimum; beyond that: Option "A" = Approximately 204 per individual Option "B" = Approximately 174 per individual Option "C" = Approximately 154 per individual Option D = Approximately 124 per individual (Figures are rounded to the nearest dollar). al `:,.-11 Y CITY OF IOWA CITY DEPARTMENT OF PARKS & RECREATION PARK SHELTER CAPACITIES 2-11-87 07 toot SEATING CAPACITY SHELTER (around tables) Brookland Park 36 City Park 01 36 City Park 02 80 City Park N3 80 City Park N5 36 City Park 011 132 (larger section 84) (small section 48) City Park 012 36 City Park 013 (enclosed) 66 City Park 014 36 City Park 015 36 City Park 016 80 City Park 017 36 Court Hill Park 01 36 Court Hill Park 02 36 Court Hill Park 03 36 Court Hill Park 04 36 Crandic Park 36 Creekside Park 36 Happy Hollow Park 48 Hickory Hill (North) 60 Hickory Hill (South) 54 Mercer Park 60 North Market Square 36 Oak Grove Park 12 Pheasant Hill Park 12 Reno Street Park 12 Sturgis Ferry Park 01 8 Sturgis Ferry Park 02 8 Terrill MIll Park 24 Villa Park 12 Wetherby Park 60 Willow Creek Park 60 2-11-87 07 toot t7 Johnson County Council of Governments rr j410 E %bshirgtonS[ bvva City, bow 5224O � Date: February 13, 1987 To: Iowa Ci��yyiCCffi ncil It From: Don Schmeif, JCC Executive Dir c or Harvey Miller, Iowa City Chief of Re: Joint Animal Control Facility During last year's discussion of the expansion of the Iowa City animal shelter, the Iowa City City Council requested that the JCCOG staff review the feasibil- ity of converting the existing shelter to a "joint" facility by allowing other $, agencies within Johnson County to participate in the service it provides and in to its cost of operation. Although the proposed Iowa City FY88 budget does not appropriate the necessary funding for the facility's expansion this next fiscal year, there is nevertheless some efficiency realized in limited joint use of the facility without its expansion. This memorandum sets forth a proposal developed by the JCCOG staff after considerable research and analysis of the si initial request. c. In 1986 the animal shelter harbored 1,138 animals of which 249 or 22 percent originated from the unincorporated area of Johnson County (235), University e' Heights (5) and Hills (9). The fee charged to these jurisdictions is $15 for each dog and cat or for any other animal. The 249 animals brought in from outside the City, of which 133 were dogs and 116 were cats, resulted in $3,735 fees of collected. The other jurisdictions in Johnson County either have their own animal shelter or contract with a local kennel or veterinarian to accommodate their animal control needs. The cost for this service averages about $4 per animal per day for an average length of stay of five days, a cost to the community of approxi- mately $20. If an animal is euthanized, the cost increases to approximately $30. It is probably most cost-effective for these communities with immediate access to a kennel or veterinarian to continue with their private animal con- trol arrangements. For other communities, including the County, contracting f with Iowa City for this service may be the least cost option. Even though the City's animal shelter is in need of expansion, the animal shelter personnel are willing to take in animals from other jurisdictions for a trial period of one year. This assent is based on the assumption that there would not be an appreciable increase in the number of sheltered animals. According to a survey of some of the communities, the number of animals picked up by the communities' officials in 1985 varied from five to as many as 32 for Horth Liberty. It is proposed that a flat fee of $25 per euthanized animal be assessed to the County or community from which the animal is brought in. For an animal which is reclaimed or adopted, the fee would be paid by the person taking possession of the animal. The fees derived from the accommodation of these animals would result in net program income to Iowa City's animal shelter operation, as the 2 `T incremental cost for caring for these animals would be considerably less. Yet, a $25 fee for each animal is in most cases less than the fee the County or communities are currently paying. We would also suggest that this proposal be implemented with the following conditions: 1. A 28E agreement would be entered into between the City of Iowa City and the County or each participating comnunity and include the following elements: a. A schedule of fees or reference thereto in a resolution adopted by the Iowa City City Council establishing annual fees. b. A minimum and maximum period for harboring the animals before being euthanized. i C. Procedures for handling the animals, the payment of fees, and for the i; reclaiming of animals. G' 7 d. Waiver of liability against the City of Iowa City for damages caused beyond its control. 2. All animals would be dropped off at the animal shelter by county or city qi officials or designated persons from the jurisdictions from which the animals originate. (The animal shelter personnel presently accept stray animals brought in by other persons regardless of their place of origina- tion.) is 3. The County and each community would be billed on a monthly or quarterly basis for animals which originate from the County or community and are euthanized. For animals which are reclaimed or adopted, the fees, nd ar- ing to an established schedule, would be paid by the persons taking posses - Sion of the animals. (The animal shelter staff has expressed some preference for the present system of collecting fees for animals when they are brought in. This is an option which will be explored further.) j; The use of the Iowa City animal shelter as a joint facility has the benefit of providing an immediate service to surrounding jurisdictions while providing needed t little added cost. The srvice is necessarily rimited because am income to hthe acurrent afacility cannot accommodate aesubstan- tial number of additional animals. Its joint use by the City of Coralville would be pre-empted for this reason. Also, University Heights officials have expressed an interest in the staff patrolling their community. Limited staff resources may preempt this service but it is a matter which will be explored ` further. ' The eventual unlimited use of the animal shelter by all jurisdictions, however, should be a goal worth pursuing in the future. If each jurisdiction were to contribute toward the operation and maintenance through joint control of the facility, whether owned by the City of Iowa City or not, there can only be greater efficiency and savings realized by all the jurisdictions. l The staff of the JCCOG and of the City of Iowa City anticipate presenting this proposal to other jurisdictions which may have an interest. We will proceed on this basis unless the City Council directs us otherwise. DS/sp 7WO I i DAN L HUDSON.ASSESSOR DENNISJ. BALORIDGE DEPUTY OFFICEOF 3lohia (Up Citp Swoor Johnson County Administration Bldg. P.O. Box 1350 . Iowa City, Iowa 52244 February 13, 1987 CAROLYN R. BURKE. DEPUTY Dear Conference Board Member: The meeting of the Iowa City Conference Board for the public hearing on the Iowa City Assessors' FY '88 badget.is scheduled for Monday, February 23, 1987 at 7:00 P.M. at the Iowa City Civic Center. Enclosed is the agenda, a revised Itemized budget and a copy of the January 26, 1987 minutes. If you have any questions about the budget or anything else, feel free to call me. Sincerely, Dan L. Hudson Iowa City Assessor DLH:dfg enclosures February 13, 1987 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: The Iowa City Conference BoardCivic Centerwill meet FebruaryFebruary 23, 1 m uncil Chambers. The 9at the Iowa City meeting is to hold a public hearing on the Iowa City purpose of the m Assessors' proposed budget for FY '88. AGENDA: 1. Call meeting to order by the Chairperson. 2. Roll call by taxing body. 3. Act on minutes of January 26, 1987 Conference Board meeting. 4. Public hearing on budget. 6.Adopt budget. with Johnson 6. Discuss a combined meeting County Conference Board. 7, other business. 8. Adjourn. Dan L. Hudson Clerk, Conference Board V' , ITEMIZED BUDGET - ASSESSMENT EXPENSE FUND EXPENDITURE_ FYI SALARIES City Assessor First Deputy Second Deputy Plat Supervisor Clerk Total Salaries OTHER EXPENDITURES Board of Review Employer Share: FICA Employer Share: IPERS Mileage & Auto Office Supplies, post & Tele. , Subscr. & Dues Bonds & Workman's Comp. Equipment Maintenance Appraisal service Insurance Continuing Education Appeals to Court Schools & Conferences Legal Unemployment Conference Board Examining Board Computer Charge Total Other Expenditures TOTAL BUDGET UNENCUMBERED BALANCE TRANSFER FROM SPEC. APPR. FUND TO BE RAISED BY TAXATION FY 88 $ 36,250 $ 37,340 29,000 25,380 29,870 32 i' 32 11.530 $127,980 35 35 Wi F1 +i ej 34 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 =j 44 45 46 47 :,•1 48 49 50 51 52 ITEMIZED BUDGET - ASSESSMENT EXPENSE FUND EXPENDITURE_ FYI SALARIES City Assessor First Deputy Second Deputy Plat Supervisor Clerk Total Salaries OTHER EXPENDITURES Board of Review Employer Share: FICA Employer Share: IPERS Mileage & Auto Office Supplies, post & Tele. , Subscr. & Dues Bonds & Workman's Comp. Equipment Maintenance Appraisal service Insurance Continuing Education Appeals to Court Schools & Conferences Legal Unemployment Conference Board Examining Board Computer Charge Total Other Expenditures TOTAL BUDGET UNENCUMBERED BALANCE TRANSFER FROM SPEC. APPR. FUND TO BE RAISED BY TAXATION FY 88 $ 36,250 $ 37,340 29,000 25,380 29,870 26,140 21,680 15,670 22,330 11.530 $127,980 $132,210 $ 9,000 9,000 6,000 8,500 13,000 750 1,100 200 400 13,300 3,000 56,500 1,500 2,000 2,000 0 30 6,00o $132,280 $260,260 68,741 4 739 $186,780 $ 9,000 10,220 6,240 500 8,800 1,000 1,200 200 400 15,200 3,500 15,000 1,500 2,000 2,000 0 30 8,000 $ 84,790 $217,000 irpe V BUDGET - SPECIAL APPRAISERS FUND Mapping TO BE RAISED BY TAXATION GRAND TOTAL TO BE RAISED BY TAXATION MAXIMUM LEVY ALLOWED FY 7 F— $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 I $186,780 $149,491 j Maximum assessment expense fund 1,071,401,534 x .00027 IPERS & FICA Funds = $ 289,27E Unemployment Compensation &= 16,460 Tort Liability Maximum for assessment expense fund _ —.— Maximum special appraisers fund 1,071 - $ 309,738 Maximum allowed without State a 401,534 x .000405= 433 918 pproval Maximum emergency fund 1 = $ 743,656 l (Which requires StateA901,534 x .00027 -_ Appeal ,534 Approval) $ 289,278 Maximum that could be raised by taxation for FY 188 _ $1,032,934 LEVIES AND RATES SINCE 1980 ASSessMent Expense Fund Fiscal Year ----�. Amount Levied Lev_ .02177 98,868 v Rate 1979-80 1980-81 $ 146,050 '26746 1981-82 175,930 184,145 .29593 1982-83 192,960 •30081 1983-84 201,186 .28004 1984-85 200,278 •27000 1985-86 1986-87 181,958 .22454 •18905 1987-88 186,780 149,491 .17616 13953 S ec al Ani2ral.serls Fu nd Amount Levied Lev —�- Rate $ 61,000 .09592 15,000 .02177 98,868 .13000 -----73,890-- --:08284- -/ fte CITY CONFERENCE BOARD JANUARY 26, 1987 City Conference Board: January 26, 1987, 7:00 P.M. In the Council Chambers at theCiv-Tc Center. Mayor 0111 Ambrlsco presiding. Iowa C1ty Councll Members Present: Ambrisco, Baker, Courtney, Dickson, MC00pali] r5t aim u r. Johnson County Supervisors Present: Donnelly, Myers, Ockenfels. Iowa City School Board Members Present: Townsend, Hooldrlk'. Others Present: Hudson, Atkins, Karr, Healing, Timmins. Tape Recorded: Reel 87-C4, Side 1, 3j6 -End and Side 2, 1-15. Mayor Ambrlsco stated that a quorum was present. The County moved to accept the minutes of the last Conference Board meeting, February 10, 1986, School seconded, and motion passed, 3/0. City Assessor Hudson presented his proposed FY '88 assessment expense fund budget. The major Increases being $2,000 for computer fees to Johnson County, $1,900 for Insurance, $%320 for FICA and $6,770 for a 5% Increase In wages.' The total budget Is going down due to three major decreases from the current FY, $4,500 for assessment rolls and Postage to mall them, $7,000 for the car which was purchased 4nd,$41,000 which has been carried forward for court cases. The bulk of the court cases were dismissed at the end of calendar 1986, therefore eliminating the need toteI amount toor cbearaised byltaxation Is dowhe n t for $29,150 fromcthescurrent year. The assessor's portion of taxes produced by new construction being taxed for the first time In FY 188 amounts to $2,370. The levy rate will go down from .17616 to .14597 for this proposed budget. Discussion was held about the salary Increase with the City favoring only a 3% Increase to fall In line with the Increases In other city wages. The City moved to decrease the salary Increase from 5% to 3%. County seconded,. and motion passed, 3/0. City Assessor Hudson then presented the proposed FY 188 special appraisers mapplhg which wlllpcostsapp oxlmatelyy$200,000 forgthetocity'suportion. The average house In lova City would pay $2.41 toward this $50,000. Discussion was held about the mapping and the consensus was that this was not a good time for a tax Increase for such a project. The board also felt that more discussion onthe need and on who Is available to do such a project was needed before any commitments of money are made. The City moved to remove the FY 188 special appraisers fund, County seconded, and motion passed„ 3/0.. The City moved to accept the proposed budget as amended for publl cation, County seconded, and motion passed, 3/0. The County moved to set the public hearing on the proposed budget for Monday, February 23, 1987 at 7:00 P.M. at the Iowa City Civic Center, School seconded, and motion passed, 3/0. There being no further business, It was moved by the County, seconded by the School, 'to adjourn at 7:20 P.M. Motion carried unanimously, 3/0. Dan L. Hudson plork, Conference Board 07 fpt Johnson County ACCAN (Area Council on Child Abuse & Neglect) P.O. Box 1043 Iowa City, Iowa 52244 TO: ORGANIZATIONS AND INDIVIDUALS CONCERNED ABOUT CHILD ABUSE AND NEGLECT IN OUR COMMUNITY FROM: CHRISTY SCHEETZ, SECRETARY, JOHNSON -COUNTY -AREA COUNCIL ON CHILD ABUSE AND NEGLECT RE: JC-ACCAN PUBLIC MEETING Briefs from January's public meeting: ACCAN formed several new committees --1) Bylaws/Membership, to consider formal membership procedures and resculutions by changes in the bylaws; 2) Grants/Needs committee, to consider what the needs are in this community, and what objectives ACCAN should set for grant proposals; 3) Conference com- mittee, to plan the spring mandatory reporter's conference. There are still openings on these committees for any interested individuals. We also discussed a desire for more input from area agencies as to which direction ACCAN should go. Grant proposals will be submitted to the state at the end Of May, and we would like to hear your thoughts about the needs in our com- munity. Please make every effort to attend the next public meeting. The February meeting will be held on February 25, 1987, at 12 noon, in Room A bf.-the Iowa City Public Library. For more information contact Linda Nelson at 338-7518 or Christy Scheetz at 354-4007. Hope to see you there. IF YOU ARE UNABLE TO ATTEND THE FEBRUARY MEETING P1.FASE TAKE SOME TIME TO OFFER YOUR THOUGHTS. FILL OUT AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION WITH YOUR SUGGESTIONS. THANK YOU FOR YOUR INPUT. What types of programs concerning child abuse and neglect do you think would ACCAN to consider? for grant be.meSC beneficial to our community? What is currently being done? Do you or your organization have any ideas proposals that you would like ass February 6, 1987 Mr. Fred Zehr Rirport Manager 910 East Uashington Street Iowa City, Iowa 52210 Bear Mr. Zehr: The Board of Supervisors re—appointed Bob Jensen to the Johnson County/Iowa City flirport Zoning Board of Rdlustnent on February S. 1987. This is for a tern expiring in 1992. Sincerely, 7 BettyL1-1c�(:c.�i G. Ockenfels Chair B0/lm cc: Mayor Rnbrisco Ennit George, Jr. Bob Jensen file li POHNSON RECEIVFp":-7L7 COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ADMINISTRATION BUILDING CITY CLERK IOWA CITY, IOWA 52244 PHONE: (319) 356,M BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ROBERTJ.BURNS . HAROLD M. DONNELLY DICK MYERS BETTY OCKENFELS DON SEHR February 6, 1987 Mr. Fred Zehr Rirport Manager 910 East Uashington Street Iowa City, Iowa 52210 Bear Mr. Zehr: The Board of Supervisors re—appointed Bob Jensen to the Johnson County/Iowa City flirport Zoning Board of Rdlustnent on February S. 1987. This is for a tern expiring in 1992. Sincerely, 7 BettyL1-1c�(:c.�i G. Ockenfels Chair B0/lm cc: Mayor Rnbrisco Ennit George, Jr. Bob Jensen file CITY OF CIVIC CENTER 410I O " ' ' ` CITY E. WASHINGTON ST, IOWA CITY, IOWA 52240 (319) 356-50C):) February 18, 1987 PRESS_ RELEASE Contact Persons: Mary Nugent Associate Planner 356-5248 Marianne Milkman CDBG Program Coordinator 356-5244 Re: 1986 Rental Housing Survey f The City has completed a report containing an analysis of vacancy rates and rents charged by landlords in the Iowa City and Coralville area, The analysis includes a number of variables such as: location of units, size Of units (number of bedrooms Per unit), the age of the structure, and the size of the apartment complex. The rental housing survey was conducted in April, 1986, and updated in November, 1986, to determine if there had been any significant seasonal changes or trends. Analysis of the data provides the following informa- tion: i - Total number of units surveyed in April, 1986 for Iowa City and Coral- ville area was 3,598. A follow-up survey of 808 rental units was con- ducted in November, 1986. 0797 V -2- Vacancy rates increase as the distance from the Iowa City Central Busi- ness District and the University of Iowa Pentacrest increases. Within one mile of the Pentacrest, the vacancy rate is 2.2%, apartments located within Iowa City but more than one mile from the Pentacrest have a vacancy rate of 4.8% while in Coralville there is an 11.15% vacancy rate. However, results from a sample survey of 808 units conducted in November, 1986, show that vacancy rates decreased in Coralville over the rates reflected in April. - Mean customary rent (including shelter, water, sewer and heat) for the various sizes of apartments were: r Unit Size 1986 1984 Efficiency $218 $214 1 -bedroom 291 282 #i 2 -bedroom 401 399 g� 3 -bedroom 546 531 4: A comparison of rents in April, 1984, and April, 1986, shows little is n'. :i change in the mean customary rent, whereas the U.S. Consumer Price Index %7 for rental housing costs increased by 13% during that period, k8 r; y? ,i - The sample survey of rents in November, 1986, shows little change from rents charged by the landlords in April 1966. In general, there is a correlation between the location of units and the 4? mean customary rent charged. Except for one -bedroom and three-bedroom units within one mile of the Pentacrest, rents are lower in the outlying areas. r i, X97 i -3- Within One More Than One Mile of Mile of Unit Size Pentacrest Pentacrest Coralville Efficiency $226 $210 $204 1 -bedroom 290 300 P78 2 -bedroom 421 397 381 3 -bedroom 543 571 499 Copies of the report are available to the public at the Department of Planning and Program Development, Commerce Center, 325 E. Washington Street, Iowa City, Iowa 52240. bj2/10 4$ Ocity MEMORANDUM TO: Iowa City City Council DAN: February 23, 1987 FROM: City Clerk Rf: Beer/Liquor License/Conditional Approval FOR YOUR INFORhIATION: Conditional approval was given to: Lotito's, 321 S. Gilbert College Street Club, 121 E. College Mickey's, 11 S. Dubuque R.T. Grunts, 826 S. Clinton Econofoods, 1987 Broadway Deli Mart, 525 Fhvy. 1 (Vest for �1 the Su day Sales/Liquor License. They have submitted after Y period, the required information them to retain their license. which allotvs �i f: �j c) is m z! x, -�i i! Ya ty 071,00 I The Library's Dilemma and the Board Decision An Explanation of the Decision to Reduce Services and Answers to Some Questions Recently Asked 2/3/87 The Iowa City Public Library is going to be closed Thursday evenings and all day Fridays beginning March 7 because City budget constraints will probably make it impossible for the library to employ necessary additional permanent staff. The decision to reduce hours rather than some other option is a controversial one, but one that the library board of trustees has considered very carefully. Following is a discussion of that decision and how it was reached, along with answers to some questions the library board recently has been asked. The board has determined that closing those eleven hours is the most appropriate form of service reduction to respond to the library's problems; closing will have the least negative impact on the public's use of the library and will go directly to pro- viding staff time to perform basic library operations essential for maintaining library services. Since the library moved to its new building in 1981, use has doubled, measured by such indicators as the numbers of people coming into the building and numbers of materials checked out. The number of permanent, full -time -equivalent (FTE) staff during that period has by only one FTE. In addition, increased five FTE temporary employees plus volunteers have been added primarily to check in and shelve books. After failing to get the 4.25 employees requested for the current Year and faced with a city budget that probably would not allow for increases next year, last spring the director, the staff, and the board began an extensive review of library priorities and procedures. As a result of that review, the board instituted service reductions that took effect in the fall of 1986 and the staff made some adjustments in the way work is performed. At the same time, the board tabled some planned objectives that would have involved staff time and might have resulted in increased use of the library. One of those objectives, for example, was the on-going effort to increase awareness and use of the library among the elderly and among those with limited reading or English speaking skills. With service adjustments made and library goals sacrificed, the board reduced the staff request from 4.25 to 2.5. These addi- tional employees are the minimum needed, and even that figure assumes no further growth in use of the library, The board reviewed many options, including charging fees for ser- vices, reduction of the library materials budget, and other forms of service reductions. It was the trustees conclusion that a reduction in hours would be the least detrimental to the public's use of the library and the easiest to restore when funds become A" available. Closing the library to the public on Thursday evening end all -day Friday will provide about 100 hours a week, the equi- valent of 2.6 employees, and the minimum time needed to keep up with essential backroom tasks. Reducing hours, the board believes, can be no ■ore than a temporary solution. The board has committed to work closely on the library's budget problems with the city council and citizen's committee proposed by the city manager. The library's problems are the result of citizen's demand for its services. A long-term solution to those problems must be respon- sive to that demand. Following are answers to some questions asked recently about the hours reduction. Why doesn't the library charge fees? It is a basic tenet of a democratic society that the public needs free access to all forms of information. This is a basic operat- ing principle of this library and most libraries and of all groups that support intellectual freedom.. Charging fees for access to information discriminates most against those citizens who most need that information to be free. Libraries always become very popular during hard economic times because people need information to get back on their feet and need the free, high-quality cultural experiences and entertainment that the library provides. Moreover, the library board long ago decided that instead of mandatory fees, money would be raised through voluntary contributions, gifts, grants, and fines. Fees for library services would reduce library use and discourage the dollars in private contributions the library now receives. If not fees, what has the library board done to assist with library funding? The library board has been quite successful at generating volun- tary contributions and has been firm about collecting fines. Income from library fines has grown from $19,000 in FY1981 to $66,000 in FY1986. The Library's oldest support organization, the Friends of the ICPL, contributes dollars, services, and mate- rials to the library in significant amounts. The ICPL Foundation has raised $376,000 toward a million dollar endowment fund and has received a $125,000 matching grant from the National Endow- ment for the Humanities. Finally, since 1981 more than $160,000 has been used from the library's gifts and bequests fund to pur- chase materials and equipment and some 12,000 items, worth over $100,000, have been added to the collection by direct gifts of materials. City government has given no more than inflationary increases to the library's materials budget since 1981. It was hoped when the new library opened that the library could help provide its own support for growth in the collection and the city would be able to provide needed staff. The library and its a 9' support groups have done extremely well in increasing the ■ateri- als budget. Now budget money for staff is needed to match that effort. Who is res oeible for cloain the libraryT It was the library board of trustees decision to reduce hours, not the city council. The council does have the ability to authorize additional employees and to provide funding that would keep the library open. nee a&_ ... _ Library employees are part of the bargaining unit with other city employees. Salaries are negotiated under a process directed and controlled by the city council and the union. The 2.5 FTS��1CID9' permanent employees are a bare minimum increase required just to keep the library open Thursday nights and Fridays this fiscal year, assuming no increases in use. The library needs at least 4.25 FTE Permanent staff just to catch up with the growth experienced since 1981. Have there been employees added at the library? Since 1981, the permanent library staff has increased one full-time equivalent from 25.75 FTE employees to 26.75 FTE employees. The board requested additional permanent FTE employees in 1981; in has every budget cycle FY1983, the library received authorization to three -quarter -time since extend a employee to full-time, an increase of mhas anent FTS. No other increase .25 per- in full-time permanent employees city tionalehalfrtimem(Og5iFTE)eemployeedwe, oins1983utoastaff1 addedIng the AV lab, funded out of the cable franchise fee. Another employeewas increased from half-time to three-quarter time the result of union as rules regarding hours worked. During thesame period, there has been an increase of an equivalent full-time temporary employees. of 5 Salaries for these employees are less skilled permanent employees and they than receive no benefits. Temporary employees require training and supervision from permanent employees. Overall, there has been an increase in temporary and about 19 permanent staff percent since 1981, while service indicators have increased 100 percent. Less than of 4 percent of this increase has been for permanent staff. nearly Can the -library use volunteers? The library already uses as many volunteers and temporary, unskilled workers as is feasible. These workers require training and supervision by permanent employees. a V9 What new service■ have been added? No new services except the audio-visual lab and a study room with aids for the handicapped have been added since the new library building opened in 1981. The AV lab is paid for by cable fran- chise fees. All existing services have grown, however, due to increased use. The changing ■ix of collection formats offered are a response to user needs and new technology.