HomeMy WebLinkAbout1987-06-16 Ordinance.o•
r
;i Pi
City of Iowa City
MEMORANDUM
Date: April 29, 1987
To: Planning & Zoning Commission
From: Barry Beagle, Associate Planner
Re: Proposed Large Scale Non -Residential Development Ordinance Amend-
ment
Proposed is an amendment to Section 27-44, Building Permits, of the Large
Scale Non -Residential Development (LSNRD) Ordinance. The proposed amend-
ment would allow for minor deviations in the size and siting of existing
buildings shown on approved final LSNRD plans. As the Commission will
recall, the LSNRD Ordinance was revised last year in an effort to stream-
line the review and approval of LSNRD plans and provide greater flexibil-
ity in the design and improvement of proposed developments. Deleted from
the revised text was language concerning permitted deviations from ap-
proved final plans which existed under the previous LSNRD ordinance.
The new LSNRD ordinance allows new developments to .set reasonable
parameters relating to the use, parking requirements, landscaping, access
points, and a footprint of each building within the development." For
plans approved under the previous LSNRD ordinance, minor deviations in
building size and location were permitted and no longer exist in the
revised ordinance. A number of plans exist that were approved under the
previous ordinance and no longer have the ability to make minor building
changes without having to amend their plans. The proposed amendment would
apply only to existing developments approved under the previous LSNRD
ordinance. New developments would not be affected by this proposal since
they have the option of setting reasonable parameters, with the prelimi-
nary plan, for future development in excess of current building needs.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
For the benefit of existing developments approved under the previous LSNRD
ordinance, staff would recommend the proposed ordinance amendment be
approved.
bdw1/2
Enclosure
Approved by:
onald chmeiser, Director
Department of Planning and
Program Development
gvi
.Y'
ORDINANCE NO.
ORDINANCE TO AMEND TIE LAAI;E SCALE NON-RESIDENTIAL
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, CHAPTER 27 OF THE IOA CITY
KNICIPAL CODE, TO ALLOW MINOR DEVIATIONS IN AP-
PIDVED FINAL OEVEI.OPMENT PLANS.
WEIEAS, the Large Scale Non -Residential Develop-
rnent Regulations were arended cn Pay 6, 1986, to
permit administrative review and approval of final
plans; and
WfJM, the nen Large Scale Nm -Residential
Developrent regulations allow new develq mats to
set reasonable parameters with respect to future
building use, coverage, parking requirements, etc.,
at the time of preliminary plan approval; and
W1EfEAS, developers of plans approved under the
previous Large Scale Nm -Residential Development
regulations no longe- have the ability to make minor
deviations in the size and siting of buildings
without having to formally armed the plans; and
WEWM, it is the intent of the Large Scale
Non -Residential Development regulations to provide
lard owners and developers with the ability to
respond quickly to new or existing business propos-
als; and
WEWAS, the proposed amrehdneht would re-estab-
lish the standards permitting minor deviations to
approved plans vhich existed under the previous
Large Scale Non-leside tial Development regulations,
and would apply only to such developneeds.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BI THE CITY COUN-
CIL OF THE CITY OF IOA CITY, IOWA, THAT:
SECTION I. AME W. That Section 27-44 of the
Iawa_iiy o irenkes, entitled: Building
Permits, shall be amended by inserting the following
new section:
(c) For final development plans approved prior to
May 6, 1985, a building permit may be issued
for a building sham on the approved plan which
deviates by up to twenty-five (25) percent of
the gross floor area shown for the original
building, provided the footprint of the build-
ing does not exceed the permitted lateral
deviation listed below:
Total Area of Permitted
Development Lateral
Tract Deviation
Up to 10 Acres 25 feet
10-25 Acres 50 feet
Over 25 Acres 75 feet
1410/
Ordinance No.
Page 2
If deviations in building size or siting beyond
these limitations are desired, approval of a
modified site plan is required in accordance
with the provision of Section 21-37 of this
Chapter.
SECTION II. REPEALER: All Ordinances and
parts of ordinances m conflict with the provi-
sion of this Ordinance are hereby repealed.
SECTION III. SEVERABILITY: If any section,
prov srm on par a Ordinance shall be
adjudged to be invalid or unconstitutional,
such adjudication shall not affect the validity
of the Ordinance as a whole or any section,
provision or part thereof not adjudged invalid
or unconstitutional.
SECTION IV. EFFECTIVE DATE: This Ordinance
shalln effect a-fFe-Flits final passage,
approval and publication as required by law.
Passed and approved this
MAYOR
ATIESI:
CITY ULW
ra i
Recah•�9 1:;•rvoved
By I'm L•_;;al is r. ar"enf
got
.W
V
It was moved by and seconded by
that the Ordinance as read e a op ed and upon roll call there were:
AYES: NAYS: ABSENT:
AMBRISCO
BAKER
COURTNEY
DICKSON
MCDONALD
STRAIT
ZUBER
First consideration
Vote for passage:
Second consideration
Vote for passage
Date published
5014
.o•
f
4jj
City of Iowa City
MEMORANDUM
Date: April 16, 1987
To: Planning and Zoning Commission
From: Monica Moen, Associate Planner M�
Re: Amendments to the Sign Regulations Concerning Signs Permitted in the
CH -1, CC -2 and CI -1 Zones and in the I-1 and I-2 Zones.
The sign regulations of the Zoning Ordinance permit, by right, either one
monument sign or one free-standing sign on a single lot within the CH -1, CC -2,
and CI -1 zones and within the I-1 and I-2 zones. Sections 36-62(c)(3)b.2 and
36-62(c)(6)b.2 of the Ordinance, however, specifically allow two monument signs
or two free-standing signs in the applicable zones where a minimum distance
Fetween the signs can be achieved. These regulations do not, however,
expressly permit the use of a combination of one monument sign and one free-
standing sign on a single lot which can meet the present minimum separation
requirement.
Because a combination of one monument sign and one free-standing sign within
the applicable zones and on lots meeting a minimum frontage dimension is not
expected to be visually objectional or to compromise the intentions of the of
the sign regulations, the proposed amendments are intended to specifically
permit two monument signs, two free-standing signs or one monument sign and one
free-standing sign on lots having a minimum frontage dimension and located in
the CH -1, CC -2, and CI -1 zones and in the I-1 and I-2 zones.
The present regulations allow two free-standing or monument signs within the
CH -i, CC -2 and CI- 1 zones and the I-1 and I-2 zones provided that the distance
between the two signs is not less than 150 feet measured along the frontage of
a single lot. This provisional regulation allows a reasonable amount of identi-
fication for businesses located on lots which have substantial frontage but
limits the number of signs to two on any single lot, regardless of the amount
of frontage, in order to protect the physical appearance of the community, to
protect property values and to reduce distractions or visual obstructions that
may contribute to traffic accidents.
The proposed amendments continue to limit the number of monument or free-stand-
ing signs on a single lot to two but they impose a provision that allows two of
these signs on a single lot only when that lot has a minimum lot frontage of
160 feet. Except for two free-standing signs on a single lot, the amendments
eliminate the provision requiring a minimum distance between either two monu-
ment signs or one monument sign and one free-standing sign. While general rules
apply to the dimensions and locations of these signs, placement of two monument
signs or a combination of one monument and one free-standing sign in relation
to one another is left to the discretion of the property owner. These amend-
ments offer property owners more flexibility in locating signs on a parcel.
94' 7
.W
r
2
The 150 foot minimum distance between two free-standing signs is retained
because of the more obtrusive characteristics of free-standing signs versus
monument signs. Within the zones under consideration, free-standing signs may
be constructed to aheight of 25 feet and within the commercial zones, in par-
ticular, the area of each sign face of a free-standing sign may be up to 125
j square feet. Monument signs, on the other hand, have a much lower profile.
fet
a
Monument
tsigns within
nthe b
ndthemorelen lenient numentsign regulations oofethee1-1 andgI-2ozones estill
restrict each sign face to an area of 75 square feet. Restricting free-stand-
ing signs within 150 feet of one another is intended to protect the appearance
i
and safety of the community.
Because Section 36-63(b)(2) generally provides that no part of a free-standing
or a monument sign or sign support may be within five feet of any lot line,
only lots with a minimum frontage of 160 feet (5 foot setback + 150 foot sepa-
ration + 5 foot setback = 160 feet) would be capable of accommodating two
monument signs, two free-standing signs or a combination of one of each type of
sign. The 160 foot distance is, therefore, utilized in the proposed amendments
to identify the threshold at which a second monument or free-standing sign
would be permitted on a single lot.
The staff recommends adoption of the ordin nces-submitted.
Approved by: Lam'
na c me ser, irec or
irector of Planning &
Program Development
tp5/1
Attachments
J0
ORDINAI�E N). �_
Ofmitwa TO RUID TIE SIGN {7E(;A ATIOIS CF 11-E
ZONING ORDINKEC�ERNINGZONES PId)� TIE 1-1DW 11-7
VE
CH -1, CC -2 XV
ZOIES. the Sign Regulations are intended to
and
enhance and Protect the fhysical popetY � alnes.
safety of the conmmobstructions that may
tY, to Poproper
and to reduce distractions and obstructions
contribute� to he Sign �ulatioand
nss establish Prw
able opportunity 11
dch
sions vhallow a reason
sign users to display signsfor r identnfand to
without
interference fron other signage ed
' provide for fair and equitable treabnent of all sign
users-�, vhile the Sign Regulations allow reason-
able arount of identifncatmt for acedcerton lotcams
and industrial establishments looted r lots re -
have substantial frontage. it s single
to'W
strict the m� of signs on a sing
on t
ate the effects of signsthe environment and on
traffic' and lots with substantial frontage it is
reasonable to allow Property owners flexibility in
�I locating signs on a single parcel.
NOW, DEREFCRE, M IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF
IOWA CITY: NUVWFS• That Section
SECTION I'e @-e-OT Ordinances shall be
36 c ° inserting in
I amended by deleting said Section and
lieu thereof the following:
2. Two free standing x' mo nunent signs or one free -
7
f re an t signare permitted
Provided that frontage along a single lot is ntwo
ot
less than 160 feet• Theall be nodes t� )50
free-standing signs l� frontage of a single
feet as measured alorg
lot. 6 b 2 of the Code of Ordi-
That Section 36-62(c)( )
nances shall be anerddeleting said Section and
ed by
inserting in lieu thereof the followtwo ing: or
2. In the I-1 and 1-2 zones,
noruiat signsareor pem tted provid one free-standi
snthat front
than 160 feet -
age along a single lot is rot lessstardirg signs
The distance be br7 free
P. shall be ro less than 150 feet as measured along
the frontage of a single lot. parts
SECTION II. IwEPEAIFR. All ordinances of this
of ord na%es n con ct with the provision
ordinance are hereby repealed.
V* 7
z
SECTION III. SEVERABILITY. If any section,
Provision or part of the Ordinance shall be adjudged
to be invalid or unconstitutional, such adjudication
shall not affect the validity of the Ordinance as a
whole or any section, Provision or part thereof not
adjudged invalid or unconstitutional.
SECTION IV. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance
shall be in effect after its final Passage, approval
and publication as required by law.
Passed and approved this
puff -
ATTEST:
hued Approved
of !hn
/9/��
P.
S�7
It was moved by and seconded by
that the Ordinance as rea e a op ed and upon roll call there were:
AYES: NAYS: ABSENT:
AMBRISCO
—BAKER
— COURTNEY
— DICKSON
MCDONALD
— STRAIT
ZUBER
First consideration
Vote for passage:
Second consideration
Vote for passage
Date published
04
OiOINAHE &0. 87-3326
A' VVt,EHT TO TME ZONING ORDINANCE CHANGING 74E USE
REGULATIONS OF PFDPERRY LOCATED AT 225 EAST MNTISS
STREET FROM CC -2 lO CI -1, SUBIECT TO C@aITIOPS.
4IEREAS, Ha„keye Medical Supply, inc., located
at 225 East Prentiss Street, has requested that its
Property be rezoned fran CC -2 to CI -1; and
WEREAS, the Comprehensive Plan for the City of
Iowa City shows Mixed Use in the area containing the
subject parcel; and
IJEREAS, the existing development near the
subject parcel is devoted to residential and conmer-
cial land uses as recognized by the Carprehensive
Plan; and
WEREAS, subject to conditions, the rezoning of
the subject parcel would Ensure compatibility of the
I present use with surrounding land uses and with the
intent of the Comprehensive Plan.
NOW, 14EREFORE, BE IT OR)AIPED BY THE CITY COIN -
CIL OF TIE CITY OF IOWA CITY, 101iA, THAT:
SECTION I. ZONING *UMW. Subject to the terms
a c n ions o attached AgreEmnt, which is
hereby approved, the property described below is
hereby reclassified from its Present classification
of CC -2 to CI -1:
Lots 1-4, Block 10 of Canty Seat Addition.
I SECTION II. ZONING MAP. Upon final passage, ap-
P� Pubhcatim o this Ordinance as provided
by law, the Building Inspector is hereby authorized
and directed to change the zoning rrep of the City of
Tara City to reflect this amendment.
SECTION III. AGREEMENT. The Mayor is hereby au-
7W0-r-1-eT-a-r2-afFRYeM sign, and the City Clerk to
attest, the Agreement.
SECTION IV. CERTIFICATION NO RECORDING. The City
Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to certify a
copy of this Ordinance which, together with the
Agreernent, shall be recorded in the Office of the
County Recorder of Johnson Canty, Iowa.
SECTION V. o REPEALER: All Ordinances and parts of mantes nn can mct with the provision of this
Ordinance are hereby repealed.
SECTION VI. SEVERABILITY: If any section, provi-
s on or Parr ot the Ordinance shall be adjudged to
be invalid or unconstitutional, such adjudication
shall not affect the validity of the Ordinance as a
whole or any section, Provision or Part thereof not
adjudged invalid or unconstitutional.
Ordinance No. 87-3326
Page 2
SECTION VII. EFFECTIVE DATE: This Ordinance shall
be in effect after its final passage, approval and
publication as required by law.
Passed and approved this 16th day of June,
1987.
Y
ATTEST:
CITY CLEW
Rarivc'd �° Apprc...::.
By '! LPSfa! P'6 n
S�`
It was moved by McDonald
, and seconded by Strait_+
that the Ordinance as read be a opted and upon roll ca there were.
AYES: NAYS: ABSENT:
AMBRISCO
X -- BAKER
X COURTNEY
X — DICKSON
X MCDONALD
K STRAIT
X X ZUBER
First consideration 6/2/87
Vote for
Zuber9 - Ayeco.eaNays Co�oneey bsent n None.
onald,
Second consideration -
Vote for passage
Date published 6/24/87
Moved by McDonald, seconded by Dickson, that the
rule requiring ordinances to be considered and
rior
voted on for passage at two Council meetings p
to the meeting at which it is to be finally passed
be suspended, the second consideration and vote
be waived and the ordinance be voted
euponion for
final
passage at this time. Ayes:
McDonald, Strait, Ambrisco, Baker. Nays: None,
Absent: ZUber.
CMMMK Zgli AGEUM
A611EEWNT by and between the City of Iowa City, Two (City) and Hawkeye
Medical Supply Inc. (Hawkeye).
WHEREAS, Hawkeye operates a medical equipment and supply business on property
at 225 E. Prentiss Street, Iwo City, Johnson County, Iowa, which Is legally
described as follows:
Lots 1-4, Block 10, County Seat Addition (the 'Property-); and
WHEREAS; Hawkeye cannot expand Its warehouse at that location because of
limitations on the amount of warehouse space permitted under the present
zoning classification: CC -2; and
WHEREAS. Hawkeye has applied to have the Property rezoned to the C1-1 classl-
flcatlon, which permits a greater amount warehouse space; and
WHEREAS, reclassification of the Property to the Cl -1 zoning classif station
Is deemed reasonable and proper If certain conditions are lepsed on uses on
the Property to ameliorate the negative Impacts of some uses Mich are per-
mitted in that zone; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to authority contained in Iowa Code (1985) section 414,5,
the parties agree that the conditions described below are reasonable and
necessary to protect against potential adverse effects, such as visual blight
and Increased noise, which certain activities permitted In the CI -I zone
could have on adjacent properties Mich are zoned for commercial and MIti_
family use.
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:
1, No outdoor storage and/or display of merchandise, supplies, materials or
equipment shall be permitted on the Property.
2. Except during loading and unloading of materials and supplies, and except
for off-street parking associated with use of the Property, all activl-
ties and operations of the Property shall be conducted within a com-
pletely enclosed building or buildings.
3. Violations of the terms of this Agreement shall be, and shall be deemed
to be, violations of the City's Zoning Ordinance.
.W
.2-
a. This Agreement shall be effective on the effective date Of the City's
ordinance rezoning the proeerty from CC -2 to C1-1. If such rezoning 'i
not adopted, this Agreement shall be null and void.
5. This Agreement snail be a covenant running with the land, and snall be
binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the parties hereto, and
their successors and assigns.
HAWKEYE MEDICAL ��S/UP,P/�Y, hit, r�TY OF IOWA CITY IOWA `
3 �&ZkyN. jlA%�iJ
y• s Tres ldent Theodore H. Pada ayor
ATTEST: ATTEST:
Sedretdry VirJci Ol¢shar ICy erk
State of Iowa )
) SS:
Johnson County )
On this 29@i—day of s l9 s7 before me, ap-
andersigne a diary Pub c to an or e State' ofT>wa,x personally ap-
peared 7lscddore H. Pada and Vicki Dunbar , to me person-
al ly
erson-ally known, who, being ly me duly sworn, say QFey are the
p�y��� and respectively, of s I corpo�on
executing the with n and drego ng nstrIs attached, that
`moeoptortoiwhttehatisa said instrument was
signed (aid scaled) on behalf of (the seal affixed thereto is the seal of
said) said corporation by authority of its Board of Directors; and that the
said ma)dora H. Pada and Vicki Dunbar as such
officers acknowledged the execution or STU Jnrrumen=* e(Fe voluntary
act and deed of said to oration, by it and by them voluntarily executed.
o1✓—car uo c n� or s� an ate
State of Iowa
SS:
Johnson County )
On this 16th day of J=c , 1987 , before me. Gina
a otary ub c n and foF the State of Iowa, PersonaTTY
appeare— d w1111am�J. Anbrisco and Marian K. Karr, to me personally known, and,
who, being by me duly sworn, did say that they are the Mayor and City Clerk,
respectively, of the City of lad City, Iowa; that the seal affixed to the
for,
Instrument is the corporate seal of the corporation, and that the
Instrument was signed and sealed on behalf of the corporation,
by87by utho ity
of its City Council, as contained in (Ordinance) (ke%,o vbLxK4
passed (the Resolution adopted) by the City Council, acdmc£o1.Sr.Ca 'ccQ
of the City Council on the 16th day of Jime
TT 87 and that William J. Anbr Isco an ar an K. Karr n
ac a ged the
exon of the instrument to be their voluntary act and deed and the volun-
tary act and deed of the Corporation,
by IC voluntarily executed.
P., up i�v Otty Ehio":
•
a
OROIWM NO. 87-3327
AN OIDINACE MENDING SECTION 20-19((d) OF THE CODE
OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF I0A CITY, IM.
EE IT OROAINEO BY T}E CITY COLNCIL OF RE CITY OF
10 A CLTY, IOIdA, THAT:
SECTION I. PURPOSE. The purpose of this anerdent
ns to reale ron 6 to 4 the writer of consecutive
regular nmetings of the Library Board Which a trus-
tee can be absent before that trustee's position
shall be vacant.
SECTION II. NUDIENT. Section 20-19(d) of the
Cade of Ordinances of the City of Iowa City, Iowa,is hereby repealed and substituted in its place is
the nen section 20-19(d):
(d) Vacancies. The position of any trustee shall be
vacant if he/she roves penrenently from the
city, or county in case of a ron-resident
rrenbe; or if be/she is absent for four (4)
consecutive regular meetings of the board.
Vacancies on the board shall be filled by
�
council, of the
il,or theboard , i
th the ofsupervisapproval
of
supervisors in the
case of the non-resident member, and the ap-
pointed trustee shall fill out the unexpired
teen for vhich the appoinbnent is rade.
SECTION III. IEPEALER: All ordinances and parts of
mantes n 5 T with the provision of this
ordinance are hereby repealed.
SECTION IV. SEVERABILITY: If any section, provi-
son or part OFEFWIWTmance shall be adjudged to
be invalid or unconstitutional, such adjudication
shall not affect the validity of the Ordinance as a
Whole or any section, provision or part thereof not
adjudged invalid or unconstitutional.
SECTION V. EFFECTIVE DATE; This Ordinance shall be
in effect afte its incl passage, approval and
Publication as required by law,
1aas8 ed and approved this 16th day of June,
1
.o•
R
ATTEST:dm ) -�J��)
Rsosfvsd it fliresVod
By Tiro legsi Gia;.,%"msM
7
[t was moved by Baker
that the mance as rea ' and seconded by
were: a a opted and Courtne
upon rol ca t ere
AYES:
XAYi :1Bggyf:
X A BRISCO
_
BAKER
X
X '
COURTYEY
DICKSON
X MCDONAW
—� STRAIT
_ x ZUBER
First consideration 6/2/87
Vote for passage: Ayes: Strait Zuber I
Courtney, Dickson, McDonald. Ambrisco, Baker,
'Nays: None. Absent: None.
Second consideration I
Vote for passage
Date published 6/ 4/87
Moved by Baker, seconded by Strait, that the rule
requiring ordinances to be considered and voted
on for passage h th Council meetings prior to
the meeting at which it is to be finally passed
be suspended, the second consideration and vote
be waived and the ordinance be voted upon for
final passage at this time. Ayes: Courtney,
Dickson, McDonald, Strait, Ambrisco, Baker.
Nays: None. Absent: Zuber.
FAF
i
I
I
I
I
.V•
OIMINPNCE N0. 87-3328
AN OFmIWWCE WENDING SECTION 23-253 OF TrE CODE OF
OR3IWWCES OF THE CITY OF IOWA CITY, IDA -
SECTION 1. PURPOSE. The purpose of this anend-
nent is to provide that it is unlawful for unauthor-
ized vehicles to Park in a handicapped parking space
on private Property, as well as on public property.
SECTION2__Nf. Section 23-253 of the
Code_of Ordinani� o thubstituof Dow its City, IOAs
andis hereby repea
ce i
the new 523-253:
Sec. 23-253. Parking for physically handi-
capped
(a) The traffic engineer is hereby authorized
to establish handicapped parking spaces for
s and off-
streeton-street
public parkingirf facilities. Handi-
capped parking spaces aey also be estab-
lished on private Property by the owns• of
said property provided that each parking
space is clearly and prominently designated
s handicappedrricie ng space, located
king space. The use of
aon
either public or private property, by a
rotor vehicle not displaying a handicapped
identification device, or by a rotor vehi-
cle displaying such a device but not being
used try a handicapped person, as operator
or passenger, shall be unlavful.
(b) The terns "handicapped Person", "handi-
atdttstarhd "handicapped
identification device" as used in
section, shall have the meaning as those
terns are defined in Section 601E.1, Code
of Iowa.
SECTION III. PEPFALER: All ordinances and parts
Of ordnances in c ct with the provisions of
this ordinance are hereby repealed.
SECTION IV. SEVERABILITY: If any section,
�ro�vi to be invalid or
shall e
ad -
or unconstitutonal,such
adjudication shall not affect the validity of the
Ordinance as a whole or any section, provision or
part thereof of adjudged invalid or unconstitu-
tional.
SECTION V. EFFECTIVE DATE: This Ordinance shall
be n e a er i ins passage, approval and
publication as required by law.
Passed and approved this 16th day of June,
1987.
ATTEST:
CI IT U -M
•i. J' G
877
.P'
•
It was moved by McDonald and seconded by Strait
that the Ordinance as ria be a op id and upon roll callt ere were:
AYES: NAYS: ABSENT:
X AMBRISCO
X BAKER
X COURTNEY
X DICKSON
X MCDONALD
X STRAIT
X ZUBER
First consideration 6/2/87
Vote for passage: Ayes: Zuber, Ambrisco, Baker, Courtney,
Dickson, McDonald, Strait. Nays: None. Absent: None.
Second consideration -------
Vote for passage
Date published _ 6/24/87
Moved by McDonald, seconded by Courtney, that
the rule requiring ordinances to be considered Rmlved b Appeved
and voted on for passage at two Council Legal DepeAffyd
meetings prior to the meeting at which The
it is to be finally passed be suspended, 5 % 9
the second consideration and vote be
waived and the ordinance be voted upon
for final passage at this time.
Ayes: Dickson, McDonald, Strait, Ambrisco,
Baker, Courtney. Nays: None. Absent:
Zuber.
71