The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1987-06-30 Resolution3 �C•a) RESOLUTION NO. 87-149 RESOLUTION TO ISSUE CIGARETTE PERMITS WFO?REAS, the following firms and persons have made application and paid the mulct tax required by law for the sale of cigarettes and cigarette papers; therefore, tN t+ BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF I01VA CITY, IOWA, that the o applications be granted and the City Clerk be and he/she is hereby directed to issue a permit to the following named persons and firms to sell ciagrette papers and cigarettes: See attached list. It was moved by McDonald and seconded by Strait that the Resolution as rea e a Opte , and upon roll call there were: AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: Ambrisco X Baker X _ i Courtney X — Dickson X McDonald X Strait X Zuber X f j Passed and approved this 30th day of June 1987 I , i bay0r IJJ II,, Attest:MpV— City Clerk 90.a .1. c CIGARETTE PERMITS PRINTED: 8—JUN-87 PAGE: 1 DOING BUSINESS AS PURPOSE 6.20 STICKER NO. 86-87(03158) l AIRLINER, THE ISTICKER #05797 .AM—PM MINI MART STICKER #05798 AMELON'S SERVICES, INC. STICKER #05799 AMERICAN LEGION ROY CHOPEK #17 STICKER #05800 BARFUNKEL'S & THE HOBBY SHOP STICKER #05864 BILL'S I-80 DX STICKER NO. 86-87 (03146) BILLARO'S BAR OLD # WAS 86-3 BILLY'S STICKER NO. 86-87 (03121) t %BO—JAMES STICKER NO. 86-87 (03130) BOB BELL'S STANDARD STICKER #05866 BROWN BOTTLE, THE BURGE HALL — RESIDENCE SERVICES STICKER NO. 86-87(03173) CAMPUS STANDARD SERVICE STICKER #05801 • CARLOS O'KELLY'S STICKER #05802 CENTRAL CIGARETTES r rWTG41 pH4RM4f V f`FNTFR LICENSE # 85 00104 1( 86 00026 85 00041 85 00043 86 00025 is 86 00029 85 00090 87 00022 86 00019 '�'OriC�cli 85 00074 85 00119 87 00001 85 00132 86 00021 87 00015 87 00016 '#-058(,; )( RS nnn7q trio 0 .o• STICKER #05856 CIGARETTE PERMITS PRINTED: 8 -JUN -87 PAGE: 2 DOING BUSINESS AS PURPOSE COACHES CORNER LOUNGE STICKER NO. 86-87 (03134) COLLEGE STREET CLUB COLONIAL LANES STICKER 005803 I COMER'S STICKER #05804 COUNTRY KITCHEN iSTICKER NO. 86-87 (03132) DAN'S MUSTANG MARKET STICKER #05805 DAN'S SHORT STOP CORPORATION STICKER #05806 DEADWOOD STICKER NO. 86-87 (03148) DELI MART STICKER #05807' DELI MART #2 CIGARETTES DIAMOND DAVE'S TACO Co. STICKER #05863 i DOC'S STANDARD STICKER NO. 86-87(03149) DONUTLAND STICKER NO. 86-87(03167) DOOLEY'S STICKER N0, 86-87(03165) DRUGTOWN #1 STICKER 005822 DRUGTOWN #2 STICKER #05823 n11pI1nIIF 4Tp�GT ppFWlNln rn LICENSE # i 85 00151Orj 87 00006 85 00003 1 1 87 00014 85 00077n 86 00001 86 00022 85 00092 n5�j9 87 00013 87 00018 85 00044 85 00093'�75`a�i 86 00007 :11.USQU� I �- 85 00012 85 00013 R �O .P• r i CIGARETTE PERMITS PRINTED: 8 -JUN -87 PAGE: 3 DOING BUSINESS AS PURPOSE EAGLE CLUB AERIE #695 STICKER NO. 86-87 (03142) EAGLE SUPERMARKET #157 STICKER #05808 EAGLE SUPERMARKET #220 STICKER #05809 EAST -WEST ORIENTAL FOODS STICKER #05865 ECONOFOODS #473 STICKER #05869 ELKS #590 STICKER #05810 FEDERAL BLDG. - SNACK SHOP STICKER #05811 FIELD HOUSE STICKER NO. 86-87 (03129) FINKBINE GOLF COURSE STICKER #05867 FITZPATRICK'S STICKER NO. 86-87(03150) FOXHEAD TAVERN STICKER NO. 86-87 (03143) GASE'S STICKER.#05815 GAS COMPANY INN GEORGE'S BUFFET STICKER #05812 GIVANNI'S STICKER NO. 86-87 (03118) GOLDEN OLDIE CIGARETTES ra:r.irn, c LICENSE # 85 00030 x#05 908 85 00004 i 65 00005 85 00112 87 00010 85 00033 85 00026 i 85 00073 85 00129 85 00094 -*05901 85 00023 85 00148 87 00002 _II'Oriril�i� 85 00017 86 00005 87 0002305 885 90 0871 X --- I .P' J STICKER NO. 86-87 (03141) i CIGARETTE PERMITS PRINTED: 8 -JUN -87 PAGE: 4 i DOING BUSINESS AS j PURPOSE i 1 A? fEffRS".I'h!M-+2 ) HARRIS DISCOUNT STICKER #05816 HARRY'S DODGE STREET DX i STICKER #05817 HIGHLAND AVENUE OX STICKER NO. 86-87 (03127) HIGHLANDER MOTOR INN STICKER #05818 l- HILLTOP DX STICKER #05813 HILLTOP TAVERN STICKER NO. 86-87 (03120) HOLIDAY INN STICKER NO. 86-87 (03119) HOLLYWOOD'S STICKER NO. 86-87 (03114) HUNGRY HOBO STICKER NO. 86-87 (03133) HY-VEE FOOD STORE #1 STICKER 405819 1 HY-VEE FOOD STORE #2 STICKER #05820 HY-VEE FOOD STORE #3 STICKER #05821 • IOWA MEMORIAL UNION STICKER #05868 IOWA OIL COMPANY STICKER #05814 LICENSE # 85 00038 i 85 00032 i 85 00122 f 85 00069 85 00070 85 00125 86 00012_4-0 B 74 X 86 00011 86 00015 85 00154 85 00146 79� 65881 Y ! 85 00009 85 00010 85 00011 85 00130 BG 00031 *9 JO. CO. JAIL COMMISSARY STICKER #05826 CIGARETTE PERMITS PRINTED: 8 -JUN -87 PAGE: 5 DOING BUSINESS AS PURPOSE JOE'S PLACE STICKER NO. 87-03170 JOHN'S GROCERY STICKER #05824 K -MART STICKER #05827 KIRKWOOD '76 STICKER #05825 KITTY HAWK STICKER NO. 86-87(03152) KUM & GO #104 STICKER #05859 KUM & GO #422 STICKER #05860 L&M MIGHTY SHOP, INC. STICKER #05828 LEO'S STANDARD SERVICE STICKER #05829 j I MA000'S STICKER N0. 86-87(03166) MAID -RITE CORNER .o• I STICKER #05830 --M i MAMA CAPONE'S STICKER NO. 86-87 (03122) j MAMA'S STICKER N0. 86-87(03153) MICKY'S STICKER NO. 86-87 (03125) Mil 1 RFRT4IIR4NT 85 00035 LICENSE # 85 00118 jrQJga'3 X "r 85 00054 85 00140 85 00135 00135 85 0009705°�Qa X 85 00024 85 00025 85 00045 85 00027 Be 00008_µp5 86 00002 86 00032 85 00099 85 00064 R�i nnr„s88.I .o• r STICKER NO. 86-87 (03126) CIGARETTE PERMITS PRINTED: 8 -JUN -87 PAGE: 6 DOING BUSINESS AS PURPOSE a MOOSE LODGE #1096 MOTT'S DRUG STORE STICKER #05831 MUMM'S STICKER NO. 86-87 (03123) MY SISTERS OSCO DRUG #448 STICKER #05832 OWENS BRUSH CO. STICKER NO. 86-87 (03140) PAUL'S HARDWARE STICKER NO. 86-87(03154) PEARSON'S DRUG STORE STICKER #05841 PEOPLES DRUG 05276 STICKER #05857 PEOPLES DRUG #5281 STICKER #05858 PESTER DERBY #58 STICKER #05861 PESTER DERBY 059 STICKER #05862 PLAMOR LANE STICKER NO. 86-87 (03124) QUADRANGLE - RESIDENCE SERVICES STICKER NO. 8G-87(03172) QUIKTRIP #503 STICKER #05833 QUIKTRIP #509 RTTr'KFP :Im SRR4 LICENSE # '85--8989-? 87 00005} 85 00051 85 00062 K. 87 00003 85 00116 85 00053 �}�Jq �� ✓ 85 00100p59o� 85 00048 85 00007 85 00006 87 00019 87 00020 85 00063S1SV %�___X 85 85 00018 85 00019 foAr .o• CIGARETTE PERMITS PRINTED: 8 -JUN -87 PAGE: 7 DOING BUSINESS AS PURPOSE QUIKTRIP #539 STICKER #05835 QUIKTRIP #548 STICKER #05836 QUIKTRIP #552 STICKER #05837 R.T. GRUNTS STICKER NO. 86-87(03151) RANDALL'S STICKER #05838 REVCO DISCOUNT DRUG CENTER STICKER #05842 ROSSIE'S CAFE STICKER NO. 86-87(03155) RUSS' STANDARD STICKER #05840 SANCTUARY STICKER NO. 86-87(03156) SEATON'S CASH & CARRY MARKET STICKER #05839 SENOR PABLOS STICKER NO. 86-87(03157) SEVEN -ELEVEN STORE #18048 STICKER 405843 SHELLER GLOBE STICKER NO. 86-87 (03139) SINCLAIR MARKETING STICKER #05844 SINCLAIR MARKETING STICKER #05845 SPORTS COLUMN STICKER NO. 86-87(03159) LICENSE # 85 00020 85 00021 85 00022 q 85 00096 0590 1 % t i 85 00034 85 00128 85 00101 85 00137 i 85 00102 85 00036 85 00103 , d o5q I I 85 00084 p 85 00052 85 00126 85 00127 85 0010505�,olL .o. r . STUDIO 114 NEW i I I CIGARETTE PERMITS PRINTED: 8 -JUN -87 PAGE: 8 I DOING BUSINESS AS PURPOSE i SUPER SPIRITS SHOP STICKER #05846 T&M MINI MART STICKER #05847 THE THIRD COAST i- STICKER 005870 i TIC TOC STICKER #05848 TOWNCREST DX SERVICE STICKER #05849 i TOWNCREST INN STICKER NO. 86-87 (03102) TUCK'S PLACE STICKER #05850 VFW #3949 STICKER NO. B6-87(03160) VILLAGE INN STICKER NO. B6-87(03161) VINE STICKER NO. 86-87(03162) VITO'S STICKER NO. 86-87 (03117) VITOSH STANDARD STICKER #05851 WALGREENS STICKER #05852 WARECO STICKER #05653 WATT'S FOOD MARKET STICKER #05854 YEN CHING RESTAURANT STICKER #05855 87 00024 X05895 LICENSE # 87 00021 85 00085 85 00147 87 00011 I 85 00049 1 86 00028=_ 85 00042 85 00107 85 00108�� G�5 85 00109 p 5 85 00114 85 00029 85 00016 85 00083 85 00047 Denny's Restaurant V.C.'s Lounge, LTD Second Place Sturgell Hotels, Inc. (dba Howard Johnson Lodge) #88-01 #88-02 #88-03 H88-04 i I n I RESOLUTION NO. 87-150 I RESOLUTION TO ISSUE DANCING PERMIT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF IOWA CITY, IOWA, that a Dancing Permit as provided by law is hereby granted to the following named person and at the following described locations upon his filing an application, having endorsed thereon the certificates of the proper city officials as to having complied with all regulations and ordinances, and having a valid Class "B" Beer Permit or liquor control license, to wit: Iowa City Aerie #695, Fraternal Order of Eagles, 225 Kvy. i #1 South. (18'x281, 17'x341, 491x601, 191x341) i Vit0's of Iowa City, Inc. dba Vito's, 118 E. College St. .o• It was moved by MDona and seconded by Strait that the Resolution as rea e ado pted, and upon rol ca t ere were: AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: i i Ambrisco X Baker X � I Courtney X I Dickson X McDonald X j Strait X Zuber X i Passed and approved this 30th day of June 19 87 , i Mayor I Attest: City Clerk 903 .P' RESOLUTION NO. 87-151 RESOLUTION OF INTENT TO CONVEY TO IOWA CITY LAW BUILDING PARTNERSHIP THE PORTION OF THE NORTH -SOUTH ALLEY BETWEEN BENTON STREET AND RALSTON CREEK, WEST OF GILBERT STREET. WHEREAS, the City has no need for the unimproved portion of the north -south alley between Benton Street and Ralston Creek, west of Gilbert Street; and WHEREAS, this alley segment does not provide access to any property except for urban renewal parcels A-2 and A-3; and WHEREAS, the Iowa City Law Building Partnership has submitted a proposal to pur- chase Parcels A-2 and A-3 and desires to acquire this portion of the alley in order to incorporate it into their building and parking plans, and WHEREAS, it has been determined that $2,572 would be a fair market price for said parcel. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF IOWA CITY, IOWA, THAT: The City Council does hereby declare its intent to convey its interest in the above-described City -owned alley portion to Iowa City Law Building Partnership, Upon conveyance of said property, (1) the City shall retain an easement over the entire tract for the existing sewer, and (2) an easement shall be retained for public utility lines. Furthermore, Iowa City Law Building Partnership shall be responsible for all costs related to the conveyance of said property, including but not limited to abstracting, title work, attorney fees, revenue stamps, closing costs, etc. AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT: A public hearing on said proposal be set for July 14, 1987, and that the City Clerk be and is hereby authorized, empowered and directed to cause Notice of Public Hearing to be published as provided by law relative to the proposal herein- above set forth. It was moved by McDonald and seconded by Strait the Resolution be adopted, and upon roll call there were: AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: X AMBRISCO X — BAKER X COURTNEY X DICKSON __R_ MCDONALD X STRAIT — —� ZUBER Passed and approved this 30th day of June 1981, AA Y20 R ATTEST: kNN�i�uJ RMhnd i Ap"vav BY legd DapaZp��nl r .- 9os- ,d BARKER, CRUISE, KENNEDY, HOUGHTON & FOSTER Mr. Don Schmeiser Director of Planning and Program Department City of Iowa City Suite 300, Commerce.)Building Iowa City, Iowa 52740 RE: Redevelopment Parcels A-2 and A-3 Dear Don: As I mentioned on the phone today, our law firm is inter- ested in purchasing the two City owned parcels located on the west bank of lower Ralston Creek designated as redevelopment parcels A-2 and A-3. Our plans are to use the parcels for offices. I respectfully request that you take the steps necessary to advertise the property under state and federal requirements and give us the opportunity to submit a bid. We would hope to be able to acquire the property by mid July, 1987, so that we could construct an office building for occupancy by December, 1987. The time lines are important to us. We would also ask that the City agree to vacate that por- tion of the alley laying adjacent to and immediately east of parcel A-3. By doing this we would hope to acquire that part of the alley and incorporate it in our building and parking plans. To meet parking requirements, we will need that part of the alley and both parcels. We intend to develop a -high quality building and we belie -:e that our intended use of the property would be very appropriate. I would ask you to stay in contact with me about this. At your convenience, please advise me as to the next steps that o need to be taken, I do want to thank you for meeting with Jim Houghton and I. Ver -y- truly yours, ?Jn Cruise � JDC/nrl 03/7-06-87 IM LAWYERS CHARLES A BARKER ]II IOWA AVENUE- P.O. BOX 2000 JOHN O. CRUISE IOWA CITY. IOWA AREA CODE DIY MICHAEL W. KENNEDY 52244 TELEPHONE 351-Blal JAMES O. HOUGHTON DAVIS L FOSTER May 4, 1987 Mr. Don Schmeiser Director of Planning and Program Department City of Iowa City Suite 300, Commerce.)Building Iowa City, Iowa 52740 RE: Redevelopment Parcels A-2 and A-3 Dear Don: As I mentioned on the phone today, our law firm is inter- ested in purchasing the two City owned parcels located on the west bank of lower Ralston Creek designated as redevelopment parcels A-2 and A-3. Our plans are to use the parcels for offices. I respectfully request that you take the steps necessary to advertise the property under state and federal requirements and give us the opportunity to submit a bid. We would hope to be able to acquire the property by mid July, 1987, so that we could construct an office building for occupancy by December, 1987. The time lines are important to us. We would also ask that the City agree to vacate that por- tion of the alley laying adjacent to and immediately east of parcel A-3. By doing this we would hope to acquire that part of the alley and incorporate it in our building and parking plans. To meet parking requirements, we will need that part of the alley and both parcels. We intend to develop a -high quality building and we belie -:e that our intended use of the property would be very appropriate. I would ask you to stay in contact with me about this. At your convenience, please advise me as to the next steps that o need to be taken, I do want to thank you for meeting with Jim Houghton and I. Ver -y- truly yours, ?Jn Cruise � JDC/nrl 03/7-06-87 IM .1. • LQ j BEN FON ST 0 I LINA �;1P� BD. OUnOT 4, /5' LOT 33 LOT 32 LOT 3/ INTAKE / 40' 9o,s RESOLUTION NO. 87-152 RESOLUTION SETTING PUBLIC HEARING ON PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, FORM OF CONTRACT, AND ESTIMATE OF COST FOR THE RENOVATION OF CITY PARK SWIM- MING POOL, DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH NOTICE OF SAID HEAR- ING, AND DIRECTING THE DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION TO PLACE SAID PLANS, ETC., ON FILE FOR PUBLIC INSPECTION. i WHEREAS, the voters of the City of Iowa City did, at a special election held on June d , 1986, approve the issuance of general obligation bonds for the cons ruc ion of a new indoor swimming pool at Mercer Park and for the renovation of City Park Pool; and i WHEREAS, the plans, specifications, form of contract, and estimate of costs for the project to renovate City Park Pool have been prepared and submitted by Neumann Monson PC, project architects, and public hearing set thereon; and WHEREAS, the City is required by law to hold a public hearing on the plans, specifications, form of contract, and estimate of cost for the renovation of said swimming pool facilities. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF IOWA CITY, IOWA: 1. That a public hearing on the plans, specifications, form of contract, and estimate of cost for the construction of the above-named project is hereby scheduled to be held on the 14th day of July, 1987, at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers, Civic Center, Iowa City, Iowa. 2. That the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to publish notice of the public hearing on the plans, specifications, form of contract, and cost estimate for the construction of the above-named project in a news- paper published at least once weekly and having a general circulation in the city, not less than four (4) nor more than twenty (20) days before said hearing. 3. That the Director of Parks and Recreation is hereby ordered to place the plans, specifications, form of contract, and estimate of cost for the construction of the above-named project on file in the office of the City Clerk for public inspection. It was moved by McDonald and seconded by Strait the Resolution be a op an upon ro call there were: AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: X Ambrisco XBaker X Courtney X Dickson X McDonald X Strait X Zuber • Approved al Department ar/ > 90� r11 Resolution No. 87-152 Page 2 II Passed and approved this of I --30t� day Jae 1987. ATTEST: r � LLLRR I I I 1 I I I I I 904 II I r ; 904 .o• RESOLUTION NO. 87-153 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PUBLICATION OF NOTICE FOR THE RECEIPT OF SEALED BIDS FOR THE RENOVATION OF CITY PARK SWIMMING POOL, ESTABLISH- ING AMOUNT OF BID SECURITY TO ACCOMPANY EACH BID, AND FIXING TIME AND PLACE FOR RECEIPT OF BIDS. WHEREAS, the voters of the City of Iowa City did, at a special election held on June 3rd 1986, approve the issuance of general obligation bonds for the construction of a new indoor swimming pool at Mercer Park and for the renovation of City Park Pool; and WHEREAS, the plans, specifications, form of contract, and estimate of costs for the project to renovate City Park Pool have been prepared and submitted by Neumann Monson PC, project architects, and public hearing set thereon; and WHEREAS, the City is required by law to publicly advertise for sealed bids for the renovation of said facility. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF IOWA CITY, IOWA: 1. That the amount of bid security to accompany each bid for the construc- tion of the above-named project shall be in the amount of five percent (5%) of the bid price. 2. That the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to publish notice for the receipt of bids for the construction of the above-named project in a newspaper published at least once weekly and having a general circu- lation in the city not less than twenty (20) nor more than forty-five (45) days before the date established for the receipt of bids. 3. That bids for the construction of the above-named project are to be recetheived by the City of Iowa City, Iowa, at the Office of the City Clerk, Theeafter,Civithe ebids,will tibe opened by the Dion rector of day f Juland Recrea- tion or his designee, and thereupon referred to the City Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa, for action upon said bids at its next meeting to be held at the Council Chambers, Civic Center, Iowa City, Iowa, at 7:30 p.m. on the 28th day of July, 1987. It was moved by McDonald and the Resolution be a op an upon ro call there wereseconded by Strait AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: X X Ambrisco X Baker X Courtney Dickson _X X McDonald _ Strait X Zuber W -mo lI i 4 i Resolution No. 87-153 Page 2 Passed and approved this 30th day of June 1987. I I � M OR ATTEST: 90tr r RESOLUTION N0. 87-154 RESOLUTION AFFIRMING AN EMPLOYEE SUSPENSION WHEREAS, by authority of Chapter 400.19 of the Code of Iowa and after consid- eration of the facts, the City Manager has determined that certain discipli- nary action is appropriate; and WHEREAS, based on said determination, disciplinary action has been taken; and WHEREAS, the City Manager has reported to the City Council the reasons for such action by the Manager; and WHEREAS, Chapter 400.19 of the Cade of Iowa further requires the City Council to affirm or revoke such disciplinary measures taken by the City Manager. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF IOWA CITY, IOWA, that the disciplinary action taken by the City Manager with regard to the suspension of employee #80384 as indicated in the attached report to the City Council is hereby affirmed. It was moved by McDonald and seconded b the Resolution be a op , an upon ro call there were: the AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: X Ambrisco X Baker X Courtney X Dickson X McDonald X Strait X Zuber i Passed and approved this 30th day of June � 1987. MAYOR ATTEST: �1jaLLtK J 1/ CIT CLERK .1. NOTICE TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF DISCIPLINARY ACTION TAKEN BY THE CITY MANAGER NAME AND TITLE: Employee #80384, Mass Transit Operator TYPE OF DISCIPLINE: Suspension REASON FOR DISCIPLINE: Verbal Abuse On June 10, 1987, employee #80384 was involved in an incident at the downtown transit interchange at which time the employee became verbally abusive to the supervisor, using inappropriate language. Employee #80384 previously received a written warning on September 2, 1986, for similar behavior. At that time the employee was told that further in- stances of misconduct would result in more severe discipline. As a result of the incident on June 10, employee #80384 was suspended for one day. When affirmed by the Council, non -probationary employees have the right to appeal to the Civil Service Commission where a full hearing may be held. god 44 - RESOLUTION NO. 87-155 RESOLUTION MODIFYING THE URBAN RENEWAL PLAN FOR PROJECT IOWA R-14 (EIGHTH RESOLUTION). WHEREAS, hrfeCity, Iowa, a the Local tlAaeaherenafterreferedto s heLPA, has entered into a contract Ln and Grant with the United States of America for the implementation of an Urban Renewal Project known as Project No. Iowa R-14; and WHEREAS, the City of Iowa City has reached financial settlement of said Project Iowa R-14 and is continuing said project as part of the Community Development Program; and WHEREAS, the City Council of Iowa City, Iowa, has previously adopted nd mk - - approved an Urban Renewal Plan for said project by Resolution No. 2159 on October 2, 1969, and which Plan has been modified and amended thereafter; and WHEREAS, certain further modifications of said Urban Renewal Plan have been proposed and a public hearing has been held by the City Council of Iowa City, Iowa, on the desirability of said proposed modifications; and WHEREAS, the LPA deems it desirable, necessary and in the public interest that the Urban Renewal Plan be modified to amend the Proposed Land Use map by including corner oftCourt andner of Madis Maock 93 dison ets)the old withinBreee thesUniversity Areaerof land uses as defined in the Urban Renewal Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF IOWA CITY, IOWA, acting as the Local Agency that the Urban Renewal Plan for the City of Iowa City, Iowa, for Urban Renewal Project No. Iowa R-14 be modified further as follows: The Proposed Land Use map be as shown in Attachment A. It was moved by McDonald and seconded by Strait the Resolution be a op ed, an upon ro call there were: AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: X Ambrisco X Baker X Courtney X Dickson X McDonald X Strait X Zuber Passed and approved this .0th ; da of Y June 1967. ATTEST:,�j� 1 6ITY CLERK Receivod s � u �plmov;`u By Th �I=*da➢ �ef?a+Smont X23 7 .o• PROPOSED LAND USE U L - 0 city -University Project Project Number Iowa R-14 city 6F Iowa City, Iowa June 1987 ATTACHMENT A LES M CENTRAL BUSINESS EEm DISTRICT CORE UNIVERSITY AREA CENTRAL BUSINESS SERVICE AREA DEVELOPMENT AREA 0 BOUNDARY PROJECT AREA _ BOUNDARY DEVELOPMENT AREA 0 NUMBER RESTRICTED STREETSVA~ A .o1 W 1, z/ City of Iowa City MEMORANDUM Date: June 11, 1981 To: Planning and Zoning Commission From: Patt Cain, Economic Development Coordinator Re: Amendment to Iowa City's Urban Renewal Plan At its June 2 meeting the City Council set a public hearing for June 30 on a proposed Urban Renewal Plan amendment to alter the boundaries of the land use areas shown in the Plan and referred the item to P&Z for recom- mendation. A copy of the Urban Renewal Plan is included in the meeting packet for your information. The University of Iowa has requested that the City amend the plan to change the former Breese Company property at the northeast corner of Court and Madison Streets from the Central Business Service land use area to the University land use area. Descriptions of these areas are given on pages 8 and 9 of the Plan, and maps showing the existing area boundaries and the proposed modification are attached. The University of Iowa Facilities Corporation is purchasing the subject property for the University to lease and, in time, acquire through a lease/purchase arrangement. The improvements on the property are sched- uled for expansion and conversion to laboratory space for the College of Engineering. Remodeling and construction work would begin this summer. A preliminary drawing of the site plan is attached. The proposed boundary modification would make the planned use of the subject property for University purposes consistent with the Urban Renewal Plan. The subject parcel is contiguous with the existing University land use area to the west and with University -owned land to the south. bc3 .Y' r The University of Iowa Iowa City. Iowa 52242 114 inl 1�I' — I. Business 011ice G U V 111U May 26, 1987 Richard J. Bovie Assistant City Attorney City of Iowa Cit_v Civic Center Iowa City, IA 52240 Re: Breese Property — 324 S. Madison St. Dear Rich: This will confirm our conversation relative to subject property description of the property is: The South 75 feet of Lot six (6) he legal of Lot five (5), Block ninety—three (93), Iowa City, Iowa." all entered For background information, the University of Iowa Facilities Corporation into an Iowa Will lease and, Inntime. acquiret to acquires the ubjaproct pertyrfrom the Facilities of Corporation through a lease/purchase arrangementThe improvements on the property are scheduled for expansion and conversio., n to use as laboratory Space for the College of $ngineering. The remodeling and constru would be accomplished beginning this summer. ction work The University requests modification of Iowa City's Urban Renewal Plan consistent with the planned use of the subject Iowa purposes. 'property for University of j Thank you for your consideration of this and for your assistance. Cordially, , 00 Mic ael J. Finnegan j Business Manager MJF:bb cc: Dorsey.D. Ellis, Jr. Charles A. Mullen Rr, icp LEG. •rr., P c w PROPOSED LAND USE I WASHII tU11LINOTON o � ISL ••� • ' AP i■■■■■ R ■■Rett ■■■RR■ Mel■■■■ ■ ■■RR 7■RRRR■ a■■■■■ *A,"IMMO iwAwAAE sR■R■■ YYI�YiYlllWlli ••.•.• MEMONE XWOMMIN MINNOMMI i■■■■■ OMMMOM iiiiii iiiiiii , •'•YY9D � P••i •'� •4 P• � •` ••Jiiiiii/ i000•iiii•�O' �••••••O•�00� Piiiii4•i0 � � • oii•OOOPO•Q• �•O�•i ••••O•� • ••i'O•Wi'�� ••••too •••••• 1••••♦ N• `••••••• • CURRENT PLAN PROPOSED LAND USE I WASMII BURLINGTON ST. o Proposed addition to University Area City -University Project Project Humber Iowa R-14 City of Iowa City, Iowa REQUESTED MODIFICATION LHEND CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT CORE UNIVERSITY AREA CENTRAL BUSINESS SERVICE AREA DEVELOPMENT AREA .� BOUNDARY PROJECT AREA _ BOUNDARY DEVELOPMENT AREA U NUMBER RESTRICTED STREETS%%^~ I 0 .P' RESOLUTION NO. 87-156 RESOLUTION AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO PROVIDE FOR OFFICE, RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTERS IN NORTHEAST IOWA CITY. WHEREAS, the City of Iowa City adopted an update of the Comprehensive Plan February 15, 1983; and WHEREAS, the Comprehensive Plan indicates for the long-range development of the northeast quadrant of the intersection of Highway 1 and I-80 that commer- cial and office research park uses are appropriate; and WHEREAS, economic trends argue for a policy in which cities the size of Iowa City target small businesses involved in the research and manufacture of certain products for location and expansion in Iowa City; and WHEREAS, the area north of I-80 and east of Highway 1 within the Iowa City corporate limits is appropriate for this type of research and development center as well as office research park uses due to its access to I-80 and the high visibility available on the site; and WHEREAS, general commercial uses are not desirable or appropriate as the best use of this land. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF IOWA CITY: 1. to amend the Comprehensive Plan to provide a designation of Office, Research and Development Centers. 2. to designate that area north of I-80 and east of Highway 1 within the Iowa City corporate limits Office, Research and Development Centers. It was moved by McDonald and seconded by Dickson the Resolution be'a op a an upon ro call there were: AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: X Ambrisco X Baker �— Courtney X Dickson X McDonald Strait X Zuber Passed and approved this 30th day of June 1987, OR ATTEST: '�F.»'d LIT '- CLERK ..laoip�� Il:'I:atm<�nt ,P• W C RESOLUTION NO. 89_187_15_ RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF PRAIRIE VIEW ESTATES, PART 2, OF JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA. WHEREAS, the owners, A&A Coins, Inc., Thomas Wegman and Doris Marchael, have filed with the City Clerk of Iowa C the preliminary plat ity, Iowa, an application for approval of of Prairie View Estates, Part 2; and WHER Iowa ECity'sh twormpileextra extraterritorial subdivision jurisd siction;in Jandson County and within WHEREAS, the Department of Planning and Program Development and the Public Works Department have examined the proposed preliminary plat and have recom- mended approval of same; and WHEREAS, the preliminary plat has been examined by the Planning and Zoning Commission and after due deliberation the Commission has recommended that it be accepted and approved; and WHEREAS, the preliminary plat is found to conform with a hll of the requirements of the City Ordinances of the City of Iowa City, Iowa. IOWA Pertinent NOW, :THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED 8Y THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF IOWA CITY, I. That the preliminary plat of Prairie View Estates, Part 2, is hereby approved. That the or erk of 2 authorized nand directed tolcertifytthishe iresolution whicOf Iowa h shall beIowa areahereb ffixed to the plat after passage and approval by law. It was moved by Dickson ansecoed by the Resolution be adopted, and upon roll call there were: Strait AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: X �— Ambrisco X Baker X Courtney X Dickson X McDonald Strait X Zuber Passed and approved this 30th day of June 1987.�� / MA OR ATTEST: Rocelved &A},:na•i,st 8y 1110 L02 ! SSsairtatvnt , 6, 7 III .1. STAFF REPORT To: Planning & Zoning Commission Prepared by: Barry Beagle Item: S-8709. Prairie View Estates, Part Two Date: June 18, 1987 GENERAL INFORMATION Applicant: Requested action: Purpose: Location: Size: Existing land use and zoning: Surrounding land use and zoning: Fringe area: Applicable regulations: File date: 45 -day limitation period: ARA Coins, Inc. Hawkeye State Bank Building Iowa City, Iowa 52240 Phone: 338-1144 Owners: A&A Coins, Tom Wegman, and Doris Michael Preliminary plat approval. To establish a 10 -lot subdivi- sion. County: Immediately north of Interstate 80 and east of Prairie du Chien Road. 13.87 acres. Undeveloped; RS, Suburban Residential, North - Undeveloped; A-1, South - I-80; RR -1. East - Undeveloped; RS. West - Single -Family Residen- tial; RS. Area 3; residential develop- ment is encouraged. Fringe Area Policy Agreement, City Rural Design Standards and Stormwater Management Ordinance. April 16, 1987, May 29, 1987, 931 ,o• r SPECIAL INFORMATION Public utilities: Public utilities are presently not available. Individual septic/absorption field sys- tems will be used for sewage disposal. Water service will be provided by a common well distribution system. Public services: Police protection will be provided by Johnson County. Fire protection will be pro- vided by the City of Solon. Transportation: The site is accessible from Prairie du Chien Road via Kyle Drive. Physical characteristics: The site is located on a heavily vegetated upper side slope draining to the north and east at a grade of 5-14%. ANALYSIS A. Background: As the second phase of development, the applicant is seeking preliminary plat approval to resubdivide a portion of Lot 25 of ViewView rt comprisese97.13 acresewithaapprroxima eOne.lly to33heracresrairie subdivided intoEstates residential lots in December 1983. Lot 25, which represents the balance of the development, was identified for future development on the preliminary plat of Part One, and was included as a part of the subdivision since the stormvater detention basins were located in this area. The applicant seeks to resubdivide 13.87 acres of the 63.91 acres known as Lot 25, to establish ten (10) additional residential lots known as Prairie View Estates, Part Two. Individual lot sizes will range from 1.0 to 1.5 acres comparable with lots in Part One and in conformance with the RS zone of the Johnson County Zoning Ordi- nance. B. Fringe Area Policy Agreement: The subject parcel is located immedi- ately north of the Iowa City corporate limits within Area 3 m the Iowa City/Johnson County Fringe Area Policy Agreement. It is the Policy of Area 3 to encourage residential development. No annexation of any portion of this area is anticipated for the review period provided for in this agreement. Accordingly, all new subdivisions within this area shall conform with the City Rural Design Standards. C. Transportation: Access to the subdivision will be provided by the continuation of Banbury Street from Prairie View Estates, Part One. Each street is to be constructed of six (6) inches of portland con- crete One. CityfRuraliDe,signsStandardstrequireio lylaatsixst(6e)etinch rolled stone base and chipseal surface 22 feet wide. Banbury Street 93/ .Y' and Kent Court are designed as local residential streets with 60 foot rights-of-way, and Devon Drive is designed to collector street stan- dards with a 66 foot right-of-way. The applicant indicates that the north and east ends of Devon Drive will temporarily be constructed of a crushed stone surface. h the City Rural This is inconsistent wit Design Standards and should be changed to reflect a chic Ci surface at a minimum. New subdivisions should be properly integrated with the existing street system and should provide for secondary access where necessi- tated by the size and configuration of the subdivision to ensure the safe and convenient circulation of traffic and to ensure the prompt delivery of emergency services. Currently, access to Prairie View Estates is limited to the intersection of Kyle Drive with Prairie du Chien Road. With ten (10) additional lots being platted, an evaluation of secondary access should be made. The City has set a policy that approximately 27 lots is the maximum number allowed to be subdivided without having to provide secondary access. With the plat of Part Two, Prairie View Estates will consist of 34 platted lots. The 27 lot standard was established by determin- ing the maximum number of lots that could be platted under City zoning on a 900 foot cul-de-sac. This standard is usually applied in urban environments where development occurs at a greater density and is more compact. In a rural, large lot setting the potential dangers of fire spreading and the provision of public service delivery are not as agreat. Under these conditions, staff feels the subdivision of ten ccess.additionalfurthers would resubdivision ofrLot 25ithout should be iallowedcunless secondary access is established for the development. As interior lots are platted further away from primary streets (i.e. Prairie du Chien Road) the need for secondary access increases because the convenience of access for residents and the ease of providing emergency and public service delivery diminishes. The preliminary plat of Part One made provision for the extension of a collector/arterial street through the subdivision, tying in with properties to the north and east. Consideration of a major street was necessitated by the constraint of Rapid Creek to the north and the restriction of I-80 to the south. Future development patterns will most likely be oriented east -west due to these features. The street will serve as a transportation link to convey traffic in this area to Prairie du Chien Road and Highway 1 to the east. Construction of the street will probably occur in segments as development occurs between Prairie du Chien Road and Highway 1. Unless planned for, adequate right-of-way and protection of adjacent homes will not be provided. The first segment of the street, known as Devon Drive, is proposed to be constructed with this plat and closely follows the alignment ap- proved with the preliminary plat of Part One. To assure continuity, provision should be made for the future dedication of this right-of-way to the public upon final platting. Devon Drive will more than likely provide the means of secondary access as future develop- ment occurs. 93/ .P' 4 D. Utilities: Sanitation within the subdivision will continue to be provided by individual septic systems approved by the Johnson County Health Department. Nater service will be provided by a private common well system which will also need to be approved by the Health Depart- ment. The size, type and location of the distribution system should be shown on the plat. One (1) additional well is to be drilled which is located on Lot 32 within a 25'x25' easement. Stormwater detention basins for the overall development of Prairie View Estates were anticipated with the approval of Prairie View Es- tates, Part One. Additional calculations will be required to deter- mine whether the basins serving Part One and Part Two will provide adequate storage for all 34 lots. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the preliminary plat of Prairie View Estates, Part Two, be deferred but that, upon resolution of the deficiencies and dis- crepancies listed below, the plat be approved. DEFICIENCIES AND DISCREPANCIES 1. As with the approval of Prairie View Estates, Part One, there should be a note on the plat that "Syril Street will not be improved for regular vehicular access to the development until the grade and/or alignment of Prairie du Chien Road is substantially improved." 2. Indicate that no structures or absorption fields shall be located within the stormwater management easement. 3. Identify the size, type and specifications of the water distribution system proposed by the applicant. 4. Indicate that all driveway approaches within street right-of-way will be hard surfaced. 5. Show both ends of Devon Drive being improved with a chipseal surface in lieu of crushed stone. ATTACHMENTS 1. Location map. ACCOMPANIMENTS 1. Preliminary plat of Prairie View Estates, Part Two. Approved by: ��) ona c me ser�8, o�Er Department of Planning and Program Development 93/ LOCATION MAP S-8709 as a. ��• 2. fa •-P—■-. as -. oiy an fa ¢a�.— c ■ I I 1 ' ■ Prairie 3u • _en Road Subject Parcel Two Mile'Extrater-ritor,ial ■ it /i Limit u` ■ as 134 I a •I O � / I '/� — / 41r If 42 24 4 .a• � .Its"' �\` ��— �` �� 1 I '�.. I , \ \\ Ali! � '• \\ \ Fh�"�' ' --� ,o• P , RESOLUTION N0. ell APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLATS OF BOYRUM SUBDI- VISION, PART THREE, A SUBDIVISION OF IOWA CITY, JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA. with the WHEREAS, the owner and proprietor, Southgate Development Company, prelimi ary andClfinal erk oPlatsaOfiB , Iowa,um an application for approval of the P y, has filed Of Iowa City in Johnson County, Iowa, which is legally described as follows; Three, a subdivision A parcel of land in the SWI/4 SEI/41 Section 15, T.79 N. R.6 W., of the 5th P.M., Iowa City described on survey pla, Iowa, said parcel being the same realty t recorded in Plat Book 6, Page 24, Johnson County Recorder's Office, described as follows; Beginning at a 5/8" rebar on the south right-of-way line of Highland Ave, in Iowa City, which point is 771.23 feet west and 30 feet south of the NE corner of said SWI/4 SEI/4, Section 15; Thence East, 335.00 feet along said south line of Highland Aveto a 5/8" rebar marking the NW corner of Plum Grove Acres Subdivision, Part Three; Thence S 00034'20" W, 393.00 feet (recorded 393.28') along the west line of said Plum Grove Acres to a 5/8" rebar n the northerly ROW line of U.S. Highway 6; o Thence N 68017'40-'W, rebar feet (recorded 361.97') along said Highway 6 ROW to a 5/8 Thence N 01007'30" E, 259.22 feet (recorded 259.31') to the Point of Beginning; Said Boyrum Subdivision, Part Three, contains 2.52 acres. WHEREAS, the Department of Planning and Program Development and the Public Works Department have examined the preliminary and final plats of said subdi- vision and have recommended deferral of the extension of Boyrum Street; and WHEREAS, the preliminary and final plats of said subdivision have been exam - Commission ehaslarec moendedZothat Commission odenied, a finding deliberation the Boyrum Street not in the public interest and a potential detriment to neigh- boring residential properties; and 9 the extension of WHEREAS, the preliminary and final plats are found to conform with the tech- nical requirements of city ordinances of the City of Iowa City, low a, 9s02� .a• Resolution No. Page 2 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF IOWA CITY, IOWA: 1. That the preliminary and final plats of Boyrum Subdivision, Part Three, a subdivision of the City of Iowa City, are hereby approved, subject to a limitation of two access points to Lot 2 an Boyrum Street extended and maintenance of a screening fence and vegetation on the east side of Boyrum Street being the responsibility of the owners of Lot 2. 2. That the Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Iowa City, Iowa, are hereby authorized and directed to execute any legal documents relating to said subdivision and to certify the approval of this resolution, which shall be affixed to the preliminary and final plats after passage and approval by law; and the owner/subdivider shall record the legal documents and the plat at the office of the County Recorder of Johnson County, Iowa, before the issuance of any building permit is authorized. It was moved by and seconded by the Resolution be adopted, and upon roll call there were: AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: Ambrisco Baker Courtney Dickson McDonald Strait Zuber Passed and approved this day of 1986. ATTEST: CLERKCITY ""'ved 8 A'prever: BYTE mal Dep rt no 93�- .V' 29 June 1987 City Council City of Iowa City Civic Center 410 East Washington Street Iowa City, Iowa 52240 To Iowa City City Council: I wish to state my personal opinion regarding the Boyrum Street Subdivision matter to which you will be giving your attention during your meetings the 29th and 30th of June. I am the owner of the house at 1405 Plum Street. It appears that with the approval of the Boyrum Street Subdivision, Boyrum Street will be extended from Highway 6 through to Highland Avenue. This means that a potentially busy street will'be running directly behind my property. I strongly feel the construction of this road and the increased traffic to the area will alter the quiet atmosphere of the existing family neighborhood and will greatly take away from my enjoyment of the house as a residence. I further feel the value of the house and neighborhood will decrease due to the alteration of the area. Sincerely, Jim Shaw 01987 AIARIAN K. KARR CITY CLERK (3) . 93Z I .1. City of Iowa City MEMORANDUM Date: June 25, 1987 To: City Council From: Karin Franklin, Senior Plann 4 Re: Boyrum Subdivision, Part 3 The Boyrum Subdivision, part 31was submitted to the City in March, 1986. The Planning and Zoning Commission considered the application at its April and May meetings, recommending denial at its May I meeting by a vote of 2-4 on an affirmative motion. The staff report, pertinent memos, and excerpts from the Commission's informal and formal meeting minutes are enclosed for the Council's review. Petitions and letters frau the public will be provided at the Council's request; the minutes summarized the Public sentiment regarding this proposal. The subdivision entails the extension of Boyrum Street north from its existing intersection with Highway 6 to Highland Avenue. The arguments presented by the Developer in favor of the proposal are basically that the extension of the street will I. Relieve the congestion at the Highland Avenue/Gilbert Street intersec- tion, 2. Enhance the value of properties in the Highland Court Commercial area, and 3. Provide for the development of a commercial lot defined by Highway 6, Boyrum Street extended and Highland Avenue, adding to the tax base of Iowa City. The arguments presented by residents of the Plum Street/Highland Avenue/Diana Street area and members of the Planning and Zoning Commission in opposition to the subdivision are that the extension of Boyrum Street will 1. Add unwanted commercial and pass through traffic to substandard local residential streets, 2. Residences along plum Street will be adversely affected by the crea- tion of double frontage lots and the noise, lights and litter associ- ated with commercial development on the lot described above, and 3. Development of the site and the extension of the street will exacer- bate existing drainage problems on Highland Avenue. After receiving a negative response from the Planning and Zoning Commis- sion, the developer chose to defer sending the subdivision onto the City Council in 1986. On October 7 and October 21, 1986, the developer hosted 934;L z two neighborhood meetings to discuss the proposals with residents of the area. At these meetings, no firm resolution of the issues raised above was reached. The developer has requested that the at changes have been made on subdivision proposal be taken before the Council this time. As of the date of this memo, no May 1, 1986. the plat as it was voted on by the Commission Prior to formal approval of the plat by the City Council, revised legal papers must be submitted and approved by the City's legal staff. The remaining deficiencies noted in the staff report have, for the most part, been met or negotiated at the Commission level. However, since the major- ity of the Commission did not recommend approval of the subdivision, these Points should be discussed by the Council if approval of the plat appears likely. Because of the Commission's negative vote, a meeting for consul- tation thewith CouncilCommission inf r ally discusso be Staff would suggest action, if approval seems likely, until after these matters are settled. tp4/1 ii l i I 1 i I I I i P•. I I i I I 1 I_ 93 STAFF REPORT To: Planning & Zoning Commission Item: 5-8605. Boyrum Subdivision, Part 3 Preliminary & Final Plat GENERAL INFORMATION Applicant: Prepared by: Karin Franklin Date: April 3, 1986 Landmark Surveying & Engineering for owner, Southgate Development Co. 325 E. Washington Street Iowa City Requested action: I Approval of a preliminary and final subdivision Purpose: plat for two commercial lots. To develop the two lots and extend Boyrum Street Location: north to Highland Avenue. Between Highway 6 and Highland Avenue, west Size: of Plum Street and east of Gilbert Street. Existing land use and zoning: 2.52 acres Surrounding land Open storage, warehousing; CI -1. use and zoning; North - Clark'sCarpets, commer- East - single family residential; RS -5. South - Highway 6, Hy-Vee/Drug- town, commercial uses; CI -1. Comprehensive Plan: West - general commercial; CI -1. � Applicable regulations: Commercial intensive. '.o• Subdivision regulations; Storm Water Management Ordinance. 45 -day limitation period: � 60 -day limitation period: May 2, 1986 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION May 12, 1986 Public utilities: f Municipal sewer and water are available. i r i 93a Public services: Police and fire protection will be provided. Transportation: Access to the subdivided lots is from Highland Avenue and the proposed Boyrum Street exten- sion. Physical characteristics: The topography is relatively flat, sloping gently to the west. BACKGROUND The applicant has submitted a plat for the subdivision of a 2.52 acre parcel of land west of the Plum Street residential area, east of Gilbert Street, between Highway 6 and Highland Avenue. The apparent purpose of the subdivi- sion is to develop Lot 2 for a commercial use and extend Boyrum Street north to Highland Avenue; Lot 1 is already developed and the plat indicates the existing building will remain. The Commission reviewed the proposal for the extension of Boyrum Street at the March 3 meeting. At the informal session, the Commission indicated a willingness to consider the extension of Boyrum Street, with the possibility of Highland Avenue being subject to an embargo to discourage truck traffic through the residential neighborhood and with a no left turn restriction for westbound traffic accessing Gilbert Street. Concern was expressed at the meeting that traffic generated by the grocery store south of Highway 6 would go through the residential area if the extension were to happen. Of particu- lar concern was the possible use of Keokuk Court and Diana Street since these streets provide a link to Dodge Street. The Commission requested that the property owners on Diana Street, Keokuk Court and Plum Street be notified of the request (see letter attached). The Commission also requested an evalua- tion by the Traffic Engineer of the impact of a four-way intersection at Boyrum Street and Highway 6 and the effect existing and proposed traffic signals on Highway 6 would have on the speed of traffic. ANALYSIS The subdivision proposed meets the general requirements of the subdivision regulations. Specific technical deficiencies and concerns of the staff are discussed below. Since the primary purpose of the subdivision is the exten- sion of Boyrum Street, the appropriateness of this extension should be re- solved first. The Commission should review thmemo dated February 28, 1986 for the staff's position relating to the extension. Comment' maybe Commission members that X Diana Street and Keokuk CourtAmade—by- used as an alternative to Keokuk to reach the Hy -Vee store south of Highway 6 reinforce the staff's opinion that consideration of the extension of Boyrum Street should be tied into an analy- sis of the most appropriate north/south route in this area of the City. The route which may be established by the extension of Boyrum would lead from Dodge Street south to Diana Street, to Keokuk Court, to Highland Avenue, to Boyrum Street, and then to the shopping area south of Highway 6. The local roads in this area are not constructed to accommodate high volumes of traffic '13 X and are currently in a state of disrepair. Serious consideration should be given to the effect this extension will have on traffic patterns in the immediate residential area and in the north/south movement of traffic from Dodge Street to Highway 6 and south. Discussion of the issues which follow relate to the subdivision and assume that the concept of Boyrum Street extended is acceptable. Double Frontaagee Lots: The subdivision regulations state "Lots with double rontt age on rof Viand rear shall be avoided, except in specific locations where good platting indicates their use," Section 32-54(a)(9). Boyrum Subdi- vision Part 3 creates double frontage lots for those properties fronting on Plum Street with The question before rearlot oCommission lois whethnthe er theosedp atrs submitted forum Street eBoyrum Subdivision, Part 3 constitutes "good platting." Stormwater Mana ement: Compliance with the stormwater management ordinance is usua y require or a development of this size. However, detention is not required in this instance since it it possible, with existing drainage - ways, to channelize the 100 year storm to the Iowa River. It must be demon- strated, however, that the existing system has the capacity to carry run off anticipated from this development. The developer should submit calculations showing that the pipe to the west of the site, on Highway 6, has the capacity to handle 100 year storm flows. Boyrum Street Pavin Boyrum Street is shown on the plat with 28 foot wide pay ng to a b on right-of-way. Since this street may function as a major collector, funneling traffic into and out of the residential and commercial area north of Highway 6. The staff recommends that 37 foot wide paving in a 60 foot right-of-way, to allow a full three lanes for turning movements and traffic flow, be provided. Access to Lot 2: Highland Avenue and the proposed Boyrum Street extension wou pa ac rove cess to Lot 2. Access to Boyrum Street should be restricted with the subdivision to ensure that there are no more than two access points and that they are placed far enough from the intersection with Highway 6 to avoid conflicts between traffic waiting for the light at Highway 6 and traf- fic entering and leaving Lot 2. The staff recommends that one access point be at least 100 feet from the south property line of Lot 2 and that the second point be at least 50 feet north of the first and at least 20 feet south of the north property line of Lot 2. Sidewalks: Although it is not desirable to encourage pedestrian traffic to cross ghway 6, if Boyrum Street is extended, people will inevitably walk from the residential area north of Highway 6 to the Hy-Vee/Drugtown shopping P• ; area south of the highway. Sidewalks should be provided on the west side of Boyrum Street along Lot 2 to provide pedestrian access to that lot and access to the Hy -Vee. In addition, sidewalks should be constructed south of Highway 6 along the Hy-Vee/Drugtown property and assessed against the property owner; a sidewalk is shown on the amended LSNRD approved in 1981. Screening: Since with the extension of Boyrum Street traffic will be di- rected along the back lot lines of the residences on Boyrum Street and these lots will become double frontage lots, extra measures should be taken to screen the residences from the noise and dirt of the traffic to the rear. 9301 .1. 4 lot line The applicant has proposed leaving the chainlink fence which exists on the and The staff reco mends that the an ochainlink fer vitance bee ont replaced with ohe west side of soleidffence to buffer the residences from the noise as well as to screen them visually. Arbor vitae may be planted at the discretion of the applicant to soften the appearance of the fence; a permit from the City Forester will be required since the arbor vitae shown on the preliminary plat is n the public right-of-way. Since the fence and plantings will be iithe public right-of-way, an agreement committing the developer to maintenance responsi- bilities for the fence and plantings should be required. STAFF RECOMMENDATION The staff reconmends that the preliminary and final plat of Boyrum Subdivi- sion Part 3 be deferred until the full impact of the extension of Boyrum Street can be assessed and the deficiencies and discrepancies listed below are resolved. DEFICIENCIES AND DISCREPANCIES 1, Submit calculations on the capacity of the drain pipe west of the site to ensure it can handle the 100 year storm flows. 2. Show Boyrum Street as 37 feet of paving in a 60 -foot right-of-way with 8" P.C.C. 3. Access points from Lot 2 to Boyrum Street should be shown on the plat as discussed above. 4. The Subdivider's Agreement, Section 7, should be amended to delete refer- ence to rubbish and garbage collections; these municipal services are not provided to commercial properties. 5. A sidewalk on the west side of Boyrum Street between Highland Avenue and Highway 6 should be shown on the plat. 6. Any swale on the east side of Boyrum is on residential property. Elimi- nate its use and elevate street so that water will drain to street and drainage system. 7. Enclose the pipe on Highway 6. 8. Show existing curb cuts on Highland Avenue. g. Show the distances between the existing building on Lot 1 and the lot lines. 10. The Agreement should include reference to construction of a sidewalk (item M5), provision for erosion control escrow for the lots, and a commitment by the developer to bear the cost of all changes in signaliza- tion of Boyrum and Highway 6. ATTACHMENTS I. Property owner letter. 93e% .P' W I 5 i2. Memo dated February 28, 1986. iACCOMPANIMENTS Preliminary and final plat. Soyrum Street and Highway 6 intersection plan. Approved by: Dona c meiser, irec or Department of Planning and Program Development 93x- City of Iowa City MEMORANDUM - [necessary te: February 28, 1986 Planning and Zoning Commission m: Karin Franklin, Senior Planner Requested Extension of Boyrum Street thgate Development Company has requested approval of the extension of rum Street from Highway 6 north to Highland Avenue. The proposed t -of -way would traverse property currently owned by Southgate and d be dedicated to the City as a public street upon completion of con- ction. Formal Iowa Department of Transportation approval would be ssary prior to commencing construction. A subdivision of the property d be required. Prior to formal submission of the subdivision,hgate would like preliminary review of the proposal by the Commissionproperty to the west of the roned CI -1 and roperty to the east is zoned RS5o ad ised s dev1ped forht-of-way is zsingle-family ences. As stated in a letter from Ralph Staffer (attached)gate intends to provide an arbor vitae hedge between the right-of-wahe residential uses. A cursory review is presented below, evaluating this proposal in the context of the following factors: I. The impact of this extension on the functioning of Highway 6. 2. The effect the extension will have on surrounding properties. 3. Whether Boyrum Street should be extended for any public purpose. 4. Whether the extension fits in with the existing or proposed patterns in the area. street The Traffic Engineer has reviewed the proposal and finds that a four-way intersection at this signal will add to congestion on Highway 6, thus further diminishing the function of Highway 6 as an arterial. The extension x f-wa onbwould be an asset to the CI -1 property to the west of the o. Avenue, with by providing r v yng a additional access point, other than Highland east may experience a decrease my the traffic 6. The iusing alPlum pStreet as erties to the alternative to the Highland/Gilbert Street intersection, however, that traffic may merely be shifted to their back yards. An evaluation'of the impact this portion of Boyrum would have on adjacent residential proper- ties should be done in consultation with the residents of the area. 94OX The extension of Bo rum POW improvement project b not been Street has Y has received no re uesty the Cit considered as a necessary The benefit q to construct tither than this inquiry, the tion of which might be drawn from the four-wa Highland/Gi a troblem with extension Y intersection here. Street intersewestbound left -turning tould be the allevia_ intersection when the nor /south light Traffic does a traffic at the Vehicles get the at tion is queue up to the extent ght at Gilbert and this until the locked and cars turnt that the Highland/Gilbert Street i is red, vehicles fromhthehanges and g west onto Gilbert Street intersout traffic disperses. Street cannot Avenue east and Gilbert Court and Highland Court situation may get out access to Highway Plum Street or Laurel area Y cause ate alternative a d kee6. e extension of Street as to Highland area. P the co Bl trarumffic could provide a means of mnercial traffic out of the mresidential Conversely, the extension Of commercial vehicles through heBoyrum residential 9e of more direct Y encourage the passage commercial area south northbound area b more south traffic on y providing a seemingly extension would also 1i�k ighwaY 6 and destined forruKe corrin the Highwaythe two co Keokuk St eet� existinstreet area north of Highway 6erisal areas north and south The tors. Patterns now relatively tors. ioniof may be due s and the uses there are not hitraffic 1Sen aby - Bo rum Part to difficult access and law isibiitenera- probably result I use thIngdirectly connect s generatin this area to HiThe ghway 6 and The conformance of g more traffic in the area. difficult to evaluates Proposed extension Plan Update at this time, with future street Iowa Cit the staff will be lookin As part of the next patterns is and Su Y Particularly in relation g at traffic patterns Comprehensive tial and �residentiastreets jnd how the to Keokuk, Kirkwood i^ southeast direction areas southOf generated in the develoge� Governor dors to existing development. Highway 6 circulates developing as well as the Bo Those unknown future n a north/south part of the Cit The staff would' ma change land use Patterns corri- on.the Boyrum extension until thisuld sugg st that Patterer in (research on this part of more comprehensivegoment be reserved the next fiscal the Comprehensive analysis is year). Plan should be carried out in Approved by D Schmeiser, Directo Pt. Of Planning & Program bdwl/2 Of t Accompaniment I. Plan .o• I� I 9J= .P' City of Iowa City MEMORANDUM - Date: March 28, 1986 To: Karin Franklin, Senior Planner From: James Brachtel, Traffic Engineer Re: Request for Extension of Boyrum Street The Planning and Zoning Commission has requested a comment regarding the proposed extension of Boyrum Street at U.S. Highway 6. The developer has not indicated any Potential clients for Lot 2 of the proposed development, however, current zoning would permit a high traffic generator to occupy the site. Any land use such as a fast food store, gas station or convenience store could be located at this site. While the traffic generating characteristics differ somewhat, they do generate relatively large amounts of traffic. In addition to the traffic generated by the development, traffic increases can be attributed to drivers seeking alternates to the City's arterial street system. This traffic will attempt to avoid congestion on the arterial system and diffuse itself through the adjacent commercial and residential street network. The operation of the intersection of Boyrum Street and U.S. Highway 6 will be degraded. The addition of the fourth leg will require a large proportion of time to be provided for the "side street" with a corresponding proportionate reduction in time for U.S. Highway 6. The addition side street time required will be due to two factors. The first is the increase in traffic entering the intersection. This will be a combination of traffic generated by the development on Lot 2 and by traffic attempting to avoid congestion at other points in the arterial system. The second factor will be the nature of traffic entering from the north. A high percentage of traffic from the north will be executing turning movements - right or left. Relatively few trip end destinations lie south of the intersection. Therefore, many vehicles will turn and move along U.S. Highway 6. Turning move- ments take longer to complete when compared to straight through movements. This is particularly true when opposing traffic is also attempting to turn. Both parties must complete their path through the intersection with an understanding of the intention of the other party. This communication requires time. Movement along U.S. Highway 6 will also be degraded. This will be attributable to two factors. The first factor is the addition of traffic to U.S. Highway 6 gener- ated by the development of Lot 2. The amount of traffic added cannot be deter- mined with certainty as the name of the potential client is unknown. However, additional traffic will be generated. The second factor for degrading the operation of U.S. Highway 6 will be a reduc- tion in time given to traffic on U.S. Highway 6 at the intersection. A smaller share of signal time will be devoted to the traffic on U.S. Highway 6. Should you require additional comment or have additional questions, please don't hesitate to contact me. bj5/3 I I MINUTES FOf14AL MEETING PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APRIL 3, 1986 - 7:30 P.M. l PAGE 6 SUBDIVISION ITEMS: /1. S-8605. Public discussion of an application submitted by Southgate Development Company for approval of a preliminary and final subdivision plat for Boyrum Subdivision, Part 3, a 2.52 acre tract between Highland Avenue and Highway 6, east of Gilbert Street; 45 -day limitation period: 5/2/86, 60 -day limitation period: 5/12/86. Franklin mentioned this item had been discussed when brought before the Commission informally. The Commission indicated a willingness to entertain a formal application. In that discussion, concern was expressed regarding traffic flow. Staff at that time recommended deferral of the application until traffic issues in the area could be examined. In the update of the Comprehensive Plan, the north -south pattern will be examined. For discussion, Franklin stated she would address the specific points in the subdivision assuming the extension is acceptable. A point of concern is the double frontage of lots along Plum Street. The ordinance states that double frontage lots should be avoided. The Commission must consider if the subdivision would be good platting and justify double frontage lots. Another point Franklin addressed I in- volved to retain the exi sting wscreened.ingchain l ink fenceanTh add shrubbery. The staff suggested a solid fence. Another point of consideration addresses stormwater management. The Engineering Department feels there is a need for enclosed drainage along Highway 6. Because of the size of the area, a stormwater management system is required, although the water need not necessarily be retained on the premises. It is cur- rently under discussion whether the owners of Lot 1 or 2 could main- tain a a swale on -the east side ofwale Boyrum.ongThe h ev loper6. There is and thecEngineeringsDepartment have discussed the possibility that the street be lowered so the drainage I would flow over the road into a pipe system. Ralph Stoffer 325 E. Washin on Iowa Cit ,representing the developer, c ori a that t e eve oper an tie ngineering Department mutually agreed this plan would work. i Staff is also recommending 37 feet of pavement rather than 28 feet ° ntisted eer allows turning Franklin meoned there was also concern among staff with access to Lot 2. Staff suggested access to this lot be limited to two points. Concern was also expressed regarding the provision the west side of Boyrum. Although the Citydoessidewalk not want to encourage pedestrian traffic to cross Highway 6, a sidewalk may be necessary. This issue requires further discussion. i 9.9 a&— .Y' MINUTES FORMAL MEETING PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APRIL 3, 1986 - 7:30 P.M. PAGE 7 Franklin continued, pointing out the factors raised at the previous informal meeting during which the extension was discussed. - Impact of extension on the function of Highway 6. This would change the timing of the signal lights, as well as slow down the speed of traffic and add to congestion at the intersec- tion. - Impact on surrounding properties. Traffic would enter along the boundary of the residential area on Plum Street and terminate at Highland Avenue. An evaluation is necessary of where the traffic would go from there in terms of a north -south flow: - Highland -Keokuk -Kirkwood - Highland -Gilbert Court -Kirkwood - Highland -Keokuk Court -Diana -Dodge Land uses could also change as a result of the extension. With the connection between Highway 6 and Highland Avenue, the value of the commercial property along Boyrum, and Highland may increase because of increased accessibility and visibility, resulting in changes in land use to higher traffic generators. - Public purpose. The extension of Boyrum could alleviate the traffic congestion at Highland and Gilbert. Truck traffic in the area has a difficult time reaching Highway 6. With the extension, this truck traffic could access Highway 6 by an alternative route. Wallace questioned where the access points on Lot 2 would be located. Franklin stated this issue was under discussion; one proposal was a point approximately 100' north of the south property line and one point 20' south of the north property line. Franklin mentioned the developer would want to discuss the provision of a sidewalk and the necessity of 37' of pavement. Dierks asked if concern expressed in a letter of opposition regarding further subdivision was valid. Franklin felt further subdivision was possible but not foreseen at this time. Scott felt there were enough questions that the Commission would want to defer voting on this application tonight. The Commission members agreed. 9tos .o• MINUTES FORMAL MEETING PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APRIL 3, 1986 - 7:30 P,M, _y PAGE 8 j Publit�pist : I RosemarY Soauldling 1407 Plum the staf reco-en e , Iowa Cit Ms. Spaulding Franklin clarified a "noOlefttturnrnhafr m Bosum onto Hi hlandeA if section of Highland and Gilbert. Highland Ave, expressing her concerns with Spaulding suggested at the letter additional traffic in the the safet g distributed a letter area the fetyor °f children in the area, Ing with da costs to the taxpayers. She read aloud her leiie ets in the 9 request to deny the extension of Boyrum Street to Highland Avenue. conclud- Scott interjected that Southgate Development would j of the extension. Franklin Paving width. Pointed out that Southgate proposed afull o2ge Paving should be provided recommended 37' to serve Y the Cit °f Pavement. The overwidth traffic flow generated if the reason for the street is Franklin added that the the the I resolved. issue of community at large, Pavement width had not been Scott mentioned that initial discussions of the Commission assumed no cost to the Cit ie it automatic If the City would require the over -width the Ove that the City pay for it? Franklin stated Pavement rwidth paving was necessar posed, the cost of the overwidth ecause be of the development pro - Scott asked the public in attendance to explaincwhether htr ck developer ar traffic was using the Hi } felt the traffic 9hland to Plum to Keokuk route. to predominately consist of Those present Wallace asked if the timingcars. noise in the area. i of the light at Boyrum could increase the j neighborhood would Increase the felt the additional traffic throw ( tion of the Highway 6 Bypass. noise, as well as diminish thegh the t Ypass. func- tion Cranston 1409 Plum the extension his come wso ouIowa Cit Cranston pointed out that with the propert ave right -Of -way on l could not handle H. trast stressed that Keokuk Court an three ides of , particularly truck traffic. Street 4 Wallace asked him to define the type of truck traffic he referred to. d Cranston felt it was mostly semi -trucks. ? Cranston also expressed concern i i stated the drainage issues raisedw erosion in the area. Franklin swage north of Hi hwa 6 would effect an existing drainage area. 9 Y in the right-of-way and not the residential Rich Nelson 1205 Diana Street With the increase of Iowa Cit Nelson expressed concern the stop signs on Of Kirkwood ic on Diana. their Placement raised the stop sign on Diana and Kirkwood. Problem of Placement relative to the � He was also concerned for the chil- 1 i 9,1a MINUTES FORMAL MEETING PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APRIL 3, 1986 - 7:30 P.M. PAGE 9 dren in the area, and the flooding on Highland, feeling that the Boyrum extension would compound this. Nelson felt that the only public benefit from the proposed subdivision would be to Southgate Development. In addressing the storm water management concerns, Franklin explained Boyrum and from Highway 6 north to two catch basins. the drainage could flow from Highland south to two catch basins on that the neighborhood could see improvements to the floShe indicated oding problem on Highland if the drainage improvements were done in conjunction with the proposed subdivision. Nelson asked who would bear these costs. Franklin stated the developer would absorb them. Diane Nelson, 1205 Diana Street, Iowa City. 0. Nelson asked the Com- mission i e i y owne a —sima-7--road near the intersection of Highland Court and Gilbert Court, feeling this could possibly be developed to Highway 6 rather than Boyrum Street. It was pointed out that this was private property. Julie Hausman, 1038 Diana Street, Iowa Cit Hausman spoke in opposi- ion o e ex ension, sta ing a stree was not necessary for devel- oment of thattraffic through the presidentiale neighborhood, on would treetstwhich increasedwhichnot physically handle the additional traffic. Hausman mentioned she would like to see the City consider other alternatives such as making the Highland -Gilbert intersection a 5 -way signal light. Hausman read a statement to the Commission, in opposition, from William Sevfarth 1017 Diana, Iowa City. Scott suggested those concerned with the signage at the Diana/Kirkwood and Dodge/Kirkwood intersections express those concerns to the City Council. Pat Gil in, 710 Diana Court, Iowa Cit . Gilpin reiterated the concern wi a swa a an oo ing on—Tighland. Another concern invovled screening. He felt the arbor vitae hedge was ineffective until matur- ity 10 years into the future. He asked the width of Boyrum on the south side of Highway 6. Stoffer responded the width to be 481. Gilpin wondered how 48' could go into 28'. In the 1983 Comprehensive Plan, Gilpin mentioned that a buffer zone f providing screening between the CI properties west of the proposal and the residential properties to the east would be required. o Gilpin explained that he lived east of Diana Street on Diana Court. Gilpin stated that when he left his home going west on Diana Court to Diana Street, access to Diana Street is difficult with traffic coming down Diana Street swerving away from parked cars on the west side of Diana Street into the northbound lane. 9meSL .o• 0 MINUTES FORMAL MEETING PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APRIL 3, 1986 - 7:30 P.M. PAGE 10 Scott questioned the buffer zone requirement in the Comprehensive Plan. Franklin explained there was a general statement in the 1978 Comprehensive Plan. She added there are no specific sites. In the zoning ordinance there is a requirement for screening between residen- tial and commercial areas. Scott asked if Gilpin had noticed an increase in traffic through Diana Street from Highland -north and Kirkwood -south. Gilpin affirmed there to be an increase in traffic. Scott questioned why. Gilpin attrib- uted this increase to the disrepair of the railroad crossing at Gil- bert Court and Kirkwood Avenue. The traffic involves much truck traffic, Gilpin confirmed, from Highland Court businesses. Dierks asked Gilpin if putting Boyrum through to Highland would exac- erbate the problem of traffic on Diana Street. Gilpin said yes, sug- gesting the extension would make it easier to go north with access to Dodge, Governor and Summit. Wallace questioned the 3 -way stop at Dodge and Kirkwood. Gilpin called the signage both a blessing and a curse. The stop signs did slow traffic on Kirkwood, but have made access to and from Diana Street difficult. Wallace asked what alternative route Gilpin would use. He felt Highland would be closest. John Shepherd 2044 Tan lewood, Iowa City. Speaking for his mother wi—fo resides at eokuc, ep erTi�i ddeeTE—there would be no benefit to the area in the extension of Boyrum. He claimed property values for those close to Boyrum would lessen. He asked if the developer would compensate these people. Todd Shepherd, Route 1, Riverside. Brother to John Shepherd, T. Shepherd also express a cod— ncerns for his mother residing at 606 Keokuk. In particular he felt the placement of Boyrum behind Plum Street was not good for the neighbors. The buffer zone should not be trees or shrubs, but should be space. Helen Schneider, 610 Keokuk Court Iowa City. Schneider feared the extension of Boyrum mgt eventua y run through to Kirkwood. She stressed her opposition to the extension. John Eckermann 1401 Plum Street Iowa Cit If Boyrum would be extended to H gh and, Ec ermann pointe out his lot would be bordered on three sides by streets. He asked the Commission to keep in mind that people in the area are private home owners, who are long term residents. He asked why anyone would be allowed to infringe on the residents' peace and quiet, lower their property values, and dimish their life savings. 930L MINUTES FORMAL MEETING PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APRIL 3, 1986 - 7:30 P.M. PAGE 11 Horowitz asked if Eckermann considered this a self -generating neigh- borhood. Eckermann explained most people are older, long-term resi- dents, who plan on passing their home onto their children. He added there also are many younger families just starting out. Scott She herd, 601 Keokuk Court, Iowa Cit . Shepherd told the Com- mtsston a as the to a netg or o0 or 25 years, and notes for the record his opposition to the proposed extension. He stated his doubt that the swales would alleviate any drainage problems, feeling that even with two catch basins, water will still drain down Highland to Kathie's Candles and into the creek. Having lived next to a com- mercial area with no buffer, Shepherd mentioned the problems which occur itoject pollution. , trestaurant econsideration for thspris allowedthepollutionproblem would worsen. Ralph Stoffer. as engineer for the plat, remarked the main concern appears to be the traffic issue. He suggested an embargo east on Highland .to cut down on the truck traffic into residential neighbor- hoods. Stoffer informed the Commission that Southgate Development had conducted a market study of the neighborhood, realizing that people not opposed or indifferent to the project would not likely attend the public meeting. Horowitz asked if the developer had considered the possibility of a 5 -way signal light at the intersection of Gilbert and Highland. Stoffer had mentioned the possibility to Jim Brachtel, Traffic Engi- neer for the City. Stoffer felt this could make a very awkward inter- section. Horowitz asked that Stoffer consider the possibility and further requested Brachtel to attend the next meeting. Stoffer cau- tioned that sometimes the solutions are worse than the problem. Mike Paul a 227 Melrose Court Iowa Cit As president of Integrated arketing, u dtstri uted to t e Commission copies of the results of the survey of residents living near the Boyrum Street proposed project area. In answer to five basic, open ended questions, those surveyed expressed general overall approval. Although the project may be an intrusion, the people in attendance represent the concerns. Wallace questioned Paul if people asked what would be established on the site when the survey was conducted. Paul clarified his office was retained by Southgate to do the survey, and documentation of the responses were limited to those stated in the report. Cranston interjected that he felt strung along by the interview ques- tions, adding that he would use the street if it were installed, but he does not want it there. Hausman, although not a respondent to the survey, agreed that it was misleading to ask if the street were there would it be utilized by local traffic. 93.1 MINUTES FORMAL MEETING PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APRIL 3, 1986 - 7:30 P.M. PAGE 12 Scott Shepherd, a respondent to the survey, conceded that his answers probably did sound positive, but he feels negatively now. Scott, in response to a general question from the public, affirmed that the public is welcome to the informal meeting of April 14, 1986, but stressed that he severely limits public discussion at the informal work sessions. For the public record, Franklin noted that letters in opposition were received from Elaine She herd, 606 Keokuk Court Iowa Cit , and Paul Duff 613 Keokuk Court, owa Cit , receive rom a ma ompson A to ephone call in favor was Plum Stro + r Franklin also received a telephone call from die Salm, 1431 Plum Street Iowa City, saying he was not particularly opposed to tl.e extnn�,� Horowitz moved to defer this application submitted by Southgate Devel- opment Company until the April 17, 1986 formal meeting. Wallace i seconded -the motion. The motion carried unanimously, 6-0. After a five minute break, the Commission reconvened at 10:35 PM. ZONING ITEMS (Continued) 5. CZ -8604. Public discussion of an application submitted by John Oaks for the rezoning of 38.5 acres in the County, near Rapid Creek Road and Highway 1, from Al to RS. Franklin explained the site is included in Area 4 of the Fringe Area Policy Agreement, which, at the Commission's last meeting, was recom- mended to be changed. Franklin added that the request is inconsistent with the existing and the proposed Area 4 policy recommendation. Staff recommends the Commission find the proposed rezoning from Al to RS inconsistent with both policies. PublicDiscussion: John Oaks Box 222 RR 2 Iowa CiOaks felt the rezoning request was cons s en witha res o et . area. He cited a development just across the road which was rezoned in late 1985. Oaks explained he has been holding off on developing this portion of his property to ascer- tain if there would be demand. Now he wants to finish what he started. He pointed out that it would be developed at less than the .o• maximum density permitted because of the topography. In regard to the development currently in place, Oaks related that he has received very Positive comments. He clarified that the property is adjacent to the ? Iowa City city limits. Scott indicated to the applicant that the request is inconsistent with the policy statements in their present form as well as in the proposed Polission must review theicy as application ein the context ofathese stated pod. e further stted at the li i s. The appli- i .V' 1 MINUTES INFORMAL MEETING PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION APRIL 14, 1986 PAGE 4 Fredin_ a B_ r2nson, also speaking for the Crisis Center % 30,�entioned that parking was possible at Mercy Hospital if the e4 was measured from the edge of the property to the Mercy lot. / SUBDIVISION ITEMS: V I. S-8605. Discussion of an application submitted by Southgate Development Company for approval of a preliminary and final subdivision plat of Boyrum Subdivision, Part 3, a 2.52 acre tract between Highland Avenue and Highway 6, east of Gilbert Street; 45 -day limitation period: 5/2/85, 60 -day limitation period: 5/12/86. Scott introduced Jim Brachtel%, available to answer questions the Commission may have regarding traffic issues for this area. Franklin pointed out Horowitz' diagram of Highway 6 included in the staff report. Dierks noted that Hudson should be inserted between Orchard and Miller. Scott suggested the Commission first discuss the extension of Boyrum. He added the impact this extension could have on Highway 6 is a separate issue, requiring a separate motion. Franklin mentioned the Commission had earlier expressed concern regarding the effect of the extension on the neighbors. The Commission had listened to statements from the neighbors on existing problems which the extension could worsen. Brachteld presented traffic counts from Diana Street between Keokuk gourt and Diana Court. The counts, taken on Tuesday, Wednesday, and Thursday were not unusual in comparison to other residential streets. In reference to the intersection of Gilbert -Highway 6 - Highland Avenue, and the use of a different light mechanism, Brachtel,Y felt that whatever system is selected it should reflect the current traffic conditions. The intent of the signage should also be apparent to the user in order for the system to work. He explained through illustration to the Commission the relation between percentages of traffic north - south -east -westbound, and percentages of time allotted to V49A. MINUTES INFORMAL MEETING PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION APRIL 14, 1986 PAGE 5 each. Brachtel/Zstressed the system involves flow Of at Highland and Gilbert could allow of traffic, trade-offs, cars in the Be added his department will a smoother Highway 6, spring to review the patterns for the counting area along In response to Horowitz' questions, "why would Byrum", Brachtell outlined the followin Commission should I vote for question: 4 points the - how does Highway 6 function? what are the north -south traffic patterns in that I area? - what is the Commission's vi C1ty, 10-20 years sion for that part of Iowa in the future, - would Boyrum be able to act (Comprehensive Plan)? Regarding as a north -south arterial? Re the g the traffic count sh Ad"'iq diz."I counts. north-beundhacounts v?ere°higher Oti ethan nthe ed Bscuthb u an suggested a definitive explanation destinationsphantor,: survey could be but done, guessing Scott wondered if a weight embargo limit commercial truck g on Hi �zCP i residential traffic going/*4hland Street might was the OnlyReighberhoods. Brachtento the surrounding i! asked if "Nfair Thru Traffic" had of felt Kirkwood this procedure, Avenue felt there was signs were Scott Melrose no fair measure of this effective. Brachtel}i Court experiment has not been very that the If the street were to be ex y successful, 1 on the limitation of tended, Scott the subdivision, access points to the questioned BrachteLl dependent o Brachtell' felt these northern half of n the land use and the orientation ofnts uthe be For a left turn lane on to Highway 6, he stated a 1 storage would be necessar use, Y (approximately 200 feet) car Horowitz requested BrachteV to stud volume of /High ay 6 and Hollywood/Highwa 6 y the intersections of Highway turning there a is understand the southbound traffic ofum as well as at Boyrum and extended, Horowitz felt the 1 of Highway 6, increase, causing more problem south I 1 9,3.. ,P' 1 MINUTES INFORMAL MEETING PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION APRIL 14, 1986 PAGE 6 Dierks asked if people were exiting the Hy Vee/Drug Town area on the south side? Brachtell believed that was the original intention of the developers to have that circular traffic flow pattern. Scott asked that the Developer respond to the following proposals: - double the "greenbelt" spaceAfrom 10 feet to 20 feet, - alternative screening (rather than chain link fence and arbor vita hedge), - 37 foot pavement for street with a 60 foot right of way, at the Developer's expense, - improvements to the drainage problem, at the Developer's expense, - completion of a four-way signage (intersection of Boyrum and Highway 6) at developer's expense, - accept limitations on access points to the north half of the subdivision, to allow a left turning lane with 10 vehicle storage, Speaking for the developer, Ralph Stouffer felt the doubled "greenbelt" would hurt the development, leaving a marginal depth of lot. He also felt an alternative screen, a solid screen, is a substantial expense item. Stouffer continued that the -28 foot pavement i,45felt to be sufficient, and they are will%*to absorb that cost as well as the signalization. He has worked on hypothetical building layouts, using a north access with south exits and a right turn only onto Highway 6. In regard to drainage, Stouffer proposed the area to be maintained like any parking area, at their expense. If .the Commission would not allow access points on the first 100 feet of the Boyrum extension north, Stouffer felt traffic in h partofaBoyrum,3lintersectinged. withScott Highlanddered wouldlalsoenorth require a left turning lane. Scott raised the issue of drainage. Stouffer mentioned a 1 l solution (although prohibitive in cost) would be the J installation of a 100 year pipe. Scott felt the area would ) 933 .o• 1 MINUTES INFORMAL MEETING PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION APRIL 14, 1986 PAGE 7 benefit more from a closed system since the swail does backup and hold water. Franklin interjected the reason for enclosure related to maintenance, With more water through there, the increase could create a0i ch. Stouffer stressed that four issues were not exclusive: screening, greenbelt, width of street, and aSFess to south of subdivision from Boyrum. 47ith imposition o�cial requests, very littlejul uld remain to develop. Franklin suggested that within the existing right of way of 10 feet on ea�E�� side, of shifting the road to west of the right of way"iin`e, eliminating the sidewalk, which would leave an extra 20 feet, using the 28 foot pavement. Scott wondered if this would still allow a turning lane at each intersection. Franklin felt it was possible. Scott suggested the developer look at the issues of alternative screening and a wider green space and go back to the drawing board. If the Commission were to vote at the formal meeting on Thursday, the application would be denied. The vote would be deferred until the May 1 formal meeting In all fairness, if the Commission has stroto feeling not to, ed extend Boyrum Street at all Franklin urged express to the developer. g n P Mlau Horowitz wondered if the subdivision could proceed w��ithout subdivide seven withoutlthexextension4�w" e1�pFp- v,% 14o defer theeapplication. Perry feltethis wasud'eeppendendtotonowhat the developer could accomplish. Stouffer felt they could meet the demands of the Commission. The Commission agreed to look at a new proposal. ZONING ITEMS (Continued) 3. Discussion of an amendment to the Sign Regulations, Section 36-62 to prohibit the use of illuminated awnings. In item 4 under "Prohibited Signs" , 1 signs which cover not more than 258 J awning may be nterna i i., ; , ,..-: _ _ _ e inserted "awning 9.0a 1 Planning & Zoning Commission April 17, 1986 Page 6 Wallace moved to defer this item until the May 15, 1986, formal meeting. Perry seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously, 7-0, SUBDIVIITEMS- ,/I EMS: ,/1. S-8605. Public discussion of an application submitted by Southgate Development Company for approval of a preliminary and final subdivision plat of Boyrum Subdivision, Part 3, a 2.52 acre tract between Highland Avenue and Highway 6, east of Gilbert Street; 45 -day limitation period: 5/2/86, 60 -day limitation period: 5/12/86. Franklin stated that staff had nothing more to add to the issues made ofpresented at the develorevious ermeetings. At the last meeting, requests were these. p Franklin asked the Chairperson to review Scott reiterated the following requests: I - the expansion of the greenbelt, east of the proposed street and west i of the residential property, and an alternative to the ; fencing and arbor screening. chain link I - over width pavement of 37 feet with a left turning lane at each end, and a 65 foot right-of-way. j - drainage improvements to be at developer's cost. - traffic signals at developer's cost. - limiting access points to the north half of the property. Scott added that the developer would take this under advisement prepare a new proposal. and Public Discussion: Greg Cranston, 1409 Plum Street, Iowa City. Cranston represented a group of neighbors in opposition to the proposed extension of Boyrum Street to Highland Avenue. He presented a petition signed by 167 People most of which were residents in the area. They tried to con- tact every home called on by the survey conducted by Integrated Mar- keting, Inc. for Southgate Development. Cranston announced that over 95% signed against the proposed extension. Concerns included ,o• Diana aand Keokuk which wouldsed traffic in the rprohibit parking of children, the narrowness of Cranston presented and read to the Comnission a letter in opposition from Elaine _ Shepherd, 606 Keokuk Court, Iowa City. ' Cranston then enumerated issues which the public present were specif- ically concerned with: I I .Y' Planning & Zoning Commission April 17, 1986 Page 7 feeling Highwayhintersection 6 werequitesimilar, Cranston nnotedgthe n mberdof Keokuk accidents at the latter intersection. - pedestrian traffic will still try to cross Highway 6 even though it would be discouraged. barricading Highland Avenueis not wanted in the neighborhood, particularly since it hasn't been opened long. concern was expressed that the street could be extended to Kirkwood sometime in the future. - property values in the whole neighborhood would decline. Howoritz asked Cranston how long he had been a resident of the neighbor- hood. Cranston responded he has been there a year. Horowitz, addressing the audience, asked the longest resident if Boyrum south of Highway 6 was Present when they purchased their home. A member of the audience stated Boyrum was not constructed and further that they were told the area would be nice commercial. Wallace asked those present if they were aware, when they purchased their homes, of the commercial property to the west. Cranston, and others, replied they did understand this. Wallace confirmed that they were aware that the area could be developed. Cranston and others indicated they were aware of this. Wallace felt they need to keep their view in perspective. CommissionCranston asked the proposal could stand andbe r cognized fif those ors reent the �n opposition of the proximately 16 people of the audience stood, Public record. Ap_ Wallace requested a ball park figure of the number of children in the neighborhood. Dianne Nelson, 1205 Diana Street, Iowa City. Although there are not children oneDiana fromon ' Kirkwood telson iouKeokukured here Court be approximately in regard 23 to closing Highland Avenue, Nelson clarified the suggestion PPcame mfrom Jim Brachtel, and did not seem to be under serious consideration. Scott affirmed the Commission was not seriously entertaining that Possibil- ity, Coo er confirmed thepcommercial zoningse who and thatoithcould be developed. in area were aware of Richard Nelson, 1205 Diana Street, Iowa City, Nelson agreed the pPpo c s aware of the commercial property, but the neighborhood he opposed to Is the street. 9U%a Planning & Zoning Commission April 17, 1986 Page 8 i 1 John Eckerman, 1401 Plum Properties could end Street, Iowa I Property, Havin uP with streets City, Eckerman noted Comm{ss{on {t was lived in the area for abutting three that some j the private a nice famil seven sides of their homeowners the area. Years, Eckerman told the invested their life 7° neighborhood Swed what would happen savings in their property, who, like himself, have Dean Thornberr , nounce 124 Worth First Avenue Sion, a in in acquiring the Iowa Cit Although he could develo Property currentl Thornberry discus - wouldn't get the volume of elop the Y under discus - which would include neededel without the extension he ment. With the a Quikirip, car wash and This would chane ' lans it would be naturalffic signal and Bo rum a fast food a tablish- would be to extend y Street all ready {n Diana an increase the street. Thornberr Place, or Plu in traffic but felt it would Y admitted several streets o Highway 6 west of Riverside not continue there of Highwa 90Ing off into come fRiv Drive, Thornberryon to Y 6 only at Gilbert and Keokukcis areas. Havin cited Wallace a long stretch.g a street off asked if Thornberry said he hadn't and stressehas spoken to area that he planned on he is Willing residents. Thornberry img• As the owner spending between EP59opo and with them. He added mission and of the downtown $ 30,000 on pick u Public that Burger Kinhe landscap- as the litter in the Is are sent out aftermeclosin9d the C0to store breakfast place Continuin late night place opening at around Thornberry visualized the I If there was no and would Probably 6:30• It would as 8:00. traffic in the evening, before 10:30 or 11not p. a 9. he would close even a00early I R.K. Smothers orn err + 614 Keokuk Court, Iowa Cit 1 6• Smothersafejtsuming the traffic would onlSmothers a significant interjected that residential area. Portion Y be coming from problem on Smothers also °f traff{c would come fromhthe ing in his Higdhland, adding that he has expressed d 6-8 conceincheso of Waterrstand- Scott assured Smothers that en age problem to find s that lgineering staff would examine concerned with the drainage work.able, system, adding that the drain- age o Wallace he was also very l formal moved to defer subdivision unanimous eating• Cooper seconded the S-8605 until the May J Y. 7-o, motion. Y 1. 1986, ' Scott announced The motion carried, be April 28 the work session to accompany the formal severely ' 1986' He stressed that at the work sessions public discussion meeting would 2• S-8606. although all public {S welcome, is limited Public discussion of an application submitted b for approval of a preliminary and final Kitty Lee Subdivision, y R H• Davis the Iowa 2.66 acres in Johnson dCount n plat for City corporate limits, west of Freeway ' 2i8uthof and Pita 1 .o• E� MINUTES INFORMAL MEETING /PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MONDAY, APRIL 28, 1986 - 7:30 P.M. SENIOR CENTER CLASS ROOM MEMBERS PRESENT: Cooper, Dierks, Horowitz, Jordan, Perry, Scott, Wallace MEMBERS ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Beagle, Boyle, Franklin, Manning CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Scott called the meeting to order at 7:35 p.m. VACATION ITEM• 1. y-8601. Public discussion of an application submitted by the Seventh Day Adventist Church requesting the vacation of Teeters Court between Rider Street and the CRANDIC rail line. Franklin expla�,i,�nned the Seventh Day Adventist Church is wanting to pa 1 he parking south of the church building, and found it to be a City street. The right-of-way is used by the resident to the east. Staff feels there is no reason to retain the right-of-way. The property owner to the east, Dr. Price, has no objections. Staff recommends the vacation. Perry asked staff if the property is then given to the church or sold. In brief, rppklin explained the property is split in half and graateo djacent property owners at given value. The Iowa Code does make allowances for property that is a liability. In this case the church would obtain the right-of-way and grant an easement to the adjacent property owner. There was a consensus to vote on this item at the formal meeting of May 1, 1986. SUBDIVISION ITEMS: 1. 5-8605. Discussion of an application submitted by Southgate Development Company for approval of a preliminary and final subdivision plat of Boyrum Subdivision, Part 3, a.2.52 acre tract between Highland Avenue and Highway 6, east of Gilbert Street; 45 -day limitation period: 5/2/86, 60 -day limitation period: 5/12/86. 960 SL .V' Planning & Zoning Commission April 28, 1986 Page 2 (i At the last meetin developer: g, several requests were made of the - move paving oft ^•• space i '� to west (201) to provide open find an alternative to the proposed Chain n link /arbor - provide 37' pavement developer's cost with a 60' right-of-way, at enclose the proposed drainage at the developer's cost 4 -way signalization at develo restrict per's cost the turningclaneponnts to lot 2, allowing a 10 car hold in to Highway 6. Ralph Stoffer, representin he the developer, distributed the revised plat, explainin reshad olved several of thegrequestsmet with Jim BrachtelJY and I = Paving: 3 lanes with a 2 Portionnarrowing to 8,car stacking for the south Screening: developer is su Screening: ng - Signal: developer had always a privacy wall. ed Access limitation: developer isamirequest to limit access points cable the south portion. to lot 2, did request an exit only in donethisrissuewas unable to meet with City Engineering Several Commission members felt drivers would attempt ,to use the e- only to enter the curb cuts could be orientedstoddeter t Franklin felt the orientation of the structure ande ar this, as well as, the parking. Stoffer distributed an illustration of the proposed wall, to be constructed of wood, and standing 7' 1i Dierks questioned who would Privacy 4 assured the developer would ass umein the wall. 6 in height. Stoffer Scott questioned the developer maintenance costs, 9 Commission to vote on this a if it were necessary for the Thursday night. Stoffer feltpthe adeveloper tion at ccould mwait eifing necessary, e p Perry asked if the additional j deleted from the plan. Stofferrexplaeen ined the lot narrow, the additional space would not make asace eeffective4. screen and noise dampener as the is already privacy wall, .o1 Planning s Zoning Commission 1 April 28, 1986 Page 3 Horowitz opted for both wood screening in addition to the vegetation. She wondered if the wood screening would cause a backup in flood waters. Stoffer explained the fence would be wasrnotmenoughoforldebrisfand waterground- to�low through. Sthis offer admitted there may have to be 1' by 1'^cut outs. Wallace rethe paemen. turned morenue Of problemsvwithttheScott internal traffic in the subdivision. If the sound barrier was effective the setback wouldn't be necessary. Scott mentioned Southgate met with a group which included himself regarding the drainage issue. Scott stated he would have a problem in voting if the drainage issue was not resolved. Horowitz granted that although there is a lot of traffic in the area, and the residents are aware that the abutt'ng Property is zoned commercial/industrial, she stress he need for the property to remain as a sort of buffer between the disparate areas. Horowitz asked if there was a use which would protect this buffer and not intrude on the neighborhood. Dierks agreed, adding that there seems to be other property in the area which could be better sites. Horowitz questioned Stoffer, asking if the structures could be more residential in design in order to integrate with the neighborhood. She viewed the subdivision as speculative, adding that her approval would be difficult if she didn't know what businesses would open there. Wallace raised the drainage issue for discussion. Scott stated the drainage requirements for the subdivision could alleviate some of the flooding problems in the area, but he added that the issue of flooding outside of the subdivision is not an issue in the decision of extending Boyrum. i Referring to the new site plans, Scott noted two collection points where the road (Boyrum) would be lowered. From the collection points, the water would drain south to reach the swail. become feet lower, Franklin expressed concern that this would cause the ditch to intenance Stoffertwo interjected, saying nthe adeveloper had erealizedlthis and as a consequence, would assume the maintenance. 9ONdIL .1. Planning & Zoning Commission April 28, 1986 Page 4 Scott summarized there were two issues remaining: the drainage and the fencing. When asked if they would be ready to vote if presented more information at the formal meeting Thursday night, the Commission responded in the affirmative. Scott added that the motion must include the access point location, including a specific range of dimensions on the I south exit. Horowitz, in a question to Scott, asked if the similarity of the proposed Boyrum/Highway 6 and the Keokuk/Highway 6 intersections was raised at the meeting involving the developer. Scott replied the issue was not raised. Cooper expressed concern with both the drainage and the stacking lane. Scott outlined that with the 10 car stacking, the exit would allow 7 cars before meeting the stacking. Stoffer mentioned the developer did indicate a willingness to provide vegetation along the fence line. There was a consensus to vote on this item at the formal meeting Thursday night. ZONING ITEMS• 1. Z-8602. Discussion of an application submitted by the Iowa City Crisis Intervention Center for the rezoning of 528 Iowa Avenue from RNC -20 to CB -2; 45 -day limitation period: Waived. Beagle noted the memorandum dated April 25, 1986 included in the staff report packet, correcting the issues raised since the March 24, 1986 report. In summary of the issues and of all previous discussion, Scott advised the Commission to decide if the CB -2 line should be extended to include 528 Iowa Avenue. He urged the Commission members to look at the CB -2 zone and all the permitted uses it includes. He added that parking and occupants are issues not germane to the rezoning issue. Jordan commented that when the area was zoned RNC -20, the neighbors were told it would stay. He strongly discouraged reneging this agreement. There was a consensus to vote on this request at the formal meeting Thursday night. .o• Planning & Zoning Commission May 1, 1986 Page 2 _1 CONSIDERATION OF THE MINUTES OF APRIL 17, 1986: Horowitz moved to approve the minutes of April 17, 1986. Wallace seconded the motion. On page 9, paragraph 4, Scott changed the motion to read "waiver 'of' the preliminary plat." The motion to approve the minutes of April 17, 1986, as corrected carried, 7-0. VACATIIOH�: 1. V-8601. Public discussion of an application submitted by the seventh Day A ven ist Church requesting the vacation of Teeters Court between Rider Street and the CRANDIC rail line. Perry asked if there was a public or private agreement to maintain the drive. Boyle explained an easement would be granted to the neighbor in the residential unit, Dr. Price. Perry assumed Dr. Price is agreeable to the vacation. Beagle responded in the affirmative. Perry moved to approve the vacation of Teeters Court south of Rider Street. Cooper seconded the motion. 7-0. The motion carried unanimously, SUBDIVISION I. S-8605. Public discussion of an application submitted by Southgate eve opment Company for approval of a preliminary and final subdivision Plat of Boyrum Subdivision, Part 3, a 2.52 acre tract between Highland Avenue and Highway 6, east of Gilbert Street; 45 _day limitation period: 5/2/86, 60 -day limitation period: 5/12/86. Ral h Stoffer, 325 E. Washington, Iowa City. Representing the developer, S o er, s ributed new preliminary and final plans which included the following changes requested by the Commission: -Two plats with the parameters of the access points marked. -Extension of the storm water pipe within Highway 6 right-of-way. -Plantings to soften the visual impact of the proposed fence. Scott briefly summarized the discussion thus far. The distance between the rear lot lines on Plum and the proposed Boyrum Street extension will remain the same, 11 feet. The developer has proposed to install a solid wooden fence with plantings for visual and sound dampening properties within the east right-of-way of Boyrum Street. The pavement will remain 28 feet wide on the north portion of the extension. The south portion will have a turning lane allowing stacking of ten cars. The drainage pipe required will be constructed and buried west to the pipe located 93a .o• Planning & Zoning Commission May 1, 1986 Page 3 ^1 under Highway 6. borne by the Cost of signalization at developer, The access Highway 6 and Boyrum will be Preliminary and final plats. Points have been indicated on the Public Discussion: exteNelson1205 Diana Street extension would make her residentiajwa City, Nelson felt the that the need to provide for street into a thoroughfare, proposed expects volumes of traffic, stacking of ten carsadding recalled a potential buyer for the At the previous formalmeeting,n developer age road rather than a through streeterty suggested the use of a front - found to be prohibitive by both engineering explained this idea was access points could Potentiall gineering and Planning y be added to Highway 6, staff since more Nelson also felt the speed limit, currently 45 mph should be lowered to 35 mph. P Scott assumed with increased traffic the In ex r speed would b p essing concerns with increased traffic a lower, would draw more traffic from the other side Of Highway Nelson felt the extension Winifred Holland High�vay 6 on Boyrum, a en ion 1105 Diana, Iowa City, Holland drew the Commission's Kirkwooe bottleneck at the intersection of especially at rush hour, Holland's Diana Street and commercially zoned property, The fencing property been maintained, g servin as y on Diana abuts 9 a screening has not Rose 5 at den 1407 Plum, Iowa City, Spalding felt the agains proposed extension There is other commercial was that no need main argument Highland. property in the areafandthe street exists, those trucks use Gre Cranston, 1409 Plum, Iowa City, Cranston reminded the Commission of e Pe ion circulated by concerned property owners who 0 extension. 166 area residents signed the petition statin extension of Boyrum., Cranston Opposed the the traffic patterns in those the e area, and felt the extension' woulddisruptpeople in the area. He added that and miss wouldn t benefit the previous meeting they thought it best not to member had stated majority of This extension would make five such create double frontage lotsa mission to vote against the extension. Nelson Cranston encouraged 9 the Com - Nelson added to her concerns She felt the development would cause issue trafficrunoff Ing °f Scott interjected that the bod from Highland Avenue, area nearrCath Problems and further Cathy's Candles. Nelson agreed the of water settled flood - but there was standing water on all larger at the flooding of Highland to be of the parameters Portion is there, boundaries. outside the Scott explained the Highway 6, Runoff from Highland is to berameters of the subdivision handled by a system under 93z .V' r Planning F, Zoning Commission 14ay 1, 1986 Page 4 Commission Discussion: Perry questioned the developer two sides of the fence, P whether the street side Stoffer stated theantings were Would be on one or submit I the west side. Scott asked if Southgatenwoulde a plan to the City Forester be ti the Stoffer confirmed the develo er for a be willing to Sion. P would work with of the plantings. the City on this provi- Scott questioned le regarding the accessalp'� t WheWhether separate covenants would After discussion, Boyle suggested maintenance be needed motion, followed b gg the Commission upkeep of the fence. Y amendments first make the Jordan moved t to cover each covenant. main 1 of Boyrum Subdiviioapprove art 605, a preliminary and final 3. Horowitz seconded the subdivision plat Horowitz moved to amend the motion. access points to the two lots as emotion, to re Scott noted Y those specified quire a covenant limiting that this amendment was made ic on the only those noted on the final to restrict final plat. Plat to Lot 2 as a access points to The motion to amend the Permanent record. main motion carried unanimouslY, 7-0. Horowitz moved to amend the i the maintenance and u main motion, stipulating that a covenant for her amendment provided. Perry seconded the the east side of the informal was based on the drawin motion. Horowitz theadd80yrum F meeting, 4128186, #1303, g submitted by the developer attheThe motion to amend the main motion carried unanimous) Discussion on the main motion Y, 7-0' as amended: Perry found it difficult Boyrum for Iowa Cit to see an overall benefit of that the developer h' The majority of Public is O of the extension ed mands. Per has come a long way in meetingOpposed. He commented the Commission's le- Cohad oper agreed, adding that he could not ignore p tion problems with traffic and . Public not only because water runoff, Horowitz statedsh t. He also Kirkwood also on the neighborhoodat�ve impact and the traffic her op9os turbed. The harmony between residm immediately jacent Of Huphwto tial and commercial would be dis- tHorowitz amended the main motion, requesting approval subject Of legal papers. e I ried, 7-0. Y seconded the motion. The moti nte to a review i amend car- ,05 ar- ) 1 932 .o1 Planning & Zoning Commission May 1, 1986 Page 5 Chairperson Scott declared a roll call vote on the main motion as amended: Jordan yes Cooper no Dierks no Horowitz no Perry no Wallace no Scott yes The motion failed, 2-5. ZONING MATTERS: 1. Z-8602. Public discussion of an application submitted by the Iowa City rZ sis Intervention Center for the rezoning of 528 Iowa Avenue from RNC -20 to CB -2; 45 -day limitation period: waived. Beagle "reviewed the original staff report of March 31, 1986, recommending approval of the use of conditional zoning for the property to accommodate the Crisis Center. The approval was recommended based on the assumption that the present office use of the facility was a conforming use in the RNC -20 zone. Subsequently, the planning staff has learned the law office housed in the structure is an illegal use. Staff has revised its recom- mendation based upon this information. Staff feels to maintain the present RNC-20/CB-2 boundary line is the most appropriate and consistent with the zoning map and Comprehensive Plan designation for this area. Therefore, staff recommends the request for rezoning be denied. Horowitz asked if documentation had been received from the Agudas Achim Synagogue offering additional parking for the Center. Beagle stated that no papers had been received. Public Discussion: Ken K auppi, Director of the Crisis Intervention Center. In reference to e classification of the Crisis Center, Kauppi stated they thought of themselves as more akin to a Sunday school than a commercial enterprise. He continued that the Center has no intention to raise the present struc- ture, but would instead improve it. Kauppi mentioned he was surprised by the opposition of people in the area. He explained the synagogue has offered the needed 15 spaces if it would help with the rezoning, and have given their informal approval, Kauppi stated his satisfaction with the Commission and the Planning Department for the thoroughness and attention given to all the issues. Horowitz asked Kauppi if the food donated would be dropped off from the alley. Kauppi affirmed. Horowitz questioned if the Center is planning an addition to accommodate the drop off. Kauppi affirmed. 'fix .o• r k. -.A C RESOLUTION NO. 89_187_1 58 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE CONVEYANCE OF URBAN RENEWAL PARCEL 93-3 FROM THE BREESE COMPANY INC. RATION. TO THE UNIVERSITY OF IOWA FACILITIES CORPO- 1 WHEREAS, the City of Iowa City,, Iowa, a municipal corporation, did enter into a Contract for Sale of Land for Private Redevelopment with Anna and Robert Rath on September 51978, for the Parcel 93-3, legally described as followsrchase of Urban Renewal Disposition The west 40 feet un the City, Johnson Countsouth 100 feet of Lot 5, Block 93, Iowa thereof; y, Iowa, according to the recorded plat and WHEREAS, the City Council, by Resolution 79-386, consented to a transfer of the interest in Urban Renewal Disposition Parcel 93-3 of Robert and Anna Rath to the Breese Company, Inc.; and WHEREAS, the Breese Company, Inc., wishes to convey the property University of Iowa Facilities Corporation for redevelopment of the parcel he in accordance with the proposal statement and to the hereto; and conceptual site plan attached WHEREAS, the City has reviewed the transfer documents, and has received from the parties thereto the assurances necessary for compliance with Article V, Section 503, Part II of the Contract for Sale of Land for Private Redevelop- ment, and found them acceptable. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF IOWA CITY, IOWA; That, subject to the transferee's assumption of all of the obligations of the Redeveloper under the Contract for Sale of Land for Private Redevelopment, recorded in Book 526, P. 230 in the Office of the Johnson County Recorder the City. of Iowa City University of Iowa Fachereby consents to the conveyance of Parcel 93-3 to the ilities Corporation. , It was moved by McDonald the Resolution be adopted, and upon roll call ansectheoe were; Y Dickson AYES; NAYS: t ABSENT: X X Ambrisco X Baker X Courtney X Dickson X McDonald Strait X Zuber 9.P3 Resolution No. 87-158 Page p Passed and approved this 30th day of A " 1981. .� /L. PA OR ATTEST: �•i'bLCRR 8y Me�j g , o p"rov ed oikrg L 1�� X33 I PARKING i 22 4 I I I E SITE PLAN ALLEY I Fi. ulII'I`; I Lo�plµ I I SERVICEI i TKCSH LJ pLFI INCr /, +I I NCE I� .93-3 li i NORTH I MADISON i .P' . !W �M • STATEMENT OF THE DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL OF UNIVERSITY OF IOWA FACILITIES CORPORATION The undersigned, University of Iowa Facilities Corporation, proposes to acquire Urban Renewal Parcel Number 93-3 from the Breese Company, Inc., and to develop said parcel as open space in accordance with the ordinances and regulations of the City of the City of Iowa City, Iowa. Attached hereto is a plat plan showing the development plan proposed by the undersigned for Parcel Number 93-3. UNIVERSITY OF IOWA FACILITIES CORPORATION M 'J� 3 .o• City of Iowa City MEMORANDUM Date: June 25, 1987 To; City Council From: Patt Cain, Economic Development Coordinator p, Re: Conveyance of Urban Renewal Parcel 93-3 The Breese Company, Inc., owner of Parcel 93-3 (a 4,000 square foot portion of the property at the northeast corner of Madison and Court Streets), wishes to sell its entire property at this location to the University of Iowa Fa- cilities Corporation, The University of Iowa will lease and, in time, ac- quire the property from the Facilities Corporation through a lease/purchase arrangement. Improvements on the property will be expanded and converted to use as laboratory space for the College of Engineering. Because it has never completed the improvements described in the existing Contract for Sale of Parcel 93-3 for Private Redevelopment, the Breese Com- pany must obtain written approval from the City to sell this parcel. For this approval to be granted subject to the conditions of the existing contract, the City must receive the following assurances: 1. The proposed transferee has the qualifications and financial responsibil- ity necessary and adequate to fulfill the obligations of its development proposal. The Facilities Corporation will submit its annual financial statement for examination by the City. 2. The proposed transferee will assume all of the obligations of the Redeveloper under the existing contract and will agree to be subject to all the conditions and restrictions to which the redeveloper is subject, and the legal documents effecting the transfer must be acceptable to the City. The Assistant City Attorney has been told that the proposed deed will include required language making the transferee liable for performance of the Urban Renewal contract, If so drafted, the legal documents will be acceptable. 3. The consideration payable for Parcel 93-3 by the buyer does not exceed the actual cost to the Breese Company of the property. The City will receive a letter from the Breese Company attesting to this fact, If Council deems that all legal requirements have been met, passage of the resolution approving the conveyance of Parcel 93-3 will allow the transaction to be finalized, bj4/6 933 .o• J P. CESE- P.O. e0 %u8) IOWA OITY. 10 WAS 44 13181337.ZI39 AUTO PARTS STORES THE i2 City Council 6 June 1987 City of Iowa City Civic Center 410 East Washington Street Iowa City, Iowa 52240 Good blorning; I This is in regards to I Breese the transfer Streets Co., Inc. at the Of the , from The BreesesCothwest corner Of Mad' Property owned b Facilities Co Inc, Madison and Y The I 83-3 rporation, Said to the Universit Court Property includes Y of Iowa Urban Renewal Parcel The consideration for the transfer Mutuallyi -agreed valuation for whole PPer y b Nobased u made for sub -parcels, thePon a The Breese Co, valuation was Parcel 93-3 . Inc, will not receive consideration by the fact excess of that paid for said Parcel, Avenue that the n for Urban Renewal in Iowa Cit Investment in our new the Y, far exceeds property, Th. Is suPPorted property at the corner exceeds ds th considerationat 611 Southgate Madison and Court Streets0 to breceived for ' Si�gicerel �y rs, homas R. Breese Js President i cc; David P. Charles qPOnla, attorney , 6fullen, attorney 9.�s ALLEY C V :m J • I SIS: I ENTRANCE ro, I PLAN 1'-0" • II MADISON L -OA - SERVICE Pd rz'I f .V y I � i ALLEY . i i . PARKING 22, &tOR T {� SITE PLAN 1/ 16" = V-0" MADISON RESOLUTION NO. 87-lsg RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING CONVEYANCE OF A FOUR FOOT WIDE SEWER EASEMENT ALONG THE EASTERLY BORDER OF PLAZA MINI -PARK ABUTTING THE PAUL -HELEN BUILDING AS PART OF A RECIPROCAL EASEMENT AGREEMENT BY WHICH THE CITY WILL ACQUIRE FROM THE OWNER OF THE PAUL -HELEN BUILDING AN EASEMENT TO USE AN EIGHTEEN INCH STRIP OF LAND ABUTTING THE WESTERLY WALL OF THAT BUILDING FOR PLANTER BOXES FOR THE PLAZA MINI -PARK. WHEREAS, the City Council did, by Resolution No. 87-134, adopted on June 16, 1987, evidence its intent and proposal to convey a sewer line easement, and did authorize publication of notice of its proposal with regard thereto, and did set the date and time for public hearing thereon; and WHEREAS, following the public hearing on the proposal, and being fully advised as to the merits of the proposal, in consideration of the mutual easement grants, covenants and agreements contained in the Reciprocal Easement Agreement which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, the City Council deems the proposed conveyance of an easement to be in the best interest of the City of Iowa City, Iowa. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF IOWA CITY, IOWA, THAT: 1. The Reciprocal Easement Agreement attached hereto is hereby approved as to form and content. 2. The Mayor and the City Clerk are hereby authorized, empowered and directed to execute the Reciprocal Easement Agreement. I i 3. The City Attorney is hereby authorized, empowered and directed to deliver the Reciprocal Easement Agreement upon receipt of an executed copy thereof from the other party to that Agreement, Hawkeye-Bay States Ltd. Partnership. 4. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to record the Agreement in the Office of the Johnson County Recorder. It was moved by McDonald and seconded by Strait the Resolution be adopted, and upon roll call there were: AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: X Ambrisco X Baker X Courtney _X Dickson X McDonald X Strait X Zuber ° Passed and approved this 30th day of June 1987. P OR L AITEST: _%!f „J �I Resolved & Approve. by The Legal legal Department ilLSd'7 ,o• i I I i RECIPROCAL EASEMENT AGREENEMR This Reciprocal Easement Agreement is entered into by and between Hawkeye. Bay States Ltd. Partnership ('H-BSLP-) and the City of Iowa City, Iowa ('City'). I. Easement Grant to Cit Hawkeye-Bay States Ltd. Partnership hereby grants to the City an easement Permitting the City to construct, operate antl maintain planter boxes in conjunction with operation and maintenance of the Plaza Mint -Park (located at the northeast corner of Washington Street and City Plaza), over, upon, along and across the real estate located in Iowa City, Johnson County, Iowa, described as follows: Commencing at the northwest corner of Lot 4, Block 65, Original Town of Iowa City, Johnson County, Iowa, according to the recorded plat thereof; thence North 90000'00' East, an assumed bearing, along the southerly right-of-way line of Washington Street, 60.28 feet to the Point of beginning; thence South 00003'02' West 110.36 /eet; thence South 89043'36' West 1.50 feet; thence Horth 00003'02' East 36.36 feet; thence South 89043'36' West 2.50 feet; thence North 00003'02' East 18.0 feet; thence North 89043'36' East 2.50 feet; thence North 00003'02' East 56.0 feet; thence North 90000'OO' East, an assumed bearing, along the southerly right-of-way line of Washington Street, 1.50 feet, to the point of beginning (hereinafter 'the City ease- ment'). Except as provided hereinafter, the City shall Indemnify H-8SLP against any loss or damage which shall be caused by the exercise of its rights hereunder, or by any wrongful or negligent act or omission of the City or Of its agents or employees in the course of their employment while exer- cising the City's rights hereunder. Notwithstanding the foregoing, H-BSLP agrees that the City's design plans for the Plaza Mini -Park redevelopment provide reasonable protection to the Paul -Helen Building (which is located on the following described property, to -wit: Lot 3 and the East 20 feet Of the North 74 feet of Lot 4, all in Block 65, Original Town of Iowa 93s -2- City, Johnson County, Cita) from water damage during park reconstruction water damage antl operation, and the City shall have no liability or responsibility for to the Building which may occur after the date hereof, II• Easement Grant to Hawke e - Ba States Ltd. Partnershf The City hereby grants to H-BSLP an easement along, across and under a four foot strip of land abutting the above-described City easement area for the installation, operation and maintenance aof a sewer line, together With a right of Ingress to and egress from this easement over City prop- erty adjacent thereto. City also grants to H-BSLP the right to use City property for purposes of excavating for repair, maintenance, replacement or removal of the sewer -BSLP agree Pipes and Ns that in any such event It will restore any plaza M{nf-Park Improvements disturbed by such work to the same condition such Improvements were In Immediately prior to such work. H-BSLP shall indemnify the City against any loss or dam ge which shall be caused by exercise of its rights hereunder, or by any wrongful or negl{_ gent act or amiss ion of N-BSLP, or of its agents or employees in the course of their employment, while exercising H-BSLP's rights hereunder, iIII. Mutual Covenants Each party reserves the right to use the area to which It is gan easement hereunder for purposes ranting Darty's which Oil not Interfere full enjoyment of the rights hereby granted, with other -, Each party does hereby covenant with the other that It Is lawfu nod possessed of the real estate to whilly seized that it has a ch It Is granting an easement; and good and lawful right to convey it, or any part thereof, A' 9jas .1. ee .3 - The provisions hereof shall inure to the benefit of and bind the succes- sors and assigns of the respective parties hereto, and all covenants shall apply to and run with the land. DATED this fall" day of �s - C t , 1987, HAWKEYE-04Y STATES LTD. PARTNERSHIP CITY OF IOWA CITY 8y: p,!' , t�_peral Partner ayor Attest State of Iowa ) SS: Johnson County ) on this (cid day of , A 1987, before me, the under- signed, as No -far ' ry M11C in a for the State of Iowa, personally appeared �.��.,.. �olna�z� to me personally known, who being Ty- ft, du ly sworn, d ld say that person is one of the partners of Hawkeye-Bay States Ltd. Partnership, a limited partnership, and that the Instrument was signed on behalf of the partnership by authority of the partners and the partner acknowledged the execution of the instrument to be the voluntary act and deed of the partnership, by it and by the partner voluntarily executed. s s_ notary Public in and 4or—t e a e o'ow'T a State of Iowa ) ) SS: Johnson County ) On this 30th day of .lime 1987 , before me, the under- signed, a Rotary Public n ani d for personally appeared William J. Ambrisco and Marian K. Karr, to me personally known, who being by me duly sworn, did say that they are the Mayor and City Clerk, respectively, of said municipal corporation executing the within and foregoing instru- ment; that the seal affixed hereto is the seal of said municipal corpora- tion by authority of Its City Council of said municipal corporation, and that the said William J. Ambrisco and Marian K. Karr acknowledged the execution of said Instrument to be the voluntary act and deed of said municipal corporation, by it and by them voluntarily executed. otary Tuollc to dnL for Johnson County, Iowa Received 3 Apu,ovaa my legal Dop.rtsnald q3s .V' eozee=errvt KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS; CITY DEED That the Cityan of Iowa City, Iowa, a municipal corporation el Johnson and the State of Iowa, by Its Mayor and Cit remise of Three Thousand r k the County remise, convey and and Unto .e ors ({3,000 y Clerk, in constd- and its successors andt ssiclaim unto the Hawke e- l does hereby release, Interest in and to the follognr ('Grantee" Y BaY States Ltd Partnership Of Johnson and State of 9-describedl' all of its rights, title and Iowa; Dremises located In the County Commencing at the northwest corner of Lot 4, Black 65, Town of Iowa CRY, Johnson thenceC north foga, according to Original ire corded plat thereof; Smed treetbearing' along the southerly light 90 00'00" east 0000 60.28 feet to the 9 of -way line of Washington feet- 02" west 110.36 feet; thence Of be inniing; thence south feet; thence north 00003'02" east 36.36 89eo 3 36" 89°43'36" west 2.50 feet. west 1.50 thence north 89043'36" thence north 00°03'02" easthe18.0 feet• east 56.0 feet; thence east 2.00 feet; thence north ° along the southerl r ^ort. 90 00'00" east, an assumed 0hear{02" feet, to the Y i9ht-of-way 11ne of Washington g' point of beginning. 9 Street, 1.50 subject to the following; mnFirst, easements restrictions, and covenants Including but not limited to an easement for ti located on or under the of record, specifically surface of said property; public utility lines, if any, o Second, the P Perty; and corded {n 000 terms and c°nditfons of the Cit Page 156. Johnson taunt s Urban Renewal plan, re - Third. the project a Y Recorder's Office; antl on transfer se[ forth and completion re velopment" recorded in Boak 78gntract for a OfLan requirements and limitations Office; and , at a e Sale of Land for private Rede - Page 9 loft, Johnson County Recorder's a Feer th a covenant by Grant e�tthe emave son now and ice frau a feet wide extending south from under. 11 for 74,0 feet, and abutt SOnow right-of-way linerOf ten (10) a g the property being Washing. III WITNESS WHEREOF conveyed here- to be executed the City of Iowa City, [owa, t, its seal °^ Its behalf by Its Mayor, attested caused this e to be affixed hereto instrument 9 : this 27th day of MaY. 1987 he FILEpClerk. and 1�'S�� 3 f/®OF lOWq CITY "00I. y(h� p1rc-� V PORATE SEAtI,P`,/�I-7 N-1 ATTEST: Transfau�S F°� J.1 .1fiel fUi ".jC -. [ Clerk ) Raw Fas Iii s On aql of M toote me,Personally 27th day Personally,alpear before me, a Notary public Iowa, they area then Mayor kand nC it nA. who, W1111am J. Ambrlsco and MariandK for the Iowa', that the seal affixed Clerk' respectb by duly sworn, did sayKarr, seal sof the cor Ord the foregoingY. of the city of Iowa citaG behalf of the for at ion, and that the In struent Instru mens is the Corporate' o Resolution No Pg 86t 22B passedhor it signed and sealed aon Council, on tha 15th da (the of Itut Resolution aCouncil. by contained Harlan K. Karr ac know?edged thelY, 1906, and that W1111am Jl, Y the Cit voluntary act and deed and the voluntargecuty of the Instrument Ambrisce antl by It voluntarily executed. Y act and to be their deed of the corporation, NOTARIALSEAL , yen m n and ror te ate or owa VOL .n,% IA;I Q?8 7,00 .V' IOWA CITY & CORALVILLE CONVENTION & VISITORS BUREAU i mmerce Center 325 Co CO E. Washington P.O. Box 2358 JUN 12 1987 Iowa City. Iowa 52744 (319) 337.6592 ! June 11, 1987 CRY CLERK i To: Mayor Ambrisco and City Council Mayor Kattchee and City Council IFrom: Ron Farber, President Could you appoint a Director to serve:a-trio-year__term from July I 1, 1987 to June 30, 1989 on the bureau's..Board'of-Directors? In Article IV. Board of Directors, Section. 2J�it: reads, The number of Directors of the Corporation'sdel1-be designated as follows: (a) one Director designated by the Cit Iowa. y Council, Of Coralville, (b) one Director designated by the Cit Iowa.,, of Iowa City, Iowa." Following that it indicates, "The Directors representing the respective citirs es. . .shall serve terms of two years each." IOur records indicate that Darrel Courtney started his designated term on July 1, 1985 and it will expire on_June-30, 1987.• j David d on lcomb's term 6. re -designated' ori' July It 1984'and I expired on June 30, 1986. Normally, the bureau meets the third Tuesday of the month at 4 p.m. at Commerce Center. The meetings last about one hour. Please notify me when a decision has been reached s j these people of the exact meetio I can inform is337-6697ng date in July. My phone number Thank you.and best wishes. r I I '- 938 •a• W i4 RESOLUTION NO. 87-160 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO SIGN AND THE CITY CLERK TO ATTEST AN APPLICATION TO THE IOWA DOT CAPITAL MATCH LOAN BANK. WHEREAS, the City of Iowa City has a municipal transit system; and WHEREAS, the City Council has authorized the application for Federal funds to assist in the financing of Iowa City Transit's FY88 program of Section 9 capital projects; and WHEREAS, funds are available from the Iowa DOT Capital Match Loan Bank to provide interest-free loans of local match funds to Iowa public transit systems. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF IOWA CITY, IOWA, AS FOLLOWS: 1. That the Mayor is authorized to execute an application for funds from the Iowa DOT Capital Match Loan Bank, to finance the local share amount of $96,000 for Iowa City Transit's FY88 Section 9 program of capital pro- jects. 2. That the $96,000 will be repaid in four equal payments of $24,000 in 1989, 1990, 1991, and 1992. 3. That JCCOG staff is authorized to file any additional information re- quired by the Iowa DOT in conjunction with this project. It was moved by Baker and seconded by _ Courtney the Resolution be adopted, and upon roll call there were: AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: X Ambrisco X Baker X Courtney X Dickson X McDonald X Strait X Zuber Passed and approved this 30th day of June 1987. MAYOR ' ATTEST: CITY -CLERK JP01/- RESOLUTION NO. 87-161 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING MAYOR TO SIGN AND THE CITY CLERK TO ATTEST A SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT WITH BLACK & VEATCH FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO THE WATER TREATMENT FACILITY CONTROL SYSTEM WHEREAS, the City of Iowa City, Iowa, has negotiated a Supplemental Agreement with Black & Veatch, a copy of said Supplemental Agreement being attached to this Resolution and by this reference made a part hereof, and, WHEREAS, the City Council deems it in the public interest to enter into said Supplemental Agreement with Black & Veatch for Engineering services for the Water Treatment Facility Control System, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: ! 1. That the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to execute the Supplemental Agreement with Black & Veatch. 2. That the City Clerk shall furnish copies of said a Supplemental Agreement to any citizen requesting same. { It was moved by Courtney and seconded by Baker that the resolution as read be adopted, and upon roll call there were: AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: X Ambrisco X Baker X Courtney X Dickson X McDonald X Strait X Zuber Passed and approved this 30th day of June, 1987. OR ATTEST: �_ CIT CLERK Ived Approved Qj Department /c4S"b �� 9?Ila r I 1 RESOLUTION NO. 87-161 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING MAYOR TO SIGN AND THE CITY CLERK TO ATTEST A SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT WITH BLACK & VEATCH FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO THE WATER TREATMENT FACILITY CONTROL SYSTEM WHEREAS, the City of Iowa City, Iowa, has negotiated a Supplemental Agreement with Black & Veatch, a copy of said Supplemental Agreement being attached to this Resolution and by this reference made a part hereof, and, WHEREAS, the City Council deems it in the public interest to enter into said Supplemental Agreement with Black & Veatch for Engineering services for the Water Treatment Facility Control System, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: ! 1. That the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to execute the Supplemental Agreement with Black & Veatch. 2. That the City Clerk shall furnish copies of said a Supplemental Agreement to any citizen requesting same. { It was moved by Courtney and seconded by Baker that the resolution as read be adopted, and upon roll call there were: AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: X Ambrisco X Baker X Courtney X Dickson X McDonald X Strait X Zuber Passed and approved this 30th day of June, 1987. OR ATTEST: �_ CIT CLERK Ived Approved Qj Department /c4S"b �� 9?Ila .P' SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT FOR DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION PHASE SERVICES COMPUTER AND CONTROL SYSTEM IOWA CITY; IOWA WATER TREATMENT PLANT The purpose of this SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT is to define the engineering services which Black S Veatch, Engineers -Architects, hereinafter called the Consultant, is to provide to the City of Iowa City, Iowa, hereinafter called the City, in conjunction with the design and construction of improvements to the Computer and Control System for the City's water treatment plant. This Agreement supplements the CONTRACT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES between the Consultant and the City, which is dated January 27, 1987. SECTION I - SCOPE OF SERVICES Under the terms of this SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT, the Consultant agrees to perform design and construction phase engineering services for improvements and modifications to the Computer and Control System at the Iowa City Water Treatment Plant. The system to be constructed shall be as generally described in the Recommendations section of the Study Report for Data Acquisition and Control System, Iowa City, Iowa Water Treatment Plant, which was prepared for the City by the Consultant in April of 1987. Services to be provided shall include those activities described in the revised Scope of Services for Design Phase and Construction Services which is attached to this SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT. This revised Scope of Services clarifies and expands the Scope of Design Services which was included in the original Contract. Revisions have been made to comply with the results of the study and report. SECTION II - COMPENSATION For the services covered by this SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT, the City agrees to pay the Consultant as follows: B. PHASE II - DESIGN SERVICES. For design services as described in SECTION I - SCOPE OF SERVICES of this SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT, direct personnel expenses times a multiplier of 2.10 plus reimbursable expenses at direct cost. The maximum billing limit for this work shall be Sixty Thousand Dollars and No Cents ($60,000.00), unless additional work is authorized by a Supplemental Agreement. Partial periodic payments shall be made to the Consultant monthly propor- tionate to progress on the work as reported by the Consultant. Itemized statements shall be provided with each request for payment to document the progress and effort expended. 061787 9os .1. s C. PHASE III - CONSTRUCTION SERVICES. For engineering services during the installation and start-up of the new control system, direct personnel expenses times a multiplier of 2.10 plus reimbursable expenses at direct cost. The maximum billing limit for this work will be Eighteen Thousand Five Hundred Dollars and No Cents 018,500.00), unless further work is authorized by Supplemental Agreement. Payment for construction phase services shall be as outlined in Section II of the original Contract. Direct personnel expenses and reimbursable expenses shall be as defined in SECTION IV of the original Contract. Supplemental services shall be provided on a cost times a multiplier basis as described in Section II D of the CONTRACT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES. Billing procedures, reimbursable costs, and all other items pertaining to compensation not specifically described or modified herein shall be as described in Section II of the original Contract. SECTION IV - OTHER MATTERS It is mutually understood and agreed: 061787 A. That the billing limits stated herein are based upon the SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT being approved by July 10, 1987 and the start of work for each phase being authorized according to the dates listed below: PHASE II - DESIGN SERVICES: July 15, 1987 PHASE III - CONSTRUCTION SERVICES: November 15, 1987 If the start of work for either phase is not authorized by the dates listed above, the billing amounts shall be appropriately adjusted to reflect increased coats if requested by the Consultant. B. That all the terms of the original CONTRACT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES not specifically revised or changed by this SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT for design phase services shall remain unchanged and in full force. 2 14W I .o• ill IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT on this 30th day of June , 1987. FOR THE CITY OF IOWA CITY, IOWA #bw1v 8i dApproved al Del arhnwd I as�87 � MAYOR 061787 Attest: CITY CLERK FORBLACK6 VEATCH, Engineers—Architects Willis D. Skinner, Par/IZV Attest: ' L J. L McNitt 3 9vts 0 .a• IOWA CITY, IOWA WATER PLANT CONTROL SYSTEM PROJECT REVISED SCOPE OF SERVICES PHASE II — DESIGN PHASE Task No. 201. Receive Notice to Proceed with Design Black 6 Veatch will meet with the City to discuss the results of the study phase as they relate to the costs and schedule for engineering services. At the completion of any necessary negotiations and upon receipt of a notice to proceed, design phase services will begin. 202. Inventory Existing Instrumentation Black 6 Veatch design team members will visit the site to inventory all existing instrumentation to facilitate its replacement as mended in study application will ebemereport. c evaluated todeterminethe bestreplacementt for reliability and accuracy. 203. Prepare Preliminary Design Documents A set of preliminary drawings for the control system will be prepared to serve as a basis of information for the prequalification process. The preliminary drawings will consist of a basic control room plan, overall control system schematics, input/output schedules, and a power supply schematic including normal and emergency power sources. Instrumentation drawings will not be included in the prequalification documents. 204. Prepare Prequalification Documents The prequalification documents will consist of an invitation to prequalify, instructions to prequalifiers, the set of preliminary drawings, preliminary technical specifications for the control system equipment in Black 6 Veatch standard format, and a description of basic software requirements. 205. Meet with the Water Department The project team will meet with the City to discuss the preliminary and prequalificationndocuments procedures.ano answer The documents will be revised in response to the City's comments. 051387 1 opolf .P' r i 206. Issue Prequalification Documents A listing of potential suppliers of the control system will be developed and submitted to the City along with a copy of the invitation to prequalify for local publication in accordance with Iowa City procurement procedures. Black & Veatch will issue prequalification documents to interested suppliers. The project team will respond to questions raised by suppliers during preparation of prequalification submittals. 207. Evaluate Prequalification Submittals The prequalification submittals will be evaluated to determine which suppliers have the resources, expertise, and capability to provide the control system equipment. A letter recommending a list of prequalified suppliers will be presented to the City. 208. Complete Final Design - New Equipment The final design will be completed and will result in the preparation of detailed drawings and technical specifications for the control system. Detailed software requirements will be developed and incorporated. Specifications will be prepared using Black & Veatch standard format. 1 20BA. Complete Final Design - Instrumentation The final design for instrumentation will consist of a list of field instrumentation recommended for replacement, and standard specifications on individual field devices as required. It is anticipated that these documents would be used by the City to procure the instrumentation and arrange for its installation independent of the control system contract. 209. Complete Final Design - Control Room Modifications Detailed electrical plans will be developed for lighting revisions in the control room as recommended in the study report. 210. Review City of Iowa City Standard Contract Documents The City's standard "front-end" documents will be reviewed for coordination with Black & Veatch technical documents. Significant differences will be reported and discussed. 211. Prepare Bid Documents The technical documents will be prepared incorporating the results of the prequalification process. Five copies of the technical documents will be provided to the City for review. 212. Conduct Quality Control Review All calculations, opinions of cost, drawings, and specifications will be given an independent quality control review by Senior 051387 2 9*s I .P' Engineers. In addition, the specifications and drawings will be reviewed by the Head of the Electrical Department and the Project Manager. 213. Meet with the Water De artmen[ A meeting will be held to review the documents with the Water Department staff and to answer any questions. The comments received from the Water Department will final bid documents. be incorporated into the 214. Provide Ready to Bid Documents Black d Veatch will provide, to the Water Department, 30 copies of thetechnicaldocuments. 215. Administer Project Project administration services will include periodic reviews of the project work by the Project Manager, Project Engineer, and key staff members to ensure compliance with required schedules and budgets, review of time and expense charges, and preparation of billings and progress reports. Project administration will also include contact with the city to assure that all project needs are being met in a timely and satisfactory manner. Regular progress letters will be prepared and contacts will be made as needed. The object of these activities is to oversee progress and provide direction to the work so that it will be performed in a manner satisfactory to all parties. 051387 3 for .P' r IOWA CITY, IOWA WATER PLANT CONTROL SYSTEM PROJECT REVISED SCOPE OF SERVICES PHASE III - CONSTRUCTION 301. Issue Bid Documents The City will issue final bid documents to potential contractors. Black & Veatch will answer questions during the bidding period as necessary. Black & Veatch will also attend one Pre -Bid Conference and prepare the technical portion of any addenda necessary. After receipt of bids, Black & Veatch will evaluate the bids and make a recommendation to the City regarding award of the contracts. 302. Evaluate Bids Black & Veatch will summarize and evaluate the information submitted by each control system supplier with the bids and make recommendations to the City. Services under this task could also include trips accompanying Water Department personnel to demonstration sites to view potential suppliers' existing installations as a supplemental service. 303. Conduct Preconstruction Conference Black & Veatch will attend one Pre -Construction Conference conducted by the City. The purpose of this conference will be to familiarize all participants of both contracts with the appropriate procedures to be followed, as well as alert each party to potential conflict and required coordination. 304. Review Equipment Design/Quality Assurance 061287 Black & Veatch will review the definitive design information (shop drawings) for compliance with the contract requirements, and conduct subsequent design reviews as required to determine compliance with specifications and to resolve any problems which may occur during manufacturing. Black & Veatch will assist the City and the supplier in preparing and reviewing a factory acceptance testing procedure which will provide a thorough and fair test of the system prior to shipment. Black & Veatch will include requirements in the contract for the supplier to provide all necessary drawings, manuals, and software documentation required to install, operate, and maintain the control system. Black & Veatch will review all vendor -provided documents for adequacy and compliance with contract requirements. 1 ?OUT .V' Contract documents will include provisions for a complete review of the vendor's complete original submittal plus one complete resubmittal. If more than one resubmittal is required for vendoval, the cost of the review will be the responsibility of the 305. Review Applications for Payment Black 6 Veatch will review the contractor's applications for payment (both partial and final) and make recommendations to the City. Monthly processing of payment requests and record-keeping will be performed by the City. 306. Attend Factory Acceptance Testing acceptanceFactory testing the manufacturerimmediatelybefore shipment. They testingstem will be based upon procedures proposed by the manufacturer and reviewed and approved by Black S Veatch. 307. Inspect Installation and Initial Checkout Project team members will be available for engineering assistance during the field installation and initial checkout of the system, to provide technical assistance as required, to observe installation, and to witness field tests which demonstrate correct operation before initial field acceptance. One field visit for a duration of five working days is included for this purpose. 308. Review Vendor r T=ng Black 6 Veatch will include requirements in the specifications for the supplier to provide all necessary operation and maintenance training for Water Department personnel. If necessary, Black 6 Veatch will also provide supplemental training based on special request of the Water Department, and as a supplemental service not included in the original contract. 309. Inspect for Final Acceptance Black 6 Veatch will witness final acceptance and provide managerial/technical assistance to determine that all discrepancies have been corrected and that the control system has been adequately tested. 061287 N 7" .1. 16 City of Iowa City MEMORANDUM Date: June 24, 1987 To: Steve Atkins, City Manager From: Chuck Schmadeke, Cathy Eisenhofer, Edward Brinton Re: Replacing the Water Plant Computer and Control System We have received the Study Report for the Data Acquisition and Control System from our engineering consultants, Black & Veatch. A. The situation is: 1. Our existing computer is 15 years old. Many of the control func- tions are no longer working. 2. Our service contract with Control Data Corporation, the manufac- turer, will be terminated in September, 1987. We may not be able to obtain any spare parts nor any guarantee of service after this time. 3. The computer and control software is not convertible to a modern system because of age and advances in the technology. Changes to the control logic are nearly impossible and very expensive. 4. Many of our field instruments which convert water level, water pressure, or flow rates to electric signals must also be replaced. These instruments all work but were designed for the existing computer and control system. The electrical signals are not compatible with any modern control system. 5. There are a few water quality monitoring instruments which need to be replaced because they do not work due to age or condition. Examples of these are the turbidimeters which measure how dirty the water is. 6. There is no auxilliary power supply for the computer or control system. During lightning storms the system is likely to shut down if there is a momentary disruption in power. B. The consultant, Black & Veatch, recommend: 1. Replace the existing main frame computer with two small, indus- trial microcomputers. These are called programmable logic con- trollers. One would be located in the main control room and the other would be located in the pump room. 9os i .o• z z• The new control system would have the electronic several locations near the process equipment rather ized in the control room, hardware in acquisition and This is called a distributed central- acquisition basket. control system: All the eggs will not be in one 3. The main control room will have two microcomputer terminals and two printers. These will be used by several similar These PC's will; other city offices. to IBM PC's which are being a. Display plant processes in graphic form. b. Detect and report um alarm condition such as power low pressure at a P P g station. outage or c• Allow processing of plant operational data for reports such as how many pounds of chemicals were consumed d. Allow the operators to makeach month. processes neer e changes to the plant equipment and Y by using the computer terminal keyboard. 4• A third microcomputer terminal will be connected control system. This terminal is the new one 1987 for use to the plant 1987 in the water business office Purchased in June, terminal will matin access f uture water meter forsystem inventory control, preparation of reports and to Plant operating data for monitoring, statistical work. 5. Nearly all the field instruments located in the water be replaced with new ones which will be compatible with the control system. Plant must 5• Some additional new instruments are to be included to replace the ones which are not working. Examples of this group would be new turbi- dimeters to replace the 1973 models. 7. An uninterruptible power supply will be provided to stable, clean source of electrical Power for the new control system. assure a 8. A diagram of the new control system is attached for your informa- tion. C. The financial situation is; I. The consultants estimate the costs for the new system are which includes; b500,000 a. engineering fees. b. furnishing and installation of electronic hardware. C, furnishing new field instruments. 9*s i 3 d. new control system software. e* operator training and operations manual. f. removal of old equipment. 2. The Finance Director used ;300,000 for bond repayments when calcu- lating water rate increases. 3. The remainder of the costs will come. come from excess operating in - D• The City action required is: I. An amendment is needed for the Black 8 Veatch engineering agree- ment for: a, design services I b. preparation of bidding documents I c. evaluation of vendor proposals d. review of manufacturer's construction documents e. assisting with operator training I f. start-up and product inspector services. 2. The amendment has been reviewed and negotiated b I' thors. Copies are submitted for your review and approvalthree au - E. The schedule is: 1. Receive proposals from vendors and select the equipment, software l and services by late fall. 2. Install and start-up the new system by the fall of Ig88. bdw3/3 i i 9W .w • MASS STORAGE CPU z 0 PROGRAMMABLE r= cc CONTROLLER R C5 v, U U o. s z ¢ 1/0 RACK Al J W. a z OPERATOR OPERR70R CONSOLE CONSOLE REPORT ALARM / 1 F PRINTEERIN R PRINTER IN / / VI / VIER MATER PLANT BUSINESS OFFICE IPROVIDED BY OWNER) z 0 r= cc v, PROGRAMMRBLE CONTROLLER B o. s R W. z N I/O RACK 81 B !a� c &vaatcn IOWA CITY. IOWA � � MATER PLANT CONTROL SYSTEM FIGURE 1 QCT 133691691 .101 BLOCK DIAGRAM CCG. DWG. NO: 13691-101-76} w .o• e RESOLUTION NO. 87-162 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO SIGN AND THE CITY CLERK TO ATTEST AN AGREEMENT IJITH GWG INVESTMENTS AND NEW PIONEER COOPERATIVE SOCIETY, INC. AUTHORIZING PLACEMENT OF A SOFFIT ON PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY AT THE CORNER OF WASHINGTON AND VAN BUREN STREETS. WfiEREAS, GWG Investments, a partnership ("GWG") ownsp yroperty located at 21 Van Buren Street, Iowa Cit Cooperative Society, y' Johnson County, Iowa, which is occupied by New Pioneer s , Inc. (New Pioneer); and WHEREAS, the building is located on the property line of Van Buren Street; and WHEREAS, New Pioneer wishes to install a 36" wide soffit on the building to pro- tect the public entranceway at the southwest corner of the building; and WHEREAS, installation of the soffit will require use of public right-of-way; and WHEREAS, the City is willing to allow such use of the right-of-way if it is pro- tected from liability which may result from such use, and can order removal of the soffit if the right-of-way is needed for any purpose; and WHEREAS, an Agreement for Use of Public Property containing such conditions is attached to this Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF IOWA CITY, IOWA, THAT: 1. The Mayor is authorized to sign and the City Clerk to attest the Agreement for Use of Public Property which is attached hereto. 2. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for use of the southerly nortion of the shall record building at 26 a greem nt n Buren Johnson County Iowa CitRecorder Ws OffGG or iice, Pio- and shall return file -stamped copies of the Agreement to the City Clerk and City Building Inspector. It was moved by Courtne Resolution be adop a an upon ro ca td seconded by Strait the AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: �— Ambrisco X Baker X Courtney _x — Dickson X McDonald Strait X Zuber Passed and approved this 30th day of June 1987. AYOR ATTEST: CITY LL��— Reeolvn' ABy a t 4'2i:arlmonf -T"... �z. 9�1to AGREEMENT FOR USE OF PUBLIC PROPERTY THIS AGREEMENT is made between GWG INVESTMENTS, an Iowa general partner— ship, hereinafter referred to as "Owner", NEW PIONEER COOPERATIVE SOCIETY, INC., hereinafter referred to as "Tenant", and the CITY OF IOWA CITY, IOWA, a muni— cipal corporation, herinafter referred to as "City", WHEREAS, GWG Investments is the owner of certain real estate located at 26 Van Buren Street, Iowa City, Johnson County, Iowa, and legally described as follows: Beginning at the northwest corner of the building, thence East 55 feet, thence South to the intersec— tion of the north line of Washington Street, thence West to the intersection of the east line of Van Buren Street, thence north to the point of beginning; and WHEREAS, Owner is leasing the entire premises including a one—story building on the above—described property to Tenant for business purposes; and WHEREAS, Owner and Tenant seek City approval to install a 36 inch wide soffit overhanging the public sidewalk at a height of 8 feet, 9 inches for a distance of II feet along the southernmost portion of the Van Buren Street side Of the building, said soffit to protect the public entryway at the southwest corner of the building, all as shown on the attached drawing labeled Exhibit corner and WHEREAS, a portion of the soffit will be located on City property as shown on Exhibit "A"; and WHEREAS, the City will agree to allow use of the property, but only sub— ject to the terms and conditions stated herein. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises set forth below, IT IS AGREED AS FOLLOWS: 1. Tenant will construct thesoffit adjacent to the property at 26 Van Buren Street, as shown Exhibit "A" the City specifications.. attached to this agreement according to 2. Tenant will be allowed to install this soffit on City property as shown on the attached Exhibit "A". Owner and Tenant acknowledge that no pro— perty right is conferred by this grant of permission, that the City is not empowered to grant a permanent use of its street right—of—way for private commercial purposes, and that the City may order the soffit removed at any time if, for any reason, the City Council determines that the property upon which the soffit is located should be cleared of obstruction. I .V' 3. The tenant in possession or, if none, Owner, shall maintain the .soffit in good repair according to City standards, and remove the soffit within thirty (30) days after being so ordered by the City. If the soffit is not timely removed after such order is issued, the City may remove it and the cost thereof shall be charged against the property in the manner pro- vided in Iowa Code (1987), Section 364.12(2)(e). Tenant agrees to indemnify Owner for such cost if Tenant is in possession at the time of removal. 4. Owner agrees to indemnify, defend and hold the City harmless in con- nection with any liability whatsoever arising in regard to the installation, maintenance, use and repair of said soffit. Tenant shall be required to carry liability insurance, in minimum amounts of $500,000/$1,000,000/$250,000 with contractual liability coverage included as part of such insurance, and shall furnish a copy of the policy to the City before installing the soffit. Owner or the tenant in possession shall thereafter maintain such insurance in force until the soffit is removed from the City property, and failure to maintain such insurance in force shall automatically terminate the grant of permission contained herein. The parties agree that the City may require reasonable increases in the amount of coverage in order to provide compar- able coverage protection in the future. If the required insurance is not maintained, the City shall have the right to remove the soffit following five (5) days prior written notice to the removal shall Owner of the property and the cos[ of Code (1987), Section tion 364.I2(2)(e). charged against the property in the manner provided in Iowa 5. This agreement shall constitute a covenant running with the land and shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the respective successors in interest and assigns of all parties. EXECUTED at Iowa City, Johnson County, Iowa, upon the dates as indi- cated below. 1 GWG INVESTMENTS DATED: Vve/E, -:"/l/g DATED: lulu 231, 1'g_ -1, ` By: �71UC X? ya4 c.•- ,Bruce K. Glasgow, Gener Partner NEW PIONEER COOPERATIVE SOCIETY, INC. Sh ron�Kilee ° Lake, President By: ary layer, ice rest ent CITY 0 IOWA CITY, Io A DATED: June 30, 1987 � �-A, tlltam J, Or'sCo, mayor ATTEST: QaMwtY: `} ; eaov; • By Tho ,`• ir,,' rtm•irl martan K. Knrr, City Clerk 4qb .P' r STATE OF IOWA ss. JOHNSON COUNTY ) On this dL day of I 1987, before me, a Notary Public, personally appeared Bruce R.. Glasgow, tome known to be the identical person named in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he executed the same as his voluntary act and deed. 109 WWEXPIRES r r 7,1989 STATE OF IOWA ) ) as. JOHNSON COUNTY ) Notary Public in and fait the State of Iowa On this a3p day of� 1987, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Iowa, personally appeared Sharon Killeen Lake and Hilary Strayer, to me personally known, who being by me duly sworn, did say that they are the President and Vice President respectively, of the corpora— tion executing the within and foregoing instrument to which this is attached, that no seal has been procured by the corporation, that said instrument was signed on behalf of the corporation by authority of its Board of Directors, and that Sharon Killeen Lake and Hilary Strayer as officers acknowledge the execution of the foregoing instrument to be the voluntary act and deed of the corporation, by it and by them voluntarily executed. Notary in and r—thee-State of Iowa STATE OF IOWA ) ) as. JOHNSON COUNTY ) On this �t"day of 1987, before me, a Notary Public, person— ally appeared William J. Am risco and Marian K. Karr, to me personally known, who being by me duly sworn , did as that they are the Mayor and the City Clerk, respectively, of said municipal corporation executing the within and foregoing instrument; that the said seal affixed thereto is the seal of said corporation; that said instrument was signed and sealed on behalf of said corporation, by authority of its Board of Directors; and that said William J. Ambrisco and Marian K. Karr as such officers acknowledge the execution of said instrument to be the voluntary act and deed of said corporation by it and by them voluntarily executed. Notary Public in ortthe State of Iowa 91llo Ij r I' , E� i P A NcpV Go--oP <--- VAO 5 w cv� � 4 --1 irs .v RESOLUTION N0, 87_163 RESOLUTION OF INTENT TO DISPOSE OF INTERESTS IN REAL ESTATE BY LEASES OF SPACE IN THE SENIOR CENTER FOR USES CONSISTENT WITH THE PURPOSES AND GOALS OF THE SENIOR CENTER MEALS PROGRAM, SEATS, VISITING NURSES ASSOCIATION OF RETIRED PERSONS AND ELDERLY SERVICESEgGEAMERICCONGREGATE TO SET A PUBLIC HEARING NCY ON THE PROPOSALS. ASSOCIATION, AMERICAN ? WHEREAS AND Of Johnse aon place for pPograms anderates activities Of to, among other things, w of Johnson County; and of interest to �' senior citizens and WHEREAS, Johnson County operates the Nutrition Program (Congre a and SEATS Program for the benefit of senior 4 citizens gate Meals) WHEREAS of the County; to the Viand the Elderlsiting Py Services gssocation, American Association of ar citizens; and gency, all conduct Retired Programs of interest � WHEREAS, the programs of 1� appropriately Johnson County and are conducted in space at the SenioreCenter7es WHEREAS, , and listed above h CnCouncil be l beneficial to all citizens that agencies tions oeach Pursuant to Lease Agreements allowed to use party. setting forth the pri rigace hts the Senior NOW, THEREFORE g and obllga_ THAT: BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF i 1• The Cit IOWA CITY, IOWA, ments foruseof hereby declares its intent Center enter gree - the pace at the Senior into Lease A }? Nurses Nutrition Program, Johnson Count with Johnson County for Nutrition the Elderly , the American y SEATS Program, the u y Services Agency. Association of Retired Persons, ersons, and y� Z• A public hearing an the City Clerk r hereby authorized, is set for July 1q notice of the Publichearin powered and directed' and the tive to the proposals g to be em - to P posals set forth aboveublished as provided b cause Y law rela- v F d r 1 i i f 9�f G4 It was moved by D' kson iand seconded by St-- the Resolution be adopted, and upon ro to there were: AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: X X AMBRISCO R BAKER R COURTNEY X DICKSON X MCDONALD STRAIT X ZUBER Passed and approved this 30th day of Jun— —e 1987.19 M 0 ATTEST: CI CLE K Rocu1va3 $ AFfmt,4 BY Tho LeNa! Ue odyn f7 9f47