The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1985-01-22 Correspondencea ."ity of Iowa City^' MEMORANDUM Date: January 16, 1985 To: City Council From: City Manager �—✓ Re: Police Department Procedures for Making Buys of Alcoholic Bever- ages Recently some Council members expressed concern about Police Department procedures for making buys of alcoholic beverages. The City Manager has reviewed the procedures with the Police Chief. The procedures, as detailed by the Police Chief in the enclosed memorandum and approved by the County Attorney, are appropriate and will be used periodically by the Police Department as a continuing effort to reduce the sale of alcoholic beverages to minors. Enclosure /sp /3/ City of Iowa City MEMORANDUM DATE: January 9, 1985 TO: Neal Berlin, City Manager FROM: Harvey D. Miller, Police Chief I RE: Procedures Por Making "Buys" of Alcoholic Beverages The Iowa City Police Department checks the purveyors of alcoholic beverages in three different ways. 1. Uniformed officers periodically check bars and establish- ments serving alcoholic beverages for those persons who obviously appear to be underage -see attached policy. i' 2. Plainclothes officers periodically check bars, on their own initiative and upon complaint, in the same manner as stated above - I 3. Once or twice a year we use young people as agents to attempt purchases in bars and stores that sell and/or sell and serve alcoholic beverages. The process works like this: a. The agents are minors; obviously underage by appear- ance. No attempt is made to alter the agent's appear- ance or to make them appear any older than they are. b. The agents are instructed: 1. To attempt to buy alcoholic beverages. . . but, if rebus—e sale or service, to not show any identification or make any insistence that they be allowed to buy. c. The agents are: 1. Accompanied by a plainclothes officer who maintains visual and/or audio monitoring of the attempt to purchase. 2. Instructed if a purchase is completed to immed- iately return the purchased alcoholic beverage to the plainclothes officer who immediately times; tags and marks the purchase as evidence., No attempt is made to coerce or persuade anyone to make a sale to the agents. Citations are issued or arrests made onl if a sale is absolutely consummated and the store clerk orW person has made the sale without requesting identification. No prior warning is given to any vendors of alcoholic beverages that 131 -z - attempts to buy will be made. The responsibility for training employees and supervising them in legal sales is the sellers and not the Police Departments. In the final analysis, nobody puts a gun to the head of the barkeep or vendor and orders them to make a sale. However, while the Police Department does not warn sellers of alcoholic beverages that we are contemplating making buys, we did obtain reprints of the State Code in regard to liquor laws and sent them to all permit holders. This was done in 1981, the last time a reprint was available. In addition, many times I have personally spoken with the management of several supermarkets and drinking establishments when complaints of underage pur- chases have been received from citizens. Some of these places include the east -side and north -side Hy -Vee Stores; Randalls; Eagles, north; the old Woodfields; the Airliner, and other es- tablishments. About a year and a half ago one of the Captains. . . I think it was John Ruppert, spoke with someone at John's Grocery about a reported violation. Finally, it should be pointed out that using underaged agents to attempt buys of alcoholic beverages is not unique to Iowa City but is a technique of enforcement used in many jurisdictions. Our technique and process of enforcement has been approved by the Johnson County Attorney, who is always informed prior to the Department undertaking these operations. Let me know if you need more on this. I i r GENERAL ORDER April :1, 1981 TO: Shift Captains and Detective Sup rvisor M FROM: Harvey D. Miller, Police Chief CCF U RE: Standardized Liquor Establishment Inspections The attached form will be used during the inspections of all establishments serving alcoholic beverages or beer in Iowa City. Inspections of all establishments of this nature will be made by the Detective Bureau or the day patrol shift prior to the issuance of any new or renewal liquor/beer license application and before approving any new or renewal application. 1. The format entitled "Liquor Establishment Investigation" will be adhered to. 2. Two officers will conduct each inspection. 3. Violations discovered by investigating officers will upon the first inspection be corrected forthwith or cit- ations issued if a failure to comply is evident. Sub- sequent inspections where violations are discovered will have citations issued by the inspecting officers. 4. If violations are discovered by the inspecting officers on first inspection, a follow-up inspection will be con- ducted by the same officers within four duty days follow- ing the initial inspection. If any violations are discover- ed during the follow-up inspection, citations will be issued by the inspecting officers. S. Completed inspection reports will be submitted forth- with following the inspection to the Office of the Police Chief. 6. Inspections of establishments serving alcoholic bever- ages or beer performed by officers of the afternoon or late night shift or by Detectives assigned to those hours may use as much of the report form as necessary. Night inspections should concentrate mainly upon underage sales and patrons as well as crowd capacity of the estab- lishment. However, upon citizen complaints in regard to the establishment the full format of inspection will be used regardless of the hour of inspection. 7. This order is effective immediately. Failure to adhere to this order and the established inspection format will result in disciplinary action. City of Iowa City MEMORANDUM DATE: April 22, 1951 TO: Owners; Managers; Bartenders of Liquor/Beer Sales Establishments FROM: Iowa City Police Department RE: Liquor Establishment Investigations As a method to standardize Liquor Establishment Investigations, the Iowa City Police Department will, as a matter of policy, use the attached format in investigating such establishments upon original or renewal applications for licenses and during non- scheduled investigations that will be made periodically on an unannounced basis from time to time. It will be the policy of the Police Department to conduct non- scheduled investigations of no less than two (2) to three (3) liquor/beer sales establishments each week. Owners, managers and bartenders of these establishments are advised to become familiar with Chapter 5 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Iowa Cit and the Iowa Beer and Liquor Coctntrol L�Tiapter 123, 1977) Co�f Iowa and tiecurrent rules andregula- tions of the Iowa Beer and Liquor Control Department, and to familiarize all employees of these provisions. 1. Applicants for original licenses must make proper application for the appropriate license at least twenty-one (21) days before the date on which the applicant desires the City Council to con- sider the application. (City Code, Sec. 5-25), 2. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant for a beer or liquor licenses renewal to obtain an appropriate license appli- cation from the City Clerk at least twenty-one (21) days before the date on which the applicant desires the City Council to con- sider the application. . . and . . . the applicant shall file the completed application with the City Clerk at least seven (7) days a ore the date on which the applicant desires the City Council to consider the application. (City Code, Sec. 5-34). In addition to the usual background and records check of appli- cants, the attached form will be the basis of premise and sales investigations by the Police Department for all original and renewal applications as well as subsequent periodic investigations. Your cooperation in these matters is solicited and greatly appreciated. This policy will become effective Monday, April 27, 1981. /3/ IOWA CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT LIQUOR ESTABLISHMENT INVESTIGATION REPORT Name of Establishment: License No.: Town: County: Beer Permit # B C Circle one Date: Time: a.m.m. Liquor License: A B C (Circle one Investigating Agency: Officer: CHAPTER LICENSE PROHIBITIONS ❑ 123.33 Unbroken emptied liquor bottles ❑ 123.49,1 Serving intoxicated persons, City Code 5-2 (1) ❑ 123.49,2 (a) Gambling violation (Refer to Chap. 725 6 99B/Ci Cade 5-2 (7) Immoral conduct on premises (Refer to Chap. 72 .1 6 8. ❑ 123.49,2 (b) Unlawful hours (Refer to Chap. 123.36/City Code 5-2 (2) ❑ 123.49,2 (c) Charge sales (except with bona fide credit card) Ci-tv Code rrir ❑ 123.49,2 (d) Unlawful containers (except wine or pre -mixed drinks) ❑ 123.49,2 (e) Reuse or refill original liquor bottles 123.49,2 (f) Employing minors to serve alcoholic beverage ❑ 123.49,2 (g) Personal liquor on licensed premises 123.49,2 (h) Selling or serving minors alcoholic beverage or beer (City Code 5-5) ❑ 123.49,2 (i.) Retail beer permittee allowing mixing or adding of alcohol to beer or other beverage on premises ❑ 123.49,2 (j) Knowingly permit/engage in any criminal activity on licensed premises ❑ 123.96 Untaxed liquor on licensed premises not bearing tax decal ❑ 123.141 Keeping liquor on beer permit premises 103 Two (2) unobstructed exits with swing out doors and lighted exit signs ❑ No violation observed during investigation ❑ Licensee and/or operator informed of investigation Enforcement Action Taken or Comments: (Use additional sheets if necessary) Policy, inspection authority, and enforcement power - Granted Code of Iowa - Chap, 123.1, 123.14, 123.30, 123.33, 123.112 - Chapter 80.25 (See City Code - Chapter 5 also) 131 9 L3CAL AUTHCr ITY REPORT AS LF APR. 13, 1981 ICaA CITY, IOWA PAGE 1 LIP N0. DATE D/B/A EFF OWNER ADDRESS ,.,. 2210 Uo/01/8J LCNG JOHN SILVER'S SECURITIES BUILDING C,:RPuRATIJN (SUNDAY) 1940 LOWER MUSCATINE ROAD 52240 ?? 2699 07/29/dJ THE BEST STEAK HJUSE MIHALOPOULCS, EILL GEORGE ISLNUAY1 1 SDLTH DUBUQUE 52240 !;3 ',941 CG/20/80 KEN'S PIZZA PARLOR KEN'S PIZZA PARLORS, INC. (SUNDAY) 1950 L,:WEP. MUSCATINE X7.240 3E 4929 04/07/81 10.%A CITY RACQUET CLUB E -J CORPOhATION, INC. (SUNDAY) I-80 C NCRTH DODGE STREET 52240 3B 5052 04/26/60 CONTROL TOI,ER FOUR CJSHIONS, INC. (SLNDAY) 18-20 SCUTH CLINTCN STREET 52240 L3 5770 JU/16/80 GODFATHER'S PIZZA T. 1. INVESTMENTS, INC. (SUNDAY) 53L HIGHWAY 41, (EST 52240 EB 606 02/i5/81 EL FRCNTERIZD ELIZCNDO, JOSE MARTIN (SLNDAY) 1200 SOUTH GILBERT CCURT (A) 52440 6B 0254 07/18/80 THE HOUSE OF SUBMARINES HCU5E CF SUBMARINES, INC., THE (SUNDAY) 12 SOUTH DUBUQUE STREET 52240 ,.., 7702 U1/31/60 THE SALAU BCi,L, INC. THE SALAD BOWL, INC. (SLNDAV) 701 C. DAVENPORT STREET 52240 PE 7939 11/10/8() PIZZA HUT PIZZA HUT OF AMERICA, INC. (SUNDAY) 1921 KECKUK ST. 52240 P� 7949 10/24/83 CANTON HOUSE CHAN, MICHAEL 0. L. (SUNDAY) 713-715 S. RIVERSIDE DRIVE 52240 LIC=;:je/PEKMIT PAGE 202 %3/ ' LGCAL AUTHORITY REPORT AS CF APR. 131 1581 ICWA CITY, 1CnA PAGE 2 L/P NU. JATE 0/a/A EFF OWNER ADDRESS BC 1062 01/14/81 RANOALL'S DISCOUNT FOODS RANDALL'S INTERNATIONAL, INC. (SUNDAY) 1851 LOWER MUSCATINE ROAD 52240 5C 1142 01/03/81 7 -ELEVEN STORE 1118048 SOUTHLAND CORPORATION, THE (SUNDAY) B20 FIRST AVENUE 52240 UL 1224 02/11/81 UUIK TRIP 9509 j 6JIK TRIP CORPORATION 5224C (SUNDAY) 225 SJUTH GILBERT ! I BC 126 02/01/81 SoATCN'S GASH L CARRY MARKET SEATON, CLYDE R. 52240 1331 MUSCATINE AVENUE cc J./LB/J1 IGEN STATIJNSTJRE TLE OIL CGRPCRAT ION KRAUSE.11044 47� (SUNDAY) 1104 SOLTH ;ILBERT 52240 O bl 1474 04/01/81 EAJLE i)ISCOUNT SUPER MARKET #157 LUCKY STORES, INC. (SUNDAY) 600 NDRTH OGDGE STREET 52240 UC :67L 07/J1/8U WALGREENWALGRLENSCOMPANY ISJNDAY) 1646 SYCAMORE - THE MALL CNT. 52240 aL 1796 C6/30/8J WHITEWAY SUPER MARKET MC RC, INC. 211 SOUTH CLINTON STREET 52240 °C 3089 Ja/04/80 JILL'S INTERSTATE 90 Dx KRON, WILLIAM BERNARD, JR. 52240 ISJNJAYI ROUTE 2 L 3234 08/2.3/83 JCHN'S GROCERY, INC. JOHN'S GROCERY, INC. 52240 (SUNDAY) 461 EAST MARKET •iL 235 Jant$/a0 OSLO ORUGrSINCE (SUNDAY) 201 S. CLINTON ST. 52242 %-W LICENSE/PERMIT PAGE 203 IY/ • LCCAL AUTHLRITY REPORT AS CF APm. L3, 1991 IOWA CITY, IOI+A PAGE 3 LIP NJ. DATE C/d/A EFF OnNER ACCRESS yC 3436 D9/Od/BO DISCCUNT DAN'S SHELL VOSS PETROLEUM COMPANY OF IOAA CITY, IOWA (SUNDAY) 933 S. CLINTON-BOX 127 52240 ,/ EL 3535 09/03/80 HY-VEE FCOD STORE N 1 C CRUG'TOWN Al HY-VEE FOOD STORES, INC. (SGNCAY) 501 HCLLYWCOD BOULEVARD 52240 3C 3632 09/07/30 HY-VEE FOOD STJRE # 2 HY-VEt FOOD STORES, INC.. (SLNDAY) 310 NCRTH 1ST AVENUE 5240 dC 3745 10/10/80 CUIK TRIP 0503 QUIK TRIP CORPORATICN (SUNDAY) 123 HEST BENT014 52240 Du 3994 10/15/30 WATT'S FOOD MARKET WATT, DALE E. 1603 MUSCATINE AVENUE 52240 EL 4230 11/27/90 CIVICEWO BONDED GAS GRUESKIN, EARL N. (PARTNER) (SUNDAY) 302 SOUTH DUBUQUE 52240 i)C 4304 11/11/80 DRUG FAIR 04 DRUG FAIR, INC. (SUNDAY) 2425 MUSCATINE AVENUE 52240 uL 5165 05/23/80 6AREC0 WARE C MC DONALD OIL CO. (SUNDAY) 928 SOUTH DUBUQUE 52240 2L 9.�2e 06/22/8u PESTLR CER5Y PESTER CERSY CIL COMPANY ISJNDAY) 606 SOUTH RIVERSIDE DRIVE 52240 ?(: 5831 11/06/E0 KIRK600C 76 INLAND TRANSPORT CO. ISUNDAY) 300 KIRKWOOD AVENUE 52240 cL 6304 07/12/8) 1ST AVENUE KERR-MC GEE f 0314 -JAY SERVICES, INC. (SUNDAY) 2229 idUSCATINE AVENUE 52240 LICC•iJSE/PERMIT. PAGE 204 �31iy :k a LOCAL Au Th CRI TY REPURT AS OF APi%- 13, 1901 IGAA CITY, IOWA PAGE 4 L/? NC. JA TE 0/B/A EFF OWNER ADDRESS L•L E351 J&/O6/80 NEEDS NEEDS, INC. 15 S. CLINTON 52242 EC 6769 02/15/61 HY-VEE FOOD STORE 43 & DRUGTOWN 42 HY-VEE FOOD STORE, INC. (SUNDAY) 1201 N. DODGE 52240 E:. 7019 03/23/81 CRUG FAIR, INC. DRUG FAIR, INC. 121 EAST WASHINGTON STKEE'T 5224C ;L 7700 USI/(;1/80 OUIK TRIP IF539 CUIK TRIP CORPORATION 52240 (SUNDAY) 301 MARKET / 9C 7844 O9/Cd/80 FAIRCHILD'S FAIRCHILD, C AYRES, WILLIAM H. E DAVID E. (SUNDAY) 105 E. BURLINGTON 52240 vC 6120 12/22/80 EAST -WEST ORIENTAL FOODS SHINN, INN HO 52240 615 IOWA AVE i,.4 ',UU2O 09/09/dJ BUSHNELL'S TURTLE BUSHNELL'S TURTLE, INC. 127 COLLEGE STREET 52240 LA 176 06/10/80 V. F. W., LE ROY E. WEEKES POST 93949 V. F. W., LE ROY E. ''AEEKEES POST Y3949 (SUNJAY) 609 FIGHWAY 436, BYPASS, EAST 52240 I.A 362 08/26/60 LOYAL ORDER OF MOOSE LEDGE 41096 LOYAL ORDER OF MOOSE LEDGE 41396 1SuND.IY) 2910 MUSLATINE AVENUE, BOX 26 52240 LA LL' 1252 09/09/80 THE HIGHLANDER INN E SUPPER CLUB HIGHLANDER, INC. 52240 (SUADAY) ROUTE 42 %EL LIChNSE/PERMIT PAGE 205 LOCAL AUTHORITY RF.PCRT AS OF APR. 13, 1961 IOWA CITY, IOWA PAGE '5 L/P Lt: No- DATE C/B/A EFF DWNER ADDf ESS L6 1340 06/17/80 HOWARD JOHNSON'S HOWAkO JCHNSCN COMPANY AND MCLCAN ENTERPRISES, INC (SUNDAY) NORTH DODGE STREET 52240 LL 1573 01/J6/81 THE SHAMROCK CORCORAN, RICHARD T. 525 SOUTH GILBERT 52240 Ll' :244 04/01/81 B. P. 0. ELKS #590 B. P. 0. ELKS 9590 (SUNDAY) 637 FCSTER ROAD 52240 LL 2725 06/01/80 THE AIRLINER ' SPAYER E CO., LTD. 7.2 SOUTH CLINTON 52240 LC 3315 U6/3U/d0 FOXHEAD TAVERN ALBERHASKY, DAVID L. 402 EAST MAkKET STREET 52240 LL 3316 07/03/80 AMERICAN LEGION, RJY L. CHGPEK POST #I7 AMERICAN LEGION, ROY L. LHOPEK POST #17 3016 MUSCATINE AVENUE 52240 IC 3322 D//J4/80 FRATERNAL ORDER OF EAGLES, IOWA CITY AERIE #695 FRATERNAL ORDER OF EAGLES, IOWA CITY AERIE #695 225 HWY 1, SOUTHEAST, BOX 507 52240 LL 2806 38/03/du TUCK'S PLACE TULKER, JAMES J. 210 NORTH LINN STREET 52240 LC 3607 08/33/6u VETcRANS OF FOREIGN WARS POST #2581 VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS POST #2581 1012 GILBERT COURT 52240 LC 4009 J5/JL/d0 JCE'S PLACE CAkOAN, INC. 115 ICnA AVENUE 52240 LC 472o 12/15/8U THE ANNEX FIRST AVENUE LOUNGE Cr- IOWA CITY, INC. 819 FIRST AVENUE 52240 LICENSE/PERMIT PAGE 206 a LCLAL AUIhOxI1Y REPORT AS CF APR. 13, 1921 IOWA CITY, 10hA PAGE 6 L/P NO. uATE C/B/A EFF CWNEk ADDRESS LC 1,754 12/16/80 WALT'S POGGENPGHL, WALTER G28 MAIOEN LANE 517.4) LC 5225 Ob/J1/8J CCLONIAL LANES PERSHELL CLRPORATIJN (SLNJAY) 2253 HIGHWAY 218 SOUTH 52240 LC `1337 06/30/80 THE MILL RESTAURANT DEMPSTER, KEITH W. (SUNDAY) 120 E. BURLINGTON 52140 LC b008 03/17/81 MAGOG'S MAGOG'S, INC. 206 NORTH LINN, BOX 506 52240 1C 6443 08102180 MAXWELL'S THE GREAT AMERICAN SALOON COMPANY 121 E. COLLEGE 52240 LC 0584 09/3U/80 THE BROWN BOTTLE I.C.B.B., LTD. (SUNDAY) 114 SOUTH CLINTON 52240 LL 6654 10/31/8U BART'S PLACE BARTFOLCMEW, RICHARD .)ACK 826 SOUTH CLINTON 52240 LL 1092 04/10/81 TOWNCREST INN, LTD. TOWNCREST INN, LTD. JOLT B ARTHUR STREET 52240 LC 7546 08/3U/80 PLAI4CR BOWLING, INC. PLAMCR BGWLING, INC. (SUNJAYI 1555 LST AVENUE 52240 LL 806J 03/31/81 GILBERT STREET TAP HANSEN, W. MARCUS 1134 GILBERT 52240 LC 6663 08/16/80 APPLEGATE'S LANDING IOWA RIVER PIZZA COMPANY (SUN JAY) 1411 SOUTH GILBERT 52240 NEo LILENSE/PERMIT PAGE 207 LOCAL AUTHORITY REPORT AS OF APk. 13, 1981 ICA,A CITY, IOVWA PAGE 7 I/P NO. i C/6/A EFF OWNER i i f LOCAL AUTHORITY REPORT AS OF APk. 13, 1981 ICA,A CITY, IOVWA PAGE 7 I/P NO. DATE C/6/A EFF OWNER ACDRESS LC 9&23 cc/OL/BU THAT DELI -THAT BAR BOULEVARD ROOM, LTD. 325 E MARKET ST. 52240 LC 9812 03/23/60 GEORGE'S BUFFET GEORGE'S BUFFET, INC. 312 MARKET STRLET 52240 LL 9906 03/18/81 SENOR PABLOS LTD. SENOR PAULCS LTD. 52240 (SUMUAY) B.,U FIRST AVENUE Ll. 10281 12/15/80 THE VINE RARICK, G O'BR1EN, JAY G TERRY 529 S. GILBERT STREET BOX 139152240 LC 10479 02/24/61 wOODFIELC'S AMBRCSE-LOVETINSKY, INC. 223 1/2 WASHINGTCN STREET 52240 LC LJ558 03/20/81 SHEEP'S HEAD CAFE SHEEP'S HEAD LTD. (SUNDAY) 209 N. LINN STREET 52240 LL 10575 03/22/81 GRINGO'S RUGGER -BURNS RESTAURANT, INC. (SUNDAY) 115 EAST COLLEGE STREET 52240 LL 10926 07/01/3u SYCAMORE EATING f DRINKING COMPANY DRINKING COMPANY SYCAMORE EATING E 1600 SYCAMORE, SYCAMCRE MALL 52240 LC 11570 J1/31/81 SMITH C COMPANY SMITH, LCRNA K. 52240 1210 HIGHLAND COURT 11917 05/19/80 MUMM'S SALCON E EATERY LC J. S. ML'MMEY, INC. 52240 21 w. BENTON LL 12136 08/01/81 THE FIELD FOUSE FIELD HOUSE INC. THE ill E. COLLEGE 52240 :. LICENSE/PEkM1T PAGE 2U8 H o. w I,hh ,.IC'If4iL/PEkMII PAGE 209 1� LOCAL AUTHCR17Y REPORT AS OF APR. 13, 1981 IOWA CITY, IOWA PAGE 8 L/P .NO. CATC D/B/A EFF OWNER ADDRESS LL 11280 09/21/8U DEADWOOD DEADWOOC INC. 6 SOUTH DUBUQUE ST. 52240 LC 12329 09/17/80 TIME OUT RESTAURANT C COACHES' CORNER LOUNGE BURCCN, INC. (SUNDAY) L220 HIGHWAY 6 WEST 52240 LC 12416 10/11/90 FELIX AND CSCARS ASK CO. (SUNDAY) 5 SOUTH DU8000E STREET 52240 LL 12566 12/v4/8U THE SANCTUARY RESTAURANT INC. LIMITED (SUNDAY) 405 SOUTH GILBERT 52240 LC L2630 12/21/80 YEN CHING RESTAURANT YEN CHING RESTAURANT, INC. (SUNDAY) 1515 MALL DRIVE 52240 LC 12773 02/06/81 THE CRGW'S NEST CROWS NEST, INC. 328 E. WASHINGTON 52240 LC 14950 03/2b/BO H C 0 TAP FRANTZ, DELIGHT B00 S. CUBUQUE ST. 52240 LC 13010 04/10/61 WILKE'S nILKE, CHRISTLPHEP. S. 122 WRIGHT STREET 52240 LC 13LOJ 05/01/80 HILL TCP LOUNGE HILL TCP COMPANY (SUNDAY) 1100 N. DODGE 52240 L: 11-230 06/28/80 COPPER COLLAR AND LOFT COPPER DOLLAR OF IOWA CITY,.INC. 211 IRNA AVE. EAST 52240 LC :3290 07/01/dU GABE'S EECH, INC. 330 E. WASHINGTCN 52240 I,hh ,.IC'If4iL/PEkMII PAGE 209 1� LOCAL AUTh_..ITY REPORT AS CF APP.. 13, .d31 IOWA CITY, IChA PAGE 9 L/P NO. DATE O/B/A EFF C%,NER ACORESS LC 13309 07/07/8) THE BREADLINE BREADBASKET CORPORATION (SUNDAY) 325 E. WASHINGTON 52240 ` LC 13494 08/27/80 THE ANT GA AND , MICHAEL B. C MARK A. l2 oIl T LT. 52240 Lf 13508 08/29/80 MICKY'S IOWA CITY MICKY`S LTC. 11 S. DUBUQUE 52240 I LC 13951 01/13/81 STUDIO 114 ENTERPRISES, INL. BOCK, WILLIAM A. JR. 114 %RIGHT STREET 52240 i LL 13978 01/30/81 ROSEBUD GRAND DADDY'S OF IOWA CITY, INC. 505 E. BURLINGTCN STREET 52240 LL 14190 03/26/81 GAS CO. INN MYERSr RICHARD L. C MARCENE 2300 MUSCATINE AVE. 52240 i LC 14125 04/13/dl SILVER SADDLE BURMEISTER, JAMES E. 1200 GILBERT CT. 52240 i t 14,239 U4/08/81 THE KITTY HAWK HANES, PAMELAA. 800 S. CUB UQUE 52240 a NEN LICENSc/PEkMIT PAGE 210 131 Criminal Office of the J.0 W. e..M, ooW n, M. MO., _ Johnson County Attorney 0.0dV.nlr0e.. Lind. , iKor L Chopua T 328 South Clinton Street • Post Office Boz 2450 • Iowa City. Iowa 52244 • (719)337.9688 Clvil-Juvenlle Mn. Letter , M." WWI nV M.C.IIum J. Patrick While County Attorney November 26, 1984 Child Support J.nlo. R. Mcc"I 1pSSSL]♦INS Ilarvoy Miller Fri Chief of Police t i Iowa City Police Department Civic Center L! 410 E. IVashington Street Iowa City, Iowa 52240 Ile: state V. Champion Dear Ham Enclosed for your background if you haven't yet seen it is a copy of the ruling in the Champion sale to minor case where the witness did not appear to testify. At this point, I have no specific disagreement with Tom's decision not to put the witness through trial; however, I feel very strongly that we need to take care to make sure that situation doesn't arise again. That should probably include one or more persons other than the officers or detectives conducting the investigation meeting and visiting with the prospective witness. Although pIagistratc Fowler chose to rule the tape recording inadmissible, I recommend continuation of that investigative technique in future cases. The admissibility in this case was substantially hampered by the absence of the witness to verify that the recording was true and ac- curate although, in my own opinion, it should have been admitted even in this instance. In addition, although tine court expressed doubt as to whether the right Code section was used, I have no doubt and strongly recommend continued use of section 123.49(2)(11). Use of that section is necessary to be able to invoke the license penalty which is vital to the enforcement eCl'ort and the magistrate I believe completely and erroneously fails to consider that section 123.50(3) envisions, about as clearly as a statute can be written, conviction of all employee. As you are aware, past charging practices haS been to use this section and I recommend its continued use, tiopistratc Fowler's ruling notwithstanding. /3/ a Harvey Miller November 26, 19311 Page 2 L To the extent you find yourse ves in Ai MFdiscussions regarding its use, please don't hesitate to refer people to me or invoke my name as supporting its continued use. As always, thanks for your assistance. Sin • •.ly, J. PATRICK wIIITE JOHNSON COUNTY ATTORNEY /kr Enclosure I /3/ City of Iowa City MEMORANDUM DATE: January 18, 1985 TO: City Council FROM: Dale Helling, Assistant City Manager RE: Coralville Milldam Hydroelectric Project Attached please find an outline of information which will be presented to Council at your informal meeting on January 22, 1985. Also attached is a copy of a letter from Mayor McDonald to Mayor Kattchee which addresses the current status of this project. Representatives from Shive-Hattery Engineers will make the presentation and will be available to answer questions you may have at the informal meeting. /31 CORALVILLE MILLDAM HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT FOR IOWA CITY, IOWA I. Now Can Iowa City Benefit from a Hydroelectric Plant in Coralville7 A. Hydroelectric generation is non-polluting, is in conformance with our National and State energy policies regarding development of our I renewable energy resources, and is an economical alternative to 1 curredt energy sources. B. 50 years or more of long-term stable electric rates for a major portion i of the City's electric use. Between 85 percent and 90 percent of the cost of production from a hydroelectric plant is for debt service on project financing. Debt service costs are stable and would end long before the end of the project life. II. Description of the Proposed Hydroelectric Plant i A. See attached preliminary Powerhouse Plan and Section drawing as used for the preliminary permit application B. Powerhouse - 64 feet wide, 65 feet long, 33 feet high, reinforced concrete construction C. Turbine/Generators - 5 each rated at 200 kW for a total rated output of 1,000 kW at a peak flow of 300 cubic feet per second per turbine D. Average annual output of 5,100,000 kWh E. Estimated cost in 1986 of $2,500,000 F. Estimated project life of more than 50 years G. All power generated would be used by the City as a credit toward electric use by the City at major facilities such as the wastewater treatment plant and water treatment plant (1983-1984 use was approximately 5,500,000 kWh per year). H. Estimated benefit/cost ratio over 30 years is 1.4/1.0 and over 50 years is 1.7/1.0 SHIVE•HATTERY ENGINEERS Page Two III. Project Scope and Preliminary Time Schedule A. Obtain Preliminary Permit - April or May 1985 B. Complete project feasibility studies - August 1985 C. Complete Federal Energy Regulatory Commission License Application - November 1985 D. Obtain License to Construct and Operate - June 1986 E. Obtain project construction financing - June 1986 F. Obtain site ownership or lease - June 1986 G. Project design, bidding, and construction - June 1986 - March 1988 H. Start generation of electricity - April 1988 I. Environmental studies, if required - June 1985 - April 1989 Note: Time schedules are highly variable and dependent upon regulatory agency actions. TMH/kje Respectfully submitted, SHIVE-HATTERY ENGINEERS Thomas M. Hayden, P.E. (,eE) January 16, 1985 SHIVE-HATTERY ENGINEERS /3.Z i I Page Two III. Project Scope and Preliminary Time Schedule A. Obtain Preliminary Permit - April or May 1985 B. Complete project feasibility studies - August 1985 C. Complete Federal Energy Regulatory Commission License Application - November 1985 D. Obtain License to Construct and Operate - June 1986 E. Obtain project construction financing - June 1986 F. Obtain site ownership or lease - June 1986 G. Project design, bidding, and construction - June 1986 - March 1988 H. Start generation of electricity - April 1988 I. Environmental studies, if required - June 1985 - April 1989 Note: Time schedules are highly variable and dependent upon regulatory agency actions. TMH/kje Respectfully submitted, SHIVE-HATTERY ENGINEERS Thomas M. Hayden, P.E. (,eE) January 16, 1985 SHIVE-HATTERY ENGINEERS /3.Z I CITY CSF IOW/-\ CITY CIVIC CENTER 410 E. WASFiNGTON ST. IOWA Cf1Y. IOWA 52240 (319)356-500D January 7, 1985 The Honorable Michael Kattchee, Mayor City of Coralville P.O. Box 5127 Coralville, Iowa 52241 Re: Coralville Milldam Nater Power Project Dear Mayor Kattchee: The purpose of this letter is to provide current information regarding the above -referenced project. I am aware that you previously have discussed this matter with the Assistant City Manager. The application for a preliminary permit for. this project was filed by Shive-Hattery Engineers, on behalf of the City of Iowa City, in October, 1984. This preliminary permit, if awarded to Iowa City, will allow us to conduct a feasibility study for this project. At the current time we are providing additional information for the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission which it has requested prior to processing our application. It is anticipated that our application will be accepted and notice will be published by the end of January 1985, which then would allow the Johnson County Conservation Board, owner of the facility, or any other interested party sixty days to file an exception challenging the issuance of the preliminary permit. The status of this entire project is in a very preliminary stage at this point. The City Council has neither discussed this project nor has it committed any funds for it. The application for a preliminary permit has been filed with the understanding that Shive-Hattery will provide further information for the Council regarding the scope of the project and the process toward licensing and development, including preliminary cost esti- mates. This discussion is tentatively scheduled for the informal City Council meeting at 6:30 PM on January 22, 1985. At that meeting, or shortly thereafter, I expect Council to make a decision whether or not to pursue this project further. If we do elect to proceed, the feasibility study will be completed as quickly as possible. If not, the City will withdraw its application for a preliminary permit immediately. 1'30�' Michael Kattchee January 7, 1985 Page 2 The City has requested that Shive-Hattery Engineers provide materials for Council review prior to the January 22 meeting. Copies of those materials will be forwarded to you on or about January 18. You are certainly welcome to attend the Council discussion and I would be pleased to entertain your comments during that discussion. I Please do not hesitate to contact me or the Assistant City Manager at any time if you have questions or desire further information. I i Si erely yours,� I yy { hn McDona,� ayor i I tp/sp cc: City Manager Assistant City Manager Thomas Hayden, Shive-Hattery Engineers i . Ity of Iowa City MEMORANDUM Date: January 17, 1985 To: City Council �� From: Karin Franklin, Senior Planne }� Re: Employment at Millard Warehouse According to Mr. Al Harwick, manager of Millard Warehouse in Iowa City, there are now 16 permanent, full-time employees at the warehouse as the result of completion of Phase I and Phase II. These are: Type Number Place of Residence Manager 1 North Liberty Office staff 3 Iowa City Shipping 8 receiving 8 Iowa City It 11 4 West Liberty Mr. Harwick also obtains temporary help from Manpower Services and averages employing about two persons per day for dock work. He is now accepting applications to hire two more permanent, full-time staff in shipping and receiving. Phase III is planned for this spring and will further increase the storage area. Additional staff will be hired for construction and approximately 2-4 employees are expected to be retained on a permanent basis as a result of the expansion. bj4/2 /33 i . Ity of Iowa City MEMORANDUM Date: January 17, 1985 To: City Council �� From: Karin Franklin, Senior Planne }� Re: Employment at Millard Warehouse According to Mr. Al Harwick, manager of Millard Warehouse in Iowa City, there are now 16 permanent, full-time employees at the warehouse as the result of completion of Phase I and Phase II. These are: Type Number Place of Residence Manager 1 North Liberty Office staff 3 Iowa City Shipping 8 receiving 8 Iowa City It 11 4 West Liberty Mr. Harwick also obtains temporary help from Manpower Services and averages employing about two persons per day for dock work. He is now accepting applications to hire two more permanent, full-time staff in shipping and receiving. Phase III is planned for this spring and will further increase the storage area. Additional staff will be hired for construction and approximately 2-4 employees are expected to be retained on a permanent basis as a result of the expansion. bj4/2 /33 .ity of Iowa City MEMORANDUM Date: January 18, 1985 To: City Council From: Karin Franklin, Senior Planner Re: Bristol Drive/Old Dubuque Road Intersection At the Council meeting of December 17, 1984, a request was presented on behalf of Dean Oakes for reconsideration of the Bristol Drive/Old Dubuque Road intersection. Members of the Council reiterated their concern that the road leading north from Old Dubuque Road, known as Foster Road, not become a beltway. The consensus of the Council was to look at possible alternatives to the wide radius turn option in which Foster Road flowed into Old Dubuque Road east of Bristol Drive. The staff was directed to meet with interested property owners in the area and to evaluate each of the alternatives for a future Council meeting. On January 11, 1985, the people listed at the end of this memo met with the staff to discuss the four alternatives presented to the Council. Property owners on either side of "Foster Road" expressed their desire to not lose significant portions of their property to road right-of-way. Residents.of Bristol Drive expressed concern regarding existing congestion of Bristol Drive and the desire to prevent increased traffic on their residential street. Mr. Oakes suggested alternative 15 which uses a typical T -intersection for "Foster Road", Old Dubuque Road and Bristol DPive but incorporates a median which prevents through traffic between Bristol and "Foster Road" and allows only right hand turns. Alternative A6 is an additional staff suggestion which has been reviewed by the Traffic Engineer, the Director of Public Works and the Planning staff. Evaluations of each of the alternatives in terms of cost to the City, present and future traffic flow, and the impact on existing properties are presented below. Costs are based on an assumed per acre land cost of $20,000, current paving costs of $100 per lineal foot of concrete for a 28 foot wide street (local), $110 per lineal foot of concrete for a 31 foot 'wide street (collector), and $25 per square yard for median or cul-de-sac construc- tion. Since Mr. Oakes may be able to purchase property to the west of the existing telephone easement lane, land costs include only that property which would need to be acquired from Dr. Kennedy, to the east of the lane. It is also assumed that Mr. Oakes will construct road 1" and dedicate it to the Pity with the City paying for the paving over 28 feet in width. All costs are estimates and are for comparison purposes only. 1,0- Ma Alternative B1 Cost: $206,600 The high cost of this alternative is attributable to the cost of improving Old Dubuque Road from the point at which the northerly road would join it to Highway 1 (c. $160,000). This easterly portion of Old Dubuque Road is presently unpaved. This design would provide easy access west and east so that Bristol Drive, although accessible, would not be the most attractive access point to Highway 1. This alternative has a significant impact on Dr. Kennedy's property by requiring the acquisition of nearly one acre of his property. Alternative 82 Cost: Approximately $28,600 Traffic flow from Road "X" to Bristol Drive would be impeded but not prevented by the jog. A vehicle traveling south on Road "X" on a trip west would be required to stop at Old Dubuque Road, turn right and accelerate before deciding to again turn left onto Bristol Drive. At some point Old Dubuque Road east of Bristol Drive may need improvement to discourage eastbound traffic from using the improved surface of Bristol Drive. Land acquisition from the property owner east of Road "X", Or. Kennedy, would be required. Property owners on Bristol Drive may experience more through traffic. Alternative M3 Cost: $25,800 Again as with Alternative R2, traffic flow from Road "X" to Bristol Drive would be impeded but not prevented by the jog. At some point Old Dubuque Road east of Bristol Drive may need improvement to discourage westbound traffic from using the improved surface of Bristol Drive. Land acquisi- tion from the property owner east of Road "X", Dr. Kennedy, would be required. However, less land would be necessary than that required for Alternative k2. Property owners on Bristol Drive may experience more through traffic. Alternative @4 Cost: $14,900 Traffic from Road "X" is more likely to flow directly to Highway 1 via Bristol Drive with this design than with any of the others. if further development to the north were to take place, traffic on Bristol Drive could increase significantly. 13X -3 - The impact on the properties to the east and west of the lane will be minimal compared to the other alternatives. However, the impact on the residences on Bristol Drive could potentially be significant if develop- ment beyond Mr. Oakes' proposed 22 dwelling units were to take place and if traffic chose Bristol Drive as the preferred route. Alternative 95 Cost: $15,125 A median has been suggested by Mr. Oakes as shown. This alternative would prevent traffic from flowing from Road "X" to Bristol Drive. Traffic on Old Dubuque Road would be restricted from any left hand turn movement at this intersection. In the future, if further development were to take place to the north, removal of the median would be recommended to handle the increase in traffic. Widening of Old Dubuque Road to accommodate the median would be necessary; this cost is not included in the total. In the short term, the impact of this design on Bristol Drive residents would be negligible. In the future, however, problems would no doubt arise if the median were to be removed after residents of Bristol Drive grew to depend upon its presence. Alternative #6 Cost: $34,900 Bristol Drive would handle only the residential traffic on the street. Through traffic from Road "X" or Old Dubuque Road would be impossible. Old Dubuque Road would handle all present and future traffic from Road "X" and would require improvement to the east at some point. No negative traffic impact should be felt by the residents of Bristol Drive. There would be only one access point to these residences; the cul-de-sac would extend approximately 1100 feet, 200 feet beyond the City's 900 foot limit. However, development of this area is almost complete and consists of 16 single family residences. Secondary access to Bristol Drive may not be necessary. The material presented to the Council is being forwarded to all residents of Bristol Drive and to the people listed below. cc: Dean Oakes Kay & Kent Ackerson, owners of property on N. Dubuque Road Dr. J. R. Kennedy, 1811 N. Dubuque Road Joey Braverman, 1425 Bristol Drive Nick Cilek, 1510 Bristol Drive /0 I %L ALTERNATIVE #Z -INTERSECTION AT N. DUBUQUE ROAD, 125' EAST OF BRISTOL DRIVE Li IL C:3 ALTERNATIVE kl-1001 INTERSECTEASTIOF ON ATN. DUBUQUE E ROAD BRIS70L 1 i ' I i t, 'ERNATIVE N4 INTERSECTION AT BRISTOL DRIVE u , Q J ` I a /3 f ik i ` i 1 i ' I i t, 'ERNATIVE N4 INTERSECTION AT BRISTOL DRIVE u , Q J ` I a /3 f ik 0 ` i i 1 1 i ' I i t, 'ERNATIVE N4 INTERSECTION AT BRISTOL DRIVE u , Q J ` I a /3 f ik 0 ` i i 1 i ' I i t, 'ERNATIVE N4 INTERSECTION AT BRISTOL DRIVE u , Q J ` I a /3 f ik QEF ERNATIVE #5 INTERSECTION AT BRISTOL DRIVE a- � a 13f4 1 4 CIO y . C3 C3 ALTERNATIVE #6 INTERSECTION AT BRISTOL DRIVE Q UI f OY Johnson Cou..y Council of Governmer 410 E. Wfasiijngicn St UAn City, b w 52240 rrrr oo MEMORANDUM January 15, 1985 TO: City CouncilofIowa City and Johnson County Board of Supervisors FROM: Cheryl Mintll ,ban Services Coordinator RE: FY86 Update and Highlights of Agency Requests As you know, your Joint Hearing Process Representativeswill be soliciting input from members of the City Council and the Board of Supervisors next week. The attached materials are provided I to summarize the presentations and materials from requesting i agencies and to provide various charts for improved analysis i and comparison of requests. j In preparing for your initial informal discussions, pages 2 through 14 of the FY86 Budget Request book, in your possession, will be helpful also. These pages contain charts of past allo- cations, FY86 requests, details of the Director's Salary Adjust- ment implementation plan, and a comparison of agency statistics FY83 to FY84. Of course, the rest of the book offers budget and program details which you may wish to refer to for clarifi- cation of questions. Items attached to aid your discussion include the following: Pages i FY86 Update and Highlights of Agency Requests. . . . . 1-18 Agency Income Sources as a % of Budget - FY84-86 . . . . .19-20 Local Sources as a % of Total Income by Agency - FY84-86 -Johnson County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .21-22 -Iowa City . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 -United Way . . . . . . . . . . .24-25 Agency Supplemental Requests for Johnson County's and United Way Salary Adjustments. . . . . . . . . 26 FY86 Agency Director's Benefit Point Count . . . . . 27 United Way Funding FY84, FY85, and FY86 Requests . . . 28 Revised City and County Request Charts . . . . . . . . . .29-30 Funding Body Comparison FY85-86 . . . . . . . . . . . . .31-32 At the end of next week, staff recommendations for funding will be provided for all members in the format as they will be sub- mitted to the representatives who will be formulating City/ County recommendations. 1 If you have questions or concerns or would like any additional information, please call me at 356-5242. Also attached are revised budgets for 4 -C's and the Domestic Violence Project. /3S a n FY86 UPDATE AND HIGHLIGHTS OF AGENCY REQUESTS Big Brothers/Big Sisters (BB/BS) Program Description The purpose of BB/BS is to provide opportunities for social, emotional, mental and physical development of children age six to 14 years from single parent families. This is accomplished from matches made with adult volun- teers in the community. Total annual matches were up 23.1% from FY83 to FY84 (from 147 to 181). FY86 Requests BB/BS is requesting $12,925 from United Way, $27,800 from Iowa City, and $15,000 from Johnson County. The total proposed budget is $89,000. New Items - One .5 FTE Caseworker @ $8,000. i - 4% salary increases for all staff. - 66% increase in benefits and taxes. This increase is due primarily to the addition of health and dental insurance for staff. - 89% increase in operating costs. This is due to payment of rent and i telephone which was previously in-kind support, $2,000 rent, $500 phone. - 150% increase for dues and memberships. ($2500) Community Coordinated Child Care (4 -C's) Program Description 4 -C's focuses on and responds to the needs of young children (ages birth to 6+ years), their parents and the professionals who provide child care. Programs include: child care information and referral service, child development education, child care food program and emergency child care. 4 -C's was recently awarded a Gannett Foundation Grant of $40,000 and will be developing a child care resource center for Johnson County. This grant is for one year only. FY86 Requests 4 -C's is requesting $7,860 from United Way, $7,000 from Iowa City, and $7,000 from Johnson County. The total budget is $126,374. 4 -C's is seeking an additional $2,512 from United Way for director's salary adjustment. New Items - Increase Coordinator position to 1.0 FTE @ $12,810. /3S - Increase in benefits and taxes commensurate with increase in Coordinator's position. - 11% increase in operating costs due mainly to increase in rent $4,400 (previously rent was in-kind). Community Mental Health Center (CMHC) Program Description CMHC' purpose is to furnish mental health care, promote mental health, attempt prevention of mental illness and provide other services consistent with these goals. This agency operates seven programs in Johnson County: outpatient, psychotherapy, consultation, student training, education, evaluation, day treatment and community support services. CMHC serves a three -county area: Johnson, Cedar and Iowa. FY86 Requests For Johnson County area, CMHC is requesting $386,833 from Johnson County Board of Supervisors. No funds are sought from Iowa City or United Way. $10,000 is also requested separately from the Johnson County State General allocation fund for the Day Treatment Program. Total budget for CMHC is $569,002. New Items (for Johnson County) - .75 FTE Secretary @ $10,440 for addition of psychiatric dictation. - 3.5% increase in unemployment compensation (1,8% to 5.3%). - 4% staff salary increases (1% for director). - 75% increase for professional consultation (due to increase salary cost for new psychiatric director). CRISIS CENTER Program Description Crisis Center is a suicide prevention and crisis intervention service which is available to anyone who calls or comes in. The Crisis Center provides short-term counseling, information aqd referral and emergency transportation. FY86 Requests Crisis Center is requesting $25,840 from United Way, $8,460 from Iowa City and $25,840 from Johnson County. In addition, Crisis Center is requesting $690 from Johnson County and $690 from United Way for director's salary adjustment. Iowa City has already allocated $339 for this purpose. 7 /3S a New Items - 6.5% increase in staff salaries. - Decrease in benefits and taxes due mainly to decrease in unemployment compensation. - Slight decrease in operating expenses. Crisis Center Food Bank and Emergency Assistance Program Program Description This program, which is part of the Crisis Center Intervention Program, but with its own coordinator, provides assistance through two programs. These include: the food bank program which gives Johnson County residents emer- gency and supplemental food; and the emergency assistance program which helps transients and local residents, on a one-time basis, with emergency needs such as transportation, lodging and prescription medication. FY86 Requests This year food bank requests are $12,645 from United Way, $8,737 from Iowa City and $9,498 from Johnson County. Total proposed budget for this program is $60,359. New Items - .5 FTE Clerical Assistant @ $4,160. - 6.5% increase in salary for Coordinator. - 8% decrease in benefits and taxes. - 28% increase in operating costs due primarily utilities payment, publicity, increase in telephone, and increase in food costs. Domestic Violence Project (DVP) Program Description DVP's purpose is to make comprehensive services available to those affected by domestic violence in the Johnson County/Iowa City area. Programs include: Safe Shelter - a residential facility for victims of battering and their children; Community Education - provides information about the issue of domestic violence; and Crisis Counseling - provides short-term counseling, advocacy and referrals for shelter residents, persons calling on the 24-hour phone line, and those wanting one-to-one counseling. FY86 Requests This year DVP is requesting $16,291 from United Way, $14,500 from Iowa City, and $19,500 from Johnson County. Total budget for this agency is $76,341. 3 /3S R Additionally, DVP is requesting $798 from Johnson County and $1,572 from United Way for the Director's salary adjustment. Iowa City has already allocated $970 for this purpose. New Items - 4.0% increase in Program Coordinator's salary salary adjustment not included in this percentage). - .5 FTE Facilities Coordinator @ $8,000. - 12% increase in Business Coordinator's salary. - 17% increase in Children's Coordinator salary. - 31% increase in benefits and taxes commensurate with increases in salary. - 9.3% increase in operating expenses. Elderly Services Agency (ESA) Proaram Description ESA offers three programs to Iowa City and Johnson County residents who are age 60 or older. These include: Information and Referral of service pertaining to the elderly; Outreach and Advocacy which seeks out elderly in need of services; and Chore and Respite Care which provides services enabling many elderly to maintain their own home. FY86 Requests ESA is requesting $27,836 from Iowa City, $12,000 from United Way and $1,500 from Johnson County. The total proposed budget is $76,341. Additionally, ESA is requesting $1,000 from Johnson County, and $1,134 from United Way for Director's salary adjustment. $2,484 has already been allocated by Iowa City for this purpose. New Items - 9.0% increase in operating costs. - 14% increase in salaries for staff (6.6% of this increase is accounted for by the IN clerk position being vacant for three months during FY83-84). - 28% in staff benefits and taxes. (Part of this % increase is due to the three months I&R clerk vacancy in FY83-84.) - $1,600 for staff development in order to develop a training program for choreworkers, volunteers involved in respite care and staff. 4 /3S I i R Additionally, DVP is requesting $798 from Johnson County and $1,572 from United Way for the Director's salary adjustment. Iowa City has already allocated $970 for this purpose. New Items - 4.0% increase in Program Coordinator's salary salary adjustment not included in this percentage). - .5 FTE Facilities Coordinator @ $8,000. - 12% increase in Business Coordinator's salary. - 17% increase in Children's Coordinator salary. - 31% increase in benefits and taxes commensurate with increases in salary. - 9.3% increase in operating expenses. Elderly Services Agency (ESA) Proaram Description ESA offers three programs to Iowa City and Johnson County residents who are age 60 or older. These include: Information and Referral of service pertaining to the elderly; Outreach and Advocacy which seeks out elderly in need of services; and Chore and Respite Care which provides services enabling many elderly to maintain their own home. FY86 Requests ESA is requesting $27,836 from Iowa City, $12,000 from United Way and $1,500 from Johnson County. The total proposed budget is $76,341. Additionally, ESA is requesting $1,000 from Johnson County, and $1,134 from United Way for Director's salary adjustment. $2,484 has already been allocated by Iowa City for this purpose. New Items - 9.0% increase in operating costs. - 14% increase in salaries for staff (6.6% of this increase is accounted for by the IN clerk position being vacant for three months during FY83-84). - 28% in staff benefits and taxes. (Part of this % increase is due to the three months I&R clerk vacancy in FY83-84.) - $1,600 for staff development in order to develop a training program for choreworkers, volunteers involved in respite care and staff. 4 /3S Handicare, Inc. Program Description Handicare is a licensed daycare/early childhood intervention center which offers specialized services to developmentally disabled/handicapped children (from infancy to six years) along with regular daycare services to non -handicapped children. Its uniqueness is due to being the only daycare in the state to integrate disabled/non-disabled children of this age group. Occupational and physical therapies are available for disabled children as well as coordination and referral with other community agencies. FY86 Requests This year Handicare, Inc. is requesting $10,400 from United Way and $3,000 from Iowa City. Total proposed budget (calendar year 1985 is $152,050. New Items - 33% increase in Director's salary. - 1 FTE accountant (previously .2 FTE) @ $16,000. - 40% increase in head teacher's salary. - $1,000 for professional consultation. By April 1985, Handicare, Inc. hopes to expand its program to serve 25 children, 12 disabled/handicapped, 12 non -handicapped. To accomplish this expansion, Handicare plans to expand staff and move its location. Expansion costs include: 1.75 FTE (2) Teachers Aide @ $13,820 5 FTE Therapist Aide @ $4,220 1 FTE Teacher/Therapist @ $11,440 .5 FTE Food Coordinator @ $4,160 .5 FTE Bus Driver* @ $6,240 36% increase in operating costs which covers existing operation costs but also expansion costs such as grounds and building expense, new rent and van expense, increased insurance costs, program supplies. *Purchase of a new van to transport handicapped children has been approved through COBB funds. Mayor's Youth Employment Program (MYEP) Program Description MYEP provides subsidized employment to youth who are financially, emotion- ally, educationally, physically or mentally disabled or handicapped. Employ- ment is provided through two programs: Iowa Grants Corps. In -School Compo- nent - an academic school year program for youth ages 14-19.5. Work experi- ence is through placement in public, private and non-profit sectors by E /3S- working 8-12/wk; Iowa Youth Corps. Summer Component - youth, between ages 15-18 participate in an 8 -week program designed to combine conservation education education and work experience (30 hrs. work/10 conservation). FY86 Requests MYEP is requesting $5,500 from United Way, $29,000 from Iowa City and $3,144 from Johnson County. Total budget is $76,901. i In addition, MYEP is requesting $333 from United Way and $124 from Johnson County for Director's salary adjustment. Iowa City has been allocated for this purpose, $2,484. New Items - Slight increase in operating expenses. - 6.8% increase in Director's salary. Mid -Eastern Council on Chemical Abuse (MECCA) Prooram Description - Maintenance MECCA is an agency which operates in Iowa, Cedar, and Washington counties, as well as Johnson County. The purpose and goal of MECCA is to provide the services necessary to habilitate those persons with substance abuse problems. Through education, prevention services and treatment, MECCA helps individuals find the way of a life of substance abuse and dependency. In addition, MECCA operates a half -way house/residential treatment facility, offers numerous workshops and consultation and referral services. FY86 Requests MECCA is requesting $3,000 from United Way, $10,000 from Iowa City and $103,000 from Johnson County. Total budget for MECCA for maintenance of its basic, on-going program is $418,474, New Items 3.4% decrease in Director's salary. - 4% average increase in staff salaries. - Increase Medical Director position to .14 FTE @ $10,454. (This increase is offset by increase in insurance payments for services.) - 23% increase in counseling position (this was previously a training position). - 3.9% increase in operating costs due primarily to increase in rent. 3 /3S MECCA - Short-term Acute Care Program (Social Detoxification and Acute Psychiatric Care) Program Description The short-term acute care unit would provide a calm, supportive, non -threat- ening atmosphere for those individuals who are experiencing alcohol or drug induced intoxication or withdrawal symptoms or individuals experiencing acute psychiatric difficulties and in need of medication adjustment. Trained staff would be available at the unit to provide support, client assessment and reality orientation. MECCA would work in concert with the Community Mental Health Center on those cases requiring medical supervision. Clients would remain at the unit for a minimum of 24 hours with an average 3-1 day stay anticipated. FY86 Requests For the Short-term Acute Care Program, MECCA is requesting $20,000 from United Way, $76,000 from Iowa City and $110,000 from Johnson County. The total budget for this program is $199,785. Summary of expansions for program: SALARIED POSITIONS SHORT-TERM ACUTE CARE FTE W/O FTE W/ TOTAL INTEGRATED REQUESTED POSITION "STAC" "STAC" "STAC" REDUCTION TOTAL MED DIRECTOR 0.20 0.40 12500 5220 7280 PHYSN. ASST. 0.00 1.00 22000 0 22000 (new) TECHNIC. (10) 3.70 10.00 115000 26000 89000 (6.3 FTE new) VH SUPERVIS 0.70 0.70 6707 6706 0 COOK 0.35 1.00 11000 5200 5800 SECRETARY 0.00 1.00 11000 0 11000 (new) SUB -TOTAL 4.95 14.10 178206 43126 135080 TAXES & BENE NA NA 39940 5665 34275 TOTAL 218145 48790 169355 Total cost for this program is $199,785. Cost of salaries and benefits is $169,355. Operating costs are $30,430. 7 /,3S i i Rape Victim Advocacy (RVAP) Program Description RVAP provides crises intervention, peer counseling, advocacy and information to victims of sexual abuse and their families and assists in the prevention of sexual abuse and harassment through public information programs. FY86 Requests RVAP is requesting $8,943.46 from United Way, $14,183 from Iowa City and $14,183 from Johnson County. Total budget is $56,300. In addition, RVAP is requesting $803 from Johnson County, $574 from United Way for the director's salary adjustment. Iowa City has allocated $803 for this purpose. New Items - Increase Assistant Coordinator to 1 FTE @ $14,000. i - 27% increase in Coordinator's salary due to salary adjustment. - 87% increase in benefits and taxes due to salary increase and addition of new position. - 9% increase in operating expenses (rent and utilities are provided by the University of Iowa). United Action for Youth (UAY) Program Description UAY consists of two programs - Outreach and Synthesis - which provides counseling, outreach, and creative arts opportunities for youth in Iowa City and Johnson County. Many of the youth services are alienated from tradi- tional youth services and UAY intervenes with at -risk youth who might otherwise become involved in juvenile delinquency. FY86 Requests This year UAY is requesting $15,000 from United Way, $39,365 from Iowa City, and $46,000 from Johnson County. The total proposed budget is $145,059. $92 has been allocated by Iowa City for the director's salary. No money is requested from United Way or Johnson County for this purpose. New Items - 1 FTE Outreach Counselor. a. - 10-15% salary increases for all staff (excluding director). 9 /3S - 3.6% in benefits and taxes. - 9.6% increase in operating costs. Willowcreek Neighborhood Center Program Description Willowcreek Neighborhood Center provides services to residents of Mark IV Apartments and residents of Johnson County. Programs include recreation, education and outreach, food and nutrition, emergency assistance, counseling and Southeast Asian outreach. FY86 Requests This year Willowcreek Neighborhood Center is requesting $20,000 from United Way, $9,400 from Iowa City and $2,600 from Johnson County. Total budget for the agency is $50,870. In addition, Willowcreek Neighborhood Center is asking $167 from Johnson County, and $1,541 from United Way for the director's salary adjustment. Iowa City has already allocated $686 for this purpose. Funds from Johnson County and United Way are reflected under income detail. New Items - 17% increase in director's salary which includes all salary adjustment funds. - .75 FTE Program Coordinator @ $7,864. - .25 FTE workstudy student (employer pays 80% of wages) @ $836. CWEP participant (.45t/hr.) @ $300. - $1,000 for professional consultation includes purchase of service of accountant for monthly and yearly agency accounting and budgeting. .7% decrease in overall operating expenses. 27% increase in benefits and taxes due mainly to health insurance costs for 1.75 FTE staff. i 9 135 NEW REQUEST - CITY Johnson County Chapter, American Red Cross Program Description Over 9000 people in Johnson County received the following Red Cross services last year: -Disaster Services: $8,666 in aid to victims of fires and tornados. -Child and Baby Courses: 133 young people taught. -Youth Health and Safety Awareness Education: 1,470 received. -Adult First Aid and Personal Safety Courses: 1,600 completed. -Swimming and Aquatics Safety Support; 1,353 general and handicapped population served. -Emergency Communication for Local Military Families: 210 people served. -Blood Collection: 1,710 units collected. I FY86 Request $19,250 is asked from United Way, $3,000 from Iowa City, and $4,000 from Johnson County. Total budget $67,127. $3,000 was received in FY84 from Iowa City, but no allocation was given in FY85 although $4,000 was requested. Salary Adjustment funds are also requested as recommended, $167 from Johnson County and $571 from United Way. Last year the Red Cross received $13,610 of the $19,250 they requested from United Way. It should be noted that the Red Cross relies heavily on their 250 volunteers and that they generate approximately half of their budget funds each year from sources other than local government and United Way. New Items -Recommended Director's salary adjustment (plus $2,292), plus accompanying benefit increases. Agency has low benefit points of 39.5, including only leave days. FY86 expenditures are projected to be a 5% decrease from FY85 expenditures even with salary adjustment. The majorecre3 ase is in a decreasing three year grant from the National Red Cross which is designed to phase out in FY87 and to encourage local funding phase in. Johnson County Red Cross has paid no local dues since 1977. Since 1980 $20,514 has been received from National Red Cross for direct aid to Johnson County disaster victims in addition to other national benefits such as course materials. HACAP (Hawkeye Area Community Action Program) Head Start i Program Description HACAP Head Start Day Care has received United Way funding for some time, but ( until this year the City and County funds have gone to the HACAP Neighborhood I Center. Due to the lack of adequate facilities to house combined services to children and families, the agency closed their Neighborhood Center on 6/30/84. The Center is being dismantled and staff reassigned to existing agency locations, i.e. 10 /3s 1. One worker to locate at the Elderly Service Agency, Senior Center to serve the elderly. 2. Work Fare worker to locate with JTPA, OHS, or General Assistance. 3. Non -elderly weatherization/fuel assistance program to operate out of seasonal office from 11/1-2/28 each year. Instead of requesting Neighborhood Center funding, HACAP is asking City and County support for their Head Start program, designed to give limited income children 3-5 years old, preschool education, family support, nutrition and health screening and services. Details of the two possible methods of continuing Head Start in Johnson County are detailed on page 168 of the FY86 Human Service Agency Funding Request book. 6,132 County residents (4,088 Iowa City residents) received Neighborhood Center and Head Start services last year. 75 children are now in the Head Start program. FY86 Request $19,179 is requested from United Way, $2,277 from Iowa City, and $4,554 from Johnson County. Total Johnson County budget $238,919. New Items Comparison is difficult since several options are being considered and reorganization is not yet completed. Also the HACAP Head Start and Neighbor- hood Center budgets are combined for the first time this year, making clear comparisons by program for prior years impossible without more budget details. -$9,000 increase in rent and utility costs. -Total budget is a 17% increase over last year, an increase of $35,521. $60,960 is added in new item: Reimbursement to Home Providers for decen- tralized daycare. -Salaries and benefits are decreased by $43,329. -$2,500 increase in education supplies. There is no program expansion in this budget. It includes consolidation of service into other existing agency locations. NEW REQUEST - CITY Independent Livin Program Description Independent Living is a client directed service designed to sup ort develop- mentally disabled adults so that they may live independently in the commu- nity. 60 members take part in business meetings and support groups. Kirkwood Community College Adult Basic Education Classes are offered at the Center in 11 135 Consumer Economics, Survival Skills, and Self -Esteem. Individualized tutoring related to GED, literacy, and high school courses is provided. In addition, advocacy and counseling are offered at the drop-in center. FY86 Request $16,720 is requested from United Way, $720 from Iowa City, and $3,120 from Johnson County. Last year was Independent Living's first year to receive County funding. They have not previously received City funding. $2,200 of the $22,075 budget is raised from contributions and special events. Director's salary adjustment is requested with $76 asked from Johnson County and $331 from United Way. Although the budget request includes increasing the Director from half to full-time, the salary proposed is $5,504 less than the recommended guideline for this position. New Items -Increase in Coordinator Position from half-time to full-time (salary increase from $7,396 to $11,894). -Increase Assistant Coordinator from one-fourth time to 40% FTE. -5% increase in total expenditures. -Director's Salary Adjustment - $407 in County and United Way funds. NEW REQUEST - CITY/COUNTY DHS TRANSFER Adult Day Program Program Description The Adult Day Program provided structured daytime programming for 40 elderly experiencing loss of physical and/or mental functioning last year. Program- ming takes place from 8 a.m. to 2 p.m. Tuesday through Friday in the Senio rr Center. 32 of the clients were low income, 8 private pay. Funds for this program are to subsidize the low income clients. Supportive counseling; recreational, physical, music, dance, and art thera- pies; socialization; skills of daily maintenance; excursions; and individual treatment plans combining health, social, and rehabilitative services are provided. Physical therapy is provided by a part-time Consultant. The overall purpose is to help keep the elderly in their homes and out of institutions such as nursing homes as long as possible and to provide care givers relief from giving 24 hour care and supervision. FY86 Requests No funds are requested from United Way. $1,500 is their first-time asking from Iowa City and $16,866 from Johnson County. This program has been funded through the Johnson County Department of Human Resources for several years. This is one of three agencies which is being transferred from the Johnson County Social Welfare Board process to the Joint Hearing Process this year. In addition to local sources, income is received from the Heritage Agency on Aging, client fees, and fund raising. 12 /3S New Items -10% salary adjustment and increase for full-time Director - increase in annual salary from $14,272 to $15,699, plus benefits. -Addition of half-time Program Assistant at $5,200 per year, plus pro rated benefit package. -$600 increase in materials, insurance, phone costs. -Overall budget increase of 29%, (plus $6,533). Increase is to allow expanded service to 7:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m., Monday through Friday and to increase enrollment. JOHNSON COUNTY ONLY REQUEST - COUNTY DHS TRANSFER RRC/JC (Association for Retarded Citizens - Johnson County) Program Description ARC/JC provides family support through respite and emergency care for retarded citizens and their families. Advocacy, legislative action, special events and community awareness programs are provided also. A new program component develops jobs for the trainable mentally retarded, places people in jobs, conducts training, and provides follow-up. ARC/JC provides a permanent facility for the Nelson Adult Center. ARC/JC serves citizens with spina bifida, cerebral palsy, autism, and hearing and vision impairments as well as the retarded. The program which Johnson County has funded for several years is the Systems Unlimited Summer Program. The Summer Program serves 31 children who are severe profound and trainable with eight weeks of structured programming. Classes are from 9 a.m. to 3 p.m., Monday through Friday and are conducted in the donated Iowa City Community School Buildings. Transportation, speech and occupational therapy, and educational consultation are provided from other sources. FY86 Requests $12,000 is requested from United Way, the same amount received last year. No request is made to Iowa City. Johnson County is asked for $16,000, the same amount budgeted last year although $12,511 was used. Recommended Director's salary adjustment funds are requested with $2,609 asked from United Way. New Items -Director's salary adjustment. Recommended half-time salary is $9,395. Program is asking increase from $6,600 to $7,794 fcr half-time Director plus employee taxes. -$875 increase in cost for audit ($1,000) -Modest increases in phone, materials, and building repair costs. -Income raised for Summer Program by ARC/JC remains stable at $3,000. 13 COUNTY DHS TRANSFER Lutheran Social Services of Southeast Iowa Program Description Lutheran Social Services provides family counseling to families and individu- als seeking assistance in resolving emotional problems of temporary stresses. 1,423 case hours of service were provided last year. The program funded since 1978 by Johnson County through DHS is their Expec- tant Single Parent Program (ESP). ESP provides case work counseling service to expectant single parents forced with the issues of pregnancy, parenthood, physical care arrangements, adoption, family and other significant relation- ships. 49 single parents received assistance last year with 783 hours of service. The ESP seeks to prevent child abuse, provide good prenatal care, and postnlocal hospitals. verge planning. a 35% of g20mreferrals came to 21 years of age. DHS and 13% from hospt ls FY86 Requests $12,500 is requested from United Way, no request from Iowa City, and $13,436 from Johnson County. New Items -Hours of service remain the same - projected at 780 hours of service for the year. -The cost per program hour has been increased by 991 or 5%, from $19.68 per hour to $20.67 per hour. Youth Homes, Inc. Program Description Youth Homes, Inc. currently operates three programs: 1. Shelter Care - short-term emergency residential care for youth and services to assist return to home and maintenance in home. 2. Group Home Services - long-term residential care and multiple social services for children living outside of their homes. 3 indapartmentsiinnthe IowasCitygto aid area - must be DHS clientslescents to ve independently i Although Youth Homes has received a small grant from Johnson County ($5,000) for several years, this past year they requested mid -year emergency assis- tance to develop a shelter care program and received $27,708 from the county. This reuest ram to close RonaldsgHouse cGroup Home. I was thenn nreopened as ncidets which r Youth Eced the mergency t encyShelter 14 /3S N (YES) providing temporary care for six adolescents who are placed for a maximum of 30 days. County funds are being requested to cover emergency shelter costs not covered by contracts from OHS. 36 youth were served by Youth Homes last year and 366 units of service were provided to Johnson County residents out of the total of 3,607 units provided by Youth Homes. One unit is one day residential service and one hour counseling for independent living. FY86 Request No funds are requested from United Way or the City of Iowa City. Youth Homes is a United Way designated giving agency, receiving only designated funds. $54,600 is requested from Johnson County. New Items Nine positions were eliminated in 1984, comparisons are difficult between 1985 and 1985 due to program restructuring. - Salary increases of 6% for all continuing staff. - Nine positions added in 1984, total salaries increased 5% over 1983. - Total expenditures 5% increase over 1983. - Increases in staff development, dues, rent, utilities, equipment purchase and rental, local transportation, and rental upkeep. 15 /3S CAHHSA (Community and Home Health Service Agency/the Visiting Nurse Associa- tion) Program Description: CAHHSA provides the following programs with the overall goal of improving the health status of residents of Johnson County: 1. Skilled Home Care - Home visits by RN, Physical Therapists, Occupational Therapists, Speech Pathologists, Social Worker, and Home Health Aides. 2. Health Promotion/Maternal Child Health - Home visits by RN, PT, and Social Worker. 3. Eldercare - Health prevention and promotion at nine sites in County. Includes flu shots, foot clinics, health screening and education. 4. Child Health Clinic - Health screening, counseling, referral, immuniza- tion, and developmental assessments of children birth through 16 years. 5. Community Programs - Health counseling, screening, and education to general community and employee groups. 18,272 visits were made in 1984, serving 1,638 individuals. CAHHSA also acontrac provides foraskilledmservices withIowa infant piceoan programs as well as FY86 Request: last as amot CAHHSA is ted Way requesting free ca550 dre United for skill d home patients. received indi- catesUnited Way cotes that in 1984 the agency provided approximately $75,000 of free an subsidized skilled care. The Johnson County request is the same as that received last year,These funds are $112,35rm 0. ed for programs 2 Description above. The kagency statthrough es that iti spaid for servicesh onpaounit basis for each service provided. New Items: - Decrease of $25,000 in Medicare and Medicaid reimbursements over 1984. - Decrease of $2,000 in Blue Cross Insurance from 1984. - Increase of $1,500 in contributions. - $4,000 in interest income maintained. - Five percent increases in all staff salaries. of o - Transfer ofDepartment 7/1/84 rincrreasesrtotal salary ector olevel byl$14,500cin 1985. Health paid are provided by the Health Department. Contract services and Health Aide withrvices Health oDepartmeved ntalaAmounries t budgeted $5,000 more than 1983, $22,000 more than 1984. - Weekend Nurse costs decreased $10,000. - $4,500 increase in Professional Services. 16 135' IOWA CITY FREE MEDICAL CLINIC Program Description: The Iowa City Free Medical Clinic offers a wide range of health services at no cost to patients. Through clinic, lab, pharmacy and social services, they seek to reach those who do not have access to health care for financial reasons or due to concerns about confidentiality. The clinic is open for care Monday and Thursday evenings. Last year a Medication and Medical Supply Fund was established for Johnson County residents unable to afford prescription medication, over-the-counter medications, and 1984. There was aetotal of supplies.dical 2,596 patiente0visitseinle f 1984, with 4h587uunits of service provided. FY86 Requests: $38,867 is requested from United Way, no request from Iowa City and $34,408 asked from Johnson County. Funds requested for Director's salary adjustment include $5,474 from Johnson County and $6,287 from United Way, as on chart page 8 of the Budget Request book. Page 203 of program budget is incorrect for this item. New Items: - Co -Director Salary Adjustments, moving salaries of three co -Directors from $11,297 to $15,219, an increase of $3,922 per person plus FICA. - Addition of one-fourth time Medical Technologist at $2,800 per year to offset shortage of lab volunteers. - Other operating costs are increased by 7.5%. 17 135, New Request - County LEGAL SERVICES CORPORATION OF IOWA Program Description: Legal Services Corporation of Iowa provides legal assistance to low-income residents of a seven county area in Iowa (Des Moines, Henry, Johnson, Lee, Louisa, Muscatine, and Washington counties). Last year they provided 952 units of service to 739 residents of Johnson County. Free legal help is provided to individuals with problems such as: domestic abuse, public benefit difficulties, housing (evictions, utility shut -offs, discrimination), consumer law (repossessions, illegal garnishments, unlawful collection), employment law (improper denial of unemployment benefits, job descriptions), and institutional (unlawful procedures regarding nursing home patients, disputes with conservators). Legal Services provides educational programs in order for the low-income to advocate for themselves. They also recruit volunteer time from the private bar. Federal cuts in 1982 closed five of the 15 Iowa Legal Services offices. LSCI's goal is to have 2 legal advocates for 10,000 low-income persons. Currently with 4.9 advocates for 37,747 low-income in their district, the ratio is two advocates per 15,407 low-income persons. The United Way and Johnson County funds would allow an increase to 5.3 advocates, or two per 14,244 low-income persons. They estimate that over one-third of their requests for service come from Johnson County residents and they feel additional staff is needed to meet this demand. FY86 Requests: United Way is asked to fund $15,000 for LSCI next year and Johnson County $5,000. The Johnson County funds and United Way fund increase ($7,750 was received last year) are requested to move the three-fifths time person now funded by United Way to full-time and to provide that person's benefits. New Items: - Increasing three-fifths time staff attorney to full-time plus benefits, $9,201 to $16,200. - Salary increases ranging from 3.76% to 9.23%, total increase of 22% plus 19845decreasings 0 benefits. salary costs for that yearositions re nfilled a portion fthe - Operating costs other salaries increased 7.5%, $4,661. 3.5— BB/ CAH Cor Her Hee Foe Cr' OVF ESI 4-I HAI Hai Im Li Fr Me HUMAN SERVICE ^ =NCY INCOME SOURCES AS A OF F--'IET FY84-86 N C • N O T d O C c u a u u o>. o i •m mm �u NN d O1V L +J NT Red Cross FY34 .6 N 4 •N C IFY86 O � 111: 72 1 a.51 6.012E .71 3.01 3.7110.4118.5 r - 1.0 V-.•.• J FY94- N c 4.7 _ 95.3 a a U O 100 I- 1 Ne.l W dV L r.J N+ 100 FY86 12.1 6.2 - 91.21-0 0.5 - O 00 C O O 6> q U Other MYEP FY84 24 6 270 Red Cross FY34 .6 33.41 4 IFY86 111: 72 1 a.51 6.012E .71 3.01 3.7110.4118.5 13.8120.41 1.0 10091 Legal Sery FY94- 4.7 - 95.3 - 100 I- 1 11 100 FY86 12.1 6.2 - 91.21-0 0.5 - 100 MYEP FY84 24 6 270 ? I 2ls 10.4 1 100 IFY86 FY85 34.11 2.6 6.51 2.1 35.7 1 0.0 - 15.415c3.34.1 100 37.71 4.31 7.61 2.3 43.51 - 0.6 - 3.6 0.4 100 CDC Co" MECCA FY84 FY85 - - 12.2 36.2 25.3 34.1 - - 3.7 0.2 0.1 0.3 37.61 64.5 40.9 0.4 0.3 0.1 - - - 10.71 8.9 7.9 6.91 - - 6.5 1.5 - 0.9 - 0.7 100 100 99.9 Mainten- FY86 ance FY86 2.4 24.3 0.7 0.5 60.2 0.1 - 10.8 - - 1.0 100 Acute Care FY86 133.0155.!110.01- - 1.9 - - 100 RVAP IFYE6 FY84 FY85 24.6 25.8125.8 26.3126.8 24.6 13.8 1E.51- 17.4111 3.6 - 1 - 3.5 2.11 - 1 119.21 27.1 6.3 5.9 4.2 I 99.9 100.1 OAY FY84 FY85 FY86 336 30.4130.4 .3 12:. 33.6 32.0 L0.6� 8.91 110.4 1 0.61,16.5 0.5124.5 0.5 17.0 1.3 1.61 2.1 0.1 0.8 1.0 - - OHS 1.21 1.41 I 3.8 1.7 8.3 I 100.1 100 100 w- creuilloek FY84 FY85 FY86 13.5 21.1 19.91 - 4.7 5.8 30.3 43.2 45.5 - - 1.1 54.0 27.3 20.5 0.2 0.4 0.4 1.1 2.3 2.1 - - - 0.9 1.0 4.7 100 100 100 Youth Hones FY84 FY85 FY86 - 1.7 11.1 17.3 - - - - 5.3 24.4 0.4 0.5 0.4 - - - 97.4 83.0 57.7 0.4 0.1 0.2i 99.9 100 100 Adult Oay FY84 IFFYSS Y86 5.2158.51- 64.1 4.21 1.7117.31- 1 1.7 117.8 15.51 15.6 1 1 11000 100 ARC/JC FY84 FY85 IFY86 _121.11 31.1 6.2 14.6 2.51101.5 0.7 1.9 71.0 - 1.9 0.1 0.6 7.4 3.6 5.1 - IRen,,l 52.01 17.1 43.8 4.5 1.3 2.9 99.9 100 99.9 Goodwill 1FYR4 FYES FY86 1- 1- 12 41 2.2 2.2 - - 10.41 1.9 1.9 0.5 0.4 0.31 0.2 0.2 0.3 Mac 23.7 235 23:6155.91 rias OHS 57.3 14.3 1.1 57.11 13.5 1.1 13.1 2.6 99.9 99.9 99.9 Hillcrest FY -.4 FYSS IFY86 I- 150.8 53.9 183.3 - - I- I 149.01- 44.91 113.41- 0.2 1.3 - I- - 1- 1 1 I 1 3.31 100 100 100 Lutheran 100 S.S. IFY84 fY96 1_ 1 0.41 0.30.3 0.4 0.3 0.31- - 65.7122.9 .6 162 6, ^ 23.0 2-3.,u - 7.3 1 8.21 7.4 2.51 6.41 6.5i 99.9 100 k JOHNSON COUNTY FUNDING AS A PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL AGENCY FUNDING ACTUAL i J i FY84 JOHNSON COUNTY FUNDING AS A PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL AGENCY FUNDING ACTUAL REQUEST FISCAL YEAR AGENCIES FY84 FY85 FY86 1. Big Brothers/Big Sisters 13.0 (8000/61,718) 16.5 (10,800/65,501) 17.4 (15,000/86,000) 2. Comm. Mental Health 62.9 (312,489/496,512) 66.9 (319,159/476,729) 68.3 (386,833/566,104) 3. Food Bank 8 Emerg. Asst. 15.7 (7843/50,007.53) 18.2 (8635/47,457) 15.7 (9498/60,359) 4. Crisis Center 35.0 (22,000/62,804) 37.7 (24,262/64,361) 36.3 (25,840/71,152) 5. DVP 13.6 (6600/48,475) 14.1 (7800/55,419) 25.5 (19,500/76,341) 6. ESA 0 - 0 - 2.1 (1500/71,744) *7. HACAP (4,175/575,793) (4,175/583,378) 1.9 (4554/238,919) 8. Independent Living 14.0 (2400/17,150) 15.0 (2760/18,416) 15.4 (3744/24,308) 9. Red Cross/JC 5.(36000/53,234) (4,000/67,090) (4,000/67,124) 10. MYEP 2.0 (2,000/100,892) 2.6 (2,200/85,156) 4.3 (3,286,76,901) 11. MECCA - both programs (Maintenance only) 36.2(95,000/262,244) 36.2 25.3 25.3(103,000/407,130) 34.1 24.3(103 000/423,943) (Acute care only) - ' 55.1(110,000/199,785) 12. RVAP 24.6 (8969/36,394.19) 25.8 (9865/38,190) 26.8 (15,016/56,111.40)** **Includes salaries for full-time coordinator and part-time assistant coordinator. 13. UAY 33.6 (35,500/105,768) 30.4 (37,500/123,562) 32.0 (46,000/143,965) 14. Willowcreek 0 _ 4.7 (2,000/42,808) 5.8 (2,767/47,346) 15. Adult Day Program 64.1 (10,800/16,849) 64.2 (14,500/22,594) 58.5 (16,899/28,899) 16. Lutheran Social Service 0.4 (12,506/3,424,709) 0.3 0.4 (12,400/3,582,000) (13,200/3,684,000) *FY84-85 - Neighborhood Center, FY86 - Hea21Start. i Johnson County 17. Hillcrest Family Serv. 0 0 7.5 - - (15,000/198,074) CALENDAR YEAR AGENCIES 1. CAHHSA/VNA 26.1 24.6 26.4 (125,080/478,437) (133,825/544,325) (138,000/523,550) 2. 4 -C's 0 0 1.9 - - (3071/161,142) 3. Free Med. Clinic 43.1 44.6 45.8 (25,670/59,585) (29,753/66,687) (39,130/85,380) 4. Legal Services 0 0 2.1 - - (5,000/241,588) 5. Youth Homes 1.7 11.1 17.3 (5,000/300,129) (26,602/239,562) (54,469/314,032) 6. ARC/JC 20.1* 13.9* 19.5 (11,791/71,064) (12,511/89,923) (16,000 /82,100) *If funds had passed through ARC in those years. i i 22 N I IOWA CITY FUNDING *FY84-85 - Neighborhood Center, FY86 - Head Start. 23 AS A PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL AGENCY FUNDING ACTUAL REQUEST FISCAL YEAR AGENCIES FY84 FY85 FY86 1. Big Brothers/Big Sisters (19,910/61,718) (21,901/65,501) (27,800/86,000) 2. Crisis Center Food Bank 15.7 (7843/50,007.53) 16.7 (7943/47,457) 14.5 (8737/60,359) 3. Crisis Center 11.5 (7220/62,804) 12.3 (7942/64,361) 11.9 (8,460/71,152) 4. DVP 17.0 (8250/48,475) 17.1 (9450/55,419) 19.0 (14,500/76,341) 5. ESA 43.7 (25,850/59,199) 42.7 (27,159/63,625) 38.8 (27,836/71,744) 3 3 1.0 *6. HACAP (2,000/575,793) (2,000/583,378) (2,277/238,919) 7. Independent Living 0 - 2.0 (360/18,416) 3.6 (864/24,308) 8. Red Cross/JC 5.6 (3000/53,234) 0 - 4.5 (3000/67,124) 9. MYEP 24.6 (25,000/100,892) 34.1 (29,076/85,156) 37.7 (29,000/76,901) 10. MECCA - both programs 0 0 - 12.2 2.4 (10,000/423,943) (Maintenance only) - 33.0 (66,000/199,785) (Acute care only) - 11. RVAP 24.6 (8969/36,394.19) 25.8 (9865/38,190) 26.8 (15016.99/56,111.40)** **Includes salaries for full-time coordinator and part-time assistance coordinator. 12. UAY 33.6 (35,500/105,768) 30.4 (37,592/123,552) 27.3 (39,365/143,965) 13. Willowcreek 13.5 (7570/56,253) 21.1 (9023/42,808) 19.9 (9400/47,346) CALENDAR YEAR AGENCIES FY84 FY85 FY86 0 0 1.9- 14. 4 -C's _ (3071/161,142) 0 0 1.3- 15. Handicare _ (2000/152,560) *FY84-85 - Neighborhood Center, FY86 - Head Start. 23 UNITED HAY FUNDING AS A PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL AGENCY FUNDING ACTUAL REQUEST CALENDAR YEAR AGENCIES FY84 FY85 FY86 1. CAHHSA/VNA 9.5 (45,490/478,437) 8.58.9 (46,000/544,325) (46,550/523,550) 2. 4 -C's 5.8 (6000/103,456) 6.8 (6414/94,205) 59285/161,142) 3. Free Medical Clinic 53.6 (31,953/59,585) 52.4 (3,919/66,687) 51.5 44,000/85,380) 4. ARC/JC 21.1 (12,500/59,272.71) 16.7 (12,966/77,412) 14.6 12,000/82,100) 5. Goodwill 2.4 (36,554/1,494,235) 2.2 (36,303/1,628,944) 2.2 (38,200/1,727,500 t 6. Handicare p - 1.0 (761/72,885) 7.8 (11,900/152,560) 7. Legal Services 4.7 (9000/193,329) 4.7 (9000/192,627) 6.2 (15,000/241,588) FISCAL YEAR AGENCIES 8. Big Brothers/Big Sisters 17.1 (10,582/61,718) 16.8 (11,000/65,501) 16.2 (13,900/86,000) 9. Crisis Center Food Bank 21.4 (10,708/50,007.53) 24.2 (11,500/47,457) 20.9 (12,645/60,359) i 10. Crisis Center 36.9 (23,161/62,804) 37.1 (23,857/64,361) 36.3 (25,840/71,152) 11. OVP 23.7 (11,498/48,475) 24.9 (13,823/55,419) 21.3 (16,291/76,341) 12. ESA 16,9 (10,002/59,199) 15.7 (10,000/63,625) 14.6 (10,500/71,744) 1 3. HACAP 10.4 (16,300/156,595) 8.2 (16,640/203,397) 8.0 (19,179/238,919) °79.3 14. Independent Living (13,607/17,150) 75.2 (13,856/18,416) 72.0 (17,500/24,308) 1 15. Red Cross/JC 33.4 (17,800/53,234) 21.8 (14,617/67,090) 28.7 19,250/67,124) 16. MYEP 5.3 (5297/100,892) 6.5 (5500/85,156) 7.6 (5833/76,901) 24 /3S 1 1 MECCA (both I .. 1 I 1. 1 � i (Maintenance only) (Acute care United Way 17. MECCA (both programs) 0 0 (Maintenance only) (Acute care only) 18. RVAP 13.8 18.5 (5026.99/36,394.19) (7054/38,190) 19. UAY 10.6 8.9 (11,256/105,768) (11,000/123,552) 20. Willowcreek 43.2 (17,066/563253) (18,485/42,808) of I,fk.... cnr Cury n.3 0.3 3.7 0.7(3000/423,943) 10.0(20,000/199,785) 17.4 (9777/42/56,111.40) 10.4 (15,000/143,965) 45.5 (21,541/47,346) 0.3 a 26 SALARY ADJUSTMENTS CITY ALLOCATIONS. COUNTY 8 UNITED WAY REQUESTS - FY86 Agency City County United Way Other Total ARC $ - - $ - - $ 2,609 $ 1,206 $ 3,815 Crisis Center 339 690 690 435 2,154 Domestic Violence 970 798 1,572 - - 3,340 ESA 2,484 - - 1,134 2,198 5,816 4 C's - - - - 2,512 - - 2,512 Free Medical (3) - 5,474 6,287 191 11,952 Handicare - - - - - 2,292 2'292 Independent Living - - 76 331 292 699 Mark IV 696 167 1,541 1,888 4,292 Mayor's Youth 1,576 124 333 2,399 4,432 Red Cross - 167 571 1,554 2,292 RVAP 803 803 574 2,112 4,292 UAY 92 - - - - - 92 Total $6,960 $8,299 $18,154 $12,275 $47,980 26 FY06 AGENCY 1-12-85 DIRECTORS' BENEFIT POINT COUNT Days Off Health Dental LTO Life Retire Total Adult Day Program 37 24 4 1 4 64 73 ARC 10 0 0 0 0 0 10 Big Bros./Big Sisters 45 12 2 0 0 17 76 Boy Scouts 22 12 2 1 1 36 Est. 74 CAHHSA/VITA 32 12 0 0 1 22 67 Camp Fire 45 12 2 0 0 0 59 C".14ental Health 52 12 2 1 4 40 107.5 Crisis Center 40 24 1/3 0 0 0 64.3 Food Bank 40 0 0 0 0 0 40 Domestic Violence 46 12 2 0 0 0 60 ESA 42 12 2 1 0 0 57 4-C's (Child Care 8) 26 24 0 0 0 0 58 Girl Scouts 44 12 0 0 y 23 79.5 Goodwill 42 12 2 1 1 0 58 RACAP 31 24 4 1 4 5 65.5 Handicare 27 24 4 0 0 0 55 Hillcrest 314 12 2 1 2 16 64.5 Independent Living 8 0 0 0 0 0 8 Iowa City Free Med. 30 12 2 0 4 4 48.5 Johnson Co.Red Cross 394 0 0 0 0 0 39.5 Legal Services 46 24 4 0 4 0 74.5 Lutheran Soc. Serv. 44 24 4 1 1 36 110 Mayor's Youth 36 12 2 1 4 15 66.5 MECCA 46 24 2 0 h 20 92.5 Rape Victim 56 12 2 1 4 25 96.5 Salvation Amy N/A School Children's Aid N/A United Action for Youth 40 24 4 1 1 13 83 United Ray 38 12 2 1 0 16 69 Willow Creek 30 12 2 0 0 0 52 Youth Homes 50 0 0 0 0 0 50 City/County Range points +50-60 TtB t Recommended Range: - po nts 27 N UNITED WAY OF JOHNSON COUNTY HUMAN SERVICE AGENCY FUNDING FOR FY84 Alin FY85 AND REQUESTS FOR FY86 Z Z Funding Designated Change Request Change FY84 FY85 84 84_85 FY86 85_86 Big Brothers/Big Sisters f 10.000 $ 10,000 f 1,160 -0- $ 12,925 29 CAHHSA (VNA) 45,500 45,500 1,207 4- 46,550 2 4 -C's 6,000 6,000 414 -0- 7,860 31 Hillcrest - - - - - 4,169 -0- Crisis Center - Intervention 22,057 23,000 1,414 4 25,840 12 Crisis Center - Emergency 10,450 11,500 -0- 10 12,646 10 Oomestic Violence Project 11,000 13,000 2,295 18 16,291 25 Elderly Services Agency 10,000 10,000 20 -0- 12,000 20 Free Medical Clinic 32,273 34,000 1,437 5 38,867 14 RACAP 2,300 2,000 -0- -13 19,179 859 Handicare - - 761 - - 10,400 - - Independent Living 9,375 10,000 483 7 16,720 67 Mayor's Youth Employment 4,800 5,400 419 13 5,500 2 Mark IV/Willow Creek Nbrhd. 15,100 18,000 485 19 20,000 11 MECCA - - - - 1,249 - - 3,000 - - Rape Victim Advocacy Prog. 3,000 6,000 1,053 100 8,943 49 Red Cross 17,000 12,000 1,610 -29 19,250 60 United Action for Youth 10,460 10,000 437 -4 15,000 50 Youth Hanes Inc. - - - • 1,037 - - - - - ARC 12,500 12,000 966 -4 12,000 -0- Goodwill 35,500 35,500 406 -0- 38,200 8 Campfire 5,573 4,500 128 -l9 5,792 29 Dental - Ind. Child. 3,000 2,000 4- -33 2,620 31 Salvation Army 5,000 3,000 1,470 40 7,000 133 Girl Scouts 12,000 10,000 405 -17 13,625 36 Boy Scouts 13,000 9,000 1,159 -41 15,000 67 School Children's Aid 3,400 3,000 260 -12 3,GO0 400 Lutheran Social Services °10,000 10,000 1,365 -0- 12,500 25 Geriatric Mobile Dent. 3,000 2,000 105 33 3,000 50 Legal Services 9,000 9,000 244 -0- 15,000 67 CIP - __ 257 Project Hope - - - • 1,016 Hospice - - - 3,054 - - - - Iowa Children Fam. Serv. - - - 615 Headstart 14,800 15,000 322 -1 Total $360,080 $331,400 $28,680 -7.9% $423,677 +27.8 - Salary Adjustments Requests 18.154 Grand Total $441,831 +33- 28 I adjustment NEW Red Cross 3,000 - - _ 3,000 66,000 CITY OF IOWA CITY 1,500 Adult Day Program -" HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY FUNDING 4 -C's FOR FY84 AND FY85 AND REQUESTS FOR FY86 __ 720 Independent Living_ - __ 10 000 New $90 351 Without Agency Fund in % Change 84-85 Request FY86 Salary Adjustment % Change 85-86 allocations *The freincluded mentwhich FY84 FY85 Crisis Center -Int. $ 339 970 Big Brothers/Big Sisters $19,910 $21,901 10.0 $27,800 Elderly Services Agency 26.9 Crisis Center -6.5 7,220 8,281* 14.6 8,460 2.1 Intervention United Action for Youth TCITN Crisis Center - Emergency 7,843 8,627 9.9 8,737 1.2 Domestic Violence Project 8,250 10,420* 26.3 14,500 53.4 39.1 Elderly Services Agency 25,850 27,159* 5.0 27,836 12.8 2.5 2,000 2,000 2,277 13.8 HACAP Mayor's Youth Employment 25,000 29,076* 16.3 29,000 5.4 .2 Mark IV/Willow Crk. Nbrhd 7,570 8,327* 10,0 9,400 23.1 12.8 Rape Victim Advocacy Prog. 8,969 9,865* 9.9 14,183 56.5 43.7 United Action for Youth 35.500 37 500* 5.6 39 365 5.2 4.9 Total Continuation $151,112 $163salary $184,558 18.1 ($21402) 3,3 adjustment NEW Red Cross 3,000 - - _ 3,000 66,000 MECCA Acute Care "" 1,500 Adult Day Program -" 6,141 4 -C's -- 3,000 Handicare "- __ 720 Independent Living_ - __ 10 000 New $90 351 MECCA Maintenance _ q�glg 68.5 (+$111,763) Tota c ithese additional received do al during FY85 for salary adjust- allocations *The freincluded mentwhich Crisis Center -Int. $ 339 970 Domestic Violence 2,484 Elderly Services Agency 696 Mark IV Mayor's Youth Employment 1,576 803 Rape Victim Advocacy Program 92 United Action for Youth TCITN TOTAL 29 �3S 1 � i ' j i I i - - -- 11 i NEW REQUESTS - EXISTI_NG AGENCY Elderly Services Agency 4 -C's Legal Services JOHNSON COUNTY - - -- 11 1,50n 6,141 5,000 HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY FUNDING REVISED 1-16-85 FOR FY84 AND FY85 AND REQUESTS FOR FY86 MECCA - Acute Care -- Agency Funding % Change Request % Change FY84 FY85 84-85 FY86 85-86 Big Brothers/Big Sisters $ 8,000 $ 10,800 35.0 $ 15,000 38.8 CAHHSA (VNA) 107,750 112,350 4.3 112,350 no change Community Mental Health Ctr 266,489 314,015 37.0 386,833 23.1 Crisis Center - Interv. 22,000 24,262 10.3 25,840* 6.5 Crisis Center - Emergency 7,843 8,635 10.0 9,498 9.9 Domestic Violence Project 6,600 7,800 18.1 19,500* 150.0 Free Medical Clinic 27,575* 30,899 12.0 34,408* 11.4 HACAP 4,175 4,175 no change 4,554 9.0 Independent Living -- 2,400 NA 3,120* 30.0 Mayor's Youth Employment 2,000 2,200 10.0 3,144* 42.9 Mark IV/Willow Crk. Nbrhd -- 2,000 NA 2,600* 30.0 MECCA 95,000 103,000 8.4 103,000 no change Rape Victim Advocacy Prog. 8,969 9,865* 9.9 14,183* 43.8 Red Cross 3,000 4,000 33.3 4,000* no change United Action for Youth 35,500* 37,500 5.6 46,000 22.7 Youth Homes 5,000 27,708** 454.2 54.600 97.0 Total Continuation $599,901 $701,609 16.9 $ 838,630* 19.5 Without (2137,021) Spec. Alloc. 13.3 NEW REQUESTS - EXISTI_NG AGENCY Elderly Services Agency 4 -C's Legal Services -- -- -- - - -- 1,50n 6,141 5,000 NEW PROGRAM REQUEST MECCA - Acute Care -- -- 110,000 $123,500 New Total $599,901 $701,609 16.9 $ 961,271 37.0 ($259,662) DNS Transer - Deleted from OHS Budqet 8 Transferred to Joint Hearing Process ARC Sumner Prog Adult Bay Program $ 11,791 10,800 ... $ 12,511 14,500* ,n ..n 6.1 34.3 A n $ 16,000 16,866 11 L16 27.9 16.3 1 r, Total With Transfer $634,930 $741,600 *Received special allocation during year **Received $22,208 in special allocation 30 16.8 $1,007,673 35.9 (266,0731 .i JOGS K 1. TOTA a. b. 2. TOTA a. b. 3. ENO'' 4. IN -1 S. NON. Rotas a H UNITED WAY OF JOHNSON COUNTY DIRECTOh. J,IDizA r<,D y AGENCY NAME: LI -G 5 CITY OF IOWA CITY • JOHNSON COUNTY ADDRESS: P.O. ?,0)( 2S'%6�. HUMAN SERVICE AGENCY BUDGET FORM PHONE: -�",S-764N FISCAL YEAR 1986 CALENDAR YEAR 1985 COMPLETED BY: /V 2J (Please circle year your agency uses APPROVED BY BOARD: //CS zed9natureF, COVER PAGE °o 4 toe) "/ CS Program Summary: (Please number programs to correspond to Income + Expense Detail, i.e., Program 1, 2, 3, etc.) Sce, 0ri�nJ, Local Funding Summary: VrAvc CALENDAR PROPOSED 1985 FlsLA� FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 Johnson County $ — $ — $ (J y City of Coralville $ — $ ------ ------ c- rnrm nruco rnNNTY UNITED WAY iT CO JUrrLCI'ILI\If\L 1983 1/1/3/31/84 4/1/3/31/85 (4/1/ 85- 3/31/86) United Way of Johnson County 60oo $ 1500 $ 6L11 `1 $ 7Sba FlsLA� FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 Johnson County $ — $ — $ (J y City of Coralville $ — $ ------ ------ c- rnrm nruco rnNNTY UNITED WAY iT CO JUrrLCI'ILI\If\L Director's Salary .Adjustment $3220 $ %DO $ — $,2520 1 AGENCY: BUDGET SUMMARY e,- ac ri <— C a� �' J 2 ACTUAL TNlS YEAR BUDGETED LAST YEAR PROJECTED NEXT/YEAR 1. TOTAL OPERATING BUDGET (Total a + b) 6q 0 a. Carryover Balance (Cash from 3) -�& � � I'M Q= . . . . . . .... m gog IP b. Income (Cash) 2. TOTAL EXPENDITURES (Total a + b) a. Administration b. Program Total (List programs below) WN, O 0 10 Ce, NEW - W. 3. ENDING BALANCE (Subtract 1 2) IN-KIND SUPPORT (Total from Pa e:5:) ,4. 5. NON-CASH ASSETS Notes and comments: 3,,Re4,m-,e— .P 08,886- &u eller &?", �� r 0 2 AGENCY: /q: INCOME DETAIL ACTUAL LAST YEAF THIS YEAF PROJECTEI BUDGETED ADMIN. PROGRAM PROGRAM NEXT YE 1. Local funding sources(List below 6000 ' z 59y0876q 1 00 b 86 b. l ., o£ I C I A C f T-; C. Sorrrl Sr r LL N7'( e. Y' f. 2. State, Federal, Foundations (List) a.C81�� CP„Lr✓ k l PPC T- a1 75'�l Im KO .”,rr :• .. IPI.FrNNr.\JS- �Hf%(�� II JJrO 30yS1% b.'-AIL�j[.k2E, ::..frNCr•L s c. GA'N N F T'( 'v 00'J TIO.J_ = 3. Contributions/Donations 5l 100 700 4. Special events(List below) /79 / 35 a. Nl>rm Elf r%1p 7 � I YE, b. WDfLYS - C. S. Net sales services �� aVnq!!a&, — — 2200 6. Net sales -materials — 57) /00 — / CO 7. Interest income 22— 20 2-0 20 — 8. Other(List below,including mist.) a. STT n f ii mfi m,^? 11r i�._F(�. ,t a . �. +.'•*.e. femr �'t, x' GIrLST �rn2 �S ri `� Cb.HJ2t ) "r w r lb�i /[)UA- r -A n. _ . , r : C. /' . i : e.r? C '� r !' _ . C'� S'.E•�,6r riin+'�.� x4`fi': c 3.? er TOTAL INCOME (line also on page 2, )03NS6 9N2.OS 161 I42 7635 21362 31 IO Notes and comments: AGENCY: INCOME DETAIL (Continued) 3a / ,� miffimmmim MIN � 1Y • � S 1 • `pC.S,•3y3,�:t� hSC'� t Y'"G�,epi. t gy[' k+.2......t t r,,. ��+1, {t.. y�� , i � � :.:, P�'.et3S &4'.A....:. ("e.�u�&rfi2�t6�� 3. Contributions/Donations ,4. Special events(List below) i' • r I MIME S. Net sales -services ______ sales-materials17. Interest ' ______ 8-. Other(List below,including misp4mmmmmm l��Sliiillllll1i��i�.. NOWeµ � )ate"i.: i �-... w �.!•.i ' ✓� TOTAL1(Show. on.page 2, line . Notes and coments: 3a / ,� EX?ENC 1. '. 2. E 3. 4. E 5. E 6. 1 7. 1 8. 1 9. 0. I 11. I 2. 1 3. 4. 5. 6. 7.� 8.� 9. Sr 0. I AGENL.. SALARIED POSITIONS Position Title / Last Name FTE* 5,,,(wvew,+ 1 5 cc.r-�� A7m„u!rG�T9Rf2i:F.(Z ;�s�nlyr cc�r�n�s -7:5;r---cTM,� 2sQFnN,o1vW E 9L1ClXn, N / M 111] AIVU 1.0 3F6,,, 2191- v T YEAR ACTUAL THIS YEAR PROJECTED NEXT YEAR. BUDGET S CHANGE 192 13572 '!�2S" - 00 — — / ? , r- •, ** a •✓�J 7 �l 6 LI70 RESTRICTED FUNDS (Complete detailjorms 7 b 8 Restricted by: Restricted for: C�\ 1�yA Pgv(.,, O'EvAl fFYnWG.J' ?isCd�L i(G�r....s �Mrir' GP TCA,2I A-1AA 1'TV 3T67 1Y b"..1-{)� T lB'•D LVv� T/�O'O MATCHING GRANTS Grantor/Matched by: • �•IAJI'. •�(� IN-KIND SUPPORT DETAIL Lx -e' r, r;. Material Goods v Space, utilities, etc. Other: (Please specify) AGENCY: I� L BENEFIT DETAIL TAXES AND PERSONNEL BENEFITS (List Rates for Next Year) TOTAL ACTUAL LAST YEAR THIS YEAR PROJECTED BUDGETED NEXT YEAR / I %1 1937 0 ` Sj FICA % % x LLD • 3 % x5 S x $ % x $ $Per mo.: ,indiv. 116S Per ov.:Ul/amity % x $ $ per month S x I 4 x $ — I S`S'L 725 Unemployment Comp. L' 5J j Worker's Comp. Retirement — Health Ins. — Disability Ins. — Life Ins. – Other (%14VOL If.dll..gtaff not.covered with certain'.Benefits, please note fn Comment Section. Sick Leave Policy: Maximum Accrual_hours _ days per year for years_ o days per year 'fqr year--- to— Vacation Policy: Maximum Accrualhours — days per year for years t o _ days per year for year _ to Holidays: days per year. Months of Operation During Year: Hours of Service: g DIRECTOR'S POINTS b RATES o S AFF BENEFIT POINTS DIRECTOR'S BENEFIT COSTS '0 Minimum Maximum Health Insurance _ $/Mon. Related to Supplemental Request _ y — for Salary Adjustment: Disability Ins. _ $�Mon. — Life Insurance $_(Mon. County $ Dental Ins. _ $_/Mon. UnitedWay $ Vacation Days Days _Other Holidays _ Days' — Sick Leave _ Days — POINT TOTAL i I OPTIONAL BUDGET FORM: y 7 (Indicate N/A AGENCY: a if applicable) DETAIL OF RESTRICTED FUNDS (Source Restricted Only --Exclude Board Restricted) A. Name of Restricted Fund (-` u 1. Restricted by: _ t=,� 2. Source of fund: 3. (P�urrposossee f.Q1,[�whhiich restricted: �d4 �i� g (�QyQ�1 p_ j�jd4'A I,4_ 4. rR-e investment earnings available for current -unrestricted exile ses? �� 'r� Yes ✓No If Yes, what amount: S. Date when restriction became effective: 6. Date when restriction expires: / I 7. Current balance of this fund: B. Name of Restricted Fund 1. Restricted by: 2. Source of fund: 3. Purpose for which restricted: 4. Are investment earnings available for current unrestricted expenses? Yes No If.Yes, what amount: S. Date when restriction became effective: 6. Date when restriction expires: 7. Current balance of this fund: C. Name of Restricted 1. Restricted by: 2. Source of fund: 3. Purpose for which restricted: 4. Are investment earnings available for current unrestricted expenses? Yes No If Yes, what amount: _ 5. Date when restriction became effective: 6. Date when restriction expires: 7. Current balance of this fund: /3s G) UN TO Wftq l IJwo} cow SonKsoN Co. SCS I S�� Soo i Soo 1329 — FE3rwAfey _ _ I CM cnaelu+- Soo 1529 _ l�2 s S6S aby _ cYlgk 1 �2�( ! Su�v 86S .0 234 36S 23'{ 3b5� 3bS I g29 Autr,�sr 233 36� 366 Ig2q ciao© 8(,5 233 3b6 366 Ig2q NOVEOWC Cr a 5 A 3r,S I g29 �33i 3b6.. bo $ qT2 j�2q 5aN �arut I✓az"PAY �� y�2 yg2 I5N19 Sole 5.n P 19v�. loo , p� 501, 1102,! Mir q0p 5o i �, I q� aoo 1 �I 53t� � O q;es-�/�b /,15 Gr- A-nInIF�T JoetN&o� CoJNf'j Hao 4n N6o NoU ,q6v `l0�7 N0� Yro K&D N6D y� Am levfl C r /3S AGENCY: nvr INCOME DETAIL 3 /j3- , AGENCY: Dl? ,'' I"LAST SALARIED POSITIONS Position Title / Last Name FTE* Program Coordinator/Meyer 1.0 Business Coordinator/Edwards .5 Children'sCoordinator/Jensen .5 Facilities Coordinator/ .5 new position I YEAR ` ACTUAL j Tni$ YEAR PROJECTED 1 NEXT YEAR I BUDGET i .6' CiANGE $15,098 f , $16,717 S-1-7--385- 15; 6,878 7.634 4T.; - .8.500- _•_ 42 1 ec n - -n- -n- Fy TJ new positio I RESTRICTEDfUUDS (Complete detail, Forms 7 & 8) Restricted by: Restricted for: DW Board ren ins nriec9 FE:14 food qnA q 9.qnn 9 Rnn -0- $ 3,304 -0- MATCXING GRANTS Grantor/Matched by: I I i I L IN-KIND SUPPORT DETAIL Services/Volunteers , $92,000 $80,400 $98,400 Material Goods S 5,000 I $ 5,000 I S 6,500 -Space, utilities, etc. Other: (Please specify) d it r r lamer for counseling contacts --4-5 �• •a aY I i vity of Iowa City MEMORANDUM DATI: 11 January 1985 To: Councilmember Strait Q FROM: Robert W. Jansen, City Attorney �•� U RE: Newsracks Attached is a copy of the Greenwich, Connecticut research case you asked me about. cc: All other Councilmembers /3(0 Southern Connecticut Newspapers o. Creentuich 11 bled. L. Rptr. 1051 Statement at 5, could shed meaningful their possible stage of the trial. Absent light on the questions at issue in this suit. compelling circumstances warranting an His alleged disregard for Israeli troop exception, the parties will be required to casualties during war is not reliably pro. conclude their discovery on all issues pri- bative of his attitude towards the wanton or to the first stage of trial. slaughter of innocent civilians. And any SO ORDERED. such proof would necessarily entitle Gen. eral Sharon to attempt to prove his own version of the events involved, and argu. ably also to demonstrate that he acted no more cruelly or with no less regard for the value of human life than other re- spected or even reversed generals or na- SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT .onal leaders who have been responsible for inflicting heavy military or civilian NEWSPAPERS v. GREENWICH casualties in war. In short, this case will ' not be transformed into a referendum by U.S. District Court jury on General Ariel Sharon's military style or ability. District of Connecticut ` V. Conclusion SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT The evidentiary issues already raised NEWSPAPERS, INC., v. TOWN OF by the parties will no doubt become more GREENWICH, CONNECTICUT, et refined after further discovery. The scope A., No. B-83.727, August 28, 1984 of discovery permitted under this memo. randum may therefore need to be refined REGULATION OF MEDIA as well. In general, however, the issues in DISTRIBUTION this case are dear: whether at General Sharon's meeting with the Gemayels he Print media distribution — "News - discussed the "need" for the Phalangists rack" ordinances (§25.17) to average Bashir Gemayel's death, Town ordinance which restricts loca. whether the Commission Reports secret tion, size, appearance, and method of se - appendices contain details of the meeting, curing newsracks, without any showing whether TIME could reasonably have of need for such restrictions, which re - believed that such materials were in the quires distributors, again without any appendices or that the details allegedly factual supporting basis, to indemnify described were true, and, of the answer to town against any finding of liability re - all these questions is negative, whether sulting from newsracks and to hold li. and in what amount General Sharon is ability insurance, and which requires entitled to damagn. newsrack operators to obtain permit The significant differences in the evil- from chief of police• who has been vested dence that will be admissible on truth or with vague and virtually uncontrolled ` falsity, on the one hand, and on malice or discretion and who can delay issuance of damages, on the other, and the complica. permits for up to three working days, tions and likely inability of the jury to violates First Amendment. although avoid giving improper consideration to town can require newsracks to display same potentially prejudicial evidence in distributor's name, address• and tele. this case at this point makes a bifurcated phone number. trial seem more efficient and just than a single -stage trial. If a bifurcated trial is �- uuhimately ordered, the first stage will concern only the question whether the Newspaper challenges town ordinance article was false and defamatory. If the regulating newsracks. On newspaper's jury concludes that the article was false and defamatory, the second stage of the motion for injunctive relief. Defendants enjoined from enforcing trial would consider whether TIME act- all provisions of ordinance except that ed with actual malice and, if it did, the requiring all newsracks to be labelled appropriate award. The parties should with distributor's name, address, and brief this issue before October 1, so a final decision can be made. During the telephone number. David S. Golub. of Silver Golub & pretrial process, however, discovery should proceed concerning any material Sandak, Stamford, Cut")., for plain0r. John E. Maerbergen, Greenwich, properly discoverable on any issue at ei. Conn., for defendants. led. L. Rptr. 1052 Suuthern Cnnnrrurut Nrcnpaprrs , G,eenunch F,,11 T,,,I.,(minion the ordinance" provisions are .arbitrarily irrationally directed solely against and ne.vsrit" even ihnugh other objects are 'I-uwo Burns, J.: situated on sidewalks. Sime of these claims are direced against the fa - plaintiff, Suuthern Connecticut News- tial "I" ..utinnel"v of the orJinance; factual basis fur the papers, Inc, and intervening plaintiff, New fork Times Sales, Inc, chef- others xueck the ordinance's provisions. �� trial was held evidence the lenge the constitutionality of the urdi- newsracks promulgated at which defendants prescnteJ on the background and tinea basis for nance concerning f Greenwich to became the ordinance. by the Tuwn o effective November25, 1983. The Court issued a temporary restraining order against the enforcement or which e the ordinance Town on December 6, 1983, voluntarily continued until this ruling. The hearing on plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction was consolidated with a trial on the merits. Plaintiffs distril ue daily newspapers in the Greenwich, Connecticut, area. One of their methods of circulation is through newsracks. The Town's ordi- nance establishes a licensing system and regulates the placement of newsracks "so that such Newsracks shall not unduly obstruct Sidewalks, interfere with the public's right to unhampered passage therein, create traffic congestion or illegal parking or stopping by motorists in order to purchase newspapers, damage munici- pal property because of the chaining of newsracks to poles, traffic standards, trees, or other fixtures, interfere with the performance of municipal services, create unsightly conditions, and endanger the safety and welfare of the inhabitants of the Town of Greenwich." Ordinance, Section One. Plaintiffs challenge the ordinance as violation of their first, fifth and four- teenth amendment rights under the Unit- ed States Constitution. Plaintiffs claim that the requirements of a license and financial security subject them to a prior restraint of their right to distribute their newspapers, that the ordinance vests ar- bitrary and unreviewable discretion in the defendant Chief of Police to deny plaintiffs the right to utilize newsracks, that the odinance fais to proccduralydue process) prior toojd them seizure of the newsracks, that the ardi- nancc' s standards governing location, size, appearance and method of attach- ment of newsracks are overbroad, arbi- trary, unnecessary and vague, and that ' The Town has not pressed its valuti interests. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. 'The plaintiff Southern Connecticut Newspapers, Inc., publishes and distrib- utes Greenwich Time, a local daily new, distributed in the Greenwich, Connecticut, area. ? Plaintiff Southern Connecticut Newspapers, Inc., has, for years, utilized newsracks as one means of distributing its newspaper in Greenwich, Connecticut. 3. The plaintiff; The New York Times Sales, Inc. distributes The New York Times, a daily newspaper distrib- uted in the Greenwich. Connecticut, area. 4. The New York Times is distributed through newsracks in Greenwich. 5. Defendants Pearson, Breed and Ivlargcnot are the First Selectman and Selectmen, respectively, of the Town of Greenwich. 6. Defendant Keegan is the Chief of Police of the Town of Greenwich. 7. On September 19, 1983, the defen- dant Town of Greenwich enacted an "Ordinance Concerning Newsracks" (hereinafter "the Newsrack Ordinance") purporting to regulate the use of news - racks in public areas of the Town. S. Plaintiffs, and other newspaper dis- tributors in the Town of Greenwich, are sub,'cct to the provisions of the Newsrack ab- sent thiscCour'sis issud be ance of effective emporary restraining order. 9. Chief Keegan is responsible for en- forcing the Newsrack Ordinance. 10. Chief Keegan became aware of and ce of thensSelectmen groups respect to the newsracks, 11. Captain Gleason, who, as com- mander of the Traffic Division of the police depenment, is responsible for the safe and efficient now of vehicular and e pedestrian traffic in the Town, first be- came aware of the question of newsrack 2 f# ,) Southern Connecticut A'em+paper+ u. Greenwich 11 Fled. L. Rpm 1053 placement while attending meetings of mens to property, Section 3. In addition, notwithstanding corn the Board of Selectmen and from tele• no newsrack, . C' from the Selectmen's office ance with the other more specific provt- phone calls inf 11ac pof complaints. "When be stsuch activity operatedor 12. Commissioner Works, John J. Kennedy, whose respon- maintained endanger the safety of Persons or proFer- when such newsrack interferes sibility it is to maintain the public sidewalks free of public hazards, first ty.... or with or impedes the Bow of pedestrian or t he use of learned of the proposed newsrack regula- ih«uub ects�permitted t at or near /' (` tion at meetings. 13. Kennedy'sCaaassistant in charge section locatimust identify address a`nd. Each stele- fie Garabedian, be- of traffic safety, Garothe the nam , hone number of the distributor, Section came aware of the newsrack question He attended, for p 3B(6)• through his assistant. meetings of the If the Chief of Police determines that other reasons, various Board of Selectmen at which the news- violation of the ordinance has occurred, , request a hearing rack ordinance was discussed. the distributor may hearing ofhcer appointed by the 14. The Department of Public Works did not initiate or initially recommend before a Chief, Section 5A. Unless the hearing the distributor a reasonable enactment of any ordinance restricting co officer grants in which to comply with his deter. newsrack distribution. There also was no time the Chief shall order removed evidence that the police department pro• mination, any newsrack found to be in violation, posed the enactment of a newsrack 5B. An appeal from an adverse Min.Section 15. The Town's decision to enact the decision may be made to the Board of shall schedule a hearing Newsrack Ordinance was not based upon safety study. Sever- Selectmen who within ten days of the written request, any written report or a1 Town officials, however, including of• Section 6A. The appellant has the bur- hearing, Section 6A. ficials from the traffic engineering divi• sion of the Public Works Department den a( proof at the The distributor may bring a civil suit m the Board of Se- traffic division of the police de art- review the decision of and ment. reported orally at Town meetings. 16. The Newsrack Ordinance impu1es lecimen, Section 6A. yy atethe y ninety herere approximately p toxks of detailed restrictions on the location, newsracks in the matt17, es of public in Greenwich. and appearance of Town of Greenwich, including a re- a per- 18. There arc approximately 100 located in the Town quirement that distrihumrs obtain installation of any newsrack. newsracks presently of Greenwich. In 1981, there were zp- mit prior to According to the terms of the ordi- proximately 20.25 newsracks and in nance, the Chief of Police shall issue a business 1982 approximately 50. has not received a sin• one-year permit within three days after an application therefor has 19. The Town gle complaint of personal injury caused been filed, but, as a condition of the issu- an in- by newsracks. has received no coin• .once, the applicant shall execute with the Town 20. The Tnwn of damage caused by demnity agreement against damages for personal injury lie plaints property newsracks. been brought property damage resulting from the newsracks, Section 2B, CIO and P.; the 21. No lawsuits L;tre against the Town fr upersonal injury or applicant shall provide the Town will' a insurance with a property damage involviuq newsracks. hmm hrrn made against reni0rate of liability minimum of 51,000,000 aggregate cover. 22 No claims the TONT for m,mry d.ttt':'ges as a result age fur personal injury claims and 5500,000 coverage for property of claimed personal ioinry or property involving nesr.nn Its. aggregate damage claims arising in connection with damage 2}, The Town tun ower made any newsracks, Section 2C:(2): and the instal- of voluntary paymems Iw personal injury cause y latinn, operation and maintenance orpropemy dnnt.tgr shall comply with the pnrvi si-ns in the ordinance as well as will' newsracks. The Town has c(rived no com- ®new•aracks uuh reasonable rules and regulations as 24. ints than drivers h-," been distracted the Chief of Police may establish, Sectionnewsracks Ely or tb,tt newsracks have 2D. The ordinance limits the newsracks' and attach- contrihmrd o' any .tit tdrnts hwa'ion, size, rn(nr. lettering, I I Med. L. Rptr. 1054 S'autiv,o GL.wecuntt Sewspapen v. Greenunch 25. Town officials have never urdued newsracks that are not applicable to 0111 - the removal of Sn)neusm,k nn he basis cr objects on the ad,walk. safety cnnsider- that it presented a safety hazard. 37. The same public to in, r ma - 26. The public sidewalks in die Tnwn are of varying widths and ations are appliadde chine to, a 1 own sidewalk, whether n lfor of Greenwich lengths, and include sidewalks adjarent deduct anlewhethersit offersor nitems to sweets, parks and beaches. The have volumes of pedes- p sale or free. There is no safety rationaletwo sidewalks varying trian and vehicular tralfic and are omni- t for prohibiting the placement of ova selling the same newspaper on tared by different types or traffic cantrol r 6cks black. signals. 27. Sidewalks in residential sections of 38. There is no need to regulate news. reeks at public botches or parks. P the Town of Greenwich arc approxi- 39. Newsracks affixed to Town prop- nmtely five feet in width. Sidewalks in ly districts are generally snider. crt40. Tilecausesignicant e dshas commercial 28. The public safety considerations aTown recce veddno earn - hints from private property owners or applicable to the placement of any object, including newsracks, on a sidewalk vary P u, uhty companies to whose property have been affixed. from location to location and sidewalk to newsracks 41. Objects, including wastebaskets, sidewalk 29. In the opinion of he Town of telephone pay stations, Ades and sins attached, often by bolting Greenwich Traffic and Safety Engineer, of three feet in width are commonly ar chaining in a clear passageway is all that is necessary to maintain public iv".,ckse hiwalttsa ed secured by bolting, chain - safety in residential sidewalks. some fashion, whether are safer than unsecured 30. In the opinion of the Commission- in or otherwise of he Department of Public Works newsracks. er and tite Traffic and Safety Engineer of ANDCONCLUSIONSOf the Town of Greenwich, newsracks may DISCUSSION be safely placed at many locations pro- , hibited by the Nawsrack Ordinance, and there is no need for an absolute 'rule barring newsracks from specific types of locations such as crosswalks and 31. The Newsrack Ordinance does not establish different standards for different types of sidewalks. 32. Objects other than newsracks are commonly located on Town sidewalks, sometimes near street corners, cross- walks and bus stopPs. Such objects include mailboxes, wastebaskets, telephone pay stations, utility poles, parking meters and traffic signs. 33. Many of hese objects arc as large as, if, not larger than, newsracks and of equal or greater solid opaque mass. 34. These objects are not subject to location, size or appearance restrictions such as those imposed by the Newsrack ordinance. 35. There are multi -colored objects and signs located on Town sidewalks in Greenwich, including lighted, neon and reflectorized signs. 36. The same public safety consider- ations are applicable to all objects placed on Greenwich sidewalks, and there is no reason to have special standards for M It is clear that the first amendment protects the distribution, as well as the puslintion, of newspapers. See Let -ell V. Cogen, 303 U.S. 444, 452 (1937). News racks are one method of distributing newspapers — a method particularly convenient for those who are not very mobile or who cannot buy newspapers during regular business hours — and are, therefore, protected by the first amendment. See, c.g., Southern New Jersey Newspapers, Inc. u. New Jersey Department of Transportation, 542 F.Supp. 173, 183 (D.N.J 1982); }filler Newspapers, Inc. V. City o Keene, 546 F.Supp. 831, 833 19 Med.L.Rpir. 12341 (D.N.H. 1982); Ru- bin u. City of Rrrugm, 553 F.Supp. 476 (N.D.III. 1982). The Town and its officials may im- p,,, reasonable, coment-neutral time, place and manner restrictions on the ex- ercise of first amendment rights only if the regulations are clascly related to a significant government interest and leave adequate alternative channels for com- munications. See tarry Educational Auoci- ation o. Perry Local Educational 4r nciatian, 51 U.S.L.W. 4165, 4167 (1963); Ilegron u. International Saeirty for Krishna Can - let o..nets, 452 U.S. 640, 649 17 M lx Southern Connecticut Newspapers u. Crrrnwich 11 filed. L. Rpu. 1055 C® %Ied.L.Rpir. 14891 (1981). Plaintiffs tiary support' There is no evidence that claim here is not that the regulations these officials proposed the ordinance or prevent altogether the distribution of public)y expressed their concerns about newspapers or that the Town's goal of safety hazards until after the Board of promoting safety is not a significant gov- Selectmen approached them. Their sub- ernment interest. Rather, the claim is jective, albeit sincere, belief that restrie- rhat they unreasonably restrict an impor- tions on the location, size, appearance Cant method of distribution, that defen- and securing it newssrack s are de irabhe dents' proferred justifications are specu- lative and unsupported by any empirical basis, and that the provisions are vague, ....broad and violate equal protection and due process of law. A. RESTRICTIONS ON LOCA. TION, SIZE, APPEARANCE, AND I.fETHOD OF SECURING Defendants presented testimony at the trial purporting to show that the ordi- nance is reasonable and furthers its in- tended purpose. Defendant Keegan stat- ed, "the potential liar physical injury to Pedestriansl exists and the fact that there is an absence of an accident or injury does not necessarily mean there isn't go- ing to be one". In a similar vein, defen- dants Garabedian and Gleason testified that, where a driver's sightline is limited, a potential safety hazard exists. They further testified that the location restric- tions in the ordinance are an "absolute minimum" for safety reasons and a rea- sonable safety regulation; that the size requirements promote traffic safety; that the color and appearance restrictions prevent dangerous distractions for motor - fists; and that the prohibition on changing or halting is justified in order to Promo public property, notwithstanding the f., that chaining has not interfered with any governmental function and that secured newsracks are safer than unsecured newsracks. In fact, there have been no accidents or injuries attribumble m the placement of newsracks. Town officials never ordered the removal of newsracks for public mfe- ty reasons. Nor was any evidence pre- sented to the Board of Selectmen or at the Town meeting which related in the safety requirements of particular hica- ,inns or even of residential as compared with commercial districts or of parks and beaches as compared with busy streets. No written report or documenmtinn was submiurd which supported even a gene. - al need for newsrack restrictions. The Town officials rc,pon ibic far traffic safety, some of wham attended meetings at which the pre, cased ordinance was considered, testihel at trial in canclumry teems about the need for such restric- tions, bill wiihnut particularized evidrn- a belief whic wa record only after the ordinance was en- acted, is an insufficient basis for the limi- tation of first amendment ppptr.rights. See U.S. 61,had v. B72-74 17 t1Med'L.Rhoum1452 4261 (1981). The ordinance's uniform restrictions on newsracks is not only unsupported by convincing evidence, but overbroad in that no need far the uniform guidelines has been shown. The Town has failed to meet its burden of proving the need for the location, size, appearance and secur- ing provisions in the ordinance. Not only did the Town fail to provide adequate evidentiary support for these provisions, it wholly failed to justify the need to regulate only newsracks in this manner. The concerns for traffic safety expressed by the defendants' witnesses are applicable to many objects placed on or near public rights of way. The Town's interests in safety may be equally served, with less intrusion on first amendment activities, were it to regulate these other objects in addition to or instead of news - racks. The Town has failed to prove that the newsrack ordinance is narrowly drawn ... to serve [the Town's] interests without unnecessarily interfering with First Amendment freedoms". VdfoSe of Schaumburg o. Cilizem/or a Better Enuimn- meet, 444 U.S. 620, 637 (1980). B. REQQUIREMENTS OF FINAN. CIAL SEL`URITY The ordinance places financial bur- dens on newspaper$ sold through news - racks. The distributor must agree to in- demnify the Town against any finding of liability resulting from one of its news - racks and must hold liability insurance to in ection with one of�iits newsrms acks. There is no history iS,ion 36 of the Ordinance, which pro- h;bits the placementof an), newsrack where it •'could endmtger the safety of Perans or ppra wrly . - or when tech newsrark inter- feres v, ties ;m do the row of pedestrian or vehicular ,atir .. or other objects per - mined at or near utd location: is inherently vague and could not he apported by evidenre. 11 Med. L. Rpir. 1056 Southem Cunnecncut A}uepapers u. Greenwich of injuries and claims which supports din:nee, and such reasonable rules and the Chief ^ such a requirement. No lawsuits imohv regulations as may establish. l ing newsrzcks have been filed against the Issuance of the permit is conditioned on Town, and the Town has made no vol- compliance within the financial security unary payments on account of news- requirements discussed above. rack -related injuries or damage. That is, The structure of Section 2 governing there is no factual basis for the ordi- permits is somewhat awkward. It ap• nance's insurance requirement. Absent a pears, however, that the Chief of Police countervailing interest of compelling int- has no discretion but to issue a permit portance, the Town may not burden in- within three business days of the applica- [crests protected by the first amendment. tion unless the financial security require- Sfinneopalis Star and Tribune Camjwny u. mems have not been met. A strxightror- Vinnesota Commissioner of Revenue, 51 ward reading of the ordinance, then, U.S.L.W. 4315, 4318 19 Med.L.Rptr. reduces the permit requirement to a mere 1369 (1983). Although the Town surely bookkeeping mechanism to provide the has a significant interest in promoting Town with centralized information on public safety, it has not established a newsrack location and ownership. As compelling need for the insurance or in- with the identification requirement on demmty provisions. Those provisions each newsrack, the Town has an interest cannot be justified on the present record. in keeping track of items placed on the C. REQUIREMENT OF public rights of way. So much of the IDENTIFICATION application materials as provides the The ordinance requires each newsrack Town with the minimum information to display visibly the name, address and needed to identity the distributor and to - telephone number of the distributor. cation of each newsrack do not offend the This identification provision is consistent first amendment. To the extent that issu- with the Connecticut statute requiring ance of a permit is conditioned upon fi- similar information to be placed con- nancial security, the discussion, supra, sPPicuOusly on vending machines. Conn. applies and the requirement is not just[- Cen. Stat. §21a-46. The information al- lied. To the extent that the Chief of Po - lows the Town or the public readily to lice may delay the issuance by up to three get in touch with the distributor in the business days, the permit requirement event of an injury, property damage or a newsrack. Unlike the or- constitutes a prior restraint unJus[ified by interest Town. The malfunctioning dinance in Talley o. California, 362 U.S. 60 Town of Greenwich's or- any significant of the licensing authority must be guided by "narrow, definite stan- (1960), the objective, and dinance does not require identification Of dards" before a prior restraint, even one the person who "printed, wrote, com- of short duration, may be imposed on piled or manufactured" the passer. Nor first amendment freedoms. Shuttltrororth does the ordinance require public identi• u. City.. Birmingham, 394 U.S. 147, 151 fication of those who choose to distribute (1969). No such standards have been ar- a newspaper by hand. Rather it facili- oculated and the three-day delay is tato the Towns reasonable interest in invalid, overseeing objects placed an public rights of way and the public's interest in having More si nificant than the permit re - itself es uircmen[ is the vague and virtual - l)' uncontrolled discretion granted the tion requirement don not uncons[itu- Chief in his rule-making capacity. Com- tionally .Rend plaintiffs' freedom of the pliance with the ordinance requires more 1 press: D. THE PERMIT REQUIRE - posscssian 0f a permit. A distributor must observe not only all the provisions y1 v l MENT AND APPEALS AND of the ordinance but, also, the "reason- PROCEDURE PROCEDURE challenge the ordinance's able rules and re§ulations' which the permit requirement as a prior restraint of their first amendment Chief may establish. The ordinance, however,ons , does limit the scope of these and as violative due process rights. A distributor may not exec to must be reasonableCeFirs amthat y amendment rights install, operate or maintain a newsrack without fit obtaining a from the may not be subjected to such uncon- official discretion, Shuttlerurorth o. �• hr �t Permit who issue the pthe Chiefiwiitth trolled City of Birmingham, supra. nolice, three business days oter application has been filed, and without Finally, the ordinance fails to contain complying with the provisions of the or. adequate due process safeguards. Under ,vamlod, Ltd., V.:vewroey rights Defendants are preliminarily and the ordinance• a distributor has the right stars violates plaintiffs first amendment rmanently enjoined from enforcing Q b a hearing before is officer designated ng by the Chief e of Police at which it may Pe fen- challenge the Chiefs determination of a these provyyisions o[ the es addresses and violation 'hearing. ANo time other appeal smaytba taken 'order i4 their names. distributorit tone IC similar information, along to the Board of Selectmen, and a hearing, telephone numbers on each newsrack an at which the appellant bears the burden to p If the of proof, must be available Iwiin tcn NO time Che( of Police- nln all other respects de- C Q days of the notice of Appeal thereafter. Tlimits are he Chief f or Palace is a hor- ordinance.re enjoined from enforcing t c izcd to seize any offending newsrack Plaintiffs may submit requests for days of the filing of this notice of viola- their reasonwithin thirty within three days of the able attorneys' fees do costs tion, unless the hearing ofBar grants an Y extension of time in which to comply. R SO ORDERED. The ordinance permits the Chief of Police to seize the newsracatbeµhre even the an administrative appeal, appellate bears the burden of proof, is heI d. 6y contrast, the Supreme Court has held that "any system of prior mesh im comes tintol coup gearing y sumpti reon against its constitudonat v u. I ity" Southeastern Promoiio, 558 nr, (1 NAMLOD, LTD., v. NEWSDAY Conrad, 420 U.S. 54 G Med.L.Rptr. 1140) (larit st(1) urt r- more, the licensing authority must (1) be New York Supreme Court required to institute such Judid I review Suffolk County Prtxeedings and bear the burden of justt- NA`ILOD, LTD., d/b/a CAMEL- issue tying its refusal to issue a Permit; (2) assure that anyinicri Fest 1 determination will be of BACK CLUB v. NEWSDAY, INC., pending j uarantce swift, No. 8905, September 18, 1984 brie( fid. and (3) B REGULATION OF MEDIA final Lid. . Conrad,jupra ate5G0. ThIsola- he CONTENT tionr, Town's ordinance does not do. A distri6- ion—Libel per se (411.01) utor can be preliminarily restrained from Defamat using a newsrack and then bears the, r- den of proving a first amendment viola- Newspaper's caption whichp accompa- udicial re; plaintiff corporation and which stated tion or ober right to use the newsrack, nied phot of bar o crated y with no provision for prompt j Nassau detective;' and that' Nassau de- view. Therefore, the appeals procedure is that bar was ' where out was shot y invalid. trotive shat youth outside E.es hough uket disco;' is not libelous per se, Fc- CONCLUSION plaintiff alleges that shooting did not in cur in or at bar but in separate parking The Town of Creenwicli s ordinance lot, since ca dons arc not directed to- ,� concerning newsracks rongdoing• contains restric- wards plainufl and do not accuse plain- tiogoverning the location, size, appear- tiff of any w m ance and mechanism for securing news- racks which are unsupported na by Libel action against newspaper. On evidence; the requirements of financial newspaper-, motion for summary security have n^ factual basis; the prnvi- sions permitting prior restraim 7 bothgcn at the time of he permit application and Jud Granted. Setaukc4 N.Y., dift pending administrative and Judi are not Stanley L. Shapiro, view of a finding of vinlati,n — for laintilT. of Townley & narrowly drawn with definite and objet• Andrew L. Hughes, y live standards and with guarantees Of Updike, New York, N.Y.. for defendant. swift judicial action. Each of these provi- P POLICE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT December 1984 The end of the calendar year is also the end of the reporting year for law enforcement statistics. Consequently, this report will summarize differences noted in the statistics gathered in 1984 as compared to those of 1983. A total of 2890 citizen generated requests for police services was received in December, 1984. While some increase was noted in a few categories of complaints, there were really no significant changes when the December statistics are compared to the prior month. Called for services continued to increase moderately in 1984 as compared to previous years. However, arrests, citations and tickets were somewhat less than the number recorded in 1983. A five year comparison is offered below. Requests for Service Arrests/Citations/Tickets 1980 - 29,128 35,871 1981 - 28,992 32,792 1982 - 32,183 40,867 1983 - 34,258 36,179 1984 - 34,497 32,541 In addition, officer generated activities and various service related activities such as car unlocks; assistance to citizens; services to other agencies; records checks and warrant services added nearly 60,000 other tasks, thus bringing the grand total of all police activities to 120,000 for 1984. The following categories of citizen requests for police services (complaints) recorded some increase in 1984 as compared to 1983. These figures indicatere orfs of crime received from citizens. They do not include that su sequent investigation substantiated the report or that the reported crime had, in fact, occurred. Report Classification 1984 r � POLICE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT December 1984 The end of the calendar year is also the end of the reporting year for law enforcement statistics. Consequently, this report will summarize differences noted in the statistics gathered in 1984 as compared to those of 1983. A total of 2890 citizen generated requests for police services was received in December, 1984. While some increase was noted in a few categories of complaints, there were really no significant changes when the December statistics are compared to the prior month. Called for services continued to increase moderately in 1984 as compared to previous years. However, arrests, citations and tickets were somewhat less than the number recorded in 1983. A five year comparison is offered below. Requests for Service Arrests/Citations/Tickets 1980 - 29,128 35,871 1981 - 28,992 32,792 1982 - 32,183 40,867 1983 - 34,258 36,179 1984 - 34,497 32,541 In addition, officer generated activities and various service related activities such as car unlocks; assistance to citizens; services to other agencies; records checks and warrant services added nearly 60,000 other tasks, thus bringing the grand total of all police activities to 120,000 for 1984. The following categories of citizen requests for police services (complaints) recorded some increase in 1984 as compared to 1983. These figures indicatere orfs of crime received from citizens. They do not include that su sequent investigation substantiated the report or that the reported crime had, in fact, occurred. Report Classification 1984 1983 Criminal Homicide 1 1 0 30 24 +6 Rape Assault 257 253 +4 Robbery 14 19 -5 Burglary 424 437 -13 1931 2151 -220 Larceny Motor Vehicle Theft 186 153 +33 35 22 +13 Arson Forgery/Counterfeiting 73 58 +15 /37 I December - Monthly Report Police Department -2- Report Classification 1984 1983 Fraud 120 60 +60 Embezzlement 28 14 +14 Possession, Stolen Property 9 6 -3 i Vandalism 1197 1394 197 Weapons, possession 67 51 +16 Sex Offenses 162 127 +35 'Family/Children Offenses 563 550 +13 O.W.I. 335 511 -176 Liquor Law Violations 117 94 +23 Intoxication 497 521 -24 Disorderly Conduct 4118 4057 +61 _ Vagrancy 54 75 21 454 424 +30 All Other Violations Motor Vehicle Accidents 2626 2527 +99 Alarms 1556 1612 -56 Towed Vehicles 1596 1866 270 Parking Problems 3257 2817 +440 Criminal arrests and citations declined moderately in 1984 as compared to 1983. During 1983, 2370 arrests were effected or citations issued. This figure includes one -hundred ninety-five juvenile arrests or citations. The 1984 total, including one -hundred sixty-five juveniles, is 2,106. Traffic enforcement continued at about the same pace in 1984 as in 1983. A total of 6,236 traffic citations were issued in 1984 and 6,245 in 1983. With a reported 2,527 automobile accidents in 1983 and 2,626 in 1984, the need for regular and rigorous traffic enforcement is obvious. If resources ever become available, one of the highest prior- ities of this Department will be the formation, training and proper equipping of a traffic enforcement/accident investigation unit for each of the three patrol shifts. Four officers were hired and received their basic training in 1984. One officer received disability retirement in January, 184. Animal Control activities were down slightly in December, 1984, and reflected a continuation of the decrease in called for services noted in most of calendar 184. Total called for services were 726 in 1984 as compared to 1,126 in 1983. Revenue earned by the division declined to $19,944 in 1984 from the $23,510 earned in 1983. The greater por- December - Monrthly Report Police Department 262 tion of this decrease can be attributed to the fact that 400 fewer animal licenses were issued in 1984 than in 1983, and that the ad- vocacy for spaying or neutering pets results in lower licensing fees for this type of pet. 9 hc. Engineers a Fanners January 9, 1985 �\ J-1090 Mr. Charles J. Schmadeke, P.E. Director of Public Works Y r City of Iowa City Civic Center 410 E. Washington Street N\ Iowa City, Iowa 52240 Subject: Wastewater Alternative Study Progress Report No. 2 Dear Mr. Schmadeke: This progress report covers the period from December 1, 1984 through December 31, 1984. During this period, progress continued on completing task 2.2.1, Investigation and Evaluation Phase, of our Agreement. The format for the report summarizing the results of this effort were reviewed with Mr. Loren Leach's visit on December 11, 1984. A draft version of the Phase i report was the City during 1984 for internal City submitted as scheduled on December 21, review. As of December 31, 1984 we have utilized a total of 59 calendar days of the contractural 160 calendar days (exclusive of City review) for submittal of the draft final report to the City. Please call if we can be of further assistance. Very truly yours, METCALF & EDDY INC. Lawrence J rski Project Manager LPJ/jpp X38 011ev, i T. Q? EIA fhL°i Targeting Sign Controls In his 1982 science fiction film. Blade Runner, director Ridley Scott gave us his interpretation of what twenty-first century billboards would be like in the polluted and overbuilt environment of Los Angeles. These billboards were mural -sized video ads that flickered in shocking colors from the sides of slowly drifting blimps while literally shouting messages at people on crowded streets. This vision of :he future is. in fact. firmly based on current advertising technology. A couple of years ago. for example, adva users introduced the portaboard—an inflatable. blimp -like billboard approximately 14 feet tall by 48 feet in length. New York's Times Square alrwdv has fully computerized. multicolor light boards that allow animated advertising and fast -changing advertising copy. And many major league baseball parks have computerized video screens that dash advertising between innings and use sound systems that command the fans' atlention. As outdoor advertising gels bigger, noisier. and more technologically sophisticated. it is appropriate to review examples of successful municipal sign controls. It's also appropriate because the outdoor advertising industry is growing -1983 billings exceeded SI billion compared to 5888 million in 1982. This issue of Zoning News examines some examples of sign controls for special areas. These controls prevent clutter, confusion. and adverse visual impacts. The targeted areas include strip commercial streets. major arterials. downtowns, and commercial centers. The idea of infecting sign controls is not new—the Planning Advisory Service reported on it several times. dating back m one of the earliest PAS reports. Signs and Billboards (PAS Report No. 28), published in 1951. What is new today is the number of communifies that target sign controls and the degree of precision and clarity in local standards. The ordinances described below set design. size. setback, and other requirements for signs ensure safety and to prevent clutter. Salr 144e Cire's Poster promoting citizen participation in city planning (detail berm, 1. sunt. IN: San LAe Cm OECEMBER tgaa AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION Targeting the Strettscape Many modem advertising signs arc directed to the attention of motorists. Frec-standing. projecting, and portable signs are oriemr to the street and can often dominate the strectscape. Often portable signs are virtually pushed out into the roadway—perhaps in hopes actually stopping traffic. The ordinances below are targeted to controlling signs near commercial strips, maior ancrials, and sceni roadways. The ordinance standards and procedures are intended to reduce the visual impact of signs and to presem signs from dangerously distracting the attention of drivers. Austin, Texas. Austin has designated -principal roadway and -scenic roadway areas where developers arc occulted to submit sit plans that meet ordinance requirements for landscaping• safe imffic access. and signage control. The city has also adopted a plan and special zoning regulations for protecting the scenic vistas alone the Capital of Texas Highwav IRoute 360). The special controls far principal and scenic roadways gencrally apply to the area within 20 feet of each side of the road right-of-way, ahhough this land arca may be extended in places specially designated on the zoning map. The land area affected by the Capital of Texas Highwav zoning includes all land located within 1.000 fee: of each side of the dedicated public right-of-way. In each type ofdesignated roadway. the following special sign regulations apply in addition to the zoning code's general sign regulations. ■ Principal Roadwnyx. Only one freestanding business and property identification sign is allowed on each lot. parcel. or tract. Adjacent businesses may combine multiple freestanding sign into one sign. Off -premise signs and billboards must he spaced no closer than 1,000 feet from each other when located on the same side of the road. Very limited exceptions apply to this spacing requirement — for example, an additional billboard may be erected within the 1,000 -foot space if the terrain allows only one sign to be visible at one time from one location. ■ Scenic Rnadnms. No off -premise sign or billboard is permitted within 200 feet of the road right-of-way. No on -premise sign is allowed within 200 feet of the roadway except for one berm sign per lot, parcai. oT tm:t. Ecra:ions are em20. monomer.! -like signs that are integrated into a development's landscaping plans. The maximum sign height allowed is equal to the square root of the distance from the proposed sign to the -main trawled wav" (i.e.. roadbed, excluding dnccways and deceleration lanesl. Sign size is limited to .7 square feet for every foot of scenic roadway frontage up to a maximum of 250 square feel. Facade or will signs are allowed provided that they do not exceed 70 percent of the sign area permitted for on -premise signs in the city's other commercial and industrial districts. No facade sign can exceed the building's rout line. No flashing or intermittent lighting can be used with any sign. Capiral V'rems Hipinsny. All signs must be berm or monument signs and must be constmoed of natural materials compatible with the surrounding environment. The letters on signs may not be more than two colors. No internal lighting may be used, and no neon or flashing signs are pcmfired. All spotlights nn signs must be hidden from view. No signs arc permitted on po,as, poles, or buildings. Sun Francisco. The San Francisco inning ode designates mire than 30 scenic malways and several -special sign districts.' Special sign districts include redevelopment areas. historic dismct%. and 139 commercial areas with heavy pedestrian traffic. Scenic streets include areas like Telegraph Hill Boulevard. Lombard Street. and roadways with excellent vistas of San Francisco Bay. the city skyline. parks. and hills. Sign controls for these designated streets ensure that signs do not obscure or diminish the city's scenic views. Along scenic streets. special sign regulations apply to any progeny within 200 feet of the street unless a greater depth is designated on the zoning map. No off -premise lien is allowed within the designated area. and no other signs exceeding ?W square feet are allowed. On -premise signs must meet all other general sign regulations on sign size. number. setbacks. and type. In special sign districts. the regulations vary depending upon the characteristics of the district. Very strict sign regulations. for example. apply in the Jackson Square historic district. within redevelopment areas that are designated special sign districts. special controls often strictly limit the use of projecting signs by commercial businesses. These controls apply because in many of these areas the city has put in street trees and other amenities that may be damaged or obscured by projecting signs. Fairfax County. The county uses -sign control overlay districts' primarily to control freestanding signs alone intensely developed commercial strip streets. The overlav districts limit individual commercial businesses to one freestanding sign of no more than 40 square feet. Fairfax County has applied the sign control overlay district to numerous commercial strip streets where uncontrolled signage can create traffic problems by obstructing sight distances. disincline motorists. and interfering with a drivers view of tnttfic signs and signals. Targeting Commercial Centers Many cities have tried to stimulate downtown redevelopment by making strcetscape improvements—adding street trees. street furniture (benches. kiusks. eta.,—and by replacing older traffic signs. when these public investments stimulate renewed private development. local officials often expect or require new developers and businesses to comtmct well-designed signs that are compatible with public improvements. As outlined below. Merced. California. requires improved signs in its redeveloping downtown area. The city of Seattle also has a variety of redeveloping neighborhood commercial districts. some similar to smaller city downtowns. In these neighborhood commercial districts. Seattle applies a flexible zoning option u) conventional sign controls. as described below. Local zoning codes also establish special standards for shopping center signs. w hick are often scattered among various businesses without any coordination to design or placement. Shopping center retailers often Only consider the size and appearance of a nciehl,wine sign wnvn the ncighlwr is a competitor. Discussed below is the Chula Vista. California. zoning code. which allows flexibility in local sign regulation when developers have programs to ensure greater design consistency for shopping center signs. Merced. California. Merced's downtown is a designated tax increment finance district where the city is encoumgine redevelopment by using increased downtown property tax revenues In make streeiseape improvements in the district. The city has already made substantial in%wments in improving the appearance of Lminr.\'^'r a+monlhll aplmsot to r+md Use tun 67amnr Dlern and the PAS ,time lubti•hed by the Amencm Plat A.vocmton. isn't Stollmtn. Execuuee Dumor. FnnN S. so. Drryty E•ecmnm Director. Judith Cmzch. Director of Rntmch: Slhn Lents. Publ.uom Dtmiar. Lminr.•y'rva i. pnJucd al APA. ni ma P. Smith. Until; Jim Hwmmmh aN Adele Mbbbli. A.•nunt Ulm - Cop) Wxa h Am Mit Planning Maaudun. I313E. holtsL. Chicago. It. hOh17. M Anwatc+n Pt,mxl; A.wnnoon has hnd4-mix of (wva+l 1776 sln.htveu A•e., $.l\'.. Woh."Itun. DC 20016, All npma rewnd. M r+n nl thi. publkainn may tv rrpnJucd,, utdud in any form to by m) mem•. eln'0o ,, nr ,.Whwal. imldmi Plwlavp•mf• rccndiM, or by any mfarmeum wow am rano", .)•mm. without petmuamn m ranting fmm thx Anarwm Plmmng A•••cuunn. the downtown and is encouraging existing and new businesses to make similar commitments. In 1983 the city issued a repon. Dowmnum Sign Guides. that explains some of the city's design objectives for business signs. The report is used by developers to draw up sign plans and by Mcrccd*s design review commission to evaluate proposed plans for new signs. In the downtown business zone. the city prohibits freestanding. off - premise. and projecting signs. Instead it encourages wall. awning. and other types of signs that arc oriented to pedestrians. The city limits the size of signs by limiting the amount of sign area to a fraction of the building street fmntaee. One square font of sign arca is allowed for each rout of building frontage for buildings of two stories or less. The total sign area is computed by measuring the sign cabinet size or by blocking individual letters when cabinets or frames are not used. All sides of a multisided sign are used in computing sign area. Seattle. The Seattle zoning code allows retail business associations to request that the city council adopt unified or unique on -premise sign regulations for neighborhood commercial areas or pedestrian commercial &t. icts. The process is called the -local option zoning district because the regulations are requested by local retail business representatives. These standards may be more or less restrictive than other commercial district sign regulations. In some cases. the local option may establish a complete set of standards: in others. it might only waive some existing on -premise sign regulations governing size. type. and number of signs. However. qualitative design standards requiring discretionary review by city sign inspectors cannot be included. Local option sign regulations are not allowed for billboards and other off -premise signs. A rezoning procedure. including public hearing and notice. must be followed in establishing a local option sign district to help ensure that these optional sign regulations reflect a consensus of the properly owners. retailers, and residents in the area. Once adopted. the regulations for a specific commercial area become part of the Seattle land -use code. Chula Vista. The Chula Vista zoning code authorizes -planned sign programs' for commercial and industrial developments of two acres or more. This is a voluntary. optional alternative intended to allow more latitude to developers and to promote good design and coordinated styles for signs. Shopping center and industrial developers who choose this altemative may be granted exceptions from the zoning codes regulations on the number and size of signs. In general. however. a planned sign program must be in substantial compliance with the zoning code. Applicants choosing this option must submit detailed plans to the zoning administrator. The plans must include drawings that show how the proposed signs will be placed on the site and how they will relate to the buildings exterior surface design. The plans must also illustrate the sten size: list the types of comtruction materials: describe the method and intensity of illumination: and include height and area dimensions. Criteria used to review the plan include compatibility of the sign with the buildings architectural style and with other signs—i.e.. similarity or replication of the letter style. color. illumination. method of structural suppon. and shape. The zoning administrator can approve. conditionally approve. or disapprove planned sign programs. The zoning administrants disapproval of a planned sign program may is appealed to the city planning commission. Targeting sign controls to commercial strip streets. major streets. shopping centers. and downtown districts can be highly effective. In specific targeted areas. it is easier to identify how signs may affect «ante safety. the dreetscapc. and a community's aesthetic objectives and to define specific standards that differ from general. citywide regulations. The next logical step in targeting regulations is to move from streets and zoning districts to specific land uses. A number of zoning codes have alreadyestablished special sign standards for gasoline stations. car dealerships. and amusement parks. Again. these standards for specified land uses are usually more effective thin generplized. citywide sign regulations. Communities Granted Antitrust Exemption On October 25. President Reagan signed the Local Government Antitrust Act of 1984 (P.L. 98-5441 giving all local governments protection from being assessed monetary damages it antitrust suits. The new federal legislation should stem the tide of litigation claiming that traditional municipal functions—zoning and land -use regulations. licensing of businesses. and granting trash collection and cable TV franchises—violate federal antitrust laws. The new legislation ends the threat of courts awarding triple damages in cases where local government action is found in violation of antitrust statutes. The law will prevent future damage awards like that in Unit%- Ventures v. Coonr of tnkr, where village and county governments were slapped with a staggering 528.5 millionjudgmcnt for violating federal antitrust statutes. The law still permits the courts to issue injunctions against local governments. ordering them to remove unfair restrictions on free trade. An important provision of the bill is its limited application to the over 100 penning antitrust suits that have been filed against localities since a 1982 U& Supreme Court decision. The new law can only he applied retroactively when the local government argues. and the court agrees. that in light of circumstances such as the'stage of the litigation and the availability of alternative relief equity requires the application of the new law to a pending case. Readers should look for more news on the effects of this legislation in upcoming issues of land Use Law & Zoning Digest. Workshop on Affordable Housing An upcoming two-day workshop on Affordable Housing should be of great interest to Zoning News readers. Sponsored by HUD and the American Institute of Certified Planners. this workshop will be held in three different locations: Orlando. Florida. January 21 and 13; San Antonio. Texas. February 4 and 5: and San Francisco. March 7 and 8. Development standards. site and building design. manufactured housing, and finance will be discussed by an expert faculty. We will provide a more derailed report on new derelopmcnt standards that encourage affordable housing in a later issue of Zoning Nen•s. The workshop is a product of the Joint Venture on Affordable Housing. which brings together a number of organizations that are working to find ways to reduce housing costs. The first workshop in this series. held in Chicago lost September. was very well received. HUD vpansorship makes the -price of attending estremch reasonable. Fur funher information, call or write to Christine Barbera at the American Plannine Association. 1313 East both St.. Meow. IL 60637, 311.955.9100. FCC To Review Zoning for Radio Antennas Following the lead of the satellite dish antenna industry. the American Radio Relay League (ARRL) Inst July petitioned the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) for a ruling that preempts local zoning regulations applied to amateur radio antennas (ham radios). The ARRL wants the FCC to issue a ruling that delineates the limitations of zoning and other local controls over amateur radia antennas. The petition specifically asks the FCC to preempt local zoning coda that preclude or significantly inhibit licensed amateur radio transmission and reception. Eariv in November. APA submitted comments on the petition. JoAnn Butler. an APA researcher. argued that there is a long history of separate federal and local regulation of radii, antennas. The FCC regulates the radin industry by licensing equipment and operators and by assigning transmission frequencies. Local regulations. in contrast. control antenna tower height and setbacks from property boundaries. The local gwxrnment role is to ensure that antenna movers are net visually obtrusive. do not conflict with surrounding land uses. and pose no dancer to nearby residents. According to Butler. state couns ham recognized the distinct areas of federal and local regulations. Butler also dismisses the ARRL allegation that local governments have enacted -severe restrictions. - In most cases. she contends. radio antennas are treated as accessory usca,and most local otficials recognize that a family's recreational and hobby activities—including the operation ofamateur radios— involve personal preferences that most communities arc reluctant to interfere with. The FCC set a November 9 deadline for comments on the ARRL petition and a December 1.1 closing date for filing replies to those comments. Floodplain Gambling Last summer the cin' of Clayton. Georgia. found out what the penalties are for failure to adopt federal floodplain management controls. The city had been participating in the -emergency phase' of the National Flood Insurance Program. In this phase- floodplain development is regulated on the basis of information contained in general flood hazard maps. When it came time to enter the -regular phase- of the program, in which development is regulated by detailed federal engineering studies of the arca. the city balked. Loral officials decided that the studies called for controls that would stifle the city's economic growth. Clayton. which is in northeastern Georgia. has been experiencing an economic boom due to the expansion of several nearb-v Blue Ridee Mountain resort areas and an increase in tourism. The city's action means that property owners who had purchased federal flood insurance in the emergency phase will not be able to renew their policies. Regular homeowners insurance doesn't cover flood damage, and this type of coverage is generally not available through private insurance companies. According to Susan Wilson of the Federal Emergency Management Agency. the city's decision will also have other repercussions: • Federal agencies like the Environmental Protection Agency or Department of Transportation will not give loans or grants to the city to build or improve roads. sewers. and water supply systems in the floodplain. (The city. however. may use its federal revenue sharing funds to make such improvements.) • Federal agencies such as the Small Business Administration will not Provide loans to firms building or expanding in the floodplain, and no federal mortgage assistance (e.g,, from the Veterans Administration or the Farmers Home Administration) will be available to people planning to build homes in the floodplain. • In the event of a flood. the community will not be eligible for federal disaster assistance beyond emergency food and shelter: that is. no federal funds will be made available for rebuilding an area that has suffered significant flood damage. • If the city later chooses to reenter the federal program, those homes and businesses built during the time period in which the community is not pan of the progmm will be penalized with higher insurance rates. Higher rates apply because these buildings will not meet federal standards for elevating or floodprooftng structures. • Local officials may now run some greater liability risks for the city because they have not adopted floodplain management regulations. Their withdrawal from the flood insurance program has effectively denied citizens the ability to buy insurance, They have also failed to take reasonable steps to reduce property losses despite having scientific data that indicates a flood hazard. 139 Clayton officials feel that the federal government should help channel floodwaters and make other structural improvements, but federal officials point out that such changes in the past have proved ineffective or have simply shifted the flooding problem to another city or town. Request for Information Minor subdivisions are land subdivisions that create a small number of buildable lots. Two APA members, Frank Bangs and Earl Finkler, ere conducting a study of state and local laws for minor subdivisions. The results of the study will appear as an article in Land Use law & Zoning Df,gar. Finkler and Bangs would like to hear from Ictal planning officials about: ■ State and local laws that authorize minor subdivision review procedures: ■ Local experience with streamlined minor subdivision review Procedures and the benefits and problems resulting from these procedures: and ■ Examples of local review procedures that allow adequate public Participation while preventing unnecessary delays. Copies of state and local minor subdivision statutes and any information about local experience would be very useful. Readers are asked to contact Earl Finkler. Director of Planning. 3900 Amlic BI%d.. Suint 301. Anchorage. AK 95503.907-562-2058. Zoning News Index -1984 Accessory Lyses in%asiun Arts, Satellite Earth Stations September Accessary Apartments March Conveniun or5inglc'F2m1ly Homes (Urbana. Illinois) January Policy on Accessory Dwellings lFairfax Canty, Virginal February Adaptise Reuse February Zoning for Adaptive Reuse April Administration November Business Calls for Streamlining January Cemtication of Zoning Officials IConnenimls February New fork IStams Zoning Census \larch Sex Businesses and Zanng Enforcement (Washington, D.C.) April ..amne Enforcement (Anne Arundel County. Maryland) June Jul, Conflict of Interest in Zoom; Hearings Nuvember Commercial Models Zaning for Liquor Stores l Los Angeles, February Clcan ne Up Saicano. IScm, No PX t.r,domgl�h' I M ay fir. Orkain Vrlw CMtickar Zanmg i%tnpeanmem d zoning) August San Fnnrix+is Neighborhnd Commercial Rezoning September In the )fake of the Tuun.t rtouriu-related deselnpm,mi October Cumprehensise Rezoning% December Austin. Texas, Adopts New Zoning Code lune -July Dallas 5fosas To Reform Zoning September Perlormance Zoning Curates m Largo. Florida November Computers April Computerized Lind -Use Atlases (New York City, October Cumputeneed Zoning IArhngton Height and Glendale Height. Illinois) October Legal lmplicauom of Computerized Zoning October Court Cases April Cost ofspnwl )Chin'Vrnrurcs ere Cnunry lfLrtrl March .Hurt..) Lnirrl 11 Continues 11ay Zoning To Protect )Pater Quality IAldre Propi•mrr ct. August Fiinnt Cuunn'. 1711*11a. BnvAlf.Suprrrsnrr) lune -July Supreme Csxin To Hear Zoning Caw I II'illinnnan Cau,nr et. Amid"., gent ) N,,%cmbur Definitions Zoning Definition of the Stanch March Must Nunhabitable Space Be Umnhabinble7 September Downtown Districts January Plan for Rezoning Downtown San Francisco February Height Controls ISan Francisco. Philadelphia. Piusburphl August L.A. TDRs November Environmental Protection Texasl Saves Trees January Bro and oust y Flan al avec To ronin roan water Neighborhood Recycling Centers (Lincoln. Nebraska) eF N�iry ` Siting Waste Disposal Facilities April lune -July Pennsylvania Pays for Floodplain Management September Floodplain Gambling December Fast -Food Restaurants The Bic Mae Attack IFreeoon kjainc) F b nj Gulden Arches Men Gaeway Arch 1St. Lou". Mtasoun, November Federal Statutes and Rules Federal Land -Use Regulations (HUD Assisted Projmsl April Federal Farmland Protection Rules Published October Communities Granted Antitrust Exemp ion December FCC To Review Zoning for Radio Antennas December Home Occupations August Zoning for Home Occupations IBve local ardinancesl Manch Bed and Breakfasl Inns ICalifomia ordinances) April Boise (Idaho) Adopts Child Cam Zoning May Housing Zoning for Emergency Slithers tChicago. Illinois, April Affordable Manufactured Housing (San Diego County. Califomias May Reducing Housing Costs (Columbus. Georgia) May Infill New "got -for Small PUM IPonland. Oregon, 1 ry Initiathn and Referendums Food's. Sinaloa IRancho Mirage. California January You Get What You Pay For IKanai County. Hawaii) %larch Referendum on Planning (Solana County. California) August Junkyards Growth in Ham Auto Repairs (Prince Williams County, Virginias April Lakewood, Colorado, Takes Junk Out of Zoning Code November Jllxtd Use Zoning for Mixed•Use Development August SoHo of the West (Dallas. Texasl October Parking Dnwnsizing Can and Parking Codes January Illustrated Guide to Parking Lot Landscaping March Rural Areas Managing Rural Growth May Signs an , nu s Fewer anu Smaller BillsuarJs (Raleigh. Norah Grolinal Fcbraary Houston s r<me innn cgu inions June -July Billboard Regulations for Fun Wonh, Teras August Targeting Sign Controls December SlaWProl'Incial Legislation Improving Zoning Enforcement (Maincl February Proposed LAnd•Uses Commission Replaces County Zoning Board of Appeals IMarvlanill February Track Record on Siting Waste Facilities (Illinois) February Vermont*: Land -Use Law Evaluated April Slate Statutes Limit Antitrust Liability' IMaryland. Nunh Dakota, May Slates Act on Affordable Housing August Saskatchewan Planning and Development Act Sepmmber /J9 i City of Iowa City MEMORANDUM DATE: January 18, 1985 TO: City Council FROM: Rosemary Vitosh, Finance Director RE: FY86 Budget Questions Following is a list of answers to questions asked by Council at the Budget Review Session on January 12, 1985. HOUSING & INSPECTION SERVICES - RECEIPTS Fire Prevention & Safety Inspection negative receipts - refunds of rental permits, for final budget this will be netted against rental permits. Building Inspection - showed $68 of rental permits, that's an incorrect coding. The final budget will show it in Building Permits. FIRE SERVICE CONTRACT WITH UNIVERSITY OF IOWA - YEAR OF YEAR TOTAL U. OF I. COST PER SERVICE BILLED SQ. FEET SQ. FEET SQ. FOOT BILL FY84 FY85 43,974,236 10,288,666 $ .04285 $440,869.34 FY83 FY84 42,258,116 9,568,799 $ .04206 $402,463.69 FY82 FY83 41,572,559 9,590,130 $ .03862 $370,370.82 ACTUAL FIRE IHSS AND TOTAL PROPERTY ASSESSMENTS - YEAR VALUE OF LOSS TOTAL PROPERTY ASSESSMENT % OF TOTAL LOST 1975 $ 334,382 $ 431,131,910 .08 1976 406,733 443,992,158 .09 1977 226,984 446,967,080 .05 1978 210,369 543,937,257 .04 1979 506,992 623,736,350 .08 1980 463,573 832,360,934 .06 1981 360,260 916,633,335 .04 1982 1,119,160 960,980,060 .12 1983 612,160 1,124,655,722 .05 1984 643,188 1,174,927,158 .05 BREAKDOWN OF ESL SALARIES AND BENEFITS - POSITION SALARY BENEFITS TOTAL Human Relations: ' -1 PPT Personnel Gen. 9,703 2,109 11,812 Broadband Telecommunications: 4 PPT to 3/4 PPT Prod. Coord. 4,838 777 5,615 -Interns 280 20 300 -Minute Taker 432 31 463 /�o POSITION SALARY BENEFITS TOTAL Finance: -Assistant Director 27,707 5,456 33,163 CBD: -PFT MWI 13,903 3,574 17,477 ' Police Records: -Clerk to Sr. Clerk 478 61 539 -Dispatcher 15,860 3,841 19,701 i Fire: -9 Firefighters 168,386 82,422 250,808 -Secretary 16,754 3,964 20,718 -Training Officer 26,965 10,906 37,871 Animal Control: -2 Officers 31,720 7,682 39,402 HIS: -Inspector to Sr. Inspector 665 85 750 Recreation: -6/8 to 7/8 Sr. 2,459 323 2,782 -}PPT to PFT Supr. r. 11,128 2,293 13,421 Library: -3/4 PPT Librarian II (03) 17,360 3,531 20,891 _}PPT Sr. Library Clerk (01) 7,722 1,850 9,572 -j PPT Library Clerk (05) 8,425 1,940 10,365 j Senior Center: -Volunteer Spec. 20,519 4,478 24,997 Water: -Assistant Supt. 8,799 1,201 10,000 Equipment: -Shop Supervisor 25,720 3,910 29,630 -Parts Clerk 14,450 3.888 18,338 TOTAL 434,273 144.342 578.615 CHANGE IN LIBRARY PERSONNEL SINCE 1979 - Library reported no change in permanent full time positions. FY BUDGET $ FOR TEMP'S FTE 79 31,350 23 80 29,910 24 81 23,000 25.75 82 45,872 25.75 83 67,832 26.50 84 73,523 26.50 85 88,015 26.50 86 90,665 26.50 The change in full time equivalents may be due to changes in permanent part-time positions. I e. i / 7O Council Review Session for the FY86 Proposed Budget January 19, 1985 Informal Council Discussion: January 19, 1985, 8:00 a.m. in Room A at the Public Library. Mayor ohm McDonald presiding. Councilmembers Present: Erdahl, Zuber, Strait, Dickson, Ambrisco, Baker, McDonald a.m. . Staff Present: Berlin, Melling, Karr, Vitosh, Kimble and other staff at each presentation. Tape Recorded: Reel 85-C6, Side 2, 193 -End; 85-C1O, All; 85-C11, Side 1, 1-137. Economic Development: Reel 85-C6, Side 2 Berlin stated a policy to review economic development funding at the end of three years would be a good idea. Berlin said Huston will develop an overall program for Council review. Council agreed to fund the economic development as requested and to review the economic development program next year. Erdahl said the Council needs to discuss economic development issues that include the lottery and other state level funding at an informal discussion. In response to Zuber, Berlin said the Chamber of Commerce gives in-kind services, U of I pays one-quarter of Muston's salary and gives in-kind services, and the City gives in-kind services in addition to funding. Strait requested a cost estimate of the value of the in-kind services. Civil Rights (Alexander, Burnside, p. 170) Reel 85-C6, Side 2 Alexander said there are no major changes in the budget. Helling said the department will continue to operate at the current service level and the one-half time staff position funded by Type One HUD grant money will continue through the first half of this year. In response to Zuber, Alexander explained the housing audit will start in February and should be completed in May. Council will receive the results of the housing audit study in June. City Manager (Berlin, Vitosh, p. 33) Reel 85-C6, Side 2 Travel expenses were increased to include the City Management Association meeting and an executive management training session. Berlin will use administrative leave for the executive management training session. Vitosh explained that Mike Noth, from the University of Iowa Weeg Computer Center, is assisting with analyzing the City's microcomputer needs. There is $50,000 budgeted this year for microcomputers for various City departments. The police department has needs for a larger capacity system. $30,000 was budgeted in FY86 for the lease purchase of such a system for the Police Department and microcomputer purchases for other City departments. Through the use of microcomputers, the City hopes to increase productivity without hiring additional staff. Erdahl said the use of microcomputers and software needs to be monitored. Dickson said the microcomputers should be compatible with other City computer systems. Energy Conservation (Melling, Schoenfelder, p. 103) Reel 85-C6, Side 2 Helling introduced Jim Schoenfelder, the new Energy Coordinator. Plans are being developed to utilize the $67,000 Iowa -Illinois Gas 8 Electric Company refund. The refund may be used as matching funds to obtain federal and state funds from the Iowa Energy Policy Council. City Council will receive a report about the energy savings from the energy program and projections for future energy savings. In response to Strait, Vitosh explained that salaries are budgeted only at 98% and are adjusted in May of each year. By budgeting salaries this way the City was able to reduce the general fund by $200,000 the first year it was implemented. In response to Baker, Berlin explained Jansen will clarify his position in writing on the Iowa -Illinois Gas 8 Electric Company franchise agreement. Broadband Telecommunications (Shaffer, p. 42) Reel 85-C6, Side 2 Berlin reported that staff is researching the use of telecommunications in City government. Shaffer said that service levels will be the same as last year, major expenses are for personnel and equipment replacement, an intern- ship incentive program may need to be developed to assure a major source of labor, the School Board and Board of Supervisors would need to reimburse broadband telecommunications for cable broadcasting assistance, and the institutional network has been hooked up. The institutional network is hooked up to the Civic Center, Rec Center, Library, Courthouse, Old Brick, Mercy Hospital, Senior Center and two public schools and can be used in a variety of ways. In response to Strait, Kimble said the difference between the FY86 department request and administration proposal was because the administration expense was charged back for Legal Department and Assistant City Manager staff time. Equipment Maintenance Service (Reynolds, p. 299) Reel 85-C10, Side 1 Zuber inquired about the use of compressed natural gas. Reynolds explained that the natural gas compressor is not working correctly. Helling said Legal is researching if a reclaim can be made against the company. The compressor could be reconstructed and used as an air compressor. Helling noted that there is currently no substantial savings in using natural gas. Reynolds explained that Transit has had no problems with cracked anti -sway bars of the Neoplan buses. Transit is monitoring structural supports of those buses. City Clerk (Karr, p. 24) Reel 85-C10, Side I Karr reported that approximately 30 boxes of plats and project files have been microfilmed and that precautions are taken with the storage of the microfilm. Karr noted the new need for more microfilm storage and emphasized the need for more space. In response to Strait, Karr said the staff is researching utilizing the present reader/printer in conjunction with an automatic retrieval system. Both units will be put on a service maintenance contract. Berlin explained that a cost analysis of repairs and maintenance of equipment was done and. the City has a service maintenance contract for typewriters. Strait said it is sometimes more cost effective to not have the service maintenance contracts. z y Planning 8 Program Development Department (Schmeiser, Hencin, Lundell, Franklin Reel 85-C10, Side 1 pp. 75, 80, 270, 286) Schmeiser distributed a summary sheet of the Planning and Program Development Department budget. Schmeiser said increases in transportation and human services planning departments were due to the cost of utilities and building rental being distributed over the various programs and also charged to Johnson County and Coralville. Schmeiser emphasized the need for partitions as noted in the expanded service level requests. Schmeiser said that two Associate Planner positions, for economic development and advanced planning activities, have been filled. The economic development planner monitors the urban renewal projects and assists the community with commercial and indus- trial development. Ambrisco encouraged the Planning and Program Development Department to cooperate with local business interests due to the unusual number of vacancies in the downtown area. Erdahl said Zuchelli should be given vacancy and downtown business information for their study. Zuber inquired about the difference between the estimated and actual FY84 receipt and expenditure figures. Vitosh explained that the difference was due to the Zuchelli consulting fees and the budget was amended to reflect those costs. Finance (Vitosh, pp. 48, 52, 56, 59, 63, 66, 211) Reel 85-C10, Side 1 Administration. Vitosh said that the financial department's budget totals 1.1 mi ion when transfers out of the general fund and insurance premiums are excluded. There is an expanded service request in administration for an Assistant Finance Director. Vitosh explained that problems in the Treasury department were resolved by implementing a change in the physical layout of that division. The changes have greatly improved customer service. Berlin noted that the workload and number of shutoff notices of the Treasury department has increased. Zuber said another create additional position. Ambrisco Financial Director Vitosh. half-time person to work with interest investments would revenues and cover the cost of that additional staff said the expanded service level request for an Assistant is needed to assure staff coverage in the absence of In response to McDonald, Vitosh said the utility billing/apartment owners program is working well. Deposit amounts were increased and the Treasury department is monitoring losses. Vitosh explained that parking ticket revenues could be increased with a program with Johnson County where vehicle license registration would not be renewed unless parking tickets are paid. Staff is currently working with the County for such a program. In response to Baker, Vitosh said the hotel is meeting their profit estimations although parking figures from hotel usage has been decreasing. Berlin explained that revenue from the hotel to the City is based on UDAG payback. Accounting. The budget includes the second one-half of the computer upgrade whip 77l enable the City to add applications including a property file. Vitosh said the data processing staff position has not been filled due to space constraints. Word Processing. Capital outlay cen ra is a ion system which is inquired about the use of safety screen filters that reduce glare breaks away from the screens. for $8,800 is for the replacement of the used by all departments in the City. Erdahl screens. Vitosh is researching the use of and filter out radiation and staff is given Risk Management. A 15% increase in insurance premiums is projected. Vitosh said a ig er deductible may be more cost beneficial for the City and the City may consider hiring another Assistant City Attorney to work on claims that would normally be processed by an insurance company. Currently the City has first dollar coverage in a retro plan so the City receives a refund if losses are low. Ambrisco suggested that the legislative committee work to get legislation that would limit the liability of cities. Pa__rk'n . The actual number of hours of parking at parking ramps cannot be �fned because of the new variable rates, 351 for the first hour and 30E for additional hours of parking. Revenue is used as a performance measure. The conversion of parking meters to new rates will begin soon. Changes in the budget reflect additions for personnel to staff parking ramps. In response to McDonald, Vitosh said there is better communication between the hotel and parking ramp staff and the Police Department assists with traffic control when a large number of cars are leaving the ramps. Public Works Schma a e, Farmer, Stockman, Brachtel, Kron, Reel 85-C10, Side 2 Boren, pp. 96, 91, 108, 111, 219, 228, 237, 243) Administration. Schmadeke said Public Works will maintain services at the current level, expand services to meet the demands of growth in Iowa City, and modify operations that are necessary to meet state and federal require- ments. Schmadeke explained that the personnel increase is for a full-time secretary; work is being monitored at the Iowa Avenue bridge; the chipseal program is successful and can extend the life of asphalt pavement 3-5 years; Metcalf & Eddy have submitted a preliminary waste treatment plant study that summarizes 13 alternatives. Schmadeke emphasized the need for two employees in the Streets department. Stockman said that Street department employees assist with refuse collection. In response to Ambrisco, Schmadeke said staff has been in contact with the resident north of the new water storage tank and explained how the City will accommodate the runoff in that area. Berlin noted that landscape plans have been developed for the area surrounding the new water storage tank. In response to Baker, Kron said that the breakdown of carbon equipment machines has affected the taste of drinking water. New equipment has been ordered. City Attorney (Jansen, p. 28) Reel 85-C10, Side 2 Jansen said the budget is tentative until decisions are made about the new City Attorney's position and a third Assistant City Attorney has not been budgeted for. The FY86 budget is based on last year's budget with increases for professional services. Jansen said the workload merits a third Assistant City Attorney, particularly if the insurance program for the City is changed. McDonald said a recommendation from the City Attorney selection committee will be made by the end of January. I-V i— i 5 Human_ Relations (Carroll, p. 36) Reel 85-C11, Side 1 The budget is unchanged from previous years except for expanded service level requests. Carroll reviewed the in-house training program, employee assis- tance program, and the wellness programs. Carroll emphasized the need for the expanded service level request for the half-time personnel generalist position in the Human Relations Department and a secretary's position in the Fire Department. Capital Improvements Program The Mayor announced that Council will hold an informal session to discuss CIP's on February 4th at 6:30 p.m. 1 i 5 Human_ Relations (Carroll, p. 36) Reel 85-C11, Side 1 The budget is unchanged from previous years except for expanded service level requests. Carroll reviewed the in-house training program, employee assis- tance program, and the wellness programs. Carroll emphasized the need for the expanded service level request for the half-time personnel generalist position in the Human Relations Department and a secretary's position in the Fire Department. Capital Improvements Program The Mayor announced that Council will hold an informal session to discuss CIP's on February 4th at 6:30 p.m.