Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1985-04-02 Info Packet
City of Iowa City MEMORANDUM DATE: March 29, 1985 T0: City Council FROM: Assistant City Manager RE: Schedule for Informal Meeting REMINDER Your informal meeting is scheduled to begin at 6:00 P.M. on Tuesday, April 2, 1985, with a tour of the Sidewalk Special Assessment Program sites and the newly remodeled Nelson Adult Center. You will recall that the Nelson Adult Center project was recently completed and partially funded with COBG money. Council was recently invited to tour the facility. Transportation will be furnished by Iowa City Transit, and the bus will leave the Civic Center at 6:00 P.M. The building will be open at 5:45 P.M. Please notify me or Lorraine if you will not be able to go on the tour. N 53.5 City of Iowa City MEMORANDUM DATE: March 29, 1985 TO: City Council FROM: City Manager RE: Informal Agendas and Meeting Schedule April 2 1985 Tuesday 6:00 - 8:15 P.M. Council Chambers 6:00 P.M. - Tour Sidewalk Special Assessment Program Area 6:30 P.M. - Tour Nelson Adult Center 7:00 P.M. - Special Council Meeting (Separate agenda posted) j 7:05 P.M. - Street Naming Policy 7:20 P.M. - Sidewalk Assessment Program 7:35 P.M. - Transit Fare Subsidy Program 7:50 P.M. - Council Summer Meeting Schedule B:00 P.M. - Council time, Council committee reports April B 1985 Monday 6:30 - 8:30 P.M. Council Chambers 6:30 P.M. - Review zoning matters 6:50 P.M. - Weeber/Harlocke Area Rezoning 7:30 P.M. - Redevelopment Proposal: Parcel 65-2b (Minipark) 7:45 P.M. - Notice regarding tree removal 8:00 P.M. - Council agenda, Council time, Council committee reports 8:15 P.M. - Consider appointments to the Committee on Community Needs, Housing Commission, and Planning and Zoning Commission April 9 1985 Tuesda 7:30 P.M. - Regular Council Meeting - Council Chambers April 16 1985 Tuesda 6:30 - 8:30 P.M. Council Chambers 6:30 P.M. - Parcel 64-1a: Development Options 7:30 P.M. - Administrative Code (Iowa Theatre Type Problems) 8:15 P.M. - Council time, Council committee reports PENDING LIST Priority B: Leasing of Airport Land for Commercial Use Congregate Housing Development Alternatives (June 1985) Housing Alternatives Newspaper Vending Machines t Unrelated Roomers - Proposed Zoning Ordinance Amendment City Plaza Fountain Barrier Comprehensive Economic Development Program Housing Inspection Process and Operating Policies (April 1985) Liquor/Beer License Suspension Policy Sewer Tap -on Fees and Requirements Kirkwood/Dodge Signalization and Traffic Patterns Fees for Sign Permits Parking - Maiden Lane (April 22, 1985) ,536 City of Iowa City MEMORANDUM Date: March 29, 1985 To: City Council From: Neal Berlin Re: City Nomination for HUD/SBA Economic Development Assistance The City staff has prepared the forms necessary for nomination of Iowa City to receive economic development assistance from a joint program of the Department of Housing and Urban Development and the Small Business Admini- stration. This program provides technical assistance to selected Community Development Block Grant (COBG) Entitlement communities for CDBG-eligible activities involving economic development or small business assistance. Background of HUD/SBA Program In October of 1983, HUD and SBA entered into a three year agreement to assist 50 CDBG Entitlement communities. The Match Institution of Washington, D.C., a consulting firm with over 15 years of experience in community and economic development, urban and regional planning, marketing and finance, policy analysis and public administration, was selected to coordinate and deliver assistance to these 50 communities in three rounds of 13-17 communities per round. During the first round, which is scheduled to be completed by 'the end of March, 15 communities are receiving assistance for a wide variety of activi- ties. Cost of Technical Assistance Communities receiving assistance under this program share part of the total cost with the sponsoring agencies. CDBG funds may be used to pay the community's share. HUD and SBR pay all overhead and administrative costs related to planning, developing, delivering, and documenting the assistance. The HUD/SBA share will average over $9,000 per participating community, and includes the cost of: 1. Analyzing the feasibility of proposed projects; 2. Developing a written Technical Assistance Work Plan which defines specific objectives to be accomplished during delivery of technical assistance, establishes a schedule for completion of these objectives, and specifies the costs involved; 3. Selecting an economic development expert with the skills needed to move the proposed project forward; 4. Coordinating delivery of on-site assistance with the development expert and, where possible, local HUD and SBA Field Office representatives; and 5. Preparing a summary of the assistance provided and a blueprint for successful completion or continuation of the project in the future. 997 3 Participating communities pay the fees and expenses of the development expert and, in some cases, the travel subsistence expenses of an on-site coordinator from Match. During the first round of this program, the community's share averaged $3,800. Nominations for Second Round The nomination for this program is not in itself a commitment to incur costs. After nominations are evaluated by Match and final selections made by HUD and SBA, Match will submit to each selected community a Memorandum of Agreement stating the community's commitment to participate on a shared -cost basis. However, the Memorandum of Agreement will not be effective until and unless (1) Match prepares, and the community approves, a detailed Technical Assis- tance Work Plan and proposed budget, and (2) Match recommends, and the community accepts, a development expert with requisite specialized skills. Only after the community approves the work plan and proposed budget, and accepts the expert selected to deliver the assistance, does the community incur a financial obligation by signing the Technical Assistance Work Plan and returning it to Match. Projects Proposed in Iowa City's Nomination The City staff, in conjunction with First Capitol Development, Inc., has outlined two projects that could benefit by technical assistance from this program. These are listed on the attached sheet. Although two projects are listed, only one is likely to be selected for assistance. In the past round, this program concentrated on projects that could be completed in a relatively short time and which could overcome some obstacle or provide some impetus for the community to make additional progress toward economic development. The projects listed for Iowa City were chosen with these constraints in mind and also with consideration of priorities as revealed through past Council discussions. Nominations are due April 1, after which about four to six weeks will be required for their evaluation. After that time, the City will be notified if the community has been selected to receive assistance. cc: Committee on Community Needs Ray Huston pc/sp 5-37 The Iowa City community has two economic development projects underway which could be substantially strengthened through the technical assistance program. Both projects have high priority in the community and the order below does not imply preference. Selection of either of these projects to receive assistance will be welcomed. Project: Integrated Strategy for Area Economic Development A. The First Capitol Development, Inc., a not-for-profit economic development organization, represents the beginning of an area development program integrating the concerns and efforts of Iowa City, Coralville, Johnson County governments and municipalities, the University of Iowa and local business leaders. A coalition of leadership has been established and an analysis of strengths and areas for improvement has been conducted. Assistance in facilitating the next step in cooperative planning and development would be helpful, including future perspectives for joint planning, zoning and infrastructure development. An integrated strategy for area development can prove to be a very positive force in future development activities of all constituent organizations. B. As a part of the area economic development strategy, the City of Iowa City is in need of specific expert assistance in developing targeted economic development strategies for attracting new business and supporting existing business, based on the policy guidelines outlined in the Iowa City Comprehensive Plan (at- tached). The City has played a major role in the organization and support of First Capitol Development, Inc. (FCDI), and the City Council has made the formulation of an economic development plan a high priority for this fiscal year. Outside technical assistance is particularly timely given the Council's goal to establish an economic development plan during this year. The assistance would also give FCOI needed impetus in focusing its efforts on an area -wide strategy. Although the time frame is short, it is evidence of momentum in the community and intent by the City Council to take definite steps to encourage economic development. Project: Clear Creek Office/Research Park Project Local developers have acquired 350 acres for future development as a high-tech office/research park. The site is strategically located close to the Interstate and within minutes of the University of Iowa research and health care complex. The City has taken preliminary steps to work with the developers on provision of essential infra- structure for the site. The project has reached the stage where assistance is needed in developing and implementing a comprehensive development and marketing strategy for the community high-tech site. Next steps should also include establishing network relationships with potential "lead corporations" which might serve as a nucleus for the park. Assistance with the marketing strategy would enable the community to take advantage of its university, community and site resources for future economic development. 537 i City of Iowa City MEMORANDUM Date: March 27, 1985 To: City Council From: Dale Helling, Assistant City Manager Re: 1985 Sumner Meeting Schedule Attached please find a calendar for the months of May through September, 1985. The dates circled are those on which Council will have Monday evening informal meetings and regular Tuesday formal meetings under the current meeting schedule. This schedule in no way interferes with any of the summer holidays. In the past Council has not scheduled informal meetings on the off week during the summer. If you wish to continue this practice, I recommend that your meeting schedule for this summer be according to the attached. You would have the option of scheduling informal meetings on the off -Tuesdays if needed. If Council concurs with the above, your summer schedule would begin after yyour regular informal and regular on Mformal meetischedule on September9land ould resume with 1O. This matter is scheduled for discussion at your informal meeting on .April 2, 1985. bj3/5 W7 M A Y I U L Y City of Iowa City MEMORANDUM TO: City Council FROM: Assistant City Manager RE: Summer Meeting Schedule for 1985 S M T W T F 5 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 SAM) 22 23 8 9 1011 4 12 13 15 16 17 18 4 19 co 13 22 23 24 25 126127128129130131 18 19 20 21 B 22 Memorial Day - May 27 28 5 M T W M Q Q 3 7 8 9 10 14© 17 21 22 23 24 T F 5 4 5 6 11 1213 18 19 20 25 26 27 128 9 0 311 Independence Day - July 4 I U N E A U G U S T DATE: March 29, 1985 5 M T W T F S 1 2 Q® 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 19 20 21 22 Z3 o 24 25 26 27 28 29 S M T W T F S 1 2 3 45 6 7 8 9 10 11 2 3 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 28 29 30 31 5 5 M T W T F S E P 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 T 8®11 12 13 14 E M 15 16 1 18 19 20 21 B 22 25 26 27 28 29 30 R Labor Day - September 2 53p City of Iowa City MEMORANDUM Date: March 28, 1985 To: CityCo i From: Don S / Director of Planning & Program Development Re: Street Naming Policy For your information prior to next week's consideration of street naming, following is a discussion of the street naming policies implemented by the City since 1974 and before. Every street in the city has a name and every street name has two parts to its name. The first part of a street name (and in some cases in combination with the second part) is what gives every street in the city identity. Such names as Washington, Dubuque and Burlington are names of the first part. The second part of a street name is intended to identify the type of street it is. The words drive, avenue and court are names which should signify to. the public whether a street is, for example, a cul-de-sac or a through street. Since at least 1974, the City has not been particularly concerned about the first part of street names; it has been felt that this part of a street name was the prerogative of the subdivider to establish. The City did, however, ensure that street names did not duplicate other street names within Iowa City or Coralville, did not sound like other street names, or did not in some manner appear inappropriate. Prior to 1974, there were at times different policies, formal or informal, established in regard to the first part of street names. In particular, it was felt that certain sections of the community could be more readily identified by requiring the first part of street names to be established according to some theme. For example, many of the streets in southeast Iowa City have street names related to the movie industry. Hollywood Boulevard, Tracy Lane, Crosby Lane, and Davis Street are but a few streets which were required to be named in a way which is characteristic of the movie industry. In other examples, themes included the states of this country or horticul- tural terms. Whether required or not, some of the oldest streets in the community are named with a central theme in mind. Such streets as Dubuque, Burlington and Muscatine are streets which were named after other cities in Iowa. Since 1974, it has been the informal policy that the second part of street names be established according to the attached street naming classification plan. With only a few exceptions, streets with an east -west orientation were required to be named avenues, north -south streets were required to be named streets, streets which travel in both an east -west and north -south direction are named drives, and streets less than 1000 feet in length are named courts, lanes, etc. It has been felt that the second part of a street name would provide notice to particularly new residents and visitors of the direction of a street and whether it is a through street. 539 2 There are, of course, some street names established prior to 1974 that are inconsistent with the street naming classification plan. Holt Avenue, for example, runs north -south and Downey Drive is a cul-de-sac less than 1000 feet in length. There apparently was no requirement for the second part of street names prior to 1974. Regardless, for those persons unfamiliar with the street names in Iowa City, they seemingly can identify with the street names for newer subdivisions in the community. Whatever action the Council decides to take in the naming of streets, the staff would recommend that you establish a formal policy by resolution. The staff will be present to discuss the matter at your informal meeting, an d if you have any questions in regard to this matter prior to the meeting, please do not hesitate to contact me at 356-5230. bj4/9 i 0 S LA n` CIRCLE W LESS THAN 1,000' V Q N . H 3 AVENUES 5 0 n P NORTH W o5 W P o � 0 z h � A5 0g AVENUES COURTS LESS THAN 1,000, SOUTH 1— N Q W 539 m City of Iowa City MEMORANDUM Date: March 25, 1985 To: City Counc W,11 jnbers From: Don Schmei¢E�,{�Director, PPD Re: 1985 CDBG 'Sidewalk Installation and Repair Project An element of the 1985 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program, approved by the Council on November 20, 1984, is the installation and repair of sidewalks in the Creekside Neighborhood. An allocation of $23,200 was made to construct sidewalks on Seventh Avenue Court from Seventh Avenue to Creekside Park and on the north side of Muscatine Avenue from Garden Street to Fifth Avenue. A portion of an existing sidewalk on the south side of Muscatine Avenue between Rundell and Dearborn Streets is also scheduled to be repaired. In January, 1985, letters were sent to residents on Muscatine Avenue and Seventh Avenue Court informing them of the proposal to construct sidewalks adjacent to their property. Along with the letters, questionnaires were sent to determine the income eligibility of the neighborhoods and to assess residents' interest in the construction of sidewalks within their blocks. The results of these surveys indicate that the residents are not interested in sidewalks. Winter maintenance of the walks was often cited-is—the reason for their disinterest. As an alternative, surveys were mailed to Creekside residents with property fronting the north side of Jackson Avenue from Rundell Street to Seventh Avenue and to residents with property on the north side of G Street from Fourth Avenue to Third Avenue. These two blocks are additional Creekside sites at which sidewalks presently do not exist. The survey results reveal that Jackson Avenue neighbors, too, do not want a sidewalk. Of three households receiving the G Street survey, one family responded enthusiastic- ally in favor of a sidewalk and responses were not received from the other two households. The following table sumnarizes the results of the surveys and the attached map identifies the four neighborhoods which have been surveyed: NO. SURVEYS MAILED RESPONSE Install Do Not Install No Sidewalk Sidewalk Reply Seventh Avenue Court 11 1 14 2 Muscatine Avenue 10 2 5 3 Jackson Avenue 4 1 3 0 G Street 3 1 0 2 At its February 19, 1985, meeting, the Committee on Community Needs (CCN) discussed the question of selecting alternate sidewalk sites within the Creekside neighborhood and concluded that the sidewalk sites originally ..S7ti selected were chosen based on their benefit to pedestrians within the entire neighborhood rather than solely on their merits to residents living adjacent to the new walks. CCN members commented that the sites selected would serve as valuable pedestrian links to area parks and schools and would, therefore, be worthwhile comounit resources. The Committee recommended that the original plan of the sidewalk project be upheld and that Seventh Avenue Court and Muscatine Avenue residents be notified accordingly. As a result, letters have been mailed to Seventh Avenue Court and Muscatine Avenue residents informing them of CCN's support of the recommendation to construct sidewalks along these blocks. Residents were also informed of the o ptheuplanstandcomment pecifications for the osed sidewalkects s inthe theseme a areasuisiheldaring Letters were also mailed to Jackson Avenue and G Street Residents to notify them of the survey results and to apprise them that, unless residents living in those two blocks specifically request that CDBG funds be used to construct sidewalks along those streets, walks will not be installed at the present time. They were also informed that if, at a later date, the City receives requests for sidewalks in the proposed Jackson Avenue and G Street locations, toweachmpr pertysownerdbut with landhie cadjacent of thtoethesnewlsidewalksons would be assessed This status report is brought e do to hesitate ttonfor contact minformation. at 56 -5232 or Jim have any questions, pleas Hencin, CDBG Coordinator, at 356-5244. cc: Chuck Schmadeke, Director, Public Works Department Jim Hencin, CDBG Program Coordinator bj4/1 RZO R E K S I D E LEGEND Iowa �..�� PROJECT BOUNDARY i IT ............. PROPOSED.... SIDEWALK e IMPROVEMENTS ••- =: RALSTON CREEK IMPROVEMENTS i city of Iowa city MEMORANDUM DATE: March 29, 1985 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Frank Farmer, City Engineer RE: Sidewalk Assessment Project The attached plats, for reference during April 2, 1985 bus tour, mark the location of the sidewalks included in the FY86 Sidewalk Assessment Project. Approximately 25% of the property owners have indicated that they intend to have their walk installed prior to the assessment project. The property owners along Friendship Street have submitted a petition objecting to the Sidewalk Assessment Project. In addition, the property owner at 7th and Sheridan objected to the sidewalk and the property owner at the W corner of Rochester Avenue and Pleasant Street expressed concern with placing sidewalk along the west side of Pleasant Street because of its potential damage to a very large Colorado Blue Spruce tree. 1 �-1 'L, I_I IOWA seri ST. U:� BLOOMINGTON STREET SIDEWALK & PLEASANT STREET SIDEWALK RE GINA HIGH SCHOOL IOWA CITY HIGH SCHOOL Hoo"[ I iCH00L rq- FRIENDSHIP STREET SIDEWA 1 lit REGINA HIGH SCHOOL IOWA CITY HIGH SCHOOL Hoo•[ ROCHESTER AVENUE & POST ROAD SIDEWALKS I' {-\., 'moo ,.�,_ •:., y/` :, , , ; • .. I •® - r�`r-r r_ L� T' m F7 r;r , City of Iowa City MEMORANDUM Date: March 25, 1985 To: City Council and City Manager From: Frank Farmer, City Engineer 95N. Re: Dubuque Street (Northbound) from Kimball Road to Ridge Road The City Council has requested Engineering to investigate the possibility of installing a curb and gutter section along with necessary storm sewer on that portion of northbound Dubuque Street between Kimball Road and Ridge Road. Portions of Dubuque Street north and southbound from Kimball Road to I-80 consist of a rural section, that is, curb and gutter does not exist and storm water drainage is directed to the ditch and or median adjacent to the road. Where curb and gutter does exist, stone water is directed to the gutter and then into storm intakes. After preliminary review it has been determined that curb and gutter along with necessary storm intakes, asphalt overlay, and grading of the parking area could be added to Dubuque Street (northbound) from Kimball Road to Ridge Road and still maintain adequate storm water drainage. The esti- mated cost for this project is $78,000. tpl/1 .s1/z City of Iowa City MEMORANDUM Bate: March 29, 1985 To: Neal Berlin, City Manager From: Larry McGonagle, Transit Manager Re: Project Hard Times - Transit Fare Subsidy This program began in September, 1983, after Council had been contacted by a citizen requesting that individuals be allowed to use their food stamp cards for free bus transportation, and that the unemployed be allowed to ride free. During the summer of 1983 unemployment throughout the nation was extremely high and was very much in the news, although unemployment in Johnson County was approximately 2%. Council ultimately decided to provide free bus tickets through Job Services to those looking for work. The maximum number of tickets given out at one time by Job Service is three, one to be used to go to the interview; one to return home; and one to return to Job Services. Council's decision to limit the program was based on two reasons. First, to allow food stamp recipients and unemployed individuals to ride free would be extremely costly and difficult to manage because a large percentage of our student population falls into one of the two categories. Secondly, Council felt strongly that the City should not provide social services as there already existed a number of agencies to provide assistance for those unemployed or receiving other assistance. Since the inception of this program in September, 1983, through February, 1985, 2,233 tickets have been used. Average monthly ridership is approxi- mately 124 and the average weekday ridership is approximately 8 per day. There has been a substantial increase in the averages in the last six months. In the last six months the monthly average is 208, with a weekday average of 11. At a cost of 40 cents per ticket, the entire program has cost $893.20. There has been a request to expand the present program. To do so could greatly increase the cost of the program. It would cost several thousand dollars per year if all unemployed and those receiving other types of assistance are included. As with any program, the larger it becomes the more costly it is to administer. At present the program takes little staff time and has virtually no administrative cost. If the program were expanded, eligibility guidelines would be needed and someone would have to be responsi- ble for distributing the tickets and ensuring proper use and continued eligi- bility. This program is currently active. Council was to review it at the end of FY85. However, due to the opening of the new transit facility and acquisi- tion of new coaches, this matter was overlooked and not brought to your attention. I regret the oversight and recommend this program be reviewed on an annual basis. JT✓ 2 I believe the current program is working well and is meeting the needs of those it is intended to serve. However, the direct cost in lost fares as well as administrative costs for an expanded program should be carefully considered if any expansion of the program is contemplated. by recommenda- tion is to maintain the program as it currently exists. /sp ,5'i�3 CITY OF IOWA CIVIC CENTER 410 E. WASHINGTON ST IOWA CITY. IOWA 52240 March 28, 1985 The Honorable Jean Lloyd -Jones Representative (46th District) State House Des Moines, Iowa 50319 Dear Ms. Lloyd -Jones: CITY (319) 356-5CM Same letter to Representative Minnette Doderer with copy to Senator Art Small. This letter is in response to your request for additional information regarding the position of the City of Iowa City on S.F. 364, a bill expanding the scope of negotiations under the current collective bar- gaining statute and providing for certain other modifications of that statute. I shall restrict my comments to those provisions which relate only to public employer and employee organizations and not those which apply to "certified" employees (school employees) as defined in S.F. 364. There are several reasons why this bill should be opposed. Briefly these are as follows: First, this legislation broadens the scope of mandatory bargaining to a point which very nearly approaches the "open scope" concept. Chapter 20.9 of the Code of Iowa lists 18 mandatory topics for collective bargaining. The proposed legislation adds 18 additional topics while deleting one (fob descriptions) from the current law. This obviously is not characterized as the addition of "a few" topics. The size of the list is doubled and a large portion of those issues which traditionally fall within the realm of "other conditions of employment" or "open scope" are included. Such broadening of the scope of bargaining is neither necessary nor desirable. The present system is working well. Public employees are able to bargain for wages, benefits, safety concerns, fair employment prac- tices, and other issues of vital concern to them while public employers retain their rights to establish which services will be provided, and at what level, in the community. This delicate balance between bargainable issues and traditional management rights was recognized by the legislature when the collective bargaining law was adopted and it remains critical to continued equity and effectiveness in the public sector collective bargaining process. S.F. 364 clearly destroys this balance in favor of the employee organization. Second, while it is recognized that no employer is required to agree on any of these issues, the process allows for third party intervention at the prerogative of either party, in the form of binding arbitration. Our experience has been that fact finders and arbitrators do not always appear to understand or consider the impact of their decisions on the need for local policymaking bodies to determine how and under what circumstances local services are provided. Adding to the list of negotiable topics such .S 54 Page 2 things as fitness standards, evaluation remediation, criteria for staff reduction, discipline and discharge, and minimum equipment and staffing levels, greatly enhances the possibility of these local policy determina- tions being surrendered to a third party who has no direct responsibility for the impact of his/her decisions, especially the financial impact upon local taxpayers. Third, the purpose and intent of this legislation is made obvious, I believe, by the provision which states, "Section 20.7 does not apply to the subjects of bargaining contained in subsections 1 and 2." Section 20.7, entitled "Public Employer Rights" is thus superseded during the bargaining process. It requires the public employer to bargain even its stated rights and is obviously recognized by its authors and supporters as doing exactly that. This provision is totally inconsistent with the entire concept of employers' rights as a necessary tool to ensure effec- tive and efficient operations and delivery of services. Finally, this bill proposes adding additional language which states, "Existing provisions of a collective bargaining agreement which is the subject of negotiation shall not be eliminated from a subsequent agreement without the mutual consent of the parties to the agreement." The effect of this sentence is that any provisions existing in any current contract which are not mandatory topics for bargaining nevertheless become manda- tory in that they cannot be removed from a contract except by negotiation. Additions to the list of mandatory topics, along with a comment on the City's position on each, are addressed more specifically as follows: 1. Salary schedule - This item is currently included under the topic of wages. This addition is not necessary. The redundancy can only result in interpretative confusion. 2. Credit for compensatory time - It appears that this topic is mandatory under the current statute as it relates to wages and hours. Under a recent U.S. Supreme Court (Garcia) decision the issue may be moot, for only monetary compensation for overtime worked may be permitted. 3. Supplemental (pay and) benefits - This is a broad term which would appear to encompass all benefits not otherwise included in the list of mandatory items. A broad interpretation would include anything which conceivably might be characterized as a "benefit". This is in direct conflict with the purpose and intent of limiting and clearly defining mandatory items. 4. Allowances and reimbursements for necessary costs incurred in employ- ment - This again represents a very broad category, subject to wide interpretation,and again in conflict with the purpose of a limited list. It is conceivable that this could be construed to include meals while on duty or certain articles of clothing not part of the standard uniform, for example. 5. Secondary employment - This could result in employees being allowed to engage in secondary employment which directly conflicts with the interest of the public employer or which interferes with the em- ployee's ability to perform satisfactorily in his or her public employment. ,77 Page 3 5. Break or preparation time - While we currently negotiate break time as a benefit, preparation time which is necessary for the employee to assume his or her employment responsibilities should not be nego- tiable. This could conceivably include the time required for a person to put on a uniform or other such preparation which an employee is normally expected to do on his or her own time in order to be ready to assume his or her specific duties. Legitimate issues here would seem to relate to wages and hours which are currently mandatory topics. 1. Physical examination and fitness standards for an employee's continued employment and job assignment - It should remain the employer's right to determine the standards under which an employee may continue in employment. Employers are constantly held responsible for maintaining certain standards. State legislation which presumes that a cardiac or respiratory related disability is automatically job related for public safety personnel has prompted many public employers to look seriously at more stringent physical fitness requirements in those areas of employment. The State thus makes the public employer legally respon- sible for any cardiac or respiratory related disability regardless of possible non -job related causes. Now it would require that same employer to negotiate any fitness standards by which it might hope to control rapidly rising costs of related medical treatment and early disability retirement. In addition, it might be possible for employee organizations to negotiate fitness standards which might be discrimi- natory. It is imperative that employers, who are held completely responsible for Equal Employment Opportunity, not have to negotiate such standards with others who are not similarly accountable. 8, Life and health insurance premiums for present employees when retired - These benefits, along with others, should be negotiable only for current employees. Premiums for these types of insurance customarily increase substantially for retired persons and providing these benefits could be extremely costly to public employers. We agree with the legislature which saw fit to specifically exempt retirement benefits when formulating this statute and we take special exception to the proposed deletion of that exemption (Section 20.9, third para- graph). 9. Evaluation (procedures and) remediation - This suggests that perform- ance criteria for remediation of a poor performance evaluation would become negotiable. It should remain the absolute right of the employer to determine performance standards in all areas of employ- ment, to evaluate such performance, and to determine what level of performance continually satisfies these standards. 10. Promotion procedures - Procedures for evaluating employees for promotion may vary significantly depending upon the nature of the promotional position. While it is absolutely necessary that promotion procedures be uniform for all those tested for a specific position, the actual procedures employed should not be negotiable. Negotiation of these procedures could effectively prevent management from imple- menting fair and effective procedures. In addition, this would create another area of potential conflict with civil service law which now prescribes certain promotional testing procedures. Page 4 11. (Transfers and) criteria (for staff reduction) and recall - Procedures for staff reduction should be uniform and we have no objection to negotiating these as is currently provided. Generally these will include some reference to recall as well. The principal objection here is to the inclusion of "criteria". A public employer may find it necessary to reduce staffing for a wide variety of legitimate reasons, all of which certainly cannot be anticipated in a collective bargain- ing agreement. In addition, such necessity can properly be determined only by the local administration and policy makers who are responsible for determining which services and what level of service will be provided to the local community. This is an area which should not be within the scope of negotiations. 12. Discipline and discharge - While many contracts currently include references to progressive discipline, it should remain an absolute management right to determine under what conditions disciplinary measures, including discharge, will occur. Sufficient recourse is now provided through civil service law, equal employment opportunity remedies, and other civil legal processes for employees who feel they are inappropriately disciplined or discharged. 13. (Health and safety matters) including minimum equipment and staffing - Again there is no objection to negotiating matters which legitimately can be characterized as "health and safety matters". The courts have consistently interpreted such matters to be those which only relate directly to the health and safety of an employee. It is not appro- pri�—for the bargaining process to include either minimum equipment or staffing of that equipment as this again relates to the question of what level of service is demanded by, and will be provided for, the, citizens of an individual community. 14. Pay for unused sick leave upon separation - Iowa City has recently negotiated this clause out of all three labor contracts. It was originally intended to deter the abuse of sick leave. However, it appears to be a very expensive mechanism which does not work. Through approximately 10 years of providing this benefit, we find that employees continue to use approximately 50% of accrued leave on the average. This and other provisions which involve payment upon separation (resignation or retirement) fall into the category of severence pay or retirement benefits which we continue to oppose becoming mandatory negotiable items. 15. Separate grievance files - It remains imperative that an employer keep a complete record of any grievance. Future contract administration must be conducted according to the terms of any resolution and a record of such terms is critical to contract interpretation and future negotiations. Accurate, reliable record keeping should not be a negotiable topic. 16. Payroll deductions - Computerization of payroll records, etc., make it fairly easy for employers to effect payroll deductions and we have no objection to inclusion of this item as a mandatory topic. It would not seem to represent a financial burden for most communities. _61 Page 5 17. Training and education benefits - These items are currently negoti- ated, to some extent, within the categories of either health and safety or, in the area of premium pay or education benefits, wages. Inclusion of all training and all education benefits as mandatory topics could result in a third party unilaterally determining what training and education is required or desired as beneficial to the employer. 18. Early retirement incentive programs - Mandatory retirement criteria are established by state and federal law. In addition, employees are eligible for retirement under permanent, partial and total disability provisions. The addition of early retirement incentive programs would assume that early retirement is desirable within the organization. However, to define early retirement as desirable in certain areas or under certain conditions, and incentive programs for such earlto thus mandate that cities bargain are not legitimate within the coly retirement, makes assumptions which lective bargaining process. If it is deemed necessary to legislate some broadening of the scope of would iseem,totPoseems ntheeleasted ,signifi ant pr blems. white not desirable, I wish to stress that this proposed bill des not represent, by any means, o the addition of "a few" topics to the list of mandatory negotiations under Chapter 20. Rather, it appears to have been specifically and intention- ally drafted to considerably broaden the scope of bargaining in Iowa. It rights clearly recognized by and a theyoriginal'authors erodes to a ofethisxstatute hoass se necessarement yin e maintaining the delicate balance between the rights and obligations in citizen taxpayers as public employers on the one hand and those of thof e public employees on the other, it is Iowa City's opinion that no matter how this legislation is represented, it constitutes a serious encroachment on the prerogatives of the public policymaking body and the administrative rights and responsibilities of each political subdivision employer. I strongly urge you to consider this, to examine any proposed as a public legislation in this area very closely, and to support the concept of a limited and clearly defined scope of collective bargaining. Sincerely yours, John McDonald Mayor /sp cc: City Council �r� CITY OF CIVIC CENTER 410 E. WASHINGTON Sl March 22, 1985 The Honorable Arthur Small State Senator (23rd District) State House Des Moines, Iowa 50319 Bear Senator Small: OWA CITY IOWA CITY. IOWA 522,1( ) (319) 356!)U� Same ietter mailed to Representatives Jean Lloya-Jones and Hinnette Doderer. This information is provided as discussed at your meeting with the Legisla- tive Committee on March 16, 1985. Below is a list of several items before the legislature which the City would like to bring to your attention and upon which we have taken the following positions. The so-called "Tax Plan" bills of the House and Senate are still of greatest importance and interest to the City. I believe these were covered quite thoroughly in our meeting. Likewise, the collective bargaining legislation (S.F. 364) is of vital concern. You will receive a separate letter detailing our concerns about this bill. We are opposed to broadening the scope of negotiability. Several Civil Service issues before the Legislature should be resolved. S.F. 266 originally mandated that all cities have civil service systems and separate police and fire pension systems. These provisions have apparently been amended out of the bill. While such provisions would not directly affect Iowa City, it would represent a substantial cost burden for many smaller cities. We do strongly support the provision of this bill which would remove the absolute veterans' preference mandate in favor of a simple point advantage for veterans. I also call your attention to S.F. 238, the rewrite of the current Civil Service statute. While there is no indication that this legislation will progress during the current session, I wish to reiterate Iowa City's long standing position that this statute be updated to be consistent with, and not in conflict with, modern personnel procedures and collective bargaining contracts negotiated under the provision of Chapter 20. It certainly would be preferable to concentrate on this issue before amending the collective bargaining statute which does not now present nearly the problems as the antiquated civil service statute. S.F. 296 addresses the investment of public funds. This bill remedies problems created by the passage last session of S.F. 2220 which repealed the State sinking fund. The current legislation combines the concepts of sinking funds supported by financial institutions in conjunction with the pledging of collateral for public funds invested and it represents a more workable approach to guaranteeing the security of public funds while minimizing March 22, 1985 Page 2 exposure to financial institutions in the event of the collapse of one such institution. We support this bill, as introduced, including its provision for creating a privately managed investment fund and removal of geographic limitations for all city and county investments. H.F. 551 seems to represent the best of several proposed amendments to the "manufactured housing bill" from last session. This bill amends the defini- tion of manufactured home for city or county zoning purposes to mean a factory -built structure which is manufactured in compliance with the State Building Code requirements as a place of human habitation, but which is designed only for erection or installation on a site -built permanent founda- tion. This amendment would seem to eliminate problems from the previous legislation relating to the placement of mobile hones on a nearly unre- stricted basis. Amendments to last year's legislation regarding sidewalk liability have been introduced. S.F. 167 and H.F. 172 would remove specific references to "abutting property owner" liability and would also eliminate assignment of fault to an abutting property owner in the event of a tort claim. We believe ' that the legislation passed in the last session is both equitable and workable and we strongly encourage you to consider no further amendments, such as those above, which would render the liability question less clear and again create the kind of confusion and "deep pocket" situations the 1984 legislation was passed to eliminate. In addition to the above, there are several issues for which we encourage your favorable support. These include: 1. H.F. 403 regarding official publications - this would allow cities that have a daily newspaper and a licensed commercial radio station the option of printing a monthly pamphlet of the preceding month's Council meeting minutes and receipts and expenditures in lieu of publishing these items in the official newspaper. This option is now available only to cities of more than 150,000 population. This would provide a financial advan- tage for Iowa City. 2. H.F. 406 removes the dollar and population limits which restrict the authority of cities to institute proceedings to issue bonds for general corporate purposes without calling an election. Iowa City strongly supports this legislation, including the provision which allows for eligible electors to require an election on specific bond issues through the petition process. This would allow for a more expeditious use of the ofnthelcitizensttophavessuch ies ssues put before thalternative e votersle ifdesiredthe ights otor boat on 3, public5waterslwithinwthersome corporatecal limitsuoftaon of city,ncnoise contingent upon adoption of special rules by the State Conservation Commission. Iowa City has sought this authority in the past and the State Conservation commission has indicated interest in this concept. 4. H.F. 235 would empower local authorities to overrule Iowa Liquor Control Department rulings and to become the final authority in the event of the issuance of licenses or reduction of suspension or reinstatement of licenses after action to suspend or deny by the local authority has taken _6�4s March 22, 1985 Page 3 2. H.F. 342 would require minimum staffing of firefighting apparatus. This could result in substantial additional costs to have personnel available on a full-time basis to move all such equipment. It should remain an absolute right of the employer to assign duties and determine staffing levels in its operation. 3. H.F. 489 would establish a maximum of 40 hours for the work week of a firefighter. Again, this should be a matter of local determination in conjunction with the collective bargaining process. place. We have taken the position that either the local City Council should have the final authority or that these matters should be handled solely by the State Liquor Control Department. 5. S.F. 56 would allow cities and counties to establish a fine of up to $100 for violation of handicapped parking restrictions. Iowa City supports this provision. 6. H.F. 586 provides that officers and employees of units of local govern- ment are not liable for punitive damages unless actual malice is proven. This legislation eliminates the reference to willful, wanton and reckless misconduct and would concentrate on actual malice as the only criteria for local official liability. 7. N.F. 502 represents a remedy to legislation passed last year which requires psychological testing for applicants for law enforcement posi- tions. The current bill would require that such testing be given only to those applicants who have completed the recruitment and selection process i and would eliminate the necessity of expensive testing for applicants who may well be eliminated from consideration on the basis of other more basic criteria. This also relates to a current proposal by the Iowa Law Enforcement Academy to prescribe basic cognitive skills tests which would represent a cost to all Iowa cities of approximately $12 per applicant. The current cost to the City ranges from $1 to $1.25 per applicant. The State should provide financial resources for funding these increased i costs or not create such requirements. 8. H.F. 523 makes explicit a city's right to lease or lease -purchase real or personal property, and provides terms and procedures for the exercise of this option. This bill, as drafted, could be very advantageous to cities which are in need of additional facilities. Often the private sector, as lessor, has available certain financial advantages which can be passed onto to the city. These financial advantages may significantly exceed those which might otherwise accrue from the sale of bonds. Finally, I would like to call your attention to several pieces of legislation to which we are opposed. Many of these involve additional mandated costs for cities. Some examples are: 1. S.F. 301 requires all cities over 25,000 population to employ an Equal Employment Opportunity officer. In the case of Iowa City, this function is now performed by personnel in the Human Relations Department. It should remain a local function to determine what positions are needed for effective operations and therefore to be included as such in the overall employment classification plan. 2. H.F. 342 would require minimum staffing of firefighting apparatus. This could result in substantial additional costs to have personnel available on a full-time basis to move all such equipment. It should remain an absolute right of the employer to assign duties and determine staffing levels in its operation. 3. H.F. 489 would establish a maximum of 40 hours for the work week of a firefighter. Again, this should be a matter of local determination in conjunction with the collective bargaining process. March 22, 1985 Page 4 4. S.F. 385 would require payment by state governmental agencies of the "prevailing wage" (Davis -Bacon) for all public improvements over $2,000 in counties over 20,000 population. We are concerned that the substan- tial costs of this legislation might, in the future, be incurred by governmental subdivisions as well, if a future legislature takes the "next step" in applying this mandatory to all governmental units. 5. There are a multitude of bills which would increase the benefits of public employee pension systems and thereby result in an increase in the amount public employers must contribute to support those systems. We oppose any such legislation in the absence of State funding for increased costs at the local level. 6. S.F. 322 would provide for occupational safeguards for public employees operating video display terminals. While we would favor appropriate safeguards, this legislation provides for an extreme variety of "safe- guards," many to be provided at the employee's request, which could represent a substantial cost to the employer. Any legislation -in this area should be considered only after thorough research and analysis has been conducted to determine what safeguards are necessary and appropriate and such safeguards should then be mandatory for all affected employees. This particular bill does not meet these needs. We also oppose the provisions of S.F. 84 which would preempt a governmental subdivision from regulating firearms through restrictions more severe than those imposed by the State. Again, such legislation represents an erosion of Home Rule Authority. Thank you for your consideration relative to these concerns. Sincerely yours, John McDonald Mayor dh/sp cc: City Council CITY OF IOWA CITY CN/IC CENTER 410 E. WASHINGTON ST. IOWA CITY. IOWA 52240 (319) 356-5000 March 22, 1985 Mr. Bill Bywater, President Chamber of Commerce P.O. Box 2358 Iowa City, Iowa 52240 Dear Bill: The Legislative Committee of the Iowa City City Council recently met with our area legislators to discuss items of concern which are before the current State legislature. During that discussion, the subject of the recent Iowa City night was raised. Our legislators expressed very positive feelings toward this event. However there was discussion that it might be more beneficial to join with Cedar Rapids in sponsoring this event. There are two principal reasons for this. Iowa City and Cedar Rapids are in close proximity and have many related interests and concerns. We have joined with Cedar Rapids in our economic development efforts and will continue to promote the 'corridor" for industrial development. There is a daily "exchange" of residents for industrial, commercial, educational, and leisure time activities. Indeed, many people from around the state tend to regard Iowa City and Cedar Rapids as one major metropolitan area. In addition, a relatively large number of communities sponsor similar events for the legislators and they are increasingly inundated with invitations to these and to other types of activities. Given the above, I believe it would be beneficial to further consider the advantage of a jointly sponsored Iowa City/Cedar Rapids night during the next legislative session. I would be happy to further discuss this matter with you and to join you in meeting with Cedar Rapids officials to further explore this concept. i I look forward to hearing from you soon regarding this matter. incere ly yours, 0h McDonald I May cc: City Council;," Neal Berlin /sp —5" POLICE DEPARTMENT REPORT February, 1985 There was no significant change in the number or types of offenses reported by citizens to the Police Department com- paring February to January of this year. A total of 2,603 citizen generated requests for police service were received at the Police Department in February and 2,667 in January. Increases in reported offenses occurred in the following classifications: January February Assault 13 23 Larceny 108 160 Vandalism 44 77 Sex Offenses 11 22 Family/Children 41 49 Intoxication 22 36 Disorderly Conduct 207 240 Suspicion 42 69 Attempt to Locate 15 18 Parking 265 283 Most other classifications of reported offenses remained rela- tively constant or declined slightly. A total of one hundred seventy-nine criminal arrests were effected, including thirteen juvenile. Traffic violations increased to 553 in February as compared to the 422 in January. The number of traffic tickets dropped in February to 2448 from 2580 in January. The major case load of the Detective Division continued upward at a slow but steady pace. In addition, a tide of bad checks and an increase in fraudulent credit card transactions added to the case load. Two officers resigned in February with both positions almost immediately filled from the available Civil Service list. Two additional week-long training sessions were completed. One additional session will be completed in March, thus finish- ing the regularly scheduled in-service training program for City officers for this year. .>�7 n ANIMAL SHELTER MONTHLY REPORT MONTH FEBRUARY 19 85 This Month This Month This Year Last Year /1—+ vee.\ t. natp to nate Dog Complaints 53 69 122 117 Cat Complaints 9 12 28 20 Total Colain's 62 81 150 137 Impound ng Record Voluntary (Dogs) Pick Up (Dogs) Owner (Cats) I Stray (Cats) ICPD N/C 7 5 9 5 3 7 23 U U 0 Disposals Dogs Adopted Dogs Reclaimed Cats Adopted Cats Reclaimed 1 1 1 1 10 2 4 TRAPS 0 $60.00 120.00 $75.00 Pis 00 36.00 84.00 eii nn P. . Dogs P.T.S. Cats 14 42 28 11 27 19 Revenue in o ars Acceptance fees Adoptions Deposits DONATIONS Rabie Shots Impounding20.00 License Fees $40.00 $40.00 $55.00 $55.00 $130.00 $175.00 $160.00 $250.00 $61.00 0 35.00 45.00 $684.00 6,666.75 $5,079.75 Licenses Issued 15 5 1250 Tickets Issued 2 2 2 7 Other animals picked up Raccoon Opposum Squirrels Bats Birds, Fowl1 Other Skunk Livestock Groundhog 0 12�03 I 1 1 1 o 9 0 10 0 0 2 1 7 c ger t Do Bites City County Ci ty Cou2nty ty ounty ty ounty 4 0 5 6 4 8 3 Other Bites Cat Bites Rat coon o 0 1 1 Rat 0 1 0 2 2 3 0 2 2 Dead Animals Picked Up Pets wild e s Wild eets wila reLs Wild OD 1C 6 OD 2C 2 1D 2C 9 OD 6C 7 Dumped Cont y oua y y ount ty ounty Cit" ODog 1Dog 8Dog ODog ODog 1Dog 9Dog 5Dog ocat OCat 3Cat OCat OCat OCat 5Cat 2Cat KIRKWOOD COMMUNITY COLLEGE in cooperation with The Iowa City Historic Preservation Commission presents BUII•fDING HOME PRESE] WORKSHOP; Tuesdays z - 9 P -m - F) April 9 - May z, 1985 City High School, Rrn. 116 Classes Include: s historic building xioye9 Conserving eergy in April p • Consern Slone, brick and mortar cleaning and repair xro390 April se • Masonry: • Wood finishes and ornamental exterior trim x '4039, April 13 compal,ble additions to historic buildings x 20392 April 30 • Designing features. Plaster. paint and x'4°039: 1lwalflpapper M a y t • Interior 5E 5510 N: Includes •FULL TU1T10N: ss.00lWorkshop s:o.00Fuli Session REGISTER BY PHONE.. IT'S EASY call If you're on the Cedar Rapids phone system call 398-54'.. 33&•6&90 the Iowa City phone system call 1•600.332.6633 any other phone system TYour socia, security Section x of the class Tell the Clerk: Your name. address. phone x 0 BUILDING AND HOME PRESERVATION WORKSHOPS CONSERVING ENERGY IN HISTORIC BUILDINGS Instructor: Dick Peterson With energy efficiency demands placed on the existing building stock, many owners of historic properties are assessing the ability of these buildings to conserve energy with an eye to improving thermal performance. This workshop will acquaint owners of historic structures with measures that will achieve the greatest energy savings with the least alteration to the important architectural features or building materials of historic properties. MASONRY: STONE, BRICK AND MORTAR CLEANING AND REPAIR Instructor: David Arbogast This topic provides information on recognizing signs of deteriorating masonry, identifying the causes of the deterioration, and selecting preserva- tion treatments which emphasize effective maintenance, cleaning and repair of historic masonry buildings with the gentlest methods possible. WOOD FINISHES AND ORNAMENTAL EXTERIOR TRIM Instructor: Iver Iverson This workshop will assist owners of historic buildings in evaluating the condition of exterior wood surfaces, in selecting appropriate treatments for preparing wood surfaces for exterior finishes, and in choosing finishes most suitable for exterior historic wood. Ornamental exterior trim - types, examples, and appropriate replacements - will also be discussed. DESIGNING COMPATIBLE ADDITIONS TO HISTORIC BUILDINGS Instructor: David Arbogast The challenge of fitting new space requirements into the existing design of an historic building will be explored in this class. Designing compatible links between old and new portions of a building with sensitivity toward continuity of scale, bulk, and texture and toward the maintenance of the quality of materials and craftsmanship will be reviewed. INTERIOR FEATURES: PLASTER, PAINT AND WALLPAPER Instructors: David Jones, Steve Vanderwoude This workshop will provide guidance on the maintenance and repair of interior features of historic buildings. Coping with plaster problems, refinishing interior wood surfaces, preparing to paint, and selecting'decorative features to enhance the interior spaces of historic structures are some of the topics that will be discussed in this class. The University of Iowa L Iowa City. Iowa 52242 ED, rami _ A5 Women's Resource and Action Center 190 N. Madison Street (919) 353.6265 Dear CITY CLERK ,a,,- On e.r On April 13th, as part of the week long conference "Racism: A Women's Issue", a series of workshops will be held addressing how racism touches the issues of global economics, work, health care, local politics, the legal system, and Black women's studies. There will be a 2h hour workshop on each of these issues, facilitated by a local woman with experience in that area. It is hoped that these workshops will be a forum for the sharing of information and the formulation of action proposals. In order to widen the scope of information presented and thus the possibilities for idea sharing, we wish to extend a special invi- tation to you or members of your organization to participate in the workshop on oc„� (JC,AiL�(5 All of the workshops will be held on April 13 at 1:0 tb o 3:30, 3rd Floor, Iowa Memorial Union at the University of Iowa. The events of the conference are free and open to everyone. A registration form is enclosed with this letter. We hope you will take advantage of this opportunity to address how racism affects your concerns. If you have any questions about the workshops or conference, please feel free to contact any of us. Hope to see you therel Sincerely, Workshop Subcommittee of Ad Hoc Committee of Women Against Racism Mary Arnold, 338-5601 Shani Brooks, 356-2319 work, 337-5775 home Darlene Clayton, 356-2319 work, 354-4904 Papusa Molina, 353-3743 work, 338-0622 home Barb Wieser, 354-3914 w i .59 i Date: March 25,1985 To: Mayor John McDonald and the City Council �\ From: Phil tlychay Chair Resources Conservation Commission Re: Information on Utility Franchise Fees �� Please find attached an article on franchise fees by Hallie Yacknin. This article offers a clear and precise picture of the legal framework and social necessity of utility franchise fees. I hope this article and the RCC recomendations of March 18,1985 will help you to decide that the franchise fee and the short term agreement are in the best public interest. KAP CLERK ;M No More Something for Nothing: Utility Franchise Fees Hallie Yacknin March 1985 y' i I � 1 1 i � 1 � I As Iowa Cities find their franchise agreements with public utilities coming to term, they are reevaluating those agreements to see whatts in it for them. Cities may grant a franchise of up to 25 years to a public utility for the right to "erect, maintain, and operate plants and systems.• Iowa Code Seo. 364.2(4)(a) (7983). with that grant, the utility may acquire the right to use and occupy the streets and public grounds of the city and the power of eminent domain to appropriate property for the erection of its distribution system. In the absence of such rights a utility would be required to purchase or lease property easements from the city, much as they would from private owners. Considering the amount of property used by the utility for its distribution system, this is no trifling power. Cities hold public property in trust for its citizens, and for the use by the general public. The grant of property rights to a utility, however, is incompatible with the use of that property by the general public. As the Supreme Court noted in 1893, 5sa- The use which the (utility) makes of the streets is an exclusive and permanent one, and not one in common with j the general public. The ordinary traveler, whether on foot or in a vehicle passes to and fro along the streets, and his use and occupation thereof are temporary and shifting. The space he occupies one moment he abandons the next to be occupied by any other traveler. This use is common to all members of the public, and is a use open equally to citizens of other states with those of the state in which the street is situate. But the use made by the (utility) is, in respect to so much of the space as it Occupies with its poles, permanent and exclusive. It as effectually and permanently dlsposaesses the general public as if it had destroyed that amount of ground. 91to of St. Louie v. Ye stern ❑neon Telegraph o , 148 B.S. 92, 98-99 (1893). As cities begin to negotiate new franchise agreements with utilities, this grant of property without compensation is being reconsidered. The idea of demanding compensation for a franchise is not new to the 8013; Iowa cities in the past have enacted ordinances requiring franchise fees only to have them struck down by the Iowa courts. But the powers of Iowa cities in the past and the citiest powers and authority today are much different. i Than, the constitution precluded cities from acting without express statutory authority. The Home Rule Amendment of 1972 has since expanded the power of Iowa cities, enabling them to act in the interests of their citizens absent express statutory prohibitions or conflict with state law. This 13 not to say that cities are without statutory restrictions on certain revenue -raising measures. The power of cities to tax is limited, as is the power to enact regulatory license fees. But the power of a city to sail or rent property to ta utility or any other person involves neither a taxing or licensing power. As cities consider ways to exact compensation ,550 OR )r franchises granted to utilities, it is well to understand the Lstinctions between these fees and to draft ordinances 2cordingly. I RANCHISE FEE AS TAE j The Ioxa Code is explicit is restricting citiest authority to az. "A city may not levy a tax unless specifically authorized by tate law.* Iowa Code Sec. 364.3(4) (1983). This code section is n amended version of an earlier statute, Iowa Code Sec. 368.2 1966), which provided that "cities and towns shall not have the over to levy any tax, i n fee charas or other x -action except as expressly authorized by atatutee(emphasis dded). The legislature, in amending this section, clearly and I zplicitly excluded assessments, fees, excises and charges from ij .he restrictive condition of express statutory authority, ecognizing as it -did so the distinction between•etaxea• and ;base other "ex -actions". A tax "is a charge to pay the cost of government without -egard to special benefits conferred." Newman v. City of [nd+anola, 232 N.W.2d 568, 573 (Iowa 1975)• A franchise fee, )owever, is indeed a charge with regard to the very special benefits of property rights conferred in the franchise agreement. rhllq a frannhi a fee in clearly not a tax, either in latent or 4ithin the meaning of Seo. 364.3(4) of the Iowa Code. FRANCEISE FEE AS LICENSE OR REGULATORY MEASURE Licenses or permits issued under the police powers of a city morals or are *regulatory measures involving the public health, welfare.• Merreili v. City of St, chorea, 96 N.W.2d 144, 148 (Mich. 1959). Thus a license or permit scheme must serve to regulate the standards of operation, and the revenue from the fees must not be "disproportionate to the cost of issuing the license, and the regulation of the business to which it applies." Id, Such regulatory schemes, by way of example, include construction permits (as in the Merrelli case), auto licenses, animal licensing, and other such measures which serve to further the police powers of the city. The Merrelli case involved the reasonableness of a building permit fee which was far in excess of the costs of administration. Such a fee would be (and was, in that case) declared a tax and struck down if it was in reality a use of the Police power was a subterfuge to enact and enforce what is in reality a revenue -raising ordinance.■ LL at 150. A franchise fee as compensation for franchise rental rights Is not, however, intended in any way to be a regulatory measure. There in no subterfuge involved here; indeed, the fee is not proposed as a police power measure to regulate the utility13 operating standards or the use of the easements, but entails merely a fee for rental. The city's police power to regulate the use of the streets is not being offered as the city's quo for the franchise fee quid. There is, therefore, no basis for restricting the use of the income from the franchise fee to the administrative costs and the costs of reasonable wear and tear of the streets. Such restrictions apply to the use to which regulatory nermit revenues can be put, and not where, as here, the fee is not couched in the police powers of regulation, but is this pre -Home Rule case, the court stated that "a city exercises but a delegated power, and has no authority save as it is expresly conferred or necessarily implied from the powers granted." U, at 325. This restriction on cities' powers, in combination with the express grant by the legislature of the use of streets and highways to public utilities provided the basis for the court's decision in that case that cities are not entitled to compensation for the use of their property. The Home Rule Amendment, enacted in 1972, however, has dramatically altered the law in this area. A city no longer has only that power which has been expressly delegated by the legislature, but •may, except as expressly limited by the Constitution, and if not inconsistent with the laws of the general assembly, exercise any power and perform any function it deems appropriate to protect and preserve the rights, privileges and property of the city or its residents, and to preserve and improve the power, safety, health, welfare, comfort and convenience of its residents.' Iowa Code Sec. 364.1 (1983). Adding to this delegation of power to cities in the absence of express statutory prohibition is the very express statutory authority to exact a franchise fee. A 1983 amendment to the Code provides that, 'if a city franchise fee is assessed to customers of a franchise, the fee shall not be assessed to the city as a customer.' Iowa Code Seo. 364.2(4)(f) (1983). It would be illogical to presume that this amendment, which acknowledges the assessment of franchise fees, is less than statutory authority to exact such a fee. Thus the Home Rule Amendment, as well as this statutory expression acknowledging franchise fees, changes significantly the circumstances under which a city would enact a franchise fee. The restrictions under a city's delegated authority, which accounted for the court's distinguishing Teva Teleohone from the Supreme Court's vaetarn Onion decision, no longer exist. Iowa eitiee now have the ^tet hority to enact franchise fees, as well as the e¢islature'e annarent blessin¢. REASONABLENESS OF THE FRANCHISE FEE Having established that a franchise fee is neither a tax nor a license fee, and so is free of the restrictions surrounding those measures, the question then becomes what constitutes a reasonable franchise fee for the rental of city property. In particular, this section will address the reasonableness of a franchise fee based upon a percentage of the gross revenues of the utility. This method is the one currently used by the City of Des Hoines and the City of Sioux City, and is being contemplated by the City of Iowa City. In City of Chinaan M hts v public Service Co., 408 Ill. 910, 97 N.E.2d 268 (1951), the court in dicta criticized fees based upon gross receipts as having no relation to the amount of space in a street used by a given company. Under the court's reasoning, charging a fee based upon gross receipts rather than the amount of property occupied by the utility "is wholly lacking in uniformity, and is purely arbitrary and discriminatory in nature." Buhl in Service Co. at 272. 5So 8 This dicta must be analyzed with regard to current market values. In the market place, rents are not based merely upon area occupied, but also upon the fair market value of the property as determined by the income derived from that property. Thus a small parcel is often more highly valued than a large parcel where the smaller parcel is capable of producing a higher return. This principle comes as no surprise to any renter or property buyer who finds, for example, high rents or property values in a downtown parcel as compared to cheaper rates for the same sized parcel five miles from town. Similarly, the fair market value of the property rented by a utility can be reasonably, calculated by assessing how much income it produces. If a property used by a utility produces for it only a small income - for example, because the property only Serves a small consumption base - the value of that rented property is much less than if it served a larger consumption base and was thus capable of participating in the production of greater revenue for the utility. Viewing a franchise fee based upon a percentage of gross receipts in this light demonstrates its reasonableness. Such a fee, in fact, is more reasonable than a static rental fee established for the duration of the franchise. In the case where the rental fee is established when utility revenues are high, a rental fee arrived at in this manner would exceed the fair market value were the utility's income stream to decrease. Conversely, it the utility rates were to increase after the franchise fee was agreed upon - for example, because of inflation - the franchise 550 i fee would no longer reflect the true market value of the franchise. A franchise fee assessed on a per pole or per mile of wire or cable basis runs into similar problems. While a city may choose either of these alternatives, it is not clear that a fees of a net rental value or based upon area occupied are any more reasonable than a fee based upon percentage of gross receipts. Property values change, but fees of this sort don't reflect that change. Since utility rates move upward rapidly to reflect the s to avoid a deterioration in the rate of inflation, 1f the city i constant dollar value of the franchise fee, it too must be iTying the franchise j upwardly mobile with the rate of inflation. fee to the utility's gross revenues is not only an easy way to do li this, it is practical and reasonable as well. CONCLUSION now light oa the power of Iowa The Rome Rule Amendment sheds cities to assess franchise fees in their grants of franchises to utilities. What cities once had to give away, because of the absence of express statutory delegation of authority to the to demand as a right of contrary, they are now enabled i proprietorship. and occupation by a utility of A franchise fee for the use ea. When a city city streets, allays and grounds is a rental f public and grants takes those property rights from the general utility, it is not only them to a corporation such as a iit is an reasonable to demand a rental fee for that grant, eneral public as trustee of public obligation of the city to the g property. j"S� 1 New Criteria Publishing Company I The New Criteria Publishing Company, Inc. was founded in 1982 as a sub- sidiary of the Community Action Research Group of Iowa, Inc. New Criteria creates a forum for the discussion and debate of new ideas in the areas of consumer and utility -related problems, the I economy, the environment, and human rights. Publications may be order from: New Criteria Publishing Company P.O. Sox 1427 Ames, Iowa 50010 I (515) 292-4758 Reports on the Iowa Economy Reports in this series represent current 1 work by academics, professionals and policymakers whose focus is the State of Iowa. Works chosen for inclusion represent critical analysesof, anfacing d f new solutions for, problems Iowa economy at both the state and local levels. The series is under the ' general editorship of Dr. Michael F. Sheehan, an Iowa City economist speci- alizing in public utility, tax, and industrial economics. Associate editor is David Osterberg, an economist specializing in energy, water resource, and agricultural problems, and a member of the Iowa State House of Representatives. Series reports are available from, and manuscripts may be submitted to: Osterberg 6 Sheehan REPORTS ON THE IOWA ECONOMY 823 Clark Street Iowa City, Iowa 52240 J Cover design by Nicole Harris. nr v7 S d 1 j Do accidents happen anymore?. cn-G � 20 Million -dollar lawsuits beg question of parents' responsibility j By Bob firown Trwwr toads tkMYkM Areader from Barrington, 111., was confused and pensive about news reports of a huge court award to a boy who fell off a slide in a Chicago park and was severely. injured. The boy — he was nearly 2 years old at the time — was playing on the tilde In Chicago's Hamlin Park on Sept. 1, 1978. He was climbing up the slept of a tplral•shaped "lorndo tilde"; his mother was on the Imps just behind him. The boy fell through the railing on the tide of the steps; he landed on his head on the asphalt below. He suffered a skull fracture and brain damage In the fall; his left side was paralyzed, he has speech and vision problems, and he has been forced to wear a helmet for protection. The boy is 8 years old now. In at Chicago courtroom last month, A settlement was agreed to under which he will recelve a minimum of $9.9 million — and possibly as much as $29.8 million If he lives to be 76. THE MIWONS of dollars must be paid by the Chicago Park Districq Miracle Recreation Equip- ment Co. of Grinnell, Iowa, menu - factures of the slide; and All -State Fence Co. of Chicago, which In. stalled the slide. In the lawsuit, the park district and the two companies had been charged with negligence. And the suit said that the playlot should have been supervised. The atlomeys for the boy and his family seemed pleased with the decision. But Maurice Thominet, chief engineer for the Chicago Park District, was upset. "It the park district has to pay the majority of that settlement, we are going to have to take a cold, hard look at all of our equipment, and even the Idea of having playlots at all," he said. He said that the park district could not afford to have full• time supervisors at every park. 1 can't Imagine a mother letting a I. or 2 -year-old go up a 12 -foot elide," 7hominet said.' Chat sounds preposterous. What god would It have done to have a supervisor there? What do you think a mother would have done If a supervisor had told her she could not go up the 'lomado'?" 71hominet said that, next spring, all of the "lomado" slides will be tom down. WHICH BRINGS us to the reader from Barrington. I should say right here Out she was full of genuine sympathy for the young boy and his family. "I feel for the family of this child," she arid. "!be anguish of being right next to your cmld when he fails with such a catastrophic result is not In my personal experi- ence and 1 hope it never will be, ever." I. Then she made her Point: "Do accidents happen anymore?" She expanded on Out thought: "Can someone slip on the Ice in the park and say, 'I wasn't looking — 1 didn't see the patch of Ice and slipped and broke my leg'? Can a mother take the risk of taking her young child up to the top of a lomado slide, with every good Intention, and have an accident? "Who Is responsible for a child In a park, the park district or the parent? How sterile an environment do we need or do we want? Do we have to eliminate all slides? Swinge hit 1 -year-old children in the head, I'm sure with dire consequences In some instances. Do we eliminate swings? "Parents and children have acci- dents; they make wrong decisions, they tum around for an Instant and the accident happens." THE WOMAN was asking this: With multimillion -dollar settle- ments for accidents like this one, Is the time coming when we will reach a point when no public facilities ere available for our use, because of the threat of possible lawsuits? Is the. time coming when doctors will not accept certain risky uses, because - of the threat of malpractice suits? 71hings do seem headed in that . direction. The concept of accidents merely happening —with no one at fault — seems to be disappearing. And yet this whole area of discus. Bion Is far from simple. That young boy needs much medical care, and who is going to pay for it? As the woman from Barrington noted: "In this child's Instance, the bills must be astronomical. Where do (his parents) obtain themoney to pay them? (Our family) lives very well; but would be hard-pressed to provide the money to cover the high cost of giving medical and educa- tional treatment to meet this child's needs. Where do people get the money? "I don't have any answers. All I know Is that eliminating the large slides and restricting play Is not the answer. Defective equipment Should be off the market and out of our parks. But accidents happen. Where do we draw the line? And who takes care of these children?" All good questions. Questions like thew must have been coming up over the ages. But suddenly — in a time of soaring medical costs and multi-million dollar court judgments — they seem especially urgent. No heroes; no villalpa. Just questions that perhaps have no god answers. Thrift Crisis Closin of Ohio S&Ls After Run on Deposits Is One for the Books U.S., State Officials Scramble To Fix Caps in Insurance; Gov. Celeste olil the Hook Fallout From ESM's Failure r A W.,u Slt ")auuuLNMI RaunauY "I've gone from kindergarten to first grade In learning about banking," says Ohio Gov. Iticburd Celeste, who an Friday ordered n rxatrehartered uftp and I= Institutions closed for at least three days. 'Ten days ago." he adds, "I couldn't have told you the difference" between federal and state-sponsored Insurance tom. The governor isn't the only we befud- dled about bow to handle the depositor rams at some of the slate's thrift Instill. tions. "I've got manuals here on bow to mw - age a savings and loan, but there's nothing written about this," complains William Gartman, vice president of lef arson 18u . mg At Savings Hank of Steubenville, Ohio. The thrift Institution hesitated, opened briefly on Friday in defiance of the Cover ior's order but then closed early afteb learning that banks weren't bmoring los checks, Ohio and federal authorints are Illy iag to come up with o strategy to re• open the Sofa (see page V. In Wash- orglon officials are of sea ovV Ansa to bring order to the chaotic government. securities market (tee Pape 71. Fm a chronology of has E.S.N.'s collapse led b the Ohio thrifts' clogs, an page S The simahox text ffuen through Friday's credit markets (see page Z. The Democratic governor ordered the ttlo" after a surge of wlthdrawW at a number of Ohio thrift Mind= In the Bank lmance N nNe W �spmsored deposiarwt war closed earlier and put up for ale after nuv gtanuning from heavy losses In Its dulinga,wlth the failed ZXJL Oovem• mmt Securities 1nc.,.d lel lauderme, lla LIM WALL blhUf JUURNAL MUNDAY, MARCH 18, 1985 Scem Pram 10k The temporary chs" In Olk an Ise - Lend to be the moss sxter dve such action affecting financial hutttutlau snap the Great Depression. And they wen preceded by scenes that looted right out of the 111148. Outside Molitor ]aan & Building Co. In the Cincinnati suburb of Delhi. more than IM people walled In file W Thursday Ing bale 1121mee Enters po table tel"lon sets. they wailed for the thrift to open Friday and to get their money out. "Ohio Deposit Guarantee Frond: Ali Savings Guaranteed In Full." said the sign over Molitor's glass door. But 35•year-old Christine Wright, unconvinced. had driven 90 miles from her home In Greenville, Ohio, In wait in be for her mother. . Her mother, Ms. Wright said, had been hit by a "double whammy." The mother had had 98.000 In cash In Home State Sao Ings, but she had been lucky enough to get It out N time. Then, she had turned around and put the money in Molitor. which. Hough financially sound, was being hit by A run of Its own. k4. Wright sold her mother hu little other Income except a mWmum WLI Security cheek. She added: "I wasn't even aware there were two ellfferem t" (of deport Insur. once)—state and federal." Ms. Wright and the others waited In vain. Molitor didn't open Friday mom - Ing. Psychological Crisis However worrisome N the depositors at the closed Ohio thrifts, the overall damage Inalcted by the Slid. crisis war more pgy- chological than economic. The combined assets of the closed institutions was about $5.3 billion, only slightly mon than 109. of the told S&L assets in the state and less than the assets of many medium-sized banks. But the S.S.M. collapse had far wider repercussions. The losses incurred by those dealing with the govemment-secuA• ties firm are estimated at $315 million. In addition to Home State's loss, winch could total 9150 Million, American Savings & Law Aumlatlon of Florida, In Karol. es- tlmated Its net Iota u 355.3 mWlm: the city of Toledo, Ohio, said 119 million la, Vested through E.S.M. Is in Jeopardy: Beaumont, Texas, may be out ISO million, and a number of other titles and invertors may suffer losses. Moreover, the psychological damage may be heavy. The failure of E.S.M. Lad HomkState makes clear that, although the economy Is expanding vigorously for a third consecutive year, the nation's fin r. •lal system remains vulnerable to disquiet. Ing stralns. It Is being shacked repeatedly by the problems of shaitl' forelm loans. lures, depletion of and banking scan. The fallout from the J9.S.M. collapse Wo has exposed the wlvete of many th tit executives and mualelpal•finance officers, wrlous raps in ane state's system Of cit poslt'Insurance, and the failure of federal and state regulatory official to rove quickly to stem the crisis. And It Illustrates the continuing dangers In the vast, largely unregulated market for government securities. The current deba• cle Is the fifth In eight years to strike that market—a market that once was a model of stability and conservatism but has bo- come an arena of hlgh•dakes speculation. Although the earlier disasters al Winters Government Securities Inc. to IM, Dryr dale Government Securities Inc. to 1102. lnmbard•W W Inc. In 1902 and 1Jm Capful Group last year provoked some proposals for move extensive regulatlm. hale was time. And now, for the first time, the troubles al a governments"des film have spilled out of the marketplace and dts- mpted the lives of thousands of ordinary clUz s. In Ohio, moreover, It was ordl. nary citizens Who were draining the thrift Institutions. depaslts—In contrast to the problem lir Continental Illinois torp., a federally Insured Institution when a slew of bad loam sparked a nm by big money managers last year. In view of the financial ytrers stem - trial; from the crisis In Ohio, the Federal Reserve System Is generally believed to be unlikely now to go forward with asrldety expected tlghteoing of Its monetary talky. '"IV Fed can't afford to rock the boar" by tion slog its credit reins. says DavW IL Ruler. oke President aid chief fiaainal economist at First National Bank of W- eaga He adds that the central bank may even have to "take action to calm depod- tors' anxieties about the safety of Ohio two liatittelau." In fact. the Fed already halt acted to ease the crisis, making emergency lona to some Ohio thrifts and saying that the Fed stands mady to extend additional loafs a neA&A . "We have WM taking appropri. ate steps to work with these Institutions to Worm them of -JI-1 ral and other m qulrements for ads •nistince" says KArm Hom, the president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland. Iaiaiard Santw of Griggs t Swim Inc., A financial omtdtbkg firm. predicts that the "problem will be over in a short Period of rime." He called It an 'Y9olued dluatlm" Nal won't spread to other areas. Adds Raymond Gama, executive vice president of Cates Consulting Analysts In New York: "The Imptlea11oru for federally Insured institutions ase zero" The damage already done by the Co - lapse of E.SAL is sparking calls from po. litical leaders and others for stricter regu• lation, however, and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York stepped up Its surveil- lance of the govemment-securitles market after Drysdale fatted. The New York Fed says that since than It has lengthened the fid Of gmemmeat-seeuAtb dealers mak- log voluntary dumal reports to the Fed, tlghleoed sone Acwkntiag standards am ,5-5017- shnnemd the rime tar trading o securities that haven't been issued yet. Iasi month, the New York Fed proposed voluntary standards of capital adequacy for the dealers. However, olficials conceded that most of the Fed's surveillance is SWI directed at 36 major dealers, known as Primary dealers, who report dally to the Fed on their securities positions. None of them have Wed. The problems have involved "huge people." notes Ralph F. Peters, the chsimun of Discount Corp. of New York, a primary dealer. And more of the steps Mktg by the New York Fed would have paereskd the B.S.M. collapse. o a ¢neral comment. a spokesman for the New York Fed remarks. "No matter What ally regulator does. an one Sao pre vent baud." But other observers Conplaht that only Up service has been paid to regulation. Fe. His Ramp. a general partner of Lazard Freres i Co., says. "When Drysdale came up, we sale( we had to do something. Then there was Lombard -Wall. Now this. When Is enough?" He warns that the Ilnatscial markets have "turned Into a buile casino." and he adds, "Al least 11 a casim, you mow you're p mblog." Celeste's Decision The problems at the thrifts In Oho bills up quickly. At 3 a.m. last Friday. the telephone rang at the Cincinnati home of Laird L• elle, executive vice president of Charter Oak Savings Association. The caller was Goy. Celeste, who had been calling thrift executives around Obo shoe midnight. He wanted to know what Charter Oak was go - kg to do. •1'm concerned about some of the other companies Ithriftsl. " the governor said, as Mr. lAzelle recalls it. Mr. Celeste old the executive that some of the other thrifts In- vited by the Ohio Insurance fund were ask - Ing for a bank holiday. but that he hadn't yet decided Mr. IaMtle old the governor that Char ter planned to keep open. He reminded Mr. Celeste that the Fed's "Idea is to keep the doors open, and that's how you break a panic." But he also gave the governor Mme alternatives. One was to keep the thrifts, Including Home State, open, but to Brhit Individual withdrawals. Another was for the state to put Its full faith and credit behind the thrifts. 1 can't do that," Gov. Celeste replied. At 5 a.m., two hours after calling Mr. I"De. Gov. Celeste decided to dose the ?I thrifts Insured by the Ohio fund. The move was stunning. The time -hon - Dred way o deal with a hank tun le o throw money cog IL Instllutloas IlgWdate asMis. borrow o Ne hill from Ne Fed's Lwindow end do all Nry can o meet Nelr tastomers' withdrawai dr mends, Nus IetW¢ Ne tun Play ItseU out and restoring conftdence. Some statrosured thrifts were Prepay Lag to do just that. . lining Up Help Anchor Savings ASSOCIation of Hills• born, Oho. had contacted the discount win• dowat the Fed and also a team sr, up by Merrill lynch h Co. to help the threatened thrifts liquidate assets. "We were mobilising the rescuma to create a iol of liquidity If we Deeded L." pyo George McGuire. president. And all week long, the Cleveland Fed had bem onblirly traitor, It wmufd Ind money to Institutions seeking liquidity at the bargain e% discount rate, "under nor- mal conditions." That phrase may be key. -Normal con- ditions" means pulling up the required col- lateral. State officials worried that some of the SMtrinsured thrifts mightn't have been able to do It, at least not cause the Fed didn't regulate lilts group of thrifts, it didn't have data an their It- nances, though Fed staffers had been working around the clock Since Home Slate's collapse to collect It. "One option was to let the run continue. let H nasi out." Gov. Celeste says. "When g thncdo.aBut Itewas dear that sev- eral Ithriftsl didn't feel they could open [Friev mor mason deredtc closing lust ththe e thrills in jeopardy but rejected Net Idea. "There was no good place to amWtsize." Gov. Ce- rate says. "without raising serious ques, tions about the others.' Mat of the thrifts dosed without ques- tom, and some with genuine relief. But. hate Jefferson Building i Savings—whlcb Mr. Garman described as "solid" and •,safe,,—Buckeye Savings Ar LM Co, of BeBahe was defiant. Buckeye opened, as usual, at 8:30 a.m., despite an a a.m. Call that "supposedly Carne from the {over. nor's office.-- Says George Hazlett, the thrth's chairman. He and other officials dde't consider the call a valid order. ImplIed Threat Around noon. though. Mr. Hulett got a Mond call. it came from an official at the state Department of Commerce. who un - plied that state police might dose Buckeye by tome. The thrift locked its doors a few minutes later. Mr. Hazlett complains, •'What the governor dui was incite people into being nervous." Gov. Celeste• meanwhile, had Down to Cincinnati to give the first of several news conferences in various Otho cities that day. The "severe and spreading lack of cond- dente" made the bank hoiktay necessary, be Mid at is Cleveland Dews conference, adding that his goal was "restructuring Nese institutions as soon as possible In a viable way." Asked by a reporter what kind of m structuring would occur, Mr. Celeste ice plied. •'U I could explain It, we wouldn't need o take [time] o do It." At his side was Mrs. Horn of the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland. "We have delivered a lot of cash In the last several days" to Ohio thrifts by lend - Ing them money through the discount win- dow, Mrs. Rom said. "And we aren't the only one In that business. A lot of comuner• dui banks were really on the front Wes to delivering the cash [loan)." But she added that the problem wap't "A run on cash u much u a run on cootldence." R Fed Role Unknown IUs. Horn's role In Mr. Celeste's deet - don Isn't known. but her view might have been Influenced by the Fed's experience with Home State. The Cleveland Fed was an active, though secured, lender to Home State In the days before It collapsed—but Its loam weren't enough to sop the run and end the Ohio thrifts' crisis there. After that midmorning news confer- ence, Mr. Celeste and Mrs. Horn adjourned to the Cleveland Fed to huddle with aides and with officials of Ohio banks and thrifts to figure out what to do. By Friday night, they still didn't how, but a pattern was emerging. Throughout the weekend. Mr. Celeste shuttled among Cleveland. Cincinnati and Columbus, hold - Ing news conferences and meetings. His public pronouncements made it dear that the three-day holiday he had ordered might be extended. Ali the while his entou- rage was growing. The state added another airplane to accommodate the growing - crowd of reporters who wanted to follow Use 'governor. How the Panic Began Throughout the weak of March e, the public beeame increasingly aware of None State's involvement with. and lama from. BSIC Late In the week, a full-scale run devel• e million. Aseseccured Ioan from the Faderai Reserve Bank helped, but not mush. Around 10 p.m. on Sunday, March 10, Gov. Celeste's OIBce aamoneed that the glass had appointed a conservator to take cols - Trot of Home Sok cad to fly to sell it to a healthy linanctal les11laton. Home {tate was shut down, and people who 91111 had honey on deposit there couldn't gr, to It. Their deposits were Insured by the Ohio Deposit Guarantee Fund, which had been established In 1955 mainly for the hundreds of small neighborhood thrifts N Clnchutad that didn't want to deal with the Intricacies of federal deposit lnSacance. Though the W was sponsored by the suite. it was a. nanced by member Institutions, which were assessed 27. of their deposits to R long. And unlike the Federal Savings and lean Insurance Corp., which insures thrift deposits up to S100,00o, the Ohio fund In- sured deposits up to say amount. Many of Its members advertised that pledge. 11mlted Assets But there was a catch, The Ohio ford had assets of $136 million, and It soon be- came clear that Home State's losses proba• bly exceeded that and might wipe out the fund. The Ohio legislature sorted to rush through a bill creating a new lap million W, which Home Sick wouldn't be al• lowed to touch. It was a prudent move, but it also prompted lots of news sones about the weakness of the state-sponsored de. posh Insurance. Those sones were read by many Cincinnatian, Including BIII Cun• ningliam. Mr. Cumnogham is the hot of a talk show on radio station WLW In Cincinnati. In the days before Home State's collapse, he had been lalling to state officials and 55oz dlacuWng their reamuranes on the Ur. "I had spent a week of shows telling people not to panic, the money is sate;' Mr. Can- ningham recalls. "I bought It book, nue and sinker." But no more. Last Wednesday and Thursday, Mr. Cunningham went on the air with a different tune. "1 said it was time (for state officials and banking exm- lives] to panic;' he says. "I told them (his Ilstenersl there was pingto be a disaster" because the Otho fund had been ex: hausted. Mr. Cunningham's Wednesday show also featured Mr. L ueOe of Charter Oak Savings. As withdrawals mounted that day. Mr. lazelle had called Mr. Qm- ntngham and volunteered to go on the air that night to reassure depositors. Mr. Cum• dngbam said he waned Mr. Iaelle that the tactic might backfire, but Mr. taselle said he would take the risk. He did. But the show apparently only fo- cused the spotlight on Charter Oak, which had been solidly provable for three con- secutive years, and on Mollor Loam i Building. All state -Insured thrifts In the area W heavy withdrawals Thursday. but Charter add Honor had the heaviest. Mr. Iaelle phoned Mr. Cunningham and said. "eW. It dldm't work." The state decided to atop In. Kenneth Cox, the recently named director of the Commerce .Departspent. which Oversees the Division of Savings and Lis, called an a p.m. hews conference to reassure the ' Public. Idns Mr. Cox was hardly reassuring. He said that deposit= should nce in thrifts Insnrad by the Ohio fund AW that the state is "pualtng every mea- ae- eelvable" to make rue Hone SLate depkl- ors get their money. But be &cited quea- dona on whether the stale uteitdltlotalty Insured Home Sate depositors. At one point. a woman got up and old the hushed group that she and her husband had recently moved to [loco -ll from Ne- braska. and had deposited all their money In Home Sate In hopes of buying a house. ••They said your money is gnaranteea" said the woman, who didn't give her name. "What am 1 to teak Dow?" All this played on the local 11 pm. dews, along with pictures of huge over night Eras forming outside many thrLfa. Ticking Time Bomb Home Slate was clearly a deJdog time bomb, and the detonator was Its relation- ship with E.S.M. Government Securities. And Indications are that Ohio regulators knew perhaps as early as ]gal that the tuner was Licking. Home State engaged In different types of transactions with E.S.M. Between the end of 1902 and Sept. 30. 1161. SEC filings show, Hum Sate nearly 'doubled Its as- sets, mainly through transactions with E.S.M. The transactions Included Home Rate's purchase of Sam million of Govern - went National Mortgage Association certif- oats and $410 million of U.S. Treasury bills tram R.S.M. Home State financed most if the pine, chase by selling securities bark to SSJ/. and agreeing to repurchase than about a year later. Home State had 591.1 million of Its own cash Involved In the transaction last Sept. 30 and also had pledged S16 mil• Ilon of U.S. Treasury bonds and notes as collateral. The upshot was that Home State would be vulnerable E anything happened to the securities, especially U It did lots of buslness with E.S.M. All this worried key people for some time. "I know that the Ohio Deposit Guar- antee Fled knew about the concentrations of Home State's Ibvesunentsl with E.S.M. early In the game." says Steven Farrar, the treasurer of the North Carolina deposit Insurance fund, who visited Ohio fund om- ciLLs last week. "They tried to do some, thing, but Inked the power." Fund's Trustees The reason. Mr. Farrar suggests, is that the trustees of Ohio's fund, unlike North Carolina's, come from member In- stitutions. "You don't want the fox watch - Ing the henhouse," Mr. Farrar says. Roger Yurchuk, the Ohio fund's counsel, concedes that the hind can't Issue orders to mem- bers, but he adds: "You can tell someone not to do It, and U they keep doing It you throw them out." But that dldo't happen, and apparently sate savings and loan regulators weren't much more forceful.'"rhey worked to tell Hoa Mate how threatening the situation was; one observer says. But the intent was to allow Ione Soh to gradually un. wind Itself hem E.S.M. However, Home State did "ktlataollelly all" of Its repur• chase agreements with E.S.M., the thrift sad lags year in a fling wed the Securities sad Bxchuv Connotation. Home Slate officials aren't commenting on the events that led up to the closing. "This Isn't an appropriate time to eom• med4" David J. Schlebel, Home State's chairman and chlef executive, said yester- day. "I'd like to but I can't." After further questions, be said In a trallng voice, "I have been advised by the conservator. Arlo Smith, not In comment on anything." Impact on Cities For Toledo, the E.S.M. debacle has put more than the 119 million It Invested In jeopardy. If has split the city adminsus- tion along party Imes, and the political quibbles and finger posting have shaken the confidence of the business community at a time the city is trying to revitalize It- self. City leaders think Toledo's plan In participate in the construction of a conven• tion center by Issuing hands might be at stake. "L was absolutely floored that anything like this eaild happen;' says CLester Dr vow, the chief executive officer of SbellerGlobe Corp. In Toledo.'"nere Is no Von that a great deal of confidence (a city admiWstratim) has been lost; we have to overcome this easdo." Toledo began investing through E.S.M. to June Isar and Its Investment totaled about Iso mullion but u the time E.SX. collapsed the city had a $19 million expo acre. The cid may no ret the money back 3 Decrie It has discovered that city officials didoY take physical possession of the E.S.M. tecurhies apparemay pledged against the bans. It Isn't clear how, the dry came to select E.S.M. for investment, W some documents released by We city suggest that Toledo officials lent nooey, to E.S.M. without taking counter bids. Scott Searle, one of the Toledo officials involved In placing city funds, declined to comment whether be or others In similar positions took competitive bids. "I don't want to gel Into that," be says. Similarly bad hit by the E.S.M. col. lapse Is Beaumont, Texas. The depressed Part city on the 'Texas Gull Nast faces a = mullion loss from the government ecu - Miss H purchased hum B.S.M. The 320 million represents one -11M of Beawndet's a®usi Slip million budges. 'ne Impart of the loss on the abort - term Operations of the dry is devastating." says Hugh Eamesi, assistant city man- ager. "We bad planned on using that money r��p�� as well caneededcapital Improvve- meats." As a it" late tut Rev Buttons had to canal a SII million mlmletpal band OIF I gofinance Iarywater endsewage pwJecta aid a Sl -1111- purchase of hew tracks And equipment. it Won ftee ki font ud say oeteases. 0ty Maoaeer Kul Nollenberger has tried to set an ex- ample for the city's "austerity program„ by &WJU his STg M&.yeu RIM 3DB. Robert NashlInger, the city's finance di - sector who was responsible for plating the city's Inaey with ES.kf., has resigned Over the aurdaL Mr. Nachloger cadets -t be reached for comment. In Flor" the city of Tamarac Y fac- ing a sr mom Doss of its E.SJrC Inrnt- mena "We're sot going to be investing in repurchase agreements at all;' san Ste. Dien Wood, the director of fi-mca "Ontil there's acme moa tegnlalln of this whole bbgzY. the ialy ate place fir money is In your hand or in your rnamnm.' The city had been planning to sell M millbo in bonds for a new police kation and city MU, but Dow it has decided to Postpone the bond Issue or 30 to 10 days, Mr. wood aakk IAIM tO Cities Thee were two fits -w Incentives that apparently eaeiurew but goreumsa not to take pmesalm of the government securities that were collateral for their ba- to LLM. E.S.M., like other floveranent•aecurl• tis dealers, oflem4 a higher Interest rare on repurchase agreements In which the customer didn't take possession of the col- lateral. And to take poaession of the secu- rities. E.S.M. customers had to have an ex. pssive govesment•txuritles account met up at a major bank. The AMU" Interest. of as much as as"uarfer of a Perelman point. wasn't MAO Incentive for hill hisfitutions that 11reW had bank ncdunts to baadk gov emient tecuritim The accounts am Dec. maty because ownership of Treasury se, curitles It transferred deetrdotcany, by changing computer -account entries. 5-5-.2- Bat the tort at setting; up such ea ac• count was prohibitive for a wall player in the market_ Nein Cumeen, a vice prad- deal at Irving Trwst Co. In New York, says the minimum charge to set up such an ac- count would be more than $1.000, plus charge for each transaction. "11 wouldn't be terribly practical to gel up a account for las than $10 million that did less than one trade a month," abe said. Of 77 gov ernments or government agencies that were doing business with S.SAL as of tau Dec. 31, W but one had lent leu than 915 MWhm. according to caul papers filed by the SEC, and eight Int M malum or lem securitla•hoduary executives ex• pressed amazement at the way acme mu• sklpalWa dean with six. puucu- farly in Ilgld of the losses suffered Wt year lo Ucas capital's call -pee. "It azar louocelvable to me that you could g" In a paddma wbere you don't have either the money or the computer blip," sad the president of one firm with a large govern• ment•securtua hostess. "That's Just crazy" . Adds Mt Cunneen: "ll don't know of any major Irm lWtlm that would nes cow alder dathg a repurehase agroemant wIN- at havIng a lttnqueatl0oed seeurllyl Inter sat in fate collateral." last June, E.S.M. tried to drum up buunea among credit unlaos but was blocked by the National Credit Ualm Ano olatlm, which Insures aid LeguWa more Ido 1$,100 credit unlet It was very difficult to tnderstamd ex - acus' what t!ry were Offering.- ays Rob en rawer. deputy general rowel of the assoolatim. 'lye aspected at the time, VA were later ptwed right. that they made It Nary On purpose." The E.S.M. offl• dab, be adds, "represented that what they were offering was an absolutely risk-free method for a credit union to Increase the yield on Its government securities" two to three percentage points. The credit union association saw two problems with E.S.I.'s proposal. Mr. Fen- ner says. E.S.M. couldn't provide a "paper rail" showing that the Treasury bills to be used In a deal would be placed In afekeep- Ing with a third party. which Mr. Fenner ayes was'becessary for the security of the credit union E S.S.M. filled.'• The other problem. be ays, war that it appeared unit the only way E.S.I. could promise such an Interest rate spread was o eats• match aaturitles by bornvwin9 money at short•irtn rtes while lending at long-term rates. U lateral rales went up, S.S.M. would lose money. Other State Funds The Crisis at the Ohio Deposit Guarsn• tee flmd Illustrates We risks fazing Neu stafe•Charlered but industry -owned end - tis: Wye lasses at one or more of the in. need latimtions can deplete a fwd's re - Omuta Omta and undermine cmGdence In other fund•lasured Institutions. Nonetheless, officials of thrift Insurance heads In Pennsylvania. Massachusetts, Maryland Lod North Carolina—the other states that have them—said the problems to Ohio were unique and couldn't be R located In their states. They said they haven't seen any spillover from the evens In Ohio so far. and although there sae cer. tarn to be Inquiries from nervous con• stoners, they don't expect significant de- Point eposit withdrawals. These officials said their Insurance is as safe or safer than that of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp, and the Federal Savings and loan Insurance Corp.. which Insure the vast majority of deposits at commercial backs and savings =tub=. q For one thing, the hued oMcials explain that their reserves are larger to compsH. am to Insuredthe federal *Wts flan art those of billion In agencies. They Insure about 977 with food resources oofabout So posits at a5 thrlb million. 71e aggregate 37, ratio of fund assets to bullied deposit$ compares with coverage Was around 1% at the FDIC and FSLIC, however, the FDIC and FSLIC are lmpfic• t. Perhaps come Important. thMY backed by the U.S. e W m%m. • fund officials said I* monitor their Usti. Won very Closely and address potential Problems earlier than do the federal to. Matters. And they ago their htatittrtira are LOW healthier sed hatertaAW: aReposrAre Complicated Transactions With Cash and Government Securities By Tim Mars SwffneaenerofTMwua.Sr =Jou"" The business of ESA Government Sr cuitla Involved repurchase agreements— known as "repos"—and reverse repur- chase epurchase agreemas—known a "reverse repos." The terra actually describe the sun comPlIcal twoaep cull-aed•seeu- Mies transaction as aeon from the differ- mat iffermat perspectives at the parties Involved. The transaction is an exchange of cash Bad brief period (often just a day or a few days), followed by the return of the securi- lies and crib to their original holders. The interest rate paid on the securities for the period of the exchange is negoU• ated by the parties. Should the securities' market value decline during the switch, the risk is borne by the original land Wd. mule) owner of the securities. The Two Sides —Repo. The party with the cash agrees to buy the securities for the term of the deal and then to resell the seuulties for A slightly higher negotiated price Intended b provide a profit, Interest In effect. —Reverse Repo. The party with the a& $rides sells them, then buys there bath at the agreed price. He risks the posslbBlly, that the market value of the securities will drop while they are out of his bads. B.S.N. entered Into many Such transit. Lim Involving billions of dollars In rash And securities. It was on different sides of the bargain at one time or another. When on the reverse repo side, It dealt with in. vesors, such as local governments with excess cash sloshing around that they waled to Invest profitably. When doing repos. E.S.M. dealt with securities dealers and thrift insUWBam Out wanted to rase cash temporarily from their securities holdings without fiquldating them to get IL The governments supplied the cash In B.S.M.'s business; the thrifts supplied the securities. E.S.M.'s profit prospects depended on whether It could get more money from its repo agreements with the thrifts tun it paid out under Its reverse repo with the local governments. Of wase, thecompany also assumed the market -price risk on the securities during the cause of Its agree• ments with local governments. If prices ruse, 3111. made money: It they fell, ob. visuaiy. ES.L IML Sources of lasses Information so far made public doesn't Identity the sources of millions of dollars In losses rolled up by E.SIL starting In tan, but there are some clues: —Thoma Tew, S.S.M.'s cmut•ap• pointed receiver, charges In one lawsuit that S.SA's officers and directors were Improperly lent more Nan 936 mWlon by the firm, despite Its precarious financial condition. In other court papers, Mr. Tew has asserted that additional million of the firm's money was waged or misappropri. aged. —The receiver and the SEC charge, hu• thermore, that the same securities were pledged to more than one of the company's local•govem went customers. By the end of 1984, according to a receiver's document, S.S.M. held $1.32 billion In government to- curides under deal struck with thrifts, while records show that local governments believed they had bought $1.62 billion In such securities. By Feb. 28, the receiver said, Indicated losses had grown to 1315 million, apportioned among 13 government wilts and five thrifts. .55012_ MINUTES OF STAFF MEETING March 6, 1985 Items for the agenda of March 12 include: First consideration of the ordinance amending the Electrical Code with recommendation that the three readings be waived. Motion approving Statement of Policy rrom Housing Amend budget by adding two positions in transit Resolution amending the budget to add a full-time position to Assisted Housing Set public hearings on Street Repair Project, Sanitary Landfill Project, and the Outfall Relief Sewer System Rehabilitation Project Motion approving taxicab stand Public hearing authorizing delivery of deed for Elm Grove Park Resolution on Elm Grove Park City Charter ordinance with request that readings be waived to allow for codification before election Ordinance with respect to campaign finance disclosure Set public hearing for April 9 to dispose of a portion of Mormon Trek right-of-way Public hearing to rezone property near Izaak Walton League Road Public hearing to dispose of a portion of right-of-way adjacent to 624 South Gilbert and resolution conveying vacated property. Public hearing on disposition of permanent box culvert easements in First and Rochester Subdivision. Resolution authorizing release of easements Public hearing to dispose of portion of permanent flowage easement for Ralston Creek North Branch Detention Basin Public hearing on urban environment policies First consideration of three ordinances rezoning Melrose Lake Area Second consideration of sign ordinance Resolution approving preliminary plat of Kennedy's Waterfront Addition Resolution approving an amendment to preliminary and final LSNRD for National Computer Systems, Inc. Resolution adopting preferred alignment for Foster Road at intersection with North Dubuque Road Public hearing on Southgate Development IRBs and resolution to proceed with issuance and sale of bonds Public hearing on Kirkwood Circle Improvements Project and resolution approving plans, specifications, form of contract and cost estimate Gas and electric franchises 553 Minutes of Staff Meeting March 6, 1985 Page 2 The Director of Human Relations advised that postings of summer jobs will begin soon and reminded the staff that no special preference will be given to friends or relatives of City employees. The Senior Center Coordinator inquired about funds deposited with IPERS. She had been furnished information that no interest is paid on these funds during the first year. The Human Relations Department will check into this matter and furnish a memo to the staff. Prepared by: Lorraine Saeger / S5.3 Informal Council Meeting IIATC' M. -h 5 IQF F Iowa-Illino Bristol Dri Road/Foster IRB Area Legislative Mobile Hom Airport Bo Hoiiciesln MINUTES OF STAFF MEETING March 13, 1985 The referrals from the informal and formal Council meetings were distri- buted for review and discussion (copy attached). A copy of a letter from Public Technology, Inc., was distributed to the staff. This letter explains a technology award program. The City Manager asked the staff to review projects in their departments which might be responsive to the types of things PTI is looking for. Submissions for this program are due April 10. A brief discussion was held regarding ways in which the commitment and success of the administrative and confidential staff of the City could be made more visible. This commitment pays off in many ways, and this should be brought to the attention of the public to improve the image some people have of City government. The City Manager advised that the Management Advisory Panel may be reacti- vated. Some members of the former group have resigned and replacements need pers ns who are expertsfinwtheiras kfield whoed to mcould adviseto the tonMpersonnelanager mes of and financial matters. A videotape was shown which has been prepared by Iowa City and Cedar Rapids for the Saturn Project. The tape was primarily put together by the University of Iowa and Kirkwood Community College. Parts of it are suitable for use for other economic development efforts. Prepared by: =%C�_ Lorraine Saeger ,553 Informal Council DATE: March 11. W W )m S 02 az Parking - I North Dubw Regular Cou DATE: March 12, 1 UW WW 3 02 az S1 Burlington repair job Sign Ordina Letter of P Sidewalk A: Tree Remova Electrical Southgate I Ace Junk Ya i MINUTES OF STAFF MEETING March 20, 1985 Copies of the referrals from the informal staff meeting were distributed to the staff for review and discussion (copy attached). The Senior Center Coordinator asked if any information was being prepared ures of IPERS. She was advised that a regarding the investment proced memorandum is being prepared by the Human Relations Office and will be furnished to the staff in the near future. The Assistant City Manager advised the staff that the program division I! statements have been submitted to the Finance Department. He thanked the staff for their assistance in the preparation of these statements. Prepared by Lorraine Saeger 9 ,5553 lntormal Council Meeting nATF *March 19._19Bi PENDING COUNCIL ITEMS 3 SUBJECT 0 Jaz O o� ¢ REFTORED DATE � H W 2 w � H o a COMMENTS/STATUS CDBG Funding 3-19 P&PD $3,000 from contingency fund to Headstart (HACAP) operating expenses approved. Harlocke/Weeber Rezoning 3-19 PUD Public Wor s Rezoning items for April 9 agenda. Meet with Chuck Muller re. alterna- tives for access and related costs. for restricting access to Harlocke. Street Naming Policy 3-19 P&PD/ ACM Reschedule for informal discussion. MINUTES OF STAFF MEETING March 27, 1985 The City Manager advised that there would be a special Council meeting next week to set a public hearing on conveying land to Hartwig Motors. The next regular meeting will be on April 9. If any department has an item which needs immediate Council consideration, it can be added to this special agenda. A memorandum from the City Manager regarding building security was distri- buted to the staff. The Manager explained that during recent public meetings the entire Civic Center has been open. In order to maintain better security the only doors which will be open for public meetings will be the main lobby doors and the doors into the Council Chambers. When more than 50 people attend the meeting, the staff person present will be responsible for unlocking the door between the Chambers and the Conference Room and also the door at the head of the stairs on the east side of the building. This is in compliance with the Fire Code. The building maintenance staff will lock all doors (with the exception of the main lobby) after five o'clock. The Assistant City Manager briefly discussed the topic of space needs. A copy of the recommendations of the space committee will be furnished to the staff for information and review. The department heads are to contact the Assistant City Manager if there are problems. A copy of an article titled, "Do Accidents Really Happen" was distributed to the staff. Prepared by: Lorraine Saeger 553 i i Ozill i 85 S' M T W TH f S 78AM-Magistrate 2 Court (Chambers) 9gAgM-AFuSCME Job lOAM-Staff Mtg. (Goof Room) SAM -Magistrate (ContaRoom) Court (Chambers) 7:30PM-Informal P6Z (Senior Ctr) 6:30PM-Informal Council (Chamber )7:30PM-Riverfront 7:30PM-Formal P6Z (Chambers) Comm (Chambers) . 8 q 10 101-Staf Mtg It 7�- 13 BAM-Magistrate 8:30AM-Housing PM -Senior r Com Room 8AM-Mag Court (Chambers) Court (Chambers) Appeals Board (Senior Ctr) (Public Lib) ppf-JCCOG B of 6:30PM-Informal Council (Chambers) g;30AM-Housing Como (public Lib Directors Transi 'q$pM-g= of 3'30PM-Air ort Com Adz (Chamberrsp) �Chambers� 7Conse 7(Chambersjcil Comm Rec6Ctr) vationces Comm Public Lib, •30PM-Historic Room ) Pres Com (Pub Lib " I6 17 I>T /9 Ao �� BAM-Mag strata BAM-Broadbapd g IgConf RoomMt9 8AM-Magt*stracourt bers) Court Chambers) Cocmm q�Cunun}ars )o Infp ], 7P&ZP(tChamnera) 3:30PM-CCN (Rec 4PM-Design Review L� 7jChembers)al P62 4A1JrH $an Enyiree reryeeB(Publi ) (Rec Ctr Rm B 6.30PM-InffoCma Council (C er ) 1t dZ d3 6 4 a7 11 BCcour[9(IChframrbmeerrs) OAM-Staff Mtg B -Magistrate Ccurt (Chambers) (Conf Room) 6al Counciln( Chamber 4PM-Library Board (Public Library) 7.3pPM-Council tChambers) 7.30PM-H n Ri h Comm Cir (Sanror �p a9 3o AM-Magstrate Court We ars 6:30PM-Informal 7:30PM-Informal Council (Chambers P6Z (Senior Ctr) OM O P E R A T I N G B U D G E T N. �1 I=, C I T Y O F MAR 15 1985 MARIAN CLERK (3R , William Ambrisca Larry Baker Kate Dickson CITY MANAGER Neal G. Berlin t1 FISCAL YEAR 1986 JULY 1, 1985 - JUNE 30, 1986 I O W A C I T Y, I O W A CITY COUNCIL John McDonald Mayor Clemens Erdahl George Strait Ernest Zuber, Jr. FINANCE DIRECTOR Rosemary Vitosh I Resolution No. 85-60 A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE ANNUAL BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING JUNE 30, 1986. Be It Resolved by the Council of the City of IOWA CITY , Iowa: The annual budget for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1986, as ret forth In the Budget Summary Certificate and In the detailed budget in support thereof showing the revenue estimates and appropriation expenditures and allocations to programs and activities for said fiscal year Is adopted, and the clerk isdirected to make the filings required by law and to set up his books In accordance with the summary and details as adopted. Passed and approved on March 12, 1985, by the following vote: (list names) Ayes: Zuber Noyes: Alnnn Ambrisco Baker Dickson Erdahl McDonald Strait Mayor Attest: /✓ , Clerk Receked & Appicvost By T leaJ D3pe ret I rw+-+rY rn • rriv .......................» �— oo w sur n KNY Ipr101 COIr111 Yi M� AI �YY Ywry In 1Y Y•Cpr�W 011 Of] 001 001 OY Y1l OL OY my m tl ON • 00.001L11 1•• WI 011 ON 010 YL 010 m pp 010 Yc ns oti •c ar. .......................» �— oo w sur n ^y..rr Yw Pro �..v uuv:Ei cEli1FIUTE fUffflARY ON A r►sx��fAilf ur 1 ISU_AMU 10U i BUDGET IN BRIEF Consistent with the practice of previous years, all revenue estimates are conservative. The uncertainty of 1 Federal and State revenues continues to require a conservative approach. In budget preparation it is impor- tant to ensure that the level of revenue projected will actually materialize. _ The expenditure budget for all operating funds in FY86 is $29,867,899. Many reductions were made in depart- mental budget requests. In particular, departments were not allowed to budget for emergency costs. Because of this, budgets may need to be amended more frequently. It is deemed more appropriate to amend a budget based on actual need rather than to allocate funding for every eventuality which, in most instances, will not occur. GENERAL GOVERNMENTAL OPERATIONS — General Governmental Operations consist of the General Fund, the Debt Service Fund, the Trust 8 Agency Fund, the Equipment Maintenance Fund, and the Special Revenue Funds. A. PROPERTY TAX The City's property tax request of $10,494,048 for FY86 will be levied as follows: FY86 FY84 Dollars Per $1000 Assessment 7.718 Dollars Per $1000 General 6,055,152* 8.100 Trust 6 Agency 1 255 169 1.691 Subtotal Tort Liability 79310;321 66,369 T3f .089 Debt Service 1,372,150 1.848 Transit 133,638 180 Subtotal 8,882,478 1T. Ag. Bldgs. 6 Land 8,106 3.004 aaaaaa Total 8,890,584 FY86 10,494,048 aaeaaaaoaa *Includes monies and credits of $28,816 and military credit of $13,800. "Includes monies and credits of $27,620 (one-half, $13,810, was received in FY84) and military credit of $13,800. Assessment Dollars Per $1000 6,901,472** 7.718 673 652 .758 7,575,' 324 8 .W 147,338 .166 1,626,935 1.830 159 991 .180 ,5099588' T�Si f 9,386 3.004 aaaaev 9,518,974 3.004 vaaaa-=ov 10,494,048 aaeaaaaoaa *Includes monies and credits of $28,816 and military credit of $13,800. "Includes monies and credits of $27,620 (one-half, $13,810, was received in FY84) and military credit of $13,800. FY86 Assessment Dollars Per $1000 7,247,084* 7.510 T64 617 .693 4Lf;741 355,300 _FM .370 1,872,145 1.952 .360 ,T83�Aa;5daf TO:A'B5 9.508 3.004 10,494,048 aaeaaaaoaa *Includes monies and credits of $28,816 and military credit of $13,800. "Includes monies and credits of $27,620 (one-half, $13,810, was received in FY84) and military credit of $13,800. Total assessed valuation in Iowa City increased from $1,124,655,722 to $1,174,927,158 as of January 1, 1984, or an increase of 4.5%. The majority of the increase resulted from real property growth (new construction). The taxable valuation is computed by applying the State's rollback factor to the total assessed valuation. The rollback factor is designed to limit taxable valuation for the State, as a whole, to a 4% annual increase. The County Auditor makes adjustments to property valuations and applies the rollback factors, and property credits to arrive at the taxable valuations. Iowa City's taxable valuation increased from $888,838,026 as of January 1, 1983, to $959,316,614 as of January 1, 1984. This is a 7.9% increase in taxable valuation. In preparing this operating budget, property taxes were held to a 6% increase for the average residen- tial property owner, over FY85 taxes. The increase in taxable valuation for residential property was 4%. This is due to the rollback factor rising by 4% from FY85. The following chart shows how property taxes for the average residential property will be affected by the property tax levy recom- mended in the proposed budget. The average residential assessed valuation used in this chart is based on information obtained from the City Assessor. PROPERTY TAXES FOR AVERAGE RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY FY86 INCREASE (DECREASE) OVER FY84 FY85 FY86 FY85 FY84 AVERAGE RESIDENTIAL ASSESSED VALUATION 1-1-82 $57,679 1-1-83 $65,754 1-1-84 $65,754 0% 14% ROLLBACK FACTOR .672223 .698754 .724832 4% 8% TAXABLE VALUATION $38,773 $45,946 $47,661 4% 23% LEVY - ACTUAL/PROJECTED 11.908 10.652 10.885 2% (9%) PROPERTY TAXES $461.71 $489.42 $518.79 6% 12% i Property is reassessed every two years. FY85 was a reassessment year. The taxable valuation in FY861ir1 ` increased 4%, the amount that the rollback factor increased. It was therefore possible to increase the tax levy by only 2% in order to hold the increase for a homeowner's actual tax dollars to a 6% increase over FY85 taxes. The rollback factors are computed by the State. They are intended to equalize the total state-wide property values at a 4% increase each year. For FY85, the rollback was .698754 on residential property and is .724832 for FY86. The rollback on commercial properties was .917230 for FY85 and is .954242 for FY86. The City also will receive revenue from taxes on agricultural buildings and land located within the City limits. As provided by State law, the tax on this property is $3.00375 per $1000 of assessed value. The assessed taxable value for agricultural property is $3,165,122 and will yield revenue of $9,508. Property taxes which fund General Fund operations include the following levies: FY85 FY86 General $6,901,472 $7,247,084 Tort Liability 147,338 355,300 Trust 6 Agency 673,852 664,657 Ag. Bldgs 6 Land 9 386 .�.�.�. 9�.58 $7,732',0483 ,27s;3d4 These tax askings will increase 7.0% ($544,501) in FY86. Excluding the substantial increase in the Tort Liability Levy for increased insurance costs, the tax askings increase by 4.4%. Another source of revenue used for General Fund operation is the Monies and Credits replacement fund. Formerly a state law levied a tax on certain monies and credits and monied capital. This tax was repealed and the State established a replacement fund which provides to cities the approximate amount of revenue being received at the time the tax was repealed. In FY86, the City will receive $28,816. A Military Service Credit replacement has been established by the State which returns to cities part of the property tax lost to the Military Service Tax Credit. In FY86, this fund will return $13,800 to Iowa City for General Fund purposes. These monies are appropriated to cities by the State Treasurer in proportion to the money allocated by the State for the military service tax credit. The General Fund property tax levy is used for the support of many services, such as police, fire, library, park and recreation services. The levy cannot exceed $8.10 per $1000 of assessed valuation. The City also levies property tax for other purposes. These include Trust d Agency, Tort Liability, Transit and Debt Service. These funds can be utilized only for the purpose for which they are levied. The Trust 8 Agency property tax levy is used for the payment of pension and employee benefits. These include social security (FICA), the Iowa Public Employees Retirement System (IPERS), the Police and Fire Pension contributions, health insurance, life insurance, worker's compensation insurance premiums and unemployment compensation. State regulations allow cities to budget for FICA, (PERS, health insurance and life insurance under the Trust b Agency Levy only when the $8.10 maximum levy has been reached in the General Levy. In FY86, the General Levy is below the maximum levy limit, so Iowa City will be paying most benefit costs out of the General Levy. Police and Fire Pension, worker's compensation insurance premiums, and unemployment compensation costs will be paid from the Trust b Agency Levy in FY86. A special levy, Tort Liability, is provided to pay the cost of certain insurance coverage. This includes comprehensive general liability, motor vehicle liability, public official liability, errors and ommissions, and false arrest insurance. The tort liability levy of $355,300 reflects the cost of insurance premiums and anticipated judgments for FY86. Insurance companies are raising the premiums for business liability coverages. Iowa City has experienced a recent 30% increase in premiums. _ The Transit Levy was established in FY64 at $.18 per $1,000 assessed valuation. State law permits the _ use of a transit levy for funding the operation of a municipal transit system. The levy cannot exceed $.54 per $1000 of assessed valuation. The intent of instituting the Transit Levy was to allow for the phase out of Federal Revenue Sharing for transit funding. The levy will increase in FY86 from $.18 to $.36. Funding from Federal Revenue Sharing for transit operations will drop from $240,451 in FY85 to $67,072 in FY86. Federal Revenue Sharing funding has been approved by Congress through September 1986, which means the City may need to consider another increase in the Transit levy in FY87 in the event that Revenue Sharing is not extended. The Debt Service levy provides funds for the payment of the principal and interest on general obliga- tion bonds of the City. It can also be utilized to fund the payment of any judgments against the _ City, unless other funding sources are provided by State law. This levy increased in FY85 because the City is now paying on bonds issued in FY83. Another bond issue is planned for spring 1985. This results in an increase in debt service costs for FY86. B. GENERAL FUND - REVENUES OTHER THAN PROPERTY TAX 1. Intergovernmental Revenue Assa major source of revenue. This udes both andiStateeassistance.' governmental according to population. Federal Iowa City'spopulation is 50,508, as reported in the 1980 Census. a. The bank franchise tax is a State tax levied on the net income of financial institutions. The State etains 55% and 40% to the countyr rwithin which fit horiginated. The FY86is tax with the iprojener ctioneof $40,000 isividd with 60% ocity upon actual receipts in past years. the b on $6.07 pertcapita l($306f584). Iross n FY86 theState estimateuor is $5.70stores. perlcapita 5($287 estimate was based C. State Municipal Assistance distributes State revenues on a ratio of each city's population to total State lisibasedTon $ payment percannot capitaexceed ($339.919). if Thisthe isc$11,617rmore than thelevy. amount used in the FY85 budget. Both the amount and continuation of the program in FY86 could be a topic of discussion for the State Legislature in the upcoming session. d J Beginning Countyin lCouncilhnson of Government e(JCCOG)ional Pandnthe Citylofion Iowa C ty)waswas madereplaced responsible for maintenance d byIJCCOG in FY8al 6 amounts toeJCCOG $161,886 with Iowaet is iCity'sdIn sharehbeing City's7 599. Total _ e. The FY86 projection for Federal Revenue Sharing is $572,267. This is the same amount as is being received in the current entitlement period. f. Road Use Tax collected by the State from the registration of motor vehicles, fuel tax, license fees and the use tax on motor vehicles, trailers and accessories and equipment is apportioned to _. eachn a ratio of on to ll Iowa budgetedies. Thin FY85e per capita estimate 2. Other Revenue _ The City establishes services charges both by contract and fee schedules. The Fire Department revenues include the Fire Protection Contract with the University of Iowa ($374,512 to the General Fund and $92,810 to the Trust 6 Agency Fund for a total of $467,322) and Library services include $116,585 for services to Johnson County, 10% of the Library's operating budget. Recreation revenue of $365,078 includes admis- sions, lessons, entry fees and pool revenue. Other revenue is derived from activities such as police escort service, animal control fees, zoning and subdivision fees. In FY86, revenue from licenses and permits is budgeted at $266,341. Most of this revenue will come from building and rental permits or beer and liquor permits and licenses. Other sources of revenue are peddler's, electrician's, plumber's and animal licenses and burial permits. The FY86 budgeted revenue from fines and forfeitures of $308,147 includes $145,000 for parking fines, library fines ($40,088) which are assessed for overdue or damaged property, and funds collected by the magistrate's court ($123,059) for violation of the City or State codes such as motor vehicle violations and animal control violations. i Use of money and property revenue comes from various sources. Interest income is projected at a 10.25% interest yield ($68,982). General Fund miscellaneous revenues are composed of refunds, reimbursements of expenses and damages, miscellaneous sales and commissions or concessions. The commission from the cable TV franchise fee is projected to be $80,000; this will be higher if the franchise fee increases to 5%. The remaining miscellaneous revenues total $52,297 for all 41 operating divisions, an average of $1,276 per division. C. GENERAL FUND - EXPENDITURES The proposed General Fund budget is $13,587,157 or an increase of 6.2% over the FY85 budget. Increases 1n the General Fund expenditure budget were minimized as much as possible because of limited revenues in the General Fund. A comparison of percentage changes by major classification of expenditure follows: Actual Estimate % Budget % FY84 FY85 Change FY86 Change Personal Services $ 7,393,671 $ 7,998,049 8.2% 8,590,729 7.4% Commodities 518,217 574,235 10.8% 591,033 2.9% Services 6 Charges 2,344,801 2,551,459 8.8% 2,581,456 1.2% Capital Outlay 576,857 796,298 38.0% 748,632 (6.0)% - Transfers 7.8115-2-5- 872 752 11.7% 1 075 307 23.2% TOTAL $}£142.79} 10.1% 13,397,1}7 6.2% 1. Personal Services Personnel costs are primarily controlled by collective bargaining agreements. Employees of the City are represented by three unions: AFSCME (Local 0183), the Police Labor Relations Organization of Iowa City, and the International Association of Firefighters (Local 1610). i The majority of City employees is represented by AFSCME. This Union is comprised of two bargaining _ units, one composed exclusively of Library employees and the other composed of employees in all other departments. All supervisory, confidential, temporary and other employees who are excluded by law in Chapter 20 of the Code of Iowa are excluded from the units and from the terms, conditions or applica- tion of the Agreement. Sworn police officers and firefighters are also excluded. AFSCME settled with a two year contract that calls for a 4% across-the-board salary increase each year, sane modifications to the health insurance plan, single dental coverage, a freeze on the value of sick -leave payout at the termination of employment with the City, change in vacation accrual for 15-20 years of service to be the same as that of Administrative/Confidential employees with the same number of years. Sworn police officers are represented by the Police Labor Relations Organization of Iowa City. The bargaining unit is composed of all Iowa City police officers. Exempt from the unit are the police chief, deputy chief, captains, sergeants, and other confidential, administrative, supervisory and less than half-time employees. The Police Officers Union settled with a two year contract that starts July 1, 1985 and ends June 30, 1987. Their settlement includes 4% across-the-board salary increases each year, modifications to the health insurance plan, single dental coverage, a freeze on value of sick -leave payout at the termina- tion of employment with the City, shoe and cleaning allowance changed from $70 to $100 per officer. The firefighters are represented by the International Association of Firefighters. The bargaining unit is composed of firefighters, lieutenants, and captains. Exempt from the unit are the fire chief, - fire marshal and battalion chiefs. The firefighters settled with a contract effective between July 1, 1985, and June 30, 1986. The new contract includes a 3.9% across-the-board salary increase, modifications to the health insurance plan, single dental coverage, $100 compensation for maintaining EMT certification, and a freeze on the value _ of sick -leave payout upon termination of employment with the City. Employees who are administrative, supervisory or otherwise ineligible for collective bargaining are covered by the Personnel Rules and Regulations. Some are eligible for Civil Service. Salaries and benefits are determined by the City Council upon the recommendation of the City Manager. Guidelines for increases are set by the City Manager, with the amount of the increase determined by the depart- ment head, and final approval of the City Manager. A specific proposal for salary increases for these employees will be decided by the City Council. The percentage increase between the FY86 estimate and FY85 Budget is based upon projected salary increases and projected costs for fringe benefits. The salary projection includes both a July 1st across the board increase and the salary adjustments (step increases) which are scheduled to occur during the fiscal year. Pending contract settlements may necessitate revisions in the salary budget amounts. Council approved changes that affect the personal services in the General Fund. In FY85, the City will will also reduce the e the part-timeCity ndochargessition budgettbyf$47 000 forsia,netdbudget6increase195 in Fof6$9,1951) Expanded Service level requests that were approved by Council include $300 in the Broadband Telecorrmu- nications budget tant nce Director, $18,891 in the Fire budget for nan AdministrativnAdministrativeinistration $13,933 et for an Afor sadding iaa1/2 Recreation Supervisor position. 2. Commodities I! The previous chart indicates that commodity costs show a modest increase in FY86. Commodities mainly consist of office and cleaning supplies, and maintenance and repair materials for buildings, streets and equipment. Generally, supplies and materials are projected at a 3% increase over FY85. Police patrol fuel costs decreased because of low fuel prices and fuel-efficient cars. 3. Services and Charges Services and Charges cover expenses for insurance premiums, payments to Aid to Agencies, printing, various service contracts, and gas, electricity and telephone. Overall, the budget for services and charges ,rises only 1% over FY85. $47,000 was deducted from legal services as a result of hiring a full-time City Attorney. Some items are budgeted at higher increases: insurance premiums at 30%, gas and electricity up 6%, telephone up 20%. Payments to Aid to Agencies as determined by Council for iFY86, are as follows: ~ Big Brothers/Big Sisters $ 24,091 - Crisis Center Intervention 8,460 Crisis Center Emergency 8,902 Domestic Violence Project 12,000 Elderly Services Agency 27,836 HACAP 2,277 Mayor's Youth Employment 29,000 Willow Creek Neighborhood Ctr. 9,400 D Rape Victim Advocacy 9,865 (f) _ United Action for Youth 38 592 I TOTAL AGENCY FUNDING $170,4Z3 �) Contingency fund 3 468 TOTAL FUNDS 4. Capital Outlay Capital outlay expenditures will decrease 1n FY86. Major capital outlay expenditures include $73,200 for upgrading the current computer system, $30,000 for micro -computer purchases, $27,000 for replacing several items in the fire department, $18,847 for recreation capital outlay, $92,000 for replacing police vehicles, $310,000 for the asphalt overlay program, $129,280 for Library materials and $12,000 in various budgets for typewriter replacement. A typewriter replacement plan is scheduled for FY86; the new typewriters will be allocated to the major typing position in various departments with the old typewriters transferred to lower use areas. The computer system upgrade will continue the funding for this first phase which was funded in the FY85 Budget. The budgeted micro -computer purchases continue the effort began in the FY85 Budget to provide funding for the purchase of micro -computers for various departments and a computer system for the Police Department. Council approved expanded service level requests for filing cabinets, total cost of $890. 5. Transfers This includes primarily the General Fund subsidies for Transit operations, the Airport and JCCOG. It also includes a transfer to Transit in the amount of the transit property tax levy. State law mandates that property taxes received from the transit levy be receipted into the General Fund and then transferred to transit operations. The large increase in transfers is due to the increase in the Transit Levy from $159,991 in FY85 to $345,354 in FY86. The operating subsidy for Transit increased from $354,653 in FY85 to $446,573 in FY86. That large increase was offset by the elimination of an operating subsidy for refuse collection in FY86. subsidy isThe budgetedefornthly refuseate will be in FY86 whilecaeased to subsidy oft$96,195ewasObudgetedself-funded n m user fees; no iFY85 GENERAL FUND YEAR-END BALANCE The estimated General Fund year-end balance for June 30, 1986 is computed as follows: U 6-30-84 Actual Balance $1,826,381 Less: 6-30-84 Encumbrances Amendments (102,252) (133.477_L 6-30-84 Carryovers and Adjusted 6-30-B4 Balance ' FY85: Estimated Receipts $12,7621825 12,792,793 P9 g68 Estimated Expenditures 6-30-84 Estimated Balance ' FY86: Budgeted Receipts $13,213548 587.157 (373,609) Budgeted Expenditures Less Reserved Balances: (23,920) Broadband Telecommunications (241,734) Parkland Acquisition Reserve (62,450) Recreation Facility Reserve 30 000 Deposits Escrow Estimated Unreserved 6-30-86 Balance s===.=_,_ The estimated 000 nce that the SFund budget has been the has tried to n in prepared using the ssumptioo that the past the0-86 p stbalance severaliyearsr,ethehGeneralan be bthatcpropertye is dtaxes ed to arevnot unappropriated opr aiedtheafirst quarter ofuthe w fis al year5due�toOtheTfacthis neld how expenditures have exceeded for cashchart received until October. The following shows cash flow needs or receipts in the first quarter of recent years. July/September July/September Shortfall Receipts Fiscal Year Receipts Expenditures in FY85 $1,814,963 $3,722,020 ($1,907,057) $3,123,522 ($1,920,400) FY84 $1,203,122 $1,354,860 $2,694,988 (51,340,128) FYB3 964,788 $2,402,406 (51,437,618 ($1,084,531 Fyg $1,398,018 $2,482,549 The $700,000 year end balance now provides for less than 50% of the shortfall. The remainder is funded internally by balances in other funds until property taxes are received in October. It is becoming I increasingly difficult each year to fund the shortfall internally as the other available fund balances previously used to fund the shortfall continue to decrease. Three prime examples of fund balance used in the past are the Transit Replacement Reserve, the Pollution Control Operating Fund and the Parking — Operating Fund. The Transit Reserve has been depleted due to its funding of the new Transit Facility. The Pollution Control Fund balance will be used for future sewer plant improvements and the Parking fund balance will be used for parking facility improvements. The increase in the ending balance is due primarily to an available excess unreserved balance that existed at the end of FY84. This excess balance resulted because actual expenditures were less than budgeted and actual receipts were more than budgeted. — It should be noted that the FY86 operating Budget for the General Fund still shows a shortfall in avail- able revenues for the funding of budgeted expenditures. For this reason, very few expanded service levels _ for General Fund activities were approved. The approval of expanded service levels only increases the potential annual revenue shortfalls in future years. Council approved those expanded service levels that have probable and estimable revenues to fund them and those that greatly improve the efficiency of a divi- sion's work. It should be the City's goal in the future to approve a balanced budget for the General Fund in which revenues equal expenditures. - The following bar chart shows how receipts have exceeded or fallen short of expenditures in the General Fund in past years and for future years I projections. The bars above the line show receipts exceeding expenditures while the bars below the line show a shortfall in receipts. The City is now experiencing revenue shortfalls. The projections show excess revenues starting in FY88. The projections assume an annual inflationary expenditure increase of between 4 and 5%, do not include the funding of any expanded service levels and assume an annual increase in taxable assessed valuation of 8%. If expenditures increase more than projected or if assessed valuations increase at a lower rate than projected, or if State and or Federal revenues decrease or are discontinued, the revenue shortfalls could possibly extend to fiscal years past FY87. I 6100 GENUAL MID ABCsim MR IVA=) DISmsofm )00 600 500 400 D0D II 700 IQ IOU {F96� D IDD (21 1300 (600 !tlY lYIC 143 IVA MIS 11% M nA RM I= A(.iU4: IWOICLTIONS E The projected unreserved ending fund balance for the General Fund at 6-30-86, $828,971, is 6% of the total budgeted expenditures for the General Fund. The City will need to aim at this fund balance rather than UI _ the $700,000 balance in order to soften the blow of decreasing Federal assistance. DEBT SERVICE FUND This fund provides for the payment of the principal and interest on general obligations of the City. Funding is provided by the Debt Service Tax Levy and abatement from various Enterprise funds for their capital improvements which were funded by General Obligation Bonds. The tax levy experiences a substan- tial increase in tax dollars in FY86. The City's last bond issue was sold in December 1982. Bonds will be sold in 1985 to provide funding for capital improvements projects now in progress and projects sched- uled for the summer of 1985. The upcoming bond issue is projected to total $5 million and will provide funding for the following projects: Bridge Renovation Projects ($1,503,000), Clinton Street Reconstruc- tion il,terStorm a35(� t us,,tl Extension EasSide WaterStorge T k$053000bated by Water Revenue)variousSpecia Assessment projects ($485,000, 50% abated by special assessment revenue), Airport T-Ilangars ($220,000, abated by hangar rental income), various small projects ($253,000). As stated in the Fiscal Policy (Capital Improvements Program FY86-90), "Debt incurred as a general obligation of the City of Iowa City shall not exceed statutory limits: presently 5% of the market value of the taxable property within the corporate limits as established by the City Assessor." This schedule shows the relation of Iowa City's allowable debt margin and the debt incurred for FY83, FY84 and FY85: Total Allowable Debt Property Margin (5% of Debt at Debt as % of Valuation Total Property Val.) June 30 Allowable Debt Margin FY85 $1,174,921,158 $58,746,358 $10,500,000 18% FY84 $1,124,655,122 $56,232,786 $12,100,000 22% FY83 $ 960,921,776 $48,046,089 $13,400,000 28% F. TRUST AND AGENCY FUND This fund provides for the payment of pension and employee benefits. Funding is provided by the Trust and Agency Tax Levy. The costs covered by the Trust and Agency Levy in FY86 will include only the police and fire pension contributions, worker's compensation insurance premiums and unemployment compensation claims. The City will contribute 18.915% of all sworn police officers' salaries and 30.895% of all firefighters' salaries to the respective pension/retirement systems. G. OTHER FUNDS The Equipment Maintenance Fund provides maintenance for all City vehicles and equipment and rents vehicles to other City departments from a central vehicle pool. Funding is provided from the chargeback for the maintenance services and the rentals of vehicles. The Special Revenue Funds include JCCOG (Johnson County Council of Goverments), CDBG (Community Develop- ment Block Grant), Road Use Tax and Federal Revenue Sharing. The JCCOG fund is an agency fund as the City only acts as custodian for the fund and provides accounting records for the JCCOG organization. The CDBG Fund accounts for revenue from U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Community _ Development Block Grant programs and is restricted in use for eligible projects as defined by Federal regulations. The Road Use Tax Fund accounts for revenue from the State which is restricted to be used for only street maintenance, traffic engineering and street construction costs. In FY86, Road Use Tax revenues will fund only 86% of street maintenance and traffic engineering costs. Federal Revenue Sharing accounts for monies received from Federal Revenue Sharing entitlements. The FY86 Budget proposes using 42% of available revenue sharing for funding the contributions to the human service agencies and for transit operations. The remainder is reserved for capital improvement projects to be designated by the City Council, possibly Civic Center expansion. ENTERPRISE FUNDS The Enterprise Funds include Parking, Pollution Control, Water, Refuse, Landfill, Airport and Transit. These are utilities or services supported primarily from revenues for services provided. A. Enterprise Fund Revenues f. Rate increases for Refuse and Transit are scheduled to be in effect for FY86. The Refuse Collection currently receives a subsidy from the General Fund; the rate increase scheduled for FY86 will make J' this fund self-supporting. Refuse collection fees are budgeted in FY86 at $4.30 per month. The current charge is $3.50 per month. Transit operating assistance received from the Federal and State governments has continually been cut since FY83; this means the operating subsidy and bus fares will have to rise. The Transit budget includes a 25% (401 to 501) fare increase effective July 1, 1985. The operating subsidy will increase 20% (from $354,653 in FY85 to $446,573 in FY86). The FY86 budget includes Federal Section 9 Urban — Mass Transit Administration funding of $123,191 for transit operations. State operating assistance i t — for FY86 is projected at $70,552 as compared with actual State assistance in FY85 of $105,000. M Parkin revenue includes $1,104,050 from the parkingl,� _ Parking rates last increased ee October 1stre9B4. 9 permit lots and building rentals for a total ) nd to ramps and $391,993 from on and off-street meters,fines of _111 are of satisfy 9revenue requirementsrfor Parking rRevenue bonds. If he balance cat year-end his adequate,uthose fines will be transferred to the General Fund. Landfill fees will not increase in FY86. They will remain at the current rate of f7.50 per ton throughout FY86. FY85 as ed Walter and ei projected in the oFY85 Control Budget. These currently funds tareb both rself-supporting land be rate aincreases sed ngoccur in conjunction with increased annual operating costs and/or for capital improvements. Airport operations are depri marily operating eefltthe General Fund 2 % of total revnues)andfrom buildingrntals(9%ofttarevenues).Fwaernatvsexistforincreasing the Airport's own revenues. B. Enterprise Fund Expenditures 1. Operating Funds also pay the principal and interest due Parking. Sewer and Water revenues fund operations and revenue bond issues. In FY86, $414.514 of Sewer revenue, $72,854 of Water obligation bond issues their respective and $38,000 of Airport revenue will also be used to pay general revenue, which were sold to finance Sewer, Water and Airport projects. Enterprise Fund expenditure comparisons follow: % FY84 Actual FY85 Estimate % Chan a FY86 Budnet Chan e 214 (1,335,767 1,535,793 (2.5%) PollutionpControlsOperations 1,498,422 1,935,110 12.2% (3.7%) 1,988,055 2.7% Water Operations Collection Operations 2,009,303 23838 411,316 542108 3.5% 93.4% 562779 698,275 3.8% (12.3%) Refuse Landfill Operations 155,535 795, 24 173,417 11.5% 191,442 10.4% 1.7% Airport Operations 1,876,299 2,038,071 8.6% 2,073,262 Transit Operations In September 1984, Parking increased service in the Dubuque Street Ramp from 19-1/2 hours a day to 24 hours a day and now operates both ramps on Sundays. This increased operating costs in FY85. The FY85 estimate is very large compared to the other years also because it includes $220,000 in transfers out for improvements to both parking ramps. The FY86 budget increases because it includes the additional costs for the bonds which will be issued in FY85 to construct two addi- tional floors on the Dubuque Street Ramp. Pollution Control expenditures increased in FY85 as a result of budgeting for cleaning the digesters. FY86 continues maintenance at that level. In Water, FY84 costs were higher than usual due to increased costs for new or replaced water mains. This resulted from the new construction in town and a larger than usual number of main breaks. The City was reimbursed for 68% of the construction costs by contractors of subdivi- sions. { y Refuse expenditures reflect only inflationary increases, but no changes in service. I Landfill costs vary according to capital outlay and transfers. FY85 includes a transfer of iii $341,000 to the Capital Projects fund for the Landfill Leachate Control project (FY86-90 CIP). In FY86, there is $305,000 budgeted for contracted excavation at the Landfill site. — The Airport pays $10,000 each year for 60 Bonds sold in FY83 for T -Hangars. For FY85, a $10,000 transfer was made to Debt Service that should have been made in FY84. FY86 shows an additional -" $28,000 in the transfer to Debt Service for 60 bonds that will be issued for an airport hangar to _ be constructed in FY85-FY86. Transit added a new tripper service in FY85. Transfers to the Capital Projects fund for the new facility and for bus replacement skews the total expenditures. Without the transfers, FY85 expen- ditures increase 10% over FY84 ($1,914,356/1,737,008) while FY86 rises only 5.7% ($2,023,262/1,914,356) to maintain the tripper service added in FY85 and to upgrade bus mainte- nance in FY86. Bus maintenance must be upgraded to provide additional staffing and mechanic training due to the operation of the new Transit Maintenance Facility and the complexity of repair of the City's newer buses. 2. Reserve Funds J The revenue bond ordinances require that Parking, Pollution Control and Water set aside these special accounts: a) Bond and Interest Sinking Reserves - amounts sufficient to pay current bond and interest ma- turities. i b) Bond and Interest Reserves - balances to be maintained that are equal to the maximum amount ofLA principle and interest due on the bonds in any succeeding fiscal year. c) Depreciation, Extension and Improvement Reserve or Renewal and Improvement Reserves - $24,000 annually for Pollution Control, $36,000 annually for Water and $60,000 annually for Parking is transferred in from each respective operations fund for the purpose of funding capital im- provements. d) Operations Reserve - only water bonds are required to carry this reserve; it needs a balance I of $50,000. Bonds called early may be paid from this reserve. Landfill, Airport, and Transit have set up their own reserves for future capital expenditures. - Landfill's reserve is meant for relocation of the landfill or construction of a facility that may be deemed a necessary alternative to a landfill site. Airport reserves are intended for capital _ improvements to runways and facilities. Transit's buses will be replaced by using its reserve _ funds and Federal grants. ACTIVITY NGS CITY OF IOWA CITY FY96 OPERATING BUDGET CXPLGENERALSFUNDM RY FY94 ACTUAL ...... 1 NCY OPER 1 INSPECT RECREATION ADMIN CENTER GRAND TOTAL rvesESTIMATE I' 49'16 a BT ........ ...... 26{,OS ,j{ '41:109 418,04 118:04 00 I; i 0s` 14050 119:974 A}0i0S 10111;111 I' 49'16 a 1'605, 59 14 9i 1,11ru 405;6 1x07; 14j6/,y6 '.7 yy ;57D 1813 200:111 201,066 ww...ww..w 11,572,990 .... w..w. 12,792,993 ....ww.w.w 13,587,157 anommunnow mommu laox■ .oxII�AY4CR/ i CITY OF IOWA CITY ADMINISTRATIVE RECEIPTS SUMMARY Y FFY8AA6 ACTUAL ESTIMATE OPERATING EXPENDITURES: PERSONAL SERVICES COMMODITIES SERVICES AND CHARGES CAPITAL OUTLAY TRANSFERS TOTAL RECEIPTS: CITY OF IONA CITY FY86 OPERATING BUDGET RECEIPTSilND EXPEN CITY CTURES SUMMARY NOTE: SEE ADMINISTRATIVE RECEIPT SUMMARY FOR DETAILED RECEIPTS -- FY86 BUDGET ---------- FY84 ACTUAL FY83 ESTIMATE DEPT REQUEST ADMIN PROPOSAL FINAL BUDGET 32, 625 36,088 36,088 36,088 390 41, 788 390 412 211,110 400 227,294 350 245,709 246,709 249,306 --0 3100 6606 600 _____ --0 ____ 244,630 264,052 ----- 282,803 283,743 288,044 avaasoaaa vaaaa¢vvv saassrva. sv¢¢aam¢¢ ¢acmv_aaa FY86 FY84 FY83 FINAL ACTUAL ESTIMATE BUDGET NOTE: SEE ADMINISTRATIVE RECEIPT SUMMARY FOR DETAILED RECEIPTS CITY COUNCIL MAYOR TOTAL CITY OF IOWA CITY FY86 OPERATING BUDGET EYPENpITURES 11110 CI Y COUBNCI4 PERSONAL SERVICESi FTE BUDGET NONE . ...... FY05 FY66 8 1.00 1,00 34,578 7,210 . ........ ......... 7.00 7.00 <f1,700 TRANSFER T01 TOTAL INTRACITY CHARGEBACKSI VEHICLE OPERATIONS 30 YO RDC PROCESBIMGMBNT 0 ADMINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD 0 COD MAINTENANCE 0 TOTAL 30 �aeCep/RR CAPITAL OUTLAVi 3 I-DRANER FILE CABINETS 600 TOTAL 600 C :n LiiiiS NOTE: SEE ADMINISTRATIVE RECEIPT SUMMARY FOR DETAILED RECEIPTS CITY OF I014A CITY FY86 OPERATING BUDGET RECEIPTS 4WD SUMMARY 20XPENDITURES lItCITY CLERK EXPENDITURES: -- FYB6 BUDGET ---------- FY84 FY80 DEPT ADMIN FINAL ACTUAL ESTIMATE REQUEST PROPOSAL BUDGET PERSONAL SERVICES 67,345 74.666 1,850 1.413 81,192 1,342 81,192 1.342 81,192 1,342 COMMODITIES SERVICES AND CHARGES 40.809 22,294 43,249 42,804 42,804 CAPITAL OUTLAY 375 ----- 330 __-_1_665 ----------1663 TOTAL ----5 ---- _--_- 113,391 98,748 126.113 127,003 127.003 mmamxma�m mm�maaama aaaxmmaaa axamxmmmx axmas:oxa RECEIPTS: FY86 FY64 FY85 FINAL ACTUAL ESTIMATE BUDGET NOTE: SEE ADMINISTRATIVE RECEIPT SUMMARY FOR DETAILED RECEIPTS CITY OF IOWA CITY FY86 OPERATING BUDGET EXPENDITURES 11120 CITY CLERK PERSONAL SERVICES: TRANSFER TOS CAPITAL OUTLAY: TYPEWRITERIAL CHAIR TOTAL ==ec�saos • 1505 1,665 — ■csssssss , FTE BUDGET NONE 0 ... ...... ......... 0 TOTAL FY85 1FY86 03e15 YICLERKERK/TYPIST :so 1;00 11.25 777*:f **YPIAgT � MINUTES (PT) :Y5 05 EMPLOYEES 68 3, 0 INlRAd1lY CHARGEBACKSt URANCE 4r95 VEHICLE OPERATIONS iC ILITY INSUR SON VEHICLE RLPLACFIMENT 0 - TOTAL ..... ..... a'ssassslsas ......... MORD PROpCESSIN CODIMAINREN�NCOVERHEAD 8 s3==5 ssss TOTAL it CAPITAL OUTLAY: TYPEWRITERIAL CHAIR TOTAL ==ec�saos • 1505 1,665 — ■csssssss , - CITY OF IOWA CITY FY86 OPERATING BUDGET RECEIPTS EXPENDITURES SUMMARY I ' - - EXPENDITURES: I -� FY84 FY87 DEPT - FYAOMIN GET ---FINAL ACTUAL ESTIMATE REQUEST PROPOSAL BUDGET I - PERSONAL SERVICES 96,038 96,227 103,061 104,386 160.781 i C014MODITIES 4,674 3,400 51000 4,900 4,900 SERVICES AND CHARGES 62,740 73,370 63,420 64,620 17,620 CAPITAL OUTLAY 1 0 1_107 1,700 1,773 TOTAL 163,431 132,997 176,786 173,606 187,036 aaeaxam�a �s��x�a�a xomss-x�x at:aseama ammsamsmm i RECEIPTS: FY84 FY87 F NAL ACTUAL ESTIMATE BUDGET NOTE: SEE ADMINISTRATIVE RECEIPT SUM14ARY FOR DETAILED RECEIPTS i J I- I I I_i_1 CAPITAL OUTLAYS 1 TYPEWRITER ! {-DRAWER FILE CABINET TOTAL _ 11255 1,755 — osii=�=ii V) CITY OF IOWA CITY UI FY06 OPERATING BUDGET 1] EXPENDITURES 11130 CITY ATTORNEY PERSONAL SERVICESS TRANSFER TO: FTE BUDGET NONE 0 TOTAL 0 — FYBS FYB6 N SEC LEGAL 1,00 1.00 20733 29,8504 11.00 1.00 ,1 CITYIATTORNEYIII 17 226p ATTORNEY 1.00 CVITY EMPLOYEES 5 1/278 _ 9,156 INTRACITY CHARGEBACKSS {,979 TH INSURANCE 71{ 5 VEHICLE OPERATIONS CHICLE 29 /DISABILITY INSUR 11063 REPLACEMENT 0 0 TOTAL3,00 . ... ..... ......o3 {,00, 160,781 WORD ROCESBING ADMINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD 0 _ sc=== s=ass iissssa=s CBD MAINTENANCE 0 TOTAL 19 CAPITAL OUTLAYS 1 TYPEWRITER ! {-DRAWER FILE CABINET TOTAL _ 11255 1,755 — osii=�=ii CITY OF IOWA CITY FY86 OPERATING BUDGET RECEIPTS AND EXPENDITURES SUMMARY 11140 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT EXPENDITURES: --------- FY86 BUDGET ---------- FY84 ACTUAL FY87 ESTIMATE DEPT REQUEST ADMIN PROPOSAL FINAL BUDGET SERVICES AND CHARGES 2,927 40,000 0 0 40,000 40,000 O 40,000 0 TRANSFERS 33,867 --- -------- -------- TOTAL 36,792 e_acacmac 40,000 mcrosareca 40,000 mcacmcaca 40,000 Doman..= 40,000 mo�za_aza RECEIPTS: FY86 FY84 FY89 F114AL ACTUAL ESTIMATE BUDGET NOTE: SEE ADMINISTRATIVE RECEIPT SUMMARY FOR DETAILED RECEIPTS I i CITY OF IOWA CITY FY86 OPERATING BUDGET RECEIPTS AND EXPENDITURES SUMMARY 11210 CITY MANAGER EXPENDITURES: 0 -- FY86 BUDGET ---------- FY84 FY85 DEPT ADMIN FINAL ACTUAL ESTIMATE REQUEST PROPOSAL BUDGET PERSONAL SERVICES 124.836 130.490 132.026 138.800 138.800 COMMODITIES 2.006 1.683 2.333 2.335 2.335 -- SERVICES AND CHARGES 23.261 28.781 33.693 39.193 39.193 CAPITAL OUTLAY 0 --------- 50.000 --------- 170 30.170 30.170 - TOTAL 152,123 210.954 --------- 168.224 --------- 210.498 •-------- 210,498 aoo--rias oo---aa-a s�oa-r-aa �¢as¢¢a-- -aaac--a- RECEIPTS: - FY86 FY84 FY85 FINAL ACTUAL ESTIMATE BUDGET NOTE: BEE ADMINISTRATIVE RECEIPT SUMMARY FOR DETAILED RECEIPTS i _i 0 i CAPITAL OUTLAYI MICROCOMPUTERS 30,00 1 SECRETARIAL CHAIR _ 17 TOTAL 30,170 assssssss CITY OF LONA CITY FV06 OPERATING BUDGET EXPEND TURES 11210 CITY MANAGER PERSONAL SERVICESI TRANSFER TOi FTE BUDGET NONE 0 ... ..... TOTAL ......... 0 FYBS FY96 { _c'sss°ass CITY MANAGER 1,00 230,5'56 Y MANAGER 111.00 1;00 1.00 I: LOYEES ol {$5 7,078 3,709 INTRACITY CHARGEBACKS1 RETIREMENT 5, s0 5,65 VEHICLE OPERATIONS 1,7 0 970 TV INSUR 1, 21 VENlC E REPLACEMENT MORD TOTAL, ...•• "3.00 ••.•••.•. (PIROCESSING CBDINAINTCNANCE OVERHEAD 0 six:s sss'ssissssss TOTAL 2,666 csamcs_as' CAPITAL OUTLAYI MICROCOMPUTERS 30,00 1 SECRETARIAL CHAIR _ 17 TOTAL 30,170 assssssss CITY OF IOWA CITY FY86 OPERATING BUDGET RECEIPTS AND EXPENDITURES SUMMARY 11220 HUMAN RELATIONS EXPENDITURES: -•----- FY86 BUDGET ---------- FY84 FY85 DEPT ADMIN FINAL ACTUAL ESTIMATE REQUEST PROPOSAL BUDGET PERSONAL SERVICES 87, 220 89,537 3,465 95,530 2, 406 95, 330 2.606 93,330 2,606 COMMODITIES SERVICES AND CHARGES 2, 845 17,836 49,917 43,9770 43,9220 43,920 CAPITAL OUTLAY 0 O -------- _________ _________ TOTAL 107,901 138.939 141,913 142,058 142,058 OLCCCCii! 6!!!!.6l3 ilCi.i3SiS !i!!al.3i� �-.�39�J�S3 RECEIPTS: FY86 FY84 FY83 FINAL ACTUAL ESTIMATE BUDGET NOTE: SEE ADMINISTRATIVE RECEIPT SUMMARY FOR DETAILED RECEIPTS CITY OF IOWA CITY FY86 OPERATING BUDGET EXPENDITURES 11220 HUMAN RELATIONS PERSONAL SERVICES! TRANSFER TOi FTE BUDGET NONE 0 ...... ......... FY85 FY86 . 8 TOTAL __i..aaat PERSONNEL ASSISTANT1.00 1.00 yy0, 733 1. PERSONNEL GENERALIST 00 .00 23,022 HUMAN gqRELATIONS DpIRECTOR 1.00 �.00 36,042 TEMPOi INGIEYITV EMPLOY ES PERS HEALTH INSURANCE LIFE/DISABILITY INSUR TOTAL J I I� i I i r 1 5 7600 36655INTRACITY CHARGEBACKSI 8:651Q VEHHICL 0 ERIATIIONS 35 ••••• ••••• ••••••••• YEHIt � R�P 11CLMLN! E 3.00 3.00 95,530 NORD 5ROCESkING 8 Fpiii sppps,aasaappap ADMINISTRATIVE OVERHEADCBD 0 TOTAL. 358 aiaapppap CAPITAL OUTLAYI NONE 0 TOTAL 0 i iap�iaa■ CITY OF IOWA CITY FY86 OPERATING BUDGET 11230PBROADBANDPTELECOMMUNICATIONS EXPENDITURES: ` ---------- FY86 BUDGET ADMIN ----- -- i ACTUAL ESTIMATE REQUEST PROPOSAL BUDGET j PERSONAL SERVICES COMMODITIES 36,640 1,037 40,616 2,015 42,766 2,126 42,766 43,066 SERVICES AND CHARGES CAPITAL OUTLAY 10,235 8,195 7,263 2,076 10,741 2,076 10,741 TRANSFERS 260 14,1_92 0 21._986 290 2_3,_7_3_3 0 25,518 230 4 TOTAL 62,364 72,812 76,108 81,101 ____25, _91 81,621 ' RECEIPTS: xr somm�sa mmmmm�ama aysmxxa as ammmammaa v•xas-asa FY86 FY84 FY85 FINAL ACTUAL ESTIMATE BUDGET NOTE: SEE ADMINISTRATIVE RECEIPT SUMMARY FOR DETAILED RECEIPTS n IJ i i f I J -I (� i CITY OF IOWA CITY FY66 OPERATING BUDGET EXP NOITURES 11230 BROADBAND TELECON14UNICATIONS j PERSONAL SERVICESI TRANSFER TO: FTE BUDGET EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT MENT RES j, 500 W • •• REPAYMENT 01 12i56S i.� FY85 FY96 1 TOTAL '•"'•"' 25,519 iiCmiiiCi w BROADBAND TELApE 8P C_IALIST 1.00 1.00 26,904 �.f OR BTC TEMPa [PTI .50 •SO X260 ARYMEMPLOVEE8 LONGEVITY 4,644 I* X9754 HEALTH INSURANCE INTRACITY CHARGEBACKSi LIFE/DISABILITY INSUR ••••• ••••• 254 ••••••••• VEHICLE OPERATIONS 159 ;d TOTAL 1.50 1.50 43,066 VE HCLE REPLACEMENT 0 rw OR PROCcE6SING ADNINIOSTPATIYE OVERNEAD 0 3,673 CBD MAINTENANCE 0 r, TOTAL 3,032 CAPITAL OUTLAYt 1 4 -DRAWER FILE CABINET TOTAL _220 220 J CiCCiiii l: f I J -I (� i CITY OF IOWA CITY - FY86 OPERATING BUDGET RECEIPTS AND EXPENDITURES SUMMARY 11310 FINANCE ADMINISTRATION EXPENDITURES: _ -- FY86 BUDGEI - -- FY84 FY80 DEPT ADMIN FINAL ACTUAL ESTIMATE REQUEST PROPOSAL BUDGEI PERSONAL SERVICES 102,177 104,188 110,701 110,701 143,864 COMMODITIES 1,353 1,019 11100 1.100 1,100 SERVICES AND CHARGES 7,836 7,243 7,301 7,671 7,671 CAPITAL OUTLAY 339 O 0 0 TRANSFERS 696,794 836.766 0 990,036 1.033,784 ---- --------- TOTAL 808,699 949.216 119.102 1,114.008 1,188,424 mmcmamamv omamoavms aa�axmxmx mmamvaamx s-svxvvam .RECEIPTS: FY86 FY84 FY83 FINAL ACTUAL ESTIMATE BUDGET i .., NOTE: SEE ADMINISTRATIVE RECEIPT SUMMARY FOR DETAILED RECEIPTS tl CITY OF IOWA CITY i FYO� EXPENDIITURESDGET 11310 FINANCE ADMINISTRATION f f I 1 � PERSONAL SERVICES: TRANSFER T03 f FTC BUDGET JCCOC IOWA CITYIS SHARE 77.599 --- ---.-- TRANSIT OPERATING SUBSIDY 446.573 AIRPORT SUBSIDY 99,656 i FY86 FY66 I TRANSIT LEVY 345.354 MOTEL TAX - RECREATION FACTS 26.764 HOTEL TAX - PARKLAND ACO 17.843 ADMIN 65C*;,FINANCE 1.00 00 yy 5 7 MERCER DIAMOND 14 LIGHTS 42.000 SR PCO UNfANT FINANCE ADMI 1.00 1;00 4 �9�9 ----- - ASIT FINANCE DIRECTOR 1.00 2 707 TOTAL 1,035.789 FIN NCE DIREC OR 1,00 1.00 49:025 maxacrossa i TYCYMpEpORAREEY EMPZOYEES 400 iloo cAEVIlY 8,055 INTRA -CITY CHARGEBACKSs IPERS 5.308 VEHICLE OPERATIONS 226 HEALTH INSURANCE 7.425 VEHICLE REPLACEMENT 0 LIFE/DISABILITY INSUq ----- ----- ------948 WORD INIBTCESSSIEINNGOVERHEAD 8 TOTAL 3.00 4.00' 143.064 CBD MAINTENJINCE 0 -aLSL iia�i aaaaaa-aa--------- TOTAL 226 -' aaiaaaaii. CAPITAI, OUTLAYt NONE 0 TOTAL 0 sassassaa. i i i i CITY OF IOWA CITY FY136 OPERATING BUDGET REC11320 ACCOUNTINOI&UREPORTI14G EXPENDITURES: ---------- FY86 BUOGEI ---------- FY84 FY83 DEPT ADMIN FINAL ACTUAL ESTIMATE REQUEST PROPOSAL BUDGET PERSONAL SERVICES 189,516 236,706 232,950 252,950 252,950 COMMODITIES 7,535 9,070 12, 110 t2,110 12,110 SERVICES AND CHARGES 124,646 69,067 76,614 76,614 76,614 CAPITAL OUTLAY 5,271 51,200 56,670 80,300 80,300 TRANSFERS O 0 0 --------- 0 --------- 0 --------- TOTAL --------- 326,988 --------- 366,043 398,344 421,974 421,974 maavmamvm mvmsmvovm svvvmasvv avvvsvays xomamoams RECEIPTS: FY86 FY84 FY85 FINAL ACTUAL ESTIMATE BUDGET NOTE: SEE ADMINISTRATIVE RECEIPT SUMMARY FOR DETAILED RECEIPTS i CAPITAL OUTLAYt 3 COMPUTED TERMINALS 3,300 COMPUTER PGRADE 73,200 1 MICROFILM READER 3,800 TOTAL 60,300 ssssmFFaa CITY OF IOWA CITY F'Y86 OPERATING' BUDGET NY EXPENDITURES 11320 ACCOUNTING L REPORTING PERSONAL SERVICES( TRANSFER TOF 1``,69s75 FTE BUDGET NONE 0 ... ...... ......... TOTAL 0 FT65 FY86 $ mssaammaa HK ACCOUCRcTING 1.00 1,00 7,087 9031 1�o43 00 21;00 ,CCLERK•ACCCTOGUNTIN 11118,192 1 B7 ANT.A000UNTING 1`;00 ;00 SING ASSIST NT SPECIALIST 11.00111111,00,178 '00 1 00 2 986 INTRACITY CHARGEBACKSI CAPITAL OUTLAYt 3 COMPUTED TERMINALS 3,300 COMPUTER PGRADE 73,200 1 MICROFILM READER 3,800 TOTAL 60,300 ssssmFFaa (PT) ;50 ;50 NENT NY MORDCPE REEA6IBIIgHgLE 0 YNTANT-ACCOUNTING T 1``,69s75 CBDIMAIN7CNANCE VERNEAD 0 1�o43 INSURANCE 11118,192 ......... ISA816ITY INSUp TOTAL 0 TOTAL .... 9,50 ����� 9.50 ����19567 252,950 ampapmaaa' maF+F camps Fgm%mFcmF CAPITAL OUTLAYt 3 COMPUTED TERMINALS 3,300 COMPUTER PGRADE 73,200 1 MICROFILM READER 3,800 TOTAL 60,300 ssssmFFaa , I EXPENDITURES: PERSONAL SERVICES COMMODITIES SERVICESOAANNDCHARGES CAPITATRANSFERS TOTAL RECEIPTS: CITY OF IOWA CITY FY86 OPERATING BUDGET RECEIPTS AND EXPENDITURES SUMMARY 11330 CENTRAL PROCUREMENT & SERVICES -- FY86 BUDGET -- -- FY84 FY83 DEPT ADMIN FINAL ACTUAL ESTIMATE REQUEST PROPOSAL BUDGET 121, 064 124,4t3 131,820 1,490 131, 820 11 490 131,820 1,490 1, 044 07, 688 1,230 65,385 631 1 t 0 63, 033 63,035 4, 683 940 44,300 1, 3000 1,300 O O 0 184,981 191,993 240,723 197,645 197,645 aaaaaaama aaamaaaaa asaFY86 a �aaamaaas saacmmama FY84 FY80 FINAL ACTUAL ESTIMATE BUDGET NOTE: SEE ADMINISTRATIVE RECEIPT SUMMARY FOR DETAILED RECEIPTS i CITY OF IOWA CITY FYB EXPENDITUREbOGET 11330 CENTHAL PROCUREMENT G SERVICES PERSONAL SENVICESt TRANSFER TOt j 0 FTE BUDGET NONE ......... TOTAL 0 � � FYB5 fY86 { aacaassas I' SR CLERItc/TYP ST PURCHASING .00 11.00 17?660 DUOLICATIMG MICHINE OPERASING 00 1:00 11#090 BUYER AA TT 1.00 .00 1:IBV CLERK%TYPISifbMITCHBOARD (PT) 1.12 •12 111500 TEMPORARYVERTIME EMPLOYEES 210 INTRACITY CHARGEBACKS1 r LONGEVITY I�6 I VEHI L OPERATIONS 0 Or c E E [PENS 5510 VEHICLE REPLACEMENT 0 ` HEALTH INSURANCE 8�3B7 MORD STRA LVE 0 — LIFE/DISABILITY INSUR 779 ADMINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD 0 �.... .....'..�•.•••. CBD MAINTENANCE TOTAL5.12 5.12 131,{20 ' mouse sssss ssssstsa TOTAL 0 asc.aaaRa' I CAPITAL OUTLAYS -_- 1 LETTER OPENER _1,300 J TOTAL 1.300 aaF+iiaai CITY OF IOWA CITY FY86 OPERATING BUDGET RECEIPTS-ANDETRRYS SUMMARY EXPENDITURES EXPENDITURES: -- FY86 BUDGET FY84 FY83 DEPT ADMIN FINAL ACTUAL ESTIMATE REQUEST PROPOSAL BUDGET PERSONAL SERVICES 234.333 244,312 11630 261,889 1,860 261,889 2,299 261,889 2,299 COMMODITIES SERVICES AND CHARGES 2,102 11,823 13,760 13,163 13,163 13,163 0 CAPITAL OUTLAY 303 443 3940 TOTAL 248,761 260,167 279,308 279,333 279,333 -sss_aoa masm_amsa o-ss-aass ma_amasss sssaass ss RECEIPTS: FY86 FY84 FY83 FINAL ACTUAL ESTIMATE BUDGET NOTE: SEE ADMINISTRATIVE RECEIPT SUMMARY FOR DETAILED RECEIPTS 1 1 CITY OF IOWA CITY FY66 OPERATING BUDGET EJPENDITUpES 1140 TREASURY PERSONAL SERVICESI TRANSFER T07 FTE BUDGET NONE 0 TOTAL ...�....0 FY85 FY86 9 ..-taseass R - TREASURY 1,00 1,00 11.967 TYPIST'- TREASURY .00 3.00 5 ,664 T C ERK TREASURY 4,00 p.00 366 A ENKYTYPIBT TREASURY 1,80 fIS Y 7 T C RKZTREAS, TILITIE . 0 1.0096 S EA SERVICE REP 1,00 1,00 117.48 pTpANI 1.00 1.00 110380 INTRA -CITY CHARGEBACKSI ME EMPLOYEES 1.00 1.00 170 VEHICLE OPERATIONS 0 1. 60 VEHICLLE REPLACENENT G ITY y� SO WORD PROCESSING 1 ADMINISTRATIVE B ILIYE11111;14CDATEAE ISABTINSUR 1.663 .......... ......... TOTAL 0 TOTAL 11.00 11,00 461.889 •sassasss Campo aaaaR assoampas CAPITAL OUT6AYt NONE 0 TOTAL 0 paamaaaai EXPENDITURES: PERSONAL SERVICES COMMODITIES SERVICES AND CHARGES CAPITAL OUTLAY RECEIPTS: TOTAL CITY OF IOWA CITY FY86 OPERATING BUDGET RECEIPTS AND EXPENDITURES SUMMARY d, 11360 WORD PROCESSING NOTE: SEE ADMINISTRATIVE RECEIPT SUMMARY FOR DETAILED RECEIPTS ---------- FY66 BUDGET ---------- FY84 FYB3 DEPT ADMIN FINAL ACTUAL ESTIMATE REGUEST PROPOSAL BUDGET 87,714 89,693 97,177 97,177 97,177 2,393 3,660 2,633 2,633 2,633 25,478 22,313 23,037 23,037 23,037 704 0 --------- 8,800 8,600 0,800 --------- 116,291 113,670 --------- 131,649 --------- 131,649 --------- 131,649 cccccca:a aacaaccsa a.ccsaaea asasaac�c asccscosa FY86 FY84 FY83 FINAL ACTUAL ESTIMATE BUDGET NOTE: SEE ADMINISTRATIVE RECEIPT SUMMARY FOR DETAILED RECEIPTS 0 FY86TOPERATINC IUDGEt EXPENDITUUREE6 11360 WORD PROCESSING PERSONAL SERVICES$ FTE BUDGET NONE ...... FY65 FY66 $ WORD PROCESSING OPERATOR 3.00 3.00 5 Z WORD PROCESSING SUPERVISOR 1.00 1.00 $4:815 TIMPORARY EMPLOYEES OVVERTIME LONGEVITY FICA IPERS HE LTH INSURANCE LI E/DISABILITY INSUR TOTAL 7o50g 875 500 3�631 ..... ..... ......... 1.00 a.00 97x aasca csaac,sssss:asssae TRANSFER T03 TOTAL ca�csacsc INTRACITY CHARGEBACKS1 VEHICLE OPERATIONS 0 VEHICLE REPLACEMENT 0 WORD VRVpCESSING 0 ADMIN5 NATIVE OVERHEAD 0 CBD MAINTENANCE ........0 TOTAL 0 a=a0aaaa■ CAPITAL OUTLAY$ CENTRAL DICTATION SYSTEM 6,800 TOTAL B,B00 eacacasaR n CITY OF IOWA CITY FY86 OPERATING BUDGET RECEIPTS AND EXPENDITURES SUMMARY 11400 RISK MANAGEMENT EXPENDITURES: ---------- FY86 BUDu`EI ---------- FY84 FY85 DEPT ADMIN FINAL ACTUAL ESTIMATE REQUEST PROPOSAL BUDGET COMMODITIES 0 0 0 0 O SERVICES AND CHARGES 228,833 310,312 355,300 355,300 355,300 CAPITAL OUTLAY 0 0 --------- 0 --------- 0 --------- 0 -------- TOTAL --------- 228,835 310,312 355,300 355,300 355,300 masaaaaaa amasasmaa aamaaaaas aasaxexsm .asacsmas RECEIPTS: FY86 FY04 FYBS FINAL ACTUAL ESTIMATE BUDGET NOTE: SEE ADMINISTRATIVE RECEIPT SUMMARY FOR DETAILFD RECEIPTS ! - CITY OF LONA CITY _ FY86 OPERATING BUDGET RECEIPTS AND EXPENDITURES SUMMARY 11500 GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS EXPENDITURES: ' -- -- FY86 BUDGET---------- FY84 FY85 DEPT ADMIN FINAL i ACTUAL ESTIMATE REQUEST PROPOSAL BUDGET PERSONAL SERVICES 34,672 37,331 41,174 41,174 41,174 j COMMODITIES 8,749 9,325 10,672 10,672 10,672 SERVICES AND CHARGES 78,059 85,554 93,890 113,390 113,390 ' CAPITAL OUTLAY 1,668 51180 0 0 0 TRANSFERS 5,060 O 0 0 0 --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- TOTAL 128, 208 137,390 143,736 165,236 165,236 xsc�xeasa• xacaaacma aocccsxaa aaoonccma cccmcmmco �+ RECEIPTS: FY66 FY64 FYBS FINAL ACTUAL ESTIMATE BUDGET NOTE: SEE ADMINISTRATIVE RECEIPT SUMMARY FOR DETAILED RECEIPTS I i J � � 1 jjI -I I CITY OF IOWA CITY (n FY06 EXPENDITUREBDCET 11500 GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS PERSONAL SERVICESS TRANSFER TOt FTE BUDGET NONE .0 ••• •••••• TOTAL 0 FYtlS FYB6 f a ii � NTT W I-RECREATION L GVMT SLOGS 2.00 2.00 310703 Oy,yCRTINEY EMPLOYEES /'U LICIEVITY ;849 — !I'PERS 2�750N INTRACITY CHARGEBACKSt HEALTH INSURANCE 4 LIFE/DISABILITY INSUR .......... ......... VEHICLE OPERATIONS 0 _ TOTAL 2.00 2.00 41.174 VEH CLE REP16ACCNENT 0 -gcpc casa■ iRtniPOf■ WORD PROCESSING 0 CODIMAINTENANCOVERHEAD 0 TOTAL 4 I Oaii iaai• CAPITAL OUTLAYS NONE ..... D TOTAL 0 =aa.ocaas — J I CITY OF IONA CITY FY86 OPERATING BUDGET RECEIPTS 11600ECIVILIR EXPENDITURES EXPENDITURES: ---------- FY86 BUDGET ---------- _ - FY84 FYB3 ESTIMATE DEPT REQUEST ADMIN PROPOSAL FINAL BUDGET ACTUAL PERSONAL SERVICES 24,931 23,448 426 27,427 434 27,427 434 27,427 COMMODITIES CHARGES 303 2,9430 3,3302 4,1340 3,8966 3,890 SERVICES AND CAPITAL OUTLAY --------- --------- 29,206 --------- 32,013 --------- 31,737 -------- 31,737 J TOTAL 28,177 aaaaasaaa a�aaa-vaa aa.avaaaa. aaaasa... aaaaaasaa RECEIPTS: FY86 FY84 ACTUAL FY83 ESTIMATE FINAL BUDGET r NOTE: SEE ADMINISTRATIVE RECEIPT SUMMARY FOR DETAILED RECEIPTS Ll CITY OF-IONA gCgITY FY86 EXPEND TURESDGET !a 11600 CIVIL RIGHTS PERSONAL SERVICES: TRANSFER TO: FTE BUDGET NONE T0TAL O FYBS FY86 i aasseasas. CIVIL RIGHTS SPECIALIST 1.00 1.00 22,300 LONGEVITY 1:3356 IIERS 1r177 NggApTH INSURANCE _ LIFE/DISABILITY INSUR ..... ����� INTRA -CITY CHARGEBACKSI TOTAL 1.00 1.00 27,427 Y06 asova sats• sapasaaaa VEHICLE OPEEATIONS VEHCLE REP ACENENT 0 - WORD PROCESSING 0 ADMINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD 0 _ __---_� TOTAL 206ssaasaaa■ CAPITAL OUTLAYS NONE G TOTAL 0 sssscasPa' _ i CITY OF LONA CITY FY86 OPERATING BUDGET RECEIPTS AND EXPENDITURES SUI111ARY 12110 P.P.D. ADMINISTRATION EXPENDITURES: ---------- FY86 BUDGET ---------- FY84 FY85 DEPT ADMIN FINAL ACTUAL ESTIMATE REQUEST PROPOSAL BUDGET PERSONAL SERVICES 69,027 74,361 78,097 78,097 78,097 COMMODITIES 111113 1,435 1,630 1,630 t.630 SERVICES AND CHARGES 4,867 51888 7,006 6,204 6,204 CAPITAL OUTLAY O 0 --------- 9.068 --------- 1,500 --------- 1.500 -------- TOTAL --------- 75,012 81,684 95.801 87.431 87,431 mmisi.am. .smiaiaa mmamimeaa am.mmaamo mei.amsa= RECEIPTS: FY86 FY84 FY83 FINAL ACTUAL.' ESTIMATE BUDGET PROPERTY TAX 75,012 81,684 ------------------ 87,431 -- --------- ...mam=a iemmae-• i mmiim�mmm CITY OF IOWA CITY — FY86 EXPENDITURESDGE? 12110 P,P,D, ADNINISTRATION PERSONAL SERVICESS TRANSFER TO: FTE BUDGET NONE 0 ... ...... ......... TOTAL _ _ 0 FYBS FY66 ``•gg 11 ICS TECHNpppAN 1:55 1 00 ;55 11:103 pDICCNICTppOR ,60 ,60 26067 VIRK/NNPLDYEE6NINUTES (PT) .63 ,63 6:301 4,562 INTRA -CITY CHARGEBACKSS 3:519 H INSURANCE 4, 3 VEHICLE OPEEA IONS 86 DISABILITY INSUp 356 VEHICLE REP ADENENT 0 ..... ..... ......... WORD PROCESSING 0 TOTAL :im=c sssii'iacsmocsi CBDIMAINTENANCE OVERHEAD TOTAL _ 87 .�.G3G7CF CAPITAL OUTLAY) TYPEWRITER 1,500 TOTAL 1,500 I, *Admin. Sec. -PPD: **PPD Director: ***Sr. Clerk/Typist-PPD: 55% of HE is shown here; remainder is funded in JCCOG Admin., JCCOG _ Rural Planning and CDDG Metro Entitlement. 60% of HE is shown here; remainder is funded in JCCOG Admin. and CDBG _ Metro Entitlement. 43% of HE is shown here; remainder is funded in JCCOG Admin. EXPENDITURES: PERSONAL SERVICES COMMODITIES SERVICES AND CHARGES CAPITAL OUTLAY TOTAL RECEIPTS: CITY OF I014A CITY FVS6 OPERATING BUDGET RECEIPTS AND EXPENDITURES SUMMARY 12120 URBAN PLANNING 5, DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY TAX CHARGES FOR SERVICES BUILDILANEDUEVELOPMENT F MISCEL ---------- FY86 BU GEi ---FINAL FY84 FY85 ESTIMATE DEPT REQUEST PROPOSAL BUDGET ACTUAL 160,598 13.043 t6,200 1.693 151, 690 155. 187 t55,187 2, 244 155,187 2,244 134, 816 1, 679 2, 039 2, 244 77, 19, 440 19, 440 52,663 t6,872 440 ___ ___ -- 171,196 235,494 177,290 sooamsaoa 177,290 saaaaaasa 189,182 .... =anow aaaaas=sa m�aassaes FY86 FY84 FY85 ESTIMATE FINAL BUDGET ACTUAL 174. 480 154, 0980 160,598 13.043 t6,200 1.693 t6.2000 - --------- -- 169, 182 171,196 aasaaaaaa 177. ago aasaaaaaa aasaaaaaa I m., W4 TRANSFER TOS ° 0 TOTAL 0 ,ez=aisgR _ IPERS¢. 49 INTRA -CITY CHARGEBACKSI NNEAL7H INSURANCE •. 03 — 6IFE/DISABILITY INSUR 914 VEHICLE OPERATIONS 656 -- --- ...... VEHICLE REPLACEMENT 0 TOTAL 5.00 5.00 155.L87 WORD PROCRESSING O Risia isiis.iiiiiisii ADMINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD *Technical Assistant: **Associate Planner: CBD MAINTENANCE TOTAL 656 CAPITAL OUTLAYS 2 EXECUTIVE CHAIRS TOTAL ROitFRRRR �"� a 440 110 .- 50% of FTE is shown here; remainder funded in JCCOG Admin. and JCCOG Rural Planning. 4 Planners funded but only 25% of one FTE Planner is shown here; remainder funded in CDBG Metro Entitlement. CITY OF IOWA CITY FY86 EXPENDITURESDCET 12120 URBAN PLANNING i DEVELOPMENT PERSONAL SERVICES: FTE BUDGET NONE FY85 FY06 1 *TECHNICAL ASSISTANT PPD .50 .50 10.54 **AS¢OCIATE PLANNER 3.25. 3.25 844.YB29 SENOR PLANNER 1.00 1.00 28.201 ASSOCIATE PLANNER (PT) .25 .25 5.9975Y ICA 9. 96 m., W4 TRANSFER TOS ° 0 TOTAL 0 ,ez=aisgR _ IPERS¢. 49 INTRA -CITY CHARGEBACKSI NNEAL7H INSURANCE •. 03 — 6IFE/DISABILITY INSUR 914 VEHICLE OPERATIONS 656 -- --- ...... VEHICLE REPLACEMENT 0 TOTAL 5.00 5.00 155.L87 WORD PROCRESSING O Risia isiis.iiiiiisii ADMINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD *Technical Assistant: **Associate Planner: CBD MAINTENANCE TOTAL 656 CAPITAL OUTLAYS 2 EXECUTIVE CHAIRS TOTAL ROitFRRRR �"� a 440 110 .- 50% of FTE is shown here; remainder funded in JCCOG Admin. and JCCOG Rural Planning. 4 Planners funded but only 25% of one FTE Planner is shown here; remainder funded in CDBG Metro Entitlement. i EXPE14D I TURES: PERSONAL SERVICES COMMODITIES SERVICES AND CHARGES CAPITAL OUTLAY TRANSFERS TOTAL RECEIPTS: PROPERTY TAX LICENSES k PERMITS MISCELLANEOUS 0 CITY OF IOWA CITY FY86 OPERATING BUDGET RECEIPTS AND EXPENDITURES SUMMARY 12200 ENGINEERING - FYADMINDGET ---FINAL FY84 FY83 DEPT BUDGET 230,231 ACTUAL ESTIMATE REQUEST PROPOSAL BUDGET 207,114 306,981 318,370 318,370 318,370 3,427 4,810 4,803 4,703 4,703 19,333 20,479 24,422 19,042 19,042 2211 1,440 1,800 1,200 1,200 0 0 0 0 230,313 3337730 349,397 343,317 3437317 aa..mama. a. ... .=s. arise.... nansa.aan FY86 FY84 FY83 FINAL ACTUAL ESTIMATE BUDGET 230,231 332,660 342,317 1,0000 1,0000 84 --------- --------- 230,313 333,710 --------- 343,317 am....... ....=moss ss===�... CITY OF IOWA CITY FYB6 OPERATING BUDGET I EXEHDITURE6 4) . 12200 ENGINEERING PERSONAL SERVICES$ TRANSFER TOS — FTE BUDGET NONE 0 5,000 MOND PROCESSING TOTAL 0 FY85 FYB6 i s=: pcsapa 1.00 1.0 16,99• H OFFIC N�.INEERING TOR II 1.00 •08 1.00 .07 24,594 ,Z2gjg ........0 µ 8,992 "" X00 076H. zsoacsap■ , S9S A. b RVE 1:03 6 .00 .00 200 ,3b7 INTRACITY CHARGEBACKSS �69 1;00 31 e35 — •DO 1.00 37,755 VEHICLE OPERATIONS 7,420 EMPLOYEES 51000 VEHICLE RCPLACENENT 1,572 5,000 MOND PROCESSING 0 1.700 ADNINIETRATIVE OVERHEAD 0 12:293 117,603 CBD MAINTENANCE URANCE ILITY INSULA TOTAL ........0 µ 8,992 "" ���+�+••2:002 zsoacsap■ TOTAL 10.00 10.00 318,370 c=ia= =Zmaa apaicpapz �^ CAPITAL OUTLAYS — SIDEWALK OR DRIVEWAY REPAIR 1,200 TOTAL 1,200 cc:cocaca — i CITY OF IOIJA CITY FY86 OPERATING BUDGET SUMMARY 12300PTS PUBLIC WORKSANDDITUREADMINISTRATION EXPENDITURES: --------- FY86 BUOGEI ---------- FY83 FY84 ACTUAL FY83 ESTIMATE DEPT REQUEST ADMIN PROPOSAL FINAL BUDGEI PERSONAL SERVICES 37,244 36,636 73,167 393 73,167 393 73,167 393 C014MODITIES SERVICES AND CHARGES 268 21629 330 3,490 4,819 4,186 4,186 11300 CAPITAL OUTLAY 00 00 00 1,3000 TRANSFERS --------- --------- -------- TOTAL 60,141 -------- 60,476 78,379 79,246 79,246 asasza:zs zsxzaxxzo v: masaamx :aazxxaae s_maeasza RECEIPTS: FY86 FY84 FY83 FINAL ACTUAL ESTIMATE BUDGE) PROPERTY TAX ADMIN EXPENSE CHARGEBACK-- 24,047 36_094 22,377 -- 37_899 -------- 31,383 --------- 60,141 60,476 79,246 mmxmvaxza avevsaooa a-azxazaa CITY OF gqIOWA CITY FYB6 EXPENOITURESDCET 12300 PUBLIC WORKBS ADMINISTRATION PERSONAL SERVICES$ TRANSFER TOi FTE BUDGET NONE .... 0 TOTAL 0 -s.m°maaa iO ADMINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD CBD MAINTENANCE � WI TOT" _ 443 .coaaacat '" CAPITAL OUTLAYi — TYPEMRITER 1,500 TOTAL 1,500 CP�PF :aaa FYBS FYB6 ADppIN SEC PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 9,923 •2x000 PUBLI� NORMS TEMPORARY ENPLOYEEb LONGEVITY 4,36S ``ICA' IPERbt483 INlRAoCIlY CHARGEBACKSI HEALTH INSURANCE LIFE/DISABILITY INSUR ����� ����� ��....... VEHICLE OPERATIONS 440 — TOTAL 2.U0 --- 2.00 Macao 73.167 ariasMaas VEHICLE REPLACtMENi WORD PROCESSING 0 0 iO ADMINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD CBD MAINTENANCE � WI TOT" _ 443 .coaaacat '" CAPITAL OUTLAYi — TYPEMRITER 1,500 TOTAL 1,500 CP�PF :aaa i - CITY OF IOWA CITY FY86 OPERATING BUDGET i RECEIPTS AND I t I EXPENDITURES: ---------- FY86 BUDGET ---------- FY84 FY85 DEPT ADMIN FI14AL ACTUAL ESTIMATE REQUEST PROPOSAL BUDGET 'V PERSONAL SERVICES 35,019 34,552 36,428 36,428 36,428 COMMODITIES 4, 043 3, B00 4,020 4,020 4,020 SERVICES AND CHARGES 81911 16,474 34,145 17,091 17,091 CAPITAL OUTLAY 200 11000 3,400 3,400 3,400 jj TRANSFERS___ _____0 0 0 0 ------- 0 j TOTAL 48,173 55,826 77,993 60,939 60,939 amocacaaa mmccamcme smamsmacm mmmmmmamc czazamama IJ �t w RECEIPTS: FY86 ~ FY84 FY85 FINAL ' ACTUAL ESTIMATE BUDGET - PROPERTY TAX 46,072 53,108 58,321 LICENSES & PERMITS 1,310 1,810 1,Bt0 MISCELLANEOUS 791 908 808 48,173 55,826 60,939 �jI mmacmcoam emanamsmo mmcacaoas J I j J CITY OF IOWA CITY FY86 EXPENDITURESOGET 12100 C.B,D, MAINTENANCE PERSONAL SERVICES: FTE BUDGET NONE FYBS FYB6 i NW.III CBD 1.00 1,00 Y0,327 0 EAEY EMPLOYEES 11 LONGEVITY FICA IPERS HEALTH INSURANCE LIFE/DISABILITY INSUR TOTAL I 0,100 50 05 2tIca TRANSFER TOS 0 TOTAL 0 1 162 INTRACITY CHARGEBACKS: ..... .............. VEHICLE OPERATIONS 0 1.00 100 36,128 VEHICLE REPLACEMENT 0 among ias,is ■ solium MORD PROCESSIMG 0 ADMINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD 13,133 TOTAL 13.133. ti CAPITAL OUTLAYS TREES'SHOU88AINERS TOTAL Ongigiiig. 2,100 1,000 3.100 '— �S:.CFiai:P CITY OF IOWA CITY FY86 OPERATING BUDGET RECEIPTS AND EXPENDITURES SUMMARY 12500 ENERGY CONSERVATION EXPENDITURES: ---------- FY86 BUDGET ---------- FY85 FY84 FY83 DEPT ADMIN FINAL PROPERTY TAX ACTUAL ESTIMATE REQUEST PROPOSAL BUDGET PERSONAL SERVICES 10,987 11,216 13,297 13,297 13,297 C0MMODITIES SERVICES AND CHARGES 291 335 -------- 300 --------- ----1_598 250 ----1_598 250 ---1_598 TOTAL ----1,309 12,587 12,613 15,195 15,145 15,145 ascmcaamm nmcxsscma macnxvoan amomcmvxc aacmcccns RECEIPTS: FY66 FY84 FY85 FINAL ACTUAL ESTIMATE BUDGET PROPERTY TAX 12,563 12,613 15,145 MISCELLANEOUS- 24 0 0 12,587 12,613 15,145 acccaaxce -xcs-scav vav-caomv i CITY 0 IOW AO CIITp I� FY86 OPE ENDITGRESDGET 12500 ENERGY CONSERVATION PERSONAL SERVICESi TRANSFER TOi - I 0 I FTE BUDGET NONE ......... i.. TOTAL 0 - FY65 FV96 8 =az=aiia: OVERTIMCOORDINATOR (PT) ,50 .50 10, ?5326 FICA 112 IPERS 946 HEALTH INSURANCE LIFE/DI6ABI41TY INSUR �.���.... INTRA-CI7Y CHARGEBACKSt TOTAL ,50 .50 13,297 176 R=:=c ciiii c=:IIc:IIas VEHICLE OPERATIONS - VEHICLE REPLACOMENT 0 MORD PROCESSIN 0 COD MAINTENANCOVERHEAD -• TOTAL 178 IIiiIIRRiii CAPITAL OUTLAYS - NONE 0 TOTAL 0 zzIIzzaaRR I - i 1 1 EXPENDITURES: PERSONAL SERVICES COMMODITIES CAPITALSOUTLAYNARGEB TOTAL RECEIPTS: PROPERTY TAX MISCELLANEOUS CITY OF 1014A CITY FY86 OPERATING BUDGET REC13110 POLICEPADMINISTRRATIONARY ---------- FY86 BUDGET ---------- FY84 FY85 DEPT ADMIN FINAL ACTUAL ESTIMATE REGUEST PROPOSAL BUDGE[ 103,899 106,024 114,100 114,100 114, 100 868 850 915 755 755 27,211 2t.945 22,183 19, 860 19,880 0 850 ----1_500 ---1,500 ------ -0 131,978 -- 128,819 ----- 138,050 136,215 136,215 ....=a==. sacs..=.= amcxasaax aaa.... == =m=amma.. FY66 FY84' FY85 FINAL ACTUAL ESTIMATE BUDGET 131,803 124,402 •132,098 4 175 4 7 -----117 131,978 ----41 128,819 136,215 cmoa=.max .acocaeac a-occ-cc. CITY OF IOWA CITY i FY66 OPERATING BUDGET EKPENDITURE6 13110 POLICE ADMINISTRATION i l PERSONAL SERVICES# TRANSFER TO# FTE BUDGET NONE 0 TOTAL 0 FY85 FYB6 4 =c=zzatz0 A NIN SEC POLICE 1.00 1.00 4330,733 POLPuTf ICE CHIEF CHIEF 1;00 1;00 48,TY 49y I FICAMRS 7 19 H INSURANCE TRACITY CHARGEBACKS# LIFE/DISABILITY INSUpw 0 .... ����� ������816 VEHICLE OPEpATjONS 0 TOTAL 3.00 3.00 114,100 VEHICLE REPLACeMERRT casae sscss ssssassss WORD PROCESSING 0 ADNINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD 0 CBD MAINTENANCE 0 ._-.- TOTAL 0 =z==sc=sz CAPITAL OUTLAYS 1 TYPEWRITER TOTAL 1,500 1,500 ==tCitattR. EXPENDITURES: PERSONAL SERVICES COMMODITIES SERVICES AND CHARGES CAPITAL OUTLAY TOTAL RECEIPTS: CITY OF IOWA CITY FY86 OPERATING BUDGET RECEIPTS ANDI3 EXP120 ENDITURES SUMMARY PATROL PROPERTY TAX CHARGES FOR SERVICES MOTEL TAX SALE OF PARTS M DERALAREVENUE SHARING FY85 -- DEPT FY86 BUDGET ADMIN ------ --- FINAL FY84 ACTUAL ESTIMATE REQUEST PROPOSAL BUDGET 1,206,411 1,273,667 1, 310, 764 108, 190 t,306,764 83,554 1,306,764 83,554 85,160 49, 714 90,002 49, 495 38,930 49,08t 83_000 49,08t 83_000 82,327 152,690 107,075 avvcaaama - 1,423,632 1, 565,834 1,584,959 1,522,399 omaamavna 1,322,399 amaaxnaaa aoxaxnamv maomxceaa xecmexa as FY86 FY84 ACTUAL FY85 ESTIMATE FINAL BUDGET 1.366 q09 1,344,843 1,425,733 49,562 69,390 14 89,100 4, 270 100 0 735 143, 35 1,000 11000 1,423,632 1,565,854 1,322,399 aaovmmvaa amaeacvna avvcaaama FY06TGPgDgRATING BCBUDGET EXPENDITURE6 13120 PATROL PERSONAL SERVICES: FTE BUDGET FY85 FY86 POLICE OFFICER 38,00 38.00 9391108 POLICE SERGEANT 6.00 6.00 166,143 POLICE CAPTAIN 2.00 2.00 66,730 OVERTIME 16,000 LONGEVITY 1pp HEALTH INSURANCE 75i170 LIFE/DISABILITY INSUR 4.058 TOTAL ..... 46.00 .............. 46.00 1.306,764 =case Maass saasscaMs TRANSFER TOs NONE 0 TOTAL 0 — caaasa=ss INTRACITY CHARGEBACMSt VEHICLE OPERATIONS 63.958 VEH CLE REPLACEMENT 0 - ANAOpRpD PROCESEING 0 CBDIMAINTENANCOVERHEAD 00 _ TOTALarm 63,958 CAPITAL OUTLAYS 7 PATROL CARS 7T, 500 1 4 -WHEEL DRIVE VEHICLE ,500 TOTAL 83,000 — =caMssss■ ■ i7. EXPENDITURES: PERSONAL SERVICES COMMODITIES SERVICES AND CHARGES CAPITAL OUTLAY TOTAL RECEIPTS: FVSCITY OF IONA CITY OPERATING BUDGET REC13130 CRIMINALNINVESTIGATIONRY PROPERTY TAX CHARGES FOR SERVICES MISCELLANEOUS -- FY86 BUDGET ---------- FY84 FY83 DEPT ADMIN FINAL ACTUAL ESTIMATE REQUEST PROPOSAL BUDGE) 133,411 144,813 187,704 2,940 187,704 2,685 187,704 2,685 11699 3,903 1, 825 3#830 5,733 51583 51585 O --- 9_000 91000 139,013 ----1_457 173,943 ---14_000 210,379 204,974 204,974 -mvcccama aasccco¢o mcsca¢ve¢ cc-saccc¢ ssc-as-cv FY86 FY84 ' FY85 FINAL ACTUAL ESTIMATE BUDGET 138.796 153,369 204,474 10_0 ------_ 0 _0 139, 013 153,943 204,974 ama ca¢cc� �ca�acaca mcscacac� CITY OF IOWA CITY FY86 OPERATING BUDGET 13130 CHININALIINVESTIGATION PERSONAL SERVICES! FTE BUDGET NONE FYBS FY86 i POLICE SERGEANT 7;00 7:00 16385{ OVERTIME • ;000 HEALTH INSURANCE LIFE/DISABILITY INSUR 1 8490 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE �1 TRANSFER TO: 0 TOTAL 0 — =.s==scss 3,60 INTRACITY CHARGEBACKSI* TOTAL .0 ... ... ......... 6.00 6.00 187,704 VEHICLE OP RATIONS p a.sos sss�s ssssssssa VEHICLE BEELA 0 WORD PROCESBINNNENT ADMINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD 0 CBD MAINTENANCE 0 0 TOTAL 0 CAPITAL OUTLAYS 1 UNMARKED CAR TOTAL rxxnmmnxn. �* 9,000 ri 9,000 :CaPcecCs — M� ' EXPENDITURES: PERSONAL SERVICES C014MODITIES SERVICES AND CHARGES CAPITAL OUTLAY TOTAL RECEIPTS: CITY OF IOWA CITY FY86 OPERATING BUDGET RECEIPTS AND EXPENDITURES SUMMARY 13140 RECORDS k IDENTIFICATION PROPERTY TAX CHARGES FOR SERVICES FEDERAL REVENUE SHPA ING MISCELLANEOUS -- FY86 BUDGET ---------- FY84 FY87 DEPT ADMIN FINAL ACTUAL ESTIMATE REQUEST PROPOSAL BUDGET 176.034 187,882 200,836 200,836 200,836 1,820 1, 990 1,973 10975 1,973 11.790 13,822 14,678 14.678 14,678 093 13,000 8,500 O 0 190,737 218,694 220,989 217,489 217,489 acxcsaasc acacsccaa x-scacacs sacoscacs ccccxo=os FY86 FY64 FY83 FINAL ACTUAL ESTIMATE BUDGET 187.880 201,900 217,326 2.700 2,163 10 S, 000 172 -----100 ------- 0 190.737 - 218,694 217,489 mscccccs ocsccacxc c-==rn occ CIITY OF IOWA CITY FYdb �1 — Y� EXPENDITING URE6DGET 13140 RECORDS i IDENTIFICATION PERSONAL SERVICES: TRANSFER TOS FTE BUDGET NONE 0 TOTAL 0 FY85 FT66 1 ==a°°asses TYPIST POLICE RECORDS 1,00 1000 17,535 — DESK CLERK 2,00 2,00 yy6,{0{ RKp/TYPIBTogrOLICE RECORD 1,00 1,00 6;50 1Y,7BI 7777779�166 — {;50 TOPIS�TCHEOLICE RECORDS((PT1 (PT 0 B;`8 IYIYSK CLERK ,50 INTRA -CITY CHARGEBACKSI 19,774 9, 39 10,900 VEHICLE OP R ONB P 6DE VE0EEHICLE RLLEE LI NCNT 0 0 — INSURANCE 1�251 ISABILITY INSUR 1pNINISTRATIBIINEEGOVERHEAD 0 _. 0 TOTAL 9.00 9.00' 200,836 CBD MAINTENANCE FFFFs xx;2w {NNFNiiNF .00.... w TOTAL 0 mumalMang CAPITAL OUTLAYS NONE 0 _ TOTAL 0 --XX=FSN■ '- z EXPENDITURES: PERSONAL SERVICES COMMODITIES SERVICES AND CHARGES TOTAL RECEIPTS: PROPERTY TAX CITY OF IOWA CITY FY86 OPERAT1140 BUDGET RECEIPTS AND EXPENDITURES SUMMARY 13150 SCHOOL SAFETY & EMERGENCY OPER -- FY86 BUDGET -- -- FY84 FYSS DEPT ADMIN FI14AL ACTUAL ESTIMATE REQUEST PROPOSAL BUDGET 23,207 26.978 30,628 29.123 29.123 273 300 1,000 370 370 1,488 4, 000 4,000 1,620 1,620 24,948 31,278 35,628 31,093 31,093 sx¢aax¢/a av¢vm/a/m /nxx¢xaa/ a/aasv/.x a xxaem/a FY86 FY84 ' FY83 FINAL ACTUAL ESTIMATE BUDGEt -- 24,948 -_ 31*238 31,093 24,945 31,258 31,093 v/ / v / a CITY OF IOWA, ONA CIT Y FY86 EXPEEIDITURESDGET 13150 SCHOOL SAF TYY L EMERGENCY OPER PERSONAL SERVICES: FTE BUDGET NONE F.Y85 FY86 6 TEMPORARY EMPLOYEES FICA IPERS TOTAL 76.331 1 927 ...2222. ...29.12. .00 .00 79.123 iiia. 9iiii fiiiiiCii W W TRANSFER TO: 0 TOTAL 0 zozzziass IMTRAICITY CHARGEBACKSI VEHICLE OPERATIONS 0 VEHICLE REPLACEMENT 0 BOD PROCESSING 0 ADMINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD 0 CBD MAINTENNCE ...9919 707AL- ifi z �' CAPITAL OUTLAY: NONE TOTAL z.zzs W 0 _ 0 zziaszis■ CITY OF IOWA CITY FY86 OPERATING BUDGET RECEIPTS AND1EXPENDITURES SUMMARY EXPENDITURES: ---------- FY86 BUDGET ADMIN ---------- FINAL FY83 ESTIMATE FYS4 ACTUAL FY85 ESTIMATE DEPT REQUEST PROPOSAL BUDGET PERSONAL SERVICES 1,264,3138 1,292,227 27,638 1, 368, 474 31,728 1,363,434 30,099 1,382,343 30,099 COMMODITIES SERVICES AND CHARGEE 29,319 13,587 47,d 27,17 000 26,300 42,177 27,000 CAPITAL OUTLAY O TRANSFERS 1,224 ,224 1,380,694 --------0 1,369,902 --------- 1,476.804 --------- 1,461.930 -------- 1,481,621 TOTAL ioemamimi imemoiaie i��saiais iiiiimaia s-semiiim RECEIPTS: FY86 FY84 ACTUAL FY83 ESTIMATE FINAL BUDGET PROPERTY TAX 1,059,963 320,179 1,016,289 353,31030 1,107,109 374,510 UWIVERSITY FIRE CONTRACT MISCELLANEOUS _________ 1,380,694 1,369,902 1,481,621 i FYB6TYppPERAAlING CppUDGET 6XPEMDITURC6 13200 FIRE TRANSFER TO$ PERSONAL SERVICES: 0 FTE BUDGET NONE .......++ •••••• TOTA0 L xGa aGiRRi rye FY66 6 37.00 37400 0339/896 ;TCR 3:00 3.00 161:767 — UTEMANT 4 ITAIN 35113e2 RATIVE CLERK/TYPIST 3'00 1, iSHApp 3:00 100 1 Or017 INTRACITY CHARGEBACKS1 lEFCHIEF 1.00 1.00 S3:0000 TTgg 11,2066 f}'g� MORDCPR CE831NGNCN! 0 fY 0 93162 ADMINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD 0 INSURANCE 31061 CBD MAINTENANCE ++. SABILITY IINSUR 21500 ALLOWANCE 25:200TOTAL TOTAL 11.,201. PAYMENT N PAYMENT +.+ .+++++ accac50.00 51.00 1,302,345 ix.aa CxaaG GGaiGai�a CAPITAL OUTLAY: — 1 CHAIN HOIST IN NOSE TOMER 11000 Soo REPLACE ALL XTEN510N CORDS qqr AIR COMPRESSOR FOR MSA TANK 10:750 — 5001 OF 1.5• HOSE 750 CARPET IN NEST+BIDE 8TN A 7 KITCHEN FURNIlUpE IN STN' 5009r+00 CH EFTS CAR _ 1 ELECTRONIC ARSON DETECTOR 1,200 2001 OF HOSE 4 HI_RISE HARNE88 PACKS 2;00;;; ++ — TOTAL acscsaoci. I i CITY OF IOWA CITY FY86 OPERATING BUDGET RECEIPTS13A3ND EX ANIMALICONTROLUMMARY EXPENDITURES: ---------- FY86 BUDGET ADMIN ---------- FINAL FY84 ACTUAL FY83 ESTIMATE DEPT REQUEST PROPOSAL BUDGET PERSONAL SERVICES 90,190 94.227 6, 213 99'758 6. 419 99,738, 443 93.443 COMIIODTTiES 4. 729 8 it, 8610 12,8;10 1,107 12,1660 SERVICES AND CHARGES 61'7) --------- --------- —'—'—''-- CAPITAL OUTLAY ------ 104.301 --------- 112.301 --------- 119.978 _--12=160 117,367 117,367 v-anasasa TOTAL scszvasao scazsavns saaaaosca scacsca=- RECEIPTS: FY86 FY84 AL BUDGET ACTUAL ESTIMATE PROPERTY TAX 82,107 13,727 87,369 14,874 92,737 14,874 ANIMAL LICENSES CHARGES FOR SERVICES 623 1, 072 1,072 7,199 ANIMAL IMPOUNDING h BOAR Zo04B 1,107 1,707 MISCELLANEOUS --------- --------- -- ---- 104,301 112,301 117,367 caaaoaaae aavzaanoa aaasvvaaa eccFc seeaa•�ssae�oaa MORD PROCESSING 0 ADMINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD 0 CBD MAINTENANCE 0 TOTAL 1,140 CAPITAL OUTLAYi NONE 0 TOTAL - - 0 CA AAAFAAi - CITY OF IOWA CITY FY86 OPERATING BUDGET Vl y 13300 ANIMAL CONTROL PERSONAL SERVICES: TRANSFER TO: FI'E BUDGET NONE 0 _ TOTAL FYBS FY06 4 F.Aaasss TT p 1 N SUPERVISOR 58 250 COD 1;00 4 OYENl1MEONTROL 25:500 NSEVITY HEEpS 75 8 5,g5 HEA Th INSURANCE 3So INTRAoCITY CHARGEBACKS: LIFE/DISABILITY INSUR TOTAL �����=55 1.00 4.00 99,758 VEHIC gg OPERATIONS 1,14 VENICLE REPLACEMENT S eccFc seeaa•�ssae�oaa MORD PROCESSING 0 ADMINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD 0 CBD MAINTENANCE 0 TOTAL 1,140 CAPITAL OUTLAYi NONE 0 TOTAL - - 0 CA AAAFAAi - CITY OF IOWA CITY FY86 OPERATING BUDGET RECEIPTS AND EXPENDITURES SUMMARY 13410 H.I.S. ADMINISTRATION EXPENDITURES: RECEIPTS: FY86 -- FY86 BUDGEI - -- ACTUAL FY84 FY85 DEPT ADMIN FINAL CHARGES FOR SERVICES O ACTUAL ESTIMATE REQUEST PROPOSAL BUDGET PERSONAL SERVICES 47,855 59,759 68,125 66,723 66,723 COMMODITIES 151 480 680 680 680 SERVICES AND CHARGES 6,279 7,303 9,918 8,360 8,560 CAPITAL OUTLAY 0 0 --------- 220 220 220 TOTAL --------- 54,285 67,542 --------- 78,943 --------- 76,183 --------- 76,185 vmasemaaa acaasaaaa a�vvasaaa aaaaacaas arvvacave RECEIPTS: FY86 FY84 FY65 FINAL ACTUAL ESTIMATE BUDGET PROPERTY TAX 33,790 38,622 66,824 CHARGES FOR SERVICES O 8,820 9,261 MISCELLANEOUS 495 t0O tOO 54,285 67,542 76,185 vaam9vvca acavasasa avaasaaas CAPITAL OUTLAYi 1 EXECUTIVE CHAIR TOTAL _a_ssssas. 220 =am 220 a=CaRit. OF IOWA FY86TEXPENDITURESDGET 13410 H,I,S, ADMINISTRATION PERSONAL SERVICESi TRANSFER TDI FTE BUDGET NONE 0 •; ••• •••••• TOTAL — FY95 FYV6 6 =s=s:ssss C0 E ENFORCEMENT ASST, N I S DIRECTOR 1,00 1,00 10,617 1.00 1,00 1:0p05 TANAOAARY EMPLOYEES aONGEVITY 4p,1`08 _ pp TH�ALTH INSURANCE 1:161) X419 INTRAwCITY CHARGEBACKSI LIFE/DISABILITY TNBUR ..... ..... VEHICLE ONERATIONS 200 TOTAL 2.00 2.00 66,725 YCHICLE R PLACEMENT M RD PROCESSING 0 — =s=ss sass sssasasss. ADMINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD 0 W TOTAL 200 CAPITAL OUTLAYi 1 EXECUTIVE CHAIR TOTAL _a_ssssas. 220 =am 220 a=CaRit. A RECEIPTS: CITY OF 1014A CITY FY86 FY84 FYS6 OPERATING BUDGET FINAL ACTUAL ESTIMATE RECEIPTS AND PROPERTY TAX BUILDING PERMITS & INSPE -73,682 18t,462 5,503 123,983 4,934 123,983 CHARGES FOR SERVICES PLAN CHECKING FEE 2,368 36,290 300 27177 EXPENDITURES: MISCELLANEOUS __________ FY86 BUDGET ---------- FY84 FY85 DEPT ADMIN FINAL aaaaa�aaa ACTUAL ESTIMATE REQUEST PROPOSAL BUDGET PERSONAL SERVICES 134,648 143,963 142,023 1,564 140,625 1,639 140,629 11639 COMMODITIES SERVICES AND CHARGES 4,994 1,350 25,665 13,329 15,772 14,862 14,862 445 CAPITAL OUTLAY O 520 440 TRANSFERS --------0 --------0 --------0 --------- TOTAL 165,307 155,642 159,881 157,571 157,571 maamaaamm mmammasmm mmmmmammm mmmmmmama aaaaammam RECEIPTS: FY86 FY84 FY85 FINAL ACTUAL ESTIMATE BUDGET PROPERTY TAX BUILDING PERMITS & INSPE -73,682 18t,462 5,503 123,983 4,934 123,983 CHARGES FOR SERVICES PLAN CHECKING FEE 2,368 36,290 300 27177 300 27 379 MISCELLANEOUS --------- --------- 165,307 158,642 157,571 aaaaa�aaa ansaamana anaaxaams seams sacs• sasssessa MORD PROCESSING 0 ADMINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD 0 CBD MAINTENANCE 0 TOTAL 7.547 CAPITAL OUT6AY1 - 1 EXECUTIVE CHAIR 220 1 35 -MR CAMERA 225 TOTAL 445 — LFZAC�AA• u Ll CIT0Yy OF IOWA CITY E'YB6 EXPENDITUREBDCET 13420 BUILDING INSPECTION PERSONAL SERVICESI TRANSFER TO: FTE BUDGET NONE 0 ... ...... ......... TOTAL 0 FY85 FY86 6 scsesss=• BUILDING INSPECTOR 4.00 4.00 67,032 — SR BUILDING INSPECTOR IND 1.00 210151 TEMPORARY EMPLOYEESX075 FCA a' 8. 7S 6 14 HEALTH INSURANCE 937s INTRACITY CHARGEBACKS1 LIFE/DISABILITY INSUR 901 ...�. ............... VEHICLE 0 ERATIONB 7r54H TOTAL 5.OU 5.00 140,625 VEHCLE REPLACEMENT u - seams sacs• sasssessa MORD PROCESSING 0 ADMINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD 0 CBD MAINTENANCE 0 TOTAL 7.547 CAPITAL OUT6AY1 - 1 EXECUTIVE CHAIR 220 1 35 -MR CAMERA 225 TOTAL 445 — LFZAC�AA• 14 EXPENDITURES: PERSONAL CAPITALSOUTLAYCHARGES i-fq]Ll! RECEIPTS: PROPERTY TAX RENTAL PERMITS MISCELLANEOUS CITY OF IOWA CITY FY86 OPERATING BUDGET RECEIPTS AND EXPENDITURES SUMMARY 13430 FIRE PREVENT 4 SAFETY INSPECT -- FY86 BUDGET -- -- FY84 FY85 DEPT ADMIN FINAL ACTUAL ESTIMATE REQUEST PROPOSAL BUDGET 87,621 98,889 104,538 104.338 104,938 953 1,077 1,131 1,131 1,131 10,628 10,088 12,431 12,366 12,366 564 340 320 ----1_500 --------- --------- 99,766 99,766 --------- 111,194 --------- 118,423 it9,535 119,535 aaaaaaaaa aaaama=as auaazaaaa aaaaaaaaa aaaaaoaaa FY86 FY84 FYB5 FINAL ACTUAL ESTIMATE BUDGET 39,871 61,453 69,168 59,895 35,121 35,121 0 14,520 15,246 0 100 0 99,766 111.194 119,533 aaaaaaaaa aaaas-aza aaaoa-aaa i L.1 CITY OF IOWA EM FY86 OPERATING BUDGET '^ W EXPENDITURES vl 13430 FIRE PREVENT 6 SAFETY INSPECT PERSONAL SERVICES: TRANSFER T0: FTE BUDGET NONE 0 ... ...... ....... TOTAL 0 rye FV86 6 zs=:summa CLERK/TYPIST - HIS 1,00 1.00 HOUSING INSPECTOR 3,00 3.000,914 16,30p LONGEVITY 194 6 1PERS HEALTH INSURANCE 1:646 a, 126 LIFE/DISABILITY INSUR 665 INTRAwCITY CHARGEBACK6: TOTAL 4,00 muss= 4.00 =sa=s 104,536 VEHICLE OPEEATIONS 6,941 ssasss=sm VEHCLE SEP ACENENT 0 WORD QROCES6ING 0 ADMIN STRATIVE OVERHEAD 0 CBD MAINTENANCE 0 - TOTAL 6,971 ===mammos. 4! CAPITAL OUTLAY: TYPEWRITER 1,500 TOTAL 1,500 cmzmsmoso. -- CITY OF IOWA CITY FY86 OPERATING BUDGET RECEIPTS AND EXPENDITURES SUMMARY 14100 TRAFFIC ENGINEERING EXPENDITURES: RECEIPTS: -- FY86 BUDGET -- -- FY84 FY80 DEPT ADMIN FINAL ACTUAL ESTIMATE REQUEST PROPOSAL BUDGET PERSONAL SERVICES 200,825 209,183 219,316 219,316 219,316 COMMODITIES 34,257 46,055 47,439 48,133 48,133 SERVICES AND CHARGES 263,073 307,208 317,102 317,942 317,942 CAPITAL OUTLAY 1,889 3,300 3,300 3,500 3,300 TRANSFERS O 0 --------0 O TOTAL --- ----- 3201024 -- -O 363,996 387,337 386,691 386,891 mm===am== am===mo== mm==a=m== mmmmvaamm aaaeaaama RECEIPTS: FY86 FY84 FY83 FINAL ACTUAL ESTIMATE BUDGET PROPERTY TAX 211,761 43t734 7t,701 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 71063 2,000 2,000 SALE OF PARTS 1,994 11000 11000 ROAD USE TAX 296,239 715,242 308,190 MISCELLANEOUS -- 4,967 4,000 4,000 520,024 365,996 386,891 a -=m=amas =ma=mm=a= =s=oa=ve= CITY OF IOWA CITY FY86 EXPENDITURESDGET 14100 TRAFFIC ENGINEERING �+J PERSONAL SERYICESt TRANSFER TOt FTE BUDGET NONE 0 ... ...... ......... TOTAL 0 FYtlS FY66 i c°casssss .iI TRAFFIC ENGINEERING 1.00 .00 S y2 II TRAFFIC ENG SIGNS 1.00 �.00 6�10I �NGINEER'TECH PTRIFFIC ENG .00 ,00 4,570 III - 4AFFI6 ENGINEERING IND .00 pp0,4SS HRICIAN 2.00 L 00 {y1,4tl46 - rClRONCCB TECHNICIAN I;00 I.00 3�;g± INTRA -CITY CHANGEtlACKSt RIME NGINEER 1 pp p po 59 - GEYITY 12 865 VEHICLE RCPRIAICCMERT I5:552 9,529 WORD PROCESSING 8 LTH INSURAYCE 12787 ADMINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD E/DISABILITY INSUR 1,394 CBD MAIN EN NCR' TOTAL 8.00 8.00 219,316 34,517, sass suss: ssssssass TOTAL sasasoao. w CAPITAL OUTLAYI OPERATING EQUIPMENT 3,500 3 500 TOTAL ucuaaitsss I Mi EXPENDITURES: PERSONAL SERVICES COMMODITIES SERVICES AND CHARGES CAPITAL OUTLAY TRANSFERS TOTAL RECEIPTS: CITY OF IOWA CITY FY86 OPERATING BUDGET RECEIPTS AND EXPENDITURES SUMMARY 14300 STREET SYSTEM MAINTENANCE PROPERTY TAX CHARGES FOR SERVICES USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY SALE OF PARTS ROAD USE TAX MISCELLANEOUS — FYADDMI,DGET "—FINAL FY84 FY83 DEPT BUDGET 29,999 ACTUAL ESTIMATE REQUEST PROPOSAL BUDGET 427.672 460,465 484,531 484,351 484,53t 177,345 220,693 282,36t 229,061 2P9,061 343,984 439,036 397,037 376,137 376,137 276,491 309,000 318,433 310,163 310,420 1,026 --------- 0 --------- 0 0 0 1,228,318 1,449,216 --------- 1,482,404 --------- 1,399,934 --------- 1,400,189 caxcscasm amaa-azsm zcoa=sz:z aaasxcasc �_xcccome FY66 FY84 FY83 FINAL ACTUAL ESTIMATE BUDGET 29,999 108,614 183,010 6,7690 3.200 3, 000 1,176 1.000 1,000 1,187,713 1, 331. 302 1,208,2P9 2_861 4,900 — -iB —17-22-87—KE-1 1,-228, — — 1,-449,216 —--4_900 1,-400,189 msmaasom msmsmmasm maausmmm u I CITY OF IOWA CITY FY006 OPERATING BUDGET TU 14300 STREETPSYSTEMRMAINTENANCE PERSONAL SERV10ESt TRANSFER TOS FTE BUDGET NONE 0 .-- ------ ......... TOTAL 0 _ FY85 FY86 j sssasatsas M.W.I - STREETS 5.00 5. 0 Bpx945 M.W.II STREETS 4.00 4.8 0 70x772 SR..CLERKITYPI6T - STREETS 1.00 1.00 7x3346 - N W.III - STREETS 5.00 5.00 11,915 SA M W - STREETS 2.00 2.00 4 ,499 ASA I7 AUIT - STREETS 1.00 1.00 p6,7740 'STREET/ ANITATION SUPT .50 ,50 1153,Y69 INTRA -CITY CHARGEBACKSt TEMPORARY EMPLOYEES 45:460 VEHICLE OPERATIONS 51, 0 OVERTIME 7 I LONGEVITY 3:3,800 VEHICLE REPLACEMENT �22: 4 — FICA p8, 420 WORD PROCESSING 0 IPERS 711:646 ADNINISTRA! YCC OVERHEAD 0 _ HEALTH INSURANCE 27:826 CBD MAINTENANCE ---.- -0 LIFE/UISABILITY INSUR 2:781 - _ TOTAL 18.50 18.50 484,551 TOTAL 273,652 ccecc sosss ■asssagos .aassssss CAPITAL OUTLAYt ASPHALT OVERLAY 310,000 SECRETARIAL CHAIR 165 4 -DRAWER FILE CABINET 255 TOTAL 310x420 csmoa_oas ..:, *Street/Sanitation Supt.: 50% of FTE 1s shown here; remainder funded in Refuse Collection Operations and Landfill Operations. CITY OF IOWA CITY FY66 OPERATING BUDGET REC13100 AND EXPENDITURES EXPENDITURES: FY86 ---------- FY86 BUDGE1 ---------- ACTUAL FY84 ACTUAL FY85 ESTIMATE DEPT REQUEST ADMIN PROPOSAL FINAL BUDGET PERSONAL SERVICES 32,997 55,862 63,380 63,380 63,380 COMMODITIES SERVICES AND CHARGES 1.818 49,618 4.156 41,291 42,532 42.592 16,725 42,592 CAPITAL OUTLAY 20.647 16,760 54,145 --16_885 TOTAL 105,080 1181069 162,381 125,021 125,181 s41m41ma414141 4141a41maaza aaa41a41a41s 4141mz4141a41a o_axsmaaa RECEIPTS: FY86 FY84 ' FY85 FINAL ACTUAL ESTIMATE BUDGET PROPERTY TAX 1022;910 117,894 124,894 MISCELLANEOUS --------- -------- 103,080 1181069 125,181 a41a414141414141 a41a4141-2241= 4141411041-41aa CITY OF IOWA CITY FY86 OPERATING 15100 FORESTRY/HORTICULTURE PERSONAL SERVICESI FTE BUDGET NONE FY85 FY86 6 N W 11 + FORESTRY 1,00,00 16,y01 FBRASTER/HORTICULTURIST 1.00 1,00 25,099 TPNPORARY EMPLOYEES 11 0 ERRTIIHE FICA IPERS HEAL! I1NSURANCE LIFE/ ABILITY INSUR TOTAL ,5565 1:1,17 W W TRANSFER T03 0 TOTAL 0 CgiwaiLii 1,]36 INTRACITY CHARGEBACKSI OPERATIONS 6,483 2.00 2.00 62,724 VEHICLE REPLACCNENT 2,711 zzzsz szssi ssssazsss WORD PROCEABIN ADMINIST AT VE OVERHEAD 0 CBD MAIN EN NCE 0 TOTAL 91195 �zzzaisu :. CAPITAL OUTLAYI 1 2 -DRAWER FILE CABINET 100 TREES 15 TREES FOR NURSERY TOTAL 16,225 16,885 czzccizas. _ EXPENDITURES: PERSONAL SERVICES COMMODITIES CAPITALaallTLAYCHARGES TRANSFERS TOTAL RECEIPTS: CITY OF LONA CITY FY86 OPERATING BUDGET RECEIPTS AND2GO EXPENDITURES SUMMARY PROPERTY TAX LICENSES d PERMITS CEMETERY LOT SALES PERPETUAL CARE INTEREST MISCELLANEOUS -- FY86 BUDGET ---------- FY84 ACTUAL FV89 ESTIMATE DEPT REQUEST ADMIN PROPOSAL FINAL BUDGET 84, 530 87,799 92,646 92,646 92,646 7, 081 7,810 7,925 7,925 7,923 17,356 18, 978 15,523 15,403 15,403 7170 517170 , 8320 5,0320 2, 9240 22,9240 8000 9000 , --------0 --------- --------0 314, 684 --------0 120,419 --------0 139,018 116,474 116,474 amamxmmmm mmmmma=aa mmmmamamm asaass=so a�=sms=as FY86 FY84 FY85 FINAL ACTUAL ESTIMATE BUDGET 91,313 91,991 88,046 9,230 8,789 8,789 7, 143 10,994 10,994 6-355'15 6-400 9-400 --_ _-_ 114,684 _-- 120,419 116,474 =aaax=aos aacxaxaa= accxxxa=a u c FY86T0PERAAT MA BUDGET 1� VJ 15200NCEMETERY PERSONAL SERVICESs TRANSFER TOs FTE BUDGET NONE 0 ••• ••••�• 'TOTAL 0 FY95 FY96 i _ sas ca ,11 CEMETERY 1.00 1.00 16,607 1.00 1:00 005/1]3350S .I1I CEMETERY N N CEMETERY 1.00 1,00 PUAIAAY EMPLOYEES 13:'60+ CEY12Y gg 5,{47 INTRA+CITY CHAkGEBACKSi RS 3:395 5p745 VEHICLE OPERATIONS 3 731 5:00 LTH INSURANJE_ 493 VEHICLE REPLACEMENT69 E/OISABILIT INSUR ..... ..... ......... 0 3.00 92,646 MORD PROCESSING VERFIEAD 0 TOTAL .3.0 CODIMAINTENIANCE 0 TOTAL 9:611 saoaaasat �� CAPITAL OUTLAYI i 4 TREES500 ......... TOTAL sasccapii -� u i EXPENDITURES: PERSONAL SERVICES COMMODITIES SERVICES AND CHARGES CAPITAL OUTLAY TOTAL RECEIPTS: CITY OF IOWA CITY FY86 OPERATING BUDGET RECEIPTS AND EXPENDITURES SUMMARY PROPERTY TAX CHARGES FOR SERVICES RECREATION FEES LESSONS ENTRY FEES POOL ADMISSIONS MISCELLANEOUBNTALS -- FY86 BUDGET ---------- FY84 ACTUAL FY85 ESTIMATE DEPT REQUEST ADMIN PROPOSAL FINAL BUDGET 463, 7B9 385,188 610,576 610,576 35,994 625,229 55,99 42,497 120,043 55,252 131,301 37,334 137,290 132,924 132,92 19,213 23_414 47,210 18,847 ---18_647 645,544 -- 795,155 852,410 818.341 832,994 saoaasmss msoaaooas aaacaaasa ssaaaasaa maaaaaoas FY86 FY84 FY85 FINAL ACTUAL ESTIMATE BUDGET 366,635 458,946 461,870 2,688 33,583 O 64.833 84,904 73,163 102,643 110,263 42.994 58,735 66,863 100,261 89,173 84,000 14,072 18,334 19,048 2_447 6,03_7 ---10_146 645,544 _-- 795,155 832,994 ssasassss ssosassas msaa�-asa CITY OF IOWA CITY -+ - FY86 OPERATING BUDGET EXPENDITURES 16100 RECREATION PERSONAL SERVICES: TRANSFER TO: FTE BUDGET NONE ........0 ... TOM__ 0 FYBS FY86 6 .I -RECREATION G GVMT BLDGS 1,00 1,00 19;31 .iI - RECREATION t 11 CLERK/TYPIST RECREATION 1.00 1.08 10,3 4 IN SEC-RECREAT ON 1'00 1.0 031 Y6 ffRoGRRN SUPERVISOR 3.00 4.00 AEATION SUPERINTENDENT 1.00 1.00 34 INTRACITY CHARGEBACKS8 . RECREATION (PT) .75 .75 ##7.129 NWGRAM SUPERXISOR PT 1.00 .50 3Y0*261 VEHICLE OPERATIONS 5�14 hNARY EMPLOYEES 398 VEHICLE REPLACEMENT - RTIME 1.8 5 WORD PpROCESSING 0 AEVITY 9 9 ADMINISTRAS VE OVERHEAD 0 Rs 4,469 CBD MAINTENANCE _ LTH INSURANCE 1,651 •8.988 E/DISABILITY INSUR w...w. .. TOTAL 9,75 10.25 625,229 TOTAL ssase asssa aassasssa CAPYSAL OUTLAY: - 1B GANG -LOCKER UNITS WEIGHT LIFTING EQUIPMENT BATHROOMTPARTITION60XES TOTAL 1,500 B;847 1,000 7,500 - 18�847 - aaca=a-aa EXPENDITURES: PERSONAL SERVICES C01 MODITIES SERVICES AND CHARGES CAPITAL OUTLAY TRANSFERS TOTAL RECEIPTS: CITY OF I014A CITY FY86 OPERATING BUDGET RECEIPTS AND EXPENDITURES SUMMARY 16200 PARKS PROPERTY TAX USE OF 14014EY & PROPERTY MISCELLANEOUS -- FY86 BUDGET -- -- FY84 FY83 DEPT ADMIN FINAL ACTUAL ESTIMATE REQUEST PROPOSAL BUDGET 263,418 267,932 290,974 284,074 284,074 28,865 26,818 27,397 26,912 26,912 87,857 94,817 85,822 82,520 82,520 1,887 3,000 10,890 3,000 3,000 0 0 10,000 10,000 -------- --------- 382,027 ---10_000 402,567 --------- 415,2133 --------- 406,506 406,506 uammmamm mmmmammmm sraaammmm mmmmmmum mmaaaevma FY86 FY84 FY83 FINAL ACTUAL ESTIMATE BUDGET 377,230 396, 032 403,002 302 304 304 4,473 6,21t 3,200 -- --------- 382,037 --------- 402,567 ------ 406,306 acmaamamm amamaasea asm::aaama i CjiTy OF.IOW CITY FY86 OPEEpRATING BUDGET 16200DPARKSS PERSONAL SERVICES: FSE BUDGET INSURANCE SABILITY INSULA TOTAL t,ES8 3,525 16,984 i;,ge3 1,694 10.0_0 10,00 284,074 iii.- iiiiC iiii3iGii TRANSFER TO: PARKLAND ACQUISITION ---10,00 TOTAL ,00 -C.G:Cii V! -i u 0 10 i �I INTRACITY CHARGEBACKS: VEHICLE OPERATIONS 21,654 VEHICLE REPLACEMENT 37,5210 WORD PROCESSING 0 ADMINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD VERHEAD 0 - TOTAL 55,376 CiiiiFiii CAPITAL OUTLAY: TREESEFOR CITY PARK GREEN 1,000 TOTAL -3,000 CiOGiiiii. FY85 FY96 i .I1 - PARKS PARKS 4.00 3.00 4.00 3.00 74,203 63.279 N.M. PARKS MOWING .p80 1,00 00 110,0 5B 91 Ks SBPERINTENOBNTSTRUCTION 1,00 31,738 INSURANCE SABILITY INSULA TOTAL t,ES8 3,525 16,984 i;,ge3 1,694 10.0_0 10,00 284,074 iii.- iiiiC iiii3iGii TRANSFER TO: PARKLAND ACQUISITION ---10,00 TOTAL ,00 -C.G:Cii V! -i u 0 10 i �I INTRACITY CHARGEBACKS: VEHICLE OPERATIONS 21,654 VEHICLE REPLACEMENT 37,5210 WORD PROCESSING 0 ADMINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD VERHEAD 0 - TOTAL 55,376 CiiiiFiii CAPITAL OUTLAY: TREESEFOR CITY PARK GREEN 1,000 TOTAL -3,000 CiOGiiiii. EXPE14D I TURES: PERSONAL SERVICES COMMODITIES SERVICES AND CHARGES CAPITAL OUTLAY TRANSFERS TOTAL RECEIPTS: CITY OF IOWA CITY FY86 OPERATING BUDGET RECEIPTS AN6306PENDITURES SUMMARY PROPERTY TAX LIBRARY FINES LIBRARY SERVICES INTEREST INCOME MISCELLANEOUS cHARGEBACK 1 � 1 ---FINAL FY84 ACTUAL FY83 ESTIMATE REQUEST PROPOSAL BUDGET -- DEPT FY86 BUDGET ADMIN ---FINAL FY84 ACTUAL FY83 ESTIMATE REQUEST PROPOSAL BUDGET 723,394 726;936 8a7 840 827,910 815,716 37 610 24,032 167, 693 173, 980 188,940 188,4130 188,400 134-2230 123,3070 130,9130 134,4903 aavnz_vna --134=2230 1,242,698 0 110910,315 1, 166. 391 aazssaoaa 1. 163, 331 aaasaaaaa 1,165,831 oanazamaz aaaaasaa aaaasaoaa FY86 FY84 ACTUAL FY83 ESTIMATE FINAL BUDGET 894,342 933,319 33,961 986,940 40,088 36,433 96,632 113,380 123,968 0 0 7,562 12.841 12, 333 2, 300 _S, 1,042,698 1,098,313 1,163,831 noesn:a:a aaoamznza aavnz_vna I ;LIBRARIIANB„ IN SEC LI RAAY MND PART COORD RANY COORD v JANY COORD ►uv ennan . START I PLDVEES a� CITY OF IOWA CITY LIQ g� FY86 EXPENDIITUREBDCET 16300 LIBRARY I PERSONAL SERY10E59 TRANSFER TOi ca FTE BUDGET NONE 0 INSURANCE SABILITY INSUR TOTAL 900655• 16.915 CAPITAL OUTLAYi _. 460675 1 TYPEWRITER 1,000 _ 300717 LIBRARY HATERSALS 1290250 40 061] AV EOUIPMEN! EPLACEMENT 30500 401 BILLV6CANNER ON COIN CHANGE 475 — ............ ......... 26.50 26.50 615,716 TOTAL L34,225 — =aP== qa=i= isass==i= a==a=C=sa l TOTAL 0 FYBS FYB6 3.00 3,00 2;00 335943;1650 I ;00 70:3010 42x190 II.00.00 11.00 111.00 1x037 1;00 0,234 INTRACITY CHARGEBACKSi MULATION 1,00 1.00 .00 1.00 20 4 VEHICLE OP Epp IONS 0 0 UNI Y SER ORM SERVv 1.00 .00 1.00 9063 29.703 VEHICLE REPLBlENENT WOpD PROCCSSI G HNICAL 8ER.00r00 $0$75 ADNIMISTRATIV¢ OVERHEAD MAINTENAN``E TH SERVICE 000 000' 0 4 CBD OR 1;00 1,00 39,790 TOTAL ......... 0 (PT) 22.75 2. 5 43x675 „ (PT 1.50 1.50 21x40 =aaasssi,s ,50 050 90o1B ((PT1 PT) 1.75 1.75 400934 INSURANCE SABILITY INSUR TOTAL 900655• 16.915 CAPITAL OUTLAYi _. 460675 1 TYPEWRITER 1,000 _ 300717 LIBRARY HATERSALS 1290250 40 061] AV EOUIPMEN! EPLACEMENT 30500 401 BILLV6CANNER ON COIN CHANGE 475 — ............ ......... 26.50 26.50 615,716 TOTAL L34,225 — =aP== qa=i= isass==i= a==a=C=sa l i EXPENDITURES: PERSONAL SERVICES COMMODITIES CAPITALSOUTLAYCHARGES TOTAL RECEIPTS: PROPERTY TAX CITY OF IOWA CITY FY86 OPERATING BUDGET RE16500SPARKSE& RECREATIOONSADMINY -- FY86 BUDGET ---------- FY84 FY83 DEPT REQUEST ADMIN PROPOSAL FINAL BUDGET ACTUAL ESTIMATE p�piii pipiitsii 66, 67,958 72,486 72,486 72,486 22t i, 7240 55 2,2470 2.360 2, 390 2,364 2, 390_ ---77,570 ---77,570 ---68,729 70,470 ---75,115 sasssszvi ccpvivzvp vaiisviai p6Siiapii iopxspces FY86 FY84 ACTUAL FY85 ESTIMATE BUOGEI 68,729 70,470 -- 77s570 —_—_-68, 729 ---70, 470 77,570 p�piii pipiitsii CAPITAL OUTLAYI DIRF.CTORIS DESK TYPEWRITER TOTAL 0 w 690 _1,500 2,390 t- i CITY OF IOWA CITY FY86 EXPENDITURESOGET '+1 16500 PARKS i REE CREATION ADMIN PERSONAL SERVICES9 TRANSFER TO: FTE BUDGET NONE 0 . ...... ...... .. TOTAL 0 — FY85.. FY86 ADMIN, SEC PARKS i REC 1,00 1.00 19,859 42,510 — PARKS i REIREATION DIRECTOR 1,00 IND OVERTIME 100 LONGEVITY 3310' ` 44 HEALTH INSURANCE 4x561 INTRA -CITY CHARGEBACKS't LIFE/DISABILITY INSUR495 " ��� VEHICLE OPERATIONS 0 TOTAL 2,00 2,00 72,486 VEHICLE REPLACEMENT O i=ns= =coup mania=mss WORD PROCESSING 0 ADMINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD 0 .« CBD MAINTENANCE 0 TOTAL. 0 CAPITAL OUTLAYI DIRF.CTORIS DESK TYPEWRITER TOTAL 0 w 690 _1,500 2,390 t- i a i EXPENDITURES: PERSONAL SERVICES COMMODITIES SERVICES AND CHARGES CAPITAL OUTLAY TRANSFERS TOTAL RECEIPTS: CITY OF IOWA CITY FY86 OPERATING BUDGET RECEIPTS AND EXPENDITURES SUMMARY 16700 SENIOR CENTER PROPERTY TAX MISCELLANEOUBENTAL HGENC ---------- FY86 BUDGET---------- FY83 FY84 FY83 DEPT ADMIN FINAL ACTUAL ESTIMATE REQUEST PROPOSAL BUDGET 100,838 102,073 109,865 109,865 109,865 4,424 6,439 6,186 5,886 31886 64,303 71,977 79,728 78,965 78,965 8,426 15,924 12,000 1,500 3,350 4,000 4,000 4#000 4#000 4,000 181,993 200,433 211,779 200,216 202,066 amnnamaca acaxxnasa amsnxnaca aasxsxnaa nnxxmxsx FY86 FY64 FY83 FINAL ACTUAL ESTIMATE BUDGET 147,918 160,280 161,592 33,!60 40,066 40,461 --------- 181,993 --------- 200,433 --------- 202,066 nenxnaaca arnssasaa saxannaam CITY OF IOWA CITY f FY86 OPERATING BUDGET EXPENDITURES 16700 SENIOR CENTER PERSONAL SERVICES$ TRANSFER TOS CAPITAL OUTLAY: TYBEOR1TER MODIFY GRANITE SIGN TOTAL 1,500 :e5O -3,360 a���oacaa FTE BUDGET PARKING OPERATIONS TOTAL _4,000 4,000 FY85 FY86 i 'iociesaa ST - OR. CENTER 1.00 1.0 7,3343 NT ER 1.00 1.058,238 LIST -SR CENTER 1.00 1.00 1.00 4444 90 78:09 ROINATO� 1.00 OYEES 9 4,600 INTRA -CITY CHARGEBACKS$ 6,473 4.530 VEHICLE OPERATIONS TO? YEINSUR 6,39 701 VEHICLE RMACCNCNT WORD PROCESSING 3,85 8 . ..• ••••••••• ADNINISTIAT VE OVERHEAD 0 — TOTAL l,00 4 icr� �aait asFptsaio -____-__. TOTAL 4,064 wiaitita. '�' 1 CAPITAL OUTLAY: TYBEOR1TER MODIFY GRANITE SIGN TOTAL 1,500 :e5O -3,360 a���oacaa i CITY OF I014A CITY FY86 OPERATING BUDGET PARKING OPERATIONS FY84 FY85 FY86 ACTUAL ESTIMATE BUDGET BEGINNING BALANCE-- 612,820 641_878 --- ---477,140 TOTAL BALANCE 612,820641,878 -- 477_140 --- PARKING FINES -- 116,322 126,804 124,800 126,500 111,000 172.100 INTEREST INCOME BUILDING RENTALS 5,006 7.668 6,120 PARKING RAMP REVENUE 682,297 300,941 980,620 350,075 1,104,050 387.873 OTHER PARKING REVENUE GENERAL FUND - MISC 4'900 4 600 4 333 MISCELLANEOUS -------902 -1-1-1-1---1600 ---------- TOTAL RECEIPTS 1,236,272 1.592.263 1,753,476 PERSONAL SERVICES -450,705 -30,477 -499,900 -19,392 -561,290 -21,246 COMMODITIES SERVICES AND CHARGES -195,380 -217,122 -227,123 CAPITAL OUTLAY --3,386 -30,600 -20,600 TRANSFERS -527,266 -989,987 -------757---001 -832,765 --it-i-6-6-37-0-2-4- TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS --1-20-----,214 _17,207 _1__ ENDING BALANCE 641,878 477.140 597,592 nvmvavvvvv vsanosavvv vvvvvvvaav i CITY OF IOWA CITY FY86 OPERATING BUDGET RECEIPTS AND EXPENDITURES SUMMARY 41100 PARKING OPERATIONS EXPENDITURES: PERSONAL SERVICES COMMODITIES SERVICES AND CHARGES CAPITAL OUTLAY TRANSFERS RECEIPTS: PARKING FINES INTEREST INCOME BUILDING RENTALS PARKING RAMP REVENUE OTHER PARKING REVENUE GENERAL FUND - MIBC MISCELLANEOUS -- FY86 BUDGET ---------- FY84 FY85 DEPT ADMIN FINAL ACTUAL ESTIMATE REGUEST PROPOSAL BUDGET 450,705 499,900 561,290 561,290 561,290 30,477 19,392 22,296 21,246 21,246 195,380 217,122 133,939 227,123 227,123 3,386 30,600 20,600 20,600 20,600 527,266 --------- 989,987 --------- 0 --------- 1,052,765 832,765 1,207,214 1.757,001 738,143 -1-,B8-3-,0--2-4 ------------ t, 883, 024- 1-,663-,-02- 4 mQcccsamm mmcQxxcam macxascmx mmmaamaam xccacax:a FY86 FY84 FY85 FINAL ACTUAL ESTIMATE BUDGET 116,322 124,800 111,000 126,804 126,500 172,100 50006 5,6681 6,120 682,297 980,620 1,104,050 300,941 330,075 383,873 4,000 4#000 4,000 ----- 902 ----- 600 333 1,236,272 1#592,263 ----- 1,783,476 i2C a0 OQ x CO x Q i OYEES CITY IF IOWA CITY FY8 41100 EXPENDITURES PARKIN D OPERATIONS PERSONAL SERVICES$ 25,341 39,964 FTE BUDGET YLINSUR �....3�159 25.50 25.50 561,290 TOTAL amaca Samoa ■Saasoaaa FV65 FVB6 i ;MS 7.00 2000 011543 ATTENDANT 3'00 j4.00 '00 1;00 70.147 ISTEMS 1.00 1.00 4#504 ) 0109 �HTMCREMTER .00 567 E, ;TENS CLEC. .00 ,00 11:061 iRINTENDENT PY) .00 .00 '60 $ ATTENDANT .50 PT) 1.50 1.50' bb39;114t4 14t HO OYEES 5,000 3,000 32,472 25,341 39,964 YLINSUR �....3�159 25.50 25.50 561,290 TOTAL amaca Samoa ■Saasoaaa TRANSFER TO$ GGENEJAL FUND PpARKING FINES 111,000 RENEAL i IM�ROYEMENT RES 60,000 BONDSL INTEREST SINKING 641.76¢ INTERFUND LOAN REP YMENT 20�00� TOTAL 832,765 caaaaacaa. INTRAOCITY CHARGEBACKS$ VEHCE pEPRRCLMENT 6.360 AONINIISOppRIEITSYBGOVERHEAD 89.990 CBp MIINTENANCE TOTAL 104,545 ccsasaaas CAPITAL OUTLAY; 100 PARKING METERS 20'00 600 4 CASHIER CHAIRS TOTAL_20_,600 _a=t=_ -a= BEGINNING BALANCE TOTAL BALANCE INTEREST INCOME TRANSFER FROM OPERATIONS MISCELLANEOUS TOTAL RECEIPTS SERVICES AND CHARGES CAPITAL OUTLAY TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS ENDING BALANCE CITY OF IOWA CITY FY86 OPERATING BUDGET PARKING, BOND 4 INT SINKING FY84 FY85 FY86 ACTUAL ESTIMATE BUDGET 284,882 ---------- 286,843 290,979 ---------- 284,882 ---------- 286,843 290,979 ---------- 0 ---------- O ---------- O 447,32; 448,8609 641,7650 41,7605 447,591 448,863 641,763 ---------- 0 ---------- 0 ---------- 0 -443,630 ---------- -444,729 -636,400 ---------- -443,630 ---------- ---------- -444,729 ---------- -636,400 ---------- 286,843 290,979 296,344 vssweacva. me=aaa.... .......... CITY OF IOWA CITY FY86 OPERATING BUDGET PARKING, BOND RESERVE FY84 FYBO FY86 ACTUAL ESTIMATE BUDGET BEGINNING BALANCE 423,601 403.601 -- 430,601 TOTAL BALANCE --- 433_601 ---433_601 403_601 INTEREST INCOME -- 0 -------- 0 _------- 0 TOTAL RECEIPTS -------- 0 0 ---------0 SERVICES AND CHARGES 0 0 0 TRANSFERS ---------- ----- ----- TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS ---------- 0 O 0 ENDING BALANCE 403,601 455,601 400,601 =====Mumma 10mmaaaaoa a���eaa:am CITY OF IOWA CITY FY86 OPERATING BUDGET PARKING, RENEWAL 6 IMPROV RES FY84 FY85 FY86 ACTUAL ESTIMATE BUDGET BEGINNING BALANCE 283 57,468 ---------- 22,468 ---------- TOTAL BALANCE ---------- 283 ----57_468 --- 22,468 INTEREST INCOME TRANSFER FROM OPERATIONS ------ 60,000 --- 60_ 000 60,000 --- TOTAL RECEIPTS 60,000 60,000 ---------- 60,000 ---------- SERVICES AND CHARGES CAPITAL OUTLAY ---------- 0 -2,810 0 -95,0000 0 -50,0000 TRANSFERS TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS---_ 2,815 --_ 95_000 ---_50_000 ENDING BALANCE -57,468 22,46B ..o.w..e .......... ..sa...e i CITY OF IOHA CITY FY86 OPERATING BUDGET POLLUTION CONTROL OPERATIONS FY84 ACTUAL FY83 ESTIMATE FY86 BUDGET BEGINNING BALANCE 247,064-- 391,338 -- 304,620 TOTAL BALANCE - 391,338 -t,439,--- 394,629 -1,466,523 CHARGES FOR SERVICES __247,0__6_4 i, 412, 766 82.03049 , 439. 768 21.800 21.2010 INTEREST INCOME SALE OF PARTS INTERFUND LOAN REPAYMENT 43,600 1,335 0 720 0 720 MISCELLANEOUS ----- ---------- ---------- TOTAL RECEIPTS 1,480,061 -1_461_689 -1_488_444 PERSONAL SERVICES -432,996 -27, 646 -403,038 -72, 890 -487,412 -72, 410 COMMODITIES SERVICES AND CHARGES -344,4000 -400_7700 -4a1,�00 CAPITAL OUTLAY -030,720 -060,816 -002.430 TRANSFERS ---------- ---------- TOTAL D98HURGEMENTS --------- _1_330_767 _1_498_422 _1.030,793 ENDING BALANCE 391.308 304,620 307,276 O3ii3iSiO0 iCII�iII3�SII iiiiIIiiII30 CITY OF IOWA CITY FY86 OPERATING BUDGET I/� - i RECEIPTS At -AD EXPENDITURES SUMMARY i 42100 POLLUTION CONTROL OPERATIONS (� I EXPENDITURES: ---------- FY86 BUDGET ---------- BUDGE) ACTUAL ESTIMATE REQUEST PROPOSAL PERSONAL SERVICES 432,996 455,038 408,217 487,412 487,412 COMMODITIES 27,646 72,895 73,730 72,410 72,410 SERVICES AND CHARGES 344,400 400,973 276,891 422,036 422,036 CAPITAL OUTLAY 0 700 0 1.500 11500 I TRANSFERS 530,723 568,816 --------- ------- 0 352,433 --------- 552,435 --------- TOTAL --------- 1,335,767 1,498,422 838, 838 i, 535, 793 1, 535, 793 msssamava vmaamvcav amasvaays wvvvvavo saasvmasm RECEIPTS: FY86 FY84 FY85 FINAL ACTUAL ESTIMATE BUDGET , CHARGES FOR SERVICES 1,412,766 1,439,768 1,466,523 INTEREST INCOME 22,008 21,201 21,201 BALE OF PARTS 349 0 0 INTERFUND LOAN REPAYMENT 43,600 0 0 MISCELLANEOUS 1,330 720 720 - k 1,480,061 1,461,689 154887444 l@t 4hF$L i oaooavaas svoaaasaa asasaasva - CITY OF 10W1t CITY FY86 EXPENDITURESDCET 42100 POLLUTION CONTROL OPERATIONS PERSONAL SERVICESt TRANSFER TOt FTE BUDGET BOND G INTEREST SINKING 101,921 A ATEA GO BONDS 414,514 I R NEPAL L IMPROVMENT RES 24,0 0 J FY85 FY66 $ BOND i INTEREST ES 12000 TOTAL 552,435 M Y.II POpLLUTION CENTROL 2.00 7.00 36,632 aaasaaaaa SA CLERK/TYPIST-POLE CONTRO 1.OQ .00 6,H 6 ASLT T.P.O. w POLL. L�ONTROL 33.0 3.00 56, B M.Y. II.PpoLy CONT, COL ECTIO 1,00 1.00 7 ,50( T..1 0 POLLUTION CONT110E 6.00 4.00 Bi, {65 N. III POLL. CONT, PLANT 2.00 42.00 42,,0 CAE618T .00 .00 3,5 5 INTRACITY CHARGEBACKSi SR N W POLLUTION CONTROL 1.00 1.00 0 0987 y yy 6 ASIT IDT POLLUTION CONTROL 1.00 ,00 pA.77Byy VENIC E OP RATIONS 10:761 -� POLLUTION CONTROL SUPT 1.00 1.00 35,164 VENICE REE�ACENENT TEMPORARY EMPLOYEES 110.920 WORD PROCES IMG yy 6,Q00 ADMINI¢TRATAVE OVERHEAD 160,600 f OONCfVITY 4,x`75 CBD MAaINTEN NCE 0 ICA o, ......... HEALTH INSURANCE 2'5 5 TOTAL 192,365 LIFE/DISABILITY INSUR 2,934 -_ zxxmxzm ..... ..... ......... i TUTAL 17.00 17.00 487,412 =Xmas sass■ ■ssssasse CAPITAL OUTLAYS TOXIC GAS METER 1,5_00 . . TOTAL sasasasit0i BEGINNING BALANCE TOTAL BALANCE INTEREST INCOME TRANSFER FROM OPERATIONS TOTAL RECEIPTS SERVICES AND CHARGES TRANSFERS TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS ENDING BALANCE CITY OF IOWA CITY FY86 OPERATING BUDGET POLL CON, RENEW 6 IMPR RES FY84 FY85 FY86 ACTUAL ESTIMATE BUDGET 494,100 592,086 685,028 494,100 592,086 683,028 ---------- 73,986 ---------- 68,942 68,942 66,942 24,000 24,000 _-- 24,000 --- ----- 97,986 --- ----- 92_942 --_ 92,942 -_-------0 0 0 ---------- ------- -- O -------- ---------- O ---------- ---------- 392, 086 685,028 777,970 aaawaaasa scccs=cacs casaaecacs i BEGINNING BALANCE TOTAL BALANCE INTEREST INCOME TRANSFER FROM OPERATIONS TOTAL RECEIPTS SERVICES AND CHARGES TRANSFERS TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS ENDING BALANCE CITY OF IOWA CITY FY86 OPERATING BUDGET POLL CON, BOND 6 INT RES FY84 FY83 FY86 ACTUAL ESTIMATE BUDGET 203,108 248,362 285,894 205,108 2487362 253,8_94 ----29,296 ----31,254 ----23.332 12,000 ---- ----12 43.254 ---- ----12_000 37,332 41,296 ----------0 ---------- ---------- 00 0 ------- -- 0 ---------� 0 246,362 285.894 327,190 aaazaaaaaz samsaaasmo aamsoamzmz m CITY OF IOWA CITY ��/,,, Ll FY86 OPERATING BUDGET I POLL CON, BOND & INT SINKING FY84 FY83 FY86 ACTUAL ESTIMATE BUDGET i BEGINNING BALANCE 92,377 110,723 120,160 TOTAL BALANCE 92,377 110,723 --- 120,160 INTEREST INCOME 13,471 11,331 10,447 TRANSFER FROM OPERATIONS 102,840 101,834 101,921 MISCELLANEOUS 0 0 0 '.- TOTAL RECEIPTS 118,311 - 113,183 112,368 SERVICES AND CHARGES - - - - - - - - 0 - - - - - - - - - - 0 ---------- 0 CAPITAL OUTLAY -100,163 -103,730 -100,637 TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS ---- --- - -100,163 ------ - -103,730 ---- -- - -100,637 ENDING BALANCE 110,723 120,160 R, 131,891 aasaessa:a sascassasc aasaaasaaa 4i I 1 i R'I ^ CITY OF IOWA CITY FYBWATERROPERATIONSET FY84 ACTUAL FY83 ESTIMATE FY86 BUDGET BEGINNING BALANCE —8.423 61.244 ---------- 36,281 TOTAL BALANCE ---------- —8.423 61.244 36,281 ---------- ---------- 1,782.388 1,808,660 1'966,720 3.783 WATER SALES INTEREST INCOME 3,927 77,067 3,783 42,464 42.464 SALE OF PARTS SALES TAX COLLECTED FOR STATE 39, 674 130,000 63,2200 63.2200 TRANSFER FROM RESERVES 3.714 12,000 2,000 MISCELLANEOUS ---- ------ 2,078_970 ---------- ---------- 0-7-8---18-7 TOTAL RECEIPTS —1_930_147 —2— PERSONAL SERVICES —_-313,097 _71,0813 —341,699 —228.313 —389.890 —213.313 COMMODITIES SERVICES AND CHARGES —766,061 _317,666 —396,079 —219,000 —681,372 —233.300 CAPITAL OUTLAY —341,391 —330,017 —267.978 TRANSFERS ____---- —2_009_303 ---------- ---------- -1,988_033 TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS -1_933_110 ENDING BALANCE 61,244 56,281 146,413 a=Mammmamo W..= ..... M w1mm.sacma FY86TOPERATING BUDGET RECEIPTS AND EXPENDITURES SUMMARY 43100 WATER OPERATIONS EXPENDITURES: RECEIPTS: WATER SALES INTEREST INCOME SALE OF PARTS SALES TAX COLLECTED FOR TRANSFER FROM RESERVES MISCELLANEOUS FY84 ACTUAL ESTIMATE DEPT - REQUEST FY86 BUDGET -- QUDGEI 1,782,388 1, SOS, 680 1,966,720 77,067 PROPOSAL 42,464 PERSONAL SERVICES 913,097 71,088 341,699 2?8,313 879,890 989,890 989.890 SERVICES SERVICER AND CHARGES CAPITAL OUTLAY 766,061 396,079 237,313 706,390 213,313 681,372 213,319 TRANSFERS 317,666 219,000 330,017 210,300 233,300 681,372 233,300 -341,391 - --------- 0 267,978 267,978 TOTAL 2, 009, 303 ____cacao 1,933,110 --------- 1,734,493 1, 988, 033 1, 985, 033 xaoax .a. aaxocaoaa aiaaxaaao caaa-axao RECEIPTS: WATER SALES INTEREST INCOME SALE OF PARTS SALES TAX COLLECTED FOR TRANSFER FROM RESERVES MISCELLANEOUS FY84 FY83 FINAL ACTUAL ESTIMATE BUDGET 1,782,388 1, SOS, 680 1,966,720 77,067 42,464 42,464 59,874 63,220 63,220 110,000 -___2,0 __-_ -- -_12,000 O 2,078,970 1,930,147 -- 2,078,187 ca_aca_aa macaaxmam o -c xcacaa , MATER • NATER SERV NATER NET T,P,O I WlTER OF • MATER ANT 0 WATER N • WATER DI ,-WATER _COST, FY8610PERATINO BUDGET EXPENDITURES 43100 NATER OPERATIONS PERSONAL SERV10ES1 FTE BUDGET FYB5 FYB6 t 2,00 pp.00 32,267 3,00 3:00 49:645 ICE 2,00 12,00 35: Be ERR REPAIR 7 00p 4;00 yyA6�B54 OFF WATER INSURANCE SABILITY INSUR TOTAL 21'000 2;556 16,052 34:526 3,604 22.00 22:00 589,690 sates axaac saacaaacs TRANSFER T01 RENEWAL G IMPROVEMENT RES 36,000 BOND C INTEREST SINKING 1T7:B54 ED GO BONDg BOND L INTERES RESERVE 30100 .. .www.• TOTAL 267,976 ammmvxCia INTRAPCITY CHARGEBACKSI VEHICLE OPERATIONS 60,900 VEHICLE REPLACEMENT 30:396 MORD PROCESSING 100 ADMINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD 205,60D CBD MAINTENANCE TOTAL cciibsaso CAPITAL OUTLAYf ROOF REPAIR 30,000 INSTALL OR REP¢ACE MAINS 149:000 LABORATOR CCUIPMENT 4:S00 WATER METERS _ 50:000 TOTAL 233,500 sscsssssa. 60155 300 3,00 62: 63 J;oo M ATER STRIBUTION t.00 1, 00 .00 :00 24,113 23537 SERVICE .00 00 111,00 1:00 24:,106 3:427 15:65 T 00 1,00' INSURANCE SABILITY INSUR TOTAL 21'000 2;556 16,052 34:526 3,604 22.00 22:00 589,690 sates axaac saacaaacs TRANSFER T01 RENEWAL G IMPROVEMENT RES 36,000 BOND C INTEREST SINKING 1T7:B54 ED GO BONDg BOND L INTERES RESERVE 30100 .. .www.• TOTAL 267,976 ammmvxCia INTRAPCITY CHARGEBACKSI VEHICLE OPERATIONS 60,900 VEHICLE REPLACEMENT 30:396 MORD PROCESSING 100 ADMINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD 205,60D CBD MAINTENANCE TOTAL cciibsaso CAPITAL OUTLAYf ROOF REPAIR 30,000 INSTALL OR REP¢ACE MAINS 149:000 LABORATOR CCUIPMENT 4:S00 WATER METERS _ 50:000 TOTAL 233,500 sscsssssa. CITY OF IOWA CITY FY86 OPERATING BUDGET WATER, DEPR, EXT & IMPR RES FY84 FY80 FY86 ACTUAL ESTIMATE BUDGET BEGINNING BALANCE 3t3,928 ---------- 208,792 O TOTAL BALANCE 313,928 ---------- 208,792 ---------- 0 INTEREST INCOME ---------- 08,864 ---------- 26.026 ---------- 21000 TRANSFER FROM OPERATIONS 3_6,000 36,00_0 3_6,_00_0 TOTAL RECEIPTS 94,864 T 62,926 38_000 SERVICES AND CHARGES 0 0 ___ 0 CAPITAL OUTLAY 0 0 0 TRANSFERS -100,000 -321,318 0 TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS -1001000 ---------- -321.318 ---------- 0 ---------- ENDING BALANCE 258,792 0 38,000 snansnanan saaeaasmaa aaanonsnsn i �i FY83 I ACTUAL ESTIMATE VNf 60,652 71,049 76,174 BEGINNING BALANCE TOTAL BALANCE INTEREST INCOME TOTAL RECEIPTS SERVICES AND CHARGES TRANSFERS TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS ENDING BALANCE 0 CITY OF IOWA CITY FY86 OPERATING BUDGET WATER, OPER RESERVE FY84 FY83 FY86 ACTUAL ESTIMATE BUDGET 60,652 71,049 76,174 --- 76_174 ----63_602 5,397 ----71,049 5,t23 3,t23 ---------- 0,397 ---------- ---------- -----0_120 -_-_ -----0,120 0 0 0 ---------- ------- -� ---------- - - U ---------- ---------- -------71,049 71,049 76,174 81,299 zzzzazzzaz saazzamzaa zzzzzzsaaa i BEGINNING BALANCE TOTAL BALANCE INTEREST INCOME TRANSFER FROM OPERATIONS TOTAL RECEIPTS SERVICES AND CHARGES TRANSFERS TOTAL DISBURSEMENT' ENDING BALANCE CITY OF IOWA CITY FY86 OPERATING BUDGET WATER, BOND & INT RESERVE FY84 FY87 FY86 ACTUAL ESTIMATE BUDGET 370,139 462,666 481,808 ---------- ---------- ---------- 370,139 462,666 481,808 ---------- ----- ----- ---------- 62,727 39,142 22,692 30,000 30,000 30,000 ---------- ----- ----- ---------- 92, 727 69,142 32,692 ---------- ---------- ---------- 0 0 0 0 -70,000 -70,000 ---------- ----- -------- 0 ----- -70,000 ---------- -70,000 462,666 481,808 484,700 oasasaasaa aasxsaxaxa sasaasasss I i - I CITY OF IOWA CITY FY86 OPERATING BUDGET i WATER BOND k INT SINKING I I i FY84 FY83 ACTUAL ESTIMATE i BEGINNING BALANCE ---- 137_218 ---173_393 TOTAL BALANCE ---137,218_' ---173,393 23, 388 14, 733 - INTEREST INCOME TRANSFER FROM OPERATIONS 169,016 -- 213,937 -'194, 604 230,690 J TOTAL RECEIPTS -------- ---------- ---------- SERVICES AND CHARGES 0 CAPITAL OUTLAY -138,227 -212_902 TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS --_138_227 --_212_902 i ENDING BALANCE 173,393 191,383 I = amaaamamaa aanaaaamas I i I — I 1 r i FY86 BUDGET 191,383 191,383 18,198 179,124 t97,322 -170,408 -170,408 218, 297 mam===ma== CITY OF IOWA CITY FY86 OPERATING BUDGET REFUSE COLLECTION OPERATIONS FY84 FY83 FY86 ACTUAL ESTIMATE BUDGET BEGINNING BALANCE ----- 224 0 ---- 2_772 TOTAL BALANCE -224 0 ---------- 2,772 ---------- LICENSES & PERMITS ---------- 29 218 0 REFUSE COLLECTION FEES 433,090 441,732 373,630 INTEREST INCOME 961 200 200 CBD MAINT CHAROEBACKS 6,203 6,313 6,841 PROPERTY TAX 82,832 96,193 0 MISCELLANEOUS 923 0 0 TOTAL RECEIPTS 324,062 344,880 362,691 PERSONAL SERVICES -237,380 -231,384 -261,981 COMMODITIES -91990 -3,331 -3,143 SERVICES CHARGES -276,4608 -286,9930 -297,6330 AND TRANSF---------0 ---------0 ---------- TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS --323,638 --- --_342_108 -362,779 ---------- ENDING BALANCE O 2,772 22,684 aasaeoaeaa aaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaooaa i I -- i i ---------- FY84 I �J ADMIN FINAL i ESTIMATE REQUEST PROPOSAL BUDGET 237.380 II 261.981 261.981 261.981 9. 990 3,531 4,145 3, 145 3,145 0 276468 286.993 248.462 1 1 ljj 297.653 J 0 y -0 523.838 542.108 314.588 562,779 1 amaimammi seaaamaia imcIIOIIami J s�amsoaxa EXPENDITURES: PERSONAL SERVICES COMMODITIES SERVICES AND CHARGES TRANSFERS TOTAL RECEIPTS: CITY OF IOWA C[TY FY86 OPERATING BUDGET RECEIPTS AND EXPENDITURES SUMIIARY 44100 REFUSE COLLECTION OPERATIONS LICENSES k PERMITS INTERESCOLLECTT INCOME N FEES CBD MAINT CHARGEBACKS PROPERTY TAX MISCELLANEOUS -- FY86 BUDGET ---------- FY84 FY85 DEPT ADMIN FINAL ACTUAL ESTIMATE REQUEST PROPOSAL BUDGET 237.380 251.584 261.981 261.981 261.981 9. 990 3,531 4,145 3, 145 3,145 0 276468 286.993 248.462 297.653 297.653 0 0 -0 523.838 542.108 314.588 562,779 562,779 amaimammi seaaamaia imcIIOIIami imamsIIaIIa s�amsoaxa FY86 FY04 ' FY85 FINAL ACTUAL ESTIMATE BUDGET 29 218 O 433,961 0 441,732 575,630 200 200 6, 20'5 6,513 6,841 82,925 96,190 ------- 0 --------- 5_2_4_,0_62 --------- 5_4_4_,8_8_0 5_8_2,691 _ CITY OF IOWA CITY FY86 EXPENOISURESDGET 44100 REFUSE COLLECTION OPERATIONS PERSONAL SERVICESI TRANSFER TO: FTE BUDGET NONE 0 ...... ...... _ TOTAL 0 FY85 FY66 4 .I - REFUSE 6.00 6,00 102,082 I REFUSE 4.00 4.00 76.621 g�e SUPT -qq5U ID WASTE .50 0 13,3 3 MARYNENPLOYEEBUPi .25 •�5 ;KTIME0060 GEVITV 2,106 INTRA -CITY CHARGEBACKSt A 15,069 RS 11,745 VEHICLE OPERATIONS 94 03g LTH INSURANCE 1919 VEHICLE REPLACEMENT 46,740 — E/DISABILITY INSUR _ 1,,1502 MORD PROCESSING 0 .... .... ADMINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD 43,496 _ TOTAL 10.75 10.75' 261,981 CBD MAINTENANCE 0 =.F. TOTAL 164,266 CAPITAL OUTLAYi — NONE 0 — TOTAL 0 _ ==c=ca==c *Asst. Supt. -Solid Waste: 50% of HE is shown here; remainder funded 1n Landfill Operations. **Street/Sanitation Supt.: 25% of FTE is shown here; remainder funded in Street System Maintenance and Landfill Operations. CITY OF IOWA CITY FLANDFILLAOPERATIONST _ FY84 ACTUAL FY85 ESTIMATE FY86 BUDGET 138,431 336.137 BEGINNING BALANCE ---------- ---------- 336-157 ---161-930 TOTAL BALANCE 138.431 ------- _--161_930 ,.j LICENSES & PERMITS ---------- 100 390,273 0 605.030 200 619-787 16,100 LANDFILL FEES INTEREST INCOME 17-094 16,467 w MISCELLANEOUS -----1_525 __-----100 621_597 ---------_ 636-554 TOTAL RECEIPTS 609_042 -_ -166,510 -- -173-B3B '- PERSONAL SERVICES -165,937 -13,429 -13,794 -15,712 -176,725 COMMODITIES SERVICES AND CHAR -149,851 -55,099 -169-520 -80-000 -305.000 CAPITAL OUTLAY ,.25,000 -366_.000 -27,000 -`TRANSFERS ----_----6 411_316 -795-824 _--------- -698-275 i TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS -_ ---795-8-- ---6913_-__ ENDING BALANCE336-157 161,930 100,209 aaasasaaaa sa�aaasasa aaa�acaasa EXPENDITURES: PERSONAL SERVICES COMMODITIES SERVICES yOJTLAYHARGES TRANSFERS TOTAL RECEIPTS: LICENSES 111 PERMITS LANDFILL FEES INTEREST INCOME MISCELLANEOUS CITY OF IOWA CITY FY86 OPERATING BUDGET RECEIPTS AND EXPENDITURES SU11MARY 45100 LANDFILL OPERATIONS - FY86 BUDGET -- -- FY84 FY83 DEPT ADMIN FINAL ACTUAL ESTIMATE REQUEST PROPOSAL BUDGET 165,937 166,510 175,838 175,838 175,838 15,42q 13, 794 t3,557 15,712 15.7t2 149,851 169,520 138,801 176,725 176,725 35,099 80,000 125,133 305,000 305,000 ---25,000 366,000 --------- 0 25,000 25,000 4_11,_3_16 ------ 4_3_5_,_3_51 --------- 69_8_,2_7_5 - 698,275 Q _7_9_5,8_24_ i p1 _ i i6 iiQ i FYS6 FY84 ' FYS5 FINAL ACTUAL ESTIMATE BUDGET 150 619,787 590,273 605,030 17,094 16,467 16,467 1,525 -------- 100 --------- 100 62_1,_597 --------- 6_36,_554 _6_0_9,0_42_ Q IJ Q 0 6 9 Q _ CITY OF IOWA CITY FY96 OPERATING BUDGET EXPENDITURES 45100 LANDFILL OPERATIONS � ( PERSONAL SERV10ES3 TRANSFER TOI f FTE BUDGET LAND ACQUISITION RESERVE 25,000 I ^' TOTAL 25,000 i FV85 FY66 { 4 aaaissssi' M•W.III-LANDFILL 2.00 2.00 35,270 M W.III LANDFILL 3.00 3.00 58,156 SA M W LA DFILL 1.00 1.00 24,620 *ASIT LUT o SOLID WASTE .50 ,50 1 ,J63 ., **STEEREET/SANITATION SUPT 025 925 , 34 ;! 0 ERTIMEY MPLOYEEB x,136 INTRA -CITY CHARGEBACKSI f LQWGEVITY f,256 (EI FICA 16,292 VEHICLE OPINATIIONS 76,649 HERS 70936 VEHICLE RELAC [HENT 52,740 HCALTH INSURANCE 10,39yy WORD PROCCISIING 0 LIFE/DISABILITY INSUR �,1,001 ADHINISTRAIYE OVERHEAD 35,645 CBD MAINTENANCE TOTAL sias5 "6.75175,836 ......... auxap si TOTAL 163,034 j sospsFsu CAPITAL OUTLAYS EXCAVATION 305,000 TOTAL __305,000 �.w..i.ai i *Asst. Supt. -Solid Waste: 50% of FTE is shown here; remainder funded in Refuse Collection Operations. **Street/Sanitation Supt.: 25% of FTE is shown here; remainder funded in Street System Maintenance and Refuse Collection Operations. I I I I h. j I CITY OF IOWA CITY FYB6 OPERATING BUDGET LANDFILL, LAND ACOUIS RESERVE FY84 FY85 FY86 ACTUAL ESTIMATE BUDGET BEGINNING BALANCE 132.273 168,336 204,091 TOTAL BALANCE ---------- 132,273 ---------- 168,336 ---------- 204,091 INTEREST INCOME 11,164 10,793 10*733 TRANSFER FROM OPERATIONS--- 25_000 23,000 23,000 - TOTAL RECEIPTS 36,164 --- 37,705 ---------- 33,73 SERVICES AND CHARGES -101 0 0 CAPITAL OUTLAY 0 0 0 - TRANSFERS 0 O 0 TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS ---------- ----- _101 ---------- -------- O - --------- O -------- ENDING BALANCE -1613,336 204,091 239,846 -' aoaaaasaaa sasxsaaasa aaaaxaxxxa i — i I I J CITY OF IOWA CITY FY86 OPERATING BUDGET AIRPORT OPERATIONS FY84 FY85 FY86 ACTUAL ESTIMATE BUDGET BEGINNING BALANCE 5,000 29,523 0 ---------- TOTAL BALANCE 3,000 ---- 29,523 ------ O ---------- STATE GRANTS ---------- 6530 O 0 FEDERAL GRANTS INTEREST INCOME 1.615 1,000 46,104 18000 74,104 BUILDING RENTALS 43,19 6 0 61000 014,000 SALE OF VEHICLES FARM RECEIPTS 13,500 13,500 2,682 FLOWAGE FEE 2,707 109,186 2.682 72,590 99,656 PROPERTY TAX MISCELLANEOUS 8,701 2, 018 ---------- 500 TOTAL RECEIPTS ---------- O58 143_894 --- ---191_442 PERSONAL SERVICES _-_IBO_ -33,265 -23,907 -36,607 -33,210 -39,577 -30,780 C014MODITIES SERVICES AND CHARGES -76,411 -64,100 -79,785 -3,000 CAPITAL OUTLAY -21,952 0 -19,500 20_000 38_000 TRANSFERS _-_ _-_ TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS --_155_535 _-_173_417 _ _191_442 ENDING BALANCE 29,523 0 0 aaaauaaaaa saaaaa...= aaaaaaoaaa i u CITY OF IOWA CITY h FY86 OPERATING BUDGET RECEIPTS AND EXPENDITURES SUMMARY 46100 AIRPORT OPERATIONS V, EXPENDITURES: W ---------- FY86 BUDGET ---------- FY84 FY83 DEPT ADMIN FII4AL „ ACTUAL ESTIMATE REQUEST PROPOSAL BUDGET PERSONAL SERVICES 33,269 36.607 39,877 39,877 39,877 C014MODITIES 23,907 33, 210 3t,370 30,780 30,780 SERVICES AND CHARGES 76,411 64,100 '80,312 79,783 79,783 CAPITAL OUTLAY 21,932 19,300 38,000 31000 3,000 TRANSFERS 0 20,000 --------- 0 --------- 38,000 --------- 38,000 --------- TOTAL --------- 139,333 173,417 209.739 1911442 191,442 ¢¢ccxsams oammcaama msoscammm mmmmammma c cac:em¢ { RECEIPTS: FY86 FY84' FYS9 FINAL ACTUAL ESTIMATE BUDGET w STATE GRANTS 633 O 0 INTEREST INCOME 1,613 11000 11000 BUILDING RENTALS 43,196 46,104 74,104 SALE OF VEHICLES 0 6,000 0 FARM RECEIPTS 14,000 13,900 13.300 ,..; FLO14AGE FEE 2,707 2,682 2,682 PROPERTY TAX 109,186 72,390 99.636 MISCELLANEOUS 8,70t 2,0113 300 --------- 180,038 143,894 291,442 aeaca¢�sa meax¢a¢aa ¢caacasas , M u CITY OF IOWA CITY FYB6 EXPENDITURESDGET 46100 AIRPORT OPERATIONS PERSONAL SERVICE58 TRANSFER TO$ FTE BUDGET ABATED GO BONDS 38,000 3333 . ........0 TOTAL 38,000 FYBS... FYS6 4 ==a=amaam AIRPORT MANAGER 1,00 .1,00 2±r200 2,406 1,236 1,915 2 1 INTRACITY CHARGEBACKSI .......... ...39.87. 4,500 1.00 1.00 39,877 VEHICLE OPE�tACEN9N asses FimOm psmssssss VEHICLE REP ACEM�NT 11'400 MORDppPROCEbbING CODIMAINTENANCOVERHEAD 00 99.8838.8 TOTAL 16,042 ==FORFmmm FFOMGEVITY EMPLOYEES IPERS HEALTH INSURANCE LIFE/DISABILITY INSUR TOTAL 7 I i I � t J J CAPITAL OUTLAV3 ROOF REPAIR 3,000 TOTAL 37 000 ==F=7=atm CITY OF IOWA CITY Ll FY86 OPERATING BUDGET AIRPORT, CAPITAL IMPR RES Ll - FY04 FY80 ~1 FY86 ACTUAL ESTIMATE BUDGET BEGINNING BALANCE 113,828 122,940 130,040 TOTAL BALANCE 113,828 ---------- 122,940 130,040 STATE GRANTS ---------- 0 0 ---------- 0 _ INTEREST INCOME -----9_112 12,600 13,893 _ TOTAL RECEIPTS 9,112 12,600 13,893 SERVICES AND CHARGES 0 0 0 TRANSFERS 0 0 0 - TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS 0 0 0 _. ENDING BALANCE 122,940 139,040 149,433 aaa�aaavaa avmasaavav aaaaaaavva -' u i- CITY OF IOWA CITY FYTRANSITAOPERATIONST FY84 FY85 FY86 ACTUAL ESTIMATE BUDGET BEGINNING BALANCE-- 24_798 — 90=199 TOTAL BALANCE 24,798 90, 199 — --____---_—__ 0 CHARGES FOR SERVICES LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES 785,341 15.327 797,350 30,500 996.688 22.832 STATE 229,320 127,330 234, 597 70,552 123,191 FEDER107.569 ALRAN.US INTEREST INCOME 13.138 281,869 2,000 240,451 0 67.072 FEDERAL REVENUE SHARING PROPERTY' TAX 293, 513 354#653 446,573 a E TRANSIT LEVY 3,602 1,000 345=354 1.000 « MISCELLANEOUS —_-151100 -- jt TOTAL RECEIPTS ---133,60 —1,947_872 2_073,262 J PERSONAL SERVICES —1,941_700 —1,024,365 —7,936 —1,096.045 —8,983 —1,154,640 —17,080 COMMODITIES SERVICES AND CHARGES —704.429 —799,183 —849,742 —1,800 CAPITAL OUTLAY TRANSFERS —278 —139,291 —10,145 —123,715 _— _50_000 TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS _1_B76_299 _2_038_071 _2_073.262 ENDING BALANCE 90,199 0 0 vsanaaaana nmamamxnam nanaamnmva I J i CITY OF IOWA CITY FY86 OPERATING BUDGET RECEIPTS 4AND TRANSIT MARY OPERATIONS 7100 EXPENDITURES: PERSONAL SERVICES COMMODITIES SERVICES AND CHARGES TRANSFERSUTLAY TOTAL RECEIPTS: CHARGES FOR SERVICES LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL AGENC STATE GRANTS FEDERAL GRANTS INTEREST INCOME FEDERALREVENUE SHARING PROPERTY TAX TRANSIT LEVY MISCELLANEOUS -- FY86 BUDGET --- -- -- FY84 ACTUAL FY85 ESTIMATE DEPT REQUEST AD14IN PROPOSAL FINAL BUDGET 1. 024, 365 1,096,045 1, 156. 840 1,154,640 1,154,640 7, 936 704, 429 8,983 799,183 23,104 783,141 17,205 849.742 17,080 849,742 278 10,143 4,680 0 11800 30,000 11800 50,000 13_9, 291 123,715 293,313 334,653 446.573 1.876,299 2,038,071 1,967,763 2,073.387 2,073,262 sacvovsys sysasccss a�sasasea msavaasma: sccccoves FY86 FY84 ' FY85 FINAL ACTUAL ESTIMATE BUDGET 785,341 797,350 996,688 15,327 30,500 22,832 229,320 127,330 70,552 187,369 234,397 123,191 l31138 2,000 0 281,869 240.451 67.072 293,313 334,653 446.573 132,021 139,991 345.354 302 11000 --------- ---- --------- t,941,700 --------- t,947,872 2,073,262 sacccacas mmscscsms easccccvs i i CITY OF IOWA CITY j VY86 OPERATING BUDGET 47100 EXPEND TUNES THANSIT OPERATIONS — TRANSFER TO: PERSONAL SEHVICESt FTE BUDGET THANSIT SYSTEM REPLACEMENT 50,000 TOTAL .. 50,000 j FV85 FV66 { cc=cc�osa MASS TRANSIT OPERATOR M W•11 - TRANSIT 2i.00 2IND { 80678 5 SA.'DRIVER 1;00 •00 g3.8 A•N• OPERATIONS BUPR• 1;00,00 1B:Y0B P M OPERATIONS SUPR• T;A�181T MANAGER 1 (PT) 2:25 0 0 333 ,25 3�:903 INTRAPCITY CHARGEBACKS( M'W I-TRANSIT ca CLERK TRANSIT (PTI •75 (PT 17.25 •75 r 41 17.25 2 ;,300 VEHICLE OPEp TIONS 679x76 2,4 2 MASS TRANSIT OPETATOS TEyMPORARY EMPLOYEES 39,000 VEHIC�E REP CEMENT WORD PROCESSING' 2,200 6VNG6�IVY 5x986 ADMINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD 0 699.407 CBD MAINTENANCE FICA IPENg HEALTH INSURANCE LIFE/DISABILITY INSUR 52�199 6,366 TOTAL 66{x346 cc684,349 ameampax .... 48.25 ..... .....•... 48.25 1x15{.640 TOTAL cocas asaca scc==acaa CAPITAL OUTLAY1 1 MOBILE RADIO 1,800 j TOTAL 1x800 xc=ccs=so I -1 I I I i BEGINNING BALANCE TOTAL BALANCE INTEREST INCOME ICELES OPERATIONS TOTAL RECEIPTS TRANSFERS TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS ENDING BALANCE CITY OF IOWA CITY FY86 OPERATING BUDGET TRANSIT REPLACEMENT RES FY84 FY83 FY86 ACTUAL ESTIMATE BUDGET 365,138 187, 328 46,821 ----46,821 ---365-1-- 363.138 ---187732- 187,328 46.821 33333333-- 13,681 33333333-- 9, 000 31000 139,290 713 0 ----80.0000 --- 0325972 ---123= 128, 715 55,000 --3333---- ---------- -330,782 3333-3333- -269,222 - 0 3333------ 33333333-- -330,782 33333333-- --------- -269, 222 ---------- 0 ����------ t87,328 46,821 101.821 vaocaavvvs cvovvvvvva vavvccaavv CITY OF IOWA CITY FY66 DEBTASERVIBUDGET FY84 ACTUAL FY87 ESTIMATE FY86 BUDGET BEGINNING BALANCE 600.278 329.673 _ 221.430 TOTAL BALANCE 600,278 ---329_673 -- 221,430 PROPERTY TAX 1.373.276 116.6790 1.626.937 70.0000 1.672.147 47.0000 INTEREST INCOME TRANSFER FROM ENTERPRISE FUND 498.200 779,020 MISCELLANEOUS -- ---727-3680 TOTAL RECEIPTS 2_237_977 2_442_713 SERVICES AND CHARGES CAPITAL OUTLAY _1_990.237 -7 -2.060.8130 -110.000 -2.474.2000 0 -2.787.720 TRANSFERS TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS ---------_--------- _2_060_820 _2_764_200 _2_787_727 ENDING BALANCE 729,673 221.430 76.418 nasadas�an nan�asesaa aasseanana CITY OF IOWA CITY FY86 OPERATING BUDGET DEBT SERVICE FUND SUM14ARY OF EXPENDITURES *These bond issues are abated by revenue funds. #This is a preliminary estimate for use in preparing the FY86 Operating Budget. DATE OF OUTSTANDING DUE FY86 GENERAL OBLIGATION ISSUE ANO WT ISSUED 07/01/85 PRINCIPAL INTEREST Streets Improvements 06/77 3,015,000 1,300,000 325,000 56,225 Street Improvements 8 *Sewer Construction 09/78 2,250,000 1,200,000 300,000 57,000 Street Improvements 8 *Sewer Construction 05/79 5,500,000 3,500,000 500,000 184,000 Street Improvements 8 *Sewer Construction 09/80 2,570,000 2,000,000 200,000 129,200 Multi -Purpose 12/82 2,700,000 2,500,000 250,000 201,600 #Multl-Purpose Spring 85 5,000,000 5,000,000 -0- 384,500 TOTAL 15,500,000 1,575,000 1,012,525 *These bond issues are abated by revenue funds. #This is a preliminary estimate for use in preparing the FY86 Operating Budget. n CITY OF IOWA CITY FY86 OPERATING BUDGET TRUST & AGENCY, PENS & RETIRE FY84 ACTUAL FY80 ESTIMATE FY86 BUDGET 72, 171 t7#099 81189 BEGINNING BALANCE ---------- ---------- ---------- 8,189 TOTAL BALANCE 72,171 17,099 ---------- ---------- PROPERTY TAX ______ 060,676 81, 904 673,802 87, 007 664:607 92,810 UNIVERSITY FIRE CONTRACT 6 52 6,000 6,0000 INTEREST INCOME 0 MISCELLANEOUS --- ----- 649,817 ---------- ---------- 763,467 TOTAL RECEIPTS --- —_-767_409 -- 0 PERSONAL SERVICER SERVICES AND CHARGEE —677 —42,141 —661,871 0 —60,000 —716,319 —60,000 —711,606 TRANSFERS ---------- ------ ---- —776,319 ---------- 771_606 TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS — _704_889 —_ ENDING BALANCE 17,099 8,189 0 aamavaccav mmmmammmam mmvvaaaaao i CITY OF IOWA CITY %A FY86 OPERATING BUDGET L', '— TRUST & AGENCY FUND SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES ACTUAL ESTIMATE BUDGET EMPLOYEE BENEFIT COSTS BUDGETED IN FY84 FY85 FY86 TRUST & AGENCY FUND : $ $ _ 662,748 716,319 711,656 -.. Police & Fire Pension and Retirement 29,700 35,000 35,000 Worker's Compensation 12,440 20,000 20,000 — Unemployment Insurance -0_ 5,000 5,000 Police & Fire Retirement System Expense 776.319 771,656 TOTAL TRUST & AGENCY FUND BENEFITS 704.888 ENPLOYEE BENEFIT COSTS BUDGETED IN GENERAL FUND ,-; 290,223 302,376 324,633 FICA 183,363 198,814 208,438 IPERS351910 HEALTH, LIFE.& DISABILITY INSURANCE , 386.141 504.216 TOTAL GENERAL FUND BENEFITS 825,496 887.331 1,037,287 a.i FXpLOYER'S CONTRIBUTION RATE ei 23.209% '.21,019% 18.915% Police Retirement 31.862% 32.088% 30.895 Fire Retirement 6,700% 7 000% 7,100% ,. FICA 5.750% 5.750% 5.750% IPERS Police & Fire Retirement - Contribution rate is set by the annual _. actuary study done on the petlrement from systema. 7.0% to 7.05%, and the maximum _ FICA - 01/01/85 the rete changed $37,800 rat thefrome csalary hangesrose fromfrom 7.05% to �15% end the maximum alary/ri es6 _ $39,500 to $42,000. IPERS - The rate remains at 5.75%; 01/01/86 the maximum salary goes up from $21,000 to $22,000. CITY OF IOWA CITY FY86 ROADAUSE TAX FY84 FY85 FY86 ACTUAL ESTIMATE BUDGET BEGINNING BALANCE200_471 293,143 ----92_909 TOTAL BALANCE -- - -293,143 ---- 92,909 ROAD USE TAX _ _200_471 1,373,456 1, 641, 910 5,000-- 1,641,510 51000 INTEREST INCOME 15,640 ---------- ---- TOTAL RECEIPTS _096 -1_646_510 -1,646_510 SERVICES AND CHARGES TRANSFERS -1_589-------- 0 _1,496_424 0 _1,646,744 0 _1_739_419 TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS _1,496_424 _1.846_744 _1,739,419 ENDING BALANCE 293,143 92,909 0 naaanvvona vavvvvvvvv nanavvvcvv CITY OF IOWA CITY FY86 OPERATING BUDGET ROAD USE TAX ACTUAL ESTIMATE BUDGET FY84 FY85 FY86 i BEGINNING BALANCE 200,471 293,143 92,909 RECEIPTS: Road Use Tax 1,573,456 1,641,510 1,641,510 Interest Income 15,640 5,000 5,000 TOTAL RECEIPTS 1,589,096 1,646,510 1,646,510 EXPENDITURES: Operating Expenditures: Traffic Engineering 372,074 515,242 508,190 Street System Maintenance 1,124,350 1,331,502,. 1,208,229 TOTAL OPERATING 1,496,424 1,846,744 1,716,419 Capital Improvements: Bradford/let Avenue Signals -- -- 19,000 Foster Road -Extra Width Paving -- -- 4,000 TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS -- -- 23,000 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 1,496,424 1,846,744 1,739,419 ENDING BALANCE 293,143 92,909 -- CITY OF IOWA CITY FY86 OPERATING BUDGET FEDERAL REVENUE SHARING FY84 FV83 FY86 ACTUAL ESTIMATE BUDGET BEGINNING BALANCE 81,313 243,241 -20,086 TOTAL BALANCE 81,313 243,241 _20_086 FEDERAL REVENUE SHARING --- --- 383,142 372,267 - - 572,267 INTEREST INCOME 13,926 16,000 16,000 TOTAL RECEIPTS 399,068 388,267 388,267 SERVICES AND CHARGES -443 -300 -300 TRANSFERS -436,699 -- ------ -831,094 -567,681 TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS ---------- -437,142 -831,594 ---------- -368,181 ENDING BALANCE 243,241 -20,096 0 saaaaaaaaa aa=c��v��a eeaaaa��oa CITY OF IOWA CITY FY86 OPERATING BUDGET FEDERAL REVENUE SHARING BEGINNING BALANCE RECEIPTS: Federal Revenue Sharing Interest Income TOTAL RECEIPTS EXPENDITURES: Operating Expenditures: Audit Expenses Transfers: Aid to Agencies Micro -Computers Purchase Patrol Vehicles 8 Equipment Transit Subsidy TOTAL OPERATING Capital Improvements: Kirkwood Circle Improvements Shamrock/Arbor Storm Sewer Undesignated Projects TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS TOTAL EXPENDITURES ENDING BALANCE ACTUAL ESTIMATE BUDGET FY84 FY85 FY86 166,943 173,891 -- 81,315 243,241 (20,086 583,142 572,267 572,267 15,926 16,000 16,000 599,068 588,267 588,267 - 443 500 500 154,830 166,943 173,891 -- 50,0001 -- -- 158,100 -- 281,869 240,451 67,072 437,142 615,994 241,463 _ -- 27,600 -- -- 208,000 -- _ 326,718 235,600 326,718 - 437,142 851,594 568,181 - 243,241 (20,086 -- BEGINNING BALANCE TOTAL BALANCE FEDERAL GRANTS SALE OF REAL ESTATE GENERAL FUND - MISC MISCELLANEOUS TOTAL RECEIPTS PERSONAL SERVICES COMMODITIES SERVICES AND CHARGES TRANSFERBUTLAY TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS ENDING BALANCE CITY OF IOWA CITY FY86 OPERATING BUDGET CDBO, METRO ENTITLEMENT FY04 ACTUAL ESTIMATE BUDGET -178,239 -67,460 -----_ 706 ---178,239 ----67,460 -706 ---732,706 --- 784,663813.870 --_ 0 0 139,276 0 0 0 0 8,818 0 ---932_,_776 ---81_3,870 -_ 732_,7_06 -144, 038 -124, 664 -1,263 -127,551 -1,333 A936 -3 961 -306, 841 -315,5420 :127,4626 296,273 0497.3610 -- 819,977 -_ _ 731_116 - - _732_000 -63,460 r,mwmaam. -706 a.eosar.m. 0 .,=wwwww- METRO-ENTITLF14ENT: General Supervision Community Development Lower Ralston Creek North Branch Improvements Housing Program Administration Housing Rehab g Weatherization Loans Housing Code Enforcement Land Acquisition -Housing Projects Congregate Housing Systems Unlimited Property Management A Disposition Creekside NSA Storm Drain North Dodge Street Sidewalks Hillcrest Family Services Nelson Adult Center Renovation Miller/Orchard Park Handicapped Center Accessibility Guide Mark IV/Willow Creek - Van Accessibility to Neighborhood Center Creekside Alley Repair Iowa Youth Corps Shelter Kirkwood Circle Drainage Shared Housing Human Services Planning Emergency Housing Creekside Sidewalks Facility for MECCA Hendicare Van City Park Accessibility N. Market Square Handicap Play Area Longfellow Playground Equipment Goodwill Industries Renovation Contingency TOTAL METRO -ENTITLEMENT CITY OF IOWA CITY FY86 OPERATING BUDGET COMMUNITY DEVEIAPHW BLACK GRANT SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES ACTUAL FY84 f 117,660 16,821 482 38,068 34,204 104,433 9,152 500 5,038 100,002 7 157,300 23,581 93,500 2,450 101,339 15,440 819.977 ESTIMATE FY85 i 106,260 125,000 14,520 48,000 220,000 18,700 61,580 40,100 FYI 2,500 12,318 60,000 15,000 5,000 19,511 2.067 751.116 BUDGET FY86 s 108,466 182,500 60,000 3,500 15,000 23,200 50,000 13,350 35,000 3,000 2,400 205,335 30.249 732.000 CITY OF I014A CITY FY86 OPERATING BUDGET RECEIPTS AND EXPENDITURES SUMMARY 86000 CDBG, 14ETRO ENTITLEMENT j EXPENDITURES: ---------- FY86 BUDGET---------- FY84 FY85 DEPT ADMIN FINAL ACTUAL ESTIMATE REQUEST PROPOSAL BUDGET PERSONAL SERVICES 144,038 124,664 121,331 127.991 121,531 C014110DETIEB 7 961 1,265 1, 333 1, 841 1, 333 I _ SERVICES AND CHARGES 397,961 127,361 16,874 306,841 306,841 CAPITAL OUTLAY 313,542 497,5610 993,0110 302,316 296,2750 { TRANSFERS -----300 ------------------ --------- -------- TOTAL 819,977 791,116 738,769 737,841 732,000 f I n RECEIPTS: FY86 FY84 FY83 FINAL iACTUAL ESTIMATE BUDGET FEDERAL GRANTS -784,663- 813=B70 - 0 732,7066 ,8 GENERAL FUND - MISC t39,275 0 MISCELLANEOUS 8 932,796 815,870 732,706 ==sswxos ssaac-eva vsvccsaas I i - ^I ' v1 I � � r r TOTAL TRANSFER Tot A 5 C}ATE PLANNER CITY OF IOWA CITY FICAEYITY HEXITH FY86 HH WEHIC E BEPLACCMENT 1!190 EXPENDITURESDCET 686 WORD PROCESdING 06000 CDBG, METRO ENTITLEMENT PERSONAL SERVICESS TOTAL FTE BUDGET NONE 0 assay Maass ssaa;.acss FY65 FY86 6 REHABILITATION OFFICER 1.00 .00 25,376 ***ASSOCIATE PLANNER ,75 ,75 18,476 **ADMIN SggC, PPD .25 25 ::as 5!1183 CDBG COORDINATOR 1.y00 31,388 *PAPAD. DIRECTOR pp IPTi '76 X75 17!625 TOTAL TRANSFER Tot A 5 C}ATE PLANNER r INTRA -CITY CHARGESACKS3 FICAEYITY HEXITH 7,505 7156{ HH WEHIC E BEPLACCMENT 1!190 INSURANCE LIFE/DISABILITY INSUR 686 WORD PROCESdING 5,56a ApMINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD TOTAL 3.95 3.95 127,551 CBD MAIN TEN NCE 0 assay Maass ssaa;.acss ......... TOTAL 6,761 aMaassasa *PPD Director: **Admin. Sec. -PPD: ***Associate Planner: CAPITAL OUTI,AYI BUILDING IAMAPROppVEMMAENTS 144,000 CCCITYRPKTACCRSSIBLE RESTROOM 35,000 1WEXECUTIVEXCHAAAIRKB 43,008 MILLER/0 CHARD PARK 60,000 CONTINGENCY 28,455 LONGFELLOW PLAY EQUIPMENT 2,400 TOTAL 296,275 MaMaaaaas 20% of FTE is shown here; remainder funded in PPD Admin. and JCCOG Admin. — 25% of FTE is shown here; remainder funded in PPD Admin., JCCOG Admin. — and JCCOG Rural Planning. 75% of FTE is shown here; remainder funded in Urban Planning 8 Development. CITY OF I014A CITY FY86 OPERATING BUDGET I FY84 FY80 FY86 - ACTUAL ESTIMATE BUDGET J BEGINNING BALANCE--- 43_687 - -------- 04,991 ---- TOTAL BALANCE 43_687 ----00_890 --- 04_991 --- LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES 47,444 30,706 49,241 27,0000 03,689 27,0000 i FEDERAL GRANTS INTEREST INCOME PROPERTY TAX 70,082 73,100 77,0990 MISCELLANEOUS ----- TOTAL RECEIPTS 1_49_,8_99 ---100,003 10__8,78_8 PERSONAL SERVICES -107,048 -799 -116,697 -1, t60 -123,820 -1.010 C011MODITIES SERVICES AND CHARGES -29_6911 -33,0400 -37,006 CAPITAL OUTLAY 0 0 0 TRANSFERS _________0 ____-____- TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS 71377696 _100_ 902 -- _161_886 -- J ENDING BALANCE 000890 04,991 01,893 -, .......... .......... .......... EXPEIIDITURES: PERSONAL SERVICES C01910DITIES SERVICES AND CHARGES CAPITAL OUTLAY TRANSFERS TOTAL RECEIPTS: CITY OF IOWA CITY FY86 OPERATING BUDGET RECEIPTS AND EXPENDITURES SUMMARY 55110 JCCOG ADMINISTRATION LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL AGENC FEDERAL GRANTS INTEREST INCOME PROPERTY TAX MISCELLANEOUS j NOTE: This 1s a swimary of all JCCOG (5511.0, 5512.0, 5513.0 and 5515.0) receipts. -- FY86 BUDGET ---------•- FY84 FY85 DEPT ADMIN F114AL ACTUAL ESTIMATE REQUEST PROPOSAL BUDGET 16,353 I8, 985 18,827 18,827 L8, E27 107 275 273 273 275 12,3199 13,887 14,480 14,4866 14,486 158 0 0 0 0 --------- --------29,337 G ----- -- 29,337 -----___0 33,147 --------- 33,586 33,598 33, *SS acaoacoc. aaaaacaca saaaaaaaa auaaasca ......... j NOTE: This 1s a swimary of all JCCOG (5511.0, 5512.0, 5513.0 and 5515.0) receipts. FYB6 FY84 FY85 FINAL ACTUAL ESTIMATE BUDGET 47,444 49,241 33,689 30,739 27,500 27,5000 70,348 73,100 77,590 149,899 150.003 158,788 oa_a=coca aaoaoc.sa aa-cacuma j NOTE: This 1s a swimary of all JCCOG (5511.0, 5512.0, 5513.0 and 5515.0) receipts. IOTA *Technical Assistant PPD: I I **PPD Director: I ***Admin. Sec. -PPD: ****Sr. Clerk/Typist-PPD: i 1^ I NONE TOTAL TRANSFER TO; 0 zzzcccFa0 IMTR/A�-TTICITNNY CHARGEBACMSY VE 6 RLPkI;CLNLNT 0 YE IC EE n 00 WORDROCKS 3,0 CRU M14114 EM N E TOTAL 343 Czaazaaan CAPITAL OUTLAYI NONE 0 TOTAL 0 azazzczcz 20% of FTE is shown here; remainder funded in Urban Planning b Development and JCCOG Rural Planning. 20% of FTE is shown here; remainder funded in PPD Admin. and CDBG Metro Entitlement. 10% of FTE is shown here; remainder funded in PPD Admin., JCCOG Rural Planning and CDBG Metro Entitlement. 8% of HE is shown here; remainder funded in PPD Admin. I1 CITY OF IOWA CITY FYBb EXPENDITURESUGET 55110 JCCOG ADMINISTRATION PERSONAL SERVICES1 FTI: BUDGET FYBS FYWb PPD p0 .20 .219 2Br07j3 ;10 .10 .09 ;0W 1:20 `NINUTES (PT) 1,197 1,10 ;OR 2S ... ..........25 lar927 a�ap� .pili aaiitisaa *Technical Assistant PPD: I I **PPD Director: I ***Admin. Sec. -PPD: ****Sr. Clerk/Typist-PPD: i 1^ I NONE TOTAL TRANSFER TO; 0 zzzcccFa0 IMTR/A�-TTICITNNY CHARGEBACMSY VE 6 RLPkI;CLNLNT 0 YE IC EE n 00 WORDROCKS 3,0 CRU M14114 EM N E TOTAL 343 Czaazaaan CAPITAL OUTLAYI NONE 0 TOTAL 0 azazzczcz 20% of FTE is shown here; remainder funded in Urban Planning b Development and JCCOG Rural Planning. 20% of FTE is shown here; remainder funded in PPD Admin. and CDBG Metro Entitlement. 10% of FTE is shown here; remainder funded in PPD Admin., JCCOG Rural Planning and CDBG Metro Entitlement. 8% of HE is shown here; remainder funded in PPD Admin. I1 CITY OF I014A CITY F1'86 OPERATING BUDGET - I RECEIPTS AND EXPENDITURES SUMMARY :55130 JCCOG, TRANSPORTATION PLANNING f I EXPENDITURES: -- FY66 BUDGET ---------- ! FY84 FY85 DEPT ADMIN FINAL I ACTUAL ESTIHATE REQUEST PROPOSAL BUDGET ... I ' PERSONAL SERVICES 36,724 60,73S 64,971 64,971 64,971 , COMMODITIES SERVICES AND CHARGES 290 240 280 6,:2t3 50906 6,594 283 8,557 283 8,337 CAPITAL OUTLAY--------- 0 _______ 0 __ ___ 0 _______ 0 _____ _0 TOTAL 63,227 66.884 71,830 73,613 73,813 •-• mo�a�maaa a.msasoas a�c�snsmv avavmsama m_os���ss r• 1 w 7 ri i NOTE: Receipts aro included in I 5511.0 JCCOG Administration. � I I ct11TY OF IOWA CITY _ i FV06 OPERATING BUDGET EXPENDITURES 55120 JCCOG, TRANSPORTATION PLANNING PERSONAL SERVICESi TRANSFER 'fUi j J F1'E BUDGET NONE ........0 ... ...... TOTAL FV85 FYSb $ m2mmamasa I ASSOCIATE PLANNER 1.00 1,00 25,737 TRANSPUATATIOL PLANNER 1.00 1,00 20,9650 TEMPOTARY EMP O EES PICAS ITY 7,900 13 • 4i HEALTH INSURANCE�BT4 4 INTRACITY CHAkGEUACBSt LIFE/DISABILITY INSUR _ � VEHH1C;E OPERB IDMS 7t+ 0 .. TOTAL 2.00 Nessa 2.00 66,971 was** ssas*aas* VEHIF E R6EPL EMENT MORD ROCESSI G 2,520 INAINTCMANCC YENHEAD CDD 00 TOTAL 2,86{ mmmmcaa2a CAPITAL OUTLAYt NONE TOTAL 0 ...2==mai CITY OF I014A CITY FY86 OPERATING BUDGET RECEIPTS AND EXPENDITURES SUMMARY 55130 JCCOG, RURAL PLANNING EXPENDITURES: NOTE: Receipts are Included In 5511.0 JCCOG Administration. ---------- FY86 BUDGET ---------- FY84 FY80 DEPT ADMIN FINAL ACTUAL ESTIMATE REQUEST PROPOSAL BUDGET PERSONAL SERVICES 19,393 23,002 23,032 20,282 23,282 COMMODITIES 327 300 370 370 370 SERVICES A140 CHARGES 8,082 9,797 9,923 9,279 9,379 TRANSFERS 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 27,804 33,299 33,323 34,93134,931 ....... ... =.oe.. .....a.s .......No . ....... NOTE: Receipts are Included In 5511.0 JCCOG Administration. CITY OF IOWA CITY FY06 EXPENDITURESDGET 55130 JCCOG, RURAL PLANNING PERSONAL SERVICESI FTE BUDGET NONE FY95 FY06 I * PPD (PT) .SO ;50 1T:O�R �Y =RgMHCIASpEC�LANNEgNi LOMEDRAN EMPLOYEES Y FICA I:45Z MTN 1#77$ INSURANCE L/DISABILITY INSUR 69 TOTAL .90 .90 25,202 pt p.. ppsCi piT,ipi3pZ TRANSFER TOI TOTAL 0 0 i==ip==px INTRA -CITY CHARGEBACKSI VEHICLE OPERATIONS 39¢ w000HCPR CESSINGNENT 2,1000 AR.IHISTRATIVE OVERHEAD 0 CBD MAINTENANCE 0 TOTAL 2,495 • eeo.epeart CAPITAL OUTI.AVI NONE 0 TOTAL _-•----•0 ao=a==pps *Admin. Sec. -PPD: 10% of FTE is shown here; remainder funded in PPD Admin., JCCOG Admin. and CDBG Metro Entitlement. **Technical Assistant PPD: 30% of FTE is shown here; remainder funded in Urban Planning 6 Develop- ment and JCCOG Admin. CITY OF IOWA CITY FY86 OPERATING BUDGET RtCE�3190AJCCOOPHUMANUSERVICEBARY EXPENDITURES: ---------- FY86 BUDGET--------- FY84 F ACTUAL FY35 ESTIMATE DEPT REGUEST ADMIN PROPOSAL FINAL DUDGEI PERSONAL SERVICES 12.37; 13.130 14,s0 t4.740 14.780 C011110DITIES SERVICES AND CHARGES 2.738 3.430 --- 3_632 _-- 4.734 4,734 --------- 13.209 --- 17.372 18.472 19.334 TOTAL a_.13oma _aa19_334 NOTE: Receipts are included in 5511.0 JCCOG Administration. i CITy DF IOWAAG CITY FYBb EXPEN0ITURESDGET 55150 JCCOG HUMAN SERVICES TRANSFER TOi i PERSONAL SERVICESi-- p FTE BUDGET NONE ......- 0 ..... TOTAL =2.92===01 i I FYBS FYBb t J -1 HUMAN SERVICES COORDINATOR (PT) .SO .50 140&64 FICA 700 950 J IPERS' HEALTH INSURANCE LIFE/pISABILITY INSUR ��... ...•• ..••.••.v INTRA -CITY CHARGEBACKS1 TOTAL .50 .50 14 7010 cacsa ccscs sscssisac VEHICLE OPIRATIONS 0 0 VEHICLE RE LACEMENT 10575 WORD PROCESSING ADMINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD J CBD MAINTENANCE ........0 � TOTAL 1.575 =xac==cs■ I - CAPITAL OUTLAYi 0 — NONE ......... 0 _ I I — TOTAL ====c==sa RECEIPTS: HUD Annual Contribution Contract Interest Income Total OPERATING EXPENSES: Administrative Expense Utilities Ordinary Maintenance 6 Operations { General Expense Non -Routine Maintenance Rent to Owners Capital Expenditures Total RECEIPTS OVER EXPENDITURES INTEREST ON OPERATING RESERVE CASH WITHDRAWAL BEGINNING BALANCE (OPERATING RESERVE) ENDING BALANCE (OPERATING RESERVE) CITY OF IOWA CITY ' FY86 OPERATING BUDGET SECTION 8 EXISTING 6513.2 FY84 ACTUAL_ 1,058,960 5,160 1,064,120 117,119 -0- -0- 19,732 -0- 913,564 -0- 1,050,415 13,705 6,591 (286) 99.615 119,625 *FY85 ESTIMATE 1,440,396 5,000 1,445,396 120,312 -0- -0- 19,266 -0- 1,271,513 -0- 1,411,091 34,305 10,750 -0- 119,625 .164 A.68.0 *Based on a budget approved by HUD. This budget will be amended after January 1, 1985, and before April 30, 1985. Amended budget will utilize first six months actual expen- ditures, projected six months expenditures and include an increase of fourteen units. FY86 _BUDGET 1,456,116 5,000 1,461,116 130,700 1,600 -0- 25,160 -0- 1,290,240 6.720 1,454,420 6,696 14,821 -0- 164,680 186,197 „ CITY OF IOWA CITY FY86 OPERATING BUDGET EXPENDITURES 6513.2 SECTION 8 EXISTING PERSONAL SERVICES: TRANSFER TO: FTE BUDGET NONE ----- F FY85 FY86 $ TOTAL0 =====- HOUSING COORDINATOR .80 .80 25,111 HOUSING SPECIALIST 2.40 2.40 52,137 HOUSING MANAGEMENT AID .80 .80 15,704 CLERK/TYPIST - LEASED HOUSING .80 .80 12,841 LONGEVITY FICA IPERS HEALTH INSURANCE LIFE/DISABILITY INSURANCE TOTAL 900 1,511 5,875 8,178 665 4.80 4.80 1281922 INTRA -CITY CHARGEBACKS: NONE __0 TOTAL :==-=0 CAPITAL OUTLAY: 80% OF 1 AUTOMOBILE 62720 TOTAL 62720 NOTE: Permanent full-time salaries are included in Administrative Expenses; employee benefits are included in General Expenses. < w f! i 900 1,511 5,875 8,178 665 4.80 4.80 1281922 INTRA -CITY CHARGEBACKS: NONE __0 TOTAL :==-=0 CAPITAL OUTLAY: 80% OF 1 AUTOMOBILE 62720 TOTAL 62720 NOTE: Permanent full-time salaries are included in Administrative Expenses; employee benefits are included in General Expenses. i CITY OF IOWA CITY LI FY86 OPERATING BUDGETi 1�1 i I PUBLIC HOUSING 6513.9 n FY84 *FY85 FY86 I ACTUAL- $- ESTIMATE �_ -BUDGET_ - $ I OPERATING RECEIPTS: i Dwelling Rental 80,641 85',900 87,725 Interest Income 5,192 1,950 2,760 Other Income (Laundry) 680 500 500 Total 86,513 88,350 90,985 OPERATING EXPENSES: Administrative Expense 22,203 27,090 33,700 Utilities 1,788 4,800 4,800 i Ordinary Maintenance & Operations 10,461 19,160 24,575 k General Expense 11,394 15,410 21,645 Capital Expenditures 5,089 -0- 1,680 Total 50,935 66,460 86,400 ` r RECEIPTS OVER EXPENDITURES 35,578 21,890 4,585 PAYMENTS DUE HUD 20,227 18,506 -0- PROVISION FOR RESERVE 15,351 3,384 4,585 BEGINNING BALANCE (OPERATING RESERVE) 14,495 29,846 33,230 ENDING BALANCE (OPERATING RESERVE) 29,846 33,230 37,815 *Based on a budget approved by HUD in April, 1984. This budget will be amended after January 1, 1985. Reason for budget change is under -estimating maintenance costs and over -estimating rental income. I n CITY OF IOWA CITY FY86 OPERATING BUDGET EXPENDITURES 6513.8 PUBLIC HOUSING PERSONAL SERVICES: FTE BUDGET FY85 FY86 f NONE TRANSFER TO: 0 NOTE: Permanent full-time salaries are included in Administrative Expenses; employee benefits are included in General Expenses. 1 � ■ TOTAL 0 HOUSING MANAGEMENT AID .20 .20 3,926 CLERK/TYPIST - LEASED HOUSING .20 .20 3,210 HOUSING SPECIALIST .60 .60 13,034 HOUSING COORDINATOR .20 .20 6,278 J M.W.I. - PUBLIC HOUSING (PT) .75 .75 11,293 LONGEVITY225 FICA 2,680 IPERS 2,170 HEALTH INSURANCE--- i LIFE/DISABILITY INSURANCE _-- --2,531 116 INTRA -CITY CHARGEBACKS: -: TOTAL 1_95 1_95 451463 NONE _____O i TOTAL 0 i i i CAPITAL OUTLAY: 20% OF 1 AUTOMOBILE _11680 _ TOTAL 11680 NOTE: Permanent full-time salaries are included in Administrative Expenses; employee benefits are included in General Expenses. 1 � ■ CITY OF IOWA CITY `4 FY86 OPERATING BUDGET _ EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE �+1 FY84 FY83 FY86 - ACTUAL ESTIMATE BUDGET BEGINNING BALANCE-- 643,764 -- 609_377 -- 396_891 _ TOTAL BALANCE 643.364 -- 609,577 ---396,891 CHARGES FOR SERVICES -- 1,737.270 33.377 1,602,039 30,000 1,646.732 30,000 - INTEREST INCOME SALE OF PARTS 847 1,000 1.000 GENERAL FUND - MISC 2,470 7,900 0� MISCELLANEOUS ________ _ _ __ ___ ---------- TOTAL RECEIPTS _ 4,127 1,640,979 - -1,677.732 - PERSONAL SERVICES -1,77_ -377,762 -744,121 -377,826 -817,767 -470,367 - -800,307 COMMODITIES SERVICES AND CHARGES •-167.877 -317.901• -140,204 -319,830 -173,773 - -494,200 CAPITAL OUTLAY TRANSFERS -2,451 0 0 TOTAL BALANCE _1_608_112 _1_873_647 _1_938_643 . ENDING BALANCE 609.777 396,891 137,780 aaccaaxs—c xc—vxaxxca cxsssoacaa EXPENDITURES: COMMODITIEBRVICEB SERVICES AND CHARGES CAPITAL OUTLAY TRANSFERS TOTAL RECEIPTS: CHARGES FOR SERVICES INTEREST INCOME SALE OF PARTS GENERAL FUND — MISC MISCELLANEOUS CITY OF IOIJA CITY FY86 OPERATING BUDGET RECEIPTS AND EXPENDITURES SUMMARY 62200 EGUIPMENT MAINTENANCE ---------- FY66 BUDGET ---------- FY84 FY85 DEPT ADMIN FINAL ACTUAL ESTIIIATE REQUEST PROPOSAL BUDGET 377,762 375,826 422,397 470,365 470,365 744,121 817,765 800,305 800,305 800,305 165,877 140,204 145,221 173,773 173,773 317,901 519,850 494,200 494,200 494,200 2,431 0 0 0 —17-60-87-1-1-2 112 1, 853, 645 t, 862, 123 1, 938, 643 1, 938, 643 aaaaaaysa amxmvavaa as -ansa as alas--a-a a-as-aaxx FY86 FY84 FY85 FINAL ACTUAL' ESTIMATE BUDGET 1,537,270 1,602,059 1,646,532 33,557 30,000 30,000 847 11000 11000 2,431 0 0 • 0 7o900 0 --------- 1,574,123 1. 640, 959 1,677,332 caaamaasa vaaeaavaa aaasaaama .M.I�PARR Y iii YEINSUR TOTAL 2,500 17,750 VEHICLE REPLACEMENT WORD PROCESSING CITY OF IOWA CITY FY86 OPERATING BUDGET _ EN TMAINTENANCE 62200 EQUIPMENT CBD M/�INTENl1NUEOVERHE PERSONAL SERVICES$ TRANSFER TO$ FTE BUDGET NONE 0 -_-�--� TOTAL 0 4�911 FY85 FY86 6 K 17163830 w =ammasass 1.00 1;00 C4E�RK 500 ¢100 101:391 2;00 E X043 00 00 9 12.00 1;00 4:00 541944 INTRACITY CHARGEBACKS$ NTENDENT 1.00 IND 31309 VEHICLE OPERAT0N8 7.532 YEINSUR TOTAL 2,500 17,750 VEHICLE REPLACEMENT WORD PROCESSING 160 04 550 3,050 ADNINIISTRAlIIY AD 0 .770579 CBD M/�INTENl1NUEOVERHE 0 27487 -_-�--� 4�911 TOTAL =ammasass 15.00 17,00 470,365 •TRC= i=ii■ ■masmx==i 1 7 1 2 3 1 6 1 1 0 CAPITAL OUTLAY$ ER CK S TOTAL ILES 4,700 20,`600 1a 400 3 11:500 17,400 40,100 33,6500 19'600 ~ 16,000 43,800 9,400 39,600 60,200 1 ,000 47,600 59,000 ` 494,200 c=auotR J CITY OF TOIVA CITY FY86 OPERATING BUDGET FINANCIAL SIM WRY_- 1985 ...................................................................................... A YCL PROPA !i 0 N 101Y LY/ }}O** 1, 0111,U11110 T56N LY/ p} 1, pIf• I!LOliE ...� •c. .. REFEjiT/ /ECDills M; ;81=11iNT/ 1 fY .............. ..... ...... ... ..........................................•..........•. 69095A6 ROAD "EST SERVICE PAPKINC OPERATIONS PARKING, RESERVES POLLOWSON CONTROL OPERATIONS POLL COMTNOL, 19591V96 RATER OPERATIONS VAIEN.RESESVES SEFSEE COLLECTION OPERATIONS LANDFILL OPERATIONS LANDFILL, RESERVES A18PUT OPERATIONS AIRPORT, RESERVES TRAMAIT OPERATIONS TRAMAIT, 9969MA TRUST L AGENCY, PENS L RETIRE 0CC0G CSEG ROAD USE TAE FEDERAL REVENUE SNARING GRAND TOTAL 1,070,151 7,700,177 1,001,000 2,606,600 12,762,03/ 11,920,001 079,707 17,791,791 1,706,411 079,677 1,026,915 70,000 119,032 9,118,057 2,566,200 0 2,900,200 111,010 541,075 0 1,595.297 0,000 1,592,163 761,610 909,507 1,757,001 677,100 799,917 0 0 109,595 005,505 185,729 0 975,725 769,005 791,155 0 1,461,590 0 910510699 919,595 955,515 1,495,091 190,035 961,177 0 159,555 171,590 2090599 157,790 5 107,790 9,591,502 61,200 0 1,910,107 0 20910,107 1,009,097 290,517 1,979,110 90,251 900,102 0 55,910 2510957 !07,057 219,901 771,715 100,225 709,199 0 0 010,699 96,195 910,550 $02,105 0 502,10S 90772 170,167 0 621,597 0 511,907 029,030 755,490 799,520 161.050 160,770 0 10,799 25,000 79,759 0 0 0 100,091 29,927 0 71,101 75.990 107.110 197,417 10.500 171,417 0 112,900 0 11.500 0 12,500 0 0 0 119,900 90,199 0 1,191.777 111,999 1,917,571 1,910,710 111,719 21075,071 0 157,725 0 1.060 127.711 125.719 0 269.212 209,222 00.522 17,099 677,152 92.157 0 757,009 10,000 716,719 771,119 5,109 95,090 0 71.69 77,162 165.507 119.903 0 150,903 ' 50.901 •69,060 0 519,570 0 519.070 791,110 0 151,116 •706 207,101 0 1,666,510 0 1.566.910 0 1,900.706 1,500,100 91.909 267,701 0 515,161 0 919.267 900 091,090 191.590 •20,000 iiiiiii:::i:iii:ii .... - 6:6666666 66661666 i.1A."hiii iiiiiiiiii 6666:6666 6666666666 666666666 I 1 GEVERAIL FUND DEBT SERVICE PASSING OPERATIONS PASSING. 1EEERVE9 POLLUTION CONTROL OPENATIONS POLL 000890L, SE0ERV92 NATER OrESAT10Ns NATER,2Es89VE5 011756 COLLECTION OPERATIONS LAVDIILL OPERATIONS &morILL, 056EAVIG AIRPORT OPERATIONS AIRPORT, 1E5ERVE9 TRANSIT 0PE9ATIONS TRANSIT, 19SERYES TRUST & AGENCY, TEN& & RETIRE JCCOG CDio ROAD USE TAE /EOERAL REVENUE SNARING GRAND TOTAL CITY OF I019A CITY _ FY86 OPERATING BUDGET FINANCIAL SUMdARY - 1986 1,796,011 7,957,206 7.200.720 2.007.071 11.211.006 12.611.000 1,070,107 12,587.167 1,022,600 221.010 1.972406 05,000 525,166 2.062,611 2007,620 0 20607,620 76.016 077.109 0 1,779,076 4,000 1,161.076 610.251 612,766 1.662,020 597,662 769,000 0 0 701,766 701,766 666,000 6 666,000 760,011 150,625 0 11069.000 0 1,090,001 961,156 162,016 1,626,792 107,276 1891.992 0 802.685 117.921 206,606 1091611 8 166.617 1.211,069 56,201 0 21070.197 0 2,079,167 1,720,077 267,970 1.016,966 106,012 749.166 0 41,010 206.826 291,119 1101606 89,s00 926,089 922,696 2,772 0 592.691 0 562,891 562.779 0 562.779 22,660 101.920 0 616,550 9 676,596 671,276 25,660 690,276 106,209 200,091 0 10,766 75.000 25.755 0 0 0 211,606 0 0 91.706 09,056 191,442 151,007 10,406 191,002 0 116.600 0 11,691 0 11,191 0 0 0 141,011 0 0 11210.262 156.999 2,011,262 2.021,262 60.000 2,6710262 0 06.121 0 5,000 69.060 55.600 0 0 0 101,621 6.189 664,657 9s,610 0 761.067 60,000 711.656 771,666 0 50,101 0 81,169 77,599 156,766 161,116 1 161,626 '611591 -706 0 712.706 0 172,706 722.000 0 712,000 0 92,109 0 1.606,510 6 8,606,516 0 1,729,019 1,119,019 0 -20,016 0 169.267 0 896,267 100 567,601 568,111 0 116111 1::i:::::: 1.....;011 1:6:116:1: 16:1:6::1 1:6:1:6:1:::1:6:1: ::::6111 1°.:111.:10 TRANSFER TO BUDGETED FUNDS GENERA. FUND: Administration Traffic Engineering Streets Cemetery Library DEBT SERVICE PARKING OPERATIONS PARKING RESERVE POLLUTION CONTROL RESERVE RATER RESERVES LANDFILL RESERVES AIRPORT OPERATIONS TRANSIT DPERATIONS TRANSIT RESERVE JCCDG UNBUDGETED FUNDS BROADBAND TELECOMMUNICATIONS PARK LAND TRUST RECREATION FACILITIES RESERVE PARK LAID TRUST PENSION / RETIREMENT SYSTEMS: Police Fire CAPITAL IIIPAOVENENTS CITY OF IOWA CITY FY86 OPERATING BUDGET RECEIPTS - TRANSFERS IN* TRANSFER FROM —TT General Revenue Sharing 173,891 5,167 Prior Year Funding 131,000 Parking Operations x'190 Road Use Tax Road Use Tax 1,208,229 Perpetual Cm Trust 8,215 12,555 2.017.573 Cable TV Support AI rt Operations PD Control Operations /14'614 Pollution 72 85 525,368 Nater Operations 4.00D General Fund, Scalar Censer 701.765 Parking SYstws Operations 131,921 Pollution control Operations Yater Operations 195,121 SO•ppp 215,121 Water Raton@ 25,000 Landfill Operations 98,656 General Fund Administration General fund Administretloo 116,573 67,072 General Aevenue Sharing Transit Levy from General Fwd ]15.351 858,999 SO ODO Transit Operations 77.599 General Fund Administration TOTAL BUDGETED FUNDS 1.773.005 7,500 Equipment Replacement Reserve Finance Admin.-IOK Rotel Tax 17,813 Finance Admin. -15K Ibtel Tax 26.761 11.607 10.000 Park Land Purchase Trust s Agency Fwd 296,321 415,332 711.656 Trust A Agency Fund General Fund 22'000 � Road Use Tax Federal Revenue Sharing 3P3'6.71E 37 8 TOTAL URBUDGETED FUNDS 1.145.11B) GRAND TOTAL LH& UB6&U e Description of transfers appear on the following chart: Disbursements•Transferl Out. I CITY OF IOWA CITY FY86 OPERATING BUDGET DISBURSEMENTS - TRANSFERS OUT Ln I I U) I I 'N TRANSFER FROM TRANSFER TO DESCRIPTION AMOUNT BUDGETED FUNDS j GENERAL FUND: Administration Trans Iona City's Portion Operatln9 Subsidy 77.399 446,677 j Trmslt Operations Transit Opentlons Trmeatt lay 316,3S1 I N Airport Operations 166 of Motel Tu Opentloyy Subsidy Pere Lauf Percesse 9y,656 26,763 I 159 of spree Ls Future Fee "Islas Reserve D(oriamond Marcor Olemend 1/ Llph[t 26,761 22.000 1,0)5,)89 Capital Prolecls • i Broedbmd Teleccomwiutlons Doeral Fund Adelnlatratlon Gmeral Fund, Llbrary Prior Tes' failing Payback a Cable TB Support 6,03 12,600 -. Equipment Replamet Reserve Reserve fa future Replacmnt 7.500 26,318 ' Perks Park Lend Trust Park lm Purchase 10,000 I,OOD Senear Center Parking Operations Reserve Parting at Solar Cater FAPBING SYSTEMS: Operations General Toad Adalnistratim Nature Parklo9 fines 111,000 20,000 — General fund Admisl6lrARim Rennal { Iprov oat Reserve Lou Npgmt. Puking Lot At ter BooedW Resolution 60.00D Bond 6 Interest Slabla9 As for Band Resolution 611.765 872,765 POLLUTION pera CONTions OL: Operations Nmmal { Improvement Reserve As For Bud No alesion 21,000 12,000 .... Bond A Interest $*serve Bond 6 Interest SIrAln9 Reserve As For Bond Namlutlo As Per Bond Resolution 101,921 Debt Service Abated 60 Bands 111.611 552,175 NATER: Oyerattoes Oapreclatloa. Installed { sproveevent Reserve As To Bared Resolution 76,000 ,r serve Bond { Inured Resume As Far Bond Resolution 70,000 121,121 Bond { Interest Reserve As For Band Resolution Abated 60 Bands 72.851 267,9)8 _ c Reserves Debt Service Bond { Interest Sinking Reserve Cell of Bonds 50,000 ._. i LAW ILL:FutYra j Operetims Landfill Reserve_ Lod Acquisition 23.DOO 6( AIRPORT: rations Debt Service Abated GO Bonds 38.0011 TRANSIT. Operations Transit Reserve Rsplumnt of Ruses 60,000 I TRUST { AGENCY FUD Pension { Retirement System Pension { Retirement System police fire 296.311 115.]32 711,656 •— ROAD USE TA1 General Fund, Streets General Fund, Traffic Englnmerlmg Operations Operations 1,208,229 108,190 -- Capital Improvements: s000u forr8aadtExtra•WidthIs 7/,000 1,739,119 GENERAL REVENUE SHARING General Fund Administration Aid to Agencies Operating Subsidy 191 1/1,072 Transit Operations Capitol Projects Undetignaud Projects 326.718 567,681 TOTAL 9=110 FUNDS 5.910.211 ._ IM19UD6ETID FUNDS PERPETUAL CARE TRUST General Fund. Cmtery Maintenance of lots 8.2/5 •- TOTAL UIBUDGETED FUNDS 8.215 _ GRAND TOTAL 6,916,/M r 1 I I WHERE THE MONEY COMES FROM I i I I� J ly IW f ^M�f 1 r 7 Federal FundL State Funding I i I - I � ' rUw I JI � I CITY OF IOWA CITY FY86 OPERATING BUDGET SUMMARY OF RECEIPTS 6 EXPENDITURES ALL FUNDS Development Community Protection 19% /Policy t Administration lit WHERE THE MONEY GOES Home L Community Environment 57% CITY OF IOWA CITY FY86 OPERATING BUDGET SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES WHERE THE MONEY GOES - ALL FUNDS BY FUND WHERE THE MONEY GOES - GENERAL FUND DEPT./DIVISION CITY OF IOWA CITY FY86 OPERATING BUDGET SUMMARY OF RECEIPTS 6 EXPENDITURES GENERAL FUND WHERE THE MONEY COMES FROM Comity Protection 329 Home E Community Environment 24% WHERE THE MONEY GOES Human Development 22Z Icy E Administration 22% 1 1 1 a 15 14 g13 0 12 1- CITY OF IOWA CITY IMPACT OF INFLATION ON THE BUDGET FY78 - 86 -330 -320 -310 -300 -290 n -280 z -270 c -260 -250 v _ -240 -230 ^' -220 0 -- -210 x -200 -190 -180 -170 -160 -150 -140 -130 -120 -110 -100 FY78 FY79 FY80 FY81 FY82 FY83 FY84 FY85 ** FY86 ***.,amu 190.9 205.2 232.6 259.4 281.5 294.1 305.2 314.2 326.8 9,436,592 10,331,072 111,690:494 13,870,77415,550,404 16,680,262 18,503,748 20,038,277 20,391,8444,943,212 5,034,635 5,026008 5,347,253 5,524,122 5,671,629 6,062,827 6,376,563 6,239,854 �113 M1;,I •�•• Budget in Constant Dollars Budget Consumer Price Index, 1967 raw Cost of Inflation t *Base year of Consumer Price Index **As of December 1984 ***Estimated 4% increase over FY85 _ CITY COUNCIL CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY CITY MANAGER HUNAN RELATIONS BROADBAND TELECOMMUNICATIONS FINANCE GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS' CIVIL RIGHTS' PLANNING 6 PROGRAN•DEVELOPNCN PUBLIC NORKS ADNINISTRATION C.B.D. MAINTENANCE ENERGY CONSERVATION POLICE FIRE ANIMAL CONTROL HOUSING 6 INSPECTION SERVICES TRAFFIC. ENGINEERING STREET SYSTEM MAINTENANCE FORESTRY CEMETERY PARKS 6 RECREATION LIBRARY CITY OROMMLU4ISTAUTHILLD ENdOOOLING FULL•TE E1 ALENTS ..;...• FULL / 86 PRRT ...ww.• ;;Ejvw. FY86 FULL ORT .ww.ww TING TIML TOTAL .?INC TINE TOTAL 7.00 •400 7.00 •7.00 .00 .7.00 3.00 .35• 3.25 .3.00 AS :3.25- 3000 1.00 '3.00 •6.00 •.00 4,00 9.00 •.00 3.00 •3.00 •,00 :3.00 3.00 •000 3.00 •3000 .,Do :3.00' 1'.00 •050 1:50 '1.00 •,50 X3,80 31.00 1.62 92.62 32.00 .1.62 33.63 2.00 .00' 3.00 2.00 .00 9.00 1.00 y00 .1100 1.00 •,00 •3000 6.90 •.6/ 7.56 6.90 •.69 •7.51 10.00 •000 10.00 10.00 •,00 10.00 2.00 •,00 2000 2000 •,00 2,00 1,00 •.00 1,00 1.00 •.00 •1,00 .00 •950 .50 •.00 •.50 •,50 63.00 1900 64.00 63.00 1.00 6400 50,00 •.00 50.00 51,00 •.00 51,00 4.00 •.00 4.00 4.00 •.00 •4.00 11.00 .00 11.00 11,00 .00 11,00 5.00 .00 5,00 6,00 •.00 8,00 18.50 ,00 18.50 15,50 •,00 18.50 2.00 .00 2,00 2.00 •.00 2.00 3.00 •000 3.00 3.00 •.00 9900 20.00 1.75 21.75 31000 1.25 .22.25• 20.00 6.50 26-950 20000 6.50 26950 SENIOR CENTER q TOTAL GENERAL FUND PARKING OPERATION& POLLUTION CONTROL.OPERATIONS NATER OPERATIONS' REFUSE COLLECTION OPSRAlIOM6l LAND►ILL OPERATIONS AIRPORT OPERATIONS .TRANSIT OPERATIONS •• TOTAL ENTERPRISE FUNDS JOHNSON COUNTY COUN0I16 Or GOV LOUIPMENT-MAINTENANCE ASSISTED HOUSING CONN DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT 0 TOTAL OTHER FUNDS itis GRAND TOTAL 06 OPERAtOIWAG BUDGET AUTNFULL0lINCR000IVA4CNTSING w•L;... FwO• 0000'.. ....... FYS6 •.••..• r F FULL ppAR! LIME TING TOTAL TIME TIML TOTAL .•.. -.000 memo 4.00 •.00 4.00 4,00 00 • 00 177,40 1240 290 20 291.40 12.30 293.70 17.00 5.50 25.50 17.00 9.50 25.50 17.00 .00 17.00 17.00 •.00 17.00 22.00 •.00 22.00 22.00 •.00 22.00 10.75 .00 10.75 10.75 •,00 10.75 6.75 •400 6.75 6.75 •,00 6,76• 1.00 •000' 1600 1.00 .00 •1.00 21.00 20.25 48-25 29 00 20.25 49.25 102.50 2S 75 131:25 102 50 25.75 1I1.2S 2.90 1.05 3.95 2.90 1.09 .3095 15.00 •.00 15.00 17.00 .DO 17.00 6.00 •075• 6.75 6.00 .75 6.75 3.20 75 3.95 '3.20 .75 3.95 27.10 2.55 29268 29.10 2.55 31jdU 4o7.06 44,13 451 13 413 00 43.63 456.63•