HomeMy WebLinkAbout1985-05-07 Bd Comm. minutesMINUTES
CITY ATTORNEY REVIEW AND SELECTION ADVISORY COMMITTEE
APRIL 8, 1985 - 4:30 P.M.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Neuhauser, Neely, Hayek, Bartley, Seward
MEMBERS ABSENT: Hauserman, Green, McDonald (Ex -officio)
STAFF PRESENT: Carroll
SUMMARY OF RELEVANT DISCUSSION:
1. Selection of Candidates for Interview
The Committee discussed applications received to date and listed each
member's preferences for finalists for interview. Committee members
Hauserman and Green had previously submitted their preferences to
Carroll, as they would be unable to attend the meeting. Candidates
Appleby, Boyle, Klaus, Timmons, Alexander, Hart, Klein, McCauley, were
selected for interview. Several others candidates' resumes were held, to
be considered if a second round of interviewing is to be conducted.
Applications received will continue to be monitored by Neuhauser and
Carroll and may be added to the interview list. Carroll will contact
applicants and make arrangements with them for interviews.
2. Interview Logistics
Interviews will be conducted on Saturday, April 13 beginning at 8:30 a.m.
Wednesday, April 17, will be used as a back-up interview date. Inter-
views are expected to last approximately 45 minutes. Since it will not
be possible for all Committee members to meet, have dinner, etc. with
candidates, it was decided that no member would do so. City staff will
make arrangements for transportation, candidate meals, etc.
Candidates requesting that their interviews be conducted in closed
session will be asked to sign a written request.
Members will be assigned to reference checking following the interviews.
3. Next Meetings
Saturday, April 13, 8:30 a.m. - Interviews, Civic Center Conference Room.
Wednesday, April 17, 4:30 p.m. - Interview and Review of Applications,
Rec Center Room B.
7(.5
MINUTES
CITY ATTORNEY REVIEW AND SELECTION ADVISORY COMMITTEE
SATURDAY, APRIL 13, 1985 - 8:30 A.M.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Neuhauser, Neely, Hayek, Bartley, Seward, Hauserman, Green,
MEMBERS ABSENT: McDonald (Ex -officio)
STAFF PRESENT: Carroll
SUMMARY OF RELEVANT DISCUSSION:
1. It was moved by Hayek, seconded by Bartley, to adjourn to closed session
to evaluate the professional competency of an individual whose appoint-
ment is being considered when necessary to prevent needless and irrepara-
ble injury to that individual's reputation and that individual requests a
closed session. Aye: Neuhauser, Neely, Hayek, Bartley, Seward,
Hauserman, Green. Nay: None.
2. The Committee adjourned from the closed session.
3. Interview of John Klaus
The interview of City Attorney applicant John Klaus was conducted in open
session.
4. It was moved by Bartley, seconded by Green, to adjourn to closed session
to evaluate the professional competency of an individual whose appoint-
ment is being considered when necessary to prevent needless and irrepara-
ble injury to that individual's reputation and that individual requests a
closed session. Aye: Neuhauser, Neely, Hayek, Bartley, Seward,
Hauserman, Green. Nay: None.
5. The meeting adjourned at 7:30 p.m. The next meeting was scheduled for
Wednesday, April 17, 1985 at 4:30 p.m. in the Recreation Center Room B.
7&_5
MINUTES
CITY ATTORNEY REVIEW AND SELECTION ADVISORY COMMITTEE
WEDNESDAY, APRIL 17, 1985 - 4:30 P.M.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Neuhauser, Hayek, Green, Hauserman, Bartley, Neely, Seward
MEMBERS ABSENT: McDonald (Ex -officio)
STAFF PRESENT: Carroll
SUMMARY OF RELEVANT DISCUSSION:
1. Candidate Interview
It was moved by Hayek and seconded by Green to adjourn to executive
session to evaluate the professional competency of an individual whose
appointment is being considered when necessary to prevent needless and
irreparable injury to that individual's reputation and that individual
requests a closed session. Aye: Neuhauser, Hayek, Green, Hauserman,
Bartley, Neely, Seward. Nay: None.
2. Adjourn to Open Session
3. Review of Applications Received
Carroll stated that due to a printer's error in the ad published by the
Iowa Bar Newsletter the application closing date was inaccurately listed
as April 25 instead of April 15 in that publication. It will be neces-
sary to continue to accept applications until the 25th.
The Committee reviewed applications previously received and applications
received since the last meeting. At the next meeting a second round of
interviews will be scheduled. Applicants Birdwell, Campbell, Kelinson,
Winn, Roeder, Morrissey, Walding, Nervig, and Truell were discussed as
potential candidates for the second round of interviews. Carroll, Hayek
and Bartley will do some preliminary reference checking
in these
ill alcandi-
dates prior to the April 29 meeting. New applications
so be
reviewed at that time.
3. Next Meeting
The Mayor will be asked to attend the final Committee meeting for a
discussion of the candidates selected to be recommended as finalists to
the City Council.
The next meeting is scheduled for Monday, April 29 at 4:30 at the Rec
Center Room B.
rt of
Meetigs
datesnwillibeswill be finalizedhatdtheeAprilt29ameeting. week of
/(OS
MINUTES
CITY ATTORNEY REVIEW AND SELECTION ADVISORY COMMITTEE
MONDAY, APRIL 29, 1985 - 4:30 P.M.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Hayek, Green, Hauserman, Neely, Sewerd
MEMBERS ABSENT: Bartley, Neuhauser, McDonald (ex officio)
STAFF PRESENT: Carroll
SUMMARY OF RELEVANT DISCUSSION:
1. Acting Chairperson
John Hayek was selected as Acting Chairperson in the absence of Mary
Neuhauser.
2. Approval of Minutes
The minutes of the meeting of April 8, 13 and 17 were approved as
written.
3. Discussion of Additional Candidates for Interview
Carroll and Hayek reviewed the reference and background information
obtained from telephone calls for the additional applicants identified at
the last meeting as potential interview candidates. Committee members
voted to interview candidates Winn and Truell. Carroll will obtain
additional information about candidates Birdwell, Kelinson, and Monk and
will consult with Hayek about scheduling interviews for these candi-
dates.
4. Interview Scheduling
Interviews will be conducted Monday, May 6 at 3:00 at the Iowa City
Recreation Center.
5. Final Meeting - Recommendations
The final Committee meeting to discuss recommendations to the City
Council will be conducted Wednesday, May 8 at 4:30 p.m, in the Iowa City
Recreation Center.
766-
tb
MINUTES
PARKS AND RECREATION COIMIISSION
APRIL 10, 1985
MEMBERS PRESENT: Riddle, Jordison, Alvarez, Hradek, Steinbrech, Jennings, Willis,
and Martin
MEMBERS ABSENT: Mitchell
STAFF PRESENT: Cassady and Harvey
GUESTS PRESENT: Anne Glenister, Project GREEN; Lee Copenhaver and Steve West,
Iowa City Community Band; P.L. West; Susan Howe; Flo Beth Ehninger;
Ann Larson; Kathy and Peter Wallace; Mark Meier; Jim and Judy West;
Deb Schmeiser; Ruth Heffner; Larry Fountain; and Betty McKray, Iowa
City Community Theatre.
RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE CITY COUNCIL
None.
SUMMARY OF DISCUSSION AND FORMAL ACTION TAKEN
Hradek stated that she would like to amend page 4, paragraph 6, of the March 13
minutes to read that the neighborhood is considering contributing a picnic table and
a2iece of playground equipment to the park.
Moved by Alvarez, seconded by Steinbrech, to approve the minutes as amended. Unanimous.
BAND SHELL DISCUSSION
Al Cassady stated that a group of staff, Commission members, Copenhaver and West, and
several neighbors had taken a trip to City Park to view three additional sites.
There would be congestion at Shelter 15 (space and parking) and noise from traffic at
the entrance to Lower City Park. College Green had problems with parking and past
objections from neighbors when a shelter was proposed to be built there.
There was considerable discussion regarding the tour to view additional sites, financ-
ing, new restroom facility, overbuilding at Upper City Park, a portable band shell,
suitability of the proposed site, neighborhood planning, and problems with waiting
and tabling the issue.
Moved by Willis, seconded by Steinbrech, that the Commission reaffirms its strong
support of the concept of a community outdoor performing arts center, but makes no
recommendation as to its siting at the present time.
Ayes: Jordison, Alvarez, Steinbrech, Jennings, and 'Willis
Nays: Martin and Hradek
Motion carried.
COMMITTEE REPORTS
Moved by Willis, seconded by Jennings, that the Riverfront Commission minutes not be
included in future ag,.ida packets. Unanimous.
Alvarez reported that the proposed mural for Riverfest is still in the planning stage.
�76 6
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION MINUTES
APRIL 10, 1985
PAGE 2
DEVELOPMENT OF A PARK PLAN
Cassady reported that the neighborhood open space standards would be studied in the
coming months in preparation for proposing an ordinance for a minimum open space
ordinance. The focus will be a five to eight acre neighborhood park concept. The
Advisory Committee will consist of two members from the Parks and Recreation Commis-
sion; two members from the Planning and Zoning Commission; and two staff members
(Cassady and Barry Beagle, Planning). The Committee will be preparing a plan in
advance of the ordinance which will hopefully provide a rational approach to future
parkland acquisition. They will be comparing plans from around the country.
Cassady asked for two Commission members to serve on the committee and Riddle said
he and Hradek would serve.
Cassady said it is important for the community to know that the Commission is both
active and passive oriented in terms of parkland acquisition. The most recent
acquisition is Ryerson's Woods, a fifty acre park that will be dedicated to nature
trails. Cassady added that minimum open space study focuses on neighborhood parks
because it would not be fair for a developer to bear the expense of a city-wide park
that would benefit the entire community.
DIRECTOR'S REPORT
Cassady reported that the deed and the $200,000 for Elm Grove Park was'transferred to
the City's parkland acquisition fund on April 9.
The proposed four acre Hunter's Run parkland will not be accepted at this time because
of poor drainage conditions and a six acre parcel will be pursued in the future.
A contract has been awarded to Hall Engineering for the handicapped restrooms at City
Park. The structure will have a wood exterior in order to blend in aesthetically
with the park.
Work on the Mercer Diamond .i4 lighting project will be completed this week.
The IPRA Conference had 380 delegates in attendance and the Host Committee met all of
their goals. He thanked the Commission for attending the Conference. Jennings con-
gratulated Cassady and staff on the outstanding conference.
OTHER BUSINESS
Riddle asked Jordison if the swimming pool was shelved at the University and Jordison
answered that he was not certain. Riddle asked Cassady to ascertain whether the issue
has been shelved. The Commission and staff discussed the issue.
i
It was agreed to have a special meeting on June 12 to review the IPRA workshop the
Commission attended and establish goals and objectives.
The Commission discussed the proposed performing arts center at length and it was
unanimous that the Commission would not let the issue due.
Moved by Steinbrech, seconded by Martin, to encourage the Community Band to play in
Upper City Park this summer. Unanimous.
r.
766
JJ'V'� "N
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION MINUTES
APRIL 10, 1985
PAGE 3
Cassady informed the Commission that Project GREEN would be conducting an evergreen
clinic on April 27 and that the City Forester and Sheri Thomas from CBD would be
assisting.
Cassady reported that the Foundation Committee had met and discussed the possibility
of a grant to obtain start-up funds.
Moved by Willis, seconded by Martin, to adjourn at 9:25 p.m.
OV.QQ..
Dee Harvey, Sec tary
Parks and Recre tion Commission
766
I y'.
MINUTES
IOWA CITY HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION
MARCH 25, 1985 - 7:30 P.M.
SENIOR CENTER CLASSROOM
MEMBERS PRESENT: Burnside, Doane, Barcelo, Farrant, Weilbrenner, Belle, Reed
MEMBERS ABSENT: Hawkins, Felton
STAFF PRESENT: Klein, Alexander, Helling
GUESTS: Tan Maupin, KCJJ; Malcolm Hewitson, Ellen Johnston, 'Dick
McCartt and Rick Innis, from Sheller -Globe; Tam Hobart,
Attorney for Sheller -Globe
RECOMMENDATIONS TO CITY COUNCIL:
None.
RECOMMENDATIONS TO CITY MANAGER OR STAFF:
None.
SUMMARY OF RELEVANT DISCUSSION:.
1. The meeting was called to order at 7:38 p.m. by Chairperson Burnside.
2. Farrant moved to approve the minutes of February 25, 1985. The motion
was seconded by Doane. The motion carried unanimously.
3. In conciliation:
a. E/R, 8-28-8103. Conciliation continues.
b. E/R, 2-27-8402. A conciliation meeting occurred on March 22, 1985.
The Respondent is to get back to the conciliation team on April 3.
c. E/S 8 SO, 4-19-8402. Letters have gone out to the parties apprising
them of the team's probable cause determination. A conciliation
meeting will be scheduled.
d. E/R, 4-19-8201. The chairperson will schedule a team meeting after
April 1.
4. In legal:
There are six cases in legal.
5. Cases to assign:
PA/R, 5-22-8405 and PA/R, 6-20-8406. This case was assigned to Belle
(Chair); Barcelo, Doane.
2617
Iowa City Human Rights Commission
March 25, 1985
Page 2
6. Public hearing (Boggess v. Sheller -Globe):
Most Commissioners, with Farrant being the exception, had not finished
reading the transcript, post -hearing briefs and the hearing officer's
recommendation. There was no discussion of the case amongst the Commis-
sioners. Tom Hobart, the attorney for Sheller -Globe, spoke and told the
Commissioners he and his client felt the hearing officer's recommendation
was incorrect for the following reasons:
1) Her finding was not supported by the evidence.
2) The hearing officer failed to consider some vital information
(testimony given under an offer of proof which is testimony given
but not accepted because it is considered irrelevant to the case)
that supports the claim of the witnesses being concerned with
their safety.
3) The burden of proof was applied incorrectly. Hobart said the
employer showed a non-discriminatory reason for their action but
the burden of proving this to be pretextual was not transferred
back to Mr. Boggess.
4) The hearing officer discussed in her recommendation what she
perceived to be comparable situation and Hobart does not think the
evidence supports this because, in his opinion, there were no
comparable situations.
Burnside encouraged the Commissioners to read all of the material so that
a decision based on being informed could be made.
7. Community Education:
The cable TV project is on hold until May or June at that time Drew
Shaffer, the City's Cable TV Specialist, anticipates having the resources
to assign this project; public service announcements continue to be
aired, Klein has heard a few; the February -March newsletter has been
distributed; 50 service groups were sent a letter inviting them to
"...put us to work for you" and encouraging then to place us on their
agenda. We also solicited a response from them on how we could better
serve them. Klein read the letter regarding ladies' night and Commis-
sioners felt comfortable with the letter which will be mailed to Iowa
City bars and restaurants along with a press release; Klein will contact
Gus Corrigan from the University of Iowa School of Journalism about
utilizing students from a public relations class for the purpose of
developing a survey to assess how the community perceives the Commission
and what areas the community would.like the committee to explore.
8. Old Business:
a. Conciliation Training - To occur on April 8 at the Senior Center from
6-9 p.m. The trainers are staff persons from the Iowa Civil Rights
Commission: Carol Groh and Eileen Kapaun.
79/7
Iowa city Human Rights Commission
March 25, 1985
Page 3
b. Ladies' Night - Refer to discussion under Community Education.
c. Isabel Turner Proclamation - Agnes Kuhn, a former Commissioner and a
friend of Isabel's, stopped by staff's office and picked up a copy of
the press release written on Isabel's proclamation. Agnes said she
was going to encourage Marlene Perrin to write about the proclamation
in her column.
9. New Business:
a. Alexander brought the Commissioners up to date on the Black History
Month issue before the Iowa City CSchool Schol chool Baarproposa rowhich
of
concerned parents had given
encompassed both short and long range goals. The short range goals
included proclaiming February as Black History Month, with an
accumulation of material educators could' use in the classroom as
opposed to using material on celebrating groundhogs. The long range
goals basically address the issue of integrating the school dis-
trict's curriculum to correctly reflect the history of black Ameri-
cans. During the March 12 School Board meeting, the administration
for the School Board responded to the parents' proposal with recom
mendations very similar to what the group had requested. Recommenda-
tions are currently being implemented.
b. Handicapped Parking - Belle stated that in his opinion a $15 fine for
illegally parking in a handicapped -designated parkng spa
ace was a
token amount. Belle said he has observed handicappedpeople unable
to park and he has also noticed that ln9 the east coast these spaces. citizens
receive a $100 fine for illegally p
felt a $100 fine gets citizens' attention and is a deterrent. h tHell
stated the state legislature is considering a bill giving cities the
option to fine anywhere from $1-$100 which allows the The localIowa governCitying
body to decide what amount would be appropriate.
Council has also gone on record endorsing this bill. Commissioners
decided to send a letter to theappropriate person in the legislature
with a copy sent to the City Council and copies sent t othertheir human
rights commissions within the state of Iowa encouraging
pport
of the bill.
c. Barcelo described her concern with the lack of media coverage on the
conference "The Decade of the Hispanic" yet there was front page
media coverage concerning alleged "illegal aliens" being seized by
federal agents working for the U.S. Immigration Department and also
the arrest by Iowa City officers of one Hispanic for theft and two
others waiting in a truck in the K -Mart parking lot because "some-
thing didn't seem right." Barcelo encouraged the commissioners to
review the newspaper articles and then Commissioners will respond
appropriately.
d. Alexander announced thetelevising
8 00 p m.A ClasThe sprogramelshows how �a
t1985 elevision, March 26,
Ricef ield, to adiscriminatedeaer
ttaher
third grade class
about what it
feels
like
-7(01
17
Iowa City Human Rights Commission
March 25, 1985
Page 4
e. Burnside described how it is her understanding that members of the
i city attorney search committee have mixed feeling's about asking the
city attorney applicants one or two questions to assess their
knowledge and commitment to civil rights. Alexander informed the
I Commissioners two questions had been submitted to the committee with
the commitment question designated as the most important of the two.
10. The staff report was discussed.
11. The meeting adjourned at 8:30 p.m.
Minutes taken by Phyllis Alexander.
i
i
74%
i
74%
MINUTES
BROADBAND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
MARCH 5, 1985, 8-10 A.M.
CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS
PRESENT: Ehninger, Johnson, Sigrin, Terry, Twaler, Madsen
ABSENT: None
EXCUSED: None
STAFF PRESENT: Shaffer, Helling, Stewart
OTHERS PRESENT: Blough, Calderon of Heritage; Beeson of Ch. 28; Tiffany of
Iowa City Public Library; Hindman of Kirkwood/ECC/Ch. 27
RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL:
None.
i
MATTERS PENDING COUNCIL -COMMISSION DISPOSITION:
Selection of a consultant for the RFP/NPO process, Annual Programming Input
Forum, Triannual Review Hearing, 5A franchise fee.
SUMMARY OF DISCUSSION AND FORMAL ACTION TAKEN:
Flo Beth Ehninger has been reappointed to the BTC. William Twaler is the new
BTC member. Outgoing member Madsen will participate in the Annual Program-
ming Forum but not the Triannual Review. Ch. 27 will extend its programming
day to midnight weekdays and may program 2:30 to 10:00 p.m. Saturdays in
summer. Ch. 28 has a new color character generator and will broadcast the
next space shuttle flight.
Community Programming Guidelines are complete except for some editing and
copies should be available soon. The Guidelines were approved in substance
by the Commission. The new access brochures from Heritage are ready now.
Selection of a consultant for the RFP/NPO process will not be made until
after the franchise fee is received the end of March. Information/policy
sessions will be set up to include the consultant, BTC and possibly inter-
ested Councilmembers.
The BTS office has three interns this semester. Council has approved payment
to interns for next semester. The Mayor has written to the FCC that Iowa
City disagrees with the FCC's definition of effective competition. Iowa City
believes effective competition is constituted by five broadcast signals in a
35 mile radius while the FCC maintains that one broadcast signal is suffi-
cient. A booklet from the National League of Cities regarding the new
federal cable legislation is expected soon.
The City will purchase an automatic playback deck for $14,000. The item
should arrive in the next 60 days, although a place to put it has not yet
been identified. The BTS processed four complaints this month. Government
Channel 29 video shoots have increased 200X over the last year. A recent
meeting with Heritage on the 5% franchise fee issue was inconclusive.
m
MINUTES
BROADBAND TELECOMMUNIATIONS COMMISSION
MARCH 5, 1985
PAGE 2
Sportstime will be closing out operations March 31, 1985. A replacement
service has not been decided upon at this time. Heritage obtained about 900
subscribers to the Disney Channel following launch of the service. Some
subscribers dropped other pay services to take the Disney service. Commer-
cial insert ad equipment is expected by Heritage in the next two to three
weeks. Rates for these local ads are being formulated and should be in the
$10 to $16 range for 30 second spots. Long-term revenues from local ads is
expected to be about $100,000, which will in turn increase the franchise fee
amount to the City. These ads will be placed on the satellite channels, such
as ESPN and MTV.
Channel 28 has the capability to roll emergency messages across the bottom of
the screen when needed. Channels 26 and 5 can also do this, but the Company
cannot roll messages across the screen on the pay movie channels. The Arts &
Entertainment Network may take the channel space vacated by Sportstime.
Problems continue with service of access video equipment by Pratt. Both the
company and the library have experienced problems with Pratt. The company is
working with the BTS office to improve the quality of the picture for the
Council cablecasts. Lighting in the Council Chambers may be inadequate.
Blough will investigate the matter and make a recommendation. The question
of using return on investment as a basis for requests for a rate increase was
discussed.
Use of the Community Programming Center is up and sign-ups for workshops have
increased. Prime time on the public access channel is booked heavily. The
library has appointed a subcommittee to work on the Channel 26 NPO project.
Many elderly are unaware that they may subscribe to cable at a lower rate.
Access Iowa City will hold a production meeting at the CPC on March 12.
Their annual spaghetti dinner will be April 26 at 10 S. Gilbert.
Election of BTC officers will be March 13, prior to the Programming Input
Forum.
MEETING TO ORDER:
Terry called the meeting to order at 8:05 a.m.
ANNOUNCEMENTS:
Terry stated that this meeting would serve as the February meeting and he had
invited member -elect Bill Twaler to sit in. Terry also welcomed Flo Beth
Ehninger who was reappointed and will serve her second term. The Annual
Programming Input Forum will be held next week, March 13. Outgoing member
Jen Madsen will sit on the dais and participate in the forum with the other
members. Terry sai: he would like to see the triannual review completed no
later than June 1, 1985. There will be a potluck dinner for Commissioners,
staff and Heritage participants next week between the 4:00 meeting and the
6:00 p.m. Input Forum in the Council Conference Room. City Legal staff has
said there is no problem with this as long as Commission business is not
discussed.
76k
MINUTES
BROADBAND TELECOMMUNIATIONS COMMISSION
MARCH 5, 1985
PAGE 3
MINUTES:
Moved by Johnson, seconded.by Sigrin, to approve the minutes of October 23,
1984. There were no corrections and the motion passed unanimously. Moved by
Ehninger, seconded by Johnson, to approve the minutes of January 22, 1985.
Ehninger noted corrections needed on page 4, second line, the word should be
considerable rather than consideration. Also on page five, second line,
Ehninger said it should read converter box ranges, instead of ranes. Ehninger
also asked that references to Professor Franklin Miller include his title or
at least his first name. There were no further corrections and the motion
passed unanimously.
PUBLIC DISCUSSION:
Rick Hindman of Kirkwood Telecommunications/Educational Cable Consortium/Ch.
27, handed out copies of a Program Guide for Ch. 27. Hindman also distrib-
uted copies of the current policy regarding school cancellation notices to be
shown on Ch. 27. Channel 27 will extend its programming day to midnight and
will be black from midnight to 7:00 a.m., and may program from 2:30 to 10:00
p.m. on Saturdays in summer. Hindman plans to send copies of the Program
Guide to Coralville and Johnson County Commissions. Beeson reported that Ch.
28 has a new color character generator which has been on the system for three
months. Channel 28 will telecast all activities and transmissions of the
next space shuttle flight. This p�ogramning has been cleared with NASA and
will continue from launch.
COMMUNITY PROGRAMMING GUIDELINES REPORT:
Sigrin commended Calderon for her work on the guidelines, including major
changes which Sigrin feels will be more encouraging to new applicants. Sigrin
noted that this draft is the first that has addressed the issue of user
liability.
Shaffer asked for clarification of a few points such as whether there would
be a charge for the use'of equipment, and what the procedure is for cable -
casting. Calderon replied that a use fee may be charged for use over the 40
hour per month maximum. Programs should be submitted for cablecasting at
least two weeks prior to the desired cablecasting date in order that the
information may be submitted to the Press -Citizen for publication. Johnson
asked whether the document would be made available to the public in its
current form, and whether it would be distributed free to the public.
Calderon said this would be the final form, (except for some editing) to be
used by Gary Cosnett in teaching the Guidelines workshop, and that copies
would be available at the Library, in the Community Programming Center and
through Shaffer's office. The City has agreed to offer copies of the Guide-
lines at cost to the public.
Johnson expressed the belief that heads of major denominations in the
community, major unions, corporations and other major organizations should be
sent a copy of the Guidelines with a cover letter so that they may be made
aware of the opportunities available for their constituents at the Community
Programming Center. Tiffany noted that the Library has a list of 500
organizations on its computer and the list is kept updated. Johnson said he
was thinking more along the lines of 50 organizations, just the largest or
MINUTES
BROADBAND TELECOMMUNIATIONS COMMISSION
MARCH 5, 1985
PAGE 4
most active. Blough asked whether there were plans to condense this document
into an outline form. Calderon said she plans to send out the brochure
Heritage has prepared as an outreach tool and after receiving feedback, send
a speaker to address a group, or send the Guidelines. Terry asked that an
agreement be worked out between Johnson's Public Awareness Subcommittee and
Heritage for dissemination of the Guidelines.
Sigrin moved and Madsen seconded that the Commission approve in substance the
new draft of the Community Programming Guidelines subject to editing. The
motion passed unanimously.
Johnson asked whether it might be possible to obtain a list of what'program-
ming is available on the various satellites that is not currently available
on the Iowa City Cable line-up. This list will be made available at the next
meeting.
PROGRESS REPORT ON NPO AND CONSULTANT:
Shaffer reported that he had delayed making his recommendation on selection
of a consultant until at least April because the franchise fee payment would
not be received until March 31, and payment of the consultant's fees would
come from the franchise fee. Shaffer suggested it may be well to set up
information/ policy sessions with the consultant, BTC and possibly interested
Councilmembers, as to the reasons -for forming a NPO. There was some agree-
ment on this point. Blough suggested a live studio telecast of such a
meeting. Johnson commented favorably on Shaffer's outline of the time frames
for the consultant/NPO process.
BTS REPORT:
Three interns have been obtained for this semester. Council has approved
monies to pay some interns for their work next semester. Each intern works
an average of 15 to 20 hours per week. Madsen referred to the letter from
the Mayor to the FCC regarding the definition in the new Federal cable
legislation of effective competition. Shaffer said that the FCC defines
effective competition as one broadcast signal. Iowa City maintains that
effective competition is at least five signals in a 35 mile radius. Madsen
also noted on page two of the Mayor's letter a reference to Congressman
Wirth's comments to the effect that "The entire franchise area is to be
wired." Shaffer said he had reviewed the Congressional record on this matter
and Mr. Wirth's comments to his colleagues was clear that what was intended
by this statement was not that everything in a community had to be wired, but
that the intention was to avoid a kind of "redlining," whereby a cable
operator might wire only the richer parts of a community while ignoring less
affluent areas. Shaffer said the City should soon be receiving a booklet on
the Cable Act from the National League of Cities.
The City has decided to purchase the automatic playback director for Ch. 29
at a price of $14,000. The deck should be arriving sometime in the next 60
days. The space for it has not yet been identified. The cost of the
playback deck and fees for the Washington attorneys have left a very small
balance in the BTC holdover account. Blough agreed to place the automatic
director system in the control room of the Community Programming Center.
MINUTES
BROADBAND TELECOMMUNIATIONS COMMISSION
MARCH 5, 1985
PAGE 5
The BTS has processed four complaints since last month and all have been
taken care of except one. The number of video shoots has gone up 200 to 250%
over the last year. City staff has begun to identify many new ways in which
they can make use of the video equipment, Channel 29 and the BTS staff.
Madsen noted the high level of Shaffer's work output and asked how much of
his time he is currently spending on research for the City's proposed
Telecommunications Department. Shaffer said although he has been spending
more time on that lately, there has been no decision on whether to go ahead
with it. The research is continuing with help from Becca Palmer. In
response to a question from Ehninger regarding the 5% franchise fee, Shaffer
i said a meeting had been held with City representatives and Nile McDonald of
Heritage last month which had been inconclusive. Currently, a report is
being prepared for Council setting out all of the possible scenarios and
alternatives on this matter. Council will meet in executive session this
month and the decision will be up to them.
i
HERITAGE REPORT:
Sportstime will be closing out operations March 31 for financial reasons.
Heritage is looking for alternative programming to replace Sportstime, but
apparently at this time, such alternatives do not exist. Launch of the
Disney Channel was completed with Heritage obtaining about 900 subscribers to
the Disney service. At the same time, about 180 subscribers dropped their
HBO service and 100 dropped Cinemax in exchange for Disney. This exchange
was expected. The Disney video signal is scrambled to non -subscribers but
the audio signal is left intact since Disney offers no objectionable mate-
rial. This is also considered a good marketing tool for the service. Insert
ad equipment is expected by Heritage in the next two to three weeks. Heritage
has hired sales executive Brian Small to oversee this project. This equip-
ment is slated to be used on four channels, Blough said, which will allow
Heritage to do local advertising of its programming including access, Disney,
and HBO/Cinemax. The ads will be in 30 and 60 second formats. The rate
schedule is being formulated right and should be slightly above AM radio
rates and below the rates for FM. This should be in the $10 to $16 range for
30 second buys. Bulk buys will be discounted accordingly. The original
budget for revenue from this project calls for $18,000 or $3,000 per month
for six months. The first year or two will be building years. Revenue
expected in the long run is expected to be around $100,000. Ad revenues
accruing to Heritage also mean more money for franchise fees, Blough said.
Blough said to his knowledge Heritage has no plans to buy Cox Communications
systems in Iowa. Currently Heritage does not have the capability to roll
emergency messages across the bottom of the screen on the movie channels, but
the City has the ability to blank all channels under the Civil Defense
authority. Beeson said the University's ch. 28 has the capability to roll
messages. Blough said it could be done on chs. 5 and 26. Blough described
what happens during a sun outage when the sun, satellite and receiving dishes
line up, which makes the home viewer's picture appear blurry.
Blough said Heritage, as an affiliate of Warner/AmEx the deliverer of the
Arts & Entertainment Network, had been attempting to iron out problems with
delivery of the service, but production problems exist with the audio feed on
the Playhouse series. Sigrin noted that a petition to bring this service to
FM
MINUTES
BROADBAND TELECOMMUNIATIONS COMMISSION
MARCH 5, 1985
PAGE 6
Iowa City may be presented at next week's Programming Input forum. Slough
said the possibility exists to substitute Arts d Entertainment for outgoing
Sportstime.
Madsen inquired about equipment problems. Shaffer said a letter from
Calderon to the BTC had come to him in the City mail regarding these prob-
lems. Pratt is finally beginning to respond to the problems with the new
equipment. Shaffer said that Calderon and her staff had attempted to work
with Shaffer's assistant, John Hess, and BTS interns on the last City Council
shoot on ch. 29, to resolve the video problems. Attempts have been made to
monitor the picture for Council shoots, but Slough suggested that the cable
system should be monitored rather than individual TV sets. Heritage will
continue to monitor the picture and better equipment will 'be used next time,
and additional warm-up time for the equipment will be allowed.
Terry said the Council lights may be inadequate. Blough said he will test
the current load; 3000 additional watts may be needed. Overhead installed
lights are preferred to portable side lighting. Heritage will continue to
try to correct the problem.
Madsen suggested that Blough's letter regarding increased costs as a justifi-
cation for a rate increase is misleading; that a rate increase should be
judged against entire revenues. Blough defended his position and said the
figures represent estimates for January through December 1985. Shaffer said
Heritage pro forma statement calls for a return on investment of up to 17%.
Blough said 7% is more realistic. Terry said a rate increase request from
Heritage based on return on investment would not be viewed favorably. Slough
said the courts have upheld the method. The limited partnership which owns
the Iowa City system is called Cablevision Associates Seven. Heritage is
the general partner with a 10% ownership.
Calderon said the access channel 26 brochures are ready for general distribu-
tion and workshop sign-ups have increased. Calderon will continue to keep a
tally of these numbers. Use of the Community Programming Center is up.
Local prime time on ch. 26 is heavily booked. One thousand brochures were
ordered at 75 cents per copy or $750 bulk rate. Reorders will cost less.
Interns will tape highlights of local producers' shows for a presentation in
April. The l6mm film projector was down at least three weeks. A new fuse
was needed from Kodak. Terry referred to the contract clause which calls for
back-up equipment. Calderon said she is looking into a service agreement
with another firm. Terry underscored the need for this service contract and
reminded the Heritage that the City Manager could, according to the franchise
agreement, rent or buy equipment at the Company's expense.
IOWA CITY PUBLIC LIBRARY REPORT:
Tiffany commented favorably on Shaffer's timetable for the development of the
RFP and the NPO. The Library has appointed a subcommittee to work on this
project. Tiffany is processing several complaints from the Senior Center and
Sabin School regarding the computer card catalog. Recently the library's
3/4" editor (part of the access equipment) has been down, and Tiffany is
investigating newer 1/2" models with low rates for downtime. The Library is
currently programming outreach to the elderly on the Library services and
featuring volunteers on the Library's ch. 20. Tiffany said it has recently
579 f
MINUTES
BROADBAND TELECOMMUNIATIONS COMMISSION
MARCH 5, 1985
PAGE 7
I tome to her attention that many elderly were unaware that they could sub-
scribe to the cable system at the basic service rate rather than the full
j package price of over $20. Blough noted that there is no bulk rate to the
Ecumenical Center.
I I
ACCESS IOWA CITY REPORT:
Stewart noted that AIC's next meeting on March 12 will be a production
meeting at the Comnunity Programming Center. The group expects to produce
public service announcements about access in general and AIC in particular.
i The annual spaghetti dinner will be held April 26 at 10 S. Gilbert. Stewart
asked Calderon for an update on the logo contest held a few years ago to
choose a logo for ch. 26. Calderon said Ban Daly had won, but that the
contest had not been promoted and very few entries had been received. Stewart
asked that the logo be revived. Blough suggested a contest to produce the
best ch. 26 30 second video.
NEW BUSINESS:
Terry reminded everyone that election of new officers is next week, March 13,
at the 4:00 meeting preceding the Programming Input Forum at 7:00 p.m which
will be cablecast live on ch. 29. Shaffer read a letter from Student Video
Producers saying thank you to the Commission and Heritage for a job well
done.
ADJOURNMENT:
Sigrin moved, Ehninger seconded the meeting adjourn. Motion passed unani-
mously. Meeting adjourned at 10:20 a.m.
Respectfully submitted,
AWm, w offer
Broadband Telecommunic ions Specialist
Im
MINUTES
BROADBAND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
MARCH 13, 1985 - 4-6 P.M.
CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS
PRESENT: Terry; Sigrin, Ehninger, Twaler, Johnson
ABSENT: None
EXCUSED: None
STAFF PRESENT: Shaffer, Stewart
OTHERS PRESENT: Blough Calderon, Graves of Heritage; former BTC member
Madsen; Beeson of Ch. 28; Tiffany of ICPL
RECOMMENDATIONS TO COUNCIL:
None.
MATTERS PENDING COUNCIL -COMMISSION DISPOSITION:
Triannual Review, RFP/NPD process, 5% franchise fee.
SUMMARY OF DISCUSSION AND FORMAL ACTION TAKEN:
Terry was re-elected Chair by acclamation. Ehninger was elected Vice -Chair.
Twaler*will be the new minutes reader. Questions at the Programming Input
Forum will not be limited in scope or range except that they should deal
primarily with programming. A list of alternative programming not currently
offered on the Iowa City cable system will be available' at the Council
Chambers for citizens attending the annual input forum. A petition to
receive Bravo! is expected to be presented at the Programming Forum. The
Triannual Review will be held sometime during the next two months and should
be completed by June 1. Plans for the Review should focus on Commissioner's,
goals and objectives. Research materials, such as financial information,
should be requested from Heritage in advance. Some items for the review may
include leased channel policie, FM leased space, raising funds for the access
channel by use of a check -off on Heritage's bill and the institutional
network.
Selection of a consultant to assist in developing an RFP for the nonprofit
organization is proceeding. This recommendation from the BTS is expected by
the next meeting. The BTC recommended to the company that the cable bill be
broken down into specific charges for basic service, pay, extra outlets, etc.
A written response to this request is expected by the next meeting. Discus-
sions with City Manager continue on establishment of a City Teleconmunica-
tions Department.
Monitoring of Council cablecasts will continue in an effort to improve
quality of audio and video. Acquisition of several cable systems signifi-
cantly increased income for Heritage in 1984. The Library and Access Iowa
City will no longer be consistent agenda items but can address the BTC during
Public Discussion or request an agenda item. Commissioners expressed
appreciation for Madsen's work on the Commission.
7W
Broadband Telecommunications Commission
March 13, 1986
Page 2
MEETING TO ORDER:
Terry called the meeting to order at 4:07 p.m.
MINUTES: None.
ANNOUNCEMENTS: None
ELECTION OF OFFICERS:
Johnson moved to nominate and elect Terry Chairperson by acclamation.
Approved unanimously. Terry moved and Johnson seconded that Ehninger be
nominated for Vice -Chair. There being no further nominations, Ehninger was
elected unanimously.
PUBLIC DISCUSSION:
None.
ANNUAL CABLE PROGRAMMING INPUT FORUM DISCUSSION:
Johnson asked whether there would be any need to limit the scope or range of
questions at tonight's forum. Terry said the questions should relate to
programming primarily as opposed to technical or financial questions, but
that there was no need to completely rule out any topic relating to the cable
system. Terry announced that any incoming phone call questions will be heard
over the loudspeaker system in the Council Chambers. Sigrin noted that
although Heritage is most capable of receiving programming from the SatCom 3R
and Galaxy I satellites, most of the public is unaware of the wealth of
programming available on these two satellites, beyond what is provided
currently by Heritage. Sigrin asked that a list of such alternative program-
ming choices be made available to the public. Terry said this list would be
made available by Shaffer at the door prior to the Programming Forum. Sigrin
suggested for the sake of those watching at home, that this list be referred
to during the cablecast, with a cross-section of those programs on the list
referred to specifically during the program.
Terry stated that in addition to his weekly meetings with Shaffer, he is now
attempting to meet with Slough as well, and they had recently discussed this
list. There was general agreement that this list should be read into
tonight's record. Slough had no objection. Graves of Heritage suggested
making a note of which of these programs are pay services. Shaffer said the
list is broken down by pay and basic services. Johnson also suggested a
three to five minute explanation as to "how programming gets here.' Madsen
cation might be needed to the viewers as to what
suggested that some clarifi
i types of programming is represented by the names of the programs on the list.
Terry cautioned against the possibility of opening up a "Pandora's box" with
all this additional programming, since there are at this time four filled
channels. one of these channels is reserved for leased purposes.
Sigrin reported that it is expected that a petition to receive Bravo! will be
presented at the Forum. Slough questioned how many of these signers would
still sign such a petition as a commitment to take the service if they knew
Broadband Telecommunications Commission
March 13, 1985
Page 3
what it costs 'to receive it. Discussion followed on replacement of the
outgoing Sportstime service with the Arts 8 Entertainment Network. Foreign
programming was'discussed as well as other sports program services. Blough
said when one program source is dropped the company generally attempts to
replace it with similar programming. Blough noted that promotional packages
are sometimes available from programmers which could be run on the channels
as a means of letting people know what other types of programming are
available. Terry asked that this possibility be pursued prior to the
Triannual Review Hearing. Madsen suggested putting the list of these other
offerings in the rack at the Community Programming Center.
TRIANNUAL REVIEW HEARING DISCUSSION:
Shaffer said the Triannual Review shall be dealt with the next two or three
months. Terry said it should be completed by June 1. The previous Triannual
Review was a topic of conversation at 11 BTC meetings and took up the entire
agenda at two meetings. Plans for this Triannual Review should focus on
goals and objectives of the Commissioners. Documents and records to be used
as research material should be required from Heritage in advance. Such items
might include financial information, the performance of the technical aspects
of the system and Institutional Network uses and applications. Some items
not attended to as yet might include leased channel policies, FM leased
space, raising of funds for the access channel by use of a check -off on the
cable bill. Some items of previous discussion were lower cost or free basic
service, state -of -the art and the Institutional Network.
Johnson asked whether the City would hire an outside entity for the technical
check, and who would pay for this. Terry said the company is required to
perform its own annual technical check but if the City wants to do its own
check, the City must pay for that. The Company's check follows FCC guide-
lines.
BTS REPORT:
Shaffer said selection'of a consultant for the RFP/NPO process is going ahead
on schedule and he should have a recommendation.by the next BTC meeting. The
BTS has received three complaints since the last meeting. One refers to
extending cable service to 1542 Buresh Ave. Blough said he is working on
this. Another complaint dealt with a program seen on Ch. 26 at 8:00 p.m, on
March 7. The third complaint Shaffer said he had just received and had not
yet had a chance to discuss with Calderon.
Shaffer asked that the BTC have input on which tapes the Library archives and
keeps for later check-out. Shaffer noted that at the last meeting he had
asked Blough to see whether it was possible to break out the charges on the
cable bill as to what people are being charged for basic service, pay
services, and extra outlets. General comments were made regarding this with
Blough and Graves indicating it could be done but that Heritage accounting
people in Des Moines would not be happy to do it. Blough said he thinks most
subscribers know what their services cost and what they are paying for. Terry
asked if Blough had noticed significant up or downgrading of service in a
subscriber's first year of service. Blough said approximately 35: would
experience some activity in the first year. Further discussion followed on
/6W
Broadband Telecommunications Commission
March 13, 1985
Page 4
bottom line billing versus a breakdown of charges. Marketing personnel
generally feel that to itemize billing encourages subscribers to eliminate
some services in an effort to cut costs.
Johnson moved and Sigrin seconded that the BTC express to the Company the
Commission's desire that the cable bill be broken down so that the public
knows ed
indicatedtit that is written ing for.
woulde beivforthcomingusfrom the 1Blough
Company by
the end of 30 days, or before the next meeting.
Shaffer reported that discussions continue with City Manager Heal Berlin
regarding a City telecommunications department. Shaffer said when more
information is available on this he will share it with the BTC. Terry asked
that this matter be made an agenda item.
Sigrin asked for a clarification as to what is covered by Public Official
Liability insurance. Terry said the intent of the letter from Berlin was to
make notice of what is not covered by this insurance, specifically, not
following the open meetings law. Shaffer said he would get this information.
Ehninger said that on the last Council shoot, the picture was grainy or
fuzzy. Blough noted "ghosting" on the screen when a camera moved. Continued
monitoring and working on Channel 29 by both Heritage and the City is
necessary to produce a satisfactory signal.
HERITAGE REPORT:
Madsen asked whether revenues for the franchise fee were what had been
projected in the budget. Blough said the figures had been very close. This
was for calendar year 1984. Madsen noted she had read in a Multichannel News
article that Heritage revenue and income had been significantly affected by
acquisition of four systems, and asked whether this and other Iowa systems
includedwere those u
but
thought those systemshadbeengWesternnGraves e
Ohio cable systems rather thanIowa
City, Muscatine, etc. Heritage is a general partner with 10% ownership in
the Iowa City system.
Terry noted that the BTC agenda would no longer include specific items for
groups such as the Library or Access Iowa City, to allow for more discussion
of Commission items. These groups may speak under Public Discussion or could
request an agenda item. Tiffany noted that Library items of interest to the
BTC included trying to diagnose the computer card catalog problems over long
distance telephone lines. Johnson asked whether disintegration of tapes is a
problem noticed by the Library. Tiffany said this is not a problem now.
NEW BUSINESS:
Terry stated that in view of Ehninger's new position as Vice -Chair, Twaler
would be the minute proof-reader for the BTC. Commission members expressed
their appreciation to Madsen for her work on behalf of the BTC. Madsen
thanked the Commissioners for their cooperation and kind words and wished the
BTC well in its further endeavors. Terry reminded all that no cable business
could be discussed during the potluck dinner which would follow the meeting.
001
Broadband Telecommunications Commission
March 13, 1985
Page 5
ADJOURNMENT:
Moved by Johnson, seconded by Sigrin to adjourn. Meeting adjourned at 5:40
p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
MINUTES
ANNUAL PROGRAMMING INPUT FORUM
BROADBAND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
MARCH 13, 1985, 7:00-9:00 P.M.
CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS
PRESENT: Terry, Ehninger, Sigrin, Johnson, Twaler, Madsen
ABSENT: None
EXCUSED: None
STAFF PRESENT: Shaffer, Stewart
OTHERS PRESENT: Calderon, Blough of Heritage. Twenty-one audience members
were seated at 7:00 p.m.
MEETING TO ORDER:
Terry brought the meeting to order at 7:03 p.m.
PUBLIC FORUM DISCUSSION:
Terry gave a brief welcome to those present and watching the telecast on ch.
29 and noted that a list of programs and channels available in Iowa City and
another of alternative programming options not currently offered by Heritage
on the Iowa City system was available at the front door. Selections from
this second list would be read during the meeting for the sale of viewers not
present in the Council Chambers. This information is also available from
Heritage Cablevision or Shaffer at the Iowa City Public Library.
Terry introduced the members of the BTC, Heritage representatives and staff
members who would participate in the meeting. Special recognition was given
to outgoing BTC member Jen Madsen with the presentation of a letter of
commendation from Mayor John McDonald and a plaque commemorating her work
during her six years on the Commission.
Terry noted that the meeting was being telecast live and that viewers with
questions or comments could call and have their concerns addressed by
Commission members or Heritage representatives. Johnson introduced some
audience members as part of his class from the University of Iowa. Johnson
gave a breakdown of what programming is available on Iowa City's cable
system, differentiating basic service, over -the -air -broadcast signals, pay
services and access channels.
Terry explained that programming received on the Iowa City.system is deliv-
ered by the SatCom 3R and Galaxy I sat..Ilites. Sigrin noted that these are
only two of dozens of satellites to choose from. Sigrin read from the list
of other satellite programming ostensibly available. Johnson also pointed
out that each satellite has many transponders, or channels, so that poten-
tially over 700 different programming services could be chosen.
Which program sources are selected and which are not is a function of public
response, Johnson said.
769
MINUTES
ANNUAL PROGRAMMING INPUT FORUM
BROADBAND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
MARCH 13, 1985, 7:00-9:00 P.M.
PAGE 2
Blough stated that Heritage is constantly in a position of evaluating
programming choices, and also considering what is preferred by the communi-
ties the company serves. Other criteria used in determining what programs to
offer are polls, surveys and letters from viewers. Economic viability and
source stability are also factors to be considered. Blough reported that a
petition had just been presented to him to obtain the Bravo! service for Iowa
Network were
both brought ltosthe pIowa aCity rts ssystem in response ervice. MTV and hto publNashville icinput, Blough
said.
Sigrin pointed out that marketing studies on programming choices are based on
national demographics rather than local. Two hundred people signed the
Bravo! petition, Sigrin said. Blough noted that Bravo! offers a similar type
of programming to that of the Arts 8 Entertainment Network, but a better
quality product. Johnson said people should be aware that when they ask for
a service, it may well be a pay service and they should know what the service
will cost them.
Terry stated that what is offered on which channels can be changed and that
is the purpose of the Annual Programming Input Forum; to give the public an
opportunity to express its opinion. Sigrin added that the public is also
encouraged to attend and participate in the monthly meetings of the BTC,
which are held the third Tuesday of each month at 8:00 a.m. in Council
Chambers. Johnson noted that the BTC had requested the company to run
samplers of.programming from the list of those services not currently offered
here, so that people could get an idea of what these programs are in 'order to
make informed choices. Blough said thatny one consideration the company has in
making programming choices is that maservices offered are not stable,
long-running entities, and by the time a choice is made to offer the pro-
grams, sometimes they are already gone. Blough did say, however, that
samplers of programming services could be run on Heritage's ch. 5 in the next
four to six weeks.
Terry pointed out that the Triannual Review Hearing, another public process
of evaluating the cable system, will take place within the next few months.
This hearing will be concerned with technical, financial service and other
aspects of the performance of the Iowa City system, as well as programming.
Sigrin made the point that cable was conceived as an alternative to conven-
tional d Iowa City
Cable atismtakes seriously
its
responsibility pen lines of communiconwiththe public in its
effort to keep viable that alternative.
Johnson noted to the public that if they were watching at home on March 13,
1985, thethey could call din�andrstate theiroown oin tquehe stionsrouiand the Council
about co
come and able in
Iowa City.
Doug Allaire addressed the Commission from the audience regarding editing
equipment problems at the Community Programming Center. Calderon responded
with an explanation of what the company is doing to try to correct those
on commented on franchise requirements pertaining
problems. Terry and Johns
tothe
company
itionrespAoncablerilitviewin9to eatahomll e asked twhat mprogramming nwould
%Ze
MINUTES
ANNUAL PROGRAMMING INPUT FORUM
BROADBANDTELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
MARCH 13, 1985, 7:00-9:00 P.M.
PAGE 3
replace the outgoing Sportstime. This caller also expressed pleasure at the
inclusion of the Disney Channel but complained about the advertising crawl on
the Weather
Channel, and
the aske
ed that
the current conditions of the weather be
put
Blough said a firm decision had not yet been made on a replacement for
Sportstime. The advertising on the Weather Channel is an experimental thing
and may or may not continue. Terry said the services that had been acquired
recently in response S ) and the Nashvilleic -input ethe Network. Disney ough describedthe
International Network (SING,
programming on the Disney Channel and explained that major feature films from
Disney Productions such as Fantasia, Snow White and Bambi are not included in
the program offerings because they are still successful box office attrac-
tions. It is hoped that eventually these too, will be available on the
channel.
Scott Buchanan spoke from the audience in regard to the transfer of the
franchise. Specifically, Buchanan's question centered on the BTC's reconmen-
dation to City Council regarding municipal or cooperative versus commercial
inn the imatteraffeBuchanan asked stated the the BTC not
tomade
outlineotheir recommendationreasons for not
making a recommendation. Shaffer_ said She Councer il had m d eadits decision
based in part on a report prepared by
es and
rneh ownership Buchanan summarized
ec,tdevlopmentsin cable and asked whether the BCmight like
to have the opportunity to reconsider ownership options for the Iowa City
cable system. le
ed
Madsen responded that
son
law oatththe e time cent cable
BTC �considered slation chthe n matter not
transfewas not by anymeans could
outcanerwouldtbe ofbthatrlegislati legislation. Indeed, compromisestwere tstill bedne
ing
the final
eleventh
ur
lt
orresponsible tb given atthe
hoh
information hadatTt eetime
aj ,aMadsendsaid.
as come
he
ws
madeson the transferfwouldiwhich
alterhishview of the matter. Johnson decision
alsosaid
thit is hisouncil
ven
the
matter the fceeling that onsiderat on eithshould have-er the this was sion nor the
sOapositionat the
time and still is his position. Johnson would have preferred a municipal or
cooperative ownership arrangement.
Terry stted that ect
an
three or afour meetings cof sthe BTC and that it was da conscious decision h
sionnot
allow
make a recommendation but rather to give the Council
it their
unfairs todsecond
the Council to make its own decision. Terry
guess the decision now in light of what has since become law. Buchanan
stated that he was attempting to gain an admission from the Commission that
at she
in
memberad been a
�ofeantearly acable commission
thetawhich tennyears agoerecommended hh
municipal
ownership.
70
MINUTES
ANNUAL PROGRAMMING INPUT FORUM
BROADBAND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
MARCH 13, 1985, 7:00-9:00 P.M.
PAGE 4
Johnson pointed out that the Commission is not in a position 'to right all
the wrongs" of the cable company so viewers should not think that the
Commission has dictatorial powers. Sigrin also noted that the BTC is an
advisory body made up of individuals with very diverse viewpoints who,
although they might with to make unanimous decisions, don't always do so.
Sigrin said he also favored municipal ownership.
One of the best things to come out of the transfer of the franchise, Sigrin
said, is the transfer of the operation of public access channel 26 from the
company to a non-profit corporation. Sigrin said although the members of the
Commission take a great deal of time to study cable issues, that without
meaningful community input the BTC has little clout. Madsen added that as a
result of some of the inclusions in the cable act, such as rate regulation,
cities may a involved in many court cases. Issues will be brought to the
attention of Congress because many of the stipulations are not going to work
in the way the act intended, Madsen said. Terry said the company is a free
enterprise but must still be responsive to community needs.
Stewart relayed a question from a caller asking whether Blough anticipated
adding any new 24-hour video music channels to the program line-up and what
other programning services might be added this summer. Blough said that
programming choices are becoming more difficult to make since there is very
little viable programming which is unique. Many of the available choices are
very similar to programming already available on the system. The next
programming decisions will be critical, Blough said. The first decision will
be to replace Sportstime. After that, considerations of limited channel
capacity and competition of services come into play. Virtually all types of
programming are already represented on the system, Blough said.
Another caller asked Blough to explain how she could use her new cable ready
TV set to watch the Disney Channel and avoid using the channel selector box.
Unfortunately,blough said, she can't. Blough explained that since Disney is
a pay service, in order to secure.t6 signal from those who might try to
obtain the service illegally, that is without paying for it, the video signal
is scrambled. To unscramble it, the selector box and an A/B switch are
necessary. However, Blough said, this is only true with regard to Disney.
For all other channels, the cable ready set will function fine.
Dwight Brooks, an audience member, asked what public notice of this meeting
had been given and whether the company had any plans to add the Black
Entertainment Network to the program line-up. Ehninger said notices had been
placed in the Press -Citizen and Daily Iowan. The local cable channels were
also utilized, Terry said. Madsen said the BTC had always suffered from a
lack of media interest in its public forums. In other years, Madsen said, a
lot of people had come in response to an interest in access. If people are
interested, they will come, Madsen said, and both the BTC and Shaffer's
office are always looking for ways to get more people involved.
Brooks said he is involved in circulating a petition to obtain the Black
Entertainment service and currently has 75 signatures. Brooks asked what the
company would consider a significant enough number of signatures to precipi-
tate obtaining this service. Blough said he could not give a definite
number, but that if such a petition is presented, it will not fall on deaf
769
MINUTES
ANNUAL PROGRAMMING INPUT FORUM
BROADBAND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
MARCH 1.3, 1985, 7:00-9:00 P.M.
PAGE 5
ears. Johnson noted that the Black Entertainment Network is on Galaxy 1,
which is a satellite that the company gets, and has 7.7 million subscribers
nationally, making it the sixth largest programming service in the country
despite the fact that many of the large urban areas, where the majority of
the black population lives, are still not wired. Brooks asked about the
possibility of using the cable company's billing to conduct a poll as a means
of getting more direct feedback. Madsen noted that the BTC had not been
approached before regarding the Black Entertainment service, so Brooks'
comments would serve to alert both the BTC and the company to an interest in
the community in this service and help to get the ball rolling.
Sigrin said that people who are interested in additional programming have to
consider that this system is operated by a private contractor and the bottom
line is most important to the company, and as such, programming changes are
often based on the profit motive.
Blough outlined the company's EEO (Equal Opportunity Employer) efforts. The
FCC, Blough said, is now determining what is going to be required of the
cable industry in terms of procedural aspects and record keeping. In the
past, under American Telecommunications Corporation and now under Heritage,
the local cable company has been a full equal opportunity company, Blough
said.
In response to a phone caller, Shaffer said this program would be rebroadcast
this Saturday, March 17, beginning in the morning and would play throughout
the day, and again the following week. Scott Buchanan noted that he had not
heard a definitive answer to Brooks' question regarding use of the billing
system for polling viewers. Blough replied that an inert could be placed in
the billing envelope but that mailing cost would be a factor in such a use.
Calderon explained the operation of the Community Programming Center; how it
is staffed, its functions, goals and objectives under cable company manage-
ment, and also described the grants available to community producers through
the Community Programming Grant Committee, first funded by previous franchise
holder, American Telecommunications Corporation (ATC). Ehninger added that
the process of turning over management of the CPC to a non-profit corporation
is in its beginning stages. The first phase of this process is to select a
consultant to help the City draw up a Request for Proposals (RFP). Inter-
ested parties will then present their proposals to the City for evaluation.
Sigrin described the access channels and their supervising agencies and
explained that it was felt that the public access channel 26 should be
programmed and operated under the auspices of a non-profit organization since
it is the public channel. There are distinct differences, Sigrin said,
between the operation of that channel by a private, profit-making entity and
a public non-profit orientation. Sigrin noted that Heritage has recently
produced a brochure to be used as an outreach tool for access. The Community
Programming Guidelines have also recently been updated, Sigrin said, in an
effort to attract ore individuals who may be interested in producing their
own programs for the access channels.
%Ia f
MINUTES
ANNUAL PROGRAMMING INPUT FORUM
BROADBAND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
MARCH 13, 1985, 7:00-9:00 P.M.
PAGE 6
Shaffer said programming had been produced by groups and individuals of all
ages in the community including senior citizens, youth groups, teachers,
musicians and more. Types of programming produced include talk shows,
religious, entertainment and educational programs, and fiction to name just a
few.
At Terry's request, Cinda Stewart described the functions, goals and objec-
tives of the public access support group, Access Iowa City, which represents
the interests of the public by helping to provide the BTC with information on
what people in the community are thinking in terms of access, by attempting
to focus the interest of the public on their rights and opportunities in
access. Access Iowa City holds an annual spaghetti dinner to focus attention
on access issues and programming. This year's event will be April 26 at 10
S. Gilbert St.
Jim Allison of the audience noted that he experienced interference from the
airport on his television set when watching Cinemax. Calderon asked if any
j of Allison's neighbors have this problem. Blough described some measures
which might be taken to alleviate the interference and invited Allison to
I contact him at his office and he would take care of the problem.
1 Terry described the procedure to follow whenever a viewer has problems with
I! his cable service, of either technical programming or billing nature.
ADJOURNMENT:
Terry thanked the Commissioners, the staff and public who attended and
participated in tonight's forum. Johnson moved and Sigrin seconded the
meeting adjourn. Motion received unanimous approval. Meeting adjourned at
8:55 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
I
Wm. UreYShaffer
Broadband Telecomm 'cations Specialist
70
MINUTES
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
APRIL 18, 1985 - 7:30 PM
CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS
MEMBERS PRESENT: Courtney, Blank, Jakobsen, Jordan, Perry, Scott
MEMBERS ABSENT: Horowitz
STAFF PRESENT: Beagle, Boyle, Franklin, Milkman, Manning
CALL TO ORDER:
Chairperson Scott called'the meeting to order at 7:35 p.m.
CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES OF MARCH 7. 1985:
Scott amended the minutes on page 5, under Conmission Discussion, second
paragraph, sixth line, to read "reminded the Commission" instead of
"suggested." Also on page six, Scott amended the minutes by ending the
last sentence "agreement," and striking the rest (... and will
talk... League.)
Jakobsen moved to approve the minutes of March 7, 1985, c, amended. Perry
seconded the motion. The motion carried 4-0-2. Jordan and Blank
abstained.
RECOMMENDATIONS TO CITY COUNCIL:
1. S-8505. Recommend approval ,of an application submitted by Windsor
Land Corp. for an amendment to the preliminary and final Large Scale
Non -Residential Development Plan for Eastdale Mall Addition located at
1700 First Avenue.
2. S-8506. Recommend approval of an application submitted by Paul M.
Kennedy for final plat approval of Kennedy's Waterfront Addition, Part
2, located west of Gilbert St.., south of Stevens Drive.
3. S-8507. Recommend repeal of the PDH plan for Hunters Run Subdivision
Parts 2 and 3.
i Recommend consent to the vacation of Lots 50-53 Hunters Run Subdivi-
sion Part 3.
Recommend approval of the preliminary and final subdivision plat of
Lots 52 and 53 and portions of Lots 50 and 51 of Hunters Run Subdivi-
sion Part 3 with a waiver of preliminary platting requirements.
4. It was unanimously decided that the Connission would not discuss an
amendment to the sign regulation concerning sign area determination
for free standing signs, since this regulation had been adequately
discussed previously.
PUBLIC DISCUSSION OF ANY ITEM NOT INCLUDED ON THE AGENDA:
There was no public discussion of any item not included on the agenda.
70
Planning d Zoning Commission
April 18, 1985 - 7:30 PM
Page 2
SUBDIVISION ITEMS:
S-8504. Public discussion of an application submitted by Hallmark
Homes, Inc., Laren Hershberger, . President, for preliminary
plat/planned development housing plan approval of Vista Park Village
located between Peterson Street and Scott Blvd., south of Court
Street; 45 -day limitation period: April 20, 1985.
Beagle explained that Hershberger is interested in establishing a 30
lot subdivision of single family homes. Each unit is situated on its
own private lot. Vista Park Village will consist of private streets
and common open space which will become the responsibility of the
Homeowners Association. The lot area averages 8,266 square feet in
size with deletion of the area of the street right-of-way. The open
spaces include a triangular shaped lot located at the southern end of
the development , and a "tot -lot" located within the development. A
private looped street is proposed having a right-of-way width of 50
feet and a pavement width of 25 feet. After review by the Engineering
Department, it was agreed that it would be permissible to allow
parking along one side of the street. The development is within the
Phase 3, short range development plans of the Comprehensive Plan.
With the intersection of Peterson Street and the proposed development
private access, the Engineering -Department feels a T -intersection is
more appropriate. The project design is in response to market demand.
Hershberger is attempting to provide affordable housing within a
single-family detached neighborhood to primarily serve first time home
buyers.
The staff recommends deferral at this time with the applicant being
directed to submit a revised plan addressing the following concerns:
1. Vegetative Buffer: Scott Boulevard is a major arterial street and
will eventually serve as a transportation link between 80I
Industrial Park to the south and Interstate 80. As such a
vegetative buffer, or other alternative, is needed to mitigate the
negative impacts associated with heavy vehicular traffic along
Scott Boulevard on those homes that back on to that street.
2. Proposed Intersections: The Engineering Department has expressed
a concern with regard to the proposed intersection of the private
access drive into the development with Peterson Street. The
Engineering staff feels a T -intersection is more appropriate and
will minimize potential traffic conflicts at the intersection of
Peterson, Arbor and the private access drives.
ed as
3. Common Open
common open Sspace representpace: The s landrearea
which wasleft eover rafter
streetsallocation of dhome sites. s
all
parcels are not accessibleto the majority ofresidenthese
tswithin Tthe
development and could potentially result in them not being used or
maintained. In addition, the smaller "tot lot" sized lot within
this homes Swhi�
chwill be sion usu jectedld eto the nuisancefactor
that o Could potentially
770
Planning 8 Zoning Commission
April 18, 1985 - 7:30 PM
Page 3
be produced by children playing in such a small area. It is
staff's suggestion that the smaller tot size lot be converted into
a residential home site.
4. Parking: Due to the small lot sizes, the area for parking
au�wideriles in drivewaye andnt of a 25 thegarage
paved sstreet it wasited. With
felt that
parking provided along one side of the street would be adequate.
So as to indicate that on -street parking is being provided, staff
recommends that the parking arrangement be identified on the plan
and that it be stipulated that parking is only permitted along one
side of the street.
S. Street Standards: A conflict may exist if City services are
provided to this development and adequate construction standards
are not given proper consideration in the design of the private
street. As such, it is staff's recommendation that the 6" P.C.C.
surface be accepted, however, that the subgrade material and
requiredsforsthe private street uired for blic and beososnotedsonutheoalso be
plan.
6. Housing Design: The applicant has submitted a house elevation and
interior floor plan which is not consistent with the size or type
of homes identified on the plan. At least 5 or 6 different
housing patterns are identified on the plan and therefore eleva
tions to these structures and interior floor plans should be
provided. This provision is in accordance with requirements of
the Zoning Ordinance.
Beagle added that a waiver to the 45 -day limitation period would need
to be submitted.
COMMISSION DISCUSSION:
Perry suggested it might be better to wait for the lifting of the
moratorium on east side development.
PUBLIC DISCUSSION:
Larry Schnittjer, 465 Hwy 1 'd., Iowa City, Iowa. Representing
Hershoe_
rger, Scnnitijer clarified the following issues:
- Parking. will be on the south and west side of the street.
- A revised site plan will be submitted.
- The subgrade will be to City of Iowa City standards.
The proposed "tot -lot" can become another unit.
- Sidewalks. Not sure of this action yet, a possible backyard
system is proposed.
Scott noted that a waiver to the 45 -day limitation period was received
on behalf of the developer, Hallmark Homes, Inc.
770
Planning 8 Zoning Commission
April 18, 1985 - 7:30 PM
Page 4
Scott
regardingsotheoted requ st tfrom letter
Jehle, received
Frie dshipsSt9reet, concerns
City, Iowa.
Jakobsen questioned staff concerning the zoning. ?eagle replied that
it is for POH 5. In response to this answer, Jakobsen asked what
would happen if the zoning were changed to POH 8. She suggested that
this could allow an increased right-of-way and eliminate a problem.
Schnittjer explained to Jakobsen that a conventional right-of-way
would take space away from the front yards of the lots. Scott added
that the change in zoning would increase density. Schnittjer replied
that the increase in density would be no problem., but the 50'
right-of-way would. There would not be enough depth from one side to
the other for sidewalk, parking, etc. Jordan stated he was hesitant
about the backyard sidewalk adding there was less privacy.
Returning to the subject of the right-of-way, Jakobsen commented that
anything less than standard right-of-way has always come back to haunt
the commission. Perry agreed with Jakobsen and added that the
increase in density is not a good idea, but he still held that the
uniqueness of the subdivision is important. Perry felt the applica-
tion should be deferred for'the next meeting to allow time to examine
other options.
RodneSchultz, 6 Arbor Circle, Iowa City, Iowa. Schultz expressed
ne concerns of people in the area. Issues included: density (number
of homes), the area of activity - traffic flow, and the type of homes
to be built, as well as its effect on homes in the area.
Scott explained that single family structures were proposed.
Schultz felt thirty homes were a large amount for the area. To this
Scott replied that it still allows 8,000 sq. ft. per unit. This is
the lowest density (RS -5) for residential development in Iowa City.
Schultz questioned the impact the development would have on the
property values of present homes. Scott said he would not answer
that. Schultz also asked about the change from POH 5 to POH 8, and
those implications. Jakobsen clarified that she suggested it only as
a means to increase the right-of-way from 25' to 50', to meet city
standards. The zoning is a PDH, therefore, in being innovative, the
developer must still meet the concerns of the area.
Schultz stated one more concern with the claimed market demand,
stating
does notrseere numerous that there is a Sale need for this thisl City, and
development.
Perry moved to defer item S-8504, an application submitted by Hallmark
Homes, Inc., for preliminary plat/planned development housing plan
approval of Vista Park Village located between Peterson Street and
Scott Boulevard, south of Court Street until the May 2, 1985 formal
meeting. Jordan seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously,
6-0.
770
Planning & Zoning Commission
April 18, 1985 - 7:30 PM
Page 5
2. S-8505. Public discussion of an application submitted by Windsor Land
Corporation for approval of an amendment to the preliminary and final
Large Scale Non -Residential Development Plan for Eastdale Mall
Addition located at 1700 First Avenue; 45 -day limitation period: May
13, 1985.
Milkman explained the original LSNRD plan for Eastdale Mall was
approved in 1976, and an amendment in February of 1978. At that time,
the concept of the mall was for a pedestrian -oriented area, the
proposed amendment creates more of a two part concept. The proposed
amendment to the LSNRD plan makes the following changes:
1. The concept of a unified pedestrian -oriented mall has been
abandoned.
2. The existing building will become a commercial condominium with
continued retail use.
3. The dimensions of Lot 1 have been changed slightly to provide
additional parking in what was the pedestrian mall area.
4. Lot 6 will be used for parking. Total parking is increased from
292 to 348 spaces.
5. The pedestrian mall between Lots 1, 2, 3, and 7, 8, and 9, will
become a fire lane/walkway with 12 -foot paving to permit access of
fire equipment.
6. Businesses on Lots 1, 2, 3, 7, 8, and 9 will be oriented outward
(toward First Avenue and Procter & Gamble) rather than inward to
the original pedestrian mall.
The amended LSNRD for Lots 11 and 6 complies with the provisions of
the Zoning Ordinance with the exception of the tree planting require-
ments. The original plan was. partially implemented and staff feels
the applicant has tried to comply with the existing tree regulations
to the extent possible in the revised tree planting plan submitted.
The staff recommendation suggested deferral pending submission of a
tree planting plan and discussion of the changed mall concept.
Blank moved to approve the application submitted by Windsor Land Corp.
for approval of an amendment to 'the preliminary and final Large Scale
I Development Plan for Eastdale Mall Addition located at
1700 First Avenue. Courtney seconded the motion. The motion carried
unanimously, 6-0.
3. S-8506. Public discussion of an application submitted by Paul M.
Kennedy for final plat approval of Kennedy's Waterfront Addition, Part
2, located west of Gilbert Street, south of Stevens Drive; 45 -day
limitation period: May 16, 1985; 60 -day limitation period: May 31,
1985.
77J
Planning 8 Zoning Commission
April 18, 1985 - 7:30 PM
Page 6
Scott asked staff if all legal papers have been received. Boyle
answered that they have been received, and preliminary review indi-
cated that they are in order.
Staff recommends approval of the final plat of Kennedy's 'Waterfront
Addition, Part 2, subject to the following:
- That the subdivider's Agreement include a statement specifying that
no portion of Lot 5, as shown on the preliminary plat, shall be
improved until a stormwater management plan is submitted for the
entire 10.3 acre subdivision.
- That the subdivider 's Agreement also stipulates that no building
permit shall be issued for Lot 5, as shown on the preliminary plat,
unless and until said lot has been finally platted and/or an LSNRD
plan approved.
Boyle stated that the legal papers included these stiuplations.
Jakobsen moved to approve the application submitted by Paul M. Kennedy
for final plat approval of Kennedy's 'Waterfront Addition, Part 2,
located west of Gilbert Street, south of Stevens Drive. Perry
seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously, 6-0.
4. S-8507. Public discussion of an application submitted by Hunters Run
Development Company for consent to the vacation of Lots 50-53 of
Hunters Run Subdivision Part 3 and approval of the repeal of the
Planned Development Housing Plan for Hunters Run Subdivision Parts 2
and 3, and the preliminary and final subdivision plat for the resub-
division of Lots 52 and 53 and portions of Lots 50 and 51 of Hunters
Run Subdivision Part 1; 45 -day limitation period: May 20, 1985.
Milkman stated that to change the original PDN plan into a single-
family subdivision, the applicant needs to vacate lots 50-53 of Part 3
of the subdivision and repeal the PDH Plan for both Part 3 and Part 2
of the subdivision. The rear portion of Lots 50 and 51 will be sliced
off and eventually become part of Part 5 of the subdivision. Lots
50-53 will then be resubdivided into 10 lots as shown on the subdivi-
sion plat.
Staff recommends consent of the vacation of Lots 50-53 Hunters Run
Subdivision Part 3, and approval of the preliminary and final subdivi-
sion plat of Lots 52 and 53 and portions of Lots 50 and 51 of Hunters
Run Subdivision Part 3 with a waiver of preliminary platting require-
ments,and the repeal of the PDH plan for Hunters Run Subdivision Parts
2 and 3.
Jakobsen moved to repeal the POH plan for Hunters Run Subdivision
Parts 2 and 3. Blank seconded the motion. The motion carried,
unanimously, 6-0.
Jakobsen moved to consent to the vacation of Lots 50-53 Hunters Run
Subdivision Part 3. Jordan seconded the motion. The motion carried
unanimously, 6-0.
770
Planning b Zoning Commission
April 18, 1985 - 7:30 PM
Page 7
Jakobsen moved to recommend approval of the preliminary and final sub-
division plat of Lots 52 and 53 and portions of Lots 50 and 51 of
Hunters Run Subdivision Part 3 with a waiver of preliminary platting
requirements. Perry seconded the motion. The motion carried unani-
mously,. 6-0.
OTHER BUSINESS:
1. Discussion of an amendment to the sign regulation concerning sign area
determination for free standing signs.
Jakobsen moved not to discuss the amendment. Jordan seconded the
motion.
Scott commented that this action indicates that the Commission feels
that the amendment has been adequately discussed previously.
The motion carried unanimously, 6-0.
2. Planning and Zoning Commission information.
Franklin informed the Commission the State Legislature had passed,
effective July 1, 1985, a bill -allowing a city to impose conditions
prior to public hearing an any rezoning or ordinance to approve a
development plan. This gives the power of contract/conditional zoning
to the city if it is reasonable and there is a public need.
3. Discussion of vacation of an east/west alley between Washington Street
and College Street north of the U -Smash -Em building, and the rezoning
of a portion of the Chauncey Swan parking lot generally described as
an area south of 'Washington Street to the bus depot building and east
of Gilbert Street, from P to CB -2 for subsidized elderly housing.
Douglas Boothroy, Director of H.I.S., explained to the Commission that
Tuesday night (April 16th) the City Council was asked to entertain a
request for elderly subsidized housing. Boothroy wanted to make the
Commission aware that the issue will come before them in the near
future. There is the possible vacation of an alley involved as well
as rezoning the land from public to CB -2.
Scott asked Boothroy to clarify the area. Boothroy described the area
near the bus station. The proposed structure would hold 75 units, and
possibly be ten stories high. 38 parking spaces would be needed;
there are presently 17 parking spaces in the area to be rezoned. The
others would be either to the south or underneath the structure.
Ecumenical Housing needs to turn in an application for funding to HUD
before mid-May, therefore, the Commission may have to look at a
rezoning request for the area prior to that.
Scott questioned the number of parking spaces in the present Ecumeni-
cal Lot. Boothroy thought it was around 80 spaces. Scott expressed
the problems in parking that they have had. Courtney agreed that it
was important to stress the problem of parking.
774
Planning 8 Zoning Commission
April 18, 1985 - 7:30 PM
Page 8
Jakobsen asked staff was what going on at Ridge Road and Whiting. She had
received calls concerning the area. Franklin stated that the owner had
been doing some grading in the area.
i
� With her last term on the Planning and Zoning Commission ending tonight,
I Jane Jakobsen was presented a certificate of appreciation by Chairperson
i Scott on behalf of the Commission and staff. Jane wished luck to the
remaining Commissioners, stating that the issues and problems that they
face are becoming more difficult, more complex.
j Jakobsen moved to adjourn. Courtney seconded the motion. The motion
carried unanimously, 6-0.
ZA
i II arrel Courtney, Se Lary
Minutes taken by Linda Manning
770
OM
MINUTES
IOWA CITY PUBLIC LIBRARY
BOARD OF TRUSTEES
REGULAR MEETING
THURSDAY, APRIL 2 5, 1985
4:00 PM ADMINISTRATIVE CONFERENCE ROOM
MEMBERS PRESENT: Cavitt, Drum, Lyman, Pegnetter, Willis
MEMBERS ABSENT: Bovbjerg, Grimes, Grifsch, Zastrow
STAFF PRESENT: Eggers, Tiffany, Jehle, Craig
OTHERS PRESENT: Pat Forsythe, Foundation Executive Director; Larry
Baker, Iowa City Council member, Practicum students:
Jeff Dick and Kim McAndrews; University of Iowa politi-
cal science students
President Cavitt called the meeting to order at 4:05 PM. Minutes of the
Regular Meeting of March 28, 1985 were approved. Willis/Drum. The
Director and the Board reviewed the Third Quarter Gifts and Bequests
Report and the FY85 budget. Disbursements of April 1 and April 15, 1985
were approved. Drum/Willis.
The Director reported on the following:
1. Very conservative use of the FY85 budget for temporary employees this
year has allowed us to put a third person at the check-out desk on
weekends since February and to complete several special projects this
last quarter.
2. Congratulations should be given to staff members Jeanette Carter and
Carol Spaziani for their ideas on reorganizing the distribution of
income tax forms at ICPL. The third quarter report describes both the
effectiveness and the savings to the library from this revised
system.
3. Kirkwood College has contacted us about the possibility of buying into
a computer system in order to provide an on-line catalog for their
library. The idea will be discussed further and brought to the Board
for a decision if the idea has merit.
4. All applicants for Library Board openings should turn in new applica-
tions to the City Clerk by May 17 so that they can be duplicated and
sent to the City Council for a decision on May 21. Anyone who
contacts the library is given the job description for being a Library
Trustee as well as the application form.
5. There was a full house at the FRIENDS annual meeting on April 16. Both
the Nation of Readers photo contest and the speakers on "Books That
Made A Difference" drew a large and interested audience. The latter
segment will be re-cablecast on Channel 20 on May 6, 10, and 29, and
June 1, 11 and 17.
6. Several staff members attended the Iowa Library Association district
meeting in Cedar Rapids, April 24. As President of the Iowa Trustees
Association, Board member Ed Zastrow attended all seven district
77/
Board of Trustees
April 25, 1985
Page 2
meetings to introduce the new trustee handbook. The handbook as well
as the proposals for public library standards and for certification of
libraries will be reviewed at the May Board meeting.
As a follow-up to the pre -meeting tour of the Cable TV Community Program-
ming Center and a review of the new Heritage brochure explaining the
services and goals of the center, the Board adopted a motion about their
intent concerning future management of the cable access facilities. The
motion authorized the staff to prepare a proposal for the Board's consid-
eration when a Request for Proposal is received regarding the choice of a
non-profit corporation (NPO) to operate the local cable access facilities.
Should the Library be chosen as the NPO, acceptance would be contingent
Comnunications,ate localucable system ownlevel er. proviLyman/Willded is. Unanimous.Heritage
President Cavitt appointed two committees. The Nominating Committee, Ed
Zastrow, Chair, plus Drum and Gritsch will present a slate of FY86
officers for election at the regular June meeting. Nancy Willis will
chair a committee for the annual evaluation of the Director. Other
members are Riley Grimes and Ed Zastrow.
Cavitt announced that as chair of the Foundation residential campaign she
was pleased with the results of the telephone drive held April 17 and 18.
The combination of letters and calls raised an estimated $6,000. Pledges
so far from Library Board members for the Centennial Endowment fund total
$5,7001
The Board completed their review of the Smoking/Food/Beverage policy
started last month with the decision to ban smoking in the library by
adatinthe ers
reported thatpnoncas smokingpsigns ted. and symbolsPhavettUnanimous.
ordered. Temporary
signs announcing the new no smoking policy will go up May 1.
Assistant Director Connie Tiffany reviewed some of the issues addressed in
the proposed Viewing and Listening Policy. The issue of copyright related
to the viewing of films in the library was addressed in the last issue of
the Iowa Library Quarterly, including an article by ICPL staff member
Dewey McGuire. Eggers explained that most of the components of the policy
are already Board policy or administrative rules which are merely gathered
together for the first time in this policy statement. The policy was
adopted. Pegnetter/Drum. Unanimous.
Proposed revisions to the Materials Selection policy were reviewed. There
was some discussion on why the computer software collection would ini-
tially
manylof itheucha programs
s9rreflectrtheechanged le Ile.
prioritiesrdevelopedexplained
the
Board's five year plan or gradual changes in the collection which have
developed since the last revision in 1980. The policy was adopted as
proposed. Lyman/Pegnetter.
sed five
There were no questionsabout
out the adjrd ustmentsuarter rinort or the FY86 eplanirequired
year plan. Tiffany pointed
by the failure to get additional staffing in FY86.
271
0
Board of Trustees
April 25, 1985
Page 3
The third quarter of the Gifts and Bequests Fund showed an unencumbered
balance of $16,845. Based on that balance and on Eggers report that
$13,000 in unencumbered income can be expected in FY86, the Board agreed
to allocate $13,000 from the fund for the FY86 materials budget.
The meeting was adjourned at 5:30 PM.
L/
4ol, o a n h e, eco ders
771
MINUTES
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
WEDNESDAY, APRIL 10, 1985 - 7:30 P.M.
IOWA CITY PUBLIC LIBRARY - R0014 B
i
MEMBERS PRESENT: Hayes, Vanderwoude, Perry, Wagner, Champion, Noywsz
MEMBERS ABSEiIT: Janes
STAFF PRESENT: Moen, Chandler
GUESTS PRESENT: Valerie Barkley, Kim Dittmer
RECOM14ENDATIONS TO COUNCIL:
-18, 1985, as Preservation Week in Iowa City.
1. Proclaim the week of May 12
2. Consider the concerns of the Historic Preservation Commission in regard
to the Iowa -Illinois Gas & Electric Company ordinances and their impact
on historic buildings and neighborhoods:
(a) Brick streets are not adequately protected from asphalt or concrete
patches,
(b) Transmission lines should be located away from historic buildings
and neighborhoods, and
(c) The qualities and character of historic buildings should be consid-
ered when utility boxes and meters are fastened to the exterior of
buildings.
CALL TO ORDER:
Chairman Nowysz called the meeting to order at 7:36 p.m.
APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 13, 1985:
Hayes moved approval of the minutes of February 13, 1985. Vanderwoude
seconded the motion. The motion carried uranimously.
PUBLIC DISCUSSION/COMMISSIONERS' REPORTS:
Public Discussion:
There was no public discussion.
Commissioners' Reports:
Nowysz welcomed Wagner and Champion, new members to the Commission, and
j briefly explained the goals and objectives of the Historic Preservation
Commission. She added that the primary purpose of the Commission was to find
t the value of promoting historic preservation
ways to educate the public abou
and the various means of accomplishing such goals.
77-2—
k
i
7.Z—
i ■
Historic Preservation Commission
April 10, 1985
Page 2
Hayes indicated he would defer to Moen for a report on the preparations for
the "Run for Preservation," noting that it was on the agenda for discussion
later in the meeting.
Moen noted the inclusion of an article about the street naming policy in the
members' packet and explained that while it would be on the May agenda, it
was being brought to their attention at this time to elicit comment and to
provide the memoers an opportunity to give the topic some consideration. She
explained how previous attempts to create continuity to the names of streets
had fared.
Perry noted that the topic of street names had come up in the Planning and
Zoning Commission when they were giving consideration to the Hickory Trails
area. He added that many of the Planning and Zoning members had reservations
about imposing rules on the developers or the community to mandate the naming
of streets. He noted that suggestions to establish certain themes sounded
good to him as long as they were suggestions only. Wagner wondered who would
have the final authority to choose the names. Moen indicated the developers
could continue to select the names as they do now. She added that it would
be possible to have a list prepared by this Commission from which the
developers could select names. Such a list would suggest continuation of the
type of theme areas currently used in certain parts of the city and would
give the developers a source of ideas that could encourage names that are
more imaginative and less standard in nature.
Perry wondered if the idea of theme names could cause problems by imposing
names on an area that, due to certain characteristics of the area, are
inappropriate. Nowysz suggested that sort of thing could be avoided if the
Commission recommended that the list be used as a guide to enhance the range
of names available rather than as a mandate that had to be used -at the
expense of the developer's own imagination. Perry stated that he liked that
kind of recommendation.
Nowsyz entertained a motion to take up item H on the agenda - update of the
Run for Preservation. Perry so moved. Vanderwoude seconded the motion. The
motion carried unanimously.
UPDATE OF THE "RUN FOR PRESERVATION":
Moen explained the history of the Run for Preservation for the new members
and noted that S500 had been suggested as a budget for hiring a run,
organizer. She passed out an example of the budget for a larger, more
organized run noting that any run would have to include expenses and fees to
cover T-shirts, publicity, police assistance, phone bills, and supplies. She
added that it would be unreasonable to expect entry fees to cover all of the
expenses, creating a need for sponsors of some kind, plus a good collection
of volunteers. Nowsyz stated that the local chapter of the American Insti-
tute of Architects is an agreeable source of volunteers.
Hayes said he had talked to John Corrigan who may be involved in the planning
and organizing and suggested that he (Hayes) and Moen should meet with him to
discuss the project.
7 %-2—
Historic Preservation Commission
Aoril 10, 1985
Page 3
Wagner asked what the date of the run was. Moen replied that the Commission
was probably talking about an event that was a year away. Perry cautioned
the Commission that any project like this was a major undertaking. Nowysz
suggested that the Commission secure the help of the sororities and fraterni-
ties at the University of Iowa. Hayes interjected that Corrigan was adept at
arranging that kind of support. He added that after meeting with Corrigan, a
presentation to the Commission might be in order. Nowysz noted that if it was
to be next spring then it would be a good idea to set a date. Hayes sug-
gested late April. Wagner said Sunday is the best day because there are
fewer conflicts. Nowysz suggested the 20th of April unless someone objected.
Hayes left at 8:bO p.m.
DISCUSSI011 OF JOHNSON COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY GARAGE SALE:
Moen distributed and explained the memo on the Johnson County Historic
Society spring sale, noting that individual members can partake or the
Commission could sell items with the proceeds to go to the Historic Preser-
vation Commission. Nowysz noted that the sale is a good opportunity to meet
members of the Historical Society. Moen added that the Historical Society is
contemplating running a refreshment stand at the Junior Olympics and wished
to encourage this group's participation. There was a general agreement that
the Commission would like to participate.
DISCUSSION OF NATIOIIAL PRESERVATION WEEK:
Moen indicated that the theme for Preservation Week this year is "The
Action's Back on Main Street." Moen explained the Main Street program noting
that until recently it benefitted cities under 50,000 in population. She
further explained that local attempts to promote historic preservation will
include a display of the 1984 Historic Preservation Award winners at the
library during May and asked if the Commission would consider a recommenda-
tion to have the Mayor proclaim the week of May 12-18 as Historic Preserva-
tion Week. Nowysz agreed that would be proper. VarderWoude moved that the
Historic Preservation Commission recommend to the Mayor that May 12-18, 1985,
be proclaimed Historic Preservation Week in Iowa City. Champion seconded the
motion. The motion passed unanimously.
Champion asked if this Commission had any funds to pursue projects. Moen
i responded that funds are very limited. Nowysz noted that the "Run for
Historic Preservation" was proposed to generate some money that could be used
for public information costs.
Perry asked who put together the Historic Preservation Award winners display.
Moen replied that the staff puts it together. Nowysz stated that it gener-
ates a lot of interest. Perry wondered if it was possible to show it in the
mall. Moen noted that it was a portable display and display in the mall was
a good idea.
Moen stated that the Historic Preservation Commission has recommended
recognition of srmeone for their contribution to historic preservation
efforts every year and wondered if the Commission wanted to do it again this
%Z
Historic Preservation Commission
April 10, 1985
Page 4
year. Wagner moved that Irving Weber be recommended for recognition as this
year's recipient of the honor. Vanderwoude seconded the motion. The motion
carried unanimously.
Moen pointed that the week preceding Preservation Week is "Old Brick Wbe a
eek."
Tuesday, luncheon as ate0ldbandBriesick. Conmissioo members will dbehil invitere d. Moen
will
up
stated that the Friends of Old Brick would like the Historic Preservation
Commission to present the award to Irvin 'Weber at that time. Commission
members agreed. Nowysz noted that it was important
to notify Irving Weber so
he could get it on his calendar.
REVIEW OF THE 'CERTIFIED LOCAL GOVERNMENT PROGRAM:
Moen stated that ten percent of the preservation funds received by the State
in
oorder tothe dbeaeliigible, local are
gove nm ntto be sehave tto the classihe local fiiedrasefcertit
i fled local governments." She noted that the question is whether the CoeShe
Sion wants to recommend participation in this particular program.
pointed out that the Commission meets most of the requirements, althothe
ugh
membership suirestedsdo thatcalwayoto meetrians that or an requirementtwouldect obeotonseek
Board. She suggested applications
professional advice from an historian or an architect to review
for Certificate of Appropriateness. She contended that a lack of a historian
or an arcitect on the Boarhould not certifiedh
hlaical government.
SPerry questionedewhethereshe hcouldlclato b
clarify how
this affects historical districts. Moen explained that, as an example, the
Summit theyStreet
weredna namedlocal districts. eShenated added thatnaldlistriictccansbeone
before they She added that some of the same criteria
type without being the other type,
can be used for both designations but the designation of a local historic
lied for from
district is a local prerogative. Wagner stated that the advantage seems o
be that if the community is certified, then funds can be app
ssie
both sours from the fMoen edera9rgovernmert hcurr curat was rently bleak prospects
- but noted fundt restoration
more restrictive than the
Perry rated that the local ordinance could be
Id be impassible for them o
certified local government regulations but it wou
be less restrictive and wondered if tht would
rea teoa problem with the
not dealt with
membership. Moen pointed out that that particular
at
in the stated sz
statese ablingthatisl tion anddidid
In waseoneaofathe weakest thatwshe
felth
t other
had seen. She osz added s
added yCommisio ises In If this t
snatuhe ea
rewerebrought
been
he Commission was first put together a
up when tnd have subsequently
reviewed. Moen pointed out that there appears to be nothing in the appLica
in the
tion requirements that would pay venParrYesuygestedothatahe,thoughtg it would
certified local government prog put
on the agenda for next month.
be a good idea
aato read the recommend requil and discuss it at a later date.
eed
ed
11702.-
Historic Preservation Commission
April 10, 1985
Page 5
DISCUSSION OF THE IOWA -ILLINOIS FRANCHISE ORDINANCES:
Moen distributed copies of the ordinances that would permit t;ie Iowa -Illinois
Gas 3 Electric Company to operate gas and electric light and powersystems
within the city for a period of 25 years and explained them to the Commis-
sion. She -added that there was some concern about the impact of these
ordinances on historic districts. Nowysz pointed out she felt there could be
some language changes that should occur before the final passage of these
ordinances by the City Council. She noted that the League of Women Voters
had had a hearing,and it had elicited many comments. Nowysz added that there
were many environmental concerns including brick streets being patched with
cement, transmission lines obscuring historic structures, and electrical and
gas and water boxes being fastened to the exterior of buildings without any
attempt to integrate them into the architectural design of the building.
Nowysz pointed out that there is a publication available on how to repair
brick streets. She suggested that this Commission could specify that the
guidelines in that particular publication should be followed when restoring
brick streets. She inquired as to whether or not gas and electric utilities
inform the City Engineer when they have to do work. Moen responded that she
thought they did because those particular types of repairs often have an
impact on other types of City services. Nowysz contended then that it would
be very easy for anyone who digs up the street to be given instructions about
the repair of those brick streets. Once the City Engineer is notified, she
suggested that it would be very easy for him to hand out the particular
publication suggesting that the guidelines be followed. Vander'doude inter-
jected that he thought that the City was in fact the worst offender. Nowysz
added that this was a real concern of hers because of her position and
viewpoint that things are starting to wear out as we use them. She added
previously this was not such a big problem because when things wore out the
residents moved on or replaced them with new items. She said it's becoming
imperative now that we need to learn how to repair more things rather than
throw them away and replace them. Nowysz added that she was hesitant to see
the ordinances go to Council without comment from the Historic Preservation
Commission. Nowysz agreed that there was a general sense from the other
Commission members that a memo expressing their concerns should be forwarded
to the Council.
There followed a general discussion about the unsightliness of utility boxes
fastened to the outsides of house and the proliferation of transmission lines
throughout the city. Moen summed up the discussion by asking for a concur-
rence of opinion that the concerns had been: 1) to repair brick streets back
to their original pattern; 2) to encourage the location of transmission lines
away from historic buildings; and 3) to inform residents and property owners
that power boxes need not be located on the basis of sheer convenience for
the utility companies. Perry added that this should be not only a policy for
historic places or historic districts, but should be something that could be
used throughout the City.
/?z
i
Historic Preservation Commission
April 10, 1985
Page 6•
DISCUSSION OF THE PROPOSED NORTH SIDE RESIDENTIAL HISTORIC DISTRICT:
Moen explained the copy of the survey to be sent to residents of the proposed
North Side Residential Historic District that had been included in the
members' packet. She pointed out that there would be a cover letter sent out
with the survey to the residents in the affected area. Perry agreed that he
thought it was very important that that information be gotten out. Moen
pointed out that the survey would be addressed to both owners and/or resi-
dents of the particular area. Perry wondered if it would be possible to add
another question that would seek the name of the owner of the particular
property should the survey go out to a renter. Perry stated that was a
concern of his because he thought it was important to get the survey to
everyone who might have an interest in this area. Moen said that another
problem would be the protection of the confidentiality of the survey. She
said it would be possible to make such a question optional but that the
chances of getting a good return on that may be affected. Perry agre I that
nothing should be done that would diminish the return because the more people
that respond.to the survey the better chance there seemed to him to establish
a historic district. Perry added that he liked this particular survey form
better than the postcard. Moen added that it would also have a return
envelope in it addressed to Iowa City. Nowysz explained the purpose of the
survey to the new members. She indicated that the primary purpose of the
survey was to indicate to this particular group and to the City whether or
not the initial interest that had been expressed in the area was still there.
OTHER BUSINESS:
There was general discussion on the viability of providing certificates to
recognize service on this Commission or for this Commission's efforts. Nowysz
suggested that the certificates be given to people who served at least a year
as Commission members.
Nowysz also commented on an article dated March 19, 1985, in the
Press -Citizen about preserving architectural antiques.
There was general discussion about the various types of salvage efforts on
historic structures in Iowa City.
ADJOURNMENT:
The meeting adjourned at 9:31 p.m.
1. The minutes were taken by Sam Chandler.
717.2—
MINUTES
IOWA CITY HOUSING COMMISSION
APRIL 10, 1985
MEMBERS PRESENT: Krause, Moore, Watts, Dawson
STAFF PRESENT: Hencin, Barnes, Moen, Seydel, Henderson
RECOf1,MENDATI0N TO COUNCIL: Housing Commission recommends that Fair Meadows
Addition be designated a new target area for Rental Rehabilitation Program.
Mee ti n? to Order - The meeting was called to order at 4:00 p.m. by Chairperson
Krause.
Minutes - Minutes of the February 12, 1985, meeting were approved as mailed
Fn a motion by Moore, seconded by Watts and approved 4-0.
Housing Rehabilitation - Hencin explained to the Commission that he had received
some request�rom residents in the Fair Meadows area for participation in
the Owner Occupant and Rental Rehabilitation programs. Discussion ensued
regarding extending the program to that area. It was moved by Dawson, seconded.
by Watts and approved 4-0 that the Commission recommend to Council that the
Fair Meadows area be designated a target area for Rental Rehabilitation.
Barnes presented information regarding Rental Rehabilitation application for
722 Iowa Avenue. Discussion yielded a concern about the high cost of the roof
bid. It was moved by Watts that a second roof bid be secured within thirty
days and if this second bid substantiated the first, that the request for rental
rehabilitation be approved for 722 Iowa Avenue. Seconded by Moore, approved 4-0.
Barnes then presented information for the first of two applications for forgivable
loans. The unit at 431 S. Dodge is an owner -occupied single family dwelling.
Motion by Watts, seconded by Moore, approved 4-0 to approve forgivable loan on
property at 431 S. Dodge in the amount of $17,500. Barnes then presented
information regarding the second application for forgivable loan on a single
family dwelling located at 512 West Benton. Moved by Dawson, seconded by Moore,
approved 4-0 to approve application for forgivable loan in the amount of
$17,043 on the property at 512 W. Benton Street.
Coordinator's Reoort - Section 8 Update: Henderson stated that 484,717.00
had been pat or pril 1 rents on 439 units for an average rent of 4192.98.
There were thirteen retro -starts for a total of 452 units in occupancy April 1.
Fifty Section 8 applications were submitted for approval. Public Housing Update:
It was stated that there had been a turnover of four units of Public Housing
at the end of March. Seydel then gave an update of status of the acquisition
of units for Public Housing project 22-5. He indicated that there were a total
of 34 dwelling units offered for sale and that 18 of those sites had been
selected to be viewed by the HUD appraiser. That appraisal has been taking
place this week. Seydel explained regulations regarding relocation payments
and discussed the necessity of escrowing funds as well as cost containment
specifications. He then stated that new adjustment factors have been received
and are effective March 19, 1985. He explained the significance of these.
77.3
MINUTES
IOWA CITY HOUSING COMMISSION
APRIL 10, 1985
PAGE 2
figures and that this year's factor is slightly lower than last year's
General Discussion - Seydel discussed the status of our application for fourteen
vouchers. He stated that the Section 8 202 conference in Des Moines was
attended by some Iowa City people; in particular, Bob Burns, and that he is
working with a church group who has put in an application for additional 202
funds. Discussion followed regarding the status of the Congregate Housing
project and specifically the questionnaire which will be mailed soon to a
randomly selected audience. It was directed by the Chairperson that Alvin
j Logan and Goldene Haendel be invited to attend the next Housing Commission
meeting on May 14 in order that certificates of recognition may be presented
to them for their years of service on the Housing Commission.
Meeting adjourned at 5:15 p.m. by Chairperson Krause.
Approved by:
Fred C. Krause -
9
723
PRELIMINARY
MINUTES Subject to AppravW
DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE
WEDNESDAY, APRIL 17, 1985 - 4:00 P.M.
IOWA CITY PUBLIC LIBRARY - MEETING ROOM B
MEMBERS PRESENT: Alexander, Amert, Eckholt, Haupert, Lafore, Sinek,
Summerwill, Wegman, Wockenfuss
MEMBERS ABSENT: Sieberling
STAFF PRESENT: Cain, Chandler, Farmer, Holderness
GUESTS PRESENT: Bray, Brincks, Sinnott,
RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL:
Recommend approval of the request of the Holiday Inn for three signs as per
the submitted design, for tenants on the south side of the building.
Recommend rejection of the Clinton Street improvement project as presented
with the addendum that the sense of the Committee is to suggest consultation
with a qualified landscape design architect to reassess the project with the
aim of creating a more visually interesting and integrated design concept for
this important transitional block.
CALL TO ORDER
Acting Chairperson Wegman called the meeting to order at 4:06 p.m.
CONSIDERATION OF THE MINUTES OF MARCH 20, 1985
Alexander moved that the minutes of March 20, 1985, be approved. Haupert
seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously.
URBAN RENEWAL PROJECT
1. Review and recommendation on Holiday Inn tenant space signage
Cain distributed photos of signs similar in color and script to those
proposed by the Holiday Inn for tenant signage on the south side of the
building. Alexander asked if the signs would be fabricated from metal.
Bray responded that they would be painted fiber board. Haupert asked who
was responsible for long-term maintenance. Bray indicated the lessor by
terms of their lease would have that responsibility.
Alexander moved approval of the request by the Holiday Inn for three
signsides,of asper the
building.itted Sumnerwill secondeden, for the usthef motion. oe
south
The motion
carried unanimously.
Design Review Committee
April 17, 1985
Page 2
OTHER BUSINESS
1. Review and recommendation on the Clinton Street improvements project
Cain introduced Farmer and Holderness from the City Engineering Division.
Farmer presented blueprints of the proposed Clinton Street improvement
project and briefly explained the scope of the improvements. He noted
that concrete will replace the asphalt surface on Clinton Street,
concrete will be installed along the bus stops on the west side, drainage
problems will be corrected, some curbing will be removed at the pedes-
trian crosswalk at Washington Street to facilitate the four -lane flow of
traffic, new trash cans and one tree will be added and new street lights
similar to those further south will be installed.
Eckholdt suggested that the widening of the street will allow cars to
race through what is a very congested area. Members discussed this
concern and wondered if the design should encourage such a rapid flow of
traffic.
Sumnerwill asked if it was reasonable to expect the project to be
completed in six weeks. Farmer agreed that this projection is subject to
several contingencies like weather.
Alexander asked Farmer to clarify the reason for using exposed aggregate
concrete for the narrow strip along the east side of the street. Farmer
responded that it was a conscious effort to create a transition from the
central urban renewal area to the area to the north which will not
undergo changes in the foreseeable future.
Amert asked if any consideration had been given to creating a design that
was serpentine and landscaped to augment the green area across the
street. Farmer responded that the need to maintain four lanes of traffic,
all the parking spaces, and the bus stops precluded anything but a linear
arrangement. Alexander stated that it seemed to be an opportunity lost,
that if the street was going to undergo renovation it seemed worthwhile
to attempt to end up with something more than a bare street which was
little or no improvement over what was currently in place. Farmer
replied that the space limitations like the 14 foot sidewalk, limited the
available options. He added that there would be many small improvements
that made the project worthwhile. Amert indicated that she appreciated
the pragmatic concerns of Farmer, but hoped that it was not just a take
it or leave it situation. Farmer added that the engineering solution he
was proposing should not preclude additional amenities that were practi-
cal,should the Committee so desire.
Committee members suggested several options, such as using brick or
exposed aggregate concrete instead of plain concrete between the sidewalk
and curb along the west side, using two parking spaces on the east side
to create a serpentined area with landscaping similar to the design one
block south, and providing more visual contrast by use of planters and
shrubs. Members emphasized the visual importance of this heavily used
block, right across from the Old Capitol, and the need for some contrast
and variation in materials and design.
%%T
Design Review Committee
April 17, 1985
Page 3
Cain asked when the public hearing on this proposal was scheduled.
Farmer responded it would be.on the agenda for May 7th.
Amert noted that even though it was a functional design, she was disap-
pointed.that no attempt had been made to integrate the design with the
existing space, using more landscaping. Sunmerwill asked if it was
possible to install a brick crosswalk at the corner of Clinton and Iowa
Avenue. Farmer said it was possible. Eckholt noted that the oblique
nature of that crosswalk creates a different set of problems which could
only be adequately solved by redoing the whole intersection, not just
half as now proposed. Alexander disagreed saying that he did not object
to adding the brick at only one crosswalk while the others were un-
changed. He added that the City should upgrade it now when there is the
chance and avoid the situation ten years from now of saying we wished we
had made the crosswalks brick when we had the chance. Eckholt added that
Iowa and Clinton intersection was a major pedestrian junction and
deserves some proper planning. Farmer noted that the additional cost of
brick was not in the currently budgeted plan.
In response to a question from the Committee, Cain explained that the
design was being presented to meet the Committee's objective of reviewing
plans for all public improvements to be constructed within and adjacent
to the C8D. Eckholt added that -it seemed to be presented as a courtesy,
but exemplified the frustration members had when it came to having any
impact on the ultimate design. He added that being able to comment on
the color of the trash cans and whether some bus stop pads were appropri-
ate seemed trivial. Amert agreed saying she was dissatisfied with the
overall design and would recommend having an architectural design person
look at it for the purpose of proposing a more integrated solution.
Farmer noted that he would appreciate a delineation of the members'
specific objections. Eckholt stated that Clinton Street should not be
treated like it was Gilbert Street, but should be more of a gradual
transition from the urban renewal area. Lafore noted that it seemed
possible to have alternative designs that were more aesthetically
pleasing without sacrificing the cost .considerations. Alexander pointed
out that there are many examples in other cities where through the use of
kiosks, sculpture and textures, even 17 feet of space as proposed for the
new sidewalk can be made more interesting than the plan presented.
Wegman moved that the Clinton Street improvement project be approved as
presented. Haupert seconded the motion. The motion failed (2-4-2) with
Sinek and Wegman voting for; Alexander, Amert, Sunnerwill and Wockenfuss
voting against; and Haupert and Lafore abstaining.
Cain sunned up the sense of the Committee, noting the Committee preferred
the same style trash can as the one now on Dubuque Street, agreed with
the choice of a ginko for the addition street tree on the east side of
Clinton, but, above all, recommended that the City Council have a
professional designer assess this project to consider the major visual
perspectives and develop an integrated design for this transitional
area.
Design Review Committee
April 17, 1985
Page 4
2. City Plaza Fountain
Farmer discussed the need to re -finish the pipes on the City Plaza
Fountain and compared the options of having them recoppered or painted.
Farmer stated that he had been in contact with representatives from the
Rustoleum Company who felt that given the proper preparation (that is,
sandblasting down to bare metal, the fountain pipes could be coated with
an epoxy paint which would have a potential life of fiveyears. The
Committee agreed that trying the epoxy paint was acceptable. Farmer
passed out color samples and Committee members selected "tile red" as the
preferred color. Hegman pointed out that the fountain designer is living
in Ames and should be consulted about dismantling procedures when the
renovation took place.
3. Old Capitol Center Meeting
Cain reported that owners of the Old Capitol Mall had not yet suggested a
time to meet with the Committee.
4. Sign Design Booklets
Cain distributed examples of sign design booklets from other communities.
Amert was asked to review the material and report back with ideas for a
project for tie Committee.
S. Design Review Committee Information
Summerwill asked if the effort to control newspaper vending boxes had
been dropped. Cain responded that it was still on the City Council
pending list. Summc-will noted that San Luis Obispo has uniform newspa-
per dispensers. Alexander asked how other cities control the boxes.
Haupert replied that it was done with consistent application of their
ordinances. There was general. consensus that the Design Review Committee
was still concerned about this problem and hoped that its eventual
resolution remained a priority of the City Council.
ADJOURNMENT:
The Committee adjourned at 5:15 p.m.
Minutes were taken by Sam Chandler.
77T
PUSH -ME,
PULL -ME:
CORPORATE LOCATIONAL DECISIONS
Firms in the basic industry sec-
tor of the U.S. economy (defined
to exclude local business services,
personal services, and trade) more
and more can choose to locate
their facilities all over the map. A
combination of factors has made
their locational choices less depen-
dent on fixed geographical fea-
turn, such as proximity to raw
materials and major markets, and
centrality in terms of existing la-
bor markets and business services.
These factors include sophisti-
cated long-distance transportation
networks, advances in communi-
cations, and fundamental changes
in the nature of basic economic
activities, that is, the shift, in em-
ployment terms, away from heavy
manufacturing (primary metal in-
dustries, transportation equip-
ment, petroleum and coal prod-
uce, paper products) toward basic
service industries (finance, insur-
ance, printing and publishing,
communications), light manufac-
turing (elec[ric and electronic
equipment, instruments and relat-
ed products, pharmaceuticals),
and administrative functions.
Which locational factors attract
today's growth industries is a
question of paramount impor-
tance to communities and office/
industrial developers. A recent
survey of firms in the nine -county
San Francisco Bay Area, con-
ducted by the Bay Area Council
and Gruen Gruen + Associates,
provides some insights. The sur-
vey's key Finding, perhaps, is that
the majority of the factors most
influential in locational decisions
are not related to market forces,
but are shaped by public policy
32 February851 IM
decisions affecting such variables
as housing costs, land costs, and
commutation times and costs.
The Survey
Gruen Gruen + Associates ana-
lyzed survey responses from 103
t private sector employers in the re-
gion, representing 12 percent of
all private sector wage and salary
employment in 1984 and occupy-
ing If 2 milliob square feet of
space. The survey's Findings per-
tain especially to larger firms—
those employing 1,000 or more
workers—because over 90 percent
of the employees represented in
the sample were in large firms,
and the sample's larger firms rep-
resented 57 percent of all 1979
Bay Area employment in firms of
this size. The majority of the Firms
surveved fall into three economic
sectors: manufacturing (47 per-
cent), Bnance/insuranc areal estate
(18 percent), and transportation/
communicationslutilities (I I per-
cent). By headquarters or primary
Bay Area location, the firms cur-
rently are located in San Francisco
(37 percent), and the counties of
Santa Clara (26 percent). Alameda
(17 percent), San Mateo (I5 per-
cent), Contra Costa (3 percent),
and Marin (3 percent).
Firms that have changed or that
plan to change the number, size,
or location of their Bay Area facil-
ities were asked to rate the influ-
ence of 17 different factors in
those decisions, both as to how.
they may "push" Firms from pres-
ent or previous locations and how
they may "pull" them to new loca-
tions. The factors were described
in neutral terms, such as "the cost
of land and building space." Each
then could be viewed as a positive
pull (low site costs) or a negative
push (high costs).
The Fmclings
Put Locational Decisions.
Among the firms surveyed. 63 (61
percent) had established at least
one new site with 100 or more
employees between 1978 and
1983, but 15 (24 percent) of these
firms limited their expansions to
facilities outside the region and
another 35 (56 percent) expanded
both within and outside the re-
gion. Larger firms were most like -
Iv to expand outside the region: of
90 firms occupying I million or
more square feet of space in the
region, 70 percent established at
least one non—Bay Area facility.
The number of new Bay Area fa-
cilities or site expansions employ-
ing over 100 persons was 86, with
Santa Clam County receiving the
lion's share (40 percent), followed
by San Francisco (19 percent) and
San Mateo County (15 percent).
Behind Past Decisions. Forty-
one firms that established at least
one new location with 100 or
more employees in the region be-
tween 1978 and 1983 rated the 17
push -and -pull factors on a scale of
0 (of no importance) to 10 (of
highest importance). The pull fac-
tors were generally more signifi-
cant than the factors repelling
them from previous locations.
The five most influential pull fac-
tors (and their mean scores) were:
77%
• availability of professional and
skilled labor (4.1);
• imageiprestige of location (3.3);
• transportation/commutation
time (3.2);
• attitudes toward industry (3.1):
and
• proximity to similar businesses
(3.l).
The five most influential push
factors repelling these firms from
a previous location (and their
mean scores) were:
• housing costs (2.5);
• the costs and suitability of land
and space (2.4);
• attitudes toward industry (2.2):
• imagelprestige of location (1.9);
and
• transportation/commutadon
time (1.9).
The survey results suggest some
differences in locational motiva-
tion between smaller and larger
firms. Clustering is important for
firms with 500 or fewer employ-
ees: they rated proximity to sim-
ilar businesses as the top pull fac-
tor and availability of support
industries as the third. Larger
firms are more vulnerable to pub-
lic opinion: attitude toward Indus.
try was the third most influential
pull factor for firms with 500 or
more employees, but it did not
show up as important for smaller
(firms. Finally, only the larges[
firms (2.000 or more employees)
identified the cost and suitability
of land and building space as an
important factor attracting them
to a new location.
Manufacturing firms choosing
sites outside of the Bay Area died'
the availability or cost of labor as a
prominent reason, with cost a par-
ucular concern of firms employ-
ing 2.000 or more. Nonmanufac-
turing firms moving outside the
region were influenced by a vari-
ety of concerns rather than by a
single predominant factor.
Future Locational Decisions.
Forty-two of the firms surveyed
plan to establish at least one new
site with 100 or more employees
in the next five years, 17 (40 per-
cent) of them solely outside the
region. Again, the larger firms
were the ones most likely to ex-
pand or relocate outside of the re-
gion. Planned new sites located
within the region represent
13,843,000 square feet of new
building space, housing 49,17S
employees. Most of the planned
facilities employing -100 or more
are for headquarters/administra-
tivelmanagement functions (26
percent) and sales and marketing
(26 rcent). Facilities planned for
prod uction/assembly activities are
15 percent of the total.
Behind Planned Moves. Twenty-
nine of the firms surveyed plan to
establish one or more new Bay
Area locations by 1988. Like the
past movers, they considered pull
factors stronger than push factors.
The five most important factors
Past and Planned Locational Shifts of Bay Area Firms
(Number of Firms)
Put Five Years Next Five Years
Growing Firmst 63 42
New locations both inside '
and outside the region 35 (569o) 14 (33%)
New locations only within
the region 13(21%) 11 (06%)
New locations only outside
the region 15 (44an) 17 (409r)
i For the pan five years, firms that established at lout one new site with 100 or more
empluten: fnr the nest five years, firms hat plan to esubtish at Inset ane new site with
tell or more emploven. The total number of firms surveyed camm 107.
attracting them to new locations
(and their mean scores) were:
• cost and suitability of land and
space (5.1);
• availability of professional and
skilled labor (4.4);
• image/prestige of location (4.0);
• m
tnsportation/commutadon
time (3.9); and
• attitudes toward industry (3.1).
The five most important factors
pushing [hem from their previous
locations were:
• cost and suitability of land and
space (2.8);
• attitudes toward industry (2.1);
• housing costs (1.9);
• cost of labor (1.9); and
• transportation/commutation
time (1.6).
All sizes of firms ranked the
cost and suitability of land and
building space among the top five
factors, but this item was most im-
portant for firms with 2,000 or
more employees. Large Films also
gave high ratings to such labor-m-
lated pull factors as transportation
(their second -ranked factor),
housing costs (fourth), and prox.
imity of housing (fifth).
Major employers will continue
to direct a significant proportion
of growth outside the region. The
firms to the survey plan 186 net
new or expanded locations in the
Bay Area and 190 or more outside
the region—notably in Colorado,
Texas, North Carolina, and cer-
tain other areas of California (the
Central Valley for financial and
other commercial activities; the
Sacramento/Roseville area for
manufacturing activities). The
availability of labor was the single
most
important reason cited for
locating outside the region, partic-
ularl. for firms employing 500 or
more. ■
Survey Report
A 93 -page analvsu of the Bay Arra
corporate locational never is avail-
able at a cost of $30 frum the Bay
Arra Council (348 World Trade Cen-
ter. Scan Francisco. CA 9.1111), and a
nunrnan' of its findin,Kt is available fur
S20.
T11. rn Li,10 / Februarv85 33
M
9
. ARM
MINUTES
RIVERFRONT COMMISSION
APRIL 3. 1985 - 7:30 P.M.
IOWA CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
MEMBERS PRESENT: Boutelle, Daly, Gerleman, Horowitz, Leo, McGuire, Rausch,
Willis
MEMBERS ABSENT: Oehmke
STAFF PRESENT: Cain, Chandler
GUESTS PRESENT: Len Strand
RECOMMENDATIONS TO COUNCIL:
The Commission recommends that Council request the ICC to adopt the following
regulations as special rules for the Iowa River:
1. No person shall operate any vessel towing persons on waterskis, surf-
boards or similar devices in the area bound by the Coralville Milldam and
the Burlington Street Dam.
2. No person shall operate any vessel between the Iowa Avenue Bridge and the
Burlington Street Dam.
3. No person shall swim in the Iowa River between the Iowa Avenue Bridge and
the Burlington Street Dam.
4. No person shall walk, ice skate, fish or otherwise be upon the surface of
the ice on the Iowa River between the Iowa Avenue Bridge and the Burling-
ton Street Dam.
5. No craft or vehicle shall be operated on the surface of the ice on the
Iowa River between the Iowa Avenue Bridge and the Burlington Street Dam.
The Commission recommends that there not be any provision allowing for water
ski shows/exhibitions by special authorization.
CALL TO ORDER
Willis called the meeting to order at 7:35 p.m.
CONSIDERATION AND APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF THE MARCH 6, 1985, MEETING:
Horowitz moved that the minutes of the March 6, 1985, meeting be approved.
Boutelle seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously.
CEDAR RIVER HYDROELECTRIC DAM DEMONSTRATION
Cain asked what the general sense of the Commission was concerning the time
for the demonstration. The members preferred an evening to an afternoon hour
and, agreed that either the 17th or 24th of April would be acceptable. Cain
said she would send notices to the Iowa City City Council, Coralville Mayor
?%S
Riverfront Commission
April 3, 1985
Page 2
and City Council, the Board of Supervisors and Johnson County Conservation
Board.lle ere the Hydraulics Annexn will e on Riversideld and was told by
Drive.
Cain distributed a memo to the members that summarized the discussion she had
with Iowa Conservation Commission staff on March 27, 1985. After a brief
explanation of a proposed time frame for action on this issue, Cain responded
to members' questions.
Boutelle asked if there were to be special permits issued for special events,
then would it be correct to say that the Conservation Comnission would be the
body that issued the permits. Cain
one d and
dale permits ded that end to hae Citcould
request to be notified of any app
an
opportunity to comment on them before ICC made its decision. Horowitz asked
frame
probably have t this
move quickly toCain
havesaid
anysinpid not know
would be input.
Boutelle stated that the Riverfront Commission was on record as being opposed
to water skiing
sand In favor of more problems have occurred atppeakvuse timesuses July fishin4th.
or
canoeing, 9 that
She expressed the feeling that if forced with choosing one use or the other,
she favored the passive use. Gerleman agreed that Riverfront was on the
record against water -towing activities.
Cain suggested that the Riverfront Commission delineate the specific area of
the river to be covered by the prohibition on towing.
be notified other juris ictions
border the river
yy of segment specified, Y
shouldintention,
to adoption of the ial rules. She added that Coralville's support
could
s.
Boutelle said she thought the previous position of the Riverfront Commission
ed that it
had been to seek a ban on water skiing between the dams. Dthat was sta
completely
may be easier to prohibit skiing on any p
within the corporate limits of Iowa City. Boutelle wondered if one of the
rules could prohibit swimming. Cain responded that the acceptability of a
rule is predicated on its scope and relation to ensuring the health and
that the Conservation Commission could be
safety of residents. She noted
expected to look more favorably on special rules that had the support of all
affected requesting specialtions. Cain sathat rules to cooperate in their e ICC also enforcement.
expects the body
enforcement.
Willis suggested that a clear stance be taken. If no water-skiing was what
at
the ought byntheomCrintssion Counciltfrom then the Conservation ation should Commission into ctheeformnd hof
be sought Ge Y
a rule. Gerleman stated that different language could be used to achieve
similar goals that is, a speed
Cai^i limit
out thatoseveraltyearsdagofthe
tively eliminate water-skiing.
wak s. Thisawouldfbeumore difficultinto devise a to measure restriction andenforceSpeAt the earlier
79r
Riverfront Commission
April 3, 1985
Page 3
discussion the Commission decided not to pursue such a regulation. Willis
agreed stating that he thought there were compelling reasons to say exactly
what the goal of this Commission was, that is, no water-skiing.
Horowitz suggested that the recommendation be passed on to the City Council.
Willis agreed that a motion to that effect would be welcomed by him. McGuire
moved that the Riverfront Commission's position that water-skiing be prohib-
ited be reaffirmed and that the City Council should seek to have the regula-
tions in the current City ordinance (except Sec. 24-84) become special rules
of the Conservation Commission in order to control activity on the Iowa
River. Rausch seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously.
Willis suggested that the Commission address the question of what area they
wanted the rules to cover. Daly moved that the proposed rule govern the area
of the river that is within the confines of Iowa City, where both banks are
in Iowa City, roughly from CRANDIC Park to the Izaak Walton League. Horowitz
seconded the motion. McGuire stated that with the cooperation of Coralville,
the rules could cover the area from dam to dam. Horowitz added that under
the auspices of the fringe area agreement with Johnson County, perhaps
Johnson County could be included. Boutelle replied that there are some areas
of the Iowa River in Johnson County where water-skiing may be safe and
enjoyable. Willis agreed, suggesting that it is desirable to cooperate with
Johnson County, but the City should not assume the problems are the same. Leo
stated that she wanted the process to be positive, so passive use of the
river could be encouraged dam to dam.
The motion failed 1 to 7, with Daly voting aye.
Rausch moved that the proposed rules apply to the area between the Coralville
Milldam and the Burlington Street dam. McGuire seconded the motion. The
motion carried unanimously.
Willis wondered if anything else could be done to encourage intergovernmental
cooperation. Boutelle asked if this was a responsibility of this Commission
or if that was a duty of the City Council. Willis replied that he thought it
was proper to make such a recommendation. Boutelle agreed that the Commis-
sion could recommend cooperative enforcement of the special rules. Gerleman
pointed out that having the rules in the City Code inferred an intent to
cooperatively enforce them. Willis asked if the Commission members thought
that the issue was clear. Gerleman said he thought the intent was clear and
that subsequent motions were unnecessary at this time.
Boutelle wondered if the Parks and Recreation Commission was informed about
this issue. Willis said that, as the Park and Recreation representative to
the Riverfront Commission, he would let them know at their next meeting.
Rausch indicated that due to a continuing concern for the area above the dam,
he wanted Coralville apprised of the recommendations and discussion of the
Commission. Cain indicated she would forward the information to Coralville.
7,S
Riverfront Commission
April 3, 1985
Page 4
DISCUSSION OF IOWA RIVERS MONTH ACTIVITIES:
Leo reported that she had called the Press -Citizen to inquire about having
articles about the river published during June. She had also talked to
Irving Weber, who told her of many river activities that had occurred earlier
in the City's history. Boutelle asked about coordinating events with
Riverfest. Leo indicated that this occurred too early for Iowa Rivers Month
and had seemed to be mainly a University event. Boutelle said that Riverfest
attracted all sorts of organizations, not just the University ones. Leo
suggested it would not be too much to have another event when the weather is
warmer. Boutelle wondered if there were any other city events that could tie
into such an activity. Cain indicated that she had reviewed a file on past
activities for Iowa Rivers month. Some of those events included a proclama-
tion by the Mayor declaring the month Iowa River Month and a variety of other
suggestions.
Leo said she had also inquired about the Sam Calvin photograph collection at
the Geology Department at the University of Iowa. This collection is a
portfolio of pictures of the river. She suggested that it may be possible to
use this portfolio to develop a display in the Public Library. She stated
that she also talked with the Geology Department about the development of a
layman's guide to the geology of the river area. Leo indicated she had
looked into various activities but -would not be able to follow-up on all of
them for the Commission due to other responsibilities.
McGuire suggested that the newspaper articles would certainly tend to create
some interest in the river. She also wondered if it was possible to have UI
crew races on the river or if the river segment by City Park was too short
for such an activity.
Willis said he thought that the idea of establishing a recognition program
for people who had demonstrated positive treatment of riverbank areas was an
excellent idea. Leo agreed that it was a good idea but that the members of
this Commission would need more information about how to evaluate sensitive
riverbank treatment. Daly said he also thought there were many examples of
riverbank areas or projects that were appropriate for recognition. Gerleman
suggested that the Press -Citizen publish photos of such improvements.
Boutelle suggested that the Commission ask Harry Ostrander, UI Recreational
Services, if he would help organize canoe races in conjunction with river
month. She thought he would be the person who would best know how to plan
such an activity. She added that she would volunteer to call him to inquire
about the possibility of such an activity. Cain suggested that it might be
beneficial to let Parks and Recreation know about the various activities that
the Riverfront Commission might plan. Willis said that he would keep them
informed. Cain indicated that staff would take care of seeing that the
Mayor's proclamation was forthcoming, compose a general press release and
call the Library to reserve display space. Leo said she would continue to
i report on the availability of the pictures from the Geology Department and
the progress of putting together information with Irving Weber.
77s
Riverfront Commission
April 3, 1985
Page 5
Leo suggested that although all of the ideas might not be implemented this
year, it would be useful to .keep them in mind for next year. McGuire agreed
saying it might be possible to announce certain programs, like a photo
contest, recognition program and fishing contest, for next year when activi-
ties take place this June.
OTHER BUSINESS:
1. Cain distributed House File 151, a proposed bill to permit municipalities
to regulate noise on rivers within their boundaries, for the members'
information.
2. McGuire said that the Urban Environment Ad Hoc Committee is developing
recommendations to implement the urban environment policies. She added
that the Committee must have these recommendations to the City Council by
July. She asked that a report from the Ad Hoc Committee be included on
next month's agenda so the Commission could see how the Ad Hoc Committee
has progressed on the various plans and problems.
3. Cain told the Commission members that there had been no action on Sturgis
Corner to date. Also, at different times both Engineering staff and she
personally had examined the ravine area north of Sturgis Corner but had
found little trash or evidence of dumping in the ravine.
4. Cain told the Commission that Anne Moses had resigned from the Commis-
sion. She added that if any member knew of someone who was interested in
joining the Commission, please encourage them to apply.
5. Cain indicated that a new planner, Melody Rockwell, had been hired as
Community Assistance Coordinator and staff assistant to the Riverfront
Commission. Ms. Rockwell should be present at the May meeting.
Commission adjourned by consensus at 9:11 p.m.
Minutes taken by Sam Chandler.
77S
MINUTES
COMMITTEE ON COMMUNITY NEEDS
TUESDAY, APRIL 16, 1985 - 3:30 P.M.
IOWA CITY RECREATION CENTER - ROOM A
MEMBERS PRESENT: Parden, Becker, Leshtz, Williams, Cooper, Kubby, Smith,
Watts, Strabala
MEMBERS ABSENT: Lauria, Patrick
STAFF PRESENT: Nugent, Hencin, Cain, Moen, Chandler
GUESTS PRESENT: (See attached sheet)
CALL TO ORDER:
Vice -Chairperson Kubby called the meeting to order at 3:30 p.m.
RECOMMENDATIONS TO CITY COUNCIL:
Committee on Community Needs recommends to City Council that the contract with
the Johnson County Citizens Committee to publish the Accessibility Guide be
extended three months, to July 1, 1985.
REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF THE MARCH 19, 1985, MEETING:
Becker noted that page 3, paragraph 4, should read "had been completed," not
"have been com leted." Leshtz stated that the first line under public discus-
s on s ou e c Barer to reflect the fact that anyone can make the request and
that no record is made of who it is. Kubby asked that the first line in the.
third paragraph read "may want to recommend" rather than "had recommended."
Williams moved approval -o- the minutes as amended. Becker seconded the motion.
The motion carried unanimously.
PUBLIC DISCUSSION:
Phil Nychay, Chair of the Resources Conservation Commission, distributed copies
of that Commission's recommendations regarding the gas and electric franchise
ordinances to the City Council. Nychay explained that after a conversation with
the Mayor, he had decided to keep any Board or Commission that had anything to
do with energy or conservation policy informed. He added that he was before
CCN to seek input and provide information. Nychay said he was seeking CCN's
endorsement of the recommendation.
Parden noted that $350,000 (from the franchise fee) was a substantial amount
of money and wondered what would happen to it if it was not used. Nychay
replied that it would be an indication that his proposal was not working.
Hencin asked if there were any income restrictions on the recipients of the
funds. Nychay replied that any resident was eligible. Kubby asked if funds
could be used for alternative energy sources. Nychay said that was possible -
things like co -generation at the milldam, methane gas from the sewer treatment
plant and funds to purchase low energy light bulbs. Kubby asked if Nychay was
asking CCN to endorse the whole concept or just the franchise fee arrangement.
Nychay responded that it was a complete package and its -length was recognition
of the potential for rapid changes in the energy field.
774
Committee on Community Needs
April 16, 1985
Page 2
Kubby noted that it was an economic incentive package that would channel energy
dollars into efficient uses at the local level rather than perpetuating the old
habits of exporting dollars to areas outside the local business zone. Becker
asked if the City Council was willing to reconsider their stance. Nychay said
that it was probable in his opinion.
Williams asked how many additional salaried people would be required to
administer the program. Nychay replied that it would be necessary to hire a
utility specialist.
Leshtz moved that the Committee on Community Needs endorse the Resource
Conservation Committee's recommendation to the City Council. Williams seconded
the motion. The motion carried unanimously.
Hencin noted that this was not an official recommendation because it was not on
the agenda. Williams suggested its inclusion on next month's agenda for formal
action. Kubby agreed and it was so ordered.
OTHER DISCUSSION:
Williams suggested that the CCN express its desire to see that the Creekside
Alley Project be kept off the "back burner." Moen agreed to contact Mr.
Farmer, City Engineer.
BUFFALO CORNER OF BLACKHAWK MINIPARK-:
Cain explained the proposal and indicated she would respond to questions.
Parden asked what funds would be used to renovate the minipark. Cain responded
that would be funded by proceeds from the sale of the hotel property: She
added that the design that accompanied the Small -Mears project was ,lust a
suggestion, not the final design. Kubby noted that the diagonal nature of the
layout would allow a greater use of the park than is currently possible.
Strabala arrived at 4:00 p.m.
Williams asked if the mural would be preserved. Cain responded that it would
not, that the wall was not originally intended to be an exterior surface and
would have to be refinished. Kubby thanked Cain for the information, noting
that it would be useful when the final design questions are addressed con-
cerning the park.
Cain noted that as an additional piece of information the Riverfront Commission
was having a demonstration of the milldam proposal at the Hydraulics Annex that
may be of interest to this Commission.
OLD BUSINESS:
Accessibilitv Guide.
Smith noted that a previous extension to April 1st had been granted, so this
extension would be October 1st. Mona McElderry stated that it was now realis-
tic to anticipate completion of the project in just three more months. She
added the only remaining problem was the need for a donation of the printing
services. She noted that in light of that, they would therefore only ask for
an extension of three months.
?7G
Committee on Community Needs
April 16, 1985
Page 3
Hencin asked if this accessibility survey was in conflict with the Human Rights
Commission survey. Maris Snider replied that the current survey was more
comprehensive because it included on-site data and observations. Leshtz noted
that since the project was started almost one year ago, it may be advisable to
update the information. Snider indicated that updating was being done as the
project progressed. Smith moved to recommend to City Council that the contract
for the Accessibility Guide be extended three months to July 1, 1985. Leshtz
seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously.
Creekside Sidewalks.
Leshtz stated that a sidewalk on Sheridan Avenue, which is located in the
Creekside NIA is a part of the City's sidewalk assessment proposal. Smith
asked if those were replacement sidewalks. Leshtz said they were new sidewalks
that the neighbors do not necessarily want nor perceive as needed. Kubby asked
if CCN had to make a recommendation to the City Council. Moen responded that
CCN would have to make a recommendation to the City Council only if CDBG funds
were used to fund this sidewalk.
Leshtz stated that there had not been a public hearing yet. Kubby added that
she would not feel comfortable making any recommendation until after an
estimate of the cost of this project was available. Leshtz suggested that the
residents of the area could make their concerns known to the City Council
directly or via a public hearing on the plans and specifications for this
project. Parden wondered what input -was required of CCN. Moen replied that at
this point, this was for CCN's information only; CCN could recommend the use of
CDBG money for this project at a later date.
Kubby asked what the status of the other Creekside sidewalk project was. Moen
indht from Jackson Avenue
andiG Street esid ret at the sidents present
edetermine input
theirwas
iin new interest
sdewalks. She said
there were two directions that needed exploration: 1) whether to reaffirm
CCN's position on Muscatine Avenue; and 2) to get opinions from the Jackson
Street residents.
The Jackson Street residents present suggested they were not interested in
having more sidewalks, that the amount of traffic did not justify them, and
construction of any sidewalks would jeopardize several mature black walnut
trees. Williams agreed the Jackson area was somewhat secluded and stated the
original concern had been with Muscatine Avenue. Kubby noted that no action
would be needed on Jackson Street if the Committee refocused its attention on
Muscatine Avenue. Williams agreed saying that Jackson Street was just an
alternative. Parden moved that CCN reaffirm its original motion concerning the
construction of sidewalks on Muscatine Avenue. Watts seconded the motion. The
motion carried (8-0-1) with Kubby abstaining.
STATUS REPORTS FOR APRIL:
Congregate Housing Development.
Parden reported on the current survey explaining that it sought to determine if
there was justification for assisted living (see attached report). Williams
asked poverty fincomesthreshholds.indicate
Parden responded percentage
it would show that elderly
hatare
below
the as well
as long-term trends.
774
Committee on Community Needs
April 16, 1985
Page 4
Kirkwood Circle Drainage.
Williams stated that bids were let. on April 2nd for the project and construc-
tion was scheduled to start April 22nd by the M.J. Daly Construction Company.
He added that the bids were just $500 over the CDBG allocation. Nugent noted
that the bids were $20,000 under the Engineer's estimate.
Goodwill Industries Renovation.
Becker stated the project will cost $205,000 and work is scheduled to start
June 1st.
North Market Play Area.
Smith reported that a $3,000 grant would be used to install playground equip-
ment. She added that an additional $1500 would be contributed by the Horace
Mann PTO and that the equipment should be installed by this summer.
Housing Rehabilitation.
Kubby stated that she had gone on a tour with Pam Barnes and was very pleased
and amazed at the worthwhile projects being completed. She noted work on
houses on Benton and South Dodge Streets as current examples.
OTHER BUSINESS:
Leshtz suggested that the Committee, in its thinking about sidewalks, set up a
policy to determine who is uitiTately responsible for the sidewalks. Williams
responded that if it is Public Works, it seemed to him that it was a City
problem and responsibility. Kubby suggested that discussion of the sidewalks
be an agenda item for the next meeting. Williams agreed saying that he thought
it would be a good item for member discussion. Kubby stated that she thought
maybe Leshtz could report on this topic for the Committee. Parden added that
she thought the CCN should get someone from the City Engineer's office to
explain the various services. She expressed the thought that the City seems to
be saying that if the money is available, the City will put in sidewalks
whether or not the people want it.
ADJOURNMENT:
The meeting adjourned at 4:50 p.m.
Minutes taken by Sam Chandler.
7_70/