HomeMy WebLinkAbout1985-08-27 OrdinanceI
ORDINANCE NO. 85-3250
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE SIGN REGULATIONS
OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO PERMIT FACIA
SIGNS TO COVER 15% OF THE SIGN WALL AREA.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF IOWA CITY, IOWA:
SECTION I. PURPOSE. In order to allow
full usage of the building signage allow-
ance, particularly in covered malls and
other structures in which window and
awning signs are not practical, this
ordinance allows the use of facia signs to
meet the maximum building signage allow-
ance of 15%.
SECTION II. AMENDMENT. The following
sections of the Sign egulations adopted
by Ordinance 85-3226 are amended as
follows:
Sec. 36-62(c)(2)c.2.a be deleted and
the following inserted in lieu thereof:
a. Sign: Facia.
Maximum area: Fifteen percent
(15%) of the sign wall area.
Maximum height: None.
Sec. 36-62(c)(3)c.2.a, be deleted and
the following inserted in lieu thereof:
a. Sign: Facia.
Maximum area: Fifteen percent
(15%) of the sign wall area.
Maximum height: None.
Sec. 36-62(c)(4)c.2.a. be deleted and
the following inserted in lieu thereof:
a. Sign: Facia.
Maximum area: Fifteen percent
(15%) of the sign wall area.
Maximum height: None.
Sec. 36-62(c)(5)c.2.a. be deleted and
the following inserted in lieu thereof:
a. Sign: Facia.
Maximum area: Fifteen percent
(15%) of the sign wall area.
Maximum height: None.
Sec. 36-62(c) (6)c.2.a. be deleted and
the following inserted in lieu thereof:
a. Sign: Facia.
Maximum area: Fifteen percent
(15%) of the sign wall area.
Maximum height: None.
SECTION III. CERTIFICATION. The City
Clerk is hereby authorized to certify said
amendment upon passage and approval by law
and record same at the Johnson County
Recorder's Office.
i
i
1593
_.. _.... , _
Ordinance No. 85-3250
Page 2
SECTION IV. REPEALER: All ordinances and
parts of ordinances in conflict with the
provision of this ordinance are hereby
repealed.
SECTION V. SEVERABILITY: If any section,
provisionor parE-o 'iFe Ordinance shall
be adjudged to be invalid or unconstitu-
tional, such adjudication shall not affect
the validity of the Ordinance as a whole
or any section, provision or part thereof
not adjudged invalid or unconstitutional.
SECTION VI. EFFECTIVE DATE: This Ordi-
nance shall e in effect after its final
passage, approval and publication as
required by -law.
Passed andproved this 27th day of
August, 1985. t A n
ATTEST:
By Th Legal Dcp A nt
f
I
I:
1
i
"Ji
,I
i
i
It was moved by Ambriscoand seconded by Zuber
that the Ordinance as reada adopted and upon ro ca ere
were:
AYES: NAYS: ABSENT:
X
AMBRISCO
X
BAKER
X
DICKSON
X
ERDANL
MCDONALD
STRAIT
X
ZUBER
First consideration 7 30 85
Vote for passage: Ayes: Dic on, Erdahl, McDonald,
Strait, Zuber, Ambrisco, Baker. Nays: None
Second consideration 8/13/85
Vote for passage Ayes: Er , trait, Ambrisco,
Baker, Dickson. Nays: None. Absent: McDonald, Zuber
Date published
ORDINANCE NO. 85- 3251
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND CITY CODE OF
ORDINANCES CHAPTER 26 RELATING TO PEDDLERS
AND SOLICITORS TO PROVIDE PROCEDURES FOR
APPEAL OF DENIAL OR REVOCATION OF SUCH
PERMITS.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF IOWA
CITY, IOWA:
SECTION I. PURPOSE. The purpose of this
ordinance is, to revise the City Code of
Ordinances to clarify the rights of
applicants and businesses to hearings when
applications for permits are denied by the
City Clerk, or permits are revoked.
SECTION II. AMENDMENTS. Sections 26-18
an of the IowaCity
Code of
Ordinances are hereby repealed, and the
following are adopted in lieu thereof:
Sec. 26-18 Denial; appeal.
Any person aggrieved by the action of
the City Clerk in the denial or
revocation of a license as provided in
this chapter shall have the right of
appeal to the City Manager. Such
appeal shall be taken within ten (10)
days of the action complained of by
filing with the City Manager a written
statement setting forth fully the
grounds for the appeal. The City
Manager shall set a time and place for
a hearing on such appeal and notice of
such hearing shall be given to the
petitioner therefor in the same manner
as provided for notice of hearing upon
revocation. The decisions and order of
the City Manager on such appeal shall
be final and conclusive.
Sec. 26-23. Revocation; Emergency
Orders; Hearing.
The City Clerk may revoke any license
issued under this chapter where the
licensee, in the application for the
license or in the course of conducting
his/her business has made fraudulent or
incorrect statements, or has violated
this chapter or has otherwise conducted
his/her business in an unlawful manner.
Falsification of information on the
application shall be grounds for
revocation. However, prior to revoca-
tion the City Clerk shall afford the
licensee an opportunity for a hearing
as to whether or not the license shall
F
• i.
i
l
I"
1
I
ORDINANCE NO. 85- 3251
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND CITY CODE OF
ORDINANCES CHAPTER 26 RELATING TO PEDDLERS
AND SOLICITORS TO PROVIDE PROCEDURES FOR
APPEAL OF DENIAL OR REVOCATION OF SUCH
PERMITS.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF IOWA
CITY, IOWA:
SECTION I. PURPOSE. The purpose of this
ordinance is, to revise the City Code of
Ordinances to clarify the rights of
applicants and businesses to hearings when
applications for permits are denied by the
City Clerk, or permits are revoked.
SECTION II. AMENDMENTS. Sections 26-18
an of the IowaCity
Code of
Ordinances are hereby repealed, and the
following are adopted in lieu thereof:
Sec. 26-18 Denial; appeal.
Any person aggrieved by the action of
the City Clerk in the denial or
revocation of a license as provided in
this chapter shall have the right of
appeal to the City Manager. Such
appeal shall be taken within ten (10)
days of the action complained of by
filing with the City Manager a written
statement setting forth fully the
grounds for the appeal. The City
Manager shall set a time and place for
a hearing on such appeal and notice of
such hearing shall be given to the
petitioner therefor in the same manner
as provided for notice of hearing upon
revocation. The decisions and order of
the City Manager on such appeal shall
be final and conclusive.
Sec. 26-23. Revocation; Emergency
Orders; Hearing.
The City Clerk may revoke any license
issued under this chapter where the
licensee, in the application for the
license or in the course of conducting
his/her business has made fraudulent or
incorrect statements, or has violated
this chapter or has otherwise conducted
his/her business in an unlawful manner.
Falsification of information on the
application shall be grounds for
revocation. However, prior to revoca-
tion the City Clerk shall afford the
licensee an opportunity for a hearing
as to whether or not the license shall
• i.
l
I"
1
i
I
i
I
ORDINANCE NO. 85-3251
PAGE 2
be revoked. Notice of the hearing on
revocation of a license shall be given
in writing, setting forth specifically
the grounds of complaint, and the time
and place of hearing. Such notice
shall be either hand delivered or
mailed by registered mail to the
licensee at his/her local address as
shown on the permit application at
least twenty-four (24) hours prior to
the time set for hearing.
If, after such hearing, the Clerk
determines that there are grounds for
revocation, or if the licensee fails to
appear at such hearing, the revocation
shall be effective immediately or at
the time and manner prescribed by the
Clerk.
SECTION II. REPEALER. All ordinances and
pars of ordinances in conflict with the
provision of this ordinance are hereby
repealed.
SECTION III. SEVERABILITY. If any
section, provision or par of the Ordi-
nance shall be adjudged to be invalid or
unconstitutional, such adjudication shall
not affect the validity of the Ordinance
as a whole or any section, provision or
part thereof not adjudged invalid or
unconstitutional.
SECTION IV. EFFECTIVE DATE. This
Ordinance shall be in effect after its
final passage, approval and publication as
required by law.
Passed and approved this 27th day of
August, 1 5.
v
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
Recehwd i Approved
By the al Deperfinent
%/1 o1fS
Ilpa;L
It was proved by Dickson and seconded by Ambrisco
that the r finance as read a adopted and upon ro ca ere
were:
AYES: NAYS: ABSENT:
x_ AMBRISCO
_x BAKER
X DICKSON
EROAHL
X MCDONALD
R STRAIT
x ZUBER
First considerationJ
_uly 16, 1985
Vote for passage: Ayes: Strait, Zuber, Ambrisco,
Dickson, Erdahl, McDonald. Nays: Baker. Absent: None.
Second consideration 8/13/85
Vote for passage yes: is on, Erdahl, Strait, Baker,
Ambrisco. Nays: None. Absent: McDonald, Zuber.
Date published 9/4/85