Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1984-03-27 Bd Comm. minutesMINUTES IOWA CITY HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION FEBRUARY 8, 1984 7:30 P.M. IOWA CITY PUBLIC LIBRARY - MEETING ROOM B MEMBERS PRESENT: Margaret Nowysz, Howard Jones, Greg Duffey, Steven Vanderwoude MEMBERS ABSENT: Jim Hayes, Chuck Skaugstad, Jackie Blank GUESTS PRESENT: Reverend Bob Staes, Karen Herzog ACTIONS TAKEN BY COMMISSION: 1. Approval of minutes, January 11, 1984 - passed unanimously. 2. Send letter to the University of Iowa regarding the Kuhl House an 119 West Park Road - passed unanimously. 3. Approval of the proposed North Side Commercial District as an Iowa City historic district - passed unanimously. 4. Forward changes of the Historic Preservation Ordinance to the Planning and Zoning Commission for review - passed unanimously. S. Send letter to the State Office of Historic Preservation in support of the nomination of 606 South Johnson Street to the National Register -passed unanimously. 6. Create a sub-comnittee to investigate the feasibility of obtaining a Cultural Grant from the State Historic Preservation Office - passed unanimously. 7. Presented motion to co-sponsor a historic homes trip to Quincy, Illinois with the University of Iowa Museum of Art and Recreation Center - passed -unanimously. MINUTES: Margaret Nowysz suggested that a misspelled word in the paragraph entitled Proposed Ordinance be changed to "No Material Effect" from the present wording °Po Materia er." Howard Jones presented a motion that the minutes of the January 11, 1984, Iowa City Historic Preservation Commission be approved as amended. Greg Duffey seconded the motion and it passed unanimously without discussion. PUBLIC DISCUSSION: Reverend Bob Staes from the Newman Center introduced himself and stated that he was representing Bishop O'Keefe in reference to inclusion of their property at 116 E. Jefferson Street in the proposed North Side Commercial District. He stated that the diocese did not want their building included in the district due to possible future redevelopment plans. Father Staes suggested that the boundary be moved to the east of their building. He stated that the additional regulations of the Historic Preservation Ordinance would pose redevelopment impediments to the church. MINUTES IOWA CITY HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION FEBRUARY 8, 1984 PAGE 2 Margaret Nowysz and Steve VanderWoude explained the provisions of the ordinance in detail as well as outlining the series of public meetings and readings for consideration that would have to take place prior to the official creation of a North Side Commercial District. Steve VanderWoude stated that for some time he had been concerned about the lack of care exercised by the University of Iowa in regard to the Kuhl House located at 119 West Park Road. Steve suggested that the Commission express its concern for the upkeep of the structure to the appropriate university official. Margaret Nowysz stated that this building was one of the oldest structures in Iowa City and should be preserved from neglect. Steve VanderWoude presented a motion to send a letter to the appropriate University official stating that the Commission had an interest in the long- term preservation of this key historical structure in Iowa City located at 119 West Park Road. Greg Duffey seconded the motion and it passed unanimously without discussion. DISTRICT UPDATE: Pat Keller explained that the proposed South Summit Street and Woodlawn Avenue districts were scheduled for second consideration at the February 14th meeting of the City Council. The North Side Residential District was being prepared for the Planning and Zoning Commission review. Pat Keller stated that official Commission action on the proposed North Side Commercial District had yet to be i taken by the Commission. Steve VanderWoude presented a motion to approve the North Side Commercial District as proposed at the public hearing. Howard Jones seconded the motion and it passed unanimously without discussion. The Commission then instructed staff to inform Father Staes as to the outcome of the action taken by the Commission. PROPOSED ORDINANCE CHANGES: Margaret Nowysz noted that on page 6, paragraph g., the third line should be changed to "must be filed" from "must a filed." Staff then reviewed the changes suggested by the Assistant City Attorney. Steve VanderWoude presented a motion to approve the changes to the Historic Preservation Ordinance as amended and forward these changes to the Planning and Zoning Commission for review and comment. Greg Duffey seconded the motion and it passed unanimously without discussion. EXTERIOR REVIEW DOCUMENTATION: Margaret .Nowysz suggested that the Chair of the Commission, PPD staff and Housing Inspection Services meet to finalize forms for the review of historic building permits. The Commission concurred with the suggestion. SOS.. MINUTES IOWA CITY HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION FEBRUARY 8, 1984 PAGE 3 CORRESPONDENCE: Margaret Nowysz read the letter from the State Historic Preservation Office regarding National Register nomination for the Bristol House located at 606 South Johnson Street. Greg Duffey presented a motion to send a letter to the State Historic Preservation Office from the Commission supporting the nomina- tion of this house to the National Register. Howard Jones seconded the motion and it passed unanimously without discussion. [�9Si►I:ld�dc�dijf Margaret Nowysz explained the Cultural Grant Program to the Commission and stated that it appeared that Iowa City would not rank high an the list of point priorities for funding. She stated that she could contact the State office to ascertain the probability of obtaining funding. Steve VanderWoude presented a motion that the Chair of the Iowa City Historic Preservation Commission contact the Des Moines Office of Historic Preservation { to obtain an estimate of funding probability and then, if deemed appropriate, IJ work with staff to submit a grant application. Greg Duffey seconded the motion and it passed unanimously without discussion. COMMISSIONERS' REPORTS: Steve VanderWoude described his recent trip to Madison, Wisconsin, and ex- plained the program that was running in that city for approximately 13 years. He also explained that the Commission had a wide variety of funding but did not have many districts. He then submitted the copies of the ordinance to staff to place on file. Margaret Nowysz presented material an plans for an historic tour of Quincy, Illinois, that would be sponsored by the University Museum of Art, the Iowa City Recreation Department and the Iowa City Historic Preservation Commission. She stated that all three groups had expressed an interest in the trip and that the Recreation Department would be responsible for packaging the trip. Howard Jones presented a motion to co-sponsor the historic preservation trip with the University of Iowa Museum of Art and Recreation Center for the 14th of April 1984. Steve VanderWoude seconded the motion and it passed unanimously without discussion. Greg Duffey and Margaret Nowysz both read their statement of goals and objec- tives to the Committee as previously requested of all Compission members by the Commission Chair. ADJOURNMENT: Howard Jones presented a motion to adjourn the Iowa City Historic Preservation Commission. Steve VanderWoude seconded the motion and it passed unanimously without discussion. The Iowa City Historic Preservation Commission adjourned at 9:55 p.m. _5 -oz MINUTES SENIOR CENTER COMMISSION JANUARY 12, 1984 1:30 P.M. CONFERENCE ROOM MEMBERS PRESENT: Bill Coen, Margaret Clover, Mike Rattchee, Bob Jackson MEMBERS ABSENT: Gladys Scott, Henry Fox, Conrad Browne COUNCIL OF ELDERS PRESENT: Ruth Wagner, Ora Crites STAFF PRESENT: Bette Meisel, Eka Udcm, Jill Smith OTHERS PRESENT: Jean Snow, ESA CALL TO ORDER: Bill Coen introduced Bob Jackson, a new Senior Center Commission member. Henry Fox has also joined the Commission as a new member. MINUTES: Margaret Clover suggested amending the December minutes. The correction is as follows, "Mr. Jackson ... is employed by Mid -Eastern Iowa Community Mental Health Center...". Clover moved to accept the minutes as amended, Jackson seconded the motion, motion declared carried (4 yes, 3 absent). PUBLIC DISCUSSION: Bette Meisel introduced Jean Snow, the new director of Elderly Services Agency. Bill Coen expressed his sincere appreciation for the get well card and wishes for a speedy recovery during his recent illness. ELECTION OF OFFICERS: Mike Rattchee nominated Bill Coen and Margaret Clover for Chairperson and Vice -Chairperson respectively. Bob Jackson nominated Mike Rattchee for secretary. Bill Coen, Margaret Clover, and Mike Rattchee were elected as nominated by acclamation. BUDGET: Bette Meisel explained the budget as stated in the Fy85 budget preparation form. She noted the following corrections in the budget preparation form: 8310 Travel expenses $1,250 9220 Contracted improvements $12,000 9330 Furniture and office equipment $3,924 9500 Parking transfer $4,000 $0 3 SENIOR CENTER COMMS jION JANUARY 12, 1984 PAGE 2 In reference to the F785 proposed budget manual, Meisel stated that the corrections were made on page 203 (accounting for County's contribution), page 204 a change to one full-time Senior Center typist, and 24 tables at $3,924. The tables are for classroom use. The new proposed budget amount should be $200,433. Meisel said that the City administration agrees with the need for an energy management system and the chairs/tables purchase. Meisel explained that the travel line amount recommended would cover either one out-of-state seminar for one staff member or in-state training for volunteers and staff. Commission members discussed the request for another volunteer specialist and the budget presentation to the City Council. Margaret Clover suggested that we should keep requesting the additional volunteer specialist at each year's budget request. Bill Coen and Mike Kattchee, along with Bette Meisel, will attend the budget hearing. Bette Meisel stated that the County budget presentation meeting needs to be scheduled. Mike Kattchee suggested scheduling the budget meeting with the County, on January 17 or 19. Meisel will contact the County Board of Supervisors and prepare a budget packet. LEASE OF SPACE AGREEMEt: Bette Meisel explained that the Senior Center has contracts with agencies that use the Senior Center on a full-time basis. She said that a policy is needed regarding contract requirements for organizations that have established telephone services and use the Senior Center on a regularly scheduled basis. Bob Jackson raised concerns about unincorporated groups being legally bound to a lease agreement. Mike Kattchee suggested setting up guidelines and requiring lease agreements for agencies that use space for extended periods of time. NON-SMOKING AREA: Bette Meisel explained the need for a non-smoking area in the Senior Center lobby. The television area would be designated as a non-smoking area. Commission members agreed that this area should be designated as such and that the operational handbook need not be changed. COUNCIL OF INTERNATIONAL PROGRAMS (CIP) REQUEST: Bette Meisel stated that the Council of International Programs allows foreign professionals to work in the United States to gain additional experience in their expertise. The Senior Center has an opportunity to have someone work with the volunteer program during June and July. The cost of the program is $800 with CIP and the Senior Center sharing the cost. Jeanne Williams is attending a conference in New York in hopes of obtaining a CIP professional in gerontolgy for placement in the Senior Center. EVALUATION• Bill Coen explained that an evaluation committee has been established to evaluate the Senior Center. Bill Coen, Margaret Clover, Bette Meisel, Pat Ducey, Jim Lapitz, and Kathleen Norris are on the committee. The commit- tee will evaluate various areas of the Senior Center, utilizing the So3 SENIOR CENTER COMM__j1ON JANUARY 12, 1984 PAGE 3 National Council on the Aging Senior, Center Guidelines as a standard for the evaluation. Meisel noted that results of the evaluation will be featured in the April issue of the Post. CITY COUNCIL CRITERIA FOR THE SENIOR CENTER COMMISSION: Commission members agreed that the City Council criteria for Senior Center Commission appointments should not -include a statement that applicants must be eligible to use the Center. Age should not be a factor when deciding Commission appointments. Meisel and Coen will contact the Mayor regarding this issue. Z•&M7� lYDvi1J�S:`Y�F Bette Meisel reviewed the usage totals for November and December. She noted that the weekend counts will be made at 12:30, 1:30 and 2:30 beginning in February. Ora Crites asked if more activities could be planned on Saturdays. Meisel explained that the Senior Center is opened mainly on weekends due to the congregate meal program and there is not enough staff to expand programming to include weekends. Bette Meisel said that results from a recent survey demonstrates that there is little demand for opening the mezzanine earlier than 1:00 p.m. on Saturdays and Sundays. Meisel stated that a•large sign has been put up advertising the Senior Center tour programs. There has been a great interest in the Quad Cities trip. Jackie Bess, Carl Pieper and Meisel will hold a public hearing in April to gather input about planning future tours. Margaret Clover inquired about the Commission's recommendations to the City Council about the congregate meal program. Meisel explained that the Council will receive those recommendations this week. Meisel said that the ceramic kiln has place. Also, RSUI will be broadcasting class on Sunday, January 15, at 8:00 p.m. been moved back to its original an interview with the chair -caning Ruth Wagner introduced Ora Crites, a Council of Elders representative. Wagner explained that the PEO organization has offered to purchase kitchen equipment for the Senior Center kitchenette. A kitchen committee has been formed to research kitchen needs and will consult with staff about the final recommendations. Commission members stressed that guidelines for clean-up and use of the kitchenette need to be established. Wagner announced that the Older Americans Day has been tentatively scheduled for May 11. A tentative theme for the fair will be "country western." Camnission members suggested keeping displays up longer than last year. Meisel suggested setting up displays in second floor rooms where they could be locked up during lunch and the program, then opened up for display after the program. -5-e,3 SENIOR CENTER COMM -ZION JANUARY 12, 1984 PAGE 4 Wagner reported that COE will jointly sponsor legislative meetings on February 18, March 17, and April 28 with the League of Women Voters Wagner stated that some cardplayers complained about the noise in the game room. Coimission members felt that the assembly roan and the congregate meal policy allowing the players to begin at 1:00 p.m. gives cardplayers ample space and time to play cards. MEETING SCHED= The Camission decided to schedule their monthly Senior Center Commission meetings on the third Thursday of each month at 9:30 a.m. Meeting adjourned at 3:50 p.m. POF-1 cn.:-: J Q. MINUTES PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MARCH 8, 1984 7:30 P.M. CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHA14BERS MEMBERS PRESENT: Horowitz, Jordan, Perry, Scott, Jakobsen, Blank, Courtney MEMBERS ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Franklin, Knight, Boyle, McCormick SUMMARY OF DISCUSSION: Chairperson Scott called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. There was no public discussion of any item not on the agenda. RECOMMENDATIONS TO CITY COUNCIL: 1. That an ordinance be approved amending the Zoning Ordinance to allow permitted uses in the RM -12 zone to be established in buildings registered on the National Register of Historic Places subject only to the require- ments specified by the Board of Adjustment; and permitting Schools i - specialized private instruction, when located in such historic struc- tures, in the RM -12 zone. 2. That the preliminary plat, POH plan and LSRD plan of Hunters Run, Parts 2-8 be approved, and that the final plat and PDH plan of Hunters Run, Parts 2 and 3, be approved subject to final approval of legal papers and construc- tion plans. (S-8404.) 3. That the rezoning of 3.52 acres from IO -RS to RS -5 be approved subject to submission of a written agreement with the final plat, agreeing that no building would take place on Lots 73-78 and Lot 80 until the sewer morato- rium was lifted. (Z-8401.) 4. That the preliminary subdivision plat of First and Rochester Addition, Part 2, located north of Rochester Avenue and east of First Avenue be approved. (5-8407.) 5. That the rezoning of certain property located at 524 North Johnson Street from P to RM -12 be approved. (Z-8403.) . 6. That the preliminary plat of Briar Ridge, Parts I -III be approved. (5-8411.) 7. That the final plat of Briar Ridge, Part I, be approved, subject to the approval of legal papers. final construction plans, signatures and any changes required by the County Zoning Commission. (5-8410.) ZONING ITEMS: 1. Public discussion of an amendment to Section 36-11 (RM -12) of the Zoning Ordinance to provide for schools - specialized• private instruction as a special exception and to allow for development with relaxed restrictions in historic structures. so el :I Planning S Zoning Commission March 8, 1984 Page 2 Knight delivered three drafts of ordinance amendments to the Commission. He explained that draft i1 allowed for schools - specialized private instruc- tion as a special exception if they were located in buildings registered on the National Register of Historic Places and subject only to the require- ments specified by the Board of Adjustment and the issuance of a certifi- cate of appropriateness by the Historic Preservation Commission according to the procedures of Section 36-53. Draft t2 expands on draft f1 to clarify that all zoning requirements may be waived by the Board including but not limited to off-street parking, yards, or any other requirement which the Board deems appropriate. Draft 33 permits schools -specialized private instruction as a special exception in the RM -12 zone without additional conditions. Knight stated that all three versions apply only to the R44-12 zone. Scott stated that in order for Preucil school to either enlarge its present building or buy additional property the zoning requirements would have to be changed to permit schools - specialized private instruction in the RM -12 zone. Knight stated that ordinances 1 and 2 were essentially the same and apply only to historic structures listed on'the National Register of Historic Place (i.e. the old Czech hall), and would not permit expansion of the school to any non -historic structure. The third draft would permit schools -specialized private instruction as a special exception in any structure in an RM -12 zone. If one of the ordinances is approved, the next step for the applicant would be to apply to the Board of Adjustment for a special exception. The Board of Adjustment would have a public hearing regarding public interest questions and the impact of the use on surround- ing property, etc. Public discussion: Nancy MacFarlane, 943 Iowa Avenue, questioned the current zoning for the Preucil school. Scott stated that it was currently zoned "P" (public) incorrectly, because the area was included with the Horace Mann school and the park. He stated that prior to the rezoning to P it was zoned R-3. MacFarlane questioned the difference in zoning between R-3 and the current considerations to rezone that area RM -12. Knight stated that they were basically the same zone and that the zoning would allow low density multi -family development. MacFarlane asked if Preucil School was a con- forming use before the adoption of the new Zoning Ordinance. Knight stated that the Preucil School was previously designated as an institution which was permitted in an R3 zone but that the school now falls into the classi- fication of schools for specialized private instruction, and under that classification is not allowed in any residential zone. Knight explained that Preucil School was not allowed to expand previously because of non-compliance with the parking requirements. The Commission is now considering an addition to the ordinance which would allow schools -specialized private instruction by special exception in the RM -12 zone. Knight stated that the Preucil school was currently non -conforming in use and could not expand due to its status as a non -conforming use and its non-compliance with the parking requirements. MacFarlane stated that she was in favor of Preucil's application. SD�4 Planning & Zoning Commission March 8, 1984 Page 3 Horowitz asked if the off-street parking required for the Preucil School could be located an the second property which the school was proposing to buy. Knight stated that according to law the school would have to provide off-street parking for expansion. He stated that if the school purchased the additional property, parking could be provided there to satisfy the parking requirements for the Preucil school if a special exception for off-street parking on a separate lot was granted by the Board of Adjust- ment. Bruce Haupert, 536 Mahaska Court, Iowa City, questioned whether draft f3 of the proposed ordinance would help Preucil's parking problem. Knight stated that it does not specifically provide for a waiver. Haupert stated that under draft t3 a waiver of the parking requirements would be needed for the excavation of the basement or else it would still require off-street parking. He also pointed out that effectively Preucil school could not use the nearby house unless the draft 63 was passed. Knight stated that this was true and pointed out that the Commission could combine any of the three ordinances if they wished to do so. He stated that the provisions in drafts 1 and 2 were intended to address the uniqueness of historic structures. Mr. Haupert stated that Preucil school does require more space for its current enrollment and that an increase in the number of students enrolled is not expected. He also observed that there currently exists an informal agreement between Horace Mann School for the use of their parking lot after school hours. However, a formal agreement could not be negotiated due to legal liabilities. Jakobsen questioned how many spaces would be made available with the additional property. Haupert stated that the lot was a•90 foot by 80 foot lot. Jakobsen remarked that parking requirements would have to be waived prior to any expansion at the existing school. Haupert stated that the maximum 50% waiver permitted by special exception would not do any good because there was still no parking availble. He stated that excavation of the basement was horrendously expensive for Preucil school and the purchase of the neighboring property seemed the most economically feasible solution. Courtney questioned whether purchase of the additional house would elimi- nate the need to excavate the basement in the future. Sonia Zeithamel, a faculty member of Preucil school, stated that if the house were purchased and Preucil school intended to excavate the basement the house would only be used for housing faculty. Blank stated that she believed if the people were instructors and lived in the house they could teach there as a home occupation. Mr. David Rust of 2020 Ninth Street in Coralville stated that he had just recently purchased the house on 523 East Church Street and is in favor of Precuil's attempts at expansion. He stated that he was looking forward to being a neighbor near the school. Mr. Ralph Neuzil, attorney for Mr. and Mrs. Robert Gaffey, stated that he did not feel there was any dispute with the reputation of Preucil school. However, he stated that there have been parking problems in that area and that Preucil should be required to adhere to the parking requirements. He stated that on recital nights parking becomes a major problem and that the Commission must consider the parking problems of those neighbors in the area. 50 el— Planning & Zoning Commission March 8, 1984 Page 4 Mr. Gaffey, 529 Church Street, stated that he was opposed to the zoning ordinance amendments. He felt that too many special exceptions had been granted in that area. He did not feel that the purchase of the home would solve the parking problem due to the fact that any additional parking made available would be used by the faculty living in the home. Mr. John Maxwell, 521 Church Street, stated that he had an eight stall lot for himself and his tenants. He stated that there is a problem with double parking and parking on both sides of the streets. He explained that between his building and the church there is a blind spot when cars park on both sides of the street. He observed that a child may get hurt if the problem persists. Mr. Paul Paulson of 525 North Johnson Street stated that he owns two buildings, one at 525 North Johnson and one at 519. He stated that there have been many times when he could not get in his own driveway and that frequently parents were unloading children in the middle of the street. He also observed that he did not see any parking relief provided by the additional property. He stated that it was virtually impossible to park in front of his own home on many occasions, and that during concerts people parked on both sides of the streets. He felt that a fire truck could not get through if there was an emergency during those times. Horowitz questioned whether or not Mr. Paulson felt that the school and the work that the Preucils did was an asset to the neighborhood. Mr. Paulson stated yes he did. Horowitz stated that she had concerns with what would happen to the building if the Preucils were forced out and the building was left abandoned. She stated that she felt this was a problem equal to the parking problem. Mr. Paulson stated that he believed the Preucils knew the parking problems when they bought the school and that the City Council allowed that purchase knowing the parking situation. Courtney stated concern over whether or not the Preucils intended to increase enrollment. He stated that if no expansion took place, the existing problem would not be alleviated but that the possible eight spots of parking with the purchased house would help the situation. He ques- tioned whether or not the parking problem increased when parking at Mercy became unavailable. Mr. Paulson stated that he felt the problem in this area was too far away from Mercy to be caused by the lack of Mercy parking. Courtney contended that when Mercy opened their parking ramp, the situation would be alleviated to some degree. Ralph Neuzil stated that he felt the school should be permitted to stay there and that they had a right to be there, however, to allow for any expansion would be to expand the parking problems. He suggested that the Commission consider providing for an exception to let the school be as it is without change. Knight stated that there would be no ordinance required for the school to remain as it is and that it could stay there indefinitely as a noncon- forming use. He reiterated that if this Commission adopted the amendment to the ordinance there would still be another hearing process with the Board of Adjustment and that the Baord would look closely at the concerns of the neighbors. Planning & Zoning Commission March 8, 1984 Page 5 Sonia Zeithamel of Route 3, Iowa City, stated that she was a faculty member at Preucil school. She stated that she felt there has been an increased parking problem due to Mercy's expansion. She also stated that the school does not run classes day and night. There is a preschool in the morning with eight children and that late afternoon was the time when the school has the most children. She also stated that a loading zone had been arranged in front of the school to help the problem with dropping children off in the middle of the street. She stated that she had frequently gone to the school early in the morning and found the street full of cars however there was no one teaching at that hour. She explained that the Preucil School has no intent of expanding the student body. There was currently an enrollment of 400 students, however, that was not the number present at the school every day. She stated that there was room for eight lessons or two to three classes. She contended that in addition to Preucil that there was parking problems with regards to soccer games at the park and church functions. She also stated that the Preucil school is a member of the National Music School Guild which promotes a neighborhood concept. Mr. Bob Rhodes of 2836 Friendship stated that he had purchased an apartment house one block from this site. He raised concerns with parking made available in back of the purchased home and felt if there was any parking in the alley they would not be able to get out. Mr. Donald MacFarlane of 943 Iowa Avenue stated that he felt the whole of Iowa City had a parking problem. He felt that the Preucil's were trying to alleviate the parking problems by buying the home. Gertrude Englert of 413 East Church stated that on Church Street there was no parking permitted on either side during the day. She wondered where the parking would be provided if the home were purchased. Knight stated that the parking would be in the rear yard. Ms. Englert stated that she had concerns with parking in ,the alley also. Mrs. C. White of 11 Brickwood Knoll stated that even if the school didn't exist at all she felt that parking would be a problem on that street. She felt that the parking problems have increased with Mercy's building project and that the Preucils were not trying to add to the parking problem but trying to alleviate the problem. She stated that the Preucil's number one concern was maintaining quality in their teaching and that if this parking problem cannot be alleviated there would be no guarantee of the Preucils staying. Horowitz questioned whether or not all the parents of the students were aware of the issues and zoning problems. She felt that if they were they might be willing to work out parking solutions. She suggested that perhaps the neighbors and the parents work together to solve the parking problem. Mrs. Helen Finken of 510 Brown Street stated that she felt there was a need for the school and the neighborhood to talk about the parking problems. She suggested that the Commission consider moving this on to another level: of discussion at the Board of Adjustment. 50Y-' Planning & Zoning Commission March 8, 1984 Page 6 Agnes Deraad of 1143 Penkridge Drive stated that she frequently brings her child to the Preucil school. She stated that she tried to park in the Horace Mann lot and if that was full she would then park farther away from the school in consideration of the neighbors. She stated that she would be willing to park even farther away if it would help the situation. Lorraine Frost of 701 Oaknoll Drive observed that when Mercy Hospital opens their parking facility it should help alleviate the parking problem. She also commented that Iowa City does so much to get businesses to come here, and that one great asset is Preucil School. We should, therefore, try to give it as much support as possible. Jakobsen moved to approve draft A2. Horowitz seconded the motion. Jordan commented that the Commission should deal with the issue of whether to permit the expansion of the school into a second property. This would allow the Preucils to make a decision on the purchase of the property. Scott suggested they vote on draft i2 first and then address the second property. Jakobsen noted that draft 62 does not deal with the issue of the property across the street on Church Street. Scott stated that historical struc- tures present a unique problem in any community and that there is value to the community in retaining the viability of an historical structure. He stated that if we are going to do that we must allow conversion to other uses. He pointed out that similar circumstances existed at the. old railroad depot and in older churches that are abandoned as church uses. He stated that draft copies 1 and 2 deal with the dilemma of the Preucil school and other historic structures; it allows them to go through the process of approaching the Board of Adjustment with the possibility of the Board waiving parking requirements. He stated that he supported draft f2 for two reasons: one, its applicability to the uniqueness of an historical structure; and two, the possibility that additional classrooms with no additional parking could be permitted if the Board of Adjustment allowed the special exception. The motion to approve draft i2 passed unanimously. Jordan moved to approve draft A3 amending the Zoning Ordinance to allow schools - specialized private institution - in the RM -12 zone. The motion was seconded by Perry. Jordan stated that he was against this ordinance. He recognized that the Preucil school was a good school however if this amendment were made now, any school for specialized private instruction, as defined, could be allowed in the RM -12 zone. Perry reiterated Jordan's concerns. He stated that they all recognize that the Preucil school is an excellent school, but he did not feel the school was being forced out. by denying this ordinance. Horowitz stated that she was neither against the draft nor for it. She suggested that the ordinance be amended so that another Property which was not an historic structure could be subject to the same review and waivers by the Board of Adjustment as an historic structure, if the additional property is auxiliary to the historic structure. Scott stated that if the adjoining property of an historical structure was contiguous, the lots SDi/ Planning & Zoning Commission March 8, 1984 Page 7 could be joined and the adjacent lot could be used as parking. Horowitz was concerned about conditions in which the property was not contiguous. Scott stated that there would have to be limitations on the distance of the auxiliary structure from the historic structure. Horowitz suggested amending the motion to permit those uses in an RM -12 zone as she had outlined. Jakobsen stated that this issue was too technical to deal with at this meeting and that the Preucils must have some decision tonight. She stated that this idea was too far reaching. Horowitz stated that she felt they were not changing the nature of the auxiliary property in the RM -12 zoned area. Jakobsen stated that in effect they would be changing the concept and that the Historic Preservation Commission should make those recommendations to Planning and Zoning. Horowitz moved to amend the ordinance to allow the same use in another building if the use was permitted in an historic building. There was no second and the motion died. Courtney stated that if schools - generalized private instruction were allowed in an RM -12 zone then the Commission should allow specialized schools also. He felt that this was a town of education and that the schools needed to be some place. Scott stated that he had vacillated all week on approving this ordinance. He felt that the impact of this amendment would not only affect Preucil but all those areas in the City zoned RM -12. He was therefore opposed to this draft. The motion to approve draft three amending the zoning ordinance to allow Schools - specialized private instruction in the RM -12 zone failed, 3-4. The meeting recessed at 9:40 and resumed at 9:50. SUBDIVISION ITEMS: S-8404. Public discussion of an application submitted by Hunters Run Develop- ment Company for approval of the preliminary plat, Planned Development Housing (POH) plan and Large Scale Residential Development (LSRD) plan of Parts 2-8 and final plat and POH plan of Parts 2 and 3, of Hunters Run Subdivision, located one-half mile west of Mormon Trek Boulevard along the north side of Rohret Road. Knight stated that the only remaining issue was the question of parkland dedication. Knight explained that Dennis Showalter was concerned because the most desirable piece of land to be dedicated would not be dedicated until later: He wished to have that piece tied to this piece in some way. Knight stated that he had discussed the issue with Dick Boyle and it was the staff's feeling that the preliminary PAD was sufficient to ensure that the additional piece of desirable parkland was obtained. He stated that the developers need the acreage represented by that piece to meet their density requirements for the whole plan. Also, he stated that the preliminary PAD plan does not expire in 18 months like the plat does so that the parkland is set and can be changed only by an amendment to the plan. Staff recommended approval subject to final approval of legal papers and construction plans. Jordan moved to approve the preliminary plat and plan for Hunters Run, Parts 2-8. The motion was seconded by Perry. SG � Planning & Zoning Commission March 8, 1984 Page 8 Jakobsen moved to approve the final plat and the PDH plan, Parts 2 and 3 of Hunters Run subject to final approval of legal papers and construction plans. The motion was seconded by Jordan. The motions passed unanimously. ZONING ITEM: Z-8401. Public discussion of an application submitted by Plum Grove Acres, Inc., for the rezoning of 3.52 acres from 10 -RS to RS -5; 45 -day limitation period: 3/10/84. Franklin stated that the rezoning was for 3.5 acres east of Tamarack Place, shown on the plat. She stated that the Commission needed to recommend approval of the rezoning if they were going to approve the subdivision as it had been submitted since the lots platted met the area requirements of the RS -5 zone and not the ID -RS zone. A note is provided on the subdivision plat which indicates that those lots east of Tamarack Place, except for Lot 79, would not be devel- oped until the sewer moratorium is lifted. Franklin pointed out that this note was necessary since the 3.52 acres went beyond the 20 acres which Plum Grove Acres was permitted to develop, under a previous agreement, without violating the moratorium. Scott questioned whether the legal department is satisfied with the note on the preliminary plat. Boyle stated he would feel more comfortable with a written agreement however the note would probably be enough insofar as the preliminary plat was concerned. Scott stated then that part of the motion should include the condition that a written agreement be submitted with the final plat and questioned the staff as to why the rezoning was requested. Franklin stated that the subdivision design, independent of the sewer issue, was good; if the rezoning were not approved, those lots east of Tamarack Place would need to be platted later and the eastern boundary of the subdivision pulled back to Tamarack Place. Blank moved to rezone 3.52 acres from IO -RS to RS -5 subject submission with the final plat of a written agreement that building not begin until the sewer moratorium was lifted. The motion was seconded by Horowitz. The motion passed unanimously. Jordan asked when the bridge across Ralston Creek would be done. Franklin stated that MMS Consultants had 60 days from March 5th to submit a design for a box culvert bridge to the City; bids would then be let and construction begun by the end of June, with completion expected by the end of summer. SUBDIVISION ITEM: S-8407. Public discussion of an application submitted by Plum Grove Acres, Inc., for approval.of a preliminary subdivision plat of First and Rochester, Part 2, 18.84 acres north of Rochester Avenue and east of First Avenue ex- tended; 45 -day limitation period: 3/26/84. 50 i1 Planning b Zoning Commission March 8, 1984 Page 9 Franklin stated that there are no deficiencies on the plat. The question of drainage for the 100 year storm had been resolved by adding a note to the plat stating the necessary storm sewers and graded channels with easements will be provided. The easterly street is named Tamarack Place; this could be changed at this time or at some later date. Courtney moved to approve S-8407 as submitted. The motion was seconded by Blank. The motion passed unanimously. ZONING ITEM: Z-8403. Public discussion of a City -initiated application for the rezoning of certain property at 524 North Johnson Street from P to RM -12. Horowitz moved that the property at 524 North Johnson Street be rezoned from P to RM -12. Jordan seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. SUBDIVISION ITEM: S-8410 and S-8411. Public discussion of an application submitted by William Panje, et al, for approval of a preliminary subdivision plat for Briar Ridge, Parts 1-3, and approval of the final subdivision plat for Briar Ridge, Part 1, located south of the Coralville Reservoir and east of Prairie du Chien; 45 -day limitation period: 3/25/84; 60 -day limitation period: 4/9/84. Franklin stated that the discrepancies between the preliminary and final plats had been taken care of. She stated that the preliminary plat is in order. The legal papers have been submitted for the final plat but have not been approved. Staff recommends approval of the final plat subject to approval of legal papers and construction plans and the provision of the necessary signatures. Jakobsen moved to approve S-8411, the preliminary plat for Briar Ridge subject to any changes made by the County Zoning Commission. The motion was seconded by Jordan. The motion passed unanimously. Jakobsen moved to approve the final plat, Briar Ridge Part 1, subject to approval of legal papers, final construction plans, signatures to be placed on the plat and any changes made by the County Zoning Commission. The motion was seconded by Perry. The motion passed unanimously. OTHER BUSINESS: Horowitz moved that this Commission recommend to the Historic Preservation Commission that the future viability of buildings to be considered for place- ment on, or those already on, the National Register of Historic Places be evaluated in terms of the need to waive certain requirements for structures auxiliary to the historic structure which are not historic in their own right. Scott questioned whether the Historic Preservation Commission should be responsible for suggesting ordinance language or whether the Planning 8 Zoning Commission should propose language. Knight suggested that Planning b Zoning propose the language to, the Historic Preservation Commission. Scott requested that the staff formulate a proposal for the Historic Preservation Commission. Franklin observed that given existing work items, this could not be done Immediately. Scott indicated that it should be done when time permitted. Soy Planning & Zoning Commission March 8, 1984 Page 10 Jakobsen stated that she had some comments to make regarding the Project GREEN proposal to Council. She explained that she felt the committee proposed should be a subcommittee of the Planning and Zoning Commission. Scott stated that if the Council were going to serve on the Urban Environment Committee they would probably make it their subcommittee. He expressed some reservation about spending a great deal of this Commission's time developing something and then having to start over when the City Council reviewed it. Franklin stated that the resolution creating the committee outlined objectives broader in scope than Project GREEN had defined in their letter. She stated that other commissions besides Planning and Zoning could be involved, including the Riverfront and Historic Preservation Connissions and that techniques may be used which are not something dealt with primarily by Planning and Zoning. Jakobsen stated her disappointment in Project GREEN for not bringing the idea directly to the Planning and Zoning Commission. Scott read a letter from the CCN to him requesting input from the Planning and Zoning Commission on the community development and housing needs of Iowa City. He asked that their request be put on the agenda for the next meeting. Franklin asked if the Commission wished the City Manager to pursue the question of the ownership of the vcated right-of-way near Orchard Court. The Commission responded no. Knight proposed a schedule for the sign ordinance. He asked whether the Commission would consider reviewing this ordinance at extra meetings or if they would deal with the sign ordinance at their regularly scheduled meetings. Scott stated that he thought it was appropriate to handle the sign ordinance the same as the zoning ordinance was handled and that perhaps the Commission could set up one night during off weeks for discussion of the sign ordinance. Knight stated that the staff would also be meeting with the Chamber of Commerce to discuss the proposed changes. Scott stated that he and Courtney would attend those meetings as representatives of the Commission to begin familiarizing themselves with the ordinance. The meeting was adjourned at 10:45, p.m. Minutes submitted by Colleen McCormick. Approved by: Horst Jordan, Secretary 5d f