HomeMy WebLinkAbout1984-09-11 Bd Comm. minutes3F' '_1
MINUTES
IOWA CITY HUMAN RIGHTS COM14ISSION
JULY 23, 1984
SENIOR CENTER CLASSR0014 - 7:30 PM
MEMBERS PRESENT: Jordison, Reed, Hawkins, Futrell, Bell, Burnside
MEMBERS ABSENT: Gill, Felton, Barcelo
STAFF PRESENT: Williams, Klein
RECOMMENDATIONS TO CITY COUNCIL:
The Commission in their effort to become as educated asblewijon lthe 'theeorya
and practice of testing and auditinglocal housing practices
State civil rights employee to their next meeting. This employee will describe
how testing has been used in Des Moines. The Human Rights Commission invites
the City Council to this meeting so they too can become more informed about
this issue.
RECOMMENDATIONS TO CITY MANAGER OR STAFF:
The Human Rights Commission requests an opinion from the legal department
regarding the advantages of having someone from legal attend conciliation
meetings.
SUMMARY OF RELEVANT DISCUSSION:
1. The meeting was called to order at 7:35 PM by Chairperson S. Futrell.
2 Jordison seconded by moved
Hawk ns. Theapprove
motion minutes
carried unanimously.184. The motion was
3. There was no public discussion.
4. Complaints Pending
E/R, B-28-8103. Burnside (Chair). Burnside reiterated how she had met
with the Respondent and the Respondent's attorney and things looked
favorale. Moe dollarb remedy rcouldobe tcalculated. Alsuccessful lected so tconciliahat the iappropriate
n looks
likely.
E/R, 11-4-8307. Futrell (Chair), Barcelo, Felton. The team met twice
with the Complainant and twice with the Respondent. The Respondent
reaffirmed to Futrell on 7/23/84, his decision to go forth with a
public hearing. Futrell, spoke on behalf of the team and apprised the
Commission of their recommendation to hold a public hearing. Futrell
then seconded.ed Futrell hat apdiscussedulic rthe merbe its
offor
thethis
case. The omotion
rdison
carried unanimously.
a
b
c
cause. TheO1. appropriate Burnside letters have been mailednd they found probable
ived the
e.
d detwill
ermine after theeCtommiseam sion meeting ust ywhen they will cameet to
review
the merits of the case.
14 93
Iowa City Human Rinhts Commission
July 23, 1984
Page 2
4. There are four cases in legal.
5. Two complaints were closed with No Probable Cause determinations.
6. Another case was recommended for a public hearing: E/S and R, 12-12-8301.
Jordison recommended this case go to public hearing. Burnside seconded the
motion. Jordison discussed the merits of the case, and a part of
Jordison's discussion included a description of the conciliation meeting.
Hawkins asked if the Commissioners considered it unfair for Respondents to
have their attorneys present during these conciliation meetings while the
conciliation team met without representation. Burnside responded and
indicated Respondents cannot be denied their right to representation and
the conciliation team must dig their heels in and stay in control. The
Commissioners then voted on Jordison's motion. The motion passed unani-
mously.
7. Community Education - Klein described the three major new activities:
a. Klein plans to organize a sexual harassment workshop and will ask the
Rape Victim Advocacy Program (RVAP) to assist her. The program will be
designed to address the needs and concerns of local employers and may
be given at the public library. Although another location will be
pursued if Klein decides to make this a workshop/luncheon event. The
presentation will be approximately one hour and the objective is to
raise the consciousness of the employers regarding how to deal with
sexual harassment in the work place. Burnside questioned the antici-
pated turnout. Klein was not certain. Williams suggested Klein work
with the Chamber of Commerce.
b. Klein plans on developing and distributing a questionnaire which will
solicit information on the effectiveness of the Commission's outreach
program.
c. Klein plans on developing a show for Cable TV, possible in an interview
format.
Futrell asked what response if any had been received thus far to the
Commission's upcoming human rights award. So far, reported staff, three
organizations and one individual have been nominated. Suggestions were
given on who to contact for additional nominations: John Watson and Peg
McElroy (Anne Burnside will contact both), Maris Schneider (Nancy Jordison
will contact). The discussion ended with Futrell suggesting one award be
given to a business and one to an individual. The Commissioners agreed
with that suggestion.
B. Old Business
a. Testing and Auditing - Klein expressed how encouraged she felt after
reading the Fayette Housing Report which described how an auditing
program had been successfully used for educational purposes. Futrell
described the recent informal Council meeting she had attended. She
reported the City Council unanimously agreed to participate in HUD's
Type II Program per the proposal submitted by the Iowa Civil Rights
Commission. Klein recommended Kevin Pokorny from the State Civil
/69U
Iowa City Human Rir�-ts Commission
July 23, 1984
Page 3
Rights Commission visit with the Commission during their August meeting
to further discuss testing and auditing. Pokorny has done testing for
the State Commission. Hawkins suggested the City Council members also.
be invited to the Commission August meeting.
b. Handicapped Assessibility - Reports
Burnside/Futrell - will complete their portion by August 15.
Hawkins - 95% complete, and thus far has received several favorable
comments from people who feel this community is doing fine within the
area of handicapped assessibility.
Jordison - has only one building left to survey.
Reed - has surveyed 4 out of 40 buildings.
Completed surveys should be given to either Williams or Felton by
August 15, 1984.
9. New Business
a. There are currently no blatantly illegal housing classified ads running
in the DI. There had been, and it was handled by first calling and
then sending a letter to the apartment manager informing them of the
new ordinance. The ad is no longer running. The Commissioners compli-
mented Klein on the tone and content of the letter sent to the apart-
ment manager that had been in violation of the new ordinance. Commis-
sioners decided future infractions should be handled in a similar
manner, first a phone call followed by a letter. Burnside suggested a
blanket statement depicting what constitutes a legal classified ad be
given to the appropriate person at the Press -Citizen.
b. Other ads which have language which implicates discrimination against a
protected class, such as an ad that says "students preferred" which
implicates age discrimination, will be handled on a case by case
basis.
10. The staff report was discussed.
11. Jordison moved to adjourn at 8:55 PM.
The minutes were taken by Phyllis Williams.
MINUTES
IOWA CITY AIRPORT COMMISSION
AUGUST 22, 1984
IOWA CITY CIVIC CENTER
MEMBERS PRESENT: Schmeiser, Tiffany, Saeugling, George, Lewis
STAFF PRESENT: Zehr, Brown
GUESTS PRESENT: D. Houston, B. Byers, P. Leff, B. Plum, E.K. Jones, D.
Gordon
The meeting was called to order at 8:00 a.m.
Zehr read the resolution authorizing execution of the option agreement with
Autohaus leasing a minimum of five acres of real estate located between the
approach end to runways 35 and 30. Brown reviewed the changes in paragraph 1
and paragraph 3 of the option agreement. It was moved by Saeugling, seconded
by Tiffany, to authorize execution of the option agreement. The motion
carried.
It was moved by George, seconded by Lewis, to execute the rezoning of three
separate parcels of airport property: 1) a parcel of land adjacent to Highway
218 running from south of the end of runway 30 to east of the end of runway 35,
to be rezoned intensive comnercial (CI -1); 2) a parcel of land located in the
northeast corner of the airport between the end of runway 17 and the end of
runway 24, to be rezoned community commercial (CC -2); 3) a parcel of land
located in the northwest corner of the airport west of the end of runway 17, to
be rezoned general industrial (I-1). Motion passed.
It was moved by George and seconded by Tiffany to execute an amendment to the
December 2, 1980, corporate hangar lease with Hansen Lind Meyer, P.C., to
delete a phrase in paragraph 20 of the said lease which prohibits the lessee
from bringing fuel onto the airport. Brown explained that the language in the
lease is consistent with the 1964 grant agreement, the master lease for the
flying service, and the airport chapter of the City Code. The motion passed.
It was moved by Tiffany and seconded by George to execute an amendment to the
December 2, 1980, corporate hangar lease with McCabe Equipment, Inc., to delete
a phrase in paragraph 20 of the said lease which prohibits the lessee from
bringing fuel onto the airport. Brown stated that the lessee will be notified
of the amendment to the lease. Zehr said that Denny Knowling has been notified
of the change. The motion passed.
It was moved by George and seconded by Tiffany to execute an amendment to the
December 2, 1980, corporate hangar lease with the Iowa City Flying Service to
delete a phrase in paragraph 20 of said lease which prohibits the lessee from
bringing fuel onto the airport. In response to E.K. Jones, Brown said that it
14 not necessary to hold a public hearing to amend the lease. The motion
passed.
Brown stated that no action is needed regarding bringing fuel onto the airport
in the May 14, 1981, corporate hangar lease with the Iowa City•Flying Service.
Meeting adjourned at 8:20 a.m.
16 YY
MINUTES
RESOURCES CONSERVATION COMMISSION
JULY 9, 1984 - 7:30 P.M.
CIVIC CENTER LAW LIBRARY
MEI4BERS PRESENT: Singerman, Vogel, Nychay, Parsons, Levy at 8:40 p.m.
MEMBERS ABSENT: McPeak, Gartland
STAFF PRESENT: Helling
RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL:
Nychay moved and Vogel seconded that the Commission recommend to the City
Council that the consultant employed by the .City to evaluate the Sewage
Systems Facilities Plan be directed to conduct a feasibility study regarding
the capture, scrubbing, and use of methane gas generated at the treatment
facility, to be used by the City or sold to another user, possibly the
University of Iowa. Motion carried 5-0.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
The minutes of the meeting of May 14, 1984, were approved by consensus with
the following amendment:
Under OTHER BUSINESS insert a third paragraph as follows:
Specific questions raised by Nychay to which staff will attempt to obtain
answers include: What is the configuration of the methane gas at the
Wastewater Treatment Plant, and more specifically, the BTU content?
What specific problems has the City of Ames experienced with regard to
their waste -to -energy facility or with the use of fuel pellets? What is
the potential for the University of Iowa as a consumer of fuel pellets?
Who are the users of hazardous chemicals in Iowa City?
A discussion of the above questions and others which have been raised
followed. Helling will attempt to determine if the former energy coordinator
madeinquiries regarding the above or if he received any responses to the
list of questions to be submitted to Enviro Consultants.
Vogel indicated that personnel at the Oakdale facility had indicated a
willingness to analyze methane to detect the presence of heavy metals or
other contents. He also brought a questionnaire from Getty Synthetic Fuels
Inc, regarding information on landfills that they will need in order to
determine the feasibility of mining for methane gas. Helling will attempt to
initiate the response process.
Melling will check with the Pollution Control Superintendent to obtain
clarification regarding the basis for the $85,000 figure contained in a memo
of June 15, 1984, to Phil Nychay.
/�f5
Resources Conservation Commission
July 9, 1984
Page 2
Nychay moved and Vogel seconded that the Commission recommend to the City
Council that the consultant employed by the City to evaluate the Sewage
Systems Facilities Plan be directed to conduct a feasibility study regarding
the capture, scrubbing, and use of methane gas generated at the treatment
facility, to be used by the City or sold to another user, possibly the
University of Iowa. Motion carried 5-0.
Commission members requested copies of the 1916 Veenstra & Kimm report which
Nychay had previously obtained.
OTHER BUSINESS:
Nychay suggested that a letter be sent to the City of Ames regarding problems
with its waste -to -energy facility as well as whatever advantages that City
perceives. Helling agreed to contact the appropriate personnel there.
Nychay moved and Vogel seconded that the Commission recommend to the City
Council that a letter be sent to Roger Coulton regarding the recent court
judgment in the case filed against Iowa -Illinois Gas & Electric. Nychay will
draft a letter for the next Commission meeting and, upon approval, the letter
will be forwarded to the City Council.
Commission members requested copies of the recently approved Industrial
Revenue Bond Policy.
The next meeting will be the second Monday in August.
Meeting adjourned at approximately 9:10 p.m.
Tom Gartland, Secretary.
Minutes prepared by: Dale Helling, Assistant City Manager.
MINUTES
IOWA CITY PUBLIC LIBRARY
BOARD OF TRUSTEES
REGULAR MEETING
AUGUST 23, 1984
4:00 PM - LIBRARY CONFERENCE ROOM
MEMBERS PRESENT: Bovbjerg, Cavitt, Drum, Grimes, Pegnetter, Willis, Zastrow
MEMBERS ABSENT: Gritsch, Lyman
STAFF PRESENT: Eggers, Tiffany, Jehle, Craig, Spaziani
OTHERS PRESENT: Gladys Benz; Pat Forsythe, Foundation Coordinator;
Steve Gerard, FRIENDS liaison; Kathy Branson, U of I
Library Science student
President Cavitt called the meeting to order at 4:05 PM. Minutes of the
Regular Meeting of July. 26, 1984 were approved. Bovbjerg/Zastrow. Dis-
bursements lists of August 1 and August 15, 1984 were approved. Zastrow/
Bovbjerg.
The Board reviewed the year-end financial reports: Receipts, Expenditures,
Library Materials, Gifts and Bequests and the Photocopy (Enterprise) account
as printed in the annual report. Eggers pointed out the following:
- Fine receipts are still going up faster than circulation for a total
of $36,435 in FY1984, an 18% increase.
- Despite great efforts to increase contracts and private resources,
city funds still account for 85% of all receipts and expenditures -
85% city, 8% county, 7% gifts, fees and sales.
- The year-end unencumbered balance in the Gifts and Bequest Fund is
lower than its been for several years. Because of the increasing
complexity of the gift fund and the impact of increased expenditures
from gift monies on the number of books and other items purchased, we
will be trying some new procedures in FY85 on how the gift funds are
handled.
- This is the first year we have included a report on the Photocopy
Fund in the annual report.
The Director reported on the following:
1. Because the contract with AFSCME, Local 183 ends June 30, 1985,
negotiations will begin this fall as per letter from AFSCME repre-
sentative, Jan Corderman. Thus it is time to renew the agreement
between the Library Board and the City Council regarding joint
negotiation procedures.
2. Judy Kelley, Youth Services Coordinator, has sent a letter to all
teachers in the Iowa City Community School District reminding them
of services available to them at the Library including library
instruction tapes now played each Tuesday and Thursday at 2:30 on
Channel 20 for their convenience in teaching about the resources
of the public library.
(over)
-MINUTES
IOWA CITY PUBLIC LIBRARY
BOARD OF TRUSTEES
REGULAR MEETING
AUGUST 23, 1984
PAGE 2
3. As part of'the joint Iowa City Public Library/University of Iowa
library committee, the Information Department staff toured the
Reference Department of the University library recently. That
staff will be touring our library soon.
4. The copy of the Library's annual report sent to the Board of
Supervisors was accompanied by a letter pointing out the sections
in the report that pertained specifically to Johnson County.
5. The Library received two gifts this week: $1,000 from the Sunrise
Optimists bringing their total gift to $8,000 since 1981; $500
from the Rick Wetrich family in memory of Jennifer Wetrich. Both
gifts are for children's services or resources.
President Cavitt announced that planning is underway for a meeting with
University of Iowa Vice President for Academic Affairs, Richard Remington.
She recommended that she, Eggers and Tiffany represent the Library at
the meeting. The Board agreed.
She asked all Board members to attend and represent the Library at the
3rd annual reception for contributors to the Iowa City Public Library
Foundation to be held Sunday, September 9 at Bushnell's Turtle.
Board members were again asked to consider attending the Iowa Library
Association conference in Des Moines on Wednesday and Thursday, October
17 and 18. These two days have meetings of special interest to Trustees
and should be of benefit to anyone who makes public presentations or
raises money for any purpose. Members should decide by the September
Board meeting whether they will be able to attend.
Cavitt reminded the Board that they still need a policy or plan on
setting up an annual meeting between the Board and the FRIENDS and the
Foundation.
Steve Gerard reported for the FRIENDS. The recent booksales have been
very successful and the FRIENDS Board is meeting early in September to
discuss goals for the upcoming year.
Assistant Director Connie Tiffany reported on the status of negotiations
between the City and Heritage Communications over the purchase of the
Iowa City cable franchise. The parties are close to an agreement and
reasonable funds for continuing community access run by a non-profit
organization under contract to Heritage will probably be approved. Tiffany
asked if the Board has any questions about the material they received during
August about the sale terms or about the concepts involved in turning the
community programming center over to a non-profit group including the idea
that the Library could be that non-profit agency.
After discussion, the Board directed Tiffany to prepare a more specific
proposal regarding the possibility of the Library assuming responsibility
for access. They felt they needed more details before they could decide
if they wanted to submit such a proposal to the City. Governance was cited
/6 96
MINUTES
IOWA CITY PUBLIC LIBRARY
BOARD OF TRUSTEES
REGULAR MEETING
AUGUST 23, 1984
PAGE 3
as the most complex issue; continuity, easier administration at staff
level, better public understanding and access as a logical extension of the
Library's mission were mentioned as some of the major advantages.
The status of the lease between Hawkeye Cablevision and the Library awaits
a decision on the sale and then on who will run the community programming
center. The City legal department is working on some proposed amendments
to the lease for Heritage to agree to before the lease is assigned to them.
The issues addressed in the proposed amendments include:
- Air conditioning
- Public access staffed and open a minimum of 40 hours/week
The staff -prepared first annual report on the Board's 5 -year plan was
reviewed, especially for its impact on the FY86 budget. Target goals
for FY86 were discussed. A tentative decision was made pending more
details at the September meeting, to support more staff, a renewed
public microcomputer proposal and funds from the CIP budget for a
computer upgrade.
The Policy sub -committee chair, Ann Bovbjerg, presented the Committee's
report concerning phase two of its charge to revise by-laws and to
develop a plan for regular review and updating of Board policy state-
ments. The recommendation defined policy, how it would be developed
and reviewed and presented a three year plan for conducting the review.
The recommendations were adopted on a motion from Grimes, and seconded
by Pegnetter.
The President was authorized to sign a resolution for joint negotiations
between the Board and the City Council as presented except for a revision
to point six to read: "This agreement shall cover the period from date
of adoption through the contract coveringLibrary employees which will
begin July 1, 1985.-1 Bovbjerg/Zastrow. Unanimously approved.• The
resolutiorf is essentially the same as that adopted periodically by the
Board and Council since 1975. Copies will be forwarded to the City
Council,
Meeting adjourned at 6:08 PM.
Next Regular Meeting of the Library Board of Trustees will be Thursday,
September 27, 1984 at 4 PM in the Administrative Conference Room.
Joan Jeh e, Lo ly Egger - Recorders
/(O 9G
MINUTES
HOTEL STEERING COMMITTEE/DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE
AUGUST 15, 1984 - 7:30 P.M.
CITY COUNCIL CONFERENCE ROOM, CIVIC CENTER
STEERING COMMITTEE
MEMBERS PRESENT: Berlin, Hayek, McDonald, Amert, Wegman
STEERING COMMITTEE
MEMBERS ABSENT: Zuber
DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE
MEMBERS PRESENT: Amert, Sunnerwill, Haupert, Eckholt, Wegman, Wockenfuss
DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE
MEMBERS ABSENT: Alexander, Sinek, Lafore, Seiberling
EX -OFFICIO MEMBER PRESENT: Perret
GUESTS PRESENT: Robert Bray, Gary Korte
RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL:
1. The Committee recommends approval of two signs (one pole sign and one
facia sign) for the Holiday Inn to be placed on City -owned property. The
11 foot high pole sign would be located between the sidewalk and Dubuque
Street parking ramp. The facia sign would be placed over the entrance to
the Dubuque Street Parking Ramp.
MEETING:
Meeting was called to order at 7:35 p.m. by McDonald. It was moved by
Haupert and seconded by Hayek that the minutes from the July 12, 1984 meeting
be approved. Motion approved unanimously.
SIGNAGE:
Hauer reviewed the signs which are to be considered by the Committees at this
meeting. The first was a sign to be placed over the Dubuque Street entrance
of the Dubuque Street 'parking ramp. It would be approximately 3'x5' in size
and would read "Hotel Parking" in white script on a green background with the
Holiday Inn starburst trademark above the lettering. The second sign would
be approximately 3'x5' attached to a 8' high pole located at the corner of
Dubuque and Burlington streets. Because the signs would be located on public
property, it is necessary for the Council to approve these signs.
Hayek began the discussion by asking how necessary these signs were. McDonald
responded that he thinks back to the hotel meeting where Korte said the
corner signage was the most vital for the hotel project.
Bray said customers would be coming in from Interstate 80 and it would be
necessary to have some sort of signage on Burlington Street to direct them to
the Holiday Inn. Korte supported Bray's contention.
16 97
Hotel Steering Con,..ctee/Design Review Committee
August 15, 1984
Page 2
Haupert reviewed the signs which were to be placed on the Holiday Inn. He
noted that one of the building signs - located on the southeast elevation
-was not approved by the Committees.
Bray noted that the Holiday Inn directory traffic directions state that
customers should exit at the Dodge Street exit of Interstate -80.
Berlin said both the previously proposed monument sign which would be
approximately five feet in height and the pole sign had been reviewed
informally by the City Traffic Engineer. The Traffic Engineer indicated a
safety hazard was probably not posed by either sign. Berlin asked why the
developer's representatives were desirous of a pole sign rather than a
monument sign. Korte said the handrail on the parking ramp distorted the
appearance of a monument sign.
Bray said the proposed pole sign would read "Holiday Inn - Parking" and would
be approximately 11-13' in height. Korte said the height was needed to
eliminate the distorting appearance of the handrail and what they perceived
as a safety sight -line problem with a monument sign.
Berlin asked if they proposed to landscape the base area of the sign. Bray
indicated they were.
Perret asked exactly how high the sign was. He said that the previous
proposal showed 13 feet in height and now it appears to be 11 feet. Korte
said the monument sign was a "rash suggestion" on his part and he wished he
had not mentioned it.
Hayek asked if either the monument sign or the pole sign presented any
problems with visual obstruction of the Hawkeye State Bank signage. Korte
did not think so.
Perret questioned if there were any other private signs located on the City
right-of-way. He was extremely concerned about the precedent of locating
commercial signs on City property. Berlin responded that the University of
Iowa and Mercy Hospital had been granted permission to place signs on City
property. Perret asked if there were any for-profit entities permitted to
place signs on City property. McDonald said there were some but they were
being grandfathered out.
McDonald stated the Committee should remember that not everyone coming to the
Holiday Inn will know the City as do long-term residents of Iowa City. He
thought it was entirely necessary to offer some direction to out-of-town
visitors.
Hayek said Perret's issue of private signs located in City property is
well -taken but it had to be counter -balanced with the need to offer direction
to visitors. Hayek thought the hotel was different because it was a pri-
vate -public venture.
Sumoerwill asked if the pole sign could be attached to the ramp. Korte did
not know but was open to suggestions. He said his first choice was to have a
pole sign and then the second would be to affix a sign to the ramp.
Hotel Steering Committee/Design Review Committee
August 15, 1984
Page 3
Wegman said he had had problems in other cities trying to find parking for
hotels. He said signs are very desirable when there is traffic behind you
and you're trying to figure out where to go.
Perret asked why the Holiday Inn brochure directs customers to the Dodge
Street exit instead of the Dubuque Street exit from I-80. Bray said it was
simpler to give directions from the Dodge Street exit.
Haupert said he considered the lack, of a southeastern elevated building sign
to be in the Holiday Inn's favor when considering the street level signs. He
stated Wegman's argument was convincing to him.
Wockenfuss asked if the pole sign would be lighted from within. Both Korte
and Bray indicated it was and it was noted that the Holiday Inn starburst
trademark would also be included on the sign.
Berlin moved that one sign to be located on City property between the
sidewalk and a second sign to be placed on the Dubuque Street Parking Ramp be
approved. The pole sign would be designed as shown on sheet four of the
information submitted by the developer which shows a pole 8 feet in height
with a sign 6' in length and 3' in height be erected at this location.
Berlin also stated appropriate landscaping is to be provided around the base
of this sign. Wockenfuss seconded.
Perret asked why the sign was shown as being 6'x3' when discussion had said
it would be 5'x3'. The amendment was changed with approval of the Conmittees
to have the sign 5' in length and 3' in height.
It was discussed as to whether a directional arrow for the sign was needed.
Amert said if an arrow was added to the sign it should be well-placed within
the sign. Sumnerwill asked why the sign could not read "Hotel Entrance" with
the starburst trademark. Korte said that the Holiday Inn starburst trademark
symbol is not universally recognized. Sunmerwi11 said the graphics for
Holiday Inn system are reminiscent of the 1960s and that she hoped that they
would be less -dated if and when Holiday Inn ever changed their graphic
system.
It was agreed to by the Committees to amend Berlin's proposed motion to
include an arrow on the signage graphics. The motion as, amended was unani-
mously approved with Haupert abstaining.
OTHER BUSINESS:
Haupert noted a request had been made by the developer to change the light
pole designs for the north plaza section of the hotel. The developer had
found the City had had special light pole bases with laminated wood manufac-
tured. Because of the difficulty in manufacturing and lamination problems
with the poles, the developer wished to utilize the same light fixture and
pole design with the exception of painting the base Van Dyke brown rather
than laminating it with wood.
Haupert moved approval of this amendment of the light pole base design and
Wegman seconded. Motion approved unanimously.
1W1,71
Hotel Steering Com, ttee/Design Review Committee
August 15, 1984
Page 4
l on or by
ust
saidethereemayenotsbencompletenbeveragegandefoodeserrvice until several t
severaldays
later.
Korte said there was one issue that he wished to bring before the Committees
at this time. Holiday Inn engineers had been on-site attempting to locate
the Holiday Inn satellite reception dish. Because of existing microwave
traffic, it was not possible to locate the satellite dish on the top of the
hotel. (The satellite reception dish receives employee training films, video
teleconferencing, and movies from the Holiday Inn satellite.) Korte said a
number of reception tests had been done on different locations on the hotel
site and it appears that none of the roofs on the hotel will work for
locating the dish. Because of existing microwave and reception problems, it
is necessary to locate the dish on or near ground level. Also, the satel-
lite dish has to be placed so that it can be beamed in a southwestern
direction.
Korte presented a picture to the Committees showing placement of the dish in
the southwest corner of the hotel site next to the exterior walkway. The
Committees indicated the unacceptability of this option immediately.
Hayek asked if it was possible to place the dish somewhere on the adjacent
parking ramp. Korte said it was possible but there could be a problem with
elevation when the ramp's additional levels are built.
Korte asked the Committees for their assistance in locating the dish some-
where in the vicinity of the hotel. It was noted that this issue would have
to go before the Committees for their approval.
The meeting was adjourned by general acclaim at 8:05 p.m.
Minutes submitted by Andrea Hauer.
--*N
MINUTES
URBAN ENVIRONMENT AD HOC COMMITTEE
TUESDAY, AUGUST 14, 1984-- 4:00 P.M.
CITY MANAGER'S CONFERENCE ROOM
PRELIJNNARY
Subject 4o Approval
MEMBERS PRESENT: Amert, Baker, Jordan, Koch, Lorenzen, McGuire, Vander Woude
MEMBERS ABSENT: Brinton, Jakobsen, Strait
STAFF PRESENT: Franklin, Johnston
CALL TO ORDER:
Co -Chairperson Baker called the meeting to order at 4:05 p.m.
REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF MINUTES FOR JULY 24, 1984:
Koch moved to approve the minutes of July 24th as submitted. Jordan seconded
the motion. The motion carried unanimously with McGuire and Lorenzen
abstaining.
Baker thanked the staff for getting the minutes out early and commented it
was very much appreciated.
OF
Franklin went over the changes that were made in the "Scope of Concerns and
Policy Recommendations."
Amert stated the word "whose" was inappropriate in the first paragraph, line
3 under Environmentally Sensitive Areas. Amert also felt the word "impact"
in paragraph 4., line 2 on page 2, should not be used as a verb.
McGuire questioned why there was an absence of the word "ordinances" in the
introduction section where reference was made to implementation. Franklin
explained that an ordinance or resolution is the means by which something is
done and that regulations or incentives are that which is being done; an
ordinance is the vehicle for establishing the regulation or incentive.
Franklin said at some point this committee or another board will need to be
setup to make recommendations on the future designation of proposed areas
as "special." Property owners will want to know what committee or board will
designate areas as "special" and the mechanics involved in getting the
property designated as such.
Baker suggested that the Historic Preservation Ordinance be used as a model,
but cautioned that a similar process which required review through Planning
and Zoning and then to City Council would be too lengthy.
Koch felt it was wise to be as expedient as possible. He stated that many
builders get upset with the delay involved in getting a permit. He stated
property would be put in limbo if the process is too lengthy and felt it
wasn't good.
00
MINUTES
URBAN ENVIRONMENT , AOC COMMITTEE
TUESDAY, AUGUST 14, 1984 - 4:00 P.M.
PAGE 2
Baker questioned how property which was structurally non -conforming would be
handled if strict compliance meant a "special' area would be affected; he
cited an example at 131 E. Jefferson. The building at 131 E. Jefferson is
not presently 20 feet back from the right-of-way as khe new Vdinance
requires. He stated that if the owners had to put the building back the
required footage, the building would encroach on the area that this committee
feels should be preserved.
Koch stated he could see the possibility of lawyers in Iowa City making money
if property owners had already purchased property that was zoned the way they
wanted it to be and now the property ends up in an overlay area.
Franklin reminded the Committee that various methods could be used to manage
the "special areas" and that incentives rather regulations might be appropri-
ate in some cases.
Koch suggested the Committee consider meeting every two weeks. He said the
August 28th meeting could be to discuss implementation and designation but
that the group need not discuss the inventory list or review the areas at
that meeting.
Franklin said the next step for staff would be to define locationally the
"special" areas, survey them, take pictures and compile data for staff and
Committee evaluation. She said there are some areas, i.e. University
property, that the City cannot control and can only send a letter suggesting
what the City would like to see done or not done.
McGuire stated the University has been positive in their response to sugges-
tions made by the Riverfront Commission.
In regard to a suggested site review by the Committee, Franklin suggested
that the Committee wait until it sees the inventory sheets and then choose
what it wants to tour from that list.
Franklin said the Planning and Programming Department now subscribes to the
Planners' Advisory Service. She stated that she can request model ordinances
and programs from areas all around the country. She asked if any of the
Committee members had any suggestions.
Baker suggested requesting ordinances from Freeport, Maine, Santa Monica,
Irvine and Carmel, California.
Baker said he would like the Committee to work with Planning and Zoning on
the sign regulations. He said that he would like Iowa City to prohibit any
franchise signs and require that all signs be unique to Iowa City. He
suggested giving a 20 year amortization schedule for existing franchise
signs.
Amert said her graphic design students would love the idea because of the
jobs that would be created but felt that the proposal was not feasible. Koch
said that signage helps sell. People do identify with the signs across the
country and that the franchise signs are a means of making money.
/6 9g
MINUTES
URBAN ENVIRONMENT HOC COMMITTEE ^
TUESDAY, AUGUST 14, 1984 - 4:00 P.M.
PAGE 3
OTHER BUSINESS:
Franklin noted a referral from the City Council regarding 624 S. Gilbert
Street and the potential concern for regulating sites deemed enviFonmental
hazards. Franklin gave a brief review of the property at 624 South Gilbert
Street. She stated that plans had been received for putting a store on this
site with apartments above the store. She said that this site had experi-
enced an oil spill and would never get a totally clean bill from the state
environmental agency. Because the store was proposed to be built on a
concrete slab and there wouldn't be a basement, the state agency felt that
there should be no health problem. Jordan said that Planning and Zoning felt
that anything built on this site must be on a concrete slab and would not
endorse any building that required a basement. Everyone agreed that.anything
put in this area would be an improvement. Amert suggested adding another
paragraph under environmentally sensitive areas dealing with environmental
hazards.
Franklin then advised the Committee that they could make a statement to
Planning and Zoning either for or against the proposed rezoning of the
airport property that is currently zoned P for public use since one of their
stated areas of concern was for entranceways to Iowa City, including old 218.
She said an auto dealer wished to lease some land south of the airport on 218
and use it commercially.
Jordan stated that the land will always be zoned P but an overlay zoning
permitting commercial development could be created.
Franklin stated that the rezoning request had not formally been presented to
Planning and Zoning and that she would update the Committee when that tran-
spired.
The meeting adjourned at 5:10 p.m.
Minutes submitted by Jean Johnston.
/691F