Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1976-10-05 Regular MeetingCOMPLETE DESCRIPTION ,OF COUNCIL ACTIVITIES OCTOBER 51 1976- 7:30 P.M. The Iowa City City Council met in regular session 'on the 5th day of October, 1976, at 7:30 P.M. in the Council ` Chambers at the Civic Center. Councilmembers present were: Balmer, deProsse,'Foster, Neuhauser,'-Selzer, Vevera. 'Berret arrived at 7:35 P.M. Absent:' none:- Mayor Neuhauser-pre- siding. Mr. Thomas Anthony, 1004 Kirkwood,-appearedand pre- sented a proposal for _gmbarcro of large truck traffic -on KirkwooSl Ave. from area.residents and requested that Council takeactionon alleviating the problems caused by these trucks. City Manager Berlin stated that Section 64.64, Code of Iowa, authorizes Council to designate`' truck -routes.'' He also explained that a new model traffic code procedure would be presented in the near future. Mayor.Neuhauser stated this matter would be discussed along with the new traffic code at the end of the month. 1 $3 After City Clerk Stolfus requested that a Resolution Approving -Cigarette Permit be added to the Consent Calendar, it was moved by Foster, seconded by,Perret, that_the`follow- ing_agenda+items and recommendations 'in the Consent Calendar `be approved and/or adopted as amended: Reading of minutes of official actions of regular'Coun- cil meeting of September, 21,;1976, subject to correction, as recommended by -the City Clerk. Consider Statement from Harold Ambrose concerning change of trade name from Dirty u v_Lsto_Moody_Blue_and; addi- tion of trade name, The Fox Hole, to its corporation., Notification to;Council `of change of name for an'`estab- lishment with a beer or liquor license is required by the State • -- Minutes of Boards and Commissions: .r Comprehensive Plan _r IHSS Coord. Comm. - 9/9/76;"I.C. Housing Comm. -`9/8/76; 1'toSb' 51_C. Riverfront Comm Board of Adjust- 3-.1657 ment - 8/4/76;51.C. Parks & Rec. Comm. 9/22/76•;,(U.A.Y y ,•� Ra Bd. - 9/23/76. 6. Permit Resolutions,, recommended by City Clerk, Book 36: Res. #76-356 page 465 ` .. P g ,:approving 'Class B Beer .Permit and Res, #76-357, page 466, approving -Class B Beer sun - slay Sales forKathrynJ' Kelly dba/Maid-Rite Corner, 630 Iowa Ave.; Res. #76-358, page 467, approving,.B Beer Per- miJt andrRes.#76-359,,page`-468,approving !C1ass B=Bee Sunday-Ssa-I.es for Johg , ..u ue 69Res #76-360 ,page4 69,apv 'Class C Beer -Permit Page 2 Council Activities October 5,-1976 for Ronk, _P1r�les db/nail q, u Bas' #76 67, Page 470 P-x503, 123 [v. Benton; for.Wnman� aPProvin C1acG n r 209 N--�s_Raetanra p f, g---SZ-�� Ci a etLinn; Eipsf! 3_62 p _]4 n71_'._cibaLCra_ce &— -Rubies, 472 t e>tni-t to Central Vgndors• aPProLing; efun_ a of, 6q approving Cyget P Rte_ 76-i53� Pb q $ Resolutions: -RE S7G-364 t 64 6 SEINER-1XPRQyE j --3% Page 473, ACCEPTING SANITARY }� �S IN WEDGELPOOD APARTMENTS ]' S0ltthaate__DPse i om_Q_C ADD. as: done SL. ,enc Correspondence: Letter 197 ;control at`int from S. Winifred organ, to De b'l'£�� Gilbert & Jefferson ' re: tj� ami of Public Works; .Letter-from:Father '-'referred Hol_,h—� re Robert E Police De v1Q ti niof_private parkin Dept; Letter from Adrian referred'to Incl--sirens, - referred —Ken, of Ha to CiOYnado warn —Ppv Hollow Park with a two pet- dons, re::future.+. to Comm. Dev; 00 and 358 signatures t]°n of + Letter from James B , referred �` Q raffi•D_ 'I. a- nn ro c� S a-y- Jr. , :e: V' - Dept Letter fromt-fel_-, referred to P �'rL1LJnd cnn ^nd Pa + olice referred to Parks &—r �tons" "d. re Affirmative Rec._Dept. roll call was unanimous, all Councilmembers present: It.was noted that Council will be Rec. Comm:'s recommendation Considering Park to Pheasant to than the; Parks & Hill Park 9e the.name,Of Northeast Neuhauser appointed at the'October'12 cane Ron Bohlken meeting, °Mayor y with the term expir�in--'190o6nBroadway,;to-fill the.va- tv`edt It- moved b 4 7/5/78 the Committee prove the was appointment. y Balmer, seconded b on Communi- Y Pe/0. t',rto ap- Motion carried, 7/0• It was moved by 70 Iowa UtY=-John so o deProsse, seconded by Perret, to fund the its Present grant runsty-arts"Council with $SO per month after 4/3., Balmer out and until :June,:1977, Motion carried, Selzer, and Vevera voting ;"no"• Coun i1� . deRr /70 A Committee DEQ summarized the ;Transportation Oct_ meeting she attended Steer 1 for the National Lea in Washington, D.C. discussed included: ue'of Cities,'_She ' on Munici al Policy Pedestra.an-bicycle-safet 'stated items A } on :Trans Y and the-National portation_ - .Councilman Perret /70� velopment conference reported on the Housing & De- He- d atco the conference he attended Commun t De- pics that in Dubuque from'9/29 borhood development - 10 were discussed. included: Code-implementation' architectural barrier`removad neigh- - men with technical and financialor ation assistance. Housing and rehab 'code enforce- 4+ _._ Page 3 Council Activities October 5, 1976' The Se� 2_ request for permission for a covered 'open ing in thCLside-alk was discussed by Council.- City Attorney ' Hayek informed Council the procedure for acquisition of the alley involved identification of ownership, appraisals, nego tiations, and a possible condemnation proceeding.This,pro- cedure might take ,from three to four months to complete. After further discussion, Mayor Neuhauser asked Mr. Hayek to report to Council in one month as to how complicated this mat- ter -would be. Councilman' Selzer suggested the Engineering Dept. also investigate this matter. There were no Council ob- jections. City Attorney Hayek stated the ,nqgotiattions with Perpetual Savings & Loan and Iowa State Bank are progressing. He noted. there had been a meeting scheduled with•O1d Capitol Associates on Friday, Oct. 8. /7p Councilman Selzer expressed his concern to develop a belt - line around the City for truck traffic. City Manager=Berlin'1 indicatedhehad checked into thepossibilityof-'constructing:' a beltline to run-on Scott Blvd. from Lower Muscatine up to theLocal Road, and if the Council would wish to implement this program, its cost could _be'incorporated into _the;C.I.P. _ which will be updated in the next four months. After discus- sion, it.was-decided to"request-that-Public Works determine what right-of-way would be needed for the'beltline and also . find out whatplansthe developer has for Scott Blvd. before the C:i_P. is discussed. /7Ab Councilman Foster requested that the press releases divorce ticketing from towing, noting that -the.City is not in the towing business -- a private individual is doing the /Ti/' towing. Councilman Balmer questioned as to when the Riverfront Commission's request for information on the.acqusition'of land would be discussed. Mr. Berlin stated this matter could be determined after the funds are identified upon the City's buy-. ing out the -Federal -Government in Urban Renewal. Councilman Balmer and Councilwoman deProsse indicated they would be absent from the informal meeting.of the 18th and -Coun- cilman Balmer for the formal meeting -of the 19th.: It was moved by Selzer, seconded by deProsse, to return the amount of $4,670'($5,000 less the cost incurred by`_the City) to ConstaT:ce Merker_in reference to the house located -ons 22_E- .Court,St. :.hich she had intended to move. Then, Councilman Foster mcued, and"deProsse seconded to table the motion in or- der to,de_:ermine whether or not she shouldreceivethis amount 1713 o£ refund. ,Motion carried, 7/0. Parking OrdinancQ by providing, recourse against motor..vehicles parking on private property. He explained its two sections, impediment of private access to public way and parking upon private property. Because of Councilman..Selzer's request for time to study the ordinance, Council later came to the con- sensus to consider the ordinance October 12. City Attorney Hayek suggested Council schedule discus- sion on Bending litigation within the next month or so. There, were no Council objections. The public hearing was held on the.Planned_AiDevel ea op ment of A & H Apartments. Atty.Alan Leff appeared on behalf of the --owners of the complex and asked Council to suspend the rules and give the final vote for passage that evening.There was some discussion concerning,.accessibility for the handi- capped, with Councilman Balmer requesting information, from the City Manager as to how many apartments in Iowa City provide handicapped accessibility. It was moved by Foster, seconded by Selzer, .that the rule requiring that ordinances must be considered and voted on for passage` at,two `Council meetings prior to-the.meeting at which it is to be finally passed be suspended,' that the first and second considerations and vote,_ be waived, and that the ordinance be voted upon for final pass- age at this time. Affirmative roll call vote was unanimous,., all Councilmembers present. It was then ,moved _by Foster, sec- onded by Selzer, that ORDINANCE'76-2810, as recorded in Ord.' Book 10, pages 41-42, ESTABLISHING A PLANNED AREA DEVELOP- MENT FOR A &"H APTS.,be finally adopted at this time. -Affirma--716 tive roll call vote was unanimous, all Councilmembers/present. It was moved by Selzer,_ seconded by Balmer, to adopt RESO- LUTION 76-365, Res. Book 36, pages 474-5, ACCEPTING PRELIMI- NARY &'FINAL LSRD:.FOR A & H APARTMENTS. Affirmative roll call �7l vote was unanimous, all Councilmembers present. A gubli.c_hearing oras held to rezone three parcels, of a tract of land from R1A to R1B and R3A to>RlB (Court Hill, Scott Blvd._Add._z5). -City Engineer -Dietz, summarized his report -.._�� ....�.a.�.. ic rto1-tinn.:nhe-ad of the sewer _.. Council Activities Page 5 October 5, 1976 The public hearing was held to,rezone 'a tract of land from R3A to PC, "located on W. Benton St. (Heetit4onsfrome) Don-Pardubskv. 918 Talwyn Ct., presented a p area residents opposing this rezoning. jVillia m Buss, 747 w" nAnton St., appeared and explained a petition ofhobjectors. aeated ea addressed also presentesub d a P Richard Blum, P's Z' Commissioner the-Council'con - cernCerning their standing on this rezoning_ He explained that, although the Comprehensive Planis.ot, in eCGustavnFleers; should view this in a long -rang P eared and „nal r1_Suther�aILd, and.- 74arc' a Miller_, also, aPP - presented petitions. Others appearing included;Nancv Hellin , _�ack'Doyle Land 'Levis, and t4appearedBand eda.scusst attorney, for Heritage Square, survey. He further stated that the 'development was with- in walking distance from 'Oaknoll Retirement Residence.: It was moved by Perret, seconded by deProsse, to accept the petitions presented, including the land rs JroandeMiriam art of the public hearing.: Motion Lindhold, Dale m and em a p Levis, /7`8 Gingerich',`and make them a p lic hearing was closed. carried, 7/0. Pub Mayor Neuhauser declared a brief recess at 10;30 P.M. A wuy�heaXa Ag -was held on the proposed'Tree Ordinances: Ord. amending Ord. 2238 by establishing -regulations for plant- ing of -trees; -Ord. amending Ord-`2owerstforhe FBdeS ofyAd;ustmen_t. and Ord. establishing additional ap eared and questioned T;nds�'`F;shez, 941 S. Van Buren, PP severalaspectsof the tree planting ordinance. For�stry Su lltEias3ent]J.ie—dauber_ and• ,� an R�ck'Geshwiler were-in_attendance to answer questions. SeveralCoe Haubembers g laps. Billie Rauber objected to City staff providing site p advised she was not'comfortable with to plans. cdroleieties eMcCrane, measurements, or City provi.si.on of o rage tion of, the 1223 Seymour Ave., appeared and"encouraged adoption lap. Richard Blum also appeared. Councilman tree planting p personal proposal. Public hearing closed./— 7 Selzer presented his p it was moved by.deProsse, seconded by Vevera" that the rule requiring that ordinances must be eYiorato thenmeeting at on for passage at two Council me bensusprior -that the-€ which it is to be finally _p mac} i - second consideration and vote 'at at ted his Affirma nance be voted upon.£or final passage all. Councilmembers_.present. time roll call vote was unanimous, Vevera,_that ORDI- It was then moved by deProsse, seconded by MANCE #76-2811, as recorded in Ord. Book 10,.pagesUSE 43-44,; AlHED!DRTAING THE OPROPERTYINANCE FROM RIA3TOBRIBHZONEN(20.3 acre tractToONS OF CE 1 _ REGUTAR COUNCT], MEETING OF OCMBER 5, -1976 7:30 P.M. PRESENT - ABSENT: BALMER ✓ dePROSSE FOSTER ?. NEUHAUSER PERRET 7:35' SELZER VEVERA a '`MINUTES OF'OFFICIAL'ACTIONS OF'COUNCIL ofiCigaE,ette"Permit io`Centtal?Vendoi OCTOBER 5;-1976 Res: 1176-363, page 4/?_; approving C. li The cost of publishing the following pro - retie Permit. ceedings &claims is $ Cumula- tive cost to date during this calendar RES. 1/76-364, page 47S„ACCEPTING SAi year for saidlpublication is $ TARY SEWFR IMPROVEMENTS-IN:,WEDGC•WDOD as;done"by Southgate Dev;Co ,-;;Inc,, Iowa City City Council, regular session, 10/5/76, 7:30;P,11„ at the Civic Center. Correspondence: .S Wim fred Iiorgan, Present: Balmer, deProsse, Foster, Neu- traffic control at Gilbert &"'Jeffersc referred Dept. of Public hauser, Selzer, Vevera, Perret (7:35 P.M) Absent: none. ;Mayor Neuhauser presiding. .to Works; Cc Robert Holzhammer„ re violation - parking,;q>nd James: B, Brad y, Jr.'re v Thomas Anthony appeared and presented'a lation of-,'traffic,laws on- Grove ,St;, ferred to Police proposal for embargo of large truck`traf- fic•on'Kirkwood Ave. and requested-Coun- Dcpt:.; Adrian Hogben tornado turning ai ens;.'Adrerred=gben cil'action betaken on alleviatingthe - Mgr,; t:wo petitions, re future of Hap problems caused by these`trucks. City Mgr. Berlin stated that 464,64, Code Hollow Park, referred to Comm., -'Jodson, Patti Monserud,"re"miniDev, of Iowa, authorizes -Council to designate referred:to Parks '& Rec. D- t. ;. truck routes and explained a new traffic code procedure would be. presented in the Affirmative roll' call was unanimous, near future. ; MayorNeuhauser stated this Councilmembersspresent'. ; matter would be discussed at the end of the month. Moved by Balmer, seconded by I'eriet, approve the Mayor's a y ppointment..of Ro After City Clerk Stolfus requested 'Res. Bohlken, 1906 Broadw�a.y ip t:6-fi11 the v Approving Cigarette Permit -be added to the cancy with 'i he term expiring 7/5/78 0 Consent Calendar, it tots mooed by Foster, Comm; on Conununity{Needs ,;Motion car 7/0' seconded by Perret,'that the following agenda items and recommendations in the Consent Calendar be approved and/or adopt- Moved by del'rosse ,. seconded by Perret 'ed as amended: - fund the,Johnsan Co. Arts-lwitl $50'"per mo. after its present grant ri Minutes of official actions of reg. Coun- cil mtg, of 9/21/76, subject out and until June;'77. Motion`carri 4/3 Balmer, Selzer, (and Vevera=voti_ to:correc- tion, as recommended by the City Clerk. '`no". Statement from Harold Ambrose concerning Councilwoman dePrgss'e �ummar•Ezed-=the=' Steering Comm. change of trade name from Dirty Harry's to Moody ;Blue and addition of trade -.Transportation she:atill in Washington, D.C., on (lct. •I fc)r, alit name; The Fox Hole, to its. corp. - Nat'l League of; Ci ties,;, council reported"on the Housing &?ComdBUnlY.,y DE Minutes of Bds, and Comms.: Comprehensive conferenceAie attended in:Dubugd2 from 9/29 - 70/1: Plan Coord, Comm. - 9/9/76; Housing Comm,- -9/8/76; Riverfront Comm, --9/9/76; Bd. of Adjustment - 8/4/76; Parks.& Rec. Comm. - The Seifert: request fot pet mission 1 9/22/76;,U,A:Y. Bd. - 9/23/75:: a covered opening .in t:he' idewalk was; cussed by ,Council. - Cit''Att�.. Hayek;i Permit Res., Book 36, recommended by•City Clerk Res. 1x76-356, formed Council the; procedure for:acqui tion the alley might take from`:3,tc page 465, approving Class B Beer Permit and Res, #76-357, page mos, and.itivolved identification'of 6%1 466, approving'Class 6`Beer Sunday Sales ship, appraisals, negotiations,and a< for tlaid-Rite'Corner, 630•Iowa'Ave.; Res. #76-358, 467,':approving sible condemnation-:proceeding-tlfter= therj iscussion, Mayor Neuhauser asked page Class B Beer Permit, and.:Res. #76 -359, 468,a rov- PP Hayek to report to,Councit.;in onemont -.page ing ClassIB Beer Sunday Sales for That to`how cum Ticated 'this mztter would=b P Deli, `620 S. Dubuque; Res: X76-360,`'page Councilman -Selzer- the Eng>''ll also'�nvestigate this "All 469, approving Class C'Beer Permit for mat.zr .-There no Council o��ect�ons Qui:, -Trip #503, 123 W. Benton; Res. #76- 361,.page 470,rapproving Class 'A"Liquor Lic^nse;for Grace & Rubies, 209-N. Linn; City"Atty Hayek stated t e Perpetual, ^,P,es r76-3o2,;_pee 4Z1zaporoGina-refund and I/1 State`Bank =,, ear,, negotia ions are,pro a ,mar_ ___ _,- �uiea v�th;Old Capitol Assoc, on', 8.. Selzer expressed his concern to a:beltline seconded oy:Selzer,;;that the rule qui ring that"ords must-be,'con -de P around the City forarucko traffic, I( and voted .on"for passage at•_:ttvo ` mtgs.:prior,to ,City Mgr, stated if Coun-_ cil would wish to'implement the mtg at:►vhich': to be:finall this pro- gram, its `cost could be incorporated into the_C.I>P, . Passed.;be suspenoed and best and-.second°cons' deratio which will be updated in; he next four=months.. Vote. vote be waived, and that,tfie.ord voted upon After discus- Sion, it was decided to request for final`` - time, Passaat aI Affirmative that Public Works determine what r -o -w Mould` be; needed roll call . -vote: unanimous, all, Councilmemh'6 for the beltline and find out what Plans the developer has pre: Moved by Foster, seconded by ;Selz( that.ORD.-176-2810, for , Scott Blvd. before the;C.I.P, is discussed. as recorded it Book 10, Pages it Councilman Faster -requested that NED.AREA DEVELOPMENT FOR A &IVAP1 finally adopted at.this press releases d• ;the ti".- 1 time;: Affi ivorce ticketing.;from ro 1.ca17 vote was unanimous,_ all'. to5iing,- noting _that the City is not in Counc•ilmembers present. the towing business -= a private indi- vidual is doing the towin M - oved by Selzer s 9. econded by B adopt RES. 76-365> Res.' Book3 Councilman Balmer questioned as to when 47475, ACCEPTING PREL '&"FINAL the"Riverfront Comm.'s request for in h PY H APTS. Affirmative roll;>:4 formation,.on'the acquisition of land was unanimous, all Counci_lmenibE would be discussed: Mr. Berlin 'stated this matter -could be determined after Public hearing was held to 'iezc the 'funds are identified upon the>Cit•ps-- Hi11, Scott Blvd Add.: buying out the�Fed.-Govt. in urban Re- RIB-and_R3A to',R1B.. C tS from ne:•�al. mar ized his report re;`Sevierng;'/ Councilmembers Balmer and deProsse in- Lucas and Larry SchnitLjer & R� dicated they would be absent from the Plum, PMo a Comm. appeared for sion. Moved by Foster; seconde informal mtg of the 18th and Balmer from_ ret, to -include the.memo'from?C the formal_ meeting of the,19th. Dietz as a part of i.he puhlic=h tion carried, 7/0 Public hrg, iioved by Selzer, seconded by deProsse, to return the amount of $4,670 to Con- Public hearing_was held-to..rezur -stance Merker re house located on 122 E. age Square from R3A-i:o_PC Wzor il Court St. ,Foster moved, and deProsse appearedand explained ;;the pei_it seconded to ;table the `motion in order to had submitted"earlier end p�^esen determine whether or not she should re- Petition; Of Objectors. Richard B ceive this amount of refund." Motion P,`& Z-Comm^'explained their_reas carried, 7/0, Gustav Fleers> Donald; Sutherland City Atty. Hayek presented an ordinance Miller, and Don,Patdubsky also a and presented 06- lions=of obj, amending the Parking Ord- by providin Others appearing''included Nanc,.+I 9 Jack Doyle, Lance I eves; and ;',�r; recourse against motor vehicles>parkin9 Bonney. 'Scott Bal^I:er;ratty „=,r on private property.- He explained -its t:•�o sections, impediment of-private•ac_ Square,., eared. Moved by ►? -rE cess to public way and parking upon;pri- onded by>dePr°sse, i:a acce t _vate property. council'later came to Or eti includding a etterspfre the consensus to con -d Lindh°ld Dal. RI to` Dietz -sum. �tty. Ed chard.-, . . discus d by Per - it y Eng. g :- Mo - 10/12/76. s� or the ordnance > c and Hertha Levis, and 0._J. and Miriam;Gingeri_ch,;and_make t y y. Hayek suggested Council sched- a part Public public hrg bio tion carr Cit Att 7/0, Public hearing closed, ule discussion on pending litigation within the next month or so.Mayor Neuhauser declared a brief recess : Public hearing was held on the Planned Public hearing was held;on-the.propose� Area Dev, of A;R H Avt Tree, • 0 d s.;-Atty;Alan Leff r .-amending Ord. appeared Councilman Balmer requestedestablishing reg, for planting o in:ormatio-'from tht_ City.Mgre s tohow Ord :.amending Ord;;,2584;-vj'.:Fcc m�nY.aPts ini--Iowa -ity provide-hendi Ord , and .Ord establishing add' capped-accessihiii+,.=->r... :�- -:,for of+a.l,+m. . _ .._ .. ... and Sem 6r.-"Planner.-Illick Gesh wiler -tere -' attenda ncie to aris . MA RYC wer questions:EUHAUSER Carole McCrane appeared and encouraged ABBIE STOLFUS _MAYOR - adoptionofthe tree planting plan. CITY CLERK Richard Blum also appeared.Councilman Selzer presented his October 19 1976 personal proposal. Public hearing.,closed. Moved by deProsse, seconded by Vevera, that the .rule requiring that ords.,must be considered and voted on for -passage MAYOR at two Council mtgs. prior to the mtg. at whichAt is to be finally passed be suspended,,that the first and second consideration and vote be-waived and that the Ord, be L11 I y �LLRK voted upon�forf i nal , passage at ,this,. time.: Affirmative-roll callvotewas unanimous, all Council- members present. Moved by deProsse, seconded byVevera, that ORD. #76-2811, 2 as recorded in Ord. Book 10pages 43-44 AMENDING-ZONING ORD: 2238 BY.CHANGING THE..USE REGULATIONS, OF CERTAIN PROPERTY FRO-M RlA to RIB ZONE (20.3 acres Bryn Mawr Heights Add.) be finall- y adopted at this time.. Affirmative roll call vote was unanimous, all Councilmembers present. I-loved by deProsse, seconded by Vevera, that-ORD. AMENDING ZONING ORD 2238'BY CHANGING THE USE.-REGULATIONS OF CERTAIN PROPERTY- FROM RIA ZONE TO R2, R3, & RIB ZONES (several contiguous parcels, so. of-Bryn Mawr Heights 7) be considered and given second vote for passage. Roll call:' Ayes: -V' evera2 Balmer, Foster-, 7 �'l Neuhauser, Perret, Selzer. Nays: de- *Prosse. -Second consideration given Moved by deProsse, seconded by Foster, toadopt RES. #76 ' -366 as recorded in Res. Book.,36;ipge 476, AUTHORIZING CON- TRACT FOR REAL ESTATE APPRAISAL SERV. BETWEEN THE CITY AND 1014A APPRAISAL AND RESEARCH-CORP. Affirmative roll call vote was unanimous, all Councilmembers present. Moved by Foster, seconded by Selzer, to adopt RES. J6-367, as recorded in Res. Book 36, page 477, AUTHORIZINGCONTRACTFOR REAL ESTATEAPPRAISAL SERV. BETWEEN THE CITY-AND:,ROY:R. FISHER, INC,` Af firmative roll call vote was -unanimous, all Councilmembers present. Moved by deProsse, seconded by Perret, to adjourn the meeting at 11:00 P.M. Motion carried.-' .-A more complete description of Council act des vi -_J s on.-f i I e. i n-th - ffice -0 of .,.-�City4 CIerK-.:-�­--_: the' Z 4 if le z Al' J. 2- G COUNCIL MEETING OF A • �c / GL �/ �� NUMBER - Index Agenda Regular Council Meeting October 5 1976 7:30 P.M. Page 2 3d. Permit Resolutions,; as -recommended by the City Clerk. (1) Consider -resolution approving Class B Beer Permit application _r-3s�_ for Kathryn J. Kelly dba/Ataid-Rite Corner, 630 Iowa Avenue. (2) Consider resolution approving Class B Beer Permit Sunday Sales application for Kathryn J. Kelly dba/Maid-Rite Corner, 630 Iowa Avenue. (3) Consider resolutionapproving Class B Beer Permit application 3.51for. John Oler dba/That Deli, 620 S. Dubuque. (4) Consider resolution approving Class;B Beer,Permit_Sunday Sales 3 5 5 application for John Oler dba/That Deli, 620 S. Dubuque. - (Although Council did approve the Class B Beer and Sunday. Sales permits for That Deli, the State would not accept the renewal application and requested --a new application be completed instead because of the Change from partnership to single owner.) (S) Consider resolution approving Class C Beer Permit, application - for Ronald R. Males dba/Quik Trip, `u503,-123 W.,Benton. 61 (6) Consider resolution approving Class -A Liquor License application for Women's Restaurant Project, Inc., dba/Grace F Rubies, 209 N. Linn (the by-laws have been presented). _ — (7) Consider resolution approving refund of Cigarette Permit to Central Vendors for selling cigarettes at.American Legion Post , p OO` #17. CD Ills `` Of ' A Y e&oll2JJ I I WV 0.VVfUt)Ih� CI�nRCTTE pE2Mi1. M e. Resolutions. CONSIDER RESOLOTION ACCEPTING SANITARY SEWER 7MPROVaUiTS IN WEDGEWOOD APARTh1ENTS ADDITION TO THE CITY OF IOWA CITY. Comment:' This resolution accepts the work done by Southgate Development Co., Inc., on Broadway Street insWedge wood Apartments Addition. This sewer has been constructed in accordance with the City's specifications;and the - staff recommends approval of the resolution. f. Correspondence'. (1) Letter 'from 'S. Winifred Morgan regarding -traffic control at the intersection of Gilbert and Jefferson. This letter has - been referred to the Department of Public Works for reply. (2) Letter from Father _Robert E Holzhammer regarding -violation of private parking. This letter.has been `referred to the - Police Department for reply: - It 1 � 4.1 a. I c.It.:;Cy 3Scc1 /(r12trr t �G•rr i.3.0 v la +I.- c .�, , r;...�-J��./YL/'�- , t ✓LLQ _. �11...L�.- `�L f��J _ It ji. :_175 rF . <-- r- L71 .¢- r -- ------- _ ;z 14 j^_ �' ! rz 7•. \,._ `- __ r L'..- t r_ -f � � � :_�l4-I �_7 t'i. � �_a.-yam .� _ _ — - Cr c 1 s _ _ �.. i _. l '�.. ..�^... _..•-�� 1t n .....y .?/ i!ti OL��•L G'-tet_"^'„ D _ .. __._.___ __ -- vI 1..:.:-' ~�. f,t .�`Cf t ..Z'�� �C.-'(-1--✓-t... i.. 4s-LR�e s _Lf . _. _.-. ./..1-�.. 7c.i/-r .:.. .1 (}.,._Y-f'-..r, :: _.:L�' t:�:-.-C..�•J__:_.vr. y.�.c ,�+'^=r��',-�.•_- _ -- ...'. _.__.- t t� • , V V j tt r /! r. „�;� � - �.._ � �._. t'� ft v4 !r --�T r';r� � C �' V't v+ •M{�• _ _. _ -- •j f, 1/ T .=_ � •�-•,.. r �- ;` :- rz.... L -t rs. _"L'. ..__. ..,....-J^i .1.2.,7' +,_ f,. _. _.. ._ .___— Irl -c ZZ .. �% - 4- ._.ter p �/moi ! 1 I,.l � �.J'...I I'LT.� C!L)-L w.-, l n C'- <. r tom.. 'f /.r� J 766, 067 _ _ N -t ,.�v i �c.�__r Z,_ L.• � "_ `� _ L��. � n � •_ G�_���v,--,_-� , tom.-�-t�t,_..�'_'... _ /)":'� .1^ - .� .fit^ ..1--L . LL L_�•.4.. �Wc.�l_ :tlir -:. -ate, (_i-tiy: � n I r } _ _, 'i �. j,� .- _ ,. ,, � i .-_— - - alt. r" �.- ..il� - _ . � _ �'� 1� - -1, � � �� T, __ �.,. ;.rte -- _ � ._ �. _ .., . .. _.. _. _ _ ___ .._ r: ... ___ _._-. ._...__.. -,�z , _ . ,_� _ r,_, - , �� -. - --- . .. - .._ - _ .._. _ _ -_ _ .._ . 1 1 �.__:.. __._. _._ - __ _ - �. , _. t� - _ _ - ,, ,- . - � � :, _ - - - -__._. _ _ _ _ —_ ,:. r �: - ..: _.__ -' � _. . ;: ` � ' . .. � .. . .. . _. n s __ �.� T-. I'-_ [ i. G... � 1?l.t-61......1-. � rte. .. -- -- :: - - i t_.. r ' .. �. :_ ..' ..r _ _ 1 .1 ..� ___ r__ _ F i l -F c - - -- - - — i � V: .._ e .. -.._ ..a ., - ,. , ., ,- .. — ,: -`- ----• --- � a _, - �', � _ ._ r., ... ) i .��.�:. -- _. t � l,' -n. - � .. ..._ X11 -`.} _.. _.. .. t_f. �. _ % f ,- L;, r.. - _- - j t,� -,-�1 ' . ._ L- ,�, ,. _ i •" _ -__ ;c — ,: -`- ----• --- � a _, - _ ... ) -- .. J .- � _ -n. - � .. ..._ r f� i i - j Agenda Regular Council Meeting October 5, 1976 7:30 P.M. Page 5 Item No. 8 - (continued) Council. Said plan has been revised to.incorporate the Tree Ordinance. provisions. The LSRD-plan will be submitted to the Council for consid- cration'subsequent to consideration of the Ordinance approving the.PAD plan. A staff report dated September 2;- 1976,;regarding this item is attached to this agenda. - J ,Action: 7� ' 8� h /> Item No. 9 - PUBLIC HEARING TO REZONE THREE PARCELS OF A TRACT OF LAND FROM RIA TO RIB AND R3A AND FRW 113A TO RIB. Z-.7613. Comment: The Planning and Zoning Commission at a regular meeting held on September 2, 1976, recommended by a 5-0.vote with two abstentions approval of an application submitted by Plum Grove Acres, Inc., to rezone the above parcels located west_ of Scott Boulevard and north of the easterly extension of Washington Street.. At the:request;of the Commission, approval of the application would result in the change in location of an existing 113A Zone. 'A staff report dated August 30 con- cerning this item is attached. Flo r" -Action: a kc�d Di Item No. 10 - PUBLIC HEARING TO REZONE A'TRACf OF LAND FROM R3A TO PC (Z-7611), LOCATED ON WFST BENTON STREET (HERITAGE SQUARE). Comment: The Planning and Zoning Commission at a regular meeting held on September 2, 1976, recommended by a 4-3 vote approval of an application submitted by Heritage Systems to rezone a tract of: land located south of Benton Street across from Seville Apartments from an R3A 'Zone to'a PC (Planned Commercial) Zone.' The applicant is desirous of developing a small neighborhoodconveniencecenter on a 1.25;acre tract at the above location. In conjunction with:the rezoning application, a Large Scale Non-Residential Development plan-'was submitted and simultaneously recommended for approval by the Commission which will be presented .to the City Council subsequent to consideration of anordinance rezoning thepropertyto a PC Zone. A staff report dated August 19 regarding this matter is attached. a. Letter from Dale D. Levis and Hertha'Levis objecting to;rezoning of tract of land on West Benton Street. r _ a _ r / r s , _ r ; n >� �, it 1 }�]_ �:,i �}-;...r { 1 Mt t._.�'..-f.r- f l' �rZ G��1-t� i"l•�`; � =t _� 1 _ �}.. _ _ _ i _ l ' I I r• �- - i iJ Agenda Regular Council Meeting October 5, 1976 7:30 P.M. Page G - Item No. 10 - continued b. Letter from Vera Ruth Lindhold objecting to reioning_of tract of: land on West Benton Street. Y C. Statement from William G. Buss in opposition to rezoning of tract of land (Heritage Square) from ! _ R3A to PC. _. Action: Item No. 11 -PUBLIC FIEARING ON AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE No. 2238, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF IOWA CITY, IOIVA, BY ESTABLISHING REGULATIO,YS FOR THE PLANTING OF TREES WITHIN IOWA CITY, IOWA, BY ESTABLISHING SECTION 8.10:40. Comment: The Planning and Zoning Commission on September 2,'1976, a 7-0 vote recommended by adoption of the above Ordinance. The ubject Ordinance is a -- revision of the Ordinance presented to the Planning and Zoning_Commission- on August 19, 1976, which was recommended for denial by a,3-1 vote. _ Action: G ,`;r,�: r/ ; Item No. 12 .- PUBLIC HEARING ON AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 2584; THE FORESTRY ORDINANCE OF IOWA CITY, IOWA, BY REPEALING -SECTIONS 3.38:A AND 3.38.11.A(3) OF THE 8. FORESTRY ORDINANCE AND ESTABLISHING NEW SECTIONS IN LIEU THEREOF. Comment:_ The Planning and Zoning Commission at a regular meeting held September 2,'1976, on recommended by a-7-0rvote approval of a`,proposed `Ordinance repealing sections of the Forestry, Ordinance -which are in conflict with the proposed Tree Ordinance. This Ordinance was'recom- mended for denial by 3-1 - a vote at a previous meeting of the Commission held on August 19, 1976, but:because of the revisions to the Tree Ordi- nance itself, it is now being recommended for approval. Action: Item No. 13 - PUBLIC HEARING ON AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING ADDITIONAL POWERS BOARD OF ADJUSENT. FOR THE TM Comment: The Planning and Zoning Commission on August 19, 1976, a 4-0 vote recommended.by approval of a proposed Ordinance establishing additional. powers for the Board -of- Adjustment 'so that they may adjudicate appeals relating to the proposed Tree=Ordinance. _- Action: - Agenda Regular,Council Meeting October'-5, 1976 7:30 P.M.'` Page 7 Item No. 14 - CONSIDER ORDINANCE 'AMENDING 'ZONING ORDINANCE 2238 BY CHANGING T1[, USE REGULATIONS OF CERTAIN PROPERTY;FROM RIA TO RIB ZONE(20.3ACRE TRACT.OF LAND IN-BRYN MAWR HEIGHTS ADDITION (second consideration).' Comment: A public hearing onthisitem was held September 21, 1976. The Planning and Zoning Commission _ .regular at ameeting held -on August.5, 1976; recommended by a 6-0 vote approval of the subject application.: t :The 20.3 acre tract includes the southern extensions of Sunset Street;' Denbigh and Penkridge Drives. The applicant, Bryn Mawr Heights, Inc., i has also submitted ary a 69 lot preliminplat of this tract with average l lot sizes in;excess:of 10,000'square feet. Since-the, minimum lot size requirement in the RIA Zone.is'10,000square feet, :the 'applicant:has requested a change in zoning to RIB 'for :the purpose of developing homes on corner lots in excess of 0,000 square feet and on inte-rior.lots slightly less than 10,000 square feet. The preliminary plat will,-be presented to the City Council subsequent to the Council's consideration of the rezoning application. An analysis of the subject rezoning: request is included in a staff report dated July is 1976i and was furnished agenda with the of September 21. - Action:1 / Y Y = Item No. 15 - a CONSIDER ORDINANCE AMENDING ZONING ORDINANCE 2238 BY CHANGING THE USE -- REGULATIONS OF CERTAIN PROPERTY FRCM RIA ZONE TO R2 R3$:;R1B:ZONES (SEVERAL CONTIGUOUS PARCELS OF LAND SOUTH OF BRYN MAWR HEIGHTS 7) (second consideration) Comment:- A public hearing on this item was held on September>21, 1976. The:. Planning and Zoning Commission ata regular--'meeting`, held on.August'19, 1976, recommended by 4-0 a vote approval of the rezoning,of several contiguous parcels, all in the Bryn, Mawr Heights area south of Bryn Mawr Heights, Part 7, and north of the south corporate limits of Iowa City. -Parcel-1--- from RlA to'RZ - i Parcel 2 -= from RIA to R3 Parcel 3 -- from RIB to R2 Parcel 4 -- from RIA to R2 Parcel 5 -- from RIA to RIB Bryn Mawr Heights and Company had originally submitted c an application (Z-7609) to on licatis- rezone the above parcels to zones which met with tance`from adjoining residents. Thzones and the residents; later met to agree to the above zoning scheme.,. A staff-analysis of the original application was presented in a Staff. Report dated August 5, 1976, and was furnished with the Septemher: 21-agenda. . Action: ' v Agenda Regular Council Meeting October 5, 1976. 7:30 P.M. Page 8 Item No. 16 = CONSIDER RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING A CONTRACT FOR REAL ESTATE APPRAISAL SERVICES BETWEEN THE CITY OF IOWA CITY AND IOWA APPRAISAL AND RESEARCH / C CORPORATION. Comment: The Department of Housing and Urban Development requires the'fair reuse value of redevelopment, sites to be updated with new: appraisal evidence whenever the appraisals on which the value is based are more than eighteen t - months old at time of execution of a contract for sale (two appraisals are required). The appraisals which are on record are now outdated The City has solicited proposals for appraisal services, evaluated such proposals received, and selected this firm as one of two to provide appraisal services. Action: /fir Item No. 17 - CONSIDER RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING A CONTRACT.FOR REAL ESTATE APPRAISAL SERVICES BETWEEN T1]E- CITY OF I01VA CITY AND ROY R. FISHER, INC. Comment: See comment above. This firm has been selected to provide one of the two appraisals required by the Department .of Housing and Urban Develop- _ ment for redevelopment sites at the time ofexecution of a. contract for.sale when the appraisals on which..the property values are based are more than eighteen months old. . Action: G i" l . "-Lc7 / z-� G �1 � v Item No. 18 - ADJOURN%TNT. ,. COMPLETE DESCRIPTION OF COUNCIL ACTIVITIES SEPTEMBER 21, 1976 7:30 P.M. The Iowa City City Council met in regular session on the 21st day of September, 1976, at 7:30 P.M. in the Council Cham- bers at the Civic Center. Councilmembers present were: Bal- mer, deProsse, Foster, Neuhauser, Perret, Selzer, Vevera. Absent: none. Mayor Neuhauser presiding. S. R. Huntley appeared and asked Council, in their delib- erations on urban renewal, to retain the Blackhawk (Washington St.) mini -park. Mayor Neuhauser explained that it was the recommendation of the consultant to market the land. Jeff Busch appeared and challenged Mayor Neuhauser to a debate on October 6, 1976, at 7:30 P.M, concerning housing and urban renewal. She accepted the challenge. It was moved by Foster, seconded by Perret, that the following agenda items and recommendat amended: in the Consent Cal- endar be approved and/or adopted as mended: Reading of minutes of official actions of regular Council meeting of September 7, 1976, subject to correction, as recommended by the City Clerk. Minutes of Boards and Commissions: Comprehensive Plan Coord. Comm, meeting of 8-26-76; Iowa City Airport Comm. meeting of 7-15-76 and 8-19-76; Iowa City Library Bd. of Trustees special meeting of 8-7-76; Iowa City Housing Comm. meeting of 7-21-76. Permit Resolutions, as recommended by the City Clerk as recorded in Res. Book #36: Resolution #76-335, page 428, approving Class B Beer Per- mit application for John Mark Oler dba/That Deli, 620 S. Dubuque; Resolution #76-336, page 429, approving Class B Beer Sunday Sales Permit application for John Mark Oler dba/That Deli, 620 S. Dubuque; Resolution #76-337, page 430, approving Cigarette Permits. Motions: Consider motion to approve disbursements for the period June 1 - 30, 1976, in the amount of $1,571,140.70, subject to audit, as recommended by the Acting Finance Director. Correspondence: Letter from P. M. Kvidera regarding housing situation in Iowa City for students. This letter has been referred to the City Manager's office for reply. Letter from the Iowa City Riverfront Commission regarding funds available for Iowa River Corridor Management. This letter has been referred to the City Manager's office for reply. Motion was adopted by following roll call vote: Ayes: Balmer t deProsse, Foster, Neuhauser, Perret, Selzer, Vevera. Motion adopted, 7/0. 0 LJ Page 2 Council Activities September 21, 1976 Mayor-Neuhauser an was.one v four-year term on=the Board of Electrical ppeals for acancy;;Eor a. a Journeyman Electrician,wcal the date of"October 26 expiration oin 196, Council 'Will be makin P tment on October 26, 1976." githis ap- There.was a the League of ort made by Mayor.Neuhauser.concerninq on September 20. Municipalities meetingr".held ;in -Cedar Ce al bonding, Topics, she noteng-eel uin Fids,,' Act and the transit subsidenue y bill, bill the CommunitymDevelopment Prowse, Linda Schreiber David Perret;;.Carolide meeting. _ and Neal Berlinialso attended _ the:• Councildiscussed complaints Perret concerning strict complaints cls, received b De t, y enforcementybCouncilman cated�t. mechanical operations: of the traffic the;Police,.. at. Madison and lights;.lo Property. o :erthority of Police concernin Burlington; and solvingythesetY Attorney Hayek'statedrtherekare, a private and, su Problems (i.e;, amending the:;Parkinptions ante) ggested this matter be discussed 4 Ordinance) It at can: informal session. RESOLUTIONS#76-338moved bY deProsse • as recorded sinoResa Booka36er, to -adopt.' AUTHORIZING ABANDONED BIe 431, CYCLE SALE b nt to dispose of=accumulated y- the;Police::Degartme calVe Ayes— deProsse,-FOster°les .on October 30,:.1976.re . Balmer. Resolution adoptedhauseer Roll / .:Perret, Selzer, City Manager. Berlin informed: continue to pursue the Council: that Buildin investigation of a staff would . g Official position". applicants for the 'A public hearing was held on the Commi'ssion's recommendation to rezone-Plannin parcels of land several contiguous south-of"Bryn Mawr:Heights,7. guous:r, A Public hearing was then held on an application sub mined by Bryn:Mawr Heights, Inc,,to rezone alB.,20.3 acre tract'of'land from RlA to Council of objectorsttoRrezonTwo-Two ling,'of Hawke a g".this,:land, presenteg Y Engineering,' and Ernie: Lehman Dennis,Saeu - missioner, appeared -and st"ated that. -,the '.a.P6Z:Com raised by the objectors yl:,thought •the issues;:.: proposal. It had been taken `care; of. by, the second; file was moved by Foster, seconded by Perret, to theepublicahearinthe;two petitions and;'make;them a„part of made to have Mr, 4• . "Motion carried, 7/0;x, :A;;decision;,was Hayek meet with Scott Barker, Attorney, Page 4- Council Activities September 21, 1976 MUNICIPAL:CODE -0F THE ,CITY :OF:IOWA:CITY,.'IOWA)..WITH;RESPECT - TO THE -ISSUANCE OF AND RENEWAL OF.A CLASS AiPRIVATE CLUB LIQUOR LICENSE=be considered and given -second vote-;for,passage. Roll call: Ayes: Perret, Selzer, Vevera, deProsse, Foster, Neuhauser. Nays: Balmer.- Second consideration-,given,_6/1. After it was moved by deProsse, and seconded:.by Perret;,.:, that:the ordinance be considered) -and given first;.vote; for, ;<..,; passage,Foster moved and Selzer seconded, to substitute the;_ motion that the rule requiring that ordinances:must be.con- sidered and voted on for passage at two Council meetings prior to the meeting at which it`is_to be finally passed:be sus- pended, that the first.and second consideration and vote_ -be_ waived, and that 'the.ordinance be voted':upon,for:final-:passage at this time.; -.Roll call: Ayese Selzer,-'Vevera, Balmer,,,de- Prosse, Foster, Neuhauser,,Perret. ,Motion to_,substitute:_.;_(.-; carried, 7/0. Then it was moved by Foster, seconded by de- Prosse, that as stated in the substitute motion,,.:the;;ORDINANCE #76 -2808, -recorder. in Ord. Book -10, page �38-,,PROVIDING,FOR. A`CHANGE IN PROCEDURE -FOR ASSESSING FEES FOR SERVICES: PRO-,;,,: VIDED ' BY-THE-•WATER•DIVISION be finally adopted at:this)time. Roll call: Ayes: Vevera,•Balmeri:`deProsse,,Foster,r--Neuhauser, Perret, Selzer. Ordinance adopted, 7/0. It was moved by -Selzer, seconded.by7Vevera,,.to .adopt -..., RESOLUTION #76-341, as recorded in Res. Book 36, page 436, APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF EASTDALE MALL. City Attor- ney Hayek called attention to the memo from Asst. City Atty. Angela Ryan that the developer needs to comply with Section 9.52 -of the Municipal Code of the City of Iowa City concern- ing Large Scale Non -Residential Developments. Dennis Saeugling, Hawkeye Engineering, appeared. The roll call vote on the above Resolution was as follows: Ayes: Balmer, deProsse, Foster, Neuhauser, Perret, Selzer, Vevera. Resolution adopted, 7/0. City Attorney Hayek suggested an amendment to 9.52, possibly setting a threshold limit on existing buildings to trigger;''_ L.S.N.R.D.s. It was moved by Selzer, seconded by Vevera, to adopt RESOLUTION #76-342, as recorded in Res. Book 36, pages 437- 438, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE A PERMANENT SIDEWALK EASEMENT IN FAVOR OF THE IOWA CITY COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT FOR THE HELEN LEMME ELEMENTARY SCHOOL. Roll call: Ayes: deProsse, Foster, Neuhauser, Perret, Selzer, Vevera, Balmer. Resolution adopted, 7/0. This resolution will grant the school district the right to erect a fence and maintain the walkway that connects Helen Lemme School to Hastings Avenue. It was moved by Foster, seconded by Balmer, to adopt RESOLUTION #76-343, as recorded in Res. Book 36, pages 439-440, PROPOSING TO CONVEY AN ALLEY IN BLOCK 46, EAST IOWA CITY, Zai v s^ O 1 =Omanf n v p Z°Dc T 0 r 0 low a O Z n Page 2 Council Activities September 21, 1976 Mayor-Neuhauser announced there ,wa four-year term on the-s_one..vaaancy;for a Board of Electrical: Examiners;;:and;,; Appeals,for a Journeyman Electrician,with the expiration date -"of October -26; 1980. :;Council,.will be`making_this ap- pointment on October 26, 1976. There was a report made by Mayor,.Neuhauser�:concerning the League of Municipalities meeting held -in Cedar Rapids_ on September 20: Topics, she. noted;[included: .,municipal bonding, the revenue sharing:bill,,the Community Development, Act, and thetransitsubsidy bill.,, _.;David Perret,:,Carol;de se, Linda sSchreiber, and NealBerlin-also-attended the;, meeting.- Council discussed complaints:received;by Councilman Derret., concerning strict bicycle enforcementaby-,the:;Police Dept., the mechanical operations of the traffic, -lights to cated at the intersection.of..Madison'and Burlingtony;and the.authority of Police concerning:cars.parked_•on;private property: <<City'Attorney Hayek"stated.,.there;are,options to solving 'these problems (i.e:,'amending thelParkingsOrdinance) and suggested this matter be discussed at.:an-informal-session. It was moved by deProsse, seconded by Balmer ..,. t RESOLUTION #76-338, as recorded in Res. Book 36 ' topage;ado, AUTHORIZING ABANDONED BICYCLE SALE by:the Police, -.Department' to dispose of accumulated bicycles'.on,October 10,11976.; Roll call: Ayes: deProsse} Foster, Neuhauser,:. Perret,,Selzer;, Vevera, Balmer. Resolution adopted,.7/0.° City Manager -Berlin informed Council that:stas for the would, continue to pursue the investigation of applicant Building Official position. - A'public hearing was held -on the: Planning_and;,Zoning. Commission's -recommendation to::rezone several,;contiguous; parcels offland south of Bryn Mawr. -Heights, 7. , A public hearing was then held on an application sub` mitted by Bryn Mawr Heights,.Inc.,-:.to rezone;a-,20.3 acre tract of land from R1A to'R1B.;c•.Two.petitions".were presented to Council'of objectors to rezoning .this;land Dennis,-Saeug- ling, of Hawkeye .Engineering,' and Ernie; Lehman,.; ;a <P&Z Com + .` missioner,' appeared 'and stated :that;-.they_.;.thought, ;the; issues raised by the objectors had been taken;%care;; of -,:by, the second Proposal. It was moved by Foster, seconded by'Perret, £o receive and file "the'two petitions.-and.•make :them a ;part of the Public hearing; Motion carried,_,?/0.;:A.:decision.-was made to have Mr. Hayek meet with Scott Barker, Attorney, Page 3 Council Activities September 21, 1976- and Bryn Mawr Heights, Inc., developer, to discuss this matter. The Community Development Dept. staff will deter- mine whether or not .the petitions will:require.anrextra- ordinary majority Council vote on the.ordinance to -rezone.- -,A public hearing was held on the resolution:.modifying the Urban Renewal Plan for Project Iowa:.R-14. Mayor Neu- hauser pointed out Council's consensus at the informal meet- ing'to amend the proposed resolution-.to::take out:the.proposed deletionOfstreet closings as,recommended-:-by::the.consultant: and the staff. The --result of;this is..that the.street.clos-, ings will be as outlined in the 'original Urban ,Renewal,P,Ian, , plus the addition of --Capitol Street between.Burlingtonand Court. The City Manager pointed out that this -.should not, -be, construed as placing the Council or staff in a position,;of-:- any recommendation concerning the ultimate decision relat- ing to street closures. Carol�Flinn,_2664-Hillside-.:Drive, appeared representing the First Christian:±Church-relative. to housing downtown:- She suggested an amendmentr:to;:.Sec.-B.,:.; Part 2, (M), on Page 2 of the Resolution;to add."especiallyr_ low-income elderly, and handicapped persons in Iowa_City°,.;, after the word "opportunities.":: Bob Welshy_2526.Mayfield Road, called;attention to six items.in the;Plan,•,including provision for parking, plazas,:research-facilities,:under- ground utilities, right-of-way on Dubuque, and housing, which were discussed. A'public hearing was held on the sale.of.real.property.. in Block 101,to Perpetual Savings and Loan Association, for $161;720, and to the Johnson County Realty Company_.(Iowa;; State Bank) for $195,222. Bob Welsh appeared and.requested;.., elimination of the provision for the 25' x 120' portion of land and discussed%the design of Clinton -.St. It was moved by Balmer, seconded byadeProsse, to.adopt , RESOLUTION #76-339, as recorded in Res. Book 36, pages 432- 433, TO SELL;REAL PROPERTY BLOCK`.101 TO PERPETUAL SAVINGS AND LOANASSOCIATION. =Roll call: Ayes::.Foster, Neuhauser-,,% Perret, Selzer, Vevera, Balmer; deProsse.:..:Resolution adopted, 7/0. It was moved by Balmer, seconded by;deProsse, toiadop-t RESOLUTION #76 -340 --as recorded .in Res.. Book.3.6;.„pages,434-. 4351'TO SELL'REAL PROPERTY, BLOCK 101F.TO.:JOHNSON COUNTY REALTY COMPANY (Iowa State Bank)... Roll.'call: Ayes: ;Neu , hauser, Perret, Selzer,-Vevera, Balmer,:deProsse, Foster Resolution adopted, 7/0. It was moved by Foster, seconded by-deProsse, that the nPnTMANCF. AMENDING ORDINANCE NOS -2605.(5.24.9 -AND 5.1124.1 0, Page 4 MUNICIPAL CODE OF TO THE ISSUANCE:OF LIQUOR LICENSE -be Roll call: Ayes: Neuhauser.Nays: 0 Council Activities September 21, 1976 THE<CITY;OF::IOWA CITY,:IOWA) WITH;RESPECT., AND RENEWAL OF -A CLASS A,-PRIVATECLUH considered_andr.given,second votevfor.passage. Perret, Selzer, Vevera, deProsse, Foster, Balmer.. -.Second consideration -given, 6/1. After it was moved by deProsse,.and seconded by Perret . -that•the'ordinance be considered and given first:vote:for; passage, -Foster -moved and Selzer�seconded.to.-substitute,.the motion that the,:rule requiring that ordinances, must be con- sidered and voted on for passage at two Council meetings prior to the meeting at which it -'is to be.finally passed -,be sus- pended, that the first and second consideration3and:_•vote,be,,; waived, and that -the ordinance-be.:voted.upon-,.fOr,:final passage at this time. Roll call: Ayes: '.Selzer, Vevera, Balmer,_de- Prosse, Foster, Neuhauser, Perret: .;Motion to -.;substitute_-;__-• carried, 7/0. Then it was moved by Foster, seconded by de Prosse, that as -stated in the substitute. motionthe:ORDINANCE #76-2808; recorded in Ord. Book 10, -:page 38;•_,PROVIDING,;FOR,; A''CHANGE IN PROCEDURE :FOR ASSESSING FEES FOR,SERVICES,-PRO VIDED BY=:THE WATER•DIVISION-be finally.,adopted at -this Roll call: Ayes: Vevera, Balmer;:deProsse,-Foster,-:Neuhauser, Perret, Selzer. Ordinance adopted, 7/0. It wa"s moved"by Selzer, seconded.by:Vevera,r:to•adopt RESOLUTION #76-341, as recorded in Res. Book 36, page 436, APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF EASTDALE MALL. City Attor- ney Hayek called attention to the memo from Asst. City Atty. Angela Ryan that the developer needs to comply with Section 9..52_of the Muni-cipal Code of the City of Iowa City concern- ing Large Scale Non -Residential Developments. Dennis Saeugling, Hawkeye Engineering, appeared. The roll call vote on the above Resolution was as follows: Ayes: Balmer, deProsse, Foster, Neuhauser, Perret, Selzer, Vevera. Resolution adopted, 7/0. City Attorney Hayek suggested an amendment to 9.52, possibly Lsetting a threshold limit on existing kiuildngs £o arigger= .S.N.R.D.s. It was moved by Selzer, seconded by Vevera, to adopt RESOLUTION #76-342, as recorded in Res. Book 36, pages 437- 438, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE A PERMANENT SIDEWALK EASEMENT IN FAVOR OF THE IOWA CITY COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT FOR THE HELEN LEMME ELEMENTARY SCHOOL. Roll call: Ayes: deProsse, Foster, Neuhauser, Perret, Selzer, Vevera, Balmer. Resolution adopted, 7/0. This resolution will grant the school district the right to erect a fence and maintain the walkway that connects Helen Lemme School to Hastings Avenue. It was moved by Foster, seconded by Balmer, to adopt RESOLUTION #76-343, as recorded in Res. Book 36, pages 439-440, PROPOSING TO CONVEY AN ALLEY IN BLOCK 46, EAST IOWA CITY, Page 5 Council Activities September 21, 1976 to John and Ella Reiland and setting:a public hearing;on-,Octo- ber 12, 1976. Roll call: Ayes: Foster,.Neuhausery:;Perret,- Selzer,-Vevera, Balmer, deProsse.' Resolution -adopted; 7%0.;_ It was moved by Foster, seconded by.Selzer,<to,adopt:...:. RESOLUTION #76-344, as recorded in Res. Book 36, page 441, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR THE, PURCHASE OF A 1250 G.P.M.PUMPER TO AMERICAN LAFRANCE. Roll call: Ayes: Neuhauser, Perret,,Sel- zer, Vevera, Balmer, deProsse, Foster. Resolution adopted,; 7/0. 'City Manager Berlin explained the funding. It was moved by Balmer, seconded by�Foster, to.adopt RESOLUTION #76-345, as'recorded in Res. Book 36, pages., 442 446,`APPROVING>LARGE SCALE NON-RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT „KEN!S. Roll call: Ayes: Perret, Selzer,, Vevera,".Balmer,-:deProsse „ Foster;'Neuhauser. Resolution adopted,;7/0. Councilman-deProsse extended her appreciation to Community Development Director Kraft for his informational,lettei;to.Cedar Rapids Mayor Canney. .She stated.Mr. Canney,..relaye3 the,Iowa City comments and concerns on the H.C.D.A.=Act at-.the.U.S.,, Conference of Mayors in Albuquerque. It was moved by Balmer, seconded by Foster, to adjourn the meeting at -9:45 P.M. Motion carried, unanimouSly. CITY CLERK MAYOR • MINUTES COMPREI[ENS IVE PLAN COORDINATING COMMITI'Er: SEPTEMBER 9, 1976--- 7:30 P.M. <- CITY MANAGER'S CONFERENCE ROOM ' MEMBERS PRESENT: Blum, Jakobsen, Vetter, Ogesen, Ncuhauser, Cain, Ferret MEMBER ABSENT: deProsse STAFF PRESENT: Geshwiler, Milkman, Child GUESTS PRESENT: Bob Donnelly, Andrea Hauer, Monica Mohen -RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE CITY COUNCIL: Not to recommend the present citizen-participation proposal submitted a) Lawrence Halprin and Associates and to cite the following comments: a) The. Committee does recognize the need for outside bowing organize and carry out citizen participation; b) ihe'Committee feels that -'the citizen participati should be broad-based on process and maximum opportunity for citizen involvement; c) The Committee feels that the citizen participation process should be-less intensive in its use of any one group of people;: d) The Committee expressed that the process should be opinion- and idea-oriented, rather than oriented toward developing final in into the plan; C) The Committee wants the process to maximize the u media approach; and se of a multi- F) The Committee wants a process which parallels the--staff work effort the planningprocess and more closely by starting in phase with communicating ideas to the CPCC instead; of finalized input. REQUESTS FOR INFORMATION OR STAFF ASSISTANCE: To convey to Barbara Sink and Linda Schreiber thaServices t the Youth Se Survey Proposal was reviewed and it_,was determined that tuthSeC would not be the appropriate sponsoring agency.for such a proposal. The Human Relations Commission and/or Johnson County Regional Planning Commission were suggested as possible sponsoring agencies. SUMh1ARY OF DISCUSSION AND FORMAL ACTIONS TAKEN: Chairman Blum called ;the meeting to order and asked if there were any corrections or additions to the minutes of the meeting there.were any 26, rout s motion was made by Ogesen,'seconded by_Neuhauser,,to approve the minutes as written. The motion carried unanimously. Rick Geshwiler, Senior Planner, reported on the status of Planning, activities and explained that some studies would be deferred until work would be completed on the land use plan and zoning ordinance. He also indicated that a change in personnel had been recommended to the City Council which wotha; a chan for two Assistant Planner positions in lieuofthe following three (vide . I) (1) one Associate Planner, (2) one half-time'Assistant Pl, and (3) one S/8-time Technical' Assistant.anner _ i bis .. .. w _ 11-v. ,. _2_ Mr. Geshwiler informed the Committee that the Advance Planning Division would provide approximately $12,000-$13,000 worth of staff -time to'the urban renewal work effort. Regional Transportation Plan comments were discussed and some alternative routes were suggested. Bob Donnelly,Johnson"County -Regional Planning Commission, questioned how the, Comprehensive Plan Coordinating Committee viewed the Committee's relationship to other committees. He noted that the City of Iowa City is represented on the JCRPC Area Transportation Study.Technical Committee, JCRPC Area Trans- portation Policy Committee, and JCRPC Transit Advisory Committee._The JCRPC Citizen's Advisory Committee is also concerned with the transportation plan, he said. Mr. Donnelly explained that JCRPC is now at the. stage where system alternatives will be identified. Committee member Neuhauser questioned whether recommendations should be addressed prior to the citizen participation process. She,also suggested; that the Metropolitan Land Use Plan be reviewed. No consensus was'[reached regarding specific alternatives but the Committee wanted to be informed and in communication with other committees as they reviewed :the transportation plan. - Committee member Perret stated that it would seem preferable to build a transit system rather than a street system and cautioned against "auto dominance". Marianne Milkman, Assistant Planner, gave a recapitulation'of the .Vegetation Guide. Favorable comments in support of the Vegetation "Guide were received from Dennis Showalter, Director of Parks and Recreation; and Dick-:Plastino, Director of Public Works. Mr..Plastino suggested that two' minor corrections be made." Billie-Hauber, City Forester, did not commenton Vegetation` Guide. After discussion, Committee members requested thatrthe staff (1) develop techniques that could be used to implement the proposed Vegetation Guide, and (2)providethe _Committee were references used in,the writing of the proposal. The citizen participation process was discussed. -Andrea Hauer, representative of-theCommittee on Community Needs, -stated that`the Committee on Community Needs -would like to go on record as favoring the citizen participation proposal submitted by Harold Baxter, representative of Lawrencer,Halprin and Associates. Ms. Hauer indicated that CCN had determined that the citizen participation process should contain the following components: (1) some form of survey instrument; (2) neighborhood meetings, (3) extensive media coverage; and (4) maximum opportunity for expressing concerns and ideas.: After discussion, the following motion was made by;Ogesen and seconded by Jakobsen: The Comprehensive Plan Coordinating Committee does not recommend the present citizen participation proposal submitted by Lawrence'Halprin and Associates and cites the following: _ 4 i' 'I; MINUTES IOWA CITY RIVERFRONT COMMISSION •CITY MANAGER'S CONFERENCE ROOM SEPTEMBER 9, 1976 MEMBERS PRESENT: Bassett, Brandrup, Fahr, Horton, Lindberg, Thayer, Vetter STAFF PRESENT: Flowers, Geshwiler, Milkman, Showalter GUESTS: Jody Muslin (KXIC), David Perret SUMMARY OF DISCUSSION AND FORMAL ACTION TAKEN: The Iowa City Riverfront Commission met in Regular Session on September 9, 1976, with Chairperson Fahr presiding. * firandrup moved and Bassett seconded that the minutes of the June 17, 1976, meeting. be approved as written. Unanimous. Showalter reported on land costs for the Showers property. He indicated that he had been informed that an offer to buy the 55 acres between the Gordon Russell property for $50,000 had been turned down and that the owners would still prefer to sell to the City than to private interests. This tract had been appraised at $500 and $800 per acre. The owners also turned down an offer to buy 130 acres, part of which is the land on which the houses lie, for $130,000. • * Following further discussion, Thayer moved and Bassett seconded.that the Chairperson of the Riverfront Commission write a letter to the City Council asking what funds the Commission can expect for planning on the river corridor project and referring to the earlier understanding that the funds that were allocated for river corridor. land acquisition and then re -allocated to Urban Renewal were to be_replaced.:at a:, later time. Unanimous. It was also pointed out that the information would be helpful for budgeting. The Iowa River Brochure was discussed with Fahr commending the Staff for their work on the project. The brochure will be completed in the near future and will be mailed to various organizations and hand delivered to various businesses. Brandrup thanked Horton for his work on the historical aspects of the brochure. Commission requested that copies of the brochure be mailed with the minutes. . Fahr reported on the River Corridor District Management Ordinance, indicating that the Riverfront Commission was cooperating with the City Attorney's office in researching the project. He also added that two law students were working •on. he project and that they would be doing research on flood plain zoning and Development Rights Transfer Statutes. The Riverfront Commission's recommendation that the City Council put a moratorium on building in the flood plain of the Iowa River was discussed, with Chairperson Fahr referring to a letter written by the City Attorney dated October 17, 1975. He pointed out that it did not seem that the City Council could impose a moratorium • until there is an amendment to the zoning ordinance. Milkman reported that the Iowa River had been surveyed by the U.S. Geological Survey and that that map would be accepted by HUD to be the flood plain map. She 1687 r 'f l MINUTES IOWA CITY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT �= AUGUST 4, 1976 -- 3:30 P.M. CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS MEMBERS PRESENT: Dickens, Fowles, McBride MEMBERS ABSENT: Goedken, Malcolm STAFF PRESENT: Schmeiser, Child DISCUSSION AND FORMAL ACTIONS TAKEN: Acting as Chairman, McBride called the meeting to order and asked if there were any corrections or additions to the minutes of the meeting held on June 2, 1976. A motion was made by Dickens, seconded by Fowles, to approve the minutes as written. The motion carried unanimously. V-7607. Application submitted by Mr. Dave Cahill and Mr. Pat Harding to permit lots at 1705 First Avenue to front upon a private drive or an "officially approved place" in lieu of upon a public street; date filed: 7/14/76. Mr. Dave Cahill, one of the applicants, explained that the variance was requested at the suggestion of the Planning and Zoning Commission. The proposal, Mr. Cahill said, is to subdivide part of a 9.47 acre tract located north of Lower Muscatine Road and east of First Avenue into lots for disposition to potential commercial buyers for development. However, the lots cannot be subdivided without frontage upon a public street unless the Board of Adjustment interprets the Ordinance to constitute permission to allow the lots to front upon an officially approved place. If permission is granted for the lots to front upon a private drive instead of upon a public street, there would be limited access on to First Avenue, Mr. Cahill said. Board member Dickens questioned whether the drives would be concrete or blacktop. Mr. Cahill indicated that they would be blacktop. Don Schmeiser Senior Planner, stated that if the drives are private, the City would not be responsible for maintenance and would not force any particular requirements upon construction. Mr. Schmeiser also indicated that there are several access points into the development and, therefore, there would be no problem with fire and emergency vehicles. Mr. Robert Ilibbeler, Executive Director of Goodwill Industries, stated that the plan is attractive for that particular locale but he was concerned about whether Goodwill Industries would have access to the officially approved place in this development. Mr. Hibbeler stated that verbal assurance had been given that this access would be available and Goodwill Industries would rely on this assurance. A motion was made by Dickens, seconded by Fowles, to interpret the Zoning Code in such a way as will not be contrary to public interest where owing to special conditions by permitting lots to front upon a driveway designated as an officially approved place. A vote was taken: Dickens -Yes; Fowles -Yes; z n e ,I O rl m D rn .a v z "' 0 O rm _ r D o V• z n MINUTES IOWA CITY RIVERFRONT COMMISSION • CITY MANAGER'S CONFERENCE ROOM SEPTEMBER 9, 1976 MEMBERS PRESENT: Bassett, Brandrup, Fahr, Horton, Lindberg, Thayer, Vetter STAFF PRESENT: Flowers, Geshwiler, Milkman, Showalter GUESTS: Jody Muslin (KXIC), David Perret SUMMARY OF DISCUSSION AND FORMAL ACTION TAKEN: The Iowa City Riverfront Commission met in Regular Session on September 9, 1976,. with Chairperson Fahr presiding. * Brandrup moved and Bassett seconded that the minutes of the June 17, 1976, meeting be approved as written. Unanimous. Showalter reported on land costs for the Showers property. He indicated that he had been informed that an offer to buy the 55 acres between the Gordon Russell property for $50,000 had been turned down and that the owners would still prefer to sell to the City than to private interests. This tract had been appraised at $500 and $800 per acre. The owners also turned down an offer to buy 130 acres, part of which is the land on which the houses lie, for $130,000. • * Following further discussion, Thayer moved and Bassett seconded.that.the Chairperson of the Riverfront Commission write a letter to the City Council asking what funds the Commission can expect for planning on the river corridor project and referring to the earlier understanding that the funds that were allocated for river corridor land acquisition and then re—allocated to Urban Renewal were to be replaced at a. later time. Unanimous. It was also pointed out that the information would be helpful for budgeting. The Iowa River Brochure was discussed with Fahr commending the Staff for their work on the project. The brochure will be completed in the near future and will be mailed to various organizations and hand delivered to various businesses. Brandrup thanked Horton for his work on the historical aspects of the brochure. Commission requested that copies of the brochure be mailed with the minutes. Fahr reported on the River Corridor District Management Ordinance, indicating that the Riverfront Commission was cooperating with the City Attorney's office in researching the project. He also added that two law students were workingon.;the project and that they would be doing research on flood plain zoning and Development Rights Transfer Statutes. The Riverfront Commission's recommendation that the City Council put a moratorium on building in the flood plain of the Iowa River was discussed, with Chairperson Fahr referring to a letter written by the City Attorney dated October 17, 1975. He pointed out that it did not seem that the City Council could impose a moratorium • until there is an amendment to the zoning ordinance. Milkman reported that the Iowa River had been surveyed by the U.S. Geological Survey and that that map would be accepted by HUD to be the flood plain map. She 0 0 Minutes Page 2 September 9, 1976 • also reported that the flood plain ordinance needs to be completed in six months in order to receive flood insurance. The ordinance needs to be approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission and the Ralston Creek Coordinating Committee. Milkman Indicated that the City has yet to receive site plans for the Highway 218 area and Mesquakie and Sturgis Ferry Parks from Stanley, Consultants.but..that they * should be completed by the end of September. Bassett moved and Thayer seconded that the Staff obtain 50 copies of the site plans for the Highway 218 area and Mesquakie and Sturgis Ferry Parks. Unanimous. Milkman announced that there would be a series of workshops on citizen participation in the Comprehensive Plan during the fall. It was also decided that.the Riverfront Commission's canoe trip down the Iowa River would be either on September 17 or on September 24 beginning at 9:30 a.m. Milkman said that she would notify the Commission members as to the date of the trip when the plans were finalized. Fahr announced that Mayor Neuhauser had suggested that the Riverfront,Commission establish a Budget Subcommittee and that he would appoint that committee in the near future. Brandrup inquired if the City Council had adopted Phase II of the River Corridor Study as official policy as requested in the Riverfront Commission's recommendation of May 27, 1976. Fahr indicated that he had heard no reaction and that he would • check on the matter. An error was pointed out in the May 27, 1976, minutes and it was requested that the motion regarding adoption of Phase III of the River Corridor.Study_as,official policy be corrected to read Phase II. Milkman announced that Council members deProsse and Selzer would, be making a presen- tation to the City Council regarding expansion of the membership of the Riverfront Commission in the near future. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 4:45 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Ellen R. Flowers, Secretary • MINUTES IOWA CITY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT AUGUST 4, 1976 -- 3:30 P.M. CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS MEMBERS PRESENT: Dickens, Fowles, McBride MEMBERS ABSENT: Goedken, Malcolm STAFF PRESENT: Schmeiser, Child DISCUSSION AND FORMAL ACTIONS TAKEN: Acting as Chairman, McBride called the meeting to order and asked if there were any corrections or additions to the minutes of the meeting held on June 2, 1976. A motion was made by Dickens, seconded by Fowles, to approve the minutes as written. The motion carried unanimously. V-7607. Application submitted by Mr. Dave Cahill and Mr. Pat Harding to permit lots at 1705 First Avenue to front upon a private drive or an "officially approved place" in lieu of upon a public street; date filed: 7/14/76. Mr. Dave Cahill, one of the applicants, explained that the variance was requested at the suggestion of the Planning and Zoning Commission. The proposal, Mr. Cahill said, is to subdivide part of a 9.47 acre tract located north of Lower Muscatine Road and east of First Avenue into lots for disposition to potential commercial buyers for development. However, the lots cannot be subdivided without frontage upon a public street unless the Board of Adjustment interprets the Ordinance to constitute permission to allow the lots to front upon an officially approved place. If permission is granted for the lots to front upon a private drive instead of upon a public street, there would be limited access on to First Avenue, Mr. Cahill said. . Board member Dickens questioned whether the drives would be concrete or blacktop. Mr. Cahill indicated that they would be blacktop. Don Schmeiser Senior Planner, stated that if the drives are private, the City would not be responsible for maintenance and would not force any particular requirements upon construction. Mr. Schmeiser also indicated that there are several access points into the development and, therefore, there would be no problem with fire and emergency vehicles. Mr. Robert Hibbeler, Executive Director of Goodwill Industries, stated that the plan is attractive for that particular locale but he was concerned about whether Goodwill Industries would have access to the officially approved place in this development. Mr. Hibbeler stated that verbal assurance had been given that this access would be available and Goodwill Industries would rely on this assurance. A motion was made by Dickens, seconded by Fowles, to interpret the Zoning Code in such a way as will not be contrary to public interest where owing to special conditions by permitting lots to front upon a driveway designated as an officially approved place. A vote was taken: Dickens -Yes; Fowles -Yes; In -2- McBride-Yes; Goedken-Absent; and Malcolm -Absent. The variance was granted. The election of officers was postponed until such time as the full Board could be present. The meeting adjourned. MINUTES IOWA CITY PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION RECREATION CENTER ROOM B SEPTEMBER 22, 1976 MEMBERS PRESENT: Boutelle, Cilek, Davis, Kelley, Mascher, Powell, Sangster, Stockman, Thayer STAFF PRESENT: Fenzlein, Flowers, Howell, Lee, Peck, Schmeiser, Showalter GUESTS: Jody Muslin, Vernon Klanda, Dorothy Klanda, V. Begley, Wayne Begley, A. J. Soucek, Martha Feuchter, Marsha Linder, Terry Smothers, Derek Willard RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE CITY COUNCIL: I. That Northeast Park be named Pheasant Hill Park. RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: I. That since Happy Hollow Park is small, heavily used and crowded and the problems would be intensified by rezoning the Hayek property from R 2 to R 3, the Park and Recreation Commission recommends that the application for rezoning be denied. RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE STAFF: 1. That the Staff explore the possibility of purchasing the Hayek property adjacent to Happy Hollow Park. SUMMARY OF DISCUSSION AND FORMAL ACTION TAKEN: The Iowa City Park and Recreation Commission met in Regular Session on September 22 with Vice -Chairperson Stockman presiding. * It was moved and seconded that the minutes of the July 14, 1976, meeting be approved as written. Unanimous. It was announced that Robin Powell had been re -appointed as the School. Board Repre- sentative to the Commission. Chairperson Cilek arrived at the meeting. Due to the illness of Billie Hauber, Showalter reported on the progress of the Washington Street project from Van Buren Street to Muscatine Avenue. He indicated that Herm Thompson, the landscape architect designing the project, had suggested removing the steps at the northeast corner of College Green Park and installing a ramp and also removing the steps at the northwest corner. Thompson also proposed some brick work in the park. A neighborhood meeting will be called after tentative approval of the plan by Project GREEN, which should be within 3 to 4 weeks. Sangster was appointed to work on setting up that neighborhood meeting. Stockman reported that the Park Naming Subcommittee had walked the Northeast Park neighborhood in order to get suggestions from the residents regarding the naming of the park but had received none. The Subcommittee was going to recommend the name "Green Mountain Park" but after receiving a letter from Jennifer White (see n U Minutes Page 2 September 22, 1976 * attached), it changed its recommendation to "Pheasant Hill Park." Powell moved and Stockman seconded that the Park and Recreation Commission recommend that Northeast Park be named Pheasant Hill Park. Unanimous. Harry Ostrander, Director, University of Iowa Division of Recreational Services, was present to discuss the University fee structure. He indicated that the fee Philosophy differed depending upon the type of activity. Regarding informal use of University facilities, he reported that two activities, tennis and raquetball, had been selected for which a fee is charged. Ostrander also reported that fees are charged for services for which there are replacement costs in order to cover those costs. He then reported indicating that they would rather r the status of the University tennis court lights, have a differentiated fee to raise revenue than have coin operated lights. The lights will be controlled from a tennis pro shop. Schmeiser, Department of Community Development, reported that the developers of the Village Green Addition had offered to donate a 40' strip of green space along the railroad tracks to the City. If the City does not accept, the land will be donated to a home owners' association. The Planning and Zoning Commission referred this matter to the Part; and Recreation Commission, feeling that 40' was not adequate. Schmeiser indicated that there was a possibility of obtaining a series of triangles along the 40' strip in addition to the strip itself. He also indicated that the City could make some agreement with the developers regarding the triangles when the first portion is brought to the City for approval. Boutelle pointed out that the drainage in that area runs toward the railroad tracks and that the area flooded easily. He added that this problem would be compounded by development. Showalter stated his feeling that he did not want the 40' strip without the triangles and added that there was a possibility of utilizing the strip as a bike path. Showalter indicated that he had polled the Commission prior to the meeting regarding the proposed donation at the request of the Planning and Zoning Commission and that they had voted in favor of dedication of the 40' strip of land along with triangular areas to the City. The Planning and Zoning Commission passed this recommendation on to the City Council. A request that the City purchase the Hayek property adjacent to Happy Hollow Park was discussed with Schmeiser indicati denied. He reported that this rezonng that the Hayeks had applied to rezone the land from R 2 to R 3 and that the Staff was recommending that the application be ing would not change the number of family units but would change the type of units. Mascher expressed concern about development and indicated that she favored purchase of the property by the City. Kelley stated that the playground/diamond problem would not be solved if the property was developed. Showalter reported that there was a possibility of purchasing a strip of land north Of Happy Hollow Park now owned by Metro Pavers. The approximate cost would be $9,100. He indicated that a retaininwall could be installed and the area used for play equipment or it could be used for parking. He also stated that it was Possible that arrangements could be made to use the Johnson County Social Services parking lot and a path could be built from the lot he was in favor of purchasing the Hayek property. to the park. He then said that Minutes Page 3 September 22, 1976 past Wayne use gofythethen propertyibyftlierCitypandneighborhoodres hHayek property, referring elings about the Happy Hollow .Park and what effects development of the property would have upon it. In the event the land would not be purchased by the City, he stated that he would consider asking the Commission to abandon use of the diamond at the park. He also stated that he would be in favor of purchasing the land to the north. Marsha Linder, Derek Willard, Dr. A. T. Soucek and Dorothy Klanda also voiced support for purchasing the Hayek property. A petition was presented indicating support for purchasing the Property. Boutelle pointed out that if the Hayek property was developed, there would be an adverse affect on the park with regard to its use as a storm water detention area. * Powell moved and Mascher seconded that since Happy Hollow Park is small, heavily used and crowded and the problems would be intensified by rezoning the Hayek property from R 2 to R 3, the Park and Recreation Commission recommend that the application for rezoning be denied. Unanimous. Showalter stated that he would be in favor of deferring the purchase of an addition * to Hickory Hill Park and purchasing the Hayek property at fair market value. Mascher moved and Thayer seconded that the Staff explore the possibility of purchasing the Hayek property adjacent to Happy Hollow Park. Boutelle, Cilek, Kelley, Mascher, Powell, Sangster and Stockman voted aye and Davis voted nay. Motion carried. The Commission requested that discussion of the Hayek property be put on the agenda for the October meeting. Adams handed out copies of a fee comparison of cities in Iowa. Discussion was deferred to the October meeting. * Election of officers was held and Mascher moved and Sangster seconded that Stockman * be nominated for Chairperson. Kelley moved and Davis seconded that nominations be * closed. Unanimous. Stockman was unanimously elected Chairperson. Kelley moved and * Stockman seconded that Mascher be nominated for Vice -Chairperson. It was moved and seconded that nominations be closed. Unanimous. Vice -Chairperson. Mascher was unanimously elected Cilek reported that the Park and Recreation Commission By -Laws had been approved by the City Council. He also indicated that the Commission needed to approve the Park and Recreation Commission Ordinance which was discussed earlier in the year. Thayer * moved and Powell seconded that the Park and Recreation CO)=ission approve the Park and Recreation Commission Ordinance. Unanimous. It Was requested that copies of both the By -Laws and the Ordinance be mailed to the Commission members. Showalter indicated that there was a possibility of using Revenue Sharing funds for purchase of the Kemp property (north of Happy Hollow Park). Cilek stated his feeling that if the City could not purchase the Hayek property, it should purchase the Kemp Property. There was a concensus of the Commission that the Staff should also pursue the possibility of use of the Social Services parking lot and access from that lot to Happy Hollow Park. Black Springs Circle Park was discussed and Thayer moved and Boutelle seconded that the * Staff explore the possibility of a trade involving Black Springs Circle Park and the Minutes Page 4 September 22, 1976 Kemp property. Boutelle and Thayer voted aye with Cilek, Davis, Kelley, Powell, Sangster and Stockman voting nay and Mascher abstaining. Motion defeated. Kelley * then moved and Thayer seconded that the Staff attempt to sell Black Springs Circle Park. Boutelle, Kelley and Thayer voted aye with Cilek, Mascher, Powell, Sangster and Stockman voting nay and Davis abstaining. Motion defeated. Staff will report back on the status of use of the Social Services parking lot and the possibility of Purchasing the Hayek or Kemp properties. Showalter reported that he had attended both the Mid -Continent Park and Recreation Association Regional Conference and the Iowa Park and Recreation Association Annual Meeting. He also reported that a pilot program was being implemented at Hawkeye Court Apart- ments which will include outdoor activities. The program will be held on Saturday mornings for approximately 135 children. He added that the program is only open to Hawkeye Court residents and that there would be no cost to the participants. Showalter also reported that there would be an ASERP program held at Mark IV Apartments. Showalter indicated that the City Park tennis court nets had been repaired but that the courts were cracked. He stated that there was a possibility that the courts should never have been built at that location in the first place due to flooding and that it appeared the courts had settled, causing the cracks. Cilek indicated that the Fees and Charges Subcommittee would meet to review the Fees and Charges Policy and appointed Mascher to that Subcommittee. Stockman commented that continued support for committees was needed. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 10:07 p.m. Respectfully submitted, GGG�U /Q j22�YK.� Ellen R. Flowers, Secretary t 1dINUTES WITED ACTION MR YOUTH I September 23, 1976 311-N. Linn Street : b The meeting.was called to order at 4:10 p.m. Members Present: Jeff Schabillion, Tom Mikelson, Mary Larew, - co Adrien Meyers, Diane Dennis coMembers Absent: Leisa Fearing, ipnnis Hedges, Polly Arp,- , Roberta Patrick - U Staff Present: Jim Swaim, La=y Schmidt v Notes on Board 0 Membersr Diane Dennis was'duly.elected to the board as a youth representative, she is a senior at City N High 'and 'has been actively involved with UAY. _ N tl') Mark Stuart -and Bill Munn have: both regretfully declined membership on the board due to heavy ; work loads but Goth offered support in the future ifcalled upon..Al Horowitz was suggested as Q someone who was interested. Recommendations to the Board: - +-� Schmidt: Renovation of the basement hJ " Schmidt:Proposal for horseback and roller skating outings dJ Schmidt: Request for app_-oval'of time to attend MAA workshop in Des'Moines from October 11-15. Q Schmidt: Discussion on d -^-erg presentation to be held: : in schools N o` Meyers: Request for Jia and Larry to make a presentation b for counselors of the city schools X Schmidt: Discussion of tutoring program O .D . Summary of discussion and formal action taken: 1. Pending approval of the Friends,' permission was given by the board to paint the basement a bright' color,'' and acquire carpet and lamps from Goodwill when available. :Jeff.Schabilllon offered to contact` Gilpin's-:concerning a possible paie'Irdonation as Mr. Gilpin - has been on the Board of UAY and continues: in his support of t' program. united action for youth =- alternatives for young people 1640 skills ,which he acquired this summer. A discussion the policy on staff development, the consensus o£ the board was to liberalizethe policy. - 4. Both Jim and Larry advocate presentation of a drug seminar In the schools. This met with muchapprovaland Adrien requested the presentation be given at a meeting of all counselors in the city schools. 5• A University of Iowa student Doric Nickelsberg, is offering volunteer time every afternoon to handle the office. 6. Discussion of the tutoring program was brought up by Larry. Thnre have been many calls for tutors, primarily from the con- relors at the junior high schools. _Adrien_spoke most favorably concerning the past experiences she had encountered.. At the Open House conducted on September 15 many of the city librarians had _commented on the fact that'UAY was the only place they knew to get volunteer tutors. It was agreed that we would continue to offer this service on an informal basis, noting that it cost nothing to match requests with volunteers. - 7. Jim announced that United Way would hold "a big garage sale Saturday, September 25 from 9 to 5• He encouraged the Board to to participate. The meeting was adjourned at 5:00 p.m. The next meeting was set for Thursday, October 21, 1976 a.t 4:00 p.m. Respectf411Y submitted, i Mary -A Larew UAY Secretary of the Board RESOLUTION NO. -76-361 RESOLUTION APPROvING CLASS A LIQUOR CONTROL LICENSE APPLTMTO BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF IOWA CITY, IOWA, that a Class Liquor Control License application is hereby approve or the followingg named person or persons at the following described location - Women's Restaurant Project, Inc. dba%Grace'& Rubies, 209 N. Linn_ Said approval shall be subject to any conditions or re- strictions hereafter imposed by ordinance or State law. The City .Clerk shall cause a recommendation -for approval to he endorsed upon the application and forward the same together with the license fee,'certificate of financial` responsibility, surety 'bond „_sketch of the premises--and-all- other information or documents required to the'Iowa Beer and Liquor Control Department. It was moved by Foster and seconded b that the Resolution as rea a adopted, and upon ro 1 call there were: RESOLUTION N0. 76-362 RESOLUTION TO REFUND CIGARETTE PERMIT WHEREAS,; Central Vendors, Inca/dba/Amer §Rn Legion Post'#17 in Iowa City, Iowa, has surrendered cigarette permit No: expiring June 30 19 77 and requests a refund on the unused portion - ortionthereof,'now thereof, nowtherefore, ' BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY _COUNCIL 'OF IOWA CITY, IOWA, that cigarette permit No. 77-36 issued to Central_ Vendors. Inc be cancelled, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor and City Clerk be and they :are hereby authorized and directed to draw a warrant on the General Fund in the -amount of $ 75.00 , payable to Central.Vendors, Inc. as a refund on cigarette permit No.77-36 It was moved bY Foster ferret and seconded by that the Resolution as read be adopted, and upon roll call there were: AYES:NAYS: BSE Balmer x deProsse x Foster x Neuhauser x Perret x Selzer x Vevera x Passed this 5th day of October 19 76 , 1 F E B �CEIVED SEP3 0 1976 SEP 3 0 1976 TRINITY EPISCOPAL CHURCH A B B I E S T O L F U S 320 FAST col.iscr STxrrr totvA CITY, IOWA 52290 - CITY CLERK September 29, 1976 Mary C. Neuhauser, Mayor Iowa City Civic Center Iowa City, Iowa 52240 ' Dear Mary: I wish to register my personal complaint concerning the newly in policy of the Iowa City Police Department of not 'issuing`citat. s to per- sons -Who Violate the privacy of others b refer, specifically to violators who -co -by par y parking on private property. :I erty`of Trinity Church provided along thealley-at-thenrear opfi_vate prop- erty rop- ing,between College, Washington, Linn, and Gilbert. The Church maintains several our build- parking spaces for the use of its employees and members ;of the parish. performing special duties in`the church. 'We have; issued courtesy:° cards; to first-time offendors, and have stated that continued violation of our privacy would make it necessary for -us -to call the ' ment. Until' recently, the ICPD was ,most coopDepart- erative Policewhen we called, and would ticket'; the violators. Now the response is that we can have the cars hauled away. Were we to follow that policy, we would have -a tow truck in the alley almost the entire day. What is happening is that violators know that the Police Department will not issue citations if they violate our privac'park at e to pa one of the convenient city lots where they would havy toy, so rather than ;park, they park on private property. This is becoming a real problem for those of us in the inner business district. We at `Trinity, Church do not wish to 'do anything that would detract= from what we believe to be a good public image. tive, but our generosity has not always been received in the spirit given. 9 We have tried `to be, coopera- 'We trust the Iowa City City Council will review this offer some alternative to ha vin a Policy and perhaps all, the City does receive the revenuesfrom parking parked cars`. parked; on y, After private property. I hope you Will -be able_to:review this policy, Particularly as it regards those property owners adjacent vi city. owned - With lots. With every good wish, I am Sincerely yours, Garr �' Robert E. Holzhamme �L"Y Rector 46xwi' SERVING THE UNIVERSITY OF IOWA - Dr. Adrian: Ftogben - -2- October 16, 1976 audiograms.- This would allow hearing capabilities. you and the City to establish If You then suspected a he Present Years, comparison o Of future loss in audiograms subsequent diagnosingan 9 ams would assist both.of _ y suspected loss. us, in The City would pay for the audiograms performed at this time. cost; of 2 would like to inform you that attest of the siren system will performed at 10:00 a: m. .on Tuesday; now ,tie _ October 19, 1976.' .The system is complete,, and this test'wi11 Bete to be rmine accepted. Future test if'the contractor's Cork is Civil Defense test time of 9:�OOfatme system_will•be held-at the "r on the-f"irst, Mond regular y °f each month We are certain that no hearin of your household,"so we wing damage will ,be caused you menti Since are with members ;we to s°undeed not able.to schedule. ' '.on October - testing,of Lthe siren _ 19, 1976, 'we tmethe'tet - at would like: know-£rom yO -home be possible to you soon .if it would arrange for a sound meter test.--at.-.9-00 November 1, 1976. Please a m.-, tlonwou , contact't4r. Struve,about.`the test and audiograms at -sound nater your earliest convenience: Sincerely, Neal G: Berlin _ City tfanager 3 'NGB:bac. .,,. �cc- Tom Struve. -. City. Council 3J • eeptember 29, 1976 To: THE MAYOR OF IOWA CITY, MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL From: CITIZENS CONCERNED ABOUT THE FUTURE OF HAPPY: HOLLOW PARK We :would like to bring to your attention two;petitions;concerning Happy Hollow Park and "adjoining property, dated September 15 and 17, and submitted to the Planning and Zoning Commission and -the Parks and Recreation Commission:on September 16 and 22, respectively. The petitions have two major. objectives: 1) to request denial of the application _(Z -7614)' -submitted on August 26, 1976 by Mr. and Mrs. Will J. Hayek, requesting -that a tract of land lying to the west of Happy Hollow Park be rezoned from R2 to R3q 2) to recommend that the City explore the possibility of purchasing the undeveloped portion of the Hayek,tract, ae a'permanent and much -needed - addition to the -existing -Happy Hollow facility. Concerning the first objective, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted on September 16 to seek the opinion of the Parks and Recreation_ Comm ission- concerning the Hayekrezoningproposal. On September 22, the Parka and Aecreation Commission -voted -to -_recommend that the 'proposal `be denied, on the grounds that R3 development of the property would have an injurious effect - on both the Happy Hollow Park and the immediate neighborhood. The staff report of the'.Planning and Zoning Department has also recommended, denial of the rezoning; application, which will again be considered at the Commission's next meeting. Concerning the second objective'it should be noted that, on September 22, the Parks and Recreation Commissionalso voted in favor of our petition, recommending that the Director of Parks and.Recreation explore the:, possibility of purchasing the undeveloped -Hayek tract as a permanent addition to Happy. Hollow Park. '`In the discussion of this recommendation „ the majority of;the members of the'Commission seemed in agreement with our position that development of any kind on the Hayek tract would have a diasastrous effect on the playground "facility, which'.needs to be expanded rather Qisn'dGnSntsfied'. The Director of. -Parks, Mr. Dennis Showalter, pointed out that, in hie opinion, acquisition of _the Hayek tract'19 crucial to the future of the Happy_Hollow=Park, and should be given top priority within the development program of the entire park ' system .; It was also pointed out that, gt,present,' the Happy.Hollow Park is for its-sizethe:most widely used park in Iowa City, bein& used by more. than 40 softball -"teams during the summer,in addition to neighborhood recreational use. _Evidence for widespread; community support of the proposal to add the Hayek tract to the -park is furnished by the attached petition, which bears almost 400 signatures collected in"a four-day period. WE THEREFORE URGE THE CITY COUNCIL to include_ a public discussion of our petition nt the earliest possible meeting of the City-Council,so that the Citizens Concerned about the Future of Happy Hollow Parkcanhave an opportunity to presenttheirviews. Wayne Begb (for the Citizens' Committee) 804 Ronalds'Street Iowa 'City, , Iowa CITY. CLERK.;"" ` 70/ I September 17, 1976 To: THE M,%YOR OF IOAA CITY, DMIBERS OF TILE CITY COUNCIL, A14D 1EMBERS OF THE PARKS AND RECREATION 00,01ISSION From: CITIZENS CONCERNED ABOUT THE FUTURE OF HAPPY HOLLOSJ.PARK WHEREAS an application (Z-7614) has been submitted to the Planning requesting tilatlastractnoAugust 26, 1976 by lir, and Mrs. 4Ji11 J: Hayeki, Zoning I g f land located on the north side of the 700 block of Brown Street, between Dodge Street and the happy Hollow Park, be rezoned from R2 to R3; - AND WHEREAS .the owners of 75% of the property directly fronting the Hayek tract on Brown Street have petitioned the Planning and Zoning Commission to deny the rezoning application on the grounds that R3 development of the property would be incompatible with the existing predominently single-family residential character of the neighborhood; -- - AND WHEREAS the Planning and Zoning Commission, at'a public meeting held on September 16, voted to seek the opinion of the Parks and Recreation Department about the effect that R3 development might'.have on -the adjoining Happy Hollow Park; AND WHEREAS for many years the undeveloped portion of the:Hayek tract has, in.effect, constituted a much -used part of the playground comlex which it adjoins; THEREFORE, WE THE UNDERSIGNED DO HEREBY PETITION the Parks; and Recreation Commission to recommend that the rezoning „application be denied and`to,explore the possibilities of purchasing the undeveloped ,portion of the Hayek tract as a much-needed permanent addition to the existing,_ Happy Hollow Park. While we gratefully' acknowledge the generosity of Mr. and I•irs. Hayek in allowing their property to be used` -by the ;'public„ for so -manv vears_`we strnn81-v hplinvp 01_tV lF .,..., 1--A 12, /7 _ �.e /7 PETITION OF CITIZENS CONCERNED ABORT THE F[IPU2E OF HAPPY.HOLL P,Oa PARK equesting that the Parks and Recreation ' Possibility of purchasing the ,Comrission-explore undeveloped -tract of land to the - the irest as a:permanent and much—needed addition to the existing Happy'Hollow facility`, Name Address Tel: No. 23r- 3• -3 `Jsz 12, /7 _ �.e /7 G 'L I &SO117 33 Civ?) n (.;o 3 33 0 s'�L:Z 23. s: �5 0 7- 9�p. z �, -3��� 27. 3-4 31.G�'� o, ���l�l,tS ��+ T �:� I )C Ltd'-4;�> _U PETITION OF. -CITIZENS CONCERNED ABOUT THE FUTURE OF HAPPf;HOLLU PARK Requesting that the Parks and Recreation Commission explore the. possibility of purchasing the undeveloped tract of land to the vest" as a,permanent and much-needed addition to the existing Happy Hollow facility, Name Address Tela No. 541 72/ u��yc PS`�"'�/ �'o } I��nalGf�'1r's�. 35-f - IfS3 5y, 337 — 5�3 00O a�.s',5�. X54-1RS3 /o3, JCG.,{,&✓ 713 �I �4 . c.-�t. '337 yl� is �, Vic, �.a�a� �2/, To -L f✓ . 7L7 k` 7c ( %ro 3 dr7-j 9/ —7 06, �o) _AU a 35 — 17 /!o o� .338 776 `3/� F.. e'0 P:TITION OF CITIZENS CONCMMED- ABOUT THE FUTURE OF HAPPY HOLLU.?'PARK Requesting that the Parks and Recreation Cormission explore the possibility of purchasing the undeveloped' tract of land :to the' -west as a,pernanent and much-needed addition to the existing_Happy Hollol+ fact hty� Name Address Tel. No. /j `3 147, /}Grr�C1 57- ' o /' u.Ik 3S7-39(0 iso�•� y CiGLr till �' 3 'Aiwvron-T ,hr,rn fid, ��o� �\��\ CflO`� 0.xrnc��p, - •� `'•• /s? I/ y� _ r II • • - PETITION OF CITIZENS CONCERNED ABOUT THE FUTURE OF H-APP't,HOLLOrJ PARK Requesting that the Parks and Recreation Commission explore the; possibility of purchasing the-undeveloped tract of land to the west as a permanent and much-needed addition to the existing Happy Hollow facility, '- Name- Address' Tel': No. /do- 1� p ev- Ve.\ &-ye /61, 3osePhv�t (dc.-tel�, (a3U tj vgcl QU✓e 33 7- a 7.7, P I o' u d 333 166.E 167, 20 33'7 S}�z /dy, l �'1� u1 ✓ 1 /�o, f.11wcfts� � �°`^i`�,�r ��'� ��1NeN•-� •3s1- (;,�..C. IzsZ �/NR2� ILIx%09' % Sorg i�y2 T 3�/ ln63,: 541'7- �3s- rSo� �AQ PETITION OF CITIZENS CONCERNED ABOUT THE FUTURE OF HAPPY'_HOLLO7 PABX Parks ` nd Recreation 1Et Requesting that the _ possibility of purchasing the undevelopedCt act ofnland theeirest to the existing Happy Hollow facility. as a.,permanent and much-needed addition _ - Address Tel. No. Name 3z-:.dna C909 35 aloe 33g� �a-oy gl � ?meq �i�i� �•;favr���{ J�''. 33�' 33.3 ` e- ai9 ,5 Sav�S� oroa Rao.. qal, l`a cr CG-� 3 3 S1- 0 /eZ 79 P::TITION OF CITIZENS CONCEIZ`IED ABOUT THE FUSURE OF HAPPY IIOLLOi7 PARK Requesting that the Parks and'Rec_'eation Commission explore the Possibility of purchasing the undeveloped tract of land to the west as a permanent and much-needed addition to -the existing Happy Hollow fachty< Name Address Tel No. �y3 ags� aAAA LA�� z�S.e�>,s 33� 55, I PETITION OF CITIZENS_CUYCMIED ABOUT THE FUTURE OF HAPPY HOU6,4, PARK Requesting'.that the `Parks `and Recreation Commission e::plore the possibility of purchasing -the undeveloped tract of landto the. west as a penianent and much-needed addition to the existing Happy Hollowfacility, I PETITION OFCITIZENSCONCERNED AUOUT THE FUTURE OF HAPPY HOLLO:T PARK Requesting that the Parks and Recreation Commission explore the.; L�llrsc� possibility of purchasing the undeveloped tract of land to the test as a permanent and much-needed addition to the existing Happy Hollow. facilitye' Name Address Tel.' No. ' L�llrsc� PETITION OF CITI7.ENS CONCERNLD ABOUT Ti1L FUTURE OF 11APPY HOLLM PARK Requesting, that the Parks and Recreation_ Commission explore the possibility of purchasing the undeveloped tract of 'land to the Brest' as a`permanent arid much-needed addition to` -the existing Happy Ho11ow facility. : - flame ;j Address Tel. Noy/ 70 &30 3 30 3/9 3 sj 349 L►zJ7en.61 -4a Fersoh Avenve 338 096 . '/ l 3�O �ciure 11 �I�InAZaY�, _ !Sof Ye-io e// S�. 338-.95 86. A,, G t Y3 Y7 a Y 392 C�112��� �z���4���• ni � rte/ ��:�.�•� »_ .:-3 �J- ,�,�s5� 3733 %9 �� di`. `�i ��1A .�—� �. i r�ui l"C.. L'T n: t,n 3-7';'. iz2c� O )e j Exnx 7-77 92 � ' / f p.( 1_� / to l L r �/) CoY7..7.L '. • % .� �� , L- � )�iC� tum � -.�.. September 17, 1976 To: THE I•L%YOR OF I0;4A CITY, MIEMURS OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND MEMBERS OF THE Plu2KS AI4D RECREATION CDI•FfISSION From: CITIZENS CONCEItNED ABOUT THE FUTURE OF HAPPY HOLLOW PARK WHEREAS an application (Z-7614) has been submitted to the Planning and Zoning Commission on August 66, 1976 by Mr. and 1•irs': ?•gill J. annik, requesting that a tract of land located on the north'side oll J- Ha block of-BrownStreet, betweenDodge-Streetandthe Happy_HollPark;: be rezoned,from R2 to'R3; ow AND 1111ZR,EAS the owners of 75`h of the property directly fronting Hayek tract on.Broim Street have petition -the Commission: to deny tile ed the Planning and Zoning e rezoning application on the grounds that R3dee`ofthe ` property would be incompatible with tile vel.opmnt e ccistinpredominantly si residential character of the neighborhood; ngle-family AND U11E3EAS the Planning and Zoning Commission, at a public meeting held -on September 16, voted to seek the opinion of the Parks and Recreation Department about the effect that P,3 development might :have on the adjoining Happy Hollow Park; AND WMEREaS for many years the undeveloped portion of the Hayek tract has, in effect, constituted a much -used -part of t -hr_ corttlex which it adjoins; playground THEREFORE, WE THE VNDERSIGNED DO HEREBY PETITION the Parks and Recreatioa.CoMmission to recommendthat :the rezoning-,applicati and to explore the possibilities` of purchasing the undeveloped on be denied po=tion of the Hayek tract as a much-needed permanent addition'to the existing Happy Hollow park. While we gratefully acknowledge the; generosity of Mr. and I•as. Hayek in allowing their property tobe used by the _public for, so many years, we strongly believe that development of any kind would have a disastrous effect upon the existing Park facilit needs to be expanded rather than dimy--which inished in size. In order -to :adequately meet the recreational needs of the community and,, thecity as a whole, the, Happy IiO llou.Park should ideally be doubled in size,e;:panding ' both to the west and to the north before further development occurs in eithar direction. In malting this petition at this point in time,:t•,e would like to remind the Cotmnission that .several years ago, the citizens of Iowa City approved z bond issue which included'fnnds for, purchasing the property,adjoining 11z,Pty hollow Park, a perchase which unfortunately never came about ��r ,t_ Seel 2 D . . d' SLC./9�n�LCc�.cz,E,. cZZ�� cls 1976.. U ABBIE.STOLFUS (TY, CLERK L.E �o3 I- 337-�/,G %n r— Z—V qz, 4/, 3 3 6 --2Sss 1 I f- • • loi P:iMON OF CITIZENS CONCERNED ABOLM THE FUTURE OF IIAPPY I! }j, o.,...�AP.IC D�- P.eguestin- that the-.Paris.El and 12ecrcation-Commission explordJtxSEP22.1976 possibility of purchasing the undeveloped tract of land to the"west as, it permanent and much-needed addition to the existing H,&{y' EuacsTfakFi4,?` 'CITY CLERK". ivaci� Address Tel. No. I f- P TITI O t OF CITIZENS CONC" FtPI'U ABOUT TIIE `FLUTRE OF HAPPY- HOLL I,"I i l - Requasting rUiat the ",rks and P.ecrea i.on Conni si.on e.cplore t possibility of purchauing the undcvcloped_tract of land to the-weStl- i9 as a permanent and much-needed addition to theexisting_ Happ))6��]+f"S3yil CgTT GLEVR Nar Q -Addy. ess �Tcl ' i' hyo -A /L I 0-3 0 PETITION OF CITIZENS D, CONCERNED A50UT THE FUTURE OF HAPPY-HaL0BM,2 jQ76' Requesting that the Parks and.Recreation Commission explore the possibility of purchasing; the undeveloped tract of land t*&B� ISTOLFUS as a permanent and much-needed addition to the.existing Happy !(!�WvCEER(ity- Name Address Tal. No. ` l 7 ZY�� I %/02-v��✓vt _ ::3 -3-7 - `. •.»., RESOLUTION NO. 76-365 PRELIMINARY & FINAL LSRD FOR A & 11 APARVIENTS WHEREAS, the owners, Cary E. Albertson and Garry R. Hamdorf, -. have filed with the City Clerk of l.owa City, Iowa, in application for approval of a revised preliminary and final large scale residential development and revised preliminary.. plannedarea development of - -' A & H Apartments covering the following described premises located - - - in Iowa City, Johnson County, Iowa, to -wit:. - - Commencing at the Southwest corner of the NW 1/4, NE 1/4 Section 1.7, T79N R6W of the 5th Principal Meridian; Thence S 88° 34' 22" E, 1124.14 feet on the south line of Part One MacBride Addition, an addition to the City of Iowa City, Iowa, according to the plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 9, page 31, Plat Records of Johnson County, ,Iowa; Thence N 0° 21' 53" E, 484.17 feet, on the easterly line of said addition to the northeast corner of Lot 24 of said addition; Thence N 89* 56' 42" W, 200.00 feet to the North- west corner of. said Lot 24, and the point of. beginning; Thence S 0' 21' 53" W, 170.00 feet, on the easterly line of Lot 23 of: said Part one MacBride Addition; Thence S 31.0 07' 51" W, 20.06 feet; Thence Southwesterly 75.79 feet on a 50.00 fool radius curve concave Southeasterly (the _ center of which is Lite center of the Calvin Court cul- de-sac in said addition); Thence N 89" 08' 52" W, 115.00 ---. - -feet; Thence northwesterly 23.56 feet on a 15.00 foot radius curve concave Northeasterly; Thence N 00 51' 08" E, 389.10 feet, all of said dimensions being measured on the Easterly, Southerly, and Westerly Boundaries of said Lot 23; Thence S 89` 56' 42" E, 202.87 feet to the easterly Line of said Lot 23; Thence S 0° 21' 53" W, 200.00 - - - - feet to the point of beginning. Said tract containing 1.867 acres. '.. WHEREAS, the Planning Division and the Engineering Division have examined the proposed plans and have made recommendations as to the same; and, WHEiLAS, said plans have been examined by_the Planning and Zoning - - Commission of Iowa City, and after due deliberation, said Commission has recommended that said large scale residential development plans and preliminary planned area devel-opment plan be acceptedandapproved; and, l.7/G.1. Res. No. 76-365 -2- WHEREAS, said plans are foundtoconform with .the requirements. - OF the City Ordinances of the City of. Iowa City, Iowa, with respect - to theestablishment of large scale residential development and planned area developments; - -- --; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF IOWA CITY, IOWA: 1. That said plans of the above-described premises, a part. of the Replat of Lot 23, Part -I MacBride Addition, an Addition to the City of Iowa City, Iowa, he and the same is hereby approved by -- the City Council. of -Iowa City, Iowa. _ 2. That said plans shall conform with all requirements of the large scale residential development ordinance and planned area develop- ment ordinance of the City of Iowa City, Iowa. - 3. That the City Clerk of the City of Iowa City, Iowa, is hereby authorized and directed to certify a copy of this resolution and of the final plans to the Office of the County Recorder of Johnson County, Iowa, after final passage and approval as authorized by law. October - Passed this 5th day of _ 1976. City of,Iof4a City, Iowa Mayor ATTEST: Abbie SCol.fus Cit C erk - _ City of Iowa City, Iowa It was moved by Selzer and seconded by Balmer that the resolution as read be_adopted, and upon roll call, there were: AYES NAYS ABSENT Balmer X - deProsse x Foster x Neuhauser _c _.-. Perret. Selzer X Vevera _x_ and rezone the following described property from R1A to'R1B, to -wit: Commencing at the Southeast corner of Sectiori;-12,, .; 779N,'R6W of, the 5th P.M.; thence N0',02'19"E; 109.3:25 ri =feet o'the east `line of said Section'12,.to--the point of beginning;, thence N89057141"W, 422.80:feet, _;;thence northwesterly, 163.02 feet on a'_436.18'foot radius_ , curve concave; northeasterly, to the 'northeast corner. 'of lot 66 in courtHillScott Boulevard Addition Part 3,'s, -an addition to -the City of Iowa;,City,.ylowa;_thenc.- 2102713011E, 66.06,f eet on the eastaine of said Part 3; thence northwesterly,'145.39'feet on'a 370:18 foot radius curve boncavP-.nn, tho��,'er,.: �� STAFF REPORT Planning P, Zoning Commission:- August 19,;1976 SUBJECT: Z-7611. Application submitted by Heritage ` systems to rezone a tract of land'south 'of Benton Street across from the Seville apartments from an R3A Zone to a PC Zone for the development of a neighborhood convenience center; date filed:7/26/76; 45 -day limitation: 9/9/76. STAFF According to Section 8.10.17.1C of the ANALYSIS: Zoning Code, '!before the rezoning of any° tract to Planned Commercial district zoning will be -considered by the; Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council, the owner or owners shall submit '(1) the economic feasibility of a planned to the City a report concerning commercial district at the location of their _tract, ;(2) the :effect of such a, planned commercial district on the -surrounding property, and (3) the impact of traffic generated by such a planned commercial district on the surrounding streets." The following analysis is presented to, assist the, Commission in making`s determination of the acceptability of a PC Zone at the above location on;the.basis of the abovementioned concerns. The concept:of,a neighborhood convenience center is perhaps, more misconstrued in its eighborhood'or to the effect upon,a community as a application to a n whole than any; other type of facility. This is understandable since: there,` are_not any commercial centers within the City which incorporate all of the c'of a neighborhood -convenience center. The necessary elements characteristi Towncrest centers, the Court Street and Scott; Boulevard areas zon11 ed.C2, and: the Mormon Trek Boulevard and Benton Street areas zoned CH or Ci with enough land area for commercial development_comparable to a`Sycamore Mall with probably as many: diversified uses, are not perceived to be (and probably weren't to objectionable neighbors) as neighborhood_ convenience centers. h Neighborhood convenience centers should be ,likened to passive and active neighborhood recreational areas, elementary, schools, andother facilities , which:provide a convenient and essential service to the neighborhood and not to the community as a whole. Attached as a`supplement to this analysis are excerpts from various sources setting.forth.the planning and -design, criteria essential for the development - of neighborhood convenience centers. '. The proposed neighborhood convenience center would -_be located in the approximate center of a neighborhood generally described by the boundaries Melrose Avenue on the north, Riverside :Drive 'on the cast, Highway 1 on the south and Sunset Street on the west." The economic analysis and feasibility, study presented with the application illustrates a'trade area encompassing:: all of the neighborhood and westerly beyond Mormon Trek -Boulevard.:'; Because the lack of competition in West Iowa City, with the exception of the Wardway,Plaza and the business development _in Coralville and along Riverside Drive, the neighborhood convenience center would `be expected to flourish. Support from this trade area will diminish, however, to,.the -2 - approximate area of the neighborhood itself if ',and when a shopping center is developed at Mormon -Trek _Boulevard and Benton Street. 'Ihe.obvious . concern to the developer and equally so of the City is whether there: ultimately will --be,enough support, from within the neighborhood to sustain the neighborhood convenience center.; According to an unpublished study by the staff; the estimated holding capacity or population at saturation within the neighborhood will.be approximately 6,000 people. _ According to design criteria, a' -shopping "center of the magnitude proposed should be supported by a population of from 1,000 to 2,000 persons. Thus,.it would seem, there will be more - than adequate support augmented by the high density of residential development` within the immediate vicinity. Located adjacent to the tract are apartment complexes to the west, across the street to the north, and combined with offices to the east and undeveloped land to the south. It would be difficult ;to find -a better location for a.shopping,facility which would supply the essential day-to- day items required by the residents in the immediate area. As a convenience to the residents, the neighborhood convenience center would,_ provide `an amenity acceptable to ;apartment living.' And contingentupon develop- ment of the neighborhood convenience center and the construction or installation of appropriate' materials to buffer the adverse effects upon : adjacent residential uses, there would appear to be no deleterious effect upon adjoining property. The staff would agree with the marketing consultant's comments relative to the traffic volume on.Benton Street (see page seven of the market study). Theoretically, if the neighborhood convenience center consists of stores which cater only -•to-the -neighborhood,'then it can be assumed that residents will not be travelling via Benton Street to destinations beyond the'neigh- borhood for essential items, and many will find it more convenient to walk ' to the center. Basic tothisassumption,. in part, is the 'development of the shopping center at Benton Street and Mormon Trek Boulevard. `Otherwise, residents beyond the neighborhood to the west who frequentthebusinesses in Coralville, might find it more convenient to shop -at the proposed con- venience center.— Nevertheless, it does not appear that the "traffic volume.- ' would increase appreciably. While the tract would appear to be a most desirable location for a neigh- borhoodreonvenience center, there is: one major constraint. "Best locations will normally.be found on major streets and preferably at or near the intersection' of- main :or- secondary -thoroughfares" .. --s0 it. --says in the attached literature on the design criteria.for neighborhood convenience centers. That's arguable considering the hazards of traffic -movements near a: major intersection and the exposure of'a shopping center to possible residential development at the other,three_corners of the' intersection. But, there is one advantage --pedestrians en route to the center can safely cross a street at the intersection. _ Here, it seems, is again the old nemesis of a heavily, traveled street which bisects:the neighborhood making it difficult to traverse from one part of the neighborhood.to the other. For this reason, the staff would propose as a policy that every attempt; be made to deemphasize Benton --Street `as a major arterial street. This can be accomplished byseveral methods: 1. By encouraging the use of other east -west thoroughfares such as: Highway l and Melrose Avenue. This :would entail;: the extention'of Sunset Street southward to Highway 1, the construction of an east - west collector street from Mormon Trek Boulevard to Sunset Street north of the City's South corporate line,, the widening.of Melrose -_ Avenue to accommodate four -full lanes of traffic, signalization to facilitate better access onto and movement along Melrose Avenue and Highway 1 and by the avoidance of direct travel''patterns'to Benton Street in future developments. 2. By terminating Benton Street at Mormon Trek-Boulevard.and establishing Rohret Road as a -major arterial street. 3. By impeding the flow of traffic on Benton Street to make it less convenient for cross-town travel. 4. By prohibiting any further high density residential development: along Benton Street. - - A reduction in the volume of traffic on Benton Street would certainly not eliminate the constraint above indicated but it might,' at least,.be ameliorated to a tolerable level. Regardless, the.City must weigh the acceptability"of:the proposed' neighborhood convenience center in view of this constraint. If found acceptable, a solution might be the installation of a'pedestrian cross fight at a location to facilitate crossing Banton Street to the neighborhood convenience center and also to Roosevelt School'. - STAFF According to Section 8.10.17.1D of the RECOMMENDATION: Zoning Code,'"land zoned Planned -Commercial Zone shall `be'laid out.and developed'asla unit according to a plane conforming to requirements of the Large Scale Non -Residential Development Ordinance". While the rezoning of a tract to a PC Zone is not predicated upon the approval of: - an LSNRD plan, it is the staff's recommendation that the 'subject application` be approved simultaneously with the approval of the preliminary LSNRD plan ' submitted (see S-7622)`.` Q ,NEIGHBORHOOD 1J SHOPPING CENTER LOCATION AND SIZE Tributary Area• The small neighborhood they provide adequate drainage and permit. store floors to slope with, COn;:dered as a local convenience and service whichnmustdepa should be breaks at frequent intervals.:A sloping site may be adapted by using for-Its success on supplyingthe eve da needs of a limned residential construction in the building, ry y at ty Man authorities advocete that a small center be located on the.^ wtlhm a relatively small surrounding tributary trading area. ft is only population Y small center will draw asubstantial amount of trade from other areas, It should be side of the street. This will,i�sually depend on the gOtf ty rarely that the shopping habits, relation to the a type and size of the car borne in mind that unless there is a strong trend toward population growth wihi^ of adequate site area. xfed tributary area served, and he a the trade area, not every small center is a potential community center. Utilities. Availability of utilities at or Gose to the site is a o► OOOlfam ie withience has n the immwn that neiediate tributary^area1en ordef to have a i or i mf a^ improvements. Long runs to reach available utilityconnectrons s�hotiAd be On-site improvements are items installed at the developer s expense as p si success. With this population, a' suppo m center of 8-12 shops with a minimum overall building construction costs. Besides the utilities these include the n m m a of 4 acres can usually t>g supported under aver for interior circulation on the many drug store will be the main tenant and average average fbor area of the scaping' property, Parking areas, outside lighting, a tante will be 40,000 square feet, though the range average size. ^ge-may be over this figure for Support of the center must be gauged in terms of the avers b PUNNING THE SITE the families in the primary trade area; a low to medium incorr �� Power o1 Store Types. lire initial site for a small center should generaly not tori ea it twice his number f families. With a s r tenant t It require than four to five acres. Site depths of 400 feet are desirable in order to prow easily from a distance of one and a haft miles rrrradfet mapr tenant it will draw off-street parking and store"service.:This depth is, of course, not Competition.elatito The second factor to.consider is the bcatbn of a shopping center t here sites are in areas already subdivided.' The-developer with relation to both the existing aif nd probable future competition which may be always oh Possibility of expanding his, center at some future timer andu no�t< expected from other business districts. Well located shopping centers may, on the should reserve additional land for this purpose.which can be put to some average, be found at intervals of +/2 to 1 mile, depending upon the type of develop ary commercial use in the interim period, initial construction might cont ment in terms of families per acre ors mile and the range of income groups to be served. approximately 10 stores in the'lollowing order:= Itis not advisable to generalize too broad y P 1. Supermarket any given center, as local factors will be rdetermining he tribute 2. Drug Stored with some eating facilities. " ry area e. 3. Cleaner and Dyer Shop, which could be combined with a laundry however that one strop determining. The point should be made, 4. _Beauty Parlor, g center with its own tributary area is always better ifien two weak ones with substantially overlapping areas. Where there is existing tom- S. Billie Station. Petr or Potentially favorable locations for shopping centers within distances y sub ially less than those mentioned, the developer Bakery (this might depend on provision by grocery), pecshouid consider his T Shoe Repair, Project with extreme care. 8. Laundry Agency (possibly in rear of another store). - Access Streets. The third factor from the location standpoint is the relation of the 9 Variety Shop, street system to the contemplated shopping center. Best locations will normal be 10. Barber Shop. found on major streets and prefers h' Variations from his basic list, of course found depending secondary thoroughfares. The specific l at or the intersections of main or g n.rt pacific location should also be situated so that it is vidual case. For instance, in an area of small apartments; a restaurant m Centers accessible from its tributary area, both b desirable among the first ten tanantsi The drug store Arid supermarket Centers which have been located off the main by andwitvehicuaccesslar r them Pennarket fc only over minor residential streets off t e'seldom proved successful. If ssibte, bests for any center, however, and no center can be considered complete; them. choo6 stores in se'a site `where the street system within the tributa sho Store Grouping.The more or less directionally toward the sho �' pPing area feeds importance wicis involved n the larger center Howcentethe es. not assui of tF developed, the access street system can shopping course, be designed with h this a eme being.store and supermarket will tend to anchor the group, The drug store shoof It in mind. have the, prime location, preferably the comer store-,: if the develop is Topography. The fourth factor is topography: q shopping center site ordinarily In1ersection of two streets. The other end of the group should normally be oil should be relatively level with grades not exceeding 2% to.3, percent—flatter If by the supermarket. The smaller shops located' between have the benefit Possible. Greater grades create a resistance to local shoppers as well as to pass. - pedestrian traffic generated between the two.,lf_the centergrowa,the rel Ing street traffic. Grades at store frontsof not over t to 1 Ya percent are ideal In that P one or more tenants will probably become desirable:' , - _ SOORCC: rl n B.Ilden Mulwl for lard "Demb- Pm nri2nd EdIff d. Nml,.., r.......�,J LUt;A11VI4 I LL Crude Standards for Estimating Space Requirements — — —•—•— --._J of Neighborhood and Community Shopping Centers Selected Neighborhood Populalon Acres of Combined Community -'Ng ';, —• `v i _� Sizes in Residential Communities of hood Shopping Area Pert 000 t?oj 30.50,000 at Various Parking Ratiosr. 2:1 3.1 i 5,000 0.7 0.9 2,500 0.6 1.0 1,000 1.1 1.5 m....:... .. . • a % —ai _ -. _ _ i (A parking ratio is the amount of square feet of parking space for every square loot or on I gyred by atom buildings.) Commercial land uses are usually broken down into three general t purposes of estimating space needs—the central, business distnct the: -I------j '1►ti shopping center, the neighborhood, or highway•service centers Eshml -- ---- - based on population figures and business activity—that is the rnark et to ��c J I projected. The chief measurement of use in relation tort space is In re - to parking and parking ratios. In most widespread current use are standards which relate to sub The location of the neighborhood shopping canter is generally located on neighborhood commercial space, most often used irl donnection with'i the arterial street at the intersection of a collector street. Adequate parking - velopment. in relationship to number of stores must be provided. The houses adjacent to the stopping center must be properly protected with planting or fences. _ N—ay rl lf..v ri..w At~,. N'ukwrreti D C. - SOURCE: Whr" nnr ro BWW rerh.k.1 BJ1mn ,11 B. .1 L.W Masan m t).p, oyrM lirrnnr. N a,h PLANNING THE NEIGHBORHOO cj :,call game room, including equipment for in- cal conditions.; The flexibility with which facilitin t .+ door games such as ping -gong, -chess, checkers,... may, be provided by separate community centers or card games, etc. existing and new schools or churches makes it difii d) reading and exhibit roomer cult to recommend fixed area allowances for such It• c) kitchen for preparation of refreshments and for varied indoor recreational uses. Mcooking classes CHURCHES workshop for classes in arts and crafts, particu- laxly in connection with household furnishings Neighborhoodchurches may play an important g) office and storage space for organizations partici- role not only in the religious, but also inahc social and " pating in activities cultural life ofa community, serving in part as recrea and educational centers." Although specific Mantoos oe PRovmtt+o FACILITIES plans plans for churches in development areas usually. can. ;i Requirements listed above may be met by a sopa- not be made before the community is occupied; itis rate community building for each neighborhood, in important that space be set aside for the'later building,' new or existing buildings such as churches, YMCA's, of churches. Because of the variations in religious in=: i• etc., or by,the elementary school if permitted by its terests of various population groups,, it may be un design and operation. : possible to predict the numbers and types of churches Use of the school building assures the economy of that may spring up in a new community. However, multiple use. Provision of a separate community build- religious authorities consider it reasonable to plan up Ing give greater flexibility and makes it easier for to one church for every 700 families. A plot of not less- arorganizations organizationswith daytime activities to operate with- than Y4 acre in area should be reserved for, each'. out interference. Ile choice will depend on the follow- church building." The local (city or county) council. in g local conditions:, of churches may; be of assistance in deciding prob tt a) whether school authorities are able and willing facilities necessary for )ems of church location. Where neighborhoods are composed of very di.--`jfi S to provide the additional versified religious groups, churches; may often be f a community school and to permit the regular t grouped with other community facilities at the disinct . f use of parts of the school building at all times;: level, Such as, high schools _and civic centers, as the 7 b) whether other appropriate buildings are avail- then serve a rather widely scattered, population In able to all residents; these cases location of the church on or neara primary 1 e) whether there are existing or potential organ- traffic artery is important, and land allocation fora (i izations within the community which signify churches should be considered a district ratherthan # their willingness and ability to operate in the a neighborhood problem. i community building and to pay. rent which will cover the construction and maintenance costs; Lt d) whether the financial structure of the proposed 23. NEIGHBORHOOD SHOPPING development make the construction and opera- tion of a community building practicable as a GENERAL REQUIREMENTS part of the development itself. Neighborhood shopping _facilities are considered to :• One means of avoiding duplication of facilities _ include only, those stores and service establishments .:; would be to combine theschooland asmall community which are used frequently by all families and which,":_ ' building into a single community center. School au- should be easily accessible to the home. dicoria, playrooms and classrooms can then be used, Shopping is normally the only neighborhood cons---. while office and storage space and special' facilities munity facilitywhich is not at least partly subsidized f such as a reading room, game room, kitchen and work- by a public or voluntary agency. The enterpriser in ;'r shop can be provided within the community building. this case'may be a chain store, a department store, an In this case, the nursery school and health center may individual shopkeeper or a cooperativc society. Such i well become a part of the community center. variants as these affect the planning procedures but Neighborhood area allowances for indoor social have no materialbiiect on space standards. The shop- f; and cultural facilities are given in Table 11 under ping center may be constructed by the developer or -' "acres in general community facilities." These area by the firma' that will operate the stores. The chief , J requirements should be considered as a general guide planning considerations are the need to include the ` only. The figura must be adjusted in each case to lo- proper types: of facilities and the need for enough con- ' trol over the physical plant to preserve the architec- ;..y ' nThe reading room can often be supplied with books and exhibit material by arrangement with the city library, mentum -aural and otheramenities oC the neighborhood. of - -': or other organizations. Many large cities have snobilc library - It Health department services, for instance, are often given :•; units manned by professional librarians, which can service this In church building*. ` -yy type of library station. Arrangemcnts for library service and recommendations as to the amount ofspaee and type of equip. from ' It Area requirements for churches and other indoor social and recreational facilities arc covered by"Ayes ingencralmmmuntry' - • - ment should be obtained the meal public library facilitin" in Table t t and relate tables of apter VI. PROVISIO•F .NEICHBORHO ie OD C "f s - Odf.L'N1%�FACILITIES Or _ 51 r; TYFE5 OF SERVICES AND FAcii;(rtes built upas more planned ncighllorhood shopping Rt I The types of goods required in the neighborhood asrto includinsarc being lnalt `77ro genual basis for 'dgmcnt s ch are determined by�`their importance to daily family life -The minimum %equirementt that t rota g given type of,commcrcia] facility should be is it useful to the majority,of the residents? and drug store be availablewithin the neighborhood can it be economicallysupportcd isthereanynuisanee is based on the fact that lack of food sho m facili- attached which would make it undesirable in a resi- PP g dcntial arca (as noise from a dance hall)?' ani especially perishables, may affect nutrition- and that lack of medicine and first-aid supplies maybe !1, fi - serious in an accident or acute illness. AREA REQUIREMENT] The following list of basic facilities which may b� Table 10 gives assumed sizes, for neighborhood 3o_included in the shopping centerofa residential mei b_ shopping centers for a range of neighborhood o u - t a PP B P p B lat]on, ranging from 0,8 acre to 3 acres. .These sizes boyhood is given as an illustration rather than a sec- are based on normal rnerehandizing practicefbr the tng commendation. It has been used as the basis foe s ace : rc - - 1°' allowances in Table 10. P types of indicated. Changes in store t }) m- of course require changes in area, in store o e t variation hes Food market (including specialty Moods such as in need for parking: The total space includes building bakery and delicatessen goods); coverage, service and customer parking -and u Drugstore (including reading matter, stationery, . pace, but do," not include s' circula- r' ' ] tobacco and vanity tion s y goods) Penal nc buffer strips which may be; needed for protection of nearby rest tch ' Barbershop, beauty parlor; laundry and dry clean- dentes, It is assumed that the site will be laid'out so tell 1°g Pickup service; shoe repair and shoeshine scrv- thatthae can be included in the neighborhood err bb- ice; auto service station, (including filling station, Otherwise; shopping center sizes should be mat k. minor repairs and auto accessories). ally increased. di- be In isolated developments,, a dry goods and hardware t t store, ]ending library LOCATION AND SITE REQUIREMENTS J , iet g ry and rotaurants may appropri. Locationofshoppingandothercommunityfacilities �y ately be included. The provision of sho m facilities L primarily an close together is generally desirable:; Under normal In shopping P y condition all shopping facilities in the neighborhood economic problem.: However, it has a bearing on should be combined in one location; `for the convcni_ ary amenity of the neighborhood, in that a sound eco 'for encs of the shopper. Furthermore, a shopping center, nomteapproachtnfhe choice ofstores and serviceawill unlike scattered stores, can effective] PP g un avoid an oversupply of small marginal stores which strips,' adequate parking and protection from future tend toward frequent change of ownership and in. y Provide buffer stability. P uncontrolled spread of commerce. The neighborhood shopping center should contain AicDt begweenn of tthe thhe ree Aping center should prevent con only the types and number of stores which can be well shoppers, types of circulation: pedestrian i - ppers, shoppers in automobiles and vehicles scry supported by the population.70 Support implies not..,icing the store. I to only that the stores can make a fair profit but that. Service areas should be designed in a manner which their volume of business will be large enough in rola- will avoid rat and insect breeding ch tion to overhead costs so that the residents of the neigh- rich borhood will obtain goods at average prices, g grounds. Impervt 8 ous,:easily-cleaned court-surfaces,and provisiodfor On this basis, the stores and services to be included sanitary outdoor storage of wastes are needed. t am- will be those for which the total sales volume required sho Enough Plantingping center shouldt bees providedearound the r in _jos ef8eient store operation will be equaled by the tures from noise, Io traffic hct nearby and glare. r /° estimated urchasin an P B Power and demand within the sash :_• neighborhood.n but A body of data on this subject is gradually being 24. HEALTH SERVICE FACILITIES : 1 '--a It should pe'noted that caimatn of mmtncrcW arse re - 19P t quirements based on the amount olcommerce In existing citta - - ror - unnotbetakena,aguidetotheamountthatshouldbesupplied Essential needs under this heading weresketched in him in new devebpmelts. Use of the tigwa for existing areas, in = Chapter I: convenient setas of residents to priJate i commerce will produce an oversupply -of sAapptna lacilitiu medical and dental service and to the -Mout inventories of witting comaternal land use d on- v!minate between neighborhood, district and city-widemiho� :, general hospital tee- Ping centers. :. _. _ p- Robert W. Dowlin �• Neighborhood Slapping Cc gg n7Ta purchasing power in the neighborhood depends on the Ar,A;I.,I d Parma, October, 1913 p .76-78.,nttn; • III " ppaattern of mnsumerupenditur,,and thetotalnumbe offaml_ CaU'er� Bauer and(yrencc St S lieswithin the community, The neighborhood demand, as Jami- Neighborhood Sho pin teen•"S tore Buildings and tvcn :entiatcJ trod purthuln ..eery 19N, P 8 Gersten•": Arrhiodu.d Rrtard, l�ebru- 8 Power alone,. will delwnd oo the a- DPP• 175-67. asci -mount ofcomlxtltion due to nearby shoppin6 areas; the unlit Gtotnmunfty BuBden'Council,"Sho in -' ,at and quantity of goods and s!". Providin a quality -torhood Neeesity,••. Urban La y, PP ng Neigh_ 11! 4 f 'the coovenierae of the location of the net bborhthe store and : Octolxr-November; 7911, September, 1 iter pp, 1. 3•1; center. _ 8 ood shopping Muctl .Villaneuva, Plavp. 1 �Nri A[ror .. : ii . l L Asad SM inL cervi' 1 ,•' - - (New York: National Committee on Homing, 1963), t PI THE 52 ANNING NGIGHBORH00D� facilities; and participation of the ncighborhood in the ping will be governed by the.official health dep.lrt. official and voluntary public health programs of the nlent. Technicalassistance may also be had from the locality. U. S. Public Health Service, which has prepared basic Availability. of a physician within or close to the plans for health centers that -can be adapted to the '! neighborhood is a minimum essential. Medical and needs of any, locality.to dental offices can usually be provided in buildings of -' - -, - c the neighborhood commercial center.' _ It will seldom be possible to provide new hospital 25. NEIGHBORHOOD COMMUNITY ti facilities for a single residential neighborhood, but in isolated locations thought should be given to emer- FACILITIES AS, A WHOLE gencyfacilities ih connection with a doctor's office. Local school health services will normally be ex- F tended to the neighborhood school, and needed u- GROUPING amination or office rooms should be included in its 'I'hefacilities should if possible be grouped together design, of course after consultation with local health - in the direction of the major traffic flow from thedc- authorities. Decentralization of other public. health velopmcnt area to the outside, accessible by direct TABLE 10.. NEIGHBORHOOD SHOPPING. COMB SI2J! ,i /onrmad component We, and Total Area, by ►opulatbn of Ndphborbood`. { - NEIOItaORHOOD. POPULATION ' !J tHOTPINO ANTER 1,000 putOOs...2,000 pcmm :'3,000 pt:rWDr 4,000 ptS m 5,0D0 pQaont - (� 275 famlliu 550 famllin - 825 families 1,100 familics 1,375 Gmilics _{ ti l7 COMPONENT Usu - -- A k '. 1) Ground ares of bldgr a sqft... •. 9,000 14,000 18,000 22,000 25,000 • DQ 2) Customer auto puking sq ft 16,000 28,0011 - 36,000 44,000 50,000 ' ft- - i (I 3) Gu service station: •q .—. — 24,000 24,000 .24,000 I 4) Circulation service and setback d _ - - /3 sq. ft.. ..... .....• ... 6,800 10,500 19,500 22,500 25,000 ` • 1 •�� TOTAL AasA ........... 33,800 52,500 - 97,500 - 112 500 124,000 _- _ _5) Squue feet .... , •'. ' 6) Aero... ......:.......... :.80 1.2 2.2 -. - -.26 -. 3.0 p 111 7) Aun per 1,000 persons ` .. .80 .60 .75 .65 .60 8) Square feet per family............ - 12S 95 120 - 100 -. 90 I1 _ • Cope fleet u.. ud vu acrd. via :..ff.,ad by ecvnomie rues. or retd<ou and local ora.rda.doe d stall .uvlm. •stere sad aervkea ...it to Ind,de food drag. bubo and beautl• rhop b. repair, laundry sod My deader fureber • pickup andon, u r ,I-• And 1. stat. Oneytory bulldiep aanrmadl gwnd uta equa4 told floor area. EquFdut flour ver In hIgber bulldtep would reduce land requireaxou 1 �,� for Wiliam tad Items H. - - - i - • hunt allvraeu b telae We Bace area d bttlldlnp, u ceammeaded by vadow •uWadtfa - - W `} aAl1o•rasa r. dreol.dw/r M.and.d,mkuea(ml.dudewa1U pludor•tripi, aerda earn and rrvtae parlde�L25 p. near or tend dltrm.. 1.2 and J. No.ae+a.<L made int far NnMmdd buSuaMp ben.cee.kopplai cennr Waal d.TUleg. I Lie la aaumed m lot put efalahb.hood park.. l h' programs may give an opportunity to develop a sat- pedestrian and automobile routes. Such, grouping will ;? ellite health center in the neighborhood -perhaps in encourage the use of all facilities. a structure provided by the city, perhaps using space The existence of a physical center of the neighbor I' in the community'center, school -or -an apartment hood Stimulates the growth of community relation building. Services have thus been extended in many ships and the acceptance of community responsibilities i•;1 cities in conjunction with public : housing projects. by the residents.'.. Among the health activities which may be carried on AE most community facilities require comparatively in such facilities, supplementing those of private prat- flat land, tbpography will; to some extent, govern ' titioners, are the following: their grouping and location._ Special situations, may t [: !! occur in which such grouping will not be advisable, Antcparttun and postpartum maternity clinic especially where existing facilities must be taken into Infant health services account. Communicable disease clinic and registration " Within the group, the various community facilities - -. - .. Ps office should be physically. separated from each other to pre - 1 Inoculation service - --It 1.' vent conflict of circulation. is especially important ' Tuberculosis clinic Dental clinic that pedestrian' access to the school be separate from all vehicular access to other facilities. Nutrition education t k 1 ,-• Visiting nurse service -.- - '"public Hraltb Ccnterer" Architectural Retard, July, 1942, r. Where a health center is to be developed, its plan- pp. 63.78. p - SEP2 41976 D A L3U.I.E Si.OLFUS' . C�E tt K September 23, 1976 Honorable Mayor and City Council of Iowa Cit 'the City of Y> Iowa, Johnson County D ' Re ,Objection to .rezonin v g of tract of land,_'Oh t •- on West .Benton Street Audubon' Dale D. Levis and Hertha ,,..c of;tr '`IOwa 50025,-hereb Levis, 1114 Ridgeway. Drive, act of -land on Wes t BentoneStreeteniobjection. t and 'state `to•:the rezoning _That-wesare astfollows , located the owners of the f on West Benton Street ollowing described real Iowa CitY> Iowa estate rgctract -cr > described a °f land in -"- s follows: thA. Northwest t:'. Sixteen (16), Townshi Quarter (NWS) of (6) West of the P Seventy-nine (79) North Sectio One-half Fifth P.M.,described Range Six (W ) of equal width as follows: "West real estate: Commencing at of _the followin Benton Street a point in g described West > in Iowa the center line of line of said City, Iowa, 1536.4 feet on a line with Section Sixteen,_(16j East of the as to the an ?xisting old �'-said;polnt bean west boundar fence the"South established zt herein by agreement,.datednJuly,Zof 3he;real;estate described 1, 1960, in Book 234 - > 1960; and'<recorded Of Johnson Page 583,.-`in"�the.offandice -Z August 346. County, Iowa, thence South--°f�ihe,Recogust 4 feet to the Southline`of the along said fence Of said Section Sixteen Northwest line: minutes East along (16), the South Quarter.,(NWy) 379,4 t said south line B9 'degrees 45 thence North south 10 of; Northwest Q line of Benton. Street minutes`East'to Quarter -West 380.4 feet , thence North 89 de the"center Point of beginninlong center line of BentoneStreetMinutes Minutes - thereof g> except the East 30 feet of e subject to the Street and easements rights of the - equal width Of record. Public in said Benton That the said real estate - housing and has is zoned residential 4O apartments knownaPartment building on for for multiple as Hillsboro Apartments 1015 Wes consisting of, Vera Ruth West Benton Street. and has Lindholm owner of the East half an apartment building on her of the.above- buildings have always, been mana half of tract said tract. managed as one apartment Complex 41 - �- .� - iY 4 _ � �_ L 'J � � � (�y I � '. i _ �3 � 1 � n � �s i tt ;'' `i - _ �.: �.. >_ - �;. ;. - - - ,_ _ ,� ♦/ � �_ 5,�; � _a�, �. ." �_ o �^ ` Z i T �. �. fir __ _ �k'.r..-_.:- ` E" � � s Y O i -� �` 41 T � ,;. _ . .- Z �'� ..� -. �. _ -. ;_ .. ,: r .. , ., �.;� ; .r_ _.. �. �..; SEP 2 41976 D ABBIE S OLFUS CITY CLERK September 23, 1976 Honorable Mayor and City Council of the City ofIowaCity, Iowa,;Johnson County Re: Objection to rezoning of tract of land on West `Benton `Street We, Dale D. Levis and Hertha Levis, 1114 Ridgeway Drive, Audubon, Iowa 50025, hereby make written objection to the rezoning of tract of land on West Benton Street and state as follows: That we are the owners of the following described real estate located on West Benton Street, Iowa City, Iowa, described as follows: A tract of land in the Northwest Quarter (NW34) of Section Sixteen (16), Township Seventy-nine (79) North, Range Six (6) West of the Fifth P.M. described as follows:. West One-half (W32) of equal width of the following described real estate: Commencing at a point .in the center line of Benton Street, in Iowa City, Iowa, 1536.4 feet East, of the. West line of said Section Sixteen (16), said point being on -a line withanexisting old fence the ,South established as to the west boundary line of the real estate described herein by agreement, dated July 30, 1960, and. recorded August 1, 1960, in Book 234, page 583, in the office of the Recorder of Johnson County, Iowa, thence South along said fence line 346.4 feet to the Southline of the Northwest Quarter (NW14) of said Section Sixteen (16), thence South 89 degrees 45 minutes East along said south line of said Northwest. Quarter 379.4, thence North 0 degrees 10minutesEast to the center' line of Benton Street, thence North 89 degrees 26 minutes West 380.4 .feet along center line of Benton Street ;to the point of beginning, except the East, -30 feet of equal width ; thereof, subject to the rights of the public in said Benton Street and easements of record. That the said real estate is zoned residential' for multiple housing and has an apartment building on said tract consisting of 40 apartments known as Hillsboro Apartments 1015 West Benton Street. Vera Ruth Lindholm owner of the East half of the above tract and has an apartment building on her -half of said tract.. Both . buildings have always been managed as one apartment complex.. The tract lying immediately East of and adjacent to the tract owned by Vera Ruth Lindholm is presently zoned residential for multiple housing and a request is presently before the City Council to rezone said tract for commercial use. -- At=a-hearing before the City of Iowa City ZongingCommission the Zoning Commissionvotedfor rezoning said tract commercial subject to specific planned use of said tract: - for -a shopping center. We as owners of the above tract respectfully object to the proposed rezoning and, allege that said proposed use would greatly increase the already congested traffic flow. That it would increase parking problems in -the area. That it would be hazardous to children walking to and from the school near by. That the only access to said proposed shopping center is west Benton Street and there is a serious lack of any streets running _ - North and South for several blocks to the west of said tract to or the East of said tract. - - -' We therefor respectfully request that the City Council deny the request for said rezoning. Dale D Levis ! ' Hertha Levis 1114 Ridgway Drive Audubon, Iowa 50025 F1 J'P124 O 1976 AUDIE S f OLFUS CFTY CLERK 1 P2 71976 D AB31E STOLFUS CITY CLERK September 23, 1976 Honorable Mayor and City Council of the City of Iowa City, Johnson County, Iowa Re: .Objection to rezoning of tract of - land on West Benton Street hereby Vera Ruth Lindholm y make written , 221 3rd Avenue, Audubon, Iowa 50C25, West Benton objection to the rezoning of of land Street and state as follows: That I west am the owner Of the following described real estate` located on Benton Street, Iowa City, Iowa, described as follows: A tract of land in the Northwest Quarter (NWk) of Section Sixteen (16), Township Seventy-nine (79) North (6) West of the Fifth P.M, described as One-half , Range Six - realOne- estate) of equal width of follows: East Commencingthe following described Benton Street at a Point in the Center` West line ' in Iowa, City; Iowa, 1536.4 feet line of of said Section Sixteen (16):, said East Of the as a line with an existing old fence to Point being as to the west boundar the South established herein b y line of the real estate described by.agreement, dated Jul 3b, 1960, and recorded 1, 1960) in Book y Of Johnson Count 234' page:583, in the office of August 346.4 feet to y, Iowa, thence South alongthe Recorder the Southline'Of the NorthwestsQuarterce line Of said Section Sixteen (16),.thence South 89; degreesr45 - minutes East along(NWS) 379 4 said south line of said Northwest thence North 0 degrees 10 minutes East to Quarter line Of Benton Street, thence North 89 degrees 26minutes West 380.4 feet along center line of Benton Street to the Point of beginning, except the East 30 feet of equal width thereof, subject-to the rights of the public in said Benton Street and easements of record. That the said real estate is zoned residential for multiple`` housing and has an apartme;,t building on said tract consisting o= 30 apartments known as Hillsboro Apartments 905 West Benton-Stree� -- That the tract lying immediately to the east the above described tract is Presently ti le and adjacent to P housing, and a re Y zoned residential for mul- to rezone said tract commercials been made to the Zoning Commission -2-. - residential (R3A) to commercial (PC) andby -the absence of any thoroughgoing consideration ofpossible adversa impact on interests that have relied .on the present zoning.The one clear change since the zoning plan's adoption is the fact that particular commercial interests have come forward to advocate a -plan that they believe will return a substantial profit to them. Possibly in addition, the Zoning and Planning Commission is attracted by_a new concept_of mini -shopping centers that would dot the landscape of residential areas throughout Iowa City. It is important to stress that this new concept, if it does explain the Commission's decision, has never been adopted by the city nor incorporated as a general concept into the city's plan. Nothing is more inconsistent with the idea of a comprehensive plan, nor more disillusioning to property owners, than an isolated application of an idea not accepted as an operating principle for all. Apart from these two possible explanations for considering the proposed zoning change, a study of the actual development of the area around Heritage Square reveals exactly the type of single and multifamily residential use that the comprehensive zoning plan authorizes and evidently contemplated. Of course, there are now more people in the area -- and will be still more -- than were there when the plan was adopted. But the plan anticipated those people, and specifically anticipated the population. density within thoseareasnow zoned- R3A and R3B. To the extent that the proposal is justified by the interests of certain residents-- for example, those who live in the Seville Apartments those interests have.not.arisensubsequentto -the adoption ofthe comprehensive plan. Certainly the physical characteristics of which the developer_ makes such an exaggerated point-- the hardship of the Benton Street and Grand Avenue hills and crossing Riverside Drive -- have not appeared since the planners and the city - officials developed and approved the.existing plan. In fact, on one point claimed to be so crucial, the economic viability of a commerical development in a residential area, the case is weaker for been at the time the proposal than it would have of the comprehensive ' more, not f Plan's adoption;becau ewer, shopping sit ernativ there are es'in the area and now now bus service that did ' in addition not exist at all + there is Z a short time ago). The City of Iowa Cit the "Zoning Code") provides Y, Iowa, Zoning Chapter (hereinafter referred to a in Section 8.10,17_1 that s zoning is conditional u consideratio Pon the proponent' n of PC the economic f s submitting "a re feasibility of a Port. concernin Of such a Planned commercial d g (.1 Planned commercialistricc. _ district '-(2) the effect impact of traffic °n the surrounding property, generated by such a and (3) the surroundingPlanned commercia streets." T district on the This Provision evidently stance, not merely- Y imposes ;of Form. The a requirement of sub - Possibly among others __ are requirement means that these three factors central to any decision rezoning from residential to concernin commercial, g the proposed Of the required re Accordingly the substance port are matters of ver and details Zoning Code - Y great importance. seems to assume that Furthe I rmore; the be carefully examined and concernin anal g these three factors making Yzed by the Planningwill. g its recommendation and Zoning Comm and by the Cit fission in Yet the record Y Council in making its decision• reveals that that the applicant's report is the report barely superficial Y mentions two and self-serving, recommendation ac °f the three factors, and that the Commission assertions in the generalities of the + it is necessaryReport. To ex to look in some explore -these action of the Commission a detail at the and the application and at the Commission's staff. 3• The application of the rezoning proponent, heavily on an independentP nent, Heritage S consultant' Ystems, depends requirements s study and report to concerning the three satisfy the specified legal concentrates almost entirely ,on ,the p areas. But the consultant's study first area -- economic feasibility;; The consultant's report apparently attempts to show economic feasibility, in three separate ways. (1) It portrays in general terms the hardship to the people' of the area by reason of existing shopping sources. (2) It- purports 'to show, through survey results of a-poll of 100 persons, that there is a felt need fore, a shopping center at the proposed location. (3) It claims, through survey results and argumentation, that the proposed site "should be'viable" as a neighborhood convenience shopping center location. Before we proceed to a more careful examination of each of these three approaches, it should be noted that only the last of the three comes close to being directly responsive to the law's requirement of a reportconcerning"economic feasibility," and this last approach relies on very debatable inferences. (1) Perhaps the kindest thing ,to say about the report's pretentious language concerning the hardship of the residents is that it doesn't hurt much even if it is not to be 'taken seriously. still, the 'fact that the report tries so hard may reveal something about the basic weakness of the proposal. As one reads about our hardship in getting up Benton Hill, of our making our way across not only Riverside Drive but the river as well:, of our having to make an "entry" into downtown Iowa City, of our battling our way to the Coralville strip, of our somehow mastering the "complex procedures" necessary to "traverse".the "psychological insulator" to our north, one feels that this must be a-struggle comparable to what our intrepid ancestors endured in crossing the mountains and plains to settle the West. Plainly, Lf these; overdrawn difficulties.---real.' enough on their own-minute scale -- have any bearing, on the question of rezoning, citizen reliance on an existing zoning plan is virtually impossible. (2), Let us turn now to the poll results indicating.that area residents have a felt need for the proposed commercial venture in their midst. At first glance, this survey looks impressive. But a more careful appraisal leaves quite a different impression. By way of preface, we may note and put to one side. ' a -5- (i) the fact that we are not -,:here talking about a petition or petitions by named residents of the area; (ii) the fact that we know little about the adequacy.of the methodology of the questionnaire or survey or the sample polled•, (iii) the well-known fact that one can get many different and seemingly inconsistent answers to polls, that different polls on the same subject are often inconsistent,: that poll results often shift abruptlywithin a short period of time, that the answers people give to questions vary substantially, with the identity and manner of the interrogator and the sequence and form of the questions put. In addition, we can note and put aside the apparent fact that the Commission neither made,an independent survey nor examined closely the methodology or reliability of the survey submitted. Let us now assume, for argument's sake, that the poll accuratel y reflects.what it purports to represent.` What does it show?' It shows that a majority of those 100 respondents asked whether they thought they needed a "convenience" center nearer than Coralville, Wardway, downtown Iowa City, or the Mall said yes. It seems extremely doubtful that these respondents were saying more than that it would be quite nice to have a place where one could more easily buy a loaf of bread. Who can disagree with that? - If one focuses totally on the convenience if one ignores costs, 3f one does not consider the intensity of "need," if one does not decide how frequently the "need" arises -- if one simplifies the question sufficiently, in other words, there may appear to be a need. If a grocery._store is placed in the proposed area,.many of the residents will on some occasions take advantage of that location to buy'a loaf of bread -- as they would if there were another store half again as close or another half as close as that. But surely the "need" that would thus be satisfied is not a verypressing one. Surely,'._ a sophisticated survey is not needed to discover it: Surely, it does not match the rhetoric of the report that makes a trip across the Liver "something;aof a -6 - venture" and refers to residents of the area who have "coped" with their "isolation." Our pioneering ancestors would not laugh at such a notion of "need"; they would be dumbfounded. Furthermore, the survey does not at all explain how there can possibly be a perceived "need" even by this diluted standard for the residents, in well over half of the area, who live closer to the Wardway shopping -center or to the smaller centers around the Quick Trip and Fairchild's than to the area proposed for commercial development. In fact, when they were questioned about where they would go for certain items if the Heritage Square center were inthe- proposed location and those items were "needed""at this moment," the;?respondents' answers leave serious doubt about the existing felt need. For example, only 53% said they would go to Heritage Square for bread, milk, or potato chips; only 47% for prescription drugs. - - Finally, even if one takes at face value the report's suggestion that some group of area residents feel a'need for some of the proposed commercial outlets, whatsignificanceshould one attach to this?Nothing in the law indicates that the zoning plan may be changed simply because some group of residents are willing to say that they feel a need for the change. There are tacit suggestions in the developer's application and the Staff Report that Heritage Square will add an "amenity," as a sort of fringe benefit, to the apartment residents in the area. But the comprehensive plan expressly excluded that idea and nothing in the law gives apartment owners or tenants the power to increase the value of their property, interest at their own discretion. At most, the expression of need is relevant to the consideration of 'economic feasibility, and economic feasibility.must be evaluated more closely and must be evaluated along with the effect on surrounding property and the impact on traffic. (3) When one -turns directly to the question of economic feasibility, however, the report is incredibly weak. The area that the developer says:wi11 -8 • of the respondents indicated they would not use the new location, -and -for still - others (beauty and barbershops),, a majority would not say that they would try the new location even once. The Staff Report states that the neighborhood convenience center would be expected to flourish because of "the absence of competition in West Iowa City, with the exception of Wardwav Plaza and the business develop ment,in.Coralville and along RiversideDrive. " (Emphasis added.) And, one should add, with the exception of Fairchild's, Dane's throughout much of the year, and (in case Riverside Drive is construed too narrowly) the Quick Trip and the A -One Barbershop.* One might ask whether it is appropriate to place a shopping center that lacks competition in an advantageous position with respect to certain isolated residents without any assurance that quality will be high and prices competitive. But the central question is, why are .the excepted areas excepted? Plainly, they will provide competition, as will at least some other areas such as downtown Iowa City and the Sycamore Plaza So also would the proposed shopping center at Mormon Trek and Benton, as the Staff Report recognizes. No one explains why residents in the area will shop at the new shopping center rather than other existing alternatives. For example, the developer's report does not explain what will lead persons in the greater (or smaller) area `to go farther to shop at Heritage Square than to alternatives that will in many cases be closer. The report quotes one respondent as saying that downtown Iowa City, is a "helluva long way to go for a package of nails." But most residents.will realize that both Ward's and Ken's would be alternative sources of hardware and that the total% = selection available in these stores is more extensive than anything likely, .to be provided in the proposed shopping area. Nothing in the record takes note of -the fact that there are vacant store locations in the Wardway shopping .center. Nor is any attention given to a point stressed in the supplement to the Staff Report, that a supermarket will draw easily from a distance of one and one-half miles and ;that one strong center is better than two weak ones. * Also, Ken's and other stores on Route 1 but not in the Ward be added. way Plaza should -9- Furthermore, the responses to several questions indicate that the residents of the area do not use distance as a determinative factor in deciding shopping preferences. For milk, bread, potato chips (needed "at this moment" -- and with no Heritage Square available), 222 of the respondents would go to Eagles (at Wardway) and 15% to Quick Trip and 10% to both Dane's and Fairchild's, but 19% would go to the Coralville Randalls, 17% to the Kirkwood Avenue Hy-Vee, and 9% to the Coralville Hy-Vee. Other similar questions evoked si For prescriptimilar responses. on drugs,, 27% go to May's and 19% to Boerner's, but 21% go to Coralville Drug Fair, 19% to Osco's, ll% to Walgreen s, 8% to Pearson's, 8% to Drug Fair downtown, and 3% to Mott's. For hardware, 10% go to Ken's, but 33% to`Lenoch & Cilek's in Coralville, 17% to Lenoch & Cilek's downtown. This ` pattern seems to hold for all of the types_of goods and services included in the report. It provides no basis for a conclusion that proximity is the factor ' that dictates where people shop -- even for "convenience" items. It-is a pattern that raises a very sober question about any decision concerning economic feasibility that is premised on the proposed location and an assumption about lack of competition. It. seems clear that the proposed shopping centerwill"flourish"-if and only if it is able tocompeteeffectively and that whether it is able to do so`will depend on a number of variables, many quite inscrutable, but at least including prices, quality, and whatever location advantage exists in fact. And it is clear that nothing in the record does much about supplying these variables. When the report is put in context, then, it may show that`s majority .of respondents would like to be able to run across the street for-:.a loaf of bread, but there is not the slightest suggestion on the developer's part that these occasional purchases by persons living close to the proposed area would make it economically feasible. The case for economic feasibility simply has, made. 'made. been -, =10_ It may be suggested that the economic feasibility of the proposal is the developer's problem. ,Plainly, though, those who adopted the Iowa City Zoning Code thought otherwise. And it is not hard to see why. As the Staff Report's.. -supplement points out, "small marginal stores, which tend toward frequent ip and instability;" are to be avoided. It would be.bad enough change of ownersh to pay the price of a commercial development in a residential area that gave something back to the residents in return but much worse to pay that price and - end up ,with nothing or worse than nothing. 4. The application is sparse indeed when it comes to the traffic impact. To.begin with, the applicant's consultant expressly disclaims having made any, formal traffic study but offers, instead, some "observe tions".ofThe application itself merely states its "opinion" that any traffic increase will be<negligible and adds the possibility that the center may reduce use of cars and buses for those within walking distance.Unless the Zoning Code is read to require only meaningless form rather than a substantial basis for decision, it would seem that casual observation and off -hand opinion fail, �.asl'a:matterlofzlaw,. tb-`comply , with the Zoning, Code. AlthoughtheStaff Report said it agreed with the consul- tant's traffic conclusions, these observations are, nevertheless, unsubstantiated and unconvincing (and the Staff's agreement is apparently based on its assumption.-- not ssumption--not shared by the developer-- that Sunset will mark -the western boundary of, traffic moving to the center). The consultant suggests no impact on traffic because those buying at the stores would have driven bythelocation to purchase the goods elsewhere. But whether the traffic would otherwise drive by the Heritage Square location would depend upon where the prospective purchaser lives and where that resident would otherwise buy (within or without the area). For example, few people living west or north of the proposed Benton Street location would drive-by that -location, to " shop on the Coralville Strip or at Fairchild's. Similarly, 'few.whoIlive�east=of that location would drive by it to shop at the Wardway Plaza. Many who live west of that location would go to Wardway;,the Sycamore Mall, or downtown .via Route`1 or Myrtle or r,rand Avenue without going by that location. At the public hearing before the Commission on September 2, 1976, the traffic:. problems were attempted to be minimized still further by picturing trading at the proposed location as involving mainly pickups on the way to and from work. .But commercial viability from such a clientele is not really claimed by the report, and it is simply ridiculous to suppose that the proposed beauty shop or hardware store will thrive if it must rely upon short sbops by the commuter traffic. In fact, it is plain that many of the proposed shops would draw from outside the area if they are commercially successful (and would not draw,much from anywhere if they are not successful commercial ventures). Even on the basis of the appli— cant's unwarranted assumptions, a significant traffic impact would result. Traffic moving into and out of the main street from both directions presents quite a different sort of congestion than would traffic that merely goes by., And thiscongestionfrom entering and exiting traffic would be particularly dangerous for young children -- especially so if the traffic is heavier on the way to work when children are going to school. What needs to be emphasized is not so much the absurdity of the claims of the developer about traffic impact but the fact that nothing better was offered. Perhaps the Commission demanded so little because it assumed that the proposed commercial rezoning would be no worse for traffic than apartment development for which the land is now zoned. If so, this is to substitute speculation and generality for analysis. If there is a potential traffic problem -- as would certainly seem to be the case -- steps should be taken to deal with that problem directly and explicitly in connection with any planned construction. As the Staff Report states, West Benton Street should be deemphasized as a major arterial street and that may require reducing still more high density residential -13- does say that a majority of 100 persons surveyed think some parts of the proposed development are needed." But, as we have seen, this says very little does not event say that those affirmative respondents thought the indeed. It for that matter, "need" outweighed any adverse effect on property in the area or, ossible adverse thought about a p effect as relevant to their answer at all. The nd limited conclusion that report does .state the developer's self-serving a ment will enhance the surrounding "apartment projects n the proposed_ develop ort, from owners* and refers to the market survey and "to the letters of supp letters were included in the application from Support of adjacent property.' Supp menu reasonably believe the develop two of the five nearest apartment=owners who II ay but their view is hardly erty. would increase the rental value of their prop, development's effect on property 'in the entire dispositive -of- question of the develop persons who refer to the,: area. An endorsement was also included from four P that the proposed location as "near our proposed locatproperty" and state their feeling of surrounding pro 11 But project will "add to the value and desireability er the application reveals that who bave these four persons are the very P agreed to sell the residential property (at a handsome sum) on which the place the developer wants to proposed commercial development. that there is nothing here to give residents - It is not an overstatement to say affected. Yet ts will not be a of the area confidence that their interests will there should it would seem that, if a comprehensive zoning plan has any meaning, be the most thorough examination of this question and there should be the ounding property. strongest assurances to the owners of surr ressions of support from'a of the Application refers to "expressions ority support is * Later, the Summary ro erty owners." This claim of maj majority of the udjacent.p P to tYefacts as I understand them• not substantiated and is contrary -16 - We do not know what pressure for other uses the future will bring about. We do know, however, that it is_easier _to make than to carry out a promise(letalone a "hope") and that it is easier to place requirements on paper than to enforce them over long periods of time. It does not seem particularly bold to predict enforcement difficulties with a requirement that permits only those stores that serve the neighborhood "primarily" rather than larger sections of thecity (especially in view of the apparent differences between developer and Planning staff in defining the neighborhood). Future failure to control the area to which any particular businesscaters would undermine important assumptions about economic feasibility, traffic impact, and effect on property. In other cases--- for example, the maintenance of buffers recommendedby the Staff (though not-- explicitly ot-explicitly required by the Commission) -- the surrounding property is likely to suffer even more directly if and when the controls break down in the future. We. also know that as the zoning:.. change becomes an accompli shed.fact and as the developer's_ investment increases in money and as the solid buildings are actually constructed, the leverage on the developer's side to make such changes as then appear "necessary" will grow rapidly. Even at the present stage of proposing preliminary plans, concern for the developer's investment' seemed to influence some members of the Commission in deciding whether to approve the application or to postpone decision for further consideration including a request for a legal opinion to answer questions that troubled some Commission members. Concern for the developer's investment is understandable, but the eroding impact it could have on the future will of city officials should not be ignored. And the investment _of_many -surrounding property owners should also not be ignored. One final matter should be noted in connection with consideration of the effect of the proposed commercial development on the surrounding residential -- property. The developer's application' includes the purchase and sal e;;:agre.ement t1(5R -Crt- 161 tol/ 01 >G= • PETITION ` We, the undersigned, state that we are opposed to the rezoning of a tract of land in the 800 block of West, Benton Street from R3A to PC for the Heritage Square Projects for any or all of the following reasons: 1. Probability of added vehicular traffic from outside the area. 2. Possiblilty of thru-traffic and access from highway l into the area. 3. Proximity to school; a. Safety of children going to and from school b. Potential exposure of school age children to -less than desirable products marketed by some of the proposed tenants 4. Proximity of existing commercial areas with same services available. 5. Spot zoning in residential areas not consistant`with desirable residential , planning re: factors of noise, concrete,lighting. 6. Creation of future potential rezoning in the area. 7. Potential increased crime rate associated with 24 hour convenience centers. Vamp - Address -Date _ 7;33 -1 V ! (MG- 29-71 PETITION • We, the undersigned, state that we are opposed to tho rezoning of_a tract of land in the 800 block of West Benton Street from R3A to PC for the Heritage Square Projects for any or all of the following reasons: I. Probability of added vehicuLar trafficfrom; outside the area. 2. 'Possiblilty of thru-traffic and access from highway l into the area.<. 3. Proximity to school; a. Safety of children going toandfrom school b. Potential exposure of 'school age children to.less than desirable' products marketed by some of the proposed tenants 4. Proximity of existing commercial areas with same servicesavailable. 5. Spot zoning in residential areas not consistant with desirable residential planning re: 'factors of noise, concrete, lighting. 6. Creation of future potential rezoning in the area. 7..- Potential increased crime rate associated with 24 hour.` convenience centers. Name Address - Date 'j7a 26 11y1 PETITION' • We, the undersigned, state that we are Opposed land in the 800 block of West Benton Street fomR3AttotPC for Projects for any or all of the following reasons:' rezoning of a tract of 1. Probabilit the Heritage Square 2• Probability of added vehicular traffic from outside the area. y of school. traffic and access from highway 1 into the area. 3. Proximity to school; a. Safety of childrengoingto and from school. b. Potential exposure of school age children to products marketed by some of the less than desirable 4. Proximity of existingproposed tenants 5• Spot tonin commercial, areas with same services available. g in residential areas not consistant with desirable residential Planning re: .factors of noise, -concrete, lighting. 6. Creation of future potential rezoning in the ting 7• Potential_ increased crime rate associated with 24 hour convenience centers. Name _ v —1 Address .vu— _ V'•__• " nt'L _ ; i nn n Date` LZ v Z 76 �5� o q-77 74� r IT QC' ca-� -6 ♦g� Pii1'ITION We, the undersigned, state that we are opposed to the rezoning of a tract of land in the 800 block of West Benton Street from _R3A^to PC for:.the Heritage Square -- ;Projects for any or all of the following reasons: 1. Probability of added vehicular traffic from outside the area. 2. Possiblilty of'thru-traffic and access from highway l into the area. .' 3. Proximity to school; a. Safety of children going to and from school b. Potential exposure of school age children to.less than desirable - products marketed by some of the proposed tenants 4. Proximity of existing commercial areas with same services available. 5. °Spot 'zoning in residential areas not consistant with desirable residen_tial planning re: factors of noise, concrete;, lighting. 6. Creation of future potential rezoning in the area. 7. Potentialincreased crime rate associated with 24 hour convenience centers. Name Address Date Jr - . -Kco' tn 4d22!pt Cb'iS CZ _� � �!%zll %G 9 t Ze /��SA? To: City 04unc1.1, City of Iotm City, Ionat We object to commercial development, amidst our residential ebmmunttY,-in the 75.7 to 900 block area of lJcs' Hmnton, Iowa City, Iowa From: ztesidents of 755 and 757 ;Jest Benton, Iowa City, 913017o U C.,��-.. d=fin �--� - = l726 r RESOLUTION NO. 76-366 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING A CONTRACT FOR REAL ESTATE APPRAISAL SERVICES BETWEEN -THE 'CITY OF IOWA CITY AND IOWA APPRAISAL' AND RESEARCH CORPORATION WHEREAS, the City of Iowa City, acting as the Local Public Agency, has under date September Z, 1970, entered into Contract for a Loan and Capital Grant with the United States of America providing for financial aid to the Local Public Agency under Title I of the Housing Act of 1949 as amended to date, for the implementation of an urban renewal project known as Project No. Iowa R-14; and, WHEREAS, the Local Public Agency, pursuant to such Contract, is undertaking activities necessary to execute the Urban Renewal Plan'for the urban renewalproject described in such Contract; and, WHEREAS, in the implementation of those activities the Local'PublicAgency has need for certain professional real estate appraisal services; and, WHEREAS, Iowa Appraisal and Research Corporation of Des Moines, Iowa,.is qualified, capable, and desirous of performing such services: NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Iowa City hereby authorizes and directs the execution of a Contract for Re-use Appraisal of Redevelopment Sites between the City of Iowa City and Iowa Appraisal and Research -Corporationfor the performance of such services, a copy of said contract being, attached to this resolution andbyreference made a part hereof. It was moved by deProsse and seconded by Foster that the Resolution as read be adopted and upon roll call there were: AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: _ Balmer _{ deProsse _ X Foster X Neuhauser - X Perret X Selzer _ - X Vevera Passed and approved this 5th day of October 1976. Mayor ATTEST:l�l4tP llil. C l:L� City Clerk RZCU1 2;D & BY THE LEGAL_DEPILRTMZNT COMERACr FOR REUSE APPRAISAL OF RED EVELOP,,At:Mr SITES 11115 'AGRIiEMrWr entered into this ,�C� by and between The City of Iowa City,l 4. day of 11ib1ic Agency" and -Iowa A owa ereinafter re� raisaL and Research'Cor oration to as t e ,lgca� ereina ter re err" to as t e ppralser WHEREAS the Local Public Agency hereinafter referred to as g Y Proposes.`to dispose of certain;"properties,, and/or removal of certain structures " after roved the "sites after the same have been cleared by_g�olition maps, containing information more s p , as shown .on a disposal ma or. hereof pacifically enumerated hereinafter in Para ra h'2 and within the boundaries of an area .referred to „ Area", more particularly described hereinafter in Paragraph hereot, and;desirP as: --the Project."' to obtain a final appraisal of each site, assuming it is prepared for redevelopment as Project Are and an analysis of the marketability of all. of -the sites ioithin the Project Area, MV, THEREFORE, the Local, Public Agency and the Appraise ws:r, for the considerations and under the conditions hereinafter set forth do agree as follo 1, 17he Appraiser agrees to a. Consult with and advise the Local Public enc may be mutually convenient for -the parties to"this contract ;re ardi A8 y, at such time or tunes as.. functions performed and to be: performed hereunder and'the-real estate aspects of the Local PublicAgency's e e the'`. to the reports prepared and obeprepared and programs which are related__. contract ) the Appraiser under this b• Appraise each of the sites as requested by the Local Public Agency, C. Make such inspections, investigations, and; studies as are necessa appropriate to enable the Appraiser to Perform properly the function bebe performed by the Appraiser:under this contract, d. Prepare and deliver to the Local Public following notice by Agency, within 30, days of the a Y the Local Public Agency to Proceedwit t e preparation re appraisal report, an appraisal -report i.n two (2)-6opies, which port shall conform to recognized professional practice opieshawh among other things, contain the following:and (1) Letter of Transmittal, A letter of transmittal, which shall contain a sutmnary o t a principal findings, conclusions and'suggestions the. -Appraiser, including the A r ggestions of ppraiser s estimates of the fair value of each of the sites 'in the Project Area for use in accordance wi h the Urban Renewal Plan. (2) General Findin s, With respect to the ProiecT. Area as a whole,; an aria a of t t e principal factors influencing the.marketabilit value of the sites in the Project Area includinand such matters as the activity of the local real estate market during g consit ration of: _Z_ theast several p .years for properties comparable to the siaes,,the current demand for such properties _and the extent of competitive + properties presently,ava.ilable to meet the current -and future demand anticipated in a reasonable length of time, the environmet of. the area, its location with respect to the remainder of the community; and the site improvements proposed to be installed; by-theLLocal Public Agency: (3) A raisal of the Individual Sites. For each site, he conclusions and suggestions ot t e ppraiser, aogether with the analyses and. data by which they were derived, as follow: (a) An opinion of the fair value of the -site for use in accordance with the Urban. Renewal Plan. (b) The conclusions of the Appraiser as to the use, or types of use, ' for which the site is reasonably suitable, subject to the conditions and restrictions which are proposed to`be'imposed-upon the disposition, together with the opinion of the,'Appraiser as to the best or most profitable future use for the land in conformity with the Urban Reneti�al:Plan. -The conclusions of. the; Appraiser shall be supported by'an-analysis of; the uses. -to which the- land. could be devoted under the Urban Renewal Plan. (c) Information with respect to comparable properties which were: considered by the Appraiser in estimating the fair:value'of the site for uses in accordance with the Urban Renewal. Plan. ` The Appraiser's valuation of the respective sit esIshould:;generally be predicated, among other factors, -upon:comparison'of the site with other similar properties. In making such comparisons,;. appropriate allowance should be, made for all` differences which are pertinent as to the desirability :for ,the proposed new use or uses of the site and the propertieswithwhich:it 'is compared. These comparisons should also take into account such -factors as the existence or -absence -of structural;improvemerits on the :.. property,..- location of, the -property, `-its , surroundings', distance from business centers, location of improved'`streets and roads, location of industries, condition:and appearance, and other relevant factors. The income-producing potentialities of •_•he site when redeveloped for the proposed new use or uses should .also be considered. ,. (d) In the event the use specified; in the Urban Renewal. Plan is a public use or a private nonprofit use and such use.'is a type of use for which there is no established market the Appraiser, in addition, shall :furnish -an ,opinion of the value of:such site'for use for the most appropriate alternative use -or uses` compatible with the Urban Renewal Plan for the-Project,Area as 'a whole (in- cluding residential, commercial, or other uses, or a'combination thereof). (e) Other information and analyses considered by the Appraiserto be relevant to the marketabi lity,; the valuation, orthe - Cornuilation by the I.ocal ILblic Agency of its program for .` disposal or the: site. Il;e Local Public Agern:y agrees to furnish to the Appraiser: a. Copies of a disposal map, or maps, drawn to scale and showing ,the entire Project Area and the proposed boundaries of each site, and 'further`showing: , (1) The dimensions and land area of each site. (2) Rights-of-i-ray_for streets, driveways, and walks or sidewalks, adjacent or providing access to each site. (3) Easements, if any, to be reserved. b. A statement of the conditions and restrictions proposed to be 'imposed; on each site and on the redevelopers of such sites, in the contracts fore. conveyance or ,lease and in the conveyances or .leases 'of the land,` including all conditions and restrictionswith respect to the development and use `land of theand the time of beginning and completion of the:building;of improvements thereon. c. All available information as to, proposed zoning and as to proposed building regulations, or restrictions, pertaining_to the Project: Area. d. Access to, and permission to inspect, at reasonable times and under reason- able conditions, -any plans,. publications, reports, stati.stics,s_studies, records, or other data or information:(except.appraisals by others and information considered confidential` by the Local Public Agency) prepared or owned by the Local Public -Agency and relevant to thesubjectmatter"of the services 11 to be furnished by the Appraiser under this contract. 3. The values Local Public Agency and the Appraiser agree that the appraisals of the land shall be based on the following .assumptions: a. That all transfers of property, whether by sale or by lease, shall be based _ upon the binding condition'' that such sites shall be developed in accordance with the Urban Renewal-:lan and that actual utilization of such lands shall be begun, by the purchaser or his agents within a reasonable -: time subsequent to the transfer. b. That if there are, at the time of appraisal, restrictions on the use of materials or labor which would prevent a'.purchaser.of:.the land from constructing improvements in accordance `iwith the Urban Renewal is Plan, the Appraiser shall estimate the fair -value of the: and £or use :in:accordance with the Urban Renewal Plan under the assumption that such restrictions are not in effect, and shall, in addition, give the Appraiser's -estimate of the extent to which the existence of suchrestrictions.impairs-such value. -4- 4- The Local Public Agency reserves the right to request, and the Appraiser agrees to furnish,.any additional information pertinent to the appraisal.and=the analysis and not contained in the appraisal reports. 5. The performance of services or acceptance of the reportsrequired hereunder shall not relieve the Appraiser from the obligation to correct any defective work, whether previously or subsequently discovered, and all incomplete, inaccurate or defective work shall be remedied by the Appraiser, on demand without cost to the Local Public Agency. 4• The Local Public Agency shall pay to the Apprai services performed hereunder ser compensation for all :n the total amount of: j 25o.0o per appraisal which shall include such additional or supplemental data as ma ,be under' Paragraph 4 or Paragraph 5 hereof. y. required 7- The Appraiser's rights, obligations, and duties under this contract shall not be -assigned or transferred in whole or in part (whether by -assignment,. novation, or othencise), but this provision shall not prohibitthe assignment of proceeds due or to become due hereunder.: This contract may be assigned by the Local Public Agency ,to any corporation, agency, or. Instrumentality having authority to accept the assignment. 8- hone of the work or services covered by this contract shall. be subcontracted. 9.` 1'ho appraiser agrees that any and all reports prepared and conclusions reached hereunder are for the information of the Local.Publ.ic Agency and that' neither the Appraiser nor any member of the Appraiser's Personnel will disclose any, Of the same in whole or in part to any person whatsoever or discuss the same with any person whatsoever, other than theLocalPublic Agency or` -its authorized representatives, except when called upon to testify in relation to such report or conclusions under oath in a judicial forum, or as may be otherwise required by law. 10. As an inducement to the execution of this agreement by the local Public Agency, the Appraiser represents and-agrees,that_the Appraiser has not employed any person to solicit or; procure this contract, and hasnotmade,-and will not make, any payment or any 'agreement forthe payment of any comn, missio percentage, brokerage, contingent fee, or. any other compensation°missionection with the procurement of this contract, and `,that t:he'Appraiser has:noc now and will not acquire, prior to the disposition of: all the sites'by -the Local Public Agency, any interest (including that 'of real estate agent or broker), direct or indirect, present_or prospective, in any -of the sites•of.the Project Area, and has not employed, and will not employ, i.n_connection with work to be performed hereunder, any person having any such interest_ during'the'term of this contract, either directly or indirectly. 11. During the performance of this contract, the Appraiser agrees as follows: a. The Appraiser will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race ,;_creed, color, or national origin. :The Appraiser will take affirmative'action to ensure that; applicants are employed, and that employees are, treated during employment, without regard to their race, Icreed. color, or national origin. include, but,not belimitedto, the following Such action shall motion, or transfer;. recruitment or recruitment _adveitisin� pgrading, de= p yment u termination; rates of pay or. otherformsof c g; layoff, or for training, includin apprenticeshipompensation; and selectionPOSt, conspicuous places, 'availbletoe.. The Appraiser agrees to. ti in notices to be provided by the Local public Aees nenapplicants,for employment, provisions of this nondiscrimination clause;g Agency Setting forth the b. The Appraiser will, inallsolicitations or advertisements for mployees placed'by or on behalf of the Appraiser,_state that aml. will receive consideration for employment qualified.applicants color, or national origin. p yment..without regard to race, creed, 12. No hfember of or Delegate to the Congress of the United States of, America, and no Resident Commissioner shall be admitted to any share or part of this contract or to any benefit to arise herefrom. 13. No member of the Local Public Agency shall participate in,any decision relating to this contract which affects his . any corporation personal interests or, the interests :of directly interested; norsshalloany member, on in officerlca entlsodirectly or in - Local -Public Agency have any interest, direct or -indirect: in-thisoContraIcthe or the proceeds thereof. 14. The Project Area is described as follows: Project Iowa R-14, bounded by Washington Street on the north, Linn Street on the east, Court,Street'On_the south, and an irregular boundary comprised of the:Iowa River, Burlington Street,' Front Street, College Street, and Capitol Street on the west. 15. As used in this contract, the term "site" means any one or;more tracts designated as a site on the disposal map or maps. 16:- The term "Urban Renewal Plan" as used in this contract means: The Urban Renewal Plan approved by the,g on October 2 ovel'ning body of the locality idents l as oll.w, ,_19 69 as amended,'which`Plan'is The Urban Renewal Plan, City -University Project I, Project Iowa R-14, Iowa City, Iowa, 17• -It is expressly agreed that this contract is for appraisal sewices of not less than six, nor more than YO sites• however the above notwithstanding, -:this contract may be terminated by either party within 30 days, upon written notice to the other party. AteRESOLUTION NO. 76-367 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING A- CONTRACT :FOR REAL ESTATE APPRAISAL SERVICES BETWEEN THE CITY OF IOWA CITY AND ROY R. FISHER, INC. WHEREAS, the City of Iowa City, acting as the Local Public Agency, has under, date September 2,-1970, entered into Contract fora Loan_, and Capital Grant with the United States of America providing for financial aid to ,the Local Public Agency under Title I of the Housing Act of 1949 as amended to date, for the implementation of an urban renewal project known as Project No. Iowa R-14; and, WHEREAS, the Local Public Agency, pursuant to such Contract, is undertaking; activities necessary to execute the Urban Renewal Plan for the urban renewal project described in such Contract; and, WHEREAS, in the implementation of those activities the Local Public Agency has need for certain professional real estate appraisal services; and, WHEREAS, Roy R. Fisher, Inc., of Davenport, Iowa, is qualified, capable, and desirous of performing such services: NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Iowa City hereby authorizes and directs the execution of a Contract for Re -use Appraisal of Redevelopment Sites between the City of Iowa City and Roy R. Fisher, Inc., for the performance of such services, a copy of said contract being attached to this resolution and by reference made a part hereof. It was moved by Foster and seconded by Selzer that the Resolution as read be adapted and upon roll call there were: AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: X Balmer X deProsse X _ Foster X - Neuhauser X Perrot X Selzer X Vevera--- __ - Passed and approved this 5th day of October 1976. Mayor ATTEST:�ilL RECEIVED -& AvPEO�'111 BY THE LEGAL DEPARTMENT C? -3 a- 23 CONfRACf FOR REUSE APPRAISAL OF/D/iz/9G REDEVELOAtEW SI1�S '17[f.43 AGRFitti($ enter by and between The (:1t ed into this C� da lLhi is Agency" Y of Iowa C' Y of - and RoY R. F' rtY. owa ereinafter r' err cher, erejna ter Inc. 19 7� re err to as t e to as t e „�ca�, WHLREAS the PPraiser 6 hereinafter Local Public q ' ardl or ren referred to as Agency Proposes to soval of certain the sites" after dispose`of maps, con[ainin structures and the same have beentain properties, hereof g information more 's Improved, as sho cleared b Arvall ,and located within the Pecificall wn °n a`d'- bydemolition e.particularl boundaries of y enumerated hereinafIsPosal map or -- to obtaimore a'final a Y described hereinaftern•area referred"to as,the Para r as Proposed appraisal of each in Para 8 aph 2 as Project and an analysis of the site, assuming it �aph 14 hereofh and des es j Area, marketabilif prepared for redeveloPmeret n'OW Y °f all of the sites within the THEREFORE aril undeC the condi tiohe Local Public A en 1- The q ns hereinafter set forth, �o aghe ree assfolloor the considerations Appraiser agrees to a• Consult with may be mut�alland advise the Local Functions y Convenient for the Agency aspect to'be to thist time or tunes;as,. as Performed and Parties such to the ref the Local Public Performed hereunder andntract, regardin y-she.real estateg the contract. prepared bnd ports prepared and to11replans Y the-qr r which are ,related. b. Appraise PP aiser under this each of the sites c• Atake'suchinspections as requested 6Y the inspectio Local Public Agenty- a appropriate to enab e�the invgestigations Performed by the Appraiser under raisertO n and properlare necessary or d' PTe are this contract. Y the functio P and deliver to i ns to following notice b the Local Public Of the appraisal report a, Public Agency too within qs da s P shall co appraisalortProceed wit .,t epre Y ` other things, contain conformto, pofessionan two (2) copies preparation: following; - 1 Practice which (1) Letter of and shall, among Transmittal. a summary, o t A letter of the Appraiser a Principal'findin s transmittal, Tvhich s including the q g ' Conclusions, and " halL contain °f each °f the sites in the ppraiser s estiroateS °f �ggestions of the Urban Renewal Plan. Project Area the fair for use in accords value . (Z) General Find]. nce with ana yszs o s IUith resprinect to`the value`of the sites cipal-factors I'TOject Area as a whole such in the influencing the marketab Matters Project Area an activit Including Y''and as the includ' alit Y of the;local,`real g. Consideration of estate market during -2 - the past several years for properties comparable to the sites, the' current demand for such properties and the -extent of competitive current and future -de r3 properties presently available to meet the `anticipated in a reasonable -length of time, the envirorunent'ofthe `, area, 'its location with respect to the remainder of the comu'uni ty;.` and the site improvements proposed to'be installed by the -Local Public Agency. (3) A raisal of the Individual S suggeites. For each site, the conclusions ' an stions o tie :appraiser, together with the a data by which they were derived, as follow: nalyses and (a) An opinion of the fair value of the site foruse in accordance with the Urban Renewal Plan. (h) The conclusions of the Appraiser as to the use, br types of use, for which the site is reasonably suitable, subject to;the:conditio and restrictions 'which 'are proposed to be imposed upon -the disposition, together with the opinion,of the Appraiser -`,as to the best or most profitable future use for the land in, conformity with the Urban Renewal Plan. The conclusions aiser' 'e,Appr- shall be supported by an analysis of the. uses ofto whthe.Appre land' could be devoted under the Urban Renewal Plan. (c) Information with respect to comparable -properties which were considered by the Appraiser in estimating. the fair value of the site for uses ,in accordance with the Urban Renewal Plan. The Appraiser's valuation of the respective sites should generally be predicated, among other factors, uponcomparison of the site" with other similar properties. sons -In making compari appropriate allowance should be made for all differencewhi are pertinent as to the desirability for.the-prs:ch;oposed new use or uses of, the site and the properties with which it is`campared. These comparisons should also take into account such factors as the existence or absence of structural improvements on the. property,'location of the property, its surroundings, distance from business centers location of- improved streets and:stance- location of industries, condition and appearance and other relevant factors. The income-producing potentiaiities`of the site when redeveloped for the proposed new use or`uses 'should also be considered. (d) In the event the use specified in the Urban"Renewal Plan is a . public use or a private nonprofit use and such' -use is a .type ofz. use for which there is no established market, the Appraiser,. in. addition, shallfurnishan opinion of the value of%such sitefor• use for the most appropriate alternative use or uses compatible:: with the Urban Renewal Plan; for the Project Area as a whole (in eluding residential, coamercial,' or other uses, or a combination thereof). -3 - Other info rmation and he relevant to the m;iranalYses forniulstio Ietab.i.litco idered by the A disl'osaI or the tsiteocal Public Agency e v f�ation;.or theser to The Local ;Public-Agenc its program a. Co of a d y agrees to furnish to the Appraiser. Pies Project Area and sal map, or maps, draw �1) Proposed boundaries to scale and s e; dimensions and land of each site how £u therentii and f2) Ri area of each showing: ghts-of-, site. or Providing accessttoets eachdsiteWa walks or driveways and sidewalks, adjacent (3) Easements, if any to be b A statement of reserved. each site a the conditions conveyance and On the redeveloper restrictions Vance or lease all'Condifio and in thes of such Proposed to be conve sites, in th Of the landand atherestrictions with respect or leases of contracts for - time ed on f time of. be respect to the land r prm'ements thereon. ginning and the d including let evelopment:and use c. All available comp ion of the building of liable information as to re8ulatio Access ns, or restrictions, perta3ni� zoning and as to d. ss to and g to the proposed able Condit io Permission to ins �Oject Area P building records �' any plans inspect at reasonable or other data 'Publications times and o�Ormation consider Or`informatio ' reports; stmes under reason_ ° I by the Low pubnfident- by theePt appraisals Statistic. studies; the services to becal lic"Agency and re Local I�blic qg ncthers ` rnished ared A. and alueccal_Public Agenc by the pPralserantider this the oJect matter of y and PP iser ntract.: shall be based on the A ra. a. That all transfers the following assim pilo ns:t the appraisals of the " Property, la accordbased ance bind- rop rtY, whethnd er such ds sale or b with urban co Renewal that such sites shal lease, $hall be time subsequent to b b Plan es that 1 be, develo went Y the actual. ped in to the transfer. purchaser utilization of b That if there are une °r his agents within a reasonable: mater , attile const111s or labor which wt °f appraisal APpra sering improvements Dul11 a prevent a'Iurchaserictions on the use of With the Uball'estimate accord iyith of the land an the p the fair value of the Urban Reneiral from are not. in effect - lan under the t1'e land an, the or the exte and shall, ass for; use :in accordance. value. "tent to which the in`additio option that such restr'c In of n' g1ve the i -tions such r Appraiser's est estrictiorLs nriafe Impairs such' -4- 4 The Local Public Agency reserves the right to request, and the to furnish, any additional information:pertinent to the; appraisal and the v}alysis and not contained in'the appraisal reports:- App raiser. agrees' 5• '}7re performance of services or 'acceptance of the reports required hereunder. shall not relieve the Appraiser from the obligation to correct any work, whether previously or subsequently discovered, and all incomplete, inaccurate, or defective work shall be remedied b om defective Appraise- without cost to the Local Public Agency. Y the Appraiser on demand 6. The Local Public Agency shall pay to the Appraiser compensation services performed hereunder in the total amount for all of $.275.00 which shall include such additional or supplementalper appraisal data— : under Paragraph'4 or Paragraph 5 hereof. a be required 7. The Appraiser's rights, obligations, and duties under this contract shall not be.assigned -or transferred in whole or in part (whether by, assignment, novation,_or otherwise), but this gnment ntract may be assigned provision shall not prohibit-the assi of proceeds due or to become due hereunder: This co by the Local Public Agency to any corporation; agency, or instrum entality having authority to accept the assignment. 8. None of the work or services covered by this contract shall be subcontracted. -`-i. The appraiser agrees that any and all reports prepared and nd that. neither conclusions reached hereunder are for the information of the Local Public Agena' tile cy_ e Appraiser nor any member of the Appraiser's personnel Will-9Y any Of : the same in whole or in part; to any person whatsoever or discuss the same with any person whatsoever, other than the Local public,Agency.or its authorized representatives, except when called-upon to testify in relation to such report or .conclusions under oath in a judicial forum, or as may be Otherwise required by law.' 10. As an inducement to the execution of this agreement by the Local Public Agency, the Appraiser represents and agrees that the Appraiser has not employed any person to solicit or procure this contract; and has not made, and Will not make, any payment or any agreement for the and of t mady. e, percentage, brokerage, contingent fee, or any other compensation in connection with the procurement of this contract, and that the Appraiser has not°now and will not acquire, prior to the disposition of all the sites by the Local Public Agency, any interest (including that of _real estate agent'or broker), direct or indirect, present or prospective, in any of the sites Of-the Project Area; and has not and will not employ, in connection with -work to be performed hereunder, any person having _any such interest during term of this contract, eitherdirectly or indirectly. 1L During the performance of this contract, the Appraiser agrees as'follows a. The Appraiser: will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, creed, color,-or national origin. the -Appraiser will take affirmative action to en- that 'applicants are- employed, and that employees are treated ing employment, without :regard _. to"their -race, 'creed, color, or national origin. Such action shall include, but not be limited to, the following: employment, upgrading, de motion, or transfer recruitment or recruitment adv�irtising; layoff or. termination;_ rates' of pay or other.forms of compensation; and selection for training, including apprenticeship. The Appraiser, agrees to post in conspicuous places, available to employeesland applici`nts for employment;. .> notices to, be provided by the Local Public Agency sett?ng forth the provisions of this nondiscrimination clause. b. The Appraiser will, in all solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by or on behalf of the Appraiser, state that all qualified applicants` will receive consideration for employment without regard to race, creed,' color, or national origin. ' 12. NoMemberof or Delegate to the Congress of the United States.of America, and no Resident Commissioner, shall be admitted to any ,share or part of this contract or to any benefit to arise here£rom. ls. No member of the Local Public Agency shall participate in any decision relating - to this contract which affects his personal interests or the interests of any corporation, partnership, or association in which he is directly or in- directly interested; nor shall any member, officer, agent, or.employee of --the Local Public Agency have any interest, direct or indirect, in this contract=` or the proceeds thereof. 14. The Project Area is described as follows: Project Iowa R-14, bounded by Washington Street on the north, Linn Street -on the east.,- Court Street on the south, and an irregular boundary comprised of the Iowa River, Burlington street, Front Street, College Street, and Capitol.Street on -the west. 15. As used in this contract, the term "site" as a site on the disposal map or mapsmeansany one or more tracts designated i . -- 16. The term "Urban Renewal Plan" as used in this contract means The Urban Renewal Plan approved by the governing body of the locality on October 2, ; 19 69 as amended; which Plan is idents i as follows: The Urban Renewal Plan, City -University Project I, Project Iowa R-14, Iowa City, Iowa. 17. Itis expressly_ agreed that this contract is for appraisal services of not less than six, nor more than 10 sites; however, the above notwithstanding, this contract may be terminated by either party within five days,; upon written notice to.the other party. .r. 7 FIRST NATIOM BANK DECIDUOUS SOLAR SCREEN The placement of a deciduous tree, solar screen depends upon the latitude (distance from the equator) at which a structure is located. A solar screen for one to two story building located at BO° North latitude would consist of several eight to ten foot fast growing trees planted twenty feet from the structure and twenty feet apart on the south and southwest sides of the building. • effectiveide an As theees solaroscreen wtheiithin ould eight to in to tenvyears. T{i`�NPORM ION REDUCE UNEVEN HEATING AND COOLING LOADS Trees reduce excessively high daytime temperatures in their surroundings by evaporating water. Trees absorb solar radiation at a very fast rate, tduring his nthe ner tees and release heat much more slowly. In moderate extreme swings between daytime highs and night- time lows, which reduces uneven heating and cooling loads. The evaporation effects of trees are greatly increased by having many large trees nearby. NOON ii pECADW1Pus so DAA' Pj IzTT10iV EXTRA INSULATION Evergreen trees and large shrubs can be used for extra insulation to reduce summer cooling and winter heating loads. Conifers trap dead air between themselves and the structure, thus reducing the tendency of the structures to lose heat in the winter or gain heat in the summer. Similarly, deciduous shrubs can be placed on the south side of structures for summer insulation. Conifers used for insulation purposes should be planted close to the structure and close together. GOOD TREES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL USES TFort he following trees are good choices for planting in Coshoul llins, or r before yourtcountyuextension agent or your City Planning Department for more information, 484-4220, extension 224. Deciduous Trees: Thornless Floneylocust, Hackberry, Little Leaf, Norway Maple, Green Cofee Tree Linden, Kentucky ttonlessCottonwood. Coniferous Trees: Austrian Pine, Pinyon, Ponderosa, Colorado Blue Spruce, Roc Mountain Juniper, and White Fir. ter_ ADDITIOiIAL INFORt7ATION Oil TREES QI' T`8c''IR h1SIhS Useful information on tree's and i+heir uses Tan be found in your local library, froji your caiinjjy extens;� agent or from one, on these books, l i I. I TREES, By James Underwood, Ceockett, l�usf Ledj,Pife, PJew York, 1972, 160;' pages; ! s' VERGR Time, HOME AND ENVIRONMENT, By T. K'. Dri:u, FY Morse Countrysides Bar06gton, IL' Ilnoisilu h'jted, A3. ,7 61 pages PrANTS PEOPLE AND. ENVIRONMENTAL pUITY.4 Bare he United States Department. o. me nor WAshington, D.C., 1973, 5 7 pages strategy,, DI, I PH 0 T054'NT�})✓51 S G`l�Ct.H.S IEN62G`i' AND mATEI>tALS �LA2 F_NEQCvy' (_A2 60fJ 1)tJXd VE 1, N)U 1, WATIP— oxyrArw W F}'L'E 2 \4APo2 Cp,Q (30+4�J) fzATE S This leaflet was prepared by the Fort Collins Planning Department with printing funded by the F asl National Bonk as a community service Typing and editing by Kathy Elston, and tent and gmphu.s by Rick Geshwder Printed on 100% re cycled paper. October 1975. TREE ECOLOGY = TREE ENERGY As trees and other green plants co into chemical energy- by phoyosynth with the environment. The role th these interactions is well defined magnified by the large size and pe Trees participate in material cycle help to recycle gases, liquids and for life. As they carry on photosy take in carbon dioxide (CO"s which and they release oxygen (OZ)', which This helps to maintain air quality relationship between plants, and am on for millions of years. In a.sim help to recycle water and minerals system. In most instances which they occur, dominant form of vegetation. They finance by their ability to change t environment more toward thei:,r needs plants. Over millions of years man; of trees have evolved, enab'Ting dif use their dominance to take maximum different situations, such as fores mountain sides. As trees grow they increase .their d site. The increasingly larger, leaf the cooling effects of shade and ev the insulation and windbreak effect create. The total effect of this e modification can be dramatilc. As a ersity study has shown, when the ai 84° F, surface temperatures:may, var, on a street to 73° F on a forest fl a quarter mile away)•.. Using trees to help save energy is for not only are trees beim! used i role, but they are also beingused sistent. with earth's natural! energy II I II rt!solatiiqttergy , 'they jteract reel hay j in ;.q Togicall� and 1'ai cense of , trees..` 1i ley ley �y its !es tial is 1'iirpaS e?j ;le; irpa�s i� ;le. �,i contiOli; a basic I'd s . that fi gone pear:manne:rtrees ougfi, tti co- tl'rlees pare, ie 1q►lieve tii;eu dom- e 0919, their ma ifies on, -("I d tres entii na Ur� �v.- ra> zs o Aloe. than Cally! wise, ENERGY AND TREES Americans are concerned with energy conservation, the cost of energy and the future supply of fuel ;1 to heat and cool their homes and businesses, run S U (<� EA2'1i :NS their cars and trucks, and power their lights F— N EAG Y and appliances. ENERGY AND TREES is a leaflet �` Q (, d';� ET designed to give valuable information on how i. Your home or business can save energy by using trees in their immediate environment. ENERGY < o. AND TREES illustrates the why and where-To—plant 'G �� trees to make homes and businesses easier to cool 1 in the summer and heat in the winter, plus illust- rating \/ tree ecology concepts. J ENERGY CYCLES In order to understand !low trees can save energy, that would be used for heating and cooling, it is necessary to understand how trees get the energy which they use. Trees and all green plants receive r solar energy and store it in biologically useful �___ • (\`'�.I�, chemical compounds that may be used directly b the tree or indirectly by animals and people. This is Presently, we are using fossil fuels, s;'tSGred mi'1lioCjs the basic process on which all life on earth depends of years ago, at rage ced. r tharo tfipyrwere de - and is part of earth's energy cycle. posited, or can be replaced. thus, iit'ojcomes very; important for us to Conserve ejliergy and; i!o study As solar energy enters the atmosphere, some of it is earth's energy system to see Flaw We can gise the energy reflected back into space by dust particles and which is all around us more efjrectirreT�i,,One method.' clouds. Of the energy which continues particles to the of using currently, gnutili,zed:q�nero, #,,to use solan surface of the earth, most warms the surface and the energy before it %s reradi.atedl back rota Apace, The air (creating weather); and the remainder is used end result of using sgra energy has, no+;eFfett an by green plants, in the process of photosynthesis. the earth's energy cycle, singelits Usning.ener Of the energy converted by plants; some is used for already passing through the sy:�tem. ljis.is energy Their growth and survival; some is eaten by animals iman provement over the present e;;gcess;usr o;, fossil and used for their growth and survival; some is and nuclear fulls, which Put _ tlPl much 1031 into the used by people for building material, paper products system too fast, creating therloT polluti'n. and firewood; and the remainder is stored over long The role of trees in he. earth'!? ever „ istem;is and natural gas,. Ultimately, that of a collector of ,solar eite '.! 41, y as the energy convert solar energytoe ciiiee trees which enters earth's energy system is used by plants, ltitb usef�G c¢einic.(r�+energy ands, animals and people, it is reradiated back into grow, they cons;ideraoly! change he'cllimtlj�of their space as waste heat. immediate environment., The eny! rohme'nt' modifica- tions trees create are deseribq; in detaill� in the fold -out section of this Teafle;. WJl CONTICOL WINTER WINDBREAK Wind control by trees can be used either for decreasing the effect of cold winter winds, or for increasing and directing summer breezes. A conifer (evergreen) wind- break can be used to decrease the wind speed downwind by eighty percent for a distance twice the height of the trees in the windbreak. Using this ratio for the place- ment of a winter windbreak, and by knowing the direction Of cold winter winds (usually from the west, northwest, and north); a winter wind screen can be effectively located. INCREASING AND DIRECTING BREEZES Summer breezes may be it of trees dncreased and directed by the careful n the illustrationeatnright, shrubscanrbesplacedleither between a structure and trees, or beyond the trees to get a considerably different effect. Assuming the basic summer wind is from the left of the illustration, shrubs placed between the trees and the structure will Pull a breeze back through the structure (as in A). If the shrubs are placed on the other side of the trees, the basic wind flow will be channelized and increased through the structure (as in B). Q SHADING TEMPERATURE CONTROL Trees control temperature by reflecting solar radiation, by absorbing energy through life processes and by trans- mitting energy to the air and the e solar radiation, cooler tempera tureaenvironments rth. As eare lock created in their shade. On a sunny air temperature, a tree shaded surace can be aexpectF to be approximately 20° F cooler than an unshaded surface. Due to this effect, trees can be used to save energy by reducing the solar heat gain of structures, thus reducing or eliminating the cooling load. DECIDUOUS TREES ADAPT TO SEASONS Deciduous trees make very effective solar screens in •that they provide seasonal adaptation. Trees leaf out . in the late spring, providin shadin needed; and in a similar manner Josegleavesust ain�thes autumn just as it is desirable to have the sun'e war 'ng rays coming through. When planted g and southwest sides of structures, thiseffectn the sm- pro- vides a solar screen which adapts to the seasonpro- automatically. A G C SO KA VN>E pip ( t;l NT11 r .00� A i * 0 m I Aws I iii,. -M., ft— or vort0, iow,n RIVER 1 CORALVILLE DAM 2 OAK-HICICORY WOODS 3 SITE OF BURIAL MOUNDS* 4 MAPLE -BASSWOOD WOODS LIMESTONE QUARRY. WAK-HICKORY WOODS 7 TERRILL MILL PARI(, SITE OFTERRILL'S MILL,; FISHING, PICNIC TABLES, GRILLS, AND OPEN SPACE 8 LIMESTONE OUTCROPPINGS "LOVERS LEAP" 9 DANGERI CORALVILLE POWER DAM 10 BOTTOMLAND lk WOODS 11 LIMESTONE OUTCROPPINGS 12 FERRYCROSSING• 13 "OLD CAPITOL" TERRITORIAL AND FIRST STATE CAPITOL OF IOWA (RESTORED); OPEN MON.—SAT.: 10 A.M.-5 P.M SUNDAYS: 1 P.M. —5 P.M. HOLIDAYS: CLOSED 14 SAND AND GRAVEL QUARRY •VAPOLEON TOWNSITE" \ SAND AND GRAVEL QUARRY 17 SITE OF INDIAN VILLAGFc,. RXI PARK UNIVERSITY PROPERTY RIVERSIDETRAIL (WALKING OR BICYCLING) •dmh, BOATRAMP 4®C GOOD FISHING 00 REFERENCEINTEXT 1E NO VISIBLE EVIDENCE (HISTORICAL SITE) IOWA CITY, IOWA SEPTEMBER, 1976 approx. I cm,, 333.3 M. A INDIAN B171,4IAL!S' FORh1;IR_STAGE', ', COiI JR_STAIJE, I 1 PA�i BOATRAh FISHING YGROUNDEl IpINEN1' AND POLO, mm5 q, c.c'Rm4 m t' `=g n� m m ml J d OD m c F a�m�aaRtoG n��+,9 ga 30 ° '0' R. amm a F o uui 4 Pj 9 m -0 p y m ° o oQa Rm m QO n iio i y°i DO ox 'm F »m m S m n 3 a o m n m J F 'Oo, "a 3'nv C7J Zxo @n5 o Bm z 'a qo R�.°<� o c om,m na^oa a5_mn of gc cc Moo s! 0 •� S F m m S O O° J< o nm' �R Rn^x`° '° N nm mRmam NJ O d K. m •C m^' S n N 1N m O O° 3 N d m�m •�OmT Rto. sn nn.. na a�C- 0 o m m v 7 r m nR y 3 0 (toN g 3pm NNpm] j]yWN m m m n R w R o 3 R c `° m^ » a33 13 a 2 0' 0 3 m N O`o 'apo otN� n o..o S m R � On3m $° K ^ •'Z J .Ji g 50M 0 N N O. J N O D C �' F m O" c � m m m u m' d m ; 3 n 3- 0 n o o S 3 ° - r ZD ootom°v Jy Ra 3C me m oaZ FS'cc.02 a� wmoaNF mm= epm fDev ocl �no� �e o� m'm^ -�� �J� N'< NatO BOO gZT C O V m CO w Q, •� m d .yo y'u14a �m o n - e o0 m 4nn N N N SmKx rn�p N `J�Dryo;o RJ 3nq 1o_•rt �. . aw n� RAy IIt n mog"C a� 95°' WTsry R�°g `RJ q m R o m 3 3 w r o a ^< N ;+ O mW m a o a R o om vmo'a va:> gom,o R no m m mm °< p a0 �$ 3 u C m Jz a ' O 3 mWyo � O Vyi o N M w m 13 J Z m .. O o ato.3 ;3 Rm mom= v4 pm °�' a rs Q SS T S G) O a z3O �� Ib' �� � �� �'� 4' � � m �+ � ;y fb .• °.!p � �.`C.c�l d S qi m L m a '�� o' =c., m'r 5.3 '3a3m N°dm-o'ba mm �:4oP ¢:m mm»ct°u .0m 3Fa -xmR as DZ3 ..cq9 ■ F m a'mo jn01 .QyaorcmNx dm 0'tqoac °=or x�amymS<I f�m,-Rrdm up1■�1,�i11�i m' ? oo'n3 �o� m��R•.nKc �, o^ u�!q.y< p-wf mya3 63W n0 mNN aR, a9'= 3,Z Sm " EL o' d m 2.m m owi `n O, < < q .P -+.n q •c, � c' ti 9{ }gi}p•p •c c 5. o mem g'"cc�PT3 m�gm3a•G�o moR�ir cmW F� Kq.y 5'mmxqwF °-'.i-oo �5 Sa s.m 1 3 C�m�ol C.. mJ -o dF• m °n�. vcQ waw °< F m. °•ao.�m oa0 ��3.a 6q, O m 'w R' � n R m n� n �•;° �Pr.,]� �i Y1111�{. -' ° °, p N ° o a. r n. •c 3 a l» � nu; m60 ft °�'='': an< Ror�mya9�ao�� 3�nar 3 bmn01ai�m�?: mL b b it a, rti R W 3 00i 3' K ^ .di C R.0 O Cc to n {-�' S m �I : naOio°'na m r n 0 l 0, is 4 mm mol $8s l3d`3rcm F 6c 3 3Fa 1.4 a'O igo m m < S$• SNK 30P < 3v oa Da Smj^-a'f.3 �m�o�a m m NRm 3 v3 J 3 '7 z^t0=u o-°' a°,•c 2 0 n Y (n] b 9 O .i' d S u 0 0 R y° m y O 6 g O D n Jm m •?; -0 m�. Fn- "S Jry ai�cF-' m N 3 m y ono .. n w m _8 no Ro c_i ITb S�" Su C1gy �m� j N�.-m. oB•e' n o n N a• a.., R,o,a `aa y S S J >>Fr Z'0 O m = m .1o.' m o nrewc°_'S�m�mn�m F m a , RmaW on�m�3'm v=d'3 0�aw <J1'z0 q. i0 '�6m1mW O.N� `a,O100 RR°nm `N 'Ij°300.^?�na'z3 a�m�YS cy,3a^,°oRm�2Lm o,'dmc "=�usio°.m'..c3 amoa'm3'<na a (n"'da nio a< 'm i0 .m<m'a O'O0�`•S m o:, m am o 0 'n y my OWtI+ o I' m �' g 0 ni 33 ;— yJm'Cmo3 myDr o N `J�Dryo;o RJ mdm3 aR a C�mmn 3m2 �. . aw n� RAy IIt n mog"C a� 95°' WTsry R�°g `RJ m JOa o m 3 3 w r o a MR D L m J << mW m a o a R o om vmo'a va:> gom,o pY W G) mm °< mm m� m' 0 'n y my OWtI+ o I' m �' g 0 ni 33 ;— yJm'Cmo3 myDr o m a, nm 0m Sac muga ry Z a C�mmn 3m2 Wma <�17 . aw n� RAy P J d mQ 060-4 95� oci3_s,3 m JOa o m 3 3 w r o a MR D L m J << mW m a o a R o om vmo'a va:> gom,o pY W 8p � to mdc O S 00 67C&nm o¢ o`m,3 �' '0 '0 ?yam' mWyo pm o' m a clo� .rW J m W n aLi0N ato.3 zON z N3 mom= v4 pm °�' m3 rnaa3 wro 3e iswaa 0c IOWA CITY RIVERFRONT COMMISSION CIVIC CENTER IOWA CITY, IOWA 52240 W m m c .m. n m'T NZmnCfi .O �•m 9ma c m o r M;!. � oo»Omm^ y' nZymg n� Wx q�mym St _.x -y_ O':''40DYRr D +� mo�3mON 3=M Coo mm mo mD3 t m aa55m a 0 n sR m9 amm ' m w m m m i=t co 0 ar �a m.Qen yqj a:,- ;s 31 �maa oaf, 3'�SR c C- R'.�,m ; a* R. m'yw 20 ao`° vdr`+'mF m�ao '. 4 b\S•� `mc m g, m �' b < t o m 3 3 w r o a q° Wmm r pY W 8p � to mdc O S 00 ?yam' u •e a o 1 =om r. ,I q - City of InIwya City MEMORANDUM DATE: October 1, 1976 TO: City Council FROM: City Manager RE: Development Adjacent to Scott Boulevard Several weeks ago dethe City Council discussed the influence which further velopment adjacent to Scott Boulevard will have upon sewer capacity on the east side. Since that time, the City Manager and the staff have reviewed sewer capacities and previous agreements. Enclosed is a report on this matter. This report represents the concensus of the Public Works Department, Community Development Department and the City Manager's office. The agenda of October 5 includes a public hearing concern- ing the rezoning of three parcels of land adjacent to Scott Boulevard. TO: FROM: RE: In Agreement: • 0 City of Iowan City MEMarRANDIUM Neal Berlin, City Manager Eugene Dietz, City Engine Sewer Criteria Relat of Scott Blvd. Don Schmeiser, Senior DATE: September 24, 1976 ve.lopment in the Vicinity The question being addressed is that of sanitary sewer capacity for the area adjacent to Scott Blvd, and how that capacity relates to zoning and further development. There is a lengthy history to the question, and that background information will be addressed first for the entire drainage area. In 1963, the City received a report on the sanitary sewerage system as compiled by Veenstra and Kimm, Constulant.s. In that report, various service areas were depicted and a course of action proposed to serve them. One such area (encompassing the area in question) .is a 1600 acre tract of land generally east of 1st Avenue, north of American Legion Road, and south of Rochester Avenue (see figure attached). The trunk line, called the southeast trunk sewer, was designed for a loading condition of eight (8) people per acre. It is with this assumption that problems arise. In fact, the majority of the tributary area within the City limits is presently zoned RIB, which would allow development to proceed at a rate approaching, 20 people per acre. The trend however, based on an average using the three subdivisions of Washington Park Part IX, Oakwoods Part VI, and Oakwoods Part VII, is approximately 14 peop'Le per acre. I believe it is fair to state that the area to date has developed at this rate, and that the trend would probably continue at 'least at this rate if more area were annexed and developed east of Scott Blvd. Presently, the entire 1600 acre drainage area has been developed to approximately 30% or 480 acres (see figure attached). At this point it is necessary to interject a judgement factor--i.e., the amount of sewage generated per person. Our design standards dictate this to be 350 gallons per capita per day (gcd) for any sewer line serving single family homes. Depending on which text or individual consulted, there is a wide variety of opinions stating that this assumption may be conservative for application to a trunk sewer. The primary discrepancy being how much infiltration to consider. On the eve of a multimillion dollar improvement to our sewerage treatment facilities to eliminate problems arising from infiltration, I would be extremely hesitant to lower this figure. Therefore, using 14 people per acre and 350 gcd applied to the presently developed 480 acres results in a sewage load . ., ., Berlin/Dietz • September 24, 1976 Page 2 of 2.31 million gallons per day (MGD). The southeast trunk sewer was, designed to receive 4.5 MGD from the entire 1600 acre tract. The net result is that, to date, 30% of the drainage area uses approximately 51% of the available sewer capacity. Although there are other opinions that would speculate on these percentages being exact, I believe it is fair to assume that the area has developed at a rate that the sewer capacity. No particular problems exceeds exist at present, due to this development rate, but at some point in time it is necessary that the City take one of two approaches. Either A) Allow development to proceed at its present rate and recognize that not all of the potential service area can be incorporated into the City and developed, or B) develop would at a density rate compatible with the remaining sewage capacity, which ontruc costs, b per I susapproximately persons gross pectdeveloperswouldfind itdifficult atebestGtoslivetion within the confines of alternate B. The immediate question at hand is that area adjacent. to Scott Blvd., presently owned by Bruce Glasgow. The two questions are; to service the area with sewer and, 2) 1) How The effect of a rezoning of a Portion of the property. It is my understanding that approximately 20 acres of the Glasgow property is zoned R3A. Under consideration is a rezoning of approximately one additional acre to R3A. From the above discission concerning sewage capacity, the effect of a high density area would appear to be self evident. R3A zoning has the potential, if not the Irobability, of being developed to 43.5 units per acre. The planning division has done research on the subject of the number of people per dwelling unit. Whereas the preceding discussion was based on single family development using 3.96 people per unit, apartments. have been found to house 1.99 people per unit. Although no development has occurred with a density this high, R3A has a potential density of 87 people per gross acre. Experience has shown that sewage generated per capita in apartment units is less than that of single family homes (287 gcd as compared to 350 gcd by Iowa City Standards is that R3A zoning has a potential of generating 5 times theeseend wageeaslt the present trend of development and actually 9 times the capacity as strrictly in termsed in the oofheast trunk potentials,sforrevverygacre people per toSpeakin,g its maximum, 9 acres of the total 1600 acre tributary area must be deleted. Even supposing my assumptions are in error by a factor of two the implications are still clear. , I believe The question of providing sanitary service to the Scott Blvd. area also has a history behind it. At present the southeast trunk nearly extends to Scott Blvd, at the south branch of Ralston Creek (see figure attached). Due to the rugged terrain between the creek and Court Street, it.has long been recognized the cost of servicing the area north of Court Street would be high without first extending the trunk sewer east. There is however, a sewer ending at Scott Blvd., tributary to the trunk line, just south of Court Street that has a limited capacity remaining. This existing sewer serves the neighborhood adjacent to Friendship Street, Shamrock Dr,, and the Arbor Drive area. The critical section of the sewer is at the c i Berlin/Dietz September 24, 1976 Pane 3. intersection of Arbor Drive and Friendship Street. In 1973 3to cthe City Council adopted a resolution establishing a tapping the problem and allow further development along Scott Blvd. Attached is a copy of that resolution for your reference. Basically, the existing capacity of the sewer could resolution indicates that the serve 55 acres of single family development, and the tapping fee would generate enough revenue to pay for an Arbor Drive relief sewer which would ultimately Theserve 85 fallacyres of of thesplan isathat therfmile (less if a higher density). are 110 acres of land lying immediately adjacent to Scott Blvd, rved if the capacity were there. Furthermore, that could be seline the proposed route of the relief sewer was down the back Y of the homes on the west side of Arbor Drive'between Friendship and the creek. Today, since no easements exist for this route, the majority of the $20,000 budget would have to be used for easement. aquisition and restoration. I have discussed this situation with Bruce Glasgow at length, and I wouldvnotebeoadvantageousetootherCity orcnstuction otoatheArbor developmentrelief theewe�C he ost warea. Tnttivey, we aree that ould bee toaworkltowardsgextending tthe msoutheast btrunk le tsewer. of all In my opinion, the most desirable way to pursue this would be to extend the this would firs', n potent. 1 hardshiptodevelopmentof development. Therefore, my recommendations as to the parameters of an agreement to facilitate this scheme would be: 1. Allow the construction of a sewer in Scott Blvd. to be connected to the existing Friendship St. sewer, but at an elevation such that it could be eventually dis- connected and re-routed to an extension of the trunk line; 2. Under no circumstances could more thanr0.5ged tosthehexisting existing available capacity) be system. The amount of tributary land would depend on the density of the development; ion of his 3 theodeveloperwestablish rantaccount tthat swould require that cover the cost of the extension of the trunk and connecting sewer. The dollar amount of the account should be large enough to include the purchase of easements not in effect at the time of the agreement, engineering costs, and inflation to some date certain; 4. At some date certain, the account would revert to the City for construction of the trunk sewer and connecting link (perhaps 18 to 24 months); S. Co -signature by the developer anof d a City Official for xelestlse ccurred the funds uless efalt which release ofthe�Jn fudsnta theuC!'ty; Berlin/Dietz • • September 24, 1976 Page 4 6. The account need not bear interest to the City but rather to the developer; 7. Install target dates such as - when engineering pians of the sewer are to be presented for the City to review, etc., which if defaulted would also release the money to the City for implementation of the plan; and Establish a tapping fee after construction of the trunk sewer extension to reimburse the developer for other than his pro -rata share of the cost. In summary, the City will find it necessary to decide on a plan of action based on the availability of sewer in the area. Either a limited growth policy must be adopted and allow development to occur as desired or take an expansion attitude and limit the density of development to allow as much of the remainder of the 1600 acres to become incorporated into the City as possible. I would prefer the development to come after extension of proper sewer service. However, if this method proves un- desirable, an agreement to allow development ill steps could be worked out with the City not participating in development costs. cc: Planning F, Zoning Commission Frank Farmer Don Schmeiser v � • RESOLUTION NO. 73-17 RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING TAPPING FEE FOR ARBOR DRIVE RELIEF SEWER WHEREAS, it is proposed that the watershed lying north of, north the intersection the intersection of Scott Blvd. and Court Street, and, lying deveell of Friendship Street and Court Street sewer network by the constoped without exceeding the capacity of the sanitary seruction of the Arbor Drive Relief Sewer. WHEREAS it is given that not more than a total of 60 acres Of single family dwellings, or the equivalent as determined by the City Engineer, can be served either directly or indirectly by the existing sanitary sewer network. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that a tapping fee.in the amount Of $150.00 per acres be established for the construction of the Arbor Drive Relief Sewer, to be paid to the City Clerk, by any person, firm or corporation desiring to be served either directly or indirectly by the sewers located at 'the aforementioned locations. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that any person, firm poration desiring to serve either directly or indirectlyor ancor- y parcel which exceeds the 55 acre aggregate at the aforementioned loca- tions shall pay to the City Clerk an amount of $20,000 amount of Arbor Drive Relief Sewer tapping fees previousllyess the collected by the City. The Arbor Drive Relief Sewer will then be constructed by the City with these funds as soon as practicable, but prior to the construction of any development in excess of the 60 acre by limitation. The person, firm or corporation will be reimbursed by thany e future Arbor Drive Relief Sewer tapping fees collected NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that after the construction of the Arbor Drive Relief Sewer not more than 85 acres of single family dwellings or the equivalent as determined by the City Engineer shall be served either directly or indirectly by the Sanitary Sewer at Scott Blvd. and Court Street; and not more than 55 acres of single family dwellings or the equiv.3lent as determined by the City Engineer, shall be served either directly or indirectly by the sanitary sewer at Friendship Street and Court Street. It was moved by Connell and seconded by Czarnecki that the Resolution as read be adopted and upon roll call there were: AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: x x x x X Passed and adopted this 16 ATTEST: City Clem + Brandt Connell Czarnecki Hickerson White day of January, 1973. M,. yor i nlF F"PAAPp a AREA NO. 11 20,000 ACRES CRES EM7,77, I m j -Au;---- rrunk a AREA NO. 11 20,000 ACRES CRES EM7,77, I m j City of Iowa City MEMORANDUPW DATE: October 1, 1976 TO: City Council FROM: City Manager RE: Revenue Sharing Bill Word was received from Congressman bfezvinsky's office that the Revenue Sharing Bill passed the Conference Committee earlier this week. Basically, the House version of the Bill was retained. The program is funded for three and three-fourths years. The :First year entitlement is approximately $6.65 billion; the second year $6.85 billion; and the last year and three-fourths if $6,85 billion. Citizen participation requires two public hearings as to suggested uses of the funds. A public hearing on planned use report is required at least seven days before the report is published in the local newspaper, and a public hearing on Revenue Sharing expenditures is required at least seven days prior to the adoption of the budget. Where State and local laws require auditing provisions, the same requirements will apply to revenue sharing. Where no audit is required, an independent audit is required every three years. No audit is required for cities receiving less than $25,000 annually. /727 46ity of Iowa cit* MEMORANDUM �..: DATE: September 21, 1976 T0: City Council FROM: City Manager RE: Audit In recent years, the annual financial report of the City has been presented formally to the City Council by the Director of Finance. While this report is primarily prepared by the Department of Finance staff, it does represent the independent audit of the City's finances as conducted by McGladrey, Hansen, Dunn $ Company. Therefore, I believe it is appropriate for the auditing firm to make the formal presentation to the City Council. This procedure is consistent with a checks and balances policy. At the informal council session on October 11, the presentation will be made by Mr. David Johansen of McGladrey, Hansen, Dunn F, Company. This procedure will be followed in future years. cc: Pat Strabala CRY Of Iowa Cie: MEMORANDUM DATE: September 29, 1976 TO: City Council FROM: Julie Vann, CDBG Program Coordinator q—" U: Monday Council Housing Rehab Discussion On Monday., October 4th, Mike Kucharzak of Rehab Consultants andI will resent two p of the financing packages for the Housing Rehabilitation Program the rehabilitation property standards. and a definition of Attached you will find the corresponding chapters of the Rehabilitation Financimg Handbook. JV/ssw Attachment it 7.29 i 4,CHAPTER 1. CHAPTER 2. CHAPTER 3. CHAPTER 4. 4 CHAPTER 5. X'CHAPTER 6. -KCHAPTER 7. CHAPTER 10. CHAPTER 11. CHAPTER 12. CHAPTER 13. CHAPTER 14. CHAPTER 15. CHAPTER 16. CHAPTER 17. CHAPTER 18. CHAPTER 19. CHAPTER 20. CHAPTER 21. CHAPTER 22. 0 OF CONTENTS Rehabilitation Financing Handbook GENERAL PROTECT FINANCING AM) ELIGIBLE PROJECT COSTS ELIGIBILITY REQUIRDINTS ASSURANCE THAT REHABILITATION WILL BE COMPLETED COSTS INCLUDABLE IN REHABILITATION GRANT AND LOAN ---7 Section 1. Costs Includable in a Rehabilitation Grant Section 2. Costs Includable in a Rehabilitation Loan LIMITATION ON AMOUNT OF GRANT LIMITATIONS ON AMOUNT OF LOAN --Section 1. Forgivable Loan Section 2. No Interest Loan Section 3. Low Interest Rehabilitation Loan 7 Appendix 1. Promissory Note - Forgivable Loan RESERVED. PROCESSING AND SUBMISSIONS FOR REHABILITATION GRANT —Appendix 2. Guide Form of Letter to Applicant Canceling Rehabilitation Grant PROCESSING AND SUBMISSIONS FOR A REHABILITATION LOAN LOAN SETTLEKENT LOAN CLOSEOUT TERMS AND CONDITIONS UNDER WHICH REHABILITATION GRANTS AND LOANS ARE MADE FUNDING OF INDIVIDUAL REHABILITATION GRANTS AND LOANS AND MANAGEMENT OF REHABILITATION ESCROW ACCOUNT RESERVED NUMBERING GRANT AND LOAN APPLICATIONS RESERVED DETERMINING WORK TO BE DONE WITH REHABILITATION GRANT AND LOAN CONTRACTING FOR REHABILITATION M)RK INSPECTION OF REHABILITATION WORK RESERVED APPLICANT'S INCCME RehaBiZtitation FfjtanciV ganaook CHAPTER 1, GENBAI, 1. LEGAL AUTHORITY FOR REHABILITATION GRANTS AND LOANS. Rehabilitation grants and loans to rehabilitation residen rehabilitatiotial structures located in certain concentrated n areas are authorized by under the Housing and Commty Council utilizing Title I assistance . munity Development Act of 1474, as amended. 2. DEFINITIONS. Following are definitions of various Terms as used with re to re a ihtation grants and rehabilitation loans: spect a. Investor -Owner Pro ertz. A property used entirely for residential purposes t at is ei wer: 1 not occupied by the owner, or (2) contains three or more dwelling units whether or not occupied by the owner. b. Owner -Occupied Pro ertr/. A property occupied by the owner that is used entirely for residential purposes and that contains one or two dwelling units. c. Rehabilitation Standards. .j In Concentrated Rehabilitation Area. Requirements of the Minimum Housing. Stan ards apter 4.30 0 e Municipal Code and any property rehabilfitation requirements, established in an Urban Renewal -1--m adopted by the City of Iowa City which is applicable to the properties to remain ir4 i;he prosect ' area. d. Rehabilitation Cost. The total cost of repairs and an costs for rera �1 ration to be incurred by the applicant othat area includable in a rehabilitation grant and/or loan, whether or nj funds from other sources (see Chapter 5). ot financed in pari with e. Rehabilitation Construction eciaZist. An employee of the City's ➢apartment it o Community Development arge w,it the duties of administrating the physic4l aspects of rehabilitation, including sunreying, cost estimating, spetification.,, writing, owner and contractor guidance, public information, and,constitiotion compliance review. f. Rehabilitation FiiuznciaZ_S ecialist. An employee of the City's ➢epartrgzent o Community Development rgec with the, duties of administrating the financial aspects o:E rehabilitation, including interviewing, e2sgibilify determination testing, verification, loan or grant application ;process:i.ng, loan closing, escrow management, and final disposition accounting. g. Owner. Means one or more natural persons who hold legal title to a property to be rehabilitated. h.Incipient Violation. An element of the structure required or contained in zne Minumrm Housing Standards, that at the time of inspection it found to be in such a state of deterioration that if l'ef't uncorrected, will further deteriorate into an actual violation in the near future. 1-1 hoehahilitation Financing Handbook i. ponily. The applicant's family includes the applicant and any,other person or persons related by blood, marriage or operation of law, who share the same dwelling unit. j. Rehabilitation Review Board. An administrative board compris�l of the; Director of a Deparbnent of Community Development, the Rehab;�litatioa Financial Specialist, and the Rehabilitation Construction Specialist yhose function shall be to review and approve or disapprove applications fox City loans according to the procedures as set forth herein. 1-2 Rehabilitation Financing.HanA. 0ok CHAPTER 5. COST INCLUDABLE IN MHADILITAT'ION GRANTS AND LOANS SECTION 1. COSTS INCLUDABLE IN REHABILITATION GRANT -u 1. GENERAL. A rehabilitation grant may be made only to cover the cost, of rehabili- tation necessary to make an owner -occupied one- or two dwelling unit residential property conform to standards for safe, decent, and sanitary housing as spi'Icificallyl required by the Rehabilitation Standards, and other costs as provi:9� in tjis .1i section. As a result of the rehabilitation work financed, in whole.or in Bart by ,•p a rehabilitation grant, the property must., at a minimum, conform to, the Rehabili- tation Standards. Rehabilitation grant funds shall be used to achieve economical, and practical compliance with the Rehabilitation Standards. 2. INCLUDABLE COSTS. Costs includable in a rehabilitation grant are the cost$ of: meeting the requirements of the Rehabilitation Standards; correcting incipient violations (if permitted, see Chapter 6); and building permits and j�elated fees as described below: a. Requirement of Code. When necessary to meet a specific requirement of the Q1 11 1 Re ami 6ilit t on Standards, a rehabilitation grant may be used, to the extent necessary for: ;I (1) The rehabilitation or removal of elements of the dwelling structure, including basic equipment, and of other improvements to the proPerty such as garages, fences, steps, walkways, anddriveways. The tejtn "basic equipment" includes such items as heating furnace, eater heater, and electrical and sanitary fixtures. (2) The provision of sanitary or other facilities, including the provision, II expansion and finishing of space necessary to accommodate those facilities. r (3) The provision of additional or enlarged bedrooms, if required by the Rehabilitation Standards. (4) Grading, filling, or landscaping of the grounds, if required by the Rehabilitation Standards. b. Energgy Conservation Measures. A rehabilitation grant may provide for specific energy conservation measures such as storm windows, caulking and weather- stripping, and attic and wall mnsulation. C. Fire Protection Devices. A rehabilitation grant may be used for, the ip$talla- SII tion of early warning fire alarm devices such as smoke detectors, d. Inti ient Violations. In order that a property may be brought up to and maintained at the Rehabilitation Standards level, a rehabilitation.grant•may be used for rehabilitation work necessary •ta. correct incipient as well as I. actual violations of the Rehabilitation Standards. An incipient; -violation IIS 5-1 I � 3 Rehabilitation Financing yandbpojy exists, if, at the time of inspection, it is thought that the physical condition of an element in the structure will deteriorate into an actual violation in the near future (such as within a year or two). (1) Examples of Different Type of Incipient Violations. (a) A furnace may be expected soon to became inoperative or hazardous because of its age, condition or use. A rehabilitationgrant'r�ay provide for the replacement of the entire furnace. (b) A roof has one or more small leaks that can be patched at lows cost, but the roof probably will continue to develop leaks. A; rehabilitation grant could provide for replacing the entire roof, (2) Reporting Requirements. The property inspection report should identify the incipient -violations to establish the basis for providing for corrective work in the grant. For enforcement purposes, itis necessary for actual -violations to be identified and listed separately from incipient -violations. However, the amount of rehabilitation grant to be made may cover both actual and incipient violations. (3) Limitson Inc' ient Vsolationr Correction. Property owners eligible .for t e re ilitation grant may receiveitional monies for irtcipieh:C violation correction not in excess of 25$. of the estimated (and veritfied) cost of correcting active Rehabilitation Standards, energy conservation measures, and fire protection devices (i.e., if a structure required) $4,000 to correct active Rehabilitation Standards violations;; energy conservation measures and fire protection devices and if the owner qualified for the grant, not more than 25% or $1,000 could be, grante;i for incipient correction). e. Buildin Permits and Related Fees. A rehabilitation grant may provide funds to cover the costo building permits and rotated fees that are required to carry out the proposed rehabilitation work.. However, since the constiiiction, contract documents will require the contractor to pay for them, this cost ordinarily would be included in the contract amount (see Chapter 19). COSTS NOT INCLUDABLE. Except as otherwise provided in this section, a,rehabilita- tion grant shall not provide for: a. New construction, substantial reconstruction, expansion of the structure,:or the finishing of unfinished spaces. b. Materials, fixtures, equipment, or landscaping of a type or quality which exceeds that customarily used in the locality for properties of the same general type as the property to be rehabilitation. c. Appliances not requiredby the Rehabilitation Standards. d. Acquisition of land. 5-2 Rehabilitation Fina,, .ctV VandliiN $ 4. WORK WRITE- • i UPI The Rehabilitation tation Construction Specialist shall prepare e a write-up in accordance with Chapter 18, financed with a rehabilitation grant, to do p P wok cement the rehabilitation work tl�� b i i 'i ,I ail .q `I hl 5-3 i Rehabilitation Finarncing ,handbook CHAPTER 6. REHABILITATION GRANT j 1, GENWfA4. This douunent sets forth the eligibility requirements in regards to t141 property and the applicant for a housing IMUILITMON grant. REHABILITATION GRANTS are available only in the REHABILITATION AREAS designated ' by the City Council. The property must be in need of repairs which are necessaryl to meet the Minimum Housing Standards requirements. 2. APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY. To be considered for a REHABILITATION grant, the applicant must be in compliance with the following criteria: a. The applicant must be the owner -occupant of a 1 or 2 dwelling unit structure' that is all residential in character andis within the City Council.designated REHABILITATION AREA, or b. The applicant must be a purchaser -occupant of a 1-2 family all residential dwelling under a land sales contract in effect for at least ,twelve months, and is within the City Council designated REHABILITATION AREA. c. The applicant must meet the following Financial qualifications: (1) [lave Liquid Assets not in excess of. $10,000 for a 1 person household 15,000 for a 2 person household 20,000 for a 3 or more person household (2) Monthly Income Considerations (a) We would collect and report the following gross monthly intone data: (1) Base pay for Head of Household, spouse, other family members,' j (2) Any other earnings (other jobs, etc.) (3) Net income from property being rehabilitated (gross income minus operating expenses): (4) Any other income source (interest, etc,) (5) Income from social security, pension, annuitites, general relief, ADC. (b) We would then adjust downward the income of the h(�Usehold by ucting: � i'' (1) 10% of 2a-1 through 4 above for Federal, State and local tax!. and (2) 25% of 2a-5 above for fixed income consideration. j jl (3) $25 for each child under 18 years of age or ;i full time studopt dependent residing in the home to be rehabilitated. 6-1 �� Rehabilitation Financing,Handbook; (3) Maximum Income. Have an adjusted many income for the household (See Chapter 22) which does .not exceed: $5,000 for a 1 person household 5,700 for a 2 person household 6,400 for a 3 person household 7,100 for a 4 person household 7,700 for a 5 person household 8,200 for a 6 person household 8,800 for a 7 person household 9,400 for an 8+ person household 3. LIMITATION ON THE AMOUNT OF GRANT. The amount of a rehabilitation grant that aqli , applicant may receive shall be limited by the following: For an applicant whose income and liquid assets are in accord with the establis!,jrd. formulas, the grant amount shall not exceed the lesser of: (1) The actual (and approved) cost of the repairs necessary to make the property, conform to the Rehabilitation Standards for safe, decent and sanitary housing, energy conservation measures, fire protection devices, and 'permitted incipients. The amount shall be established in accordance with Chapter 18. (2) $5,000 IN 6-Z 1. 2. Rehabilitation Finanain6 4anaoA SECTION 1. FORGIVABLE LOAN GENERAL. This section sets forth the eligibility in regards to the property and tt eTi —applicant for a housing rehabilitation forgivable loan. Forgivable Loans are available only in conjunction with Rehab3liepairs Grant to the elderly and handicapped. The Property must be in need of repai,,rs which are necessary meet Rehabilitation Standards, in excess of the maximum Basic Grant amount APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY. To be const with the follow000- bilicTiteriaon �rgivai�le.Loan, n$ t e applicant mus -t �e in come unit structure 'Which is; a• Be the owner -occupant of a single family dwelling Council Who is: in the Rehabilitation area designated by the City (1) 60 years of age or older; or (2) receiving Social Security Disability benefits. b. Be eligible for the Rehabilitation determined on the basis Of income and asset limitations. (see Chapter c. The homestead must require more than the $5„000 grant ceiling totmeet minimum rehabilitation standards. 3, ASSURANCE THAT RERABILZTATION WILL BE COMPLETED.ed the amount of a iorgivablej 4. a, In some instances the rehabilitation cost may exce loan and grant. In such cases a,rehabilitati. grant and addi+table l4mo {j applicant can provide whatever additional ainormt I will not be made unless the app Will meet is needed to assure completion Of the work so that the property at least the Rehabilitation Standards. is obtaining a b. If the applicant for a forgivable loan on residential Property ai roved until the staff has secured, evidence that the applicant has obtained supplemental loan, the rehabilitation grant anis loan app ration shall not e app supplemental loan commitment. an adequate and satisfactory supe that .11 j LIMITATIONS ON AMOUNT OF FORGIVABLE LOAN'. The amount of a forgivable loan applicant may receive shall be limited by the following' uroved) construction costs minus the a. The difference between the actual (and apI j $5,000 rehabilitation grant. li b, $S,000- 7-1 RehabilitatiO4 Fi:- 40-: ng Ran4j5 . k S. TERMS AND CONDITIONS. a. Forgivable loans shall be secured by a lien against the Property. b. Amortization. (I) If the rehabilitated property is sold or transfers Ownershi the first year anniversary of the loan, 100$ of the loan principal prior t;c be called due, p incipal Shall (2) If the rehabilitated property is sold or transfers Ownership prior tia the second year anniversary of the loan, 50% of the l amount shall be called due. The remaining 50$ is oan principal forgiven. 4 (3) If the rehabilitated property is sold or transfers ownership ' the third year anniversary, 25% of the loan principal amount shall be', called due. The remaining 75% is forgiven. Any or transfer after the third (4) 100% Ofethe loan principal amount would be anniversary orgiven would mean that. 100% c. Penalties. In the event the forgivable loan recipient(s) fail to pay, reofp hen Principal, become due and payablewat the eOptionthe woflthe rlien al, Mgijnt o ut notice. The forgivable loan recipient(s)P ?pal aer wi of till, Pay attorney's :Fees. � ease of suit thereon !agrees tc� I i • 6 APPENDIX 1. PROMISSORY NOTE REHABILITATION GR'ANP DATE: CASE NUMBER: Rehabilitation F2naneing PLACE: For value received, the undersigned jointly and severally promise(s) to pay to the order of the City of Iowa City acting by and througri the Director, Department. of Community Development the sum of The full Principal on this Note is paya le on tie a 11a trans er o e property prici to the first year anniversary of this Note. Sale transfer of'the property .prior. to the second year anniversary of this Note would require 50% of"the Prdncipal to. be called due. The remaining 50% would be forgiven. Sale transfer of ,the property prior to the third year anniversary of this Note would require 25% of the Principal to be called due. The remaining 75% shall be forgiven. After the third anniversary date of this Note 100% of the Principal will be forgiven. Also, any sale transfer resulting from the death or illness of one or more of the undersigned imuldl,mean 100% of the Principal will be forgiven. In the event the undersigned shall fail to pay the Principal, or a portion thereof, when due, the whole amount then unpaid shall become due and payable at the option of the holder without notice. The undersigned, in case of suit hereon,, agrees to pay attorney's fees. All. Endorsers agree to all of the provisions.of this Note, and consent to the times of payment of all or any Bart hereof. In witness whereof, this Note has been date. duly execa.ited by the undersigned, as of this � I 7-3 Rehabilitation Pin4,ncivg Randbo' CHAPTER 9. PROCESSING AND SUSNISSIONS FOR REHABILITATI0I4 GRAM`, 1. GENERAL. This chapter contains an outline of the functions to be performed bir the Stoma f- in connection with a rehabilitation grant, and sets forvi the;pbl cies and procedures to be followed by the Staff in preparing, process, and approvappling an, ggrant.ation for a rehabilitation grant, and in canceling an approved rehabil#!!tion, rant. ,i 2. OUTLINE OF STAFF FUNCTIONS. Listed below are the functions to be performed by t e Sta in connection with a rehabilitation,grant. As applicable to each of the listed functions, cross-references are given to other chapters that contalIri . the substantive requirements with respect to that function. Items a.,, b., c.,;ana d. are required, regardless of the source of funds to be used to finance the cgot' of rehabilitation. Items e. through y. apply to a rehabilitation grant supplemented by a rehabilitation loan are included in Chapter 10. i Functions Cros,g-Reference a. Interview and advise applicant on the general. rehabilitation objectives of the project,.and the purpose and meaning of the Rehabilitation Standards, b. Advise the applicant on the availability and benefits of a rehabilitation grant and other City and private programs and resources for financing rehabilitation. C. Inspect the property. Chapter 18 LI d, Prepare a work write-up and cost estimate of the rehabilitation work needed to meet the Rehaibili- tation Standards. it Chapter 18 e. Determine eligibility of the applicant for a Chapter " it rehabilitation grant, p Evidence that ownership of the property has; been verified and shall be retained in the property files. This shall include the citation from the land records or other official record from which the verification was made. If applicant is occupant -purchaser under a land sales contract, obtain a documentation to support eligibility. Chapter 3 9-1 Rehabilitatign Financing Rani' ook . &nc--- tions 'i f• Verify applicant's income, Gro— s-- s-Re. ?knee and assets. housing expense. 9. Determine that work items in Chapter work writ conform to purposes for which grant can be used. rehabilie-ups tation h. Establish amount ofr Chapter 'S g ant applicant .may receive. i• Be assured Chapter 6 that as a result of the rehabilitation grant, the property will be rehabil'itateii at a minimum to meet the Rehabilitation St:andgnds, If the rehabilitationr by a rehabilitation loans. is to be supplemented 'j J • If thea or, and need rehabilitationnloan Chapter 10 ,esims a ' application. asist hin fi:Ling and i k. Advise thea pplicant of the conditions: under which a rehabilitation Chapter 10 grant is made. I. obtain cprepare construction contract documents Chapter 13 and ontractor's proposals for rehal5ilitation work and review proposals received. m• Prepare Form CDR-6260 Rehabilitation Grant, (original Chapter 19 li and 1 co Signature. P3) and obtain applicant's !i n• Approve Form CDR-6260, if all requirements i, are met. 0- Assign Form CDR-6260ation and allber relateddoter on approved, PP geed. cements. � r P• Prepare promissary note for Chapter 16 loan lien if applicable. Obtain legal opinion and recordation. q• Prepare rovproject check to applicant for amount of approved rehabilitation grant, obtain applicaUtt's endorsement, and deposit check for rehabilitation grant in escrow account. r. Assist a applicant in execution Ghapter'14 contract, and deliver to selectof construction ed contractor. s• Assist a Chapter lg construction akin issuing proceed order for t. Inspect rehabilitation as itli progresses. Chapter ZO i ... 9-2 I 0 Funotions u. Make final inspection of completed rehabilitation work. V. Issue Form CDR -6245. 0 Rehabilitation w. Obtain from contractor guarantee of work, manufacturers' and suppliers' warranties, andrelease of liens from general contractor, sub- contractors, and suppliers prior to final payment for rehabilitation work,. x. Prepare Statement of Disposition of Funds. Y. Closeout rehabilitation escrow. z. Make follow-up inspection. Cross, -Re erghce Chapter 20 Chapter 20 Chapter 14 Chapter 20 3. PROCESSING AND APPROVAL OF GRANT APPLICATION. Processing by the Staff of an application far a re a ilitation grant consists of the completion o> the functions listed below, items a, through c.,,assembly in one file of tir Form CDR -6260 and all supporting docwnents, and the review of the file to determine approval a. Preparation of Form. The Rehabilitation Finance Specialist shall prepare Form CDR -6260 (original and 1 copy) for the applicant„ based on information furnished by the applicant and obtained by the Rehabilitation Finance SpeciaL, ist from other sources, as documented in the file. Every space provided for an entry on Form CDR -6260 shall be completed. Entries of money amounts shall be made rounded to the nearest dol:tar. I£ no money is involved for an entry for a particular application; the entry shall be "none's. 12evi;ew and approval by the Rehabilitation Findnce'Specialist of Form CDR; -6260 "hall be based on the form completed in this manner. ;j. . b. a rehabilitation grant is w—it sales contract or similar arra to support the requirements in; r. Contract. If an, application. for 'to an loccupant-vendee under a ,land the file shall contain. documentation 3. C. AeprovaZ of AppZiaation for Grant. The Rehabilitation Finance Specialist shall approve a Farm CDR -6260 by obtaining the applicant's signature,;in block I, and by signing block j, on both the original and theicopy of the form. If the rehabilitation grant alone is sufficient to rehabilitate the property, or if the rehabilitation grant is to be supplemented by funds other than a rehabilitation loan and the Rehabilitation Finance Specialist is assured that the property will be rehalhilitated to meet the Rehabilitat: Standards (see Chapter 4), the rehabilitati,on,grdnt is considered to be approved, and the Rehabilitation Finance Specialist may notiflr the applic-u and proceed with the remainder of the functions for which it is respbinsibD in order to complete the rehabilitation work. 9-3 0 Rehabilit-#do Firlti +i n9. Rcn� �C (1) If a rehabilitation loan, t e grant s al ant is to ;be s lemented b tTlender of not ,e: const er a reh,abilitat;iipn consist of a the r of' for a rehabPlita into ter app��oval by letter ofcommitment (either from o an approval ;ihail sources), In this case, the Rehabilitation Fyne Ci advise the applicant concerning'or Privae,c Is te nor proceed with approval of thearehaiiil tatyon shy 1, not Of loan f any of the rehabilitation work i' ands has been received, mtil %?a t, tie reserve yon . (2) If the, Rehabilitation F' cannot e a mance S ecialist determines that rov ; a written staL,'ement o t A Form Ci) -6266 F, s all be put in the ,a F 6260 Finance S e xeasons or t e Specialist. pp Pplication file, by the,Regned bt tion Rehabilitation Finance Specialistot na b umber shall n?t be a$signed b' approve. Form CDR-6250 it does the' d. The Rehabilitation Financenot ' Note for Rehabilitation r Specialist s1ia1I complete original ant original plus two CDP -6261 ��l omissozyr plus one copy to City Attorneys office and shall.trannyt Attorney shall render a dor opinyon. the Promisso written legal op .5 q cy of Opinion 1'%' note, shall record sameregarding the ado ua Specialist. the copies of the promisso d the tyro gop1eS of his ry note to the Rehabilitation FintI The Rehabilitation Finance Specialist shall retain one c Plus a copy of thepromissory of the promissory dthe note in thea l� °f the opinio ry note and the legal Opinion be file. The: other co��� e Re aired -Submissions. £°rivarled to the not to a For an rehab _at ant a rehabilitation grant that' �s�, S supplemented by a rehflbilitatio?i loan pecialist pranptly shall send the completed approved SGS to: hilitation F" — of Fornq CDR -620q Accounting Section { Department of Community Development The ori y p aeh% 1 of the completed approved Fo abilitation Finance Specialist with the SuCDR-6260'shall'be retained by t'e pplication file, P � With the exception of the suubmission of dorm the above address at the time of .the co document Do -62. the there are no other r for 10n of CDij`6245 to not supplemented b required submissions the rehabilitation work for rehabilitation grant that iso y a rehabilitation to:in. For an application for a rehabilitation grant that is to be a loan, the completed original " the Form CDR -6230 submitted and the CO of Form supplemented by i Lender see Rehabilitation rF nonce sQ'shall accompany) ( Chapter lo), y the Rehabilitation Finance S picialis2 to:the 4• GRANT CANCELLATION. An approved because the applicant has requested ,r proceed with the rehabilitation work grant may need to be cancelled equested cancellation or is unwilling or unable to or for othF:r reasons, MI C� Rehabilitation Pi n4mcing E2mdbook a. Cancellation Letter. To cancel an approved rehabilitation ; . tation Finance Specialist shall prepare a letter in accordancanw,th gppeaix�� and distribute the letter as follows; (1) Original to applicant. (2) One copy to the property application file. (3) For grant only cases, one copy to; Accounting Department j' City of Iowa City, b. Return of Funda. If funds for the canceled rehabilitation grant have been Speci deposited to the rehabilitation escrow account, the Rehabilitation Finance alist shall draw a check on that account for the amount oiiginally deposited, payable to the source from which the funds were obtained. 9-5 Rehabilitation financing Randbook APPENDIX 2. GUIDE FORM OF LETTER TO APPLICANT CANCELING REHABILITATIQI GRANT (Date) (Name, Address and Zip of Applicant) 'j Re: Rehabilitation Grant $ { Application Nanber _ Date of Approval _ Dear Please be advised that the Rehabilitation Grant identified above has been canceled effective this date, for the following reason(s): Sincerely, • I I'� I. Reha Zitatign Financing Hand%,k is 1• GENERAL, This chapter sets forth the or t e purposes of a rehabilitation basis for establishing,an a , and takes into account t}�e variations applicable to different :residential p s xpcane grant and/or loan fe a residenpial.prope;lty, and Properties, and special considerations related to 'the t"t of project ica4 in which the property is located, tope of project ariu�ts' 2• TYPE OF APPLICANT; In order to make determinations with re for a ect to rehabilitation grant and the purposes and amount of arehab ltaelitionllt n t propert is identified, as either an owner••occupant of a a,�e-or tWo,dwe113:! - unit property or an investors either For off' income, an applicant must be identified additionally, determinan , other legal entity, as defined below, g an aPPlicantmI Y, either is a person or ;I a. le8 itlneto, o "ooceccupy means one d more natural persdns rano either hGil'd rehabilitated, occupy under a land sates contract a pi operty� to be j b•than aLeaqZ iThe term "other legal emit " ;i person , such as a partnership or co Y means all legal. entity iijk}ypr to a property to be rehabilitated. p ,,, ration tha of this definition is also "other X holds legal titjll- ?t- others legal, entity" within the mei,[. an inuestor-owner, 's' 3. SOURCES OF FUNDS AND AMOUNTS COh(PRISING APPLICANT'S INCOME. listing o t e elements comprls ---- and/or loan. ang Income or u The following is a Exclusions from income a P ?•poses o a rehabilitatiorj granfi stated in paragraph 5 below, applicable in special circumstances are a. Portion o Income Derived r f -- _ ___ �qm Re�xtal Units, p p more t an one we11m _ If the propert income that is du g unit a,ter re a xl.itation j' will.tontain block C rived from the property shall .be reportedan Of a�Rp6260 tt's 'k line 3, as a net figure determined as follows; �1) Net Income, ill I' �'op----erty to ben rehabilitated:income s the gross rethe rental ntalsln e�' Z Sl'x allocable to the rental units, pied payments, on the basis of These allocable expend i aresincluding ecpedzture,t or land contract principal andverrageof, two or mot u!clug gg service char Years for m,'prt a e charges hazard mortgage insurance premium,, insurance, real restate, taxes andl s meets, maintenance and repairs, heating;and.utilities Pedal assess expenditures ',for the property such as advertising vacancae Other Cash applicant has not owned the property for two or more eairs tion Financial th� Specialist shall estiunate-the incase and , the 1ZehAbilji4 on the available experience, expenditures (2) Allecation o f E endi to the rental units m eQ to Rental Units. The allocation of e tures for the entire propertstb lis e�y dividing total tnonthl xpenditures The result is the shared Y y the number of units in y sxpendi, sxpenditures,allocaTile to the o rPaaroieyd 22-1 ; b. Rehdbilitatio?t Finanping Handbook i it dwelling units, which when subtracted. from the expenditures for'the entire property, produces the monthly expenditures allocable to -.the rental units (i.e., often units are rented with. -heat and water but under separate; electrical meters; in these cases, the heat and water are shared expenses, but the electrical cost to the tenants is not part of the -build' expense). (3) Net Rental Income on Form CDR -6260. The monthly expenditures allocable tote rental units, su tracted' rom the gross rental income fr6R_ithe property, produces the net rental income to be entered on CAR -626,0, block line 3. ii A lieaat Who Is a Person. Income of an applicant who is a "person" includes the in' come of the appplicacant and his .family. The applicant's family includes the applicant and any other person or persons related by blood, marriage, or operation of law, who share the same dwelling unit. If ownersliip of the property rests in more than one person, the applicant is each owner and family. The applicant's income, therefore, is the sum of the ifamily, incomes of all applicants. An applicant's income is established on am annual basis, at the time of applying for a rehabilitation grant and/or loan, and includes: (1) The applicant's earnings. j (2) Spouse's earnings. (3) Other family members living in the home, if their employment is a definite characteristic of family life. j Excluded is the income of an adult family member, other than the!appl.ican� and spouse, who does not have an ownership interest in the property, but included are any funds contributed or paid to the family,, on,a regular basis by an excluded adult family member. (such as room and, board, rent, etc.) Excluded are incomes of those under 18 or full-time students or mentally or disabled children. (4) Other income regularly received by applicant or his family. (5) Net income from real estate, other than the property to be rehabilitated,,•, and any other net business income. i (6) Income from rental units in the property to be rehabilitated based on: i. (a) Gross rental intone, and (b) On the basis of an average of experience for two or more years, ex- penditures for mortgages principal and interest, mortgage insurance premium, service charges, hazard insurance, real estate taxes and special assessments, maintenance and repairs, heating and uiLities,,,, 22-2 Rehabilitation Financing Pattdbook ground rent, and other cash expenditures for the property, .such as advertising vacancies. If the applicant has not .owned the property for two or more years, the staff shall estimate the income and expenditures on the available experience, C. A licant that Ts Other Le al Emit The income of an "other legal entity" incie ne lu es all tie inane, be ore income; taxes, entity comprising: attributable to the legal (1) (2) Net Tore years' experience') formortgage (ori,. insurance premium, service charges, haza and special assessments, maintenance and ground rent, and other cash expenditures advertising vacancies). ted consisting of ,gross fo `pan average of ttiv or 1 and interest, mortgage surance, real estate taxes irs, heating,znd,utilities, the property (including (3) Exclusions. Income of an "other legal entity" does not include the income o -any director, official, officer„ employee, shareholder or other participant in the business. 4. REPORTING OF APPLICANT'S INCOME., The applicant's income is reported on the application orm su att y t e applicant, as follows: a. Rehabilitation Grant. The applicant';s income shall be reported on Foran. CDR -6260, "Total Present Monthly Income of •Applicant." b. Rehabilitation Loan. The applicant's: income shall be reported on Form: CDR -6230 or Form CDR -6243A, depending on whether the loan is to rehabilitate an owner -occupied property, an investor-owned proPerty. (1) Owner-Oooupis PropertN. The applicant's income with resPect to a re 63 loan on an owner -occupied p:coperty shall be.reported on Form CDR -6230, As follows: the gross i;entiil.income from tFe property to be rehabilitated shall be included in b:Lock D, liiae 5, "Gross Income from Real Estate"; and the expenditures in,block E, "Monthly Housing Expense", on lines 1.through 9, as approprlate. (2) Investor Owned Pro ert In the case of'a loan on an investor-owned property, incomes 11 �e reported on Form 'CDR -6234A, block: A, line 2, "Net Income from Rentals", includes the actual net income from all, other rental property.. Similarly,. financial statements submitted, in support of Form CDR -6234A shall reflect actual data; as of the reported date. (a) Purpose for Requiring Actual Data. The primary ,purpose and use �� worm CDB, -6234 , or main al statements, is to assure that a rehabilitation loan is not made to an iinsolvent applicant, whether or not the property for which the :toan,is sought can produce sufficient revenues. 22-3 Rehabilitation Financing H4n4book ij (b) Finding Acceptable Risk in Ma final ' Ca8g. Generally, a rehabilita- tion ibilita- tion loan, secured orunsecur5ed! sFa- 11 not be made with respect to. an investor-owned property, if the piopprty clearly cannot pj`oduce sufficient revenues to satisfy 411 expenditures related to owner- ship, operation, and management of the property, incju4ing repayment of the rehabilitation loan, An exception is a case in which the ability, of the property to produce, sufficient revenues appeals possible, but marginal. In this circumstance, an applicant -4 strong financial condition and ability,to repay may be used by the staff to support a recommendation to the lender. (c) Estimati!yj IncLmea 4 e, a - M?R-64?43)�. The information obtained 43 nUmmf on Form CUR -6243 to furnish information on the 'revenues t .hat can be produced by the property. The income and expense information on FormCDR-6243 is estimated for the property after rehabilitation. The estimates of income shall be realistic in terms of reasonable expectation of the ability and likelihood of the rental market in the' property area to pay the proposed rents; The estimates of expendi- tures shall be realistic, taking into account the rehabilitation work to be done. S. EXCLUSIONS AND ADJUSTMENTS TO APPLICANT'S INCOPIR. a. Grants. Deduct the following amounts from gross income: (1) $25 per child per month (child must be living in the home, under 18 years of age, or full-time student dependent). it (2) Deduct 10% of gross income for taxes (persons not retired,or disal.?Ied), OR see (3). it (3) Deduct 2S% of retirement benefits, disability benefits, 6r, Social Security benefits. ii 6. ASSETS OF GRANT APPLICANTS. Applicants with liquid assets of more than $20,000 shall be ineligible To—ra grant. 22-4 � N City orf 10ILVII City MEMORANDUIM DATE: September 23, 1976 TO: Neal Berlin, City Manager �{ FROM: Dennis kraft, Director of Community Development (I 0� RE: Department of Community Development Monthly Report for August GOALS: Following is a summary of the activities of the Department in August. HOUSING DIVISION I. 237 UNITS SECTION EXISTING UNITS 72 SECTION 23 UNITS, Convert additional units of Section 23 to Section 8 units. Continue to provide assistance to families under Section 23 reducing the number of units to 72 by June 30, 1977. II. 69 UNITS NEW CONSTRUCTION UNDER SECTION 8. To assist in providing additional housing units for low income, elderly and handicapped persons. III. HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN. Provide input to the Housing Assistance Plan for the second: year HCDA application. IV. HOUSING COMMISSION. Provide administrative support to the Iowa City Housing Commission. V. ENFORCE MINIMUM HOUSING CODE. In the interest of public health and safety increase efforts and revise plan for enforcing the city's Minimum Housing Code. AUGUST ACTIVITY: I. During August twelve units were brought into the Section 8 Program, ten of which were Section 23 conversions. One Section 8 unit was lost. Total units under lease in Section 8, 80 units. One hundred thirteen units were under lease in Section 23 as of August 31st. A total of ten Section 23 units were converted and six were lost. Total number of units, both programs, 193. Eighteen annual, initial or final inspections were performed Twenty-three applications for Section 8 were received. / f'3Q Sixty-four units new construction, The Management Contract was approved by the Council and submitted to Midstates for approval by the lending agency and IUD. Construction of the units is under way with the.official ground breaking ceremony being held August 3.0, 1976. Project IA -22-2 was officially terminated recaptured by HUD Central Office. Completed. Housing Commission. There were no Housing Commission meetings held during the month of August, Minimum Housing. See attached, During September, eleven units will be converted from Section 23 to Section B. It is projected that four new units will be brought into the program. Work will start on drafting the detailed management guide„ rules and regulations governing application and occupancy and similar documents. These should be completed and approved by HUD around mid-February, 1977. Completed. Regularly scheduled Housing Commission meetings will be held on September lst and September 15th. At least one special meeting will be held. The Commission will be reviewing the second revision of the minimum housing cc now titled Housing Maintenance and Occupancy Code. The Minimum Housing Section will inspect, 150 structures during the month of September. Burce Burke will be available as necessary to the Housing Commission and other groups interested in the proposed code., .Housing Inspectors will,participa, on a ,rotational basis in the State Fire Marshall's Training Seminar to be 'held from September 29th to October 1, 1976. • AUGUST 1976 • 1 . Number of :;l t ur1 n, <•s .in:o}„v•I,•,i Siny]c family Sinnnr oc, ut,ind gle family , nt•al 26 1- 60_ Duplex structut,,s 29 Multiple family -975 2• Number of Dwelling Units Sip Sin( family 'owner-occuiind family rental 26 879 Duplex -2'9_--- Mult.iple family 3. Number of754 R""min4 Units Single f,,mily owner -occupied Single family 5 113 rental Duplex — Multiple family 1 3 104 4. Of the 160 in cornpli anc e z,ndSL.rCctu.r s inspeetoo - 41 _ .:exe number of t rtific,�i.es werf: isgU,lt Chs Totuxd to he: YPe ttni l -s, Thrio:.n by Single fr. lily owner- P d �Ttellin Un.i'FS Rooming Ct,rit$ in ocou io y1e fa,nily rental 11 _ D, ,,lcx 8 3 Multiple 10' ' 1_ 99- — — _ 0 5• Of the 160 tUr ?uticirrnt for onetoro,noYes inspnc;ted. 119 w,rre found to be i slur d and re.i.w. ec r- du l , (I and corrrct.i ve I-YPe of unit. P tion :,ch- dal, lc�t.tcrs were cl• :Che r).reakclown by number „3 Si:,g7e f,,mi.ly or.•nnr-occ:upicd Ih_aellinq ""-Its t u•ning IT Its Single f.tm.ily rental 15 - Duplex 21 _ 2 - Multiple _ 60 0 _- 63--- - 95 5• Tnspoctions pnrforrned as a.a rrsult of , otr,plaint calls . 1land7ed by Minimum llousin.g Suction b• Referred to 1n0Cher cle 32 partmnnt — 24_ 7• nspcctions Porform-d buyer, by request o1` yer, rea7tor t-•,rty Prior to ale or y re(V nr or cher P tuber fou d in cc, 3 `.umber found ic to haveve d defficiencies ? �, p O �� I P ■Ij I I� ' SI it � �I , I � I i _ �; i � �� � i� ��! i � I ii S" i � i i� i us �i i n p r� i i �m ;, �;� , p i' ' M� r� r �7 a �� ; ;j �; ��:� I i �: 0 0 -2- II. Sixty-four units new construction. The Management Contract was approved by the Council and submitted to Midstates for approval by the lending agancy and HUD., Construction of the units is under way with the, official ground breaking ceremony being held August 30,',1§16. Project IA -22-2 was officially terminated and funds recaptured by HUD Central Office. III. Completed. IV. Housing Commission. There were no Housing Commission meetings held during the month of August. V. Minimum Housing. See attached. PROJECTED ACTIVITY: During September, eleven units will be converted from Section 23 to Section 8. It is projected that :four new units will be brought into the program. II. Work will start on drafting the detailed management guide, rules and regulations governing application andloccupancy and similar documents. These should, be completed. and; approved by HUD around mid-February, 1977. III. Completed. IV. Regularly scheduled Housing Commission meetings will be held on September lst and September 15th. At least one special meeting will be held. The. Commission will, be: revidwing the second revision of iihe minimum housing code now titled Housing Maintenance anSl Occupancy Code. V. The Minimum Housing Section will inspect 150 structures during the month of September. Burce Burke wilii be available as necessary to the I'iousinq Commission and other groups interested in the proposed code. Siousing Inspectors will participate on a rotational bas�.'s in the State Fire Marshall's Training Seminar to be held from September 29th to October 1, 1976. 141 NTIdl114 Ut 'TIS 1 NG :-11WOMS D1.•fiCit Heil :; notod during the I4unth of Aucjust - 1976 by Paragraph Roferral 3 7.06 Nui, 0 9.30.4.13 41 9.30.4.1 2 9.30.4.r, g 9.30.4.R 99 9.30.4.0 11 9. 30. 5.A 6 9.30.9.0 1 9.30.5.0 79 9.30.5.r ].38 9.30.5.r 4 9.30.5.E 1 9.30.5.E 5 9.30.5.G 36 9.30.5.1 1 9.30.5.I 53 9.30.5.) 206 9.30.6.A 5 9.30.6.D 5 9.30.6.Ll 2B 9.30.6.11 30 9.30.6.K a 9.30.'7.A "0 9.-30.'7.A _0 9.30.7.0 9.30.7.D 9.30.7.E 1 9.30.7.F. 9.30.7.F. 9.30.7.F. 29.30.8.A 19.30.3.E 9.30.9.I1 46 9.30.9.) -117 9.30.9.L 34 Section one ]four ia11COS naLhroom P1. wnb in g Hot Water 1:1.1 re s s handrails 10% Window Bath VI nt h7ill Lights OUtletS l.I.cctric Main rorvice Heat Vonts & Air P&T rxtension P&T Valve Screens W;,Ils, Floors, Doors Fit RaL•h Floors Outside Outside ]3111,1. floor Spnce II(Arooll Size Path of Bath Wi1.1(1ows .,rpt Kay's Cc,11ir,g Cellar 1 T3a::ement Dampnc ,s 2 13wiement Winslow 5.A llascr. -t lic ight Shared A a ?resects cubic root Fire Fxt. Furnace Trolation 1.5 Iowa St,lte Fire Fire Door 1111los :ind T.cg[tJ.at%HPns 0413.46 State Code of Iowa -3rd Fldor Dwellings 3Uniform Fire Code Sectioi: 15.1.12 -Sources of Tclnition 13 Uniform Eire Code Se4tioA 27.201-Aocumula.tion of Wasie h'atc,rial. 3Miscellaneous • AUGUST 1976 • 1 . Number of :;1 rucl nros .in:;in :l r d 160 Single family rmer"ocr;ahiod 26 Single family I ntal -Z9 — Duplex struct:ures Multiple family5 2. Number of Dwelling Units Single family )wncr--occuf.ied 26 879 Single family rental. -Z�--- Duplex Multiple family 70—� 7_54 3. Number of Rooming Units Single f,Om.ily owner --occupied 113 Single family rental —5 -- Duplex __L_ Multiple family 3 104 4. Of the 160 structures ins Acte P - d e in cOIFIP!,ance and Certificates -_ 41 issued, '_,ere ,found 'to be were number of type units, The,iaxeak c?b:n by ex Single f.. fly owneroccupied rwIl llinc Lhnji:$ Rooming Unit's Single f;,,ni.1y r.ont.al _ _ 3 Dr ,,1 1� Multiple 99--- -- - --9 - 5. Of the 160 structures insp clod, 119 ware (oluld to be rlreficienL for one or ,nore roa;cc -is and cors( ct•ive looters were insurd and re?inspecLion :;ch dill, d. The breakdown by number , id type of unit. Dwelling ;Traits -ami ng T`r.it;; Single f.:mi l.y own:.r--orcnp i ed - 15• t Single Family rental - - — Duplex 21 _ __0____ Multipl e3 655 - 95 6. 'Inspections performed as a result of complaint calls 32 a. handled by Minimum )sousing Secl-ion 24_ b. Referred to another dcpartmr_nt - 7. Inspections performed by royuest of buyer, roa7.tor, or •lher ""rty prior to ,ale or tn;nslrr 3 F ember fore d in c(-mpli, nee 2 *:urnber fouj;d to have deficiencies +— _• — ls „010.3 th.lt diel not :lolwkr in prior r0co1,0s' 18 Dwel.liny units Rooming units - .L4_ 9. t'ornpliance Certificatea .issued for new struct.ureslunits ;> Single family DupIOx Multiple 10. RocapituIatio„: 160_._ structures were inspected containing rooming Units. gTg d�,rc+Ming wnits .,nd],_ dw011ing and_91 structuxes c6ZE4iniaig 128 With the code —. --r.00mi.ng units were found to be in compli6,7ce 119 _ structures containing '751 dwelling and 100 rooming units were• found to be de£�eient. A bre,a, aown of the deficiencies noted is attached. Comment: The program is on schedule. Compliances this month are 25% of overall inspections., As anticipated, the Housing Office handled an unusually large number of complaint calls due to the resumption of the University rental seas6n., Additional activities included. completion of the Proposed Housing Maintenance and Occupancy Code draft, the manning of the City booth at the two-day University Registration, and; a presentation of the Housing Code Enforcement p Committee for Community Needs. rogxain to the AUGUST REPORT ADVANCE PLANNING DIVISION GOALS: I. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - to continue work in six main areas of the Comprehensive Plan with major work occurring in Tree Planting Plan and Ordinance, Sidewalk Report and Plan, Land Use Analysis;, forms Report, and Utilities Report, as well as to initiate the Housing orms�ieport. II. RIVERFRONT COMMISSION - to continue staff assistance to th Commission.,e Riverfmnt III. URBAN RENEWAL - to provide assistance as needed to other DCD divisions. IV. PERSONNEL - to fill the vacant planner position. AUGUST ACTIVITY: I. Work in Comprehensive Planning continued as follows: Environmental Reports - proceeding on schedule. Transportation - proceeding on schedule with ATS phase 2 report and bike regulations incorporated into new draft of Title VI City Code. Tree Planting Plan and Ordinance. The Planning and Zoning Commission approved the documents :For adoption. Utilities Report - proceeding on schedule. Land Use - proceeding on schedule. Housing Report - one month "behind schedule. II. Staff assistance to the Riverfront Commission continued with final preparation of a prototype public information flyer concerning the use and potentials of the Iowa River sent to the ,printers. III. Staff assistance to urban renewal activities included help in the development of the urban renewal contract. Additionally, one planner resigned to return to school out of state. IV. The vacant planner position was not filled. The lack of these planners will put'a severe strain on our work schedule as we approach the.more intense work program of this fall. A temporary technician was hired in August. PROJECTED ACTIVITY: I. Comprehensive Plan activities will not continue on schedule due to lack of personnel. Due to the need for planning; input in the urban renewal process, several elements of the Comprehensive Plan will bedeferred, but the land use plan and zoning ordinance will be completed on schedule. The deferred items are: economics and urban design studies, environmental quality, waste management, energy, housing and urban design plans, plus the economic base report. -2- Il. Staff assistance to the Riverfront; Commission will continue, 111_ Increased staff assistance to urban renewal projects will constitute approximately $12,000 of staff time for the next nine months. IV. The vacant planner positions recommended to Council will be filled, if approved. Detailed Report of Comprehensive Planning Activities Planning Technicians - During August the planning technicians prepared land use maps, continued work on the Architectural Barrier Removal program Report, prepared the Riverfront Pamphlet, and performed land use surveys and analysis, Additionally, the planning technicians provided graphics for other department?:. Assistant Planners - The assistant planners worked on the land£orms, environ- mental, bikeways, utilities, and housing :reports in August. Additionally, the assistant planners began work in preparing 215 reports and provided assistance to the Riverfront Commission. One assistant planndr left in August to attend school out of state. Associate Planner - The associate planner was involved in the preparation of a Walkways Policy Statement in August. Senior Planner - the Senior Planner directed plaluling activities, reyised final drafts of the troo regulations, finalized the Johnson Bounty Regional ATS Comments for the CPCC, assisted in the preparation of the Vegetation Guide and the Riverfront Pamphlet. Additionally, the senior planner worked on pro- posals for Citizen Participation, acted as Acting Director of the Department, in the absence of the Director and prepared revisions to the tomprehensive Plan Work Program to meet .the needs of the urban renewal contract. REDEVELOPMENT DIVISION GOALS: I. Prepare project management documents and carry out management procedures consistent with LPA policies and HUD requirements. II. Carry out a program of land marketing consistent with LPA decisions and HUD requirements. AUGUST ACTIVITIES: I. Planning: a. Met with the Planning and Zoning Commission regarding the Urban Renewal Plan. The Commission took action, and forwarded their report to the City Council. b. Met with representatives of the University regarding the Urban Renewal Plan. C. Discussed with the City Council the recommendations of the Planning and Zoning Commission and the University,, discussed additional staff comments;; prepared plan modifying resolution. d. Set date for public hearing on the Urban Renewal Plan. e. Reviewed the draft Parking Policy as it relates to.UrbantRenewal. II. Marketing: a. Discussed contract, work program, anti staff capabilities with bon Zuchelli, of Zuchelli, Hunter and Associates. b. Reviewed the proposed draft contract with Zuchelli, Hunter and Associates. c. Completed the sale of parcels 9S-2 and 92-1 to the UnWersity of Iowa. d. Prepared the contract for the sale of the house at 122 E. Court Street t10 Mr. Max Yocum. Calculated costs incurred by City due to incompleted prior sale. e. Met with representatives of the Ioora State Bank and Perpetual Savings and Loan regarding sale of the N. 310 feet of the E. 112 of Block 101. f. Received, reviewed and corrected the appraisals on the land in Block 101. g. Received and reviewed the first two proposals for appraisal services for the land south of Burlington Street. -2 - III. Program Management: a. Secured Council approval for a Division Reorganization, PositionofRedevelopment Coordinator was divided into two Program Coordinator positions; Redevelopment and CDBG. b. Advertised position openings in the Redevelopment Division for. a Coordinator and two part-time specialists. c. Completed a review of rent write-off procedures. d. Performed a review of the relocation account. e. Performed a review of the Contract Compliance monitoring procedures and requirements. f. Performed a review of, and informed HUD of, the environmental. Assessment procedures required in order to purchase project land with CDBG funds. IV. Routine Administration: a. Completed the Annual Relocation and Real Property Acquisition Report for the CDBG program. b. Carried out routine property management functions including arranging for additional repair of the College Block Building closures, and several maintenance calls at the Clinton Street Mall. PROJECTED ACTIVITIES: I. 'Hire personnel to form the Division staff. II. Complete amendment to the Urban Renewal Plan. III. Enter into a contract with Zuchelli, Hunter and Associates and continue work on the land.disposition program. BLOCK GRANT DIVISION GOALS; I. Program Administration: Continue the establishment of CDBG project administrative procedures. II. Accounting: Establish sound accounting procedures enabling monthly reports of HCDA-CDBG funds. III. Project Development: Coordinate the CDBG projects to accentuate their success and effectiveness. AUGUST ACTIVITIES: I. HUD correspondence - Addendum to the Innovative Project proposal prepared by - Doug Lee was reviewed for final draft and submitted to HUD. The proposal was awarded a Block Grant. II. Personnel - Applications for rehabilitation positions were reviewed. Additional advertising outside the Civic Center was prescribed. III. Program Administration - (a) Environmental' reV.iew procedures were begun for Ralston Creek Flood Control interim improvements and. for City Park improvements. (b) Initial steps were taken to coordinate Public Works Improvements q-ith the Neighborhood Improtfement Program. (c) Efforts were made to coordinate CCN social concerns with JCRP human needs "research. IV. Program Development - Many hours were spent in the development of the housing rehabilitation program trying to explain the program to lenders, other city departments, and interested citizens in order to better guaran,tee.the;program''si success when implemented. V. Specific Program Activities - See accompanying; chart. SEPTEMBER ACTIVITIES: I. Finance - A CDBG budget for both FY 1976 and FY 1977,activities will be presented to the finance department to adopt. Monthly'reporting procedures will be negotiated and defined. II. Program development of the housing rehabilitation program will, continue. III. Environmental reviews for Ralston Creek and City 'Park will be.reviewed for adoption enabling a fund request for program Implementation. IV. Project activities will develop as indicated on the attached listing. 1 2 0 • MON HLY SUMMARY OP CDBG PROJECT ACTIVITIES CDBG Pests August Activities �-'---- *Sidewalk policy and Comprehensive vegetation guide were Plan presented to CPCC. *The tree planting ordinance was reworked for submission to Council. *Staffing, needs were defined. *Riverfront :information flyer was developed. Neighborhood *In-house applicants for staff positions were Improvement reviewed and additional Program advertising prescribed. *Program rehab standards were defined. *Grant financing packages were defined. *Program manual procedure was started. Area 2 has been completed. 3. Code Enforcement Other inspections. continue as listed i,n the housing division monthly report: The drafting department 4. Harrier reviewed the report. Removal Barrier Removal Program 5. Park Improvements and Additions 6. urban Renewal Land Acquisition 7. Committee on Community Needs *An environmental review was prepared for City Park to be reviewed for adoption in September. *All imprgveme'nts have been tabled until environmental reviews are complete- MONTHLY omplete. This is a future activity. *chairperson resigned. *Subcommittees continued work in all Block Grant activities. *Code Enforcement program was reviewed. Projected September Activities _ *Citizen participation plan wilii be defined. *Soils and vegetatiolz :reports will, continue.. esented *Staffing needs will be presented to Council anil.advertsed. *Council adoption of tree plant- ing ordinance., i *Research of' loan financing procedures will continue. *Staff applications.Wi11 be reviewed. *Presentation for Council will: be prepared. Work will be: done in, area 6. Reinspection will,be performed as necessary. Final draft ;P41 btu prepared for Council ,preaentatioii October 11. *Environmental reviews will continue. : *A new time table of actiivi:Cies will be drawn up.. See redevel;opmentr re.PvPr fb,P specific p}oB,xess i'e-, *Vacant position, will, be f?� ilea, *Ralston Creek and Park programs will be reviewed. -2- CDBG Projects August Activities 8. Ralston Creek *Powers -Willis contract was signed. *Environmental reviews were started. *Stormwater Management Ordinance was presented to Council. 0 Pro acted September. Activities *Stormwater Management rules and regulations will be developed, into a booklet,. *Environmijntal reviews willG continue,; AUGUST MONTHLY REPORT CURRENT PLANNING AUGUST ACTIVITY: Staff reports were prepared for three rezoning applications, two preliminary plats, a final plat, two preliminary Large Scale Non -Residential. Development plans, a final Large Scale Non,Res,identi.al Development plan, and a street vacation request. Because of the many staff reports prepared in the month of August, work on procedures for the submittal, review and approval of rezoning applications, subdivisions, Large Scale Residential Developments, Large Scale Non -Residential Developments, Planned Area Developments, and vacation requests was not completed as anticipated. Because of a new zoning ordinance contemplated by the Advance Planning Division, an ordinance revising the Ml and 612 Industrial Zones will be deferred and incorporated into the new zoning ordinance. PROJECTED ACTIVITY: No specific numeric objectives for subdivision plat reviews, rezoning application review, etc. are established due to the impossibility -of predicting the number of submissions which will be filed. It is, however, contemplated that such submissions will decrease with the close of the construction season and that the procedures for the submittal, review and approval of applications submitted for consideration by the City will be completed in September or October. In addition, at the request of the City Manager, a feasibility study will be prepared on the advantages of being annexed into Iowa City vs. the high payments for fire insurance and other utilities in the County. i i ,i �.I i i i. Harvey Miller, Chief of Police August 20, 1976 Tony Kushnir, Assistant City Attorney Private Parking FACTS A citizen received a parking ticket for parking in the parking lot of the Eagle grocery store on Dodge Street. QUESTION PRESENTED Whether a municipality Property. can regulate parking on private CONSLUSION Section 6.16.26 of the parking of Munieipa,L Code which prohibite a motor vehicle upon private s th consent of the owner is void as the re property without the *' scope of power granted to municipalit:igulation is beyond the and 9 321.236 of the Code of Iowa 1975, and Chapter 364 DISCUSSION' The question presented is whether a another without the persons consent. municipality can make it a crime to park ones motor vehicle upon the property of relat hishsituationndeals with two private: Parties and the themwhether one party allows for the parking of another s vehicle upon one's property. The public The public is in no way involved in this agreement or lack thereof between these two private individuals. Section 356.1 grants to Municipalities oroad powers in the protection of health, safety -and general welfare to its residents. This grant, however, Its specifically limited by the -terms that This grant "does not include the power to enact private law or civil law governing civil relationships except,as_incident to an in - Property J ' vil power," As established above,, parking on private Property is'.a privat!t civil relationship between the parties con-, cerned and unless the city can show that the regulation thereof is aincident to an independent invalid. is invalid. municipal power, the regulation Genenally, municipal ordinances which regulate parting relate only to public Streets, ways and grounds. Section 321.236 permits municipalities to enact reasonable regulations "with respect to streets and highways under their tiurisdiction" pertaining to 'the standing and parking of vehicles. The regulation of par) ILin q upcu private property, thus is not authorized under this provitsion. Courts have ruled that municipalities could establish, maintain and operate off-street parking facilities. See Ermels v. Webster City, 71 NWzd 911. Authorization for establishing and maintaining offs street municipal parking lots is said,to come from the pojlice pplier. The establishment of a parking lot by a city may be a necessary act in the interest of public safety. Indeed, municipal operation, of parking lots has a definate bearing on,public safety is the use, of public streets. Courts have extended this doctrine toiincludo the regulation of private parking lots stating that such regulationis permitted under general police power enactment. See Gard dn.State Racing Association v. Cherry Hill Tp.201 A2d 554 (1964) and Jeffery ti v. Salinas, 22 Cal Rptr 486, where an ordinance was upheld wherein it required property owners to supply a certain amount ofi:off-street parking proportionate to their development. These regula?tions, low - ever, pertain to the establishment, operation and maintaiilance of off-street parking facilities and their relaetontfo public safety, and not to the enforcement of a ` private parson's regulations for parking at said lot. In this instance, the City is not: regulating the parking of a vehicle upon private property but only such parking that is without the owner's consent. There is no nexus of this regulation to a public Purpose as established in the private parking lot cases. The sole purpose of this ordinance is to provide a remedy to a private party to enforce a relationship or lack thereof between that party and another. There is no connection between that Parpgsandnd the police power granted to a municipality to provide! for the health,, safety and general welfare of the resident of the City of Iowa City, Io4m. Further, the State of Iowa has provided property owners a remedy to an automobile parked upon their property without consdnt•. Chapter 556 B of the Code of Iowa, 1975 provides that an owner or other lawful possession of real property may remove or cause the, removal of any motor vehicle or other personal property which has been unlawfully parked or placed on that real property, and may place such property in storage until the. Owner pays a fair and reasonable charge. In the past, the City of Iowa City has been enforcing the remedy given by the State to private individuals and on many occasions bore the coat when it discovered the party requesting the ticket and removal was in error. :1 do not see!why it should do so now or in the future. 9 low AUGUST MONTHLY REPORT CURRENT PLANNING AUGUST ACTIVITY: 0 Staff reports were prepared for three rezcnl,nl; applications, two preliminary plats, a final plat, two preliminary Large Scale Non-Resiilential Development plans, a final Large Scale Non -Residential Development plan, and a street vacation request. Because of the ,many staff reports prepared in the month of August, work on procedures for the submittal, review and approval of rezoning applications, subdivisions, Large Scale Residential Developments, Large Scale Non -Residential Developments, Planned Area Developments, and vacation requests was not completed as anticipated. Because of a new zoning ordinance contemplatedby the Advance :Planning Division, an ordinance revising the M1 and M2 Industrial Zones will be deferred and incorporated into the new zoning ordinance. PROJECTED ACTIVITY: No specific numeric objectives for subdivision plat reviews, rezoning application review, etc. are established due to the impossibility of predicting the number of submissions which will be filed. It is, however, contemplated that such submissions will decrease with the close of the construction -season and that the procedures for the submittal, review and approval of applications submitted for consideration by the City will 1>e completed in September or October. In addition, at the request of the City Manager, a feasibility study will be prepared on the advantages of being annexed into Iowa City vs. the high payments for fire insurance and other utilities in the County. CDBG Projects 8. Ralston Creek -Z- August Activities *Powers -Willis contract was signed. *Environmental reviews were started. *Storinwater Management Ordinance was presented to Council. Pro acted September ActiVtt6s d— *Stormwatei; Management rulle; and regul;pions All be developed into a booklet. *Environmental reVaews will continue. =n Harvey Miller, Chief of Police Tony Kusihnir, Assistant City Attorney Private Parking FACTS August 20, 1976 A citizen received a parking ticket for parking in the parking lot of the Eagle grocery store on Dodge Street. QUESTION PRESENTED Whether a municipality can regulate parking on private property. CONSLUSION Section 6.16.26 of the Municipal Code which prohibits the parking of a motor vehicle upon private property without the consent of the owner is void as the regulation is beyond the scope of power granted to municipalities through Chapter the and 9 321.236 of the Code364 of Iowa 1,975. DISCUSSION The question presented is whether a municipality can make it a crime to park ones motor vehicle upon the property of another without the persons consent. This situation deals with two private parties and the relationship between them - whether one party allows for the parking of another's vehicle upon one's property. The public The public is in no way involved in this agreement or 1p ub thereof between these ck two private individuals. Section 364.1 grants to municipalities yroad powers in the protection of health, safety and general welfare to its residents, This grant, however, �s,specifically limited by the terms -that this grant "does not include the power -to enact private law or civil law governing civil relationships except.as,_incident.to an in- dependent�pivil power." As established above, parking on private property is`a privatt civil relationship between the parties con- cerned and unless the city can show that the regulation thereof is aincident to an independent municipal power, the regulation is invalid. 173 Gennaally, municipal ordinances which regulate parking relate only to public streets, ways and grounds. section 32,1.236 permits municipalities to enact reasonable regulations "with respect to streets and highways under their gurisdiction" pertaining to the, standing and parking of vehicles. The regulation of parkinq upon private property, thus is not authorized under this provision. Courts have ruled that municipalities could establish,maintain and operate off-street parking facilities. See Ermels v. Webstlr City, 71 NWZd 911. Authorization for establieshin(i and maintaininij off- street municipal parking lots is said to come from the police power,. The establishment of a parking lot by a city may be a necessary act in the interest of public safety. :Indeed, municipal operation of parking lots has a definate bearing on public safety in the use of public streets. Courts have extended this doctrine to iliclude,'the regulation of private parking lots stating that such regulation is permitted under general police power enactment, See Garden,.State Racing Association v. Cherry Hill Tp.201 A2d 554 (1964) and;',Jeffe' '! v. Salinas, 22 Cal Rptr 486, where an ordinance was upheld urhereiIn it required property owners to supply a certain amount of o:Ef-street parking proportionate to their development. These regulationse how- ever, pertain to the establishment, operation and maintaina`.pce of, off-street parking facilities and their relahiontfo public :safety and not to the enforcement of a private person's regulations for parking at said lot. In this instance, the City is not regulating the parking of a, vehicle upon private property but only such, parking that is without the owner's consent. There is no nexus of this regulation to a public purpose as established in the private parking lot cases. The sole purpose of this ordinance is to prgvide a remedy to a private party to enforce a relationship or lack; thereof between that party and another. There is no connection between that parpgsandnd the police ptrer granted to a municipality to provide for the health, safety and general welfare of the resident of the City of Iowa City, Iowa. Further, the State of Iowa has provided property owners a remedy to an automobile parked upon their property witbout:consent. Chapter 556 B of. the Code of Iowa, 1975 provides that an o%finer or other lawful possession of real property may remove or cause the removal of any motor vehicle or,other personal property which hast been unlawfully parked or placed on't'hait real property, and may Place such property in storage until the.bwner pays a fair and raiasonabla charge. In the past, the City of16wa City has been enforcing the, remedy given by the State to private individuals and on nasty occasions, bore the cost when it discovered the party requesting the ticket aiid removal was in error. I do not see why it should do so now or in the future. /"' TO: FROM: RE: j' cHly of p+r wa Ci* z MEMO INFEDU ' DATE: Sep`t-ember 27, 1976 Honorable Maty C. Neuhauser, Mayor & has of the Council, of the City of Iowa City, Iowa Bob Baalin, Asst. City Attorney Litigation: Victor Industries Corp. v. City of Iowa City Dear Mayor Neuhauser & barbers of the Council Recently I sent you a short mems to whio`t was attached a cocr of Judge Chapnan's recent decision in the case of Victor Industries Corp. v. City of Iaaa City. The City Manager has Fe5u sted•'`that I send you a short report giving my assessment of the results in the case. ! The single issue in the case was jrhether, or not the assessrent. made by the City exceeded the benefits conferred upon the Victo: Pletal property. The testimony for Victor bbtals was that there was 1 ittle or no benefit conferred on the property by the street assess-* Trent. The maximn benefit that, their witnesses would concede ,as Prom $7,000 to $8,000. Donald Johnson, an appraiser from De's Dbimezi4i testified for the City that in his opinion $120,000 of benefit was conferred on the property by the improvement. The- Court found that,. "the enhancement and value testified to by defendant`s witness eras as unrealistic on the high side as the plaintiff's w"itnesses� were oro the low side. The true balance lies soredtere in between." In the Grnclzll case, a case that reached the Iowa sup_nme cv=t; some years ago out of Clinton, Icraa, the court approyed a 40% red,_ tion in an assessment where the paving improverents, while gcnferr .' a benefit on the abutting property191 , also greatly benefited the publiFj at large. I believe that the city faced just this s�tuation.wi.th regard to the First Avenue Realignment, in that, one Of the igajor re4gpns for realigning First Avenue was to improve traffic flow in that areal, of town. It is clear from the court's opinion, that he considered this to be an important factor. The court was also slightly unhappy with one procedural aspect of Mr. Johnson's appraisal. Sometime in the future, I will be for•ra-ding sante recnr'ndatogs to the Director of Public S4orks with regard to special assessaent Procedure. These reawendatiors will consist of bits of inforsatign, and insight that I have gained along the line, some of than, fron:Iess; than completely satisfactory experience. I believe it would have helped in this case if we had had. some sort of an appraisal of the benefits to be conferred by the project before we actually begin the project. Of course, this adds to project costs somewhat. However, I believe that early appraisals are Forth the cost, since Mst evezyoae, including judges, seem quite willing to second guess the assessment process, particularly where a single property receives a substantial assessment. To some extent, a proper appraisal before the project is undertaken may head off potential lawsuits. In any event, it makes the City look more reasonable if they proceed on the basis of an appraisal as opposed to making an assessment and then later trying to find an appraiser to justify what they've already done. I have discussed this decision with Mr. Ken Haynie, an attorney in Des Moines who has assisted the City in many special assessment nrojectsi, and we believe that the decision is an acceptable one, and would not recaiwend an appeal. If you have any further questions, I would be pleased to answer the4m as best I can. Thank you, 11 PAIN.. " AHNNETI A. GIOf6N M•raorNr.Hk Lee ALEXANDRA P.HPgIMI., AlcuAx01 DAur A4rao Qlar MOON LANBHeU 1N+7o1 -11 Nry (hlnn. IMNAY W. MAMA M.P. of Nd,wi« JACK D. MALTM,,, N.,or ul S.n In'rlro ABRAHAM BRAME N.,or o1 Nry Yak JOHN J. BUCKLHY NyaDG, Hxxr, M.x AIGIM. G.HATc11Rx N. gale, HAYNAx0 mam of NJACKA hnnON HAXXY KINNEr Hrym oI Albugxxq PATIENCe LATEING NON+h�m. Gry IULPtBj J. PERK M+Grrrl.M GKLw Of ROMDIIU 9AAC11L0 ALrm al,S SULLIVAN GEORGE AA.W.S,AN M-MWESLEY or AUHL Ae Wr;LRY G UIILMAN MIWHITE KEVIN tl Te M+, of Rovm AdHN.,Bo J: WILLIAM H MGNIu1ou, Charman bEN G. B m HUm G. EOO.ALIE H+,w or U*W. TAt".01 L. A., Afgorof Lx D1 AICIIARo GRi, H.ra of AMI LER STM'M tHAO'hi' H.ryr of .Cmfa STANLGY A. CMIOI H. HANE G. TANXLEA,p. M+ra of JMk,mHur LOUH J. TULLIO ll.Ea of LIe TED C' WILL, ALra of PRTe WILNIl H+r« 01 &A lhr' COLEMAN A. YOUNG H+,p of 011'011 &"-III, Dkmw JOAN J. GUNrIfrA 0 0 T`BLBPHo.YB: 43-7330; (ARRA Cane1202) UNITED STATES CONFERENCE Ol{ MA17ORS 1620 E YE S'r A B E T, NO R H UrE ST WASHINGTON, D. C. 20006 September 23, 1976 The Honorable Mary Neuhauser Mayor of Iowa City City Hall Iowa City, Iowa 52240 Dear Mayor Neuhauser: I am pleased to appoint: you as a member of the,CoEmunity De:lop= ment and Housing Committee of the United States Conference of McjXlors. The chairman of this committee is Neil Goldschmidt of 'Portland, Oregon. Serving as vice chairmen will be Dennis Lynch of Pawtudk;et; R.I., Vice Chairman for Community Development and Richard J. Davis Of Portsmouth, Va., Vice Chairman for Housing. As you know, the Conference of Mayors' structure is compriseii of six standing committees -- Community Development and Housing, Criminal and Social Justice, Energy and Environment, Human Development, Tirians- portation and Urban Economics. The real work of the Confia done in these committees. erence il This year -- to develop our 1977 urban agenda for Congress mt�dl convene ;in the Executive Branch -- the six standing committees wil Chicago on November 7-8 at the O'Hare Hilton, The meeting is schgid- uled to begin at 9 a.m. on Sunday, November 7 and; will adjourn an', noon on Monday, November 8 to enable you to return to your city on the 8th. This meeting is in addition to our annual Mid -Winter Meeting in Washington, D.C., January 18-19. Conference of Mayors staff cri,11 be in touch with you shortly to discuss plans for the ChicagomeetEng, This year should be a promising year for our cities if we all Pull together for a comprehensive urban program. I look forward t:o working with you in the year ahead. Sincerely, Kenneth A. Gibson President Mayor of Newark f7. 1,\ U.S. Conferee► REGISTRATION 10:OGam of Mayors PROGRAM FIR'.>T DAY Nlatloljal Chicago, Illinois October 27 - �9, 1976 Hyatt Regency O'Hare $6S registration fee OPENING SESSION HOUSING: PUTTING IT UP OR PUTTING UP WITH IT? 1:30-2:30pm A keynote presentation on the advantages and disadvantages of a community playing an active role In housing development. 2:30.3:15pm LOW & MODERATE INCOME HOUSING: WHAT'S IN IT FOR THE (DEVELOPER? A successful private developer discusses how the housing development process works and how he profits from It. WORK SESSION THE CURRENT STATUS OF THE HOUSING INDUSTRY IN YOUR COMMUNITY 3:30-5:OOpm A work session analyzing the current factors influencing private sector partici- pation in the provision of lower income housing. RECEPTION 5:DOpm SECOND DAY GENERAL SESSION UNDERSTANDING AND INFLUENCING HOUSING MARKET DYNAMICS 9:00-10:003111 A presentation on housing market dynamics, factors that cause housing and neighborhood deterioration, and strategies that communities use to influence the provision of housing. WORK SESSION AN�AritLYZINGshops using caeHOUSING goMARj MARKET Ta Boal housingNG merkHOUSING PRIORITIES 10:00am-12:00pm dynamics, and to sot appropriate policies to influence them. LUNCH OPEN 12:OOpm GENERAL SESSION AEE UHbNIQUaES Institute STIMULATE presentatiHOUSING USIIN II tIo LOluenae private invest REiMVESTMERT 2:00-3:00pm ment decisions In housing. WORK SESSION PACKAGING TECHNIQUES TO STIMULATE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT AND RI,EiNVESTM"E'IT' 3;00-$,OOpin Workshops analyzing the costs and benefits of intervention techniques as. applied to a variety of specific housing aituatione and IocaRkns. THIRD DALY GENERAL SESSION PUTTING THE HAP IN PERSPECTIVE 9:00-10:30am A presentation on how to effectively use the HAP to meet the community's housing responsibilities and achieve local housing goals. CLOSING SESSION THE HOUSING INDUSTRY RESPONSE 10:30am-12:OOpm A private developer and lender (who will be present throughout the conference) will discuss holm the private sector and the local community can Work together to provide housing. ADJOURNMENT 12:00pm 17 WILL J. HAYEK JOHN W. HAYEK C. PETER HASEK HAYEK, HAYEK & HAYEK ATTORNEYS AT LAW 110 EAST WASHINGTON STREET IOWA CITY, IOWA 52240 September 27, 1976 Mr. David Johansen McGladrey Hansen Dunn & Company Certified Public Accountants 324 Savings and Loan Building Iowa City, Iowa 52240 Dear Mr. Johansen: Ill AREA CODE 31II1 337.9606 O SEP2 8 19.76 ` ALBBI£ S T ©LF -108 CITY CLERK I am responding to your letter of September 7, 1976, requesting information concerning pending claims and litigation involving the City of Iowa City. Attached you will find a list of pending litigation items as of June 30, 1976, as you requested. Also contained on this list are suits, which have been filed between June 30, 1976, and September 24, 1976, This document is marked as Exhibit A. Please note that this listing does not include any pending cases in magistrate's court in which the City is a party or any small claims cases in which the City is a party. Small claims cases are those in which the amount in controversy* is less than $1, 000. 00. In your letter you also request information concerning possible contingent liabilities. In our telephone conversation on September 24 you indicated that you were interested in claims against the City in which an actual expression of an intent to assert the claim has been made in some form or another. I am attaching to this letter as Mkhibit B a listing of all claims in excess of $1, 000, 00 which have been filed against the City since the beginning of this year. Some of these claims are being covered by insurance. As you know, however, are general liability insurance coverage has been terminated, The City of Iowa City and Johnson County are in disagreement concerning the liability of the City concerning certain property taxes in connection with urban renewal acquisitions. The City will be filing a lawsuit shortly seeking a declaratory judgment from the Court concerning this liability. If you wish further information on this property tax matter, I would be happy to supply it to you. If you need further information from me, please do not hesitate 17 i _ 2 _ September 27, 1976 Mr. David Johansen i ' I to ask. Respectfully submitted, Jo n W. Hayek i JWH:vb Enclosure i I EYM BIT A ~ �S. QEF? 3'3, z LITIGATION y18BIE S,TOLrO,': `S CIT`{' CLEM (Pending as of June 30, 1976) 1. State v. City and Korshoj Construction Company. Damage suit. Trial completed, awaiting ruling. Possible liability $60,000.00. Insurance carrier has denied coverage. 2. Bjornsen Investment Company v. City. Contract suit. Settlement likely. Possible liability $436,000.00. Liability unlikely. No insurance coverage. 3. Woodburn v. City. Urban renewal condemnation suit. Possible liability $30, 000. 00 plus $5,000.00 costs. 4. Steele v. City. Urban renewal condemnation appeal. Possible liability $20, 000.00 plus $5,000.00 costs. 5. O'Brien v. City. Urban renewal condemnation appeal. Judgment paid. No longer pending. 6. Stasi Inc. v. City. Urban renewal condemnation appeal. Possible liability $70, 000.00 plus $8, 000. 00 costs. 7. Hamburger Inc. v. City. Urban renewal condemnation appeal. Three cases consolidated for trial. Settled subsequent to June 30, 1976, and no longer pending. 8. Little Caesars v. City. Urban renewal condemnation appeal. No petition filed by Plaintiffs. Subject to dismissal in my opinion. No liability. 9. Jacksons Inc. v. City. Urban renewal condemnation appeal. Possible liability $90,.000. 00 plus $10, 000. 00 costs. I :,I ;if. 0 - 2 - 10. Annex Inc, v. City. Urban renewal condemnation appeal. Pending June 30, 1976. Subsequently tried and judgment paid. No longer pending. 11. Kinney v. City. Urban renewal condemnation appeal. No petition filed by Plaintiff, Subject to dismissal in my opinion. No liability. 12. Cahill v. City. Urban renewal condemnation appeal. Liability $8, 000.00 including costs. 13. Farris v. City. Urban renewal condemnation appeal. Possible liability $21„ 000. 00 plus $5,000.00 costs. 14. Victor Industries v. City. Assessment case. No liability to City. 15. Angelsburg v. City. Assessment case. No liability to City. 16. Farkus v. City. Assessment case. No liability to City, 17. Peet v. City. Assessment case. No liability to City. 18. Korshoj Construction Company v. City. Contract suit. Possible liability $620, 368. 00 plus costs of $10, 000. 00. Liability of this magnitude is unlikely in my opinion. This case is pending in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa. No insurance coverage. 19. Amerex Corporation v. City. Zoning suit. Possible liability $917, 000., 00. Costs $15, 000. 00. Insurance carrier has denied coverage. Liability of this magnitude is unlikely in my opinion. 20. Short v. City. Discrimination suit. Possible liability $3, 000, 000. 00. Costs $25, 000. 00. Insurance carrier has denied coverage. Liability of this magnitude is unlikely in my opinion. Suit pending in United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa. 0 - 3 - 21. Baker v. City. Denver boot case. Pending in Iowa Supreme Court. No liability to City. 22. Stevens v. City. Access and drainage suit. Possible liability $55, 000. 00. Insurance coverage denied by carrier. 23. Lynch v. City. Civil service case. No liability of significance. 24. Moore v. Epstein. Damage suit. Possible liability $300, 000. 00 plus costs of $5, 000.00. 25. City v. Epsteins. Rent collection suit. No liability, 26. Short v. City. Urban renewal condemnation appeal. Possible liability $50, 000. 00 plus $7, 000. 00 costs, 27, Voss v. City. Urban renewal condemnation appeal. Possible liability $50, 000. 00 plus $7, 000. 00 costs. 28. Rock Island v. City. Assessment appeal. No liability. 29. City v. Epsteins. Eviction action. No liability. 30. Fireman's Fund v. County and City. Liability unlikely. 31. Rock Island v. City. South Market Square case. $350, 000. 00 possible liability. Some liability probable. 4 a -4- (Cases filed June 30, 1976, to September 24, 1976) 32. Christian Retirement Services v. Board of Review. Certiorari action. Property tax case. No liability. 33. Christian Retirement Services v. Board of Review. Property tax case. No liability. 34. Schoff Construction Company v. City. Damages case. Liability covered by insurance. 35. Jones v. Bovey, et al. Damages suit. Liability covered by insurance. 36. City v. Westinghouse Learning Corporation. Human Relations suit. No liability. 37. City v. Yellow Cab Company. Human Relations suit. No liability. 38. Paul Helen Building Corporation v. City. Damage case. Passible liability $9, 000. 00. Insurar.;e coverage undetermined. EXHIBIT B COMM RCE °o . CIVIC CENTER, a10 E WASHINGTOY ST. IOWA CITY, IOWA 52240 319354 -IBM m •IOWA CITY, IOWA- /ounJ.J lulu September 24, 1976 John Hayek City Attorney 11 L: KI I SEP2 3 :Mil UJ i ,fk8B111: ST04,'rfU . CITY CLEC l Listed are the claims filed during 1976 in the amount of $1000: 76-H4 Michael Motyko Injury as result of police actions. Amt. not listed, 76-H9 James W. Rensberger Bus hit auto $10,91. 76-H18 Robert C. Krueger City vehicle hit auto $1434 76-H29 Everett Evans Suffered injuries at Rec. Center. �:At not listed. 76-132 Debra L. Cagan Fell on steps of Deadwood $20,000 76-h35 Dorothy A. Miller Suffered broken hip $10G A00 76-H42 Firemens Fund Am. $2,000 76-H61 Pamela R. Weir Tree fell on fence, tree etc. $100CI 76-1163 Iowa Flyers Inc Plane broke loose from tie down $1.4'71, If you have an}, further questions, please do not hesitate to calij me. Jan Burr �J (�IMA Yl�gIDc,nc, CIVIC COIPN'NI IARC. nISYq EFvWhNA5,711�3D 101 ST./ X-Oewx Y. IDWA e nn September 27, 1976 Ms. Ruth Roesch 309 Iowa Avenue Apartment 4 Iowa City, Iowa S2240 Dear Ms. Roesch: Thank you for your letter to Mayor Neuhauser expressing your opinion on housing for the elderly and handicapped in Iowa City. '771e City Council has shared your opinion on the desirability of having housing for the elderly and handicapped in the central part Of Iowa City. Although a proposal was submitted a couple of years ago to locate such a project on the corner of Court and Dubuque Streets, the severe economic limitations which were .imposed on this project by the federal government resulted in the project not being completed. In As recent discussions on urban renewal, the Council has continuously identified housing as a top priority use for the land located between Burlington and Court Streets. As of this time we do not know whether this will include hc.using for the elderly and handicapped because of the previously mentioned economic problems and the relatively high cost of land in downtown Iowa City. The Council is hopeful that the federal government will increase the cost limitations for housing for the elderly and handicapped and that this will result in the construction of some close -in housing of this type. Once again, I would like to thank you for expressing your opinions on housing to the City Council. Very truly yours, �r� Dennis R. raft, AIP Director of Community Development DRK:sc 0 • MINUTES CITY/UNIVERSITY MEETING SEPTEMBER 2, 1976 PERSONS IN ATTENDANCE: Ray Mossman, Dick Gibson, Pat Strabala, Dick Plastigo, Dennis Kraft L AT THE INTERSECTION OP Mr. Mossman indicated the University was ready to go on this item-. The gpes"tion raisedwas the CityOnce it had been t beeninstalled.he Mr. Mossmam indicatedgthat ta�n agreement had been drafted by a member of the University's legal staff but this had'nat Yet been reviewed by the University administration. The agreement! would result in the University assuming all costs of installation and.then turning the_sighal over to the City for care, supervision, operation, maintenance and control. If and when the signal is no longer needed to control traffic at Melrose and Woolf, then the signals shall revert to the University. It was also indicated that the City's legal staff will review this agreement and that a final decision will be made next month. SEWER BILLING RATES Mr. Strabala indicated that the City will bill the University at the rate of 27¢ per 100 cubic feet for all University oriented sewage which is to be' treated by the City of Iowa City. It was further :indicated that this will occur as soon as the water pumpage information is received by the City, Mr. Mossman indicated that the University will prdbably receive this bill and then pay on the basis of the contract whicb is presently in force. It was further indicated that the University will account then sot up an escrow ' for the contingency amount, i.e., the difference between the 27�per 200 cubic feet and the amount that the University has been paying under the e�cisting contract. It was further indicated that the University's sewage study is presently on schedule. Mr. Plastino indicated that the present study being done for the City on lime sludge effluent by the Veenstra and Kimm consulting firm has been completed and that this study does include the University's water plant. this study is to determineThe purpose; of what needs to be done in order to comply with EPA requirements. It was agreed that a copy of this, study would be sent to Mr. iscussed at the next meeting. Mossman and that this would be d URBAN RENEWAL The Urban Renewal property transactions between the City and the University have been completed except for one 12,000 square foot lot which is located in Block 95. This property is a homestead and is presently involved in litigation between the property owner and the City. The time of disposition Of this land to the University will have to be determined later. 17 i' -2- ATHLETIC EVENTS TRAFFIC Mr. Mossman indicated that the annual meeting of all interested pai;tiea had been held recently relative to the control of traffic during athletic events at the University and that no apparent unusual problems were ascertained to exist at this meeting, BIKEWAYS PLAN It was reported that whale the proposed bikeways plan is of a high ,priority, on .the State Bikeways Plan, as of this time no word has been received on either the funding or the lack of funding for this project from the Federal Highway Administration. STREET SIGNING The University will meet with the State Department of Transportation on the question of signing along Interstate 80 and Highways 6-218, The University indicated that certain problem's will have to be solved'b�tween the City and the DOT, and that subsequent to this time, the University will be discussing the question of placing a limited number of signs. on City streets. URTA GRANT It was reported that amendment requests have been,received from three bus manufacturing companies and that as of this time the final bids have not yet been received. The bids are scheduled to be opened on Septembex',20th, TRAFFIC PLANNING It was reported that as of this time the status of Freeway 518..and its various interchanges has not yet been determined. I Li f Benn1sJ R. 'ra t Director of Comiqunity 1]evglopiGent i II i � COMMITTEE ON COMMUNITY NEEDS AGENDA OCTOBER 6, 1976, 4:00 P.m. IOWA CITY RECREATION CENTER MEETING ROOM A Speakers: 4:00 Housing Rehabilitation Program Development Report by Julie Vann,Program Coordinator i Business Meeting: 1. Approve minutes from September 1, 1976, meeting. 2. Receive comments from guests or visitors. 3. Reports from subcommittees a. Human Needs b. Communications c. Comprehensive Plan d. Coordination e. Rehab f. Monitoring or 3rd Year Application with Steve Pals, 4. Plan Citizen Participation f Public Administration Intern 5. Other business 6. Adjournment Meeting Objectives: 1. To understand the developing housing rehabilitation program* grant 2. To plan a work schedule of events leading up 'to the 3rd y ear application March 1, 1977. i �4 STATE OF IOWA GOVERNOR'S YOUTH OPPORTUNITY PROGRAM. Final Report Youth Employment Projects September, 1975 - June, 19716 I. DATA (Please double check all figures - if the 'Figures do not add, the report will' be returned for corrections) A. Community and/or Counties: Johnson County B. Project Period: September 1, 1975/ May 31, 1?£ C.. Job Slots 1. Total number of job slots developed: r= 2. Total number of job slots filled: E' D. Participants 1. Number of youth employed at outset of project 13 2. Number of youth employed at end of project 33 3. Total number of youth employed (not necessarily the same as "total number of job slots filled"): C: A. Male B. Female' Age 14 4 T Age 15 Age 16 3 Age 17. 5_ Age 18 1 _ - Other TOTAL —22 4. Total number of minority students employed: A. Male B. Female* 5. Educational level of youth employed: A. Male B. Female 7th Grade - - Bth Grade 9th Grade 10th Grade � _ 14 11th Grade 1 9 12th Grade r _ 3 TOTAL .21 39 6. Dropouts a. Total number of youth who began employment as school dropouts: iF b. Number of Youth who began program as drop- outs and returned -to school: 2 c. Total number of youth who dropped out of school while participating in the project: 1 7. Total number of youth who participated in pre -career educational programs before employment: A. .Male B. Female 6 9 15 8. Total number of youth who participated in pre -career educational programs during employment: A. Male B. Female 14 11 c. Reasons for termination: enrollees secured employment in the private sector. 12 had school conflict&r their family vas not supportiveof then working. 2 youth moved from, the area. 4 Yrouth were terminated because of p or work.habi s d. Type of follow-up used For terminate 1louth Youth xere contacted by phone, some would contact the director looker.': for assiste.ance in securing employment also. • it �� t JJ A. Male B. Female 8 l5 23 9• Total number of youth who, at time of employment, came from families receiving public assistance (ADC, Social Security, unemployment insurance, etc.): 23 A. Male B. Female a.- Number of present ADC recipients 10 b. Number of youth from _9 _ _ low Income families 4 15 c. Number of delinquent or pre -delinquent youth, 2 2 - d. Number of mentally _ retarded q 1 e. Number of dis- r_ advantaged youth _ 3 1]. 10. Number of youth terminated from program: 25 A. Male B. Female 14 11 c. Reasons for termination: enrollees secured employment in the private sector. 12 had school conflict&r their family vas not supportiveof then working. 2 youth moved from, the area. 4 Yrouth were terminated because of p or work.habi s d. Type of follow-up used For terminate 1louth Youth xere contacted by phone, some would contact the director looker.': for assiste.ance in securing employment also. • it �� t JJ 11. a. Number of youth who participated in GYOP'who graduate R from high school b. Number of youth who graduated end will be continuing their education beyond high school 5 E. Average number of hours each youth was employed per week:. in -school 1� summer F. Job Supervision 1. Total number of'supervisors paid from project budget: 2. Total number of work site supervisors not paid from project budget: 3. Average number of youthassigned to each super- visor: G. Finances 1. Approved project expenditures: a. Youth Salaries b. Youth Personnel Benefits c. Supervisory Personnel Services d. Supervisory Personnel Benefits e. Travel f. Office Supplies g. Other: (list: h. TOTAL 2. Local Share: 3. State Share: II. NARRATIVE $34,310-84, i 12„008.7 4 22„302.05, Please answer the foilaJing questions on separate pages and attach toLisp report:• i i I A. List program objectives, standards used to measure objectives and to what extent program objectives were met, if objecti0es werei nat met, why and what program changes will be made in the future to meet these objece.i ves? B. List all.strengths and weaknesses of your program. What can be done to strengthen your program'in the future? C. List each work station used, a job' description, for each position and number of youth employed by each work station.in each positron: , Jot, Classification Work Station Plumber of Youth Maintenance Person 1) East Junior High 2) City of Maple Creek 3) Local Church D. Planning and Review Committees - Please attach a schedule of meetings held during the school year and a list of the members. What role did the Committee'play In the project?. How ao you plan to utillze•'the Committee in the future? E. What new or innovative activities have been tried with the project this year in the follow,Ing areas: 1. Recruitment policies and procedures 2. Work experience i 3. Cultural and educational activities 4. Follow-up procedures foe terminated youth Will these activities be intergrated Into the program In the future? F. Who should be contracted if'additional information regarding the project is required? (name, address, and telephone number) G. Please attach any questionnaires and their results administered to youth enrollees and/or work supervisors., H. Describe the recommendations you would suggest for State gu:ideiihes governing the GYOP and/or the State Committee's role in the, Governor's Youth Opportunity Program. , ]. Attach any case histories of GYOP youth that you feel would be of interest. ;) III. CERTIFICATION / Rev. Rohert. Aolzl aavnor (Typed Name) recur e) Chairman, Planning & Review Committee Joan Van Steenhuyse irl i U��XJ it (Typed Mame) ignature) ' Person Authorized to Sign for I• ' Sponsoring Agenoy /gyro / (Date) Sponsoring Agency) II. Narrative A) G'_;)otives: Vo objectives of the Mayor's Youth ::mployment Progra,-I are as follows; 1. To provi'3 meaningful employment opportunities and work experience for socio -economical deprived youth in Johnson County. '. To provide special assistance to socio-000nomically deprived yout;: in Johnson County. 3. To augment the employment opportunities with special services s .-I as employment counseling, vocational and career counseling. !•. To expose socio -economically deprived Johnson County youth to alternative cultural and social situations, such as concerts, n11;,3. and other educational field trips. 5. To provide job traininF, for socio -economically deprived youth of Johnson County. 6. Develop positive work attitudes and work habits. Heasurement of Objnctives a. 1•ianagement by Objectives has become an integral part of the t[ayor's Youth Employment Program. There are specific goals set down for th3 program and, thus a means of evaluating the program, j•Fork 'sites :•rare visited 90 of the time prior to placement of an M.Y.E.P. a- p?oyee. Enrollees and supervisors were informed, of the godl.9 of the program. Statistics included in this report indicate that there vera various jobsites provided for youth. Jobs were developed, based solely on the interests and abilities of the young person, and the need and the interest of the work site supervisor. stork sites were screened for good supervision. Feedback collected. indicated supervisors were better informc2 of the programs goals and were better satisfied with tha 197;-1971 management of M.Y.E.P. than in the past three years. b. :special assistance was provid-+d to socia -economically deprived yout:-.. The presenting problem of each youth and their reason for see;ki..a emr.loyment was indentified. !:.Y.3.P. helped to outline goals fo. each adolescent for whom emplo ment was provided. Services pro:-ided bV the staff included counseling, problem -solving, and referid-ni youth to appropriate agencies in the community. Enrollees enjoyed the c•;ee%iy folloo-r-up becauso they felt the staff was supportive and they, wara to develop a honest and trustiry relationship with the staff. c. All enrollees prior to placement at a jobsite vera involved in quite extensive employment counseling. The importance of a job was stressed to each participant. The basic responsibilities of an employee were explained to each participant along with the general responsibiliios of j a supervisor and the U.Y.E.P. director to each participant. In the Id Y.E,P, director and the young person initial interview between the were interested in was quite evident to determine t:1ose youth that working. Only those youth expressing an interest were employed by M. Y.E. Initial communication and sharing of ideas ,rare established which formod the basic structure to dsvelop a solid iuter-personal i. relationship for the remainder of the school year. The staff encouraged career and emplo;nn3nt counseling sessions between each program partiainant and the Ir'.Y.E.P. director. Self Directed Search was administered anal re- sults more shared with go; of the pa d. Cultural and Educational activities were very limited. Enrollees ex - see more activities. A picniczrh31d pressed that they would like to at the end of the school year and all participants who came enjoyed themselves. Cultural events were unfortunately difficult to attend dee to a shortage of funds. The I•tayorps Committee felt that all funds that were avaiable be spent strictly on youth salaries. There will be more activities planned such as picnics and groups getting touether to talk. �e. Enrollees were placed in jobs where there was an actual need for work and where they would receive good supervision. An essential component of the program is that the work be stimulatingand non -:menial. X.......P- enables youth to acquire work experience which will aide them in Obtaining work in the private sector. 7 enrollees of the program were ablq,to se, j curq non -subsidized employment in the private sector. This success,can be attributed to the training they received through the private alnEnoolF}lts• were encouraged and supported in locating and, obtaining p Pl y' This males the youth more assertive and, allows them to enter the actual "world of work." It also alleviates the problem of turning down_ other young peohple who could benefit from the program.., tt tt f' parse andahisaac�usiepar ormancewon xesj ong Tlie i�ofk3aF�1di-eGioras wane each enroll.eeon a weekly basis to evaluate their job performance., An evaluation was administered to work site supervisors twice during the year. Enrollees also completed an evaluation about their job, supervisor, and M.Y.E.P. director, Results of both evaluations were discussed with the enrollees and supervisors, These evaluations were helpful in determining the enrollees actual performance on the job. Supervisors also gave helpful feedback about the M.Y.E'.P. 3) STi2i,GTHS: List strenghts and weaknesses of program. 1. Good job sites developed in Iowa City. Due to the University of Iowa, there are many diverse job opportunities avaiable to the youth. 2. Supervisors who are supportive and care about the program and the enrollee as a parson. 3. Challenging initial interview and employment counseling prior to, placeTert. 4. Trust e.nd friendship daveloped bet.reen the staff and enrollees. 5, More contact :and foll,osr-up gith referral agents has developed. i) n 6, y -phasic on seeking non -subsidized employmant in the private sector„ Ycuth are becoming familiar with Job Service of Iowa whon seeking e: ployment. 7. Performance on the job is a crucial factor and determines if the enrollee should maintain tate job. 9. A .a a realistic work orientation whin youth are enrolled or terminatad fr) the program. .I?:uS3 tutlD CHA\G&S SULIGHT: _ Furt'%er clarification of the objectives of the program to potential c,or:c sites and supervisors. 2. The ::3cd to develop more non-subsidizad jobs in the private sector to allow now enrollees in the program. 3. More cortact with t::3 enrollea's parents concerning their feelings about work, allowing more awareness of family problems which directly affect a young p3rson's performance on the job. 4. The nead to develop more stimulating cultural and educational activities. 5. Setting a definite time limit that a youth can be on the program„ C) Job Classification School :-.aintenance Secretary La:; AzzIstant Cli :_- As::istarts lork Station Southeast Junior Hizh Northwest Junior High Mark TwELin Longfellow Horace Mann Solon High School Clear Creek High School itnbc; of Yo ut' 1 1 is Civic Center 2 t Chicano. -Indian Center 1 :domen's Resource Center 1 Board Of Education 1 HACAP 1 r� Oxford kaementary 1 �Javy Recruiting Offioa 1 i A -W Recruiting Offiiae 2 a 'I Air Force Recruiting Office 1 = '� Erma Goldori.n Clinic 1 Iowa Hwanities Program 2 Visiting T7ui.-Ws Association 1 Computer Center 1 it R '( Free 'Led; cal Clinic 2 i I', D Job Clessiftcation ';nor.• Station humbek^ of Child ;are loadstart Coral Nursery 1 �ar17 Childhood sducatio.i Center 1 Nelson Day. Center 1 ?Terra 1 ;,ucha.:ic/.aintonance Io-ra Cit- Service Building 3 City Park 1 Car a war%' 3Jfrs Lut',.eran Group one 1 United Action for Youth 1 Ani..il Caretaker Ani -al Shelter Cite Zoo 1 Pati --t 5 :rvices Mercy Hospital 1 Li'rary Assistants oxford Ll3men'tary ? Fublic Library(Iowa City) 3 Mar:: IV Community Center 1 :1u*.ws 3liting Daily Iowan. 1 Cuatodian at.ional Guard Office 2 . i.11owind School Hoadstart 1 Faith United Church 1 ^"^,.)ti on Aides ..-ark IV Community Center ? Iowa City Recreation Cantor 1 Teacher :,ida Solon if:iga School 1 X) The Flarning i• F.eview Co+tiitta met .: a +-5 :week basis. The membarsh;p Of tc:3 Co=dt'tee consisted of the following: Robert Holzha:a^=r, (Chairparson) ;-.gLrLa Joan dillians, Sc -L:).)' of Social :iorl- 3) .. 3ernard C. Barber, (Sscra'ily/Troasurer) Job Ser.ice of Iowa IN) I._. Day. Johanso•i, Csrt_fioA Fi:lic accountant $) .,r. Kaith Iiaefer, Cha. -tier of Co.i^arca F) :: Floranc3 Stocl;nan, Service Ad.nlnistrator, J3hnsz i County Dept. of Social 3 ar:'ic as 7) Ur. Richard Lahr, Io:ra Cit.,, 3c'u331 .roard a, :.s. Jean3tte Cartor, Iowa City F-i'.,lic Librar, q Linda Screibor, Ad-tinistrativo Assistaht to City of Ioua City '_C) Lr. John Cazin, Iowa City School Board The conritt3o is n3:w a recognized 33ard of the City of Iuwa Cit;,. The 3oard helped to analyze and meet t':, needs of Johnson County wit's rejard to Yout'" a•pl0',"ent. Thiy helped plan appropriate strategiRs to me3tn thasa needs, e u^ in ,n o:.Joinn process, reviewed and directed the program so that it :ni_ht continue to ba effective. The boar! -till. be responsible for the eval,uatian of t',,e i-ngram and the p3ra)nn)), assist in t'ind raising, becone involy-*A- in the area of legislation, and appoint t , director of the program. Major corcorn is ti:3 development of non-s•i.,sidize-, jobs in t?se ,private sector. ' ;) Newor Innovative Activities tried wit'this project: 1) Recruitment policies and procedures with more formal interviquin3, nothod--wit: emphasis on enploynon` counseling. Supervisor ha.rir-, thi option to interview the onrollee prior to placement. 2) dor?. Bxporieice- setting up an I,ifornal contract or conenitmen't bet -Man tle y,uth anO the jog. 3) Cultural an' 3ducational Activities- diractor attended enrollee's staff meetings on the job. A,' -picnic was held and all participants L-ro-j ht thei'= own sack lurich. It i. -as a time enrollees and tha eta` - co, -,la interact outside the job and coule enjoy recreational activities oi�ah as volleyball end horse shoes. Gtaer cultural events were unfortunately difficult to -attend due tc a shortage o` funds. The Mayor's Co:,,nittee felt that all,fur„ds that were available be spent strictly on youth salaries. 10 Follow-up procedures for terminated youth- termination fora"were completed on each enrollee leaving the program. Youth terminated wsra contacted by phone, some called the director to seek assistejiance in securing employment through Jab Service. More follow-up is 1eeded and with the help of a part time staff person this goal will be met. The above activities will be intergrated into the next project aloe; with innovative ideas in these areas. F) If more information is required re"arding this projoct, contact Joan Van Stasnhyyse 1810 Lower Muscatine Iowa City, Iowa 52240 Phone. 351-1035 E) Being a new director of a G.Y.O.P. projects I recommend that the State Committae sponsor workshops or meetings on a regular basis for 'rroject directors and other staff. This would allo'; us to bacon.-. familiar :cit`e successas and failures experienced by other projects tnr-)ughout the state. Innovative ideas could be developed and discussed to assist each director in the management of their project. Also, I would appreciate arc/ in -formation in regard to seminars, lectures which would be beneficial for the pro. -race, but also for personal gro•:rth.. z INIPW5N �i TF1 2 3 4 8AM-Magistrates 5 8:30AM-Housing. 7 SAM -Magistrates; 8 9 Court (Chambers) 4PM-Rehab Advisory Comm (Eng Conf Rm) Court (Chambers) 1:30PM-Informal Board (Conf Rm) 2PMoMeetin ren 7-3oPM-P&Z'Formal (Chambers) Council (Conf Rm) Cemetery Ord 7:30PM-P&Z Informal (Conf Rm •30PM-Council (Chambers) (Chambers) 4PM-Committee on Community Needs (Rec Center) --^ X10 11 12 3 14 8AM-Ma istrates 15 16 . 8AM-Magistrates Court (Pambers); Court (Chambers) 8AM-Sign Ordinance (Conf Room) 30PM-IIof rural Council (�oni Rm) 30PM-Council 3PM-Riverfront Cam (Chambers) (Conf Rm) 7;30PM^Parks & Rec 7;30PM-Comp•Plan Coma (Rec Center) Coord Committee (Conf Room) •17 18 19 20 8:30AM-Housing 21 8AM-Magistrates 22 23 ommMtg. court (Chamber's) 8AM-Magistrates mSpecial Formal, Court (Chambers) (Chambers) (Chambers) 1:30PM-informal Council (Conf Rm 7:30PM-Council 4PM-U.A.Y. (Friend Meeting Rouse) ` p s 7:30PM-P&Z (Chambers) 7:30PM-Ai ort; Coni Informal (Conf (Eng ContCon�Room) i X24 25 SAM -Magistrates 26 7 28 8AM-Magqistr&t,e Court (C,hamberstj; 9, Court (Chambers) 3:30PM-Hoard of 1:30PM-Informal Adjusbnent AM -Sign C,rdinanGe (Conf Rogm) Council (Conf Rm) 4PM-lfa ores youth 7:30PM-Council (Chambers) (Chambers) 15PM-Library ad. (Vinity rico- (Lab Aud;toraum) pal Church) 30PM-Com Plan 7:30PM-Human Rel Coord CortmutteeS' Come (Conf Room) (Conf Rq'm)All Sp F d G1 u V C Punpoae: THE PURPOSE OF THIS NEWSLETTER is to enhanceca close tion ` between youth -serving agencies and to promote ship between these agencies. relation The Newsletter will bed the t, week of each The Newsletter Committeeumeet emthi onthl;yto reV ew articles submitted for publication. Persons Wishing to ,sentheir contributions or items of information ara cdLibaary� 307li;ast Cot 'liege ns to Judy Kelley., Iowa City to ttee member, Iowa City -- Phone 354-1264, or any r � kre invited. It is Your articles, comments and teeetl�iwj5otla111viewpoints should be the concensus of the Commit: ressed Herein do not necessarily printed, and the, opinions exp represent those of the Newsletter Coj mittee. NEWSLETTt:R COMhI1•TrEF MEhIBERS: Judy 'Kel�ey> Iowa City SPuCbltiy ublic Li racy; .ean pecxor,da Carol Finn; Lois Keri;, Johnson County Department of Social ServiceT�s?Youth Emploaaen 1Pro Iowa City;_ Joan Van Steenhuyse.,. May . . gram; Diane Dennis, high .school s ent; Sue Bozek, Iowa City Public Schools. The next meeting of the Newsletter Committee will be pionday, October 11, at 5:00 P.M. -Please-contact Committee members: with changes, items of interest, articles and information prior to that time. IN RESPONSE; "WHERE CAN.KIDS GOV' The gollowing,replies have been received to our in<luiry: Mercer, Park City Park Iowa,City Recreation Center U,A.Y. Four Cushions Pentacrest s�ateland Bowling Lanes Reservoir Lake McBride game rooms D�auta. s •eating establishments with . School playgrounds for liaskgtbajl and football ]?ublic.Libraiy Coralville Recreation Centel ¢)anther. Auditorim for carious events tadium and recreation center m. &:q w; a 0 U m: a p U ,,�L 41A 0 �o co ami Cd 4JN O Y. 4j 4H r+ m Cd 0.00 HSM U of I Fieldliouse , s .. .. Commmity. Tha;atreimusicals and West and City High,School,games, rode.tions To a_friend's house (downtown) The Fieldhouse University of. Iowa tennis courts The Mall Quail eek or Finkbine GolCf Courses Cr "Mope around town" sa Swimming .n Listen to music 41 Home m. &:q w; a 0 U m: a p U ,,�L 41A 0 �o co ami Cd 4JN O Y. 4j 4H r+ m Cd 0.00 HSM �J' [�cr�j enin The Iona Aszoc i, a on o ` 2'4_' _o Poi? ice ,and Peace 065 is i !I 6 one nee. -t.ane''DenW-. This Conference was head at t}e Highlander Inn here in Iowan I� City on September 7, 8 and 9. During the business meeting on Thursday,.September 9, the -officers chose the members to�r� head the,2ACP$PO for the next'year. One of the Toia, City Police Officers, Seprgeant Tom,Crowley, was chosen AS the 4t: ; Vice President. The Iowa City Police Department .id the Ic ai City Police Explorer Post #222 are proud tO be. associated , th Sgt. Crowley. A lot of very hard work went, into M,Iiking th:'l 4 a very successful convt,ntiliii. Police Detective Bili Kidwell and Sgt. Tom Crowley otganliied the com✓ention. The Convention was a good opportunity for officers of the different police departments. around Towa,to compare notes and to et to know ea.cli otlper, I enjoyed my job as an Exp?l rer working At the convention. Ma#y law enforcement equipment, salesmen attended the convention to demonstrate their produilmL The entertainment for the •three-day conference was provided "This Side Up." l Fatha.John Powdt will speak at the., Memorial Union, First il� ;y�-�` Floor, " on October 17 at 8:bO P.M. Many yoi�tg peaple have :rj�,ad `rlie his books, The Secret of "Fillip in !Love, Wh Am I Afraid itlp- Tell you Who n� He oWched M. Acurd5sion PROGRAMS AWD SERVICES: Rape Awa,%ene64 and PheventEoA-Week r Iowa City Mayor Mary Neuhauiser declared the week of Septeiffi 27' + to October 2 as ),tape Aiaare!ness and Prevention Weelt: Unive't' qty Iona of Ia President Willard Boyd also,gave his support. The, eek is sponsored by a special co6ittee in conjunction with thi Raper victim Advocacy Program, and includes members from social ;s and helping agencies in the county, city aiid on -campus. r1114s. organized through all, -out comrriunity ;effort$. Goals for Rape Awareness and, Preveniion Week include the 0asing ! of public awareness regarding' the problem of rape,; the fam 14ri; zation of participants of the program with the protocols a I pro- cedures of repo;ting and prose'cutin incidents, the increas d; I -A utilization of existing services available•to rape victims;{ -and the generation of discussion and distribution of informatiio con- cerning preventative measu'res.. I j Activities include panel discussions with ;representatives` y Mm the Iowa CitPolice Department, Johnson County S�ieriff"s i` part - Ment, and the Rape Victim Advocacy Program; film Presentat �ns; seif -defense demonstrations; and a production by at the fd ti of " the mountain, a women's theater group from Minneapolis, �et�Sotay.'. V y• Boot i� s are set up at key locatioris in the count for infox �,tfin- ori� �'� distribution. A special brochure including infoi-oation co cern what to' do if you 'are raped or if someone you know. is raper and including. referral numbers and facts, and myths about rape .II e available. 2 I ' 0 11 PROGRA14S AND SERVICES continued Mone on Rape_Auanenedc and Pneven,tion Week The week's activities will conclude with.a day -long conference on rape: .Workshops held duripg this; conference include law enforcement, medical aspects., legal asPects, child abuse, counseling, self-defense, crisis intervention, and Women's law. Speakers include Senator Minnette, Doderer, Dr. Charles &Prosse from University Hospitals, Joinnson County A,ttorne;t Jack Dooley, and Yirla Fultz from Polk County Attorney's Office. Ja4le MacMillan, Co -Founder of the '.E.Q.A.R: Newsletter and the: Washington, D.C. Rape Crisis Center spoke on Crisis Iinteryention, and SUe.Leneartes. Self -Defense Coordinator, of the Washington, D..C. Rage Crisis Center gave a sdif-defense demonstration. Iowa C„4ty Fue, Medicat ,e wic The Free Medical Clinic is a non-profit, community -oriented, free health clinic. The .Clinic has no admission requirerj@ants. We serve people without regard to age, marital status, race or sex: 'there is no charge for :services received at the Clinic. These services include job physicals, pap tests, birth control methods and information, marriage:,blood tests, VD testing, and treatmant, treatment of routiAe, i7,lness, and much>more. The care you receive at the Free, Medical,'Clinic is kept completely confidential. Your.medical re, cords are available: to, no one. but you:. The Clinic is open to see patients on Monday and Thursday nights.' We begin seeing patients at 7,OQ 3'.M1, and you can,sign up any- time after 6:15 P.M. We -see patients in the order that you sign up. We're located at 7,20 North;Dubuque Street in thG basement of Wesley House. Our office is open froijt 9:OO.Fi,M, - 2:00 P hL, Monday through Friday for follow-up, clerical Work, medical record-keeping, etc. (We treat patients only in the evenings .n Monday and '14rsday.) If you have further qugstions,, please call us at .; MORE PROGRAMS Emma Got&Aan CP,% S- (contcnued) schogl age AND SERVICES h and higlh Classes for young women of junior high and oinclude discussions selected on women ted by 'thesgroup heaitifi'care, reproductive system, on request. Speakers are available to schools uP on such topics as The Clinic maintains a pamphlet library' bur bxeastsx DES,, urinary -tract infections, how to exaunine Y check -,ups, iminijig-after pill, pap smear g1xide, VIY� infectible meriopaus abortion. These panr�hlets ar`e available r all, The Clink highly recommends purchasing the book "�_'T�:s Ourselves" written to and for women by Boston Women's a reO�i Boo o ;lective. It can'be puxchas'ed through them at a reduced cost of $2.50. Confidentiality is assured. Telephone 337-2111. wthni ht, AneAA louu Sej vw ce Box 13 _ __ .. ant Women.. Birthright serves as a supportive "Provides to any pregnant on legal us regnancy tests;'Prov>des informs Call offers anonym pregnancy jab's, adoption, if desired, and medthrodgh Thursday nights, 600'` 9:00 F.M. X351 -8A Positive Monday Volunteers can be contacted other times i£ necessary. alternative to abortion! In o�unat%ori and Re en�w� S¢tiv.i.ce and United Way_ Although it was necessary to eT:iminate 's Information Ana Referral Service is still alive n. County. ro am, the essenti�i Well in Jbhnsq rimar�.ly a referral a full-time staff person as of the p ri re?Hain. We. are Plannijig tool for components bf the program for a yaxticular seYv, but the program Is'a'lso used as a P United Way. For example, if we'get'calls asking we can alert agencies at to the not available in John County call £or assistance to the need. Our .calls range fx'.om_someone who needs a:.• dermist to stuff a pet he pho e• niuifbere to a ois1338-7823 and ifwe- can with a depression. ood that we can find someone who call be of Sae , ce the odds are'g Pats pxo9hm. The Pals Program now has 63• active matches and t �, t gr-j.,e list 2$ boys and one girl. Turn out at summer volun.-responsee to0o1 was very small, but there sleem.9 to be increasing P advertising as fall approacXies, < clew; that the+ in examining our waiting list statistics•, it r e other need is for male volunteers.-Referra-s of girls, on th hand, have he nqTbers of interested feml barely kept PacegT Conator,y encouragesage' volunteers. Julie Zimmer, children. As a to keep,this imbalance, in Hund when referring 4 PROGRAMS: n Mone on PALS Pnognam 0 youth worker, you might .examine more closely the needs of ,any girls ,you work with to see if' they couid .benefit from a '!Big, Sister. Boys whose- nett for dd#,h'ni(15nship can be met bya female yolunteep can be placed much earlier than, those needing a male Val, so consider that ol)fioii also. STAFF CHANGES: Judy Soehama, former supervisor of the Speciai Poptlatidns Involvement .(SP1) Program at the Iowa City Recreation Center has moved to Boston, Jars Lown. is,n6w-:the recreation suPervisor in charge of the therapeu— t� c ribcre tion program, Si'I, Joe CuttZ6 has replaced;JuLtyI 1=ici tach .as supervisor; o'£ Johhson County Department of Social SerrvicesI Adolescents' Unit ow August 23, ]976, Joe comes from gFaduate school and the Wapello County Department of Social Services.' In addition to supervisory work, he will work directly with , number of clients. VOLUNTEER OPPORTUNITIES:. Tutou Needed! United Action for Youth i$ looking'for tutors to work with junior or, senior high school s•tuMlitt. If you are interested or 7qq),? of someone who is, call or stop by the U.A.,Y, office at 311 Vorth Linn, telephone 338-7518: NE(V AT THE LIBRARY Ckcuanoom P&o1eet6 USing, PhotoqAanhy. Eastman Kodak Company, 1975,.. Volume,,l is or the elementary school leveli Volume 2 is for •the secondary school bevel.` Cxiod ideas with clean instructions and evaluations for anyone working with photography .and young persons. I Can Be Anything: CakeeAz and. Cotteq'ea Aon Young women; by Joyce .Slayton, Mit ec ll. '4.,1975 331..702 lit., Brier sketches. of 90 occupations, repres,enting'a cross-section of both traditional and nontraditiona'� careers.. In addition, to the standard data on vocations, this volume includes such addi- tional information as notes on which colleges and Vaduate schools have awarded the, most degrees to women in a particular field, on how many women there are in the field, and on ho!w a particular career fits in with child 'nearing,. Ou)L Bodiea OuwueCveu; A Bo h, 6 and Pbh (Vomen, 2nd edition. c.l 7 301.1 os, Completely revise anexpanded,. by the. Boston Women's Health Collective. 6 THE LIBRARY (cowtinuedl c, 1976 158.1/Gla- NEW ATn by Glasser. ve Addti 1QilThdj ostulates-, a Pob Thera + this book P activities e au o P{Realit ane s life through eo le v t strengt.ening es. Glasser believes and suggests theory Os�tiye experien4 ositive way which are to ne ative sd_d_ict}ons who participate become addicted in a p that these addictions could be solutions $ FROM THE PAMPHLET f1LE; SCHOOLS; £ro>n t e o ,t4 b Sue Boz'eh mach to.Educate-000t 0�l h" y this -fall New A —�— is being initiated state Ograe high school p?o.gra>R rili exist as a sep- enter. An.alternatiY. o6ls,., The pr:,.., , imental Educauontielieves in Iowa City Ste•. the Comm ity ;Exp am coordinator, ... I school said ?s called- author and progr tive methods of Ron Eide, the curYW 1 provide the.alterna ," E.C. cessarYfor Iowa Crt, to "PrOvIde education ,EOr that the C.E oath." instruction nectrUM of its y the entire sp is; of h?s e osurE; �s designed by, Fon. Fide on: the bash and his xp. The C,B-B-q wh the C.O:R.E., program at West t t he art. 4f the ducatid0al Programs A et cies or per- experience.wit order,'I tive e thxee comp tex in to other alterna culum are thirty. r ared t°,mss h be instructional cui s indents, will be e0. which t The students' PxogTeSs Will formance tasks cxedst ah courses to graduate from the school• of their progress. recorded throughouhe basis ni ollinent an led at th, be determined On e enrol' roxin�ately t4enty=fide. stbdeae e�ned when the: nes decisions ori further fundin> Currently, aT?P but the schc C.E..C, and increased.enrollinent wil i s no,t yet been establishoa, Center: Iowa City School District final' rood Learznng:., A permanent location ha out of thfY ing lishmerlt rarily operating _ for t!1e emag� from is tempo tx e high school, P g'C. and the School District also.,aprOti`es .h use both tYie C E E; „ se arate,alterna .V f E!C:)a becst cli could, ° �p,S. 5ou may tion about 'the sted,ouq in ft?rther irifgrma Center :or is ma)r Those who are intexq lie ICi rkwood Learning ,,l counselors�� be: rd of -on ide at, t,. Ajl high schoq Y contact Ron the Boa.. cation of;Eice, contacted also • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF IOWA CITY, IOWA FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED ,JUNE? 30, 1976 PREPARED BY: DEPARIMNr OF FINANCE CITY OF IOWA CITY, IOWA September, 1976 ' CITY OF IOWA CITY ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT ' TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTORY SECTION ' City Officials and Staff Letter of Transmittal Opinion of Certified Public Accountants ' Report of CPA on Internal Accounting Control and Other Recommendations II. FINANCIAL SECTION ' Statement of Budgeted $ Actual Receipts by 'type. . . . . . . . . I Statement of Budgeted $ Actual Receipts by Fund. . . . . 2 Statement of Budgeted $ Actual Disbursements by Type . . . . . . . 3 ' Statement of Budgeted F, Actual Disbursements by Fund4 . « Summary Statement of Fund Transactions . . . Summary of Receipts 5 Summary of Disbursements . . I1 . ' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Summary of Transactions Between Funds. . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 23 Statements of Transactions by Fund: General Fund: Administration Program. 25 25 Community Development Program . . . . • . . . . Public Safety Program . . 31 34 ' Transportation Program . • . . . . . . . • . . . , Environmental Protection Program . . . . • , • 37 . Leisure $ Cultural Opportunities Program . 42 45 Debt Service Fund . . . . . . . . . ' . . . . . . . . . . Capital Projects Funds . . . 48 . . , , , , . . . . . Enterprise Funds: . . . . 5a ' . . . . . . . . . . . Parking Revenue Fund . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54 . . . . 55 Sewer Revenue Funds57' Water Revenue Funds . . ' . . . . . . . . Trust 6 Agency Funds, . Pension $ Retirement Fund 61 65 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66 General Revenue Sharing Fund . . . . . . . . . .67 Escrow Funds Transit Replacement Fund . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69 . . . . 71 Intragovernmental Service Funds . . . . . . . . . . ' 72 Special Assessment Funds . . . . . Special Revenue Funds:' 76 Community Development Block Grant Program Fund . . . . . . . . . 78 ' . ' ' 79 Road Use Tax Fund i'........ . . . . . . . ' Urban Renewal Funds . ' ' ' 80 Low Rent Flossing Funds 81 ............ Industrial Development Revenue Bond Fund . . . . . . .83 82 . . ' Police & Fire Pension $ Retirement Funds . Summary of Investments by Fund • . • . . . . . 84 . . . . . . Statement of Securities Transactions • • • . . . . . ,86 . . . . 85 . . Schedule of Fund Balances by Type • • . . . . . . . . . 99 r I 1 '1 J IP 11 TABLE OF CONTENTS -2- III. STATISTICAL SECTION General Government Expenditures By Function . . . . . . . . . 101 General Governmental Expenditure by Program . . . . . 102 General Governmental Revenue by Source - Calendar Year. . . . 103 General Governmental Revenue by Source - Fiscal Year. . 104 Property Tax Levies and Collection . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105 Assessed and Actual Value of Taxable Propert).. . . . . . . . 105 Property Tax Rates per 1000 Assessed Valuation . . . . . . . 106 Property Tax Receipt by Function . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107 Property Tax Receipt by Program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 108 Computation of Legal Debt Margin . . . . . . . . . . . . 109 Ratio of Net General Bonded Debt to Assessed Value and Net Bonded Debt per Capita . . . . . . . . . . . . 110 Computation of Direct and Overlapping Debt . . . . 110 Ratio of Annual Debt Service Expenditures for General Bonded Debt to Total General Expenditures . . . . . . . . . 111 Summary of Bonded Indebtedness . . . . . . . . . . . 112 Debt Service Requirements to Maturity - Total . . . . . . . . 114 Debt Service Requirements to Maturity - Bond Face Value . . . 115 Debt Service Requirements to Maturity - Coupon Value. . . . . 116 Provisions Relating to Debt Service . . . . . . . . . . . ., . 117 Schedule of Revenue Bond Coverage . . . . . . . . . . 118 Average Daily Cash Balance - Calendar Year . . . . . . . . . 119 Return on Available Cash - Calendar Year. . . . . . . . . . .'119 Average Daily Cash,Balance - Fiscal Year . . . . . . . . . . 120 Return on Available Cash - Fiscal Year . . . . . . . . . . . 12Q Urban Renewal R-14 - Project Costs to Date . . . . 121 Urban Renewal R-14 - Statement of Financial Condition . . . . 122 Housing Authority - Low Rent Housing Program Section 23 - Operating Receipts and Expenditures . . . . . 123 Section 23 - Statement of Financial Condition . . . . . . . 124 Section 8 - Operating Receipts $ Expenditures . . . . . . 125 Section 8 - Statement of Financial Condition . . . . . . 126 Schedule of Insurance in Force . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 127 Miscellaneous Statistical Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 128 CITY OF IO{VA CITY, IOWA CITY�OUNCIL Mary C. Neuhauser Mayor John Balmer Carol deProsse David Perret L. P. Foster Max Selzer Robert Vevera CICI=aMGBR Neal G. Berlin DEPARTMENT OF FIDWNCE Harvey Miller Acting Director Debbie Rauh Controller Nancy Heaton Treasurer U o �I.•I-Iys—J' ,/ �� �• / CMC CENTER. W WA52240 ST. • � � • C/4��f� /�- � � IOIOWA CITY. 522V0 F �,1 'y' 7 v%/ 319354iB00 e �VVJJJ VV � C IOWA ;CttY, IOWA• ,w;a, pv September 26, 1976 I To the Honorable Mayor, Councilmembers, and City Manager: The annual financial report of the City of Iowa City, Iowa for the fiscal period ended June 30, 1976 is submitted herewith in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 384 of the Code of Iowa, 1975. ACCOUNTING SYSTEM AND REPORTS The City of Iowa City's accounting records are maintained on a cash basis, revenues being recorded when received and expenditures being recorded when paid. Budgetary control is maintained on a fully automated accounting system. This system provides monthly reports for ' management review of activities to avoid over -expenditures during the fiscal year. The basic system of budgeting and accounting utilized by the City involves the allocation of revenues and expenditures to specific funds established for programs and functions having similar purposes. Most of the City's operating functions are accounted for within the General Fund by program, ' These programs are: Administration, Community Development, Public Safety, Transportation, Environmental Protection, and Leisure & Cultural Qppor- tunities. Operating functions within the General Fund are subject to a tax limitation of $8.10 per $1000 of actual property value. Tort Liability within the General Fund, the Debt Service Fund, and the Pension & Retirem;ent Fund are outside of this tax limitation. All financial activities and functions of the City are conducted within the classifications required by the Code of Iowa, Chapter 374, and have been reported by fund in the financial section of this report. The National I Committee on Governmental Accounting of the Municipal Finance Officers Association of the United States and Canada has established standards of financial reporting for governmental agencies. This report has been prepared in a general format suggested by that committee. GENERAL GOVERNMENTAL FUNCTIONS General governmental functions include those activities which are performed within the programs of the General Fund, the Debt Service Fund, and the Pension & Retirement Fund. Revenues for these activities during FY 76 total $7,377,065 as compared to $7,896,930 in FY 75, The decrease of revenues ' Mayor, Councilmembers & City Manager -2- September 28, 1.976 Actual valuations for FY 76 amounted to $354.5 million as compared to $313.1 million in the previous fiscal year. Current tax collections were 101.5% of the total property tax levy compared with 99.1% in the previous 18 month period. Taxes collected during FY 76 were at a rate of $10.951 per $1000 of valuation compared to a converted rate of $11.42 for the special 18 month period ended June 30, 1975. Expenditures for general governmental purposes in FY 76 totaled $7,801,892, an increase of 7.8% over FY 75. The following chart displays expenditures for governmental purposes by fund and program and the percentage of total expenditures. ' supporting expenditures for general governmental purposes is due to the ' utilization of a Road Use Tax balance in the Street Maintenance System 15.9 function within the General Fund. The tax collections varied by .4% ' between the two fiscal periods. A fiscal year comparison of the of revenue from various sources and the amount; 20.4 Opportunities ' percentage of total revenue is 1Q.3 presented on the following chart: 7.8 582,671 7.5 ' 11.5 1,035,730 131.3 705,501 9.7 942,481 REVENUE SOURCES FY 75 % - FY 76 % Taxes $4,518,917 57.2 $4,193,843 56.8 Licenses & Permits 145,991 1.8 192,938 2.6 Fines & Forfeitures 194,012 2.5 237,714 3.2 ' Charges for Services Intergovernmental Receipts 546,837 1,907,798 6.9 24.2 660,681 9.0 1,228,663 16.7 Use of Money & Property 144,929 1.8 96,799 1.3 Miscellaneous Receipts 173,436 2.2 103,477 1.4 ' Transfers In 265,010 3.4 662,950 9.0 TOTAL $7,896,930 100.0 17,377,065 100.0 Actual valuations for FY 76 amounted to $354.5 million as compared to $313.1 million in the previous fiscal year. Current tax collections were 101.5% of the total property tax levy compared with 99.1% in the previous 18 month period. Taxes collected during FY 76 were at a rate of $10.951 per $1000 of valuation compared to a converted rate of $11.42 for the special 18 month period ended June 30, 1975. Expenditures for general governmental purposes in FY 76 totaled $7,801,892, an increase of 7.8% over FY 75. The following chart displays expenditures for governmental purposes by fund and program and the percentage of total expenditures. ' EXPENDITURES FY 76 GENERAL FUND: Administration ' Community Development 15.9 Public Safety 151.8 Transportation 5.4 Environmental Protection ' Leisure & Cultural 20.4 Opportunities ' DEBT SERVICE FUND PENSION & RETIREMENT FUND 24.1 TOTAL 1Q.3 564,761 I ,' FY 75 _% FY 76 % $1,151,831 15.9 $1,158,571 151.8 389,754 5.4 467,270 6.0 1,473,237 20.4 1,638,448 21.0 1,743,830 24.1 1,428,314 1Q.3 564,761 7.8 582,671 7.5 831,195 11.5 1,035,730 131.3 705,501 9.7 942,481 12,.1 379,451 5.2 548,407 7.0 $7,239,560 100.0 $7,801,892 100.0 I 1 Mayor, Councilmembers & _ September 28, 1976. City Manager -3 1 DEBT ADMINISTRATION 1 obligation bonds outstanding as of June 30, 1976 total $4,314,000. Bonds General Included in this amount are $1,375,000 of Water and Sanitary Sewer which are considered to be self-supporting. During the fiscal year, bonds; and $39,000 1 $739,000 of general obligation bonds; $175,000 of revenue the City of Iowa of special assessment bonds were retired. Furthermore, bonds, or special City did not issue any general obligation bonds., revenue City`s bonded indebtedness and, 1 assessment bonds during FY 76. Due to the legal debt limit for the City increased to actual property valuation, the information regarding bonded indebtedness and the $13,404,244. Detailed 109 through 118 of thio report. 1 current debt position is presented on pages City"; general obligation bonds Moody's Investors' Service has rated the 1973 Water and Sewer Revenue Bonds A. Add since November, and 1 INSURANCE Insurance coverage of the City of Iowa City is detailed on page 127 of the City of Iowa City does 1 Statistical Section of this report. Currently, the -coverage liability polii:y as not have an underlying comprehensive multi has a for general auto- reflected in last year's report. The City policy relating to streets and mobile liability but self -insures for exposures commercial excess liability sidewalks to a limit of $100,000. The umbrella $100,000. insurance of the City covers exposures over 1 PENSION & RETIREMENT SYSTEMS 1 Each month, City employees and the City contribute to retirement systems. Payments are based on wages earned. Police officers and firefighters, contribute to Police & Fire Retirement Systems respectively. They are entitled to only the amount of their contributions Plus interest prior to 1 retirement. This system has been determined by George V. Stennes & Associates, Des Moines, Iowa, to be completely actuarily sound. other City employees contribute to the Social Security system and the Iowa Public Employees 1 Retirement System (IPERS). Upon termination of public employmentq other than for retirement, these employees are only entitled to their contribution plus interest. The State of Iowa, however, provides employees the option 1 upon termination prior to retirement of "vesting" their contributions if they have been in public service for more than four continuous years. Financial information regarding these retirement systems is.presented on pages 66. and 84 of this report. i 1 1 1 ' Mayor, Councilmembers & City Manager -4- September 28, 1976 �1 INDEPENDENT AUDIT The annual audit of the books of account, financial records, and accounting transactions of the City of Iowa City for the fiscal period ended June 3q, ' 1976 has been made by McGladrey, Hansen, Dunn & Co., Certified Public Accountants. Their opinion has been included in this report. The auditor's' comments and recommendations regarding the City's accounting system are ' presented following their opinion. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ' The preparation of this report could not have been accomplished without the efficient and dedicated services of the entire staff of the Department of Finance. Appreciation is expressed to all members of the Department wbo assisted and contributed to this report's preparation. I would especially like to express by appreciation to Patrick Strabala, past Director of Finance, who coordinated and directed the preparation of this report prior ' to his leaving the City's employment. Respectfully submitted, � Harvey Miller Acting Director Department of Finance ' HM:bc 1 1 I ' MC:GLAOREY, HANSEN. DUNN 6 COMPANY CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNYANTS J To the Honorable Mayor and ' City Council Iowa City, Iowa ' We have examined the accompanying financial statements for the year ended June 30, 1976 of the funds of the City of Iowa City, Iow4-as presented on pages 1 through 100, our examination was made in accordance with generally ' accepted auditing standards and, accordingly, included such tests of the ac- counting records and such other auditing procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. ' In our opinion, the financial statements mentioned above present fairly the cash transactions of the funds of the City of Iowa City, Iowa for the year ended ' n 3 6 the arid sing the fund balances ofalllofthe dfunds cath.Tune 30,e1976,�tonaaabas;isncescompriconsistent with the preceding year. ' J U I ' Iowa City, Iowa September 20, 1976 n ' MCGLADREY, HANSEN, DUNN 6 COMPANY CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS REPORT OF CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS ON INTERNAL ACCOUNTING CONTROL AND OTHER RECOMMENDATIONS To the Honorable Mayor and City Council Iowa City, Iowa We have examined the financial statements of the funds of the City of Iowa City, Iowa for the year ended June 30, 1976 and have issued our report thereon dated September 20, 1976. As a part of our examination, we reviewed and tested the City"s system of internal accounting control to the extent we considered necessary to evaluate the system as required by generally accepted auditing standards. Linder ' these standards the purpose of such evaluation is to establish a basis for reliance thereon in determining the nature, timing, and extent of other auditing procedures that are necessary for expressing an opinion on the City's financial statements. which do not include any assets other than cash and investments or any liabilities. The objective of internal accounting control is to provide reasonable, but not absolute, assurance as to the safeguarding of assets against loss from unauthorized use or disposition, and the reliability of financial records for preparing financial statements and maintaining accountability for cash and securities. The concept of reasonable assurance recognizes that the cost of a system of internal accounting cop- trol should not exceed the benefits derived and also recognizes that the evaluation of these factors necessarily requires estimates and judgments by management. There are inherent limitations that should be recognized in considering the potential effectiveness of any system of internal accounting control. In the perfor- mance of most control procedures, errors can result from misunderstanding of instruc tions, mistakes of judgment, carelessness, or other personal factors. Control proce- dures whose effectiveness depends upon segregation of duties can be circumvented by collusion. Similarly, control procedures can be circumvented intentionally by manage- ment with respect either to the execution and recording of transactions or with respect, to the estimates and judgments required in the preparation of financial statements Further, projection of any evaluation of internal accounting control to future periods is subject to the risk that the procedures may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, and that the degree of compliance with the procedures may deteriorate, Our study and evaluation of the City's system of internal accounting control, for the year ended June 30, 1976, which was made for the purpose set forth -in the first paragraph above, was not designed for the purpose of expressing, an opinion an internal accounting control and would not necessarily disclose all weaknesses in the system. However, such study and evaluation disclosed the following conditions that we belie�yre to be material weaknesses and the corrective action proposed is mentioned in,some cases,. 1. In the receipts and expenditure area,, there are certain weaknesses in the segregation of employee duties. To strengthen internal control 14 these areas, we suggest the following: 1 (a) One person should have the responsibility for opening all mail and ' preparing an initial listing of cash receipts. (b) The person presently preparing the initial listing of receipts; is also preparing bank deposits and periodic bank reconciliations. Each of these duties should be performed by separate individuals. ' (c) In several areas the preparation of the cash receipts journal,, bill— ings, credit memos, and accounts receivable sub -ledger is done by a single individual. Each of these duties should be done by sepa- rate individuals. I I I I I I I I I I I I' (d) General journal entries can be approved by a number of individuals. One individual should be authorized to approve such adjustments. (e) Checks are presently reconciled by a senior account clerk who also affixes authorizing signatures on individual checks. These duties, should be performed by separate Individuals. 2. There has been limited internal accounting control in the areas of inven- tory and equipment. We feel that the City should establish detailed equipment records, assign responsibility for specific assets to depart- ments, and conduct periodic inventories. 3. We have previously commented on the importance of depositing receipts timely. It was noticed in the course of our examination that many de- posits by the Recreation Department were being made less than weekly. Deposits should be made more frequently. 4. It is our belief that there are significant weaknesses in the internal control of mass transit receipts. All mass transit vehicles do not presently have functioning fare counters. Individuals who count cash also prepare reconciliations and, in addition, no balancing to fare counters is performed where possible. We suggest that the City main- tain operating fare counters, assign cash counting responsibilities to the vehicle driver or supervisors, and when preparing bank deposits re- concile to fare counters. 5. Two transfers required under the various bond agreements were not made before June 30, 1976. Although this was taken care of during Septem- ber, care should be taken to make sure all bond transfers are made timely. 6. In our examination of public improvement contracts over $5,,000, we no- ticed a lack of specific guidelines in two areas. First, under what conditions may informal bids be taken without going thru the process of public advertising, written bids, public hearing and Council appro- val. Secondly, what would be the circumstances under which a specific vendor can be utilized for equipment compatibility without formal or informal bids. 7. Part II of the current city purchasing manual states that a formal bid- ding process would be followed for all purchases of more than $5,000. This is to be in addition to the policy for formal bids onublic im- provement expenditures in excess of $5,000. Several expenditures for supplies or repairs in excess of $5,000 were noticed in the,,coarse;of i F ' our examination which were not subjected to a bidding process. It is our understanding that the purchasing manual is being rewritten, and ' we suggest that this area of expenditures be fully reviewed. 8. Under the City's current purchasing manual, all bids and proposed con- tracts are to be submitted to the C:Jty's legal department for review,_ It is our understanding that pro -forma contracts are used.€or all pro- posed contracts in excess of $5,000 and that no legal review is done. We suggest that this area be reevaluated. 9. We believe that there is a lack of assigned responsibility in the area of monitoring public improvement expenditures of federal monies for compliance with federal regulations in regards to labor and safety standards acts. The regulations are explicit in their requirement of a labor standards enforcement program consisting of documented active job -site inspections and review of weekly payrolls submitted by con- tractors and sub -contractors. We suggest that separate files be es- tablished for each contract utilizing .federal funds and that a.check list be used to help monitor compliance. 10. It is required under Federal guidelines on the use of revenue sharing funds that the chief executive officer of each recipient government certify to the Secretary of the Treasury that entitlement funds have not been used as matching funds in Federal programs and that entitle- ment funds have been used only for priority expenditures. Cate should be taken to ensure that these certifications are submitted timely.. In addition to the preceding matters regarding internal accounting controls1, attgO we have the following comments and recommendations that we want to call to your tion: 1. We believe that there is a need for documenting the entire financial system and, in addition, the individual procedures that are being per- formed. This could be achieved through systems flowcharting and the creation of a formal accounting manual. 2. Consideration should be given to the use of direct deposits for pay- roll. This would eliminate the preparation and reconciliation of manor checks and strengthen internal control in this area. 3. The City should investigate the use of direct draw system for utility billings. Under this approach, individual customers would be given, advance notice of the amount due, and subsequent to this would be an automatic draw against the individualb account by their bank with a deposit being made to the City's account. 4. There is a definite need for a joint effort between the City and John;, son County on the apparent problems in accounting for and, collecting traffic and parking violations which must go through the judicial pra- I cess. Due to the numerical size of violations procesi}ed, it would - for seem imperative for the utilization of computer facilities control. ling this area at a reasonable cost. I 5. In reviewing the sidewalks and subdivision escrow fund, we found ac- counts going back to 1968 which had not been disposed of yet, which we also reported last year. These accounts should be reviewed periodically to determine their status. 6. Presently interest on sinking fund investments is recorded as receipts of the revenue fund. The interest should be recorded as receipts of the sinking fund. 7. We suggest that each special assessment be accounted for as distinctly separate funds rather than the current practice of grouping them all in one fund. If you have any questions concerning the above items or if we can be of any further service, please feel free to contact us. `_MC &a�) V�t I ' Iowa City, Iowa September 20, 1976 I II YlAthlt &L)L) K l.Cl',iAL JCVIU i i 1 i 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 FINANCIAL SFCTION i CITY OF IOWA CITY ' STATEMENT OF BUDGETED AND ACTUAL RECEIPTS BY TYPE ' Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1976 ' BUDGEP VARIANCE OVER W ERl ACTUAL_ BUDGET_ ' TAXES45,793.26 $ 4,119,634.00 $ 4,1,4 $ (663.77) Property Tax Monies and Credits 29,080.00 28,41166.2.233 28 ' OTNER RECEIPTS 6 Permits $ 140,250.00 $ 192,937.86 713.83 $ 52,687.86 34,713.83 Licenses Fines 6 Forfeitures 203,000.00 237 2,517615,,132.73 92 468.73 92,46833 Charges for Services Revenue 2,424,664.00 4,482,288.00 2, (1,866,898:,40) 12,42Q..36 intergovernmental $ Property 455,865.00 468,285.36 (2,787;906;91 Use of Money Receipts 3,002,027.00 214,120.09 Miscellaneous $ 1,824,298.00 1,566,122.78 (258__ ,175,.22) $-- TSFEILS RAN ' $16 681,106.00 'J12 005 545.74 j(4 ,675 560.26 __---. TOTAL NOTE: This statement is a comparison of budgeted receipts to actual for those ' funds which are budgeted. 1 CITY OF IOWA CITY STATUCW OF BUDGETED AND ACTUAL RECEIPTS BY RM Fiscal Year Ended Jame 30, 1976 $ 642,800.00 ACTUALt_ pmt) $ 1,078,951.72 400,461.28 1,735 ' 407.77 10013,755.29 636,033.78 1.034,414.22 $ 5,8_ 99,024_06 $ 690,820.67 CAPITAL PRO= RJ tion $ System 61,325.00 $ 393,834.00 BJDGEr ' GENERAL FUND: $ 1,062,938.00 ' Improvements Street Construction Administration DevelopnIent 448,431-00 303,190.00 22,790,00 Conm mitt' 1,725,402.00 ' Public Safety 1,206,933.00 Transportation Environmental Protection 639,805.00 1,03_ 2_ ' Leisure 0 Cultural opportunities $ +058.00 6,1--._—_— 0 c„htotal $ 642,800.00 ACTUALt_ pmt) $ 1,078,951.72 400,461.28 1,735 ' 407.77 10013,755.29 636,033.78 1.034,414.22 $ 5,8_ 99,024_06 $ 690,820.67 CAPITAL PRO= RJ tion $ System 61,325.00 $ 393,834.00 Water Park 8 Recreation Improvements $ Pollution Control Sys"m 356,837.00 ' Improvements Street Construction 1,104,851.00 123,000.00 Bridge Construction Parking Facilities Improvemet►ts 303,190.00 22,790,00 ' Landfill Improvements 4,146,664.00 Other Construction ENTERPRISE FMS: $ 297,305.00 Parking Revenue 669,373.00 Pollution Control Operations 145,285.00 Sewer Bond Reserves 1,182,587.00 Water Operations 319,626.00 Water Bond Reserves TRUST 0 AGENCY RM' Pension atd,Retiremeat *SPECIAL ASSERNDS TOTAL $ 780,123.00 $ 16,013.72 (47,9:69.72) la q05-77 (193,1;77.71) (3.771.22) 48x020.67 62,468.86 $ 1,,143.86 (139,;422.20)' 254,411.80 $ 62,847.66 (293,989.34) (111;435.72), 993,415.28 (125:000.00).: 303,819.23 629.23 . (.14) 22,789.86 128,849.66 (4,017,8 14.34);. $ 320,493.72 $ 23,188..72 672)893.18 T2: 500-0011 142,785.00 (4, 500.00 1,290,393.03 107,806.03 319,626.00 $ 787,220.71 $ 71097.71; $_ 15,949,00 $ 5 3,687.02 $16,68121015.00_ $32,00S,545.74 *New Construction and Working Capital NOTE; This statement is a comparison of budgeted receipts to actual for those fiords which are budgeted. 2 i „1 CITY OF IOWA CITY DISBUR a N s BY TYPE STAT& T OF BUDGETED AND pL-rUAL 1 Fiscal Year Bnded June 30, 1976 1WWEr � °wDGETSAL ER �-- R 1 PERSONAL S�CES 3,676,966.27 $ (194,718..73} $ 3,871,685.00 $ 77, 90.51) Salaries and Wages 586,225,00 50II,834.49 196,5b0.86) Part-time and Overtime 788,501.00 592,000.14 ( (9,430.31) j 1 pion 8 Retirement 200,357.00 190,926.69 employee Insurance I 1 94 87) cMCDITIES $ 31,600.00 $ 26,805.13 $ 71,701.6 ) Office Supplies 406,841.00 335,139.34 1 Operating Supplies 304,671.34 31,769.34 Repair F MaintenanCe 272,902.00 supplies 1 $ 667,229.00 $ 283,522.92 $ (383fi706.08) SERVICES & CHARGES 0x219.82 102,243.00 108,462.82 15 216.31) 1 professional Services 51,182.00 35,965.69 (15,100.98 Communications 132,679.00 147,779.98 4 087,34 Transportation 6, Education 332,887.34 �� P & Liability Insurance 291,800.00 128,862.22) 1 Public Utility Service 443,989.00 315,126.78 ( 3",557.86)' Repairs $ Maintenance 156,813.00 125,255.14 ( 219.28): Technical Services 141,829.00 135,609.72 4,6',4 .9 Aid to Other Agencies 122,112.00 162,602.81 1 Miscellaneous 1119,929.87 $ (53,960,13);; CAPITAL OUTLAY $ 173,890.00 $ Land roven�ents 3 056,.684.291, Structures? p 4,615,272.00 1'980,259.91 (1,7E�3,417.0911 1 $ Buildings 2,243,677.00 equipment $ 1,318,145.00 $ 1,268,257.00 $ (49,888,001,1 DEBT SERVICE_84 39 252. h5' 1 $ 1,65` �0 $_11620 t TRANSFERS 1 $18,278,652.00 $12,330 TOTAL 1 'NOTE. This statement is a comparison of budgeted disbursements, to actual for 1 those funds which are budgeted. l 3 I1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 II IJ CITY OF IOWA CITY ANO AC UAL DISMRS�rS BY FUND STATROU OF �GETID 1976 Fiscal Year Ended June 30, BUDS V �A A� C 1 1 1 ��: $ 1,2891936.00 GENERAL 546,399.00 Administrattlonnt 1,684,605.00 CoMaMitYlOPM1,775,907.00 public Safety 699,415.00 TransPortationprotection 1 070 63L' Environ LTi ltur t Opportunities893.00 Leisure$ 7$ 7 06 Subtotal $ DEBT SERVICE FUND CAPITAL MQ�C� tion $ water- SYst1m - on 1tvTovements Park .6 S Pollution Control )stem improgements t.�tion Street CO truction. is Bridge ga parking. 1 rovements Lav dfill B ction Other Constru 942,909.00 181,926.00 421,469.00 $ 1,158,570.7 $ 467,270.00 1,638,447.52 1 428,313.6;5 582,671.22 3. 03 $ 631 $ 92:481.,50 331;841.04 1,066,668.00 130,000.00 303,190.00 22,790.00 47199,721.00 yMERPRISE FJOS$ Parking Re -venae I Operations Pollution serves Sewer Boerations Water Op d Reserves water Bon TMST' fi and Reredent Pension * SPECIAL ASSES9aw FUNDS � S,an9•a8) (427.50) $ 147,618.25 $ 288,18_12 i25 864,93 1,030,71]..59 i 53,189.54 ., 22,790.00 189,334:38 389,039.00 727,323.00 95,610,00 1,3101665.00 286, 626...00 $ 7441482.00 $ 57 500-00 $18,78 6F):?.,O= $ 388,978 81 647,533.03 95 447.50 31,249,.254.17. $ 548407.50 (341,107 86 88) (133a '976-07) (35,897.04) (2501000.46) !i (4101,0,386.62)I ! , (63.19)11 $ (79,789.9A (162.51 &1,410.7`3� (196,074. `4 19 $12' .3 TOTAL *New Construction and Working Capital comparison of budgeted disbursements to actual or This statement I ar budgeted. NOTE those funds 4 � I . ENDING ' BALANCE DISBU REWS ( ) DEFICIT i $1,158,570.78 $392,440.15 255,844.50 (37,603.18) 211,425.50 15,278.03 914,111.87 63,752.26 724,335.65 20,367.36 274,402.03 --- 503,061.67 (9,330.38) 610,256.22 88,690.69 40,593.73 87,0419.28. ' 523,553.82 89,607.58 59,117.40 26,248.50 389,893.40 40,945.03 340,369.13 15,861.27 1 355,467.42 (19,161.52 $6,311,003.12 $834,145.07 I $ 942,481.50 $46,860.36 I ' $ 147,618.25 $ 40,170.63 288;182:12 (15,5,06,40) ' 125,864.93 (31,864.23) 1,0309780.96 (51,434.55) 11.59 7,873.75- 53,189.54 250,960.29 22,790.00 -_ 189,334.38 5,880.36 I i� i 6 n a I a i A I� f 1 i I� i it n v e ri i A XI o I I� o� Room �z I I 'I: 11 li L _ ,ll 1 I ' CITY OF IOWA CITY STATRvTM OF BUDGETED AND ACTUAL DISBURSFN40gS BY FUND ' Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1976 I I 1 ET ACTUAL GENERAL FUND: Administration $ 1,289,936.00 Coummity Development 546,399.00 Public Safety 1,684,605.00 Transportation 1,775,907.00 Environmental Protection 699,415.00 leisure $ Cultural Opportunities 1,070,631.00 Subtotal L7 00 DEBT SERVICE FUND $ 942,909.00 CAPITAL PROJECr FUNDS: Water-Systemstru tion ation $ 926.00 Imp ovements Pollution Control System 421,469.00 Improvements Street'Construction 331,841.00 1066„668.00 , Bridge Construction Parking Facilities Improvements 130,000.00 303,190.00 Landfill Improvements Other Construction 22,790.00 4,199,721.00 Pension and Retirement $ WERPRISE'FUNDS: Parking Revenue Pollution Control Operations $ 389,039.00 727,323.00 Sewer Bond Reserves Water Operations 95,610.00 Water Bond Reserves 1,310,665.00 286, 626., 0,0. TRUST $ AGENCY FUNDIS: Pension and Retirement $ 744,482.00 *SPECIAL ASSESSDM FUNDS $ 57,500.00 r— 1,150 8701-78 467, 27Q!: 00 1,638,447.52 1,428,313":(5 S82,671' , i2Z _1,03_ g 729'95 $ 6,31_ 1 00312- $ 942,481y5.Q $ 147,618.,25 $' ' 288;182.12 125,864.,63 1,030,180,,§ 53,189.54 22, 7900 189,334'. 8. (4} BUDGET VAJ,,gANCE MIR Mi $ $ 388,975.81 647,533.03 95,447.50 1,249, 254.2*' 270,328.0(- (421IN 50) 0, 00q.. (63,414) (79, 789gj7) (162, O) •(61,420.,0 $ 548,4017.56 $ (196,074. 1: im FQ? TOM $18,278 652 00 *New Construction and Working Capital NOTE: This statement is a comparison of budgeted disbursements to actual for those funds which are budgeted. 4 CITY OF IOWA CITY SUMMARY SFATEMENT OF FUND TRANSACTIONS Fiscal Year Ended June 300 1976 GENERAL FUND: Administration Community Development: Planning. Engineering Public Safety: Police Protection Fire Protection Transportation: Traffic Control Mass Transportation Street System Maintenance Airport Environmental Protection: Sanitation Cemetery Leisure $ Cultural Opportunities: Recreation Parks Library SUBTOTAL CAPITAL PROJECT FUNDS: Water System Construction Park 6 Recreation Improv6ments Pollution Control System Improvements Street Construction Bridge Construction Parking Facilities Impro%f6dents Landfill. Improvements Other Construction 5 BEGINNING BALANCE � DEFICIT $ 472,059.21 35,681.98 68,801.59 (13,800.02) 959.39 (78,539.20) (100,892.31) 657,665.84 102,733.62 100,457.20 (37;963..68) 27,545.64 51,504:75 (40,089e88) $1,246,1?4.13 $ 298,521.19 $ 125,320.02 18,263.92 31,153.04 (14,068.87) 7,885.34 330.60 .14 66,365.08 RECEIPTS $1,078,951,72: 182,559,34 99,t, 664. �5 743-,2,4.3:62 352,941.23 5941623.60, 4;,281.0 2l, ,90.9.39 512,704.20 12$,329.$8' 35,292.79 3611,725:65 376 ;3955.78 ,$5,894,0 0, i $ 8�4, 41,1. $0 62,847.66r 994),415,48 30�,819.2� 2,789.86 12Qa849.66. DISBURSEMENTS $1,158,570.78 255,844.50 211,425.50 914,111.87 724,335.65 274,402.03 503,061.67 610,256.22 40,593.73 525,553.82 59,117.40 339,893.40 340,369.13 355,467.42 $6,311,003.12 $ 942,481.50 $ 147,618.25 288,182.12 125;864.93 1,030,780.96 11.59 53,189.54 22,790.00 189,334.38 0 ENDING BALANCE ( DEFICIT $392,440.15 (37,603.18), 15,278..03 63,752.26 20,367.36 (9,330.38) 88,690.69 87,049.28 89,607.58 26,248.50 40,945.03 15,861.27 (h1,161.52 $834:,145,0.7 $ 46,860.36 $ 40,170.65 (15. 5,06.40) 31,AC 23) 51,434.55) 7,873.75' 250:960.29 5,880.36 CITY OF IOWA CITY SUMMARY STATEMENT OF FUND TRANSACTIONS Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1976 ENTERPRISE FUNDS: Parking Revenue Sewer Revenue: Pollution Control Operations Sewer Bond Retirement $ Reserves Water Revenue: Water Operations Water Bond Retirement $ Reserves TRUST AND AGENCY FINDS Pension 6 Retirement General Revenue Sharing Escrow Accounts: nests Library Gifts i Be4 Project Green Monument Escrow Reno Street Park Special Populations Involvement Staff Escrmf Legal Escrow Transit System Replacement Reserve INIWLMER 40iTAL SERVICE FV)S Payroll Equipment Maintenance Division Central Supe Y 8aceiv Clearing Accounts Reimbursable Programs SPECIAL ASSFSSMEPTf FUNDS Paving Sewer Sidewalk Street Lighting New Construction Working Capital 7 $ 11,553,.84 544,366.37 4.,79§.95 34,752.44 1,441.80 93.98 (521.64) 1,,724.31 1251928..75 (191 .5561.55) (4,464.30) 21,157.15 (35, 3,45.99) $(41.3,404.S2) (55,838.49) (45,034.15) 930.23 2,246.22 572,662.37 $ 787,220.71 573,676.84 6,977.18 25,409-87 138.72 4,30$.33 231,987.25 42,313.53 $4,441,741-18 310,132.62 37,938..74 156,547.59 252,124.39 $, 124,785.25 19,886.04 61213.58 371.33 11,486.21 42,200.81 BEGINNING ' BALANCE ( ) b_ BFICIT RECEIPTS _ ---- ' $ 408,326.70 $ 320,493.72 205,968.61 6722893.18 , 204,691,92 3,42,785.00 , 244,039.36 1,290,393.03 482,677,67 319,626.00 7 $ 11,553,.84 544,366.37 4.,79§.95 34,752.44 1,441.80 93.98 (521.64) 1,,724.31 1251928..75 (191 .5561.55) (4,464.30) 21,157.15 (35, 3,45.99) $(41.3,404.S2) (55,838.49) (45,034.15) 930.23 2,246.22 572,662.37 $ 787,220.71 573,676.84 6,977.18 25,409-87 138.72 4,30$.33 231,987.25 42,313.53 $4,441,741-18 310,132.62 37,938..74 156,547.59 252,124.39 $, 124,785.25 19,886.04 61213.58 371.33 11,486.21 42,200.81 DIS_ S $ 388,975.81 647,533.03 95,447.50 1,249,254.27 270,328.00 $ 548,407.50 835,465.89 6,175.52 11,025.42 60.58 5,212.19 231,880.00 $4,441,741.18 405,123.99 39,974.79 132,999.85 274,021.87 $ 39,000.00 9,485.60 13,817.43 5,000.00 N ENDING BALANCE ) DEFICIT $ 339,844.61 2311328.76 252,029.42 285,178.12 531,975.67 $ 250,367.05 282,577.,32 5,598.61 49,136.89 L"J41. 80 93.98 78.14 (1,425.50) 1,831.56 168,242.28 (286,547.92) (6,S00.35) 44,794,89 (57,003.47) $(327,619.27) (35,952.45) (48,306.17) 1,301.56 (85.00) 609,863.18 A CITY OF IOWA CITY gUNMARY SfATENQ NI OF FUND TRANSACTIONS tt 1976 Fiscal Year Ended June 30, BEGINNING BALANCERECIl! ---EIP---TS-'-" d SPCom�mmittyDeveloRpment Block $ _ _ _ $ 889,730.67. !' , Grant Program ' Road Use Tax 901 62 $20 Old TING FUNDS $3' �— — 327 TOTAL OPERA' URBAN REM $ 47q,8. 62 $14,685,057.01 , City-University R'14 24343.44 4 Tax Escrow LOW � HOUSING PROGRAMS $ 46,303.43 $ 362,710.78 5,250:00 Section 23, IA 224 54,259,1q Section 23; IA 22-2 --- Section 8; KC 9033E , INDlMIAL DEVELOPMENT E 2.06 $ 396,95b.26 Bond Fund - Phil'ips petTol(Ao $ ,I Project $ 14,40.14 $ 12,845.00 227,440.56 Police Pension 919,787.86 14,230.00 Police Retirement 6,'126.48 240 735,40 , Fire Pension 962 —�`-- Fire Retirement $6,32 $36,01 51no 'AL ' Payroll Clearing $(4,441,741.18) Disbursements from Payr $ Fund (433;713.54) Disbursements from Intragovexznnenta _-- (420:9) Service Fundstransactions Other Interfund 06'3,67 327,091.1s $27:04 TOTAL 1 I 9 I� ENDING $ 347,588.19 $ BALANCE DISBURSEMENTS (DEFICIT) $ 889,730.67 $ --- 358,597.14 $ 396;956.25 527,574.88 $20,010,514.62 $3,906,813.87 $ $14,957,019.46 $ 198,873.17 --- 9,611.57 243.44 $ 347,588.19 $ 61,426.02 --- 5,250.00 27,391..45 26,867.65 $ 396;956.25 $ 2.07 $ 7,$59.43 $ 20,052.71 84,192.29 1,063,036.13 9,611.57 10,744.91 74,646.18 1,129,086.72 $_35,915,179.44 $6,422,396:69 $(4,441.741.18) $ --- (433,713.54) ---• (4,098,766.59) -- $26,940.958.13 $6,422.396.69 10 IL. CITY OF IOWA CITY SUMMARY OF RECEIPTS Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1976 INPER- GOVBMENTAI, TAXES REVENUE GP3NTM FUND: Administration $ 99,839.94 $ 451,.135'.09 Commmity Development: 158_;3.48.02 -- Planning 114;665.32 --- Engineering Public Safety: Police Protection 883,366.53 --- Fire Protection 560,055.79 --- Transportation: 208.00 141,437.27 Traffic Control 271.25 381,162.Q0 Mass Transportation __- 391.91 Street System Maintenance - --- Airport Environmental Protection: 351,335.95 122,790.00 Sanitation 3:07,,050.67 - - Cemetery Leisure $ Cultural Opportunities: 127,711.36 114,073.00 Recreation 282,586.37 12,153.81, Parks 333,706.88 5,520.17 Library $1,229,663.2S SUBTOTAL$3,019,146.08 DEB SERVICE FUND $ 444,245.67 $ --' CAPITAL PROJECT FUNDS: $ 17„468.86 Water System Construction 223x503.05 Park 6 Recreation Improvements Pollution Control System ___ 621847.6.6 Improvements ___ 949,574.62 Street Construction Bridge Construction -__ Parking Facilities Improvements__ - Landfill Improvements __- 128,849.66 Other Construction 11 RENTS TRANSFERS TOT' -- ' $ 373,232.69 $154,744.00 $1,078,951.7.2. ' 24,211.32 101,950.92 --182,559.3-4- 1,285.70 217,901.9;4 '. 47,5.18.62 60,779.00 991,664.1;5 743,7434?- 183,687.83 --- 17,845.61 193,450.35 352,941:113 594,623.fj0.' ' ' 213,190.35 40,507.93 --- 381.23 41,281.57 2¢,909.59 24,909.39 ' 38,578.25 _ 734.60 51,2,'704.20 123.,329,58 15,544.31 353,292.79. ' 111,508.43 4,985.47 500000 '000.00 304,.725:65, 376,395.17.8 ' 37,168.73 $1,234 839.85 -- $416,374,.88 $5,899,024:06 $ $246,575,.00 $ 69.0,820+67 $ 45,000.00 $ 62,468;86 30,908.75 254:,411:85. _-- 62,847,66- -- 13,840.66 30,000.00 993,41$:28. ' 629.69 303,189.54 303,819'.23 2.2,7891.86:, - 22,789.86 _-- 128,8491.66 12 i( CITY OF IOWA CITY SUWMARY OF RECEIPI'S Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1076 GOVERRMENTAL TAXES kEVENUE ENTERPRISE FUNDS: Parking Revenue $ --- $ --- Sewer Revenue: Pollution Control Operations --- Sewer Bond Retirement $ Reserves --- Water Revenue: Water Operations --- Water Bond Retirement $ Reserves --- --- TRUST AMID AGENCY FUNDS Pension $ Retirement $730,451.74 $ --- General Revenue:Sharing --- 548,323.00 ,I Escrow Accounts: Library Gifts;& Bequests --- --- Project Green; --- Monument Escrow --- Reno Street Park --- Special Populations Involvement --- Staff Escrow --- --- Legal Escrow --- --- Transit System Replacement Reserve ----- INTRAGOVERKfMAL SERVICE FUNDS Payroll $ --- $ --- Equipment Maintenance Division --- --- Central Supply & Printing 142.65 Clearing Accounts --- Reimbursable Programa --- 62,976.73 , SPECIAL ASSEssmr FUNDS Paving $ --- $ --- Sewer --- - - Sidewalk --- --- Street Lighting --- --- New Construction --- 4,482.50 Working Capital --- --- 13 �I OTHER RECEIPTS TRANSFERS i� TOTAL j $ 320,493.72 $ --- !I $ 320,4931.72 I 672,893.18 --- 672,8931,.18 --- 142,785.00 142,785,.00 1,290,393.03 --- 1,290,3931.Q3 --- 319,626.00 i 319,6261.00 $ 56,768.97 $ --- ' i $ 787,220.71 25,353.84 --- 573:§M-44 1 6,977.18 --- 6,977.18 25,409.87 --- 25,409.87 138.72 --- 13y;,72, 4,308.33 --- 4,30&'.53 231,987.25 --- 231,987'.25 4,813.53 37,500.00 4,31.53. $ --- $4,441,741.18 $4,441,74,1&- 310,132.62 --- 310,134.6'2 37,938.74 --- 37,93f.74 156,404.94 --- 15fi,54 ,59 157,288.00 31,859.66 252,12:39. ! $ 124,785.25 $ --- i $ 124,78$.25 19,886.04 --- 19,880.04 6,213.58 --- 6,21 .59, ! 371.33 --- 371.33 7,003,71 11,486x.21 40,330.77 1,870.04 42,200.81 CITY OF IOWA CITY SUWARY OF RECEiIPTS Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1976 I1grr-RGOVERiLZWAL, TAXES REVENUE. SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS Community Dovelopinent Block Grant Program $ --- $ 889730.67 Road Uso Tax --- 886,172.02 TOTAL OPERATING FUNDS $4,193,843.49 $5,002,734.67 URBAN RENEWAL City -University R-14 $ --- $ 791,071.00 Tax Escrow --- --- LOW RENT HOUSING PROGRAMS Section 23; IA 22-1 $ --- $. 242,270.00 Section 23; Lk 22-2 --- 5,250.00 Section 8; KC 9033E --- 54,177.00 INDUSTRIAL DEVEIAMM REVERUE Bond Fund - Phillips Petroleum Project $ --- $ --- Police Pension $ --- $ --- Police Retirement --- --- Fire Pension --- --- Fire Retirement --- --- c.ZWOTAL $4,193,843.49 $6,095,502.67 Disbursements from Payroll Clearing Fund $ --- Disbursements from Intragovernmental Service Funds --- Other Interfund Transactions --- TOTAL $4,193,843.49 (1,248,327.81) $4,847,174.86 OIITU RECEIPTS, $ -- $ 4,742,199.09 $13,893,986.01 $ 120,440.78 82.10 TRANSFFJO TOTAL $ --- $ 62077,223.62 $ 889, 730i.6,� 886,17.02 $20,01 6,000._ 7 $14,685,057;01 $ 362.,710».78 5,250400- 54,259„10- $ 396,956.26 $ --- $ 396,956,,26. $ 12,845.00 227,440.56 $ --- $ 12,845.Oq --- 227,446:156 14,230.00 --- 14,230.00 240,735.40 --- 240.,735„40 $192648,915.20 $ 62077,223.62 $36,015,48498 $ --- $(4,441,741.18) $(4,441,741,18), (433,143.54) (1,215,526.34) (570.00 (1,634,912.44 (433,113„�4) (4.098.,766.,59 $18,000,245.32 $ -07 $27,041,263.67 16 lim CITY OF IOWA CITY SUMMARY OF DISBURSE4ENPS Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1976 SERVICES— PERSQNAL CCMv10 iS M CHARGE�i I �, GENERAL FUND' $ 590,660.21 $ 17,820.:L5 $ 447,437.,:55 ' Administration 24,901bo. Conmimity DeveloFment: 221,951..66 4,626.28 20,661!;,84 Planning 184,557.79 5,549.47 Engineering Public Safety:63,3881;81 787,657.24 58,685.04 20,847:;i44 Police Protection 628,007.34 26,649.87 Fire Protection Transportation: 105,082.27 34,548.55 111,01€i; 37 Traffic Control Mass Transportation 29x,078.63 157,147.98 58,707,76 76,246,79 112,94Li109i 116,63'1','12 ,I Street System Maintenance 2,901.83 10,298,27 16,16374' Airport Environmental Protection: 223,470.36 23,407.87 91,731?,L96 4,9a 0� Sanitation 37,813.52 4,447.73 Cemetery' Leisure $ Cultural Opportunities: 246,095.80 26062.90 , 62, 25Q1.35 57,43.30 , Recreation Parks 199,376.24 250_,5.59_46 29,331.05 9.248'.44 31,51.46 Library $3,926,3tj0_33 $385.6301.17 $1182,07!4.01, SWGIAL $ $ --- $ -- DEBT SERVICE FUND CAPITAL PROD= FUNDS: --- $ 41,419.35 $ 25,2.55.27 Water System,Construction 3fnPravements 3,.018.65 2,435:56 Park $ Recreation Pollution Control System -__ 542.16 53,295.97 9,435. 0 ¢ I Improvements 330.44 8,81,0.98 X1:59 I Street Construction Bridge Construction _-- ___ 646,82 2l��5.96 I Parking Facili$ies Improvements Landfill ImprowwMtsq�549,40 922 St 3.90, Other Construction !I N 17 i ;q t it1 1 1 CAPIT dJTl AYL SERVICE TRANSFERS TOTAL I 1 $ 8,634.49 --- $ 94,018.38 $1,15$�S7U,,7S 4 332.66 ___ ___ �5,m 4';50 1 656.35 Z7T,45.SO 2 1 4,380.78 48,787.00 --- --- --- --- 914",111.,87 724.,335165 23,754.84 --- --- 274,402;..03 834.19 37,500.00 503061,67 1 66,932.02 ___ 1.93,2.92.31 610,256,22 11,223.89 --- --- 40,593.,73. 1 162,152.77 --- 22,789,,86 ;523'553.82 11,868.12 --- --- 5917:1740 1 5,484.35 --- 33Q, 8 3;40 23 321.79 --- 30,908.75 344:3¢9;13 642066.06 --- -- 355,467642 1 $ 436,429,.31 $ -0- _ $378;509.30 $6„311,003612. 1 $ --- $942,481.50 $ -- $ '942,4MSO 1 $ 106,199,90 $ --- --- $ 1471618;25 257,474.64 --- -- 288;182412 1 72,030.80 --- --- 125,8§4.93 1,012,203.94 --- --- --- --- --- 1��030,78Q,:96 I1..59 1 52,246.76 53,189:54 22,790.00 --- ---. 22,793'00 61,891.08 --- 30,000.00 38 1 1 1 CITY OF 10WA CITY SUnAARY OF DISBURSH0WS Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1976 ENTERPRISE FUNDS: Parking Revenue Sewer Revenue: Pollution Control Operations Sewer Bond Retirement $ Reserves Water Revenue: Water Operations Water Bond Retirement $ Reserves TRUST AND AGENCY FUNDS Pension e, Retirement General'Revenue Sharing Escrow Accounts: Library Gifts 8 Bequests Project Green Monument Escrow Reno Street Park Special_ Populations Involvement Staff Escrow Legal Escrow Transit System Replacement Reserve INTRAGOM�ENTAL SERVICE FUNDS Payroll. Equipment Maintenance Division Central Supply G Printing Clearing Accounts Reimbiwsable Programs PERSONAL SERVICES $ 37,588.45 185,111.19 SERVICES 6 COMMODITIES! , Cff1RGES $ 4,567.45: $ 12,936.90 29,355.85 266,313.93 188,661,07- $548,004.60 $ --- - - 606.51 --- 3,126..00.; --- 60.58 --- 5,212.19. 84,3329.88 185,710.21 $ 402.90 360.45 74899.42 231x880.00 $ --- $ --- $ --- 125,442.24 227,611.88 41,186.67 ---23,800.09' 16,174..70 33,202.53 1,826.67. 941247..12 153,343.26 3,672.68; 75,090.60 SPECIAL ASSESS! ENT FUNDS Paving $ --- $ --- Sewer --- "-- Sidewalk --- --- Street Lighting --- "-" New Construction --- --- 575.01 Working Capital --- "-- - r, 1 ' CAPITAL DEBT OITPLAY SERVICE TRANSFERS TOTAL $20,855.47 $ --- $ 313,027.54 $ 388,975:81 8,609.11 --- 340t127.00 647,533.03 95,447.50 --- 95,447.50 94,804.06 --- 513,765.00 1„249;25,4,..27 ' --- 225,328.00 45,000.00 270,328.00 $ --- $ -"- --- $ 348:,.407..50 --- 835 465.89 ,435,465'.89 ' 5,208.56 --- --- 6,175.52 --- 11,025.42 5,212.,19 ' _-- -_- --^ 231,880.00 ' $ 10,883.20 $4,441,741.18 $4,441.,741.§9 405;123.�9 3,153.53 41,915.33 ___ --_ --_ 570,00 39,974.79 132,999.85 ' 214;021:&7 ' $ ___ --- $ 39, ___ $ 39;000.00 ___ 9,485.60 9,485..60 ' 13,242.42 --- --- 13,817.43 5,000.00 --- 5,000.00 20 i CITY OF IOWA CITY SUMARY OF DISBURSH&NFS Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1976 SPECIAL REVENUE FUMS Community Development Block Grant Program Road Use Tax TOTAL OPERATING FUNDS URBAN REMWALR_ 14 City -University Tax Escrow LOW REM HOUSING PRS Section 23; IA 22-1 Section 23; IA 22-2 Section 8; KC 9033E INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT REVENJE Bond Fund - Phillips Petroleua Project Police Pension Police Retirement Fire Pension Fire Retirement SUBTOTAL PERSONAL C"ODITIES SEVICES $ --- $ $ --- $ $5,280,715.62 $ 532;532.41 7,009.49 $ 153.45 $ -- --- $ --- $ 7,259.43 80,833.00 9,611.57 70,628.90 $5>44_ 9,048_52 Disbursements from Payroll Clearing $ --- Funds Disbburrs mentService F from Intrag�7er1°m'ntal (65, ()95.75) 307 345.03 Other Interfund Transactions TOTAL 21 $5,076,607.74__ :$ --r (81,904.08) 2 560.99 $ 855 8 SERVICES CAPITAL DEBT F, CHARGES OUTLAY SERVICE TRANSFERS TOTAL $ ___ $ ___ $ --- $ 889,730.67 $ 889,7501. 67 --- _358,597.14 358,597.14 $2,114,052.16 $2,219,938..11 $ 1,307,257.00 $ 8,156,019.32 $20,O10a514';62 $ 330,216.04 $ 187,310.51 $14,432,483.42 $ --- $14,957,019,46 __ --- _ --- II Y I i $ 347,391.74 $ 43.00 $ -- $ --- $ 347,588.19 --- --- --- 26,192.76 1,198.69 --- --- 27,391.45 c i $ ___ $ --- $ 396,956.25 $ --- $ 396,956.25 'a $ -- $ — $ --- $ --- $ 7,259.43 3 359.29 -- --- —`— 84.,192,29 ' --- --- 9,611.57 4,017.28 — --- --- 74,646.18 ! X $2,825,229.27 $2,408,490.31_ $16J36, 696.67 $ 8,156,019.32 $35,915,179.44 F, $ --- $(4,441,741.18) $(4,44-1,741.18) (284,920.95) (1,220.76) --- (572.00) (433,73.54) (75,141.93) (12.50) --- (3,713,706.14) (4098,766.59) $2 465.166.39 $2,407 257.05 $16,136,696.67 $ —0— $26,940,958.13 2 CITY OF IOU C17Y 34 w W TI TrlatS 9[I EN firms Slam Year Cr,M1 J15w 30, 1976 MIS= EVIM.10TAL t NLTDAAL 1.10 IV.i1TIPS GV'ITAL TP1lST i AWINISTW4TIa1 1M=- ;`la ITL10VA41 m�W �i 1tL3LY I,ISMT LITECTA4 CDV,kL Ittat "=IM AIMINISIPLTIat "' "•" a3f13'IITY DIVELa 9M 103.85 "' ... ' gOG.iC SAPkTY 60,779.00 T3A`siCR7ATla1 539.27 193,197.31 ... •• 303.33944 .._ __. 5.000.00 FTYIICKOYCAL NWleLlltn ]>:.'"' U19. 3 7LL1098L OPPM SS/0 12].00 DMI SWICE ... 22.769.96 30,903.75 30,000.00 -- CAPITAL IPNCLCS ... SD07196MMS ••• _-• .-. _._ __• ••_ __ ... rA]rn wEmals 711111 A AGDO ... . ••• 37,500.041 .•. ... IMR,YAVFA`79MAL •... ... ... ... 31,361i66 ••• ••- swim ._. WICIAL ASSCS903iC5 .• .._ _._ .._ TOTAL DISFERMI7r15 �c_ mn�p_J 591013.33 1230,79LS1 527.769.86 381 906.75 $30.000.00 - ---� -Sam IIIOVVICK: rarklnt rmt• SmJ to 8104 capital projects Fm3a for <mattuct m 73104 Vansfrr rCprarnb Jk 4cvmrn4,o( 1303,169.54 ('oor r al;ktal for tla Cirat DrWn Rc l PartirZ f4dlitY. 9f p,rkint vTlwo ta"wrkint 23 �u i. n 99.Si1.00i �' I 99.85,02 � j I' 319.8fi.00 ,i II $513;735,011 "=IM PA93IM CCtawL WmVE MIPATI(S 9.133.00 Sb :92,00 .._ 116.930.00 303.33944 .-- - 112.731.00 $SIS.n7].54 SS/0 12].00 �u i. n 99.Si1.00i �' I 99.85,02 � j I' 319.8fi.00 ,i II $513;735,011 1 r r r� 1 - r r Y.1T7A fTMiLLL ws•Eub. I.YIRb oh'ES SI4WI.�G 0A73tVT,V7AL SPMAL 0omwrff . ._ SEN1� 7ti;0 ASJI.CVI.YS GNAT IGI WW! USD �''�""��A If R"�"�•--iy,--;�-� TAX RA�9 ... . T9k'-SFERS ono7c gTOM 1 66,087.27 ... .., -• -•• 3 1S1.711.W S 66.CS7.27 3ae1.1i _ i z N.e73.a j ••' ... ._. •_� 1.21S.70 -•• l.ie5,70 •• ZU.133.00 _ •- - 60.779.00 ^• .. _ • - 6D.Ti9.00 "' 122.79C.00 ... . 111,1SI,h 193 .931.58 400,370.37 r ... !311.101,85 •• 126.611.35 --- 73660 123.790.00, ••• _.. 377152660 •-. :7E.61f.3S .7. ...: 15.000.00 261,111.n •- 316.s75.00 _ _ ... 216.S7S,00 119.770.67 21I.IS5.0/ ••• • 431.888.1s 1.363.6!4.98 1.79 :us-zi d ... 318.636.00 r ... ... ... ...� 719.6!6.00' 'I ... ... ... - .._ 37.5C0.00 37.S00,00 . ••• •_• •570.WI 3303.75 - ••_ � 71.159.66 3.00 i , 3I.361.66 a aoo.00 __- sass 1ese9 —�--._ s7_0.O0 1,173.75 _ 1.30a 83 ' �3tDQu^ i Sn•e�95.60 S869.730.67 r IW59)11 i--- Sla9_ 7=2^1 121.295.70 i 1 r 1 24 i ! CITY OF IOWA CITY ! STATBM?r OF TRANSACTIONS BY FUND j GENERAL FUND ! Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1976 i i 1 Fund Balance, Beginning $1,246,124.13 I RECEIPTS 1 Taxes $3,019,146.08 Intergovernmental Revenue 1,228,663.25 Other Receipts 1,234,839.85 ! Transfers In 416,374.88 Total Receipts $5,809,024.0.6 i DISBURSEMENTS 1 Personal Services $3,928,360.33 ;1 Commodities 385,630.17 1 Services and Charges Capital Outlay 1,182,074.01 436,429.31 Transfers Out 378,509.30 1 Total Disbursements $6,311,003.12 ! Fund Balance, Ending $ 834;145.07 i 1 i i 25 '.�I. t GOVEMoff PUBLIC WORKS BUILDINGS TOTAL ' $30,899.46 $13,198.48 $ 533,669.29 104.04 1,256.06 4,770.50 --- 25,702.27 ' 12266.96 657.17 3,902.94 27,385.71 $33,526.52 $18,626.15 $ 590,660.21 ' $ 450.55 $ 14.47 $ 11,999.83 551.63 2.3G 3,765.16 5,579.48 ' 237.05 240,84 $ 12004.54 $ 42016.68 $ 17,820.15 ' $ 787.50 1,685.13 $ 527.95 $ 81,974.15 1,305.90 161.18 --- 50,927.89 119.81 192.69 15,710.49 j 74,256.16 ' 1,265.44 20,079.58 3,968.58 20,079.58 6,830.07 641.27 923.44 27,306.97 ' 163.00 $ 52968.05 8,685.00 _ 133,209.72 37,142.52 34 538.42 $ 447,437.55 1 $' --- $ $ 943.23 8,634.49 $ -0- $ 943.23 $ 8,634.49 ' $ --- $ $ _94,018.38 i ' $40,499.11 $S8,124.48 $1458,570.73 . 30 : CITY OI; IOWA CITY S1''ATF7OC OF TRANSACTIONS BY FUND GENERAL FUND - C"UNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1976 Program Balance, Beginning RECEIPTS Taxes $273,013.34 Intergovernmental Revenue --- Other Receipts 126,162.24 Transfers In _ 1,285.70 Total Receipts Personal Services $406,509.45 Commodities 10,175.75 Services and Charges 45,595.79 Capital Outlay 4,989.01 Transfers Out --- _ Total Disbursements Program Balance, Ending 31 $104,483.57 $400,461.28 $467,270.00 $ 371674.85 CITY OF IOWA CITY STATEMENT OF TRANSACTIONS BY FUND GENERAL FUND - IXX4MITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM - RECEIPTS Fiscal Year Ended .Tune 30, 1976 TAXES Property Taxes Monies $ Credits Subtotal INTERGOv;lTAL REVENUE CITI-)ER RECEIPTS Licenses and Permits Fines $ Forfeitures Charges for Services Use of Money and Property Miscellaneous Subtotal TRANSFERS IN Revenue Bond Transfers Expense Transfers Other Subtotal TOTAL RECEIPTS PLANNING ENGINEERING TOTAL $158,348.02 $114,665.32 $273,013.34 $158,348.02 $114,665.32 $1$273,013.34 $ --- $ --- $ --- $ 12,050.01 $100,500.13 $112,550.14 10,492.34 585.50 11,077.84 1,668.97 865.29 2,534.26. $ 24,211.32 $101,950.92 $1260162.24 $ --- $ $ 1,285.70 1,285.70 $ _0- $ 1,285.70 $ 1,285.70 $182,559.34 $217,901.94 $400,461.28 32 1 C11Y OF IOWA CITY tSTATEMW OF TRANSACTIONS BY FUND ' GENi FLIM) - CCt*9UNITY DE VELOPW DISBURSEMENTS PROGRAM Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1976 33 PLA�WIING ENGZIERIL TOTAL ' PERSONAL SERVICES --'------ Salaries and Wages Part-time and Overtime $201,130.48 $163,683.32 $364,813.801 Pension and Retirement 11,027.56 13,205,61 24,233.1T Employee Insurance 9,793.62 ___ Subtotal ------ $221_951.66 7,668.8 7, 6 17,462.48 —'— -- ' CCOMITIES— $184,_ SS .79 $406,_ 509_4>; Office Supplies Operating Supplies $ 3,529.75 $ 3,029.41 $ 64559,161 ' 989 33 Repair $ Maintenance Supplies 107 20 2 ,334,16 3,323,49 Subtotal ---- $4,626.28 ---185' 90 293.lq;,4 ' SERVICES AND CHARGES $ 5—_549,47 $ 10,175.75 Professional Services Communications $ 7,859.81 $ 3,867.77 $ 11,727,58 ' Transportation F, Education Property $ Liability Insurance 3,663.77 4,875.48 4,187,45 1,1,546.95 7,951 Public Utility Service 541.43 --- 2,549.02 22 3,090.45 ' Repairs $ Maintenance --- --- Technical Services Aid to Other Agencies 1,340,49 4,494.73 2,904.33 1,809.34 4,244.82 Miscellaneous --- 6,304.07 ' Subtotal362..20 $$24_ 468.50 830.70 CAPITAL OUTLAY _ 933,90 $ 20,661_-89 $ 45,— 595,79 Land Structures, Improvements $ $ 250.00 $ --- $ Buildings 250,00 ' Equipment -- --- Subtotal 4_ 082 _ 56 656.35 --- -y TRANSFERS $<<_ -66 $$ 656.35 _ —42739.0.1 $ 42989.01 �_ $ -0- ' TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS $255,844,50 Z $211,425.50 $4672270,00 33 CITY OF IOWA CITY STATEMENT OF TRANSACTIONS BY FUND GENERAL FUND - PUBLIC SAFETY PROGRAM Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1976 Program Balance, Beginning $ (12,840.63) 17rollwN Taxes $1,443,422.32 Intergovernmental Revenue --- Other Receipts 231,206.45 Transfers In 60,779.00 Total Receipts $1,735,407.77 Personal Services $1,415,664.58 Commodities 85,334.91 Services and Charges 84,280.25 Capital Outlay 53,167.78 Transfers Out --- Total Disbursements $1,638,447.52 Program Balance, Ending $ 84,119.62 34 CITY OF IOWA CITY STATEMENT OF TRANSACTIONS BY FUND GENERAL FUND - PUBLIC SAFETY PROGRAM RECEIPTS Fiscal Year Traded June 30, 1976 35 POLICE FIRE PROTECTION PROTECTION TOTAL TAXES Property 'Taxes Monies $ Credits $883,366.53 -- $560,055.79 $1,443,422.32 Subtotal $883,366.53 $5602055.79 $1,443__422.32 INTERGOVEMN NTAL REVENUE $ --- $ OTHER RECEIPTS Licenses and Permits $ 4,342.75 $ """ Fines $ Forfeitures $ 4,342.75 Charges for Services 31,224.73 Use of Money and Property ___ 182,559.70 213;784.43 Miscellaneous 11,951.14 1,128.13 13,079.21 Subtotal— $ 47,518.62 _183,687.83 $ 231_206_45 TRANSFERS IN Revenue Bond Transfers $ ___ $ Expense Transfers ___ --" $ -- Other 60.779.00 --- Subtotal $ 60,779.00 -__ $ -0_ .60,779.00, $ 60,779.00' TOTAL RECEIPTS $991,664.15 $743,743.62 $1,735,4.07.77 35 CT7Y OF IOWA CITY S1AME-W OF TRANSACTIONS BY FOND GENERAI. FOM) - AIMINISTRATION PROGRM Fiscal Year Failed June 30, 1976 Program Balance, Beginning RECEIPTS Taxes Intergovernmental Revenue $ 99,839.94 Other Receipts 451,135.09 Transfers In 373,232.69 Total Receipts 154,744..00 b37.3-ii7� m3 iTy'1.T� Personal Services Commodities $590,660.21 Services and. Charges 17,820.15 Capital Outlay 447,431.55 Transfers Out 6,634.49 Total Disbursements 94018.38 Program Balance, Ending 26 $ .4720059:21 $1,1$82570.78 $ 392 ,440.15 CITY OF IOWA CITY STATEHM' OF TRANSACTIONS BY FUND GENERAL FUND - ADMINISTRATION PROGRAM RECEIPTS Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1976 TAXES Property Taxes Monies $ Credits Subtotal INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 0 ]ER RECEIPTS Licenses and Permits Fines $ Forfeitures Charges •for,. Services Use of Money and Property Miscellaneous Subtotal TRANSFERS IN Revenue Bond Transfers Expense Transfers Other Subtotal TOTAL RECEIPTS Z7 LEGI�� $ -0- $101,087.27 5,022.07 $ 5,022.07 $ -00- $106 109.34 70.98 $7. Q'98 $70,98 FINANCIAL PUBLIC GOVERN'OU AMIINIMATION WORKS BUILDINGS TOTAL $ 71,423.71 $ $ $ 71,423.71 28,416.23 --- 28,416.1 ,23 $ 99,839.94 $ -0- _ $ -0- $ 99,839.94 i$350,047.82 $ 451,135.Q9 $ 692949.47 $ """ $ $69 94947 223,554.82 -"- 223,554.32 52.00 ___ 52.00 73,416.24 ___ 73,416,24 781.30 69.45 316.36 62260.16 ' $367,753.83 $ 69.45. $316.36 $ '373,232.69 $ $ $ $ ,89 136,893.00 17,851.00 ,45 --- 154,744.00 4,7 $1369893.00 $17,851.00 $ -0- $ 154;74.4..00 $954,534.59 $17,920.45 $316.36 $1,078,951:72` 1 i 28 CI'T'Y OF IOWA CITY STATDIENT OF TRANSACTIONS BY FUND GENERAL FUND - ADMINISTRATION PROGRAM DISBURSEaNTS Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1976 COWDITIES $ 3,635.50 $ 4,296.90 $ 3,602.29 02 41. Office Supplies 25955 600.85 Operating Supplies --- i-43 Repair '§ Maintenance Supplies 4,897.75 5 $ 4,006.13 Subtotal -115 $ SERVICES AND CHARGES1,742.88 $ 28,029. 52 $ 186.74 $ 51,442.44 33;225.66 Professional Services 11 4, 3,,597.,09 Comnmmicatidns Transportation & Education FINANCIAL 4,106.81 114.57 73,612.07 Property 6 Liability Insurance Public Utility Service LEGISLATIVE. EXE_ CUTIVE AIMINISfRA !i PERSONAL SERVICES $ 66,355.60 $126,681.15 296,.34.60 $ 13,793.20 133,209.,72 7,219.33 Salaries and Wages Part-time and Overtime 1,760.15 5,274.38 2,646.88 "' $ 19'136.63 Pension. and Retirement 2,;i8.96 5 553, 2U 17,8,89.42 _� --- Employee Insurance $$ 70134,_71 $140,155.61_ $328,217.22 Subtotal COWDITIES $ 3,635.50 $ 4,296.90 $ 3,602.29 02 41. Office Supplies 25955 600.85 Operating Supplies --- i-43 Repair '§ Maintenance Supplies 4,897.75 5 $ 4,006.13 Subtotal -115 $ SERVICES AND CHARGES1,742.88 $ 28,029. 52 $ 186.74 $ 51,442.44 33;225.66 Professional Services 11 4, 3,,597.,09 Comnmmicatidns Transportation & Education 6,,113700.04.69 217 02 4,106.81 114.57 73,612.07 Property 6 Liability Insurance Public Utility Service -21 349.06 -_- 369.97 ,-- .02 87.7 Repairs $ Maintenance 5,213.13 4,270.53 16 v258..60 - Technical Services Aid to Othet Agencies 133,209.,72 7,219.33 '-- 4,345.13 16;730.06 - Miscellaneous 192 051.51 $192'051;. 51 $ 19'136.63 $195,742.94 Subtotal CAPITAL OUTLAY $ --- Land Structures, Improvements $ Buildings 2 442.18_ Equipment $ 2.442.18 Subtotal TRANSFERS $ 33, 237.38 12 27 $ 1,422.27 3_ _ 826.81 $ 3,826.81 $ 60 781.00 $301,760.83 $165.612.26 $592,574.la TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS -- 29 CITY OF IOWA CITY STATEMENT OF TRANSACTIONS BY FUND GENERAL FUND - PUBLIC SAFETY PROGRAM DISBURSEMENTS Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1976 PERSONAL SERVICES Salaries and Wages Part-time and Overtime Pension and Retirement Employee Insurance Subtotal POLICE FIRE PROTECTION PROTECTION $689,403.77 $5942886.34 66,738.44 1,337.85 31,515.03 31,783.15 $787,657.24 $628,007.34 $1,28.4,,290.11 68,,076.29 632298.18 $1 4152664.58 COMMODITIES Office Supplies $ 1,564.19 $ 435.06 $ 1,999.25 Operating Supplies 53,957.66 23,273.50 771,231.16 Repair $ Maintenance Supplies 3,163.19 2,941.31 6404.50 Subtotal $ 58,685.04 $ 26,649.87 $ 85,334.91 SERVICES AND CHARGES Professional Services $ 2,637.30 $ 1,980.75 $ 4p618.65 Communications Transportation $ Education 17,347..01 2,911.74 4,275.01 1,421.01 21;622'.02 4;332.75 Property $ Liability Insurance 1,194.67 1,654.41 3.93 3,529.06 1,198.60 $x183.47 Public Utility Service Repairs $ Maintenance 27,127.34 6,721.66 33x849.00 Technical Services 8,444.81 2,711.64 11,156.45 Aid to Other Agencies --- 2,071.53 --- 248.38 2.,319.91 Miscellaneous Subtotal $ 63,388.81 $ 20,891.44 $ 84,280.25 CAPITAL OUTLAY $ --- $ -- $ �- Land Structures, Improvements $ - - --- Buildings 4,380.78 482787.00 532167.78 Equipment Subtotal $ 4,380.78 $ 48,787.00 $ 53,167.78 TRANSFERS $ --- $ --- $ -- TOTAL DISEURSEMEN S $914,111.87 $7242335.65 $1,638,447.52 36 C[TY OP [O{UA CITY 51'ATEt E -W OF TRANSACTIONS BY FJND GENULU FJND - TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1976 Program Balance, Beginning $ 580,967.95 Taxes $ 479.25 Intergovernmental Revenue 522,991.18 Other Receipts 296,453.28 Transfers In ].93,831.58 Total Receipts $1,013=T5S._29 1�� Personal Services $558,210.71 commodities X79,801.37 Services and Charges 356,764132 102,744.94 capital Outlay Transfers Out 130 792.31 =—z $1,428;;313.65 Total Disbursements Program Balance, Ending $ 1662409.59 37 CITY OF IOWA. CITY STATEMENT OF TRANSACTIONS BY Fuim GENERAL FUND - TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM RECEIPTS Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1976 38 11 TRAFFIC MASS CONTROL TRANSPORTATION TAXES "---- Property Taxes Monies $ Credits $ 208,00 $ Subtotal $_ 208.00 ---=— $ INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE $141,437.27 271.25. $381,162.00 OTHER RECEIPTS Licenses and Permits $ Fines 4 Forfeitures --- Charges for. Services Use of Money and Property 4 >903,88 --�. 212,5,75.70 Miscellaneous 364.41 Subtotal 12,577.32 X65 $..17,845. 61 $B13,Z90'35' TRANSFERS IN Revenue Bond Transfers $ Expense Transfers 158.04 Other 193,292.31 --- Subtotal 19.3 ,450.35 TOTAL RECEIPTS $357.,941.23 $594_ ,62„60 38 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i i 1 1 1 1 STREHP SYSTEM MAINFBMCB $ --- $ 391.91 4,830.00 35,677.93 $40,507.93 $ 381.23 $ 381.23 $41,281.07 AIRPORT $ --- 12,466.00 12 443.39 $24,909.39 $ $ -0- $24,909.39 39 TOTAL $ 479.25 $ 479.25 $ 522,991.18 $ --- 222,3g9.58 12,830.41 61,313.29 $ 296,453.28 $ f 539.27 i 193,292.31 193 ,831.58, $1,013,755.29 CITY OF IOWA CITY STATEMENT OF TRANSACTIONS BY FUND GENERAL FUND - TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM DISBURSEMENTS Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1976 TRAFFIC N1ASS CONTROL. 'TRANSPORTATION PERSONAL SERVICES $ 89,989.84 $200,521.25 Salaries and Wages Part-time and Overtime 10,168..66 80,268.20 Pension dad'Retirement 4,923 77 12,289,18 Employee Insurance $105,082.27 $293,078.63 Subtotal Cavg4UDITIES240.88 $ 610.04 Office Supplies 5,181.15 481,637.15 Operating Supp lies Repair $ Ma;intenance Supplies 28,757.36 9;829.73 $ 34,548.55 $ SBS 7.76 Subtotal SERVICES AND'OiARGES $ 27.00 $ 567.00 Professional Services 960.69 935.87 Cammmications10.55 815.65 4 Transportation f, Education 2,235:56• 4.,236.22 Property $ Liability Insurance 99,368.09 3,794.28 Public Utility Service 4,260,82 81,033.63 Repairs F ldaintenance 3,081.78 8,325.02 Technical Services __- --- Aid to Other Agencies 266.78 13,639.12 Miscellaneous $111.016.37 $112,941.09 Subtotal CAPITAL OUTLAY $ ___ $ --- Land Structures, Improvements -,- Buildings 23,754.84834.19, Equipment $ 23,754.84 $ 834.19 Subtotal $ --- $ 37,500:00 TRANSFERS $274,402. 03 $503,061.6 7 TOTAL DISBURSEME�fTS U11 7� 1 1 1 1 1 STREET 3YSTIM n�t—E $143,799.15 5,200.80 X03 $157,147_98 $ 5.29 28,898.22 a-7 3--, 43.28 76 246.79 $ 3,305.25 815.53 38.00 13,998.05 350.37 71,814.88 4,857.44 245- 7 6� $116,,6_ 3�2 $ 450.69 52,022.45 1--14 458 88 $ 6t93 $193,29 $616_22 Al- RP°- RT 2,901.83 $ 2_901.83 $ --- 5,063.27 5 $10.298 $ 5,878.44 -88.62 2,650.68 3,436.06 1,908.62 1,918.94 -288.38 $16,1(9,74 $ --- 11,223.89 $11,223._89 $ $40,593 41 $ 434,310.24 98,539-49 2-- - ,360.98 $558,210 71 $ 856.21 87,7,79.79 9-a 145-_37 $$ 170,1, 37 $ 9,777.69 2,800.71 1,264.20 23,120.51 106,948:80 159,017,35 18,183.,18 3�-SI 88 $ 3532 $ 450.69 63,246.34 3'--9,047.91 $$ 102 744 $ 230,992 1 $- 65 CITY of rOWA carr S9'ATHEM OF TRANSACTIONS BY FUND GENERAL FUND - ENVIROMENTAL PROTECTION PROGRAM Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1976 Program Balance, Beginning $ 62,493.52 RECEIPTS Taxes $458,386.62 Intergovernmental Revenue 122,790.00 Other Receipts 54,122.56 Transfers In 734.60 Total Receipts $636,033.78 DISBURSEMENTS Personal Services $261,283.88 commodities 27,855.60 Services and Charges 96,720.99 Capital Outlay 174,020.89 Transfers Out 22,789.86 Total Disbursements $582,671.22 Program Balance, Ending $1152856.08 42 CITY OF IOWA CITY STATEMBNT OF TRANSACTIONS BY FUND GENERAL FUND - ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROGRAM RECEIPTS Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1976 43 SANITATION CEMETERY TOTAL TAXES Property Taxes $351,335.95 $107,050.67 $458,386.62. Monies $ Credits --- --- --- Subtotal $351,335.95 $107,050.67 $458„386.62 INTERGOVERWENTAL REVENUE $122,790.00 $ --- $122„790.00 OTHER RECEIPTS Licenses and Permits $ 28.00 $ 6,067.50 $' 6„095.50 Fines f, Forfeitures --- --- Charges for Services 38,047.15 --- 38„047.15 Use of Money and Property --- 2,885.00 2,885.00. Miscellaneous 503.10 6,591.81 7,094.91 Subtotal ;$ 38,578.25 $ 15,544.31 $ 54,122.56. TRANSFERS IN Revenue Bond Transfers $ --- $ --- $ --- Expense Transfers --- 734.60 734.60 Other --- --- Subtotal $ -0- $ 734.60 $ 734.60 TOTAL RECEIPTS $512,704.20 $1232329.58 $6361,033.78 43 r , CITY OF IOWA CITY STATEEXF OF TRANSACTIONS BY FUND GENERAL FUND - ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROGRAM DISBURSEMENTS Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1976 SANITATION _CEMETERY TOIAL PERSONAL SERVICES -- I Salaries and Wages Part-time and Overtime $192,338.21 $34,606,79 $22a'615.(�4 Pension and Retirement 20,104.59 _ 4,711,.x8 Employee Insurance Subtotal 11,027 56 1,_ 929„80 12,957,356 223 .�L470.36 $37,813.,52 _ -- 5261,283;€18 CQNNiODITIES �— Office Supplies Operating Supplies $ 36.21 18 647.34 $ 65..17 $ 101.54 ' Repair $ Maintenance Supplies _ 4,724.,32 1,847.17 2,535.23 20,494..SS 7,259..55 Subtotal $ 23,407.87 $ 4,447.73 - $_27,855.60 SERVICES AND CHARGES Professional Services Communications $ 1,878.06 $ 50.00 $ 1,928,19i6 Transportation $ Education 652.02 410.50 267.x4 127.32 919.31p Property $ Liability Insurance 15„441,60 Public Utility Service 532,92 1,256.92 f 16,697.ti1> Repairs $ Maintenance Technical Services 60,594..08 825'29 931.1:5 1,358...7[ 61,525.1„4 Aid to Other Agencies 5,169.25 1,440.41 q,bpg,60 Miscellaneous 7,054.53 __ 90.50 _ _ 7,145.Q91 Subtotal 91732.96 _$ 4,988.03 _$ 96,720.95)1 CAPITAL OUTLAY - ' Land $ --- $ --- $ Structures, Improvements $ --- Buildings Equipment 41,448.14 4,814.17 46,262.31 _120,704.63 72053.95 127,758.513 Subtotal $162,152.77 $112868.11; $174,020.85? TRANSFERS $ 22,789.86 $- $ 22, 789.86 I TOTAL DISBURSEIENIS $523,553.82$5911740 $582,671.22 1 44 it iI ' SII CITY Of+ IOWA CITY 1'1'ATIM, OF TRANSACTIONS BY FUND GENERAL FUND - LEISURE 0 CULTURAL OPPORTUNITIES PROGRAM Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1976 Program Balance, Beginning $ 38,960.51 RECEIPTS Taxes $744,004.61 Intergovernmental Revenue 131,,746.98 Other Receipts 153,662.63 ' Transfers In 5,000.00 Total Receipts $1,034,414.22 DISBURSBOUS Personal Services $696,031.50 Commodities 64,642.39 Services and Charges 151,275.11 Capital Outlay 92,872.20 Transfers Out 30,908.75 Total Disbursements $1,035,729.95 Program Balance, Ending $ 37,644.78 i 45 CITY OF IOWA CITY STATEMENT OF TRANSACTIONS BY FUND GENERAL FUND - LEISURE $ CULTURAL OPPORTUNITIES PROGRAM RECEIPTS Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1976 46 RECREATION PARKS LIBRARY TOTAL, TAXES Property Taxes $127,711.36 $282,586.37 $333,706.88 $ 744,0041.61 Monies $ Credits --- --- --- ___ Subtotal $127,711.36 $282,586.37 $333,706.88 $ 744,004.61 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE $114,073.00 $ 12,153.81 $ 5,520.17 $ 131,746:9$ CIPHER RECEIPTS Licenses and Permits $ --- $ --- $ --- $ --- Fines $ Forfeitures --- --- 14,159.01 14,159:01 Charges for Services 98,969.15 --- 20,355.90 119,32,5.05 Use of Money $ Property 7,354.70 313.00 --- 1,667'.70 Miscellaneous 5,184.58 4,672.47 2,653.82 12,510.87 Subtotal $111,508.43 $ 4,985.47 $ 37,168,73 $ 153,662,63 TRANSFERS IN Revenue Bond Transfers $ --- $ --- $ --- $ --- Expense Transfers --- 5,000.00 --- 5,001).00 Other --- --- --- Subtotal $ -0- $ 51000.00 $ -0- $ _ 5,000,:00 _r. TOTAL RECEIPTS $353,292.79 $3042725.65 $376,395.,78 SI,034,414,.22 46 ' CITY OF IOWA CITY ' STATEMENT OF TRANSACTIONS BY FUND GENERAL FUND - DISBURSEMENTS LEISURE $ CULTURAL OPPORTUNITIES PROGRAM ' Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1976 RECREATION =— LIBRARY _ $104,244.08 136,164.35 5,687.37 246,095.80 CO�H0DITIES CAPITAL OUTLAY Office Supplies Operating Supplies PERSONAL SERVICES Repair $ Maintenance S applies Salaries and Wages ' Part-time and Overtime SERVICES AND CHARGES Pension and Retirement Professional Services Cammmications Employee Insurance Subtotal RECREATION =— LIBRARY _ $104,244.08 136,164.35 5,687.37 246,095.80 CO�H0DITIES CAPITAL OUTLAY Office Supplies Operating Supplies $ 1,853.93 Repair $ Maintenance S applies 19,062.95 5,146.02 Subtotal — $ 26�c90 SERVICES AND CHARGES Equipment Subtotal Professional Services Cammmications $ 1,101.00 Transportation & Education 4'897.39 Property $ Liability Insurance Public Utility Service 604.51 2,868.69 Repairs $ Maintenance Technical Services 37,857.57 5,730.41 Aid to Other 4,793.22 Miscellaneous 2,400.00 2,40.0.00 — Subtotal 1_ 997.56 $ 622250.35 _ $167,454.22 23,719.25 8,202.77 $199,376_24 $ 417.81 13,373.75 _15_ 53_ 9.49 $ 29 3305 $ 684.35 2,550.19 1,665.38 14,206.04 7,940.91 4,224.75 25,183.35 976.33 $ 57,4_3-1__30 $ --- $178,370.71 63,643.09 — 8,545.66 $250,_ 559.46 $ 2,361.56 6,189.66 6.22: $ 9,248.4. $ 111.00 5,682.88 1,111.43 515.51 9,473.56 2:212.95 94326.50 _ 3=,,159.63 $ 31.593.46 TOTAL $ 45.,0069.01 223,526.69' S2.43S. SO: $ 696 0-' 3I:Sp $ 41,633;30 . 381,626,36 21, 382.,73 $ 6.4,642.39 $ 5, L55 9,347.03 5, 25.00 15,,4V2:03 13,574_76 58,141.06 $ 5,4_ 84.35 $ 23,321.79 77,GD0_1T — $ 64,Q66,06 $ g2_13;T2.20 I $ --- $ 30,908.7S �— $ --- $339181931.40 $339_ ,g93`40 $340 36_ 9.13 $355,467,42J $1,035 74'9,95 -- -,._ 47 CAPITAL OUTLAY Land ' Structures, Improvements 6 Buildings ' Equipment Subtotal ' TRANSFERS TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS $ 622250.35 _ $167,454.22 23,719.25 8,202.77 $199,376_24 $ 417.81 13,373.75 _15_ 53_ 9.49 $ 29 3305 $ 684.35 2,550.19 1,665.38 14,206.04 7,940.91 4,224.75 25,183.35 976.33 $ 57,4_3-1__30 $ --- $178,370.71 63,643.09 — 8,545.66 $250,_ 559.46 $ 2,361.56 6,189.66 6.22: $ 9,248.4. $ 111.00 5,682.88 1,111.43 515.51 9,473.56 2:212.95 94326.50 _ 3=,,159.63 $ 31.593.46 TOTAL $ 45.,0069.01 223,526.69' S2.43S. SO: $ 696 0-' 3I:Sp $ 41,633;30 . 381,626,36 21, 382.,73 $ 6.4,642.39 $ 5, L55 9,347.03 5, 25.00 15,,4V2:03 13,574_76 58,141.06 $ 5,4_ 84.35 $ 23,321.79 77,GD0_1T — $ 64,Q66,06 $ g2_13;T2.20 I $ --- $ 30,908.7S �— $ --- $339181931.40 $339_ ,g93`40 $340 36_ 9.13 $355,467,42J $1,035 74'9,95 -- -,._ 47 CITY OF IOWA CITY STAMOU OF TRANSACTIONS BY FUND DEBT SERVICE FUND Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1976 ' Fund Balance, Beginning $298,521.19 ' i RECEIPTS $444,245.67 Taxes ' Intergovernmental Revenue Other Receipts 246,575.00 ' Transfers In $690,820.67 Total Receipts ' DISBURSYNEWS $ ' personal Services Commodities --- Services and Charges 942,481.50 Capital Outlay --- Transfers Out $9422481.50 Total Disbursements ' $ 463860.36 Fund Balance, Ending II II I I i� ' 48 M W I= M CITY OF IOWA CITY STATB04r OF TRANSACTIONS BY FUND DEBT SERVICE FUND Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1976 49 RECEIPTS _ AISBUPS134WNIW�_ _— PROPERTY TAX TRANSFER IN TOTAL PRINCIPAL INMEST ---T-=— Park Bonds $ 96,435.96 $ --- $ 96,435.96 $150,000.00 $ 8,2501.00 $15G,250.00 Bridge Bonds 120,021.85 --- 120,021.85 149,000.00 47,9541.00 196,954.00 Street Bonds 216,715.92 --- 216,715.92 275,000.00 80,62-2.50 3515,627.50 Library Bonds 11,071.94 --- 11,071.94 15,000.00 3,16E1.7? 78,168.75 Sewer System Bonds --- 146,950.00 146,950.00 100,0,00.00 30,55(1.00= 1310,550.00 Water System Bonds --- 99,625.00 99,625.00 50,800.00 32,9;M.2S EI2,9r 31.25 TOTAL $444,245.67 $246,575.00 $690,820..67 $739,000.00 $203,4871.50= :59�2,4�81.3q 49 CITY OF I01VA CITY STATEMENTS OF TRANSACTIONS BY FUND CAPITAL PROJECTS PUNDS Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1976 Fund Balance, Beginning ( ) Deficit RECEIPTS: Intergovernmental Revenue: STATE Road Use Tax Grants Other FEDERAL General Revenue Sharing Comm. Develop. Block Grant Grants Use of Money $ ;Property Miscellaneous Transfers In TOTAL RECEIPTS DISBURSBIENTS: Personal Services Commodities Services & Charges Capital Outlay Transfers Out TOTAL DISBURSBMS Fund Balance, Ending ( ) Deficit PARKS $ POLLUTIGN COMPL WATER SYSTEM RECREATION SYSTw CONSTRUCTION IIMPRQ EvMS MMMMS . $125,320.02 $ 18,263.92 $ 3.1,153.04, 7,519.43 9,949.43 45,000.00 $ 62,468.86 1,506.40 169,859.60 45,593.4§ 6,543.50 30,908.75 $254,411.80 545.21 62,302.45 $ 62,847.0 $ --- $ 3,018.65 $ --- 41,418.155 2,433.56 542.16 --- 25,255.27 53,291.97 106,199.90 257,474.64, 72,030.80 $1474618..2.5 $288,182.12: $125,864.93 $ 40,170.63 $(15,506.402 $(31,864.23) 50 III STREET CONSTRUCTION $ (14,068.87) $ 212,855.04 2,239.45 11,972.33 722,507.80 13,840.66 30,000.00 $ 993,415.28 PARKING BRIDGE FACILITIES LANDFILL OTHER CONSTRUCTION IMPR(h+E MTS NPROVEMFNPS CONSTRUCTION TQT�Ii, $71885.34 $ 330.60 $ .14 $ 662365.08 $ 235,249.27 f $ --- $ --- $ --- $ --- --- --- -" 192_88, -'- 79, 279f_25 ___ --- --- 49,377.53 -'- 629.69 --- ___ '-- 303,189.54 22,789.86 _0- 303 819.23 $ 22,789.86 $128.2849..66�- $ 330.44 $ --- $ ___ $ $ 8,810.98 --- 646.82 --- 9,435.60 11.59 285.96 -- 4,549, 1,012,203.94 --- 52,246.76 22,790.00 61,891.08• --- -'- 30,000.00 $11030,780.96 $ 11.59 $ 53,189.54 $ 22,790.00 $189,334.38 $ (51,434.55) $72873.75 $250,960..29 $ -0- $ 5,880.36 $ 212,8$44 12, 004.37 261,17].27 sas,7,;S - si 6, 541.50 62.69 13,840.66 $1;828,602.35 1. $' 3,349609 58,401,.2,1 181,1841,1 2-Y 1, 584, 83;Lj 12 30,000.;00, $1,857,7711,77 $..206,079.:85 CITY OF IOWA CITY STATBUNTS OF TRANSACTIONS BY FUND CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS DISBURSRMUWS Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1976 PARKS & POLLUTION WATER SYSTEM RECREATION COI�EROL. SYSTIlr�i CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS IMFR(NH NTS;�i PERSONAL SERVICES Salaries $ Wages $ ___ $ -__ Structures, Improvements $ Part-time $ Overtime --- Buildings 3,018.65 161,335.46 --- Pension $ Retirement --_ Insurance ___ TRANSFERS $ -_ $ --- $ -- Subtotal $ 70- $ 3,018.65 $ -07 C(X,MDITIES Office Supplies $ --- $ 37-08 Operating Supplies 1,534.51 413.17 Repair $ Maintenance Supplies 41,418.35 861..97 .128,35 - Subtotal $41,418.35 $ 2,433.56 $ 542.16 SERVICES $ CHARGES Professional Services $ --- $ 13,174.65 $ 53;194'.25 Communications --- 80.-62 'ZL84 Transportation $ Education --- -__ Property 6 Liability Insurance --- __- Public Utility Service --- ___ --- Repairs F Maintenance --- ___ 78.00 Technical Services -__ Aid to Other Agencies --- ___ Miscellaneous. --- — 12,,000.00 __- `(,88 Subtotal $ -0- $ 25,255.27 $ 53„291.92 Land $ --- $ 96,139.18 $ -- Structures, Improvements $ Buildings 90,337.07 161,335.46 72,030.80 Equipment 15,86Zv83 Subtotal $106,199.90 $257,474.64 $ 12,1130.80 TRANSFERS $ -_ $ --- $ -- TOTAL DISBURSEEM'S $147,618.25 $288,182.12 $125,864.93 52 STREET CON- CION BRIDGE STIUCTION CON- FACCILITiIES LANDFILL GIM IMPROVEPUMS In _ ONIMTVTS CON_ Sf CTION TO] I — $ --- 330,44 $ --- --- $ --- $ - -- $ --- $ --- --- 3,349.09 330.44 $ -0- $ -0- $ -0- $ - 3,349-09 $ 31.47 $ ---__ $ $ ---$ 519.60 --- _ -- $ 6{},5s 8,259 91 --- 646.82 __- --- 2,4f�{(.88 $ 8,810.98 $ _0_ 646.82 ------0-_L — 4.5491.40 4,549.40 _ 55,861.84 S8.4 13.1.27 $ 7,984.33 314.43 $ --- $ 195.30 $ --- $ 92,748.26 11.59 100.66 ___ $ 167,290!.79 --- --- --- 26.88 546.02 1,061.93 __- -__ --- 11.,76 - 11.:76 _ -- --- 32,,00 1,17.i' 9 --- ___ '-' 75.00 ------4.81 - _-_ --- --- _ 9,435.60 11.59 $ 295.96 --- $ -0- ----=— 12,082:,79 _ _ $_ 92,893..90 $ 181,1841.129 $ 300.00 $ -__ $ -__ $ --- $ --- $ 119,229.18 1,004,298.39 _ 7,605.55 --- --- 45,614.34 6,632.42 22,790.00 24,286,;?2. 1,397,902,.;k8 $1,012_,203,94 $ -0- $522246.76 _--- $22.,790.00 37,604.76 $ 61,891.08 67,705. -{66— $1,584,837JZ $ --- �— $ -- $ - $ - $ 30200.00 $ 30,000.,!10 $1,030 780 96 �—_ $11.59 $53,189.54 $22,790.00 $189,334.39 $1,857,771 _ 717 53 CITY OF IOWA CITY STAT14EMrS OF TRANSACTIONS BY FUND E)VTERPRISE FUNDS Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1976 Fund Balance, Beginning RECEIPTS Taxes Intergovernmental Revenue Other Receipts Transfers In Total Receipts DISBURSI3AW,S Personal Services Commodities Services and Charges Capital Outlay Transfers out Total Disbursements Fund Balance, Ending 54 $1,545,704.26 $ --- 2,283,779.93 462,411.00 $2,746,190.93 $ 489,013.57 222,584.37 282,976.99 445,044.14 112.11 919 54 $2,65_ 1 538 61 51,640_ _356 ----- ' CITY OF IOWA CITY STATEMENTS OF TRANSACTIONS BY FUND ' PARKING REVENUE FUND Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1976 Fund Balance, Beginning $408,326.70 RECEIPTS ' Use of Money $ Property: Rental of Buildings $ 3,900.00 On -Street Parking 131,266.81 Off -Street Parking 143,026.36 Meter Hoods 1,498.00 Parking Permits 21,084.01 ' Interest on Securities 18,573.78 Miscellaneous Revenue 1,144.76 Transfers In --- TOTAL RECEIPTS $320,493.72 DISBURSEMENTS Personal Services $ 37,588.45 Commodities 4,567.45 Services 6 Charges 12,936.90 Capital Outlay 20,855.47 ' Transfers Out 313,027.54 TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS $388,975.81 i ' Fund Balance, Ending $339,844.61 i 55 i. �, iCITY OF IOWA CITY i STATEMENTS OF TRANSACTIONS BY FUND PARKING REVENUE FUND DISBURSEMENTS iFiscal Year Ended June 30, 1976 I i PERSONAL SERVICES Salaries and Wages $ 32,611.92 i Part-time and Overtime 754.95 Pension and Retirement 3,135.44 Employee Insurance 1,086.14 i Subtotal $ 37,588.45 Ca41ODITIES i Office Supplies $ 80.70 Operating Supplies 1,077.32 i Repair P, Maintenance Supplies $ 3,409.43 4,567.45 Subtotal SERVICES AND CHARGES i Professional Services $ 2,200.00 Communications 789.30 Transportation $ Education 244.35 i Property $ Liability Insurance 1,140.68 Public Utility Service 2,421.00 Repairs $ Maintenance 2,122.26 i Technical Services 662.47 Aid to Other Agencies Miscellaneous 3,356.84 iSubtotal $ 12,936.90 CAPITAL OUTLAY i Lana $ --- Structures, Improvements G Buildings 17,065.47 i Equipment 3,790.00 Subtotal $ 20,855.47 iTRANSFERS $313,027.54 iTOTAL DISBURSEM3?rS 'i $388,975.81 I' 56 CITY OF IOWA CITY STATEMENTS OF TRANSACTIONS BY FUND SEWER REVENUE FUNDS Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1976 Fund Balance, Beginning RECEIPTS Charges .for Services: Sewer Rental Certified Sewer Rentals Cleaning Sewers Sewer Connections Intergovernmental Revenue Use of Money § Property - Interest Miscellaneous Revenue Transf6rs In TOTAL RECEIPTS DISBURSEMENTS Personal Services Commodities Services $ Charges Capital Outlay Debt Service Transfers,Oat TOTAL DISBURSEMENI'S Fund Balance, Ending POLLUTION CONTROL OPERATIONS $205,968.61 $649,001.84 621.68 690.08 17,543.33 5,036.25 $672,893.18 $185,111.19 29,355.85 84,329.88 8,609:11 340,127.00 $647,533.03 $2312328.76 57 SEWER BOND RETIREIVEq $ RESERVES $:204,691.92 $ 142,785.00 $142,785.00 95,4.47.50 $ 95,447.50 $252_t029.42 TOTAL $410,660.53 $649A01,84 621..68 690.09 17,;5,43.33 5,036.25 142;785:00 $615,678.18 $185x111.19 29355,85 ,84,329;88 $„609,ll SO ,.34o','127..00 $.742;980;53 $,483,358.18 CITY OF IOWA CITY mvvr ars OF '1RANSACTIONs BY FUND SEWER REVENUE FUNDS - POLLUTION CONTROL OPERATIONS DISBURSEMENTS Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1976 PLAbil' AUGNISTRATION OPERATIONS PERSONAL SERVICES Salaries and Wages $ 27,146.78 77,755.50 Part-time and Overtime 525.13 2,387.69 11,46609 8,,486 Pension and Retirement 1,190.38 4865;:13 4,865':76 Employee Insurance $ 31,249.98 _ ,�1O2y573,48 Subtotal C04SMITIES $ 37.06 25,8'.93 Office Supplies 462.60 1x,447,.12 Operating Supplies Repair 6 Maintenance Supplies --- 5,639.12 $ 499.66 $ 18,345, 1 Subtotal SERVICES AND CHARGES Professional Services $ 1,500.00 5n.U0 1,959.07 ,959.07 1,406.¢4 Transportation 6 Education 538.11 8.46'42 an Property $ Liability Insurance 525.31 2,14.6.51 Public Utility Service 215.35 25,,Zq.28 Repairs 6 Maintenance 649.69 5,575.42, Technical Services 479.14--- Aid 79.14Aid to Other Agencies 18,784.23 189.36 Miscellaneous $ 24,650.89 $ 41,452,22 Subtotal CAPITAL CUTLAY Land $ --- $ --- Structures, Improvements $ 4,269,14 Buildings --- Equipment --- 2,042.35 Subtotal $ -0- $ 6,3.11.49 TRANSFERS $340,127.00 $ --- TOTAL DISBURSH4INTS $396,527.53 $168,682.36 58 0 SENER LIFE SPATION ' SYSfEM MAINTENANCE CONSfBJJCTI:ON TOTAL $40,426.00 $ --- $ --- $145,328.28 ' 3,971.04 15,962.26 4,224.19 --- --- 15,098.01 ' 2,666.50 --- --- $ _0_ 8,722.64 $185,111.19 $51,287.73 $ -0- ' $ --- $ --- $ $ 295.99 3,073.27 1,814.85 --- 17,797.84 4,231.54 1,391.36 --- 11,262,02 ' $ 7,304.81 $ 3,206.21 $ -0- $ 29,355.85 $ $ --- $ --- $ 1,559..00 --- 3,455.71, --- ___ --- 1,344.52 1,033.44 --- --- 3,705.26 10,250.85 36,167.48 2,150.53 2,745.42 --- 11,121.06 ' 1,021.55 --- --- 6,978.28 21.00 .78 1,003.20 19,998 57 t$ 42226.52 $12,997.05 $12003.20 $ 84,329,88, $ --- $ --- $ --- $ --- --- --- 1,327.62 5,596.76 --- 970.00 --- 3,012„35 ' $ -0- $ 970.00 _ _ $1.,327.62 $ 8,609.,11 $ --- $ --- $ --- $340,127.,00 ' $62,819.06 $17,173.26 $2,:330.82 $647,533„03. 59 i 41 CITY OF IO}VA CITY ' STATEMENTS OF TRANSACTIONS BY FUND ' SEWER REVENUE FUNDS SEWER BOND RETIREMENT f, RESERVES Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1976 ' SEWER BOND SEWER BCND SEWER RENEWAL ti INTEREST & INIE ST ' $ IMPROVEMENT* RESERVE** S.UDMIG# Fund Balance, Beginning $16,400.00 $121,000.00 $67,291.92, i ' RECEIPTS Transfers In $362000.00## $ 53,987.00 $52,798.00 TOTAL RECEIPTS $36,000.00 $ 53,987.00 $52,798.00 ' DISBURSEMENTS Miscellaneous $ --- $ --- $ --" ' Debt Service: - --- Ban� 45,000.0© Interest --- --- 56,447.50 ' Transfers Out --- --- -"- TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS $ -0- $ -0- $95,447.50 ' Fund Balance, Ending $52,400.00 $1742987.00 $242642.42 *This fund is So be used to pay any extraordinary cost of maintaining the, works ' and facilities in an efficient operating condition and to pay the'cost of constructing additional works and facilities or improvements or extensions. The fund may pay the principal and interest on the sewer revenue bonds and any future bonds issued ranking on, a parity therewith,whenever sufficient ' funds are not available in the Sewer Bond and Interest Sinking Fund. **Phis fund is restricted to the payments of principal and interest on the ' sewer revenue bonds and any future bonds issued ranking on a parity therewith, whenever for any reason the funds on deposit in the Sewer Bond anis Interest Sinking Fund are insufficient to pay such principal and interest when due: and ' to the call and redemption of bonds subject to redemption prior to maturity. #This fund is restricted to the payment of principal and interest on the sewer revenue bonds and any future bonds issued ranking on a parity therewith. ##Includes transfer in the amount of $12,000 to the Sewer Revenue and Improve- ment Fund for the prior six month period ended June 30, 1975 as required by audit. Required transfers of $25,510.08 to the Sewer Bond $ Interest Sinking Fund to adjust the Fund's balance according to requirements of the Sewer Bond Ordinance ' were made after the close of the fiscal year ended June 30„ 1976. 1 60 CITY OF IOWA CITY STATEMENTS OF TRANSACTIONS BY FUND WATER REVENUE FUNDS Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1976 Fund Balance, Beginning RECEIPTS Charges for Senrices: Metered Water Sales Bulk water Sales Hydrant Rental Contributions for Main Extensions Services 4 Taps Connections Other Use of Money $ Property: trnterest Other Miscellaneous: Sales Tax Other Transfers In TOTAL RECEIPTS DISBURSEMENTS Personal Services Corrmiodities Services $ Charges Capital Outlay Debt Service Transfers Out TOTAL DISKMESUNTS Fund Balance, Ending WATER OPERATIONS $ 244,039.36 $1,066,700.16 1,039.13 7,151.14 100,216.51 15,991.28 15,039.64 33,964.03 28,915.26 21,375.88 $12290,393.03 $ 266,313.93 188,661.07 185,710.21 94,804.06 513,765.00 $1,249,254.27 $ 285,178.12 WATER BOND RFTIR134ENP 6 RESh'RVFS :482 677.67 3197 626.00 $319,626.00 225,328.00 45,000.00 $270,328.00 $531,975.67 TOTAL $1,066,700.16 1,039:13 7,151.14 100,216.51 15,991.28 15�Q39.44 $3;964.03 28,915.26 21,375.88 3119, 626.60 $1LCi1O 0�, 13:03 $ n66,313..93. 7;88;, 661..67 HS, 7lMl '94,804,06 225,328.00 $58,765.00 $1,519,582.'27 $ 817,153.79 *Includes interest earned on securities held by Water Reserve Funds:, 61 i I CITY OF IOWA CITY SfArimiN75 Or. TRANSACTIONS BY FUND WATER REVENUE FUNDS - WATER OPERATIONS DISBURSEMEPITS fiscal Year Ended Jame 30, 1976 PLANT ADMINISTRATION OPERATIONS PERSONAL SERVICES Salaries and Wages $ 29,430.00 $'63,,358.1 Part-time and Overtime 741.79 5,559,38 Pension and Retirement 2,439.84 6a822:75 Employee Insurance 1,545.92 3;817.91 Subtotal $ 340157.55 C(I,A70DITIES Office Supplies $ 101.48 $ 3S: a1 Operating Supplies 622.24 45,&,284.30 Repair F Maintenance Supplies 5.90 7,373.32 Subtotal $ 729.62 $ 75,692!63 SERVICES AND CHARGES Professional Services $ --- $ - Commmications 564.58 2,082.09 Trarisportatioh $ Education 674.27 576,, 9 Property $ Liability Insurance 688.34 2,332,26 Public Utility Service --- $7>$3744 Repairs $ Maintenance 137.72 Technical Services 376.94 4,523.53: Aid to Other Agencies --- Miscellaneous 33,785.63 _ 1'10,44 Subtotal $ 36,227.48 $1041272.17 CAPITAL OUTLAY Land $ --- $ "-- Structures, Improvements F, Buildings --- Equipment 7;458aS3 ""- Subtotal $ -0- $ 7,458.53 TRANSFERS $513,,765.00 $ TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS $584,879.65 $2662982.23 62 1 i i i DISTRIBUTION CUSTQR iSYSTfm SERVICE TOTAL $ 49,538.80 $ 65,930.77 $ 208,258.48 i10,719.71 6,958.02 23,978.90 5,524.01 7,072.SS 21,859.15 2,465.81 4,387.76 121217.40 i$ 68,248.33 $ 84,349.10 $ 266,313.93 i $ 74.11 $ --- $ 210.60 5,087.00 6,767.97 80„761.51 90,351.75 92957.99 _ 107„688.96 i$ 95,512.86 $ 16,725.96 $ 1882661.07 ' $ 27.00 $$ 27.00 20.07 --- 2,.667.64 48.46 --- 1,299.02 1,772.32 2,187.54 6,980.46 i 17,617.76 105,445.00 13,836.71 2,283.15 23,076.95 i1,128.22 2,647.30 8,675.99 3,315.52 326.56 37,538.15 i$ 37,766.06 $ 7,444.55 $ 185,,710.21 1 $ --- $ --- $ --- i4,831.00 $ 4,831.00 $ 82,514.53 82,514.53 $ 94,804.06 94,804.06 i$ --- $ --- $ 513,765.00 $191,034.14 $1,249,254.27 i$206,358.25 63 III I J J F H CITY OF IOWA CITY STATEMENTS OF TRANSACTIONS BY FUND WATER REVENUE FUNDS - WATER BOND RETI1Il4ENT & RESERVES Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1976 Fund Balance, Beginning RECEIPTS Transfers In TOTAL RECEIPTS WATER DEPRECIATION EXTENSION AND DVROVEh1E ft $72,000.00 $54,000.00+ $54,000.00 WATER OPERATION & MAINTENANCE RESERVE** $50,000.00 WATER BOND $ INTEREST RESERVE# $x44,294.33 $146,384.00 $1.46,384.00 WATE4 IBOND'I & IN]ji�2EST!, SPq 442.0Oi . $110,241.001 DISBURSEMENTS Debt Service: Bonds $ --- $ --- $ Interest --- --- --- 15,32&00' Transfers Transfers Out 45,000.00 --- --- -- TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS $45,000.00 $ -0- $ -0- $22 L,32&00 Fund Balance, Ending $81,000.00 $50,000.00 $390,678.337,34 *This fund is restricted to pay the cost of making necessary improvements.arid� extensions to the water plant and system and to pay the principal and intertest, on the water revenue bonds, and any future bonds issued ranking on a parity ' therewith, whenever funds are not available in the Water Bond and Interest Sinking Fund. H L_J **This fund is restricted to the payment of necessary operating and maintenance expenses when no other funds are available and to the payment of principal d'nd interest on the water reve_lae bonds, and any future bonds issued r#nking,on a parity therewith, whenever funds are not available in the Water Bond and Interest Sinking Fund or the Water Bond and Interest Reserve Fund. #This fund is restricted to the payment of principal and interest on the water revenue bonds, and any future bonds issued ranking on a parity there- with, whenever for any reason thee funds on deposit in the Water Boad and Interest Sinking Fund are insufficient to pay such principal and interest when due and to call and redeem bonds subject to redemption prior -�o maturity. ##This fund is restricted to the payment of principal and interestcan the wager revenue bonds and any future bonds issued ranking on a parity therewith. +Includes transfer in the amount of $18,000 to the Water Depreciation; Extension, and Improvement Fund for the prior six month period ended June 30, 1975 as required by audit. Required transfers of $78,006.66 to the Water Bond 4 Interest Sinking Fund to adjust the Fund's balance according to requirements of tie Water,, Bond Ordinances were made after the close of the fiscal year ended June 30, 197£:.. 64 1 CITY OF IOWA CITY STATRyoffS OF TRANSACTIONS BY FUND TBUSf $ AGENCY FUNDS Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1976 Fund Balance, Beginning $ 724,136.80 i RECEIPTS ' Taxes $730,451.74 Intergovernmental Revenue 548,323.00 Other Receipts 355,757.69 ' Transfers In 37,500.00 Total Receipts $1,672,032.43 I DISBURSNEM'S ' Personal Services $548004.60 Commodities 9,005.28 Services and Charges 240,542.77 Capital Outlay 5,208.56 Transfers Out 835,465.89 Total Disbursements $1,638,227.10 Fund Balance, Ending $ 757,942.13 i it 'i I I I it L I� 65 4 CITY OF IOWA CITY STATFTIENTS OF TRANSACTIONS BY FUND TRUST F AGENCY FUNDS - PENSION F RIII'IREMENp FUND Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1976 Fund Balance, Beginning RECEIPTS Taxes Other Receipts: $730,451.74 Charges for Services Miscellaneous Revenue 56,085.22 TOTAL RECEIPTS68– 3.75 DISBURSEMENTS Personal Services: F.I.C.A. Tax Iowa Public Employees $150,420.88 Retirement System Police Pension Fund 90,238.69 Police Retirement 12,525.00 Fire Pension Fund Fire Retirement 156,703.65 13,950.00 Fund Miscellaneous 144,166.38 TOTAL DISBURSIENIS— 4– 02.90 Fund Balance, Ending M $ 11,553.84 $787,220.71 $548„4_ 07,50 $250,367.05 n 1 1 CITY OF IOWA CITY STATEMENTS OF TRANSACTIONS BY FUND TRUST & AGENCY 1 GENERAL RM0,MEiUNDS SHARING FUND Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1976 1 1 $544,366.37 1 Fund Balance, Beginning 1 RECEIPTS $548,323.00 Intergovernmental Revenue 25,353.84 1 Use of Money $ Property -Interest $573,676.84 TOTAL RECEIPTS 1 DISBURSHAENTS $ Personal Services --- Commodities Services $ Charges __ 1 Capital Outlay 835 465.89 Transfers Out $835,465.89 1 TOTAL DISBURSBiENTS Fund Balance, Ending $282.L577.32 ---- 1 1 1 67 i CITY OF IOWA CITY STATEMENTS OF TRANSACTIONS BY FUND TRUST $ AGENCY FUNDS - GENERAL REVENUE SIiARING FUND DISBURSEMENTS Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1976 A7NINISTRATION Social Services $ 62,258.87 Central Equipment Facility Study 25,500.00 Government Space Needs Study 3 828.40 CM NITY DEVELOPMENT Ralston Creek Study $ 11,482.27 River Corridor Study 20 000.00 TRANSPORTATION Mass Transportation $258,833.00 Bikeways 11,972.33 ENVIROPMENTAL PROTECTION Sanitary Landfill Operations $122,790'.00 LEISURE $ CULTURAL OPPORTUNITIES Special Populations Involvement Program $ 9,073.00 Recreation Operations 100,000..00 Recreation Center Roof Repair 66,990;9S Library Operations 5,454.85 Library Roof Repair 22,296.98 Neighborhood Park Improvements 8,369:31 Park Road Construction 43,890.91 Englert Tract - Park Purchase 16,7,39.18 Mercer Park Tennis Courts 19,569.34 East Side Park Public Tree Trimming Project 15,000.00 _12,116.50 TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS M $ 91,587..27 $ 31,.48 2.27 $270,805,33 $122,790,00 $318,801.02 $8352465.89 CITY OF IOWA CITY STATEMENTS 01: TRANSACTIONS 13Y FUND TRUST $ AGENCY FUNDS ESCROW FUNDS Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1976 Fund Balance, Beginning ( ) Deficit RECEIPTS Charges for Services Use of Money & Property Miscellaneous Revenue: Deposits Contributions Other Transfers In TOTAL RECEIPTS DISBURSEMENTS Commodities: Office Supplies Operating Supplies Repair $ Maintenance Supplies Services 4 Charges: Professional Services Communications Transportation f, Education Property f Liability Insurance Public Utility Service Repairs & Maintenance Technical Services Aid to Other Agencies Miscellaneous Capital Outlay Structures, Improvements, fi Buildings Equipment Library Materials TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS Fund Balance, Ending ( ) Deficit LIBRARY GIFTS F, BSE UESTS $4,796.95 6,977.18 $6,977.18 $ 56.70 549.81 32.67 PROJECT GREEN $34,752.4;4 $ --- 1,613.40 12,000.39 11,796.18 $25,409:87 $ 37.11 3,050.09 38.80 133.54 392.,52 MON MI EN' ESCR014 $1,441.81} $ -0- 62.00 --- 39.68 5,000.00 - 285.80 1,341.69 --- --2.30 969.67 --- 2,320.f9 --- --- 2,887.87 - --- $6,175.52 $11,025.42 $ -0- $5,598.61 $491136.84 X1;441.80. 69 SPECIAL POPULATIONS RENO INVOLVEMENT STAFF LEGAL SARK TRUST FUND ESCROIV ESCROW 93 98 0 521.64 $-.1,724.3 --- 138.72 --- 231,880.00 41308.33 107.25 $ -0- $138.72 42388.33 $231,9gy 60.58 5,212.19 --- --- --- 231,880.00 60.58 $ 5,212.1! -- $231,880.00 $93.98 $ 78.14 lags. 50 -- _� $11831.56 70 ' CITY OF IOWA CITY STATEMENTS OF TRANSACTIONS BY FUND e TRUST & AGENCY FUNDS TRANSIT REPLACEMENT RESERVE FUND ' Fiscal Year Ended JLme 30, 1976 ' Fund Balance, Beginning $125,928..7.5 ' RECEIPTS Use of Money F, Property - Interest $ 4,813.53 Transfers In 37,500.00 ' TOTAL RECEIPTS $ 42,1313.53 DISBURSMNTS $ Fund Balance, Ending $168,242.28 ' 71 � II 01 CITY OF IOWA CITY STATEN9WFS OF 1REWSACTIONS BY FUND INTRAGOVERNDMAL SERVICE FUNDS Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1976 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE CENTRAL SUPPLY1. PAYROLL DIVISION $ PRINTING Fund Balance, Beginning $ --- $(191,556.55) $(4,464.30) ( ) Deficit RECEIPTS $ --- $ --- $ Charges for Services Intergovernmental Revenue --- --- Deposits --- --- --- Reimbursement of Expenses --- 309,838.08 36,201.69 Other Receipts --- 294.54 1,73.7.05 Transfers In 4,441,741.18 I --- TOTAL RECEIPTS $4,441,741.18 $ 310,132.62, $37,938.74 DISBURSEMENTS Personal Services $ --- $ 125,442.24 $i ->- Coimnodities --- 227,611.88 2,3,800.051 Services $ Charges --- 41,186.67 16,174.76 Capital Outlay --- 10,883.20 --- Transfers Out 4,441,741.].8 --- --- - TOTAL DISBURSEMENTTS $4,441,741.1.8 $ 405,123.99 $39,974.751 Fund Balance, Ending $ -0-$(286,547.92) $ 6,500.39 ( ) Deficit 72 II CLIMING REIMBURSABLE ACCOUNTS PROGRAMS TOTAL $ 21,157.15 $ (35,105.99) $ (209,969.69) $ 16,900.05 $ --- $ 16,900.05 142.65 62,976.73 63,119.38 87,844.48 --- 87,844.48 13,198.16 130,912.73 490,150.66 38,462.25 26,375.27 66,869.11 --- 31.859.66 4,473,600.84' $156,547.59 $ 7.52,124.39 $5,198,484.52 $ 33,202.53 $ 153,343.26 $ 311,988.03 1,826.67 3,672.68 .256,911.32 94,247.12 75,090.60 226,699.09 3,153.53 41,915.33 55,952.06 570.00 --- 4.,442,311.18 $132,999.85 $ 274,021.87 $;,293,861.68 $ 44,704.89 $ (57,003.47) $ (305,346.85) 73 Crl'Y of IOWA CITY S'GYPEMENPS OP 'rRANsACCIoNs BY FUND INTRAG99RNAENTAL SERVICE FUNDS - DISBURSEMENPS Fiscal Year Ended Jame 30, 1976 PERSONAL SERVICES Salaries and Wages Part-time and Overtime Pension and Retirement Employee Insurance Subtotal PAYROLL CGWDITIES lies $ Office Supplies Operating Supplieslies ---- Repair F, Maintenance Supp _ ----0_ Subtotal SERVICES AND WARGES Professional Services Communications Transportation $ F,duc Property .A Liability lt,urance Public Utility Service Repairs 8 Maintenance Technical Services Aid to Other Agencies Miscellaneous Subtotal CAPITAL OUTLAY Land Sctures, Improvements 8 Buildings Equipment Subtotal TRANSFERS TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS EQUIP,ENP MAIMEXI ANCE UIV- _--I IIN - $ --- L4,441,741.18 $4,441,741.18 "74 $100,432.80. 9,214.00 6—�S.44 $12$,442.74 $ 207.78 01,773.78 135630.32 $227$ $ 1,148.,00 1,296.,49 123.00 1,740.51 7,242:30 24,482;77 3,534.04 1, 619.,86 $ 412-1—'1.67 2,43.4.60 8,448.60 $ 10� 0 $405y4 CENTRAL SUPPLY $ PANS CLEARING REIb1BURSABLE AccamS ERROGRAMS $ $ --- $104,713.24 ' 191.50 32,388.88 --- 26,469.14 11,708.26 --- 6,541.89 42532.88 $ -0- $ 33,202.53 $153;343:26 $23,010.41 789.68 $ 580.31 1,052.76 _ 1,114.78 624.47 ---__ 131_58 1,99S.45 $23,800.09 $ 1,826.67 $ 3,672.68 $ --- 166.48 $ 7,309.71 $ 58,844.80 76.54 3,248.42 14,017.77 3,046.25 ___ --- 1.,954.93 2,156.39 11501.10 2,157.19 419.23 2,052.81 ___ 15,751.43 3,451.30 12,350.73 54,934.48 2,072.86 $16,174.70 $ 94,247_12 751090.60 $ --- $ --- 9• --- --- 3,024.58 ---__ 128.95 41,915.33 $ -0-_ $ 32153.53 _ $ 41_ 915,33 $ --- $ 570.00 $ --- 39 974.79 ----- $132,999.85 $'1.74,021.87 75 TOTAL $ 214,146.04 41,794.38, 38,177.40 17,870.21 $_,311,988.03 $ 24,851.26 94';30?:71 _ 137,752.35 $ 256,911+32 $ 67:13QZ„51 47$7;63 17,18T�'02 3,695,44 7,661,53 30; 849:;16 24, 23T.!87 _ 70,977,93 $ a26_ ,699.09 $ --- 5,459.18 50,492.88 $ 55,952.06 $42442,311.18 5 2913 8. 61.68 CITY Or IOWA CITY ' 1I A I'I MI iM' 01+ TRANSACT' I ONS BY FUND SPECIA1. ASSINSMIM' IlIND.S Fiscal Year Ended ,June 30, 1976 Fund Balance, Beginning ( ) Deficit PAVING $(413,404.52) RECEIPTS Other: Intergovernmental Revenue $ --- Assessment Collections 124,785.25 Transfers In --- TOTAL RECEIPTS $ 124,785.25 DISB1JRSE1V M'S Services & Charges: Publications Legal Fees Capital outlay: Construction Debt Service: Bonds Interest Transfers Out TO'T'AL DISBURSEVTDV'I'S Fund Balance, Ending ( ) Deficit 39,000.00 $ 39,000.00 SEWER $_(55,838..-491 $ --- 19,886.04 $ 19,886.04 $(327,619.27) $(35,952,45) 76 S1DEI .nrs $ S 03-01.15 9, 48,$4 60 $ 9,485;60 $ 48,3015:17) STREET NEW WORKING I,IGHTIDIG CONS�ON CAPITAL $ 930.23 $ 2,246.22 $572,662.37 TOTAL $ 612S61.66 $ ---$ 4,482.50 $ --- $ 4,482.50 '-' 7,003.71 40,330.77 191,586.97 1,870.04 -_ 8,873.75 $ 371.33 $11,486.21 $ 42,200.81 $20,42943.22: , it $ --- $ 56.76 $ 518.25 $ 56.76 --- .__ 516.25 --- 13,242.42 ___ 1,,242.42 39,000.00 ___ 5,000.00 5,000.00 --- _ 9,485.60 $ -0- $132817.43 $ 5,000.00_ $ 67,303.03 $1,301.56 $ 85.00 $609,863.18 $199„201.85 77 CITY OF IOWA CITY STATEMENTS OF TRANSACTIONS BY FUND SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1976 Fund Balance, Beginning RECEIPTS Taxes $ --- Intergovernmental Revenue 1,775,902.69 Other Receipts --- Transfers In --- TOTAL RECEIPTS DISBURSEMENTS Personal Services $ --- Comnodities --- Services and Charges --- Capital Outlay --- Transfers Out 1,248,327.81 TOTAL DISBURSBENTS Fund Balance, Ending 78 $ -0- $14775,902.69 $1,243,327.81 $ 5272574.88 CITY OF IOWA CITY STATEMENrS OF TRANSACTIONS BY FUND SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS CON,tUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM FUND Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1976 Fund Balance, Beginning RECEIPTS $ -0- Block Grant: Funds $889,730.67 $889,730.67 TOTAL RECEIPTS DISBURSHAENTS Transfers Out: Urban Renewal Improvements 0.00 $800,000.00 River Corridor Study 16,664.88 Ralston Creek Study 45,150.00 South Side Park 850.00 Skills Unlimited Workshop 381.33 Architectural Barriers 343.46 Park Improvements TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS $889,730.67 Fund Balance, Ending $ -0- 79 ' CITY OF IOWA CITY SMIDOMI;S 01; TIMISACHONS BY FUND ' SPECIAL REVENUEFUNDS ROAD USE TAX FUND ' Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1976 i Fund Balance, Beginning RECEIPTS ' Road Use Tax TOTAL RECEIPTS , ,f886,172.02 $886,172.02 ' DISBURSBM- S Transfers Out: Traffic Control Operations $141,437.27 Asphalt Resurfacing Project 151,028.42 Gilbert STreet Storm Sewer 55,108.62 ' R-14 Trees 6,718.00 1974 Sidewalk Special Assessment Project 4,304.83 TOTAL DISBURSER WS $3581597,14 ' Fund Balance, Ending li $527,574.88 r I i; P i I jI 80 li I ' CITY OF IOWA CITY STKT M* 'S OF TRANSACTIONS BY FUND URBAN RENEWAL FUNDS Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1976 ' CITY-UNIVERSI79r TAX ESCROW R 1, 4 Fund Balance, Beginning _ ' 243.44 $ 470,835.62 RECEIPTS ' Federal Grants $ Financing Proceeds $ 791,071.00 Sale of Land __ - 13,499,109,28 Sale of Property 189,375.00 Interest on Securities ___ 8,1,00.00 Rental Income ___ 26,834.83 ' Other Receipts: 54,646.96 Bid Deposit Office Rental _-- 111 300.00 Miscellaneous 41545.00 T01AL RECEIPTS ----- 74.94 -0- $14,685 057.01 DISBURSEb(ENTS Commodities: Office Expenses ' Publications= $ 6„873.99 Services $ Charges: 135.50 Administrative Costs to City Travel 38,674,96 ' Legal Costas 512,68 Survey $ Planning Costs --- 20,420.51 Acquisition Costs --- 88.50 ' Operation of Acquired Property 1247,80.15 Disposition Costs 22,203.09 Site Clearance __ 10,131.63 ' Improvements 88,609.19 Relocation Expense ___ 2,.473.80 Accrued Interest ' 23,1;08.36 Deposit Refund--- 502.67 ' Miscellaneous Expense 111,300.00 Debt Service: 4.50 Notes Paid ' Interest Expense ___ 13,965,924.28 Capital Outlay: 466,559.14 Office Equipment ' Acquisition of Property 60.51 TOTAL DISBURSBENTS18— ___ 7,258.00. $ -0- $14,951015).46 Fund Balance, Ending $243.44 $ 198,873.17 II 8,1 CITY OF IOIVA CITY S1'AT34ENrS 01: TRANSACI'TONS BY FUND LOW RENT HOUSING FUNDS Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1976 SECTION 23 SECTION 23 SECTION 8 IA 22-1 IA 22-2 KC 9033E Fund Balance, Beginning $ 46,303.43 $ -0- S -U- RECEIPTS: Interest $ 5,372.68 $ --- $ $2.10 Grant from IUD 242,270.00 5,250.00 54,177.00 Rental Income 113,834.15 --- Security Deposits 1 233.95 --- TOTAL RECEIPTS 362,710.78 5, 0.00 54,259.10 DISBURSEMENTS: Administrative Costs to City $ 20,979.01 $ --- $10,258.76 Rent to Landlords 298,250.00 --- 15 907,00 Legal Expense 4.50 --- --- Travel 421.95 Auditing Fees 384.00 --- Office Expenses 153.45 --- Utilities 39.34 --- Repair $ Maintenance Costs 694,24 --- - Rent Refund 171,00 ---- Security Deposit Refunds 2,768,89 Refund to HOD 22,497„31 --- Liability Insurance 1,168.00 --- --- Office Furniture --- --- 505,69 Office Equipment 43.00 --- 693.,00 Miscellaneous Expense 13.50 27',;00 TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS 347,588.19 $-0- JZI 391.;45 Fund Balance, [finding $ 61,426.02 $5,250.00 JL2867,65 82 CITY OF IOWA CITY STATEMENT OF TRANSACTIONS BY FUND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT REVENUE BOND FUND Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1976 Fund Balance, Beginning RECEIPTS: Use of Money $ Property - Rent on Building $396,956.26 TOTAL RECEIPTS DISBURSEMENTS: Debt Service: Bonds $175.,000.00 Interest 221,956.25 TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS Fund Balance, Ending 83 $ 2.06 $396,956,26 $396,956.25 2.07 ' CITY OF IOWA CITY ' STATBIENTS OF TRANSACTIONS BY FUND POLICE AND FIRE PENSION $ RETIREMENT FUNDS ' Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1976 Fund Balance, Beginning RECEIPTS Other: Employee Contributions $ --_ $ 29,989-87 _- City Contribution 12,525.00 $ - ti� 31,Ot1��.25 Interest 13ti,703.65 13,950.00 144,1164.38 Gain on Securities 320.00 59,873.29 280,00 64,11I$1.4b Exchange --- Miscellaneous 863.75 --- 10.00 l of -401, 06 TOTAL RECEIPTS $12 845 0 24SL31, POLICE PENSION POLICE F FIRE RL7-- PENSION RETIREMENT $14,467,14 $.919,787.86__ _ 6J26-48 $ 962.997.50 DISBURSENQITS Commodities Services and Charges: Professional Services Pension $ Retirement Payments Blue Cross Federal Withholding Accrued Interest Refund Securities Transaction Expense Disability Wages Miscellaneous TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS Fund Balance, Ending - —0 $ 227,440.56 $14,230.00 $ 240 735.14 . $ --- -"" 267.50 6,553.78 325.65 63,207.63 3,134.75 9 018,32 63,437;;I5 380.00 504.00 353125 240.,OQ 1,695:(p, 3,018.35 __ 1,590,:05 "" 13,!)86.62 _ "- 3,568;;(?7 3',905„'[0 --- - -- 73.44 --- 91,910 —�_— $ 7,259.43 --- -- ----__ $ 84,192.29 --- —'—” $ 9 5p -- 245. ,1 $ 74_046.l{B $202052.71 $1,063_`03fi_13 $10,744.91 $1,,129,086.1 84 m GE\•P.RAL CAPITAL PROJECTS - PARKING PARXI`7G SEWER 01'LR\TICNS SEHTR BO.�D 4 I, rEREsT S NKM KATR OPER\TIONS WATER OPERATIONS RESERVE WATER BOLD 8 IN11' iFST RESEILVE WATER i0' G I\1TRISP S1ManG GEXERAL M -L -a E SHARE% PRwEcr GRUNN TR:LZIT `.1SMI REPIACLgMrr RESERVE ROAD USE TAX URIILV RE1'Ck%L R-14 P1817ECI TI.,.UM%RY IRAN RFFAYMEVI R-14 LEASED MUSIX 11 (EASED tIOJSING 02 FIRE PEl•SICI`7 RPM FIRE RECIR&[ELT RND POLICE PENSICN RID POLICE- REfIRI?•DN7 RM 117m CITY OF IOIVA CITY SMIARY OF INVFa'DOUS BY RIM) PERIOD I.MED J5B4E 30, 1976 INV. OI4 t41KD 7/01/75 $21365,597.10 290,315.93 107,887.56 79,562.59 113,658.33 49,062.50 246,580.11 110,015.49 393,366.02 14,779.50 125,000.00 290,000.00 155,000.0D 49,440.75 6,908.83 9S4, 944.88 7,870.70 916,865.36 $6,276,85 P UTASED $ 4,174,155.65 350,381.48 1,382,592.74 720,396.74 284,271.57 77,235.11 1,326,792.00 76,732.42 970.544.21 1,S31,013.82 87,539.9E 368,682.4G 368,147..71 744,224.35 1,050 450.3 - 198,547.83 25,082.10 649,442.01 REDMIED $ 5,491,213.45 74,370.31 1,338,186.78 342,908.52 229,750.45 156,797.70 959,412.00 96,267.50 826,442.66 11,0,015.49 1,768,195.84 623,386.70 287,766.95 844,973.98 1,205,450.39 191,983.49 482,063.66 1w. 0,14RUT 6(30/76 M VNLE $1,048,539.30 $1,0434038.53 276,011,17 276,570.43 334,721,,89 33&,591.54 377,483,22 373,736.28 162,408.68 162,,977,12' 48.1,034.33 435,817,83 29,527.42 2,9,515.93 390,681.66 392_409.39 156,184.00 157,227.73 38,932.78 38,924.03 205,9155,45 207,661.09 .363,147.71 360,131.94 189,29J.41 138-369,80 56,005.09 S6,00S.09 25,082.10 x5,082.10 6,908.83 6,24S,40 1,122,3Z3.23 1,0£52.814.30 7,870.70 7,857.60 562,271.18 434,4 16.76 1,044 ,71,9•_8 1 0G6,89S.86_ L14.948,503.75 $14 903.602.63 ,321,756_75 56=250.876.99 9p MEREST (RECEIVED $:173r 416.24 629.69 18,573.78 7,091.48 S, 249. SS 5,202.30 7,463.31 5,201.25 18,314.96 2,934,51 25,353;84 1,613.30 4,813.53 375.000.0' 190.0,60.OU, ___ 17.412.45 _-_ : 9,422.38 56,gDS,0 S,372.68 25,082;1.tl1 '7,QppcDg � 82.10 280.00 7�.144,Q011, (161 I '8,000.00 64,114.46 320.00 j' It�� I 59.873.29 S'6,424,08 A9 ,i $332,79b.10 CITY of I(fXA CITY, ICWA SfATBOU of SEa1RITIES30 976IC period Ending June Cost of Cost of Iltvesunents Interest Investments glnd Interest 1Ssrket, 'Vail �ceiva Purchase Maturity On hand Rata Value Receipt or Date purchases .Maturities 6^SO-76 C. D pNo. Type Date 7-1-7S GENERAL 1131.0 33,667.21 4.00 30.334,80 34 '0" 1,36Q.0o 2-15-80 33,(}87. 21 2,(109.06 7,50 1,986,20 2j00Q.00� IS0,00 TBo Var 2.009.06 (1,576.00 8 000.00. 340.0" TBo 5-24-73 5-15-76 - 7,683.75 4,25 1 545.00 TBo 5-24-73 5-15-75/85 7,683.75 - 26,000,00 3.25 21,216.00 26{000.001' 1,802.19 TBo 5_24.73 6-15-83 26,000.00 130,000.OD - S.SO _ _, 1,633.30 A9751 CD 3-31-7S 7-01.75 130,000.00 _ 123,366.60 _ S.47 _ r 2,82S.39 7-10-75 123,366.60 196,937.78 S.30 3>^ z_>1 7504150252 TRi 4-15-75 7.29-75 196,957.78 - 450.00 - 5..00. ^ 3,SSI.39' 7507150213 TBi 4-16-75 310,450.00 310' _ 4.90 - 2 �:.5. 00 750715021 TBi 5-14-75 8-_6-75 _ 306,118.11 _ - 750514014? TBi 5-14-75 3- U -?5 306,118.11 147,57S.cw - S.10 _ _ 2,314,52 3-28-75 147,575.00 160,.p00.U0 - S.SO _ 4,143,84 7505200211 TBi 5-20-75 250,000.00 - 5,S0 2,3S4,44 A 9759 CD 5-29-75 9-02-75 160,000.00 - _ 5.50 _ 2,165,80 A 9790 CD S-29-75 9-16-75 250,000.00 _ 160„000.00 i a9 CD 6-05-75 10-01-75 160,000.00 122,034 ()0 _ 7001.00 50159 50,000.00 - 5.25 _ 1778.33 7306130120 TBi 6-13-75 10-16-75 122'000.00 - 120,000.00 5,SO 2,270,32 103544 CD 6-17-75 9-23-75 50, _ _ 5.50 50160 CD 6-18-76 9-23-75 120,000.00 - 110,000.00 _ - _ 1•a4"'� CD 6-19-15 11-03-75 110,000.00 103,635.39 5.80 390.53 A9802 - S.SO _ 3,694.61 7506260193 TBi 6-26-75 9-11-7S 108,635.39 72,000.00 72,000.00 6.15 1,329,83 A 9834 CD 8-26-75 10-01-75 - 263,305.39 263,305.39 6.15 ' - 1,410.50 7503290063 TBi 8-23-75 11-18-75 83,670.17 83,670.17 6.20' - 1,529.33 7509090312 TBi 9-09-75 12-11-75 _ 128,589.50 128,S89.S0 6,00 _ TBi 9-18-75 11-20-7S 295,000.00 29!;,000.00 - _ _ ?,439.94 1-22-76 _ 5.85. _ 653.83 7510150215 TBi 10-14-7S - 162,560.06 162,560.06 5 80 - 7510160308 TBi 10-16-75 1-15-76 _ 113,073.11 113,073.11 7511080012 TBi 10-17-75 1-29-76 i 86 it I. 111 i No m �OM CITY OF I0161 CIlY. IOWA SfA1'@fFNT CF SECJRITIES TRANSACTIONS Yerial Ending June 30, 1976 Cost of Cost of InvestmentsInterest Investments of Hard Interest vzrb-It p Valu: Received Purchase On Hand Rate Maturity Pees .>iturities 6-30-76 Receipt or Date 7-1-75 C. D. No. Type Date 573.47 S.06 931.88 79,426.53 79,426.53 _ _ 5.06 1,103_i`s' 751120179 TBi 11-12-75 01-02-76 - 129,068.12 129,068.12 5,35 - 2,200•d= ,5112n179 TBi 11-12-75 01-02-76 - 207,347.29 207,347.29 _ $.40 7512020076 TBi 11-ZO-75 02-13-75 _ 98,800.00 98,800.40 - 5,.60 - 7511250057 TBi 11-25-75 02-13-76 - 49,123.42 19,123.42 - _ 1,430_97 12-01-75 03-25-76 6.04 3ya;7.a0 7512220014 TBi 133,029.45 133,g29.M15 - 50 - 3,972.;2 7511260065 1'M 10-07-75 01-02-76 _ 246,562.50 246,562.50 - 5,50: 7512120i11 TBi 12-12-75 03-11-76 246,027.78 246,027.78 5,54 _ _ 2,903.83 75121ZOIIZ TBi 12.12-75 03-25-76 ]G7 ,096.12 167,096,12 - 5.60 - _. 3,888.89 7512120114 Tot 12.1275 04-01-76 196,111,11 196,111,11 5 54 - 1,3784S 7512120117 TBi 12-12-75 04.15-76 _ 68,621.15 68, 621.1S - _ _, '2,32S.I 4.80 7512160089 TBi 12-16-75 OG -01 76 - 157,674.67 157,674.67 93 22S. 50 5'.07 94,779_!16 100,000�� _ 7602130252 TBi 02-13-76 07-15-76 - 98,225.50 - .73,828.67 5.02 74,757.ISa '75,D110{, 1,940.00 7603110226 TBi 03-11-76 07-22-76 - 73,828.67 - 4.60 - - 7604010257 TBi 04-01-76 06-24-76 - 198,160.00 198,160.00 7605130057 TBi 04-13-76_ 246,736.11 246,736.11 4.7q 245,281J95 �� ,a 00 - 202,812.50 _ 202,812.50 8.25 200,360140 7604130059 TBi 04-13-76 07-22"76 - 150,750.00 6.50 150,000400 ism .00 7604130047 TN 04-13-76 09-30-76 150,750.00 _ 9a 000.00 4,80 98',9611;00 10q,g00.00 _ 7604130063 IN 04-13-76 OB -15-76 _ gg,O0C.00 - 4.65, 109,781i�88 ;110'j00�-00 7604190097 TBi 04-19-76 09-16-76 _ 108,806.50 - 108,806.5q _ 250100 7604220251 TBi 04-22-76 07-15-76 99 750.00 99 750.00 1 0--y �; 1 0� '� D 7606110082 TBi 06-11-76 06-29-76 2 3 5,59 .10_ 491. 1 .45 1,04'8x539;413' SUBTOTAL . CITY OF IOWA CITY, IC1PA STATS4FNT OF SECURITIES gp NSACl'IOZ Period Ending TIES of Cost o of Investments onHand Interest Market )Interest 1fiec - Receipt or Purchase Maturity On Hans 7-1-75 Purchases Ffaturities 6-30-76 Rate Value. I(alue C. D. No. Type Date Date CAPITAL PROJECTS PARKI,% 3610.0 4,65 _ 629.69 l604060143 TBi 04-06-76 06-10-76 _ - 74,370.31 172,270.00 74,370.31 _ - 172,270.00 5,46 172,785.28 103 785.IS jj7S,00q,00 1105 000.00. - - '7606150374 TBI 06-11-76 09.23-76 - 103 741.17 103 741.17 S.20 }7 0.4180,629.69 TBi 06-25-76 09-16-76 �--' 733 11. .z. STIDTOTAL PARKI;I; - 4111.0 5,60 _ _ 1,330.2' 7504100(57 TBi 04-10-75 07-10-7S 128,159.78 64,106.43 - 128,159.78 64,106.43 - - 5,0S - - Sri. S-1 1950.28 7505220336 TBi 05-22-7S 08-28-75 10-23-75 98,048.72 98,048 7; - 5.90 _ 625.52 7506260308 TBi 7510030039 TBi 06-26-75 10-03-75 12-11-75 54,374.58 143,346.96 54,374.58 143,346.96 - S.33 _ _ _, 1,653.04 2,23'z.67 7512150211 TBi 12-11-75 02-26-76 05-04-76 - 107,862.33 107,862.33 - 5.30 S.00 `_ 861.11 7512230248 TBi 76QI020360 TBi 12-24-75 01-03-76 03-04-76 - 99,138.89 97,777 00 99,138.89 97,777.00 - - 4.94 ., 2,223.00 . 3,105,25 7601140260 TBi 01-14-76 01-14-76 06-2M1-76 05-20-76 - - 176,894.85 176,894.85 98,693.33 - - 4.89 4.80 '_ 1,306.6, 1,261,36 7601140258 TBi 7602190223 TBi 02-19-76 OS -27-76 06-03-76 - - 98,693.33 98,738.64 98,?38.64 - 53,756,77 4.99 9.25 - 54,122,54 S, 000:00 7],6.29 7603040290 TBi 03-04-76 OS -12-76 10-15-76 224,801.04 171,044.27 167,S49,40 S.3S 1; 8,570.73 .170,000,06 - 7b06170014 TBi 7605210214 TBi 05-21-76 08-26-76 _ 167,549.40 113 415.72 - -1, 113 415.72 5.45 113 908.27 s36.5 1. 4 115 000,00 ,340.000.00, , 16.573.7& 7606030274 TBi 06-03-76 09-02-76 0� 31 1`383-5` 3-31. 1$5 3 1. 9 SuBT'OTAL M Receipt or C. D. No. Type SETS O1A PERATIMS 4211.0 7508190110 TBi 7512160091 TBi 7604220252 TBI 7605150144 TN SUBTOTAL CITY OP IOWA CITY, IOWA SfATS46Vf of SECURITIES 30*m-r2CNS Period Ending Cost of Investments Purchase Maturity On Hand p,atchases Date Date 7-1-75 Cost of investmenFacq on Hand is Interest Market; Value Maturities 6-30 7_ 6 RaValue te 6.30 171,355.63 171,355.63 _ S,S4 12-16-75 171,552.89 1'11,552.89 197,038.22 4.76 08-19-75 04_22-76 _ 197,038.22 _ 6.50 12 -16 -TS _ 180, 0 5D-00 04-22-76 08-12-76 180,450.110 377 488.22 08-15-76 _:�— 20_ 3_ 95 42 9_.-.s. �--.SZ '_---- 05-18-76 S1:UirF LJ.0 $ INIQIPST RESI`RVE 4232.0 5,605,40 7502130218 TBi 02-13-75 03-27-75 7503250001 7503030635 TBi TBi 07-03-75 09-19-75 7601020071 TBI TBi 12-29-75 03-11-76 7603110219 TBi TBi 06-30-76 SUBTOTAL - SET�FR BrID 8 INTEREST SINKING 4233.0 7505190044 TBi 05-16-74 7506050290 TBi 06-15-75 7512010101 TBi 12-01-75 interest geceived 3,644.37 3,4,47.11, 198,736.28 180�00,1A� 180 OOO.t(QI 39,,994-1P6 50,00;00 122 99831.106 'Loo 5.34 - 28,948,10 5,45 - 01-13-76 28,948.10 _ 50,235.11 �0-_614.49 _ 5,95 11-28-75 50,614.49 77 - _ 77 23S.1111 15 97. 0 -0- 06-29-76 89 �I1I 1,524.44 588.00 2,514.1x 361.66 261.'.5'4 TIx49 ;55 5,605,40 68,475.56 07-03-75 68,475.56 39,412.00 _ 39,412.00 82,485.89 _ 6.OS 6.20 07-03-75 - 82, 485.89 29,638:34 - 5.34 11-28-75 '_ 29,638.34 9,738.66 9; 38.66 - 39,377.78 S. 06-29-76 - 39,377.78 - 123 030.90 5.35 07-01-76 10-14-76 123 030.90 284,2 1.57 229. 50.4 16 107�87�56 interest geceived 3,644.37 3,4,47.11, 198,736.28 180�00,1A� 180 OOO.t(QI 39,,994-1P6 50,00;00 122 99831.106 'Loo 5.34 - 28,948,10 5,45 - 01-13-76 28,948.10 _ 50,235.11 �0-_614.49 _ 5,95 11-28-75 50,614.49 77 - _ 77 23S.1111 15 97. 0 -0- 06-29-76 89 �I1I 1,524.44 588.00 2,514.1x 361.66 261.'.5'4 TIx49 ;55 CITY OF IO"NA CITY, Iaa SIATBE-;r OF SECURITIES TRANSACTIONS Period Ewing June 30, 1976 EN Cost of Cost of Investments Investments O1 Hand Interest Market Face Interest Receipt or Purchase Maturity On 141nd 7-1-75 Purchases Maturities 6-30-76 Rite. value �{alue Received C. D. No. Type Date Date laTER OPERATION 4311.0 1.331'67 7505220322 TBi OS -22-75 08-14-75 113,658.33 - 113 658.33 ' - - 5.00 6.39 - _ ^ 2,8:6.69 7508140308 TBi 08-14-7S 11-13-75 - 172,173.31 138,587.17 172,173.31 138,587.17 5 19 - ., 1,412.83 ii, 630;00. 7511130183 TBi 11-13-75 01-22-76 05-13-76 - - 177,340.00 177,340.00 _ 4.7S - " 93,23 7602020004 TBi 7602190192 Tai 01-22-76 02-19-76 05-04-76 - 123,802.08 123,802.08 - 177,200.00 4.6Q. 5.00 _ 179.973.25 " 18Q,0C0:OQ> 7603110219 TBi 03-11-76 07-01-76 - 177,200.00 233,851.11 - 233,851.11 - 4.40 2,143,39 ^ 7603250308 TBi 03-25-76 05-04-76 - 103,814.44 - 108,814.44 4.85 109,531.25 110'*O O([ - 7605100100 TBi TBi OS -30-76 05-12-76 07-29-76 10-28-76 - 950 495 033:$9 5.30 33 495813., 4 �.�� • x.31 7605120147 113,- 6$8.33 1.326!792.00 �g, 1 833 SUBrOI'AL KNIER OPERATIONS 6 RESERVE 4232.0 5,88 ^ - 2,406_?�i 7410010493 TN 10-02-75 08-15-75 49,062.50 47,20S.00 49,062,50 47,205.00 47,205.00 - _ 7.05 - _ 2,795.00;'! 7508180132 TBi TBi 08-18-75 06-30-76 06-01-76 10-14-76 - -T6—BT--5T 29 527.42 5.35 29 515.931 i 36 000:OD k9 - 1--5' Trargo 3b,i8L 4� SUBTOTAL EN wm r CITY OF IOM CITY, IC"rA aS SEAT pT'jod Batt jure 30. 1976 91 Cost of interest Cost of Investments Interest Hand plzrket pace value Receival Investments On Rate 6 -SD -76 Value _�- �- on band purchases Idaturities Receipt or purchase Dateez2ty 7-1_7— S — C. D. No. Type Date ----- ---�' 1,3D6.67 BOND 6 INTEREST RFSERVE _ 5.60 - _ 2.113 22 6,470.14 KATER 4333.0 07-03-75 58,693.33 58,693.13 1&7,886.78 - S-20 6.45 - - _ - 904.17 108.26 7502130218 TBi 02-13-75 44-17-75 07-03-75 187,886.78 243,529.86 243,529.86 - 74,095.83 6 20 5.60, - - 7,�Y . ,50 7504180092 TBi TBi 07-03-75 12-04-75 11_28-75 - 74,095.83 19,649.36 19,649.36 - - 5.93 - 29,4 � D(j 3 ,0 ;04 _ - 7507030626 .�i 09-19-75 03-25-76 - 242,587.50 242,587.50 29,533.33 5.04 8.70 245; 78.75 25q,440�,0.1� 7512220014 TBi TBi 12-01-75 12-04-75 06-01-76 -_ 29,533.33 243,825.00 323.33 5.50 i 117 335.1)°0')-b1F 120�006.D1� S 7512040242 7603110219 TBi TBi 03-11-76 06-01-76 07-01-76 11-04-76 243,825.04 117 323.33 117 - 117 32 - 6 44,- 6 7606010334 06-25-76 11-18-764' 1 ,S4 TBi SUBTOTAL 373.35'. INTEREST SINKING 5.14 -_ 2 611-16 WATER BOM6 14,626.65 - _ 4334.0 05-16-75 11-18-75 14,626.65 95ST�84 - - 95 3&8.84 7,1--' 0.M- '� 44 �_- _ 0- 7505190042 TBi 'TBi 06-05-75 11-28-75 �-- 7506050290 SUBTOTAL 91 M• ■) Receipt or 44,338.50 108,084.17 Purchase C. O. No. Type late GB,\L' W, IU:VEVJB SI4IRIM - _ 5215.0 F 5216.0 5.50 _ 07-31-75 7503280001 Ili 03.27-75 7506260123 TBi 04-01-75 7504080105 TBi 04-08-75 7505150519 TBi 07-31-75 7507100516 TBi 07-10-75 7507030083 TBi 07-08-75 7307110345 TBi 07.11-75 75(17290202 Ili 07-29.75 9503140303 TBi 08-14-75 7511240063 Ili 09-23-75 7512160089 TBi 12-16-75 7512130191 TBi 12-18-75 7601060263 TBi 01-06-76 7604060143 TBi 04-06-76 7605120146 TBi 05-12-76 SUBTOTAL 1S6 184.00 1,531,013. 2 �� 7d8,19S.84 PROJECT GREEN 5321.0 7503280001 TBi 03-27-75 7507030635 TBi 07-03-75 7601020071 TBi 12-29-75 TBi 06-29-76 SUBTOTAL Lm r /� CITY OF IOWA CITY, IOWA STAl"BIEUr OF SECURITIES 1RAM=I(m Period Brading Tuna 30, 1976 Cost of Investments Maturity pa Hand Date 7-1-75 Purchases X11 m v Cost of Investments On Hand Interest Maturities 6-30-76 Rate Market Value 07-03-75 07-24-75 44,338.50 108,084.17 - 44,338.50 5.40 _ 08-21-75 122,234.38 - _ 108 ,084. 17 1'22'234'38 5.50 _ 07-31-75 118,708.97 - 1.18,708.97 - 5.90 _ 10-09-75 10-16-75 _ 147,732.58 1.47,732.58 5.93 11-13-75 - 118,016.67 118,016.67 - 5,95 - 10-23-75 - - 97,916.67 108,357.64 97,916.67 108,357.64 6.00 _ 09-23-75 12-18-75 - 163,904.45 168,904.45 - 6,2S 5'80 04-22-76 - 256,118.05 256,118.05 _ 6.25 - 04-29-76 - - 39,212.09 156,748.89 39,212.09 156,748.89 5,54 - 04-15-76 06-10-76 - 142,998.19 142,998.19 -_ S•SO - 4.97 - 10-21-76 - 138,824.59 138,824.59 - 4.65 - - 3.5�5�,33b-02 1S6 184.00 1,531,013. 2 �� 7d8,19S.84 156,184.06 184 0 5.30 15t,227. 227 /3) Face Interest Vmlue Received 661.50 1,915.8.1 2,765.6 Z2,291,0.?( 1,933-33 - I,642.5rt - 1,095.5�i 3,541.21 - 787,92 3,251.1:, 892.1 2,175,41 1:0,0DOJ00 - 10,OOD.00 25,353.83, 07-03-75 12-26-75 14,779.50 - 14,779.50 5.40 - 06-29-76 24,260.55 24,260.SS 6,OS 220,501 12-16-76 24,346.65 - 24,346.65 _ 5.34 T9.4S� 38,932.78 14,779.50 87,539.98 _ Zt3,38 .708 38,932.78 5.65 932.78 38,924.03: MO,OQO,Ifxl - 38,924.03' 40,OIH1.1� 1,615. 0' Q CITY OF IJWA CITY, ICKA SfATB M'OC SECURITIES TRANSACCI(Y48 Period Ending June 30, 1976 93 Cost of Cost of ' Investments Investments On Hand Interest Market Face Interest Receipt or Purchase Maturity Date On Hand 7-1-75 Purchases Maturities 6-30-76 Rate Val_ ue Valuz Received C. D. No. Type Date TRA,\SIT SYSTEM REPLAMBa RESERVE 5410.0 A 9803 CD 06-19-75 11-03-75 125,000.00 - 125,000.00 - S.50 4.89 2,037'SCI 7601140257 TBi 01-14-76 OS -13-76 - 122,962.50 39,377.78 122,962.50 - - 39,377.78 SAD 39_994.0!♦ 40,0*10 7603110219 7603250308 TBi TBi 03-11-76 03-25-76 07-01-76 05-04-76 - 39,804.4S 39,804.45 - 4.40 '770,COCI.IID 195.55? 7605120145 TBi DS -12-76 09-30-76 - 166,537.67 8,682.40 - : 7 6__95 166 537.67 2U5 S.20 167 667.11'.6 D D?` 210,0W. 10 - 1513.5?? SUUWAL 1 5,0 .00 ROAD USE TAX 8200.0 TBi 06-28-76 09-16-76 207,SSO.00 207,550.00 5.2S SAS 207,5SO.10Q 160.381-63 210,000.160 165z004.IbO _ TBi 06-29-76 12-16-76 - 160,597.71 368,147.71 - 0- 160,597.71 368,147.71 368,73li95 375.000) -a SMOTAL 0- URILW RE' S' %L R-14 IIKCoop 02 21-75 08-04-75 290,000.00 - 290,000.00 _ LOS 6.07 - _ 9,527.2'- 407,50 98-016817 TBi 07-25-75 10-23-75 - 39,410.00 39,410.00 - 6 78 - - 5, 917.74 98-0213S7 TBi 08-04-7S 01-15-76 - 247,123.90 247,123.90 519.17 GSK 1026690 TBi 01-15-76 02-26-76 - 99,480.83 99,480.83 - 4,4S - - 64.5.69 GSK 120711-6 TBi 02-26-76 04-15.76 99,394.31 99,394,31 4,4S 43.5.0 6 GSK 146032-9 TBi OS -03-76 06-24-76 - - 69,564,94 S9,331.66 69,564.94 - - S9,331.66 4.55 S.20 59,505.10 60,GQ0;Q0 TBi BKCoop 06-28-76 06-28-76 09-16-76 12-01-76 - 129 918.75 - B34;�373?JB 129 918.75 1 5,80 129 064A10 .FIS-�DOiO� 13D C'�0;100 - SUSIOTAI,Sb�Ob'0-03 44. .39 .41 93 94 0 7Eli N�1 I. CITY OF IOWA CITY, IOWA STATB'II-Nr OF SEORITIES 7MISACrICN3 Period Ending June 30, 1976 Receipt Purchase Haturi tY Cost of Investments On Hand Cost of Investments C. D. No. . Type — Date Date 7-1-7S Purchases 1fhturities 0 Hand 6-30-76 Interest Market dace Interest Rate V11ue lYal4 Received PRPIECr TDIPORARY "OAN REPAIDO: T RIND R-14 •-- GSK 956373-2 GSK 997938-8 BKCoop FICB 03-03-75 06-09-7S 09-02-75 135,(100.00 - 135,000.00 GSK 21361-2 TBi 08-04-75 10-01-75 09-04-75 20,(100.00 20,000.00 _ 6,05 7")5 - - 4,061.52 GSK 90264-- TBi TBi 09 -O4 -7S 09-11-7S 353,211.69 494'489'87 353,211.69 - 5,05 _ - 983.58 GSK 105485-5 TBi 12-18-75 01-22-76 04-01-76 04-1S-76 9,884 494,4119.87 9,864.58 - 5.$0 - 1,788.31 333.25 - 135 Obb�iS 192 884.25 1.05 . 5(i 34 192 SEA 25 1�i13`43b_ �- _ 4.f�S - - 135,42 2 �- -W 115 7S 1.USE ) HOUSING - H1 6S-3360 SA 2800 16760 FICB TBi 11-15-74 12-30-74 08-04-75 10,091.42 10,000.00 531.80 - 10,000.00 10,623,22 5.00 10,623.2Z 10,623.22 531,80 2925G FICB 01-08-75 07-04-75 08-04-75 19,349.33 10,000.00 - 19,349.33 _ 8.45 6'40 - - 653.75 TBi TBi 07-03-75 07-25-75 01-02-76 11-06-75 - 19,399.75 10,000.00 19,399.75 8.4$ - - - 650..6? 633.75 16301 17219 TBi TBi 08-04-75 10-16-75 - 19,667.93 19,789.78 19,667.93 6.1S 6.18 - - 606.25 17299 TBi 10-16-75 04-31-76 - 19,662.39 19,789.78 19,66!.39 - _ S,8() - - - 332.07 210.22 17487 50182 TBI 01-03-76 06-17-76 - - 19,571.75 19,571.75 - 6.10 5.55 - - 337.61 66-0431 SA 02-02-76 06-01-76 - 19,542.56 20,000.00 19,542,S6 20,000.00 5'20 - - - 428,25 457,44 SUBTOTAL d1 '� ,4 60,381.87 198,547.83 -15,000.00 191.983.49 45,381.87 5.0045,381.37 45,331,87 175-00 56,005.09 T61005.09 1,b,00S; 171.87 94 0 Receipt or Purchase C. D. No. Type Date LEASED HOUSING /2 65-3410 SA 06-07-76 TOTAL LEASED HOUSIAG CITY OF IOWA CITY, ICRUA SIATE4EW OF SE11RITIFS TRANSA fiats Period EndLng ,lune 30, 1976 Cost of Cost of Investments Investments Maturity On HLtd On Hind Interest Market Date 7-1-7S Purchases Maturities 6-30-76 Rate Value Face Valve: 25 082. y9 10 - 25 082.10 S.00 2S 081:10 25,032 10 9.4 23.62 .93 M83_49 8iT0 i ; 81 08 Ui1S gI- �ngg- TBo 08-10-64 02 -IS -80 6,908.83 - _ 6,908.83 ,9WKS 4.00 _62_4."rc40 b.1Q; FIRE RECIRE4i-M' FUND SB 05-22-61 05-01-71/81 5,000.00 SB 01-31-62 01- -7220000.00 51000.00 3.7S S,000.�j0 N Various OS -15-76 ,11,967.50 _ _ 20,000.00 3.7S 20,000;1?0 TN 06-24-71 02-15-77 15,905.63 - - 11,967.50 7.50 12,072:1'0 TN Various 08-1S-77 31,105.89 - 15,905.63 8.00 15,165.10 420046 TN 12-29-72 2� 72 O8 -1S-79 _ 10,015.07 _ 31,105.89 7.75 30,33(p';1�0 TBo Various 02-15-80 225,543.75 10,015.07 6.25 9,780L 0 TBo 03-16-72 - 02-15-82 202,006.14 4.00 182,008; 0 TBo 08-15-72 08-1S-84 - 64,610.00 _ 25,343.75 6.38 23,550;1 Tga 06-15-78/83 3,000.00 _ 64,610.00. 6.38 SS 0. TBo 01-02-59 OS -15-85 27,230.94 _ - 3,000.00 3.2S 2,448;,(0 TBo TBo Various OS -15-75/85 25,642.51 - 27,230.94 _ 2S,642.S1 3.2S 24,480�Y10 F,',,% Various Various 11-15-86 03-10-92 27,941.25 _ 29,555.63 _ 27.941.25 4.25 6,13 24,660710' 25,424,h(0 FVdA Various 06-10-925842500 _ _ 29,555.63 7.00 26,784.;C0 T8o Various OS -15-76 ,. 24,860.00 - 24,860.00 58,425.00 7,05 S4,240C 6.S0 - eM 77 000_60 7, O,O: CITY OF IMLk Cm. IM SfATROU OF SEOL'RITIES RANSA 6IQNS Period EndhI June Cost of Ii3cerest Cost of lrffestmmts interest tiarket Face RIe[aived Investvcnts Cil Hand Value VaI^ ne 6-30-76 Rate Maturity on Hand purchases Dlaturities —_ Receipt or purchase 7-1-75 �_ _ Date Date 4,109.00 5'000.00. 212.50 C. 0. No. Type �— 4.25 10,000.00' 300.00 _ 4,956.26 8 1gp�00 10.880.00 9,990.63 3.90 150,656.00 160,001.01 03-15-87/92 4,956.26 - 147,800.00 6.80 3,877,50 TOO 11-12-65 U� 15-95 9,990.63 _ - 7.OS 4,600,00 TBo 07-26-55 09.10-82 147.800.00 110,000.00 _ 9,20 _ _ 412.61 7411070325 F1. 11-07-74 11-25-75 110,000.00 50,(00.00 _ S.OS _ 919'08 FfR.B 05-01-75 25_76 50,000.00 29,587.58 6.15 484.51 7505010492 P(0.B 05-19-75 0: - 29,587.58 20,000.00 _ 6.15 - _ 2,062.50 7505160137 p5-22-75 08-28-75 20,000.00 - 34,515.69 _ 7,50 _ 1,991.11 7505220336 T0i 03-01-76 34,515.69 - _ 1 2 2 FIi 05-23-76 55,025.78 5.60 _ ,725.00 7,506,30_11 06-28-75 11.18-75 - 55,025.78 98,008.09 _ 5.75 ` i 7508290068 Tlii 10-01-75 04-01-76 98,008.89 60,065,62 - S' 66 49.801.63 SO,100.QQ' 4,125.00 710010144 BKCoop 04-01-76 60,065.62 - 47,971.83 661,00 17,0 dCO:QG _ 1Bi 11-25-75 09_15-76 0.7�g71.63 110,928.13 T•SO 120 121.10 ?,0,100;01 7511250055 02-25-76 07-27-76 110,928.13 000.!x7 16(2250206 Tho Z 20,131.25 1.50 °O6 00 Q7 - 11-12-75 09_10-76 0,181.25 98,879.38 7.75 64�T8g•g7 65,000.00 _ 7511120156 fN t 98,879.38 63,984.84 - 3.02 59y9S0.00 60,000,,1'0 7511280162 * 11-19-75 08_15-76 - _ 6q 1'"- 9 4t.� TNo 03-03-76 08_15-77 63,984.84 59,880.60 6.50 Y, •4.,061 _s --- 76G4010251 TNo 04-01-76 07_22-76 _ 59,880.60 - 1,,082 819 : 6 4010257 TBi 04-01-76 01_30-78 4822 06L6T QI:Z i 1 05-17-76 1__•88 64J 442 1605170344 TH --'SUBTOCAL 320.001 7,857.60 8.0-60 1 0.00. 7 870.70 4.00 85 .607 8.000m6 POLICE PENSION FUND 77 870 - �_ -570.70 TBo 12-25-64 02-15-80 _p- i SUBTOTAL Receipt or Pure C. D. No. Type Date POI.ICF, RFrIRH%tWr FUND 7505220336 TBi 05-22-75 7$06230211 FICB 06-23-75 7508290068 TBi 08-28-75 CITY OF Ia'81 CITY, ICNA SPATDOJT OF SECURITIES TRAASACCICM Period Ending June 30, 1976 RPM I SB 05-22-61 Cost of SB 01-01-62 TN 03-02-69 Investor nts IN Various Interest IN Various Interest Received TN '06-24-71 Maturities TN Various 420046 TBo 12-Z9-72 OS -01-71 TBo Various 5,000.00 20,000.00 TBo Various S,000.W .20,boQ1_00 TBo 03-26-59 20,000.00 - 4,987.50 - TBo Various b.Z,'S TBo Various 312,50 11,300.00 TBo Various 19,148.75 F%A% Various _ 241.144,00 Rh IA Various OS -15-76 TDO 07-06-55 741lQ70325 FNMA 11-07-74 7505010492 FIU 05-01-75 7505160137 FHD.B OS -19-75 7505200211 TBi 05-20-75 7505220336 TBi 05-22-75 7$06230211 FICB 06-23-75 7508290068 TBi 08-28-75 CITY OF Ia'81 CITY, ICNA SPATDOJT OF SECURITIES TRAASACCICM Period Ending June 30, 1976 RPM I 97 Cost of Cost of Investor nts Investmmts an Fund Interest Market Fgce. 'Palm Interest Received Maturity Date On Hand 7-1-75 Purchases Maturities 6-30-76 Rate Value OS -01-71 5,000.00 _ 5,000.00 20,000.00 3.I5 3.I5 $,000.00 20.000.00 S,000.W .20,boQ1_00 300.00 1,200.00 06-01-72 20,000.00 - 4,987.50 - 4,987.50 - b.Z,'S - - - 312,50 11,300.00 02-15-76 05-15-76 19,148.75 - 19,148.75 - 23,920.(10 6.50 7.50 _ 241.144,00 24j90b.W IY,800.00, OS -15-76 23,920.20 - - - - 10,608.75 8.00 10,110,00 'INOOQ.OQ' 1 HMO 11;93:.50 02-15-77 10,628.75 26,007.50 7.7S 2$,275.00 25,OOq.60' 437.50 08-15-77 26,007.50 - 7,010.56 6,:;5 4,846.00 7''000.001 ; 08-15-79 7,010.56 183,042.00 4,00 00 104,164.80 1�34,Oi'Q.001 17,360.00 455,00 02-15-80 183,043.00 - 11,377.50 3 11,424.00 '14j00D.00! 06-15-78/83 05-15-85 11,877.50 - 45,385.00 45,385.00 3.2S 40,800.00 20,550.00 50;000.0 -iS;OQb.OQ X1.625.00 '1.062.5Q 05-15-75/85 21,333.13 21,333.13 27,941.25 4.25 6.13 25,424.00 2'F OQ. '14;000.007 1,715-02 11-15-86 OS -15-84 27,941.25 73,556.00 - _ 73,556.00 6.53 7.00 69,935,40 35,712,00 40;0O41.Q0' !4,117.50 '2,300.00 03-10-92 39,455.63 _ 39,455.63 48,675.00 7 -DS 45.200,00 5D"000.00' 3,525,Q0 33D-00 06-10-92 02-15-95 48,675.00 10,989.69 _ 10,939.69 3-00 6.80 8,998.00 141,240.00 n,000.00! 1SQ.000.eel 110.200.QD 09-20-82 133,562.50 _ 138,562.50 7,05 - - 2,996.25 11-25-75 85,000.00 - 85,000.00 50,000.00 - - 9,20 -- 4,600.00 566.67 02-25-76 08-28-75 50,000.00 - 39,433.33 - 39,433.33 - 5 IO S4S - - 68.73 08-28-75 4,931.27 - 4,931.27 20,000.00 - - 6,15 - 919.29 664.20 03-01-76 20,000.00 47,335.80 47,335.80 _ 6,15 - 11-18-75 - 97 GRAM TOTAL TYPE TBi - Treasury Bill TN - Treasury Moto CITY OF IOWA CITY, IOWA 1f�TT OF S631RITXES WNSP=ICtG STAT@ period Fsdlug Jtme 30. 1976 Cost of Investments Maturity On jund purchases Date 7-1-75 Cost of FaSe Interest Imesbaenu Value Receil' on 11ud Interest Value t Maturities 6-30-76 Rat_=� 40,018.75 purchase Receipt or C. D. ho. Type late �--_' RETIRH T FRS (CONT.) POLICE 05-15-76 08-15-76 20,181.25 59,062.93 07-22-76 BKCOUp 10-01-75 11.12-75 7511120186 TBi 9-75 75 7511280162 7511250058 TU 11-?5 OZ"25-76 7602250206 IN 03-03-76 7604010257 'rBi 04-01-76 04-01-76 7604010253 T14 114 05-17-76 7605170344 60,OOQ;'00 7Z,.0Pg1•00 SUBTOTAL - 59,062.93' 73,395.00 GRAM TOTAL TYPE TBi - Treasury Bill TN - Treasury Moto CITY OF IOWA CITY, IOWA 1f�TT OF S631RITXES WNSP=ICtG STAT@ period Fsdlug Jtme 30. 1976 Cost of Investments Maturity On jund purchases Date 7-1-75 Cost of FaSe Interest Imesbaenu Value Receil' on 11ud Interest Value t Maturities 6-30-76 Rat_=� 1 756.75 66 27� 14 ,94 1 4 go -3 602.63 6 32 24 60-19 332,790'10 6,2s0,s11"q 6, 4 D,Coop - Hank for C,00perativec Qe'Acsoa'oltlou FRa Federal Lai rmdtatei p -edit; Bar'P - SA - Savings AccOmt FICA FO3era1 tyyc loan Bimk SB - Savings Bow sit FF08 CD - Certificate of De Po 40,018.75 04-01-76 - 47,971.84 07-27-76 09-10-76 - 100,843.75 73,SO6.67 04-01-76 - 50,054.69 05-15-76 08-15-76 20,181.25 59,062.93 07-22-76 73,395.00 9 900-50 04 30-76 -�--- 56-15-77 916 86,E 5.36 3— , 1 756.75 66 27� 14 ,94 1 4 go -3 602.63 6 32 24 60-19 332,790'10 6,2s0,s11"q 6, 4 D,Coop - Hank for C,00perativec Qe'Acsoa'oltlou FRa Federal Lai rmdtatei p -edit; Bar'P - SA - Savings AccOmt FICA FO3era1 tyyc loan Bimk SB - Savings Bow sit FF08 CD - Certificate of De Po 1,SOO.OU 7 SO 49,SOI.45 00'Qdp.,Op 3,7S0.0D 40,°X8.75 47,971.84 S.66 100,6004010 100,09 1,495.13 - 100,843.75 7.50 5.60 - - - 1�437„�0 73,506.67 _ 5.75 _ 20,12 q, p0. 20„00%'00 20 - 50,054.69 20,181.25 " 7.SO 5.02 60,OOQ;'00 7Z,.0Pg1•00 - - 59,062.93' 73,395.00 6.SO 72,7911.bO d9 sl' DC .00 1'0 f01h�.U0 49 900.501 %Oi 06y_,_, 1 044 ,a,a16 _ 1 756.75 66 27� 14 ,94 1 4 go -3 602.63 6 32 24 60-19 332,790'10 6,2s0,s11"q 6, 4 D,Coop - Hank for C,00perativec Qe'Acsoa'oltlou FRa Federal Lai rmdtatei p -edit; Bar'P - SA - Savings AccOmt FICA FO3era1 tyyc loan Bimk SB - Savings Bow sit FF08 CD - Certificate of De Po By SCIODULU L•MQR .RINE 01976 PPERIODE CRY TREASURY TREASURY FEDERAL NAT'L, dfm;ER NOTE MORTGAGE ASSOC, TOTAL— ChSll B�_ BOND -- $ $; 834,145.07 �,D $ 625,596.78 $ 69,380.02 $353_562.50 --- 46,560 SS GENERAL 46,860-36 46,860.36 ___ 40,1;70_013 DEBT SERVICE -__ --- --- (15,506,40) C,VTTAL PR(UECPS: 40,170.63 --- ___ --- --- _,_ Water System Construction (15,506.40) "- ___ --- Park Improvements (31,864.23) --- ___ --- __- __- 7,873.1'5 Pollution Control (51,434.55) _-- --- --- 250, 60.i9 Street Construction 7,873.75 --- ___ --- Bridge Construction (25,050.88) __- 276,011.17 - ___ ___ --- 5,830.36 Parking Facilities ___ --- - ___ --- Landfill Improvements 5,880.36 _ '"' 339,$44.,611 Other ENITRPR1SF:: 5,122.72 334,721.89 --- """ 180,450.00 ",_ 231,32676 52„400,40 Park 'v1g (146,159.M16) ___ 197,038.22 --- ___ -__ --- ___ 174M9S7i00 Sewer Operations Sewer Renewal £, Improvement 52,.{00.00 12,578.32 -'- ___ 162,408.68 - --- '-” ___ _ --- ___ 24;64'.,41' 2851178,.7;2. Sewer Bond Reserve 24,642.42 --" __- ^ --- 81,000Mi Sewer Bond Sinking Reserve (195,SG0.21) 481 038.33 - ___ --- --- ___ 50;000;00. Hater Operations Water Deprec., Ext., 6 Mtainc. Res. 000.00 20 472.58 _-- 29,527.42 -__ --- --_- ___ - _:, 390x678'.33 10,2971.34! Water Operations Res. (3.33) 390,681.66 ___ --- Water Bond Reserve 10,297.:54 --- ___ 250,367!-051 Water Bond Sinking Reserve ___ ___ _ 282,572.311 TRUST £, AGENCY: 250,367.05 "` --- _"- ___ 5,8881.611 Pension G Retirement 126,393.32 ___ 156,184.00 --- j General Revenue Sharing 5,598.61 --- ___ --- Library Gifts 6 Beq nests 10,204.11 38,932.78 --_ --- --- Y,441,SIR Project Green Special Populations Involvaaent 78,14 1,441.80 -"' _-- --- '^" --- 93:96 Monument Escrow 93.98 ___ "" -- _ --- "' --- Reno St. Pad's (1,425.50) '"" "" -__ 163.242.2 Staff Escrow Legal Escrow 1,831.56 (37,673.17) --- --- 205,915.45 ___ _-- TR NSIT SYSMI REPLAC501T FU\1) INfImGOVFR\JIL•' a SERVICE SPECIAL ASSES.%M SPECIAL Rll'r.\UE: Read Use Tax I ICDA WIP. MIN REPA1TONf R-14 URBAN RE.MiNAL R-14 FIRE PL'NSIM FIRE RLTIPd�fCtt�tl' POLICE PENSION POLICE REfIRI:LW LEASED MUSI\G Al LEASED IIOUSI\Y; N2 LEASEDfICUS [\G 13 R-14 TAX ESCROl9 I.\DUSTRIAL RE/E1Ri BOND TOTAL CASII $(305,346.85) 199,201.85 159,427.17 29 9,622,47 3,836.08 6,763.49 12,182.01 18,316.35 5,420.93 1,785.55 5,250.00 243.44 2.07 $ 100,639.94 SCHEDULE OF Film BAIF2JCE BY TYPE PERIOD EZED JUNE 30, 1976 TREASURY TREASURY TREASURY BILL BOND I'M 368,147.71 --- --- 59,331.66 --- --- --- 6,908,83 111,956.67 390,721.48 247,931 --- 7,870.70 --- 107_034.77 3£•1_135.13 204,01, FEDERAL MIL. MORTGAM ASSOC. - (MER .TOTAL . --- --- si7,574.88 -- 129,918.7S 198,872,86 '10,x.44,91 2 346,708.76 25,000.00 ;i,129,086,72 20,052,71 0 327,536.88 25,000.00 ;1,063,036,15' --- 56,005.09 61,426_D2 --- 25,082.10 26,367,65 $3,544,527.19 $856,016.16 $985,961.82 $674,245.64 $261,005.94 $6,422,596.69 OTHER: $129,918.75 Rank For Co-operatives in Urban Renewal R-14 56,006.09 Savings Account in Leased Housing E1 25,082.10 Savings Accounts in Police Retirement 25,000.00 Savings Bonds in Police Retirement 25,000.00 Savings Bonds in Fire Retirement 100 SIATISVICAL, S;EcTI.:0,N. '1 CITY OF IOWA CITY GENERAL GOVERNMENTAL EXPENDITURES BY FUNCTION GENERAL PUBLIC YEAR GOVERNMENT STREET SAFETY SANITATION CEMETERY 1964 $ 410,452 $425,862 $ 348,194 $180,685 $35,182 i ' 1965 494,609 384,271 367,806 212,403 28,848 1966 701,029 724,808 459,,987 171,623 31,082 1967 691,189 384,563 537,131 239,622 25,708 '1968 797,787 820,159 647,628 215,980 28,343 1969 816,907 635,859 720„806 256,962 42,893 1970 1,141,801 630,324 799,953 270,866 40,524 1971 1,984,554 735,391 1,035,5134 240,758 44,893 1972 1,415,692 804,469 1,049,014 243,595 44.,626 1973 1975 *** 1,559,3651111 2,848,770 761,140 1,762,983 1,270,100 2,205,586 376,493 700,456 45,300 78,028 a PARKS & G,O. YEAR LIBRARY AIRPORT TRANSIT RECREATION DEBT SERVICE ' 1964 $ 73,60153,074 $ $ $126,515 15']:80,649 1965 98,192 132,615* 228,048 157,513 1966 124,015 31,180 279,260 174,370 '1967 130,386 32,938 283,806 225,419 1968 133,239 27,645 319,495 204,244 1969 152,669 28,430 367,499 X80,683 1970 1971 173,890 193,127 20,999 80,326** 82,17611 507,,970 280,724 543,778 424,999 1972 208,232 32,689 312,340 478,110 636,954 1973 *** 248,647 23,832 370,063 545,212 641,900 ' 1975 427,284 45,809 745,076 806,056 810,538 i tI General Expenditures for the purpose of this comparison includes the seven functional Debt Service, Trust & Agency, Liquor Profits, and Road Use Tax. These.Expend- 'funds, itures have been restated in certain cases to eliminate expenditures paid for out of bond issues in an attempt to portray support of these functions from operating funds. * Includes Purchase of Land and Improvements of $112,458 ** Includes Improvements of $57,262 i 11 The Transit System was operated by the City from September 1, 1971 through the end the year. 'of 1111 Includes Transfer of $32,467 to close Liquor Profits Fund ' *** Eighteen This months period ended June 30, 1975 i page of historic information is retained for reference only, for presentation, of information in program accounting format as required by Home Rule Act, 1972 see page 97%,1 101 ji ;. �I Y 1 CITY OF IOWA CITY GENERAL GOVERNMENTAL EXPENDITURES BY PROGRAM 1 FISCAL COMMUNITY PUBLIC YEAR ADMINISTRATION DEVELOPMENT SAFETY TRANSPORTATION. i 1974 1975 $ 884,917 $321,512 $1,408,805 $14537,910 1976 1,151,830 1,158,571 389,754 1,473,237 14743,830 467,270 1,638,448 14428,314 1 1 i 1 it LEISURE & 1 FISCAL ENVIRONMENTAL CULTURAL PENSION & DEBT "I YEAR PROTECTION OPPORTUNITIES RETIREMENT SERVICE 1 1974 $486,631 $827,097 $442,312 $645,374 j 1975 1976 564,761 582,671 831,195 379,451 705,501 1,035,730 521,632 942,482 1 i ti i 1 � 1 i i 102 1 _ it CITY OF IOWA CITY ' GENERAL GOVERNMENTAL REVENUE BY SOURCE i I I i ' LICENSES& YEAR TAXES PERMITS FINES & CHARGES. FOR FORFEITURES ---_ SERVICES ' 1965* 1966 $1,254,138 $ 86,841 $ 1,284 491 91 545 110,816 $ 241,66_1 1967 1,779,330 83079 087 114,961 238,74T ' 1968 1,909,246 86409 115,961 343,2981 1969 2,232 006 121,199 143,223 213,653 ' 1970 1971 2,405,468 2,580,599 117,823 184,421 231,228 254,48f', 115 459,024. 1972 2,920,254 ,397 305,421 1973 1975** 3,175,883 120 356 ' 305,514 246,514 549,254 549,254 ' 5,411,100 203,339 293,993 905,501 905,01 YEAR INTERGOVERN- MENTAL REVENUE USE OF MONEY MISCELLANEOUS AND PROPERTY -REVENUE_ 1965*$ 1966 394,448 $ 44,437 $ 68,106 1967 507,191 508,491 X9,762 38,196 ' 1968 658,236 33,110 60,371 130,938 1969 668,271 43,894 38,447 1970 881,417 88,129 112,292 ' 1971 1,148,59845,056 45,056 1972 1972 1175,379 , 103,737 171,018 1973 1975** 1,388 749 3417076 121,089 209,746 330,637 , 295,970 505,977 ' * Audit reports before this date were prepared above breakdown unreliable for In such a manner as to makethe years prior to 1965. ' General Revenue for the purposes of this comparison includes the seven funds, Debt Service, Trust & Agency, Liquor functional i Profits, and Road Use Tax. ** Eighteen This month period ended June 30, 1975 page of information historic information in retained for in fiscal reference only, for I� ' presentation q�f year format as required by Home Rule Act, 1972, see gage 99, 103 ♦ 1 I ff I� FISCAL FINES & YEAR TTS_ 1974 1975 $2,779,538 1976 4,518,917 1974 4,193,843 CITY Or IOWA CITY GENERAL GOVERNMENTAL REVENUE BY SOURCE LICENSES & FINES & PERMITS ---___ FORFEITURES $123,482 $196,677 145,992 193,058 194,012 1974 237,714 FISCAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL RN2'flf1TAL REVENUE USE OF MONEY AND MISCELLANEOUS 1974 $1,442,082 PROPERTY REtIE 1975 1,907,798 $149,163 1976 1,304,663 144,929$160,053 99,901 173,424 103,523 104 CFL►RGES :tilt S- ERV- ICES $497,486 546,837 663,322 ■r M CITY OF IOUA CITY RPM! PROPERTY TAR LEVIES AND COLLECTION DELINQUENT TOTA:AJIS A LEVY COLLECTION TOTAL TAX CURRENT' TAX % OF LEVY TAX COLLECTED COLLECTIONS TOTAL TAR COLLECLIUNS Z_OF M LEVY YEAR YEAR LEVY COLLECTIONS $1,249,037 $1,248,570 100.0 $ 4NA45 $1x AU 150.0 .3 1964 1965 1965 1966 1,283,330 1,772,478 NA NA 99.3 6,577 1,,282,707 779,055 $9.7 19.2 1966 1967 1968 1,785,158 1,923,890 1,893,586 98.4 15,260 26,466 1, ,;908,846 26083,263 1967 1968 19692 098,717 2,056,797 2,376,617 98.0 9(•4 28,526 2405,143 !�8.5 1160.5 1969 1970 2,440,655 2,567,028 2,553,624 9!0.5 26,725 2;580,349 2,910,618' 1�f10.3 1970 1971 1971 1972 2,902,628 2,866,145 98.7 99.3 44,473 51,743 3,166,136 1)D1.0 1972 1973 3,134,947 3,114,393 5,378,747 9'x•1 15,576 5,3 94.323. ,�9.4 102.5 1973 1975* 5,427,059 4,091,176 4,153,463 101.5 40,380 4,183,843 1974 1976 ASSESSED AND ACTUAL VALUE OF TAXABLE PROPERTY R.R. UTILITY TOTAL ASSESSED ][ONEiS � Ti#Tb ACMIL LEVY COLLECTION REAL PERSONAL PROPERTY PROPERTY VALUATION S _ _,V1,_ YEAR YEAR PROPERTY $4,577,308 $2„789,353 $34,333„549 $18,891,69:4 T4� $,195 052,987 812;650 1964 1965 1966 $26,966,383 39,382,375 4,981,659 2,901,400 47,265,;434 50,954,972, 26,755,48131: 23,268,71„4;4 21 x'990 832 ' ' 1965 1966 1967 41,948,739 5,770,908 3,235,325 3,894,313 54,450,353 29,243,120 23D,911,094 1967 1968 45,159,712 51,893,371 5,394,323 5,959,15b 3,187,546 61,040073 64,394y145 36,079,63,x' 3.9,717,5531 27� ,153,976 214,386 . 1968 1969 1969 1970 54,369,594 6,282,563 7,379,237 3,741,988 4,098,711 68,664�855 3,97,7fi1� 2� ,:2 , 792,402 2,565,480 1970 1971 57,186,907 64,803,191 7,287,805 4,448,287 76,539,283 80,706,073 124 64.iC , I 2 9,036,021 1971 1972 1972 68,386,048 7,773,730 4,546,295 4,,855,441 84,513,,578 313 34532,169 ,066,396 1973 1915* 71,264,091 8,394,046 8,390,355 5,062,62,0 95,697;,819 91,1M. 95,8('4 29,08f 411:160,990'!""* 1975 82,244,844 379,504,175 30,946,885 20,680,850 431,131,910 withija eeuent rep��.,,� o£ 1976 FY77** - In 1971, the state government began taxing banks and supplying the taxing agencies for those inntitutions1'w & ?-xcii4 from Note the monies and credits tax. ***Projected The value of the monies and credits: figure - not certified 1 valuj 5= the actual value total. 30, 1975 **Assessed valuelchanged from 27% to lgp2:of acj * Eighteen month period ended June LEVY YEAR 1964 1965 1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973*** 1974 FY76**** COLLECTION YEAR 1965 1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 1975/76 1976/77 I.C. SCHOOL DISTRICT 65.256 54.663 66.803 42.208 47.503 56.956 57.219 51.839 74.931* 68.318 57.253 14.927 CITY OF IOWA CITY PROPERTY TAX RATES PER 1000 ASSESSED 'VALUATION BASIC CO. SCHOOL LEVY -0- -0- -0- 20.997 22.566 26.735 28.107 20.248 -0- -0- -0- -0- CITY OF IOWA CITY 35.542 26.489 34.391 34.464 33.604 37.377 37.012 37.590 38.07:3 42.304 42.751 10.951 1 *Basic School Levy combined by law in 1972 with School District Levy. **Includes mill levy for Joint County School Board not included elsewhere. ***Tax Levy of 12 months. ****Changed from mills to dollar/actual valuation amounts. 1976 is on a fiscal year basis. 106 RATRO OF JOHNSON CO. AREA 40114 CITY AND STATE SCHOOL TOTAL TO 'TOTAL 16.646 -0- 3.77.444 30.3 15-.196 -0- 516.328 27.5 15.199 1.486 13G7.879 29.2 16.492 1.500 3:315.663. 29.8 15.790 1.500 31'20.963 27.8 18.379 1.500 140.947 26.5 21.244 1.500 145.082 25.5 15.789 1.508 11W.849**' 28.7 17.732 1,508 1$6.116** 28.0 18.259 1,507 11)4.221**' 31.5 22.515 1.938 124;647**' 34.3 4.381 .483 :30.742 35.6 *Basic School Levy combined by law in 1972 with School District Levy. **Includes mill levy for Joint County School Board not included elsewhere. ***Tax Levy of 12 months. ****Changed from mills to dollar/actual valuation amounts. 1976 is on a fiscal year basis. 106 1 CITY OF IOWA CITY ' YEAR RECREATION& -- �_ PROPERTY TAX RECEIPT BY FUNCTION TRUST IGENERAL 1964 $ AGENCY L�y, YEAR GOVERNMENT' 99,570 111,975 PUBLIC $ 167,818 $ 117,192 $ 1964 --__ STREETS SAFETY SANITATION -.-_ MUNICIPAL ENTERP;RISE 1965 $ 31,255 $ 146,125 $ 259,275 235,353 -._' 1966 30,429 72,782 142,380 281,806 $ 165,715 229,579 $ 120,t ,i�59 '1967 1968 160,361 200,580 133,346 138,236 253,865 406 001 160,677 115„'j32 134,2119 _ 1969 177,289 7 547 505,240 212,054 212 102 178 ,1114 '1970 1971 197,098 8,147 2>797 547,135 638,610 254,582 159a,S39 221„397 1972 125,838 87 187,805 108,415 901,168 222,202 223,661 22,202 1973 760 219,991 882,784 208,692 214,286 198,16;66. 80,348 1975* 317,322 153 179 196,869 969,794 1,592„121 222,809 194,00 356,4110 87,035 * Eighteen ** Included month period ended in June 30, 1975 769,8116 357,Z1119 streets 1 I 107 ' YEAR RECREATION& -- �_ UTILITIES --.-_ SERVICE DEBT TRUST TORT 1964 $ AGENCY L�y, 1965 1966 99,570 111,975 $ 61,978 $ 167,818 $ 117,192 $ 1967 188,200 67 '373 158,256 155,586 115,383 1968 220,429 247,392 95,145 235,353 116,656 133,162 '1969 1970 418,772 117,754 74,875 201,944 192,741 ^� 1971 471,562 403,841 73,788 198,259 355,413 182,801 _ '1973 1972 454,785 41,194 80,265 353,625 388,360 185,997 207,358 33,8091 31,528 322,887 123,242 275,060 1975* 643,233 532,478 366,754 22,202 __ ** 865,363 581,502 80,348 ' 87,035 * Eighteen ** Included month period ended in June 30, 1975 streets This page of historic information is information retained for reference in program accounting format as required only, for presentation of by Home Rule Act, 1972 see page ' I 107 CITY OF IOWA CITY PROPERTY TAX RECEIPT BY PROGRAM FISCAL ADMINI- COZOFUNITY PUBLIC TRANS - YEAR STRATION DEVELOPMENT SAFETY PORTATION 1974 $130,043 $ 24,443 $ 837,875 $346,523, 1975 1976 100,299 208,814 1,335,161 216,272; 99,840 273,013 1,433,423 479: LEISURE & FISCAL ENVIRONMENTAL CULTURAL PENSION & DEBT YEAR PROTECTION OPPORTUNITIES RETIREMENT SERVICE 1974 $250,647 $416,543 $314,270 $459,196 1975 652,098 791,713 488,067 726,492 1976 458,386 744,005 730,452 444,246 108. CITY OF ImA CITY CU&MATION OF LEGAL DEBT MARGIN As of June 30, 1976 ASSESSED VALUATION 1001 of Actual Valuation Real Estate Personal Property Utilities TOTAL ASSESSED VALUATION Add: Monies 8 Credits at 100% TOTAL ACTUAL VALUATION DEBT LIMIT - 5% OF ACTUAL VALUATION AMOUNT OF DEBT APPLICABLE TO DEBT LIMIT Total General Bonded Debt $4,314,000 Other 4,005 000 Less: Special Assessment Bonds$ 61,000 RevenLe Bonds 3,944-000 $379,504,I75 30,946,885 20,680,850 $431,1_ $ 29,08,0 431,160 990 $ 8,319,000 $ 4,005,000 TOTAL AMOUNT OP DEBT APPLICABLE TO DEBT LIMIT LEGAL DEBT MARGIN *Projected Figure - Not Certified at this time 109 $21„558,050 $ 4,314,000 $17,'?_ 44,050 COMPUTATION OF DIRECT AND OVERLAPPING DEBT June 30, 1976 NET DEBT NAME OF GOVERNMENTAL UNIT OUTSTANDING City of Iowa City $ 4,314,000 Johnson County 785,000 Iowa City Comm. School Dist. 6,9.14,000 $12,013,000 *Per Capita Actual Value 8 APPLICABLE TO THIS IOWA CITY OVERNMENTAL UNIT SHARE OF DEBT 100.00% $ 4,314,000 49.17% 385,985 70.04% 4,842,566 $ 9,542,553; CITY OF IOWA CITY RATIO OF NET GENERAL BONDED DEBT TO ASSESSED VALUE AND NET BONDED DEBT PER CAPITA NET RATION OF NET, ASSESSED GROSS DEBT DUE BONDED BONDED DEBT TO I;RET BONDED, YEAR POPULATION VALUE BONDED DEBT AND UNPAID DEBT ASSESSED VALUE DEBT PER CAPITA 1964 33,443 34,333,549 7.,176,412 1,176,412 .0343 to 1 35.173' 1965 41,602 47,265,434 1,052,000 1,052,000 .0223 to 1 25.29, 1966 41,602 50,954.972 1,575,000 1,575,000 g309 to 1 37.8G 1967 41,602 54,450,353 1,398,000 1,398,000 .0257 to 1 33.60' 1968 41,602 61,040,073 3,238,000 3,238,000 Q530 to 1 77.83 1969 41,602 64,394,145 3,078,000 31078,000 Q478 to 1 73.9 1970 46,850 68,664,855 3,914,000 10,000 3,904,000 Q567 to 3 83.3J 1971 46,850 76,539,283 5,400,000 51000 5,395,000 .0705 to .1 115.15 1972 46,850 80,706,073 4,981,000 4,981,000 .0617 to 1 106.37 1973 46,850 84,513,578 5,142,000 5,142,000 .0608 to 1 109.75 1975 47,744 95,697,819 5,053,000 5,053,000 .0528 to 1 105.84' 1976 47,744 431,131,910 4,314,000 4,314,000 .0100 to 1 90.30 COMPUTATION OF DIRECT AND OVERLAPPING DEBT June 30, 1976 NET DEBT NAME OF GOVERNMENTAL UNIT OUTSTANDING City of Iowa City $ 4,314,000 Johnson County 785,000 Iowa City Comm. School Dist. 6,9.14,000 $12,013,000 *Per Capita Actual Value 8 APPLICABLE TO THIS IOWA CITY OVERNMENTAL UNIT SHARE OF DEBT 100.00% $ 4,314,000 49.17% 385,985 70.04% 4,842,566 $ 9,542,553; 110 i. RATIO TO CI11rF PER; CAPI7rA ACTUAL VALUR POP. 47,1440* -- , . 1 1.22.% $ 90.31 .098 1.9d, 1.128 99.93' 2.46% 1� _198.25 1 I J 1 I I I 1 1 I CITY OF IOWA CITY RATIO OF ANNUAL DEBT SERVICE EXPENDITURES FOR GENERAL BONDED DEBT TO TOTAL GENERAL EXPENDITURES YEAR PRINCIPAL INTEREST TOTAL DEBT SERVICE TOTi1L GENERAL EXPENDITURES RATIO OF DEBT SERvi[jrE TO,GENERAL EXPENDIIhJRES 1964 $144,000 $ 36,649 $ 180,649 $ 2,332,615 .077 to 1 1965 124,412 33,101 157,513 2,120,876 .074 to 1 1966 127,000 47,370 174,370 2,660,654 .066 to 1 , 1967 177,000 48,419 225,419 2,550,762 .088 to 1 1968 160,000 44,244 204,244 3,087,523 .066 to 1 1969 160,000 120,683 280,683 3,299,894 .085 to 1 1970 164,000 116,724 280,724 3,834,806 .073 to 1 1971 264,000 160,999 424,999 5,017,290 .085 to 1 1972 419,000 217,954 636,954 5,168,402 .123 to 1 1973 439,000 202,900 641,900 5,809,596 .110 to 1 1975* FY76** 489,000 739,000 321,538 203,482 810,538 942,482 10,430,585 7,801,892 .078 to 1 .121 to 1 General Expenditures are those made out of the General Fund, Debt Service and Pension 6 Retirement Fund, excluding revenue funds. * Eighteen months period ended June 30, 1975 ** Fiscal Year Period 111 CITY OF IOWA CITY SOPMMY OF BONDED INDEEOT DNESS PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1976 112 AMINP DATE ORIGINALLY OF OUTSTANDING OUTSTANDING INTEREST 'MEREST ISSUED ISSUE 7-1-75 REDEIMM ISSUED 6-30-76 :PAID UNPAID GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS: Bridge $ 400,000.00 12-01-59 $ 120,000.00 4i 20,000.Q0 $ --- $ 100,000.00 it 3,315.00 '$ 425.00 Bridge 75,000.00 11-01-61 28,000.00 4,000.0,0 --- 24000.00 789.00 85.00 Public Library 265,000.00 08-01-62 105,000.00 15,(,100.00 --- 90,000.00 3,168.7S. --- Park 4SO,000.00 02-01-66 100,000.00 100,1100.00 --- --' 1,700.00' --- Street Improvements 1,350,000.00 11-01-68 1,025,000.00 100,000.00 --- 925,000.00 39,377.50 --- Bridge 650,000.00 11-01-68 450,000.00 50,000.00 --- 400;000.00 16,800.x0, 400.00 Setter Construction 1,000,000.00 11-01-70 700,000.00 100,000.00 --- 600',000.00 30,550,'OO --- Park 200,000.00 10-01-71 200,000.00 50,000.00 --- 150;000.00 6,SSO.60 --- Bridge 500,000.00 10-01-71 500,000.00 --- --- 500;000.00 20,900.DD - Water Treatment Plant 900,000.00 12-01-71 825,000.00 50,000.00 --- 775't000.00 32,931.7,5, 318.75 Bridge 150,000.00 11-01-73 150,000.00 75,000.00 --- 751,000,00 6,150.00 --- Street 450,000.00 11-01-73 450,OQO.00 75,000.00 -- 375,000.00 18,450.9Q -- Street 400,000.00 08-01-74 400,000.00 100,000.00 -- 300;000.00 '22,800.00. - - TOTAL GQRAL OBLIGATIONS: B: $5,053,000.00 $739,000.00 $ -0- 4,314;000.00 x,$203,431.5 0, '$1,228.75 REVENUE BONDS: Nater Revenue $3,100,000.00 12-01-61 $1,984,000.00 $ 90,000.00 $ --- $1,894;000.00 $ 67,563.00 $7,573,50 Nater Revenue 1,000,000.00 06-01-67 695,000.00 40,000.00 --- 655,000.00 27,765.00: 1,135.00 Sewer Revenue 900,000.00 01-01-66 730,000.00 25,000.00 --- 7056,000.00 27,160.00 185.00 487.50 Sewer Revenue 850,000.00 04-01-6S 710,000.00 20,000_00 --- 90,000.00 23,287.50! TOTAL REVENUE BONDS, $4,119,000.00 5175;000.00 $ -0- $3,944,000.00 $145,775.511, $9.381.00 112 .. � .� � ■. � � � � ■� � � � : � � iii ' �,, i � CITY OF ICKA CITY Sl WRY OF BONGED INDEBTEDNESS PERIOD FLED .RUN 30, 1976 mom ORIGINALLY DATE OF OUTSTANDING aTTSTXNDING, INTEREST' 7�7732ESi' ISSUED ISSUE 7-1-75 REDEBID ISSUED 6-30-76 SPECIAL ASSESSfEYI' BONDS: Street Improvement $ 122,000.00 12-01-67 $ 15,000.00 $ 15,000.00 $ 750;00 '1 Street improvoment 95,000.00 115,000.00 12-01-69 05-01-70 33,000.00 11,000.00 52,000.00 13,000_00 --- - - 22,000.00 39,000.00 6SOj00il --- 2600:00.1 - - Street Improvement TOTAL SPECIAL ASSM94ENTS: $ 100,000.00 $ 39,000.00 $ -0- $ 61.000.00 11 . SJ000.1611 $ -0- IWAL G.O., REYEWE 4 ASSFSSffh'[ BONDS $ 9,272,000.00 $ 953,000.00 $ -0- $8,319,000.00 1j 3S4j2S7,6& $10,609.75 INDUSTRIAL REVENUE BONDS $4,375,000.00 05-01-69 $ 3,645,000.00 $ 17S,000.00 $ --- $3,470,000.00, it 171:95kJS:: S --- *URBAN RENEWAL BJH $4,620,000.00 $ 4,939,000.00 $13,965.924.28 $13,499,109.28 $4,472,185.00 4664.SS9J4,' T'OT'AL ALL IADEB[FDNJESS $17,856,000.00 515093,924.28 $13,499,109.28 $16.261,185.00 1�,042'r772GS9! $10,609.75 *Urban Renewal Bonds are issued for one year maturities and are payable from proceeds of Federal Capital Grants and disposition of land sales. 113 Year Ended 6/30 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 ).991 1992 1993 1.994 1995 General Obligation 941,085.75 932,991.25 947,982.25 661,708.75 637,222.75 342,961.75 212,775.00 106,375.00 102,125.00 $4,885,227.50 CITY OF IOWA CITY', IOWA SUMMARY OF BONDED INDEBTEDNESS DEBT SERVICE REQUIREMENTS TO MATURITY June 30, 1976 Special Revenue * Assessment 334,907.00 27,050.00 332,704.50 25,850.00 330,242.00 13,650.00 337,494.50 _ 339,277.00 _ 335,684.50 _ 327,092.00 _ 325,299.00 _ 294,871.00 _ 296,618.50 _ 209,866.00 _ 319,288.00 _ 263,280.00 289,510.00 _ 339,460.00 283,807.50 _ 146,460.00 107,150.00 - 103,575.00 _ $5,316,586.50 $ 66,550.00 Subtotal 1,303,042.75 1,291,545.75 1,291,874.25 999,203,25 976,499,75 678,646.25 539,867,00 431,674.00 396,996.00 296,618.50 209,866.00 319,288.00 263,280,00 289,510.00 339,460.00 283,807,50 146,460.00 107,150,00 103,575,00 $10,268,364.00 *Please see page 117 for information regarding the redemption of bonds prior to maturity. 114 Industrial Develop menit *' 397,,31.R5 396, 925., 00 395,956.,::5 398, 912.,':0 395,987..$0 397,187, 110 396, 875:;00 400,625.:00 398,125;;Ql0 394,687,41 0 395,312.,$;0 394,687;50. 387,812:$b $5,150,425,06 Total 1,700,374_b0 1,688,470.:15 ,1,687,830.4o j1,398,115.-,�5 11,372,487-<5 075,833.75 936,742_00 832,299.910 795,121.00 691,306,(:0 605,178.,50 713,975.50 651,092.50 289,510.00 339,460.00 283,8A7.5b 146,460.00 107,150.,00 103,575.00 $115, 418,789.OiD Year Ended 6/30 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1973 1984 1985 1986 1987 19EIB 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 General Obligation 769,000.00 794,000.00 844,000.00 594,000.00 594,000.00 319,000.00 200,000.00 100,000.00 100,000.00 $.4,314,000.00 Revenue * 190,000.00 195,000.00 200,000.00 215,000.00 225,000.00 230,000.00 230,000.00 237,000.00 215,000.00 225,000.00 145,000.00 262,000.00 215,000.00 250,000.00 310,000,00 265,000.00 135,000.00 100,000.00 100,000.00 $3,944,000.:)O CITY OF IOWA CITY, IOWA SUMMARY OF BONDED INDEBTEDNESS BOND FACE VALUE June 30, 1976 Special Assessment 24,000.00 24,000.00 13,000.00 61,000.00 Subtotal 983,000.00 1,013,000.00 1,057,000.00 809,000.00 819,000.00 549,000.00 430,000.00 337,000.00 315,000.00 225,000.00 145,000.00 262,000.00 215,000.00 250,000.00 310,000.00 265,000.00 135,000.00 100,000.00 100,000.00 $8:319_ ,000.00 M' M !� owl Industrial Development:k 185,000.00 195,000.00 205,000.00 220,000.00 230, 000. 00 245,000.0(1 2f0,000.00! 280,000.001 2515 f 000.001 310,000.001 330,000.00 350,000.00 365,000.00 $ 3,470000, O0 * Please see page 117 for information regarding the redemption of bonds prior to maturity, 115 slbtal I,1`68,000.,OOI li1208, 000.OD1 1262,000.001 11029,000.00 14049,000.001 1794,000.00 I690,000.00: 617,000.00' 610,000.00' 535,000.00 475, o00.00 1612,000.00 1580,000.00 .250, 00Q.00 :10,000.00 :265,000.00 135,000.UO ](00,000.00 ]LOO.000.00 $ l.1,. T89. o00. 00 116 s 32.3'14.00 480,470.75 425,830..50 7.69,115'.75 A23,487.25 1281,833.75 1246,742.00 ;215,299.00 �1C85,121.00 156,306.00 130,178.50 101:979.50; 71,092.50; 39,510.00 29,460.00' 18,807.50; j 11.460.00, 7,150.00,_ 3,575.00. CITY OF IOWA CITY, IOWA SUMMARY OF FONDED INDEBTEDNESS COUPON VALUE June 30, 1976 Year Special Industrial Ended General * Assessment * Subtotal Development t 6/30 Obligation Revenue 1977 172,085.75 144,907.00 3,050.00 320,042.75 278,545.75 212,331_25 201,925.00 1978 138,991.25 137,704.50 1,650.00 650 234,874.25 19(1,956.25 1979 103,982.25 130,242.00 .00 190,203.25 178,912.50 1980 67,708.75 122,494.50 - 157,499.75 165,987.50 1981 43,222.75 114,277.00 129,646.25 152,187.50 1982 23,961.75 105,684.50 109,867.00 136,875.00 1983 12,775.00 97,092.00 94,674.00 120,625.00 1984 6,375.00 88,299.00 _ 81,996.00 103,125.00 1985 2,125.00 79,871.00_ 71,618.50 84,687.50 1986 - 71,618.50 - 64,866.00 6,5,312.50 1987 - 64,866.00 57,288.0044,687.50 1988 - 57,286.00 48,280.00 22,812.50 1989 - 48,280.00_ 39,510.00 - 1990 - 39,510.00 29,460.00 - 1991 - 29,460.00 _ 19,807.50 - 1992 - 18,607.50 _ 11,460.00 - 1993 - 11,460.00 _ 7,150.00 - 1994 - 7,150.00 3,575.00 _ 1995 - 3,575.00 - $1,372,586.50 $ 5,550.00 $1,,949,364.00 S1,680,425.0[! $ 571,227.50 * Please see page 112 for information regarding the redemption of bonds prior to maturity. 116 s 32.3'14.00 480,470.75 425,830..50 7.69,115'.75 A23,487.25 1281,833.75 1246,742.00 ;215,299.00 �1C85,121.00 156,306.00 130,178.50 101:979.50; 71,092.50; 39,510.00 29,460.00' 18,807.50; j 11.460.00, 7,150.00,_ 3,575.00. CITY OF IOWA CITY, IOWA ' SUMARY OF BONDED INDEBTEDNESS June 30, 1976 Provisions relating to the redemption of bond issues prior to maturity: ' General Obligation Bonds now outstanding are not redeemable prior to maturity,, WATER REVENUE BONDS - DECEMBER 1, 1961 ISSUE: ' Bonds due 12-01-76 through 12-01-91 totaling $1,894,000.00 are redeemabla after 12-01-71 from revenue only, in whole or in part, in the inverse. order of their maturity. ' Bonds due 12-01-82 through 12-01-91 totaling $1,204,000.QO are redeemable as a whole after 12-01-81 from any fiords. ' WATER REVENUE BONDS - JUNE 1, 1976 ISSUE: ' Bonds due 12-01-76 through 12-01-81 totaling $240,000.00 are not redeemable prior to maturity. ' Bonds due 12-01-82 through 12-01-92 totaling $415,000.00 are redeemable, in whole or in part, from any funds on any date on or after 12-01-81, at part and accrued interest. SEWER REVENUE BONDS - APRIL 1, 1976 and JANUARY 1, 1966 ISSUES: Bonds due 01-01-77 through 01-01-95 totaling $1,395,000.QO are redeemable ' on any interest paying date on or after 01-01-75 from revenues onuy, in whole or in part, in the inverse order of their maturity and within a maturity by lot, at part and accrued interest. ' Bonds due 01-01-81 through 01-01-95 are also redeemable, in whole or in part, from any funds on any date on or after 01-01-80, at par and accrued interest. ' SPECIAL ASSESS ENT BONDS: ' All bonds are redeemable at any time, payable only out of Special Assess- ments Funds. 1 INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT REVENUE BONDS: Bonds are redeemable as a whole at any time in inverse order of maturity. Also, in the event of the condemnation of the property or the lessee's ' option of his option to purchase the property, the bonds within each maturity may be redeemed by lot in such manner as may be designated: by the trustee. 117 - ' CITY OF IOWA CITY SCHEDULE OF REVENUE );OND COVERAGE I PARKING REVENUE 1 NET REVENUE DEBT SERVICE REQUIREMENTS � ' GROSS AVAILABLE FOR YEAR REVENUE EXPENSE DEBT SERVICE PRINCIPAL INTEREST TOTAL COVERAGE 1965 $228,392 $ 78,794 $149,598 ' 1966 241,778 99,692 $ 20,000 $ 9,610 $ 29,610 ;?,1 1967 242,987 132,531 110,456 50.000 8,525 58,525 ;i,4 ' 1968 277,061 78,359 50'000 6,971 56,975 �� g. 1969 290,735 126,578 164,157 50,000 5,425 55,425 1970 302,753 149,204 50,000 3,875, 53,,875 1''6 1971 287,558 161,215 153 549 16,462, 81,462 �,g' 1972 270,733 100,204 170,529 105 000 > 17,513 122,513 1;.0 1973 272,333 73,334 198,999 230,000 11,375 241,375 1975* 425,827 104,170 321,657 _--- "- -_ 7, ' 1976 320,493 55,093 265,400 -_- ' SEWER REVENUE 1965 318,618 99,952 218,666 ' 1966 326,814 126,103 197,711 ___ 7'267 7,67 -r 1967 355,609 133,467 222,142 46,150 46,150 --� 1968 364,540 130,680 233,860 25,000 62,253 87,253 2„5 1969 390,183 181,655 208,528 25,000 61,734 86,734 2.:7 1970 405,928 203,716 202,212 35,000 60,890 90,890 2;g 1971 508,815 227,722 281,093 35,000 59,077 94,077 2,; 1972 490,494 233,473 257,021 35,000 57,878 92,878 3:. ID 1973 495,713 245,036 250,G77 40,000 55,723 95,723' 2.. 1975* 785,097 338,278 40'000 54,408 94,408,2. a( 1976 672,893 248'405 80,000 78 960 424,488 45,800 49,960 158,960 2.J1 94,960 4,1t ' WATER REVENUE 1965 513,677 293,436 220,421 1966 664,897 299,452 365,445 40,000 117,201 157,201 1.4. 1967 757,583 330,849 426,734 +5,000 116,585 161,585 2,5' 1968 805,208 324,304 480,904 'i0,000 132,559 182,559' 2.,1 1969 847,480 396,457 451,023 80,000 150x640 230,640 2.j! ' 1970 883,005 410,993 472,012 85,000 150,815 235,815 1.3 1971 965,406 453,702. 511,704 90'000 146,276 236,276 2.Q 1972 932,104 449,801 482,303 95,000 137,588 232,588, 2, 2! ' 1973 872,590 549,152 120,000 117;027 237,027 2.0 1975*1,472,302 853,170 566,432 105,000 124,446 229,446 1,4,' 1976 1,190,176 546,171 644,005 125,005 166,927 291;927 1.g 130,000 101,072 231,072 2.8 ' * Eighteen month period ended June 30, 1975 �I 118 I. MONTH January February March April May June July August September October November December 1970 $233,604.41 315,572.16 309,425.90 420,627.09 320,165.63 460,028.04 370,146.82 300,752.36 497,504.63 349,538.15 292,390.83 72,619.15 CITY OF IOWA CITY, IOWA AVERAGE DAILY CASH BALANCE 1971 $ 73,702.18 28,707.54 35,270,19 57,223,20 82,344.88 61,496.29 (11,184.86) 908.11 56,954,64 (30,733.79) 22,517.17 (37,699.04) 1972 $(40,511.36) 12,424,38 (7,134.16) (13,674.26) (12,01x,68) 27,503.34 22,301.88 91,728.15 54,599.53 35,355.53 18,019.80 45,524.20 1973 $ 13,044,46 (9,822..75) (19,378.29) 14,159.37 (20,223.26) (3,690.53) 1,583.91 892.93 (8,985.94) 32,079.45 35,,899.89 (4,793.94) Year $327,660.67 $ 28,055.86 $ 19,510.36 $ 2,563,78 RETURN ON AVAILABLE CASH MONTH January February March April May June July August September October November December Average Interest Earned Rate of Return 1970 $4,903,241.35 4,796,647.94 4,421,468.51 4,987,540.17 4,749,246.03 4,877,$32.52 4,809,043.49 4,607,464.26 4,441,634.33 4,759,520.97 4,873,143.15 4,468,768.27 1971 $4,336,634.77 4,145,862.29 4,238,045.21 4,480,607.01 4,761,885.22 4,835,752.71 4,490,986.64 3,967,494.62 3,289,313.27 4,702,791.69 4,492,886.52 3,966,100.45 1972 $4,411,851.98 4,548,799.54 4,561,286,28 4,630,771.55 4,720,191.42 4,827,775.01 4,521,332.02 4,287,591.63 3,859,529.79 3,872,050..25 3,930,076.03 3,693,386.08 1974 $ 14,219.16 (11,124,15) 27,478,78 (15,567,69) (3,033.87) 1,829.12. 9,657,,99 (17,078.40) 23,375.79 17,906.05 (36,728'.22) (7,309.75) 1973' 1974' 03,448,107.50 $3,335,169,37 3,316,608.68 3,078,611,,,00 3,110,851.26 2x868;432,08 3,308,500.35 2,892,257,49 3,5.47,746.68 2,668,545.05 3,960,251.20 2,,993,126,37 4,188,644.49 3,720,172.44 3,361,455.56 3,750,073.43 3,050,465.01 3,546,,121,.00 3,311,456.23 3,325095.25 3,076,612.14 3,72,7„8,64:92 3,512,496.98 3,245,150.98 4,716,295.92 4,309,100.45 4,322,053.47 3,432,766.34 320,872.59 6.80% 229,146.97 5.31% 208,079.75 4.81% 119 221,922,07 6.467, 1975 $(2,¢73,.98 (G, 493 Al) 121;d;8� (61 544,4;Y.) 5,047.;48) 4,130.',11,' 1(21,74.. 1(16, 965..731 12,304. 0 . 183,504,7771 J�14; 866.5?) 1115;252;52) $I(6a 327. ✓$9)t 1915 $2, 461,635.9& 2,762, 066_50. 2,7$10,38.7'4 3,4213 084_.1.6 3,7110,761.21 3,3$12,35&.03 3, 2;5;3, 984.06. 315!9,559470 it 11,36;G, I July August September October November December January 'February March April May ' June YEAR $ 1 ' July August September October November December January February March April May June PY 72 $ (11,184.86) 908.11 56, 9541, 64 (30,733,79) 22,417.17 (37,699.04) (40,511.36) 12,424.38 (7,134,16) (13,674,26) (12,012.68) 27,503.34 (2,720.20) $ FY 72 $4,490,986.641 3,967,494.62 3,283,313.27 4,702,791.69 4,492,886.52 3,966,100.45 4,411,851.98 4,548,799,54 4,561,286.28 4,630,771,55 4,720,191.42 4,827,775,01 AVERAGE YEAR $4,384,187.42 ' INTEREST EARNED RATE OF RETURN 11 CITY OF IOWA CITY AVERAGE DAILY CASH BALANCE -- FY 73 _ $ 22,301.88 91,728.15 54,599.53 35,355.53 18,019.80 45,524.20 13,044.46 (9,822.75) (19,378.29) 14,159,37 (20,223.26) (3,690.53) 20,134.84 $ F- Y 74 1,583.91 892.93 (8,985.94) 32,079.45 35,899.89 (4,793.94) 14,219,16 (11,124.15) 27,478.78 (15,567.69) (3,033.87) 1,829.12 5,873.13 $ RETURN ON AVAILABLE CASH FY 73 $4,521,332.02 4,287,591.63 3,859,529.79 3,872,050.25 3,930,076.03 3,693,386.08 3,448,107.50 3,316,608.68 3,110,851,26 3,308,500.35 3,547,746.68 3,960,251,21 $3,738,002.62 120 _— —Y 74 $4,188,644.49 3,361,455.56 3,050,465.01 3,311.456,23 3,076,612.14 3,512,496.98 3,335,169.3.7 3,07'8,611.00 2,868,432.08 2,892 ' 257.49 2,668,54.5 05 2,99:3,126:37 7 $3,194,772,64 FY 75 $ 9,637.99 (17,078.44) 23,375.79 17,906.05: (36 728,22) (7,309.75) (2,073.98) (6,693,01),, 121.48 (6,544.39) 5,047,48 4{130,11 (1„350,73) $ FY 75 $3,720,172.44 3,750,073,43 3,546,121.00 3,825,895,25 3,727,864.92 3,245,150.98 2,861,635.98 2,762,06,6.50 2,790,387.74 3,423,081,16 3,730,761.21 3,352,358,03 $3,394,630,97 EX_6� $ 723„78) (�tt 98Si,73 12I,394�99 (11, 508,77),'' (L4:SF6.;52)i Q ii 565.48) (311,802.21j) 1W.P77.61 46',i24Q, 95 $,1720 jo (4086, 6,7) $2,916, 2,752, 2,356, 2,269,, 2,213f, 2,467,( 2,696,E 2,499;1 2,453,7 3,111,8 3,460 ,8, 3,302,1! 1.46 83 ,34 .47 30 .11 77 32 08 $2,626,737k5 $ 144,156.42, ' CITY OP IOWA CIT( URBAN RENEWAL R-14 PROJECT COSTS TO DATE II I 1 TOTAL IN CMIATIVE LATEST APPROVED COSstS INCURRED BUDGET THROUGH 6/80/76 TOTAL SURVEY 8 PL4MVING EXPENDITURES $ 308,299 $ 308,299 PROJECT EXECUTION EXPENNDITURES: tAdministrative Costs 41.8,745 438,369 Legal Services 55,575 60,$69 Survey and Planning Real 20,000 15,630 t Estate Acquisition Expenses 125,550 134,619 Operation of Acquired Property: Profit (-) or Loss (+) 232,052 (11,185) Site Clearance: ' Proceeds (-) or Cost (+) 442,079 418,3.07 Project Improvements 256,545 101,221 Disposal, Lease, Retention Costs 28,095 27,.134 ' Interest 945,000 1,070?560 Other Income (-) (366,731) (411,312) Contingencies 8,067 Real Estate Purchases 9,104,951 9,132rQ46 Project Inspection 101,697 101,697 TOTAL PROJECT EXPENDITURES (Item 1 of Gross Project Cost) $11,679,924 $11,386,.254 ' RELOCATION PAYMENTS 877,286 798,869 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $12,557,210 $12,185,1123 NOTE: These statements are presented on an accrual basis in the interest of ' complete disclosure of pertinent information. II I 1 CITY OF IOWA CITY URBAN RENEWAL R-14 - IRCLIECT BALANCE SHEET As of June. 30, 1976 ASSETS LLABILITIES 8 CAPITAL CA9I: LIABILITIES Project Expenditures Account $ 9,622.47 - Project Temporary Loan ACCWN7'S DLIE: Repayment Fund .29 Accounts Payable S 26,335.06 Deposits Held 243.44 Trust $ Deposit Liabilities 243.44 TOTAL Obi $ 9,866.20 TOTAL ACCOUNTS DUE ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE: NOTES PAYABLE: Relocation Grants Due from Banker's TYust Co. $4"472,000.00 Federal Government $ (851.67) TOTAL N'01ES PAYABLE Tenants 10,988.63 Other 4.50 INTIREST PAYABLE; TOTAL ACCOUITS RECEIVABLE $ 10,141.46 Banker's IYust Co. $ 8,144.01 TOTAL INTEREST PAYABLE INVESTMEM $ 189,753.08 TOTAL LIABILITIES PROJECT COSTS: Project Cost Control $11,386,254.92 CAPITAL Less: Value of Land Sold, -- Leased, Retained (533,720.00) LOCAL GRAMS -IN -AID: Net Project Costs 510,852,534.92 Crash $ 43,316.15 Non -Cash Local Grants in Aid 2,825,225.00 Non -Cash 2,82S,225.0O TOTAL PRWECT COSTS $13,677,759.92 TOTAL GRANTS-IN-AID 52,868,41.15 z7 $ 21§,578.50 $ 4j47,4000-00 i_ S_ 16,144.01 $ 4,§04,222.51 RELOCATION PAYMENTS $ 798,870.33 FEDIRAL CAPITAL GRANTS: Project Capital Grant $64512,257,QQ Relocation Grant 798,870.33 MAL CAPITAL GRANTS S7 311 1127.33 TOTAL CAPITAL 510,171Ar,668_48 TOTAL ASSETS $14,686,390.99 TOTAL LIABILITIES 4 CAPITAL 514;6816,390.99 122 123 ' CITY OF IOWA CITY LOW RENT HOUSING PROGRAM ' SECTION 23 - LA 22-1 OPERATING RECEIPTS $ MTENDITURES ' June 30, 1976 OPERATING RECEIPTS: BUDGET IMAL Dwelling Rental $ 99,870 ' Interest on Investments $ 112,586 Miscellaneous Income 2,130 5,086 TOTAL OPERATING RECEIPTS 102,000 5S OPERATING E(PENSE: Administration: Salaries $ 20,180 Legal Expense $ 20,126 Travel 800 590 Accounting $ Auditing Fees 960 363 ' Sundry 2,100 2,084 TOTAL ADMINISTRATION EXPENSE3 040 T-2 7 0$0_ 1 383 2$ 819 Utilities: Water `"-t Electricity $ 197 Gas 3' Other .-_ 7 TOTAL UTILITIES EXPENSE --- - T --:::2F7 Ordinary Maintenance P, Operation: Labor Materials $ 200 $ 76. t Contracts Costs 700 893 TOTAL ORDINARY MAINT. & OPER.1,000 $ 554 1900— 1,523 General Expense: Insurance $ 1,700 Employee Benefit Contributions 4,050 $ 1,149 Collection Losses 3,147 TOTAL GENERAL EXPENSE400 6,150 103 4,399 Rent for Leased Dwellings: ' Rent to Owners of Leased Dwellings $ 308,740 $ 303,774 TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSE $ 344,270 $ 334,722 ' OPERATING DEFICIT $ 242 270 � ) $ 216 995 ' Note: These statements are presented on an accrual basis in the complete disclosure of information. interest of pertinent are for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1976. Budget amounts and actual expenditures, The ' Department of Housing $ Urban Development provides the net costs of the Program - Operating Deficit., 123 MAMW CASH: General Fund Security Deposit Fund TOTAL CASH CITY OF IOWA CITY LOW RENT HOUSING PROGRAM SECTION 23 - IA 22-1 As of June 30, 1976 LIABILITIES ACCOUNTS PAYABLE: $ 8,719.09 Tenants' Security Deposits $ 7,275,04 (3,298. 16) Residual Receipts HUD 51,85q.82; $ 5,420.93 Other I1,093.89 TOTAL ACCOUNTS PAYABLE r $ 70„219.177 ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE: Tenants $ .30 Other 13.50 TOTAL ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE $ 13.80 INVES AFMS: Investments - General Fund $45,381.87 Savings Account - Security Dep. 10,623.22 TOTAL RiVESIMWrS $56,005.09 DEFERRED CHARGES: Prepaid Rent TOTAL DEFERRED CHARGES $21,291.00 $,21,291.00 LAND, STRUCTURES, $ EQUIPMENT: Equipment $ 3,254.75 TOTAL LAND, STRUCTURES, $ EQUIPMENT TOTAL ASSETS $ 3,254.75 $85,985.57 DEFERRED CREDITS: Tenants' Prepaid Rent $, 1,076.00 TOTAL DEFERRED'ICREDITS $: 1,076.00 TOTAL LIABILITIES $1 71,295;17 - Unreserved Surplus Operating Reserve -Leased Projects Total Surplus from Operations Cumulative Annual Contributions TOTAL SURPLUS SURPLUS II 595.00; TOTAL LIABILITIES $ SURPLUS 1:,4 $ 11?L01,624.59 �I 14,60;,80 j 85,98157 1 CITY OF IOWA CITY LOW RENT HOUSING PROGRAM ' SECTION 8 - KC -9033E OPERATING RECEIPTS ADD EXPENDITURES June 30, 1976 SET ACTUAL OPERATING RECEIPTS: $ --- Interest on Investments $ 82 1 TOTAL OPERATING RECEIPTS $ -0- —82 OPERATING EXPENSE: Administration: 1 Salaries Legal Expense $ 56,501 $ 13,798 Office Rental 1,950 195 ' Travel Accounting $ Auditing Fees 1,350-- Sundry 3'560 -210 Administrative Fee TOTAL 5„800 34,.286 828 1 ADMINISTRATION EXPENSE 105,147 15,031 ORDINARY MAINTENANCE & OPERATION: 1 Labor $ Materials TOTAL ORDINARY MAINT. $ OPERATION $ 2 1S0 x,150 $ 138 T--,138 GENERAL EXPENSE: 1 Insurance Employee Benefit Contributions $ 2,800 292 $ 8 1 TOTAL GENERAL EXPENSE 12 2.;275 OFFICE EQUIPMENT $ 2,050 $ 1„194 RENT FOR LEASED DWELLINGS: 1 Rent to Owners of Leased Dwellings $ 257,939 $ 11,612 1 TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSE $ 379„378 $ 30,263 OPERATING DEFICIT $ 379 378) $ 30 181 1 Note: These statements are presented 1 disclosurepertinent on an accrual basis in the int$rest of 1 January r 1, 1976, budgetamountsare are an 18 month Perormation. As this iodram dinggan Junep,30, 1977. Actual amounts reflect costs incurred Housing $ Urban Development provides the through June 30, 1976. The Department of i net costs of the Program - Operating Deficilt,i 1 ' CITY OF IOWA CITY LOW REM' HOUSING PROGRAM ' SECTION 8 - OPERATING RECEIPTS ICC -9033B AND EXPENDITURES June 30, 1976 ' BUDGET ACTUAL OPERATING RECEIPTS: $ --- $ 82 Interest on Investments TOTAL OPERATING RECEIPTS $ -0- 82 OPERATING EXPENSE: Administration: Salaries $ 56,501 $ 13,798 Legal Expense 1,950 195 Office Rental 1,350 --- Travel 1,560 210 Accounting $ Auditing Fees 3,700 -- Sundry 5,800 828 Administrative Fee 34„286 --- tTOTAL ADMINISTRATION EXPENSE $ 105,147 15,031 ORDINARY MAINTENANCE F, OPERATION: ' Labor & Materials$ 7, 150 $ 138 TOTAL ORDINARY MAINT. $ OPERATION-�G 138 ' GENERAL EXPENSE: Insurance $ 2,800 $ 8 Employee Benefit Contributions 9 292 2 275 TOTAL GENERAL EXPENSE $tel,( 2, 3 OFFICE EQUIPMENT $ 21050 $ 11199 RENT FOR LEASED DWELLINGS: ' Rent to Owners of Leased Dwellings $ 257,939 $ 11,612 ' TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSE $ 379,378 $ 30,263 OPERATING DEFICIT $ L379 t 378 $ 00 181 Note: These statements are presented on an accrual basis in the interest of complete disclosure of pertinent information. As this program began operation ' January 1, 1976, budget amounts are for an 18 month period ending June 30, 1977. Actual amounts reflect costs incurred through June 30, 1976. The Department of Housing $ Urban Development provides the net costs of the Program - Operating Deficit; ASSETS CASH: General Fund TOTAL CASH INVESTMENTS: DEFERRED CHARGES - PREPAID RENT: EQUIPMENNT: TOTAL ASSETS. CITY 0E IOWA CITY LOW RENT HOUSING PROGRAM SECTION 8 - KC 9033E As of Jame 30, 1976 $ 1,785.55 $ 1,785.55 $25,082.10 $ 4,295.00 $ 1,198.69 $32,361.34 LIABILITIES ACCOUNTS PAYABLE: DEFERRED CREDITS - PREPAID ANNUAL CONTRIBUTIONS: TOTAL LIABILITIES: SURPLUS UNRESERVED SURPLUS: TOTA LIABILITIES $ SURPLUS 126. $ 7;166.54 $ 513'177.00 $ 61,343.54 �8y9Sr 2.20) $ X21.361.34 _— P==== Cm OF IOVIA CITY SaMH.E OF INSURANCE IN FORCE 127 I POLICY PERIOD AN'NT.AL POLICY NIBOIER FROM TO MAILS OF' COVERAGE, LIABILITY LIMIT'S PPMMI � LIABILITY own 'emper GLA -4.54-65 05/21/76 05/21/77 General Liability -Automobile IOOISQQIIOQ j13,164,1jtj Hawkeye Security FSP 2-50-62-78 01/02/75 01/02/78 Cxmmercial Excess Liability 1,000„000 Aetna Life r, Casualty 20-XN-26-WCA 01/01/75 01/01/78 Excess Overlay Indemnity 4,0011„000 .4,000,iN1 Northwest National CA -60-33-16 10/27/75 10/27/76 hxblic Transportation Liability 100/3.Boll00 58,04500 PROPERTY iowa Kemper 83-37-73 01/01/76 01/01/79 City Wildings 14,930„000 16,p21. Hawkeye Security FE -49847 01/12/75 01/12/78 Transit System Building 130,OOQ bus '1,022,bb 2,688;W Hawkeye Security HC7-74-42-71A 01/06/76 01/06/77 Transit System Buses 32,OOQ per 1TIr FE -55058 04/19/76 04/19/79 Tt•mporury Relocation Mall 183,000 2,74s.D0 BOILERS Dartford DIN -8322815-00 03/19/76 03/19/77 Boilers 1,000,000 988:00 BONDI,% general FID -10544 07/16/7$ 07/16/78 Tniployee Blanket Bond 2,500 S94.915 U. S. Fidelity 20-0170-120-75 Indefinite City Manager 5,000 20.04 10:03 U. S. Fidelity 20-0170-34-74 01/01/76 01/01/78 City Attorney Soo U. S. Fidelity 20-0170-624-70 01/01/76 01/01/78 City Clerk 'treasurer 1,000 lO:OD 72:0D Transamerica 5620-09-48 Indefinite City 10,000 U. S. Fidelity 20-0170-30-76 01/02/76 01/02/78 W.yor 'rem Soo $00 10.0!0 1 10;65 1 U. S. Fidelity 20-0170-31-76 01/02/76 01/02/78 Wyor Pro U. S. Fidelity 20 -170 -XXX -XX Varied Airport Commissioners (3) 1,000 9.00 Transamerica 5620 -XX -XX Varied Airport Commissioners (2) 1,000 9,00 PERSONNEL SERVICES ManuManu ante Gr-SS4S 01/01/76 01/01/77 Group Life 35.000 11,870,00 Iowa National Mutual WC -30-418-398 01/01/76 01/01/77 Worker's Compensation N/A A6,892,OD*l Hospital Service 2521 12/01/75 11/30/76 Gioup Medical SO,OOD per illness) 221;084,06!1 "Estimated 127 I iCITY OF IOWA CITY MISCELLANEOUS STATISTICAL DATA i Date of Incorporation April 6, 1853 iForm of Government Manager -Council iArea 13,864 Acres Building Permits - Fiscal Year 1976: Permits Issued 695 Estimated Cost $22,536,449 Fire Protection: Number of Stations 3 Number of Employees 51 Police Protection: i Number of Stations 1 Number of Employees 54 iLocal Median Home Value - 1970 $22,800 State Median Home Value - 1970 $13,900 iRecreation: Number of Parks 26 Mini Parks 2 i Number of Acres 480 Number of Swimming Pools 3 iCemeteries - Number I Employees as of June 30, 1976 376 permanent i286 part-time Population: 1900 7,987 i 1910 10,091 1920 11,267 i 1930 1940 15,340 17,182 1950 27,212 1960 33,443 i 1970 46,850 1974 Special Census 47,744 1 1 i 128 CITY OF IOWA CITY MISCELLANEOUS STATISTICAL DATA Major Employers - Number of Employees: University of Iowa Veterans Hospital Mercy Hospital Iowa City Community School District Westinghouse Learning Corporation Sheller Globe Manufacturing Owens Brush Company American College Testing Program Moore Business Forms Procter $ Gamble Elections: Last General Election - 1972 Registered Voters Number of Votes Case Percentage Voting Last Municipal Election - 1975 Registered Voters Number of Votes Cast Percentage Voting 129 17,548 780 695 750 539 520 470 325 270 240 27,594 25,3'50 91,.9% 31,S85 8,471 26.8% in :14 9117: .y VA �' Frr, �•(Vs, • ,AIS � ! 1p �� - y ►� _ its low • A, Call to Order 0 Tentative Agenda Planning and Zoning Commission Iowa City, Iowa October 4, 1976 -- 7:30 p.m• City Manager's Conference Room B. Roll Call C. Consideration of minutes of meeting held on September 16, 1976 D. Zoning Item: Z-7614. Application submitted by Mr. and Mrs. Will J. Hayek C. Peter Hayek, Attorney, for rezoning a tract of land, R2 to R3, located north of Brown Street and east of Dodge Street and adjoining Happy Hollow Playground. Date filed: 8/26/76. 45 -day limitation: 10/10/76. Referred to Parks and Recreation Commission. E. Subdivision Item: 5-7632, Preliminary Auditor's Plat 032, located between Industrial Road and Scott Boulevard south of CRISP RR ROW. Submitted by the following owners: R. M. Boggs Co., Inc. Business Development Inc. Capitol Propane Gas Co., Inc. Drug Fair L. L. Pelling Co. Wolf Construction Inc. William Sueppel, Attorney. Date filed: 9/13/76. 45 -day limitation: 10/28/76. F. Discussion Items: 1. Consideration of revised by-laws of the Planning and Zoning Commission. 2. P-7317. Consideration of a proposed ordinance amending the Zoning Code to establish a University Zone (U). G. Other Business H. Adjournment Regular meeting -- October 7, 1976 STAFF REPORT Planning and Zoning Commiss$oa SUBJECT: October 7, 1976 S-7632. Prelirrainary Auditor's Plat No. 32 -- located', between Industrial Park Road and Scott Boulevard and south of the. CRI4P) RR ROW. Date filed. 9113/76., ,4S - STAFF day limitation. 10/23/76, ANALYSIS: The subject 132 -acre plat submitted; by Business Development, Inc, anis R. M. Boggs Co, consists of ten lots- The ect areaM1-Light Industrial except for Lot 1, as described on thelAuditor'si1Plat, which is zoned M2 -Heavy Industrial. The D11 Zone classification allows for a wide variety of commercial and light industrial uses. Located in the Snyder Creek Watershed the upon drainage in the Ralston Creek Watershed. Becauseaofwthe recent adoption of the Storm Water Detention Ordinance, storm water management methods dill have Ao optit also be employed. The subject plat is submitted as a a preliminary subdivision Plat. preliminary Auditor's Plat rather than as, lots, tracts or parcels, p While an Auditors Plat subdivides P s avid it is required by the County Auditor only -for land into recordation and taxation purposes when such lots cannot be described except y fofi by metes and bounds description (see Staff Report Z-7624, dated 9/2176). An t in Auditor's Plat, however, does not obviate the submittal ox a subdivision plat in accordance with the procedural requirements of Chapter 409 of the Iowa Code or Chapter 9.50 of the Municipal Code except as an only less than acceptable alternative in the case of land preciously disposed by melees and bounds description Lots 1, 2, 4, 5 and 9 presumably had sold by metes and bounds description as implicated b of each lot shown on the lat. previously been enter into subdividing the land in accordance with theCit t ownership ry, therefore, that the. ,owners Code or that a combined subdivision plat and an Auditor's Plat for that portion of the property Y s Subdivision P P y not represented by ownership, be submitted. The Planning and Engineering Divisions have reviewed the subject plat, Deficiencies and discrepancies with Chapter 9,So of the Dlunicipal Code have been noted and the following changes should be made. 1• The title of the location map and plat should be reflective of a subdivision plat. II 2• The errors noted in the legal description of the plat should be corrected. I 3. The point of beginning should be indicated. 4. The right-of-way width of Scott Boulevard should be shown. 5. The plat should indicate that the contours are at Iowa City datum. 6 6 7 8. 9. 10. 11. 12 13 E -2- • The plat should show sanitary sewers which ts B.D.I. First Addition. would servo the lots i A sanitary s should be extended to s.D.I. 6 Bypass. First Addition if physhys ically iervice lots in B naccessible visa an existing sewer along Highwai,i The sanitary sewer serving Lot 9 should be extended to the northerly property line of Lot 10. The provision for sanitary sewer service to Lots 1 and 2 should be indicated. Heinz Road should terminate with a turn -around (cul-de extended to intersect with existing str-sac) or be eets. It should if the street is terminated, the cul-de-sac will be longer that, , necessitating be noted that a variance by the Planning and Zoningg an 900' Right-of-way COssion, along Scott dedicated to the City and Boulevard (40' from centerline) should be indicated on the plat. The area of the subdivision should be noted. A signature block for later endorsement by the City Clerl, of the City's approval of the plat should be provided. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is the Staff's recommendation that consideration of the subject plat be deferred pending addition and revision of the above, noted deficiencies and discrepancies, a 1,� I Q M E RC E -P, 690 120 JO p NORTH GRAPHIC SCALE : l"z 60W RIB FILE &S- 74 362 R 1A �I IR �` Iell \ i m • M CALENDAR OF PAST AND ONGOING ACTIVITIES OF THE IOWA CITY JOHNSON COUNTY ARTS COUNCIL Activities in Progress Art Survev 1976 1976 The Iowa City Johnson County Arts Council (ICJCAC) conducted a survey of local artists' activities and resource needs for the purposQ of compiling a directory that will help coordinate Johnson County, area art activities. The survey is an attempt to reach musicians, writers, dancers, crafts— persons, dramatic artists, folk artists and visual artists. Al:)roximately 1800 surveys have been mailed to students and local residents.. Money for the project was provided by the National Endowment for the, Arts (NEA) with matching funds from the Iowa City municipal government,. The directory was published in October 1976. Projects being Sponsored by the ICJCAC Projects being sponsored by the ICJCAC using program funds in City Spirit grant are currently being planned. The first project will be an art auction on October 23 to sell't�e services and works of local artists. Also a number of unspecitLed pt6r jects in the form of proposals for spending of the City Spiritidevelopment funds are still being reviewed by the council's steering committee. 1976 The ICJCAC received a Challenge Grant from the Iowa; Arts Cguncil which must be matched by the community to fund the following p4ojects; 1. a touring sculpture exhibit throughout the. county,. 2, performing and visual artists doing presentations. and work- shops in rural areas. 3. bi-monthly newsletter produced by area fiction writers and poets to centralize information on activities in the Johnson County area. 4. director's grants for technical and playwrights' workshops. 5. establishment of an outdoor pocket park gallery #ipr display of artists' work. 6. unspecified projects to be allocated to no more than six, performing and visual artists to be selected by the ICJCAC review committee. Awards 1975 In October, Governor Robert D. Ray presented an award to the Iowa City daily Press Citizen for a special section entitled "Sculpture;" The award was for the best feature in a daily newspaper. The section ,ias published in conjunction with the City Center Association and th{e Iowa City Johnson County Arts Council. 1976 The ICJCAC was given a Director's Grant from the Iarra Arts Council which must be matched by local funds. 1976 The ICJCAC was given a Challenge; Grant from the Iowa,Arts Council which must be: matched by local funds. 0 Crafts 1975 On May 28, a series of demonstrations from the Iowa City Recreation Department on the potter's wheel, painting, macrame, and other crafts were presented in the mini -park. Creative Readinij 1975 On May 28, the Creative Reading series sponsored by the Iowa City Public Library moved from College Hill Park to the mini -park -to cele- brate the Spirit of Black Hawk mural. 1975 On May 30, Dick Bausch read his original fiction in the mini - park. 1975 On June 7, Joe Haldeman conducted a prose reading in the mini- p ark. Exhibitions and Sales 1975 In May and June, all performances in the mini -park during the, painting of "The Spirit of Black Hawk" mural by the U. of I. Visual -Environ- mental Design Workshop were sponsored by the I'CJCAC. (See individual listings.) 1975 In October, a sculpture walk of about 60 sculptures by local, artists and students from the U. of I. School of Art and Art History was exhibited downtown. Six large pieces were shown on Washington Street. The other sculptures in a variety of media were displayed in windows of stores of the City Center Association members. 1975 The ICJCAC co-sponsored and funded, in part, a children's museum exhibit. 1976 The ICJCAC is co -sponsoring with Parks and Recreation an art and farmers' market in Chauncey Swan Plaza on weekends in the summer. Filing 1975 On May 27, Iowa City Public Library films "Merbabies," "The Rink," and "Pas de Deux" were viewed by the public in the downtow* park. Music 1975 On May 26, Pete Gary -Steve Delaney Trio played oldtime music in the mini -park. 1975 On May 26, Harry Oster played old,time, music and James Meade sang Irish songs and whistled in the mini -park. 1975 On May 29, Pete Dempster played on the harmonica in the mini - park while the mural of the Spirit of Black Hawk was in progress. 1975 On May 30, Harry Oster played olditime music in the miui-park during the painting of the super graphic. 1975 On May 30, the Iowa City Chamber Singers sang selections from their repertoire. 1975 On June 4, Harry Oster and James Meade played a selection of old music in the mini -park. 1975 on June 4, "The Seven Swabians" Voic 78 RPM Record Review, a wind-up record player show with old 78s, were presented in the downtgc7n park. • 1=7? On June 7 repertoire in the Jeffrey Warren 1975 downtown mini -park. Jazz pianist, Played from his On June 7, Ed Haycraft and the F Perform de together for a downtown blue 2=75 On June 9 first Ave Blue Grass ReyivaiL in the mini- IOng Shot grass rock mus concert. park. , a country rock musical 1975 In October, the Preucil School of Music group perfo symphony orchestra�ed� 1976 in the park, The ICJ Presented a childrenlls entertainment in thePCco-sPOnsored with Parks a Parks for a two month period3 Recreation weekly Po._�� 1975 On May the mil Y 26, Dan Mills read his 1975 original poetry and fiction in On May 27, Larry Moffi read ori 1975 On May 29, Mark Jarman held a Howard Aaron also ginal poet Aa read original n Original poet On June 4, Ernesto Poetry in the mini_ r' reading and town mini -Park, 'lrejo gave a Park. 1975 On J Poetry reading in the d 1 79 5 une 6, Mark Van TilburgOwn downtown— i- June 7, Marianne Freemagave a poetry reading, n mini -Park. gave a 1-97.5 In October poetry reading in the block with paper and ' Poet Dave Morice wrapped a downtown Iowa City 1975 with the sculpture festivalrcumventing the block, Sheila 1He denbrand her 11, Morty Sklar This, 11975 On October iioetry readings. Wormley, Chuck Mille SJoberg read > Steve Toth r and 1976 Poetry, , Cat DodY, David Morice in reside Currently emplo and Jbhn nce. Mr, Hall employed by ICJC"'C is Walter Hall and is available for is developing various ' a GO�unitr Public organization or t stud programs for the commEinitet numerous Y, readings and consultation tY Post. ` periodicals to his credit Hehas four Poaks, two anthologies y Is the ry itoror the De ed The following iandfnor Walter s a brief outline of the activt Hall, during the summer and earl ties of the Comm y . Fall of 1976, unity poet, 1976 In June County Home , the Community Poet began to continue on the sits were weekly regular visits has o a weekly basis Y through the summer O the. Johnson conducted worksho until June 1977. and are scheduled enthusiasticall shops on writing and At the Home ll B s xpressed sY cial ted p.1 Program Program ndothe dmietry, Ther Walter iden� have Besides working pecial assure with and the a nistration ng on writing the cooperation a Rf the Home 1976 From June thrg Projects' Hall regularly mong residents. John Bix erl at the U. of I. h ugust Y reads poems;, twice , the Community Poet workied w each week. U. of Pital School and ith,2gr, 1976 From Ju Y sessions, will cOttducted writi' Center every week and through August, Hall tCnue through the year sessions dents who were re read poems or discussed sited the IOwa Ci bi-weekl interested in literature. writingtY Care Y schedule th.rou This with a group of real, through the gear. P'r°gram will continue on,a r�� 777; i 1976 From J Care Center Jun through Au groupin Lone 'Tree gust, Hall visited the of residents. This Iowa' and, read Lone Tree. 1_ 976 From June Will continue by°ems, each week t0 a Retirement through Au nue weeki This Residence weekly gust' Hall v Y through the Program will cmntin Y and read Poems toed the Oakno''1 yeah., 1976 From June ue bi-weekly throu gr°u of poems through Au gh the re;s�dents.;;, to residents of the Lant gust Year: Ce 1 i6 SFrom June through n ParkaCl visited We, kly anci�I read raterger Solon, Iowa Augu4clt. Hall�v'Cem enter in Coralcr[lle bates with interest ^ anti react isited t ?t , bi-weekly throu ed year. �PdThis progi ed ho;ritinn'4a�e through the idents on s 1976 Since Will cJ'fro;- Center" June Continuos, 4e weekly and has has Will the Beverl I group poems Y 1Sanor C tinue weeklyof ver y interested °'r discussed wa:itin acre 1976-9 through June residents. This. .pro ''with a. 1977 C°mmunit 1977„ g.am will in_thee-S-o_1 Pro Y Poet Walter i.on_ school year, gram in Johnson C' Hall is co.nductiiig a p September 7 Hall began the first °unty Schools gelrY at Hoover School and Classes through the 464 is scheduled to in this prO6ram on. well work Lakeview September 8 at hills o as in several a2 iew School 1. four Iowa Cit in Solon School He eachseparate schools Y schools. Hall ex,during. octobea' Poet vermony of this program Aur visits to each s'chhol ,to worTii?ri r normall Y Is in the P PrOJect this extents, $,t,,idthing Y coat between fn OetrY-in-the-Sch a"I Y and one hundred doO°ls Prog am wo, llai^s per day. Spy-ture 1975 The ICJCAC the cost of two lar found contributions for the pi display in downtowngIowaeces Cit of sculpture t local share of tributions 350 y• ICJCAC ° be °n Permanent s Project wast$ggp000 local residents, "tailed request _ ion al Endo for the half that The cos t; of tlhe.scuT ton wment amount p ure City each contributed$1.2,500 Arts, pro• Provided by the 1975 $12 5 Ject Green and Nat - In October n 00 the Cit, Ray was scheduled to ' at the Sculptue F of 2otir� dedication give the keynote estival, Gover address at n°;'Robert;.; the sculpture, ''j Th -h ea�L 1976 In Ma rch here was adinc Iowaial pcitylyoutcb ide Auditorium be °f ish, h Orchrestra Y t:he CommunitMacLe;` Bicentenn.. i 1976 y Players; The 76 On April 23 19761so performed that a multi -media blendin ' the ICJCAC night= presented in Mmedia e g of dance se, vis a `7tedia,� City Bicentennial Auditorium ?Time, visuals �}tnthesi 1975 Week. in conjunction with the hovslc' Before On 29 a Play written tt Iowa Summer (directed by Deb Dou mini -Park. / 9fhte, ty�}'Wasachran, ^Night „The P. Fishermn June and Hishw Culens Perfiprmed;nn the !I a come' 1975 OnnJune 6, The Duck's " in the downitowneers lowapCrfprmed it5r are tine play Y far the p4'Ofitle of Johnson Chhxnt}SYineiowa eat; ac per] Formed + 0 6 1975 On October 9 there were performances by the Coulens Pupeteers and bu the Duck's Breath Mystery Theater in IOkYa.Gi 1975 On October 11 The New Iowa Players pr show for the public. esented a,var Workslioas � 1976 On March 20, the ICJCAC co -•sponsored, wajth the; U, a£ ]�. Art and Art History departments, a Legal Aids Workshop for Yisuaj]G. artists and lawyers interested in copyright, contract and; tax Protection for artists. Three sessions were open to the public., 1976 The ICJCAC co-sponsored a workshop for artists who c., interested in forming a co, -op, le 1976 On April 24, The ICJCAC sponsored a Children's Bicen- tennial Drawing Workshop at the Iowa City Recreation Center. Summary of Administrative Budget, Fiscal Year 77 Iowa City/Johnson County Arts Council I. Personnel: Total Director 12,000; Clerical 7,416 19,416 II. Fringe Benifits: FICA (19,416X .0585) 1,170 IPERS (19,416X .o475) 950 Health Insurance (55.10/ea. mon.) 661 Life Insurance (4.00/1,000) 80 Workmen's Compensation (.90/1,000) 18 Subtotal ------ 2,859 2,859 III. Equipment and Supplies Office Supplies 2,300 Telephone 760 Printing 1,000 Postage 600 Travel (In state) 800 Subtotal 5,460 - 5,460 IV. Program Development 2,600 V. Indirect Cost 360 Total 30,635 * Iowa Arts Council has awarded $2,700 toward Directors salary between September 1, and August 31,1977. This sum must be matched dollar for dollar. ;i 1 Summary of Administrative Budget, Fiscal Year 77 Iowa City/Johnson County Arts Council I• Personnel- Director- Responsibilities include developing and maintain Council membership, preparing program presentations, developing in the arts and crafts throughout Johnson Count g Arts funds to support a paid staff. Y and .raising Clerical- Responsibilities include typing, anserwing the phone maintaining the files. II. Fringe Benifits: FICA- The formula .0585 X the amount earned by the employee is for our share of the required social security. IPERS- A state employee, and employer matching retirement program, .0475 multiplied by earnings. Health Insurance- Blue Cross Blue Shield of Iowa, full family coverage. Life Insurance- Manufactures Life, coverage is closest $,000 to earnings in one year. Workmen's compensation -Coverage is the minimum required b statute. y state III' Equipment and Supplies: Office Supplies- typwritter rental, paper,envelops, paper clips and etc. Telephone- Watt's Line, switchboard fees, service charges and long distance fees. 'Printing- StationaYy, minutes, and promotion posters. Postage- promotion, minutes, artist services, activities support and general business mailings. ,support Travel- trips -m_-the county to provide services solicit , � r programs, and tr workshopsips to special seminars and IV- Program Development: To meet expenses for girt fairs s workshops, art auctions, and other community art fairs, actseminars, einars, V. Indirect Cost: Items to small or unexpected to list iS• n other areas, • `, INFORMAL COUNCIL DISCUSSION OCTOBER 4, 1976 1:30 P.M. INFORMAL COUNCIL DISCUSSION: October 4, 1976, 1:30 P.M, Conference Room, Mayor Neuhauser presiding. COUNCILMEMBERS PRESENT: Neuhauser, Foster, Perret ' Selzer, Vevera, deProsse. Absent: Balmer, STAFFMEMBERS PRESENT: None Kraft Berlin Vann, Showalter, Stolfus' Schreiber, Geshwiler, Hayek, Schmeiser, Miller, Kushaiir AGENDA QUESTIONS Mayor Neuhauser commented that the public hearings, on Items 11 12, and 13 would be combined at the formal meetin all concerning the tree regulations. g as they are' Councilman Vevera advised that he would not vote for zoning of Plum Grove Acres (Court Hill after reading the Cit q the re- thatzoning En ineer�•'' Scott Blvd. Addn. #S) meeting. City Engineer report on this The Mayor -requested g• rezoning at the regular Councilman Selzer called attention to a discrepanc y tthe word- aterial o LargefScalethe mResidentiaplsubdivisionaining the Planned Area Development and for suggested that the Ordinance establishinA &—�artmen lution Accepting g the PAD He Oct. 5, g the LSRD be adopted at the regularand the Reso- The City Manager advised that he wouldcheckts it is possible. meeting on to see if Concerning the rezoning of the Haopv Hollow man Vevera advised that he would b p in Pla r°und, Neal Berlin Council - al pointed out that the staff was "no"• City Manager. an belused1foron in a previous bond issue, and that HCDAinvestigmone} might nation as a purchase. Council discussed the propert ' storm water detention area. property -s desig- Councilman Balmer asked for an ex Plan Coordinic, _Committee's planation of the Co�Yehe^n_ ve CZ, participatipn, recommendations concerning the Neuhauser stated that thecCPCCswantedetob Y Ha _ill. Mayor view, and to try and survey the entire get a wider point of Manager pointed out that there was it deommuni,ty. The City Process. The Mayor noted that there will be time to end the Council with an alternative e proposal. ion to and if she a tioned why Rauber had not commCouncilmanBalmercommented on the vegetation guide„ hd been consulted. The City Manager stated that Page 2 she had been consulted but she doesn't everything being put into it, and she and express her viewpoint, and is free Councilmembers agreed that she should on the tree ordinances. 0 Council Discussion October 4, 1976 necessarily agree with would be pleased to come to do that. Several come for the discussion Councilman Balmer also questioned why work had been delayed until the Land Use Plan and Zonln Ordinance was completed, and thought it should be at the top of tEie 'list for completion and why the tree ordinances (and Riverfront Commission brochure) had been worked on. Mayor Neuhauser explained that it has been started, but will take longer than other plans; much -of the Riverfront Comm. brochures had been done by Horton and the Stanley consultants. Councilman Balmer also pointed out the delay in getting the City Park improvements, and questioned why the environmental review had not been done earlier. The City Manager noted that the _ schedule had been presented, and the environmental review state- ments had been completed. He stated that it was imperative that all rules and regulations are followed, or we end; up in a hassle with the federal government. Councilman Vevera, added that if there was a bond issue on Happy Hollow, what was the money was spent for. The City Manager explained that after appraisal of the property in 1966, a motion to purchase the Happy Hollow playground was voted down by the Parks and Recreation Commission, and these minutes were accepted by Council. Mayor Neuhauser stated that the changes in M1 -M2 Zones and the Mgbi1a Home Ordinance are being held so that they can be a part of the total Zoning Ordinance. Councilman Balmer questioned, what the City's share of the revenue sharing would be. The City Manager advised that he had not received what the entitle- ment would be, but as soon as it was received, he would let Council know. Councilman Vevera asked if it had ever been determined who owned the bank of dirt in the vicinity of Emerald Street Apts. & Cal- vin Court. The City Manager stated that he would check it oft. Mayor Neuhauser proposed that some indication be given by Coun- cil concerning the alley behind Seiferts, and advised that she would ask the City Attorney later. Councilman Selzer asked whether or not the City had a policy that they were not inspecting sinalQ famil owner -occupied residences, because of the August report :From code enforcement dUYiBj_o_n, The Mayor replied that they were probably a result: of complaints. It was noted that the City does not charge a fee for inspections. Councilman Balmer called attention to the dispute as to who is taking care of the plantings on Wa'shintbn i Page 3 Council Discussion October 4, 1976 Street in front of the First National Bank, and stated that there was no grass, but weeds. Administrative Assistant Linda Schreiber advised that there was a question as to whether or not the City will accept the work in that area. The City Manager advised that there will be replacements of several shrubs and trees. Councilman Selzer commented that he had not as yet received the information from the Public Works Department concerning the right-of-wav_along Scott Boulevard. Councilwoman deProsse explained a complaint she had received regarding the WXD11g-tree being cut down in front of the house at 1817 C Street. The City Manager advised he would look into it. Mayor Neuhauser called attention to the letter in the pack- et regarding her appointment as a member of the Q=vn >tw De- velopment and Housing Committee of the U323te�1States Conference of Mayors. She requested Council's consent to attend the Novemr ber 7-8 meeting in Chicago and the January 18-19 meeting in Washington, D.C., advising Council that she would report back on these meetings. There were no Council objections. Councilman Selzer noted his opposition to the statement in Hous- ing Comm. minutes of Sept. 8 regarding the requirement 'that presale inspection of structures containing one or more dwelling units should be mandatory rather than voluntary. Councilwoman deProsse also asked if it had been determined what the legal interpretation was concerning the liability of the City on jia:7 spections. The City Manager commented that the legal staff would write an opinion. JOHNSON COUNTY ARTS COUNCIL Jim Evans, Donna Friedman and Mary Jane McLaughlin were present to discuss their proposal. It was pointed out that the, Arts Council has the use of an office in the Parks & Rec. Dept, area,. and the City provides staff assistance and some supplies, con- tributing approximately $11,000 in this manner. Friedman explained -the City Spirit Grant and the accomplish- ments of the group. McLaughlin discussed the funding, and the need for a Director. Evans discussed the solicitation of pri- vate contributions, noting that they are also beginning, a spon- soring membership category, through private business. It was noted that the Iowa Arts Council grant provided $2,700 for a director, which must be matched. Councilman Balmer noted the budgetary limits of the City. The City Manager pointed out if this organization is to be successful in the long run, it should not be dependent on the City for a handout: each year. Council- man Vevera expressed concern, advising that he is more inter- ested in correcting sewer and street problems. Councilman Selzer suggested there should be a happy medium, citing the Page 4 Council Discussion October 4, 1976 example of Project Green. A fund raising event is planned for December. The Mayor advised that it was hard when Council is trying to economize in government, with only a 7% increase allowed next year in the budget, to justify funding for a new* director position. The funding being asked for is $50 a month and office space. The City Manager advised that it could.be funded from the Aid, to Agencies fund. A .formal motion con- cerning this funding will be made at the regular council meeting. REHAB-- BPROGRAM Program Coordinator Julie Vann and Consultant Mike Kucharzak; were present to explain the financing packages for the Housing Rehabilitation Program and to define the rehab property stand- ards as presented in the September 29th memo. After Council approval of their proposed procedures, the Pn i*onm ntal review for the program should be ready by October 18th. The staff to be hired should be able to start by November 1st, and the pro- gram will be ready by November 15th. The time schedule for the environmental review process was dis- cussed. The review could be challenged. HUD's role has changed considerably. They make sure that we have followed prescribed advertising procedures, etc. Vann explained that any house that participates in the program will have to be brought up to minimum housing code standards, the, same standards that the enforcement division uses, for consistency. Other considerations would include (1) energy conservation, (2) fire prevention, and (3) incipient code vio- lations. These are in the order of priority. Kucharzak; ex- plained the rationale behind the figure used for grant ceiling. He noted that our minimum standards area typical code. In mid-November recommendations from staff and the major community lenders as to how to best work up options on financing program will be presented to Council. General contractors will be bid- ding on a package. Councilman Selzer called attention to the difficulties in ob- taining a building inspector, and commented that the success of the program depends on the adequacy of the inspection., it was noted that in Sec. 6.c.3., the income was yearly not monthly. Councilman Vevera asked whether or not the improvements would raise taxes. Kucharzak commented that some of the money would be used for deferred maintenance, or repairs, and should not raise the market value, but addition of a new room would raise taxes. Vann pointed out that thd by e grants will be processed �` the City, not the banks, and discussed the eligibility require- ments. Page 5 Council Discussion October 4, 1976 Vann explained their proposal that out of the total $450.,000' allotment, $100,000 was to be used for site improvements for the neighborhood (such as sidewalks); $125,000 used for a minimum of 25 grants at $5,000 each; $40,000 for a minimum of 8 forgivable loans. Kucharzak explained avoiding "wind- fall" for persons other than the low-income person being served; Mayor Neuhauser called attention to provisions for handicapped People. Kucharzak suggested taking this under consideration and having the Advisory Board include it as a specific objec tive. Councilman Selzer complimented Julie Vann; and Consult- ant Mike Kucharzak on their simple, straight -forward, well- prepared program. VILLAGE GREEN SOUTH Concerning acquisition of a bikeway path from Mercer Park to Scott Boulevard, and triangles for park land Co Dir. Kraft advised that the developer ' to dedy bev. the 40' strip (which is measured starting€from dthe edge: of the railroad right-of-way), East, the triangles ouldnbeadedicated mtotthe nCitye€orQheigh- walter out- borhbod parks. Parks and Recreation Director Sho lined their proposed plans for ground cover that does not need; much maintenance, and planting of pine tree seedlings. Coun- cilman unle questioned out thatt unleaccess to the triangles, and pointed ss the easements are fenced, it will do no good. Senior Planner Don Schmeiser pointed out the 10' easements for walkways to each triangle and explained previous discussion with the developer. the sanitar Councilman Foster asked, whether or not y sewer problems had been ironed out. The City Mans- ` ger stated that they had not. Council discussed the. deyeloper'is proposal to enlarge the B.D.I. sewer to take care of the addi- tional ground., Councilman Selzer asked that the Staff deter- i mine what the required capacity might be. The Mayor no ped that the subdivision could not be approved until agreement that sewEgal arrangements are feasible. The City Manager commented that thele was no way to determine what maximum develo ; bu what staff is looking at is the absolute figure available to B.D.I. uld be The observation was made that the triangles, about ,7 of an acre each, were useless land for the developer. Chairman of Parks and Recreation Commission Tom Cilek commented that, a specific agreement should be made concerning all five triangles,..In answer to the Mayor's request for his recommendation, the City Manager stated that the 40' was desirable for a bike path and the pocket parks would be O.K. Cost for asphalt was 9 Page 6 discussed and Council Discuss1on October 4, 1976 be used. It was suggested that recycled as a 401 The City Manager stated that easement, but not for he saw a const could' that the matter be referred the trian consensus jL a recommendat' back to gles, The Mayor su " Kraft mmend tion on the appropriate Community Develo g4E" ted on Tuesday, that he would width for Pment #car bring this a bicycle pabhl. information to Counc��, PARKING ON PRIVATE PROPERTY Police Ass -c Chief Harvey Miller Attorne called attention to the that cities y Tony KushnI" Remo froom Ing of unauthoriz have this As e result of ized vehicles Power, he had stopped e °Pinion Wingate, Gloria Dei Lutheran parking on the ticket; tian Church, were Private pert �, Present for Church, and Rev. Pro y• R�_v. was made that the the discussion, We, First CFu�is_ law to retribution polic The obsery cies, the After y was exposing those atioii Council directed City of past andpresent using the strongest law possible to Y Attorne Fre e vate property, control unauthorized tO draft the on pri�� It was moved executive by Poster and seconded b on Co session to discuss the y Perret immunity Needs, appointment too adjourn to Neuhauser, Perret, Selzer roll call Balmer, deProt $e committee carried, 7�0 e , and Ve dimer Upon vera voted ��ayen, r Poster, Motion Tape recorded on Reel 932 City of Iowa City MEIMORAN IDURA, DATE: October 1, 1176 TO: City Council FROM: City Manager RE: Informal Session Agendas October 4, 1976 14onday I j � i 1:30 - 5:00 P.M. 1:30 P.M. - Review Council Agenda 1:45 P.M. - Council Time 2:00 P.M. - Iowa City -Johnson County Arts Council 2:30 P.M. - Discuss Rehabilitation Program, Property Standards and Financing Plans 3:30 P.M. - Discuss the dedication of land in Village Green South with Parks F, Recreation Commission 4:00 P.M. - Discuss the enforcement of parking on private property 4:30 P.M. - aecutive session to fill vacancy on Committee on Community Needs 7:30 P.M. - Debate, Mayor Neuhauser and Committee for Decent Housing Wesley House Lounge !� October 5, 1976 _ htesday !� 7:30 P.M. - Regular Council Meeting October 11, 1976 Monday 1:30 - 4:30 P.M. 1:30 P.M. - Auditor's Report to Council 2:00 P.M. - Discuss Library Building proposal with Library Board 3:00 P.M. - Discuss Handicapped Program 3:45 P.M. - Review Council Agenda 4:00 P.M. - Council Time October 12, 1976 Tuesday 7:30 P.M. - Regular Council Meeting Pending List Alarm Systems - Police/Fire Review Title XX with Bob Hibbeler 3/8 Anti -Trust Ordinance Risk Management Campaign Finance Ordinance Section 8 Housing Proposal q Application Design Review Committee Authority Model Traffic Ordinance Housing Inspection Program Parking Policy Resource Recovery, Coralville and University of Iowa • City ®of Yowp C;atay. DATE: October 1, 1976 70: City Council FROM: City Manager RE: Material in Friday's Packet Brochures: 'frees and Energy, City of Fort Collins, Colorado I7ay ' Towa City Riverfront Commission 1'725 Memoranda from the City Manager: a. Development Adjacent to Scott Boulevard 1,72.6 b. Revenue Sharing Bill 172; c. Audit 1'7213 ff Memorandum fiwn Julie Vann regarding Monday Council Housing Rehabilitation discussion, 1 74"24 Monthly report for the month of August for the Department of Community Development. 130 Copy of memorandum to Chief of Police from Assistant City Attorney regarding private parking. Memorandum from Assistant City Attorney regarding 1iti.gat,ion.See- al4 -40� Copy of letter from United States Conference of Mayors to Mayor Neuhauser. Soc.Od 4 Agenda for U.S. Conference of Mayors Housing meeting in Chicago, October, 27a`- 29, 19V /735 5 O or. Copy of letter to Mr. David Johansen from City Attorney. i 735 Letter to Ms. Ruth Roesch from Director of Community Development in reply to a letter' on a recent agenda. /736 Minutes of City/University meeting, September 2, 1976. 17-T7 Agenda for October 6 meeting of Committee on Community Needs. t738 Final report for Youth Employment Projects / 7.39 Calendar for month of October, 1976. Interagency Newsletter. 175x0 Financial Report. /741/ S'tR�f /Ropok /7'7� ��Fz eoK,N�. Oct .�). (c7N3,� joi t4sa7V Co • WCS �OUNLC�Q 1743 uudulWua °QF— (7� SummARy o� pdrruruoiJctLtcnrE -&d9Q� FY77 1 7/4H Aj� vil,l/