Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1983-05-10 Info PacketCity of Iowa City MEMORANDUM Date: May 5, 1983 To: City Council i From: Neal G. Berlin, City Manager Re: Historical Review of the Hotel UDAG Application The Urban Development Action Grant (UDAG) regulations require an evaluation report when a proposed UDAG project might directly or indirectly affect a National Register of Historic Places property. For Iowa City's UDAG, the State of Iowa Historic Preservation Office is empowered to make the determination as to whether the College Block Building, a National Register property, will be adversely effected in an indirect manner by the proposed hotel on Parcel 64 -lb. If a determination of adverse effect is made, a report and an A-106 agreement must be completed before UDAG funds are released. The City has been in correspondence with Adrian Anderson, Executive Director of the State Historic Preservation Office as to whether the College Block Building is adversely affected by the hotel project as defined by the UDAG regulations. Mr. Anderson feels the project does fall under regulation guidelines; in his opinion the hotel's massing and shadowing create an adverse aesthetic impact. The City has responded that both of these issues (massing and shadowing) have been discussed extensively by the Hotel/Department Store Steering Committee and have been resolved to the satisfaction of the Committee and the City Council. It has also been noted that the owners of the College Block Buildng have been notified throughout the design process. Andrea Hauer and one or two members of the Committee will be going to Des Moines on Thursday to convey our concern with the Office's findings and to respond to whatever other concerns may be raised. I would hope this meeting would conclude with a less negative attitude toward the hotel project on the part of the Office and with a clear understanding as to what the process and the timing of remaining actions will be. tp/sp i I.11CROFILMED BY i I 1. -JORM "MIC R�ILAB CEDAR ARI'IDB DES 1.101YE5 f am J City of Iowa City MEMORANDUM Date: May 4, 1983 To: City Council From: City Manager , � Re: Library Contract with Johnson County Recently Mayor Neuhauser and I met with Lolly Eggers and Ed Zastrow to review the status of negotiations with Johnson County. It was agreed that it be desirable for the City to undertake completion of the negotiations. Accordingly, the enclosed draft letter and contract have been prepared for the Johnson County Board of Supervisors. Additional background information also is provided. At the informal Council session of May 9 the City Council could determine if this material is consistent with the Council's intent. In the interim if you have any questions, please contact me. bdw/sp cc:. Lolly Eggers Ed Zastrow i 141CROFILMED BY . ` JORM--MICRbLAB- .i CEDAR RAPIDS •DES td0I YE5 9/0 J .,1 DRAFT April 21, 1983 Johnson County Board of Supervisors P.O. Box 1350 Iowa City, Iowa 52244 Dear Supervisors: i For some months you and the Iowa City Library Board of Trustees have been attempting to negotiate a satisfactory financial arrangement I for fiscal year 1984. As the City Council actually approves and funds the budget for the Iowa City Public Library, it app -tars that it I would be more appropriate for the City Council and the Board of i Supervisors to negotiate a service contract. In addition, the Supervisors and the City Council have other areas of mutual concern which from time to time require consultation and concurrence. Accordingly, the City Council wishes to recommend to the Board of I Supervisors a contract for services which is predicated upon the very satisfactory and workable arrangement which the City and the Board of Supervisors have developed for Senior Center services. If the Board of Supervisors deems it appropriate to approve a payment Of $90,000 in FY84 and adoption at this time of an agreement which would establish a procedure for funding library service in future Years, the City Council would be pleased to proceed with such an arrangement. A draft contract is enclosed. W0 f J MICROFILMED BY (1 --JORM"-MICRf L:AI3* CEDAR RAPIDS DES M01NES I i� l 111CRDFILI4ED BY r l" JORM MICR#CAI CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOVE DRAFT AGREEMENT FOR LIBRARY 0 RURAL JOHNSON COUNTY This agreement, made and entered into this day of , 1983, by and between the City of Iowa City and Johnson County. WHEREAS, the City of Iowa City has established and provides funds for a public library operated by the Iowa City Public Library Board of Trustees; and WHEREAS, Chapter 3588.18 of the 1981 Code of Iowa allows the County Board of Supervisors to contract with a city library for residents of unincorporated areas; and WHEREAS, Johnson County wishes to avail the residents of unincorprated Johnson County of the opportunity to participate in the programs of the Iowa City Public Library; NOW THEREFORE it is hereby agreed by and between the City of Iowa City and Johnson County as follows: I. SCOPE OF SERVICES i A. The extent and nature of library services will be determined by the Iowa City Public Library Board of Trustees. B. All services of the Iowa City Public Library will be provided to all of the residents of Johnson County, Iowa, who reside outside the corporate limits of any city within Johnson County on the same terms and conditions as to the residents of the City of Iowa City, Iowa. II. DURATION AND TERMINATION The terms of this agreement shall commence July 1, 1983, for a period of one year and shall be renewed automatically for succeeding terms of one year each unless 120 days notice to the contrary is given to either party. III. COMPENSATION Johnson County agrees to pay 10% of the net budget for operating costs of the public library, or 85% of the maximum allowable levy for county library contracts (274 per $1,000 assessed valuation of unincorporated areas, Chapter 331.421, Section 10, ACTS 1981, 69 G.A.) whichever shall be the lesser amount. The net budget for operating costs of the library shall be arrived at by deducting any funding of operating costs by sources other than the City of Iowa City. Operational costs shall include personnel, commodities, services and charges and capital outlay necessary to operate the facility. All payments shall occur quarterly commencing on the first. day of July of each year. Iowa City agrees to maintain records of said operational expenses according to mutually acceptable auditing procedures and further agrees to make said records available for auditing and inspection during business hours, upon reasonable notice by the County. IV. BUDGET PROCEDURE The City Council shall determine and approve an annual operating budget for the library after preparation and recommendation by the Library Board of Trustees including consultation with the County's representative on the Library Board. rte' I 1 i 141CRDFILIIED BY 1 -"JORM MICROLA©- " CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOVIES I i r� J 2 A. On or before January 1 of each year Iowa City shall transmit to the County a proposed library budget for the fiscal year which commences on July 1 of that year. B. On or before February 1 of each year, Johnson County shall transmit to Iowa City a resolution of commitment to fund 10% of the operating costs of the library for the year which commences on July 1 of that year in such amount as will not exceed 10% of the proposed budget or an amount which is 85% of the maximum levy as cited in paragraph III above, whichever shall be the lesser amount. The dollar amount of 85 percent of the maximum levy shall be cited in the resolution. C. On or before March 15th of each year, Iowa City shall adopt a final library budget for the ensuing fiscal year. Johnson County shall thereupon be obligated to pay not -to -exceed ten percent of the net adopted budget for operating costs or the amounts previously transmitted to Iowa City under sub -paragraph I4 (B) above, whichever shall be the lesser amount. 0. Subsequent amendments to the library budget in any fiscal year shall not increase the obligation of the County for financial support unless mutually agreed to by both parties. E. The budget procedure and formula set forth above shall commence with fiscal year 1985. For fiscal year 1984, it is mutually agreed that the county shall pay $90,000. This agreement shall be filed with the City Clerk of Iowa City and the County Recorder of Johnson County, Iowa. CITY OF IOWA CITY, IOWA JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA By: BY: Mary Neuhauser, Mayor Donald Se r, Chairman Board of Supervisors ATTEST: ATTEST: City Clerk Tom Slockett, County Auditor 9ie J j MICROFILI ED BY 1. -DORM "MIC RE1CA13- % CEDAR RAPIDS •DES MDI JCS � I ` f i ' J MEMORANDUM Iowa City Public Library TO: Riley Grime's FROM: CT R E : Your request DATE: 3-22-83 i FY IC?L d3efo J.C. Fee J.C. Share J.C. Circ j 1980 $536,251 $42,960 8% 9,8 i i 1981 668,119 52,713 7.90. 11.7 i 1982 799,583 69,650' 8.70. 11.4 1983 933,707 80,473 8.6% 10.9 ¢ 1984 (prop) /U / 107,617 44Z At I � /o161L7Y (alt.) (988,3eej (90,000) -(9.2%) 100. est. 1 � bausJ vn �£� 6rnunt� I cc: LE EZ ,Qe..3/47/ 13 �,/o 1 i MICROFILMED RY i. --- JORM-'MICROCA B' L% CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES r � L.. r Iowa City Public Library 123 South Linn, Iowa City, Iowa 52240 April 6, 1983 Edi Kspd>,u -rb�2VPP5Po�e.�" wa� q LtSft4 t: f?W 6 OTAd I$t Sup uv . Lolly Eggers. Director Information (319) 356-5200 Business (319) 356-5206 Johnson County Board of Supervisors Box 1350 Iowa City, Iowa 52244 Dear Board of Supervisors: In response to questions and statements received from members of the' Board of Supervisors regarding our most recent proposal for library services for FY 1984, I submit the following information: 1. Federal Funds Used for New Library Building There was $14,000 in federal revenue sharing used for initial planning funds in 1977-78 and $35,000 from the National Telecommunications and Information Administration for video equipment. This latter amount was matched with over $50,000 from referendum money. 2. Use of University of Iowa Library by Area Residents Members of the public may apply for a free permit, issued for 3 to 6 months, to use designated parts of the collection while working on a specific research project. Generally, this does not provide access to the browsing room where new popular materials are kept. For more information, I suggest you check with University of Iowa Library Director Dale Bentz. 3. Request to See File of Johnson County Registered Borrowers The only access to our computer-based file of Johnson County borrowers is to have the computer print out records for all borrowers coded "Johnson County." We did that a year ago to produce the study of Johnson County borrowers that Director Eggers prepared for the Supervisors in the fall of 1981. Libraries do not provide access to their circulation records and borrowers' files and in Iowa there is legal protection as library records are exempt from the public records law (Chapter 68A.7, Section 13). 4. Proposed Formula for FY85 and Beyond A. 85% of Maximum Levy is based on recognition of two points: 1) ICPL now provides about 85% of the total circulation of Johnson County libraries. 2) The County will probably be forced to levy the maximum soon because of the heavy demand for library service in this county. 9io r r i f11CROFILMED BY i "-JORM-MICR;LAS CEDAR RAPIDS • DES 11018E5 i �1 Board of Supervisors April 6, 1983 Page 2 B. 10% of Library Operating Budget. To establish what would be the county's fair share of the Library's operating budget, the past record of their share of circulation, not the share of what the county has actually paid, must be considered. 10% is slightly less than the county's average share of circulation for the past five years. While the county share of circulation dropped slightly the first six months of FY83 compared to a year ago, at 10.9% it is stilt higher than any other year except FY82. .5. Per Capita Comparison The county's per capita cost for library service is only 1/5 of what Iowa City residents are paying for all costs related to the library. Even if we consider only the tax supported portion of the Library's operating budget (i.e. - excluding contracts, fees, city administrative costs and debt service) the county has been paying less than 1/3 of what city residents pay. In FY82, 25 Iowa counties paid more per capita for library service for rural residents than Johnson County. The range in FY82 was from $5.21 to $12.68 while Johnson County was paying $5.11. Indeed, nine of them paid more per capita in FY81-82 than the $6.90 we originally proposed that the county pay in FY83-84. Thus, it is evident that Johnson County residents are getting better service for less money than many, many Iowa rural residents. The Iowa City Public, Library is probably the outstanding public library in Iowa. Its construction was tightly and comptetently managed. It was finished on time and under budget. The staff today is no larger than it was in 1979 when construction began. State-of- the-art services are offered. Yet, rural residents get access to these facilities and services for an amount less than 1/3 of what Iowa City residents pay. Sincerely, Ed Zastrow, President Library Board of Trustees be/sp 1 r� i MICROFILMED BY f 1 _.-JORM - MICR46LAO CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES I MEMORANDUM Iowa City Public Library TO: NEAL BERLIN FROM: LOLLY EGGERS R E I JOINT AGREEMENT REGARDING JOHNSON COUNTY CONTRACT DAT E: MAY 5, 1983 Attached are 2 copies of a joint agreement regarding FY84 and future contracts with the Johnson County Board of Supervisors that the Library Board of Trustees adopted at their meeting of 4/28/83. Would you bring it before the Council for their consideration? It seems like a goad idea to have it written down someplace. The agreement is modeled on the Council/ Board joint agreement regarding negotiations with AFSCME. Let me know if you have questions. MICROrILMED BY 11. JORM--MICRbLAO" CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOUES I 9iv 0 J JOINT AGREEMENT BETWEEN IOWA CITY LIBRARY BOARD OF TRUSTEES AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF IOWA CITY REGARDING CONTRACT WITH JOHNSON COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS FOR LIBRARY SERVICE TO RURAL JOHNSON COUNTY. WHEREAS, Chapter 20, Article II of the Iowa City Code of Ordinances empowers the Board of Trustees of the Iowa City Public Library to authorize the use of the Library by non-residents of the city and to fix charges for this use; and WHEREAS, the Library Board may need to exercise this power from time to time to provide library services to other jurisdictions in this county or library region; and WHEREAS, the Library Board has contracted with the Johnson County Board of Supervisors since 1968 to provide library service to Johnson County rural residents; and WHEREAS, it now seems beneficial to both bodies, given Iowa City Council's financial responsibilities and Iowa City Library Board's administrative responsibilities, to have the Iowa City Council take over the responsibility for negotiating contracts with the Board of Supervisors. NOW, THERFORE, IT IS AGREED AS FOLLOWS: 1. For Fiscal Year 1984, beginning July 1, 1983, the City Council of Iowa City will negotiate and execute a contract for library services with the Johnson County Board of Supervisors. 2. The City Council will continue to be the contracting party for future contracts for as long as both the Council and the Library Board feel it is a mutually acceptable arrangement. 3. The Library Board will continue to be the body that decides what services the Library shall offer to all library users. 4. The contract between the City Council and the Johnson County Board of Supervisors will be for all services currently provided by the Library unless there is an amendment to this agreement. 5. This agreement in no way alters the Library Board's power to contract with other jurisdictions. 4dwinJ. ZaV,r�esident Iowa City ary Bo of Trustees Mary Neuhauser, Mayor, City of Iowa City Date 1 r i MICROFILMED BY JORM--MICROLAB-i -j CEDAR RAPIDS • DES HONES f � gra r,. J City of Iowa City MEMORANDUM Date: May 5, 1983 To: City Council, City Manager and Department Heads From: City Clerk !y" Re: Institute of Municipal Clerk's Conference I will be gone to the annual Municipal Clerk's conference the week of May 23rd and will return late Friday afternoon, the 27th. In my absence the Deputy, Ramona Parrott, will be alone in the office. Please try and keep your requests to a minimum and allow sufficient time to honor your requests. Ramona will also be attending the formal Council meeting of May 24th. The informal Council session on May 23rd will be attended by Jill Smith. Jill has been attending the informal sessions for the past three months as the part-time minute taker. Please feel free to contact me if you should have any questions. bj2/9 I I MICROFILMED BY "JORM-MICR46LAB- CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES I i City of Iowa City MEMORANDUM DATE: April 29, 1983 TO: City Council FROM: City Clerk RE: Beer/Liquor Sunday Sales/Conditional Approval FOR YOUR INFORMATION --- Conditional approval was given at the 1/18/83 Council meeting to Simmy's, 208 N. Linn St. for Class C Liquor Sunday Sales license. They have submitted, after the 90 -day period, the required information which allows them to retain their permit. i MICROFILMED DY DORM -MIC R#LAO � CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES 9f" City of Iowa City MEMORANDUM Date: May 5, 1983 To: City Council and City Manager 90 From: Rosemary Vitosh, Director of Finance Re: FY83 Capital Projects Budget For the past two years, we have not done an annual capital project budget but instead relied upon the five year Capital Improvements Program (CIP) for budget authorization purposes. This occurred due to the fact that beginning with FY82, the State omitted the capital project line -item from its Operating Budget Certificate Form. In reviewing the situation from a budget control stance, it is preferable to establish a capital project budget annually in addition to the five year CIP, which may be amended/revised should the need arise. In the past, the annual capital project budgets created one major administrative problem. We always attempted to budget for only the project cost expected to occur in each year. As we all know, because capital projects frequently are rescheduled and the timing of construction modified, budget monitoring and control is difficult. To alleviate that problem, I am recommending that each project budget be initially set at the total estimated project cost. Then, at each fiscal year end, any uncompleted projects will have its unspent budget amount carried -over to the next fiscal year's budget. It would then be possible to use the five year CIP as a basis for the annual budget amount of all new projects to be started in the fiscal year. The annual capital project budget would be sent to Council for approval late in July; this would allow for the budget figures to contain both new project budgets plus carry-over project budgets from the prior fiscal year. In addition, a timetable for project completion would be prepared so that project timing information is available to the Council, the staff and the public. The attached budget revisions were prepared based upon the philosophy recommended above. The original estimates are from the FY83-87 CIP. The revisions on the expenditure budgets will provide for the total estimated project cost (if the project was started after July 1, 1982) or the total estimated remaining project cost after June 3D, 1982 (if the project was started prior to July 1, 1982). Those projects with a zero expenditure amount under the Original Estimate column are either projects which are carry-overs from FY82 or are new projects approved since the FY83-FY87 CIP was developed. On the St. Anne Drive Special Assessment project the funding was set at 33% funded by special assessments and 67% from operating revenue pending a final decision by Council. The Wastewater Treatment Plant qi3 J MICROFILI4ED BY I I ---JORM MICR46LAB % CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES i I i 1 i and related sewer improvement project budgets have been reduced to show only cost accumulated to date for design and initial construction; construction cost will be added in the future as final decisions are made. The Rundell/Dearborn/Center Storm Sewer and the Shamrock/Arbor Drive Storm Sewer Projects are shown as being funded by G.O. Bonds since project approval and the funding decisions are also not yet finalized. The budget can be revised in the future as necessary for a change in funding source and/or total estimated project cost. Any unused portion of these budgets at year end (6-30-83) will be carried -over to FY84. As stated above, we will submit a FY84 Capital Project Budget to Council for approval late in July, 1983. This will allow for firm budget amounts early in the fiscal year. I request that you review the attached FY83 Budget and bring any questions to the May 9, 1983, informal Council meeting. The resolution approving this budget will appear on the May 24, 1983, agenda. bc4/4 i i i i i I 9�3 I, v 111CROFILMED BY -J 0 R M._' MI C R;LAB` --- 1 ' ; CEDAR RAPIDS DES i-0DI HES CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND RECEIPTS & EXPENDITURES FY83 BUDGET STREET & TRAFFIC CONTROL CONSTRUCTION ORIGINAL ESTIMATE 5 BEGINNING BALANCE RECEIPTS: G.O. Bonds: First Avenue Sidewalk -Bikeway 37,000 East-West Bikeway Corridor 12,345 City Plaza I -- Highway 1 500,000 Rocky Shore Drive Bikeway 100,000 Railroad Crossing -- Dubuque St. -Washington to Iowa 130,000 CBD Alley 40,000 Linn Street 275,000 Benton/Riverside Intersection -- Total G.O. Bonds 1,094,345 State Aid: 462,047 Benton/Riverside Intersection -- Hwy. 6/Fairmeadows Signals 15,250 Total State Aid 15,250 Operating Revenue: Hwy. 6/Fairmeadows Signals 15,250 Kimball Rd. Curb & Sidewalk 14,500 St. Anne Drive -- Total Operating Revenue 29,750 Special Assessment: St. Anne Drive 95,000 Alley Paving -Lyon's Addition -- Total Special Assessment 95,000 Road Use Tax: Extra Width Paving-Bryn:Mawr Hgts. -- TOTAL RECEIPTS 1,234,345 REVISIONS 5 (37,000) (12,345) 117 (167,823) 7,000 90,962 80,000 23,309 (47,000) 231,186 168,406 231,186 231,186 12,300 69,202 81,502 (60,399) 64,000 3,601 19,933 504,628 FY83 BUDGET 380,903 --117 332,177 107,000 90,962 210,000 63,309 228,000 231,186 1,262,751 231,186 15,250 246,436 15,250 26,800 69,202 111,252 34,601 64,000 98,601 19,933 1,738,973 EXPENDITURES: First Avenue Sidewalk -Bikeway 37,000 12,345 (37,000) (12,345 -- East-West Bikeway 500,000 (183,624) 316,376 Highway 1 Rocky Shore Drive Bikeway 100,000 7,000 80,000 107,000 210,000 Dubuque St. -Washington to Iowa 130,000 40,000 23,309 63,309 CBD Alley 275, 000 (47,429) 227,571 Linn Street Benton/Riverside Intersection -- 462,047 462,047 3 1 I MICROFILMED BY r I-"JOR M -MIC R(Ld B CEDAR RAPIDS - DES MDMES 71-2 Jj - ORIGINAL I FY83 ESTIMATE REVISIONS BUDGET i Hwy. 6/Fairmeadows Signals 30,500 -- 30,500 Kimball Rd. Curb & Sidewalk 14,500 12,300 26,800 St. Anne Drive 95,000 8,803 103,803 Alley Paving -Lyon's Addition -- 64,000 64,000 Extra Width Paving -- 19,933 19,933 City Plaza I -- 105,310 105,310 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 1 234,345 502,304 1,736,649 BALANCE ADJUSTMENTS: Scott Boulevard I 233,035) ENDING BALANCE 150,192 i CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND RECEIPTS & EXPENDITURES FY83 BUDGET BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION BEGINNING BALANCE RECEIPTS: G.O. Bonds: Benton Street Bridge Iowa Avenue Bridge Burlington Street Bridge Camp Cardinal Road Bridge Total G.O. Bonds Federal Aid: ,Iowa Avenue Bridge Burlington Street Bridge Total Federal Aid State Aid: Camp Cardinal Road Bridge Total State Aid TOTAL RECEIPTS EXPENDITURES: I City Bridges Benton Street Bridge Iowa Avenue Bridge Burlington Street Bridge Camp Cardinal Road Bridge TOTAL EXPENDITURES ENDING BALANCE ORIGINAL ESTIMATE S 75,000 88,000 70,000 233,000 200,000 200,000 433,000 75,000 88,000 270,000 433,000 5 REVISIONS 5 53,800 709,800 454,500 30,000 1,248,100 500,000 500,000 1,000,000 18,300 18,300 2,266,400 343 53,800 1,209,800 954,500 48,300 2,266,743 i 1IC1O1ILME1 BY -:1ORM-MICR6LA13, CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES I FY83 BUDGET S 66,244 53,800 784,800 542,500 100,000 1,481,100 500,000 500,000 1,000,000 218,300 218,300 2,699,400 343 53,800 1,284,800 1,042,500 318,300 2,699,743 65,901 913 J CAPITAL PROJECTS RECEIPTS & EXPENDITURES FY83 BUDGET PARKING IMPROVEMENTS BEGINNING BALANCE RECEIPTS: Operating Revenue: Parking Lot Improvements TOTAL RECEIPTS EXPENDITURES: Parking Facility M2 Parking Lot Improvements TOTAL EXPENDITURES ENDING BALANCE HUMAN DEVELOPMENT BEGINNING BALANCE RECEIPTS: Operating Revenue: New Library & Conversion TOTAL RECEIPTS EXPENDITURES: New Library & Conversion TOTAL EXPENDITURES ENDING BALANCE 9 ORIGINAL ESTIMATE $ I r MICROFILMED BY r 1' ' JORM -MICR( L"AB'- - CEDAR RAPIDS DES MOMES I REVISIONS $ 195,797 195,797 6,428 195,797 202,225 155,075 155,075 81,352 81, 352 FY83 BUDGET 49,666 195,797 195,797 6,428 195,797 202,225 43,238 (73,723) 155,075 155,075 81,352 81,352 ;r i• CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND RECEIPTS & EXPENDITURES FY83 BUDGET POLLUTION CONTROL IMPROVEMENTS ORIGINAL FY83 ESTIMATE REVISIONS BUDGET $ $ $ BEGINNING BALANCE 536,167 RECEIPTS: Federal Aid: _ River Corridor Trunk Sewer -- 5,698 5,698 Southeast Interceptor Sewer -- 186,724 186,724 Benton Street Sewer 400,000 (400,000) -- Sewer System Rehab -- 8,861 8,861 Wastewater Treatment Facility 3,750,000 (3,005,358) 744,642 Outfall Sewer to Plant -- 23,794 23,794 Total Federal Aid 4,150,000 (3,180,281) 969,719 I State Aid: Wastewater Treatment Facility 1,000,000 (11000,000 -- j Operating Revenue: East Side Sewer Elimination 177,000 (23,000) 154,000 ! Southwest Interceptor Sewer 99,500 15,850 115,350 Ralston Creek Relocation -- 40,565 40,565 Prairie DuChien Trunk Sewer 2,500 2,500) -- Total Operating Revenue 279,000 30,915 309,915 G.O. Bonds: Wastewater Treatment Facility 250,000 (250,000) -- Storm Sewer -Rundell & Dearborn -- 255,000 255,000 I Shamrock Storm Sewer -- 215,000 215,000 Total G.O. Bonds 250,000 220,000 470,000 Road Use Tax: Dodge/Ralston Creek Sewer Repair 10,500 12,600 23,100 TOTAL RECEIPTS5,689,500 (3 916766) 1,772,734 EXPENDITURES: River Corridor Trunk Sewer - 5,698 5,698 Southeast Interceptor Sewer -- 186,724 186,724 Benton Street Sewer 400,000 (400,000) -- Sewer System Rehab -- 8,861 8,861 Wastewater Treatment Facility 5,000,000 (4,546,014) 453,986 Outfall Sewer to Plant -- 23,794 23,794 East Side Sewer Elimination 177,000 (23,000) 154,000 Southwest Intersecptor Sewer 99,500 15,850 115,350 Ralston Creek Relocation -- 5,456 5,456 Dodge/Ralston Storm Sewer Repair 10,500 12,600 23,100 Prairie DuChien Trunk Sewer 2,500 (2,500) -- 7 9�,3 -.JOR'M HO MICROLAE3_ FILMED BY Ai �1 % CEDAR RAPIDS • DES HOMES ' r ! r ; CAPITAL PROJECTS RECEIPTS & EXPENDITURES FY83 BUDGET OTHER CONSTRUCTION ORIGINAL FY83 ESTIMATE REVISIONS BUDGET 5 5 5 BEGINNING BALANCE (901,853) RECEIPTS: GO Bonds: North Branch Detention 120,000 887,865 1,007,865 T -Hangars -- 81,988 81,988 Total G.O. Bonds 120,000 969,853 1,089,853 Revenue Sharing: ' Civic Center -HVAC -- 10,420 10,420 Civic Center -Roof Repair -- 6,597 6,597 Total Revenue Sharing -- 17,017 17,017 j i Federal Aid: Transit Facility 1,600,000 751,975 2,351_975 Accessible Vans 34,816 (34,816) Bus Shelters -- 3,400 3,400 Bus Acquisition -- 948,227 948,227 i Total Federal Aid 1,634,816 1,668,786 3,303,602 i State Aid: Accessible Vans 4,352 (4,352) -- Bus Acquisition -- 49,918 49,918 Total State Aid 4,352 45,566 49,918 j Operating Revenue: Accessible Vans 4,352 (4,352) -- Transit Facility 400,000 187,994 587,994 Bus Acquisition -- 39,352 39,352 Salt Storage Building -- 55,000 55,000 Total Operating Revenue 404,352 277,994 682,346 Home & Community Dev. Act: North Branch Detention 546,000 (546,000) -- Public Housing Sites 75,000 (75,000) -- Total Home & Comm. Dev. Act 621,000 (621,000) TOTAL RECEIPTS 2,784,520 2,358,216 5,142,736 � 9 9/3 1 "JORM -MICR6LA13 L% CEDAR RARIDS • DES Id0I4[S A ORIGINAL FY83 ESTIMATE REVISIONS BUDGET EXPENDITURES: North Branch Detention 666,000 (478,000) 188,000 Civic Center -HVAC -- 10,420 10,420 Civic Center -Roof Repair - 6,597 6,597 Transit Facility 2,000,000 939,969 2,939,969 Accessible Vans 43,520 (43,520) -- Bus Shelters -- 3,400 3,400 Bus Acquisition -- 1,037,497 1,037,497 Public Housing Sites 75,000 (75,000) -- Salt Storage Building -- 55,000 55,000 - - - TOTAL EXPENDITURES 2,784,520 1,456,363 4,240,883 I ENDING BALANCE -- j j GRAND TOTAL RECEIPTS 10,141,365 1,563,350 11,704,715 I i GRAND TOTAL EXPENDITURES 10,141,365 266,456 10,407,821 . i i I 10 9/3 I �, •__� i IAILRDFIU" BY 1"-"JORM--MICS14LA01 1 CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES i / City of Iowa City MEMORANDUM Date: May 5, 1983 To: City Council and City Manager From: Rosemary Vitosh, Director of Finance Re: FY84 Capital Projects Schedule The attached schedule was prepared by Frank Farmer, City Engineer, as a status report on estimated costs and the timing of capital projects now in progress and/or new capital projects scheduled to begin within the next fourteen months. It packs a great deal of information into a summary format and should be helpful to both Council and staff in reviewing the status of capital projects. Periodic updates will be done as needed in the future. I ask that you review the schedule at this time, concentrating primarily on the timing of the projects as final decisions are still needed on several of those projects. The schedule is broken down into four sections: (1) FY83 projects (page 1), (2) FY84 projects as per the FY84-88 CIP (page 2-4), (3) Pending projects listed in the FY84-88 CIP (page 5) (4) Other projects not included in the CIP (page 6). My notes on CIP project approval indicate that the following FY84 projects still need final approval for the timing and/or for the funding source: Page 1: St. Anne Drive Improvement Page 2: Melrose Court Improvements Dubuque Street - Iowa Avenue to Park Road Foster Road Right-of-way East Foster Road Right -of -Way West Page 3: Villa Park Sidewalk Mercer Park Sidewalk Willow Park Sidewalk Page 4: Linn Street Improvement T -Hangars Storm Sewer-Rundell/Dearborn/Center East Side Trunk Sewer Elimination Page 6: Shamrock/Arbor Drive Storm Sewer Hwy. 1 Widening All other projects on pages 1-4 are scheduled to proceed in accordance with the estimated time schedule listed. At the May 9, 1983, informal meeting I ask that the Council be prepared to indicate any problems they find with the estimated time schedules in addition to discussing the projects listed above in order to reach a consensus on whether or not to proceed with these projects within FY84, the timing of the projects and/or the funding source for the project. bc4/5 i MICROFILM BY l - DORM .MIC R6LA13 T CEDAR RAPIDS • DEA I 9/140-1 J J i i -'- PROJECT TITLE Estimated Design Cost Estimated Start of Design Estimated Construction Cost Estimated lime of Construction Estimated Inspection Cost Total Cost FY83 1. Kimball Road Curb & Sidewalk 2. St. Anne Drive Improvements 3. North Branch Detention $700 IN $4,800 IN -- Design Complete Design Complete Design Complete $25,400 $96,003 $597,000 July -September 1983 July -September 1983 Complete 1983by June 15, $700 IN $3000 IN oBOContractnCng 0 103.8 $103,003 $ -' Structure 4. Camp Cardinal Road Bridge $23,300 C 75% $250,000 $20,000 ROW October 1903 thru June 1984 $25,000 C $318,300 5. Southwest Interceptor Sewer f4 ,000 IN Design Complete $109,000 March, completeMy 1983 50% $2,000 IN $115,350 Repair Project 6. Dodge Street/Creek Storm $1,000 Ili Design Complete $21,000 May 1983 (1,300 IN $23,100 Sewer Repair 7. Dubuque Street - Iowa to Washington $8,000 111 Design Complete (200,000 198June, t 3 Bids taken March 31, 1983 $4,000 IN $210,000 B. CBD Alley Project -" Complete $5,000 remaining on current contract Completion of project dependent upon Iowa - Illinois transition from overhead to underground. Schedule for completion by July 1, 1983. ROW - Right -of -Way f Estimated III - In-liouse C - Consultant 1 141CROFIL14ED BY _DORM._ MICR6LAEi_ I CEDAR RAPIDS • DES 1401YE5 I /� L Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Time Estimated Total PROJECT TITLE Design Cost Start of Design Construction Cost of Construction Inspection Cost Cost FY84 1. Benton/Riverside Intersection by IDOT By IDOT $254,532 April thru Aug. 1983 BY IDOT $462,402 April Letting $207,870 ROW April Letting 50% City 50% IDOT Billing after completion of project 2. 1st Avenue Culvert $8,000 C Consultant under $214,000 June thru Oct. 1984 $4,000 111 $226,000 contract by Feb. May Letting 1, 1984. February thru April 1984 3. Railroad Crossing Improvements By Crandic By Crandic $60,000 construc- July, Aug., Sept. $2,000 111 $62,000 Crandic Line, at Dubuque, Complete Agreements tion by Crandic and Oct. 1983. $22,000 -City Clinton 8 Madison to Council May 1983 $20,000-Crandic $20,000 -State 4. Melrose Court Improvements $4,000 IN November 1983 to $80,000 May, June 6 July $2,000 IN $86,000 March 1984 if 1984 If Council Council approves approves Project. Project. April 1984 Letting 5. Alley Paving - Lyon's Addition $2,500 IN April -July 1983 $60,000 August thru October $1,500 IM $64,000 1983. July letting Assessment 1983 6. Dubuque Street -Iowa Avenue to $10,000 111 July 1983 thru $575,000 May thru August 1984 $6,000 111 $591,000 Park Road March 1984 April 1984 Letting FADS Funding 7. Extra Width Paving By Consultant -- City's share August 1984 -- $43,000 Keokuk/Sandusky $35,000 Boyrum-$8,000 August 1983 8. Foster Road ROW East During FY84 by $30,000 ROW $30,000 Planning 9. Foster Road ROW West During FY84 by $10,000 ROW $10,000 Planning. T 3 I � � i MICROFILRFG BY l.. —DORM-"MICR6LAE3- CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES I I J Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Time Estimated Total PROJECT TITLE Design Cost Start of Design Construction Cost of Construction Inspection Cost Cost 10. Iowa Avenue Bridge $75,800 C Consultant under $1,144,000 Jan. 1984 thru Nov. $65,000 C $1,284,800 contract. 85% 1984. If Federal $500,000 by complete. Complete funding becomes Federal funding. by July 1983. available. 11. Burlington Street Bridge $76,500 C Consultant under $901,000 Dec. 1984 thru Nov. $65,000 C $1,042,500 , contract. 22% 1985. If Federal $500,000 by complete. Complete funding becomes Federal funding. by July 1983. available. 12. Benton Street Bridge $5,800 C Consultant under $45,000 May June E July 1983 $3,000 IN $53,800 contract. Design Letting. complete by May 1983. 13. Rocky Shore Bikeway $4,000 IN Design 85% $100,000 June thru Oct. 1983, $3,000 IN $107,000 complete. Complete by July 1983. 14. North Dodge St. Sidewalk $2,000 IN April 1983 thru $26,350 August thru Oct. 1983 $1,500 IN $29,850 Budgeted under by Planning June 1983. July July Letting CUBG Funding CDBG funds Letting 15. Villa Park Sidewalks $500 IN June 6 July 1983 $5,700 111 August, September, d $500 IM $6,700 Slaking by Construction by October 1983. By Engineering. City Park crews Park crews. as time allows. 16. Mercer Park Sidewalks $500 IN June S July 1983 $10,000 IN August, September 6 $500 Ili $11,000 Staking by Construction by October 1983, By Engineering. City Park crews Park crews. as time allows. 17. Willow Park Sidewalk $500 111 June L July 1984 $33,000 August, September 6 $500 IN $34,000 Staking by Construction by October 1984. By Engineering. City Park crews Park crews. as time allows. 18. Clinton Street Improvements $8,000 IN Sept. thru Dec. $128,000 June, July b August $4,000 IN $140,000 1983 1984 3 I � � i MICROFILRFG BY l.. —DORM-"MICR6LAE3- CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES I I J I PROJECT TITLE Estimated Design Cost Estimated Start of Design Estimated Construction Cost Estimated Time of Construction• 19. Linn Street Improvements $8,000 IH Design complete $206,000 July, August & Sept. by June 1, 1983. 1983. June letting 75% complete. 20. Blackhawk Mini -Park $4,000 C Dependent upon $67,000 Dependent upon Hotel I Hotel development, development. 21. Napoleon Park Restrooms Staking by Plans drawn by $20,000 July, August & Oct. Engineering Engineering. 1983. By City Park Division. Complete crews. 22. Bus Fleet Expansion/ Dependent on $900,000 Replacement Federal funding. 23. Salt Storage Building $2,500 IN April, May & June $50,000 July & August 1983. 1983 1983. Letting in late June 1983. 24. Old Transit Garage Dependent on $100,000 completion of Property new Transit Acqusition Facility. 25. T-Ilangars Dependent on $120,000 iapproval by FAA. 26. Storm Sewer-Rundell/Dearborn/ $ 8,000 C Consultant under $234,000 August, September Center $ 6,000 IN contract by May 1, October, November 1983. May, June 1983. Letting in • & July 1983 late July. I 27. East Side Trunk Sewer Elimination $10,000 C July to Dec. 1983 $140,000 April, May & June 1983 1984 I 28. New Transit facility$124,158 Complete P $2,790,811 April 1983 to July 1984 IN - In -(louse $ Estimated C - Consultant ROW - Rlght-of-Way I� a i i 141CII11LI11111 I t" JORM-MICROLAB- -� CEDAR RAPIDS DES MOINES I Estimated Total Inspection Cost Cost $4,000 IN $228,000 $4,000 IN $75,000 By Building $20,000 Inspection. $2,500 IN $7,000 IN $4,000 IN $25,000 IN $900,000 $55,000 5100,000 $120,000 $255,000 $154,000 $2,939,969 U )j1 1 Estimated Estimated Estimated PROJECT TITLE Design Cost Start of Design Construction Cost . Other Projects i 1. "FY84 Asphalt Overlay Program $3,000 IH April, May d June $294,000 1983 2. ""Shamrock/Arbor Drive Storm $10,000 IN To be determined $200,000 Sewer Project by Council 3. "Highway 01 Widening - Governor to Dubuque Road at Hy -Vee 4. ""Ventura/Tanglewood $30,079 July 1 - Dec. 13 $109,903 1983 "Not a Capitol Improvement Project, funding included in Street Department Budget. "Not included in FY84 Capitol Improvement Projects as approved by Council. 6 NICROFILNED BY L '"JORM"" MICR6L:AI3' 1 CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES r i City of Iowa City MEMORANDUM Date: May 3, 1983 To: Honorable Mayor and City Council AV (� From: Rosemary Vitosh, Director of Finance 1"" Re: Landfill Charge Accounts As of March 1, 1983, 71% ($43,114) of the total landfill accounts receivable ($60,779) was owed by four accounts. $30,650 of the $43,114 was thirty (30) days or more past due. By allowing such delinquencies, the City is, in effect, providing cash flow for these accounts. In an effort to step up the collection process for these outstanding landfill accounts, we intend to implement three major changes in the collection procedures. 1. Apply a service charge of lh% per month on all amounts greater than 30 days in arrears. 2. Charging privileges will be revoked when an account is 45 days in arrears. The account balance must be paid in full before charging privileges will be resumed. 3. Following the second revocation of charging privileges, a deposit will be required, equivalent to one and one-half the individual's average monthly dumping fees, in order to resume charging privileges. These new procedures will lessen the financial burden on the landfill operation and provide an incentive to our customers to keep their accounts current. The City Manager is authorized by City ordinance to make changes in the landfill collection procedure. We wiill proceed with these collection procedures unless you direct us otherwise. bj2/1 City of Iowa City 'MEMORANDUM Date: April 28, 1983 To: Neal Berlin and City Council From: Chuck Schmadeke (.1/. Re: Iowa Avenue and Burlington Street Bridges over the Iowa River The Engineering Division has been seeking funds through the Federal -Aid Bridge Improvement Program for the major renovation of the Iowa Avenue and Burlington Street (serving eastbound traffic) bridges over the Iowa River. To receive funding, municipalities throughout the state must propose bridge project candidates to the Iowa Department of Transportation (IDOT). After July 31 of each year, the IDOT develops a priority listing of proposed candidates and some time in November the IDOT will offer funding for those candidates which qualify. With the new five cent gas tax, the funding level has increased to $3 million. According to the IDOT, in order for a municipality to receive the funding as offered, the City must let construction contracts on their particular project(s) during the year after the offer is made; otherwise, the funding offer will be withdrawn. Assuming the IDOT offers $3 million this fall to municipalities for bridge projects and assuming that no other bridges are ranked above the Iowa Avenue and Burlington Street bridges in the IDOT's new priority listing which will be developed after July 31 of this year, it appears the IDOT will offer funding to the City of Iowa City for construction of both bridge projects. On the IDOT's current priority listing, the Iowa Avenue bridge ranks just above the Burlington Street bridge. Construction of each project is estimated to take from 10 to 12 months. The Engineering staff will work with the IDOT to ensure that one bridge will always remain open to traffic if the bridges are funded together. This can be accomplished by letting a contract in early 1984 for the construction of the Iowa 'Avenue bridge, and letting a contract in late 1984 for the construction of the Burlington Street bridge with the stipulation that any work that would disrupt the flow of traffic cannot begin until after the Iowa Avenue bridge is reopened to traffic. bdw1/5 r- i MICROFILMED BY 1 JORMMICROL CEDAR RAPIDS DES 1 -A M01'VES i I 9/4/ City of Iowa City MEMORANDUM Date: May 6, 1983 To: City Council From: Don Schmeiser, Director of Planning & Program Development Re: Lower Ralston Creek Property - Project HOPE Facility Pursuant to the May 2 informal City Council discussion of this subject, PPD and Legal staffs have reviewed the matter of land valuation and the scheduling of bids to sell the parcel of land located at Harrison and Linn streets in the Lower Ralston Creek Area (Parcel D). The intended use of this parcel would be a Project HOPE facility or a similar institution. Land Valuation: The subject property was appraised in November 1982 at $64,000. It contains approximately 21,736 square feet including the area between the top of the creek bank and the center of the creek. In our judgment, the value of the subject property could be reduced because of the following restrictions (not considered in the original appraisal) which would be imposed on any prospective development: 1. The amount of fill required to raise the first floor elevation to the present 100 year flood level (1.5-2.5 feet). 2. The reservation of a 20 foot wide conservation easement. 3. The limitation of use to an "institution," as defined in the current zoning ordinance. Based on these considerations, the property might reasonably be valued at $45,000-$50,000. Bid Scheduling: If it is the Council's wish to sell Parcel D at this time, it is feasible to accomplish the following course of action by July 19. The proposed timetable provides for concurrent bidding and notice of conveyance periods. It assumes that no additional land area is needed to accommodate Project HOPE or another institution. (An additional 6,015 square feet could be gained by the vacation of 15 feet of right-of-way along Harrison and Linn streets.) May 24 City Council authorizes the solicitation of offers and sets a public hearing for July 5, 1983, on the proposed sale and conveyance of Parcel 0 for private redevelopment and directs that public notices of same be published. May 28 City Clerk publishes notices of public hearing and request to receive proposals for redevelopment. I i I4ICROEILMED BY JORM MICROLAB* CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MONE5 I J I _. City of Iowa City MEMORANDUM Date: May 5, 1983 To: City Council From: Doug Boothroy, Senior Planne Re: Development of Nine Acres at Corner of Scott Boulevard and Muscatine Avenue The owner of property on the southwest quadrant of the intersection of Scott Boulevard and Muscatine Avenue came before the Planning and Zoning Commission informally on April 18, 1983, to present a development sketch for the Commission's preliminary review. The discussion centered on the sewer issues involved. It was pointed out that the gravity flow sewer proposed would feed into the "horseshoe" system downstream and potentially add to the wet -weather surcharge problem. Approval of any subdivision in the area, whether served by gravity flow or by a lift station, would ignore the surcharge conditions in the Rundell Street Trunk. The Commission indicated to the owner and the developer of the property that the Commission was eager to have a clear policy statement from the Council regarding the position the City should take on any development proposals for properties whose sewerage entered the "horseshoe" system. Until such a policy was stated, the Commission would not look favorably on any development in the area. Their position was based upon the development sequence and the statements regarding sewer issues on the east side in the 1983 Comprehensive Plan Land Use Update. Previous discussions of the Council have dealt with development on the east side generally, regardless of the mode of collection (gravity or lift), and with the specifics of the BDI/Village Green lift station questions. The nine acre gravity flow development in question falls within the general discussion of whether or not further development on the east side should occur at all prior to solution of the "horseshoe" collection problem. It is totally independent of any capacity questions in the lift stations. Attached to this memo are documents which have been discussed by the Council previously: memos dated July 20 and August 5, 1982, explaining pertinent agreements and localized trunk line capacities serving Village Green and BDI and outlining a policy for development; a resolution drafted in response to a directive from Council August 5, 1982; minutes of the July 26 and August 5, 1983 Council meetings; and excerpts from the Comprehensive Plan Update related to east side.development issues. Applicable policies which the Council has adopted to date are those included within the 1983 Comprehensive Plan Land Use Update. The relevant pages have been excerpted, highlighted, and are attached. bdw4/1-2 Attachment nlcRor ILMED BY 11 `JORM-MICROLAB- CEDAR RAPIDS • DES 610IYES i 9rlf J 8 DEVELOPMEi REQUEST AREA r T-EA!T )Atop, !Ittl MERCER II GRAVITY LINE TO LOWER MUSCATINE TRUNK II 7 T E., IAF -RC L 68m, • SliTLLLN GLO%! HP Sma" Co `f 1. fir./ \ r`I MICROFILMED BY -.-JORM -MICR6LAB CEDAR RAPIDS - DES MOVIES. City of Iowa City MEMORANDUM Date: July 20, 1982 To: City Council From: Doug Boothroy, Senior Planne Re: Development Options Relating t04Sewer Capacity in the East and Northeast Areas At the Council's July 12th meeting, discussion of proposed development policies for the East side of Iowa City centered on the capacity for development in the area, given certain constraints in the sewer system and given certain past agreements between private entities and the city for the use of a lift station in the area. The Council expressed concern, during the meeting, for the surcharge problems in the Rundell Street Trunk as well as for the potential industrial and residential development needs of the area. Two questions were posed: 1. Should wet -weather surcharge conditions in the Rundell Street Trunk continue to be tolerated, and 2. If so, and some development on the East side is permitted by the Council, should the remaining capacity in one portion of the sewer system be allocated on a "first come, first served" basis or should prior agreements, which effectively allocate capacity in the system, be the determining factor? Outlined below is a brief history of the relevant agreements, and alternative development policies based on conditions in the Rundell Street Trunk. AGREEMENTS BDI and the City. In 1971, the City entered into an agreement with Business Development Incorporated (BDI) for the construction of the Heinz lift station. This agreement provided for, among other things, the construction of a 200 GPM lift station to be paid for, in part, by BDI. As part of the agreement, the City contracted to provide BDI with the usage of 100 GPM of the anticipated flow (Section 4.d). The agreement further states that it is the understanding of both parties that the ultimate design capacity of the station will be 1,000 GPM and that "...this capacity is contemplated to be divided on the basis of 450 GPM to the BDI property and the balance to other property." (RES. No. 71-463, Section 15) Village Green and the City. With application for approval of the final plan for Village Green South Part lI in 1979, the issue of capacity in the Lower Muscatine Trunk precipitated an agreement between the City and Village Green South, MICRO(ILMED M IlI JORM-MICROLAB i CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOVIES I i J J Incorporated for the provision of a sewage detention facility. The design of the facility and the agreement were drawn up with the understanding that approximately 450 GPM of the available 500 GPM capacity in the Lower Muscatine Trunk was allocated to BDI. The City required provisions in the subdivider's agreement for a detention facility in anticipation of potential capacity problems in the Lower Muscatine Trunk. These problems were anticipated in the event that BOI properties were to fully develop prior to construction of the Water Pollution Control Plant and the Southeast Interceptor Sewer. The facility was to be built at such time as the City felt it was necessary, and would be paid for by the developer from an escrow account. To date, the City has not required construction and the facility has not been built. Village Green currently uses 140 GPM and BOI 30 GPM of the available 500 GPM in the Lower Muscatine Trunk. 80I and Private Interests. A subsequent purchase agreement between BDI and Oscar Meyer provided for an approximate flowage of 300 GPM capacity through the Heinz lift station to service the Oscar Meyer plant. The possibility for accommodating this flowage requirement was based on an upgrading of the Heinz lift station to 450 GPM in 1981. Plum Grove Acres, Inc. and the City In conjunction with acquisition of a flowage easement for the North Branch dam stormwater detention facility, the City agreed to install a 21 inch sanitary sewer line from the Northeast Trunk sewer to within 60 feet of the Plum Grove Acres' property. This sewer will be extended at such time as Plum Grove Acres decides to develop its lands lying north and south of Ralston Creek and the plans for that development are approved through normal procedures. There is no requirement that the City approve such Plans in the agreement, however, it appears that the agreement was made with the understanding that development could proceed at the developer's discretion, provided all state and local regulations were met. Sewer service from this area would tie into the "horseshoe" system immediately downstream from the Rundell Street Trunk. ALTERNATIVE DEVELOPMENT POLICIES The following development alternatives for the East and Northeast areas accept the condition of the present sewage treatment plant as a given; this is not an attempt to address the capacity issues in the plant at this time. Further, it is recognized that during wet weather the "horseshoe" trunk, of which the Rundell Street Trunk is a part, surcharges and this surcharge condition effects flowage within connecting trunks upstream from the "horseshoe" system. Both the Lower Muscatine Trunk, serving the east area south of Muscatine Avenue, and the Southeast Trunk, serving the east area north of Muscatine, are upstream from the "horseshoe" and are effected to some degree by the downstream surcharge condition. The alternatives presented are intended to provide various options for development prior to construction of the new plant, the relief sewer and MICROFILMED BY i JORM-MIC R46L AB CEDAR RAPIDS • BES '4018ES 9/ p ,=dC=Vl 3 other concurrent capital improvements. Two distinct policies serve as a basis for the development options: 1. That wet -weather surcharge conditions in the Rundell Street Trunk will be tolerated in anticipation of a solution to the problem within ten years, or 2. That wet -weather surcharge conditions will not be tolerated or tolerated only to a limited degree. The development alternatives are presented in an order of increasing restrictiveness. PglicV No. 1: Toleration of surcharge conditions in the Rundell Street Trunk. Alternatives: A. Allow full development in the entire East and Northeast areas on a first come, first served basis with development south of j Muscatine being ultimately constrained by capacity in the Lower I Muscatine Trunk. i S. Allow full development of the entire area, with development south of Muscatine being governed by a policy which gives priority consideration to the SDI properties covered by the j 1971 agreement and which requires any other development to provide alternative systems for wet -weather conditions, as dictated by capacity within the Lower Muscatine Trunk. There is i some question however, whether the City can legally discriminate in favor of certain property owners. C. Allow full development of the entire area, with development south of Muscatine being allocated on a percentage basis according to the format of the 801 agreement (1971), with 45% of the Lower Muscatine Trunk capacity allocated to DDI and 55% a•ilocated to other users as determined by the City. D. Allow full development of the entire area and decrease the potential for excessive surcharge problems in the Lower Muscatine Trunk by facilitating diversion of the Village Green lift station flowage to the Heinz lift station thereby decreasing the maximum output to the Trunk to 450 GPM.' Policy No. 2: Limited to no toleration of surcharge conditions in the Rundell Street Trunk. Alternatives: A. Allow development of all platted properties, plus any new development proposals which fall within the capacity i MICROFILMED BY 1 '-DORM MICROLAB j CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES 9/f J 4 allocations of the BDI agreement and the Plum Grove Acres agreement. B. Allow development of only those properties which have already been platted and which have received final development j approval. C. Full development with either the public or private provision of alternative waste management systems that may or may not eventually feed into the municipal system. 0. Allow no further development until such time as the surcharge problems in the Rundell Street Trunk can be rectified. . "Both the Village Green and Heinz lift stations are currently operating at less than optimum conditions. A lift station pumps at a given gpm regardless of incoming flows and will hold sewage until that gpm is 1 reached, thus creating a condition of erratic flows to the main trunk. The Village Green station pumps at 180 gpm and has an incoming flowage of 140 gpm and the Heinz station pumps at 450 gpm with an incoming flowage of 30 gpm. If both stations pump simultaneously, the demand on the Lower Muscatine Trunk is 630 gpm. Diverting the Village Green flowage of 140 gpm to the Heinz station would use the pump capacity of 450 gpm more efficiently, eliminate one lift station, and decrease the maximum y expectable flowage to the Lower Muscatine Trunk. I cc: Neal Berlin Robert Jansen Chuck Schmadeke Don Schmeiser bdw5/1-3 i IAICROFI LIdED BY � j `1 I -"DORM -"MIC Rfi/LAB- �I CEDAR RAPIDS DES MOINESj I I Potential flow demands from Village Green and BDI to Lower Muscatine Trunk Village Green - current usage 140 gpm development of unplatted acreage (lift and gravity) 411 gpm Total demand 551 gpm BDI - current usage 30 gpm agmt. with Oscar Meyer 300 gpm remaining allocation 120 gpm Total demand 450 gpm Total potential flow demand 1001 gpm Total demand with existing lift stations - - Village Green 180 gpm - Heinz 450 gpm 630 gpm Lower Muscatine Trunk capacity 500 gpm ear MICROFILMED BY - 1 I 'DORM"MICR<LA B % CEDAR RAPIDS DES MOINES II JI i INFORMAL COUNCIL DISCUSSION JULY 26, 1982 INFORMAL COUNCIL DISCUSSION: July 26, 1982, 7:On P.M. in the Conference Room at the Civic Center. Councilman Balmer chairing the meeting. COUNCILMEMBERS PRESENT: Dickson, McDonald, Balmer, Erdahl. Absent: Lynch, Neuhauser, Perret. Staffinembers present: Berlin, StoIfus, Boothroy. Jansen, Franklin, Schmeiser, Myhre. TAPE-RECORDED on Reel ..182-15, Side 2, 1162 -End, and Reel=82-16, Side 1, 1-357. Balmer stated that as only four Councilmembers.were present, the meeting would be more for information than making decisions. SEWER CAPACITY/EAST AND NORTHEAST AREAS 1162-2180 Boothroy called attention to his memo regarding questions raised in previous area study discussions. Agreements with B.D.I., Village Green and Plum Grove Acres were summarized and present flow useage outlined. B.D.I.'s sale of property to Oscar Meyer included the sewer capacity. Alternative development policies regarding surcharge conditions in the Rundell Street Trunk are out- lined in the memo. It was pointed out that the proposed Highlander/Westing- house Lift Station will ultimately dump into the Rundell St. Sewer at it's intersection at Jefferson Street. Boothroy commented on the proposed Prairie du Chien sewer which would replace three other lift stations and pump into the • River Corridor system, paid for by assessment of the area. The City's policy on lift stations was noted. Alternatives for Policy .41, toleration of sur- charge conditions in Rundell St. Sewer discussed. Regarding the B.D.I. 1971 agreement, City Attorney Jansen advised that the City was not in a position to challenge the assumption that guarantee of sewer capacity was legal, however there were interpretations regarding capacity which might be changed. The B.D.I. agreement with Wolfe was noted. Policy ;t2, no toleration of surcharge alternatives. Staff will draft a policy statement of specific alternatives that can be implemented Boothroy summarized Council's To insure and aid development in other areas of the City, Capitol Improvement Projects can be planned. Extension of Foster Road by developing at both ends was noted. This area is sewered by the Corridor Sewer. When the 21" sewer has been installed, Glasgow pointed out that this area will be the only area selling lots .on which $150,000 homes can be built. Now people are going out- side the City. He outlined the number of homes that could be built. Schmeiser related a discussion with developer Oakes who says it is more feasible to build North of Interstate 80 with septic tanks on one acre lots because the investment on utilities is less. Staff will complete a sequencing schedule. NORTHEAST AREA REPORT 2180 -End In the map, Figure 1, developable areas, Myhre discussed sewer availability ® for the four areas shown. Designation of the 118A as O.R.P. Zone was noted along with recommendation for change of land use near ACT on the Comprehen- sive Plan. Figure 2, proposed alignment for trafficways. Concept for alignment of First Avenue extended and Scott Boulevard extended pointed out. 1 MICROFILI•IED BY I I` "'JORM MICR6LAE3 1 CEDAR RAPIDS DES 'd01YEs I J 9/P .r& Am City of Iowa,Cit� Date: August 5, 1982 To: City Council From: Doug Buothroy, Senior Planner Re: Development Policy for the East and Northeast Portions of Iowa City Pending Construction of the Water Pollution Control Plant The following policy statement and implementation strategy are presented in response to the Council's request on July 26 for a refinement of the development options outlined for the East and Northeast areas. This policy reflects the Council's concerns that the surcharge problem in the "horseshoe" system be recognized and not exacerbated further, but that development in the East and Northeast areas be allowed to continue to some extent. The statement is designed to serve as a separate statement from the development sequence of the Comprehensive Plan and fulfill a need to address the unique sewer capacity problems of the East and Northeast areas. It is recommended that the Council undertake an annual review of the surcharge problem and proceed with the implementation strategy to ensure that development is not increasing the surcharge problem to an intolerable extent and to ensure compliance with the legal requirements of a staged growth policy. Policy Statement Development of those areas in which the sewers empty into the "horseshoe" trunk system may occur to the extent that surcharge conditions within the "horseshoe" system are minimized. Development will be controlled through the implementation strategy stated below. The City will encourage, as a general policy, the development of areas which will not impact the "horseshoe" system, through capital improvements programming. Implementation Strategy Stage 1: Development may occur on any properties which have received preliminary or final platting approval, and/or which fall within the Business Development, Inc. and Plum Grove Acres, Inc. agreements with the City. South of Muscatine Avenue development may occur as stated above, with the following additional constraints: a. The Village Green and Heinz lift stations shall be timed so as not to pump concurrently and development shall be limited to the existing capacities of the respective lift stations. OR b. The flowage from the Village Green lift station shall be diverted to the Heinz lift station and the capacity within the 1 I ! - I tumor ILnED BY 1 "DORM MICROLAB - I CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES r Heinz lift station shall be allocated proportionally, with 45% of the capacity (202.5 gpm) allocated to SDI and 55% (247.5 gpm) to Village Green. Review of this stage shall take place within one year of the adoption of the policy, and annually thereafter, to determine the status of the surcharge condition in the "horseshoe" system and whether implementation of the policy should advance to stage two. Stage 2: Further development within the policy area shall take place only with the provision of an alternative waste management system by the City. Stage 3: No development shall take place. except with the provision of an approved private waste management system. cc:. Neal Berlin Robert Jansen Chuck Schmadeke Don Schmeiser bj2/12-13 i r MICROFILMED BY -DORM"MIC REAL",49- CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES JI rrr +• ADDITIONAL DEVELOPFIL141' AND ESTIMAIED FLOWAGE TO HORSESHOE SYSTEM UNDER STAGE ONE Dove Iu ml gent Acres Platted or Covered Estimated Additional by Agreements Flowage* BDI (as constrained by 60.8 ac 420 qpm Heinz lift station) 45.4 Village Green 14.6 Iowa City Housing Project 2.86 acres 8.9 gpm 4.9 Waters 1st Addition 1.6 23.4 Oakes Meadow 7.5 Plum Grove Acres c. 100 acres 312 gpm Highlander lift station c. 105 acres 20_ 0 qpm 292.36 acres Additional flowage to"horseshoev'system 1014.6 gpm *Industrial - 10,000 gal./acre/day or 6.9 gal./acre/min. Residential- 300 gal./capita/day or .208 gal./capita/min. (assume 15epeople/ acre d 1 i MICROr ILMED BY "-JORPA MICROLAM A CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MONES INFORMAL COUNCIL DISCUSSION AUGUST 9, 1982 INFORMAL COUNCIL DISCUSSION: August 9, 1982, 7:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers at the Civic Center. Mayor Pro tem Perret presiding. COUNCILMEMBERS PRESENT: Balmer, Lynch, Erdahl, McDonald, Perret, Dickson -7:15 PM. Absent: Neuhauser. Staffinembers present: Helling, Stolfus, Jansen, Franklin, Boothroy, Myhre. TAPE-RECORDED: Reel=82-16, Side 2, 1-1372. Mayor Pro tem Perret advised the group of citizens present that this was an 1-884 informational meeting for Council to hear the presentations and snake comments. After Council discussion, if the audience had questions, they would be answered. EAST AREA DEVELOPMENT POLICY rranklin called attention to the memo outlining the rationale and assumptions for the short-range plan, with no capital improvements, which would not ex- acerbate the sewer problems in the Horseshoe Area. Boothroy pointed out that the second memo, "Development Policy for East and Northeast Portions of Iowa City Pending Construction of the Wastewater Pollution Control Plant", was more specific and summarized the Council's previous discussions. He read he Policy Statement and the Implementation Strategy, three stages. A chart showing estimated flowage into the Horseshoe system to service already com- mitted development under Stage_ 1 was explained. Alternative waste manage- ment systems suggested included: holding areas, satellite treatment plants, and central septic systems. Erdahl questioned if there were any provisions for emergencies in the agree- ments for sewer allocations, so Council could legally be more restrictive. Boothroy commented that this would be a legal decision. Citizens present and Councilmembers commented on the proposal for the Wastewater Pollution Control Plant, on the progress so far on the sewer projects following the Federal mandates, and present problems in the Horseshoe area. Regarding alternatives, Erdahl agreed with Staff's position regarding presenting alternatives to the WPCP, when requesting Federal funding. Boothro uestioned if there was consensus with the policy statement. The Mayor Pro tem noted aqreement, sot ere will e a resolution on the anencla ror adoption or the policy, and a tormal legal opinion will be given on minimizing the commitment in agreements and plats. Lynch suggested a com- mittee be established to work on the economics of what the City can afford. Jim Hynes proposed a 54" line off the SE Interceptor, from Rundell to Scott. with a satellite plant there to treat the sewage, dumping into Snyder Creek. The problem of sump pumps dumping into sewers was discussed and the result of the Inflo-Infiltration Study was commented on. Boothroy noted the study of the Center City area will be the final area study. The preliminary Compre- hensive Plan draft will be to P&Z in September, then public meeinqs and public hearings, and to Council and final adoption in February. PENINSULA AREA STUDY Myhre noted that the issues included traffic -ways (showing Foster Road as a collector), and des' -ion of a neinhbornood commercial center. The 1 MICROFILMED BY 1 1 -"JORM-MICROLA9 CEDAR RAPIDS • DES �401:lES i I 884-1372 91&r J RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION ADOPTING A DEVELOPMENT POLICY FOR THE EAST AND NORTHEAST PORTIONS OF IOWA CITY PENDING CONSTRUCTION OF THE WATER POLLUTION CONTROL PLANT. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Iowa City recognizes that a wet - weather surcharge condition exists in the trunk sewers known as the "horseshoe" trunk, and; WHEREAS, the Council has determined that it may not be in the best interest of the community to exacerbate this surchage condition, and; WHEREAS, certain developments in the east and northeast portions of the city may impact this surcharge condition, and; WHEREAS, the City has made certain commitments to the aforementioned developments. BE IT RESOLVED that the following policy statement and implementation strategy be adopted: Policv Statement Development of those areas in which the sewers empty into the "horseshoe" trunk system may occur to the extent that surcharge conditions within the "horseshoe" system are minimized. Development will be controlled by the implementation strategy stated below. The City will encourage, as a general policy, the development of areas which will not impact the "horseshoe" system, through capital improvements programming. i Implementation Strategy i State 1: Development may occur on any properties which have received prelimi- nary or final platting approval, and/or which fall within the Business Development, Incorporated and Plum Grove Acres, Incorporated agreements with the City. a. South of Muscatine Avenue development shall be limited to the existing capacities of the Village Green and Heinz lift stations. b. Review of this stage shall take place within one year of the. adoption policy, and annually thereafter, to determine the status of the surcharge condition in the "horseshoe" system and whether implementation of the policy should advance to stage two. Stage Z: Further development within the policy area shall take place only with the provision of an alternative waste management system by the City. 7%O 141CROFILMED BY 1. - JORM "MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES M01NES i L- Resolution No. Page 2 Stage 3: No development shall take place except with the provision of an approved private waste management system. It was moved by and seconded by the Resolution be adopted, and upon roll call there were: AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: Balmer _ Dickson Erdahl Lynch McDonald _ Neuhauser Perret Passed and approved this day of 1983. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY CLERK i i MICROFILMED BY 1_ JORM--MICROLAB -� CEDAR RAPIDS DES MOINES � I i r - JI Excerpts 1983 Zona City Comprehensive gZan Land Use Update well into the future. This growth can take place without capital improvements above and beyond those planned for in the Iowa City Sanitary Sewerage System Facility Plan (Veenstra & Kimm, 1979) and without annexation. The Developable Land analysis assumes that some solution to sewer capacity problems will be accomplished within the time frame of this update. The solution may be the construction of the Water Pollution Control Plant and the sewer line improvements noted in the Veenstra and Kimm sewer study (1979). Land which can be developed prior to resolution of the sewer issues with only minimal capital expenditures at this time, and land which will be available for development only after resolution of capacity problems is indicated on Table 1. Two time -frames are used to address the development potential of growth areas. These time -frames are derived from the estimated completion date of the WPCP, with a pre-WPCP time -frame of 7-10 years and a post-WPCP time -frame of 10-20 years. In the event that alternatives to theIp ant are decided upon, comparable time- frames are assumed to be practicable for alternative sewerage systems. In Development the pre-WPCP planning time -frame, developable land will be limited by limitations present sewer caDacity orohlems. rerTAin c>rrnr= mA" in f�rf kms_ _� a, ..0 a vew mem m mese areas ouring Ln1s tlme eriod 1s advisable. It is the intent o this analysis an up ate to ena a and owners to develop their properties and the City to grow without exacerbating the present sewer capacity problem and without further capital improvement funding for sewers beyond that provided for in the WPCP plans. Other portions of the Plan update address phases of development dependent upon capital improvements other than the provision of sewers. TABLE 1. DEVELOPABLE ACREAGE TOTALS Developable Acres Residential 723 acres 1553 acres Commercial 85 214 Industrial - 193 808 1960 Total acres w/in corporate limits Years of growth at a rowth rate of 500people/yr. at 12 people acre 17 years 37 years at 15 people/acre 22 47 *Acreages include pre- and post-WPCP periods. 2626 acres 0 131 2757 4717 710 141CRUILMED BY "-JORM MICR6LA13 CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES ! ! I 28 IV. DEVELOPMENT SEQUENCE A sequence of development has been determined for residential land uses based on an analysis of criteria which includes the overriding issue of sewer capacity, appropriate developability factors and overall urban design considerations. A land use development sequence serves as a policy guide for public decisions relating to private development. A five year capital improvements program coupled with a phased growth plan will predictably and cost-effectively allow the City to expand in an efficient manner while allowing private developers an opportunity to anticipate the community's future growth pattern. short-range development sequence for residential growth in Iowa City has been prepared (See Map C). Three phases are depicted with Phase 1 (1983-88) made up of existing development projects and areas where no capital improvements are necessary. Phase II (1988-93) extends areas available for development as major Phase III infrastructure improvements are made and Phase 111 (1993-98) encompasses definitionthose areas_ where development is dependent upon construction of the water ruiiuuon t-ontrol dant or some alternative solution to the Citv's sewer caoacitY Nruulenu. map u ouLnnes inose areas wnicn should not develop until the long range after Phases I through III are complete and for which capital improvements have not been programmed. The specific years represented each of thehp ases are tentative in that 22y delays in the provision of capital improvements will force an overall delay in the time sequence. It is possible that the actual development of the areas outlined for a particular phase may take place at a different date than that portrayed in the update; the sequence of development, however, would stand as proposed. The commercial and industrial uses indicated on the maps fall outside of the residential development sequence calculation. The timing of development for these uses will be determined to a great extent by the economic climate of a particular time. However, commercial or industrial development should be considered within the context of the specific development potential for any use in a given area. For example, industrial or commercial development proposed in those areas outlined for Phase III should consider the ramifications any development would have on the infrastructure in the area. Assumptions In analyzing the various areas within the City to determine an appropriate sequence of development, the following assumptions/conditions have been made: 1. Proximity to existing development governs the sequencing of development. 2. Areas which can accommodate the greatest population (i.e., sewer capacity available, accessible location, existing school capacity, etc.) for the least costs in capital improvements are to be considered highly developable. 3. The current availability of sewer service adds to the development potential of an area. 4. Providing enough land to support projected population increases and housing needs is a necessary criterion. h f i IIICROFILIIED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOVES i J f- MICRor ILM[D BY JORM MICROLAIS CEDAR RAPIDS •DES MOVIES I r L E-2 In east Iowa City, the major portion of undeveloped land, which lies south of Muscatine Avenue, requires the use of lift stations and force mains to obtain sewer service within the current municipal system. The land to the north of Muscatine Avenue, however, can be served through a gravity feed network. Consequently, development north of Muscatine Avenue has occurred at a different rate than the area to the south. The following discussion of development issues and the proposed sequence of future development in each of these areas is addressed with these distinctions in mind. Municipal Sewer Service ivotal issue System ullno maul �crvl�e ule owuy area enl L MLU ule KUnUBII DLreeL I runK issues and consequently contrl uta to any overload on that line. Any additional development on the East side adds to the potential for a surcharge condition. The Rundell Street conditions have been tolerated, to date, in anticipation of the construction of the proposed Water Pollution Control Plant. Assuming that the surcharge conditions continue to be tolerated in the short range, the short-range development potential of the East side can be evaluated in terms of the capacity issues particular to the north and south of Muscatine Avenue. South of Muscatine Lift stations currently in use in this area have some excess capacity. However, the Lower Muscatine Trunk, which serves those lift stations, Capacity does not have enough wet -weather capacity to handle the full development in Zof the residential area known as Village Green plus the development of the stations JIt industrial park to the south. and Lower Of the remaining 112 acres available for development south of Muscatine Muscatine Avenue, 103 acres would require the use of a lift station in order to tie into Trunk the existing municipal system. The Village Green lift station can be expanded to provide sufficient capacity to service the entire 103 acres. However, the Lower Muscatine Trunk, downstream from the lift station, is limited in the amount of additional sewage it can handle. It is in the Rundell Street Trunk/"horseshoe" system and the Lower Muscatine Trunk that severe limitations to development in the short range arise. The Lower Muscatine Trunk carries the flow from the Village Green lift station, the Heinz lift station used by Business Development Incorporated (BDI), and any gravity flows downstream from the force mains (see Figure A). In an effort to provide for development In the study area and the Industrial park to the south, agreements have been made in the past allocating certain capacities in the lift station and, thereby, in the trunk. Questions about the validity of allocating the use of a public facility have shed some doubt an whether developers have a right to rely on the future use of such allocations. Determination of the developability of certain areas rests on the ability to tie-in to the lift station and the trunk. This ability hinges on whether the City ,policy is one of allowing hook-ups on a first come, first served basis regardless of previous allocation agreements, i 1 MICROFILIIED BY 11 "JORM MICROLAB j j CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES J L E-3 or if the policy is to reserve capacity in anticipation of demand contracted for in the agreements. If previous reservations are honored, the Lower Muscatine Trunk cannot accommodate the complete development of the Village Green area due to capacity allocations for the development of the industrial park. A first come, first served policy would allow development to occur for residential uses or industrial uses, as the economy and private developers dictated. With the platting of Village Green South Part 2 and Village Green Part 10, resolution of the issue of conflicting demands on the trunk was sought through an agreement to construct a sewage detention facility which would hold the flows from Village Green for a period of time if the industrial park required full use of the trunk. The option of a detention facility allowed the residential development to proceed with the understanding that when the industrial park required capacity in the trunk, the facility would be constructed and operated. To date, the detention facility has not been constructed and the City has not felt that capacity problems have warranted requiring its provision. At the time of platting, the City Engineer advised that no more than the 130 units included in Village Green South and Village Green Part 10 be approved until the detention facility was built and tested or until a relief sewer was constructed. The current engineering policy has been to avoid the use of sewage detention facilities and lift stations due to flow equalization and maintenance problems created by such facilities. Due to these concerns about capacity allocation, the effective policy of the City has been to not encourage additional development in the area at this time. Subsequent approval of development in this area should reflect a full evaluation of the sewer problems which exist pending construction of the WPCP and the Southeast Interceptor System. With construction of the plant and interceptor, sewer capacity problems would be alleviated and the entire 112 acres plus the industrial park would be developable with City sewer service at a density equivalent to 13 people/acre. In the interim and in response to decreases in federal funding for sewage facility construction grants, a committee of concerned citizens, engineers, and policymakers has been created by the City Council to evaluate city-wide sewer capacity issues. This committee will propose interim solutions to the sewer system problems, or alternatives to construction of the plant. North of Muscatine The developable land north of Muscatine Avenue is serviced by the Southeast Trunk. There are restrictions in this trunk line which constrain the future development of the area along Scott Boulevard until a relief sewer is constructed. An agreement with a local developer to provide for the construction of a relief line has been made. With completion of the Southeast Trunk relief line, there exists enough capacity remaining to provide sewerage to all of the unplatted lands, including those within the service area boundary outside the city limits at a density of 12 people/acre. With development limited to that area within the current corporate boundaries, the development potential reaches 88 people/acre for the land lying along Scott Boulevard between Muscatine and Rochester Avenues and 34 people/acre for an area south of Rochester I I 141CROFIL14ED BY _ JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES w01,+E5 J E-6 capacities will not be an issue in the short range. However, once the East side can be fully developed and pressures are felt east of Scott Boulevard, consideration must be given to the long-range implications of residential land use and varying densities on the generation of school-age children. Parkland/Open Space Park land for the area is provided on the grounds of Southeast Junior High, Lucas and Lemme Schools, Pheasant Hill Park, Court Hill Park, and Mercer Park. A new park is currently being designed just east of Scott Boulevard and the corporate limits at the site of the Ralston Creek South Branch stormwater detention dam. An additional neighborhood park is projected for this area on the Comprehensive Plan map. The Parks and Recreation Department would like to acquire an 8-10 acre park adjacent to the Village Green stormwater management basin located in the southeast corner of the study area. As envisioned by the Parks and Recreation Department, this park would be for passive activities in contrast to the sports center function of Mercer Park. Final acquisition of this park will depend, however, on the rate at which development takes place on the remaining undeveloped land. If growth is delayed on the East side, particularly in the southern portion due to sewerage problems, this proposed park should be deleted from the short-range plan and reevaluated with completion of the long-range parkland needs study. Existing park land and the South Branch stormwater management basin should provide sufficient open space in the interim. Approval of any further development in this area should include consideration of open space between Scott Boulevard and any residential development to insure an adequate buffer between the arterial and the residential use. If Scott Boulevard is not expanded to a four -lane highway, the 100 foot right-of-way acquired for the street, with appropriate landscaping, may serve as an adequate buffer. 6. Proposed Land Use The land use map proposes only limited development be approved in the East Study area until sewer capacity problems are resolved. With resolution of this issue during Phase III, full development within the East Study area as residential use is projected. Long-range phasing of development may include residential uses along Scott Boulevard to the east. The sequence of these final development phases should be determined by the ability of certain areas to develop cohesively with neighborhoods which already exist. RECOMMENDATIONS As indicated in the sections above, the intensity and direction of development in the East Area study is dependent upon the outcome of various City policy questions. The main issues involve the provision of municipal sewer service and the completion of Scott Boulevard. The following recommendations are made to address these policy questions and to amend the Comprehensive Plan. Policy I. The City currently tolerates a wet -weather surcharge condition in the reco=endation Rundell Street Trunk in anticipation of the construction of the Water r i mmor]LMID By -JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES 9iP J E-7 consider a polic which encourages the postponement of growth in the East Area. New developments ould be directed toward those areas of the City in the southwest and the north, outside this study area, which can be serviced without increasing the potential for surcharge conditions downstream. 2. With provision of adequate municipal sewer service to this area, development should proceed with the land uses outlined in the 1978 Comprehensive Plan. 3. The sewer system north of Muscatine Avenue has the capacity to service a large area to the east of the corporate limits at a density of 12 people/acre. Since there is sufficient land within the City limits now to accommodate future growth, the City's policy of encouraging compact and contiguous growth should be retained and development within the city limits should be encouraged to occur prior to development east of the study area. 4. With the completion of in -fill development on the East side and in recognition of the inducement to development provided by Scott Boulevard and adequate sewer service, consideration should be given to the annexation of a limited amount of land along Scott Boulevard to the east. ` This action should be evaluated in the context of any policies developed by i the City -County Urban Fringe Committee since those policies may result in sufficient extraterritorial land use controls and obviate any need for annexation. S. Assuming delayed growth south of Muscatine Avenue in the short range, the proposed park site shown in this area should be eliminated. Inclusion of the park in the long range should be evaluated according to the findings of the future park land needs study. J MICROFILMED BY i -""JORM "MICR46LAB 1 CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES � I 9/, T fJ Coity of Iowa, City .MEMORANDUM odte: �t„• ;ng ?o: Captains; Sergeants; Supervisor, Anima! Control; Dispatchers and Desk Clerk From: Harvey III i11er Re: Enforcement of Noise Jrdinance - Dogs - Process $ Order A. Sec. 24.4-8 of the Noise Ordinance states: No person shall own, possess or harbor any noisy dug [bird or other animal] regardless of whether the dug [bird or other animal] is physically situated in or upon private property... However, the dog... shall not be deemed a barking dog or noisy animal if, at the j time the dog... is barking or making any other noise, a person is trespassing or threatening to trespass upon private property in or i upon which the dog.., or other animal is situated or taking any other action which would tease or provoke the dog... or other animal to bark or otherwise be noisy. Y 8. The definition of a barking dog or other animal is: { A dog or other animal that barks, bays, cries, howls, or emits any other noise continuously and/or incessantly for a period of ten (10) minutes or barks intermittently for a period of one- half ('s) hour or more and the sound is plainly audible across a residential property boundary or within a noise sensitive area. This requires the police officer, the animal control officer, or the citizen to be able to testify accordingly. C. Consequently, the following actions will be taken to enforce this section of the Ordinance. 1. Upon receipt of a noisy animal/barking dog call the person taking the call will: a. Process the request and fill out the complaint form accordingly. ! b. Dispatch a police officer; or, during those hours that the Animal Shelter is open, an Animal Control Officer, to the scene. (Advise the complainant that this will be done.) I C. The Animal Control or Police Officer will go to the 1 location where the noise or disturbance is coming from; locate the source of the noise, if possible; and after placing himself/herself a reasonable distance from the offending animal, determine that the animal is continuous or intermittent in the noise produced. Vf I, 141CRDEILMED BY 1 -JORM-MICR46LAB ..1 t CEDAR RAPIDS DES h40I S it I I d. The officer may then issue a citation to the owner of the offending animal, if the owner can be located; or, if the owner can be located and is cooperative, persuade him/her to properly control the animal in a way to stop the noise. [***Officers may issue citations for harboring a barking or noisy dog or animal; providing he/she can testify to the noise of the animal being emitted continuously or intermittently; that there was no person trespassing or attempting to trespass upon the property where the offending animal was harbored; or other factors (including the presence of the officer) did not induce the barking, baying, etc.] e. In the event that the animal caused disturbance is so temporary so as not to meet the requirements in the definition section of this order, or if the animal is quiet during the period of time the officer is in the general location of the animal; or, finally, if the owner of the offending animal cannot be located, the officer responding to the complaint will channel a copy of the complaint plus disposition to the Animal Control Division for attention and follow-up the next day. If Animal Control Officers are not available (e.g. weekends and holidays), the Sergeant of the 7-3 shift will assign all dispositions of the 11-1 shift to a day officer for follow-up, if needed. Those complaints received by the 3-11 shift will be assigned by the shift Sergeant to a member of his own shift. Follow-up will consist of: 1) A personal visit to the owner, if known, of the offending animal. 2) The issuance of a "warning" notice to the owner of the offending animal or, if the owner if the animal fails to cooperate, the issuance of a citation under Sec. 24.4-8 of the Code of Ordinances, City of Iowa City. 3) Recording 'of the time, date and nature (disposition) of the follow-up. D. Citizens filing complaints under Sec. 24.4-8 of the Code may file citations against violators of this ordinance -- and should be encouraged to do so, as needed. However, no member of this department should at any time tell them or indicate to them that they are solely responsible for filing citations. They should, however, be encouraged to become witnesses in any proceeding that might be brought against an owner of an offending animal. The impression should never be given by any member of this Department. that we are MICRDf ILMED BY 1 -"JORM MICR46LAO CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOIRES ! ' I TRW —, —� I I CITY OF IOWA CITY Officer ri1knum POLICE DEPARTMENT DATE ,19_ NAME _ i 1 TIME First Middle Last STREET ADDRESS PHONE E t� This warning has been Issued to you for a violation of the law as shown below. It has been Issued by the officer as a courtesy In lieu of a summons to court. Your future compliance with the Animal Control Ordinance is earnestly requested. NATURE OF VIOLATION Please call the Iowa City Police Department for more Information: 3563275. i 9/9 MICR......ED:SML0 "JORM--MICAB' CEDAR RA I'I DS • DIES i� May 3, 1983 Mr. Wm. Jack Sasser Manager, Airports Division Federal Aviation Administration 601 E. 12th Street Kansas City, Missouri 64106 Dear Mr. Sasser: In response to your letter of April 13, 1983, in which you state that development proposed to the north of the airport in the clear zone to runway 17 is inconsistent with the policies of your agency, the City's Airport Commission, City Council, legal staff, planning staff and joint City/County staff have initiated an intense evaluation of the problem. We feel that we have acted in good faith in attempting to comply with the assurances made in past grant agreements. The fact that the area in question is zoned commercial, and that "commercial" (not "land -consumptive commercial") as defined in our 1982 master plan and 1978 Comprehensive Plan allows apartments, is of serious concern to all agencies involved. The developer having met all legal requirements of local ordinances leaves us in a rather precarious position. Meetings have taken place between the City and the developer to try to reach a compromise, i.e. purchase of the development rights of the project to limit their development. These meetings have disclosed some additional information. It appears the developer would consider relinquishing his rights, but at a considerable cost to the City. Preliminary figures are in the $500,000-$1,000,000 price range. In light of this new information we recognize the need to examine carefully the overall picture and to analyze the benefits to be derived from the monies spent. Runway 17/35 has been the source of most of our problems. With the bowling alley and the grain elevators to the south and the U of I dormitories and the U of I Hospital and Clinics to the north, the approaches to that runway have been less than ideal for some time. The clear zone to runway 17 has had buildings, some with apartments in them, for the past 20 years. We question the logic of expending large sums of money in that clear zone. It seems to us that we could better benefit the overall community by allocating funds according to the recommendations of the master plan that has been accepted by both our agencies. We ought to de-emphasize the use of runway 17/35 by relocating the threshold of 17, thus giving us a greater margin of safety over the clear zone and proceed with the development of a preferential -noise abatement runway 6/24. 1 111CROf RMED BY 1. `JORM-MICROLAS 1 CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES we T f� J L-. T t. Mr. Wm. Jack Sasser May 3, 1983 Page 2 We have initiated steps to alleviate additional unwanted development in our clear zones. We propose to change our existing Tall Structures Overlay Zone Ordinance to prohibit all residential and high density commercial development in these areas. Since a portion of our approaches are outside the city limits we are coordinating the adoption of this ordinance with the County to Prevent any encroachment from the south. The County Supervisors and Planning staff have indicated a sincere willingness to work with us on this problem. The City Council will adopt a resolution that indicates its full support and approval of the airport and master plan and its wish to comply with all FAA regulations in the operation of our airport and to coordinate all future activities of the airport very closely with Your agency, i The City Housing Division will be revising its building permit forms to include a section that indicates that all applicable FAA regulations have been complied with (i.e. Part 77 and FAA Form 7460) to ensure that you will be aware of all future development around the Iowa City airport. The Airport Commission has already initiated its plan of action to follow the master plan by designating runway 6/24 as the preferential runway, and to facilitate that change it has expended its own funds to install an NDB approach to runway 6 and an RNAV approach to runway 24. The commission has also changed the night time lit runway from 17/35 to runway 6/24 to further emphasize the preferential status, with radio control of the other runway lights. The Airport Commission has no intention of putting the recently completed master plan on the shelf. The City will pursue a progressive program of reviewing and updating the plan as conditions warrant, with a minimum of an annual update to your agency regarding the status of the master plan. The Commission intends to abide by applicable Agency circulars with regard to aerial easement acquisition policies. We feel very badly about the situation that has developed and feel that the steps we are taking to resolve the problem and to protect the airport from all future encroachments are in the best interest of all parties involved. 1 l - • 111CRorIL14CD BY 1. -DORM i S .AB CEDAR RAPIDS -DESM01Ics 1 I Mr. Wm. Jack Sasser May 3, 1983 Page 3 City and Airport Commission representatives would like to meet with you at your earliest convenience to discuss this proposal further or answer any questions you may have. Thank you for your help with this matter. Sincerely, Mary C. Neuhauser Mayor Emmit J. George, Chairman Iowa City Airport Commission MICROFILMED BY J1 _1 -JORM"MICRdL'A B�� _--� CEDAR RAPIDS DES MOIYES i III April 29, 1983 Leisa C. Fearing 605 Manor Drive Iowa City, Iowa 52240 Re: Your Letter Dated April 14, 1983, Concerning Hawkeye's Equipment Dear Ms. Fearing: Thank you for your letter concerning your difficulties in accomplishing your goals using Hawkeye CableVision's equipment. We want to hear from anyone regarding their cable related problems, because this is one of the ways we can best keep up with such problems and best serve the public. You are correct in your understanding that Hawkeye CableVision has a franchise agreement with the City of Iowa City and that in this agreement there are certain provisions for equipment that Hawkeye is to make available for video access production purposes. The contract specifies that the equipment is to be maintained by Hawkeye without specifying such things as the time frame within which the equipment must be repaired (i.e. is one day or two weeks a reasonable amount of time to have the equipment repaired?) or when the equipment should be replaced and can no longer be adequately repaired (i.e. can the equipment first bought by Hawkeye CableVision be offered throughout the entire franchise or must new equipment be purchased at some point when the original equipment is malfunctioning regularly, etc?). As you can see, there are many questions left unanswered. The BTC has been monitoring the situation for several months and has been noting the problems that have arisen. Rather than becoming involved on a day-to-day basis with access operations and equipment problems, the role of the BTC is best fulfilled by recommending to the City Manager a policy to deal with these problems. This recommendation suggests that Hawkeye's franchise proposal offers a minimum standard of equipment to be available to all access users,and that this equipment should be available 100% of the time. The BTC further recommended the City Manager make use of his powers under Section 14-75(d)(3) of Ordinance 78-2917 to remedy any situation in which Hawkeye is not complying with this recommendation. A remedy may be made by the lease or purchase of the equipment in question or any other method deemed appropriate by the City Manager. Please find attached a copy of the BTC's recommendation on this matter. i misor ILMED DY l_ -DORM-MICROLA13 CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES I I J Leisa C. Fearing April 29, 1983 Page 2 This policy recommendation and the equipment problems it intends to resolve apply only to the equipment Hawkeye Cablevision offered in its proposal to the City. We are aware that the local Community Programming Center staff have been doing their best in trying to maintain and repair equipment and to assist community producers wherever possible when problems such as the one you decribe occur. Unfortunately such equipment problems have increased and have been complicated in the last three years by the unexpected high demand on the existing equipment, as well as by the apparent lack of an adequate equipment replacement schedule. It is intended that the BTC's policy recommendation will eliminate the equipment problems in the portable and studio video equipment area. Further, it is hoped that Hawkeye CableVision will realize the seriousness of this problem, recognize the interests and needs expressed by the high demand for community programming in Iowa City, and 1) comply with this policy and 2) replace equipment when it is worn out. In addition, it is hoped Hawkeye will expand their equipment offerings to the public (as they have in fact done to some extent) in the same spirit they have written about and spoken to regarding their support of community characteristic, to a large degree, rosm hatetHawkeyelCableVist was i]on apart from its competitor for the local franchise and one of the major reasons it was granted the franchise in Iowa City. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions or need further information. Sincerely, William Drew Shaffer Broadband Telecommunications Specialist bj/sp 9W 1 I, 1 IdICROMMED BY ; --DORM-MICRGILAB- LCEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOVIES ,J J 5 1983 605 :lancr Drive Iowa City, Iowa 72240 April 14, 1993 Mayor Lary Veuhauser Civic Center Iowa City, icwa 51240 Dear :layor Veuhauser, it is my understanding that Fart of the franchise agreement cetween the City Of ic.a City and A.I.C./ Hawkeye Cablevision is that tae latter party provide a.uipment for communtiy programming. It this is the case, then I A.T.C./Eawkeye is effectively in viclatiOn Of that contractual agreement. un April 9, IgG3 I was scheduled to moot an event I occurring Only on that day. The required equipment had been � reserved more than a month prior to that time. When I arrived at Hawkeye's facility cm the ninth, I found that the Portable video origination Mcdule, tae essential component in non -studio productions, had been sent away for repairs. Hawkeye owns only one P. V.O. M.; there was ac replacement. If this were an isolated incident - if the P.V.O..".. had broken the day before in a freak accident - I might be sympathetic. But there have teen problems with the equipment for quite awhile (the iehruary and March training vorksnops for the P.V.0.1. vete beth cancelled). A poll of other community programmers would certainly reveal similar r mICROEILMED BY --DORM - MICR6LA9" 1+ CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOI ES 9a/ J PAGE 2 atrocities. Hawkeye's programming stair has, in all rairness, tried to be accommodating. 3y shoot was salvaged by stat_ member Sandy rerzis, whose ingenious creativity and dili;ent effort over many hours provided a system rigged from a SodgeFcdge or equiFment designed for other FurFoses (including some borrowed from the public litrary) and countless adapters, connectors, and cables. The staff has also provided extra editing time, as it will take cearly three times as Long to edit tae footage. However, I was still footed tc ccmmunicdte with my camera crew using hand delivered notes and 'cda now use only direct cuts oetween cameras. It is do absurdity that this project received a ccmmuaity programming grant to "improve the quality c= production" when the absence of vital equipment makes it next to impossitle tc produce anything at all. Yours Truly, Leisa C. Fearing — cc: Mary leuhauser, Mayor, Iowa City Joan Balmer, Iowa City City Ccuncil Clemens Erdahl, Iowa City City Ccuncil Kate Dickscn, Iova City City Council Lawrence Lynch, Iowa City City Ccuncil John McDonald, Iowa City City Ccuncil David Perret, Iowa City City Council Karen Ealergis, Programming Director, Bawkeye Cablevision N 9a-1 1 i MICROFILMED BY � _JORM MICR46LA13 .� CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES ! /� I r - 1 CITY OF 1OWA CITY April 21, 1793 Chan CouItor Mayor of University Heights 1440 Grand Avenue Iowa City, Iowa 52240 Dear Mayor Coulter: &Oe4 .LAI - rhe Broadband telecommunications Commission (BTC) recently discussed the lda:•rkeye cable television system and the tremendous success the access channels, the portable video access services, and the workshops are experiencing. Ir. fact, the services offered in the form of workshops to teach citizens how to produce their own programs and the portable video equipment available to citizens so that they can actually make their own shows (both services are offered free of charge) have been so successful that we are now experiencing a shortage of equipment and staff dile to the current level of demand. As you are probably aware, the cable TV, company offers access facilities and services, now centered in the Iowa City Public Library, are available for use by all residents of Iowa City, Coralville, and University Heights. The current make up of these facilities and services are fully supported by the City of Iowa City's three percent franchise fee (received from the cable company) and Hawkeye Cablevision. All of Iowa City's three percent franchise fee is currently spent on cable and access -related regulation, administration, facilitation and promotion, equipment and workshops, which are offered to the public. Since residents of all three communities benefit from, and make use of these facilities and services, we wanted to inquire whether you and your community would be interested in assisting the support of these facilities and services through the franchise fees your community now receives from the cable company. Vie look forward to your response. Thank you for your time and consideration of this most important and public oriented endeavor. Sincerely, W. 0. 'Bill" Terry BTC Chairperson cc: Iowa City City Council BTC bj/sp L. 1 i MICROFILt4EO By I i --ORM MICR6LA13 CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES I 9 -?ai i i J recut°. IN -77 2 LEGISLATIVE �ewlttrww BULLETIN`"M"" $1N1 Suar I W an Mainn.lovu 50]16 15151 155p861 First Session, Bulletin No. 9 .April 29, 1983 MODIFIED "FAIR PLAY" BILI. PASSES SENATE Senate File 527, an Act relating to the impact of state legislative and administra. tive actions on political subdivisions, has passed the Senate on a 45-0 vote. As passed the bill represents almost two years of work by the League in pushing for legislation which will, for the first time, require by statute mandates on local government. some accountability For The bill creates a new chapter of Iowa law called the "State Mandates Act" whichwill have as its purpose to enunciate policies, criteria and procedures which govern fu- ture state -Initiated mandates on local government services, standards, employment conditions, retirement programs or agencies and entities which contract with a poli. tical subdivision to provide services. Effective January 1, 1984, whenever a bill, joint resolution or state rule is re- ce bureau quested blll, resolution or ruletwill imposea shall state`an initial mandateand if to mandato isf whether theincluded, the explanation of the bill will outline that mandate and an estimate of the amount of the costs imposed on local government. JAlthough the League supported legislation which would have prohibited the passage of legislation which imposed cost and administrative mandates, this is seen as a "good" 1 first step to future requirements. Members of the Senate should be thanked for their efforts on this bill. I FEDERAL JOBS BILL BRINGS MORE DOLLARS TO IOWA FmHA The recently -enacted emergency jobs bill appropriates additional funds to Farmers Home Administration. The funds appropriated for water and waste projects include $4SO million in loans and SI50 million in grant funds nationally. lawn will be receiving a specific appro- priation to administer to qualifying communities. The funds are available to com. munities under 10,000 population with priority to areas of 5,500 population or less. Funds will be used in accordance with current FmHA regulations for loan funding and the interest rate for the loan program will vary depending on the 1980 median family income in a community. Priority for funding will be for projects in those areas with a high level of unem. ployment, or In labor surplus areas in cities, or in pockets of poverty that are currently or should meet the criteria to be eligible under the UDAG'program. In addition to the special appropriations under the "Jobs Bill" the State has loan funds available under its regular appropriations for community facility loans. Such loans may be made to cities of 20,000 population or less. Loans may be made for such facilities as fire stations and equipment, hospitals, nursing homes, community buildings, industrial parks and other community facilities that provide essential services. Additional information on these programs can be obtained from FmHA: 873 Federal Building, 210 Walnut Street, Des Mbines, IA 50309, or call (515) 284-4152. You can also contact your district offices, BOND REGISTRATION BILL TO GOVERNOR House File 377, a bill making numerous technical changes in Iowa bond laws to comply with 1983 federal income tax amendments, has been passed by the Senate, concurred to by the House and sent to the Governor for signing. This bill will now allow bonds to be issued in Iowa after 1983 in registered form rather than in coupon form as is presently the case in most issues, (over) ;r i MICROFILMED BY I. --JORM "MICR6LAB T CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOIRES I �� _f AUM [NI STRAT IVC RIII.RS COMLMITTIiI- TO RI -I IOAR nEQ'S Rui.rs ON I'IiRMII'I'S FOIL I'DRI.IC h'A'I'IiR Hie Administrative Rules Ilevicw Committee bas agreed to schedule a re-hcoring on the rules imposed by Inwn OI:O in .lune of 1982 requiring operational permits for public water systems. The hearing will he held either ?lay 17 or Ie in Iles Moines. 'rhe specific date for discussion of this item is not known. We recommend that cities interested in this issue contact fir. .loo ]Joyce at the Statehouse for the specific time. Ile can he reached by cal'I Ing (515) 281-5184. %t this time we are nut sure what if any action the rules review committee will take. The permits and fees were due dune .ill. 198.1 and were to be effective for two years. Many cities have argued that this action was an attempt by the Iowa legislature and 1PI-Q to transfer fiscal responsibility of operating a state agency to cities with no benefits accruing to the public water systems or to the public. We would also suggest that you contact Rep. Laverne Schroeder, Chairman of the Legis- lative Rules Review Committee, and outline in the most strenuous terms your concerns about this issue. Mr. Schroeder can be contacted by calling (515) 281.1221, or write Rep. Taverne Schroeder, State Ropresentutive, Statehouse, tics Moines, Iowa SO.i19. INTERIM SUDY OF INVIiSrliSr OI' ptinLIC i:mn5 A concurrent resolution, IlCR 27, has been introduced calling for a joint Subcommittee to study legislative proposals allowing local governments the maximum flexibility for the investment of temporarily idle public funds. The resolution was sponsored by Itepls) O'Kane (p -Sioux Citvl, Chiodo (R-Pes Mbinesl and Swartz (R -Marshalltown). The resolution was prompted by increasing interest by local officials and legislators that greater flexibility of investment constitutes a significant non -tax revenue source and should therefore be investigated. The State ACIR is also investigating proposals to create a local government invest- ment pan]. TheLeague has supported such efforts in the post and has prepared draft legislation addressing this issue, along with the creation of an Investment pool for cities. City officials should contact their legislators and ask them to support the concur. rent resolution when the question Is considered by the legislative council. IIIi1.1%QIIm miapiim TAX BILL PASSES [louse Hlc 575, an Act relating to the rate of interest assessed as a penalty for delinquent property taxes, has passed the House and Is now awaiting debate In the Senate Ways and Means Committec. As passed by the Ibuse, the current penalty for later payment of the first install sent of tuxes has been Increased to one and one-half percent. WORK COMP CARR: BILL STALLS IN IIOIISG As reported in the last legislative bulletin. SF 244, a bill relating to the medical care under workers' compensation benefits, had passed the Senate on a 45-5 vote and sent to the Ilousc for action. Because the bill was received by the House after the deadline for acting on Senate. passed bilis, the bill was sent to the House Labor Committee, and a Jointly -sponsored bill by Rep(s) Aorlond and Stroller, IIF 619, was Introduced. Under normal circum- stances a Jointly -sponsored leadership bill is excluded from the debate limitations but the Icague has learned that considerable disagreement still exists over provi- sions of the Scnatc-passed version and lip hl9 vas also sent to the House Labor Com- mittee where further action is doubtful this session. As passed by the tieoite, the bill would have made major changes in the procedures for an employee selecting physicians, 9Ia 3 1 MICROFILMED BY 1 _1 -" JORM-MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOVIES I / i .3 - APPROPRIATION BILLS CLEAR COM.MITTE-e - PLACED ON SENATE DEBATE CALENDAR Three priority appropriations bills for Iowa cities have been approved by the Senate Appropriations Committee. The bills are Senate Files 529, 550 and 531. Senate File 529 appropriates $2 million for the State's share of the sewage treat- ment facilities grants. This appropriation only applies to the fiscal year begin- ning July 1, 1983 and ending .lune 30, 1984. Senate File 530 appropriates 514.65 million to the municipal assistance fund for.dis- tribution to cities. This appropriation is for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 1983 and ending June 30, 1984. Senate File 531 appropriates $1.98 million for support of public transit. This appro- _ priation is also for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 1983 and ending .lune 30, 1984. As of this bulletin, we do not anticipate any difficulty in obtaining passage of these bills with the recommended levels of appropriation. This, however, could change if the fiscal condition of the State general fund worsens. City officials are therefore urged to contact their Senators and urge them to act as quickly as possible on these bills and to maintain the levels of appropriations called for. DAVIS-BACON AMENDMENT FILED AGAIN After several efforts to amend the Davis -Bacon Act onto selected pieces of legisla- tion had been ruled non -germane, the same amendment has once again been filed to SF 380, an Act relating to projects for which industrial revenue bonds may be issued by a city or countyy. SF 380 expands thescope of Chapter 419 by adding facilities for the generation of electrical energy through the use of renewable energy sources including but not limited to hydroelectric and wind generation. I The amendment, H-3761, by Rep(s) Running (D -Cedar Rapids) and Van Camp (R -Davenport) would require that all projects authorized under Chapter 419 shall be bid at the pre- vailing wage. The League's position is that the amendment is non -germane to the bill and addition- ally is inflationary. City officials should contact their representatives and ask them to vote no on the Running/Van Camp amendment, H-3761. SF 380 has already passed the Senate and if this amendment is attached to the bill, the legislation will have to return to the Senate for consideration of that amend- ment. kORK RELIEF BILL ADVANCES House File 614, an Act to establish and fund a work relief program for unemployed Iowans during the 1983-84 fiscal year, has passed the House and been sent to the Senate for consideration. As passed by the House, $3.1 million is appropriated to the State Office for Planning and Programming to establish and fund a statewide work relief program. Funds shall be made available to any city which establishes a work relief program. Sixty percent of the state funds shall be targeted to those counties with unemploy- ment rates at least two percent above statewide rate. If a city decides to establish a program and is approved for funding, the city shall have responsibility for administering the program and shall hire and supervise indi- viduals to work on the project. The State shall provide general liability coverage for the individuals employed along with workers' compensation coverage. Individuals employed on a project would be exempt from the provisions of Chapter 97B (IPERS) and Chapter 400 (Civil Service). The city shall pay for all necessary work materials, supplies and transportation costs. (over) P-3 1 i MICROFILM BY i _. "CORM'MIC REsLAE. % CEDAR RAPIDS DES Id01NESi r I Work assignment practices shall follow an affirmative action plan based on guidelines provided by the Iowa State Civil Rights Commission. FIRE F11;17ERS PROFKITION RILL SENT TO GOVERNOR Senate File 116, a bill allowing fire fighters to remain eligible for promotion for three ,years as opposed to the current two, has been sent to the Governor for signa. ture. The League has strenously opposed this bill and similar legislation was vetoed by Governor Ray last session. If the bill becomes law, fire fighters will be receiving preferential treatment over other groups of civil service employees when it comes to promotions. Approval of this bill also means that other capable fire fighters will have to wait longer under the present system to be promoted. The League has written the Governor requesting a veto on similar grounds as the Ray veto of one year ago. City officials should contact the Governor's office to argue in the most strenuous terms that a veto is justified on this bill. QUESTIONS AND CONTROVERSY SURROUND DESIGN STANDARD BILL Senate File 370 began as a bill relating to the awards for punitive damages against officers and employees of governmental subdivisions. The bill specifically states that a governing body of a city would not be prohibited from purchasing insurance i to protect its officers and employees from punitive damages. The bill has now passed the Senate and is awaiting debate in the (louse. The delay is caused by an interest to amend the bill and expand its scope to include provi- sions which would address the Iowa Supreme Court decision of Butler v. State of Iowa which held that the State could be liable for design standards of guardrails. The proposed amendment to address this issue also deals with language which would r provide a "complete defense" for cities against suits arising out of the design and 1 maintenance of any street, road, highway, bridge culvert, overpass, road sign or drainage system that was initially constructed and subsequently reconstructed in j accordance with professionally- recognized engineering or safety standards, criteria or design theory in existence at the time of construction or reconstruction. Although the amendment, if passed, would be beneficial for cities, questions have arisen regarding the intent language to limit the legislation to only streets and roads, rather than providing that other public facilities' construction would also have similar protection from the precedent set in the Butler decision. ! Debate on the bill and the amendments) is expected yet this week. HOUSE TO BEGIN DEBATE ON UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE Debate is expected to begin this week on House File 637, a bill relating to the com- putation of employer contribution rates and employee benefits under Towa's unemploy- ment compensation law. The bill is seen as a compromise attempt to address the shortfalls in the unemploy- ment insurance trust fund. Although the bill makes numerous changes to the unemployment law the bill, as pre- sently written, does not affect the contribution rates paid to employees of political subdivisions but only applies to the contribution rates for private employers. We will keep you advised if attempts are made to expand the scope of the bill to in- volve benefit payments by cities. WEIGHT PERMITS FOR COMPACT RUBBISH TRUCKS In 1978 the League was able to secure passage of legislation which allowed for a five-year special weight permit to be issued by IDOT for compacted rubbish trucks. The special permit was only authorized through June 30, 1983 after which the weight limitations would be reduced. House File 636, a jointly -sponsored leadership bill, has been introduced and assigned to the House Transportation Committee. As a jointly -sponsored bill, it is excluded from the limitations placed on other bills introduced this late in the session. As written, the bill would extend for a period of three years from July 1, 1983 to July I, 1986 the authority for the State Department of Transportation to issue annual special permits for the operation of compacted rubbish vehicles or vehicles which trnnsport compacted rubbish which have a rear axle gross weight for two -axle ve- hicles not exceeding twenty-two thousand pounds. 0.?3 1 i MICROFILMED BY ( --JORM MICR46LAB 1 CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES r� .J ��cut v t LEGISLATIVE 9�o�M BULLETIN . an Mmnn.Ww9316 15151 x659981 First Session, Bulletin No. 10 May J, 1983 SPECIAL ALERT - IMMEDIATE ACTION REQUESTED The General assembly is in its closing days and several issues which have a di. rect bearing on cities are being consolidated and amended into other bills. These amendments could be debated at any time and ]IMMEDIATE ACTION is necessary. The following is an analysis of Senate File 531, a transportation appropriations committee bill which has already passed the Senate and is awaiting debate in the House. This bill contains amendments which the League opposes and supports and will also be the focus of amendments filed in the House which the League opposes and sup- ports. Please note that following the analysis of the controversial sections of this bill, the League indicates either support or opposition to those sections. This po. sition should be transmitted to your legislator DDIEDIATELY. SENATE FILE 531 1. Section 16 of the Senate -passed bill continues the 5500,000 appropriation (off the top) of the state road use tax fund to pay to the Iowa Conservation Commis- sion for wind erosion control barriers. This diversion from the BUT fund costs cities approximately $90,000 per year 0135 of $500,000). Attempts to shift this program to IDOT failed. An amendment has been filed by Reps. Weldon (R -Iowa Falls) and Jochum (D -Dubuque) which would stop the diversion of this money to the Iowa Commerce Commission and instead put the responsibility with IDOT and lower the amount to $100,000. The League supports the Welden/Jochum amendment H-3995 to Senate File 531. Ask your representatives to support the amendment. 2. In Bulletin No. 9 we advised of attempts to address the problems in design stan- dards for streets, roads, and guardrails which were raised by a recent Supreme Court decision, Butler v. State of Iowa. We outlined our concerns that the intent language was not broad enough to take into account public improvements other than streets, roads and bridges. A new amendment has now been drafted which addresses the League's concerns and is part of the House appropriationb committee amendment filed to Senate File 531. This amendment, H-3996, provides cities with a "complete defense" for suits aris. Ing out of the design and maintenance of any street, road, highway, bridge, cul. vert, overpass, road signs, drainage systems, public improvements and public fa. cilities that were initially constructed and subsequently reconstructed in accor- dance with professionally -recognized engineering and safety standards, criteria or design theory in existence at the time of the construction or reconstruction. This portion of amendment H-3996 is supported by the League. Ask your represen. tative to support those sections of H-3996 wTiich address the design standards issue. Clarify that you are only supporting those sections of the amendmentdeal- ing with this issue. 3. Also incorporated into the same amendment, H-3996, is a section which would at- tempt to divert sales and use tax revenue which would have otherwise gone to the Road Use Tax fund as pan of the It increase in sales tax to the state general fund. The amendment states in part that if state revenue estimates are reduced from the April 1983 projections, the difference between the April estimates and the succeeding estimates will be made up from an amount transferred out of state road use tax fund to the general fund but the amount transferred shall not exceed S20 million for the year beginning July 1, 1983 and ending June 30, 1984. This was the same approach which was proposed when the bond proposal for highway building was debated. proponents argued that since the cities never had the re- venue, it was not as if it was being taken away. Therefore, it should be used for another purpose, in that case, first lien against bonding for primary high- way improvement, in this case against a possible deficit financial position in i MICROFILMED BY 1. -JORM MICROLA13 CEDAR RAPIDS • DES HOMES 9-? the state general fund. The League opposes that portion of H-3996 which would transfer this revenue. The Legislative Fiscal Bureau estimates that the cities' portion of this revenue would amount to approximately 51.92 per capita or close to S4 million. Contact your representatives and urge them to vote against that portion of H-3996 which would transfer revenue from road use tax fund to state general fund. J. Section 20 of the Senate -passed 531 already contains provisions for "advancing" 51,000,000 from the road use tax fund to support public transit. This money will be advanced beginning July 1, 1983 through June 30, 1985 and is in addition to the state appropriation of $1.9 million already approved by the Senate. The League suppo ^s the advancing of this transit assistance revenue. Contact your representative and tell them not to change this portion of the Senate -passed bill. CALL TODAY ON THIS BILL. REPRESENTATIVES GW BE CONTACTED BY CALLING: (51S) 281-3221 I I N 1 v M!C?DEILMED BY —JORM MICR6L6 CEDAR RAPIDS DESdDN I 9a3 0 Ji • LEGAL SERVICES CORPORATION OF IOWA IOWA CITY REGIONAL OFFICE 401 South Gilbert Street(aanamrofCourtend Gllben St..) -I... City. low. 62240 Serving = 12101961-0670 Cedar. De. Main... Henry. Johnson. Lee. L.W.a. Mastodon .ad Washington Counties May 9, 1983 MAY 91983 Mary C. Neuhauser, Mayor Civic Center MARIAN K. KARR 410 E. Washington CITY CLERK (3) Iowa City, Iowa 52240 3:iss!H•/70 RE: Robert A. Rath - Taxicab Driving Permit Revocation Hearing Set for 7:30 p.m., May 10, 1983 Dear Mayor Neuhauser and City Council Members: Mr. Rath has asked me to contact you to request that the hearing concerning the revocation of his taxicab driving per- mit, set for 7:30 p.m. on Tuesday, May 10th, take place in a closed session pursuant to §28A.5(1), 1983 Code of Iowa. That section provides that, upon a two-thirds vote or a vote of all members present at the meeting, a governmental body may hold a closed session to the extent necessary for any of the reasons set forth at §28A.5(1)(a-j). I believe that at least two of those subsections would permit closure in these circumstances. Specifically, I would direct your attention to subsection (d) which permits closure to discuss licensing examinations or licensee disciplinary proceedings, and to subsection (i) which permits closure to evaluate professional competency. With regard to subsection (i), it is important to note that that sec- tion is not limited in its scope to employees of a governmen- tal body conducting the hearing. It is especially important to Mr. Rath to have this hearing closed because of the very public nature of his job. If he is successful at the hearing in persuading the council to reinstate his permit, it is essential to his continued abi- lity to earn a living that the charges that have been made against him not be aired to the public on cable television or discussed in detailed before numerous observors. An open hearing might well cause Mr. Rath the very sort of "needless and irreparable injury to [his] reputation" contemplated in §28A.5(1)(i). In addition, Mr. Rath will experience dif- ficulty in persuading witnesses, including his present and former employers, to appear and discuss their hiring and firing practices at such a public forum. In short, a closed LSCI BRANCH OFFICES Cedar 11itud.. Cn..eil 111W.. Davenport. De -M -1-e- - Duh -au-. lawn City Mason City .Ottumwa. Sinus City. Waterloo MICROFILMED BY JORM-MICROL"AB' ] CEDAR RAPIDS • DES I401NES .7,W J City of Iowa Cif. MEMORANDUM Date: May 6, 1983 To: City Council From: Robert Jansen, City Attorney �K Re: Rath Hearing Robert Rath has appealed the notice of revocation of his taxicab driving permit, and pursuant to 535-35 of the City Code this matter is set for public hearing before you on May 10, 1983, at 7:30 p.m. Attached are copies of the revocation notice and Mr. Rath's appeal. The hearing shall be conducted in accordance with the procedures outlined in the Iowa City Administrative Code, specifically 52-186. Below is 535- 35(f) which sets out the parameters for your decision in this matter: bj5/8 535-35(f). The City Council shall render its opinion within thirty (30) days of the close of the hearing. The decision of the City Council shall be a final determination and the appellant may seek relief therefrom in the district court of Iowa as provided by the laws of this State. Such decision may consist of: (1) Reaffirmation of the original decision to revoke, suspend or deny renewal of the license or permit, or (2) Deletion or alteration of any part of the original decision, or (3) Reversal of the original decision by reinstating or ordering the renewal or issuance of the license or permit. 7 i MICROEILIdED BY I. --JORM "MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS DES MOINES Vas J CITY OF IOWA CITY CHIC CENTER TIC) F. WAS ING;0N Sr IOWA C11Y ;li: (314; h,1­5a March 22, 1983 Mr. Robert A. Rath Box 38, R.R. 1 Solon, Iowa 52333 Re: Notice of Driving Permit Revocation Dear Mr. Rath: You are hereby notified that your taxicab driving permit is revoked effective seven (7) days after service or mailing of this notice. This action is taken by authority of 535-35(a)(2) of the City Code, and is based on the fact that you have been involved in several alcohol-related incidents in the past two months. Specifically, on February 7, 1983, you were arrested in front of K -Mart for public intoxication by Iowa City police; on March 8, 1983, Iowa City police found you intoxicated in your car behind the Gilbert Street Tap; and on March 9, 1983, you were again found in your car and transported by Iowa City police to Mercy Hospital in Cedar Rapids for treatment in their detoxification program. It is my determination that it would be detrimental to the safety, health, and welfare of the residents of Iowa City for you to continue to hold a driving permit. You have a right to a hearing before the City Council and, if requested, such a hearing shall be granted. However, failure to request a hearing by filing a written appeal with the City Clerk within seven (7) days of service or mailing of this notice and order shall constitute a waiver of the right to a hearing and such notice shall become a final determination and order. Sincerely rs, P Neal G. Berlin City Manager cc: City Clerk bj5/4 Certified No. 4248495 MICROFILMED BY --JORM"MICRCICA13 T L% CEDAR RAPIDS • DCC iuu tS � I .J L 9�S /rv1cQ..�i�t.i April 11, 1983 City Clerk Civic Center 410 E. Washington Iowa City, Iowa 52240 Res Petition of Appeal Dear Clerk: Please consider this letter to be my written Petition of appeal from your notice revoking my taxi cab drivin I believe this appeal to be timely,9 permit. service of that notice was made omynemployerfonhMonday,that April 4, 1983. Also on that date, I received actual notice i of the revocation from the Cityi Clerk's office. Please set this matter down for hearing before the City Council at your earliest co convenience. I am that any facts sexistt•whichhis awouldbhavesbeenda groundlfore refusal to issue Iowa City Code(my) permit" as required by 535-35(a)(2), . Nor do I believe that it would be detrimen- tal to the safety, health, and welfare of Iowa City residents for me to continue to hold a driving permit. Thank you for Your attention to this matter. Sincerely, Robert A. Rath 925 Kirkwood Avenue APR1119E3 V Iowa City, Iowa 52240 (319) 338-9113 �TY CLIf V '4'4;.r i MICROFILMED BY - JORM MICR6LA13 1 CEDAR RAPIDS DES MOINES I i Re�eIVeo APR I ;) 1983 l£CAC DePARrMENTi 907.0; J City of Iowa City MEMORANDUM DATE: April 28, 1983 TO: City Council and City i4anager FROM: Frank Farmer, City Engineer Lw . RE: Cost Estimates for Various Projects as proposed Melorse Court $6,000.00 in house S 80,000.00 $ 86,000.00 Attached is the memo to Council from Dan Holderness, Civil Engineer, dated April 21, 1985, listing options for St. Anne Drive and Tanglewood/ Ventura. 1 MICROFILMED BY 11. _`DORM "MICR46L"AB- � CEDAR RAPIDS DCS MOINES I I � y4s� �l Construction Eng. Default Fund Total Costs Const. Financing Cost St. Anne Drive $77,987.80(assessed) $22,377.44(assessed) $103,802.74 3,437.50(not to be assessed -City to fund intersection removal & replacement Kimball Road $10,414.80(assessed) $ 2,187.11 5 27,492.91 $14,891.00(not to be assessed -City to fund Curb installation) Tanglewood -Ventura $109,903.00(assessed) $30,079.00 $139,982.00 Engineering Construction Total Costs Rundell/Dearborn/ $8,000.00 consultant $230,000.00 5246,500.00 Center Storm Sewer $8,500.00 in house Melorse Court $6,000.00 in house S 80,000.00 $ 86,000.00 Attached is the memo to Council from Dan Holderness, Civil Engineer, dated April 21, 1985, listing options for St. Anne Drive and Tanglewood/ Ventura. 1 MICROFILMED BY 11. _`DORM "MICR46L"AB- � CEDAR RAPIDS DCS MOINES I I � y4s� �l City of Iowa Citi MEMORANDUM Date: April 21, 1983 To: City Council and Neal Berlin From: Dan Holderness, Civil EngineerY'� F, Re: St. Anne's Drive and Tanglewood/Ventura Paving Assessment Programs Attached to this memo are three different charts detailing the following information: Chart 1: `Four options with varying percentage splits and the property owner's and City's corresponding.total construction cost for each option for St. Ann's Drive as originally proposed. Chart 2: Four options with varying percentage splits of the construction costs and the property owner's and City's corresponding total costs for each option for St. Ann's Drive based on assessment to properties with direct access only. Chart 3: Four options with varying percentage splits and the property owner's and City's corresponding total construction costs for each option for the Tanglewood/Ventura paving program in 1984. Also included are the assessments as proposed in 1979. Ken Haynie, the City's legal counsel for assessment proceedings, has advised the staff that the basic assumption of assessments is to equally assess properties with equal benefit from the project if the properties meet the necessary criteria. However, this assumption can be circumvented if the parties subject to a higher assessment or percentage of the total assessment waive their right to equality by agreement. Mr. Haynie has advised the staff the assessment boundaries may be changed between the preliminary and final stages of the assessment procedure without starting the process over. However, the property owners cannot be assessed more than their preliminary assessment. This implies if the City decides to assess only the properties with direct access to St. Anne's Drive, the City would have to pick up approximately 815,650 in costs if the project is 100% assessed. If the bids came in lower, however, the City could cut down the amount it would have to pay before the property owner's assessments would be lowered from the preliminary figures. If the City would want to change the assessment boundaries in a way that would raise some assessments above the preliminary figure and did not want to risk having to pay any difference, the assessment procedure would have to be restarted from the beginning. be/sp 141CROEILI-IED BY 11. "-JORM MIC R(yLAB A 1 CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES CHART I l i MICROFILMED BY I I" --- JORM--MICR6 CAB 1 CEDAR RAPIDS • DGS MOINES I J ST. ANNE'S DRIVE SPECIAL ASSESSMENT PROJECT AS PROPOSED IME OF PROPERTY OWNER ASSESSMENT AS PROPOSED (100%) ASSESSMENT IF CITY ASSESSMENT AT ASSESSMENT AT PAYS 25% (Same as if CITY -50% OWNER -50% CITY 75% OWNER 25% Assess construction onl Dean, Cont to PH Grantham 4,746.57f 3,559.93 i Dean, cont to G14 Grantham 2,373.29 1,186.65 3,857.77i 2,893.33 1,928.89 964.45 Estate Frank P. Gahan J Campbell 1,597.01 1,197.76 798.51 399.25 j 422.65 316.99 211.33 105.66 Glasgow 42,244.42 34,683.32 23,122.21 Guyer & Merideth 11,561.11 i 119.45 69.59 59.732 9.87 Whetstone 6,653.40 4,990.05 3,326.70 1,663.35 I B. 13,117.69 9,838.27 6,558.85 3,279.42 Nelssonon 4,449.99 3,337.49 2,225.00 1,112.50 W Ye 99Y 1,178.76 884.07 589.38 294.69 �. Bross 6,621.90 4,966.43 3,310.95 1,655.48 �) Barnes 495.77 371.83 247.89 123.94 � Sales 752.14 564.11 376.07 138.04 Conway, Inc. 3,678.12 2,758.59 1,839.06 919.53 Valanis 6,429.62 4,822.22 3,214.81 1,607.41 TOTAL TO BE ASSESSED 100,365.26 75,273.98 50,182.67 25,091.35 TOTAL TO BE PAID BY CITY 3,437,48 28,528.76 53,620.07 78,711.31 TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST $103,802.74 CHART I l i MICROFILMED BY I I" --- JORM--MICR6 CAB 1 CEDAR RAPIDS • DGS MOINES I J ST. ANNE'S DRIVE SPECIAL ASSESSMENT PROJECT BASED ON DIRECT ACCESS NAME OF PROPERTY OWNER ASSESSMENT AS PROPOSED (100%) ASSESSMENT IF CITY PAYS 25% ASSESSMENT IF CITY PAYS 50% ASSESSMENT IF CITY PAYS 75% 1. P. Grantham 6,644.69 4,983.52 3,322.35. 1,661.17 2. G. Grantham 5,400.46 4,050.35 2,700.23 1,350.12 3. C Whetstone 7,602.12 5,701.59 3,801.06 1,900.53 J 4. B Glasgow (7 lots) 44,772.23 33,579.17 22,386.12 11,193.06 5. B YeggY (3 lots) 18,363.34 13,772.51 9,181.67 4,590.84 6. Bross 8,581.62 6,436.22 4,290.81 2,145.41 7. Valanis 9,000.77 6,750.58 4,500.39 2,250.19 TOTAL TO BE ASSESSED 100,365.24 75,273.95 50,182.62 25,091.31 TOTAL TO BE PAID BY CITY 3,437.50 28,528.79 53,620.12 78,711.43 TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST 103,802.74 CHART 2 � J i .. i MICROFILMED BY 1 II. -JORM--MICR#LAB- CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES 9,?sa-- JI U CHART 3 ' 1 i wusonuaro BY l I_ JORM-"MICR6LAB CEDAR RAPIDS DES MOINES I JI TANGLEWOOD-VENTURA SPECIAL ASSESSMENT PROJECT Q� NAME OF PROPERTY OWNER ASSESSMENT 100% ASSESSMENT 100% ASSESSMENT IF ASSESSMENT IF ASSESSMENT _ AS PROPOSED 1979 AS PROPOSED 1984 CITY PAYS 25% CITY PAYS 50% CITY PAYS 75 1. Jensen 9,049.62 14,939.46 11,204.52 7,469.68 3,734.84 ti 2. Carlson 9,049.62 14,939.36 11;204.52 7,469.68 3,734 84 3. McCoy 3,861.17 6,374.13 4,780.60 3,187.07 1,593.53 4. Jesus Christ Church 4,524.81 7,469.68 5,602.26 3,734.84 1,867.42 5. Berg 14,781.04 24,400.94 18,300.71 12,200.48 6,100.23 J 6. Pieper 19,728.17 32,567.81 24,425.86 16,283.91 8,141.95 7. Casey 6,636.38 10,955.52 8,216.64 5,477.76 2,738.88 8. Pitzen 7,058.70 11,652.70 8,739.54 5,826.35 2,913.18 i 9. Shepherd 6,787.35 11,204.74 8,403.55 5,602.38 2,801.19 10. Kleinhesselink 3,318.19 5,477.76 4,108.32 2,738.88 1,369.44 TOTAL TO BE ASSESSED 84,795.05 139,982.00 104,986.50 69,991.00 34,995.50 TOTAL TO BE PAID BY CITY --- --- 34,995.50 69,991.00 104,986.50 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT $139,982.00 CHART 3 ' 1 i wusonuaro BY l I_ JORM-"MICR6LAB CEDAR RAPIDS DES MOINES I JI