HomeMy WebLinkAbout1983-10-17 Public hearingE
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER
THE PROPOSED VACATION AND DISPOSITION OF A
PORTION OF THE DUBUQUE STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY
LOCATED BETWEEN THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE
OF COLLEGE STREET AND THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF-
WAY LINE OF THE ALLEY BETWEEN DUBUQUE AND
CLINTON STREETS.
Notice is hereby given that a public
hearing will be held by the City Council of
Iowa City, Iowa at 7:30 P.M. on the 17th
day of October, 1983, in the Council
Chambers in the Civic Center, Iowa City,
Iowa; at which hearing the Council will
consider the vacation and disposition of
that portion of the Dubuque Street
right-of-way located between the south i
right-of-way line of College Street and
approximately the south right-of-way line
of the alley between Dubuque and Clinton
Streets. (A legal description of the
right-of-way to be vacated and disposed of
is on file in the Office of the City
Clerk.) This notice is given pursuant to
Section 362.3 of the Code of Iowa, 1983.
MARIAN KARR, ITY CLERK
0008
C7
0
STATEMENT OF RICHARD F. HANSEN IN OPPOSITION TO THE VACATION AND -CLOSURE
OF THE PEDESTRIAN MALL (DUBUQUE STREET -COLLEGE TO BURLINGTON) - 10/17/83
Madam Mayor and Members of the Council:
Mr. Hansen was going to deliver this statement, but since he is in Fort
Worth, TX on business, I am going to read this statement, and I quote:
"I expected to be here on this occasion to support the resolution which
would provide for air rights over the pedestrian mall configured on
Dubuque Street, but unfortunately we are here to discuss the closing of
Dubuque Street pedestrian mall from -College to Burlington.
First, I would like to see submitted to Plaza Centre One a statement
indicating how fire trucks will access the east side of Plaza Centre i
One. On the occasions that fire trucks have come to this location, (not
I
because of Plaza Centre One, but for other reasons), they have come from
the south. I"believe the fire trucks would not be able to access the
Dubuque mall from either the east or the west because turns at Lucas
Square would not be possible by the trucks nor would it be possible
from the alleys. if they were to come from the north, permanent vehicular
obstacles would have to be removed for accessibility by such trucks.
The Council may be aware, as I am sure Mr. Berlin is aware, that the
Dubuque Street pedestrian right-of-way was paved as a street with bricks
being laid on top of the paving in that right-of-way for such purpose
as fire trucks, and also for the purpose that Dubuque Street could be
reconfigured as a vehicular street if the pedoctrian m,ll .",fl -4 nnt" (and
1
f
-2-
I put in quotes) work out. I would like a plan of access by the fire
department to Plaza Centre One so that it may be submitted to our insurance
company for review.
After learning of the potential configuration of the new hotel construction, l�
on the afternoon of October 7, 1983, Mr. Lind and I reviewed the plans
of the hotel project dated September 9, 1983 on file at the Building
Inspector's office at the Civic Center. We assumed the plans were
preliminary because all the aspects necessary for a building permit were
f
not there. The plans did not contain the name of a registered architct
in the State of Iowa. A configuration in which a 10' corridor adjacent
to the College Block Building which is covered by the hotel building and
was also interrupted by pilasters of the College Block Building is the 1I
l
only access to Plaza Centre One from the south. The remainder of the
Dubuque Street area and property was filled in with the building. There
was a hotel lobby space with glass in it as well as a pedestrian dropoff
for the hotel which meant that people accessing Plaza Centre One would
apparently go through or look through the hotel lobby. There had been
a previous plan dated August 12, 1983 that showed a double lobby in the
hotel, presumably for public circulation through the hotel, but that has
been eliminated. This configuration does not conform to the bid documents
issued by the City and prepared by Mr. Zucchelli which required and
showed an open air pedestrian way through the building on the approximate
center of the Dubuque Street right-of-way. I suppose that the hotel
people have said that the lobby would remain open to pedestrian traffic
at all times. That we would find very difficult to believe as being
arceptable for security of the hotel and, after a ca!^lc months of
-3 -
usage, we would expect that access to be denied because of the uncertainty
of usage.
Let me take some of your time to discuss a little history. The owners
of Plaza Centre One individually and collectively through Hansen Lind
Meyer have supported urban renewal from the beginning. While Hansen
Lind Meyer has at times had differences of opinion with the City, in the
final analysis we have alwbys supported the final direction that the
City has taken. Hansen Lind Meyer has proposed designs on almost every
urban renewal project and, although not successful on all of them, have
been in support of them and are in support of the hotel project. But I
must indicate as a property owner that we cannot support the present
configuration.
Plaza Centre One was the first building to be built as part of the urban
renewal project and that was not without a great deal of problems. We
received no grants, property tax abatement or other financing assistance
from the City. The project was delayed for construction because we
could not receive a building permit until all aspects of the project
were approved by the Design Review Committee and by the building officials
from Kansas City. In fact, we were denied the opportunity to start our
foundations until such an approval was given. We felt that that delay
cost us as much as $80,000 in construction time, delays, and inflation
at that time, but we did not pursue any kind of litigation at that time.
Further, the mall construction was delayed and completed much later than
originally projected. That delay provided for a poor access to our
o�f70 0
c
Li
-4-
building for an extended period. Third, the parking ramp at Burlington
and Dubuque Street was built at a later time than was expected. More
recently, concerns about additional parking and a vehicular dropoff to
the mall area have been urged by myself and such requests have gone
unheeded. We understand that concessions for all the parking required
by the hotel will be made available in the ramp. We cannot understand
why such concessions are made for the hotel and no consideration is
being given to Plaza Centre One for their needs. I feel that all of
these have impacted the viability of Plaza Centre One and these reasons
have been a primary cause of the slow occupancy of this building. It
has been only in the last four months that we have gone over 80 percent
occupancy of our -building. That is a long time in coming.
Initially, as partial owners of Plaza Centre One, we supported the
pedestrian mall concept and, while this denied us a direct vehicular
access to our building, we felt that the humane aspects of a pedestrian
mall overcame.,this liability. Vehicular access and lack of immediate
parking are liabilities. We have been turned down by prospective tenants
because we have been unable to "guarantee" parking for a portion of the
people who would work in such an office space. Just this past year the
Chamber attempted to locate a new employer in Iowa City. Plaza Centre
One was the preferred location but no parking could be guaranteed and
was finally rejected. It is an uphill battle to be located on a mall
without direct vehicular access.
1
F
-5-
Plaza Centre One was developed in concert with a particular mall design
and access to parking. Direct pedestrian access and visual access
along that pedestrian mall is now being destroyed. Within the past year
and one-half, Mr. Lind and myself acquired the remaining portion of
Plaza Centre One. At this point in time the pedestrian malls were
complete except in the area of the Public Library. We relied on the
location and configuration of these malls and Lucas Square in determining
to make a further substantial investment in downtown Iowa City. We
believe that we will be damaged by the present plans of eliminating the
i direct pedestrian functional as well as visual access of Plaza Centre
One from parking and from vehicular dropoff. We believe that the tenants
in our building will be similarly affected and know personally that
Hansen Lind Meyer has close to 200 visits a day. All of these visits
I
are coming from people such as salesmen, contractors, and clients who do
not walk to our office from other parts of the downtown area but park
j
itheir cars and come to Plaza Centre One. I am sure like numbers can be
experienced by other tenants in our office space, particularly by those
commercial elements located on the lower two floors of Plaza Centre One. -
There is a large count of people who come to this building directly from
the parking ramp to utilize the downtown area in their trips to our
building.
Tonight I am afraid that I must stand here and formally object to the
vacation of the pedestrian mall along the Dubuque Street right-of-way as
presently planned. I object to it:
0 88
.1
Gi
511
J
(1) For the concern of the accessibility of fire department and
emergency vehicles.
(2) Because it denies a direct functional access to Plaza Centre One
which was assured as part of the urban renewal project. It
has been functioning as such for the past several years. A
10' corridor which will appear much as an alleyway and I am
sure will also be a security problem is not an appropriate
direct access to -our building or to Lucas Square.
(3) Visual access through a lobby which is over 60' in depth and
which will have furniture and people in it is not an appropriate
visual.access from the parking or for any kind of dropoff to
our building.
(4) Viability of Lucas Square will be greatly diminished by the
present configuration of the hotel building.
The exciting part of being on a pedestrian mall is that during the day
from 11:00 to 3:00 to experience the utilization of that mall by many
people. The mall and its design and configuration has been extremely
successful and Lucas Square is one of the better people spaces that I
have had an opportunity to experience. But with the present layout and
configuration of the hotel, it will be greatly diminished because at the
time of the day that I just discussed, the sun will not shine on a
portion of Lucas Square and the effectiveness will easily be cut in
half.
aoCO
,J
J
,J
-7-
Mr. William H. Whyte, a nationally renowned student of public spaces,
has demonstrated that public spaces are not utilized unless there is
sunlight. Lucas Square and its basic environment was part of the urban
renewal plan, and one of the reasons that Plaza Centre One accepted its
position without vehicular access. The viability of that square was
also one of the reasons that Mr. Lind and I acquired the remaining
portion in Plaza Centre One.
I don't believe that a building can be done without appropriately developing
an environmental impact statement on an existing public space such as
Lucas Square and I know of no such environmental impact statement made.
I think Mr. Berlin and others on this Council are aware that numerous
environmental impact studies were made when the mall was -built.
i I urge you as a Council to take immediate steps to not vacate the pedestrian
mall, to see that the building is properly reconfigured to allow for an
appropriate direct and visual access to parking and vehicular access
from the south to Lucas Square, Plaza Centre One, and the businesses
already on the mall, to provide appropriate and safe access by emergency
and fire vehicles, and to assure a proper configuration to allow for the
continued use of Lucas Square as it enjoyed prior to the hotel project.
It is my feeling that as an owner of Plaza Centre One, I have been
damaged from a functional standpoint and that Plaza Centre One has been
significantly reduced in value.
10
I as an architect would also like to raise another concern. The most
recent plans that were on file as of October 7 indicated the exterior
material was stucco. It is my understanding that final approval of
exterior material has not been given by the Design Review Committee, but
the foundation plan done by an engineer registered in the State of Iowa
appears to be final. This plan confirms the configuration problems that
I have expressed as does the activity on the site. These plans also
confirm a lightweight material on the exterior of the building. If the
material were to be heavier weight material such as concrete or brick, I
would assume that the foundations would need to be stronger.
While there are many different architectural expressions within the
Lucas Square area and in fact in most of the remaining portion of downtown,
there has been a unifying element of material. It is very difficult to
make a building which must be built on a modest budget an architectural
gem. Consequently, the buildings must take a background statement and
support the activity of the ground level. This is true with Plaza
Centre One as it was designed and configured to support Lucas Square.
The materials were to be a.quiet demonstration and simple so it could
blend in with the surrounding buildings and the landscape.
Although this is an aesthetic issue, I do raise a concern as an occupant
i
on the Lucas Square area about the use of stucco as an appropriate
material. Stucco is not known for its longevity or its extended overall
maintenance in this climate. It would appear that since the foundations
are going in, that decision is being matte without approval.
ao��
I/
-9-
We urge the Council to promptly review this matter and to review designs
that are compatible with other structures that are part of the Urban
Renewal Project.
Very truly yours,
Richard F. Hansen
RFH:ji
J
rr_
5
0
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER
THE PROPOSED 1983 ZONING ORDINANCE AND MAP.
Notice is hereby given that a public
hearing will be held by the City Council of
Iowa City, Iowa, at 7:30 p.m. on the 17th
and the 25th days of October, 1983, in the
Council Chambers in the Civic Center, Iowa
City, Iowa; at which hearing the Council
will consider the proposed 1983 Zoning
Ordinance and Map. This notice is given
pursuant to Chapter 414.4 of the Code of
Iowa, 1983. '/ t
/�T2tG2x� 7S. 7�a.+�i
MARIAN K. KARR, CITY CLERK
v?o9/
3
WILLIAM L.MEARDON
WILLIAM F. SUEPPEL
ROBERT N. DOWNER
JAMES P. HAYES
JAMES D. MCCARRAGHER
THOMAS J. CILEK
i MARK T. HAMER
THOMAS D. HOBART
MARGARET T. LAINSON
ANGELA M. RYAN
DOUGLAS D. RUPPERT
1
MEARDON, SUEPPEL, DOWNER & HAYES
LAWYERS
122 SOUTH LINN STREET
TELEPHONE
IOWA CITY, IOWA 52240
338-9222
AREA CODE 019
The Honorable Mayor and Manbers of
the City Council
City of Iowa City
Civic Center
410 East Washington Street
Iowa City, Iowa 52240
Re: Christian Retirement Services, Inc.
October 13, 1983
OCT 17 1983
CIN CLERK
Dear Mayor Neuhauser, Ms. Dickson and Gentlemen:
our office represents Christian Retirement Services, Inc. of Iowa
City, the non-profit corporation which owns and operates the Oaknoll
Retirement Residence at the address locally known as 701 Oaknoll Drive in
Iowa City. The total property owned by Christian Retirement Services, Inc.
at that address is outlined in red on the enclosed zoning map. At various
times since 1966 there have been constructed on this property a total of
more than 130 apartment units and a 48 bed licensed health care facility.
In this complex, facing George Street, are two duplexes located on Lots
1 and 2, Grandview Manor, Second Addition.
As with the City of Iava City, Oaknoll has had its own camrehensive
expansion plan which has been developed over the last several years. The
first phase of the plan was recently completed and involved the construction of
an additional 28 apartment units at a cost , for land and structure, of in
excess of three million dollars. The next phase of this plan involves the
expansion of the licensed health care facility, located in the northwest
corner of the complex and imediately east of the two duplexes. Due to an
expansion of the health care facility which occurred approximately ten years
ago, a portion of the driveways and parking area serving that portion of the
complex actually cover a portion of Lots 1 and 2. It is the plan, when the
health care center expansion occurs, to move the two duplexes and expand the
health center to the west onto Lots 1 and 2, Grandview Manor, Second Addition.
As you may be aware, when Oaknoll executes contracts with its
residents, it agrees to provide then with all health care services which the
resident may reasonably require except for care which may require hospitalization.
Mayor and City Council
City of Iowa City
October 13, 1983
page 2
Because of the recent expansion of the apartment residence area of Oaknoll,
it is anticipated that, based upon past experience, this addition to the
health care center will be necessary to fulfill the commitments made to
those residents. Because of the general "Younger" age of the residents of
the new addition, Oaknoll's experience has been that such residents do not
generally require nursing care for srnetime after admission. This is the
reason why the expansion of the health center did not occur at the same time
ex the construction been of leted all additional
illresidences.
locatted in one building
expansion has been comp
and will be part of one overall facility.
For the above and foregoing reasons, it is respectfully requested
that Lots 1 and 2, Grandview Manor Second Addition be reclassified to the
FM -44 zoning classification from the RS 8 zoning classification so that the
entire contiguous Oaknoll canplex might have the same zoning classification
and the requested expansion might be possible. i
Construction having an inflation-adjusted cost of well in excess
of ten million dollars has occurredon
this site
whwithin the
ve servedseventtee
years, brought about by tea group qualityretirement facilities to Iowa
without -
city on
no in an attempt to bring hopeful
City on a non-profit basis. we are hopeful that this relatively minor i
modification in the zoning classification of a small portion of this property
can occur so as to enable this corporation to further serve its present
at large.
and future residents as well as the cortmwaity
y Yo
Enc.
cc: Mrs. Felicia Hope
Mr. M.D. Hartwig
Mr. John D. Benz
ao9�
C7
h
October 13, 1983
City Council
Civic Center
Iowa City, Iowa 52240
RE: Proposed Zoning Ordinance
Councilors:
July of this year I purchased a home located at 928 Davenport St - a location
currently zoned as Two Family. One of the reasons I purchased this home is
because of its basement, which with some modifications, could be made
into an apartment - hence income could be derived from this property which
i
increases the value of the home.
The proposed zoning ordinance places my home just two blocks north and 23t,
blocks west of a RM -12, low density multi -family rating. Unfortunately, the
proposed ordinance rezones my home to a RS -8, medium density single family
rating.
Because the value of ray home is affected by this change, I ask that you
consider zoning my neighborhood R11-12.
I Th yo .
P yllis A. Williams
OC"f 13 19B3
MARIAN K. KARR
CITY CLERK (3)
0
-1