The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1983-10-25 CorrespondenceSUMMARY OF RECEIPTS SEPTEMBER, 1983 TAXES i LICENSES 8 PERMITS 18,248.27 FINES 8 FORFEITURES 33,023.82 CHARGES FOR SERVICES i 1 i i f SUMMARY OF RECEIPTS SEPTEMBER, 1983 TAXES $ 197,706.87 LICENSES 8 PERMITS 18,248.27 FINES 8 FORFEITURES 33,023.82 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 474,777.97 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 800,293.22 USE OF MONEY 8 PROPERTY 187,057.95 MISCELLANEOUS 157,948.77 TOTAL GENERAL 1,869,056.87 LEASED HOUSING 165,709.67 OTHER HOUSING 22.305.55 TOTAL SPECIAL 188,015.22 GRAND TOTAL 2,057,072.09 m 1 CITY OF IOWA CITY FINANCIAL SUMMARY 30 -SEP -83 HEMMING ADJUSTMENTS EHOINO FIIIJIi 111VESTMEIJT BALANCE CIIEL'P II6J A1C OAI ANCE+ FUND/ACCPUNT FUND BALANCE RECEIPTS DISBURSEMENTS TO BALA14CE BALANCE 35, 000.00 421, 908.66 1,083, 090. 67 661, 102.01 35. OGO 00 417.507. 41 -3U2. 007. 41 GENERAL 615.675.80 40, 625.47 .00 . GO 664,301 -'/ 500. 914. 97 75..IU6. 30 DEBT SERVICE CAPITAL PROJECTS 2,430.006.85 530, 921.53 634, 239.40 13, 901 5'.! 2. 340. 594 5U 2.340. 594 Sri 211.5:18 OO 58 ENTERPRISE 4.161,974.17 716,316.75 025.532.04 -312,015.70 4. 040, 74J IU .1. UU9. 204.60 TRUST 4 AGENCV 7.001.729.62 82, 711.13 '67. 323.32 .00 &.997.117 43 6.996. 994 65 122 78 INTRAOOV. BERVICR 540,370.30 1.208,699.21 11351.612.32 -153,827. 01 243, 63U IU 243.630 IU 00 SPECIAL ASSESSIEIR 67,765.90 1.306.02 .00Oi, 69.071 4d 69.071.92 00 SPECIAL REVENUE 358,064.01 358.700.83 173,465.34 -209,164.8:! 934.234 6U 334.234 ttl __..__.___-.______ 00 SUBTOTAL ____________________________________________________..__.._.._____.._. 15.21;.606.67 3,369.349.60 3r B�Sr 263. 09 .UO H_732. 643-10.14. 000_l52 9I ___75.459-75_ PAYROLL 16, 350. 29 1. 153.970. 10 ;,07H,2111.34 . OL 92,0313 OL 00 92.030 85 LEASED HOUSING 159.552.52 165.709.67 111,348.90 .UO 213.913 :r .0U 21 J. 413. 29 IC HOUSING AUTW0911TV .00 .00 .00 .OU OU 00 .00 PUBLIC MOUSING 105,069.92 4,756.51 33.218.65 .00 76.607. '7U 7.145.50 69.462.22 MOD REHAB 7.85 .02 7.87 .UO OU .00 00 HOUSING 22004 23.486.50 17.549.02 16.466.21 .Gi. 24.569 .II 14.237.92 10.331.34 SUBTOTAL 304,467.08 1,741.985.32 1.239.323.17 ___-_--_ 00------ 407.129 23 21.383 40 305.745 75 BRAND TOTAL 3 4.71.334. .26. P,_15..... 022-74-Ii_UL:9, 596 7Y L31 U. 2U b. 00 JJ .....................................................5.. • CHECKING ACCOUNT SALANCEB ARE INTEREBTBEARING ACCOUNTS WITH THE EXCEPTION OV PAYROLL. m 1 COUNCIL LISTING SEPTEMBER 30, 1963 VENDOR NAME PRODUCT DECRIPTION AMOUNT FUND: GENERAL FUND 3M L882668 BOOK PROCESSING ACADEMY OF NATURAL SCIENCES BOOKS (CAT./CIR.) SUP 2,113. ACTION SEPTIC TANK SERVICE PRIOR YEAR ENCUMB. 5. 630.E ADNIL ENTERPRISES ANIMAL SUPP. 20•. ADVANCED DRAINAGE SYSTEMS, INC BLDG. & CONST. SUPP. 321.1 ADVOCATOR WELFARE ANSWERING PRINT/REFERENCE AERO RENTAL TOOLS & EQUIP. AIR COOLED ENGINE SERVICES MINOR RENT. 132.1 EQUIP REP. ALA CASSETTES MAT 162.1 ALLIANCE AGAINST SEXUAL ALTHOFF. GRACE ALVA MUSEUM REPLICAS, INC. AMAC'ERICAN BINDERY .-iERICAN INST. OF CERTIFIED INC. IONS CORP. B VACUUM SALES & SERV. INC. ALLEENE DAVID OF NATIONAL AFFAIRS PAAPER E BOOKELIBRARY 1 1 310 7 2,1 2, 1 COUNCIL LISTING SEPTEMBER 30, 1903 PRODUCT DECRIPTION ANOU14T CLASSIFIED AU 42. DISC. (CAT./CIR.) i54. SUBSCRIPTION 15. TRAVEL 161.' ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 618. BOOKS (CAT./CIR.) B. BOOKS (CAT./CIR.) 18. COMM. EQUIP. REP. 857.'. DATA PROCESSING SUPP 93.' BOOKS (CAT. /CIR. ) 10. REC. CLASSES/LESSONS 6.1 REP. & MAIN. TO BLDG 2,314.1 ni na 2. rnmQT anon opo 1, 1 1 4, E 1 1 1 i COUNCIL LISTING SEPTEMBER 30, 1983 NAME PRODUCT DECRIPTION 'IC CONTROLS. INC. ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES AMOUNT '.IC, INC. REP. OF 28.80 STRUCTURE E6GLINC. TOOLS & SUPPLIES 1, 460.00 219.95 CO.ASS, 20.00 MISC. REFUNDS PEDIC SUPPLY MINOR EGUIP. REPAIRS 116.00 BOOKS (CAT. /CIR. CO., INC. SANITATION SUPP. ) 20.85 400.20 EERINO CO., INC. PROFESSIONAL LSERVICES 104.00 AL SUPPLY, INC. RECREATIONAL EGUIP. 195.00 ORMSANOOUTIDEYRITIG CO. SPNN 356.20F TRAVEL INC. FILM 636.16 PROCESSING LTD. ATTORNEY 10.57 SERVICE N & SUPPER CLUB MEALS 190.00 30.00 INC. GRAPHIC SUPPLIES (CAT./CIR.) 31.53 ERSABOOKS SERVICE, INC. JUDGEMENT & DAMAGES 18.95 37.00 ASSOC. DUES & MEMBERSHIPS _ARCH, INC. BOOK(S) 155.00 9 nn IC INC. 06 9, 434 5 B5 276 1, 655 380 16 -125 63 17,985 224 759 9,453 20 7,357 178 30 76 105 27,056 15. 14,436. 21, 567. 33. 31, 5. 67. 11. 13. 173, 189. 1 B. .,r I VENDOR NAME KELSO, NILA KEOKUK ENERGY_SYSTEMS CO. COUNCIL LISTING SEPTEMBER 30, 1983 PRODUCT DECRIPTION AMOUNT 40. MISC. REFUNDS 5' FIRST AID SUPP. 3• BLDG. & CONST. SUPP. 135. CERTIFICATIONS 33. FOOD ALLOWANCE REPORTER 159. SHORTHAND uei r 13,684. N ONAL INSTITUTE PLUMBING SUPP. PRESCRIPTIONS, DRUGS ' 168.75 66.70 NATIONAL NATIONAL LIGHTING BUREAU MUSEUM OF ART YEAR ENCUMB. 17. 315.04 95 IONS PRIOR VIDEO RECORDINGS 519.88 158.48 12 69 nATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL MINOR EGUIP. REPAIRS REFERENCE MATREIAL 133.00 NATURAL SURFACES & CO.. INC. SERVICE, INC. AIR FARE CLASSIFIED AU 433.00 20.00 DISC. BOOKS (CAT./CIR.) IINQ CO. REFERENCE MATREIAL PROCESSING 12.00 11.42 6,870.00 ABS, INC. FILM BOOKS (CAT. /REF. I 12.00 199.80 NORTHWESTERN DELL 6SHINOTON , "Y Co., INC. BOOK BINDING PURCHASE FOR RESALE 17. 75. 50 00 IATOR CO. FORME, INC. REP. & MAIN. TO BLDG DATA PROCESSING SUPP 175. 10,500.00 57 1ENT, INC. i OR DARLENE VEHICULAR EQUIP. MISC. REFUNDS 3.00 95.00 PITNEY BOWE8 SUPPLY ORCHARDS AG. CHEMICAL6 MISCELLANEOUS SUPP. REGISTRATION 25.00 CORP. SUBSCRIPTION OUTSIDE PRINTING 672. 2,793.00 p9 LIFE INSURANCE DISnVoLiueanuARF SUPP 567.19 NATIONAL ARCHIVES TRU531 runu GEOGRAPHIC SOCIETY p`pOKS (CAT. /C IR. ) DO a. r„ 5.00 NATIONAL NATIONAL LIGHTING BUREAU CLASSIFIED AU 10.00 29.95 NATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO PLAN PRINT/REFERENCE 9.70 4TTONAL RECORD 4TIONAL RECORDING CO. CLASSIFIED AU FILM 12 69 nATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL PRIOR YEAR ENCUMB. 125. 49 300.00 NATURAL SURFACES BUILDING IMPROVEMENT 25.30 NEUMANN MONSON NEW WORLD RECORDS DISC. BOOKS (CAT./CIR.) 3.00 78.00CLASSIFIED NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE NIGHTINGALE-CONANT CORP. AU PRIOR YEAR ENCUMB. 6,870.00 NOEL'S TREE SERVICE TELEPHONE EQUIP. FEE 7,309.51 42,06 NORTHWESTERN DELL OFFICE SUPPLIES 11.46 PAUL'S PEOPLE LOVERS BOOKS (CAT./CIR.) FILM 14.76 PEOPLE'S DRUG STORES, INC. OFFICE FURN./EQUIP. 139.50 104.25 PIONEER, INC. OFFICE EQUIP. REPAIR 7 49 PITNEY BOWE8 SUPPLY ORCHARDS AG. CHEMICAL6 MISCELLANEOUS SUPP. 18.96 PLUMBERS i I I VENDOR POPULAR SCIEt PORTABLE COMF PRAIRIE.LIGH1 COUNCIL LISTING SEPTEMBER 30, 1903 OOK CLUB OK& VIDEO ETTE CENTER , INC. INC. INC. INC. 3NS, INC. INC. C0. 9. INC. 9 INTL. Q & GRADING 3LISHING IEDER CO. TIONS. INC. 'DIC CLINIC AVEL CO., INC SUPPLY CO. IONS, INC. NC. , LTD. CO.. INC. ACCOUNT 5, 3, 1 3, 1 1 5 1 2 2 GIS COUNCIL LISTING SEPTEMBER 30, 1903 PRODUCT DECRIPTION AMOUNT BULK MAILING 6,750.00 UNIFORM CLOTHING ONTROL, INC REP. OF STRUCTURE 4,683.35 1,000.00 REES PRESS BOOKS (CAT. /CIR. D CLASSIFIED ) 10.95 AU 29.95 BOOKS (CAT. /CIR. ) 11.00 SUBSCRIPTION 94.00 PRIOR YEAR ENCUMB. C. BUILDING RENTAL 25.50 q 4880C., IN REFERENCE MATREIAL 1, 00.00 07.75 CLASSIFIED AU 2 24.00 RECREATIONAL EGUIP. 24.00 MINOR EGUIP. REPAIRS 837.05 FOOD ALLOWANCE 7.50 PRINT/REFERENCE 33.33 C 00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICE 19,257.40 MICROFISCHE 123.75 FUND TOTAL 253, 633.35 J I I, VENDOR NAME FUND: CAPITAL PROJECTS AAA IOWA WORLD TRAVEL CORP COUNCIL LISTING. SEPTEMBER 30, 1983 PRODUCT DECRIPTION AMOU14T AIR FARE 198.00 APPRAISAL SERVICES 1,740.00 OPERATING EQUIP. 2,870.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES 32.00 EASEMENT PURCHASE 75.00 FILM PROCESSING 7.18 LEGAL PUBLICATIONS 37.08 FICAS 620.08 CONTRACTED IMPRV. 2,394.00 CONTRACTED IMPRV. 10,521.25 CONTRACTED IMPRV. 318,155.00 OUTSIDE PRINTING 491.61 ENGINEERING SERVICES 868.50 LONG DISTANCE CALLS 11 37 IATES ENGINEERING SERVICES 15,139.58 CONTRACTED IMPRV. 104,640.86 RING SERV ENGINEERING SERVICES 3,050.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES 27,521.90 QQ FUND TOTAL 488,853.30 - I I j i VENDOR NAME FUND: ENTERPRISE FUNDS A. Y. MCDONALD MFG. CO. AERO RENTAL ALBERHASKY, CHARLES MRS. CO. .Y L, INC. COUNCIL LISTING SEPTEMBER 30, 1983 PRODUCT DECRIPTION AMOUNT , INC. VICE, INC. EERING CO. BUPP Y CO. PPLY CO. PEDRO ONST. CO. INC. SIGNAL CORP. PURCHASE FOR RESALE 5,212. EGUIPMENT RENTAL 688. MISC. REFUNDS 4. MISC. REFUNDS 43• MINOR EGUIP REP. MAT 247. REGISTRATION 75. SANITATION SUPP. 42. DUES 1, MEMBERSHIPS 76. PRIOR YEAR ENCUMB. 43. FREIGHT PRIOR YEAR ENCUMB. 332. PAGING 60. COMM. EQUIP. REP. 1,302. MISC_ REFUNDS a. I, 25, 1, 2, 1, J I r� VENDOR NAME FUND: ENTERPRISE FUNDS A. Y. MCDONALD MFG. CO. AERO RENTAL ALBERHASKY, CHARLES MRS. CO. .Y L, INC. COUNCIL LISTING SEPTEMBER 30, 1983 PRODUCT DECRIPTION AMOUNT , INC. VICE, INC. EERING CO. BUPP Y CO. PPLY CO. PEDRO ONST. CO. INC. SIGNAL CORP. PURCHASE FOR RESALE 5,212. EGUIPMENT RENTAL 688. MISC. REFUNDS 4. MISC. REFUNDS 43• MINOR EGUIP REP. MAT 247. REGISTRATION 75. SANITATION SUPP. 42. DUES 1, MEMBERSHIPS 76. PRIOR YEAR ENCUMB. 43. FREIGHT PRIOR YEAR ENCUMB. 332. PAGING 60. COMM. EQUIP. REP. 1,302. MISC_ REFUNDS a. I, 25, 1, 2, 1, COUNCIL LISTING SEPTE11DER 30, 1983 "InAruurl AMOUNT MISCELLANEOUS SUPP. 25.50 EQUIPMENT SERVICE 8,966.44 OFFICE SUPPLIES 26.03 MISC. REFUNDS 19.58 SAFETY SHOES 35.00 MISC. REFUNDS 16.34 MISC. REFUNDS 50.00 MISC. REFUNDS 57.19 SANITATION EQUIP. 20.00 OA f\IT q 6 25, 9, 12, 1, q ALTIES, INC. INC. SERVICES I CO. - INSURANCE I CO. IN CENTER 'CCE• INC. TS CO. INC. T. CO. SCHOOL OF COS N JO WMENT Co., INC. ID iK ERIC SUPPLY CO. COUNCIL LISTING SEPTEMBER 30, 1983 2 3. 1 1 1, 1, 1 1 COUNCIL LISTING SEPTEMBER 30, 1903 VENDOR NAME SWEETING. BYRON PRODUCT DECRIPTION MISC. REFUNDS AMOU14T SWENKA LAND IMPROVEMENT SWENKA, NORMAN CONTRACTED IMPRV. 35.42 4,984.00 TAKES, KATHY CONTRACTED IMPRV. MISC. REFUNDS 176.00 17.17 TANG, KAO-YEONG MISC. REFUNDS 4.44 TECHNICAL SPECIALTY SYSTEMS NON -CONTRACTED IMPRV 1,675.00 TERRACON CONSULTANTS, INC. ENGINEERING SERVICES 468.75 THOMPSON-HAYWARD CHEMICAL CO. CHEMICALS - 150.00 THOR' S HAMMER, LTD. TOM ALBERHASKY CONST., INC. MISC. REFUNDS REPAIR & MAINT. 10.39 TRAILRIDGE CONDOMINIUMS MISC. REFUNDS 3,457.62 19.05 TROTT, GRETCHEN MISC. REFUNDS 11.03 U 12F IA. BASIC TRAINING COURSE REGISTRATION • 120.00 U OF IA. CENTER FOR CONF. AND REGISTRATION 85.00 U OF IA. HYGIENIC LABORATORY TECHNICAL SERVICE 139.00 4LER. SOB ILITY EQUIPMENT CO. MISC. REFUNDS IMPROVEMENT MATERIAL 15.66 1,341.71 �- GNER, BARBARA WALLACE & TIERNAN MISC. REFUNDS COMM. EQUIP. REP. 34.26 298.00 WALSH, BRAIN WANDLING & ASSOCIATES MISC. REFUNDS MISC. REFUNDS 14.23 WARING, RUTH L. WATSON, DOUGLAS MISC. REFUNDS MISC. REFUNDS 93.71 50.00 WEINGEIST, THOMAS WILLIAMS, ROBERT MISC. REFUNDS MISC. REFUNDS 2.34 22.47 WRIGHT, PRISCILLA TECHNICAL SERVICE 23.04 31.25 XIAOYUAN, LIU YOUNG, LISA MISC. REFUNDS MISC. REFUNDS 37.28 ZAMAN, MIR ZEHR, FRED MISC. REFUNDS 34.48 9.48 ZELL, JEFF MISC. REFUNDS 52.53 12.43 FUND TOTAL 212, 735. 00 i VENDOR NAME FUND: TRUST AND AGENCY A. M. BEST CO. AIRCRAFT OWNERS & PILOTS ALFRED PUBLISHING CO.. INC. ARENBCDAORFHOEDITAL ASSOC. BAKER & TAYLOR CO. BAKER 6 TAYLOR COMPANY FOAB CO. ARCHIVES INSURANCE AST CENTRAL INC. INSTITUTE, INC FUND TOTAL COUNCIL LISTING SEPTEMBER 30, 1983 PRODUCT DECRIPTION AMOUNT PRINT/RFFFRFNCE 30.00 32, 3, 3. 31.09 91.76 216.52 156,40 6.66 169.00 3.00 80.00 8.50 23.93 330.00 176.00 16. 95 43, 639. 57 VENDOR NAME FUND: TRUST AND AGENCY COUNCIL LISTING SEPTEIIDER 30, 1903 PRODUCT DECRIPTION AMOUNT 4, 32,1 5 1, 1 CO. INC. 8 & PARTS CO. ION TRUCKS NK MS CO. ING CORP. WASH SUPPLY CO. 6 ELECTRIC NCE CO. it ELECTRIC S. AUTOMOTIVE EK SUPPLY, INC. , INC. TRICK COUNCIL LISTING SEPTEMBER 30, 1983 PRODUCT DECRIPTION AMOUN MISCELLANEOUS 589 I111SES 6,116 2 1 1, 1 1 2,0 2.8 1 m CO. , E SYSTEM T CO. ENT C AND TRECTI NC. DDY UIPMEI RES, INC. L&V: INC. TRUCE IN SUP J COUNCIL LISTING SEPTEMBER 30, 1903 V NAME N THY CO. S, INC. DALE CD. , INC. RIE I6 ON, INC. VII COUNCIL LISTING SEPTEMBER 30, 1983 FUND TOTAL 4,595.93 12.00 1, 296,64t.29 J I VENDOR NAME FUND: SPECIAL REVENUE FUND BLUE CROSS & BLUE SHIELD CREDIT BUREAU OF IOWA CITY ELDERLY SERVICES AGENCY F STOP HANLON, PHYLLIS AND MCDANIE HDC BUSINESS FORMS CO. uimmm. MRS. CARL ANDCL R. ABSTRACT HISTORIC COUNCIL LISTING SEPTEMBER 30, 1983 PRODUCT DECRIPTION AMOUNT HEALTH INSURANCE 34.OB 10.00 DUES & MEMBERSHIPS AID TO AGENCIES 11000.00 FILM BUILDING IMPROVEMENT 34.30 3,360.00 OUTSIDE PRINTING BUILDING IMPROVEMENT 42.15 6,368.39 BUILDING IMPROVEMENT 855.00 WORKMEN'S COMP PREM. 34.27 PETTY CASH LEGAL PUBLICATIONS 39.60 PERS 499.86 623.70 FICA F ABSTRACTS 55.0025.00 REGISTRATION 6.46 PAINT & SUPPLIER BUILDING IMPROVEMENT 6,175.69 BUILDING IMPROVEMENT 336.91 63.00 DISABILITY INSURANCE 10.00 BOOKS, HAG., NEWSPAP DUES & MEMBERSHIPS 50.00 LONG DISTANCE CALLS ENGINEERING SERVICES 132.62 3,450.45 BUILDING IMPROVEMENT 3'606.50 _ BOOKS, MAG., NEWSPAP FUND TOTAL 26,840.31 VENDOR NAME ASSISTED HOUSING VARIOUS LANDLORDS CITY OF IOWA CITY MERRILL 8 FLORINE SMALLEY AUR APARTMENT AGENCY AUR APARTMENT AGENCY I AUR APARTMENT AGENCY, AUR APARTMENT AGENCY j ROBERT FOX "QBERT FOX ;BERT FOX MIKE HODGE DELBERT MILLER PLUM -GROVE ACRES, INC. SEVILLE APARTMENTS SEVILLE APARTMENTS TOWN 6 CAMPUS APARTMENTS WAYNE AVENUE APARTMENTS MARGUERITE E. WELTER HANNAH WESTON/CHARLES NADLER CITY OF IOWA CITY COUNCIL LISTING SEPTEMBER 30, 1963 PRODUCT DECRIPTION AMOU14T RENT 65,897.50 JULY EXPENSES 10,030.39 RENT 498.00 RENT 191.00 RENT 176.00 RENT P4.00 RENT 93.00 RENT 171.00 RENT 250.00 RENT 222.00 RENT 70.00 RENT 206.00 RENT 66.00 RENT 224.00 RENT 62.00 RENT 187.00 RENT 213.00 RENT 302.00 RENT 160.00 AUGUST EXPENSES 13,457.11 TOTAL ASSISTED HOUSING 92,500.00 GRAND TOTAL E 2,414,842.62 3 La CITY CSF CIVIC CENTER 410 E. WASHINGTON ST, s 0 W/A' C 171 Y IOWA CIN, IOWA 52240 (319) 356-5000 ENGINEER'S REPORT October 18, 1983 Honorable Mayor and City Council Iowa City Iowa Dear Honorable Mayor and Councilpersons: I hereby certify that the construction of the improvements listed below have been completed in substantial accordance with the plans and specifications of the Engineering Division of the City of Iowa City. The required maintenance bond is on file in the City Clerk's office. Sanitary Sewer for Kennedy's Waterfront Addition, Part One to Iowa City as constructed by Knowling Brothers Contracting Company of Iowa City. I hereby recommend that the above mentioned improvements be accepted by the City of Iowa City. ae�y� a Frank K. Farmer City Engineer bdw2/2O Lj 3p�� 915 F,. Fairchild, Iowa Oity, Iowa 52240 Octob::r 15, 1903 City Council, Civic Center - Iowa City, Iowa 52240 Gentlepersons: i This is a small note of appreciation for the work that all of you have done for all of us during the past few years. One wishes that it weren't necessary to have a fruit basket upset, we would have liked to have had all of you stay on, but we know that isn't possible. Even though we were disappoiinted that David Perret did not run again, we know too that all j of you have served at great personal sacrifice to ,yourselves and we understand that. To see Iowa City now, and think of what it was just a few short yoars ago, one wonders how such a transformation could take place. Thanks to all of you. Sincerely, Herbert and Maria,= Michael OCT i 3 1983 CITY CI FPI( ,30/� I 1 October 27, 1983 Mr. and Mrs. Herbert Michael 915 East Fairchild Iowa City, Iowa 52240 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Michael: Your letter addressed to the City Council was received and placed on file at the October 25 meeting of the Council. Your very kind comments are certainly appreciated. It is indeed satisfying to see the changes that have taken place in Iowa City in recent years. I am sure that all of the Council members view this as sufficient reward for the effort and hours expended. Again, thank you for taking the time to write. Sincerely yours, David Perret Mayor Pro Tem is cc: City Clerk ,30/9 J e TERRY E. BRANSTAD OOVCRNOR RECEIVED 0.7 1 0 1983 OFFICE OF TII1; GON ER\OR STATE CAPITOL DES MOINES, IOWA 50319 515 281-5211 October 5, 1983 The Honorable Mary Neuhauser Mayor of Iowa City City Hall Iowa City, Iowa 52240 Dear Mayor Neuhauser: I want to thank you, the City Council, and the City Staff for providing me with the interesting and informative tour of city facilities during Local Government Week 1983. Iowa City citizens have much to be proud of. I hope that your community's participation in Local Government Week will bring about a greater under- standin affairsgofatheecityion, and participation in the Very truly yours, Terry E. Branstad Governor TEB/jrh 7 October 1983 Mary Neuhauser, Mayor Civic Center 410 B. Washington Iowa City, Iowa 52240 Dear Mayor Neuhauser, The quality of the air in Iowa City is already com- promised by the high concentration of motor vehicles here. Do we really need to encourage further deterioration by permitting several weeks of lawn refuse burning just because some people are nostalgic for the smell of burning leaves? In addition, that picturesque smoke hanging in the trees is a real problem for people with less than perfect respiratory systems. I respectfully suggest reconsideration of this issue. Sincerely, i� KJo Nellie Kremenak 815 N. Linn Iowa City, Iowa 52240 cc: Neal Berlin November 1, 1983 Ms. Nellie Kremenak 815 North Linn Iowa City, Iowa 52240 Dear Ms. Kremenak: At its regular meeting of October 25, 1983, the City Council received and placed on file your letter regarding the burning of lawn refuse which is allowed during the period of October 8 through November 12 this year. The City Council has chosen not to change the policy this year. You may wish to circulate a petition to obtain as many signatures as possible to support your request and submit it to the Council: next year in time to allow consideration of this issue again before the autumn season. If you have any questions concerning this matter or other City services, please give me a call. Sincerely yours, Neal G. Berlin City Manager Is cc: City Clerk 30.21 1 uibef(ty COMMURication EASTDALE VILLAGE MALL 1700 FIRST AVE. IOWA CITY, IOWA 52240 October 12, 1983 City Council and Iowa City Broadband Telecommunications Commission Civic Center Iowa City, Iowa 52240 Dear Commission and Council Members: s (310) 331.5827 The owners of the Iowa -Illinois Manor apartments are breaking federal laws, and are reducing revenues to the City of Iowa City. I'm referring to the illegal satellite dish providing cable TV service to residents of the new 54 -unit apartment complex at 505 East Burlington Street. This dish is located at the apartment site and provides 5 channels of satellite -derived programs (including pay movies) to apartment residents, allegedly at 'no cost.' The satellite channels now provided are HBO, Cinemax, WGN, WTBS, and ESPN. Local channels 2, 7, and 9 are also provided. Several motels in the area are doing the same thing (usually offering one 'free' movie channel). The Federal Communications Act of 1934 (as amended) requires an agreement between cable operator and program originator before distributing satellite -derived signals. This involves paying a monthly fee for each customer connected to that system. These payments are very significant to the movie and entertainment industry, in fact, are the sole source of revenue for programmers like HBO and Cinemax, who derive no revenues from advertising. Iowa City's legitimate cable TV company, Hawkeye Cablevision, forwards approximately 1/2 of every dollar collected for HBO and Cinemax back to these programmers. Most of the money is used to purchase movie rights or produce new movies and specials. HBO spends about 400 million dollars each year in this manner, all of it coming from legitimate operators like Hawkeye Cablevision and our company. The Copyright Act of 1976 also requires payments when rebroadcasting local or distant signals from commercial TV stations. Hawkeye does this, but the illegal system which I cite is not paying to rebroadcast Channels 2, 7, 9, or WGN or WTBS. Hawkeye also pays 3'%, of its gross revenue (Including revenue from HBO and Cinemax, to the City of Iowa City to support local programming efforts and the operation of the Broadband Telecommunications Commission. So the owners of the illegal apartment system not only are Ignoring federal regulations, but are not contributing to the City like Hawkeye is. 30A.7— Gi These apartment owners and motel owners (and the vendors who install equipment for these applications) usually used a'private property' smokescreen when selling or installing an illegal system. Of course the city is somewhat limited in its possible actions because the public streets and alleys are not used. A legitimate cable operator, through his franchise, is granted the right to use the streets and alleys, an absolute necessity to reach all areas in the city. The legitimate operator also meets all of the many requirements in the cable TV ordinance which in Iowa City includes providing a 35 -channel system, providing public access channels, complying with FCC regulations, making payments to the city, etc. The owners of the illegitimate apartment system are avoiding all of this. Furthermore the apartment system is extremely cost effective because of the high density in the complex (resulting in low installation cost), the fact that the owners are not paying the required fees including the 3% fee to the city, and the fact that .they can ' probably charge $25 to $30 more for rents because of 'free cable.' The contention that 'since we charge nothing for the service, we cannot be forced to pay the normal charges and fees' is not valid -- payments of the programming and copyright fees is required irregardless, and the service is not 'free, anymore than the water, sewer, or garbage pickup services included in the rent structure are 'free.' I realize that the city is in no position to enforce federal regulations, and the fact that the system is entirely on private property complicates ordinance enforcement, but there are other ways to combat unlawful pirating and evasion of payments. I hope that the city will take immediate action to eliminate this pirating, and will support the efforts of Hawkeye Cablevision and other legitimate operators like ourselves when we take action against such pirating. Sincerely, 'moi I Pete Peterson, Partner 3 oaa Ci "�°tilyl IOWA CITY/ CORALVILLE NVENTION BUREAU October 19, 1983 Mayor & City Council City of Iowa City Civic Center Iowa City, IA 52240 Dear Madame Mayor and City Council: OCT 20 1983 CITY CLERIC In early April the Iowa City City Council agreed to advance the Convention & Visitors Bureau $6,000, to be repaid from our first motel tax allocation. At that time, the city staff and I were assuming the first quarter revenue would be processed through the state by late August and the second quarter revenue would be processed through the state by late November. Unfortunately, the money was delayed at the state level and was not returned until October. This means the second quarter revenue may not be processed until January. By late November the bureau will run into cash flow problems. We are requesting that you consider allocating the bureau its first quarter revenue, $6265.75 and let us repay our original advance from the second quarter allocation. This money will be used to run our normal skeleton operation and wiil not be used to hire additional staff. I have enclosed a budget for your information. Thank you for your consideration. Yours truly, JE Renee Jedlicka Director Convention & Visitors Bureau Enclosure P.O. BOX 2558 IOWA CITY IOWA 52244(319)337-9637 3oa3 Assets Chec Savi Tota Liabilit Sala Bene Oper Trav Tota. I I i October 26, 1983 Ms. Renee Jedlicka, Director Convention & Visitors Bureau P. 0. Box 2358 Iowa City, Iowa 52244 Dear Renee: At its regular meeting of October 25, 1983, the City Council received to pay snfile herexpees frthe rnsoen advan funds alariesand otBureau. The Council agreed to comply with your request, and a check in the amount of $6,000 will be released on November 1, 1983. Sincerely yours, Dale E. Helling Acting City Manager Is cc: Finance Director City Clerk 3 November 2, 1983 Ms. Renee Jedlicka Convention Bureau P. 0. Box 2358 Iowa City, Iowa 52240 Dear Renee: A check in the amount of $6,000, which you requested in your letter to the City Council dated October 19, 1983, is enclosed with this letter. It is may understanding that you wish to repay the original advance of $6,000 from the second quarter motel tax allocation. Sincerely yours, Dale E. Helling Assistant City Manager Is i cc: City ClerkV" Enclosure 303 =I Neil Berlin City Council Civic Center Iowa City, Iowa 52240 Dear Mr. Berlin and Members of the Iowa City Council: I am enclosing the preprinted letter which was circulated on many of us who do have parking ramp permits in the Linn Street Ramp by Tom Summy. In addition to this let me indicate that I have been parking in the Linn Street ramp since the day that monthly permits were first offered a couple of years ago. On only one occasion have I ever seen cars parked on the roof area and I have very seldom seen over 20 cars on floor E. I do not understand the concern about shortage of space as there is absolutely no shortage of space nor has there ever been in this ramp. Both myself and several others from our office do use floor E and none of us have ever experienced difficulty. The problem lies solely in the amount of ingoing and out- going traffic through singular actions or exits, but this is certainly nothing that the parking permit holders add to. I am sure that most of us, if required to move to the other ramp, will drop our parking permit and simply go on a pay as you go basis which means most of us, who arrive prior to 8:00 A. M., will be using first floor parking space. It is hoped that you will give this matter further consideration. WMT&S _ Enclosure very truly yours, ,�. M. &�r cc o William M. Tucker I�Err-- _p OnT 4. V1 1983 PHELAN, TUCKER, BOYLE & MULLEN ATTORNEYS AT LAW L.=. SNNLMAN (.00B-0963) BREMER BWLOING TuvI.ONE WILLIAM V PHCLAN WILLIAM M.TUCKCR P. G. BO% 2150 IOWA CITY, IOWA 52244 (019) L 35A-0104 DANIEL W. BOYLE F D CHARLES A. MOLLEN October 17, 1983 STEPHEN F. BRIGHT 1983 BRucc L. WALKER OCT 13 RICHARD M.TVCHER THOMAO H.GCLMAN CITY CLERK Neil Berlin City Council Civic Center Iowa City, Iowa 52240 Dear Mr. Berlin and Members of the Iowa City Council: I am enclosing the preprinted letter which was circulated on many of us who do have parking ramp permits in the Linn Street Ramp by Tom Summy. In addition to this let me indicate that I have been parking in the Linn Street ramp since the day that monthly permits were first offered a couple of years ago. On only one occasion have I ever seen cars parked on the roof area and I have very seldom seen over 20 cars on floor E. I do not understand the concern about shortage of space as there is absolutely no shortage of space nor has there ever been in this ramp. Both myself and several others from our office do use floor E and none of us have ever experienced difficulty. The problem lies solely in the amount of ingoing and out- going traffic through singular actions or exits, but this is certainly nothing that the parking permit holders add to. I am sure that most of us, if required to move to the other ramp, will drop our parking permit and simply go on a pay as you go basis which means most of us, who arrive prior to 8:00 A. M., will be using first floor parking space. It is hoped that you will give this matter further consideration. WMT&S _ Enclosure very truly yours, ,�. M. &�r cc o William M. Tucker MR. NEIL BERLIN CITY OF IOWA CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS I HAVE A PARKING PERMIT FOR THE CAPITOL STREET PARKING RAMP AND HAVE NOTIFIED THAT AFTER NOVEMBER 2ND I AM TO PARK IN THE LINN STREET RAMP. I REALIZE THAT THE RAMP WAS BUILT TO ACCOMMODATE SNOOPERS IN THE DOWNTOWN AREA. I URGE THE COUNCIL TO RECONSIDER THE ACTION BECAUSE: 1. THE TOP LEVEL ISN'T BEING USED. THEREFORE I COULD MOVE TO THE TOP LEVEL. 2. I WOULD EXPECT THAT MR FOWLER WOULD CHECK THE PERMITS TO MAKE SURE EVERYONE FOLLOWS THE SAME RULES. 3. IT WAS MY UNDERSTANDING THAT THE RAMP WAS TO BE REMARKED AND THE ENTRANCE WAS TO BE REWORKED SO THAT TRAFFIC WOULD MOVE EASILY. IT APPEARS TO MANY OF US THAT THE MOVEMENT OF TRAFFIC IS A BIGGER PROBLEM THAN THE PERMIT HOLDERS FEW SPACES THAT ARE - BEING USED. 4. 1 WOULD URGE THE COUNCIL TO MOVE FORWARD WITH PLANS TO ADD THE ADDITIONAL TWO FLOORS TO THE LINN STREET RAMP. RESPECTFUL �Y,,q -�� rSeS I 1 PARKING PERMIT HOLDER YOU RECENTLY RECEIVVED NOTICE THAT YOU WILL NOT BE ABLE TO PARK IN THE CAPITOL STREET RAMP AFTER NOVEMBER 2ND. CITY STAFF REPORTS INIDICATE THAT THE RAMP USEAGE IS AT THE LEVEL AS LAST DECEMBER. HOWEVER, THERE APPEARS BE ROOM ON THE TOP LEVEL FOR PWRMIT HOLDERS DURING THE HOLIDAY SEASON. PLEASE COMPLETE THE ATTACHED SHEET AND MAIL IT TO NEIL BERLIN, AND CITY COUNCIL, CIVIC CENTER. SINCERE THOMAS H.SUMMY riA/ b1 Ci �aaud 30� � El Ci MR. NEIL BERLIN �--. CITY OF IOWA CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS I HAVE A PARKING PERMIT FOR THE CAPITOL STREET PARKING RAMP AND HAVE NOTIFIED THAT AFTER NOVEMBER 2ND I AM TO PARK IN THE LINN STREET RAMP. 1 REALIZE THAT THE RAMP WAS BUILT TO ACCOMMODATE SHOOPERS IN THE DOWNTOWN AREA. I URGE THE COUNCIL TO RECONSIDER THE ACTION BECAUSE: I- THE TOP LEVEL ISN'T BEING USED. THEREFORE I COULD MOVE TO THE TOP LEVEL. 2. I WOULD EXPECT THAT MR FOWLER WOULD CHECK THE PERMITS TO MAKE SURE EVERYONE FOLLOWS THE SAME RULES. 3. IT WAS MY UNDERSTANDING THAT THE RAMP WAS TO BE REMARKED AND THE ENTRANCE WAS TO BE REWORKED SO THAT TRAFFIC WOULD MOVE EASILY. IT APPEARS TO MANY OF US THAT THE MOVEMENT OF TRAFFIC IS A BIGGER PROBLEM THAN THE PERMIT HOLDERS FEW SPACES THAT ARE•BEING USED. 4. I WOULD URGE THE COUNCIL TO MOVE FORWARD WITH PLANS TO ADD THE ADDITIONAL TWO FLOORS TO THE LINN STREET RAMP. RESPECTFULLY, Michael D. Jones President Michaels I 1 30� f 1 r MR. NEIL BERLIN RECGiYLJ OCf 1 ' 1983 CITY OF IOWA CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS I HAVE A PARKING PERMIT FOR THE CAPITOL STREET PARKING RAMP AND HAVE NOTIFIED THAT AFTER NOVEMBER 2ND I AM TO PARK IN THE LINN STREET RAMP. I REALIZE THAT THE RAMP WAS BUILT TO ACCOMMODATE SNOOPERS IN THE DOWNTOWN AREA. I URGE THE COUNCIL TO RECONSIDER THE ACTION BECAUSE: 1. THE TOP LEVEL ISN'T BEING USED. THEREFORE I COULD MOVE TO THE TOP LEVEL. 2. I WOULD EXPECT THAT MR FOWLER WOULD CHECK THE PERMITS TO MAKE SURE EVERYONE FOLLOWS THE SAME RULES. 3. IT WAS MY UNDERSTANDING THAT THE RAMP WAS TO BE REMARKED AND THE ENTRANCE WAS TO BE REWORKED SO THAT TRAFFIC WOULD MOVE EASILY. IT APPEARS TO MANY OF US THAT THE MOVEMENT OF TRAFFIC IS A BIGGER PROBLEM THAN THE PERMIT HOLDERS FEW SPACES THAT ARE - BEING USED. 4. I WOULD URGE THE COUNCIL TO MOVE FORWARD WITH PLANS TO ADD THE ADDITIONAL TWO FLOORS TO THE LINN STREET RAMP. I RESPECTFULLY, -11 -1 k.• MR. NEIL BERLIN CITY OF IOWA CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS I HAVE A PARKING PERMIT FOR THE CAPITOL STREET PARKING RAMP AND HAVE NOTIFIED THAT AFTER NOVEMBER 2ND I AM TO PARK IN THE LINN STREET RAMP. I REALIZE THAT THE RAMP WAS BUILT TO ACCOMMODATE SNOOPERS IN THE DOWNTOWN AREA. I URGE THE COUNCIL TO RECONSIDER THE ACTION BECAUSE: QTHE TOP LEVEL ISN'T BEING USED. THEREFORE I COULD MOVE TO THE TOP LEVEL. 2. I WOULD EXPECT THAT MR FOWLER WOULD CHECK THE PERMITS TO MAKE SURE EVERYONE FOLLOWS THE SAME RULES. 3. IT WAS MY UNDERSTANDING THAT THE RAMP WAS TO BE REMARKED AND THE ENTRANCE WAS TO BE REWORKED SO THAT TRAFFIC WOULD MOVE EASILY. IT APPEARS TO MANY OF US THAT THE MOVEMENT OF TRAFFIC IS A BIGGER PROBLEM THAN THE PERMIT HOLDERS FEW SPACES THAT ARE - BEING USED. 4. I WOULD URGE THE COUNCIL TO MOVE FORWARD WITH PLANS TO ADD THE ADDITIONAL TWO FLOORS TO THE LINN STREET RAMP. j . RESPECTFULLY, l leo 1,535 0 s%I q) MR. NEIL BERLIN CITY OF IOWA CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS n-•- 033 I HAVE A PARKING PERMIT FOR THE CAPITOL STREET PARKING RAMP AND HAVE NOTIFIED THAT AFTER NOVEMBER 2ND I AM TO PARK IN THE LINN STREET RAMP. 1 REALIZE THAT THE RAMP WAS BUILT TO ACCOMMODATE SHOOPERS IN THE DOWNTOWN AREA. I URGE THE COUNCIL TO RECONSIDER THE ACTION BECAUSE: I. THE TOP LEVEL ISN'T BEING USED. THEREFORE I COULD MOVE TO THE TOP LEVEL. 2. I WOULD EXPECT THAT MR FOWLER WOULD CHECK THE PERMITS TO MAKE SURE EVERYONE FOLLOWS THE SAME RULES. 3. IT WAS MY UNDERSTANDING THAT THE RAMP WAS TO BE REMARKED AND THE ENTRANCE WAS TO BE REWORKED SO THAT TRAFFIC WOULD MOVE EASILY. IT APPEARS TO MANY OF US THAT THE MOVEMENT OF TRAFFIC 1S A BIGGER PROBLEM THAN THE PERMIT HOLDERS FEW SPACES THAT ARE -BEING USED. 4. I WOULD URGE THE COUNCIL TO MOVE FORWARD WITH PLANS TO ADD THE ADDITIONAL TWO FLOORS TO THE LINN STREET RAMP. RESPECTFULLY, U,DLJV9-A'S Shy �c Vk ��cv \ro' lJ �)UQS( VCCS-V\c c qA UDLAV CbCISIUv\ U soak VCAV, UJ\�W 51��es , Z f wou Ic� G �r�w�ev �o�S v\Lou oomenct 40 �c Vk ��cv \ro' lJ �)UQS( VCCS-V\c c qA UDLAV CbCISIUv\ U soak F'. '...; 1983 MR. NEIL BERLIN CITY OF IOWA CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS I HAVE A PARKING PERMIT FOR THE CAPITOL STREET PARKING RAMP AND HAVE NOTIFIED THAT AFTER NOVEMBER 2ND I AM TO PARK IN THE LINN STREET RAMP. I REALIZE THAT THE RAMP WAS BUILT TO ACCOMMODATE SHOOPERS IN THE DOWNTOWN AREA. I URGE THE COUNCIL TO RECONSIDER THE ACTION BECAUSE: 1. THE TOP LEVEL ISN'T BEING USED. THEREFORE I COULD MOVE TO THE TOP LEVEL. 2. I WOULD EXPECT THAT MR FOWLER WOULD CHECK THE PERMITS TO MAKE SURE EVERYONE FOLLOWS THE SAME RULES. 3. IT WAS MY UNDERSTANDING THAT THE RAMP WAS TO BE REMARKED AND THE ENTRANCE WAS TO BE REWORKED SO THAT TRAFFIC WOULD MOVE EASILY. IT APPEARS TO MANY OF US THAT THE MOVEMENT OF TRAFFIC IS A BIGGER PROBLEM THAN THE PERMIT HOLDERS FEW SPACES THAT ARE - BEING USED. 4. I WOULD URGE THE COUNCIL TO MOVE FORWARD WITH PLANS TO ADD THE ADDITIONAL TWO FLOORS TO THE LINN STREET RAMP. RESPECTFULLY, 3aatz i:)G� t'0 IL � MR. NEIL BERLIN CITY OF IOWA CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS J I HAVE A PARKING PERMIT FOR THE CAPITOL STREET PARKING RAMP AND HAVE NOTIFIED THAT AFTER NOVEMBER 2ND I AM TO PARK IN THE LINN STREET RAMP. I REALIZE THAT THE RAMP WAS BUILT .TO ACCOMMODATE SHOOPERS IN THE DOWNTOWN AREA. I URGE THE COUNCIL TO RECONSIDER THE ACTION BECAUSE: 1. THE TOP LEVEL ISN'T BEING USED. THEREFORE I COULD MOVE TO THE TOP LEVEL. 2. I WOULD EXPECT THAT MR FOWLER WOULD CHECK THE PERMITS TO MAKE SURE EVERYONE FOLLOWS THE SAME RULES. 3. IT WAS MY UNDERSTANDING THAT THE RAMP WAS TO BE REMARKED AND THE ENTRANCE WAS TO BE REWORKED SO THAT TRAFFIC WOULD MOVE EASILY. IT APPEARS TO MANY OF US THAT THE MOVEMENT OF TRAFFIC IS A BIGGER PROBLEM THAN THE PERMIT HOLDERS FEW SPACES THAT ARE• BEING USED. 4. I WOULD URGE THE COUNCIL TO MOVE FORWARD WITH PLANS TO ADD THE ADDITIONAL TWO FLOORS TO THE LINN STREET RAMP. RESPECTFULLY, �'W 4/1 c� ,30.? V L 3w) J MR. NEIL BERLIN CITY OF IOWA CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS I HAVE A PARKING PERMIT FOR THE CAPITOL STREET PARKING RAMP AND HAVE NOTIFIED THAT AFTER NOVEMBER 2ND I AM TO PARK IN THE LINN STREET RAMP. I REALIZE THAT THE RAMP WAS BUILT TO ACCOMMODATE SNOOPERS IN THE DOWNTOWN AREA. I URGE THE COUNCIL TO RECONSIDER THE ACTION BECAUSE: 1. THE TOP LEVEL ISN'T BEING USED. THEREFORE I COULD MOVE TO THE TOP LEVEL. 2. I WOULD EXPECT THAT MR FOWLER WOULD CHECK THE PERMITS TO MAKE SURE EVERYONE FOLLOWS THE SAME RULES. 3. IT WAS MY UNDERSTANDING THAT THE RAMP WAS TO BE REMARKED AND THE ENTRANCE WAS TO BE REWORKED SO THAT TRAFFIC WOULD MOVE EASILY. IT APPEARS TO MANY OF US THAT THE MOVEMENT OF TRAFFIC IS A BIGGER PROBLEM THAN THE PERMIT HOLDERS FEW SPACES THAT ARE.BEING USED. 4. I WOULD URGE THE COUNCIL TO MOVE FORWARD WITH PLANS TO ADD THE ADDITIONAL TWO FLOORS TO THE LINN STREET RAMP. RESPECTFULLY, HENDRICKSON ENTERPRISES, INC. i 1230 Old Capitol Center Iowa City, IA 52240 (319)351.3043 J. W. HENDRICKSON aaCCIaFNT 's xxoelefap 5 Center Cbdzr Nell ft—milae gi9)351Swi �� gglgl i m'U sxwx n MR. NEIL BERLIN ou f 1l 1533 ILJJ CITY OF IOWA CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS CITY CLERK I HAVE A PARKING PERMIT FOR THE CAPITOL STREET PARKING RAMP AND HAVE NOTIFIED THAT AFTER NOVEMBER 2ND I AM TO PARK IN THE LINN STREET RAMP. I REALIZE THAT THE RAMP WAS BUILT TO ACCOMMODATE SHOOPERS IN THE DOWNTOWN AREA. I URGE THE COUNCIL TO RECONSIDER THE ACTION BECAUSE: 1. THE TOP LEVEL ISN'T BEING USED. THEREFORE I COULD MOVE TO THE TOP LEVEL. 2. I WOULD EXPECT THAT MR FOWLER WOULD CHECK THE PERMITS TO MAKE SURE EVERYONE FOLLOWS THE SAME RULES. 3. IT WAS MY UNDERSTANDING THAT THE RAMP WAS TO BE REMARKED AND THE ENTRANCE WAS TO BE REWORKED SO THAT TRAFFIC WOULD MOVE EASILY. IT APPEARS TO MANY OF US THAT THE MOVEMENT OF TRAFFIC IS A BIGGER PROBLEM THAN THE PERMIT HOLDERS FEW SPACES THAT ARE•BEING USED. 4. I WOULD URGE THE COUNCIL TO MOVE FORWARD WITH PLANS TO ADD THE ADDITIONAL TWO FLOORS TO THE LINN STREET RAMP. RESPECTFULLY, xp 30.R31 510 MR. NEIL BERLIN .7"3 ijl J CITY OF IOWA CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS CITY CLERK I HAVE A PARKING PERMIT FOR THE CAPITOL STREET PARKING RAMP AND HAVE NOTIFIED THAT AFTER NOVEMBER 2ND I AM TO PARK IN THE LINN STREET RAMP. I REALIZE THAT THE RAMP WAS BUILT TO ACCOMMODATE SHOPPERS IN THE DOWNTOWN AREA. I URGE THE COUNCIL TO RECONSIDER THE ACTION BECAUSE: 1. THE TOP LEVEL ISN'T BEING USED. THEREFORE I COULD MOVE TO THE TOP LEVEL. 2. I WOULD EXPECT THAT MR FOWLER WOULD CHECK THE PERMITS TO MAKE SURE EVERYONE FOLLOWS THE SAME RULES. 3. IT WAS MY UNDERSTANDING THAT THE RAMP WAS TO BE REMARKED AND THE ENTRANCE WAS TO BE REWORKED SO THAT TRAFFIC WOULD MOVE EASILY. IT APPEARS TO MANY OF US THAT THE MOVEMENT OF TRAFFIC IS A BIGGER PROBLEM THAN THE PERMIT HOLDERS FEW SPACES THAT ARE•BEING USED. 4. I WOULD URGE THE COUNCIL TO MOVE FORWARD.WITH PLANS TO ADD THE ADDITIONAL TWO FLOORS TO THE LINN STREET RAMP. RESPECTFULLY, l m 132 iz wu� 3 0;? X J I� Mn MR. NEIL BERLIN L� 0 F 13 CITY OF IOWA CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS CITY CLERK I HAVE A PARKING PERMIT FOR THE CAPITOL STREET PARKING RAMP AND HAVE NOTIFIED THAT AFTER NOVEMBER 2ND I AM TO PARK IN THE LINN STREET RAMP. I REALIZE THAT THE RAMP WAS BUILT TO ACCOMMODATE SNOOPERS IN THE DOWNTOWN AREA. I URGE THE COUNCIL TO RECONSIDER THE ACTION BECAUSE: 1. THE TOP LEVEL ISN'T BEING'LISED. THEREFORE I COULD MOVE TO THE TOP LEVEL. 2. I WOULD EXPECT THAT MR FOWLER WOULD CHECK THE PERMITS TO MAKE SURE EVERYONE FOLLOWS THE SAME RULES. 3. IT WAS MY UNDERSTANDING THAT THE RAMP WAS TO BE REMARKED AND THE ENTRANCE WAS TO BE REWORKED SO THAT TRAFFIC WOULD MOVE EASILY. IT APPEARS TO MANY OF US THAT THE MOVEMENT OF TRAFFIC 1S A BIGGER PROBLEM THAN THE PERMIT HOLDERS FEW SPACES THAT ARE•BEING USED. 4. I WOULD URGE THE COUNCIL 10 MOVE FORWARD WITH PLANS TO ADD THE ADDITIONAL TWO FLOORS TO THE LINN STREET RAMP. RESPECTFULLY, �G'ti�[�, •u, Citit�Lct, '�.—e—r+'� �i�c.. ��—u—.� �'%G4�<iG ,30�� z MR. NEIL BERLIN a OC i� U 3 CITY OF IOWA CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS CITY CLERK I HAVE A PARKING PERMIT FOR THE CAPITOL STREET PARKING RAMP AND HAVE NOTIFIED THAT AFTER NOVEMBER 2ND I AM TO PARK IN THE LINN STREET RAMP. I REALIZE THAT THE RAMP WAS BUILT TO ACCOMMODATE SNOOPERS IN THE DOWNTOWN AREA. I URGE THE COUNCIL TO RECONSIDER THE ACTION BECAUSE: 1. THE TOP LEVEL ISN'T BEING USED. THEREFORE I COULD MOVE TO THE TOP LEVEL. 2. I WOULD EXPECT THAT MR FOWLER WOULD CHECK THE PERMITS TO MAKE SURE EVERYONE FOLLOWS THE SAME RULES. 3. IT WAS MY UNDERSTANDING THAT THE RAMP WAS TO BE REMARKED AND THE ENTRANCE WAS TO BE REWORKED SO THAT TRAFFIC WOULD MOVE EASILY. IT APPEARS TO MANY OF US THAT THE MOVEMENT OF TRAFFIC IS A BIGGER PROBLEM THAN THE PERMIT HOLDERS FEW SPACES THAT ARE•BEING USED. 4. 1 WOULD URGE THE COUNCIL TO MOVE FORWARD WITH PLANS TO ADD THE ADDITIONAL TWO FLOORS TO THE LINN STREET RAMP. RESPECTFULLY, LJp /� �^ y J read � 0.? 31 V. ,\4 J MR. NEIL BERLIN OCT 171983 CITY OF IOWA CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS CITY CLERK _ I HAVE ARKING PERMIT FOR THE CAPITOL STREET PARKING RAMP AND HAV OTIFIED THAT AFTER NOVEMBER 2ND I AM TO PARK IN THE LINN STREET RAMP. I REALIZE THAT THE RAMP WAS BUILT TO ACCOMMODATE SHOOPERS IN THE DOWNTOWN AREA. I URGE THE COUNCIL TO RECONSIDER THE ACTION BECAUSE: 1. THE TOP LEVEL ISN'T BEING USED. THEREFORE I COULD MOVE TO THE TOP LEVEL. 2. I WOULD EXPECT THAT MR FOWLER WOULD CHECK THE PERMITS TO MAKE SURE EVERYONE FOLLOWS THE SAME RULES. 3. IT WAS MY UNDERSTANDING THAT THE RAMP WAS TO BE REMARKED AND THE ENTRANCE WAS TO BE REWORKED SO THAT TRAFFIC WOULD MOVE EASILY. IT APPEARS TO MANY OF US THAT THE MOVEMENT OF TRAFFIC IS A BIGGER PROBLEM . THAN THE PERMIT HOLDERS FEW SPACES THAT ARE•BEING USED. 4. 1 WOULD URGE THE COUNCIL TO MOVE FORWARD WITH PLANS TO ADD THE ADDITIONAL TWO FLOORS TO THE LINN STREET RAMP. RESPECTFULLY, ,30251 3 6po r -� MR. NEIL BERLIN U;I 1 ) ;'83 CIT'! OF IOWA CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS CITY CLERK i I HAVE A PARKING PERMIT FOR THE CAPITOL STREET PARKING RAMP AND HAVE NOTIFIED THAT AFTER NOVEMBER 2ND I AM TO PARK IN THE LINN STREET RAMP. I REALIZE THAT THE RAMP WAS BUILT TO ACCOMMODATE SHOOPERS IN THE DOWNTOWN AREA. I URGE THE COUNCIL TO RECONSIDER THE ACTION BECAUSE: 1. THE TOP LEVEL ISN'T BEING USED. THEREFORE I COULD MOVE TO THE TOP LEVEL, 2. I WOULD EXPECT THAT MR FOWLER WOULD CHECK THE PERMITS TO MAKE SURE EVERYONE FOLLOWS THE SAME RULES, 3. IT WAS MY UNDERSTANDING THAT THE RAMP WAS TO BE REMARKED AND THE ENTRANCE WAS TO BE REWORKED SO THAT TRAFFIC WOULD MOVE EASILY. IT APPEARS TO MANY OF US THAT THE MOVEMENT OF TRAFFIC IS A BIGGER PROBLEM THAN THE PERMIT HOLDERS FEW SPACES THAT ARS BEING USED. 4. I WOULD URGE THE COUNCIL TO MOVE FORWARD WITH PLANS TO ' ADD THE ADDITIONAL TWO FLOORS TO THE LINN STREET RAMP. RESPECTFULLY, Ci MR. NEIL BERLIN OCT 1) 1983 D CITY OF IOWA CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS CITY CLERK I HAVE A PARKING PERMIT FOR THE CAPITOL STREET PARKING RAMP AND HAVE NOTIFIED THAT AFTER NOVEMBER 2ND I AM TO PARK IN THE LINN STREET RAMP. 1 REALIZE THAT THE RAMP WAS BUILT TO ACCOMMODATE SHOOPERS IN THE DOWNTOWN AREA. I URGE THE COUNCIL TO RECONSIDER THE ACTION BECAUSE: 1. THE TOP LEVEL ISN'T BEING USED. THEREFORE I COULD MOVE TO THE TOP LEVEL. 2. I WOULD EXPECT THAT MR FOWLER WOULD CHECK THE PERMITS TO MAKE SURE EVERYONE FOLLOWS THE SAME RULES. 3. IT WAS MY UNDERSTANDING THAT THE RAMP WAS TO BE REMARKED AND THE ENTRANCE WAS TO BE REWORKED SO THAT TRAFFIC WOULD MOVE EASILY. IT APPEARS TO MANY OF US THAT THE MOVEMENT OF TRAFFIC IS A BIGGER PROBLEM THAN THE PERMIT HOLDERS FEW SPACES THAT ARE.BEING USED. 4. I WOULD URGE THE COUNCIL TO MOVE FORWARD WITH PLANS TO ADD THE ADDITIONAL TWO FLOORS TO THE LINN STREET RAMP. RESPECTFULLY, 3oaf� ,�J 311x1 .� CITY -OF IOWA CITY CIVIC CENTER 410 E. WASHNGTON ST. IOWA CITY, IOWA 52240 (319) 356-5000 Date 7/27/83 TO: The Honorable Mayor and the City Council RE: Civil Service Entrance Examination - Maintenance Worker I We, the undersigned members of the Civil Service Commission of Iowa City, Iowa, do hereby certify the following named persons in the order of their standing as eligible for the Position of Maintenance Worker I/Transit Division Ron Bruce Hired - 7/27/83 ATTEST: aA Uty, Clerk IOWA TY CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION r eAl �taa Orelu i Bruce L.Valker John A. Maxwell 3o07,s J 3�b1 CITY OF IOWA CITY CIVIC CENTER 410 E. WASHINGTON ST. IOWA CIN. IOWA 52240 (319)356-5C30 Date 8/22/83 TO: The Honorable Mayor and the City Council RE: Civil Service Entrance Examination - Cashier (PPTa We, the undersigned members of the Civil Service Commission of Iowa City, Iowa, do hereby certify the following named persons in the ?rd of their standing as eligible for the position of IPPT) Cashier/Parking Systems Division Linda Gerlits Hired - 8/22/83 Karen Jones Hired - 8/22/83 Jerome Lewis Hired - 8/22/83 Eleanor Shuh Hired - '8/24/83 IOWA ITY CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION r e is L. Ure1UP Bruce L. Walker . John Maxwell ATTEST: ? City Clerk 3646 l t CITY OF IOWA CITY CHIC CENTER 410 E. WASHNGTON ST. IOWA CITY, IOWA 52240 (319) 356-5= Date 8/25/83 T0: The Honorable Mayor and the City Council RE: Civil Service Entrance Examination - Maintenance Worker I We, the undersigned members of the Civil Service Commission of Iowa City, Iowa, do hereby certify the following named persons in the order of their standing as eligible for the position of Maintenance Worker I/Streets& Sanitation Division William Cole Hired: 8/25/83 ATTEST: t Clerk IOWA ITY CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION Wrea . reup Bruce L. Walker John Maxwell 30v77 50K J CITY OF IOWA CITY CIVIC CENTER 410 E. WASHINGTON ST. IOWA C11Y, IOWA 52240 (319) 356-50 0 Date 9/12/83 TO: The Honorable Mayor and the City Council RE: Civil Service Entrance Examination - Clerk Typist r We, the undersigned members of the Civil Service Commission of Iowa City, Iowa, do hereby certify the following named persons in the order of their standingas eligible for the position of Clerk Typist/Leased Housing Division ' Marsha Henderson Hired - 9/12/83 ATTEST: C ty Clerk IOWA C TY CIVIL SERVI E COMMISSION I r eta L. OrelUp tl Bruce L. Walker John Maxwell 3 Ov?gf CITY OF IOWA CITY CIVIC CENTER 410 E. WASHNGTON ST. IOWA CITY, IOWA 52240 (319) 356-5CM Date 9/17/83 TO: The Honorable Mayor and the City Council RE: Civil Service Entrance Examination - mechanic Il (Transit) We, the undersigned members of the Civil Service Commission of Iowa City, Iowa, do hereby certify the following named persons in the order of their standing as eligible for the Position of Mechanic II (Transit)/Eouinment Gilbert Phelps Hired: 9/17/83 ATTEST: City' Clerk IOWA CITY CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION RMItta L. Ure1UP Bruce L. Walker John Maxwell 30079 ■ 3L CITY OF IOWA HI CITY CMC CENTER 410 E. WASHINGTON NGTON Si. IOWA CffY, IOWA 52240 (319)356-5COo Date 9/19/83 TO: The Honorable Mayor and the City Council RE: Civil Service Entrance Examination - Maintenance Worker I We, the undersigned members of the Civil Service Commission of Iowa City, Iowa, do hereby certify the following named persons in the order of their standing as eligible for the Dosition of Maintenance Worker I/Landfill_ Division Kevin Schmidt Hired: 9/19/83 ATTEST: C t Clerk IOWA ITY CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION r eta L. UrelUp Bruce L. Walker John Maxwell 4 ■ CITY OF IOWA CITY CHIC CENTER 410 E. WASHINGTON Si. IOWA CITY, IOWA 52240 (319) 356-5CC0 Date 9/26/83 TO: The Honorable Mayor and the City Council RE: Civil Service Entrance Examination - Recreation Program Suoervisor We, the undersigned members of the Civil Service Commission of Iowa City, Iowa, do hereby certify the following named persons in the order of their standing as eligible for the position i of Recreation Program Supervisor/Recreation Division i Michael Moran Hired: 9/26/83 ATTEST: City Clerk IOWA CITY CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION rlT l e as L.urelup V Bruce L. Walker John Maxwell J CITY OF IOWA CITY CIVIC CENTER 410 E. WASHNGTON Sf. IOWA CITY, IOWA 52240 (319) 356-.r= Date 10/1/83 T0: The Honorable Mayor and the City Council RE: Civil Service Entrance Examination - cPninr r_lark Tyeict r We, the undersigned members of the Civil Service Commission of Iowa City, Iowa, do hereby certify the following named persons in the order of their standing as eligible for the position of Senior Clerk_ Typist/Planning 8 Program Devel Not.. Lois Burkett Hired - 10/1/83 ATTEST: City Clerk IOWA CITY CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION Arlbtta L. Orelup C/ Bruce L. Walker John Maxwell 3o3z Cr '10; liunorable Mayo and wLy fbuncil ►ll/ Iowa city, Iowa 1111 r 2 01983 We, the undersigned, being the owners of twenty percent CMAkiP+;rlly.iltlneli)g l of the area of the lots included in such proposed change, or oCj(go`e�##n�lI�nelii y adjacent in the rear thereof extending the depth of one lot or not to Oc&- o) two hundred feet therefrom, or of those directly opposite thereto, extending the depth of one lot or not to exceed two hundred feet frcn the street frontage of such opposite lots do hereby protest the rezoning of the following property: r/ •�1-c'[in,,��y .�rJ71E.� � — � ' CUA ./�',-(1�'dyff �-C'--�- �'�j. L��t��,'G x�f gnu/ -�i �ilC l This petition is signed and aclunowledged by each of us with the intention that such rezoning shall not became effective except by the favorable vote of at least three-fourths of all the munbers of the council -in accordance with §114.5 of the Code of Iowa. By: Laev of STATE OF IOWA ) ) ss: JOIDMN COUNTY ) Property Address g3 On this "ay of , 1979, before me,the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said County and State, personally appeared 4 a,} to me known to be the identical pe tis named / In and who executed the within and foregoing instrument and aclulowledged that they executed the same as their voluntary act and deed. By: Cwners(s) of SrXrE OF IOWA ) ss: JOIINSON COUNTY ) of ry Millie in an r„ r the State of Iowa Property Address On this day of , 1979, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said County and State, personally appeared and to ne lmown to be the identical persons named in and wbo executed flue within and foregoing instrument and acknowledwl that they exocuted the sally-, as their voluntary act and deed. Notary Public in and for the State of Tema ,30 33 i '10: llunurahle L13yur and . ,Ly Ibunei 1 Iowa City, Iowa "r:T 2 01983 g percent oiMk&LAN {�eKARR We, the undersi ned being Lhc owners of twenty P or of Gfi�eCiu MMM' of the area of the lots included in such proposed change, adjacent in the rear thereof extending the depth of one lot therel t extendto ing two hundred feet therefrom, or of those directly opposite the depth of one lot or not to exceed two hundred feet frccm tile street pfrfrontage of h OFpOqof the following ontagee ts�iojer7e)jY �l�rote�t�the rezoning '64% 71lis petition is signed and arlmowledged by each of us with the intention ataleasthtlhreenfourtlslofnalltthhe nEmberstofetle counciltin accordance withof §114.5 of the Code of Iowa. py:tlfe ers(s) of STATE OF IOWA ) ) ss: P,12 I property Address JOIRMN CWW ) Q6 On this 7,d day of� c , /W/, before me, the undersi ied, a Notary Public in and for said County and State, personally appeared S and to me imme own to be the identical per n nad in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument and aclmowlecJged that they executed the.same as their voluntary act and deed. 444 f Notal Pubic In and fo the Stat BY: Lmmersts) of Property Address SME OF IOWA ) ss: J JOHNSON OOl1 M ) I192, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Y On this .21-fday of_ Public in and for said County and State, personally appeared n/ee ond to me (mown to be thUua e identical person atha in and uho executed the within and foregoing instrumont and acknowlc�lgctl t they executed the same as their voluntary act and deed. O try Pybllc In ono' fo w� StatC Of henna 10 J CITY OF IOWA CITY CIVIC CENTER 410 E. WASHINGTON ST. IOWA CIN, IOWA 52240 (319) 350-5000 NOTICE THE CITY COUNCIL OF IOWA CITY IS CONSIDERING AN APPOINTMENT TO THE FOLLOWING BOARD: BOARD OF ELECTRICAL EXAMINERS AND APPEALS One vacancy - Four-year term (Representative of the Public) October 26, 1983 - October 26, 1987 Iowa City appointed members of boards and commis- sions must be qualified voters of the City of Iowa City, It is the duty of the Board of Electrical Exami- ners and Appeals to periodically review the Electrical Code and make recommendations thereto to the City Council, to prepare and conduct written and oral examinations, to suspend or revoke any of the licenses or certificates for due cause, to act as board of appeals to hear grievances arising from a decision of the electrical inspector and to pro- vide for reasonable interpretations consistent with the provisions of the Electrical Code. This appointment will be made at the October 25, 1983, meeting of the City Council at 7:30 P.M. in the Council Chambers. Persons interested in being considered'for this position should contact the City Clerk, Civic Center, 410 East Washington. Application forms are available from the Clerk's office upon request. .30-4W /;� C September 27, 1983 Mr. Fred C. Krause, Chairperson Iowa City Housing Commission P.O. Box 2240 Iowa City, Iowa 52244 Dear Mr. Krause: The City Council recently received a request from the Marquette Council of the Knights of Columbus expressing that organization's interest in purchasing the land at the corner of Linn and Harrison Streets for relocation of its current clubroom facilities. This parcel is currently owned by the City and was acquired as part of the Lower Ralston Creek Neighborhood Revitalization Project. Originally, this parcel was to be marketed for private commercial redevelopment. Since the completion of the Lower Ralson Creek Project, however, the City Council has discussed the possibility of utilizing this and other Project parcels for housing sites either for public housing or multiple unit construction by a private developer. Prior to taking any further action in response to the request from the Knights of Columbus, the City Council requests that the Housing Commission review this parcel and make a recommendation as to its relative desirability as a housing site, especially for low and moderate income housing. The City Council will await your recommendation prior to any further consideration of this matter. Sincerely, Mary C. Neuhauser Mayor tp3/8 cc: Neal Berlin Mike Kucharzak J 3oAr Li J Mi haeL �. Lending Box M lvua City, lona 52244 Iona City CouitdZ eideA ona CU* lona Dean City Caunci.Gnen6end; The &Vteife Cormeil o4 #lie IGe4Aid of C040&M ane infenedfed in /a M44 the NdJ l mei 41f pvno4ading the %and of the wmm4 o4 Linn. Siaeef and Hamidon Sfaeef. We 6eUeve #hat Aid propentg id oar a 6y the city. The Ka4Aij of Co4moku ie a norrrPWo U o-VwUpfiwgard we arte P"dw'd4 �O 5 10 a detee to Relomte am haLG Oux !Heade id Aogl d ;to #e, due. me .KeeCved AM OUR maabend. Thid ce rdeg roe ace .tib 40 And out ahat the minlmm peiee uoua 6e 4n AZd cite. Attached .ta Aid !e# you ud.,U dee a &tf*ert deacnibinri uhaf the A4htd o4 Coiv Zud do u"Aa out cm wnu* 3ofes ,L j MEARDON, SUEPPEL, DOWNER & HAYES WILLIAM L. MEAR DON LAWYERS TELEPHONE WILLIAM F. SUEPPEL 122 SOUTH LINN STREET 330•9222 ROBERT N. DOWNER JAMES P. HAYES IOWA CITY, IOWA 52240 AREA CODE JIB JAMES D. MCCARRAGMER THOMAS J. CILEK MARK T. HAMER HOBART THOMAS .LAWS MARGARETT T. LAINSON October 25, 1983 R ANGELA M. RYAN D D DOUGLAS D. RUPPERT 07 2 51983 MARIAN K. KARR Honorable Mayor and Members of the CITY CLERK (3) City Council 410 East Washington Street Iowa City, IA 52240 pear Mayor Neuhauser and Menbers of the City council: This letter Constitutes a protest and objection to the change in zoning proposed by the new ordinance for that area constituting the entire frontage of Bon Aire Nnbile Herne Lodge to a RVE and CII. zone. This protest is filed on behalf of Bon Aire Mobile Home ofthee, Inc. y well as 9bom3s R. Albethasky and Marilynn Alberhasky, It is further the purpose of this letter to reiterate the previous objection made to the inclusion of Bon Aire mobile Home Lodge in a zone known and designated as Rm under the new ordinance. It is the contention of the property owner that the proposed rezoning constitutes an arbitrary and unreasonable vposition of unreasonable regula- tion whidi may be the proper subject of cxPensatorY,da7g ' S•iIM: oma cc: Bon Aire Mobile Home I1 Inc. 305 f A ■ Ci WILLIAM L. MEARDON WILLIAM F. SUEPPEL ROBERT N. DOWNER JAMES P. HAYES JAMES D. MCCARRAGHER THOMAS J. CILEN MARK T. HAMER THOMAS D. HOBART MARGARET T. LAINSON ANGELA M. RYAN DOUGLAS D. RUPPERT MEARDON, SLIEPPEL, DOWNER & HAYES LAWYERS 122 SOUTH LINN STREET IOWA CITY, IOWA 52240 October 25, 1983 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council 410 Fast Washington Iowa City, IA 52240 Dear Mayor Neuhauser and Menbers of the City Council J TELEPHONE 338-0222 AREA CODE 310 "T 2 51983 MARIAN K. KARR CITY CLERK (3) As one of the owners of The Peninsula, a tract of land approximately 200 acres abutted on three sides by the Iowa River and located in Sections 5, 8 and 9, Township 79 North, Range 5 West of the 5th P.M. in Johnson County, Iowa, I wish to object to the proposed rezoning of this area to an agricultural district under the provisions of the proposed new zoning ordinance to Iowa City now before you for your Consideration. This land was zoned as a residential district by the Johnson County Board of Supervisors during October, 1960, and was involuntarily annexed into the City of Iowa City by virtue of a laysuit brought by the City of Iowa City (No. 36866) in the District Court of Iowa for Johnson County. The Petition, which was filed during SepteTber, 1965, and the subsequent court decree entered in Decenber of that year, specifically referred to services to be furnished to the area by the City of Iowa City including fire proection, police protection, street construction, sewage treatment, services for garbage collection, use of a sanitary landfill, water services and utility services. At this time, sane 18 years later, very few of the services referred to in this lawsuit through the form of sworn testiurony have been furnished. The property was annexed on the basis of a residential use and such use was reconfirmed immediately following the Amerex case in 1975. Relying upon the representations made by city officials in and out of Court, the owners of the area did not actively defend the lawsuit, incurred surveying and engineering expenses in preparation of development and had a study and proposed plat of the area showing residential develanpent prepared. These plats were furnished to the city staff as well as the Plan- ning and Zoning Commission after the request was made for such items by city representatives. The City of Iowa City now proposes that this property be placed in a "holding zone" where no development is possible. As the topographical maps 3as� ; I Mayor and City Council Page 2 October 25, 1983 in possession of the city staff will show, a substantial portion of this property cannot be used for agricultural purposes. The terrain is rough and the area has substantial timber growth. The proposed ordinance does, however, subject the property to an "over- lay zone" even though no development is permitted. This is inconsistent, arbitrary and an unreasonable abuse of the police power and a "taking by regulation which is conpensable. The proposal is unfair and confiscatory. Under the circurrstanoss, please regard this letter as: 1. A protest and objection to the proposed rezoning; 2. A request consistent with previous requests made to you in writing and verbally that the property be furnise'hd with the services pursuant to your promises; or 3. That you consider the de -annexation of the property or some other type of appropriate relief. WLM:ama ^.T 2 51983 MARIAN K. KARR CITY CLERK (3) -11 MEARDON, SUEPPEL, DOWNER & HAYES WILLIAM L.MEARDON LAWYERS WILLIAM P. SUEPPEL ROBERT N. DOWNER 122 SOUTH LINN STREET TELEPHONE JAMES P. HAYES JAMES D. McCARRAGHER IOWA CITY, IOWA 52240 338-8222 THOMAS J. CILEN AREA CODE 319 MARK T. HAMER THOMAS D. HOBART MARGARET T. LAINSON ANGELA M. RYAN October 25, 1983 DOUGLAS D. RUPPERT UQ[0 OCT 2 51983 MARIAN K. KARR Honorable Mayor and Members of the CITY CLERK (3) City Council 410 East Washington Street Iowa City, IA 52240 Dear Mayor Neuhauser and Merbers of the City Council: We represent Lorna Mathes who owns the property and resides at 109 South Johnson Street, Iowa City, Iowa. Mrs. Mathes has rented rooms to three unrelated persons for many years. 9ie property has been located in a C-2 zone since 1962. Under the proposed new zoning ordinance, the property is located with the confines of a zone designated Mm2 which prohibits the use of the property which has existed for more than 20 years. It is difficult to understand the "jog to the west" that appears in this particular district or the purpose of such extension. We are told that this is being done because the property is located across from College Green. The use of the property for the last 20 years has obviously not deterred the attraction of this park and the extension of the proposed district under these circumstances would be quite arbitrary and unreasonable particularly considering the conversion of a legal, proper and continued use of the property into a nonconforming use or perhaps even a prohibited use. We contend that the proposed rezoning is not a proper exercise of the police power and constitutes a "taking of property" without compensation. Additionally, it is unreasonable and unfair as Mrs. Mathes depends upon the mom rental for her living. Certainly some consideration should be given to this taxpayer and her zoning should remain the same unless there is some compelling public purpose being served by prohibiting the present use. WLM:ama oc: Lorna Mathes ,J ■ ^..T 2 51983 MARIAN K. KARP, NOTICE OF PRO= CITY CLERK (3) Pursuant to §414.5 of the Cade of Iowa, I, Lorna Mathes, as owner of the following described real estate: The South Eighty-five (85) feet of Lot One (1) of Block Forty-one (41) of Iowa City, Iowa, as shown by the recorded plat thereof, with street address 109 S. Johnson, Iowa City, Iowa hereby protest the proposed rezoning of my property from C2 (comrercial) to RM12. t Lorna Mathes SPATE OF ICWA ss: JOHNSON COUNTY j SUBSCRIBED and sworn to before ne by Lorna Mathes this Z i` day of 19A.4 - i i 3058' I M, 1 MEARDON, SUEPPEL, DOWNER & HAYEs WILLIAM L.MEAROON WILLIAM F. SUEPPEL L-AWYERS ROBERT N. DOWNER 122 SOUTH LINN STREET JAMES P. HAYES TELEPHONE JAMES 0. MCCARRAGHER IOWA CITY, IOWA 52240 038.8222 THOMAS J. CILEN MARK T. HAMER AREA CODE 318 THOMAS D. HOBART MARGARET T. LAINSON October 25, 1983 ANGELA M. RYAN DOUGLAS O. RU PPEgT � � ❑ 12 =' 7 21L'51981'Lif3 i Honorable Mayor and Nrnbers of the city MARIAN K. KARR Council CITY CLERK (3) 410 East Washington Iowa City, IA 52240 Pe: Proposed Zoning Ordinance --Southgate Development, Braverman Development Myles Development and M. N. Braverman Dear Mayor Neuhauser and Members of the City Council: The above owners of a substantial amount of property located within the corporate limits of the City of Iowa city, Iowa, protest and object to the newly proposed zoning ordinance malting the following objections and comments: 1. The City of Iowa City has certain existing agreements with the owners including an agreement referred to as "Broadway Street Agreement" signed March 22, 1978, pertaining to development of Pepperwood Addition, Parts I and II, the terms of which have been or are being performed and upon which they have relied. The rezoning proposed for these districts constitutes an abrogation by the city of the spirit and intent of this agreement. The density requirement of any new zone should not be any more restrictive than the requirement of any zone in effect at the time the agreement was signed. 2. The commercial area in the K -Mart vicinity south of Highway 1 which is subdivided as "Braverman Center" has been developed pursuant to agreement with the City of Iowa City and representations made on behalf of the city. The proposed zoning now changes the requireaents of the developer, changes the permitted uses of the property, changes the density requirements and in general makes the orderly and agreed upon previous development impossible. 3. The Walden tract, located west of Marmon Trek have been developed on the basis of the existing zoning. The partial developmentwhich has already occurred was based upon the existing zoning ordinance as well as representations made by representatives of the city. Since this was a 3 os8 ■ ■ Mayor and City Council Page 2 October 25, 1983 staged development it is inappropriate and unfair for the city to enact a new zoning ordinance for the area referred to above after the expenditure of substantial sums by the property owners. The proposed rezoning of the properties referred to above will result in a reduction of value in excess of two million dollars. In addition, the proposed rezoning does not, when compared to the present zoning, enhance the public safety or welfare from either a practical or aesthetic point of view. Ebr the foregoing reasons, the Property owners object to the imposition of the proposed additional restrictions upon their Dronerty in i -hr fnr of the new proposed city zoni LPIM: ama cc: Southgate Developrmnt Col oarI OCT 2 51983 MARIAN K. KARR CITY CLERK (3) 3oS8 MEARDON, SUEPPEL, DOWNER & HAYES WILLIAM L.MEARDON LAWYERS WILLIAM F. SUEPPEL ROBERT N. DOWNER 122 SOUTH LINN STREET TELEPHONE JAMES P. MAYES 3313.8222 JAMES D. MCCARRAGHER IOWA CITY, IOWA 52240 AREA CODE JIB THOMAS J. CILEK MARM T. HAMER MER THOMAS RT THOMAS MARGARETTT. T. LAI LAINSON October 25, 1983 o a a ANGELA M. RYAN D DOUGLAS D.PUPPERi nrr 2 51983 Honorable Mayor and Members of the MARIAN K. KARR CityCouncil CITY CLERK (3) 410 Fast Washington Street Iowa City, IA 52240 Dear Mayor Neuhauser and Members of the City Council: On behalf of Kenneth L. Albrecht, Wayne Kempf and Earl Yoder Construction Company objection and protest is hereby made to the proposed rezoning of the property owned by them located north of Broom Street, east of Dodge and west of Governor which was the subject of previous rezoning (objected to and which objection is reiterated). The property has been the subject of litigation involving claims for damages by reason of the rezoning which occurred June 27, 1978, and the final trial on this matter will be held on NJVember 28, 1983. This is the same area which has been subject to judicial proceedings previously with a decision that was contrary to the position of the City of Iowa City, Iowa. It is our belief that any rezoning of this area at this time would be unwise and subject to being declared a nullity by reason of the litiga- tion and the proposed rezoning of the property to RM44 and CDl under the new ordinance is not appropriate. WLH:ama cc: Kenneth L. Albrecht Wayne Kempf Earl Yoder Construction Ca 3osB' I Z ■ WILLIAM L. MEAROON WILLIAM F.SUEPPEL ROBERT N. DOWNER JAMES P. HAYES JAMES D. MCCARRAGHER THOMAS J. CILEN MARK T. HAMER THOMAS D. HOBART MARGARET T. LAINSON ANGELA M. RYAN DOUGLAS D. RUPPERT MEARDON, SUEPPEL, DOWNER & HAYES LAWYERS 122 SOUTH LINN STREET IOWA CITY, IOWA 52240 October 25, 1983 7 TELEPHONE 338.9222 AREA CODE 319 r 2 51983 MARIAN K. (CARR CITY CLERK (3) Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council 410 East Washington Iowa City, IA 52240 Dear Mayor Meuhauser and Msibers of the City Council: the property awned by pnnerex Corporation is located immdiately south of Ebrest view mobile Home Court and west of the Laura Drive Connection. 9his property consists of approximately seven acres of land and was the subject of t of together with extensive osts was entered againstresult the City of1ch a Iow�a City, Iowa. $93,000 Iowa. She Court order nvn in effect indicates that 108 units are permitted in this area. If the proposed rezoning the offthels area properly under 0) in any way moder the Court modifies or attempts to changee use order, the purpose of this letter will be to object and Protest such action as well as inform you that it will be the subject of subsequent litigation. wLm:ama 3058' -l' WILLIAM L.MEARDON WILLIAM r. SUEPPEL ROBERT N. DOWNER JAMES P. HAYES JAMES D. McCARRAGHER j THOMAS J. CILEK i MARK T. HAMER THOMAS O. HOBART MARGARET T. LAINSON I ANGELA M. RYAN DOUGLAS O. RUPPERT MEARDON, SUEPPEL, DOWNER IS, HAYES LAWYERS 122 SOUTH LINN STREET IOWA CITY, IOWA 52240 October 25, 1983 Honorable Mayor and City Council Civic Center 410 East Washington Street Iowa City, IA 52240 Re: Proposed Zoning Ordinance Madam Mayor and Members of the City Council: TELEPHONE 339-9222 AREA CODE 319 This letter is written on behalf of the Greater Iowa City Area Apartment Association. The Association members represent a number of apartment units in Iowa City and Coralville. The Apartment Association is deeply concerned with those city policies which directly impact on the availability, cost, location and profitability of rental housing in Iowa City. We are particularly struck with the contradiction between the City Council's stated concern for low cost available housing and the direction of the proposed ordinance which substantially limits density and increases housing costs. Very simply, lower density means higher housing costs. Lower density in Iowa City has occurred in many ways. We have seen the down zoning of the near north side, the Burlington/College Street area and Manville Heights. The floor area/land ratio for roaming houses and fraternity/sorority houses has been increased to the point that there will be no new rooming houses or fraternity houses or expansion of existing ones. Members of the Planning 3 osg Honorable Mayor and City Council October 25, 1983 Page 2 and Zoning Commission have stated that the University must assume more re- sponsibility for providing student housing. Yet, they have spoken with University officials and they have been informed that the University does not intend to provide more housing within the foreseeable future. We disagree with any policy of segregating students from the main -stream of the community. The few isolated problems which may occur in a student community may be solved by enforcement of the noise ordinance, street parking regulations and other existing regulations. Any policy which will cause a virtual exclusion of students from a large segment of residential areas in the community is not in the community's best interest. In April of 1983, parking standards were adopted which increased the dimensional requirements for parking lots, making them more land consumptive. Now, in addition, the City proposes to increase the number of required parking spaces. For example, an apartment of 1,000 square feet currently requires 1.5 parking spaces. Under the new ordinance, it will require 3 spaces. By doubling the size of the parking lot, the cost per unit for construction will increase substantially. i By increasing the parking requirements and the yard requirements, existing structures will not be able to expand because they will be nonconforming. For example, a five foot side yard is presently required for a three story building. Under the proposed ordinance seven feet will be required. This provision will i prevent the conversion of an attic to a third floor apartment in an existing structure. In addition, a 50 foot wide lot is presently required in the R3A and R3B zones. If these areas are rezoned to RM12, a multi -family dwelling is a permitted use but the 60 foot wide lot requirement will frequently make the lot nonconforming. Section 1-70 of the proposed ordinance also provides that a two-family or multi -family dwelling on a nonconforming lot cannot be recon- structed or structurally altered. Structures which cannot be reconstructed or i structurally altered will not maintain their value once the impact of these regulations is fully understood. i A dramatic example of this decrease in density is the duplex which will be rezoned from R2 to RSB. Under the present ordinance, a maximum of 10 unrelated i 3 os? i Honorable Mayor and City Council October 25, 1983 Page 3 persons ive in he cture four ordinance, almaximum tof six uunrelated hpersons awill berking able tolive innder the structure with six parkin proposed 9 places. By increasing the parking requirements and decreasing the number of roomers in a single-family home, many small landlords who have relied upon the income of two or three roomers to meet the rising property tax and utility costs of a large home, will be forced out of business roomer will not justify . The income from one the investment in an additional hard surfaced parking Place on the lot. The elimination of these rooming units also deprives renters of a choice of life style. Many students prefer a quiet room in the � home of an elderly i person they will be forced tosshare tannapartment walking dwith nseveral studentsce from theus. in allarge, noisy student complex. As the small rooming units are closed, rents in the larger complexes will increase. If it is indeed your intent to create exclusive i low density single-family areas with segregated largera apartment co the residents of the city should be informed and they should understand the !complexes long term impact of these policies. The Apartment Association is also concerned with the complexity of this ordinance and the difficulty for the average resident to understand the inter- relationship of the various provisions. For example, how many persons who are considering the purchase of an existing multi -family dwelling in an RM12 zone will understand that, although it is a permitted use, it will almost certainly not comply with all of the parking and yard requirements. As a result, ipursuant to Section 1-70 of the Code of Ordinances, it could not be structurally altered, expanded or reconstructed. In case of fire or tornado, it would have to be replaced by a much smaller conforming structure. IYou are all aware of too many examples where a prospective purchaser was assured by a city housing or building inspector that a particular use was permitted at a particular location, It was only when it was too late that the Purchaser discovered the inter -relationship of the various provisions and that the contemplated use would not be permitted after all. 3os-ow J Honorable Mayor and City Council October 25, 1983 Page 4 We are also concerned with the ambiguities in this ordinance. For ex- ample, Section 1-40 refers to a pedestrian/bicycle path and Section 1-43 to the dedication of land for recreational use, yet the ordinance does not state whether the dedication would be mandatory or voluntary. Will the staff and P 8 Z recommend against an apartment complex if the developer objects to the construction and dedication of a bicycle path along the river? Section 1- 40(c)(2) states that the River Corridor Overlay Zone will insure development that will not impair the public's visual access or the public's view from the river. What impact will this provision have on a particular development? What portion, if any, of a lot can be developed if the entire lot is visible from the river? We are also concerned with the high degree of staff discretion and the increased administrative costs which are built into this ordinance. With the creation of over 25 special exceptions, the staff will administratively review and make recommendations for numerous uses. They will, no doubt, recommend conditions for approval which the Board of Adjustment will generally adopt. At the present time, in appropriate zones, a restaurant or day care facility can be constructed after the approval of building plans by the City Building Inspector. Under the proposed ordinance, a restaurant and day care facility are special exceptions in various zones. As a special exception, construction will necessitate a review and staff report by a planner, a hearing before the Board of Adjustment with a city planner, attorney and secretary present, a written Order by the Board and a potential District Court appeal by neighbors who don't want a child care facility or restaurant in their block. From the perspective of the person who wants to open a child care facility or restaurant, he or she must obtain an option to buy land which will extend until after the date of the Board hearing and the 30 day appeal period to District Court or risk the purchase of land that cannot be used for the intended purpose. An appeal to District Court will effectively force most prospective developers to abandon their plans. If the special exception is approved, the increased cost of constructing the child care facility, for example, will be passed on to the persons who use it. If the special exception is denied, the prospective developer will have '" 3 6.578 J Honorable Mayor and City Council October 25, 1983 Page 5 incurred the cost of obtaining an option on the property, obtaining architect's plans, and presenting evidence at the hearing. The present ordinance, which permits most uses as a right within particular zones, is preferable. The administrative costs of staff reviews and board hearings are eliminated. Prospective developers can purchase property with the certainty that it can be utilized for a particular purpose. Neighbors are not required to attend countless hearings to protect their interests. In many cases, the ability to construct a particular use as a special exception will be illusory. If a sufficient number of neighbors object, the Board will probably not approve the use. There will be a temptation for the staff and the Board to impose excessive and unreasonable conditions in exchange for approval of the use. The prospective developer, who has incurred substan- tial costs in reaching the hearing stage, will be in a poor position to object to these conditions. The certain delays, the possibility of abuse of discretion by the staff and Board, and the potential losses if a use is not approved will inevitably discourage development and harm our community. In addition to the increased number of special exceptions, this ordinance will burden the Board of Adjustment with increased variances. With the increase in nonconforming properties, property owners will have an incentive ito seek relief from the Board of Adjustment. With the increased number of zones, there will be a greater need to apply for a rezoning with a change of use. With the creation of the river corridor overlay zone, the airport overlay zone and the historic preservation overlay zone, additional properties have become subject to staff review. While none of these provisions may be unreasonably burdensome in themselves, the cumulative effect is to increase the city's administrative cost as well as that of the property owner. We ask you to reevaluate the impact of the proposed ordinance upon the community. At a time when large segments of our community are concerned about rising property taxes, providing safe and sanitary low-cost housing, discourag- ing transportation costs and energy consumption, permitting the elderly to ,3os8 Honorable Mayor and City Council October 25, 1983 Page 6 remain in their own homes, and encouraging new industry to come to Iowa City, we must enact an ordinance which will implement these goals rather than frustrate them. We submit that the proposed ordinance is in direct conflict with these goals and we ask you to substantially redraft this ordinance before it is enacted. MTH/zo Very truly yours, /Mr/k!T. am 3aSp l a TELEPHON! 33A-922? AREA CODE 319 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Iowa City, Iowa Civic Center 410 East Washington Iowa City, Iowa 52240 Re: James B. and Elizabeth T. Stroud Dear Mayor Neuhauser, Ms. Dickson and Gentlemen: Our office represents James B. Stroud and his daughter, Elizabeth T. Stroud, who are the owners of the property locally known as 751 West Benton, Iowa City, Iowa, and legally described as follows: Commencing at a point which is 341 feet North, thence 166.5 feet West, thence 235 feet South to said point from the Southeast corner of the NW 1/4 of Section 16, Township 79 North, Range 6 West of the 5th P.M., thence West 177 feet, thence South to a point 30 rods South of the North line of the SW 1/4 of said Section 16, thence East parallel with the North line of said SW 1/4, 177 feet, thence North to the point of beginning. Also, beginning at a point in the center of the road 341 feet North and 166.5 feet West of the Southeast corner of the NW 1/4 of Section 16, Township 79 North, Range 6 West of the 5th P.M.; thence South parallel to the East line of said NW 1/4 235 feet; thence West 185 feet; thence North 235 feet to the center of the road; thence along the center of the road East 185 feet to the place of beginning. The Strouds have requested that we enter an objection on their behalf to the zoning classification of RS8 proposed for this property and request that it be given the zoning classification of RM44, which is applicable to a large tract located to the west and north of the Stroud's property. ,30-5-f MEARDON, SUEPPEL, DOWNER & HAYES WILLIAM L. MEARDON LAWYERS WILLIAM F. SUEPPEL ROBERT N. DOWNER 122 SOUTH LINN STREET JAMES P. HAYES JAMES D. MCCARRAGHER IOWA CITY, IOWA 52240 THOMAS J. CILER MARK T. HAMER THOMAS D. HOBART MARGARET T. LAINSON October 25 1983 ANGELA M. RYAN DOUGLAS D. RUPPERT l a TELEPHON! 33A-922? AREA CODE 319 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Iowa City, Iowa Civic Center 410 East Washington Iowa City, Iowa 52240 Re: James B. and Elizabeth T. Stroud Dear Mayor Neuhauser, Ms. Dickson and Gentlemen: Our office represents James B. Stroud and his daughter, Elizabeth T. Stroud, who are the owners of the property locally known as 751 West Benton, Iowa City, Iowa, and legally described as follows: Commencing at a point which is 341 feet North, thence 166.5 feet West, thence 235 feet South to said point from the Southeast corner of the NW 1/4 of Section 16, Township 79 North, Range 6 West of the 5th P.M., thence West 177 feet, thence South to a point 30 rods South of the North line of the SW 1/4 of said Section 16, thence East parallel with the North line of said SW 1/4, 177 feet, thence North to the point of beginning. Also, beginning at a point in the center of the road 341 feet North and 166.5 feet West of the Southeast corner of the NW 1/4 of Section 16, Township 79 North, Range 6 West of the 5th P.M.; thence South parallel to the East line of said NW 1/4 235 feet; thence West 185 feet; thence North 235 feet to the center of the road; thence along the center of the road East 185 feet to the place of beginning. The Strouds have requested that we enter an objection on their behalf to the zoning classification of RS8 proposed for this property and request that it be given the zoning classification of RM44, which is applicable to a large tract located to the west and north of the Stroud's property. ,30-5-f --, Mayor and City Council October 25, 1983 Page 2 virtually all of the development which has taken place in the vicinity of the Stroud property over the past twenty years has been for multifamily dwellings. The Stroud's property has not been developed up to this time because James Stroudand his wifevedfrom have resided there for many years, although theybeen have this location to the Oaknoll Retifeo�ean orderlycapartmentnt Resiene. it hasdevelopment, their plan to sell this property and the change in zoning classification will have a substantial economic impact upon them, among other considerations. From a development standpoint, it does not appear to be appropriate to notherclassification significantsseparation froabrutlat m ppoint. There iss no no t torrain or that standpoint which would make this a logical point Thereaiswhich sub- ' j shift from single family to ultifamily:oudzonlproperty east which has from the Sti stantial amount of property not been developed, and it would appear unlikely that this property would develop for single family purposes. Highway 1 is located at ! the south end of this undeveloped area, and there has already been a considerable amount of commercial development along Highway 1 at that point. Miller Avenue on the east would appear to us to i point at which to separate the single represent a more logical family and multifamily zones. Because of the configuration of the Stroud's property it would not be possible from an economic standpoint to logically develop this property into single family lots. The property has only a narrow frontage on Benton Street, and the cost of a street the length of the property would be prohibitive. Through a clustering of multifamily structures, however, the propeasonabuldcost. be developed in an aesthetically pleasing Dr. and Mrs. Stroud built their residence on the subject property in the late 1940s and, despite the fact that they have moved from the property, still have a considerable attachment to this home. Having moved only a short distance away, they areconcerned with the orderly development of the area. It does not appear to the Stroud family that this orderly development can occur in an RSB zoning classification and they �oeninne4 infore request manner similar44 atoifica- tion so that the property might bP that provided under the present zc RND/jlb cc: Dr. Ms. and Mrs. James B. Stroud Elizabeth T. Stroud ,36 '8 k9 J Mn o I � M 'CT 2 11983 MARIAN K. KARR REMARKS OF RICHARD W. ZIGCK CITY CLERK (3) For Public Hearing On 1983 Zoning Ordinance And Map October 25, 1983 RM -145 Generally I support the new zone, RM -145, with the less stringent parking of 3/4 parking space per unit for high-rise construction. The history of Iowa City is one of numerous downzonings. of close -in residential areas, new housing fleeing to Coralville with consequent loss in property tax I irevenue, land values for apartments rising to such an extent that apart- ment development goes into commercial and industrial areas, and consequent of all that, proposals for rent control because of rising rents. The center of activity of a large proportion of the population living within a ten mile radius of Old Capitol is the University of Iowa and a large percentage thereof would like to live as close as possible thereto. Politics, being what it is, has not addressed that fact. During the much heralded period of six years of gestation of the proposed new ordi- nance, the Planning and Zoning Commission with some foresight came for- ward largely on their own, I believe, with a proposed new zone, RM -145, to provide for denser housing in certain areas. I do not believe that it should be discarded or watered down for any reason. Some have argued that the mix of uses which have different parking requirements results in pressure on those with more parking in the form of non -tenants using 3es8 REMARKS OF RICHARD W. ZIOCK Page 2 their parking. They say that parking stickers and gates don't work that well. I think that how well they work is a function of enforcement and time and money. I would argue that that is a cost which should be borne by the property owner. Tenants pay extra to live in closer -in areas — if they want parking available whenever — then it is the responsibility of their landlord to make sure their spot is open. It isn't the responsibility of the City to zone the area so that landlords do not suffer minor irritations. Zoning laws are much too restrictive and controlling already; they should not and cannot meet every minor concern. A very liberal high-rise zone, which RM -145 is not, might be harm- ful to existing apartment owners temporarily, at least theoretically. In the present instance this is not the case, however. If it were, there would have been monumental pressure from developers for high-rise zoning, which to Ry knowledge there hasn't been. All larger cities have high- rise zones, in many of which no off-street parking is required. Tenants park on the street, for the most part don't have cars and use public trans- portation. Iowa City is no longer a small town and will find it expedient to adopt many of the features other larger cities have. The long run view favors more dense living in certain areas. It will be more efficient from the vier of the tenants thereof to live closer -in, result in less traffic, 1 stop the property tax drain to Coralville, and lessen pressures for rent control. Furthermore, if developers find it uneconomical to build high - 305"b Cr REMARKS OF RICHARD W. ZIOCK Page 3 rise, then the existence of RM -145 won't make any difference anyway. A New RM -145 Area I wish to propose another area presently shown as RM -44 for inclusion in RM -145. This area is bounded by Myrtle Avenue on the north, the Chicago -Rock Island Railroad on the south, and extends roughly from 100 feet west of Riverside Drive to 400 feet west of Riverside Drive. This area has a convenience store, pizza house, sandwich shop, and Dairy Queen within 100 yards. Additionally, there's a steak house, Chinese restaurant, and gas station within 200 yards. It is slightly over i mile to Old Capitol and downtown. It is served by the Wardxay bus. It is about 400 yards from the new law School which will have about 600 students and less than z mile from the University of Iowa Hospital complex. Across Myrtle Avenue a large tract owned by the University of Iowa is presently undeveloped, but it may reasonably be expected that it will constitute another focus of activity. The case for this area being RM -145 seems equal to the case for the Newton Road area which has RM -145. There is only about one acre undeveloped in this area which could be the site for a high-rise, and it would seem to be a best use for that land. I urge you to amend the Map so. 3 os8 Ci IIIII� n TM i s; October Mayor Mary Neuhauser and the Iowa City Council Civic Center Iowa City, Iowa 52240 Re: Proposed 1983 Zoning Ordinance Dear Mayor Neuhauser and Councilpersons: The Downtown Association Board of Directors voted to request that you give special consideration to an area of the 1983 Zoning ordinance, passed by the Planning and Zoning Commission on September 22, 1983. Our concern is for the future development and growth of the central business district. We are deeply concerned about the lack of available space to grow into as the retail and service establishments grow in number. We feel that the growth of the downtown area is limited in three directions by the consumers natural movements. The two City -owned parking ramps are both on the south side of the present downtown area. We feel that the future growth of the downtown area will naturally move in the direction of available privately owned land, available traffic movements, and (extremely important) the availableand accessable parking. These factors all indicate a movement to the south of Burlington Street. We understand that the CB -2 zone allows for this transition, and that the CC -2 zone will also allow for limited transition due to building size. Therefore, we ask that you consider the long term growth of the downtown area and consider switching the CC -2 zone to CB -2 zone. We feel that this will aid for improved future planning, and a more orderly transition in the future. Once again, thank you for your time and consideration on this matter; and we commend the Planning and Zoning Commission on a long job well done. cSi{'fhrI I Sincerely, �� CxiW 11v9^• ys Tom Muller, President for the Downtown Association of Iowa City Affiliated with the Iowa City Chamber of Commerce 3os8 U 1� el r-. CHARLES A. DARKER JOHN O. CRUISE MICHAEL W. KENNEDY JAMES D. HOUGHTON DAVIS L POSTER BARKER, CRUISE & KENNEDY LAWYERS SII IOWA AVENUE • P.O. DOY 2000 IOWA CITY, IOWA 52244 October 20, 1983 Mr. Douglas Boothroy Planning and Program Development City of Iowa City Davis Building Iowa City, IA 52240 Re: Boyd & Rummelhart Properties Gilbert Street Property Dear Doug: J AREA LODE SIO TELEPHONE 3DI.0101 � o R � @ "T 2 01983 MARIAN K. KARR CITY CLERK (3) I talked to Assistant City Attorney Dick Boyle on the af- ternoon of the 19th about the proposed zoning map last revised September 27, 1983. I am concerned about the zoning boundary line on the Boyd & Rummelhart property that used to be Maiden Lane. The line runs north -south right through the middle of Maiden Lane. I assume the intention is to have the boundary line on the west side of Maiden Lane. Maiden Lane was included in our rezoning request number Z-8310 which passed Council and rezoned the property to R3A. I simply want to be sure that the vacated portion of Maiden Lane goes to the RM44 classification if the new map is adopted. I'd appreciate it if you would resolve this problem and let me know the result. I am sure that we are going to see numerous such problems since no legal descriptions are being used upon adopting the proposed changes. I will file a copy of this letter with the City Clerk to be sure that the objection is included in the public record. Very truly yours, John D. Cruise JDC/dc cc: Boyd & Rummelhart Properties 3os? Ci J n 7 2 51983 MARIAN K KARR CITY CLERK (3) October 25, 1983 Iowa City City Council Civic Center 410 East Washington Iowa City, IA 52240 Re: West Side Co. Councilmembers: The undersigned is the owner of the following described property: Commencing at the Nh corner of Section 20, T 79 N, R 6 W of 5 P.M. Johnson County, Iowa, and the point of beginning; thence due south, 2113.83 feet along the west line of the NEh of said Section 20 to a point on the northeasterly R.O.W. line of Interstate Highway #218; thence continuing along said northeasterly R.O.W. line S 520 50' 05" E, 144.28 feet; thence S 620 19' 42" E, 692.80 feet; thence N 760 14' 11" E, 198.37 feet to a point on the northwesterly R.O.W. line of Iowa Highway #1; thence continuing along said northwesterly R.O.W. line N 400 17' 45" E, 624.68 feet; to a point on the East line of the Wh of the NE4 of said Section 20; thence N 0" 05' 29" E, 2007.93 feet to the NE corner of the NWS of the NE4 of said Section 20; thence S 890 37' 07" W, 1328.44 feet along the North line of said Section 20 to the point of beginning. Said tract containing 70.97 acres more or less. Iowa City City Council October 25, 1983 Page -2- This property is presently zoned C2 and the City proposes to rezone this property CI1. This rezoning is protested pursuant to §414.5 of the 1983 Code of Iowa. In addition, the rezoning is objectionable for the follow- ing reasons: 1.- The rezoning is a taking requiring compensation be- cause: a) the zoning of this property differs from the zoning of surrounding properties, demonstrating a lack of a comprehensive zoning plan, and with no concrete reasons for the zoning; b) the rezoning diminishes the property's value; c) the excluded uses under the new zoning are not a danger to the health, safety, morals, or general welfare of the public; d) the relative gain to the public resulting from the rezoning is disproportionate to the hardship imposed on the undersigned as landowner; e) the property is suited for purposes not allowed by the rezoning; f) the property is being developed in accordance with its present zoning and has only had its present zoning for a short period of time. 2. For the above reasons (a -f), the proposed rezoning is arbitrary and capricious and is a violation of the substantive due process rights of the undersigned. 3. For the above reasons (a -f), the proposed rezoning is illegal, not constitutionally or statutorily au- thorized, and is therefore void and unenforceable. 4. Substantial development plans and work have been in- stituted in reliance on the continuation of the pre- sent zoning and the City is therefor estopped from rezoning the property. 3es8 1 �I Iowa City City Council October 25, 1983 Page -3- 1 5. This property was voluntarily annexed to the City pursuant to an agreement which included zoning speci- fications. The rezoning is a violation of that agreement. Respectfully submitted, EMY/bp oCT 2 51983 MARIAN K. KARR CITY CLERK (3) October 25, 1983 Iowa City City Council Civic Center 410 East Washington Iowa City, IA 52240 Re: Bryn Mawr Heights Development Company Councilmembers: The undersigned is the owner of the following described property: Lot 16 in Part Thirteen, Bryn Mawr Heights, according to the plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 21, page 71, Plat Records of Johnson County, Iowa. This property is presently zoned R2 and the City proposes to rezone this property RSS. This rezoning is protested pursuant to §414.5 of the 1983 Code of Iowa. In addition, the rezoning is objectionable for the follow- ing reasons: 1. The rezoning is a taking requiring compensation be- cause: a) the zoning of this property differs from the zoning of surrounding properties, demonstrating a lack of a comprehensive zoning plan, and with no concrete reasons for the zoning; b) the rezoning diminishes the property's value; ■ Iowa City City Council October 25, 1983 Page -2- 1 2 3. 4 EMY/bp f c) the excluded uses under the new zoning are not a danger to the health, safety, morals, or general welfare of the public; d) the relative gain to the public resulting from the rezoning is disproportionate to the hardship imposed on the undersigned as landowner; e) the property is suited for purposes not allowed by the rezoning; f) the property is being developed in accordance with its present zoning and has only had its present zoning for a short period of time. For the above reasons (a -f), the proposed rezoning is arbitrary and capricious and is a violation of the substantive due process rights of the undersigned. For the above reasons (a -f), the proposed rezoning is illegal, not constitutionally or statutorily au- thorized, and is therefore void and unenforceable. Substantial development plans and work have been in- stituted in reliance on the continuation of the pre- sent zoning and the city is therefor estopped from rezoning the property. Respectfully submitted, Bryn Mawr Heights Development Company arl M. er, President 3058 i J � 0 R � M OCT 2 51983 MARIAN K. KARR CITY CLERK (3) October 25, 1983 Iowa City City Council Civic Center 410 East Washington Iowa City, IA 52240 Re: Bryn Mawr Heights Development Company Councilmembers: The undersigned is the owner of the following described property: Lots 1, 5, 11, and 14 in Part Thirteen, Bryn Mawr Heights, according to the plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 21, page 71, Plat Records of Johnson County, Iowa. This property is presently zoned R2 and the City proposes to rezone this property RSB. This rezoning is protested pursuant to §414.5 of the 1983 Code of Iowa. In addition, the rezoning is objectionable for the follow- ing reasons: 1. The rezoning is a taking requiring compensation be- cause - a) the zoning of this property differs from the zoning of surrounding properties, demonstrating a lack of a comprehensive zoning plan, and with no concrete reasons for the zoning; b) the rezoning diminishes the property's value; 3esf ff, Iowa City City Council October 25, 1983 Page -2- 2. 3. 4. EMY/bp J n C) the excluded uses under the new zoning are not a danger to the health, safety,; afety, morals, or general welfare of the public d) the relative gain to the public resulting from the rezoning is disproportionate to the hardship imposed on the undersigned as landowner; e) the property is suited for purposes not allowed by the rezoning; f) the property is being developed in accordance had its with its present zoning and has only time. present zoning for a short pe For the above reasons (a-f)'the proposed rezoning is arbitrary and capricious and is a violation of the substantive due process rights of the undersigned. For the above reasons (a - f), the proposed rezoning is illegal, not constitutionally or statutorily au- thorized, and is therefore void and unenforceable. Substantial development plans and work have been in- stituted in reliance on the continuation of the from pre- sent zoning andheCity is therefor estopped rezoning property. Respectfully submitted, Bryn Mawr Heights Development 4EarM. By/ ��✓ er, President " ,T 2 51983 MARIAN K. KARR CITY CLERK (3) October 25, 1983 Iowa City City Council Civic Center 410 East Washington Iowa City, IA 52240 Re: Bryn Mawr Heights Development Company Councilmembers: The undersigned is the owner of the following described property: Commencing at a concrete monument which is the southwest corner of Section 16, T 79 N, R 6 W, of the 5th P.M., Iowa City, Iowa; thence N 47034123"E, 162.19 feet to the northeasterly right-of-way line of Sunset Street, and the point of beginning; thence northwesterly 98.43 feet along said north- easterlyright-of-way line of Sunset Street on a 965.00 foot radius curve concave north- easterly, said curve having a chord length of 98.39 feet, bearing N 45°51'10" W; thence N 42055'10" W, 54.13 feet along said northeasterly right-of-way line; thence northeasterly 23.43 feet along a 15.00 foot radius curve concave southeasterly to a point on the southeasterly right-of-way line of Ashley Drive, said curve having a chord length of 21.12 feet, bearing N 1049103" E, thence N 46033155" E, 204.54 feet along said southeasterly right-of-way line to a point being the NW corner of Lot 89, Bryn Mawr Heights Addition Part Two; thence S 16°37127" E, 190.29 feet along the 3ost i Iowa City City Council October 25, 1983 Page -2- westerly line of said Lot 9S to the SW cor- ner of said Lot 89; thence 130.18 feet to the point of beginning. Said tract containing 0.68 acres more or less. This property is presently zoned R2 and the City proposes to rezone this property RS5. This rezoning is protested pursuant to §414.5 of the 1983 Code of Iowa. oning is objectionable for the follow - In addition, the rez ing reasons: 1. The rezoning is a taking requiring compensation be- cause: a) the zoning of this property differs from the zoning of surrounding properties, demonstrating a lack of a comprehensive zoning plan, and with no concrete reasons for the zoning; b) the rezoning diminishes the property's value; c) the excluded uses under the new zoning are not a danger to the health, safety, morals, or general welfare of the public; d) the relative gain to the public resulting from the rezoning is disproportionate to the hardship imposed on the undersigned as landowner; e) the property is suited for purposes not allowed by the rezoning; f) the property is being developed in accordance with its present zoning and has only had its present zoning for a short period of time. reasons (a -f), the proposed rezoning is 2. For the above arbitraryca substantivendue processsand is arights of the M .�I J Iowa city City Council October 25, 1983 Page -3- 3. For the above reasons (a -f), the proposed rezoning is illegal, not constitutionally or statutorily au- thorized, and is therefore void and unenforceable. 4. Substantial development plans and work have been in- stituted in reliance on the continuation of the pre- sent zoning and the City is therefor estopped from rezoning the property. Respectfully submitted, Bryn Mawr Heights Development Company i Bye Earl M. der, President EMY/bp i 7 1_\ adII ,rT 2 51983 MCITY CLER A R 3 834 N. Johnson Iowa City, IA 52240 October 25, 1983 J City Council City of Iowa City Civic Center Iowa City, IA 52240 Re: Proposed Zoning Ordinance and Map Dear Council Members: During the first Council public hearing on October 17th regarding the "proposed zoning ordinance" and the "proposed zoning map adoption," I suggested a change of the proposed RS -8 zoning on the lands near Foster Road, Taft Speedway and North Dubuque Street and the lands north of the proposed Foster Road from North Dubuque Street to Prairie du Chien Road to a multiple zoning called RM -12. The RM -12 zoning is the highest and best use of the prop- erty at this time. Though RS -8 zoning allows duplexes and zero lot line houses up to six units in a row, this type of land use requires flat areas along the roadway of 75 feet to 120 feet in order to accommodate the dwellings. At the same time, the RM -12 zoning allows dwelling units to be built in clusters of two or more and they can be above and beside each other and they can be designed to fit the land ---not remodel the land to fit the dwelling. In the Taft Speedway area the land must be elevated to accommodate dwellings. This can be done without too much disturbance by use of multi -dwellings. In the Foster Road area, between Dubuque and Prairie du Chien Road, the land is rolling with steep slopes and wet ravines between. To flat- ten out this land to accommodate RS -8 dwellings and to lose all the trees and wet areas as a result would be a "rape" of the landscape. There are many other arguments for allowing a different land use in these areas. They are listed below: i -1 Page -2- .-. October 25, 1983 i 1. Transportation. There are very few areas in Iowa City close to the University and available for multi- family housing. These areas are only 12 blocks from the center of Iowa City --"The Old Capitol". They are within bicycling and walking distance to the Univer- sity. The area is served by University Cambus and the Iowa City Transit buses. A person could go to the Memorial Union by canoe. The entire area is ad- jacent to Dubuque Street (a four lane highway) and an Interstate 80 intersection. 2. Sanitary Sewer Service. The terminal point of a sev- en million dollar sewer improvement is Taft Speedway and Dubuque Street. There is no sewer problem for area. ithis 3. Water -Gas -Electricity. All of these utilities are available for these sites. 4. Land Use. When the land is not zoned for its highest and est use, there is a tendency to use it in a way not contemplated in the zoning but as might be other- wise allowed. Without RM -12 zoning some of the area would be used for: jr I A. Churches (a non-taxable use) + H. Schools (a non-taxable use) C. Moved -In Housing - the worst use of land in the history of Iowa City, concentrated in areas close to the University by former zoning de- cisions. 5. Use of the Planned Area Development. The best zoning tool existing in the Iowa City zoning ordinance is the Planned Area Development. Obtaining a PAD is a long, cumbersome, frustrating journey for a land own- er from start to finish, but it does allow the City to know what will be built on the site and the land owner knows what can be built. With the RS -8 zoning density, a PAD is not an economically feasible ap- proach. With RM -12 zoning the area begins to look like a PAD is feasible and amenities such as river front, wooded valleys, streams, etc, can be utilized for the enjoyment of the tenant or owner. ,30S P V 1 Ci r ,J k4 U / OCT251983 CITY CLERIC Iowa City City Council Civic Center 410 East Washington Street Iowa City, Iowa 52240 747 Hest Benton Street Iowa City, Iowa 52240 October 25, 1993 To the Mayor and the Members of the City Council of Iowa City: We submit the following request concerning the rezoning proposals now pending before the City Council. We live at 747 West Benton Street. Our property consists of three acres. It is now zoned R3A and is proposed to be zoned RSB. This letter is prompted by our understanding that a submission will be made on behalf of our neighbor to the west, at 751 West Benton Street. Our western neigh- bor's property Is also three acres, now in the R3A zone and proposed to be included in the RSB zone. Our request is that our property and the propertv of our western neighbor be zoned in the same way, as they' have been in the past. If both properties were pladed'in a zone in which multifamily development is severely curtailed (e.g., ASB), we would have some protection for the continued use of our property as a family home. Alternatively, if both properties were placed in a zone permitting multifamily development (ev., one similar to the present R3A), we would have the potential, as we do under the present zoning, to develop our property in a manner commensurate with ad- �acent developments. If, however, our property were 'down - zoned" while our western neighbor's was not, our property would be devalued for single family residential use and, at the same time excluded from the multifamily development causing the devaluation. We, therefore, request that our property continue to be placed in the same zone as the property at 751 West Benton Street, and that it be zoned to permit the same uses as those approved and/or carried out on the property of our western neighbor. Respectfully submitted, i 'ilium and Barbara Buss 30sd i 1a � R!7f'7;1,!ED 0 1 2 4 1983 PHELAN, TUCKER, BOYLE St MULLEN ATTORNEYS AT LAW LOWS SHULMAN )1000-19N) BNEMGG BUILDING TCLCVNONC WILLIAM V. PHCLAN P. O. Bax 2150 (3ID) 354-1104 WILLIAM M.TucHOR IOWA CITY, IOWA 52244 ' DAN] CL W. BOYLG i CHARLL5 A. MULLCH STCPHCN F. BRIGHT BRuc. L. WALHCR RIGHARG M.TucHER October 20, 1983 THOMAS H.GLLMAN City Council City of Iowa City Iowa City, Iowa 52240 Re: Proposed New Zoning Ordinance - CH -1 Classification Dear Mayor and Members of the City Council: i This letter is being written on behalf of Jomac Development Company the partnership that owns the Highlander Subdivision, the preliminary plat of which subdivision was approved in 1982. The Highlander Subdivision is located East of Highway 218 North of the Highlander Inn and Supper Club. The j preliminary plat of the subdivision was approved subject to finalization of the proposed force main and lift station project which would serve not only the subdivision but the Highlander Motel and Supper Club and the Westinghouse Complex. At present, the subdivision is zoned CH and CO, the CH zoning be applicable to Lots 1, 2, 3, 18, 19 and 20 as shown - on the preliminary plat of the subdivision, those lots being the six lots which were closest to Highway 218. The remainder of the subdivision parcel is zoned CO. The Proposed New Zoning Ordinance would retain roughly the same zoning classification for the subdivision but due to major changes in the uses permitted in the CH Zone would in fact down zone those lots which are currently zoned CH to a point where some of the most desirable uses would no longer be permitted. j?e" 1 C - 2 - The problem has been discussed with Don Schmeiser, the Senior Planner, and as a result of those discussions, I would like to propose the following for your consideration: 1. The permitted uses in the Highway Commercial Zone, CH -1, be expanded to include 'office uses permitted in the CO -1 Zone". 2. That a provisional use be authorized as follows: "retail establishments when associated with the permitted uses of this zone provided that not more than 50% of the total ground floor area shall be devoted to the retail display of merchandise". 3. That the definition of auto oriented uses be expanded to include the convenience store, gas station combinations typified by the QuikTrip, 7 -Eleven, Casey operation. It is my understanding that Don Schmeiser will not resist the above proposed changes to the CH -1 Zone, since I believe it is our mutual feeling that those changes would not affect the integrity of the zone and at the same time would permit the use of the subject property in a manner in which both the Developer and the City desire to see it developed. I intend to appear at the Public Hearing scheduled on October 25th and I will be prepared to discuss the proposed changes further at that time. urs very truly, Charles A. t n CAM/lm cc: Don Schmeiser, Senior Planner Dean Jones Robert McGurk l Testimony Given to Plann_ and Zoning, Commission, Iowa G y October 25, 1983 My name is Susan Horowitz. I live at 1129 Kirkwood Avenue. I have_ reviewed the proposed new zoning ordinance and believe that it Roes far to fulfill the intent of Iowa City's Municipal Code which charges the Planning, and Zoning. Commission to guide and accomplish activities for a "eo-ordinated... harmonious development of the city in accordance with (its) present and future needs". You are to be commended. I do have one concern, however, and that is with Section 1 - 42, page 94: Planned Development Housing Overlay Zone (OPD -H). My concern with this Section lies in the inconsistency between intent and the proposed language. Unlike the other Sections, there is no INTENT clause. Why is this? Also, on page 96, Clause (f) charges the Commission to report to City Council, among other things, that the Final Plan for such an area will not adversely affect nearby properties. Given the existing speci- fications for an application under this Section which require little information regarding impacts on nearby property, it is not clear to me that you nor. future Commission members, will be able to fulfill this requirement. I suggest that the application be accompanied by not only (1) a location map and (2) a preliminary plan of the planned development, but also by "(3) specific evidence that the proposed plan will (a) not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity for the purposes already permitted, and will (b) not substantially diminish and impair property values within the neighbor- hood, and (c) not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding property for uses permitted in the zone, or in contiguous zones, in which such property is located". By "evidence" I suggest the followings • that Clause (a)(2) c. be amended to read, "proposed use of the land (shown by zoning classification that would be most suitable for building, type and population density in the planned development, in an subarea thereof, and in contiguous neighborhoods)". • that Clause (a)(2) d. be amended to read, "Proposed overall population density of the planned development and affected contiguous areas". . that there be created Clause (a)(2) I. to read "Sketches to indicate the proposed hookup with existing water, sewer lines and transportation routes with indicated potential impact on each as well as the proximity to fire and emergency stations". that there be created Clause (a)(3) to read "A chronology of activities taken and results achieved to assure amelioration of rancour amnng citizens residing in contiguous neighborhoods and to assure maintenance of existing values of these properties upon completion of proposed development". One might say such proposed language would impede propress and economic develop- ment of the city. I think not. I think such activities reflect the 1930s, reflect mature attitudes by owners who can only acknowledge that the property is of value because of it's location. Homes to be sold from this property or commarcial facilities to be rented will undoubtedly be accompanied by promotional brochures lauding the nearby schools, day care centers, transportation routes, the character of neighbor- 3osP k '10: Ilunurable tlayur and City founell �L D Iowa City, luwa �f nr f 2 51983 We, the undersigned, being the owners of twenty percent or�iore either of the area of the lots included in such proposed change, or ofv'AD1@uN"JQN. Kq;y adjacent in the rear thereof extending the depth of one lot or BOLT K�¢3) two hundred feet therefrom, or of those directly opposite thereto, exLen the depth of one lot or not to exceed two hundred feet iron the street frontage of such opposite lots do hereby protest the rezoning of the following property:' '9f j,I This Petition is signed and acknowledged by each of us with the intention that such rezoning slhall not became effective except by the favorable vote of at least three-fourths of all the members of the council. in accordance with 0419.5 of the Code of Iowa. thy. " GLf��z ��Owners ) of STATE OF IOWA ss: Jo mii OGUM'y ,,:7:// 72,we-lb A� Property Address 83 On thisny of 1973, before use, the undersigned, a Notary Public in an or said County and State, personally appeared 4 moo � QQ/ (� ahhd� to me known to be the identical pe ns mm�ed in and r who executed the within and foregoing instrument and acknowledged that they executed the scone as their voluntary act and deed. STATE OF IOWA ) ss: JOHNSCH COUMY ) Property Address On this lay of 4�2 _, 197% before me, the and rsigned, a Notary Public in and for said County and State, personally nppe:uredd9 lb e) W d ,ems to no known to be the identical per s named in and who executed the witlhin and foregoing instnmucnt and acknowledged that they executed the s:unu as their voluntary act and deed. Notary iblic in anw for We State of Iowa gest Ci �_' F 9 '10: Ilunarable tlayur and City (uuncil Iowa City, Iowa (�" T 251983 We, the undersigned, hxang the owners of twenty percent 8�' r<i ?,;qy Lit of the area of the lots included in such proposed change, or dfiTLN t IfRely adjacent in the rear thereof extending the depth of one lot or not to e� ) two hundred feet therefrom, or of those directly opposite thereto, extending the depth of one lot or not to exceed two hundred feet fran the street frontage of'sudi opposite lots do hereby protest the rezoning of the following property:' /tCuo-Z ��t«<, off. ' '� ' z . 4L-,4e�v�i ibis petition is signed and aclmowledged by each of us with the intention that such rezoning shall not became effective except by the favorable vote of at least three-fourths of all the members of the council An accordance with 9114 f the Cale of I(zva. By Owne (s) of Property Address SPATE OF IOWA ) ) ss: JOHIMN OQIMY On this cRUday of Or e" , 199. before me, the undersigned, a Notary ikublic in and for said County and State, personally appeared /l,�y4j pJ �( and — to me !mown to be the identical pG ons mm�cd in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument and acknowledged that they executed the s:ur-- as their voluntary act and deed. oU_ary public in anVfor the Stale of Iowa Ouners(s) of Property Address STAIM OF IOWA ) ss: JOHNSM COUMY ) On this _day of , 1979, before me, the undersigned, a Notary public In and for said County and State, personally appeared and to me lmoun to be the identical persons named in and wbo executed the within and foregoing instrument and acknowledged that they dxocuted the rams as their voluntary act and deed. Notary public in and for the State of Iowa 3058