HomeMy WebLinkAbout1983-12-20 Info PacketCity of Iowa City
MEMORANDUM
Date: December 15, 1983
To: City Council
From: Neal Berlin, City Manager
Re: Airport Impact Study
Several weeks ago, Mr. Overman of Howard Green & Associates, Mr. Jansen,
Mr. Zehr, and I met to discuss the airport overlay zoning ordinance impact
study. The study has been expanded to include the entire airport.
Mr. Overman will review the study with the Airport Commission at its next
meeting and then it will be forwarded to the newly established Airport
Zoning Commission before being presented to Council.
The study will identify impacted areas and will address zoning recommenda-
tions. The estimated cost is between $3,500 and $4,000.
tp4/4
r .__... _.MICROF I UIED. BY- ..___..�
JORM .MICR+LAB i
f-CEDAR RAPIDS • DES 14D1NE5 1
3 s�1 fc
CITY
CIVIC CENTER
OF
410 E. WASHINGTON ST
December 9, 1983
IOWA CITY
IOWA CIN, IOWA 52240 (319) 356-5COO
G. W. G. Investments
c/o Allen J. Wolfe
1210 Grant Court
Iowa City, IA 52240
Re: Old Library Property/Response to November 7, 1983 Letter
Dear Mr. Wolfe:
At the November 21, 1983 City Council meeting, the Council requested
additional information concerning the improvements installed :in the Old
Library property. Specifically, the Council desires to know the dollar
value of work completed to -date and, if possible, anticipated or con-
tracted dollar amounts for work specified in the Spring, 1984 plan which
was attached to your November 7, 1983 letter.
Sincerely yours,
Neal G. Berlin
City Manager
be
cc: City Council✓
Robert Jansen, City Attorney
Andrea Hauer, Planning Department
,111CROF1LME6.BY
DORM MICR(�LAS
I
i .CEDAR RAPIDS DEC MOINES
I
3411.5—
A-1
City of Iowa City
MEMORANDUM
Date: December 13, 1983 , /
To: City Council
From:
C2�
From: Dale Helling, Assistant City Manager
Re: Designated Bicycle Lanes
Attached please find a memorandum from the Traffic Engineer and the
Assistant Transportation Planner regarding those issues pertaining to the
designation of bicycle lanes which were raised by Mr. Shelley Plattner
earlier this fall.
As the memorandum indicates actions to be taken in the spring of 1984
would seen to implement changes consistent with those suggested by Mr.
Plattner, with the exception that designated bicycle lanes will remain on
the lefthand side of certain one-way streets.
If you have further questions regarding this matter, please let me know.
This matter is scheduled for informal discussion on December 19, 1983. A
copy of the attached memorandum has been forwarded to Mr. Plattner.
tp3/2
ti
_.._....MICROFILMED BY .._..._.._�. -.
JORM MICR+LAB I
J CEDAR RAPIDS • DEC MOINES
s
i
i
r
I
9
City of Iowa City
MEMORANDUM
Date: November 16, 1983
To: Dale Helling, Assistant City Manager
From: Jeff Davidson, Assistant Transportation Planner
James Brachtel, Traffic Engineer
Re: Your memo of 15 September 1983
In your memo of 15 September 1983, there are three principal areas that Mr.
Plattner has requested be readdressed.
CONFORMANCE OF BIKE LANE DESIGNATION WITH THE MANUAL OF UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL
DEVICES (MUTCD).
As Mr. Plattner has pointed out, the marking technique presently used by the
City for its designated bike lanes is inconsistent with the MUTCD. In the
spring of 1984 the Traffic Engineering Division will change its marking strategy
for the bike lanes. These changes will include a preferential lane diamond at
the beginning of every block of the lane and the use of the words "bike only"
following the preferential lane diamond. The City will also delete the lane
marking 50 feet in advance of the nearside curb line as shown in the various
diagrams in the MUTCD. In addition to this change, the Traffic Engineering
Division will erect preferential lane symbol signs adjacent to these pavement
markings. The Division will attempt to have all of the appropriate preferential
lane signing in place prior to the completion of the pavement marking in the
spring of 1984.
MR. PLATTNER'S ASSERTION THAT IT WOULD BE SAFER TO HAVE NO BIKE LANES THAN TO
HAVE LEFT SIDE LANES ON ONE WAY STREETS.
This matter has been adequately addressed in previous correspondence with Mr.
Plattner. All available materials were discussed in previous correspondence
with Mr. Plattner and with the City Council. No new resource materials have
been discovered in the interim. The MUTCD does not address the planning,
designing or implementing of designated bike lanes. Rather, the MUTCD describes
the manner in which a designated bike lane should be marked and signed in the
event that a designated bike lane is placed on the highway.
CHANGE THE CURRENT "CURB LANE FOR BICYCLES ONLY" TO "BICYCLISTS MAY USE CURB
LANE. "
In the process of erecting the preferential bike lane signs, the Traffic
Engineering Division will be removing all "Curb Lane for Bicyclists Only" signs.
This should resolve Mr. Plattner's concerns regarding the existing signage along
the bike lane facilities.
Should you have any additional comments or questions regarding these matters, we
will be happy to meet with you to discuss them.
bc3/5-6
cc: Charles Schmadeke, Director of Public Works
_.I4ICRDFILMED,BY.
T �
JORM MICR+LAB \1
I
i - CEDAR RINDS • DES MDINCS I
3 V/4
W,
Johnson County Council of Governments
rr 0�410E.Mshng[cn&. bvv0G[y,bm52240
0
Date: December 16, 1983
To: City Council, City Manager, Johnson County Board of Supervisors
From: Cheryl Mintle, Human Services Coordinator
Judson Te Paske, County Planning Director
Re: Joint Human Services Facility Planning
UPDATE ON JOINT HUMAN SERVICES FACILITY PLANNING:
As you know, 11 human services agencies have been pursuing facility consoli-
dation. These agencies include: Community Coordinated Child Care (4 -C's),
American Red Cross, United Way, United Action for Youth, Youth Homes,
Juvenile Diversion, Crisis Center Intervention and Food Bank, HACAP, MECCA,
Mayor's Youth Employment and Independent Living.
After several meetings and researching and visiting several sites we have
arrived at the following three options which we could like to pursue more
fully:
_ 1
E -Purchase of two existing buildings near downtown Iowa City.
-New construction on City property.
It is our plan to use the $5,000 CDBG funds for an architectural and engi-
neering study of these three options. We are in the process of drafting the
specifications for this study prior to requesting bids. As you can see frau
the following schedule time is of the essence.
TENTATIVE TIME TABLE:
December 12 Grant preparation begins.
December 12-16 Design for architectural study completed.
December 19 Grant and match discussed in informal session of Iowa
City Council.
December 20 Grant and match discussed in informal session of
Johnson County Board of Supervisors.
December 22-30 Bids let for architectural study.
January 1-9 Architectural study completed on three options.
Week of January 9 Agency, City, and County meeting to select option and
discuss match.
January 12 Public hearing on application for CDBG funding,
January 18 Grant application due to Opp.
3ell7
Ir
11]Ck0EILiiED.BY I
JORM MICR+LAB
( CEDAR RAPIDS . DES I401NE5
I � _ 3
—1
V�
2
LOCAL MATCH REQuipD 3n:
We also wanted to make you aware of the fact that although there is no
official match requirement, evaluation points are earned for cash match with
50&/508 receiving the top point value. OPP staff has indicated that Iowa
City CDBG, agency rents, and in-kind matches are not eligible as cash match
and would not earn points.
Early next week the Iowa City Council and the Johnson County Board of
Supervisors will be asked to consider cash match ammitments to the project.
Any suggestions related to match or any other aspect of the project would be
welcomed. Please call Cheryl at 356-5242 or Jud at 356-52450 with any
comments or questions.
bj3/8
-_.__..MICROS I LME D, BY...__._ ...
1 _.. .. .
JORM MICR�LAB
fj •11111 11PIDS • DE: MOINES
City of Iowa City
MEMORANDUM
Elate: December 16, 1983
To: City Council and City Manager
From: Frank Farmer, City Engineer
Re: Oakcrest Street Between Sunset and George St.
This section of Cakcrest Street was platted in 1958. As nearly as I can
determine from City records, it was paved between 1958 and 1960, in which
case the paving is 23 to 25 years old.
The design life of paving installed at that time is 20 years. Also, for
your information, the sanitary sewer is located under the center of the
street. This street also serves as a bus route and other streets on bus
routes have had similar problems with pavement breaking up.
After driving the street, although it was difficult to see due to the snow
accumulation, there appear to be minor problems with broken concrete
around the sanitary sewer manholes and at the lowpoint near the storm
intakes. Considering the age of the paving, the street is in fairly good
condition whereupon concrete repair in the areas mentioned should correct
the problem. When weather permits, Engineering will take a more indepth
look at Oakcrest Street for possible repair.
cc: Chuck Schmadeke
be
t '
-'►
.. �. .. MILROFILMEO BY .. __ .... L.
JORM MIOR+LAB l
- ,CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES 1 1
3 ell
^'a
City of Iowa City
MEMORANDUM
Date: December 16, 1983
To: Neal Berlin, City Manager
From: James Brachtel, Traffic Enginee;V
Re: Streetlight on Oakcrest between Sunset and George
EXISTING CONDITIONS
Attached to this memorandum is a drawing showing the existing street -
lighting conditions on Oakcrest between Sunset Street and George Street.
As can be seen, there is a streetlight located on the lot line between the
homes known as 1308 and 1302 Oakcrest. This streetlight is served by an
overhead wire from the overhead rear lot line service to the north. All
three streetlights shown on the attached sketch were installed in 1968.
The current City Council policy for residential streetlight installation
allows for streetlight installation in three areas: 1) the intersection
of two streets, 2) the mid -point of blocks longer than 600 feet, and 3)
the end of cul-de-sacs.
As can be seen, the northern right-of-way line measures approximately 650
feet. Streetlighting on this block would be authorized under the second
criteria of the City Council. The ideal location for a mid -block street-
light would be between the homes addressed as 1302 and 1224. However,
there is no riser pole on the rear lot line between these two homes.
Therefore, a streetlight was installed as close as was possible to the
mid -point but in a position that could take advantage of an existing riser
pole.
ADDITIONAL SIREETLIGHTING EASTERN PORTION
If the City chooses to install a second streetlight in the east portion of
this lot, there are two potential sites: on the lot lines between 1215
and 1211 or on the lot line between 1218 and 1214. The two riser poles
between 1225/1219 and 1224/1220 are too low to provide adequate service to
the front of the lots.
It would appear that the first choice for the City would be between the
homes addressed as 1218 and 1214. The riser pole between 1211/1215 is low
and may provide only marginally adequate clearance over the homes ad-
dressed as 1211 and 1215. If the City chooses to proceed, Iowa -Illinois
representatives will need to obtain an easement from the adjacent property
owners. Once they have an easement from the adjacent property owners, I
will conduct a postcard survey of the affected property owners to deter-
mine if there is an objection to additional streetlighting. If there is no
objection to additional streetlighting, a second streetlight at the east
end of this block could be ordered.
MICROFILNED BY. ,
` JORM MICR+LA6
CEDAR WMOS • OE- MOINES
1
:
4
COMMENT
It appears that the existing streetlighting configuration is in compliance
with the intent of the City Council's policy on residential street—
lighting. A second streetlight installed in the eastern portion of this
block would be more than the Council's stated policy on residential
streetlighting would call for.
bdw4/1
i
i
i
I
I
I
7
:..MILROFILMED.BY-_.__
—
JORM MICR+LAB
-CEDAR RAPIDS • DE: MOINES
i
Y
i
I
i
i i
i
I
i�
ca
-MICRO.rILIIED. BY ...... .
JORM MICR+LAO
�CEDAR RAPIDS - DES MOINES
.IGI
i
r
City of Iowa Citti
MEMORANDUM
Date: December 14, 1983
To: City Council
From: Bruce A. Knight, Associate Planner
RP! Status Report on Acquisition of Property for Foster Road
In the FY84 Capital Improvements Program, $40,000 was allocated for
property acquisition for Foster Road. urve s have
a ecentlyfundsbetnffis
com-
pleted delineating the parcels to be acquired
now planning to obtain an appraiser to establish fair market value of
these parcels and to proceed with their acquisition.
L73
+_... r..�._..-_.._...MICROFILMED.BY._...._._i ...
I DORM MICR+LAB
1\(} WAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES
l _I
N
-a
City of Iowa Citi
MEMORANDUM
Date: December 14, 1983
TO: City Council
From: Bruce A. Knight, Associate Plannerf;4L
Re: Appraised Value of Vacated Alley Right -of -Way Located Between Valley
Avenue and Lincoln Avenue
On August 16, 1983, the Iowa City City Council vacated the north -south alley
right-of-way located between Valley Avenue and Lincoln Avenue. This property
was subsequently appraised on October 3, 1983, by William S. Carlson of the
Iowa Appraisal & Research Corporation for $20,000, or $5 per square foot.
Several of the property owners adjacent to the alley right-of-way have
complained that this is an inflated figure and indicated an unwillingness to
pay this amount.
In the attached letter from Imugene Rohovit, assessed value figures are cited
mately $1.70 to $2.70 per square foot, substantially lower than the apas a comparison with the appraised value. These figures range from approxi -
for the following three reasons: praised
market value of $5 per square foot. However, this difference is misleading
1. In the summer of 1983, Vanguard appraised only commercial properties
(which included multi -family dwellings). All the properties cited in the
attached letter are classified by the assessor's office as residential
uses and were not appraised by Vanguard, but by the City Assessor's
office.
2. The assessor's office bases the assessed value on a "front foot" cost of
the land. In this area, the residential uses are assessed based on a
front foot cost of $250 per foot. The overall assessed value is then
used on the depth of the lot e.g, the first 50 feet of depth is assigned
518 of the assessed value, the next 50 feet 348 and the next 50 feet 158.
by dividing the assessed The value per square foot figures cited by Ms. Rohovit were established
the
on the assessor's technique athe lue 1 land area closer to re the1streetn the lwouldBhave
a higher value per square foot than the land at the rear of the lot.
3. The assessor's valuation of this land is based on its existing use as a
residential property (single family dwelling). The appraiser, on the
other hand, established the market value of this property based on its
"highest and best use... as if vacant and ready for development..." In
this case, the appraiser estimated that the highest and best use would be
for assemblage with the adjoining parcels for future multi -family
residential development in accordance with the existing and proposed
zoning (which the assessor defines as being commercial property). For
multi -family development, added land results in a greater potential
density.
. MICROFILMED BY�_.•_r
l JORM MICR+LAB
I
I CEDAR WPM • D[_ MOINES
I
1
i
In conclusion, the assessed values cited in the attached letter are not a
good indication of the market value of the subject property in relation to
its greatest potential for use. Rather, they are a reflection of the
existing low density residential uses. Furthermore, the appraisal conducted
by Iowa Appraisal & Research Corporation follows an acceptable appraisal
technique of establishing market value based on the use of comparable lard
sales. The transactions used by the appraiser were as follows:
Address Date
34 Lincoln Ave. 5/83
Highway 6/ 5/83
Morengo Rd.
35 Lincoln Ave. 9/82
Land Area Total Cost Price per
(in Sq. Ft.) (thousands of $) Sq. Ft.
16,090 158 9.82
17,748 100 5.63
7,388
77.5 10.49
In addition, the appraiser threw out the land values established by the
purchase of three properties in the same immediate area which had a sales
price per square foot of approximately $12 because "it does not appear that
these most recent sales... can be justified considering the current demand for
new units within the area." Based on the above comparable sales, the
appraiser arrived at an average land value for the sites adjacent to the
subject property of approximately $9 per square foot. The appraiser
noted"...that it may be some time before there is a demand for all the land
adjacent to subject site for some type of multiple family residential
development, and therefore took into the consideration the holding costs
which would be involved until the land would be developed and arrived at the
$5 per square foot figure. It is the staff's opinion that the appraised
value represents a reasonable estimate of the market value of the alley
right-of-way. j
cc: Neal Berlin
Lon Schmeiser
Doug Boothroy
bjl/10
i
i
A
141CROFILI•IED. BY .. _..._..�. _I
JORM MICR+LA9
i -CEDAR RAIDS . DES 1101NE5
i
1 _
3 e/a/
cstd(fA c� o(ffrwn S
724 u ��w �i �f J-3
ct�
a iLu,ho',n•cL —G'L c�cuc,rc,
°,�•3 p.�eOu•�� /a. Cp..e ,'-Zt w nv aut ^7J; /p -Ir!
JyitittV-w.. �i�t� Chest- CJ-.iJ Ol ^ (.�-a'�.PiYtur(. , f
U.w lAingct►s+H/
ao u I c.�J why �ti O0 � 71L �G�we, 3 . �� , �7 ✓aa � 8� � • i
.�W�P.t-L et�e,{�W4.e� �., •�Lu-¢:E/�rnim.I.v � /%�',i �C�i�QUs.re�
Lel
Q/�'>_'� aA.1A-Ll!%u Gtc> e d�J� / n \ �(� a �//•,Y�
OU L�J� il/ i•� / L✓• n M1{q� AML )�/.Ip 10 �•OS/.% � . I,� �VJ71�J�
*)rJ•, r�K, CL„I. Ji,�, GSD f, 3SY iy3 1,,,c /.
• ,C�...J.A.,. a.3' ,;7°.. vtr„ Q+1C,, ��.j, 6 � 0 ��� k i y �•) cu,
d0 3o �, , '
hi ev CE/uxl0, �b0.i Ga.r 7'- ky 3�>
77/ -AL'
/
—2- ! C�� }Ld Q -sv>v -eJ„�1 1r,,.� a Q �l e� X� �+ . rL✓
.�(,'t,C.4.,, ���1-tivai Oa>-u.�- ��uJ I un,un✓���cZ4L rr� •uve,<.vr��O�,,.�Jr"J�L�,,
JN A.Lr.ceC CL;V
r,.. ..._._. .. 14ICROPllME6 BY-.
JORM MICR+LAB `
i CEDAR RPPIDS • DES MOINES
I
3 5Q/
1�
Decenber 15, 1983
To: Iowa City Council
From: Peg McElroy, Director, Mayor's Youth Employment Program
Scott Boyden, President
In RE: Board of Education Representatives
As the regular meeting of the Board of Education in November it was determined
that a representative of the board would not be selected for representation on
the Mayor's Youth Employment Board. This decision was based on current members
being over-extended in service.
The advisory board of MYEP would like to seek representation from the school
community; submit this person's name to the board of education for approval;
and seek final approval from the city council. We believe that the person
selected could keep the board of education apprised of the activities of
MYEP and have the time commitment necessary to serve on our board.
Article III - Membership - Section 3 of the By -Laws states, "Board members
will represent various community interest groups such as Churches, Johnson County
Department of Social Services, Job Service, School of Social Work, Board of
Education, HACAP, Chamber of Commerce, youth representatives, and other groups
deemed to be appropriate." It does not seem to imply that a member of the
board of education must serve on our board although we are in agreement that
it is desirable.
We would appreciate it, very much, if the council would approve the selection
of an interested representative of the school community; not necessarily a
member of the board of education.
Your approval of this matter would be greatly appreciated.
_. .'.. _..._.MICROFILMED K ._._.i
JORM MICR+LAB 1
CEDAR RPPIDS - DES MOINES 1
r '
i
MINUTES —
JOHNSON COuNT'Y—IOWA CITY URBAN FRINGE COMMITTEE
MONDAY, NOVEMBER 14, 1983 4:00 P.M.
IOWA CITY PUBLIC LIBRARY, ROOM B
MEMBERS PRESENT: Donnelly, Ockenfels, McDonald, Erdahl
GUESTS PRESENT: Myers
STAFF PRESENT: Lahey, Franklin, Te Paske
The meeting was called to order at 4:10 p.m. by Donnelly. The minutes of
October 26, 1983 were reviewed and the following revisions were made: 1)
Myers should be shown as a representative for Donnelly; and 2) paragraph 1 on
page 2 should be revised to show that City standards would apply within one
mile of the corporate limits of Iowa City in some areas.
McDonald moved and Ockenfels seconded a motion to approve the minutes as
revised. The motion passed unanimously.
DISCUSSION OF REVISIONS TO 28E AGREEMENT:
Te Paske pointed out that language fran Chapter 93A of the Code of Iowa had
been inserted in the statement of intent on page 1. He then pointed out that
other revisions discussed by the Committee during their last meeting were
also made.
Donnelly questioned how the three year review mentioned in Section III on
page 6 would be initiated. It was suggested that language be inserted in the
agreement stating that a review would be called for by the Chair of the
County Board of Supervisors who would then contact the mayor of Iowa City to
begin the review process.
Myers questioned the exact location of the boundary change in area 8. Te
Paske explained the change. He pointed out that the appropriate land use
break would be at Kitty Lee Road and that the previous designation for area 8
had included some land which was not appropriate for commercial use since it
would directly impact existing residential development. He stated that the
revised boundary lines outlined only those properties north of Highway 1
which were acceptable for commercial development and that the boundary south
of Highway l included the Kirkwood Community College property and 15 acres of
Oakes' property. Te Paske noted that the new limits to area 8 reflected the '
concern of the Board that commercial development be canpatible with residen—
tial uses and that the area then shown for commercial development in the
county was less than that originally proposed.
Donnelly questioned whether the next City Council was bound by a 28E agree—
ment entered into by the present City Council. McDonald responded that
future Councils would be so bound.
Erdahl raised concerns which he had regarding the policy statement for Area
7. He pointed out that there was similar language in other areas but that
circumstances were different in Area 7. The existence of the interchange for
3V.3
i
4
111CROFl UIED. BY
JORM MICR¢LAS i
I CEDAR RAPIDS • DE: MOINES
Urban Fringe Cammittee
November 14, 1983
Page 2
Highway 1 and U.S. Highway 218 and the policy which was being formulated for
Area 8 would in time, possibly five to ten years, serve as an impetus to the
development of rural subdivisions in Area 7. Erdahl stated that the County
could in the future experience significant pressure for development in that
area. He felt that it was not enough for the policy statement to merely
suggest agricultural uses as the preferred use. He pointed out that this
area was markedly different from an area such as Area 4 where extensive RS
zoning had not taken place. Erdahl stated that the Hoard could feasibly
rezone RS zoning within Area 7 now, but that in time development pressures
would make downzoning more politically difficult.
Erdahl pointed out that the City had gone beyond its traditional approach of
intending to annex any developed area outside of the city because of a
feeling that the County could not control that development. He pointed out
that the City Council had become convinced by the Committee members that the
County was taking the initiative to control and manage growth in Area 8 and
that now was the time for the County to consider rezoning property in Area 7
before residential development became a problem there.
Donnelly responded that he thought Erdahl had a valid point, that residential
development could be a problem in Area 7 in the future.
Erdahl stated that the Board could make the changes now, but that in two or
three years after property had changed hands in anticipation of development,
downzoning would be much harder to carry out. He cautioned that any
downzoning would need to be well considered and judicious; he would not
suggest that the Board consider downzoning property where there are existing
roads, but consider those areas where no access currently exists.
Te Paske stated that in terns of planning principals, Erdahl's comments made
sense but that to do any extensive rezoning at this time would be politically
difficult.
Erdahl responded that the County now has assurances from the City regarding
the City's annexation policies for the fringe area, assurances which the
County has not had in the past. If the County were not to rezone parts of
Area 7 and development were to take place, Erdahl pointed out that the City
would be in the position of either having to make a move to annex the land in
order to provide services or the County would be left with having to provide
services. Te Paske responded that he would question whether the costs
imposed on the County would be significant.
Lahey stated that the County Zoning Commission had talked at one time of
approaching property owners in this section of the county regarding rezoning
of their property, but that it had not been done. Erdahl stated that if the
County was interested at all in downzoning the RS area, they should present
that as a possibility and see what reaction they got from property owners. He
stated that it may not be as hard to do politically as may be perceived.
Te Paske responded that at this late date, any major changes in the policy
considerations might threaten the 28E agreement. Erdahl responded that the
City had clearly articulated its concerns and that what happened in Areas 8
1 11ICRONU1ED BY -
JORM MIC R+L AB
CEDAR WPM, . DU MOINES
Urban Fringe Committee
November 14, 1983
Page 3
and 7 would be what was good about the agreement. He stated
had expected all along that the County would do more tha
agricultural use was preferred in this area.
Myers stated that the property that was zoned RS now was not
He pointed out that in contrast to the land in Areas 5 an(
tural land really wasn't that good. Myers felt that Areas
turned around. Erdahl responded that the Committee was t'
line on any further development in Areas 5 and 6 to withim
corporate limits.
Myers stated that U.S. Highway 218 would act as a barrier I
that the Committee should not fear that extensive develop
take place. He stated that the County should definitely n(
land to RS.
Erdahl stated that he would like to have the CSR ratings fol
7 and would like to know exactly where there were existing
Te Paske stated that he felt that three years would be an
time in which to possibly reevaluate the policy for Area
development probably would not take place within the tl ;
Erdahl sated that he wished to have language included in t)
the minutes that it was the perception of the county stat
Area 7 would not develop and that rezoning wa nent a refm
ot necc
suggested including in the Area 7 policy
reevaluation of this area in three years. j
Meeting adjourned 5:30 p.m.
Minutes sutmitted by Karin Franklin.
.. MICROFILMED
JORM MICRILAB
CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES ,
t I
W,e
CITY OF IOWA CITY
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT REVENUE
BOND ISSUES AS OF 12-21-83
Commercial Issues
Issued:
1980 Younkers
1981 Stephens
1981 Lenoch & Cilek
1981 Rosja
1981 Cards et Cetera
1981 Michael J's
1981 Mark Henri
1982 Henri Louis, Inc.
1982 Marcia Kay Roggow
1982 I.C. Brown Bottle
1982 Juceco
1982 Ralston Creek Apt.
1983 The Williams Company
1983 Iowa State Bank & Trust
1983 Pipeyard Partners
1983 Gene Kroeger
1983 Outlot 25 Addition Assoc.
1983 Lyman Addition Assoc.
1983 Viva Investments
Memorandum of Agreement Signed - Bond Sale Pending:
Mid -City Hotel
Application Received:
Gilbert Towers
COMMERCIAL ISSUES TOTAL
Health Care Facility Issues
Issued:
1983 Mercy Hospital
1983 Mercy Hospital, Refunding Bonds
1983 Systems Unlimited
Memorandum of Agreement Signed - Bond Sale Pending:
Wallace, Rosenberger, Hackbarth
HEALTH CARE FACILITY ISSUES TOTAL
$ 1,600,000
100,000
150,000
70,000
100,000
150,000
70,000
95,000
165,000
460,000
100,000
2,000,000
500,000
2,500,000
550,000
225,000
650,000
900,000
500,000
$ 10,885,000
$ 10,000,000
$ 850,000
$ 21,735,000
$ 19,975,000
24,235,000
360,000
$ 44,570,000
$ 619,670
$ 45,189,670
A6
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICR+LAB
CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES
I j
_2_
Industrial
Issues
Issued:
i
1
z
t
1969
1980
I
$ 4,375,000
1982
Thomas & Betts
I
1982
Doe Beverage
f
j
i
I
i
_2_
Industrial
Issues
Issued:
i
1
1969
1980
H.P. Phillips
E.B. & A.C. Whiting
$ 4,375,000
1982
Thomas & Betts
1,500,000
1982
Doe Beverage
5,400,000
1983
Blooming Prairie Warehouse
434,000
1983
Millard Warehouse (Series A)
363,000
1,400,000
1983
Millard Warehouse (Series B)
_ 700,000
INDUSTRIAL ISSUES TOTAL $ 14,172,000
GRAND TOTAL ALL ISSUE TYPES $ 81,096,670
,.MICROFILMED BY._..___._1.
JORM MICR+LAB
CEDAR RAPIDS • BE- MOINES
I
3e,4zel
1
i
1
1
i
j:
I
1