Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1982-08-17 Info Packetr City of Iowa City MEMORANDUM DATE: August 13, 1982 TO: City Council FROM: City Manager RE: Informal Agendas and Meeting Schedule August 16, 1982 Monday 4:30 - 6:30 P.M. Conference Room 4:30 P.M. - Review zoning matters 4:45 P.M. - Public Housing developer selection 5:15 P.M. - Historic Preservation Ordinance 5:35 P.M. - Permanent Structures on City Plaza 5:45 P.M. - City Plaza brick surfacing 6:00 P.M. - Beer and Liquor Permit Suspension Policy 6:10 P.M. - Council agenda, Council time, Council committee reports 6:25 P.M. - Consider appointment to Mayor's Youth Employment Board August 17, 1982 Tuesday 7:15 P.M. - Meeting of City Council Rules Committee - Conference Room Discuss Planning and Zoning Commission Bylaws revisions 7:30 P.M. - Regular Council Meeting - Council Chambers PENDING LIST Discuss Cable TV Commission Recommendations Transit Fare Policy Evaluation of City Attorney Meeting with Riverfront Commission Melrose Court Improvements Dubuque Street Improvements Iowa -Illinois Utilities Franchise Meeting with CCW regarding Citizen Participation Plan Waste Water Treatment Plant Update Discuss Job Evaluation Studies City Council Salaries Inspection of Owner -Occupied Duplexes Review Water Bill Collection Procedures Discuss Alley Paving Policy Appointment to Board of Appeals - August 31, 1982 Appointments to Broadband Telecommunications Commission and Board of Fire and Police Trustees - September 14, 1982 1 MICRorILMED BY ' JORM MICR4LA9 j j CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES ! i 1e139 1 I Cit dt, loviwa City MEMORANDUM DATE: August 6, 1982 TO: City Council FROM: Dale E. Helling RE: Special Informal Meeting of August 9, 1982 The Planning and Zoning Commission, at its meeting on Thursday, August 5, 1982, reviewed the Inner City Area Study and decided to schedule a special meeting to discuss it further before submitting it to the City Council. Therefore, this document is not included in your information packet and discussion will be deferred until a later date. /yyo 1 t MICROFILMED BY Ct JORM-MICR#LA13 1 -1 CEDAR RAPIDS DES MOINES I W. r City of Iowa City MEMORANDUM Date: August 6, 1982 To: City Council 1 From: City �nager Re: Iowa City Transit Facility Project This past Thursday, the City received notification from the Urban Mass Transportation Administration (UMTA) that they have approved our Section 3 application for funding of Phase II Architectural and Engineering services. Phase II activities include preparation of detailed construc- tion drawings and bidding documents. Approval of construction funding is anticipated within a few weeks. This being the case, it is likely that site preparation work could begin yet this fall with actual construction in early spring. UMTA has also indicated that additional funding up to $300,000 might be available. This could increase the total project cost to approximately $2.9 million and permit the construction of a facility more like that originally proposed by the City. We will keep you informed as developments occur. cc: Don Schmeiser John Lundell Mike Prior Rosemary Vitosh bj/sp f' 1 141CROEILMED BY DORM MIC R(�LAEl -� CEDAR RAPIDS DES MOINES I i /yyr 0-4 ,.GER'.9.:EPSEN 101�A jCvitfeb $fates Zonate WASHINGTON. D.C. 20510 n en RECEIVED '''•' ° ::,a August i, 1942 C e CPleal v �/ Berlin City / qV Cty 4ana,er I City Cf Icwa City Icwa City, Icwa 52240 Dear Neal: Thank you for your correspondence regarding :Hass transit facility funding Ccr Icwa City, Icwa. :•Iy office has contacted the Department cf ?lalsin;; an l !Irban DevelcD:nen` ecneernin,', `.'Ie ,ran% +o'�lienticn for T_c.+a Cit1', [oda. As soon asVwe receive any infcr•naticn ccneernin:; this application, we ,.+ill be back in teach with yc,1. iSincerely, I I Vl ;c;er.4. Jepsen United `hates Senntcr H'::J/rwpd /#41ol C MICRDEILMED BY 'DORM MICR#CAB_ CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MDINES I ,� Mr. Neal G. Berlin, City Manager City of Iowa City Civic Center - 410 East Washington Street Iowa City, IA 52240 Dear Mr. Berlin: My office has received a response from the U.S. Urban Mass Transit Administration regarding my inquiry in your behalf. Please find a copy of that reply enclosed. UMTA officials•are awaiting further information from the City before moving ahead with the processing of the application for assistance. My staff will continue to monitor this matter and keep me fully informed. Should you have further questions in the interim, please don It hesitate to contact Mike Ralston in my Waterloo office. Best regards. Sincerely, COOPER EVANS � Member of Congress J CE/mr / y Enclosure �� l IN IOWA. TOLL FRCC NUMOCR 19 1.800.712-17I3 OTHCR COMMUNICATIONS SHOULD OE � DIRECT= TO THE OFFICE INDICATED. [1 317 CANN9N Hou,c O,r¢c Dul=w K 182 W." FwRTN 51.1" ❑ 209 Po,T Orncc D9ILGING WA,NIN9TON. D.C. 00815 WAT ... 1.WA 50708 MA•ON C'". IOWA 50101 (202) 254101 1219) 23"93 (515) 424-3913 I� 141CRor IL14ED BY DORM MICR(�LAB �� CEDAR RAPIDS •DES I401NES ' I ❑ 13 W[R MAIN STR[R MAAD.U.I.WN. 19W4 30155 (SIS) 73Y3172 /yy12- `°MITTS AON Congrm of the Mniteb btatez AGRND ICULTURE COMMITTEE ON AGRICULTURE CONSERVATION. CREDIT, AND COOPER EVANS Pattie of Reprdentatibeg RURALDEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OPERATIONS. TNI.. RESEARCH. AND FOREIGN IOWA 10agym toff, P.C. 20515 ACULWRC CAT. SOYBEANS, AND 9EE0 DRAIN$ �� SELECT COMMITTEE ON AGING pp AI;Q TI HOUSING AND CONSUMER riG��11•CD INTERESTS August 5, 1982 TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT WARD Mr. Neal G. Berlin, City Manager City of Iowa City Civic Center - 410 East Washington Street Iowa City, IA 52240 Dear Mr. Berlin: My office has received a response from the U.S. Urban Mass Transit Administration regarding my inquiry in your behalf. Please find a copy of that reply enclosed. UMTA officials•are awaiting further information from the City before moving ahead with the processing of the application for assistance. My staff will continue to monitor this matter and keep me fully informed. Should you have further questions in the interim, please don It hesitate to contact Mike Ralston in my Waterloo office. Best regards. Sincerely, COOPER EVANS � Member of Congress J CE/mr / y Enclosure �� l IN IOWA. TOLL FRCC NUMOCR 19 1.800.712-17I3 OTHCR COMMUNICATIONS SHOULD OE � DIRECT= TO THE OFFICE INDICATED. [1 317 CANN9N Hou,c O,r¢c Dul=w K 182 W." FwRTN 51.1" ❑ 209 Po,T Orncc D9ILGING WA,NIN9TON. D.C. 00815 WAT ... 1.WA 50708 MA•ON C'". IOWA 50101 (202) 254101 1219) 23"93 (515) 424-3913 I� 141CRor IL14ED BY DORM MICR(�LAB �� CEDAR RAPIDS •DES I401NES ' I ❑ 13 W[R MAIN STR[R MAAD.U.I.WN. 19W4 30155 (SIS) 73Y3172 /yy12- r a U.S.Depariment of Transportation Urban Mass Transportation Administration Ay The Administrator 400 Seventh St., S.W. Washington, D.0 20590 July 23, 1982 The Honorable Cooper Evans Member, United States House of Representatives 162 West Fourth Street Waterloo, Iowa 50704 Dear Mr. Evans: Thank you for your letter on behalf of Iowa City concerning their application for an Urban Mass Transportation Administration (UMTA) grant to partially finance a new mass transit facility. UMTA's Regional Office in Kansas City has received and reviewed the application. At this point, the Regional Office is awaiting the required 13(c) agreement which is expected shortly. Upon receipt of the 13(c) agreement, UMTA will move expeditiously to complete the processing of Iowa City's application. I hope this information is responsive to your concerns. If I can be of further assistance, please contact me. Warm regards. Sincerely, � Arthur. . Teel:e Jr. cc: Washington Office Y mcnrILMED BY 1 _- -"DORM MIC R#LAB� CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES f .1 /yya 0-4 City of Iowa City MEMORANDUM Date: August 5, 1982 To: City C/o�ncil From: City/�1Anager Re: Benton -Riverside Intersection In discussions with representatives of IDOT, it appears that agreement has been reached concerning City Council decisions at the informal Council session of August 2, 1982. IDOT will participate financially in the construction of the fifth lane and the pedestrian light which the City Council has authorized. However, the agreement to be executed between the City and IOOT wi11 place all responsibility for those decisions upon the City. As for the Benton Street portion of the project, IDOT has agreed to completely replace Benton Street east of Riverside with new concrete pavement, and that portion west of Riverside will be reconstructed as necessary based upon the condition of the pavement, and new concrete sections added to the width and the whole area overlayed. While this proposal for the Benton Street portion is a compromise, the City staff believes that it is desirable to proceed with this project without any further delay and recommends that the City Council approve the proposal for the reconstruction of Benton Street. The agreement will be received from IDOT for City Council consideration in approximately two weeks. cc: Chuck Schmadeke Keith Kafer bdw/sp r MICROFILMED BY JORM MICRbLAO CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES I _ J /yf3 r August 4, 1982 V Mr. Dennis Saeugling, Chairman Iowa City Airport Commission 20 Arbury Drive Iowa City, Iowa 52240 Dear Mr. Saeugling: Recently the City was notified that the Urban Mass Transportation Administration of the U.S. Department of Transportation, will provide a grant for the City to build a transit facility. As much as $2 million in federal funds will be provided for this much needed building which will be constructed adjacent to the City's other maintenance facility at the intersection of Highways 6, 1, and 218. As a part of the federal requirements, the City must provide clear title to the property. I have enclosed for the consideration of the Airport Commission a resolution which will clarify the role of the airport relating to that particular land. The City will appreciate your early approval of this resolution in that we expect UMTA to approve the grant within the next two weeks. As always, your cooperation in these matters will be helpful. You may recall that the City Council discussed land issues with the Airport Commission in the past year. The Council indicated its willingness to assist the Airport Commission with development of certain lands at the Airport when the Airport Commission had commercial or industrial interests desiring to develop the land in a manner which would benefit both the Airport Commission and the City. If you have any questions or wish to have additional information for your meeting on August 12, 1982, please contact Dale Helling. Sincerely yours, Mary C. Neuhauser Mayor tp/sp cc: City Council Airport Commission Fred Zehr Bob Jansen 1 141CROEILTIED BY DORM MIC Rb0 CEDAR RAP IDS DCS Id01VE5 C J /#,• V It I r RESOLUTION NO. WHEREAS, the Iowa City Municipal Airport Commission is a duly authorized and acting airport commission established pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 330, Code of Iowa, (hereinafter referred to as Commission) and WHEREAS, the City of Iowa City, Iowa, is a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as City) and WHEREAS, the City wishes to construct a transit facility to be located on a portion of land which may be subject to the management and control of the Commission, said land being included in a larger parcel of land located west of the Iowa River and east of Highway 218, and WHEREAS, said land is held in fee simple title by the City and may be subject to the management and control powers of the Commission conferred on it by Chapter 330, Code of Iowa, for airport purposes, said land being described as follows: All that part lying south of Highway 6, west of the Iowa River and east of Highway 218. and WHEREAS, the City has previously utilized the above-described real estate and entered into possession of same having constructed a city maintenance building thereon and having established a part as public open space thereon, and WHEREAS, the Urban Mass Transportation Administration of the U.S. Department of Transportation will provide a grant to the City for the purpose of providing financial assistance to construct the transit facility and will require proof of unencumbered fee title in the City as a condition of said grant, and WHEREAS, the title of the City may be encumbered by the management and control powers residing in the Commission by virtue of Chapter 330, Code of Iowa, and WHEREAS, in the spirit of harmonious and cooperative relationship with the City, the Commission is willing to relinquish and divest itself of any management and control powers which it may take over and to all of the above-described real estate for the benefit of the City; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Iowa City Municipal Airport Commission does hereby forever relinquish and release to the City all of its right and authority which it may have to manage and control for airport purposes the aforesaid described real estate. Passed and approved this ATTEST: Secretary day of , 1982. Chairman Id lcRorlLnED BY I JORM MIC REILAB- CEDAR RAPIDS • DES M018ES i i /01r/f/ r August 5, 1982 Mr. Warren Dunham, Director Iowa Department of Transportation 800 Lincoln Way Ames, Iowa 50010 Re: State Transit Assistance Allocation Methodology Dear Mr. Dunham: As you know, the City of Iowa City has serious concerns about the system for distributing State Transit Assistance (STA) funds. Most Iowa transit systems believe that the current procedure encourages ingenuity in dreaming up projects rather than sound transit planning. Obviously some type of simplified allocation procedure that is easily calculated and administered is preferable. Therefore it is suggested that the State discontinue awarding STA on a project -by - project basis and instead base the distribution of funds solely on accepted performance indicators. This would considerably reduce staff effort by both the local government and the Transit Division and could be accounted for through the use of existing Uniform Data Management System (UDMS) information. A formula which addresses the three important aspects of a transit system: performance, financial efficiency, and degree of local support should be utilized. The factor addressing performance could be passengers per mile; in other words a system would have an incentive to carry as many riders as possible over an optimum number of service miles. Financial efficiency could be fostered by using a revenue to expense ratio. This ratio encourages increased farebox returns while promoting an efficiently operated system. Finally, Locally Determined Income (LDI) per capita could be used to promote local funding and less dependency on state and federal assistance. LDI is defined as all transit system revenues other than state and federal transit assistance. This item would encourage local support while permitting local policymakers to fund marginal services. All three of these factors could be calculated using the existing UDMS data collection system which all recipients of STA are currently required to use. Further research would have to be carried out in order to determine the proper weight to assign to each item. We feel that this process could be used to equitably distribute STA among all 1.114 s' 7 1 f MICROFILMED By JORM MICR6LAB _1 CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES � a f14 Mr. Warren Dunham, Director Iowa Department of Transportation August 5, 1982 Page 2 the small and large urban transit systems in Iowa. However, a slightly modified formula would have to be used in order to distribute funds among the rural transit systems. We would be pleased to meet with you and your staff to discuss this proposal. Your leadership and assistance in initiating this change would be greatly appreciated. Sincerely yours, Mary C. Neuhauser Mayor bdw/sp cc: City Council John Lundell, Transportation Planner Mike Prior, Acting Transit Manager Nancy Richardson, District Manager rIL14ED BY J^MRO OR J CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MDI4E5 I July 30, 1982 •J Mr. Steven W. Ballou, Executive Director Iowa Department of Environmental Quality Henry A. Wallace Building 900 East Grand Avenue Des Moines, Iowa 50319 Re: Iowa City's Sanitary Sewerage System Facility Plan Dear Mr. Ballou: As we discussed in our recent meeting here in Iowa City, this letter details Iowa City's concern for prompt funding for water pollution control needs and provides historical information concerning our progress. Since the passage of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments (Public Law 92-500) in 1972, Iowa City has embarked on an aggressive program of investigation, analysis, and evaluation of its sanitary sewer collection and treatment system. This work resulted in the completion of Iowa City's Waste Water Facility Plan in October 1979. The plan was subsequently approved by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency on July 7, 1980. The Waste Water Facility Plan recommends the following improvements to eliminate negative environmental impacts (basement flooding, sanitary sewer infiltration, existing treatment plant effluent, etc.) from our sanitary sewer system: Total Federal State City Improvement Cost Share (75%) Share (5%) Share (20%) River Corridor $ 7,000,000 $ 4,988,000 $ 333,000 $ 1,679,000 Sewer Southeast Outfall 11,377,000 8,532,000 568,000 2,277,000 Sewer University Heights 820,000 544,000 36,000 240,000 Sewer Sewer System Rehab 240,000 180,000 12,000 48,000 Work Outfall Relief System 952,000 0 0 952,000 Sewer Improvements Waste Water Treatment 37,600,000 27,637,000 1,842,000 8,121,000 Plant & Related Work Total Cost $57,989,000 $41,952,000 $ 2,796,000 $13,241,000 l 1, MICRorIL14E0 er JORIM "MICR6LAB ! CEDAR RAPIDS DES MDI;VES Mr. Ballou July 30, 1982 Page 2 All Improvements The City has proceeded with, and Federal and State funding has been provided for, the construction of the corridor sewer project and design of all other projects listed above. As an indication of our progress, 'the various stages toward development and implementation of the Waste Water Treatment Plan are listed: Date Completed Stage (or Anticipated Completion Date) 1. Infiltration Inflow Analysis November 1976 2. Waste Water Treatment System Plan June 1978 3. Sewer System Evaluation Survey May 1979 4. Waste Water Facility Plan October 1979 5. University Heights Sewer (Design) July 1981 6. River Corridor Sewer (Construction) November 1981 I 7. University Heights Sewer (Construction) December 1983 1 _ f 8. Waste Water Treatment Plant (Design) - -•--October 1982 9. Southeast Outfall Sewer (Design) June 1983 10. Sewer System Rehabilitation Work (Design) June 1983 11. Outfall Relief System Sewer Improvement (Design) June 1983 12. Items N8 through #11 (Construction) January 1986 The City has received federal grants (75%) for Items N1 through N6 and N8 through H10, and applied for a Step 3 grant for Item #7 in July 1981. It now appears, however, that Iowa City will not be able to proceed with the construction of the waste water treatment plant or the various interceptor sewer projects because of the City's status on the State priority list. All of the City's projects are presently scheduled for funding beyond FY 1984. We, in Iowa City, believe that the Department of Environmental Quality should reconsider our City's status on the priority list, for the following reasons: 14W MICROFILMED BY I I I JORM IMICR46LA9 - 1 1 � CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOVIES ' r ILL r Mr. Ballou July 30, 1982 Page 3 EXISTING WASTE WATER TREATMENT PLANT The existing trickling filter treatment plant, constructed in 1935 and presently operating above capacity, has deteriorated substantially. Examples of the physical condition of the plant are as follows: crumbling of the structural concrete, failure of mechanical equipment such as the bar screen rake, raw sewage pumps and arms on the trickling filter distributors, and corrosion of the clarifier weir trough supports. In addition, the plant is located in a commercial area less than 4,000 feet from the Central Business District and is bounded by the Iowa River, Ralston Creek, Highway N6, and the Crandic Railroad, thus making it difficult if not impossible to expand or improve the existing facility. In fact, Iowa City's E.P.A. approved facility plan recommends a new waste water treatment plant located downstream as the most cost effective approach to providing adequate treatment. EXISTING SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM The original sanitary sewer collection system was constructed around 1890 and additions have been made to the system as the City grew. The system includes approximately 133 miles of sanitary sewers, ten pumping stations and two lagoons. The Sanitary Sewerage Facility Plan recommends improvements on five (5) major trunk sewer systems. The Rundell Street Trunk Sewer is an example. This sewer surcharges causing extensive sewer backup into residences, inflicting property damage, and representing a potential health hazard. It serves a population of 14,290 or 29 percent of Iowa City's total population. The most cost effective method of correcting this condition is to construct the Southeast Interceptor Sewer System. SERVICE AREA Iowa City's Sanitary Sewerage Facility provides collection and treatment of waste water from the City of University Heights and the University of Iowa. In fact, the University Heights Sewer System Project is a direct result of our commitment to continue providing sewerage service to University Heights. This is a requirement of EPA. The University of Iowa contributes about one-third of the total flow received at the treatment plant. The waste water flows from University Heights and the University of Iowa inhibit the City's ability to adequately treat sewerage at the present time and greatly increase the cost of our proposed waste water treatment plant. STATEWIDE BENEFIT The University of Iowa currently has a research and teaching lab located at Iowa City's waste water treatment plant. This lab is used by engineering students, many of whom have never before witnessed a waste water treatment process. It is important that these students who leave Iowa City to work in other areas of the State, have a sense of the State of Iowa's commitment to a clean environment and first-hand knowledge'of a properly constructed, well-managed facility, meeting effluent limitations established by E.P.A. and D.E.Q. 111CROEILMED BY JORM MICR46LAB -� CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOIYES iyyie Y about its ability to continue to ste water in the near future because sanitary sewerage system facilities. )rt is crucial for Iowa City. Your reatly appreciated. IAICROEILRED BY 1 1 DORM MICReLAB" CEDAR RAPIDS DES MOINES /-/If q a City of Iowa City MEMORANDUM DATE: August 5, 1982 lo: City Manager and Council FROM:, Douglas Boothroy, Senior Planner,, RE: Supporting Information for East Area Development Policy A first draft of the Development Sequence section of the Comprehensive Plan Update is being sent to you in conjunction with the East Area Development Policy. Hopefully, this city-wide view of a proposed phased development policy will clarify development issues currently under consideration in portions of the City. The Development Sequence explains staff analysis of a phased growth policy for short-range residential development. Assumptions, method- ology and findings, along with short- and long-range maps, are presented in the report. 1 i iyy7 % 111CROEILIIED BY JORM MICR¢LAB -� � CEDAR RAPIDS •DES IAOI4ES /r I i LL r 1V. OEVELOPMENT SEQUENCE 1 The sequence of development has been determined for residential land uses based on an analysis of criteria which include the overriding sewer capacity issue, appropriate developability factors and overall- urban design considerations. A land use development sequence serves as a guide for both public and private development in that a five year capital improvements program coupled with a phased growth plan will predictably and cost-effectively allow the City to expand in an efficient manner while allowing private developers an opportunity to anticipate the community's future growth pattern. A short-range development sequence for residential growth in Iowa City has been prepared. (See Map 1.) Two phases are depicted with existing developable areas comprising the current (1980-85) phase. Phase I (1985- 90) and Phase II (1990-95) extend areas available for development as major infrastructure improvements are made and the new WPCP is constructed. Map 2 outlines those areas which may not develop until the long-range and for which capital improvements have not been programmed. Assumptions In analyzing the various areas within the City to determine an appropriate se�*ence ,of development, the following assumptions/conditions have been made: 1. The new WPCP will be completed during the Phase 11 '(1990-95) time period. 2. Capacity problem in the Rundell Street/"horseshoe" sewer are a development constraint for portions of the City. 3. The current availability of sewer service without added capital improvements for sewers adds to the development potential of an area. 4. The cost of major capital improvements in an area, which act as an incentive to development is an important factor. 5. Providing growth areas in all sectors of the community is desirable, if possible, giving landowners more equitable opportunities to develop their land. 6. Providing enough land to support projected population increases and housing needs is a necessary criteria. 7. Existing school capacity in developing areas is an important concern but secondary to the availability of sewer and the proximity of growth .to existing development. 8. Areas which can accommodate the greatest population (i.e., sewer capacity available, accessible location, existing school capacity, etc.) for the least costs in capital improvements are considered highly developable. /41/7 j� MICROFIL14ED BY JORM MICR6LAE3 CEDAR RAPIDS • DES 1401NES � 9. Proximity to existing development governs the sequencing of development. Methodology City-wide, all undeveloped land has been divided into areas based largely on boundaries previously used in the Area Analyses and the demands of sewer availability. These areas have been ranked using a weighted score based on costs of capital improvements, policy issues, service costs and physical/locational factors which influence the desirability of certain areas to develop before others in order to foster cost effective, compact and contiguous urban growth. (See Table 1.) Based on the score an area received in the ranking process, a preliminary phased sequence for the short-range has been proposed. (See Table 2 and Map 1.) This sequencing has been analyzed to determine: 1. Location of developable areas; 2. Acres of land available; 3. Sewer capacity and people per acre figures based on findings in the Developable Land Report; 4. Potential population the area could accommodate if built at this people per acre capacity. (When estimating population, a conservative 15 people per acre factor has been used in those instances where either sewer capacity is relatively unlimited or is at a very high people per acre figure. This 15 people per acre figure is consistent with the proposed WPCP capacity which has been sized for an overall average residential density of 15 people per acre. 5. Anticipated capital improvement costs to encourage or facilitate an area's development. Findings Analysis of the results of the proposed phasing for the short-range shows that currently, the City has 333 acres of Newly Developing land which could support a developable without any capital improvements byopulation of 3,657 eole. �lthe City except for ese reas are raswater line to one area. Areas designated for Phase I (1985-90) development comprise 274 acres which could potentially support 3,465 people. Capital improvements would involve upgrading current sewer lines, providing new water lines, and condemning land for a proposed trafficway. These improvements, however, will provide substantial developable land, prior to construction of the new WPCP, which does not impact the Rundell Street/"horseshoe" sewer problem. Therefore, given the Newly Developing ares and Phase I areas, the City can provide development opportunities in three quadrants of the City, support an additional 14 years of growth based on a growth rate of 500 people per year, and not exacerbate the current sewer surcharge problems experienced in portions of the City. 14107 p � �. MICRon L10 BY J0FIM MIC ROLA S l CEDAR RAPIDS • DES 1101. 0-4 Phase II (1990-95) areas anticipate the new WPCP and concurrent trunks coming on-line and opening the East area and portions of the Northeast and South areas for development. Besides the WPCP, minimal capital improvements are necessary to facilitate development in these areas while providing an additional 714 acres which may accommodate a potential population increase of 12,260 people. (See flap 1) Areas represented on the long-range map (see Map 2) will probably not be needed for residential growth until after the year 2000. Substantial capital improvements for sewer, water and trafficways would be needed for development to occur in these areas. r II]CRDEILMED BY If "JORM-MICROLA13 f CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES I 1OV7 ----�-. J L.DNq RANy� V it �1 1 s 6 i ,e i i I i I 1 MICROFILMED DY �J JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS •DES MOINES i LL � J PtuSE T (195.90 � PhmE wi N MICROFILMED By j JORM MICR4�LAB I j CEDAR RAPIDS •DES t40IRL5 a Lt b1, I I . � TABLE I u SCORING UNDEVELOPED AREAS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT SEQUENCE I C.I.P. WEIGHT WPCP 4 Sewer Main Trunks 3 Upgrading 2 Water Main Trunks 2 ' Upgrading 1 Streets (Arterial Std.) 1 CRITERIA WEIGHT Policy Issue Compact & Contiguous -3 Non -compact & Non-contiguous 3 Service Costs Schools 2 Parks 1 Transit 1 Physical Factors Pedestrian Access to CBD 1 Commercial Areas 1 Topography .5 Environmental Constraints .5 Natural/Manmade Barriers .5 * Low score equals priority development 1fV7 �. MICROFILMED BY " DORM MIC RC1LAa ,F... J i✓\� � � CEDAR RAPIDS DES'MOINES LL �ri1- IF' TABLE 7 - SHORT -RANGE PPA Sewer Potential C.I.P. Location Acres Capacity Population Needed Newly Developing Areas: (1980-85) Sherwood Forest 46 unitd. @15 690 Hwy. 1 64 85, @15 960 Miller Park Willow Creek 40 9 360 Aber Park S. Rohret Rd. 33 9 297 W. of Mormon 80 9 720 Trek Blvd. E. of Mormon 40 9 360 Trek Blvd. Ty'n Cae 30 9 270 12" water 333 3657 Phase I: (1985-90) W. of Prairie du Chien 134 12 1608 Condemn Foster Rd. Upgrade sewer Near South Area 81 12 972 12" water Upgrade Keokuk sewer Englert Tract Area 59 unitd., @15 885 8" water 12" water 274 3465 i Phase II: (1990-95) W. portion of NE Area 260 22 5720 12" water WPCP N. of Muscatine 72/79 34/88,@15 2265 12" water S. of Muscatine 135 13 1755 S. Gilbert Area 168 unitd.,@15 2520 714 12,260 TOTAL 19,382 @500 people/yr. = 38.8 years of growth LONG-RANGE I. E. of Prairie du Chien 2. Far NE Area 3. South Area 4. Peninsula 5. E. of Freeway 218 6• W. of Freeway 218 - including Hunter's Run 1 MICRUIL14CD BY JORM MICR6LAB- CEDAR RAPIDS DES MOINES I S /'/f/7 1 r City of IowatCit� Date: August 5, 1982 To: City Council From: Doug Boothroy, Senior Planne Re: Development Policy for the East and Northeast Portions of Iowa City Pending Construction of the Water Pollution Control Plant The following policy statement and implementation strategy are presented in response to the Council's request on July 26 for a refinement of the development options outlined for the East and Northeast areas. This policy reflects the Council's concerns that the surcharge problem in the "horseshoe" system be recognized and not exacerbated further, but that development in the East and Northeast areas be allowed to continue to some extent. The statement is designed to serve as a*separate statement from the development sequence of the Comprehensive Plan and fulfill a need to address the unique sewer capacity problems of the East and Northeast areas. It is recommended that the Council undertake an annual review of the surcharge problem and proceed with the implementation strategy to ensure that development is not increasing the surcharge problem to an intolerable extent and to ensure compliance with the legal requirements of a staged growth policy. Policy Statement Development of those areas in which the sewers empty into the "horseshoe" trunk system may occur to the extent that surcharge conditions within the "horseshoe" system are minimized. Development will be controlled through the implementation strategy stated below. The City will encourage, as a general policy, the development of areas which will not impact the "horseshoe" system, through capital improvements programming. Implementation Strategy Stage 1: Development may occur on any properties which have received preliminary or final platting approval, and/or which fall within the Business Development, Inc.. and Plum Grove Acres, Inc. agreements with the City. -South of Muscatine Avenue development may occur as stated above, with the following additional constraints: a. The Village Green and Heinz lift stations shall be timed so as not to pump concurrently and development shall be limited to the existing capacities of the respective lift stations. OR b. The flowage from the Village Green lift station shall be diverted to the Heinz lift station and the capacity within the MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR6LAE3 1 CEDAR RAPIDS DES 1101YES I /yyg 1 W• n Heinz lift station shall be allocated proportionally, with 45% of the capacity (202.5 gpm) allocated to BDI and 55% (247.5 gpm) to Village Green. Review of this stage shall take place within one year of the adoption of the policy, and annually thereafter, to determine the status of the surcharge condition in the "horseshoe" system and whether implementation of the policy should advance to stage two. Stage 2: . Further development within the policy area shall take place only with the provision of an alternative waste management system by the City. Stage 3: No development shall take place except with the provision of an approved private waste management system. cc: Neal Berlin Robert Jansen Chuck Schmadeke Don Schmeiser bj2/12-13 1 :4ICRDIIU4ED BY JORM-MICR4�LA9` CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOVIES I 1 f� 0.4 ADDITIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND EST114AIED FL0WAGE TO HORSESHOE SYSTEM UNDER STAGE ONE Development Acres Platted or Covered Estimated Additional by Agreements Flowage* BDI (as constrained by 60.8 ac 420 gpm Heinz lift station) Village Green 14.6 45.4 Iowa City Housing Project 2.86 acres 8.9 gpm Waters 1st Addition 1.6 4.9 Oakes Meadow 7.5 23.4 Plum Grove Acres c. 100 acres 312 gpm Highlander lift station c. 105 acres 200 gpm 292.36 acres. Additional flowage to"horseshoe" system 1014.6 gpm *Industrial - 10,000 gal./acre/day or 6.9 gal./acre/min. Residential- 300 gal./capita/day or .208 gal./capita/min. (assume 15 people/ - acre density) 1' 'I I4ICROElLI4ED BY � I -JORM MICR46LA13 CEDAR RAPIDS DES 1401NES II LL , AlOdIr I/ PROPERTIES PLATTED OR SUBJECT TO AGREEMENTS micROEllMED By I JORM MICRbLA9 1 CEDAR RAPIDS DES 1101YES I r City of Iowa City MEMORANDUM Date: July 28, 1982 To: City Council and City Manager � From: Frank Farmer, City Engineer ' J'/704 . C>4 Re: Dearborn Street/Center Avenue/Rundell Street Stormwater Drainage Problem Attached are two memos, one from October of 1976 and one from March of 1981, concerning the drainage problem at Dearborn Street and Center Avenue. The cost estimates have been updated to today's costs. The 1976 estimate is designed to handle only a five year storm as per design standards and will pond water dependent upon depth of water and creek channel. The 1981 estimate is designed to handle a 100 year flood with moderate ponding and the use of a lift station. If the lift station should fail, the stormwater would back up until the lift station was again operative. Jim Hencin, CDBG Coordinator, is also looking at this creekside area for possible future improvements using block grant funds. bdw3/14 Attachments 1 MICROrILMED BY 1 DORM MIC RbLAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES I i i 141019 CITY OF 103 CITY DEPARTF;_NT OF PUBLIC 1?OAKS MEMORANDUM DATE: (October 19, 1976 TO: Gone Diet=, City rngincer FROM: Fr::nk Fa n;cr, Ciril Engineer � ✓r RE: Storm hater at Center Avenue and Dearborn Street Problem: Water ponding too deep at the intersection of Center Avenue and Dearborn Street. Reason: Two inlets at low point in intersection are required to drain 27 acres. This produces a flow of 31 cfs. in a five (5) year storm. The pipe and inlets at this location working at their peal: will only carry 2.7 cfs. The flow in a two (2) year storm is 23 cfs. Another reason is that the top of curb at this point is only four (4) feet above the dry flow line of Ralston Creek. Ralston Creek is only 475 + feet away from this intersection and the top of the creek bank is approximately six (6) feet above the top of curb at the low point of this inter- section Correction: To carry the flow of a five (5) year storm, 33" R.C.P. is needed. Because Rundell Street has to be crossed this is too large, therefore, two 22 x 36" arch pipes at 0.2€ or four (4) 21" circular pipes. The rough cost using arch pipe, two RA -S inlets, one special manhole and pavement and sidewalk removal and replacements would be $95,000 for construction in 1983. This design will carry a five (5) year storm as long as Ralston Creek is not over four (4) feet deep. The water in the intersection will still be approximately one (1) foot deep. Attached is a plat showing the existing storm sewer and the drainage area. FF:bz iyy9 i 141CROE1U4ED BY I JORM MICR6LAE3 ) r CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MONE5 f� I , aIM'. r, i Ofi7RBORN i IdINi�`� r,irolr,:,R� :: I b� ; V n� I �. Iu N �' �i •A 4 12, Y 0 b o •. L' Ofi7RBORN i IdINi�`� r,irolr,:,R� :: o b� V n� �. Iu N ♦:: tv � ♦ ♦ r, ro tu; MICROFILMED BY I i JORM MICRIJL AB 1 CEDAR RAPIDS •DES Id01 HCS r City of Iowa City MEMORANDUM Date: March 4, 1981 To: Charles J. Schmadeke, City Engineer From: Lee J. Tippe, Civil Engineer Re: Center Avenue/Rundell St./Dearborn St. Stormwater Drainage Problem Since February 6, I have been studying the above-named problem and have been developing a design solution. I am to the point where I can offer a proposal for a storm sewer network and a lift station. This includes design criteria, capacities and costs. What follows is a summary of my work to this point. To begin, the drainage basin in question was analyzed for the 100 -year and 5 - year storms. This analysis was made using an assumed intake layout. The initial locations for these intakes were determined essentially by inspection. Since the intersection at Center Avenue at Dearborn St. has severe flooding problems, roughly half of the intakes were located here. Other principal locations were the existing low point on Rundell Street and on 7th Avenue. Design flows to the intakes were determined using the rational method. Refer to my file if you have any questions. After determining design flows to the intakes, the sizes and interception rates of these were found. To size an intake, the depth and width of gutter flow to the intake were computed, and then several intake sizes were checked for interception and bypass. Then, the intake requirements to intercept a 5 -year design flow were found. An intake size was then picked based on the intake not being too oversized for a 5 -year design flow while getting good interception of the 100 -year design flow. The intake network is probably close to a 10 -year design size as a result of this method. Upon finalizing intake sizes and locations, the storm sewer network needed to connect the intakes with each other and with the creek was laid out. As much as possible, pipe and manholes were placed in the street so that trees in the parking would not be uprooted. Refer to layout for details. The next step was sizing the mainline portion of the storm sewer network. As with the intakes, the rational method was used for the 5 -year and 100 -year design flow. Design points were manholes at the upstream end of a given length of mainline pipe and these moved progressively downstream. The result for each section of mainline was the peak flow that that section would have to carry during the given design storm. The mainline pipes were sized to carry the 5 -year storm under gravity conditions. The downstream portions were sized to flod 2/3-3/4 full. Then, the 100 -year storm was analyzed through the network to determine the extent of flooding at the low point in the streets. The pipe grades and/or sizes were then adjusted to allow the 100 -year storm to be carried while the system was surcharged. The mainline will still be under gravity conditions during the 5 - year storm. Grades and sizes were adjusted after it was determined that a lift station was needed. This allowed deeper excavation and steeper pipe grades. Refer to file calculations for additional details. 1 141CROf ILMED BY JORM MICR46LAO j CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES i'/si9 1 J Pa After sizing the mainline, connector pipes were designed from the mainline manholes to the individual intakes. Design flows were found by summation of the intercepted flows. Achieving adequate cover and 5 -year capacity were the main considerations. The last series of steps involved sizing a lift station suitable for both the 5 - year and 100 -year storm conditions. The rational method peak flows (from mainline calculations) and the vente chow hydrographs were compared and combined. From these, peak flows, low flows and average flows were determined. Limited catalog information was available on low head -high volume pumps; I did manage to find a fairly suitable one in the "Flygt" catalog. The wet well for the station was sizing and resizing by trial and error. Capacity, running times, filling times and cycle times were used to check this. Finally, a cost estimate was developed. As follows: 1. Storm sewer plan including intakes, manholes, :sMF 43=68 $118,700 and removal -replacement of P.C.C. 2. Lift station `P3 BFSF88 78,000 TOTAL PROJECT COST PROPOSED ::VM;Z74;aa $196,700 If you have any questions, the complete calculations and commentary are in my file. bjl/1-2 /yy9 RlteorluaED BY i JORM MICR46LA13 - -� I CEDAR RAPIDS DES MOINES C !� r City of Iowa City MEMORANDUM Date: July 30, 1982 To: Neal Berlin From: Frank Farmer Re: Construction Costs for Scott Boulevard Improvements - Court Street to Rochester Avenue Construction costs for Scott Boulevard improvements - Phase I (Highway 6 to Muscatine Avenue) and Phase II (Muscatine Avenue to Court Street) were finaled out at $121 per foot and $120 per foot respectfully. Scott Boulevard - Phase III (Court Street to Rochester Avenue) is approximately 4500 lineal feet, plus an additional estimated 400 feet for extending Washington Street to the new alignment of Scott Boulevard. Using an 8.5 percent cost increase per year for the last two years, increases the cost estimate to $142 per lineal foot or $695,800, for construction during 1983. Engineering costs for design and inspection would add another $20,000 to $30,000. Additional right-of-way would be required along the entire section of Phase III improvements and has not been included in this cost estimate. bdw4/4 11ICRDEILI4ED BY JORM MICRbLAB- CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES Ii _ A 1yso 1 City of Iowa City MEMORANDUM DATE: August 13, 1982 TO: City Council FROM: City Manager RE: Material in Friday's Packet Memorandum from the Assistant City Manager regarding College Street City Plaza Extension. Memorandum from the City Engineer regarding Library Plaza Brick Proj Memoranda from the Assistant City Manager: 1 a. Permanent Structures on City Plaza (m<mo b. Iowa -Illinois High Voltage Transmission Line c. Staffing of Resources Conservation Commission Copy of letter from the Executive Director, Iowa Department of Environmental Quality, in reply to Mayor Neuhauser's letter regarding funding for the waste water treatment plant. 141, Copy of letter from Mr. 0. R. Woods, Vice President of Crandic Railway Company, in reply to City Manager's letter regarding condition of railroad crossings in Iowa City. Copy of memorandum from the City Manager to Committee on Community Needs regarding human services funding. J Memorandum from the City Clerk regarding conditional approval of beer license. /�15 Memorandum from the Housing Coordinator regarding proposals for public housing. Letter from John Cruise representing G14G Investments regarding additional information on the bid for the Old Public Library. _.Ly Information regarding hotel -motel tax across the State of Iowa. /` Copy of letter from Committee on Community Needs to .•1r. Jim Hynes regardin Creekside flooding problems. Copy of official notice from Johnson County Health Department to Mr. John/y Wakefield regarding Star Port Bar. Police Department monthly report for July 1982. Articles: a. Will Ames become energy -policy leader? b. Why balance bill means unisex toilets. ralcmonuam Be ' JORM MICRbLAB 1 1 CEDAR RAPIDS - DES MOINES _ J 0-4 City of Iowa City MEMORANDUM Date: August 13, 1982 To: City Council From: Dale Helling, Assistant City Manager (3—W Re: College Street City Plaza Extension Brick work on the eastern most portion of City Plaza (College Street) in front of the new Library has been temporarily suspended. The newer brick does not match well with the older existing brick, and I do not believe this degree of contrast is acceptable. Councilmembers may wish to examine this area as the contrast is quite evident. We are attempting to locate more compatible bricks and obtain cost estimates. Time has been reserved at your August 16 informal session to discuss alternatives and current information regarding availability of materials and cost estimates. Some preliminary information from the City Engineer is included in your packet. bj4/3 1 MICROFILMED BY 1. JORM MICR46LA13- CEDAR RAPIDS DES MOINES j it ly5I J� i� City of Iowa City MEMORANDUM Date: August 13, 1982 To: Dale Helling /y From: Frank Farmer Re: Library Plaza Brick Project As you are aware, the bricks being used at the Library Plaza do not match the bricks in the existing College Street Plaza and work by Wolf Construction has been halted. These bricks were purchased a year ago by the City from Yankee Hill Brick Co. after viewing samples of bricks from both Yankee Hill Brick Co. and Sheffield Brick & Tile Co., the latter being the company from which the existing bricks were purchased. At that time, the Yankee Hill sample matched the existing Plaza bricks better than the Sheffield. sample. The bricks now being used are slightly larger than the existing bricks and mixing the bricks is not recommended. At this point the two alternatives remaining would be 1) to complete the project as started and 2) to locate bricks that match the existing Plaza bricks and re-lay what has been completed. If alternate 1 is chosen, there would be a small additional cost for downtime when the project was halted, and the project would be completed on schedule. Alternate 2 will involve purchasing new bricks and removing and replacing those bricks that have already been placed. The bricks were purchased last year at a cost of $0.32 per brick. The new bricks will cost $0.40 per brick for a total of $20,000. Wolf Construction has placed approximate 1200 sq. ft. of bricks at this time and the cost to remove and replace these bricks would be $5,600. The total additional cost for alternate 2 would be $25,600. The bricks would be purchased through Sheffield Brick and Tile Co.. Sheffield's estimate of delivery is 4 to 6 weeks. Construction can yet be completed this year if the deliveries as quoted can be made in 6 weeks. Wolf Construction has indicated its willingness to complete the project this year, even with a 4-6 week delay. tp5/5 141CRor1LMED DY -JORM MICR46LAE3 .1 CEDAR RAPIDS • DES M014ES i � I /yrla 1 r City of Iowa City MEMORANDUM Date: August 13, 1982 To: City Council'ap From: Dale Hel ling, Assistant City Manager Re: Permanent Structures on City Plaza Attached is a copy of a memorandum from Andrea Hauer regarding an application which was recently filed for approval of construction of a permanent structure on the City Plaza. This is the first such application received by the City since the Plaza ordinance was created. That ordinance does provide for the construction of seasonal and permanent freestanding structures in certain areas. As is evident from the attached memo, staff does have certain reservations regarding the appropriateness of such structures on the Plaza. At the time the original ordinance was adopted, City Plaza was a concept rather than a reality. Since that time, it has been completed and in use for several years. We have a variety of mobile vendors, selling mostly food products, and it is doubtful that this area can accommodate any more mobile vending carts. Since the opening of the Plaza, most abutting properties, including those left vacant when merchants moved to the Old Capitol Center have been occupied and the nature of abutting businesses is fairly well established. In addition, general use trends have been established and we are pretty much aware of how these vary from season to season. Furthermore, Council has recently made a decision to allow the Block 64 Hotel project construction to span the southern Dubuque Street portion of the existing plaza. Given the above considerations, it seems appropriate that Council reexamine the existing policy regarding the construction of freestanding structures and confirm the continuation of that policy before the applicant is requested to incur the considerable time and financial commitment in order to allow the City to process his application. This process includes the submitting of detailed design concepts and building plans, review of these by the Design Review Committee and possible subsequent revisions, determination of existing available utilities and arranging for possible alternatives, and certain other considerations which the City may ultimately require before a final determination on the application can be made. Your August 16, 1982, informal agenda includes a brief period of time for discussion of this issue. If you choose not to amend the current policy, staff will proceed in a manner similar to, but abbreviated from, that which has been employed in the past regarding the selection developers for urban renewal property. This will include complete review by the Design Review Committee with recommendations to Council, and ultimately Council approval of the entire project. If you wish any additional information regarding this matter before your August 16 discussion, please do not hesitate to contact me. tp5/1 cc: City Manager Don Schmeiser Andrea Hauer 141CRor ILNE0 By JORM MICRbLAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES M01NES 10/53 1 r City of Iowa City MEMORANDUM Date: August 13, 1982 To: Assistant City Manager From: W Andrea Hauer Re: Discussion of Issues Regarding Permanent Kiosks on City Plaza On August 3, 1982, we received an application to construct a permanent structure for the sale of food on City Plaza. The City Plaza Ordinance (Chapter 9.1) permits the construction of seasonal and permanent free standing structures in Zone 2 on the Plaza. Rather than detailing the specific issues and problems raised by this particular application, I believe that the larger issue of whether such structures are a desirable element for City Plaza should be considered before proceeding with this application. The locations of potential sites should be identified and the general lease terms and conditions should be agreed upon before an application for a permanent kiosk is processed. At present, lease terms and conditions have not been discussed. With' regard to locating a kiosk, the ordinance states that such are to be placed in Zone 2 (the area containing landscape planters, the sidewalk between the fire lane, the ten foot strip abutting businesses, etc.). A tour of the Zone 2 area shows the only possible space without blocking pedestrian access for construction would be in the landscape planters. It is not known whether the utility infrastructure (gas, electricity, and water) is in place at any specific location to serve a private kiosk. When City Plaza was being discussed prior to its construction, several staff members thought that permanent kiosks were to be placed in the area of landscape planters. If this is true, a kiosk would necessitate, at the minimum, alteration of a planter and at the maximum, removal of a planter. While the cost of alteration or removal of a planter (and replacement in the future if needed) are to be borne by the kiosk owner, this raises the issue of altering City Plaza. While the present design of the Plaza is not sacrosanct, such alterations should be approached with great care. Lease terms and conditions are to be determined by the City Council (59.1-10). In addition to the creation of a model lease, lease terms would have to be determined. Possible lease terms could range from a flat fee to a percentage of gross sales. Lease conditions would include all items mandated by the ordinance (insurance requirements, landscape bond or escrow account, daily maintenance, damage costs, etc.) as well as detailing procedures regarding specific problems as needed. Because of the unknown nature of what kind of problems would be created by a permenant kiosk, it is difficult to know what should be written into a lease agreement at this time. When the City Plaza ordinance was written with the provision for private free- standing kiosks, the nature and uses of City Plaza were unknown. Now, with several years of experience with City Plaza operations, it appears that mobile vendors are fairly satisfactory in fulfilling Plaza patron's needs. At this MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR4LAB j CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES. / V$3 J r a time, it would seem worthwhile to examine the ordinance's provisions for private free-standing kiosks and their necessity on City Plaza. In my opinion, this portion of the ordinance could be deleted with no negative effects. On a more philosophical basis, the City should give thought to the maintenance of the "character" of City Plaza. The City should be very aware of the impact of any permanent -type development which would 'use up' some of the Plaza's openness and green space which constitutes its "character." With the portion of City Plaza south of the Governor Lucas Fountain earmarked for the development of the hotel, the remaining sections of the Plaza may be more critical for the. retention and preservation of its "character." tp/sp i 141CRUILMED BY JORM MICR(JLAE3 CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES I � City of Iowa City MEMORANDUM Date: August 13, 1982 To: City CouncilFrom: Dale Helling, Assistant City Manager Re: Iowa -Illinois High Voltage Transmission Line Several weeks ago we were notified by Iowa -Illinois Gas & Electric Co. of their intention to construct a 161,000 volt electric transmission line in Iowa City, from the existing steel pole structure at Lafayette and Maiden Lane across private property for a short distance and then along the Rock Island Railroad right-of-way to Iowa -Illinois substation E at the Sycamore St. facility. Responses to referrals from the Public Works and Parks and Recreation Departments indicate no compelling reason for the City's opposing this construction. No City trees will be affected and Iowa -Illinois is making arrangements regarding those trees on private property which will require trimming, etc. However, a preference for underground construction for aesthetic purposes is expressed, and staff has recommended that the proposal be reviewed by the FAA and the Iowa City Airport Commission. Iowa -Illinois advises that proper notification to both agencies will be given. Iowa -Illinois has provided the following information. A total of 26 poles, some of steel and some of wood, will be used. They will range in length from 70 feet to 120 feet. Height above the ground will be a maximum of 100 feet. Attached is a copy of a letter and diagram from Iowa -Illinois regarding the design of the pole structures. The cost of undergrounding would be approximately three to four times that of overhead construction. This line is necessary to increase capacity to meet local demands. The only alternative route would be along public right-of-way and this would be a less desirable alternative. Construction will occur in late 1982 or early 1983. bc5/2 III ILROT ILIdCD BY i L CORM MICR(SLAB \ CEDAR RAPIDS DES MOIRES 1 fr 0-4 T. T. HOOGERWERF DISTRICT MANAGER RECEI'd_0 °,; J 9 +age IOWA -ILLINOIS GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY IOWA CITY, IOWA 57240 August 6, 1982 Neal Berlin, City Manager Civic Center 410 East Washington Street Iowa City, IA 52240 Re: Proposed New Electric Line Along Railroad Tracks from Substation at 1630 Lower Muscatine to Substation at Capitol and Lafayette Streets Dear Neal: Enclosed is a diagram showing the type of structure that will be used in the proposed project. While this specific diagram shows the Summit Street bridge crossing, all structures will be of similar design. Should you have further questions about this project, please don't hesitate to call. i Sincerely, � TTH:F Enclosure cc: F. B. Callahan ^OST o.nc[ Rm 1?R0 i0w. C., G., 1740 •-04[ 119.318-0er ' MICROEILMED BY -� I' ,I JORM MICROLAB -- -� fCEDAR RAPIDS R DES MOINES /115491 R Ol-- REVISION IOWA -ILLINOIS GAS AND ELECTRIC CO. MICRorILMED DY i 1 JORM MICR46LAB � - � CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES C /,V$f/ T W Z W u J a u e BRIDGE SUXMIT :7R_E7 y 4 R. *RAt• DATE TYPICAL STRUCTURE CIRCUIT 66 -BE- I SCALE- I" • I' REVISED IOWA -ILLINOIS GAS AND ELECTRIC CO. MICRorILMED DY i 1 JORM MICR46LAB � - � CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES C /,V$f/ City of Iowa City MEMORANDUM Date: August 12, 1982 To: City Council��/,� From: Assistant City Manager Re: Staffing of Resources Conservation Commission I recently proposed the following staffing alternative to the Resources Conservation Commission (RCC) and we agree that with a total allocation of a one-half time equivalent person to staff the RCC and the City's Energy Conservation Program, it is desirable to attempt to fill a single position with one person who would assume both functions. This would allow some flexibility for shifting priorities according to the immediate needs of the RCC and the City program at any given time. This is preferable to having two individuals, each working one-quarter time, to perform each of these two functions in two separate departments. In addition, it may prove more difficult to find qualified applicants who are willing to accept one-quarter time positions. I believe that the above proposal represents the most efficient utilization of this staff position if a person with some ability in both areas can be selected. This will be stated as a preference when the position is advertised. Please offer any response you may have at your informal meeting on August 16, 1982. With concurrence from Council, the position will be posted shortly after that time. Please feel free to contact me if you wish additional information prior to your August 16 meeting. bc2/6 ' 141CROFILMED OY JORM MIC RIjLA B CEDAR RAPIDS DES 1•IOI4E5 I � l 1 r ■,, j RECEIVEO AI)IG 1 21 1332 IOW& ueparc 'i'e''.: quality Stephen W. Ballou 515/281-8854 August 5, 1982 The Honorable Mary C. Neuhauser Mayor of Iowa City Civic Center 410 E. Washington St. Iowa City, IA 52240 Dear Mayor Neuhauser: Thank you for your comments regarding Iowa City's concerns for future funding under the Construction Grants program. I have transmitted your letter to Mr. Joe Obr, Director of Construction Grants, for his review. I have also scheduled a meeting with my staff specifically to address your concerns. Following review of your letter and our internal meeting, I will inform you of our position regarding Iowa City's wastewater grants program . I also wish to express my appreciation for the time you and your staff spent with me and Ann Frenzen on July 7, 1982. I hope we will have additional opportunities in the future to discuss issues of mutual concern. Sincerely, Stephen W. Ballou Executive Director SWB:plk J � I 141CROFILIIED BY t I. -JORM MICR(SLAB- _...� CEDRR RAPIDS DES MOINES � � el" r ? '1932 RE%c; � cu r1.�..0 I CEDAR RAPIDS AND IOWA CITY RAILWAY COMPANY General Wice CEDAR RAPIDS. IOWA 0. EL WOODS Vla M IDC GEYEML 9UYEEIMFf Mr. Neal G. Berlin City Manager - Iowa City 410 East Washington St. Iowa City, Iowa 52240 Dear Mr. Berlin: August 10, 1982 I recently received your letter of August 5, 1982 concerning the condition of several crossings in Iowa City. As you may or may not know, we finalized the purchase of about eight miles of Rock Island tracks from Iowa City to Hills late last fall. The condition of this track was in poor shape, including all of the crossings. We attempted to repair the track to a condition that would allow us to operate and serve the customers in Iowa City. However, a combination of poor weather, poor economic conditions and worse track conditions than previously realized, have greatly slowed our rehabilitation project. Because of these factors, most of our energies have been spent on getting the track into Hills re- built. At the same time, we realize our obligation to maintain the crossings on the old Rock Island track, which we purchased, and I feel we have cooperated to the fullest, when considering all this. On August 5, 1982, we completed the crossing work on the new Gilbert Street extension and plan to begin on the Highway #6 bypass crossing August ll, 1982. The work will hopefully be completed during the week of August 15, 1982. I also wish to bring to your attention that both of these crossings were originally put in by a contractor hired by the City, prior to the CRANDIC's operating over the Rock Island trackage, with evidently little supervision or expertise as to how to properly perform the installation. I say this because we have installed three similar rubber crossings up to three years ago, with absolutely no maintenance required during this time. Whereas, Highway #6 has required raising twice in less than two years and Gilbert St. once; but the problem is now ours. The CRANDIC Railway is highly concerned with cooperating with the City and realizes the importance of maintaining crossings properly to keep public goodwill. 1882 • A CENTURY OF SERVICE • 1982 MICMILMED BY 1 I JORM MICR46LAB i CEDAR RN'105 DES Ig014E5 I i _ a 1 r 0-4 r LI Hr. Neal G. Berlin Zowa City, Iowa August 10, 1982 Page Two. Z understand your contractor who installed the North Gilbert Street crossing will be returning this month to re -work it, and you'll receive our full cooperation. Even though Z doubt if time will permit any more extensive crossing work this fall, the CRANDIC could possibly be interested an parti- cipating in the State's Grade Crossing Rehabilitation program if funds were available. We would suggest the crossings at Capitol, Clinton and Dubuque Streets, as crossings for possible rehabilitation. We appreciate hearing from you and hopefully this crossing work will be completed to everyone's satisfaction. ORW:fp Yours truly, ,l ds 0. nods r' 1 1 141CROEILMED BY 1 "--JORM-MICR6LAB- ' CEDAR RAPIDS DES 1401MES /V57 August 5, 1982 Mr. O.R. Woods Vice -President & General Superintendent Cedar Rapids & Iowa City Railway Co. P.O. Box 351 Cedar Rapids, Iowa 52436 Dear Mr. Woods: It has been brought to my attention that the repair of several of the Crandic railroad crossings here in Iowa City has been delayed. Apparently the Department of Public Works had an understanding with the Crandic Railroad that repairs would proceed expeditiously and they have contacted your office on several occasions without success. The cooperation of Crandic Railroad in this matter would be greatly appreciated. The City Council had brought to my attention on numerous occasions the fact that several of those crossings need your attention. If there is anything that the City can do to assist you, please let me know. I would appreciate hearing when work might be completed. Sincerely yours, Neal G. Berlin City Manager I bdw/sp i 4 lyS7 r v 111CROFILMED BY jj JORM MIC REILAB i( CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES I -- I City of Iowa City MEMORANDUM Date: August 4, 1982 To: Committee on Community Needs From: Neal B4 n, City Manager Re: Human Services Funding At its Monday, August 2, informal meeting, the City Council discussed funding for human services as it relates to the CDBG program. The Council has asked me to convey to CCN its policy regarding human services funding. The City Council is committed to funding operating expenses for human services programs through resources other than CDBG. It is the Council's policy that requests for capital assistance, such as the Spouse Abuse Shelter, be considered by CCN and funded with CDBG. As this procedure i seems to work well, the Council would like to continue this process as CCN and the Council become involved in budget discussions for the 1983 entitlement program. � Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. I cc: City Council PUD bdw/sp I / f/67 ` MICROr ILMED BY ' 1 " JORM 'MICR46LA13 -� -J CEDAR RAPIDS DES MOINES l Cr LF:... 1 City of Iowa City MEMORANDUM DATE: August 12, 1982 TO: Iowa City City Council FROM: City Clerk Abbie Stolfus RE: Beer License/Conditional Approval FOR YOUR INFORMATION - Conditional approval was given at the 5/3/82 Council meeting to Harris.Discount, 71 Commercial Ct. for Sunday Sales Beer Permit. They have submitted, after the 90 -day period, the required information which allows them to retain the permit. i I 1459 141LR0(ILI-0EO BY JORM MICR6LA13 1 CEDAR RAPIDS DES MOINES I !� r I I 0-4 City of Iowa City MEMORANDUM IATII AUGUST 12, 1982 TO: CITY COUNCIL FROM. LYLE G. SEYDEL ITEM FOR DISCUSSION - INFORMAL SESSION - MONDAY, AUGUST 16, 1982 , IN RESPONSE TO THE HOUSING AUTHORITY'S INVITATION FOR PROPOSALS FOR 20 UNITS TLRNKEY HOUSING, PROJECT IA 22-4, FIVE PROPOSALS WERE RECEIVED. ATTACHED IS A LIST OF THE DEVELOPERS AND THEIR RESPECTIVE PROPOSED PRICES. EACH PROPOSAL WILL BE REVIEWED BY THE CITY STAFF AND HOUSING COMMISSION. IT IS ANTICIPATED THAT A RECOMMENDATION CONCERNING TENTATIVELY SELECTING ONE OF THE PROPOSALS WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION. FORMAL ACTION IS NOT REQUIRED AT THIS TIME. A CONSENSUS IS SUFFICIENT AND THE- RECOI-IMENDATION WILL BE FORWARDED TO HUD TOGETHER WITH C0144MTS ON EACH PROPOSAL. AFTER HUD CONCURRENCE, YOU WILL BE ASKED TO DESIGNATE BY RESOLUTION THE SELECTED DEVELOPER (2-3 WEEKS). STAFF WILL BE AVAILABLE TO DISCUSS EACH PROPOSAL AND ANSWER YOUR QUESTIONS. i i JH ATTACHMENT Mao 1 MICROf ILMED OY JORM MICROLA13- ) 1 CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES CITY OF IOWA CITY CHIC CEN(ER 410 E. WASHINGTON ST. IOWA CITY, IOWA 52240 (319)356-500C) August 10, 1982 To Whom it May Concern: In accordance with the Notice of Invitation to Builders and Developers published on July 2 and 6 and contained in the Developers Packet Project IA 22-4, the following proposals were received prior to 4:00 p.m., August 10, 1982 and opened by the undersigned starting at 4:01 p.m., August 10, 1982. Total Name Developer Price /0/6 {�c� E.� � cLyo�a/%lta�nua/ 11 OSS2, 76 /. 00 At AA: r t tucc�i� iii Au"A' (.cry /, D /S 530, oo w has >,ZRu.d..ILt., ydc-u�w �, 94t.�5- 330.00 a900 Jl ; //4, 770.77 v Housing Coordinator jh MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR#LAE3 CEDAR RAPIDS - DES MOINES i I 11160 B PROPOSAL EVALUATION SYSTEM DEVELOPER'S NAME FRANTZ CONSTRUCTION COMPANY PROPOSAL IDEI4TIFICATION -7 fovM%rcl I. SUMMARY. On the basis of the Public Housing Authority Evaluation, this proposal is: / x/ Acceptable / / Unacceptable II. EVALUATION. A. SITE. 1. The availability of utilities and of access roads to the site facilitate economical construction and operation of the project in a manner which is: /-XI Superior 6 PTS. % / Average %% Adequate Basis for rating: UTILIZED ICIA SITE 2. The site(s) meets the Public Housing Authority's Project Selection Criteria Statement of Intent (FHA Form 3166) in a manner which is: / X/ Superior 6 PTS. Average Adequate Basis for rating: UTILIZED ICHA SITE t r 141CRDEIU4ED BY ' -JORM MIC R¢LAB _l CEDAR RAPIDS • DES 1•IDIAES I I I I 1 3. :'he site(s) in terms of the physical characteristics, including size, subsurface conditions, drainage, grade and any hazard; e.g., flood, noise, pollution, etc.: / X/ Superior 6 PTS. Average Adequate Basis for rating: USED ICHA SITE PLAN 4. The accessibility of the site(s) to public transportation, shoppping, recreational and community facilities is: / X/ Superior 6 PTS. / % Average i Adequate Basis for racing: USED ICHA SITE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION QUALITY. The proposal meets the overall design and functional objectives indicated in the Developer's Packet in a manner which is: Superior 4 PTS. Average Adequate Basis for rating: COMFORMS TO REOUIREMENTS MICROFILMED BY _i -JORM-MICR#LAB' i CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES l Z, The site(s) layout in terms of density, open space, recreational mmunity space, and management and space, and if applicable, co maintenance space is: / XI 4 PTS + (1) DISCRETIONARY Superior / Average /-7 Adequate 00 GRILLS, TWO 8' PICNIC TABLES, 2 0 2 PARK Basis for rating; SAND BENCHES, 2 SING BOXES, ONE MONKEY BAR. WELL PLACED WSETS, 2 IN RELATIONSHIP TO TERRAIN ELEVATIONS. 3 The special design features relating to efficient operation, extra ecurity of the project are: durability, safety, and s / Superior 4 PTS + (1) DISCRETIONARY / Average % Adequate EXTERIOR FINISH CONTAINS NO WOOD. BRICK AND Basis for racing: STEEL.PROVIDING RELATIVE MAINTENANCE FREE EXTERIOR 4. The structure types, building(s) layout, nit(s) plans and architectural treatment are: / Superior / Average 2 PTS / Adequate WILL REQUIRE MODIFI— cing3 SDR. UNITS. SOO Basis for rating*. CONFORMS TO REOUIREPIENTS• 2 BATH ON CATION OF PLACEMENT OF A FR01PLIANCESBUILDINGIPI 1/ . ONLY PROVIDED 6 I i MICROFIL14ED BY ' I. —JORM--MICR#LA13 ___) - I CEDAR RAPIDS DES Id01YES I( 1060 1 r 4 \L -"1*) r s 5 0 The , lity of construction and materi_ s is: X Superior 4 PTS + 3 DISCRETIONARY PTS. Average Adequate Basis for rating: PROVIDING 40 GAL HVIH, WELL DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTED SERVICE BUILDING, HIGH QUALITY APPLIANCES. The proposed utility system and design features to conserve energy and otherwise serve to reduce operating costs are: X Superior 4 PTS + 1 DISCRETIONARY Average Adequate Basis for rating: 13/16 INSULATED GLASS WINDOWS, R20 RATING FOR WALLS AND R32 CEILING. THIS EXCEEDS REQUIREMENTS. C. DEVELOPER QUALIFICATIONS The capability of the Developer and Builder to expeditiously complete the proposed project in accordance with all requirements, based upon the previous experience or other evidence submitted with the proposal, and the extent to which this firm will afford minority business enterprises a practical opportunity to participate in the performance of the contract, is: X Superior 8+2 DISCRETIONARY = 10 PTS X SUPERIOR 2 PTS. — AFFIRMATIVE ACTION PLAN Average Adequate Basis for rating: FINANCIAL REPORT SL3MITTED REVEALS NO FINANCIAL PROBLEMS. SUPPORTED SY STATEMENT FROM HILLS BANK. JUST COM— PLETING A 1.4 MILLION DOLLAR HUD PROJECT. AFFIRMATIVE ACTION CONFORMS TO REQUIREMENTS. WILL COMPLETE IN 10 MONTHS. = 12 PTS. D. PRICE Value. The total price of the proposal in relation to the overall quality of the proposal is: X Superior 10 PTS. PLUS 2 DISCRETIONARY 1 I MI1111IL14ED 11 1 i"JORM MICRI�LA B'� If CEDAR RAPIDS • DES HOMES 1 7 16.756 SO. FT. AVERAGE COST PER DWELLING S0. FT. lation to the total price of all other e of this proposal is: 1IN DCLE. THIS IS THE LOWEST PROPOSAL RE- 1IGHER PROPOSAL AND $169,447 BELOW HIGHEST My 49 T 141CROFILMED BY "JORKA MICR¢LAB` - - -� CEDAR RAPIDS DES M014ES / r W'4 1 III. ASSIGNMENT OF NUMERICAL VALUES A. Distribution of Point Value 1. Superior - F1111 vnlue per the points listed 2. Average - One-half the full value per the points listed 3. Adequate - Zero points B. Each evaluation factor shall receive a value entry r C. The Public Housing Authority may award discretionary points, to a maximum of 20 additional points, within and to individual evaluation factors, which in its opinion, are considered to be outstanding. EVALUATION FACTORS PUINTS AVERAGE A. SITE (24)+( 4)=(2b) 1. Utilities and Access Roads ( 6) 2. Project Selection Criteria ( 6)+(4)=(10) 3. Physical Characteristics ( 6) 4. i I Accessibility ( 6) S B. DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION QUALITY (24)+(10)=(34) �. 1. Overall Objectives ( 4) 2. Site Layout ( 4)+( 1)=( 5) 3. Special Design Features ( 4)+( 2)=( 6) 4. Architectural Treatment ( 4)+( 1)=( 5) 5. Quality - Construction 6 Materials ( 4)+( 4)=� 8) 6. Utilities and Energy ( 4)+( 2)=( 6) C. DEVELOPER QUALIFICATIONS (10)+( 4)=(14) I. Capability to Complete ( 8)+( 2)=(10) 2. Affirmative Action Plan ( 2)+( 2)=( 4) D. PRICE (20)+( 2)=(22) 1. Value (10)+( 2)=(12) 2. Competitive Price (10) TOTAL POINTS DISCRETIONARY POINTS OVERALL TOTAL SUPERIOR I AVERAGE ADEQUATE 6 6 i d 6 6 24 4 4 + (1) 4 + (1) 2 4 + (3) 4 + (1) 20 + (6) 2 8 + (2) I 2 10 10 + + (2) (2) 10 20 + (2) 74 2 10 86 1 141CROf IL14ED BY "JORM MICR#LAS' 7 CEDAR RAPIDS DES MOINES ! I /%60 i I Public Housing Authority discretionary points are indicated as the second parenthetical value set forth to the right of certain i evaluation factors. These additional points may be awarded to certain outstanding factors contained in a proposal irrespective of rating assigned to any or all other factors. 1 i i I i /.. + MICROFILMED BY J I'\L., ) �-JORM -MIC RbLA9* `j CEDAR RAPIDS •DES MOINES LL - ' --v PROPOSAL EVALUATION SYSTEM DEVELOPER'S NAME HORIZONS UNLIMITED PROPOSAL IDE14TIFICATION I. SUMMARY. On the basis of the Public Housing Authority Evaluation, this proposal is: / X/ Acceptable Unacceptable II. EVALUATION. y A. SITE. 1. The availability of utilities and of access roads to the site facilitate economical construction and operation of the project in a manner which is: /77 Superior 6 PTS. f-1 Average Adequate Basis for rating: UTILIZED ICHA SITE 2. The site(s) meets the Public Housing Authority's Project Selection Criteria Statement of Intent (FNA Form 3166) in a manner which is: / X/ Superior 6 PTS. L/ Average / / Adequate Basis for rating: UTILIZED ICHA SITE. 0 I4ICROIILMED BY DORM MIC RIJLA13 - --� CEDAR RAPIDS DES MOINES I IJ 3. :'he site(s) in terms of the physical characteristics, including size, subsurface conditions, drainage, grade and any hazard; e.g., flood, noise, pollution, etc.: / X/ Superior 6 PTS. Average Adequate Basis for rating: USED ICHA SITE PLAN 4. The accessibility of the site(s) to public transportation, shoppping, recreational and community facilities is: / X/ Superior 6 PTS. Average Adequate Basis for rating; USED ICHA SITE B. DESIGNAND CONSTRUCTION QUALITY. The proposal meets the overall design and functional objectives indicated in the Developer's Packet in a manner which is: Superior 4 PTS. Average Adequate Basis for rating: CONFORM TO REQUIREMENTS 1 :41CROPILI4ED BY _J JORM MIC RbLA B' CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOIRES J� r 2. The site(s) layout in terms of density, open space, recreational space, and if applicable, community space, and management and maintenance space is: / X/ Superior 4 PTS + (1) DISCRETIONARY Average Adequate Basis for rating; MODIFIED SIDEWALK PLAN WHICH WILL PROVIDE FOR MORE PRIVACY THAN ON ICHA SITE PLAN. WILL REQUIRE MODIFICATION OF SIDEWALK FROM PARKING AREA TO SCOTT BLVD AS A 4 FT WALK WILL BE REQUIRED. EXCELLENT TREATMENT OF THE PLAYGROUND AND RECREATION AREA. 3. The special design features relating to efficient operation, extra durability, safety, and security of the project are: /x Superior 4 PTS. + (1) DISCRETIONARY Average / / Adequate Basis for rating: BRICK E STEEL EXTERIOR i 4. The structure types, building(s) layout, unit(s) plans and architectural treatment are: /n ' Superior 4 PTS. Average ! / / Adequate Basis, for rating:_ CONFORMS TO REQUIREMENTS. WILL REQUIRE MODIFICATION IN 3 SDR. FLOOR PLAN. HWH AND FURNACE CANNOT BE UNDER STAIRWAY AND THE GAS APPLIANCE CANNOT BE IN THE 1/2 BATH. BY MODIFYING SIDEWALK PLAN, IMPROVED TRAFFIC PATTERN WITHIN UNIT. NO DISCRETIONARY PTS. AWARDED DUE TO REQUIRED CHANGES. r Mz MICROFILMED BY L JORM -MICRdLAB-%\~I CEDAR RAP IDS DES PONES I / I �JJ i„ r•• S. The quality of construction and materials is: X Superior 4 PTS. + (4) DISCRETIONARY = 8 PTS. Average Adequate Basis for rating: PROVIDING 40 GAL HWH. WELL DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTED MAINTENANCE BLDG. CHANGING WALK PLAN IMPROVES TRAFFIC PATTERN. EXTERIOR APPEARANCE EXCELLENT. 6. The proposed utility system and design features to conserve energy and otherwise serve to reduce operating costs are: X Superior 4 PTS. + (2) DISCRETIONARY Average Adequate Basis for rating: SLIDING BRONZE ALUMINUM WITH FACTORY TRIPLE -GLAZE.. R.21 WALL RATING AND R38 CEILING RATING. C. DEVELOPER QUALIFICATIONS The capability of the Developer and Builder to expeditiously complete the proposed project in accordance with all requirements, based upon the previous experience or other evidence submitted with the proposal, and the extent to which this firm will afford minority business enterprises a practical opportunity to participate in the performance of the contract, is: X Superior 8 PTS. + (2) DISCRETIONARY X SUPERIOR 2 PTS. + (2) DISCRETIONARY - AFFIRMATIVE ACTION PLAN Average Adequate Basis for rating: FINANCIAL STATEMENTS SUBMITTED INDICATE ONLY s1,0O0 ASSETS FOR HORIZONS UNLIMITED, A NEWLY FORMED ORGANIZATION. THEY DO INDICATE THE COMBINED PERSONAL NET WORTH OF OVER $4,000,000; HOWEVER, DO NOT RELATE THIS TO THE PARTNERSHIP. STATEMENT FROM IOWA - D. PRICE DES MOINES NATIONAL SHOULD REMOVE ANY DOUBT AS TO ABILITY TO FINANCE. PROVEN TURNKEY RECORD.* Value. The total price of the proposal in relation to the overall quality of the proposal is: X Superior 10 PTS. 1 *AFFIRMATIVE ACTION PLAN DESERVES THE DISCRETIONARY POINTS. 14 PTS. 1 _ MILROII LId[D BY I -CORM MIC R4tiLAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES o-1DI:lES i f I I LL i 1 /—% Average /-7 Adequate Basis for rating? PROVIDING 16,736 S0. FT. AVERAGE CAST PER DWELLING t UNIT $30,230. $36.13 PER S0. FT. l 2. Competitive Price. In relation to the total price of all other proposals, the total price of this proposal is: !1 superior /-7 Average .. 1 / XX Adequate 0 Basis for rating: IS BARELY WITHIN OCEE. THIS IS THE HIGHEST PROPOSAL; ' $169,447 ABOVE THE LOWEST PROPOSAL AND $42,306 ABOFE THE NEXT LOWER PROPOSAL. 1 i t i /y6 0 1 MICROIILMED BY "JORM-MICRdLAB' ._.� CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES �� III. ASSIGNMENT OF NUMERICAL VALUES A. Distribution of Paint Value 1. Superior - bull vnlue per the points Listed 2. Average - One-half the full value per the points listed 3. Adequate - Zero points B. Each evaluation factor shall receive a value entry fi C. The Public Housing Authority may award discretionary points, to a maximum of 'LO additional points, within and to individual evaluation factors, which in its opinion, are considered to be outstanding. EVALUATION FACTORS POINTS A. SITE (24)+( 4)=(7.b) 1. Utilities and Access Roads ( 6) 2. Project Selection Criteria ( 6)+(4)=(10) 3. Physical Characteristics ( 6) 4. Accessibility ( 6) B. DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION QUALITY (24)+(10)(34 1. Overall Objectives ( 4) 6 2. Site Layout ( 4)+( 1)-( 5) 3. Special Design Features ( 4)+( 2)-( 6) 4. Architectural Treatment ( 4)+( 1)-( 5) 5. Quality - Construction 6 4 + (1) 4 Materials ( 4)+( 4)=( 8) 6. Utilities aYd Energy ( 4)+( 2)=( 6) C. DEVELOPER QUALIFICATIONS (]0)+( 4)=(14) 1. Capability to Complete ( 8)+( 2)=(10) 2. Affirmative Action Plan ( 2)+( 2)-( 4) D. PRICE (20)+( 2)-(22) 1. Value (10)+( 2)-(12) 2. Competitive Price (10) TOTAL POINTS DISCRETIONARY POINTS OVERALL TOTAL SUPERIOR AVERAGE ADEQUATE I 6 6 6 6 24 4 4 + (1) 4 + (1) 4 4 + (4) 4 + (2) 24 + (8) 8 + (2) 10 + (4) 10 10 68 12 80 1 I 111CROr ILMED BY JORM MICR6LAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES i I _ i i 7 j MICROFILMED BY -DORM MICRbCAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOIYES I indicated of certain ,arded to espective PROPOSAL EVALUATION SYSTEM ns FWT NAME MOORE CONSTRUCTION _ PROPOSAL IDE14TIFICATION I. SUMMARY. On the basis of the Public Housing Authority Evaluation, this proposal is: / X/ Acceptable / % Unacceptable II. EVALUATION. A. SITE. 1. The availability of utilities and of access roads to the site facilitate economical construction and operation of the project in a manner which is: / X/ Superior 6 PTS. Average Adequate Basis for rating: USED ICHA SITE 2. The site(s) meets the Public Housing Authority's Project Selection Criteria Statement of Intent (FHA Form 3166) in a manner which is: / X / Superior 6 PTS. L/ Average Adequate Basis for rating: UTILIZED ICHA SITE 0 1' MICROr ILMED BY -DORM MIC R(JLA9- CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOIRES ' i /1/60 I � I 1 3. The site(s) in terms of the physical characteristics, including size, subsurface conditions, drainage, grade and any hazard; e.g., flood, noise, pollution, etc.: j / X/ Superior 6 PTS. u Average Adequate Basis for rating: UTILIZED ICHA SITE PLAN I 4. The accessibility of the site(s) to public transportation, shoppping, recreational and community facilities is: / X/ superior Average Adequate Basis for rating: USED ICHA SITE B. DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTIONQUALITY. The proposal meets the overall design and functional objectives indicated in the Developer's Packet in a manner which is: /x/ Superior 4 PTS i Average I Adequate Basis for rating: CONFORM TO REQUIREMENTS f 1 i I MICROFIL14ED BY `- `JORM-MICRbLA9 I CEDAR RAPIDS DES MOINES I i 2. The site(s) layout in terms of density, open space, recreational i J space, and if applicable, community space, and management and maintenance space is: —x/ Superior 4 PTS. / / Average /-7 Adequate Basis for rating; USED ICHA SITE PLAN WITH NO KNOWN CHANGES. MINIMAL PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT PROVIDED. 3. The special design features relating to efficient operation, extra durability, safety, and security of the project are: Superior 4 PTS. /—j Average i I . Adequate Basis for rating: CONFORMS TO BASIC REQUIREMENTS. BRICK L MASONITE r COLORLOCK HARDBOARD WITH 15 YEAR WARRANTY. 4. The structure types, building(s) layout, unit(s) plana and architectural treatment are: I Superior ! Average 2 PTS. Adequate Basis for rating: CONFORMS TO REQUIREMENTS. WILL REQUIRE SOME MODIFICATION OF PLACEMENT OF APPLIANCES IN 1/2 BATH IN 3 BDR. . UNIT. SOD ONLY PROVIDED 6' OUT FROM BUILDING G SIDEWALKS. 1' L 141CROFIL14ED BY r . _JORM MICR46LA13- CEDAR RAPIDS DESMONES .� ILL r �..a_ r F C. 5. The quality of construction and materials is: X Superior 4 PTS + (1) DISCRETIONARY Average Adequate Basis for rating: PROVIDING 40 GAL. HWH, WELL DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTED SERVICE BUILDING, HIGH QUALITY VINYL, CARPET AND APPLIANCES. 6. The proposed utility system and design features to conserve energy and otherwise serve to reduce operating costs are: X Superior 4 PTS. + (2) DISCRETIONARY Average Adequate Basis for rating: 5/8" INSULATED SANDWICH PANELS (ALUMINUM SLIDERS WITH THERMAL BREAK) R21 RATING WALLS, R38 RATING CEILING, EXCEEDS REQUIREMENTS, PROVIDING PILOTLESS RANGE E HEATER. DEVELOPER QUALIFICATIONS The capability of the Developer and Builder to expeditiously complete the proposed project in accordance with all requirements, based upon the previous experience or other evidence submitted with the proposal, and the extent to which this firm will afford minority business enterprises a practical opportunity to participate in the performance of the contract, is: X Superior 8 PTS. X SUPERIOR 2 PTS. — AFFIRMATIVE ACTION PLAN Average Adequate Basis for rating: FINANCIAL REPORT SUBMITTED REVEALS NO •PROBLEMS. AFFIRMATIVE ACTION PLAN CONFORMS. 12 MONTHS FOR COMPLETION. 10 PTS. D. PRICE Value. the total price of the proposal in relation to the overall quality of the proposal is: X Superior 10 PTS. 1 MICROFILMED BY JORM MIC RbLAB CEDAR NAPIDS DES IAOIYES � I /::7 Average /—% Adequate Basis for rating: PROVIDING 16,736 S0. FT. AVERAGE COST PER DWELLING UNIT IS $30,2323 36.13 PER S0. FT. 10 PTS. 2. Competitive Price, In relation to the total price of all other proposals, the total price of this proposal is: =x Superior SO PTS. Average /% Adequate Basis for rating: IS WITHIN DC&E COSTS. SECOND LOWEST PROPOSAL. $70,200 ABOVE LOW PROPOSAL. $37,231 BELOW NEXT HIGHER PROPOSAL AND $99,247 BELOW HIGHEST PROPOSAL. Mee MICROFILM BY JORM MICR#LA13 CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOI YES I r r. III. ASSIGNMENT OF NUMERICAL VALUES A. Distribution of Point Value 1. Superior - Full vnluc pur the pointn listed 2. Average - One-half the full value per the points listed 3. Adequate - Zero points B. Each evaluation factor shall receive a value entry r C. The Public Housing Authority may award discretionary points, to a maximum of 20 additional points, within and to individual evaluation factors, which in its opinion, are considered to be outstanding. EVALUATION FACTORS POINTS A. SITE (24)+( 4)=(2b) 1. Utilities and Access Roads ( 6) 2. Project Selection Criteria ( 6)+(4)=(10) 3. Physical Characteristics ( 6) 4. Accessibility ( 6) i I U. DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION QUALITY (24)+(10)(34) 1. Overall Objectives ( 4) 2. Site Layout ( 4)+( 1)-( 5) 3. Special Design Features ( 4)+( 2)-( 6) 4. Architectural Treatment ( 4)+( 1)=( 5) 5. Quality - Construction b Materials ( 4)+( 4)-C 8) 6. Utilities and Energy ( 4)+( 2)-( 6) C. DEVELOPER QUALIFICATIONS O0)+( 4)=(14) I. Capability to Complete ( 8)I-( 2)-(10) 2. Affirmative Action Plan (-21+( 2)-( 4) D. PRICE (20)+( 2)-(22) 1. Value (10)+( 2)-(12) 2. Competitive Price (10) TOTAL POINTS DISCRETIONARY POINTS SUPERIOR AVERAGE ADEQUATE I 6 6 6 24 4 4 2 4 + (1) 4 + (2) 20 + ( 3 ) a 2 10 10 10 20 74 2 3 1 OVERALL TOTAL 99 1' MILROEI LIdED RY I "CORM -MIC R#LAB CEDAR RAPIDS DES MOINES � � # Public Housing Authority discretionary points are indicated as the second parenthetical value set forth to the right of certain evaluation factors. These additional points may be awarded to certain outstanding factors contained in a proposal irrespective of rating assigned to any or all other factors. 141CROFILMED BY ... JORM MIC R6IAH" CEDAR RAPIDS DES MOINES I� i ./ _ A ,•_aril_ _ PROPOSAL EVALUATION SYSTEM DEVELOPER'S NAME SOUTHGATE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY PROPOSAL IDE14TIFICATION ' I. SUMMARY. On the basis of the Public Housing Authority Evaluation, this proposal is: X/ Acceptable Unacceptable (' II. EVALUATION. �) A. SITE. 1. The availability of utilities and of access roads to the site facilitate economical construction and operation of the project in a manner which is: i /-x/ Superior 6 PTS. I 1 t / / Average % Adequate Basis for rating: UTILIZED ICHA SITE i ' 1 i 2. The site(s) meets the Public Housing Authority's Project Selection Criteria Statement of Intent (FHA Form 3166) in a manner which is: / Superior 6 PTS. I L/ Average I Adequate Basis for rating: UTILIZED ICHA SITE' • �yso l J t41CA0C ILNCD BY i -"-CORM MIC R#LAB i CEDAR RAPIDS DES Id01AE5 i � 3. :'he site(s) in terms of the physical characteristics, including size, subsurface conditions, drainage, grade and any hazard; e.g., flood, noise, pollution, etc.: LX / Superior 6 PTS. Average Adequate Basis for rating: UTILIZED ICHA SITE PLAN 4. The accessibility of the site(s) to public transportation, shoppping, recreational and community facilities is: / x::/- Superior 6 PTS. / / Average Adequate Basis for rating: UTILIZED ICiA SITE B. DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION QUALITY. The proposal meets the overall design and functional objectives indicated in the Developer's Packet.in a manner which is: I Superior / X // Average 2 PTS. Adequate t Basis for rating: CONFORMS TO REQUIREMENTS EXCEPT SERVICE BUILDING WHICH SHOWS NO DIVISIONS FOR OFFICE G BATHROOM L NO SERVICE DOOR. NO HEATING. ! MICROIILMED B1' DORM - MICR6LAE3 CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES I I R 2. The site(s) layout in terms of density, open space, recreational space, and if applicable, community space, and management and maintenance space is: /x / Superior 4 PTS. / % Average Adequate Basis for rating; MEETS REQUIREMENTS. USED ICHA SITE PLAN. NO SPECIFICS PROVIDED FOR PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT. 3. The special design features relating to efficient operation, extra durability, safety, and security of the project are: =X Superior 4 PTS. Average Adequate i Basis for rating: CONFORMS TO REQUIREMENTS 4. The structure types, building(s) layout, unit(s) plans and architectural treatment are: / X / Superior 4 PTS. Average Adequate Basis for rating: CONFORMS TO REQUIREMENTS Mxe MICROFILMED BY I -JORM MICRIJLAB'- CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES I 5. The quality of construction and materials is: X Superior 4 PTS. Average Adequate Basis for rating: 30 GAL. HWH: ONLY FURNACE TYPE SPECIFIED. OTHER APPLIANCES NOT SPELLED OUT; HOWEVER, EXPERIENCE WITH DEVELOPERS INDICATE COMPLETE SATISFACTION ON QUALITY AND MATERIALS. 6. The proposed utility system and design features to conserve energy and otherwise serve to reduce operating costs are: X Superior 4 PTS. Average Adequate Basis for rating: MEETS R19 WALL AND 30 CEILING REQUIREMENTS. BRONZE ALUMINUM SLIDERS, TRIPLE—GLAZED WINDOWS. C. DEVELOPER QUALIFICATIONS The capability of the Developer and Builder to expeditiously complete the proposed project in accordance with all requirements, based upon the previous experience or other evidence submitted with the proposal, and the extent to which this firm will afford minority business enterprises a practical opportunity to participate in the performance of the contract, is: X Superior 8 + 2 DISCRETIONARY PTS. = 10 PTS. X SUPERIOR 2 PTS. — AFFIRMATIVE ACTION PLAN i Average Adequate Basis for rating: A PROVEN TRACK RECORD. RECENTLY COMPLETED 32 UNIT TURNKEY PROJECT WITH ICHA WHICH FROM START TO FINISH WAS A PLEASURE 1 TO BE ASSOCIATED WITH. D. PRICE Value. The total price of the proposal in relation to the overall quality of the proposal is: X Superior 10 PTS. I I cnr ILMED BY I -JORM MIC RI�LAB-- � �� 1 CEDAR RAPIDS DES MOIYES J I 1 It 1 I Average /% Adequate Basis for rating: PROVIDING 16,800 SO. FT. AVERAGE COST PER DWELLING UNIT IS $30,157. '$35.90 PER SO. FT. DEVELOPERS STATEMENT IN RPOPOSAL CONCERNING INSTALLATION OF SANITARY SEWER FROM MANHOLE #1 THROUGH n3 IS NOT CORRECT; THEREFORE, HIS PRICE MAY BE INCORRECT. 2. Competitive Price, In relation to the total price of all other proposals, the total price of this proposal is: J Superior /x Average 5 PTS. /_% Adequate Basis for rating: IS WITHIN DC&E. 5127,141 ABOVE LOWEST PROPOSAL. $19,710 ABOVE NEXT LOWER PROPOSAL AND $42,306 BELOW HIGHEST PROPOSAL. 0 �y6o 1 i MlDaonurED Dr -DORM MIC Rftii LAB CEDAR RAPIDS DES MOINES 1 J r , III. ASSIGNMENT OF NUMERICAL VALUES A. Distribution of Point Value , 1. Superior - Full vnluc per the points listed 2. Average - One-half the full value per the points listed 3. Adequate - Zero points B. Each evaluation factor shall receive a value entry t C. The Public Housing Authority may award discretionary points, to a maximum of 20 additional points, within and to individual evaluation factors, which in its opinion, are considered to be outstanding. tics ( 6) EVALUATION FACTORS POINTS A. SITE (24)+( 4)=(2b) 1. Utilities and Access Roads ( 6) 2. Project Selection Criteria ( 6)+(4)=(10) 3. is 1 Ch t Physica arac er i I 6 6 •4. Accessibility ( 6) B. DESIC14 AND CONSTRUCTION QUALITY (24)+(10)(34) 1. Overall Objectives ( 4) 2. Site Layout ( 4)+( 1)-( 5) 3. Special Design Features ( 4)+( 2)-( 6) 4. i Architectural Treatment ( 4)+( 1)-( 5) 5. Quality - Construction 6 4 Materials ( 4)+( 4)-� 8) 6. Utilities and Energy ( 4)+( 2)-( 6) C. DEVELOPER QUALIFICATIONS (10)+( 4)=(14) 1. Capability to Complete ( 8)4-( Z)=(10) 2 Affirmative Action Plan ( +( 2)-( 4) 2) D. PRICE (20)+( 2)=(22) 1. Value (10)+( 2)=(12) 2. Competitive Price (10) 66 TOTAL POINTS DISCRETIONARY POINTS SUPERIOR AVERAGE ADEQUATE i I 6 6 6 6 24 2 4 4 _4 20 2 I 1 2 12 10 5 10 66 9 I 75 OVERALL TOTAL M'0o t 141CROEILMED BY JORM MICR#LAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES ! I I J - I LL n Public Housing Authority discretionary points are indicated as the second parenthetical value set forth to the right of certain evaluation factors. These additional points may be awarded to certain outstanding factors contained in a proposal irrespective of rating assigned to any or all other factors.. 1 141CROFILMCD BY 1 " DORM MICR¢LAS CEDAR RAPIDS DES I401YES I i PROPOSAL EVALUATION SYSTEM nnrcTnvFA'C NAMF P L PARTNERSHIP PROPOSAL IDE14TIFICATION I. SUMMARY. On the basis of the Public Housing Authority Evaluation, this proposal is: / —X7 Acceptable / % Unacceptable II. EVALUATION. A. SITE. 1. The availability of utilities and of access roads to the site facilitate economical construction and operation of the project in a manner which is: x-/ Superior 6 PTS. t r i j % / Average Adequate Basis for rating: UTILIZED ICHA SITE 2. The site(s) meets the Public Housing Authority's Project Selection Criteria Statement of Intent (FHA Form 3166) in a manner which is: // Superior 6 PTS. L/ Average Adequate Basis for rating: USED ICHA SITE 0 '141CROF1L4ED Y JORM MICR AB 401NLEDAR RANI05 1 J , ,rte f� A 3. The site(s) in terms of the physical characteristics, including size, subsurface conditions, drainage, grade and any hazard; e.g., flood, noise, pollution, etc.: LX Superior 6 PTS. Average Adequate Basis for racing: USED ICHA SITE PLAN 4. The accessibility of the site(s) to public transportation, shoppping, recreational and community facilities is: / X/ Superior 6 PTS. % / Average /—/ Adequate Basis for rating: USED ICHA SITE B. DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION QUALITY. j The proposal meets the overall design and functional objectives indicated in the Developer's Packet in a manner which is: Superior Average / X/ Adequate 0 Basis for rating: WHILE THE SITE PLAN CONTAINS THE REQUIRED SERVICE/. MAINTENANCE BUILDING, THERE WERE NO SUPPORTING FLOOR PLANS/ELEVATIONS, NOR DETAILS PROVIDED ON THE 5087 WHICH WOULD LEAD ONE TO BELIEVE THIS STRUCTURE WAS INCLUDED IN THIS PROPOSAL. )r M1IICROEIL14ED BY � --"JORM-MICR6LAB _ l CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES I I � I _V 1 " 2. The site(s) layout in terms of density, open space, recreational J space, and if applicable, community space, and management and maintenance space is: Superior =1 Average 2 PTS. Adequate Basis for rating; 1 SWING SET, 1 SAND BOX, 2 SPRING ANIMALS, GARDEN PLOTS, CONCRETE PLAY SLAB WERE PROVIDED (ITEM 2 5087). THE GARDEN 1 PLOTS SHOULD BE A SAVINGS IN SOD AND ARE POORLY PLACED AS IS THE CON- CRETE PLAY AREA. TERRAIN ELEVATIONS WERE NOT CONSIDERED IN LOCATING THESE FEATURES. 3. The special design features relating to efficient operation, extra j / durability, safety, and security of the project are: ..7 Superior 4 PTS. Average i J% Adequate I !� 7 Basis for rating: NO SPECIAL TREATMENT. ALL PROPOSALS RATED EQUAL ON THIS ITEM, 4. The structure t es building(s) fl YP g(s) layout, unit (s) plans and architectural treatment are: ` i i Superior i / X / Average 2 PTs. Adequate Basis for rating: ROOM, WINDOW, DOOR DIMENSIONS NOT SHOWN. I WINDOWS NOT SHOWN ON UNIT PLANS. i I /9'60 �. MICRO FIL14ED BY -J JORM-MICRbLAE3 F..\. CEDAR RAPIDS •DES MDIYES I� E: r W4 5. The quality of construction and materials is: X Superior 4 PTS Average Adequate Basis for rating: CONSTRUCTION G MATERIALS MEET REQUIREMENTS. ALL PROPOSALS RANKED THE SAME. 6. The proposed utility system and design features to conserve energy and otherwise serve to reduce operating costs are: X Superior 4 PTS. Average Adequate Basis for rating: MEETS REQUIREMENTS C. DEVELOPER QUALIFICATIONS The capability of the Developer and Builder to expeditiously complete the proposed project in accordance with all requirements, based upon the previous experience or other evidence submitted with the proposal, and the extent to which this firm will afford minority business enterprises a practical opportunity to participate in the performance of the contract, is: X Superior - AFFIRMATIVE ACTION PLAN = 2 + (1) = 3 X Average 4 ANNUAL AUDITED FINANCIAL REPORT NOT PROVIDED. Adequate ACCOUNTANTS REPORT ON THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS PROVIDED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WOULD BE RE - Basis for rating: QUIRED FROM THIS FIRM. STATEMENT CONCERNING DELAYED STARTING DATE. A SUPERIOR RATING AND A BONUS POINT AWARDED BASED ON AFFIRMATIVE ACTION PLAN. TOTAL 7 POINTS: D. PRICE Value. The total price of the proposal in relation to the overall quality of the proposal is: Superior 141CROEILMED BY i I 1 JORM MICR46LA13 1 CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES ' I 1 /x Average S PTS. Adequate Basis for rating: PROVIDING 16,712 SO. FT. AVERAGE COST PER DWELLING UNIT $29,650. 535.48 SO. FT. 2. Competitive Price. In relation to the total price of all other proposals, the total price of this proposal is: Superior /x Average 5 PTS. /% Adequate Basis for rating: NO INDICATION THAT TOTAL DEVELOPMENT COST INCLUDES SERVICE BUILDING. IS WITHIN DCEE. $107,431 ABOVE LOWEST PROPOSAL. $37,231 ABOVE NEXT LOWER PROPOSAL. $19,710 BELOW NEXT HIGHER PRO- POSAL AND $62,016 BELOW HIGHEST PROPOSAL. t j MICROf ILMCO BY "JORM MICR#L AB - Z CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES I - r �- - ti r 0'♦ LL III. ASSIGNMENT OF NUMERICAL VALUES A. Distribution of Point Value 1. Superior - Full value per thu points listed 2. Average - Onc-half the full value per the points listed 3. Adequate - Zero points E. Each evaluation factor shall receive a value entry C. The Public Housing Authority may award discretionary points, to a maximum of 20 additional points, within and to individual evaluation factors, which in its opinion, are considered to be outstanding. EVALUATION FACTORS POINTS A. SITE (24)+( 4)=(2b; 1. Utilities and Access Roads ( 6) 2. Project Selection Criteria ( 6)+(4)=(10) 3. Physical Characteristics ( 6) 4. Accessibility ( 6) i B. DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION QUALITY (24)+(10)(34; 1. Overall Objectives ( 4) j 2. Site Layout ( 4)+( 1)-( 5) 3. Special Design Features ( 4)+( 2)-( 6) 4. Architectural Treatment ( 4)+( 1)-( 5) 5. Quality - Construction b Materials ( 4)+( 4)=t U) 6. Utilities and Energy ( 4)+( 2)-( 6) C. DEVELOPER QUALIFICATIONS (]0)+( 4)=(14) 1. Capability to Complete ( 8)f( Z)=(10) 2. Affirmative Action Plan ( 2)+( 2)-( 4) D. PRICE (20)+( 2)=(22) 1. Value (10)+( 2)=(12) 2. Competitive Price (10) TOTAL POINTS DISCRETIONARY POINTS SUPE•RIOR AVERAGE ADEQUATE - 6 i I 6 6 6 24 0 2 4 2 4 4 12 t 4 II 4 2 + (1)=3 5 5 1 38 18 N 57 OVERALL TOTAL /ys o l I 111CROr WIED BY -CORM MIC RbLAEi CEDAR RAPIDS DES'MOINES 1 Public Housing Authority discretionary points are indicated as the second parenthetical value set forth to the right of certain evaluation factors. These additional points may be awarded to certain outstanding factors contained in a proposal irrespective of rating assigned to any or all other factors. iMICROFILMED BY I I I_ --JORM MICRbLAB- CEDAR RAPIDS DES MOINES II r City Council August 12, 1982 Page 2 2. A multiple use building housing offices, specialty shops and a bar or restaurant. Most of the prospects interviewed by GWG have been persons now living and working in Iowa City. Approximately 508 of these persons now have business locations in Iowa City, while the balance now work out of their homes or are contemplating a new business venture. 3. Working with Johnson County for public offices. B. BUDGET REQUIREMENTS FOR OLD LIBRARY BUILDING.* (including GWG Exhibits #1, #2, and #3) 1. Land Acquisition. GWG Investments has submitted a bid to the City of Iowa City for $165,000.00 for the purchase of the building. The parking was bid under a lease provision. This lease provision will be offered to each tenant for their acceptance. 2. Exterior Construction. The West and North qrade elevations around the outside of the building will be lowered ap- proximately one foot. Foundation walls now covered with earth on these two sides will be waterproofed if excavation reveals that this will cure the moisture problems now existing in Suites A, B, and C. (See Exhibit #1) The steps into the library will be reconstructed if advisable. The GWG consultant will make this determination. However, GWG favors the recon- struction. Pictures and plans have been secured to show the original construction. (See Exhibit #3) The present bushes are now too large and over- grown to be salvaged. The majority of bushes and trees will be removed and replaced with new growth. One existing chestnut tree at the north- west corner of the building will be salvaged and replanted if possible. No bushes will remain in the planter outside of Suite D. * Based on offices, specialty shops and a possible restaurant usage. MICROFILMED BY � DORM MIC RISLAB 1 CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES I � I 1 0-4 BARKER, CRUISE & KENNEDY LAWYERS CHARLES A BARKER ]II IOWA AVENUE • P.O. B02 2000 JOHN D. CRUISE IOWA CITY, IOWA AREA CODE ]ID MICHAEL W. KENNEDY 52244 TELEPHONE ]SI•SISI JAMES O. HOUGHTON DAVIS L_ FOSTER August 12, 1982 F�d�D AUG 121982 City council ABBIE STOLFUS City of Iowa City Civic Center CITY CLERK 410 East Washington Iowa City, IA 52240 Re: GWG Investments - Bid on Old Public Library - Additional Information Gentlepersons: i GWG Investments has been asked by the City Staff to clarify several points of its bid on the Old Public Library. This letter will attempt to give the necessary data re- quested and will include information concerning the following: A. INTENDED USAGE OF THE LIBRARY SPACE. B. BUDGET REQUIREMENTS FOR OLD LIBRARY BUILDING. C. BUDGET. A. INTENDED USAGE OF THE LIBRARY SPACE. The intended use for the Old Library Building is now three -fold: 1. A single tenant supper club, bar and restaurant. GWG has been approached by a local architectural firm representing a client now owning and op- erating a supper club in the Chicago area. This client was shown through the library building and wishes to continue negotiations early in September. The client estimated his cost of remodeling to be approximately $1,200,000.00. /Ao/ 1 IIICROFILMED BY I l JORM MICRbLA9 _ J ,�'j I CEDAR RAPIDS • DES M019ES I r City Council August 12, 1982 Page 3 Two new entrances will be constructed on the West side of the building just north and south of the steps. These new entrances will serve Suites A and C. Another new entrance may be constructed on College Street to serve Suite D. The roof needs attention immediately and repairs will be made. Dome: Exploration into a source of solar heat through the dome will be undertaken. If this is not feasible a new opaque window or art work will be installed. East Side: Trees will be trimmed and plantings pruned. 3. Interior Construction. The windows in the 1903 building need replacement. They will be replaced with double or triple pane energy efficient windows. All common areas, halls and stairwells, will be refurbished, repainted and tile work repaired. Stairwells will need work. Miscellaneous work such as removing the book elevators, shelving and replacing the broken window panes will be undertaken. Each suite will be subject to the tenants' requests for painting and for plumbing and electrical work. GWG will hope that each tenant will try to do as much work as possible under a lease. Their costs are set apart in another section. 4. Mechanical/Electrical. The mechanical and electrical systems will be up- graded to support the intended uses and to meet City Code. A fire protection system will be needed and a new water service will be brought into the building. MICRO(ILMED BY JORM 'MIC RbLA B� CEDAR RAPIDS DES MOINES f 7 City Council August 12, 1982 Page 4 Approximately $50,000.00 has been budgeted for work on the boiler, radiation and the air con- ditioning systems. The two five ton Frigidaire units will have to be replaced. Work will be done on the thirty ton Trane unit in the base- ment. Restrooms in Suite B will be relocated. All other restrooms will be upgraded and remodeled. Complete rewiring will be required in the 1903 building and upgradinq on the 1963 building. The goal will be to have all the rental units separately metered. 5. Tenant Improvements. Each tenant shall have his own requirements for plumbing, heating, air conditioning, wiring, painting, etc. Gt4G will endeavor to work with each tenant to maximize the area to be rented and to minimize the rents. All work that can be accomplished by the tenant shall be encouraged. Based on the square foot rentable area, a cost of improvements has been estimated. i C. BUDGET* Land Acquisition Item Sub Total Total I Building $165,000 Parking (1) --- $165,000 Architect/Engineer Fees GWG Portion of Building 13,000 13,000 Exterior Construction Roof 5,000 Plantings (removal and replacement) 4,000 Steps 10,000 New Entrances - three 6,000 Linn Street sidewalks 2,800 27,800 * Based on offices, specialty shops and a possible restaurant usage. 1y6/ MILRDEILMED BY 1 "CORM MIC R6LAB- ? �....., CEDAR RANDS DES I4014E5 I 1 LL a r City Council August 12, 1982 Page 5 Interior Construction New Windows - 1903 building 15,000 Common & Hall Areas (Painting and tile work) 19,000 Stairwells 5,000 Miscellaneous: Remove book elevators Remove shelving Replace broken windows 1,500 Mechanical/Electrical Plumbing & Restrooms Fire Protection Central Air Conditioning and Boiler Repairs Electrical New Water Service Tenant Improvements Floor Covering Painting Wiring Partition Work Plumbing Display Fixtures and Equipment Architectural and Engineering Fees Totals based on Rentable square feet Financing/Legal/Insurance Construction Fees and Lendor Fees Legal and Miscellaneous Insurance Interest During Con- struction • 18,000 20,000 50,000 '36,000 3,000 5,000 3,200 12,000 32,000 40,500 127,000 260,000 52,200 ! MICROFILMED BY -"JORM MICR#LAB CEDAR RAPIDS DES MOINES 014 City Council August 12, 1982 Page 6 Total Estimated Cost of Purchase and Remodeling: $685,500 If a restaurant is included in the make-up of the building, an additional cost for insurance, special construc- tion, etc., will need to be added to the total: 20,000 $705,500 Hopefully, this information and the information previously submitted is sufficient for the City to fully evaluate GWG Investments' Old Public Library bid and designate GWG Investments as the "preferred developer". More detailed engineering work, design work, and lease information can be obtained and delivered to the City once a Memorandum of i Understanding has been executed by the City and GWG Investments. Very) truly yours, John D. Cruise JDC/bp Enclosures 1y4i rte._.. ___..._ .... _... \ 1' RICROFILIIED By JORM MICR6LA13 1 CEDAR NAP 705 DES MOINES I Under Steps OWG Mibit Mi Nontb 10 Parking Lot Driveway 1 :41CROFILI•fED BY J -JORM MICR#LA13 CEDAR RAPIDS DES M019ES r. afG Exhibit #2 North ,0 Unn 3t. _ Steps �L i I i i � may■ I Suite G - �++4 .� i li!i�l�y � lti 1 T t i Suite J 4 � s Suite 11 I �1 I Suite Mr I p Entrance Ramp 1' MICROFILMED BY �JORM MICR#LAB -� .. CEDAR RAPIDS DES MOINES CWC Investments Exhibit J3 Showing Front Steps and Future Door Opmi.nr;s Old I%!a Ci Ly Public Library L DORM MICROLAB r HOTEL -MOTEL TAX ACROSS THE STATE (information furnished by the League of Iowa Municipalities) i. Altona 2. Ankeny 3. Cedar Rapids 4. Clive 5. Council Bluffs 6. Davenport 7. Des Moines 8. Dubuque 9. Indianola 10. Johnston 11. Muscatine 12. Sergeant Bluffs 13. SiBux City 14. Urbandale 15. Wacerioo 16. Windsor Heights 5% 5 5% Sb 5% 3% -1st year, 4% -2nd year, 5% -3rd year on 5% 5% 5% 5% 4% 3% 3% 5% 5% 5% Requirements: --The tax must be voted on by the public in a general election (every 2 yrs.) --The tax must not exceed 7% nor be less than 1% --The tax must be a full percentage point, no 2k% tax, etc. --April i is the typical collection date for the tax --Half of the revenue from the tax must go toward cultural/recreational/ tourism -related activities WHAT SOME CITIES DO WITH THE TAX REVENUE (Information furnished by respective City Clerks) Cedar Rapids 100% of the revenue is allocated to city operated functions dealing with cultural/ recreational/tourism activities. A priority system is constructed each year with strict guidelines. This year's system is as follows: 1st priority --Deficit on Five Seasons Center 2nd priority --Deficit on operati expenses of the Paramount Theatre 3rd priority --Convention BureaueuZe&Ell^cTTlliq ISq.00:7 4th priority --Cedar Rapids Art Museum 5th priority --Indian Creek Nature Center/Fine Arts Council Percentages change with the growth of the revenue. Cedar Rapids starts with a base figure to each of the above, and then fills in with additional if necessary. Davenport 90% Debt on Convention Center (small percentage of this goes toward zoo renovation) 10% Convention Bureau Davenport used the majority of the money to sell bonds for the convention center Des Moines 80% Botanical Gardens/Art Center/Renovation of Vets Auditor. 20% Convention Bureau (with this amount not to exceed 5170,000) Before the tax was voted on, the council pledged to place all the money on cultural/recreational/tourism activities. OVER 141CROFILMED BY 1 JORM MICR6LAB J ) CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES I a /ygoa 1 f� Dubuque 100% is used for the debt on Five Flags Civic Center. 15% is -provided to the Convention Bureau from the general fund. This 15% is determined as 15% of the hotel/motel tax revenue, even though that money is all placed in the Civic Center fund. Muscatine 100% returns to the general fund and is used for the art center/library/cultural activities that the council determines. Waterloo 50 Convention Bureau 50% Debt on new Civic Center I, i /4�6dZ 1 1 MICROFILMED BY l - 1 "JORM�"MICR�LAB- CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES CITY OF CN/IC CENTER 410 E. WASHNGTON ST August 11, 1982 Mr. Hynes 621 Dearborn Iowa City, Iowa 52240 Dear Mr. Hynes: OWA IOWA CITY, IOWA 52240 CITY (319) 356-500D At the last meeting of the Committee on Community Needs, August 4, 1982, the CCN expressed a desire to clarify its position regarding recommendations made to the City Council about the Creekside Area flooding problems. The overall Council response to your complaint is that CCN has not seriously considered the issue of funding storm sewer and sewer back up projects as a solution to the problem existing in the Creekside neighborhood and that one reason for this is that CCN no longer has representatives from this area. This is not the case. Since the Committee began to consider recommendations for the Community Development Block Grant Program in January, 1980, the Creekside neighborhood was a constant concern. It was clearly understood that Creekside would be a Strategic Neighborhood Area and that the flooding and sewage problems were top priority. As you observed yourself, "we know... those problems don't have an easy answer." CCN discovered that. It was the understanding of the Committee that other creek projects must be completed before solutions to the drainage problems in Creekside could begin. Beginning in March 1981 through April 1982 it has been clearly stated in all CCN budget recommendations that in 1983, Creekside drainage improvements Phase 1 and 2 would be completed and that in 1984 Phase 3 of the drainage improvement projects would be completed. The City Council accepted CCN's three-year plan in October 1981 which included these improvements. Second, Creekside is represented on CCN. At this time we have three members from the general near east side and one member living on the border of the Creekside boundary. Representation of your neighborhood is not an issue, however. It is the goal of CCN members to represent all of Iowa City's residents and not just our neighborhood and our own special interests. Thank you for speaking out on an issue of importance to us all. Sincerely, Margarei,Bonney, Chairperslfn Committee on Community Needs bj2/5 Enclosures cc: John Balmer Larry Lynch Mary C. Neuhauser David Perret Clemens Erdahl Kate Dickson John McDonald 141CROFILIIED BY CORM MIC RQLAB ' 1 ( CEDAR RAPIDS DES MOINES 1 /y63 7 r City Council Meeting July 20, 1982 Partial Transcript Public Discussion Jim Hynes, 621 Dearborn .there is sewer surcharging and inadequate catch basins at Center and Dearborn Streets for storm water. You promised to do something last year with Block Grant funds - we heard no more, except rumors that funds were diverted, I don't know by whom or why - I'd like to hear from the Council about this. Neuhauser: I don't recall funds being diverted from that - I don't remember it being a recommended project this year - was it? Berlin: Not that I recall. Hynes: ....someone recommended it to the Council, you all agreed that there was a problem. Neuhauser: You are quite right - it's certainly part of our whole Ralston Creek project to try to alleviate that. Is it.backing up from the creek? Hynes: It's not backing up from the creek that is the problem, the storm water from the storm sewer just does not get away, debris will clog the drains - the 12" conduit picks up... the water makes a circuitous route to the creek... it gets into the creek the best way it can. Mr. Farmer made a survey five years ago - those catch basins have to take a large amount of water... the intersection floods, people don't realize how deep it is and cars stall........ The sewer backs into basements on Rundell Street... some people have put in gate valves, but then they can't use their facilities - for years we fought this terrible problem - something has to be done - I can't agree that this is an act of God. I was on the committee on this sewer thing and we know there are problems there and those problems don't have an easy answer, but we have to deal with them. Neuhauser: The only answer to the Rundell Street sewer is the southeast interceptor sewer, the problem is trying to get the funds to be able to build the treatment plant and the southeast interceptor sewer. Hynes: Back in the 50's there was a question about putting in a 6" sewer.... there should have been an interceptor back then.... storm water is a separate problem. Balmer: We've talked about cleaning out that catch basin and I think it was done. Maybe we can go back out and clean it out again. Berlin: Yes, I talked to Mr. Boren about that today, and they do clean it out periodically - but its not actually adequate... I'll dig out the estimate (for replacement). I IiicwrILIIED Ry JORM MICROLAB- CEDAR RAI'105 CIES '401ACS i 1 r Hynes: (Some discussion on solutions to the catch basin problem.) This 'is an intolerable situation. Erdahl: I feel that - I could not be there last year when the Council went out to the area, I've been out there a number of times when it flooded. We did have some controversy over our allocation with the CDBG - and I think that's one we needed a little bit of a reminder on, but I think we have had some good fortune in terms of HCDA funds, and we're going to have a citizen participation process with CCN... which used to have a lot of people from the area on it, it no longer does... a lot of money has been spent on some of the larger problems but I think this is one of the things that we always wanted to get done as part of the overall project, and I think that we will try to stick with it during this coming allocation period. There probably will be some resistance on the committee over this issue, I think it would behoove the neighbors to come in and explain the problem to them, and as a Councilmember I will try to keep my eye on it this year. Neuhauser: It would be helpful if you have any photographs or any of the neighbors have any photographs... Hynes: ....we didn't have film and flash lights.... this issue was raised for Urban Renewal - I urge you to put this in your hat. Balmer: - pleased to hear about it again, because it disappoints me to a certain extent; we get so many new projects for CCN, and I always thought this has been a high priority to alleviate this problem. It's always been an important matter to the Council and I guess I quite honestly forgot. Hynes: ...you appeared to be very favorable towards the project when you were out there and it was your suggestion how it could be solved, and then I hear the funds are being diverted... Neuhauser: I will take personal blame for this Jim, because I did know about the problem and frankly when the allocations came up I don't think we even considered it, and I frankly just forgot about it. You have said that there were the funds available and you were right to say that I think. Hynes: I understand that the sanitary sewer thing is going to be a longer and more difficult problem, but there's not reason we can't deal with this (storm water problem) in the meantime... (Discussion of infiltration problems.) Berlin: ...there were for a number of years representatives from what we call the Ralston Creek area on CCN, people who have lived through this in the past, and that was very helpful. There are not, to my knowledge, people from that area currently on CCN and we talked about that yesterday. And I think it would be very helpful if there are people in that neighbor- hood or you are aware of people who would be interested in serving, have them apply when there's a vacancy. Certainly I think that would give CCN a different perspective than we currently have. MICROf ILMED BY JORM MIC ROLAB j CEDAR RAPIDS • DES 41019[5 i J /fid 3 1 J r Erdahl: - and that doesn't mean - and we di CCN this year, things we did not accept - an projects that the Council decided to fund some projects that the committee was in fav respect to the stormwater project, that t going to mean that this Council will igno that for me this will be top priority; as think we do have funds there. We're not go d have some disagreements with d in fact it was Ralston Creek out of CCN, at the expense of or of, that doesn't mean with he lack of someone on CCN is re this problem. I would say we go through this process I ing to dictate to CCN what its recommendations are going to be, but we are going to... I for one will ask them to consider this and hear what people have to say about the problem and try to follow up on that through the allocation process, because I think $88,000 or $100,000 for a problem that's been going on this long, I think we can afford that out of HCDA and I think we should be looking at that very carefully. Neuhauser: I didn't mean to be facetious about taking pictures but I feel that when CCN has the hearings it's very important for you people to be there and, as I say, explain to them what the problem is, and any kind of evidence you have to show them will be more persuasive and hopefully avoid getting into a big fight as we did this year between the Council and the committee. Perret: I might also add, Clemens did allude to it before, that the City will have saved substantial amounts of money in the bidding for the North Branch Dam... which means we will have a substantial amount of extra money to be allocated.. I certainly would agree with sentiments expressed by other members of the Council that this will have a very high funding priority. (Note: The tape was not always clear and sometimes words were added to make a coherent sentence for reading when something was apparent from the general background conversation.) r MICROFILMED By I -DORM 'MIC ROL4 B� CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES i I I /!/63 1 J PRELIMINARY CDBG BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS: 1982 '84 Program Year 1982 Approved Budget Revised Recommendation 4/82 General Program Administration Community Development Planning $106,493 S 89,847 Economic Development Planning 26,924 51080 16,955 Lower Ralston Creek Improvements Housing Rehabilitation d Weatherization 303,100 5,080 78,300 Housing Code Enforcement 129,000 12,000 145,300 12,000 Public Housing Site Acquis. d Dev. Spouse Abuse Shelter 75,000 75,000 Rental Rehabilitation - 2,610 Independent Living Center _ 75,000 70,000 Congregate Housing 125,774 125,774 Ralston Creek North Branch Improvements - - 16,300 71,205 Contingency 13.403 13.403 Total $671,000 $671,000 Program Year 1983 Staff Rec. CCN Rec. Lower Ralston Creek NSA S 15,000 S 15,000 - property disposition North Dodge NSA Creekside NSA 26,350 26,350 - sidewalk construction - Option (1) drainage improvements, 75,858 150,000 75,858 Phases I E Il 120,000 Housing Rehabilitation d Weatherization (A) 158,000 158,000 Housing Rehabilitation 8 Weatherization (8) 25,000 .g_ Housing Code Enforcement Public Housing Site Acquis. 6 Dev. 13,200 75,000 13.200 Independent/Living Center 70,000 75,000 70,000 Family -Life Home - -0- 55,000 Economic Development Planning 5,588 5.588 Community Development Planning 31,393 31,393 General Program Administration 115,615 115.615 Contingency 14.996 14.996 Total 5776,000 $776,000 Program Year 1984 Creekside NSA - Option (1) drainage improvements, $299,000 $329,000 Phase III Housing Rehabilitation 6 Weatherization ((A) 180,000 180,000 Housing Rehabilitation E Weatherization (8) 30,000 4 - Housing Code Enforcement 14,520 14,520 Public HousingSite Acquis. 6 Dev. 75,000 75,000 Community Development Planning 29,426 29,426 General Program Administration 125,774 125,774 Contingency 22.280 22.280 Total $776,000 $776,000 Mea MICROFILIAID BY 1 JORM MICR6LAS ) CEDAR RAPIDS DES MOINES i ■, Johnson County Health Department Board of Health Director I. 60,.�m pan a•n. MPH dean Brown Mary Dnuey. MD OFFICIAL NOTICE Charles deProsse. MD Keith Hemingway f Evelvn C. Weeber Hand Delivered July 30, 1982 John Wakefield dba Star Port 18-20 S. Clinton Iowa City, IA 52240 Mr. Wakefield: Date' ) (,&k, 3c On July 29, 1982 an inspection was conducted of the restrooms at Star Port. It was found that the plumbing and the floors of the restrooms do not meet the re- quirements of applicable rules and regulations. Section 170A.8 of the Code of Iowa states in part that the plumbing in food service establishments must conform to the minimum requirements of the Iowa State Plumbing Code. Section 6-301 of the Iowa Food Service Sanitation Ordin- ance states in part that the plumbing must be installed and maintained according to law. The drain pipe to which the toilet in the men's restroom is connected has been cut open and patched with what appears to be plaster of paris. You are hereby ordered to have a new section of drain pipe installed to replace the damaged section. This work must be done by a licensedlup mber and must be completed no later than noon, August 11, 1982. Section 7-101 of the Iowa Food Service Sanitation Ordinance states in part that floors shall be maintained in good repair. The floors surrounding the toilets in both of the Star Port restrooms are badly deteriorated and in our opinion will not adequately support a toilet. This will allow the toilets to flex the flange .joint, damage the wax seal, and eventually lead to further leaking of water into the businesses downstairs. The floor must be adequately reoaired no lai•er than noon., August 18, 1982. You are hereby notified that your Food Service Establishment License shall be .suspended at noon on the date stioulated for either repair unless the above corrective action has been taken by said time. You are further notified that all operations involving the *preparation and/or service of food or drink shall cease at the aforemer.tion time. Any person whose License has been suspended may, at any time. make application i for reinspection for the purpose of reinstatement of the License. Within ten (10) days following receipt of a written request, including a statement signed 4nikNc,Ith Center 1105 Gilbpr: Cour: Icwa Cite. Iowa 52240 (319) 351.3085 MICRof ILnED BY -JORM MIC R46LA9 CEDAR RAPIDS DES I401YE5 I I 14,;W -J —:I r F! John Wakefield dba Star Port -2- r July 30, 1982 by the applicant that, in his .opinion, the conditions causing the suspension of the License have been corrected, an authorized representative of the Johnson County Board of Health shall make a reinspection. If the applicant is complying with the requirements of this ordinance, the License shall be reinstated. Approved: Jeryy L. Bartachek Sanitarian Lee G. uameron, M.P.H., R.S. Director cc: Mike Kucharzak Iowa City Couhcil Neal Berlin, City Manager JLB/mek 1 nICRDEIL11ED BY `JORM MICR#LA13 CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOI.IES 1 Cyd e/ 1 Police Department Monthly Report July, 1982 July, 1982 brought an unexpected increase in the number of requests for service received by the Police Department. July, and the other months of summer are generally rather quiet with the reduced number of students, people taking vacation and the like. Summer doldrums did not arrive this year. The 2713 requests for police service ranked second of any month so far in 1982 and reflected an increase of 134 complaints from the June figure of 2579. Increases in the various offense categories, comparing June $ July, follow. Offense Category June 182 July 182 Burglary 18 31 Larceny/Theft 216 221 Forgery/Counterfeiting 4 6 Family/Child Offenses 41 51 OMVUI 18 39 Controlled Substance 3 5 Disorderly Conduct 346 352 Suspicion 54 73 Mental 10 13 Assist and Service 467 517 Attempt to Locate 50 63 Gunshots 6 10 Miscellaneous Investigations 27 36 Dog/Cat/Animals 60 80 Abandoned/Recovered Vehicles 81 96 Parking 148 163 A total of 134 arrests were effected for violation of the criminal law. Some twelve criminal charges were lodged against juveniles. A total of 608 traffic citations and 1755 parking tickets were issued. Ninety-six vehicles were towed for a variety of reasons. Statistical abstracts are appended. /y65 I MIcRorILMED BY � JORM MIC RE1L 49 CEDAR RAPIDS DES MO MES I � I Will Ames become energy= policy leader? •• �CY.P.0. � / �LTY.NLi L /\J. �Q/,i l�. By.1AURENT HODGES GueStu f/IIOR" - _. __Policy Plan could change this Index describes a home's energy dill - p sltrhtlonAnickly'and.estsblish'Anaes "-'c4scy by i s7ngle oilmberto mach es a Mader. Two particularly imova- the same roamer that the energy am- C177ZENS' cotcmittm in tive, ideas have emerged from the deotT a/ a MAW vehicle is described , Aur hes jest compMtN A • Cithees' commrdit ideas that, if sec by its mlleap ratio& The. Amis 'IS mauve and important ea ceseful could have a national Impact Energy PoUry Plan recommends one plan for the Ther deal with the energy dfltlency standard for new homes and a Was. city. Mom then 70appointees east vol. of residential buildings and,the itrict.shedard, for edstlog, rmtal ontaers worked for Wo moods; to. pHringshederefor electric eoergy. milt It meshes m recommrdrmw silt through as enormous n®1 of Nry, bull" codes In the United regardia existing commaccu lad ationg icier and frodace 11 recemrnseda- . Sr. contain provisions designed to ' homaa. P Uaw for the Qty Council's coosddera-: enssra• the energy efficiency of in the arae of electric rtes, the tim As the basis ofTotsa Star Uaiar Tally and o< do low. of The Home. Heating Index describes a home's Transportation, Ames -has many citizensknowledpaws aheut energy, energy efficiency by 'a single number,.in much mend cal soroches bulldtsg the same manner that, the energy efficiency of eeergy4nnal®tfn experts, electri- cal, mechanical and nuclear 8 motor vehicle is described •by its mileage. sen edlfoiiui est te)•t ' , ®.:rating. , - engineer, solaFaorgy piaose s ad ' bWldings, eitber-new or existing reporr recommends umewf-use tramportauae+oergy Specialists, bdWloW or be& Those enew codes pricing and a vigorous peak -load - One might have expected A have often contained lists of .1 pre, management program — policies community with stl. e:' ' to ..sft"W staodarde es much W11111 -that would have hese tsmvative to have been the Sawa of Imorauve flea in the attic, limits on the smoem years &g% bat already Cir in place in es; energy Ideas over the yesand to be of windows, • certain types of weather- many Iowa communities. ahead of other Cities In dealing with stripping around doors and windows, The report deals with one' of. the energy problems I and an forth. - thorniest problems of electric rates in However, with on exception —tib Plasm Pita standards have major an unusual and promising fashlaa building At a solid -waste facility ddWU@s, each M the fad that they The problem is the unpopular producing I of ,rived. /s.1 for the may toe" the bW&g owner to take increase In rate often necessitated Amex Monicipal UUUty — Ames hesmnemes that are rot enonsmtc for a by energy conservation. As not base In the faShoet As public particularbuliding, consumers reduce their eon my use, awa meas of the energy crisis ap- A better choke for an energy code the oUUty's messes no longer cover proarh.s Its 10th anniversary, Ames L tour A "performance' standard their cosok.and the price per kijit finds itself to the rather•curioes that expresses howmergydficienta hour most be nixed. owe position of beginning to study worth- banding mot bok and leaves It up to . The Ames report proposes (Omaha while concepts already Inatltmed by the owner to choose the, most Such rate tscm' unnecessary by small ,communities, sock. sa Oeap practical or economic method of initiating two types of charges to andHoland attabdol the standard. 770 major cuntomen: a fixed charge and Adoption of the recommendations problem with this Spprosch has been variable charge. The fixed charge In the new Ames Energy and Water the lads of a simple, easily measured, would be based on the maximum � technicallyncesamd elergl'•perfor- power contracted for by the customer, and would be chore to Laareal Hodgen,. professor of The Ames Energy Policy Plan • ensure that the utility'& ftsed cats physics W extend" ewU speei& Seemingly has solved this problem by (such an interest payments) were W at fewa Star Udwedry, chaired recommending the use of the Hare covered by the nam of the cu tomer's the Ames E KM and Water Policy Heating Index developed at Iowa .fixed Charges. A lad limiter ImtaUed PWIIIeertsgGrmittr. State University The Home Heating by the utility would restrict /e/6 6 I _ �I T 11CPNILITO nes J L JORM MICROLAB \ ' CCA(,N RAPIDS •PCS 10I4E; r customers to their contracted -maximum kilowatts. The variable charge would be kilowatt boon) of �tomyr laid would be sat to COIN the utwws variable cow (seek es fssl comb). warp OMMUUn by enwom Willbet oo�ffxeddata Mans coemases Variable s. tion Will eedsewaenicowsvart * charges bet not his or: bar f&4 charM es raft incresse would be made necessary by Rates would Cestlsw le chi ep over the years a the WWs ffssd am wi" vrate le��e.� Yw� olld moppm. Amu is tivi Most its ale particularly Mies b beam isth!J hew rises simply Is recent yam Jim aweng the lowest is the wft(o tothisride banbeene�spnsfte�of theiicfrom it cu AmseManipalUeae S ig to jig myswaft, Shm Ames cestoMsRm sneer owed evve as much as q4 mopwatta, exe* for a few het summer weekdays when the ak4xw nd Is high. tko fixed cum arsocf ted with this kegs excess is as it a Cow with onlybaggerft an W IMM L a tow -bedroom be= were to buy. enmthar how with throw bedrooms thto ftmen0no ��r archildren simulleesossly with lWr (amliiast : HBO bMs is lati Musser IiTbI 1l when the City Ceencii NUUMed a SPmenber Energy and Water Policy Plan Steering Committee. Six task forces ware an �deelin{�se,6 1 cial and 10- ws From taR the task foyer awmW�W vOq�y Passible Policies and prepared reports. Nn�tengsrehexx The steering enmities through the neemwesdatlass aii Prepared w ffssl repot will the 4b r.eemmm*uos exh Polley lees:. hide bums is a n�n`�cpV benefits and priority, The Amo Qty Council bas directed the city staff to sbdy the hiiliaprkei-. ty Policies so maks its own rococo mend f� m. tbOver We next on" it will become evident jest bow tar and tart Ames will proceed in implementing' the policies choose by its citixn deliborades bays {oee•into the *pap pY1Wad upset and may mon an Ilhaiy to be space on its no- ammesdattaca With the Importance, of eeeep to modern society, and the eOOrMollsevaa,t hoerwasp� 611CRDrIL11E0 Dv JORM MOCR46LAB j CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES /W if J r Why balance WASBII'IOTON, D.C. TWs ha to announce the formation of a new movement MP BRA. ' BBA stands for the balanced 4ad{et ameedmnt Tho alm�ple lut=e nnini h� r what a w111 do � F. cg re.terrible. Little da you old fdb home, that thw amendment wW cut _= t oil Social 'tSrcemt i MFU Dema' --n 8Tesu, You bettor JIM your Medicare Dow. there won't be any lettwho this WM Para lAttle m you young folks know that Yom may have to start paying for year own school boob henna of this amasdment. Scholl Inadtes will be a tWee d the eau There will be masa little do yea working people know that your deduction for mortmw this new piece of legislative magc. voted by vow UsitedStages Samus. to sau u so nor ewe paper tap or shoeboxes.. And you poor folb who have to - rely on public foods to support your sick Little child or rely on Medicaid to Became this t will fora cutbacks in military saLrir, no one will want to Join the voluntary army anymore. So the nation will have to go tach to the draft And you know what that mum You young women ate ging to be drafted to sun along with too. You now know who your bunkmate will be. Following the sanest of the last movement to stop a comiltutlesai amendment ilith Phyllis Sthlafly in the leadership role, we urge all Americans worried about the Im. plications of the BBA to Joie In a L ­ b�lme 'mON TNE- Sy BILI: N611IIRI1 man rally here Ister,this week. Remember to bring your hounmade STOP BBA sign and your homemade brand. which can be yeast nut or fruit tread. Remember that's constitutional ammdtnet'cas be defeated at the state level. Schlafly showed eretyonb bow. EWeryoce mot orguive at the grasrtoota level to show away the real motivation behind this amendment It's amore than a rue to nyeua muttery DICHIM LM,t It odd t the ScoM voted for It tight after HmM Reagan anosoced that -be aren't ging to. cut the military budget? AB we SMP-BBAees should knew why. Members of the. Smote don't want to low thea military contracts in their districts: Can big moot' buy a constitutional ameadmmt? What we'rnWy don't know far. sun about the pro -BBA campaign Is who is really financing It. Well, you can be sure that with the -president behind it federal money. from the Us Twver= is bound to be involved. And we all know abets the MS_Treanry borrows lads of its; money, don't we? You goosed 11. Tho. Arab oil sheiks. It's our own pehadol- Ism paying for this thing. First they get an at the pump. Then they take It away -a second flora. Of naw, they am all irk league with the big oil compacta Need the evidence? The man• who cast the deciding .'vote In, the Santa, was Senator Rossi f oag-` (Does:.. LL): Mr. OB himself. Need we say muse? The thing that STOP-BBAers should know is that it's them or us. I/ you're noun to ba nee the budger you curer have to raise taxa cut the ,icrunL,.,lu e• JORM MICROLAB ctnnu Nnrttx nI'aoiars &4(�Chem roe. STOP BBAers like a balanced budgetof coarse. We jot don't want it stuffed down our threats and does la a. way that's harenfal to our Interests. That's the reason for this grass-roots movonwnt. If Reagan wants his BBA, he's going to haw to fight forlt fit hen come to Back Astebooe and chain himself to the entrance of the legis - latah. Let Nanny go on hanger strikes. Let Strom Thurmond and Orrin Bikk and Jahn Toww get their man 'marches organized and make Bay *and= for It. The bedlam How is whether Cheek Percy will,bms his undershorts in favor of this amendment Mat Alm Mete try to pressure the Mischa Cesaal Assembly to ckasge the tkrowfifthe majority requirement for constitutional amendments, something the pro -ERA people could nava do. IA him deal with Mayor Jane Byrne. But we doubt seriously that any of the ptoBBAes war go eat and fight, this ameadmnt on their own We have It on good authority that some members of Congress are going to - enlist their pages is the fight STOP BBA Is a mnemeat that will now that we need yea? - e ma nv� crr.r t.ron ec /W7 91 J r - 1hrvyv a) S/r4 City of Iowa Cit" Date: August 16, 1982 To: City Council From: Pat Keller, Planner Re: Historic Preservation Ordinance At the City Council meeting on August 3, 1982, there was concern expressed over the size and flexibility of the boundaries that would be proposed following adoption of the Historic Preservation Ordinance. The survey conducted for the National Register of Historic Places covered three different areas with a total of 1,400 buildings. The finalapplication submitted by the State covered four areas with a total of 1,283 buildings. (Only a proportion of these buildings are considered to be of historic significance.) The breakdown is as follows: AREA # OF BUILDINGS A 50 B 15 C 90 D 260 E 580 F 288 The total population of this area according to the 1980 Census is approximately 4,485 individuals and 2,068 households. The total population of Iowa City at that time was 50,508, with 18,594 households. bcl/2 1 I i MICRO(ILMED BY 1 -JORM MICR#LAO CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES IAlm 7m 1 fr HISTORIC STRUCTURES INVENTORY SURVEY AREAS PROPOSED IJORTH SIDE HISTORIC DISTRICTS 1. North Side Neighborhood Survey Area MM North Side Commercial District » 2 North Side Residential District 2. "Goosetown" Neighborhood Survey Area 3. College Hill Neighborhood Survey Area 111CR01ILRED B1' JORM MICROLAB I CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOMES /f�6 7a/ ., 1 IF a l I Cr ',ETt RY W �U F .: CEMETERY _J TOWN STREET. F rn i �W F ; I I IJI--I . 1 CHURCH FAIRCHILD MARKE umuut STREET u uQu._ _ J�j22 m 1.L1 _ 1 •• ED1" Vr'.: LI III .Ii f 2 Ii ,d ° °..•[• ST.-[TFAIRCHILD EN ST DAVENPORi yy a tl'E I•JJ: ,�,•�y H d CURRENT AND PROPOSED IOWA CITY, IOWA NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES DISTRICTS: EXISTING DISTRICTS: A. SUMMIT STREET DISTRICT B. WODDLAWN DISTRICT PROPOSED DISTRICTS C.. NORTH SIDE COMMERCIAL DISTRICT D. NORTH SIDE RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT E. GOOSETOWN DISTRICT F. COLLEGE HILL DISTRICT n ' H ST WASH. T. 'I �r�ISJ7�lft CCU t� � E wn milli, io 111 o WERT 7^ Bow. W Ll —1 Ff S.1 - V S r _J I4ICROFILI4ED B4' JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS DES MOINES i r.v txK+[ LOW CI io* N s<cx 1 Yi,t. - ate[ N 1�� W NN N to i �'� V�ST � aJEFFERSO ST_AVE. n ' H ST WASH. T. 'I �r�ISJ7�lft CCU t� � E wn milli, io 111 o WERT 7^ Bow. W Ll —1 Ff S.1 - V S r _J I4ICROFILI4ED B4' JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS DES MOINES i r.v txK+[ LOW CI io* N s<cx 1