Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1981-09-08 Correspondence,lECEWEU AUG 2 8 1981 3114 Raven Street Iowa City, Iowa August 26, 1981 The Hon. John Balmer Mayor of Iowa City Civic Center j Dear Mayor Balmer: i This morning just prior to 7 a.m. as I sat reading the Cedar Rapids Gazette account of the Council's action on a proposed noise pollution ordinance, my attention was drawn to the sound of a motorcycle being run up through four or five gears at what must have been a considerable speed. I calculated that the vehicle must have been about a mile away, north and somewhat to the west of my location. Perhaps you heard it too. It was an appropriate accompaniment to my reading. I wondered what citizens who live along the path of that motorcycle must have thought. Two acquaintances have remarked to me in recent months how much more aware they are of the sounds of Iowa City since they began using their air conditioning less (to 'keep costs down). I think it is likely that more and more citizens.will become so aware in the future, and that there may develop more sentiment in favor of noise abatement than now exists. i In my 30 years in Iowa City I have come to appreciate many excellent qualities about it. Citizens such as you who have served on the Council can take credit for helping create and maintain such qualities. In that connection, it is gratifying to me to learn that the City Council is willing to look into the question of whether there is any help and guidance available from the League of Municipalities on this matter of noise abatement. I£ the problem can be recognized for what it and dealt with, Iowa City will once again demonstrate the difference between being here and any place else. Si erely, 0 Don MLQuillen 1311 MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES I401NES K October 30, 1981 Dr. William S. Moeller 2650 S. Riverside Drive Iowa City, Iowa 52240 Dear Dr. Moeller: The City Council received your letter regarding noise problems in Iowa City and I requested that the staff investigate the two problems which are mentioned in your letter. The findings are summarized below. Runway 17 (south runway) formerly was designated as the preferential runway. This caused problems both south and north of the airport for residents living in the approach zone. Recently the Airport Commission passed a resolution designating runway 24 (southwest runway) as the preferential runway. When wind conditions allow, runway 24 will be used and the use of runway 17 should be greatly j reduced. Also, it seems that aircraft making a low approach under high power settings create excessive noise. To alleviate this situation the Federal Aviation Administration has installed VASI (visual approach slope indicator) lights to cue the pilot when he is below the proper I approach path. In addition, to further reduce the noise level to the south of the airport a pilot awareness program has been initiated so Pilots will extend their outbound leg farther south before making a j left-hand turn (to the east), thus avoiding overflying your area. It is hoped that these measures will make living near the airport more tolerable. Mr. Showalter has investigated your complaint regarding the motorcycles at Mesquakie Park. When Mr. Showalter received the first complaint, he instructed the motorcycle club to install mufflers on all cycles. They agreed and no cycles have been run without mufflers since. The cycle noise was measured with a decibel meter from a point close to your address, with a reading of less then 70 decibels. Both the trucks on Highway 218 and the airplanes produced a higher reading. The permit which has been issued to the motorcycle club clearly states that the permit can be revoked if there is a noise problem. Based on our finding, we do not believe that the noise level from the cycles is high enough to warrant this action. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICRO_ LAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOINES I Dr. W. Moeller ~ _ October 30, 1981 Page 2 There is no mention of snowmobile use in the permit, and no plans to issue such a permit. If you have any other questions or concerns relating to City services, please give me a call. Sincerely yours, Neal G. Berlin City Manager / cc: City Clerk be/sp j MICROFILMED BY `JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOINES V RrCGIVEO AUG 3 1 1981 162. 'WdItam 4 ov`OdleR 2650 S Riverside Dr. IOWA CITY. IOWA 52240 PHONE 13101 338.7400 August 24, 1981 Iowa City Council Civic Center 410 East Washington Iowa City, Iowa 52240 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: I wish to register two complaints. 1) We have read in the newspaper where there has been a recording of the airport noise and this is to remind you that we have never been consulted. We are a group of people who live just south of the airport within the Iowa City limits. When the airplanes are using the southern takeoff areas they cut their patterns short and veer most commonly to the left which would be east. They are commonly gaining altitude as they go right over our living area. This, is when the students and others were practicing takeoff and landings, represents a constant drone of airplanes and this is not on the same level as the cars, etc. that go pass on Highway 218. They do not disturb our ability to talk: to one another whereas the airplanes drown us out completely. 2) This is a Sunday afternoon that I am dictating this letter. The motorcycle noise is still present and it is now 5:00 p.m.. lie have talked to Mr. Dennis Showalter with no results. It is impossible for us to understand how the city has sought to preserve the river side south of Iowa City, protect the wild life and yet issue permits for motocycles (and probably snowmobile) race track to be established along the river side within the city limits. This produces such an irritating constant loud roaring of engines and we can only presume that those who permitted this do not live in this area and have no empathy for those who wish to enjoy the tranquility of this lovely weather and scene. We presume the city council is not aware that this land has been leased for this purpose and we think it is contrary to the human and animal cultural needs. While Iowa City has no noise ordinance and there may not be any legal action we can take, we certainly are trying to give you the first opportunity to correct this "blunder". Thank you kindly for your attention to this matter. I am citing this as a representative of the people living in this area. Sincerely, u" s 7" ....itr_, Dr. William S. Moeller WSM/rdm MARRIAGE COUNSELING • PERSONAL COUNSELING . GROUP THERAPY MICROFILMED BY 'JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES IWINES i3ad C _.t - c. mid _ ._ E i - � C I fir TY OF IOWA CITY CIVIC CENTER 410 E. WASHINGTON ST. IOWA CITY, IOWA 52240 (319) 356-500D October 30, 1981 Mr. William McGlynn, Jr. 1110 N. Dubuque, Apt. 501b Iowa City, IA 52240 Dear Mr. McGlynn: i I have investigated your proposal to the City Council regarding a bridge between Terrill Mill Park and City Park. A pedestrian/bicycle bridge would be advantageous for all of the reasons you state in your The es the cost of a ride comparable to ItheEbike-walkgbr dge o outhloftHancher to be $315,000 plus the approaches on each side. However, the City will reduce spending for capital improvements in the immediate future because of j high interest costs and the limited availability of other funding sources. In addition, many other projects, such as the I reconstruction of existing bridges, have a much higher priority than i new projects. Sincerely yours, I INeal G. Berlin i City Manager I cc: City Clerk bc5/16 i MICROFILMED BY 'JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES t _P.gk.iiv C7 P4 C1`y Par k " -, 'os ledwam, � /qe 7 •_ ' a r god GI 1 v -o MICROFILMED BY DORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES A -)13a1 I MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 1401NES Vi - 1\ f2,ze L. ✓ Leg .... . . MICROFILMED EY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES ---- ---------- - ----------- irl; 0 501 b 3� ..r V- L." �� August 31, 1981 Mayor John Balmer City of Iowa City Civic Center Iowa City, Iowa 52240 Dear Mayor Balmer and all members of the Iowa City Council: It has been brought to my attention that during the last City Council meeting, Councilman Roberts reported that he had received complaints about the quality of the Council cablecasts. I was on vacation and out of the city at that time. Thus the lateness of my response. I would offer the following as appropriate responses for any of the Council members when confronted with a complaint from a local citizen. 1. The Council meetings are cablecast under less than adequate conditions for quality production. Better lighting is needed and a new sound system would help greatly. 2. The cameras and other necessary equipment are sometimes in need of repair and thus we work with what is available for each Council meeting. Often only one camera is available, when two would be preferable. 3. The necessary equipment is stored at the Library and must be loaded into a car and then unloaded again at the Civic Center. It would be much more convenient and less time consuming, if additional equipment were made available and kept at the Civic Center. 4. The process of setting up the equipment begins shortly after 5:00 PM and continues non-stop until shortly before the Council meeting begins at 7:30. Much effort goes into arranging the lighting at the best possible locations and tests are always done to be sure that the quality is the best possible under the conditions. 5. The reverse procedure of taking down, putting away and returning everything to the Library takes a fair amount of time also. 6. The people operating the lights, cameras, audio and all the other equipment are volunteers. They have been trained in workshops by Drew Shaffer or Karen Kalergis during this past year. These volunteers are citizens who were interested enough to learn the necessary procedures so that other citizens could stay in their homes to view the Council meetings. 7. In addition to receiving no compensation for their services, the volunteers have already put in at least an eight hour day on the Jo' 5or in classes, skipped dinner and know before they begin that they won't return home until at least 9:30 or 10:00 PM. B. Encourage the complainers to participate in the workshops and learn the necessary skills to actively participate in the cable - casts. If they can do a better job than we do, great! We don't claim to be video wizards. We are participating because we enjoy MICROFILMED BY 'JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 1401NES 13aa_ -1 n i Mayor John Balmer August 31, 1981 Page 2 the challenge of learning something new and because we enjoy the idea of making information available to people in their homes as it is happening, not the following morning in print or on the radio. Because the cablecasts are live, our mistakes are made right there in front of our whole audience. I think the following paragraph written by Drew Shaffer best sums up the purpose of community access channels and what the volunteers hope to achieve. "Public access is not television. It doesn't pretend to be, doesn't want to be, doesn't have to be. It will not look like any other television programs. It's not supposed to. Public access programming is much more like the telephone than television. Its purpose is to tell the community about itself. To give locally relevant messages to the locality. To create new avenues of expression and opinion in an otherwise commercially, slick oriented media. Public access is not TV. It's community communications." Sincerely, �� �e^ Joan Jehle, Ac ess.Iowa City Volunteer _ Channel 20 - Iowa City Public Channel 29 - Iowa City Government Channel Channel Channel L , I MICROFILMED BY 'JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES 13 as 4 Crestwood Circle Iowa City, IA 52240 Phone: 338-5186 September 2, 1981 City Council c/o Neal Berlin Iowa City Civic Center 410 E Washington Iowa City, IA 52240 To The Members Of The City Council: I am approaching you about locating a TACO JOHN'S in the downtown Iowa City area of which I would be the owner -manager. I have lived in the Iowa City area for all of my life, and my family is and has been involved in various businesses in Iowa City. I have been involved with TACO JOHN'S for the past four years in Coralville and I was directly involved in the establishment and growth of the franchise there. Currently, I have left the Coralville franchise and have gained approval from Woodson -Holmes Entp., Cheyenne, Wyoming, to establish a TACO JOHN'S somewhere in the Iowa City area. I am interested in the property located between the Blackhawk Mini Park and the Dain Bosworth brokerage office on the plaza downtown, as of now this parcel is not part of the park. TACO JOHN'S has a good reputation not only in Coralville, but also in the Midwest of being clean, courteous, and well aware and intermingled with area concepts and designs. As you may be well aware, the original TACO JOHN'S building in Coralville was a trailer type modular. At this time, I would like to erradicate any misconceptions there might be about the type of structure that would be raised on the downtown property. In discussion with various members of the City employ, it has been demonstrated to me some of the preferences the City has for this area. First, I am able to bring in a component building manufactured by Holmes Camper Inc., Cheyenne, Wyoming, and face it's exterior to suit the Urban Renewal concept to fit the plans of the city. Second, I can approach the City with a concept on a site built building also fitting the Urban Renewal design in coordination with a design committee or department of the City of Iowa City. Because of the franchise from TACO JOHN'S Inc., I am at great freedom to work with the City on exterior design of the premises. j MICROFILMED BY 'JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES -MOINES 130-13 . ..X. page 2 Advantages of TACO JOHN'S 1. This company is greatly known for its strict standards which far surpass any city or county levels at this time. 2. Our success in this area is due to our concern with courteous service, a clean atmosphere, and with our concern for the needs and wants of customers and employees. 3. Our involvement with community and student activities and programs has been greatly demonstrated over the years in Coralville. 4. In direct regard to downtown property, it is our concern of retaining a downtown mini -park and plaza area beautiful and clean as an advantage not only to the citizens and students in the community, but also any business located there. It has been brought to my attention that the City is concerned with of what to do with that area changing in the future and the availability of being able to use the property for something different in the future if the City so desires. This is why I have approached you with the idea of leasing the property. I feel that my company would fit in well with the downtown area and the whole of Iowa City. I would like to request at this time that I be allowed to be present I at the discussion of this proposal by the Council. I feel that I have a better ability to answer questions and show you my ideas and feelings if I am present. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Wj 7. Michael T. Brawner j MICROFILMED BY 'JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES 023 To the Honorable 6f ^ r and Membere of the Iowa Ci' 'Council: This letter is with regard to congregate meals priority. City Manager Ileal Berlin has advised me that he is preparing a contract to be signed by the Board of Supervisors, in which they agree that any program which they may overate in the Senior Center will com,ly with all federal and state laws and will be accurately advertised. That notice 2icongregate how essential itwhich is thatappeared havelast suchyatcontr,ct. Press -Citizen (Aug.r• 29)9) shows The first sentence of that notice reads: "A person aged 60 or older and the spouse of tle person regardless of age, are eligible to participate in congregational nutrition services in accord with state and area plans." That means exactly nothing because it doesn't state "what person". Is it a low income person with limited mobility, a well-to-do, able bodied person, or what Y It mentiones state and area plans, but congregate meals is a federal welfare program. The word "priority isn't even mentioned even though thre is money enough for only 150 meals a day and there are more than 7,000 persons in Johnson County who are 60 years old or older, and in addition there are a large number of younger spouses. I called the Senior Center information department this morning, and in reply to my questions the girl who answered told me that the meals are being served at the Center on a first-come, first -,service basis, and that no reservations were needed. I asked if there was any priority for those persons with special needs, she didn't know. I asked if a needyyerson wanted to be sure that a meal would be available for him-hShe ser each dathe could make a reservation and be assured of priority. s y could do that by making reservation at Autum 'Park, as they are taking reservations there. Doesn't it look as though they are trying to keep the needy (social and economic) out of the Senior Center and planning to send them to Autumn Park to be fed? That certainly wouldn't be right. A SUGGESTION: I would like to make a suggestion for giving priority to those with social or economic needs, and at the same time keeping most, if not all, of those hho have been using the service, happy. The plan is this: Instead of trying to send those entitled under the law to priority to Autumn Park, permit them to ask for a standing reservation at the Center if they wish to eat at 1; act five meals per week. Since those with standing reservations could come in and be served at any time between 11:30 and 1 and would not be singled OUT, in any way. The number of meals over and above the number reserved could be put up on a first-come, first serve basis, and might take care of most, if not all of those who have been using the service. As for those entitleddby law to priority, such a plan would give them a choice. They could either ask for a standing reservation, or take their chances on getting one of the meals not reserved for those entitled to priority. I am continuing to stand up for the elderly who have difficulty making it on their own. The Older American Act is on their side too. N Exhibit "A" PRIORITT and Exhibit "B", Dept.of Health a Human Services are inclosed. %Z`e-`� '-V_ A tax.:ayer and a vo tutee watch -dog. J Q 1530 Shriiden Avenu . eJ N eptember 1, 1981. I� �- P.S. Please send a cocu of this letter to lork Benz, to vh re with o N W Otte 1'Ieicol and with Yi.cheel ster; and to the Senior Center Commission n n m _nd the Council of Elders. and definitely to our City Attorney; P L� m to the Board of Supervisors. Q' 13c2Y MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES I EXHIBIT "A" - PRIORITY 1976 AME14DED ACT portation,• which provide social assistance in a coordinated manner and which arc readily available when needed. (9) Immediate benefit from proven research kt.ow'Iedge which can sustain and improve health and happiness. (10) Freedom, independence, and IIIc free exercise of individual initiative in planning and managing their own :ivas.• DEFINITIONS Sec. 10:. For the purposes of this Act— ( I ) 'I he term "Secretary" means the Scctctary of Health, Education, and Welfare. 'The 1973 Amendments, sec. 101 inrcocd ", including access to low. cost transportation;'. 'In addition to the Declaration of Objectives of the Older Americans Act, embodied in see. 101, the 1973 Amendments cared their objectives, as follows: "SLC. 101. The Congress finds that millions of older citizens in this Nation are suffering unnecessary harm Iron, she lack of adequate services. 1t is therefore the purpose of this Act, in rapport of the objectives of the Older Americans Act of 1965, to— (1) make available comprehemive program: which include a full range of health, education, and social services to our older citizens who need them, 0) give full and special consideration to older dozens with special needs in planting such programs, and, pending the mailability of such / programs for all older citizens, Fire priority to the elderly with the \I greatest economic and social need, (3) provide ttmnprehenrive programs which will assure the eanrdi- rated delivery of a full range of essential services to our older etriteas, and, where applicable, also furnish meaninglut en:ploymrnt oppnrnmf- ties far many individuals, inchrding older person, young persons, and volunteers from the community, and Ni insure that the planning and operation of such programs will be undertaken as a partnership of older cilias, community agencies, and State and local governments, n'Yth appropriate assistance from the Federal Government," 1978 AMENDME'':TS TITLE 1—Ahl t..1M.M :NT.S TO THE' OLDER AMERICANS ACT OF 1765 1. The following are the reasons _why, in the serving of congregate meals in the Senior Centter, priority should be given to those persons with chrtain economic or social needs, as defined in Sec. 1321.3 of the rules and regula- tions adopted by Congress on Mch. 31, 1980. Sec. 102 (2) of the Older American Act, as amendeed, provides that special consideration be given to older citizens with special needs in the planning of programs, and'pendiing the availability of such programs for all older citizens, give priority to t�p4gjderjy with -tHe Brea es economic or social nee -. :3. Since "older" and "elderly" can mean anything from 40 years of age to 100, Section 1321.141(b)(1) sets the age for participation in the congregate meals program at age 60 or older, and provides for including spouses,any age. 1, In his letter of Dec. 19, 1980, b1 . In Atwell, of the Dept, of Health and Human Services, Washing- ton, D.C.wrote: "The age elikibility and emphasis on those with the great- est economic or social need are recuirements of the Older American Act, as amended." I quote from the legal opinions of County Attorney Jack W. Dooley and his First Assistant J. Patrick White:dated Jan. 16, 1976 and Oct. 7, 181. �Oct.7, 1980, F'age 2) "Each area on aging is now reeuired to prepare a 111an for a three year period. . . This plan is reeuired to ''rovide:assurance that preference will be given to _Rrovidin� services to older individuals with the greatest economic or social needs.' " (Oct. 7, 1980, page 3) It (the plan) to be valid, should,further in some fashion the three stated legislative purposes and five__krofnrence to t=ose with the greatest economic or social needs. (Jan. 16, 1976) "It is. our opinion that administrtion of the congregate meals program in Johnson County, to whatever extent it is or has been operated on an open door or blanket eligibility policy is in violation of the federal statute which established the program and the regula6iions which have implemented it." (Oct. 7, 1980, page 3.) "The Comprehensive Older American Amend- ments of 1970 did not envision an open door or blanket m6Als'.;pio�ram." . . . An individual congregate meals program should be available to peroons on on some basis of either economic or social need." And yet, our congr(-gate mer.lc procr�;m, acc,)rding to the weekly notice in the Preen Citizen, and according to the informational folder which has been circulated, is being operated on an o;en door or blanket eligibility policy, with priority not even bein[, mentioned. Congregate meals ie public welfare and co is subject to certr.in definite reg:lationn, the came or. food stemils, S.S.I. Title IX. Title XX, and nil other forms of public welfare -- I MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 1401NES EXHIBIT "B" 011irr, nl I) Ii PA R'I',111i MI' O P 11. .1:1'11 .\ 11 11 Al AN S I. It 1' I ('FS Human Development Services Administration on Aging Washington OC 20201 I ik.l�' 1 J tls. Della Crizel 1530 Sheridan Avenue Iowa City, Iowa 52240 Dear Ms. Grizel: Thank you for your letter of November 17 in which you request clarification about the eligibility criterion for congregate nutrition services given in Section 1321.141(b)(1) of the Title III regulations. Your letter asks two separate questions. First, are all persons age 60 or over (and their spouses regardless of age) eligible to participate in congregate nutrition services? Second, if this is true, does this fact detract from or completely supersede the emphasis found elsewhere in the regulations on serving those with greatest economic or social need? Before addressing your specific questions, permit me to clarify one point. The age eligibility and emphasis on those with greatest economic or social need are requirements of the Older Americans Act, as amended; and are simply repeated in the regulations. In response to your specific concerns, under the Act and the regulations any person age 60 or over and the spouse of such a person, regardless of age, is eligible to receive congregate nutrition services. At the same time, the Act and regulations indicate that a priority should be given to serving those older persons with the greatest economic or social need. Priority in this context is meant to indicate the emphasis which should be given to serving those older persons in greatest need; but it does not mean other older persons are ineligible for services. Understandably, it may be difficult to maintain a proper balance between the criterion of age only as an eligibility requirement and the criterion of serving those in greatest need. For additional guidance on this matter you may wish to contact your local area agency on aging or Mr. Glen R. Bowles, Executive Director, Commission on Aging, 415 West 10th Street, Jewett Building, Des Moines, Iowa 50319; telephone (515) 281-5187. Sitcerel.y yours, Willis Atwell Associate Commissioner for Program Development MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES M0111ES /,32(/ L. 1 -1 r� y trcl �r,,ycY��! � �.r.::cL!•' l,L.zO 1/<.t�,Qaryc- KFac(, �9 i �Uup; j �it u,/Lilc;;`9 �' 'lu✓�J;�+t/v,��,'�r l.�l!�.CJslioaz�o�� Biu C U�II a qz0� ¢���U7✓L/U.�IL�Yi,c��Gi� cs� G�� ntf � ' ' J�%✓f Gd Q� 1 t/uslo � �.a¢ Ca Gs%i¢ �IOLGr- cru �Ya->�r �e �¢QXLI�^Gl ��l1rJCl� �f�ir J nyQ� �7mL���d�cr Yf0'7J1� ��14i Ali/%f�� � CLItGi liL(1LG� nth IGJrC/�i¢caZu, lL,cc+' IRAQQ��n� . �� Z !Q i Y�/r ,OLLicGl.aOduivJ. rru �¢ CG rocsx �, �G�alLza�e��oY oxo do• �.,u+' ca r� �/Gt�oC.I. r/cr.�, .cr�� r/,r. C'QLLOC CFitlot 010-114a r2r�lo Cp Zo71t�c , GYIL�Pnu�v lx � � l/ �t r�al�iicG/ �Ganu , "OUT rro> ✓Civ low Qe, I /Vim Jrn... MICRDFILMED BY 'JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES 13a5 .1 CITY OF IOWA CITY CIVIC CENTER 410 E. WASHINGTON ST IOWA CITY IOWA 52240 (319) 354.18(£0 Date August 11, 1981 i TO: The Honorable Mayor and the City Council RE: Civil Service Entrance Examination - Police Dispatcher We, the undersigned members of the Civil Service Commission of Iowa City, Iowa, do hereby certify the following named persons in the order of their standing as eligible for the j position of Police Dispatcher/Police Department Monica Claman Helen Niesen j I I IOWA)CITY CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION G J!,/K Anderson i Arletta Orelup CBruce Walker ATTEST: , Abbie Stolfus, City Clerk MICROFILMED BY 'JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES CITY OF CIVIC CENTER 410E WASHINGTON ST. IOWA CITYIOWA CITY, IOWA 52240 (319) 354.180 Date _ July 28 1981 TO: The Honorable Mayor and the City Council RE: Civil Service Entrance Examination - ClAr4 Tvnict We, the undersigned members of the Civil Service Commission Of Iowa City, Iowa, do hereby certify the following named Persons in the order of their standing as eligible for the Position of Clerk Tvoist/Senior Center Jill Smith Elizabeth Clow Alison Mazula WA"C.ITY CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION i. 1. , Jyte Anderson /p� Arletta Orelup ATTEST: ✓Cl�.t Bruce 14alker Abbie Stolfus, City Clerk j MICROFILMED BY 'JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS -DES Id01NES ,— — — AW CITY OF IOWA CITY (.;IVIG CENTER 410 E. WASHINGTON ST. IOWA CITY IOWA 52240 (319) 354.18(3) Date Auguct �a 1gR1 I TO: The Honorable Mayor and the City Council RE: Civil Service Entrance Examination - Cashier Permanent Part-time We, the undersigned members of the Civil Service Commission of Iowa City, Iowa, do hereby certify the following named persons in the order of their standing as eligible for the position of Cashier/Parking Systems Rosalie Shuh IOWA -,CITY CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION r arse Anderson Arletta Orelup Bruce Walker ATTEST: Abbie Stolfus, City Clerk I MICROFILMED DY JORM MICROLAB 'CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES /3ac'