HomeMy WebLinkAbout03-09-2017 Historic Preservation CommissionIowa City Historic Preservatio
Thursday
March 9, 2017
n-
5:30 p.m.
' ( J
�v
S.Illlr.
Emma Harvat Hall
City Hall
n Commission
L.
;1
or oV +ow�i Q�
_ _ A�81 •n
IOWA CITY HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
Thursday, March 9, 2017
City Hall, 410 E. Washington Street
Emma J. Harvat Hall
5:30 p.m.
A) Call to Order
B) Roll Call
C) Public discussion of anything not on the agenda
D) Review of Plans for Davenport Street Brick Reconstruction
E) Certificate of Appropriateness
1519 Muscatine Avenue — Dearborn Street Conservation District (basement egress window and
window well addition)
F) Report on Certificates issued by Chair and Staff
Certificate of No Material Effect — Chair and Staff review
1. 737 S. 7 h Avenue — Dearborn Street Conservation District (front step reconstruction and
storm door replacement)
2. 328 Brown Street — Brown Street Historic District (fence replacement)
Minor Review —Staff review
1. 629 Oakland Avenue — Longfellow Historic District (garage residing)
2. 1230 East Burlington Street— College Hill Conservation District (window replacement)
F) Discuss Historic Preservation work plan for 2017
G) Consideration of Minutes for February 9, 2017
H) Commission Information and Discussion
I) Adjournment
CITY OF IOWA CITY
1�IEMORAN UUM
DATE: February 27, 2017
TO: Historic Preservation Commission
FROM: Dsve Panos, City a lol;ra Cf:y Engineering/Pl?', Senior Civil -ngireer
RE: Davenpo"i Stree: Brick gecons rucCon — Clinton Street to Linn Street
Introduction:
This memo is intended to provide the Historic Preservation Commission with an update on
this upcoming City project which includes full street reconstruction of a select portion of
Davenport Street. A small portion of this project lies within the Gilbert -Linn City Historic
District. See attached Historic District map.
History/Backarourd:
Due to severe deterioration of the brick surface of Davenport Street, from Linn Street to
Clinton Street, the City included reconstruction of these two blocks of Davenport Street in
the 2016 Capital Improvement Plan. A request for proposals from engineering firms was
conducted in 2016 to complete the design of the project, which resulted in the City hiring
McClure Engineering from North Liberty to prepare plan documents for this reconstruction
project. McClure Engineering has now completed a preliminary layout and design for the
project. To gather input from neighborhood property owners within the two blocks, the City
held an open house and presentation at Horrace-Mann School gymnasium on February 22,
2017.
Prolect Discussion:
Exhibit A shows the anticipated project limits.
• The project generally includes reconstruction of Davenport Street from Clinton Street to
Linn Street. According to the City Historic District Map, a portion of the project near Linn
Street is within the Gilbert -Linn Historic District. The majority of the project is not in a
City designated Historic District.
Exhibit B shows the new roadway cross section, which will include the following project
elements:
Salvage and Reinstallation of existing brick pavers
7" concrete base
New drainage system under road including rock drainage layer, new storm sewer
intakes and piping, and new subdrain tile system
New 6'` concrete curb and gutter.
New curb ramps at Clinton/Davenport, Dubuque/Davenport, and Linn Street/Davenport
intersections to meet ADA compliance
• New 12" water main from Clinton to Dubuque to replace 1900-1920 water main
Project Timeframe:
The City is working toward completion of the construction plans to allow for an early Spring
2017 bid letting schedule and Summer 2017 to early Fall 2017 Construction completion period.
With the project at a preliminary stage of development, the final determination of project scope
and schedule will be based on the available project funding budget and final estimated project
costs.
DA EN -ORT BRICK{ STREET
RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT
OTYOF10181 CITY 4 (CLINTON STREET TO LINN STREET
� % rwa4 N 4rtxrt.
//J11na �y1 _ mr ��mmsa�
I
If®
McC L LI RE' KK''
EN0INEE9ING co, NGNiN
LEGEND
0
e�K�YwamclNx
L 1
wcw�ut�axcEvucnmE
y—
t
—n—
W41meWxYxwaEENEs
_ —N_
¢L1-1
BIORM6YM61M0.0VG1M18
nwrtw e4w®
EXHIBIT A
DAVENPORT BRICK STREET
mom RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT
(CLINTOM S T RE1=T TO UNIN STREET)
3T BRICK P.3VE?4iEMT TYPICAL SECTION
DAIMAPORT STREET
xmror•,•
CITY OF IOWA CITY
NOON
,-1;
IIh,
McCLURE`
ENGINEERING Cam.
EXHIBIT B
F 1,
.rXf:-r SPEEDWAY Northside Neighborhood
Historic and Conservation Districts
j. 0
CITY S, Fn
PAkK
BELLAVISTA
-N
0
PARK
Gilbert -'Linn
Historic
District r
Brown Street
Historic
District
5 rGoosetown/
Horace Mann
Conservation
District
- -C I H t Itl U 111tj I I I I ; " ) I )t B OOMINGTON
F
KF71 F',
DODGE I
STREET
PLEASANT
ELIZABETH
ROCHESTER
ELD EE?-Elm E
F]
R
(L
HOTZ
i6fferson Street
Q
[
cgi
L
Historic -District
�Ilmllmllmm
]
JEFFERSUNd
Lz_
z
W
z re
-z
9
z
Lu
z
IOWA
Z5
m 0
z O.
3
1
WASHINGTON
COLLEGE
BURLINGTON
COURT
Staff Report March 2, 2017
Historic Review for 1519 Muscatine Avenue
District: Dearborn Street Conservation District
Classification: Contributing
The applicant, Josh and Jessica Lem, is requesting approval for a proposed alteration project at 1519
Muscatine Avenue, a contributing property in the Dearborn Street Conservation District. The project consists
of adding a basement egress window and window well.
Applicable Regulations and Guidelines:
4.0 Iowa CityllfstorfcPreservation GuideLnesforAfterations
4.5 Foundations
4.13 Windows
StafComments
This single story gable roof house with projecting front gable is said to have been built by Moffitt and
Blakesly in 1928 (per the building permit). Stylistically it is not what is commonly known as a "Moffitt
cottage" because it is simpler in design. It does appear to retain all original architectural elements. The house
illustrates the style known as Minimal Traditional. The small garage was built before 1933 and the larger
garage was built in 1973.
The applicant is proposing to add a basement egress window to the front bedroom in the basement. The
window well will be poured concrete with a top course of block matching the block of the foundation. The
egress window will be a metal clad casement window with muntin bars to mimic a double hung window.
The guidelines recommend, in section 4.5 Foundation, that new window wells use materials that appear
similar to the existing foundation. Section 4.13 Windows, says that adding new windows into a primary
elevation is not allowed. The use of metal -clad solid wood windows is acceptable. Windows shall match
existing windows in the use of trim and divided lights.
In Staff's opinion, the proposed window well material of poured concrete with a top course of block to
match the foundation follows the guidelines. The proposed metal clad wood window is also acceptable
though the product information and divided light configuration should be submitted for approval.
The front elevation location of the egress window will require an exception to the guidelines. The bedroom is
in the front corner of the basement. The existing deck which is on the SE side elevation prevents the egress
window from being installed on the side elevation. Given the sharply angled position of the house on the lot,
the corner where the proposed window will be located is not clearly visible from Muscatine Avenue. The
house is also raised above street level and the window is in the basement which also makes it less visible. For
these reasons, staff finds that the exception for the location is warranted.
Recommended Motion
Move to approve a Certificate of Appropriateness for the project at 1519 Muscatine Avenue as presented in
the application with the exception that the new window may be located on the primary elevation due to the
m location and site situations with the fcIlowing conditions:
Window product information is submitted for staff approval
q's
Application for alterations to tl
properties located in a historic
pursuant to Iowa City Code So
the Historic Review process, ex
regulations can bq found in the
Preservation Handbook, which
Neighborhood
or online at: w,
TION FOR HISTORiC REVIEW
ustoric landmarks or
strict or conservation district
m 14-4C. Guidelines for
mation of the process and
wa City Historic
available in the
Services office at City Hall
For Staff Use:
Date submitted:
❑ Certificate of No ma al Effect
�l Certifac of Appropriateness
Major Revie
(((( ��(��11111 Intermediate Review
❑ Minor Review
The HPC does not review applications for compliance with building and zoning codes. W
comply with all appropriate codes and be reviewed by the building division prior to the is
a building permit. �.
Meeting Schedule: The HPC meets the second Thursday of each month. Applications are
office of Neighborhood and Development Services by noon on Wednesday three weeks pi
meeting. See last rage of this application for deadlines and meeting dates.
I PROPEn-4. OWNF R/ APPLiCANT ii-wo ' mAnoN
`j (Please check primary contact person)
❑ Property Owner Name: 1 t i 1, i - i t k 6—VA
Email: , *SS c.a (28rtn� Aov i . i :A/i-% Phone Number: :7.'-,7 7701—
n
City: rQw& r2lyState: � 4-
Phone Number:
City; ' r -; State: ®dip Code:[k:g
FROPOSEP PROJECT INFOlRtvfA"ON
Addressd Jrrl AMr,1&-,1)-,v le -
Use of Property: A{ Date Constructed (if known):
HISTORIC DESIGNATION
(Maps are located at the f6llowing link:
n This Property is a local historic landmark.
OR
This Property is within a historic or conservation district (choose location):
❑ Brown St, Historic District ❑ Northside i-Estorir District ❑ College Hill ConSerV
❑ College Green Historic District ❑ Summit St. Historic District Dearborn St. Consen
❑ East College St. Historic ristrict ❑ Woodlawn Historic District LJ Gcosetown/ Horace
❑ Jefferson St. Historic District ❑ Clark St. Conservation Conservation District
❑ Longfellow Historic District District ❑ Governor -Lucas St. C
District
Within the district, this Pro
erty is Classified as:
Contributing , ❑ Noncontributing ❑ Nonhfstonc
of
in the
to the
District
District
APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS
Choose appropriate project type. in order to ensure application can be processed, please it
listed materials. Applications without necessary materials may be rejected. j
Addition ypically projects entailing an addition to the building footprint such as a room, porch, deck, e
❑ Building Elevations ❑ Floor Plans ❑ Photographs
❑ Produc{t Information ❑ Site Plans
I
C- Alteration, (Typically projec&mtailing work such as siding and window replacement skylights, windov
alterations, deck or porch replacement/construction, baluster repair, or similar. If the project i
alteration, photographs and drawings to describe the scope of the project �re sufficient.)
❑ Building Elevations ❑ Product Information ❑ Photographs
Construction of a new bulldhlg
❑ Building Elevations ❑ Floor Plans ❑ Photographs
❑ Product t Information El Site Plans
Fj Demolition (Projects entailing the demolition of a primary structure or outbuilding,' or any portion of a 1
as porch, chimney, decorative trim, baluster, etc.)
❑ Photographs ❑ Evidence of deterioration ❑ Proposal of Future n
Regair or Restoration of an existing structure that will not change its appearance
❑ Photographs ❑ Product Information
❑ Other
Plea contact the Preservation Specialist at 356-5243 formaterials which need to be included with al
APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS
Project Description:
all
opening
a minor
such
rls !( 44 I�E�t' w1A6!6t✓ j4w erfc ise&, ocf e11..1 hers :5,
,4Wja�, U'-E reYm P r e/( w',A e' e jvi,) tJ -94. o'n�
/v c't ¢c1►d-'wts�uc�,�� ,, ;� dt ij,eta"
� � C�l� Gales'► '
1311A / ,,!( a c> crack Cb yrg lJ frL
rr
Materials to be Used:
CaiGitC�:f � ZSYGk/� /
p1+Itl I '04fk4 vt lit e� f'havG�i
Exterior Appearance Changes:
SUBMIT
1519 Muscatine Site Plan
North
new window locati
IN, -IIIIII
kiu
Ny
i IW
r
�_'.A CITY OF 101lVA CITY
ilp
MEMORANDUM
Date:
March 2, 2017
To:
Historic Preservation Commission
From:
Jessica Bristow, Historic Preservation Specialist
Re:
March 9 Annual Planning Session
Each year the Commission holds a planning session to review its progress in implementing the
goals and objectives of the Historic Preservation Plan, and to set objectives for the upcoming
year. This year, the planning session will be held during the regular March meeting. We hope to
identify what has been completed and what should be the priority projects for the coming year.
Please review the Goals and Objectives of the Historic Preservation Plan (pages 31 to 108). A pdf
of these pages is attached to the digital agenda.
Recent Achievements:
• Continued Education through local speakers, State Preservation Summit, and
partnership with Friends of Historic Preservation education initiatives
• Continued outreach through the Iowa City Historic Preservation Facebook Page
• Successful HRDP grant request for the City Park Cabin roof rehabilitation
• Successful Civil Rights grant request for National Register nominations, signage and
educational materials for the Tate Arms and Iowa Federation Home on Iowa Avenue.
Projects that are currently in progress include:
• Local Landmark designation process
• Civil Rights Grant Implementation
• Downtown District Survey Implementation
• HRDP Cabin Grant Implementation
• Manville Heights neighborhood meeting
• Historic Preservation Fund rollout for upcoming fiscal year
We anticipate these current projects as well as review of applications will require the majority of
staff time and/or Commission volunteer time over the next several months and recommend that
no significant projects be added to this year's work program.
MINUTES
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
FEBRUARY 9, 2017
EMMA J. HARVAT HALL
MEMBERS PRESENT: Thomas Agran, Esther Baker, Kevin Boyd, Zach Builta, Sharon
DeGraw, Cecile Kuenzli, Andrew Litton, Pam Michaud, Ginalie
Swaim, Frank Wagner
MEMBERS ABSENT: Gosia Clore
STAFF PRESENT: Jessica Bristow
OTHERS PRESENT: Beth Rapson
RECOMMENDATIONS TO COUNCIL: (become effective only after separate Council action)
CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Swaim called the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m.
PUBLIC DISCUSSION OF ANYTHING NOT ON THE AGENDA:
There was none.
CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS:
516 Fairchild Street.
Bristow said this property is right off the park in the Goosetown/Horace Mann Conservation
District. She said this has been a rental property with a variety of units for a long time, but now,
University Partnership has purchased it.
Bristow said there will be multiple items to consider in the future, but currently, there is a need to
get started on two specific projects. She said the owner proposes to remove all of the awnings
on all of the windows and an awning similar to a porch roof that is on the east side. Bristow said
it goes over a breezeway that connects the house to a garage, and she showed views of the
awnings, which are made of two by fours and corrugated metal.
Bristow stated that the other part of the application is the removal of the two chimneys. She
showed that from the front, the two chimneys cannot be seen at all, since they are on the back.
Bristow said it is possible that one of the chimneys was added at some point. She said that
from looking at it, this building, which could have been constructed as early as 1880, had a
crawl space. Bristow said the crawl space was dug out to be a basement. She said the
chimneys are not supported at all but basically rest on the rim joist that is the bottom of the two-
story wall. Bristow said they are supported on one side.
Bristow said the chimneys are not evident from the front and are not used. She said that
supporting them with masonry that they never had in the first place to go all the way down to the
basement with a footing just seems impractical.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
February 9, 2017
Page 2 of 7
Bristow said staff does not find that these chimneys are a very prominent architectural feature of
this house and feels that it is warranted for them to come down. Regarding the awnings, she
said they are completely non -original and never would have been allowed by the guidelines, so
staff finds it is very warranted to remove them.
Agran said he lives near this house, and the awnings are already gone. He said it looks much
better, and he supports everything in the application.
MOTION: Wagner moved to approve a certificate of appropriateness for the project at
516 Fairchild as presented in the application and staff report. Baker seconded the
motion. The motion carried on a vote of 10-0 (Clore absentl.
804 Ronalds Street
Bristow said this house is a little bit south of Happy Hollow Park and is in the Brown Street
Historic District. She showed the front of the house and stated that it is a typical four -square in
almost all ways.
Bristow said the application is for a window and door reconfiguration. She showed a door on
the east side that is significantly shorter than the other doors on the house and shorter than the
window heads and said that it will be completely removed. Bristow stated that the window to the
north of that door would be replaced with a window with a higher sill so that it would clear a
kitchen counter that would go on the interior. She said that there would still be a pair of
windows there.
Bristow said that further back toward the north there is a one-story addition. She said that the
Sanborn maps show that the house had an early single -story kitchen addition that was not the
full width. Bristow said that over time, it has been widened to the full width of the house.
Bristow showed a window on the north corner of the east side of the addition that would be
moved around the corner to the north face. She said that a new door would be placed in the
window's original location. Bristow said it would be tall enough to have the head height to work
out with the windows on the side of the house. She said there would then need to be a new
landing, and it would have a railing to match the guidelines with spindles and a top and bottom
rail.
Bristow said it would connect, because of proximity, to the deck. She said that currently the
deck does not have that kind of railing, but over time as the owner has time to work on the
property, it is likely that the railing would also match the guidelines, but it is not part of this
project.
Bristow stated that on the back, the north side, the feature that staff would want to see removed
the most is the dormer. She said that the dormer would not really fit the guidelines either,
because it was not designed to match the other dormers on the house. Bristow said that
originally, the window was going to be replaced and a skylight put in, but now the dormer is just
going to go away. She said that a skylight will be placed in the area of the new roofline when it
is put back on.
Bristow showed a view with a bathroom window that does not go up to the fascia board like all
of the other second -floor windows in the entire house. She said it will be replaced with one that
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
February 9, 2017
Page 3 of 7
would have slightly better proportions, because it could be longer, so it will have a head that will
go up to that fascia board.
Bristow showed the location for the window that moves around the corner. She said it is also
proposed to put a pair of windows, which would match the size, height, and proportion of the
window around the corner, next to the French door. Bristow said it is an option that the owner
might replace the French doors. She said they are shorter than the head height of all of the
other windows and doors, and if the owner can, he will replace them with a pair of French doors
that are taller.
Bristow showed a sketch demonstrating that the dormer is gone from the roofline, a skylight, a
window that is correctly located and better proportioned, and the French doors replaced with a
pair that would be the correct height. She said the sketch shows the window moved around the
corner and the new pair.
Bristow showed how it looks with the existing French door. She said again that it is not certain
at this point if the door will be replaced.
Bristow said staff finds that this would not change any of the historic openings in a way that
would diminish the historic character of this home. She added that in some cases it is being
greatly improved, for example by removing the dormer, changing the location of the bathroom
window on the second floor, and adding more windows to the back.
Bristow said that staff recommends approval of this application. She said that staff has the
window product information and other product information, and it will work with what is on the
house.
Michaud asked if the door going to the basement is being removed. Bristow replied that she
does not know if the door goes to the basement or the kitchen. Michaud asked if the door would
be added right around the corner from the French doors. Bristow said that is correct, but they
may be in separate rooms; she was not certain. She showed the location of the doors.
Rapson said that the existing door on the side is not original. She said that one goes in the door
and steps down and then steps up. Rapson said it is actually a hazard, and since there is
another way to get to the basement, that will be eliminated.
Rapson said that the windows in the kitchen are original. She said it is not on a side that faces
the street, and they would just like to shorten them. Rapson said that if one goes farther down
on the 1960s addition, where that window is, they would like to add an entry door to come into a
mud room sort of space. She said it is on the side that is closest to the driveway.
MOTION: DeGraw moved to approve a certificate of appropriateness for the project at
804 Ronalds Street as presented in the application and staff report. Agran seconded the
motion. The motion carried on a vote of 10-0 (Clore absentl.
1a:1li]0&KOW[y:10919197_\rmpg 6�Yn:11III :Y&GIMM _11:7_UUW9/_1a
Certificate of No Material Effect - Chair and Staff Review.
533 South Summit Street.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
February 9, 2017
Page 4 of 7
Bristow said this house has wood shingles and a couple of layers of asphalt shingles. She said
that critters were getting in between the shingles and the fascia board. Bristow said this project
involved installing a metal angle that would cover that gap all of the way around the roof. She
said that it will not be noticed, because it will be up at the roof edge and blend in with the fascia.
Minor Review - Staff Review.
818 North Linn Street.
Bristow said the Commission reviewed a project for the back of the house some time ago. She
said that now a deck has been added, with a railing matching the guidelines.
Intermediate Review- Chair and Staff Review.
1050 Woodlawn Avenue.
Bristow said this project from last year involved adding a deck along the slope along the side of
the house. She said that originally the owners were going to install a railing that matched the
portion of railing in the corner. The Commission approved this railing and project.
Bristow said staff really preferred that railing, but the owners can no longer find anything like
that. She said that staff worked with them, and they are still going with metal. Bristow said this
house is a mid-century modern kind of house, and the selected railing actually meets the
guidelines better than the railing they had.
CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES FOR JANUARY 12, 2017:
Swaim said that on the last page, second line, the full name of the organization, Iowa
Federation of Colored Women's Clubs Federation Home, should be inserted.
MOTION: Boyd moved to approve the minutes of the Historic Preservation Commission's
January 12, 2017 meeting, as amended. Baker seconded the motion. The motion carried on a
vote of 10-0 (Clore absent).
COMMISSION INFORMATION AND DISCUSSION:
CLG Annual Report.
Bristow said the Commission is a certified local government, so the State requires that an
annual report be submitted by the end of each February. She said that the Mayor will need to
sign the report.
Bristow referred to the annual report. She said that some of the highlights include the fact that
currently only the properties in historic districts, not conservation districts, are counted for the
work that was done. Bristow added that the number of properties has gone up every year, and
during the past year there were 28 properties that had something bigger than a certificate of no
material effect in terms of a project. She said there were many more such properties in
conservation districts.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
February 9, 2017
Page 5 of 7
Bristow said that the Commission also has a priority for education. She stated that information
was included in the report about the awards, the Facebook page, participation in the Henry Fisk
Reception, staff attending a talk in Cedar Rapids, and the Preservation Summit in Davenport.
Bristow also stated that the Commission successfully applied for a HRDP grant for the city park
cabins.
Bristow said that her time was increased from 15 hours to 20 hours on July 1 st. She said that
716 North Dubuque was put through as a local landmark, and the program of rehabilitation was
done in only one year, instead of three, and greatly improved and saved that property.
Bristow said the work of compiling local landmarks has also continued. She asked any member
who has anything to add to the report to submit it by next Thursday.
North Side Neighborhood Workshop.
Bristow said that a handout was distributed inviting the public to a kick-off meeting for the form -
based code investigation and how that interacts with the historic preservation codes. She said
staff would like to see some preservationists attend multiple parts of the meetings. Bristow said
the kickoff will be February 14 from 5:30 to 7:30 in Meeting Room A in the Library. She said
that most of this will impact North Side Neighborhoods.
Bristow said that the Commission and its members need to work through this to see if it is a
good thing or not. She added that a consultant has been hired to work on this.
Downtown Iowa City Surveys.
Bristow said that a CLG grant was applied for last fall to renew the downtown Iowa City surveys.
She said that the grant was not received.
Bristow said that another grant was applied for last week. She said that the City Council
strongly supports this work, so it has given the go-ahead to get started and hire a consultant to
do that work.
Bristow stated that the Historic Preservation Awards were very successful and went very well
She thanked all those who helped.
Michaud asked about the current status of the Unitarian Church at 10 South Gilbert Street.
Bristow responded that she does not know any more than has been in the newspaper.
Swaim said that the City Council work session had discussion of this last week. She said the
developer had worked with City staff to come up with figures for the proposal of the church
being saved and a building with parking ramps and drive-throughs for the fire station. Swaim
said the figures were higher than expected, so the City Council asked for revised plans. She
said the work session included discussion of the updated plans.
Swaim said the developer has been waiting for about a year for a decision. She said the City
Council agreed with Plan D, which removes the drive -through bays for the fire trucks as well as
some other changes. Swaim said the City Council said it will go ahead with this, so the church
is still safe right now, and the building is owned by Jesse Allen.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
February 9, 2017
Page 6 of 7
ADJOURNMENT:
The meeting was adjourned at 5:55 p.m.
Minutes submitted by Anne Schulte
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
ATTENDANCE RECORD
2016-2017
NAME
TERM
EXP,
2125
3112
4/14
5/12
6/9
7/14
8111
918
10/13
11/10
12/8
1/12
219
AGRAN, THOMAS
3/29/17
X
X
O/E
X
X
O/E
O/E
X
X
X
X
X
X
BAKER, ESTHER
3/29/18
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
O/E
X
X
X
BOYD, KEVIN
3/29/17
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
X
X
X
O/E
X
X
BUILTA, ZACH
3/29/19
---
---
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
O/E
X
CLORE, GOSIA
3/29/17
O/E
X
X
X
O/E
X
X
X
O/E
X
X
X
O/E
DEGRAW, SHARON
3/29/19
---
---
X
X
X
X
O/E
X
O/E
X
X
X
X
KUENZLI, CECILE
3/29/19
---
---
O/E
O/E
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
O/E
X
LITTON, ANDREW
3/29/17
X
X
X
O/E
O/E
X
O/E
X
X
O/E
O/E
X
X
MICHAUD, PAM
3/29/18
X
X
X
X
X
X
O/E
X
X
X
X
X
X
SANDELL, BEN
3/29/17
X
X
X
X
X
X
---
---
SWAIM, GINALIE
3/29/18
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
O/E
O/E
X
WAGNER, FRANK
3/29/18
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
O/E
X
X
X
X
KEY: X = Present
O = Absent
O/E = Absent/Excused
--- = Not a Member