HomeMy WebLinkAbout1980-09-09 Bd Comm minutesa
1.
3
MINUTES
IOWA CITY HOUSING APPEALS BOARD
July 10, 1980
MEMBERS PRESENT: Klaus, Haendel, Koenig, VanderZee, Graf
MEMBERS ABSENT: Karstens, Dennis
STAFF PRESENT: Steinbach, Flinn, Malone, Hoard, Scholten, Kuebler,
Vezina
Meeting was called to Order by Chairperson Klaus at 8:10 a.m.
Minutes of Meeting May 8, 1980
seconded by Haendel.. , were accepted 5/0 on motion by VanderZee,
BOARD TO CONSIDER THE CASE OF MR. JOHN PENICK, 811 E. COLLEGE:
Mr. Penick and staff members testifying were duly sworn by Chairperson Klaus.
Mr. Steinbach reported that on March 24, 1980 above premises were inspected,
that on April 9, 1980, Notice of Violation was served, and on April 16, 1980,
Appeal of Items 6, 8, 11, 12, and 13 was duly filed with City Clerk.
Appealed items were reviewed and discussed. It was moved by VanderZee, seconded
by Haendel, that Violations M6 E M8 be upheld with provision that, if Mr. Penick
runs into financial problems, that he appeal again. Approved 5/0.
Moved by VanderZee,•sedonded by•K6enig,:.that•.Itedis•11,.12,.13 riot be upheld.
Approved 5/0.
BOARD TO CONSIDER THE CASE OF MR. DON WILLIAMS 128 E. BLOOMINGTON:
Mr. Williams and Judy Hoard were duly sworn.
It was reported that on April 22, 1980, the above premises were inspected by
Hoard,
d, that o
April 30, 1980tan appeal was duly filedlwith theoCity nClerkwasissueFollowingndis-
cussion, it was moved by VanderZee, seconded by Haendel, that violation H1 be up-
held. Approved S/0. Moved by Koenig, seconded by Graf, that since safety of
other tenants not involved, that violation A2 not be upheld. Approved 4/1.
Moved by Klaus, second by Haendel, that violation 3 be:upheld, and if in-
stallation of mechanical vent is impossible, Mr. Williams may reappeal. Ap-
proved 5/0.
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICR+LAB
CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES
l!
i
Sa
t,
Z�
xJ
1
3
MINUTES
IOWA CITY HOUSING APPEALS BOARD
July 10, 1980
MEMBERS PRESENT: Klaus, Haendel, Koenig, VanderZee, Graf
MEMBERS ABSENT: Karstens, Dennis
STAFF PRESENT: Steinbach, Flinn, Malone, Hoard, Scholten, Kuebler,
Vezina
Meeting was called to Order by Chairperson Klaus at 8:10 a.m.
Minutes of Meeting May 8, 1980
seconded by Haendel.. , were accepted 5/0 on motion by VanderZee,
BOARD TO CONSIDER THE CASE OF MR. JOHN PENICK, 811 E. COLLEGE:
Mr. Penick and staff members testifying were duly sworn by Chairperson Klaus.
Mr. Steinbach reported that on March 24, 1980 above premises were inspected,
that on April 9, 1980, Notice of Violation was served, and on April 16, 1980,
Appeal of Items 6, 8, 11, 12, and 13 was duly filed with City Clerk.
Appealed items were reviewed and discussed. It was moved by VanderZee, seconded
by Haendel, that Violations M6 E M8 be upheld with provision that, if Mr. Penick
runs into financial problems, that he appeal again. Approved 5/0.
Moved by VanderZee,•sedonded by•K6enig,:.that•.Itedis•11,.12,.13 riot be upheld.
Approved 5/0.
BOARD TO CONSIDER THE CASE OF MR. DON WILLIAMS 128 E. BLOOMINGTON:
Mr. Williams and Judy Hoard were duly sworn.
It was reported that on April 22, 1980, the above premises were inspected by
Hoard,
d, that o
April 30, 1980tan appeal was duly filedlwith theoCity nClerkwasissueFollowingndis-
cussion, it was moved by VanderZee, seconded by Haendel, that violation H1 be up-
held. Approved S/0. Moved by Koenig, seconded by Graf, that since safety of
other tenants not involved, that violation A2 not be upheld. Approved 4/1.
Moved by Klaus, second by Haendel, that violation 3 be:upheld, and if in-
stallation of mechanical vent is impossible, Mr. Williams may reappeal. Ap-
proved 5/0.
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICR+LAB
CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES
l!
i
1
MINUTES HOUSING APPEALS BOARD
- 2
j 8:30 a.m. Recess
8:55 a.m. Reconvened
TO
109 S.
Brian Kuebler reported that on November 14, 1979, in response to tenant com-
plaint, premises were inspected for lack of required egress due to stairway
blockage by boxes and storage. North bedroom and kitchen lacked required
light switch. On November 26, 1979, Notice of Violation was served, and
on December 3, 1979, an appeal was filed with the City Clerk. Reference
was made to Mrs. Mathes' letters of May 10, 1980 to City Manager Neal Berlin
and Mayor John Balmer and May 20, 1980 to the Housing Appeals Board..Kuebler
advised that he had been verbally advised that the light switch had been in-
stalled, but that premises had not been reinspected. Moved by VanderZee,
seconded by Haendel, that violations be upheld. Approved 5/0.
Premises were inspected on three occasions to enable entry to all units (i.e.
April 12, 22, and 23, 1980). Notice of Violation was properly served on May 7,
1980, and Appeal was filed with City Clerk on May 12, 1980.
Hoard reviewed the four violations cited. Housing Inspector
Vander2ee moved, Koenig seconded, a
motion that Violation R1, lack of required minimum room size, not be upheld
since room contains a window and not that much smaller. Klaus indicated she
felt this would be a dangerous precedent, if we were to allow closets to be
used for bedrooms. Disapproved 2/3. Violation upheld. Item q21 lack of
required locking device, Moved by Haendel, seconded by Koenig, that violation
be upheld. Approved 5/0. Item 83, supplied facility not maintained in satis-
factory working condition, Moved by Haendel, seconded by Koenig, that violation
be upheld. Approved 5/0. Item q4, heating unit improperly located within
sleeping room, moved by VanderZee, seconded by Haendel, that violation be up-
held. approved 5/0.
-- vnoiuca ItlC3 CASE OF MS. SUE LIND, 124 E. BLOOMINGTON:
Ms. Lind and David Malone were duly sworn. Board was advised that premises
were inspected on May 12, 1980, and that a Notice of Violation citing lack of
required egress from basement was served by David Lee Malone on May 13, 1980.
Mr. Malone cited Chapter 17-4(n)(3) of the Code requiring windows of at least
12 square feet and indicated the window in question was less than the require-
ment. However, it was pointed out that the apartment contains 5 windows, all
of which pop out and are adequate for a person to get out. It was moved by
Haendel, seconded by Koenig, that violation not be upheld. Approved 5/0.
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICR+LA9
CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES
/636
i
MINUTES HOUSING APPEALS BOARD
M1
BOARD TO CONSIDER THE CASE OF MR. JAMES HAMMOND, 614 SOUTH CAPITOL:
Board advised that premises were inspected on May 16, 1980, by Brian Kuebler,
that Notice of Violation was served, and that on June 11, 1980, request for
appeal was duly filed with City Clerk requesting a variance on violation
k4. Kuebler advised that premises had been reinspected on June 24, 1980, and
that all other violations had been corrected and that the window in question in
44 does now open. Moved by VanderZee, seconded by Koenig, that violation not
be upheld. Approved 5/0. (Case heard in absence of Mr. Hammond with stipula-
tion that case would be reheard if Mr. Hammond appeared and so requested).
BOARD TO CONSIDER THE CASE OF MS. MAXINE LIPSIUS, 212 E. BLOOMINGTON:
Vezina reported that premises were inspected on May. 1, 1980, and that Notice
of Violation was duly served on May 9, 1980. On May 14, 1980, an Appeal of
Items q4 g N5 was duly filed with the City Clerk. It was noted that the apart-
ment has been maintained in same condition for over 40 years, and if doorway
were only slightly wider, refrigerator could be construed to be in kitchen.
Appliances are -well -laid -out. Moved by VanderZee, seconded by Haendel, that
violations 4 g 5 not be upheld. Approved 4/0.
Ms. Lipsius asked for confirmation of ruling to prevent similar citings in
the future and was advised by Senior Inspector Steinbach that a copy of the
decision would be mailed to her within the week and that file would be flagged
for future reference.
BOARD TO RECONSIDER THE CASE OF MARION R. NEELY FOR DEAN OAKES, 624. S. CAPITOL:
Reference made to inspection of premises on February 8, 1980, by Kelley J. Vezina,
and Notice of Violation issued on February 19; 1980, as well as Minutes of Iowa
City Housing Appeals Board Meeting of May 8, 1980. Board advised that two of
the bathrooms can and will be vented, but that the two inside bathrooms would be
extremely difficult and cost prohibitive to vent. Moved by Klaus, seconded by
Haendel, that violations 7 E 8 not be upheld. Approved 4/0. Moved by VanderZee,
seconded by Haendel, that all other violations be upheld. Approved 4/0.
A lengthy discussion ensued regarding required electrical switches. Moved by
VanderZee, seconded by Haendel, that all living room and bedroom requirements
for light switches be upheld. Approved 4/0.
Moved by Haendel that Hearing be adjourned.
Approved by: %?. (2'ew�'<'6Ze'V'
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICR+LA9
i
CEDAR RAPIDS - DES MOINES
r
i
MINUTES HOUSING APPEALS BOARD
M1
BOARD TO CONSIDER THE CASE OF MR. JAMES HAMMOND, 614 SOUTH CAPITOL:
Board advised that premises were inspected on May 16, 1980, by Brian Kuebler,
that Notice of Violation was served, and that on June 11, 1980, request for
appeal was duly filed with City Clerk requesting a variance on violation
k4. Kuebler advised that premises had been reinspected on June 24, 1980, and
that all other violations had been corrected and that the window in question in
44 does now open. Moved by VanderZee, seconded by Koenig, that violation not
be upheld. Approved 5/0. (Case heard in absence of Mr. Hammond with stipula-
tion that case would be reheard if Mr. Hammond appeared and so requested).
BOARD TO CONSIDER THE CASE OF MS. MAXINE LIPSIUS, 212 E. BLOOMINGTON:
Vezina reported that premises were inspected on May. 1, 1980, and that Notice
of Violation was duly served on May 9, 1980. On May 14, 1980, an Appeal of
Items q4 g N5 was duly filed with the City Clerk. It was noted that the apart-
ment has been maintained in same condition for over 40 years, and if doorway
were only slightly wider, refrigerator could be construed to be in kitchen.
Appliances are -well -laid -out. Moved by VanderZee, seconded by Haendel, that
violations 4 g 5 not be upheld. Approved 4/0.
Ms. Lipsius asked for confirmation of ruling to prevent similar citings in
the future and was advised by Senior Inspector Steinbach that a copy of the
decision would be mailed to her within the week and that file would be flagged
for future reference.
BOARD TO RECONSIDER THE CASE OF MARION R. NEELY FOR DEAN OAKES, 624. S. CAPITOL:
Reference made to inspection of premises on February 8, 1980, by Kelley J. Vezina,
and Notice of Violation issued on February 19; 1980, as well as Minutes of Iowa
City Housing Appeals Board Meeting of May 8, 1980. Board advised that two of
the bathrooms can and will be vented, but that the two inside bathrooms would be
extremely difficult and cost prohibitive to vent. Moved by Klaus, seconded by
Haendel, that violations 7 E 8 not be upheld. Approved 4/0. Moved by VanderZee,
seconded by Haendel, that all other violations be upheld. Approved 4/0.
A lengthy discussion ensued regarding required electrical switches. Moved by
VanderZee, seconded by Haendel, that all living room and bedroom requirements
for light switches be upheld. Approved 4/0.
Moved by Haendel that Hearing be adjourned.
Approved by: %?. (2'ew�'<'6Ze'V'
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICR+LA9
i
CEDAR RAPIDS - DES MOINES
MINUTES
IOWA CITY HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION
AUGUST 25, 1980
CITY MANAGER'S CONFERENCE ROOM
MEMBERS PRESENT: Costantino; Kuhn; Marcus; McCartt; McGuire; Penny;
Portman; Reyes; Yates.
MEMBERS ABSENT: None.
STAFF PRESENT: Helling; Mejia; Scholten.
GUESTS: Lisa Stratton, Daily Iowan; Shirley Jacobsen; Scipio
Thomas, Daily Iowan.
RECOMMENDATIONS TO CITY COUNCIL:
None.
RECOMMENDATIONS TO CITY MANAGER AND STAFF:
Letter to be sent to Artis Reis confirming the number of Commissioners
attending the local meeting on September 5, 1980 and advising her of the
issues Commissioners would like to discuss. McGuire to write letters to
Cablevision regarding public service program and local businesses
regarding brochures.
SUMMARY OF RELEVANT DISCUSSION:
1. Meeting called to order at 7:40 by Chairperson, Linda McGuire.
2. McCartt moved and Costantino seconded that the minutes of July 28,
1980 be approved as submitted. Motion passed unanimously.
3. By-laws revision. Committee is to meet to make recommended changes
and submit working draft to Commissioners prior to September
meeting.
4. Complaints pending.
a. E/S, 5-2-7905. Letters to be typed and mailed.
b. E/R, 7-10-7906 and E/R, 7-10-7907. Last appeal date 8-30-80.
C. E/R, 9-18-7909. Letter to be mailed 8-26-80.
f. PAR & C, 2-11-8001; PA/R & C, 2-12-8002; PA/R & C, 2-13-8003;
PA/R & C, 2-12-8004; PA/R & C, 2-22-8005. Administrative
closure.
g -o. Letters sent to all Complainants and Respondents explaining
that no action will be taken on their complaint until after the
Civil Rights Specialist is hired.
5. Cases closed. E/R, 12-22-7810. The conciliation agreement was
discussed in terms of the proper items to look for and include in a
settlement. A "Conciliation Agreement" file will be kept by the Civil
Rights Specialist as reference for the teams.
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICR+LAB
CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES
MINUTES
HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION
Page 2
6. Handicapped Accessibility in Willow Creek. Marcus reported that an
asphalt path will be constructed in the fall. It will lead from an
unloading zone (cut down in the curb) to the shelter in the park.
Marcus will advise the Commission when this is completed.
7. Services provided by local retailer. Penny spoke with the retailer
in regard to problems people had in cashing share drafts at the
business. A standard policy is being sought and Penny will follow up
to see if such policy has been implemented.
8. State closure on locally filed cases. Commissioners had questions
regarding the procedure followed in filing with the State and how the
Civil Rights Specialist is involved in this process on complaints
filed with the local Commission. This topic will be discussed with
Artis Reis at the local meeting on September 5, 1980 at the
Recreation Center.
9. Screening for Human Relations Director. A press release was distri-
buted which announced the appointment of Anne Carroll to the position
of Human Relations Director.
10. Screening for Civil Rights Specialist. The applications are in the
process of being screened and interviews will be scheduled when this
process is completed.
11. Support staff reclassification. The new job descriptions were
distributed and it was noted that Council would be voting on this
issue on August 26, 1980.
12. Affirmative Action Task Force. It is anticipated that a final rough
draft will be available on August 26, 1980. It appears that it will
consist of three sections: policy statement, implementation, and
assignment of duties.
13. Commission Training - State Program. This will be discussed with
Artis Reis at the local meeting on September 5. Portman, McCartt,
Costantino, McGuire, Kuhn and Helling will attend. Mejia is to
confirm this and advise Ms. Reis of the items Commissioners would
like to discuss with her. Legal is to determine the need for posting
an agenda.
14. Hawkeye Cablevision. Hawkeye is requesting information about the
Human Rights Commission for possible inclusion in a weekly community
interest program. McGuire is to send pertinent information,
bulletins, brochures, etc. and draft a letter from the Commission
granting permission to use the information provided.
15. Bus Posters. The backing has been put on the posters and they are
ready to distribute to the Iowa City Transit Company and Cambus.
16. Brochure Distribution. Letter to businesses to be written by
McGuire.
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICR+LA9
CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES
....._.......
MINUTES n
HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION
Page 3
17. Draft of .letter for speaking engagements. Deferred until next
meeting. Portman will write. Additional topics for speaking
engagements are: religious discrimination, Portman; small
businesses, Marcus.
18. Community Housing Board. Kuhn reported on the upcoming Housing
Conference scheduled for September 4 at 7:00 P.M. at the -Iowa
Memorial Union. Letters are being sent to community leaders inviting
their participation.
19. Costantino distributed copies of an article from the Press -Citizen
regarding the proposed City lay-offs. She then moved that this be
referred to the new Human Relations Director for her review and her
decision as to the relevancy of the article. Yates seconded the
motion. After a discussion both the motion and second were
withdrawn.
20. Next Commission meeting September 22, 1980, 7:30 P.M., City
Manager's Conference Room. Agenda items to Mejia by September 12.
McGuire reminded Commissioners they must contact her to be excused
from meetings.
21. Kuhn moved and Reyes seconded that the meeting adjourn at 9:10 P.M.
Passed unanimously.
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICR¢LAO
CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES
1437
ff ;
� I
j
MINUTES
RESOURCES CONSERVATION COMMISSION
JULY 29, 1980 -- 4:30 P.M.
CIVIC CENTER CONFERENCE ROOM
MEMBERS PRESENT: Fett, Hotka, Sanders, Singer.
MEMBERS ABSENT: Gormezano, Hamilton.
STAFF PRESENT: IinkIenberg.
RECOMMLNDAIIONS 10 IHE C11Y COUNCII.
The HCC recommended that I.he C i ty Council approve the Civic
Center HVAC system plans and specifications.
REQUEST TO THE CITY MANAGER
None.
SUMMARY OF DISCUSSION AND FORMAL ACTIONS TAKEN
Hotka called the meeting to order. The letter from Toni
Hamilton informing the Commission that she would be unable to
attend the next two meetings was noted.
Sanders moved, Fett seconded, to approve the minutes of the
,hrly Ib mee.Ling as read. Approved unanimously.
(:ivic Cent(!r• IIVAC
IloLka and Singer reported that At Black answered the
Commission's questions completely. The questions and answers
are:
1) Why do the plans call for lowering the ceiling in the lobby
as opposed to insulating, painting, and leaving exposed
the air ducts, and what is the cost difference between the
two alternatives?
"We have recommended a T -bar, lay -in ceiling covering the.
ductwork as a more attractive solution and one, easier, fora
contractor to cope with. We have estimated costs for Uri,,
work at about $1.50 per square foot or under $2,00(1 fur, Che
entire ceiling. This work would be straightforward and
easily understood by the contractor. the alternative of
exposed ductwork would require more. expensive mater inls
and a more difficult. installation; it woul(I nuL bu
considerer) standard by the contractor and would probably
be estimated at a higher- cos L."
2) What kind of performance is expected from the Lobby
airduct system given the length of the run with Lake -offs
and that there are five corners in that duct system? Ur,
I
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICR+LAB
CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES
I \
ff ;
� I
j
MINUTES
RESOURCES CONSERVATION COMMISSION
JULY 29, 1980 -- 4:30 P.M.
CIVIC CENTER CONFERENCE ROOM
MEMBERS PRESENT: Fett, Hotka, Sanders, Singer.
MEMBERS ABSENT: Gormezano, Hamilton.
STAFF PRESENT: IinkIenberg.
RECOMMLNDAIIONS 10 IHE C11Y COUNCII.
The HCC recommended that I.he C i ty Council approve the Civic
Center HVAC system plans and specifications.
REQUEST TO THE CITY MANAGER
None.
SUMMARY OF DISCUSSION AND FORMAL ACTIONS TAKEN
Hotka called the meeting to order. The letter from Toni
Hamilton informing the Commission that she would be unable to
attend the next two meetings was noted.
Sanders moved, Fett seconded, to approve the minutes of the
,hrly Ib mee.Ling as read. Approved unanimously.
(:ivic Cent(!r• IIVAC
IloLka and Singer reported that At Black answered the
Commission's questions completely. The questions and answers
are:
1) Why do the plans call for lowering the ceiling in the lobby
as opposed to insulating, painting, and leaving exposed
the air ducts, and what is the cost difference between the
two alternatives?
"We have recommended a T -bar, lay -in ceiling covering the.
ductwork as a more attractive solution and one, easier, fora
contractor to cope with. We have estimated costs for Uri,,
work at about $1.50 per square foot or under $2,00(1 fur, Che
entire ceiling. This work would be straightforward and
easily understood by the contractor. the alternative of
exposed ductwork would require more. expensive mater inls
and a more difficult. installation; it woul(I nuL bu
considerer) standard by the contractor and would probably
be estimated at a higher- cos L."
2) What kind of performance is expected from the Lobby
airduct system given the length of the run with Lake -offs
and that there are five corners in that duct system? Ur,
I
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICR+LAB
CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES
MINUTES 11�) _
RESOURCES CO,,,ERVATIdN COMMISSION
JULY 29, 1980
Page 2
would it be possible to straighten the duct out to
eliminaLe some corners in the branch duct?
"All elbows in the ductwork have been specified to have
turning vanes installed, which reduces pressure losses
substantially. The duct to the lobby has been designed to
have no more pressure drop than the other ducts in the
system."
3) The plans show ducts to about one out of three offices
compared to the present system of an airduct for each
office. Won't the planned system result in the offices
without airducts being stale and stuffy? (With the
present system the air gets stuffy when the door- to an
j office must be closed for some time.)
"The air ducts to all the offices are in place but are not
shown on the drawings. We have shown existing flexible
ductwork only up to flow control boxes but, so as not to
clutter the drawing with existing ductwork, we have not
shown the existing flexible ducts from the control boxes
to the air outlets in each room."
4) Why isn't there a Well-X-Trol expansion tank for each
boiler rather than just the one specified to handle both
boilers? With only one expansion tank connected betewen
the two, it will not be possible to fully isolate a "down"
boiler.
"Only one expansion tank is needed. A "down" boiler can be
isolated by valving it out of the system, with the
expansion tank remaining in the active part of the
System."
5) Why is no water feed system shown on the plans for the
boilers? This is of concern because the water feed system
for hot water boilers is different from that of a steam
boiler. In addition, the demolition plans call for the
removal of the water feed systems which the specifications
do not provide for their replacement.
"The schematic diagram at the boiler piping on page 1 of
the plans does show a connection for water feed labeled "to
city water". Thus, there is only one water feed for the
system, rather than one for each boiler as before."
Singer moved, Fett seconded, that the RCC approves of the Civic
Center HVAC system plans and specifications, that Al Black
answered all of the Commission's questions lolly :uul
satisfactorily, and that the RCC recommend that the City
Council approve the plans and specificaLions. Approved
unanimously.
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICR+LAB
,i
CEDAR RAPIDS DES MOINES
i
i
"I
F, ,
\1
MINUTES 11�) _
RESOURCES CO,,,ERVATIdN COMMISSION
JULY 29, 1980
Page 2
would it be possible to straighten the duct out to
eliminaLe some corners in the branch duct?
"All elbows in the ductwork have been specified to have
turning vanes installed, which reduces pressure losses
substantially. The duct to the lobby has been designed to
have no more pressure drop than the other ducts in the
system."
3) The plans show ducts to about one out of three offices
compared to the present system of an airduct for each
office. Won't the planned system result in the offices
without airducts being stale and stuffy? (With the
present system the air gets stuffy when the door- to an
j office must be closed for some time.)
"The air ducts to all the offices are in place but are not
shown on the drawings. We have shown existing flexible
ductwork only up to flow control boxes but, so as not to
clutter the drawing with existing ductwork, we have not
shown the existing flexible ducts from the control boxes
to the air outlets in each room."
4) Why isn't there a Well-X-Trol expansion tank for each
boiler rather than just the one specified to handle both
boilers? With only one expansion tank connected betewen
the two, it will not be possible to fully isolate a "down"
boiler.
"Only one expansion tank is needed. A "down" boiler can be
isolated by valving it out of the system, with the
expansion tank remaining in the active part of the
System."
5) Why is no water feed system shown on the plans for the
boilers? This is of concern because the water feed system
for hot water boilers is different from that of a steam
boiler. In addition, the demolition plans call for the
removal of the water feed systems which the specifications
do not provide for their replacement.
"The schematic diagram at the boiler piping on page 1 of
the plans does show a connection for water feed labeled "to
city water". Thus, there is only one water feed for the
system, rather than one for each boiler as before."
Singer moved, Fett seconded, that the RCC approves of the Civic
Center HVAC system plans and specifications, that Al Black
answered all of the Commission's questions lolly :uul
satisfactorily, and that the RCC recommend that the City
Council approve the plans and specificaLions. Approved
unanimously.
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICR+LAB
,i
CEDAR RAPIDS DES MOINES
• MI Nil I1,) ,
RLSOURCLS COIF _INAIION COMMISSION
JULY 29, 1980
Page 3
Energy Directory
The inclusion of various organizations was discussed; as well
as the potential distribution methods and points. The
Commission decided to send a letter to all of the organizations
being considered to obtain and review the materials they have
available to the public.
Zoning Policy Paper
Fett and HOW will review the proposed Zoning Ordinance.
Action was deferred for two meetings.
Gray Panthers Meeting Reuort
Sanders reported that he did not attend their meeting but talked
to the head of the Gray Panthers, Marge Strait. He found that
there will be a VISTA volunteer in the area soon. The
Commissioners felt it would be good to contact this person and
cooperate wherever possible.
Street Lighting
There was a short discussion of the street lighting experiment
and since no one knew definitely what was being planned, Sanders
offered to attend the City Council meeting to find out.
City Bus Transportation to Coralville Reservoir
Sanders asked that this item be dropped since he brought it up.
This should be researched prior to the next summer, however.
Other Business
the next meeting was set for• August 12. 1'etL reported that he
could not attend that meeting.
The meeting adjourned at 6:40 P.M.
Respectfully submitted, Roger Tinklenberg.
Michael Singer, Secretary
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICR+LAB
CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES
/638
m
I
I
w
f
• MI Nil I1,) ,
RLSOURCLS COIF _INAIION COMMISSION
JULY 29, 1980
Page 3
Energy Directory
The inclusion of various organizations was discussed; as well
as the potential distribution methods and points. The
Commission decided to send a letter to all of the organizations
being considered to obtain and review the materials they have
available to the public.
Zoning Policy Paper
Fett and HOW will review the proposed Zoning Ordinance.
Action was deferred for two meetings.
Gray Panthers Meeting Reuort
Sanders reported that he did not attend their meeting but talked
to the head of the Gray Panthers, Marge Strait. He found that
there will be a VISTA volunteer in the area soon. The
Commissioners felt it would be good to contact this person and
cooperate wherever possible.
Street Lighting
There was a short discussion of the street lighting experiment
and since no one knew definitely what was being planned, Sanders
offered to attend the City Council meeting to find out.
City Bus Transportation to Coralville Reservoir
Sanders asked that this item be dropped since he brought it up.
This should be researched prior to the next summer, however.
Other Business
the next meeting was set for• August 12. 1'etL reported that he
could not attend that meeting.
The meeting adjourned at 6:40 P.M.
Respectfully submitted, Roger Tinklenberg.
Michael Singer, Secretary
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICR+LAB
CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES
/638
m
I
I
I
MINUTES
BROADBAND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
TUESDAY, JULY 15, 1980 4:30 P.M.
CIVIC CENTER CONFERENCE ROOM
MEMBERS PRESENT: Eskin, Pepper, Terry.
MEMBERS ABSENT: Madsen, Washburn.
OTHERS PRESENT: Petrak from Press -Citizen; Stratton from Daily Iowan;
Blough, Yutkin, Kalergis and Daum from Hawkeye.
STAFF PRESENT: Shaffer.
RECOMMENDATIONS TO COUNCIL:
None.
MATTERS PENDING_ COMMISSION -COUNCIL DISPOSITION:
The Council's decision regarding Hawkeye's extension request is
still pending until Hawkeye reaches the 25% activation level
described in the ordinance, and approached the Council to resolve
this issue.
SUMMARY OF DISCUSSION AND FORMAL ACTION TAKEN:
Shaffer reported the Public Library and Civic Center are now hooked
up with cable cast capability. Shaffer also reported receiving a
$37,000 grant he wrote to the National Telecommunications
Information Adminsitration (NTIA) which will provide additional
video 'equipment for the accsss center. Shaffer has started City,
Library and public production workshops. Senate Bill 2827 proposes
to prohibit government access channels and possibly all access
channels. This bill all proposes to prohibit all city regulation of
cable television (and could be retroactive).
Hawkeye reports progress in cable system construction, with what
they believe is the completion of the 25% ordinance requirement.
Kalergis discussed the progress on the educational access channel
and on the formation of the Educational Consortium.
MEETING CALLED TO ORDER:
Meeting called to order at 4:40 P.M.
MINUTES:
Moved by Eskin, seconded by Terry, to approve minutes. Minutes
approved unanimously.
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICR+LA9
CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES
I
i
j
I
�1
i
I
MINUTES
BROADBAND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
TUESDAY, JULY 15, 1980 4:30 P.M.
CIVIC CENTER CONFERENCE ROOM
MEMBERS PRESENT: Eskin, Pepper, Terry.
MEMBERS ABSENT: Madsen, Washburn.
OTHERS PRESENT: Petrak from Press -Citizen; Stratton from Daily Iowan;
Blough, Yutkin, Kalergis and Daum from Hawkeye.
STAFF PRESENT: Shaffer.
RECOMMENDATIONS TO COUNCIL:
None.
MATTERS PENDING_ COMMISSION -COUNCIL DISPOSITION:
The Council's decision regarding Hawkeye's extension request is
still pending until Hawkeye reaches the 25% activation level
described in the ordinance, and approached the Council to resolve
this issue.
SUMMARY OF DISCUSSION AND FORMAL ACTION TAKEN:
Shaffer reported the Public Library and Civic Center are now hooked
up with cable cast capability. Shaffer also reported receiving a
$37,000 grant he wrote to the National Telecommunications
Information Adminsitration (NTIA) which will provide additional
video 'equipment for the accsss center. Shaffer has started City,
Library and public production workshops. Senate Bill 2827 proposes
to prohibit government access channels and possibly all access
channels. This bill all proposes to prohibit all city regulation of
cable television (and could be retroactive).
Hawkeye reports progress in cable system construction, with what
they believe is the completion of the 25% ordinance requirement.
Kalergis discussed the progress on the educational access channel
and on the formation of the Educational Consortium.
MEETING CALLED TO ORDER:
Meeting called to order at 4:40 P.M.
MINUTES:
Moved by Eskin, seconded by Terry, to approve minutes. Minutes
approved unanimously.
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICR+LA9
CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES
I
i
I
i
Broadband Telecommunications Commission
July 15, 1980
Page 2
s' ANNOUNCEMENTS:
Next BTC meeting will be August 26, 1980, 4:30 P.M. in the Law
Library in the bottom floor of the Civic Center.
j SPECIALIST'S REPORT:
$ Shaffer reported continued progress of cable construction with the
Public Library being hooked up for cable casting
i
and the Civic Center being hooked up for cable casting othrough othe
t character generator.
Shaffer reported the grant proposal he submitted (with sponsorship
by the Public Library and the City of Iowa City) in January, 1980 to
the National Telecommunciations Information Administration (NTIA)
has been accepted which means an additional $37,000 worth of
equipment for access cable TV purposes. The equipment will be housed
in the new public library.
The NFLCP (National Federation of Local Cable Programmers) national
convention took place in East Lansing, Michigan at the end of June.
It was attended by over 400 persons from access centers, independent
producers and cable industry representatives all over the country.
There will be a regional NFLCP meeting in Madison in October. See
Shaffer for more information. There has been some discussion on
having the next NFLCP national convention here in Iowa City in 1981.
Two large questions that loom in regard to this issue: 1) Where
would we get the necessary person power and money if it were to be
held in Iowa City? 2) Can Iowa City accommodate a 600 person
convention? Obviously this is a very large enterprise and it would
be crucial to its success to have accrued a large person power and
money resource pools.
Shaffer has started City staff production workshops, public
workshops and completed the first Library staff production workshop.
The BTC Annual Report has been drafted. Motion by Terry, seconded by
Eskin, to accept annual report. Annual report approved.
Senate
being
roduced
Bill
Communications oft
Commerce
Committee. Sections 248 and 509 include the following: Prohibition
of government access channels and potentially all access channels;
prohibition of government rate regulation of cable TV; leaving
cities, states and federal governments unable to regulate cable (it
is in effort to, in effect, deregulate the cable industry). The City
of Iowa City, along with the majority of the National League of
Cities members are sending letters to strongly protest this bill and
its provisions (especially Sections 238 and 509). We take particular
offense at there being no public hearings for this bill.
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICR+LA6
CEDAR RAPIDS , DES MOINES
1439
Broadband Telecommunications Commission
July 15, 1980
Page 3
HAWKEYE�ORT:
Blough reported Hawkeye as of July 10, 1980 had 128 miles of cable
stranded, 88 miles cabled, and 45 miles spliced. Phase I has been
activated, testing and accepted by Hawkeye.
Questions arose pertaining to the definition of the 25% activation
level. Hawkeye was unsure of the BTC's interpretation of the 25%
requirement. Pepper responded Hawkeye should send a letter to the
BTC identifying: 1) when Phase I (which is over 25%) was or is
technically completed (all stranding, cabling, splicing, testing and
proofing completed), and 2) when the full network service and/or when
what services are available to that first phase. Hawkeye believed
they had achieved these two accomplishments some two to three weeks
back and will send a letter with those dates to the BTC as soon as
possible.
Kalergis discussed status of the educational access channel and
efforts to form an educational consortium. Such a consortium is
being formed now. A question was posed pertaining who and/or what
should be able to participate on this channel. It was proposed one
measure might be being licensed by the state and/or each entity
should teach in a variety of subject areas.
NEW BUSINESS:
None,
ADJOURNMENT:
Moved by Terry, seconded by Eskin, to adjourn
Adjournment at 5:35 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
Will am D
rew Shaffer
Broadband Telecommunications Specialist
MICROFILMED BY
JORM M1r.R+LAB
CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES
Unanimously approved.
I
IOWA CITY AIRPORT COMMISSION
August 14, 1980
Iowa City Civic Center
Members Present: Redick, Sauegling, George
Members Absent: Dieterle, Phipps
Staff Present: Zehr
Others Present: Charles Neuzil, Rosemary Vitosh, Norvill Clemons, John
Redick, Wayne Overman, Ken Louder, Dick Blum,
Catherine Orne (KXIC)
Acting Chairman Redick opened the meeting at 7:45 p.m., in the absence of
Chairman Dieterle. Attendance and guests were noted. Consideration of the
minutes of the June 12th meeting was again deferred because there were still
not three members present who had attended that meeting. The minutes of
the July 10th meeting were considered and approved.
Manager Zehr presented the month's bills to the members and explained them
briefly. Mr. Sauegling moved to accept and approve the bills for payment;
second by Mr. George; the motion passed.
Mr. Zehr then asked for permission to rearrange the order of the items listed
on the agenda, and permission was given to consider item (d) first, followed
by (b), (c), and then (a),
In consideration of the budget, Zehr explained an existing disagreement between
the Finance Department, which shows a deficit of $6706.64 for FY '80, and the
manager, who believes the deficit should be zero. He asked those present to
consider memos of July 21st and 22nd in support of his position. Guest
Rosemary Vitosh explained her position that an amount of $15,000 for airport
tie downs had never been approved by the City Council, thus resulting in the
aforementioned deficit. It was decided Zehr would discuss the matter with
Neal Berlin, the City Manager, and seek to have the matter added to the
agenda of the next City Council meeting on August 26th.
Zehr presented preliminary drawings of the proposed corporate hangar building,
prepared by Wayne Overman. Mr. Overman explained the plans so far are
preliminary and must be defined. Zehr reported McCabe Equipment would be
willing to rent a portion of the building for $285 per month for five years.
Joe Tye has reported the University is leaning toward renting part of the
building rather than building their own, and will make their decision by the
end of August. Five people have signed up as wanting to rent T hangars.
Zehr said the power company has suggested a second power line be laid from
the road to the proposed hangar, with a transformer, thus providing a backup
source of power. Zehr supports this suggestion.
Moving to Item (c) of the agenda, Zehr reported the Riverfront Commission
has asked for permission to build several gazebos on the southern portion of
the Sturgis Ferry Park Boat Ramp area. He felt the buildings would not
Impact on the airport in any way. Commissioner Sauegling moved to approve
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICR+LAB
CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES
7�
A
m
r
j
-I
IOWA CITY AIRPORT COMMISSION
August 14, 1980
Iowa City Civic Center
Members Present: Redick, Sauegling, George
Members Absent: Dieterle, Phipps
Staff Present: Zehr
Others Present: Charles Neuzil, Rosemary Vitosh, Norvill Clemons, John
Redick, Wayne Overman, Ken Louder, Dick Blum,
Catherine Orne (KXIC)
Acting Chairman Redick opened the meeting at 7:45 p.m., in the absence of
Chairman Dieterle. Attendance and guests were noted. Consideration of the
minutes of the June 12th meeting was again deferred because there were still
not three members present who had attended that meeting. The minutes of
the July 10th meeting were considered and approved.
Manager Zehr presented the month's bills to the members and explained them
briefly. Mr. Sauegling moved to accept and approve the bills for payment;
second by Mr. George; the motion passed.
Mr. Zehr then asked for permission to rearrange the order of the items listed
on the agenda, and permission was given to consider item (d) first, followed
by (b), (c), and then (a),
In consideration of the budget, Zehr explained an existing disagreement between
the Finance Department, which shows a deficit of $6706.64 for FY '80, and the
manager, who believes the deficit should be zero. He asked those present to
consider memos of July 21st and 22nd in support of his position. Guest
Rosemary Vitosh explained her position that an amount of $15,000 for airport
tie downs had never been approved by the City Council, thus resulting in the
aforementioned deficit. It was decided Zehr would discuss the matter with
Neal Berlin, the City Manager, and seek to have the matter added to the
agenda of the next City Council meeting on August 26th.
Zehr presented preliminary drawings of the proposed corporate hangar building,
prepared by Wayne Overman. Mr. Overman explained the plans so far are
preliminary and must be defined. Zehr reported McCabe Equipment would be
willing to rent a portion of the building for $285 per month for five years.
Joe Tye has reported the University is leaning toward renting part of the
building rather than building their own, and will make their decision by the
end of August. Five people have signed up as wanting to rent T hangars.
Zehr said the power company has suggested a second power line be laid from
the road to the proposed hangar, with a transformer, thus providing a backup
source of power. Zehr supports this suggestion.
Moving to Item (c) of the agenda, Zehr reported the Riverfront Commission
has asked for permission to build several gazebos on the southern portion of
the Sturgis Ferry Park Boat Ramp area. He felt the buildings would not
Impact on the airport in any way. Commissioner Sauegling moved to approve
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICR+LAB
CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES
7�
A
m
i
i
IOWA CITY AIRPORT COMMISSION
August 14, 1980
Iowa City Civic Center
Members Present: Redick, Sauegling, George
Members Absent: Dieterle, Phipps
Staff Present: Zehr
Others Present: Charles Neuzil, Rosemary Vitosh, Norvill Clemons, John
Redick, Wayne Overman, Ken Louder, Dick Blum,
Catherine Orne (KXIC)
Acting Chairman Redick opened the meeting at 7:45 p.m., in the absence of
Chairman Dieterle. Attendance and guests were noted. Consideration of the
minutes of the June 12th meeting was again deferred because there were still
not three members present who had attended that meeting. The minutes of
the July 10th meeting were considered and approved.
Manager Zehr presented the month's bills to the members and explained them
briefly. Mr. Sauegling moved to accept and approve the bills for payment;
second by Mr. George; the motion passed.
Mr. Zehr then asked for permission to rearrange the order of the items listed
on the agenda, and permission was given to consider item (d) first, followed
by (b), (c), and then (a),
In consideration of the budget, Zehr explained an existing disagreement between
the Finance Department, which shows a deficit of $6706.64 for FY '80, and the
manager, who believes the deficit should be zero. He asked those present to
consider memos of July 21st and 22nd in support of his position. Guest
Rosemary Vitosh explained her position that an amount of $15,000 for airport
tie downs had never been approved by the City Council, thus resulting in the
aforementioned deficit. It was decided Zehr would discuss the matter with
Neal Berlin, the City Manager, and seek to have the matter added to the
agenda of the next City Council meeting on August 26th.
Zehr presented preliminary drawings of the proposed corporate hangar building,
prepared by Wayne Overman. Mr. Overman explained the plans so far are
preliminary and must be defined. Zehr reported McCabe Equipment would be
willing to rent a portion of the building for $285 per month for five years.
Joe Tye has reported the University is leaning toward renting part of the
building rather than building their own, and will make their decision by the
end of August. Five people have signed up as wanting to rent T hangars.
Zehr said the power company has suggested a second power line be laid from
the road to the proposed hangar, with a transformer, thus providing a backup
source of power. Zehr supports this suggestion.
Moving to Item (c) of the agenda, Zehr reported the Riverfront Commission
has asked for permission to build several gazebos on the southern portion of
the Sturgis Ferry Park Boat Ramp area. He felt the buildings would not
Impact on the airport in any way. Commissioner Sauegling moved to approve
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICR+LAB
CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES
7�
A
m
9
Iowa City Airport Commission
August 14, 1980
Page 2
the request with the provision that all plans and specifications for the
gazebos must meet with the approval of the Airport Commission. George
seconded the motion; all voted aye.
Zehr then introduced a problem with the Master Plan, citing a letter from
the FAA concerning the Malls light installation and the localizer on Runway 624.
The Old United Hanger is penetrating the 20 to 1 light lane approach pattern.
The FAA recommends all obstructions be removed. Several possibilities were
discussed, including lowering the roof and relocation of the building. Zehr
was asked to contact the FAA for permission to leave the building and mark
it with obstruction lighting.
Zehr reported a request from the Iowa DOT for a reconsideration of their
proposal to build a drainage ditch on airport property. The commissioners
decided to stay with their decision to deny the request, barring any new
information from the DOT.
Zehr asked for permission to attend a meeting of the National Association of
Airport Executives at the University of Oklahoma, September 2 - 5, 1980.
Permission was granted.
In response to questions from Redick, Zehr reported the refurbished office
space in the front of the Old United Hangar has been rented and is drawing
income. He also reported having received approval from the EPA for a
$10,000 grant to study noise abatement problems.
Dick Blum reminded the commissioners the Planning and Zoning Commission has
not received a response from the Airport Commission to their recommendations
regarding the airport overlay zone and the tall structure zone. The matter
will be placed on the agenda of the next Airport Commission meeting.
The meeting was adjourned at 9:05.
Recorder: Priscilla Wright
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICR+LAO
CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES
AO/
1
i
-i
d
Iowa City Airport Commission
August 14, 1980
Page 2
the request with the provision that all plans and specifications for the
gazebos must meet with the approval of the Airport Commission. George
seconded the motion; all voted aye.
Zehr then introduced a problem with the Master Plan, citing a letter from
the FAA concerning the Malls light installation and the localizer on Runway 624.
The Old United Hanger is penetrating the 20 to 1 light lane approach pattern.
The FAA recommends all obstructions be removed. Several possibilities were
discussed, including lowering the roof and relocation of the building. Zehr
was asked to contact the FAA for permission to leave the building and mark
it with obstruction lighting.
Zehr reported a request from the Iowa DOT for a reconsideration of their
proposal to build a drainage ditch on airport property. The commissioners
decided to stay with their decision to deny the request, barring any new
information from the DOT.
Zehr asked for permission to attend a meeting of the National Association of
Airport Executives at the University of Oklahoma, September 2 - 5, 1980.
Permission was granted.
In response to questions from Redick, Zehr reported the refurbished office
space in the front of the Old United Hangar has been rented and is drawing
income. He also reported having received approval from the EPA for a
$10,000 grant to study noise abatement problems.
Dick Blum reminded the commissioners the Planning and Zoning Commission has
not received a response from the Airport Commission to their recommendations
regarding the airport overlay zone and the tall structure zone. The matter
will be placed on the agenda of the next Airport Commission meeting.
The meeting was adjourned at 9:05.
Recorder: Priscilla Wright
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICR+LAO
CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES
AO/
MINUTES
IOWA CITY PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
AUGUST 7, 1980
MEMBERS PRESENT: Jakobsen, Kammermeyer, Lehman, Ogesen
MEMBERS ABSENT: Horton, Blum, Vetter
STAFF PRESENT: Boothroy, Schmeiser, Woito
SUMMARY OF DISCUSSION:
Chairperson Jakobsen called the meeting to order. There was no
Public discussion of items not included on the agenda.
Minutes of the July 17, 1980 meeting were approved with an amendment
to page 3, paragraph 4 deleting the term "collector" and in its place
using the term "arterial".
SUBDIVISION ITEMS:
S-8010. Public discussion of a final plat of Spring Valley
u�bdivision located two and one-half miles north of the City limits
on County Road W66. (old Highway 218) Response time: waived.
Boothroy explained that the item was again on the Commission's agenda
because the applicant intended to substantially change the final
plat that was previously considered. However, the plat had not yet
been filed with the City, therefore, the Commission should defer any
action at this time.
Further discussion; no action taken.
OTHER BUSINESS:
Discussion of the proposed new zoning ordinance.
A series of special meetings to review the new zoning ordinance were
discussed by the Commission. Special meetings were proposed for the
following times: August 25, 28; September 6 and 11. It was also
discussed by the Commission to set the new ordinance for a public
hearing at their first regular meeting in September for
September 25, 1980; no action taken.
Discussion of Edwin Barker's request to zone property on Emerald
Street from R3 to RX
Boothroy explained that the applicant was proposing two possible
approaches to rezoning the property in question. One proposal was to
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICR+LA6
CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES
101
i
i
C
MINUTES
IOWA CITY PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
AUGUST 7, 1980
MEMBERS PRESENT: Jakobsen, Kammermeyer, Lehman, Ogesen
MEMBERS ABSENT: Horton, Blum, Vetter
STAFF PRESENT: Boothroy, Schmeiser, Woito
SUMMARY OF DISCUSSION:
Chairperson Jakobsen called the meeting to order. There was no
Public discussion of items not included on the agenda.
Minutes of the July 17, 1980 meeting were approved with an amendment
to page 3, paragraph 4 deleting the term "collector" and in its place
using the term "arterial".
SUBDIVISION ITEMS:
S-8010. Public discussion of a final plat of Spring Valley
u�bdivision located two and one-half miles north of the City limits
on County Road W66. (old Highway 218) Response time: waived.
Boothroy explained that the item was again on the Commission's agenda
because the applicant intended to substantially change the final
plat that was previously considered. However, the plat had not yet
been filed with the City, therefore, the Commission should defer any
action at this time.
Further discussion; no action taken.
OTHER BUSINESS:
Discussion of the proposed new zoning ordinance.
A series of special meetings to review the new zoning ordinance were
discussed by the Commission. Special meetings were proposed for the
following times: August 25, 28; September 6 and 11. It was also
discussed by the Commission to set the new ordinance for a public
hearing at their first regular meeting in September for
September 25, 1980; no action taken.
Discussion of Edwin Barker's request to zone property on Emerald
Street from R3 to RX
Boothroy explained that the applicant was proposing two possible
approaches to rezoning the property in question. One proposal was to
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICR+LA6
CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES
101
i
MINUTES
PLANNING & ZG._.iG COMMISSION
AUGUST 7, 1980
Page 2
zone the entire existing apartment complex to R3A and the other to
rezone only a portion of the property in question to R3A. Upon
approval of either request, the applicant then intended to file an
amended LSRD plan and complete the 30th unit. Staff has reviewed the
overall density of the property in question and finds that under the
proposed new zoning ordinance and map that if the tract were zoned to
an RM -20 classification, it would be conforming and, as such,
Mr. Barker could complete the 30th unit upon approval of an amended
LSRD plan.
Mr. Barker indicated to the Commission he was agreeable to the
staff's proposal and inquired as to what the time schedule might be
for the adoption of the new zoning ordinance.
Commissioner Jakobsen indicated that the ordinance may not be
formally adopted until around the first part of next year.
After some discussion by the Commission regarding the staff's
proposal, it was the consensus of those members present that RM -20
would be an appropriate zoning of the Barker property. Further
discussion; no action taken.
Discussion of the Jack I. Young request to rezone property located
off Taft Speedway from R1A to R3A.
Boothroy indicated that this item would be placed on the Commission's
agenda for the next regular meeting. Information provided in the
packet was a thorough explanation of the history and legal
implications regarding the subject request. Planning will provide a
formal report and recommendation, to the Commission for their
consideration at their next regular meeting.
A discussion between Linda Woito and various Commissioners took
place regarding the content of her memo. Commissioner Kammermeyer
expressed objections to zoning the Young property to conforming. He
indicated that the primary reason for his objection was based on the
fact that R3A was contrary to the recommendations set forth by the
City's Comprehensive Plan. Further discussion; no action taken.
Next regular meeting -- August 21, 1
There being no further business the
Prepared b
Approved b;
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICR+LAB
CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES
/6y/
MINUTES
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
AUGUST 21, 1980
CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS
MEMBERS PRESENT: Lehman, Ogesen, Jakobsen, Kammermeyer, Horton,
i
Vetter, Blum
,.
MEMBERS ABSENT: None i
e
STAFF PRESENT: Wioto, Boothroy, Tyler
u
RECOMMENDATIONS TO COUNCIL
1. 5-8009. That the City Council recommend to the City of Coralvillle and
Johnson County the denial of the final plat of Spring Valley Subdivision
Part I located two and one-half miles north of the City limits on County
Road W66 (Old Highway 218); response time: waived.
2. C-8002. That the rezoning of Jack I. Young's property from R13 to R3A
commonly referred to at the Old Elk's Country Club be approved; Limitation
period: waived.
SUMMARY OF DISCUSSION
Chairperson Jakobsen called the meeting to order and asked if anyone present
wished to discuss any item not included on the agenda. No one responded.
.t
SUBDIVISION ITEM
5-8009. Public discussion of the final plat of Spring Valley Subdivision, Part
I, located two and one-half miles north of the City Limits on County Road W66
(Old Highway 218); Response time: waived.
i
Boothroy explained that several plats for this subdivision had been sub-
mitted. That this plat excluded the northwest corner of the tract and so
Part I. He out
k
should be referred to as Spring Valley Subdivision, pointed
final considered had been significantly different than I,
that the previous plat
the preliminary plat approved by Johnson County but denied by Iowa City
Planning and Zoning Commission . Controversy arose in the Johnson County
Planning and Zoning Commission over the differences in the plats resulting
the of the
in the consideration for denial. In order to secure approval
final plat, the developers reverted back to the original plat which the County
was bound legally to approval since preliminary approval had already been
granted.
City Staff recommended denial because of the deficiencies and discrepancies i
and the problem of secondary access. Staff felt that too many lots would
access onto Old Highway 218 which would create a dangerous situation. He
added that the previous final plat submitted had been improved in many ways and
that P & Z had recommended its approval.
I
i
i
MICROFILMED BY
C.
JORM MICR+LA13
j
CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISISON
I AUGUST 21, 1980
page 2
Members of the Commission pointed out that the developers had made attempts
to improve the plat and develop the access road but that the County's
stand virtually disallowed the road improvements. General feeling was that
the first final plat was superior to the one under consideration and that it
was unfortunate that the County could not approve the superior plat. Ralph
Stouffer, representing the owners of Spring Valley Subdivision, requested that
discrepancies 3, 4, and 6 be waived.
Blum moved that the Commission recommend that the City Council recommend
to the City of Coralville and Johnson County the approval of the final
plat of Spring Valley Subdivision located two and one-half miles north
of the City Limits on County Road W66 (Old Highway 218) waiving items 3,
4, and 6 with the understanding that all deficiencies and discrepancies
be attended to.
Kammermeyer seconded.
Blum called attention to the fact that the previous plat appeared better
and asked that, in the spirit of cooperation and concern for a better
living situation for the residents, that Coralville and Johnson County
look for a way to approve that plat. He asked that the Commission's
comments concerning the approval of that plat be included in the minutes.
asked attached)
that theyadded
were deniedthe
thedeveloper
ability tohad
improveall
thethat
roadobydbe
other's
actions.
The motion failed with Blum voting yes.
Jakobsen stated that she too appreciated the developer's work.
ZONING ITEM
C-8002. Public discussion of the rezoning of Jack I. Young's property
from R1A to R3A, located west of Taft's Speedway in an area commonly referred
to as the Old Elk's Country Club; Limitation period : waived.
Tom Gilman, representing Young, explained that the land had previously been
zoned to allow multi -family dwellings and that a building, properly permitted
by the city, had been started in 1964. Now Ydung wishes to finish construction.
This would require zoning to R3A.
Blum raised questions based on the strong neighborhood reaction during
the discussion of the Comprehensive Plan to zoning the area for multi-
family dwellings. He pointed out that this rezoning was contrary to the
Comprehensive Plan. Wioto responded that the Zoning Ordinance and the
Comprehensive Plan had not been in effect in 1964 and the Commission was
i being asked to recognize- the legal rights of 1964. Blum stated that the
1 Commission had to be very careful that the ruling could not be construed
to allow He asked ifnsigns tbuildingsion of
had beenpostedand stated in ohis �surprise that the one aneighborsdwere
not at the meeting to protest.
MICROFILMED BY
i JORM MICR+LAB
CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES
I
PLANNING
AND ZONING COMMISISON
AUGUST 21, 1980
page 3
rThe Chair movedIA that the City Council approve the rezonin 9 of Jack I. Young's
eferred tooasRthetOld3Elk'scated Countrest of Ta ft's Speedway in an area commonly
Y Club.
The
conflictowithrthedComprehensive nPlan. and Blum voting no because of concern about
OTHER BUSINESS
Boothroy pointed out a letter from American Sign and Indicator Com an
for an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance in order to allow the construction
of a monument sign in CBS zones. p Y asking
The Commission members stated that they were not
yet toaction because different signs were allowed in differentdzonescand �the zsuch
ones
themselves have not yet been established. They added that they did not want
to deal with the new sign ordinance in a piecemeal fashion.
NEW ZONING ORDINANCE
Blum brought up a letter from Tony Fry which expressed concerns about
proposed zoning of the northside in regard to duplexes. Members agreed that
his points; were valid and should be considered. Blum added that he had been
investigating duplexes which were presently in single family
that even though they were non -conforming, they appeared to be in
dition. zones and found
good con -
Dick Ziock expressed his concern with the proposed zoning of his property stating
that it had been divided into two zones,
etold not to asarlier this year when he presented an LSRD4Plandtosthe Commission he hadbeenthat the Commissionrhadebeenpertunaware ofotheftotal tsituation Previoouslysandeen-
iscus ed Ziock to attend the meeting Monday, August 26 where the issue will be
Ziock added that at present 32 units were allowed on the property and that with
the proposed new zoning ordinance, only 27 would be permitted, therefore a con-
forming property would become non -conforming which is against the Commission's
intent. Schmeiser explained that the proposed density was an average and that
a slightly higher density would still be considered conforming.
Jim Barfuss of the River City Housing Development expressed his concern for
zoning discrimination against unrelated adults living together. He stated that
he hoped to raise awareness about cooperative housing and suggested that the
Commission distinguish between coo
a desire for Barfuss and others topgive scriteriiaand rwhilch9the uCommission might
use to establish a legal definition and standards for coop housingembBarfussressed
stated that Ann Arbor had many coops and that he would investigate how the
city handled zoning.
_ lG fe/
MICROFILMED BY
.. JORM MICR+LAB
'a CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES
\`
I
PLANNING
AND ZONING COMMISISON
AUGUST 21, 1980
page 3
rThe Chair movedIA that the City Council approve the rezonin 9 of Jack I. Young's
eferred tooasRthetOld3Elk'scated Countrest of Ta ft's Speedway in an area commonly
Y Club.
The
conflictowithrthedComprehensive nPlan. and Blum voting no because of concern about
OTHER BUSINESS
Boothroy pointed out a letter from American Sign and Indicator Com an
for an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance in order to allow the construction
of a monument sign in CBS zones. p Y asking
The Commission members stated that they were not
yet toaction because different signs were allowed in differentdzonescand �the zsuch
ones
themselves have not yet been established. They added that they did not want
to deal with the new sign ordinance in a piecemeal fashion.
NEW ZONING ORDINANCE
Blum brought up a letter from Tony Fry which expressed concerns about
proposed zoning of the northside in regard to duplexes. Members agreed that
his points; were valid and should be considered. Blum added that he had been
investigating duplexes which were presently in single family
that even though they were non -conforming, they appeared to be in
dition. zones and found
good con -
Dick Ziock expressed his concern with the proposed zoning of his property stating
that it had been divided into two zones,
etold not to asarlier this year when he presented an LSRD4Plandtosthe Commission he hadbeenthat the Commissionrhadebeenpertunaware ofotheftotal tsituation Previoouslysandeen-
iscus ed Ziock to attend the meeting Monday, August 26 where the issue will be
Ziock added that at present 32 units were allowed on the property and that with
the proposed new zoning ordinance, only 27 would be permitted, therefore a con-
forming property would become non -conforming which is against the Commission's
intent. Schmeiser explained that the proposed density was an average and that
a slightly higher density would still be considered conforming.
Jim Barfuss of the River City Housing Development expressed his concern for
zoning discrimination against unrelated adults living together. He stated that
he hoped to raise awareness about cooperative housing and suggested that the
Commission distinguish between coo
a desire for Barfuss and others topgive scriteriiaand rwhilch9the uCommission might
use to establish a legal definition and standards for coop housingembBarfussressed
stated that Ann Arbor had many coops and that he would investigate how the
city handled zoning.
_ lG fe/
MICROFILMED BY
.. JORM MICR+LAB
'a CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES
PLANNING AND ZONING LOMMISISON
AUGUST 21, 1980
Page 4
Bruce Glasgow brought up several points for discussion.
1) Area should be zoned RM20 close to downtown so that high density areas
for students are allowed.
2) Two duplexes will be sold August 23, which are currently zoned R2 but
which,with.the new zoning, will become non -conforming unless people use
them as duplexes in the next two years. He suggested that the Commission
adjust the zoning line near the railroad.
3) There are many daycare centers currently located in single family areas.
He stated that many would be grandfathered in and no appropriate place
fon new facilities will be available.
CAPITOL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS DISCUSSIONS
Ogesen asked when the city meeting to discuss the capitol improvements -projects
would be. Schmeiser answered that the meetings were scheduled for next
Thursday, August 28 but that the agendas were not yet available. The meeting
is scheduled to last all day. Jakobsen asked that discussion of the pro-
jects be placed on the agenda for Monday's meeting.
Members pointed out that it was difficult to attend meetings in the day
especially since the agenda was not always adhered to. Ogesen suggested that
at least written comments could be sent and that Staff representatives could
be asked to relay the Commission's concerns.
Meeting adjourned.
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICR+LA9
CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES
Prepared by
Andrea Ier
Minute taker
Approved by
Rich rd B um
Secretary
14
i
/
u \
'
Y
PLANNING AND ZONING LOMMISISON
AUGUST 21, 1980
Page 4
Bruce Glasgow brought up several points for discussion.
1) Area should be zoned RM20 close to downtown so that high density areas
for students are allowed.
2) Two duplexes will be sold August 23, which are currently zoned R2 but
which,with.the new zoning, will become non -conforming unless people use
them as duplexes in the next two years. He suggested that the Commission
adjust the zoning line near the railroad.
3) There are many daycare centers currently located in single family areas.
He stated that many would be grandfathered in and no appropriate place
fon new facilities will be available.
CAPITOL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS DISCUSSIONS
Ogesen asked when the city meeting to discuss the capitol improvements -projects
would be. Schmeiser answered that the meetings were scheduled for next
Thursday, August 28 but that the agendas were not yet available. The meeting
is scheduled to last all day. Jakobsen asked that discussion of the pro-
jects be placed on the agenda for Monday's meeting.
Members pointed out that it was difficult to attend meetings in the day
especially since the agenda was not always adhered to. Ogesen suggested that
at least written comments could be sent and that Staff representatives could
be asked to relay the Commission's concerns.
Meeting adjourned.
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICR+LA9
CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES
Prepared by
Andrea Ier
Minute taker
Approved by
Rich rd B um
Secretary
14
i
W
MINUTES
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
JULY 17, 1980
CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS
MEMBERS PRESENT: Vetter, Kammermeyer, Jakobsen, Blum
MEMBERS ABSENT: Ogesen, Lehman, Horton
STAFF PRESENT: Schmeiser, Keller, Boothroy, Scholten, Tyler
RECOMMENDATIONS TO COUNCIL:
5-8010. The Commission recommends the approval of a final plat
OT_Sp ng Valley Subdivision located two and one-half mile north
of the City limits on County Road W66 (Old Highway 218) with the
understanding that the deficiencies listed in the Staff Report be
addressed except for #8 which should be waived. ;Futhermore, the
Commission strongly urges the consideration of providing a second-
ary access road to the east as the subdivision is considerably
weakened by the lack of secondary access but provision of such is
beyond the capabilities of the developer.
I
i
- j
i
:
`
r
W
MINUTES
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
JULY 17, 1980
CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS
MEMBERS PRESENT: Vetter, Kammermeyer, Jakobsen, Blum
MEMBERS ABSENT: Ogesen, Lehman, Horton
STAFF PRESENT: Schmeiser, Keller, Boothroy, Scholten, Tyler
RECOMMENDATIONS TO COUNCIL:
5-8010. The Commission recommends the approval of a final plat
OT_Sp ng Valley Subdivision located two and one-half mile north
of the City limits on County Road W66 (Old Highway 218) with the
understanding that the deficiencies listed in the Staff Report be
addressed except for #8 which should be waived. ;Futhermore, the
Commission strongly urges the consideration of providing a second-
ary access road to the east as the subdivision is considerably
weakened by the lack of secondary access but provision of such is
beyond the capabilities of the developer.
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICR+LAB
CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES c;.
I
i
- j
i
I 1'
1.
11
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICR+LAB
CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES c;.
Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes
July 17, 1980
page 2
Vetter seconded.
The motion failed 0-4.
5-8010. Public discussion of a final plat of Spring Valley Subdivision
located two and one-half miles north of the City limits on County Road
W66 (Old Highway 218); response time: 7/29/80.
F Pat Keller, who prepared the Staff Report, explained that the subdivision
is outside the City's jurisdiction but in light of the agreement with
Coralville, the Commission was asked to give its recommendation on the
subdivision. The subdivision covers 96 acres with 62 single family lots.
The Commission recommended denial of the preliminary plat. The final
plat contains several differences including designation of a secondary
access road, three additional easements for future access, and reduction
of the number of lots from 74 to 62.
The Staff recommends denial primarily because of the lack of a developed
secondary access, as well as the excessive number of technical discrepancies
listed.
Ralph Stouffer, representing Spring Valley, requested a waiver of the
lot line intersection requirements as they were laying out the lots
so that the lines followed the contours of the ground. He assured the
Commission that all other technical discrepancies would be taken care
of. He added that the developers were attempting to negotiate some
kind of secondary access but were having problems with surrounding
property owners. The presently designated secondary access is a gravel
road owned by the County. The County is opposed to developing the road
at this time because of possible liability. The County is not maintaining
the road at this time.
Discussion followed between members of the public and the Commission
about the necessity of providing secondary access. Members pointed out ..
that recent policy has been to deny subdivisions which do not have
secondary access.
Blum moved that the Commission recommend to the Council to relay to the
City of Coralville and Johnson County the approval of a final plat of
Spring Valley Subdivision located two and one-half miles north of the
City limits on County Road W66 (Old Highway 218) with the understanding
that the deficiencies listed in the Staff Report be addressed except for
p8 which should be waived. Futhermore, the Commission strongly urges the
consideration of providing a secondary access road to the east as the
subdivision is considerably weakened by the lack of secondary access but
provision of such is beyond the capabilities of the developer.
Kammermeyer seconded.
The motion carried 3 - 1 with Jakobsen dissenting in order to emphasize the
need for secondary access.
MICROFILMEMOINES
JORM MI
CEDAR RAPIDS •
•
,fir
I
/`.
r
Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes
July 17, 1980
page 2
Vetter seconded.
The motion failed 0-4.
5-8010. Public discussion of a final plat of Spring Valley Subdivision
located two and one-half miles north of the City limits on County Road
W66 (Old Highway 218); response time: 7/29/80.
F Pat Keller, who prepared the Staff Report, explained that the subdivision
is outside the City's jurisdiction but in light of the agreement with
Coralville, the Commission was asked to give its recommendation on the
subdivision. The subdivision covers 96 acres with 62 single family lots.
The Commission recommended denial of the preliminary plat. The final
plat contains several differences including designation of a secondary
access road, three additional easements for future access, and reduction
of the number of lots from 74 to 62.
The Staff recommends denial primarily because of the lack of a developed
secondary access, as well as the excessive number of technical discrepancies
listed.
Ralph Stouffer, representing Spring Valley, requested a waiver of the
lot line intersection requirements as they were laying out the lots
so that the lines followed the contours of the ground. He assured the
Commission that all other technical discrepancies would be taken care
of. He added that the developers were attempting to negotiate some
kind of secondary access but were having problems with surrounding
property owners. The presently designated secondary access is a gravel
road owned by the County. The County is opposed to developing the road
at this time because of possible liability. The County is not maintaining
the road at this time.
Discussion followed between members of the public and the Commission
about the necessity of providing secondary access. Members pointed out ..
that recent policy has been to deny subdivisions which do not have
secondary access.
Blum moved that the Commission recommend to the Council to relay to the
City of Coralville and Johnson County the approval of a final plat of
Spring Valley Subdivision located two and one-half miles north of the
City limits on County Road W66 (Old Highway 218) with the understanding
that the deficiencies listed in the Staff Report be addressed except for
p8 which should be waived. Futhermore, the Commission strongly urges the
consideration of providing a secondary access road to the east as the
subdivision is considerably weakened by the lack of secondary access but
provision of such is beyond the capabilities of the developer.
Kammermeyer seconded.
The motion carried 3 - 1 with Jakobsen dissenting in order to emphasize the
need for secondary access.
MICROFILMEMOINES
JORM MI
CEDAR RAPIDS •
MINUTES
SENIOR CENTER COMMISSION
RECREATION CENTER, ROOM A
AUGUST 7, 1980 3:00 P.M.
PRESENT: L. Carlton, M. Kattchee, W. Summerwill, M. Clover, J. Williams.
I ABSENT: G. Scott, B. Ambrisco.
STAFF: Benz, Meisel.
GUESTS: None.
Summerwill moved and Williams seconded a motion to approve the minutes
with the following changes: Under "cable television" section, the third
sentence should read, "Each studio will have extensive video equipment
available." The last sentence should be changed— to jive programming".
Unanimously approved.
OPEN DISCUSSION
Carlton asked whether Commissioners have received comments or inquiries
from the public regarding the status of the Senior Center. Summerwill
I responded that he had been asked whether the Senior Center was involved in
sponsoring some recent recreational activities in the community. Meisel
stated the Senior Center is not involved with these activities, but that
at the time the center beomes operational, staff can assist in
coordinating and disseminating information concerning recreational
activities, probably in the form of a calendar of events. Summerwill
emphasized that the Senior Center needs to be a leader in organizing and
coordinating services of interest to the elderly. Williams and Kattchee
commented that the Senior Center can assume this leadership role by
working in a cooperative and supportive fashion with service providers and
senior citizen organizations which will utilize the Senior Center. The
coordination of services and acting as a service clearinghouse will be the
primary functions. Meisel stated that staff plans to begin organizing a
council of service providers in September in order to initiate a regular
channel of communication with agencies and organizations participating in
the Senior Center. Carlton asked whether the Senior Center can begin some
services now. Benz and Meisel stated that they would not be in favor of
this idea for two reasons: 1) Lack of staff time; most of staff's time is
still needed for planning at this point; and 2) the potential for
confusion in the community which could result by providing only a few
services while not being able to provide a site for a full range of
services and activities as the Senior Center will when it is operational.
i
Meisel distributed two articles published in city and.state-wide journals
which detailed the development and function of the Senior Center.
SENIOR CENTER PROGRESS REPORT
The City Manager has asked Ecumenical Housing Corporation what the status
of their project is. Some Senior Center construction is being delayed
f'
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICR+LAB
CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES
Senior Center Commission
August 7, 1980
Page 2
because work in the area which will abut the housing cannot proceed until
it is known if the housing will be built. For example, the, construction
dealing with steps in the rear, the loading dock, and connecting doorways
currently assume development of the housing. If the Senior Center
proceeds with construction assumming that the housing will be built and it
is not, increased costs could result due to changes that will need to be
made later. HUD is requiring Ecumenical Housing to rebid the project
which is causing the delay. Berlin has asked Ecumenical Housing to state
their plans within two weeks.
The elevator shaft, duct work, and stairways have been installed.
Construction materials and supplies are arriving, and new walls are being
framed in. The anticipated completion date is still July, 1981.
BYLAWS
The staff asked Commission members to review a copy of the bylaws, and
verify that they are in the final form. The bylaws were reviewed and
accepted as being the final form adopted by the Commission on June 20,
1979.
OPERATIONAL HANDBOOK - VOLUNTEERS
Benz stated that the next section of the handbook that she would like the
handbook committee to address concerns volunteers. Two general
references relating to volunteers' written job description and training
and supervision are included in the administration and personnel section.
The volunteer section will be more detailed and complete. Benz requested
general comments from Commission members regarding their concepts of
volunteer functions and activities at the Senior Center.
Commission members felt that volunteers would be drawn from users of the
Senior Center. This in turn would tend to strengthen the program.
Volunteers need to know what specific activities are available to them,
and should be able to expect a growth -producing experience. Volunteers
could be used by agencies and organizations participating in the Senior
Center on a planned basis for specific functions. Individuals wishing to
be volunteers of the Senior Center should receive general supervision and
guidance from Senior Center staff even if they are "assigned" to agencies.
Ongoing communication with agencies utilizing these volunteers will be
important.
The meeting was adjourned at 4:45 P.M.
Prepared by Lori Benz, Senior Center Program Specialist
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICR+LAB
CEDAR RAPIDS - DES MOINES
I
Senior Center Commission
August 7, 1980
Page 2
because work in the area which will abut the housing cannot proceed until
it is known if the housing will be built. For example, the, construction
dealing with steps in the rear, the loading dock, and connecting doorways
currently assume development of the housing. If the Senior Center
proceeds with construction assumming that the housing will be built and it
is not, increased costs could result due to changes that will need to be
made later. HUD is requiring Ecumenical Housing to rebid the project
which is causing the delay. Berlin has asked Ecumenical Housing to state
their plans within two weeks.
The elevator shaft, duct work, and stairways have been installed.
Construction materials and supplies are arriving, and new walls are being
framed in. The anticipated completion date is still July, 1981.
BYLAWS
The staff asked Commission members to review a copy of the bylaws, and
verify that they are in the final form. The bylaws were reviewed and
accepted as being the final form adopted by the Commission on June 20,
1979.
OPERATIONAL HANDBOOK - VOLUNTEERS
Benz stated that the next section of the handbook that she would like the
handbook committee to address concerns volunteers. Two general
references relating to volunteers' written job description and training
and supervision are included in the administration and personnel section.
The volunteer section will be more detailed and complete. Benz requested
general comments from Commission members regarding their concepts of
volunteer functions and activities at the Senior Center.
Commission members felt that volunteers would be drawn from users of the
Senior Center. This in turn would tend to strengthen the program.
Volunteers need to know what specific activities are available to them,
and should be able to expect a growth -producing experience. Volunteers
could be used by agencies and organizations participating in the Senior
Center on a planned basis for specific functions. Individuals wishing to
be volunteers of the Senior Center should receive general supervision and
guidance from Senior Center staff even if they are "assigned" to agencies.
Ongoing communication with agencies utilizing these volunteers will be
important.
The meeting was adjourned at 4:45 P.M.
Prepared by Lori Benz, Senior Center Program Specialist
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICR+LAB
CEDAR RAPIDS - DES MOINES
N
MINUTES
COMMITTEE ON COMMUNITY NEEDS
AUGUST 6, 1980
RECREATION CENTER, ROOM A
MEMBERS PRESENT: Bonney, Draper, Haldeman, Hall, Pecina
MEMBERS ABSENT: Barker, Johnson, Jones, McCormick, Montgomery, VanderZee
STAFF PRESENT: Barnes, Hencin, Keller, Knight, Tinklenberg
GUESTS: Linda Aitken
Since a quorum was not present, no official business took place.
OPEN DISCUSSION
Pecina noted that he had received many complaints from residents along
Rundell and Dearborn about the sidewalks being put in by the City. Hencin
asked that people having problems with the work contact him and he would
relay this to the sidewalk inspector. Some problems have already been
taken care of in this manner.
Draper stated that he had received favorable comments from several
handicapped persons in his work about what the City and CCN had done
to put in curb ramps and new sidewalks.
REVIEW OF APPLICATION FOR 3rd YEAR OF LOWER RALSTON CREEK PROJECT
Knight reviewed what activities were involved in the first and second years
of the project. He explained what was proposed in the 3rd year (outlined
in grant application). He also stated that the 3rd year would begin
January 1, 1981 under the Metro Entitlement category because of Iowa City's
SMSA status.
Draper questioned the legal status of the Rock Island tracks at Lafeyette
Street which are scheduled for replacement. Knight explained that because
of the Rock Island's bankruptcy status, the City might not be able to do
anything to those tracks on the bridge for many years.
There followed a general discussion about the progress of other scheduled
improvements and needed improvements for Ralston Creek.
GRANTEE PERFORMANCE REPORT
Keller introduced the 5th year cumulative Grantee Performance Report and
explained that its purpose was to assess the City's progress on the CDBG
program. He briefly covered sections of the report regarding project status,
expenditures, benefit to minorities and low and moderate income persons,
housing assistance, and equal opportunity.
Hencin stated that the report had to be submitted to HUD at the end of August,
MICROFILMED BY
DORM MICR�LAB
CEDAR RAPIDS DES MOINES
MINUTES
COMMITTEE ON COMMUNITY NEEDS
AUGUST 6, 1980
page 2
but if the Committee had questions they could be brought up at the next
meeting. Haldeman asked for clarification about "unobligated" funds listed
in the report.
USE OF REMAINING FUNDS FROM HOTEL SITE - REHABILITATION
i-
Hencin explained that there was a need to allocate additional monies for
housing rehabilitation, based on recent HUD correspondence. Barnes discussed
the topi:d, as presented in her memorandum (attached) to the Committee,
and stated that a demand still exists for rehabilitation funds.
Hencin stated that the staff recommended to CCN that the funds remaining
j from the sale of the hotel site, after the allocation for underground
utilities downtown, be allocated for housing rehabilitation. The Committee
was in favor of this recommendation, although no formal action could be taken.
SOLAR DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM
Tinklenberg presented his request to carryover $9,400 from FY80 to complete
this project. He stated that two families had been se from
to participate
and that bids had been opened today (8-6-80) to do the actual improvements l
(a greenhouse and a solar water heater).
Bonney asked why this project was being done. Tinklenberg replied that it
was to promote solar usage and to aid two low-income families to save fuel.
Pecina asked
"disappointiing"rhis that itsshouldtof havethe beenncarriedoout faster;
he would like to have seen more citizen involvement.
Tinklenberg stated that neighborhood seminars would be bbld as part of the
solar demonstration project, and he hoped that interested people would
come to see the results. Haldeman expressed his feelings that the City
should have the capability to assist the public and provide information on
solar access, when building or remodeling. Other members expressed their
concern that the energy conservation program should have had a broader
impact than just the two houses for the demonstration project.
The Committee members present felt that the budget carryover was justified
in order to complete the solar demonstration project. Pecina, however,
was opposed to it.
Meeting adjourned at 2:00 pm.
Prepared�
1 /i enc`jn
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICR+LAB
CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES
City of Iowa Cid
MEMORANDV
M
Oate: July 30, 1980
r
To: Committee on Community Needs
From:
Pam Barnes, Housing Rehabilitation Officer
Re: Housing Rehabilitation Program
COB�AB.
From February 1980 to June a total of seven cases have been processed under
the Forgivable Loan Program. Comprehensive rehab was
provided for these
seven with a cost of $74,872.56. Within the last two months I have received
about one call a week requesting help with housing repair. Unfortunately, 1
have had to turn them away because of lack of money.
312 REHAB
because I did mail could in a package for a single family 312 loan. This was returned
account ofObudgetarytaccept cuts. Currently discretionary 312 loan applications on
312 loan. y, I have seven people on my 11at for a
Almo
ted
With
s16c paretmen s. Loan reservation Rehais the Summit Awas fort;140,5is w5 Is a
should
should be within 45 days. 50 OO
We have recently received approval for a multi 312 loan application. The
reservation wasifor ;500 ns 32 000. o nts 6 is about 90>r elderly occupied. Loan
tp3/1
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICR+LAB
CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES
/0 �s
a
1
City of Iowa Cid
MEMORANDV
M
Oate: July 30, 1980
r
To: Committee on Community Needs
From:
Pam Barnes, Housing Rehabilitation Officer
Re: Housing Rehabilitation Program
COB�AB.
From February 1980 to June a total of seven cases have been processed under
the Forgivable Loan Program. Comprehensive rehab was
provided for these
seven with a cost of $74,872.56. Within the last two months I have received
about one call a week requesting help with housing repair. Unfortunately, 1
have had to turn them away because of lack of money.
312 REHAB
because I did mail could in a package for a single family 312 loan. This was returned
account ofObudgetarytaccept cuts. Currently discretionary 312 loan applications on
312 loan. y, I have seven people on my 11at for a
Almo
ted
With
s16c paretmen s. Loan reservation Rehais the Summit Awas fort;140,5is w5 Is a
should
should be within 45 days. 50 OO
We have recently received approval for a multi 312 loan application. The
reservation wasifor ;500 ns 32 000. o nts 6 is about 90>r elderly occupied. Loan
tp3/1
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICR+LAB
CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES
/0 �s