The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1980-10-21 Info PacketE City of Iowa CIC) MEMORANDUM Date: October 16, 1980 To: City Council and City Manager From: Larry Chiat, Development Coordinator Andrea Hauer, Planner/Program Analyst Re: Preliminary Design Plans Submitted by Plaza Towers Associates I. INTRODUCTION This memorandum presents the staff response to the preliminary design plans submitted by Plaza Towers Associates on August 29, 1980. Initially, the staff will make two recommendations to the City Council. First, that the general approval of the preliminary design plans by the Council be made subject to the stipulations and conditions contained in the recommendation of the Design Review Committee, dated September 17, 1980. Second, that further information from the developer be required in order to assure compliance with the following specification mandated by the Prospectus: Provide a central HVAC system or an acceptable alternative system approved by the City. The plans submitted for the HVAC system need to be detailed further. It appears that there could be up to six separate systems to service the hotel and department store. It should be noted that staff has not found that the developer has failed to comply with this required specification. Rather, further information from the developer should be required to assure compliance with the above items. II. ISSUES RELATING TO THE PRELIMINARY DESIGN PLANS As might be expected, staff has found the plans to be in the preliminary stages, and some information on the development is still unknown or uncertain. Upon review of these plans, staff feels that the following issues are of concern and it is recommended that the Council require that the developer further address these issues prior to final Council approval of the preliminary design plans: A. There is a problem with respect to the Linn Street entrance/exit in that it presents a conflict between the safe passage of pedestrians traveling north -south on the Linn Street sidewalk and the east - west vehicular traffic emerging from the service and receiving areas of the hotel/department store. This entrance/exit should be very clearly marked and signed for both the safety of the pedestrians and the vehicles. A similar problem will also exist at the Dubuque Street entrance/exit. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LA9 CEDAR RAPIDS - DES MOINES I ^• 2 11_%1 B. There is some concern as to how the "Boardwalk" will function safely and effectively, especially as a two-way street. Again, signage, street striping, and traffic barriers are needed to protect the safety of the pedestrian traffic passing at the Dubuque Street and Linn Street intersections with the Boardwalk. In addition, it is not clear as to whether a sidewalk, which would permit pedestrians to walk in a east -west direction, will parallel the Boardwalk. C. The size of the hotel/department store service and receiving areas may be inadequate. The extent of this problem cannot be identified at this time because the exact number and types of retail tenants are not known. Staff is concerned that the frequency of use of the receiving area together with the number of service vehicles could result in congestion that could overflow onto Dubuque and/or Linn Street. Staff feels that the underground ramping of the service and receiving areas is an effective design approach that alleviates many of the problems and conflicts that could occur between the service and the hotel vehicular traffic. It is felt that with adequate signage, street,striping, and traffic barriers that most of the safety issues can be solved. D. It is not clear as to whether the hotel drive-through lane will be functional in terms of use by buses. E. Staff is concerned about the the lack of entrances for the department store on its College Street side, especially with the new library opening directly across the street. Staff recommends that an additional store entrance be placed on the corner of Linn and College Streets, and possibly place another entrance on College Street at a midpoint between Governor Lucas Square and Linn Street. The architect has indicated that Armstrong's would consider constructing additional entrances. F. The architect indicated that the facade on the Linn Street side would consist of display windows and smaller cut-out type windows for the basement level. However, this design is still in the preliminary stages. Staff recommends that the developer explore placing an entrance on this side. III. ADDITIONAL CONCERNS RELATING TO THE PRELIMINARY DESIGN PLANS The staff has the following additional concerns relating to the preliminary design plans: A. The exact scale being used on these plans should be clearly identified. 1960 i. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAEI CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES - ^1 3 B. Because the galleria leading from the parking ramp to the hotel entrance will be closed at nights after 9 or 10 p.m., the question arises as to where the after-hours entrance to the hotel will be. It would seem desirable to have an additional hotel entrance on the Dubuque Street/City Plaza side to remedy this problem. C. More information concerning the size, noise level, and the exterior screening of the mechanical equipment for the building (i.e. near Governor Lucas Square and fountain) should be required by the Council prior to final approval of the preliminary design plans. For instance, the hotel kitchen is located directly below Governor Lucas Square and it would not seem desirable to have this kitchen vent its exhaust onto the City Plaza. It should be noted that the hotel elevator equipment and housing will protrude above the 14th floor. D. The Prospectus states that the health club facilities should be placed adjoining the swimming pool "if appropriate". It should be noted that the Plaza Towers Association design shows the swimming pool in the basement and the health club facilities on the second floor. This could present a problem 'for a health club user who would also wish to use the pool. E. It should be emphasized that no code compliance review of these preliminary design plans has been attempted. Various changes in the plans can be anticipated in order to assure compliance with the building code. At this point potential code problems that are apparent include the lack of secondary egress from the ballroom, in the basement, and that the stairways from the 3rd to 13th floors appear to be located too close to each other. F. If plant materials are going to be used for this development, they should be identified and are subject to City review and approval. G. The color of the exterior facade, the materials and pattern of the materials for the facade have not yet been identified and are subject to City review and approval. H. The lighting and signage for the project are subject to City review and approval. I. With respect to the requirements stated in,the Prospectus on the size of this development, the following should be noted: 1. The department store consists of 9,688 square feet in the basement, 29,281 square feet on the first floor, and 36,030 square feet on the second floor, for a total of 74,999 square feet. This is within the 75,000 square feet maximum established by the Prospectus. MicAOFILMED BY JORM MICR+LA9 CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES 4 ' r 2. The small shop retail space consists of 3,462 square feet on i the first floor of the hotel, 5,783 square feet on the second !k floor of the hotel, and 5,755 square feet in the basement of G the department store portion of the development. This is a total of 15,000 square feet of small shop retail, which is the maximum established by the Prospectus. 3. The developer indicates that there will be a total of 15,450 square feet in the basement of the department store portion " for "office, service and.storage." The plans submitted by Plaza Towers Associates in April, 1980, indicated a total of 9,584 square feet in the basement of the department store portion for "storage". The developer indicates that this change has resulted from recently completed soil boring tests, which apparently dictate that a full excavation is necessary for the foundation. tp/sp cc: Don Schmeiser , ,I I, N I " MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR¢LAB Q CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES ', PLAZA TOWERS PROJECT IOWA CITY, IOWA PRELIMINARY PLANS HARRY WEESE & ASSOCIATES PLAZA TOWERS ASSOCIATION AUGUST 27, 1980 MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOIRES 1. y j BUFUJOGTOR SL LAND USE PLAN RYI 1CgO YSCv. IIR S{IOlp 0 p Po G MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES I i I i I, • 1• r, r• BUFUJOGTOR SL LAND USE PLAN RYI 1CgO YSCv. IIR S{IOlp 0 p Po G MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES I .1. s ,I a?rt� 1 LRA �O ARu�.^�CCuS 1S{� ,j 70WEP5 STO.FiYcM 1 :•'�' • 11 1�i �ppfF- STOPL po"m MW 1- - - - _ ---_-- Via. `.►� � ■MUWM ST SrrE PLAN 1 , rr M1Y� 1L�1 I3L0� Y � 1 ' r �' •� MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES lei �4 I . I ' g.. i • t! .1. s ,I a?rt� 1 LRA �O ARu�.^�CCuS 1S{� ,j 70WEP5 STO.FiYcM 1 :•'�' • 11 1�i �ppfF- STOPL po"m MW 1- - - - _ ---_-- Via. `.►� � ■MUWM ST SrrE PLAN 1 , rr M1Y� 1L�1 I3L0� Y � 1 ' r �' •� MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES „ 1 � .Q 1 1 •iFl P.77. lxU f T. SUBBASEMENT FLOOR PLAN 8525 IOWISS ASSOC. SUM. S; 1too /M L^0.P t I— _ o e to ao as �i • • GGMEFRTi:o I NfN/� ` i 4 E u 1•I ' D, I P.77. lxU f T. SUBBASEMENT FLOOR PLAN 8525 IOWISS ASSOC. SUM. S; 1too /M L^0.P t I— _ o e to ao as �i M[�ef1 • Mir. lWtin 'tit:: its, z xz we , •' 0 w 7 r... I s` I aaa Yv� � r • • • ��ryr�E i �1�.•Fie I•� O. • • MM�JfRO�G'6 • ,I A rw+:a< RFK MICROFILMED BY - - JORM MICR+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES • • [] _ .-.)w r— I M[�ef1 • Mir. lWtin 'tit:: its, z xz we , •' 0 w 7 r... I s` I aaa Yv� � r • • • ��ryr�E i �1�.•Fie I•� O. • • MM�JfRO�G'6 • ,I A rw+:a< RFK MICROFILMED BY - - JORM MICR+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES • • [] _ .-.)w r— 1 t P _ LOLLEGC r'TM10ET 'IEr+4l4KY Elr.?MGE . I i \\ wR 0.4 GL*MRL'OH � �� • w 1 I '\; • /Y�Jna-MWNb fNL - I i L v • �v hPETNL \ \ •. \{ • gv• PR1•KiTRONitii 6 za,— \.\ Lacey W yEL mre eevavw', \� - --- tN • _._ i Rk.P W Ww1N6 R?GK CflOL'/ � 1 r z MAIN FLOOR PLAN PLAZA 00WERS ASSOC �y AUG. t[ 1080 R � 0 ! b 20 b \ . 1VRVy` I L MICRUILMED BY JORM MICR+LA6 CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES I. ---------- El t SECOND FLOOR PLAN .LAZA TOIVIAS ASSOC, AUG.2? 19SO N 1 11 0 -.. MICROFILMED BY J0RM MICR+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES �nc_r Ir , TYPICAL \ ROOM I I , \1 ' D FLOORS 3 THROUGH 13 (158 GUEST ROOMS) ouz. SONSNS ASSOC.a' SOD.2 man s ED o f io 00 >o �I 11 k MICROFILMED BY - JORM MICR+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES Y..`l'<'q'o'aYYnrtmixn�e-n•v. SPECIALTY RESTAURANT ' 152 SEATS- COCK- EATSCOCK• SATELLITE KITCHEN J AL • E _ ..w 35 M ATS • • _ COFFEE SHOP COATS W �,` •45 SEATS Y t FOURTEENTH FLOOR PLAN IIAIA Iowaµ ASAaa, AUa. V. 1280 '- I i h LKA to .,:' FI I f� i.:.,lA_ li CrlN�.i'lil I ��L. �.`A.V•ia>'TI li��,r. li .. i`m •�iti—"' �, till •..N q:cc �l �'. O:C t I ' 4apl ��L I it ; rN •c -Aa • 7.•4Lbti �M d+l rAY,:49.: it Eh•Nt[RW' :, Mq ; ;..ql rpt:rPl Cil. r ii � ws•..._ l � I I 1I•n1 TRANSVERSE SECTION I' =- KAIA MAE"$ A61100 _ Avo. }I. Woo 0 5 m 20 Jo I_ O I - MICROFILMED BY - JORM MICR+LA13 - I CEDAR RAPIDS A DES MOINES s3 _.,. ' MICROFILMED BY JORM MICFV+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES i i! 11 i - �S ^ 0 LONGITUDINAL SECTION PLAZA 1CW[M9 ASM. AUG. 0?, 19" 0 ! 10 90 00 , MICROFILMED BY JORM MICFV+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES ^ 0 MICROFILMED BY JORM MICFV+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR4LAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES ti v e i I i NORTH ELEVATION ILAZA 10n]SS ASSOC. AUG. A. 000 o s 10 20 ]0 30 I .L v p a L _ IF R MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES IF I I � • I i I I 1 1 ; ' J � � ,:• ar;;,;lam, • , . � � i� , I __ xr,. _'+'fLt "�°� � �I� j� '�S;w7 I�'�--�If� `.-l. .il ate• Il.. ,l .fl E�. 1. 'r i I . �: �-`rte -.r-r• _ \ Ir• DEPARTMENT STORE PHASE � l\� DEPARTMENT ASSOC {�•. ♦00. SL ISSO VK � .fib;, MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES .. VIEW FROM GOVERNOR LUCAS SQUARE PLAZA TONERS ASSGO. AUG. ]].1980 -t 771 b 1 MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB - CEDAR RAPIDS A DES MOINES RESOLUTION NO. 80-475 f RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY DESIGN PLANS FOR LANDSCAPING AND SIGNAGE FOR OLD CAPITOL CENTER (URBAN RENEWAL PARCELS 83-1 AND 84-1). i WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa, has, pursuant to Resolution 78-456, approved the preliminary design plans for the redevelopment of Urban Renewal Parcels 83-1 and 84-1, subject to the reservation of the right to review landscaping and signage prior to installation; and WHEREAS, Old Capitol Center Partners have submitted preliminary design plans for landscaping and signage for Urban Renewal Parcels 83-1 and 84-1; and WHEREAS, said preliminary design plans have been reviewed by the Design Review Committee; and WHEREAS, a recommendation from the Design Review Committee concerning said preliminary design plans has been received by the City Council; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF IOWA CITY, IOWA, that the preliminary design plans for landscaping and signage submitted by Old Capitol Center Partners for Urban Renewal Parcels 83-1 and 84-1 (Old Capitol Center) are hereby approved, subject to the conditions and reservations set forth in 9 Attachment A to this Resolution, which attachment is by this reference hereby incorporated herein; and I BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that upon this approval, necessary permits for installation of landscaping and signage may be issued for this redevelopment project, contingent upon full compliance with all applicable codes and ordinances. It was moved by Roberts and seconded by Neuhauser the Resolution be adopted, and upon roll call there were: AYES:. NAYS: ABSENT: x Balmer x Erdahl x Lynch x Neuhauser x_ Perret x Roberts x Vevera Passed and approved this 21st day of October 1980. z` ( i YOR �1 ATTEST: CITY CLERK i Received & AppYrvoJ 6y a Legal DsparttrUhl A^7i�'y i96a } MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB 5 1� G CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES 1 � Resolution No. 80— Page 2 ATTACHMENT A TO RESOLUTION NO. 80-475 The approval of the preliminary design plans for landscaping and signage submitted i i by Old Capitol Center Partners, as set forth in Resolution No. 80-475 , dated October 21 1980, is hereby made subject to The following conditions or reservations: That the following issues be referred back to the Design Review Committee for additional review and a further recommendation to the City Council: 1. Blue color in Old Capitol Center sign. 2. Orange color in the Osco Drug sign. 3. Theatre signage. i A 1 y . 1 � ( r y I; MICROFILMED BY - - e JORM MICR+LAB — � CEDAR RAPIDS DES MOINES 3 City of Iowa CC MEMORANDUM Date: October 10, 1980 To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Dale Helling, Assistant City Manager Re: Collective Bargaining �- !` The City bargaining team will meet with the Firefighter's Union at 7:00 P.M. on Monday, October 13, 1980, and with the Police Union at 10:00 A.M. on Tuesday, October 14, 1980. Both meetings will be for the purpose of submitting counter -proposals in response to those initially presented to the City. In both instances this will be the second meeting in the FY82 bargaining process and both meetings will be open to the public as provided by State law. Steve Rynecki will be present at your informal meeting on Mqnday along with other staff members. Time has been set aside for informal discussion in executive session to discuss the City's position regarding counter -proposals. Attached to this memorandum are copies of initial proposals from both the Police and Fire Units. The page marked "Fire" includes the total initial proposal for that unit. The remainder of the material contains proposals from the Police unit. tp5/1 I i -- 1965''; I, 1 MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES i; Local 610 Bargaining Proposal August`21, 1980 Proposal #1 Warnes Fire Fighters Modify pay plan as follows 1) Drop Step B 2) Step A salary remains the same ($13,613.60) 3 Steps C, D, E, H have the following changes on a step by step progression. C......5% increase* Do. 7#% increase• E......SO% increase* F...9..12j% increases • Computations based on Step A Lieutenants dl Captains Modify pay plan as follows 1) Drop First Step 2 Second and Third steps have following changes on a step by step progression. Second Step.......5¢ increase* Third Step........70 increase• * Computations based on Fire Fighter, Step F, for Lieutenant. Computations based on Lieutenant, Third Step, for Captain Local 610 Bargaining Proposal August 21, 1980 Proposal #2 Hours of Work Reduction from a 56 hour work week to the work week used in Waterloo during tO* 079 MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES 1445 J p U i 4; j t. I i J /C� ARTICLE I9 UNION BUSINESS AGRITS. Section 3.. The City shall permit members of :he bargain— ng, committee of the. Association periods of time off with =ay to conduct the affairs of the Association, including time off to attued.Association meetings.. Section q... Members. o E the Association who ae designated or elected. for the purpose of adjusting grievances or assistin; in• the, administrationadmnistratiom of this: Contract sha11 be permitted a reasonable, amount of time: free. from:their• regular duties to fu1fi11 these obligations,. which have. as their purpose the maintenance of harmonious and cooperative relations between the City aad.its policepersonnel in the uninterrupted operation of government.. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LA® CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES 1465 E I j - I y /C� ARTICLE I9 UNION BUSINESS AGRITS. Section 3.. The City shall permit members of :he bargain— ng, committee of the. Association periods of time off with =ay to conduct the affairs of the Association, including time off to attued.Association meetings.. Section q... Members. o E the Association who ae designated or elected. for the purpose of adjusting grievances or assistin; in• the, administrationadmnistratiom of this: Contract sha11 be permitted a reasonable, amount of time: free. from:their• regular duties to fu1fi11 these obligations,. which have. as their purpose the maintenance of harmonious and cooperative relations between the City aad.its policepersonnel in the uninterrupted operation of government.. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LA® CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES 1465 „a i. ARTICLE IT UNION ?EETINOS Section 2,. Officers on duty shall be permitted to attend any Uniom meeting. I � I 1 ARTICLE IT UNION ?EETINOS Section 2,. Officers on duty shall be permitted to attend any Uniom meeting. I MICROFILMED BY JoRm MICR+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES N � I 1 MICROFILMED BY JoRm MICR+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES N ARTICLE. DTII i I SENIORITY Section 5.. Except- as otherwise sspecifically provided. herein, seniority shall be. the. controlling* factor- to be considered '"= making- determination for vacations,. Leave: schedule, lay off",.r=call, and. shift assignment.. gowever-,. the City' affirmative- action. commitment will prevail. for lay off' and recall where•requi^ed by Federal or- State.. law« MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES 194.5 y �i 'i �1 I, i t= t y �1 I, Article Vill Daily and 'deekly Hours of Work Section I. Work Week. c) Days.off shall be defined as begining a'--=1 =1P =n= =ne d5T regularly scheduled workday and, start of. the ❑eXt reguldrly 3ChedL't?d ucrk=a; aa'f as >== . forth in. the schedule in Seczion 1, subsect_on b. I f ARTICLE IX. Change -:1-n Section 5., Section 5. Overtime Rest ?eriod.. If an officer is.reauired to work two (2) or more hour 7t2 y prior to or following his/her - normal work day, he./she shall receive either: a.. :L rest period of at least. one—half (?) hour -at the bel^^ i'A� of ,. or- immediately follovring his normal 'mork day,.. or, b.. One: additional one-half (T) hour of paid compensation at the. overtime rate as: the officer and his supervisor may determine.. ARTICLE IX.. Change in Section 6., Section 6. Stand-•bv Time.. The parties realize that it may be. necessary- or ecessary or desirable for the City to require officers to be available: on a. stand-by status where- they may be called to du.ty upon short notice.. The•City shall advise such officer atthe earliest possible date of any such. required stand-by service:and the: officer shall. receive full straight time- pay for the time: on. stand-by.. ARTICLE IX. Change in Section.7. Section 7.. Accumulated Overtime. Overtime accumulation for time off shallnot exceed sixty (60) hours in any fiscal year and any excess in accumulation over sixty (60) shall be paid. No overtime shall be carried over from one fiscal year to another and any overtime accumulated at the end of the fiscal year shall be paid. 0 MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAE3 CEDAR RAPIDS DES MOINES 1, f ARTICLE IX. Change -:1-n Section 5., Section 5. Overtime Rest ?eriod.. If an officer is.reauired to work two (2) or more hour 7t2 y prior to or following his/her - normal work day, he./she shall receive either: a.. :L rest period of at least. one—half (?) hour -at the bel^^ i'A� of ,. or- immediately follovring his normal 'mork day,.. or, b.. One: additional one-half (T) hour of paid compensation at the. overtime rate as: the officer and his supervisor may determine.. ARTICLE IX.. Change in Section 6., Section 6. Stand-•bv Time.. The parties realize that it may be. necessary- or ecessary or desirable for the City to require officers to be available: on a. stand-by status where- they may be called to du.ty upon short notice.. The•City shall advise such officer atthe earliest possible date of any such. required stand-by service:and the: officer shall. receive full straight time- pay for the time: on. stand-by.. ARTICLE IX. Change in Section.7. Section 7.. Accumulated Overtime. Overtime accumulation for time off shallnot exceed sixty (60) hours in any fiscal year and any excess in accumulation over sixty (60) shall be paid. No overtime shall be carried over from one fiscal year to another and any overtime accumulated at the end of the fiscal year shall be paid. 0 MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAE3 CEDAR RAPIDS DES MOINES Article IX Overtime — Standby Section 2. Overtime will be compensated at the rate of one and one-half (1+f) times the base hourly rate of tale officer, �:riless herein otherwise specified. Overtime may not be obtained from two sources for the same time. `.mDloyees who aro ronL__eV1 to work in excess of four (4) consecutive hours of overtime pensated.for all overtime in excess. of the fi-ri_•ne shall ho cs — the rate -of two (2) times their daily rate ofroa -our (LL) hours zt compensation may be e f _ s Said P Y either - in rhe form of compensatcry r: . or wages, at the employee's option. Section 9. Any officer directed to aDDear, as specified in Sec. 8, or at the direction of the Chief. of*Poiice, or his represen— tative, on a day that is not his normal working day of is a. day Off, vacation day, or previously scheduled tine o*', seal'_ be times at the rate of two (2) tmes his regular rat a of pay, The greater of two (2) hours or actual time spent will be credited to the officer,. except as provided for in section 10. Section 10. The City shall notify employees of appearances as specified in Section 8 above, or at the direction of the Chief of Police or his representative, at least eighteen (18) hours notice, the employee shall receive a minimum of four (4) hours overtime at the appropriate rate unless the appearance occurs during the employee's regular duty time. Section 11. If the City fails to notify the officer of a cancellation prior to eighteen (18) hours preceeding the previously scheduled appearance, the officer shall becredited with two (2) hours overtime at the -appropriate rate as a result of the City's failure to notify said officer. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+L A B CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES V� ARTICLE IX.. Proposed new Section Section. 3.. F. ALL !'1 a) Recall. is a communication to an officer by the Chief of Police , or•his.authorized representative while the officer is off duty directing him/her•to proceed immediately to engage in work: or - :o report. for- such work at- a. designated time.. b) An• officer recalled and placed on duty shall receive a minimum of' four•(4) hours credit as time Forked,. An. officer recalled but: not placed on. duty shall be credited with two (2) hours time: worked.. c.) Any time: credited on: a recall shall be. compensatedfor- on: the. same! basis:as-overtime. d) 'Ahen.an. officer- has incurred an expense towards a scheduled vacation and. he is not informed prior to his departure that it will be necessary to. recall him during his vacation. period. for mobilization, for•partial mobilization, or in obediance to a subpoena or•direction by proper•authori.ty to appear for• the federal government, the!State of Iowa, or a political subdivision•,. or -in a private litigation when not a party to the litigation, he/she shall be reimbursed for his actual provable expenses incurred.. e) If an. officer has, in fact,. departed for his/her vacation and Is - recalled,. he/she shall. have one of the two following options (i) If an officer has been recalled during his/her vacation, at a place other -than his residence, he/she shall, at his/her' option,. be given back the lost portion of the vacation period from which he/she has been recalled, and shall be compensated while on dutyat his regular rate of pay. The officer shall be compensated for such reasonable expenses as he/she shall Incur in traveling -from his vacation site and in returning to his vacation site. Further, he /she shall be compensated for a day's pay of eight (8) hours or less for traveling both to and from his/her vacation site. (ii) In the alternative,. if an officer has been recalled from Us/ her vacation at a place other than his/her residence, he/she shall be entitled to be paid both for traveling expenses i and a day's pay for eight (8) hours or less in traveling, 911' such, time as the officer spends in traveling and in working shall be compensated. at the rate of two (2) times his/her regular -rate of pay. I MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES 1965 i Article X Holidays Section I. The following -days shall be paid holidays for of'icers: New Year's Day (January 1); Washin,atones 3ir%hday (third vcnday in February); Easter; ..... Section 3.. Police Officers on a continuous shift shall'rece=Ye ninety—six- (96) hours..... Section. 4-. For the• purpose.of this Article, the holiday begins at 11:00p.m.. on the day preceeding the holiday date and continues for a period of twenty—four (24) hours thereafter. For non— continuous shift officers, a holiday which occurs on Sunday will be observed on the following Monday. One which falls on a Saturday will be observed the preceeding Friday. N MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES Article X Last paragraph Section 3. If an officer works a full shift on a. holiday, four (u) hours of additional holiday credit will be given during the pay period in which the. holiday occurs. If an officer works more or less than a full shift on a holiday, the premium pay w=--I—be be prorated to the nearest whole hour based. on time worked. any holiday time accrued by but not used by the- officer by July 1 of the: upcoming year shall be paid to the: officer at the holiday - rate of two (2) times: the. appropriate• regular• rate of pay. X96 MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB � .d CEDAR RAPIDS - DES MOINES -R wi;� t MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB � .d CEDAR RAPIDS - DES MOINES -R wi;� ARTICLE XII SICK LEAVE Section 4. Any absence resulting from a duty—connected. injury shall not: inany manner.•be charged to a member's -sits eaves days. for- that year- or- to his act imTatad reserve of such sits: days,. and. in such instance he. shall be paid his com_aen— sation. as: though: such- absence• had. not occurred« S•eation 5« Sick Bank« They City shall take all sick leave, i earned: by officers: at the: 1440, hours maximum limit pad. place. t n: a sick bank. Any, officer* using all forms- of earned Leave: shall be: eligible: to use-, • a maximum: of ninety—six. (96) hours:i.£ he: has a medical problem« The determination. for eligibility shall be. made: by a: majority vote: by secret ballot of the I.C,.P.PA. An. officer• using- sick bank time, sha11 repay the time- at the rate - of one (1) hour• per- month: when he. (she) returns to -pork. 717: 717_ MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LA6 CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES i i Y 1. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LA6 CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES i i ii Article RIII n Section 3. Notification. An officer shall notify his super- visor, or a superv� on duty on the shift immediately preceeding his of any sickness or illness which will cause hime to Hiss cork as soon as reasonably possibly. Unless such notificatior. is given within one (1) hour after the beginning of the work cal, t;e abscence will not be charged to sick leave but may be charged to other accumulated leave or to leave without pay.=molcyees who become sick on duty shall make- every reasonable attempt to notify the shift supervisor before leaving, duty.. For the pur-jose of this section notification relayed by an—intermediary (i..e.. dispatcher, desk personnel. or other- officer) shall be regar,ded as acceptable - notification. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAO CEDAR RAPIDS . DES MOINES -r I i I` l' 1 uvvl I ARTICLE XVII. SHIFT'TRANSFERS Section: 3. Any shift transfer not requested by an. officer - shall be -preceded by a written: notice to each officer to be.o transferred individually-, a) 71-1'tten notice- shall-tclude• the. effective: date- of the. transfer and aU reasons- for the: transfer« Reasons: for the transfer shall be. related to and expressed i:L terms; of the. abiltty and experience of theofficer,. the: naturer and: type-. o.f work to- be- performed on. the shift,. the, need for personaeL having certain: qualifications- slid shift,. - or the: lack: of seniority,. h) Written notice. shaLL be: received by the officer at Least: sixty (60) days prior to the effective: date, of the: transfer In the event the transfer becomes ef= festive less•thatm sixty (60) days after the receipt o -f written noticer the officer shall be. compensated at one: and one—half' (1}) times the. appropriate• regular rate- for that period commencing with the effective date and concluding at the end of that day, which is sixty (60) days following the date upon which written notice was recedved.. Any, overtime. which is earned immediately - prior to or following regular duty hours shall be com— pensated at the rate of two (Z) times the appropriate regular rate: during this period.. Example for Clarification.. Section 4« Trade• me « Officers shall have the right to trade time with. a ac of er« MICROFILMED BY . JORM MICR+LAB d CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES l46S I A�TICLE.XVIII )INSURANCE. n section: 2.. The City' shall provide, at not cost� to the• officer -t. a nolict insurLng' the 1, fe of said offJ' cer n an. amount eaual to his annual salary.. ;any f=actioa.of 31000 is annual salary shall be- rounded off' to the lest higher- thousand.. Is the: policy currently provided. coverage! does not become. of- f'ectivw until (90) days. after- employment,, therefore,. the City will provide: equivalent coverage: from its oum funds: for the, first ninety (90) days: o.f an:. affic:er's: employment: i i i I -I 1 A�TICLE.XVIII )INSURANCE. n section: 2.. The City' shall provide, at not cost� to the• officer -t. a nolict insurLng' the 1, fe of said offJ' cer n an. amount eaual to his annual salary.. ;any f=actioa.of 31000 is annual salary shall be- rounded off' to the lest higher- thousand.. Is the: policy currently provided. coverage! does not become. of- f'ectivw until (90) days. after- employment,, therefore,. the City will provide: equivalent coverage: from its oum funds: for the, first ninety (90) days: o.f an:. affic:er's: employment: r i i �y A�TICLE.XVIII )INSURANCE. n section: 2.. The City' shall provide, at not cost� to the• officer -t. a nolict insurLng' the 1, fe of said offJ' cer n an. amount eaual to his annual salary.. ;any f=actioa.of 31000 is annual salary shall be- rounded off' to the lest higher- thousand.. Is the: policy currently provided. coverage! does not become. of- f'ectivw until (90) days. after- employment,, therefore,. the City will provide: equivalent coverage: from its oum funds: for the, first ninety (90) days: o.f an:. affic:er's: employment: I AEU LEDENTAL INSURA?>� it The!city shall provide at no cost to the 6fficer•, a comprehensive dental.insurance plan. The same -coverage will aiso apply to the -Officer's spouse andchildren at no additional. costs to the Officer. In addition, the-city- shall he•city shall agree to purchase the group insurance from -either AETNA.Insurance Co, or Equitable Life Associates. } i I ( t �I .r,.J MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB` CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES ARCLL XIX we ment Addition to Section 1.. The City shall have all motor vehicles normally used for patrol duties inspected by an authorized State of ioua motor- vehicle- inspectionstation. every three (3) months beg-in— ming. July 1« A request for- an inspection may be made by any of=cer.• at any time. of. anT police: department. vehicle and such a request shall. be granted.. Any desfectcited as a result: of any insectio>z. shall be. corrected before the vehicle is returned to service.. Record. rof each. inspection,. defects cited,and the correction. of thoset defects- shall be kept: in. a. location vri th.:n: the police. department. which. isl accessible to any officer- at any' time... Addition. to Section 4« ThetCity shall provide equipment for- the transrortati_om of bicycles- which is exteraally attached to the vehicle- and. does: not hinder or obstruct the. safe: operation of the vehicle MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES j f i f� 1- ARTICLE. XZX.^Proposed. new sections.. Proposed new• sectio. 9.. An officer- shall notlo c) e a mileage. allowance for reporting-to duty,. but shall be reimbursed for- mileage incurred while traveling-on City business in his/her- own: personal motor- vehicle.. Said mileage rate shall be I thirt-•T cents. (S..30) per- mile.. Proposed aew,sec.tica 10.. The•city shall compensate any employee for. any damage sustained to said employee's motor•vehicla while- said motor vehicle. is. being operated within the scope. of the. employee's. duty under the direction of. the Chief-of Police, i or any motor vehicle operated by an. employee: with the— Know-ledge: and consent. of the owner within. the scope. of the. employee''s j duty as stated above.. Proposed new section II.. The City shall compensate any officer. for any-damage-sustained-to said officer's personal property when. such damage or-injury was sustained while the officer•was- performing duties within the scope of the officer's employ— meat. with. the: City. i i` f p MICROFILMED BY 5 JORM MfCR+LABli - d CEDAR RAPIDS •DES MOINES ._R ARTICLE.XIX. Proposed new sections �t Equipment. Section L2. The City shall provide the following equipment in all Motor vehicles use in normal patrol duties. L) A permanently mounted radio capable -of continuous. and simultaneous reception on all frequencies - assigned to the Iowa City Police Department with the. ability to: properly transmit on all frequencies individually as - selected by the operator. 2) A functional and properly working siren, public address•,_ and emergency lighrobar system, including "alley Lights'"_ 3) A permanently mounted spotlight 10 A protective barrier between the front and rear passenger area consisting of transparent safety material enabling the- driver to have a clear view to the rear of the vehicle 5) A permanently mounted, electically operated rack capable of securely holding issued shotgun. Such rack shall provid ready access when needed. 6) A shotgun of similar type, quality, and caliber as current provided. 7) A rechargeable, handheld flashlight system capable of producing illumination of approximately 20,000 candlepower Section 13. Each officer on duty , regardless of.•issignment-or proximity to other officers, shall be provided with a Droperl; C unctioning portable two-way radio capable of transmiting and receiving on all the radio Frequencies assigned to the Iowa City Police Department. En addition, officers assigned. to walking , traffic control, or any other assignment which creates difficulty in hearing radio tranmissions shall, be MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LA6 CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOIRES c. i r M� L_ ARTICLE.XIX. Proposed new sections �t Equipment. Section L2. The City shall provide the following equipment in all Motor vehicles use in normal patrol duties. L) A permanently mounted radio capable -of continuous. and simultaneous reception on all frequencies - assigned to the Iowa City Police Department with the. ability to: properly transmit on all frequencies individually as - selected by the operator. 2) A functional and properly working siren, public address•,_ and emergency lighrobar system, including "alley Lights'"_ 3) A permanently mounted spotlight 10 A protective barrier between the front and rear passenger area consisting of transparent safety material enabling the- driver to have a clear view to the rear of the vehicle 5) A permanently mounted, electically operated rack capable of securely holding issued shotgun. Such rack shall provid ready access when needed. 6) A shotgun of similar type, quality, and caliber as current provided. 7) A rechargeable, handheld flashlight system capable of producing illumination of approximately 20,000 candlepower Section 13. Each officer on duty , regardless of.•issignment-or proximity to other officers, shall be provided with a Droperl; C unctioning portable two-way radio capable of transmiting and receiving on all the radio Frequencies assigned to the Iowa City Police Department. En addition, officers assigned. to walking , traffic control, or any other assignment which creates difficulty in hearing radio tranmissions shall, be MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LA6 CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOIRES c. i _3_ i ARTICLE: XIX. Proposed new sections, continued. Section 13. (Cont) ker/ microphone attachment to the provided with a remote spea portable radio unit enabling the officer to hear radio tranmiss.ions• without removing the portable radio from its belt carrier. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LA9 CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES 7E� 1 ell Xlx. proposed Section 14« The- negotiating* parties mutually recognize - the importance of reducing motor vehicle fuel costs. and the subsequent possibiity that am alternative fuel system. may be - implemented os either a permanent or•experimentaL basis. - Any fuel system: other than a coaventioaal,, factory installed system using- regular/un•Teaded.gas or gasohoL omplememted on either - a. temporary or, permanent basis shall be the:. absolute- and total responsibility- of the+ City o•f rower City.. Such. responsibilities: shall include but: shall' not: be: Iimited. to;: coaversion:r mainteuance•„ and: refueling of the: alternative: fuel system} proper operation: and: perfarmaucer of vehicles: i:nvolvedr safety and any other• tasks,, dunes,. or procedures: not: commonly performed with: a conventionaL unleaded/regulargas:or- gasohol- system« r�mptcye.es: shall bei responsible: for the: refueling, of conveationai,. factory installed unleaded/regular gas; or gaa"sohol:systems.only.. 1 i ij MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB§ CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES i i -I ;I 'i i L i Xlx. proposed Section 14« The- negotiating* parties mutually recognize - the importance of reducing motor vehicle fuel costs. and the subsequent possibiity that am alternative fuel system. may be - implemented os either a permanent or•experimentaL basis. - Any fuel system: other than a coaventioaal,, factory installed system using- regular/un•Teaded.gas or gasohoL omplememted on either - a. temporary or, permanent basis shall be the:. absolute- and total responsibility- of the+ City o•f rower City.. Such. responsibilities: shall include but: shall' not: be: Iimited. to;: coaversion:r mainteuance•„ and: refueling of the: alternative: fuel system} proper operation: and: perfarmaucer of vehicles: i:nvolvedr safety and any other• tasks,, dunes,. or procedures: not: commonly performed with: a conventionaL unleaded/regulargas:or- gasohol- system« r�mptcye.es: shall bei responsible: for the: refueling, of conveationai,. factory installed unleaded/regular gas; or gaa"sohol:systems.only.. 1 i ij MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB§ CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES ARTICLE XX WWONS AND SPECIAL EgUIPMEN S'ecti'on 1. All weapons',. holsters•,, carriers,. belts,, anal other equipment. required-by- the, Chief of Police: shall be. issued. by and at the expense, o£' then City individually.. An officer shall be, permitted,, but no-t required to substi.tu.te• equipment at his/her own: expense.. Section: 2« Service:ammunitiom for regulation weapons shall be: pravtdad. by the: City, at the• rate of at least IM Denew rounds Or' TgAr,� Section: T. rf' required: to carry, a handgun: im performance. of duties„ as officer shall, have- the right to selec.t,. pay for,, and carry his- own weapoir and equipment there-fb.re,r provided. he/ she• is: abler to demoastrater profictency Lm the. use: thereof.' This Drovision.shall not require•am officer to furnish his•oxn handgun. 'Profictencyl'' shall be: construed. in such manner as to be com— sistemt with that required far a City furnished handgun.. Am offtcer shall have• the: right to. perform. alterations. Ca. Us Owm or City furnished handguns that he• feels- increases. his/her pro fii clear-T. Any,alteratioa performed am a City furnished handgun must be.. of, such a nature., that will not prohibit the return of the, handgun to issued condition„ less normal wear.. Sec six-hundred of target ammunitionayearlyof tlestit fbr each: officer required to. carry a•. weapon to enable the: officer to maintain efficiency with the weapon, Section 5« TE City- shall provide a "state. of the- bullet proof vest capable•of'preventing penetration of'no artless I than a 44 magnum bullet,, and containing a "ballistic.,, and /or ,bhack!r shield. for each officer:. This vest shall be individually fitted to, each. officer,, providing comfort and concealability to the officer-,. The-City- shall reimburse any officer for the total cost of a bullet proof vest-purchased by said officer while employed by the Iowa City Pelice• Department«retroactively. i MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES ■ ARTICLE XRr ADEQUATE FACILITIES Section. i.. The: City shall provide adecuate locker and other facilities separately for male• and. female. officers aad provide security for• these, facilities.. Section: 2.. The- Cit7- shall provide: an indoor pistol range - facility of- at. least 501 1. that complies with all applicable - health: and. safety regulations and/or standards.. Such_ a faciLty shall. allow: simultaneous: use. by ao. fewer than: four- (IL) officers: os am unrestriated. basis.. Section Y. The. CY.ty shall provide adequate space and. equipmeaty. within the: Police Department for an exersize room: including: weight—lifting•equlpmeat.. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES i i -i i -r i j I i, I 1 ARTICLE XRr ADEQUATE FACILITIES Section. i.. The: City shall provide adecuate locker and other facilities separately for male• and. female. officers aad provide security for• these, facilities.. Section: 2.. The- Cit7- shall provide: an indoor pistol range - facility of- at. least 501 1. that complies with all applicable - health: and. safety regulations and/or standards.. Such_ a faciLty shall. allow: simultaneous: use. by ao. fewer than: four- (IL) officers: os am unrestriated. basis.. Section Y. The. CY.ty shall provide adequate space and. equipmeaty. within the: Police Department for an exersize room: including: weight—lifting•equlpmeat.. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES i i i -r I i, i i r �7 ARTICLE XXII UNIMEMS n Section: 1.. f:. One: raincoat* reversible.. consisting- of a. black side: and a. reverse: s:de• of a. refs ec.tive: International Orange.. j. Shoes*. The: City shall pro.vide each officer with: an. allowance: far footwear (shoes or- boots.) in ther amount af f.L•ity,- dollars: (850.00.) per year.. k.. Cleaning.- Allowance. The: City shall provide: compensa— t:Loa: for the- cleaning and maintenance of uniforms: and agnipment in the amount of two, hundred. and fift-T dollars; ($250.00) per year per- officer. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES i L t: ;1 r' ARTICLE XXII UNIMEMS n Section: 1.. f:. One: raincoat* reversible.. consisting- of a. black side: and a. reverse: s:de• of a. refs ec.tive: International Orange.. j. Shoes*. The: City shall pro.vide each officer with: an. allowance: far footwear (shoes or- boots.) in ther amount af f.L•ity,- dollars: (850.00.) per year.. k.. Cleaning.- Allowance. The: City shall provide: compensa— t:Loa: for the- cleaning and maintenance of uniforms: and agnipment in the amount of two, hundred. and fift-T dollars; ($250.00) per year per- officer. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES r y W„ i r r 3)� f ARTICLE XXIV.. Suonlemental Employment Sec.tion.2.. The offiuer•agrees to notify the Ci�y in advance of the - name, address•, and telephone number- of any employer, and if. the- supplemental- employment is related to or along the lines of police• work, to notify the City of the• •+cork schedule• and specific: duties in. additilom. to the• above• information.. ARTICLE XXV'« POSITION CLASSIFICATION., Add. to. Sectio". 2— b. or twenty' (20) consecu.tive days. in. such, other, capacity.. n MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES y W„ n MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES ■ / \ I ARTECLE XXVr GRIEVANCE p DCEDURE I Section 1. De•finitio>r — Generali Rues i a�. The: word. "gr+evance° wherever- used in the. Agreement. means am action commeacedby an officer- or the: Association or- both under the contract when: he: or they fee -1 that he. or they have- been aggrieved by- the.- decision of the, Chi.e:f' of Police: or- the: City,, or - by, the: unreasonable: application,. enforcement: or interpretation. of theprovisions. of this contract or Of a. departmental rule. or regulation.. i. 1 1 1 i I n l MICROFILMED BY ' JORM MICR+LA9 CEDAR RAPIDS - DES MOINES �. 1 i I �1 1 1 g / \ I ARTECLE XXVr GRIEVANCE p DCEDURE I Section 1. De•finitio>r — Generali Rues i a�. The: word. "gr+evance° wherever- used in the. Agreement. means am action commeacedby an officer- or the: Association or- both under the contract when: he: or they fee -1 that he. or they have- been aggrieved by- the.- decision of the, Chi.e:f' of Police: or- the: City,, or - by, the: unreasonable: application,. enforcement: or interpretation. of theprovisions. of this contract or Of a. departmental rule. or regulation.. i. 1 1 1 i I n l MICROFILMED BY ' JORM MICR+LA9 CEDAR RAPIDS - DES MOINES �. i Section L. Commencing July L, 1981, the City shall increase the pay of officers suiant to the following(00*�heduie. A ten percent (10%) across the board raise based or. the June 30, 1981,. salary. + Section 5. Cost of Living. There will be a cost of living al- lowance during the contract year. The method and base for computing. the allowance will be-as follows. a) All computations will. be based on changes in the Revised Consumer Price Index, Urban and Clerical Wage Earners, 1967=100,. published but the. Bureau of Labor Statistics j U.J. Deoarrnent of Labor. _ i b) The base index. month shall. be May, 1981. c) Cost of Living computations will be made monthly to deter- mine-the percent difference between the CPI-W for the base index.month (May, 1981) and for each succeeding month. d) Monthly cost of living allowance adjustments will be made effective the first day of the month following the month in which-it is determined.that the cost of living increased over the CPI-W for the base month. e.) No cost of living adjustment will have the effect of reducing the salary set forth in Section 1 of this Article. i MICROFILMED BY _ JORM MICR+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES n(t �.LaLL hl\J i11 COMPF.d`ISATION Section 3., Night ShLft Differential. a.. Im addition to other wages and benifits,. an. officer shall receive: a second. shift:differeatial compensation of forty—five- cents (3.4.5) per hnur•for reqularly scheduled duty between 3:00 pm and. 11:.00pm•.. An employee• shall receive a third. shift differential com— pensation:o£ sixty cents ($«60) per hour in. addition to other wages: and benefits for regularly scheduled duties between: the. hours: of 11 :.00: pm: and. 7.00am•.. b« Ebr the: purposes- of this section,. those: employees: to. be: included within night✓ shift dif'f'erential pay,, as defined: in: subaectiom A. and commencing- at 3:'00 pm,. shall be, those: employees: whose: regularly,' scheduled shift commences- after 10:00 a=. c:. Lf' the. employee.'s duty shift. is- such that he- works a portion of' :Lt* during the second. shift differential period and. a. portion of It. during the- third shift. defferential period as: defined on: subsection: A,. the: employee: shall receive nay:..at the- appropriate- raty o:f' shift: di.ff'eren.tial during the, hours. worked. In other wordsr if an: employee• perfo=s• four (4) hours of work during the second: shift, he..p • shall be. aid the second shift rate- and the following four 14.) hours of work during- the thirdshift shall be. paid. at the rate! of third shift diffeatial. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS - DES MOINES �; 1 n(t �.LaLL hl\J i11 COMPF.d`ISATION Section 3., Night ShLft Differential. a.. Im addition to other wages and benifits,. an. officer shall receive: a second. shift:differeatial compensation of forty—five- cents (3.4.5) per hnur•for reqularly scheduled duty between 3:00 pm and. 11:.00pm•.. An employee• shall receive a third. shift differential com— pensation:o£ sixty cents ($«60) per hour in. addition to other wages: and benefits for regularly scheduled duties between: the. hours: of 11 :.00: pm: and. 7.00am•.. b« Ebr the: purposes- of this section,. those: employees: to. be: included within night✓ shift dif'f'erential pay,, as defined: in: subaectiom A. and commencing- at 3:'00 pm,. shall be, those: employees: whose: regularly,' scheduled shift commences- after 10:00 a=. c:. Lf' the. employee.'s duty shift. is- such that he- works a portion of' :Lt* during the second. shift differential period and. a. portion of It. during the- third shift. defferential period as: defined on: subsection: A,. the: employee: shall receive nay:..at the- appropriate- raty o:f' shift: di.ff'eren.tial during the, hours. worked. In other wordsr if an: employee• perfo=s• four (4) hours of work during the second: shift, he..p • shall be. aid the second shift rate- and the following four 14.) hours of work during- the thirdshift shall be. paid. at the rate! of third shift diffeatial. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS - DES MOINES �; proposed New. Article R�pLOYEE RIGHTS. Section V. Am employee -shat be permitted. legal represen— tation at: any' stage: of. departmental. investigation,. inter_ogation: or disciplinary hearings.. Secti:om Z. rn the- event: of' any investigation,. iaterro— gatios or disciplinary' hearing,, or' in any' conversation: between: either employees: or ranking' officers: of the. department,; no: empri layeesl conversations: shall be. recorded. or taped without. the- e x-press: he:express: wtten consent of the: employee•.. Pe—or- to such. cna— versation being recorded,. the employee shall be. informed of te., intent to record or tape. said conversation and shall. have: the opportun.ty,. without penalty,. to refuse to consent. to said con.— versatiom without. counsel of his choosing present thatraDre sentative: of the- association. or both. his, counsel conversation is. recorded. or taped,. the employee,. and the. Association shall be! given a copy of any transcription. made of said recording o: tape.. Section 3• whenever a law enforcement officer is under investigation for. alleged malfeasance, misfeasance, or non— feasance of official duty, with.a view to possiblesfollowing action, demotion, dism:i.ssal, or criminal charges, the minimum standards shall apply:. d no a. No, adverse action taken•$omeacref sal of the e shall be wlawnenforce enforcement officer being' investigated to participate in such investigation. or be interrogated other than ,.hen sxch law. enforcement of'ficer is on duty, or when exigent circumstances otherwise require. b,. Any interrogation of'a law enforcement officer shall take. place at. the offices of those conducting the investigation the place where such law enforcement officer reports for dity, or such other reasonable place as. the investigator may determine. c. The law' enforcement officer -being investigated sbMl.l. be•informed,. at the -commencement of any interrogation of the nature of the investigation, the names,of any complainants, and the identity and authority of the person conducting such investigation,, and at. the commencement of any interrogation of such officer in. connection with.any'such investigation shall be inform— ed of all persons present during such in.terrogation.. ALL askeduby ornthrough anany s ngleuch iaterrogator-.. shall. be MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LA9 CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES n d.. No formal proceeding- which. has. authority to penal- ize• a law enforcement officer may be brought except upon. charges; signed by the persons making those charges. e•.. Any interrogation. of: a law enforcement officer- connection. fficerconnection with an:investigatioa shall be: for- a. reasonable: period of time,. and shat allow, for- reasonable orreasonable periods for rest -'and personal aecessities, af7 such. law: enforcement officer., f:. No; threat,. harassment, promise,. or reward shall be:. made: to: any lavr enforcement officer in connectio= with: an: investigation is order- to induce• the: ans- wering af'any question,. but immunity from prosecu- tiom may, be: offered to induce: such. answering. g�. In. the: event of any investigation, interrogation. or disciplinary hearing-,. or in; any conversatiom between: either employees -or ranking officers- of the: depart- ment„ na employees:' conversations shall be recorded or taped without the: express- written consent of the employee•.. Prior -to such conversation being recordedp the: employee. shall be informed of the intent to record or tape:aid conversation and shall have the•opportun- ity, without penalty, to refuse to consent to said conversation: without counsel bf hislichoosing•present and a representative of the Association. or both. Ln. the: event that a conversation is recorded or•taped,. t�Le. employs ey:.his' caims ei-and the: Associatiom.shall be given a copy, of any transcription made of' said. recording or tape. Further-, should an officer request it,. all interrogations at his request shall be: recorded in full. No officer of the department shall be:comp.blled.or required to submit to a polygraph.or lie detector test and no sanction shall be imposed againstany officer for the failure to agree to a ploygraph or lie detector test.. j h. The: law enforcement officer shall be entitled to the presence. of his counsel or any other one person o£'his•choice at any interrogation in connection. with. the investigatiom.. Section 4.. Any, officer suspended from active duty as a disciplinary measure shall,. during the period of such dispatch, continue to incur seniority rights and shall have maintained for him, by the City all appropriated benefits as set forth in. this•agreemeat. However, no employee suspended from duty shall be compensated in. the salaries as set forth. in this agreement.. An. hourly, employee recalled. from suspesion for a court.appear- ance as contemplated in Article IY shall have the right to collect such pay as set forth in said Article., MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES i Section 5« Nc, law enforcementofficer suall be required. to disclose,. for the purposes of promotion or, assignment•,. any item of his. property,. income, assets,. debts,. or- expenditures- or- those• of any member of such. officerls. household,. Sec.tion6.. 71henever- a personnel. action. which w -lL resuLt in any loss. of pay or, benefits,. or, is otherwise- punitiv-e. i taken: against a_ law. enforcement officer*,. such law- enforcement o`_f: cer- shall be. notified. o -f' such action and thereasons. therefor- a reasonable. time: before, such: actio= takes- effect.. Section.T« There, shall be: mo: penalty nor threat: of any penalty for they exercise. by a law enforcement officer.- of• his right under- th±s: W-1 I o:f Rights.. Section &« Niathing-i:a this B111 of Rights shall disparage: or - impair - any other legal. remedy any law enforcement officer• shall have with: respect to. any rights: under this: Bill of Rights► MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS - DES MOINES i { .. i i I 0 Fa Proposed New, Article OFFICER LIASILITrES AND R�SPONSI3ILITT S Section 1.. Duty Qours„ Since. all Police• oif'_cers• are. presumed.ta be: subject to. auty twenty—four (2+) hours per day,. any action taken: by a. member of the. force. on. his. time: off, wch hi would have! been: taken.by an officer on active duty if present or available,. shall be. considered police: action and. the: employee: sha1T have: all o:f the, rights. and benefits- concerning- such action as if he/she, were on: active: duty« The: officer shall be- compen— sated: for the: time: spent in this: activity at the- rate: ox o.v mime: pay,, as: hereto:fbre: defined.. Section 2« rn the, event Of- any civil suitt arising- for the. parfbrmance. of any police duties in:, which the- municipality is. a part Of the: suit,, the- municipality shall provide- am attorney of the: officers: choice: with the! cost to: be oorne. by the- municipal-tty.. Section: j. Indemnity. The. City shall maintain: full and adequate: liability insurance coverage for all police- officers. for all acts and omissions in. theperformance: of their duty within. the scope of their employment: as police officers' of the - Cit -Y; In the event o.f the- failure to. maintain such coverage,, the: City agrees and undertakes to indemnify and save harmless all officers and employees against any' and.all liability,, damages expenses,. causes of action, suits,, claims,. penalties- or judg— ments: arising- as a result thereof,. and. the City shall at its awn: expense, defend any and all suits or a ctions which many, be brought against. any employee,. in which said employee may be Impleaded with others upon any, matter- or- things arising there— from- and the- City shall satisfy,. pay and discharge any and all Judgments. against any employee in any such suits or actions which against them may be brought,. or -in which they may be impleaded withcthers. "Adequate liability insurance shall mean. no less than five million dollars ($5,0009000.00) per. occurrence.. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES J ARTICLE - FALSE'ALARM r�!LS The: City Of Iowa City- and the. I..C..P.P..A.. mutually recognize that: the: occurrence- of 1lfalse" alarms ( i..e.,, those alarms not caused by burglary„ robbery -,., or- major. disturbance) creates- undesir— able! hazards,. dangers,, and increases. costs both for. the- officers and the- citizens of Iowa City.. Ther.efore$. the. following- procedure, shall. be• implemented to reduce! the, incidence• of 'rfalse" ala=s-. Section 1. The- City shaT1 maintain written: documentation: of resvonses:.to,,aad. causes; of all. alarms received by the: Iowa: City Police?Depaitmeat« Section 2:. Ln: the event: that any business or residence generates 2 "false"' alarms- i.>s any given: month,. the. company providing- servicr. om the: alarm: shall be assessed a fee of twenty—five dollars. (325.00) for- each additional ',false11' al'arm.. An alarm company that fails: to: pay assessments shall no longer be. provided service by the LOwa City PoLtce Patrolman.Is Association. I record of assessments: and their collectiom shall be furnished to: the I..C..P..P.A.. by the• City, Assessmeats collected, shall be used. by the. Cit3r for the. maimteaancey::reglacement;. and purchase. of safety and other equip— ment for the•Iowa City Police Department.. Section 5. Officers shall no longer respond. to alarms- received by way o:f'a verbal communication ( i.e.p, phone—in. alarms). Section 4., For the, purpose. of this article, "falser alarms. shall mean any, Uarm:resulting from a system malfunction,. employee errors. or any cause which: can not be determined and is not a result of a burgl:agp,.robbery,. major disturbance,or• does not require immediate action by the Iowa City Police Department. Section: 5. A representative of the alarm company or the. business shall be required to responded. to the location of as alarm with the response time being no greater than fifteen. (15) minutes atter.• notification by the police department. This representative shall be•able. to provide immediate access to the business�aad/or alarm. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB J CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES New. Article Time Off Section 1. For the purpose of this Article, officer means any iemployee as defined in Article L Section 2 of this agreement Section 2. The City shall post by shift a list of officers in order -of seniority. This list shall be posted no later than March 15th.and shall remain posted until May 15th.. If Section 3'.. During, the period commencing with March 15thand ending on May 15th,. officers. hs -all- have the right to designate a period Of time off,. a "designated time off period"', beginning May 16th of the current year and ending on May' 15th of the upcoming year.. Should a. requested time off period include May 15th, the starting date'of the designated time -off period -shall. determine the year in which- the: request should be. made... Section 4•.. A. "'designated. time orf period" shall consist of not less than. five, (5) consecutive regularly scheduled. working days: taken off in any one on combination of paid time off available. (i.e.. vacation,. holiday, personal or compensatory time). Section S. Seniority shall be - the controlling factor for a requested.,."designated time -off period". Section 6. a) At Least two (2) officers may be day off on any given day, as: a result of a "designated time off period". b) At feast three (3) additional officers may take any single day or combination of regularly scheduled working days off on a first come, first serve" basis. Any one or combination of paid time -off available (i.e., vacation, holiday, personal or compensatory time may be used. i j I i i ( i 1 I 1965 MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES City of Iowa City MEMORANDUM Date: October 10, 1980 To: City Manager and City Council From: Rosemary Vitosh, Larry Chiat, Roger Scholten, Andrea Hauer Re: Industrial Revenue Bond Policy and Procedures Attached is a draft of the proposed Industrial Revenue Bond policy and procedures. Also attached are three articles dealing with recent comments on IRBs and a synopsis of the Congressional Budget Office study. It is expected that additions and revisions to the City policy will be necessary due to changing state and federal policies. One or two comments have been inserted in this draft to indicate where changes may be made in the near future. The draft policy and procedures is divided into three sections; policy, procedures, and the application form. The policy outlines the City's .intent in issuing the INS for commercial projects; the industrial project section remains to be drafted. The definition of "public purpose" remains very general; it is hoped that the Congressional Budget Office report might be more specific in its definition of public purpose. In addition, the City's policy proposes to limit the aggregate amount of outstanding IRBs to five percent of the City's total assessed valuation which is comparable to the state -imposed five percent limitation for a city's outstanding General Obligation bonds. Please note that within the policy section, the financing portion outlines several alternative approaches, and these alternatives should be discussed by Council on Monday. The procedures section details the requirements that an applicant must fulfill. Please note that we have proposed, in an effort to increase public participation in the IRB process, that the City set up an evaluation committee composed of City staffinembers to work either with the Planning and Zoning Commission or a newly -created commission to review the IRB application. The recommendations from the committee and commission will be sent to the City Council. The application form section was presented to the Council several weeks ago. Some minor additions and corrections have been made since then, however, this section reads substantially the same. We will be present at the City Council meeting on Monday afternoon to answer any questions you might have regarding this draft. bdw/sp MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES INDUSTRIAL REVENUE BOND POLICY AND PROCEDURES FOR THE CITY OF IOWA CI Y, IOWA I. POLICY A. INTRODUCTION Chapter 419 of the Iowa Code grants authority to incorporated cities to issue Industrial Revenue Bonds (IRBs) for certain private enterprise projects (Section 419.1(2))..The Iowa Urban Revitaliza- tion Act of 1979 has amended Chapter 419 to allow for the issuance of IRBs for commercial projects located within locally designated urban renewal or urban revitalization areas. All IRBs issued pursuant to Chapter 419 are limited obligations of the municipality, with the principal of and interest on such bonds payable solely out of the revenues derived from the project (Section 419.3). B. INTENT The intent of this policy is to provide an organized and consistent approach to, and mechanism for, the evaluation and processing of Industrial Revenue Bond requests. This policy statement will provide to potentially interested persons an outline of how an IRB request would be considered by the City Council. It should be emphasized that the intent of this policy is to assure that each IRB issue is in the best interests of the City, and will assist in the implementation of private projects which will improve and enhance Iowa City. The City is in no way obligated to issue an IRB upon an applicant's request, but will evaluate each application based on the criteria set forth herein. Furthermore, the total aggregate amount of IRBs outstanding at any one time shall not exceed 5% of the total assessed valuation of Iowa City. C. LEGAL COMPLIANCE All procedures leading to the issuance of an IRB, as well as the applicant's utilization of the proceeds from any IRB issue, shall be in compliance with applicable federal, state, and local laws, and the policies and requirements as are contained herein. The responsibility for compliance shall in all cases rest with the applicant. The only covenant or warranty which the municipality shall be required to make in connection with the proposed IRB issuance, either to the applicant or to any other interested party, is that said municipality is a corporation or political subdivision of the State of Iowa, organized and existing under the laws of said State. D. APPLICANT'S RESPONSIBILITIES Except as hereinafter provided, and except as required by law, .t shall be the applicant's responsibility to provide all necessary documents, forms, and related materials, and to advise the City and other parties of all required actions. �b MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES 2 E. POLICIES APPLICABLE TO COMMERCIAL PROJECTS 1. Consistent with state law, the City will consider issuance of IRBS for a commercial project only if said project is located within the City's Urban Renewal Project Area (see Exhibit A) or within such urban revitalization areas as the City may hereinafter designate, pursuant to Chapter 419. Projects in this area requesting IRBS should fulfill the goals and objectives as contained in the Urban Renewal Plan (1979) (See Exhibit B). 2. All commercial projects will be subject to design review by the Design Review Committee procedures and the City Council, pursuant to Resolution 3. IRBS issued by the City shall be used to leverage new commitments to downtown redevelopment, and will not be approved for projects that would occur even without the utilization of IRBS. Comment: According to the Iowa Office of Planning and Programming's Handbook for Urban Revitalization (1980), if a developer is will g to proceed without t IRBS, the IRBS should not be provided by the City. In addition, it is anticipated that OPP's forthcoming report on IRBS will be concerned with the issue that often additional public resources and money are needed together with the IRB to assure a project's success. This additional public money and resources could be interpreted as a subsidy which would put the "non-subsidized" facilities at a commercial disadvantage. The OPP report may also be commenting on the potential impact of having several IRB projects competing in a limited local bond market, i.e. that there may be the potential for market over-crowding. 4. FINANCING CRITERIA Alternative #1: The City requires that applicants, prior to application, make a substantial good faith effort to obtain conventional financing upon such reasonable terms and conditions as prevail in the marketplace at the time. If the applicant can demonstrate that conventional financing is unavailable, the City will then consider the applicant's request for IRBS on the basis of the criteria listed herein. In order to satisfactorily document the unavailability of conventional financing for the proposed project, the applicant shall be required to submit three statements from reputable lenders confirming said unavailability and stating the reasons therefor. Said statements shall be submitted to the City at the time of application. I 1Ito 6 j MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LA6 CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES M 1 3 Alternative #2: The basic policy of the City with respect to financing criteria is as described above (Alternative #1). However, applicants may choose to apply for IRBs without first seeking conventional financing, but the burden shall be on the applicant to establish that its proposed project is extraordinary in the degree to which it serves the public purposes described below. The Staff Evaluation Committee (described below) shall review such requests to waive the conventional financing requirement and offer a recommendation thereon to the City Council. The City Council shall have sole discretion to approve or reject such requests for waiver of the conventional financing requirement. Alternative #3: Applicant is not required to seek conventional financing prior to applying to the City for INS. — 5. PUBLIC PURPOSES TO BE SERVED THROUGH ISSUANCE OF IRB'S The City will consider and evaluate applications for IRB's on the basis of the following criteria: a. The extent to which the proposed project will create new, or preserve existing, employment opportunities within the j community. The City Council is particularly interested in the following categories of employment opportunities: b. The extent to which the proposed project will increase the City's tax base. C. The extent to which the proposed project will enhance and strengthen the downtown as the multi-purpose center for Iowa City and the surrounding area. Comment: The City Council may wish to add to this list of Public purposes or restate the criteria described above. Staff has found very little in the way of definitions from other sources as to what are acceptable public purposes for IRB's. It is expected that forthcoming reports from the Congressional Budget Office and Iowa OPP may provide guidance for the City in more adequately describing acceptable public purposes. Upon receipt of these reports in the next few months, it should be possible to improve this section on public purposes. MICROFILMED BY Al JORM MICR+LA6 P CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES ,I 1 3 Alternative #2: The basic policy of the City with respect to financing criteria is as described above (Alternative #1). However, applicants may choose to apply for IRBs without first seeking conventional financing, but the burden shall be on the applicant to establish that its proposed project is extraordinary in the degree to which it serves the public purposes described below. The Staff Evaluation Committee (described below) shall review such requests to waive the conventional financing requirement and offer a recommendation thereon to the City Council. The City Council shall have sole discretion to approve or reject such requests for waiver of the conventional financing requirement. Alternative #3: Applicant is not required to seek conventional financing prior to applying to the City for INS. — 5. PUBLIC PURPOSES TO BE SERVED THROUGH ISSUANCE OF IRB'S The City will consider and evaluate applications for IRB's on the basis of the following criteria: a. The extent to which the proposed project will create new, or preserve existing, employment opportunities within the j community. The City Council is particularly interested in the following categories of employment opportunities: b. The extent to which the proposed project will increase the City's tax base. C. The extent to which the proposed project will enhance and strengthen the downtown as the multi-purpose center for Iowa City and the surrounding area. Comment: The City Council may wish to add to this list of Public purposes or restate the criteria described above. Staff has found very little in the way of definitions from other sources as to what are acceptable public purposes for IRB's. It is expected that forthcoming reports from the Congressional Budget Office and Iowa OPP may provide guidance for the City in more adequately describing acceptable public purposes. Upon receipt of these reports in the next few months, it should be possible to improve this section on public purposes. MICROFILMED BY Al JORM MICR+LA6 P CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES 4 i v F. POLICIES APPLICABLE TO INDUSTRIAL PROJECTS 9 Comment: Time did not permit staff to complete a working draft of th s section. Many of the policies described in the previous section on commercial projects would be equally applicable to industrial projects, while some policies might be of lesser applicability (i.e. Design Review). In addition, special policies applicable primarily to industrial projects (i.e. environmental/pollution control, type of industry, etc.). should be included in this section. Following discussion by the Council on October 13, staff can proceed to complete a draft of this section. It is obviously necessary at this time for the Council to adopt written policies with respect to both commercial and industrial projects. As stated above, improvements in the policies adopted now should be made at such time as the City is in possession of the forthcoming reports from CBO and OPP. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES i f i 1 .. r MICROFILMED BY r, DORM MICR+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES 5 II. PROCEDURES Requirements a I. It is in the public interest that the issuance of IRB's be made only i after the City has been fully informed concerning the applicant and its current status and future plans; the protection of the City's interests requires thorough investigation of any request for IRB's. 2. The applicant will be required to submit certain information and assume the cost of the City's review and issuance of the IDR Bonds. 3. Matters of confidentiality for public disclosure, relating to the applicant or his business, shall be honored to the extent that such information withheld is not required as a matter of law, as determined by the City's legal counsel. 4. If the applicant retains its own legal counsel to prepare Council proceedings and legal documents, all such proceedings and documents must be reviewed and approved by the City's bond counsel. 5. The applicant must not incur any project costs other than those authorized by the Internal Revenue Code prior to the preliminary approval (Memorandum of Agreement) being authorized by the City Council. 6. The City Council reserves the right to deny any application for financing at any state of the proceedings prior to adopting the final i resolution authorizing the issuance of the bonds. 7. All applications and supporting materials and documents shall remain the property of the City. 8. The applicant shall adhere to the following procedures in submitting a request and application to the City for the issuance of IDR Bonds. Application and Review Procedures 1. Any person or firm desiring to request that the City of Iowa City I issue IRB's shall first secure from the City Manager or the Director of Finance a copy of the City's Industrial Revenue Bond Policy and Procedures. 2. I A written request accompanied by the application form, the required supplemental information and a non-refundable deposit shall be submitted to the office of the City Manager. The amount of the deposit shall be as follows: r MICROFILMED BY r, DORM MICR+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES 6 Amount of Bond Issue Deposit Amount $300,000 or less $300,001-$500,000 $500,001-$1,000,000 $1,000,001-$5,000,000 $5,000,001 or more In addition thereto, the applicant shall agree to reimburse the City for all expenses which exceed the deposit amount and which result from the review and evaluation of the request including but not limited to administration, legal counsel, consulting costs, printing, publication costs and all other incidental costs or fees. 3. Following the receipt of the written request, the application form, the supplemental information and the deposit, the City Manager will notify the City Council of the request and will instruct the Evalua- tion Committee to review the project. The Evaluation Committee will consist of the Director of Finance, an Assistant City Attorney, a representative of the Department of Planning and Program Development, and a representative of the City Manager's office. In addition, the Planning and Zoning Commission or a newly -created commission will assist the Evaluation Committee in the review of the request. In those instances when circumstances dictate review which requires expertise beyond that of the Committee, the proposal will be submitted to an independent consultant hired by the City. 4. The Evaluation Committee and the Planning and Zoning Commission or newly -created commission shall prepare a recommendation on the advisability of the issuance of IRB's to be presented to the City Council at its next regularly scheduled meeting following completion of the Committee's review. This review should be completed within 30 days from the receipt of the request unless the applicant is otherwise notified. The Council will not take formal action on the request until the review has been completed. 5. The City Council will then take preliminary action to approve or deny the applicant's request to issue bonds. If such preliminary approval is granted, the Memorandum of Agreement will be executed. If the applicant retains its own legal counsel to prepare Council proceedings and legal documents, all such proceedings and documents must have been reviewed and approved by the City's bond counsel and then received by the Director of Finance seven days prior to the Council meeting in order to be included on the agenda of that meeting. Any proceedings or documents received late will not be added to the Council Agenda. 6. The applicant should then request that the City Council schedule a Public Hearing on the proposal to issue the bonds. The Public Hearing provides the opportunity for any member of the public to speak for or against the bond issue. I I MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOVIES i , 6 Amount of Bond Issue Deposit Amount $300,000 or less $300,001-$500,000 $500,001-$1,000,000 $1,000,001-$5,000,000 $5,000,001 or more In addition thereto, the applicant shall agree to reimburse the City for all expenses which exceed the deposit amount and which result from the review and evaluation of the request including but not limited to administration, legal counsel, consulting costs, printing, publication costs and all other incidental costs or fees. 3. Following the receipt of the written request, the application form, the supplemental information and the deposit, the City Manager will notify the City Council of the request and will instruct the Evalua- tion Committee to review the project. The Evaluation Committee will consist of the Director of Finance, an Assistant City Attorney, a representative of the Department of Planning and Program Development, and a representative of the City Manager's office. In addition, the Planning and Zoning Commission or a newly -created commission will assist the Evaluation Committee in the review of the request. In those instances when circumstances dictate review which requires expertise beyond that of the Committee, the proposal will be submitted to an independent consultant hired by the City. 4. The Evaluation Committee and the Planning and Zoning Commission or newly -created commission shall prepare a recommendation on the advisability of the issuance of IRB's to be presented to the City Council at its next regularly scheduled meeting following completion of the Committee's review. This review should be completed within 30 days from the receipt of the request unless the applicant is otherwise notified. The Council will not take formal action on the request until the review has been completed. 5. The City Council will then take preliminary action to approve or deny the applicant's request to issue bonds. If such preliminary approval is granted, the Memorandum of Agreement will be executed. If the applicant retains its own legal counsel to prepare Council proceedings and legal documents, all such proceedings and documents must have been reviewed and approved by the City's bond counsel and then received by the Director of Finance seven days prior to the Council meeting in order to be included on the agenda of that meeting. Any proceedings or documents received late will not be added to the Council Agenda. 6. The applicant should then request that the City Council schedule a Public Hearing on the proposal to issue the bonds. The Public Hearing provides the opportunity for any member of the public to speak for or against the bond issue. I I MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOVIES i r -1 I I i APPLICATION FOR INDUSTRIAL REVENUE BOND FINANCING Iowa City, Iowa I. PROPOSED PROJECT INFORMATION: 1) Name of Company: Address: Phone Number: Local Contact: 2) Please explain why Industrial Revenue Bond financing is being requested. 3) Complete explanation detailing how bond issue proceeds will be used: 4) Potential other uses of this facility: 5) Brief description of products to be produced: 6) Does a need for this service or product exist within Iowa City? 7) Will this product compete with other local businesses? 8) Type and number of products produced and/or type and amount of services to be provided: 9) Explain how. this facility will •attract other related industries. 10) Number of local employees currently employed at local business (if business exists at this time) on a full-time and part-time basis: 11) Number of new jobs to be created on full-time and part-time basis: 12) Number of management level employees at Iowa City location: 13) Skill type and salary levels of jobs created and/or retained by this project: 14) Will new jobs be on a seasonal or on an annual basis? 15) Number of people expected to reside in Iowa City as a result of project: a) Number of people moving to Iowa City. /9644 MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR#LAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES M -1 i t MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR#LAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES M i. i I b) Number of people already living in Iowa City. 16) Anticipated demographic profile of workforce: 17) A. Current payroll if already located in Iowa City (monthly/annual): B. Projected payroll (monthly/annual): 18) Projected appraisal/assessed property value in Iowa City: 19) Will company rent or own equipment? 20) Number of years which applicant has been in current business: 21) Number of plant relocations since 1955 (give reasons why relocation occurred): 22) Location of other facilities currently operated by applicant: 23) Location of headquarters of applicant (address, phone number, and contact person): II. ECONOMIC FACTORS (All information to be provided by applicant) 1. Have you ever been in bankruptcy? 2. Have you ever defaulted on any bond or mortgage commitment? 3. Have you applied for conventional financing for this project? III. SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION (Ten copies of each of the following should be submitted with this application) 1. Prospectus 'and report(s) used in connection with any recent debt or equity financing. 2. SEC filings (10 -Ks or 10 -Qs) 3. All reports to shareholders for immediate past 3 fiscal years. 4. Audited financial statements of immediate past 3 fiscal years. 5. Evidence of valid contractual arrangements with other established businesses which indicate the probable financial success of the proposed project. IV. ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS 3 MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LA6 CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES /pleo" 3 I J 1. Exact location of proposed project (plat, map, or diagram) 2. Size of project facilities (sq. ft.) 3. Amount of land required (acreage) i 4. Compliance with existing zoning I . 5. Pollution criteria: A. Water 1. Project requirements (gallons per day) 2. Use of water (heating, for product use, etc.) 3. Flowage rates (hourly, daily, seasonal, annual) 4. Water line requirements for fire protection 5. New and/or enlarged lines required from existing mains? B. Sewerage 1. Compliance with Clean Water Act 2. Effluent constiuents (type and amount) 3. Toxic or hazardous wastes (as defined by EPA) 4. On-site pre-treatment necessary? 5. Final treatment -- on-site or municipal treatment? 6. New and/or enlarged lines required from existing mains? C. Air 1. Compliance with Clean Air Act II 2. Impact on State Implementation Plan (SIP) 3. Air pollution constiuents (types and amounts) ! 4. Odor(s) 5. Visual impact (smoke plume, haze, fog, water vapor, etc.) MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB H CEDAR RAPIDS - DES MOINES 4 r�) D. Noise 1. Compliance with Noise Control Act 2. Change in noise and vibration levels 3. Impact on nearby properties (can be shown diagramatically using frequency and temporal distribution, and magnitude) E. Other 1. Compliance with Stormwater Management Ordinance 2. Visual appearance of plant and landscaping 3. Impact on fragile area(s) (e.g. headwaters area) V. COMMUNITY SERVICE FACTORS 1. Ability of existing trafficways to carry additional traffic load. 2. Projected number of vehicles due to: a. Workers b. Manufacturing process and c. Other transportation modes to be used by facility (rail, air) 3. Would this facility's employees use public transit? 4. Utilities (other than water and sewerage) a. Natural gas b. Electricity (detail load requirements) C. Use of alternative energy sources (solar, cogeneration, etc.) Note: These procedures, once in final form, will be presented using a functional graphic layout. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB CEDAR. RAPIDS • DES MOINES W I' 4 4 r�) D. Noise 1. Compliance with Noise Control Act 2. Change in noise and vibration levels 3. Impact on nearby properties (can be shown diagramatically using frequency and temporal distribution, and magnitude) E. Other 1. Compliance with Stormwater Management Ordinance 2. Visual appearance of plant and landscaping 3. Impact on fragile area(s) (e.g. headwaters area) V. COMMUNITY SERVICE FACTORS 1. Ability of existing trafficways to carry additional traffic load. 2. Projected number of vehicles due to: a. Workers b. Manufacturing process and c. Other transportation modes to be used by facility (rail, air) 3. Would this facility's employees use public transit? 4. Utilities (other than water and sewerage) a. Natural gas b. Electricity (detail load requirements) C. Use of alternative energy sources (solar, cogeneration, etc.) Note: These procedures, once in final form, will be presented using a functional graphic layout. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB CEDAR. RAPIDS • DES MOINES W 4 f fi I \ n ti Exhibit A ^Jrban Renewal Plan (1979) ObjeL Jes a. To eliminate substandard buildings, blighting influences, and enviroronental deficiencies in this important section of the City of Iowa City, and to establish conditions which will prevent the recurrence of blight and blighting conditions. b. To strengthen central Iowa City as the retail business, financial, administrative, go educational,alt and cultural center of the area. C. To strengthen the economic well-being of the central area and the City,by increasing retail activity, taxable values, and job opportunities. d. To establish a pattern of land use activities arranged in compact, compatible groupings so as to enhance their efficiency of operation and economic inter -relationships. e. To provide for the orderly physical and economic growth of the central area through controlled redevelopment and rehabilitation. f, To privatetde safe, vehiculareaccessnto centralattractive City. and g, TO provide a safe, efficient and attractive circulation system which minimizes conflicts between different forms of traffic such as pedestrians, hicyca es, nutnmobilcs, traulsit and survice vehicles. h. To encourage coordinated development of parcels and structures in order to achieve efficient building design, multi-purpose use of sites, unified off-street parking, trucking and service, and internal pedestrial linkages. i. To provide for off-street parking facilities in locations easily accessible from major thoroughfares and central area destinations alike including' long- term parking facilities on the periphery of the central area, and including existing off-street parking outside the project area boundaries. j. To improve the appearance of buildings, rights-of-way and open spaces, and to encourage high standards of design. k. To aid the University of Iowa to expand in an orderly way, so the University and the Business District can each perform its own function with minimum conflict and mutual benefit. aces and Ix Jestrian ways, whit 1, To provide for open sp reinforce the pedestrian orientation of downtown lawn City. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LA6 CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES /T& . I -2- n m. To provide for residential development within the project area, in order to enhance housing opportunities, especially for the low income, elderly, and handicapped in downtown Iowa City. n. To provide an enviromnent which improves the attrac- tiveness of public transit in Iowa City, and which reinforces the viability of the public transit systems. o. To encourage the restoration and rehabilitation of structures within downtown Iowa City which are of architectural or historic significance. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LA9 A- CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES e -2- n m. To provide for residential development within the project area, in order to enhance housing opportunities, especially for the low income, elderly, and handicapped in downtown Iowa City. n. To provide an enviromnent which improves the attrac- tiveness of public transit in Iowa City, and which reinforces the viability of the public transit systems. o. To encourage the restoration and rehabilitation of structures within downtown Iowa City which are of architectural or historic significance. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LA9 A- CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES PROJECT AREA MAP X cr U 03 University I I 03 LWASHINGTON ST (1 84 n p r D r C Z v Old rp Capitol Zi Nqjcf Center O C Z Hawke rn COLLEGE ST � Barber C lie ~ Unive sity 1 e S4 B ock B Parking 0pJParking fA BURLINGTON ST Z tual n N aVl 5 p b Loa O Pentacrest to a Z arden toJG Apts Ba k fA COURT ST LEGEND PROJECT BOUNDARY PARCEL BOUNDARY 00 BLOCK NUMBER eL' MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR¢LA13 CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES n z m m i 3 w v 0 0 z Nr -'W DEVELOk- JIENT FINANCE 1.CHNIQUES Directing Capital to Smaller. Firms I?v ' •virence Litvak Witiespread evidence that capital subsidies are ineffective is causing a shift In thinking about development finance. Increasing attention is being focused on correcting capital market imperfections that shut out small, high-risk businesses, which offer the greatest job -generating and growth poll,ntial. D, clupmeat officials in a southern quire that to be effective, capital sub - state .,Ic worried. Toofew of the firms sidies must be larger and more expen- they have been assisting through devel- sive than they have been. open ,,t finance programs are failing. ri For example• an interest subsidy that 7 he dal s when development finance reduces the borrowing rate from 10 per. was limited to capital subsidies that cent to 2.5 percent (about twice the rc. sin, -.Lack chasers could use to attract duction provided by an industrial rove. Forwim 500 companies are slowly, but nue bond) will on average increase a inexorably, fading. The new focus is on making capital available to otherwise sound but underfinanced homegrown firms Although their job -creating po- tential,s relatively high, these ventures also tend to be risky. The absence of def: I•s in the southern state's program indicates that these underfinanced firms are nit being reached, and that too mu-. :roney is going to businesses that could be served by conventional If nd. Sul-,i.lizing Capital Costs Fer two decades, development fi- nance meant lowering capital costs as an a' ,'icuon device. "If we can just depress the costs of capita! through in- dustrial revenue bonds of property tax aba: „enu," the thinking went, "we can tompensale for other production cost nr market disadvantages in our area. But the view that communities can influence industrial location by sub- s idiz.,tg capital costs has been changing. The basic limitations of capital sub- sidies •s an economic development tool are o; •ious. Capital costs do not weigh heavily in the oberall costs of produc- tion ' nial annual capital costs (depre- ciatimt, interest and after-tax profits) are generally only about 10 percent of the :otal value of sales. Inter -area dif- ferences in other costs, such as raw ma- terials. labor and energy, can be sub- stantial, as are differences in proximity to growing markets. These factors to - Lor renee Litvak is an economic consultant in Son Francisco, He recently cc -authored Innen urinm In Drrrropmenr Finance (Council or State Planning Agencies, 1979) with Bel- den Daniels. The book discusses the themes of this .micle in greater data. 18 April 1980 Unless a community can predict fairly accurately the cases where a subsidy will make a difference, a lot of money will be spent giving subsidies to firms that would have Invested anyway Lsubsldlirs m's ateofprof'bl three -tenths of e ecent.In Europe, where capital havebeen more effective, yaverage25percent of the total capcost (principal plus interest) of each ployeit. Tax abatements have a similarly small at on the cost of new invest- ment. A mere 2•percent difference in unit labor costs between two areas could offset a 40 -percent tax difference. Unless a community can_predict fair y aeeuraiely,ihe cases where,a sub: silly will make a difference, a lot of money will be spent giving subfidiei to firms that would have 'invdsted 6441. County development officials in Ohio, for example, believed that a 12 -year property tax abatement was "the key- stone of the deal" that induced a S20• million bicarbonate plant to locate in their area, But a company official ad- mitted, "The tax abatement was a nice kicker at the end, but we chose the stale mainly because of its strategic location for distribution and market growth." Episodes like this represent the rule rather than the exception, researchers have found. But a healthy skepticism about capital subsidies has been grow- ing for some time, and is only one di- mension of the new thinking on devel- opment finance. The key dimension is an increasing awareness of what can best be termed "the capital availability MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS s DES MOINES problem." In essence, the capital avail- ability problem is the failure of capital markets to finance enterprises that do in fact offer a competitive return. Capital Availability A popular image of the financial sys- tem depicts financiers leaving no roc, unturned in their search for profit. Yet capital does not always flow to altrac• live ventures. As investment banker and former E DA official Robert Podesta said in testimony before Congress two years ago, "I son of grew up as a Re- publican, and ... when I started in EDA, 1 didn't believe in it.,Back when Congress was debating the Small Buv,- ness Act, I was on the Small Business Committee of the Investment Banker Association. We said exactly what you are saying, 'that things that ought to be financed tend to get financed.' The fat* is, that is wrong: it isn't true...." Accumulating evidence shows at. abundance of capital market failurrs. Imagine the capital allocation process as one in which ventures competing for funds are assigned a place in a queue. Those firms coming first have first claim on capital, and standings are supposed to be assigned on the basis of risk- adjusted, expected returns. But some enterprises that ought to be nearer the front of she queue get shunted toward the rear. Higher -risk ventures go unfunded be- cause of the absence of market mocha- nisms that could minimize risk to poten- tial capital suppliers. Financial Inter- mediaries do not have accurate or suf- ficient information about certain kinds of firms. Steeper transaction costs for making and following some loans keep certain businesses out or the credit queue altogether. Some financial insti- tutions with monopoly power raise funding barriers higher than they would be under competitive conditions. Sup- pliers of capital can be biased for tea - sons of sex, race or politics. And goy ernmeni regulation in capital markets creates unintended distortions. e Iran a glint in some econm^ •ran's cyc, these capital market -urs strike hard at independent, sing.,• ruablishment firms, which generate f- let half of the new jobs in our econ. ••.t On the whole, these firms suffer it •lu high debUequity ratios, reflecting Ilreir difficulty in raising equity capital t;,1. -ugh either the public market or Yen - t;« capitalists. Their debt financing dif- fers from that of larger firms as well: it is stoner in term, and when long-term, it is more often supplied by banks than private sources. .A business enterprise must be able to lap different sources and kinds of capi- L f at different limes over its life cycle. I weclosing any one source can have the same effect as depriving a develop - i organism ore vital nutrient. Idusinesse.s that have been denied fi• naricing by institutions can be nurtured t � .ugh public development finance pl ugrams. By correcting or counteract- ing the imperfections that produce on - i, tlinancing or sound. small firms, po- lentialjob opportunities can be brought to life. A stale or city can build on the unrecognized strengths in its economy, ratherthan trying to compensate fordis- +r'•antagesbysubsidizing capital costs. From Theory to Practice New thinking about development fi• mmee is gradually being transformed tnro new policies. Such policies use all three strategic tools for public capital a;•-cation—administrative regulations, e. rnonnic incentives and direct public financial intermediation. Capital market failures strike hard at Independent, single. establishment firms, which generate over half of the new jobs In our economy. The possible use of regulatory au• thority to combat geographic redlining in mortgage lending -has-awakined a number of states to the-potenda(•ot ad• ministrative regulation. as a toorfor re- directing private capital flows. But his• lorically, regulation of state•chancred financial institutions has given short shrift to the objective or fostering eco- nomic development. Moreover, the other goals of financial regulation have been pursued in ways [hat unnecessar• ily stifle investment in small and young firms. Use of administrative regulation to influence private capital flows can work in some instances. But regulations that appear to require undesirable loans or investments can cause an outflow of capital from regulated institutions. The usual response to capital mobility problems is'to offer economic incen. lives for institutions to channel funds - toward underfinanced, but deserving firms. The primary instrument here is the loan guarantee. Even though loan guarantees are often thou�t of as cap• ital subsidies, their unique contribution is in influencing the.availability of cap. ita1. If fees and premrumsare se[ to re- flect the true costs of providing the guar• antees, such a program will operate like a self-supporting insurance fund. Both administrative regulation and economic"inccmivcs rely largely on changing the practices or private finan. cial intermediaries. A -third strategy uses publicly owned and controlled fi- nancial intermediaries to make funds available to firms experiencing ddf- eulty in private capital markets. The govemment—federal, state or local— either borrows in the capital market or taxes its citizens to raise funds and then relends and'iiivests"them'in'such firms. These' public intermediaries can Irclp correct capital market failures by pro- viding more efficient allocation of nsks, reducing information and transaction costs, promoting competition and aIle• viating discrimination. Since 1970, stat, governments have created a number of new development -oriented financial in. (—*An illuminating example of the slow diffusion of the new thinking on devei• opment finance is the attempts since the late 1960s to reform industrial revenue bonds. Rather than using IRBs solely to subsidize capital costs, these reforms he?urage their use in making more apical available to smaller firms suffer. Ing from capital marlet imperfections. Simply limiting the size of projects that can quality for IRBs, as accord• plished by the Revenue and Expendi• ture Control Act of 1968, was not bid. ficient. While the bonds came lobe used more often for smaller, local companies and less for Fortune 500 type firms. funds were still not getting to the small firms that really needed them. This is not surprising. Since conventional rev• enue bonds are backed only by the in. Capital market lailures nave Inert harshest rmoact on Small, indepencent him$. A loan 0vafanteed by the Small Business Aom,nrs. Ifalion helped meet the hnancing neecs of RDA, Inc. of Beltsville 'd .rylano The him employees 25 people in the manulaetuse of minicomputer systems nad medical msuu• nenls. Rrghl, employees nsserrnite printed cucuu boards for eouipmenl used in pnahnq eatdrac arrest: above. FDA's Mnoucnon manapof checks operation of a campuler in, Ttnal. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES Commentary 19 Mo' cmrZ of the recipient firm, they be used to finance a firm etre: considered creditworthy by the capital Cniost all IRSi . for small to :ucdium-size eompsnl"% are private pl icments with local banks. Busi- u• • %es that want the subs,dy associated with ievenuebond'llnadcing usually go .te i local banker, iLho helps.them deal wolf irate ind'loiil-offieials. The local bank then purchases the bland issue. But tit -'e is little incentive for the bank to finance a company it otherwise would have refused. A few states have gone beyond merely placing restrictions on the size Businesses that have been denled financing by institutions cart be nurtured through public development finance programs. at revenue bond financings to a more critical change: they offer some collat- .. ,1 or security to the bond purchaser, bey raid the current income of the recip- wa, firm. One method for doing this has %:cn to insure the bonds through state loan guarantee . programs. Another m: shod has been to back the bonds with the full faith and credit of the state, but this is not legal in most jurisdictions. There is an extreme solution to freeing a public financial intermediary from the undesirable practices of pri- vs.e financiers, namely, a tax -financed program. More than a dozen states have suAh loan programs, but their growth Ira% been stunted by the political prob- lems inherent in using sizable chunks of crrent revenue to fund them. And some states with tax -financed programs are experiencing insufficient, rather -hill excess demand for loans. This problem—reflecis'sevcnd, factors: the program is new; it tacks effective pub; I;city: and most important. it is_ eR• trimely cedtralized. The Local Role Beyond developing the most appro- priate sources of investment capital, the major challenge facing the new devel- opment finance may be proper decen- tralization. As David Birch of MIT has I.11sighdully pointed out."Wc know that smaller, volatile firms are the major re- placers of lost jobs, but we have no ex• reiience in identifying and assisting them in large numbers. Because they Are small. we must reach many of them to have a measurable effect. Because they are volatile, we must carefully monitor each firm's performance it we arc to gain maximum benefit from our invemcd dollars Ion lite high side) and 20 April 1980 avoid scandal (or he low side)." (Seen Reauthorization of NPWEDA may "Generating New Jobs" by David i lalso open up the first substantial source Birch, July 1979 ( ammenrary•) of equity capital for local development The importance of proper decentral- finance. This is especially important be- ization is illustrated by the Pennsylva- cause small, growing firms sorely lack nia industrial De%:lopment Authority, equity financing to free them from on - which administers a largely tax - financed business loan program. Unlike Even a city like New York, with similar programs in other states, there is excess demand for PIDA's loans. But highly developed private capital ped private cap PIDA is also effectively decentralized markets has he through BO local industrial development need for a public investment authorities at the county and municipal bank. level. These groups assume much of the responsibility for originating loans to yielding principal and interest payments firms in their communities. until they begin generating positive cash Clearly the administrative problem of flows. Under Title 1 grants, recipients providing financial assistance to small will have the option of investing the businesses cannot be solved at the red. funds as equity. Furthermore, if EDA oral or even the state level. Local de. decides to undertake an equity finance velopment agencies and organizations demonstration under Title 111. commu- must step into play )fie—rofe of.public Allies will also be eligible to apply for sector investment banks. Like private equity finance funds. A Small Business -investment banks,- they -will serve as Investment Company could be set up "middle men", between their client firms and sources of 'eipital. In this using the EDA funds and a small a mount of private capital. The SBIC case; however, the client firms will have beenpoorly served by conventional could, in turn, borrow additional low- cost investment capital from SBA. nanc of ancial institutions, and the sources of capital will be public or publicly - d leverage . A business enterprise must be able to tap different sources and kinds of capital at different times over Its life cycle. Even a city like New York, with highly developed private capital mar- kets, has acknowledged the need for a public investment bank. The city re- cenoy established the Economic Capi- tai Corporation (ECC), whose explicit purpose is to "prcvLj better -access to financing far businesses irUhe city." not to find capital subsidies. The ECC will create financing packages on a joint and cooperative basis with private and public participants. Its sources of capi- tal include EDATitle.11.loans, SBA. Section.SQ'_ loans.and.New-York State' Job Development AOlhoriky.LQan;. The ECC is also the processing agent for New'"York-'Cily.s; Revolving—loaq Fund;'erealed out of HUD community development funds-and_:_EDA"Tille—IX funds. , Further impetus for efforts such as the Economic Capital Corporation should emerge from reauthorization of the National Public Works and Eco- nomic Development Act (NPWEDA). currently tied up in conference commit- tee and jeopardized by budget reduc- tions. Indications are that state and lo- cal agencies will play a larger role in packaging and perhaps administering some grants and loans. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES Making the Transition Despite increasing application of the new development financing techniques in states and localities, their diffusion may continue to be slow. One reason is that public officials perceive a better political payoff from the highly visiole. large private investments that capital subsidies often appear to produce. An- other factor is that public officials are often unsure of the real sources of eco- nomic development: since other states and cities use subsidies. officials cannot risk abandoning them. The fact that rev- " nue ev"nue bond subsidies arep ra d most di• rectly by'the federal government makes continuation of the, status quo even easier. The ability of the old and new devel- opment finance to coexist, at least to a point, is facilitating the transition to the latter. The City of Lowell, Massachu- setts recently used SS million in UDAG money for subsidized financing of Wang Industriesinternational headquarter%. But the principal and interest payments from this loan will be recycled into fi- nancing for smaller firms. And very few people are recommer,u- ing that communities reject capital sub' sidies' entirely. Rather, they advocate limiting them to cases where the invest - men) would not likely be made other• wise, and keeping them proportional t.' job and income benchis.ln other words, eommunilies'heea not change their de- velopment finance diet entirely: they need only to replace the empty calorics L with more nutritious rare. 40le VII IRL'L3U11(127X1 O11 Wall St. Jour' -1, Wed, Oct. 8y 17s' IUseofTax-Ex.empiFinancing for Sto-And Other Business Soars, Stirring C try DANIEL HEaT72""o ketin has het I •-41N//7r g ped to hide the explosive lot b do with Iradltichal government tune• rrrurtn o/TNx w�eL S7aCLTJodaNAe growth o! such financings, which typically dons any more," notes John Petersen, an "You deserve a break talay," mcDon• save the borrowers two or three percentage economist for the Municipal F7nance Oftl• aid's tells its fast-food customers. And the points in Interest cars. cers' Association. hamburger giant Is laking its own advice. I Federal Limits In his view, state and local governments i In building scores 0( its familiar restau• are becomin more Ilse local Boves.for the '•'i . rants, McDonald's Corp, is getting a (inane• 0' for Years has been trying to vate sector Band less Ilse tax collectors. ..10 Ing break through sales of government•spon. stem the abuses and loss of tax revenues ••µTeat they're really selling is sheltere shot• ! - sored tax-exempt bonds. Last year, for in- from the sale of these Industrial -develop - stance, AlaDonald's financed 57 new restos- "cent bonds, or induslrial•revonue bonds as ter from federal taxation." he contends.. rants in Pennsylvania and Ohlo with tax• they are sometimes called. In 1968 It hn. More Revenue Bonds free bonds floated by local communities.. posed a $ 5 million limit on the size of prof• Mr. Petersen says that In 1960, such tra• Those are the kinds of securities once re- e ts bat could be financed with tax exempt dldonal public purposes as education, trans• served for building schools, sewers or public bonds, •bough It excluded certain projects porlation, sewers and water supplies ac• highways. And to a growing number of crit• such as airport, port and pollution -control counted for 65% Of long-term lax -exempt its, it's the latest abuse of the popular Indus. Programs. The legislation was an effort to borrowing. By 1979, that figure had !alien to �••'• trial -development bonds. . keep huge companies from enjoying tax-free 23%. The difference reflects the explosive Suddealy, hundreds of commercial ven. financing on big Industrial projects, growth of tax-exempt financing for housing, tuns, from last -foal chains to bar and But businessmen increasingly saw reve. hospitals, pollution control and Industrial de• grills, are leaping on the Industrial bondwa• nue bonds as a gual way to finance small velopment. P. " gun. In Minnesota. where local -government commercial ventures where borrowing It also reflects a big Increase In revenue tardus floated $617 million of such Issues last "C1{s fell within the $5 million limit. Moan- bonds, those whose Interest Is paid by reve• year, tax-free bonds were employed to build time. Many stales began to broaden the cor• nue from a specific project rather than from snppxer club;, shopping centers, bowling al. Poste purposes eligible for lax-freeJbanc, general tax revenue. According to be Pub- leys, bank branches, dentist offices and Ing; of the 47 states that permit tax-free in. Ile Securities Assocladon, $71.7 billion In I racquet clubs -kinds of private , projects du atrial bonds, about 25 now allow sales of revenue bonds were sold tut year. Mr. Pe- ,•J) nLany ptoPle think hardly deserve public such binds for commercial I,opposed to tersen predicts that revenue bonds will ae• subsidy. - manufacturing) purposes. Further spurring count for about 759E of the dollar volume of i::•;" hi a still -unpublished report. the Con es• the trend was a appetite municipal•bond sales this year. gr growing public a btllc for s eating up an old debate siomd Hudgcr Office concludes that the vol • tax-free yields This trend Ih and, In 1978, an Decrease to{:;?;:.,,? um! Of "sncdl" Issues of Industrial -develop. $10 "Ilion In the federal ceiiing for lax -free about use of tax-free financing for any kind '• ' nx•nr Gods-issnxl for pNjects under Slo Industrial financings. ' of business project. CYtticscontend that tax. L million-s'Iarrd to $7 billion In 1979, double The resiting explosion in the use of free financing long has served to pulp jobs 1 B,y 1178 figure and far above previous esti. industrial - development bonds prompts out of older Northern Induslrlai cities by I i14•Ills' ChilrgCS That they are again bring overusedsubsidizing plant constntcdon In suburbs Revenue LOSS or nils esal. And al a lime o! worry about and the Sun Belt. They also say It grants an federal deficits, Interest In'new• curbs is res- unfair advantage to certain businesses over The govrnment "is conceMod about the Ing bob' In Congress and In the Carter ad• competitors that must borrow at higher, tax• las of revenues and the on [is expan• -able rates. 51011" of these lax•free-bond sales, says John ministration. :...._._, Samuels, Treasury tax legislative counsel. Elmore County Case In the case o! commercial projects, oppo- nents say tax-free financing isn't neeled.�_;.1'I The Treasury estimates that sales of Indus- In their investicongressional crit. "You don't put a K mart In a community investigations. congressi triad bonds in small Issues -those used lost are focusing on aggressive tactics em• where there isn't the population to support f cidefly for commercial projects -will cost It ployed by large corporations and Investment it." says one congressional aide. "Md If the t as couch as $2 billion in lost revenue in the bankers seeking to drum up sales of tax-free people are there, you're going to build It t � fiscal year that hasjusl begun. industrial bonds. In Elmore County, Ala., anyway." Critics also contend that the trend Is for instance, a lawyer for McDonald's Corp. e¢reManning Washington ding out IradRlonal users of tax-exempt approached county officials to set up a local berruwbtg, driving up costs for stales, cities industrial boaml. He even drew up the legal But Tam Walkor, director of the Ohio De - states. lard governments' that must raise funds papers free of charge. velopment Fitiancing Comnnlss,on, a stale for rxuls or sewers. ',Every lime a bank The hoard was created, and its first or. l x1v, says that high Interest rates have buys an industrial -development bond, that's der of business was to authorize the sale of '"r"de tax-free bonds "Bre olid a municipal bind they don't buy,.. says Cad• toad for man y game fn Y up to S1 million of tax-exempt bonds fora Y businesses 111 search of ale Horowitz, partner In charge of municipal hleLonald's restaurant In the town of W� funds. With its night.credll policies, h f binds at Salomon Brothers. tumpka. Clnrles Cousins, an opponent of argues, "Washington has Laken the money But driepurrs es Indureply Vial bonds for tax-free industrial bonds who served briefly markets away from us, like a loaf of bread, Nnumrrdai purposes reply !hal such Issues on tab Elmore County body, complains of and now the trying to take away the uld•n serve the public Interest. FasFfaxd what he terms"fntertorence of McDonald's °„ hfr• Walker adds that many rr stands and shopping centers, they say, bone- N^"•:r• fit local communities in much the same wayatnrney." glomal' investment banks are surviving In °' as large factories do, b Edward Allen, the McDonald's lawyer, part because of Industrfaldevelopmenl �'.p.,,."` R y generating Jobs and concedes that be resolution "creating the bonds. 'hIX revenue' board, was drawn up by us," but he adds The jobs Issue Is stressed b It was o l agencies in the 1930sdflo that Y hUchaol K•' "-"� state and local agencies first tried floating that this Is a common practice. County o(fl• Gibbons, a Palmer In Mcibnald, & Co., a rax•frtt bonds to help corporations finance ciak don't appear upset about It. But h(elvin Cleveland -based securities firm that under• new factories. Because the Interest on the Cooper, the director of Alabama's state eth• writes tax-free bond issues for the similarly bonds Is exempt from federal taxes (it can Irs commtsslon, says that he "strongly" ad. named (but unrelated) hamburger chain. � be exempt from stile and local taxes, too); ,sect county offldals against the Icgal•work Says Mr. Gibbons; "Every time a hfcDon• the tants are sold at lower Interest rates "tnngumenI. McDonald's says It didn't spe• aid's restaurant goes up, 70 people who are r. thin taxable bonds. This provision reduces cncally underlie the free legal work, marginally employable get jobs." Store chains that Ilse Industrial -develop. With the Treasury �"-"'•••:� borrowing costs for private companies, p• ry expressing alarm over which dna got a backdoor subsidy. AI• mont bonds apparently are becoming sensl• tax losses- battle lines could soon be formin In Washington s ��....:' :•• . though a guvymment agency Issues N° five afoul the topic. Donald Horwitz, the gt n over new moves to curb sales n°' tends, II is the credit of the company that Is general counsel for McDonald's, says thatt of. Industrial -development bonds. A House behind them. the company's use of the financing device Is Ways and hicans oversight subcommittee ' In the case of many smaller companies, "minor overall" and will amount to only f20 plans hearings on the Issue later this year. such tends never reach the public market. million this year. He adds that be believes One capital' Iolldcal operative who Is Instead, they are simply bought by localhf:;Doteald's Is being unfairly singled out. firm y in favor of the bonds Is Richard Vi. bulks and other lenders. This form of mar. Changing Role of flotx,s gllerie, a leading fund raiser for conserva• hive causes. }!e Is planning to use 57 million --" - K mart Corp„ asked about Its use of tax• of tax-free bonds floated by a local agency • free Industrial bonds for commercial par- to help build a new headquarters for his dl• poses, says It doesn't collect figures on such tecl•mali operation In Fairfax County, Va„ financings bccausy stores are put up by IG outside SYuhington. A1r, Vlguerle says V Is t cal' developers. The Congresslonal Midget clxnrNtted to curb,,, rib spread of the fel. Office says K mart has opened rA retail oral government Into L;eople's Ilves. Never., stores In 18 states over the put five years thdem. he bods. "Lim not goln, to cut off with the help of fl27 million of tax-exempt my nose to spite my (ace" by rejecting the Industrial -development bonds, . federal tax subsidy, (Dow Jones & Co., publisher of this news. paper, owns a W. Interest In a new news• print mill near Richmond, Va.. that was II• .. • ..._... . noticed In part by tax-free Industrial bonds.) .. The controversy over use of Industrial—•---..._.___..._.._._.._...._._._......_._._..,�., bonds for commercial puToses highlights Vic rapidly growing role of the municipal. Y bond market In raising funds for the private seely. "xlunlrtnat Mid. 1° JORM MICR LAB• . CEDAR RAPIDS - DES MOINES ,� E a ]L e^ iY �'00�] a •.t i�... 5 p aYr 2;9` e _ �y•�x04a9 . Iq+ of y.MyJ�ox p•.J '� ;� � , fi L � CC S p .. •. . v mY f1� 'e� d OvE��j: �.'.. •°o L 'da m u u y e. T 'O I p.� b v] E •p O Y at �. tl CIY v y u r u - e i.p..s..TFo,• � o;'^oY�moo�u'aQNil 0'd .� G cL p,'L .. rJ' pCF> s mP'+7 Y yY rj %�'T3$ i mm$:'• Y '8 i ] V. O Y a n O u..�a5p N .O JrueO.. .m�tJ' Nr�C� Oy�, 5 ° u'E o.5'u �•' 3? Y .5 5d o e3- P a y �'tJ u C = Y %J ° u L cC 5'QL.Za co.Qv`duaU.% 7:G? Y y. A C QQ$ev9 ma> �l u g. Uii" Y VF L. ��a ].00 .%. E-5 C ut; g ea p .�. °u y� � u � n $ F .Y. a c'g � c e °Or9i'� >c > o a 9 o a'Cp� u °u x �/ 0 we �x°T�$o a.S OE'''a ��IAio' P. E- .— E... 1 v7L 'S a Y b Z ON6Vp.c5 '°sY'yegL'O.i pY p ie 0-2 1 p 0. t 3 u. U" •� O"r9 T p._-iu�`V•. 2 a 5 •Y r� °0dxtlVCL. 0'° 4$ma JmS�eiJ YE .°.'SFJ Y' EYY .rBp 5 Yr 0% «. y O O V:.• 096I'If1S3HW3Id3S'AYQSNf1H:1.'QH0O31ISM3NA'uV4 G. Y•. `• Yyg9I y..7 prFMaE ''nF ��Ej i..'i.•..V.YE•> pi W '•"Cupp°yyC,T, .o.l7bO° ��$r5 VU o']is $�o:�d•$ .5oud.o L. .a.�L..IJ-;�>ci:. e tla.5y ;j v sa Ynoo�mp�o q^ '•S ua:2 ••:0 ,°'-o-•-cYo > YY V•I, mE g]9u y•°Y 6�0 -UE O rr�5 °S' �pw'dFF' yY .°O� RE Fac ti .e'•5a� .:l�l..�u yy�C�" G g nm ��aF1 E0 Yiy T:, o`°^S r'C O S o n a r _p C •0 11 a pu G r •. 6 L � E �' r •. Y.Y O_`Yb�S.y G�. ,..m'�.'Y\i•r.:pbidp•'°°y 9 T V 9 ^�T ; I l••VN!5'•�°rE aOi•Y•••YE'Y'�-Y9L•�� V�C �r1•1.Y.2y rOY"I�'t'a�� 6 �>.."'�JC uyY •... u•o �•e1vu y..C 7 000L>9.Lk'oy YGCY Y NOY c �pO N .. .3 •C B.9 LY- Y Y O + Y � 5{�0 al APO ppy 'OppOUY,�'rrJ7Y�°'LF•'O°,4 Y��'.0. 4pV°�L��C�?Tygs SY? -•� �` NrrYOa�b FpG .:1r..4 Ya p TVI yt'9''..L°LOa SOU-- O aaSN°T•Yy Op.uaOuV. $uYU M,yYO \ wc1.:ue° Cuu >uE Fp EYYL L' ��u•� U rO9 u m 11 t `v u 9Vw Ylo�d _.S= Y u ._` a n u y _ r e IES— gg Np oa.5o�'z0 Y. pc ^ EE�5�9e NMS. $u qx•a a93oo>PYi Ow' °N N�{3T .1 �0 E!E >�VQ 9�fl o 0 r ^w�YdY6u mYuo,$$s9x-m °ICIFjuE..8^CuW auTu um 10 05 um lr//�1 'NyyIOxVy. FeeQ^A^•u.^Y. q�..L°uo•anl:3..SOa `mP•7a:.$°7 �•.. vpvy R•O G ° Yuu°G.'o�00. EE '°0 Y'Muo 2„eg5� r YNsp9v.5io�xJe$..'a7 g 'O,99 .0'Yg $.� Y.; Y� Y e v.9 Y ..S.91 G4��5� ry 09GI'11H39W3.Ld39'AvavnH.L'GUOO9H9AA NA'HVQ JORM MICR(?LAtl CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES THIS IS AN INFORMAL SUMMARY OF SOME PRELIMINARY FINDINGS q OF A CONGRE: INAL BUDGET OFFICE STUDY. IT yFGULD NOT BE I'9 t 1 QUOTED FROM, xEFERRED T0, OR CITED AS AN OFF_ 1w CHO a DOCUMENT. CBO STUDIES UNDERGO EXTENSIVE INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL REVIEW BEFORE PUBLICATION. ANY INFORMATION IN 1 THIS SUMMARY SHOULD THUS BE VIEWED AS PRELIMINARY AND SUBJECT T'0 CHANGE. CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE STUDY OF INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT BONDS: SOME PRELIMINARY FINDINGS The Congressional Budget Office is currently completing a study of industrial revenue bonds (IRBs). The report -- undertaken at the request of the Oversight Subcommittee of the U.S. House of Representatives Ways and Means Committee -- covers the volume and extent of IRB use, the relationship between IRBs and other economic development programs, and the effects of IRBs on both investment decisions and federal revenues. In keeping with CBO policy, the study will present a variety of alternatives for Congressional consideration, but it will make no recommendations. Some of the preliminary findings are as follows: Small issue IRBs, which provide tax-exempt financing up to a maximum 'of $10 million over a six-year period, are being used in much greater quantity and for a much wider variety of projects than official sources had estimated. Based on data from the Public Securities Association (PSA), the Federal Reserve Board estimated that in 1979 sales of small issue and pollution control bonds amounted to $3.8 billion. CBO estimates that these bond sales amounted to nearly $10 billion, with small issues accounting for $7 billion of that amount. The reason for the discrepancy is that most IRB transactions are private placements with local banks or other lenders and are rarely reported beyond the state or local level. C80's data on IRB sales are based on reports from state and MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES -A- TEXTNAME: preliminary (R)P: 02 I:10 n local agencies. These, unlike other sources, include most private placements. Even so, the most that CBO can claim is that its estimates more accurately reflect the current level of IRB sales. Since a few states had no information and some others had only incomplete reports, the real volume of IRB sales remains a mystery. In the past five years the use of IRBs has grown rapidly. Between 1978 and 1979 alone, it doubled. Several developments account for the large increase in sales last year. - First, the increase in capital expenditure limits from $5 million to $10 million made larger bond issues possible and, perhaps more importantly, increased the number of facilities eligible for IRB financing. - Secondly, the savings in interest costs made possible by INS were relatively greater last year than they had been at any other time in the 1970s. In 1979 and in the first quarter of 1980, the spread between tax-exempt and taxable interest rates was wider than usual, making IRBs more attractive than ever. This, coupled with soaring interest rates, greatly increased the popularity of the bonds. - Finally, although their use in the past was largely for manufacturing, more and more states have permitted IRBs to be used for commercial ventures. f f i -A- TEXTNAME: preliminary (R)P: 02 I:10 n local agencies. These, unlike other sources, include most private placements. Even so, the most that CBO can claim is that its estimates more accurately reflect the current level of IRB sales. Since a few states had no information and some others had only incomplete reports, the real volume of IRB sales remains a mystery. In the past five years the use of IRBs has grown rapidly. Between 1978 and 1979 alone, it doubled. Several developments account for the large increase in sales last year. - First, the increase in capital expenditure limits from $5 million to $10 million made larger bond issues possible and, perhaps more importantly, increased the number of facilities eligible for IRB financing. - Secondly, the savings in interest costs made possible by INS were relatively greater last year than they had been at any other time in the 1970s. In 1979 and in the first quarter of 1980, the spread between tax-exempt and taxable interest rates was wider than usual, making IRBs more attractive than ever. This, coupled with soaring interest rates, greatly increased the popularity of the bonds. - Finally, although their use in the past was largely for manufacturing, more and more states have permitted IRBs to be used for commercial ventures. At the same time that the use of revenue bond financing is increasing, so is public concern about them. Industrial revenue bond �96� MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB - CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES - f.... f i At the same time that the use of revenue bond financing is increasing, so is public concern about them. Industrial revenue bond �96� MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB - CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES - f.... :TNAME: preliminary (R)P: 03 financing is a means of using federal funds to subsidize private investment. IRBs make it possible for business to borrow at lower costs n because interest on the bonds is exempt from federal taxation. The presumption behind the tax-exempt status of the bonds is, of course, that they serve a public purpose. Throughout the history of the use of IRBs, however, the public purpose has been vague. Federal legislation sets capital expenditure limits for small issue INS, but contains no other guidelines, leaving a vacuum that the states have attempted to fill. Their efforts have resulted in a wide variety of practices. On the one extreme are the few states that prohibit the use of INS. On the other, are the states that permit IRB financing for any legal business regardless of purpose or location. Creating jobs is the most common justification for using INS. Rarely, however, is the question of whether or not the same jobs would have been created with conventional financing raised. And only in a few cases do issuing localities have policies that in any way limit the use of IRBs to areas with higher than average unemployment or lower than average per capita income. Today46 states actively use IRBs. As the number of states using IRBs has grown, so has the variety of projects benefiting from tax-exempt financing. Although federal law never prohibited any specific uses of INS, state enabling legislation tended to be narower. As of 1970, most states used IRBs only for manufacturing and closely related facilities, such as warehouses and distribution centers for manufactured (and MICROFILMED BY JORM MIC R+LA9 CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES l :ll a TEXTNAME: preliminary (R)P: 04 I:12 sometimes for agricultural) products. Beginning in the early 1970s, state and local officials, brokerage houses, commercial banks and businesses became aware of the possibilities of financing virtually any enterprise with IRBs and pushed for amendments to state enabling legislation that would permit them to take maximum advantage of federal law. Pennsylvania was one of the first states to do so. The state passed legislation permitting IRB use for manufacturing in 1967 and amended it to include commercial projects in 1971. The trend has continued ever since. As of the spring of 1980, some 26 states permitted IRB use for commercial and industrial projects. By summer, another five states had either passed or were about to pass similar legislation. In some communities, . local merchants have opposed the use of tax-exempt financing for commercial ventures. Since retailers usually compete in narrower markets than manufacturers, they are more immediately threatened by any special advantages that their competitors might enjoy. They are also in a better position to organize and to levy political pressure. In July 1980, more than 2,200 voters in Ravalli County, Montana, signed petitions called for a referendum on the use of $4 million in IRBs to construct a shopping center, with K -Mart as a principal tenant. Local merchants, who had never benefited from tax-exempt funding, called the County Commission's approval of the bonds "unfair" and succeeded in putting the issue on the November general election ballot. Similar problems have arisen in places as far apart as Wetumpka, Alabama, and Dalles, Oregon. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES /9166 rEXVN ME: preliminary (R)P: 05 1:13 , Nearly half of the states that permit IDBS put virtually no restrictions on their use. This, coupled with new information about the volume of bond sales, has raised the issue of the public purpose of the projects. Most federal programs to help business target their assistance either to distressed urban or rural areas, which may be less attractive to investors, or to smaller and riskier businesses, which often have difficulty raising capital. IRBs, on the other hand, are now being used to finance every kind of enterprise from "ma and pa" grocery stores to multinational corporations and every kind of activity from manufacturing plants to country clubs. The uses have cone to include department stores,. supermarkets, fast food chains, automobile dealerships, doctors and .dentists offices, funeral hones, movie theatres, skating 'rinks, bowling alleys, tennis and racquetball clubs, golf courses, health spas, hotels, motels, and ski lodges. These facilities may be located in distressed communities or in affluent areas. In some states concern about the public purpose of IRBs has resulted in less permissive policies. Some 15 states still restrict the use of bonds to manufacturing and closely related facilities. A few states permit tax-exempt financing for commercial ventures only if the projects are in distressed areas. In Massachusetts, for example, these projects are restricted to specifically designated "commercial area revitalization districts" in older cities. This permits the use of IRBs in conjunction with projects that benefit from Urban Development Action Grants. Finally, some states use guarantees, general obligation bonds, or MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LA9 CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES f i II I. i I i i I I rEXVN ME: preliminary (R)P: 05 1:13 , Nearly half of the states that permit IDBS put virtually no restrictions on their use. This, coupled with new information about the volume of bond sales, has raised the issue of the public purpose of the projects. Most federal programs to help business target their assistance either to distressed urban or rural areas, which may be less attractive to investors, or to smaller and riskier businesses, which often have difficulty raising capital. IRBs, on the other hand, are now being used to finance every kind of enterprise from "ma and pa" grocery stores to multinational corporations and every kind of activity from manufacturing plants to country clubs. The uses have cone to include department stores,. supermarkets, fast food chains, automobile dealerships, doctors and .dentists offices, funeral hones, movie theatres, skating 'rinks, bowling alleys, tennis and racquetball clubs, golf courses, health spas, hotels, motels, and ski lodges. These facilities may be located in distressed communities or in affluent areas. In some states concern about the public purpose of IRBs has resulted in less permissive policies. Some 15 states still restrict the use of bonds to manufacturing and closely related facilities. A few states permit tax-exempt financing for commercial ventures only if the projects are in distressed areas. In Massachusetts, for example, these projects are restricted to specifically designated "commercial area revitalization districts" in older cities. This permits the use of IRBs in conjunction with projects that benefit from Urban Development Action Grants. Finally, some states use guarantees, general obligation bonds, or MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LA9 CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES i ,TEXTNAKc: preliminary (R)p `6 1:14 mortgage insurance to back INS that are issued on behalf of smaller or riskier firms. Cennorri....♦ ..L._. . nue bonds to assist businesses that could not on their- own' obtainla IRBfinancing, is a leading example. The costs to the public of using IRBs include more than foregone federal income taxes. In most, but not all states, the bonds are also exempt from state income taxes. In addition, some states exempt IRB -financed facilities from local property and sales taxes. Finally, most economists agree that new issues of tax-exempt revenue bonds drive up the costs of state and local borrowing for traditional public purposes, such as roads, schools, and sewers. •,In presenting options for Congressional consideration, CBO will examine both existing state policies and other alternatives. These will range from raising capital expenditure limits on IRBs, on the one hand, to doing away with their tax exemption, on the other. While some members of Congres have expressed concern about the growing use of tax-exempt financing, future policy changes are impossible to predict. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS - DES MOINES / 966 I I I �I i \1\ I I` s k ,TEXTNAKc: preliminary (R)p `6 1:14 mortgage insurance to back INS that are issued on behalf of smaller or riskier firms. Cennorri....♦ ..L._. . nue bonds to assist businesses that could not on their- own' obtainla IRBfinancing, is a leading example. The costs to the public of using IRBs include more than foregone federal income taxes. In most, but not all states, the bonds are also exempt from state income taxes. In addition, some states exempt IRB -financed facilities from local property and sales taxes. Finally, most economists agree that new issues of tax-exempt revenue bonds drive up the costs of state and local borrowing for traditional public purposes, such as roads, schools, and sewers. •,In presenting options for Congressional consideration, CBO will examine both existing state policies and other alternatives. These will range from raising capital expenditure limits on IRBs, on the one hand, to doing away with their tax exemption, on the other. While some members of Congres have expressed concern about the growing use of tax-exempt financing, future policy changes are impossible to predict. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS - DES MOINES / 966 I I �I i , I City of Iowa CIC) MEMORANDUM DATE: October 9, 1980 TO: Neal Berlin, City Manager E Council Members FROM: Beverly Horton, Animal Control RE: Revised Animal Control Ordinance Attached is the revised animal control ordinance for Your review. The following is a summary of the major changes. A. Revised licensing provisions to help make pet licens- ing simple and easily understood for pet owners. It Provides a calendar year licensing system which includes incentives to comply. It is anticipated that this system will produce an increase in revenues through greater compliance. B. The responsibility for public hearings of vicious animals has been transferred from the City Council to the office of the City Manager. C. The animal welfare section has been strengthened through specific definitions establishing standards for basic care. D. This ordinance establishes a registration procedure for "Guard Dogs" which is of importance to the Fire and Police Departments. E. Finally, it prohibits the use of the steel jaw leg- hold trap in the City limits. This is included due to numerous complaints and the many dangers they pose to pet animals and children. Items which have not been included but are suggested for Council opinion are: Reduced license fees for senior citizens, E Permits or registration for livestock and exotic animal owners. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAS F CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES 1967 i i i� 4 . i DRAFT ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 7, ANIMALS AND FO11L, OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF IOWA CITY ' SECTION 1. PURPOSE. The purpose of this amendment is to revise the gg thetreatment,control and licensingng animals ofof animals within the City, regarding M SECTION 2. AMENDMENT. Chapter 7 of the Code of Ordinances is hereby amended to read as follows: ARTICLE 1. IN GENERAL Sec. 7-1. Reporting disease. Any person having knowledge of the presence of any disease among animals capable of being communicated to man, shall immediately report that fact, together with the street and number of the premises at which the animals are kept, to the county health officer. Sec. 7-2. Cruelty to animals. No person shall abuse, torture, torment, mutilate, overwork, overload, beat or unnecessarily kill any animal; or fail to provide any animal with adequate food, water, exercise, sanitation, space, indoor and outdoor I shelter, or veterinary care; or abandon; or carry or cause to be carried any animal in or upon any vehicle in a cruel manner; or commit any other act, or omission by which unjustifiable pain, distress, suffering, or death is caused or permitted to any animal. The terms of this section are defined as follows: 1. ABANDON shall mean to cease to provide control over, and shelter, hat such cae custody, andter for physiicaln animal controlwOfhout suchhavinganimalphasrovidedbe nttransferredrto, another person, with the knowledge and consent of that person. 2. ADEQUATE FOOD shall mean providing at suitable intervals of not more I than twenty-four (24) hours if the dietary requirements of the the species so require, a quantity of wholesome food stuff, suitable for receptacle physical condition a le or container, sufficiient to maintain an adequate leveleof nutrition for such animal. ! 3. ADEQUATE OUTDOOR SHELTER shall mean a structurally sound and weather-proof shelter which provides access to shade from direct sunlight and regress from exposure to weather conditions. 1 4• ADEQUATE INDOOR SHELTER shall mean a vnd illuminated facility, sufficiently regulated byr heating�ortcooling to protect the animal from extremes of temperature, and to provide for its health and comfort. 1967 MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES iA Ordinance No. Page 2 5. ADEQUATE SANITATION shall mean periodic cleaning or sanitizing of primary enclosures and housing facilities to remove excreta and other waste materials and dirt, so as to minimize health hazards, flies, or odors. 6. ADEQUATE SPACE shall mean primary enclosures and housing facilities shall be constructed and maintained so as to provide sufficient space to allow each animal to make normal postural and social adjustments with adequate freedom of movement to maintain physical condition. Inadequate space may be indicated by evidence of mal -nutrition, poor condition, debility, stress, or abnormal behavior patterns. 7. ADEQUATE VETERINARY CARE shall mean that a sick, diseased, or injured animal shall be provided with a proper program of care by a veterinarian, or humanely euthanized. 8. ADEQUATE WATER shall mean reasonable access to a supply of clean, fresh, potable water, provided in a sanitary manner. If potable water is not accessible to the animal at all times, it shall be provided daily, for such duration and of sufficient quantity as necessary for the animal's health and comfort. Sec. 7-3. Poisoned meat. No person shall expose any poisoned meat or other poisoned substances on public or private property where the same may be taken by any human being or domestic animal. Sec. 7-4. Livestock running at large. No person shall permit or suffer any cattle, horses, goats, swine, sheep, fowl or other livestock under his or her control to run at large. The City shall cause such animals, except pet animals, to be impounded in an appropriate place at the cost of the owner. Sec. 7-5. Traps. No person shall trap or attempt to trap any animal with other than a humane, live trap. Excepted from this prohibition are instant kill traps for the purpose of small rodent pest control. Sec. 7-6. Disposition of animals on public property. No person shall sell, offer for sale, barter, give away or dispose of any live animal upon any public property. Sec. 7-7. Animals as prizes. No person shall offer to give or give any live animal as a gift or prize for any contest or other competition, or as a business inducement or promotion. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LA9 CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES Ordinance No. i Page 3 a Sec. 7-8. Animal defined. n t For the purposes of this chapter an animal shall mean any living creature, domestic or wild, except a human being. Illi Secs. 7-9 - 7-16. Reserved. !js 1 ARTICLE II. PETS. DIVISION 1. GENERALLY. Sec. 7-17. Definitions. The following definitions shall apply when used in this article, unless the context indicates otherwise: 1. DEFILEMENT shall mean to foul, dirty, pollute, or make filthy, either by the pet animal's body or wastes or by the animal carrying or - -- dragging any foul material. 2. GUARD/ATTACK DOG shall mean a dog which is trained to attack persons upon the command of its master or custodian, or upon the actions of an individual. 3. KENNEL or CATTERY shall mean a place maintained for the business of boarding, raising, rearing, training, or sale of dogs and cats. 4. LEASH shall mean a rope, line, thong, chain, or other similar restraint not more than six (6) feet in length which is of sufficient strength to hold the animal in check. 5. MOLEST shall include not only biting and scratching, but also any annoyance, interference with, or meddling with any person so as to trouble or harm him/her. 6. MUNICIPAL POUND shall mean any public animal shelter or pound i established or maintained by the city which may include any private or charitable organization or facility leased by the city or with whom the city has a contractual agreement for impoundment services. 7. OWNER shall, in addition to its ordinary meaning, include any person who keeps or harbors an animal. 8. PET ANIMALS shall include all warm-blooded animals, except birds, animals of the equine species, and those raised for food purposes, within the city limits. 9. PRIVATE PROPERTY shall mean all buildings and other property owned by a private person. It shall include buildings, yards, and service and parking areas. i MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LA9 CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES j N Ordinance No. Page 4 n, 10. PUBLIC PROPERTY shall mean buildings and other property owned or dedicated to the use of the city, the state, Johnson County, Iowa, or the United States government, wherein the authorized representative has granted the city jurisdiction thereof, or any governmental subdivision of the city, state, county, or U.S. government, or any governmental organization established by the city, state, county or U.S. government. Such property shall include but not be limited to buildings, grounds, yards, street rights-of-way, walks, bicycle paths, easements, parks, service areas, open areas, athletic and recreational areas, riverbanks, parking areas and ramps, boulevards, and any other real estate owned by a governmental unit. 11. VETERINARIAN shall mean a person duly licensed by the state to practice veterinary medicine. 12. VETERINARY HOSPITAL shall mean an establishment regularly maintained and operated by a veterinarian for the diagnosis and treatment of diseases and injuries to animals and which may board animals. Sec. 7-18. Owner's responsibility. The owner of a pet animal shall be responsible for the obtaining of licenses and the care and control of any such animal owned by him/her as defined in section 7-19 of this article. The owner shall be prima facie responsible for any violation of Section 7-20 of this article by any animal owned by him/her. Sec. 7-19. Nuisances. The following acts and circumstances are hereby declared to be nuisances and therefore prohibited: 1. The keeping of a pet animal or animals on private property in such number or in such manner that allows for the accumulation of solid waste of such animal which becomes a detriment to or menace to the health of the animal. 2. Allowing any dog to habitually bay or bark or any cat to habitually screech, yell or make a sound of any kind or nature for prolonged periods in such manner as to unreasonably disturb the peace and quiet of the vicinity. 3. Allowing a pet animal to cause any damage or defilement to public or private property. 4. Allowing a pet animal to molest any person on public or private property who has a legitimate reason to be thereon. 5. Allowing a pet animal to molest or kill wildlife, birds or domestic animals on public or private property. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOIRES /967 Ordinance No ^ Page 5 I Sec. 7-20. Prohibitions and requirements. a. At large. No pet animal shall be found at large within the city at any time. A properly licensed animal shall not be deemed at large if: i I. It is on the premises of the owner; or I 2. It is on the premises of another person with the knowledge and � consent of that person; or 3. It is under the control of a person competent to restrain the animal, either by leash or properly restrained within a motor vehicle, or enclosed within a structure. b. Notwithstanding the provisions of subsection (a), any pet animal shall be deemed at large at any time when attacking persons, domestic animals, destroying property, or on any public property except when under restraint as set out in Paragraph (3) of subsection (a). Furthermore, any female pet in heat shall be deemed at large at any. time except: I. When housed in a building which is completely enclosed; or 2. When housed in a veterinary hospital or boarding kennel licensed or registered with the State of Iowa; or 3. When on the premises of the owner, provided the area on which such animal is located is completely enclosed by a fence or other structure having a height of at least sixty (60) inches; or 4. When under the control of a person competent to restrain the animal, either by leash or properly restrained within a motor vehicle. C. Private property. No pet animal shall be taken, allowed, or per- mitted on private property not owned by the owner of the animal without the permission of the person owning such property or the person in charge thereof. d. Food establishments. No pet animal shall be allowed, taken, or permitted on or in any building, store, restaurant, or tavern where food or food products are sold, prepared, or dispensed to people. other than the owners thereof. This provision shall not apply to property wherein food is sold in stands or shelters such as fairs or circus carnivals or the like, when the owner or person in charge of the grounds generally allows animals on the premises. e. Tying animals. No pet animal or livestock shall be tied by any person to a utility pole, parking meter, building, structure, fence, MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES I Ordinance No ^ Page 5 I Sec. 7-20. Prohibitions and requirements. a. At large. No pet animal shall be found at large within the city at any time. A properly licensed animal shall not be deemed at large if: i I. It is on the premises of the owner; or I 2. It is on the premises of another person with the knowledge and � consent of that person; or 3. It is under the control of a person competent to restrain the animal, either by leash or properly restrained within a motor vehicle, or enclosed within a structure. b. Notwithstanding the provisions of subsection (a), any pet animal shall be deemed at large at any time when attacking persons, domestic animals, destroying property, or on any public property except when under restraint as set out in Paragraph (3) of subsection (a). Furthermore, any female pet in heat shall be deemed at large at any. time except: I. When housed in a building which is completely enclosed; or 2. When housed in a veterinary hospital or boarding kennel licensed or registered with the State of Iowa; or 3. When on the premises of the owner, provided the area on which such animal is located is completely enclosed by a fence or other structure having a height of at least sixty (60) inches; or 4. When under the control of a person competent to restrain the animal, either by leash or properly restrained within a motor vehicle. C. Private property. No pet animal shall be taken, allowed, or per- mitted on private property not owned by the owner of the animal without the permission of the person owning such property or the person in charge thereof. d. Food establishments. No pet animal shall be allowed, taken, or permitted on or in any building, store, restaurant, or tavern where food or food products are sold, prepared, or dispensed to people. other than the owners thereof. This provision shall not apply to property wherein food is sold in stands or shelters such as fairs or circus carnivals or the like, when the owner or person in charge of the grounds generally allows animals on the premises. e. Tying animals. No pet animal or livestock shall be tied by any person to a utility pole, parking meter, building, structure, fence, MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES Ordinance No. Page 6 .n sign,tree, shrub, bush, or other object on public property, or tied on private property without the consent of the owner or person in charge thereof, or tied in such a manner as to block access to a public sidewalk or street. f. Solid waste removal. Any person who shall walk a pet animal on public or private property shall provide for the disposal of the solid waste material excreted by the animal by immediate removal of the waste. g. Exceptions. The provisions of this section shall not apply to dogs used to guide the visually impaired while such dogs are acting in such capacity. Sec. 7-21. Vicious animals. a. It shall be unlawful for any person to harbor or keep a vicious animal within the city. An animal is deemed to be vicious when it shall have attacked or bitten any person without provocation, or when propensity to attack or bite persons shall exist and such propensity is known to the owner, or ought reasonably be known to the owner thereof. This subsection shall not apply to guard and/or attack dogs, providing adequate safeguards are established to protect those persons legally on the premises, and the dog is registered as a guard/attack dog with the city. b. If any animal is accused as being vicious, as defined in subsection manager whether large oPrivate geror his/her may setapublipublic hearing h ng oncthe destruction of such animal. Pending such public hearing, the animal shall be impounded in the municipal shelter or, upon request by the owner, at a veterinary hospital at the owner's expense. Should the animal be held at a veterinary hospital, release of said animal without written authorization of the shelter supervisor is prohibited. C. The public hearing shall be conducted pursuant to the Iowa City Administrative Code. d. If the city manager or his/her designee(s) determine that the animal is a vicious animal and that the owner has failed to restrain such animal reasonably and that it is in the public interest to destroy such animal, the animal shall be destroyed in a humane manner after five days unless the determination is appealed to a court of competent jurisdiction. Sec. 7-22. Shelter or pound. a. Any public or municipal pound or shelter established and maintained by the city shall be conducted and operated by the animal control personnel, under the supervision, direction and control of the city manager. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES i i i j Ordinance No. Page 6 .n sign,tree, shrub, bush, or other object on public property, or tied on private property without the consent of the owner or person in charge thereof, or tied in such a manner as to block access to a public sidewalk or street. f. Solid waste removal. Any person who shall walk a pet animal on public or private property shall provide for the disposal of the solid waste material excreted by the animal by immediate removal of the waste. g. Exceptions. The provisions of this section shall not apply to dogs used to guide the visually impaired while such dogs are acting in such capacity. Sec. 7-21. Vicious animals. a. It shall be unlawful for any person to harbor or keep a vicious animal within the city. An animal is deemed to be vicious when it shall have attacked or bitten any person without provocation, or when propensity to attack or bite persons shall exist and such propensity is known to the owner, or ought reasonably be known to the owner thereof. This subsection shall not apply to guard and/or attack dogs, providing adequate safeguards are established to protect those persons legally on the premises, and the dog is registered as a guard/attack dog with the city. b. If any animal is accused as being vicious, as defined in subsection manager whether large oPrivate geror his/her may setapublipublic hearing h ng oncthe destruction of such animal. Pending such public hearing, the animal shall be impounded in the municipal shelter or, upon request by the owner, at a veterinary hospital at the owner's expense. Should the animal be held at a veterinary hospital, release of said animal without written authorization of the shelter supervisor is prohibited. C. The public hearing shall be conducted pursuant to the Iowa City Administrative Code. d. If the city manager or his/her designee(s) determine that the animal is a vicious animal and that the owner has failed to restrain such animal reasonably and that it is in the public interest to destroy such animal, the animal shall be destroyed in a humane manner after five days unless the determination is appealed to a court of competent jurisdiction. Sec. 7-22. Shelter or pound. a. Any public or municipal pound or shelter established and maintained by the city shall be conducted and operated by the animal control personnel, under the supervision, direction and control of the city manager. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES .. . Ordinance No. Page 7 b. It shall be the duty of the animal control officers to enforce the provisions of this chapter, and to impound any pet animal found running at large contrary to the provisions of this chapter. The animal control personnel shall provide adequate and wholesome food for animals impounded and shall provide careful and humane treatment toward such animals and shall provide for humane destruction of animals as provided in this chapter. C. The animal control personnel are designated as the official agents of the city for the purpose of issuing city dog and cat licenses and collecting fees therefor pursuant to the provisions of this chapter. d. As provided by law, the city may enter in a lease or contract with some regularly incorporated society organized for the express purpose of prevention of cruelty to animals for the use of its facilities for the restraining and impounding of animals consistent with the provisions in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section. Section 7-23. Releasing or molesting animals. No person, except the owner of a pet animal or his/her authorized agent, shall willfully open any door or gate on any private or public premises for the purpose of enticing or enabling any such animal to leave such private or public premises. Nor shall any person willfully molest, tease, provoke, or mistreat a pet animal. Sec. 7-24. Interference with agent. No person shall willfully interfere with, molest, or injure an agent of the city authorized to enforce the provisions of this article, or seek to release any animal properly in the custody of such authorized agent. Secs. 7-25 - 7-31. Reserved. DIVISION 2. IMPOUNDMENT Sec. 7-32. Authorized. Any pet animal found in violation of the provisions of this article may be impounded by the city in the pound or shelter as provided by section 7-22. Sec. 7-33. Registry of impounded animals. a. The person authorized to impound pet animals, upon receiving any pet animal pursuant to this chapter shall make a complete registration for such animal, entering the date, species, breed, color, and sex of such animal any tattoo number, and whether licensed. If such animal is licensed, he/she shall enter the name and address of the owner and the number of the license tag. MICROFILMED BY DORM MICR+LA6 CEDAR RAPIDS - DES MOINES Ordinance No Page 8 n b• The registry of impounded pet animals shall be available for I nspection during reasonable hours by the owners of animals not wearing the tag required by this article when impounded. Sec. 7-34. Notice to owner. Not later than two (2) days after the impounding of any pet animal, the owner, if known, shall be notified of such impoundment. Sec. 7-35. Redemption - Generally. The owner of any pet animal impounded pursuant to this chapter may reclaim such animal upon: proof of current license and rabies innoculation, payment of the redemption fee set by the city council, and payment of all costs and charges incurred by the city or the agency authorized by the city council to impound such pet animal, including the maintenance of such pet animal. Sec. 7-36. Redemption - Fees. Fees for the boarding of pet animals impounded at the municipal pound of the city shall be set by the city council. Impoundment charges shall also be set by the city council. The charges established pursuant to this section shall be in addition to any fine or penalty that may be enforced against the owner for violating the provisions of this chapter. Sec. 7-37. Redemption - Licensing and vaccination prerequisite to release of animals six months or older. If a pet six (6)"months of age or older which is unlicensed is impounded, the person to whom the animal is released shall purchase a license for such animal and show proof of current rabies vaccination or purchase a rabies vaccination receipt in order to obtain the release of the animal. Sec. 7-38. Redemption - Disposal upon owner's failure to redeem. It shall be the duty of the animal control personnel to keep all animals impounded pursuant to this article for a period of four (4) days after the owner has been notified as provided herein. If after four (4) days following receipt of notice person of by the owner either by certified mail or in the impounding of the owner's animal, the owner thereof has failed to claim and redeem any such impounded animal as provided in this article, such animal may be adopted, transferred to any state institution pursuant to the provisions and for the purposes of Chapter 351A of the Code of Iowa, or humanely killed and disposed of. Sec. 7-39. Confinement of animals suspected of having rabies when impounded; tests. Any pet animal which appears to be suffering from rabies when impounded shall be confined in the pound or a veterinary hospital for a period of MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LA6 CEDAR RAPIDS - DES MOINES /967 j 1 i Ordinance No Page 8 n b• The registry of impounded pet animals shall be available for I nspection during reasonable hours by the owners of animals not wearing the tag required by this article when impounded. Sec. 7-34. Notice to owner. Not later than two (2) days after the impounding of any pet animal, the owner, if known, shall be notified of such impoundment. Sec. 7-35. Redemption - Generally. The owner of any pet animal impounded pursuant to this chapter may reclaim such animal upon: proof of current license and rabies innoculation, payment of the redemption fee set by the city council, and payment of all costs and charges incurred by the city or the agency authorized by the city council to impound such pet animal, including the maintenance of such pet animal. Sec. 7-36. Redemption - Fees. Fees for the boarding of pet animals impounded at the municipal pound of the city shall be set by the city council. Impoundment charges shall also be set by the city council. The charges established pursuant to this section shall be in addition to any fine or penalty that may be enforced against the owner for violating the provisions of this chapter. Sec. 7-37. Redemption - Licensing and vaccination prerequisite to release of animals six months or older. If a pet six (6)"months of age or older which is unlicensed is impounded, the person to whom the animal is released shall purchase a license for such animal and show proof of current rabies vaccination or purchase a rabies vaccination receipt in order to obtain the release of the animal. Sec. 7-38. Redemption - Disposal upon owner's failure to redeem. It shall be the duty of the animal control personnel to keep all animals impounded pursuant to this article for a period of four (4) days after the owner has been notified as provided herein. If after four (4) days following receipt of notice person of by the owner either by certified mail or in the impounding of the owner's animal, the owner thereof has failed to claim and redeem any such impounded animal as provided in this article, such animal may be adopted, transferred to any state institution pursuant to the provisions and for the purposes of Chapter 351A of the Code of Iowa, or humanely killed and disposed of. Sec. 7-39. Confinement of animals suspected of having rabies when impounded; tests. Any pet animal which appears to be suffering from rabies when impounded shall be confined in the pound or a veterinary hospital for a period of MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LA6 CEDAR RAPIDS - DES MOINES /967 Ordinance No Page 9 not less than ten (10) days; and such animal or its carcass if it dies, shall be subject to such reasonable veterinary or pathological tests as the city determines; which tests, if any, shall be conducted at the expense of the owner. Secs. 7-40 - 7-46. Reserved. DIVISION 3. RABIES AND DISEASE CONTROL Sec. 7-47. Isolation and quarantine Of suspect animals. a. It shall be the duty of the person authorized to impound pet animals in the city to cause to be placed in isolation and under quarantine for observation for a minimum period of ten (10) days any such animal suspected of being infected with rabies or other diseases communicable to humans or any animal that has bitten or caused a skin abrasion upon any person in the city. l b. Such isolation and quarantine shall be either at the municipal pound authorized by the city or in a veterinary hospital, except that if such animal is properly licensed and is currently vaccinated against rabies it may be placed in the custody of the owner on the owner's premises during the isolation and quarantine period if the owner restheides owner'Isthe city. premises, litewillobetat the discretionquarantine of andunderauthorized the direct supervision of the city. C. The expense of isolation and quarantine at a veterinary hospital will be borne by the owner. If the animal is placed in isolation and under quarantine in the animal shelter authorized by the city, a charge to the owner, as set by resolution of the city council, shall be made. Every owner or person having possession, custody, or control of an animal which is known to be rabid or which has been bitten by an animal infected with rabies shall immediately report such fact to the city and shall have such animal placed in isolation and quarantine as directed by the city for such period as may be designated and at the expense of the owner. Sec. 7-48. Required reports. a. Physicians. It shall be the duty of every physician or other practitioner in the city to make written report to the city of the name and together address with such othersibitesns treated for linflicted b information as will assist i of rabies. b. Veterinarian. It shall be the duty of every veterinarian in the city to report to the city any diagnosis of rabies in an animal made by him/her or under his/her supervision. i i MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB 1 j! CEDAR RAPIDS - DES MOINES W Ordinance No. Page 10 C. Owners and others having knowledge of bites. It shall be the duty of the owner of any animal or any person having knowledge of such animal biting or causing a skin abrasion upon any person in the city to promptly report such fact to the city. Sec. 7-49. Proclamation. I!I Whenever it becomes necessary to safeguard the public from the dangers of I rabies, the city council may issue a proclamation ordering every owner of a pet animal to confine the same securely on the owner's premises at all times for such period of time as is deemed necessary. Secs. 7-50 - 7-56. Reserved. DIVISION 4. LICENSING AND VACCINATION Sec. 7-57. Licenses Required. a. Every owner of a dog or cat over the age of six months of age, or of a dog or cat under six months that is no longer with its dam, shall procure a city dog or cat license for each calendar year from the city before the first day of March of the calendar year for which the license is in effect, or within thirty days after such dog or cat reaches the age of six months of age, or if under six months of age and is no longer with its dam, or if brought into the city. b. After March 1st of each license year, delinquent license fees as determined by the City Council shall be assessed in addition to the annual license fee except in those cases where by reason of residence outside the corporate limits, age, or ownership, the dog or cat was not subject to licensing during the period from January 1st to the date of application for a license. In those cases where a dog or a cat becomes subject to the terms of this section after February 1st of any license year, the license fee shall become due and payable within thirty days after the date that such dog or cat becomes subject to the terms of this chapter. After thirty days, the owner shall pay the delinquent license fee of ($15) fifteen dollars in addition to the annual license fee. C. All licenses, regardless of date of issue, expire on December 31st of the year the license was in effect. d. The license fee for the license required under this division shall be set by resolution of the city council. e. At the time of making application for a city license, the owner shall furnish to the city a veterinarian's certificate showing that the dog or cat for which the license is sought has been vaccinated and that such vaccination has not expired. In order to take advantage of the lower rate for neutered animals, the owner shall, at the time MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB j CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES Ordinance No Page 11 application is made for a dog or cat license, present a certificate of neutering signed by a veterinarian containing a description of the animal, its call name, and date of neutering if known. Such certificate may be used in subsequent annual license applications. Upon payment of the license fee established pursuant to this division, the city shall issue to the owner a license which shall contain the name of the owner, his place of residence, and a description of the dog or cat. The city shall keep a duplicate of each license issued as a public record. If the animal to be licensed is a guard/attack dog, as defined in this chapter, the owner shall include such fact on the license application. f. The owner of a dog or cat less than six months of age which is no longer with its dam, but which is too young to be immunized, shall be issued a temporary city license upon application to the city and payment of the regular fee. Such temporary license shall automatically expire seven months from the date of birth of the dog or cat unless the owner shall furnish to the city a veterinarian's certificate showing that the dog or cat has been immunized. If such certificate is furnished prior to the time such dog or cat reaches seven months of age, the temporary license shall automaticall:; become a regular annual license. g. Upon issuance of the license, the city shall deliver or mail to the owner a metal tag stamped wii.h the number of the license and the year for which it is issued. Sec. 7-58. Exceptions. The licensing provisions of this chapter shall not be intended to apply to dogs or cats whose owners are nonresidents temporarily within the city, Kennel dogs which are kept or raised in facilities licensed pursuant to Chapter 162 of the 1977 Code of Iowa solely for the bona fide purpose of sale and which are kept under constant restraint, to dogs or cats brought into the city for the purpose of participating in any dog or cat show, or to dogs properly trained to assist visually impaired persons for the purpose of aiding them in going from place to place and providing such dogs are kept restrained on the owner's premises, under supervision or control at all times, or under leash at all times. Sec. 7-59. Display of tag. a. :a Every pet animal shall wear the tag provided whenever such animal is off the property of its owner or not within a motor vehicle. Any method may be used to attach the tag to the animal such as a collar or other suitable device. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAS CEDAR RAPIDS - DES MOINES H �1 I i I Ordinance No Page 11 application is made for a dog or cat license, present a certificate of neutering signed by a veterinarian containing a description of the animal, its call name, and date of neutering if known. Such certificate may be used in subsequent annual license applications. Upon payment of the license fee established pursuant to this division, the city shall issue to the owner a license which shall contain the name of the owner, his place of residence, and a description of the dog or cat. The city shall keep a duplicate of each license issued as a public record. If the animal to be licensed is a guard/attack dog, as defined in this chapter, the owner shall include such fact on the license application. f. The owner of a dog or cat less than six months of age which is no longer with its dam, but which is too young to be immunized, shall be issued a temporary city license upon application to the city and payment of the regular fee. Such temporary license shall automatically expire seven months from the date of birth of the dog or cat unless the owner shall furnish to the city a veterinarian's certificate showing that the dog or cat has been immunized. If such certificate is furnished prior to the time such dog or cat reaches seven months of age, the temporary license shall automaticall:; become a regular annual license. g. Upon issuance of the license, the city shall deliver or mail to the owner a metal tag stamped wii.h the number of the license and the year for which it is issued. Sec. 7-58. Exceptions. The licensing provisions of this chapter shall not be intended to apply to dogs or cats whose owners are nonresidents temporarily within the city, Kennel dogs which are kept or raised in facilities licensed pursuant to Chapter 162 of the 1977 Code of Iowa solely for the bona fide purpose of sale and which are kept under constant restraint, to dogs or cats brought into the city for the purpose of participating in any dog or cat show, or to dogs properly trained to assist visually impaired persons for the purpose of aiding them in going from place to place and providing such dogs are kept restrained on the owner's premises, under supervision or control at all times, or under leash at all times. Sec. 7-59. Display of tag. a. :a Every pet animal shall wear the tag provided whenever such animal is off the property of its owner or not within a motor vehicle. Any method may be used to attach the tag to the animal such as a collar or other suitable device. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAS CEDAR RAPIDS - DES MOINES H Ordinance No. Page 12 Sec. 7-60. Transfer on change of ownership. i When the permanent ownership of a dog or cat is transferred, the new owner shall within thirty days from the date of change of ownership make application for a new license as provided in Sec. 7-57 regardless of whether or not the dog or cat was previously licensed. Sec. 7-61. Duplicate tag. Upon the filing of an affidavit that the license has been lost or destroyed, the owner may obtain another tag upon payment of a fee set by the council. Sec. 7-62. Removal of license tags. It is unlawful for any person who is not the owner or the agent of such owner or an employee of the city or its agent acting in an official capacity to remove a license tag from a dog or cat prior to the expiration of the license. SECTION 3. REPEALER. All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provision of this ordinance are hereby repealed. SECTION 4. SEVERABILITY. If any section, provision or part of the Ordinance shall be adjudged to be invalid or unconstitutional, such ajudication shall not affect the validity of the Ordinance as a whole or any section, provision or part " thereof not adjudged invalid or unconstitutional. SECTION S. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall be in effect after its final passage, approva and publication as required by law. Passed and approved this i. AO ATTEST: CITY CL K /9G7 MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB i CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES ,,. CITY OF CIVIC CENTER 410 E. WASHINGTON ST. October 10, 1980 Mr. Nate Ruben, Area Manager U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development Univac Building 7100 West Center Road Omaha, Nebraska 68106 Dear Mr. Ruben: IOWA CITY IOWA CITY IOWA 52240 (319) 354.180D I am in receipt of your letter dated September 16, 1980, and I am pleased to see that the Area Office has established a goal for minority business (MBE) participation in HUD funded programs. The City of Iowa City is equally committed to expanding its utilization of minority business enterprises, and we welcome the challenge to set a realistic MBE goal for our CDBG program. The City has set as its goal for the fiscal year beginning October 1, 1980, $53,500 in MBE participation. This amount is approximately 6.2% of the estimated $8621215 in work to be contracted under our CDBG program. (Iowa City has approximately 3.1% minority Population.) We recognize that this is a minimum goal, and we will continue in an affirmative manner to exceed it. As requested in your letter, we will submit monthly reports on MBE utilization to your office. Sincerely yours, Neal G. Berlin�� C City Manager i bj/sp I cc: City Council MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LA13 CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES i i I. t ,I l I i I 1 CITY OF CIVIC CENTER 410 E. WASHINGTON ST. October 10, 1980 Mr. Nate Ruben, Area Manager U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development Univac Building 7100 West Center Road Omaha, Nebraska 68106 Dear Mr. Ruben: IOWA CITY IOWA CITY IOWA 52240 (319) 354.180D I am in receipt of your letter dated September 16, 1980, and I am pleased to see that the Area Office has established a goal for minority business (MBE) participation in HUD funded programs. The City of Iowa City is equally committed to expanding its utilization of minority business enterprises, and we welcome the challenge to set a realistic MBE goal for our CDBG program. The City has set as its goal for the fiscal year beginning October 1, 1980, $53,500 in MBE participation. This amount is approximately 6.2% of the estimated $8621215 in work to be contracted under our CDBG program. (Iowa City has approximately 3.1% minority Population.) We recognize that this is a minimum goal, and we will continue in an affirmative manner to exceed it. As requested in your letter, we will submit monthly reports on MBE utilization to your office. Sincerely yours, Neal G. Berlin�� C City Manager i bj/sp I cc: City Council MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LA13 CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES i i I. t ,I l i I r 1 October 10, 1980 MEMORANDUM TO: City Council FROM: Pam Ramser, Human Services Coordinator RE: 1980 Joint Budget Hearings Discussion at Monday Informal Session This year there are three joint sessions scheduled at which agencies requesting funding from Iowa City under "Aid to Agencies" will present budget and program information. All hearings are scheduled from 7:00 PM to 10:00 PM on Wednesday evenings in the basement of the First Christian Church.Relevant hearings are as follows: Wednesday, October 15 7:00 PM Crisis Center Transient Program (Iowa City; United Way) 7:30 PM Crisis Center (Iowa City, United Way, Johnson County) 8:00 PM Pals Program (Iowa City, United Way, Johnson County) 9:00 PM United Action for Youth (Iowa City, United Way, Johnson County Wednesday, October 22 7:00 PM Elderly Services Agency (Iowa City, United Way, Johnson County) 8:00 PM Mayor's Youth Employment (Iowa City, United Way) 9:00 PM Willow Creek (Mark IV) (Iowa City, United Way) tt Wednesday, October 29 7:00 PM Rape Victim Advocacy (Iowa City, Johnson County) 7:30 PM Aid and Alternatives for Victims of spouse Abuse (Iowa City, Johnson County) 8:15 PM Iowa City Residence for Women (Johnson County) 9:00 PM MECCA '(Johnson County) I will be meeting with the Council briefly on Monday to distribute budget materials and discuss Council representation at the joint hearings. I recommend that two or three councilmembers be designated to attend each of the three hearings, perhaps on a rotating basis so that each councilmember would attend at least one hearing. yl 11 October 10, 1980 MEMORANDUM TO: City Council FROM: Pam Ramser, Human Services Coordinator RE: 1980 Joint Budget Hearings Discussion at Monday Informal Session This year there are three joint sessions scheduled at which agencies requesting funding from Iowa City under "Aid to Agencies" will present budget and program information. All hearings are scheduled from 7:00 PM to 10:00 PM on Wednesday evenings in the basement of the First Christian Church.Relevant hearings are as follows: Wednesday, October 15 7:00 PM Crisis Center Transient Program (Iowa City; United Way) 7:30 PM Crisis Center (Iowa City, United Way, Johnson County) 8:00 PM Pals Program (Iowa City, United Way, Johnson County) 9:00 PM United Action for Youth (Iowa City, United Way, Johnson County Wednesday, October 22 7:00 PM Elderly Services Agency (Iowa City, United Way, Johnson County) 8:00 PM Mayor's Youth Employment (Iowa City, United Way) 9:00 PM Willow Creek (Mark IV) (Iowa City, United Way) tt Wednesday, October 29 7:00 PM Rape Victim Advocacy (Iowa City, Johnson County) 7:30 PM Aid and Alternatives for Victims of spouse Abuse (Iowa City, Johnson County) 8:15 PM Iowa City Residence for Women (Johnson County) 9:00 PM MECCA '(Johnson County) I will be meeting with the Council briefly on Monday to distribute budget materials and discuss Council representation at the joint hearings. I recommend that two or three councilmembers be designated to attend each of the three hearings, perhaps on a rotating basis so that each councilmember would attend at least one hearing. 1 10/15/80 7:00 PM PROGRAM INFORMATION SUMMARY Iowa City Crisis Center - Transient Service JC COG 10/8/80 Funding is requested from Iowa City and United Way to help provide comprehensive crisis intervention services to travelers stranded in the Iowa City/Johnson County area. Services provided include emergency food, lodging, and transportation assistance. Potential clients are screened carefully and financial assistance provided in the form of vouchers. Follow-up is provided by asking clients to contact the Center again if they need additional help. Services are provided free of charge, although clients are asked to repay any assistance if they are able to do so. A total of 1,232 service contacts were received in 1979 and 818 individuals assisted. This represents an increase of 1.2% in individuals served over 1978. The program's request from Iowa City and United Way is $2,500 each. Problems in service delivery involve lack of adequate firms t0 provide assistance such as car repairs and more than one night's lodging. During 1980, many individuals requiring assistance were not able to be helped due to lack of funds. The Center requests that local funding bodies make a commitment to provide adequate funding for this program. The program may not continue if this is not done. It is suggested that United Way continue to work with the Crisis Center and other local agencies to advocate for adequate services to those individuals with unmet needs. In 1981, it is projected that this program will provide food assistance to 515 individuals (an increase of 18.4% over the 1980 goal), lodging assistance to 250 individuals (a decrease of 28.6% over the 1980 goal), and miscellaneous assistance to individuals needing items such as medicine, diapers, or minor car repairs. The cost of this program is projected at $8500 in direct financial assistance. All allocations will be used for direct assistance, whereas during 1979 a share of the Center's administrative costs and rent were charged to this program and in 1980 a share of the rent was charged to the program. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS - DES MOINES I i i i i i 10/15/80 7:00 PM PROGRAM INFORMATION SUMMARY Iowa City Crisis Center - Transient Service JC COG 10/8/80 Funding is requested from Iowa City and United Way to help provide comprehensive crisis intervention services to travelers stranded in the Iowa City/Johnson County area. Services provided include emergency food, lodging, and transportation assistance. Potential clients are screened carefully and financial assistance provided in the form of vouchers. Follow-up is provided by asking clients to contact the Center again if they need additional help. Services are provided free of charge, although clients are asked to repay any assistance if they are able to do so. A total of 1,232 service contacts were received in 1979 and 818 individuals assisted. This represents an increase of 1.2% in individuals served over 1978. The program's request from Iowa City and United Way is $2,500 each. Problems in service delivery involve lack of adequate firms t0 provide assistance such as car repairs and more than one night's lodging. During 1980, many individuals requiring assistance were not able to be helped due to lack of funds. The Center requests that local funding bodies make a commitment to provide adequate funding for this program. The program may not continue if this is not done. It is suggested that United Way continue to work with the Crisis Center and other local agencies to advocate for adequate services to those individuals with unmet needs. In 1981, it is projected that this program will provide food assistance to 515 individuals (an increase of 18.4% over the 1980 goal), lodging assistance to 250 individuals (a decrease of 28.6% over the 1980 goal), and miscellaneous assistance to individuals needing items such as medicine, diapers, or minor car repairs. The cost of this program is projected at $8500 in direct financial assistance. All allocations will be used for direct assistance, whereas during 1979 a share of the Center's administrative costs and rent were charged to this program and in 1980 a share of the rent was charged to the program. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS - DES MOINES I i 10/15/80 7:30 PM PROGRAM INFORMATION SUMMARY Iowa City Crisis Intervention Center Funding is requested to help support the following programs: -Crisis Intervention -Food Bank -Community Education -Transient Counseling -Expansion of I&R Project -Office Relocation The last two programs represent new areas this year. JC COG 10/8/80 The agency's services are available 24 hours a day; office hours are from 11:00 A.M. to 2:00 A.M. daily. Client/staff ratio is 6806 clients:2 paid staff + 120 volunteers. There has been a 20% increase in the number of volunteers over last year. A total of 6806 service contacts were received in 1979, an increase of 11.2% over 1978; an estimated 5442 clients were served during 1979 (unduplicated count based on 80% of total contacts). Requests from local funding bodies are (with comparison to last year's funding): Source 1980/FY 81 1981/FY 82 % Change Iowa City ,r $ 8,000 +49.5 Johnson County 16,522 25,000 +51.3 10/15/80 7:30 PM PROGRAM INFORMATION SUMMARY Iowa City Crisis Intervention Center Funding is requested to help support the following programs: -Crisis Intervention -Food Bank -Community Education -Transient Counseling -Expansion of I&R Project -Office Relocation The last two programs represent new areas this year. JC COG 10/8/80 The agency's services are available 24 hours a day; office hours are from 11:00 A.M. to 2:00 A.M. daily. Client/staff ratio is 6806 clients:2 paid staff + 120 volunteers. There has been a 20% increase in the number of volunteers over last year. A total of 6806 service contacts were received in 1979, an increase of 11.2% over 1978; an estimated 5442 clients were served during 1979 (unduplicated count based on 80% of total contacts). Requests from local funding bodies are (with comparison to last year's funding): Source 1980/FY 81 1981/FY 82 % Change Iowa City $ 5,350 $ 8,000 +49.5 Johnson County 16,522 25,000 +51.3 United Way 13,520 18,200 +34.6 Funding requests are divided among programs in the following manner: Program Crisis Intervention Food Bank Transient Counseling Community Education Information & Referral Expansion Office Relocation Iowa City $1,670 579 1,710 990 Johnson Co. $3,585 579 570 330 United Wa $2,670 929 3,104 578 1,520 880 Follow up is done by asking clients to contact the Center again if they need additional help. This is done particularly where referrals may be needed. I MICROFILMED BY JORM MIC R+L AB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES /969 I, All services are free of charge. The Center has been involved in the following joint planning efforts: i -JCRPC Council on Prevention -JCRPC I&R Services Survey -Planning efforts by local providers to provide coordinated services to spouse abuse victims The following complaints about services and problems in service delivery are noted: Problem Proposed Solution 1. Inaccessible location Office relocation 2. Poor psychological atmosphere Office relocation 3. Out-of-date referral informa- Hire 's -time I&R tion; inappropriate referrals coordinator to improve service quality 4. Lack of publicity of I&R function Hire h -time I&R coordinator to improve service quality. t , 5. Dissatisfaction with some volun- Free staff time for supervision teers' counseling abilities by hiring I&R coordinator The Center suggests that United Way help provide more indepth evaluation of the Joint Budgeting Process and explore the possibility of purchasing a computer to be used by all agencies for statistics, bookkeeping, etc. The Center notes that United Way has always been very supportive of the i agency's efforts. 'i Changes in the Center's goals and objectives from those for 1980 include: CRISIS INTERVENTION: An increase in the number of volunteers from 100 to 120. OFFICE RELOCATION (new area): The goal of this area is to allevaite physical barriers and improve upon the Center's psychological atmosphere. Funding in the amount of $2100 ; would cover securing a space, moving costs, publicizing new location, increase in rent for 1500 square foot area, procuring suitable furnishings for new office. This would begin in July, 1981. I & R EXPANSION (new area): The goal of this area is to provide for the nine components of I & R identified by the Human Services Project (see attached sheet). Funding in the amount of $3700 would provide for update and dissemination of referral I MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES �'� i i u. � r 1 i All services are free of charge. The Center has been involved in the following joint planning efforts: i -JCRPC Council on Prevention -JCRPC I&R Services Survey -Planning efforts by local providers to provide coordinated services to spouse abuse victims The following complaints about services and problems in service delivery are noted: Problem Proposed Solution 1. Inaccessible location Office relocation 2. Poor psychological atmosphere Office relocation 3. Out-of-date referral informa- Hire 's -time I&R tion; inappropriate referrals coordinator to improve service quality 4. Lack of publicity of I&R function Hire h -time I&R coordinator to improve service quality. t , 5. Dissatisfaction with some volun- Free staff time for supervision teers' counseling abilities by hiring I&R coordinator The Center suggests that United Way help provide more indepth evaluation of the Joint Budgeting Process and explore the possibility of purchasing a computer to be used by all agencies for statistics, bookkeeping, etc. The Center notes that United Way has always been very supportive of the i agency's efforts. 'i Changes in the Center's goals and objectives from those for 1980 include: CRISIS INTERVENTION: An increase in the number of volunteers from 100 to 120. OFFICE RELOCATION (new area): The goal of this area is to allevaite physical barriers and improve upon the Center's psychological atmosphere. Funding in the amount of $2100 ; would cover securing a space, moving costs, publicizing new location, increase in rent for 1500 square foot area, procuring suitable furnishings for new office. This would begin in July, 1981. I & R EXPANSION (new area): The goal of this area is to provide for the nine components of I & R identified by the Human Services Project (see attached sheet). Funding in the amount of $3700 would provide for update and dissemination of referral I MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES �'� information, training of volunteers to provide advocacy, meetings with service providers for policy and political advocacy, outreach to publicize this and other services, and statistics maintenance. This would begin in July 1981. This last areas presents concerns regarding coordination with the Johnson County Services Index and the new 7 -county I & R service located in Linn County. A meeting of those involved is scheduled to discuss concerns. I MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES M, :A ; r_ d 1 r information, training of volunteers to provide advocacy, meetings with service providers for policy and political advocacy, outreach to publicize this and other services, and statistics maintenance. This would begin in July 1981. This last areas presents concerns regarding coordination with the Johnson County Services Index and the new 7 -county I & R service located in Linn County. A meeting of those involved is scheduled to discuss concerns. I MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES M, :A ; r_ d r `l I: i .d i i au,� 10/15/80 8: 00 PM PROGRAM INFORMATION SUMMARY Pals Program - Johnson County Extension JC COG 10/8/80 Funding is requested to help support the Pals Program as a whole. The Pals Program provides for supplemental social, emotional, mental and Physical development of children from single parent families by careful matching with an adult volunteer; successful matches result in a long-term relationship between the volunteer and child. Client/staff ratio is 2 staff:80 children, 80 parents, 80 volunteers; in addition, a small group recreation program called the Group Activity Program (GAP) is provided for 45 children on the waiting list to be matched. This represents a 14% increase in successful matches over last year and a 12.5% increase in those participating in GAP. It should be noted that the GAP program is coordinated by an Urban 4-H Aide, employee Of ISU Extension, and the only cost to Pals is in supervision time. A total of $250 contacts for service were received in 1979. This represents an increase of 25% over 1978. Although the information submitted by the Pals Program indicates that 80 children, parents, and volunteers were served during the last year, the Pals Coordinator has said that surrently only 70 matches are being maintained. In addition, the Coordinator has indicated that both boys and girls are being served by the GAP program, whereas in past only boys were served by this program. She has indicated that the reason for this is to make the program less discriminatory and to provide for the social needs of girls as well as boys in single parent families. Client follow-up measures include regular contact with all those involved in a match (parent, child and volunteer) and ongoing evaluations of the child's progress and program (quarterly). Matches are ' evaluated at termination. No fees are charged for services. Joint planning involvement listed this year, as well as last, includes follow-up meetings for Regional Planning Commission's Human Services Study (i.e., youth -serving agencies) and consultations with other agencies. Funding requests are as follows: Source 1980/FY 80 1981/FY 82 Iowa City $17,000 Johnson County 4 000 MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR#LAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES $18,000 6,000 % Change +5.9 +50.0 i t �fl � r 1 i 10/15/80 8: 00 PM PROGRAM INFORMATION SUMMARY Pals Program - Johnson County Extension JC COG 10/8/80 Funding is requested to help support the Pals Program as a whole. The Pals Program provides for supplemental social, emotional, mental and Physical development of children from single parent families by careful matching with an adult volunteer; successful matches result in a long-term relationship between the volunteer and child. Client/staff ratio is 2 staff:80 children, 80 parents, 80 volunteers; in addition, a small group recreation program called the Group Activity Program (GAP) is provided for 45 children on the waiting list to be matched. This represents a 14% increase in successful matches over last year and a 12.5% increase in those participating in GAP. It should be noted that the GAP program is coordinated by an Urban 4-H Aide, employee Of ISU Extension, and the only cost to Pals is in supervision time. A total of $250 contacts for service were received in 1979. This represents an increase of 25% over 1978. Although the information submitted by the Pals Program indicates that 80 children, parents, and volunteers were served during the last year, the Pals Coordinator has said that surrently only 70 matches are being maintained. In addition, the Coordinator has indicated that both boys and girls are being served by the GAP program, whereas in past only boys were served by this program. She has indicated that the reason for this is to make the program less discriminatory and to provide for the social needs of girls as well as boys in single parent families. Client follow-up measures include regular contact with all those involved in a match (parent, child and volunteer) and ongoing evaluations of the child's progress and program (quarterly). Matches are ' evaluated at termination. No fees are charged for services. Joint planning involvement listed this year, as well as last, includes follow-up meetings for Regional Planning Commission's Human Services Study (i.e., youth -serving agencies) and consultations with other agencies. Funding requests are as follows: Source 1980/FY 80 1981/FY 82 Iowa City $17,000 Johnson County 4 000 MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR#LAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES $18,000 6,000 % Change +5.9 +50.0 i t 2 n * United Way - 5,000 n/a The program continues to experience a long waiting list. Although an additional half-time staff person was added last year, the agency notes a continuing need for additional staff to help meet the need for this service. Please see the agency's Goals and Objectives statement for specific information. Changes since last year exist in the number of successful matches proposed (90 for FY 82; an increase of 28.6% over the FY 81 goal). A change also exists in the number of potential volunteers to be recruited (200 for FY 82, an increase of 25% over the FY 81 goals). *Because Pals has hot been granted beneficiary agency status for 1981, this request has been withdrawn. I is I, i_ t I 10/15/80 9:00 PM r.� PROGRAM INFORMATION SUMMARY United Action for Youth JC COG 10/8/80 Funding is requested from United Way, Iowa City, and Johnson County to help support the agency's Outreach Program and from Johnson County to help support the Synthesis Program. United Action for Youth exists to assist young people, especially those alienated from traditional approaches to youth service, in identifying their individual needs and opportunities and to facilitate meeting those needs with regard for the community. Client/staff ratio is 222:3 compared to 240:3 last year. A total of 222 Johnson County clients were served by the Outreach Program during 1979. This is a slight decrease from the number served during 1978 (-5.1%). Service contacts number 13,375 for the outreach program during 1979 and 13,609 during 1978. Follow-up is conducted through frequent personal contact with clients (4,072 in FY 79 and 4,470 in FY 78). No fees are charged in\the Outreach program. Synthesis charges some people for doing workshops, to cover equipment and supply costs. Funding requests are as follows (with comparison with last year's funding): Source 1980/FY 81 1981/FY 82 % Change Iowa City $30,000 $33,000 + Johnson County 30 000 10.0 United Way 32,000 +6,7 5,370 10,000 +86.2 A large number of joint planning efforts are listed. New ones this year are: Adolescent Pregnancy Service Coalition, Task Force on Deinstitutionalization, Department of Social Services Community -Based Services Review Panel. Complaints about services and problems in service delivery are listed as follows: Problem Proposed Solution I. More time should be spent in out- Added staff support lying areas (Solon & Lone Tree in outlying areas 2. UAY should do only outreach Educate public about MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES x FA 3. Lack of effective evaluation of UAY's impact on individuals and the community The first two were also mentioned last year. n youth programming needs Solicit and implement cost- effective impact evaluation design United Action for Youth suggests that United Way develop cost-sharing administrative devices to be used by all agencies, such as a computer service, Xerox, clerical pool. It should be noted that this suggestion was also given by the Crisis Center. The agency also suggests that United Way change its fiscal year to that used by the other two local funding bodies and develop the beneficiary agency meeting into a useful information and support group. Goals and objectives are the same as last year's (see information submitted by the agency for more detail.) Program costs are as follows: Program FY80 FY82 % Change Outreach $43,159 $44,343 Synthesis 32,493 36,952 MICROFILMED BY JO RM MICR+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES +2.7 +13.7 /*6 p ra h i i t L, s I k L 1 FA 3. Lack of effective evaluation of UAY's impact on individuals and the community The first two were also mentioned last year. n youth programming needs Solicit and implement cost- effective impact evaluation design United Action for Youth suggests that United Way develop cost-sharing administrative devices to be used by all agencies, such as a computer service, Xerox, clerical pool. It should be noted that this suggestion was also given by the Crisis Center. The agency also suggests that United Way change its fiscal year to that used by the other two local funding bodies and develop the beneficiary agency meeting into a useful information and support group. Goals and objectives are the same as last year's (see information submitted by the agency for more detail.) Program costs are as follows: Program FY80 FY82 % Change Outreach $43,159 $44,343 Synthesis 32,493 36,952 MICROFILMED BY JO RM MICR+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES +2.7 +13.7 /*6 p I . r. i i t L, I R J uuwL i unw i Re�sed 8-27-88 AGENCY _ Iowa City Crisis Cent" - Transient ADDRESS 112 east ,shin �Aa .� ' Service FORMS COMPLETED BY Kav Duncan, Director Name anh �;rio EXPENDITURE SUMMARY :TOTAL rl.Beginning FY80 Actual FY81 Projected Budgeted Minus Last Year This Year Next Year FY81.. Balance 276.22 881.67 70.09 -811.58 a. Operating 189.96 815.58 0 b. Restricted -815.58 86.26 66.09 70.09 4.00 2. TOTAL Unrestricted Support 8,391.46 8,098.00 8 450.00 a. United Way 352.00 b. Iowa City 1,658.46 2,248.00 2 550.00 302.00 c. Johnson County 21500.00 2,500-00 2 500.00 0 d. All Other Dona€ion§ Coenmgursefient 4 233.00 3,350.00 3. TOTAL Unrestricted Funds Carried Forward and Current (la + 2) 8,581.42 8,913.58 8,450.00 -463.58 4. TOTAL Restricted Support a. Restricted by Donor 4.83 4.00 4 0 0 b. Designated by Boardnt rest on 4.83 4.00 4:00 p 5. TOTAL Restricted Funds Carried Forward and Current (lb + 4) 91.09 70.09 74.09 4.00 6. GRAND TOTAL Funds Available (3 + 5) 8,672.51 8,983.67 8,524.09 -459.58 7. GRAND TOTAL Expenditures 7,790.84 8,913.58 8,450.00 -463.58 a. Financed by Unrestricted Funds 7,765.84 8,913.58 8,450.00 -463.58 b. Financed by Restricted Funds 25.00 0 0 0 8. Ending Balance (6 - 7) 881.67 70.09 74.09 4.00 Summary of Expenses and Outlays 9. Management and General 481.45 270.00 0 270.00 10. Payments to Affiliated Organizations 11. Major Property & Equipment Acquisition 12. Program Services 7,309.39 8,643.58 8,450.00 193.58 a. Transient Service 7,309,39 8,643.58 8,450.00 193.58 *On last year's (FY81) budget forms the ending balance for FY79 was reported as$192.90. The discrepancy in that balance and the beginning balance above is due to an oversight in not reporting the Hawtrey Memorial Fund last year as well as an error of $2.94 in our checking account balance which was later discovered. MICROFILMED BY JURM MICR+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES DESCRIPTION OF RESTRICTED FUNDS GRANTS pmwas as Please indicate the specs fiscal year (e.g., Calendar 1981' 'July '81 — June• 'B2) for which funds are atsignated in items 1-4 FY82 I. Funds Restricted by Donor Source 2. Donations Restricted by Your Board Restricted Use Use Amount This Year Next Year TOTAL Amount This Year Next Year I t i i I J 3. Donated Services DESCRIPTION OF RESTRICTED FUNDS GRANTS pmwas as Please indicate the specs fiscal year (e.g., Calendar 1981' 'July '81 — June• 'B2) for which funds are atsignated in items 1-4 FY82 I. Funds Restricted by Donor Source 2. Donations Restricted by Your Board Restricted Use Use Amount This Year Next Year TOTAL Amount This Year Next Year S. Funds Generated through Grants having Matching Requirements Time Period Agency Providing Amount Agency Providing Amount of Grant Seed Money Seed Money Grant Grant MATCH FOR TOTAL SEED MONEY TOTAL GRANTS TOTAL AMOUNT Generated through Grants (Total Seed ifoney + Total Grants) MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LA9 CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES N410 i TOTAL 3. Donated Services Service Hours Estimated Dollar Equivalent This Year Next Year This Year Next Year Crisis Center Volunteers 2135 2135 80540,00 101675,00 Crisis C. n ar Staff 312 312 1,699.00 1,928.00 TOTAL DOLLAR EQUIVALENT 12,603.00 10,239.00 4. Donated Materials Material Amount Material Estimated Dollar value This Year Next Year This Year Next Year Staff Benefits 265.00 322.00 Rent.Insurance.Repairs 635.00 730.00 I1H 14 H nh r Supplier 256.00 272.00 70,00 60,00 TOTAL DOLLAR VALUE 11216.00 1.394.00 S. Funds Generated through Grants having Matching Requirements Time Period Agency Providing Amount Agency Providing Amount of Grant Seed Money Seed Money Grant Grant MATCH FOR TOTAL SEED MONEY TOTAL GRANTS TOTAL AMOUNT Generated through Grants (Total Seed ifoney + Total Grants) MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LA9 CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES N410 i Budget Form 3 Proposed Budget GRAND TOTAL FY81 . SIIPYOnTWG SERVICES Toru PROGRAM A a C O E I P G REVENUE IL SUPPORT: all sources S' 1. bIAMr At eryllulIN dl I'll r. Conlrlwuonl:.I tnerdl ootrrtlm e.omlri AIR t feted to Iwlldlp hind cl r,strIlUd to other IN_n Wndbw IuM 600 50. _ ]. ClPleili A. TuMrAISIM S. AiRfvenll CM WAS Ira Ioctl eller.11, -1. shed.. lP Ouei (IMIYIMAII) ?. AIINAtICAl AI rMeritrl rundnlfin9 OrVmlullaS (dthrr then Idol WI A. A11.41af AI UMNa111rd AM MnledaaM F.Awy,11IM Or,,.Imlas 9• FAA, AM Crinn I. CIIII..t A9f Kle1 (.tiler tNn 1M CIII AM ddhnldn CWnt1) 10. Pra9rAa SArr ICA rrn 11. S.I. at IwterlAll AM Slrrluu (9uAllc) (Other) It. larefben1, ln1,> Interest on MmQrIAI(interest on a Boar I de2jLi ated fu id and i riot a Tocated at this time U. WI., an ImellMnl INniKaal IC a1SCOIIAM ul AerAae (IMICAIA, IMNId-0 ~Its): A) Reimburtements 7an.rin Inn nn Inn fln Inn Ar el IS. CIInACAI TOTAL RIVE" MO SUP?CAT eines ? lhrawn IQ —T7547 au 0 ' IA. rGIA1 AIYEM AM SUPaOIi •• CArr11d IonAM AM to rant OO. G 11. I01AL IM RESTRICTED (or Aare HIM 0' 0 It. [m lently AIIM•IM AASUktM NMI 11111, AI rm.11.41 u1.1; AI 0 0 0 0 A) 19. Aestr11,1ed ruWs Cirri" rano. (Ila AI reaulred ales: A Oar C9 gna[e AI v A 9. Coralville 550.00 550.00 jA Only $31400.00 of total expected revenue reported on this page has been allocated toward expenses at this time. The remaining $74.09 is money 1 In a Board designated fund which is earmarked for emergencies and will require Board approval prior to expending. j j MICROFILMED BY JO RM MICR¢LAB CEDAR RAPIDS •DES MOINES ?L - i Ij I. i I .1 S' 0 • tl` Y Crisis Center 7r=81,tat Servire PnOGF'I Budge'Form 3 °!�"" ��'"'` F981 2 SEPVICES 101A1 A e C O f proposed B el v EXPENSES To. LNr11, Itw1A II. [gl•In w•rlll• AI, [,Hell urn Iqu. UnrglPlwntl 270.00 il. hflrxlowl rm Bookkee In Ir. a<uwmr: d Apt hl M,rtwle I/IMntf cl ull 111TH InduIIM nwnrl el lnfnr.m• INualnv ,1a c•Mntf, PreMa) u.nn url e) ief/Irf /1,A Nlnlrn,ze i3. tgrpwM , IA. Prnnl el [mlpenl i/. N/Inlewzr ,1,d Ptwlr 01 tW 1p+nt II. r1, U9r ,N ShIMIM I9. Surolln 10. vrintlM ,1,d luhllntlwf 11. Latl tnMeartnlan: ,1 NIIw9e hl rtnlcle Tree tl leM•Ir Imunze li. (anlrrrze. femmtlW ,M 14etiM LPemn Jl. 1 11M1 Pm er ASSM"nu: 11 OM,nlntlen Net of Antnwnlf hl IMbleuJ rrnfeu local Nrf 11. rlwzw Anlsuw• to 19r2n11 cr,nn ]E. IMMflowl lutrlllu Infunzr It. NlaelbnWuf EIMMI. Ilbtl: Is. .1014 VIRAIINO EVINS(A lllerl Io Wmph 111 ' 19. IreMrq A<Wglllen 10. [W lvfnl kWltlller II, o,Pm1,tIW en [eflP " 8.9 3. •0 Q. TOTAL EIP(NHS -• O rAtlM (JAI /b 0191" oo 111 42. [antlMez) I•N _ 11. InrellnMli 1S _ rum _ Q. a0u1 Plnr lb •ISI'2.550.0 2.248. 2 550.00 2,55U. Q. Auaunhx a[1NNsl[o ria: wu[o wr 2 500.00 2 500500.0(0( 00.0 2 CII[ W IPu ❑II .00 J MON c14M1 4,748.00 5 050.00 5 050 Q. IOIAL A[rasis ria tau MING sL11N([E , MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LA6 CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES 9 v MuthuI Crisis Center Transient Service BUDGET FORM 4 • PERSONNEL SUMMARY SUMMARY OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES Staff Positions and Salaries Position Employee Name Fulltime FY80 FY81 FY82 Title * = Position Equivalent Last Year This Year Next Year Vacant ** Actual Est'd. Budget Administrative staff donated by Crisis Center TOTAL SALARIES _ TOTAL NO. PERSONNEL TOTAL FULLTIME EQUIVALENTS ** 1.00 = Fulltime; ,50 = Halftime; .25 = Quartertime, etc. Assets and Liabilities as of December 31, 1979 (From Most Recent Audit: Date Completed may 12, 1980 ) approved Assets Liabilities 8 Fund Balances Explanation or Comment 1. Current Fund Total -- .Z a. Restricted 63.50 Maz Hawirex Meworlal cret on ry un b. Unrestricted '9.21 I , 2. Land, Buildings and Equipment MuthuI Crisis Center Transient Service BUDGET FORM 4 • PERSONNEL SUMMARY SUMMARY OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES Staff Positions and Salaries Position Employee Name Fulltime FY80 FY81 FY82 Title * = Position Equivalent Last Year This Year Next Year Vacant ** Actual Est'd. Budget Administrative staff donated by Crisis Center TOTAL SALARIES _ TOTAL NO. PERSONNEL TOTAL FULLTIME EQUIVALENTS ** 1.00 = Fulltime; ,50 = Halftime; .25 = Quartertime, etc. Assets and Liabilities as of December 31, 1979 (From Most Recent Audit: Date Completed may 12, 1980 ) approved Assets Liabilities 8 Fund Balances Explanation or Comment 1. Current Fund Total -- .Z a. Restricted 63.50 Maz Hawirex Meworlal cret on ry un b. Unrestricted '9.21 Checking Account 2. Land, Buildings and Equipment 3. EndowEFund4, TOTAL Budget approved by: i - C k's -C7 -- .Z MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES :Gw Duncan, Dimetor Iowa City Crinir rent er-Tranrirnt :k:rvice 112 1/2 1' Nasl:ir.;;ton low& Oity, Iowa 522h0 Dear XV, After a preliminary review of your budg(?t, the fo).low- inC questions hrve been r0isfld by the Allocrtion Division of United ''lay; computation errors have also beor pointed out. 1. For the Calendar near budget please be prepared to er.— plain the discrepancy between this ,year's form 1, 197o folumn line 1 and last year's hudget fors: 1., 1978 column line n (1281.1h versus 1,14.:,9), 2. Form 3, line 1, doeer.'t break down. 3. Form 3, line 12 isnit brought out (whutev n• the purpose); totals on line 15 don't rlatch. )1. 1'or the fiscal ear bud+'et, please rx;dain w}y fi,,.ures for FR80 2b aren't 1 2 of '79 and 'Co. 5. Please clarify line 23 auC line 24 on the Calendar ,year budget and line 23 on the fiscal year budget. C. Please Le prepared to discues why you will spend less monsy in 1982 then you did ill J.p3l (line 34). Please return the budget by Snptember 5. 19AO after rectifying the errors that have Lcen pointed out. Thanks for your cooperation. Sincerely, Zncl. 1 !Iarj Anne Volr, Yxecutive T)irector MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES . ) a MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LA6 CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES %11;N3t 213, 1980 4 "transient i MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LA6 CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES %11;N3t 213, 1980 "transient i Calendar 3cpl+tin discrepancy this year, form 1, '79 column i lino .1, and last years budget, fon. 1, 179 column line 8. (1281.14 vs. 1304,09). Fotw 3, line 1, doesn't brcal: dove. I.. I Form 3, line 12, isn't brought out (whatever purpose); totals on 15 don't Hutch. Fiscal fbcjdain why figures for 17Yuu 2b aren't i 1/2 of '79 and 130rigures on calcndnr year. Vonr. 3, page 2, clurtfy 11nc 23 and 2h un c+Qendu.r Itn+l ?3 on fircetl M11cttus, spend lesu rinney S.n '61? t}hr.n in 'C1 — lint- 34. i J MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LA6 CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES tlUUUtI hUHM I Hevis AiiENCY" Iowa City Crisis Inte intion Center ADDRESS 112 ✓,East Wash n¢ton FORMS COMPLETED BY Kay Duncan, Director Name TOTAL REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE SUMMARY FY80 Actual FYSI Projected FY82 Budgeted FY82 Minus Last Year This Year Next Year FY81 1. Beginning BalanceEHEE 4,792,84 3 424.98 2 524.68 -900.10 a. Operating 1,599,79 990.84 0 -990.84 b. Restricted 3,193,05 2,434.14 2_L5 2 4 . 6 8 2. TOTAL Unrestricted Support 34,288,62 36 967.16 54 783.00 a. United Way 13,004,09 14 283.00 19 183 00 b. Iowa City 5.000.00 5.000.00 C. Johnson County 1 d, All Other 1,684.51 16F14-16 nn 3. TOTAL Unrestricted Funds Carried --2,Ann Forward and Current (la + 2) 35,888,41 37,958,00 54,783.00 16,825.00 4. TOTAL Restricted Support 5 z3 a. Restricted.by Donor b. Designated by Board 682.43 130,00 140.00 10,00 5. TOTAL Restricted Funds Carried Forwerd and Current (lb + 4) 8,425,14 7,934.14 8,214,68 280,54 6. GRAND TOTAL Funds Available (3 + 5) 44,313,55 45,892.14 62,997.68 17,105.54 7. GRAND TOTAL Expenditures 40,888.57 43,367.46 60 333,00 6,965.54 a. Financed by Unrestricted Funds 34,897.57 37,958.00 54,763,00 6,825.00 b. Financed by Restricted Funds 5,991,00 5,409.46 5,550,00 140.54 8. Ending Balance (6 - 7) 3,424,98 2,524,68 2,664,68 140.00 Summary of Expenses and Outlays 9. Management and General 27 883,96 29,459.00 33,070.00 3,611.00 10. Payments to Affiliated Organizations 11. Major Property 8 Equipment Acquisition 354 61 2 12. Program Services 2_704,541 a• Crisis Intervention _Zk,4LIjM_ b• Food Bank C. T a d. 1862 00 e, xpanginn f. r 9• i� MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES • BUUGET FORM Z "'' �-•-- .-.,�,�. DESCRIPTION OF RESTRICTED FUNDS. GRANTS 00N ONS Please indicate the spec a fiscal year (e.g.. Calendar.198, � July '81 - June' '82) for which funds are designated in items 1-4 FY82 I. Funds Restricted by Donor Source Use FY81 Amount FY82 This Year Next Year U of I Student Senate Sport and Program 1,900,00 7.;100,00 C f T i t C i Rpnt Roi h r 970.nn n Churches Service Grouns Food Bank 200.00 250.00 Wnrk RtnA" Matrhina Funds 4010 On 3.'00,00 TOTAL 5,370.00 5,550.00 2. Donations'Restricted by Your Board Restricted Use Amount This Year Next Year Interest on Board pegion- d Savin s 170.00 140.00 (funds used for capital improvements, unexpected expenses TOTAL 130,00 140.00 3. Donated Services Service Hours Estimated Dollar Equivalent This Year Next Year This Year Next Year Crisis Center Volunteers for 4,00/hr 5.00/hr „_- - 7�9A5 'A 2Ay 11�14n.On 16t0S.nn (2) Crisis Counseling Ilam -tam 10,950 10,950 43,800,00 54,750,00 (1) nn -Cali 74 hrAlda R,7Fio A 760 79n•n nn 43,Rnn_nn (I5) Training 3 times/year 2,700 2,700 10,800,00 13,500.00 (2) GOMnTuT11ty Education 75 75 300.00 375.00 TOTAL DOLLAR EQUIVALENT 103,080,00 128;850,00 A. Donated Materials Material Amount Material Estimated Dollar Value This Year Next Year This Year Next Year TOTAL DOLLAR VALUE S. Funds Generated through Grants having Matching Requirements Time Period Agency Providing Amount Agency Providing Amount of Grant Seed Money Seed Money Grant Grant nya5+ _ limited r Way Ala n0 3 iT0- 11 of T L/nrk SruRv MATCH FOR TOTAL SEED MONEY 800.00 TOTAL GRANTS 3,200.00 TOTAL AMOUNT Generated through Grants (Total Seed Money t Total Grants) 41000.00 MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DFS MOINES I i {: Iowa City Crisis Center .. GRWD TOAL T SUPPORT PIWORAM L Budget Form 3 • PIG SERVICES TOTAL A B c O G P O Pro orad Bud et REVENUE 9. Includes I Coralville 1,050,00 1,850.00 DefI Student Senate . 1,900.00 2,100.00 Work Study Match 3,000.00 7,200,00 The difference between GRAND TOTAL and SUPPORING SERVICES + TOTAI..PROGRAM is money in our Board designated savings. This money !s earmarked for 1 . unexpected emergencies and is not allocated at this time toward any particular expenditure. Expenditure of this fund requires Board approval. Y I MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS a DES MOINES &SUPPORT: all sources 1. 41.N. a tlwllmlm or rtIr 3,424.98 2 24.6 (carry < T. tonrleutmm: II twad+ o0«vont unemn 484.16 600.00 600 el ruml[ted to ONidlna fem <I re t"CE., a other Imn OuIIdLq rum Foad Dank 2 00 00 250 00 2 T. �Ilts mn41N 5. M+mvem+ IED an rroe lain .e,, ..It, Transient Service Ren[ 270.00 :. w-eennin uvn Pmino-,<lil I. AIIaLLIon+ OF FeRegted rurdre++lnt artrnlullocl (Omer then Iall tvl 1. .Il.111.1 OF U.11.11lq In! Mnlgenlq fumnitlp Orquw.... 1. feel em Gran, fro Goverment otenelef (ether Mn Iw. CII..m Jchma Cw.tJl 10. Irwrra 5.1111. feet II. 5tle of wterlll+ em TenI'll IFuellq ' - IOmerl u. Investeen Incas Interest on Hoard Designated Savin Il. bus OR Inastrent lun+.alws Interest on Reserves 150.00 150,00 efmPI ISO (III W a111.11mew+ IevtNe(Imluee INIII4W1+w1tn1:.1 Is. oNR[n :out hoc.+a A:J SUFRGM tun« r mlww 14)7 194 8.290.00 6 1 So 11. flat rtvtnuf um 5UR1'Gtl .. C.rr1el ron.rd am Current 10 6 4 14 i iqn 1,1001 I Il. IDEAL JIM RESTRICTED (OI hole mull 7 9:T4,14 A8,214,68.1 4,200,0111 1 ISO 11-100 250 Itl. turrmtlr Allo<tlq Rptrletq NOT 111.1, to rnu:..: mel: J Su etc 3-900.00 4 200 4 2 el 4 It. trurmted rums anted r,m,ra (lest Dr rewired eu): gEo:nd10Rj hated 2,524.68 2 664 68 tll Savin s 9. Includes I Coralville 1,050,00 1,850.00 DefI Student Senate . 1,900.00 2,100.00 Work Study Match 3,000.00 7,200,00 The difference between GRAND TOTAL and SUPPORING SERVICES + TOTAI..PROGRAM is money in our Board designated savings. This money !s earmarked for 1 . unexpected emergencies and is not allocated at this time toward any particular expenditure. Expenditure of this fund requires Board approval. Y I MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS a DES MOINES I - --- -- ---- Iowa City Crisis Center Budget Form 3 Pro osed Bud et GRAPID TOTAL FY81 FY82 SUPPORTING SERVICES TOTAL A e C 0 E F G EXPENSES CI I FB TC CE I6R Relocat A. U1,11. (6.[11 !t. (mlelKbeetfltl 27. Pq.11 I... 11IC. um.ol.,tl !]. Lrollwlfeef680.00 480.0f e9 1 N. Wew.r .1 11-t b) rore9ge P.m.tt C) utilities Inaludlm vlwtsAn nn Kan nr InA nn 194 771 11 inn in - d) Imuriese (Wildlm end cmtenti. lecWtY 146nitY) 700,00 ?�n nrl tin nn Tin 7n S is d 1..et .ro n nue.Me !S. IelgAwr as. R.t11 of ("iwnt !/. IYlelezrr Oro R.elr of [wig .t is. poster ew SRI.Im ISO n &nn nr ISO nn in 30. r.lwlm +r ruNwu.nl 31. last TrmlPRrtell.: .) MILew b) Vehicle Ie+a c) YAW. Imwence 17. WY,saY. Cmeenllm end N.V.. ISO nn 7nn nf lqn nn in1 13. RlelervAlP DM est Atlas, nW e) e.enl ullm Wet of Allenn.tl b) IMluldu+l Prnlestlm+l Wo 11, rlwzl+l A1411t+nre to Iwlndmll 3S. WHOOH01V Mediad M. Prninllwt CUMULI Immze T Ili U, aktelleawl [e+ennt Il bll: m"cetiancous M. 101st W(RuJIG ❑Anis Clines Je tbrou96 ➢1 n. P.Tertr kwlsltlm to. (wirrnl kwllltlon ASA 0 4nn nn Lin 7in!inn inn 11. Wamiftlm m Y9ulpent - A 17, Term (Ir(RAS -• WOellm (la) aro CeRltel 119 t+rwgb 11) 13. Cee,111 [r few &1 IA7 46 so gii n 500 .0(1 iq CIO nn iA RAI a inn 500.00i w E 16 Inlrtleenls Y u. Clan lolm (IPIRSIS IlMe, u e G r 117 43 376.46 60.333,0003.470. 1 9 100 744 1,377 1 AAIA 16. DEFICIT Ill., 16. ISI - - - - - -7 Aln ALItCFIN RIMSI(o JIN: Wino bill 4 A44 CITY l IPM till Aleesm cane J 4. TOTAL OCUSIS Yale LOCI NOIRG SCURC(S 9 i I.I A) Crisis Intervention B) Food Bank C) Transient Counseling O) Coimnunity Education E) I&R Expansion Project F) Office Relocation Project,., MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LA13 CEDAR RAPIDS a DES MOINES All Assets and Liabilities (aa of December 31, 1979) (From Most Recent Audit: Date Completed -ay 1z, 1gg0_ M) Assets 1 Liabilities & Explanation Fund Balances or Cori 1. Current Fund Total a. Restricted b. Unrestricted 2. Land, Buildings and Equipment 3, Endowment Fund 4. TOTAL - All Funds Budget approved by: Chi f Executive Officer Authorized Official Date MICROFILMED BY } JORM MICR+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES BUDGET FORM 4 Center - - - PERSONNEL SUMMARY /') SUMMARY OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES Staff Positions and Salaries Position Title Employee Name Fulltime FY80 * = Position Equivalent Vacant ** Last Year This Year Next Year j: Director Kay Duncan 100 Actual 12,000.00 Est 'd. 12,840,00 Budget 14,510.00 Assistant Director Pat Meyer 1,00 10,275.00 11,000,00 12,430.00 Work Study I 6 Annette Sward 50 2,885.84 3,750.00 47000,00 R Coordinator (to begin July 1, 1981) ,50 --- —_ 5,500,00 TOTAL SALARIES --�� 5 un ai. 77,520.00 TOTAL NO. PERSONNEL 36.44(1.00 TOTAL FULLTIME EQUIVALENTS- 3 4 *' 1.00 = Fulltime; .50 = Halftime; .25 = Quartertime. etc, 7 so _ 2.50 3.00 Assets and Liabilities (aa of December 31, 1979) (From Most Recent Audit: Date Completed -ay 1z, 1gg0_ M) Assets 1 Liabilities & Explanation Fund Balances or Cori 1. Current Fund Total a. Restricted b. Unrestricted 2. Land, Buildings and Equipment 3, Endowment Fund 4. TOTAL - All Funds Budget approved by: Chi f Executive Officer Authorized Official Date MICROFILMED BY } JORM MICR+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES "a:ust 28, 198n '.ttr Th:ncen, Nrcctor Iowa Cit-, Crisis Intervention Center 112 1/2 t•Iashington Iona City, Iowa 52240 Dear Kay, ?_•^ter a rrcliminary reviav of your budget by the Allocation Divisior. of United 'day, the fol.l.ouinr quectiors love, been raised., an': errors, detected: A. Col.enlar Year Budget A. T.tere in a nisnCreenent for 1975' stnrLin:: balance on this year's budget as compared with the 1978 endinC balance on ln3t year's budret (calendar year L•adret). 2. 111caae be prepared to dincuss 7 and )vrojeet (3,700) and Cffice Relocation 1'roieet (2,100); these are clearly not prorraas. 3. Form 1, rY 1980; 7a and 7b doesn't :old up to 7, thin affects line 8 and line I of 1981. h. Form 2, number 1: no totalu. 5. Totals for form 2 don't agree with .line 4e., form 1. G. form 3, line 1, 1981 ficuren don't add (berinninr balance) - therefore total and Supporting Servicen don't equal grand total. T. rlease be prepared to discuss the onune of rent increase (relationship to phone, equipment, publicity, etc.). D. Fiscal Year Dudret 1. Form 3, page 1, line 1, in not broken down; bo breahch m, no total. 2. Form 3, line 12 (Like the. calendar yenr budret) in not er-. rDnded across. 311cane. return the budret by T:epte^bcr 5, 17 nftcr recti^11nr tea errors indiettted. ihnll$u for your cooperation. 'f i. ncerely, t'nri Anno `her, "vneutIvo r)Irectorr MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LA6 CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES i `I f • � I i "a:ust 28, 198n '.ttr Th:ncen, Nrcctor Iowa Cit-, Crisis Intervention Center 112 1/2 t•Iashington Iona City, Iowa 52240 Dear Kay, ?_•^ter a rrcliminary reviav of your budget by the Allocation Divisior. of United 'day, the fol.l.ouinr quectiors love, been raised., an': errors, detected: A. Col.enlar Year Budget A. T.tere in a nisnCreenent for 1975' stnrLin:: balance on this year's budget as compared with the 1978 endinC balance on ln3t year's budret (calendar year L•adret). 2. 111caae be prepared to dincuss 7 and )vrojeet (3,700) and Cffice Relocation 1'roieet (2,100); these are clearly not prorraas. 3. Form 1, rY 1980; 7a and 7b doesn't :old up to 7, thin affects line 8 and line I of 1981. h. Form 2, number 1: no totalu. 5. Totals for form 2 don't agree with .line 4e., form 1. G. form 3, line 1, 1981 ficuren don't add (berinninr balance) - therefore total and Supporting Servicen don't equal grand total. T. rlease be prepared to discuss the onune of rent increase (relationship to phone, equipment, publicity, etc.). D. Fiscal Year Dudret 1. Form 3, page 1, line 1, in not broken down; bo breahch m, no total. 2. Form 3, line 12 (Like the. calendar yenr budret) in not er-. rDnded across. 311cane. return the budret by T:epte^bcr 5, 17 nftcr recti^11nr tea errors indiettted. ihnll$u for your cooperation. 'f i. ncerely, t'nri Anno `her, "vneutIvo r)Irectorr MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LA6 CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES i `I f • � I MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES CORRECTED " BUDGET FORM 1 � Fiscal Year AGENCY Pals Program ADDRESS 3149 Highway 218 South, Iowa City FORMS COMPLETED BY Stan R. Miller and Richard Ferguson, Board Members - Name and title TOTAL REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE SUMMARY FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 FY 82 Actual Projected Budgeted Minus I. Beginning Balance Last Year 5,834 This Year Next Year FY 81- 3,022 2,127 (895) a. Operating 1,834 3,022 21127 (895) b. Restricted 4,000 � 2. TOTAL Unrestricted Support 18,763 25,500 36,000 10,500 a. United Way -- 1 b. Iowa City 13,763 -- 15,500 5,000 18,000 5,000 2,500 c. Johnson County 3,000 5,000 6,000 1 000 ! d. All Other 2,000 51000 7,000 2,000 3. TOTAL Unrestricted Funds Carried --- - Forward and Current (la + 2) 20,597 28,522 38,127 9,605 4. TOTAL Restricted Support 'a. Restricted by Donor b. Designated by Board _ 5. TOTAL Restricted Funds Carried Forward and Current (lb + 4) 4,000 6. GRAND TOTAL Funds Available (3 + 5) 24,597.•28,522 38,127 9,605 I 1 7. GRAND TOTAL Expenditures 21$75 26,395 35,450 91055 a. Financed by Unrestricted Funds 17,575 26,395 .35,450 91055 b. Financed by Restricted Funds 4,000 8. Ending Balance (6 L 7) 3,022 2,127 2,677 550 Summary of Expenses and Outlays 9. Management and General 558 500 500 10. Payments to Affiliated Organizations 366 400 400 -- 11. Major Property b Equipment Acquisition -- _- i 12. Program Services 20,631 26,395 35,450 a• 20,631 26,395 35,450 b. C. d. e. I i f• i MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES nuuucj rune c -' DESCRIP [ON OF RESTRICTED FUNDS GRANTS DONATIONS Please indicate the spec : fiscal year (e.g.. Calendar 198 r July '81 - June 182) for which funds are designated in Items 1-4 ' 1. Funds Restricted by Donor Source 2. Donations Restricted by Your Board Restricted Use Use Amount This Year Next Year TOTAL Mount This Year Next Year TOTAL 3. Donated Services Service Hours Estimated Dollar Equivalent This Year Next Year This Year Next Year Johnson Co. Extension Council service include: travel, communications, office supplies, _rent, secretarial time, and insurance TOTAL DOLLAR EQUIVALENT 14,000 15,400 4. Donated Materials Material Amount Material Estimated Dollar Value This Year Next Year This Year Next Year Materials contributed by local merchants for use in PALS activity TOTAL DOLLAR VALUE 400 450 S. Funds Generated through Grants having Matching Requirements Time Period Agency Providing Amount Agency Providing Amount of Grant Seed Money Seed Money Grant Grant MATCH FOR TOTAL SEED MONEY TOTAL GRANTS TOTAL AMOUNT Generated through Grants (Total Seed Honey + Total Grants) MICROFILMED BY DORM MICR+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES /9W/9 i'. j i i, i„ R Budget Form 3 I r 9FPOR NO pR0o1AM • e c a E A G 4 e 1 SERMS Toru t R VENUE & SUPPCIRT: all sources 27 None 2 127 2,127 1. ut.M1 .t re5lMlp dr ,,,, Pals 1 P o ram Budget Form 3 TOTAL r 9FPOR NO pR0o1AM • e c a E A G Pr osed ftNet e 1 SERMS Toru t R VENUE & SUPPCIRT: all sources 27 None 2 127 2,127 1. ut.M1 .t re5lMlp dr ,,,, 0 1 ]. (antrinvllrnq 11 loxrdf rpnllp 1.gn,n nl n, t21l to w1I01p LM i e) mGlfled to other two nvlldlp IW ]. cMuat+000 0 a000 1 000 000 a a ,. fuMr.l,Ip S. Mve,YenU .q Oua rry lo[d aner vat, , 6. IM.fennlP b1, Ilglrldnlsl 5 1. MIx.uM, er rgo.tq r.Mr.mp o.v.ntr.uM, rou.r M.n IM.I Iwl B. AIIrcdIM, 1/ UMOa<Itled .M wnlgrnlq rugnblp Op.nIOtIMf 1. len .q OneM hu f Vlr. nt ASem". w... Von Iw CIV Aq Urnn,on Count,) 2 000 3 000 IO. rrOQIM SfM1I[f r.el II. S.le of wwbh tb SeMws; Ir,elld IOMerI IJ. I4e,l4n[ IMMe Il. L.In, M Inv,l..m r.....ctlon, Il Xlurlbnlwf Ampe IIgm.N InJlddwl Iturtn L' .) I e) I5. (unlp IOIAI A[vl.E Ap SurrWt Illps i tnrawln IIIUU 9r 7 16. IOM41[Y[.01 MU )WIXYtI •- Grrlq rrM.d IM Wren[ 11. MIA[ Iud05 lts"IC5C0 lef .mr, t1u11 la. [vrtnOr Allec.tq Intrlc[N LMI IIIM y rwu .,11:.1 el N. Ent,l,led fops C.r,W rorv,q (lilt e, "110 nd: U el MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB I� -l! CEDAR RAPIDS a DES MOINES I `+ CORRECTED BudgetFtxm 3 @d &d @t GRAND Toru l SWORTM SERVICES TOTAL NRIicR ' I A 6 C D F EXPENSES M. w.rm (Graff) 21315 29.700 None 29.700 1 29.700 EI. [ flta r], r.nm1 Tun ill", anoleLnq 2 580 3,500 3,500 3 ]J. hvfaafwl Fora IL,aluwKl: .) Rod n) MAIM /.pmt, . cl Ulliltlfa 1020WIm eroKI .) IminKr (Wlldlm .M l.wu, elaefr4 Ibhllltll el Nro.ba .M IAlnlemrce 15. Wnwro 26. lmt.1 or E.1wnt ' ]I. ftf.t.nrr .W Nfe.lr of tgYlpent I[. Mb1e .nd ]nlpplm � h. SVooilef ]O. lolntlm .b F 011ntlpf 1 ]I. laW Inmprbpen: .1 Nllaef n) Vehicle Imae i l !) Nehllte f.or.K. t It. Inhrfxf. tp.mtlon .w neltlm t...... 50 500 500 1). RMeeIMN Co" or Anmmmts: .) arwnll.tlen Oul or Afufwmt 0 400 1 400 n) hMlrlpd Fmlmflp.l Ora A. ]INKI.1 A.flfbKr to IMIYldwla ' SS. A rdt,.W 64nts K. lmf.0.1 L14131tV ImYLKf ]J, NHcelLKwf 4lrnaa (llat): I'milp RrrlVjr'Aq 800 850 A. ID14 MIRAT1NG ulllslS Plnm EO InreYlh v) 26 395 35 450 35,450 31. Froprrl] AtV.lfltfp 40. (wlpent koolsltlon 1 ' 41. al•eclrtim on 14.1wnt II. T014 l@(NRS •• arnlim (R) .W C.elbi (J] th ,h O) .35.450 f 41. loot lmtmy f9m ....In.eaUenla e. Wan 1014 LV(mlS (I 1K a ..I . u) 26,395 ' 35,450 35,450 35J50 .6. OUlllf Ilio! 16 • .3) ' Q. AlOGTIN AWESTIO FNN: WITIO YI 5 000 1 1 Onl a INA El" I b,buu— 18.000 J m INNII .e. TOTAL tumsts ria LOCA rMlm sm[as 1 20,500_ 29,000 1 MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LA13 CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES BUDGET FORM 4 Assets and Liabilities (From Most Recent Audit: Date Completed 7-1-80 Liabilities & PERSONNEL SUMMARY Assets Fund Balances SUMMARY OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES Current Fund Total $3,022 $3,022 Staff Positions and Salaries a. Restricted Position Employee Name Fulltime FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 Title * = Position Equivalent Last Year This Year Next Year 7,022 Vacant ** Actual Est'd. Budget rogram Coordinator Janet Peterson .50 $13,586 $7,800 $ 8,600 aseworker Diana Miller ,tonus '81 .511;rg, 4,543 4,815 10,600 iseworker xuU,ryn Asi'mulrun 1.00 - - 9,100 10.500 TOTAL SALARIES $18,129 $21,715 $29,700 TOTAL NO. PERSONNEL 2 3 3 3,002 TOTAL FULLTIME EQUIVALENTS 1.50 2.00 2,50 x.00 = Fulitime; .50 = Halftime; .25 = Quartertime, etc. Assets and Liabilities (From Most Recent Audit: Date Completed 7-1-80 Liabilities & Explanation Assets Fund Balances or Comment Current Fund Total $3,022 $3,022 All cash a. Restricted b. Unrestricted 3,022 7,022 Land, Buildings and Equipment Endowment Fund r'^ TOTAL - All Funds 3,022 3,002 ,dget approved�� of Executive Officer MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES I Autnorized OTricial Date p I ,';;cWt 2F,, 1980 ,.filler Flnd '.Lchard Porpuson Pr1L9 ProgrFen 3149 IIiphwav 218 voilth 10wR City, IA 522110 Dear titan and kichard, After a preliminary revleu of your hudreL• by Lite Allocution Division of 'b"ted tiny, the following errors have been detected: 1. Porn 1, line 2 hrus not been ^pled in. 2. Form 1, line 12n -g shoirld shov pro, -runt services. mun breakrioun for management and 3. !'one 3 should show 2rol` supporting services. 'j it. United !fay or iovn City doesn't belong on fon. 3, line 2. ' 5. For P.iscal. Year .1931-82 salary' figures do riot natah forms 3 and It, salary shouldn't be Included wider Propram Gervicen. G. Payroll taxes (lines 21 and 22), form 3, should be separated as indicated. Please return the budget after rectif,fin t the errors by September 5, 1980, I I . Thanks for your cooperation. 'Uticerely, 11ar7 Acme Voir, j Fxecutive Director i I MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES - .•;� I' i I a. i � t ,';;cWt 2F,, 1980 ,.filler Flnd '.Lchard Porpuson Pr1L9 ProgrFen 3149 IIiphwav 218 voilth 10wR City, IA 522110 Dear titan and kichard, After a preliminary revleu of your hudreL• by Lite Allocution Division of 'b"ted tiny, the following errors have been detected: 1. Porn 1, line 2 hrus not been ^pled in. 2. Form 1, line 12n -g shoirld shov pro, -runt services. mun breakrioun for management and 3. !'one 3 should show 2rol` supporting services. 'j it. United !fay or iovn City doesn't belong on fon. 3, line 2. ' 5. For P.iscal. Year .1931-82 salary' figures do riot natah forms 3 and It, salary shouldn't be Included wider Propram Gervicen. G. Payroll taxes (lines 21 and 22), form 3, should be separated as indicated. Please return the budget after rectif,fin t the errors by September 5, 1980, I I . Thanks for your cooperation. 'Uticerely, 11ar7 Acme Voir, j Fxecutive Director i I MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES - .•;� United Action for Youth, Inc. ADDRESS P.O. Box 892 Iowa City, Iowa 52244 1S COMPLETED BYJim Swaim, Dire r & M. Peg McElroy, Administr"�)Ive Coordinator 17ame and title TOTAL REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE SUi•5IARY FY 80 Actual Last Year FY 81 Projected This Year FY 82 Budgeted Next Year i I United Action for Youth, Inc. ADDRESS P.O. Box 892 Iowa City, Iowa 52244 1S COMPLETED BYJim Swaim, Dire r & M. Peg McElroy, Administr"�)Ive Coordinator 17ame and title TOTAL REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE SUi•5IARY MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES FY 80 Actual Last Year FY 81 Projected This Year FY 82 Budgeted Next Year Minus Beginning Balance 5 7,042 $ 6,369 $ -0- 5(6,369) a. Operating 6,212 6,055 -0- (6,055) b. Restricted 830 314 -0- ( 314) TOTAL Unrestricted Support 101,850 98,894 115,754 16,860 a. United Way 3,000 5,000 12,000 71-000- 000b. b. Iowa City 30,000 30,000 32,000 2,000 c. Johnson County 20,000 30X00 33,000 3,000 d. All Other 48,850 33.894 1 38,754 4 TOTAL Unrestricted Funds Carried Forward and Current (la + 2) $108,062 $104,949 $115,754 $10,805 TOTAL Restricted Support 2,723 2,916 -0- (2,916) a. Restricted by Donor 2,723 2,916 -0- 2,916 b. Designated by Board - _ TOTAL Restricted Funds Carried Forward and Current (lb + 4) 3,553 3,230 -0- (3,230) GRA14D TOTAL Funds Available (3 + 5) 5111,615 108,179 S115,754 $ 7,575 GRAND TOTAL Expenditures $105,246 108,179 S115,754 $ 7,575 a. Financed by Unrestricted Funds $102,007 104,949 115,754 10,805• b. Financed by Restricted Funds 3,239 3,230 -O- Ending Balance (6 - 7) 6,369 -0- -0- -0- Summary of Expenses and. Outlays Management and General $ 26,068 23,733 25,990 5 2,257 Payments to Affiliated Organizations I -- -- -- -- Major Proaerty & Equipment Acquisition 553 300 200 ( 100) Program Services 78;625 84,146 89,564 5,418 a, Outreach 40,876 45,439 48,262 2,823 b. C. d. e. f. g. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES Please indicate the specific fiscal year e. ) y ( 9•. Calendar 1981 or Ju�ys�$i - une 82 for which funds are des! -dated in items 1-4 Current Year Y 81 Budget Year 'FY 82 '1: Funds Restricted by Donor Source FY 81 FY 82 I! use Amount United Way of Johnson Count v Restricted to Outreach $2 916 Year Next Year + I L a TOTAL $2,9 -a- 2. Donations Restricted by Your Board ?i Restricted Use Amount Designated by Governing BThis Year Next Yearoard for Staff Development $ 314 -0- V • ` 3. Donated Services TOTAL $ 314 _0_ Service Hours Estimated Dollar Equivalent Consulting Artists - Synthesis This 50 Year Next Year This Year Nggxt Year 50 $ 500 b 500 TOTAL DOLLAR EQUIVALENT $ 500 4. Donated Materials E 500 }( Material Amount Material Estimated Dollar Value This Year Next Year This Year Next Year 'All Equipment, furnishings Several Several $ 500 $ 500 TOTAL DOLLAR VALUE $ 500 $ 500 5. Funds Generated through Grants having Matching Requirements Time Period Agency Providing AmountI of Grant Seed Money Seed Money ' Agency Providing Amount Budget Yaar FY V _ -0- Grant Grant �_--- -0' -0- Mb1TCH ---_" FOR TOTAL SEED MONEY -0- TOTAL GRANTS -0- TOTAL AMOUNT Generated through Grants (Total Seed Money + Total Grants) , i - MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES II S r. I 1,. i L u I 1,. i I ( , i I' . LL w 0 a c LL U f'. •-1 m P11 _ fl • C, Qci I _ ,7 'v �I Q O O 0 h U _ � ~ U L o 1 I I 1 S I 1 1 1 I 1 a N •N N co J I O s h � a u cocc s ft W c E a — - O > L 0) ` > O N � D 0 1- m o C u a o N v c ^a > L e n O v22 c � o COj v o ro O N V Y 9 Y L J a O co ~ Y r O • u u L q C O u G Y O$ ` M O L CL CL Lia M 7 P •. u c 9 L O•> Y ` N Fr O V Of W ' e C O • J 6 S K K L C S C i 7 W m a. IL MICHUHLMLU BY JORM MICR+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES I 1,. i I ( , i I' . L O 4- - JVMM MIVIYt uI m CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES �- I - 4 - ----------- - o - C L' u of OCP O O GJ M - C C w S DOnom N DIO ` G N INIJ O C! I a'• co00 C L n C CC) V ct 00 D O tD N S T t0 Ol l0 l0 F a r- 01 Ol N t0 co co N N N to U W 00 000 O 00 to 1- U D O R Ot Ot S 00 to p> M w O O tO N t0 L w O N l0 tp N O J N N N N H v o 0 0 ooa c000 0 "' N rn Oovi �no0o 0 N CT Q NOIR i� 000 O QI �� - Y. - r M n O � � N O Z G C t, l0 C' O oO O O co t O O Cn O� lO 1p l7 lP Mn OO O O V'10 m Ma00 00 to n ., .- D D ♦ft Ot t0 Q O �O W 00 M O: I` Cn O O 0 N J O +� 0) C C N � E r a) 0 a U N i C 0) -0 4- C ° Q n J T 0 L to i CL ml v 01 7) r 9 L Y L S .. ry O O O u L ♦ 4 Q 4 4 L: i O w- ` - 1 n V C O •� 4 L C W t C l Ov V v ♦. r L O �' t C :V= y V/ () O (.. 9 .t. T V � � r � C r 9 C F � r • V = = ( ^ • .} y � r C = l K _V 4J ♦rllll N uIL L O ♦� tl 1 L N L° u L O y i - C S •`� L` G 0. UJ h h h •C fy N O C C- N 1 A 0 < ^ I - JVMM MIVIYt uI m CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES 1 Position Title Director SUYXARY OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES Staff Positions and Salaries Employee Name Fulltime FY 80 * = Position Equivalent Last Year Vacant ** Actual Jim Swaim 1.0 $15,000 FY 81 FY 82 This Year Next Year Est'd. Budget $15,756 $17,200 11,844 12,610 15,000 Synthesis Coordinator Jim Elniski .63 - 1.0 .6.073 7.129 i Outreach Counselor Pat Fugate 1.0 10,200 10,816 13,200 Outreach Worker 1 Position Title Director SUYXARY OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES Staff Positions and Salaries Employee Name Fulltime FY 80 * = Position Equivalent Last Year Vacant ** Actual Jim Swaim 1.0 $15,000 FY 81 FY 82 This Year Next Year Est'd. Budget $15,756 $17,200 Adminictrativa rnnrd. M. Peg McElroy .75 - .50 8,339 6,691 7,200 Outreach Coordinator Craig Wunderlich 1.0 11,844 12,610 15,000 Synthesis Coordinator Jim Elniski .63 - 1.0 .6.073 7.129 13.2nn Outreach Counselor Pat Fugate 1.0 10,200 10,816 13,200 Outreach Worker Ethan Fox .60 - 1.0 3,969 4,785 10,000 oet;reaeh Wer-ker-- Studio Coordinator demrifel Nuhn- .58 Chuck Hollister .63 - .50 3,271 5,532 3,988 5,918 ---- 6,000 All Other ministrativ Various�-- I, TOTAL - All Funds $16,796 Sesretary- 1) '.50 -1,652 4'GGg- All Other Program ServiceVarious �lnian of Executive Officer Authorized Official Date .25-- 1.0 14,317 11,608 2,554 nc u es LLIA, Salary Conting Pnry Undpridorl -- -_ /� 1 nj n 9,jno Equivalents & Personnel reflect UAY TOTAL SALARIES 80.705 84,757 $90,554 regular staff - All other are CETA TOTAL NO. PERSONNEL 9 8 8 NYEP Staff TOTAL FULLTIME EQUIVALENTS 6.51 5.63 6.5 1.00 = Fulltime; .50 = Halftime; .25 = Quartertime, etc. • Assets and Liabilities FY 1979 (From Most Recent Audit: Date Completedaugust 21, 1979 ) Greenwood & Cri yp Liabilities & Explanation Assets Fund Balances or Comment Current Fund Total $ 7,042 $16,796 a. Restricted b. Unrestricted 7,042 16,796' Land, Buildings and ° Equipment 9,754 Endowment Fund k , I, TOTAL - All Funds $16,796 $16,796 E judget approved by: �lnian of Executive Officer Authorized Official Date V 1111 Zwd IIII, olreC for wan Lown, Ired5urer MICROFILMED BY ] JORM MICR+LAB { CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES M ■ City of Iowa C^y MEMORANDUM Date: October 10, 1980 To: City Council From: Doug BoothroxE�; Re: Planning & Zoning Items On October 21, 1980, Council should give second consideration to rezoning Jack I. Young's property from R1A to RX The Council gave first consideration to this item at their regular meeting of October 3, 1980. The Planning & Zoning Commission, at a regular meeting held October 2, 1980, recommended by a 4-0 vote approval of the preliminary plat, PAD, and Large Scale Residential Development plan of Court Hill -Scott Boulevard, Part 8, located south of Lower West Branch Road contingent upon submittal of a landscaping plan, Lot 2 being labeled as family care, facility, granting a variance in the Sidewalk Ordinance requiring sidewalks to be placed on one side of the street only, and the terracing with railroad ties along the single family lot lines to the west. This recommendation is consistent with the staff's recommendation presented in a staff report dated October 2, 1980, which is included in the Council's packet. On October 21, 1980 the Council will be requested to consider a resolution approving the above item. The applicant will be present at the informal meeting to answer any questions the Council might have regarding the subject PAD plan. Also at the regular meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission held October 2, 1980, the Commission recommended by a 5-0 vote that no recom- mendation be made -on the preliminary and final plat of Westview Acres, Part 2, because of the distance from Iowa City and the unlikelihood that Iowa City will annex the area in the near future. The subject subdivision was forwarded to the City of Iowa City for findings and recommendations per the 1972 annexation agreement between Iowa City and Coralville regarding subdivisions located outside Iowa City's two mile extraterritorial control area but within Coralville's and within Iowa City's side of the "area of jurisdiction". It was the staff's recommendation that due to the distance of the subdivision from the City of Iowa City (i.e. more than 2 miles) and the unlikelihood that the City will annex the area that the subject plat not be reviewed and therefore no recommendation be made to the City of Coralville. Those subdivisions located within two miles of the corporate limits of the City of Iowa City and within the "area of jurisdiction" should continue to be reviewed by the City and findings and recommendations forwarded to Coralville: bj5/1 MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAS CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES 1970 ~`---. ' -----\ i | | | / ` STAFF REPORT ! � Prepared by: UonaldSchmeiser ! Item/ S^80I2. Court Hill ~ Scott Blvd. Addition, � | � ' ; ` / ~`---. ' -----\ i | | | / ` STAFF REPORT ! To: Planning & Zoning Commission Prepared by: UonaldSchmeiser ! Item/ S^80I2. Court Hill ~ Scott Blvd. Addition, Date' � September 18 l98U � ` Part Vlll ! GENERAL� �----' / Applicant: i Bruce R. Glasgow � 834 N. Johnson � Iowa City` Iowa 52240 Requested action: � Approval of a preliminary plat | PAD and LSRD plan. ' Purpose: To develop sile family and attached single family residential units, ! Location: ' ` South of Lower West Branch Road. Size: 5,36 acres Comprehensive plan: � , ! 8reaisshown for adensity of2 to8dwelling units per acre. . !| Existing land use and zoning: Undeveloped and RIB. surrounding land use and zoning: East~ single family and RIB. South - attacked single family andPAD/Ql8. West ~ single family andRlB. North ~ undeveloped| and � � ` ` `��`� Applicable regulations: � ! Requirements of the Subdivision Code and the Stunnwater � | ranagement/ PAD and LS� Ordinances^ "° 45 -day limitation period: ~ � 10/16/80^ limitation 60 -day period: " � / i � l0/31/80 ' / SPECIAL INFORMATION Public utilities' �`- Adequate sewer and water service are available. ` Public services: � � Sanitary service is available as well as police and fire protection. . i � MICROFILMED BY ` CEDAR RAPIDS - DES MOINES � / VO r 2 1 Transportation: Vehicular access is proposed from Oberlin Street. Physical characteristics: Topography is gently to steeply sloping (2 to 16 per cent). ANALYSIS The subject development is a near replica of the development to the south with attached single family dwellings clustered around a cul-de-sac street. The low profile of the proposed buildings, with first floor elevations approximately 3-4 feet lower than the ground elevation of developed property to the west, would i appear to have diminutive impact upon existing single family residential development in the immediate vicinity. Although the property is zoned RIB, which permits a maximum density of development of 6,000 square feet per unit, the subject development incorporates an average of 7,711 square feet per unit. This density of development is consistent with existing single family lot sizes in the area (abutting single family lots vary from 7200 square feet to 7800 square feet). Of primary concern to the staff in the review of the subject development was the amount of separation deemed appropriate between the proposed buildings and abutting single family lots. This is a matter of conjecture but does require discrete judgment. Adequate separation in this instance is justified on the basis of privacy and visual impact and, to a lesser extent, noise. Of perhaps greater importance to the abutting property owners is the visual impact. The applicant has provided as much separation as is possible for this particular site design. This was accomplished in part by providing a 30 foot setback from Scott Boulevard. While a 30 foot setback departs from that which was required j for the development to the south, this setback was considered adequate in view of the requirement in the new proposed zoning ordinance that abutting a primary arterial street, a front yard or principal building setback of 40 feet be provided. Since the applicant is dedicating an extra 10 feet of street right-of-way than normally required for a primary arterial street, a 30 foot setback to Scott Boulevard, identified as a secondary arterial street on the Comprehensive Plan Map, is more than otherwise would be required under the new proposed regulations. I The staff would suggest that additional separation be provided between the proposed buildings and established single family lot lines by one or several of i the following alternatives: I. Increasing the distance of the building 38 feet from the lot line by decreasing the length of the driveway by 4 feet. This would provide a minimum separation of 42 feet. Extensive landscaping should be provided to reduce the visual impact. - \ I 2. Designing the buildings to the west of the cul-de-sac street with garages below grade. This would provide a minimum separation of 60 feet. i /970 MICROFILMED BY t JORM MICR+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES 0 3 3. Placing the garages at the street right-of-way line. This is not uncommon but less conventional and would require off-street parking bays. This alternative would provide a minimum separation of 60 feet. 4. Redesigning the buildings. The regulations for an OPO -H Zone proposed in the new zoning ordinance require that a minimum of 100 feet of separation be provided between buildings in the OPD -H Zone and boundary lines that are of a different use from that permitted in an adjacent single family residential zone. A 100 foot separation is not at all unreasonable for high intensity uses but would appear to be superfluous for attached single family dwellings in this instance. The staff felt that a minimum of 50 feet of separation should be provided. A second major concern that was voiced by adjacent property owners was the similarity between the design of buildings in this development and the develop- ment to the south. Arguably, the stylized nature of the two developments gives the appearance of a large tract development intruding the area. In discussions with the applicant, the staff saw less need for a sidewalk on both sides of the cul-de-sac street but did consider a sidewalk connection from the street to Scott Boulevard essential in view of internal and external pedestrian traffic circulation. A similar request for a variance in the construction of a sidewalk on both sides of a street was granted in the develop- ment immediately to the south. Finally, the applicant has mentioned that retaining walls would be constructed along the single family lot lines to the west. This proposal should be evaluated in terms of their impact upon the single family lots. RECOMMENDATION It is the staff's recommendation that consideration of the subject application be deferred pending discussion of the matters mentioned above. Final considera- tion should be incumbent upon the submission of a landscape plan in addition to the placement of trees meeting the tree regulations. ATTACHMENT Location map ACCOMPANIMENTS Preliminary plat, PAD and LSRD plan Approved by Dpnalo Sch�feiser , Acting Director Dept. of Planning & Program Development MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES 076 LOCATION MAP 5-012 04 ✓r 1, sr l T1 F MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LA6 CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES /970 ■ n MEMORANDUM IOWA CITY PUBLIC LIBRARY TO: City Council Members FROM: Lolly Eggers, Library Director R E : Display and meeting room policies DATE: October 6, 1980 The following is in response to your request for information about the library's display and meeting room policies especially as they relate to the current Iowa ERA display and to meetings on Transcendental Meditation. 1. IOWA ERA DISPLAY The display itself is entirely informational. It does not support or oppose the proposed amendment. It provides the language of the proposed change to the Iowa constitution and reminds citizens that it will be on the ballot on November 4. For a few days last week there were handouts from the Johnson County ERA Coalition at the display. They were placed there without our permission and were removed as soon as they were discovered. We regularly have to monitor all displays, pamphlet racks and bulletin boards and remove items put there without our knowledge and which do not meet library guidelines. Applicable sections from the Board of Trustees display policy: A. Purpose (of display facilities) 5. To highlight current issues and events of public interest. B. Guidelines....... 3. Political and religious displays shall be primarily informational. The theme should not attempt to persuade the viewer to take a position on a political or religious issue. (Continued) MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LA6 CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES i r Memo to City Council Members From Lolly Eggers, Library Director Page 2 2. TRANSCENDENTAL MEDITATION MEETINGS This organization has used the library's meeting rooms frequently since at least 1975 to provide the public with free introductory/informational lectures on TM. If "soliciting in the building" means getting names of attendees at the lectures who may be interested in further TM training, they probably do it regularly. Any other kind of "soliciting" - approaching people elsewhere in the building or asking for money at the lectures - is against library policy. To my knowledge, this has not occurred. The Board of Trustees meeting room policy is attached. If there are further questions, please notify me or Library Board President Lynda Ostedgaard. I MICROFILMED BY JORM MICFV+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES iiIt i Y 1 1 J, 1 I . j Memo to City Council Members From Lolly Eggers, Library Director Page 2 2. TRANSCENDENTAL MEDITATION MEETINGS This organization has used the library's meeting rooms frequently since at least 1975 to provide the public with free introductory/informational lectures on TM. If "soliciting in the building" means getting names of attendees at the lectures who may be interested in further TM training, they probably do it regularly. Any other kind of "soliciting" - approaching people elsewhere in the building or asking for money at the lectures - is against library policy. To my knowledge, this has not occurred. The Board of Trustees meeting room policy is attached. If there are further questions, please notify me or Library Board President Lynda Ostedgaard. I MICROFILMED BY JORM MICFV+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES r) I014A CITY PUBLIC LIBRARY r Policy Governing, Public Use of Meeting Rooms �. pMeeting rooms in the Iowa City Public Library are intended rimarily for the use of the library itself for programs and a conferences related to its civic, informational, educational, cultural and recreational services. The library is aware, how- ever, of the need for meeting places for community groups and feels it is an additional community service -to make them avail- able to community organizations and committees under the following conditions set by the Library Board. 1. Library programs and library related meetings shall have I first consideration in the scheduling of meeting rooms. I The library will be glad to consider requests from any group to sponsor or co-sponsor meetings or other activies in the public interest. 2. Rooms are not available for religious services or instruction, Private parties or for the benefit of private individuals or Profit making organizations. 3. Approval is granted only for a single meeting, or for a brief series o£ meetings. 4. There'is no fee for the use of library meeting rooms and groups using the rooms may not charge admission or take a collection. 5. Meetings must be open to the public. 6. Generally, the meeting rooms will be available for use during the hours the library is open. If the meeting will extend past regular library hours, the organization must arrange ahead Of time to employ a staff member to open and close $ supervise the building. 7. Simple refreshments may be served in the meeting rooms provided the room is left in the condition it was found. 8. The Library Board of Trustees or the City of Ioi,a City are not responsible for accidents, injury, or loss of individual property while using the meeting rooms. 9. Specific rules governing the use of the meeting rooms will be established and supervised by the Library Director. E MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES Adopted 8-28-75 Library Board of Trustees �I OLD CAPITOL CENTER Mr. Larry Chiat Development Coordinator City of Iowa City Civic Center 410 East Washington Street Iowa City, Iowa 52240 Dear Mr. Chiat: Subject: Progress Report OLD CAPITOL CENTER n October 7, 1980 THE DOWNTOWN ENCLOSED SHOPPING CENTER IOWA CITY. IOWA RECFI1'4z U tjLT 7 INV t Pursuant to your letter of September 26, 1980, and Section 304 of our Contract for Sale of Land for Private Redevelopment, we are herewith submitting a progress report on the referenced project: 1. All exterior work has been completed with the exception of window and door installations, gravel on the roof, and facing panels. 2. Work remaining to be completed includes the following: Interior masonry 5% Mall area 20% Mechanical 30%. Elevators 40% Roof 5% 3. Regarding construction schedule and completion of items listed above, we will continue to work as we have in the past and barring any unavoidable delays, we will complete all of the improvements covered by our Contract by the time called for in the Contract. 4,5. You have asked for a list of tenants committed to occupancy by way of a signed lease, and when each tenant will open for business. It is our opinion that our Contract for the Sale of Land for Private Redevelop— ment does not require that we furnish this information. Certainly no precedent has been set for this request. We do not mean to appear arbitrary in this regard, but it has been our policy, and in some cases it is written in our lease agreement, that the individual tenants will announce their leases at a time which coincides with their opening date. U. 310351.5276 Drawer, 1270 tows City, la. 52244 Tel. 312.348.5455 205 W. Wacker, Suite 202 Chicago. 111. 60806 MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB p CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES E G k t i l �a 1 €i ai F k I OLD CAPITOL CENTER Mr. Larry Chiat Development Coordinator City of Iowa City Civic Center 410 East Washington Street Iowa City, Iowa 52240 Dear Mr. Chiat: Subject: Progress Report OLD CAPITOL CENTER n October 7, 1980 THE DOWNTOWN ENCLOSED SHOPPING CENTER IOWA CITY. IOWA RECFI1'4z U tjLT 7 INV t Pursuant to your letter of September 26, 1980, and Section 304 of our Contract for Sale of Land for Private Redevelopment, we are herewith submitting a progress report on the referenced project: 1. All exterior work has been completed with the exception of window and door installations, gravel on the roof, and facing panels. 2. Work remaining to be completed includes the following: Interior masonry 5% Mall area 20% Mechanical 30%. Elevators 40% Roof 5% 3. Regarding construction schedule and completion of items listed above, we will continue to work as we have in the past and barring any unavoidable delays, we will complete all of the improvements covered by our Contract by the time called for in the Contract. 4,5. You have asked for a list of tenants committed to occupancy by way of a signed lease, and when each tenant will open for business. It is our opinion that our Contract for the Sale of Land for Private Redevelop— ment does not require that we furnish this information. Certainly no precedent has been set for this request. We do not mean to appear arbitrary in this regard, but it has been our policy, and in some cases it is written in our lease agreement, that the individual tenants will announce their leases at a time which coincides with their opening date. U. 310351.5276 Drawer, 1270 tows City, la. 52244 Tel. 312.348.5455 205 W. Wacker, Suite 202 Chicago. 111. 60806 MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB p CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES 4:1 VEENSTRA & KIMM, INC. F'N(;INFFRS I'I AiIFJCI;;' 1'•�r I:ANK I:UII.UIra' •S:r,l '.I lrl l l vi; .1 1911 McNeil, 'it, October October 6, 1980 i Neal G. Berlin City Manager City of Iowa City Civic Center 410 East Washington Street Iowa City, Iowa 52240 RIVER CORRIDOR SEWERS PROJECT WEEKLY PROGRESS SUMMARY NO. 12 This is to report progress on the River Corridor Sewers project for theweek ending October 4, 1980, and to provide information regarding the contrac Plans for the weeks ahead. tor's Eby continued the installation of 42 -inch pipe in Madison Street between Iowa Avenue and Bloomington Street in the vicinity of the Memorial Union. Crew No. 1, as of Friday night, had progressed into the Bloomington Street intersection. The trench will now be backfilled preparatory to paving and Crew No. 1 will move to Dubuque Street just north of Park Road. Crew No. 2, digging south from the Union, is within 100 feet of making the connection at Iowa Avenue. Affholder, Inc. has installed the shaft for the tunnel in Dubuque Street at Park Road. U&I Construction Company continued pouring driveways and sidewalks. Pouring of sidewalks was finished at the University Library and at the intersection of Madison and Washington. Installation of storm sewer was started an Madison between Market and polesiareoscheduledn. Work wto beas omoveded btheulatterof cpartiofsthis hweeeker poles. Those Madison Street has been paved from Prentiss to Court. The east half from Court to Burlington was also paved. The west half from Court to Burlington 1s i scheduled for paving on Thursday. Building of intakes and paving 1s now current with pipe laying. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES ( 1 Neal G. Berlin October 6, 1980 Page 2 It now appears that all of Madison Street will be paved to Bloomington Street by November 15. Stokes Landscaping plans to be in Iowa City on Tuesday, October 7, to arrange for sodding of disturbed areas. This work has been delayed several t1mes. i- i. is m j --'�.,1 -"111 ED OCT 6 DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT OMAHA AREA OFFICE �� IIIIIIII co. UNIVAC BUILDING, 7100 WEST CENTER ROAD ss •o,++ u ,�,+ OMAHA, NEBRASKA 68106 t October 2 1980 REGION VII � IN REPLY REFER TO: 7.2CM (B -81 -MC -19-0009) i' t F Mr. Neal G. Berlin City Manager Civic Center 410 East Washington Iowa City, Iowa 52240 Dear Mr. Berlin: This is to confirm our previous telephone contact with your staff informing the City that its Fiscal Year (FY) 1981 metropolitan cities funding mark under the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program has been estimated at $770,000. It must be recognized that this is only a preliminary estimate for planning purposes, and that it is subject to change. Once updated demographic information is received from the United States Bureau of the Census, a firmer figure will be produced and provided to you. As soon as you receive the final entitlement amount, you should substitute the latest figure for the earlier figure you have been using, regardless of the planning or application stage you are in at that time. The CDBG appropriation level approved by Congress could also have an effect on the above estimate. If the appropriation for FY 1981 is lower than requested, the final grant amount could drop. If any questions arise in preparing your application, please contact your Community Planning and Development Representative, Mr. William D. Clements, at (402) 221-9461. Sincerely, Nat uben Area Manager cc: Honorable John R. Balmer MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LA9 CEDAR RAPIDS + DES MOINES /979 i I i I I � I e 1 5 j --'�.,1 -"111 ED OCT 6 DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT OMAHA AREA OFFICE �� IIIIIIII co. UNIVAC BUILDING, 7100 WEST CENTER ROAD ss •o,++ u ,�,+ OMAHA, NEBRASKA 68106 t October 2 1980 REGION VII � IN REPLY REFER TO: 7.2CM (B -81 -MC -19-0009) i' t F Mr. Neal G. Berlin City Manager Civic Center 410 East Washington Iowa City, Iowa 52240 Dear Mr. Berlin: This is to confirm our previous telephone contact with your staff informing the City that its Fiscal Year (FY) 1981 metropolitan cities funding mark under the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program has been estimated at $770,000. It must be recognized that this is only a preliminary estimate for planning purposes, and that it is subject to change. Once updated demographic information is received from the United States Bureau of the Census, a firmer figure will be produced and provided to you. As soon as you receive the final entitlement amount, you should substitute the latest figure for the earlier figure you have been using, regardless of the planning or application stage you are in at that time. The CDBG appropriation level approved by Congress could also have an effect on the above estimate. If the appropriation for FY 1981 is lower than requested, the final grant amount could drop. If any questions arise in preparing your application, please contact your Community Planning and Development Representative, Mr. William D. Clements, at (402) 221-9461. Sincerely, Nat uben Area Manager cc: Honorable John R. Balmer MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LA9 CEDAR RAPIDS + DES MOINES /979 i I i I � I I U H. 1 RECL EO OCT 7 1980 Iowa CIly`—j Chamber of CoMM01,rce NOMI I �� P.O. Box :158 1"""""' I IOWA C I T Y, IOWA 61114 or PHONE 117.9617 U NIVttfl P 0I IOWA October 6, 1980 Neal Berlin, City Manager City of Iowa City Civic Center Iowa City, Iowa 52240 Dear Mr. Berlin, As you know, the Public Relations Committee of the Chamber of Commerce has initiated a contest for a symbol/slogan to represent our city. The contest ends this month. I had hoped to visit with you in comnitmeentsooutbut decided of town, andoourite timehis request constraints. to your The Public Relations Committee asks you to select a judge to re- present the city as we consider the entries next month. A judge will be expected to: 1. Have knowledge of Iowa City -past and present 2. Understand graphics and design (newspapers, exterior and interior signs, letterhead, invoices and business cards) 3. Appreciate visual and rhythmatic usage (T.V. and radio) 4. Help select a mark that will unify our image and economize our purchasing. We realize this presents a challenge, but with five other judges representing different segments of our city, it should be interesting and enjoyable. The judging will take place starting at 9:00 a,m. November 5, at the main office of First National Bank. Hopefully, only a couple of hours will be needed to attain the goal. With the desire and belief that our community can produce this symbol/slogan, we thank you for your community involvement. Please call me at Mercy, 337-0657, if you need further in- formation. Sincerely, O�'�l2' �'cCrl�aa✓ Linda Muston Public Relations Committee Chamber of Commerce Iowa City, Iowa 52240 MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES 7 7� N RECL EO OCT 7 1980 Iowa CIly`—j Chamber of CoMM01,rce NOMI I �� P.O. Box :158 1"""""' I IOWA C I T Y, IOWA 61114 or PHONE 117.9617 U NIVttfl P 0I IOWA October 6, 1980 Neal Berlin, City Manager City of Iowa City Civic Center Iowa City, Iowa 52240 Dear Mr. Berlin, As you know, the Public Relations Committee of the Chamber of Commerce has initiated a contest for a symbol/slogan to represent our city. The contest ends this month. I had hoped to visit with you in comnitmeentsooutbut decided of town, andoourite timehis request constraints. to your The Public Relations Committee asks you to select a judge to re- present the city as we consider the entries next month. A judge will be expected to: 1. Have knowledge of Iowa City -past and present 2. Understand graphics and design (newspapers, exterior and interior signs, letterhead, invoices and business cards) 3. Appreciate visual and rhythmatic usage (T.V. and radio) 4. Help select a mark that will unify our image and economize our purchasing. We realize this presents a challenge, but with five other judges representing different segments of our city, it should be interesting and enjoyable. The judging will take place starting at 9:00 a,m. November 5, at the main office of First National Bank. Hopefully, only a couple of hours will be needed to attain the goal. With the desire and belief that our community can produce this symbol/slogan, we thank you for your community involvement. Please call me at Mercy, 337-0657, if you need further in- formation. Sincerely, O�'�l2' �'cCrl�aa✓ Linda Muston Public Relations Committee Chamber of Commerce Iowa City, Iowa 52240 MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES 7 7� N Iowa City NOMI OF UNIVII111Y 01 IOWA 6 October 1980 n Chamber of Commerce (P.O. 10% 3351 IOWA CITY, IOWA 53344 PHONE 337.9637 You are cordially invited to attend d Chamber sponsored 'Women's Forum" October 28, 8:00 am, at the Recreation Center. This forum will consist of a forum of women involved in the Iowa City business community and will be open to questions from the public, as well as Chamber members. It is the aim of the Chamber to hear specific problems women have had in the business community or in dealing with the Chamber and to present pertinent information as to the role and purpose of the Chamber in the community. Your discussion and feedback will be encouraged and we in- vite you to bring a friend. The meeting will be one hour long and cof- fee will be served following. This will be the first of a series of forums dedling with women, minor- ities, aged, handicapped and foreign students. Won't you please support this effort and attend. If you have any questions please call 337-2601 or 337-9637. Sheri Alvarez-Heikens, Chairperson Affirmative Action Cominittee Iowa City Chamber of Commerce MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAE3 CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES y Iowa City NOMI OF UNIVII111Y 01 IOWA 6 October 1980 n Chamber of Commerce (P.O. 10% 3351 IOWA CITY, IOWA 53344 PHONE 337.9637 You are cordially invited to attend d Chamber sponsored 'Women's Forum" October 28, 8:00 am, at the Recreation Center. This forum will consist of a forum of women involved in the Iowa City business community and will be open to questions from the public, as well as Chamber members. It is the aim of the Chamber to hear specific problems women have had in the business community or in dealing with the Chamber and to present pertinent information as to the role and purpose of the Chamber in the community. Your discussion and feedback will be encouraged and we in- vite you to bring a friend. The meeting will be one hour long and cof- fee will be served following. This will be the first of a series of forums dedling with women, minor- ities, aged, handicapped and foreign students. Won't you please support this effort and attend. If you have any questions please call 337-2601 or 337-9637. Sheri Alvarez-Heikens, Chairperson Affirmative Action Cominittee Iowa City Chamber of Commerce MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAE3 CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES i MINUTES AFFIRMATIVE ACTION TASK FORCE OCTOBER 7, 1980 CITY MANAGER'S CONFERENCE ROOM MEMBERS PRESENT: Eggers (late: 10:09 a.m.); Keating (left: 11:55 a.m.); Kucharzak; Marcus; McCartt; Meisel; Miller (left: 11:44 a.m.); Orelup MEMBERS ABSENT: Yates STAFF: Carroll; Morris; Woito (late: 1058 a.m.) GUESTS: None RECOMMENDATIONS TO CITY COUNCIL: None. RECOMMENDATIONS TO CITY MANAGER AND STAFF: The task force would like a representative from the Purchasing Division to address the subject of contract compliance for bidding purposes at the next meeting. SUMMARY OF RELEVANT DISCUSSION: 1. The meeting was called to order at 10:06 a.m. by Chairperson, Bette Meisel. 2. Review of the Minutes: The minutes of September 30, 1980 were approve(Fa s read. 3. Discussion of the Grievance Procedure for Non-union Employee: Carroll volunteered to r� the�on the rrieva'nce Fr-o-c-e-cTuTe with the corrections made by the task force. The draft will be distributed at the next scheduled meeting. 4. Review of drafts on Recruitment Funds and the Recommendation that Statisti al Data be inc—' luded in to Aff ri mat ve�on Status Report: The d—scus is on was tabled until the next schedu a meet�- 5. PPre_l ''nary review of the Total Polic Package: Discussion will continue at the next meetlng. 6. Set Agenda for the next meeting: Review of the total Affirmative Action Policy Package will continue. Meisel asked the members to bring written suggestions they feel should be presented to City Council as recommendations. The Policy presentation to Council will also be discussed at the next meeting. 7. The meeting was adjourned at 12:13 p.m. The next scheduled meeting will be October 14, City Manager's Conference Room, 10:00 a.m. 1%;P% 1 i; MICROFILMED BY DORM MICR+LAB a -.R. CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES `1 I i 1 i i I n MINUTES OF STAFF MEETING October 1, 1980 Departmental referrals were distributed to the staff for review and discussion (copy attached). Items for the agenda of October 7 include: Resolution regarding remodeling of the third floor of the old post office. Selection of the consulting engineer for Lower Ralston Creek Improvements Resolution establishing just compensation for two parcels in the Lower Ralston Creek area Public hearing on disposal of three houses in the Ralston Creek area Public hearing on the Uniform Fire Code Resolution regarding Civic Center HVAC System Resolution regarding Court and Corridor Project downtown Resolution regarding Streetscape improvements Appointments to Board of Appeals The Assistant City Manager advised that two one-hour sessions are scheduled for October 8 to discuss the budget. Information will be distributed to the staff regarding performance criteria. All staff members were requested to attend one of the meetings. The Finance Director announced that the staff will be receiving budget manuals and blank forms next Monday. Payroll forms will not be Included at this time, and they will be furnished the next week. question and answer sessions are scheduled for Thursday afternoon and Friday morning, October 9 and 10, in the Conference Room. CPreared by: t twr r 2,C7XQf1 /!f �.E/ Lorraine Saeger MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAEI CEDAR RAPIDS - DES MOINES /97,F AI I i i I n MINUTES OF STAFF MEETING October 1, 1980 Departmental referrals were distributed to the staff for review and discussion (copy attached). Items for the agenda of October 7 include: Resolution regarding remodeling of the third floor of the old post office. Selection of the consulting engineer for Lower Ralston Creek Improvements Resolution establishing just compensation for two parcels in the Lower Ralston Creek area Public hearing on disposal of three houses in the Ralston Creek area Public hearing on the Uniform Fire Code Resolution regarding Civic Center HVAC System Resolution regarding Court and Corridor Project downtown Resolution regarding Streetscape improvements Appointments to Board of Appeals The Assistant City Manager advised that two one-hour sessions are scheduled for October 8 to discuss the budget. Information will be distributed to the staff regarding performance criteria. All staff members were requested to attend one of the meetings. The Finance Director announced that the staff will be receiving budget manuals and blank forms next Monday. Payroll forms will not be Included at this time, and they will be furnished the next week. question and answer sessions are scheduled for Thursday afternoon and Friday morning, October 9 and 10, in the Conference Room. CPreared by: t twr r 2,C7XQf1 /!f �.E/ Lorraine Saeger MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAEI CEDAR RAPIDS - DES MOINES /97,F AI Regular -Council fleeting DEPARTMENT September 30, 1980 REFERRALS I SUBJECT RE o REFTO DDUEDATE W W COMMENTS/STATUS Rezoning - Jack I. Young Property 9-30 Legal/ P&PD Will proposed use of this property create a sewer problem or area septic system overload? Absence 9-30 Info Glenn Roberts probably absent C on 10-6-80 (informal) Madison & Iowa 9-30 Public Wks Stop Signs - status? O I a MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LA6 y, CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES f. Y I Informs} Council Fleeting DEPARTMENT REFERRALS September 30, 1980 SUBJECT / DATE RECD REFERRED To DATE DUE W W COMMENTS/STATUS What is relation of policy to Building Use Policy 9-30 Library display supporting ERA. Informa- tion for Council regarding use for TM- wag tharp qn1irifinn in +6. building? Airport Hangar Project 9-30 Airport What is source of funding for project now out for bid? Maximum Lot Size 9-30 Legal Procedure for rebuilding on 40 -foot lot if dwelling is destroyed - relate to 50 -foot minimum lot width requirement. 0 MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LA9 CEDAR RAPIDS - DES MOINES i n MINUTES OF STAFF MEETING October 8, 1980 Referrals from the informal and formal Council meetings were distributed to the staff for review and discussion (copy attached). Items for the agenda of October 21 include: Recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission regarding preliminary plat of Court Hill -Scott Boulevard, Part 8 Recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission regarding Westview Acres Set public hearing for undergrounding of utilities in Central Business District - plans and specs Deferred contract for Lower Ralston Creek Project Resolution regarding third floor of the Senior Center Appointments to Resources Conservation Commission The staff was requested to keep the agenda for the November 4, 1980, meeting of the City Council as short as possible. The Assistant City Manager cautioned the staff regarding comments about the houses in the Lower Ralston Creek Project. The Assistant City Manager noted that a great number of travel requests have been processed during the past two weeks. Department heads were cautioned to watch their travel budgets. The Assistant City Manager announced that the new Assistant City Attorney, David Brown, would begin working on Thursday, October 9, 1980. The Director of Parks and Recreation suggested that a meeting be scheduled regarding this winter's snow removal program. The system will have to be changed since personnel changes have been made. The Director of Parks and Recreation also announced that the banner poles have been erected in City Plaza. Prepared by: '_.�J� , . i ,u 1. �J20 C)JL.t/ Lorraine Saeger V/1 I I: MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB !F CEDAR RAPIDS - DES MOINES 3� d n MINUTES OF STAFF MEETING October 8, 1980 Referrals from the informal and formal Council meetings were distributed to the staff for review and discussion (copy attached). Items for the agenda of October 21 include: Recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission regarding preliminary plat of Court Hill -Scott Boulevard, Part 8 Recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission regarding Westview Acres Set public hearing for undergrounding of utilities in Central Business District - plans and specs Deferred contract for Lower Ralston Creek Project Resolution regarding third floor of the Senior Center Appointments to Resources Conservation Commission The staff was requested to keep the agenda for the November 4, 1980, meeting of the City Council as short as possible. The Assistant City Manager cautioned the staff regarding comments about the houses in the Lower Ralston Creek Project. The Assistant City Manager noted that a great number of travel requests have been processed during the past two weeks. Department heads were cautioned to watch their travel budgets. The Assistant City Manager announced that the new Assistant City Attorney, David Brown, would begin working on Thursday, October 9, 1980. The Director of Parks and Recreation suggested that a meeting be scheduled regarding this winter's snow removal program. The system will have to be changed since personnel changes have been made. The Director of Parks and Recreation also announced that the banner poles have been erected in City Plaza. Prepared by: '_.�J� , . i ,u 1. �J20 C)JL.t/ Lorraine Saeger V/1 I I: MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB !F CEDAR RAPIDS - DES MOINES r Informal Council Meeting � October 6, 1980 i DEPARTMENT REFERRALS i �1 l � MICROFILMED BY - JORM MICR+LAB it CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES t' I w SUBJECT DATE REFERRED DATE § RECD DUE � F_ WMMENi WSTAnj W -- Sidewalk - Bowery and Gilbert 10-6 H&IS Check for deterioration and priority for repair. Truck embargo should be enforced Kirkwood Avenue Truck Traffic 10-6 Public Wks/ again. Check for signs in place.0 Police Issue news release and begin enfo nt. �10-6 Melrose Court Police ilPairoi when possible re. speed and — -if---- i! stop si^ns. Industrial Development Revenue Bonds 10-6 Finance j I Follow �' p on policy draft to Council. Notify Lenock & Cilek no action by Council until policy review one month .a roximatel . Informal scussron on - O-8 . Elm Grove Park 10-6 Parks & Rec Report for Council: 1 Extent of use of tennis courts. 2 How can parcel be dive a or sale of part? 3) What would it be zoned if soldli� Invite Parks and Recreation Commis- s on to informal session To scuss sale. General Revenue Sharing 10-6 Finance/ 1) Letter to agencies regarding Assistant C1 possible funding cut. 2) Contact congressional representa- Old Capitol Center 10-6 P&PD Status of report to Council. Expedite. J i �1 l � MICROFILMED BY - JORM MICR+LAB it CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES t' I Informal Council Meeting October. 6,1980 DEPARTMENT REFERRALS f r -^ a SUBJECT D REFERRED DATE W U W 1 COWOMMENWSTATUS Spruce Street Drainage 10-6 Public Wks Status of Problem/solution. Coralville Power Dam 10-6 Lorraine Clemens and David to attend meeting. Informal discussion on� 10-13-80. Constitutional Convention Resolution 10-6 Lorraine For 10-21-80 agenda. Convert to our standard resolution form. Street Siren 10-6Rider Finance Draft letter to School Board from Mayor re, moving unit west along fence. Storm Drainage - Dearborn and Center 10-6 Public Wks Clear catch -basins. Chuck to suggest to Council further remedies for future informal discussion. j. i i I i IV 1 11 a 1 MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS - DES MOINES I 1 11 Regular Council Meeting October 7, 1980 DEPARTMENT REFERRALS MICROFILMED BY 7, JORM MICR+LAB `� CEDAR RAPIDS - DES MOINES u SUBJECT DATE RECD REFERRED TO DATE WE � � � CWMENISTATUS W � Implication re, rezoning for future Jack I. Young Property 10-7 PBPD obligations to furnish water and sewer, Lower Ralston Creek Project 10-7 H&IS/ Regarding houses to be sold for —. moving: Is any funding available.. Finance for City to move and rehab for assisted housin in 1 Assisted Housing Program 2) Public Housing Program 3) From dollars not used to rehab Iowa Glass Building. Virginia Drive Barricade 10-7 Public Wks Why was new barricade installed? Does it currently comply with LSNRD as approved by Council re, trees, Eastdale Mall 10-7 PBPD parking, etc.? Around Old Capitol Center. What t+?ps Curb Damage 10-7 Public Wks now or later to get repairs to da e from construction? Who is responYble H&IS/ In newer subdivisions, who is Settling Sidewalks 10-7 Public Wks responsible for repairing settling due to utilities underneath causing sin i g Rohret Road 10-7 Public Wks Check for deterioration or washout in area between Stevens and Carson properties, Ordinance changing South Gilbert to Waterfront Drive 10-7 Public Wks Waterfront Drive passed and adopted. MICROFILMED BY 7, JORM MICR+LAB `� CEDAR RAPIDS - DES MOINES n PALS PROGRAM (Big Brothers/Big Sisters of Johnson County) QUARTERLY REPORT October 1, 1980 Boys matched with Big Brothers Girls matched with Big Sisters Boys matched with Couples TOTAL CHILDREN MATCHED New Matches this Quarter Terminations this Quarter Average length of existing matches SERVICES THIS QUARTER /l/80 7/1/80 lull, 46 46 45 27 24 26 1 1 1 10 68 7 10 2 19 mos. 19 mos. 18 mos. 21 mos. 20 mos. 21 mos. *Monthly newsletter to parents, volunteers, and children. *Monthly orientation for prospective volunteers. *Training workshop for new volunteers. *Orientation for G.A.P. volunteers *Honthly Board meetings and on-going committee work. *Complimentary tickets provided for Pals to Jaycees' Christie Lane concert. *Three boys.from waiting list sent to Jaycees' Boys Camp. *Overnight camp -out for Pals. *Two public speaking appearances by Coordinator. *Consultation services: "Friends" of Iowa City Big Brothers/Big Sisters of Marshall County *staff training: Training for People Who Help in the Home," Cedar Rapids Big Brothers/Big Sisters of America Regional Conference STAFF, BOARD, AND PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT KATE ASPENGREN joined our staff as a full-time caseworker in July. Kate has worked for the past three years as a caseworker for Catholic Social Service in Des Moines. She worked primarily with'young unwed pareand nts adoptions. Kate's casework skills are excellent. She is very enthusiastic MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LA6 CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES 1 -�I i i n PALS PROGRAM (Big Brothers/Big Sisters of Johnson County) QUARTERLY REPORT October 1, 1980 Boys matched with Big Brothers Girls matched with Big Sisters Boys matched with Couples TOTAL CHILDREN MATCHED New Matches this Quarter Terminations this Quarter Average length of existing matches SERVICES THIS QUARTER /l/80 7/1/80 lull, 46 46 45 27 24 26 1 1 1 10 68 7 10 2 19 mos. 19 mos. 18 mos. 21 mos. 20 mos. 21 mos. *Monthly newsletter to parents, volunteers, and children. *Monthly orientation for prospective volunteers. *Training workshop for new volunteers. *Orientation for G.A.P. volunteers *Honthly Board meetings and on-going committee work. *Complimentary tickets provided for Pals to Jaycees' Christie Lane concert. *Three boys.from waiting list sent to Jaycees' Boys Camp. *Overnight camp -out for Pals. *Two public speaking appearances by Coordinator. *Consultation services: "Friends" of Iowa City Big Brothers/Big Sisters of Marshall County *staff training: Training for People Who Help in the Home," Cedar Rapids Big Brothers/Big Sisters of America Regional Conference STAFF, BOARD, AND PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT KATE ASPENGREN joined our staff as a full-time caseworker in July. Kate has worked for the past three years as a caseworker for Catholic Social Service in Des Moines. She worked primarily with'young unwed pareand nts adoptions. Kate's casework skills are excellent. She is very enthusiastic MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LA6 CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES 1 0 1-1\ 1_-, -2- about the Pals Program, and has already proven to be a valuable addition to our staff. The Pals Coordinator returend from maternity leave in mid-June and is currently working half-time. Our staff has been reorganized so that the Coordinator's job is now administrative and supervisory while the case- workers (one full and one half-time) manage the case load. We have expanded our Board and added several new members. A current list of the Pals Board is attached to this report. In the coming year, the Board plans to focus on developing our fund-raising strategy, re- cruitment of children and volunteers, devising methods of service delivery evaluation, providing more in-service training for volunteers, and completion of.our long-range plans. The Pals small group program for children on the waiting list (G.A.P.) got underway this quarter. MARGIE STANGL, Urban 4-H Aide, will be the G,A.P. Coordinator for the Pals Program. Ten student leaders have been selected and prepared for the semester. Seventeen children will be participating in G.A.P. this semester. VOLUNTEERS We received 40 new volunteer inquiries this quarter; 19 male, 20 female, 1 couple. 60% of the inquiries attended orientation -- half male, half female. WAITING LIST There are 39 children currently waiting to be matched with a Big Brother or Big Sister -- 30 boys., 9 girls. 20% of the children on the waiting list at this time are from outside of the Iowa City/Coralville area, including Oxford, Tiffin, North Liberty, Lone Tree, and Hills. Respectfully submitted, Jan Peterson Pals Coordinator MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES j i.: i; C1 , i i 0 1-1\ 1_-, -2- about the Pals Program, and has already proven to be a valuable addition to our staff. The Pals Coordinator returend from maternity leave in mid-June and is currently working half-time. Our staff has been reorganized so that the Coordinator's job is now administrative and supervisory while the case- workers (one full and one half-time) manage the case load. We have expanded our Board and added several new members. A current list of the Pals Board is attached to this report. In the coming year, the Board plans to focus on developing our fund-raising strategy, re- cruitment of children and volunteers, devising methods of service delivery evaluation, providing more in-service training for volunteers, and completion of.our long-range plans. The Pals small group program for children on the waiting list (G.A.P.) got underway this quarter. MARGIE STANGL, Urban 4-H Aide, will be the G,A.P. Coordinator for the Pals Program. Ten student leaders have been selected and prepared for the semester. Seventeen children will be participating in G.A.P. this semester. VOLUNTEERS We received 40 new volunteer inquiries this quarter; 19 male, 20 female, 1 couple. 60% of the inquiries attended orientation -- half male, half female. WAITING LIST There are 39 children currently waiting to be matched with a Big Brother or Big Sister -- 30 boys., 9 girls. 20% of the children on the waiting list at this time are from outside of the Iowa City/Coralville area, including Oxford, Tiffin, North Liberty, Lone Tree, and Hills. Respectfully submitted, Jan Peterson Pals Coordinator MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES j i.: i; r PALS BOARD, FY81 Don Benda, President - Former elementary school principal Dick Ferguson, -Vice -President - A.C.T., Vice President Stan Miller, Financial Manager - C.P.A.; McGladrey, Hendrickson, partner; former Pals volunteer Dave Bousfield, Secretary - Special Education Teacher, Lemme School; former Pals volunteer Jim Leighton - Consulting Engineer, Shoemaker Haaland Dick Sjolund - U. of I., Assoc. Professor; Pals volunteer Linda Bunten - U. of I., Sponsored Programs; Pals parent Ann Anderson - U. of I., Radiation Protection Joe Curtis - Protective Services Supervisor, Dept, of Social Services Charles Abel - Coordinator, Child Abuse & Neglect Resource Center John Knutson - U. of I., Assoc. Professor, Psychology Wendy Gronbeck - Communications Training Kim W611 - U. of I., Asst. Director of Production, Audio-visual Center Elizabeth. Clancy Hoehne - KRNA, Producer, Afternoon News and Community Affairs Kay Brown - U. of I., Editor, Humanities/Science News Service Bill Wirth, Ex -officio - State Farm Insurance, Pals Volunteer i I, MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES How hOTeimmotel tax helps C.R.'s cultural activities L°' Cedar Rapids' first stab at a local option tax has been very satisfac. tory, says Mayor Don Canney. The mayor calls the hotel -motel tax a "tremendous asset," noting It's the first time people from outside the city who use our facllltles have helped pay some of the expenses. The hotel -motel tax is the first local option tax (and the only one so far) permitted by the Iowa Leglala. ture. Presently, only 14 cities and one county In the state have Imple. mented the tax. Y Under the law, a maximum tax of 7 percent can be Imposed on hotel. motel rooms. The tax must first be approved by a majority vote of the people in the city or county for which the tax Is proposed. Cedar Rapids voters approved the imposl- tion of a 5 percent room tax at the general election In November 1978, by a vote of 12,836 to 10,830. Collection of the tax began on April 1, 1979. THE TAX Is collected by the state, computed and sent back quarterly to cities and counties Imposing It. Under state law, at least 50 percent of the money collected by titles from the hotel -motel tax must be spent on recreational, cultural or entertainment activities or facilities. The remainder may be used for lawful discretionary expenditures. Initial estimates Indicated the tax might 'bring Cedar Rsplds about $275,000 annually. However, the city received $456,129.99 lest fiscal -year (1980), the first year the tax was collected. That total Includes pay- ments from the last quarter of• fiscal 1979 (April, May and June);dhe first quarter In which collection began. It's estimated that Cedar Rapids will get $500,000 from the room tax this fiscal year. During fiscal 1980, the city dis. bursed $437,562.66 of the $156; 120.99. The Five Seasons Center received $200,000 to help make up Its operational deficit; the Para. mount Theatre got $90,000; the Cedar Rapids Area Convention and Vialtoei Bureau $65,000; Cedar Rapids Art Center'$64,7S0;'.Witwer Senior Citizen's Center (a Ilan Dick Hogan City Noll rworur County project) $25,000; and the Indian Creek Nature Center $2; 812.56, leaving a balance of $17; 567.43. According to Bill Kinney, deputy city auditor, Cedar Rapids has received a payment of $114,791.65 In hotel -motel taxes during the current fiscal year (1981). Of that amount, $21,000 has been disbursed. The Convention and Visitors Bureau received $13,500; $1,250 went to the Cedar Rapids -Marion Fine Arts Council; and $6,260 went to the Indian Creek Nature Center. I Although only 50 percent of the funds collected from the hotel -motel tax Is required to go for recreational. entertainment expenses, practically all of the tax money Ceder Rapids receives has gone for these expenses. Mayor 'Carney noted that a survey conducted for the Chamber of Commerce In either 1969 or 1970 said Cedar Rapids' biggest need at that time was more cultural activl ties. "Since that time, we've come a long way with cultural development, and I think the Five Seasons Center has done a great deal toward that,". Canney said. The hotel -motel tax means'lhat property tax money does not have to .be used to support the Art Center or Paramount Theatre, the mayor com. mented. But Canney Bald -he's can. ferring with representatives of the various cultural organizations on how to possibly make the•organtra• tions self-supporting. Canney said one possibility for the Art Center would be the; city taking over ownership and maims• nance of Its building. net would take the building off the tax rolls, which, coupled, with the city assum- Ing the maintenance responsibllklsa, would contdltuts some cost to the MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAE] CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES city. But Canney geld It's a very. small cost. He added that the Art Center's board and the City Council have not, and alight not, agree to such a possibility and he was using It as an example,, Getting the Paramount to a self. supporting status will be difficult. The Cedar Rapids Symphony uses It for practice and concerts at a reduced rate, the mayor pointed out. If the rates were raised, the sym- phony would "go In the hole. Remember too, an awful lot of private dollars went into the restora. tion of the Paramount" THE CEDAR Rapids Community Theatre Is currently self-supporting but needs a larger, facility, Canney said. If the organization hes to build a new facility, It could wind up in debt and need support. Canney said that's why he liked the plan that would have allowed the Community Theatre to use the present library bullding,'If the bond Issue for a new library had passed. Under the plan, the theater would not have'to go In debt for a new building and would have paid the city a minimal lease. The city would get its remodeling Investment back over the long haul,' Canney said. Carney said the city Is Interested In helping provide cultural oppor. tunities for the community, but wants to "keep the burden off the Property taxpayers." &6&4) 4aLi& Cr�JZZ 0O /O.5 -Io WE In where a . current v,o a:eaar Raplda Art Center, Finland: 200 exhibition, RYl?Y Rugs from Iowans' attention. g of Textile Art," Is attracting runwos Mr. and Mrs. Robert Bloedel of Tabor. one of he art ce are received $86,000 from the city in fl art Ceptor acal 1980. coder Repfds/Sunday, Oct 6 t980 11A That's why the city uses the hotel -motel tax money to su pport these organizations. revenueIt also frees up -sharing money that was used in the Past to help support some of the cultural organizations, allowing the revenue-sharing money to be used for capital expenditures, the mayor explained. It's estimated I Cedar Rapids will collect $500,000 from the room tax during the current fiscal Year. NICROPILMED BY JORM MICRmLAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES Id01nES W IOWA CITY MUNICIPAL AIRPORT South Riverside Drive Iowa City, Iowa 52240 Office Phone (319) 354-1800 Ext. 357 Ite: October 10, 1980 To: City Council From: Fred Zehr, Airport Manager Re: Proposed Hangar There seem to be some unanswered questions about the intentions of the Airport Commission in its quest to invest the $90,000 in its capital improvements fund. The terms under which these funds were accepted by the City are very strict; these terms were agreed to by the City Council, not the Airport Commission. They only allow the money to be spent for capital improvements on the airport that will benefit the flying public. Allowable uses include new taxiways, aircraft parking aprons, hangars, nav-aids, and fuel farms, to mention a few. Most of the allowable uses would not in turn provide further revenue. They cannot be used as matching funds for ADAP programs, or for any operational or maintenance expenses. So, as you can see, the Airport Commission is very limited in its use of the funds. Also, the Commission is under a time limit for using this money. Under the contract, the money has to be used by the beginning of 1981. Although this time limit could be extended for extraordinary circumstances, it would not be in the City's best interest for us to procrastinate. With inflation creeping up every month, the buying power of our capital improvements fund is diminishing. The Airport's goal to become self sufficient is the primary reason for the decision to build a hangar. The Airport Commission could use this money to build taxiways or parking aprons, but it feels this is not effective planning. The decision to invest this money in a hangar is the most reasonable because we will see a return on the investment of $12,000 to $15,000 per year when the hangar is completed. In addition, it should be noted that taxiways, parking aprons, and nav-aids are eligible for funding under other programs but hangars are not. True, we do not have the funding to finish the hangar completely—,but—the $90,000 we do have should give us a usable hangar that will start to generate revenue. This revenue could be reinvested to complete the hangar. The planned hangar is a four unit T -hangar designed to house larger cabin class aircraft. This type of hangar is desperately needed at the Iowa City Airport. The south end of the hangar is designed "oversize" to accommodate the University of Iowa Aircare helicopters for storage and maintenance. This unit and two others will have an office and restroom facilities. In the north end of the hangar is a bay to be used as the Airport's maintenance shop and a small office for the Airport Manager. These facilities are also badly needed. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES i I i 'I IOWA CITY MUNICIPAL AIRPORT South Riverside Drive Iowa City, Iowa 52240 Office Phone (319) 354-1800 Ext. 357 Ite: October 10, 1980 To: City Council From: Fred Zehr, Airport Manager Re: Proposed Hangar There seem to be some unanswered questions about the intentions of the Airport Commission in its quest to invest the $90,000 in its capital improvements fund. The terms under which these funds were accepted by the City are very strict; these terms were agreed to by the City Council, not the Airport Commission. They only allow the money to be spent for capital improvements on the airport that will benefit the flying public. Allowable uses include new taxiways, aircraft parking aprons, hangars, nav-aids, and fuel farms, to mention a few. Most of the allowable uses would not in turn provide further revenue. They cannot be used as matching funds for ADAP programs, or for any operational or maintenance expenses. So, as you can see, the Airport Commission is very limited in its use of the funds. Also, the Commission is under a time limit for using this money. Under the contract, the money has to be used by the beginning of 1981. Although this time limit could be extended for extraordinary circumstances, it would not be in the City's best interest for us to procrastinate. With inflation creeping up every month, the buying power of our capital improvements fund is diminishing. The Airport's goal to become self sufficient is the primary reason for the decision to build a hangar. The Airport Commission could use this money to build taxiways or parking aprons, but it feels this is not effective planning. The decision to invest this money in a hangar is the most reasonable because we will see a return on the investment of $12,000 to $15,000 per year when the hangar is completed. In addition, it should be noted that taxiways, parking aprons, and nav-aids are eligible for funding under other programs but hangars are not. True, we do not have the funding to finish the hangar completely—,but—the $90,000 we do have should give us a usable hangar that will start to generate revenue. This revenue could be reinvested to complete the hangar. The planned hangar is a four unit T -hangar designed to house larger cabin class aircraft. This type of hangar is desperately needed at the Iowa City Airport. The south end of the hangar is designed "oversize" to accommodate the University of Iowa Aircare helicopters for storage and maintenance. This unit and two others will have an office and restroom facilities. In the north end of the hangar is a bay to be used as the Airport's maintenance shop and a small office for the Airport Manager. These facilities are also badly needed. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES I The original plan for financing the completion of the hangar was to use the revenue generated by the partially completed structure. If this does not work, it may be possible to enter into a general obligation bond with another city department. Discussions with Rosemary Vitosh, City Finance Director, indicated that this is possible with Council approval. It should be understood that the Airport Commission is not committed to building this hangar. The bidding process is designed to give them a firm ground on which to base their decision. The decision to build or not will be determined by how high or how low the bids are when they come in. The Airport Commission does not intend to impose any additional burdens on the City Council in the building of this hangar, and we feel that we have been keeping you posted on the progress of our hangar plans through our monthly meeting minutes and our newsletter. With the issuance of a general obligation bond to make up the difference in the cost of the hangar, we would still realize $6,000 to $7,000 per year additional operating revenue. If the Council does not approve the general obligation bond idea, the Commission would ask the Council to grant us the needed $60,000. If the Commission does not utilize its $90,000 within the allotted time (Harch 6, 1981), these funds will revert to the State DOT. The Commission hopes it has your support in its quest to become a self- sufficient entity, and this hangar could be a positive step in that direction. bc4/1 cc: Neal Berlin Rosemary Vitosh MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES i i i r` I, I The original plan for financing the completion of the hangar was to use the revenue generated by the partially completed structure. If this does not work, it may be possible to enter into a general obligation bond with another city department. Discussions with Rosemary Vitosh, City Finance Director, indicated that this is possible with Council approval. It should be understood that the Airport Commission is not committed to building this hangar. The bidding process is designed to give them a firm ground on which to base their decision. The decision to build or not will be determined by how high or how low the bids are when they come in. The Airport Commission does not intend to impose any additional burdens on the City Council in the building of this hangar, and we feel that we have been keeping you posted on the progress of our hangar plans through our monthly meeting minutes and our newsletter. With the issuance of a general obligation bond to make up the difference in the cost of the hangar, we would still realize $6,000 to $7,000 per year additional operating revenue. If the Council does not approve the general obligation bond idea, the Commission would ask the Council to grant us the needed $60,000. If the Commission does not utilize its $90,000 within the allotted time (Harch 6, 1981), these funds will revert to the State DOT. The Commission hopes it has your support in its quest to become a self- sufficient entity, and this hangar could be a positive step in that direction. bc4/1 cc: Neal Berlin Rosemary Vitosh MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES i i City of Iowa Cho' MEMORANDUM DATE: October 17, 1980 TO: City Council FROM: City Manager RE: Material in Friday's Packet Memoranda from the City Manager: a. National Publications - Iowa City b. Annual Meeting of Boards and Commissions with City Council Copy of Mayor's letter to Iowa DEQ regarding the public hearing on EPA Construction Grants Program. Copy of City Manager's letter to Mr. Milton Rosebaum regarding traffic signals at Gilbert Street and Iowa Avenue. Memorandum from Doug Doothroy regarding LSRD Plan of Ralston Creek Village Memorandum from Finance Director regarding natural gas compression equipment Memorandum from the Director of Parks and Recreation regarding Elm Grove Par River Corridor Sewers Project Weekly Progress Summary, No. 13 ' -Z Letter from the Design Review Committee regarding a symposium, "Buildings Reborn: New Uses, Old Places." Police Department Monthly Report News re lease regarding Urban Mass Transportation Management Seminar. The Energy Saver, October 1980. Memo from Housing Coordinator re Public Housing IA 22-3 Memo from Housing Coordinator re Public Housing Site Review for Kirkwood Avenue Memo from City Manager re Ground Breaking, Ecumenical Housing MICROFILMED BY r JORM MICR+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES M f I •t MICROFILMED BY r JORM MICR+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES M a I 4J I •t a I 4J I a.. ^'City of Iowa C% MEMORANDUM Date: October 17, 1980 To: CityC uncil From: City nager Re: National Publications - Iowa City (articles attached) Recently Iowa City was mentioned in two national publications. The first article appeared in the October 6, 1980, edition of the U.S. News and World Report. You will note that on the second page the article mentions Iowa City's policy relating to City Council contract.with cable TV bidders and the financing by the cable TV company of the local studio for public access programming. The second item appears in the October, 1980, issue of Money magazine. A series of articles discusses the financial and growth futures for small communities. Ten communities are profiled in one of the articles and then in another section of the magazine concerning investment possibilities, there are five other communities mentioned including Iowa City. The Money articles would seem to support the position that, in the years .immediately ahead, Iowa City will become the target for significant growth. C cc: Planning & Zoning Commission Don Schmeiser bj/sp MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS - DES MOINES If 0 M J i a.. ^'City of Iowa C% MEMORANDUM Date: October 17, 1980 To: CityC uncil From: City nager Re: National Publications - Iowa City (articles attached) Recently Iowa City was mentioned in two national publications. The first article appeared in the October 6, 1980, edition of the U.S. News and World Report. You will note that on the second page the article mentions Iowa City's policy relating to City Council contract.with cable TV bidders and the financing by the cable TV company of the local studio for public access programming. The second item appears in the October, 1980, issue of Money magazine. A series of articles discusses the financial and growth futures for small communities. Ten communities are profiled in one of the articles and then in another section of the magazine concerning investment possibilities, there are five other communities mentioned including Iowa City. The Money articles would seem to support the position that, in the years .immediately ahead, Iowa City will become the target for significant growth. C cc: Planning & Zoning Commission Don Schmeiser bj/sp MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS - DES MOINES If 0 M In Scramble to Bring Cable Tlfto Your Area— There's big money to be made In wiring U.S. homes for a broader choice In television viewing. Result: A fight to win over local residents. One of the hottest battles In business today is the struggle to bring cable television into America's homes. It's a fight that pits aggressive cable companies against each other in an all. out campaign to woo local residents and city officials. Their weapons: Court fights, payoffs and plenty of old-fash. ioned wheeling and dealing. At stake are shares in an expanding, lucrative market. From its beginning 90 years ago as a vehicle for sending television signals to remote ureas, cubic coverage has spread to 22 percent of life viewing audience. Industry reve- nues arc expected to reach 2.4 billion dollars this year and 5 billion by 1985. The catch is that the dollars do not start Rowing until it local government awards a fr:mchile to one of the many companies that usually bid on it job. Growth of Those decisions are now being mad by dozens of communities, often undo storms of controversy and legal battles Typical is the situation in Pittsburgh where communications giants Warner Amex and ATC of Time, Inc., are stil in court months after the franchise to bring cable to the city was awarded t Warner. In that dispute, one local grow pushed the cause of ATC with llfayo Richard Caliguiri, while another lob bied the City Council on behalf o Warner. ATC, the loser in the lug of war, claims in its suit that the award of the franchise to Warner -Amex was "based on arbitrary, capricious, unlawful and Irrelevant considerations." A federal grand jury is looking at whether improprieties were involved in the award of the franchise, which could generate 100 million dollars for Warner in its first 15 years. In Texas, another federal grand jury is nosy examining how five cable fran. Houston were awarded in ouston lust your. There, Storer Broadcasting and cable television has grown to serve t of every 5 homes With TV sets. YYJAQw a,.9a rrt.v AWFW,'piyyxrvnafa+mea U.S NEWS & WORLD REPORT, Oct. 9, 1980 o MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAO CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES W :r bought majority positions in two of the franchises after they were awarded, gaining access to 80 percent of the city's 1.5 million population without ever having to preview their services for the public. Says Robert Sadowski, who served as a cable -TV consultant to the city: "1t e was apparent that some of the uppii- r cants were doing nothing more than getting paper franchises that they could turn around and sell." In addition to the grand -jury Investi- gation, William Coldberg, a Houston developer, Is suing the former mayor o and City Council and the winning ca- ble company for 2.6 million dollars. He p claims he was unfairly denied a chance r to provide cable television for a part of the city he helped develop. F Buying support. Elsewhere, observ. ers complain that cable companies are resorting to "rent a citizen" tactics by offering prominent residents shares in their firms in exchange for support. In Fairfax County, Va., for example, a for- mer county supervisor could earn sev. eml million dollars—without having to invest o cent of his own money—from a 7 percent interest in it company bid. ding on a Fairfax franchise. Says a lawyer involved in it franchise battle in another Washington, D.C., suburb: "If there's it cable fight, and you don't have it 2 percent interest in somebody's bid, you're if nobody." Critics charge that the rent -u -citizen idea hurts the general public,.sincu fr:nt- chisers will try to make up for the shares given local supporters through higher charges to cable subscribers. In many small coin nut fit ties, the competition can pit friend against friend, making decisions all the arore troublesome. For example, in t.ocs. burg, Va., citizens lobbied that town's five -member City Council on behalf of five competing cable firms. necalls Councilman C. Dewey (till: "In nay case, my landlord was on one of the ca. blo-company boards. As it turns out, f voted against his company. It was one of the toughest decisions I've ever had to make." Millions at stake. While the. rent -u - citizen practice is nol illegal, both ca- ble operators and local Officials udntil the potential for corruption is great. A Pittsburgh journalht recalls how ha du- cRned a "salrhel full of bill" offered by officers of one, ennpsauy in return for his influence.. Explains one cablO-company officer: "We're talking about projects that range In costs from 10 million to fill mil. lion dollars. What's another •9100,000 under the table?" Industry observers also are carrt- ccrned that local citizens are being ex. 47 plaited by cable operators who n promises about glittering services and equipment, but fail to rlelivcr. Says Ihnold Ilurn of the Cable Television Infurmatiun Center. "The potential for bait and switch is great.,. Oficn, residents and local official are confused by all the services prom ised in cable. packages. In Dallas, fo example, six cable companies are cum- peting for a franchisc— each with a dib ferent array of services for less than $10 a month. However, extras offered TV studios, program -production equip- rnent and the services of technicians. �' Washingtonhese Than is in addition to the normal outlays esthe costs Of maintaining del. re. quirement to provide it public -access icule equipment. Iligh winds or a Ihun- derslorm often can knock chepngLbl:_lyplayingTublic-notic . it cable sys- tem off it air. Faced with these pressures From cn- ble operators, some local officials are Despite these problems, there is na Despite of comp;mies bidding beginning to fight back. In Fort Worth, the City Council passed legislation for- for fr n - hises. Leading the field in Ill, first bidding contacts between council membersand franchise bidders.ars; uarter of this year were: Telepromp- or, with net income of 5.7 million dol, Officials in Iowa City passed a still ar Storer Broadcasting, 3.6 million; iacom, [plc. A_ state law in Iowa also r",, res 3 million, and UA -Columbia C• bl ' aml,grng came can Iso expensive—aa much as $14,000 a mile for overhead wires. Below, a worker Installs a ground station to Dull In aar.lat..i._.,_ / fMJ�1W�.,Y1 �LL by some of the companies call push the monthly charge much higher. One 47. channel deluxe package, which costs $28 monthly and $55 for installation, brings in all tine Dallas and Fort Worth stations, Fill -radio stations, religious stations, Spanish-language broadcast- ing, Monis Ilox Office, an all -movie channel and the Atlanta and Chicago ..superstations," which beam their pro. grans via satellite. Some concerns also try to sweeten their packages by offering free use of 48 peting cable farms be proved by 50 percent those voting in a spec election. City counc then make the fin choice. Some communities, to are doing a little ar twisting of their ow During the bidding pr cess in San Antonio, Te the City Council asked c ble companies for an a vance on future franchis fees and got a needed million dollars for stree and sewer repair from United Artists-Columbi Cablevision, the franchise r Iowa City's CouncI members successfulI sought money from cab) operators to help build lo. cal studios for public -ac. c lrograminu. And Is el insisted that the ca- ble firm install a lint: to control traffic lights and help city engineers moni- tor busy intersections. The tough competition among cable operators has brought the industry from its infancy in 19,52, when 70 systems served 70,000 customers, to the. current market of more than 15.5 million soh• scribers served by 4,225 operators. Yet to be wired are most of the na. tion's big cities, including Los Angeles, Washington, D.C., Baltimore, Boston, Chicago and Atlanta. The staggering costs are a major roadblock. The price tag for laying an underground cable can range from $25,000 to $50,000 a mile. Stringing ca- ble ors telephone or posvcr poles costs about $14,000 o mile, and construction of a single ground station to receive sat- ellite signals Is about $48,000. It would cost an estimated 70 million dollars to MICRO( ILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES WINES evsstart and TcleComnumications, m- Inc., 1.2 million each. These firms, aP. along with Cox Broadcasting. Time, the of Times Mirror Company. Sammons and tel Wanror-Amex, account for 40 percent its of the market. al Consumers served by these and oth. er companies enjuy a wide range of u, viewing choices. Cable systems, which m. can bring up to 64 channels, typically n. offer uncut movies, 24-hour sports o- channels, gavel -to -gavel coverage of Tex Congress, religious channels and chit. a• dren s programing. Some even offer d- home security and medical -alert ser. e vices that link homes with police unit 1 emergency teams. t In addition, local officials can look m forward to using public -access channels a to televise city -council meetings and deliver free TV messages. Younger watchers. It is an appeal. Ing market for advertisers as well. Sur. y veys show that cable -TV households e are larger and younger than those vithout cable. In addition, there is more TV watching in cable homes. Industry analysis predict that 35 Per. cent of the nation's homes will be equipped with Cubic television by 1985. That spurt, they say, will make it even tougher for the three major com. mercial networks to hold on to nllver. tisers. This year, cable advertising rec- Critics are expected to total 12 oilliun dollars. By 1989, says Paul Kagan of Kagan Associates, it Carmel. Cnlir, in- vestment firm, revenues will climb to 150 million dollars. Behind cable's surging populuity is file growing number of cununnnlca• lions satellites and the .sluady -Iimiu:,. tion of cable regulations by the Fed(nal Communications Cornmission.'I'he hal. est FCC actions removed natrictiom on the number of distant TV stations a cable operator could offer subscribers and allowed operators to «:hay more syndicated programs, such as the Phil Donahue Show, Mery Griffin, the Moppets and other favorites. 1 Such developments, say observers, are .sure to stimulate more pnbltc dc.• mond for cable television and sharpen the competition for now franr•hi.ecs. ❑ 11 10MAnn A, TA17.011 U.S lIEWS 6 WOALD NEFORT. Oct 0. 10110 r •F T^S di'M Y •f Ir�'r .w. a .J'f.r 7 � 1f �4� r ( 'f�".�..Lk •w p rpm• '•' .�;. yip'* IY'� ��7•¢a.l„ +Yld�a'_A'� i ��',�y , 443' IL b ,.�i�•.y'Y-. x f L •' `� .. y �: �.1,�• Lviy ��.e • P ��3�� Fr ( t/al ey .raw N � 1 �� Li � . '1 r, fP' Mtn .. P 1. v �� n• d . IS �ev 1 ��rrrf5 `r e rWn N'h lKLi4+ h v' -+ •� � IY.'h 1 tL.}ys. M1I w ..ti.of ` � r ` l� kpi /4� i � it•�01 a N t �•' t 9 'f 1 ft�I 3't�lfp', �h`V. �rw� ': '�"Y,14�.ie �,�•'* �.�'_. f H'�' LC,{ .ff• � .. ,i 11.1. /.. Ir ..,. !SF d i rr,�;"J��1CIf+a%IFr�.jcs,V<, `sCR 4i Fn i' 1+• flc 'irij#-51,.J`IS-1` ..1 a t, rt5t a��L �+f�yr•41"'i'i,d .r„y.Ms„yr�� t 1 V�'i{ "I I�,�K ,,i��`;�r� +�.d II � t. • 'sky' yi \� 14 .li��•.. i J�6. y:Gn. �4,[ %!;h \�i�lif\ley: 4ib'el.Sound.OlYun'rvie.'Aj.rW.r. 0 Wo �jh,/4jr1iju 47 4�1 W plot rt 11�--1 04 14 , ZA IVA, - ev. : INN Many millions have reasons to rethink where to stake their tomorrows. 1, i Ilium. And on page R0, we consider ways for I'opulatiun Studies ;it Harvard Uni- Many millions have reasons to rethink where to stake their tomorrows. i Ilium. And on page R0, we consider ways for I'opulatiun Studies ;it Harvard Uni- the havesand have -nota. Montana, forin. Ilan ilrveslors anywberc can profit IFnm i the small -city hawm. versily. "lit small cities, you can create stance, wants to charge its owbof--slate The report comes at a time when these more of a balance of job, family and individual." coal customers a 30% "severance tax." places seem In be on the threshold of to Many millions of Americans have rea- Proponents of the tax say it's only fair compensation for the environmental population explosion not unlike the one sons to rethink where to slake their to- damage that strip mining causes. Other that hit the suburbs in the '50s. The be- morrows. Even if they don't join the energy states have orare considering sim- ginningc or the hoom were evidenced in demographic parade, they will be affect- ilar levies. the past decade, when cities with pop- ed by it. One has only to listen to the out- In the'70s, employment opportunities d ulalinns under 250,000 grew twice as fast cries of prominent mayors over the 1980 in all fields, but especially banking, in- ingn- as all others, and the phenomenon is part of a larger demographic shift. In a dra- census tallies, which show sharp popu- lation declines in many of the large cit- surance and real estate, rose faster in rural areas and small cities than in magic reversal afhisloricnl migration pat- ics of the Northeast and Midwest, to the very big population centers. One reason p Inns, more Americans moved out of know that the exodus signals hard times for this rapid growth has been the ex - major metropolitan areas—central cities ahead for many once grand metropolises. pansion of commuter airline service and plus suburbs—than into Them during '70%. While The suburbs continue to grow, they the increasing number of airports able the Many of these people went to are losing some of lhcirallure as they bc- to handle jet traffic. Small cities are not the countryside, taking part in the well- conic more like cities, and mounting oil as isolated as they once were. Daven- documented revival of small-town and prices threaten to make commuting un- port, Iowa is many miles away from Chi - rural life. Others, less noticed, moved to economical in the decade ahead. Norwill cago smog but only 42 minutes away by small cities. The message or all these mi- life in small cities be unmitigated bliss; air for anyone who has to attend it hoard grants was clear: Ins is more. some are already feeling the pain of too meeting. hat was not always the case; rapid growth. The destinies of small cities are close- Sometimes the jobs have followed the drift of the population, and sometimes k Ins once meant less. Big cit- ly tied to the fates and fortunes of the re- they have preceded and to some extent ies have always been where Tcy—ihc gions they are in. In the '70s, about 4 provoked it. Hewlett-Packard, for exam - you go for big jobs, big man- million people migrated from the north- ple, the electronics manufacturer with 9 big time, as they eastern and north central states to the headquarters in Palo Alto, Calif, has (i used to say. And in New York or Chica- southern and western stales, regions that opened new plants during the past two go,whoyounrcisstill determined, rorthe now account for more than half of the years in six communities with popula- mostpart. by whin you do fora living. flat country's population—and most of its tions under 250,000: Colorado Springs those moving lusmall cities have a diger- rapidly rising small cities. That move- and Greeley in Colorado, Spokane, Lake f enl outlook on life. They are inlerested in mens is expected to continue through the Stevens and Vancouver in Washington pursuing career goals, of course, but less intensely so than in returning to the val- '80s, though people will favor Rocky Mountain highs to Sunbelt tans. Energy. and Raleigh, N.C. For each new plant, the company brings in a handful ues of a Norman Rockwell America: a related industries in the mountain states of cm- ployees from operations in other pans I smaller, safer, saner environment. will be a major source or new jobs, and of the country and hires about 200 more Unlike their counterparts who moved energy -producing slates will receive bil- locally. As the cities grow and the plants j to rural distracts, the small -city settlers lions or dollars In federal money under prosper, more workers are hired. have acquired surely and sanity without the synthetic -fuels program plus addi- giving up all the conveniences and cos- tional billions in tax benefits from de- he jab trends or the past dec- mopolimn pleasures of urban life. l:ry Foley, former director of the Ccmur for controlled oil prices. Nineortheiostates ade are also predicted to con - the Study of Middle -Size Cities in expected to grow the fastest are involved tinue Into the 1980s. "Seven - Springfield, III., says that the optimal -size to some extent in energy production: Ar- izona, Colorado, Alaska, Nevada, Utah, ty-five percent of all addi-i lional jobs created will be in 1 city has a population of 100,000. There Idaho, New Mexico, Texas and Wyo- the South and West, and the high point you can find some of the amenities and ming. (The other is Florida.) of concentration will he in the small cit - variety offered by metropolitan areas but Public officials and utilities executives ics," says George Sternlieb, director of without many big -city problems. The in energy -poor states worry about how the Center for Urban Policy at Ringers 1 price of this revised American the energy -rich states will use their new- University. Many of these jobs will be , I dream is no longer as high as it once found wealth and power. Some think that the highly skilled, highly paid and highly was. While the big money may yet be in without federal intervention, the energy- portable ones assmliDied with advanced - the Dig Apple, there's good money to be I producing areas may band together In a technology fields. made in the booming mini -metropolises. kind of OPEC and adopt a drop -dead at- "You Often the presence of one company i can now more readily combine titude toward the rest of the country, prompts others to follow. Thus, few of economic with social goals," says George where most of biggest cities are located. these prosperous small cities are compo- Masnick, a sociologist with the Center Already tensions are growing between ny towns. Growing communities in the MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES South and West have learned their les- tinghouse's Pennsylvania headquarters to meal has been pell-mell. Rine, Colo. is suns from the older, larger northeast- the company's steam turbine -generator expected to surge because it is in the heart ern and midwestern metropolises that division in Orlando, Fla. typically receive of the oil shale country. If and when it hitched their economic wagons to one in- S25,000 worth of such benefits. doubles in size, warns Colorado gover- dustry such as steel, rubber or autos. The chief financial attraction of the nor Richard D. Lamm, juvenile delin- Small cities wisely aim for a diversified small city is its low cost of living. qucncy may well increase three limes, economy, composed of the kinds ofcom- Runzbeimer & Co., a corporate consult- alcoholism will increase four limes and parties that make gond neighbors. Says ing firm in Rochester. Wis.. recently com- displaced homemakers—women, usual - 11.1. Recd; director of community devel- pared prices in cities under 200,000 with ly, who arc thrust on thejob market by di- opment for the National League of Cil- those in large cities within the same re- vorce or other human misfortunes—will ics: "They want fight, clean, white-collar gion. In the Southeast, the living costs increase 4h times. indu+tries. They won't hustle for an auto in small urban centers were 3% lower If sonic small cities are hurling, many plant, but they'll look for a medical sup. than those of their larger counterparts; big cities are hemorrhaging. The people ply company." The employment pros- in California they were 18% lower. The who leave these megalopolises lend to peels in these expanding urban areas are biggest savings were in housing, trans- be younger, better educated and more by no means limited to factory jobs. portation and taxes. skilled than those left behind. Revenue While manufacturers tend to set upshop sharing, grants and political representa- first, they are quickly joined by serviceof all small cities are success lion shift with the population. The urban industries. stories, ofcourse;forreasons areas with the greatest distress are con - The places most likely to attract busi- varying from poor planning sequently left with less manpower and ncsses offer a relatively willing labor to pollution, some faller. Al- money to solve their problems. force. Unions have little strength in the tonna, Pa. since the 1950s What then is the destiny of these cit - small cities of the South and West. In has absorbed u series of losses from cut- ies? Most urbanelogists think the largest those regions, many people, just one backs in its railroad, steel, shoe, garment ones will retain their rales as the center generation on, the Farm, arc imbued with and unto-rclmcd industries. Duluth, of finance, mmmgemem,'corporafe law a strong work ethic. Low lazes are an- Minn., in the scenic "land of 10,000 and specialized medicine. High-powered other lura Union C'arhide moved its lakes," has an ugly and expensive prob- jobs in such fields will continue to al- hcadquariev. from New York City to gem: air and water pollution from min- tract talented turd often childless profes- Umtbury,Conn., where executive% found ing. Even cities in prospering regions sionals to the city. Already, places like the absence of it personal income rax sometimes stumble. The growth of Gal- Chicago, New York and Washington. purticuktrly attractive. Similarly, the veston, Texas, only 50 miles from oil- D.C. are benefiting front the so -culled city of Nashua in New Hampshire, a rich Houston, has been stunted by a "gentrification" movement in which up- state with no personal income, capital- recent law limiting the city council's lax- per -middle-class urbanites are reclaiming gains or even sales too, steadily steals ing powers at a time when added rev- and restoring run-down inner-city neigh - companies from towns in nearby Mus- enues are needed to pay for new streets borhoods. But the polarization between sash mils, a state that hits earned the and sewers, these people and the poor will become nicknameTaxachusefls. Thriving small cities have problems even more pronounced. Salaries in small cities tend to be the too. The influx or population strains pub - same or slightly lower than those in big lic servicef, and people who arrive from Ithough they may grow up urban centers, but job security can be bigger places oven bring with them ex-tohnvcsomcoflhesuniedif- greater. Newer, more efficient factories pensive notions about the kinds of ser- ficuhics of their larger cous- ando(fcesin growth areasarenot sovul- vices a community should provide. In ins, small cities face a ncrable toshutdownsand layoffs as those schools, for example, the newcomers generally rosy future. That's in declining cities. Nonetheless, many "want everything from marching bands because they are likely to stay relatively managerial and professional employees tospecial-educationclasses,"says Leo A. small. There are lots of them to divide are reluctant to leave the big city, where Molinaro, president of American City up Ihe'refugees from the big urban cen- more potential employers mean greater Corp., an urban affairs consulting firm. ters. In the next 10 years many of those job mobility. So corporations often offer A city in such a predicament may raise in the forefront of this demographic enticing benefit packages to employees its real estate taxes or annex land to ex. movement will reuch their forties, a time whom they wish to relocate. Firms are pand its tax base. Either way, those who when people are usually less inclined to lending employees the money, for down carte to avoid high taxes arc suddenly push on. Even so, most members of the payments on houses and picking up the hit with them again. baby -boom generation ure still in their difference between the interest payments The irony of small cities, as with the twenties and haven't yet decided where on old mortgages and those on new. suburbs, is that some of the problems its they want to spend the rest of their work - Some are even paying for driving lessons new citizens had fled then follow them, ing and playing life, The lure of the small for transplanted New York City strop- This situation will be especially acute in cities is strong enough that the march hungers. Engineers who move from Wes- the energy -boom towns where develop- should go on fur some time to come. (51 MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS - DES MOINES r;r.1fArn 1740 59 i cializuC such its Hospital bhtrl Group. Cocoa ' ove. Fla. (Ante Stock Exchange, S 14); ' t & N Rage Investors of file Pacific. Calif. (New York Soak Exchange, 518.50): San Francisco Real Estate In- vcstors (ASG, $29,50); Washington Rett Estate Investment Trust. Bethesda. Md. (ASE, $37.50). Michael Oliver of Alex. Brown & Sans, a Baltimore brokerage house, prefers Florida Gulf Rculry Tit New York City (OTC. $17.50). trust has investments in 13 ' a .shopping centers. Oliver al ecommends Mank- America Ile: nvcslor%. Sam Francisco (NYSIi, $22.25) and Welk Fargo Morl- SLdlIU LUQ uflcvuy avian local pros rity. gage gage & Equity Trust, Sun Francisco sales rican (NYSE, $21.25); both specialize in real same ton- estate in the West, where small -city thec nd, growth is particularly intense. in I Brains, beauty - and jobs Some seekers after the good life believe they have found its quintessence in the university town. While many such places arc backwaters with books, the best offer the cultural opportunities usu- ally limited to large cities. More and more also boast plentiful jobs, frequent- ly in high-technology companies attract. cd by the science talent found on cam- pus. The fact that people who live in college towns are particularly educa. tion -conscious often means that the pri- mary and secondary schools have high standards. Tn round out the idyll, uni- versily towns tend to bo pretty, quiet and exuberantly youthful in outlook. Here arc Ove notably fetching college communities, selected on the basis of in- tervicws with university administrators, employment counselors and relocation specialists around the country: ► Burlington, Vt. (pop. 38,800). Now that the old knitting mills have Bed to Ihr Suflheli, a flew kind ufcmpluycr has moved into dozens of Ncw England col- lege towns noted for both brains and beauty. It's the high-technology outfit, and Burlington has its share—General Electric, Digital Equipment and Si- monds Precision among them. The Uni- versity of Vermont, which offers such attractions as its well-regarded engi- neering school, is part of the draw. So Is some of the prettiest hinterland in the 82 MONEY Certain corp us stand ,indirect- ly from load pr Money can- vassed st okers in sc high - gr regions and found a fcw m u. groups especially promising: Housing and construction supplies. While the home-building industry as a whole has been in o deep slump, its big- gest member—U.S. Home Corp. of Houston—has been enjoying buoyant country: Lake Champlain at the city's doorstep and the sports -rich Green Mountains a short drive away. Adds a confirmed Burlingtonian: "Where else can you sce the Moscow Philharmonic one night and UVM hockey the next?" ► Melbourne, Fla. (pop. 51,800), With the allure of a national wildlife refuge to the north, 32 miles of Atlantic beach- es to the cast, and the Florida Institut of Technology Iwo miles from dow - town, Melbourne has lately attract d some leading electronics corporatio s. TRW Vidar, Rockwcll-Callins and ic- laphonc have new plants in the area nd Harris Corp., o major producer of gh- technology communications sys ms, just moved its headquarters from C eve - land to a $5 million building in cl- bourne, Harris alone expects to c ate 5,000 new jobs there by 1985. FI ida Institute of Technology, a private! ti- tulionwithanenrollmentof3,000,fa s same healthy and varied compe0tio for its frequent student stage produc- tions: the city's new arts center, a symphony orchestra and two chamber music societies, ► Lpfaye»e/Wast Lafayette, Ind. (pop. 90,000). Purdue's student body - 31,554 people not incidded among the twin cities' formal population—would make most college communities its economic slave, but not Lafayette. An unusually diverse job market is provid- ed by such national names as Eli Lilly, State Farm Insurance, General Foods, Anheuser-Busch, A.E. Staley and Al- MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES h101MES —up 30.6'% in June atom tar the month a year; a reason for nntpanyk erity: it builds hones 20 s, most of them up -and - mg ones like Tempe. Arii.:md Col- orado Springs. Colo. U.S. [ionic sunk sells on the Big Board for 525.50—that's up Si0.50 since the end of last year— and pays a 64e dividend. Sim Trotter, research director of cher Pierce Rcfcno Inc, in Hous- ton, Iht Justin Industries of Furl Worth will ri ' ll on the building boom in small cities as • n;uinn's Imp brick maker. Justin has been c. cling its sales o0ices in ct liitia t coa. Somehow confounding the forces of imlalion, Lafayette has a high over- age household income -21st in the U.S. and. second in the stale—yet housing costs are relatively low. A used one - family house costs an average 546,500, two-bedroom condos typically start at 'rents for as little ds 5250. ► Iowa City, Iowa (pop. 49,500). IN one of the nation's lowest unemploy- ment rates (3.890), this community has largely to thank the immense, 1,878 -acre presence of the University of lowti s main campus. Many service businesses thrive because of the school and Its bus- tling facilities, such as the health-care complex, the largest university -owned medical teaching center in the U.S. A fine public bus system helps knit the city together and carries residents to the campus, where they can sec Broadway shows, attend many classes and lectures open to the public, and wonder through the art museum. Southwest Missouri Sinte, with I3,500 students, emphasizes the kind orsciencc and technology subjects—and enjoys the kind of rural setting—that many em- ployers like to be near. Hard by the rug- ged Ozarks, open prairies and unspoiled woodlands, Springfield is a dream town for outdoorsmen. And what they spend on their sports gear they can save— partly, at least—on basics, since Spring- field's cost of living runs 13.6% below the U.S. average, n i �City of Iowa CItL I MEMORANDUM DATE: October 17, 1980 TO: Chairperso s, Boards and Commissions FROM: Neal . Berlin RE: Annual Meeting of Boards and Commissions with City Council The annual meeting of the City Council members and the chairpersons of all boards and commissions is planned for October 28, 1980, at 3:00 P.M. at the Highlander Inn. The boards and commissions chairpersons should be prepared to give a short presentation on the accomplishments of their board/commission and the goals and objectives for ,the next fiscal year. A dinner is planned ,for 6:30 P.M. Please contact Lorraine Saeger (354-1800, extension 200) concerning your attendance at this meeting no later than October 23, 1980. cc: City Council MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES it I �t CITY OF CIVIC CENTER 410 E. WASHINGTON ST October 15, 1980 IOWA CITY IOWA CITY IOWA 52240 (319) 354.180.10 Larry E. Crane Executive Director Iowa Department of Environmental Quality 900 E. Grand Ave. Des Moines, Iowa 50319 Dear Larry: Enclosed please find a copy of my comments to the Commission made on October 7, 1980 at your public hearing regarding the E.P.A. Construction Grants Program. In addition to these comments, I wish to address one additional issue which is of vital concern to the City of Iowa City. Reference is made to the possible alternate wording for Option 3d authored by the representative of the City of Des Moines. Iowa City's projects (Step 2) were on the FY80 fundable list and other portions of the project were certified for grant funds in FY80. We are concerned, however, that Item 3, establishing August 27, 1980, as the latest date for submission of grant applications, is not consistent with Items 1 and 2. We therefore respectfully request that this date be changed to FY1980 or to September 30, 1980. All three conditions will then be consistent. I also wish to point out that we submitted our Facility Plan in stages so as to facilitate funding and implement construction of the Corridor Sewers and Water Pollution Control Plant. We did not know of a particular urgency to apply for Step 2 funds for the Southeast' Interceptor System since that system will not be used until the plant is at least partially constructed. However, we did file the application for Step 2 funding for the project (and two others) on September 25, 1980, prior to the end of FY80. I would like to again thank you for the opportunity to comment at the public hearing. Thank you. Sincerely yours, John R. Balmer, Mayor City of Iowa City bc3/5 cc: City Council City Engineer MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LA9 CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES MOO I `a CITY OF CIVIC CENTER 410 E. WASHINGTON ST October 15, 1980 IOWA CITY IOWA CITY IOWA 52240 (319) 354.180.10 Larry E. Crane Executive Director Iowa Department of Environmental Quality 900 E. Grand Ave. Des Moines, Iowa 50319 Dear Larry: Enclosed please find a copy of my comments to the Commission made on October 7, 1980 at your public hearing regarding the E.P.A. Construction Grants Program. In addition to these comments, I wish to address one additional issue which is of vital concern to the City of Iowa City. Reference is made to the possible alternate wording for Option 3d authored by the representative of the City of Des Moines. Iowa City's projects (Step 2) were on the FY80 fundable list and other portions of the project were certified for grant funds in FY80. We are concerned, however, that Item 3, establishing August 27, 1980, as the latest date for submission of grant applications, is not consistent with Items 1 and 2. We therefore respectfully request that this date be changed to FY1980 or to September 30, 1980. All three conditions will then be consistent. I also wish to point out that we submitted our Facility Plan in stages so as to facilitate funding and implement construction of the Corridor Sewers and Water Pollution Control Plant. We did not know of a particular urgency to apply for Step 2 funds for the Southeast' Interceptor System since that system will not be used until the plant is at least partially constructed. However, we did file the application for Step 2 funding for the project (and two others) on September 25, 1980, prior to the end of FY80. I would like to again thank you for the opportunity to comment at the public hearing. Thank you. Sincerely yours, John R. Balmer, Mayor City of Iowa City bc3/5 cc: City Council City Engineer MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LA9 CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES MOO COMMENTS FOR PUBLIC HEARING IOWA WATER QUALITY COMMISSION OCTOBER 7 1980 BY HON. JOHN R. BALMER, MAYOR CITY OF IOWA CITY, IOWA John Balmer, Mayor of notice seek ng comments on a amending 'mChapter�n400-1in 9eSoofnstheo Iowa Administrative Code relative to the type of sewers to be funded under the EPA construction grants program. As we at Iowa City understand the issue, three options are being considered. These, simplified, are: (1) fund y interceptor sewers as you have been and as Iowa City has depended upon, (2) fund interceptor sewers only if they are in lieu of treatment works, and (3) fund interceptor sewers if they terminate at the treatment works. I'm not going to take a lot of time to tell you about all the money Iowa City has spent in the past 15 years on water pollution control project;,. But I can say that we've done our best to protect the public health in Iowa City and the quality of the Iowa River. We've tried to do our planning on a regional basis. We serve the University of Iowa and the City of University Heights. We used to serve Coralville but that city chose to build its own facility. Most all the sewerage planning we've done in the past 10 years has been directed toward the completion and implementation of a Facility Plan with a new plant located a considerable distance downstream. We've hoped to have all our construction finished by 1985. We've kept our planning on a timely basis and we haven't caused any delays. Ten years ago we built a major storm water separation project whereby we got a lot of inflow out of the sanitary sewer system. Perhaps we were one of the first cities in Iowa to do that. Now we're building a major River Corridor Sewer system. That will eliminate surcharging and backup on both sides of the Iowa River and serve a major part of the University campus. We've been able to fund what we've done so far. We've kept our old plant patched up as best we can and we have bypassed very little. We've told our citizens to be patient with us and not complain about overflowing manholes, flooded basements and portable pumps because we're getting new interceptor sewers. We've got a plant site picked and are designing a new plant. Some say the site is too close to the city but we're going to live with it. Our planning has included provision for funding the anticipated local share of the $57 million immediate program outlined in our Facility Plan. Basedon funding expected under Option 1, such funding would require that existing rates be quadrupled, inflation notwithstanding. That rate boost is going to affect the citizens of Iowa City and University Heights and the taxpayers in Iowa which support the University. We can tell you that quadrupling rates is not being met with public enthusiasm at Iowa City. We now ,have a Step 2 grant application on file here at IDEQ. It includes reference to four specific projects of our Facility Plan and, when built, these will complete our plan, at least the initial construction. One of these is rehabilitation and we assume there's no problem in eligibility of that part. Another is what we call the Outfall Relief System. We built those sewers in about 1900 and they're worn out and need replacement and grouting and we're going to pay for those ourselves. The University MICROFILMED BY JURM MICR+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES N a 2 I Heights system is a new interceptor to serve our neighbor, University Heights. That's a sewer to serve another jurisdiction and we think it ought to be funded. Serving another jurisdiction should be included as a criterion for eligibility. The final project, the Southeast Interceptor System, is one we really want and need. It's a 54 or 60 -inch pipe where it enters the plant. It's going to eliminate a lot of basement backup and, of great importance to us, do away with four lift stations that have been problems for us. We'd like to have this entire system funded. We realize the tightness of money and the fact that there isn't enough of it to permit everyone to have an ideal situation. We find this out each year at budget time. There is probably some moral justification for the spreading of federal funds out across the state. But there is also the problem of needed projects whether they be treatment plants or sewers. We believe in Iowa City that the deletion of interceptor sewers from government funding will work to the detriment of the entire State of Iowa. We believe that Option 2 will result in undue harship on the City of Iowa City. We recommend adoption of Option 1. If you must adopt Option 3, we will try to live with it. Thank you. These comments will be transmitted, in writing, to the Executive Director of IDEQ on or before October 17, 1980. END MICROFILMED BY JORM MIC R+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES I IfP9� s M 1, t "Al CITY OF IOWA CITY CIVIC: C;FNIER 410 E. WASHINGTON ST. IOWA CIIY IOWA 52.240 (319) 354.18030 October 14, 1980 Mr. Milton E. Rosenbaum 526 West Park Road Iowa City, Iowa 52240 Dear Mr. Rosenbaum: Thank you for your letter of October 9 regarding your request for traffic signals at Gilbert Street and Iowa Avenue. Members of the City Council did respond favorably to your request at the meeting of September 16; however, the matter was not brought to a vote. It was determined that this project would be considered during the Capital Improvement Projects portion of the FY 82 budget. The City Council will be considering the Capital Improvement Projects during the latter part of October or early November. Sincerely urs, Neal G.'.Berlin City Manager is cc: City Council MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES a �r r CITY OF IOWA CITY CIVIC: C;FNIER 410 E. WASHINGTON ST. IOWA CIIY IOWA 52.240 (319) 354.18030 October 14, 1980 Mr. Milton E. Rosenbaum 526 West Park Road Iowa City, Iowa 52240 Dear Mr. Rosenbaum: Thank you for your letter of October 9 regarding your request for traffic signals at Gilbert Street and Iowa Avenue. Members of the City Council did respond favorably to your request at the meeting of September 16; however, the matter was not brought to a vote. It was determined that this project would be considered during the Capital Improvement Projects portion of the FY 82 budget. The City Council will be considering the Capital Improvement Projects during the latter part of October or early November. Sincerely urs, Neal G.'.Berlin City Manager is cc: City Council MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES a RECEIVED OCT 10 1980 clJOw� Y �o-w-n- 'V CrV\ LA,� MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR#LA6 CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES i n City of Iowa Ci� MEMORANDUM Date: October 17, 1980 To: City Council From: Doug Boothroy Re: Large Scale Re ial Development Plan of Ralston Creek Village The Resolution approving the preliminary and final LSRD plan for Ralston Creek Village was passed by Council at their regular meeting held May 13, 1980. A building permit has not been issued for the subject development. The LSRD provisions do not require compliance with the approved plan within any set period of time. The applicants sought and were granted pursuant to Section 8.10.02.12D.3 a special use permit to permit the required parking to be located less than 32.8 feet from the Ralston Creek bank in the floodway overlay zone. This permit was granted with the conditions that signs be posted in the parking areas and provisions made in each lease for apartments or parking spaces to give foreknowledge to occupants of parking spaces, to the effect that risk of flood damage to property exists. Further, the applicant shall provide a warning system to notify apartment occupants of potential risk occasioned by heavy downpours within the watershed. The design of such a system shall follow in principle the descriptions given the Board in the public hearing by the representatives of the applicant. Approximately 40% of the required parking spaces are affected by this requirement. No order or decision of the Board permitting a use of a premises is valid for a period longer than six months, unless such use is established within said period. The Board granted the special use permit for the required parking for the subject development March 15, 1979. Therefore, because the six month period has elapsed, without establishment of the use pursuant to the order of the Board, it will be necessary for the applicant to reapply fora special use permit. The applicant is allowed to complete that portion of the LSRD plan that is not affected by the Board's decision. bc4/4 IfN MICROFILMED BY 7 JORM MICR+LA6 >i CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES City of Iowa CV. MEMORANDUM Date: October 16, 1980 To: City Council n 1 From: Rosemary Vitosh, Director of Finance I� Re: Natural Gas. Compression Equipment On Monday, September 8, 1980, Dave Daley, Equipment Superintendent, and I discussed with you the purchase of natural gas compression equipment to be located at the Equipment Division and utilized mainly by the Police patrol vehicles and additional high mileage City vehicles. Bids were received on October 6, 1980, by the Purchasing Division for the natural gas compression equipment. Five (5) request for bids were mailed with two (2) firms submitting bids. Gas Service Energy Corporation, Kansas City, Missouri $50,050 and Dual Fuels, Incorporated,, Greeley, Colorado $72,832.34. The Equipment Superintendent and Purchasing Agent have reviewed the bids and recommend an award to Gas Service Energy Corporation, on the basis of low bid and the onboard systems are virtually identical. An order will be placed with Gas Service Energy Corporation and delivery is expected of the equipment approximately November 30, 1980. bj4/8 MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES /917 i li i I y i I City of Iowa CV. MEMORANDUM Date: October 16, 1980 To: City Council n 1 From: Rosemary Vitosh, Director of Finance I� Re: Natural Gas. Compression Equipment On Monday, September 8, 1980, Dave Daley, Equipment Superintendent, and I discussed with you the purchase of natural gas compression equipment to be located at the Equipment Division and utilized mainly by the Police patrol vehicles and additional high mileage City vehicles. Bids were received on October 6, 1980, by the Purchasing Division for the natural gas compression equipment. Five (5) request for bids were mailed with two (2) firms submitting bids. Gas Service Energy Corporation, Kansas City, Missouri $50,050 and Dual Fuels, Incorporated,, Greeley, Colorado $72,832.34. The Equipment Superintendent and Purchasing Agent have reviewed the bids and recommend an award to Gas Service Energy Corporation, on the basis of low bid and the onboard systems are virtually identical. An order will be placed with Gas Service Energy Corporation and delivery is expected of the equipment approximately November 30, 1980. bj4/8 MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES /917 i li i I I. parks & recreation department AAE Mo to• City Manager and City Council from . Dennis Showalter re. Elm Grove Park dat e October 16, 1980 Elm Grove Park has one old concrete tennis court which was reconditioned and made playable in 1977 at a cost of $2,600. The court should remain usable for another 4 to 5 years with a minimum of expense. There are also 2 basketball goals on the courts. The court was in use approximately 70% of the time this season. I have taken some sheets from the appraisal, which are attached. One of these sheets shows how the park could be divided. The staff prefers to sell only the east (ball diamond) portion of the park at the present time. The park is currently zoned M -1 -Light Industrial. Under the proposed new zoning ordinance, the Park would be zoned C 1-1, Intensive Commercial Zone. This zoning is intended to provide areas for those sales and service functions and businesses whose operations are typically characterized by outdoor display, storage and/or sales of merchandiseby repair of motor vehicles, by outdoor amusement and recreational activities, or by activities or operations conducted in buildings or structures not completedly enclosed. Doug Boothroy will be present at the informal meeting to provide additional Information on zoning. i . i i I I i 1, parks & recreation department AAE Mo to• City Manager and City Council from . Dennis Showalter re. Elm Grove Park dat e October 16, 1980 Elm Grove Park has one old concrete tennis court which was reconditioned and made playable in 1977 at a cost of $2,600. The court should remain usable for another 4 to 5 years with a minimum of expense. There are also 2 basketball goals on the courts. The court was in use approximately 70% of the time this season. I have taken some sheets from the appraisal, which are attached. One of these sheets shows how the park could be divided. The staff prefers to sell only the east (ball diamond) portion of the park at the present time. The park is currently zoned M -1 -Light Industrial. Under the proposed new zoning ordinance, the Park would be zoned C 1-1, Intensive Commercial Zone. This zoning is intended to provide areas for those sales and service functions and businesses whose operations are typically characterized by outdoor display, storage and/or sales of merchandiseby repair of motor vehicles, by outdoor amusement and recreational activities, or by activities or operations conducted in buildings or structures not completedly enclosed. Doug Boothroy will be present at the informal meeting to provide additional Information on zoning. r MICRorILMED BY JORM MICR+LA13 CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES 1 i . i i I i 1, I r MICRorILMED BY JORM MICR+LA13 CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES 1 SUMMARY OF SALIrNT DATA Identification Subject property consists of an approximately rectangular lot with a frontage of 320' on the south side of Benton, a frontage on Clinton Street south of Benton of 2241, and a frontage on Dubuque Street south of Benton Street of 194'. From the south end of the Clinton Street frontage, the property line extends east loot, north 30' and thence easterly 220' to the south end of the Dubuque Street frontage. The total area of the site is 85, 080 square feet. The property is zoned M-1. It is presently improved with park improvements consisting Of a small brick building, paved tennis courts, fencing and backstop for baseball, playground equipment and lights. The property in its entirety would be described as: Beginning at the Northwest corner of Outlot 1 in County Seat Addition, being the intersection of the south right-of- way line of Benton Street and the east right-of-way line of Clinton Street, thence Easterly along the south right-of-way line of Benton Street 320 feet to its intersection with the west line of Dubuque Street, thence South along the west line of Dubuque Street 194 feet, thence Westerly parallel to the south line of Benton Street 220 feet, thence South 30 feet, thence Westerly parallel of the south line of Benton Street 100 feet to the east line of Clinton Street, thence North along the east line of Clinton Street 224 feet to the point of beginning. Ownership The fee simple interest in the above described property appears to be in the City of Iowa City. I-Iistory of Property Subject property has been utilized as n city park or playground. Occupancy At the time of inspection, the property was occupied by the City with park and playground improvements. Addresses City of Iowa City, Civic Center, 410 East Washington Street, Lown City, Iowa 52240. IOWA APPRAISAL AND RESEARCH CORPORATION MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LA6 CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES 2. /9AP i 1 I i I SUMMARY OF SALIrNT DATA Identification Subject property consists of an approximately rectangular lot with a frontage of 320' on the south side of Benton, a frontage on Clinton Street south of Benton of 2241, and a frontage on Dubuque Street south of Benton Street of 194'. From the south end of the Clinton Street frontage, the property line extends east loot, north 30' and thence easterly 220' to the south end of the Dubuque Street frontage. The total area of the site is 85, 080 square feet. The property is zoned M-1. It is presently improved with park improvements consisting Of a small brick building, paved tennis courts, fencing and backstop for baseball, playground equipment and lights. The property in its entirety would be described as: Beginning at the Northwest corner of Outlot 1 in County Seat Addition, being the intersection of the south right-of- way line of Benton Street and the east right-of-way line of Clinton Street, thence Easterly along the south right-of-way line of Benton Street 320 feet to its intersection with the west line of Dubuque Street, thence South along the west line of Dubuque Street 194 feet, thence Westerly parallel to the south line of Benton Street 220 feet, thence South 30 feet, thence Westerly parallel of the south line of Benton Street 100 feet to the east line of Clinton Street, thence North along the east line of Clinton Street 224 feet to the point of beginning. Ownership The fee simple interest in the above described property appears to be in the City of Iowa City. I-Iistory of Property Subject property has been utilized as n city park or playground. Occupancy At the time of inspection, the property was occupied by the City with park and playground improvements. Addresses City of Iowa City, Civic Center, 410 East Washington Street, Lown City, Iowa 52240. IOWA APPRAISAL AND RESEARCH CORPORATION MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LA6 CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES 2. /9AP i 3 3 I Tax Data Subject parcel is not assessed. Purpose of the Appraisal The purpose of the appraisal is to estimate the market value of the fee simple interest in the above described property as though placed on the market available for private development. Definition of Market Value Market Value is defined as: "The highest price in terms of money which a property will bring in a competitive and open market under all condi- tions requisite to a fair sale; the buyer and seller acting prudently, knowledgeably and without undue stimulus". Definition of highest & Best Use "That allowable use, for which sufficient demand can be shown, which at the date of the appraisal is most likely to produce the greatest net return to the property over a given period of time". Summary of Value Total Park $213,000. Fast Portion $120,000. Inspection Subject property was inspected on July 11, 1980. The date of valuation and date of appraisal is as of July 11, 1080. Fixtures & Equipment The existing park improvements are considered to have no value for the property's highest and best use as commercial development. IOWA APPRAISAL AND RESEARCH CORPORATION MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES 3. '.I i I i i e 7 � Tax Data Subject parcel is not assessed. Purpose of the Appraisal The purpose of the appraisal is to estimate the market value of the fee simple interest in the above described property as though placed on the market available for private development. Definition of Market Value Market Value is defined as: "The highest price in terms of money which a property will bring in a competitive and open market under all condi- tions requisite to a fair sale; the buyer and seller acting prudently, knowledgeably and without undue stimulus". Definition of highest & Best Use "That allowable use, for which sufficient demand can be shown, which at the date of the appraisal is most likely to produce the greatest net return to the property over a given period of time". Summary of Value Total Park $213,000. Fast Portion $120,000. Inspection Subject property was inspected on July 11, 1980. The date of valuation and date of appraisal is as of July 11, 1080. Fixtures & Equipment The existing park improvements are considered to have no value for the property's highest and best use as commercial development. IOWA APPRAISAL AND RESEARCH CORPORATION MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES 3. NRIGIIBORI-IOOD DI?SCRIP'1'ION The neighborhood is that area lying north of Highway ii6, cast of the Iowa River and south of the Central Business District or south of Burlington Street. To the east the area would generally be by a line just west of Van Buren Street, south to Kirkwood Street and by a line to the east of Ilighland Court south of Kirkwood Street. In general, this neighborhood would con- stitute the commercially and industrially zoned area immediately south of the business district. This total neighborhood might be further divided with the southern portion being that portion south of the cast -west railroad tracks at approximately Wright Street. Main traffic arteries in the southern portion of the neighborhood in which subject property is located are Gilbert Street for north -south traffic, and the Benton -Kirkwood artery which divides as one-way traffic between Ben- ton and Kirkwood on Dubuque and Clinton Streets. IIighway #6 and Burling- ton Street are, of course, major east -west arteries and Riverside Drive to the west of the Iowa River is a major north -south artery. That portion of subject neighborhood in the immediate vicinity of subject property is all zoned M-1, however, uses consist of a mixture of industrial, service com- mercial, retail and residential. There is relatively little usable vacant land in the neighborhood and demand has increased land values in the past severnl years. Older residential prop- crties are often rehabilitated instead of demolished for conversion to com- mercial use because of the good apartment rental market. The neighborhood is currently undergoing a slow transition period. As the Central Business District of Iowa City has been developed to capacity, the north portion of the neighborhood has acted as spill over for new develop- ment. New commercial activities are somewhat restricted to the north, east and west portions of the Central Business District due to zoning, Sub- ject neighborhood's predominant zoning of M-1, with some M-2, allows for a variety of uses including residential, office, retail, service commercial and industrial. The trend for the neighborhood is for continued growth with new develop- ment more closely related to office, retail and service commercial usage. IOWA APPRAISAL AND RESEARCH MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LA9 CEDAR RAPIDS - DES MOINES CORPORATION Fadi' n i'I�•4l�(L,,, Ise', I — — 3 7' - ---- — --- -- ------ `j J — - iG>� v/ In. N I U) fJ I II ; ' I —I ---- ZZ0 ;I h7 I n... /DD ' EI r'Pet GST ll 1O 15�; ( I , v I I i IOWA APPRAISAL AND RESEARCH CORPORATION MICROFILMED BY - - DORM MICR+LAB - CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES DESCRIPTION OP' SUBJECT SITE Subject site is an irregular tract located on the south side of Benton Street between Clinton and Dubuque Streets. The site has a frontage on the south side of Benton of 3201. The frontage on Clinton Street to the west is 224, and the frontage on Dubuque Street to the cast is 1941. The Clinton Street frontage extends east to a depth of 1001. The south property line than jogs north 30' and continues east to Dubuque Street for a distance of 2201. The total area of the site is 05, 080 square feet. The site is generally level and slightly above the grade of abutting streets. Surface drainage appears to be adequate. Although the appraiser has made no soil tests, it would appear that the soil is capable of supporting those improvements which would represent the highest and best use of subject site. Abutting streets are paved, with concrete curb and gutter. There are concrete public sidewalks along the east, north and a portion of the west property lines. Traffic on Dubuque Street is one-way northbound. Traffic on Benton Street is one-way westbound. Traffic on Clinton Street is one-way south- bound. There is two-way traffic on Benton Street to the west of Clinton Street and on Kirkwood to the cast of Dubuque Street. The one-way traffic diversion around the block in which subject property is located is a part of the Benton - Kirkwood traffic artery. There are at the present time no curb cuts to subject property from abutting streets, however, it is assumed that adequate access will be available to the site. All utilities and city services are available to the site. Thu site is •roned M-1, Light Industrial, which permits those uses which would be atypical of the neighborhood and reflective of highest and best use. The appraiser assumes that there are no utility easements which would ad- versely affect the normal development of subject property. East Portion In addition to estimating the value of the entire park site, the City has also requested a valuation on the east portion only. The east portion \ is defined as: All that part of subject property lying cast of a line 138' east of the Clinton Street sidewalk and 199' west of the Dubuque Street sidewalk. (Please refer -to Plot Plan Sketch for measurements). IOWA APPRAISAL AND RESEARCH CORPORATION i MICROFILMED BY DORM MICR+LAO 3 CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES v 10 F , i r1 11. The property plats indicate the cast -west dimension of the site is 3201. The sidewalks measure 3371 apart, indicating that approximately 171 inside the sidewalks is a portion of the platted street. For purposes the appraisal, bewe will assume Lhat that distance is divided equally between Clinton Street and Dubuque Street and that the above referenced line would then 129. 51 east of the west property line and 190. 51 west of the east property line. The east part as defined would include the fences and backstop for the ball diamond. The west part would include the building, lighted tennis courts, playground equipment, trees, shrubs, flower gardens, picnic bench shelter, etc. and also apparently include the paved parking portion at the extreme south end. The total area of the east part as defined herein is considered to be 36, 957 square feet. IOWA APPRAISAL AND RESEARCH CORPORATION MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB -. CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES LYr 1 M ,'-N 1 IIIGIILST & BEST UQL OF SUBJECT SITE' 12. Subject site is zoned M-1, Light Industrial. The site is presently developed for and utilized as a neighborhood park. Based on development trends in the neighborhood, it is the opinion of the appraiser that the highest and best use of subject site would be for its development for office or commercial use. With respect to traffic patterns, the site would most advantageously be de- veloped as a single parcel so that ready access could be obtained to loth directions of traffic on the Benton -Kirkwood traffic artery. The parcel could be developed with a multiple use building. If the parcel were to he developed as two separate sites, a developer might give consideration to drive easements across the south portion of the property so as to provide all parcels with access to both directions of travel. Description of Improvements & Highest & Best Use of Subject Property as Improved Subject property is presently developed and improved as a park or play- ground. Almost all the east portion of the park is open grassed area with fences and backstop for a ball diamond. The western portion of the park contains a fenced and.surfaced tennis court with lights, playground equipment, a circular formal flower garden, a small picnic bench shel- ter, and an older brick matintenance and toilet building. As residential development in the neighborhood decreases, there is less demand for the park facilities. The appraisal assumes the sale of the park or por- tions thereof for commercial development, and the existing improve- ments are not considered reflective of that highest and best use. The appraisal is made on the assumption that the existing improvements will be removed and the property will be marketed in a condition suit- able for construction. An estimate, however, will be given for demo- lition and site preparation. I The highest and best use of subject property as presently improved is for the removal of existing improvements and the development of com- mercial facilities. i f i IOWA APPRAISAL AND RESEARCH CORPORATION MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB f CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES - j 1 ,'-N 1 IIIGIILST & BEST UQL OF SUBJECT SITE' 12. Subject site is zoned M-1, Light Industrial. The site is presently developed for and utilized as a neighborhood park. Based on development trends in the neighborhood, it is the opinion of the appraiser that the highest and best use of subject site would be for its development for office or commercial use. With respect to traffic patterns, the site would most advantageously be de- veloped as a single parcel so that ready access could be obtained to loth directions of traffic on the Benton -Kirkwood traffic artery. The parcel could be developed with a multiple use building. If the parcel were to he developed as two separate sites, a developer might give consideration to drive easements across the south portion of the property so as to provide all parcels with access to both directions of travel. Description of Improvements & Highest & Best Use of Subject Property as Improved Subject property is presently developed and improved as a park or play- ground. Almost all the east portion of the park is open grassed area with fences and backstop for a ball diamond. The western portion of the park contains a fenced and.surfaced tennis court with lights, playground equipment, a circular formal flower garden, a small picnic bench shel- ter, and an older brick matintenance and toilet building. As residential development in the neighborhood decreases, there is less demand for the park facilities. The appraisal assumes the sale of the park or por- tions thereof for commercial development, and the existing improve- ments are not considered reflective of that highest and best use. The appraisal is made on the assumption that the existing improvements will be removed and the property will be marketed in a condition suit- able for construction. An estimate, however, will be given for demo- lition and site preparation. I The highest and best use of subject property as presently improved is for the removal of existing improvements and the development of com- mercial facilities. i f i IOWA APPRAISAL AND RESEARCH CORPORATION MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB f CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES - j VEENSTRA & KIMM, INC. October 13, 1980 Neal G. Berlin City Manager City of Iowa City Civic Center 410 East Washington Street Iowa City, Iowa 52240 RIVER CORRIDOR SEWERS PROJECT WEEKLY PROGRESS SUMMARY NO. 13 This is to report progress on the River Corridor Sewers project for the week ending October 11, 1980, and to provide information regarding the contractor's plans for the weeks ahead. Crw No. 2, working south . in Madison Street from Jefferson, shed laying 42-einch pipe to Iowa Avenue. Crew No. 1 cleared the Bloomington Street intersection. The power poles mentioned last week have been relocated. Eby is again installing storm sewer in Madison between Market and Bloomington. After completing the storm sewer work in this area, Eby will install the remainder of the 8-inch.ductile iron sanitary sewer. This work should be completed this week. Eby will then prepare the subgrade for pavement. Affholder has completed 15 linear feet of the tunnel at Park Road. A second crew from Affholder is expected next week to begin tunneling under the Crandic crossing an Riverside Drive. Crew No. 1 will move to Dubuque Street north of Park Road sometime this week. Pipe laying must be completed between Park Road and Kimball Road during October. A plan for handling traffic on Dubuque Street was developed at the October 10 Progress Meeting. The west a lane of Mdison Street from Court to rlinton week.was paved last week. Tapered sections and intersections should be paBuved tghis The sodding subcontractor began laying sod on Capitol Street the latter part of the week. ..... ...... . MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS - DES MOINES � , ,I ,_ - �: -- -- i �', i; -:, , '.i j�..: _. ._ ,.� ,,> ;i _,. ..:.' �, I r ;:, .. . I o ,:,..:� `. �-, '. . .,� �-1 CITY CSF CIVIC CENTER 410 E. WASHINGTON ST. October 10, 1980 n OWA C ITY IOWA CITY IOWA 52240 (319) 354.180D Dear Members of the Downtown Association: The Iowa City Design Review Committee is pleased to invite you to a program that has been planned in conjunction with the symposium, "Buildings Reborn: New Uses, Old Places". The program will be on Thursday, October 30, at Old Brick at 5:00 p.m. Wine and cheese will be served. The featured speaker will be Mr. Michael Nichols, a Real Estate Consultant with Shlaes & Co., Chicago, Illinois. His experience with the Shlaes firm has been extensive in working with small cities' downtown renewal and redevelopment. He will direct his talk to business people and will emphasize the economic benefits of preservation and adaptive uses of buildings. There will be ample opportunity for questions. The film "Main Street", which takes a look at people who are helping to restore and revitalize downtowns in small cities, will be shown. The Shlaes firm has been the consultant for the National Trust for Historic Preservation and for the cities of Galesburg, Illinois, Madison, Indiana and Hot Springs, South Dakota. This work has been done in connection with the Trust's Main Street Project, a pilot program to integrate historic preservation and economic revitalization efforts. We hope this brief description of the program will interest you and that you will take this opportunity to listen to Mr. Nichols. Your participation, we're certain, will be not only informative and interesting, but also very helpful. If you have any questions, please contact me at 353-6271 (office) or 338-9818 (home), or call Larry Chiat at 354-1800, Ext. 335. Thank you. Sincerely,z ��% Annette Lilly, Chairman of Design Review Committee Design Review Committee: Bruce Haupert Laurence LaFore Bob Alexander Don Sinek Joyce SummerwiII Nancy Seiberling Tom Wegman Jim Wockenfuss bj2/6 MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LA9 CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES HP Police Department Monthly Report September, 1980 Citizen generated requests for police services again increased in September as compared to the prior month. A total of 2.,863 citizen requests were received in September, thus sur- passing the previous annual high of 2,715 in August, 1980. Significant increases were noted in the following crime categories. Category Assault Motor Vehicle Theft Vandalism Family 8 Children Offenses Non -Traffic Criminal Juvenile Motor Vehicle Accidents Assist & Service Alarms (silent) Gunshots Miscellaneous Investigations Lost/Found Property Parking Violations August '80 September'80 14 28 11 17 80 105 44 47 44 59 30 38 157 216 411 464 205 231 4 5 57 62 223 230 198 348 Moderate decreases were recorded in the following categories: Category Burglary Larceny/Theft Arson Rape Fraud Receiving/Buying Stolen Property Sex Offenses Controlled Substances OMVUI Liquor Law Violations Intoxication Disorderly Conduct Accident (not Motor Vehicle) Attempt to Locate Animal Calls (domestic) Traffic Violations MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES August 180 September '80 59 39 214 199 7 2 6 0 9 8 11 0 19 a 1{ 2 27 26 8 2 48 32 308 205 6 2 87 53 85 64 65 60 j j. t I. i; . �;; C Hf/ i_ Monthly Report - Police Department -2- Arrests effected or citations and tickets issued in September totaled 4,018 as compared to 2,433 in the previous month. Traffic violation,;; and citations issued increased during .jeptember from 436 in August to 659 in September. Parking tickets increaser) during the same period from 1,857 to 3,215. Prolonged investigations by the Detective Bureau yielded good results that saw the arrest of a major con artist engaged in bank fraud as well as a number of others engaged in lesser criminal acts. Officers of the Department completed a refresher course and qualification in firearms use at the Cedar Rapids Police Firearms Range during the latter part of September. Animal Control activities continued at a high level even though operating hours of the Shelter were reduced to correspond to reduced staffinglevel. Statistical reports are attached. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES — i c I i I •' ,it R. i f , } ,it R. i f , CITY OF CIVIC : C:1 NII 1? 410 1. W1SHINGION if IOWA CITY IOWA CITY IOWA .522.40 (319) 354.180D October 13, 1980 PRESS RELEASE Contact Person: Hugh Mose, Transit Manager Iowa City Transit 354-1800, Ext. 289 Iowa City Transit Manager Hugh Mose has been selected as one of 40 transit officials from across the country to attend the 1980-81 Urban Mass Transportation Management Seminar. This program is sponsored by the Urban Mass Transportation Administration in conjunction with Northeastern University, and is held annually in Boston. The Transit Manager will receive a fellowship under provisions of Section 10 of the Urban Mass Transportation Act. The $5,000 grant will cover the cost of tuition, books, living expenses and travel for the four week course. The program consists of a two week session of intensive study in transit management concepts and strategies, four months of on-the- job application of these techniques, and then two more weeks of further study. The first session will convene November 11. -0- From: Administrative Offices f MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES /99 R. i CITY OF CIVIC : C:1 NII 1? 410 1. W1SHINGION if IOWA CITY IOWA CITY IOWA .522.40 (319) 354.180D October 13, 1980 PRESS RELEASE Contact Person: Hugh Mose, Transit Manager Iowa City Transit 354-1800, Ext. 289 Iowa City Transit Manager Hugh Mose has been selected as one of 40 transit officials from across the country to attend the 1980-81 Urban Mass Transportation Management Seminar. This program is sponsored by the Urban Mass Transportation Administration in conjunction with Northeastern University, and is held annually in Boston. The Transit Manager will receive a fellowship under provisions of Section 10 of the Urban Mass Transportation Act. The $5,000 grant will cover the cost of tuition, books, living expenses and travel for the four week course. The program consists of a two week session of intensive study in transit management concepts and strategies, four months of on-the- job application of these techniques, and then two more weeks of further study. The first session will convene November 11. -0- From: Administrative Offices f MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES /99 i f , THE ehehagy saver NEWS Number 5 CITYOF IOWA CITY OCTOBER 1980 AN APPEAL FROM THE PRESIDENT Our country is at one end of a 12,000 mile supply line, and half the oil that we use is on the other end of that supply line. Energy security is a vital link also between national military security on the one hand, and economic security at home... Oil imports are the greatest single factor in the high inflation which afflicts our country. ...we will never reach our goals of energy security without a nationwide determination to use energy more efficiently...the best energy that we can describe or encompass is that which we save, which we do not waste. It's the quickest, cheapest, cleanest way to increase the reserves of energy which we actually need to consume. ...if we can launch successfully a clear, dedicated, persistent effort that will involve literally millions of Americans... we can finally achieve the purpose that we endorse. We can accomplish 25 percent reduction in energy use for transportation, for heating and cooling buildings and for industry. -mor* page p - LO -CAL HOUSES SAVE ENERGY A Northern Virginia builder, using well-known construction techniques, has succeeded in reducing home heating costs nearly 80% in newly constructed homes. Harry Hart, a former Iowan and past employee at the Smithsonian Institution, built six houses in Giles Knoll, Virginia and the results have been spectacular. In these new homes heating costs were only about one-quarter of the average for similar houses. Hart builds his houses with double insulation in double walls. The houses are passive solar because each has a large window area facing south which permits the sun to warm the house during the winter. The windows are double glazed for improved heating and cooling efficiency. The homes also have an enclosed area (vestibule) inside the front door for the same purpose. These techniques are even more attractive than other methods of solar power because they are more economical and have no maintenance costs. The house's double walls prevent cold from being conducted through lumber into the house - a problem even when ordinary walls are well -insulated. They have doubled the recommended insulation in the walls (6") and doubled the recommended amount in the ceiling (12"). There are no windows on the east and west sides of the house. -more page 2 - ENERGY AUDITS TO BEGIN The Energy Conservation Office will start another phase of the comprehensive City Energy Saving program in late October. This section of the program will consist of walk-through energy audits of all 31 heated City buildings. In the spring of this year the Recreation Center, the Cemetery Office Building, and the Southeast Fire Station were audited. Roger Tinklenberg will conduct the audits. He will be looking for areas that are not efficiently utilizing energy. Discoveries made by Roger will be collected in the form of recommendations to the departments involved. These recommendations will usually be for low or not cost solutions to the problems identified. However, major capital investment projects will be called for if there is need. -,pore pees s - Energy Conservation Program, 410 E. Waabington, IcrriClty, Iowa 52240 (319) 35 - eo MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES ENERGY SAVER news HOUSES...... The construction techniques Hart uses have been known for years but apparently no one ever put them together in an energy savings package because fuel costs lack the importance they do now. Most of Hart's ideas came from the Small Home Council at the University of Illinois which designed what it called the "Illinois Lo -Cal House". Almost all of Hart's information was found in a 1945 publication of the Council. Few of the techniques have been used since then due to a lack of incentive. However, pressure An the form of sky -rocketing fuel bills has -brought these methods out of mothballs. Perhaps now a larger share of new homes will be constructed in this manner saving home owners money and conserving valuable energy. If you would like more information on this type of h t t' 11 R NOW TO M VOLAR MVINO SY 15 MILES A WIM President Carter has asked us all to drive 15 miles less every week. And if you're like most driv- ers, you can save 15 miles—and probably a lot more—just by changing your driving habits and planning ahead. Here are five easy ways to save 15 miles: • Set aside one day a week as your "car -free" day. • Join a work pool, school pool or shopping pool. • Trim your driving by two miles a clay. . • Think before you drive. Combine trips and be sure each trip is necessary. • Ride with someone who's already on the road—the bus driver. For a free booklet with more ways to save energy and money, write "Energy," Box 02, Oak Ridge, TN 37830. Wis� Safford NVAN" It. U.S. Department of Energy Ouse cons ruc on, ca oger Ti nkl enberg at the Energy Walk or ride a bike on short trips. You'll Office. improve your physical fitness while you save money and energy. AUDITS,,,,...., Roger will focus on windows and doors that need weatherstripping, excess lighting levels in buildings, and deficient controls such as leaky valves, broken thermostats, and, continuously running fans. By identifying and correcting these items energy cost to the City can be cut. The audits, of the three buildings dones last spring revealed that energy usage could be cut by 10 to 20 percent in each building. The savings from this would be approximately $5,183 per year. The average time needed for the recommended improvements to pay for themselves in energy savings ranges from a few months to two or three years depending on the initial investment cost. The audits alone will not insure energy savings. The recolslmen- dations resulting from the audits must be implemented to realize cost savings. The money saves by improving energy efficiency in City buildings will help offset the increasing.. cost of energy. Hopefully, larger savings will be realized in later stages of the conservation program so money can be channelled to other departments and programs that are useful rather than spending for high cost energy. MICROFILMED BY JORM MIC R+L AB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES Page 2 PRESIDENT...... This morning... more than 52 million Americans drove to work alone... If just half these commuters had doubled up, the country could have saved 14.7 million gallons of gasoline this day. That's 375,000 barrels of oil. As we enter our heaviest driving season of the year, I call on all members of the private and public sectors to encourage ride sharing and transit use, promote better driver effieiency, and to inform the public through various means of education and. promotions and advertisement, of the methods and the; advantages of conservation. The most difficult single; job in the entire crucial effort in our country to save) energy and to give us a better! national security is to' convince every single American' that he or she, as just one individual, can take actioni that will be truly significant. (Excerpted from remarks of the President at a briefing in the East Room of the White House, April 29, 1980). NOTEo The Energy Conservation Office of Iowa City wel- comes any and rill infor- mation, correspondence, or suggestion concerning the ENERGY SAVER NEIVS. Please send them to the address listed on the first page. Thank -you. 9 �. City of Iowa c:_y . MEMORANDUM j DATE: October 9, 1980 TO: City Manager ' City Council FROM: Lyle G. Seydel, Housing Coordinator RE: Public Housing IA 22-3 inj.. ' 1. Attached correspondence from HUD provides tentative site approval f for the South-half of vacated Pickard Street. Action will be taken to obtain required documents for final site approval. $. 2. Council was provided a copy of the letter dated August 14 sent to HUD concerning this project. A letter will be prepared and sent ' 5 to Southgate Development requesting revision of their proposal. 3. The Housing Authority currently has a Preliminary Loan Contract in I j the amount of $9,600 approved in September, 1978. We have drawn $8,804 which has been expended for surveys and options. Request ! Council consider approving an Amendment to the Preliminary Loan I Contract in the amount of $60,000. This money will be utilized to ,. purchase the approved site on Muscatine Avenue and cover additional administrative costs that will be incurred between now and construe- j tion completion. A resolution will be prepared for adoption at the formal meeting October 21, 1980. j LGS/cf is al i _. no P I.' F MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR#LA13 4 a CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES ,., In Re01Y Relp lot (Martin 515-284-4687) 1 U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Region VII Service 011ie 210 walnut Det Moine,, lows 50309 October 2, 1980 Mr. Lyle G. Seydel Iowa City Housing Authority Civic Center 410 E. Washington Street Iowa City, IA 52240 Dear Mr. Seydel: Subject: IA 22-3 Iowa City, Iowa On May 9, 1980, we transmitted, for processing, the one proposal received for initial screening on the above turnkey project. All sections responded, and we notified you on June 16 that you could notify Southgate Development, Inc. of their tentative selection as turnkey developer. Our next step, once the developer accepted his selection, would be to initiate formal pro- cessing so that an ultimate development conference could be scheduled to discuss a tentative price. We could not, however, initiate this formal processing until an additional site included in the developer's packet had been reviewed and approved by HUD. The HUD -52651; Preliminary Site Report, and related documents were received from you on August -18, 1980.. Therefore, on August.25, a review. was requested by our Valuation andArchitecturalSections. These reviews were completed September 30 and our comments follow: TENTATIVE SITE APPROVAL Site N15 - 1200 Highland Site is the south portion of vacated Pickard Street between Highland Avenue and Friendly Avenue. Site is currently used for garden by adjoining property owners. Site is 18-2411 above -street with a• gentle slope from south to north. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES D 199f/ i la. l 41� 1 �l i' I: In Re01Y Relp lot (Martin 515-284-4687) 1 U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Region VII Service 011ie 210 walnut Det Moine,, lows 50309 October 2, 1980 Mr. Lyle G. Seydel Iowa City Housing Authority Civic Center 410 E. Washington Street Iowa City, IA 52240 Dear Mr. Seydel: Subject: IA 22-3 Iowa City, Iowa On May 9, 1980, we transmitted, for processing, the one proposal received for initial screening on the above turnkey project. All sections responded, and we notified you on June 16 that you could notify Southgate Development, Inc. of their tentative selection as turnkey developer. Our next step, once the developer accepted his selection, would be to initiate formal pro- cessing so that an ultimate development conference could be scheduled to discuss a tentative price. We could not, however, initiate this formal processing until an additional site included in the developer's packet had been reviewed and approved by HUD. The HUD -52651; Preliminary Site Report, and related documents were received from you on August -18, 1980.. Therefore, on August.25, a review. was requested by our Valuation andArchitecturalSections. These reviews were completed September 30 and our comments follow: TENTATIVE SITE APPROVAL Site N15 - 1200 Highland Site is the south portion of vacated Pickard Street between Highland Avenue and Friendly Avenue. Site is currently used for garden by adjoining property owners. Site is 18-2411 above -street with a• gentle slope from south to north. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES D 199f/ V4 ^1 The area is comprised of single family residential properties in the low to moderate price range. Pride of ownership is prevelant. The site is acceptable for family housing; however, there is a sewer line running through the site. It would appear that the houses at either side of site are served by this sewer. Accept- ability is predicated on relocating sewer line so it will not interfere with building placement. If possible, it would be pre- ferred to abandon the sewer and connect to the line in Highland Avenue. At your request, we have completed our "as is" appraisal of this site which is estimated to be $9,250. This value is contingent upon relocating the sewer. This should not be construed as granting final site approval on this site. Final site approval cannot be given until submission of title opinions, surveys acceptable to HUD, and satisfying any conditions of tentative site approval. The fair market value is the highest price estimated in terns of money which a property will bring if exposed for sale in the open market, allowing a reasonable time to find a purchaser who buys with knowledge of all the uses to which it is adapted and is capable of being used. The basis of the value conclusion is the market price of comparable properties adjusted for observable differences between each comparable and the subject property. The PHA should now request that the developer revise his proposal based on the above and those comments included in your August 14, 1980, letter to, Donna Martin. Once this revised information is received, in six copies,; we can initiate formal technical processing. Once we complete this stage of processing, a Development Conference may be held so that a tentative price can be agreed upon. If we can answer any questions on the information provided herein, please feel free to contact us. Sincerely, �� €� Orman C. Jurgens Supervisor `J K F . 1 MICROFILMED BY DORM MICR+LA9 CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES 9 City of Iowa C" -j �_____ MEMORANDUM -� DATE: October 10, 1980 TO: City Manager City Council FROM: Lyle G. Seydel, Housing Coordinator RE: public Housing 1. Attached correspondence from HUD is a result of a request for Preliminary Site Approval submitted August 29, 1980 for pro- perty located on the South side of Kirkwood Avenue between ex- tension of Van Buren and Webster Street. 2. Essentially HUD has indicated the site is not acceptable based on sale price and estimated development costs i.e. street extension or access, sidewalks, utility extensions and grading. Factors not considered by HUD but will have a bearing on increased development costs are the tree ordinance and the water management ordinance. Because the area is in excess of 2 acres any development proposed would be in compliance with all criteria. 3. It is recommended that an executive session with Council be scheduled to discuss possible acquisition and other courses of action. LGS/cf u 0 Mr. Neal G. Berlin, City Manager City of Iowa City Civic Center 410 East Washington Street Iowa City, IA 52240 x`! Dear Mr. Berlin: a �4 U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Region VII . Subject: SITE REVIEW hill . i ONice Supervisor IAOS-PO22-004 In Reply Rotor to, Service Office 210 Walnut We have completed Site Review on Site O1 on the above project. Our comments Det Abinn, lows 50009 October 1, 1980 Mr. Neal G. Berlin, City Manager City of Iowa City Civic Center 410 East Washington Street Iowa City, IA 52240 x`! Dear Mr. Berlin: ii Subject: SITE REVIEW IAOS-PO22-004 Iowa City, Iowa We have completed Site Review on Site O1 on the above project. Our comments `i are included below: Site 01 - South Side of Kirkwood Avenue between Van Buren and Webster Streets The properties to the north and east are primarily single family residential In the moderate price range. Properties to the south and west are commercial and light industry. The site has basically two building levels. The north.one-half is approximately 8-101. higherthanthe-south one-half. There is a very severe slope from the upper level to the lower level. There currently E1• is no access to .the south portion of .site. Extension of one.of the streets south of the site will be required as the slope from north,' to south would be excessive to run a street through from Kirkwood Avenue. The site has an older two story house with basement which is occupied. it that would have to be'razed to obtain full utilization of site. This would also involve relocation. Although grades are workable demolition is necessary and earth moving no doubt will be required.j j The site is currently zoned for light industry which, in our opinion, i would.be the highest and best use for the site. �I .. ' .. „ ',. f 1 1"t'( � •7'.r.� . F,.:_� 1..11 lir• .. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LA6 F: CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES 1 0." The HUD -52651 indicates the city is proposing 36 units or a density of 15 units per acre. This would appear to be excessive. Ten units per acre would be preferred. Also, there are a number of mature trees I on the north portion of site which should be preserved if at all possible. This would also affect density. The site is acceptable for family housing, however, it would appear that the cost for developing it will be excessive. First of all, the sale price is $185,000.00, as indicated in the city letter, appears very high for residential use.' This emphasizes that the site is not being put to highest and best use, especially when coupled with the cost to.extend streets for access to the rear area and installing sidewalk along Kirkwood Avenue. No comps were gathered at this time but it is our -opinion we will not be able to support the indicated sale price. Due to the many reasons stated above, we would not recommend this site for acceptance. If we can supply any additional information, please feel free to contact US. Sincerely, o� Jurgen Supervisor r {mac: Lyle Seydel MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES r, 1 City of Iowa Cr'�) MEMORANDUM DATE: October 13, 1980 TO: CityGGlIouncil FROM: City}�blanager RE: Ground Breaking, Ecumenical Housing Ground breaking for the Ecumenical Housing Project will take place on Thursday, October 16, at 5:30 P.M. The Council has been invited to attend, and the Mayor will offer short remarks. The actual ground breaking probably will take place along the Washington Street sidewalk. MICROFILMED BY JORM MICR+LAB CEDAR RAPIDS - DES MOINES 1994 W I i- . i.9