Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1976-02-10 Council minutesPage 2 Wbruary 10, 3976 ...� Adopt Resolution ,u.76-36 42, Refundin recorded in ;Res. Book 34, page g Cigarette Permit`Of Hawkeye,Shell_Service, 104 C4. Burlington, as recommended by the City-Cleer Adopt Resolution #76-37 Page 43, Refunding, recorded in Book 34, Co- dba/W-C._'s Cigarette Permit to National'- Vending mended b Restaurant, 830 First o N y the City Clerk as,recom- Adopt Resolution #76-38 44, Refunding Cigarettefpeecordedrmit o in Res- Book 34, page dba/Dick's Texaco, 301 Kirkwood Aveatiasarecommended b the ; Cit �g Co. City Clerk. Yr Adopt Resolution 876-39 45,.approving dbaClass C Beerecorded in. Permit App licatBook for� page Trip Cor /Quik-Tri Quik- mended`by the City P n509, 225 S. .,,Gilbert, Y Clerk.` as recom Correspondence: Letter; from David Schoenba Councilman Vever um regarding the issue of referred to d s eligibility. This letter has, been the City Manager for reply_ Letter _from -Alvy Wolfe regarding to the Cedar Rapids airport. This axi fare from.Ibwa City letter-has 'beenferred to the City Managrfor ePly_ re- Letter -from Richard M. Tucker re g the Cis Cate real estate located in Black's Park letterhasbeen quS Par 'y to:va- referred to. the Cit Addition- This y Manager for reply_ Letter from Sam Fahrconcerning the purchase < Showers property w of the /HCDA fundsre- . This letter has been ferred to the City Manager for reply. Letter from Robert Lehnertz expressing conc Cut in the Park This letter has ern for the proposed budget .Recreation budget. andbeen referred ts reply. o the City Manager for Approval of the Financial summary for .December, 1975, as presented by, the Department of Finance: BaymThe motion was carried`by the following roll call vote: er•nonerosse,-Foster, Neuhauser, Perret, Selzer, Vevera- Na s Ayes: Mayor Neuhauser noted receipt of (1) a letter from"HUD approving the 30-day extension for the HCDA'appl oatiom quested and (2) a letter from the Department'of:Transportatie which confirmed receipt of the tatement as re= the construction-of Freewayfrom the_. Cit - eluded <with the Final En which will: be reviewed ands. g called attention to Impact Statement. - and in `March '14 the' Congressional'rCit She also 16, which will be on Y.Conference;of Mayors, Council's consent hat she attendeVenue Sharing o- . which Dias Y• ask1ng given , Council Minutes 976 Page 3 February 10, ser announced the Iowa City Association of Pro - Mayor Neuhaufessional Firefighters, Localtithe PER Board 0, 1bis now y under the collective bargaining laws, y Mayor Neuhauser requested that the 'item concerning Iowa- State;Bank Building Plans on Block _101 be deferred until next -week. There were no objections. It was moved by Balmer and seconded -by Perret to, adopt Reso- lution No. 76-40, recorded; in Resolution book 34, page 46, Approv Bargaining Anreement Between the City and the ing theCollectiveBarg g Foster, Iowa City police Patrolmen's Association to eS edeProsse,JFos 1, 1976, through; June 30, 1978. Roll call: AY Neuhauser, Perret, Selzer, Balmer. Nays: none. Abstain: Vevera. Resolution adopted, 6/0/1. It was moved by deProsse and seconded by „Perret,_to adop47, t Resolution No. 76 -41, -recorded in Resolution Book 34; page on Setting Public Hearing -on Proposed Plans, Specifications, Contract and Estimated Cost -for the Washington Street Amenities Program at 7:30 p.m., 1976.' Roll call: Ayes: Foster; Neuhauser, Perret, Selzer,,Balmer, deProsse. Nays: Vevera. Reso- lution adopted, 6/1. Public Hearing was held on RezonEares sttof Westinhouseehe plum eand Triangular Tract, West of Highway 1, Ha ek read the North of I-80, from R1A to CH Zones. ;Attorney Y plaintiff's decree from the Johnson County District Court on the applicationwhich required the Defendant, (City of_Iowa City) legally rezone the property to a`reasonable commercial zoning Vevera. L le November 4, 1975: councilman Foster moved to consider voting on the Ordinance to rezone the land to,CH:, seconded by After further -discussion, Councilman Foster withdrew his motion,._-,.::_ but Councilman did not wighdrsw'his. almeroll call. -on Neuhauser,tSelzer,:,. Ayes: deProsse, Foster, Vevera. Nay Perret. Motion failed, 3/4. .There being -:no others present to speak the Mayor declared the hearing closed: It was moved by deProsse and secondedunanimouslyby Balmer to adjourn' the meeting o 8:20 P.M. Motion adopted, A moredetailedand complete description of activities of Council available in the City Clerk's_Office. �nti1A G Q1a eta u g e.� ayor J City Clerk Page 2 Council Activities • _ Special Meeting January 231 1976 , . An alternative process of .borrowing funds on-the private market at 4 or 4,1/2% would allow extending the_process.to August. Costs and benefits-- of thisalternative:were-discussed: On the recommendation of the City Manager and the City Attorney, the Council agreed by consensus that the City`should',- proceed :with -the normal close-out: schedule:'. Some discussion was held on using this year's HCDA.money ;. to-reduce the amount of Federal Loan: Mr. -Strabalat=indicated-'.. that there approximately was $800,000`which have not yet been ` expended. : Council requested that Alexander prepare written comments__, on the discussion. --- --. Councilman Foster called attention to page 8 of the`4th Addendum which "In states, theevent the Redeveloper requests.';: delivery of-the deed to any of theseadditional properties be-- fore it is certain'-that -the air rights will- be used by theCity., as provided herein, the City may require the Redeveloper_to de- posit with the City, the following • sums in the form of cashier's checks payable to the City as security for.the.performance of.; the agreement toconstructthe 'shopping mall in Blocks 83 and 84" which total--$307,880, which would bereturned to them when''_' the developer starts construction of the shopping: mall.; A. ter;,, discussion, it was moved by Foster and seconded by=vevera'that,--, old Capitol deposit with the City the 'sum of-$30Z 880 atc' such -. time`.as they request the deeds-for-the land.on the Capitol- Street right-of-way and on ' .the north 310 feet of the-east-1/2 Block':101; Page 3 • Council Activities Special Meeting January`23, 1976' 4. Councilman Balmer inquired if further diCouncil is going to have scussion-with the Board of Supervisors, relative to the Joint Law Enforcement Facility,:After discussion, = Mayor Neuhauser suggested the City ,get anjofficial them statement from so we have an idea if and how they want us to participate. Mayor Neuhauser advised communication -had been received from Senator Minnette Doderer'regarding.-.the viding a 6% ceiling for City spendi. Bill pro - nSena_- - gA Hearite on ;January, 2ng will be held 8th in Des Moines. She 'suggested _local 'arid other`:. legislators be contacted. Mayor Neuhauser hearing,,- plans o attend the . It was moved by Selzer and seconded by Vevera to adjourn.: the meeting. Motion adopted, deProsse absent. Mayor •: City:C erk ', • Page $ Council Minutes ' January 27,.1976 ' Roll call: Ayes: Balmer, deProsse, Foster. Selzer, Vevera. Nays: , Neuhausser, Y Perret, none. Resolution adopted; 7/0, It was moved by deProsse and' Resolution No. 76-25; .aeconded b Y Selzer recorded to Authorizingin Resolution. Book 34 adopt.: Execution of a:Contract and the_City for Street Between 'John page,30, R• Suchomel town Area. Sidewalk -and Alle Y Cleanup in the.;Down-'' Roll call: yes:- deProssePoster Selzer,-Vevera,°Balmer, . Postereuhauser Na s ''Perret, Y- none. Resolution ado It was moved b Pted, 7/0. Resolution 76-26 a Balmer and seconded by deProsse recorded in to ado in Resolution Book 34' q g the; Parks and Recreation . Aa e 31 call: Ayes: Plan, 1976-1980, t ,'Ado - Foster ,for,the it A deProsse, Nays: , Neuhauser, Perret,.Selzer, y'` Roll none. Vevera Resolution ,adopted, 7 0: Cit ' Balmer, Berlin noted in Manager the Capital'.Improvements-Pro might be-madein and this plan is ram y g some°changes a.guideline, It was moved by deProsse 'and seconded;_by.Selzer that the' recommendation by thePlanning the -Laws 'Zoning By and commission to Adopt,., Established by and for{the the 'Council • Commission be referred to Rules Committee for recommendation.,' unanimously, Motion adopted, 4 meetin. 10:30 P.M. g was moved by ,Motion ado seconded by Balmer to adjourn the P , unanimously, A more detailed and complete description of Council and disbursements activities of available in CitClerk's. Finance Department. Y Clerk s Office, and Mayor BY: , Abbie,Stol us, City C erk • Page 6 , Council Activities • January 27, 1976 Vevera, Balmer, deProsse, Foster. Resolution adopted, 7/0. ' Bruce Glasgow appeared ppeared regarding the rezoning of his tri- angular shaped tract oflandlocated west of Highway l; -and north of >I -s0." City Attorney Hayek _reviewed the history of.this:re- zoning. It was moved by Foster and seconded by =Perret`to set: a Public Hearing February -,for 10-1 1976,'to xezone the_ ract,of land from R1A to:CH Zone. -Chairman of the`Planning,and'Zoning' Commission Dr. Ogeson appeared advising that- their commission` had not been asked for an opinion on FW 518. Mayor -N- advised euhi advised that there a was timing problem, and Ogeson replied that if Council tells the Commission what it wants, they. will do their darndest. He expressed disappointment'in the proce= dure of the Council meetings, `and requested Council continue the joint meetings when P &-Z recommendations are overturned., After further discussion, the previous motion was adopted, unanimously It was moved by Balmer and seconded by Foster.to adopt Reso-. lution P7o. 76-22,:recorded in Resolution -.Book 39, page__25,_,Estab- lishing Stop Sign at the: Intersection of Post Road and=Rochester ` Avenue to stop Vehicles on Post Road= -Entering onto Rochester.: Roll call: Ayes: Perret, Vevera, Balmer,` deProsse, Foster, .Neu hauser. Nays: none. Abstain: • Selzer. Resolution adopted,.6/0. Ralph Oxford,` Super and Yellow Cab Companies, a garding the Resolution, Establishing '6 Additional�2-hour.Metered Parking; Stalls_ on the .North Side and West.End of -College Street. Bridge and 3 Additional 2-houMetered Parking Stalls on the'South r Side, West :End on the College Street -Bridge. After discussion, it was moved by deProsse and seconded'by,Balmer to adopt the` Resolution.; Roll 'call: -Ayes:deProsse,-Foster, Vevera. Nays: Balmer and Neuhauser. Abstain:' Selzer and Perret. :-Resolution failed, 3/2/2. _ It was "moved by Balmer and seconded.by deProsse to adopt Resolution 76 -23, . -recorded in Re solution.Book 34,;pages ;26 ands 27,_Authorizing and Directing`.the Director of Public Works to Request the AppropriateStateand Federal Agencies: to Amend the - Interim FAUS Route Map to Include theExtensions_of Jefferson and , Market.Streets, East from Dodge; Street to.Governor,Street and-. he Extension of, Governor Street, South from Market to Burlington. Roll call: Ayes: Vevera, Balmer, deProsse, Foster, Neuhauser', Perret, Selzer.. Nays: None. `Resolution>adopted, 7/0. It was moved by Balmer and seconded by Selzer,`to adopt Reso- lution 76-24, recorded in Resolution Book 34, pages 28.and 29,, Approving :the Revised Preliminary and Final Large.Scale Resi- dential Development Plan of Lot 24 ofMacBrideAddition,Part \• 1. Roll call: Ayes: Balmer, deProsse, Foster, ;Neuhauser, Selzer,' Perret,;. Vevera. Nays: none. Resolution adopted, -.7/0, - f A ,Y • Page 7 Council Activities January 27 1976 It was moved by deProsse and seconded by Selzer to adopt Resolution No. 76-25, recorded in Resolution Book 34,- page: 30, Authorizing Execution of a -;Contract• Between John R.-.-Suchomel . and ,the City'for°Street, Sidewalk and Alley Cleanup in the Down- town :Area. Roll call: Ayes: deProsse,' Foster,rNeuhauser, - Perret,-Selzer, Vevera, Balmer. Nays:_ -none. Resolution adopted, 7/0. It was moved by Balmer and seconded by deProsse to adopt' Resolution 76-26, adopt recorded in Resolution Book 39,:pagt ing the Parks and Recreation Plan, 1976-1980, for-the:City:_-Roll" ca11:4 Ayes: Foster, Neuhauser, Perret, Selzer, _Vevera, Balmer,• deProsse.: Nays: none." Resolution adopted, 7/0.: City Manager " Berlin noted in the Capital Improvements Program some changes.' might be made and this plan is aguideline. It was moved by deProsse and seconded 'by Selzer that the recommendation by the Planning and :zoning ;Commission to Adopt the By -Laws Established by, and for the Commissionr'be.referred:;to the Council Rules Committee for recommendation." Motion' adopted, unanimously. • -It was moved by Selzer and seconded by, Balmer to adjourn -.the meeting, 10:30 P.M. Motion adopted, unanimously.; _ Mayor City Clerk ; • INFORPIAL COUNCIL DISCUSSION FEBRUARY 10, 1976 8:30_ P.f1. The Iowa City City Council met in informal session on the _ 10th day of February, 1976, in the'Conference Room at the Civic Center at 8:30 P.M. Councilmembers present:,Neuhauser, deProsse, Foster, Balmer, Vevera, Schreiber. Perret, Selzer. Absent:' none. Staff- e members present: Stolfus, Miller,'Strabala, Rauh, StruveMayor Neuhau'ser presiding. ,:Keating; Councilman Selzer advised that he did, not yet have the infor- mation as to what various ParksandRecreation,programs cost: Acting City Manager Harvey Miller advised that the Staff was -work - Ing on it. Mayor Neuhauser noted that discussion would 'startwith the Public works Department Budget, Page; 39. Expenditures in 8300 -'- Transportation and Education were questioned. -._Concerning=the car policy, Assistant to the City Manager -Linda -Schreiber pointed out that the Staff -would be discussing the, policy tomorrow,;and " it would:.then come to Council. The Mayor pointed out that Council's general indication was to use as few vehicles as`possible. The raise for 7240 was in fuel costs. General discussion followed. Observation was made that ranking of Council priorities would-be helpful.. The,Ma or £or discussion,_CIP first, or budgets first. Finance Director Y questioned -procedure: Pat Strabala advised 'looking at the areas -of concern by`-using=the Tables on -pages A-6 and A-4, and then`advising`the staff to pare down or eliminate. He commented that they should also `address the Policy of additional or reduction of -staffing.' Millar .stated that besides looking at the percent ages,, the<actual dollar amounts `.should -be considered. Need to identify programs to be expanded and: shout to be decreased was noted.- Additional cost for Comprehensive: -:Plan was questioned, as_was -the recommendation to, not use -Feder -al -Revenue Sharing for operating expense,`but,then using $531,000 ' budget. Strabala 'explained, that in this it was to softens Potential over- reaction to budget cuts, sort of a -transition period. Councilman Selzer advised that he'did not support the $1.50 refuse charges suggested, and questioned the legality.::The of the budget was discussed. format The total amount of the Community Development budget was questioned, and Strabala pointed out the additions to the depart- rtent. _,The; method' of computing salaries for employees over'Range 13 was discussed, Strabala advising that -5.68 cost -of - living and 5% and merit on the `anniversary date been used. % Rollback on personnel cutting of programs were discussed. It was suggested that : Associate Planner and the Assistant Planner posithe tions be deft vacant._' Council also suggested eliminating the 58 merit for over Range -:13- Page 2_ Council Discussion February 10,`1976 employees. StrabalacautionedCouncil that they should indicate to, the City Manager that he should'decrease the staff: The:hir- ing freeze, with any hiring being j was discussed. ustified by:the City Manager, Concerning the police and fire, it was noted that an actuarial review of the departments had'recommended-the 248 and 298. Strabala explained -that Social Security andIPERS for the other employees equals about ' Administrative staff since 1973 108. The additions tothe, a 638 raise, was explained. It was suggested that individual department heads take-over Public relations in their departments. Also the Council not -.pend revenue sharing in this year's operating budget. Ma -1 asked if there was any support to cut yor-Neuhausend out sharing. It was noted that 4 persons had indicated It There was support for hiring., freeze, except when justified - to -Council. __She:pointed--:-:out-;that Council did not set any priorities, before the bof the election, and ,the observation udget; :;because was made that it should be`a continuing process during the year. It was suggested -that the. - Council keep their travel budget at -last`year's level.': -Increase to_seven_ members :and inflation were discussed. It was:also`sug- gested that 8300 -Travel and Education be reduced -to the levels Of FY 76 Budget;; several councilmembers agreed, noting that ''the City Manager should justify the expenditures (as he now does) Strabala suggested that Council not deal differently with white-collar workers than they do with the union -people, and ex- plained the cost -of -living previously worked out. It I was sug- gested that any raise be limited to the highest received by a Range 12 employee, probably $125 a month. 2t was that there is no executive salary pay plan. Another c pointed out omment. was that we do not pay our executive people enough money. Acting-- City_Manager,Harvey Miller advised that at the Wednesday -staff meeting, a.committee would be appointed to work 'out an y staff-.% -tive Pay plan policy, for employees above Range 13. Returning to ,discussion of departmental budgets, Council,das cussed Streets Budget, 'Plastino advised that the; snowplowing, salting and sanding policy could be amended, by 'not doing reg section streets. This would save on+overtime. Hills and inter sections ,and arterials could be salted. And and intenly , when the snow was 3" deep. In answer to how he could cut salaries," he advised that he could drop " -two positions, but would need'part- time help in the summer. They will also cut out mowing';o£_rights- °£-waY• Concerning cuts in capitaloutlay,could drop the purchase of material'-spreaderse(4)gorscut itadowthey ea two. He noted that the vacuum type street sweeper would be`° easier: to maintain. Councilman Selzer commented -that the; Down- town Businessmen's`Association'was workiP9.:on a, snow -removal ,pro gram. Plastino commented that PSchemmel Sewer, Mormon Trek ImprovementtroramshAsphaltdateServicedeletedBuild- aving''on Riverside:Drive (City owns land.there). 0. :n Page 3' Council Discussion February 10,.1976 Mayor Neuhauser called a short recess, 10:30 P.M_ Plastino had presented a memo and explained that in.1972 he had 11 employees and now he has 11 employees, and that with all the Urban Renewal work to do, requested that Council', not do ang,specia1 assessment projects. It was suggested-that-South Riverside Drive could be rocked. Council decided to leave the Schemmel sewer in, at this point, and to leave i.n`the asphalt-' at the Service Building. _Spruce Street Storm Sewer and 'Sidewalk Assessment had been moved to past '1981. Council then discussed signalization of_intersections_- Mayor Neuhauser suggested that all three beIdone. It was pointed out that the City Manager:is s for Scott`Boulevard. looking into property needOn the Traffic Control Function, it was suggested that the Engineering '_Aide be eliminated. Also purchase of the truck which would'be used for' the second crew to repair traffic lights was-explained: Plastino noted that there has been-only minimum repair in the last ten years.' They are planning to lay new cable"on Westlawn Curve. Preventive maintenance on Park Road has already been deleted.s There was'a short discussion on-signals or; stop signs for wash- ington St. Mass'Transit was discussed next. Superintendent Steve Morris explained the need for.two new employees, and the uses of the;. three",new buses from the UMTA grant.- He noted that he had pre- sented some modifications for the Wardway'route to the City Mara ger.--Council discussed _one hour headways,_for slow hours., such as.10:00'A.M. to 2:00 P.M., and it was suggested that figures'._ concerning savings%no savings be presented. They also,discussed a pass system, tied into the fare increase; cannot lease school buses as school needs buses at the same time city. does;` the money, in reserve to replace buses to maintain an average age of seven years; if,new "employees '.were not authorized, additional money-`_ would need to be added to part-time and overtime Eunds__ Council- man Perret asked for material on the, practical and impractical aspects of the use of to He asked for consideration of the alternative'of-a pass system, maybe $10.00-a month, and considera-,L; tion:of use of the two-mill`Special Levy_ This"wouldamount to $230,000. Councilman Perret stated that'he did not see just,ifi cation for a'25y fare, and suggested transferring other funds into'= transit from property tax allocations. He proposed that one.area!which could be cut was Public Safety,_as 48% of property tax'goes there.' Strabala'advised that this was because they could not generate their own funds. It was suggested that year-end-.balances could be decreased Councilman Perret pointed out potential conflict between transit and parking. The funding of the parking ramps in the HUD and Old Capitol contracts was discussed, and Councilman Perret suggested renegotiating the contract. Morris noted that if"Mass `Transit would ,pay for itself, private enterprise would be " interested.- Mayor-Neuhauser pointed out that we do not e get;.th subsidies that other large._cities do. Councilman Perret questioned