Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1975-06-24 Regular MeetingA,-_ 1 MINUTES OF A REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING JUNE 24,'1975 7:30 P.M. The Iowa City City Council met in Regular Session on the 24th day of June at _7:30 P.M. in the Council,Chambers at the Civic Center. Present: Brandt, Czarnecki, Davidsen, deProsse, Neuhauser. Absent: none. Mayor-Czarnecki presiding. It was moved by-deProsse and seconded by Davidsen .that the minutes read thus far `constitue'a £ull`reading of the minutes of the June 10,: 1975_Regular Council Meeting, and that Council approve _them subject to correction. Motion carried. Linda Fisher, 941 South Van Buren appeared requesting a one week deferral on the vote for amendments to the Urban Renewal `contract to allow for public reaction. Mayor Czarnecki advised that the matter would be discussed under Council Business, Item 7. A citizen appeared requesting carpenter work in this area in the _future. The Mayor ,pointed out that the City had only employment as a result of certain grants temporary openings for. It was moved by Davidsen andsecondedby Neuhauser that the of the meetings of the Airport Commission,.5/22/75 and Housing Commission of 6/4/75 be received and ,filed. Motion carried. It was moved _by Brandt and seconded by Davidsen that the minutes of the meetings of the Public Library Board e Trustees, 5/22.and Special meeting of 6/5/75;-Design Review Committee, 6/12/75 and 6/17/75; Parks and Recreation Commission, 6/11/75; 'Planning and zoning, 6/12/75; Steering :,Committee, 6/16/75-and Human Relations Commission, 6/16/17 be received - and filed. 'Motion carried. Mayor--Czarnecki called attention -to-the Landlord Tenant report ,from the Housing sub-committee on`July 16th. He also asked that as.discussed in-the Housing minutes,conversion from Section 23 program to Section-8 and compliance to Lease regulations be scheduled for informal discussion. In answer tothequestion concerning the Library personnel rules, the City Manager advised he would investigate. It was moved by Neuhauser and_seconded by Davidsen to approve the Design ;Review `committee's recommendation_ for sodium lighting on 15' standards, placed at 501 intervals, 2' candle levels on Washington Street with additional_lighting sources with the use of auxiliary lighting. Nvticn - CGP.rui"-9 � recommendation-for securing the services of a design specalist .n. Council Minutes; Page 2 June 24,:1975 on an as-needed consulting basis, it was moved by Davidsen e City s. and-seconded take by into considerationrandt to refer lasmittrelateser to hto the M g Welton-Becket contract. it was moved by Davidsen and seconded by_Brand teC°alista tMotionhe 1carron ieduthVoteeonhthelamended ring of a Design Sp - Specialist, but.to defer the motion, 'to authorize the Design Sp motion decision until'a recommendation is ..;received from City Manager concerning the Welton-Becketpointedout that traCa,Staff member is carried. The City Manag pointed the recommendation for working, with the Committee regarding and the Committee to coordination between Council, are d ed, adhered to and, ensure that Design Stanhe verre developles: Traffic, reviewed in total for the overall project. Examples: trash cans, phone booth design_and.placement, graphic designs and-signs- It was moved by Brandt and seconded. by Davidsenothe Review that advertising begin for a'-new additional member for the Committee, as they have requested. Motion carried. The City Manager advised that the Finance Department will have -a report concerning the re t th'Al from the Parks and Recreation CommmsFYi76 beadrawn-from,-sourcescother - support of the`SPI Grog ark and recreation` program than the currently >budgetedop fission would prefer that the levels, but if necessary,, e_Street Parkdevelopment - funds-`come from the remaining Pag fundsratherthan alternative #1 listed in Joe Pugh's memo of June 9, 1975. - Regarding the Commission's recommendation any Park andy permit persons of age _60 and over_to enroll Parksyand-Rec- Recreation class for a f1. eeof l noted that henhad additional reation Director Bill Nepp emission to take it :to the Com information and requested permission the recommendation mission for review. Neppl also, rep Park pool be opened reviewed by the Commissionon ahpilotat ebasis for eight weeks. at 12:OO,P.M._on Sunday rove it was moved by Brandt and seconded by Neuhauser to approve the recommendation. Motion carried. , It was moved by Brandt and seconded by Relatdeproions to Equal Opportunities and:Civi1-- receive and file the letter - from the Human Relations Commission , concerning the status of the Cit _structure, and refer it Rights commitment within the y' to the City Manager and schedule for discussion. Motion carried: announced that this was the time set for Mayor Czarnecki the public hearing ,on amendments 1975. It was moved by deProsseto the lgE and seconded by June 30, _ Page 3 Council Minutes June 24, 1975 Neuhauser to -adopt the Resolution Amending the -1979-1975 Budget. -Upon roll call Brandt, Czarnecki, Davidsen,_deProsse, Neuhauser voted 'aye'. Motion carried. There being no others present to speak, the -Mayor declared the hearing closed. It was moved by Neuhauser and seconded by Davidsen to' approve the Rules Committee minutes of their meetings on - May 19, 1975 and June 20, 1975 where matters relating to all Boards and Commissions were discussed and, -four ,recommendations were made. Motion carried. The City Manager advised we would move toward having the Staff.recommendations and Commission recommendations, with Staff reports used, together. come to Council Mayor Czarnecki announced discussion of the contract amendments to the Urban Renewal ._Contract 'with -Old -Capitol Associates. The Mayor pointed out -that -the Council had discussed -the Fourth Addendem at the informal session, yesterday including questions dealing with the lease arrangement on parking lot at Washington and Clinton, penalties and incentives and provisions concerning penalties relative to the deposit, and in the case of a default;process used for, price for the payment of the land, &--additional information. was received from the :Finance Department. Councilwoman deProsse-read'a-state- ment-into the record concerning her Viewpoints on the proposed amendments and other solutions, and stated that she would not support the O1d.Capitol Associates'_proposed amendments`. Urban Renewal Director Richard `Wollmershauser'gave a;brief rundown on, the changes outlined in the Fourth Addendum„'and -Finance Director Joe Pugh ;explained the financial data he had, presented. Marv`Hartwig, President oftheChamber of Commerce read a letter which was in support of the urban renewal contract provisions. It was moved by deProsse and 'seconded 'by Neuhauser to--receive,-and'file the letter. Motion carried.' Harold Bechtoldt appeared objecting --to the amendments to the contract and asked that the decision be Put off a.week. Robert Welsh presented a statement requesting staff and Council investigation concerning` comments made at yesterday's informal session. -- deProsse questioned a.provision on Page 8_ -concerning interest provisions relative to the City purchase of the -south -120' -- of Block 83. Sue Futrell, appeared representing-`-ISPIRG, asking Council to vote against the amendments -and to Postpone the consideration of them. Rosalind Moore, representing the Downtown Association appeared urging Council to accept and approve the. -amendments as in the best interests of the community. 'Charles Griffin, 711 Third Avenue, appeared requesting that the CPostpone ouncil p the vote until the public is informed. Marian Johnson, ostpone Council Minutes: Page 4 June 24,'1975 Road questioned what is actually guaranteed to be built. The' s 1) Plaza Mayor advised the addendum it waseiaoved.by Brandt and Elderly Housing for this year- seconded by Davidsen to adopt the Resolution Approving the Execution of Davidsen to the Urban Renewal Redevelopment - Contract with Old Capitol Associates, entitled the Fourth Addendum to Part I. Robert Welsh possibleresent6afactorsrandatheirt asking the Council to explore all p possible implication and to vote against adoption of the amendments. Each councilmember discussed individual concerns. It was moved _by Davidsen and seconded by deProsse to receive and file Welsh's two statements. Motion carried. It was moved by: Czarnecki and seconded by-Neuhauser to -substitute amotion to defer the matter for one week and ask the City Manager to investigate the fort. Councilcussed, and to determined,that-thelnformally amendments to review his rep _ would-be further discussed at execupointedsoutnthat the last tomorrow, Wednesday. The Attorney -p motion was not -in order.' it was moved by"Czarnecki and seconded uhauser to table the action on Councilman Br by Neandt's motion by Ne next Tuesday at n, the meeting at 7:30 P.M. Upon, untiandt rolll all next Czarnecki, deProsse and Neuhauser/voted 'aye', and Davidsen voted 'no'. Motion carried, 3 2. The Mayor called a five minute recess. t Of Mayor_ Czarnecki asked that item 15 be taroveen utheuFinal order, consideration of the, Resolution to App Plat for Pine Add`_n.t.from Schintler Bros. Construction crest Co., a replat of Lot 14 Weebers First Addition._ by Davidsen and seconded by deProsse-to--adopt'the Resolution. Upon roll^- call -ezarn tion carried. dAttorney RalpheProssei uNeuzil - Brandt voted 'ay - - thanked everyone for their -cooperation. on totter on the Human The-Mayor.called-atte ntiationsthe froncity Atrorney Hayek Relations' Commission Investig as previously explained. that the de It was moved by Brandt and seconded by109PE SWashington, letter. -from William Nusser, Hands„ Jewelry. regarding performance bf City crew on Washington Street Proj. be received and filed Motion carried. It was moved by deProsse and seconded by Neuhauser that the rules be suspended and the third reading of the ordinance Vacating the Following Alleys Relative to the R-1Blockb92- Vacatil.Project: Block 84', Block '101 -North 310', 'east 40', Block -102 -south 97 feet be given by 'title only. -- Council minutes— Page inu esPage 5 June 24,`'1975 Upon roll call Davidsen,-deProsse, Neuhauser, Brandt, Czarnecki voted 'aye'. Motion carried and third reading given by title only. It was moved by Davidsen-and seconded give uhauser to adopt.-the Ordinance.`' Robert se.the ata for discussion. `.The votei'.on the ordinance then taken, deProsse, Neuhauser, Brandt, Czarnecki, Davidsen voting 'aye' Motion carried and ordinance adopted, 5/0. Item #10 was adopted at the meeting on June 17, 1975. The following resolutions initiate the moved-by Library and Recreation Roof Repair Project: It was moved by public seconded by Davidsen to adopt, the Resolution Setting 1975 at Hearing on the Resolution of Necessityonoroll call Neuhauser, 7.30 P.M. in the Council Chambers. e Motion Brandt, Czarnecki, Davidseni dee ensandvsecondeoted d by Neuhauser` carried. It was"moved_bY - Engineer to Prepare to adopt the Resolution-Direcon r ll call;_IIrandt, Czarnecki, Plans and Specifications. UP Motion carried. Davidsen, _deProsse, Neuhauser voted `'aye,Neuhauser to 'adopt It: was moved by Davidsen and seconded by the Resolution Setting Public Hearing on the 15, j975 and 17, 1975 at 10.00 A.M. Upon roll call: Specifications and Form of Contract for July up Receive BidsonJuly_17, 1975 Neuhauser ,"Brandt voted 'aye'. Czarnecki, Davidsen, Motion carried. It was moved by Neuhauser and seconded by Davidsen to adopt the Resolution Awarding Contract for the Washington Street Improvement Project. ponC roll ckilvoteddNeuhauser, Brandt 'no'. Motion carried. e and sen voted 'aye'. 3/2. Council discussed the niftheenceineeresnestimate heItor's bid on the sidewalk vaults and the'eDavidsen to.adop - was,moved-by Brandri'and seconded by ResolutionrApproving_the Contract and Bond"eC Metro Pavers Inc..for:Washington Street=Improvement'`.Proj call_IIrandt,�-Davidsen, Neuhauser.voted:'aye';-Czarnecki and deProsse-_voted 'no=. Motion carried 3/2. The following Resolutions initiate the 1975 Asphalt Over- lay Program. <It was moved by Davidsen and seconded by Neuhauser _la adopt. the it Setting Public Hearing on the Resolution of Necessity for July 15,-1975 at 7o3grandt,1Czarneckin the ncDavidsen, Chambers. Upon roll_ call Neuhcarried. It was moved by Brandt deProsse voted 'aye'.. `the-Resolution Directing, and seconded by Davidsen to adoptecifications. Upon roll the Engineer to Prepare Plans and de Neuhauser voted call-Brandt,-Czarnecki, Davidsen, deProsse, !aye'. Motion carried. It was moved by Brandt and seconded a Page 6 Council Minutes June 24, 1975 Davidsen to adopt the Resolution Setting Public Hearing on Plans and Specifications and Form -of Contract for 'July. 15,'1975 and Receive Bids on July 17, 1975 at 10:00 A.M. Upon roll call Brandt, Czarnecki, Davidsen, deProsse,-`Neuhauser voted 'aye'. Motion carried. It was moved by Neuhauser and .seconded by Davidsen to adopt the Resolution Approving an Agreement for.the-Use -of the Iowa - City Landfill by the; City__ of_Swisher. :Upon roll call Davidsen, deProsse, Neuhauser, Brandt, Czarnecki voted -'aye'. Motion carried. - Item 15 was taken care of earlier. It was moved by Neuhauser and seconded by-'deProsse to defer the Resolutions Approving the -Preliminary ?and , Final Plat of -a Portion `of'Lot 3 o Ohl's Subdivision. Motion carried. _- It was moved by Brandt and seconded by Neuhauser that the letter from Mike Johnston, Northwestern Bell, 302 S. Linn, regarding rate changes on customer's July bill be received and filed. Motion carried. It was moved by Brandt and seconded by Neuhauser that the letter from James Colbert, Iowa -Illinois -Gas and Electric Company, P.O. Box4350,;' Davenport, Iowa, regarding the rate - adjustments on customers bill effective June 30, 1975,, and a filing for "a second adjustment effective July 1, 1975 be re- ceived and filed.and referred to the City_Manager and -City Attorney. Motion carried: It was moved by Neuhauser and seconded by Davidsen that-_ the letter from Attorneys Trott and Jansen` regarding preservation of the First Presbyterian Church as a`National Register` Historic Site be received and filed.--- Motion carried. It was moved by Neuhauser and seconded by Davidsen that the letter from Rebecca.: Johnson, 1100 Arthur regarding rules at the city swimming pools concerning wearing apparel inside fenced area be received and filed `and referred to the City Manager and Parks and Recreation Department. Motion carried. It was moved, by deProsse and seconded0by Neuhauser that the letter from 'John Patchett, State Representative, House -of - Representatives, Des Moines, regarding the municipal assistance fund that Iowa City will be receiving in the amount of 5264,000 be received and filed. Motion carried._ It was the general concensus of the 'Council to write letters of appreciation to the :legislators from our, area. Page 4 Council Minutes June 24;'•,1975 - Roadgue§tinned what is actually guaranteed to be built. The Mayor advised that the addendum proposes 1) I and 2) Elderly Housing for this year. It:was moved by Brandt and seconded by Davidsen to adopt the Resolution-Aop Execution of the roving the Amendment-to the Urban Renewal=Redevelo Contract with Old Ca itoT Assoc' ment Addendum "to Part I. — motes. entitled the'"Fourth Robert ' Welsh presented another statement asking the Council to explore all-,possible factors `and their possible implication and to vote against adoption of amendments. the Each councilmember discussed individual concerns. It- was moved by Davidsen and seconded, by deProsse to receive and file Welsh's two-statements. -Motion carried. ,It=was _ by_°Czarnecki by-Neuhauser mattend r to.-substitute-a motion to defer-the matter for one o week and ask-the City inManager to vestigate the incentives, discussed, and to meet informally` to-review his report. ,Council determined that.the amendments would be furtherdiscussedat executive session at 8:00 A.M. tomorrow, .Wednesday, The Attorney pointed out that?the last motion was not in-order.--it was moved by:Czarnecki- and 'seconded by Neuhauser to table the action on Councilman`-Brandt's motion until next; Tuesday at the regular meeting at 7:30 "gall roll P.M.` Upon` Czarnecki, deProsse and-Neuhauser ' 'aye', voted and Davidsen voted 'no'. Motion carried, 3/2. Brandt The Mayor called a five minute recess', Mayor Czarnecki asked that Item S of order, consideration t of the ResolutiontoeAtaroveutheuFinal- Plat for Pinecrest Add'n, from Schintler -Bros. Construction Co.,.a<replat of Lot 14 Weebers'First Addition. Fr _-It was moved by Davidsen and seconded by deProsse to adopt the Upon Resolution.' roll call Czarnecki, Davidsen, deProsse,,Neuhauser, Brandt 'aye'`. voted Motion carried. Attorney Ralph Neuzil thanked everyone for their-cooperation. The Mayor called attention to the letter on the Human Relations Commission Investi r% ations from Cit Atrornev Hayek as previously explained.' - ---- y - It was, moved by Brandt and seconded by;deProsse that the letter £rom William Nusser re Hands Jewelry,109 E.'Washington, erformance of Cit `J/� crew on Washin ton Street =Pro'. ; be-received be received and filed. Motion carried. - - It was tmoved by deProsse and seconded by Neuhauser 'that he rules be ,suspended and the third readin of the Ordinance Vacating the Following Alleys Relative to G' . the R-14 Urban RenewaliPro3ect:_ Block t$4; Block 101-Nor.th_310',=Tilocy Block 102-sout a,2- east 0h 97 feel be"giv'c rirle,;onlY; Page 5 Council Minutes June 24, 1975 Upon roll call Davidsen, deProsse, Neuhauser, Brandt, and third Czarnecki -voted -'-aye'._ Motion carried _reading title only. It was moved by Davidsenand seconded given'`by ` by Neuhauser-to adopt the Ordinance. Robert Welsh appeared for discussion. The vote4on the ordinance was then taken, ''aye'. deProsse, Neuhauser, Brandt, Czarnecki, Davidsen voting motion ''carried -and ordinance-adopted,-5/0. Item #10 was adopted at the meeting on June 17, 1975. The following resolutions initiate the Library. and Theby an�� 4 Roof Repair Project:_ It was moved in by 3. to adopt the Resolution SettPublic seconded the Resolution of Necessity for July 15, 1975 at Hearing on 7:30 P.M. in the Council Chambers. Upon roll call Neuhauser,,.- 'aye'.. Motion Brandt, Czarnecki, Davidsen, deProsse voted by Neuhauser carried. It was.moved.by_Davidsen_.and seconded Directing the E_gineer to Prepare to adopt the Resolution Plans and Specifications. Upon roll call Brandt, Czarnecki, ',aye.'. carried. Davidsen, deProsse, Neuhauser voted Motion and seconded by Neuhauser to adopt It was moved by Davidsen the Resolution'$9tting— ublic"Hearin on -the P1an1975dand G S ecifications and Form of Contract forJuly 15, 10:00 A.M. Upon roll 'c all 1l Receive Bids on 17:;-1975-at Czarnecki,-Davidsen, -deProsse „ Neuhauser, Brandt voted''aye'.-' 'Motion carried. It was moved by Neuhauser and seconded by Davidsen to for the Washin ton Street adopt: the Resolution Awarding Contract call Davidsen, Neuhauser, - Brandt f act. provement=Pr-Upon roll imoj and Czarnecki voted 'no'.' Motion carried. - voted-'aye',-deProsse %'Council discussedthedifference between. the contractor's 3/2. -bid-.on the sidewalk vaults and the engineer's estimate. It to ad was moved by Brandt and seconded by Davidsen Bond Metro Pavers ?0 ,?00 Resolution Approving the'Contract-and ll Improvement ProiectCzarneckioand 10-1 Inc for Washington Street call Brandt, Davidsen,_ Neuhauser voted 'aye', yl J deProsse voted 'no'. Motion carried 3/2. The following Resolutions initiate the 1975 As halt Over - by:Neuhauion lav Program. It was moved by Davidsen and seconded Public Hearing on the Resolution Jay Program. Resolution Setting il of-Necessity for July ,15, 1975 at 7:30 P.M. in theki, Davidsen, Chambers. Upon roll call Neuhauser;' Brandt, Czarneccki, It was moved 'by Brandt Ids deProsse voted 'aye'. -Motion-carried. econded by Davidsen to.adopt-the Xtesolution Directing _ and the Engineer to Prepare io Plans and SpecificatNeuhauseor rwotedl' ..Vldsen, deProsse, 0 r call Brandt, Czarnecki, 'aye'Motion carried. It was moved by Brandt and seconded _. Page 6 CouncilMinutes -June 24, 1975:<: Davidsen to adopt the resolution Setting Public Hearing on Plans and Specifications fU and Form of Contract for July, 15, 1975 and— Rece Bids on July 17, 1975 at 10:00 A.M. 'Upon roll call Brandt, Czarnecki;: Davidsen-deProsse,-Neuhauser voted 'aye'., Motion-carried. - It was moved by Neuhauser and seconded by Davidsen to adopt the Resolution Approving an Agreement for-the-Use-of the Iowa City lD �� � �) Landfill by the City of Swisher. Upon roll call Davidsen, deProsse, Neuhauser, Brandt,' Czarnecki voted 'aye'. -Motion` carried. -- Item 15 was taken care of earlier. It was-moved by Neuhauser and seconded by deProsse to defer the 'Resolutions-Approving the Prelimina _ /45 Plat -of a Portion of Lot 3 i d of Ohl's Subdvision.anMotionl carried._ - - It was moved by Brandt and seconded by Neuhauser that the-letter from Mike Johnston''Northwestern Bell' 302 S. Linn` -regarding rate Chan es on customer's July bill be-received and- sled.- Motion-carried. It was moved by Brandt and seconded by Neuhauser that the letter from James Colbert Iowa=Illinois Gas'and Electric Company, P.O. Box 4350,-Davenport, Iwa, re ardinthe rate g adjustments on customers bill effectiove Juner30 1975, and a- tiling-for a_,secor5 a 7ustment effective July 1 1975`be re- ceived and filed -and referred to the City..Manager and City Attorney. Motion carried. It was moved -by Neuhauser and seconded'by Davidsen that the letter from Attorneys Trr-t and Jansen regarding Preservation'- of the First Presbyterian Chu h as a-;National Register_ Historic Site be received and_fii.;c, Motion It was moved by Neuhauser and seconded by Davidsen that. the letter from Rebecca' Johnson, 1100 Arthur regarding rules 1�4% ' at the"city swimming pools concerning wearing apparel inside fenced area be received and filed and-referred to the City Manager and Parks and Recreation Department. Motion carried. It was, moved by deProsse and seconded-iby Neuhauser that the letter from John Patchett, State Representative'-House of Representatives, Des Moines, regarding the-municipal assistance fund that Iowa City will be receiving in the amount of 5264;000 e received and filed. Motion carried. It was the general concensus of the Council to write letters of appreciation to the legislators from our urea.`` AGENDA " • REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING June 24, 1975 7:30 P.M. Item No. 1_- MEETING TO ORDER - ROLL CALL Item No. 2 - READING OF MINUTES OF THE REGULAf COUNCIL MEETING ON JUNE 10, 1975. 69ti Item No. 3 - PUBLIC DISCUSSION. 1 7 \l (V' • r Item`No. 4 - RECEIVE MINUTES OF BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS. - a. Iowa City Airport Commission minutes of meeting of May 22, 1975. --Action: b. Iowa City Housing Commission minutes of meeting of June 4, 1975. Action: rs , I `:a s / . w. ! -J, , �,_ J c. Iowa 'City Public Library Board of Trustees minutes of meeting of May 22, 1975 and of special meeting on June 5, 1975. Action: • on June 12, d. Iowa City Design Review Committee minutes of meeting 1975, and on June 17, 1975. Action - • • a `� ,. :. _. -_. _ _ ..r :..:• r�'�,•L• it-� hit-•--..�1 t-�-�-i_ n. �.r _. _ _ .' -- - _ U k_ J - r ..c i _ ^ _.. lam- ♦f ' _—__ —_.._ r_.'.--._ .-� a -_. ._ a • '� • /l f - <.• _ _.__. _ r _ _ _- - _ __ — _ _ _ _ - c -L . F.: _. G.G. .-. l.i Agenda • Regular Council June 24 1975 Meeting 7:30 P.M. Page2 - Item No. 4 - (Cont'd) e. Iowa City Parks.and Recreation Commission minutes of meeting on June 11, 1975. Action:' f. Iowa City Planning and Zoning Commission minutes of meeting on June 12, 1975. Action; g. Iowa City Steering Committee minutes of meeting on June 16,1975. Action: - • h. 'Iowa City Human Relations Commission minutes of meeting of June 16, 1975. - Action: Item No. 5 - RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE CITY COUNCIL. a. Consider recommendations by the Design Review Committee: 1. For the approval of sodium lighting -on 15':standards, placed -------at-5O' intervals, 2', candle levels. (Sodium lighting would be in concealed source.) Additional ljghting sources -with the use of auxiliary' lighting. 2. For -securing, the services of a design specialist for a design specialist for a continuous consulting basis.�a 3.: For Coordination between Council, City staff and the Design : Review Committee to ensure that Design Standards are developed, adhered to and reviewed in total for the overall project. Examples: Traffic, trash cans, phone booth design and placement,- graphicdesignsand signs, : • - 4. To add a new member to the Design Review Committee. Agenda Council Meeting •Regular June 24, 1975 7:30 P.M. -_ - - Page `3 Item No. 5 - (Cont'd) - Action: - b. Consider recommendations by the Parks and Recreation Commission: - 1. That the City's financial support of the SPI Program FY 76 be -currently budgeted park and drawn from sources 'other than the levels, but if necessary, Commission would ` recreation program that the funds.come-from the remaining Page Street Park in Joe Pugh's prefer development funds rather than alternative #1 listed memo of June 9, 1975. - 2. That the City -permit -persons of age 60 and over to enroll.in any Park and Recreation class for a fee of $1.00. 3.1 That City Park pool be opened at 12:00 PM on Sundays on a pilot _ -- - basis for eight weeks. • Action: Consider request to Council by Human Relations Commission. c. Comment: See At1hed Letter: Action: _-- HEARING ON AMENDMENTS TO THE'18�MONTH BUDGET'(ENDING JUNE 30, 1975. Item No. 6 -PUBLIC A. CONSIDER RESOLUTION AMENDING THEf1974=1975 BUDGET.- Comment: Material sent to Council on June 3, 1975. r Action: Item No. 7 - BUSINESS FROM THE CITY COUNCIL. Rules Committee minutes of meeting on May 19, 1975, and June 20, a. 915 • T . - = - - . _ --- -' .. _.. i ' J � .. . _ — _ mow_-_ ... "• _. I � i _ __ � _.....__ _�� ... .,. 1; ._. __ ' �..l�l _ ___ �- __ _ ,. _v � � t ., :. - ._ > � �. � _%_ — .� +. j � fr • � � _ � _ _ _ w/ .— _...... � _ _. __.__ _ � � _:_ .. _. '_ ;:. _ _ _ � _.:. _ / - )+�'.. .._._ - - -. ,. _- -. _. __. ._ __ i - ._ .. .. ' �. _ ._ - "� - __ r s. 1 - i _ �.-_ _ __ :._ °j _ _. _ __ r ... ,i _ _.� __ z .. - _ - __ . - �- -. � t ,. ��_ -- - 1 w __ _. _.. :. =-- . _. _� -- -- --�-- - __ ._ _ -_ ..., _ .__� R iso. .- _ �.. ._—� .._. t� �- i __ r —� __ _moi_ _�,_ a it __ _ �_ �.. _ _._, .� e_ ._ ... _ ..._� it _•__ . _ _L ...4 ._� - - , rte- - / y. l : / F � r -- 5 n I r t _ - _ . e _ "- • j • ;' _ _ __ _- -- _ __..__ --- __ _ . _._ ___. - - � :; - -- � �- _- .-.- _z '_ ___. h _ _ - �. .�_ __ __... 1 >- _ _._ ...... _ � __ _. �_ __ .. - .,-._ _ _ __ ., _ _ ,. . ..-- _. _. .. _ ,.. __ .: _ - _- - - --- _ -_-�_ - t Y � ___--�--. __ _. . _-. ,:.__ . ��. �_._ _. __ _. . , -- �_ _. - ---- ___ ---� - --- ..__—. _ � _..I �..._ �..., _-. .. �. �. _ ... � i' _. _. �.... _....�L_t i .. .. 7�+ _ ._... _. ..,. _.. c:: -. ..._vim. ��..�_��.. _ _ .. �. .. _ _ �. �{ . _ _ �_. ��. i <� L �! � .. t � _ . . � Vii. .� r vis i " f - ra _� Agenda Regular Council Meeting June 24, 1975 7:30 P.M. . Page 4 - - Item No. 7 - (Cont'd) 0, _0 Item No. 8 - REPORT ON ITEMS FROM THE CITY MANAGER AND THE CITY`ATTORNEY. a." Letter on Human Relations Commission Investigations by City Attorney.— b. Letter from William Nusser, Hands Jewelry, 109'E. Washington St., regarding performance of City crew on Washington Street Project. y , Item No. 9 - CONSIDER ORDINANCE VACATING THE FOLLOWING.ALLEYS RELATIVE TO THE R-14 URBAN RENEWAL PROJECT: -BLOCK 84 BLOCK 101`- NORTH 310 FEET ,`BLOCK 82 -'�':rT�'H�-E(EAIST 40 FEET, AND BLOCK 102 - THE SOUTH 97 FEET (THIRD READING). -.. .Action: U C l /' Lr�i DI.JI FJ_ I a 10 - AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING AND DESCRIBING A`VOTING PRECINCT WITHIN -THE IFI ALLY'PRECINCT CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE ;CITY,. -OF IOWA -CITY, IOWA,-SPECC NUMBER -9, -AND AMENDING ORDINANCE.NO 7272623, AND ALL ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT HEREWITH. - Comment_:__ The purpose of this Ordinance is to establish the new boundaries for Precinct Number -9, -Said precinct's boundaries had changed -as z result of annexations since the adoption of Ordinance No. 72-2623. • -Action:_'- - - Agenda •Regular Council Meeting , June_724,__l975 _ 7:30 PM Page 5 Item No. 11 - CONSIDER RESOLUTIONS INITIATING THE LIBRARY AND RECREATION ROOF - REPAIR PROJECT. t<s� A. CONSIDER RESOLUTION SETTING PUBLIC HEARING ON THE RESOLUTION _ OF NECESSITY FO¢ JULY 15, 1975 AT 7:30 R M. ; N THE COUNCIL hL-t a.�. CHAMBERS. / D•t sQ-y 70 /V a<�t :S-16 -CONSIDER RESOLUTION DIRECTING -THE ENGINEER TO PREPARE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. Da I l / �� CONSIDER RESOLUTION SETTING PUBLIC HEARING ON THE PLANS AND Y SPECIFICATIONS AND FORM OF CONTRACT FOR JULY 15,-1975, AND RECEIVE BIDS ON JULY 17, _1975, AT 10:00 AM.. _ - v Comment: The -above resolutions are necessary to initiate the roof repair jobs _ for the Library and the RecreationCenter. Action: Item No. 12 - • CONSIDER RESOLUTION AWARDING` CONTRACT FOR WASHINGTON STREET IMPROVE- MENT-PROJECT. THIS RESOLUTION APPROV�S AWARD OF BID. r L _ e. CONSIDER RESOLUTION APPROVING THE CONTRACT AND BOND FOR METRO /2-1 1 PAVERS, INC. FOR WASHINGTON STREET IMPROVEM NT -PROJECT: Comment: This project was discussed at a public hearing field June 17, 1975, as item number 7. Action: Item No. 13 - CONSIDER RESOLUTIONS INITIATING.THE 1975 ASPHALT OVERLAY PROGRAM.- " A— A. CONSIDER RESOLUTION SETTING PUBLIC HEARING ON THE RESOLUTION ' OF NECESSITY FOR JULY 15th, 1975 AT 7:30 P.M. IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS.' Dp l J1Gct . �tL ._/ wLn ct"e� ?�G B. CONSIDER RESOLUTION I ECTING THE/ENGINEER TO PREPARE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. (19 Pit r C. CONSIDER RESOLUTION SETTING PUBLIC HEARING ON PLANS AND SPECIFICA- TIONS AND FORM OF=CONTRACT-FOR JULY -15,,.1975, AND RECEIVE BIDS'ON -}' JULY 17th, 1975 at 10:00:A.M. V • Agenda Regular Council Meeting June 24, 1975 7:30 P.M Page 6 - Item No. 13 - (Cont'd) Comment: The above resolutions are necessary to initiate the 1975 Asphalt Overlay Program. Under this project West Melrose and various:. _ other streets in town will be°surfaced-with -a two-inch asphalt ` overlay. The amount budgeted for this project`isI5150,000.00. Action: Item No. 14 - CONSIDER A RESOLUTION APPROVING AN AGREEMENT FOR: THE USE OF THE -IOWA CITY,_LANDFILL BY -THE CITY OF SWISHER. Comment: The, City of Swisher has requested the use of the Iowa City landfill in - a manner similar totheuse.extended-to other governmental agencies by the City Council in the'.past. The City of Swisher has executed our standard agreement and this resolutionwould approve the agreement and authorize its execution. Action: (� e,« ' k • Item. No. 15 - C -- CONSIDER RESOLUTION TO APPROVE THE FINAL PLAT OF PINECREST ADDITION. S-7507. Comment: The subject plat is submitted by Schintler Brothers Construction Company, Inc., as a,repla n of Lot 14 of Weebers First Addition and located east 'of.Weeber Street and south of. `Harlocke Street. The Planning andZoningCommission on June 12,1975, recommended by `a 5 to`0 vote, approval of the subject, -plat -as -submitted. --= Action:/61�1 �j Item o. 16 - CONSIDER RESOLUTIONS APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT OF A PORTION OF LOT 3 OF OHL"S SUBDIVISION. S-7504. Comment:- The Planning and -Zoning -Commission on May 8, 1975, recommended by a 5 to,O vote approval- of the subject rreplat.subjectrto-the following - contingencies: - 1. That Lots'6 and 7 be served by a public sanitary sewer at an appropriate time. • 2. That storm/ water runoff be enclosed within -a storm sewer. _ c_ r - _ ��l �i2�•-r�r . JJ .. .. L2 lam' J.r/H 1` �!• �_` l.U-�u-_s-�._ :_f: _--______. - I--- -- -f \1 ,. - .�. !� �•i{. �3 %OM1 _ � J � f_ Agenda Regular Council Meeting • June 24, 1975 7:30 P.M Page,? - Item No. 16--(Cont'd) 3. :That a separate granting of necessary easements for -the install- ation of'services -be made across`a`parcel of land not included within the subdivision but: located.between Lots l and 2 and Lot 3. Relative to the first contingency, public sanitary sewer service is required to'be provided to each lot subdivided. _Lots 6 and 7, however, are Ipresently occupied by the Plamor Bowling`Alley: The Commission recommended that sanitarysewer, service be provided at -such, time; as - Lots -6 and 7:are -sold off or at another "appropriate time". Relative to contingency 2, the Commission recommended that an open ditch along the rear property line be enclosed within`a storm sewer in accordance with City policy either 'by=assessmentor at City expense; the subdivider is not required to install said storm sewer.because of an agreement =`---: followingza-'law `suit. - - - Actions • Item No. 17 - CORRESPONDENCE TO THE CITY COUNCIL. a. Letter from Mike "Johnston, `Northwestern Bell, 302 S. Linn, regarding rate chap es on customer's July bill. Action: h F _ v b.- Letter from James Colbert, -Iowa -Illinois Gas and.Electric-Company, P. 0. Box 4350, 206 E. Second Street, Davenport, Iowa, regarding rate adjustments on customers bill effective June 30, 1975, and a filing for a second adjustmentt� effective July 1, 1975.%y Action: 5 A, v c. Letter from Attorneys Trott and -Jansen,` -9 S. Linn St., regarding preservation of theFirstPresbyterian Church as 'a National Register` Historic Site. -/ J ��l Action: Yl�e�.�I !�n ✓L /; ��o Agenda Regular Council Meeting • ' June 24, 1975 7:30 P.M. Page °8 -=.- --Item No. 17'- (Cont'd) d. Letter from Rebecca Johnson, 1100 Arthur #J-7, regarding rules at city swimming pools concerning wearing apparel inside fenced area. �iC:e.i ��c. I,/ �'�✓� �� `\ - Action: 1L , e. Letter from John E. Patchett, State Representative, House of Representatives, Des Moines, -Iowa 50319, regarding the municipal assistance fund -that Iowa will be r/eceiving. d .7L �, oab. City Action: Dci� A F('e, C, � �✓�//�-LK—�..—Cis-riv. . �{.xi-+-• Cl�c.c.��• -:.. f. letter from John Daniel, Iowa -Illinois Gas and Electric Company, regarding a meeting on Tuesday, 'July 1, 1975, to conduct discussion on area outlook for gas and electric service. ✓ • Action:—/.�Jt JL lel n .�Q. . Vii_ v Item No. 18 - ISgUANCE OF PERMITS. a. Consider Resolution approving Class B Beer applicationfor Iowa City Pizza Company dba/Shakeys Pizza Parlor, Highway 1 West. Action: + I - b.- Consider Resolution approving Cigarette Permit applications. Action: % C. ConsiderRes. A rov. Class B Liquor L' on Q or -Howard Johnson's, N. Dodge Item No. .19 - PUBLIC.DISCUSSION. d. Consider Res.-Approv. Class B Liquor License Sunday Sales A ligation for Howard Johnson's,N. Dodge Consider Res. Approv. Class C Liquor-License=,Application forE E C Hdba/Gabe N' Walkers 330 E Washington ` sj bus iness--ccne from? 1 believe :his concern is extremely valid. ;iihat if the mall does undermine the viability of the remaining dowoEown? What then? Another Urban Renewal? How successful would a Bremers or a Stephens be if it was buil-'o rt Lower Muscat9ne Avenue? tlith the close proximity of the,Syca;ure idall I think that more than likely it would not be much of a financial success. The comparison day be simplistic, but I think it must be drawn to serve as a example-whan we make the decision about what to do with the future of Urban Renewal in Iowa City. The atmosphere in City Hall has been remarkably quiet ever since the developer requested the contract ame dnments. There has not been the pressure to accept the. proposed changes as there was to sign the original contract. I know this is because other people share the concerns I have expressed above. It's as tboueh we have been given breathing time in order to correct a serious flaw 'in the design of downtown: In addition, I believe the latest staff report, issued June 20, 1975, reinforces 50-:e of my earlier reservations rather than eliminating th ,m. I sugcested'over a year ago that we shouldn't be concerned about the "short run" if the "long run" 1was going,:_ to -prove to be detrimental to the goals we wanted to achieve. The report emphasizes over and over that if it ttiere just the short run we were concerned about we 'would not have embarked on any Urban Renewal plan. Of major concern in the report is the suggestion that it may be difficult for the City to finance the mall parking ramp. An excerpt from page 11 of the report reads as follows: "Although a specific financing plan has not been recommended, it can be said for certain that the current climate for parking revenue bonds is not what it eras , LWO years ago,nor whatitis expected to be two years from now. In our opinion, i -t is doubtful that the City, even with the excellent credit rating that it now maintains: could successfully sell parking revenue -bond: today with a 7c/ interest rate - ceiling.- This would be a certainty if it were attempted without a demonstration that major de;,iaI'd generator would be assured." The report makes clear- what. the -finance: -.:Director ha iniorm,rlly lrrirl tht: foum-,Il for, :nuw lure; Par',ing as rr.1nuir`ed in the present contract is precarious. If one assumes that 2 - *Completion refers to entire residential/commercial improvement. • -2- 2. 'Schedule D is amended to read as followsc - SCHEDULE D CONSTRUCTIONCOiLMENCEMENT AND COMPLETION SCHEDULE Parcel No. Commence Estimated Completion 81-3 Sept., 1975 - Sept., 1976 81-4 Sept., 1975 Sept., 1976 103-3 -Oct., 1975 Oct., 1976 102-3 - Apr., 1976 Apr. 1977 102-4 Apr., 1976 Apr., 1977 101-2 July, i976 *" 5 Years 93-1 Apr., 1977 *,-5-Years- Years83-1 83-1 July, 1977 May, 1979 - 84-1 July,; 1977 May, 3.979 65-4 Apr., 1978 Apra, 1979 -.- 82-1 - July, 1978 June, 1979 102-1 Apr., 1979 Apr., 1980 102-2 Apr., 1980 Apr_, 1981 64-1 - July, '1979° July, 1981 65-2 Apr., 1980 Apr., 1981 *Completion refers to entire residential/commercial improvement. Iowa City-Airport Commission May-22, 1975 Civic Center Engineering Conference Room ,MEMBERS PRESENT: Gary. Bleckwenn Elliott Full David Hartwig Jack Perkins- Claude Peterson erkinsClaude'Peterson MEMBERS-ABSENT: : None SUMMARY OF DISCUSSION AND FORMAL ACTION TAKEN: Chairman Hartwig called the meeting to order at 7:30 P.M. ;Minutes; of the Commission's :April 17th meeting were presented. Peterson readmoved Perkins second the motion, that the minutes be approved as Motion carried. Bills for the month were presented. Bleckwenn moved Peterson second the motion, .bills _be paid as presented. Motion carried. Attorney Barker presented a resolution and amendment to ;the lease be- tween Iowa._City _Flying_Service and the Airport Commission. Copy of ase attached. General Discussion Resolution and Amendment to le followed. Peterson, moved Perkins;; second the motion that the res- olution be adopted. Motion passed as follows: - AYES NAYS X Bleckwenn X Full X -....Hartwig X Perkins -- X =Peterson Jones stated he had Dick Burger, of Burger Construction, look over the restrooms in the terminal building to give the Commission an estimate on improving.them. Mr. Burger estimated he could`do the following work for around $2,500.00. Mens Restrooms: new partitions, light fixtures, new floor, surfacing, replace some ceiling tile, and paint the-ceiling. Ladies-restroom: new light: fixtures, new partition hardware=and:painting"the partitions, some ceiling'tile replaced and a to coat of paint. Bleckwenn moved Perkins second the motion peed have Burger Construction do the work ,'<but also to have a low salso had peed exhaust fan installed in the men's restroom. Motion carried. Jones Mr. Burger look over the doors of the old united--hangar-to extimate the cost of repairing so that the big hangar doors could be closed every night. Mr. Burger stated it would have to be-strictly time ,and mater,General discussion followed. Jones also reported Nate lectric,has;promised to have the 3 phase electrical systemMoore in- materials: stalled in the old united hangar by June 15th. ` Peterson mentioned that the old wire ane sorebandhwithcthedcommissin sf the old united hangar was creating an eye awM1�>rW ��,s`£��. approval he would remove it. The Commission aCG0_Pted There being no other business the meeting was adjourned at 9:15 P.M. Next meeting June 19, 1975, Civic Center; Council Chamber, at 7:30 P..M. . - MINUTES IOWA CITY HOUSING COM14ISSION--' JUNE 4, 1975 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY• -DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCEROOM MEMBERS PRESENT: Branson, Bosserman, Fountain, :Hibbs, '__,Kamath <I MEMBERS ABSENT: -Retish, Sheets. CITY STAFF PRESENT: Seydel, Iiillis. - SUMMARY OF DISCUSSIO14 AND FORMAL ACTIONS TAKEN: Branson called the meeting to order. 1. ;Bosserman moved that the minutes of the meeting of May 21, 1975, be approved as written. Fountain seconded the ` • motion. Motion passed unanimously. 2. --There was no public discussion. 3. Coordinator's; Report. Seydel-submitted seven applications -and recommended approval of all seven. Seydel requested that three of the applications be considered as Priority I'instead of Priority II in assigning priority preference. Two of these applicants are.; presently enrolled as students and are receiving money through the Special Services Support' Program. One of the ` applicants will probably be participating in this program. : The ;Special Services Support':Program utilizes federal money and -is'replacing the WIN Program. WIN participants would be considered Priority I. Since there were no objections,` these applicants will be considered the same as WIN students and willbe given Priority T -ratings. There are 198 units presently under lease. One unit is empty and being shown. Seydel--discussed HUD Notice 75-17, which concerns conversion from the Section' 23 program to Section 8. This is: the subject of a.special meeting with HUD, Des Moines, to be • held in July. It -appears that there will:- -be-little choice and the present program will have to be converted too -Section 8. -z- • [IUD Auditors found the Housing`Authority's lease did not comply with all HUD regulations. 'Specifically, -conflict-:of interest and additional--insurance=information. - _-- -.. Seydel has written a new lease to be studied by the- commission members.' Seydel stated that there is in existance a rule - ulethat-he that he'cannot lease from members of the Housing Authority, - Housing -Commission or -employees of the Department of Community Development. Kamath suggested that this definition might be broadened to include family members. ; The results of the Equal -Opportunity -Review have been received. 'It was recommended -that '_applications be date; time - stamped. Also that the Authority; collect -racial' -and ethnic " data. The applicationswill be date stamped in the future. 'Racial and ethnic data will be entered on the application in the form of code. This will be the same code HUD utilizes. The Annual Contributions Contract for the elderly housing has been signed and sent to HUD Des Moines. - 4. Old Business.' - ' Branson has met with Tony Kushnir, Assistant City Attorney - • ; concerning the proposed Tenant -Landlord Ordinance. The Council does not want a specific ordinance from the Housing Commission. 'They would'like.to have specific items to be included in an ordinance. -- Branson appointed a sub -committee to work on the Tenant - Landlord ordinance consisting of Kamath (Chairperson), Sheets, Hibbs, and Branson. s: "Kamath 'expects 'to have the sub -committee's -report finished prior -to 'July 16, 1975. 5. Bosserman moved and Fountain seconded the motion - that the meeting be adjourned. -Motion, passed unanimously. Next Meeting -- June 18,`1975. Approved W/lfc,c:;_: L�- • -2- • New Business: The Board accepted a motion to request=' • that the City.Council accept the..Draft of the Library Ordinance, substituting. (see attached memo to City) the Ibwa Code wording in Section I. President Auchan appointed a nominating` committee, consisting of. Chairman Bywater;`Trumpp`and Downer to pare, a_slate of officers -for -the set the June 'board meeting one pre- next regular meeting. A proposal to 'week early was accepted unanimously. The meeting adjourned at 5:25 P.AI. Respectfullysubmitted, Davi ii -man, ecretary Q `L'V "" r L cl UL M -E-41-0 • TO: City Council i•RO}1: Library. Board o l Trustees RE: Library Building Consultant DATE: May 29,-1975 • i..-.-t^n statr:intnt %i1.1 cnablo t.lic lw;ird and staff - to ma::c intnri� 6/12/75 -2- d) By usingvarious types of fixtures and refractors light can be altered. [ • e) Consider the use of sodium on 30`foot pedestals'and -` ---mercury on 10 to 1S foot pedestals. ? 2. Response -to John Wetzel's explanation: w a) While the explanations of Wetzel.reflect some of the t; }: - advantages:of sodium vs. mercury,- there is,no,;refer- ence to` whether the,sodium will be of quality, inten- sity, and also "give theme and effect aesthetically. b) Brian Gutheinz expressed"concern'about `that emphasis, - stating that light can be used to alter, soften and accent.` 8e proposed that a starting point might be for the Committee to view the various lighting condi- tione`.of-the City and study the -many variables which --might, enter -into a -decision. c) Brachtel`stated that the City staff is aware of pro- blems presently<existing -with Welton -Beckett plansin -that the proposed placement of"lighting does not con- +^r form with the physical barriers.- d) Dick Plastino state Id that a decision should be made • immediately on the lighting problem. There are two weeke left. - 3. Ideas to present to Welton -Beckett by Plastinod - a) too much uniformity - _b) a'lower levelofpedestal -, c) question their use of sodium vapor as poses problems aesthetically `and _physically, 4. The issue appears - to be the design of light and how it is used- =-not -what kind -of -light to use. a) The Committee will_meet at "Things" 9:00 p.m., Monday June 16th for a tour of the City's present lighting. ADJOURNMENT • MI. MINUTES. IOWA CITY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION • JUNE 121 1975 --.4:00 P.M. CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS - MEMBERS PRESENT: Ogeaen, Horner, Cain, Jakobsen, Larew' MEMBERS ABSENT: Blum, Madsen - STAFF PRESENT: Schmeiaer, Child RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE CITY COUNCIL: 1. To approve S-7507, Pinecrest Addition, final plata replat of Lot 14, Weeber's-Addition). ` 2. To appoint Commissioner Richard.Blum as a representative Commission's Area to the Johnson `County Regional Planning_ Transportation.Study,Policy Committee. REQUESTS TO -THE CITY MANAGER FOR INFORMATION OR STAFF ASSISTANCE:'- - - None_ LIST OF MATTERS PENDING COMMISSION -COUNCIL DISPOSITION:- • 1. 72-04. -Board of Adjustment Appeal Amendments. 2. P-7317. Creation -of a University Zone (U). a Mobile Home Residence Sone (RMH) 3. P=7410. Creation of. Objectiona,to prohibited and non -conforming signs. 4. C-7405., Council referral: 11/6/74. 5. P-7503. Revision of Ml and M2 Zones. SUMMARY OF DISCUSSION AND FORMAL ACTIONS TAKEN: Chairman Ogeaen called the meeting to order and asked if there the minutes of the meeting -were.any additions or corrections to Jakobsen suggested that the held on May 22, 1975. `Commissioner 3, third toread Cmade sbyoner minutes be amended on page motion Of -".Commissioner: -Blum ...-.... 22, LareW ...".instead Cain and seconded, by Horner .to approve the_ -minutes of the May unanimously, 5-0. 1975`meeting, as 'amended, carried 5-7507. Pinecrest Addition. Final plat. `A replat ofLot14, 5/28/75.- 45 -day limitation: Weeber's Addition. Date filed: 7/12/75. • - r Ci tiz^n's Steerinn_Committee for the Housing and Community Development Act (Citizen Involvement' Committee) .-� Minutes of Meeting held on June 16th, 1975 Members Present: Amidon, Bridgeman,-Sando, Dalry+ple,_Eaum, Hall - Others Present: Ed.Czarnecki, Carol 'deProsse, Piary Heuhauser, Penny Davidsen IL was decided by members of the Committee` attending the June 2nd'r.;eeting o i)dCOuiO a'FO!'ndllZed COmmlttee.--Cpunc'l-.persons were.invited to:--.the'.meeting of"=-.- the 16th to discuss the initiation of. -formalization procedures, and to give the Coicmi-tee°insight as to how each Council ;person envisions the future functioning of the CIC_ No minutes viere made of the meeting on June 2nd due to the lack.of members present. Views presented at the June 16, 1975,, meeting included the Committee as an advocate -for -low and moderate income; persons, with such business as suggested distribution of funds (revenue sharing,`CIP, etc.) which directly affect these groups. The human needs planner, when hired, was suggested as the logical City; staff person`to_providz inForma-ion and assistance to the Cc.mittee. -A review" of the current standing of projects funded under the-HCDA o` 1974 was also suggested. Composition of Committee membership was discussed with the general opinion being that it can remain basically the same in the future. The Rules Committee will submit steps to be taken for formalization of the CIC; as well as possible by-laws for the group, to the CoT.nitten for review at- • its `r t m>_eting. Corr ittee members will also present ideas for by-laws and a statement of purpose. Thoughts For summer blrsiness; plans for reaching low-income persons and receiving input from then; look:ng'`into housing code enforcement and rehabilita•. tion, possibly suggesting criteria .for selection -,of persons to receive -housing rehabilitation loans, as funded by HCDA of 1974; -"tying up loose ends"-- report of what -the Committee has accomplished,'its expenditures, where it's heading. Thea Sando and 5leatherill Winder have resigned fromtheCommittee. Horace Amiden wilt now be the Senior Citizen representative. The next Committee meeting is scheduled for -;June 30th, at 7-P.1,11. in the Council Chambers. Respectfully submitted, Claudia Dalrymple, Committee Member City-Park = Mercer Park -- Recreation..-Center Total Sun.Ave. Total Sun.Ave. Total Sun. Ave. June i 20,673 1,232 � 20,144 760 8,100 270 July 20,183 906 21,225 884 7,536 251 Aug. 14,912 1,008 16,242 658 51818 194` 1974 June 15,689` 641 11,461 377 7,602 250 ,July ) 32,821 11429 25,937 1,001 7,244 273 Aug. 6,406 322 4,417 230 4,598 143 33 i An increase in available hours for swimming will be a convenience for some people but I -do not believe you will increase the total patronage. 9 �_-perience of other cities indicates pool patrons spread out or contain their use over what ever hours are available -to -them. , SourceOfFunding Existing Positions' - Sec. 23 Title XX Local- HCDA R-1" - Housing 1 Admin_ Pln Activities �— 1008 Dirac tOr -. %5% Ass't Director - S2rior Planner 100% Assoc. Planner Assoc. Planner - - 100% -. Tec'. A55ist3nt 100% Tech.- Assistant - Zoning Inspector 100% - 100% _ - - Secreta y Housing Inspector 100% housing Inspector 1000S o, SOa !lousing coordinator 50^ 100% Housing -Specialist 100% Clerk Typist Redevelopment So acialist 100% 100% Clore Typist provosed Positions 100% Senior Housing In3p. 100°, Housing Inspector - 80% ., 20 Suzan Meads Coordinator - _ 200 Asst. Planner 20% Ass t. planner - - r,_d,,elo_ment Coor`d. 50% 50% ..100 Senior_ Planna= - 25 d _. 75% - Cler's T;-pist -•" -.- - CITY OF IOWA CITY _ - - `1974/75. BUDGET AMEtiDMENTS 18-MONTH -.� - :18-MONTH _.. - PROPOSED_ DID _ �:_ ..: •: - - COMM 11'. .APPROVED _ _.BUDGET AMEPIDMENTS '. `. ._. _ E22/.PROGRAM one-third of the amend-'_'-__ General_ 1,405,433 $ - 335,218 $ 1,740,651 Approximately ment to the Administration'Program is Administration $ necessary for, salary; increases that. not anticipated during the last were 18-month period. Other major-changes.. - `and increases include_$50,000.for the,-; - - -.-`Civic 'Center Roof Repair Project; 521,600: - $51,000/Aid to Other Agencies% for the special census; $23,300 i.n in additional` termination pay; $18-1 0 $12,000 in additiot insurance premiums; _._. fees; and approximate a1-City Attorney were, $8,000 in election`expenses:_that not budgeted. The balance of the amen went increases are fora variety of=. operating ezPenditures that exceeded-.; - budget estimates. -. 678,537 This amendment is necessary,. pray Stud 600,549 77,988 $20,000 for the River Corridor Ccumnmi-tY .Development 525,000 for the staffing and relate - expenses necessary; for the,developmen' Plan du., of the comprehensive -.h of the budget'pe rx last six months The remaining amount of the; amendment is the result of salary increases,; and revenue.sharing supported expendi tures for -code enforcement. of the total amendment required in:_tl 2,128,571 78,434 2,207,005 program, approximately $601 OW is O� Pub Safety essary to provide.foz increased cost: for personal services 9.ncluding'59.4� - for the payment of 'Overtime. Other;, - - increases for,fuel and repair and CITY OF IO`^•' C3TY 1974/75 BUDGET AMENDMENTS CITY- OF Iowa CITY 1974/75BUDGET `AMENDMENTS -MONTH ,_..: 18 -MONTH- .. - .APPROVED PROPOSED BUDGED - -. - - ._AMENDMENTS-. -AMENDED- _ „ COMMENT/EXPLANATION FUND/PROGRAM -BUDGET Enterprise: - -295,390 - 17,632- 313,022 This amendment.is required to +provide; is Parking. Revenue for transfers to the construction fund' - .`thatwere required over.andabove --those budgeted to complete the'Colle Street parkingfacility. 1,028,710 46,402 1,075,112 This amendment will provide for adds ... ' Sewer Revenue tional salaries and wages in.addition;. to $12,000 for a parking lot -improve-,_, went that was not budgeted, and.$1800 in additional repair and maintenance.; materials that were not budgeted. ' 2,267,305 135,007 2,402,312 This amendment is required as -'a -result --- Nater Rev.=nue 3,591,405 199,041' 9,790, 446 of the purchase $120. Subtotal - of water pipe ;for the -1974 and 7.975 ; -' Urban Renewal projects: Other, i.ncreas ro- in this activity are __necessary to pro- vide`for increased costs for repair ar vide for maintenance materials and salaries 628,703 18,855 647,558 This amendment is necessary to ad3us� Trust & Agency for increases in overall City salary-, _ levels and to provide for adjustments in the retirement schedule for Police' and Fire personnel. _-- _ CITY OF I0:7A CITY -I --- ---- -. - _ -1974/75_-BUDGET:. AMENDMENTS _ - 18 -MONTH 18 -MONTH .- -- - _ - - .APPROVED -:. PROPOSED - .. ': BUDGET - --:: -:• BUD -GET BU AMENDMENTS AMENDED.COMMENT/EXPLANATION FOND/PROGRAM 62,250 162,250 This amendment is necessary to , Special Assessment 100,000 - provide for the completion of. , $ 24;294,492-, $(7_;518;282) $16,7 76� paving and sewer assessment pro- over --.TOTALS. - grams which were carried -:into _ the 18 -month period from the previous budget. •', - -- NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ' The City Council Of Iowa City, Johnson County,'Iowa, will meet at the Civic Center, in the Council Chambers at -7:30 P.M. on June 24, 1975, for the purpose of 'amending the current Iowa City Budget adopted on October 2, 1973. Increases in expenditures proposed will be met'from increased receipts and from cash balances not.budgeted'or considered in the current budget. ` There will be no increase in taxes to be paid in 1974/75.. :. Taxpayers will be heard for or 'against the proposed amendment at the time and -place specified above. A -detailed statement of budget amendments are on file at the Department of Finance and City Clerk's Office in the Civic Center, and at the Public Library. Abbie stolfus City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. - -. RESOLUTION AMENDING: -THE -1974/75 BUDGET BE IT -REMEMBERED, on this, the 24th day Of June, 1975, the City Council of -Iowa -City, Iowa, of Johnson County, Iowa, met in session for`the-purpose on October - of hearing on an amendment:: to the `current 'operating budget adopted 2,-1973. '-Therewas-present aquorum as`required`by law_Thereupon ` according to found that the notice of time and .place ;of hearing was published considered law. Thereafter, and on'said date the amendment was taken up and and-taxpayersheard for or against the amendment as follows: -�. THEREAFTER,.and after hearing all taxpayers to, be heard, the Council - determined took up the amendment to the budget for final consideration and listed that said budget be corrected by changing the proposed expenditures as in the original budget, in thefollowingfunds: General: -.:.- Administration-- _ $ --- - .-:-Community .Development - _335,218- -77,988- Public Safety 78,434 Transportation- 391,292 Environmental Protection 108,545 -Leisure &.Cultural."Opportunities (53,656) Subtotal 937,821 Debt Service Capital Projects (8,790,249) Enterprise: Parking Revenue 17,632 - Sewer Revenue- 46,402 Water Revenue ` 135,007 -Subtotal- —199.041 Trust & Agency 18,855 Special Assessment - - 62,250 TOTAL - $(7,5282) The increase in expenditures set above will be met -from increased receipts There and from cash balances not budgeted or considered in the current budget. will be no increase in taxes to, be paid 1974/75. It was moved by and seconded by that the Resolution as read be adopted, and upon roll call there were: AYES: NAYS: - ABSENT: Brandt -'Czarnecki-" deProsse - Neuhauser Davidsen Passed and approved th1.a 24th day of Juno, 1975. -.. MAYOR _. ,.ATTEST: CITY CLERK i. _... . . IPI Mlamo to Parks and Recreation -Commission ; Date: aune`20, 1975 From: Rules Committee of the City Council Page: 3 - (Article IIi, Section 3 (Cont'd)) - Section 3. Vacancies. A vacancy in any office because of death, -resignation, removal, disqualification or other cause shall be Filled by the members for the unexpiredportion of term. _-- Section 4. Chair. TheChairshall, when present, 'preside at all ..meet- irigs of tIt, -members, appoint committees, call ,special meet- ings and in general perform all duties incident; to the office of a.Chair and such other duties as may be prescribed by the members from time ,to time. - Section 5. Vice -Chair: the absence of the Chair, or in the event of -.In death, inability or refusal to act, the Vice -Chair shall per- form the duties of the Chair and when so acting shall have all the powers of and be subject to all the restrictions upon the Chair. ARTICLE IV DUTIES --- Section 1. General. The Coranission shall perforin such duties as set forth in- Chapter -3.33.4'of the Iowa City City ,Cods. The Commission shall recommend and review policies. rules, - regulations, ordinances, and budgets relating to parrs playgrounds, recreational services, and cultural functions of the City of Io a City -and make such reports to the City -- Council as the Corrnission deems in the public inTe.est. The Co -,.mission is entitled to' receive `such staff assist- e and information as necessary in the performance of'its duties. The>Coirmission shall annually transmit to the City Council a ; " report of its activities and recommendations for the develop- ' ment, and operation of parks, recreational centers, playgrounds," and cultural -facilities and programs. Section 2. Choitel Improvements Budget. Eachyearat least 30 days prior --- --_- to the start -of the CIP budget -review process by the City Council, the Commission_ shall submit to the Council its recon-` mendations for 'capital improvements relative to parks, play- grounds, recreation centers and cultural functions and �a-1 ties. Such recommendations shall be or at least a file year °- period into the future, shall list items and estimated -costs. Section 3. 'Operating audget. Each year at least 30 days prior to the Start - o the process of reviewing the _operating budget, the Commission hall suinai 1. to Elle, R I Ly Count, i l 'i is rncor.mendations relative to the operating budget. Suctr recon rtindations' n !ed not d.tafl the a ounts, but rather should recommend budget -priorities and' dirr_ctionc of change frcra prior budgets: tA I Rules Committee Minutes -,June • u 20 -1975 ' The Rules Committee met on June 20,'1975, to discuss certain matters relating to all Boards and Commissions._ The Rules Committee recommends the following :items: l) Boards and Commissions should use an identical format for minutes. The -following is recommended: a. -Members present. b. :Members absent. c. Staff present. - d. Recommendations to the City Council. e. -Request s<to the City Manager for information and staff assistance. f. -,List of matters -'pending Commission -Council disposition. g. Summary of discussion and formal action(s) taken. 2). Items recommended to the City Council by Boards and Commissions_should.be listed.as-separate agenda items to distinguish them from the formal receipt • and filing of minutes--.--------- inutes. _3). 3)., Recommendations from Boards and Commissions should be accompanied by the appropriate staff report(s). Information pertaining to any alternatives that were considered -and the rationale for the recommendation should be ,included where appropriate.' 4). When items, come to the City Council for which there is a designated Board or Commission those items should be referred ,to that Board or Commission for consideration and report or comment to the City Council.- RULES COMMITTEE Carol W. deProsse Penny K.`-Davidsen • E r, - : •-�inaf:-.r cJli :i Lit I _.:t/ oL :� `I st p^ �. J ,� - 1I , • - Yr,tlt;.l;1, i_t._ _tv_ Gal13u v of O1 Inc: `''�C:J. iCI C�Ct ap.lCOVi11,, l 010:77 "rl n t 'it" O1 lOSv;1 Gt lJ ,-a'i. dit103 J--iP G 1 --- _. atl 'lots L'1 LO.. o / 1 til.. J :t 1111 II.J O'1 _. / y-_- .•-, . t'l9 tt]1t :R sr -11.1 SUt3-11Vl7i01, t'dt C •lt_inS s 11 h s r•_. (:� ti ._, JL Ir a5t-t vent '0I.Lht feet in width and Portland , .card �J:ty, C Z ,l^ �t.� CL:C) <[k.I _fu, .r, -OC LOI�Ca C,UCtJ.>_ dS S[Jc^CLttE'. Cl ll jr tii _ to Ii in accorut nG ':1Lt'tL the Dla ns all l >O C LGu r10 nS 1 :7 _ ne r o -la C 1 'o d, - and u _far dsec foto of the City r I F:. a _ :J 0. tat-`LCti par:. he /.ac e,s - that no building p''Cr11t. F 1i O_'.a^% 10C..Ln 3a id.SUJCI i'Jis LOR CCwe er,-by this ayCc^meat Until 111 OL_Si!L_i "li "..CJV�r"-•.^:.S-, `:1 irn _he Cx.Ce0iiOn. of s1dCWt1e..sna111?lVd bf£'R GO,1^a1-C1 '^. Cl, ^.mil n /C 172aP ::J03Lt?d-.in escrow With -tile City Cl ..G -of to*.Vii 'City. -• -. 1G:ia ari a:nou n., ecival to the cost Of said unCO:aple ted-.i-norotizlII Pis any teR.�1Q� P_a reo in Jhicn case a_buildin9 permit shall be ls�u2d for any tot so the DarC/ of the first_Part, its g"'Rt-^_E.'3, aSS1CJ RE2S, 3:1C1 SUCC'�'SSUrS 1=c__C�St, F.=Cabe agree that ,cub11C services, including but not timit?d t0, SCC2@t mainta._ance, s;,ow and ice rCMjval,-rubbishl refuse, and is O?12 0011 tl0 t, t•_ c:<_c^nd C{[ to said subdivision until the Street pa de,T.ent is COMP'2_'' Jt11 PO b Of and by City Ot City, os,a. - jhe PaCty.UL the -first Gdit-further agrcf'.i that it..Will, within one year ir0 t e Ca _a anyr house is GORs`: ur'ted on any lot, install a SIC: 'Nae- l.pOR the c S t;2 S OC ;/c 1�'%J. 13 dbllCii. y i:: la to,, -which ifle_.`jal,- S is 11 b -a at' 1e35t t0 'C G1 -y 8t. .•1,Ie �Pd`COnsi CCCtC`t dGCCrding to the PIP-nS and S pec LL Lc.^. CfUnS. Ci t - _- . City Io�rla, 8nd unr . ;h`:! direction Of the City-Frigine- in i1 event Qi Iowa.- . the D?Cz'J O* t1� forst part snoui tall to install.;a11 ide /Jif: G^ 1 to install oto^ii^_d, trie pa. -J o t: a s_.o ._. aa: at its option, pros tO-Cr �=1 rte of tho- Fir.`- Pact or ih: o J ;?r r'` such Sa 1'. S;. - t, _t c_ti �1 C tVI-tP 7Rt _-[ c psi -Pa t ne-eO l06 �'CL .JRLC R.3 lLDu '? [las Ce = : co ristructed, and n".]Dn h?' Ot the t= % _ , Y `112C8Ui -OC the Darty Oa .the second aCJ;�BS CCY:1' 1: Will pay 'he Cc.F'JO:^J D1=:_COS_ t 't1R12 any jOC l9 CORVejeC1 -7y ..•� t.. lt5 OpC1UR, ,.ay dem r'Ia PCi C:: C[U li" art .^ d^:po>ittgith they City Of 10 City, the party o1 'he fi st part , car J that _. _CUal to the Coat o_-corlstruG LnCJ:sa td,SUjetJa llcs a:-, -_-_n _'. .. L_: }:Sine=r, DlUS tiVeR.:-LL -Live (??) P'•rcet^.t 01 SIICil Costs.1'i:6 t-.-.' n! LS i0 a ._!�j j;� CLOW by the CILy to b Seel fOr the cons tr-uC ClOfl'Of tR� n1d IVa i?.v :rovided, such constructlon,to be made by such mer.i.ot. and oro-edurE of the s?cor.j p=1rt'c-ay :3:lterm[ne without refe,-ence to •pecial DiOC2t!UCe for 12._i"t of cone -a Cts. Any Surfs re lal'1 ' g -aft^; 1i:5- .� F CO_.S_ _nn Oct iCi... s!dCtVa lk. frC:H said F C'O'a -shall be Cetu C -T tO It ,..'•.i% O. -.Ch:_i.-.. L :;•'. Ct or Li. asslrinee S. O:' SUGCES SOCS.iR,lnte eta C, OL the D.Ct%.Ot ti.8:: 391 +Lt tray, nt ita optioa, inst,111 said sidewalk according Co Cilah,lis r F rh^ 197' Godo or Ia:va art,, if the party of the s c:a 1 pa._ .1 .. J �Pr alt', be made by th1 f^etho I tihn , tP.Lt " L_yt Carty the t the Oroc_dur 1 ' coj I_•r2b r x(r =d nJ _ - r G' tG , it tLJ.^. ^•, _-h Con_t.lcti O'1 11 eel ROC (°12Ct the. P lie. .lanes O;I rP')l r. Ur iOwa,, : ;ia 1iLC .1s PCOvIcled J Lh°' spoGlal a95_o_ IT �. t lal.> _ -. -- < pnd tar' as t0 tl _ ? .'1 'nC U` a'•S .JS he r' :'ty Ct til v .0 - - t i.�. n{I sO t. .S to t_s.,3_I r'tf-1 ,._C4 Ja /ay . Lha J') S LR LR to v a n-:.-y� S vJ _' 1 or a iLlcr to Go S IU4t Rc' J�+ i' RL-G( CUIJ ) C_,!ih . O .� ^`C.'07J; C. Q''o Jt^2:.(, tR:: S_cond P,1fty C..ay O.occed LO Go .S_CU.._ -' is C the t'-en v/' lout notice, t0'l1:..:Pl tf O the Firs , •- I >_ .::L'I tiT i..5'L- ,il IL/.Ti2ICbyr a-�C c 5 f..:dL It LVi{� pay Oi. "-)rte S-co RG 11.E 07 IJT, .)! �JJ �.J1 O 1 .:JLr U LZ '.J _. 5L Ja' r^ fi OC G1 J LC( gutter. or Lnn (1..'C1C:!7/ i Code Of I., /J, acid ii ni:. CKOnCT,iiJCl1C` f2L t;•a v L .a .iv_ should be-aladL:-11Y-this IVE2 - - t- 'of S'L:h COR- LICLIOn reed:: O meet -h--C2 1 L :.2 (1t5 U_ nolicei ^ 'r.-D2^c'LitS..O. Vc.1112 dS provided by thE. 57vC vl OE'oc_S �.v 1 1V 5 'v' CriiinaLion of LhL S Co[iLL i JILT ds LO -%e aSoe53- L L Com`/il:c L, - Dn -y ,-)L IiL al and rot suoicL o 7.-a ,; f`y O R°' Sf: COP.Ci._-P`?'t that Tl!'n 01L Cf the (vuLi LCe 6nt:iUC ^'Va 7"''? Satib •CtiO , oL the City oi-IOG/ct -C V IOWcf, -i b, _.� _7 =iOn.UL ti?e side-Wal," L La:Val - C2Gl1iI" aLits, L_ v'•ili Clue 11 the r)L 1C tv •l1` .COlFaCo. ��=:,"--JJCLRSOiI C,oURty, Iowa, a y00U and Sufficient _Ct..a S8 OL (ne - a�6J9 S'1OClt'/LS LOny-0I of t�Lc^c-varimis lots therein, lfo^ the recluLcernents Set out agreement and its .CECIULCc fv..::CLCS Will Rot. constitute a Ci011j ' r'OR v._2 LiLI_ Lo 11-3 l0 is in u^.is s•1Jt{iV LSLOn, r _ -.ov/a City Tonnson County, 10 June this2•lthaay+ ci DATED L.- � Juno 1975. 50.11:=LAR BROS. CONST2,TJCTIO�: CI:Y ()I, IOWA CtTY, i0`+` 37 . t -� naf ^ •-ti�C PC '31L(.�RL I•.••- us, city Stolt �- C-' L i E! _-c:v._a lC ., L'_l ia'Z1 S..�+LnCICC J�-Cv _.a CJ .n•ry+ -T F: F.'-IRST PART -T'+`+i:TY 0" 1�i:: SECOND P.• .3i 1':. (. L U curt 1975 D ABBIE S701_FUS c{rf Cot _ RESOLUTION N0. 75-199 RESOLUTION' ORDERING CONSTRUCTION, APPROVING PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND FORM OF CONTRACT AND NOTICE TO BIDDERS, FIXING AMOUNT OF BIDDER'S CHECK, AND ORDERING CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH NOTICE. TOVING SAME, BIDDERS AND FIXING A DATE FOR RECSpECIFICATIONS AND FORM FOR A PUBLIC HEARING ON PLANS, OF CONTRACT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF 10WA CITY, 0WA: That the construction of Libraryand Recreation Roof Repair Project is ,hereby ordered to be constructed• plans and specifications as - BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the detailed p prepared by ---Cit En ineer Geor a Bonnettan Recreation Roo - Ly racy Iowa,.and the form of - forthe construction of said for the City of _Iowa City. Attorney, be and the- Re air Pro ect --by the City contract and Notice to Bidder_, as prepared laced on file in the office same areherebyapproved, and are ,hereby ordered p of the 'City Clerk for public inspection. that the amount of the -check to accompany each bid 000, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED,R� bcx� x xx in the amount of $7 , shall beX�xxx� Cit of Iowa City y;;Treasurer, Y payable to the Cit that the City Clerk-is_hereby directed to adver- BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, rovements, bids for be .received Council of he City of Iowa City,_ tise for bids :for the 'construction a City imp Of `Julyt . _,1975 and b the City Manager in behalf of the City resided over by, him Iowa, up to 10:00 o'clock A.M. on the 17th day to be.p to be opened by the, City Manager at public meeting Civic Center, upon said to that time, and thereupon referred to the City Council for action upon said ly]5 at 7 0 0 clock P.M. Notice bids ata meeting to be held at the Council Chambers, Iowa, on the 22 once Juy' English al newspaper, printed wholly-in the to Bidders istobe ,published once-each week for two consecutive weeks in the'Iowa City-Press-Citizen, a`leg Manager said bid language, the first publication to be'not less than fifteen clear days prior In the absence of the Cower has been to the date fixed for said lany cit official to whom such p opening may be conducted by Y Y _ delegated by Ordinance. on the °- ublic hearing s ecifications and form of contract BE LT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the-Council hold a p matter of the adoption of proposed plans, p improvements, Which documents are-noacen last abovin e e for the making of said imp 7:30 0' clockP M. , CDT office of the City Clerk, said hearing to beheld at the p July;19L5—,at mentioned on'the--15th day of ��—b ablication once in a give notice of said hearing Y p at least ten andthatthe _City-Clerk g' in the English language, local legal newspaper, printed wholly clear days prior to the date fixed therefor- that Davidsen and seconded., by Neuhauser` It was moved by p on roll call there were' the resolution as read be ado ted and up A=1 A-2 v So lin. ft. R.C.P. 2000D Storm Sewer (12" Diam)` rsy lin. ft. R.C.P. 2000D Storm Sewer (15"-Diam) GY lin. ft. R.C.P. 2000D Storm Sewer- (18" Diam) 4 Gc• _ lin. {t. R.C.P. 2000D Storm Sewer (21" Diam) ,[ r lin. ft. R.C.P. 2000D Storm Sewer (2A" Diam) , Q Z4 lin. ft. R.C.P. 2000D Storm Sewer' (30" Diam) i F- 33 lin. ft. R.C.P.' 2000D Storm Sewer (36"-Diam), :- ti. Z3 each Private Storm -Sewer -Hookup to. Main Z 0 lin. ft. - -Privatc Storm Sewer Pipe y each Standard Precast Manhole(115")- 3 each &ecial 1, eSru����✓ Pte« ,r r� </� (co )'G° y each RA -3 Inlet each RA -5 Inlet r 0 each RA -8 -Inlet 50 lin. ft. RA -8 Inlet _Throat; ; 4 each Grate .Type Inlet i9 Z s sq. ft. 7"-P.C. Structural -'Concrete (Top for Sidewalk Vaults) 435 cu. ft. P.C. Structural Concrete (Vertical Support for Sidewalk. Vaults) 6_1 sq. ft. Concrete Block 14a11 2 each Manhole Frame F, Lid for Sidewalk Vault -(Neenah R-1914 with Wrench _ or Equivalent) >v each Exterior Door for Sidewalk Vault (Bilco`.Type AD or -Equivalent)' _. sq. ft. Water -Proof Membrane - E zvo lbs. Structural Steel lin. ft. Galvanized Steel Conduit (3") a -yy lin-ft. Galvanized Steel Conduit. (2") ae lin. ft. Galvanized Steel Conduit Pushed (2")_ Il,� i`L each Concrete Foundation - Traffic` Signal i 3 each ConcreteFoundation- Controller Z ' each Concrete Foundation - Light Pole 5 L each - Pull Box ` r -r Lon, Class B Crushed Stone cu. ,yd S. ExcavaLi.on _. A-2 • •. 3z ft. Saw Cut 15''y F w sq. yds. - Pavement Removal E i. - Concrete Driveway Removal sq. yds. sq. ft. Sidewalk-Renoval ft. P.C.C.- Step _Rcmoval >r, sq. } ft, Structural Concrete Removal I sq: Z '1 Z. 0 - S Manhole Removal i each each Manhole Adjustment each Inlet Removal "f j9 iv each Pull Box Removal [ each Foundation Removal - Light Pole S Z.f each Foundation Removal - Traffic io ..Signal / each Foundation Removal - Control { � Pedestal i l s each Remove F,ave SLight Pole & Bracket ! � z All work is to be done in strict compliance with the plans and P.E. City Engineer, f specifications prepared by George R. Bonnett, ity heretofore been approved by the City-the -of-Iowa:.-City,;,Iowa, which have for in the'Office of the r Council, and are on file public:examination City Clerk: Wherever reference is made to the specification in the plans or to include the "Standard I contract proposal, it shall be understood on Primary, Farm to Market, and Specifications for Construction Work on the Primary Road System", SecondaryRoads and -Maintenance Commission. Series* of 1972, Iowa State Highway S Each proposal shall be made on a form furnished by the, City on, certified by, an- and must be accompanied by a check drawn and and envelope separate from the one con- Iowa Bank and -filed in ,a scaled --- in the amount of X50,000.00 made payable taining the proposal, and the City of Iowa;City,;Iowa , and may be to. the City Treasurer of the City of Iowa City, Iowa, as liquidated cashed.by the Treasurer, of the the successful bidder fails to enter into a damages in event contract within ten (1.0) days and post bond satisfactory to the City Checks of the insuring the faithful performance of the `contract. retained fora period o£ not to. ,.F, losest two or more bidders may be fifteen (15) days until a contract is awarded or rejection' 11t exceed Other checks will be returned after the ,canvass and tabulation made. bids is completed and reported to the City Council - of !_i Pwillbe-made in cash from such funds -Payment to the Contractor O190h 3 City that may be'legally used for such pure�centses o:( ) of the } _the of monthly 'esti mates in amounts equal to ninety'p F work accomplished as outlined in ".'Method of Payment". By virtue of statutory authority; ��refercricc will TIC �� van tc, within the ,State of i products and provisions grown and coal produced be to Iowa domestic labor in the Iowa, and preference will ,given -° A-3— ■ construction of the improvement. The st;ccessfttl bidder will be required to furnish a bond in an amount equal to one hundred percent (100 a) -o£ the roved-ontraby hect cCity said ;bond to be issued -by a responsible ayment Ourety fpall materials and Council and shall guarantee the promp` payment i and shall also }, "'labor and protect and =save harmless the City from claims and damages of any kind caused by the operation of the contract.eriod of five (5) guarantee the maintenance of the improvement fora p tion and acceptance by the City. years from and after its comple proposed con The work under the tract will be commenced within signing of the contract and shall be seven (7) days after completed November 1, 1975. Time is an essential element of the contract. L00.00)tJill be damages in the -amount of two hundred dollars ($200.00) ' damages in accordance -with -'-'Base Specifications" Article 1108.08 for each calendar day required for project completion after the above designated; date.-`: 'plans and specifications governing the construction of the The proposed improvements have been prepared by George R. ficaBonnett, P.E. City Engineer of Iowa City,-Iotaa;which plans and specifications, also :prior proceedings of the City Council referring ,to and defining said proposed improvements are'hereby made a part o£ this notice by reference and the proposed contract ---shall be executed in_compli- ance therewith. _ The plans, tile and proposed contractdocumentso f may be examined at tho Office of the City ropTosal blanks maytbe secured plans and specifications and ,form of proposal City Engineer of. t at theOfficeo£ George R,Iionnett, P.E•on a ment of twenty-five` , Iowa --to Iowa, by bona fide bidders up P•Y provided dollars sand spwhich will ecificationsturnable to the city Engineer's the plans and sp days after the +' office in good condition within fifteen (15) Y � opening of b ds . ; •. ect an or all proposals and The, City reserves the right to rej y` to waive -technicalities and irregularities. wa City, Iowa. Published upon order of the City Council of Io / S '. -.`A le Stol u5. aOna s City ('1t -Clerk of IOWa Y, 1 w i - n -a C-01 C-02 • ESTMA: UNIT EXTENDED UNITtLiC AIWITY PRICE AA)UN-f ITEM DES_CRIPTIw 300 $ 1.00 $ ;nn on 12. -Primer or Tack Coat gal 13. R.C.P. 2000D Storm Sewer lin ft 450 12.00 5.400.00 (12" Dian) 14. R.C.P. 2000D Storm Serer lin £t 154 13.00 2,002.00 - (15" Diam) 15. R.C.P.'2000D Storn Sewer lin ft 64 -14.00 896.00 (18" Diam) 16. R.C.P. 2000D Storm Sewer lin ft 366 - 18.00 -_ 6 588.00 (2111 Diam) -`- 17. -R.C.P. 2000D Storm Sewerlin ft 409 18.50 7,566.50 (24" Dian) 18. R.C.P. 2000D Store Sewer lin £t 424 48.00 20 352.00 (S0" Diam) 19. R.C.P: 2000D'Storn Sewer lin ft 336- 50.00-, 16,800.00 (36" Diam) 20. Private Storm Sewer Hookup each 23 50.00` 1,150.00 to main - lin ft 202 10.00 - 2,020.00 21. Private Storm Sewer Pipe 4 -57S.00 - 2,300.00 22. - :Standard Precast Alanhole C48") each 3 ;.950.00 '- 2;850.00 23. Standard Precast ,f,uihole (60") each _ 750.00 3,000.00 - each 4 24. RA -3 Inlet - 1 950.00 950.00 each 25. RA -5 Inlet 10 990:00 9,9�- each 26. RA -8 Inlet 90 50:00' 4,500.00 27. RA -8 Inlet Throat lin ft 4 600.00 2,400.00 28._ Grate Type Inlet each 2g, 7" P.C. Structural Concrete ft 1,925 15.50 29,537.50 _(Top; for Sidewalk Vaults) sq 30. P.C. Structural Concrete -- (Vertical Support for ft 438 15.50 6,789.00 Sidewalk Vaults) _ cu 4.00 216.00 31. Concrete'Block 11a11 sq ft 54 32, Manhole Frame $ Lid for Sidewalk Vault (,Neenah R-1919 Z - 281.00 - 562.00 with wrench or'Equivalent) - each 33. Exterior Door £or Sidewalk 8,200.00 Vault (Bilco Type each 10 820.00 - ---- Equivalent) 1.00 2,118.00 34, - Water Proof Membrane sq ft 2,118 .35 -259. CO ' 35. Structural Steel lbs ft 740 1,616 5.40 8,726.40 36. Galvan:i.zcd-Stcel Conduit (3") lin C-02 Resolution No. 75-202- It was 'moved- by Davidsen and seconded by. Neuhauser that the Resolution as read be adopted, and upon roll call there were: AYES:NAYS: ABSENT: X Brandt X -Czarnecki X Davidsen X - deProsse X Neuhauser Passed and approved this 24th day of June 1975 may ATTEST: City Clerk-- NO. RESOLUTION RESOLUTION ORDERING CONSTRUCTION, APPROV2`' PLANS, =-`SPECIFICATIONS AND FORM OF CONTRACT AND NOTICE TO _ = BIDDERS, FIXING AMOUNT OFBIDDER'S CHECK, AND TO BIDDERS ORDERING CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH NOTICE AND FOR A AND FIXING A DATE -FOR -RECEIVING SAME, SPECIFICATIONS AND FORM IC HEARING ON PLANS, OF CONTRACT BE ITRESOLVEDBY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF IOWA CITY, IOWA: construction of 1975 As phalt overlay Program That the I is.hereby ordered to be constructed. -- �- - - - FURTHER RESOLVED that the detailed plans and specifications as BE IT prepared by George Bonnett City1975 neer halt Overla Pro ram for the construction of; said and the form of -for the City of Iowa City; Iowa, prepared by the City Attorney Notice to Bidders; as , be and the: file in the office contract and are hereby approved, and are hereby ordered placed on same of the City Clerk for .public inspection. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the amount of the check In theemamoy each cof 1$10, 000, - shall -.be}{}[t7®CXXXX)RX}X4[c}4�ARRxRft7a�P7G�3RbaXb� City of--Iowa.City. to the City` Treasurer,to adver- City Clerk is hereby directed payable BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the bids to bereceived tise for bids for the construction of said improvements, _ Council of City of Iowa City, by the City Manager in behalf;-of the City The the _IjUday of -Iowa, up to 10:00 o'clock AM. on ed over.by him at upon said to-be-opened,-byandhthereu onnager referredatoUthecCitytCouncilbforractesiion at that time, P Iowa Cit Council Chambers,- Cio'cI y ckt_M. `Notice bids ata meeting to be at the 7n1y 197x, at ].30 _ Iowa, on the 2�l$e of in 'once week for two to ,Bidders is to'be published each English p rintednwhollyvin thes p the Iowa City Pres legal newspaper; less than fifteen clear days prior -language, the first publication to be-not In the absence of the City. Manager said bid to the date fixed for said letting. to whom such power has; been opening may be conducted by any city official delegated by Ordinance. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Council hold a public hearing on the form contract matter of the adoption of proposed plans, specifications and on fillee in the for the making of said improvements, which documents are now , atthe 3place office of the City Clerk, said hearing to be197_5, ao?clock P MVeCDT -'Tn1— mentioned on the 15tkiday of g publication once in a -said-hearin by P,- and -that the,:. City: Clerk give noticeof _.- at-.least ten printed wholly in the English -language, local legal newspaper, the date fixed therefor. clear days prior to d by Brandt and seconded by Davidsen t`•at - it was move the resolution as read be adopted and upon roll call there were: crnri: itoiry or• t84� • • TROT i & JANSEN • AT(OFINLYS_AT UN __ s B South Linn Street -- taaa CH -1, io:.a 5::Z•;0 9_South Linn = Iowa; City, Iowa 52,240 June 18,;1975 -Iowa Board of Regents % Mr:R.Wayne Richay, Executive Secretary Grimes State Office Building' Des NAines, Iowa 50319 Dear Board (Members: 'We are Iowa City residents responding to and acting in the interests of residents across Iav+a'who have expressed concern about -the preservation ofthe First Presbyterian Church, a`Hational Register historic site. We respectfully request permission to appear before the Board at your meeting June 24-26 to discuss the_following_points: 1. The economic feasibility of maintaining the property. We have _knot•Fledge of conflicting analyses regarding ,th-costs involved. 2. The responsibilities of theownerof a Mational Register historic. site. While thebuilding ontheproperty is historic and should be preserved, :it_need not necessarily. be restored as a museu;. building. 3. The viability of a specific proposal for_the use of the prcperty.,'Sie have knowledge of one proposal which could,be feasible on a lease or sale basis and which would result in an appropriate use for the -property. 4. The University's proposal for the use of the property as a cleared site.: We understand that the University has no immediate need or proposed use for the building or the property. Should you grant us this opportunity to discuss these points with you, we are_ confident that we can address reservations which you as. the guardian of the property nay have had. Further, we feel that there is sufficient interest in the preservation of the building toencouragediscussion of an adaptive use for it. We have reason to believe that we speak for all those who hold interest in this architecturally and historically significant resourse, the preservation of which would certainly be tim_ly on the eve of our nation's Bicentennial ;and in _these times of concern over conservation of Materials and anergy. A copy of this letter is being sent to the chairpersons of the local Johnson County Historical Society, The Johnson County Bicentennial Commission, the State Historical Board of the Iowa State Historical'Department, the Director of the Division of Historic Preservation,, the Iowa City Council, the Association of Campus Ministers, and others. If our request for a hearing is granted, we will he prepared to discuss our concerns before you, with selected individuals from sorw_ of these concerned groups. Respectfully yours, Emil Trott and PobertV. Jensen p rye', • .. x. �:_�... . ^r•s Y J - ., -. UTTEF )our I• ,raTcnls7-r � _.. .. EDocwnoa, Chairman , 130\ N\i6\T { TIRCnf)-t'ilftl Di,f ctrl �, .. - STATF: _. ,\rrnornunoN's untie AUDn, tis Ik,< Vol �[)011�¢ Of log. -r clairman XORTII LII31i13TY, 10\\'\ 52717 _ STATE: Or IOWA - - PnosF:: (919) 13213-25111 - Sixly-Sixth Gencrell Asacnil,h - - ars 1110ilIC5, 310113n 50319 June 18, 1975 Mr. Edgar Czarnecke, Mayor 230 Windsor Drive Iowa City, IA 52240 Dear Ed: _ With the passage of House File 903 by both houses last $264,070 from week, the city of Iowa City is set to, receive through its municipal assistance fund. We the state of Iowa more money into the fund this were able to pump substantially ever before,, and I certainly believe that the year than ---additional funds will prove most helpful to you. If I can ever be of assistance to you, please let me know. Reg - s, ohn E. Patchett State Representative JEP/nmp RESOLUTION ISSUING CIGARETTE PERMITS (CONTINUED) June 24, 1975 RESOLUTION NO. 7s-203- FA PARTMENT OF UNI' it ELOPN , 2 19 7 r by , ?LS ^, D, rec or o. �^� r'UD o ,Ice..in Omaha, 7, n ❑.!e.,nesday, Jo ne ?S, 10,• a _ iu 00 AM `'to i f'ayor Edgar Cza n_c%i ,a From Presia=nz Ford cor.cernir; ;,e I ' i Housin(<.,td i n Inity Development Grant. i i i , , d ! i th^ United States, Sheboygan, 'rlisconsin, that has a population greater han Iowa City that is not eligible for the approximately 75 subsidization. None of io near Iowa City's cities and counties on this list has a density rat. perhaps that of other cities, is that we have be Our basic argument and, en very generously granted capital subsidies for new buses, but we are extremely low fares tight pressed to meet operating costs. Because of a combination of support of the citizens who are and increasing ecological concerns, we generated interested in utilizing mass transit. The impact on the parking system has been declined since the inauguration of the city remarkable. Parking revenues have it is estimated that about one half of the new patrons to operated system and thesystemfo erly drove their automobiles. As indicated earlier, the first year subsidy to the the -City. --- system was taken out Of the general taxing power of the City. Iowa cities are restricted by the State>Legislature to spend no more than asses is for total general operations of the city. Currently in Iowa City, mill assessment rozimately 5300,000 is more equates to about 590,000 in taxes. A deficit of app budoe� he city has than 3 mills or greater than lOX of our existing operating federal subsidies. two other sources from which to secure funds in addition to any One being the option to raise fares. The other is a special allocation of an p bus additional 2 mill levy which can be assessed tato Thp �aaltiona�'�t xpayers oper ax The Council has strenuously refected these two alternatives burden would be met with resistance by many citizens who are now burdened :.+iii arm - excessively high property taxes as we all know- The 15� fare rias h -_n - y p ant in attracting what is called in the industry choice iders;caDflit werzrir re - those that have no other choice but to continue using the r^� +L creased to say -o leave The a 25¢• ttempt, however, is to convince enough r= P lternative source of transportation their car at home and use the transit as an a 1St fare .is most inducive to making that shits in Yransporta- and we feel that the -tion mode. �5) In 1973,' the Council was faced with the increasing deficit. About ,this time,, federal_ general revenue sharing %-Is available. The Council strongly de- bated the feasibility of using the new federal money to make up a transit deficit. Although fiscal authorities within the city argued strenuously that it was unsound economic policy to use revenue sharing funds to meet reoccurring operating expenses, the Council reluctantly allocated these funds. This past year urban again the e two `options of increasing taxes and raising fares-was question came up, tti cil tentatively voted to increase fares to 25t, again raised and, in fact; the Coun municipal assistance program. Prior to this subject to an increase in the state yzar, the State of Iowa allocated`4 million dollars for municipal assistance o ali the cities and owns in Iowa. This amounted to approximately $90,000 to the city of Iowa City, or about 1 mill. The Legislature in this session has proposed e to 12 million dollars. This will enable_us to an increase in municipal assistanc continue our farts of 15.t, at least for the irmediate future. r+e'need an additional source of financing to The problem obviously is that continue to meet the demand of ever increasing costs. `Even though Iowa City does not suffer so severe a financial plight as nost American municipalities, especially have sufficient funds to use for the larger comunities in our Nation, it does not rr risk capital to play an active and innovative role in transit. The City coulu in- iceconstructing bus shelters, crease patronage by extending the level of serv, 11 developing a program to market transit (which we have not dont so far), incrzas ng pal costs to reduce the number of cars in the downtown area, and intzgra_tin9 a -- the transit system ',+ith a campus shuttle system to improve distribution. However, the increased revenues would not cover the increased costs, and thereforetill , s more subsidy would be necessary. In sutrmary`there's no question that Iowa City has an extremely viable transit n ridership since the c3 `y System as measured by the three-fold increase i n of a private firm in September 1971. Yetevenwithis th tr over the operatioemen- (�J . OPENDIX A - Page 1 MASS TRANSIT -- IO'WA CITY; IOWA 41. ;1971 UMTA Grant; Project ..IA -03-0004. Totdl unaudited project expenditures were 5585,192. UNTA changed -the original funding from 50:50% to 2/3:1/3 in August 1973. 'Purchase was—of-12—buses, repair equipment, facilities and land with remodeling of existing facilities. Iowa City's share of $195,064.15 was obtained from Liquor Profits funds. Note detailed schedule of expenditures='` "2. 1972 Purchase of Buses. ._ One used bus -rias purchased.from the Ottumwa Transit Lines for $1,534.00. Vehicle was -charged against operating funds. °3.— 1974 Purchase of Buses. - Purchase of two buses was financed throughGeneral Revenue Sharing funds. Total cost of vehicles was $87;454.28.' - "a;__Vehicle Lease; Ottumwa Transit -Lines, Inc. Year "Buses "Months Amount* - 1972 4 3 $6,000. 1973 4 3 6,000. ' 1974--- 4 3 6,000. 1975 3 4 6,000. - - " This arnount does not include maintenance performed on the vehicles nor major repair, completed while in Iowa City Service. • - Page 2 APPENDIX A 1971 UMTA CAPTIAL GRANT EXPENDITURES AMOUNT AMOUNT COST CATEGORY ACCT. # - BUDGETED EXPENDED 1. Purchase of Buses 10.01.05 $408,335 $408,334 2. Purchase of Fare Boxes -- 10:02.04 2,407 2,406 3. Purchase of Service Truck 10.03.01 2,617 - 2,616' 4. Purchase of Repair Equip. 10.03.02 28,377 19,541 'S. Purchase of Spare Engine 10.03.04 6,758 - 6,757 6. Land and Real Property 10.06.00 110,138 110,138 -7. Engineering Service 70:08.01 3,000 3,000 B. improvement to Property 10.12.00 32,400 32,400 9. Relocation Expense 31.00.00 2,500 -- 10. Contingency 32.00.00 4,016 TOTAL $600,548 $585,192 - o el 11 X r n _�_ a O 0 n ci.00•v,^•, C -. � r �• r3+. H N 7 W.a 0 rt H.,> A 3 _ Y•. cr. 0, w �, - H'O•t.']..'p, In 7 C t� .W IOiI ^ n n.H: _ r.v 0 ca '�... W. w HO w -_� :r 'r1 -`< :1, GQ N to 0 03 rt a:� rt 1, C.:]=^N.-O n -i-woo -0 _ H rt -.:.0 0 N H-r -.. W .-. '��._� - q. rD p _ �. O.0 a ty rpt C-) r'.N - H --- C p-. tn to 0 p w 0% 7 _ 1 H -V N N Com. R r; v O 3..7 - U, -v - - v b ^ ^ 0- s R.0 -w Ob _.. 0 ra 0 CD H.7.G Ip.A rxa:R 1 0 o m<'ya 0CDO n ., p 0 to y. O W Acn W....rt rt O y 7 W.E - - CG 7 O 7 7 0 `G to M R. n w - v+ .61CA. 9 n y, R•b H mCD t' `w p.:-.rON p.: A 10 pGworO -�. V-r. O H •rf to % rr,• O r 1. _.. J r-• X1.7 M - - O W W - `Q 1G O„• .j O --pw9 r H _:.- l0 pt- • Go - F-•" 1 _ J ? w W _. - !O Vl. to O u�.> 4 N G. _ 0 - - W. '. O, •• , 7. O O to r . A fA r r0 r N W W W u•+ > CT O rt 0 . , m w _ w G ROcF.•H 0' rJO 3 3 •• A �• O W - ..+ .:. Y. H . fl 7 y._.0 w W 0 H w- p fd W _ ;: tp -. J W O W C O P r •.. .. -. t•• 3 O J R-7 0 In R ? J W O y.7 ,. v- ,: L'. ~O R R - O 1 A r J P Y N ttDto w L'3 :- :.7 ..-. fit cr o -. W P � ::I. to L" W � f) CW ` Ln co A W O J N r - ... pt M O:0 Vl '. w W C to .G R ""do f... O -. to f0 W 4► .� K 3.-ri to G P ^ p 0 ~ ,. N N W> b N �.. 'I., .1 f L4 Ul a, w-O N-.. :.0 _ C- ❑. C) Vt _ N (Y R- r. - trl. t0 OD - _ - t0 O.O W J_. N to to w - - - O C7% - rt _ - _ 1•-' > ��R ,..0 CD -.. L4 to -._ pl U O C C• -' .. �-A. to v to Or - J O ,� r3 O N O us A' IN - r cc U3 tl C7, Ln C13 rn - 6 O O ✓ dp tr 0 �I • Z q.0 A.. N • O 03 _. r r ?O - rW G1 y N L O • ` APPENDIX:C COU,YfY STATE CowryMUOR CITY CITY pOpULATION ' Ne1�1 POPULATION - iA. 7s ozs ` cry FL � 75,283 Panama City_ 30,916 30, -. Pary ..: NIV Anmsu•onl; { Uric - 11A. 011 I. 75,590 75,909 Sandusky 32 168 , Gregg` TX - 75,929- Long View 44,397 Terre --Bonne - LA WA 76,049 76,894 -- Olympia 22,493 Thurston Scioto Oli 76,951` Portsmouth 28,045 12;148 Tompkins NY 77,064 Ithica 'hukarawas „ OH 77,211 - Morgan AL NY 77,306 77,439 Auburn 34 319 , Cayuga -Sussex NJ 77,528 Shasta Muskingum CA C1I 779640 77,826Hard Zanesville 32,426 -78,421 Ontario NY IN 78,849 79,109 Richmond 43,800 Wayne; Sumter SC 79,425 ' Indiana PA 1,10 79,451 79,852 Joplin 38,424 Jasper Sussex DE 80,356'` St.+Landry .__ LA 80,364._ Merrimac NH 80,925 Crawford PA : 811342- ' Cattaragus NY -81,666 I Kent '_. Whatcome DE WA -81,892 81,950 Bellingham_ 39,797 Lenawee f bfanitowac MI WI 81,951 " 82,294 Manitowac 33,180 43,359 Howard IN IN ' 83,198 83,955 Kokomo Marion 40,043 Grant ' Allegany 14D - 84,044 Clmber .and- 29,084 Windham Fond Du Loc, Cr WI 84,515 84,567 Fond Du Loc` 35,330 Robeson NC,: 84,842 Frederick _ IND SC 84,927 85,216 Rock Hill 33,619 York Monroe IN 85,221- Bloomington 43,148 Wayne SC_ 85,408" Goldsboro 26,373 Washington : RT ; 85,706 Porter IN" 87,114 Wayne Jackson OH MS: 87,123 87,975 Moss Point 18,746 Okaloo5a Jefferson FL NY 88,187 88,50S Watertown 30,525 Weld CO ' 89,297 Greely 39,167 25,470 Florence SC CO 89,636 89,900 Florence _; Ft. Collins 43,098 Iarimer Rolan NC- 90,035 Salsbury: 22,486 Catawba NC 90,873 St. Charles MO 92,954 Aroostook ME` RI 94,078 _ 94,228 Newport 33,866 Newport Jackson OR _ 94,533 Medford 27,950 Kennebec 14E 95,306 Barnstable Sheboygan MA 141 96,656 96,660 Sheboygan- 47,959 Vermillion- IL FL 97,047 97,155 Danville Bradenton 42,090 20,284 Manatee Kankakee IL 97,250 _;,_ Kankakee 30,529 Marathon" WI 97,457 Wausau 32,395 Ashtabula _:Chittenden OH YT 98,237 99,131 - - Burlington 38,633 Northumberland PA' PA -99,190 99,267 -State College 33,167 Centre Lebanon PA yY 05 - Humboldt CA 99,652 f • • APPENDIX E MASS TP.ANSIT IN IOWA 1. Operating deficits for cities under50,000: - 1973 1974 Ames $ 19,350. $ 35,445. Burlington 53,453. 105,976. Clinton 147,216. 116;978• Iowa City 211,191. 255,309. Marshalltown 19,420. 19,113: Mason City 18,000.(est.) 18,000.(est.) 0ttum-da 105,696. 99,957. TOTAL $577,332. $651,778. - 2. Operating deficits for cities over 50,000:-x t 1973 1974; "- Cedar P.4pids $101,044. $191,311. -Council Bluffs 136,551. _ 182,498. Davenport 233,879. 301,696 Des Moines 366616. 708,171. Dubuque 444,998. 302,245. Sioux City 127,722. 324,187. Waterloo _ 189,176. 255,892. TOTAL $1,599.986. - $2,266,003. * Data compiled by Joann Gross, Department of Transportation, City of kMes, - -Ames ; `Iowa • p`El7 JUid 6 197 - - �'(n'h JhJ� 75 �r • ^' �'^ ,�.<.+' > -._ Kms' • • � . u s�, t fa ' %���'y: �>' rttt �'�'L• '.117N EK iilll Waal - `r ri .� i M1� � yY f�,•ca, =a f ;�t �-s' PaNir9 S,r„•<� _ ' eti�aZ� an •s D.tllas research - } [n the comp Y es of building oroj and developmederv.nt department stud - al cot on rep tiiiv types -Funned it, 1964 as a ;ter cc ts witlti it constnlction tens ofy to tractor firm Dallas -based Luther tvr. than one year. That is to say, +' methoduof pre -cast ng con develop Hill & Assoc— Inc. cocnpl�tcd its a is to be repeated structure th( Uulli it typ components on site and for Pre - I first d signlbuild;Parking, several times by the contractor; and elevator ineerin, costs can be 'casting 'stairwells projzcf n Dallas in 1971. Cre�nt end zoo rOYed shafts, major expense items in park-; I;efor, that. of course, had!bC'es7 offset, tile h total product imp o ins Facility construction.'ilill also is co ht I'tion of gfCtce comp atut the designer/builder le:unino e`Qepmenting with air support v treltrit: and ouses and distribution cell on the process her Ittened. and a large buildinti g 11111 began pushing the repetitive structures tocre�enseuce loniconstruc- terS, :.. unnecessary t campus of -Southern Methodist concept within -his company in tion jobs due to inclement weather.. y'Univer;ity. But 1971 was the year 1970 after it was founded. Itather - that Luther Bill recognized the , for instant profit, the Luther lull formalized the e than buildm, research and development re_d for cjuality design and con company soug}tt projects that Tent unit i I structiun of multi level parkin:; themselves to technology, repeat- unit in late 1973 `bio with his staff ability, and the comPaPy's research Richard Tuel er, L structures — Cor'hosPitals office concepts.' and ,their activities for Luther Hill , retail establishments, and and marketing municipal government agencies. Forcxample, hill recently com- are almost unique inroidconstrue- buildings erch d a (le- m t. pr,s._Tn. the 1 He and his staff d velope leted design and construction of a _ and industry. This p i .ign/build concept that would pro-' p ire -cast concrete parkin Company concedes is a calculated ix Icwel ! vide _rester cost efficiencies, on facility that features a❑ expert- COmble especially %vhen blended and closer super ung prom g time Col"Pletion, ` mcnt:d section of tope into the design/build'approach. =inion thalt the traditional construe- But; Cather lull is pointing to high - i• z�Nle'ral-COnir 'CCOI5. Isilmg---construction 511711') ilati❑g--; ., trop me soil oCa't t.ther lull way, improved quality, and _o! nhutid. inc us fiber quality settee for its medical I p sit, , 1�, formance. Tile paving =vire center clients and cus;o I e s,ch e� glass rc inforcin� in place of 4 uhl.res ,t proven System of total 1 '- `projeet management incorpotate(I , a goalin an industry that i❑ one turnkey.. contract. Using. mcsh.'1-llc fibers, about th size r,f conlmc-cial sector Broach," lGl1 has often a,pzll 1} lead ',111d one to inches tn� the team apt - long, u� nli';cd with the concrete. traditionally has been marred by said, "we coordinate all the !tic improved by capitalizing on its c_ •orate 1Ce ll t of the- Tile results indicate a crack resist- repeated mistakes rather clan.: vioustr F• ant watertight stnacturz that i successes. various design co s(lltauts and con- ulpzrior to the conventional dz,U itractors becatts� r YC [l t 1 I I4utII Illll j ,:is it paid off' Lvldznti} l4 11I11ttI+. , t 1 11 I = e!` ` ttte ant Iwo Years Lulhct hill:[ it, P 1 has-been selected to. -nine Malys q- i. I l ill �',� lla�� ) !i!!1I fl In 1 3 I ilea n+h old Parkin', stru . ,.. prof- tltj. I. eL vaS tlt eontrac . totaling S23.8 - ,as becom�� I3 } ; 1 fan 1" ' II ilillll tl of ;11n11: II �.lii I , nullio t Citc cot ! Y r{an Hi reg.ognvLd r• uoaaily as } SP��i.,i,ts. contributing111lIIII , �: . SICUCIUft. s r r II 11 - j0 t11 5 C CO!'llitlOn and ll{11115try It l,�>i 2110 COntpali}',5. . 77 If ,.till t 1 .P 1 + it ,ILA �! F I .derS}{tp :5. .. .�.- - I,ti , - x (I i (�;�I",,}j( it 111; ��--r�,t 1 I ; L•; } IcSea Cil and product (Ic CloPme•1t _ f 1J n t Iglu .!-%! , -T Y -t g • i , I ' actiuly almost unheard Of til �w�J I liti altt7!!il t t , 1++1! i 1 P the i'ollv611non;,1 construe tum ih_I I dii':Ily. I>t5i�;nlhnlltl ullnwti I ulhl r a '' I !lilt to explor god develop bel huiiding �S�ten and con•jr{icjion inethOds. brie lit Tower nfjlce buildi,rg is a„ attractive addrtiat to duwnto=cri /gallas. C lu I Illhs viett retii arch 1 a luxury Cnntpirtcd in 1973, the I titter llilt-built 728 -car parkin,; stnrctura jrrr 3U(!I 13r}'an I trade affurdilhl(. by :1 conte ... es he C t t: IJtJ T7'budd is aterm InCCCasmflly u tl m ih con,truct,on indu,try. I. ]!as h co nc a "buzzword" 1c the parkinStructures businsbccIUSe _�-Wo( au -.d more bUildi l' own -s and t { ?1 .y Ufi a.O rs 01 parU il" ,p:CtiifCs are '`�f%e'r�J�P{ ^'f� I i .{- I�llt� �ry, t'4R,71�_.t0 tRLS Ila. 1.1 othod for 1 = t•r ,Yfr �~ 2g, f t rkin, facilities. their 1 U sl ;r!b( 111 eiv=s tilt Owl' r total Ll �i n ind coil>iruc..on cost o l eu;nput:tive turnkey price. it i li it Is i sy st m of planning and con- tion on lila► ' %-V1 *� 1! l s+nl .ion m which' lanai contras- ti ur__.— $�t"S, { .l ;r i�IlIII11�I1 � 1 for, .that Ci. WlUtllim� (,❑ Ine r, �1„ (J'/ ., . l �. 1s �, c s log d s.eb oninctors and material r %:l, t' e ill Ta, -flr.'J. ..� -l1 :A I;I n '_-,r}'tsf ,.lpplirrs conduct prouucttve and cooperative (liaio.ues and work as Ue+h.r Hill -Parking- Structure Specialists utilize 1e, mibuud to benef:, lu customers tilese stats: , '* w.ex . titin prices are atfcrecl 1101111 "-"^"�•"�,,�,�� F� rl�>.�,� �„ �c1 � sct.th initial plan., and speci_Axii -f Ication� _ �F�ra �'✓• 1 -i - .-. �;? �. prohlcnis are considered be- fu e _ y? ` fare ilteyari_e;Ltulrs'r/hll•ParkingStnrchdes VrcePresident Dan Waters (left). revieiv'sadesrgnlburld construction IN fast, as 110111 14,111 with a parkingstnictnrenlvrler. design and constrictiondue to Luther Hill's experi functions Operate concur- structures have quality rent through strict enforcement of ince as parkin.- structure construction and design are proven construction tech - Spcclalists. is the key to ni ues. Single responsibility fficient and e,:onomlcal. qall Co is oil time. the learning curve is stabilized Hi owner's n1builctwn with Luther Hill's (tcven/build concept By ti-x.-3e?XY•`F� F' having one source of responsibility F rr -e r•ti l`�K4 ' c. +. •*: tr,,!v.' <� ! ^' i ?s SS',a ti for all dcse,nand constfuchon, the �: '`' n^, 3 4'`,^rY 'Y`'y"�1,`b"S. y j $�.., �`x..,r. ,« tra(Iitloltal adVClsar • role between- and Owl end contractor is t ,~xr,'`_ eliminated rr Luther hill phos make it possible, '' r i �� ' {? «Ith-design/Budd. for a quality: '�v'i parkin, strilcture to bei ilial fast, + 1 x� efl lciently, economicatl , on-time, `rih� and; within budgetary restrictions. i ary +L�aQ<,&, l •1 .r �•� t „��Z1,93�,�« T/tis rc the fast r,suz of ncrtrtrz Talk.a quarterly Publication of Luther llilbl'arkurg Structure Spe- . cialists It isc!ccli('atctl to Providing information on the parking s;nicnve inebatrpcad LutlrcrHill-s •des: II/nt.ih' cwttr;a: Conarertts. S gnesrtons. mrd confrihiltons of 1 I a I inju,n,ation jrtrtn readers arc lvcicu,nr; I'lcase anrtacl Bob L. hr/linn.:direr:Parking Talk:. ;.: Luther llill'S At or. l'. U. Box .Smu:: k=rs Medi -^a. ( r•t•.'r. S, n Ar Unio• nolo c'rijnrs tea, naduleve! parkin{ stnrehrre 31;06. Uallas. Texas 75234. --.des{dyed and built G-• Luther hill rt Assoc•.. Dallas. - 4;.. r Sit Luther !{ill s newest design/build parking structure to open for husr Hess is ort, completed in taiay for t{,e City of Charleston (\1'. Va.) hat has si. levels, is of almost 600- ,]at 000 car capacity. and includes a 21.000 J square ,eef retail shmm eppg all. Eudt at cost of S2.4 tnillion tilt { . Lam.' parking structure contract to Luther11i11 is 40 percent below the =' Fzs conventional construction bids ihC Ppssl,� city received. This w ♦ InadC � tom•$• 1•,� Ule by Luther Hill sdesign/build -z tr>km�g _.�z F;�= ticid (luallty system —. pTOVIdI»g control -a uiscipluied timetable, and a fixed contract amount. These are attracii:e Cost satin'.!s b - iefits to Public, to supported t^encics. C '�C� CtiG L Lit, l EEousc�cc re v:ii,, s I. i,lnn'is A loci Aller.Cen!er's'si>-s!ory parking r building, notable tot total ,bscnut Assoc•-tz :n'chitect for the parking- eek strucitirc, n,' ceras O»c-tray .loped; p irking ates as arcl,itccts fof Vie :Center. _ structure. now under construction in columns m -lilt drnin and p' The structure is to be aitotncr Uy l_uthcr 1 -lit, & �a<oc. in center, Moor desr}pts eliminate lost pato rownu'' \IlutCen-; city-ltqustun; also will house :t traditionally needed for separate clement of flu 132.0(70 -square foot tennis facility Ian,�,< I our elevators will serve for cornplcs ilial includes Hotel, - and licalth club. custotncrs' needs' and the thcatel, and three office. to vers Located on Uic ioP �tory of til parkins i» its initial development phases _ parnitt building; the tcnms!hc:dth t Yoi»,h/ILidawifacility- 71tc. is consulting Additional <_tructures for 1IIen { club will be completely enclosed, with ,r 11 be coedryecly enclosed, sed,liviengineer and Ted A. Howard and Center ::rc in plain irg atageS al ronnlenl The heahh facility will have 14 tennis coutis. l0 handball f�eview of track. sa»Has. 4.ufEter Eii[� Parking Strucf�re AccompEish.rrleizts: courts.. a loggla�. -... v •hirlpool Uailts and locker rooms ;ls of Aiay 1, 1975. this as rile record of Luther Hill — Pzrl.iug Structurl A,i13Elisis: formcn and wotttcn- Pito)ECTILOCATION CAPACITY CO:IPLETION 20000 A ioun a Willi complete bar goo cars October. 1971 51.2 facilities, a titirsery-- and a pct shop Ike tier, Dand allas Sl 250,000 are additional features of tilt 723 cars April, 1972 luxurious club. An observation Dzila200 1 �pmtTon•cr 5L7 3.000 deck will overlook the courts for 1,200 cars Kovember.1973 club visitors and sports spectators. ce°ter,SailAAt Antoniedical io Ai:irch, 1974 c 925,000 When completed in November, 553 cars - 1975 the hcaltl: facility will be St.llo nt Ittlicaumonl April, :51,441.000 among the finest m Houston. Allen 1 - 5 iG cars An - Center patrons can drive ,hen cars Parl:ersburg,IW- VaSt, Jowph's .9711' '5 :000 into tile- five -level 145 car eapac 5(00 cars October 1 ity parking struciurc. and take an S usteleis crcclaty elevator to ilio health club without 590 cars May, 1975 ossiUly uncoip City of Charleston, beinI g exposed to P \'lest Virginia% ust 1975 54,3'3;.000 fortable weather conditions. 2,145 cars ' Aug Luther Hill received the 54.3 "on"' 2,000 - ark.tng strut- 2,0G0cars �Aucc<t,.1975 million AllenCer.tcr p Pcacblrcc Sinnmit llddcontractin1974,andutilizing Ofl'iccGaup)ex. Atl:ntta 55,339,Co0 its it concept, will lout 2 2.15 cars ' Deccvnlru; 1775 -(•ciloler'illi ut over the completed stluchne to itsi Miami Office rtplex 53,000,000 d- tci 975- \YetcMarch. 1976 ovmers mra1e Ianlu,i Withinihecollsiructiontrtriitirue _ 'file.. AIIcnCcntcr Parking lacility will Uc an `aesthelicapy pleasing ` alSo inchrdea otlu.r fzciI:Iies (retail commercial space. etc.) • `1_U -her ;-fill is probing. • .. s N �fi r-A�' _� ('!r{•' �uj]:::jc �. K.E :ri Lid . t'•s%t'3'.(' i�W y I t> --. \ DUOo ,N �"~ t ��p�� G ii7 tiapai.(_—� tY , -.7.�l. - Win`_ .? �. J•Y 1,�� 1�1--..�%-' 2001 Bryan Tower in Dallas. Now, with Lt th-r hill'. __ _ _ — Now we're proving ii on these D-s+gnJL'uild nt .host of con - i , y� r _; projects: tracUng;`you cin g the°Peachtree Summit, Atlanta, parkin,', ata price that s within your budgcL i Georgia. S4.0 million, l -level. 2000- , You'll get a fixed contract amount for total cost car precast concrete structure. Completion time of dcsigti and contnlction. And have one con- 12 months to coincide with opening of 30 -story tractor _Cotner hill - •vito's accountable to office tower. you for ever} pttac of the project. \llenCenter, Houston, Texas. 54.3 million, 6 -level, 214= -car precast concrete structure. Completion By bringing the planners, architects, engineers time 12 months. i and construction personnel within our own operations, Luther Mill creates project cl"li- Omni International, Miami, Florida. S6.0 million, ciencies that enable its to: I) reduce the time 8 -level, 2200 -car precast concrete structure. manctng: 2) beat the Completion timed I months in 2 phis s so retail required for t ou, interim I _ clock on iIlc Is{ , coats of material and labor, firm in the megastructure can remain open. 3) cotnalcte v our revenu producm,_ str acture IF you need a multi-level parking structure, t; k on timc'or ahead of sdtedule• with Luther Hill's Parking Structure Specialists. Luther Hill has proved this capability across the Plhatthey're doing for iltcse owners they can L. S. oil proiects. such a� Trantnicll Crow's do for vou. Call or write today. t�M ER M_ P. ('�m4n•❑ Uan %•:den• Vice l're.Gicnl-- - 2405dla CM -k. %'111C 225 • I'.O. Il,,t.3430G-Itn11.15, l'cus 75734 • 2 WI('20"272'1 Cl hia adv'.•it1,smunl vial pabliclied in the April, 1975 iQ,nc of/Or1l+lieg ihu n u L'nrrslmclior.) City of Iowa M =MORANDVM DATE: June 20, 1975 TO:Dennis Kraft, Neal Berlin FROM: Lyle G. Seydel, housing Coordinator P, RE: Project IA 22-2, Elderly Housing The :sequential steps in the processing of Project 22-2 from this--date _through initial occupancy are as follows: A. Large Scale Residential Plan (LSRD). ) Municipal code requires the submission for approval (1 of (1a Large Scale Residential Development Plan. This is to be submitted by the developer..to Planning and Zoning Commission. There, is no reason to believe that old Capitol _could not submit their plan by (2) 'Upon receipt the Planning Staff will be required to review and write a study and recommendation._ The plan could be placed on the agenda for Planning and Zoning meeting scheduled -for July 10, 1975. (3)-Staff--.and-Planning and Zoning recommendation could be placed.on Council agenda for Tuesday, July 15, 1975. B. site and Market Analysis. (SAMA) (1) For projects to befinanced with a HUD insured mortgage the developer is required to submit a SAMA application to FHA. The developer'has indicated that. the SAMA I_ applicationwas filed with FHA on June 20. confirmed was -confirmed with an-FHA representative during a p one conversation on-June 20. Time forprocessingand app is conversation unclearathis time. In the event the SAMA is not approved or an FHA mortgage is not available the _developer will be required to seek an alternate means. The writer is-confident FHA will provide priority processing d do all within their, means to approve the financial plan C Building Permit. (1) The Iowa City Uniform Building Code requires that developers apply for Building Permits. An important and pace setting factor is the development of the detailed - be _submitted with the request,-f drawings that must or a --Building--Permit. "Informal information obtained from several dif.fernnt architects indicate -th six weeks would be regUirod to produce n'r7etai:l.ed plans. Using this as the determining factor. the Building International Institute of= Municipal Clerks Conference 700 'clerks were welcomed by Governor of. Colorado, _ Richard Lamm, although he was busy :because 'of a riot at = the penitentiary.- He stated that municipal -officials are the glue that holds the -government together. The Keynote Address was given by Dr. Frank. Court of Denver who advised if the clerks _did not take home -a thing from- the Conference, just being away from -the crunch of city government should give some serenity so we could go back and cope. Ilecommentedthat what sets people apart are those -willing to go the 'second mile' Life makes us do certain things, the first mile; but when you are free to make a choice, that is the second mile. `And if 'life goes sour, thank God for large garbage cans. Junk the 'sour' and start ;over. He advised of the need for inner - security, faith and dreams, suggesting you are old only if your dreams are all re -runs. (He was 83.and spoke for 45 minutes without notes.) I attended the Monday morning session 'Women's Role in Local Government' instead of 'Labor Relations:: The speaker was Mary Buchanan, Secretary of State, Colorado, Who pointed out that women have 35 years or so after mother- hood to develop or continue a career, and to apply mother/ family skills to a career, as they also include manage- mentm of time and communication: The afternoon session was 'All That You Wanted to Know About: Records Management`But Were Afraid to Ask'.The expert was Katherine Aschner, Director of Records-Manage- aent Division, Uational' Archives and Records Services, General Services Administration, Washington, D.C. Tacoma, Washington used revenue sharing money to set up their records management -system, $35;000, and hired 2_", persons to operate it, $25,000 a year. IG in- eludes -Files Management: Standardization, Disposition, Documentation and Retrieval; Reports Managemt�,nt; Central Clearinghouse, Functional Reports and Published Reports'; Council Agenda; Word Processing; Directives: Management; .,Policies, Guidelines, Reproduction/Printing; Forms Manage - Ment a sophisticated system for larger cities. The second afternoon -session was Council Minutes and Agenda Preparation. One idea presented was the Consent Calendar which was used by about 1/2 -of the -cities repre- _-sented'. All routine, non -controversial items are listed at the beginning' -of the agenda - minutes,- Council and Board & Commission; bills, City Manager and City Attorney reports; some resolutions(accepting;'secoers,--streets,' etc.) motionstoreceive and-file.correspondence;_::beer & liquor " and cigarette permits; appointments. These are adopted by one motion, one vote, after the Mayor has inquired if any Councilmember or cit:i.zen wants to .discuos,`any of the items. Any question on bills, awards,of-contrac,ts,_or_nin- utes corrections are investigated by Councilmembers before the meeting.,One Council had routinely adopted up to 100 Page -2 - Clerks Conference items in this manner. Council can adopt thisprocedure• by a_Ilolicy statement. In other cities, the tentative agenda was sent with a Consent Calendar; the cut-off day for agenda items was Wednesday the:agenda-was sent Thursday;. and Council removed items -from the Consen t_Calendar by; Friday. Final agenda was Monday, meeting Tuesday. - Citizen participation was usually limited to five minutes; scheduled oral presentations were listed on public discussion cardapplicationforms turned into the Clerk before the meeting started - then handed to the Mayor to call on in the order he wished. Anyone not filling, out the application card waited until the end of the meeting for unscheduled oral discussion. If someone needed more than five minutes they _could note this on the card. `Tueday's meetings were on Effective Communications - 'The Key to_P_ublic Understanding'. The panel= started discussion 46 methods of communication were given(list attached). Then they asked for workable ideas used by others. The ideas_ presented were:-- 1) erer1) Youth Government Day - participants are given' certificates 2) for larger cities; -Hot Line for immediate com- plaint service -;-some use 24-hour recording devices, although, some citizens just 'do nor know which' department handles what they wish to complain about. 3) Free Notary Service provided by the City. 4) Value of ---listening to the input of employees. 5) Veterans Commissions:- free copying of papers for veterans. 6) Senior Citizens Commissions - free copying of birthcertificatesand other papers for senior -citizens. 7) -Youth Commissions --or youths on other commissions - youths ride wreckers, ambulances, police cars, etc. 8) Keys to the City for visitors - small keys for children - foreign students - larger keys for VIP's. 9),Mayor's Column in`newspaper -- or Councilmembers take turns. 10) Importance of relating to employees; they project Council-image=to public. 11) Teenage Courts -teenage judge and jury for misde- meanor charges. 12) One full agenda packet provided for all-Press-- specific ll Press - specific items can be'reproduced if requested. 13) Sunshine Law - adopted for restoration of con- fidence in local government; in Florida and Nebraska �rrohl.hit:n < eriit. (.vc su1;n 1.ona ; -no tcJO CallncJaaccbEca can meet without Press; all documents are open - including arbitration and personnel; if two Council- Methods 1. Radio Broadcasts 2. Radio. Public Service Spots 3. Radio PaidAdvertisements 4. Television Broadcasts 5• Television Public Service Spots 6. ` Television Paid Advertisements 7: Motion Picture Films 8.- Slide Presentations 9. :Speakers Bureau 10.; Closed Circuit Television ll- Cable Television 12. The Grapevine .13. Information Centers 14: Telephone Piewslines 15. :Public Address Systems. - 16. Publicity 17 ---Press Relations 18. Newspaper Advertisements 19. Letters to the Editor 20. House Publications 21. Annual Reports 22: Newsletters 23- -Personal Letters 24. Direct ;flail 25. --=Inset is 26.._Enclosures- 27• Information Racks 28- Brochure; ' 29. Handbooks'' 30. 14anuals 31- Books 32. -Bulletin Boards --,33.=::Signs - 34: 'Posters - = 35 - Billboards 36. -Reprints 37. Tours 38. Open Houses -39- Staged -Events - 40. Demonstrations 1,1. -Exhibits 42. Displays 43- Opinion Sampling 44. Public Hearings, Meetings - 45:=Wor1<nhop,� hfi:. Symposiums - • Jurle 19, 1975 - • FOURTH ADDENDUM TO PART I OF CONTRACT FOR SALE OF LAND FOR PRIVATE REDEVELOPMENT By and Between - Old Capitol Associates, a Partnership,' and The City of Iowa City, a municipal corporation the The following -amendments and modifications are hereby made in terms, covenants and conditions.forming Part I:hereof: 1. Schedule C is amended to read as follows: SCHEDULE C LAND DELIVERY SCHEDULE Parcel No. Total Price-: Take -Down Date 64-1 65-2 $158,912 All property listed herein shall 65-4 72,800 be_conveyed and paid for on 174,307 81-3 or before March 1'r1976 105,000 81-4 841375 82-1 74,800 83-1 912,720 - 84-1 563,200 93-1 114,000 101-2 171,000 102-1 14,896 102-2 15,075 102-3 90,750'. - 102-4- 52,500 103-3 121,500 • -2- :• 2. Schedule D is amended to read 'as follows: SCHEDULE D CONSTRUCTION COMMENCEMENT AND COMPLETION SCHEDULE Parcel No. Commence Estimated. Completion 81-3 Sept., 1975 1 Sept., 1976 81-4 Sept., '1975 Sept., 1976 103-3 Oct., 1975 Oct., 1976 102-3 Apr., 1976 Apr. 1977.. 102-4 Apr., -1976 Apr., 1977 101-2 - July, 1976 'k-5 Years 93-1 Apr., 1977 * 5 Years 83-1 July, 1977 May, 1979 84-1 July, 1977 May, 1979 65-4 Apr., 1978 Apr., 1979 82-1 July, 1978 June, 1979 102-1 Apr., 1979 Apr., 1.980 102-2 Apr_, 1980 -Apr., _1981 (I 64-1 July, 1979 July, 1981 65-2 Apr., 1980 Apr., 1981 *Completion refers to entire residential/commercial improvement. ' 4.-Capitol, Burlington to ` Vacate, convey to Redeveloper> Court -- uponRedeveloper's request , 5. Dubuque, Washington to ' Burlington _ Vacate, maintain 6.`Alley, Blocks 83 and 84 Vacate, convey to Redeveloper- 7. Alley, °Block `101 Vacate, convey to Redeveloper..,-- B. Alley, Block 64 _ Vacate, convey part to Redevel- oper 9. Madison, Iowa to Burlington, Selective traffic`' restrictions under consideration 10. Washington, Clinton to Selective traffic restrictions Madison under consideration 11.-Dubuque,-Washington to Selective traffic restrictions_ Jefferson -= under consideration 12. East 40 feet of alley,' Vacate, convey to Redeveloper Block 82 - 13. South 97 feet of alley Vacate, convey to Redeveloper' Block 102. _ _ -8-_ applicable to the development of the urban renewal ' this contract.in- .the parcels.`under parts I'and -IZ of 'the requests -delivery_of-the-'deed to -' event Redeveloper any of ;these additional properties before it':,is be by city certainhat ,the air rights will used -,-the the -.Redeveloper certaivit as ded herein, the city may.require the following sums in the to deposit with the city, checks Cto the City as form of cashier's _payable -- security, for the performance of the agreement to and 84: construct the shopping mall in -Blocks 83 Deposit Property Capitol Street right-of-way $ 76,000.00 The north 310 feet of the east 204,.600.00_ one'(1/2) of;Block-101 _ The north 310 feet of the alley in 27,280.00 Block 101 I The city_ shall earn interest on the deposits: All interest, shall :be re-- a t such deposits, -Plus accrued 'to Redeveloper by ,the'-city:.on the.date__-the .turned the Redeveloper commences construction of the shopping mall. c Ifbecauseof the acts or omissions of the Redevelop- the city for. r er, the air 'rights :are not useable stby deposits plus the accrued intere, may be 1 parking the retained by the -city as -,liquidated damages. € --The city agrees.to purchase the "sou theet Marchr17,o1976st 2 -at the more or. less, of Parcel 83-1, on, appraised value ($3.22 per square foot); from the for the construction of a el Redeveloper `multi -lee this property is parking facility. If for reason for this purpose, the property not used by the city to the Redeveloper -and -the purchase price shall; revert shall_:be returned to the'City. -The city will complete for access excavation, ':gra ding and retaining walls -the `service area (basement) road to the Redeveloper's mall right-of-way of, Capitol Street as in the vacated indicated on Sheet #5 Site Planed by the -Pu- Reaeveloper`with his offer to rchasettas'amended. These substituted provisions together 'with:all previous` amendments not inconsistent herewith, and the remaining 1974 contract, constitute' unchanged portions`_of the March 19, - the agreement of the parties. The second proposed change is a change in the timing ofimplementation • • .! Urban Renewal Plan Objectives The following objectives have been established for the redevelopment and rehabilitation of the City -University Project: a. To eliminate substandard buildings, blighting influences, and environ- mental deficiencies in this important.section.'of the City of Iowa City, , and to establish conditions which will prevent the recurrence of blight and blighting conditions. b. To strengthen central Iowa City as the're-tail trade,business, financial, administrative, governmental, and cultural -center -of -the area. l c. To strengthen the economic well-being of the -central area and the City by increasing retail, activity, taxable values, ,and -job _ opportunities. d. To establish a pattern of land use activities arranged in compact, compati- ble groupings so as to enhance their efficiency of operation and economic inter -relationships. •e. To provide for the orderly physical and economic growth of the central area through, controlled redevelopment and rehabilitation. l f. To provide safe,; efficient, -and -attractive vehicular access to central Iowa- ' J City from -major, interstate and regional highways, from neighborhoods and communities throughout the metropolitan area, and from other major centers of business and; employment in the region. g. To provide a safe, efficient and attractive circulation system which mini- ' mizes conflicts between different forms of traffic such as pedestrians, ` automobiles, transit and -service vehicles. = ~� h. To encourage coordinated development of_parcels and structures in order to achieve efficient building design, multi-purpose use of sites, unified -- . off-street parking, trucking and service, and internal pedestrian linkages. i. To provide for off-street parking facilities in locations easily accessible from major thoroughfares and central area. destinations_ alike including _long-term parking facilities on ,the periphery of the .central area. J., To improve the appearance of buildings,; rights-of-way and open spaces, and to encourage high standards of design. - k. To'_aid-the University of Iowa.to expand in an orderly ,way, so the Univer- sity and the Business District can each perform its own function with = minimum conflict and mutual benefit. J Appendix I 0 -2- and Use of premises. The tenant zgrees to-use o-u smanner and py the leased premises in a careful, safe overnmental'laws,'ordi to conform and comply with any and all g remises to con rules and -regulations applicable to the leased p or ermit the leased premises _to be used for any purpose and to the tenant's use the The tenant shall not use, occupy,, P eany olicy of -insurance deemed.to be extra .hazardous on -account of fire or _other -casualty, nor commit any act which `shallenaltlloftforfeiture,of-this lease on the leased premises under penalty at the option of the City and the payment by the tenant of all damages-resulting`'from such act. or omission. In addition, t:n9: agrees to maintain the grounds ,of the leased premises including the deck area -adjacent to the modular unit in a safe and c h�an responsible, condition and to latedesnoweandcicerandatenanttshallto hbelrespo eased unit free failure to comply with these for any damages: resulting from in the event of any requirements and shall indemnify the City finding of liability. -ag enace._-The city 8; Re maintain airs and Maintandnair conditioningYeandtstructural the water system, _heating airs andmaintenance portion of the building. --All other rep if any, including painting and replacement of"broken windows, Y shall be paid by tenant. rovements Tenant, at his expense, 9 Alterations and Imp remises may install trade fixtures and equipment in the leaseto d p tions but 'shall not make any alterations or installaermissiontof the structure its without the express written p se 'City. At the expiration. of thiinalaconditionthe T,anormal nt lwear tand the -leased premises to its origin ui ment use excepted, and shall -remove its trade fixtures and equipment- excepted, q p and leave the leased premises in a neat and rescleo condition Unless otherwise agreed ,in writing any fixtures or equipment attached to the -structure -shall become the_property of the City immediately: upon attachmved at the end ent and shall not be remo ordered removed by the City. of the lease term unless 10. Signs• Exterior signs shall be prohibited on the leased premises except as permitted in writing by the City. at his expense, shall 11. Mechanic's Liens. The tenant, the tenant promptly pec or a costs and expenses incurred by casio ed by anylien or -claim with respect to the leased premises and shall hold the City harmless from any loss -or Dr -expense if it desires therefore, provided that tenant, of any such -claim s to -do so,'may contest the amount or°validity secure from loss or ok-lien so long as the Cil is adequately expense pending the determination of.such 'amount>or validity. nt 12. Default by T,_ e_ neon theIn tdueedatevent tortinhtheeevent there under shall not be paid up 'reement,of this lease, tenant shall fail to perform any other ag then upon'the`happening of -any such event the City may, at its option, either continue to collect the rent is the same falls due 'hereunder, or declare a forfeiture of this lease and take possession of the leased premises free and clear of this lease. In the event the building 13. Destruction'of Building. either, -partially or totally taining:the leased premises snail _be either p give immediate fire or other casualty, the tenant 'shall damaged by, and if the City elects not to repair notice thereof to theeCithen d ift pant may terminate this leaser. or restore such da t obligated to repair or provided,showever, the Citalterations or signs made by the tenant restore -.any improvements, restored by the tenant. recto a -an ella ].7. he reps iced Or r. -3- 14. Pro art and occu anc at Risk of Tenant. All property of any kin w ich may'<be - rought.upon or within the leased premises by he tenant, its employees, agents, customers and invitees, during the term hereof, shall beat the sole risk. of the tenant or those claiming under or-through-the-tenant, and the City shall not be liable to thetenant or, any­other person for any 'injury, loss or damage to any person or property in'or_upon the leasedpremises, and=the tenant agrees to assume all liability for or on-account of any-"such injury,_ loss or damage, and to hold the City .harmless and indemnified therefrom. The City shall not be `liable-for any injury, loss or damage to `,the tenant,its property, or to any person or any property,_ occasioned by any,. alleged default or failure by the City hereunder except andmless the city is obligated and has refused to correct such default within a reasonable time 'under the circumstances after receipt- written notice thereof from the tenant. 15. Assignment. The tenant may not assign this lease. 16. __Waiver by Conduct. The acceptance of rent after the: same is-due ereun er, -w--ether in a single instance or'-repeatedly, or one or more waivers by the ,City of any ,default by the tenant hereunder.shall,not-be-construed as a waiver of any subsequent delinquent payment or rent or other or similar default by the tenant hereunder. 17. Insurance. Tenant will be responsible for maintaining its own insurance coverage, if 'tenant desires, for business inter- ruption, fire or other loss or damage to the contents 'of the =premises, and the-tenant.shall have no right of action against the City or its insurance carrier for any-loss or damage. 18. Surrender of Premises. The tenant agrees that upon the expiration o this lease_it w 11 promptly_ remove its property and expiration o-of all persons claiming by, or-under or through the the tenant and to peaceably yield and surrender possesses at the;, leased premi es to'the-City in as good a condition as at the f this lease, normal wear and usage and commencement of -the term o or other insured casualty only excepted. damage by fire, windstorm 19 et of Profits. The City represents to tenant that it(s o rat ng t e modular units in-:order.to facilitate relocation of bu ine8aes and persons in connection with-its=downtown Urban Renewal Project. As such, the City-does-not intend nor desire to profit from this enterprise. "Consequently, when ;the modular rental program has been terminated and all costs of operation, both "direct, and indirect, have been ascertainedby.the City and if the city; finds-that.it hasmadea:profit.on the operation of these premises the City; shall refund on a reasonable basis to all tenants" participating in-the program "their, proportionate `share soffits,such profits. The manner and method of calculating costs, p and he like shall be determined in the sole discretion of the City; Council of the City of-Iowa City and their determination and - connection with this matter shall be final. 20. Merger. All prior negotiations, conversations, under- standings and agreements-by andbetweenthe City and the tenant pertaining to this lease agreement are merged herein., 21. Modification. No provision of this lease ,shall be altered, modifed or amended :unless evidenced by written instrument executed by;the city and the :tenant. Honorable Mayor ^ad June 21, 1375 _ 2 City Council of I_o.•ra Ci-y approve in :writing such Construction Plansand no oval further filing by the;Redeveloper or app- by the Agency thereof shall be required except with resect to any material change. Thtr z abode is the basic conact language dealing with design controls. As cart be seen from the above cited language, especially the provisions of Section 301 of Part LI, _the City's design control over redevelopment is limited to_a determination as to whether ;or he Age pro conforms to the Urban Renewal Plan and posed developmethe Agree- e of course_ very f6w ecific directives went, -along with state and local building codes and the like, Since the Urban Renewal Plan itself contains basically the urban 'renewal with respect to design and con important, it seems to me for the contract or agreement- to :which reference_ must be made on the issue of design control.' It is for that reason- f L e City ,to strictly construe that aspect of c[ as P sibleval contract in order to retain as much control over the project The other question that you had dealt with the nature of the deposit S by the redevelopzr and the circumstances under which it is 100, 000.00 subject to_for,`.he re ." The original urban renewal-contract of Dlarch 19, eloper, to submit a $ 1974, ,in Section 3, required- the redev performance deposit. Subsequently, in the Second Addendum to the con- trreturned to act, the amount-pias-changed to $111,300.00. -t original contract provided that a pro rata portion of the deposit would baevelopment also p _ the rededeloper as the redeveloper took that that P began of the deposit orL of each specific parcel. That is to say, attributable to a particular parcel tivoitld be returned�to the developer at sLe uch time as the redeveloper had taken tittle to the ground and had obtained f in.2 ntsoare foundtin subsection ds and enL red nof Section 3 ofto a tPart Ion t act. Those req id not The Department of for handling the deousing posi -L and therefo- and Urban Development re the con- approve this p 1374 in the document entitled tract :vas amended on September 10, -avoid this "ffemorandum Agreement Third Addendum to Part 1" toor - problem. Specifically, thatP.�'nendme nouldbealterereturned tto he redeveloper 3 of Part I tc provide that the depo. ., at such -time as the redeveloper has supplied evidence to the City that it _- is-=committecl to begin construction on the last parcel of land upon which Honorable Mayor and June 24 1975 City Council of-Iowa City -2- approve in writing such ConstructionPlans and val no' further filing by the Redeveloper or appro except by the Agency thereof _shall-be req with respect to any material change. The above isthebasic contract language dealing with design controls. �cial guage, esp As can be seen from the ection 301 of part II, thelCity's ndesign control over provisionsprovisions o redevelopment is limited to a determination as to whether or not gree and the Ag- posed'developmentconforms to the Urban Renewal Plan ment, the along withftstate and enewal Planatselflco trains verycodes afewe specific diorectives Sinceit basically the urban renewal' with respect to design and construction, it seems to me, for the contract or: agreement to which reference must be made on the-issue of design control. It is for that reason ect of herurban renewal contract in order city__to strictly construe that asp ro'ect as possible. to retain as much control over the p j The other question that you had dealt with the nature of the deposit er submitted fy the ureeVelo or sinal urban renewal r and the econtract `of Marchhich it 19,- subject to 100, 000.00 1974, in Section 3, required the redeveloper to submit a performance deposit. Subsequently, 1n 300. oo. The ohe Second riginal conendum to t act con - performance the amount was changed to $111, also provided that-a; pro rata portion of the deposit would be returmnt the redeveloper as the redeveloper took `that thaand portion ofetl the deposit of each specific parcel. That is to say, attributable to a particular parcel would be returned to the developer at such time inancinriper entsdand enteredtaken title to 'he rou into-agonstruct and ona ontract. obtained f g commm : d in subsection d of, Section 3 of Part I. Those requirements arefoun The Department of Housing and Urban Development did not approve this procedure for handling the d4p°nithe document entitlednd therefore the n tract was amended on September 10, to avoid this "MemorandumAgreem that amendmenrd Addendum tered subto Part section d of Section Problem. Specifically, 3 of Part I to provide that the deposit wOevidenceetotthe. City dthatliter at such time as the redeveloperhassupplied struction on the last parcel of land upon which is committed to begin con Honorable Mayor and City Council of Iowa City - 3 - June 24, 1975 construction is scheduled under Schedule D of the contract. Thus, the deposit would not be returned in pro rata portions. and would be held by the City until development on the last parcel is underway.' However, you will note that subsection d makes reference to Section 702 of Part II of the contract.: Section 702 of Part Il of the contract, as modified in Part I of the contract, provides in pertinent part as follows: In the event that (b) the redeveloper -shall, --after preparation of construction plans for -any parcel satisfactory to the Agency, -furnish evidence - satisfactory to the Agency, that it has been unable, after and despite diligent effort for a period of 60 days; after approval by the Agency, of the parcel `construction `plans, ,to_obtain mortgage financing for the construction of the improvements on any such parcel on a basis and on terms that would generally be considered satisfactory by .builders or contractors for improvements of the nature and type provided in such parcel construction plans, and the redeveloper shall, after having submitted such evidence -and if so requested by the Agency, continue to make diligent effort to obtain such financing fora period of 60 days after such "request, but without success, then the agreement shall, at the option of the redeveloper, be termi- nated by written notice thereof to the Agency as to such parcel or part thereof, and the redeveloper shall be entitled to a return of a pro rata portion of the `deposit and neither the Agency nor the redeveloper shall have any further rights against or liability; to the other under the agreement as ,to : such parcel or part thereof provided that the redeveloper shall immediately reconvey the parcels involved to the Agency -free of all liens and the Agency shall return the purchase_ price. To summarize the language of Section 702, if the redeveloper has :prepared construction plans and they have been approved by the City, and then the redeveloper ,is unable to obtain' mortgage financing after diligent effort of a type that would be considered generally satisfactory,