HomeMy WebLinkAbout1976-05-18 Council minutes•2 )t
Y -
� x
a ,
Page 2 OfficialzActions ?-=
May 18,.,`1976
Jim Stier, 2401 Mayfield-Road and Ketifi Klinger,-_;101 Mt: Vei
appeared regarding the petition, ;item 3=d-T The mofion tSa9
approved by the following roll call vote• iBalmer;,deProsse;
Foster, Neuhauser, Perret, Vevera. Absent:' Selzer
Moved:by Foster and seconded-b';y:Balmer to set a Public`
Hearing to Rezone a Tract of=Land for. Whit ehouseiEnterp isef
from Cl Zone to C2 Zone for June 8,_1976,, at 7 30SP M ,:in at
Council Chambers-at the Civic Center. Motion,adopted,�:Selze
absent.
Moved by Vevera and seconded by;Foster:to adopt Resolu
tion_'No. _76-140,,'recorded in Resolution;
• ! • T
J I
Page 3 Official: Ac
May 18,'197
the `_City of.lowa City for that ;purpose Roll call:
Foster,;Neuhauser; Perret, Vevera,= Balmer,-__,deProsse
none. Absent: `- Selzer. ` Resolution: "adopted, 6/0._:''
Moved by deProsse.and seconded by Vevera to re
._ Public Hearing for Storm Water;, Management_ Ordinance
1976,1at-7:30P.M. in the Council Chambers: Motion
Selzer absent.
Mayor Neuhauser noted the_OrdinanceiProvidin4-,
Discontinuance of Service, the Establ" ment.of."Lic
paid`, Water_ Bills and Repealing;Section,VI2_of Ordna
would be deferred until=requested information is,'pi
Moved by Foster and seconded byVevera that tk
to.jRevise the Amortization Schedule;for,Removal`of
ing Signs be considered'at this time'an&l given ,thix
passage. Mayor Neuhauser and Councilman1Perret.not
would vote '^no"; Balmer indicated he would
man. -Selzer was: absent. Councilmen Foster,andVeve:
their motion. Moved by Foster and sec'on'ded by�'deP3
fer-the Ordinance.to next week Motion -.adopted, NE
voting "no";.Selzer-absent;'S/1. ? _
-Moved by.deProsse and seconded by Vevera that'
nance-`for the -Planned -Area Development Planof: Part
of.:MacBride>Addition, Part. 1,{be.given final vote=:
and.adopted Roll -call: Ayes: "Neuhauser; Perret
Balmer, deProsse,^Foster. Nays: none.,jiAbsent
Ordinance No. 716-2796 recorded in Book 10,lpiges9.
6/0. ,
Moved`by deProsse;and seconded*:by Vevera to 'a
lution No. 76-142;"recorded in Book35,jpages.172=
inT a Preliminary and `Final Large,._Scale'Resident a
ment Plan fora Replat of a`Portion`of Lot; 23,;;of,`
Addition, Part 1. Roll'call:_Ayes:._Perret, Veve
deProsse, Foster,-Neuhauser. ;Nays: 'r. none..,- Absent
Resolution' adopted, 6/0. z
1 _
Moved:by deProsse and seconded by Perret toIa
lution No.:.76-,143,-,recorded in Book,35, pages 175=
proving a Preliminary,'and.Final.Plat andSubda.visi
plat One of a -Part of Lot 23,,MacBr2Lde Addition..
Ayes: Vevera, Balmer, =deProsse; Foster�;;Neuhauser
Nays:none. Absent: Selzer: Resolutionadopted
Moved `by.Balmerand seconded 14 deProsse to' -,a
lution No. -76-144, ,recorded in Resolution:Book_;35`
Establishing a`Fee for`Certain Services -Performed
Department. Roll,calT:'-Ayes: Vevera,,Balmer,+dE
Foster, Neuhauser; Terret. Nays: no Absent:
Resolution; adopted, 6/0. ?
sion='of;:the recent',ruling handed down
the'Urban Renewal `lawsuit . ,He'said hi
should be discussed inopen session
sporided- dec;.sions are difficult -to. mak
you :heed-; to''iiully. and frankly discuss`:
potential actions'of various paities`i
are going.to:do, especially if,;;they;ax
Ne
-th
W from-: the. news :media. ' t'Afte:
user asked`that'a.motion -be.ma4
time. = There was no motion. ,,'y
creasein.'the eligibilityinc
order?to'incoiporate_those in
bydeprosse to aecept'the,'revii
section B,Housing.'-" Motion adoj
..%,Xun. AiLer.:. LUrtherdiscussion,jCounci:
the.'question. Roll call: .Ayes:_ deProi
Balmer. Nays: ,;Poster,'Perret ,Councilr
Motion adopted,; -;4/2. _Roll call on adopi
No.'76 129 ,.`recorded in Res. Book 35;pe
the, Destruction of'the Animal.- Ayes:L`I
Balmer, deProsse.. ` Nays::, ; Perret: i°Abser
Resolution adopted, 5/1.After a -re- -
,tion;` moved by ;Foster and seconded `byYPE
Resolution and ;delay, action for--."48`hourf
Perret, AeProsse, Foster.. Nays:.,:Neuhat
Abstain:Selzer. ::Motion failed, 3;3:,-,
Moved by Selzer and =:seconded by Ba]
quiring that ordinances..must be consideY
age :at' two Councilsmeetings_;prior to the
to,be-finally passed be" -suspended--', that;;
'consideration and'.vote;be waived,; thatv:t
a -12.9 Acre `,Tract: of. Land from R1A - to R3
tion`Company,.located' south of.Highway 6
Sycamore Street bevoted upon`.for;final'`
Roll 'call: Ayes: ;Neuhauser, SelzerVe
Nays:; deprosse, -Perret. ; Motion "failed;
vote,was required)..Moved by�rostei and
that'the` ordinance -be considered an&;_'
age Roll call: -Ayes: .'Perretj';Selzer
deProsse, Neuhauser. Motion adopted,un
Moved by deProsse_and seconded,by F
`- 'tevise the'Amortization Schedul
Signs be considered,and:g.iv
en_:
ition of Councilman`_Salmer's `oor
raid Mayor.Neuhauser"requeste<
,a _'conflict of.;interest is:5. .Rc
.er,.Neuhauser,Selzer, _Veverd'
i` adopted; 6/1.._. -
After discussion; 'r+oved by ,vevf
t!
x
Page 4 Official Co
Ma
i
Moved by deProsse and seconded,byiPer
lution 76-130,%recorded
in`Res..,Book,--:3
salarie's and'Compensations`for-Classif
_Resolution No. 76-183,: and: Providing.for'V
Changes in`the Finance;Department.,;rBarbar
ember
Orchard Street, member,_of Rel"
preaenting,a,statement-regarding the Affir
for the City of"Iowa_City. Moved by.Perre
deprosse to receive and:file the statement
-aniinously t Rev:, Welsh'appeared for'di-, unc
Ayes:= deProsse,;.Foster,:Neuhiuser, P-,
erret
Selzer, Vevera. Resolution adopted/3
Moved`.by•deProsse and seconded by Pere
tion;No. 76-131,:, recorded An•Res. Bookr.35VI:
Street `Improvements-on'Woodside`Diive'soutl
•Addition.-Ro11.Calle Ayes deProsse., Fos
Selzer,. Vevera, .Balmer.:': Nays ' none:; :tResi
Moved -,,by -Balmer --and seconded by,selze�
tion No. .76 -132, -recorded in,Res. Sook 35,=;
:proving:Plans,.,Specifications;'-COntract'anf
the FY '77 -Slurry_ Project.- R611'.call',
" Neuhauser „'P erret,Selzer, Vevera,-,Balmer;y
none. ':'Resolution -adopted, 7/0. -
;
Moved by Foster and seconded by,Veveri
ion No. 76�433, xecorded'i in, .Res. ,Book5,
Approving Contract' for Legal Services -with''.
'in connection with the Urban Renewal -East
Ayes:',.NeuhaUser „,Perret,'Selzer, Vevera,<E
Foster:- Nays: none. Resolution adopted,`;i:
Moved by deProsse to adjourn tW meet9
Perret`. Roll_call:;Pe
,:;Ayes: rret,.:dePross
Selzer; Vevera, Balmer,.Neuhauser Motios;!
bT_ almer,;_and,seconded by Selzer tos'adjouz
sion to discuss litigation on'prban Rene"I
requested the City- -Attorney cite the.CodeS
for executive'session.:•A torney•Hayek read
of:the_-State Code.'_;Mayor`Neuhauser suggest
wlshed to be`_informed.•of;whW - taking�7pla
tact the,City.Attorney individually Ro11.
'
,to adjourn to executive sessions:' Ayes_ rSe
mer. :,Nays :.deProsse, Foster;;.Neuhauser,:'.-P
failed; 3/4. •Moved'by;Foster and seconded_:
_
--jou rnthe meeting :at 9:55 P M. =Motion adop
i
_
=Nays; none.
sae
N.
-SPECIAL COU
MAY -7 19;
1.00-A,�
ft
Y
INFORMAL COUNCIL DISCUSSION:
MAY 17,`-1976;_'
1:30 PM.
The Iowa city city Council ;met in,' nfornoal a
the 17th day of May, ;1976, at ,1 a 30 P.M j in :;the Co..
;.
Room at- the Civic'Center. Councilmembers.present '
hauser'-Vevera, deProsse,,'Halmer,.Foster, Ferret (1
Absent: Selzer.'._Staffinembers'present:-',Beslin, St
•r
COUNCIL TIME i +'
z�
Councilman Balmer `:aisked'if .the,,&� ioniconcex
sr .'should be'referreid-_to,Planniagtind Zoning:
a.short discussion; of -procedure: Concerning thej
of Muscatine,; City 'Manager Neal,;;Berlin-,advised that
information would-be'
available soon': the�Hic
mission will' -allow -0 Probably:temporary;�patching�;wj
this year... No time will be `opened . up. ;for the ;engx
because of'not
doing the Dubuque"Streetprojectfth9
problem will be trying 1:o,get it through ,DOT.-,, S601
`.probably not be acceptable..
Concerning the X=k funds ;the°City Manager, add
-Council would-':to,need addiltional=_information?.-' deal'i
issue. -such -as expenses.'to date, projected"expendi'
his` fiscal -year,:-`and he wouldhave ;,this.'informati�
the next two weeks., -' Regarding �paymentiofAHCDAvmon
City,::he pointed, out that the "City requisitions pa;
money: as it in needed._; The complications.•concerni:
`were;discussed. He cotmnented:that,,theY$400;000 am
not apply to:the first-year-'in'.which Iowa City was;
with'HCDA.
r {
Council discussed the
in
Council
received from the'iNational`Leaaue`of i.itoAtes
Washington,;; D.C.';on_•transit,.and s
discused_ifsanya
accompany her. 3f -she is representing,NLC,':they,'c
way is working on material<;for,Carc
Manager -advised that there is --pending_i n: the Gover
tions;Committee,=as=•it irelates: to;Feve ue^`sharia
meat ,Which conceivably. -could extend ;the.proy a one
Davis -Bacon Act,.which:governs she,rates paidjon°e
projects; to ail.`city_construction. ,Hemrecommended
strong_positionAn opposition.;== After�disaussion c
and it was, pointed; out that ahie 'cot idPcatise, a;=15�
{,crease in costs of construction, it;wis'.the e
genra
of; the Council that the, Manager could,'take:a posit
% this amendment; -" It-was,`'suggested that l_ Counci]
discuss this with'`the riublic.,Works`Director<<andcc
a
mentsA3#-,1#4p' #5`are ,;.revise
and . the four' assumptions' ii
that'in -plained i Attachment 3, -Line
reduced by.the amount ' -.cf'urban_ren
''Document. -:(The original amount pr
the*current:.estinuite of constructi
at forlimiting: or
_000, OOOL_ -int p
,'.at,some-pc
debt! limitation-..,` You'would
r -and F.Y..-80--and ,:on .byllg;l'L.,
tion_:pro
to'-, abide
an def e:
asking for City support on their:l
t on. -the City@s operating budget -shi
"Manager -,-advised ---that-:he .would ,have
end': of the week.' A: final ;report `c
would berwithin the next -60"d
ays"
Director -do not feel�.i.hat°the; voters -$2 9
Re -questioned if_^.the would"
of :"'the -pro ject was -.discussed;' -and='
was
-:concerning;the Federal'
-for the Pollution cntcrol guiidin„
plained that at:,the eletinq�V
being considered_;were"discussed.
requirements, other alterantivea?a
'will;require a new plant To'maini
'tend a trunk downriver,,'and_put;in:
costa, Auld be prohib,.itive:;in.;capj
hill in; Congress;would ip)i
but ', Would ='lengthen time period:_for`
. RxPansion ° of ,the;; present site- does':
-Mayor. also suggested ;l<ioking<`into a
Grants, and' for, revenuj okingi, , ''
Onthe budget appeal. =`The Finance;:
at:"the areas where there are•;;multip
be"a report:on the Library in'Ju-
document to be as:realistic ai3, o
"done .within -30 days. The projecoss
44/1'" R-14"`Etre is & a
Pedestrian; q'��Mwele=j
:`Jefferson •Bu ld n Vault --y �`
;'went; Pro_iQ� $258000 Repair:'Pro
Cit" ; g s : 1. arks Pag j
Y-Mana er'advised,that if..the Cot
44/hand 44/2, tot:include:it in: ;SL
$2 550,'000.was committed, it ---would t
,j'ected- property tax bases, as where'?.i
development. is comingin at :He,poi
renewals debt service ceilings even:'
renewal projects ;from the ,G. o; bond'
included: 'BCDA monies -can be:used`f,
struction,`15 million out .of.,
the -20;i
federally funded; ; could
yt-
of:;P
coull
disci
Univ
or
scion _of the Trunk Seweerr�-it�wai
rsity:had not-,agreeii;to the;i
ot; even''to
ce the reaerow process. new a
,of cooperation by ,the ,Universi
s =was 'to ;'eliminate' t:he Rider 'Cori
this Capital,Improvezaants Prograe
would>be.a potential` -in the-.
+ithin`the revenue area to::offaet
:oy be amG.O. Bond Issue. 'Or 'afte
r++v:: 1Jetween':2__,n4,11t _ .. •,,,-.