HomeMy WebLinkAbout1976-05-18 Bd Comm minutes�• -
MINUTES y
IOWA CITY.PLANNING AND ZONING„ COMMISSIONlf3't"? UYA a��it��t3,tyl(I
MAY.=6,
1976- 4t00 -P.M ;�
CIVIG�CENTER,000NCIL CHAMBERS ).„'f ^nct�:irz ,1{ss.•sa�st�{=:
4r a. 3
Jaliobsen Bl{mi Hifi�s;� IC hEme'
MEMBERS F'RESENT'J Ogesen, Cain, sen B 1 p1 ryrt,:.i s Ltsttts
Vetter > ; qn, j- 'ac 3 h�cvo 1 of ' ?
tis tr,3 7<, . r
_ :: .7 '7{t l�? i* ^f :l aid? ” �.i )1 •r: ) is r `y � Chili{'
STAFF PRESENT' Stc�tmeiser,` Boothro , O:
JO-TE-CITCAca0 :10x4
REgS. L1
-USI$ YtLfl!-� fr (Y'Oir ,I..) f'. [i f • S F} t
approve EZ, 7606, ,application submitted luIhtie� easte
for rezoning a tract of,land;'C1`Lo..2,.
g
First Avenue between Lower Muscatine Road andaHighway 6]
'tr+fSti,.3.3 '.j."%+ra -i i rF f'f;: adl,
Party rehm"ina 1771
20 ,,To, approve S „7606, Village Green, ;..
as,outhlof,:,V�llage, Roadand east, of Village VIVA
Grn,}rPrts41
5)
gent,;upon the, isubz it al oto the plat drawn zeo he S'C leei
_ �tE\
3. `To adopt the Ordinance amending the Subdlvisi0tl COdim SOt;
rkpreliminary.•plats,ltg_be drawn to:,thein
scale of�l'�nu?oxvaC
rt?_ifh i;.ia
ng parkingw
4. `To .adopt the ordinance revisiQ4r�fient5�_b.
Lfamily._sdwellings...t5 [. t ="Uj', l_s 4893SZ4
:,.7_1 J_ f1T(F -`j l{ 'i;r- �gs-,, -J �u
RE UESTS:TO,THE CITY MANAGER FOR INFORMA1tI01� OR STAFF ASSI§'
�'ir 2£•f'7 JfSS :iriC �9'{ 'attC. a+ ♦ n�tr•.. ft tYF 'fir.
F; Thatothe Leg al,,Department_be contacte t oWI
de etm �a tit
IsregardingFthelproposedrezoning oiiihre�.�5U2)tiSIhi
f.g-sector of, the, original:R3A Areatudy(Fo� �l.ir
C
lassification.
LIST_OF�MATTERS-,PENDING-COMMISSION-COUNCIL DISPOSITION > F
JC[feJ lty .. J. i; 1 K'..{ M 1 'tnR •t 'LF i'in � Oq.,
72-04. Board ,of3Adlustment*7Appeal�Amendmens.a�� tt1.5
•t3 i3rt rf {"' F'�)SCI ,t itfiltifeF
2, 3Pr73L7., Creation
fof,ahUniversitynZoneat(�)�d7 r6 d7 is
i:'.fS° L3?F-'-: J;{ .fi`•'Y nS%t.l) s ;.'i ��1 F•fl l"Jtt[)3:i G.t {3']�«OTiQ9'S
r
3,. P-7410. Creation oft alNbbleiHome11ReUi`den ssztt ,�1
{)31'Or .f t j , .�: 7lr Tj' ° J )3% i i7^•i'i'Sf })Rf 74iISt'
±4.a3.P,7,403.,�Rvis,ion,of.Ml an� M2�%ones.?} t zo��YT 9siy
. ,-: r -,_ ., 'D li•1 '.�e� _ic;b/i1'_uce: f.�3itkcq.ti��{{ba�i
,1,10 ": JIMIt,z{ U)A Yo f lCo{i aria
j;; t±a o� 3t8r2pagd Sdgxr.,
-''so8 ";
'!iE �, 1170 E31i?.�fli itt7 -tYY ( ,t i�T.f3t,3 Trig «7.ft3'�(`y3�13{•TJy Q(.
... T. 15 7.
,ii �fiil 3�Et3 a)'i. Nil
� - ,{, h-} ,.�. �{-.h'.ii�`�i;�w�.'•`'tLf ...�r.`7F _y?r...
t .: a. e,)�¢.., .d t� fir. `,Y'iF F e.... �... Ar t __ ,2 •.� � ..
1
„ :.Q {l.�ft [SIL"-V3Fs.iK iT
SUMMARY OF DISCUSSION AND FORMAL AtTIONSl TAKEFf
Acting as Chairperson, Commissioner Cain caI ed0tthe meetfiil
:.
and 'asked:, there; More any additions`0r correction's to the ; nute!
the meeting held an"APril`15; 1976: 'A'mbt'ion wg's'`in" 8e by_,, neN..175,
by.Jakobsen,'to approve the minutes as written "."�fhvl motion`carrI
unanimously. (Ogesen and Blum were not present when=the vote wasA
Mr—Bruce Glasgow requested that consideratioiliof.Z-!76B,'_&caiDiB i
East Addition,,iPart_1,-be�con-sidered in conjunction' with S-7609 an(
A 7601vand,rtherefore, the subject request' was1`iiov4m)'"down�oifthe'aj
t ;<= ,I�is:f.:19 77SiY- k'$jic,iibY.t;1(3,
If': `. �tr7.i t�33�W;fe Cj ^3ffliu YiS f2''
Z 7606.j Application for rezoning a tract of.land, CltoC2 [Local
of requested area is .along the east'side`of(First [Avenue befr7een
Muscatine Road'{and Highway 6 -BY -pass.
Appl%atio"'slibmitted'byf tiVfi'i
House Enterprises; ChariestMull'en, Attornei..'lrDaid`nle"d' r4%13/76;
45 -day limitation T S/28/76 r
_ < �.--.;,irjgob
Mr. Arnold Davidson, .partner. in White:Hduse=.Bnterprises,l'otSthTidfl?i
why the proposed change rto.a C2 Zone -would be desirable ke stata�.
a covenant had been'"signed }with;a"prospecti3e bir iryerYdi th'e`s'L51ect'
property.which;would guarantee against -the establisfiment-dSany[kii
of.automotive;business-.onnthe property.a; e' -stated th t thejprimaxj
need 'was for=more-floor space -and less -parking 5p ce. �1n.!Dav�d of
notedzthatthe,iBngineering.Division:was concerned;'about increasing'
traffic congestion,aE the intersedtibn df F`iTstrA0nuePafld`;Ldiei,Mi
tine Road 3rHe,;pointed out that y�wo
the Ciit{sld3noZ°alto {3add6 9B6W
First Avenue and.traffid-conge§tion Gould`, therefdre; hdt be iHOYei
at that location, ao��tt:13 i�ritl
Commissioner Cain s tatednth`at-the-Planning'-and-Zotiingit6iHssi3n�?m
consider all potential.uses,permitted in a.particular zone when dei
ozsoEi_- 'tri$
.whether or not to recommend' -the reion`ing�`of,`propeYty'.
Mr. Francis Hammond, prospective, buyer andrdeveloper.of the-subjec
property,, stated that.the'uses conteipi-Abd:weii reta$19lit es and<_tl
rezoning was requested -to' reduce parking requirements..."He ;'stated
there was no:;logic in keeping ,the area zoned`as Cleand'point
rout
there were only three areas coned C1_in the Cit i
t
Commissioner Hines indicated that the,subject�tract `seemed`spot zoi
and. noted that the property. is 'essentially' lncaiedTrd'n' ant"Arte"Yi3�al,r
Commissioner Jakobsen:pointed out the. possibility, of requesting ail
variance ''from the Board of Adjustment. Doni.Schmeiser, Senior Plani
stated': that it might "be -possible to obtain a:'fifty-percenV`reductfi
parking from the Board 'of, Adjustment Commissioner. Cain stated `thi
felt the parking requirements for commercial establisbments;shoula
revised but.notedthat the P$Z Commission generally: does not rezon
F�
z
v
-1
-3-
property as�ameans of circumventing parking requirei
__thatwas: somewhat bothered' that there='were'1noTyal
Fll.=..Y i+
fl C2 Zone 1.'•'a •:.. GI 7 IA{ - 11_
-.,St .t.( itiJ 2p:fi17.7.-
htr.'Sc�imeisex�poin ed out that the Cit'"St ffire'CommE
ordinance be adopted to amend the parking?requirement
establishments br dgesen stated'..thabtZ
an. interim {ordinahCe'because'Ite`corisii(e
it could'be::imp1E„mented ' Commissoner'Cain statedTth
an'interim'*brdinancell.& bein'gIr'elatively simple'"tb'tfi
not take a considerable' amount of �Yime:'
A motion was made by Jakobsen, seconded by .Hines, to,!
_
Cf, ty Council-'apprgWT- 6f -7606; 'app'lication siibmitYe
Enterprises `i'oft is ohing a' tract- of.Iland,' `ClY to C2 'a
side'of Fiisf Aveifna'betWeeii`' Lower'."Muscatine Fi6ad?aiid
Commissioner:Jakobsen stated that she would vote agai
be'cause2`she'�ifas opposed to'fand be"in ,gold•
�;-r B dontingefit'
CommiSs onbf Hines stateo:that a`. deCisiori'ivould h ye>3
potential V169 _pefmi,ttcd yin la C2' Zon"e .but felt a' Gl {Z
necessarily;; the hig}iestraridrbest fuse'?bf;tfieland :'Cliff
noted,,that thhe present ,C% Zone is almost an=unworkabli
widely, used He 's'afd he favored the ehange ao a` C2:17A
extens on Wt'he C2`xne'n Commi"ss totier'91inri stated?tl
_pfesenf'onirig; Htheepetit'iSner'rseemedspen`alYzebfby,=thi
t}ie'tonifig 6rdinance'And tiy''the`pecdl'ihe circtimsta4ce!
land, i.e. , site,,, shape andjlocation'.of the'iproperty's:
,,le:.r tij.
i]., di13?Qq'r
Mr. n Hattm�ond. agin pointed `out•/that&the )si"gnedf c_oVenan+
automotive.husiness "He saiaihethadilived:in,the-eofm
years and had'a'reputation�Wintegrity`to+maintain';``T::
F.iy.
The motion carried'6=1'with'Commissioner+-Jhkobseniwoti
.t -. J97T ,. t `yg ,•> L_ ,. I.sT 'lob j7'iSm?UR:7'f'�L
S 7606. Village Green;'P
art j7'� preliminary plaY�(vi<
.Road and east 'of Village Green, Par t!-5)4?9Subtdi"tteatby
Development_Co., Edward W. -Lucas, Attorney._ Date: ile
45 day -limitation 6/5/76
ttaU _-IiJ i i ?-air L ;ta. r r�! h .;, ! f•.` i?:!f I ndu2 v ilii, .
Mr`: gcktneise . hated 'that` the' discrepancies';noted "'unc10,i
Staff -Report had been _corrected irith;'tHeiexception =thb
i be"drawn to the scale of 1" = 100,
+I1
A motion wasp -made iiy'Caifi econd6 by Blft tb-` te'coM
Council approval of S-7606,`.Village;Green,'Part 7/!_pre
f (vie, south of: Village Road'alid east of Village3Green
contingent, upon the_submittal'of the:plat drawn;to_the
1" _ 100'. 'The' motion` carried unanimoi�sl 'r�Eu cJ ;112
I
A_'
-4-
S-.7607t And
oyer
S-,76071-;Andoyerf Garden.Apartmentsi Preli�mujaZio Vin'
large Scale Residential f)evelopment3(LSRD) Foca c'dnw
and South of Haywood Drive. Submitted _by Amerez'.Corj
L. Men rd -n Attorney c pate filed: 4 1 76 45. da li
i 1a'L3'3 .i:;QC ;J :•li "r♦ ilf /1/76 t3.t au y'.lr�
r :., "" ,: 3rtt {Ir7 ot[ rsti£t
Chairman Ogesen, explained ,that the City,Attotneyi;and{'
attorney,,gllltMeardon,:;had resolved that the app�lca
xsubmit .plans under ,the,,l arge Scale Residential!'Develo
requirements; for ;approval: by the- di"`' Ub •••
was required from the Plannin and 1?tete£ore,he
g , Zoning Comrtussion;
S-7609 t o�Y O ,: ft r It9r}ttf.�3? : r} r
Scott Boulevard, East Addition, Part �ilO'�rprel`'
Planned Area De' __-
ent;(PAp ''`y 1,1
of•,an eastern extensiOn,,o1.fr Court. Street). - ubmitt f
Date filed: 4J2/76; 4S-day
limitation."${jj�jj6 `
n y I 3
-. ` tit I .£+I= '11iS { 'I %i `T I 7�'F.1•iD t - ,�r
Z-7.G05, Scott Igoulevard, ,East Addiif6ri' }Fail
a tract o£fl,and, . _ A RIB (vie ,:east, o ScotY,Soulet
an-eastern extension,pftCourt Street. AJ'�icatioul
Glasgow•bate filed 4/2,76, ,45-da�� Pp
30-= - el -fA7� 3sifF� 2 Vliittl r. { y1.•11lgeta #on zBSJ��
A-76
,O1:, A s ?.Um11�,, z
u }.rectangular tract moasuring 79$r 1Ca
corporate ;limits,and outh`±of tan easierti eztensi n oca
This annexationy,to„be added onto ani becomes a' t sof`1
East Addition,iPart-1.`=Ip ,
r�Submittedibyj BruceiGlasgowq D,
tY.tt.Jlt
Mr. Bruce Glasow 4 rli �o-,.^r1J„;j jr ttrr zctr+{.`
g ,petitioner, submitted alternate;plai
requiret;cohsideration3as,.three}separate}butu,interrelatl
_ Planned Area Oevelopmentj -air equestt,forranne at on_ok
4 AV
to place the'.total'proposed;deyelopment�ivthin t}ie`�ity
request of the complete parcel of land from iLsexistlr
3 ... �. tu., 3
RIB. Mr. Glasgow: explained,{,that,hehad,submittedj`a�wa3
day limitation and requested deferral until'a dater P1,1
�.Commissioners:, concurred: that, consideration of
. t
deferred+until, 8 later} Pg$; meeting' s J f. tthahree
,<, r
V-7601: Vacation of alley-submitted by Home Town Dairii
alley'betweezi-iPr&irie:du;,Chien Road,, and St.-�Cle ents`.St�
North Dodge Street) n.Date; f31ed ,' 3/1/76 _,,. ,)” ts,,.St;
Sg
Chairman Ogesem.stated that no addition l.irifoimatiLea
and;tahereford ,2.consideration; of-,V-7601, would1be defe
PgZ Core
tnmissiQna meeting i 4
_
a "a s ^:? f,cz�� is .tto}'cts ionn�ogr,LtcV.
Consideration of an Ordinance, amending�the�1Sub
ndivison C
preliminary plats to be drawto the Cale
.... -=-
. r .4 a einn are. not Pd, th At the
detail to -be . j inc-I ud edI ini.th-il ... p 1 ats, and make "t
Commissi6ners also n6ted,th*iit Aevelopers seen
change,,in scale,.,_
-7be motion carried unanimously.
conssideration of an Ordinance revising parkil
family dwellings.
kmotion was made by,Hines,seconded-by Jakol
he adoption ofithe Ordinance.il
for two -family, -,dwellings., -3
X
CommissionerfBluin objected 1to.,'the,6rdInancC
I— . - -.11.2, � I I - — - WIT
opposed,,,to;compelling;PaTking n the"back"ya
and felt parking sh Id,.not-necessarily,be r
front or the back yard. In.generaf"--back.,ya
reas tA� said.. ,p �.J
recreat ionalla ,I.. 1 .1, !2 --, J1, Z ODsV
nv -,Z, Ot, tiH I 4:,.i
Commissioneri.Hinei,suggeslted,".that if-iie�'l
lJoc
Majornphilosophical;qVestioni-it)shoulTbea
Plan.' ChairmanOiesen _eipiiinedthat at: I
one
`-recommended_that�no-Rarking should.be allowe
- however, the City Council allowediliarkingAi
RIB t Zone 4 UDr4_-,Ogesen saidithat-beiause:tfie.
'the front yardyin;anjRIB.Zonef then I : Ihel� woui�
an-, Re u
yard' of
the front yard.
The motion to recommend the adoptionof.t.he,
Commissioner,-,.Blumlvoting�no,and,Commissione:
oo;
Consideration,of storm water retention ordii
by -r P6Z- Commi Ss ion Pres entation,'wai, made; V
Willis &,Associ
AMPA:
SIF11 -A-
that,corisid
.:!�)nXommissioner,.Jakobsen. suggested
- ' - - - - I
retention :ordinance ihe.ne
(May 18) an.d,suggested that the Atem be pla
agenda,.; - Commissioners taskedthatj,Dick FIas
e.:•In'vited�Xq, the., &y 18th, meeting'..
f
AAF
A140
I ___
ft
A motion wasrmade-by' `hium; secondea by'Jakob3
--times" for ,the`''P6Z .1
commission meeting to tho f
7<.
Pormal�P$Z,meetings Alstzand'.
hnforma-PCZ;ineetings n rthe Moni
formal.4
-r n"TO 33vV4 j@
The new schedule would begin with.the June,31
informal meeting will be rescheduled due -to
Commissioners were hopeful that the new schei
citizenf parzticipation., "ri .{ri-i; iv9z v
The motion carried unanimously.
to ''rT2 .•'+'[ ])'It F.. r{ r.aaf.>..',r.n q'rt —. r,
A motion was ma oe by"lh um and seconded by Ja'
remove from the pending list the rezoning'.of
northern sector,.of the original R3AArea Stu
Blum {stated ;that iin,alf fdmess ro'^te jpeop
Area Study, some actibA
6 should bc.take
A motion was :made by Blum; seconded',by H
P$Z Commission meeting,(Mayry20) the-moti
,vfromithe pretiing.,list:. the _reionirig oZtfi
sector of the original RSA Area Study (Z
r rl,u,� l , ten... ls7 ono rn7r,rt�-n
unanmoust
±f; 't -!} 31!, - it L9•h').i£. 3rr ari.J
lt6.OF j {i 6•—i rrn .. -�, jr '-,f.-.
Commissioners,,requestetiieF,City, $taff;t
to determine�their„opi'nton tigarding thi
areas'.in the nbrthern{sectbr of'the`oriF
a higher classification.
Commissiotlers requested'that Chairfnan 0�
Council to urge prompt consideration of
- 31r s:1 i.• ca na.i rno:
Chairman bgesen 3nvited;tomuiiss3on_ers K
on'the voluntaryComprehensive Plan C06
explained -that a public meeting wouldrb
at i Ol p� m• am th,Councili Char 6ers l tbbl
{-°,j-,y r.'
Mr..:`9chmeiser. suggested that i`h Cbmmi
discuss the revision of the Ml and'Mi>"I
scheduled;a_special meeting to beheld!
the City Manager's' Conference Room'.to'd
The meeting adjourned.
-Z
Y
A I
determine what should ha
ppen, to money.
Ing.,
their.project ideas.Unfinanced:trograms�woulld
second priority. -,�.recei.v,e
2. To facil'
itate'the establishment Of services monitor.
3- To help citizen groups articulate. -,proposals `t`
4.
r s,.,-''4. To explore the feasib i1i ty o I f
a
Corporation. Development
-Dennis explained thatthe Community DeveloixnentCorporation1 wa
--"
organization staffed by 1 City staff which could:utilij -i
. - , - -e -ski ,llsof
Iowa City citizens to carry on activities-.that:.City, would .no
hire outside Contractors, arch't
i ects cOnsultants,,e_tc*,,;, �d
'would be-capableOfearning money-l'to'support ;itself �,(n6n�-r"-- i
City may -contribute funds to it,.:,
Janiuk withdrew earlier motion -and added
a speaker from the Small Business:Administ' i
:Moines,;'::
Iowa, to explain the,CcmmunitysDevelopment ion and .
..
Committee members extend invi6ti-o-n to'.int. .... . .
'
-
to.attend this presentation. ...Hall -second
was passed unanimously.. Dennis will arrange:: ozhave`,,this speakez
Dennis gave a summary of his meeting with CleoMarsolais Directs
-the DepartmentofSocial Services. They' had conclWe&'e, - ,
follow
1. there is a need
for more volunteers for the elderly
2, training%of these volunteers -:,could :be.donq',; - by. "sensor cit
3. the information center:should.be expanded -
4. a senior citizen 1
iason should be established between-.'th
'Department of Social Services and
Carol Munn was appointed.- the Council �bh'.J.A
Hauer questioned how a
sub-comittee-re'connehda'tio'n-',-sh'ou�l...
Bolnick'm ' otioned:that all of thesub-committees--sh6LA& , hav6 act . ia,
proposals in relationship
9 to the public', that are tdlber
Council or other -organizations'ten-.1, approved - by, the Com''i itie
ou'
'These -actions should 4z- . - - . -nction " 1. .
be in written conjunction Or,
-presentation. This motion was sec6nded'by:Stockninand �
unanimously. was�passec
--,Hauer, on behalf of the Rehabilitation sub7committqe,",.'d'is'c-u-s*s'e'd�--tI
..meeting. .She -stated -they had talked aboutzthe'Housi
:proposals. -concerning rehabilitation to a)�' a ifml
upgr d propel
and housing codes,,and b) -allOw-jent" �&,�
withholdingtil
code
3