HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda_Steering Comm Mtg 9-21Steering Committee of the Iowa City Climate Action and Adaptation Plan
Thursday, September 21, 2017, 10 a.m. – 12 p.m.
Emma J. Harvat Hall,
Iowa City City Hall
410 E. Washington Street
Meeting #3 Agenda:
1. Call to Order
2. Approval of Meeting Minutes - August 10, 2017
3. Recap - 10 minutes
4. Review Vision Statement - 15 minutes
5. Identify Broad Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies - 80 minutes
6. Review Community Engagement Tools - 10 minutes
7. Other
8. Upcoming Dates:
i. Thursday October 12 from 10:00 a.m. to 11:00 a.m.
Online Webinar Steering Committee Meeting - newly added, attend if you can!
(Purpose: To discuss preparing strategies for public review at Community Mtg.)
ii. Thursday November 2 at 6:00 p.m.
Community Meeting
Iowa City Public Library, Meeting Room A
iii. Thursday December 7 from 10:00 a.m. to noon
Steering Committee Meeting, City Hall
9. Adjourn – 12:00 p.m.
If you will need disability-related accommodations in order to participate in this meeting, please contact
Brenda Nations, Sustainability Coordinator, at 319-356-6161 or at brenda-nations@iowa-city.org. Early
requests are strongly encouraged to allow sufficient time to meet your access needs.
Meeting Minutes
Steering Committee of the Iowa City Climate Action and Adaptation Plan
Thursday, August 10, 2017, 10 a.m. – 12 p.m.
Emma J. Harvat Hall Iowa City City Hall
410 E. Washington Street
Members in Attendance: Members Absent:
Ingrid Anderson Melissa Jensen
Eden Dewald Jesse Leckband
John Fraser
GT Karr City Staff Present:
Matt Krieger Brenda Nations, Sustainability Coordinator
Martha Norbeck Ashley Monroe, Assistant City Manager
Anne Russett
Katie Sarsfield
Ryan Sempf Consultants Present:
Charles Stanier Lindy Wordlaw, Elevate Energy
Eric Tate Bill Haas, Inova Energy
Others Present:
Dylan Cook, Iowa City Sustainability Intern in audience. Sign-in sheet collected. No comments from
audience.
1. Call to Order
Meeting called to order at 10:00 a.m. by Ingrid Anderson, Chairperson.
2. Introductions and Project Updates
Bill Haas, of Inova Energy introduced himself. Charlie Stainer introduced himself to the Committee.
Group reviewed introductions.
a. Goals for the day’s meeting
Lindy Wordlaw, of Elevate Energy, gave an overview of the committee meeting agenda.
b. Communication Rules and Basecamp Review
Eleanor Dilkes, Iowa City City Attorney, provided a brief overview of the Open Meetings Act. This
Committee was appointed by City Council, therefore holding public meetings; must make sure
that minutes are taken, public notice given with more than 24 hours notice. Dilkes explained the
process City staff uses for communicating with Council. She clarified that two members can have
a conversation but more risk of violation as more people become involved. Brenda Nations
clarified that public records apply to the consultant and chairperson as well, and applies to
personal emails between members. Martha Norbeck asked how many people can meet? Dilkes
responded that based on the quorum requirement for the Steering Committee, up to six
members can meet at one time. Matt Krieger asked whether the number of meetings should
increase. Wordlaw responded that now that the Committee knows rules will operate within
them. Ashley Monroe said staff will do their best to provide any comments and responses back
to Committee as a package as soon as feasible, with any responses going back again through
staff. Anne Russett asked if OMA applies to community meetings held for this purpose and
Dilkes confirmed that the meetings will be noticed.
c. Stakeholder Interview Recap
Wordlaw recapped the City department interviews and noted the planned Community
Stakeholder groups. (attached presentation slides) She confirmed that Krieger’s list of
suggestions is not on the list and noted School District not on the stakeholder list. She said that
they may need to be added and will look for Krieger’s list to compare the two. John Fraser was
concerned that the groups identified are all friendly to this cause and would like to see all kinds
of groups communicated with to see what common goals we have. He suggested ask and learn
from them, see what they believe and engage in solutions. Fraser shared a story about who
would be resistant to ideas and who is friendly; suggested the group should seek opinions.
Wordlaw confirmed that interviews ask opinions of the groups and the consultants try to steer
clear of assumptions about what the groups will say before they’re spoken with; she invited
Committee Members to participate in the stakeholder meetings if they have interest. Norbeck
wanted to identify the biggest changemakers, said affiliations don't matter. This group needs to
get to the decision-makers and those that have impact. Stanier and Krieger agreed.
Nations identified large contributors to environmental conditions other than the contribution
from the City’s Landfill and cited the University of Iowa, residents, and transportation.
d. Document Review
Wordlaw reviewed documents Elevate examined. Stanier indicated ICCSD and University plans
could be helpful as well. Krieger said might be worth re-interviewing staff on impacts coming
from recent Board of Regent changes. Fraser asked the group to think about the end goal for
City Council and how the City will enforce implementation. Nations explained that the City
cannot force others to make changes but is one of the reasons for Steering Committee
appointments. Monroe identified the issues and projects becoming part of the City’s budget
process. Nations added that the City can add policy.
Stanier commented that adaptation or mitigation should be decided. Not only are the topics too
broad but it becomes a difficult communication issue and people have a difference in ideas
about how to address. He said the group should discuss how they go about this and be careful
to talk about the ideas separately. Haas agreed with the comments but the consultant team is
broadly speaking at this time and gathering information. A strategy for communications with
agencies will be determined based upon the swing between adaption/mitigation. Ryan Sempf
said that adding regulations on new businesses could hurt the end goal and deter people from
wanting to participate. Katie Sarsfield asked if a list of available incentives exists for Iowa City.
She used an example for MidAmerican providing rebates for lighting improvements at P&G. The
group generally agreed that it might be a good idea to pull one together and use for presenting
and getting buy in at companies/organizations. Haas said that they will pull together resources
for opportunities and put into the plan. Krieger talked about the lifetime expectancy of
resources and programs or whether programs will be expiring. He explained that the
information given in the plan should communicate this information.
Chairperson Anderson asked that the Committee send ideas for stakeholders, documents to
review, to Lindy. She expounded that there are two pieces to engagement, including defining
who needs to be talked to and what their concerns are. Then, this group puts together a plan
and goes back and sells it. The group must be clear on what they want to do and get from the
community meetings. Norbeck asked about meeting with Environmental Advocates. She would
like to coordinate a meeting amongst those groups, with interest, skills, and resources to
contribute to the community as an (umbrella organization). Wordlaw said she would follow up.
3. Community Engagement
a. Selection of Community Meeting Dates
Committee poll resulted in a few dates in late October, early November being available.
November 2 was selected as the best fall date. Norbeck suggested identifying whether small
group work will be needed and reserve breakout rooms to supplement. Nations will check
availability of rooms B and C. April 26 was selected as the Spring 2018 community meeting.
b. Community Engagement Plan
Wordlaw reviewed sections of the Strategy, identifying it as a living document. Sarsfield would
like a draft and action plan for engagement and a plan to assist Committee Members as they
present at public meetings. She wants to see dates and deliverables. Wordlaw said that this
effort will be supported with materials from Elevate. Fraser would like materials for Rotary
presentation. Stanier said he wants to see a detailed list of to-dos for each person outlined.
Consultants said they will expand on more detail. Stanier commented that more might have
been bitten off than can chew. Cited consultant document, what City can do, incentive
programs, must have enough people and buy-in to sell to major groups. Nations responded that
the City wants to try. Haas said that it is difficult but doable. Monroe commented that ideas are
taking shape for a media package for Committee members to share with the community and
organization audiences. It was confirmed that the next agenda will consist of meeting planning
and strategy prioritization. Someone commented that examples for interacting with a business
would be good to have. Wordlaw noted that the City Manager's Roundtable meeting will be on
October 4 and asked for one or two Members to consider attending. Russett requested
clarification between difference stakeholder interviews and the community meetings.
4. Break
No formal break held.
5. Vision Statement
Fraser requested a more formal statement background - why we are undergoing this effort. Haas
transitioned to the Vision Statement section of the agenda and explained that the consultant team will
be formulating several draft vision statements for revision and approval by the Committee. These drafts
will be based upon suggestions of concepts or ideas that should be present in the Committee’s vision for
the plan. Haas read Iowa Energy Plan vision and asked for statements. He took suggestions from the
group, including the following:
Fraser - sustainable economic growth
Stainer - attract investment, foster growth
Monroe - equitable and sustainable community
Norbeck - promote resilience and diversity (in all forms)
Dewald - urgency/need to act now
Fraser - future generations
Nations - innovation
Russett - community support and buy-in
Stainer - partnerships
Fraser - grass roots at local
Norbeck - personal committment/engagement
Stanier - planning, engineering, risk avoidance (environmental stresses) not reactive
Norbeck - prepared for community
Dewald - floods (to be specific to Iowa City)
Fraser – “What's in it for me?”
Haas asked what ideas should be at the top of the priority/first in the discussion. Sarsfield said it should
begin with all-inclusive. Krieger said resiliency. Tate asked if mitigation or adaptation most important to
the group. Nations responded that the plan needs to strive for 50/50 for now. Community needs to be
aware of adaptation part, regardless. Tate said need a balance of involved community people. Fraser
said that people need to see this as doable, not a dream; make it be known that it is feasible and a major
investment to overcome. This group should lay aside (people’s) fears by showing it’s doable.
Tate prefers equitable and livable ideas. Sempf stated that the vision not focus on adaptation piece at
beginning because the money to fix the issues won't come. Haas clarified that a good vision statement
should be crafted in a way that it encompasses both adaptation and mitigation in a neutral way.
6. Evaluation Criteria
Haas briefed the group on evaluation criteria and asked for some examples from the Committee of filters
the plan could use. The following statements were made:
Low/med/high
cost
ease of implementation
accessibility
household transportation/reduction in hh costs
business impacts
ROI
carbon cost (as part of ROI)
disproportionate household costs
geographic concentration of costs
increase in regulation/tax/growth in government involvement
timeliness/time
foster innovation
partnerships between agencies
multiplier benefit/co-benefits
priorities
unintended consequences
Air quality
health benefits
demographics and geography
decision-making ability, timing of involvement
Fraser said that it should be universal/duplicative. Norbeck disagreed and wants Iowa City’s plan to be
individualized to Iowa City. She also suggested a filter of “ability and will to implement.”
Stanier would like to see the full list of criteria with the other ideas that can be evaluated as the group
goes through the process. The group agreed upon a desire to see if there is a cost breakout for some of
the initiatives.
7. Meeting Recap
Wordlaw said at the next meeting the group will review this synthesized list and narrow it down with
the Committee. Anderson reminded Members to send suggestions to Wordlaw about stakeholders, and
feedback to Norbeck for thoughts on environmental groups. A list of deliverables will come from
Elevate, a vision statement, evaluation criteria, presentation ideas/materials are all expected
shortly. Krieger’s stakeholder list should be included in the full list. Anderson requested that all planned
meeting appearances are communicated to her to ensure that the Committee knows which groups are
being engaged. The information being given out at those meetings will be tied to the timing of when
meetings take place.
8. Adjourn
Meeting Adjourned at 12:02 p.m.
City of Iowa City
Climate Action and Adaptation Plan
Vision Statement
Iowa City will take action to embrace opportunities, address challenges and respond to the realities of
climate change. Our efforts will reach our entire community – our people, our businesses and our
municipality. Our strategies will be proactive and collaborative; using community engagement, local
partnerships and technological advancements to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Our actions will
result in a more livable, equitable and resilient Iowa City for all people today, and the generations of
tomorrow.
Primary Themes from Vision Statement Group Exercise:
Sustainable economic growth
Reduce GHG
Attract investment and foster growth
Equitable and livable community
What’s in it for me?
Promote resilience
Diversity (human and bio)
Emphasize need to act now
Future generations
Innovation
Community supports buy-in
Proactive and prepared
Specific language flood
Partnerships
Grassroots local
Personal engagement/commit
Risk management—planning, engineering, etc
Adapt
Steering Committee of the Iowa City Climate Action and Adaptation Plan
Notes and Instructions for Review of Strategies
Introduction
You’ve received the meeting invitation and agenda for next week’s Steering Committee Meeting, and
you may have noticed a very large portion of that meeting will be devoted to discussing potential
strategies for the Iowa City Climate Action and Adaptation Plan. Attached is a list of potential strategies,
based on best practices and strategies among climate plans across the country. (We’ve provided the
document in excel and PDF so that you may choose to read in a version that best suits you.)
Please keep in mind that these strategies as they are presented right now are meant to be broad, with
the initial goal being to provide a basic description and not the specific tasks one might expect to see in
a final plan for implementation. Further, the list as it is now might not include all of the strategies that
will end up in the plan, nor will all of these necessarily end up in the plan. It is for discussions purposes.
Finally, the strategies do not yet include some key policy strategies—we can discuss these ideas later.
The City has been clear that they have the resources and the ability to go deeper into policy ideas, but
prefers to come to agreement on the broader scope first.
Each strategy includes the following information:
A brief description
The sector(s) for which emissions are affected
Evaluation criteria (These are currently expressed in high level review and not specific numbers.
Please be sure to see the end notes on Cost, Return on Investment and Equity)
Implementation Possibilities (Specific partners for implementation and strategy rollout are not
currently identified and would come at a later time)
Instructions
For next Thursday we ask that you please review these strategies so that you have a basic understanding
of them (no extra research needed) and come prepared to discuss the following:
Provide input on each strategy by way of: “Yay” or “Nay” or “Yes, but modify”
Additions to this potential list of strategies (Note: Don’t worry about providing this same level of
analysis. Perfect for this discussion right now is simply “I think we should add a strategy about)
______________.”
Next Steps
You may be wondering what’s next after this step, and how does the discussion planned for next
Thursday fit into the planning process. Here are the next steps involving the strategies discussed after
next week’s meeting:
1. Make the strategies local (When: In between meetings)
Identifying ways to make the strategies applicable (and local) for implementation in
Iowa City through a guided exercise (in between meetings by volunteers from Steering
Committee; Consultants; Staff)
2. Discuss presentation of strategies to community (When: 10/12 online webinar meeting)
Discuss how strategies will be presented at the 11/2 Community Meeting
3. Presentation of strategies to community (When: 11/2 Community Meeting)
Gathering input and prioritization from community at 11/2 Community Meeting and via
survey to stay open for period of time after the meeting
If you have any questions on how to prepare before Thursday, please do not hesitate to reach out to me
via email or at the number below. Thank you for your continued commitment to serve as a Steering
Committee member!
Best,
Lindy
Lindy Wordlaw, AICP | Elevate Energy | 773-269-4012
Senior Manager, Public Sector Programs
322 S. Green Street, Suite 300
Chicago, Illinois 60607
Best Practice Climate Strategies DRAFT September 13, 2017
Category Strategy Description Residential Commercial Industrial Municipal Transportation Waste
GHG Reduction
Potential (Will
depend on
scale of
deployment)Timing Cost1 ROI2 Feasibility Advances Equity3?
Related Iowa City
Programs Implementation4 Examples Notes
Energy
Energy Efficiency and
Conservation
Create or scale
programs for smarter
and less wasteful energy
use. X X X X Large Medium Medium High High
Yes, if deployed to
communities in
need.
Iowa City Housing
Rehabilitation Energy
Efficiency Program
(http://www8.iowa-
city.org/weblink/0/doc/1
549320/Electronic.aspx)
http://www8.iowa-
city.org/weblink/0/doc/1549320/Electro
nic.aspx
Energy On-site Renewables
Catalyze the
development of
renewable energy that
will be generated and
used at the same site.X X X X Medium Medium Medium Medium High
Yes, if LMI
communities
receive associated
training, jobs, and
opportunities to
purchase
subsidized
renewables. Unknown
Champaign-Urbana residential group
solar buy:
http://www.growsolar.org/solar-urbana-
champaign/solar-urbana-champaign/
Iowa City officials
expressed their
continued interest in
geothermal energy.
Energy Community Renewables
Support the
development of local
renewable electricity
that offsite individuals
and institutions can
purchase.X X X X Medium Medium Medium Medium High
Yes, enables
participation from
renters and low
income
households.Unknown
https://cleantechnica.com/2017/07/07/
minnesotas-community-solar-program-
best/
Energy
Renewable Electricity
Supply
Help Mid-American
Energy meet its goal of
100% renewable
electricity.X X X X Large Short Medium Medium High No.Unknown
Farmers Electric Co-op in Frytown to
Install Largest Solar Field in Iowa:
http://www.iowaenergycenter.org/farm
ers-electric-co-op-frytown-install-largest-
solar-field-iowa/
Discuss Mid-American
plans and GHG
accounting.
Energy Electrification
Shift from sources such
as natural gas to
electricity which can be
generated by
renewables.X X X X Medium Long High Low No.Unknown
https://cleantechnica.com/2016/05/23/f
uel-switching-essential-step-towards-
decarbonized-future/
Goal is to replace natural
gas (reduces emissions if
paired with clean
electricity).
Energy Landfill Methane Energy
Use methane gas from
landfills for electricity
and heat generation.X Large Medium Low Medium High No.
Methane Gas used to
heat University Research
Campus:
https://iowaenvironment
alfocus.wordpress.com/2
011/02/28/university-of-
iowa-iowa-city-to-use-
landfill-methane-for-
energy/
Toronto's Gas to Electricity Program:
http://www.c40.org/case_studies/trash-
to-cash-methane-capture-generates-3-4-
million-annually Now flaring
Energy Net Zero Buildings
Adopt incentives and
building codes that
promote net zero
retrofits and
construction.X X X X Medium Long Medium Medium High No.Unknown
Net Zero Energy Communities: Three
Cities Leading the
Way:http://aceee.org/files/proceedings/
2016/data/papers/10_1034.pdf Net
Zero Building in Fairfield Iowa
http://earthtechling.com/2012/05/net-
zero-is-bliss-at-maharishi-university-in-
iowa/
Evaluation CriteriaSector Emissions Affected Implementation Possibilities
Energy Renewable Natural Gas
Utilize gas from
livestock operations,
wastewater treatment,
or biomass for fuel.X X X X X Medium Long High Medium Medium No.
University of Iowa and
Quaker Oats partnership:
https://www.facilities.uio
wa.edu/uem/renewable-
energy/biomassfuelprojec
t.pdf; Biomass Use at UI
Power Plants
https://sustainability.uio
wa.edu/initiatives/biomas
Janesville Wastewater Treatment Plant,
Janesville, WI: http://biocng.us/wp-
content/uploads/2015/06/Janesville-Fact-
Sheet-2015.pdf Fair
Oaks Dairy Manure Fuel Farming
http://fortune.com/fair-oaks-dairy-
manure-fuel-farming/
Energy
Water Efficiency and
Conservation
Reduce demand for
potable water--and its
associated energy use--
through efficiency,
conservation, reuse and
rainwater capture.X Short Medium Medium High
Yes, if applied to
LMI households. Unknown.
https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/fi
les/2016-
12/documents/wc_best_practices_to_av
oid_supply_expansion_2016_508.pdf
Transportation
Bicycle and Pedestrian
Infrastructure
Increase the number
and connectivity of bike
routes, sidewalks, and
other infrastructure,
such as secure bike
storage.X Small Short Medium Medium Medium Yes.
Several- see new bike
plan.
Davis, California:
http://cityofdavis.org/city-hall/public-
works/bike-pedestrian-program/bike-
plans
https://www.wired.com/2009/05/what-
makes-a-city-bike-friendly-ask-davis-
california/
Transportation Bike Sharing
Implement a user
friendly, short-term bike
rental program.X Small Short Medium Medium Medium
Yes, if priced and
sited
appropriately and
potentially
subsidized for LMI
households.
Bike Share Program in the
works:
http://www.thegazette.c
om/subject/news/govern
ment/local/newstrack-
university-of-iowa-iowa-
city-bike-share-program-
slowly-moves-toward-
reality-20160829
Des Moines- Bcycle
https://desmoines.bcycle.com/
Ann Arbor- ArborBike:
http://www.arborbike.org/about.html
RFP was due 9/2016.
Joint city-UI bike share
program is scheduled to
roll out in 2017.
Transportation Car Sharing
Provide alternatives to
car ownership and ease
congestion by
encouraging car sharing.X Medium Short Low High High
Yes, if priced sited
appropriately and
potentially
subsidized for LMI
households.
Zipcar currently has spots
downtown and on the
university campus.
City of Loveland Shared Motor Pool:
http://www.sustainablecitiesinstitute.or
g/Documents/SCI/Case_Study/CaseStudy
_Colorado%20Public%20WorksJournal_L
oveland_Enterprise_2013.pdf
Transportation Ride Sharing
Encourage the use of
car pools or ride sharing
services as alternatives
to driving alone,
including carpool
versions of ridehailing. X Medium Short Low High Medium
Possibly, if car
ownership burden
can be reduced,
costs to users are
low, and ride
sharing programs
provide living
wages.
University of Iowa
Employee Van Pool
Program: Groups of 7 –
15 employees with
similar work schedules
share a ride to and from
work in a university-
owned van. One person
volunteers to drive and
the others pay a monthly
fee to cover operating
expenses. Monthly fees
can also be payroll
deducted on a pre-tax
basis.
Cities Use Cash to Encourage Carpooling:
http://www.npr.org/2009/11/23/120676
315/cities-use-cash-to-encourage-
carpooling General best practices:
https://www.bestworkplaces.org/pdf/ca
rpool_June07.pdf
Emissions benefits
greatest if replacing solo
driving of fossil-fuel
autos.
Transportation Commuter Solutions
Adopt policies and
incentives that
encourage climate
neutral or low emission
options for traveling to
work and school.X Small Short Low High Medium
Yes, if LMI areas
are served.
University of Iowa
Commuter Programs
(https://transportation.ui
owa.edu/sites/transporta
tion.uiowa.edu/files/wysi
wyg_uploads/facultystaff
commuterprograms2017
_digitalformat_pdf_004.p
df)
Louisville, Co First and Final Mile Study:
http://commutingsolutions.org/us-36-
projects/us-36-first-and-final-mile-study/
Transportation Parking Policies
Align parking policies
with climate goals,
including pricing,
parking minimums, and
employer parking
benefits.X Small Short Low Medium Medium
Yes, can provide
benefit to low-
income, non-auto
households if
designed well.Unknown
The High Cost of Free Parking:
http://www.businesswire.com/news/ho
me/20110621007031/en/High-Cost-Free-
Parking
Transportation Transit
Bolster mass transit
systems and incentivize
their use through low or
free fares.X Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium
Yes, when passes
and availability
are designed well.
Bus Rapid Transit in Grand Rapids, MI:
http://www.therapidian.org/rapid-
reports-increased-services-success-silver-
line
Transportation Inter-city Rail
Encourage investment
in inter-city rail
networks that connect
Iowa City with popular
regional destinations.X Small Long High Medium Low
Possibly, it
depends on
pricing.
There was an exploration
of rail between Chicago
and Iowa City but it
seems to have stalled out.
Southeast Michigan (see Tier 4: Regional
Transit):
file:///C:/Users/ecorrado/Downloads/Im
provingTransitInSoutheastMichiganAFra
meworkForActionOctober2001.pdf
Transportation
Electric and Green
Vehicles
Encourage local EV and
Green Vehicle
ownership through
incentives, education,
and infrastructure.X Large Medium High Medium High
To an extent.
Accessible, public
charging stations
can help, but
mainly for middle
income
households who
can afford Evs.
Per stakeholder
interview, EVs were
evaluated as an option
and determined to be not
cost effective for city
fleets.
2017 City of Portland Electric Vehicle
Strategy:
https://www.portlandoregon.gov/bps/ar
ticle/619275
Transportation Location Efficiency
Adopt and enforce
strategies that reduce
transportation needs
with compact, mixed-
use, transit-oriented
and walkable
neighborhoods. X Large Long Low High High
Yes, especially if
exclusionary
maximum density
rules are
overhauled.
Iowa City has adopted a
complete streets policy:
http://www8.iowa-
city.org/weblink/0/doc/1
547106/Electronic.aspx
Portland "20 Minute Neighborhoods"
http://www.portlandonline.com/portlan
dplan/index.cfm?a=288098&c=52256
Transportation Transit Passes
Improve transit pricing
and payment
convenience to make it
a first choice for
workers, students, and
visitors.X Small Short Medium Medium Medium Yes.
UI student discounted bus
pass program for non-
parking permit holders:
https://transportation.uio
wa.edu/student-u-pass-
program
Free Transit Pass Programs for Youth
Could Help Fight Climate Change
http://www.transformca.org/trblogpost/
getting-youth-transit-cuts-climate-
pollution-entire-generation
Transportation Renewable Fuels
Incentivize the use of
renewable fuels, such as
green diesel.X Medium Medium High Low Low No.Unknown
Chicago Park District Powers its Vehicle
Fleet By Turning Cooking Oil into
Biodiesel Fuel
http://chicagocleancities.org/chicago-
park-district-powers-vehicle-fleet-
turning-cooking-oil-biodiesel-fuel/
Transportation Local Goods
Promote local
production and
consumption of local
goods to reduce goods
transport. X Small Short Low Medium High
Yes, if focused on
promoting
disadvantaged
businesses and
addressing access
issues like food
deserts.Unknown https://sfmade.org/
Transportation
Non-Fossil Fuel Goods
Delivery
Incentivize non -fossil
fuel modes for delivery
of goods, such as bicycle
cargo and electric
delivery trucks. X Medium Medium Medium Low Medium No.Unknown
Bicycle delivery
http://www.supplychaindive.com/news/
dhl-cycle-mobility-last-mile-urban-
delivery-cubicycle/437271/ and other
last mile solutions
http://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/mc
kinsey/industries/travel%20transport%2
0and%20logistics/our%20insights/how%
20customer%20demands%20are%20res
haping%20last%20mile%20delivery/parc
el_delivery_the_future_of_last_mile.ash
x
Waste Zero Waste
Divert waste from
landfills to be reused,
recycled, or composted.X Medium Medium Low Medium High
Could reduce
environmental
burden on LMI.
Curbside food waste,
ewaste, and hazardous
waste.
San Francisco, Zero Waste:
https://www.epa.gov/transforming-
waste-tool/zero-waste-case-study-san-
francisco
Waste Building Deconstruction
Reuse or recycle
materials from buildings
that are being
deconstructed.X Small Short Medium Low Medium
Could reduce
environmental
burden on LMI.
The Salvage Barn, Habitat
ReStore, etc.
Cook County Demolition Debris
Diversion Program:
http://www.sustainable-
chicago.com/2014/06/25/recycling-our-
cities-cook-countys-demolition-debris-
diversion-program/
https://www.cookcountyil.gov/news/co
unty-efforts-recycling-building-materials-
surpass-half-million-ton-mark
Waste Composting
Compost food waste to
divert it from landfills.X Small Short Medium Medium High
Could reduce
environmental
burden on LMI.
Launched residential
kitchen waste composting
this year. Landfill has a
commercial composting
facility, lower tip fee than
for waste.
https://www.icgov.org/co
mmercialorganics
San Francisco:
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/ne
ws/2013/06/130618-food-waste-
composting-nyc-san-francisco/
Comprehensive Best Practices:
http://www.foodscrapsrecovery.com/EP
A_FoodWasteReport_EI_Region5_v11_Fi
nal.pdf
Waste Packaging Reduction
Reduce reliance on
packaging materials and
create systems for
material reuse or
recycling.X Small Short Low Medium High
Could reduce
environmental
burden on LMI.
Ban on cardboard in
landfills takes effect in
2018 (required to be
composted). Single
stream/curbside recycling
(no glass) mandated at 4+
unit multi family
buildings. Plastic bag ban
didn't pass.
San Francisco- Food Service Waste
Reduction Ordinance
https://sfenvironment.org/food-service-
waste-reduction-ordinance-2007-
requirements-food-vendors-restaurants
Adaptation Tree Canopy Expansion
Reduce stormwater
runoff and ease health
problems associated
with extreme heat by
increasing tree cover.X X X X Small Long Medium Medium Medium
Yes, heat wave
related relief,
especially if
implemented in
LMI
neighborhoods.Unknown
Ann Arbor:
https://www.michigan.gov/documents/
mdch/Final_January_2014_HIA_446372_
7.pdf
Adaptation Green Infrastructure
Design water
management to use
methods that restore or
resemble natural water
systems.X X X X X Small Long Medium Medium Medium
Yes, if flooding is
reduced in LMI
areas.
Riverfront Crossings Park
and the return of flood
zone areas to
wetlands/open space.
https://www.epa.gov/arc-
x/smart-growth-along-
riverfront-helps-manage-
stormwater-iowa-city-
iowa
Philadelphia Stormwater Tree Trench:
http://www.phillywatersheds.org/what_
were_doing/green_infrastructure/tools/
stormwater_tree_trench
Adaptation
Neighborhood / Building
Rain Readiness
Retrofit homes and
other buildings in
neighborhoods prone to
flooding.X X Small Long Low High High
Yes, it can, if
retrofits are
affordable and
programs rolled
out in LMI
neighborhoods.
Buy out of homes in 100
and some in 500 year
flood plain, but no
retrofit programs.
RainReady Home Program:
http://www.cnt.org/sites/default/files/p
ublications/CNT_RainReadyNation_0.pdf
Adaptation
Extreme Weather
Preparedness
Prepare for heat
emergencies, major
storms and other
extreme weather.Small Short Low Medium High
Yes, if
implemented in
LMI
neighborhoods.Unknown
https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/fi
les/2016-
03/documents/eheguide_final.pdf
Adaptation
Urban Heat Island
Reduction
Require pavement,
roofs, and other built
environment elements
that help reduce the
impacts of summer
heat.X X X X Small Short Low Low High
Yes, if
implemented in
LMI
neighborhoods.Unknown http://aceee.org/research-report/u1405
Other Local Carbon Tax
Implement a charge on
carbon and use the
revenue stream to fund
emissions reducing
activities.X X X X X X Large Medium Medium Medium Low
If revenue stream
supports equity
initiatives.Unknown
Boulder, Colorado Climate Action Plan
Tax:
https://www.c2es.org/docUploads/city-
level-climate-leadership-boulder.pdf
Other Outreach Campaign
Create an education and
outreach campaign to
engage residents and
businesses in GHG
reduction efforts. X X X X X X
Small
(Supporting
activity for
other
reductions)Short Low Medium High
Can be used to
educate about
equity as well.Unknown
Climate Change Communications Guide:
http://static1.squarespace.com/static/56
1930e2e4b0dfaa0349e94c/t/56ba4b63a
b48de3ef4e835d6/1455049574015/Clim
ateSolutions_Ed2.1_English_P9.pdf
Other Funding and Financing
Create a climate action
fund to help pay for and
finance
implementation.X X X X X X
Small
(Supporting
activity for
other
reductions)Medium Medium Medium High
Yes, if funding
stream supports
equity initiatives.Unknown http://www.clevelandclimateaction.org/
4. This will be discussed and vetted later, and will include the potential partner(s) to lead and/or facilitate the implementation of each strategy.
3. Equity considerations may include race, income, location, etc.
NOTES:
1. Costs and Returns on Investment (ROI) are highly variable with program design, and different actors may face different costs and returns.
2. Costs and Returns on Investment (ROI) are highly variable with program design, and different actors may face different costs and returns.