HomeMy WebLinkAbout1976-12-21 Info PacketCity of lawa Ci•
DATE: December 17, 1976
TO: City Council
FROM: City Manager
RE: Informal Session Agenda
December 20, 1976
11:15 A.M. - Lunch with Representative -elect Jim Leach - Highlander Inn
1:30 - 4:30 P.M.
1:30 P.M. - Review Zoning Applications
1:45 P.M. - Review Council Agenda
2:00 P.M. - Council time
2:15 P.M. - Discuss CCN recommendations for HCDA funds for FY 78
2:4S P.M. - Discuss FY 77 Budget Amendments
3:15 P.M. - Executive Session to discuss City Manager's evaluation
4:15 P.M. - Conference Board meeting to review City Assessor's budget
December 21, 1976 Tuesday
7:30 P.M. - City Council Meeting - Council Chambers
December 24, 1976 Friday
HOLIDAY
December 27, 1976 Monday
1:30 - 4:30
1:30 P.M. - Review Zoning Applications
1:45 P.M. - Discuss Council Agenda
2:00 P.M. - Council Time
Discussion of Model Traffic Ordinance
Discussion of Facility Maintenance Report and visit to
Maintenance Building
Site check at American Legion Rd. and South Lawn Crossing
December 28, 1976 Tuesday
7:30 P.M. - City Council meeting - Council Chambers
December 31, 1976 Friday
HOLIDAY ' 1A
City of Iowa City
MEMORANDUM
/ DATE: December 13, 1976
TO: City Council
FROM: City bIanagery
RE: Billing from Honohan, Epley & Lyon
The City has received final billing from Jay Honohan for expenses associated
with William Kidwell concerning the federal investigation. The total charges
amounted to $376.15.
2274
City of Iowa City
MEMORANDUM
DATE: December 16, 1976
TO: City Councilf /
FROM: City bIanagerFl"
RE: Recreation Flees and Charges
The attached fees and charges information will be aypropriately discussed in
conjunction with the. FY 78 budget. The proposed fees and charges policy
represents the recommendation of the Parks and Recreation Commission.
227/
n
U
City of lawa Ci
AnEEMM`'
�•1
A
TO: Neal Berlin, Cit DATE: December 14, 1976
y Manager
FRO/yf: Dennis E. Showalter,
RE: Director of Parks Recreation
Fees and Charges Report
Section la of the
policy, a opted e Proposed new polic
"Adults should on February 6, 1973 Y differs from
grams in which Pay for at least which the existing
they partici a part of the says in Item 8:
P tc, cost of all pro -
In the illustration
tional expenses below, I will
entry fees currently bein show
the percent of
reach 1008 Currently charged andPaid by adult opera-
entry
we leagues, dollar
will need to charge to
LEA % PAID AT
PRESENT $ CHARGED $ NEEDED TO
1' 'fen's Fast Break CURRENTLY REACH
Basketball l
2. hfen's
SIO (schools)
BasketbalBreak 97 $118.50
3. Women's Fast(Rec Center) $122.00
BasketballBreak 102 $130.00
4. Men's Volleyball $128.00
yball 72 $ 67.50
(Ree Center) $ 86.00
5 Women's Volleyball 87
(schools) $ Z7.00 $ 31 00
6. Cd-Recreation75
ball (schools)al Volley $ 22-75
7. Men's Industrial Lea $ 28.00
Softball $ 14.50
League 71
8. Men's Ma' $ 19.00
Softball or League 70 $159.00
9• Men's Minor League 70 $215.00
Softball $1S9.00
{Vo
10. men s Fast 70 $215.00
League Softballch $130.00
$178.00
Tennis 70 .00 $ 98
Classes $130.00
Tennis134 $ 500.
Tournaments $ 3;75
Farmers'95 $ 4.00
Market $ 4.00
300 $2/stall $ 67
0
Neal Berlin
Page 2
December 14, 1976
40
Arts and crafts
The fees char classes have only
class v we charged ran
enrollment. from $6 to $12n welhaveging
been7hold nexpenses.
break even got 50s
unless fee based on 750, In the future g the
least we have 67g enrollmenenrollment and 1oe Plan
100% of thus we not hold tO set the
Opera costs. should be able the
class
Section fees to reach at
�n t e ° polic for swimming - Atpools
Mercerof rpool,�a71e8sefrostfromPresent
CitYmParwetareerecoverin covered
the Rec Center m the Rec Center k Pool, 63.5s g 85.5^
recover onl (September through (summer onl from the
large blocky 42I from winter ghofay)• The >) and 42% from
Club and the oabseme when the pool Rec Cen mainreasonwe
the
nce of receipts is used by swi pool is the
for this time m teams and Swim
The average percent of re
We could reach cover
at the Rec the 80$ recovery for summer pool
Center instead of 25 rate by charging is 77$
MYPersonal
g is 4 for adults
feelin
If we would raise that we should tr
youth (ages 14 throw h 18adults to 7 y to get sHimmin
tickets from w�25 to 5 , install a 50 g to break
and char
32.50,
Project raise 25p and rate for
Section lc differs indicate a 99ise season
previous EorfrOm the old polis $ return rate.
ens
as other Y paid specialized Y in that se
residents, instruction and senior
materialstheSection 1C� the
Po i--,;Um
is not changed same
Y is modified forgASgRp°m the old
Policy except that
Sectio dl the new
senior differs from the old
citizens paid for Policy
(Item 6) in that previously,
Section 3 instruction and
Item is not changed From the old material costs.
policy; it is the same as
Sect_ i= is the
same as
Sectionis the same as Item 10 of the old policy.
I haveaci Item 12 of the old policy.
cities ry
September 14 our led astaff co Piledes and charges from 16
throe staff co at the
through 16. State Convention
Iowa
/ef. ntion on
Attachments: Proposed
Current Fees
and Charges policy
Summar and Charges policy
Y of Fees and Charges
FEES AND CHARGES POLICY
Department of Parks and Recreation
1. User charges or fees are to be levied priruarily to defray operational
expenses.
a. Fees should be assessed to cover all operational expenses of
specialized adult activities, such as leagues.
b. Eighty per cent (807) of the operational expenses of swimming
Pools should be offset by fees.
c- The maximum user charge to be assessed any renior citizen for
a program offered by the Parks and Recreation Department shall
be $1.o0, except that additional charges may be made for costs
Of trips or entertainment.
d- ,Non-residents shall be subject to higher user charges than
residents, the exact amount to be determined by the Director
If Parks and Recreation, except when school -aged youth are
participating in programs for which the School District is
providing and maintaining the facility for -the program.
2. The cost of specialized instruction and materials used in programs
shall -be assessed to the participant except for -senior citizens
S.P.I.
3. The cost of trips and
cipant. entertainment shall be assessed to the parti-
4. An appropriate charge should be made to groups and classes or indi-
viduals who have temporary exclusive use of facilities and equipment
excepting departmentally organized programs, recreation affiAiated
groups, local school systems, other local governmental unit's; or*
local non-profit organizations as described in City Council Reso-
lution #72-229, except where the cost of collection in relation to
the amount collected makes it economically and/or administratively
unfeasible.
5. Unforeseen circumstances and new activities and facilities added to
the system, as well as alterations in present Operational procedures,
may be added and classified under the appropriate policy at the
discretion of the Director of Parks and Recreation. Furthermore,
the Director shall have the responsibility of determining the proper
user charge for any pilot program on a two-year trial basis irregard-
less of any policy set forth within.
'.-
�-- p2�Sc-,Jr- •
POLICIES
The basic policy under which the Parks and Recreation Department operates
is that user charges for certain functions are both an integral and desirable
part of the financial program. JIn addition to the basic policy there are a
number of other policies which are necessary in order to cover all of the aspects
of this operation. These policies cover all user charges levied by the department
and apply to every individual and group irregardless of income level)
1. All facilities are constructed and developed at City expense without user �-
charges to defray the expense.
2. User charges are to be levied only to help defray operational expenses. ( •-
3. Fees should not be collected (regardless of the other 12 assumptions).where the
cost of collection in relation to the amount collected make it economically
_.and/or-administratiyely unfeasib e. — -
4. Certain high operational cost facilities should be subject to user charges.
5. Facilities and activities) to and in which the general public can be admitted
or engages without the monopolization of the said facility or activity, should
be provided free of charge.
6. Both youths and adults should pay for specialized instruction2 and materials3
within any program. .Consummable materials are generally paid for by the partici-
pant.
7. Youths4 and senior citizens should pay for nothing except as indicated in numbers
four and six.
8. Adults should pay for at least part of the cost of all programs5 in which they 1)
participate.
9. Trips6 or entertainments which require extraordinary expense should be paid for by `
the participant.
10. An appropriate charge should be made to groups and/or individuals who have temporary
exclusive use of facilities gnd equipment excepting department organized programs,
recreation affiliated groups , local school systems, other local governmental
units, or local non-profit organizations as described in city council resolution
number 72-229.
11. Non-residents are subject to additional user charges because they do not pay F
property tax to the City of Iowa City on the property upon which they are residing.
12. Unforeseen circumstances and new activities and facilities added to the system,
as well as alterations in present operational procedures, may be added and
classified under the appropriate policy at the discretion of the Director of Parks
and Recreation. The Director shall further have the responsibility of determining
whether or not a fee shall be levied for a new activity or program on a two year
trial basis irregardless of policy in order to assess the feasibility of said
activity or program.
�vw...raur .
(1) Activity -Anything in which a person participates durineisure momenta that
may or may not be organized by participants.
(2) Specialized instruction - Formal or informal education requiring a special
teacher or leader offered to individuals or groups involving services in
more depth than the basic recreation program
(3) Material - food, drink, arts and crafts supplies or other consumable items
furnished by the department.
(4) Youth - Any minor person who has not graduated from high school.
(5) Program - Organized activity in which the department establishes rules,
regulations, and schedules plus the department plays an active part in direct-
ing the said activity.
(6) A trip is when you leave the city by a mode of transportation provided for
or arranged by the recreation department.
(7) Entertainment - An activity in. which a professional or amateur entertainer is
engaged to perform..
(8) Recreation Affiliated Groups - any group with membership open to the public which
Operates as a non-profit organization whose primary purpose ie to engage in
recreation or some recognized recreation activity is eligible.
FEES " C 14A RGES
,LcAGuE S
SEPT
$41tMMtA1G
POO
FEE
SWt1V`
SE/Fsoy
7GN,Y/5
ENniS
eou2F
BNsrtEr
{/OLIDY
5 °fir
/F
RING
F6L
CLASSES
Abu.Lt-
e -mi -p
-7716-
etnssEs
FEES
BAA
i31}GL
i3HLG
f�DU�t
Ni�1L0;.-
vsT
%
Gu Doti
759`
35
` 30
� I
Na
'bio 0
3snl
`� �'
'�
w
tNC—ioN
CS/.(rR-
5PUM C,.
pSwtrtt
/D
►R �Rl S
3 W1r1L pV
r� +,es cs
SA�UL7—
76 ¢
F� t�r
6 &vlt
s "s6s
Nd
PSR TMA
�'
d
ix
3� Gttrl±
/� 6A�rtFS
R iCAPi DS
1110 y o u trl9751^
add
!
°
'
Ab>kt
ro
l� L�1zn6
X30
N i'ory
�320�;5`�
uaut/t
/bl)
Ilo�,
Cos -t
3o 66114
�3;6-0
Ivo
,%l o:�
�o2S�
xyr u!
`
t,tn'ttrmas
f3
CARD
y�'Apd[t
SO M
�f
!°
'f�
�►C I
/oLts�ars
�—
/Olnsous
NJ
c� ,l
r
sr,
eoFir`
�U�FS
6'o ADD U
r r�` -S.
FEL
atatr�rnts =
060X30 �/o
1� AS-,i
• ,
' J LION - (Z 5 N -aFS SNoN-R �orr %'t
IVIblIV�S b�4 3a� NO N4 PER Pt0yER� J D cost 6f A�F2pS
. Cvu
.2. Ua vra SAodtrs sl i�o 91a o ! 10• s�W g
s-O 1�,x,w Fqouts+ i�0 MEN JNIYEQ ��p. Fid
4
3 lOsk1� �,S ycu+R 3 o+v.3CY[-
'_j'7�¢ `��� *k, °a-OAWI-t NO 3 / R.saN �PAfi
' Ing
WKS ti
as AecFt 4#ARG, oNe y 4 2 eF�O
�VO.elt��t iia No f ND
,its -►- ac.s PRoG sss<
.S
2 /a LF u 3otAu,Ly
wad UAW%
SON L9/f`i% ,Avis-tyeutu '3D¢ J5� lSs�ngt� '�5ec�es �� ltl/Y�D +�S'g0 /0 LE ones
/5LOO /9 .otr-suNs �o¢. �S NvrrE a xo lov as h F
fI)m t�'�
"IJM W io J-65SDNS 42je-M ea
tiStr�ari /aeras $ wes SutKaicR.:
your+
o� s
I30 SEN MEN 13g M a, a ec ,uu PD emu r
�oI �.S¢
l 1ilEil J3 weN , 130 �tiko� 9 o+dAtS 9� g
15snve�E In �s No �8 w ,qsa iKtp 9g ��r FRS bF a
)A all A.4rssoms
•City of Iowa Ci
MEMORANDUM -
DATE: December 16, 1976
TO: City Council
FROM: City Manager (v/ly"
RE: Acting Transit Superintendent
,11r. Arlo pry, Senior Driver for Iowa City Transit, will be appointed Acting
Transit Superintendent effective December 18, 1976.
cc: Department Heads
zz72
• 0
CitV 4Mfa
A
TO: City Council
DATE: December 15, 1976 FROM: City Managerw"/
RE: IMA - European Project Team
on the
second EuropeannProjectonal TeamCconsitsting oftgAssociation will select a
I wish to submit an application. The selectiomnwgelsband 2 mayors.
1977• The first project was discussed el the Jul made early in
Mana`ment.
y, 1976 issue of Public
1977. The team will visit England, the Netherlands
urban The Purposes of the project are to stud and �r�y in March,
Policies and practices in European cities the o identify setting
Programs, to transfer ideas to local Communities transferable
the transfer of ideas within the city management' and to
Participate in
The European travel e Profession.
Provided by the Ge expenses Will be covered by a scholarship
will conduct a German btarshall Fund. The Charles J. Kettering
tuition fee, transportation
seminar, The financial obligations araou500 on
trip expenses.. p°rtation expenses to the pre -trip seminar, J500
in Februa The Pre -trip seminar will be conducted as a 3 day Personal
March. ry' and the actual program wil be conducted during 3 weeksoin hop
Iowa City is involved in a number of interesting programs and se
which I believe could benefit from this project - urban renewal, mass
transit,.comprehensive plan
services
and human services, P , senior citizens project, industrial development
/1s this project will requi
Council's positre a commitment of City time and money,the
ion concerning this request is important.
can be financed within the operating budget, as I would reduce the level
of other in -se The tuition level
in-service development in tl�e manager's function during the
remainder of the fiscal year. If.i the Council is concerned about the
extent of the financial contribution by the City and/or the time involved
in the project, I am prepared to personallfroy pay Part of the cost and
charge I°wish ftohdiscuss this prom Iowa City to vacation and/or compensatory
time.
prom
with the City Council on December 20.
•
CITY OF IOWA CITY
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
MEMORANDUM
TO: Neal Berlin
City Council
FRM: Richard J. Plast ino
RE: Monthly Report - November
DATE: ;.December 10, 1976
ENGINNG
The Washin ton Street oxcept,on o Amenities Pro'ect
small number of
r,c trim aroun -ls;complete with the
circumstances minor finish it e planting areas and a
rather than ' the brick trim will Due to a series of
this Fall. be completed this
Spring
Veenstra and Kimm
have cOmPlet
Portion of the Wastewater aci ed the infiltration
Of this study, an Facilities Stud inflow
by television Foss, , ,ty, examination After acceptance
for the new the City will request move of our
sewer sewer systems
the Federal and plant., This moneyy e prepare 'plans
State government will be funded 80o by
The Muscatine Avenue
een sent to t e Im rovement Pro
construction in the
an ect Desi n Stud has
wor is near y on sc e u e for
Summer of 1977.
West Park Lift
Station is under construction.
The FY 77 Landfill Excavation p
The Ten Unit T- r0 ecu ,s at th complete.
owever, tie r—,'
e are no Problems lrport �iss behind -schedule;
with project.
The Brid e Stud of 33
resu is are expected 3 ridges in Iowa
to late Decemberty is on schedule and
We have received no further
ventilation and a- information
consultant in ,r conditionin concerning heating,
Cedar Rapids g in the Civic Center. "The
concerning the use of.heat has not the
additional
pumps• information
Construction
been of 300 feet
Of
of concrete
on South Sycamore has
No further work has been done o
slipline repair. n the southwest
interceptor
page 2. ® • 0
Monthly Report - November
Engineering is preparing the concept statement on Mormon
Trek Blvd, which will be submitted''to the State Department
of Transportation.
This winter, Engineering will begin'`work on plans and
specifications for tennis court lighting, ball diamond
lighting and three (3) roofing repair projects. During
the past construction season, the following jobs were
completed:
1. Park Road Bridge Deck
2. Slurry Seal
3• Asphalt Overlay
4. Concrete Repair Program
S. Mudjacking
6. FY 76 Landfill Excavation Project
7. FY 77 Landfill Excavation Project
8• Schimmel Storm.Sewer.
9. South Sycamore Paving
10. Extention of Sewage Sludge Bed
11. Storm Sewer -800 Block North Linn
12• Storm Sewer at Ridgewood 'Lane
13. Parking Lot B at City Park
14.1 Water Plant Sludge Study
SOLID WASTE DIVISION
The Solid Waste Division picked up 826 tons of solid waste
during the month. Manhours'per ton 'averaged 1.87; which is
very good, particularly considering the extremely,cold
weather. The Landfill Excavation Contract, has -been. -completed.
Work is beginning on insulation of a small section`"of'the
landfill barn so that the equipment can he stored at a
temperature of 35 to 40 degrees. this--wi'l'l-.allow--the =equipment
operators to grease the machinery and change low-the''-equipment
in an
atmosphere warm enough so that lubricants move -freely -'into the
proper parts of the machines.
Delivery of the pull -type scraper should be made within the
next one to two weeks.
POLLUTION CONTROL DIVISION
The crews cleaned approximately 5-,300 feet of 'sani'tary sewer.
Approximately 118 manhours were spent working 'on.the::lift
stations. There were 10 complaints.on sewer stoppages. 7
of these were City responsibility 'and 3 were-proper'ty'owner
responsibility.
Eight (8) employees attended the advanced training course at
the,University of Iowa. Seven (7) employees took a
certification exam on the Toth 'of"'the month.
The reconditioned pump motor was installed at the Hawkeye
Lift Station. The bar screen, rake and chains were repaired.
PagC J.
Monthly Rep . - November
The sewer crews completed bucketing of the eastside inter-
ceptor.
Work continues on stablizing the riverbank along the west
fence line with rip rap.
CODE ENFORCEMENT
46 building permits were issued; 41 mechanical permits;
6 plumbing permits and 28 electrical permits.. -,Total permit
fees were $7,289.00. There are presently 741 active
building permits; 334 active plumbing permits; 594 active
electrical permits and 320 active mechanical permits.,
STREET DIVISION
Four (4) -utility cuts were patched and 160 lineal feet :of
curb was replaced. 628 square feet of sidewalk'was.replaced,
and 11 storm in -takes were cleaned. 330 curb miles were
swept.
The Public Works Director, Street Superintendent and Equipment
Specialist travelled to Rock Island to observe their vaccuum
sweeper. After observation, a decision was made to purchase
a mechanical type street sweeper, as`opposed.to a vaccuum
sweeper.
185 tons of salt and 140 of sand and 300 lbs of calcium
chloride were used for snow and ice removal during the month.
Street crews replaced approximately 4,53 square yards of
" street slabs during the month and 432 manhours-were spent
picking up approximately 150 loads of leaves:" 6'manhours
were spent removing a tree from the Iowa River under the
Park Road Bridge. 32 manhours'were 'spent putting'up 160 feet
of handrail at Ronalds and Brown Street.
The first snowfall of the year occurred on!November 26th in
the amount of 1h inches.
Street Superintendent Paul Dvorsky announced his retirement,
effective March 1, 1977. Mr. Dvorsky has been with the City
20 years. The position will be advertised shortly.
WATER DIVISION
There were four (4) water main breaks during the month.
1,079 feet of new water main was laid. Four (4) new valves
were installed.
142 new outside readers were installed. Harold Donham
retired November 30th from City service.
Page 4.
Monthly Report - November
TRAFFIC ENGIN17ERING
Traffic ,jn seven ing had 16 calls on defective ,traffic,;
signals and seven (7) street light °uta
name signs were replaced and 39 Signs were re g°S• 72 street
placed. 15 new Signs8ns of -other typCS
were installed:
urs
161 a lighting.
were spent in installation of..the 19estlawn
Curve lighting, The northside,is completel
ready to go upon receipt of power from
,200 feet of three _ Y wired and,
inch IO10a/Illinois,
the Southside. �3 ) conduit has been
- laidon
'rhe Traffic Engineer completed the fifth draft
Traffic Ordinance. The FY 78 division budof get get has, been.
riodel
Two postcard surveys were done
Traffic Engineer met with the Urbor an street
discuss traffic lighting. The
circulation in Renewal staff to
The Traffic the .Urban Renewal area.,.,
Pepperwood Engineer met and Br and developers concernin
Eastend Mall and Braverman Addition.
Data 8 the
collection is continuing for the 1977 traffic volume
map.
l:QU1PMENT DIVISION
------------
During the ,month the
installed es division repaired all snowplows
new blades as necessary, ,,and
The division also repaired and operated.the
salt spreaders
The City has refused to, sand and
acce t salt
sent down a to °Perational r p. ,the. new.. ydr'aulic
due
trouble-shooter and p oblems. T}ie factor
Problems may be Y has
Plow frames have ".resolved,
lights have been been installed on the new dump
garage. Anew installed in the Bus Barn andtrucks:' Neon
building, gas -furnace has been installed' service,
in the=service
Routine work orders were completed on various Citi -units.
RJP:bz
CITY OF IOWA CITY
DEPARTMNT OF PUBLIC WORKS
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Neal Berlin
City Council
FROM: Richard J. Plast ino
RE: Rocky Shore Bikeway
DATE:
Rocky Shore Bikeway was originally proposed in the Street Department
budget submission for FY 77. The amount of money was $80,000.
At a Capitol Improvements Program meeting, on January 15, 1976,
discussion of the Rocky Shore bikeway was tied in with Project 44-11
in the FY 76 through 81 Capitol Improvements Program. Project 44-11
was for the amount of $8,000 and was some indefinite type project
for bikeways. Further discussion of the Rocky Shore bikeway resulted
in the conclusion that the Rocky Shore bikeway should be deferred
some time beyond FY 81.
At this time, there is no specific reference to the Rocky Shore
bikeway in any existing Capitol Improvement program.
There is an item called "Bikeway Project" designated as Project 44-4
in the FY 77 through 81 Capitol Improvement program budget.- This is
not the Rocky Shore project, but is some nebulous skeletal bikeway
system for $60,000 in FY 78 in the CIP document.
FIAL81 M.
22 7,57
December 13, 19•
TO: The Iowa City City Council
FROM: Old Brick Associates and The Friends of the Old Brick Presbyterian Church, Inc.
RE: Request for allocation of Community Development Block Grant funds for the
restoration and rehabilitation work in preservation of the Old Brick Presbyterian
Church.
Various groups have collaborated to promote the preservation of the Old Brick
Presbyterian Church on the corner of Clinton and Market Streets. This has bQen and will
continue to be a major effort by citizens to preserve our architectural past. It is the first
time that such an effort has been mounted in Iowa City to save a privately owned structure.
Next to the Old Capitol, the church is the oldest institutional or public building left in
Iowa City. It is a building of architectural and historical significance; it is included on
the National Registry of Historic Places.
We requested an allocation of funds from the Committee on Community Needs.
We hope that you will see fit to support what has been reported as their recommendation.
Historic preservation is explicitly and clearly within the identified categories for which the
HCDA block grants are intended by the federal government. To receive such a grant from
the funds for next year is of crucial importance to the undertaking. We have raised $80, 000
and have $70, 000 promised from the State Office of Historic Preservation. These amounts
will purchase the land and buildings. This leaves us with about $200, 000 in renovation
costs. We shall be greatly assisted if we can show that we can proceed with the essential
early stages of the renovation. This will give us the opportunity to have the building
occupied and rental income started to support its operation.
It is the interest and plan of The Friends of Old Brick to extenditheir function
to a broader application in the community, working toward another entity with a revolving
fund to be used to save and rehabilitate historical houses and other structures that can
be made self supporting. Your help at this point will signal ghat the City is supportive
of citizens' efforts to accomplish preservation on a basis that benefits all sectors of the
community.
In spite of the controvertial aspects of the effort to save the church - which aspects
are not related to the merits of public efforts to save historic landmarks - there has been wide
support and interest by the people of Iowa City, particularly from the older residents, in
assisting in conserving this useful building. The benefits will. be available to all groups,
all socio-economic categories, including the students.
Attached hereto is the November 18, 1976 presentation to the Committee on
Community Needs. This explains the financing, the condition of the structures, the
projected rehabilitation costs, operating statement and probable tenancy. This needs
2.2-76,
To the Iowa City City Council re: HCDA block grant allocation - December 13, 1976
page 2
a bit of updating. As of this writing, the final consideration of the mortgage request
is yet to be done. The proposal is for a $70, 000 first mortgage as stated in the November
18 document, however, the State Office of Historic Preservation now proposes to make
two grants of $35, 000 each (in the next two years) to retire the mortgage loan, rather
than the seven equal payments of $10, 000 each. year.
We would like to point out that historic preservation is one of the cited purposes for the
block grants under the HCD Act of 197f. Further, the conservation of community assets
and resources is especially appropriate in the present context.
PJ
•
November 18, 1976
To: The Community Needs Committee of Iowa City, functioning in connection
with the block grants under Title I of the Housing and Community
Development Act of 1974
From: Old Brick Associates (a limited partnership) and The Friends of the
Old Brick. Presbyterian Church, Inc. (a nonprofit corporation).
Re: Request for allocation of Community Development Block Grant funds for
restoration and rehabilitation work in preservation of an historic site
and building, the Old Brick Presbyterian Church.
Proposal:
In light of the projected costs of approximately $200,000 to achieve repairs,
rehabilitation and minor changes to meet new function (uses) for the buildings,
the applicants wish to request a grant from Title I funds, which grant may extend
over a two year period, if such is more satisfactory to the City.
Although at this date, November 18, 1976, the church property is not yet owned
by Old Brick Associates, agreements are in operation and transfer of title is
expected in the near future. The cost of purchase, approximately $150,000, has
been raised by: fund raising by the sale of shares in the limited partnership to,
the extent of $80,000 (already accomplished), and by a mortgage loan commitment
of $70,000 from a lending institution. There is a commitment of intention from
the State Division of Historic Preservation to make a grant of $70,000, to be
paid to Old Brick Associates in seven annual payments of $10,000 over the next
seven years. This will be used to retire the mortgage.
i
It is the intention of Old Brick Associates to rehabilitate the buildings and
lease the various spaces to community service and similar users. The State
Office of Historic Preservation has tentatively agreed to lease 2400 sq. ft.
of floor space on the ground floor of the sanctuary building. There are serious
prospects for rental of more than the space available within the buildings.
Attached are four exhibits as follows:
1. Item 3 entitled "Projected Operating Income and Expenses, possible
tenants.
2. Item 4, "Status of the Buildings" --The analysis of physical condition.
3. Item 5, "Estimated Costs of Improvements, Totaling $180,000."
4. Item 7, "Zoning of the Property."
E
0
-z-
We have three levels of requests:
A. We prefer to ask for $150, 000 to cover approximately 75% of the work
cited in Item 5 of the exhibits. This work includes exterior building
repairs and improvements, replacing,
windows, installation of after repair, the stained glass
storm windows in the old part of the building,
insulation of ceiling of the sanctuary, refurbishing the interiors,
replacement of the heating system, major expenditures for electrical
system improvements and lighting.
or B. $100, 000 for a part of the needed repairs --with particular emphasis upon
the more urgent items.
or C. $60, 000 for the current year, with the understanding that we can return
with an additional request for the next year. We would use this for
exterior work and essentials to get the premises in condition for
occupancy, including the sanctuary.
We have already raised $80,000 and contemplate that the Friends of Old Brick
will continue to raise funds from individuals, corporations and foundations to
complete the rehabilitation of the Old Brick Church. It is possible that some
minor amounts may be obtainable from the State Division of Historic Preservation,
in addition to the $70,000 cited above which amount is to be applied toward the
purchase price.
If the Committee on Community Needs wishes to divide any grants made for this
undertaking so that a part of the funds are to be used to eliminate architectural
barriers, this would include modification of toilets, door sizes, ramping for
floor changes and a lift or elevator to make the second floor accessible. The
cost of this aspect (not included in the $180,000) may be as much as $50,000,
if an elevator is included.
The Old Brick Church is included on the National Register of Historic Places and
is regarded by art and architectural historians as a significant example of
Romanesque 19th century architecture as employed in this early period of the
region's settlement and population.
The buildings are completely salvable and are very useful in their present
configuration (interior arrangements) with minor changes. The location is
excellent for community service and student oriented activities. It could
Provide space for neighborhood organizations focusing upon the near northside,
Projected operatingm • ite3
income and expenses, possible tants: rev. (2)
There are approximately 9, 000 sq, ft. of rentable, lockable s
and student ministry activities in [he buildin s.ac
sanctuary space on the u g In addition, theref is Offices
entities and o pper floor, which would be shared in use b
to fill the office space users. and There are already identified Y tenant
Provide reasonable use of the co enough possible users
Anticipated rental char mmon-use space.
$4.44 assumed ges, from $4.00 to 5.00/sq, ft r. with an
amount to anal income of: average of
$40, 000. for the office spaces
3, 000. from the sanctuary space
43, 000. expected income (no 'appreciable vacancy factor is
felt needed)
Expenses: I have suggested to the Friends of Old Brick that operating expenses
would be approximately as follows:
4,000.
4,800.
3,200.
4,000.
1,800.
1,200.
2,000.
local real estate taxes
utilities
custodial services
routine building maintenance and minor repairs
building supplies
insurance
management services incl. accou t
$21, 000 yr
*
n ing
legal services
Operational supervision
advertising
Possibility of use of work study funding to reduge costs.
The difference between expected income and expenses is $22, 000.
representing net income. Such might be more, if work study funding Is
In a conventional way,/yr.'
needed for that net income can be used for debt service possible.
as a revolving fund funding for continued improvements to thepremises not fully
general purposes of historical preservation inhelocal larea.
Possible tenants:
Community organizations, social service a
groups, arts and cultural entities, genm of campus ministries, university
in being Occupantsall have come forward indicating
on a rent paying basis as follows- serious interest
Iowa State Historical Department,
Division of Historic Preservation
occupancy of a part of the ground
floor of the sanctuary building.
space
2400 sq, ft.
6 offices + work
& conference area
rent
$9,600./yr
income and expense projections, tenants - item 3, rev. (2) page 2
entity space rent
Lutheran Campus Ministry 1800 sq. ft. $7, 200./yr.
4 offices + coffee
occupancy of a part of the ground house and conference -
floor of the sanctuary building. lounge spaces
both of the above major tenants have made
strong representation of their willingness
and intent. This establishes rent paying
occupancy of the ground floor of the oldest
part of the property, profitable occupancy
of which was not possible to show in earlier
projections of occupancy and income
total income from the two major tenants listed above:
possible tenants for the remaining office space:
Local #12 AFSCME (state and local gov't.
employees' union) 3 rooms,
second floor
M. Willard Lamp Foundation
Meta Media (nonprofit media support group)
11.E.R.A., women's counseling workshop
United Way of Johnson County
Mississippi Valley Council of
Girl Scouts
Visiting Nurse Association +
Easter Seals organization
Crisis Center
office space
office space
300 sq. ft. j
450 sq. ft. + storage
office
space
office
space
office
space
office
space
annual basis
$16,800./yr
amount indicated
as possible
rent
$300./mo.
200.
W1111P
120.
300.
100.
300.
200.
250.
1,970./mo.
$23,640./yr.
plus income from the ground floor of. sanctuary 16,800.
building.
total $4 0, 490. /yr.
• •
income and expense projections, tenants - item 3, rev. (2) page 3
PLUS:
use of the common facilities, i.e., church sanctuary on the upper floor,
kitchen and dining area on the ground floor.
it is estimated that these spaces would yield $3, 000./yr
potential users for the sanctuary space:
Crosstown Players Children's Theatre $400./yr.
Community Playwrights' Theatre and Workshop
Johnson County/Iowa City Arts Council
Children's Museum
Writers' Workshop, U. of I.
Dance Theatre
occasional use for musical performances, choral groups, recitals, film
series, lectures, readings.
0
Status of the Buildings:
• item 4
There are two additions to the original 1856 building. The three parts shall be
referred to as follows:
1. 1856 - original building
2. North addition - a two-story, flat roofed addition to the original
building - extending it approximately 20' to the north (to about the
alley)
3. 1950's Nest addition of religious education spaces - extending the
complex to the west - also abutting the alley.
Condition of Present Structures:
A. 1856 - original building, constructed of masonry bearing walls
(exterior and interior) with wood framing for floors and roof structure.
Masonry Walls: The exterior walls at grade are 20" thick (24" at pilasters).
There is no evidence of differential settlement of masonry walls or of tower walls.
No cracks of appreciable nature, no lintel cracks or failure.
The outer 4" of brick is in good shape in general, joints are in need of
pointing with fresh mortar in some areas. There are no areas in critical condition,
with the possible exception of (1) a small area at the top of the side wall (at eave)
on the west facade and (2) the turret or parapet brick at the top of the tower.
Investigation should be made of need to take action (coatings or penetrating
chemicals) to preserve exterior 4" brick, not critical at present since
deterioration does not seem to be rapid. The stonework at the main entrance
needs resetting and repairs (not a threat to safety).
Exterior Woodwork:
Eaves and soffits need repair in some areas - one spot in particular on west
facade. Renailing and some board replacement is needed in other areas. Caulking
and painting is needed.
Windows: Lower floor double hung sash and frames are not deteriorated to extent
to necessitate replacement. Sills need paint but are still sound. Some glazing
compound application is needed. Storm windows are indicated.
status of the buildings --item •
---� 4
Page 2
Stained glass windows need repairs and protection.
a carpentry check for minor wood Woodwork needstrim replacement and caulking; painting is
needed. It is suggested that a storm panel be placed over each stained
glass window, on exterior --probably plexiglas
material. or similar lightweight
Doors and Frames need carpentry check,caulking and paint
were observed. . No major failures
Roofing: Metal roof is not leaking at present.
It will need periodic painting.
Roofing and flashin
4 of tower (top) need to be checked.
Roof and sidewalls are uninsulated--it is proposed that present ceiling be
removed, 6" batt type insulation be applied, covered with application of
gypsum board or similar wall/ceiling sheet materials. Scaffolding will be
needed; painting and electrical work should be coordinated to use scaffolding.
Trusses and Purlins:
Trusses show no signs of failure, no spreading (exerting
lateral force upon exterior walls), no sagging, no other form of deterioration.
Purlins are run horizontally between trusses and are hidden by ceiling board.
The span is about 8'-0 size of purlins 2" x 6" or 2" x
FloorFlO°r—ung: Floor of sanctuary is level; no signs of settlement or failure
is observable from the first floor (ceiling). Carpeting can be continued in use.
Columns support the sanctuary floor; these seem sound; footings are rocY, or
brick piers below wood floor of first floor.
Floor of first floor is wood, supported by wood joists, about one foot above
earth. (No basement or crawl space is provided.
a pine finished floor with composition ) The floor has asub-floor, plus
position tile (asphalt or vinyl asbestos) as a
wearing surface. The floor at this level shows appreciable unevenness,
indicating settlement of some of the individual supporting piers and beam
bearings. There is no threat to safety in this condition. The uneveness
could be remedied by opening the floor at spots to realign the beams and piers
supporting the joints. A much more expensive solution would be to remove
the 'wood floor entirely, fill as bearing for concrete slab and pour a slab.
status of the building• item 4 •
page 3
Interior The condition of wall surfaces on the lower level is poor; some
improvements and repairs are indicated: Complete repainting is needed. Floors
need cleaning and waxing. That of the large activity room on the ground floor
needs resurfacing with tile or wood, possibly after realigning it by leveling it at
Points of bearing, as discussed above.
Electrical: If loads beyond reasonable lighting and minor equipment are to be
imposed, some new wiring is needed. Service to the building is large enough for
present uses. If extensive air conditioning is done, heaver service and distribution
will be required, i
Considerable expense for new lighting and incidental wiring is scheduled for the
original building and the north addition.
Heating The two pipe steam heating system is old and unsightly (radiation
and piping). It is reported by Larew Plumbing Co, to be operative at present.
The ideal installation would involve a new hot water boiler, resetting radiators and
introducing new radiation and Piping. This is not planned until the latter phases.
B, the north addition, constructed of 12"
floor framing, two masonry bearing walls, wood
stories with flat roof, no basement except boiler room.
nry
masoalls: some repointing of joints is needed generally. The rear wall,
along the alley needs extensive repointing iE me tely, before another winter,
because of roof gutter and downspout leaks that have permitted water to freeze
on the wall, damaging the joints.
roofing: repairs to flat roof are needed to halt present leaks into the second floor
interior space. Flashing at parapet walls may need repairs. Guttering and down-
spouts need repositioning, replacement or repair.
heating,eCtrical work interior finish:
reported above for the 1856 original buildithe conditions are much the same as
ng.
kitchen: replacement of missing stove and refrigerator is needed. Some sink
Plumbing expense is needed and repair of some of the cabinetwork, plus painting;
new lighting fixtures are indicated.
C. the 1950s west addition: masonry walls, 12 " in thickness, with
concrete floor construction (slabs or steel joists with thin slab).
This part is generally in good condition; it needs interior painting, window
repairs, lighting improvements and ininor modifications to toilets. Access to
the first floor for paraphegic individuals is needed, probably via a new door to
the exterior at the west end of the building.
status o: the building item 4 • page 4
D. Exterior yard areas: some improvements in parking area and landscaping could
well be done; however, such improvements are not critical at this point.
W
item s
Estimated costs of improvements, totaling $180, 000. -
Stage 1. Immediate
Stage 2.
Stage 3.
$20,000.
a. repair downspouts and gutters to stop leaks into
and against building.
b. repoint masonry on north addition and where crucial
in original building.
c, replace glass in broken windows.
d, obtain and install storm sash for the windows from
which the stained glass windows have been taken down,
(by the Presbyterians in anticipation of selling them).
e. repair stained glass windows already removed in
order to reinstall them inside the storm sash.
f. acquire and install minimum needed in lighting fixtures
9. clean up the interiors, waxing floors and repainting the
most obvious surfaces.
h. get kitchen into operation, including purchase of used
stove and refrigerator.
I. get heating system into operation.
20,000.
a. repair exterior cornices throughout, replacing
wood only where needed.
b. install storm windows for older part of building,
except for stained glass openings, repair main sash and
paint before covering with storm sash.
c, continue with stained glass removal, repair and storm
sash installation.
d. paint exterior wood trim of buildings, reputtying sash and
caulking extensively. Make carpentry repairs as needed,
e. new lighting fixtures and wiring for minimum needs.
a, repair interior plaster and other wall surfaces.
b, repair and alter doors and trim as needed (exterior)
C. complete the remaining repainting of the interior.
d. electrical service and distribution improvements.
e, additional lighting fixtures
f, heating system repairs and changes (first. of a long
range modernization).
40,000.
(10,000.)
(6,000.)
(10, 000.)
0
Estimated costs of improve •
ments -item 5, cont'd.
Stage 4.
Stage S.
Stage 6.
Page 2
a - exteriorrna 530,000.
b, level the floor ry repair work, only as needed.
by openin of the ground floor of the old building,
g
uP floor at points of bearing to align. Apply
new floor covering.
C- Paint metal roof.
d, improvements to interior finish as needed.
e• refinish and repair entrance doors
f• refinish and improve entrance spaces to sanctuary.
g. repair front steps
a. new exterior stair for le 50.000.
Of church (in north addition) al egress in northeast corner
b, new ceilings in ground floor of sanctuary building.
C, fire alarm system tied to the city stations.
new ceiling . remove sanctuary ceiling, insulate roof and install
new
e• replace heating boiler, converting to hot water
system if possible.
f* improve interior finish of sanctuary,
g• furniture purchases for (20.000.)
replace make shift furnishings mon use areas to
(10, 000.)
a. modernizetoilet20.000.
s and redecorate.
b • continuation of improvements as seen by use of the
Premises as projected.
item 7
zoning of the property (Old Brick church):
lot area contains two of original plat lots amounting to approx 24, 000 sq. ft.
zoning district = R 3 B plus eligibility for high density development since site
is included in high density district also.
for R 3 B district, uses permitted =
multifamily residential (apartments)
apartment hotel
office building
restrictions: ht. = 45' or 3 stories (unless operating under bight density
district requirements)
lot area per apartment = 750 sq, ft. permitting 32 apartments
yard requirements: 20' - front
5' - side
25' - rear
with high density district Privileges:
floor area ratio = 2, permitting a maximum floor area of 48, 000
density limit: sq. ft.
lot area per apartment = 300 sq. ft. , permitting
80 apartments.
note - this number of apartments is probably higher
than is possible under the 48, 000 sq. ft. limit, unless
the apartments are very small.
off street parking is required in both cases. /
40% of lot may be covered with building.
Yard requirements: 20' - front
15' - side
25' - rear
note: any building in the high density district must be 150'
distant from the nearest R -1-A district. The University's
land is shown on the zoning map as R -1-A although its
use does not conform.to those requirements. The pre-
sumption is that the state does not have to conform to
local zoning.
0 0
MI,WtES OF STAFF MEETING
December 1, 1976
A variety of newsletters which are beneficial are being circulated among the
department heads. However, it has been determined that it takes too long to
circulate through the entire staff. Department heads are requested to consider
management newsletters which would be beneficial for their departments and to
circulate these within their own department.
Congressman -elect Jim Leach will be in Iowa City on December 20. He will meet
with the City staff at 10:00 A.M. Department heads were requested to give their
ideas for agenda items to the Administrative Assistant. Each staff person
should plan to give a two -minute rundown on each problem. It is desired to
give Mr. Leach some specific ideas and thoughts on needs which we have.
The Director of Community Development mentioned that some cars have been left
with the motors running in the parking lot. This is undesirable for both
environmental and conservation reasons. The City Manager advised the staff to
caution the employees against doing this.
22 77
MINUTES OP.SPAFP MEETING
November 24, 1976
The City Manager announced the selection and
Director of Finance. appointment of Rosemary Vitosh as
The City Manager requested that the name of the person preparing minutes or
staff are rtsTil appear he the minutes of reports. Over a period,of time.these
items are filed and there is no record of the person preparing it.
The City Manager advised that Jim Powers had called,about rental space,; He has
additional space in the Elks Building.; If.any:§toff members have ,an interest in
this space they were instructed to.talk with'Tom Struve, ;Puirc}iasing-Agent.
The ons.' The me will soon send a memo to the department heads .,regarding investi-
gations: The memo will advise employees to contact,-the City.Attorne and the
City Manager if they are at any time contacted'by investigators. Division heads
are to discuss this memo with a vis
as well as the City, employees. This is for the benefit of the employee
In-bus advertising was briefly discussed. The Director of Community Development
requested that space on the fire engines be reserved for.him. :Also ,one-local
attorney asked for ceiling space in ambulances to take advantage of a captive
audience.
The City Manager advised that he has tapes from the ICMA Conference. One is on
stress and the other is on employee evaluations.
Recent discussions have been held regarding written procedures for departments
in specific areas. The City Manager congratulated the Legal Department for the
document they prepared. This will be distributed to the department heads.
Agenda items were discussed:
The Director of Parks and Recreation was requested to furnish a status report
on the appraisals of the Hayek property. Also inform City Manager regarding
storm water retention on Happy Hollow and Hickory Hill,
A resolution on Ralston Creek improvements should go on the next agenda,
The City Council is not in favor of banning leaf burning. Legal staff
should prepare an amendment deleting leaf burning.
A question arose regarding the vault agreements. Are the agreements going
to be approved singly or all together. A resolution is needed for the Mayor
to sign the agreements.
The Legal staff was requested to prepare the mobile home ordinance for
the December 7 meeting.
Legal staff should modify ordinance regarding regulation of parking meters
on holidays. There is some confusion at the present time,
Councilman Selzer will-be out of the City on December 7 and 8
should be deferred one week. .
Appointments
Department heads were requested to return the completed evaluation forms
to the City Manager as soon as possible- on
heads and one for the City Coune for the Manager from department
cil. The administrative and division heads'
7-Z77
M[`
qrw• cn, ,
ywCITY.
qw, ]ta rw •nW
December 2, 1976
Mr. lfayne Reg] ey
804 Ronald Street
Iowa City, Iowa 52240
Do:rr I. ftcl;lcy:
77rc Purpose
Land g actif tvities to bis y andicotential park acuj updated report on the
rezoningr is to
ition
adjacent 7 ve You an
happened since our
telephone
Park conversaaito inform ypucasvit7ehatnhase
phone to w
7nitiallY, the rezoning to rezone the Property e m Rit submitted b by
;.trs. llayek
Zoning Commission. from to b was denied Will
has been Y the Planni J' d
to not request that time the aPparent the
of ng and
of rezoning• It can thereforel1e C.
Council further the Ha•
the ]and will )eY.s
remain zoned R2, be Presumed that, ;rt, ast Pursue the question
]cast for the present,
I
Secondly as to the
Commission question of park acquisitio
has expressed interest in ac n, the Parks and R
HaycksandrRccrcationse of Ponding y;r�quirin ecreation
Parks ex g the land owned b
pro pert Dennis ShowallerlPI Hollow Park• Y the
Y• ct of this time Mr. • has ]he Director of
but he expects it Showalter o nlered an appraisal in the near future. h.rs not received of the
Third] the appraisal
Y, the HaPPY ]follow Park
poten
potential
t❑ coJ tion w area has een id
olng k n unc ar h entified
mini tialthete for the temporary
the Cityrs Public Works by a consultant
mize advers prary detention Department, as a
the environmental a e Impact of flood' . of flood waters
file and ssessment g on Ralston So as to
is available for on this proposed ro. Crrek.
civic Center, inspection P project has o COPY of
by Housin It is Proposed In the CitClerk-, boon Put on
g and Co that this f Y s office in the
mmunity Develo flood detention
pment Act funds. work be funded
For further information
Purposes, I would °n the acquisition of
Director of Parks andgst that You contact D this
Parcel or
Park -
Recreation. ennis Showalterthe he City's
?•fir
..
�A
1 �
�A
1 �
o
�
n
�
A
a
v
a
O
�
G�
m
z
n
MINUTES OP STAFF MEETING
November 24, 1976
The City Manager announced the selection and appointment of Rosemary
Vitosh as
Director of Finance.
The City :Manager".requested that the name of the, person preparing, minutes or
staff reports appear on the minutes of reports. Over a period -of time ahese
items are filed and there is no record of the person preparing it.
The City Manager advised that Jim
additional space in the Elks BuiPowers had called, about rental space.,; He has
Powers
If any staff members:have.an 1i terest in
this space they were instructed to talk with Tom Struve, Purchasingent.
The City Manager will soon send a memo.to the department heads regarding investi-
gations. The memo will advise employees to contact,.the City Attorney, and the
City Manager if they are at any time contacted by investigators. Division heads
are to discuss this memo with employees. This is for the benefit of the employee
as well as the City.
In -bus advertising was briefly discussed. The Director of Community Development
requested that space on the fire engines be reserved for him..: Also.one,local;
attorney asked for ceiling space in ambulances to take advantage of a captive
audience.
The City Manager advised that he has tapes from the ICMA Conference. One is on
stress and the other is on employee evaluations.
Recent discussions have been held regarding written procedures for departments
in specific areas. The City Manager congratulated the Legal Department for the
document they prepared. This will be distributed to the department heads.
Agenda items were discussed:
The Director of Parks and Recreation was requested to furnish a status report
on the appraisals of the Hayek property, Also inform City Manager regarding
storm water retention on Happy Hollow and Hickory Hill,
A resolution on Ralston Creek improvements should go on the next agenda,
The City Council is not in favor of banning leaf burning. Legal staff
should prepare an amendment deleting leaf burning.
A question arose regarding the vault agreements. Are the agreements going
to be approved singly or all together. A resolution is needed for the Mayor
to sign the agreements.
The Legal staff was requested to prepare the mobile home ordinance for
the December 7 meeting.
Legal staff should modify ordinance regarding regulation of parking meters
on holidays. There is some confusion at the present time.
Councilman Selzer will -be out or the City on December 7 and 8. Appointments
should be deferred one week.
Department heads were requested to return the completed evaluation forms
to the City Manager as soon as possible - one for the Manager from department
heads and one for the City Council. The administrative and division heads'
0 •
forms should he used from now on. The City Manager'advised`that ttie
number rating is not as important to him as the comments describing th
situation and recommendations for improvement. e
The City Manager asked the Legal Staff when the landlord/tenant ordinance
will be available for the City Council. He advised that there is apparently
an
will,
that is preparing a'diaft ordinance ''`Legal"offis apparently
check into this.
The Sign Ordinance Committee completed its work about,a month ago Bob
Ldberg is drafting an ordinance for the Council The'Director of Public
Works was requested to let the City'Manager knOW wTh& thiscto"r oance'will
be completed. It should be coordinated with the'Lega1 Staffs
The stop sign on Court Street at Oakland will not be`installed until'
traffic counts have been obtained. -
Prepared by Lorraine Saeger
1
`/J/J'/ \.J V (AUC,(///) C�P�C C„n�„ ..PI ,•:.•..,::,(1: ST
J
CCC/// (((///C11
December 2, 1976
Mr. Wayne Begley
804 Ronald Street
Iowa City, Iowa 52240
Dear Mr. P,eg}cy:
The purpose this
rezoning activities
letter is to give you an updated report on the
ities and potentia park acquisition activities in the
land adjacent to Happy Hollow park and to inform you as
happened since our telephone conversation. to what has
Initially, the rezoning request submitted by Mr. and Mrs. Will J. Hayck
to rezone the property from R2 to R3 was denied by the Planning and
Zoning Commission. Since that time the apparent decision of the Hayeks
Of rezoning.
has been to not request that the City Council further pursue the question
It can therefore be presumed that, at•leest for the present,
the land will remain zoned R2.
Secondly, as to the question of park acquisition, the Parks and Recreation
COMmission has expressed interest in acquiring the land owned by the
Hayeks for the purpose of expanding happy Hollow Park. '17ie Director of
Parks and Recreation, Dennis Showalter, has ordered an appraisal of the
Property. As of this time Mr. Showalter has not received the appraisal
but he expects it in the near future.
Thirdly, the Happy "allow Park area has been identified by a consultant
doing work in conjunction with the City's Public Works Department, as a
Potential site for the temporary detention of flood waters so as to
minimize the adverse impact of flooding -on Ralston Creek. A copy of
the environmental as
file and sessment on this proposed project has been put on
Civic Center.
available for inspection in the City Clerk's office in the
r. It is proposed that this flood detention work be funded
by Housing and Community Development Act funds.
For further information on the acquisition of this parcel for park
purposes, I would suggest that you contact Dennis Showalter, the City's
Director of Parks and Recreation.
2-2,72
-z-
0
]f you would ]il.e additional information beyond what is
t)rc environmuntaI assessment for tcniporary flood water
purposes, I would detention in
sWorg,st that you contact Richard Plastinontion
Director of Public IJorks• Roth Mr. Plastino and Mr.
Offices in the Civic Center. the City s
Showalter have
ontact me. you have further questions on t}rc rezoning of this
Co
property please
Very truly yours,
Dennis R. Kraft
Director
Department of Community Development
DR F:/ j Sp
ce: Dennis Showalter
Richard Plastino
r \�(�V 6 / //J/�/� Cry`/ �CUC�i C / /•//) CNrCCI "IIA .,Dr Wa ST
,OWE CITY. IOWA
m+.—cn r. rows
December 2, 1976
Ms. M;lrcia Linder
830 Ronald Street
Iowa City, Iowa 52240
Dear Ms. Linder:
The purpose of this letter is to give you an updated report on the
rezoning activities and potentia] park acquisition activities in the
land adjacent to Happy 13011014 Park and to inform you as to what has
happened since our telephone conversation.
Initially, the rezoning request submitted by Mr. and Mrs. Will J. Hayek
to rezone the property from R2 to R3 was denied by the Planning and
Zoning. Commission. Since that
has been to not request time the apparent decision of the Hayeks
Of rezoning. It can that the City Council further pursue the question
the 7:md will therefore.be Presumed that, at least for the present,
remain zoned R2.
Secondly, as to the question of park acquisition, the Parks and Recreation
Commission has expressed interest in acquiring the land owned by the
Hayeks for the PurPose of expanding Happy ){017014 P
Parks and Recreation, Dennis Showalter, has orderek'
Property. As of this time {dr. Showalter hd aran appraisal of the
k. The Director of
as not received the appraisal
but he expects it in the near future.
Thirdly, the Happy )follow Park arca has been identified by a consultant
doing work in conjunction with the City's Public Works Department, as a
potential site for the temporary detention of flood waters so as to
minimize the adverse impact of flooding on Ralston Creek. A copy of
the environmental assessment on this proposed project has been put on
file and is available for inspection in the City Clerk's office in the
Civic Center. It is proposed that this flood detention work be funded
by Housing and Community Development Act funds.
For further information on the acquisition of this parcel for park
Purposes, I would suggest that you contact Dennis Showalter, the City's
Director of Parks and Recreation.
zz 79
-2-
0
If you would like additional information beyond what is contained in
the environmental assessment for temporary flood water detention
purposes, I would suggest that you contact Richard Plastino, the City's
Director of Public Works. Both Nr. Plastino and Mr. Showalter have
offices in the Civic Center.
If you have further questions on the rezoning of this property please
contact me.
Very truly
yours,
Dennis R.
Iraft
Director
Department
of Community Development
DRY,/ j sp
cc: Dennis Showalter
Richard Plastino
® 0
City of Iowa Cit
MEMORANDUM
DATE: December 7, 1976
TO:Planning and Zoning Commission
FROM: Robert Edberg, Zoning Inspector
RE: Recommendations
Zoning for Amendments to the Sign Section of
g Ordinance the City
Many months ago, as a result of some complaints, the Iowa City
Council became concerned about the status of the sign section of the
City 'honing Ordinance and consequently charged thePlanning and Zonin
Commission with the task of studying and reviewing the ordinance with
an eye to possible modifications, Consequently, a Sign Review
Committee was formed to undertake
this detailed study, This committee
labored long and diligently (two times a
one half studmonth for about a year and
studying the sign ordinance section by section, paragraph
by paragraph, and sentence by sentence. The goals of this detailed
study were to improve the clarity, eliminate all inequities, and to
promote the health, safety, and welfare of all th
City. e Citizens of Iowa
efPeople who were members of this Committee and devoted their
forts to this study are:
Dennis Kraft
Donald Schmeiser
Robert Edberg
Robert G. Bennett
Fred Maihack
Keith Kafer
Director of Community Development
Senior City Planner, Planning b Zoning
Commission
Zoning Inspector
Proctor 6 Gamble, Business Man
Chamber Of' Commerce , Business Man
Chamber of Commerce
28'�
® 0
Itccommon`Iril Ir'Os for Amendments Co the SI
Zoning Ordc
inane
December Rn Section of the Clty
Page 2 �r 1976
Penny Davtdsen
City Council
Don ,Madsen
Planning 6 Zoning Commission
University of Iowa
William Sueppel
Al Jeff Local Attorney
Local Attorney
Bernie Wright
Sign Advertising Company, Business Man
Robert Schwab
Billboard Adv. Company, Busines Man
William Nowysz
Local Architect
Donna Friedman
University of Iowa, Outdoor Art Expert
John Balmer
City Council, Business Man
Juanita Vetter
Following are described
Planning 6 Zoning Commission
and listed the numerous suggested
changes to be made in the sign section
of the Iowa City Zoning
Ordinance,
The Sign Review Committee has voted to submit these
Proposed changes to the Planning and Zoning Commission for its study
and review;
A• It is recommended that, in the interests
lessened confusion of clarity andthat
the following definitions be added
"definitions" section, paragraph 8.10.35.1 to the
1• REAL ESTATE SIGNS — Temporary signs, advertising the
sale, rental, or lease of the premises or part of the
Premises on which the signs are displayed.
2. CONSTRUCTION SIGNS — Signs identifying the architects,
engineers, contractors and other individuals involved
the
construction. of a in
building and signs announcing the
Recommendations for Amendments to the Sign Section of the City
Zoning Ordinance -
December 7, 1976
Page 3
Che character of Lhe hu1Jd.ing enterprise or the purpose
for which the building is intended but not including
product advertising.
3. POLITICAL CAMPAIGN SIGNS - Temporary signs announcing
candidates seeking public, political office or pertinent
Political issues or signs containing other election in-
formation, such as "Vote Today" signs.
4. SEASONAL DECORATIONS - Signs pertaining to recognized
national, state, and local holidays and observances.
5. PUBLIC SIGNS - Signs of a non-commercial nature, and in
the public interest, erected.by or upon the order of a
public officer in the performance of his public duty, such
as safety signs, zoning signs,.Memorial plaques, signs of
historical interest and all similar signs, including signs
designating hospitals, libraries, schools, airports, and
other institutions or places of public interest and concern.
6. INTEGRAL SIGNS - Such signs for churches, or temples, or
names of public buildings, dates of erection, monumental
citations, commemorative tablets and other similar signs
when carved into stone, concrete or other building material
or made of bronze, aluminum or other permanent type of
construction and made an integral part of the structure
to which they are attached.
7. PRIVATE TRAFFIC DIRECTION SIGNS - Such signs directing
traffic into a premises or within a premises.
n
L.�
0
Recommendations for Amendments to the Sign Section of the (:
7,,nLng Ordinance
December 7, 1976 ity
Page 4
8. VEHICLE SIGNS - Such signs accessory to the use of any
kind of vehicle, providing the sign is painted or
attached directly to the vehicle.
9. PUBLIC INSIGNIA AND FLAGS - Such insignia, flags, and
emblems representing the United States, the State of
Iowa, and municipal and other bodies of established
government, or flags and insignia which display the
recognized symbol of a non-profit or non-commercial
organization.
10. OBSOLETE SIGNS - .Such signs that advertise an activity,
business, product or service no longer conducted on the
premises on which the sign is located,
11. BANNER - A piece of cloth, paper or plastic sheet
attached to one or more supports and which has advertising
or indentification information lettered on its surface.
12. BALLOON - An in rubber bag filled with a gas and
often tied to poles or horizontal supports to serve as
an attention getting device.
13. POSTER - A relatively lar$e printed card or sheet of
paper or plastic posted to advertise or publicize a
product, place or event.
14. STREAMER - A long narrow strip of cloth, colored paper
or plastic hanging loose at one end and designed to move
and flutter in the wind to attract attention to a location.
Recommendations for Amendments to the Sign Section of the Clty
Zoning Ordinance
December 7, 1976
Page 5
15. SPINNER - A piece of metal or plastic shaped in a form si
similar to a propeller and designed to rotate in the
wind to attract attention from passers by.
16. SWINGING SIGN - A sign which, because of its design and
construction, is free to swing or move noticeably
because of pressure from the wind.
17. PORTABLE SIGN - Such signs that are not permanently
anchored or secured to either a building or the ground.
18. PUBLIC PROPERTY SIGNS - Signs that are not located on
the premises of the business or organization being
advertised but are located on public property,
19. PAINTED WALL SIGNS - Signs which are actually painted
directly on the surface of the wall of the building.
This definition specifically does not include Murals,
Public Art, or Supergraphics.
20. HAZARDOUS SIGNS - Any sign which because of its location,
coloring, illunination, or animation interferes with a
motorists perception of vehicular or pedestrian traffic,
of intersectional traffic, of traffic control devices, or
of traffic directional. signs. Any sign which because
Of its construction or state of repair is likely to fall
or blow down and cause possible injuries to passers by.
21. ROOF - The top covering of a building or area designed
and constructed to shield the area underneath from the
weather. The term "roof" includes the term "canopy".
0
0
Recommendations for Amendments to the Sign Section of the City
Zoning Ordinance
December 7, 1976
Page 6
22. ROOF LINE - The highest point for a flat roof; the deck
line of a gambrel. and mansard roof, and the eaves of a
saddle, hip, or ogee roof,
23. NON -CONFORMING SIGN - A sign that is not allowed in the
specific zoning district in which it is located except
for PROHIBITED SIGNS.
24. SIGN - Maintain the definition in the current ordinance
but add the sentence: ".,,,,The following listed artistic
creations are specifically exempted from this definition
and do not require permits under this sign ordinance:
Public Art, Murals, and Supergraphics."
25• WINDOW SIGN - Is a sign painted on a window or affixed
to a window or hanging adjacent to a window and obviously
intended.to be viewed through the window by the public
outside. This definition is not intended to include
merchandise or product displays.
26. PUBLIC ART - Any work of art exposed to publir: view from
any ?ublic right-of-way. Public Art must not contain
any advertising nor can it contain any commercial
symbolism such as logos and trade marks or any representation
Of a product.
27. SUPERGRAPHICs - Abstract, or geometrical, designs painted
on or otherwise affixed to the walls of a building to
improve its esthetic appearance. Other wards for
supergraphics are architectural decoration. Supergraphics
0
0
Recommendations for Amendments
Zoning Ordinance to the
December Sign Section of the City
7, 1976
Page 7 '
must not contain any advertising nor can they contain
any commercial symbolism such as logos or trademarks
or any representation of a product,
28. MURALS - A large expanse of
wall area covered by paint
or other artistic medium to create a pictorial or
abstract design representation. A mural must not
contain any advertising nor can it contain any commercial
symbolism such as logos or trademarks or any representation
1f aofproduct. An area not to exceed four square feet or
the total mural area, whichever is smaller, may
be used to identify the artists and the sponsors,
29• BILLBOARD SIGN - Any off -premise sign directed to
traveling public, the
30. OFF -PREMISE SIGN
Any sign that is not an on -premise sign
and further as a billboard sign
Most of the above definitions
are new but a few are rewrites
Of the current sign ordinance language,
B. Paragraphs 8
10 35, 2 "SIGNS PERMITTED IN ALL ZONES"
should be changed in the following respects;
1• Subparagraph C, "POLITICAL CAMPAIGN SIGNS" - In Cl
eliminate the words "In residential zones" and
"In all zones", substitute
The second paragraph, now unnumbered,
should be labeled number 2, The present paragraph 3
shouwhicld
be deleted and replaced by a new paragra h
says Zn C and P 3
zones the six square'foot size
0
0
Recommendations for Amendments to the Sign Section of the City
Zoning Ordinance
December 7, 1976
Page 8
may be exceeded for posters applied to authorized
millboards"
2. Subparagraph D, "SEASONAL DECORATIONS"; Delete the
present paragraph and substitute the following: "Non -
advertising signs pertaining to recognized national, state,
or local holidays and observances. Such signs and de-
corations shall not be erected earlier than six weeks
prior to the holiday or observance and any such signs
and decorations shall be removed no later than three
weeks after such holiday or observance. It is the
intent of this paragraph to establish that Seasonal
Decorations are exempt from the prohibition of roof signs
and are exempt from the prohibition of animated signs.
They are also exempt from the limitations on area,
number of signs, and illumination imposed by the
several individual zone regulations. Seasonal
Decorations shall be governed by all other provisions
of the ordinance including the requirement to withstand
30 pounds per square foot of wind loading, and the
prohibition of hazardous signs.
3. Add a new subparagraph, K, "ADDRESS IDENTIFICATION SIGNS -
Such signs are not to exceed two square feet in area
and will include only the residents name and street
address." This paragraph was added to avoid the need
to demand a sign permit and a $300,000 liability insurance
Recommendations for Amendments to the Sign Section of. the City
Zoning Ordinance
December 7, 1976
Page 9
policy from every resident of the city.
4. Add a new subparagraph, L, "SALE SIGNS - Temporary
signs not to exceed two square feet in area which
advertise private events such as garage sales. Such
signs must not be affixed to utility poles or traffic
control signs and must not be located on the public
right-of-way. Such signs may be displayed only for
the duration of the described event. Such signs shall
be non -illuminated.
C. "SIGNS PROHIBITED IN ALL ZONES", paragraphs 8, 10, 35, 3
should be modified in the following respects:
1. Delete subparagraph F, "PAINTED WALL SIGNS" and sub-
paragraph I, "ROOF SIGNS". This will automatically
put these signs in the non -conforming category and will
prohibit the erection of new signs of these types but
will allow the present signs to remain up until
11 September, 1981.
D. "ELIMINATION OF PROHIBITED SIGNS AND NON -CONFORMING
SIGNS", paragraph 8, 10, 35, 4.
1. In subparagraph A, the reference to the removal of window
signs near the end of the paragraph should be deleted.
Window signs are no longer prohibited signs.
2. Subparagraph B, "AMORTIZATION OF NON -CONFORMING SIGNS"
has already been modified by an amendment to the Ordinance
passed by the City Council which extends the moratorium
0
0
Recommendations for Amendments to the Sign Section of the Ctty
Zoning Ordinance
December 7, 1976
Page 10
period from 3 years to 8 years from 11. September 1973.
E. Paragraphs 8, 10, 35, 5, "R1A, RIB, and R2 ZONE
REQUIREMENTS". The only suggested change in this section
is.
1. Eliminate subparagraph Bl; since we have already allowed
two square foot name and address signs as permitted in
all zones without a permit. This removal resolves a
conflict in the ordinance.
F. Paragraphs 8, 10, 35, 6, "R3, R3A, and R3B ZONE
REGULATIONS". The following changes are recommended:
1. In subparagraph Al, the reference to paragraph_ 8.10.7.A
should be changed to read paragraph 8.10.35.5.B.2.
This simply corrects a mistake in referencing.
2. In subparagraph B.1 (a, b, c) the word "complex" should
be deleted. This will allow a sign of appropriate size
to be located on each building of a multiple building
dwelling complex.
3. It was decided to add a sentence to this section which
would allow one sign (free standing or facts) not to
exceed four square feet in area to identify the office
area in multiple building apartment complexes.
G. Paragraph 8.10.35.7, "Cl and CO ZONE REGULATIONS"
Desired changes are:
1. Subparagraph B.3 should have a sentence added which says:
"This second allowed facia sign must not be located on
0
0
Recommendations for Amendments to the Sign Section of the City
Zoning Ordinance
December 7, 1976
Page 11
the same building face as that on which the first
facis sign is located. The two facia signs must be
located on separate walls facing the respective
intersecting streets."
2. Subparagraph B.5 should have added in the second line
after "not" and before "exceed" the phrase, "in total".
This clarifies the window sign allowance to provide fpr
more than one small sign in a given window.
3. Subparagraph B.2 should have a sentence added which says:
"No monument sign shall exceed 5 feet in height above
grade".
Il. Paragraph 8.10.35.8," CH ZONE REGULATIONS," should be
modified as follows;
1. Subparagraph A.3; the last sentence beginning "In all
instances ....."should be deleted. It is a meaningless
statement and refers to nothing.
2. Subparagraph B.1 in the first sentence should read
(a, b, c, d) rather than (a, b, c).
3. Subparagraph B.1.b in the last sentence following the word
"CH" should appear the work "zones". This is merely to
correct a typegraphical error.
4. Subpragraph B.l.d. The maximum size allowance should
be reduced from 125 square feet to 100 square feet. This
makes the paragraph compatible with a later statement
which specifies a maximum sign dimension of 10 feet.
Recommendations for Amendments to the Sign Section of
Zoning Ordinance the City
December 7, 1976
Page 12
5• Subparagraph 8.3 should have a sentence added which says:
"This second allowed facia sign must not be located on the
same building face as that on which the first facia sign
is located, The two facia signs must be located on
separate walls facing the respective intersecting streets."
6• Subparagraph B.4 should have the words "free standing"
deleted. This will allow both free standing and wall
mounted billboard signs in a CH zone,
7•- Subparagraph B,6 should have added in the second line
after "not" and before "exceed" the phrase, "in total,'.',
This clarifies the window sign allowance to provide
for more than one small sign in a given window.
I• Paragraph 8.10.35.9, "C2 ZONE REGULATIONS," the following
changes should be made:
1. Subparagraph A.2; the last sentence which begins "In all
Instances ....... " should be deleted. It is a meaningless
sentence and refers to nothing,
2. Subparagraph B,3 should have a sentence added which says:
"This second allowed Facia sign must not be located on
the same building face as that on which the first facts sign
is located. The two Facia signs must be located on
separate walls facing the respective intersecting streets.
3. Subparagraph B,4 the words "wall mounted" should be
deleted. This will allow both free standing and wall
mounted billboards in the C2 zone.
Recommendations for Amendments to the Sign Section of the City
Zoning Ordinance
December 7, 3.976
Page 13
4. Subparagraph B.6 should have added in the second line
after "not" and before "exceed" the phrase "', in total,".
This clarifies the window sign allowance to provide far
more than one small sign in a given window,
5. Eliminate subparagraph B.4. This deals with specifications
for a projecting sign which is not allowed in C2 zone.
J. Paragraph 8.10.35,10, "CB ZONE REGULATIONS" should be
modified as follows:
1. Subparagraph B.4 should be changed to read: "One
on -premise advertising marquee sign not to exceed one
square foot of area per lineal foot of building frontage
or fifty square feet per sign face shall be permitted
for theater marquees. Said sign shall not consist of
more than two faces and may be non -illuminated or
internally lighted with a non -flashing light source."
2. Subparagraph B,5 should have added in the second line
after "not" and before "exceed"
the phrase ", in total,".
This clarifies the window sign allowance to provide for
more than one small sign in a given window,
K, Paragraph 8,10,35,11, "CBS ZONE REGULATIONS" should be
changed as follows:
1. Subparagraph B.5 should be deleted. Otherwise there is a
conflict between two different paragraphs regulating
window signs.
2. Add subparagraph to section B which says: "Wall mounted
Recommendations for Amendments to the Sign Section of the City
Zoning Ordinance
December 7, 1976
Page 14
billboards are allowed as long as they conform to
Section 13, "OFF PREMISE SIGN REGULATIONS",
3. Subparagraph C4, the phrase "off -premise signs or
billboards" should be deleted. This is needed to
avoid conflict with the previous allowance for
wall mounted billboards.
4. Subparagraph C.5 should be changed by adding after
".....attached to" and before "any" the phrase "the
outside of". This eliminates conflict between this
paragraph and the one that allows window signs.
5. Subparagraph C.6 should have added in the second line
after "not" and before "exceed" the phrase", in total,".
This clarifies the window sign allowance to provide
for more than one small sign in a given window.
L. Paragraph 8.10.35.12, "M1, M2 and ORP ZONE REGULATIONS"
should be changed as follows:
1. Subparagraph A.1. The second sentence beginning "In all
instances ....." should be deleted. It is a
sentence and refers to nothing.
2. Subparagraph B.3. The word "free-standing" should be
deleted. This will allow both free-standing and wall
mounted billboards and avoids conflict with a later
paragraph.
3. Subparagraph B.4 should have added in the second line after
"not" and before "exceed" the phrase ", in total,".
Recommendations for Amendments to the Sign
7_oning Ordinance Section of the City
December 7, 1976
Page 15
This clarifies the window sign allowance to provide
for more than one small sign in a given window.
4. Subparagraph B.l,c; The maximum sign area allotment
for free-standing signs should be changed from fifty
square feet to seventy-five square feet per sign face.
5• Subparagraph C; add a paragraph which states" "all
monument signs must extend no higher than five feet above
grade".
6• Subparagraph C; add a paragraph which says; "All
free-standing signs must extend no higher than thirty
five feet above grade and must be no lower than ten
feet above grade",
M. Paragraph 8.10.35.13, "OFF -PREMISES SIGN REGULATIONS"
should be changed as follows;
1• Subparagraph A.1; In the first sentence, 11C2" should be
changed to read "CBS".
2. Subparagraph A.1, In the second sentence the reference
to "CH, M1 and M2" should be changed to read "CH, C2, Mi
and M2".
3. Subparagraph A.7 should be changed to read; "All free-
standing billboards shall not exceed a height of thirty-
five feet above grade and shall be no lowe- than ten
feet above grade." This brings the height requirements
for billbaords into line with the height requirements
for all other free-standing signs,
Recommendations for Amendments to the Sign Section of bhe City
Zoning Ordinance
December 7, 1976
Page 16
N. Paragraph 8.10.35.15, "MATERIAL AND CONSTRUCTION
REQUIREMENTS"
1. Subparagraph A should be deleted. Because of the near
impossibility of finding a satisfactory definition�it
was decided to eliminate this requirement, FOG INCe113v:!T16LC
2. A new subparagraph, A, was written which reads: "All
signs must be maintained in good physical condition and
state of repair"
3. Subparagraph B. Delete the reference "(A -J)". It is
inacurate and redundant.
0. Paragraph 8.10.35.18, "PERMITS REQUIREDI
I. In the above paragraph delete "(A -J)". It is inacurate
and redundant.
2. In the above paragraph following "..... 8.10.35.2 and
before "without first ....... insert the phrase: "and
also non -illuminated window signs in C and M zones."
P. Paragraph 8.10.35.20, "APPLICATIONS".
1. Subparagraph D.should read: "A sketch of the sign with
dimensions, a note of materials used, and showing
method of construction and attachment to the ground or a
building".
2. Subparagraph E should read: "Signature of an engineer or
architect or other authorized agent certifying that the
sign will withstand the specified 30 po#nds per square
U
foot of wind loading".
Recommendations for Amendments to the Sign Section
Zoning Ordinance of the City
December 7, 1976
Page 17
3. Subparagraph I should read; "A certificate of insurance
which meets the requirements spelled out in paragraph
8.10.35.23."
Q. Paragraph 8.10,35,22, "PERMIT FEES" should be changed
as follows:
1. In the above paragraph the reference "(A -J)" should be
deleted and in its place put "and non -illuminated
window signs in C and M zones."
R. Paragraph 8.10,35,23, "INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS".
1. The above paragraph should be changed by deleting the
phrase "liability insurance policy" in the second
and third lines and replacing it with "certificate
Of liability insurance".
S. Parsgraph 8.10.35.24, "MISDEMEANOR".
1. The above paragraph should be modified by the addition of
the following sentence: "Each day of violation may be
considered a separate offense."
T. ADDENDUM - A new subparagraph should be added to each
C and M zone regulations. It should read: "Time and
temperature signs are allowed provided they do not exceed
in size an area of twenty-five square feet per sign
face and contain no advertisint".
U. MURALS, SUPERGRAPHICS, AND PUBLIC ART - have been declared
not to be subject to the sign regulations contained in the
Iowa City Zoning Ordinance. It is the recommendation of
this committee that supervision of these shouldbe assigned
Recommendat.lon for Amendments to the Sign Sect ton of rho (:try Ordinance
December 7, 1976
Page 18
to some other committee such as the Design Review
Committee or perhaps retained by the Iowa City Council
itself.
V. Considerable discussion with the local attorneys and
Bob Bowlin, the Asst. City Attorney, was devoted to
logal questions concerning .the sign regulations.
Finally, a consensus was achieved:
1. An eight year moratorium period for non—conforming signs
was likely to be much more acceptable to the Courts
than the original three year period.
2. The sign ordinance is legally a part of the Zoning
Ordinance as was the apparent intent of the City
Council judged by the title of the amendment which
made the sign ordinance into law.
3. The Board of Adjustment has the power, withing the limits
imposed by the Code of the State of Iowa and pertinent
Iowa City Ordinances, to hear cases of interpretation of
and grant variances to the sign regulations section of the
Iowa City Zoning Ordinance.
4. Some discussion was held on the recent Supreme Court
case which outlawed the prohibition of pharmacists right
to advertise. The decision seems to say that "Commercial
speech" has some right to protection under the First
Amendment and that the right to advertise cannot be
Prohibited. It does not seem to affect the sign ordinance
Recommendations for Amendments to the Sign Section or the City
Zoning Ordinance
December 7, 1976
Page 19
In any way since the sign ordinance does not prohibit
sign advertising but merely seeks to regulate it.
W. An ordinance amending the zoning code sig regulations
by adding new provisions allowing persons who removed
roof signs after September 11, 1973, to replace those
signs until the date on which the zoning code sign
regulations require non -conforming signs to be removed,
and repealing Ordinance No, 2683, Section Iv, Paragraph
I, (8.1.0.35.3.I, Iowa City Code of Ordinances).
Be it ordained by the Council of the City of Iowa City,
Iowa;
SECTION I. PURPOSE. Ordinance No. 2683 became effective on
September 11, 1973. It required all roof signs to be removed by
September 10, 1974. A number of persons removed their roof signs
after September 11, 1973, in compliance with Ordinance No. 2683.
This amendment allows those persons to replace those signs until
the time when all non -conforming signs must be removed.
SECTION 1I. AMENDMENT REPLACING ROOF SIGNS.
I. Notwithstanding any other provision of the zoning code
sign regulations, roof signs that were removed on or after September
11, 1973, may be replaced, in their original position, and may remain
until the date on which the zoning code sign regulations require
non -conforming signs to be removed; provided, however, that such
roof sign is not otherwise illegal. If the original sign is no
longer extant, a substitute may be used, but such substitute shall
Recommendation for Amendments to the Sign
Zoning Ordinance Section of the City
December 7, 1976
Page 20
be no larger than the original.
2. Any person desiring to replace a roof sign removed on or
after September 11, 1973, shall apply to the sign inspector for a
pr:rmit. The sign inspector shall. charge no fee for the permit.
SECTION III. ROOF SIGNS DESIGNATED AS NON -CONFORMING SIGNS.
Roof signs in all zones are hereby designated as non -conforming signs,
and shall be removed not later than the date on which the zoning code
sign regulations require the removel of all non -conforming signs.
SECTION IV. REPEALER. Ordinance No. 2683, section IV, paragraph
I, (8.10.35.3.I, Iowa City Code of Ordinances), and all other
ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of
this ordinance, are hereby repealed.
SECTION V. SEVERABILITY. If any section, provision or part
of the Ordinance shall be adjudged to be invalid or unconstitutional,
such adjudication shall not affect the validity of the Ordinance
as a whole or any section, provision or part thereof not adjudged
invalid or unconstitutional.
SECTION VI. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall be in
effect after its final .,passage, approval and publication as required
by law. A.
It was moved by
and seconded by
that the Ordinance be finally adopted, and upon roll call there
were:
mW
G N
.D m
rJ, L
III)
J
INN
V,ca�raaA '/�p� y {•�1��(p®��9y1.�
'Z ([(V� U)O,fib/ �OqI �7 "ndH NIr+W P yW (BOp FoI Y+F9+'In F01 t'I d H 9 F*
H O® C" [' O Q' -,v F.
r1 7c' r'I M N 1 -00 m N M'0
'C®Y7 > m Pli� M 6r to ryry fD n n p O I9 rr O 1+ N
.t N m 0 9 M rt r-] W M rA n n
n n w
it CnmTj 0�o -. 0 n �CC Mn
O n 100 0 1
p 7
~' H H n O O
r n~ 8
' fD W0 N
O rt n p R
0 0
r '
Y Y
o O H w w%D Y N t -_z w
H A H H Ot D O m a H tD w w a w w —w—w m w O m J w a
Ln Cl) O m O a !-' H lD a a N N H m H W W m H J W J W O
N N a N m a N N w J w w O Ot Ot W H a W J ZD w-0 W a H N H O w W N w CO
w J O L Y N w m W N W J J J m O m N J W O w a J H W H O w O• m H J to J
O H O w m m H w N O m a a a m L w m a m H N m H t0 W W O m m m J O m 0
O O w a J m m m m m a N tJ J w J "a m w w w W m J O N O N N w w H w N
p tp L L J m W H W O lD H Y N O J O H O tD w m m m m O H N W tD a m m W W
Y H N
L lD m a
W
Y OW wtD
N Y (Dl
a J WN
w O OIm
m
m
J
to
O
0
H H
w H w o
J C`
m U H t0
C H
O m J t0 N
w J
m D` J w w w
H J
w m a W m W
w rJ
m rJ w a tD w
O w
m
N
O t7
J
L
O N
O
-1
Y H N
L lD m a
W
Y OW wtD
N Y (Dl
a J WN
w O OIm
m
m
J
to
O
0
H H
w H w o
J C`
m U H t0
C H
O m J t0 N
w J
m D` J w w w
H J
w m a W m W
w rJ
m rJ w a tD w
L Y
w w m tD Y w
ME
Go
m
O
tD
J
w
O
O
H
to H W
w 0 0 a tO J W G\
N m J tJ G` J to W O a
woct aN ctaH Ha
O tD tD W N N V N m a
O lA w a L W N N J Y tD
H Y N Iw
N
a
W
J
J
L
CM,
A N a W H W
H N J m H W J J W m H D\ m w w 1 m W
O a m m J DJ m w N a A m W H G` m J m L
W l0 H H N O w 01 O N W J H F H J J m H J m
w tD W N O J a J m m m ON w m m ON to m J w tD
N N rJ m O N m 0 W tD . tD w J J J. W N a m
a J O m O H w N H m O w w O w W w a H a N
w tD O J O w m N w w J H m J w a O m w H m
w m
w H
N
Cn
a a H H H
J w N H to m H N W W W N O a A 0
0
O COm J W lD m W H O M to W w m a H H N to
1
I H O H W J m m a 0 tD O H m w w m O m m
I a J N tD 1 a 0 IT N m J Ot a a W H a W N a
t0 N W tD W CO m l0 w O w m a W W O W J m
tD H w N O t0 lD a N O N.0 l0 w Ot J m J
N Qa
w O ` a J H J 0 0 0 m t0 J ID H J w m
L L W H W H H H w
N H a tD H a H a r N m N W W W O O N N
l'J m ON J W a J W a m m N m O J l0 N H m H J w
W J W m N O m H W N w a m N W m W N H Ot m
a Ot m H J m w O W O tD m w a H w J J W J N
o H m
tow m w H o m J m
m m a o a H H
m tD O H w 0 0 d` H w m w H O N to J m m m 0
T Y J W Y N W W J J W
0
t*1
H
ro
H
N
O H
m
L J
G\ J
COY
w
J
to m
a J tm
m W
O
O O
H m a w
ID m
m 0
J J Y O
a m
t0
N w
H o H CO
w m
IZD
m
H O
H J tD m
J m
W
0 w
H O J w
w 0
0
N
a
W
J
J
L
CM,
A N a W H W
H N J m H W J J W m H D\ m w w 1 m W
O a m m J DJ m w N a A m W H G` m J m L
W l0 H H N O w 01 O N W J H F H J J m H J m
w tD W N O J a J m m m ON w m m ON to m J w tD
N N rJ m O N m 0 W tD . tD w J J J. W N a m
a J O m O H w N H m O w w O w W w a H a N
w tD O J O w m N w w J H m J w a O m w H m
w m
w H
N
Cn
a a H H H
J w N H to m H N W W W N O a A 0
0
O COm J W lD m W H O M to W w m a H H N to
1
I H O H W J m m a 0 tD O H m w w m O m m
I a J N tD 1 a 0 IT N m J Ot a a W H a W N a
t0 N W tD W CO m l0 w O w m a W W O W J m
tD H w N O t0 lD a N O N.0 l0 w Ot J m J
N Qa
w O ` a J H J 0 0 0 m t0 J ID H J w m
L L W H W H H H w
N H a tD H a H a r N m N W W W O O N N
l'J m ON J W a J W a m m N m O J l0 N H m H J w
W J W m N O m H W N w a m N W m W N H Ot m
a Ot m H J m w O W O tD m w a H w J J W J N
o H m
tow m w H o m J m
m m a o a H H
m tD O H w 0 0 d` H w m w H O N to J m m m 0
T Y J W Y N W W J J W
0
t*1
H
ro
H
N
CIVIC CENTER 410 E. WASHINGTON ]T.
�•PP �//C� �� IOWw pTY.IOWw 6?1W
I]I01 ]54f E00
December 14 1976
MAYM
Mw MEUNA~
CCvM LWWlR!
J YWEA
CAIOLd."02E
L E.IOETER
DAVM)EERRET
KU ULZUI
RDE VERA
Dr. F. D. Staab, Mayor
City of University Heights
901 Melrose Avenue
Iowa City, Iowa 52240
Dear Mayor Staab:
In a letter dated November 18, 1976, the City of; Iowa City offered to meet
at your convenience to receive any new information you may have prepared and
to discuss the service contract. To date Iowa City has not received a reply
We remain ready to meet at your convenience.
The City of Iowa City has begin preparation of the FY 78 budget. Because con-
tract negotiations have been so unproductive, Iowa City has deleted revenue
from University Heights after January 1, 1978, fiom the preliminary budget.
In addition, the various departments and utility services have initiated dis-
cussions as to what actions will be required to terminate services as of.
December 31,0 1977.
yours, _
City Dfanager
Is
cc: City Council - Iowa City
City Council - University Heights
City Attorney - Iowa City
City Attorney - University Heights
2282
City of lova Ci�
EMOR 41V
UM
TO: City CouncilCitDATE: December is
y 1�tana$er, Clayton 1976
FROM: Carol deProsse �nggenberg
RE: Meeting of December g, 1976 - City Goals and objectives
I have identified
You may have the followin
the Co others. 8 issues as a result of
Council is concerned believe mine all addressour
about to Some relate directlyresolved meeting last week.
impact the undertake; some are less s to the budget
as
get too, specific for the g t P c ss we are
moment, but eventually
1. Snow removal and treatment of icy conditions
2. Trash collection fee
-3• Cemetery
4.rp1 rt; Commission and land
s' and kind
6•
Environmentalua recreation se
7• Growtyq quality
T�ces to be Provided
to citizens
City of Iowa Cit •
DATE: December 14, 1976
TO: Neal Berlin, City Manager
FROM: Dennis E. Showalter Director of Parks
' � Recreation
RE: Advisability of Covering the Mercer Park Pool
It is my opinion that it is inadvisable
Park pool for year-round operation for
1
2.
3.
/ef
to cover the Mercer
the following reason
mere is no boiler to heat the building or the
water and inadequate existing space to install
one;
There is no insulation in the building;
People don't like a covered pool for summer use.
If a bubble is used as a cover in the winter and
removed in the summer, it would involve a lot of
labor. Bubbles are expensive to heat in the
winter. Their normal life expectancy is 5 to 9
years.
cc ' � Po" ( ,ti'lyi
2 2$W
Fit
0 City of Iowa CiA
MEMORANDUM
DATE: December 6, 1976
TO: John Hayek, City Attorney
FROM: Bob Bowlin, Asst. City Attorney
RE: Annexation to the City of Coralville
Dear John:
I have reviewed the City precinct descriptions with Dennis
Gannon of the Public Works Dept, and we do not believe that the
recent annexation of land City to
formerly in the City of Iowa
the City of Coralville requires any change in the description
Of the boundary lines of precinct 8. As far as I can tell, this
matter is now closed. If you have any questions, John, please
let me know. Thank you.
2-:
CC: Abbie Stolfus, City Clerk
Z 2 S,S
�7777
1pzgidivy
Mh
to:
Want3TtOl6fi1]d,�nn..
• City of Iowa City
MEMORANDUM
DATE: December 9, 1976
TO: City Council
FROM: Julie Vann, CDBG Program Coordinator
RE: CCN Proposed CDBG FY '78 Budget
Attached you will find:
I. The CCN budget recommendations (gold)
2. A summary of the intent of each project
3. The CCN minutes from December 1 and 7
November 29th also) (Please review copies of minutes from
4. The summary of the public meeting held December 8th.
The Committee on Community Needs has been working hard gathering citizen input
to determine a budget for presentation to you. Three neighborhood meetings, two
public meetings, news bulletins, and radio shows were used to involve the general
public in the process. With citizen proposals gathered, three CCN committee
meetings were held to evaluate each and every proposal. A budget was developed
and discussed at yet another public meeting this past Wednesday. THEY ARE TRYING
HARD TO DO A GOOD JOB FOR YOU. CCN members have good rationale for each proposal.
I know -- I listened to all their discussions.
The attached budget is now presented to you for consideration. Do contact CCN
members if you want additional details. Committee members do plan to attend the
informal council discussion of the programs. Having worked so hard to finalize
this proposed budget, they will expect justification for any alterations. Now it's
up application. HappytHolidays!7,sct� finalize � he budget for the third year
v (J
JV/ssw
cc: Committee on Community Needs 6Iembers
PROPOSED COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT.BUDGET'.
URBAN RENEWAL
$412,200
CODE ENFORCEMENT
;15,000
HOUSING REHABILITATION
350,000.,
RALSTON CREEK
S00,000.
.JOHNSON COUNTY ASSOC, OF RETARDED
CITIZENS 50CQQ.
CONKLIN LANE SHELTER
4,P'500-:
COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING
130, 000':
_ OLD POST OFFICE
250,000;
MAYORS YOUTH PROGRAM
3,000'
RECYCLING/ENERGY CONSERVATION
50, 000;`
HAPPY HOLLOW PARK
50, 000':
RAPE VICTIM ADVOCACY PROGRAM
OLD BRICK
40, 000
BUSES FOR THE HANDICAPPED AND
ELDERLY- . 30, 000
CONTINGENCY
14: 800
ADMINISTRATION
160,000
TOTAL 3RD YEAR ALLOCATION
$2,061,000
12'm-7 76'
4
5.
0 9
SUMMARY OF 19(O(;RM1,S pROpOSI:D
l• Urban Renewal -- $412,200 is set aside to fulfill lR1D requirements mandating
decision, 1C[IUD decided ttoshold nbackas p20o1ofeourFollowing
the May,
we demonstrated active efforts to closeout the R_ oc 1976' court
daliscussions, we agreed to utilize clo Grant allocation unless
0 of the first4three projeallocationster sfor rR-14
land acquisition. We are committed to fulfill this agreement.
2. Code Enforcement-- $15,000 is all to continue the minimum housing code
systematic inspection
January, 4111 houprogram. Since the inception of the program last
sing units have been inspected in the core of Iowa City.
The following are included in next year's program plans:
a• rein included
will be needed for structures cited to make repairs, to
restore dint, safe and sanitary housing conditions.
b• a Program will be develoed to systematically continue the inspection
process throughout the city.
C. review expansion of target arca should be considered and if an environmental
al
mpact
inspections, thennthisltoolshouldbbeccarriednouthwithor-tothir-door
3• Housing Rehabilitation year funds.
$350 000 is allocated to neighborhood improvement/
housing rehabilitation activities. The
program has been soundly developed
and success is expected. The goals of this
are similar
ogram
HUD -- to improve living environments for lowrand moderate incomeofathose
miliesf
and to provide more decent, safe, and sanitary housing.
To continue plans and expectationsbudget is
third CDBG year.
This allocation will , a good sized bneeded during the
homeowners, 30-50 loans (depending on how the loan program develops), $90,000 for site iprovide approximately grants top ed mprovements, such as alley, sidewalk, or street repairs.
e and
Ralston Creek Flood Control -- $500,000 has been set aside to start implement
the June
ing projects expected to be ud
incled in
It is proposed that two dams be constructed east '76Iowaers-Willis report.
Boulevard area between Court Street andOf City (in the Scott
watershed of the southern branch of RalstonrCreekican Legpoweion rs3Villiscgues�timated
the project cost to be $665,000, but when questioned by CCN members, admitted
the figures were very soft. The committee reduced the amount to 5500,000.
J.C. Association of Retarded Citizens
acquisition for a retarded citizen cen--ter'
50,000was a for lan
nd pin requestedthe on Adult
in less than appropriate acco
Center has provided day care alanned activities for retarded adults, but
mmodations. An architecturally barrier -free
structure is needed. The JARC (non-profit organization) will be able to
construct the building if land acquisition costs are met.
11
Q41
•
6• Conklin Land/1
lickor 11!11 !'ark She _ r
and Recreation Commission - $4,-'00 was
water to the to wild a
iter
_ requested by the Parks
Fire Girls t have raised - at the north entrance - providing restrooms and running
raised j1,200 in hopes to Hickory 11111 Park. The Cam
Longer term activities could be P that the shelter p
were available (e. planned for the would be constructed.
g•, camping)• park if these facilities
7• Comprehensive Plan -
hensive plan activitiesl30,000 inclludinas been allocated for the final
input and background technical g completion of the document, year compre-
ahead if the City Plan and new reports in hand a lYith citizen
1978• Also, funds zoning ordinance areto
be of policymaking is
1978-.n are in to continue support be adopted b
Planning human Needs research. PPort to Johnson Count June,
$• Old Post Office Ac uisition _ Y Regional
post office structure for renov$250,000 has been allocated
project site plans suggest to acquire the old
commercial, ggest a complex of facilities citizen's center. Developing
and recreational facilities. , including housing,
be the community center of activities and organpost izations serving
structure would
9- Ma Or's Youth Pro ram - serving elderly citizens.
summer prOgr�• CCN mem ersOwereaverytsuside to fund a
assure coordination of m ere 's Youth pro supervisor for the
DBG
Creek clean uram with of the program and wanted to
efforts. P, Playground000 wassetgasident con�truction,CnProjects such eighborhood clean u Ralston
The $3 aside to
10. Recycling R•....___ __ . _ support the proposed idea, p
to work s "" Or which --" D50,000 was ea
pacifically on ener (I) 10,000 is to employ an individualearmarked
recycling program, and gY conservation issues and
program. Iowa PIRG nd (2)c$40,000 is for implementationhofdthel recd ng a
(labor intensive the several types
recycling
Programs are capitol intensive and energylabor
in recycling
less expensive and could be intensive)
Although CCN members favored feasibil , labor intensive
feasibilitythe labor Y developed in Iowa City.
study could be done with intensive approach,
inadequate solution. $40,000 if the formerthey indicated a
appeared to be an
11. Happ�low park Expansion
acquisition 50'000 is the amount ea
should be Although there was some co rmarked for
used for both watershed some
committee division on whethertheark
land
should
activities, the co (Ralston Creek the land
additional o committee has set aside funds to project) and recrea-
tional
space per northside neighborhood re acquire the land for
12• Ra a Victim Advocacypro quests.
costs and Publicityram -- $1.500 was set aside for workshops,
members w t costs. Several rapes occurred P Printing
were sensitive to the problem and just last week. CCN
and phone calls urging financial support. had received
Women's Resource pport. The numerous letters (13)
Center and our police Department. will be used by the
-3-
13. Old Brick -
Brick. - $40,000 was allocated to begin rehabilitation work for Old
to attract la matching grant very, very controversial. The money
be used for ematchingxterior rehant of pieservation funds would be used
after which the total would
interior preparations for occupancy.
14. Buses for the liandica ed and Elderl
for one or two vehicles suitable $30,000 was
for transporting set aside for acquisition
is concern that adequate fundingg wheelchair occupants. There
By utilizing CDBG funds for vehicle acquisition, ofavailable er insure
for operating costs. , other funds program success.
can be reserved
11
7.
4
s
COA6MIT E -E ON CMMUNITY NEEDS
DECEMBER 1, p,m,
1976 -- 4:00
IOWA CITY RECREATION CENTER
RO%1 A
Ca%'3417TEE MEMBERS PRESENT
COIITIEE MEMBERS ABSENT:
CITY STAFF PRESENT:
•
Hauer, Amidon, Askerooth, Bolnick, Bonney, Dennis,
Hall, Hibbs, Stockman, Bohlken, Coogan
Bridgeman
Vann, Wilkinson
SMSIARY OF ITEMS DISCUSSED:
1• It was moved b
November moved
y Hibbs and seconded by Hall that the November 22
1976, minutes be approved. Motion carried.
2. Vann distributed the 1976, and
Child Care) Committee.This writtenproProposal
by q_C iCommunity Coordinated
on November
P supported their oral presentation
3• Askerooth info
Manager regarded the committee of a letter he had
In light of the fact that residency requirement as received from the City
he be allowed that he now resides set forth in the Committee Bylaws.
resignation. that
Hibbs moved and Bolnick secondedthat the Coit accept
resignation with regret. The motion
carried with
Committee
2 2 voting "nay.,, h's
As an update on the Park and Recreation Co
the Conklin Street Park, Stockman re
$1500 that "Mission request for a shelter ed
is to be car -marked for ported that a citizensat
this shelter, group has raised
In answer to some
answers / explanations:uestions from Committee members
and/or Vann supplied the following
a improvs Youth Board -- Their request was that neighborhood
improvement activities be funded that would
ejobsand park
b• Old Provide jobs for the youth.
Playground equipment from City Park is being
and Reno parks. Thus, the citizen requests used for the Brookland
During the discussions of q have been taken care of.
for a traffic light on Of project proposals
and the reDubuqueStreet for it was recommended that the re
quest for additional street lights at Ma quest
to the Public Works Department. ghts on Mayflower b Apartments
Mormon Trek Road be forwarded
After a lengthy discussion of the 34 proposals for
the following as priorities to receive further consideration:
funding, the Committee listed
S.
Committee on Co • •
December 1 mmunity Needs
Page 2 • 1976
a• Old Post Office Acquisition for senior
b. Neighborhood Park Improvements
c. Ralston Creek Improvementscenter (g)
d. Mayor's Youth Prgm(8)(g)
e• Land acquisition for retarded citizens'
f• Recycling Program and Ener
g• Ha center (7)
Happy Hollow Park Expansion(7)Planning (7
h. Day Care facilities - )
i• Riverfront Land AcquisitionYouterm (6
)/child Old Brick ( )child day long (3)
k Ra restoration (q)
k Mark Iictim Nei Advocacy (q
M. Mar IV Neighborhood Center (4)
n• Buses • etc., office space (2)
for handicapped (2)
Following is .a listin
for each decision: g of the tentative
amounts allocated and the rationale
a• Old Post Office -
allocated for the- Rolnick moved and Dennis
the following acquisition of the old Post
that $250,000 be
involved g two points were Office. In the discussion
in the development made: (1) that CCN members
for acquisition Pment of the center and should be
request to tIOn,reallbecomes available, CCN ranshould(2) that, if other funding
renovation. The motioncate CDA tto setdasiIncludin Presented with any
voting against, acquisition sals the structure's
q carried with one
A discussion of the proposal's
(1) The Old Post Office assets would identified
center Provide a the following;
centrally located in Iowa Citylmcloselocatoon for a senior
and easy to get to by car or bus.
(2) The Hansen- the downtown shopping,
Lind -Meyer Proposal includes a multi -unit structure elderly housing adjoining the senior center.
(3) The Post Office might also of
organizations Provide office space for other
in the downtown area.
community
b. Park Improvements
allocate Shelterlatck moved
and Dennis seconded that $4,500 be
Motion carried with one abstaining.
entrance to Hickory Hill Park.
Assets of the proposal included the following:
(1) Predominately low -moderate income famili
Conklin Street area. es
(2) Significant are living in the
resident contributions�d are
has been shown b
(3) The addition of y $1.500 of
the Funning water and restrooms will allow more use of
park (possibly for overnight camping).
Committee on Community Needs
December 1, 1976
Page 3
c. Mayor's Youth Program -- Bolnick moved and Bohlken seconded that $3,000 be
allocated for hiring of a supervisor for the summer work program.
carried unanimously. Motion
The rationale for setting funds aside for this program follows:
(1) The youth need some supervision during their work projects.
(2) If money is set aside for the program, it is more likely to be
implemented.
(3) A program to utilize youth from the neighborhood's of low and
moderate income families for neighborhood and park revitalization seems
very beneficial.
d. Retarded Citizens Center -- Stockman moved and Dennis seconded that $50,000
be allocated or land
unanimously. acquisition for Nelson Adult Center. Motion carried
The rationale supporting this allocation included:
(1) This is a non-profit project funded predominately by friends and
parents of retarded citizens. The group has identified funding for
the construction of the building and HCDA appears to be the only source
of a federal grant for land acquisition.
(2) The current location of Nelson Adult Center is too small and unaccessible
to wheelchairs, they need a new site to meet their growing needs.
(3) JARC is a stable organization with ongoi
sources. ng programs and other funding
e. Recycling and Energy Conservation -- Bolnick moved and Stockman seconded
that x`50,000 be allocated for (1) a neighborhood recycling program ($40,000)
and (2) an energy conservation planner ($10,000). After some discussion,
the motion was amended to include the stipulation that if a labor intensive
program proves infeasible, then a technical, feasibility study can be
carried out with these funds. Motion carried with three opposed.
The rationale for including this proposal included:
(1) Conservation of resources is a must in the future. One local staff
member should be assigned to conservation and environmental research.
(2) Labor intensive recycling has been successful in other states and
proven less costly than other types of recycling. With the decreasing
number of available landfill sites, something must be done in Iowa Ctiy.
f. Happy Hollow Park Expansion -- Hauer moved and Bolnick seconded that $50,000
be allocated to acquire the vacant land adjoining Happy Hollow Park. Motion
carried with one abstaining.
® 0
Committee on Community Needs
December 1, 1976
Page 4
The supporting justifications included:
(1) The Ralston Creek Flood Control project could then use the entire open
space for water retention during major storms.
(2) The neighborhood residents are anxious to retain the open space for
recreational activities. Several residents requested the park's
expansion.
The remaining projects will be discussed at the meeting on Tuesday, December 7,
at 7:30 p.m. in the Recreation Center.
8. Dennis moved and Bohlken seconded that the meeting be adjourned. Motion
carried.
Sandra a Wilkinson
0 0
COhAf 11'1,I:E ON COMMUNITY NEEDS
DECEMBER 7. 1976 -- 7:30 p.m.
IOWA CITY RECREATION CENTER
ROOM A
COMMITTEE MEMBERS PRESENT:
Hauer, Rolnick, Bonney, Dennis, Hall, Hibbs, Stockman,
Bohlken
COMMITTEE MEMBERS ABSENT: Amidon, Bridgeman, Coogan
CITY STAFF PRESENT: Vann, Wilkinson
SUMMARY OF ITEMS DISCUSSED:
1• Hauer stated that she would like to assert "Chair's
adjournment time of 10:00 p.m. The suggestion met with
prerogative" and set an
2. The Committee continued Committee approval.
their considerations and discussions for funding:
a. Day Care facilities -- After some discussion of Purchasing
ucture
versus readily available structures
day care in the homes (Horace Mann School and aOld rBrick ) and
organized well enough�tthe consensus was that the residents are not
Proposals were tabled. get a successful program going. The day care
b. Riverfront land ac uisition -- Realizing that there wasn't enough to satis y all uncing
funding that could requests,the Committee tried to identify money
nt
moved and Bohlken seconded thated for RRiverfuture
verfrrontlanlacquisition be deferred,
property acquisition. Hauer
but given high priority with the next available Block Grant funding
(either money from the sale of Urban Renewal land or the fourth
CDBG allocation) and that it be noted that this is done with extreme
regret. Motion carried with one Year
Opposed.
c• MSO-0—be—allocated
apc Victim Advocacy n ram�_
J�1Sf)D be allocated for the Rape Victim kAdvocac moved and Stockman seconded that
conjunction with the Cit P
y of Iowa Cit y Program to be used in
printing costs, and workshops directed towardbthelhiyl ghduplication and
increased security, it was also recommended that an alternate use for
. part of this money could be the For
purchase of a bulk number of dead bolt
locks to give "at cost" or free to residents in high crime areas. Motion
carried with one opposed.
Assets of the program are:
(1) Rape and assaults are a serious problem.
(2) The Women's Resource and Action Center
the public on these issues. is actively trying to inform
Committee on Community Needs
December 7, 1976
Page 2
d. Old Brick --
A discussion of the positive aspects of this funding were:
(1) Matching funds are available for historic preservation, so $40,000
might realize $80,000 of improvements.
(2) The building would provide space for neighborhood and community
services.
(3) Bus lines are nearby and the building is accessible to the handicapped.
Negative comments included:
(1) Other structures in the area already provide space for similar
activities, e.g., Center East, Horace Mann School, Wesley House,
Lutheran Church.
(2) It was questioned whether enough funding would ever be available to
make this a successful long term venture. (Other members disagreed.)
Bolnick moved and Bonney seconded that $40,000 be allocated for renovation
of Old Brick with the understanding that the City would work out an agreement
allowing neighborhood citizen groups to use space in the building, possibly
rent free. The first vote was 3 for, 3 against and 1 abstaining.
Vann called the members who were absent in an attempt to get more members
present. Dennis arrived shortly thereafter and a second vote on the above
motion carried with 5 for and 3 opposed.
e. Buses for the Handicapped -- Don Schaefer of Johnson County Regional Planning
arrived to discuss transportation for the handicapped. After his presenta-
tion requesting $30,000 for the purchase of two vans to be used for the
handicapped, Bolnick moved and Bonney seconded that even though the
discussion had taken place, the vote should be deferred until after the
Committee discussed agenda items listed before this topic on its priority
list. Motion carried unanimously.
After the remaining priorities were discussed, Hibbs moved and Bonney
seconded that $30,000 be allocated for the acquisition of two buses for
the handicapped and elderly. Motion carried unanimously.
Assets of the proposal included:
(1) Transportation is needed for these two groups.
(2) The transit grant will not cover capital acquisitions.
f. Mark Iy Neighborhood Center -- Bolnick moved and Stockman seconded that
X15,000 be allocated for recreational facilities in the Mark IV/Willow
Creek area. Motion failed with 5 opposed.
® .%
Committee on Community Needs
December 7, 1976
Page 3
3. Dennis asked that llauer as Chairperson write letters
Proposals stating why they were or were not funded.
agreement.
0
to all those who submitted
The Committee was in full
4 lessathaneconsensus that
the$50,000 allocated, 1the eexcess 1shouldabeareallocatedytoo
Ralstone
Creek.
S. Hauer asked if there were any additions or corrections to the minutes of
December 1, 1976.
Bolnick suggested that a third rationale be added under item "e. Recycling and
Energy Conservation" to read (3) The City's Comprehensive Plan Work Program
discusses recycling and feasibility studies. This proposal will serve as a
Pilot demonstration program.
Stockman suggested that in item "f. Happy Hollow Park Expansion" a statement
be added that the abstaining vote was cast on the basis of a controversy over
the duel usage of the park for recreation and storm water retention.
Dennis moved and flail seconded that the minutes be approved as amended. Motion
carried.
6. Bonney moved and Bohlken seconded that the meeting be adjourned. Motion
carried.
Sandra S. {Vilkinson
•
PUBLIC MEETING
COM 117TEE ON COMMUNITY NEEDS
DECEMBER 81 1976 -- 1:30 p.m.
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
COMMITTEE MEMBERS PRESENT:
COMMITTEE MEMBERS ABSENT:
CITY STAFF PRESENT:
0
CITIZENS PRrswr : 25
(not including CCN or staff)
Hauer, Amidon, Bolnick,
Hibbs, Stockman, Bohlken
Bonney, Coogan
Vann, Wilkinson, Berlin
Bridgeman, Dennis, Hall,
SUMMARY OF ITEMS DISCUSSED:
I• Chairperson Hauer opened the meeting by saying that this was a meeting for
citizen reaction to the proposed budget that the Committee will present to
City Council.
2• Allen Wolfe, 1210 Grant Court, expressed his concern for the Ralston Creek
area. He strongly advocated support of the pr
for supporting the program. ogram and thanked the Committee
He also expressed a need for a centralized downtown bus depot that would
include a waiting area, restrooms and lockers. He mentioned that the Old
Post Office might be a possibility.
3. Lorada Cilek, 404 Brown, expressed her concern for the youth of the community.
She suggested a work program for juveniles that would not only benefit the
community but would also help rehabilitate juveniles. She stated that she
felt the amount allocated for the Mayor's Youth Program was a teribly small
amount and she felt the money allocated for Old Brick might better be used
for youth work.
4. Jen Madsen, 1315 Whiting Avenue Ct., expressed her disagreement with the Old
Brick allocation. She and many others present were very distressed and upset
at the idea of supporting the Old Brick issue. Committee members Hauer and
Hibbs each voiced their strong opposing views about the project's feasibility,
use, and urgency.
Robert Dykstra, 314 S. Summit Street, and others present then voiced the
positive aspects of historical preservation in general support of Old Brick.
S. In answer to questions of why Happy Hollow and the Conklin shelter were not
routinely funded through Parks and Recreation, the Committee responded that
several citizens had expressed an interest in them as neighborhood improve-
ment projects.
C�
Public Meeting -- CCN
December 8, 1976
Page 2
•
6. It was explained that the Comprehensive Plan is funded because
HDD mandates
comprehensive program development and evaluation.
7. It was explained that the proposal from the Rape Victim
included several ineligible items.
P Advocacy Program
worthy of some support and thus allocated ethe th1500. Ther felt the
from those present that this There was much
good.
amount would be insufficient to do much good.
8. Several citizens expressed their disappointment that a
Pool was not funded. They stated that there are
help another public indoor swimming
sources of r pool
gto be builtailable The committee stated pthat ethere ady owere aalternate
is planning to build a mentioning specifically that the school board
pool in the future.
9. Jim Shank of Goodwill stated that $75,000 of HCDA funds were allocated for
the Goodwill workshop program in 1975, fie said that he felt Goodwill was
Still willing to develop programs for senior citizens and handicapped and
the Old Post Office could provide the space needed.
10. Dennis moved and Hibbs seconded that the meeting be adjourned. Motion
carried.
Sane c `
•kinson —�---
® 6 3C G c
ECONQ,IIC DEW-LON-ENT _ C(D,,,IP Sh jp`
F�STVE PLAN
1. What kind of economic development does Iowa City want? Flow much? what
constraints should we put on development?
2. What do we have to offer? }that are our assets and how can we make the
most of them?
3. What do we have working against us? Competition with other locations?
How can we minimize these liabilities?
4. Should land be set aside for this purpose? If so, how much and where?
5- What amenities should be provided? Public and private?
6. What tools are available to use to attract and leverage investment?
7. Who will plan? 19110 will implement? Role of City (Council and staff),
University, business community, Iowa Development Commission
a- research
b. publicity
c. finance
d- putting a deal together
8. Khat are the appropriate_ ` and necessary costs of initiating and carrying out
an ongoing program of economic development in Iowa City? }yho should bear
those costs?
SEPARATING THE GOOD FROM THE BAD: RATING ASSESSORS' PERFORNUWCES IN ]975
by Steven Gold, Associate ProEesser, Department of.Economi.cs, Drake
University.
LETTER FROM VICTOR J. BELGER, IO'YA CITY ASSESSOR, PROPOSED BUDGET FOR 7.Avs
1977-1978; includes copy of proposed budget.
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING - BUDGET ESTINIATE Fy JULY 1, 1977 -- JUNE 30, 1978. A%qB q
PROPOSED COM,RjNTIY DEVELOPNIEW BLOCK GRANT BUDGET T, SUMRY OF PROGR4S
PROPOSED 2 %sq p
9
SEPARATING THE GOOD FROM THE HAD;
RATING ASSESSORS' PERFORMANCES IN 1975
Dr, Steven Gold
Associate Professor
Department of Economics
Drake University
October, 1976
�01� GkF Od
2287
s 9
Assessors have a vitally important job, affecting the
payments of every property tax payer. Although it is
Probably widely understood that some assessors perform
better than others, very few citizens know which assessors
are the best and which the worst. This paper reports the
results of the first study which ranks assessors according
to how well they do their jobs. The major conclusions are
as follows:
-----There is enormous variation in the quality of assess-
ments, with the portion of Scott County outside of Davenport
having the best record and Ringgold County the worst. over-
all ratings are shown in Tables 1 and 2.
-----According to widely -used norms, at most 31 of the 118
assessment jurisdictions in the state (99 counties and 19
cities) can be said to have an "acceptable" level of
assessment performance. Scott is the only county where
assessment is "excellent.,-'
-----Assessments clearly tend to be more accurate in cities
and urban counties than in rural counties with small
Populations.
-----In every assessment jurisdiction except one (Cherokee
County) there is a tendency to overassess low -value homes
relative to high-value homes.
-----Assessment performance was slightly better in 1975 than
in 1974. This may be because all assessors were supposed to
reassess property in 1975.
2
Table 1
Overall Ratings
1 Scott
2 Iowa City*
41 Hamilton
42
80 Bremer
3 Johnson
4
Lee
43 Emmet
81 Lyon
Ames*
5 Polk
44 Crawford
82 Muscatine County
83
6 Newton*
45 Marshall
46 Clinton*
Iowa
84 Hancock
7 Dubuque*
8 Kossuth
47 Dallas
85 Worth
9 Ft. Madison*
48 Montgomery
49
87 Wright
Tama
10 Linn
11 Winnebago
Buchanan
50 Cerro Gordo
88 Boone*
89 Oskaloosa*
12 Cherokee
51 Dickinson
90 Butler
13 Floyd
14
52 Jackson
53 Clarke
91 Madison
Allamakee
15 Mills
54 Howard
92 Guthrie
93
16 Benton
55 Mason City*
56
Story
94 Decatur
17 Fayette
18 Buena
Monroe
57 Plymouth
95 Des Moines County
Vista
19 Black Hawk
58 Greene
96 Audubon
97 Union
20 Henry
59 Waterloo*
60 Cedar
98 Franklin
21 Sac
22 Warren
61 Pocahontas
99 Keokuk County
00
23 Cedar Rapids*
62 Chickasaw
63
anooe
101 Ottumwa*
24 Palo Alto
Fort Dodge*
64 Winneshiek
102 Louisa
25 Clinton County65
26
M
Marion
103 Clayton
Sioux City*
27
65 Davis
104 Pottawattamie
Washington
28
67 Jones
105 Harrison
Grundy
29 Clay
68 Keokuk*
106 Mahaska
107
30 Dubuque County
69 Monona
70 Jasper
Woodbury
108 Calhoun
31 Des Moines*
32 Paye
71 Delaware
109 Adair
110
33 Shelby
72 Osceola
73 Poweshiek
Cass
111 Mitchell
34 Davenport*
35
74 Webster
112 Van Buren
Boone Count
35 Adams y
75 Muscatine*
113 O'Brien
114
37 Humboldt
76 Sioux
77
Wayne
115 Taylor
38 Marshalltown*
Carroll
78 Lucas
116 Wapello
39 Jefferson
40
79 Hardin
117 Fremont
Ida
118 Ringgold
Notes: * indicates
Assessors.
City Assessor; all
others
are County
In case of ties, assessor with better coefficient of
dispersion was ranked higher.
0
Table 2
Assessment Quality Rated on Three Scales
County or City Accuracy Regressive Bias Overall
Adair
Adams
107
109
109
Allamakee
33
39
36
Appanoose
99 16
14
Audubon
86
98T
100
Benton
14
98
96
Black Hawk
22
16
--Waterloo
59
20
19
Boone
54
58
59
--Boone
85
13
35
Bremer
78
88
83
88
Buchanan
51
80
Buena Vista
15
47T
49
Butler
100
26
18
Calhoun
106
76
90
Carroll
79
110
108
Cass
108
B0
108
77
Cedar
62
110
Cerro Gordo
42
56
60
--Mason City
49
57
59
50
Cherokee
24
55
Chickasaw
6
12
Clarke
60
68
62
Clay
27
41T
53
Clayton
103
28
102
29
Clinton
35
103
--Clinton
43
14
25
Crawford
52
46
Callas
41
43
44
Davis
84
55
49
47
Decatur
97
84
66
Delaware
69
94
Des Moines
89
73
93
71
Dickinson
56
95
Dubuque
46
44T
51
--Dubuque
9
30
Emmet
39
10
7
Fayette
4
51
43
Floyd
20
36
17
Franklin
101
12
13
Fremont
117
90
98
Greene
117
117
Grundy
31
62
58
Guthrie
93
23
28
Hamilton
44
85
92
Hancock
92
40
41
Hardin
70
72
84
91
79
County or City
4
Harrison
1lccuracv
Regressive
— Bias
Overall
Henry
105
105
Howard
12
32
105
Humboldt
45
60
20
Ida
38
35
54
Iowa
55
27
37
Jackson
82
81T
40
Jasper
47
59
83
--Newton
64
77
52
Jefferson
5
11
70
Johnson
34
47T
6
--Iowa City
3
q
39
Jones
2
5
3
Keokuk
90
45
44T
2
Kossuth
98
67
Lee
18
l
99
--Ft. Madison
40
46
8
--Keokuk
6
17
42
Linn
73
66
9
--Cedar Rapids
11
15
68
Louisa
10
38
10
Lucas
102
189
23
Lyon
71
102
Madison
B3
78
78
Mahaska
81
96
81
--Oskaloosa
109
106
91
Marion
95
81T
106
Marshall
G5
67
89
--Marshalltown
32
63
65
Mills
36
41T
45
Mitchell
16
19
38
Monona
110
111
15
Monroe
75
64
111
Montgomery
80
29
69
Muscatine
48
50
56
--Muscatine
87
75
48
O'Brien
76T
74
82
Osceola
113
112
75
Page
76T
69
113
Palo Alto
26
31
72
Plymouth
19
30
32
Pocahontas
S7
53
24
Polk
58
61
57
--Des Moines
13
2
61
Pottawattamie
23
33
5
Poweshiek
104
104
31
Ringgold
67
104
Sac
118
118
73
Scott
9
37
118
--Davenport
1
3
21
30
34
1
34
Ratings are based on normal residential deed transactions
for 1975 as reported in the Department of Revenue's Real
Estate Assessment Sales Ratio Study,
Accuracy is measured by the coefficient of dispersion, which
measures the degree to which individual assessment ratios
vary from the median ratio.
Regressive bias is measured by the regression index, which is
t e ratjo of the mean to the weighted assessment ratio. This
index indicated that higher -value property tended to be
underassessed in every county except one, Cherokee. The
rankings indicate the degree to which the index differs from
100, which represents no bias for or against high-value
property.
In calculating the overall ratin , the first two columns were
weighted equally.
T indicates that there was a tie.
County or City
Accy
Re ressive Bias
g
s
Overall
Shelby
Sioux
37
68
21
33
Story
88
86
76
--Ames
7
92
93
Tama
74
7
4
Taylor
115
97
87
Union
91
116
115
Van Buren
111
95
97
Wapello
116
113
112
--Ottumwa
96
115
116
Warren
28
107
101
Washington
�9
18
22
Wayne
114
24
27
Webster
63
114
114
--Fort Dodge
61
87
74
Winnebato
21
70
63
Winneshiek
8
11
Woodbury
66
65
64
--Sioux City
112
25
103
107
Worth
94
25
26
Wright
72
71
85
94
85
Notes:
Ratings are based on normal residential deed transactions
for 1975 as reported in the Department of Revenue's Real
Estate Assessment Sales Ratio Study,
Accuracy is measured by the coefficient of dispersion, which
measures the degree to which individual assessment ratios
vary from the median ratio.
Regressive bias is measured by the regression index, which is
t e ratjo of the mean to the weighted assessment ratio. This
index indicated that higher -value property tended to be
underassessed in every county except one, Cherokee. The
rankings indicate the degree to which the index differs from
100, which represents no bias for or against high-value
property.
In calculating the overall ratin , the first two columns were
weighted equally.
T indicates that there was a tie.
C�
0
6
-----There was a strong tendency for areas with either good
or bad assessment performance in 1974 to have a similar
quality of assessment in 1975.2
-----In 11 of the 19 cases in which a county has both a city
assessor and a county assessor, the city assessor has a
higher ranking.
Some of the material on which this study is based is
necessarily quite technical. In order to increase the
readability of this report, two appendices have been provided.
One summarizes the structure of Iowa's property tax assess-
ment system, and the other explains the measures on which the
conclusions are based.
METHODS EMPLOYED
This study is based upon analysis of normal deed sales
of homes in cities and towns during 1975 as reported by the
Department of Revenue in its Real Estate Assessment/Sales
Ratio Study. These points should be noted:
-----Conclusions are based only on sales of homes, ignoring
other types of transactions, such as sales of farms or busi-
nesses. This procedure is used because home sales are much
more plentiful, and therefore conclusions can be more
certain. In nearly all jurisdictions, a substantial
majority of all normal transactions are sales of homes.
-----The Department of Revenue has eliminated many trans-
actions from the sample which it considers abnormal, for
example, sales between family members, forced sales, and
0 •
contract sales. 7
-----Only 1975 sales were considered in making the rankings.
However, 1974 assessment patterns and sales were also
analyzed as an ancillary part of the study.
Two aspects of assessment performance were considered:
accuracy and bias
between high- and low -value property.
Accurate assessment entails making the ratio of assessed
value to sales price equal for all property. In fact, in
the most accurate county there was a nine percent deviation
from the median ratio. It can be said in this case that there
was on the average a nine percent error in assessments. In
the average jurisdiction, this error was 23 percent. In
Ringgold County, it was 87 percent.
Fair assessment also requires that the ratio of
assessed value to sales price be the same for high- and
low -value property. To the extent that high-value property
is underassessed, there is a regressive bias.
Table 2 shows the rankings of each assessment
tion on accuracy and regressive jurisdic-
the composite bias separately, as well as
how compo c ranking. Appendix B explains more precisely
Y and regressive bias are measured, with examples.
INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS
The rankings reported here do not necessarily reflect
the ability, effort, or honesty of the individuals
presently assessors. A number of factors who are
be kept in
mind in assessing the results.
1. For seven assessors, 1975 was the first year in
office. Most of them inherited positions in which their
Predecessors had done a sub -par job. One year is not long
enough to clean up a colossal mess. The seven relatively
new assessors are in Calhoun, Fremont, Hancock, O'Brien,
Sioux, Webster, and Marshalltown.3
z. In some cases, assessors do not have sufficient
funds to perform their functions properly. The Conference
Board which controls their budget sometimes starves them.
3. Outside firms have recently conducted major re-
appraisals in some places, such as Iowa City and Johnson
County. In these cases, the good ranking may not be due to
the assessor's own efforts.
4. The difficulty of assessing accurately depends upon
such factors as the rate at which property values are
changing and the frequency with which sales occur, some
assessors simply have tougher jobs than others.
5. 1975 is just one year, and some assessors may have
simply been lucky or unlucky. On the other hand, there were
not many big changes between the 1974 and 1975 rankings.
Despite all of these caveats applying to particular
cases, the rankings probably do in most cases reflect how
well individual assessors are doing their jobs.
POLICY IMPLICATIONS
This study graphically demonstrates the need for reform
of the property assessment system in Iowa. The present
11
0
E
decentralized system does not provide good assessment in most
parts of the state. state
Stronger state power is needed in some form. A
le
takeover of the assessment function seems like function
step, since property assessment is a technical
there is no reason for local control, and modern assessment
methods can more easily be implemented if jurisdictions are
large. Opponents of this proposal make two arguments.
First, there is a more personal relationship between assessor
and citizen if control is local. Second, the assessor
should be familiar with local conditions. Granting that
the assessor must understand the local market for property,
I see no reason why he needs to be appointed by a local
board. resent,
If a state takeover is too scary for the p
another attractive option is to set standards for accuracy
and regressivity, with removal
from office the penalty for
failing to meet the standards two years in a row.
evels of financial support
Failing even this, minimum l
could be mandated by the State, with or without State
financial contributions. Annual reassessments would also
help. Another implication of the results is that consolida-
tion of some assessment jurisdictions is advisable. The
Task. Force appointed by Governor Ray recently voted in
favor of a small step in this direction, proposing that
IN
to
city assessors be eliminated. Since, according to this
report, city assessors more often than not are more quali-
fied than their county counterparts, the merit of this
specific proposal is doubtful.
CONCLUSION
In this age when efficiency in government is highly
prized but notoriously elusive, the assessment function
stands out as one government activity in which it is quite
feasible to measure how well officials are performing. Hope-
fully in the future more attention will be paid to the data
accumulated by our Department of Revenue. Until now it has
been virtually ignored.
The way in which the property tax is assessed is a
disgrace. Since the property tax is not going to disappear
(nor should it), it is incumbent upon the Governor and
Legislature to deal with this issue in 1977.
APPENDIX A: THF n
TAX ASS
11
iV1 G('I
In Iowa, property values for tax purposes are set by
assessors, officials who are appointed by a Conference Board,
a committee consisting of representatives of bodies which
receive property tax revenue, such as cities, counties, and
school districts. Recently the examination which assessors
must pass before they are appointed has been stiffened, but
most assessors hold their positions from a time when the
exam was much easier. There is no requirement to appoint a
person who has a relatively high score, and in fact there
are said to be cases in which a Conference Board deliberately
passes over the most -qualified candidates.
Every other year the Department of Revenue issues
equalization orders which attempt to assure that all classes
of property in all jurisdictions are assessed at 100 percent
of market value (or, in the case of farmland, 50 percent of
market value and 50 percent of "productivity"). The Depart-
ment of Revenue may order revaluations, but it has no
authority to change property values within taxing jurisdic-
tions within classes of propertv. Only the assessor sets
these relative values, which determine property tax shares.
It is these relative values with which this study is con-
cerned.
Each of the 99 counties has an assessor. In addition,
19 of the largest cities have their own assessors. Thus,
there are 118 assessors.
nr ENDIX B: TECHNICAL EXPLANATION12
An assessment OF MEASURES
(AV) ratio (AR) is the
value /of a ratio of the assessed
piece of property
value) to its sales price (MV = market
Accuracy is measured by the coefficient Of dispersion,
which is equal to the average deviation from the median
assessment ratio, divided by the median assessment ratio.
For example, suppose that there are 5 properties, each
worth $50,000 (MV) and having assessed values (AV) of
$30,000, $40,000, $50,000,
$60,000, and $70 000 respectively.,
Thus assessment ratios would be 3/5 4/5 1, 6/5, and 7/5.
The median assessment ratio is 1. The average deviation
from the median AR is G
25 - 2/5 0+
5 1/5 + 2/5 .
Therefore the coefficient of dispersion (= avers
tion/median) is 6 9e devia-
tion/median) or 24 percent. This is very close to
the actual median coefficient of dispersion in Iowa, which
is 23 percent. If all property had the same AR, which would
be perfectly accurate assessment
this figure would be 0.
Regressive bias is measured by the regression coeffi-
cient, which is the mean AR divided by the weighted AR x 100.
The mean AR is simply the average of each AR. The weighted
AR is the sum of the AV divided'by the
example, sum of the MV. For
suppose that there are three properties, two of
which have market values of $40,000 and assessed values of
$20,000, so that AR
�- The other property has a market
value of $20,000 and an assessed value of $18,000, so
0
AR = 9/10.
0
13
Thus, low -value property is overassessed, since its AR
is higher. The mean AR is + � + 9/10_ 19 633 .
3 -
The weighted AR is 20 + 20 + 18 58
40+ 40+2 =1-60_ .58.
Thus, the regression index is .633/.58 x 100 = 109, which is
the average in Iowa.
Note the large inequities in both of these examples and
the fact that they fit the typical Iowa situation.
The coefficient of dispersion and regression index are
related although they measure different things. If the
regression index is different from 100, then the coefficient
of dispersion cannot be 0. But if the regression index is
equal to 100, then the coefficient of dispersion could have
any value. A situation in which the AR varied greatly but
not systematically with MV would have a high coefficient of
dispersion and a regression index equal to 100.
Coefficient of dispersion
Under 10
10-15
15.1-20
20.1-25
25.1-30
30.1-35
35.1-40
40.1-50
Over 50
TOTAL
Number of counties
1
13
17
35
24
13
7
5
3
e
Regression index
Under 3.00
100-105
105.1-110
110.1-115
115.1-120
120.1-125
125.1-130
Over 130
FOOTNOTES
e
Number of counties
1
26
35
34
10
5
3
4
14
1. According to Henry Aaron's Who Pa s the Pro ert Tax?
(Washington, D.C.: Brookings, 1975 p. 15, 'coe icients
of dispersion of less than 10 are regarded as signs of
administrative excellence while those between 10 and 20
indicate acceptable administration."
2. 11 of the 13 jurisdictions rated highest for accuracy
in 1975 were among the 20 best in 1974. Likewise, 9 of the
12 most inaccurate were among the 20 worst in 1974. The
carryover in regressivity bias was even greater. Analysis
of 1974 patterns was done by one of my students, Howard
Topping.
3. This information was provided by Michael Cox of the
Revenue Department. Although he was very helpful in answering
my questions, neither he nor anyone else associated with the
Department suggested that Z do this study or any of the
procedures used.
• Y
s
Ur -r -Ip'_ Or
CII y ,SSZZSS r�
VrG "0'- -I- r6ELGER
rOv"' CITY, lov"
D4cember h, 1976
Crar ronference 9oaro linmt�er:
bu, t'Ili1.1. find o r•vmn•
tr'.e• -0 3,01) ""a Iowa Cit.•! Wass,
50
my 1977-78 eropo^ed
so than. u}rer; :lrnr cn:g9 t.o t,}1e met,;, rce•
I ^.trim on Fk• jnr• for the i am d°Ine this
itrta.f. ?e"ember 20,4. 1915, a� �r.15PP}�,oatrftherdgnt
Citi' civic Center•, •::r,r wi7.7.
I have' a. had time to stud. Iowa
MY askinr.',. a3ways' trier) to be ver• v thr. budget.
The tot;;tl. amount to be rai.;rad3 conservative in
than it ::as Inst dear, by taxation
I hale is less
offico les' DeOPlr, working for me n"u t,
in ].e52. 1 dollht: that you :rill r than when I. took
T b, -r• office. flnst, of them have doub.i.e-ind histue in any
I bc,Iieve t•b':t in thin t:rn^ of office
Uab]n,force See 1952.
Tn m: office T irr:e o5 , experience is very in qualit:v not quant.it:y, arnl i u"ars of experience.
I believe
help is to nay a livim wa .,. believe the way to keep experinnre;?
3z "orlm;,In.`rsk. and for a mall. ratiseri.n ;a].e.ries, approximately
l.f and t p dcnut.,Y, and w., ;or ether personnel.
The i.htcc Lasinr
fair to me baiies c,' Iowa
a"" my employ and CrfY have n3'vd s been
return, c;e hay" always: or, I anpreeiate:
skandaid. „
! rrorred to keep 1,2e o . it: very much. In
He iI_ Ci f,'✓ / ae..^.sor Is p r= fi.ce Up }
in the local. t:axat.iorr f•,ce o a high
a "y:;tra is a very important; ce
t'_ deter•mirle th,_ When yc 1 consider•
Rriterp n ar'}'_1r't of Loxes ea::h i Id tnd fact that.
cis- pa7` in :.xrs inl •r' ual a
have. c yo" can ser-: the responsibility .rw!rss
ai.r an,l kin; rug 1ahj,1
tre:ai•ment. for all t,�xPrYr';s is a Host.
T am look'i nr, foI'ntrr'd to seeing :r nu on " ayei .
of Ucr•.rntrr, at our sc}te_du7^r! hearing.
1, thr. 20th
Sincerely yours,
.I
PLOr
City. Assessor of Iowa
0
OWFICPI or
CITY ASSESSOR
v:Croi J. GEL -GER
IVYJA CITY, IOWA
City Assessor
0coutY Asses^or
1st Assistant
2nd Assistant
Appraiser
Extra Help
Total Snlnr4,,-,
Offi.re T:x;;end?b�r�:;
'•'1or}cmen'.; Cor;�en�st.ian
St:ppl+�s
Board o!' Bn;rjq;{
Car Allowance
E:caminin;, Board
Assessor's School
Court Cysts
Telepnore
.,roup Life Iorurance
Blue Cross
Total
Total Bud;,et
�stimatel Balance
Ra -sed by Taxation
Social Srnurity
I P!s iiS
Total: Soc.Scclirit;,- Ipr.,Z
tort Liability
Total Budget
.. timate,' Balance
.Jaised P7 Taxation
Is
1975-77 1977-78
22,0'0
22,800
'
17,720
'
18,32b
15, °!+o
16, 7h0
15,81,0
16,020
15,300
16,200
h, 250
90, 970
i, 000
9� W,
3,500
Mona_
2,000
3,(MO
3,000
3,boo
b, 200
500
500
60
60
1,200
1,200
3,500
3,500
1.1,00
1,b00
2,500
2,000
3,000
3,600
21 0
109,830
115,54b
7,000
12,000
,
7, mo
6Y000
5 500
5,500
i25�
—11 —, Wo
None
172;3-5o
Mone
T27 OTI
7,000
12,000
115,330
11 0�i
I... e(neW F.,., 1611-613
NOTICE OF PUBLCC HEARING
BUDGET ESTID'IATE
Fiscal Year .luly 1.1977 -June 30,19'78
ASSESSOR of,Ckmm Iowa City, Iowa
tlr!/City of_.. -------------------------------
The Conference Board of this assessing jurisdiction will conduct a public ]tearing on the proposed
1977-78budgetat
Iowa City Civic Center, Iowa City, Iowa
January 11, 1977 beginning 7.30
on ------------- ------------- ----- gat_ -- o'clock ...p..m.
At the public hearing, any resident or taxpayer may present objections to, or arguments in favor of,
any part of the propose(] budget. Thi:; notice represents a summary of the supporting detail of
budget receipts and expenditures on file with the Conference Boar(] Clerk. Copies of the Supple-
mental Detail (Schedule 673-A) will be furnished any taxpayer upon request.
December 20, Victor J. Belger
- -. 1976 /s/ --- --- -------- ------- ------------- -------------------- Clerk
BUDGET ESTIMATE SUMMARY
FUND
(Use whole Dollars)
1. Assessment Expense
EXPENDITURES FOR YEAR
Estimate`)
cash
Reserve
7/1/78
Estimated
Balance
and All
Other
Receipts
(12 mos.)
Estimated
Amount
(C+D — Et
To Be Raised
By Taxation
(12 mos.)
1975-76
Actual
(I2 mus.)
1976-77
Actuni and
li:aim;tted
(i:: moa.)
109,830
aal 1, 197
Y
June :111197
I'ro osat
, P
(1L mos.)
101,3h6
115,5hh
--
12,000
103,5hh
d. F.I.C.A. (Federal)
h,536
7,000
6,000
_-
--
61000
3. I.P.E.R.s. (State)
2,02
5,500
5,5o0
--
--
5,5oo
-1. Special Appraisers
none
10,000
none
- _
I
none
i. Emergency
none
none
none
_--
none
G. Total
108, 35L
132,330
127, 01A
--
12,000
115,OLh
Taxation Rate per $1000 Valuation — $
INSTRUCTIONS
Only the notice and budget estimate summary are to be published. Schedule 673-A Supplemental
Detail is to be completes] before transferring details to Form 673 and to provide copies for any inter-
ested taxpayer and for attachment to certified budget copies. File one copy of the proof of publica-
tion with the county auditor. Amounts published in colunul C control expenditures and represent
maximum expenditures authorized by law for'certification.
ENTRY RECORD OF CONSIDERATION AND FILING OF ESTIMATE
On December 20, 19 76 ., the Conference Board met to consider and approve
for filing an(1 publication the proposed budget for the ensuing year. A quorum was present. The
Conference Board fixed the time and place for the public hearing on _.._January 11,
19 Z?_-.. at ---- 7 30..-- o'clock ...... p.m. at .....
-.... Iowa City Civic Center
--------------------------- — ----------
Iowa City, , Iowa Johnson County, lew:1. The Clerk was directed to publish the notice
ands mat Isummary is required by law.
j n
`\L
Clerk _ - - -, L-11L.I 1 ... �..__�'.lC.l i HCl l i dl�L. Chairman
PROPOSED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT BUDGET
URBAN RENEWAL
CODE ENFORCEMENT
HOUSING REHABILITATION
RALSTON CREEK
JOHNSON COUNTY ASSOC, OF RETARDED CITIZENS
CONKLIN LANE SHELTER
COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING
OLD POST OFFICE -
MAYOR'S YOUTH PROGRAM
RECYCLING/ENERGY CONSERVATION
HAPPY HOLLOW PARK
RAPE VICTIM ADVOCACY PROGRAM
OLD BRICK
BUSES FOR THE HANDICAPPED AND ELDERLY
CONTINGENCY
ADMINISTRATION
TOTAL 3RD YEAR ALLOCATION
$412,200
15,000
350,000
500,000 !;L
50,000
4,500-,
130,000
250, 000
3, 000
50,000
50,000
1,500
40,000
30,000
14,800
160,000
$2,061,000
12-7-76