Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1978-10-10 Bd Comm minutes141CROF1LMEO BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA . MINUTES RESOURCES CONSERVATION COMMISSION AUGUST 22, 1978 4:30 P.M. IVIG CENTER CO NFE RENM ROOM MEMBERS PRESENT: Angerer, Bolnick, Denniger, Hotka, Stager. I STAFF PRESENT: Tinklenberg. SUMMARY OF DISCUSSION AND FORMAL ACTIONS TAKEN The chair called the meeting to order. Bolnick moved, Stager seconded, that the minutes of August 8, he approved as corrected. Approved unanimously. Letter to DOF.'' After one change, the letter was satisfactory. (attached) �j Civic Center HVAC on designated Stager moved, Hotka.seconded, that fie the ere B members Plastino b J s with s to review applicant consultant firms with etaf.f. and Tinklenberg. 'Approved unanimously. Heat Lose Identification Project Tinklenberg reported that the project will begin with exterior with columna ` scans and photographs. The scanners will use a sheet of the normal photo, for the address of the building, the number the date, the time, and the exterior the number of. the scan photo, ili eek the land nd wthe temperature when scans wereowners identifiedc'nand photos be developed, the building begin being mailed to the owners. be devanytnq ' information will the requests For full -building During the third week of project, in. During the fourth week the scans will possibly,begin ening appointments to conduct the Full-building staff will begin setting fifth week, the first full -building scans. During the From that point n these activities will continue ed. e h e conduct end 1n th n when the, will us 7 until q, nen d simulta Y foil an same order as they began. The project start up each. an. by the weather conditions. ending each spring will he dictated By amortising the cost of the instrument over five years, adding totaL,hy the num her of the other 'project 'costs , and dividing that of. $8,99 per hour was derived. working, hours in six months, a figure the elimination of the non= By going through a similar process with a figure of instrument project costs and the camera attachment $2.09,per.hour was derived. va i YY n . Micorl r+to BY i ',. JORM MICR+LAB j CEDAR RAPID% • nr.S MOINES , hi1CROF1LMED'BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND UES 1101LILS, 10WA Resources Conservation Commission August 22, '1978 Page 2 Rolnick moved, Stager seconded, that the Resources Conservation Commission recommend that the City: charge -a fee of $10.00. per house,outside of the 403 Program Area, and $2.10 per hour with a minimum of one hour for Fire Department use. Approved unanimously: Energy Conservation Program Report Tinklenherg reported thnt the Program activities accomplished to date is that information concerning the Pilot Solar Demonstration - Project has been published.The collection of energy use data of. the municipal buildings has begun, and the thermography instrument has been purchased and will be delivered by Augustust 30,`'1978. The Commissioners felt much more publicity is needed concerning the program. Tinklenherg was requested to investigate the various publicity alternatives and to report back to the RCC at the next meeting. other Business I In reviewing ,the letter to DOE. the RC(, noted the City's ratio of C s I compact autos to Intermediate and standard autos. Tinklenherg commented that the City has begun to purchase subcompacts and that, the process of fleet, replacement takes some time. I I The RCC felt that:informa[Lon should he distributed to the City # staff to make people aware of the energy management teams. Tinklenherg reported ,that he had received Information concerning J the DOE Electric and Hybrid Vehicle Program and that he had re- quested that the City be placed on the program opportunity notice mailing list. He also informed :the Commissioners' concerning the i HACAP'program application which has been made to the General Ser - ion Education vices Administration to fund an Energy Conserva[' I, Project. HACAP will utilize CF,TA employees to provide low income families with information concerning energy conservation methods: The meeting wasadjourned at 6:08 P.M. i Respectfully submitted, Roger Tinklenherg. John Houck, Secretary I yCD BY ;I 81CROilLM ,I ,. JORM MICR4LA,B "C[DAR RANDS • ;IES MOINES mICROFILMED BY DORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IUWA 4 �J CITY OIOWA CITY CIVIC CFNfFR 410 E. W/1 �I IINGION Sl IOWA CI I Y 1(JWn 5224 ) • (319) .3r -A J8(T) i August 23, 1978 t ii Department of Rnergy i Public Hearing Management Room 2313 I Box UP, 2000 M Street, N.W.. Washington, D.C. ':20461 IDear Sir or Madame: Upon review of the proposed Contingency Gasoline Rationing Plan, the Iowa City, Y. Iowa ,Resources Conservation rvation Commission has a number of I concerns. The Commission'scomments range from the overall concept of the plan to how the plan would affect the City of Iowa City, if ample mented as proposed, and are intended to aid In making the plan more. j equitable. First of all, the Resources Conservation Commission is concerned that the need for the Contingency Gasoline Rationing Plan may arise due to a failure of the nation's energy conservation effort and that rationing, would have to be -I implemented to prevent major disruptions due to a I gasoline shortage. In such an eventualitY, once ra tlo nin B i s over people will have a tendency to return to their old consumptive fiabite. Therefore,'to achieve a long lasting benefits, the Contingency Gasoline Rationing Plan:should include emergency funding to aid localgovernments in the acquisition of mass transit, equipment and is the establishment of mass transit systems. Emergency measures restricting, Parking on public and commercial o pr perty,are recommended as an additional incentive for' People to use mase transit. � The following eight items are problems with the plan itself. 1, The ration allocations will be made for every registered motor vehicle, on the assumption that "possession of a vehicle is the beat readily' available indicator of gasoline need." This assumption favors the owner offseveral vehicles over against' the single vehicle owner. Thal, reason this is note equitable ie because 9 use .the I three vehicle owner is highly unlikely to drive three times as many miles per year as the single vehicle owner is. Therefore, the registration of more than one vehicle does not indicate need. Yet the three vehicle owner will get three times as many gasoline ration coupons as the single vehicle owner will. f 1 MICROFILMED BY, - n' JORM MICR+LAH. I CEDAR RAMOS •'OCS .MOINES IAICROFILMED BY JORM 141CROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS, AND DES 140114LS, 10WA -2- The Commission's recommendation is that ration allocations he made for no more than two vehicles per family. Also no allocations should be made to vehicles registered by a person under lg years of age, unless they prove, on an application form, that they need the vehicle to commute to work. 2. The white market is a good idea in some ways. It allows flexibility and provides an additional incentive to save gasoline because people can sell excesscoupons or are faced with having to purchase additional coupons if they don't conserve:'. On the other hand, it could make the tracking of coupons almost ,impossible, 'in the event that counterfeit coupons are entering the market. 3. That raises the entire question of security.. Not only will the white market possibly make it easier for counterfeit coupons to he _passed, but also the plan has no remedy for the destruction, lose, or theft of ration coupons. Is;the person who suffers such a lose going to have to purchase additional coupons on the white market? That is hardly just or equitable. On the, other hand, how could it "' • be proven that a person's coupons, have actually been lost or stolen, . or,that `'the coupons possessed by one person were stolen or lost by someone else? If there were no coupons available on:the white market at this time, this would createe a severe hardshipfor the person who lost his or her coupons. 4. The, plan states that a check recipient could present his/her i ration check directly to a gasoline supplier in exchange for 4. . � gasoline, coupons, or for a combination of'gasoline, ''coupons, 1' - or for a combination of gasoline and coupons: Yet elsewhere the plan states that: 1) all coupons exchanged for gasoline must he i redeemed`,, by indelibly marking them and that the redeemed coupons cannot be reused for the purchase of gasoline but must rather move up the supply chain (or a check in lieu of the coupons). Therefore, there appears to be no way that'a retailer can give out coupons as "change." If the retailer accepts the check for gasoline and, gives out change from hie/her white market transactions, the two trans- actions are no longer separate. And If the retailer pays cash for the number of coupons in excess of the gasoline transaction that, In actuality, is a white 'market sale since the coupons redeemed and turned in to the retailer's supplier must equal the amount of gasoline sold. The only waycoupon change could, he given out; is if the retailer has a sufficient supply of white market coupons to make change for the entire check and then the gasoline purchaser turns around and "pays" the appropriate number of coupons to the gasoline retailer in exchange for the number of gallons of gasoline purchased. Without an adequate supply of white market coupons on hand, retailers will not be able to cash customer's checks. 5. Participating ration banks will be able to charge a fee for ration rights accounts, but will there be any motivation for the ration banks to administer the accounts effectively?' Will there be any type of license or contract which will be able to be revoked as a penalty for negligence? MICROMMED BY JORM MICR46LAS CEDAR RAPIDS • ?ES MOINES 1�!CROFILMED BY JORM 14ICIZOLAB • CEDAR RAPIDS AND UES MUINLS, IU la -4- If the City was given the same allocation as the private sector, 540 gallons of., gasoline per automobile, pickup, and van (1.0) and 1,295 gallons per 25,000 pound truck (2.4) per year, it would be a 12.18% cut in the City's motor vehicle gasoline. This would not be equitable in that the rest of the country would he receiving a 22% C1 is given an allocation of 1 However, if the t :. cut in'gasol gasoline. y g ;. 540 gallons of, gasoline per year per vehicle, regardless of class, it would be a 36.38% cut in the City's gasoline. On the one hand, it is not really fair for DOE to give governmental units the same allocation as the private sector and 'yet, on the other hard, it is hardly equitable for the City of Iowa City's gasoline supply to be cut by 36.38% simply because the City uses. less gasoline than the private sectnrl The'Resources Conservation Commission's recommendation is that the same allotment index be used for governmental vehicles as for the private sector. It would he more precise to alter the, base allotment., For Iexample, while in the private sector an allotment index of 1.0 would mean an allocation of 540 gallons, in the governmental sector an allotment index of 1.0 could mean an allocation of 510 gallons. If.necessary the index would he adjusted, to fit the governmental' situation. 'Hilt under no circumstances should all governmental vehicles be given the uniformallotment index of 1.0. The ration allocation and the allocation index should he tailored to fit the governmental situation. ` 8. The; final questions are also concerning the allocation procedure. i What vehicles will be classified as emergency or priority vehicles? For example, will a sanitation supervisor's pickup, in which he/she supervises the workers, inspects thelroutea, and picks up missed' i refuse, he classified as a high priority vehicle? Or will animal control vehicles which in Iowa Cit 'is a police function be 1 classified as emergency,vehiclesT Also, 'are vehicles used for snow removal classified as emergency vehicles year around or seasonally only? The Resources Conservation Commission recognizes that there is a difficult trade—off between equitably meeting the diverse needs of millions of, gasoline users and limiting the administrative complexity and coot of the plan, therefore, it is the''intention of the Resources Conservation Commission to help make this plan as `'equitable and workable as possible. It is hoped that Americans will learn the conservation habit and that { gasoline rationing will not he needed; because it would create many t hardships. Yet, in spite of that hope, the nation cannot afford to he unprepared for such an eventuality. ,These comments have been submitted j based on that assumption. Please give them your full consideration. Thank you for your attention and time. I Sincerely, 3 ZESl;URCF.S CONSERVATION COMMISSION chairperson jml/10 MICRUILMED BY y" q, J0 RM MICR+LAE9 I, CEDAF PAPInS . 015 MOVIES r91CROFILi4ED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND UES MOINLS, IUwl1 Y `OI it MINUTES RESOURCES CONSERVATION COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 26, 19784:30 P.M. - CIVIC CENTER CONFERENCE ROOM i MEMBERS PRESENT: Bolnick,.Hotka, Houck, Stager. i STAFF PRESENT: Tinklenberg r i SUMMARY OF DISCUSSION AND FORMAL ACTION TAKEN Vice-Chair Hotka called the meeting to order. Stager moved, Bolnick seconded,'to approve the minutes of the August 22, 1978, meeting as corrected. Approved unanimously. ' I r HEAT LOSS IDENTIFICATION PROJECT In the course of the discussion concerning the Heat,loss Iden- tification Project, the Commissioners felt that a record should !, be kept of. the amount of use of the thermography instrument by ; the Fire Department, even though the Fire Department will not be charged for its use. They also felt that some type of check-out ' mechanism should be established sothat the instrument will not l and primary use of e ownership Y at the P d so th P rack' of an , be lost t , the instrument is not forgotten after several years. In discussing whether to charge investor-owned single -family or duplex residences within the 403 Program Area; the Commissioners agreed that, the thermography instrument is 'a ,diagnostic tool with the primary purpose of providing, information to building owners to enable them to save energy, therefore, in order to reach as many people as possible no fee should be charged for -the 4 investor-owned single -family and duplex residences. Houck moved, Stager seconded, to approve the Heat Loss Identi- fication Project fee structure proposed by the staff to revise the rate adopted by the RCC at the .August 22, 1978, meeting. S Approved unanimously. The revised fee schedule provides that the scans be done in the i 403 Program Area without a fee except for commercial and three or more unit residential structures, ,that all property owners outside', of the 403 Program Area pay'a fee for the service, except for the elderly who receive a blanket exemption and the low- income who file a-fee waiver form, and that outside', of the 403 s will be charged $7.00, Program Area singleIn family Y residences ce r unit i - multi.-unit residences $5.00 per , and commcrcialstructures $1.00 per 100 square feet of area scanned. Commercial and three Area or more unit residential structures within the 403 Program will be charged at the same rate as those outside of, the Area. Also, no fees will be charged for other City departmental use. 838 ; Y. •�ti wn" MILHOFILMID BY � JORM MICR+LOB CEDAR RAPIDS •' DES MOINES.. I.1ICROF1Li4ED BY-JORM1•IICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES 1-101NLS, IOWA I i z j PILOT SOLAR DEMONSTRATION PROJECT Tinklenberg raised the question of the general public liability insurance to be required of the contractor. It appears that it is very difficult for potential contractors to. get -general: public liability insurance for doing ,solar energy collector work.Insurance coverage which costs a general contractor $1,000 would cost ,the solar energy. contractor $9,000. For the City to not require the contractor to have public liability insurance seems to be an unacceptable risk. Yet if the City requires the contractor to have, public liability insurance, the choice of contractors, from the local area, will be limited to one. ,The City can require the contractor, the grantee, and the i 'seminar participants to sign astatement waiving all right 'to j hold the Cityresponsiblefor damages„ however, there is a , question of whether that waiver will be effective, in a lawsuit filed against the City. No conclusion wasreachedand staff will j, research the matter further. MEDIA OUTLETS REPORT is Tinklenberg reported that he sent letters to the local radio stations, television stations, and newspapers ` inquiring, concerning public service announcements,- .'talk, shows, and; advertising. He is still waiting responses from several. The meeting was adjourned at 6:00 P.M. j I r Respectfully submitted, Boger Tinklenberg. John Houck, Secretary. , I j i 141CROEILMEO BY a' I.,. JORM MICR+LAB. �. CEDAR P,APIDS - )ES MOIRES h11CROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND UES MUINLS, 100 �r i 1 MINUTES MAYOR'S YOUTH EMPLOYMENT SEPTEMBER 5, 1978 CHAMBER OF COMMERCE - MEMBERS PRESENT: Barber, Johansen, Karegan, and Nelson. . MEMBERS ABSENT: Curtis, Darnell, Holzhammer, Keefer, Kelly, and Schreiber. SUMMARY OF DISCUSSION AND FORMAL ACTIONS. TAKEN The vacancy on the board was discussed and a update was given on potential applicants. Three applications were received by the City Clerks office for the' board vacancy. An audit will be conducted on the, 1977-1978 Mayor's Youth Program. h The audit regulations sent by the State were reviewed. The Board approved Chairperson, Dave Johansorh request to contact Greenwood - I�and'Crim, P.C. about audit services and'.fees..Dave Johansen, also was going to contact Joann Callison, AssistantState Youth Coordina- tor to request an extension in the due date of the audit.- The final report for the period September l',1977 -May 31, 1978, wee distributed and reviewed by board):members. A copy of this report attached. ' An update on the current school year program was given by the dir ector.;The report included number',of applicants, jobsites,;and orien- tation'for new, participants. t The Board scheduled their next meeting for Tuesday, October 17th, at 4:00 P.M. i t 1 )839 y I4I CROC I LVED BY+; ' JORM MICR+LAB + I + CEDAR RAPIDS DCS MDI!:CS �� t4ICROFILMED BY JORM 141CROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND UES 1401NES, IOWA Y �- STATE Or IOWA. i GUVERNOR'S YOUTH :+PI'URTUNITY PROGRAM Floal Repurt Youth Employment Projects School YPAr 197`1-1978 I. DATA (Please double check all Figures - if the figures do not add, the report i will be returned for corrections) A. Community and/or Counties: Johnson County j B. Project Period: 9/1/77 -',5/31/78 C. Job Slots i i 1. Total number of job slots developed: 75 2. Total number of job sluts filled: 3 + f D. Participants I. Number of youth employed at outset of project 28 2. Number of youth employed at end of project 37 3• 'Total number of youth employed (not necessarily the same as "total number of job slots filled"): SS , A. -Male B. Female Age, 14 s 12 Age 15 0— Age 16 1 Age 17 -2-- Age 8 1 1 Other n— 0 I TOTAL 34 4 4. Total number of minority students employed: i A. Male B. Female p 5• Educational level of youth employed: A. Male D. Female i 7th Grade O 2 ! 8th Grade _y_ R 9th Grade h- tt 10th Grade It n 11th Grade 2 12th Grade 2 ; TOTAL 21 14 lcnorlLMED By DORM. MICR+LAB I ` , CEDAR. RAPIDS • DGS MOINES ;.. 111CROF1LMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, I0WA e G. Dropuuts a. Total number of youth who began employn.`n[ a5 0 r, school drupOULs: b. Number of Youth who began program as drop- 0 outs and returned to school: c. Total number of: youth who dropped out of 1 ; school while parLiclpating in the project: i 7• Total number of youth who participated in pre -career educational S ' programs before employment: A. Male- B. Female 0 i 0 0 B. Total number of youth who participated in pre career educational programs during employment: I A. Male B. Female _1— 0 9• Total number of youth who, at time of employment, came from (ADL, Social Security, families receivingpublic assistance unemployment insurance, etc.): tR A. Male B. Female a. Number of present }; ' to ADC recipients _ b. Number of youth from low income families 7 75 i c. Number of delinquent or pre-delinquent,OI youth' d. Number of mentally retarded 2 1 c. Number of dis- 6 advantaged youth 4 2 34 55 ' r , 10. ro 18 df m ram: c D Number of youth term inat P A. Male' B. Female g 10 Reasons for turminatlon, Chose to quit 8 Picked up by emDlover' c. for pare -time osltion-l- Poor work habits staff chose to terminate -4- l Found own job -3- School conflicts -l- Moved from the area -1 I iiia d. 'Type of follow-up used for terminated youth An interview was V nzollc es t e rminatln B to discuss future Plans,The I conducted on all e , Enrollee often visited atafE conducted follov-up contacts by phone. the Mayor's Youth Em to menu ro rnm`offi e. — x y D Y F T• `�� MICRDFILMED BY S , JORM MICR6LAB` ` CEDAR P.APIDS •DES MDIMGs f�LICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB : CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA Y ( 1, ,er of youl.11 who p.&LICIpJIvd ll: fOP WIIU (II'Ilduate I from high school 5 I b. Number of youth who graduated and will be continuing' their education beyond high schuul • '2 E. Average number of hours each youth was employed per week: in -school 10.5 - 11 i ksummer � I F. Job Supervision I: Total number of supervisors paid from project budget: 0 f 2 TotaI number of- work site supervisors not paid from project budget: 45: 3. 'Average number of youth assigned to each super- ,i visor: G. Finances I. Approved project expenditures: Total a. .Youth Salaries __ -" b. Youth; Personnel Benefits c. Supervisory Personnel Services d Supervisory Personnel Benefits e. Travel f. Office Supplies Other: (list: > { h: -.TOTAL. 36,892.63 I 2. Local Share: 12,912.42 State Share: _23,980.21_. II. NARRATIVE Please answer the folIowirig quest)Otis On suparato page's and attach t0 the rCIorf : t ( Id]CRDEILMED BY - a JORM MICR#L AO sir' 1 . CEDAR, RAPIDS - DES MOINES MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR ,RAPIDS AND DES 1101NES, IOWA` A. List program objectives, standards used to measure objectives and to what extent program objective:. were met. If objectives were not met, .why and what program changes will be made in the future to meet these objectives? B. List all strengths and weaknesses of your program. What can be done to strengthen your program in the future? C. List each work station used,`a job description for each position and number of youth employed by each work 'station in each position. Job Classification Work Station Number of Youth Maintenance Person 1) East Junior High 2) City of Maple Creek i i 3) Local Church i , (I D. Planning and Review Committees -Please attach a schedule of 9 t meetings 9 held during the school year and a list of the members. What role did the Committee play In the project? How, do you plan to utilize the 1 Committee in the future? 11 E. What new or innovative activities have been tried with the project { t this year in the following areas: I. Recruitmentollcles and procedures P I 2. Work experience 3• Cultural and educational activities 4. Follow-up procedures for terminated youth i Will these activities be,intergrated into the program in the future? I I F. Who should be contracted if additional Information regarding the project is required? (name, address, and telephone number) G. Please attach any questionnaires and their results administered to youth enrollees and/or work supervisors. - H. Describe the recommendations you would suggest for State guidelines overnin the GYOP and/or the State Committee's role in the Governor's 99 Youth Opportunity Program, I 1. Attach any case histories of GYOP youth that you feel would be of interest. I 141CRO(ILMED BY - - JORM MICR41LAB CEDAR RAPIDS ! PCs '10HES I IAICROFILIIED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA i II. Narrative .i >i A. Program Objectives I :1 STANDARD POR - TO WHAT EXTENT WAS !; j OBJECTIVES MEASUREMENT OBJECTIVE NET 1. To develop 35 jobs at sites Copyof'jobsite survey - '75 .job slots were. developed! that will provide good super- completed and on file 63 job slots were actually vision,' meaningful work ex- by 10/1/77. utilized. perience, and comply with, the program's regulations: 2. To place 35 youth in Johnson Interview and Placement SS youth were employed 1n County. Process completed by Johnson County. Youth were 10/1/77. matched to jobs according to their interests and abiliJ�. ties. 3. To conduct follow-up on all Job site visits recorded... Enrollees were visited every enrollees diacuaeing eclool Enrollee evaluations com- 2'wee". Staff wrote follw-up performance,work performance, plated 10/1, 12/1, 2/1, reports. and personal problems or successes. and 4/1. 4 enrollee performance evalua- i tions were completed by the worksite supervisors. ,5 4. To provide special servicessuch Written report of activities The staff gave presentations at z as employment counceling,' vocationa\on file. several schools 1n the area. „ • and career counSeling.l Topics included: ;I a. Employment opportunities for youth/child labor laws b. Good work habits c. How to complete Job Applies!: <) tions d. How to act on a Job Interview. 5. To provide career exploration Approximately 15 enrollees will 2 enrollees used the C.I.S.I. 111 by using'CISI and S.D.S. participate More enrollees willl,be encouraged to use the C.I.S.I.'next year. A computer has been installedat the CP.0 allternative high school and this will be more accessible for the enrollees. A schedule of available times will be provided to the enrollees. v i I1ICROFILMED BY J M MICR #LAB ..CEDAR RAPIDS •. DES MKS: �' r MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA y STANDARD FOR i TO WRAT EXTENT WAS OBJECTIVES ..MEASUREMENT OBJECTIVE MET 5. Cont. Workshops sponcered by Kirkwood Community College will be made. i available to enroilee$. i 6. To explore youth to; 2 social gatherings were arranged I'• alternative cultural and for staff and enrollees. It was an,opportunity for the enrollees educational activities. to meet one another.More leisure time activitlls will be planned in the upcoming year. i. 15'enrollees were referred aad 7. To refer youth to appro- registered with.Job Service of, priate agencies and'programe Iowa[ when desired. I referral was made to United 1 Action for Coun6eling. 2'referrala were made to the Career Development Program. 4 w re made to.Summer 20 referrals, e Cats. i � 8. To',develop'more jobs in the ,Copy of Referral on file ,with i from at n 4 enrollees termin g > vete'eect for youth who riow Y Job Service. Employment status the program were placed in.non- terminate from the program of enrollee' outlined on terms- subsidized emploment-in public I or'who `are not eligible. nation form. agencies. j ineligible enrollee was placed in a public agency. � I v t}' i 141CROFILMED BY x� i DORM MICR+LAB_� �... CFDAR RAPIDS DES MOINES: i IjICROf1LMED BY JORM 14ICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MUINES, IQWA B. Strengths 1. Meaningful jobsltes have been developed that provide diverse work opportunities and training for enrollees. 2. The supervisors view the program as effective and val- uable for the enrollees'development.', 3. Supervisors' involvement, in the interview and place- ment process has helped the staff match enrollees more " adequately. 4. A handbook has been developed which explains', the major components of the program: 5. Supportive relationships' have developed between the I staff and supervisors as a result of bi-Weekly follow- up contacts and assistance with problem -solving. 6. A realistic work orientation is provided for youth en- I rolled and terminated, from the program. 7. Emphasis on the development of good work habits and attitudes. B. Placement of youth in non -subsidized' employment. 9. Trust and friendship is developed between staff and enrollees. C. Weaknesses and Changes Sought: 1. The continual development of meaningful work experi- ence. 2. The need to develop non -subsidized jobs in the private" sector to allow new enrollees in the program. 3. Re4VCfiOAof the time frame an enrollee is placed on the waiting list. Enrollees who have been on the program for several years will not be a high priority for re- cruitment. A set of criteria will be developed and used to screen enrollees into the program. 4. Development of educational and career related nctiv- ities in conjunction with the Iowa City Schools. ; I 5. Closer communication with enrollees' parents and re - 1 � ferral Sources to promote coordination of services. 6. The need exists to familiarize youth with the steps to job acquisition. (.Application procedure and inter- viewing skills.) 141CROFILMED BY .I JORM MICRALAB I CEDAR RAPIDS • DCS MOINES MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA V ! Job Classification Work Station Number of Youth Animal Caretaker Animal Shelter, 2 Clerical U.A.Y. . 3 CEEC C - Mark IV 1 Personnel/City 3 j Finance Dept. 1 Building Dept, 1 Navy Recruiting Office I Veterans Hospital 3 ,Mayor's Youth Employment 1 { CityManager', 1 Clerk/City I Career Development Program Ca b P 1 Computer Clerk Lindquist Computer Center 1 Day Care Aide Early Childhood Education Center 2 Coral Nursery 1 M Headstart 3 Nelson Center 1 Dental Assistant' University Dental Building 1 Food Service University Hospital Dietary 1 Veterans Hospital Canteen 1 I I tWestside Greenhouse Worker Greenhouse 1 Library 'Aide Coralville Library 1 Iowa City,Library 4 Solon High School 1 Maintanence National Guard 1 Service Buidling 1 Council on Aging 2 Mark Twain 1' Veterans Hosptial 2 Oxford Elementary School 1 Grantwood 1 Lake MacBride 1' Southeast Junior High 1 i Northwest Junior High 1 2' Longfellow Mark IV 1- : Coralville. Elementary School l! j Patient Escort Mercy Hospital 5 Police, Cadet Iowa City Police Dept. 2 i Recreation Aide Willow Creek Center 1 { Stage/Lighting Assistant University Theatre 1 j I, I MICROFILMED BY JORM MIC R#LAB CEDAR RAPIDS • DES MOINES 14ICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES 14UINE'), IOWA D. The Planning and Review Committee met once a month this year. The committee consisted of the following members: i 1. Mr. Bernard Barber (Secretary/Treasurer),Job Service of Iowa. 2. Mr. Roger Darnell, Youth Diversion Program. 3.I Father Robert Holzhammer, Trinity Episcopal Church. 4.' Mr. David Johansen„ (Chairperson): , 5. Mr. Keith Kaefer, Chamber of Commerce.' j 6. Mr. Nick Karegan, Iowa City School Board. 7. Mr. Joe Curtis, Dept of Social Services. 8. Ms. Judy Kelly, Iowa City Public Library. 9. Ms. Linda Schreiber, Administrative Ass't for City of Iowa City. 10. Ms. Connie Nelson. j The 1 committee is a recognized Board of the City of Iowa City. The Board was set no to analyze and meet the needs -of Johnson County with regard to youth employment. The board j will be responsible for the evaluation of the program and the .,� personnel, assist in the area of fund raisinyand legislation, and appoint the director of the program. Development of non -subsidized jobs in the private sector is of major concern to the Board. The board is continually 1 open to new ideas pertaining to programs that canlassist youth d I in obtaining job training. E. New or Innovative Ideas 1. Recruitment policies and procedures: A handbook has f been developed which outlines the program's components. Supervisor/enrollee responsibilities, and eligibility criteria. 2. Work' Experience: Supervisor involvement in:placement i and interview process. Supervisor emphasis on the em- ployer's responsibilities. 3. Cultural and Educational Activities: Enrollee partic- ipation'in courses/workshops that are offered for their jobsites. Enrollees visiting one another's job sites. 4. Follow up procedure for terminated youth: Youth are Is ;i 141CRUILMED BY r. JORM MICR6LA13 .. CEDAR RAPIM DCS MOINES • 1.1ICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLABCEDAR RAPIDS AND DES 110INLS, IOWA Supervf!.or's Evaluation^' ' York Supervisor. of M.Y.F..P. Job Site 1. Do you feel the M.Y.F.P. program is effective find valuable for the enrollee's development) 1. flow well was the enrollee matched to the position in which he/she 1 was placed) i 3. How well did; the M.Y.E.P, staff help you understand what you could expect from the enrollee and the staff? 4. Were you made aware of your responsibilities prior to actual placement? it t 1 ,O ,! 5, Now adequate was the staff's support through'a) follow up contacts it .• ,..�.I b). assistance insolving problems c) follow through? tit 7 I' 6. Overalls were you satisfied with the program and would you accept another placenent'from M.Y.E.P.? 1 it I 7. What changes would you suggest to improve the program? I: 8. Additional Comments: } r 6 s A. ,J i Signed t I "O„R11L7 Date I i '�Y•. tdICROFROFiLIdEO BY •1' ' ORM MICR#LAB J d i CEDAR RAPIDS • DGS MOINES CEDARHApInS DCS MOINES MICROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES 1401NES, 10'n!A ti MAYOR'S YOUTH EMPLOYMENT PROGRAM i SEPTEMBER REPORT' I 'I I Number of applicants received: 45 Number of ineligible youth: 2 Number ofuninterestedyouth: 4 Number of'unplaced youth: 10 Number of youth placed: 29 As of September 26, 1978, 29 youth were placed in employment ' e in the Johnson County area. type yp of jobs developed are listed below: �I Job Classification Worksite Number of You Clerical School:of Social Work 1 1 Mayors Youth Program 1 I.C. Finance Dept.' 1' United',Action for Youth United',Way of Johnson County 1' Mark IV Comm. Center 2 Mercy, Hospital 2.' Custodial' Regina High School 1' Iowa National. Guard West High School', 1' i Northwest Jr. High 4 ! Kirkwood Elementary 1 I!1 Coralville Central , i Library Aide Solon High School 3 1 ' �• ` Public Library I .C. Y Coralville Public Library 1 Teacher's Aide He Start:Preschool 1i 2 Friends of the Childrens Museum o Center ' Early Childhood Educati n 1: � Maintenance Worker I.C. Equipment Division 1 1 Coralville Police Dept. Animal Caretaker I.C. Animal Shelter i t. Botany Dept. it B Greenhouse Worker ' Univers y Y P 1 I I i ' Patient Escort Mercy Hospital 1 � Total Youth Placed 29 I I t r ±'. I4ICROFIL14E0 BY JORM :MICR4LAB ITDAR. RAP10S • PCS MOINES �•` 1•i1CROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, 10'WA III A. mala I. To place 6 additional youth in Johnson County. 2. To conduct follow-up on all enrollees,placed .discussing work performance, school'. performance,', and personal successes or problems. 3. To report on program activites and overall pro- i Jett operations 4. To offer educational and cultural activitea for the youth. B. Method and/or Procedures 1. Screen and intervieweligible applicants. Jobs will be developed based upon the; applicants' inter- eats and skills. 2. The Director and Assistant Director will visit job- sites and arrange conferences. 3., Attend: State G.Y.O.P. workshop in Des Moines. Attend M.Y.E.P. Board meeting. 4. The staff and enrollees will work jointly on developing a list, of activities and resources. I I i , � I i Ii ,i � I I I I' I i I 141CROFILMED BY ,j JORM.. B .. CEDAR RAPIDS .. DES MOVIES 1,11CROFILMED BY JORM MICROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND ULS 1-101NES,'10'dA J\ n o- Minutes Design Review Committee September 27, 1978 Plaza Centre One Committee Members present: Haupert, Wegman, Gutheinz,' Sinek, Lilly, Summerwill Seiberling, Lafore, Wockenfuss' I Committee Members absent: Alexander City Staff: Glaves, Keating, Conklin Others present: Chuck Engberg Chuck Engberg (Hansen, Lind, Meyer) presented plans for the Old Capitol Centre. The primary entrance will be on Clinton Street, directly opposite College Street, and; on Washington Street, west of Clinton. This latter entrance will also serve as a bus transfer area. Substantial footage has been allowed and the building is moved back so the sidewalk, can be widened for this purpose. Drop off areas for passengers will be located along Clinton Street. Pennys and r I Younkers will have their own unloading areas. 'Ilio other stores will be serviced by one mein dock. ,The, parking ramp will be open 24 hours aday,' however,, the Mall will not. Between the Mall' and the parking ramp there is a fire exit corridor (which is a code requirement) that leads out to Capitol Street. 'there is another exit corridor which most, people will use leading, to Clinton Street and it visually open to the parking facility. The form of the building is des' emphasize the fact that'the re is a flowing'to ether of all the i nod to h stz 8 mP g various circulation routes and a central court, which is to be 30 feet high., A'horizontal line was created to tie in the entrances to the building mass. Everything; below this line will be highly detailed, everything above this line is simplified. There will be display windows, but they will not directly relate to the stores that are behind them. These windows can be rented by the merchants, so a merchant' inside the building with no outside window can adver- tise'their products with these windows. The signs on the outside of the build- ing may not indicate which stores are located in the Mall, but what items may be purchased within the Mall. The signs will all be the same height around the building.' Summerwill thought these signs were an excellent idea. Materi- als for the Mall will relate to University buildings and to the downtown area. A combination of precast, concrete and brick will be used.: 'there will be built in areas for people to rest with plantings around the areas. A question was raised as to how many tenants the Mall would house. Iingberg replied that there could be approximately 50 tenants and local business would have first chance at the locations. Engberg said hopefully construction would begin this fall. The signage package will have to go to the Planning, and Zoning Commission and then to City Council under the large scale development provisions of the sign ordinance. The signage package would at that time be brought to the'Design Review Committee for advise to the Council. It was moved and seconded that { the preliminary design plans be approved. The motion was unanimously approved. Chairperson Lilly moved to adopt the July 26 and August 23 minutes. Sieberling seconded, motion carried unanimouly. Lilly wanted to 'discuss why the Design Review Committee did not see plans for the front remodelling of O'Briens, which is a delicatessen,, located on Iowa Ave. ` The,Deadwood plans were also not reviewed by the Committee''. Glavcs replied MICRORILMEa By `I � JORM . MICR6LAB CEahR RAP105 r)FS MOINES MICROFILMED BY JURM 141CROLAB CEDAR RAPIDS AND DES MOINES, IOWA 4 j° Minutes' 1 September 27, 1976 Page 2 that the plans had not been reviewed because he had not been notified of the permit applications. i I The Design Review Committee feels that Osco's should do some redecorating on their store front. Jackson's is another store the Committee, feels should do some exterior work. Glaves said City Council discussed the topic of store fronts and how to dealwith the ,merchants. Glaves at this time has not discussed the problem in detail with with Council. 'Glaves reported the Council feels the Design Review. Committee should deal with the downtown as a whole h e and not single out any one merchant. t Glaves presented photographs and a drawing of a site plan for the hotel down- town. The basic intent of the architect is to use contemporary materials and c0mo up with a basic pattern which is reminiscent of his youth in ''Iowa City. Jim Nagle is the architect and he is originally from IowaCity. The exterior is planned as p red brick. Gloves said he would make plans for Nagle to visit Iowa City, and present the plans himself as Glaves said, he himself could not give justicetothe plans. A special meeting will be scheduled before the next Design Review meeting. ,a. The Design Review Committee moved to recommend that the City Council allocate suitable funds, for seating, sidewalks and vegetation for the he streetsca e P ,^. i Phase Ii Project: This motion was unanimously approved. i •Iberc being no further business the meeting was adjourned. Jule Conklin n ,1, j, r � I I � a 1 i Y 141CROF {1.. 1MIGRYLAB joRm CEDAR 'RAPIDS • OES MOINES