HomeMy WebLinkAbout1979-03-27 Bd Comm minuteshIINUTES
IOWA CITY PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
RARCH 15, 1979 -- 7:30 P.M.
CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS
MEMBERS PRESENT: Blum, Jakobsen, Kammermeyer, Lehman, Ogesen
MEMBERS ABSENT: Cain, Vetter
STAFF PRESENT: Boothroy, Ryan, Wilkinson
RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE CITY COUNCIL:
1. 5-7841. That the preliminary and final LSRD plan of Ralston Creek Village be
approved subject to the following contingencies: (1) the signatures of the
utility companies be provided on the plan;( 2 t
he legal including a metes and bound description andthecertificationroftaoregisteredeted
land surveyor; and (3) the sidewalk must continue through the drive on Van Buren
Street back to the existing sidewalk.
Z. approved
S-7905. That the preliminary and final LSNRD plan of Owens Brush Company be
be corrected dsotthat tit coincidhe following e withlthenbounda y cies: (1d the legal description should
way width for Lower Muscatine Road should be indicated; and
t(3)'the future
2
expansion plans should be deleted from this plan. ( ) the right -of-
()
RE UESTS TO THE CITY MANAGER FOR INFORMATION OR STAFF ASSISTANCE:
None
SU"BY OF DISCUSSION AND ACTION TAKEN:
Blum called the meeting to order and asked if anyone present wished to discuss any
item not included on the agenda. No one responded.
Blum then called for consideration of the minutes of the meeting of February 26,
1979. There being no discussion of the minutes, they were unanimously approved as
circulated.
S-7841. Public discussion of the preliminary and final LSRD plan of Ralston Creek
Village, located between Gilbert and Van Buren Streets, just north of Abrams Furniture
Store; 45 -day limitation period: waived.
Boothroy presented an overlay and explained that the Board of Adjustment had met
earlier and had granted the special use permit for parking that had been requested
by the Abrams. lie explained that many of the deficiencies and discrepancies have been
taken care of and that an additional island with a tree has been included in the plan,
thus eliminating the need for an innovative parking plan. The deficiencies remaining
are: (1) the signatures of the utility companies still are not provided on the plan;
Of a (Z) the legal description including a metes and bounds description and the certification
continue Ethrough lthe drive and suryyon Vanor dBurens to bStreetltoetheaexistinghsidewalklk does not
605
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES
I
r",
I'Innning and Zoning Commission
March 16, 1979
Page 2
There being no discussion on these plans, Blum called for a vote for approval of the
preliminary and final LSRD plan of Ralston Creek Village subject to the following
contingencies: (1) the signatues of the utility companies be provided on the plan;
(2) the legal description be completed including a metes and bounds description and
the certification of a registered land surveyor; and (3) the sidewalk must conti�iue
I through the drive on Van Buren Street b
unanimous (5-0). ack to the existing sidewalk. Approval was
S-7905. Public discussion of the preliminary and final LSNRD plan of Owens Brush
Company, located at Lower Muscatine Road and Mall Drive; 4S -day limitation period:
4/18/79.
Boothroy presented an overlay of the area and explained that a revised preliminary and
final LSNRD plan had been submitted. Deficiencies remaining included: (1) the legal
description needs to be completed so that it coincides with the boundary description;
hwidth oLower
plan. Boothroyalso statedthathewould Fprefer nthe ofuture ad uexpansionld belcated plans bon the
e taken
off this plan.
Blum called for approval of the preliminary and final LSNRD plan of Owens Brush
subject to the following contingencies: (1) the legal description should be corrected
so that it coincides with the boundary description; 2
) theLower Muscatine Road should be indicated; and(3)the futurerexpansion planstshofor
uld
be deleted from this plan. Approval was unanimous (s-0).
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned.
Prepared b'
aandra S. Wilkinson, PPD Secretary
I
1 Approved by�
j Ernest W. Lehman, Pf,Z Secretary
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES
MINUTES
IOWA CITY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
MARCH 15, 1979 -- 4:30 P.M.
CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS
MEMBERS PRESENT: Baldus, Harris, Hughes, Conlin (4:40 p.m.)
MEMBERS ABSENT: None
STAFF PRESENT: Ryan, Wilkinson, Boothroy, Schmeiser, Farmer
i
FORMAL ACTIONS TAKEN:
1. V-7903. That the request for a special use permit for parking be granted subject
To the following conditions: (1) notice of the possible flooding dangers be
described in detail in the leases, (2) signs describing the potential hazard be
posted in the parking lot, and (3) a warning system to alert residents of the
al buildings be installed and operated.
SUMMARY OF DISCUSSION:
Harris called the meeting to order. Harris moved, and Baldus seconded, that Hughes
serve as Chairperson of the Board for the next period of rotation. The vote on this
motion was unanimous (4-0).
Hughes called for approval of the minutes of the meeting of February 15, 1979.
Harris moved that the minutes be amended as follows: (1) Under Formal Actions Taken,
add the following sentence at the end of the paragraph applying to case V-7902:
"Both variances are conditioned upon compliance in actual development with the layout
and details as shown on the site plan submitted as a part of the application; this
plan being titled: Planned Area Development and Large Scale Non -Residential Develop-
ment Plan, ACT Testing Processing Facility, Iowa City, Iowa, prepared by Shive-Hattery
and Associates, dwg, no. 178536-1, dated January 2, 1979; and (2) Page 2, paragraph 4
under case V-7902, add at the end of the last sentence ", i.e., installation of a green
strip, curbs and curb cuts within the right-of-way of the street, if dedicated to the
City." Baldus seconded the motion for these amendments and the motion carried
unanimously.
4
Hughes called for a vote to approve the amended minutes. Baldus moved, and Harris
seconded, that the minutes of February 15, 1979, be approved as amended. Motion
carried unanimously.
V-7903. Public hearing on an application submitted by Sam and Gary Abrams for a
"Special Use Permit", according to Section 8.11.02.13 of the Zoning Ordinance, to
permit parking to be located less than ten meters from the Ralston Creek bank.
Boothroy presented an overlay of the proposed site and explained that parking is one
of the uses permitted by right within the floodway except when located closer than
ten meters (32.8 feet) from the creek bank. He further explained the Flood Management
Regulations as stated in the Staff Report.
Frank Farmer, Civil Engineer for the City of Iowa City, presented some slides of
r
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES tI0IRES
Board of Adjustment
March 15, 1979
Page 2
the immediate area during the 1972 flood, which was described as being a 17 -year
flood. He explained that Burlington Street was completely closed and that portions
of Gilbert Street were impassable. Access to the property in question was impossible
during this time.
IBill Meardon, attorney for the applicants, presented a memorandum, which is attached,
from Mr. S.W. Wiitala, Hydrologist for Shive-Hattery and Associates. This memorandum
presented considerations for the justification of the special use permit.
1
John Wi llers of Shive-Hattery and Associates explained that a warning system is
a possibility for use in warning residents of the buildings of impending flooding.
He explained that the system is similar to the system used by police and fire officials.;
He also explained the possibility of posting warning signs in the parking lot. He
further explained that major changes would be necessary if the special use permit is
denied. These changes would make the project economically unfeasible.
Following a very lengthy discussion that included the use of right and liability for
damages caused by automobiles floated away in a flood, Harris moved, and Baldus
seconded, that the special use permit be granted subject to the following conditions:
(1) notice of the possible flooding dangers be described in detail in the leases,
(2) signs describing the potential hazard be posted in the parking lot, and (3) a
warning system to alert residents of the buildings be installed and operated. The
vote for approval of the motion was unanimous (4-0).
V-7904. Public hearing on an application submitted by James W. Powers for a variance
In the Tree Regulations, Section 8.10.40.11(B)(1) of the Zoning Ordinance, to allow
parking spaces to intersect with a drive.
Boothroy presented an overlay of the area and explained that the plan meets the
iTree Regulations with the exception of an island between parking spaces and the drive
Following a brief discussion by Board members, Baldus moved, and Conlin seconded,
that further discussion and action on this item be deferred until the next meeting.
The vote was 4-0 in favor.
A discussion followed regarding the date for the next meeting. It was decided that
the next meeting will be scheduled for Wednesday, April 4, 1979. At this time, the
Board will continue its consideration of the Kerber application (deferred from the
February meeting) and the Powers application (deferred at this meeting).
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned.
Prepared
Approved '
Official Filing Date: MAR 19 1979
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES
■
B
r"+
HERO
TO: Board of Adjustment
City of Iowa City, Iowa
FROM: S. W. Wiltala, Hydrologist
Shive-Hattery L Associates, Iowa City
RE: Appeal dated January 17, 1979, to permit parking to be located less than
ten meters from the stream bank for the proposed Ralston Creek Village
(Section 0.11.02.12D.3 of the Flood Plain Management Ordinance)
DATE: March 12, 1979
Hydrologic considerations for the justification of the subject special -use permit
are:
I. The distance from the Gilbert Street bridge to the drainage divide is
approximately 35,000 feet, and the difference in elevation is about
180 feet. Using these data in an empirical relationship indicates
that the time of concentration for the Gilbert Street site is about
3 hours. This is the time required for water to travel from the most
distant part of the watershed to Gilbert Street. With a time of con-
centration of about 3 hours, empirical relations indicate that for a
severe storm the time from the beginning of excess rainfall to the
flood peak would be about 2-1/2 hours.
Recc Js of the U. S. Geological Survey show the following for the
flood of July 17, 1972:
Ralston Creek at Rochester Avenue
Approximate time of beginning of rise - 2:45 p.m.
Time of crest - 5:15 p.m.
South Branch Ralston Creek at Muscatine Avenue
Approximate time of beginning of rise - 2:30 p.m.
Time of crest (leading edge) - 4:45 p.m.
For this flood, the heavy rainfall in the basin began in the hour
ending at 1:00 p.m., July 17, with the crest occurring approximately
4 hours later.
For seven other moderate stream rises (peak discharges all less than
550 cfs) for which Information was readily available, at the Rochester
gauge the time between beginning of rise and the crest varied from
I hour to 4-1/4 hours.
The time to peak at the two USf,S gauginn stat inns should be less than
that at Gilbert Street because the tributary drainage area at Gilbert
Street is almost three times that at the two gauging stations.
SHIVE•HATTERY& ASSOCIATES
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS•DES 1101NES
Marto to Board of Adjustment
March 12, 1979
Page Two
2. Flood peaks that occur between midnight and 6:00 a.m, would probably
cause more damage than those at other times of the day. The time
of the peak was available for 83 floods that were recorded at the
Rochester Avenue gauge between 1925 and 1977. Twenty-five of the 03
flood peaks occurred between midnight and 6:00 a.m., 22 between 6:00 a.m.
and noon, 16 between noon and 6:00 p.m., and 20 between 6:00 p.m. and
midnight. Thus, there is about one chance in 3.3 that when a flood
does occur, it will be in the midnight to 6:00 a.m. quarter of the
day. Time -of -peak information is available for 7 of the 8 major floods
(discharge greater than 1,000 cfs) that were recorded at the Rochester
Avenue gauge. Only one of the seven major floods occurred during the
midnight to 6:00 a.m. quarter.
3. The regulatory base flood Is the 100 -year flood - the flood that has
a 1 in 100 chance of occurring in any year. Coupling this frequency
with that discussed in the above paragraph indicates that there is
about 1 chance in 330 for a 100 -year flood to occur between midnight
and 6:00 a.m. in any year. The odds on the occurrence of other types
of property damage accidents are probably much less than these flooding
odds.
4. Velocity is directly related to conveyance which, in turn, is directly
related to depth of flooding and inversely related to the roughness of
the channel. Because the proposed parking lol is nearly level and the
roughness factor remains the same, there would prnhably not be a great
difference in velocity at a point near the streamward edge of the
parking lot and a point 10 meters landward.
5. The construction of flood water detention reservoirs in the Ralston
Creek basin should reduce the magnitude and the frequency of damaging
i floods. Obviously, such construction should also reduce the damage
potential at the parking lot in question.
Considering the above, it would appear that the approval of the special -use
I permit is justified.
I -
Sulo IJ. WiIta]a, P. E.
SWW:sd
SHIVE•HATTERY b ASSOCIATES
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS•DES I10111ES
MINUTES
RESOURCES CONSERVATION COMMISSION
FEBRUARY 27, 1979 4:30 P.M.
CIVIC CENTER CONFERENCE ROOM
MEMBERS PRESENT: Bolnick, Denniger, Hotka, Stager.
STAFF PRESENT: Tinklenberg, Lee.
RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE CITY COUNCIL
The Resources Conservation Commission recommends against the purchase
of the Hewlett-Packard programmable calculator.
SUMMARY OF DISCUSSION AND FORMAL ACTIONS TAKEN
Stager moved, Bolnick seconded, to approve the minutes of February
13, 1979, meeting as read. Approved unanimously.
CONCLUSIONS OF DISCUSSION CONCERNING PROGRAMMABLE CALCULATOR
Pros and cons were discussed. The pro is that it solves the
problems for the building owner. The cons are that the cost of it
is not justifiable, the City should act strictly as an inspector
not a consultant, and there will be a continual need for an engineer
to monitor the staff and machine performance.
Hotka moved, Bolnick seconded, to recommend against the purchase of
the calculator. Motion approved. Stager abstained.
National Energy Act Status Report.
The energy package was divided between the Commissioners for
analysis and summarization. They are recorded as below:
-The Natural Gas Policy Act and the Power Plant and Industrial
Fuel Use Act were analyzed by Hotka.
Hokta suggested that the National Gas Policy Act will not affect
the City in the near future. This Act mainly controls the price of
the natural gas and the development of additional gas reserves.
The price of natural gas is tied in with increases or decreases in
the Gross National Product. The Power Plant and the Industrial
Fuel Use Act contains an incremental change on the price of natural
gas used in the power and generating plants.
-The Public Utility Regulatory Policy Act was analyzed by Bolnick.
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOINES
607
MINUTES
RESOURCES CONSERVATION COMMISSION
FEBRUARY 27, 1979
PAGE 2
He reported two points of interest to the Commission:
1. Cogeneration of small power production for alternative
energy resources. It would require utilities to buy
energy from small power production units in order to
decentralize power production.
2. Title IV. The small hydroelectric power project providing
loans for studies on producing electricity with existing
dams may concern the City more. The loan repayment
schedule varies from 10 to 30 years.
-Energy Tax Act.
Stager stated that the main point of this Act is that a person
is entitled to a credit of 15 percent of the first $2,000 he or
she spends on the components to conserve energy at home, for a
maximum credit of $300. Also, a person can claim a credit of 30
percent of the first $2,000 plus 20 percent of the next $8,000
spent on renewable energy source equipment for a maximum credit
of $2,200.
-The National Energy Conservation Policy Act.
Denniger reported that the federal government has ordered
states to adopt energy policies in order to qualify for federal
aid.
The Commissioner agreed to prepare a detailed outline for the
energy package in a few weeks.
Tinklenberg reported that Professor Ellis will have students
working on the Public Utility Regulatory Policy Act only.
Recycling
Bolnick suggested that people be reminded of various
opportunities for recycling in Iowa City.
A list of recycling opportunities could be composed and mailed
to residents to remind them about recycling. Staff should find
out the cost of printing and mailing such a flier.
OTHER BUSINESS
Denniger mentioned nuclear fission as the cheapest way of
generating energy and that the possible problems and
possibility of system failure are misstated by TV programs. A
general discussion of nuclear fission followed.
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS•DES I40IRES
MINUTES
RESOURCES CLb. ERVATION COMMISSION
FEBRUARY 27, 1979
PAGE 3
Mandatory
ation of f"I use
Commission should analyze the Potentialaproblemext fall and the
Sta
should collect data on
the gasoline old per motor vehi�cleuin John on bymassand
The meeting adjourned at 6:00 P.M.
Respectfully submitted, Roger Tinklenberg, Katy Lee
Ira Bolnick, Secretary
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES
MINUTES
IOWA CITY HOUSING APPEALS BOARD
JANUARY 11, 1979
MEMBERS PRESENT:SMITHEY, OWENS, POLLOCK, HILLSTROM
MEMBERS ABSENT: GRAHAM, KLAUS
STAFF PRESENT: KUCHARZAK, BURKE, BOWLIN, MALONE, BARNES
Minutes of November 9, 1978 were approved as corrected.
Minutes of December 14, 1978 were approved as corrected.
Those who planned to testify were sworn in by the chairman.
BOARD TO CONSIDER THE CASE OF MR. THOMAS MARTIN -
125 RIVER STREET
Burke reviewed background information as contained in the staff report
and introduced drawings based on measurements 'taken at the time of
inspection. Malone described the conditions he observed during his
inspection.
Mr. Martin described the history of the house. He said the room has always
been popular with student renters, and has not been vacant since he
owned the property. Martin said drawings presented by staff were not
accurate and that he has 82 square feet of floor area. Martin said closing
the room would be an undue taking under the due process clause of the
I
Constitution.
Malone indicated that the area on the south side has a partition wall and is
used as a closet.
Hillstrom asked for clarification on the partition and doorway to closet.
i
Bowlin commented that citation is proper because the requirements are
unchanged from the State Code since 1919.
Hillstrom asked Smithey to review powers of the Appeals Board. Smithey
responded briefly.
Pollock moved to uphold both items as cited. Motion was not seconded.
Owens moved to uphold Item #5 (ceiling height) but not to uphold Item #4
(floor area). Hillstrom seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously.
i
f
(.0g
MICROFILMED BY
'1 JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 140114ES
IOWA CITY HOUSI..,; APPEALS BOARD
JANUARY II, 1979
Page 2
BOARD TO CONSIDER CASE OF MR. A. J. LAREW -
308 N. CLINTON
Chairman swore in those who would testify.
Burke presented background information as indicated in the staff report.
Burke withdrew both citations dealing with ventilation in the kitchenettes.
Inspector Barnes distributed floor plans of the building to those present.
These were drawn based on measurements taken during the inspection.
She referred to these and to a drawing placed on the blackboard to
describe the conditions she observed during her inspection. Barnes also
introduced photographs of the kitchenettes.
Larew said both bathrooms have windows.
Trott said that an architect named Carpenter designed the apartments in
1937 and that the plans were reviewed by the City. Trott said the Terry
Appeal sets a precedent relevant to this case. He said the Housing Code
is for the rich, that 64% of units inspected last month were in violation,
that Board members can make variations, that Supreme Court case 260-393
upholds his position, that if the unit can't be rented then it is taken
without compensation, that Denny vs. Mt. Vernon (50 -2nd -983) held that
the City had abused its police powers, so the violations should not be
upheld.
Holly Hart, a tenant in the property, testified that she had no problems
living in a small apartment.
I
Larew said rent control did not support the building. His income from the
building is diminished if he has to make changes. Tenants tike his small
apartments.
Bowlin established that kitchenettes have remained the same since 1937, but
Larew did not recall date that bedrooms were set up. Approval of plans by
the City could not be specifically verified.
Kucharzak pointed out that the Board is not empowered to grant variances.
Bowlin said the City objected to the Terry case decision and that it did not
set up a compelling precedent. He said the requirements under
consideration were established in 1919, long before Larew did the
remodeling of his property in 1937.
Burke drew a diagram on the blackboard to clarify bedroom layout. Trott
made concluding remarks to Bowlin and the Board members.
After comments from Hillstrom, Pollock and Smithey, Pollock moved to
uphold item #4 (minimum room size - bedrooms) and item #2 (minimum room
size - kitchenettes) as cited in the Notice of Violation. Hillstrom seconded
the motion. Motion carried unanimously.
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES
IOWA CITY HOUSI
JANUARY II, 1979
Page 3
APPEALS BOARD
BOARD TO CONSIDER CASE OF BREESE & CO. -
521 KIRKWOOD
Chairman swore in those who would testify. Poula said he and his client
were appearing in order to take the case to court,'after exhausting the
administrative remedy of the Appeals Board. He agreed to install a
handrail on the steps without further contesting the item, after he viewed
a photograph of the property. A completion date was not established
during the meeting.
Burke presented background of the case as contained in the staff report.
Inspector Barnes related her observations in the field and presented
photographs of the contested items.
Poula argued that police powers of the City do not apply to the items
contested. He felt these were a matter of aesthetics. Poula said there is
no factual dispute being offered, but requested the citations be overruled.
Mr. Breese concurred.
Bowlin inquired about the gutters and the reference to the Reihmann case
mentioned by Poula.
I
Poula stated the house is an an MI zone.
i
Kucharzak recited the order to show that aesthetics were not the concern
here. Poula disagreed.
Hillstrom commented on aesthetics and gutters. Smithey asked Barnes to
clarify her observation of the gutters and fence.
Hillstrom moved that items #I, 3 & 5 of the Notice of Violation be upheld as
cited. Pollock seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously.
I OTHER BUSINESS
Burke requested that the Board consider meeting every two months instead
of on a monthly basis. He and Kucharzak explained that the monthly
schedule was causing administrative problems. After some discussion,
Owens moved that the Board schedule its next meeting for the second
Thursday in March at 8:00 AM. Hilstrom seconded the motion. Motion
carried unanimously.
4
Meeting was adjourned.
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS•DES 1101NES