HomeMy WebLinkAbout1974-09-17 Regular MeetingG•]
Looeo
/�1� w� ...
_ /�S- !�
Regular
R 0 L L C A L L
MEETING OF September 17, 1974
—7: 30 P.M.
PRESENT ABSENT
BRANDT ✓
CUdWCKI
DAVIDSEN ✓
dePROSSE ✓
WHITE
J
Council Minutes-_
1974
f
t
iaterial` to the =landfill and.` sueested other sites_
iuncilE discussed the' present- Robert
rV7i
procedure:.
edrques_tionng bjdding<=prpce.dure,, noting that
s ;are out' before ;the resolution of necessity is
;oincil The procedure .was-.explained.
_,present
t"byWhy to and seconded> by,.Brandt-- to, adopt the
if U'p ri roll, call Brandt;-Czarnecki,
lite votedr'aye', deProsse not-present for :roll call.
ed The Mayor then `declared the public hearing
:zaTrnecki announcedthat this was the'time set for
iearing'on'_Plans .''`Syecfications and:-Form of Contract_
t=University�ProJect, Iowa R=14,Demolition and Site
�ntract'��4 * �It was moved',by'Davidsen. and seconded
adopt 'ahe Resol ition °' Up`,on ;roll call Czarnecki,
lite, Brandtwoted' 'taye,-' , deProsse voted 'no'.
Led: h'ex being no others":present to speak, the
t
ed•' the'rhearing >closed�
ror6=announcZI;ed" that, this- was the time,'rset for the
cif on the 1Resoluti.on of Necessity. for the Lower
Dennis Kraft, ;Director .of Community: Develop=
'd< that ahe.9cbst 'of thea project _Would'be $101,U00
p^aids under x theK D,avisBacori Act : Dick Plastino ,
s Drector§noted that the pro�e,ct-would be 'federally
wastmoved bZlry Davidsen and ; econded- by, deProsse to
;
asolution.s „Upon roll :call Davidsen, . deProsse,, White,,
rrteckiw voted 'Y' aye °- Motion °carried. " There being
eak,:the=Mayor declared the.,hearing closed.
Czarnecki announced that this was' the' `time `set for
fearing on Phans.=Spec f x-c"at ions ' 4h& Form of-Contract
2tr.'=Park; Road' Proi`ect. It 'was; moved by deProsse and
Davi.dsen to -adopt the`Resolutibn - , Upon roll 'call
ute, , Brandt;rCzarnecki, Davidseri voted 'aye' .
Led There-�being ono one present,:;to speak, the Mayor
e Bearing-.-.closed '.`
yor announced that this was!-.the time set for the
ring 'on 'an0rdinance•=Amendirig'Chapter 4 21 of the
Code)-.° tir-ohi-bitine interfereince with.`an - agent authorized
:those provsions'=pertainine Pet, 'Animals There,
ne present to= speak; f the `Mayor declared the hearing
Czarnecki announced that this was the time: sat for
h-earina on ayroyosed'Ordinance'Establishing a
Office =(CO) =Zone: There being :one present to
,no
Mayor declared the hear,ijIosed.
-hLT: - 'T. .-u .. _ <�•"i-, 4=� ,L ...i�tS _l F� . •L . .'= n µ 'i J:.. , i . - _ _ -
_ - .i'ti5
-Page-
- _
Counc
bepresen
much the:
no ting w. th
Having _.bi
of `profes.
wishing h
many peop
the:bette
seconded;
iuouncvi riinutes .
" � _ �$eptember 17, ,1974 'yt
1man White noted that the City:Manager could not
at' the meet` ng,' and ad,ded:;that:'he regretted very
warture' o1".1 -1 -Ray Wells as City Manager: of Iowa City ,
i`le is a professional ofsabsolutely highest quality;
ug?t aN great deal :to tl%e City of Iowa City in terms
tonal,management; ;and leavinD much with us; also
n well,;as they entire Council does He commented that
e in the- community, share his`,feeUng' that we: are much
fcr Ray; Well"s for'_ having come this .way . The:'Mayor
LW sentiment:'
loran Wh,te,,advised that' the, Executive` Board of .the
iarning Commission will continue to pursue the application/�
ILaw. Enforcement Te- asibility;::Study:. ti
moved by Davidsen;and''seconded by White that the
uspended andtthe`third rea$in� of the Ordinance
a-:P"ortion of`O1d jFirst Avenue be given. by -tit e /��
n;roll-callyWhite, Brandt,"Czarnecki; Davidsen,!
oted !aye' Motion carried ;and ._third; reading given
nly; Lt wasmoved_by Davidsen'.and seconded by
-
o ado12 `th'e_Ordinance., .Upon roll call Brandt,
Davidsen; deProsse, White woted;.'aye'. Motion carried.
moved by deProsse and seconded by.White that the
r._,
uspended and; he third readine of the Ordinance to
Zoning<;Code-to Estabhish Height' Regulations for 'the
ern by title only ', 'Upon roll..'call- Czarnecki,
deP,ro'sse, Whte,'vBrandt voted 'aye'. Motion carried
readinggiveri by titleonly: It :,was. moved by deProsse
ed zby White- to ado t..the,'-Ordinance _ :Upon roll `call
deProsse, Whi, Bran t, Czarnec_ i, voted aye' Motion
.z ste� -
moved by 'deProsse and seconded liy White to defer the
Y
to-Vacaan Easement+`Ac'ros`s Veterans Administration:
t the Intersection of ;.Woolf ---Avenue and LNewton Road
ek-: Gregoryt Haag Assi_stantKDirector of Veterans
tion Hospital<'appeared-with--additional information of
opposingthe°constructi.on 'f'the ramp.,. Upon roll
sse, White ;voted '_aye'; Braridt,'Davidsen and Czarnecki
~:Motion defeated It was :moved,by;Brandt and seconded
n;to .adopt ahe:Ordiriance,.wth tYe condition if the
ructure-`is=:not;liuiltYand if'the>-easement is''not'np,-eded,
evert:=back:`to"the:Cit : Council :discussed: the. separate
Veterans Admini.stratiori Upon roll ,call Brandt;
wit
Davidsen voted 'ay e' :deProsse and White voted 'no'..
-ried
i
l
1
y
c'.
•a 5..� .Y.S�r -.l v.irYwl Lu ,. �' ...a .a! v .. -.. x . .. -`-. .. ...
01
ad t
aD
e7
Tut 3. 0
David
the R
ment_;-
r� r
.--arran
-'by ''VL
i -lu
nc
-Bra
ImOtIO;
Resoli
.:,and - Hi
'.Upon--.,
Voted
th`6': R(
For E
ca=7_
motio*1
It
-Resol
.-Inc .'
Upon J
o ed
-Resolt
Inc..
&e7r—o E
carri c
U
CouncilMinute's
September S 6
19,74
-oss
seconded avidsen to
tion
0 r artite grapment with
woo&,,��.Co oredo'-- as-,�;previous ly. Author i z -.d = by
nsdtiori->-Ap.,�reemdnt���-W3'-th:-P,ay S.' Wells, Rc-so
Pbn-�ro-1,1---ca�ll.l.'�-Wh:Lte,'�---Brandt, Czamecki,
se`voted 'aye'Motion carried
b D a -'v" Lds en and'seconded by Brandt to adopt
uCh4orizin Continuance -,'master Trust Agree -
o
AA'�.Ret lremenv%' or o ation and��t
at �authorization
.id;.�Ethe,,-p�d.kti,-Cil3�at:Lon-in `deferredcomRensatio�ther
,�StA tir ers�-,611,2�ible',for parti tion
CIP
Lr�-_Uidmbej�shit5-',iii! 1pr'of es s I onal organizations
t h eY M a s t e ri.,� Trust, i'Ag r Upon" on roll—'ca =
L: �'��Davidsen.1�*-deProsse ed 'aye'.
Wh 1:t e vo t
by1Brandt and
seconded by.'.White to adopt
the
-the Hawkeye Roofing,
Ic6riti- for`
the
i���tor t Civic Center Roof -Repair
tarriiecki'-�'i�.--�xDaivi'dsbit:�'deProssd, White, Brandt
carriedaon -
Z -%7
iind.;,�, seclp'n:
d:- -d
eProsse. to adopt
.-An 1 -Bond ifor Bark6_7s, In
Trov g�1dontr-a-etT' d o C
:tart' -'Lan df i-11,1
Excavation Project. Upon roll
,Pros s e',,*,Mhi t Brand �'Czarnecki voted 'aye
�by.'-"�Davi-dg'dii,,-an.'d:,�'�'.q `seconded, o-nded':b White to
, - .- - - , . - Y jj!dgpt the
r;L Coht
ra and for Road Builders
-ut:Lon--"",Contr6l--gP]�-ant—RoadwAy tPaving o 1 e c -t --f 1..
Pr
t&; --z Brandt Czarnecki' Davidseri
ion4' carried
_by Whte'aid seconded by:.deProsse to adopt the
or Road Builders,
'iiig on ac
ege---,19 tree t�-P arkinw-�-�Lot Upon roll call.
Braridt*,�g"Czarrii�tki-.-,avidsen vote d 'aye' Motioni7�
ki noted
,�receipvo'jdf. 'ter from Glen Nius.
tti6 let
s ofil on Environ
Johnson" -:Count V:
Z-1: fte'.-Aatest
orwardi 71 -'z1draftfof the noise Ord'
eet1nP,b4'-
a,:'�set "�,��After , discussion, _t
u I d -F, schedule � � I —d iif_Cdunc -discussion
U
e and
r zlil
M
C
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF SEPTE11BER 17, 1974
7:30 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERSr CIVIC CENTER
410 EAST WASHINGTON
•
Item No. 4 - PUBLIC DISCUSSION. %`,t , ; { f V, ,bn 1
r/Crs�ac�i'�
a
:1
r;; �r.4•rt/l-t c 1'liL, — l-1 �,l- A>aa-, �rr� 1^[+c/�-
1 N' -Z '.I of a
I�
b�
04 Of 3
ao-r• 1�� Coktlotit?nPcb propp��•��s. "
T ��',dlr1s �1tXttJr��G.ee tTN 1 F� f1J112 L� ? Eiri/C,osIN4
V ,
7� {`
//�fY ..•�I- ��i w C �'l !]fie .c. (7E t fr- 11 S• /-f i'CL-1t
Item No. 5 - RECEIVE MINUTES OF BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS.
a. Human Relations Commission minutes of August 26, 1974, meeting.
b. Design Review Committee minutes of August 26, 1974, meeting.
Action: �✓ rl t J2 / I i Gl �� a -cam
5
t
I
AGENDA
c
REGULAR
COUNCIL
MEETING
SEPTEMBER
17, 1974
7:30 P.M.
a
Item No. 1 -
MEETING TO ORDER
CALL �� kf
_
}-7'c.c. ).t
ROLL Q IaeS�
/
rr'C/ 'C Qeco�cLl is 1
�,
Item No. 2
- READING OF MINUTES OF
REGULAR
DOL
OUNCIL MEETING
OF SEPTEMBER 10, 1974.
Item No. 3
- MAYOR'S PROCLAMATION.-
w� t of" L 1 `'` . • 'd a ` fE '
a. Week of Ccncern
For World Hunger-- September
22-29, 1974.
Item No. 4 - PUBLIC DISCUSSION. %`,t , ; { f V, ,bn 1
r/Crs�ac�i'�
a
:1
r;; �r.4•rt/l-t c 1'liL, — l-1 �,l- A>aa-, �rr� 1^[+c/�-
1 N' -Z '.I of a
I�
b�
04 Of 3
ao-r• 1�� Coktlotit?nPcb propp��•��s. "
T ��',dlr1s �1tXttJr��G.ee tTN 1 F� f1J112 L� ? Eiri/C,osIN4
V ,
7� {`
//�fY ..•�I- ��i w C �'l !]fie .c. (7E t fr- 11 S• /-f i'CL-1t
Item No. 5 - RECEIVE MINUTES OF BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS.
a. Human Relations Commission minutes of August 26, 1974, meeting.
b. Design Review Committee minutes of August 26, 1974, meeting.
Action: �✓ rl t J2 / I i Gl �� a -cam
® item No- 6 - CONSIDER SETTING PUBLIC HEARING ON THE DISPOSITION OF VACATED
PROPERTY.
Comment: At its September 10, 1974, meeting the City Council received a
request to purchase .a parcel of vacated land, the west half of an
alley near the intersection of Lafayette St. and Maiden Lane.
This public hearing is the next step in the disposition process.
Action:
1,1S. A N0 -gyp,
Item No. 7 - PUBLIC HEARING ON THE RESOLUTIC`I OF NECESSITY FOR THE CITY -UNIVERSITY
/ y
PROJECT, I -14 DEMOLITION AND SITE CLEARANCE CONTRACT #4. �--e-
, ,.`//Jl
4/G 4 U
r A. CONSIDER RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY. BA� Z �tt�K
1 P PLIC RING ON PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND FORM OF CONTRACT71FOR t -e_
THE CITY-UNIVERSITY_PROJECT, IOWA R-14 DEMOLITION AND SITE CLEARANCE
(' CONTRACT 04.
Comment:
,Sed
Fel Acti n.
ein �
Item No. 8,-
4407
Comment:
Action:
B. CONSIDERx,/� ZlG4- l
RESOLUTION SING PLANS 'AND SPECIFIC/ATIONS. /� / CZ -4
The above resolutions are necessarytoinitiate the Urban Renewal
Demolition Contract No. 4. Under this project the structures on 33
parcels will be demolished. It is estimated that this project will
cost approximately $236,000. n �f ,�� ��5q'� '"'7
Col.
7r p ISAvssb>"CKlxf l(1V.n0N-S�t-4400 N1.l.e0r - 1�, �ckc3 n y
A
eo, �
{'AOt r0 .0 P r e�v�' �,'f i c. ,oc T AM.e.
2
r1v;�
II----- - OF NECESSITY FOR THE LOWER PARK
ROAD PROJECT.
A. CONSIDER
ON /THE SOLUTION
UTIONO NECESSITY.
Pt,1_ C fwd
ANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND FORM OF CONTRACT FOR
PROJECT.
PUBLIC HEARING ON
THE LOWER PARK R
P�
AL RESOLUT16N APPROVING PLANS AW SPECIF ICATIIO S. 41 C %i Vie,
The aboveresolution is required to authorize the Lower Park Road Paving
Project Under this project Lower Park Road will be relocated westerly
to a higher elevation and paved to extend the public's utilization of
Lower/Park. It -is anticipated that this project will be completed
approximately December 1, 1974. It is estimated that this construction
project will cost approximately $98;@fJ0
!a!
' tal DUD <v.' -to GJn �,. Q V +t+
1, 1
�!c!c t 14s�wO p w, rt
F'U�.�ip�
3t
�f
r ({ r `i V � S '- � i c a - l t(� J _ � ' � ✓ J c 5 " '.. A 5 t.,. .yb�y1 tyq-r'{`.
� s
rN L,
-. oi
7
It4:9PLO.
1 f 1 fes, 1 �a
-'•�J.teaGl`"Y_.ex
- _ :. - .. _ _ Gl�t.ifC_ Cw�l�•-fi':__. c%i-t� r�.Q L.. _ - ! l; et.. . i. .��
--
Ye. e ,..� C `
rteJZ—
rjt✓' !�f !9 f
r
VL
V , u --� � � •:`_r _..-c,c�
^`� ci.
�_ P?tom. c_, c��-."1.-
l ,
__. - - "� ,(/eta � �..�-j�—t�e•�,.. ��..�[.e��-C�i:.,�t t_. L•..� n _.'-' .- _ .... .- !f--
.. t, -Z 7171-1 C L. 1-�1 b b
r '
v 1x r
_ fie.-- id ;♦ - -
5 x 'i
Agenda_
Page 3 • ..•
S tember 17 1974
® Item No. 9 - PUBLIC HEARING ON AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 4.21 OF THE MUNICIPAL
CODE OI-' IOWA CITY.
Comment-: This ordinance is to provide and allow for the enforcement of the
provisions of Chapter 4.21 by prohibiting interference with an
agent authorized to enforce those provisions (Pet Animals).
P,�1.opek, '
C]
Action:
V 4'e
Item No. 10 - PUBLIC HEARING ON A PROPOSED ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A COMMERCIAL OFFICE
(CO) ZONE. Z-7416. -
Comment: The Planning and Zoning Commission on August B, 1974, recommended
by a 5-0 vote the adoption of an ordinance to amend the Zoning Code
establishing a Commercial Office (CO) Zone exclusively for office
and /r/elated development.
Action:
/V. n�OSrN�
Item No. 11 - BUSINESS FROM THE CITY COUNCIL.
G
( V
at r,.Po
Item No. 12 - CONSIDER ORDINANCE TO VACATE A PORTION OF COLD FIRST AVENUE
(Third Reading)
V-7403.
Comment: Due to the recent realignment of First Avenue between Lower Muscatine
Road and Bradford Drive, the Planning and Zoning Commission on July
11, 1974, recommended by a 4-0 vote vacation of a portion of the old
Agenda
Page 4
September
Z-
17, 1974 -
Item No. 12 - (CONTINUED)
right-of-way and vacation of an easement over the CRI&P Railroad for
the old alignment, illustrations of the vacated portions are included
7 33 in the July 11, 1974, Staff Report. Public hearing was held August 27,
- - --- 1974.
Action: el, ,
Item No. 13 - CONSIDER ORDINANCE TO AMEND ZONING CODE TO ESTABLISH HEIGHT REGULATIONS
/
FOR THE R3 ZONE. Z-7413. (Third Reading)
Comment: Due to an oversite, height regulations for buildings in the R3 Zone
were never adopted although it was intended that the site and struc-
tural requirements would be the same as for the R2 Zone. The Planning
and Zoning Commission on July 25, 1974,'recommended by a 5-0 vote
approval of a proposed ordinance establishing height restrictions
egqu_ivalent1 to the R2 Zone. Public hearing was held on (August 27, 1974.
Action:y�C W 13rT0 l', 2�4(/4+>�. y •?'ty
Item No. 14 - CONSIDER ORDINANCE TO VACATE AN EASEMENT ACROSS VETERANS ADMINISTRATION
� 3-
PROPERTY AT THE INTERSECTION OF WOOLF AVENUE AND NEWTON ROAD.
Comment: This item was previously considered during the regular Council meeting
of September 10, 1974, as Item No. 16.
pp % � �
Action: QC2�(.V
' / � 7 �C��' Cv t.(� W� a d..l 1 ar..� I �•+ IBJ �.yl l
Item No. 15 - CONSIDER RESOLUTIONS AUTHORIZING TRIPARTITE AGREEMENT WITH CITY OF
(f�O LAKEWOOD, COLORADO_
Comment: On December 21, 1973, the City Council authorized a Deferred Compen_r_
,Eat ion Acrizi-,eMi t with --Pay S Wells,_Resolution-A7_3.-5-{_7: The City of
Lakewood, Colorado has entered into a similar agreement between
Mr. Wells and the International City Management Association Retire-
ment Corporation as Trustee. The City has no present or future need
for the fundssofar deposited with the Trustee under its Agreement,
and to avoid further continuing expense in maintaining the records of
said Trust Agreement it is recommended that the Mayor be authorized to
execute an Agreement with the City of Lakewood and the Trustee for the
transfer of_s11 funds) aepcsited.
Action: 1 :�(J / C/_� .+r �Le r2
V `
- i'-" �, .QQ �`,�.�T,,` �`! � `� If'-' `'rt. Iii •rr it"� _ ' l?Y
irk
elfr
r
-
, l
_.... ... --- - ._ -.__ . ---------_. ��-""�_-t. - L7-f_..-.-� .1.2. <I� f f-�-c�...• - r." ,. f J i� 1 ;�: / !r. �-r....
J
\
J--
+ 1p E
_ _ � ill- a � c� i ,�-r-a`°"..• Stitt— _`._ \tJ'a_-" � z�-- - - "1- . ._._
V4..,t i i C tt.... 1.._� _ i�% .. /` _
LJL) 1 r —
a— f 2n.. t -a-�G_ c. ` - - ..-.G-` t _
1 ,
t1 (�t� 3V � r I , -� _� ___l __-.-� _._. �_LL..C� If.�QFeCLGGl �1. �,�t .✓ w_ ♦. ;. ��.�. [ �a ��.. — __ _
�- L Y Lam..-a-�a.4- J. L_'�•-. .------- 1 L t' � - � ,
L Ie
Ii.i;J�(.cJ.1
...ti� V`ri•7 t f` e- iJ"'v1r r. �.�.. _ r ✓Lf;.!%G� . Y7-C!'�^ �n p.J.<-ac.-C.,_.-
-- -. C -
/
�l
i
® Item No. 16 - CONSIDER RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING CONTINUANCE OF A MASTER TRUST AGREE-
MENT WITH THE ICMA RETIREMENT CORPORATION.
Comment: In the resolution of December 21, 1973, authorizing a deferred com-
pensation agreement with Ray S. Wells, the Council also authorized
the execution of a Master Trust Agreement with the International
City, Management Association Retirement Corporation as Trustee for the
deposit of funds. It is recommended that this agreement be continued,
and that authorization_be-.given^,to_expand__the_,participation in deferred
compensation arrangements to, other staff members eligible for partici-
patign" .of-their.membership.... in -.professional_ organizations
included under the..Master._Trust .Agreement.. 1
rr
Action:
�^lilrn. lL, � ?ra.. I'....�T.a-d'p. R...--1 � �.J J!'t./
DQ
Item No. 17 - CONSIDER RESOLUTION APPROVING CONTRACT AND BOND FOR THE HAWKEYE ROOFING
Item No. 19 - CONSIDER RESOLUTION APPROVING.CONTRACT AND BOND FOR IOWA ROAD BUILDERS,
ql Z INC. FOR THE POLLUTION CONTROL PLANT ROADWAY PAVING PROJECT #1.
Comment: This resolution approves the Mayor's signature on the contract and
bond for award of this contract. The award of this contract was made
attheCi�ty� Council meeting
/on September 3, 1974, as Item No. 22.
Action:
® Item No. 20 - CONSIDER RESOLUTION APPROVING CONTRACT AND BOND FOR IOWA ROAD BUILDERS,
INC. FOR THE COLLEGE STREET PARKING LOT PROJECT.
Comment: This resolution approves the Mayor's signature on the contract and
bond for award of this contract. The award of this contract was
AND HOME REPAIR COMPANY, FOR
THE.CIVIC CENTER ROOF REPAIR PROJECT.
/0
Comment:
This resolution approves the
Mayor's signature on the contract and bond
for award of this contract.
The award of this contract was made at the
City Council meeting on September 3, 1974, as Item No. 20.
Action:
I3p, Itu
®
ll
Item No. 18
- CONSIDER RESOLUTION APPROVING CONTRACT AND BOND FOR BARKER'S INC. FOR
41/ 1
THE 1974 SANITARY LANDFILL EXCAVATION
PROJECT.
Comment:
This resolution approves the
Mayor's signature on the contract and
bond for award of this contract. The award of this contract was made
at City meeting
onSeptember3, 1974, as Item No. 23.
fthe /Council
)/
Action:
�L / C��_
�C/GL 1 GL-E.�2��0
Item No. 19 - CONSIDER RESOLUTION APPROVING.CONTRACT AND BOND FOR IOWA ROAD BUILDERS,
ql Z INC. FOR THE POLLUTION CONTROL PLANT ROADWAY PAVING PROJECT #1.
Comment: This resolution approves the Mayor's signature on the contract and
bond for award of this contract. The award of this contract was made
attheCi�ty� Council meeting
/on September 3, 1974, as Item No. 22.
Action:
® Item No. 20 - CONSIDER RESOLUTION APPROVING CONTRACT AND BOND FOR IOWA ROAD BUILDERS,
INC. FOR THE COLLEGE STREET PARKING LOT PROJECT.
Comment: This resolution approves the Mayor's signature on the contract and
bond for award of this contract. The award of this contract was
Ir
4.113 made at the City Council meeting on September 3, 1974, as Item
No. 21.
Action: W 19LO ,
1
Item No. 21 - CORRESPONDENCE TO THE CITY COUNCIL.
a
a. Letter from Glen N�jus, Administrative Assistant, Johnson
County Commission on Environmental Quality, forwarding the
latest draft of the noise ordinance ��4j t q_Vltcr L..�r
Action: rt { '. i.c �� n•� Ll l �F t (i A ���
Item No. 22 - ISSUANCE OF PERMITS. L) t'!
EdL)C eff..�),
I11.�ID.YCYS JM1V,t L'O I A
a. Consider resolution refunding Cigarette permit to James and
Marilyn Melendy dba/Kwik Shop. rr-.
w ,v. f; O
, `� ` Z�a
Action: ( _ D Y , 6 {li_,e c_.-� <L _ E: r
E
b. Consider resolution
refunding Beer
Permit to James and Marilyn
T
Melendy dba/Kwik Shop.
1 /y
t
I
J(
Action:
l�
all 0-ti4 2
D
!1/6
c. Consider resolution
approving Class
C Beer Permit application for
-
Dale E. Watt dba/Watt's Food Market, 1603 Muscatine Ave.
Action:
(�L�
et
K_l (JGL
I
d. Consider resolution
refunding Beer
Permit for Ernest Stoppelmoor
d(ba/The Links, 1011
Arthur.
Action:
�G- 1 �—� Ltf C
C� f. r"_.t ;_-
CJ
Item No. 23
- REPORT ON MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS FROM THE CITY
MANAGER AND THE CITY
ATTORNEY.
r
.V
n 11� C
E
-:�
V`fN7
v
I
J /
..
{
i
_-
—_1_ i _s't
-..t.. .iii ,_�.' :S�
—... _-. .. GL.:!.� ���tt_,I? z.-✓ _
� n
Item No. 24 - PUBLIC DISCUSSION.
C
Item No. 25 - ADJOURNMENT.
rang- _�Ip
12. 1 1 .,-.
e .
ITES,-OEXA
-j.REGULA-WL
-ZDOUIN ?,AEETI 115
I
SEPTE ER 10 J,U.;.
Z�
-- 1974 '
7 p
.0
ity City
ounci,L--,m6,t:,Lijjf,�,,
xegular,session.on
.,Se'p't'*e"m'b'e'r, -197.4'-�-;':'.j'it'-'�"7--;.'3-0"�,'-'.P;- M_'
in the Council
Civi
ib'er'sp"'r"-e's-e-rit*-:-,'BrAhft`-'Czarnecki:,' :deProsse,
Davidsen MaY..or.,
-,-.CzarneckEiiding. :The
pre
.t,,��KXM,-Rdd g
meeting, portionsfluter` are atti th'e :discretion of the :1
radio
station
ontrolledzby he`City`or the Council.'
:by e roqs,-,-"dd'
ed'b P� �e`an` seconded; e:.to
Vh3t.., con-
-and to
UE6-st of the'
Meet f
....... Meeting o September
Motion,oorrecfion carried
i d
ourne,'r'epresenting Campus: �Mij�iiSters, app
eared
Housing' situation ` He urged a6l6rating
long --
s e -j
jcondidiiat n:."p an:
dinance establish
ontro 9%.Ejusari Bird6fir.'appeared :presenting:
'oriL:o
i4d, y=`eligious.Leaders
lovok'WX 't 'Assocsoc iati" f
t -o -off i�
11qm&� or
rent: t was moved
pe wt`thestateuent
be -- received
ion`carredMa-
yor., iarneckl,replied pres
ent
ken -
ed by deProsee an _,.secohded--byWhite that the
meetings.. of the R f -k ontCommission;
8/-29/7,4;
s ion, 8/.21/74
Housing .- Commission,
, pointed
r -.Czarnecki
ot omidarr 0
.`COundkIZA theHousing:;j
`minutes: 'as. -'follows : to
uncil--Afi'-
thdyiwould eWk .A1rig,;to. sell- owneddeveloper and to .
ijje-.,what is ava1 1-
i able. He
cItr,ounp t .an oes,, no - pate:
tici-
e� '
_,y;!owned-
,
man,.de-Prosse
n to they public Lmeeting: on I r:25th 'to
ty,Devehopment Housing `-L-'--'--seconded ,
-T- re , i,sla-t'
l
on_.
�dby-White'afdby trandt-
that the f trm
h "-`V-i'�-xeta ned- a in
-1 4 1 - ' - J'
mpany,-,-,
_C icago, i to. assist
amity ,,the :,terms. zas
set.,out-in the
ab`er 3rd regarding the=3scope; -bfseivices:.Motion
6.
iecki
stated `he 'Edd'
not; been;. able to find a
isit Legislationland would try to get It before
leed
-,' also ,--not!Ek from Glenn'
71
Atxve�! 6r:-�A`J*q'hn"6'.on`
s s
�'.,.County Commission
2 Council Minutes
w
f®
Pag
1 �„
on _ Env x
control:
om a
.dates of
mental Qualitywith a rough ,draft_ .noise
attentc
dinance,;reque"sting' a point meeting between _the
dedicati
eptember-25th and�October',2rid`. ,The Mayor 'called
He " remit
to.:the" change= of the Bicentennial observation for
f or WSUI
of=the Cour:thouaerywhich is reset' for.October 20th.
suggeste,
d the Council' of aj taping `at' 9 00; A:M.' tomorrow
who.: comE
the 23rd1,andY,24th The Mayor
City go
roadcast-on
the>City; host: a receptton forj ForeignStudents
-letter .;t
o thelUnivers`ityVcampusto`,promote.familiarity with
' =that he
riment. Preferental;streatment and .present orientation
Library?.
ng �sentwere-- discussed:F rMayor Czarnecki advised.
modifidi
he ;City;, -Manager and City Attorney had met with the
procedui
�d Airport Commission representatives,to dis'cuss_the
Chairpei
do;of agreement with the EEOC relative to personnel'
cning
er
�. <The. Mayor' ;advised of receipt .of a. 16tt6r from
cedure'
Sarah Fox,.>Parks and Recreation Commission con -
Manager;;
ie -Commission';s area of FsurveillAnce, .referral pro-
to 'disc
= , y.,.. ♦ x c v t t -
tpitol.Improvement Budget and operating budget. -City,
bydePrj
llsZ reportedK ;a' Staff be held °Wednesday
4meeting�;would
.with ;the 'Commision:' It'was moved;
tHese` areas - s
ie and 'seconded by ;White that'the'letter from. arah
•eived'arid fired 'Motion carried:Brandt voting 'no'.
rules bi
Amend tl
moved'lbyr White` aad>secorded by `:deProsse .that the
procedu:
3s
ands;the third''re'adinj of Ordinance to
easemer
suspended .the
'Sub division a estHblisliirlg requirements .and
call Br,
,0raina-n
s for the placenierit`andcertfication',of utility
absent.=
kon,final ;ata,.,by title _only. Upon,. roll
It --1
dt,<_Czarnecki; deProsae White voted. 'aye',; Davids en
-`was
Ordinan
Kotion ;and third reading'given` by ;title.` oni%y.
voted
,,carried
ved` by White and s_econdediby''deP,rosse. to adopt the
It
<;:Upon :roll` call 'Czarnecki`, : dePross:e,: White, Brandt
miles :b
e' ; sDavidsen {absent' Motion carried.,''
to vasa
eas emen
as moved;'b'y deProsse,and seconded by White that'the
given b
suspended and the "second reading ;;of .Ordinance
Czarnec
,the'
Portion of Old st Avenue:.anl vacation_of an
second:;
a
over the-CRI&P Railroad"for'the=old alignment be
It
title only '.Upon roll calla.`deProsse, . White', Brandt,
rules ':b
voted 'aye' r-Davdsen absent Motion .carried and
toAmer
adrig en' title' only
for the
'White;'
•
carriec
2 Council Minutes
w
r _` September 10, 1974
F-
1 �„
om a
mental Qualitywith a rough ,draft_ .noise
dinance,;reque"sting' a point meeting between _the
eptember-25th and�October',2rid`. ,The Mayor 'called
to.:the" change= of the Bicentennial observation for
of=the Cour:thouaerywhich is reset' for.October 20th.
d the Council' of aj taping `at' 9 00; A:M.' tomorrow
the 23rd1,andY,24th The Mayor
roadcast-on
the>City; host: a receptton forj ForeignStudents
o thelUnivers`ityVcampusto`,promote.familiarity with
riment. Preferental;streatment and .present orientation
ng �sentwere-- discussed:F rMayor Czarnecki advised.
he ;City;, -Manager and City Attorney had met with the
�d Airport Commission representatives,to dis'cuss_the
do;of agreement with the EEOC relative to personnel'
�. <The. Mayor' ;advised of receipt .of a. 16tt6r from
Sarah Fox,.>Parks and Recreation Commission con -
ie -Commission';s area of FsurveillAnce, .referral pro-
= , y.,.. ♦ x c v t t -
tpitol.Improvement Budget and operating budget. -City,
llsZ reportedK ;a' Staff be held °Wednesday
4meeting�;would
.with ;the 'Commision:' It'was moved;
tHese` areas - s
ie and 'seconded by ;White that'the'letter from. arah
•eived'arid fired 'Motion carried:Brandt voting 'no'.
moved'lbyr White` aad>secorded by `:deProsse .that the
3s
ands;the third''re'adinj of Ordinance to
suspended .the
'Sub division a estHblisliirlg requirements .and
,0raina-n
s for the placenierit`andcertfication',of utility
kon,final ;ata,.,by title _only. Upon,. roll
dt,<_Czarnecki; deProsae White voted. 'aye',; Davids en
Kotion ;and third reading'given` by ;title.` oni%y.
,,carried
ved` by White and s_econdediby''deP,rosse. to adopt the
<;:Upon :roll` call 'Czarnecki`, : dePross:e,: White, Brandt
e' ; sDavidsen {absent' Motion carried.,''
as moved;'b'y deProsse,and seconded by White that'the
suspended and the "second reading ;;of .Ordinance
,the'
Portion of Old st Avenue:.anl vacation_of an
a
over the-CRI&P Railroad"for'the=old alignment be
title only '.Upon roll calla.`deProsse, . White', Brandt,
voted 'aye' r-Davdsen absent Motion .carried and
adrig en' title' only
.1
F;
ase by4Whit'dz, seconded by.deProsse-that the
suspended arid'. -the, second reading of ,.the Ordinance
Zoning Corder to Height :;Regulations'
the; ;Establish;
3 Zoneb`e given by;title only Upon roll call deProsse,
andt, Czarnecki, voted ';aye',; Davidson'absent. Motion
end `'second reading given bvv.title only..
f
1 d t
�..
-
t t
Den'.
Developm
quiremen
back' dis
Ordinanc
garding,.
at;->'stree
by
-White
Zoning f
Cit
Re s o.lut
Public A
upon the
to_=insui
project-_
was movE
lution
voted i:'i
It.
the Rea(
tract w:
.perform
White d
It
the Res;:
Furnish
Signal
company
Czarnecki
It
the Res
ment'.Pr
of $289
Czarnec
leg -of
;September'
i
K Y
Kraft, :"°Directork of the Department of Community
diacusaedrthe O,rdinancelAmending the. Fence Re-
�f_ theZonip; code `reg;arding the height and,set-
ces`ofsfenc es at street intersections._ and: the
nending`Chapyter 3 38 of the Municipal. ode re-
ghtland°setback distances of shrubs; and hedges
ntersections ' It,wasjt;movedby Brandt and'seconded
ats the; wog ordinances -bse referred ,to `Planning and
recommendation to -1 Council Mot ion. carried.
ttorney. Hayek explained that HUD has -requested. the
Assigning Duties<_andi;R'esporisibil sties, of the Local
cy= toathe City Council -''of the City of Iowa City
ose Out of City UniversityProject ;I Iowa R-14,
hat administrative' d6n`tinu ;ty over .the urban renewal
maintained _afterproject`close out, be adopted. It
y Brandt and seconded bytWhite to adopt the Reso-
on,rol ,xcall White, Brandt •Czarnecl�i, deProsse
",Davidsei absent. Motion carried
i Bioved .by Brandt `and 'seconded by White to adopt
aon Authorizing Amendment_to Urban+Renewal Con-
Old CappitiJ Assodlates concerning developer s:'
deposit`. Up on.ro114c`alliBiandt, Czarnecki; deProsse
i 'ayE; Davidaen�absent. 22otion. carried:
3 moved byBrandt and' seconded :by White to adopt
ion Accepting the Work on;,Divi.sion:Il, Item 2 for
of�Equipment for,the .1974 Burlington Street Traffic'
;ram done by�Minnesota-Minng and Manufacturing
S t : Paul ,,1Rinn . ??�# the.' antrnait o£ $5 , 420. Upon ;roll call .
Prosser White, Brandtivoted 'aye', Davidsen absent. motion carried.-
_, r r;
s;moved by„deProsse and seconded by;.Brandt:to adopt
tion Accepting the Work on he`1973-Paving Assess-
amdone byeMetro_tPavers , 'Inc.: in "t
e amount
1 69 _Upons;roll?'callr deProsse, ;White, Brandt,
voted..' Davdsen`'absent. Motion carried.
s.moved by.=deProsse and seconded by. White to adopt
tion Authorizing°.the,;Mayor's'Signature'on`the Agree-.
e the ,City of Iowa City and L"o.caT610, International
not Firefi"ghters. Ugon�roll call ,deProsse, White,
arnecki voted 'aye,,Davidsen absent-: Motion 'carried.
Manager`Well's`tstmimarized=`his =report ona Traffic
g,}Study of- the Intersection of Woolf` Avenue and
�a.; advising that the ;traffic; did not warrant realign
tj:or reconstructi-on` and recommended ;that the .east
►1f Averiue,be' 'closed and theY`Veterans: Administration
1
_ 1 �`!�^.. . .'i3.h; 1 .v ...{tom 1 F ,�. CYC v ♦..�'�l t4e% vAn ♦ 1.1 .. . i -
1 _
�' Hospita
Fred Br,
was- mov,
be -defe,
voting__
It was�i
be defe
White V
absent-
It
letter-_
garding
referre
and rep
It
the • --app
808; Hud
It
letter;
be "rece
It
letter,;
Project
Board -f
It
lettere::
Republi
headqua
Manager
-leased:
o construct the curbs Neil.Hoffman� Clyde Ackerman„
i, Director of V A and.: Roy :McGinnis ;appeared.:; :It
by Brandt and secondeds by :Czarnecki that. Item 16
'd to'next week" Motion=defeated Brandr and`Czarneck
7e'' 'deProssef and Whi`teyvoting 'no' Davidsen absent. ^_
ped by White! and 'seconded by `deProsse.:that Item 16
d= for two weeks `F .:;Motion defeated; deProsse and
Lng !aye'', Brandt and Czarnecki voting 'no'. Davidsen
is moved b White and seconded b deProsse that the
y y_
3m Allan Ackerman',:State Department'of Health; re-
-7 mming poolmairitenance< be received• and filed and
o the City ;Manager~ for5neces'sary. corrective action
Motion carried._ ,>` _
asrmoved by,deProsse and` seconded byBrandt that
�ation for suspension of;taxes,.for,Rose_J. Beranek,
i Avenue '_be; approved = ';Motion- carried; White abstaining.
3s moved.by Brandt 'and seconded.byWhite that the
�m Jerry<Parr; 431 ;Kimball Road, regarding streets
�d and filed ;Motion carried`
;x
as moved by Brandt 'and seconded; byWhite that the
Dm Richard Summerwill'`re-garding:the,Iowa.City Sculpture
3e ;receitcedk and fi] ed aril referred` toth-.Design Review
recommendation Motion carried:'`..
as. moved -by -Brandt -and seconded by deProsse that the '
�m Donald E.=;P_e'terson; Chairman, Johnson County
v- Central. Committee,4regarding."space for :campaign
�rs,be received and'_filed. Motion carried:; City
allsrecommended that no'Urban Renewal property be
3s.moved:by,�Brandt and seconded by, White that the
�m B W. `_Sheridan; 102 Potomac Drive, regarding the
�f vacated property be received ,and."filed and referred
ty Manvger anal: City: Attorney :to -,prepare the 'necessary
�cuments :for -the saletiof land - Motion' :carried.
;,
Czarnarki stated thattthe'Council discussed the
)m veor,e-A.`Cole; Mayor_of SiouxCity,.'regarding
for Iowa cities' at the`informal'session and the
avored State ``assistance`iiistead'af='local option ;tax,,
led that four"Councilmembersswill-go;to theSioux-City
the 20th wTt> was'_moved by =Brandt and seconded:by ,
the letter�be' received:' and` :filed`. Motion 'carried.
5. S . _..
is
4 V` ''
Cotuicil Minutes
Y
Page 6„f
ended by White.'to.adopt the
Az ,
It was moved:kby BrandtA, and ;sec
Resolution Public Heal
-.Setting
and Form 'of `Con't'ract for Octot
.Davidsen
Bonnett, explained.the reason'
on -:October <3' 1974, at ' 10 00 E
'Attorney: Hayek ;discussed the
Czarnecki, deProsse, White,vot
,ainst `Korshoj
carried: Cfy Engineer, Georgy
for having the project and _Cit
Lnd', seconded by White to adjourn
litigation find.counter=claim
m``..carried.MEN
-
It ;was mdeProsse
oved by
t:
Yo
the meeting at 9.25 P Moti
:M
x
t
_
S
t
L-
.-.City er
4.
y
t
+,
,
r
y
a
4
ti
1
I
t
Y -
Cotuicil Minutes
September
ended by White.'to.adopt the
rig and; -Specifications
"on;;Plans_°;
r;l, and Receive 'Bids
_1974;
M Upon roll call Brandt,
absent. Motion
.Davidsen
Bonnett, explained.the reason'
.
'Attorney: Hayek ;discussed the
,ainst `Korshoj
Lnd', seconded by White to adjourn
m``..carried.MEN
-
t:
Yo
j-_
L-
4.
y
t
+,
r
y
E
11
_ v �
. • _ - CIVIC CENTER, 410 E. WASHINGTON ST.
!^ IOWA CITY. IOWA 52240
319-354-/000
RAY S. WELLS. CITY MANAGER
MAYOR
EDGAR CiARNECKI
COUNCR.MEMRERs
C L '1Y." RRANDT
PENNY DAVIDSEN
CAROL dJROSSE
L PAIR" WMTE
P R O C L A M A T I O N
WHEREAS, the world is.confronted by a food crisis of an unprecedented
and long-term character which presents a moral as well as an
economic challenge to the United States; and
WHEREAS, the increasingly widespread shortage of food is aggravated by
rapidly escalating.prices for fertilizer, petroleum, and food
itself, which threaten to curtail what is available to hungry
people even further; and
WHEREAS, to attack world hunger immediately by stimulating public inter-
est in and action toward (a) sharply increasing food aid through
both private and public channels, (b) building up the U. S. com-
ponent of a`worldwide food reserve, and (c) insuring that the U. S.
delegation to the :World Food Conference in Rome advocates a policy
of sharing national `food resources with the hungry.
NOW THEREFORE, a.a Mayon ob .Iom.:C.ity, Iowa., I heheby pnocta.im Septembeh
22.11- '29, 1974., a.6 NATIONAL WEEK OF CONCERN FOR WORLD HUNGER in
.the. City ob:"Iowa City, and ulcge a t .c i tizene to take pnimany
kapon4zbiZi4;6on..keti. v,:ng.pneeent, and guarding aga,i.nat butune
ei
acahty, eien �o:the po.uu`" ob Z&i ting our own eacatating wand-
aadb o 6 `t i ving -
MEMBERS PRESENT- Phillip Jones
Mori Costantino
E. J. Means
Celia Roberts
Sally Smith
Jackie Finn
Paul Neuhauser
Richard Braverman
MEMBERS ABSENT: Elizabeth Diecke-
CITY STAFF PRESENT: Robert Bowlin
John Hayek
Kay Maune
RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE CITY COUNCIL:
That the appointment for the position of Human Relations Coordinator be made
by the present City Manager: as soon as possible.
SUMMARY OF DISCUSSION AND FORMAL ACTION TAKEN:
It was moved by Means and seconded by,Costantino that the minutes of the June 17,
1974, meeting be approved as submitted.
Jones and Maune reported on the status of the hiring procedure for the position
of Human Relations Coordinator. With 'therecent-resignation of Ray Wells, the
City Manager,` the.question arose as'to whether Wells should appoint a Human
Relations Coordinator before his departure from Iowa City. It was moved by Means
and seconded by Roberts that the Commission relay its position to both the City
Manager and the City Council that the appointment for the position of Human
Relations Coordinator be made by the present City Manager as soon as possible.
The Commission, through a sub -committee, had been working with Ray Wells in the
screening and selection process for -this position and the final candidates had
been recommended to the City Manager for selection.
City Attorney John Hayek was present at the Commission meeting to discuss inves-
tigative procedures in the case of a, complaint against the City of Iowa City.
Maune reported on research done'on other cities in the State of Iowa regarding
their procedures for complaints filed against the city government. Most other
commissions in the State of Iowa are not as active in the investigative process
as is the Iowa City Commission. Those cities that do have active commissions
(Des Moines, Council Bluffs, Sioux City and Davenport) reported the practice of
informally investigating the complaint._for informational purposes and then
referring the -complainant -to the Iowa Civil Rights Commission. Other cities such
as Waterloo and Cedar Rapids who have -invest . igative staff independent of the
rest of the city government handle complaints against other agencies of city
government themselves. Hayek once again reiterated his position of a conflict
of interest that would arise.if an Assistant City Attorney were required to
investigate a complaint against the City. The Commission discussed previous
comments about this issue including the possibility of a complainant contacting a
Commission member and a Commission member actually doing the investigation and
what problems arise then if conciliation can't be reached. (Neuhauser and
Braverman arrived at 8:00 P.M.) Means expressed concern that the complainant's
rights be protected. Jones summarized the discussion which took place at the
June meeting with the City Attorney and the City Manager and the Commission.
At that time they had indicated that Step 1 be that the complainant file both
with the Administrative Assistant and a Commission member present. Step 2, for
the investigation the soon to be appointed Human Relations Coordinator and/or
a Commission member could proceed with investigation of the complaint. Step 3
had not as yet been resolved. Jones indicated that he and Maune would draft a
procedure for the next Commission meeting, taking into account the concerns
expressed at the meeting that.(l) the.Legal-Department should not be involved,
(2) addressing the question of when the situation becomes adversary and (3)
taking as given that there is a potential conflict of interest which could
jeopardize the complainant's case.
Chairperson Jones appointed Paul Neuhauser to the Human Relations Committee of
the Board of Education. It was moved by Neuhauser and seconded by Costantino
to adjourn to executive session to discuss complaints of discrimination and
cases under conciliation. On a roll call vote all members present voted yes.
MEMBERS ABSENT:
Margaret Keyes, William Nusser, Brian Gutheinz, Lloyd Berger, Laurence
Lafore.
STAFF PRESENT:
Jack Klaus, Rodney R. Parsons, Pat Wilson
GUESTS:
Dick Summerwill
RECOMMENDATIONS TO CITY COUNCIL:
0 None
REQUESTS TO THE CITY MANAGER FOR INFORMATION OR STAFF ASSISTANCE:
Mike Williams of Welton Becket requested that the Committee request from
the Manager and staff the information which Williams has requested approx-
imately two months ago. Committee agreed to do so.
LIST OF MATTERS PENDING COMMISSION -COUNCIL DISPOSITION:
1. Commission's recommendation to Council regarding the sculpture
pla%:ement within or without the Project Area.
2. Final recommendation on design objectives.
SUMMARY OF DISCUSSION AND FORMAL ACTIONS TAKEN:
Tom Wegman opened the meeting by reporting on the Council's reaction to
the proposed design objectives and the objectives of the Design Review
Committee itself. Jack Klaus responded that John Hayek's reaction to
having the Design Review Committee react to any design objectives out-
side of the Project Area was rather negative.
v
Design Review..Committee
August 26, 1974
Page 2
Dick Summerwill then reported on the sculpture selection with Jack
Klaus giving some of the background as well as Mr. Summerwill. Dick
stated that the artists had been selected and the only problem remain-
ing was the site work at the locations selected as being the most
ideal for placement of the sculptures. The location for the small
sculpture was at the intersection of College and Dubuque. The major
sculpture was to be located in Chauncey Swan Plaza in the Project
GREEN area as well as in part of the area now occupied by parking
meters. Removal of these meters as well as the limited space and
removal of the utility wires which were felt would compete with the
sculpture. The cost of accomplishing these things might be prohibitive
to the use of this site.
Discussion and opinions were offered by the DRC, Mr. Summerwill and Mr.
Williams and the disadvantages and advantages, particularly of the site
of the large sculpture, were discussed. Ms. Seiberling suggested that
the sites were not final and perhaps they should be reevaluated. Mr.
Summerwill stated that the committee of judges had decided that the
Chauncey Swan site would be the best possible site for the large sculpture
assuming that the changes could be made.
The meeting was then turned over to Mr.
® plained the interim design concept. Ms.
Joe Mather of the Bikeways Committee be
paths through the Project Area.
Williams who presented and ex-
Seiberling suggested that Mr.
consulted with regard to bicycle
There was some concern ab.oit the drainage in the Project Area and
whether it would be adequately accomplished by the open aqueducts.
Mr. Williams stated that at this time there was a lack of green areas.
He stated that greening was the least expensive improvement and there-
fore would always be available.
Bill Nowysz suggested that perhaps the small sculpture could be placed
at the intersection of College and Clinton so that it would jut out in-
to the intersection and thus be visible from both ends of Clinton Street.
He also suggested that the large sculpture be suspended over the inter-
section of College -,and -Dubuque Street.
Mr. Williams asked the DRC to be concerned about -he following items
and make suggestions at the next meeting.
1. Maintenance of public toilets to avoid vandalism; 2. the minimum
width.of the pedestrian lane next to building; 3. how much area needed
for turning of fi.re trucks and emergency vehicles (this question was to
be answered by City staff); 4_. the bike lane problem; S. whether or
not the bus waiting areas on th- corner of Clinton would interrupt the
view of Old Capitol.
The next meeting was set -..for September 3 at 10:00 p.m.
■
The Honorable Mayor and City Council Members:
Civic Center
Iowa City
Dear Mayor and Council. Members:
Mr. John Kennedy, owner and operator
of Capitol Implement Co., and I, B. W. Sheridan,
owner of the'Aero Rental property are interested in
the purchase of a small parcel of vacated ground in
Lyon's First Addition in Iowa. City.
This, ground is the west. half of an alley,
which was vacated in 1964 (Vacation #2299). It is
located near the intersection of Lafayette Street and
Maiden Lane.
We respectfully request that the council
begin the proceedings necessary to accomplish this
transaction,'. as provided in the city ordinances.
(R' exp ctfull �y urs,
'
At
102 Potomac Drive
r � L E 0
SEP 9,1971E
,Ei8IF STQLFL'ZE')
OTY CLERK
September
7, 1974
1
t
The Honorable Mayor and City Council Members:
Civic Center
Iowa City
Dear Mayor and Council. Members:
Mr. John Kennedy, owner and operator
of Capitol Implement Co., and I, B. W. Sheridan,
owner of the'Aero Rental property are interested in
the purchase of a small parcel of vacated ground in
Lyon's First Addition in Iowa. City.
This, ground is the west. half of an alley,
which was vacated in 1964 (Vacation #2299). It is
located near the intersection of Lafayette Street and
Maiden Lane.
We respectfully request that the council
begin the proceedings necessary to accomplish this
transaction,'. as provided in the city ordinances.
(R' exp ctfull �y urs,
'
At
102 Potomac Drive
r � L E 0
SEP 9,1971E
,Ei8IF STQLFL'ZE')
OTY CLERK
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
CITY -UNIVERSITY PROJECT, IOWA R-14 DEMOLITION
AND SITE CLEARANCE CONTRACT #4
Public Notice is -hereby given that a public hearing will be held
by the City Councilon Sept. 17 , 1974 at 7:30 P M.
e D T, in the Council Chambers of the City Hall, on a proposed Resolution
of Necessity for the construction of
City -University Projett, Iowa R-14 Demolition and
Site Clearance Contract N4
within the City of Iowa City, Iowa.
At said time and place, last above mentioned, any interested persons
may appear and file objections thereto. Dated this 31st day of August
19 74.
Abbie,Stolfus, City C erk
Publish once - August 31, 1974
■
RESOLUTION NO. 74-404'
RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY
CITY-UNIVERSITY'-PROJ.`IOWA R-14 DEMOLITION & SITE
CLEARANCE CONTRACT #4
WHEREAS, plans, specifications and form of contract and an estimate of
the total cost of the following public improvement;
City -University Project Iowa R=14 Demolition & Site
Clearance Contract #4
are now on file in the Office of the City Clerk, and
WHEREAS, notice of this Resolution of Necessity was duly published as
required by law, and
WHEREAS, the following objections have been filed to said Resolution of
Necessity,
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCI. OF THE CITY OF IOWA CITY,
IOWA:
1) That it is deemed advisable and necessary to construct certain street
improvements, hereinafter described on the following streets, avenues and alleys,
or portions thereof, within the City of Iowa City, Iowa, to—gait:
2) The type of improvement will be as above set out.
3) The method:of'construction will be by contract.
4) The cost of the improvement shall be paid for by
iS
l
RESOLUTION NO. 74-404'
RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY
CITY-UNIVERSITY'-PROJ.`IOWA R-14 DEMOLITION & SITE
CLEARANCE CONTRACT #4
WHEREAS, plans, specifications and form of contract and an estimate of
the total cost of the following public improvement;
City -University Project Iowa R=14 Demolition & Site
Clearance Contract #4
are now on file in the Office of the City Clerk, and
WHEREAS, notice of this Resolution of Necessity was duly published as
required by law, and
WHEREAS, the following objections have been filed to said Resolution of
Necessity,
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCI. OF THE CITY OF IOWA CITY,
IOWA:
1) That it is deemed advisable and necessary to construct certain street
improvements, hereinafter described on the following streets, avenues and alleys,
or portions thereof, within the City of Iowa City, Iowa, to—gait:
2) The type of improvement will be as above set out.
3) The method:of'construction will be by contract.
4) The cost of the improvement shall be paid for by
RESOLUTION NO.-, 74-404
It was moved by White and seconded by Brandt
Resolution as read be adopted, and.upon roll call there were:
AYES: NAYS: ABSENT:
x
Brandt
x
Czarnecki
X
Davidsen
X
deProsse
X
White
Passed and approved this 17th day of September , 1974
ATTEST:
that the
W.
t10T1CC OF PUSL:IC HtARIhu,Gu
PLAN'S AND,.SPEC IFI CAT] ONS ' AND FORM
OF CONTPJ+CT FOR CO1%g7RACT NO. FOUR
D EMOL I T I OId AND SITE CLEARANCE
CITY UNIVERSITY PROJECT, IOWA R-14,
m'
THE CITY OF 10WA CITY, IO'aA
TO ALL TAXPAYERS OF THE CITY OF IOWA CITY, 1010A,'AND TO OWI EP. PERSONS I N ITERESTED c
Public Notice is hereby given that the Council of :the Municipality of Iowa
City, Iowa will conduct a public hearing on plans, specifications and form of
contract for Contract No. Four Demolition and .Site Clearance, City University
Projeci, lora R-14 in said municipality at 7:30 P.M. on the 17th d y of
September 19 74 , said meeting to be held in the Counc.ii 'Ihambers in the
Civic Center in said Municipality.
Said plans, specifications and form of contract are noo-: on file in the
office of the City Clerk, Civic Center in lona City, loxia, and may be inspected
by any persons interested.
Any persons interested may appear at said matting of the Council for the
purpose of raking objections to said plans., specifications or contract or the
cost of making said improvements.
This Notice is given by order of City Council of the mwn i c i pa l i ty of l a:ra
City, Iowa.
:ity Clerk of loth Ci.!.y, lot•:a
L
Abbie Stolfus
I
RESOLUTION APPROVINQ PU,,NS SPECIFICATIONS r
AND FORM.OF CONTRACT FOR DEMOLITION & SITE
CLEARANCE CITY -UNIVERSITY PROJECT IOWA R-14
CONTRACT # 4
WHEREAS, on the 27th day of August 1 1974 plans, specifications
and form of contract were filed with the City Clerk of Iowa City, Iowa, for the construc-
tion Demolition & Site Clearance
Contract
within the City of Iowa City, Iowa; and
University Proj. Iowa R-14
WHEREAS, notice of hearing on plans, specifications and form of contract was
published as required by law,:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF IOWA CITY, IOWA:
That the said plans, specifications and form of contract are hereby approved as
the plans, specifications and form of contract for said __Iemol;t;on & Site
Clearance City -University Proi_ Tnwn R -1A r„rtr AL
It was moved by and seconded by Rrand that the
resolution as read be adopted, and upon roll call there were:
AYES: NAYES: ABSENT:
Brandt x
Czarnecki x
Davidsen X
deProsse X
White X
Passed and approved this 17th - day of S
ATTEST:
t.
1974
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
Public Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held
by the City Council on Sept. 17 1974 at 7;30 P M.
(2f)T, in the Council Chambers of the City Hall, on a proposed Resolution
of Necessity for the construction of
Lower Park Road Project
within the City of Iowa City, Iowa.
At said time and .place, last above mentioned, any interested persons
may appear and file objections thereto. Dated this 31st day of August
19 74 .
Publish once August 31, 1974
i
Abbie Stolfus, City CXerk
r
L!
1.
A l G
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
Public Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held
by the City Council on Sept. 17 1974 at 7;30 P M.
(2f)T, in the Council Chambers of the City Hall, on a proposed Resolution
of Necessity for the construction of
Lower Park Road Project
within the City of Iowa City, Iowa.
At said time and .place, last above mentioned, any interested persons
may appear and file objections thereto. Dated this 31st day of August
19 74 .
Publish once August 31, 1974
i
Abbie Stolfus, City CXerk
WHEREAS, plans, specifications and form of contract and an estimate of
the total cost of the following public improvement;
Lower Park Road Project
are n(ri on file in the Office of the City Clerk, and
WHi'REAS, notice of this Resolution of Necessity was duly published as
required by law, and
WHEREAS, the following objections have been filed to said Resolution of
Necessity,
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF IOWA CITY,
IOWA:
1) That it is deemed advisable and necessary to construct certain street
improvements, hereinafter described on`the.following streets, avenues and alleys,
or portions thereof, within the City of Iowa City, Iowa, to -wit:
2) The type of improvement will be as, above set out.
3) The method of construction will be by contract.
4) The cost of the improvement shall be paid for by
1
4
L
RESOLUTION NO. 74-406'
It was moved by Davidsen and seconded by deProsse
Resolution as read be adopted, and upon roll call there were:
AYES: NAYS: ABSENT:
X Brandt
X Czarnecki*
X Davidsen
X deProsse
X White .
Passed and approved this 17t day of September
Mayor
ATTEST: ,fid�z J' f'. -1',e-)
City Cle
19 74
that the
FOR`CONSTRUCTION OF'LOWEIR PARK ROAD
TO ALL TAXPAYERS OF THE CITY OF IOWA CITY, IOWA, AND TO OTHER PERSONS INTERESTED:
Public Notice is hereby given that the Council of the Municipality of Iowa
City, Iowa will conduct a public hearing on plans, specifications and form of
contract for the construction.of Lower Park Road and work incidental thereto,
in said municipality at 7:30 P.M. on. the 17th day of September, 1974, said
meeting to be held in the Council Chambers in the Civic Center is said
municipality.
Said plans, specifications and form of contract are now on file in the office
of the City Clerk, Civic Center in Iowa City, Iowa, and may be inspected by
any persons interested.
Any persons interested may appear at said meeting of the Council for the
purpose of making objections to said plans, specifications or contract or the
cost of making said improvements.
This notice is given by order of City Council of the Municipality of Iowa City,
Iowa.
City Clerk of
Abbie Stolfus
Publish once, August 31, 1974.
J .Z' .0 _
Iowa ty, Iowa
NOTICE OF,PUBLIC HEARING
ON PLANS
�AND`SPECIFICATIONS"AND FORM OFrCONTRACT
FOR`CONSTRUCTION OF'LOWEIR PARK ROAD
TO ALL TAXPAYERS OF THE CITY OF IOWA CITY, IOWA, AND TO OTHER PERSONS INTERESTED:
Public Notice is hereby given that the Council of the Municipality of Iowa
City, Iowa will conduct a public hearing on plans, specifications and form of
contract for the construction.of Lower Park Road and work incidental thereto,
in said municipality at 7:30 P.M. on. the 17th day of September, 1974, said
meeting to be held in the Council Chambers in the Civic Center is said
municipality.
Said plans, specifications and form of contract are now on file in the office
of the City Clerk, Civic Center in Iowa City, Iowa, and may be inspected by
any persons interested.
Any persons interested may appear at said meeting of the Council for the
purpose of making objections to said plans, specifications or contract or the
cost of making said improvements.
This notice is given by order of City Council of the Municipality of Iowa City,
Iowa.
City Clerk of
Abbie Stolfus
Publish once, August 31, 1974.
J .Z' .0 _
Iowa ty, Iowa
t
WHEREAS, on the 27th day of August 1974 plans, specifications
and form of contract were filed with the City Clerk of Iowa City, Iowa, for the construc-
tion Lower Park Road Project
within the City of Iowa City, Iowa; and
WHEREAS, notice of hearing on plans,
published as required by law:
specifications and form of contract was
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF IOWA CITY, IOWA:
That the said plans, specifications and form of contract are hereby approved as
the plans, specifications and 'form:of'contract for said
Lower Park Road Project
It vAa moved by _ a=PrnccP
and
seconded by Davidsen
that the
resolution as read be adopted,
and upon
roll call there
were:
Brandt
Czarnecki
Davidsen
deProsse
White
AYES: NAYES: ABSENT:
x
x -
x
Passed and approved this 17th day'of September
ATTEST:
City_,Clerkf
19 74
.ii
1
NOTICE SOF
AMENDING
THE MUNIC
t3L1C, riC�AK1LVC; I
PTER 4.21 OF
L CODE
Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the,City
Council of Iowa City, Iowa at 7:30 R.M. on the 17th day of September, 1974,
in the Council Chambers in the Civic Center, Iowa City, Iowa. At which
hearing the Council will consider arguments for and against the proposed
adoption of amendments to Chapter 4.21 of the Municipal Code of the City
of Iowa City, Iowa, which would provide and allow for the enforcement of
provisions of said Chapter by 'prohibiting interference with an agent
authorized to enforce those provisions concerning Pet Animals.
Copies of the proposed amendment are on file for public examination
in the office of the City Clerk, Civic Center, Iowa City, Iowa,'
Dated at Iowa City this 31st day of August, 1974.
Abbie Stolfus, 6
City Clerk of Iowa City, Iowa
o -
7
t3L1C, riC�AK1LVC; I
PTER 4.21 OF
L CODE
Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the,City
Council of Iowa City, Iowa at 7:30 R.M. on the 17th day of September, 1974,
in the Council Chambers in the Civic Center, Iowa City, Iowa. At which
hearing the Council will consider arguments for and against the proposed
adoption of amendments to Chapter 4.21 of the Municipal Code of the City
of Iowa City, Iowa, which would provide and allow for the enforcement of
provisions of said Chapter by 'prohibiting interference with an agent
authorized to enforce those provisions concerning Pet Animals.
Copies of the proposed amendment are on file for public examination
in the office of the City Clerk, Civic Center, Iowa City, Iowa,'
Dated at Iowa City this 31st day of August, 1974.
Abbie Stolfus, 6
City Clerk of Iowa City, Iowa
Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the City Council
of Iowa City, Iowa at 7:30 P.M. on the 1-711t day of 1974, in the
Council Chambers in the Civic Center, Iowa City, Iowa. At which hearing the
Council will consider arguments for and against the proposed adoption of amend-
ments to the Zoning Code with regard to the establishment of the Commercial
Office Zone.
Copies of the proposed Ordinance Amendment are on file for public examination
in the office of the City Clerk, Civic Center, Iowa City, Iowa.
This notice given pursuant to Section 414.4 Code of Iowa 1973. Dated at
Iowa City, this Si day of v n, s �� 1974.
Publish twice, A, 6-ta
City Clerk
4
V 'P -t
VI
1974.
CHAPTER 8.10
ZONING ORDINANCE
Sections: (adding thereto)
8.10.11.1 CO Zone Use Regulations
8.10.4 DISTRICTS.AND BOUNDARIES THEREOF
A. (adding thereto)
CO - Commercial -Office Zone
8.10.6 VALLEY CHANNEL AND VALLEY PLAIN ZONE USE
REGULATIONS
D.2. (adding thereto)
(p) VP(CO);the uses as regulated by 8.10.11.1
8.10.11.1 CO ZONE.USE REGULATIONS
used for the follaw:
1. Office builc
on catering
ana no stocf
customers, e
)ffice Zone shall be
u purpcses on -Ly:
n s in.which no activi
o ,retail trade with tai
of Goods is maintained
as
A
is carried
eneral, vii
sale to
OfTiEce
uses permittee -shall -include the following:
(a) Professional services.
(b) 'Finance, insurance-: and real estate services,
excluding rave -in facilities.
(c) Central or administrative offices.
(d) Business and management consu tang services.
(e) Consumer and mercantile cre lt rPnnrtincy
services; ad ustment and collection services.
{f)Employment.services
(g) Research and -testing -services.
(h) Welfare and .charitable oervlces.
(i) Detective and protective services.
2.Religious activities.:
3. Drug store, limited to the sale of drugs and
pharmaceutical products.
4. Corrective optical and prosthetics supply store.
8.10.19 ADDITIONAL REGULATIONS
II. The special uses, the conditions that must be
observed, and zones in which such uses will be
allowed are
4
c
}
•
t
A
PROPOSED`ORDINANCE CREATING A
CO - (COMMERCIAL
OFFICE)
ZONE
CHAPTER 8.10
ZONING ORDINANCE
Sections: (adding thereto)
8.10.11.1 CO Zone Use Regulations
8.10.4 DISTRICTS.AND BOUNDARIES THEREOF
A. (adding thereto)
CO - Commercial -Office Zone
8.10.6 VALLEY CHANNEL AND VALLEY PLAIN ZONE USE
REGULATIONS
D.2. (adding thereto)
(p) VP(CO);the uses as regulated by 8.10.11.1
8.10.11.1 CO ZONE.USE REGULATIONS
used for the follaw:
1. Office builc
on catering
ana no stocf
customers, e
)ffice Zone shall be
u purpcses on -Ly:
n s in.which no activi
o ,retail trade with tai
of Goods is maintained
as
A
is carried
eneral, vii
sale to
OfTiEce
uses permittee -shall -include the following:
(a) Professional services.
(b) 'Finance, insurance-: and real estate services,
excluding rave -in facilities.
(c) Central or administrative offices.
(d) Business and management consu tang services.
(e) Consumer and mercantile cre lt rPnnrtincy
services; ad ustment and collection services.
{f)Employment.services
(g) Research and -testing -services.
(h) Welfare and .charitable oervlces.
(i) Detective and protective services.
2.Religious activities.:
3. Drug store, limited to the sale of drugs and
pharmaceutical products.
4. Corrective optical and prosthetics supply store.
8.10.19 ADDITIONAL REGULATIONS
II. The special uses, the conditions that must be
observed, and zones in which such uses will be
allowed are
4
c
USE SPECIFIC CONDITIONS ZONES
Commercial Shall not be located Any
greenhouses and closer than 25 feet from except
nurseries an 'R' Zone property line R, CO, ORP
Commercial NONE C
recreational except
activities CO
Trailer camps 1. All inhabited trailers C
in the City shall be loca- except CO
ted in 'a trailer camp.
2. Trailer camps shall pro-
vide 3000 square feet of land
area for each trailer.
3. At least 20 feet shall be
maintained between trailers.
4. All trailers must front on
a paved road having not less
than 12 feet of clear, unob-
structed roadway at all times.
8.10.22 HEIGHT REGULATIONS
A.1. In R1A, R1B, R2, .CO and CH Zones, said buildings
shall not exceed two and one-half (2h) stories and
shall not exceed thirty-five (35) feet; except that
a building on a lot in the CO or CH Zone within
45 feet,of the side lot line of a lot with an
existing residential building in an R Zone shall
not exceed the height .of>said residential building.
8.10.23 YARD REGULATIONS
A. (adding thereto)
ONE FRONT YARD TWO SIDE YARDS ONE REAR YARD
HAVING A DEPTH HAVING A WIDTH HAVING A DEPTH
ZONE OF OF OF
CO 25 feet None None
8.10.24 AREA REGULATIONS
A. (adding thereto)
FRONTAGE WIDTH AREA IN
ZONE IN FEET IN FEET SQ. FT.
CO None None None
8.10.25 OFF-STREET PARKING SPACE REQUIREMENTS
A.16. For all uses except those above specified when
located in the R. C1 aiid CH Zones, one space for
each one hundred (100) square feet of floor area;
when located in the C2 Zone, one (1) space for each
three hundred (300) square feet of floor area, and
when located in the CO Zone, one (1) space for each
two hundred (200) square feet of floor area.
8.10.26 PERMITTED ACCESSORY USES
A.3. In the Cl. CO, CH and C2 Zones there may also be
a use of not to exceed forty (40) percent of the
floor area for incidental storage.
CHAPTER 8.12
SIGN STANDARDS
Sections:
8.12.7 Cl and CO Zone Regulations
8.12.7 Cl AND CO ZONE REGULATIONS
B.3. iia sign not to exceed sixty-five (65) percent
of the maximum square footage allowed for facia signs
in Cl or CO Zones shall be permitted in those
instances where:a commercial business or office
shall have frontage Ion two intersecting streets.
i
8.10.25 OFF-STREET PARKING SPACE REQUIREMENTS
A.16. For all uses except those above specified when
located in the R. C1 aiid CH Zones, one space for
each one hundred (100) square feet of floor area;
when located in the C2 Zone, one (1) space for each
three hundred (300) square feet of floor area, and
when located in the CO Zone, one (1) space for each
two hundred (200) square feet of floor area.
8.10.26 PERMITTED ACCESSORY USES
A.3. In the Cl. CO, CH and C2 Zones there may also be
a use of not to exceed forty (40) percent of the
floor area for incidental storage.
CHAPTER 8.12
SIGN STANDARDS
Sections:
8.12.7 Cl and CO Zone Regulations
8.12.7 Cl AND CO ZONE REGULATIONS
B.3. iia sign not to exceed sixty-five (65) percent
of the maximum square footage allowed for facia signs
in Cl or CO Zones shall be permitted in those
instances where:a commercial business or office
shall have frontage Ion two intersecting streets.
x r
or
ORDINANCE NO_ 74-2733
AN ORDINANCE VACATING A PORTION OF FIRST AVENUE.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF IOWA CITY, IGWA:
Section l.. That the street in Iowa City, Iowa, hereinafter
described be and the same is hereby vacated:
That portion of the vacated First Avenue which lies Southwesterly
of the C.R.I. & P. R.R. in Iowa City, Iowa, more fully described as follows:
Beginning at the Northernmost comer of Lot 7 in• a Resubdivision
of Part of Lot 4 of Ohl's Subdivision,. Iowa City, Iowa; said corner being
the intersection of the Southerly R.O.N. line of the C.R.I. & P. R.R. and
the Southerly R.O.W. line of First Avenue; thence S 680 39' IV, 165,8 feet
along the Southerly R.O.N. line of First Avenue; thence Northwesterly along
a curve concave Southerly with a radius of 125 feet for a distance of 128.04
feet; thence N 21° 21' N, 2.50 feet; thence N 68" 39' E, 60,52 feet; thence
Northeasterly along a curve concave Northerly with a radius of 545.8fe?t
for a distance of 139.53 feet; thence S 610 54' E, 109.20 feet along the
Southerly R.O.N. line of the C..R.I. P. R.R. to the point of beginning.
AND,
With earn. easement 20 feet in width for sa•n_i tart' sewer across
vacated First Avenue which is 10 fees either side of the
following described centerline:
Beginning at a point on the southerly line of vacated First
Avenue, which point is S. 680 39' S9, 140.50 r
�<eet from the northerly
corner of Lot 7 in a Resubdivision of part of Lot 4, Ohl's Sub-
division, Iowa City, Iowa; thence N 2101
21 I7, 81.00 feet,
or less to the northerly line of vacated First Avenue, Wore
ANDY
With an easement for sidewalk right-of-way described as follows:
orner, o c tion, .l4 , .Township
79 'North', Range `6 ..West; in Johnson County,:; Iowa; thence North
along the East "'line fof said= Seco ons°1 a distance `of' eight' hundred'`
forty --three and;'five tenths-. (843:5) feet to a right of way corner
of the Chicago, Rock,;Island:and_Pacific Railroad Company; thence
Northwesterly at an angle of sixty-two (62) degrees and thirty-
eight (38) minutes to the.left and along the southerly right of
way line of said Railroad Company two hundred forty and six tenths
(240.6) feet to the true point of beginning of the parcel of land
herein described; thence continuing Northwesterly on last described
course along said Southerly right of way line eighty and nine tenths
(80.9) feet; thence Northeasterly along a curve to the left having
a radius of six hundred seventy-eight and eighty-four one hundredths
(678.84) feet a -distance of one hundred eleven and five -tenths
(111.5) feet to the northerly right of way line of said Railroad
Company; thence Southeasterly along said northerly right of way
line seventy-seven and two tenths (77.2) feet; thence southwesterly
along a curve to the right having a radius of seven -hundred fifty-
three and eight -four one hundredths (753.84) fest a distance of one
hundred four and five tenths (104.5) feet to point of beginning;
excepting therefrom the Northwesterly ten (10) feet of equal width,
Section 2. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect when
published by lata.
It was moved by Davidsen and seconded by deProsse that the
Ordinance be adopted, and upon roll call there were:
Brandt
Czarnecki
Davidsen
deProsse
White
AYES: MAYS:
X
X
X
X
X.
ABSENT:
Passed and approved this 17th day of September 1974
23ay or
ATTEST:
City Cler
Z.
ORDINANCE,NO =
2733<
Commencing
t e
Southeast`s" f
orner, o c tion, .l4 , .Township
79 'North', Range `6 ..West; in Johnson County,:; Iowa; thence North
along the East "'line fof said= Seco ons°1 a distance `of' eight' hundred'`
forty --three and;'five tenths-. (843:5) feet to a right of way corner
of the Chicago, Rock,;Island:and_Pacific Railroad Company; thence
Northwesterly at an angle of sixty-two (62) degrees and thirty-
eight (38) minutes to the.left and along the southerly right of
way line of said Railroad Company two hundred forty and six tenths
(240.6) feet to the true point of beginning of the parcel of land
herein described; thence continuing Northwesterly on last described
course along said Southerly right of way line eighty and nine tenths
(80.9) feet; thence Northeasterly along a curve to the left having
a radius of six hundred seventy-eight and eighty-four one hundredths
(678.84) feet a -distance of one hundred eleven and five -tenths
(111.5) feet to the northerly right of way line of said Railroad
Company; thence Southeasterly along said northerly right of way
line seventy-seven and two tenths (77.2) feet; thence southwesterly
along a curve to the right having a radius of seven -hundred fifty-
three and eight -four one hundredths (753.84) fest a distance of one
hundred four and five tenths (104.5) feet to point of beginning;
excepting therefrom the Northwesterly ten (10) feet of equal width,
Section 2. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect when
published by lata.
It was moved by Davidsen and seconded by deProsse that the
Ordinance be adopted, and upon roll call there were:
Brandt
Czarnecki
Davidsen
deProsse
White
AYES: MAYS:
X
X
X
X
X.
ABSENT:
Passed and approved this 17th day of September 1974
23ay or
ATTEST:
City Cler
BE IT ENACTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF IOWA
CITY, IOWA.
SECTION I. PURPOSE. The purpose of this Ordinance is to
establish a height limitation for buildings in the "R3" Zone.
SECTION II. AMENDMENT. The Zoning Code of the City of
Iowa City, Iowa, is hereby amended by the following:
8.10.22.A.1. In RIA, R1B, R2, R3 and CH Zones, said
buildings shall not exceed two and one-half (2�)
stories and shall not exceed thirty-five (35)
feet.
SECTION III. REPEALER. All other Ordinances or parts of
Ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance
are hereby repealed, as is section 8.10.22.A.1. of the Zoning
Code of Iowa City, Iowa.
SECTION IV. SAVINGS CLAUSE. If any section, provision,
or part of this Ordinance shall be adjudged invalid or unconstitu-
tional, such adjudication shall not affect the validity of the
Ordinance as a whole or any section, provision, or part thereof
not adjudged invalid or unconstitutional.
SECTION V. EFFECTIVE DATE.This Ord;.nance shall become
effective after its final passage, approval and publication as
provided by law.
It was moved by deProsse and seconded by
White that the Ordinance as read be adopted, and
upon roll call there were:
AYES: NAYS: ABSENT:
X Brandt
X Czarnecki
X Davidsen
X deProsse
X White
ATTEST:�j
CITY CLERK
3rd Reading 9-17-74 T.O.
Passed and approved this 17th day ofSP t� archer ' 194—'
Date published:
C
Ordinance
No.
74-271d
{ Page
2
_
1st
Reading
q-.3- i 4
%-K, ,
2nd
Reading
4-1d
- -74
% 0
3rd Reading 9-17-74 T.O.
Passed and approved this 17th day ofSP t� archer ' 194—'
Date published:
C
ORDINANCE NO. u-97 -1 sA
AN ORDINANCE VACATING AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC
HIGHWAY PURPOSES ALONG WOOLF AVENUE
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF IOWA CITY, IOWA:
Section 1. That the easement in Iowa City, Iowa, here-
inafter described be and the same is hereby vacated:
Commencing at a U.S. boundary marker, which marker
is 37.8 feet south of the center line of U.S.
Highway. No. 6 and 25 feet east of the center line
of Woolf Avenue, which marker is also the north-
west corner of the Veterans Administration Hosp-
ital lands, thence along the westerly boundary
of the hospital lands S- 01006'51" West a distance
of 424.8 feet to a concrete U.S. boundary marker
and the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, thence S 38045'29"
West 117.39 feet; thence S 37035'23" East 114.66
feet; thence N 01006'51" East 182.43 feet to said
true point of beginning.
Section 2. This Ordinance shall be in full force and
effect when published by law.
It was moved by Brandt
Davidsen that the Ordinance be
roll call there were:
AYES: NAYS: ABSENT:
X
and seconded by
adopted, and upon
Brandt
Czarnecki
Davidsen
deProsse
White
Passed and approved this 17th day of September
ATTEST:
City Clerk
1974.
First Reading 7 �-/V %U
Second Reading
Third Reading 4- 1, -
1
TO: Abbie Stolfus, City Clerk
FROM: John Hayek
NIL Y
ANDUM!
DATE: January 13, 1975
RE: Vacation of Woolf Avenue and VA Hospital
Dear Abbie:
If you will recall, we passed an ordinance sometime ago which
has not yet been published vacating a portion of Woolf Avenue. The
publication was held up pending obtaining a written agreement from
Veterans Administration concerning the vacation. I have now secured
the necessary signatures from the VA officials on the agreement.
The original copy of the agreement is attached. Please have it
signed by yourself and the Mayor and return a certified copy for me so
that I may send it back to Fred Brown for his files as he requests.
You may go ahead and have the vacation ordinance published in
order to make it effective.
John Hayek
JWI-I:vb:VA Hospital
Enclosure
cc: Mr. Dannis Kraft
TO: John Hayek
FROM: Abb i e
RE: Vacation of Woolf Avenue
DATE:
January 15, 1975
Attached, please find a certified copy of the Memorandum
of Agreement concerning the above vacation of Woolf
Avenue, which you requested for Fred Borwn.
We have processed the Ordinance and it will be published
by next week. Besides recording the Ordinance, I have
had the agreement recorded.
Yours very truly,
R7
1
i� .{ z "+. T"�-ao +^Fj'1 t � f if h >r ^9 biC � � f+
_ T 4- i i _ u4g 3�;i,
f 't k r ..,+. t � �., k : i -rtk r,x t � � �� < n .'.w'i" _ �` Y
'-" f -� t � � ', It 't cr �1 �r 1 ,a '.r _i �..LirFw �i3M1��.
T 6
- .. F' n1 � i i}I is i_. _ � ,'1-.�,c�` }iv +rte''
�.�'�'.
F
E
RESOLUTION NO.
;74-408
a
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING TRIPARTITE AGREEMENT AMONG THE CITY OF
IOWA CITY, IOWA, THE CITY OF LAKEWOOD, COLORADO, AND THE INTER-
NATIONAL CITY MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION RETIREMENT CORPORATION,
FOR THE TRANSFEROFTHE OWNERSHIP, CONTROL AND RIGHT OF WITHDRAWAL
OF FUNDS FROM THE CITY OF IOWA CITY, IOWA, TO THE CITY OF LAKEWOOD,
COLORADO.
WHEREAS, on December 21, 1973, the City Council of Iowa City, Iowa
adopted Resolution No. 73-547 which authorized and instructed the Mayor and
the City Clerk of the City of Iowa City, Iowa, to execute on behalf of the
City of Iowa City, Iowa, a deferred compensation agreement between the City
of Iowa City, Iowa, and Ray S. Wells, the City Manager, and also to execute
on behalf of the City of Iowa City, Iowa, a trust agreement with the Interna-
tional City Management Association Retirement Corporation as Trustee, and
WHEREAS, the City of Iowa City, Iowa, has deposited funds with the Inter-
national City Management Association Retirement Corporation as Trustee under the
aforesaid trust agreement, and according to the aforesaid deferred compensation
agreement, and
WHEREAS, Ray S.. Wells has accepted employment with the City of Lakewood,
Colorado, and has resigned his position -as City Manager of the City of Iowa City,
Iowa, effective September 20, 1974, and
IsWHEREAS, the City of Iowa City, Iowa, has no present or future interest in
the funds so far deposited with the Trustee, and desires to avoid further continuing
expense in maintaining the records of the aforesaid deferred compensation agreement
between the City of Iowa City, Iowa, and Ray S. Wells, and finally
WHEREAS, the International City Management Association Retirement Corporation
has established a Tripartite Agreement Procedure for the transfer of the ownership,
control and right of withdrawal of funds deposited by one City to the account of
another city.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF IOWA CITY,
Iowa,
That the Mayor and the City Clerk of the City of Iowa City, Iowa,
are hereby authorized and instructed to execute on behalf of the City of
Iowa City, Iowa, a Tripartite Agreement among the City of Iowa City, Iowa,
the City of Lakewood, Colorado, and the International City Management
Association Retirement Corporation as Trustee for the transfer of funds,
assets and accumulations from the ownership, control and right of with-
drawal of the City of Iowa City, Iowa, to the ownership, control and right
of withdrawal of the City of Lakewood, Colorado, effective September 20,
1974.
It was moved by dPp,,,GGP and seconded by
that the REsolution as read be adopted, and
upon roll call there were:
AYES: NAYS: ABSENT:
X— Czarnecki
X— Brandt
_X Davidsen
X_ deProsse
X_ White
Passed and approved this 17th day of September, 1974.
ATTEST
City Clerk
�O
RESOLUTION NO.
;74-408
a
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING TRIPARTITE AGREEMENT AMONG THE CITY OF
IOWA CITY, IOWA, THE CITY OF LAKEWOOD, COLORADO, AND THE INTER-
NATIONAL CITY MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION RETIREMENT CORPORATION,
FOR THE TRANSFEROFTHE OWNERSHIP, CONTROL AND RIGHT OF WITHDRAWAL
OF FUNDS FROM THE CITY OF IOWA CITY, IOWA, TO THE CITY OF LAKEWOOD,
COLORADO.
WHEREAS, on December 21, 1973, the City Council of Iowa City, Iowa
adopted Resolution No. 73-547 which authorized and instructed the Mayor and
the City Clerk of the City of Iowa City, Iowa, to execute on behalf of the
City of Iowa City, Iowa, a deferred compensation agreement between the City
of Iowa City, Iowa, and Ray S. Wells, the City Manager, and also to execute
on behalf of the City of Iowa City, Iowa, a trust agreement with the Interna-
tional City Management Association Retirement Corporation as Trustee, and
WHEREAS, the City of Iowa City, Iowa, has deposited funds with the Inter-
national City Management Association Retirement Corporation as Trustee under the
aforesaid trust agreement, and according to the aforesaid deferred compensation
agreement, and
WHEREAS, Ray S.. Wells has accepted employment with the City of Lakewood,
Colorado, and has resigned his position -as City Manager of the City of Iowa City,
Iowa, effective September 20, 1974, and
IsWHEREAS, the City of Iowa City, Iowa, has no present or future interest in
the funds so far deposited with the Trustee, and desires to avoid further continuing
expense in maintaining the records of the aforesaid deferred compensation agreement
between the City of Iowa City, Iowa, and Ray S. Wells, and finally
WHEREAS, the International City Management Association Retirement Corporation
has established a Tripartite Agreement Procedure for the transfer of the ownership,
control and right of withdrawal of funds deposited by one City to the account of
another city.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF IOWA CITY,
Iowa,
That the Mayor and the City Clerk of the City of Iowa City, Iowa,
are hereby authorized and instructed to execute on behalf of the City of
Iowa City, Iowa, a Tripartite Agreement among the City of Iowa City, Iowa,
the City of Lakewood, Colorado, and the International City Management
Association Retirement Corporation as Trustee for the transfer of funds,
assets and accumulations from the ownership, control and right of with-
drawal of the City of Iowa City, Iowa, to the ownership, control and right
of withdrawal of the City of Lakewood, Colorado, effective September 20,
1974.
It was moved by dPp,,,GGP and seconded by
that the REsolution as read be adopted, and
upon roll call there were:
AYES: NAYS: ABSENT:
X— Czarnecki
X— Brandt
_X Davidsen
X_ deProsse
X_ White
Passed and approved this 17th day of September, 1974.
ATTEST
City Clerk
RESOLUTION NO: ``74=409
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING CONTINUANCE OF A MASTER TRUST AGREEMENT WITH
THE INTERNATIONAL CITY MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION RETIREMENT CORPORATION.
WHEREAS,..the_City Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa, on December 21,
1973, by Resolution No. 73-547 authorized a deferred compensation agreement with
Ray S. Wells and further authorized the execution of a master trust agreement
with the International City Management Association Retirer.,,�_-nt Corporation as
trustee for the deposit of funds, and
WHEREAS, participation in a deferred compensation agreement underneath the
master trust agreement is available to other City staff members eligible for par-
ticipation by virtue of their membership in professional organizations included
under the master trust agreement, and
WHEREAS, certain income tax benefits accrue to City staff persons through
participation in the said plans, and
WHEREAS, the :City recognizes that the tax advantages of the said plan to
eligible City staff constitute a benefit to the City by allowing the City to offer
an additional "fringe benefit" in recruiting and retaining qualified personnel in
its employment at no cost or charge to the City except the nominal cost of records
maintenance and, finally
WHEREAS, the City Manager should be able to execute on behalf of the City
of Iowa City, Iowa, a deferred compensation agreement between the City and a
qualified staff person, upon application of such qualified staff person.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF IOWA CITY, IOWA.
That the master trust agreement with the International City Management
Association Retirement Corporation as trustee for the deposit of funds
should be continued and that authorization is hereby given to expand the
participation in deferred compensation arrangements to other staff members
eligible for participation by virtue of their membership in professional
organizations included under the master trust agreement and the City
Manager of Iowa City, Iowa, is hereby authorized to execute on behalf of
the City of Iowa City, Iowa, a deferred compensation agreement between the
City and any qualified staff person who chooses to participate under the
master trust agreement.
It was moved by Davidsen
Brandt
and upon roll call there were:
AYES: NAYS:
X
X
X
X
X
ABSENT:
and seconded by
that the Resolution as read be adopted,
Czarnecki
Brandt
Davidsen
deProsse
White
Passed and approved this 17th day of September, 1974.
ATTEST: Z
City Clerk
i
LLL
RESOLUTION APPROVING CONTRACT AND BOND
CIVIC CENTER ROOF 'REPAIR PROJECT
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF IOWA CITY, IOWA:
That the contract
and bond
executed by Hawkeye Roofing
ftepatr
& Home
of Cedar Rapids,
Iowa
dated September 13
1974 ,
for the construction of Civic Center Roof Repair Projert
within the City of Iowa City, Iowa, as described in the plans and specifica-
tions and which have been signed by the Mayor and City Clerk on behalf of the
City of Iowa City, Iowa be and the same are hereby approved.
It was moved by R,�t and seconded by
that the resolution as read be adopted, and upon roll call there were:
Brandt
AYES: NAYS: ABSENT:
W_
GblKa= Davidson W
Czarnecki
(H hXd5YgY:& deProsse y_
White _X
Passed and approved this 17th day of S ep +7. , 1974 .
ATTEST:
THIS AGREEMENT d d
ma a an entered into this /_ day of
Sept ember ;' 19 74 by and between the
City of Iowa City. Iowa _
party of the first part, hereinafter referred to as the Owner
and Hawkeye Roofing F,_Home Improvement Company of Cedar Rapids, IA _
party of the second part, hereinafter referred to as the "Contractor".
WITNESSETH:
That whereas the Owner has heretofore caused to be prepared
certain plans, specifications and proposal blanks, dated the 6th
day of August ; 19 74 , for
the_Civic Center Roof Repair Proiect
under the terms and conditions therein fully stated and set forth,
and.
Whereas, said plans, specifications and proposal accurately,
and fully describe the terms and conditions upon which the Contractor
is willing to perform the work specified:
NODI, THEREFORE, 7T IS AGREED:
1. That the Owner hereby"accepts the proposal of the Contractor
for the work and for the sums listed below:
C-01
UNIT
EXTENDED
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY
UNIT
PRICE
AMOUNT
1.
Roofing
143
squares
$110.31
$ 15,774.33
2.
Roofing & Insulation
84
squares
170.30
14,305.20
3.
Edge Curb & Flashing
1,200
lin ft
14.54
17,448.00
4.
Joint Expansion
40
lin ft
10.00
400.00
5.
Roof Walkway
178
lin ft
10.84
1,929.52
TOTAL EXTENDED
AMOUNT
$ 49,857.05
C-01
b. Detailed Specifications for
c. Plans
CIVIC CENTER ROOF REPAIR PROJECT
N,cice of Public Hearing and Notice to Bidders
Instructions to Bidders
Special Conditions
Supplemental General Conditions
General Conditions
Proposal
This Instrument
Above components are complementary and what is called for by
one shall be as binding as if called for by all.
3. That payments are to be made to the Contractor in accordance
with and subject to the provisions embodied in the documents
made a part of this Contract.
4. That this Contract is executed in three (33) copies.
IN WITNESS
WHEREOF, the parties hereto have hereunto set their
hands and seals
the date first written above.
Hawkeye Roofing
& Home
CITY OF I0YA CITY
IOWA Contractor
Improvement Co.
of -Ee-d eaj�ids
(.��� ;��/-
By _ _'':='�;�-..%" -
.;:n;,t, (Seal) By
(Title)/ INayor,/1 (Title) Vice -President
ATTEST: ATTEST.:
r
(Title) City .Clerk (Title) ' Treasurer
(Company Of zci4
C - OZ
_is
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF IOWA CITY, IOWA:
That the contract and bond executed by Barker's, Inc.
of Iowa City dated Sept. 13 , 19 74,
for the construction of
1974 Sanitary
Landfill
Excavation
l
_
J
J
4
City, Iowa,
V
in the plans and specifica-
74
RESOLUTIONNO.
RESOLUTION
APPROVING CONTRACT
AND BOND
1974
SANITARY
LANDFILL EXCAVATION CONTRACT
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF IOWA CITY, IOWA:
That the contract and bond executed by Barker's, Inc.
of Iowa City dated Sept. 13 , 19 74,
for the construction of
1974 Sanitary
Landfill
Excavation
Contract
within the City of Iowa
City, Iowa,
as described
in the plans and specifica-
tions and which have been signed by the Mayor and City Clerk on behalf of the
City of Iowa City, Iova be and the same are hereby approved.
It was moved by ,, •, and seconded by
dePrzessee-
that the resolut.lon as read be adopted, and upon roll call there were:
AYES: NAYS:
Brandt X
XNAHM Davidsen _ X
Czarnecki X
t jhKKJW Ya deProsse X
ABSENT -
white X
Passed and approved this 17th day of Sept. 19 74
ATTEST:
WITNESSETH:
That whereas the owner _ has heretofore caused to be prepared
certain plans, specifications and proposal blanks, dated the Sth
day of August , 19 74 , for the 1974 SANITARY LANDFILL
EXCAVATION PROJECT
under the terms and conditions therein fully stated and set forth,
and.
Whereas, said plans, specifications and proposal accurately,
and fully describe the terms and conditions upon which the Contractor
is willing to perform the.work specified:
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED:
1. That the Owner hereby -accepts the proposal of the Contractor
for the work and for the sums listed below:
ITEM DESCRIPTION
1. Excavate Material, Stockpile
and Shape as Required
UNIT EXTENDED
QUANTITY UNIT PRICE AMOUNT
971000 cu yd $ 1.23
TOTAL EXTENDED A14OUNT
C-01
'A
$ 119,310.00
$ 1190310.00
h'cb'
�
•
J
t
�
T
'4
i•• \
y.
CONTRACT'
THIS AGREEMENT, made
and entered into this /7 --;�
day of
September
19 74 by and between the
,
,
City of Iowa City,
Iowa
party
of the first part,
hereinafter referred to as
the
owner
and
Barker's Inc. of Iowa City, Iowa
party
of the second part,
hereinafter referred to as
the
"Contractor".
WITNESSETH:
That whereas the owner _ has heretofore caused to be prepared
certain plans, specifications and proposal blanks, dated the Sth
day of August , 19 74 , for the 1974 SANITARY LANDFILL
EXCAVATION PROJECT
under the terms and conditions therein fully stated and set forth,
and.
Whereas, said plans, specifications and proposal accurately,
and fully describe the terms and conditions upon which the Contractor
is willing to perform the.work specified:
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED:
1. That the Owner hereby -accepts the proposal of the Contractor
for the work and for the sums listed below:
ITEM DESCRIPTION
1. Excavate Material, Stockpile
and Shape as Required
UNIT EXTENDED
QUANTITY UNIT PRICE AMOUNT
971000 cu yd $ 1.23
TOTAL EXTENDED A14OUNT
C-01
'A
$ 119,310.00
$ 1190310.00
-Is
Sg
-.•
'?. That this Contract consists ofthe following_component parts
which:.are made=„a part of ._this 'agr.eement_._'-and :Contract as •fully
and absolutely as if they were se,t;out in detail in this Contract:
a. Addenda Numbers
NnnP
b. Detailed Specifications for 1974 SANITARY LANDFILL .EXCAVATION
PROJECT
c. Plans
d. Notice of Public Hearing and Notice to Bidders
e. Instructions to Bidders
f. Special Conditions
g. Supplemental General Conditions
h. General Conditions
i. Proposal
j. This Instrument
Above components are complementary and what is called for by
one shall be as binding as if called for by all.
3. That payments are to be made to the Contractor in accordance
with and subject to the provisions embodied in the documents
made a part of this Contract.
4. That this Contract is executed in THREE (3) copies.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have hereunto set their
hands and seals the date first written above.
CITY OF I0M CITY,_ IOi4A
By ��%S 'ice '_-7.-
(Title)
ATTEST:
�;
P
(Title) City Clerk
�
Contractor
r
f
_
;.�_
(Seal)
(Seal) BY
_ (Title)
r�
ATTEST:
(Title) Gtr• %Lu L2�.<
�f
ompany icia
C-02
i
74 -
RESOLUTION APPROVING CONTRACT AND BOND'- POLLUTION CONTROL PI
PAVI14G PROJECT #1
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY, COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF IOWA CITY, IOWA:
That the contract and bond executed by
Iowa Road Builders, Inc. of
Des Moines, Iowa
dated September 13 , 19 •74 , for the construction of
Pollution Control Plant Paving Project #1
within the City of Iowa City, Iowa, as described in the plans and specifications
and which have been signed by the Mayor and City Clerk on behalf of the City of
Iowa City, Iowa, be and the same are hereby approved.
It was moved by Davidsen and seconded by White
that the resolution as read be adopted, and upon roll call there were:
AYES: NAYS: ABSENT:
X
Brandt
MIMg Davidsen X
X
Q7,
deProsse X
X
�dhltf
Passed and approved this 17th day of September , 1974 -
ATTEST:
.:.CONTRACT
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this TC. day of
September , 19 74 , by and between the CITY
OF IOWA CITY, IOWA
party of the first part, hereinafter referred to as the Owner
and Iowa Road Builders of Des.Moines, Iowa"
party of the second part, hereinafter referred to as the "Contractor".
WITNESSETH:
That whereas the owner has heretofore caused to be prepared
certain plans, specifications and proposal blanks, dated the 17th
day of July ,,19 74 , for The POLLUTION CONTROL PLANT
ROADWAY PAVING PROJECT #1(ALTERNATE A)
under the terms and conditions therein fully stated and set forth,
and.
Whereas, said plans, specifications and proposal accurately,
and fully describe the :erns and conditions upon which the Contractor
i5 willing to perform the work specified:
TOTAL EXTENDED Ab10UNT
(ALTERNATE A)
C-01
$12,446.70
NOW2 THEREFORE,`IT IS AGREED:
1. That the Owner hereby -accepts
the
proposal
of the Contractor
for the work and for.the
sums listed
below:
UNIT
EXTE
ITE11
DESCRIPTION
UQ ANTITY
UNIT
PRICE
AMOUNT
1.
30" x 6" PCC Integral Curb
374
lin ft
$ 4.25
$ 3,714.50 -
Gutter
2.
4" Asphalt Base
266`
tons
19.40
5,160.40
3.
2" Asphalt Surface
137
tons
23.40
3,205.80
4.
Tack Coat i-
488 '
gals
0.75
366.00
5.
1" - 3" Crushed Rock
as req'd
tons
8.50
_
TOTAL EXTENDED Ab10UNT
(ALTERNATE A)
C-01
$12,446.70
��� t
�F i r 1 Y
- •S.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
<
hereunto
set their
hands and seals the date
first written above.
10,,'13
gU;Iders CO.
OF�OWA_CITY<7!0WA.
Contractor ;,
- ;,=;
2. That this Contract consists"of
CITY
the following
�•
component parts.
which are made a part
of this
agreement
and
Contract as fully
and absolutely as if
they tiere'`set
out
in detail
in this Contract:
a. Addenda Numbers
None
b. Detailed Specifications for POLLUTION CONTROL PLANT ROADWAY
PAVING PROJECT #1 ( ALTERNATE A)
c. Plans
d. Notice of Public Hearing and Notice to Bidders
e. Instructions to Bidders
f. Special Conditions
g. Supplemental General.Conditions
h. General Conditions
i. Proposal
j. This Instrument
Above components are complementary and what is called for by
one shall be as binding as if called for by all.
3. That payments are to be made to the Contractor in accordance
with and subject to the provisions 'embodied in the documents
made a part of this Contract.
4. That this Contract
is executed in three (3)
copies.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
the parties hereto have
hereunto
set their
hands and seals the date
first written above.
10,,'13
gU;Iders CO.
OF�OWA_CITY<7!0WA.
Contractor ;,
- ;,=;
i,•,,,✓r"' (Seal)
CITY
�•
B
y
(Title) Mayor
,16-k'Seal) By
ATTEST:
(Title) City Clerk
_
V
(Title) -• -�•
ATTEST!
(Title)'.~ a ,;i3s;ee•n,
(Company ticial)
C-02
LUT FRUJEUT
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF IOWA CITY, IOWA:
That the contract and bond executed by
Iowa Road Builders
dated
September 13
of Des Moines, Iowa___
, 19. 74 , for the construction of
College Street Parking Lot Project
within the City of Iowa City, Iowa, as described in the plans and specifications
and which have been signed by the Mayor and City Clerk on behalf of the City of
Iowa City, Iowa, be and the same are hereby approved.
It was moved by
White and seconded by deProsse
that the resolution as read be adopted, and upon roll call there were:
AYES: NAYS: ABSENT:
Brandt X
22}v' i Dam Ll C2 on X
Czarnp^�� X -
idira4aesrs�n deProsse_____
X
X
Wh�tP
Passed and approved this 17th day of September , 19 74.
ATTEST:
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this %-'i, day of
September , 19 74 , by and between the
CITY OF IOWA CITY, IOWA
party of the first part, hereinafter referred to as the Owner
and Iowa Road Builders of Des Moines, Iowa
party of the second part, hereinafter referred to as the "Contractor"
WITNESSETH•
That whereas the Owner has heretofore caused to be prepared
certain plans, specifications and proposal blanks, dated the 315t.
day of July , 19 74 , for the COLLEGE STREET PARKING LOT
under the terms and conditions therein fully stated and set forth,
and.
Whereas, said plans, specifications and proposal accurately,
and fully describe the terms and conditions upon which the Contractor
is willing to perform the work specified:
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED:
1. That the Owner hereby -accepts the proposal o€ the Contractor
for the work and for the sums listed below:
C-01
1:�
TOTAL EXTENDED A314OUNT Y 12,952.85
UNIT
EXTENDED
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY
UNIT
PPICE
AMOUNT
1.
Type A Asphaltic Conc.
800
tons
$ 21.40
$ 17 ,120.00
2.
Type A Asphaltic Conc. Median
250
tons
23.40
5,3S0.00
3.
Asphaltic Conc. Curb
645
lin ft
1.48
954.60
4.
Crushed Stone Base
1,394
tons
8.50
11,819.00
5,
7" PCC Pavement
85
sq yd
15.00
1,275.00
6.
4" PCC Sidewalk
180_
sq ft
1.50
270.00
7.
12" Storm Sewer
"' 20
lin ft
15.00
300.00
8.
Inlet
2
each
500.00
1,000.00
9.
Tack
1,745
gal
0.65
1,134.25
10.
Pavement Removal
800
sq yd
2.50
2,000.00
11.
Remove Inlets v Rebuild Storm
Sewer/Lump Sum
1200.00
1,200.00
C-01
1:�
TOTAL EXTENDED A314OUNT Y 12,952.85
:Ounty
planning commission
LL172 south dubuque street, iowa city, iowa 52240 f"191351-8556
September 6, 1974
Mayor Czarnecki and Members of the
City Council
Civic Center
Iowa City, Iowa 52240
Dear Mr. '.Mayor and Members of the City Council:
I potnck wtrte C a'm
rob&t hlgenberg e.ecWrve 0,re "
At its meeting of September 4, 1c--74, the Johnson County Commission on Environ-
mental Quality voted to submit to the City Council for review the latest rough
draft of the proposed noise control ordinance, under consideration by the
Coirvnission. Attached is a copy of the above-mentioned ordinance together with
comments and recommendations by John W. Hayek, Attorney-at-law, and Iowa -Illinois
Gas and Electric Company.
The Commission on Environmental Quality would greatly appreciate your reviewing
these attached items. We would like to emphasize that the enclosed ordinance is
only a rough draft and will need considerable refinement and reorganization. The
Commission would also paint out that at the present, additional studies are being
conducted in relation to the Environmentalprotection Office discussed in sections
3.1 through 42 of the noise ordinance. The studies being conducted are primarily
concerned with the role of the Environmental Protection Officer in other cities
and and how such a position could be developed in Iowa City or Johnson County in
conjunction with existing laws. Also under investigation in greater depth are the
duties and responsibilities associated with this position.
The Commission on Environmental Quality.also requests that a joint meeting be
held between the Commission and the City Council to discuss the enclosed ordinance
and comments. If convenient, the Commission on Environmental Quality requests
that such a meeting be scheduled within the time period of September 25 to
October 2.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Glen Njus
Administrative Assistant
Johnson County Commission on Environmental Quality
GN/km
ENCLOSURE
sa
:Ounty
planning commission
LL172 south dubuque street, iowa city, iowa 52240 f"191351-8556
September 6, 1974
Mayor Czarnecki and Members of the
City Council
Civic Center
Iowa City, Iowa 52240
Dear Mr. '.Mayor and Members of the City Council:
I potnck wtrte C a'm
rob&t hlgenberg e.ecWrve 0,re "
At its meeting of September 4, 1c--74, the Johnson County Commission on Environ-
mental Quality voted to submit to the City Council for review the latest rough
draft of the proposed noise control ordinance, under consideration by the
Coirvnission. Attached is a copy of the above-mentioned ordinance together with
comments and recommendations by John W. Hayek, Attorney-at-law, and Iowa -Illinois
Gas and Electric Company.
The Commission on Environmental Quality would greatly appreciate your reviewing
these attached items. We would like to emphasize that the enclosed ordinance is
only a rough draft and will need considerable refinement and reorganization. The
Commission would also paint out that at the present, additional studies are being
conducted in relation to the Environmentalprotection Office discussed in sections
3.1 through 42 of the noise ordinance. The studies being conducted are primarily
concerned with the role of the Environmental Protection Officer in other cities
and and how such a position could be developed in Iowa City or Johnson County in
conjunction with existing laws. Also under investigation in greater depth are the
duties and responsibilities associated with this position.
The Commission on Environmental Quality.also requests that a joint meeting be
held between the Commission and the City Council to discuss the enclosed ordinance
and comments. If convenient, the Commission on Environmental Quality requests
that such a meeting be scheduled within the time period of September 25 to
October 2.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Glen Njus
Administrative Assistant
Johnson County Commission on Environmental Quality
GN/km
ENCLOSURE
the violation hereof and to repeal all ordinances in conflict
herewith.
SECTION 11 DE'tINITIONS AND STA NDARDS. All terminology used in
this ordinance, not defined below, shall be in conformance with
applicable publications of the American National Standards In-
stitute (ANSI) or its successor body. The following terms shall
be defined as follows:
1. A -weighted Sound pressure Level: The sound pressure
level as measured on a sound level meter using the A -weighting
network. The level so read shall be postscripted db(A) or dbA.
2. Ambient Noise Level: The sound pressure level od all
encompassing noise associated :with a given envirommnet, being
,~s..akly a. composite of sounds from many sources. The weighted
sound -o essure level exceeded 90 percent of the time based on
a one-hour period.
3. Continuous noise: A steady, fluctuating, or impact,
noise which exists, essentially without interruption,.for a
period of one hour or more.
4. Cyclically -varying Noise: Steady, fluctuating, or impul-
sive noise which may or may not contain a pure tone, which varies
in sound pressure level such that the same level is obtained
repetitively at reasmnably uniform intervals of time.
5. Decibel: A logarithmic (dimensionless) unit of measure
often used in describing the amplitude of sound. The notation is dB.
6. Device: Any mechanism which.is intended to, or which
:_actually produces noise :whenoperated,;:or::handled.:
by mechanical power.
Motorboat.
Any vehicle which is primarily operated on water
or which does operate on water, such as boats,
barges, amphibious craft, hover craft, and which
is propelled by mechanical power,, and can carry passengers.
Muffler.
Any apparatus consisting of baffln_s,
chambers, or acoustical absorbing material
whose primary purpose is to transmit liquids
or oases while causing a reduction in sound
emission at one end. To qualify, such an
apparatus must cause a reduction in sound
pressure level of at least (x) dB(A) upon
insertion into the system for which it
intended.
17 Noise.
Any sound ;rhich is unwanted or which
i
causes or tends to cause an adverse
psychological or physiological effect
on human beings.
can be propelled by r:eans.
23 Property Boundary.
An .imaginary line ext-erio.r to any enclosed structure,
.i
at the ground surface, which separates the real
property owned by one person from that owned by
another person, and its vertical extension.
24 Public Right -of -Way.
Any street, avenue, boulevard, highway, alley,
or public space which is owned or controlled by
a public governmental entity.
25 Repetitive Impulsive Noise.
Any noise which is composed of impulsive noises
that are repeated at sufficiently slow rates such
that a sound level meter set at "fast" meter
characteristic will show changes in sound pressure
1 �e1 greater than 20 dB(A).
.26 PUMS Sound Pressure.
It is the square root of the time averaged
i
square of the sound pressure. It is denoted
Prms .
j
22 Po.4--r.-d 1•16de Vel`F
es T S
Auly Ix)wered veiri.cles,
either airborne;} watex-
borne, or landbor.:e,
1rnzch are designed not to
carry persons or P --,1p,--1
--tr S-0.1 as, b'a not 1i ra=ted
to, model airplanes;,
1., .,ts, ._.tc::, rn is '._ , and
which
can be propelled by r:eans.
23 Property Boundary.
An .imaginary line ext-erio.r to any enclosed structure,
.i
at the ground surface, which separates the real
property owned by one person from that owned by
another person, and its vertical extension.
24 Public Right -of -Way.
Any street, avenue, boulevard, highway, alley,
or public space which is owned or controlled by
a public governmental entity.
25 Repetitive Impulsive Noise.
Any noise which is composed of impulsive noises
that are repeated at sufficiently slow rates such
that a sound level meter set at "fast" meter
characteristic will show changes in sound pressure
1 �e1 greater than 20 dB(A).
.26 PUMS Sound Pressure.
It is the square root of the time averaged
i
square of the sound pressure. It is denoted
Prms .
v
m
m
v
n�
G�
m
z
n
SECTION,, • J �o F
1 D'1 - The purpose ofthis Ordinance . is to
:._ :.: prevent
noise which ra, jeopardize the health or welfare of the citizons
of Iowa City; establish standards and limits for permitted
noise within tr: �ity of Iowa City, Iowa; to provide for standards
for violation of this ordinance and to establish penalties for
the violation hereof and -to repeal all ordinances in conflict
herewith.
�TIUIN6 AND STA NDARDS . All terminology used in
this ordinance, not defined below, shall be in conformance with
applicable publications of the American National Standards In-
stitute (ANSI) or it: successor body. The following terms shall
be defined as follows:
1. A -weighted Sound Pressure Level: The sound pressure
level as measured on a sound level mater using the A-we,giltir^
network. The level SO read shall be POstscripted db(A) or db A.
2. Ambient Noise Level: The sound pressure level od all
encompassing noise associated with a given envirommnet, being
us+,akly a, composite of sounds from many sources. The __-weighted
sound pressure level exceeded 90 percent of the time based on
a one-hour period.
3• Continuous noise: A steady, fluctuating, or impact,,#
noise which exists, essentially without interruption, for a
period of one .hour or more.
4. Cyclically -varying Noise: Steady, fluctuating, or impul-
sive noise which may or may not contain a pure tone, which varies
in sound pressure level such that the same level is obtained
repetitively at reas6nably uniform intervals of time.
5• Decibel: A logarithmic (dimensionless) unit of measure
often used in describing the amplitude of sound. The notation is dB.
6. Davic:e: Any mechanism.which is intended to, or which
actuall
y: produce:i_:;_noise . when --operate:d or ,handled.
`amity, or work required -to ;{protect persons or property_ rom
imminent exposure to danger. A motor vehicle used in.response
- . ... _.
to a public calazidty or to"protect persons or property rom an
imminent exposure 'to danger.
9, Fluctuating Noise: THE sound pressure level of c nose
"which varies more than 6 d-B (-k during the period of observation
when measured-with t}i-e--slow meter characterisitc of a sound
•1eve1 meter, acid does not equal the previously existing ambient
noise level"more-than once during the period of observation.
10. Impulsive Noise A noise containing excursior_s usually
-less than-one second, of sound pressure level 20 dB over e
.....
ambient sound pressure level, using the "fast" meter characterisitc.
11: Zeve1; bay=Nights A 24 hour average of the A_wei;hted
sound pressure level; with the levels during the period 10 p.m.
to 7 a.m:""ilcreased-by 10 dB(-.) before averaging. It is denote dna,
12, Level"; Tenth"Percentile. The A-weighted sound pressure
level that --is _ dxceed"e7d7ten peieeir t of the time, or the level that
is-exceeded76-minutes-in one hour, is denoted L10.
13.-'Level;-._Vinetieth"Percentile. The A-weighted sound pressure
-levi that is-'exceeded ninety percent of the time, or the level that
is emeeeded for $t► minutes in one hour; is denoted L90.
campers, motor- 1.
cycles, minibikes, ,.)-c;arts, snowmobiles, amphibuous craft
on land, dune buggi(�u, racing �-chicles, which are propelled
by mechanical power.
Motorboat.
Any vehicle which Is primarily operated on watr=r
or which does operate, on coater, such as boats,
barges, amphibious 'craft, hover craft, and which
is propelled by mechanical power and can carry passengers.
,�'e, Muf11er.
Any apparatus consisting of baffles,
chambers, or acoustical absorbing material
whose primary purpose is to transmit liquids
or gases while causing a reduction in sound
emission at one end. To qualify, such an
apparatus must cause a reduction in sound
pressure level of at least (x) dB(A) upon
insertion into the system for which it is
intended.
17 Noise.
Any sound which is unwanted or which
causes or tends to cause an adverse
psychological or physiological effect
on human beings.
i - - -
18 _ Noise Di s turbarice • •
.any sound whzc toys, disturbS,;or.perturbs
'reasonable;• ;
fir- •� with normal sensitivities;
or any sound ;; '.::: injures or endangers the
comfort, reposes, `ealth, hearing, peace, or,
safety of other p.-rsons.
19 Perception Threshold.
The minimum vibrational motion necessaz;y "C' cause
awareness of its e:ristence on the part of a , tcxmal
person, by direct means, such as, but not limited to,
sensation by touch or visual observations of moving
objects_ For the .Purpose of this ordinance, any
vibration: which prOduces.•.z,ore than 0.05 in/sec RMS vertical
velocity shall be considered to be in excess of this
ordinance.
20 Person.
Any human being, firn, association,
organisation, partnership, business,
trust, corporation, company, contractor,
supplier, installer, user, owner, �r
operator and shall include any municipal
corporation or its officers oZ employees.
21 Plainly Audible Noise.
Any noise for which the information content
of that noise is unambiguously communicated
to the listener, such as, but not limited to,
understanding of spoken speech, comprehension
of whether a voice is raised or normal, or
comprehension of m!zsical rhythms.
i
to, model airplanes, 1,n.crv, carz:, end
can be propelled by r::echinicai Mearns.
23 Property Boundary.
An .imaginary line exterior to any enclese_I str
at the ground surface, which separates the rea,
property owned by one person from that owned b
another person, and its vertical extension.
24 Public Right -of -Way.
Any street, avenue, boulevard, highway, alley,
or public space which is owned or controlled b5
a public governmental entity.
25 Repetitive Impulsive Noise.
Any noise which is composed of impulsive noise:
that are repeated at sufficiently slow rates s:
that a sound level meter set at "fast" meter
characteristic will show changes in.sound press
1^7el. greater than 20 dB(A).
26 MIS Sound Pressure.
Xt is
the
square root of the
time
averaged
sluare
of
the sound pressure.
Xt
is denoted
Prms .
or other piya_cal'yuantity, in a medium with
internal rhat causes compression and rare-
faction of Lh_x--x-dium, and which propagates. at
i aite speed to distant points.
28 Sound Level IMe-ter.
An instrument, including a microphone, amp].«icr,
RIS detector, or time averager, out;�ut meter and
weighting networks, that is sensitive to pressure
fluctuations. The output meter reads sound pressure
level when prope.cly calibrated and the instrument is
of Type 2 or better as specified in American National
Standards Institute Publication Sl.4-1971, or its
successor publication.
29 Sound Pressure.
The instantaneous difference between the
actual pressure and the average or barometric
Pressure at a given point in space.
30 Sound Pressure Level.
It is 7.0 times the logarithm. to the base 10
of the ratio of the RIS sound pressure to the
reference pressure which shall be 20 micropascals.
It is denoted P or SPL. .
31 Sound Porter.
The total work done by a sound source, on the
surrounding medium, per unit time, which is
Propagated away from the source as sound waves.
H
C) L
-12 caatts. it s denoted
powEer :which shall he
as I, or PWL_
33 Stationary Noise Source.
1,,Y _equipment or taxed or nnvable,
sole of emiti=inl 5ot1nd beyond the property
1 i i
cap -
boundary
Of the pxopFrty on which it is c5� - I
34 Steady Noise.
The sound pressure level of a steady noise �.
Y
remains essentially constant during the
S
period of observation, i.e.; it does not
(F
vary more than 6 dB (A) when measured with
r
the "slow" meter characteristic of a sound
level Teter.
35 Vibration.
I
A.tem_noral and spatial oscillation of dis- 1
placeirent, velocity or acceleration in a
solid material.
36 Weekday.
Any tlonday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday,
or Friday during a week in which there are
no legal holidays.
�_ cn:ronal Protection Offi�Ce
f.
.•Sraion
The no—'-.. __�ztrol progre:n requir'd `by this ordinance shall
i
be ad::r --red -hy the Environmental protection
Office(r).
L Liopa'rtmental Actions.
All shall, to the fullest extent consistent with
their autho)-.itles under other ordinances administered by them,
(_;KY
;.
carry out their programs in such a manner as to further tl:e
;+.y
policy stated in Article II of this ordinance.
ri
3 Departmental Cooperation
All departtrznts shall cooperate with the Environmental
Protection Officer (or Noise Control officer) to the
fullest extent in enforcing the noise regulations of
i
this ordinance_
.4 Compliance with other laws.
i
All departments engaged in any activities which result
i
or may result in the emission of noise, shall comply
with Federal and State laws and regulations, as well as j
i
the, provisions of this ordinance, respecting the control
and abatement of noise to the same extent that any person
is subject to such laws and regulations.
5 Project Appoval.
r
Each department, whose duty it is to review and
approve new projects, or changes to existing projects,
that result, or may result, in the emission of noise,
shall consult with the Environinentai Protection (Noise
Control) Officer) prior to any such approval.
r
ordinance, he may rayuesr :;uiJi decartment to review and
report to him on the advisability .of revising such
standard or regulation to confor,».
Section .I Powers of Environmental Protection Office.
In order to _impleme,-tt the purposes of this
ordinance, the Ernvironmental Protection Office(r)
shall have the power to:
4,11 0 Studies.
0
Conduct, or cause to be conducted, studies,
research, and monitoring related to noise.
2 Education.
Conduct programs of public education regarding the
i
I
causes and effects. of noise but not. the means for its
abatement, and to encourage the participation of public
interest groups in related public information efforts.
? Coordination and Cooperation.
Coordinate the noise control activities of
all municipal departments and cooperate where
practicable with all appropriate municipal,
county, state, and federal agencies to best-
implement
estimplement the purposes of this ordinance and,
where appropriate, enter into contracts (with
the approval of the City Council) for the pro-
vision of technical or enforcement services.
ordin ance.
r.^.is
shall include
the review
of all lic:n-naing
applications
where noise
may be an i.mportat nfactor.
5 Inspections
For reasonable cause and upon presentation
of proper credentials, enter any building,
property, premises, or place and inspect any
noise source for the purpose of ascertaining
the compliance or non-compliance with any
provision of this ordinance, or have access
to, and require the production of, books
:.anal papers pertinent to any matter under
i
r
in✓estigation.
6 Records
Require the owner or operator of any noise i
i
i
source to establish and maintain records and �
' I
mace such re_aorts as the Environmental Protection i
I
(noise control) office(r) may reasonably prescribe. i
I
7 M.aasurements
Require the owner or operator of any noise source
to measure the noise emissions thereof in accordance
P.
with such methods and procedures and at such locations
and times as the Environmental Protection (noise Control)
Officer) may reasonably prescribe.
Ordinal'.•.:••, t:lt? VnViroi'2. ental Protection Office(r)
+
shall. i..i .. •r+.2Lrec. to:
I Measurement Standards.
Develop a;.:rasnrement methods and standards c.hich
will further t_he purposes of this ordinance.
.Z Truck Routes.
Develop a truck route map of the community for
the purpose of a
3 En Forcement Procedures..
variance on truck noise.
Develop administrative procedures which will
provide for effective enforcement of this ordinance.
4 Enforcement of Federal Regulations.
Make recommendations for changes to this ordinance
so that it is consistent with all preemptive state
and Federal regulations, and provide for effective
enforcement of those changes.
5 Long Term Noise Goals.
Develop,a generalized noise map of the community,
develop long term objectives for achieving quiet in
the community and develop a means for implementing
NOISES PROHIBITED
SectionS.l General Prohibitions
It shall be unlawful for any person to make, continue,
or cause to be made or continued or caused any excessive,
or unusually loud noise, or to create a noise
disturbance within the limits of the City of I?
v
d
r -
Tile ;g acts enumerated
Glared to c�.., _ce�s�)-y noises in
that "lt!c: 10'./lilg enU:;'c'reI-Io1
tia. , '
c e,a`a ,..; 0;elusive.
lel SectIGns �*;-F:-aq tllr'Ou�fl ci'r� y ar
viols
ati011 (;r this Chapter provided,
si;wll not limit Section 31.5 and ,"11
sna,
7 R�1Dlii5, TELEVISIOtl SET H ^•..02, ou rr,'r
S, PraU,IN ,,,�,q. ,.S Ai;D $ L, GLA,. Dr- I -
be It steal l
be unlat;ful fcr ally person to use ore '
,. rote or perrIL to be played any radio
I eceiving se':,-xASical instrument television h,. ,o,: ,
rl,.aChlr,e rI- d Vl '• - �� ' > p' fir' yrc:rlrl, d U, Or G�fler
�.� ;or- the production or reproduction of sound in such a
ii:anner as to cause to be made Or Continued any unnecessary noise cis heard
Without imeasurer;;ent or as heard and measured in tile .lilanner described under
Sections 31.7 through 311.10 oil this Ordinance. The operation of any such
set, instrument, tel( -Vision, phonograph, machine or o"tft2r device at any
time in Such a G3anner as to be plainly audible at eitl;ei- the property line,
or 25 feet in the case.of a vehicle on public rights -o,°-
prima facie evidence of a violation of this Section. 1 -lay, shall be
.2 EXHAUSTS - MUFFLERS., No person shall discharge into the open air
the exhaust of any steam engine, stationary internal combustion engine,
air compressor equipment, motor boat, motor vehicle or other po•.ver device
except through a muffler or other noise reducing device which is in good
order and free of defects.
.3 BELLS AND CHIMES. It shall be unlawful for any person to use,
operate, cause or permit'to be sounded any bell orchilime or any device for
the production or reproduction of the sounds of bells or chimes from any
-
church, clock or school, between the hours o
" 10:00 P.M.n.m. and 7:00 a.m.
.4 QUIET ZONE, The creation -of any'unnecessary noise is prohibited within
the vicinity of any school, institution of learning, church or court While
the same are in use or session, which unreasonably interferes with the
1•rorkings of such institution, or within the vicinity of any Hospital, nursing
honie or home for the aged, or which disturbs or -unduly annoys patients in
the hospital or residents in the nursing hone or home for the aged, pro-
vided conspicuous signs are displayed in adjacent, surrounding or contiguous
streets indicating that the, same is a school, hospital, nursing home, home
for the aged, church or court.
.5 TRUCKLOArMNG OPERATIOiNS. The
handling of boxes, crates,
loading,
unloading,
opening or otnen•lise
containers,
such a rianner as to cause a disturbance,
garbage containers
and the
or
other objects in
trash or compactor truck, or any other
or handling of boxes,
truck, whereby
loading of any garbage,
the loading, Unloading,_
crates, equipment
a residential area or within 300
or other
objects is
conducted Within
feet of
of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. are prohibited.
any hotel
or motel
between the hours
.6 VEHICLE REPAIR OR TESTING. It shall be unlal•Iful
rutdify, or test any truck,
to repair, rebuild,
i ti :.11(:11 ,1
111,11111(!t'
autotrobile, motorcycle,
il`; I.() Cilllr ,1 ell : l uY'1,nrtC(`and
or Other motor vehicle
C'U'0:4, 1W
sub•jc(:l.
Lc) Lhe'liit:c`iuiinu 'il,lc.
Irl l
- l I, in all
district
in villich
:.uuncl
the source is located, as' hc:reiriu�l'Cos^
,r� .,�,r,:
iori. fur (,I,(:
7 I%iACiJi 'J ,�Y, ;?S `FAIJ
1-b
E.C�Ii�P.,��;T t ,h=d
air corp lzioni
n Iiia City or LT`. ice
pra2;sur! level `,''or ti:: -C.
after set forth.-
7
�'
3
AiR COiJOITI:OnERS I TliER ; icC11Ai11CAL
unlliufi,l to operate tv r,acP,incry, eciuip-
C up?at `ae.tus or s t lai l ar tlechani cal: device ,..,.; .
excess o the iii axitnu, permissible sound
in_4,^ich the source i, located, as her
y;)erson shall operate on any pi-;,oerty
l itrin i residential or i:r,;:.„ d:str�ct.�s) or on any public Way :,Ztiti,i a
residential or b;tsine:;r; a'i ;r'tc;.t:,5;) any power CijUiplii n'i rat . -d ibdT'C thFti it?
horsepo•rler: eXCILIding r,CtitSti':ic:i,1pn edtlip,;;ent used for Construc�lon aci.�iv7' ' ,
SLtCh a5 but not litllited to C:(ain sats. pavement breakers, log chippers,
riding tractors, powered iilnrl triols, betvle2n the hours of 10:GJ p.m. and
7:00 a.m.
_9 D0,•IESTIC I'04JFR EQUIPMENT. No Pel -son shall operate or p2rmii; to be
apera'ted on private property or on the public vlay within any residential or
commercial district(S) any pot•hr equipment rated five (5) norsepo:;er or less
and used for home or budding repair- or grounds maintenance between the hours
of 10:00 p.rr_ and 7:00 a.m. Such porter equipment shall include, but not be
limited to, lawn::,cvjers, garden' tools_ snow/ removal equipment, electric or
chain saves or any other power equip;nent used for home or building repair or
grounds maintenance.
.10 CONSTRUCTiON ACTIVITIES, The operation, or causing to be used or
operated any equipment used in construction activities in any residential
or business district between the hours of 9:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m. Construc-
tion projects shall be subject to the taaximum permissible noise level
specified for industrial districts for the period within which construction
is to be completed pursuant to any applicable building permit.
11 Animals.
ow,iing,.keeping, possessing, or harboring any
animal or animals which, by frequent or habitual
howling, barking, meowing, squawking, or other
noisemaking, cause a noise disturbance. The
also
provisions of this section shall/ apply to all
private or public facilities, including any animal
pounds, which hold or treat animals.
Exterior Loudspeakers.
Using or operating -any mechanical device or
loud3peaker in a fixed or movable position'
exterior to any building, or mounted upon any
motor vehicle or motorboat suc:: that the sound
zrce, or on a public way. except as
p_o-r_%dad mor .in section. 7.2
Vchicle :=repairs or Testing.
R
;,a g, .rebuilding, modifyiny or
tr•a:t.iag any rwtor vehicle (or off road
vehicles)or zvtorboat in or near a
residential use district in such a
manner as to cause noise disturbance
or violate the provisions of Article
Iq Impulsive Sources
ALTERNATIVE 1
The using of fireworks, explosives, or the
firing of guns or other explosive devices without
first obtaining a permit.
Powered Model Vehicles.
Operating or permitting the operation of
powered model vehicles between the hours
i
of (x) p.m. and (y) a.m. the following
marring. maximum sound pressure levels
during the permitted period of operation
shall conform to those set forth in Table
1 of Section 8.1 of Article VIII and shall
be mieasured at the property boundary of the
source or at a distance of (x) feet, if _it
is operated in a public place.
tt e vicinity of . ,;y .::naZ o: oLi:e-r institution of learning,
hospital, nur3inq ili; ;;;.!, c:ourt, or oihe,r d,'slgr:ated area
where exceptional quiet is tu.cussary, while the same are
in use, provided con::picuous signs are displayed .in
adjacent or contiguous streets, indicating that the sarre
is a quiet zone.
n- -Av �b,
Operating, or permitting to be operated, any
loudspeaker or other source of sound in any place
of public entertaim-7ent that exceeds those shorn
In Table B at jLny point that is normally occupied
by a hunan being.
Duration - hours per day
8
6
4
3
2
1 1/2
1
1/2
1/4 or less
Sound Pressure L --vel d13 (A)
Slow R&300nse
90
92
95
97
zoo
102
105
110
115
s
EXCEPTIONIS; AND ,PEPj11TS..;
SeCL:t)'*- Pmergency Exception
iio.t.:: :,' e _: ..:. c'd in the v--.vfor L:lnce of C ue.1-jarcy wow::: fo.r th.v
1PL'Trldi� ii:e' :iaz:Otlut health, or N.C?fa1.'P of tho cmL7 m.it y or
ind:V.btua:ls of the com:71unity, or. tJ reStOr: prof%vrtt) t0 a
safe r:;>nd.ition following a public calaadLy sha71 ltot be
subject to th-e provisions of this ordinance. l:othing in
this section shall be construed to permit- law enforcement,
arthul:2nce, fire, or other emergency personnel to rneka
excessive noise in the performance of their duti.-S when
such noise is clearly unnecessary.
Section ;' Permit Issuance
(0, CJ
The F:_-? .is authorized to grant permits
as required by any provision of this oxdi.narzce
as subject to such limitations as to area,
noise levels, time limits, and other teras
and .conditions as it determines are appropriate
to protect public health, safety, and welfare
from the noise emanating therefrom. This
Section shall in no way affect the duty to
obtain any other perrid t or license required
by law for such activities.
Section f=Xemptions for Time to comply
(7) Upon good cause shown by the owner
Of any noise source, the (City Administrator)
shall have the power to grant- an.cxemprion
iron the operation of thi Orc..7ijj (nce i77 orde.:
to allow sufficient time for installation of
needed control equipment, facilities, or
-codifications to achieve compliance not to
exceed (x) days, p-rov-ided that suchxempt.ion
may be renewed for an additional like period,
but only if satisfactory progress toward
compliance is shown.
R
bF=Jdl
i
(}�) Any person seck.ng cn cx��rnpt=-ori
shall file a petition yci.th Ll:e (En-
vi.ronmertal protection Offic&r) Th ZD
(Env ronmsntal F'rote� `:ion ^ffi cer) shall
promptly give written notice of such
peti t20R t0 any pE-rson who has i,
rrr:i.ting requested notice Of such
exemption petitions, and shall publish
notice of such peLi tion iIT r_ r_e;�saaper
of general c:irculatior: :�=th n t}:.s mt;.ni -'-
panty. The (Environmental Control OfficerJ,
in his discretion, conc_'udes that a hearing
would be advisable, or if any person files
a written request for a hearing or a written
objection to the grant of su.^h =-cemption
within (y) days of the r:otice provided herein,
a hearing shall be held on the _)et-itlon _ A
written transcript shall be kept of any such
hearing.
(c) in granting or denying an e:,cemption,
the (environrrenta.l Control Officer) shall
file and publish a written order, stating
the facts and reasons leading to his decision.
(}�) Any person seck.ng cn cx��rnpt=-ori
shall file a petition yci.th Ll:e (En-
vi.ronmertal protection Offic&r) Th ZD
(Env ronmsntal F'rote� `:ion ^ffi cer) shall
promptly give written notice of such
peti t20R t0 any pE-rson who has i,
rrr:i.ting requested notice Of such
exemption petitions, and shall publish
notice of such peLi tion iIT r_ r_e;�saaper
of general c:irculatior: :�=th n t}:.s mt;.ni -'-
panty. The (Environmental Control OfficerJ,
in his discretion, conc_'udes that a hearing
would be advisable, or if any person files
a written request for a hearing or a written
objection to the grant of su.^h =-cemption
within (y) days of the r:otice provided herein,
a hearing shall be held on the _)et-itlon _ A
written transcript shall be kept of any such
hearing.
(c) in granting or denying an e:,cemption,
the (environrrenta.l Control Officer) shall
file and publish a written order, stating
the facts and reasons leading to his decision.
P10TSE: LEVELS BY LAPID_:USE ' •
--
i`t1'<II UM PERMISSISL'� PRESSURE LEVELS.'
It shall b� unll „ul ,nr :r,y �--
1 s0;� �0 opeYdLe. or permit to be operated,
r,tl`I Stltion2f�, C0:1t, L10:; l:tr', of nOiGi j
;);''$sure level hl h v „-i. n SLIC11 a manner as to Create' a SOulld
a1 c e.,Cct. „ th, l iiui t; �� `urth in the fol l01•ring Table more
to nln2ty percent Of any hour .,f; n ii!. -t; ki C.::; at the r,rOT}^'t` bUUndar
Point 1':1 th 111 the property Ri' r att
i'Ci:l:;;.:I by the no i,;C. I.4hen a noise source fca l be c n�
1(tQllt7fi?d and its T10iSe <15i1i'%il I,I I!101"C tlidil Otl? land Use category_ the lim)ts
o. the Host restrictive use shall apply at the boundaries bet;•:een differelt land
liSe Categories.
SOUND PRESSURE LEVEL Lihi(T
dt3(A)
Use Dis_rict Day
7-. 00 _ tJicght
a_m� 10.00 p -m, 10:00 7:00 a.
R_sidential ' 55 —
Business 60 50
Industrial 75 55
75
(tJoise levels for any P.U.D. shall conform t•Tith this 'table, and silal l be
determined by the predominate land use as Set -iOrth in the
P. U, C. plan.)
Od_'?AT-10`1 CORRECTIODI It shall be unlawful for any
or permit to be operated any stationar source o�pnoise erson to operate
land use cat egory which creates fluet>»atinC thin any
and in which the tenth uercentile noise levels,smeasuredlineaccordnt;
with section :
with •the source making the noise, is more than
15 dB(A) Kreter than the ambient noise, measured when the source is
quiet, but, in no case, shall the tenth percentile levels exceed 70
dB(A) in residential land use zones.
CCRi::_CTICN FOR CHARACTER_ OF SOUND.
tt shall be Unlal"fUl f01' any person to Operate, 0, permit to be operated,
t), �.l�lvrl8i-yI COntit)UOUS SOU1Ce
�,;_y_. of noise which eriL. a pure tore, cyclicall
Inc, no'is,-, 0. repetitive imi;ulsive noise %liliCn exceeds 5 d3 /l y
ialit� s_�"c ;orth in Section 31.7. ( ) less titan the
`-2,q EXCLUS10NS,
The pro:•isior,s Of this Section shall not apply to motor vehicles operated
Jii Public i'T4ilt$.•.p; _;ydy fitly [)el j Oi" Chinle Or any device iOr th2 prGdUCt1011 Or
�)fOvL'Ctivn Of the Sound Of bells or chimes fY•Oni any church, clock or school;
s...e loading of any truck, domestic
%.D and Co;,T?rC'al p0•:rer egUIpi;ept"exceer ptlasn�pL except provided in Section
P provided ill
Stc'tion 3i_6.U,
i
r CM;'jcRC?AI. OR ! NOUSTRIAL LAPID USE.
No new commercial or industrial construction shall be approved, unless
it can b? shorn that the provisions of this Ordinance can be retfor land use
categories existing at the time of application for building permit.
NEW ROAD CONSTRUCTI0N.
�J ivo new road construction will be approved, vrhether local ly lund(:d or not,
for residential areas, unless necessary noise"control measures are taken to insure
that. the cualulative sound pressure levels due to all the vehicles on the completed
roadway do not exceed a LSO of 70 d6(A) at all points around any residences on a
w2e';d y.
-LONIN'G CHANGES.
7 All zoning changes which affect the land use categories shall be done
so that -the provisions of this Ordinance will not be violated.
7!'1 TRUTH IN SELLING OR RENTING
No person shall sell ,or rent, or cause to be sold or rented,
any structure to be used for habitation, outside of which the structuMe
the sound pressure levels are in excess of those permitted tinder this
ordinance, without malting full disclosure to all potential buyers or
renters of the existence of such noise disturbance.
SA
SECTION !g- ~. ROTOR VEPHICLE NOISE LEVELS The maximum sound pressure
level emitted by motor vehicles moving in a public right of way at any
time shall be as provided in table 2, . These shall include all motor
vehicles, whether publicly or privately owned, that are duly licensed
according to the laws of any state of the United Sates of America,
LANO: USE,,,
RES:D NT?! :U USE.
-_
t
-
4.
No buy.I _ permits trill
be issued for new
residential
construction,
a.thzr
sin;le or rrul ,p1e family;
if the exterior sound
pressure
level has a Lg0
n::ise leval
in t:xcc,> of 55 dB(t^,)
on a :tee} -,day and at
any point
on the proposed
s i -*L - a
For r„ul tistory buildings, the
City Manager or
his duly authorized
reps-
s,utative
nay requirf- that noise iaeasuremant be made
at heights
_
equal to the floor
lev-ls
of the proposed building to
assure that this
noise level
will not be '
e ceeded- at those h >.ic;hts. -
r CM;'jcRC?AI. OR ! NOUSTRIAL LAPID USE.
No new commercial or industrial construction shall be approved, unless
it can b? shorn that the provisions of this Ordinance can be retfor land use
categories existing at the time of application for building permit.
NEW ROAD CONSTRUCTI0N.
�J ivo new road construction will be approved, vrhether local ly lund(:d or not,
for residential areas, unless necessary noise"control measures are taken to insure
that. the cualulative sound pressure levels due to all the vehicles on the completed
roadway do not exceed a LSO of 70 d6(A) at all points around any residences on a
w2e';d y.
-LONIN'G CHANGES.
7 All zoning changes which affect the land use categories shall be done
so that -the provisions of this Ordinance will not be violated.
7!'1 TRUTH IN SELLING OR RENTING
No person shall sell ,or rent, or cause to be sold or rented,
any structure to be used for habitation, outside of which the structuMe
the sound pressure levels are in excess of those permitted tinder this
ordinance, without malting full disclosure to all potential buyers or
renters of the existence of such noise disturbance.
SA
SECTION !g- ~. ROTOR VEPHICLE NOISE LEVELS The maximum sound pressure
level emitted by motor vehicles moving in a public right of way at any
time shall be as provided in table 2, . These shall include all motor
vehicles, whether publicly or privately owned, that are duly licensed
according to the laws of any state of the United Sates of America,
(a)
(h)
(C)
% Gti io f�C (`•' _•_ -y ., .; •..._
a110, able 1znlit
Under 10,000 Powidr.l
80 d8(A) ra��asu'red :>� ti C) ect--- -,• _,-
�. i.,tra allo;�able :1z it
Passentier Carer:
78 dnI(A) T C1Dl1Tt CI ai 50 fC� -
nt�viacm a110-4able 1:1mIt
�:otorcycleE, includ:Ln� other vehicles:
E7 d-B(A) Measured at 50 feet r•.a.simu-r a110 �ao1e liaic
1
=CC1tr„ nth
!E- SUR- EEPIENT D1STAL\ICE The standard measurement height for the
enforcement of Section `�.� shall be five {5) feet (1.5 meters)
and horizontal distance from the near edge feet
the traffic lane
monitored to the microphone may be ti-aried from twenty -wive (25)
feet to one hundred (10o) 'feet. The correction factors .given in
the table below shall be applied -to the values given in table
:�•I of Section 4.1
TABLE-
Measurement
ABLE
Measurement
Distance (feet)
25
28
32
35
4o
45
50
56
63
70
80
90
100
Correction to
limits
+6
+5
+4
+3
+2
+1
0
-1
-2
-3
-4
-5
-6
`'F CTION'0 3 Citations ;7henever a sound l -�A
1 meter, read
.'olice officer or the Environmeri1y y
�al Ero:,ection Officer,sh by a trained
hall indicate
m
Y
y it
� J .
-41
b��a� a
c,�'lrlr �S `� L• �er,•i�.20
lie he '�C, °'� h eJ'� �1'�a N� ° thaw ah
v,•prt�`�,;1� 1h be012 C7 s Ar°,
o"YF��'o; foo
cue ,re.X111 �O d��'s�l` oh 0 h, c1 `111
e
L"" e �
co 1;-e
e Zs �, 1o1es `? o Us1 s e`er
�° 12 ee, ar1e o� �s �3, cee�Ur s44
h ry 1Z r �ob 1 h
e 1� �eo2, be D
cess -tr, 0
13�; °r
s e
oh
tier ry �o� �'t °-Q
or re o ', eco3' sh o17
/ des Or eons �1
7� r�
��tl RFU
<o Le
rl �r -601
L
c11�'F� 1O co �yj'jl
I O g
o,? t1 l! I0 a ra 1
Z`,�a �vdys rOvoN 01,
Forth `mac Os.
a ` o� ( ro"�xJ ti � SS. tlr�
Sd� A.� ori f `eh -I
F p1 V lo? ` ut, r ��aysJ� o0(yJa� P1I1'�s cIN
9 c'12V tL o h 3 .I e i s ? h �
acs -<o rE�v �'dys e
°th �o a mid 1�h•
• 1, N1, x''13 ' je .rtl9'
oU�as 4%-0Fo re o 9a I cls
r UN f rihe h�11Q,
�C1es 11m` ays
�"flv� tS go
o2,d.i
y
�I.
y
A
�
nm
D
v
N
A��
C
D
T
Cp
00
n
E
'OR. -MOTOR vhiIICLES
Over 10,GC;J
87 a (A) 1 7:111 C! I�` it 'IG ni'.:1. lm alloNd}JlB It ] t
unc!etr .10,000 p;,unciu
80 d:i(A) m-aasure(I al- JG feet -- r:•S::lTll"iil iillUWilbj j. ,it
(b) Passeati;er Cara:
78 dB(A) neanuiud at 50 feet -- maximum allowable limit
(c) ::otorcyclQc;, includLn{ other vehicles:
E7 d5(A) ne.1811_rcd at 50 feet.-- maximum allowable li:.-tit
1•
P: ZASUREFJE!T DISTANCE The standard measurement height for the
enforcement of Section g.l shall be five (5) feet (1.5 meters),
and 'the horizontal distance from the near edge of the traffic lane
monitored to the microphone may be varied from twenty-five (25)
feet to one hundred (100) feet. The correction factors given in
-the table 5 3, below shall be applied to the values given in table
�1 of Section 4.1
TABLE •1
Measurement
Distance (feet)
25
28
32
35
4o
45
50
56
63
70
80
90
100
Correction to
limits
+6
+5
+4
+3
+2
+1
0
-1
-2
-3
-4
-5
-6
.OTION'��3 Citations '�+henever a sound level meter, read by a trained
,,olice officer or the Environmental Protection Officer, shall indicate
that a mo for - ve??icle =;: _ xn :violation Yof ariy pro ons` of this chapter Y
at
.,.'such citation shal1 'oe 'issued 'orderin th`such motor vehicle be tested
at a site dPai�?:a Led 'by the -Environmental Frotec tion -Officer using ouch.:,;
equipment and p.^.�?�dures.as have been established by the American �iational
Standards Insti_'Ute (ANSI), within five (5) days of the issuance of
such citation to determine in in fact the motor vehicle is in violation
or the provis.i_«ns of this chanter.
If upon such test any motor vehicle is found to be in violation
o -t' any of the provisions of this chapter, the owner or operator shall
have.five (5) days to make, or have made, all necessary corrections to
briny; such motor vehicle into compliance with the provisions of this
chapter, and return such vehicle to the test site for re -testing.
<21q Truck Routes.
The liralts set forth in Section 9.1 apply at all times
for r.-�otor vehicles with a r:.anufacturers gross vehicle
rating of 10,000 pounds or more, when travelling on pre-
scribed truck routes- I'ron Ex) pm to (y)arn, the following day ,
on weekdays, and on (Saturdays), Sundays and legal holidays,
these vehicles will be required to adhere to the lim=ts set
.forth in Section 9.1 for other motor vehicles when travelling
off prescribed truck routes.
n .r•
'EfCTION • �D V1~ HiCLES
v.•aY �.4 V11
round pressure level emit -ted by re:
shall be as provided in tab_
intended to carry persons,. whetherwhether duly registered or not.
.e+Jt3LIC RIGHTS-OF-Viay.;.-The_,maximum :.
icles operated off' public rights -of --way
below. These shall include all vehicles
publicly or privately owned, or
TABLt✓ f.�• `i [ IiICUE I\0 LSE L I f 4 1 T S
Sound Pressure Level
Vehicle class dB (A) at 50 feet
Moteorboat manufactured prior to
1/1/ 75 85
Motor boat manufactured after
1/1/76 76
offhighway vehicles manufactured
before 1/1/75 82
offhighway vehicles manufactured after
1/1/75 78
:,F,C'I'.T_ON U PENALTIES. .Vhenever in any section of this ordinance or
rule or regulation promulgated hereunder, the doing, of any act is
required, prohibited, or declared to be unlawful and no definite fine
or penalty id provided fro a violation thereof, any person, fi �n, or
corporation who shall be convicted of a violation of any such section
shall, for each offense be fined in a sum of not more than 100 dollars
or imprisioned not to exceed 30 days, or both, so fined and imprisoned.
ADDITIONAL RENEW - INJUNCTION. As an additional re;redy for the
Operation or maintenance -o7 any device, instrument, Vehicle or machinery
In Violation of any provision hereof and t.ih' h GdUSeS diSCO1Bi01't Or annoyance
to roasonable persons of normal sensitiveness or ;,hich endangers the coc;fo•rt,
renose, health or- peace of residents in the area shall be dee;red, and is
declared to be a public nuisance and may be subject to abatement su:rmarily
by a restraining order or injunction issued by a court of co;r,patent juris-
diction.
i1ETHOD OF., E?,FORCUIENrl' OF'03DINAP,CEe •
913
�,. Vi ;l'et1o of_this 0rdihbnce 6"tidhich th,61 noise source is
not self -Prod;! led, or if self- propel led, not customarily used or
designed for tr•insportation upon a public right -of -:•gay, shall be
cause for ! lU;'ons and complaints to be issue" i(irthl•lith; provided,
however, that in lieu of summons and cos.plaint enforcement personnel
may issue a 24 -hair notice, or other reasonable amount of time not
to exceed f i ve days , s i fined by the En i ronment 1, Protection
Officer .. - . in writing, which may be served personally or Dy
certified mail to the last known address of the person to whom
addressed, with return receipt request. directed to the o,. -mer,
occupant, person or persons in charge of or in control of the machine,
device, building or other permises to abate said violation of this
0•rdinance. Failure to comply ti•;ith the order so issued and served
shall constitute a violation of this Ordinance.
k5ec,� itn S3 a`r
� Violation of this ordinance in which 'tile noise source is
a motor vehicle as defined in this Ordinance shall be cause for
sum,, -,ions and complaint to be issued forthwith. This subsection small
not apply to machines or devices not customarily used or designed
for transpertation.
Contracts.
Any written agreement, purchase order, or
instrument_ whereby the city is committed to the expenditure
of funds in return for work, labor, services, supplies,
equipment, materials, or any combination of the foregoing,
shall not be entered into unless such agreement, purC.,,--.e
order, or instrument contains provisions requiring that any
equipment or activities which are subject to the provisions
of this cods_, will be operated, constructed, conducted, or
manufactured without causing violation of the code_
[i SEPARABILITY.
If any Section, Subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this
Ordinance is for any reason held invalid'or Unconstitutional by any court of
competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and
inependent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity OF the
rt_z-.wining portions hereof:
�T
-,CTI �; i'�.: LC,� ia0 Ly" s SSTON F'T�C�JUC t5 Am product hick haS_ been
certified by the Administrator of tleiT. S. Environmental D rotection
:
1,~er_cy pursuant to Sec tion 15 of the Poise Control Act of 1972 as
a
low noise e,i ission proiiac ` and ••r_^.ich he determines is suitable for
use
as a substitute, shall be used in Lrefererce to any other product,
'orovided
than such cor-i.i.fi.r.d product has a. procurement cost which is
more than 125 percent.tim o..f the- least expensive type of product for
not
which it is certified as a substi'tut;4.
�3
ttly Dili ic3.�al Co:ie O,r." t1ne
City Of TO 3 � i -Y, Iowa, and any a—ad all ordinancnoOY pai%i1 t7.t f
C0.:i liCi• i�7. ti:1 2".R:1 thio oid-i-ainca are har.�?by rapaajoi.
SECT ICN; EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordizzacc shall be in effect after its
(t -
=1:.a? passage, approval, and. upon roll call t%L ere u-cre:
., AY S:
Brandt
a.LPrc,s�
Caarnacki
FTnit�
M aXOR
ATTEST:
City :acr;c
1st Readies
]rd Raadin
In
and approved this day O
A.D., `q�.
`ATTORN EYS'AT LAW -
,:110 EAST WASHINGTON STREET
IOWA CITY,,IOWA 52240
August 26, 1974'
'JOHNSON COUNTY
Ms. June Kinney AUG 2 81974
Administrative Assistant
Commission on Environmental Quality PLANNING COMMISSION
Johnson County Regional Planning Commission
22 1/2 South Dubuque Street
Iowa City, Iowa ' 52240
Dear Ms. Kinney:
As you: requested in your letter of July 23, 1974, I have reviewed
the proposed noise ordinance under consideration by the Commission
and offer the following comments.
First of all I question the need for the adoption in the City of Iowa
City of such a comprehensive noise ordinance. Many of the existing
ordinances of the City of Iowa City covernoise situations and I think
cover them rather adequately. For example, Section 6. 46. 12 prohibits
excessive motor vehicle noise and contains a number of requirements
with respect to equipment on motor vehicles in connection with noise
emissions. Section 8.10. 18 `of the City Code contains restrictions on
noise emissions from manufacturing' facilities in certain zones of the City.
Adoption of the proposed ordinance would require, it seems to me,
an extensive and expensive noise abatement bureaucracy within the City.
Certainly the noise officer would need to be formally trained and have
considerable qualifications in the engineering and related areas so that
such officer could not only: administer the provisions of the ordinance but
could also establish him or herself as an expert witness for the purposes
of testifying in Court in: noise abatement prosecutions.
Also I suggest to you that enforcement of an ordinance with the
complex regulations that it contains, especially in Sections 7. 1 and
following sections, may well be difficult Bear in mind that to obtain a
criminal conviction under these provisions of the ordinance it will be
necessary to establish beyond a reasonable doubt to a judge or, if
demanded by an. accused, a jury of laypersons, that all of the elements of
the various offenses exist. Although certainly not impossible, I think
that proving a violation of this ordinance wherein it is required to establish
the existence of noise levels by use of extremely technical equipment, the
Lastly some comments of a more specific nature. It seems to me
that Section 4. 1 should be altered to make it clear that all activities of the
officers of the'Environmental Protection Office are subject to the super-
vision and direction of the City; Manager. Certainly, for example,. the
office should not have the power to enter into contracts directly unless the
City Council is willing to considerably alter the Council -Manager form of
government. I question the authority -..of the City to require a private
individual or company to maintain records and make measurements of
noise emissions and -report the same to the City as required in Subsections
6 and 7 of Section 4. 1. Also I question the authority of the City to require
an individual to submit a -vehicle for inspection without arrest, apparently,
as set forth in Section 8'3. Perhaps authority exists in this state for these
activities and I would be happy to be 'made aware of it.
Very truly yours,
Joh W. Hay k
JWH:vb
t
r
TnT„.,o u;,,,,o.,
-..
2”
_ AiimiSt'2R_ 1974..:.._
Lastly some comments of a more specific nature. It seems to me
that Section 4. 1 should be altered to make it clear that all activities of the
officers of the'Environmental Protection Office are subject to the super-
vision and direction of the City; Manager. Certainly, for example,. the
office should not have the power to enter into contracts directly unless the
City Council is willing to considerably alter the Council -Manager form of
government. I question the authority -..of the City to require a private
individual or company to maintain records and make measurements of
noise emissions and -report the same to the City as required in Subsections
6 and 7 of Section 4. 1. Also I question the authority of the City to require
an individual to submit a -vehicle for inspection without arrest, apparently,
as set forth in Section 8'3. Perhaps authority exists in this state for these
activities and I would be happy to be 'made aware of it.
Very truly yours,
Joh W. Hay k
JWH:vb
4r
PLANNPI%,: .MON
August 12, 1974
Johnson County Regional Planning
Commission
222 South Dubuque Street,
Iowa City,'Iowa
Attention: June Kinney
Dear Ms. Kinney:
First of-all,thank you very much for the opportunity
last week to expre'ss Iowa -Illinois Gas And Electric Company's
position concerning th-e.'most recent noise ordinance proposal for
Iowa City. It was a pleasure meeting you and your associates
and I am looking forward to possibly meeting with -the Commission
again in September.. At rate., we appreciate the opportunity
to provide input on this timely subject,— noise and it- control.
From an . environmental standpoint, we essentially agree
with the concept of establishing a noise ordinance provided that
such an ordinance 1, is ma - intained in the proper perspective and
does not become- an improper tool for hidden objectives. Consequent-
ly., we would like to offer the following comments and recommendations
in the attitude of constructive criticisms as aides in developing
a more reasonable and workable regulation. often times an ordinance
may appear sound on the surface5 but once it is passed the effects
turn out to be.devastating and not within the original intent. As
with the previous noise.proposals3 our comments begin with a specific
section by section appraisal of theordinancefollowed by conclusions,
summary and recommendations.
52130V
I
I I
71C'C
- August 12, 1974
Section I: Purpose — ,The term "prevent" in the stated purpose
is somewhat misleading in that only .a small portion of the total
ordinance is geared to:•rard noise prevention. Rather, the result
of the ordinance would appear to, be regulation and control of
noise sources hopefully -achieving a general decrease in overall
noise levels. Itis not possible_ to totally prevent noise, but
controlling and _regulating 2'.s,a feasible objective. Perhaps the
statement of purpose should be reexamined toward that end.
Section II: Definitions and Standards - The -introduction to the
thirty-six 36 definitions e
� ) that follow recognizes that the
American National Standards Institute (ANSI) has already established
many definitions for noise related terms. The indication is that
ANSI must be an authoritative source when it comes to noise and its
meaning. Therefore, it would seem more efficient to utilize ANSI
definitions for the terms`.de;f ined in this section. Since the ANSI
standards are to be used in other sections of the proposal (Section
8.3 for example), confusion_ will result when mixing two different
sets of definitions.
Consider the following regarding some of the definitions
in Section I1•
2. Ambient Noise Level - The definition specifies that
the dB(A) level exceeded 90 percent of the time in a one hour period
is the ambient level. However, we" -would like to indicate that a
value fitting this description -between7 and 8 'a.m. on Monday pro-
bably will not be the same for the following hour. For that matter,
the level recorded this Monday will not be the same as for the exact
same time period on the following.Monday. Thus, this definition
can only result-in`numesous recorded ambient levels. We recommend
that the definition be altered so that a consistent ambient level
will be obtained regardless of the time period in which it is taken.
Perhaps if an ambient value is required for determining whether or
not a particular noise source is in compliance with the ordinance,
the ambient value can be'obtained during a time period established, -
by the noise officer and_` the --operator of the noise source. The
operator may be in.a better position to recognize extraneous or
unusual conditions that would lead to inaccurate values.
8• Emergency Work or Emergency Vehicle— First of all,
we suggest that the;�e two terms be- defined separately. Even though
the 'work' and the vehicle may'oe-used in the same- types of events,
they are still two separate and distinct items which should be in-
dividually°described• Secondly, the terms 'Public calamity) should
perhaps be explicity described in'this section. It seems self-defeat-
ing to define one term using other words that are subject to varying
degrees of individual interpretation.. Such a situation can do nothing
but eventually lead to confusion. e
1
I
I•is Kinney
- August 12, 1974
Section I: Purpose — ,The term "prevent" in the stated purpose
is somewhat misleading in that only .a small portion of the total
ordinance is geared to:•rard noise prevention. Rather, the result
of the ordinance would appear to, be regulation and control of
noise sources hopefully -achieving a general decrease in overall
noise levels. Itis not possible_ to totally prevent noise, but
controlling and _regulating 2'.s,a feasible objective. Perhaps the
statement of purpose should be reexamined toward that end.
Section II: Definitions and Standards - The -introduction to the
thirty-six 36 definitions e
� ) that follow recognizes that the
American National Standards Institute (ANSI) has already established
many definitions for noise related terms. The indication is that
ANSI must be an authoritative source when it comes to noise and its
meaning. Therefore, it would seem more efficient to utilize ANSI
definitions for the terms`.de;f ined in this section. Since the ANSI
standards are to be used in other sections of the proposal (Section
8.3 for example), confusion_ will result when mixing two different
sets of definitions.
Consider the following regarding some of the definitions
in Section I1•
2. Ambient Noise Level - The definition specifies that
the dB(A) level exceeded 90 percent of the time in a one hour period
is the ambient level. However, we" -would like to indicate that a
value fitting this description -between7 and 8 'a.m. on Monday pro-
bably will not be the same for the following hour. For that matter,
the level recorded this Monday will not be the same as for the exact
same time period on the following.Monday. Thus, this definition
can only result-in`numesous recorded ambient levels. We recommend
that the definition be altered so that a consistent ambient level
will be obtained regardless of the time period in which it is taken.
Perhaps if an ambient value is required for determining whether or
not a particular noise source is in compliance with the ordinance,
the ambient value can be'obtained during a time period established, -
by the noise officer and_` the --operator of the noise source. The
operator may be in.a better position to recognize extraneous or
unusual conditions that would lead to inaccurate values.
8• Emergency Work or Emergency Vehicle— First of all,
we suggest that the;�e two terms be- defined separately. Even though
the 'work' and the vehicle may'oe-used in the same- types of events,
they are still two separate and distinct items which should be in-
dividually°described• Secondly, the terms 'Public calamity) should
perhaps be explicity described in'this section. It seems self-defeat-
ing to define one term using other words that are subject to varying
degrees of individual interpretation.. Such a situation can do nothing
but eventually lead to confusion. e
1
I
11. Level, , Day Night - The definition notes that values
recorded at night should be.inereased.by 10 dB(A) before averag-
ing the 24 hour period recordings. Such a procedure may or may
not be accurate depending on the'location of the reading. For in-
stance, in an..area of heavy industrial activity, the dB(A) values
are usually fairly constant 24 hours a day. Thus, increasing the
night values by 10 dB(A) would often give rise to incorrect results.
The definition should allow for consideration of the area in which
the readings .are. taken`.
�� 17. Noise --Use of the terms "psychological or physio-
logical could bring a new dimension to the actual intent of the
noise proposal. The—Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA)
has proposed noise levels to which people can be exposed for
specified time periods without suffering any hearing loss. The OSHA
limits (used in Section 5.2`.17 -of this proposal), then, could per-
haps be used in determining whether or nc•t physiological damage is
likely to occur. Hovever, simple numerical categorization of when .
psychological damage may, occur does not currently exist. Perhaps
the reason for this is`that when=it comes to determining psychological
effects, there are too,many factors specific to each individual to
establish universal values Different lifestyles, interests, and
values are just a few'of:the items which may influence ones suscepta=
bility to a particular noise. Thus, we recommend that the ANTSI de-
finition of noise; be used in this ordinance since that definition is
less likely to be subject to confusion and misinterpretation that results
when dealing with different individuals.
18. Noise Disturbance- Unfortunately, if the definition of
these terms is allowed.,without alteration, the entire ordinance will
be subject to individual interpretation. What constitutes a "normal"
or "reasonable" person-andwho are the "other persons?" "The pur-
pose of the entire project is really to define reasonableness. We are
certain that almost everyone.has been annoyed or disturbed by some
noise at sometime ;in their life..- Some people seem to be bothered more
easily by noise than others A person that is -"normal" and "reason-
able" in every other respect could feasibly be very annoyed by any
sound. Thus, this particular definition probably should be stated
more explicitly.; It will bedifficultto satisfy everyone without
serious repercussions on orderly growth and development. A certain
amount of tempered judgement is required in determining what conditions
constitute a noise problem and this judgement parameter should be
accommodated in the ordinance.
33- -Stationary Noise Source — Including the term "movable"
in this -definition does not seem 'appropriate since a movable object
normally is not stationary. We assume that the intent is to include
�A}ILLIN O1S GAS AND ELECTRIC GOM
such:rancitemeJ-11 a would be �augasoline po ,ered pump • Undoubtedly,
auto^lobiles, trucks, ;Motorcycles and larrnmoviers should not be in-
cluded. Clarification of this definition is suggested.
We have spent a considerable amount of time discussing
the definitions in the proposal. Although vie do not fully agree
with some of the others on which we have not commented, ve feel
that the foregoing are needful of correction. The definition of
terms is fundamer_ta1 to the success If the
of the ordinance.
terms are loosely and poorly defined, the ordinance will have
little substance and will be.difficult to administer.
Section IV: Powers of EPO:- In general, the powers delegated to
the Environmental Protection Office are adequate toe effectaph ively
12
execute the mandates of.the ordinance Hovievej'' portant aspect
concerning education. purposely excludes a very imp p
of the educational goal— ways and methods to abate noise. Perhaps
the reason for such an exclusion is concern that discussion of
noise abatement may directly`or indirectly lead to endorsement of
a particular product designed to decrease
noise. At any rate, the
purpose of the educational program would not be fulfilledeunless
We
noise abatement"techniques are clearly ,and openly p
suggest that the program could be designed in a manner that would
avoid product endorsement.
Next, we call attention to paragraph 4.17 which notes
that measurement of noise levels.may be required by the EPO accord-
ing to established methods and procedures at such times and locations
that are reasonable We believe that the EPO should consult with
the owner or operatorofa given noise source before establishing the
best times and locations fortakingnoise reading. The operator may
know of some unusual operating conditions that could result in non-
typical noise -levels. 1..The drive for 'noise abatement should be a
cooperative effort as much as possible which will assist in making
the ordinance achieve Jts. intent,
Section IV= ?: Duties of the EPO One of the duties of the EPO
is to establish noise .measurement methods which will further the pur-
pose of the proposal. Since the ANSI has already been recognized as
an authoritative -'organization for the subject of noise and since it
is ANSI methods that are to be used when determining moving vehicle
noise levels (Section -8.3), we suggest that ANSI methods be adopted
of the
for other determinations tare only the best
well�tmeeandgfieldeproven meths.
techniques, though tring.
Since noise measurement is dependent on many factors,
measurement methods should be used..
5
11
August 12, 1974
Section V: Noises Prohibited = This particular section outlines
those iter -as and events that coristitute either excessive, unusually
loud or unnecessary noise. We :Mould simply like to point out that
unless each item is.carefully and:explicited defined, confusion
will result when attempting to enforce the ordinance. For example,
section 5.2.2 notes that discharging an exhaust to the open air
except through a muffler in:good repair is an unnecessary noise.
By the same token, then, if a muffler is used and a noise still re-
sults, that noise should be termed necessary and in compliance with
this section. Unfortunately, the _Inecessary' noise may violate the
numerical limits in later sections. Thus, the noise complies with
and violates the proposal. Therefore, we recommend that the ordinance
be so structured that compliance with a given part constitutes com-
pliance with the entire ordinance.
Paragraphs 5.2.12, 5.2.13, and 5.2.16 are simply restate-
ments of 5.2.1, 5.2.6 and 5.2.4 and should be stricken from the
draft.
paragraph 5.2.17 establishes acceptable noise levels and
length of time, of exposure to these .levels for places of public
entertainment First'of all, "Places of Public Entertainment" has
not been defined anr;.,here in the proposal. Unless such places are
identified, it will hs- questionable as to where and when the limits
apply. Secondly, most people that attend an event which will create
noise approaching these levels attend such an event because they
want to. It does not seem, _:appropriate to limit such.a noise when
those attending can merely leave if the levels are bothersome. Con-
sequently, we suggest that.this paragraph also be dropped from the
proposal.
Section VI: Exemptions and Permits — In addition to the items
covered by this section, we suggest that a compliance permit be
made available on a voluntary basis. If a particular noise source
can demonstrate that it complies with the ordinance, then a permit
is issued which expires but can be renewed in five years. in this
manner, anyone can get a permit and remove the doubt about whether
or not his carmotorcycle or for that matter substation complies
with the ordinance. Also, by making this a voluntary permit, Io;•ra
City personnel does not become overwhelmed with paper work as would
result in a mandatory permit situation.
Section VII: Noise Levels by Land Use — Paragraph 7.1 contains
two items which could create problems when attempting to enforce
the ordinance. (1) The phrase "at the property boundary or at
any point within the property affected by the noise..." is dif-
ficult to interpret. It seems to be inferring that a reading can
be taken at a,property line interfacing between two different classes
of lAnd use or within property.line for some unknown reason. In
our opinion, only the property line levels are of use in view of the
ordinance and its purpose.. (2) In cases where a particular noise
source is bounded by.differing land use zones, the ordinance denotes
that the source "i s subject;to the most stringent levels for the vary
ing land uses Such a requirement seems to be much more stringent
proposa-L. jr, a-Lso> -Li.mi-cs ine proper use of Lne -Lana ay ais-
counting any advantage to locating.'a,noise source near a in-
dustrial receiver and away from the residential receiver. For
instance, if a particular property is bounded on two sides by
residence and the other two sides by commercial businesses, the
noise source should be located nearer the businesses. This or-
dinance sees.no`benefit in such anapproach since the most strict—
residential - limits would apply to all sides. We believe it is
more equitable and favor amending this- paragraph to allow for dif-
ferent noise levels commensurate with the land use.
Paragraph 7.2 notes.'that-ambient noise should be "...measured
when the source is quiet..." In the.case of electrical transformers,
sometimes it is unreasonable- or extremely difficult to silence the
noise source — the .transformer— without causing some other adverse
effects. Likewise - even if the noise source is silenced,, there is no
guarantee that the ambient level will remain constant before and after
the source is activated. In fact, the odds are in favor of ambient
noise level fluctuation— usually not due to any individual noise source,'
but rather due to a combination of unrelated events and sources. Con-
sequently, we feel this 'paragraph should be reconsidered and revised.
Paragraph 7.3 makes reference to "pure tone" characteristics
of noise.sources yet does not provide for any method of determining
when a pure tone exists."Pure-tone" has also not -been defined An the
regulation. Therefore. we recommend that either the paragraph be removed
or
It tone" defined and a method. for determining the existence of
same be appropriately defined.
Paragraphs 7.5, 7.63 7 7, 7.8, and 7.9 are all similar in
that some sort of noise level projection will be required before
any action can be taken.. We wish to point out that noise level pro-
jections are often difficult ;to accurately develop because of the many
extenuating factors that contribute to the noise. These paragraphs
should perhaps be reexamined with this'thought in mind.
Section 8; Motor Vehicle'T'Toise Levels Iowa City Officials may find
this portion of the ordinance difficult to enforce relative to vehicles
"just passing through" the city. It.would seem to be inequitable to
require vehicles passing through'the city for the first and perhaps
o_ily'time to comply with the ordinance. Yet, such vehicles fall under
the domain of the ordinance. Even; though the intent of this section
may be to consider only those vehicles frequently in Iowa City, it is
not so stated in the section. Note, for instance, that part of Inter-
state 80 is in the city limits and -would thus be subject to the or-
dinance. Thus,; we recommend that this section be more closely evaluated `
in kterms of its possible total effects.
i
Section 10; Contracts In our view Iowa City will find it
difficult to obtain contractors willing to guarantee that
they will not exceed these-noise.levels.
Section 12; Low Noise Emission Products — We assume that this
section applies only to city owned and purchased products. It would be
difficult to enforce this section' -at - the private citizen or corporate
level. If our assumption is correct, the section needs to be re-
written reflecting such an intent.
We hope our comments herewith provided will be useful in
arriving at an optimum. ordinance. Although we have opted to com-
ment on some aspects that are not directly related to our operation,
we feel that they could be beneficial toward obtaining an overall
objective and reasonable proposal.
Briefly, then, our major recommendations include the
following;
1. Existing sources that are not the subject of.numerous com-
plaints should be specifically exempted from the ordinance.
2. A time delay between passage and enforcement of the ordinance
is vital to allow opportunity to correct noise problems.
3. The ANSI standards should be used whenever possible.
4. Ambiguous terminology should be avoided and intent clarified.
5. The proposal should be .viewed in light of the total effect that
it could have on the city.
Again, we thank you for this opportunity to comment and
we hope to be able to discuss the comments with you on September 4,
1974.
CHG/gb
cc; D. G. Findlay
--K. H. Schafer
Very truly yours,
C: H. Golliher
Electric Engineering Department
I
WHEREAS, Kwik Shop at 1 814 1.047PY T�i7S ra -ino
in Iowa City, Iowa, has surrendered cigarette permit No. 74-26
expiring
June 30 , 19 75 , and requests a refund on the unused portion
thereof, now therefore,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF IOWA CITY, IOWA, that cigarette
permit No. 74-26 issued to James & Marilyn Melend dba/Kwik Shop
be cancelled, and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor and City Clerk be and they are hereby
authorized and directed to draw a warrant on the General Fund in the amount of
$ 75.00 , payable to James & Marilyn Melend
as a refund on cigarette. permit No. 74-26
It was moved by 30DYo0so and seconded by na17-;dcPn that
the Resolution as read be adopted, and upon roll call there were:
AYES: NAYS: ABSENT:
Brandt
Czarnecki
Davidsen X_
deProsse x
White X_
Passed this 17th day of Sept. , 19 74
a-ZE
n
rt
d
0
a: o C�lCb
,
cl
W C- O~o Sx•
. 0-.-••: O -W n
CD c+ a x'
y � C ] n r e✓ . En
CO
w r• Q: o. .a 4 o
p C- t•t• y rt "4 Fz, r rt - i O
C y HI CD f -J. N
�UZ
y w m' n w
g " R
CD Fi.
IM 0
�* O
a m o wPU
C.i _
to -
CD a
O W C -i
p Q
� o
p
_A
ro
H W
M V y
0
c
n
A `
"Wit
'
a
PW
t]
y
�
1•�1
CJ
O
W
C •�++•
'��
�. moi` O (o N e0•i. .:
a-ZE
n
rt
d
0
a: o C�lCb
,
cl
W C- O~o Sx•
. 0-.-••: O -W n
CD c+ a x'
y � C ] n r e✓ . En
CO
w r• Q: o. .a 4 o
p C- t•t• y rt "4 Fz, r rt - i O
C y HI CD f -J. N
�UZ
y w m' n w
g " R
CD Fi.
IM 0
�* O
a m o wPU
C.i _
to -
CD a
O W C -i
p Q
� o
p
_A
ro
H W
M V y
0
c
n
7
uogaadsui o} aaa[gns sawq IIL au
pun 3ggnd eqj jo A%arn . ureid ui apeut aq o; _sc aces aq; . axagm aa[eap aga Aq pal'
sod aq ol Cdoa scgy
"Wit
a
M
t]
y
�
1•�1
*-4K
7
uogaadsui o} aaa[gns sawq IIL au
pun 3ggnd eqj jo A%arn . ureid ui apeut aq o; _sc aces aq; . axagm aa[eap aga Aq pal'
sod aq ol Cdoa scgy
RESOLUTION..NO. 74-415
RESOLUTION TO REFUND BEER PERMIT._
WHEREAS, the Kwik Shop at1814 Lower Muscatine
has surrendered beer permit No. 74-0204 expiring Jan. 27., 1974
and requests a refund.on the unused portion thereof, now therefore,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF.IOWA CITY, IOWA, that said beer
permit be and the same is hereby cancelled, and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor and City Clerk be and they are
hereby authorized and _directed to draw a warrant on the General Fund in the
amount of $ 25.00 payable to the James & Marilyn Melendy
for refund of beer permit No: 74-0204
It was moved by deProsse and seconded by white that
the resolution as read be adopted-, and upon roll call there were:
AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: SIGNED:
X
Brandt
X
Czarnecki
X Davidsen
X deProsse
X White
Passed this 17th day of Sept. 19 74
Signed this day of 19
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY.COUNCIL OF IOWA CITY, IOWA, that a Class
"C" Beer Permit Application'is hereby approved for the following named per-
son or persons at the following described locations:
Dale E. Watt'dba/Watt`s, Food Market, 1603 Muscatine
said approval shall be subject to. any conditions or restrictions hereafter
imposed by ordinance' oic state law.
,oause:a recommendation for approval to be endorsed
The City Clerk shall
upon the application and forward the same together with the license fee,
surety bond and.all other information or documents required to the Iowa Beer
and Liquor Control Dgpartmnt.
It was moved by deProsse and. -seconded by White
that the
Resolution as read be adopted, and upon roll call there were:
AES: NAYS: ABSENT:
Brandt __R
Czarnecki
j)dv--jcjsen
e.rosse
1 e
1 -7th day of Sept. 19 74
Passed this
WHEREAS, the Links
at 1011 Arthur St.
has surrendered beer permit No. 74-0765 -expiringApril 3, 1975
and requests a refund on the unused portion thereof, now therefore,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF_IOWA CITY, IOWA, that said beer
permit be and the same is hereby cancelled, and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor and City Clerk.be and they are
hereby author zed and directed to draw: a warrant on the General Fund in the
75.00 payable to the Ernest Warren Stoppelmoor dba/
amount of $
for refund of beer permit No.
0765 & S-0765774
It was moved by Dcz. Vidsen and seconded by deProsse that
the resolution as read be adopted, and upon roll call there were:
AYES: NAYS:
X
X
X
X
X
ABSENT:
Passed this 17th day of
Signed this day of
SIGNED:
Brandt
Czarnecki
Davidsen
deProsse
White
September 19 74
19
41
®L
WHEREAS, the Links
at 1011 Arthur St.
has surrendered beer permit No. 74-0765 -expiringApril 3, 1975
and requests a refund on the unused portion thereof, now therefore,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF_IOWA CITY, IOWA, that said beer
permit be and the same is hereby cancelled, and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor and City Clerk.be and they are
hereby author zed and directed to draw: a warrant on the General Fund in the
75.00 payable to the Ernest Warren Stoppelmoor dba/
amount of $
for refund of beer permit No.
0765 & S-0765774
It was moved by Dcz. Vidsen and seconded by deProsse that
the resolution as read be adopted, and upon roll call there were:
AYES: NAYS:
X
X
X
X
X
ABSENT:
Passed this 17th day of
Signed this day of
SIGNED:
Brandt
Czarnecki
Davidsen
deProsse
White
September 19 74
19
.. .. .......
'o >
Ca
CD
OQ
4
(t) v
0
CD
cr
CD
rt
:0. N,
rr
CD
0
pq*
rr
cl,
CD
ca
E3
rt
:03
REGION VII
Room 300 Federal Office Budding
911 Wetnut Street
Kansas City. Missouri 64106
S J
L
Y h
CM1..vfl
t ♦ t
RJj
.
ENT OF HOUSING AND UR13AN
DEVELOPMENT
-
OMAHA AREA OFFICES
UNIVAC BUILDING 7100 WEST CENTER
ROAD
---.
-: OMAHA, NEBRASKA 68106 -
-
September 12, 1974
Mr. John B. Klaus
Director
Department .of Urban Renewal
410 East Washington
Iowa City, Iowa 52240
Dear Mr. Klaus:
IN REPLY HEFER TOt
7.2PMT (IA --R-14,
E. E. Breese,
Parcel 93-4)
This office has reviwed subject documantation and finds it acceptable
provided that `ths disposiltion contract is fully executed within
two (2).months_and all land conveyed within three (3) months from
the date of this letter.
The Redeveloper's Statement for Public Disclosure was reviewed and
we have no objection to your selected developer.
We concur in your Authority's.determination that the proposed disposition
price for the subject.property, as shown below, is not less than fair
value for use in accordance -with applicable controls.
Proclaimed Price
Parcel Sq. Ft. Area Total Per Sq. Ft. Reuse
93-4 7,000 $26,950 $3,85 Commercial
Sincerely, •
'Wilitam A. Lorenz
Program Manager
cc: Honorable Edgar Czarnecki
_f=
E
K]
Mr. John ll. Klaus
Director
Department of Urban Renewal
410 East Washington
Iowa City, Iowa 52240
Dear Hr. Klaus:
IN REPLY REFER TOI
7.2PML (Iol-ya R•-14,
Final Determination
Rmasell Mann)
This is to inform you that the Omaha Area Office has determined Mr. Mann
to be eligible for the "iu'lisu of,peymsnt" according to the Uniform
Relocation Act` of 1970, HUD Handbook 1371.1; `Chapter 6, Section 5,
Paragraph 88.
You should proceed .to make payment according to the above HUD mentioned
guidelines. Under no circumstances should this decision regarding
the case of Mr. Mann be looked upon as a &moral decision for other
displaeees who might feel that they too should be eligible for the
"in lieu of payment:`'
The decision concerning Mr. Mann was.based solely on information
furnished in connection with his appeal.
Should you.have any further questions regarding this matter, please
feel free to contact tthis `office.
Birch
L-Ax7a'a Director
cc: Honorable Ed&ar Caarnecki
M
I
$t { a Y
t'p"?
11(111ti1N(.*/1NU ltltll/1N 1)I'
{A '
+UMAl1A ANI rUt i Ct` - ,
UNI C OUIIDING 1100 WES1 CENiCR ROAD
-b,e+�
�
'L�,'
OMAHA, RIEBRASKA 65106
a�iF.
REGION VII
Building
-
September :12,
R......300 Federal office
931 walnut Street
Kanu• City. Ni.fotvt 64106
E
K]
Mr. John ll. Klaus
Director
Department of Urban Renewal
410 East Washington
Iowa City, Iowa 52240
Dear Hr. Klaus:
IN REPLY REFER TOI
7.2PML (Iol-ya R•-14,
Final Determination
Rmasell Mann)
This is to inform you that the Omaha Area Office has determined Mr. Mann
to be eligible for the "iu'lisu of,peymsnt" according to the Uniform
Relocation Act` of 1970, HUD Handbook 1371.1; `Chapter 6, Section 5,
Paragraph 88.
You should proceed .to make payment according to the above HUD mentioned
guidelines. Under no circumstances should this decision regarding
the case of Mr. Mann be looked upon as a &moral decision for other
displaeees who might feel that they too should be eligible for the
"in lieu of payment:`'
The decision concerning Mr. Mann was.based solely on information
furnished in connection with his appeal.
Should you.have any further questions regarding this matter, please
feel free to contact tthis `office.
Birch
L-Ax7a'a Director
cc: Honorable Ed&ar Caarnecki
M
I
E
N
Off Ice of the
City Manager
141
t
1... t
.n ..
September 10, 1974
To: Mayors and Managers,Large Cities , Section
Executive.Director, League of Iowa Municipalities
From: Mayor George.A. Cole, Sioux Cjty
Subject: Meeting in Sioux City, September 20, 1974
Plans are firm now for the September 20 workshop and it appears we
will have a fairly representative group. The meeting will be held
at the Aventino Hotel, Sixth and Nebraska Streets. A block of 20
rooms has been tentatively reserved `fo.r-Thursday and Friday for
those requiring overnight:accomodations. Reservation cards are
enclosed for your convenience.
There was not enough interest in the proposed evening activities,
so the day's program will run from 9:00 a.m: to 5:00 p.m. Costs
will be $6.00 per person.
I visited with Bob Josten late last week and he stressed that the
workshop emphasiswill beondeveloping,a comprehensive policy
statement, based -on the `large;cities''perspective. So that we can
accomplish this.;goal, he.asks'that you review, with your entire
council, the contents of 'the first draft League Policy Statement
which you received in mid-August.
We are planning to devote,approximately,three hours to small group
discussions on the key elements of our legislative program, as well
as any new -elements introduced. Each.small group will report back
to the entire workshop and,'through a discussion coordinator, we
hope to draw together a consensus statement. It is vitally impor-
tant that your city.be represented.at the meeting and that those
representatives have reviewed the draft policy statement so they
are prepared to discuss -each item.
There is a lot of_ground.to cover on the 20th and we need everyone's
input. Please remind yourcouncil members of the meeting and come
prepared to work. We are,looking forward to a productive session.
Si rely,
Co
712/279,-6102
, i b�' fi i t'
• � ra
cir ol= Iowac»n
: r No A 2119ffiz
SERVIMAEQUrr
IOWA CITY. IOWA
14
AM ��
Time PM
How Received:/hone! ❑ Latter In Person ❑ �. Dear Resident, Thank you for calling this matter
to our attention. Please cell 354 1800 11 you
Received by [�.aa.cc
i We welcome your Inquiries
Referred to
on the first
Citizen Notification
of Disposition:
have any quest ons.
d ,N�atiJ Phone
and are always at your service.
Dca =ec
Disposition s ea of Linn Street is swe t
o y of each month The I -street sweeping operation commences at 3:00 a.m.,
at
un UL
Det _ B_
None This Form Phone
❑ Personal Visit ❑
.� , ❑ Letter ❑
BY ( gneture and Ita)
DEPARTMENT HEAD
CITY
IOWA CITY No. A 472
SERVICE REQUEST
.OF
IOWA CITY, IOWA
Antic
May f3, 1974 Time 3'30
PM
Data
Phone ❑ Letter ❑ : in Person ®
Dear Resident: Thank you for calling this matter
How Received:
to our attention. Please call 354-1800 if you
Received by Cit Manager
71
have any questions. We welcome your inquiries
Noma f'ounmerosse dP
Phone
and are always at your service.
-------------------
Address
is about curb cuts on gochester Street to allow bicycles
Reques The Councilwoman concerned
to the intersection
side
of Rochester, from 1st Avenue west
e north
—aef
wh r we had received requests for curb cuts
n the walks in this area nr not.
A bike trail plan
public Works
Referred to _
Disposition comprehensive
I would suggest that
will be available in'the near.future:for
s Council consideration.
is
any further curb cuttifig be delayed until
such time as the comnrg mndse >11an adopted.
Date
54M74 —BY
ADcitizenNotificationNone This Form ❑
❑
Phone ❑ Letter ❑ Personal Visit ❑
of Disposition:
Date By
( igna ure and Title)
DEPARTMENT HEAD
zx
{ �f
SERVICE REQUEST
r ' CrrY of town clot No A 216 2
IOWA :CITY IOWA f'
- "' ? ._� •kc. v' moi! uA� {t erI '� S`r, .2It
w
note .—;zeptCAlbCr_ 4sI_i.9-%i---- Time = PM
�ow Recewwl: t•Irone Letter ❑ In Person..rJ Doan Ro:idoul: thank you lm callmlt this nmihn
11y,)
Received by ----may S. WE+11 -. _ _ to our attention. Please call :1511.1800 it you
Name Carinni lman White __Phone have any questions. We welcome your inquiries
and are always of your service.
Request weeds at N E corner of 5th & Frien.dship-need to be cut. Also a new tree
. - — (tae •
Date September 4, 1974 By loan
Citizen Notification None. ❑ This Fotm ❑ ❑ Lettef ❑ Persona V15i1
of Dis osition: -- • � --
Date1:5 By 11-CDl
( gnatum and t e)
DEPARTMENT H D
SERVICE REQUEST
How
Received
am
Address
---
Request
Referred
CITY OF IOWACITY
Date
®
Citizen Notification
None ❑ Tyis Form
❑ hone ❑
Letter ❑
of Dispos'tion:
Dat
G
By
31
Srgnatr
DEPARTMENT
HEI
No.A 980
Dear Resident: Thank you for calling this matter
to our attention. Please call 354.1800 If you
have any questions. We welcome your inquiries
and are always at your service.
Visit
C
W
C.0
—1
111:
v
�P
N
n
rt
'rt.N t0
"m .
(D
b
:1.Hrar
W
W
N•
m
m
M
C r
w
,d ,<
H
C
M N
rrtq -
H n..
9,...
J
r
O m
O
O
N
0
rt a
M N
Ul
11
tn
m m
Nrt
rt
rt w rt
•C K
^I
rt
rt
n NE o ro
O K (D
N
x
Km
oK''C
m�o.mO
NOE,•
.:.
KNO �O
It
O G OWMO O
m
O
0
H,(D
0,
O
0
p-, -4
m
o
CY
r 7 rt N
r r m 7 rr N 75' N-'�
N O_
N P.F•.'m
O-
gg
rt m
r
m
K
0:m'
r x,
m
m
? r• N
Mm b'
4
b K
m tl-m
Na-tn
7- r
W •.O
J
m
-K O
m rt
(t fi_:
f) m
N p. r'
�Y
rt 5
�
w 9
O
t$ N.
0
P. pr
m (n (D �
b
a W
7
"..
. K O
m m M
Km
p+:. m:
a
rt O
:3O
p.
N
:3 (D
m P.
to K
Wa
rtrNO
w ;:I
P)
H. :3
rt
:3
p
O
r
N C O
m-
O
a K
N• rt
-.O
r -::O -.
-"N -:-
0
rrtrt N:..
rN (D W
H
N O.H .-O 1'.
"7.i P -n 0
o a
O
O
rt
O rt"
9-W
rOt
m
rnt
WG
OKN
-Oto
No' -,7
---�.
,M
N"
-..D M
O
0
p.
d
W W Y• m N
rte•- 7
�-r)
m a
O
K "<
m�
: ::r rOrrrtt N
e rt%nto
..9
o
p,a
-H.
t�r
•C
O O
to a rt
. O"IN
.rt.
oaro
O
G a
.a.m
n
0
O
N
rt rt
m K
r•
rK
N r•
F'• m G
rt
'O
r•
0iO
F..
�$G
N rt
.
O
O N O
m
n
p
'Grr
a
'G
Ort
-
a
N
r
Pi
0
W n
N m .7
a m
0=m
0
m
r
N 0 td
m
t$ P.
o
E
b
rNrit�
m
n to
K
�
N
�
H.
m_
rt
�
moon
w
H
CD
v0.
N
r
r
N
J
J 1
N r
tJ
t0
n,
N.
J
v
J
G�
F..
m P. O MO; H•
0
rt
r
0 As
n
Lo
to
m
w
c m:a w
O, a+,
K
ii
K
K w r K
B
t,aW<
m: . . r N
Ln
N
r
p
C
W
C.0
—1
111:
v
�P
N
n
rt
'rt.N t0
"m .
(D
b
:1.Hrar
tGroT
D
N•
m
m
M
C r
w
,d ,<
H
C
M N
rrtq -
H n..
9,...
C
W
C.0
—1
111:
tn ,
n
rt
a rt to
"m .
(D
b
:1.Hrar
tGroT
(T
N•
m
m
m r,0
C r
w
,d ,<
H
C
F,
rrtq -
H n..
9,...
J
r
O m
O
O
N
0
rt a
M N
'ft
m m
Nrt
rt
rt w rt
•C K
^I
rt
O
O K (D
N
m
r• a
a rt
W-
It
ro
ro
� n
Fl- o
O
C
::$
m
C)..N O rt 0-
N
N
N O_
fD
pi,
a
O•
(D
W.(D ro
b K
d
w N
\r O
m rt
o(D
N p. r'
O
N'�'
O I
M.P..
.
.
"..
G 7 I••• rt
U)
(D
0
(D
,n
a
O,
.21
O
r
cn :3
rN (D W
Km
o a
:
rt
�
(D 0
0
W.
�-r)
:3
' O W m lP
t0:
C
W
C.0
—1
111:
tn ,
rt
a rt to
"m .
w o
b
:1.Hrar
�
(T
N•
m
N
w
w
w
,d ,<
C
F,
E
rt
r -
J
r
O m
(DaEl
0
M N
'ft
Nrt
O
rr
^I
rt
D NO
0
C
H w
N
m
:3
a rt
W-
It
F.,_
4P-rtK m (D
Fl- o
O
C
::$
C)..N O rt 0-
N
r
N -
riO
pi,
a
(D
0
d
w N
m`ararW
o(D
N .._0
N'�'
O I
C
W
C.0
—1
111:
tn ,
rt
a rt to
"m .
r• t�
(D
:1.Hrar
�
(T
N•
m
N
K
w
C
F,
E
�
r -
J
r
CD �t:,
DATE
J J
RECEIVED
N N
ro I ro
Rt �
N N
og
m�
TIME
REQUIRED
PRIORITY
0
O
C
Z
0
r
m
K
cn
a rt to
"m .
r• t�
'�
:1.Hrar
too
w
N
P.
°. CDP) " m
m
0)
m
�PpS
M N
'ft
7� N
0
O "li_
O
w
^I
rt
D NO
0
C
C
- r ft $ ti
W-
P.
m
4P-rtK m (D
G
O
C
P.
C)..N O rt 0-
rt
r
N -
t4
pi,
(D
0
d
b
m`ararW
ro
N .._0
N'�'
M.P..
.
.
"..
G 7 I••• rt
U)
(D
0
(D
,n
a
O,
O
r
rN (D W
Km
:
rt
W.
�-r)
:3
' O W m lP
t0:
og
m�
TIME
REQUIRED
PRIORITY
0
O
C
Z
0
r
m
K
cn
PROJECT
Al,
NUMBE,
CD
m.
01)
-W
tl)
Ln
ON
1-3
0 t-, :4 -
L
-h'tn
fD
(n
o
ct
m
o,
w
M
m
CD
(D�-
-,tj
tr. m
0a
(D
m
0
X
to
0
Fl
W
In
(D
p- su
tr
0
13
rt,
CL'En
H.
M
(D
w rt, rr
0 l< P,
'a
N
"
F'
W.
w
r-
k�&
r•.m rt,
aj,p)
rt.
H. 0
0
(D
<
(D
0-
:j
m rt,
rt,
SIP
fD
0
:3
m
::j " M M
1--.
rt,
(D
to
W
pu to
EI) (D
0 P.
rt
" tn
•n
to
pi rt K. tj
rt'
(D
En
rt,
0
0
rt
P-
H. 0 0
1,-
G
(1)
0
rt
tl- (D
0 P.
�zi
(L :3
(D
:_j
w
Irj
n
0
0
Vb
M M n
M
U)
0
0
m 0
to
(D
Fs
qfl
En 0
0
rt
rt
0
(D
H
0
c:
0
0
RI
ti
(D
w
"
m rt. 0
C 0
CO
0m
M
0
0
t3r
P.
P- rt
ti
pl
(D
ti H-
C)
C:
ui
0
:4
0 m ru
:j
.0
0
14
to
:j
(D
0
to
0 su
(n
%Q
H. 0
H
0,
:c
13,
M
U)
m
::r
0)
" I -h
to
H
:J, 0)
LQ :3 -
0)
Z
(D
0
U)
p)
H m
rt,
(D
el
0
:3
0
(D
%Q
su 0 W
0
ct
1-4
0 1
m
rt 0 su
"0
It
rt
t -h
0
.0
iv
0
�00
ED
1--
a.
(D
rt
0
Lo
0
En
su 0
F.
C6
rt,
Pi
w
;u
tJ
:3
(D�
ID
x
Q,
Il
m
:1
4
to p-
FJ
rt
to
H
-h
In t -h
Ln
N.
.4
U)
�1 0
(D
0
t
0
c°
I'a CL
n
ass
rn
O
CD
LO.0
:jW.
rt,
0
F'
DATE
0
J�
Nkr
w
w
ON
RECEIVED
-j
-j
w
-j
Li
Z
C)
r)
4 R, r
7a
n n n'C)
0 tid
m
rt
r
r, m
III C4 tQ
1-i
rt rt. rt
l< L<
rt
.<
rt,
rt rt N
-n
el
(D
rtn
(D
•l<
--I m
U)
H'�60
0
LQ F,
kQ
to
rt La
01)
rt
0
(D
r)'
rt
rr
rt
0
ft
z
CA
ESTIMATED
0
TIME
REQUIRE
PRIORITY
tn :c
fD
t -h
O W7
C)
(D
0
ND
ft
P. 0)1—rt
.
z
v
CD
0
0:3
(D
0
by
0 U) 0,
K
Fl-
rt tort
1
(D
(D
rt, () rt -
0 (D Fl"<
rt
CL
En 9)
H- (D I -h
rt
to rt,
K
(D
UI
(1) :3 P*rt
:3,
:c
(n l<
0
NJ
Ft
U)
ko 0
too
P.
M r-3 CD
m
(n
rt,
I'a 0
z
IT
U)
k
1-0 ta,
rLt rt
0,
L A)
::r
0) 0.
:C (D
. k<
m
0
rl)• :3
1 1-3
0w
to
(D 0 W
ran'
cn
rr
(D
I �g :3
0
la,
(D
ru
0 F'
x
0
cn
Li m
"ct
U)
rt
0
0) (D —
:3 £m
rt ti su U.)
t -h
>
L-4
(D
su 0 (D
oj Q,
rt, t -b t h
0roCD
0 En 0
Fl
0 0
0 (D
cn
(D
■
771
"
PROJECT
co
NUMBER
n
w.
to .
r
m
$
k
?d
0
<
to 1
a '0 10.
• rt
pa.;:.
to '_;0
;v
�: rt .
v � -.
h1 b ;v
OZ
�
m
m(D
r
a
n
W
3
p O
A. N0
k0
H.
<
�< m
to ',q
O,
w
k
a
m
rt
a. m m
G. k .q
<
P.
V
U)
rt
to
G
,q
G
a
to
w
(D ..
Vl .. -
to
O
m :rt.
G
m' m
LL
til :.
M
H.
rt'
t•' rt r- --
'C m.
(D
k
to
(D
N
Rl
r
a
m
to
to
11.0
7
r
n. H.
O tY -
m
K.
OrK....
rtM
3 N
a ..
t...
P..
O-
b to
O 0 r:
t -b
K
m
rt
w
rt
M�<-
r•
O
n
G.N•
O r
rt
<<
al
t-•
O
rt
n.O
Ga
tj
G ti.
k0
m
k
J
O
rt
O
n
a
O
o
a
rt
rt P.
L< rt
�:
rt.
th
0
O
--t11
t7
P.
K
r 1-A':-
Ul O O
- o
rt
q.
N•
!/�
V
rt
to
rt
1'•
`<
rt
0
i0
m
m r
Ht•
N
o
O
m
o
og
o
(D
o
rt
o
.a
0)
m
m
0o
ny
a
F•,
N
r
(D
nrt
0Wt-h
r0
to
T
9
K
`�
G
m_N_rt-
H.
m
r•
rt:
C.
�O
v
C
E
O
'<
t7l
n rt-
m
£
m
k -_
m
W
o
- rat
H.�.
�
(rD
� a
m
r•
m
'p
rt
a
O
p(Ur N
O
N
7c'
rt
n
m H.
m9
-.
'.
F+-
W
P.
O
m
m
rt
. N.
N o .
W
-.
til
$
(D
tat
CJ
a<�
_ rt
H.
M. M
Y- O
W
''< -
mw
�
ratty
to
a
v
£
1r�H
tl
toff
N
(D
x
tfi ...
N
rTl
k
O .
� .
z
to
L,
�;
�,
i,
`_J
N
DATE
N
N
,
N
N
�.
r
a
r
a
w
o
RECEIVED
II
J
I
�I
J
li
J
�l
�P
A
-1i
Z
zr)
mP.
rt
,<
rt.
o
0 rt.
r- •<
rt
•<
-rt K
L< o
rt
•<
n rt-
11. �<
r
(D
rt K
L< n
.n
-i IT7
w
w
osr
o
m
w
w m
..
rt K
O
O
_
rt.
N•
v g
Z
J
C.p
m
-
r
ESTIMATE
TIME
REQUIRED
rn
PRIORITY
w
m'o
a
w (D:
o
ol
ort
c
a',Mw
M(D
o0
m
rt L<
N•
N, b a
k to
m rt
0
N
- m 0
P.
-.m r
U) :3
_
rt
rt w rt
O m
N.
W
N
a s
t3
to
L4
rt_a rt
5 O
N W
r
E
H.
w
row
O
k
rr
rt
m
,m rt
N m o
z
c
o n
ft
to
O.
tin
E
� t'•
N a
t0
cn
~
ft
o
P.
X
d
rt
H 0
tt
M
Cn
rt
rt
D
O
M
m
�.�fD
0 _N
C
W
-
N.
K
'A
u,
-
..
w
■
� S 3'• F F .1 p _
- t �
J
w
N w. - N
al
w O
O
rt
0 0
N a
O Vi
K a
P. (D
o Q,
z
rat rail
0 0
a
F-
0 O
K
C
co
DATE
RECEIVED
09
v
m�
TIME
REQUIRED
PRIORITY
O
C
Z
n
llilli-
■
0.
J
O -
M
K
to 'n
old
M
d
O
fi
m ''
N
ryt
m
m
m
rr r•
o w
o
m
tn
m
o
f
C
m
a
m
o
m a.
c� �' o
c v,
r- .
K
m
m
K '.
a
m
t-%
N
H
K
lY
m
rt K
0
N
m
m
m o
W
x
m10
rt
r
7
ka
z
0)(�
y
tri
r.
rt m by
-.- m
70
(D
0
0
to
p-
-
rt
O 3
O
M r•
-
K
En
� �
O
n
z rrm
.o
G
w m
as m
w7WK
r•:g
: O
r•
`
w
(p
H
m
F r K W t7
rt.
(D
W
W
rt
9
�C
h]
W
rNt
w mm
N
S�H.
N.
Y. p
rr
0�
O
rt,
allo
r•
.a n
KO
N
W
P. rt
r
°
x
Ln
rt
P. 0
O.`
: rt,
o
ro
G a z rrt
En by cr m
a
x
Omo•
n m CL 0)
ro m�
a
I--
CYN
p
ai
G w rt,
w
r
od
Y. p4 ?a
m M K C
F:
'C
m
a
I H.
m m o
Lf j
O
a
K
t
vet
co
Q
Ln
Ul
W
to
- r
-. f.+_
N
,p
A
C) r
ro
rr
rt
a
rr W
rt K
W_
K
rt W
K
K
K
ct
K
CD
�.O N
K (MD
rt
N n _
N
r
ct
w .
y w
P-
m
It
m
to C
t00 O
m
(D Nrt
O r
_
m
rt -
o el
::s
:j
0
o�
n
(D
`3
O N
O
a
°
o
t3 0
o
0
r•
N
H•
ft
L< .
_.
tv
w O
O
rt
0 0
N a
O Vi
K a
P. (D
o Q,
z
rat rail
0 0
a
F-
0 O
K
C
co
DATE
RECEIVED
09
v
m�
TIME
REQUIRED
PRIORITY
O
C
Z
n
llilli-
■
0.
J
O -
O
K
O
rt
O
w O
O
rt
0 0
N a
O Vi
K a
P. (D
o Q,
z
rat rail
0 0
a
F-
0 O
K
C
co
DATE
RECEIVED
09
v
m�
TIME
REQUIRED
PRIORITY
O
C
Z
n
llilli-
■
t��-1�a iS-.�YF YlY �4: = r
t -•c
� 15 �R._
Y
IRW
i
<;
PROJECT
A'
'.NUMBER
��N�
��
ztN
o-
"
-
ko
=:
w m
a
m
m
o
;m
r m m
0•0 m
G
w.
rt,m.
m ,£ rt
V po�� r
0.
O N
rt
N
�
K
rt-
n
O W ti
0:_mK
N TE
0
rt
r-
O• W
M z
"
rt- 0
rt
F'
ro
rt
N rt : tj .
c, rt (KD"
- to N to
- G1 rt
N
rt
O
K -
c/) /�1
ti: m a
Ln I
N o
rt
o
V�
En
r(D" t$
m�A
rt ray
N�
C
_N
W
:o K in
G
C
m
m
C
%
T
F•'
W N
K
H 1'• 1'-
ti rt
O m m
it 7
K-rS
rt �'
m
ro
W
C.
- G
p�
9 g-,
w
N'- -
t7
0 P P
to a.
T
ti
�
. :j �
to N m
- N
3
N
to
(DD
.0.
0+-
K7 P
K O m
G
rt
w
K
` J
`J'
ro
.rr
N P.
K a
O K W
O w rt
G
n
N
K
m
a
_I
K
u.
.0
N N
rt m
_' ft
"G
a
rt
rt
G
rwrto
r0
m K m
o
W
r
�.rt.
�-
W
�
rt
(DD :
ort
O
-
a
x
nw
w
2
rt
t o-
o
to
kD
CC)
co
co
ao
DATE
N
N
RECEIVED
J
.p
IP
J
J
o m m
rt:
rt
rt
rt
rrr
in. E
�' a
s
O
`°
rt
cg
mm
ESTIMATED
-
TIME
REQUIRED
PRIORITY
oro
m
7d
^
n
rt
r -O
00'
7
G m
a
rt Z
m
a �
w
K
rt,
D
s �
a
n C
x
0
m
Z
Z
a
w
m
rLp, r=
TO:
FROM:
RE:
City Council Members
Ray S. Wells,- City Manager
Informal Council Sessions -
DATE: September 13, 1974
The following topics have been scheduled for informal Council sessions:
September 16,'1974 -- 8:45 A.M.
Meeting -with executive search_consultant'regarding the search for a
City Manager.
September 7, 1974 -- 4.00 P.M. --'Davis Building Conference Room
h A .en t -f
1. Discussion of Housing and Community Development Act of 1974.
2. Discussion.of "Five -Year Transit Improvement Program.'.'
3. Discussion of pending items.
September 23,:1974-- 4:00 P.M. (Monday)
1. Review of Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the VA Parking Ramp.
September 24, 1974 -- 4:00 P.M. (Tuesday) `
1. Discussion of Urban Observatory Program application.
2. Discussion of letter from Sarah Fox, Chairperson, Parks & Recreation
Commission.
V
September 25f 1974 -- 7:30 P.M. (Wednesday)
1. Public meeting regarding the Housing and community Development Act of 1974.
October 1, 1974 -- 4:00 P.M. (Tuesday)
1. Executivesession to discuss appointments to the Johnson County Regional
Planning Commission and the Board of Electrical Examiners.
cernincr the: num
W
E:d",.*`Stene,
E-:did-:not- see: their role
Z1.
X
ncill���-,,i4biild,.:cbntinue;the
selection I of -4,City Manager,
S'x*,,on'*--f 6r;,Councilwoman
informalty session
City
_Counci
9,� 0
f -�1974., 0. A. in the
-0 �Septeinber,4
-cj:t&!,C6nt6r. 4!U_'Counci members,.
ase"n'.,j, dePross�e�;-�, White
Davi -
;Cz.sriiecki`;' .
resent }? Y'1dk`St61
Iowa -C
d' resource con-
on the 15th day -
ants t&,interview.,j Mr. Reaune
Conference. -1 --Room
Ll,,7allbe qualif led with the
Brand
tInput•:. f rom.. people - they
presen
StaTf:,4nem_bers-.4p
an - advisor- to
Paul,-, Reaune, _,.Ca,
:mnagement-by objectives;
va
sultantsFran.O
r a I s a* . guider to,,evaluating
z
acure Xn 1-his.,;Own- thinking,
Mayor
iona,1.1'ie,'_th67..a IternatiVes
nic e 3 ce of aeliv-
_mpor an
cusslon on,--crtx
and sumn
Mayor:`s: summary of.
Davidse (Att
t;'�they ' were . mo I st.in-
--operation.
"'I.ttoncerninq
ndividual7has.
sen i,,sugg I ested
to in `this --at --tt.
cernincr the: num
noted that the..:
skil!sL-'.that COW
was 16f tL
n uTrLb e r
consultant.advL
as -g
f eS s.L
-onal';: staffnatIvesi.,,an Asa,
theCity.. Manage:
communTcation.b
be worked on
Discussion
managerial- bhil
cope :with :-trans
in makinq of,de
,.would
a I n t ry
.1
of. pp 1 ic"
st- group wi
i:l.. has, -:expr
pen r.-_, Conqe
in
E:d",.*`Stene,
E-:did-:not- see: their role
Z1.
X
ncill���-,,i4biild,.:cbntinue;the
selection I of -4,City Manager,
S'x*,,on'*--f 6r;,Councilwoman
informalty session
City
_Counci
9,� 0
f -�1974., 0. A. in the
-0 �Septeinber,4
-cj:t&!,C6nt6r. 4!U_'Counci members,.
ase"n'.,j, dePross�e�;-�, White
Davi -
;Cz.sriiecki`;' .
resent }? Y'1dk`St61
d' resource con-
noted that the..:
skil!sL-'.that COW
was 16f tL
n uTrLb e r
consultant.advL
as -g
f eS s.L
-onal';: staffnatIvesi.,,an Asa,
theCity.. Manage:
communTcation.b
be worked on
Discussion
managerial- bhil
cope :with :-trans
in makinq of,de
,.would
a I n t ry
.1
of. pp 1 ic"
st- group wi
i:l.. has, -:expr
pen r.-_, Conqe
in
E:d",.*`Stene,
E-:did-:not- see: their role
,Ion,proce s s The 'pro=
ncill���-,,i4biild,.:cbntinue;the
selection I of -4,City Manager,
S'x*,,on'*--f 6r;,Councilwoman
.k.scus
--t6-.,,be�,,assured that the
[Ueste(l;.,.z';c6lihci-1,v7dman- David-.'
>e up to the Council ascer-
-to
Lew _:After !-'discussion - co
ants t&,interview.,j Mr. Reaune
Ll,,7allbe qualif led with the
Viandano,ttie in
inN
twden, Councxi,;`-il
included "staf f
sophy:-i.,.And,;,abj_l.
t3l.6 n;,;'department
q
when alterriatives are:'
nicalm;f act ual:_inf6rixiati0n=
are representing; the: :C 3
Council, supplier :-,,bf�..'info:
Dr- r_
::Stene' quesxonst'-��. o,
WD ic
antso,
his_:analysis�r, andiability,
pre w sented by dep Artment.
ery-services: 1
w� The final
for
-.-desire
Staf f."Comments, the
E-:did-:not- see: their role
,Ion,proce s s The 'pro=
�ey:.-shouldalter-
6sented throug h
..pr_:develop
ilved in political issues
Lnagerand Staff should
Idptiabil" ity -to :a different:
y_,.f6r:_-Ci.ty manager to
h6�ads:-'being invo lved
;-.r:responsible; whether
recommendation by
+Counch weighing tech-
tInput•:. f rom.. people - they
an - advisor- to
:mnagement-by objectives;
va
r a I s a* . guider to,,evaluating
acure Xn 1-his.,;Own- thinking,
iona,1.1'ie,'_th67..a IternatiVes
nic e 3 ce of aeliv-
_mpor an
Mayor:`s: summary of.
t;'�they ' were . mo I st.in-
--operation.
_ >< •.'.}'..�<.�t),yi: .i[-[ `i-�„r., �[L^S�Y I.�}1�� �,Vg... A;,'1 'v. .:..y z,. ..0 • w -i .i W
i J Ti c 1 r •y ��4 xt tf r iV if z �`
.•mak - a".._r-Y` f 4 cf>, f f `="'+ti��l -`! moi^ 3- � C i V4 � 1
• _ - r k Y t ti. � i J C�. )i l 'F' x 'ina�'auT rQ .w. '�w..�f? 4a 5.,.-,
. e T --. J i � �) r 'L .f 'Fx 7 j �`•i � u J 3 ri v, rY �t'� _
,Council Discussion y y �`�..•;�
Eage 2s. Y h dtn rii 3f is j•ri u u F ?
Council then-'discussed the=importance of Public
Reaations, jdecxsionsj:being made on what' s_-:best for the
.f
C' a
ity,,, chieving'goals'as determined by: Council without
personal involvement; lengtho_f.•service; relationship
of- Manager.-to':boards�and commissions;. timetable for
replacement and 6xtent'of-advertising:•
Councilman White cited other. --areas of:concern as'
Urban;Renewal`, Service--Center,'`bond issues;': Joint Law En
for cement Building and` the -Library Mass-Transit, and
it'.was -.noted that.a ,.comparison-�of.; the ;:first,. Capital ,Improve
meets Program presented with'tfi&�6ne adopted.would.`be t
hel ful4-to an'a
p pplicant Council`s decided that appli_'
�., cations;, would be acknowledged 'a by letter: on City of. Sowa
f
r
City stationery,+ signed-:by ;the `Mayor, °' and =all applications
would be{ received .and -forwarded --by' the:.City: Clerk -:to "
Ca-1laghan & `'Co. F ';The"Mayor advised Nir:Reaune' to .draft, the
" criteria: 11 45 -
va
C v
z
as Z- .' i ttry �.r...t ]}•.:_ -_ _ at :.
L , �` x`i: I :ley}• y y F -/ ' j1T.
?f '3p c• r '--a<< t { d. rpt -. � - _ ^ t
_ 3 _
st• y ys sx• ..f ` �. _
c`
c
y.
J y.
>< _ •? � - �.tr,. - _ sh �s-!`-f.1 ' .w z Y'�Y 4r-v .� .. � ._ ..' �. ., r � _' f..... �.