Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1974-12-17 Regular Meeting
U ... __ ,. ;:: .+ p - z - } SJ �' m � r � T � K�.� � s_ `{2.x�15,) � Fiµ���} � 1 ". f. l.T~ � � �uh5 �FS_':`��y atiat^... �� �STur dl?t::.... ,._ . e. ... � .... - i > `.. R 0 L L CALL Regular MEETING OF BRANDT CZARNECKI DAVIDSPN dePROSSE WHITE 7:30 P.M. nppprnhar 17. 1974 PRESENT ABSENT V he-: ©?sial \ \\ \Walc / ,Send ... _ <«ex , ° Thei \ \ /Was \ \\\2 \Cou < ©`' \e \\ �\ \\i3, Ka . »e 2� \-o --st" % f `Da': « <m?\ }f0 \ f p b \ eta t(a : §{ .es t i§{ §e ±n9 /ma i nk# lo% I it :\b --r--:-- - - ..�.� .� \, a .», � # %§) %P ƒ§/44\§a6ka£@6\aye »? io s fr m� he §ouncilm&m »£k/ 2 The-, > w? » . «�. iaa 4 7§r sev \al hour s o di « 2 «y w< , n ƒrocs f r ƒte pr3po ais. He sta 4 »« .f k.eac \@roposa 2?/\ i ke o4d(d -y a \d §n that .£h4 \§o 96i } ©akpi£o: e a © � .. i Cl A Ociate6»bgusln «-1 O§at/2 \ atm Gd ±o instruct all — erg ,* ±t to:the' ,City #a aRe r s- �cilMinutes :mtier :'197 )•P:M. with the Council irner;'and.Mr..Bechtoldt Ion of, `the councilmember ;ouncil :Wrill meet in City Attorney function. at the Comprehensive Pian. tions of positions.in the ,i n Director of Communit opment'Director.Senior c lmaw,Brandt`.Lett;the entative co¢mittee which would Comprehensive Plan whic-i: zarnecki-and deProsse, z romthe -'City ;Manager, a City anning,>Bob:Hilgenberg, and Regional Planning, nriing'.and Zoning -Commission, and•seconded_by'Davidsen roposed;be:approved. om;_the room. suggested that in:con- catthe !whole, area be lrecommendation. As t%o,:the .city from the ;omprehensive Plan and r commented on .the revised iepartment. it was moved iat `the :City Manager be Senior 'and Associate descrip ions`:as presented. sse`;voting no . le _application for advance nd_Community Development the.:work done on -the r program is part, of . the se _aiid seconded by White to •fill -out the appropriate ey under Title I, Housing on carried .� what :was :happening, the Frantz/Braverman`' sewer noting that additional time for a meeting with rks Director and City: Attorney would be needed. dePzosse left the room. _ t also advised that he had investi"gated the letter lder,'_concerning pasasenger servicein;Iowa -City letter he diad drafted ; There were no objections s�statement that the letter be-.transmitted to �ar� rt=Ray roved by Davidsen and'iseconded..by-White that suspended and the ? " � 2 4 r -r- 2 tt .]S SYti wY ' 7 :_.-�.-•r' x t �, r: .' � <�t x ecembiN er 7 7 x974 -�: - tir ' Toman deProsse returned to ;the meeting. 1_ r Hayek advised of fa _correct3. on .the agrreement, ;Consultants` for:: the` Towa `Cit :'Riverfront 'Plan rase'=oto =the ;f-irst sentence onPaRe2, :so ;;; orwish-to terminate, this. -`,agreement It ;Brandt and seconded by deErosse toradopt the / i rovin _tYCe`` Contract:er=with' Stanle Consultants '. Lonlas-note_-, pon ro cal ePro-sse, White, - iecki�and Davidsen voted _aye'. Motion carried. arnecki explained that bids had. not;been_received unitary Sewer, Project'No.1,`' due to ,problems in <easemento�there would -!be no -act on. on the oardinQ the'Contract "o pity Manager, Dennis .Kraft; presented the, staff �n"torabandon the Lafa ette Street Brid 3 "cost°= 195 `OOO. to re lace"' -it It was moved "by :onded'by .,that vacating --of tLafayette Street and/,or abandoning the. bridge to Planning. andrZoning,,,Commission. ,.Motion carried._ Mus appeare&Rcommenting that the:lack.bf a bridge .,.: :nt to that .whole area, and asked.tha'v the Council matter morecarefully: It was';ponted out that Lrces approval w.is,-: also needed:' Attorney,Hayek: Iax4Yocumzhad ii been apprised of ;the..staff gin. was taken care of earlier'in the meeting, 3 1 -ter 11, 1 - f- rovediby,deProsse and.-;seconded:by White to adopt - Dn ApproviA Class C Beer; and Liquor=License r` Eor Ri'chard�Corcoran''aba`/the Shamrock, .5 15 S. Gilbert.. 11 White, Brandtr�Czarnecki[, Davidsen,' deProsse Motion ,.carried: a r moved by deProsse"and; seconded by,Whte-to adopt on Approving'Class=CrLiquor Permit Application for ck alba''/Laz :T'Leo and L6unge:;",,122`Wright St. Upon p� p an t, zarnec i, rDavi sen,; a rosse, :White ,voted on ,carried r :1 moved Yby dePro sse and:,seconded by .Davidsen to adopt on Approving Class C'Beer Permit Application for Hollywood. Blvd Upon roll:;' call'; C z arne ck i sDaVDsen, . te, Brandt ;,voted ':aye' Motion carried.: 411 1 = f' 6 y .:':.. r� C c 0 11 IOWA CITY CITY COUNCIL AGENDA • REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF DECEMBER 17, 1974 7:30 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CIVIC CENTER 410 EAST WASHINGTON 0 REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING DECEMBER 17, 1974 7:30 P.M. Item No. 1 - Meeting to order Roll Call Item No. 2 - Reading of minutes of regular Council meeting of November 26, 1974, adjourned Council meeting of November 22, 1974, and special Council meeting of December 6, 1974. Item No. 3 - Public discussion. Item No. 4 - Receive minutes of Boards and Commissions. a. Human Relations Commission minutes of November 18, 1974 meeting, b. Airport Commission minutes of November 21, 1974 meeting. c. Parks and Recreation Commission minutes of December 11, 1974 meeting. Item No. 5 - Consider setting a public hearing on the disposition of City property at the Northeast corner of Gilbert and Benton Streets, 74-1476. Item No. 6 - Public -hearing to rezone a tract of land at 2650 South Riverside Drive from an.R1A.Zone to an Ml Zone. Z-7421. Item No. 7 - Discussion of park land purchase in Northeast Iowa City. Item No. 8 - Business from the City Council. Item No. 9 - Report on items from the City Manager and the City Attorney, Item No. 10 - Considerordinance rezoning certain parcels in the R-14 Urban Renewal area to a CBS Zone. Z-7314. (First Reading) Item No. 11 - Consider ordinance to amend the, high rise provisions of .the Zoning Code. Z-7417. (Second Reading) Item No. 12 - Consider ordinance amending Chapter 7.12 of the Municipal Code of Iowa by repealing Ordinance Nos. 2150A and 2369. (Second Reading) Item No. 13 - Consider resolution amending Personnel Procedures. Item No. 14 - Consider resolution approving the final plat of Oakwoods Addition, Part 6B. S-7412.' Item No. 15 - Consider resolution approving contract with Stanley Consultants for Iowa City Riverfront Plan. Item No. 16 - Consider resolution awarding contract for the 1974 Sanitary Sewer Project No.l. Public Agenda Page 2 December 17, 1974 Item No. 17 - Consider recommendation on the Lafayette Street Bridge. Item No. 18 - Consider tentative selection of proposal for construction of housing under the Section 23 Housing Assistance Plan. Item No. 19 - Correspondence to the City Council. Item No. 20 - Issuance of permits. a. Consider resolution approving Class C Beer and Liquor License Application for Richard Corcoran dba/the Shamrock, 515 S. Gilbert. b. Consider resolution approving Class C Liquor Permit Application for Jerry Starbuck dba/Lazy Leopard Lounge, 122 Wright St. c. Consider resolution approving Class C Beer Permit Application for A -Mart, 901 Hollywood. d. Consider resolution refunding Cigarette Permit for Donnelly's, 119 S. Dubuque. e. Consider resolution..refunding Liquor License for Donnelly's, 119 S. Dubuque. Item No. 21 - Public discussion. Item No. 22 - Adjournment. C. Park and Recreation Commission minutes of December 11, 1974. �'' C. u�V � 14C��141Y Action: Item No. 5 Comment: Action: - CONSIDER SETTING A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE DISPOSITION OF CITY PROPERTY AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF GILBERT AND BENTON STREETS. 74-1476. Mr. W. A. Fotsch has submitted a request to purchase only a portion of City property bordered on the west by Maiden Lane, on the south by Benton Street, and on the east by Gilbert Street. The subject property lies in the northeast corner of the described area. In an initial letter to the Council dated August 13, 1974, Mr. Fotsch had indicated an interest in purchasing the entire area. A A%•�`� AGENDA REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING DECEMBER 17, 1974 7:30 P.M. Item No. 1 - MEETING TO ORDER ROLL CALL -m II l X/L' wt c e --..r do cs Item No. 2 - READING OF MINUTES OF REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF NOVEMBER 26, 1974, ADJOURNED COUNCIL MEETING OF NOVEMBER 22, 1974, AND SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING OF DECEMBER 6, 1974. Item No. 3 - PUBLIC DISCUSSION. / I✓ S 1 LN Af. ` YI V 1. IJ i'f C 1 Ci � � I � � 1 1 " � V - 1 VI, . i I L / tf I 10 • /' // �r . , r 1 t : b.: t�.i h. r Vr'Yl1 Item No. 4 - RECEIVE MINUTES OF BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS. a. Human Relations Commission minutes of November 18, 1974, meeting. b. Airport Commission minutes of November 21, 1974, meeting. C. Park and Recreation Commission minutes of December 11, 1974. �'' C. u�V � 14C��141Y Action: Item No. 5 Comment: Action: - CONSIDER SETTING A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE DISPOSITION OF CITY PROPERTY AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF GILBERT AND BENTON STREETS. 74-1476. Mr. W. A. Fotsch has submitted a request to purchase only a portion of City property bordered on the west by Maiden Lane, on the south by Benton Street, and on the east by Gilbert Street. The subject property lies in the northeast corner of the described area. In an initial letter to the Council dated August 13, 1974, Mr. Fotsch had indicated an interest in purchasing the entire area. A A%•�`� �--t.e�e.�,✓•—tom. 9 e�w�-• . GGVI-C W♦•e. tl ( �v,-. �,C'..ec�i 6-v�.-� _ _,�• _ G� y...� e_.. -u G�..-L r n i✓! e-�t. c� .: ,� .0:/ _ _' cL. ' ,e_ c� . A C+-=-C.�.w. _- r L ILEIr_�..�...'�.t..r. G ZI A (f C V (rill C 1G fit • d!w t �` . . ti �C_ �`S L J cL' Z C .� _ I � ` �O '""." -iLG�� . /s(i.e._.l'.�� .�:.-k•� C• s�� . ! / ,"1°' t�� .. +'_ ^ _( -t �Lt I L_.�lc.l•.(!,-<.;I"' V _ C 0/21 CY Lil- w,l v -r! - U• _ �Yf� �' /C.'!iJIsle-, v Ile, e.wi r•_. .��. f'�. _.ri ;�i..�_�. r .� �%t.(� t'-:�... ..t_ ate.. _.. C�-. y..'_�.L't, ..�r Cl �:*`_'��.. �..__. �.�1.-(- c' -. t'. �• .. _.. r{ er, .CC_ (t !—t-t..C-R'1..-�...le^---- (. \.4t•,�r "-:. �%-.{..�w'-e..�f�.•,�+�.j'_ . �L/_-:.t-t-�•�-+�—..l. c:.�• _ -! W lG� .E..�. P'..., !•:.�-i�'...t �.. i. /�..,� V�"f�_/. ��.-:_r!L-A k( Lc f i trA-�4-t•t_.�..� �Iii:N.-,+.•`�.-'a.•�..�.,_e-F� '' �t-t.c t_i...s4�. �..�'"t.t.,—�({-+.',(�.-amu � ,.�-7.;w�.-v�.n�,:ty tt.�•t:'�td�k..,��.-' I _ �'1-Y �. C t_•.lw,.�.w .' � rJ G�t.,.w. �A.«4-;raV 4t,,.,..p. 7 n� - {t,,`.,a-...r���,•., _, C.-t�l..c ...�--v...�..U...�^-rte.-�-L { - f 0/21 CY Lil- w,l v -r! - U• _ �Yf� �' /C.'!iJIsle-, v Ile, e.wi r•_. .��. f'�. _.ri ;�i..�_�. r .� �%t.(� t'-:�... ..t_ ate.. _.. C�-. y..'_�.L't, ..�r Cl �:*`_'��.. �..__. �.�1.-(- c' -. t'. �• .. _.. r{ er, .CC_ (t !—t-t..C-R'1..-�...le^---- (. \.4t•,�r "-:. �%-.{..�w'-e..�f�.•,�+�.j'_ . �L/_-:.t-t-�•�-+�—..l. c:.�• _ -! W lG� .E..�. P'..., !•:.�-i�'...t �.. i. /�..,� V�"f�_/. ��.-:_r!L-A k( Lc f i trA-�4-t•t_.�..� �Iii:N.-,+.•`�.-'a.•�..�.,_e-F� '' �t-t.c t_i...s4�. �..�'"t.t.,—�({-+.',(�.-amu � ,.�-7.;w�.-v�.n�,:ty tt.�•t:'�td�k..,��.-' I _ �'1-Y �. C t_•.lw,.�.w .' � rJ G�t.,.w. �A.«4-;raV 4t,,.,..p. 7 n� - {t,,`.,a-...r���,•., _, C.-t�l..c ...�--v...�..U...�^-rte.-�-L c r Comment: Mr. Charles _R. Walden has submitted an application to rezone a 3/4 acre tract of land located east of South Riverside Drive near its intersection with Highway 218 from an R1A Zone to an M1 Zone. The Planning and Zoning Commission on November 14, 1974, recommended by a 5-0 vote denial of the application because of the preponderance o1-f� adjoining R1A zoning. Action: �'-' �. � 1 V,_•/J4..l.t i t'o L" by h A ( r [t n �t f /, l r.••� -0-yP14 /N I%^i lit. P�Db , L v �_h, "zl-1.,1 `.D Urn C.� i G.!d Item No. 7 — DISCUSSION OF PARKALAND_P— RCHASE IN NORTHEAST IOWA CITY. J a e t r s -14 a e e (' 1 r Action: / r t "n .7C" 7. cam. .:v t'�.rt -u>a=ad (�< r � Item No. �c r� C'� / CA- t..-..�jh 'f+'L 4L•^ -[.r .+i -:_.r• ,< ��d- t -i � v � l -t •. � � . . - ^,-/ t {' 9 — REPORT ON T CITY MANAGER AND THE CITY ATTORNEY. • At ^ c_a c..C..t.. GL\ - t L: -Q..../ t: ..61.11-x!3-!-. t. f...-\..1 Lt_ -1.- ir :�, .. ... _.- Item No. 8 — BUSINESS FROM THE CITY COUNCIL. , 'j C I.., Item No. �c r� C'� / CA- t..-..�jh 'f+'L 4L•^ -[.r .+i -:_.r• ,< ��d- t -i � v � l -t •. � � . . - ^,-/ t {' 9 — REPORT ON ITEMS FROM THE CITY MANAGER AND THE CITY ATTORNEY. • At ^ c_a c..C..t.. GL\ - t L: -Q..../ t: ..61.11-x!3-!-. t. f...-\..1 Lt_ -1.- ir :�, .. ... _.- .J L l Jl L .. _ �{/ t. V�. C. �. h ���.'"(-� �/t.�. !.L'l,✓' ,.yt Cj"Y �`:4-.. I �1 �f �y. �'' <` L .. 'r�\. 1 1 V Q- t' elS... _ ri�`� 1-9-4 C•. fk ek.. L G....i t. -Z) t f �,: i .. �Y-F� ` _ - 6't C.i t% J f t-rr' �_ . I . C�✓ _ L� F (%t l! ." Y v � �•,a' r.J r �/ f I r t'.` i 1 � _ 42--v' L r C- jp�1 r s t 1 ! f / r� )61� '-�• G ' (.J t� E � c� t l w-:� �Of � G r_. � 4 �v C � tr -c + C r i . Ci l.'r l5. � ?•tee-' G� e -c ,-t '�,�Qr� � / � r �.c � t t..= � ci. _ t ;, , . � / � [ ! (..0 �.i. /< . _ • f,Y.•— . �+T1 "fir Y � Y4 Pr �J c Ci .M Vin ai 4 Jap lu.- p V -i / .1 ; . . . ., , -I--- V lu.- p V -i / .1 ; . . . ., , -I--- - - l L M i •tLt • r9 � i r _ \� J. t _. f ` (: •',• ( �•1 } ! -. _.'i'i\. �. / iLC•..t./ Ci i �� �t..�--.. � C_. C.. . t f? � a:f !. f. t � ' . i i� ` 1' . .. -t l � V�✓1"leti_.Q C17 � l [ 6.7 [ 2 � is r. L� �', G - '. ., ^+-... 'e.. ��if 1,e.c^. . l,��- • T i Gl-i�_ (....-e•-•'t_ G. �l %.^. t. (� � �.. � ....I-.L-.: L.<: �� , I J_ A-+.../ . _!/ .1 ft 1 � 1 _ l 1•• ~ r _ - � / _ / i.:-Y".�.� t�� Lit. - � J .. - -C.. e•-..r.f '� , ._... .6....- Rf/..!_.f... -. - � ' V r r II I ' I !L- C/ .f'4 v'N- Q _ .-.. _ .��� C-L u- �-t �_ � "L �' C� t! ., L .: • ,- /.._.�_.J r _.:? .� � "...,,�- � . �' :. C., i. L-1 �..o.�: t_ ij-.Y•f1�..... �..1`..•:- �..�. '�. �...' — 4 � '� [ :' V ,tom/ iL C'.. . _-_. i k'C 1 v / `.AJC-'�• r_ -< . -.. D. - Y. Lll— u- -(: _.. ., i � era_-t..h.' t` .._` .. ,_ �,' • _. , L',: � _- C/..� � �-/ ...h.. il�.r��-i.: �'ti1.i%,... �L�_. t�... �,� t1••' LY'-�' c+-'::+ ti - � ; GL/LG " C�1�-Y.-L-:J-.-....t�f..-•-tnL:�V"r`1.. '""'Lr sl_-. �"'.,,.F 1 'J i •• �:� .-? .� .+ re r..t D r. r v n , . r C �i i 7- ✓ h Y �% . 7✓L��--- .�- IV: z.n.-t<--_�.! l �..a-t_ 3 c, -.G ,>r. � � .,,--LI �i '' � ;' i c_..}, i r.2 Via... c_' c�.-�_�':,_- '�.._t_.:.,_., ,• ___::• _ . 41 to f ` F� �/'� -..1 �• 1. �.�\i. t 1.... L. _ �, •/ a s i t :1 1...l-�-..�.'�i.t Z.. l^A.� - CI'.w.+Gl...'C.., L1 -1'L _ �v'"�.+-�s'i... K.-.'!\.✓t.-�T^� .���•+.�/ �`�' .'1,�� /., i _ �• -. JG�-�•� V yt�.:i� �C? •fit-- _ .. .. _ __ .'� 1. K � �^^ 2 7 GGi � C. L G [e Ni f f - �C L.![. G. ��:. „--'f ,'�-'):: ,y. r_...r�-�a._,C�---�� �•...� '�'C f w -r. _. ,.-f f-...-....� t �+� � Q.rcCi-� _.✓�G-s�}i."1._.G.-:!. ✓. -.tet.,,.-.1-t 1::..._...-�: .f`.. �-•� �^--� � '�... .: ..f r i..- s>'�...t;.'.a�•-� _ W ✓�.' _ _ _. �.I.r-,->r,,- n� � e.�'�.� ,�y..rt-e�rS.iti.,.�-.� r... G . �✓t..�!+j/! tT'vt...:y�' i` . �-s"-^'a-w.>Q...6.r-. _ iI,"6 -1� ( "J �'L'-1-�.aw. � �-7i^ :✓+,� /""A=ti.1.L� - 1""'•--. x.'F•^.., ..- C.t_ti._. V�. cam. `^.p. ',_ �t...l...%..•�`L.'• _.,E`�a• �'� �. �.; .,.�j '/•-., _ __.. aft Ll Item No. 9 - (Continued) / z V ."f V e -t J21 [; 4C11 1. _ AREA TO A CBS ZONE. Z-7314. (FIRST READING) Comment: The Planning and Zoning Commission on October 11, 1973, recommended by a 5-0 vote that certain parcels identified in the R-14 Urban Renewal plan be rezoned to a CBS Zone. A CBS Zone will enable development of a high-rise building as provided in the proposed ordinance amend- ing the Zoning Code above. Public hearing was held December 10, 1974. Action: /J / Sr l I • �) r+- C �t x Item No. 11 - CONSIDER ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE HIGH RISE PROVISIONS OF THE ZONING CODE. Z-7417. (SECOND READING) f Comment: The Planning and Zoning Commission on October 24, 1974, recommended by a,6-0 vote the adoption of an ordinance to amend Section 8.10.19 of the Zoning Code. Changes proposed include: 1. To allow high-rise development in the High Density District within the CBS Zone; 2. To exclude the high-rise High Density District from the.R3A Zone, 3. To provide for one and one-half (1�) parking spaces for each dwelling unit for high-rise development in the Medium Density District, and 4. To increase the yard requirements for high-rise development in the Medium Density District: for every foot in building height above 45 feet, the yards to be increased by 2.2 feet. Public Hear - $ng was held at the November 26, 1974, meeting. �� / D :/� cew,r/- f"t"(_rz Ear` i. Action: f 2 c L { Item No. 10 - CONSIDER ORDINANCE REZONING CERTAIN PARCELS IN THE R-14 URBAN RENEWAL AREA TO A CBS ZONE. Z-7314. (FIRST READING) Comment: The Planning and Zoning Commission on October 11, 1973, recommended by a 5-0 vote that certain parcels identified in the R-14 Urban Renewal plan be rezoned to a CBS Zone. A CBS Zone will enable development of a high-rise building as provided in the proposed ordinance amend- ing the Zoning Code above. Public hearing was held December 10, 1974. Action: /J / Sr l I • �) r+- C �t x Item No. 11 - CONSIDER ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE HIGH RISE PROVISIONS OF THE ZONING CODE. Z-7417. (SECOND READING) f Comment: The Planning and Zoning Commission on October 24, 1974, recommended by a,6-0 vote the adoption of an ordinance to amend Section 8.10.19 of the Zoning Code. Changes proposed include: 1. To allow high-rise development in the High Density District within the CBS Zone; 2. To exclude the high-rise High Density District from the.R3A Zone, 3. To provide for one and one-half (1�) parking spaces for each dwelling unit for high-rise development in the Medium Density District, and 4. To increase the yard requirements for high-rise development in the Medium Density District: for every foot in building height above 45 feet, the yards to be increased by 2.2 feet. Public Hear - $ng was held at the November 26, 1974, meeting. �� / D :/� cew,r/- f"t"(_rz Ear` i. Action: f 2 c L { Agenda J �� _ • December 17, 1974 A 't Page 4 t%� fY-/. ® Item No. 12 - CONSIDER ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 7.12 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF C�4-� IOWA BY REPEALING ORDINANCE NOS. 2150A AND 2369. (SECOND READING) Comment: This amendment to the Municipal Code specifically abolishes the prohibition of being intoxicated, simulating intoxication or con- suming any intoxicating liquor upon a public ground or in a public place or being found in a state of intoxication other than in a public place within the corporate limits of Iowa City. Action: 1J 64 'A A.0 t+ �1rj� % �2 . .- cj�- - J v �� Item No. 13 - CONSIDER RESOLUTION AMENDING PERSONNEL PROCEDURES. ' �w �� omment: This resolution amends the Personnel Procedures to allow for reimburse- ment of certain transportation and child care expenses of members of City Boards and Commissions. Action: Item No. 14 - CONSIDER RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FINAL PLAT OF OAKWOODS ADDITION, PART ® v 6B. S-7412. Comment: Action: The Planning and Zoning Commission on November 26, 1974, recommended by a 5-0 vote approval of the Final Plat of Oakwoods Addition, Part 6B, a replat of a portion of Oakwoods Addition, Part 6 located in the vicinity of Amhurst Street and Marquette Circle (renamed to Hastings Avenue). Approval of the subject plat would allow a connection between Amhurst Street and the future extension of Westminster Street northerly. This item was deferred from the December 10, 1974, metiinng�,�Y It1. _ I Item No. 15 - CONSIDER RESOLUTIO14 APPROVING CONTPrACT WITH STANLEY j ZIOWA CITY RIVERFRONT PLAN. �dc.�11 ez ZON$ULTANTS FO Action: I_ �.-11 0.L. 1� c U Item No. 16 - CONSIDER RESOLUTION AWARDING CONTRACT FOR THE 1974 SANITARY SEWER PROJECT NO. 1. Comment: The Resolution of Necessity and the plans and specifications on this project were approved at the December 10, 1974, Council meeting; how- ever, bids were not taken on this project due to problems in obtaining the easement for the sanitary sewer to be constructed. It is antici- pated that this project will be rebid in mid-February of 1975. Action: A E /ZO,CJvn AgendaaG� � December 17, 1974 av�`pvo Page 5 O ,C�1/ /� ,� e r•_- G.rpw.. �,�s- ttu+LC}Q i it �`/�''{(n_' �% i �� � JI.IG�./wrn•L-..•r_/l 3^tF-r./L`�•w-f.�- rr �+'`V���-w....-.-sf-r-.,. �`"�"'-t' -f�.. _ i�-.��i-_.�..R.,1. Z11.4--a-�-- Item No. 17 - CONSIDER RECOMMENDATION ON THEE LAFAYETTEE STREET BRIDGE. Action: r v r. _ .:.tom-iy� li t-�LQ.i � 3 � C -D -•-r) O r' ,C i... .1.--A .o- A c � �1...:. c1_�G_ Item No. 18 - CONSIDER TENTATIVE SELECTION OF PROPOSAL FOR CONSTRUCTION OF HOUSING UNDER THE SECTION 23 HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN. Comment: Three proposals were received by the City on December 2, 1974, for construction of Federally assisted housing for the elderly. The Housing Commission will make recommendation for tentative selection of Housing for the Elderly project at the December 16, 1974, Council informal session. The City Manager will present the staff recommendation. Action: Item No. 19 - CORRESPONDENCE TO THE CITY COUNCIL. Item No. 20 - ISSUANCE OF PERMITS. a. Consider resolution approving Class C Beer and Liquor License �3 Application for Richard Corcoran dba/the Shamrock, 515 S. Gilbert. Action: oo b. Consider resolution approving Class C Liquor Permit Application 5� for Jerry Starbuck dba/Lazy Leopard Lounge, 122 Wright St. Action: _ C. Consider resolution approving Class C Beer Permit Application for ��— A -Mart, 901 Hollywood. Action: Y _ d. Consider resolution refunding Cigarette Permit for Donnelly's, 119 S. Dubuque. Action: ® _ e. Consider resolution refundin-'quor L g Liicense for Donnelly's, J 11% 119 S. Dubuque. Action:_ �/C� d� �' �•".� V --------------- e N_.-I-Cr��-C. G-rJ '�..._c'�1.^Y�✓t�... �r � .t_.V a_..r. ..i �--(.f,-� ...t. / �r C r' Agenda December 17, 1974 Page 6 ® Item No. 21 - PUBLIC DISCUSSION. 4 r7�. t�-�.1..)`4 �_ "-l�✓`�✓\ ' ! ���I\_�� .-{'�I P--` .l..+li ..J( 1":. u( -1 •l.�l._f-a .-f_ K-Yi-�--cl 01 V Item No. 22 - ADJOURNMENT. Thel 4ay-, o t the C I&V -Tre-se -Abi6;�t: that -1XIC" roa cas'. n :no:,way.. May6l Walk! War 'a wa minu_t_e_s._,.r_ for..,,Novemt co.unc.i1 to -;.correct theirl selection. After discussion, tier currence b ;the .Councia3 for t}ie=Cit Man Y Y, AttorneyLHayek noted receipt; ,by Cou the speeding ;question and on sec 1o He ':also -;explained hat U'r an Renewal Dir' asked hin to ;present a ; resolution: amend`. values for .parcels; 93/17, Crandic, 93/18; Greenlan'd,.101/12,Edwards. It was move seconded-' by SVhite tto adopt the Re'solutio Bran dt,Czarnecki, Daviisen=dePr_osse an. Motion carried. CityYAttorney Hayek a'1s the" executive.;session to discuss :.the 1`aw 4._ the:' lawsuit :for, Belle and Short It;was moved by dePross;e and second rules be, suspended; and ,the third ;reading Rei_one.a Tr'.act of'Land;owned by A1vin;:St given_ by; tithe ;only. Upon roll .c`all Cza; White; Brandt voted 'aye'. :Motion carr -i given by` ti.'t1e only It wa moved" by =Br Davidsen ,to adopt ahe ,Ordinance Upon ;r <� deProsse, White, Brandt;, Czarnecki voted It was :moved°by dePross`e and second rules' be` suspended' and rthe third =reading the Municipal; Code by Adopting. they' Lates Electrical Gode with Certan'Addtions`a Repealing Chapter 9.20=;and Enacting4 a =Ne be°_given by .title only Uponrroll call:: Czarnecki, Davidsen voted 'aye' Motion given by titT'e only Council discussed Ordinance -;The motion:=by ,deProsse an`d s adopt' the Ordinance was. withdrawn. feu and seconded by White,o defer it for tH Manager' -to investigate"the charges'. It was moved4by Brandt -;and seconded rules' be =suspended and ;the ahird-readinE y Amend the Municipal Code by=Amending :Sec Adopt; by Reference the1975 National E1'E by_ title "only . Upon roll call White, Bi - deProsse voted '',aye' . `=Motion ca ried--.-ar by: title only It was ;moved by ,White ai that action be deferred for- two ,weeks Attorney Hayek explained the status purchase the. arcel of vacated land, the P near the intersection of Lafayette Streg f.. i A _ Council Minutes November 26, 1'974- 5 2 hat another•.,appraisal,be done.„ There was no Council apprais1. al ,has not been finished for the park portion on Park`Addrtion-Part-;9, and.advice;from Attorney if the preliminary,-p%lat for'. Washington `Park Addition s all requirements, ;that it wasriot:valid to refuse cause°;of the attempt to purchase:.park property, it �y_Bran dtand'`seconded by Czarnecki to adopt the Approving Preliminary ;Plat, _for IVashington Park irt.-9. Upon colli: `call.;Braridt;..Czarnecki, Davidsen and ted 'aye', White ;;abstaining Motion 'carried,4/0. in agerrwas,instruc"ted to te,l the.deyeloper, Mr. Glasgow, in the '_stubs;= or 'cul de sacs; or- do any paving or the--,;:.area-'.,f .Green- Mountain. Drive is tim -the moved :by deProsse and seconded by White to adopt tion Authorizing.Joint Law Enforcement Architectural Pr.,ovidng Funds, -;Iowa `'City',share to:;be $1;754.00. ;.allCzarnecki,;`Davidsen, deProsse, 'White_.and Brandt' ' ,Motion carried Designations for,pers'ons on the yard were di cusse_"d. It was moved by:de.Prosse and r, Czarnecki a_to appoint :Linda Dole. an& two designees ity Manager.; Motion:carried 18 will'_ibe discussed injexecutive session possible f the Resolution t`after,:reconvening in. -regular session. s moved:=by W}ite and seconded bydeProsse to adopt tion Awarding Contract_for the .;1974 Sidewalk Assessment Wolf Construction; Inc. of1Fowa=City=in wthe amount,' 52: Upon roll call Davidsen, dePro'sse,.White voted ndt'and:`Czarnecki;voted 'no'. Motion'>carried, 3/2. s moved.:by deProsse and seconded'by Davidsen to adopt ti.on,Accepting Work an"d OrderingPreparation,of.Plat merits for the 197,3,Pavement;Improvements Brogram, done - ave rs oneavers Upon roll, call 'White°, °Brandt;:: Czarnecki`, dePaosse vo't.ed 'aye'. Motion carried. s inoved` by deProsse andsseconded by .Brandt to adopt tion Adopting and; Levying the Frnal:.Schediiae ,of sand Providing for the Payment Thereof for the 1973 mprovementsf Program. tJ Upon ;roll 'call Brandt, Czarnecki, deProsse, White voted <'aye,',: Mo ion ;carried. tLL s movedby White, and seconded by:deRrosse-to adopt tion, Bstab IshingE Stop. Signs at,. the :Intersection of Clark, Oakland, rand uGrant Streets. ; ;Upon. roll `call WHite, Bran t voted !aye', Czarnecki `and Davidsen Motion carried_; 3/2 Page ff suggested objection As th of :Washing Hayek. that Part 9 mee approval b was- moved Resolution Addition F deProsse v The CityN to :Snot put grading:! lir, parcels -.at Itrw� the - Resoli. Study, =ahc Upon roll voted '-aye Advisory i seconded t ' from. the ( Item adoption c It;w the Resoli Programi: t4 of ;$.12,13' '.aye', Bri IV wF the Resoli and Asses by=,Metrorl Davidsen, the Resor Assessmen Pavement. Davidsen, z® It -w the .Res`ol Court writ deProsse, voted .'=no i A _ Council Minutes November 26, 1'974- 5 2 hat another•.,appraisal,be done.„ There was no Council apprais1. al ,has not been finished for the park portion on Park`Addrtion-Part-;9, and.advice;from Attorney if the preliminary,-p%lat for'. Washington `Park Addition s all requirements, ;that it wasriot:valid to refuse cause°;of the attempt to purchase:.park property, it �y_Bran dtand'`seconded by Czarnecki to adopt the Approving Preliminary ;Plat, _for IVashington Park irt.-9. Upon colli: `call.;Braridt;..Czarnecki, Davidsen and ted 'aye', White ;;abstaining Motion 'carried,4/0. in agerrwas,instruc"ted to te,l the.deyeloper, Mr. Glasgow, in the '_stubs;= or 'cul de sacs; or- do any paving or the--,;:.area-'.,f .Green- Mountain. Drive is tim -the moved :by deProsse and seconded by White to adopt tion Authorizing.Joint Law Enforcement Architectural Pr.,ovidng Funds, -;Iowa `'City',share to:;be $1;754.00. ;.allCzarnecki,;`Davidsen, deProsse, 'White_.and Brandt' ' ,Motion carried Designations for,pers'ons on the yard were di cusse_"d. It was moved by:de.Prosse and r, Czarnecki a_to appoint :Linda Dole. an& two designees ity Manager.; Motion:carried 18 will'_ibe discussed injexecutive session possible f the Resolution t`after,:reconvening in. -regular session. s moved:=by W}ite and seconded bydeProsse to adopt tion Awarding Contract_for the .;1974 Sidewalk Assessment Wolf Construction; Inc. of1Fowa=City=in wthe amount,' 52: Upon roll call Davidsen, dePro'sse,.White voted ndt'and:`Czarnecki;voted 'no'. Motion'>carried, 3/2. s moved.:by deProsse and seconded'by Davidsen to adopt ti.on,Accepting Work an"d OrderingPreparation,of.Plat merits for the 197,3,Pavement;Improvements Brogram, done - ave rs oneavers Upon roll, call 'White°, °Brandt;:: Czarnecki`, dePaosse vo't.ed 'aye'. Motion carried. s inoved` by deProsse andsseconded by .Brandt to adopt tion Adopting and; Levying the Frnal:.Schediiae ,of sand Providing for the Payment Thereof for the 1973 mprovementsf Program. tJ Upon ;roll 'call Brandt, Czarnecki, deProsse, White voted <'aye,',: Mo ion ;carried. tLL s movedby White, and seconded by:deRrosse-to adopt tion, Bstab IshingE Stop. Signs at,. the :Intersection of Clark, Oakland, rand uGrant Streets. ; ;Upon. roll `call WHite, Bran t voted !aye', Czarnecki `and Davidsen Motion carried_; 3/2 Page. \ \ \ \\ . \ \\\\\ q {\w - \£h /R §41 ` 'Hamburg J11 x.....,. . ©y?a4({ s :6 m -_w %</§&e R It <-; ? £nom i§ ^«§yczarn Bky : \\ the Re l c £{o 2{/ . \ upon-, ¥Q1 \ «<«©°-°� d .v {e /' / \/ {h es ƒ 7 1 kive \ \ «\D#/{ ¥! . . : .. . d sb§r e§ ... .. . .. .� < . . . ...y. «©« ^222y( # we-© . . .. inom §§_ %b#4( � . � �. . . %u1, adding ) ?2 ?<\2 o »k§/u! \o�±s ic law s its . d ivi¢sen \/ \\%to}a�P Aft( \y«2 :seconded - it: &tided . . ... m:{t wasM( . ppo n$m JS £ ƒ 1 2 »© d« kc mbe: \ke of ti; . ... . \i#t r /ƒ r v v + 4 council Minutes 1 1 1974 ' 2 2z November.`"26, ndt, _Czdrri6dk' '-D'v risen, deProsse and White on carried; by de.Pross'e and seconded by.Brandt to adjourn :on carried-.. 11.30; P.M. - Otto 77 Q T t 010 ITT ... 0xv DON', IVAN 5 Von A Page 2 Yr Novembers22, `3974zi, a Y ' ir 3 if the Plaza was really apiece 'Mary Neu auser questio of 'a and ithat ;Council wants approve;the,.sale,<notirig t participation. id Drive,; appeared representing the Les' Moore, 116 Tower C Plaza be kept for _the neede' 4 Roy Justis, 1513 Brook First -Christian Church3;as a - asked that Councilgive a;;!' a.proposal for 62 _units. d buy thegland of their p�ropo Hepresented:Jack'Bower'soxi c Sasaki_-Dawson'deMay Assoca of :Research of the, Ebe a ,ze esthetics and community^ my older ;persons' Mr; Bowerso needs could be met, includ site on Gilbert "St-. and the. corner Mr._ Justis restated th would be; open, :to receiving - on ;the .former: Kelley' Cl;e'arie 19 :car parking lot, and'. o =related ?.to zoning sand garki sites -and fair,market=;value _ documents, the Council ment there. .. - l Margaret MacDonald app the. Council ,wouldLconsder citizen `input; rlabor and mo =Award. It was moved by Brandt Resolution Authori'zing<Exec Church -forks& eV,of',_Lo,ts 3 a; -2 `and 7 in'`Block 43, '3,7,$0: foo ,.total ;$113;400.00 co bidder for housing,,,.- z -a6Pross`eand _ White`" voted '- _ Motion carried 3/2 It'`was` and seconded, by White, to adjourn deProsse` that the' docum-tints November 24th .at 4:00 P.M. - for hearing.: Motion carried. y Manager,,and- for "any adjourmment , <a e It was moved ;by Davidsi to executive 'session Sun voted 'no'..'.Motion carried 4/1. on' interviews for,prospective`;i of, that `:meeting Upon _-roll- and=White voted 'aye','Bran4 i P _ ti Council nutes Novembers22, `3974zi, a 3 if the Plaza was really apiece sell; and urged_Council not to it°wouT'dknot help encourage citizen rt,appeared requesting that the id Drive,; appeared representing the officer of the Church Board;. He - >' vote 'so they, can put;toge_ther isrigt andEgive ahem an option to L is chosen, as the`best proposal.. he.;Minneapolis branch office of >, Iorrane,i,Schneider, Director iocety, who options, „discussed rement .inz.meeting the needs of 3ressnted schematics.of:how,these circulation of :traffic. ' a yes vote' meant. that Council Proposal; for; 6,2.units to.be_built site on Gilbert "St-. and the. corner support>such action as needed variancesCouncil discussed juesaioningif when reviewing bid' .plantings` isider the, and ;develop-. ed `noting that she couldn't believe ding'the Plaza where voluntary had contributed`:to a Beautification id seconded.by White toadopt the on=of Contract with First Christian 4, and the,west '46 feet of; Lots quare feet ai,1m 00 per square ngent upon their being the successful, terly. _Upon_rbll-call Czarnecki, =,Brandt:andDavi:dsen voted 'no'. wed= by White :and seconded by ,,ceived b:e made-a.part of the public z and seconded, by White, to adjourn November 24th .at 4:00 P.M. - for y Manager,,and- for "any adjourmment 11=:czarnecki;;.Day.idsen, deProsse. voted 'no'..'.Motion carried 4/1. i P _ ,The.rFIo K r'. S _ presents:'; Czarnecki... joint execii� cussion signed by a who:was ':out; present :wer ,The.rFIo on.:the 6th4 Conference ='l presents:'; Czarnecki... joint execii� cussion signed by a who:was ':out; present :wer 15) 'and `i It was: to 'adjourn,'- scli Brandt; `_Dav: necks abseri • Attorni Library Boa: session members '`tha* the'City !,S-A Librar, It .was; the -Library butlin'pd -°in Buchan, 'Far.] Motioncarr: City: Cler c ; E MEMBERS PRESENT: MEMBERS ABSENT: , Phillip Jones Richard Braverman Paul Neuhauser Bud Means Mori Costantino Elizabeth Diecke Jackie Finn Barbara Woodard Sally Smith CITY STAFF PRESENT: Mark Doolin Bob Bowlin Kay Maune SUMMARY OF DISCUSSION AND FORMAL ACTIONS TAKEN: Chairperson Jones introduced Barbara Woodard, a new commissioner. It was moved by Means and seconded by Costantino that the minutes of the October 21, 1974, meeting be approved as submitted. Motion passed by unanimous vote. Doolin informed the Commission that the Iowa Civil Rights Commission would be hold- ing a public hearing in Davenport on the 20th of November and any commissioner interested in going should contact him. Doolin requested Commission interest and participation in a training conference that would be sponsored by the Iowa Civil Rights Commission. After a brief discussion regarding content and date for such a conference Chairperson Jones suggested that the Education Committee meet with Mark Doolin and discuss further some of the topics brought up. Woodard was reminded that she would replace Celia Roberts on the the Education Committee. Doolin informed the Commission that presently he and Bob Bowlin were doing research into the impact on our ordinance of the Supreme Court decision in Cedar Rapids and any ordinance revisions that might be necessitated out of that decision. Neuhauser expressed the opinion that the ordinance as is, is stronger than the State Model Ordinance and any revisions might weaken it. He also stated that proposed revisions should not be made or researched without Commission decision. Costantino inquired of Neuhauser as to his intent on going to the School Board meeting. Neuhauser replied that he was uncertain that he would be able to find the time to make it. Chairperson Jones suggested that if he is unable, he should contact Mark Doolin and perhaps Mark would be able to attend the conference. It was moved by Braverman and seconded by Means that the Commission adjourn into executive session. Upon a roll call vote all members voted yes. The Commission adjourned into executive session at 8:30_ P.M. At 9:10 the Commission, by unanimous vote, held an open meeting to discuss a by-law amendment. Costantino moved that due to the number of complaints and the limited number of commissioners that only two commissioners be assigned to each conciliation team. Chairperson Jones moved that it be accepted pursuant to legal approval. At 9:10 P.M. it was moved by Jones and seconded by Braverman that the Commission adjourn back into executive session. Upon •T. voV l .-,111 VACe 4111 .111(`111b ril vo ('(,((, yao. '1'h(d (X1Ipft1: tswl.on AO-16tirrlc.. ..t.te; ti . 1 . 11 I{ )n e. i iL...J Y_v ll _: :airs ire ;�-. ' ?'; .,leab_i.nc - it .-'J _. _ _.. -e -D-d. w �_( � Y .. L1♦i'? •,� _ C 1 1 v __L1..7._ ♦., i e Ca r'�.'..i.. av / IOWA CITY PARK AND RE(EATION C DEC DBER 11, 1974 ® DAVIS BUILDING CX)NFEFENCE ROCM MEMBERS PRESENP: STAFF PRESENT: •i W i0( is - • • No, •• M Joan Buxton June Davis Sarah Fox James Lincberg Orrin Marc Robin Powell Virginia Hebert James Roegiers James Sangster H. Eugene Chubb Robert Lee Dennis Showalter 1. That while in no way underestimating the importance of law -inane ..r housing for the elderly, the Park and Recreation Cccnnission urges Council �_�'�' 1--fo retain as much green space as possible and to not underestimate the C Ace :�v value of Project GREEN'S effort. 2. That Catmi.ssion recommend that the ASERP Program be expanded to 13 schools with a $5.00 charge for each child. 3. That the Park and Recreation Commission expresses to Council its dismay at the steadily decreasing share of the City's General Fund being used for Park and Recreation operations in hopes that the FY 76 Budget can arrest this trend. 4. That the Park and Recreation Commission requests that the service level on playgrounds, at the pools and for potential experimental pro- grams such as puppetry, drama and gardening be restored to the level of 1973 when substantial cuts were required. SUMI;C OF DISCUSSION AND FORMAL ACTION TAKEN: The Park and Recreation Ccomission met in regular session on December 11, 1974 at 7:30 p.m. with Chairperson Fox presiding. * Davis moved and Buxton seconded that the minutes of the Novenber 13, 1974 meeting be approved as written. Unanimous. ® Chairperson Fox reported that the Russell annexation passed Council with an arbitration clause written into an agreement setting out screening provisions. • Page 2 Park and Recreation mission December 11, 1974 Fox also reported that the Streb rezoning has gone ahead and that the owners reportedly want the planting easement project started. The appraisals for the Washington Park Addition, Part 9 are not yet in and uncertainty remains as to the size of the proposed park. A letter from Nancy Seiberling regarding Chauncey Swan Plaza was dis- cussed. It was then moved by Powell and seconded by Lindberg that while in no way underestimating the importance of low-income housing for the elderly, the Park and Recreation Commission urges Council to retain as much green space as possible and to not underestimate the value of Project GREEN'S effort. Buxton, Fox, Lindberg, Marc and Powell voted aye and Davis abstained. Notion carried. The ASERP Report was then discussed resulting in two corrections: Page two -paragraph two-"i.e. Mark IV children, Title I children, etc." should be deleted. Page three -number four -"It is suggested that these points" should read "It is suggested that these three points..." It was pointed out by Gene Chubb that the figures contained in the "ASERP is Budget Information" (attached) were for one eight-week program and that if the program is to cover a school year, these figures must be doubled. Davis requested that the "ASERP Budget Information" be kept separate from the ASEE2P Report, as it was not prepared by the ASERP Steering Committee. * Davis moved and Lindberg seconded that the Park and Recreation Commission accept and recommend implimentation of the ASERP Committee Report dated December 6, 1974. Unanimous. (attached) * Following discussion, Buxton moved and Davis seconded that Commission recommend that the ASERP Program be expanded to 13 schools with a $5.00 change for each child. Buxton, Davis, Marx and Powell voted aye and Lindberg and Fox voted nay. Notion carried. June Davis and Robin Powell will represent Commission on ASERP at the Council meeting on Tuesday, Deoember 17. Regarding the Housing and Community Development Act, Chairperson Fox reported that she and Jim Sangster had made a presentation with Mary Neuhauser, Chairperson of the Riverfront Commission, to the Steering Committee on December 2, 1974. She presented an outline of Park and Recreation projects as the Act's regulations seem to apply to them. Commission's original, ranked list of C.I.P. projects done last spring was also included. After discussion, Commission requested of Council ® that they be given any reports from the Steering Committee in order to expedite planning. Buxton's Swimming Report was received and discussed by Ckxmmission. It was then announced that Flo Stockman has been namned as Buxton's replace- In a brief discussion of budgeting and "levels of service", it was pointed out that annual Leisure and Cultural Program Budgets have slipped in re- cent years when viewed as a per cent of the City's General Fund expendi- tures. (See "City of Iowa City Budget Briefing", October 22, 1974, page four, attached) . Leisure and Cultural opportunities slipped from 21.2% in 1970 to 15.5%.in 1974." (Parks and Recreation slipped from 15.8% in 1970 to 11.1% in 1974). (Library slipped frau 5.4% in 1970 to 4.5% in 1974). The impact has been on program operating budgets. * Lindberg moved and Buxton seconded that the Park and Recreation Commission express to Council its dismay at the steadily decreasing share of the City's General Fund being used for Park and Recreation operations in hopes that the FY 76 Budget can arrest this trend. Unanimous. Referring back to the minutes of November 1, 1974, Commission reaffirmed ® its commitment ":that although tree planting and City Park improvements concerning pool lights were deferred, Commission hopes that these items will be re -instated in the next budget." Bob Lee presented the Recreation Program Budget Proposal with the following oo mments updating the 1973 status and figures (attached, note double asterisked items). **a. FootlAers has been dropped pending increased interest. b. Women's volleyball attendance was over 1,000 through November, 1974. c. Parents have not been taking advantage of the Pre -School Gym hours so increased publicity was -suggested. d. Attendance at the Baby Care Program has increased to 1,386 through November, 1974. e. Shuffleboard was dropped for lack of interest in that time slot. f. Girl's softball should be inserted under account #1613.5. g. Attendance at the summer playground program dropped from approx- imately 21,378 to 14,769 in 1974. Factors possibly responsible were the staff cutbacks and dropping of evening hours. Attendance figures for special events are not included in the above figures. * It was moved by Buxton and seconded by Powell that the Park and Recreation Commission request that the service level on playgrounds, at the pools and for potential experimental programs such as puppetry, drama and gardening be restored to the level of 1973 when substantial cuts were required. Unanimous. Following a discussion of pressure for pool use and special hours for lap swinming, Joan Buxton was named as an -advisory person to investigate those aspects of the City's pool system. 11 C Cknmission expressed their concern about how difficult it will be to get to the skating ponds in City Park because of road construction and about the loss of square footage for skating rinks. Lindberg reported that skating areas at Melzose Lake, Happy Hollow and Longfellow School are no longer used. Staff was asked to look into the situation and to con- sider the use of future parking lots for rinks. Commission endorsed the three stated goals for the FY 76 Budget which Gene Chubb presented in "PROPOSED PARK OPERATIONS PROGRAM". Detailed discussion of this report was delayed until the January CmTnission meeting. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 11:10 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Ellen R. Flowers Secretary Recreation services should provide for all citizens, to the extent practicable, a variety of adequate year-round leisure opportunities which are accessible, safe, physi- cally attractive, and provide enjoyable experiences. They should, to the maximum extent, contribute to the mental and physical health of the community, to its economic and social well-being and permit outlets that will help decrease incidents of antisocial behavior such as crime and delin- quency- The Urban Institute "Measuring the Effectiveness of Incal Goverrmient Services" A. Goals of ASERP ASERP is a combined program of the Iowa City Schools and the Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department. The program is designed to provide recreation, not presently available, in the after school hours for elementary school age (grades 1-6) children. Since the Recreation Center is closed to these children after school for all activities except swimming, the Iowa City Schools' buildings will be used as the facilities. The schools will also provide: 1. Custodial service; 2. Non -consumable equipment; 3. Storage space; The ASERP Program is to provide: 1. An opportunity for all children to participate in constructive ® activities and positive self-expression with peer groups in a non -threatening situation, 2. A recreation experience to be conducted at neighborhood schools. This allows easy access for the age group the program is to reach. The Cminittee feels that the progrzim provides special benefits to those children whose parents are not at home after school and those children from low inane families. Therefore, special efforts should be made to make these families aware of this program, i --e= zx 1V Iocation The program should be made available at all elementary schools in Iowa City. Schools who would desire a program should take into consideration such factors as: 1. Space -storage space as well as program space; 2. Support and cooperation of parent -teacher groups. C. Student Eligibility and Enrollment All students in the ammunity, whether or not they reside in the attendance area of the school where the program is held, are eligible to participate in the program. This point warrants em- phasis in pre -registration publicity. D. Fees 1. It is anticipated that funding for this program can be found frau school, city, county, state and federal sources. If a fee is necessary,.it will be set to only contribute to the cost of consumable materials and instructors salaries, in keeping with IA 11 I the City's Fees and Charges Policy as regards recreation. 2. Participants who are not residents of Iowa City may be charged an additional fee to partially defray costs of planning, prepar- ation, or overall supervision provided by the Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department staff. 3. If the fees would pose an obstacle to participation, fees may be paid for via the Iowa State Department of Social Services, Johnson County, when participants qualify for such assistance; orfees may be paid for by a parent -teacher group at that school if the group wishes and is able to do so. +hre�_- 4. It is suggested that theseApoints be emphasized in pre -regis- tration publicity and that the registration form include a spot that can be checked in instances in which consideration for such financial assistance is desired. (Indicate on forms that this information will be pursued -may be called by Social Services, etc.) E. Participation in Planning and Operation of Program 1. Responsibility for overall planning, organization, and implemen- tation of the progran rests with the Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department staff, in cooperation with corresponding school per- sonnel. 2. Parks and Recreation Commission a. Appoint a Commission member as a liaison person to keep in contact with the program through City staff, principals, and parent -teacher groups. 10 11 b. Commission should receive evaluative material at the end of each program session to make possible Commission input for the following session 3. Parent-Teacher Groups Each school should appoint one person to contribute to planning, operation and evaluation. F. Mechanics of Staffing 1. Class size depends on space. 2. One paid leader per 15-20 participants, based on the type of activity. 3. Initially, there should be one volunteer per group with the idea of expansion as a desirable goal. These volunteers should be cannitted through and supervised by the volunteer Service Bureau in cooperation with such groups as the: a. PTA; b. Recreation Education and other University departments; c. High school volunteers; d. Any other viable sources of assistance. G. Program Content The ASERP Coordinator decides on program content based on input from principals and public school specialists in such areas as science, dramatics, physical education, music, art and early elementary ed- ucation. There will be an average of four activities offered each week for an eight week long session. H. Planning Steps 1. Director of Recreation in cooperation with ASEW Coordinator, i 0 Ll Superintendent of Schools and Camnission to select schools and decide scheduling of the two sessions in the evaluative week of the preceeding session. At this time school principals and PTA groups should be informed. 2. ASERP Coordinator talks to Principal of each participating school four to six weeks before start of program to: a. Get information concerning available space; b. Get input into program content for that school. 3. ASERP Coordinator to immediately alert Volunteer Coordinator as to school sites and discuss possible numbers of volunteers that will be needed. 4. ASERP Coordinator to consult with school specialists on program content. 5. ASERP Coordinator and Recreation Staff to finalize program con- tent and staffing needs which may vary from school to school. 6. Re -contact Volunteer Coordinator for specific volunteer com- mittments in order to finalize activity group sizes. 7. ASERP Coordinator talks to Parent-Teacher Group to: a. Identify liaison person in each school; b. Set up mechanics for registration; c. Discuss availability of volunteers from PTA, etc. 8. Publicity a. Newspaper releases; b. Radio spots; c. School handouts; 0 ASERP December 6, 1974 Page 6 d. Handouts available to teachers and all counselors; e. Handouts available to all social workers. 9. Registration Mechanics a. Operated by PTA at a non -workday hour; b. Checklist for low -inane (Social Services referral); c. Waiting lists kept; d. Should child be able to sign up for all three activities or have first choice filled and be put on waiting list for the others? 10. Operational Details a. Keep attendance; b. Permission slips for field trips; c. Before time to start each day, assemble entire group in one place; d. Starting hour may vary from school to school. 11. Evaluation a. Evaluative information should be obtained from the students who participate in the program and their parents and frau each principal, PTA person, each leader and the ASERP Coor- dinator. b. It is suggested that a brief set of written objectives be developed for the program as a whole at a particular school and for each activity that canprises a part of the program and that evaluation be based mainly on these objectives. For.example, given certain objectives, from the standpoints of the students involved, their parents, and those involved 0 K] in the supervision or provision of that part of the program, were these objectives met, what is their overall opinion about the value of that part of the program and of the pro - gran as a whole at that school, should the program be con- tinued, and, if so, how could it be inproved? From the standpoints of those involved in the planning, central coor- dination, or operation of the program as a whole at that school, what is their evaluation relating to planning, coordination, and operation of the program, what is their evaluation of the value and content of the program, should the program be continued, and if so, how could the program or its planning or operation be improved? c. It is suggested that two standard questionnaires be developed. d. Evaluative material to be presented by Staff to the Cnr- mission through its liaison person (see E, 2a). • MEMBERS PRESENT: MEMBERS ABSENT: OTHERS PRESENT: SUMMARY OF DISCUSSION AND FORMAL ACTIONS TAKEN: Dalrymple Bolnick Rogers Baum Amidon Matson Sando Winder McCall Moorhead Julie Zelenka Carol deProsse Sheran Matson and Julie Zelenka reported on the feasibility of social services funding under Title I. Apparently, HUD will allow such funding related to specific projects developed with Title I funds In general, the committee feels that any ® given social service project might be funded, but that final decision on any project would require HUD review and, therefore, a delay in Iowa City's Title I funds. There- fore, we should avoid excessive numbers of such recommendations. The Ames recycling project was discussed, and it was pointed out that Iowa City might limit its recycling program to, the separation of trash and the operation of a metal stamping machine. The Committee agreed to ask the City staff to research the costs of such a program. (A similar program in a small Minnesota city was publicized about a year ago.) The Committee received a memo from Julie Zelenka regarding General Revenue Sharing Funds, and discussed the possibility of. releasing capital improvements monies from General Revenue Sharing funds by funding the improvements under Title I, thereby releasing G.R.S. funds for social services. Sheran Matson reported on the progress of the community survey to be conducted next week. The pretest of the questionnaire will be completed this week, and the survey will include a random: sample of about 500 citizens. We shall attempt to enlist the aid of about 50 volunteers who will be trained for the survey at our Monday night, December 9, meeting. Sheran raised the possibility of paying for child care for resi- dents of Mark IV who are helping with .the pretest. The Committee agreed that this would be a legitimate, use of our surveying funds. Sheran also reported that the costs of keypunching should run about $100; the cost of computer time is uncertain. Sheran reported that the survey will, hopefully, be completed (including analysis) by December 21, 1974., ® Dan Rogers and Ira Bolnick reported on publicity efforts regarding the Committee's December 11 public meeting. Handbills have been printed up (5,000 at a cost of $62.50), and will be posted in grocery stores and laundromats, the dowtown area and around campus and on City buses. In addition, volunteers will distribute handbills at the Mall, K -Mart, Wardway, and Towncrest for a few hours on Saturday, December 7. These handbills are to publicize the December 11 meeting. Ira Bolnick and Thea Sando will appear on the Dottie Ray show on Tuesday, December 10, to publicize the meeting. Julie Zelenka will also issue press releases. It was decided that Ira Bolnick shall chair the public meeting, that a list of possible Title I projects (as included in our -letter to community organizations) be available at the door, and that City Council members act as observers rather than primary parti- cipants. REQUESTS TO CITY MANAGER FOR INFORMATION OR STAFF ASSISTANCE: Request to the City Manager and City staff to obtain information on the Minnesota recycling program. Respectfully submitted, ® Ira Bolnick Committee Member IB:mbm C E �J 0 Definition of Terms: 1. Supervisor and coordinator are synonyms. The title "ASERP Coordinator" can be used in this reference however, the title "Recreation Supervisor" is used in City personnel guidelines. 2. Recreation Leader is the title used for the persons hired to lead or instruct the activities at each location. 3. Permanent Staff refers to those City positions hired on a year-round basis and in most all cases full time. A. Current Plan (4 schools): $800-$900 This plan was in use this fall and last spring and called for an eight week program two days per week at each school. Personnel and material costs were approximately: 1. Supervision (no part-time supervisor in spring of 1974) included 8 weeks program and 2 weeks of post season work $300-$360. Should have had the supervisor on stream at least 2 weeks (12 weeks total time) prior to program start for necessary preparation. 12 hrs X 10 wks @ $3.00/hr 2. We had 4 leaders at 4 schools for 8 weeks. =$360 4 schools X 4 leaders X 8 wks X 1 1/2 hrs @ $2.50/hr=$480 3. Materials estimated cost about $50-$75. 4. Permanent staff time not charged but calculated with information avail- able: Superintendent -25 hours, one Recreation Program Supervisor -20 hours, one Naturalist -50 hours, clerical time not counted. (Assistant Superin- tendent also did sane preliminary work which we would guess at 20 hours conservatively since he contacted each school principal at least once, 0 11 prepared some written materials, interviewed and hired some staff). 5. Total cost estimated at $806-$891. The fee charged was $3 per activity participant with a maximum of 15 children per group. Our experience and consultation with staff indicated this to be an optimum number ofchildren per group for the caliber of activity leaders. This change was not sufficient to cover the costs of the program excluding permanent staff. B. Proposed Plan (13 schools) : $6110 In calculating costs for the future, we made the following recceimendations based on past experience and the proposed guidelines established by the ASERP Committee: 1. Planning and Organizing -to begin at least six weeks prior to first activity. a. One person, called the Coordinator or Supervisor with staff support (clerical and administrative) will work full time to prepare the work for 13 schools. 40 hrs X 6 wks X $3.00/hr =$720 2. Supervision by Coordinator -supervising the actual project for 8 weeks. a. The Coordinator of Supervisor will work on a full-time basis for 8 weeks. Two part-time supervisors will be required for 10 weeks. Scme full-time staff support will be required and will increase pro- portionately to the number of schools used. Permanent staff function: 1. Superintendent and Assistant Superintendent for hiring 000rdin- ator/supervisor, consultation on general plans and problems, administrative advice. 2. Three program supervisors serving as specialists for consultation and supervision of specific activities much as school special is u 3. Office secretaries to type and prepare printed materials such as schedules, class lists, program items, evaluations, reports, etc. b.. 40 hrs X 8 wks @ $3.00/hr (Coordinator) =$960 2 X 10 hrs X 10 wks @ $2.50/hr (Asst. Coordinators)=$500 3. Evaluation by Coordinator -evaluating the program could be done by coordinator/supervisor in change in one weeks time @ $3.00/tr=$120. SUPERVISORY COSTS =$2300 4. Recreation Leaders (52) should receive a minimnan of $2.50 per hour and should be employed for at least 2 hours per day to allow for sane preparation and clean-up time. Using this scale of $5 per activity day, numerous caabinations are figured. a. One 2 -hour activity once per week for 8 weeks plus 8 hours preliminary meetings, school conferences, lesson plan prepar- ation (24 hours per leader). 52 leaders X 24 hrs/ldr @ $2.50/hr =$3120 5. Supplies -we do not have accurate records on supplies since many of the items used were frim stock. school, we arrive at $650. Using our present key of $50 per TOTAL FOR 13 SCHOOLS=$6070 13 schools X 4 activities X 15 kids/class=780 children SUPERVISION $2300 LEADERS 3120 SUPPLIES 650 T6-0-70 A I . �p?1 pCOI ON7!I l"' M �MNN 1���pp1 H�,� i� yNy� '/, 1�•l1 O tr � H. pO ttAa. o1.H tlf N V `a U M IO N M h1 M N f1 S ['1 a ►1 : Oyu 1.1 77 M U M^f O f1 H yN t7 N M.t' < .0 iH a hl H �fl mi N r .ra zaY N H / Ns• YUy V �C y4 ;t�i;jl 4f 7 7 j �.t�•u 1M k�r�1�ca•�e x o n 0 0 � l D � td fi > P W A J Y U Y[ 1 yU p� W N r V V W p 1 P N U N .O W P• W? `� •' 1 a AV WM 1 co O W 0 I W III I L Iw Li %DO V Y O N O W OP w 00 r O . N N U U A O P •D ww PAO.D A W N WUAA •� P V V. o r = O I. I W O YON v I a W O w %0 N �1 't NW lJ V r AU D UVt� W O V N v P4 e U V CD O V V Y IC I � o DIY-• r rArn N rn NW r� 4 u r � %1 P w N V �D PP V W Oo CD w OD W w O N W .O OD V H oov WM oD r W FOOPMOv N W w•O PU W r CC •� ^ PO AY I A 0r.Om V P W Nr.O V rAUU N Y> Cnl-.NP Y U NUY OUNOD V N ONU Oo ODN N NNPV ID U V.O .OU O PO PONU.0 ADD P U 4tj n� P P V N N 0 c UIDN co Pi co A N N r � rl A.D U N P Y IO V N � J V N N r r r > N N N NPN P W N N A U O N P r C) v W N u Ow Am cow" rU U.nUU 00 v V PV La LA co 01 co N M 0 co NAN 0 0 V NOW b V NIM V O V D) NON W NPU W Co A O W v V W O W %0 00 V W .0 W Y• O A N m W r U Y r Kl Y• 0 .O � �OOA P N N.Or NYOU OU.D IO ID Co W � 0 <m 1'1 W W W M N N A U O W U N N U p v N N A I o V P W O Y F P Y o r rPOY A N CIO, N tH N co O V) M 1M N I V N w 00 A 0o W N A U V N W W N (Q co W N P VP Y U A A O p N W O D O P M r H h) O PMP / P Y M U v 00 N W / NAV W V V U IO P J V O P. A Y V Ip N A P .010 U N U W P W N P P W O VM01 W v V Y V P A w N V 1 NCe Oo V W P W 00 0 M O V co co .O A C b W •O N Y b o� V W W U N Y P U ' :4p V V U U Y ID O Y *00 W aD P Y O P m c v P � TI N N N r Y N W W O N O7 AW P V AA.D rC pp W +I PwrONtO C) Wo AOAtnrO i• o�r�.�.-•N mP mAo_vloo• �+n T M V U P W W O O .. O r Oo �O N N A V O VI V N W ID H O V O A w O 1 O �• N W O V .o N U I/I C` R P U C O V 0V IO" H ooP N ID ca o rU � H O U .p A P O• A � 19 No Io P.Or N ■ E Recreation Program and Services FY 76 * These activities were included in the January - June listing evaluated by Gommision in early fall. The attendance estimate in most cases has been updated to reflect the full year of 1973. Account 01611.0 General Supervision ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES Several services are performed by the office staff which are more than just the normal administrative routine. This work is currently done by the full time super- intendent, assistant superintendent and secretary, the permanent part-time clerk, the part-time evening receptionist and the part-time summer clerk. The tasks in- clude registering people for activities such as classes, travel trips,leagues, tournaments and other events; scheduling the use of the meeting rooms, the dark room, handball court, ceramics workshop, tennis courts, ball diamonds and picnic shelters; reserving and handing out sports and games equipment, santa suits, and a the recng reation items; making change; caring for lost and found items (a big job);and who use the Center with numerous requests from furnishing3to an answering service to audio-visual equipment. To better these service needs and dtopert rm the peveonnein- creasing clerical work load -brought on with expanding programs forms and record keeping I am -recommending that the permanent 3/4 time clerical position be made full time. This would enable the office to be open at 8 a.m. rather than 9 a.m. if so desired. * GROUP USE OF CE MR Many public groups use'the Center for meetings, parties, rehearsals, programa, etc. Groups affiliated with the Park and Recreation Department (Aero Hawke, Community Theatre, Do -Si -Do Club, Family Campers, Old Capitol Chorus, Iowa City Swim Club,Whitetail Bowmen, Babe Ruth Parents, Iowa -Coral Belles) are not charged. Most others are charged a rental fee as per Council resolution. Full and part time staff are involved as needed for maintenance, scheduling, etc. Groups set up their own rooms. Attendance estimate: 19,305 FIELD SUPERVISION A service provided for department sponsored and softOrganiball ed pleagues at s incl Happy Hollow and Mercer Park from mid May m, Mon - Fri - June & July Babe Ruth baseball - 190 boys age 13-15, 6 - 10 p. Mens softball - 500 men - 6 - 10 p.m. Mon. - Fr1.May - July Womens softball - 150 women - 6 - 8 P.M. Mon - Fri May - July Senior Boys softball - 60 boys:- 6 - 8 p.m. Mon & Wed June & July A part-time supervisor is hired for each area and the person at Mercer also does considerable diamond maintenance in preparation for play. Maintenance work is also performed for other groups using the general area for ball such as the girls softball league. Base and line equipment and material:is furnished. Attendance estimate: 7,858. Account 111612.2 Social Activities *GOLDEN AGE CLUB This program is not really a "club" but a social recreation program for Henior citizens meeting regularly on Tuesday and Thursday afternoon in the Social hall with an occasional special event and trip at other times. There is no participant charge although a "Kitty" contribution raises a small amount for coffee and refreshments. The group is directed by a volunteer with paid assistance from staff. Attendance estimate: 4,239 *TEEN DANCES This activity is not too popular at this time but in anticipation of revival staff remains alert to trends and desires of youth. Dances have been planned inside and out for several years with no or minimum charge to participants. The social hall in the Canter and the Mercer parking lot have been used. Planned by staff with paid part time supervision. Inside dances require 2 uniformed police. Greatest expense is for the band. Attendance estimate 553. Account 111612.3 Arts and Craftsp Drama. Hobbies *ARTS b CRAFTS CLASSES Organized group instruction is offered to youth and adults in a variety of subjects popular at any one point in time and limited by apace and equip- ment. A full time recreation program supervisor devotes considerable time to this activity with a 10 week session in the fall and another in the spring as well as a summer series. Classes meet once per week during the school year either in the afternoon or evening utilizing the craft room and the meeting rooms as needed. Some classes will meet outside occasionally. A proffessional trained instructor is hired for each class paid for by the participants. Participants also purchase their own supplies and most hand tools. An exhibit of work is held every spring. Attendance estimate: 2,125 11 • * CRAFT 6 PHo'rO ROOM USE The craft and photo rooms are made available to the adult public for a minlmum charge for supplies and special services during the hours when the Center Is open to the public and a class is not in session. Staff is encouraging this type of use as being part of our primary function. Attendance estimate: 727. W *FOOTLITERS A children's drama program which has not been too well received. Two different age groups of children from lower and upper elementary met one afternoon per week and finished with an original production for the public. A well qualified drama instructor was employed and parents were asked to help with costuming. A different approach should be studied for this program to be meaningful and progressive. No charge was made to participants. Attendance estimafe: 764. Account 01612.4 *ARCHERY Physical Activities - Recreation Center The rifle range in the Center has been use by the public. On Monday and Wednesday year supervision is employed to assist youth instruction is provided withoutcharge on an times when the Center is open to the public for archery. Attendance estimate: 1,209. * RIFLE adapted to permit archery evening during the school and adults. Equipment and informal basis. At other arrangements can be made The rifle range is open during public use hours of the Center. On Tuesday and Thursday evening during the school year a qualified supervisor is employed to assist youth and adults at no cost. Minors using the range must be accompanied by an adult except when supervisor is present and all minors must have a release signed by parents. Shells and targets may be purchased at cost and rifles are on loan at no cost. Attendance estimate: 1,166. *GYM 6 GAME ROOM -PUBLIC USE The use of the gym and game room and the exercise room as well as the rifle range is a major part of the service of the Recreation Division. Dur- ing the school year these facilities are open to the public and supervised about 75 hours per week. The hours with some group restrictions are generally from 11 a.m. to 10 p.m. Monday - Thursday; 11 a.m. to 12 midnight on Friday; 1 p.m. to 10 p.m. Saturday and Sunday. Part time staff is employed in varied capacities to assist the full time staff in the super- vision of the facility use. Evening and weekend staffs are usually 3 or 4 people to dispense equipment, teach as needed, discipline as needed, encourage participation, make change, handle first aid, perform janitorial tasks, answer questions and be, as -helpful to the public as time and duties 4 permit. One of our front lines of Public Relations. Activities possible are numerous but those generally taking place are: table tennis, pocket billiards, bumper pool, table games, TV viewing, cards, basketball, volleyball, roller skating, Jogging, exercising, tumbling and punching bag. These facilies are open to adults and youth 5th grade and older and younger children when accompanied by an adult. During June, July and August the Center hours are abbrieviated by closing on weekends. Hours are Monday - Friday from 11 a.m. to 4 p.m. and 7 - 10 p.m. The Center is also budgeted to close after the second week in August allowing time for major cleaning operations. The staff is limited to one 40 hour a week part-time person and one 30 hour part-time person. These people work quite independantly of the full time staff who are more than occupied with the responsibilities of the summer programs. Summer attendance estimate: 10,426 Full year attendance estimate: 65,407. * HANDBALL The public uses,the handball court for both handball and paddleball from 9 a.m. to closing on week days and from 1 to 10 p.m. on week ends. There is no participant charge and they must furnish their own racquets. The facility is scheduled a day at a time with a one hour limit. Attendance estimate: 49676 ® # A VOLLEYBALL FOR WOMEN The gym is opened for women to play volleyball on an informal basis Wednesday and Friday morning during the school year. No particular staff time is involved. A baby care service is provided during this time. Attendance estimate: 656 *BASKETBALL - SENIOR BOYS Sixty to eighty high school boys register without charge and are drafted by volunteer coaches on teams to play a schedule of games on Monday evening at the Center. Referees and score keepers are hired to officiate and the league program is organized and supervised by full time staff. Coaches schedule practice sessions throughout the season from late November thru February. Attendance estimate: 267. *BASKETBALL - SENIOR GIRLS Last year (73-74 season) probably because of the school varsity competition there were an insufficient number of girls registered to have a league. Funds are budgeted for this activity the same as for the boys. It is quite possible that as the interest grows in the city that the program will be revived. ® *BASKETBALL - MEN About 220 men play in two leagues at the Center on Monday and Wednesday evening November - February. Sponsored teams pay an entry fee to cover the cost of officials and trophies. The leagues are organized and supervised by full time staff. Attendance estimates 1696. U E E Two leagues open to all adult males playing at the Center on Thursday night November - April. Sponsored teams pay an entry fee to cover the coat of officials hired and supervised by.full time staff who also organize the league. Last season 160 men participated. Attendance estimate: 1446. *FITNESS - WOMENS CLASS A registered class including physical conditioning exercises and activities open to all adult women and meeting in the gym on Tuesday and Thursday morning January - March. A fee was charged to pay for a part time"instructor who was hired and supervised by full time staff. Women could attend either one or both days. Attendance estimate: 786 A6 4(PRE-SCHOOL GYM During the winter months the gym is open on mornings before 11 a.m. when activities are not in session for parents and organized groups to bring pre school age children to run and play in the gym. No particular staff involvement; equipment furnished by City. Attendance estimate: 262. 71 :UABY CARE A service provided in the social hall to anyone using the Center during the morning hours Tuesday - Friday. A charge of 50c per child is assesed to pay for sitters hired and supervised by full time staff. Playthings are provided by City. Attendance estimate: 748. *PADDLEBALL CLASS Open to all adult wewonwho paid a fee for instruction. Instructor hired and supervised by full time staff. Attendance estimate: 32. a1E*HUFFLEBOARD Open to all senior citizens on Monday a.m. in the gym during the winter months at no cost to participants. Supervised by full time staff as needed. Attendance estimate: 60. SPECIAL EVENTS Several special events are held by the Department during the year. Some are annual and some are not. Those conducted by full and part-time staff were: pool tournaments, family table tennis tournament, garden clinic, arts and crafts exhibit in cooperation with Iowa City Craft Guild`, synchronized swimming show, photo exhibit, Halloween costume parade, playground swim fest, playground track meet, playground pint size carnival, children's drama performance, playground field day, playground talent show, summer cultural arts series in City Park and a free throw shooting contest. Attendance estimate: 2179 *PLAY DAY This is a varied activity program open to all children in grades 1 - 6 on Saturday morning and public school vacation days October - April in the Center. Activities include crafts, table games, quiet games, active games, basketball, tumbling, apparatus play, roller skating, archery, air rifle target shooting and others. Part time leaders and supervisors art hired, trained and supervised by full time staff. Attendance estimate: 6748 Account 11613.1 Babe Ruth Baseball BABE RUTH BASEBALL A baseball league for boys 13 - 15 years. Jointly sponsored by the City and a parents organization which is affiliated with the Parks and Recreation Department and a national organization. The City provides the playing fields, supervision, umpires and liaison with parents board. Parks & Recreation Department staff prepares schedule, issues equipment and other misc. administration and clerical duties. The parents board provides uniforms, coaches, insurance and equipment ® (City provided equipment before 1974) The parents board raises money by donations, entry fee and concession stand. Fourteen teams with 190 boys play 98 games Mon. - Fri. evening at Mercer Park during June and July. Attendance estimate: 2,185 Account 61613.3 Winter Sports *ICE SKATING Open skating without charge to all citizens during season at City and Mercer Parks. Ice is maintained and snow removed by Park Division. Part time supervision is hired and supervised by Recreation Division during evenings, week ends and holidays. Warming houses are maintained and available during supervised.hours. Maintenance costs are not available and not reflected in program costs. Attendance estimate: 3337. *SKI TRIPS Open to general public who paid expenses for bus and skiing at Chestnut Mountain, Galena, I11. Part time and full time staff supervised. 18 Two trips. Attendance estimate: 124. An organized baseball program for boys 8 - 12 years operated entirely by a private, non-profit organization not affiliated with the Parks and Recreation Department. Games played at City Park in early evening during late May, June, July and early August. Fields maintained by Parks Division and City provides funds originally committed by Council for umpires. Attendance estimate: 7,000 Account 111613.5 Softball League Play -)K * GIRUS aFrBAt_ SENIOR BOYS A league activity for boys in grades 9 - 12 playing in the early evening at Mercer - Southeast area. Four to six teams, 60 - 80 boys supervised by part-time and organized full time staff. No fee charged and all equipment except personal furnished by City. Attendance estimate: 281 MEN Three - 8 team leagues with 500 men playing slow pitch -ball at Mercer Park and Happy Hollow during May, June and July both twilight and night ball. The program ® is organized by full time staff and supervised by part-time. City also provides lights and most equipment except personal. Team sponsors pay for officials and trophies. All teams must have at least 51% Iowa City residents. Attendance estimate: 4,371 WOMEN A six team league of 120 women playing fast pitch ball at Mercer Park in the early evening during June and July. The program is organized by full time staff and supervised by part-time staff. City provides most equipment. Team sponsors pay for officials and trophies. Attendance estimate: 912 Account #1613.6 Tennis TENNIS CLASSES Lessons are conducted for adults in the spring and for adults and youth in 3rd grade or older in two different summer sessions. All spring classes are held at City Park and summer classes are held at both City Park and City High. Classes are usually filled and the demand for adult classes is greater than we can meet during the evening hours. Instruction is limited to two of the six courts in order to allow space for public play. In 1973-471.oeople registered for the 10 lessons courses. The program is organized and supervised by the full time staff who hire part-time instructors. A fee is charged to pay for the instruction. ® Attendance estimate: 2,989. Account 111613.7 Football FOOTBALL A flag football program for fifth and sixth grade boys and girls playing on Saturday morning at 7 different locations with 14 teams. Organized and supervised by full time staff with part-time leadership for each group. A low key program to teach skills, sportsmanship and to enjoy the game. Attendance estimate: 1,683 Account 111613.8 Playgrounds ;K * PLAYGROUNDS A long standing summer program conducted in the various neighborhoods in the afternoons for 8 weeks. (This program was cut in 1974 by eliminating evening activities and some leadership.) A variety of activities are planned for 12-14 different areas using school grounds, parks and playgrounds. All activities are supervised ® by trained part-time leaders and include crafts, games, drama, stories, music, sports and special events. The program is geared to children in K - 12 grades but mostly appeals to,lower elementary. In 1973 - 1567 children registered. Part-time staff of 35 - 40 are hired, trained and supervised by full time staff who also do a great deal with program planning., Considerable equipment and supplies are needed to conduct this activity. Playgrounds open Monday - Friday. Attendance estimate: 24,419 Account #1614.1 City Park Pool & 1614.2 Mercer Park Pool PUBLIC SWIMMING These two outdoor pools are open from the close of school in early June until school re -opens in late August. The hours of operation for the public are from 1 until 9:30 p.m. although City Park was forced to close early in 1974 because floodlighting was not available. The pools are supervised by the full time staff and operated by a large part-time staff consisting of a manager, assistant, life guards, attendants, cashier and maintenance personnel. Attendance estimate: 113,379 SWIMMING INSTRUCTION (see #1614.3) COMPETITION (see 111614.3) r n LJ 11 Account #1614.3 Recreation Center Pool PUBLIC SWIMMING - Summer The Center pool is open to adults Mon. -Fri. from 11 a.m. to 1 p.m. and to the general public daily from 2 - 9 p.m. This schedule starts at the close of school in early June and continues until late.Auguat when school opens. The pool is supervised by full time staff and operated by part-time life guards. Attendance estimate: 21,454. *PUBLIC SWIMMING - School Year. The Center swimming pool is open to the public for a fee seven days a week at varying times. The hours are Monday — Friday 9 a.m. - 2 p.m. and 7 - 9 p.m., Saturday 9 - 11 a.m. and l - 5 p.m. (except when closed at 3 p.m. for scrim meets), Sunday l - 9 p.m. Part time life guards and managers are employed and supervised by the full time staff. Consider- able day time adult use is for lap'swimming. Many families use.the pool in the evenings and weak ends as well as mothers with pre school children in the daytime hours. Attendanceestimate: 38,541 *SWIMMING Group lessons are open to the public for a small fee to pay for instruction. Free instruction is available for low economic persons. Classes are offered during the week in the morning, afternoon and evening for pre-school children thru adult in all ability levels including life saving and synchronized. Qualified American iced Crone Water Safety Instructors are hired on -a part time basis and supervised by full time staff. Attendance estimate: 23,083 COMPETITION - SUMMER The pool is used by our affiliate the November - March; school teams from Regina High Schools; P.E. classes from Central Jr. use the pool from 6 - 8 a.m. and 3-- 5 p.m. Part time staff is only provided for masts afternoon. Attendance estimate: 8494. Iowa City Swim Club 5 - 7 p.m. (girls only), City and West 'Hi. and Regina. School teams Monday - Friday November - Feb. on Thursday evening and Saturday COMPETITION & PHYSICAL EDUCATION - SCHOOL YEAR Swim Club uses the Center pool from 6 - 8 a.m. and City Park pool from 8:30 - 11 a.m. Monday - Saturday. High School girl's teams use City Park pool and Mercer pool is used by Regina in late Augusut. In August and September Mercer Pool is used by P.E. classes from Southeast. Some use is also made of the Center pool by P.E. and special education programs from Central and Regina. Attendance estimate: 15,404 40 E 10 • Account 111615.1 Misc. Outside Activities GOLF A men's golf league is organized and supervised by full time staff for about 30 men. Matches are played during the summer at Finkbine course. Men pay an entry fee used for purchasing trophies and they also pay their own green fees. Attendance estimate: 200 TRIPS Numerous trips are conducted for the general public during the year such as canoeing, ball games, museum, caveing, horseback ride, etc. Organized by full time staff and led by part-time staff. Participants pay all costs. Attendance estimate: 172 FARMERS MARKET A farmers market is opened on Saturday mornings from July - September under the College Street bridge. Supervised by full time staff. No City expenditure. Attendance estimate: 4,575. Account 111615.2 School Centers *ASERP (After School Elementary Recreation Program) Four elementary schools scheduled for different activities for grades 1 - 6 for 8 weeks meeting after school. Activities include physical, arts and crafts and interpretive. Part time program directors are hired and supervised by full time staff. A fee is charged to pay for staff and materials used. Schools provide facilities without charge; City provides equipment. Attendance estimate: 1426. Expansion of the program is recommended to include all City elementary schools with 4 activities per week. Some full time staff administration and supervision. A 40 hour week part-time person needed to plan and supervise the program with assistance from 2 supervisors and a number of leaders. Fee charged to cover leader- ship and materials. *WEEKEND GYMS All elementary school gyms open on Saturday morning and afternoon for all elementary children to use for physical activities without charge. Southeast Jr. Hi. gym open on Sunday afternoon for all adults, Junior and Senior High youth without charge. Activities directed and supervised by part time staff. Full time staff hires and supervises. .City provides equipment. Open Jan. to April. Attendance estimate: 6103. n LJ * CFIRTSTMAS GYMS Four elementary schools and Central Junior High school gyms are open morning and afternoon for elementary, Junior and Senior High youth during Christmas vacation period for physical activities. No charge to participants. City provides equipment and part time program director. Full time staff supervisor. Attendance estimate: 441. *BASKETBALL LEAGUE - WOMEN A league open to all adult women who form their own teams and play on Monday evening at Southeast Jr. High School November - February. Sponsors fee pays for part time officials. Organized and supervised by full time staff. Attendance estimate: 312. *BASKETBALL LEAGUE - MEN A fast break league open to all adult males playing in teams on Monday and Wednesday evening.at West High School November - February. Sponsors fee pays for part time officials. Organized and supervised by full time staff. Attendance estimate: 514. * VOLLEYBALL LEAGUE - WOMEN ® A new program open to all adult women playing league games on Wednesday evening at Southeast Jr. Hi. School. Sponsors will pay an entry fee to cover the cost of the officials. Organized and supervised by full time staff. Attendance estimate: 720. `NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING C/ Notice is hereby given that the City of Iowa City proposes to rezone from RIA to M1 Zonp the following described property to -wit: Beginning at a point 512.5 feet west of the southeast corner of Section 21, Township 79 North, Range 6 West of the 5th P.M., thence north 3 deg. 42 min. east 124.5 feet to the point of beginning of the tract here to be described; From said point of beginning, thence north 3 deg. 42 min. east 125.66 feet, thence westerly along the southerly line of Lot A as shown on plat of survey of land in the southeast quarter of Section 21 and the northeast quarter of Section 28, Township 79 North, Range 6 West of the 5th P.M. according to the plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 4, page 344, Plat Records of John- son County, Iowa, 160.9 feet to the public road, thence south 49 deg. 13 min. west 113.85 feet thence south 11 deg. 31 min west 15 feet, thence easterly to the point of beginning. (Walden Construction Warehouse, 2650 S. River- side Drive) as requested by Charles Walden Notice is further given that pursuant to Section 414.4 of the 1971 Code of Iowa, a hearing by the City Council of Iowa City, Iowa, on the said proposed rezoning will be held at the Counc 1 Chambersin the City Hall of Iowa City, Iowa, at 7:30P.M.:on December 17 1 19 14 , and any person having objections to said proposed action may appear and file objections at said hearing. Dated at Iowa City, Iowa this Noyember':30 1974 City Clerk Publish once November 30 19 74 Denied by P&Z � �' �v� NHOSEOT TEMS RELATED APPL!QANTOURINCE THIS IS .APPLICATION(S)CAREPTOHBE SF LLED PLICPLE SET YPEOOR PRINT NAME OF APPLICANT: ADDRESS: 33SN1 Charles R. Walden 730.E. Bloomington St. 33 97 NAME OF DEVELOPMENT: AqA—SoZfE an acre PRESENT RIA ZONING SjREETSADj?1R� ?RePfl9,P ffTY LOCATION: ZONINGMl OWNER ADDRESS:. PHONE: Charles R, Walden 710 E Bloomington St. 338-1297 ATTORNEY: ADDRESS PHONE: ENGINEER: ADDRESS: PHONE: i OTHER: ADDRESS PHONE: UM TYPE OF APPLICATION ✓ PLEASE CHECK 1, ,Six copies of preliminary plat REZONING FROWR� <rs >>< ".>'Y 2. Six copies of final plan TO: Ml 3. Reproducible & 5 copies of final plan >'> SUBDIVISION "' f>>,y: >:v 4. Location Map PRELIMINARY PLAN ' ' SUBDIVISION " `{ `f<. 5.Legal Description ' FINAL PLAN `,,, k<�' <` 6. Dedication of land for public use }`> LARGE SCALE RESIDENTIAL ' " , 7. Resolution for approval by Council PRELIMINARY $. Legal papers consisting of: ' LARGE SCALE RESIDENTIAL ''.:: a. Attorneys opinion FINAL; b. Encumbrance bond certificate LGE. SCALE NON-RESIDENTIAL' "'"' C. Statement of County Treasurer PRELIMINARY. �f.. �, s « d. Statement of Clerk of Court `LGE. SCALE FINAL NON-RESIDENTiAL @. Statement of County Recorder !•:..i�1fi f o q' PLANNPRELIMINARYOPMENT:.r<2%/>r, f f. Statement of Owner & spouse </ , v g. Waiver of paving ;n'« PLANNED AREA DEVELOPMENT , h• Certificate concerning improve- ... ? FINAL r$;r ,:::Y ments #4> PLANNED COMMERCIAL ""'-'~''t'' 3%''`' 9• Existing site plan ZONE 10. Development site plan A.} N?; 11. Statement of intent by developer VACATINGS 12. petition to pave abutting streets .� 13 Report on economic feasibility ANNEXATIONROM, 14. Report on effect of PC on surrounding 44 sib 7:s,, property :�•15• Report on impact of traffic by PC on surrounding streets FOR OFFICE USE ONLY 16. seven additional copies of plat are desired but not required FILE NUMBER: Z - j ,2 FEE PAID: AMOUNT DATE wnm THIS IS AN APPLICATION APPLICjgION ACCEPTED BY.: D th FORM ONLY. A LISTING NAME DATEC) OF OTHER SUBMISSION 0 C I MATERIALS MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE "�f';:•f,-:?%f:7:%/::•fi:: ''��,•/ter-.: >: /,f:��!fi'�fG'%/��/f,,fl ;'�. %�:{;mof/i�' i,/✓;ft,f`f%� l°/":�f...'.?�ii:f:f,.�t<r>Yvf�i:,�%�l//`f"'f.:/•..''/�l..• :�.��},,y'!�Y,�i„i.f`Ff•S�if:'/>:r��k.:•f:.y�f•:b. ;%f/f.'r,�• /.f•�f%'f/.fYfl� :a � F�,a � R..S T O ` U S PLANNING DIVISION. CITY CLERK M�NN l V BLUE:APPLICANT FiVID G'yu' �1 ALA,-- -- If FULL PREPARED By . I-vact coya, � � p Of jolq soNi COITI�TT�', fl�VA �.bSLratt of ?,�tjQ to the following described premises, situated iu Johnson County, Iowa, to Wit-: Be -ginning at a point 512.5 feet west of the southeast corner of Section 21, `township 79 North, Range b hest of the 5th 42 min. east 124.5 feet to the point of P.M., thence north 3 deg. 'beginning of the tract here to be described; From said point of beginning, thence north 3 deg. 42 min. east 125.66 -feet, thence w-sterly along the southerly line of Lot Ass shown on plat of survey of land in the southeast quarter of Section ganaed6t�est he of northeast quarter of Section 28,1orrnship 79 North, g the 5th P.M. according to the plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 1F, page 344, Plat Records_ of Johnson County, Iowa, _160._859 feet to the public road, thence south 49 deg. 13 min. west 113.feet thence south 11 deg. 31 min. west 15 feet, thence easterly to the point of beginning. , 1- part of COagresaloaal Town. Johnson County, Iowa, is situated is the south East Johnson Pam of Iowa and cotzs;sts of a p ship 77 anau o ess 5—&7 Snd 8 West of h Fifth established Merid n which 1s eemblishad moutht m the m uth Of the Ar;causaa, - Arlrausaa Iitv,t. A SECTION OF LAND --W. ACRES ;A rod i3 16?=- feet. A chain is 66 feet or 4 rods or 100 links. A link is 7.02 inches. A mile is 320 rods, 80 chains, or 5,280 feet. A square rod is 272% square feet. An acre contains 43,560 square feet. An acre contains 160 square rods. An acre is nbout 208% feet square. An acre is 8 rods wide by 20 rods long or any two numbers (of rods) whose product is 160. 25,cI25 feet equals .0717 of an acre. CEDE Sectional DUP of a Township t With Adjoining Sections A SECTION OF LAND --W. ACRES ;A rod i3 16?=- feet. A chain is 66 feet or 4 rods or 100 links. A link is 7.02 inches. A mile is 320 rods, 80 chains, or 5,280 feet. A square rod is 272% square feet. An acre contains 43,560 square feet. An acre contains 160 square rods. An acre is nbout 208% feet square. An acre is 8 rods wide by 20 rods long or any two numbers (of rods) whose product is 160. 25,cI25 feet equals .0717 of an acre. CEDE Sectional DUP of a Township With Adjoining Sections 3G 31 333 34 35 36 31 1 6 5 14 13 2 I l l 6 12 17 I 8 I 0 110 111 112 17 t• 13I is 17I16I15I14I13 x aee :, t o 1S 24 10 20 12l 122 123 12.1 19 25 30 120 12S 127 12f, 125 30 32 I'33 13-t 1 35 1 36 1 31 1 6 5 4 13 2 I 1 G &0 rods 80 acres 20 chsiry OF SECTION le chains 330 it. t- 5 acres t r acr" '' TO rix.s ch. 20 acres t• .. io x aee :, t o ` 10 ex. • t 660 feet 40 ncr a V �1 Y 1.520 feet �k se<tiw Corner 100 scree do chnias. 150 reds or 2.$40 fc,t SEi7ItITY ABSTRACT COiY MANY, IO :VA CITY. Ifl rVA •: R�•k�j..+;� L �iyCi�t� f. r 2 - 2` r � �.1�xY` � S y Y + ✓ � ' 'y .!s . of Plat of a survey for J. S. Charles, �:pril 4, 1873_ Recorded April 11, 1873, 3ook 36,pGoe 322. Survey of E- SE Sec,21 & Nr NEz Sec.28 and Lots Sac,22 and Lot 8, Sec.27, all in Twp, 79 111.9 R.6 : ... .. ..�...___..__-•.�.,,n..o-,�...--__ �._r•��- •^. .-s�� a '^"^� _+� —�.— — — _ � l� �l .J L. i /> C> �' 7 S CC GD"r r+p Plat Book 4, page 344. 1y T y Y C LW Sits' f S F Cu_ 25"m ; I %S'- C. z 0 3 n m O OZA: n • mm 0 ro n O O m z 0 �/E y5cc.z8-�y-6 I.,.ES 1gr-. " 14 J -- �7 7o.140 FCC, 7o.140 7?!- C • .Y se 11 Y 1 y� -ts.- z 7 7.4 2 �, onfi 3s�— �o70L/ s4rc2a7�6� 1.4 I- 0 0 `2 y X f ii ;f Plat Book 4, gage 344. �/E y5cc.z8-�y-6 I.,.ES 1gr-. " 14 J -- �7 7o.140 FCC, 7o.140 7?!- C • .Y se 11 Y 1 y� -ts.- z 7 7.4 2 �, onfi 3s�— �o70L/ s4rc2a7�6� 1.4 I- 0 0 `2 y X ii ;f Plat Book 4, gage 344. - _ r. '3 y�..t_ t �--.S..r �—�-�c'.M'Tw�•�Tr.�rvif-F.•. �...—._i._ r ��� fi>.. '_f 3 - '- • � ! -•_ _ ?� z to - �. .a r _': -.i s: _ -u .1«� PERSONAL STATEMLMTS FROM COMMISSION MEMBERS A1_chough I consider all three proposals for the Low Income housing Project to be more than acceptable, I believe the Old Capitol Proposal is more closely aligned with the ideas I have in mind for the project. Therefore, I recommend that we urge the Council to accept their proposal. I wholeheartedly support Mrs. Branson in her endeavors to make Iowa City a better place in which to live, through her very capable handling of the position of chairperson of the Housing Commission. 0. - Mildred Bosserman Member Su,T�rested Criteria to Employ in the Evaluation of Proposod Senior Citizen Low -Rent Housing The r..ommcni;s lwhich I am about to make are my own and have not; been endorsed. by the entire Housinz Commission, nor. have I s0ug�h t i_' -s =indorsement or the endorsement of any indi_v_idual and/or. any : 1'Oup. I find it necessary -to slake this statement in order -to brinJ; Ct f•or•,� -the public the real issues which the housing Commi ;;;1.011 h; s failed to deal with and ,yet which have had a si.-nifi.cant iiii-pnet on the process of evaluation for the three proposed senior citizen I ousing projects. ( 1) In-1d..-quacy of criteria employed for evalua.t:i.on Although we have available to us -the LHA checklist, which you have seen -today, this .form is totally inadequate as a basis for ;Selecting- the best proposal. It is a process -oriented form containin- at least 10 questions (out of approximately 30) wllicll request cc 'tification of the fact that certain documents have been subini l -ted. This type of question and most of the questions on the LHA checklist do little -to get at the :real issue - HOW ArPROPRIAT11 ARF 1'Hi;SE UNITS AS A HOIrIE FOR SENIOR AND H:?NDICAPPl D? I t is this point for which wC, have no suhs-tan4.i.rtl cr'i teria. The only assistanceoffered us by the nous;-11� Ili rector wh as se sur;gest:l on that we conform ourselves of the cOn"te"ts of 1:11(, r,?gill l'?11?11ts contained in the fV'ini mum Property Vii: 11 _r d;_ and 'tho ti..on2 Housing Assistance PaymentsI'ro�7r�m -_ i�nw _onsi:ruCi:i on _ro:-ram :i�lndbook. Of course these documents are helpful, but 0111\1 t0 <? Ct>rt3ill el'tent. The 1'+T'rS are building and physiCa.11_\r Or; ni:i'd it:i:Ont address.ino- itself -to the human factors. I thin'.c th-t an evaluation process based 011-1-Y on these ca i.`eri.a is entirely too narrow and provincial. Granted, the not been revised thus far, but HUD as of .last Au--ust, _ _o " 1i ed the i-moortance of goin`r, beyond a mere eval.ua.tion of ''':3 cuilding -to look at the prorram and services -to be COnt,3ln��(l n r x oi�osed hou:; in;- developments. As stated in the l:7r5, these rc lair r�enia are only minimal and -there is nothing which shnu)d restrain the LHA from setting_;- higher goals for itself. Therefore i.y Point is that -the Housing Commission should have set hirfher st:lnd gds fur itself instead of beim; discourag-ed to do this 1-1 't iousill Director erd :-ome Housinz= Commis -ion -aeml,er. s. C t,C `il-it !Iie Cit.v `.'ouncil r,--pond6 t0 '�.I1e 1,'O,i�^r trio.. nI h01:: ;1,_ t.il t1 a 1•,uil��'in, but •,.; a hone and a s,,t of se- ;•io,^, mrd a71 :,'.ace There poo --,le live! not die. -21 n -.,'r-��,r 1 U.L- e vaiva-tl on Al.t.hou,-h the Housing Director and the Housing Commission i'oll.o; ed the straight and, narrow path in this evalua.ti_on prose::: i leave tried to look at this in a broader context and therei'nrc , :r^ considered 5 factors to be of trtntos t i.r:portance in i:en t, i;i vc.7 , '--Olec tin,; a developer. ('r-) Financial feasibility 1v r. eason for starting here is because the proposal mist hi � .10 -to r.;,ke it financially if 1ow-income eeni.or citizens jnd h �ndic<api�ed persons are going; to be assured of -the ava.ila.bi_li ty o tl!C-e units. The usual procedure is that a complete fi nand ci. t .is not required it this point, a.nd therefore tha t mesal ilou-ing Authorities rarely consider the herefore hat o=' pror,oaals before them. It is common kno:led,c -that itsy ride throu h the typical IHA and, why not,when .i ibni very l.itt:1C information is required. and when commission members led ar councils are inexperienced in housing_;_ matters. All three d0velopels havecommentedon the scope of our questions and al.l i that they have never before had to submit so much de-thij t',:is early in the process. I think this accounts for Old C :iii t;tl's Llure -to submit a complete financial statement even when 2.•c- cluested by the LHA (because they don't have to) and for the al:Iles scs contained in -the Knutson statement; (because u: vaIly -hc GHA .and the developer do not consider it -to be a'serious' -:nd realistic s1:a.te7nent at this early date). After explaining the developer's point of view, i{ ; s tic�ee,:,,try to e ,plain t;i13i I think should be the point of view of the }-lou:>i nr: C07MIssi.on and the 1JHA. Althourrh, supposedly, it is not our r^'>[:onsi.bi.lity at the local level to dertl seriously with this matter -1 l cannot liel.p thinking how absolutely fool i h altar is. There:t'orc, T >u,r�;est that the folloviinC items be .t:hou711-tfully considered fortirardincr our tentative selection to ;-IUD. 1, Compare the cost per unit and the cost per square ioo-i: for each dwelling unit with the cont0nts of each N•:ith special reference to land costs, siteTlYi. r. �rovrt cnt: pe O1 building proposed, building ,•race and i 1 cl.ud-.ns- provi-ion for service areas, unit. space nd -Floor t�1 ns, design and architectural trea-':m91,t, reT1+1 P ld THS; SUiTABILITY OF THE PROPOSAL FOR SEiI:LOR tD H_NDICAPPf�D PERSONS. $"pat will be "the impact (n the Knutson proposal -if i_-L- i,"clud.es air conditioning ; what ;vill be the impact on {'� Old Capital- proposal if it Ccr.�n?lies ;:,ith reque: `s nlarFe the units, rearranzl;e a kitchen t,:all, provi ?o --other laundry room , more storac-e ;ease, and mor(? oj' Mix of bathtubs and shot:,ers, and t^hat Will be the P::i dstates' proposal i -,-it complies ;vith requests -to r'0 :mane~e a kitchen wall. and ,rolkri.de a mix of bathtui ti (.:l,ich need -to be made more accessible) and There are g ring discrepancies anion;" cost fit ures 1yhir_h require careful attention. The Housing -Commission has not been provided with any expert` advice= o1i. this .issue. We have been" moi,r. ::illinc- to speculate and gossip about the 'financial feasibility of the proposals rather than seek or request hard corcjfaci:s from 'he "experts"'. I hope the City Council will. not feel 'threatened b,r not h -wing immediate knowledge on -this point, but ]:rll do i t I- to seek -t:he requisite assistance in order to make -an objective valuation. (b) Unit plans Since last July when Iowa City received tiJord of the a.l Loco ti i>n of 62 units Of low -rent hou:<ing, "the Housing Director. has tliore ::ar; little the Housing; Commission would need tc coral i.dei i n evaluating; -the proposals except -to certify their conformance with r!ini.n?um HUD requirements and special THA requ:i.rem�nts. He frenuontl.v rar_inded the Commission and the elderly that no one ,,:as go- to bu'ld lu:rury apartments, that only low -rent housing 1a;oinr to F- built. He further reminded the Commission and those i.n att:encinncc 2.1, Commission meetings that there ]:rare few alternatives available U-) be considered in the quality of desiLn, both interior and exterior. r!_s sur,rresti_on was to f;o down to the library and look -t}.rou^'h a i �_-a b -sic floor plans because they were all alike. This LO me tli it low -rent housing must be plain with a minimum number Or fea.ture:s and most disgusting, that poor seniorci.-ti ..cr.s and. `inc'.4aned do not e deserya bet -o 1•• r. ^^t 'iCn a.t they :•ccently a Housing Commission mrr;l'• r, ':O t my-, l.f, -t-hat he thought one of the most imuor- LI -lit -Lhin_-s •::e should conider In our evaluation is the layout arad interior aIIl:l or each unit. I find it saran e that in the 1 • t i.7s been down -played and an implicit denial b,y ^op;e Con77 :;i.on ^ 'rib•ert as having little significant bearin:_; on 011r eva_lual;ion. Keening in mind that my base line for evaluation has 1 -eon i opp,nPRIATE ARE: THESE UNITS AS A HOI,'_'E FOR SENIOR, CI7.'IZi_?NS !LINT) 1:__ HANDICAPPED, I think the floor plans do have sig-nificart b::a ring on the evaluation. Therefore I su`-;est that Co1;nCil 11Ci;1oers c^n` ider the following factors when lookin:- at 't.).e a :)u rtr•,ents : 1. 'otal apartment floor space (net or gross) . 2. Furniture to be contained with in, the apartmen-ts - ow does older furniture of most seni.vr citizens with furniture sizes shown on floor pl^r1s (I'UD's minirnl.m sized furniture)? Ifthe furniture is lair -e and bull:v how, will this effect convenient and com>>or-table accc :;:; and mobil. ; t::- with in the unit by a person •;hose m1�' c r unci : �nsory functions may be impr.i^etz'? 3. ccess -to kitchen and bathroom - Ts there comfortable and convenient access, includin,- t• 7'n :round space for wheelchairs? Hei ,-ht of kitchen roes a person in a �:heelchair have convenient acce:;-: 1, the sink, facilitated by open space beneath? 7„11at ?bout access to medicine cabinet and other stora,e - above shoulders when seated or at shoulder level? }'c�1,• accessible are tubs and showers, lavatories, .-.rid toi It tc:? corm. nors : -; wnaT are -the and within;`.them?. y located. in bathrooms -.and sizes of doors into apartments, z�. Flexibility of dwelling space over -t:.i_me - What happens -to the person who is mobi..l.e c.;ho?� triki.n« c;n residence in one of the=se units, but then temporaril.,y or permanently needs vialking assistance or a l:,lcelch;cir? Will. -t-he lack of .f.lexibility within the uni-1; (deli. :natc,d only Por mobile persons or handicapped persons vs, c•np:ac. i'ty to provide comfortable and convenient access i.n -,)I for senior citizens and -the handicapped) force to move? (Studies indicate that moving by .Den.ior ci.It;i.scns considerably shortens their lifespan..) Or flexibility within units by movable walls r. eli eve -the monotonous uniformity of the apartments, thereby promoting individuality in a multi-residcnti.al. at;mo:,t ilern, as well as meet the needs of the elderly w;iich char. -e over tame. 5. Amount and location of storage and knick knack :3pc3.CL- available wit:lin -the auartmentq. 6. Location of windows and view while se. ted - tvhai: floor? Are they easy to from beneath the window a sittins- position'? capability for provi.di.n ; ,13. are heights of windows from the open? Does anything: protrude thereby impairing. -t-he view from 7. Attention f�ri.veri to li �Thting and sound conditions - 'Uhat h-.� s been done to reduce glace from r:iruiocs <znd 0 -'LI -ter surfaces (in order to red.__ce falls) and to reduce :?udi.t.ory distractions? (c) i''anagcment - tenant relationship Perhaps the most difficult factor -to evoLlua t:e ,!t this t,oi.nt. ye the most crucial, I think, is assurinf, a hi_^;h o jtc>. ; i ty li vi n'- e„vi.ronment is *the attitude of the manacxoment; toward -thc tcn,lr-t. I s,_igc;est that -the City Council_ read each mana,_;ement: l,lan .in nr;ic�r to ^et a feel for management attitude, A proposal can 11`lv:l 1_111 the .fine features it %-rants, but ulti m-1.tely i t: is the r elat i (n;:ll.i-,) between management and tenant which crakes a project: a hone. A recent article in the Journal of Property A3rag;er.;c:nt i.ldi.c;lt:�:; thli; .0is pore than preventative maintenance merit?res emi)loycd, but. the quali t:y of management's response to tenants' in-n-ter.ance nes cis; arld the attitude of -the manager and staff of the deve)_o-,nre;lt ';ri,icil fIoster a Supportive environment, I rc.co,-nize ��.hat the Trl :.naC.ement of any real estate is a business, yet: the sense of responsibility -toward his apartment, respect residents, and promptness of rental payment are a func-tion of the r�narement's attitude, I hope that Whichever proposal i - ., -ti�-cln_v <1elected, fila t the n?a;la cement �ril.1 not deal in a paternal_i.;:i:i c with the residents, but rather that it respects the tenants JK _ (d) Services The fourth factor that I looked at in eval.uatinr these proposals wr is -the services proposed -to be located in or as:_ ociatod %J,th each development, or "the potentiality :for the nrovi.sion of services. liorr much Space is allocated for service functions and r:lha."l. Id-nds of services will or could be available? Where are the spaces located within the structure? Are they centralized as i.n t}le -t.yDical downtown/residential relationship, or are they ilenentral.izcri, similar "to a ne p;hborhood concept of urban life? '..hat.trn-)act noes -this allocation and location of services have on tho qualit_ of life 1•r.itliin each proposal? ', ho i%,ill have ultirnate rest on:-ibility .for the _furnishi-ngfs, staffin- .^.nd coordi-nation of hhr e �.c ti, ri-tries'? !:71a i planninf (d i.rect contnct cri.l:h senior no Ci ,-Jtac t) lhaS One into pros l.dii Or i.Ce3 rrhi_c}l 1-,(,. t t:heneeds orf the handicapped .and : reni.or citizen? 01 determined. what -the needs of these people were in the f ii:-st Place - n%rchi tects, enginc,ers or prospective residents -1_111emselves? The City Council_ Is very aware, I knob., of the importance of hrvi n- clients speak fo.r thowselves rather than havin,; the decision - r -slicer. n s::,urs n ':o ki;ow what tho e needs are, (e) Attention to plannin,r for senior citizens and the handicarped The la -,-t f .ctor rhi.ch I considered to be important -in this, evaluation is related to the previous factor ,just discussed. ?l. attention h -s been . iven thus -far to pllnnihhF for the See-cial ne,3C: Of the handl.c2?lhled nlhd our senior cit=z�cns? _I have been esi-ccially 1i pi-cssed ,kd th one developer's trea.l:ment. of 'tills factor bcc�,.u-e it was something offered which was not required nor %,,-U l it be reouired in later steps of evaluation by HUD or by the .LEA. Plarnin in the residential setting based on user -need studies is a ccnrli_nr thin-. It's been discussed in a theoretical context fpr ac, a t: n decade, but ho.s sel.domly been applied. A--ai-=-Inc' thnt al.til n-i.nkles can be ironed out, here i_s an opportunity for "the C0,11 ci.l not only "to do something `to remedy the phy:-;ica.l, re.-i.dential environment and foster a hi lh quality of life for 7_crI income c101U(T_ citizen= of Iowa City, but also -to place Ioloa Cite in :he ran}ts of pro ;ressive, •'lction-oriented, and foin-Ja'd-l.00kin- '_'his concludes my sv�---,est ions f:-�r which criteria to utilize in ._: lluatillr t -he housing proposals Before Aou. My final concern is ':rich the barj-ainin,7 t}iat Ij feel Should be conc'ucted, with the ci.l:V Pt:orn(,Y,s Colina;,I, T�ric'r to forwardlnfr the tontative select;loll to iiJD. I tins inlable, -to convince a major-ity of the Hollsin� Conml.Ssi on lnt`iiil,erS of this Ur= ency of this poin-t, blit 11921l.eve that if illi Col7mir;;ion members Thad read t=hrough al.l -the m:lt. ri-al sub- 1^itted b.,r t1ho developers, they might be more wil.lino_ to join mr' i.n this ur'F S"t1011, Once tale LH l slg-nS anything, i_ts levera�_'-e -is C -l-c .ely 5• onkened. It. is clear, I hope, t=hat all tiroposal.S .re 71n F�tisfa(-,--tr or as i:>, but that with some alterations, l:e -:ould all '.)e -ble to rest easier knowing that we have c=one file best lve c:?ulrl, t'lla,.k ou for consi_derinf this letter. '.lderl.y Hoiising Project Because of a sudden illness in my family, I was unable to attowd the isi:;S Commission's 5aturday work session -,..,here Sections A throno-hlb o_' e LEA checklist were voted upon. I would, t'nerefore, like to enu1,16 S e those items where my vote would have differed from the mn jority: Old Capital Associates 2.c. Recommend inferior. Unit plans for the handicapped were not shown. 2..d. Recommend adequate 3.b. Recommend NO Knutson Construction 2.d. Rcco,Timend superior. The Knu-son Company has spent a great deal of time considering architectural xrangements as they effect the mobility of the tenants, as well as, anile of sunlight, exterior appearance, vier from windows, and the tenants psychological environment. J-dstates 2.c. i4ecom:rend inferior. Unit plans for the Inandicaaned not shown. Anon reviow, of the scores received by each sponsor from the L:HA check- list,Midst.-;tes' were lower than eith :r Old Capital cr Knutson's ;•:hich ;sere re]attvely '.he same except that rents in the Knutson project are br-low the -naxi.ni-.im figure published in the Invitation for Proposnls. Section F; covered c?ur:in� the Sunday work session (for which I was present) was rn a'_'-.e-Iot to rurt.i,er distir.l-uish the three proposals. I am somewhat disanrointed ::nd frustrated at the fact that the Commission was not able to est.ablish critoria for c ,;Tulation which inight be more useful to the Council in meki.n; t?'ei.r d,=c In i on. In the final recommendation I voted for the Knutson Co:aoany ;;reject. While I was very impressed with the design of the project and the effort out forth by Knutson architects I frankly feel that all three projects fall short of tho Con;.7lission's ex .:ctations prior to the Invitation for Proposnls. 1 •;m oarticulnrly disappointed that the sponsors of the Knutson project ;:ere nit : hle to extricate t"e:tselves from apparent political comrlicat _c -'s 1:1 ; r'0r to provide :pore than 64 units. This, however, is a personal preference. i voted for tine Knutson project precisely because a sizeable number of elderly neopie asked ne to vote for it and the following is an explanation of tliFlir reasoning. The elderly- w! -o contacted me, although reluctant to speak in large have been followin:E U planning and review process sinco its bei-.innin�s. The have e�-nressed a ,reference for the Knutson project because; 1) the lc,cat.ian is preferable to Old Capitals. They prefer to betan- town, ho,. -ever find even Piidstates location and proposal preferable to that offered by Old Capital Associates; 2) all. unitsin the Knutson plan are accessible to handicapped and/or tc.:eporarily disabled people; 3) 11a11w.zys are not long nor "institutionallf 4) more units contain showers than the others ;•:hich is vitally important tho oldor the tenant becomes and consequently the less mobile he bec(mes; 5) there are several extra rooms tahich can be usod for other a.cti..=ities, _.^., library, greenhouse; 5) the rooms are much larger than any of the other plans; 7) extra parking for handicapped is provided; S) they consider it.a plus to have a building c•rith just ctder-].y people in it even if all the elderly are on subsidy; ?) window boxf`s are favorable and air condi.ti ming is not an i. sue. in addition, although there is some feelingthat Project Graven does not want Chauncey S;•:an Plaza destroyed, the elderly. persons .rho contacted me did not. consider this a valid d.eterant to the project for two reasons; i) to their kno:•rled;e Froject. Green has not issued a motion or recommendation to that Effect and 20 the 1-andscave plans for the Knutson project seem to ti!c,M to en: St -.cement by: Fredine Branson, Chairperson Io.,m. City Housing; Commission On behr?.lf of the Housing Commission, I would li..e to th n'_l- �.11 three of the developers for their title r.nd ex�menne involved in the orepa.ration of proposals -to construct ^rid the 62 subsidized units for the elderly mad irn.nd:i_c".npcd. Ey vote of 5 to 2 the Housing Commission h,, -.s endorsed the -»,o_")os^l of Old Capitol. I nerson^lly supported Old Capitol's nro•)osal nr=i_mr.ri.ly bcCn.ttr;e it :-rent beyond the 62 units r.nd pr.•o'io: ecI to build ^.n a('.dition^.l 38 non -subsidized unite to b^ rented -A. the -P.ir ri:-.r'•_et price to the elderly and hn.ndicam)cd. Also, I ^.m comm tied to long-term plamaing for, down -lo\•. -n Iov::-. Cite -.nd �- ou1d not litre to see the previous ,ilnns for clef e1o;�i 1 the i'_rec-bloc': novcrnmcnt^1 --)lnzn. reversed. U- CIVIC CENTER. 410 E. WASHINGTON ST. `!����� `'// `�/�(�� • /!�'C� IOWA CITY. IOWA 52240 319-354.1800 December 16, 1974 The Honorable Mayor and City Council Members Civic Center Iowa City, Iowa 52240 Dear Council Members: The Design Review Committee endorsed the Old Capitol Plan by a vote of 7-0 at a meeting on December 16, 1974. We do this because we wish to keep the Chauncey Swan Plaza as an open space as related to the historic plan of Iowa City designating this area as Farmers Market. We will qualify our 7-0 vote with the following state- ments: The building to be built should fit the Iowa City area with suitable and varied materials with a richness Of color and texture. The scale and color should be related to St. Patricks Church and the new Post Office which are red and dark brick, respectively. There should be an aesthetic approach to the outdoor space to fit into the neighborhood with greenery and planting. scale and design of the building should be compaThe tible with St. Patricks Church and the U. SPost ing which are adjacent to this proje. Office Build - should be built to conserve energy which will be more scarce in the future. We also wish to work with the Old Capitol builders as to the interior design. Specifically the size of each apartment, as we would like to see the apartments larger even if this means fewer of them. In relation to the community rooms, we think these should be designated as to their size and use. Very truly yours, 7 :�4fl -7 AiiZ Tom Wegman �/ Chairman TW/nh Branson Bosserman Old Capitol Associates Claypool Old Capitol Associates Fountain Knutson Old Construction Capitol Associates Retish Sheets Old Capitol Associates White Knutson Construction Old Capitol Associates It was agreed to call this a qualified vote of 5-2 since no one in the majority was completely satisfied with any one proposal. STAFF SUMMARY in an effort to summarize the many items that were considered and evaluated for each; proposal and to facilitate reaching a decision the following major items are discussed. A. Site. The location of the Midstates Project is such as not to meet the requirements in the invitation. Both Knutson and Old Capitol satisfy this requirement from a distance point of view. From an accessibility point of view both sites have major barriers separating them from the downtown area. Old Capitol has Burlington Street, Knutson has. Gilbert Street and the hill mass. Old Capitol's building is removed from Burlington Street by approximately 130 feet with a earth berm and planting screen. Knutson's is bounded on the West by Gilbert and on the North by Washington with no possibility of screening to reduce traffic noise. The staff rates the sites in the following order: First - Old Capitol Associates Second - Knutson Construction Third - Midstates Development B. Building on the site. The building proposed by Midstates does not meet the invitation for proposals -- that is it is Type V construction versus type I. IIorrevcr, it is appealing in that it is not stacked housing. Old capitol's building is seven stories in height and will to some extent stand out in the area. It is just across the alley from Et. Patricks Church and across the street from the new Federal Building which will reduce this factor. The Knutson building is nine stories in height and will stand out. Surrounding buildings are considerable lower and it is believed the`.sheer height of this building will cause it to stand out and perhaps not be appealing from this viewpoint. The staff rates the building/site combination in this order. First - old Capitol Associates Second - Knutson Construction Third - Midstates Development C. Habitability and amenities. There is little doubt that the Knutson proposal contains more space within the units and much consideration was given to the design from the ,-menities stand- point. However, space is not the only factor f -c consideration. The view from ones window, the air temperature, and physical layout must also be considered. The amenities to be provided are important, however, it should be remembered that this -2 - building is to be considered as home for these occupants and not an institution for the infirm. Visits from the nurse, :.social worker, or social advisor/counselor can be accomplished in the persons home without the need to visit a central area. Sound and surrounding activity are important. With these thoughts in mind the staff rates the proposals as follows. First - Old Capitol Associates Second - Knutson Construction Third - Midstates Development D. Viability of Program, the proposals chance of approval by HUD and eventual construction. The Midstates proposal is an excellent proposal in many respects. However, unless major waivers are granted by the local housing Authority it is felt that HUD would state the proposal was not rest-)onsive to the invitation, i.e., Type V construction versus Type I and its failure to be in close proximity to normal shopping and social recreational activities. Further there are some financial concerns that can only be resolved by HUD. It appears that the small amount of capitol to be invested by the developer may not support the loan he is requesting. Knutson's proposal does contain more than the required space. However, caution is expressed here that the housing Authority is attempting to provide too much space. This has two prongs - first the housing dollar is to be for housing and IIUD could conceivably reject the proposal for this reason. The second prong is a feeling that through subsidy these units will be providing more than a medium income person could obtain without subsidy. The amount of investment by the developer is small compared to the size of loan. If interum financing is obtained with a permanent plan to be arranged later the financial structure may change. And finally the cost of construction appears to be low to the point of concern. The letter received from Knutson after the verbal presentation indicates that if selected this entire area of total expense will be reviewed and the necessary adjustments made. The site will require rezoning which could cause problems. If rezoning fails then the proposal fails and time may prohibit selecting another developer. The Old Capitol proposal while providing only the minimum unit space does have a more realistic approach to the financing of the project. The project appears to offer all that is required of public assisted housing. The staff recommends the proposals be rated as follows. I m > M T� i o E5 O tk . D �1 v Z -2 - building is to be considered as home for these occupants and not an institution for the infirm. Visits from the nurse, social worker, or social advisor/counselor can be accomplished in the persons home without the need to visit- a central area. sound and surrounding activity are important. with these thoughts in mind the staff rates the proposals as follows. First - Old Capitol Associates Second Knutson Construction Third - Midstates Development D. Viability of Program, the proposals chance of approval by HUD and eventual construction. The Midstates proposal is an excellent proposal in many respects. However, unless major waivers are granted by ,the local Housing Authority it is felt that HUD would state the proposal was not responsive to the invitation, i.e., Type V construction versus Type I and its failure to be in close proximity to normal shopping and social recreational activities. Further there are some financial concerns that can only be resolved by HUD. It appears that the small amount of capitol to be invested by the developer may not support the loan he is requesting. Knutson's proposal does contain more than the required space. However, caution is expressed here that the Housing Authority is attempting to provide too much space. This has two prongs - first the housing dollar is to be for housing and HUD could conceivably reject the proposal for this reason. The second prong is a feeling that through subsidy these units will be providing more than a medium income person could obtain without subsidy. The amount of investment by the developer is small compared to the size of loan. If interum financing is obtained with a permanent plan to be arranged later the financial structure may change. And finally the cost of construction appears to be low to the point of concern. The letter received from Knutson after the verbal presentation indicates that if selected this entire area of total expense will be reviewed and the necessary adjustments made. The site will require rezoning which could cause problems. If rezoning fails then the proposal fails and time may prohibit selecting another developer. The Old Capitol proposal while providing only the minimum unit space does have a more realistic approach to the financing of the project. The project appears to offer all that is required of public assisted housing. The staff recommends the proposals be rated as follows. First - Old Capitol Associates Second - Knutson Construction Third- Midstates Development The overall recommendation from the staff is that Old Capitol Associates be tentatively selected at this time. SECTION A EVALUATION OF SELECTION FACTORS 1. SITE. a. Recommend YES. b. Recommend YES. C. Recommend Inferior. This recommendation is made with much reluctance however a reasonable and rational analysis supports the recommendation. (1) It is inferior to another -site proposed. (2) The proposal to place this building on this site is contrary to an existing planned use of the site, i.e., this site is a portion of a plan for the development of a civic, governmental complex composed of three blocks. (3) The site is currently not zoned properly and a zoning change would be required. The proposal does acknowledge this requirement. It is believed that the rezoning would be controversial to say the least. Should it fail to be rezoned the city is running the risk of losing the federal support for 62 units of elderly housing. The approval of this allocation from HUD specifies that the authority must enter.into an agreement to enter into a housing assistance payment contract with the developer within five months, that is February -.25, 1975. If zoning fails the authority -may not have time to select another developer. (4) The slope of the ground mass between the site and the available shopping is such to discourage walking and may prohibit navigability with a wheelchair or walker. (5) The traffic on Gilbert and Washington would cause noise problems. The building would only have the normal set back from these streets with little or no possibility of screening. (6) The location just across police stations would subject caused by the sirens of fire, vehicles. the street from fire and tenants to numerous disturbances police, and emergency rescue -2- 2. DESIGN AND QUALITY OF CONSTRUCTION. a. Recommend NO. (1) Paragraph 3f states all community/recreational area and administrative space shall be air conditioned and carpeted except for kitchen, toilet and maintenance area. The proposal provides carpeting for apartments, hallways and clinical suite only. (2) Paragraph q of the invitation for proposals requires submission of certain documents if the project is to be financed with HUD/FHA Insured Mortgage. The proposal response indicated this item is not applicable at this time yet the FHA form 2013 application - Project Mortgage Insurance was completed and submitted. Entries on this form will be dealt with later in this addendum. (3) Paragraph 3x requires air conditioning in all units to be assisted. Air conditioning in the units is not provided. Through the wall sleeves for future installation of 1 or 1-� ton individual units is proposed. No indication at whose.expense. If this item was provided as in the invitation it would affect cost and also operating costs. This is considered a major deviation from the invitation for proposals and acceptance of any changes at this time would be considered a change in the overall proposal. (4) Paragraph 6 1 requires "The gross rents required by unit size with the portion of such rents attributable to each utility." The portion attributable to each utility was provided late. The Form 2013 does list an operating cost figure which appears extremely low considering the structure. If the electricity was added to this cost for the air conditioning it would certainly increase operating costs and in turn have some effect on rent requirements. (5) Paragraph 6b of _the invitation requires submission of documents which show site control. The proposal shows the First Christian Church has an option to purchase the land and -has assigned the right to submit a proposal to Knutson Construction. If this proposal is selected additional documentation may be required prior to submission to HUD. (6) Paragraph 6c - requires a neighborhood mar showing location of the site and the racial composition of the neighborhood. This proposal does not give the racial composition of the neighborhood. While this is not big problem in Iowa City another developer has met this criteria. This could be inserted if this proposal was tentatively selected without materially changing the proposal. (7) Water pressure on the top floors could be a problem. The proposal does not address how this will be handled. This could materially effect cost of the structure. b. Recommend adequate. Density of development appears quite high. It equates to 72 units per acre. However, this density is not unreasonable considering the projected occupancy, parking spaces required and its proximity'to the central business district. Land use intensity appears to be acceptable. C. Recommend adequate. (1) The space provided in the units is without a doubt more than the other proposal received. The cost of construction is questionable, but at this point in time commendable. This specific item could mean rejection by HUD and the local populace as providing more space than is required in public housing. A backlash effect may arise from those persons in the income group not eligible to participate in -the program but cannot afford a comparable offering on the open market. (2) The opening between apartments at a first glance may appear excellent. However, it does effectively degrade privacy, fire attenuation and sound transmission. d. Recommend adequate. e. Recommend adequate. 3. PER UNIT GROSS RENTS. a. Below the maximum gross rents published in the Invitation for Proposals. While the asking rents are below the maximum contained in the invitation serious questions are raised concerning several items on the HUD Form 2013. These would __ effect rent. A few specifics are: Administrative cost - $8,400 - it is doubtful a manager could be hired for the project at this fee. What about the other employees and administrative costs? Operating costs - $19,090 - utility costs will without a doubt exceed this amount. what about other costs? Taxes - $20,800 - extremely low. In fact a building of this nature should produce taxes nearly double this figure. b. Recommend YES. Reservations are outlined in the previous item. C. Recommend YES. However, when the air conditioning is added it is only reasonable to assume the utility cost will go up. 4. CREDENTIALS OF THE DEVELOPER, BUILDER AND/OR OWNER a. Recommend YES. See previous experience statement. This firm is the general contractor for Cedar River Towers, a 25 story, 156 unit apartment building. Information from one of the owners indicates the construction has gone well to this point. It is closed in and ready for interior finishing. b. Recommend YES. See previous experience statement. C. Recommend YES. See above. d. Recommend YES. See above. e. Recommend acceptable. f. Recommend YES. There is no identity of interest between Knutson and the LHA. SECTION B - MANAGEMENT CAPABILITY 1. Recommend YES. 2. Recommend YES. 3. Recommend YES. The Knutson Construction Firm is a reliable and established firm. It is in business and has been successful, therefore the experience and qualifications can be assumed to be present. 4. Recommend YES. Material submitted indicates that Knutson would select a qualified agent with necessary capabilities to carry out the management of this project. 5. Not applicable. 6. Recommend YES. No agent identified but it can be assumed there would be no identity of interest with the LHA. - SECTION C - COMPLIANCE WITH EQUAL OPPORTUNITY REQUIREMENTS 1. Recommend YES. 2. Recommend YES. 3. Recommend adequate. SECTION D - EMPLOYMENT AND UTILIZATION.OF LOWER INCOME RESIDENTS AND BUSINESSES PERSONSARESIDINGROWNED IN IN THE PROJECTT AL PART BY AREA 1. Recommend NO. Knutson not in Iowa City. 2. Recommend NO. There are no indications from*Knutson that local subcontractors or suppliers would be utilized. However, the firm has been active iri this city - Post office Building and University hospital as general contractor. 3. Recommend NO. Proposal does provide a positive affirmative action program for Minneapolis projects, however, does not relate or project anticipated goals for this project. It can be assumed that this could be negotiated if this proposal was tentatively selected. 4. Recommend adequate. SECTION E - OTHER 1. Recommend YES. 2. Not applicable. 3. Other factors having a bearing. (1) The site is bounded on two sides by heavily traveled streets. As urban renewalproceeds the traffic on both of these streets can be expected to increase. (2) The site is not considered as good as that contained in another proposal. (3) The application for Project_ Mortgage reveals some serious shortcomings from a financial stability standpoint. Building cost $958,339 plus land cost of $113,400=$1,071,739. This probably will not justify a loan of $1,336,300. The cash equity from the sponsor versus the amount to be mortgaged is not realistic and tends to present a very questionable financial structure for this project. It appears that Knutson is acquiring interim financing outside HUD/FHA until permanent financing can be arranged. If this is to be a HUD/FHA plan there is a risk that the rental rates as determined by the HUD/FHA mortgage insurance program will not be as high as the fair market rent established for this area, and the financial structure would change after construction has begun. This change could only be increased unlessthereare sacrifices in quality of construction. We need not take this risk. (4) Final and/or eventual ownership is not clearly stated. This may effect the financial picture. If it is to be a nonprofit organization exempt from all or some taxation the picture is then different. If this is the case then the rents are not in line with the fair market rents established for this area. i :W CHECKL ONSTRUCT BION 23: I LS INSTRUCTIONS: Check oil applicable boxes and provide all information requested, even if the proposal is found unacceptable on the basis of any single item or factor. NAME OF LOCAL HOUSING AUTHORITY PROJECT NUMBER Tnwa Ci tv I IA 22-2 LOCATION OF PROPOSED PROJECT Chauncey Swan Plaza I. SITE (S). 2r 1974 TOTAL NO. OF UNITS IN PROJECT 64 TOTAL NUMBER TO BE ASSISTED 62 SECTION A - EVALUATION OF SELECTION FACTORS a. The site of the proposed project is in conformance with the special requirements (if any) contained in the LHA's Invitation for Proposals and/or Developer's Packet. YES .� NO — PROPOSAL UNACCEPTABLE (F.spluin) b. The site of the proposed project is in conformance with the requirements contained in paragraph 2-9 of the Section 23 New Construction Handbook. I_ YES NO — PROPOSAL UNACCEPTABLE (Explain) c. Site desirability is: L� SUPERIOR Q ADEQUATE C] INFERIOR 2. DESIGN AND QUALITY OF CONSTRUCTION. (if the proposal, including the Preliminary Drawings and Specifications, is not sufficient to verify compliance with design and construction quality requirements. additional information which does not alter the scope of the proposal may be requested.) a. The design and quality of construction are in accordance with LHA and HUD requirements specified in the Invitation for Proposals, the Developer's Packet, and the Section 23 New Construction Handbook. Q YES Q NO — PROPOSAL UNACCEPTABLE (Explain) b. In relation to the other proposals received, the land use planning and treatment of the proposed site is: �J SUPERIOR �.�] ADEQUATE [_� INFERIOR c. In relation to the other proposals received, the building layout and unit plans are: Q SUPERIOR - Q ADEQUATE u INFERIOR d. In relation to the other proposals received, the architectural treatment of structures is: Q SUPERIOR - [D ADEQUATE E] INFERIOR ■ 3. PER UNIT GROSS RENTS. a. The per unit gross rents are: EQUA and materials is: ' Q: INFERIOR Q Below the maximum gross rents published in the Invitation for Proposals MEquaI to such maximum gross rents QAbove such maximum gross rents — proposal unacceptable b. The proposed rents to owner are reasonable in relation to the quality, location, amenities and manage- ment and maintenance services of the proposed project. Q YES _ Q No (Explain) c. The estimated utility allowances for tenant -purchased utilities are reasonable. Q YES Q NO (Explain) 4. CREDENTIALS OF THE DEVELOPER, BUILDER AND/OR OWNER. a. The developer, builder, and/or owner have acceptable experience in the development and/or construction of housing, or in related fields. Q YES (Explain) ED No (Explain) b. The developer, builder, and/or owner have experience in developing housing for lower) income persons. YES (Explain) NO c. The developer, builder, and/or owner have experience in the type of construction proposed. YES (Explain) O NO d. The developer, builder, and/or owner have experience in the development and/or construction of projects at' a scale comparable to that of the proposed project. 0 YES (Explain) No (Explain) e. The ability of the developer, builder, and/or owner as demonstrated by past performance is: Q VERY 0000 a ACCEPTABLE f. There is no identity of interest between the owner and the LHA. Q YES Q NO - PROPOSAL UNACCEPTABLE (Explain) MUD -52500A (3-74) —2— r.: Q NOT ACCEPTABLE 1. The proposal conforms to the Invitation for Proposals, the Developer's Packet, and the Section 23 New Construction Handbook in regard to owner responsibilities for management, maintenance, taxes, insurance, and utilities. Q YES Q NO — PROPOSAL UNACCEPTABLE (Explain) 2. The management submission contained in the proposal meets all requirements of Appendix V of the Section 23 New Construction Handbook. Q YES Q No (Explain) 3. The owner has the necessary experience and/or qualifications to carry out project management and maintenance activities. Q YES (Explain) Q No (Explain) 4. If the owner proposes to contract with a management agent to carry out management and maintenance responsi- bilities, such agent has the necessary experience and/or qualifications to carry out such responsibilities. Q YES (Explain) Q No (Explain) S. If the owner proposes to contract with the LHA for management, maintenance, or operation of the project, complete the following. a: The owner has satisfactorily demonstrated that no other competent management agent is available. Q YES Q No (Explain) b. The proposed contract -to be entered into with the LHA is acceptable. Q YES Q No (Explain) 6. There is no identity of interest between the LHA and the management agent. C] YES Q NO — MANAGEMENT SUBMISSION IS UNACCEPTABLE SECTION C — COMPLIANCE WITH EQUAL OPPORTUNITY REQUIREMENTS 1. The owner has submitted an Affirmative Farr Housing Marketing Plan. YES Q NO — PROPOSAL UNACCEPTABLE (Explain) 2. The required Title VI Assurance and any required Executive Order 11246 certifications have been submitted. Q YES Q No (Explain) 3. The potential of the proposal for achieving equal opportunity objectives, relative to all other proposals submitted, is: Q SUPERIOR Q ADEQUATE Q INFERIOR HUD -52500A (3-74) e —3— 1. The developer's, builder's and/or owner's firm is located in,.or owned in substantial part by persons residing in, the project area. YES Q NO 2. An affirmative action plan for utilization of businesses located in or owned in substantial part by persons residing in the project area has been submitted. Q YES Q NO — PROPOSAL UNACCEPTABLE (Explain) 3. The proposal includes information with regard to the number of trainee and employee positions to be filled by lower income project area residents as required by regulations issued pursuant to Section 3 of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968. Q YES No (Explain) 4: In relation to other development proposals received, the developer's, builder's, and/or owner's plan has the following potential for effectuating the purposes of Section 3 of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968: Q SUPERIOR Q ADEQUATE = INFERIOR SECTION E — OTHER 1. The proposal meets all other requirements of the Invitation for Proposals, Developer's Packet, and the Sec- tion 23 New Construction Handbook. Q YES - - Q NO — PROPOSAL UNACCEPTABLE (Explain) 2. (Complete if proposed project will involve displacement of site occupants.) a. The estimate of relocation costs submitted with the proposal is accepted. O YES No (Explain) b. If the answer to a above is "No," the amount of relocation costs as calculated by the LHA is S c. The proposal indicate that the developer, builder, and/or owner is/are fully cognizant of HUD relocation requirements under the, Uniform Relocation Assistance and* Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 and will meet those requirements. O YES Q NO — PROPOSAL UNACCEPTABLE (Explain) d. Full funding of all relocation costs involved will be provided: (1) By the developer, builder, and/or owner. Q YES - r-1 NO (2) By other commitments satisfactory to HUD: (� YES (Specify) 0 No (Specify) HUD-52SOOA (3-74) —4— (Date) HUD -52500A (3-74) —5— (Signature of LHA Official) (Title) an - n u r Sal.` on- evalwtion of the (Date) HUD -52500A (3-74) —5— (Signature of LHA Official) (Title) an HOUSING COMMISSION ADDENDUM HUD 52500A LHA REVIEW CHECKLIST KNUTSON CONSTRUCTION SECTION A - EVALUATION OF SELECTION FACTORS 1. SITE. a. Recommend YES. 4-0. b. Recommend YES. 4-0. The site in this proposal is not totally free from adverse environmental conditions such as excessive noise (fire and police station across street) or vehicular traffic. Simulated traffic counts with Dubuque and Madison street closings for Gilbert Street between Burlington Street and Iowa Avenue range from 17,300 in the Recreation Center block, 16,200 in the block of the proposed building and 14,000 in the block just north of -the site. C. Recommend adequate. 4•-0. 2. DESIGN AND QUALITY OF CONSTRUCTION. a. Recommend YES. 4-0. This proposal does not provide air conditioning in the dwelling units. However, by letter the developer has indicated this could be provided and a review of the rental structure would be necessary. b. Recommend adequate. 4-0. C. Recommend superior. 4-0. The space provided both within the dwelling units and outside the units but within the building is so arranged as to facilitate and encourage interaction between tenants and comfortable and convenient access and mobility. d. Recommend adequate 3. Recommend superior 1. e. Recommend adequate. 5-0. 3. PER UNIT GROSS RENTS. a. Recommend Below the maximum gross rents published in the Invitation for Proposals. 5-0. While this proposal does indicate a lower rent, air conditioning was not included within the units. The developer has indicated this could be added and the rental structure reviewed. b. Recommend YES. 5-0: In evaluating this item for this proposal the planning for amenities and space provided is more than the other proposals. This could- be viewed as a balance for the lack of air conditioning. C. No tenant provided utilities. 4. CREDENTIALS OF THE DEVELOPER, BUILDER AND/OR OWNER. a. Recommend YES. 5-0. The previous participation certificate indicates this firm has acceptable experience in the development and construction of buildings of this magnitude. b. Recommend YES. 5-0. See above comments. C. Recommend YES. 5-0. See above. d. Recommend YES. 5-0. See above. e. Recommend acceptable. 5-0. f. Recommend YES. 5-0. SECTION B - MANAGEMENT CAPABILITY 1. Recommend YES. 6-0. 2. Recommend YES. 6-0. There is a factual error in the plan. Tenants are certified and re -certified as eligible to participate by the Housing Authority not the owner. 3. Recommend YES. 6-0. The information submitted with the proposal contained in exhibit Q, Behavorial. Program and Planning Quide indicate this firm has reviewed and considered the elderly and handicapped not only in designing the building but in the management of the project. 4. No agent identified. 5. Not applicable. 6. Recommend YES. 6-0. SECTION C - COMPLIANCE WITH EQUAL OPPORTUNITY REQUIREMENTS 1. Recommend YES. 6-0. 2. Recommend YES. 6-0. 3. Recommend adequate. 6-0. L SECTION D - EMPLOYMENT AND UTILIZATION OF LOWER INCOME RESIDENTS AND BUSINESSES LOCATED IN OR OWNED IN SUBSTANTIAL PART BY PERSONS RESIDING IN THE PROJECT AREA 1. Recommend NO. 6-0. 2. Recommend YES. 6-0. 3. Recommend NO. 6-0. This proposal does provide a breakout of employees in the home office area, but not for this project. It appears that it is much too early in the processing schedule to ask for this type detail. 4. Recommend adequate. 6-0. SECTION E - OTHER 1. Recommend YES. a. Does not meet parking requirement .for the zone to date, but developer has indicated that an adjustment will be sought. 2. Not applicable. 3. Other factors having a bearing upon the evaluation. a. This proposal listed an "in sink garbage disposal unit." It is unclear if this is provided in each unit or just in the community kitchen. b. This proposal included two laundry areas. C. Has provided several lounge areas with window views. d. Proposal contains showers in each unit with a tub room available on every other floor. The specifications on the showers list 48" x 32 Floor plan indicates showers are 5' square. Showers for handicapped must be minimum of 48" x 48". e. Garbage shutes available on each floor to a central compactor. f. No specific references were provided pertaining to special attention for sound attenuation other than the carpeting on the floor and acoustical tile. g. This proposal indicates a window height from the floor of 28 inches. h. Did not include air conditioning but has indicated their willingness to do so with a rent review to follow. If individual units are installed through the wall in each room they will protrude either on the inside or the outside. i. Interior decorating scheme was not detailed. It is hoped there will be some latitude for individual choice within the apartment. j. This proposal provides 36" doors in all apartments and an additional 2' space beside the door to facilitate opening and closing. k. A designated and planned arts and crafts center is provided. HUt`-52500A (3-7a) s INSTRUCTIONS: Check all applicable boxes and provide all information requested, even if the proposal is found unacceptable on the basis of any single item or factor. NAME OF LOCAL HOUSING AUTHORITY PROJECT NUMBER Iowa City IA 22-2 FIRM NAME Midstates Develo LOCATION OF PROPOSED PROJECT West Benton Street 1. SITE(S)• t, Inc. December 2, 1974 TOTAL NO. OF UNITS IN PROJECT 62 UI AL NUMBER TO BE ASSISTED 62 SECTION A - EVALUATION OF SELECTION FACTORS a. The site of the proposed project is in conformance with the special requirements (if any) contained in the LHA's Invitation for Proposals and/or Developer's Packet. YES NO — PROPOSAL UNACCEPTABLE (Explain) b. The site of the proposed project is in conformance with the requirements contained in paragraph 2--9 of the Section 23 New Construction Handbook. YES . NO — PROPOSAL UNACCEPTABLE (Explain) C. Site desirability is: [-I SUPERIOR ADEQUATE I INFERIOR 2. DESIGN AND QUALITY OF CONSTRUCTION. (/f the proposal, including the Preliminary Drawings and .Specifications, is not sufficient to verify compliance with design and construction quality requirements, additional information which does not alter the scope of the proposal may be requested.) a. The design and quality of construction are in accordance with LHA and HUD requirements specified in the Invitation for Proposals, the Developer's Packet, and the Section 23 New Construction Handbook. Q YES Q NO — PROPOSAL UNACCEPTABLE (Explain) b. In relation to the other proposals received, the land use planning and treatment of the proposed site is: O SUPERIOR 0 ADEQUATE L-1 INFERIOR c. In relation to the other proposals received, the building layout and unit plans are: Q SUPERIOR - Q ADEQUATE LJ INFERIOR d. In relation to the other proposals received, the architectural treatment of structures is: EJ SUPERIOR O ADEQUATE F-1 INFERIOR Q Below the maximum gross rents published in the Invitation for Proposals QEqual to such maximum gross rents QAbove such maximum gross rents — proposal unacceptable b. The proposed rents to owner are reasonable in relation to the quality, location, amenities and manage- ment and maintenance services of the proposed project. Q YES Q NO (Explain) c. The estimated utility allowances for tenant -purchased utilities are reasonable. Q YES 0 No (Explain) 9. CREDENTIALS OF THE DEVELOPER, BUILDER AND/Olt OWNER. a. The developer, builder, and/or owner have acceptable experience in the development and/or construction of housing, or in related fields. Q YES (Explain) Q NO (Explain) b. The developer, builder, and/or owner have experience in developing housing for low(er) income persons. Q YES (Explain) Q NO c. The developer, builder, and/or owner have experience in the type of construction proposed. Q YES (Explain) Q NO d. The developer, builder, and/or owner have experience in the development and/or construction of projects at'a scale comparable to that of the proposed project. Q YES (Explain) Q NO (Explain) e. The ability of the developer, builder, and/or owner.as demonstrated by past performance is: Q VERY 0000 Q ACCEPTABLE f. There is no identity of interest between the owner and the LHA. Q YES Q NO — PROPOSAL UNACCEPTABLE (Explain) HUD -52500A (3-74) —2— Q NOT ACCEPTABLE (If the owner's management below, the LHA may require the owner ?o submit additional information.) - _ - �..r. I IoR', 1. The proposal conforms to the Invitation for Proposals, the Developer's Packet, and the Section 23 New Construction Handbook in regard to owner responsibilities for management, maintenance, taxes, insurance, and utilities. Q YES Q NO — PROPOSAL UNACCEPTABLE (Explain) 2. The management submission contained in the proposal meets all requirements of Appendix V of the Section 23 New Construction Handbook. Q YES Q No (Explain) 3. The owner has the necessary experience and/or qualifications to carry out project management and maintenance activities. Q YES (Explain) Q NO (Explain) 4. If the owner proposes to contract with a management agent to carry out management and maintenance responsi- bilities, such agent has the necessary experience and/or qualifications to carry out such responsibilities. Q YES (Explain) Q NO (Explain) S. If the owner proposes to contract with the LHA for management, maintenance, or operation of the project, complete the following. a: The owner has satisfactorily demonstrated that no.other competent management agent is available. Q YES Q NO (Explain) b. The proposed contract to be entered into with the LHA is acceptable. Q YES Q No (Explain) 6. There is no identity of interest between the LHA and the management agent. Q YES -. Q NO — MANAGEMENT SUBMISSION IS UNACCEPTABLE SECTION C — COMPLIANCE WITH EQUAL OPPORTUNITY REQUIREMENTS I. The owner has submitted an Affirmative Fair Housing Marketing Plan. YES Q NO — PROPOSAL UNACCEPTABLE (Explain) 2. The required Title VI Assurance and any required Executive Order 11246 certifications have been submitted. Q YES Q No (Explain) 3. The potential of the proposal for achieving equal opportunity objectives, relative to all other proposals submitted, is: Q SUPERIOR HUD -52500A (3-74) Q ADEQUATE —3— Q INFERIOR i r':, SECTION D LOYMENT W. TILIZATION, ,OF ,INCOME RESIDENTS AND BUSINESSES LOCATED IN. OR OWNED`IN SUBSTANTIAL PART BY :•: PERSONS RESIDING:INTHE'PROJECT AREA., _. 1. The developer's, builder's and/or owner's firm is located in, or owned in substantial part by persons residing in, the project area. Q YES Q NO 2. An affirmative action plan for utilization of businesses located in or owned in substantial part by persons residing in the project area has been submitted. Q YES Q NO — PROPOSAL UNACCEPTABLE (Explain) 3. The proposal includes information with regard to the number of trainee and employee positions to be filled by lower income project area residents as required by regulations issued pursuant to Section 3 of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968. - Q YES Q No (Explain) 4: In relation to other development proposals received, the developer's, builder's, and/or owner's plan has the following potential for effectuating the purposes of Section 3 of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968: Q SUPERIOR Q ADEQUATE Q INFERIOR SECTION E — OTHER 1. The proposal meets all other requirements of the Invitation for Proposals, Developer's Packet, and the Sec- tion 23 New Construction Handbook. Q YES Q NO — PROPOSAL UNACCEPTABLE (Explain) 2. (Complete if proposed project will involve displacement of site occupants.) a. The estimate of relocation costs submitted with the proposal is accepted. Q YES Q No (Explain) b. If the answer to a above is "No," the amount of relocation costs as calculated by the LHA is S c. The proposal indicate_ that the developer, builder, and/or owner is/are fully cognizant of HUD relocation requirements under the Uniform Relocation Assistance and'Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 and will meet those requirements. Q YES Q NO — PROPOSAL UNACCEPTABLE (Explain) d. Full funding of all relocation costs involved will be provided: (1) By the developer, builder, and/or owner.' Q YES Q NO (2) By other commitments satisfactory to HUD: Q YES (Specify) Q No (Specify) HUD -52500A (3-71) —4— (Date) (Signature of LHA Official) (Title) HUD -52500A (3-74) — 5 — HOUSING ADDENDUM IiUD 525OOA LIIA REVIEW CIIECKLIST MIDSTATES DEVELOPMENT 1. SITE. SECTION A - EVALUATION OF SELECTION FACTORS a. Recommend NO. 4-0. This site does not meet the requirements specified in the invitation for proposals. Paragraph 3i states "Other locations may be considered provided they are within easy walking distance (3 blocks) of social, recreational, commercial, municipal facilities and services, health facilities, etc." b. Recommend YES. 4-0. This site is in alignment with airport traffic which may cause some minor noise factors. It is highly dependent on private auto or mass transit which does stop immediately in front of the site. C. Recommend inferior 3. Adequate 1. All three sites could be considered adequate, however, each has its drawbacks as indicated in the above items. The issue of site location is really a value judgement as no systematic user -need study has been conducted to determine the preferences of the potential residents. In relationship to the other sites and the requirements spelled out in'the invitation this site is inferior. 2. DESIGN AND QUALITY OF CONSTRUCTION. a. Recommend NO. 4-0. The design of th proposal is appealing in that the two sto more acceptable than a highrise building. provided will meet the required building area and the fire saftey requirements for it does not meet the type I construction b. Recommend adequate. 4-0. e building in this ry structure may be The type V construction code requirements for this this fire zone. However, specified in the invitation. C. Recommend adequate. 4-0. The minimum 10% of the living units to be designated for the handicapped is not shown. These units must have a 4' x 4' shower or a tub that is accessible on one side for the entire length of the tub. The. kitchens do not provide turn around space for those in wheelchairs. d. Recommend adequate. 4-0. e. Recommend inferior 4. Adequate 1. For this rating only materials were'considered.- The quality•of'construction could not be evaluated. 3. 4. 1. PER UNIT GROSS RENTS. a. Recommend Equal to such maximum gross rents. 5-0. b. Recommend NO. 5-0. Land costs are leas, less expensive material costs, and a two story building should be less costly to construct. The quality of the building and amenities provided and the location would not appear to support this high a rental scale. C. No tenant purchased utilities. CREDENTIALS OF THE DEVELOPER, BUILDER AND/OR OWNER. a. Recommend YES. 5-0. This developer has acceptable experience in the development and construction of housing. The projects listed on the required HUD form which spells out previous participation would indicate this developer has and would continue to perform in a satisfactory manner. b. Recommend YES. 5-0. C. Recommend YES. 5-0. d. Recommend YES. 5-0. e. Recommend acceptable. f. Recommend YES. 5-0. See above comments. See above. See above. 5-0. SECTION B - MANAGEMENT CAPABILITY Recommend YES. 6-0. 2. Recommend NO. 6-0. While the proposal does contain a management plan it does not contain the detail required by Appendix v of the HUD Handbook. The developer, in his verbal presentation to the Commission did indicate to our satisfaction that these requirements would be met. 3. Recommend YES. 6-0. This firm has been in the residential construction business as shown in the proposal. Sufficient evidence is available to indicate the experience and qualifications are present to carry out the management and maintenance functions. 4. No agents identified. 5. Not applicable. 6. Recommend YES. 6-0. 2. Recommend YES. 6-0. 3. Recommend adequate. 6-0. SECTION D - EMPLOYMENT AND UTILIZATION OF LOVER INCOME RESIDENTS AND BUSINESSES LOCATED IN OR OWNED IN SUBSTANTIAL PART BY PERSONS RESIDING IN THE PROJECT AREA 1. Recommend NO. 6-0. 2. Recommend YES. 6-0. 3. Recommend YES. 6-0. While this proposal does not specify the detail concerning number of trainees and employees it is believed the firm could fulfill all requirements of this section. At this stage of processing it appears to be an unrealistic evaluation. 4. Recommend adequate. 6-0. SECTION E - OTHER 1. Recommend NO. a. The entire length of the bathtubisnot accessible to the bather. b. Kitchen does not provide a 5' turning radius on required 10% of units. C. Does not meet parking requirement for the zone to date, but developer has indicated that an adjustment will be sought. d. Proposal does not indicate that a 24 hour emergency call service would be provided. The developer did indicate in his presentation that it would be provided. e. Did not include T.V. antenna as required, however, in the verbal presentation the developer indicated this would be included. 2. Not applicable. 3. Other factors having a bearing upon the evaluation. a. h horsepower garbage disposal units are listed in the outline specifications. It is unclear if these are in community kitchen only or are also included in the individual unit kitchens. b. This proposal included two laundry areas. C. The general floor plan indicates the lobby area has no windows. d. Provides for 62 tubs with hand showers. e. Compactors not provided, however, in presentation the developer indicated there would be facilities for a pick-up arrangement on each floor. f. No specific attention has been given to sound attenuation other than the carpeting on the floor and acoustical tile. g. Window heights from floor was not specified. h. Includes air conditioning. i. No details were provided concerning the interior decorating scheme. It is hoped that there may be latitude for individual choices within the apartments. j. Door widths to bathrooms appear to be 30" and 32" as required. k. A designated space has not been indicated for arts and crafts although it could be included in the community room. ADDENDUM TO HUD -52500A 1,11A REVIEW CHECKLIST MIDSTATES DEVELOPMENT, INC. 1. SITE. a. Recommend NO. Paragraph 3i of the invitation states "....other locations may be considered y provided they are within easy walking distance (3 blocks) of social, recreational commercial, municipal facilities and services, health facilities, etc. as provided in the preferred area...". This site does not provide this ready access. While a public transportation capability is available to the site, the nearest shopping is in excess of six blocks. The steep incline on West Benton Street would probably discourage occupants from walking in that direction which would be necessary to reach shopping, therefore the occupants would be dependant on public or private means of transportation. b. Recommend YES. C. Inferior. The site is remote from the type service and shopping requirements normally utilized by the occupants that will be served by this program. 2. DESIGN AND QUALITY OF CONSTRUCTION. a. Recommend NO. Paragraph 3b of the invitation specifies Type I construction. Uniform Building Code (UBC) defines "The structural elements in type I buildings shall be of steel, iron, concrete or masonry." This proposal is type V construction, UBC definition -"Type V building may be of any materials allowed by this code. Type V, one-hour buildings shall be of one-hour fire resistive construction throughout". This proposal is not responsive to the invitation even though the developer has indicated it will meet all the requirements of the fire zone in which it is located. Because it is type V construction it does not have the durability of type I. b. Recommend adequate. The site layout is well planned. C. Recommend adequate., -The building layout and unit plans are adequate in comparison to the other proposals received. 3 d. Recommend adequate. e. Recommend inferior. in the other proposals. PER UNIT GROSS RENTS. Type V in comparison to Type I a. Equal to such maximum gross rents. Fair market rents for an elevator type building established by HUD is $266 for a one bedroom unit and $338 for a two bedroom unit. b. Recommend NO. These rents are not comparable to other proposals received. Land cost is less, construction cost should be considerably less therefore rents should be less. In comparing to similar type construction in this city built within the last year the rents requested in this proposal are considered to be extremely high. Several buildings similar in construction rent for $170-185 plus electricity for a one bedroom and $225 for two bedroom. Another building more sturdy in construction than this proposal , one bedroom with 830 sq. ft. rents for $230 plus electricity, two bedroom, one bath, 1116 sq. ft. $300 plus electricity. These apartments would be considered plush compared to this proposal. c. No tenant purchased utilities. Recommend YES. 4. CREDENTIALS OF THE DEVELOPER, BUILDER AND/OR OWNER. a. Recommend YES. The Midstated Development, Inc. has experience in the development and construction of housing. See previous participation certificate. b. Recommend YES. The development at Charles City is for low income elderly. It is a well planned and constructed complex. C. Recommend YES. Same as above. d. Recommend YES. Same as above. e. Recommend acceptable. f. Recommend YES. -3 - SECTION B -MANAGEMENT CAPABILITY 1. Recommend YES. Statement included in proposal. 2. Recommend NO. Proposal does not include items contained in paragraph 2b, C appendix V, i.e., contact person responsible for management and the list of projects previously owned and/or managed. While the description of the management philosophy is present and indicates what the management plan will be the presentation does not handle.specifics as required by appendix V. Example - eviction procedures;.what maintenance and services will be provided. The 24 hour emergency call service which is required by the invitation is not included. In view of the above there is no reason to believe that this item could not be negotiated to successful completion if this proposal was tentatively selected. 3. Recommend YES. The established reputation of the firm by past experience would indicate they do have the experience and qualifications to carry out project management and maintenance. 4. Recommend YES. Developer/owner has local manager would be hired and would established by the firm. 5. Not applicable. 6. Not applicable. indicated an on site perform under quidelines SECTION C -COMPLIANCE WITH EQUAL OPPORTUNITY REQUIREMENTS• 1. Recommend YES. HUD form 935.2 included in proposal. Also touched upon in the management submission. 2. Recommend YES. HUD form 41901 included. 3. Recommend adequate. 1. No. 2. Recommend YES. Stated intent to utilize local labor, materials and subcontractors to the fullest potential. 3. Recommend NO. Statement is made that site employment will conform with local, state and federal guidelines. The proposal does indicate that the sponsors affirmative action program is on file in the Omaha Area Office. Based on the fact that this firm has developed and constructed public housing it is reasonable to assume these plans are adequate. This could be obtained if this proposal was selected. 4. Recommend adequate. SECTION E - OTHER 1. Recommend NO. a. Type V when I was designated. b. Parking spaces not adequate for zone. Both owner and developer have indicated additional spaces could be added. This would have an effect on total cost and would probably alter the cost. C. Management plan marginal. d. No landscape plans submitted, required by paragraph 6 of invitation. e. No neighborhood map showing minority concentration. Required by paragraph 6C. This could be negotiated or added if this proposal was selected. 2. Not applicable. 3. Other factors (1) Accessible by only one street. (2) Availability of othersites more suitably located dictates that this proposal not be tentatively selected. (3) The proposal is not responsive in two major areas, i.e., type of construction and location. (4) The request for a loan in principal amount of $1,150,000 vs. total investment to be made does not appear realistic. Example, $860,000 estimated building cost & $87,500 land cost = $947,500 this would not support a loan as requested. Example, estimated assessed value for taxes is $800,000 it is believed this would not support a loan of this magnitude. (5) This site would be subject to airport noises. while this may be minimal the site is in the normal ta'.ce-off and landing pattern for our small municipal airport. INSTRUCTIONS: Check all applicable boxes and provide all information requested, even if the proposal is found unacceptable on the basis of any single item or factor. NAME OF LOCAL HOUSING AUTHORITY PROJECt NUMBER Iowa City Housing Authority IA 22-2 Old Capitol Associates LOCATION OF PROPOSED PROJECT Corner of Dubuque and Court Streets 1. SPPF.(S). December 2, 1974 TOTAL NO. OF UNITS IN PROJECT 100 OTAL NUMBER TO BE ASSISTED 62 SECTION A - EVALUATION OF SELECTION FACTORS a. The site of the proposed project is in conformance with the special requirements (if any) contained in the LHA's Invitation for Proposals and/or Developer's Packet. I YES NO — PROPOSAL UNACCEPTABLE (Explain) b. The site of the proposed project is in conformance with the requirements contained in paragraph 2--9 of the Section 23 New Construction Handbook. I I YES I J NO — PROPOSAL UNACCEPTABLE (Explain) c. Site desirability is: U SUPERIOR 0 ADEQUATE U INFERIOR 2. DESIGN AND QUALITY OF CONSTRUCTION. (If the proposal, including the Preliminary Drawings and Specifications, is not sufficient to verify compliance with design and construction quality requirements. additional information which does not alter the scope of the proposal may be requested.) a. The design and quality of construction are in accordance with LHA and HUD requirements specified in the Invitation for Proposals, the Developer's Packet, and the Section 23 New Construction Handbook. I-7 YES NO — PROPOSAL UNACCEPTABLE (Explain) b. In relation to the other proposals received, the land use planning and treatment of the proposed site is: EJ SUPERIOR I--] ADEQUATE C] INFERIOR c. In relation to the other proposals received, the building layout and unit plans are: Q SUPERIOR u ADEQUATE INFERIOR d. In relation to the other proposals received, the architectural treatment of structures is: 0 SUPERIOR 0 ADEQUATE 0 INFERIOR e. The per unit gross rents are: Q Below the maximum gross rents published in the Invitation for Proposals Q Equal to such maximum gross rents Q Above such maximum gross rents — proposal unacceptable b. The proposed rents to owner are reasonable in relation to the quality, location, amenities and manage- ment and maintenance services of the proposed project. Q YES Q NO (Explain) c. The estimated utility allowances for tenant -purchased utilities are reasonable. Q YES Q No (Explain) 4. CREDENTIALS OF THE DEVELOPER, BUILDER AND/OR OWNER. a. The developer, builder, and/or owner have acceptable experience in the development and/or construction of housing, or in related fields. Q YES (Explain) Q No (Explain) b. The developer, builder, and/or owner have experience in developing housing for low(er) income persons. Q YES (Explain) Q NO c. The developer, builder, and/or owner have experience in the type of construction proposed. Q YES (Explain) Q NO d. The developer, builder, and/or owner have experience in the development and/or construction of projects at: a scale comparable to that of the proposed project. Q YES (Explain) Q No (Explain) e. The ability of the developer, builder, and/or owner as demonstrated by past performance is: Q VERY GOOD Q ACCEPTABLE f. There is no identity of interest between the owner and the LHA. Q YES Q NO — PROPOSAL UNACCEPTABLE (Explain) MUD -52500A (3-74) —2— Q NOT ACCEPTABLE 1 ® SECTION 11 = MANAGEMENT. CAP, ITY (If the owner's management submission ns insufflclent:,to enable -the LHA to.odequately evaluate, any items_ below, the LHA may require the owner to submit -additional Inlormation.) I. The proposal conforms to the Invitation for Proposals, the Developer's Packet, and the Section 23 New Construction Handbook in regard to: owner responsibilities for management, maintenance, taxes, insurance, and utilities. Q YES E:] NO — PROPOSAL UNACCEPTABLE (Explain) 2. The management submission contained in the proposal meets all requirements of Appendix V of the Section 23 New Construction Handbook. [] YES (] NO (Explain) 3. The owner has the necessary experience and/or qualifications to carry out project management and maintenance activities. I] YES (Explain) 0 NO (Explain) 4. If the owner proposes to contract with a management agent to carry out management and maintenance responsi- bilities, such agent has the necessary experience and/or qualifications to carry out such responsibilities. [] YES (Explain) Q NO (ExpWn) S. If the owner proposes to contract with the LHA for management, maintenance, or operation of the project, complete the following. a: The owner has satisfactorily demonstrated that no other competent management agent is available. Q YES E-1 NO (Explain) b. The proposed contract to be entered into with.the LHA is acceptable. Q YES (] No (Explain) 6. There is no identity of interest between the LHA and the management agent. YES -. 0 NO — MANAGEMENT SUBMISSION IS UNACCEPTABLE SECTION C — COMPLIANCE WITH EQUAL OPPORTUNITY REQUIREMENTS 1. The owner has submitted an Affirmative Fair Housing Marketing Plan. YES [] NO — PROPOSAL UNACCEPTABLE (Explain) 2. The required Title VI Assurance and any required Executive Order 11246 certifications have been submitted. YES No (Explain) 3. The potential of the proposal for achieving equal opportunity objectives, relative to all other proposals submitted, is: M SUPERIOR HUD -52500A (3-74) Q ADEQUATE —3— Cj INFERIOR SECTION AND BUSINI AA.INCOME RESIDENTS UBSTANTIAL PART BY PERSONS RESIDING JN. .THE: PROJECT. AREA 1. The developer's, builder's and/or owner's firm is located in,.or owned in substantial part by persons residing in, the project area. Q YES Q NO 2. An affirmative action plan for utilization of businesses located in or owned in substantial part by persons residing in the project area has been submitted. Q YES Q NO — PROPOSAL UNACCEPTABLE (Explain) 3. The proposal includes information with regard to the number of trainee and employee positions to be filled by lower income project area residents as required by regulations issued pursuant to Section 3 of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968. Q YES Q No (Explain) 4: In relation to other development proposals received, the developer's, builder's, and/or owner's plan has the following potential foreffectuating the purposes of Section 3 of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968: Q SUPERIOR Q ADEQUATE Q INFERIOR SECTION E - OTHER 1. The proposal meets all other requirements of the Invitation for Proposals, Developer's Packet, and the Sec- tion 23 New Construction Handbook. Q YES Q NO — PROPOSAL UNACCEPTABLE (Explain) 2. (Complete if proposed project will involve displacement of site occupants.) a. The estimate of relocation costs submitted with the proposal is accepted. Q YES Q NO (Explain) b. If the answer to a above is "No," the amount of relocation costs as calculated by the LHA is S c. The proposal indicate- that the developer, builder, and/or owner is/are fully cognizant of HUD relocation requirements under the Uniform Relocation Assistance and•Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 and will meet those requirements. Q YES Q NO — PROPOSAL UNACCEPTABLE (Explain) d. Full funding of all relocation costs involved will be provided: (1) By the developer, builder, and/or owner. Q YES �] NO (2) By other commitments satisfactory to HUD: Q Yes (Specify) Q NO (SPeeijy) HUD -52500A (3-71) EM -M 0 (Dote) HUD -52500A (3-74) -5- (Signature of LHA Official) (Title) i ADDENDUM HUD 52500A LHA REVIEW CHECKLIST OLD CAPITOL ASSOCIATES SECTION A - EVALUATION OF SELECTION FACTORS 1. SITE. a. Recommend YES. b. Recommend YES. C. Recommend adequate. (1) It is recognized that Burlington Street may be considered a barrier between this site and the downtown area. However, it should be considered that this area is now under construction, the stop lights are on order and there is a planned light on Burlington and Dubuque. There does exist the possibility of an overpass but this too is a barrier. Dubuque Street North of Burlington will be closed, therefore it can be reasonably expected that the traffic on Dubuque Street past the site will have little traffic. 2. DESIGN AND QUALITY OF CONSTRUCTION. a. Recommend YES. b. Recommend Adequate. The density of this development is high. It will equate to 97 units per acre. This density may be acceptable considering the projected occupancy, parking spaces provided and its proximity to the central business district. Land use intensity is acceptable. C. Recommend adequate. The building layout is good for this site with the surrounding buildings and activities. It is believed the unit plans will provide the minimum acceptable amount of floor space when using the furnishability technique contained in the HUD manual. If this proposal is tentatively selected consideration should be given to negotiating increased floor space in the one bedroom units at no increase in rent. This could probably be accomplished by reducing the number of units on each floor. This would have an effect on the rental income and would change the financial base. d. Recommend adequate. e. Recommend adequate: -2- 3. PER UNIT GROSS RENTS. a. Recommend equal to such maximum gross rents. b. Recommend YES. C. Recommend YES. 4. CREDENTIALS OF THE DEVELOPER, BUILDER AND/OR OWNER. a. Recommend YES. While Old Capitol Associates is a new organization, the architects, Hansen, Lind, Meyer, has participated in other housing projects as the inspecting architect for Keokuk's-7 story 200 unit project and have designed private elderly housing, example, Oaknoll, Iowa City. Link Inc. and affiliates have extensive experience building and managing residential property. While this is not shown in the proposal it could be added if this proposal is tentatively selected. b. Recommend YES. See above. C. Recommend YES. See above. d. Recommend YES. See above. e. Recommend acceptable. f. Recommend YES. SECTION B - MANAGEMENT CAPABILITY 1. R ecommend YES. 2. Recommend YES. 3. Recommend YES. Old Capitol Associates is a new organization. Members of the association have considerable knowledge and experience in building, owning and managing real estate to include residential. 4. Recommend YES. While an agent is not identified at this time the plan submitted indicates building management, maintenance and supervision will be adequately provided. 5. Not applicable. 6. Recommend YES. SECTION C - COMPLIANCE WITH EQUAL OPPORTUNITY REQUIREMENTS 1. Recommend YES. 2. Recommend YES. 3. Recommend adequate. SECTION D - EMPLOYMENT AND UTILIZATION OF LOWER INCOME RESIDENTS AND BUSINESSES LOCATED IN OR OWNED IN SUBSTANTIAL PART BY PERSONS RESIDING IN THE PROJECT AREA 1. Recommend YES. It is important to consider that this proposal is the only one received that will be locally owned in substantial part by residents of this community. 2. Recommend YES. 3. Recommend NO. Proposal does contain an adequate affirmative action plan. At this step of the processing, work force, etc. cannot be provided. It can be assumed that this requirement can be met if this proposal is tentatively selected. 4. Recommend adequate. SECTION E - OTHER 1. Recommend YES. 2. Not applicable. 3. Other factors. (1) This proposal provides for 100 units. 62 to be provided rental assistance and 38 other units. This should be considered as a strong positive factor in this community with a limited if not short housing supply. (2) The proposal is in conformity with the development of the central city. It will augment the urban renewal plan and enhance the overall picture of federal financial support this city has received. (3) There are no zoning stumbling blocks. (4) Provision of the $650,000 cash investment, which is nearly 258 of the total investmentr makes this proposal more financially feasible than the other proposals. (5) The principles Of Old Capitol Associates and the architect are local and will be available almost daily to observe their development. It is believed this will further insure an excellent project well conceived, constructed, maintained and managed. ROUSING COMMISSION ADDENDUM HUD 52500A LHA REVIEW CHECKLIST OI.D CAPITOL ASSOCIATES SECTION A - EVALUATION OF SELECTION FACTORS 1. SITE. a. Recommend YES. 4-0. b. Recommend YES. 4-0. The site in this proposal is not totally free from adverse environmental conditions, such as smoke and dust -smoke from the University of Iowa physical plant and dust from the construction planned to begin in 1975 in the urban renewal area. This is taken from a point of reference of the individual. Someone from New York would not consider this as pollution or an environmental drawback. The simulated traffic counts with Dubuque and Madison Street closed for Burlington Street between Gilbert and Clinton range from 28,713 to 21,334 at the intersection of Burlinqton and Dubuque. This would probably be the Burlington Street crossing point for the residents of this building. C. Recommend adequate. 4-0. 2. DESIGN AND QUALTIY OF CONSTRUCTION. a. Recommend YES. 4-0. The requirements as contained in the HUD publications are the minimum acceptable. The living area within the units contained in this proposal are minimal. The bathrooms in all units are not accessible to a wheelchair occupant. There is some question on the wood siding proposed. This siding if added must be made fire resistant to some degree. b. Recommend adequate. 4-0. C. Recommend adequate. 4-0. One undesirable feature of this proposal in relationship to Knutson's building is the long corridor and the smaller space provided. The kitchen does not provide turnaround space for those in wheelchairs. d. Recommend superior 3. Adequate 1. The attempt to reduce the overpowering effect of size the architect suggests a wood shingle siding to soften the appearance. The change in color and texture will help this cause. e. Recommend adequate. 5-0. Could not evaluate quality of construction, therefore only materials are evaluated. 3. PER UNIT GROSS RENTS a. Recommend Equal to such maximum gross rents. 5-0. b. Recommend YES. 4-1. This proposal includes air conditioning within the units but has less space than the other two proposals. The same amount of planning for providing amenities, etc. is not apparent in this proposal as is in the Knutson proposal. C. No tenant purchased utilities in subsidized units. 4. CREDENTIALS OF THE DEVELOPER, BUILDER AND/OR OWNER a. Recommend YES. 5-0. It is recognized the Old Capitol Associates is a relatively new firm. However, Hanson, Lind, and Meyer, the architect, and Link incorporated and affiliate of Old Capitol have experience in the development and construction of housing. If this is the tentatively selected proposal previous participation certificates could be obtained and added to the proposal. b. Recommend NO. 5-0. See above. As indicated in the verbal presentation, Link Inc. stated most of their experience in housing, both construction and management,is in the middle income grouping. C. Recommend YES. 5-0. See above. d. Recommend YES. 5-0. See above. e. Recommend acceptable. 5-0. f. Recommend YES-. 5-0. SECTION B - MANAGEMENT CAPABILITY 1. Recommend YES. 6-0. 2. Recommend YES. 6-0. 3. Recommend YES. 6-0. The experience and qualifications of the firm to carry out project management and maintenance is identified in the management plan. 4. 5. No agent identified. Not applicable. 6. Recommend YES. 6-0. SECTION C - COMPLIANCE WITIi EQUAL OPPORTUNITY REQUIREMENTS 1. Recommend YES. 6-0. 2. Recommend YES. 6-0. 3. Recommend adequate. 6-0. SECTION D - EMPLOYMENT AND UTILIZATION OF LOWER INCOME RESIDENTS AND I3USI14ESSES LOCATED IN OR OWN1 D IN SU13STANTIAL PART BY PERSONS RESIDING IN TIIE*PROJECT AREA 1. Recommend YES. 6-0. Old Capitol is an Iowa City based firm. 2. Recommend YES. 6-0. 3. Recommend NO., 6•-0. The Section 3 requirements are not spelled out in the propo�;al. At this point in processing the proposal this detail is not known. 4. Recommend adequate. 6-0. SECTION E - OTHER 1. Recommend YES. a. Kitchen does not provide a 5' turning radius on required 10% of units. b. Does _not meet parking requirement for the zone to date, but developer has indicated that an adjustment will be sought. 2. Not applicable. 3. Other factors having a bearing upon the evaluation. a. Specifications state garbage disposal units to be furnished and installed by contractor. It was not clear if this was for each unit or the community kitchen. b. Laundry facilities are provided, however, only one facility is available. If this proposal is selected the developer would be encouraged to add on additional laundry facilities. C. Several lounge areas are provided. L d. Tubs are provided in the single occupancy, one bedroom units with hand shower aparatus. Showers are provided in the units for handicapped. e. Garbage chutes available on each floor to a central compactor. f. No specific references were provided pertaining to special attention for sound attenuation other than the carpeting on the floor and acoustical tile. g. Distance of window from floor not provided. The heating - air conditioning unit mounted under the windows will protrude into the roomwhich appears to be uncomfortable for one sitting next to the window. h. Includes air conditioning. i. Interior decorating scheme not detailed. It is hoped there will be some latitude for individual choice within the unit. j. Door widths to bathrooms appear to meet minimum requirement. K. A designated space has not been indicated for arts and crafts although it could be included in the community room. TY7: Fi d,,•. r. •.I DaUt rt.,, nJ .1:00: d •_-_.-- .unl Jo• I'Inlal ll. IIUI?I\1: CU\1\Ih�hl\I II T :..• ..... •h.•rt•l.y n•.pw,l+ I In.,n in It.,- ptiu, ipal .uunnut .d 1- ------ _. ._.. ... .__ o. L,• irr+n r,•.1 "n.i.I Ihr !,rua r+6111. „1 Srrlir�n Ill.. Sad,v11I Ilon1ing \• 1, +.lid 1,.10 1•, W- .anu,••I Ina fir+1 nl..r it, h, r. in,dlrl d.vrr ih,•d. In .nr:mry of o, hifnrra during v.m+hurt into In. j_., i+ "el ilinnal (� Finn '1')I^ ..1 \Lnl/•.ryn•r, ( I'\I �_. L11 _. ILS NV I'. r,n.fin 'lot \h.,!: ,. 10. 1, '1 It m, A. I (it 11(711 Ann Pl •.Cltll' I Inti OF 11110P CRTY: _ 1.' ...1 •r.r.. 2. 54e••1 r. \Ian,. Il•••hry 1 T,U..,1•y.` � a. r•a..•.ly n. .'!l.r• ..n., : IP l'.•.b 'ai rurnec Ceur' f. Dubnquc lata City i)J$ linum 40 JOhn::on Ttwa 52240 ). r),.. ..r rr..l..It !" n. 911. vr.0 11 i.. .L.•. •r.r Ino l•r.ra rl....; -7 1 •. �n -1 Fn11 fall iul Craarl Inn coral .11 ..n �.]Ilrr.. (T.IIJ �.(11,•Lv ln•d ( ]Srmi-IL•ln,.h„'! -'). -- '`(d�•.,ar ]-lh+mt...f h.mt. �_]:_h.r,_• .A.�lel_ \u+.•'.t . / I'Wlry I1 Yu I71G a• IJ. t.nl A1:1..•q Ill.ir. •. .n.l Arr• IJ. • Loll R, 11..,1111 1`11111111. wn-I A,r. -11.1.•,111_ \,.n-li.•v. '�11•nq,.+.! , Court Yard Uuts idc 951`0 SF ;,_1 F.i:.linc 100 I -0- - 1 lone Cynmgnity 711_ttlo� ',1.'6 SF _ SITE INFOIi IaATtON _ tIl11LnING INFONMATION Ii. nlexn.lan.r--_._--__�___—__ if.. 1'.. Ildn lIw•. C�\Lrul Lr. Inn•.I llansing _.—'— `_](',•nvrntinuali). y ft. ur 45,000.•1. it. Ncv I i 11vhd.•. ('li'..mp.•n••nl• 300 ft. I. 150 11,1111 -- . t rp•.�n.r,tr•t •..t.wrt wvrJ.nrr)�-- In. L. ..Iar PLd.!r I:. S,.n, r„A .,+!.,e 1-.v Yi..., .,.,n �.. u...rt:.,: n:c st-e Attachedansnnr RO.InC. One Hay Re TIC' , y 1'llru hn 11 a. Elf-ORNAIION CONCERNING LAND OR PROPCRTYI 21. J. (T,r ,.,��- :!.n --_—.___ _LL -___ ._ Rr'Lltivn+hip-Ilu+inr•o:. Prr- IT.nr Id.lithmal 'T—ft oms bold, Anr,n.,] 1111+t,nding +,•nal or lhhrr Il.lorrn .Irlpri rrJ I..,. h.r.•.• Ptire_ P_lirlor Averga•d t:n\cp!I toil- I',.t,d I:n_t .-31al Wtic— `.•1111 m,l llu)rr 18 Oct. 73 $121,500 $8,500 See ttached 11 Oct_: 7.3 s _54 000 -_-- f _ — s 1:34,000-- 75. 111III!11,- i_.d•Ile f-umm,ml,L DL!nn.•• )n. Un..0+l Sit. Y1.rnra•.- IG,trrXJ LI !l.t__S?te_ [A Colo. ❑ VIIIA Ft Iln.•: R•mer6nnn �] F:ln.ivn �g] \.,ne .•'.•w. In r AL_r] Poor Iirainap.• �._] Ilil:h ltnd•r Tnrlc ]� Ile!a:ning Rnlln v7 I 1 5Ct.P__ �:.- . \,,, ..I I.e, h -•Llv in- C. la•.1 F.nnily I.pr 1 nit ._ (}.I: I:1. ._. .I2 445 14 537 12 I- 445 if. TOTAL ESTIMATED RENTALS FOR ALL FAMILY UNITS r 27,164.00 - T - - - -- -- _]n ft Silr • I.npr.ry rttlrn It Open Spaces 50♦ __ 50± f Vim_ Q_�•-.per "10"III •. -) -.e Inil li.•n1 'Intal 111,111.1 llrnt _._ _.. _ 1'o•nl•n+i 1_11__111,6+_ ._ .__.. I•rt 11_n•h 1`•n Il,il l' -pe _ 119,1414.00 1 Bedroom -- Single Oce. (t 2GG (... •,1.....16•, .•I 1 tn} ...._• - � - -. 1 .., :,I l.ro ,•1 I i_,1 in Pr••ir.l None N/A I 1 H40 e,J. VI. 1 Bedroom -- Double Occ. 664.00 296 I. 4,1!14.00 Sq. F'1. t s �. _ per ..t. G. in,,. 1 t ] u Ila rid trapped 1 Bedroom -� ” 266- 2,926.00-j Single-Qcc.-�- TOTAL ESTIMATED. GROSS PROJECT �;, IL6 ia. 'r:.r1 ..r 11,..., "� Uirhnn!,lu•r. ' (- 2 Bedroom I 338 I 676.00 x kit. h-” 11h.w+r I'.ln ; ITr1 L.y r,•:l-, a •• F ;:( llr 1•.,11111 111111th 111,,,1 X I.. l.n :r? F In10 i••. ' OCT..r rv) r tJ11 TOTAL ESTIMATED RENTALS FOR ALL FAMILY UNITS r 27,164.00 J1. - T - - - -- -- �,l ltrrolyd Open Spaces 50♦ __ 50± f Vim_ Q_�•-.per "10"III •. -) -.e -0 i —_ —� X • S. If V.nk - Cuvrrvd Cp.l !elf _ Q1.:•r month -0- -1140 J"• - NON-AEVENUL Fr0V1V !NG sl•ACL _ ____. ,.`pr .,f l nndm rr \,.. Ilnt� _-. (... •,1.....16•, .•I 1 tn} ...._• - � - -. 1 .., :,I l.ro ,•1 I i_,1 in Pr••ir.l None N/A I 1 H40 e,J. VI. r t fill. 583 pi•r .1, fl.. n,a. - 664.00 OlNer L.-Aelal- — 0 -._ Sq. F'1. t s �. _ per ..t. G. in,,. 1 t Nont? __. _... __ •1. I'.. !1a 11.11 x 111nq G.I. of 1.1,:.1 .-1 nt.pn_.11 G \St (' Ilea ; ;C - Ilol ttme, TOTAL ESTIMATED. GROSS PROJECT �;, IL6 ia. 'r:.r1 ..r 11,..., "� Uirhnn!,lu•r. ' INCOMC AT -101': OCCUFANCY : 27,828.00 J1. - T - - - -- -- 10TAL AWWAL RENT h, :, a 11 - v•.a. 1s 333,1111:.00 --- - i--.- J).f.-...Ji. <., 11.1V1J. g s•....1 .\,•1 ♦.r 1•...•.11' .. ..1 Ae.._ 72,142 -- V1- FI. - LG,=:'0 +. ! 1 1140 J"• - NON-AEVENUL Fr0V1V !NG sl•ACL _ ____. ,.`pr .,f l nndm rr \,.. Ilnt� _-. (... •,1.....16•, .•I 1 tn} ...._• - � - -. 1 .., :,I l.ro ,•1 I i_,1 in Pr••ir.l None N/A I N/A ... _- N/A- -- D. FQII;PuCNT A1.D SERVICCS 114CLUDEV IN RCNTI 't"'.•.: If,-, y v.r: ,' i:. 1.7. •. .r. F1J1 II'\II-\1' 11 1O 1. TF_nl'S Nont? __. _... __ •1. I'.. !1a 11.11 x 111nq G.I. of 1.1,:.1 .-1 nt.pn_.11 G \St (' Ilea ; ;C - Ilol ttme, '--' \••11•!'1••1,••••,!•1,• �;, IL6 ia. 'r:.r1 ..r 11,..., "� Uirhnn!,lu•r. ' \41.•,..1 is 6.,, 111, 1• I`nn. 11.11 x; \il I•....•L.f•.;..,p, N!r., x: rmIn., Ft.Ct:.:IT•.,1 x 1.111„• s.-••-- x kit. h-” 11h.w+r I'.ln ; ITr1 L.y r,•:l-, a •• F ;:( llr 1•.,11111 111111th 111,,,1 X I.. l.n :r? F In10 i••. ' OCT..r rv) r tJ11 - \ 1 1 1 I r I Y•„ In l nil i„ Va.• i t Dt 71+pry Rudd - (11111 II I I 1 1 . 1V `110 It. it 11'.1 11111 •1. !1.•,1, a t Ornp•v in-Con•Inulity'SpacL ._,. .•;;-.slimt)I11111 -... 1i'• ___ ._1..11. I r+ C. ESTIMATE OF ANNUAL CXrENSCt LSTIAIATI°U III 1'L Ai. 1. MINT COS TI 1 \D\IDIS rII \'1'I\�F:-- - A aha. 1'nunral 1: m I I'•.pr„• nu•mv - - - f 1. bherli-ing • .. • .... _ _ _ . S _.. .__ A 31d•. tlllu•r l..uo) In.ln....•srnlw -' _ . _ • _ _ _ . _ _ A 31.4 l'm,.l {cool I,.,I...a..•. u,. ....I. _..._. .. .I. IWI r........ • • • • • • • - • slim 1 I I ills �I. TO TAI. AUVINIS f RA I IVE • • ! A .1:. Il..in IlullJinl:.... _ . S nrl Itl,,r._ A Jn. .7.,,. ...... ,_-- -------•-•._--_.-_-. 6. FI -4I Ue.aing On.l A 111, .111 ,•t Ler 16.11.16. p........ _ . 11 ....... .lir llnl ttm,-I)..... ..__ A 11. TOTAL $1 RUC rURC1-•-•---... S___ 7. 1.1; Wing S Ili.[. Pen er -. _ . A 1!. Cenrr..l 11 •••lu in'Ouyav ........ ........ S- It.Rater............. .. FG'S_ ---- _ •O. G.,. ................. --'- 4 L1, It n il•Irr'n 1:, n. O.erhead I0. C.rl,. A Tra,11 IGmo..tl - - - - - - ' .... - II•P.gn,ll A {t. Oni Me,.. 1'r.4a oI---_ ________________ -1 a ......... --_-_- 11. TOrA(. OPERATING - - - - -- 5 A I.I. At. 1.. Fee 11.••.il•n 1 I.U....... zing ------------- It -- A 16. .ln•h. ...... pa;rn............... _.__ .. ._ +_-_.-__•___ __•__ ._.-__-- 16.I:.I,rn.•mat inK - --_..---•- A I: . 11,.nd Ill, ml ... l..__._ ..._ - - 17.1:-I.,net•----••--• --- A In. 011ier lee, .............. Iil. f.rean•I Eli ... Ise - • • • . • -- ----•- A 11). TOTAL I I.1:5 - :U.TOT. let .dI Inyn... l.. ILinr. ane, 1t• 12 d 19) S 20 TOTAL uAIN TENANCE----; SI. Cn.t Per Cw. S.I. 1'1. S 21. llrl:l.rrrinellt ncnrrv0 LgOI)J t Inlnl for• t.l .._, E!IIn..1 r.1 (P1Nir1.'1 l.•II 1 -lone - • • - . - • . - - - _ \lonlhe C \IIIITI\1:1'll \Itl:l • S 11\ \\( I\('- . ..tructmry Line •11)__ ______________t -_ __....- -. _._._.. A, 51. Int.- -\I••..i . 22. TOTAL r:XMISE ••-•S OnS_ TA S I:S_ 23-111".0 Fnl.11e: 1,::1..1.•:e..rd A 55. In.nran:.• ......... _ . _ -- iV.I. S _-�-'- a A 56. 1'11.1 \hg. Inv. 1`re.--- > S --.- pet tIn00-. S ----' -. A 57, FII.\ Klan'. Fee 21. Prl-oral Prop. F.t. ,1+.c.eeJ A 5A. FII \ In.pre. Fee 11.3I _ Vol. S .._.____ ._-:� A So. Fin.meing Fee ' $ -----. per sntoo _._.- . -__-- A 411. ,\\trD I :J } 2;•Fmpl. vn,rnn r ... --..•..•_ .� - ---. _ Aril. F\V l'I:S\I\ rrr I ':1 -- 2n.Other ---- ---- - - --•. A62. 1-;IIrA ❑reerd9,,,. -. - -. - -!T.Odu•r-•••__...._.____ 63. TOTAL CARR',INGCI;C-S.tFINANCING--S 23. TOTAL TAXES -••-•----• e LFf. U. .ISIS 11It1: 1\1:\[111\- - ( '!q. TOTAL EXPENSE & TAXES . = ....... -.. t A it 1. 1eg.11........... . A I.S. Ott-Ill.-Mi.,ri _ ... .. S F. INCOME COMPO (ATIONSt - -----t-�•. --- -- nf••TOIAI LEGAL \NP OI't,ANI'ATION• - • . .J_ +l 30•E.-timmed Project A n:. Snpidrrortnal \:a•t.,,.,.,.•rt I'nn,l...... _ . - •S - 't Cro.v Ineome (lJne 09 1'.tge 1) • - - - . " • A an, Cru.ullan/ Fee ..... . ... . .... . . . .. $ 31. Cie.'„ im"my (Forte Project) 69. 11n1lder .111.1 Spen<et Pr, fit A n1.L • . ...... i I`rrrenlagc_ __ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -_- .0. COntingene1 11.• .rr........... _ _ ......S_ 72•F:ff.•.'li.r Gro., In.ome(I.Nr30: 11)------ S :L.TOTAL EST. OLVCI.OPbtENT COST fr..e!. of ( 33. Toed I't-ject I:ya•n.ev (6inr 20) -- _ '"•"• S^---_-_ LanJ or Off-site Cush(:? Ii on 10: 4 os r 60 +. 34. Net Income l0 Project (Line J.' - Line 33)--- 5 � 7 -2. -LAND W,t. Market Price Of Site) 31. E.p„uv Matin (Llnr 29 + Line 32)....... • --'--,_- •r 4%000 5 J,9 3�500 00 -� H. TOTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR SETTLEMENTt 73• TOTAL ESTIMATCO RCrLACCMENT ;• l.Dl:\F:1.pi'\IF:\1'CU$rs (L{nr :L---------5 i-~-- -COST OF PROJECT( Id!: J .......5 2. LAND ISIIFIITIJISUSS (Or I:anh required --- _ Sewer .•f C.IJ. to -m r1 IL_ vl I:f,l:rnl - _ ImoInl f•,r lanJ argni.i6mil---------------- S 3. suit torm. (Linc 11_) -------------- s___ ---...-__ _._ ._-.---_---- S 1 I.Mmigage Amount ---------- S- '- S. Fvc, PaiJb)'Other Th.,nC.I.h -S -_ ---_ S 6. Line 1 ILine 5 -.--___._•__-_---_-t - ;. C.1S11 IS TI:e1111'\1'nl:Ql'In FD (Line 3 -6) • S __. _. .__...--_. -'-- - - - -- ---•- t---- 0.1NI'IIA1.0PFit 1'II%G It I'I*R:I1----- - - - - -- S 9.ANI Will rIT:1)1IM:11'X-7 ------------- -----•----• 1 I I.OIf-cite Cnn,unrri.v, C.•.t. . ....... . .... 3 -. - __. _ 12.TOTAL ESTIMATED CASH REQUIREMENT Il.ine. 7 1 J1 1 •1 t 10 1- 111 .... _ _ .. _ r TOTAL t I. ATTACHMENTS: _ tRegv;red E.h:bils) `1---- .._ __. .. n, n !.11 i•ne:lnl..l •1..:. ,. :,1 _ _ _-_.._-._.. _. f• I ,.ralinn lJ,.p -' ht. I'.•n: n.d I Ilnc.. ..,I X 1'r. !,t �t.,t..:,: n1 .•1 • n.,ar __ 2. 1 )A1.11ft" Uf Site (Ar.INI Wj,::On Or Pnr•:lwi ci an.I L.'l'..I I I. I ..ra. ,.ql J•M1•, i.m_ i'. il'...... 1'•yll l.. D Drnrrl II.,n Of PI.• rri♦ - _ {' {' ---.. I:. A _ .. .. .-'._ .- - Y,nm :.i ::: l en1r... ..... ,r..i .,r l!...I-.:.•r'. •t',.. r..�;....d.i,. on J- _ _ _Form 2010 E,pt.d 1'v,plau•a•n{ 01,prrt,mity Certife-ati.,n I.T. A lrlteleclnr.a 1 Jn1•1.. )l.ile•inm' ' .._..... FOtm Jt33 Fai i1•ilit�aw \.. L-1'rJit COrpyr.rti•.n It.A _. S• L.idrine Of 1_ut 1rm.•L.•n�th'h.m.aelinn Pri.r ..- 13.A Ser .... ..... 111\1.• \,•,; I.; ------ -----------� _ - ... _.._._ .._ .. 6. Clelrh flan Of Siler• ln.A�.ia..n... e� \:.!nt.I .\ tl I', -....ere 1'.....r.,:.• ' _ . _ \L.n.l g, m•nl I'la.l1-.•1n _ _ n -_ 1 /ri•n. .ai.r lla.:,,•I.nC I'Lnl � •, I I A � - --- \l.r,,r,. n. ,,t \e .. •,1 _ . . _ . .-_. _ -- 2. Gsacral (},N rat ort 4 Mot Selcctcd 1. \O Litvrt a Ilanecn l.1nd Heyr•r, 116 S. Linn, Town (:(ty, Town 52240 319/338-1555 L Jay C, Ouhler, 300 SivingR 6 Ltlan Pulltl(ng, Ttn;a City, Itun 57260 719/133-7511 K. CEit 111'II:A )ION: l'ir nota •.ipn+l, a+ the vin. .ion,..r of Ihr pn•p.......I I..ort);a For. celliff... Ihm he i. I.uu.I iar ,nth tlo• pr i •i.•n •. of the lt. e•b .r...1 It.,. Fe4cral It nm. itq• Conuni„i....... n 1 4 1 r Ibr ah... I. nIcaliliv.l i4r, tion ..I the \.tti..aal Il••n.inp 1, h .....I II'M to fife i•r,l el hi, ln.... i 1, _ li.•1 it ..... ag.n h.....nsplie.l, ur ,.ill hr able In r.noply. otilt all u( the fe.1alfca roe. Ihn.•ol olu. h hue pr. trgv,-ile to :u,vr an, v .d the ..,.I- ... kA,r "n- atb!rr purh $ertion. rhe na.lerafgtad fnnher e.rt if i••+ it,.,[ in Ih,• F.•+t of Id•. leo.. ledge and belief in, iuf.v m.,t iiia .a 1A.t .. nlain.'.1 liefoin r.r in On.. ,hil.;1, or •na, I ........ t, li.tr.! hen•in .uc in ,Fla ....y Like ,.t "n wl.•. t and that tha•) ..n• It'll)d.•,.. ipu., .•! On. I.roje, 1 ..r loop, fly nbirh i, intended as III,- my hrrti ly lot the prupo,ed murtgap• incl that he p.op..,r.l ..n.•.0 n?I i.m hill uo1 . Wan. ...n ur:.•,.I... .... I, ... .r:.t n.'ticn, vl r,, .-td. 'I'Ite undrtsigned agrccs pith Ih, re-le,.d Ilomi:ryl :\.lod..i,2,af ion that inn :.na nt to Ih.•.... u!.. u'nt.. .d 11,.• 1'11.1 :t, nul.d i.n,•., (t) neither It, IMF anyone nuthadzed to art Nr him will deeline In aril, n of rr ofhuloi.a. .:lAc a.,. ilaldr ..:q of Ihr p.ep n) ur hou:.ing it, Ibe a.e lliLonily p oj- ut to a ptospcctive purchaser or tenant becanve of his rare, roha, ndii:b.n or nal nal of u.; lit) he Bill remply nith Iednel, IA I. and le. A b., ordinances prohibiting di.+crimination; and (.:) hi,, lai)nle .v 111,1-1 to r ..... ply unh the t..p.hean•nt.. I tither (e) or b) ..hall he .t ;rn.prr basis for the Coutn4s,ioner to reje. t rcyuc,.t.+ for fano, hu.ine,s oilh ahkh the >pnn,or is Ah"d'lird at lFl tale my W IL ",areI we a"0, he may deem necessity. By, ilt:alltnJ 1 kt Iltcor OV., to O.ae Noyp:nficr 20r- `il:ne'l BY -ri _ t"71� ---- Donald A Sealena r..n...ri REQUEST rOR CO:JDITIONAL COMMITMENT Il): FEDERAL IIOrH\G (. 0)11,11silOSF.)t.• PFlr-Inant to the pInvi•.inn+ of the Section of the Xatitmal Ilousinp .\et Welitified in the (hire going api•I;r Ilie.. and Ill \ Ile f:ol..tie u•.: I pl.. a• 14,.. .rete, 1..ynrst i, hr.rhy made fat the ia.umire of a conditional ramn.itmeni la in•ute a u.arl,L.p• ro. er in,; the laopen)'.Ir....ib.•,I al..•. r•. \Iter r.amin.an a of Ila• appli,-atiuu and the ptnl...... ..I orit,. Ihr and. r-ifne.l : un<i.i.v, the pap., t to 1.r.lr,it.d.l e..nd ;,,I.l e_t. j. ..t In Ow t• oaln'...f .h fit... emn .... it nu•nI I.) I' It \. In u..A;ng a I...... in Ila• Ininvipal .an ...... I rl ! •.L61, ,.If L.•ar iulcl,• t It . o.11 n•p2i..• ny... ...t el I.. in. .pal o.er a pear•) 1 .._ . month.. .n•:tdn.l; 20 ..'I .0 oath. d..0 pI"m to he agreed neon. lnt aranre of a.lt'anren during comas. -tin, ( i•. , i, nol dr•.in•.I, It is undemand that the financing • •p,n-%in the .un•,um A S -- i _aLp•, t to adjo_n..: Flt ,o III,- ..- Iciai ,..Il n: t as eed _i. of the aoututtt of )Our commit mean. Ilrrc%ith is ehrrl for S _ , ohich i. in p.t,mcnl of fit,- .q.pinalien Ire require.) by said FII \ llrgoh.tien,. ... ... -__________•__-. ' (f npcenl lfer.�a jrr/ REQIJEST 1 OR FIRM COMMITMENT 102 FFUI:IIAL 11111 SING 1.0\1\1 I SUO\ F: II: Pur.uanl to the irovishns of thr Srclion of the S.htirn.d lleu%in Ael Went ifieA in the G vexing app!6 A :ell and FILA Rrgnlation, np O .I blr tl.rreto, regnest Is herrhy made lur the isr.uanrc of a is. rev,Immrnl to in -we a rqo y,ge re.cmy the r2.•p ay drsotibe.I A r• Vter e,.mtin.tlon of the applirution anJ the rrepe,ed .ccutll,, lite nn.lelli):n... I con -1.1191 Ill" project t.. Fr de,!tahle nm! i, iul.vr,tea in making a loan in Ihr ptincil..d ano uut of 5 ., , nn hieh •• til 1•.vt inlet -,i ..t _,_- ..•til to -lade lc'.11- mcnt of principal Flier a period of mono" a: e..M 14 n, ar.ottir.ule. plan to Iv acu•r.l apart. In,urance of a-lvaures during cnn,trnelien j _ k. ie flat dvsue•I. it is an.lct,tu...I that lite fin.nchir. e,pensr in the amotml of S -_-_..___._-_ i, ,ulj ret to adjn-t,::ent ,a that the total hill net r,crr.l of lite anmunt of NeFlt • eln-na.nr a1. Herr.tdh A ehrrl for S - -_.-.. .. ._—______- . ohi.6 i. in pal... Flt of fnr api-lie anon .tui ..r :....:.d::- Flt Ire n -pi -11A by .,rid Fit.\ llegol.atiou+. Sipei.._..._ .. - .. ...___ ..... --_._ ?£3,500.00 represonts tares pro .raLi cost of tcse�rch, Legal, auclit and inisccl.lanc,ous carry.i.ng expenses fol: site 103-3. a i t III I i'r..tecl Nnme Section 23 -Low Income Elderly - ;Iowa City IA 22-2 TO: Mr. Chas. Conner -- FHA tlu tii-an ! ly Rep. Thr undt-r.,t:nrd ht-irh re, ur%t, a loan in Ihr ,rinei ,al ainuunt a r1 to bre ,Minn•. ..( �rrti, Y ) I I I : _l_a.l_.2.O�.QsL�O� in�nrrd undrt Ihr pn• illr National linoninp, A, 1, aid Inan to he %I-, 111-.1 by ,t MINI nn,rig.tge ,at it,,. prnla•tir hen•in.rft,-I .! •., librd. In•n•.na. ill a6%intr•. during Iim,frnrlion X IN, ( ! IN 11411 dreamed ;X' FeaniltiIiIY ('..n.1iiinn,.I F'ilnl 1 :ia .•1 '•: rl;:.•;,•,r: ! 1'\I I.il Il -S NI' Vellum.. Ill V.-fig.n:,• Ill[. d 111118 A. LOC- ATION AND DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTYt _ t — .-- J. hh:nlc ry•nl,Iv J. Cru eua 1'ra.l t, C._ Sa ::Ldr ural 711 l•..�1. Benton Street Iowa City _ _ C:cdar �o���` Iowa _ _ _1-- _ __ 1. �- �_ 7. 1'y{.r .J 1•ralecl; 1 ". 1 nbl..t 11111.Ivor: r hacvnlnr 1Cnikull •'•I.III on 4111 - 1"1rIial I:r,ncl - hn a Intal r -,blah hr. r: ('tali.) X1 hr•lathrd f-1 �ctni-nrturhr,lb 1611, 'Gr, dr 7L)� 1 I t—J - I , i ❑1 .Ini. L In�n,l. �,.I r,• 1 _i151 �iD.L- Ii. No. lliky. IJ. 4Nt ACC-/FV,I• II:Jt, 4. „III Area 11,1, n Lf/1 Fr. n•utl.•n Fnc,li,lr1 .,.. .. }(;Propn�c,I It,•o--11118 Nun -Irv. -ll:♦i tin l[ 62 2 _ SITE INFORMATION DIrr.r :i ntel _325 _ !'�!.e 268.7 rL nr 87,500 la. ::�.n l:,,.: (!r r,. r.r. rly •7.,rr[o,L u,l.. �rll .11'181811 ct•) _ R3A 0. .':t uR_I_tAT10N CONCERNING LAND OR PROF \rLliutntal co --\„� irrd Punhnsrhlirr 1':ddorAct to rl. ERTY T% UUI1 DING IN7:H6I ATI ON 16. Yr. 11,1111in.n —., \Iall11Lr. Irltrd nnrl>.1111: �X11'nit%`ill - Ai I I - 1 ol:yr„ll '1114 /1 114111 Ib. I:aterlor Irinlah 17. ?ina ,t.I.,I yyNrm 17.o Ftarr ::t .r.•m le Ile olio:-- \•t' -- .I,,, +food & Brick Wood Jood & Conc Electric .e711141- 2.1.0 Annual n.I III, 'I'ol.rl 10-8-74 _ s 87,500.00 s_—^ FIs 107,500.00 . VI. 1:. irn - 14 Ole Communlix Distance :6. Onluual Site realure/- , ._..� ,: 11:11 vire - 1 !.I• 0111F,talillini; ,87,500.00 r AlCJ 0 [J Cuts Ilor•k i',nlnnlianv J rw r�� _O___ Poor Drainage � � Ilii;h Amer 'fable Lil C. ESTIMATE OF INCOMEI 77% \a• of Earh _Living Area Fat.il} 60 490 990 I9. Na, Parking Spaces— X; C,.!f pneee-X'Sr:f Park \rea-Ground Level Other Levris N i 11. 4r,.• Fluor Are,_ Ll other (lire, rn•, I');,! )IhrIlu�i.L•a•., 14• mal or r Ih•ti era laid litlN.'r NONE X. FI Ilriainint; R.,II•, I litl( I'i to I Iill ItI"\"ntl•nI. I nil 11,'111- ! oi.11 \L nlhl, lirt.l 1 utupu.iNnn of I nil, I1rr \Lni:h I er I nit ki•,- 1 BR x266.00 .15,960.00 2 BR is 338.00 676.00 TOTAL ESTIMATED RENTALS FOR ALL FAMILY KNITS 16,636. 00 open spaces 31 t _ !,rr n..•n:S f f Catered spares Sq. Pet ..I. It.. n,o. per "1• It.. aro. TOTAL ESTIMATED GROSS PROJECT INCOME AT 1001 OCCUPANCY [, 16,636.00 45,868 Sq. FI. No. Itms; TOTAL A`INUAL RCNT IIr: n. Jl . I_ r., .... I —L- 1991632.00� N. Net Relatable Ica -,.Irnt,al Area— Jd• Net Nn.l..l•ir I. ....• I. I. lal Arra_ 319200 NON -REVENUE PRODUCING SPACE Conipo, ilnm rl Vnit I.�•r.41 toll . rill lit 1`t.•j,�•1---- - - D. EQUIPMENT AND SERVICES INCLUDED IN RENT: tl'h,.d i la:rr l:rat,r Y'• L912 T_\_11: _\T NFli\ 11 1 ` -- - X or F.Yrr.l Disposal y 11 . fr:g_ full, or 1. (.•r.l X i Nit C,,;t.l, i_X I. f_.�Dinh,ea�ht'r C its. neat ('1•,d,init il. t R nrrt til i eniat.•nu: fT.)I,ip. O,„) A h, !:r It F:xhtntr•t Car t ' GLEE.: X; IIr.t1 •x' It'll 1'1111 • I• t ,n k Y 1'nriliti's I., J Drap,”' X' i',•,.I ink X' A tt Coad it ian.nl: l :; Otht•.ISp,.,.���1 X. I it let.. I I In 1 air -- --- — _ —y o'CIIIAI I I l l.: l ural Hot ---------------- IN err it l t�;1'11811 ■ ESTIMATE OF ANNUAL EXPENSE:` unn\f•t 1t \ I t\ E.-- I. \d�rrli�illl---........ -firYOU�Vt V _ :IY •�• \!.•,,,, lis tut. lit .. . . . .. . . . . -.-----_-----.--- 1,000.00 1. TOTAL ADOMNISTRATIVE - g I INC_ I.!••,,It,., \I., n. E.•,,. _ . - _ . _ r -1,_000i.00 Furl I fh-at t,g and 10X500.00 rn•t•,. •I„ u:a n.t!, t+..... 5 000.00 ------------- -- _19,000 -.100 - ti, (rah ----------------- 1 000.00 �1QQG_VV --------------- - - )III -r ----•--------•-- TOTAL OPERATING .... • . \I\I\ FI %. I\( I__ I), D+, r.,ItnF............. .:-3000.00 11.1. 6l.--------------- J,0(L_00- IS. - 300.00 ;16. 1,\t. ,link - - - - - - - - - - I-.In..:.t,,.r-------------- -3,000.00-- i III.Gn,uO•I --------- --- ------------------2I) ---------------- 21)TOTAL MAINTENANCE---- _ 21, 111111.1• rn,cnl Ile:.,•,\•• I.IIUr,q t Inial for 'ttll, IUrt•. Lint. 11) - - - • - _ .......... r '^_. TOTAL EXPENSE ..... 15,000. 19,500 'r\\I 34.90- pvr ; Ioiiu_ ; 29,300.00 1. I'.•I.onal Proh, i'.t. \s.r�.wl ---- - rv't < I n,lo- -3,00n on r-Upi. I,.%%Ion •r.,. - - - - - - - --560_00__ 2u. Other ---------------- - 27.Other -•--------- ----- ------ 21). TOTAL TAXES - - - - - - -- d - n_9. TOTAL EXPENSE & TAXES • . • • ' • • . • • 3 8,300.0 59000.01 X7.800.0 k 0.'ESTIMATED REPLACE-hirNT COSTt rs: A 16n. t'tlunutll land In,plp.,•„11.111 , - _ - 145;0010.00 A 101,, 01111•1 I.,Ind 1U,pro\-c•nu•lit 4 ..__ . 125,000.00 Twal 1.11,.1 Iny n„'enu nt. • .. • .. _ ..... 70,000 0t. xrul ("rl nl:�... 860,000.00 A:17. Main Itl,il,lms.__----------- ♦ all, Itnlldinf, A'11), Garap-•_________________ ♦ II). \11w1wtnnildilign--•------ ..... ._...- 860,OGO.00 A 11. TOTAL STRUCTURCS........... ♦ 12. C,•1,1•tal __•- �O, Gl ax FFF_.S- (950,000.00) 11. Iluil,l,•r'. C.n. 0\orh.,1.1 _2 ....19,000.00 ._ Y A I1. It,t!1,11•r's 1',.•f,l - 3{- ; _ 30,000.00 .14 . . . -•----..-_.....10,000_00 A 17. Ilnl,a Prt.l:,ntt1, .. _ .. _ _ ... _ .__. 3 , 000.00 ♦ nt. OtI„•rrr............. 1,000;00 A19. TOTAL FEES ............... _h3 OOO.00 'd).TOT. for all Impnnl%. (Liriv% 4t+. 11. 1: 1 t'll ;1,013,000.0 r,I. (:111 I'rf (:tU•.w \,I, 1.1---------------- ? _ 22._00_ 5^_. f:�limat,•d 1'on_trut t ion I'iuu• - - - - - - - - • - - _,14•_ __ 16•ath� C \1111)1\(. l II \II(1 � \ I I\ \\i I\(. - ,♦ iia. Inl. - 1850, 600 a - 35000.00 t'.Lt..------------- -560.-00 •----------- 1,000.00 ♦ 56, Fii \ \R g. Ill-. Pre. (it. V.) 5,500:•10 ♦ 57. I'll\ L..,rn. I-. ,• ,0. V.1 3,300.00 q ♦sit. Fn \ In••pt-t . 1 u). , ,) 5, 500.00 ! ; i 23,000-.00 ' ♦ 3t.). I udnt�in,: I.t l2 '. 1 f A All- .\\IVO I r.) _.. --- ---' A61.1'\\L\,'(.\\L1 I'rt• 11.5! A62. Thir S Itet ordinR • ...... 1.5Q1�Q4_ 63. TOTAL CARRYING CHCS. & FINANCING- • S 141.1800,00 10 LEG 161. AND ORC \X17. \'I'In\- f • _ s 2 , 000_._00 ' 64. Leglll..... -....... . �., •CVV.UV 5. 65- DfgJlliY.111,,11 . _ _ _ _ _ .. _ $ F. INCOME COMPUTATIONS: 66, TOTAL LEGAL AND ORGANIZATION • • . • .S__. -_2'`00.0C" 30.I:+iinurird Project r•• A67..Supplen„ental \lanagentrut Fund .......... S f' i Gros Int t,mr (Lin. ('12 huge 1) - - - - - - - S �63L-r_' Q 60. Con:-ultam E're - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - -t -1���IIc i 11. (Ile, nit,lu.t (E:ntirr Proj.rtl 69. Nuildi•r .utd Sponsor Profit !C R1,tk - - • - • • - - $-- t $l' { Irn-enl-Igr- -------------------- _', a;[ ' �_93.� ;Il. Cootin••rnry IL•::rrer- - - -S ?. Cf6•, tilt- Cro.+ Inr.•n1. (Lint- 30 x 31)- - - - - - S _ ..186, W- - 0 'I, TOTAL EST. DEVELOPMENT COST (f\r!. rt. f � . a , 272,000.00 p S 11, rnlul Projt•c t E:�pon-rslf.:nr 29) - - - - - - - _ ___-8.0�6�r,�:. 0 La,:.l .r 11f( -o -if• (.os.,) (.nr #-:•.• i Fn 4 6: 1 (07 (1 • .. ._ 11. Sr, In, en,r to 1't ojt•t t 11. i•tr 33 - Line 331• - - i 10_Q006.&s 0 LAM) ILst, Martot Vtirr ,f ?ilr•l 1.00 , 87,500.00 i 11. Eti•rne natio (Lint- .'9 -• Line 32)-------- 43- ` 87,500 .g, ft. ,. S _. per ^q. i H. TOTAL REQUIRE FOR SETTLEMENT: C1. TOTAL ESTIMATED REPLACEMENT 1 359 500 ri + I. DE:\F.LOP\IF1'C CUS'IS t(.ine 71 --------- 5 1,2729000. 0 COST OF PROJECT 11.1.1 :1 t :..';• - • - - • • S -' -_ 2. LAND IXUE:13'fBDX CSS (t r Cosh required t �ourev of Cn,li to meet Rt•, nin•1:,,•nt s: \_:.loot for lan:l ac gnisil i.,n) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - S __$1X500. 0 3.r•,'n'1'O'r.\I.(Line I+"_) •-----7-C-------$_1_359,500. 0- ------•-_._._._--- i •I•. Mortgage Amount " - - _ - - " - _ - � i L. OQQO- .00 1111 i. Fres Pu id 1 00 cr'1'han C 1a h .v - S - Debt-Debty.r, ).--•- 6. Line 4 f Line 5 --------------------T 1.150,000. 00 7.CANIIIX\r.S'r\IL\'r111:1,11IItI'D (Line 3 2099500-30------ ,a. I.NI I'IAL OPERATING 09,500. 0---- - ,a.IXII'IALOPE:RATING DIA WIT ---- - - - - -- S 9. ANTIC IPA 1I-1) 1)ISC011\'1' . - -3x1 _ - _ - - - - - 0. 11orRing -.1P• (2- of \11,;1. \mount) - - - - - - - - S 27;'OOU-30 I.Off-siteConstruction Cc.l%------------- S ---- -- •).TOTAL ESTIMATED CASH REQUIREMENT (Linra7+11+9 E to f Irl ........ g 266,000. 0 TOTAL ATTACHMENTS: (Roguirrd Exhibits) !•�- -_ _. 'rV - I'n\irol,n:,nt.d ?t d,t, al 1.00nt{on Siap -itis 1't non II I ut.m , 11 S ll it �Wt. •,, : , ..I moi•. + r . i •:, Fc , ence of Site ('o tlo - o - _ _- . I I � n I lOptiun of l urchus,) .unl Legal it. F, nn _:_d I nY,i u 1 a: 11 ,i ,!, n 1Ii,f'. , ' 1-I.-C, Description of I'mpetty 1 ♦ E ona : # u .•:,11,11 I. t . , Id .r '1, t . I Eurm -010 F ual E:m to -mcnt irlity Certllic ntion- -�- 11. ♦ `\t.11_1__t till"I I i Form 31331aiEibilit),uv\on-C!ofitCorporation _ II•• E:cidcnl a of Lam Arms -Length Ttans, tion Pnto JUA 1 ll ti F.1.•t \ . ) I-- ----S-i--' _ _-__ - -_-' ---- (1 . ♦. `I »r.l. :,t , t \t•!,ilr� t 1_ \ 11 I, +:r __ .. ___--. _-__ j r Sketch Plun of ro • rntl'Iun ♦ 1I.•I \ o t. l„1, t \ vl i \lunngtnn- t ...,.. „1.1' .,--.._.---- i \ffimlati c 1lnrk rtin 1'Itln I!!. ♦ nUURCSSES AND TELEPHONE NUMBERS OF THE FOLLO:rINGe,—•_,—,.,_-,---,-_—_____..__.__..._—_._—_.. T Ls_DE.VELOPMENT,—INC. -- -- - -- —' -- - 1 _ _____�.1.2_P_rillS1n�e•1_S.tr_eet—____�iQux--�.i.tY•>,—Iona 5110.2,_—.____ . _._.__— ------ r,.•urrel f.untrartor ' l CEF2T11:ICATIQN: --_. r -I'l.e un,Lr-.i;nc,l, as the ptinelpal upon -,or of the- prof -tied moritial:tfr, certdirs Owl he is fauliliat uilh file pr n,i�l.at. ,•I tit,• II,IEI1L`ltI'ntl l,r•- h^ ; ,• ta) Ihnr•ing f.omml<.tnner under the above identified St•c1ion o the National ll ll,in • \, t .116.1 111.11 t.o tit, I1 1 1uf 6i. l:u,•., rr g the rnc:y ag.,r h•1:\ complied, or „ill he able to ronytly, wilh all 111 lilt n•q itr1•ntent� Ihrn•, f ,!u, 11 an• pu•n•qui•. ilr Iu in w.ut, , 1d fhr. rrorl- na 1cr ,r: }. '•r•t Iiia. ti I hrrrin or u1 lite rvbibits or further certiflca that to the hent of his kno„Ic 1pe and belief uu ittfaruuat e.n 1n J.tu ,r rnnt.linr, hr.rr n + li•1t1• I heroin vc in any l,ay false or ineorrert and Ilial lite) are Italy descriptio" .,f the• I•r"iecu or prnp••ll) 1,hi, h i,. ;n:cmled as the for fhr 1`r, jn••r..l mart age and that the proposed ronstrut,iiott pill not violate zania� or Immi, r•• ar rr.tri, un,n. ,•( r,•, ord. "Ile till 1. t'itti-1 sr.rces v.,ill the Federal Ilousing r\thninislrtrllon 111,11 pur:tuanl to lite teauin•cn'ul� u( tile 1••II,\ Ilrt:ul,llion:., (a) neither he tp;r anyone an:hvriced to art for him will decline to sell, rent or otherwise -make available any of the property or hou-in_ in the tmiltifanlily proj- ylocal tct u. a prn,pr.eligion or nationic :.t(,e purchaser or tenant because of hi Iris (uilus facerrc orrrrfa.nl to camplyhith the ttrgnirrmelntsrofteither ltka)l(it (h) shall be proper 'ani nr,!ir•ancc:, prohibiting dtsFFrimin?v , IJd6id for till' (•r araidelpaer to rt ject'�cquesis for future business with which the sponsor it, idatd,fir,l or to take any oilier co;rc, ti\r action he t! Pate! !..��(S port o 1 C_i f'F_•7UGST FOR CONDITIONAL COMMITMENT —' 'TO: F•EOERAL. liOt SISf, CO\I\IISSIONrRt t4 pursuant to the plovislons of the Section of the National ltousiag Act Identified in thelotegoing aig,licatu,o •11,11 I'll N Ii: ;;ul.vi,m. upplirt v thereto, request (s hereby mode for the Issunae- of a conditional cummiUucnt to insure a atortpage eo,c•ring lilt- property 11— ril, d :ll,nve. liter examination of fhr upplicntlmt and the proposed s,ruriq•, the undersigned consider. the prujrrl u, hr drsitaldr-unl i� intrrr-<ted,—snb- �jr.ct'to lite it.,u.tnce of a (inn c mun6tmrnt by FIIA. In making eaann inthe principal rnuonnt n( !—_—_-------- ' vhirh will bear interest lot %, ,till require repayment of p iuclpul o,t•r it period of oavttlt- Ai" ot.l,nl: u., ,u, j plan to be agrerd upon. I Inaur4:e of advoncet, during construction [-_t Is, E, fY not dr Ind. It i., undermoml that the (inntcing v%ficn•tr,irithe amount of S is :.nt•jort to adjuxuurou .,• that rhe t,aal •till not t weed �'F el rile .amount of your cl aunftmrnl. t lirrewith is ch•-ck (or S — „ which Is in liniment of the appliealion Ire rrquttr,l by .aid I'll \'It ';tl,ut,l,n�. I f REQUEST FOR FIRM COMMITMENT " TO: Ff"IiICR.\I. IIOI.SIXG COMMISSIONF;R: Prnuant to the provisions of the Section of the National Housing Act identified In the f•ltegoinµ appliratt,n,and F•IIA Regulations applica sIe thereto, request is hereby made for the Issuance of a firm commitment to insure o mortgage co\rring the property dr..'ribrd .11love. repay - lifter rumination of the npplitulion and Ilio proposed t rcurity, the• undersigned conaidrr the Iuojrct 10 hr dr.urothhr and ll require rd a ranking a loan in lac principal amount of S — \\hirh will hr.0 intt•rr t at . ,ill regain repay Ment of ,rirripal over u period of months,acconling ht aouotut: atiou plan to be nFrrrd insurance of advtnresduring construction ice, t. u.. t dr.irr,l. -- t.othat t i� .ul.j.•rt t,..1,1t,1-tm, ur he U is understood that the (financing expense in the amount o) $ — Iwil) not er rr,l _—� rs of the amount of your crmuoiun.•nt. Ilt•r,:with is check for S _. , „hirh i. in pa);nrnl ,11 tileappl;..ut.,n an.l .v c,,nunilnu•ttI fro rrquit �! by sold FI(\ Regulation.m. Slgnn,i r.,(,aa •r (engage, i Of 11.1 i Ate Rice. :r"unt-- a1• 1 hedute _ _ FOR FILA USEONLY r S •:IA i'ORA NO. 2013 FEDERAL HOUSING ADMINISTRATION �i4e,. 8/72 APPLICATION PROJECT MORTGAGE INSURANCE ,'•oJ+ct N•t rn+ f0: _Knll.i;. rnn. _MO r_tg_age & Financial CO r RrIa ti ion - ----- :t:t.l tht• 1:1-.1w.1i 1. Ilnf sm, COM\n�>lu\I-: 1. I'lt•• n.:dr r•:i}al,•,I IL•IvIly rets It tt:t (t loan in Iltr prinripitl xmiuul ar $ -- - to be in.un•d urolrr fho pro. i::ion+ of St -,:tion shr \, ational Il u'Ivlll' \M, ::alt1 111.10 to :, l' SCl•IIMtI l)y' it (If�l I'I,t r::I ;(• an lhl• ,r •' 1 ----- - - r? t • ( I h,'rty hrn•in.lRrr d,•xt•ri.,r.l. Inr:nr:nu: ill ;ni::+ncr±.!uria•t con�inlr:ion is, _.. 1. n„t dr..in•d X I'ra.ibility 1._..i Cunditi,nwl I'cl••• a: \:.,rt;pt.;or: (_� P\I i � L.0 .1 � li-� -.. \1' Prruana•ut \Iorlgt,;,: Inh•n•:•t Ii;it r \. I.r7CATi0tI .1,�ID OrSCRIPTION OF PP.UPERiYt $,rc+t Yoa. ^ Street `.tunlal`•rI ([Y 1. Cennua Tract [, C,'„uuty cornerof_Gilbert St &1�lash, -'1'y, lo\t)a CitJohnson _ JT low_a_ a a( V: uj •t: tx1 F.IOvillUi -! 1Tul ktl (3 \• \,..Swrin: y• F,; u:.tmlan: l t u u 13.,..•:nent F1c.•n -^ _ y_ ,.-• �(--`�\�:Ib nn Ian 1 •- I ,.tl-1(:r.ttel ,ltractutll � 1 I�If:amt. L._.�It�mt. L._l>pacc ,L � Ilm. (•1'-I1.) {-, Detached=JS'•:ni-I)oluchcd .9 tJ\Jtiradr _)Slab `„-{�:nld,• 't -i,- -�•~ --� ' I iunl•cr of ilnit+ 12: No. ULIg,, le. Lut .\.•en,•ory Ultlga. end Area 1.1, a Lia R�•.�t. �tlun Pncilitlr •, mid ,ora -.-- (lrvcnuc � iiIT, n,w,:d lrn•. r -- Cra('ts room 650 s,f, Ci:.ting_- 64 • • 1, none _�___• ' ___ _ Will t_i purpose dining, - 517E INFORMATIONUUII_UING •11FOOs INf-OR\tA PION Patio 15 00 --ST -..------SITE ;- sCe SU�m( 1. 1,:ed Arc .... th. vr. uuttt Ir..i (-�\t nnnr.u•tnr�•-1 �iou>dnf; -- �C1(:nn,•en ti,.n Lilly It. LY schemb•t=''res s�t• f1• � 1975. ] \lodulen Conyu,nt•nts !toil[ . 3• (!f r••ecntfy eh rnQerC m,tar,lt ovldr•nen) 10. Exterior l+Inl,h l:. Struatur. 5,••!.•-1 17.., Fln,.r Sy stem IS. itea:In,t-r\�4: youreci` color post Being finalized Brick & slabs ten. con hotwater 9. INFORMATION CONCERNING LAND OR PROPERTY: , Acl:LLionshipp-I)ttsinr.s�, I'cr- Scnal or Other licn.r.•u ' r n, Datc 20. zt. --_ :\dditionnl Co+l+ 22. ItLcuyt hold ':\noun! 23.n 23.1, llnt:q.nulinx _:1c1uircd "Ivria:rePricc Ynidor,lrcnlcd Cn,,;n,t 1(y�pt T_oi•1( CU ,d \tr (..:: 1. / 4rlfur:�d Huy-rr O �tlOn -!_,t`•d_,, Il.t 11..:. - ro_m_ c� s113,40-0- s .00 s .00 s 1 13 400 s 11 3., IF00 - .. Utilities- Pu:,:Ic Community Dletanc• -_-- -- 25. Unusual Site Fcnturoe From Site Witter � � - �Cuia '1�F F'il(n L1 Ilo(•k I�onnation:, n I•:ro pion i ��\oac Srwerts ❑ (_� OPonr llrninngo � Ili;.;h ll',Itrr "l'.tblc [--� RctaininK R';dls' C jOPtcr jC�cefly) i (liF Site Impn,v••mcntn C. ESTIMATE OF: INCOME: 27, No, of Ench Living Area --- ------ Farnily Type I'nit (Sq. Ft.) 60 Attended _>( St -II Park compo.-itiau of Unit. _LR -DR K, 1Bir B_-�-�. LR -DR : K, 2:•.Br, B__ -- Unit Ilent Total lloulllly- Aunt Crr )Iwith For Vitit Typ- 260- _ x_15,600___ 319_ - SPACE - 1 ,_320 -- 1 Lc.l l••:.�r \.•. {f 5.-. TOTAL ESTIMATED RENTALS FOR ALL FAMILY UNITS 5 16,920 1 Opcn Space.4 50z "- _ per month Covrred Spaccn : per month -`°• `°m'"••r`''' Laundry -vending @ $2.00 PU --- -�-�---_-•-1 28 :\na-G;onnd Level --- F.(. Ft. Z ,:----.--_--- Per .q. It. 'III,,. . Other Lvvel.A - Sq. Ft. P ; - -- per xq. I:. Ino, !.. Ji TOTAL ESTIMATED GROSS PROJECT INCOME AT IWOCCUPANCY-L j 7 .0 01}8 I a TOTAL ANNUAL RENT fiM:v 11 1 1-' ,•:.•::f1,a) !Z204 L;7! 13. Net I:rn'.i:,l•• 1�.•ri.l,•n1,.,1 .\q•a - -r i-. \ .-�� v,t ,^,_.. e:,•:..•r. ,I An•w-.1�_ - 1 ...,: i.•n of I. :��.. ::_ 1'. •�. , t -.. .. ..._ .1 ' I',.•p.,1al lr It..i.. NLIN•REVENUE rRODUCING SPACE 1 Lc.l l••:.�r \.•. {f 5.-. 1 nE ..,-it i.•It of I 11.1 U. EO_tlPOUrl I' ANO SERVIC:S WCLUDEeD IN RENT: ' ': .'1 Ipt. ' ------. --- . It ,y: ...,: .. t,y,.,'„ It,•.i•.t-•ai . t. \ �; it,.lt \tr (..:: 1. / r);.!, 3 't ,,•1,..� ' It• ,�4 VI 1 IILL Il.t 11..:. , 1 ...,: i.•n of I. :��.. ::_ 1'. •�. , t -.. .. ..._ .1 ' I',.•p.,1al lr It..i.. C. ESi'IMA1'E Or ANNUAL EXPENSEt I.Alkerli..l'------'---' a n, \Lrttaxt•ul.•nt - - - - - - - - - - - - 3.0111•r.................. I. TOTAL ADMINISTRATIVE + �,. I:Ir,ntur thin. I•:xp. - • - - - - t L. Pur•I ( 11v lin; and Itonlc-.tir FI„t \\':Iter) ----- 7. ---_7. IA;:lltirte S \fisc. 11mver-- II.11ittrr -------- ----------------- X ______ -----------------g Tr,r•h lionlovnl- - - _ - { I!.PoyfolI --------------- :I"-.Ofher ----------------- TOTAL OPERATING ------ S I I.Devoraiiii-- -_ - -- Is.Re!•:lir.--------------- 16. --------------16• F, x t ern l i r l a t i n..- - - - - - - - - - - _ 17. Insurance - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -_ •• III.Ground F:xpeno-e--------- 19. Oth,!r -------_19.Oth,.r ---------------- - 2t) TOTAL MAINTE'4ANCE - - - - g _ 21. Rrplircn,rrnt fleseree (.0060 x total for stnleturvs Line •11)-- --.--_-_--,__- 8. Iwo Ell ro 22• TOTAL EXPENSE ----- S 2 240 23• Real F.-t:lt(-: 1•:+t. Asse:•scd Val. _ 1 r. S -_-_--_ per.41000- S , „ ^ I. Por.onal Prop. Est. A,;sassed v Val. --- S ---�- her. -1000- , ?S. F:mpl. 1'.n roll Tax - - - - - - _ _ _ 26. Other - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 27. Other - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ,i •'0• TOTAL TAXES ------ - - S 20,800_ 20• TOTAL EXPENSE & TAXES ------------- F.-INCOME --------- -.F_INCOME COMPUTATIONS: ' 30. Estinl.t:ed \'Inject _ Gro,::. )nvolile (Line C32 Pubo 1) - - - - - - - 3!•Occtil'•Inc,' (Kat ice Project) 33. Effeel(, a Glass Income (Line 30 x 31)- - - - - - '13. TotalPr+j.••9 I:xprnr:es(Line 29) - - - - - - _ - :I1. Set Inr•o:ao to Proj.-.•t (Line 32 - Lina 33)- 35. Exprtt.e Il.tt io (/,inr 99 ;- kine 321- - - - - - - 3 LU! -!_r S 19k," r� H. TOTAL_ R_E_QUIREi4EN_TS FOR SETTLEMENT: _ I. DEVELOPMENT COSTS (Line 71-------- 2. -- --_'. LAND I.XDKI1TED..XF,SS (or Cash te4luired for Lunl acgr.isition) - -r - - - - -- - - - - - S , �1� 1 3 2 400 3. SUBTO.1•.11.(Lille 1 F2) -------------- 5+84; 68 4.ah,rtgage \nieunt---------- ,1__,336300 ;. Fcc:: ['.I id by Oih^r"TlutuC.o=h - S _ 1 24,0 j'6.Line •1 i% Line 5 -------------- S146029-70 1J 7. C.:1Sit n\ F:�)'.AIEN'rRF:QI!IIlED (Lille 3 6) - S - ''23: 798 ! III INITIAL OPIALITING DErICIT ---------- $- -, t�--r-�._ 9.:\\"1'ICII`\•It:U DIeCOIINT-----5� --=-- S 66_- 8_l /5 111.'.Torlini: I I. Off-site Cnn:.triwtina Coon _ - - - - - _ - - - - g _ 12. TOTAL ESTIMATED CASH REQUIREMENT jjjj (Lina 7 it 1-1)+I(I F In --------- 117, 117,339 ATr:,CHbtE`irs: (Rc.uire - a --' ---_ l d Eshi hits) _..- __ li E,idcarr 4lite Cuatrol (Option er 1'nn hasr) and Lr.i.al - �•- I)e.•r.pti•n,ofPri(•r•rty I: -t Tin `t)In 111:_1 F r:plo,n:rat 011portt,nity Certific.a.rin -!-I ,t•: it."i 1 !i;,iinittv.t. Xa:r-I'n.(it C urfwc.ltiuu • - - - - 1 I F:•.i.i•-n ..( L.+•.!:\Ints.Lr•a th 1•raa..trti..tt Pntt G. ESTIMATED REpLACEMENf COST: A 3fht. L'uu�u+tl Land lay)rov(.Iaert:t - - - A 36b. Olhur I..trul [III l•tO%I-Itelit ,4 20 OOO _1 36c. J'ot,ll f.,:t]td hnprotrna nIs .. -.S.z.� 000 .. ' f. -STII. A 3-- Jlain Iluildings - - - - - - - - - - - A JH- ;Accessory Ihtilding% A 39. Garage - - - - - - - - - • ------- _----- A •10- All other Huildiuea - - - - - _ _ - - a •11. TOTAL STRUCTURES------- s958�339 A 12. General Requirvinents _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ S 29 350 FRGS_ $ ,007,6.8T A •13. 13uilder•:1 Gan. O,rllu•,ul ` 2 ------------- 20 154 A i•1. I7uildcr's Profit ' e ------------- BSPRA A 45. Arch. Fee-Dcsign -- ------ -------33,254 A I(;. Arch. Fee�Supe'r. T 1--111.085 A •17.. 13ontl Premium _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - - - - 8 , 000 A •IH. Other Fees - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _-E�,7000- A•19. TOTAL FEES ----- --- 5 8O- ,493 .-TOT.-for all Imprints. (Unes 36c, .11, 12 t 19) J,0881 182 .'+l. Cost- Per Gross Sq. Ft. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ s 52'. Estimated Construction Time - - = - - - _ _ _ _ _ 1 2 \loath. CAIIIIYI\C CIIARGRS R FI\.\X(_ING. -A.Ti3.Ino � �• �_'_ 1 A51.I'll xas-------------- 1-,.590 ► 35. Insurance -- - - - - - - - - _ _ S" -Q 00 A G: FIIA Nltg.Ins. I'rt•.(0.5'e)�,_�8. A 57. FILA Exam. Fee (0.370) P, 58. FILA Inspcc. Vve (().51") - 4 59: Financing Fee ( q;) ?b-, 26 _ .A (30. AMPO ' • ( !�) _ A 61. FNdIA/CN.IIA Fie 77, 2 00 t�044 A 62. Title & Recording- - - - - _ _ _ tf , LIUO 63. TOTAL. CARRYING CIIGS. & FINANCING- - S 145 . 116 LEGAL AND 011CANIZATION- A6d.Legal ---------- - - - - - g A 65. Organization- - - - - - - - - - -.g 5.000 66. TOTAL=LEGAL AND ORGANIZATION- - - - -S 77000. A 67. Supplemental Manai;em.•Ill Fund - - - - - - _ - - -S b 00 S A6i. Conanitunl Fcr--------------- - - - • - 69. 11.1ildrr and Sponsor Profit & Rink- - - - - - - - SU , 6 70 70. Contingency llt:ervc_________________g 71• TOTAL EST. DEVELOPMENT COST (E.ccl.of Land orOff--site. Cost)(SO Fti:3}rib+6: F15d+6!) F:OiS �-.371 ;u8 12. LAND (Est. Market Price or Site) sq. it. o $ per sq. rt. S_ 1 1 1=00 73. TOTAL ESTIMATED REPLACEMENT COST OF'PROJECT (Idd .•1 t 72): _ .. _ , _ S) -1-4 84 7l:•s $,,,.tree of Cash to mr•e•1 Rnnnirn m.•wr-. , Cash Sponsor Credit Sponsor _ 1-26.0726 i TOTAL ' 117,339 - _ 1 ntir+nmutt d <ta'�• t,•tit-�.-�-- Pirsnatl Fatul,ial_\ t:�_•_li� �t.i',,.a,.�: .,Tti:.:.,.r,-.__... _. F w : CIS. U I'rr, 1 , t \'.Irl ._._.._.-- - .- 1, 1( t ioa l :r•.1:'; FIV. t ^-,i_2i (:arlt t t„1'..tt,l n ur \IortC;.,.: •:'. ( r•; - �• _\t`hrtt_rtur.d ! .hi!•if-.-I'trli�r.n.::y _ _ .- \n•hi:c:htra! I ,!u!•It•.. ! i.:.tl -._._ _- - _ `•:,tet• .tad 1'11 \ I' o \, , • I •; _ ._. ...-.-. tt l•iti r n! \ '•.t. 1 I It I -t sur.-,,. ._. _ i D�� f'-ni tion zz it -OR OF CObIMUN-±TY DEVEhOpMENT Under ad,ninistrative direction, to plan, supervise and coordinate the Planning, development and redevelopment activities of the Cit,•; to administer the zoning regulations of the City; to oversee the Building Inspection and Housing Division activities of the City; and to do related work as required. Examples of Duties Plans, organizes and manages the community development and redevelop- ment activities of the department; directs the maintenance and revision of a comprehensive plan; serves as technical consultant to the Planning and zoning Commission and directs the preparation and presentation of reports and recommendations to that body; serves as advisor to other assigned commissions and committees; administers zoning. regulations to include recommendations on zoning variance applications; advises the City Manager on planning and` development matters; directs the redevelopment- and renewal activities of the City;. oversees and reviews the work of building and zoning inspection, enforcing state and city building laws and ordinances, and issuing building permits; reviews and investigates violations o,_ building, housing and zoning laws; directs Housing Division activities; directs the coordination of the activities and programs Of various other agencies with City plans; prepares an annual budget; prepares and presents oral• and written reports; supervises the training of subordinate personnel; interviews and recommends the hiring of subordinate personnel. Employment Standards Education and E:tiuerience: An- y frs;, college w•ri to a degree in city oraregionaliPlanni nito graduation ng related field and five years of increasingly responsibleor a professional planning experience, including two years in a superviso caaciy. supervisory capacity. Knowledges and Abilities: Knowledge of the principles, objectives and procedures of municipal planning and development control; knowledge of the techniques used in the development and maintenance Off comprehensive glans; knowledge of the state laws relating to subdivision, annexation, zoning and land use; ability to collect and analyze data; ability to prepare clear and concise reports; ab4:lity to supervise employees; ability to establish and maintain e:Ere-ctive relationships with City officials, employees and the public; ability to speak effectively before groups. Definition Cinder general direction, to assist in planning, supervising and coordinating planning, development, and redevelopment activities of the City; to assist in the administration of the zoning regu- lations, the building inspection and housing division activities of the Citv; and to do related work as required. Examples of Duties Plans, organizes, supervises and reviews the -work of planning division professional and technical employees in the preparation of studies, reports, and plans related to comprehensive planning and current planning; coordinates urban redevelopment and renewal activities; assists in the planning, supervising and coordinating of the Community Development activities of the Department; super- vises the maintenance and revision of the comprehensive plan; provides technical assistance to the Planning and Zoning Commission and other commissions and committees as required, and supervises the preparation and presentation of reports and recommendations to said bodies; assists in the planning, coordination, and super- vision of building and zoning inspection and housing division activities; assists in coordinating the preparation of an annual budget; attends meetings and conferences; acts for the director in the absence or at the request of the director. Employment Standards Education and Experience: Any combination equivalent to graduation _-om college with a degree in city or regional planning or a related field and three years of increasingly responsible professional planning experience, including one year in a supervisory capacity_ Knowledges and Abilities: Knowledge of the principles, objectives and procedures of municipal planning and development control; knowledge of the techniques used in the development and maintenance o� comprehensive plans; knowledge of the state laws relati*ig to subdivision, annexation, zoning and land use; ability to collect and analyze data; ability to prepare clear and concise reports; ability to supervise employees; ability to establish and maintain effective relationships with City officials, employees and the aublic; ability to speak effectively before groups. Under direction, ada,inistration of and to do related to supervise, review, and participate in the current and/or advance planning activities; work as required. Z__amples of Duties ;_ssigns and coordinates work assignments and reviews plans, designs, estimates, and research studies; provides technical direction to the professional and.technical staff and participates in -the compilation of data used in the analysis and development. of the �tiiaster Plan and in various community projects; supervises the review of subdividers' tentative and final maps, on zoning variances and all other zoning matters; consults with officials and the public on planning and zoning problems; prepares recOmmen- dations for and attends public meetings of and presents plans on recommendations to the Planning and Zoning Commission and public groups; designs and prepares final maps. Employment Standards Education and Experience: Any combination equivalent to graduation from college in planningt architecture, or a related field and three years of professional planning experience. K nowledges and Abilities: Knowledge of community planning principles and the Tactors affecting community development; knowledge of and ability to apply research and statistical methods related to the collecting, compiling and analysis of basic planning data; knowledge Of the techniques involved in drafting and graphic presentations; knowledge of state and local laws related to planning; knowledge of engineering drawing and topographic mapping; ability to collect, analyze, and interpret data pertaining to planning and zoning situations; ability to supervise -and review the work of others; ability to establish and maintain effective relationships with others. Dz2finition. Undar direction, to perform a variety of technical planning - rcesaarch and analysis work; to make investigations and to participate in the day-to-day administration of zoning regu- lations; to supervise the collection, analysis and compilation Of basic planning data; and to do related work as required.' E:camples of Duties Supervises and assists in the design and development of advance plans in community development and redevelopment; directs the preparation of base maps and graphic presentations; assists subdividers in planning subdivisions as to design and confor- mance with planning and zoning regulations; supervises and participates in making planning studies, surveys, maps and -plans; supervises the collecting, tabulating, and analyzing of data related to planning; supervises and participates in the preparation oL land use, transportation, recreation, redevelopment, social and human resource and other planning programs; makes studies and investigations of rezoning applications, and of land use problems, and makes recommendations; administers zoning regulations and advises the public and City officials regarding zoning regu- lations; prepares correspondence and special and periodic reports on planning and zoning matters; attends Planning and Zoning Cormission and other meetings. Employment Standards Education and Emperience_ Any combination equivalent to graduation from college with a degree in planning or a related field, and two years of professional planning experience. Knowledaes and Abilities: Knowledge of community planning principles and the factors affecting community development and operation; knowledge of and ability to apply research and statistical methods related to the collection, compiling and analysis of basic planning data; knowledge of the techniques involved in drafting and -graphic presentations; knowledge of state and local planning and zoning lags; ability to supervise the work of planning assistants; ability to establish and maintain effective relationships with other employees, officials, and the public. , ,,,"', , - , ,i, , , f , �, �; � `,- -,�., - _,,t,,-,-, �� ,., , , ,,_ , I K , � ,,�,�-,�,�-.�,I,t�;,� . , � I., . - I I - I ,_ . -, - , � � I � ,.�i� q - � ., .,.,-'I:-- �, �L �. J �11- , ,�� - - � � � , _ � ,� , �� .: - , - 1.1". I ,;, � � -, I -1, _ , . , ,-, ", ,. , , -, o - - , -,- -t�� -- - -1 ". . - . , : .. - , , __ - , - %�, - , .. . � ', �, . , - , , - �, , . � . .� , �, ,.. , , lk� �� - , , � -1 . � . � .. - I . �z-, , " - ; - , 4.;:,,,__ �.I�, ��-� zj�,N, ,,� h . _Ai�,, ,,,,� ;�: � � - � � , 47 - - r ,*. - 11� . � ., I ,. . -, , .. �;,,, - � - - - - - - � - - � , .t. --- , , I - �. - . , .. - �.7-.4j� ,,--.,� � - 1�1 - I ��. r -, �,. " - - , ;i - - 3,,�� _�. - 1, . �.,, . 'af, " , �1 I � v,I -, , ,. 7p�,�, 1� _*� . , I., , 4 , . .. , - � , I ,. -.j � - -- 3�?, , , , " ."'. . � . ,,_ . ,,, 1, . �, I � - -. , . � I ,.. 3 4� � f. .. - .- , " , 1� �, -�f - - I " , ��V, , .1 g,��;, 1. - .- , - "'.. - 11 .— : ,., �� - a I , . , , , -, , , - - - . - _111�i P�,_,, �,-; . '-.I- ,-�, .. .., I -, , , v ,; . � ----- -- � - �;O, I �, _� - 5�, , " -1, - �4,�-�_ -, .. . 11 �v -, 4�j , � - $,:,I, ,-. �,-. . , . , � , � -, - I 11 I I . It . .-4 I - - -1. Y_ " , , - � , . e-. - - - . , 1 -r �_,,,�,,, , � - 4 �, _� , - � I -, - �� , ** - - , - --, " - ! , - � , % 1� - ----- ; . U - ,-, � h:f-,�N%w-�!�,Ir,,.1, ." �,� � � ,�_ � ,,I� ., - I ,— f - , -,� �;� . ..... � � , ,,_,,v�,,_.�,,, -,I� _4�- .,' ;_ - -_ � ', . . . 1. . . , I � , - -� . .-, , L, I . . - , �; . 4, , .1, -,-'T . , � - '�,-- - -- , ,� - � � - � - � - �'L 'O ', ' - ' � , ., , -1 � I . i -N,, - _ _ I . , � � .. � - J,4! I I � � I :. - . , I � , I � I , - - -, , A.. � Iy;i.,,w , .-.7f - .�, i . � � . - � _ I - I -1 - I , - 1-1-%': .- - �� .. - - I � I- , - - ,� ., - - , : i - ' ' ' - I - �� - - ' -1 -1 � - 4 - , �_. .x�c "I - 1 23 ,-1974-1. :� ,. _� - :1. � � �. 1. �,, .- �11 F, I- , . 11- , .,.:. I , -,� ;- - -,-� - - - f -i,-.- � ; . . - . I . � .- � . -1 - , � , I 'I. I .1: - ', ,-,�.,j,�,,-I ,Z� - � ,� ,. - . - -1 . - _j, -,_� - - ,. , .. , - -,-- , ': -, --"�- -.--- �_,W`_,_.I i:a: . d '.f,'.'_. .� ", ..�. . x - . , I I - �,. - � ,� , �� .1.11 ,. - I. I - * "I. , �,- Z� . , _7 , . - . I � -- , --I -i , ,", - - " �� - 4 , -, .11 -- I , - - , -, I ,.;n, I., I � � , , --..-" 1". . : - � - - _�: i -I 11 ; - , � _,,. 1, �,- I. .; __. I., � ---: � d I � . I :11 If - I - I - - z - -j- . I - -, -,- -,'� � I . .01 � . . - � . ,. �4111 N , � ,.-.I �- -;, � , �� , ,� �, � . � ". _. � . . -.,. ,�!, , , - . -o_ ,� � ___ .. - ., "" � ,- _. 1. �, - . . I .1 ,� _� * -1 , - - . .., - . z . � . ,�_ . ,, . 1, , ,-. , . - � �,,..: . I . - - , , , !� � � , f; � ., . , _�, -) -_ I . . _ _ 1: . 1, I- -- ,. - • - � - - _ . � 1� ., 1. �, � - " _V, ..�., __j,_ ., , _ . _f4 - - - � -1 , - , ,. ,� ,.,,�,�. - I - -1 I . , __ - �_ 11 , - I %, - , - - -�� - _;�,, _,__, I , - -1. _ __. , -, � :, - - . . ;Z-1, _; - - .7� -.1 lkf,�,__ f, I _.: , , � . .. - - " .111 I - 1. . , ,�, I . ,. , I � , I .. . , , . 11 ,; � f7�_. ,_., - z .. I Ai� � 4 � _. I - . I � �� , : , I I I - - � I � � - z �:, . ,. . :. - . � .. . . - , � , , . � � -� - .1 - . .. - ,. I � .1� , . �.,; , ��7 , �, , . . � . - . " I - , 1- . O , .t - �., 'i .- - L -, - - � - I I - -, I :1 � :.7, - - ,r_. , .� � _�. . , ,'s• .- ,.I. I - ,� - - �� , - 1� ,41. - � � , I. ,_ . 1 ,% , �W ,jgr � �� . , , - . �_, I.- I .. - . . , , ,-. , ��, � I , - - �f ' �-, �- -, , � ,� , ; .1 , . ,,�, ,4,_ -.,, , � � � !:I, ,_� * , - �� .1 - - , .., ,. . I .. 1-1, � ..... . , . � . I ,� . - , - . I ,,o :_-� , , 'I." !, � . I I . - __ � ., . " -, __ � , - - -�� ,: � ,� 'i" -'-',,. � ,�2i�z! � . I . , � � .. ,: .,� - ;, , ,� , , , , , � ��_ LI . � _,,. - , , 2�.,:". , I - ..., ' I , , v ,,j::;_� . _�� - ; �,. , , , , :., * .; ,��.�.-- . . .- �. . ,-- I :4, ;,,' -,.,S��Iv;,.,,O, �,.i, . ... , �, " , , �% , , " - �S, . .. � ..- ."jf, ,4 F; . - - � , - . I 1. �: . � . .. -;�, - , . i .: Q . , I- ,A ,.. .I - J� zv,�,,-,. -. ', , � , . . � . - - � — --- - , . - - -.-I. . - -, - - - � . ,., �� , , - .3, - -,.,-,. � . 1. I" � 2�.,, - e � . I - � - - I . � �rl " - I V. - �. � - ' x..1;.11 I. -, .�,j�' :, , , -. �'7-- ' - ,,'- - " * - , , , _-,--, , .� ,--- - L , , , ,.�, 1� ,_ � - �, A.�,.. , " �, , ;, �- . - � " , , I �, �� �, , , � , -� ��,._ - ; - I . � .-- --�_S- - , - , ,. ,-, ` - -,.,7 -, - � . �.. I � I I , �� . , ,.-,, -,. - � '. - - - , � � ,,-, - � . � , " � , , - � , - -� , , .,._I,I - , � - I ��_ , _;��, : I . - - - - - ,L- 4 .,- I - , - � �. � -. .-- � w - I lr . _9 -Y "I ,� - � - *_ �I -4 . � stem;, lder,-�, 4� �. , I , , - �,�, ". , I Z, , _ . ... .. �, -�j. ," , I., , , �,", ..".1. , f ; t7l - . , - 11,,� I I .-_--,� ,,. �,,! � __ . � � -�, -,�, . - �,. 1. ..I., - �r_ - * - �, -, , _. , ,, �. �. I. -1,1�. , f'. I I ........ A -,,,, '... - ... , � _. ,!� __ __, � I . -, -.N-*�-�RLi�m�idii'Drive-��:-;'k--.--,,��., " -- -11 I,- __ , , -, I � ,_ , I i" I 1. 44T ,- � �_,_,,.��, t%,,,� -�. - ;,' ., � �, : �-,,, - , ., I 1. I � .1 - . I - - - . � , I _,,, -, �- " - " . I . _vfr" , .. . 0 - � ,_ w , -,,,-, - ". " ," - � . I I I - -.,- -;,z- -_� - � ,-,-. , ,. ,... �,- ,- - �V�_ �, ,, , � . - I . - � - - .. -, I ,,- - 11 � . . . , v , -- , � ,_ � , ., - � -, _,j . ,!� ., , Apart ••,{ .H304,,� - 1, ,�,,,- � � I-' - '�jl'*21 4 1. I - . , 1 .. I I � 1. . - , ,-, - ,, ,"'. - , I I .� I - I � , . , ,-...- I , 4, I ,., � '� " I" . - - - - -, �,` I L.-.-�'..., . .. � , 1. . �� - I � ;'� - ,Lf. __� 4 _ . - . I , Xmwa:� `-��S2240 - - - - - -, -, -o- "'A'. I -,!,e!- . . ,. . ; � ":, I �- 11. � ", ; . L 0;;g 1, I z , �P.�,, I I . , ,. � .. � , - � . � - ,. , , _ - P �,-i I -1 - - .._-,: , .. _ 1, - " fAf - � _� ,��,,.. �! � _,� - ,7!� " _., - .i ,�,_ , , �_ _�, - � - , - -,. I , �� - -� - J%4,Z� . I . . . '. -1 . . I - �,:, �, q!�� - , -,- ...;.- " -1 �, - . , , - . , �, � ,;�,. _, , - - . �, i : � ., , A - I,� �,,1-11 - - * I 'fV di ., , ", -- , -, , - I - . I �� ". ,�. � - . , ,-. I � , : � - I- I , - � m � �_ ,.� � . , , " . ,_". � �, ._'I �-;_;,�Z,i .'I' -, - ' ,;�- �- , . 4 - . . . I I � r � � � . I , I I - -�,_,,,, , ,f ., .,- -, ,� ,,� '_ , " _ .:, - I -1 � I - L' . - - - ,,� - -1 . I . .,,� � . ,., " . " A, . � . _�I� L .' ' , . .. , � . I . "I _ _ 1:,,I, I .. fib. ,,,.,�,�. -, ", , ,-,- - , , ,� - .5� .1. ,�, , , ; ., . - - - �,♦ , - � � . -- , - - -, -,- , 4 1 ,, ,-,,;- , , - �11 . ��_. ,. . ; .- ,.� �f?,:� �, , I . . , , I - . . . ,�, - ,a,��t - ,��j . . , � - . -��. ,. _. - , - ., . I� .. �� -�- I _- ��.- ,� I '.11 � ' - - - I ,-I,-,-� -�� - � - -, � Z, - at �� ftii-,�, riga],-, � 0 �:_ �11 0 i --,,1974 i';. thd -, Mty�,: CouncU',- ' � 1, I,-:,^ - , . , , ,� � X� , ,-, - ,,, �, ,�:3;._, - - - . ,I;_,.�'t - �,, � ,-�, ,. , , � . -... � I., ,�, � ; _� � , " - � I - , " , - - , - , . �� . �� - ,� �� , � -, ,,�, -I" - iq-" 11 t ',�, -, - e - " `t . . 0 ,__ - . .1 ., .�,. �� - I I _ � � , - .1, , �_ - � _: ,� _% -, - , , �., , 1, .__ � . . _. . 1. I -1 . I ,11 - . , . I I- .. I .- I . � - 1. � I . .. �' .44]. 6f7- - - � � _,, �- ,. - - I - -1 , jV4, I, �� I , _., I I ,, -7 � -- . �; , offic addi'Oh 5: Me ..'your? letter cm- I _ � � I I ZO�?_ , , I . 11 � Y� subsequent . . , 1, -, - z L- , � .� .1 I , _ ,.,�. 1, 1. 1, - I -.,,I_ ", , i __i, , , I ,. 1- . I I __ :1 . , �, ,�,_ _ ,�_-,� , ilibi� "I-,,-,,. � .11 7 .�- ". �.;._ - - . I � . ' 11 ,I -1 � " ,� � I � 11 I . � � - - - . - 4 - ��_?;,,, , , - .�_ II. -f. � .1 �, -^� _� xaz � . � ,. I. equenty,letter, coriectii-ig'. j � � �� k ft -, 4W ii�: , - , " � . ,_ . � I � -1 " �,�,. .►11, .�5�_.1 .,- , - 1, ..;--.; I - - � I , I . - � ..., � ,,, - 4.% 11 . . - , .. - - ., . I ,.� the - �' �the,.� WqJdan', 4 I had z4lsd',�. be en ,mcedved , by, the � Council 0 � f, , � . �, , . - �,. " ". � >>-7{., - - I , � , , ,_, . L" ,� --,,, , ,-- ,- . I �. - ,_ P�� ... ,' �, - � '., -- - -,"', , -i�m ,,-,� , . - . I . ,_;,. - 11-1 '�T_ ,-� - 111��., . _ � -,- ,. -,x I I. .: , ._�.,� _ , " - - - ,-'- , _., I �.,, -, � . , "I' -Y I..,.. , fz -,,,�z -,� �,I r ,�:, . _ �; '.,� � - � _.. , I I- , - , . - .,��,_ " - - -.., --- , ,�f X-- - � � - , I . - . I.: � i�, , _.., ., �6�:,, ,t , , 11 � I . - - � - 9. I_� .. 11 I .�, 1-1 'Ir,fl�, I M ,�",.�� . I - I- , � - - ,_, ,%,.�,,.�' ', 'I,?t0,,%7Ko,,-,. �..!. ,,,;�� �, -, - - - . � ,,,�-;� ,�, - - --z,�?M.,-,:e, 51t �`-,w �;.1111�' ', - �, ---M�,.��- Z, �_ff� - J. .� .." , -_ �.-, , - � � .,,- _-, � , . �_.. � . 1-111. - � - � " � , � . 1. ", .�., � � ". ,., . - - __ . - 1� 'Z- 11 ,, -, 'I," � .1 - 1. , - - --'.hd6,, b600i,,,drafted�'*obii- ij6ht*,�,to--.GovQrnbr - the �_. :)��, f .:, ,-..,-A',�letb9r,_ 1. , I - I . . _ _ - � , . . � .t- has A- - ,, 4�aj.-, - ,,,;,-,�_"m .. , � r,-� i , �_, -1 - I - . City: . -r I .�Aw�tlicwstat*.,-;,� - ;a.il ". �� , � =400=1=q'i ��Y, trhhbit: � .�, .". -,� - ,. � I-„ . - - , .- f� -•� -11� . - . X�,�� - - _ � .. , . I.,l. rl,�� ... I 11� , 4� ,, � � ,,,;o� F- f, , ,I , - -, __ - IX.I.--.11� I u -1 - 11 f f,- 1, ; - 1_1 -, ., - I - _” ' _�..�-_�C�' "r '��� -�'.-.�,4L'�-"I;.:�'l-",,�-1"� �,`A ....... � `,; , !, �� -----� , - �j. �,-,. - ,;� �-, -,- , ��;,',tq_ , " , __ � ;'�_ r L ' I I _ - I t;! ,,,,� _' : - . I.. - .� ,1,11�_ Z, I .1. .4.1, ,,� - ,__ -1. 1, - - r. I � � . Ir 1 4 )� -, � Z _,,!�.�,-,_.,,,.� - � ., , : , �- - . . I 'i - - I I . � " . I. . I I . - , 1. I , . � � 0;1. . 1. I - , . , .1 1. I � - I -� 7 , ". , � ��, ,- - -, I . the - , . . � � I 1. � ThaAktirou' f6r'brirAginq.-;�thi ��vAtter-z,to,,,.tha,-'attentiion of e - .1, .. I - .., . - � _ I - - . I I. I.% , . , - �� " - 1� - I-, , , � - ,;, 1� , ,,.�.J�. :,- �, -r - I I I M�.�. I,i, ,�' - , . , - a - . - �, , - . __; _d�� �,.�-t�-r-'e��-X".,:�'�-', , 4-- - �-:, , ''. V f, , *� � , _ . 4, i.N:i�j��,-���",-.Z�IZ,"�;4�;.;,�-",;;��,�Z4.."�i.�-'*��**- . � .. . :,� q, �� ,,� �!, .�, I -,� . . ,.. � � _ _ - , , ; -, r •�� - _ , r , - . ,.. .., . � ." ,w ". ��-,_ ,�,�*- , I tea - � - -: � - - . - �W -., W _ , : P , ,-_.,,-, -f __ - �:� -, - Y - - - 1 - .&, , . , � , , _.,4;r ,�,., .- " ,� c , z , ., � , . " , , .I- �'_ , I' � .-I �Iz-;:i6 , ,�,-, 7n,�. , �.��,_ -, - 4��,i,,_rtk* 7, � I ,:, . I f � , ,��!:-&,., ,.:7:g_very,-trul , urs* ,. I , _-, - "' - I .z , �, " -7, __," _,'t�� '� - ,�, , - _ ,- -1 - _ I ��-,- - 5 ,•' V_ �. - - ,Z� ..- . I c',11-1-1.0 ''I I , � , --,-I, " ,� 1. , I, -, I.- Y f ,_ .., - . - , �� - - . -,' , v -,� " I I , . , I � 0, , v, ,;, �Lr, . I , ,_t� X, ,", Y_ _0� - "A . � . , .''.. I - - _��,� �.,__ I— ,7 �., - - 1. � . I . - � �; _- I - . I I I -,, , " , ,�, - 1.-', , I..., - ,_�. I. - I .111f.. --1 - � .. I . . - . I �_ . 1 11 1- I 11 I I . " � � , . I � � - �:: . - I ,.-, . . . � . . ''I - - - - , . 0 . , -,,.. ,4, , --,-z � - .,.- - ,,! �_ � � _- 11 "I - ,� 7 ,- 6 �, �;� �It - �,,,�F., - , 1. ,. * , . ,�� , 1- __ " - ",- , ,� - - .1 .1 f,, ." A"': _, .1, -1. 4 - : .1-1 -, 1, N., ,i_ .-." X,f�! " 4 - - _ 'f" -_� I �'_'� "' �'� - �'I ' . � - - - - , . -r-,��� "', ,,- ,� ; �,N_, . -, , - ., , . - , - - � , _,� -. _� � . � .,- - �: -11 -:, - - ,- %; I , , _� !� : -14 --f;, - ,;,, , - , - - � I - 4 � - .1 �� ;�,:,_ ,,,, � ,*Q&, , ,�-- � " ", - ,;" - _', . 1� -I -A , , ,I-. � T, - - , - : . , , ,-r� .,t.,-�, � . - -T�" ��,--�- .., - .. , _�7!?�,_ - , I I � ..;. - .11 -, . - , .., . . � c, 1 4- . '.,k., . , .� . , - � �,4t, -, , ,� . -.1 - ,-�� � - . - ...", ; fc� - ,. , , . . . -,-- I -- . 11� ,_,,� .1,,,_,_,: I . 1- � ��,,�j,z -- I , " - � "V " 1. . 1. . , , - . � , . , .. , . - I - , I- -, 4. , -1 , _,-, , .- I- , -,-.. �i��;, Z,, _-,-r , ,_�_., ,�,- , � -, 11 . - VA. �,, , � - . , --; �, � �,-:N-- ,�A .1 , _ , , , - - .., . . I . I -- ,- , - - � - , , , , , , � , - - .�.,,.�;�-,�__'��?'I�z'�,� - , � , � - _- Nl .- - -_ - . . ,�Im-i��-- - -, . ', - , , � . - ,. , - -� - 11 - ". � - .-�, , ,. - ,L:- "' " - . - ,4 ,ct . , . , , � .;' _-,,,,� . , , I 11 - ��. ., I �,_ , - � .. -11't - - z . � �- - -j", . I - I . , 1. - �,r --,.-, ,,�,",..i._ �_ ; - . �4�rl _;,-,-,,, I ", ,!�,�4,-, ---,.��,.,,,_,, K, ,. , - � . - � � . . I I - .,. . ,,;.C' .. " � , � � , , , 1, - . - ,p, , f;. . .- . I �� , , - I , . ; �,�.-,,, , ��_ �_ - j- I , . , -_ I"It - . , 5 ,.. 1, � , ." I -. . � , ,.,- ",,A- ;,,�,�!.%1-1 I I , � � � , ,,� , " . , - -,: � � ,, . .1� � , Z ��.-, , i , A . - I . - ;�, , , , k-, - -� - I � I � - , .1, . � fzll _�4i�_ -'.,,- , - .- -,.!, I. - ,�-4, �, � _T- * . ,f, , .. I beAnis , R.�Z, irhft�, � I . ..�.,. . I. -, . ��,, , "" , , , - _. � r, . � - 1: -; - � F-Z:q�_ - Y,'. � I_. ,,�_ _7, - . � -1 11 I I .1• .,-11� .� . 1, , ". - -I �,� .. . - -ill- .Ar,: I - . -1 _. _ - -,.- �, I , , . I , 'I � I, ,,� . - 11, -1, I _'- ;j ..., � .1 I . , , , . - I - - � 1� . - -, ,1, *F I :�,-�-, �P , ,.�, " 1. � I . -11 . I .�- f �. ,- . ,,� � 1 4 't. , I �" - - , � -of", ". I � , _., _ , , A I_. . - i�.,A,-�. ,.-.- �,n ,,, ., �,-� r, �, -� . ,.6� � .1 .1, _;,� - ,, ,�, ', �_ _` ..-,-. , -�,: 47,,� ,. -4. �,�, * - c; _,t��, - ,,- - -j;- .,,--.-.-,. -,,,Xotjjig,Cit*-Mmager - �.. * , ..., _ �:. -_. , I ' , � _,� t-, , .' - , - , 1.1, ,. � '� ., g :4sf� .-,.V.- � � ,.-. , ,- - - , I.,.. I .11. L' . .�_ , ... �t. -..-"Ti .,�, - � - 1 -:0W:-,,�1- " ,---, I , i , ,._'. - -1 ��. I I ,,� % �� - - , ��*�� - -v , ��X* -1, � � P '. �, . c. . �:� -�, - , - - f,,A,.j��,'__', le .1 I. ,_�,4,,� I 1111r," - . ,,,W�,-,--v,-- . :. , z ,- .1. _ � ,e�, ,,I,, ,-- -At I ,�__ - I I . - I!, 1, - - . , � I :,,Z, ',------ - , q1-. ,,,,, --, . - ",--, �, 11,�,..il ,. ., �!V;,I I � " - 1. - . I .�, � .,, - . - I � ,,_,. - v,�.,, -, .- , -, . . � , � I . ,_,� ., .1,1,�...,� �,� , ... � � , - .,q. ,. , - 4, . . L �� , _ - . , - � ' &- . �,. ,I, 0_:,,� L; ;!�jfr'_,; ,,� ',. ,� � - � - 1. I 'o .11. - -, .�,, "I , .. � , ,w -, , , � ..f.,,T- .. _ _., � �,l-,". 0 . : �.�,,. .,., I-, -, _��.,..� .."; � ...if , , � ,� ", _-. �� � I - I- .1 . - - . , ,: . -1 ,. � .. _� ., , "r. I - -1 . � ". - � . I' T - - ". . _ --11 . , IV - , - , - , . - -_,�i�A -�A 'r 3", -,. . .. v , � , �- � , -11�, . . , - .� � I - , �., " , -1- 17, � - , � I . -0 �, � i�W.� � , �, -.: ,�_ ... . . - " ,. ,� . - ,, ,. V_ . �,�-,V. � - , - 0, , , . � -� - - = 3 iuw *�-- , - � l�� �; ., ". _ - _� I ". - � , � .:� --,- A, _� _- ,�7�,j , � 'D V r�n*-D�; �,�,,, �. ,�, - e,L: - , - _ Z L . - - ;r:,i � . ` I' - ,�� .r� i!t�,f��, - .-I . - ,--.. , I "I " ". v_fL_ - . 1 " .. ,_ - - - I x., . ,-,.. -.,-. _�. - , - . , - , ; -,�� -� �,� , , *� '-. ,_ .- -, �j,k�,.,�,- , . . ". � ��, ,_ _� ,� ., I , " �, i, ..7i � - . -4 " I V. � � � -, ,. -* 1, � �k�, � ,,, ��, I.- t",- �,- -, _%,.. ".;,.. , - - , � , I _- 'f,. : f. ". . I � ... . .. � Z�, � , -- -� -- - -- ---- �:,. , , , -, ,,,,, _-, ,�,. ., � �_� I ��, _ - " - L -1 ,-J, I, . , �' 0 .k, -,, . _ �., � .�,-_�,, ��, - , `-�,.. -1 �, �, -..S;f, ". ,_ �, .- . ;;,.. � � - . , .. I- r, - - �, - 11 -:: ,��Z�, , � -- 7,-v -� "..,-, , �.T,, - . I - -_,,i,, , , A ,�y � I -1 .. ,-�;.111. -1. 1. I _ry I . : .. ..... � - . " I - , " - , - -_- - i, 1 , ,r, -1 . - , - * , - - " , , - 1 , � _ .. `;,-Lz��,� - T� ','7 _$I- ., �j - - - ,,.,� . ,I I - . . � . I I -1-11 I - -,'§r� " " - - , , -1 1,, '��, ,� , ,. , I , - � -1 , . ,..�, 1 �,, � .., .11 . . ,� -.� ,;.,,. " �__ 7.','7 77.� I I.-KII, , .- - . - - - � �. I . . ,, 11. . 4ftll� 11-:1 ,,, . , 11 .. .. " , - �, �. - - .-i"- .;, - - I --,- -1 --�i-_-i -:- - � .1 ��---,�, ', , 4r � , .,. 1, , , .11 , � ",I L �' "' -,.I, � � _, .'�f.l.Z., � '� 1.1-:�,,., -, � L ".-, - 11 � . . , ,_. . �' .Lf.1 ". , !L , 4 1 �� � � . .,� , . - .. I - I , �, � �, - ', . , , ,. .1 I � : - . � - - I .. , , �--- -, � - . . . :--', � - - '... .�, �� . , , �,% ,.., I .'L - - - t ��!,ff�� -f�P,�.:� � , � � ,P� . ,. - - .' , , , - I I I - I . . � I - ,� -_-, � �.--% , . , , ,,_ C,r� , � ". �, , ,:. ; I � , . , ., . #L� ,� � �;), f, , , ,��-,�- _�t - - � k � 4, v,�r,jt �,, ,� ,�;�I;�� - . -1 -- � _ - .,. " I �� * , , ,?-.m'. . , �L , - I I � 11 I ... �� . x . . I - I . ". � c . , �� , - . 4 I - ., - - j, '.., - - , - - , , V� " . n . � . - � . __ ," r , . . - � _11, ", ., �: -, , :�: , - - . ,,-' � - ", Z , �- - - - I I . . I � I I - - I � �.,�; _. , , . , ., � , � . - . .1 , -, -- - ,'� . ;', � . , � - . �; �- -, a_- . , � �. , _ - -1. - � ".4 � - - . K�-J�-�- 1; . . - - - � ... . "I . ,. .. - � " - . - � , I_rj I , - , . , , , � I - 't , •- , , I . � . - - ., � , .h '� . - .�. - . I I t , .� � - . . � _ , L ,. ,_,��,'I,,�, 7� -� ,? �, - � �� , , __ � "I . , - ., _-- - � � , � .- . , - _� , - __ �.�' 11 I . . - I I . � . .�; , _1j�- , - � - I - _'r � . , �, � �,.�L, � - ,,, ,W� I I ,.�� .1. . - . ,. - , �, - W� � I .11 " �. -., � , � -_�, . - - � - .- . " I - I - � � � .. _- "-' - .,,." � ��. �.'.. '. �- _' I I . . " - � ., i _� , , , ,. . . ,� .- � I � - -'�� ! �.' � � . ' I, ' - 11 � I , I -, I I I _. ., .. - I - �_ , ,,.,r:, �-,,- - � , , . , ', I . , - � � � I I 14 , , , �,if " �,�V �, '_�' .' -1 -1 � .-i'.' - ; ., - " _� ,. - I - . . � . - - ,-- f� -, : "' -L' ' _�' ; �I V "' � � - - T, . I : . I - I . . I . i- , I - , , . ,, . , ,,� -r-. . - v - . I , , I., -1 . , � _,� , , v ;, 1. ,1� , �!, ;� - A - _ , ,a I -, ,.. .r . I �:: , 4. � , - � , I ra. _.; . '- � - L_r �,,' '- �� 1. I - .- , ,, , . , - � I I., . I � . I . ,; � -- '-,,, .,,-- . , 1� - ,., � - � I ., . , -- , - � . �_, � � � I I � "arant" �A_O � 1, - .: I .� - ; I .,:�, , ,. , - - � �� " ,��r, - ,4 - - -_,�- -, . � � -. . � . , ;I ., - �� "', , , I�V, , , I �:� "; --z ,_3 ., - �.,- ,-- � �,,-,��,-� , ., ,I i4,,; -, , ..,., . _ . .� , , ., ; - . I - I , - - � I , - I � � - - . � � , .; - - , - - I !,--�W', T.�, � , -, - -..,I.-,--,- . � �. ', �'i; �� % I . ,-7,0 �, : :,-.' - . . - I �I . - .1 ... - ,-. `� 1, - . !;:Zj ,., -�, , �- - ., - I 1, � -'-- .1 .I- f, - . � .,. e . : - I- � � I , - . � 1, � .. ,,- , . . , , , . I . ,�� . __' - ',r' I � , -1 , , , , . - . - " , ,�% � - - � I _- , ., . . . r. , � I , - �z % �, � - , I ,-' � iS I - -� � � . , I 1� I � _ I I, ` I .1 ; - w, - ,-- I - �. 1� - � ; . �. , I � , 11 I I L"' � � - - I .'-' -, - � I' , - , * , -, �0,!r, ;�tk� - �,,%- t,� �,.,,,%�� "I �., , �,,� - v�, , % � I , . . � . - - - - . -1 - . I , �, 4 -v '� - ; , - . � � , I , : ��!_`� , I I , - -- ";c� -��_ . - I , �. . ,. < .,, , . , � , �; I - -. , -, � , 'I; ;C, -,.I �,S. -1 �1_1 � � I , , - , .�,- , ,� -, - . _. ,- � I 1� , .� -1 -.1 ,f, . - I . , ,� . ��, i, � .��;� ,� L , -., , -, , , � - � ,f � . .7 . -1 ; , -,',-, , , ?�. ,; , � I- , 1� , � - �- - - . � � - � , . � . � � � � � . -�, , , .- , .. �, - ,Z - , � .. . , . . . . - . � I �, - - - � . - , - ��, .,:.t, �n , �- � � I 11 - _, �,�, 7 , � - :L '-, ,` � __ - �' ' ' t '.�,L � , .' . _ , " ' -- , ;I . - ,�. - . � � - 1. . ,. -, 1-1. " �, . I �-1 . , - . - , I - -r.__ , , � - _Ii, 11-*- � - �,-', -., Z_�14 � I t zgj.�-,. , - - , , il, I - -� i . . �,_, � , ", � � ` . , __ ,I 3, ,-, , � , - ,�, -,,_z �- ,� - �, I , i , - ,� - v - x . -1, - 11 . . I I � . ,, t�. �- - � I � .. �., � ;?Ilnif, `_ , -, � �. ;� �� -j- - � 0,;�,�-��-n-�Ydi, .;.i1rt,_,FI,__If� - - - v 4. 1 - �_,�, � , � .% � . ..,�,."s,.. -1 - m, _ 1- Lz�,, ]: 4--, .. ;��: .. ., 1 -�_4 4�,;,al .. , - � f;_f,, , _-, __��t - e �z:- - � .. . I-.,.% �, I.. � j," - .. � � , CHARLES A. BARKER R. SCOTT BARKER December 17, 1974 The Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Iowa City Civic Center Iowa City, Iowa 52240 Attention: City Clerk Re: Approval final plat - Oak Woods 6B Dear Mayor and Council Members: AREA CODE 319 TELEPHONE 351-8181 Due to some administrative difficulties with the legal papers it is necessary for me to request that this matter be removed from the agenda for your meeting on December 17, 1974. When the documents are in order, I will deliver them to the 'City Clerk in final form with signatures and will, at that time, request that the matter be again placed on your agenda. Thank you�for your consideration in this matter. RSB/km F Ve y� truly yours , 1 Scott Barker i WHEREAS, the City of Iowa City, ?owe, has negotiated a contract with Stanley Consultants for a copy of said contract being attached Riverfront Study to this Resolution and by this reference made a part hereof, and WHEREAS, the City Council deems it in the public interest to enter into said contract. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. 1. That the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to execute the Agreement with "Stanley Consultants (with corrections written in by City Attorney) 2. That the City Clerk shall furnish copies of said Agreement to any citizen requesting same. It was moved by TlrAnrli- and seconded by r7Pprncaa that the Resolution be adopted, and upon roll call there were: AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: X Brandt X Czarnecki X Davidsen X deProsse X White Passed and approved this 17th day of December 19 74 ATTEST: City Clerk - Ma61 1 P RESOLUTION NO. ECT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF That the\'bid of in the amount of $ 1974 Sanit of , IOWA: for a construction of Sewer Improvemen Project within the City of Iowa City, heretofore adopted by this Counc hereby accepted, the same being work. The Mayor and City Cler , de'scribed in the plans and specifications , 19 , be and is st responsible bid received for said re hereby\directed to execute a contract with the as id ! 4, for be binding on the City until approved by this J .r It was moved by ? and sec of the resolution as read be adopted, and upon roll ca AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: Brandt :Q=xe.Ddx Davi sen Czarnecki Irltkez=rt deprosse White said contract not to il. by that there were: Passed and approved this day of , 19 ATTEST: City Clerk Mayor FOR THE CONSTRUCTION,OF-THE-104 SANITARY SEWER PROJECT #1 and WORK INCIDENTAL THERETO IN AND FOR THE CITY OF IOWA CITY, IOWA Sealed proposals will be received by the City Manager or his authorized representative of the City of Iowa City, Iowa, until 10:00 a.m. on the 12th day of December , 1974 , and opened immediately thereafter. Proposals will be acted upon by the City Council at a meeting to be held in the Council Chambers at 7:30 p.m. on December 17, 1974 or at such later time and place as may then be fixed. The proposed sanitary sewer improvements will consist of the construction of a pipeline using vitrified clay pipe and concrete manholes with incidental construction on the following property within the City of Iowa City, Iowa, to -wit: Commencing at the existing sanitary sewer manhole at the south end of Keokuk thence east to the property line of Hollywood ,Manor, Part V The kinds of materials and estimated quantities of materials to be used in constructing said sanitary sewer improvements are as follows: 1,961 lin ft 36 lin ft 13,765 cu yd 450 tons 8" Vitrified Clay Pipe Standard Manhole w/Casting Sand Backfill Crushed Rock Bedding A-1 All work is'_tole done in - "strict compliance with specifications ^ prepared by - Geor e aR.k_:Bonnett ' P.E. - the plans and of Iowa City,Iowa,.which',have. heretotore been approvea by zn Council, and are on; file for public examination in the Office City Clerk. =1 ty.. of the Wherever reference is made to the specification in the plans or contract proposal, it shall be understood to include the "Standar(? Specifications for Construction on Primary, Farm to Market, and Secondary Roads and Maintenance Work on the Primary Road System", Series of 1972, Iowa State Highway Commission. Each proposal 'shall be made on a form furnished by the City and must be accompanied by a check drawn on, and certified by, an Iowa Bank and filed in a sealed envelope separate from the one con- taining the proposal, and in the amount of $ 3 000.00 made payable to the City Treasurer of the City of Iowa City., Iowa, and may be cashed by the Treasurer of the City of Iowa City, Iowa, as liquidated damages in the event the successful bidder fails to enter into a contract within ten (10) days and post bond satisfactory to the City insuring the faithful performance of the contract. Checks of the lowest two or more bidders may be retained for a period of not to exceed fifteen (15) days until a contract is awarded or rejection made. Other checks will be returned after the canvass and tabulation of bids is completed and 'reported to the City Council. Payment to the Contractor will be made in cash from such funds of the City that may be legally used for such purposes on the basis of monthly estimates in amounts equal to ninety percent (900) of the work accomplished as outlined in "Method.of Payment". By virtue of statutory authority; preference will be given to products and provisions grown and coal produced within the State of Iowa, and preference will be given to Iowa domestic labor in the construction of the improvement. The successful bidder will be required to furnish a bond in an amount equal to one hundred percent (1000) of the contract price, said bond to be issued by.a responsible surety approved by the City Council and shall guarantee the prompt payment of all materials and labor and protect and save harmless the City from claims and damages of any kind caused by the operation, of the contract, and shall also guarantee the maintenance of the improvement for a period o£ two (2) years from and after its completion and acceptance by the City. The work under the proposed contract will be commenced within ten (10 ) days after signing of the contract and shall be completed March 1, 1975 Time is an essential element of the contract. damages in the amount of fifty dollars ( $50.00 ) will be assessed in accordance with Article 1108.08 for each calendar day required for after the above designated date. A-2 bA Liquidated "Base Specifications" project completion The plans, specifications and proposed contract documents may be examined at the Office of the City Clerk. Copies of the said plans and specifications and form of proposal blanks may be secured at the Office of George R. Bonnett, P.E. , City Engineer of Iowa City, Iowa, by bona fide bidders upon payment of fifteen dollars ($15.00 ) which will be returnable to the bidders provided the plans and specifications are returned to`the City Engineer's office in good condition within fifteen (15) days after the opening of bids. The. City reserves the right to reject any or all proposals and to waive technicalities and irregularities. Published upon order of the City Council of Iowa City, Iowa. City Clerk of Iowa City, Iowa A-3 5� ,z1'r-.- �...... -��_- -4i4 - L. �- , - - �,.-�-,-.-.W".,�k'�i,'-����r"*;z,- , j,.il, -;. -, � . �,' - ..I. . - .,�,�,4-. - -, - - -�.- f..; � ,io,- -%:, v,-� , - '�i - - -- -11 .f.,jaO �.;, , Ii- - I - , "', � �, `1w-` 1� - ,-'4 l - �-.-�:..' � .� - - '. -!��, � ,di ,.';,, .17 't itZ-�', f't'. .l,--!, ,iij�� 4 � ze, 1 , v� _�l,A•j5�, �,�W,7,: � - .. ,F!�� - - 1.11t__; -57 ,-;4,�.� . '. � . � . Ig..." �, - �,. - . - - � !!tiE A ii, -11K, , - �,i�;. 14� , . . C , - , -, - r, _,, I-- . I 1, .. . . -1k - .'IA- ,-- 'I .le l I V .k�- ,JE��,f�,-W ,,,� ,,i`'i � , - - I 1,1; : ", - , -11il- . 1. 1___-_-1 I I 1. -1 . 1 ;4 - _t,-, 1� ` , � . , � -, � -, �g ._1 " A I �, I 1, � I - - , -- �-,, -, �-,� - - -- - i " !�- ;, , �-, 1. 1. . 1. �.�. � : . � I - , ', , �j �. , - " _ - t, , 4 -`111I - " ". I ll - " _-1-' � j- , . , ,; . -,-- - - - - . -�_ l : � -- �* � " -4l',- �.�Ii'..� �,W�," -,, t. �'• -�_ " . . l " ,_ . - - " - 11 , -1 _ , i , ,,_ i _; -N- �e.. , - " - I �� � - - , - _ - . , ,.,�:;-- ,� -,� �'. A.v�-P ,-,.- , , �,ei 41_�,',�* ��,:, �ir'j .4 7 . - �' ., �:� '.' . . 11�_171' - " , - , _ , q � ,�`,� ,tl . - - 4_1 -- _LL, ..� -, . ,� � , ,i- , . " j - . � "' , , ", .." �. '. - - 1�-, ,_� ,lEl,,�j 1--iii-.1�11 -!(,:. ,,�,.; - , - - .,,.,,. - � .2 l -.-.; - - � * - '_ � _ � , �'.. , - ,� , , � -, &".1 s C, *7�' , , ". 7� 1, � 7, � - I, _, �,,: - - �!��� , "S'.-4 . , w :., I �I 7��It. � . :�� , % � *t� "r -.'�� ,-, I . . - _,� , .. . I T»iT . -,,-- - �-,._;,- -� �., .,- -1 -1 I --A pl, � ez.. - 11.- -'� -. �. -- ,, . - , �wv_ __ -, I .:;,;,_ I i;..____r,__.. _ � , --i �, - i; . � - - - l, " - _�. ... ;,�,. .� ` T`� , �!.,.,. , - � "- ��-, 1. " t _.� � i - , I � - ;.. .. - I - " ',._..� ` . I _ . `,;l ,; --,,,� t�*!."- `.- -- I - , - I , I , .1 � _� . �� !�.�,, . . - 1�1 . . �1.1 .. . 1. - - , . , � . ., 1-1...tom - I ,,__ �.- , " ,_.�, . " -1 -l: , � 4, . - , - ,, , ., , _� - A-- , .e.. .1 . 4�; _ ��F. 1. . - � -_ , - . , A- ',-,,l ,,-� �`.,:�'_' -'Deceszber'-16 ;.1974 - , . �L -,, - - �l " � ' Z. #� , . . 1� - t- ., , - ,-.11 _ _ . �.A��_.ill.' I _ r i- I? - _.. - _. . � �_ .. �11�..t:'. , . " , -11 . - ,. . I .1 � �I - ,." -,i - " �� , , � ". .1'. - , � - � I_ � 1 �� I � �_- � , ,,�7 : . - : I - : i., -,,-. -, I I I I ,� I �. _7 , . , I , -. ,I, , ;_7 , It � 'lio -.1 I .: , :� . . .1 z � 1� .- - , - , - o � -Z - . � � , _�;, . I I -, t * _ ;' ,,*,'.,, ,I_ ,I- i - .. , -11 .. :.� � � ,.�. : �191 � ,* , , . . - ;,:� , t . m . � � � - I � ` -, ., - , - - I- I ,,- _�,� I." 1.- . , . �i� -, _V- . -1 1, ti, I 1: __:, i:', 'I " _�,, . I VX. , � _� i, - �' %, . _- , _. - . Hw , , , - -�, - i , , . . I , - . -,,. �,,,�, k- '� - ,_ - - �.; , V i I,- _. ..".; � , i ,'� - ; - , � ,C. , , 'I -1 .. , - , '�,, ,.- __40 - vormdra -�!.,]', -, � ;, � 1;i� I I". I _fir'.`t - , , ,* ,� . .... -.- t, � , � � .� !E�. -', .. st � __ " ., '.." lIk`1.,..�, ", . -T � -, 11 .1 -,i--_.,., 1. , - -1 � _-I- Iona - � . , - .1-.1 - City, � - - - - � ' 1: -VZ,-:' '.. ,d - I � " I— 11 . I . - I -_ 1. I I mi. 1.-1 ". I 11� � . L - ' ' � .1.,A, - . , City i I, xowalt7 52240 ;�, Z i : �-�,.� ! li ' ., 1. . ' -�.i'� 1�1 I ,�' I- I - I - _1owa: I I i �. ., ,,, __1 � , � , ,-, - -r .-. 1 4 , � 4 ,',* .... I . . . . I . . ..... _ -_ "I I ,-l , . lg � � I - It . ► - If , -, - � ,6 _., , , � yb� il,1, . "m , -1-�_' %11.1 1--,".... I �� 4.�.:.. , 11.1 . . Ddmx.� .1 ,;" I "-1 ,� ,?�� 11 - �, - O"., -, - -:,�- -!�, "i -rt.,�� �m -7_1�, 71�, ;., ,�t, 1mr - - . . -4. " . 1-11 1- _ - ,6___,.!_ -1l-1- 11 � �,- . I.. : , � it 11 &��----jj"�z ,�. :Z..'- -..., . I,-�,r %I . �. I,-d�i I - 71:, , � . I - - -, -Z --Wr,�,. -I-, -� -i _f, , �, , "". --- - � _ 11 . . .� i - _ . -Z. , o . - . , h, . - ., 14- , 7,j, %�., - , . I , ,- - .1 .. I i" - , ,t,' - - I i I " � . I . ,.. , ,9 - .., -,- , . I -� - - I - City ` � I I ,- � - _,��r I k,!� - - . ., _� � 7 , j,���maiitinl,.th6:.cit�i--council� of Iowa: C .. . I , . , ,_ - - . �_._ -_ I � � �. * - ,�,, I� " 7,;_ , ,ii. -t . - : %'� -t 7e .. I'. . . �l,!;. - �It;. , . I I , . - - I I 'i � - - . . . I - i6�nijmg - th® Lafayette- - , , '. ., . _ . - 1, It �� )i�til I i 14LU11 - _� ., � . l,. I 0 A , .__;--L7-7=this-project, - - . 1. 1: � - .. - . O , �,,�,': :- � ��V.,��-. ii 4 1 - ... _ .4 �,�- �_-i I, - - l. _Ut.11 .. -_"I' , -,.��, -,;.. , , - . - -0 - r , o . j dcrt . p -;�-.,- -_ ., .. . . I I I , .�- � , �S , , ivd v6datli UimWW - liii .- this , - `this' � 0 , , �� I *..,., .:. _- t ., � --r i 11 , Z. , , �,_ -I.. ,,, nidi -�;� , -.;'--'-'remove ",_ . . �. 11 _.. I . - I—— - - . . � - T. -, "7 Z� - !� , . - - -v. 0 1, - -_ � �, I ... , � _"., -. -! , � . - - -, r F6!th6�biidge�:-4�Thiq - - . - , .. l, ��i this �f� Sabandoh,liiind N � . f -, - ., _,� � S� .11 ; . "I - - . � � I- I , it .W., , 1-1 ,.,,"!.,. ,Z. , .,. ., ,7lm�,.�� , ', 11'� -'I,,-- Z-, � I . _ I .1 i7� I .. _ I _w`: --.,i..1,., t, ..� ... - " �_...;,, �. Y . I .� I � - , ... � , I . . � , I ' . .1 ... � I I . , i - . . ...,., Ik- L,,I,,. 'r,."�.il�,� ,A�J�Jjj, .�'Vj�'.` , - - - , . . � .,� ". I _ - is colis �.dlmduAid6n;,'� �-. - -� - , I . I a--, , _., _ V. . I- -, . ,� __.: ,� . � T I . , � � -- - ", I -, , '. ,__. � . �, - t,�, IKZZ �F- -. � - __ �: ,-, . . I �, : _�, , ; I., �, Ae � _ I F, l�..K�_ I `1I4 ,�, d . � . , . . . - .,;-. - -��, , , � .,� -,_.. � ;,� i,74, 1 i;;..�.., ,I "'O -, 1�, 1. . . � f� .- , � . -y �P.�� 7."", - .-- - �!. � - ,- : - A I ,v ,.W� ,� . -1 1� �_ ff', A� � -, .�., - .-ii,.'%-1 , ., '. -!Ii.i, -- ,4;3? .ir. L I w . - -j -, I - _ :,Wl � - .,- - � 5 , : - . . 1-i" I.,i ` I �, - . . _ �kpioiii5 .. � ,.- I . I 4: .. .; - "bn;f4ith4*':fd4v4qpu �� - � - - _,.. - po; - . I F"�_,, ' i E i ' ' ' ' " ipixtum -regarding- � �, , 1. � , -�, ."A oxmAiC ,., � - z I � I '. I _ - ijif _,. _ _ . . � v ..01�-,---,,-, -,:;� -�;&;X.-�j_ I - .. I I I -li--:t, �, � -. I—, � -11 .. . ;, ;:. i , , �;... , ,-, . - . .1. � .. ,i,, --' .I- .. you - I - - -; -40 - ..�, � t 13-i -4 queitioh*`N�pleapk, -:,not, hesitate ,to �;_.-- - A`-Mmre�auy� . C;� I .- .1 I—", µthis ,; . � . . 4" - I- ,,,, - ,1 V � -, -I-..- ;. - - , I * � , �,i� � ,;f, iz�i, .,�-, � ,�_ , "'I ��:,_'_ I � I � z I � - I I - .- _�'� � I I il.. - , ... I m�_,iii,,�-Ta'n;p�4'e.: �V�_--�!�� -_, - ;--, ----Q �� -- I --- �� . - - i iigt&;� -X��-;, �-,�_._�, _'�;,z ,.j� . :_ . .., . I_-'-- i-,-- -. _ �-; ,; � �,-� �i ::69ff4i6►zi-5, -� ,.,�,��,5 .1, 'ki. it, , '. " , .- , t4i��.�, , - -11 .. I., . I �w �,�U-;�,_�A� _.; � 1'��, � il. I . - ,-1 ,,� I'-:- .. - . - I- . _ . - - -, -"--��;�,�", , -1'3e , - - - " v , .1 ,I, .;..2-' " , -- - - I - Af- -4ZI - I .. .... ,- . ,,,-. .;. - _� �,,,-; � I , . , 1. �. '. III ,., - , , , - -0�',-i -,"j- � 1. .. -,, ,- � y - 1; I,P�, �6- n �,S�- . � - .:, ,,-,_ _,oi,; .� �:.. �, ., __�, -�,,.� - I P- 4,- r6 mr- , � " .it. � --:'� ;' -, . ;:,t - , ',4 ., _;,�N�,_'� � , . -, ., - I - , ,)M-,�'FA- `�i,w, erY . , ., , , . - -�,�.� - ; �Z� ` v , _'. -_ �- �, � � - , , - - �- - .- � i � I , -�'. �,-�, - 'i -- ,.� - --, ... i � -.- � 1 "; , -.e -,- - kY'-;. ,-Youra p : , ; .1 I I I � , - _ - - ;-� " - �,�,'�'�, , _ � ,_ 9, - -,, -,-- , . - ; -1 I I � � �'. .. 1- , � , , � ,_ _;,".,: ', � �,-_!, ,� ." r.. I ,I.�, ;` , . . � - -.1 .1. -1, ff -,-. -4 - - . o " ,�.�, , ,�-.xi L. ,,',r " . . - , ...-t- � I -1 .. I il . . -, - . .1.1 I ".,. 1�I" il� * -,t� " L�.';� _,I "I 1, -.-. . . - - -1 1.1i;.- --i".j. ., _,:_�,, , - .. ,4.;", �I 1� 1, '. -, iI 'I '� .p .14 - "..'i,l,-. ', . I _1V -,. - -u ';� ,;,��, t: , , 0 , if .. , . ., . il� . Z� ��, 4 -1 ', it- -��;-_, ,_ I � , -; , - .� 1, � - �q - - . '. 1 -4i � I ,-ib� ,�k - r . , - ,-- il. lxl!-�,, �__.-,�:,_ � - _�Ir: _ . � ,� �. �X ..� - , . �. , . I '.., ��� , � it. �- , . . . i ";1�11,11w, ,'Oiv.rl� _0 " I l_ - I . . - . � &ii i-16 ."IA.,__11� � 1:�,, II. ,�,�. �),��'�- - - : ,� 'I , - - . - � , , . , , - � " - - - , � - - � - .,i� �'. . ;��v-z4i, , . , , - f��, , , , - .1 I .. . I , . " . 1; . I u - � � A�l` :' 4 � . .z - i" - --� , `l' 'L� � �- ije, 1, , �1, I �,,,'. ;' . IJA - , � 1�, �, � Z - . V _VF.Z4✓� - � � �� � 'i .W r -.'f �, , - , - _N -, . , - ,� _% _�,, �. . �!4.�.� . . . , - . :, "?. .Iis,,� � - - __ �, . � 1. , ,�-;�., . i�r*. -_7 e. �,'�--, .-"4; ;t�-�!�-T*f,:�X; ,t��-,-�;' li,I- I- S,;-, � , ,* ili� _.�: `..� -� , ��, , . . - . ;Jz - 6.l - - . . ,t- -, , . -Z -1 1� _:j: �.St. . , I - � -,t-,,- -ri;L .� '.',,��,q C'. , . . - .r I I � I - � _. - , 1�zl-7!t, - r , � , , ". � .�'V �Z , it. 7, _-�, - ��. '. . - . . , , . - -, - ., . 1�1 - � . . l, .,� . . . . . � . . �-,,�, "' 4i...r��i, 1. -,. - . , , I ; !Craft � f - ,-1 , , . ,;,�-V��-�Lfmt- `.":i�,�� .t ", iT" I 111��t ; , 1, - -. , ^ ,,, - g, . � 1, 'i""I", r _', �', - .,_-� s.:- � . .; z - I � , I, - .� . _!� - ,,-, - it�--�;, - i, � ."-4�, �. �;i , , "..t., , __ ,;� -_"r';1, 1 � ''*x, -, l - Li,, �,� _� _ � , . r�. , - * '�_. ". I I � '. ,ji,:fA�-Z�Z-_-;;, � %,Z ji� ,� , ,.. ,% _ ' ".: I jlp�� ,;� k - I I_. 3, , -��. ,l , , , ._ 11 - - , , " ii;�- -'�6��-�?5��'*�,-, .� �; a ea� L- �� . , _. . . . .1, - � r .� - I - ,,,, J�, i ill l, �, - 1. , -V, ,:. .VllFt.�f4 - -, -, - ,� - lwl� ,.�4�1*�;,�. ... - Ir_'�`,i�', � I,"' r� � - - -�F .";. , jz�!� -�. ,,�-,- 51t, - , ,_�l ."t' 'i _' � ., , -�, "-t�'6 'i , , 'r, , � " ,_ DRKsi*d --,.,j,�'1�' ".. Itc.". . --X4 �i_A.W _�I!.,4. -i]i,i,,--. �,�, - 1, r, 1, �J. -1� . -,"- I 1. . --_- r, .- I - -si,,_�- -- - "--_- r �, , �, - " . 'i- ,_;��:��. , -1 4 ,,� � - , u A- U, ,,,.r.,,- � I - �iil.`��.. 1, , ���'��'���'.,-Ii7";-9i,,� _ . , _., 'I., � - I .- � , , I- I l' . � ,,� .1, r � ; � .- ". , � . w 7 ._%; _,� I .- . _ , _�, � . -, - , , , I -A I ,- , , . - , , - " y� . '. .- - " . 1� - - . - � I ,. " .V i .. -, - .1.. I ,-,, i , Wi� r�,; -� f� - , � i . I , r. I& , - _, ;� , � -,-. � v -, 1, �,,, , , ; ." , A " . .U,�, . I - .1 .. - I'- i?, __ �, 31- _, 7'.�` � --" 4�11, 11`1 _ - "'_' I V - r�'i , . ,,, , - .1 -, -4� � ,Z, , , �---,-�. , , , � � � - , . , I . , 1,_ ,-.z ------ ,, _. : -. 4_z - . �t-,� .. , - 1, SSC j� , ,.--- ,- F � , , . . I I , -1 I . . �, .�I � I ll� ,'_- J - -, - _� '_-L- " ,_ - - , - - I � . - . � �i, - , .. '. 1. ,- � - - I :-r-�, � r � -4 . .. . - �1_ .�, � - - r L-� . _.. -3, _.. r.el- Ir.,.... r _�, �l� - - , I , ." 11, %, . r I � . ; -1. -1. ll� , .;, , . i; . .. � . I 1, � , ..- . ,� - .1�1_-;,. . , t" L- ' ;' ' ' �, , , , ,: , ` . , ,_ re I - L ' 11 � - ,.r '_!��- , - �7-: , , �, � i - I <... 1 � `�'j., - r';�'.ui-!", - -1 , -,'t � . . " � - �:�'.-, �'. 'i, i --;�l , ". -�&��- - �_, , ",r:. -".' ,., . , r -�;�:_,'�_ , ��', ., � . ,�; - - � i . ; , l f, - � r I ., r_17, - 1� "_,� ....... _-, , _.�;�'4��'� �1� Il- -' X, �. , I . .1 � "I 1". � - . - . 1---, - ,_ 1� - '17,6, I-, - -, - t � - ... � '. . '. I , , . _1�1. - �-mZ q,1i, .i. . I I I , I . - . - r, ,..'I- I.. . 1. ,� . I I 1. , I. -� I. ,;� l"a - , It --, , ,,Z,�.., �,�.. , ",U! , - -, I - '! �, .. _ . � .4 i - . : . ,r - , .;i, .. i,,- -, �,-, 7!t?t�, _1'q-.tn--�, -,.r.- --,.-- r �. - _ - . - .4. "I .... - , '�, , - Z, ', , , 'r , ,_ , .Z, __,*,�. `i� . .1� - - I l� . � , - 14.,. 11 A ..1. - ., ,, _ik�� .1 I, _�� K , - I - � _l6 l__ - , ., : _., 25 .. � , , - � I I I .I _, -, I I - ., ._ , - �', ,� * - ,qi, , - 11 , 1111�!__ . I � , - " - - -� t, - -1 A __4 I, Zii ,� Lt� , `%�4�, `- _.". , . - . - , � I li�, ..�, iL � �u :� i . .k - � - - -, 11 -1. I ., ._e , I 11'1 I 1, -I -. j� _ I, .�%_ I �` 1� . - _,,� . , . , � .m �. , I I ;el `�- ' � . , . .;. . . " . , , I - -r A, ., 3� � 1. - _� � . � : . � 1, , -, . - - , ,, 11. I � 1 .�44�; "'V-,_'4' vi,� , , , I ,; -, � , - " . I tt-,' I'll -r4I-,� ;�- .,i,:.�;-.'��;�-�k,t,-, 'I, 44", � r ; lkl-`�-� - 't e ; . - I . �r ,� , . .. . � 't "i .- .4 _ r , :,. , . . , I , ; L I I . . , - I I -, " , � L, � r , .,.. - . , , �--.:;k�w , I�IZIVJ, :,; � . V , " , '. � I I - ,,. . , , , . ;-.;� " ". . - - '44. - . , !*,V, I - . , V, , ,.,�, -Z�,'�t,:7, _ -i � ., �,,, �%;�-,-.; . .,f.- " . 1 '-I-, , j,", I , � - � - 11 �_ - ;�, , , T, i- --- , . �. .- , r , , �,� -, '1_lt ;� . . I- � I , - -, .. . I I, � - - I I � . �, I , - - " ,i - -- - ---,- -;ef",�kll -j �.- 'vit-,, L,� , -_ .,�: : I � - I , - �, I � �_ � - -1 -1 ,. r ,� � , . . , " .",m �t .,ii". ,.fil - . . I - I .i - � I � ,, : -, 7 :: '. , - ." ., � - -Z - ,�i - '. r__rj4' __� 7�_ q_rt�_i�2t�'� -, '�"''_' ' -', ...... I,- I I'll - � - - , � . , - . �. 'e, .. � __ I _�, -1 . . I. ,., I .- , - , � "� z� �`� �.' i � 4; ��2'� I- .r _ " r , . ., - - - - I . . ,. - ,- - .�j . -, '-- �., _,� , ,. I I - : _� , I ��.,:, " - , -, . _. � - ,�. -I l I -Ir - �- -, , I ,_ Vi - ,'.� _ , , , � �, . � ". 1 --, , ; - � I -',, I � , ' I � - '_ in . -,� !� � 1i � . � . . . � - .:. I , _. � . ic'. -,, - '. , � . :- �L,�� , - I - ,4A., , I L� , ". , ,. _,'_ �'_' T - , " .. ,,-,,, - I ""P , - �.,, %-.. �, , . i , � .. .... ... �, ",� � ll� - i - " . . '. , I . .. . � , , � 'i 1., ir i - � I - . .. - '� ,�`i . " - . " , 1,4-', _ . - - . - . , ., , ..- , , - � � -. I - :v� - ,ii. - --,, 1.,�. ,i" 4 .4_l!f�e,6Ai_r1.lA.l; ! � . * .. " . , ., . . . . . 1 3 . 1 . .. � - I jr _-Irlk, � , I - �&111� v Matter � DennIll )6ting ca t Y I .i. , - I " , ir ( , �e " I " , - , ,., - r - . L� - , 'l'Ii . 4 �.?i - - - , . - , -4. � "', _i � - -�-t 71�y -�-�:_ ; - -.S % _. .�. . _ :, , �V_ .,�.11', __ , Y . _. , - - ... - L� _,i, 3k;:,� - _-t,i, . -, ,jILj;'�� ._-,L .." � ,_-, . , I , ...i. - ,4 1 , __ �; l -��- �; � � - . , � ,,- . ,..,, - .. �41- �l 1� � ..I'- , ...-;''T,r zitt -",%.,I, " v1- ":Z. -, '. -. ,,; � � _. �; -� - l4 ,- - , -, , a i I -- 11 � - iit�4$ _�,,,--�,-`--f� � - , _. ��, _. " . - �. � - � -- - �. i�.e� � l -V---1 p-�jfi�. , �-,-�,;����-t�,�,Z-,',,,,,P- - -.C.,_: , -', - , -,'��_. i k. �, �-:- 1,�.,- i, l�� .-I, .1 � '�' _,��t .- 4- , -- , � r � X�` � � ;, _'_,,,._�_,__11 `rG-:6R-"o"--4t� -,,./-.� -:, 1. �. I� _L �. � �. ,_ _ " . _ , �- I., !:!�.., - __ . . ,-...i-,, ;.�,1..-_1... 1, -11, 61 1l, . " 7�'11 , I I . - �,w - - " �i,., ') I , I,- , . , .._ � I � -._i, -Ill. 11-11 I _ .. " . 1, - A.. , , , . . I., , _ � , _�, ���_ .0, '.. :j- _. I I Iii `11 . .1"i i " , v, . . 4r __ I I , '1� � - 1�1-1.A� I.-." - �W, � . ri -.4, _, - I , I I - - i '� � -, '. �V-_. �,' , ' -; 4,,,,'. - --4'. - .�,,. "' I I. .', '._�.,i`, - , ---. '. I � . V-1 'r "',_ .. _ , , .;" I . ��,- ;��Q -, i- . - , , , � I -1 .I,- . - , - lit. _;i� ,4, 11 . I -, .., - 1. 1-1- _� � , ,_ -,iiii' - � . . I I . �, i I!t� ,J�., - ,�. ._ � . - '' 1, ]�, . ,,.-7,,,. 4 - , _g,,- I 1;1�., !��,--_ ,�".. ; " ,. -i I. �,e --i-1, ,i-� " . , , , ..-I., -, - ,I j �-j� . ,iir�'L��',X `;-�.�,-i, " � -� - ; --�, � - - , " " i , F,�,,,-,�f , I f 'i " r,,- , , _ - I— � _ 1;' , Z!i--, tV_i,�, - �1'11 � -, , t -- � . , - ?" .,,"� . , ,;. , " .. - . � I I I- I . - I -_� � ,-, ,, - I , L , , x -'i�2 711�1 , �". A� . . .. . . . - i I � , I I � _ i I , . i"i,.- , - , , �, .,- - -, , , . A . , I .. . . I W-� � , - , �� I - --itli . -*, ,� , .-, I , , - . .. - . 1i ,' ,,� - , - _ ,. � 1. . , . .1 I . .1 '-I- - , , - ., F '7 " " . 1. , 11�� 11-1-1 t tl ,•%,,*-j.,4 �' , Ij -:,��, , � , 3 .Z. , - 't � _. r. '. , t _jl�'�,4; �: , -, � .1�;t` - - V I �I - . . - ,~`-_ . �1 , . ., . ,� i, � _," - �__%- , , ,; � ii- .- I., �p, -1-14 �r� , . (U'.:��*z� ., i%;i ,i'l , , _'. I � �, _4 , _ . _ , . i I � . -. - I . , �, M - � - L - 'i-., -, ,� , , , '. . . NV '. " , I ,,,-�Y', , - . ,_ - _ , 1�q ,;,.z -�, ,: ,#Al�,�z-�,;"- ,.�. ,--' .1. � . I, �, _�, � - �'. - -1 -.k - _;,�- , - ." ,-'ilf .�. . . � - - . �,� ; , ,j , , �A. � _ - -, , � _ - -1 , � �:. . 1. �, �.fl. ; . '. �,�.�, --., � A,X t-,ti�'f_! - � ' A - � - ' , . I - , - -, . ,'S � , , r. - _t, ��, ," , I - , . , , - - . I --- , �� :�zi_ ,i�- � T� " , -- z A �,,� g ,'as -�-.,I� ' ,,' ' , _,l�t' , I _-z ,,.i--,�?". ,i,. .� -� -.�_ -, I . � I � . . . . . , - ; - - --- -.� . -,�, �,_11;i;�_ lio ;� . _'� .. - -1 �. � _.; - I � . - �., A. - �-"_, s11.�-:!_'-_ � _.!P01F� �,s;i��,�j-/&T.�,�; -, - ll�r� � , ,, 11 �- � W - _'W, r�`irl� . ,�_ ,'�1. "�, -1 � ;:- r x . , � I .1. *ie, -9--lVili '�% � � " 5�') �. ;1 I � �_Q,! il W,V-..; . ,,1 , ', I � I ., .1 , T_ � . '.. . � ;.1 Z'�, &, +,,;_ ,1W '!�y - -!.ivii�' - - - �- ---- k, , �, -i,A -, '.. 4. ;'�`.-,�-�-�V'�t'j�,-,, ,; ,_ z - , � � , , �I?i� , � , . - " � I r � �-.1,'. I " .-. .., , ._ -�- - . , - .,i+",�,,�. �: l, ,;Z , � �:� � - � ".-k �-, . I - , -Y - �' 4, �,� 1 - - .-" � -I�'' �, � 1. _ i- I ,�,:i-Z . A'-!--,, - 'it.i - VAI , , l,. , ,.� � , I I , " 4 _' - - ..-I ,. .1 ; .-,-- � - i,w__,,,` ,_ , e-. - , , � - - ., , , � ' ' Y.�. - r:i%t, :, �-� * r,�, �,, . "t -,- . r ,tiris,- ,:t,4kA$O ;AWI� 1� . ,� . �p ", , .1%,�11',it, � . . , �. , - . _,�4 - . � '& - " - , tL� __ __ � - ,,,,�- - --��.:,_- .I-- .- , , - . - -�w%� -,ii..."'. --, � ".1 _'. - , _. �Ti I _ ill Ll'. .. __ .1 . ; . * 1 ,� - -.YK .. - 1,�,L� _�e,� I- ICI; I � . r t A� ". -� N'Ii jtl�, � '�,,��- I _ b�-,V�IW,�O . x1t".1. �,,. �,,',n � r ,13. ,Z ." I �. .13 ,� � - _ DATE: January 10, 1975 TO: Planning and Zoning Commission Attn: Don Madsen, Chairman FROM: Iowa City City Council RE: Referral Ar their regular meeting on December 17, L974, the Iowa City Citv Council discussed the abandonment of the Lafayette Street Fridge. The motion was adopted that vacating that portion of Lafayette Street and/or abandoning the bridge be referred to Un Planning and Zoning Commission. i s r i 1 DATE: January 10, 1975 TO: Planning and Zoning Commission Attn: Don Madsen, Chairman FROM: Iowa City City Council RE: Referral Ar their regular meeting on December 17, L974, the Iowa City Citv Council discussed the abandonment of the Lafayette Street Fridge. The motion was adopted that vacating that portion of Lafayette Street and/or abandoning the bridge be referred to Un Planning and Zoning Commission. i s i i J ; i "J<I' h. -',i.. F i $T t alir ->r3 t.. 4 ! t L3-, ' " ' y. of -..3 IF t I" .AL.- i t 5 - i F l yf.:- 74 �+ Z2 fy�!�', ; V'.i # r- i'1 .n -r' . IL. - "t -t/ <,'' t _11 - t r t s .4! z{. i ��^s,, [ -s ''hri`'c.LC 'f( h�. �i r -Ni( ; t r .ti r { t', r S. y- ii. t 4Y .F - do 1 Ss_; 1 q.l c> 1_ V F q �. "7C r" -1, v *-z r P x t >F °r' a , '� t } >� "t.?'' :' ; � N '. `becsvber l6, ' 1974 t "' yT 4t..a >• a a_ry _ e " -e< a A� I b 7. +� ` � }^ �`i fi,.± v rr . •v g + ri k'I..1 �e +.1. t I' x R .1 2 , T> a 3 - t. .j ' t 4 s'� . L s s . Ake y _ Y � - + s o-%, t , — . { s 'T - zy _ ,f x e -..-y. RF i L�..� 'r- :` G'x '!FA; 4 T`e.> c -. ,�..- t• '�-' / 1' >s .. ,>. a z 1'T >�'i" r i r n `-.+y'' + 5 v ..`b t t ,w _ r w ' \ .];„ F-, .� > 5.! '.-� ' of .,i� ,,, �f > fE �4:r 1)`k \11 L - > _. S^ .� ' ' .F'k '- Sl S .r+5c{s.; >t� +-3',!'S.'Md`i � �' Bt's _'t' i ,yf "\ _ _ - t -+ �t� i r__ a - - .n c"k €� a31 -ts - r �: +.. +; Y > r 4 zs-:� < .r„lf� i '� -.t tis ti}f'. ^` ,*{ 2 -<!a t c ^` < r.-t.m 71\ r s 6 } sj'F` ! �i'iF,R Sh�t T t r 1 \ V _ r• _• v .Y .rctl`rr1.>a F» t-. i{,,�"a wz'"'-'" h,Ta".r ''i t ! .,t fk a _ ril.� M ioQ:mi s*{t-+,r tt ,�o% P: s`g- rt` a.` . \'�. Si.. �w t'i. r z, - t "� , //�� tfw-e�y..w� .,,u` 1 1• '..i.i� J s,T^y,. h �' �s a}Y` s ;- e� Ze.�t S ��.£ .i r f ' v i 4 r i .. 4V Y Wi{YL4 N JrY _ r `� * k1 '!4..R'' i' 4'i'r..'3'!a'r}' �A1` cT*?'.4-,-rY :' r t s r i0.►a Cite[ylOMai}52240 ;J `,£ I.� tA .3 k ,"t r .�.' u +' '} t t'��if Fy rya i^s t t i - a > ��.� ri,,,,,.. Y.. w l- r 9 P i'f rb'L' i ' a i-� '. i '' y < r _ ` - t t - -: YP� � Y�i1 Sr. ley� �?r ; � +< i3 �3' t �t,�, P9^, . y$'i �?Iiv'�t?ta'�`yi > v,', r 1. '°$ JT2a♦ CityConaail `+ t 1Csibcaee�tsir 17 F1974, Council uiesting - t , Baler .ad toys t+alayett�� �- r; W&C r, w p 'i fres i dgr ' Ctbo lanniaq and s ,zonlziOrVbmmisslbh fort C arc oons3deratia�i anda.reconwend1.atioa bade .tout SCtiuriCil: zits will I I yau'infosma Boa lurCher'dav©1 l -: yr -h r i, .c5a1 riffs f. G t, .rk:{ O -M s ,� -s. -ak. d y:, yr 4 y ognmsta�oauaazsttag ii�ii•, iii 4' 4' ti yuw.gF1 ".tr y t- _. a. '! a < s: as _'R 'r.. .�'- xvu -� 1 1• !-.£,"y' =f� �.. Sid ,.. 'Ft' -i h r c > '> i t' f1. c'^ p ti 2 i5,I. 'f' Ti Yi`v `'f '�'( i n{ . ''� _, t 4n ^\ f ' Y .. : - w- I!=lfiyot[` hBVN I'Miy4 q lwstidf1i *%jil"swt' SOC hesii'ats Co-ConCsot t T . GS, -F r'h F ': t t Y G i Y V 7> i S� 'tlt p d ry ^. t i _ \ 4- �. 1 h ! t 1 i --a ri it' i``iY DaIInis 'At1 •�ly C -: �', AI.oCing "'City-;littxiagai 3 -• { 4 t l' q -,b ��p y >y tr 5 /.. r r > :ti k-: F-Mil�i<t I �'"t � -, !" . '- � _' iT1 -va1.y rv, % - i:.. - Y •S 2 .t v^ F 3�f. 3 -i .A c n x 1t ,'ti z w'.. i III "tt 2i ti4, tr w:1..-.""'.- ,. -'r c r - f 4sI. n - ' �, £�.r t r r' r Y d W ) _ a- r ;"' r T , I Y y < vt 2 r i` - l ' a} , • t Y 1 �- y -. 1. t `-•f •!f x 1f I � _ `� F N i IJ i:.; =.-•> J.. t - Y -:mak - r b•¢ A Y. 2 - - h f 1 i s -1-1 t of y +1 I, x i t _ - :.A. ) 4: P t 4 y 1., t * R a 1 x - k e 11;.t'4 Z, - it I r" .era k, t5tix 'lrY 5�" u _ r+' _ - ZL. . I -: - . y I.< e !. �9bY..+-.1 > Iw o t i' ,: d +.th . t.Ye~+# b a - } e :.1 0 " k'frC+t 'r # - _ .f ii y t v. t T� Jlior � a - ,t.1i 1 - '% > J �Iw„� `I - i 4 n , t` s . tF -4 t - A- : t__ -r - 11 S .�" t -,..� '� --!- n $�• ti >'C ,T zf ,,t r\:. F..,v \+ t 5 f - b +..- .y �A. +' _.f. '� 3I t.'111"ft�r +- C;t'-..p ,' f �{ 1,d T Y .' �-..n i.. - t )I' _ - - s :fid a f b .t 2. } - bf 1 t,f-a y -L' � § �'et T�' i� ti `y/�4 d� i#y *� "f ti`afy fit- s a i- � ^t f _ _,i. - ,�Y' ,._t r.+.._ "T.\ > •.d'Ix,1 ! %.v .,ter .-4.a Y%. sl:,_t is _.:.Ysi 4i �ro'tYii. irYi�1. ., .�`:�. ,ns, x �'rt , - .... ;Tr.. ae _. �,'. J J` RESOLUTION OF APPROVAL OF CLASS C LIQUOR CONTROL LICENSE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF IOWA CITY, IOWA, that a Class C Liquor Control License application is hereby ap- proved for the following named person or persons at the following described location: Richard Corcoran dba/ The Shamrock, 515 South Gilbert Street Said approval shall be subject to any conditions or restrictions here- after imposed by ordinance or state law. The City Clerk shall cause a recommendation for approval to be endorsed upon the application and forward the same together with the license fee, certificate of financial responsibility, surety bond, sketch of the premises and all other information or documents required to the Iowa Beer and Liquor Control Department. It was moved by deProsse and seconded by White that the Resolution as read be adopted and upon roll call there were: Brandt Czarnecki Davidsen deProsse White Passed this AYES: NAYS 17th day of ABSENT: December .19 74 RESOLUTION NO. 74-544 RESOLUTION OF APPROVAL OF CLASS C LIQUOR CONTROL. LICENSE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF IOWA CITY, IOWA, that a Class C Liquor Control License application is hereby ap- proved for the following named person or persons at the following described location: Jerry Starbuck dba/Lazy Leopard Lounge, 122 Wright Street Said approval shall be subject to any conditions or restrictions here- after imposed by ordinance or state law. The City Clerk shall cause a recommendation for approval to be endorsed upon the application and forward the same together with the license fee, certificate of financial responsibility, surety bond, sketch of the premises and all other information or documents required to the Iowa Beer and Liquor Control Department. It was moved by deProsse and seconded by Davidsen that the i.esolution as read be adopted, and upon roll call there were: Brandt Czarnecki Davidsen deProsse White Passed this AYES: NAYS V4 17th day of ABSENT: December , 19 74 RESOLUTION' NO.. 74-545 RESOLUTION OF APPROVAL OF CLASS "C" BEER PERMIT APPLICATION BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF IOWA CITY, IOWA, that a Class "C" Beer Permit Application ,is hereby approved for the following named per- son or persons at the following described locations: Great Atlantic $ Pacific Tea Co. dba/A-Mart, 901 Hollywood said approval shall be subject to any conditions or restrictions hereafter imposed by ordinance or state law. The City Clerk shall cause a recommendation for approval to be endorsed upon the application and forward the same together with the license fee, surety bond and all other information or documents required to the Iowa Beer and Liquor Control Dppartment. it was moved by deProsse and seconded by Davidsen that the Resolution as read be adopted, and upon roll call there were: Brandt Czarnecki avi sen e rosse ilae AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: X X X X X Passed this 17th day of December , 19 747 ■ WHEREAS, Donnelly Is at 119 S. Dubuque in Iowa City, Iowa, has surrendered cigarette permit No 74-9 , expiring June 30 , 19 75 , and requests a refund on the unused portion thereof, now therefore, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF IOWA CITY, IOWA, that cigarette permit No. 74-9 , issued to Donnelly's be cancelled, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor and City Clerk be and they are hereby authorized and directed to draw a warrant on the General Fund in the amount of $ 50.00 , payable to Harold Donnelly, 423 Grant St., Iowa City as a refund on cigarette permit No. 74-9 It was moved by deProsse and seconded by Davidsen that the Resolution as read be adopted, and upon roll call there were: AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: Brandt X Czarnecki X Davidsen X deProsse X White X Passed this 17th day of December , 19 74 WHEREAS, XbMK Donnelly 's at 119 South Dubuque has surrendered beer permit No. C -370p expiring September 9. 1975 and requests a refund on the unused portion thereof, now therefore, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF IOWA CITY, IOWA, that said beer permit be and the same is hereby cancelled, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor and City Clerk be and they are hereby authorized and directed to draw a warrant on the General Fund in the amount of $ 633.75 payable to the Harold M. Donnelly dba/Donnelly's 119 South Dubuque for refund of beer permit No. C-3700 It was moved by deProsse and seconded by Davidsen that the Resolution as read be adopted, and upon roll call there were: AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: Brandt X Czarnecki X Davidsen X deProsse X White X Passed this 17th day of December 19�. a arc! DES MOINES REGIONAL OFFICE / P.O. Box 1848 11017 Walnut Street I Phone (515) 245-41411 Des Moines, Iowa 50306 Hayek, Hayek & Hayek, Attorneys 110 East Washington Street Iowa City, Iowa 52240 Attention: Dear John: John W. Hayek December 10, 1974 RE: Claim No. Insured: Claimant: D/L: 2-270669 City of Iowa City Lawrence R. Short 1-24-74 This will confirm our phone conversation of November 26th, regarding the two actions that have been submitted to us for review and possible defense. I refer specifically to the Civil Action, File No. 74-283-1 in the United States District Court, Southern District, Central Division and the other suit, Law No. 42541 in the District Court of Iowa for Johnson County. In both these cases we face very knotty coverage problems as I mentioned to you on the phone. Probably the first and most significant problem is that it is difficult to determine from the two actions exactly what should be used for date of loss. The notice and petitions referred to were just received in this office in November, 1974. Both cases seem to originate from a situation which began to develop in December of 1965. Because of the late notice and the multitude of other coverages problems which are involved we will accept these matters only under a strict reservation of rights, reserving all rights of this Company relative to the coverage for you in the matter. The intent of the agreement, of course, is to permit an impartial and full investigation relating to the said accident and the liability, if any, without incurring an admission of liability and to preserve without estoppel, waiver or forfeiture any of the rights to any of the parties hereto. To further complicate things, we call once again to your attention the fact that you are only to well aware of, that being that the law suit against the defendants in both instances are in excess of the applicable limits of the policies involved. I am sure under the circumstances that you will give consideration to employing council of your own choosing and this at your own expense, to protect your interest in the defense of these actions which are over and above the limits of protection afforded in your policy. The basic policy HCC9-03907, provides $100,000 property damage limits, both aggragate basis. . for $300,000 bodily injury limits and on an occurrence basis and both on an The ESP policy identified as ESP2-505285, provides for a $1,000,000 limit of 4�+Aua't41: ecNiH1Y Yi1�NIN Qi�Hq�hNlar L ■ -2- 12-10-74 liability per occurrence and also $1,000,000 limit of liability in the aggregate for each annual period with respects to products hazard and completed operations hazard, however. We are referring the files to the Whitfield, Musgrave, Selvy, Kelly and Eddy firm, here in Des Moines and to the porsonal-attention,of"Attorney Roger Witke. We are asking that this firm review the petition and then will be in touch with you as quickly as possible. Since you have filed an appearance in the action which is filed in Johnson County and further since you have asked, and have received, an extension in the case filed in Federal Court here -in Des Moines, we will not actively become engaged in defense of the case until we review the coverage situation. Rest assured we will handle this with dispatch and do appreciate your cooper- ation to date. Should any questions arise, or any other problems are encount- ered which we are not aware of at this time, I would appreciate hearing from you, preferrably by telephone. `. Very truly yours, 'n' C ; Morgan ------ Don- Morgan Regional Claims Manage --r DM:dw cc to HO cc to Roger Witke 1 cc to Russ Mishak Agency F Q L� in] DEC 1 3 :974 ABBIE STOLFUS CITY CLERK STATE OF IONVA OFFICE OF AUDITOR OF STATE Des Nfoines LLOYD R- SMITH •-:.To2 of srATE December 17, 1974 Ms. Abbie Stolfus City Clerk 410 East Washington Iowa City, Iowa 52240 Dear Tis. Stolfus: Enclosed please find the schedule of the audit of your County, for the year ending December 31, 1973, which shows the amount of property tax paid to the various cities and towns of your County. The complete audit is on file in the Court House and are public records. If you have any questions or problems concerning audits or city government, please feel free to contact this office, as we have a motto to assist as well as audit. I will be happy t House. LRS:cc Enc. Cities and Tourns Coralvi ile T_o;aa City Lone Tree North liberty Oxford Solon Sw=sizer Tiffin Gniversity Heights S"nueyvil le Total Corpora--ion_Funds Receipts and Disbursements - 1973 Treasurer's balance Jan .'.. 1973 $ 6,206.04 31.97 Current and delinquent taxes 549,294.23 22,167.89 Orders paid to Corporations 540,205.50 21,774.65 Balance due Corporations Dec 31, 1973 15,294.77 425.21 63,007.19 3,154,098.80 3,1762644.59 40,461.40 242.26 776.84 422.75 113.51 62.21 4S1.90 1,762.47 357.53 $ 73,404.67 103 - 36,540.50 44, 155.52 23,234.54 44,257.42 23,829.11 11,519.08 81,052.23 36,380.20 43,860.24 28,067.71 43,062.02 23,191.09 1.1,425.63 81,940.04 2.656.03 22884.54 3,9972805.35 4,009,436.21 402.56 1,012.12 589.58 1,308.91 700.23 575.35 874.66 129 .02 61,77;.81 `xs4Y '-K1-asSp 7 y ,za krti-.�^>c`�� `a� ! ?t �� "n 5 i n �_� Fr 5 't� i.,�'. _~INFORMAL DB USSIOIJ DECEMBER 16, 1974 T 4:00, P,M, _ The Iowa City City Counci met in informal session on_ the;`16th''day lof December'; -.1974'i,.--inthe Conference;Room at` the °Civic Center. :Mayor; Pro tem' Davidsen presiding. Councilmembers present` Davidsen, dePr'osse, Brandt,- White, _:;Czarnecki, (4 25) . L Staff.; resent Hayek'; Kraft, P Stolfus, Pugh, Wollmershauser, Z:elenka, Neppl. Mayor Pro tem Davidsen commented-- that the .:Council was ,ind(bted toY,the Housin-gCommission for'their.in-depth analysis of the 'proposals r.eceiv.,ed for `the housing- pro- ject. She advised of4receipt of: Chairman ;of, the Design Review ;Comm ttee Tom Wegmans ,letter; and `_the-i letter from City AttorneytHayek concerning evsaluation'of Section 23 Housing Proposals, asdiscussed;wa.th HUD Des. Moines offi- .cials:"Mayor, Czarnecki% arrived. , - Yom. i T Mayor'Czarnekci'noted that the Council would now . consider the evaluation of -the 'selection`factors:as voted by theHousrig Commission "and by the; Staff, inthe follow- ing categories Site; Des gn and'Quality-of Cons,r:uc tion, :Gross-Rents, Credentals,of Developer, Builder and/ or .Owner, ands Other.4 During discussion •of Design & -Quality of Construction, these, points were-'discussed ``1).,,approp- _ riate time for negotiations;' 2), justification° needed if lowest-=.gross rent not^�accepted, 3) 'Type 5-vs :Type `1 con struction, '4)x developers co�ipliance with ;handbooks and codes ;applicable -'in Iowa City,>>5) observation made. that if the ,amount _'of money 'ckianges, the= scope of the project changes; and 6)accomodations for the handicapped. v In regard to Gross Rents, the following items were discussed: 1) ,Knutson`proposalfinancial:feasbility, 1ow`on`management.an d}ftaxes, 2);5square foot costs.as est- imated by •Housing Co --ordinator 3k Knutson, _ $15 21 ; Old Capitol`, $28.00; and':Midwest, $22.00 ;, Fredirie Branson, Chdirperson pz the°:Housing Commission noted dri her summary, -that' she{ wishe&� all athree-proposals. could be 'bu_lt; ;and .,asked ;those-snot chosen tb, stay inter- 4 { ested =_in housing in Slowa City` ; 7Mayor Czarnecki '.left the meeting;-Mayor Pro tem; Davidsen-pre siding Acting; City; Manager Dennis Kraft commented that the, Staff; after, evaluating the s3'.te; building and, viability of ;the program,+ recommended the' Old ;Capitol Associates Y proposal. ft -ry S" T J{'vt te. K 34)k.S S t. i.�.+�i�.. r� zb �3i'O. `r<s.f "+°w.�4e''.`ssrl!_. yj?"e1 l t _ v s Council Discussion December 16,, 1974 on'of nixing.subsidized and oman deProsse,questioned ntati.vely accept:two pro-_ y__Hayek noted that he would d 6.50 'PM.: - f t. . J s .rjr. 1 t fi i a z h INFORMAL DISCUSSION , DECEMBER 17, 1974 ' 4:OOl P,M, itylCity Council met in informal session of December, 1974:,in"the Conference Room rater. Mayorr'.Czarnecki.presiding, bees present were: Czarnecki, David sen t,YWhite` (4.35 PM.) Staff_members present ayek, Stolfus, Pugh, fSeydel Wollmershauser, ` - f aecki announced discussion of ;T) Design tdeferred)acquisition,,of Park.Land; y's report, `some portion of discussion to session; plus discussion of,-the-City:Manager i S _ added further, discussion of the ,:procedure_'on for vote in regular session,.and announced A.M. meeting to discuss replacement of Concerning the Public Forum on the 7th, -he eto ten, minutes wouldsbe allowed for.'the -. each candidate for councilmember_; 'He rold BechtoldtYhad removed his name -from the ._. tes and =pointed diit that only the: Council-° uetion;candidates, there would ;be no.;::public is. he,recept of; memo from Susan Sheets' from nisaionLwas noted4;als6-4 the ` 2013 Form; as )fin,Hayek pre ented his memo on the question two Seotiori 23tHousng proposal's; noting: consider.; a� re_quest,r`forj ;additional 'time, lecaion process is :a Council responsibility. included:, f -financial feasibility of pro- teriia financing anal future financing dis- ce• Directors `Joe Pugh. ;Housing.=Co-ordinator ained the Annual Contibutions Contract, :and differencebetweenrthe subsidized por- ntal payment`s-is what provides for rent he ;next year;; He ':added that rent rates can every yearosts go ,,up, the utliority and `;HUD 'justify the increase: ad son and }Muscatine project rebids -were cirrent cons`truction�costs: Mr ca Bowersox. laved that their`Constructon costs -,would' l Page',"2 management ,ho, ..Councilmembers ..proposal...-at_t]i timetable, exp compliance * e�; witAd 4- esg - tors, WA e out` t a: ec --Acting City i -Ma - '-statement,,* s e nto , ad j d'ur'n acquisition ui'sition'.'-Of and -City Attor :Davidsen ',.deer Council,Discussion. .:December 17,1974 per -square fobt' and outlined the it low-proposal::.,Several?;mm--,persons commented ed and n o fi s u b s 1 d i zikd'=h i e' h ta 1 s. ba'v:*L's'"LA'n-�.'.called ,'.;ai-ttehti6n _to,the Scan- c6nsiddrciti6ii,'6fatmosphere and at "'th .e,.�squaref.,dotage of ':rooms. Three that .ted--�thatheY� ay --to vote on the rmaLtme'e_tI:n'_gj'. 'z,---,':�=C6nc'_ drhl� over bld Capitol's tldniko' -'-'deletion''of:--_EEOC.;:I -Formr.. ,-5�cjrant',.-'for!: :`sculpture ure si PA -proce ures, t site,. :r public facilities;:, floor eleva- gs items then discussed: 'were d thd t each j cii- 4Co p un , c ilmember-.,would fill r eachturn it in to. the _F 2,, moved by by David�- e x e c u t i v s 6 9 s ib h f o r discussion of. _' k,'propertyj-4.,.�-seiec ion - of -a, -City -Manager - review.,----: Upon;';,,1rol1"--cAl1'. Brandt, Czarnecki., and voted ,'�-� .-Ave �Motion carried. n .0 7 F. 6-i CITY ASSESSI•H-INT EXPENSE FUND 1974 1975 -1st Half Total 18 mo's 1975-76 City Assessor 189990 99495 28,485 202000 Deputy Assessor 159200 7,600 22,800 16,110 1st Assistant 13,600 6,800 201400 14,400 2nd Assistant 13,600 61800 20,400 14,400 Clerk 12,400 69200 18,600 139900 Extra Help 4,000 2.000 6,000 4,000 Total Salaries 77 7Q AR ROG ,,c 5:2 1- ,.,,. Office Expenditures Supplies 1,500 500 2,000 29500 Board of Review 39000 39000 6,000 3,600 Car Allowance 500 200 700 500 Exam Board 50 25 75 60 Assessor's School 12000 400 1,400 17200 Court Costs 1,500 500 21000 39600 Telephone 19000 500 19500 19100 Group Life Insurance 29000 19000 39000 2,400 Blue Cross 1,200 600 1 800 2 400, Total 11,750 6.725 18,475 17,360 Total Budget 89,540 459620 1359160 1009270 'stimated Balance 6 000 5 000 Raised $y Taxation 129,160 95j270 Social Security 41800 21400 71200 61000 IPERS 4,000 2.000 6,000 4,500 Total: Social Security & IPERS 8,800 4,400 13,200 10,500 Tort Liability 19000 500 1,500 1,000 Total Budget 999340 50,520 1499860 1119770 Estimated Balance 6,000 5,000 Raised By Taxation 143,860 106,770 CITY ASSESSOR'S SPECIAL APPRAISAL FUND i 1974 1975 -1st Half Total 18 mo's 1975-76 Salaries & Extra Help Supplies & Commercial Appraisers 60,000 10,000 Total 60,000 10,000 �,`stimated Balance 25,000 10 000 Raised By Taxation 35,000 None Grand Total Of Budget 209,860 121,770 Estimated Balance 31,000 159000 Raised By 'Taxation 1782860 106,770 i TO: City Council of Iowa City FROM: John Hayek, City Attorney RE: Section 23 Housing Proposals DUM DATE: December 17, 1974 Upon the request of a member of the Council made at our meeting of December 16, 1974, I visited with Mr. Nate Ruben and Mr. Bill Van Vleet of HUD's Des Moines office about certain questions that arose at yesterday's meeting about the Section 23 proposals, These officials were most helpful in their responses to the questions asked. The first question was whether or not we could forward more than one proposal to HUD for review concurrently with our own review in order to secure additional time to evaluate proposals, Mr. Ruben and Mr. Van Vleet expressed considerable reluctance to have that procedure followed. Principally, I believe their reluctance was based upon a desire not to have cities and towns in Iowa flood the HUD office with multiple applications for review. Also, the officials indicated it was HUD's desire in this particular program to keep federal involvement to a minimum in the selection process. They emphasized the necessity for the city itself to make the selection. I indicated that we felt considerable time pressure in properly reviewing the three proposals that we had received. Mr. Ruben and Mr. Van Vleet indicated that they would be willing to be flexible on extending the submission deadlines if that would assist us in our review process. They suggested that if we need additional time, we should send them a letter requesting such additional time and implied that the request would be given favorable consideration. I also visited with them about the stance of HUD with respect to negotiating with developers after a tentative selection has been made. They indicated that they could see the need for negotiating with developers and recognized that regardless of which developer is selected a certain amount of adjustment prior to entering into the rental agreement will be necessary. However, they also pointed out that negotiations which substantially alter the proposal to the extent that it could be considered to giving unfair advan- tage to one developer over another would not be proper. Although these proposals are not submitted as competitive bids as such, we should be 7 City Council of Iowa City - 2 -- sensitive -sensitive to that issue especially in light of the language of the HUD regulations cited in a previous memorandum to you. onHae JWH:vb cc: Mr. Dennis Kraft Mr. Lyle Seydel Members of Iowa City Housing Commission Mr. Nate Ruben ■ Kel FROM: DATE: December 13, 1974 Fredine Branson, Chairperson, Iowa City Housing Commission John Hayek, City Attorney RE: Section 23, Housing Assistance Payments Program This memorandum is to confirm the content of our telephone conversation of December 13, 1974, reference questions that have arisen over the proposals submitted to the City for the Section 23 Housing Program. Specifically, you asked the question as to air conditioning of the units proposed by.the Knutson Company. It is my understanding that the Knutson proposal does not include air conditioning for the apartment units themselves. You also asked whether or not Old Capitol Associates could revise the floor plan of their apartment units. I indicated to you that in my opinion HUD regulations require that the City consider and evaluate the proposals as submitted without alteration of any substance. Paragraph 2-11(b) of the HUD Section 23 Handbook (7431. 1) states, "For purposes of determination of acceptability, no changes in proposals shall be considered after the deadline date for receipt of proposals, except that the LHA may request clarification of individual items or additional information which does not alter the scope of the proposal. " Because of this regulation I believe that the City should evaluate the proposals as they actually were submitted. I understand .that Knutson has given the Commission a letter in writing indicating a willingness to supply air conditioning and also that Old Capitol has indicated a willingness to revise their floor plans. While certainly the willingness of the developers to remain flexible and provide needed facilities is laudable, it does seem to me that the official evaluation should take place on the basis of the actual proposals as already submitted. It may be that HUD would permit some further negotiation with a developer after that developer's proposal has been tentatively approved and accepted by the City and by HUD. The extent of our freedom to operate in that area would depend on HUD. o n ye JWH:vb cc: Members of the City Council Lyle Seydel, Housing Coordinator IF L E DEC 1 3 174 ABBIE STOLFUzz), CITY CLERK