Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout06-19-1993 Airport Commission Meeting Minutes Work Session IOWA CITY AIRPORT COMMISSION WORK SESSION-AIRPORT RELOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY IOWA CITY TRANSIT FACILITY JUNE 19, 1993 - 11:40 A.M. MEMBERS PRESENT: John Ockenfels, Robert Hicks, Pat Foster, Richard Blum, Howard Horan STAFF PRESENT: Anne Burnside, Ron O'Neil Ockenfels opened the meeting by explaining that the objective of the session was to discuss, as a group, the information received concerning the Airport Relocation Feasibility Study. Although the Commission has discussed several individual issues, there has not been a general discussion on the entire study. The first item of discussion was the need of the community for an airport. Hicks stated that his contacts with business community leaders indicate a very strong need for an airport in the Iowa City area. Ockenfels added that although it is called the Iowa City Municipal Airport, the airport serves a large area in southeast and east central Iowa. Blum stated that there is a large information gap between the general public and those who utilize and need the Airport. Many of the general public who are serviced by the Airport have no idea they have secondary ties to the Airport. Blum said that the FAA and the IDOT have gone on record as supporting the need for an airport in Iowa City. There was considerable discussion on the costs of maintaining an airport and where the financing will and should come from. What course of action is best or perhaps cheapest for the community ? The amount that goes into the FAA AIP fund for general aviation airports by Iowa City area travelers using the Cedar Rapids Airport can be conservatively estimated at $ 350, 000. 00 per year. This is a fee assessed on each commercial ticket sold. This is money that will be spent on general aviation airports, not necessarily airports in Iowa. If Iowa City does not apply for the money, it will be spent on general aviation airports elsewhere. Burnside suggested that the Commission should concentrate on one option at a time, discussing all the positive and negative factors. After complete discussion of the option, the Commission would move on to another alternative. The Commission agreed that the only practical option for remaining at the present site is Option 1. This would not change the lay-out of the Airport. Costs would include some land acquisition and relocation, plus several million dollars for capital improvements. Total cost of the option is estimated at $ 11, 000, 000. 00. This would also mean reducing the utility of the Airport to A and B category aircraft only. There are additional items not included in the $ 11 million dollars that are not eligible for FAA AIP. The cost of these items was estimated by H. R. Green Co. to be about $ 2 million dollars. This would include ADA improvements to the Terminal Building, pavement between the T-hangars, a new roof on the Terminal Building and several other projects. Blum stated the amount estimated for land acquisition may be too low, based on past easement appraisals. Easement appraisals for the 17/35 Runway Rehab Project were more than the amount allocated for easements and construction. That is why the FAA gave Iowa City a temporary waiver on buying easements. The Commission listed advantages and disadvantages of option 1 at the current site. Advantages 1. Proximity and convenience. 2. Layout - three runways. 3. Politically acceptable. 4. Would open up public and private development possibilities for Iowa City. Disadvantages 1. Site can never achieve all FAA approach safety standards. 2 . Restricts commercial development. 3. Declining physical facilities. 4 . Geography limits improvements. (example-no ability to site ILS) 5. Proximity to commercial and residential encroachment. 6. Restricted aviation growth. 7. Restricts contiguous city growth. Promotes urban sprawl. 8. Airport zoning lawsuits are a potential financial liability. 9. Reduction to A and B category aircraft. 10. Impact on those in potential land acquisition and easement areas. 11. Potential for negative noise impact.