HomeMy WebLinkAbout1979-06-12 OrdinanceORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A USER CHARGE SYSTEM IN THE CITY OF IOWA
CITY, COUNTY OF JOHNSON, STATE OF IOWA, TO PROVIDE FUNDS NEEDED TO
PAY FOR ALL EXPENSES ASSOCIATED WITH THE CITY'S WASTEWATER
TREATMENT WORKS.
WHEREAS, the City of Iowa City, Iowa, has constructed wastewater
treatment works; and
WHEREAS, the City must pay all expenses associated with said
treatment works and charge the users of said treatment works
accordingly;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE City Council of the City of
Iowa City, Iowa, that the following user charge system be
established:
ARTICLE I
It is determined and declared to be necessary and conducive to the
I welfare and convenience of
the City to collect health,
users who contribute wastewater
I to the City's treatment works. The proceeds of such charges so
derived will be used for the purpose of operating, maintaining and
j
retiring the debt for such public wastewater treatment works.
ARTICLE II
Unless the context specifically indicates otherwise, the meaning of
terms used in this ordinance shall be as follows:
Section 1: "BOD" (denoting Biochemical Oxygen Demand) shall mean
the quantity of oxygen utilized in the biochemical oxidation of
i
organic matter under standard laboratory procedure in five (5) days
at 20'C, expressed in milligrams per liter (mg/1).
i Section 2: "Normal Domestic Wastewater" shall mean wastewater that
has a BOD concentration of not more than
solids concentration of not more than m9/1; a suspended
i of to mg l ; a Ph in the range
not more than mg 11 of petroleum oil, non -
biodegradable cutting oils or products of mineral oil; and not
exceeding_ mg/l of oil or grease of animal or vegetable origin.
i
Section 3: "Operation and Maintenance" shall mean all expenditures
dur ng the useful life of the treatment works for materials, labor,
utilities, and other items which are necessary for managing and
maintaining the treatment works to achieve the capacity and
performance for which such works were designed and constructed.
1196
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES
ORDINANCE NO.,!"")
PAGE 2
Section 4: "Replacement" shall mean expenditures for obtaining and
installing equipment, accessories, or appurtenances which are
necessary during the useful life of the treatment works to maintain
the capacity and performance for which such works were designed and
constructed. The term "operation and maintenance" includes
replacement.
Section 5: "Residential Contributor" shall mean any contributor to
the City s treatment works whose lot, parcel of real estate, or
building is used for domestic dwelling purposes only.
Section 6: "Shall" is mandatory; "May" is permissive.
Section 7: "SS" (denoting Suspended Solids) shall mean solids that
either float on the surface of or are in suspension in water,
sewage, or other liquids and which are removable by laboratory
filtering.
Section 8: "Treatment Works" shall mean any devices and systems for
the storage, treatment, recycling, and reclamation of municipal
sewage, domestic sewage, or liquid industrial wastes. These
include intercepting sewers, outfall sewers, sewage collection
systems, individual systems, pumping, power, and other equipment
and their appurtenances; extension improvements, remodeling,
additions and alterations thereof; elements essential to provide a
reliable recycled supply such as standby treatment units and clear
well facilities; and any works, including site acquisition of the
land that will be an integral part of the treatment process or is
used for ultimate disposal of residues resulting from such
treatment (including land for composting sludge, temporary storage
of such compost, and land used for the storage of treated wastewater
in land treatment systems before land application); or any other
method or system for preventing, abating, reducing, storing,
treating, separating, or disposing of municipal waste or industrial
waste, including waste in combined storm water and sanitary sewer
systems.
Section 9: "Useful Life" shall mean the estimated period during
which a treatment works will be operated.
Section 10: "User Charge" shall mean that portion of the total
wastewater service charge which is levied in a proportional and
adequate manner for the cost of operation, maintenance, and
replacement of the treatment works.
Section 11: "Water Meter" shall mean a water volume measuring and
recording device, furnished and installed by the City of Iowa City.
ARTICLE III
Section 1: The user charge system shall generate adequate annual
revenues to pay costs of annual operation and maintenance including
replacement and payment of principal and interest and the bond and
interest reserve fund. The portion of the total user charge which
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 1101REs
ORDINANCE NO. ' 1
PAGE 3
is designated for operation and maintenance including replacement
of the treatment works shall be established by ordinance.
Section 2:
Revenues into Special Fund. The revenues of the Municipal
Sewage Disposal Works and Facilities are to be set aside as
received into a separate special fund and paid each month into
the various separate funds created by the bond ordinance. Such
payments are to be made on the first day of each month in the
amounts and in the order listed herein.
Operation and Maintenance Fund. There shall be paid into this
fund an amount which with any unexpended balance therein is
sufficient to pay the expenses of operating and maintaining
said works and facilities for the current month. After said
first day of the month further payments may be made into said
fund from the "Sewer Revenue Fund," but only if and to the
extent necessary to pay such operation and maintenance
expenses actually accrued and payable and to the extent that
funds for such purpose are not then available. This fund will
be budgeted annually by the City Council.
' Sewer Revenue Bond Sinking Fund. Next, there shall be set
aside from the net earnings a sufficient portion to pay the
I interest on and principal of all of the bonds outstanding as
the same become due and for that purpose the ordinance provides
that there shall be set aside into the Sinking Fund on the
first day of each month a sum equal to 1/10 of the principal of
all bonds maturing on the next succeeding January 1 and 1/5 of
the interest due on the next succeeding interest payment date
` until the amounts so set aside are equal to such principal and
interest, respectively. The Sinking Fund is to be used only
for the purpose of paying interest and principal on the bonds
of this issue and any parity bonds, and if in any month the
full amount is not paid, then the deficiency shall be made up
from the net earnings next available.
Bond and Interest Reserve Fund. After the monthly payments
into the Sinking Fund, there shall be next set aside into this
fund from the net earnings the sum of $1,000 on the first day
of each month as long as any of the bonds are outstanding.
Money credited to the Reserve Fund shall be used only for the
Payment of principal of and interest on the bonds and parity
bonds whenever for any reason the funds on deposit in the
Sinking Fund are insufficient to pay such principal or
interest when due. It is further provided that at any time
there is an excess in the Reserve Fund over and above the
maximum amount of principal and interest to become due in any
fiscal year thereafter on the outstanding bonds and parity
bonds such excess may be used to purchase or call any of the
then outstanding bonds at not exceeding par and accrued
interest, or may be transferred by the City Council to the
Depreciation, Extension and Improvement Fund.
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MORTES
ORDINANCE NO.
PAGE 4
Depreciation, Extension and Improvement Fund. After making
the foregoing payments, from the balance of the net earnings
there shall be paid into this fund the sum of $2,000 each
month, or such higher amounts as the City Council may fix from
time to time. Monies in this fund shall be used only to pay
any extraordinary costs of maintaining sewage works and
facilities and to pay the cost of constructing improvements
and extensions. In any event, the monies on deposit in the
Depreciation Fund must be transferred to the Sinking Fund
whenever necessary to prevent or remedy any default in the
payment of interest on or principal of these bonds or parity
bonds, and must be transferred to the Reserve Fund whenever
there is any deficiency in that fund.
Surplus Funds. Any excess after foregoing payments in any year
i may be used within the system or for any purpose lawfully
directed by the City Council.
ARTICLE IV
Section 1: Each user shall pay for the services provided by the
City based on his/her use of the treatment works as determined by
water meter(s) acceptable to the City.
Section 2: User charges shall be based on actual water used during
the current month. If actual water use is not available, the user
' charge will be based on prior monthly water usage.
If a commercial or industrial contributor has a consumptive use of
water, or in some other manner uses water which is not returned to
the wastewater collection system, the user charge for that
contributor may be based on a wastewater meter(s) or separate water
meter(s) installed and maintained at the contributor's expense, and
in a manner acceptable to the City.
Section 3: The minimum charge per month shall be $In
addition, each contributor shall pay a user charge rate for
operation and maintenance including replacement of $ per
100 cubic feet of water (or wastewater) as determined in the
preceding section and an additional $ per 100 cubic feet
of water (or wastewater) for debt retirement.
Section 4: For those contributors who contribute wastewater, the
strength of which is greater than normal domestic sewage, a
surcharge in addition to the normal user charge will be collected.
The surcharge for operation and maintenance including replacement
is:
$ per pound B00
$ per pound SS
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 140111ES
ORDINANCE NO. '
PAGE 5
per pound Other Pollutant(s) (Specify)
Section 5: Any user which discharges any toxic pollutants which
cause an increase in the cost of managing the effluent or the sludge
from the City's treatment works, or any user which discharges any
substance which singly or by interaction with other substances
causes maintenance, or preplacemenable t ases �
of thetrea mentn the cworks ost �shallepay �for
such increased costs. The charge to each such user shall be as
determined by the Director of Public Works and approved by the City
Council by resolution.
Section 6: The user charge rates established in this article apply
T_—_
o all users, regardless of their location, of the City's treatment
works.
Section 7: Water not discharged into system. If any user of water
consumes water for any purpose which does not cause discharge into
the sanitary sewer system, and if approved by the City and as
established by a separate water meter installed and maintained by
such user, the consumption of such water can be determined, no
charge shall be made on the basis of water so supplied. Residential
contributors shall not be allowed this option.
Section 8: Water discharged into system from private source. If
any person shall discharge water into the city sanitary sewer system
from private wells or other sources other than the city water
system, the city shall have the right to install a meter at the
owner's expense to measure such flow or to use whatever means are
satisfactory to the owner and the city to measure such flow for the
purpose of determining sewage treatment charges.
Section 1: All users shall
particular period shall be
that period. Payments are
payment not received withi
shall be delinquent.
ARTICLE V
be billed bi-monthly. Billings for any
made within thirty days after the end of
due when the billings are made. Any
I thirty days after the billing is made
Section 2: In the event that a user fails to pay his bill for
sewage treatment system service beyond such user's second regular
billing period, such charges may be certified by the City Council
and assessed against the property connected with the sewage
disposal system and forwarded to the County Auditor for collection
in the same manner as a property tax.
ARTICLE VI
Section 1: The City shall review the user charge
years and revise user charge rates as necessary to
system generates adequate revenues to pay the costs
maintenance including replacement, payment of
interest and the bond and interest reserve fund, an
dsystem every two
ensure that the
of operation and
principal and
that the system
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES
ORDINANCE NO.
PAGE 6
continues to provide for the proportional distribution of operation
and maintenance including replacement costs among users and user
classes. Before any ordinance is enacted to fix rates to be charged
under this division, a public hearing on the proposed change shall
be held by the City Council.
Section 2: The City will notify each user at least annually, in
conjunction with a regular bill, of the rate being charged for
operation, maintenance including replacement of the treatment
works.
ARTICLE VII
Section 9.60.3 of the Municipal Code and all other Ordinances or
parts of Ordinances in conflict with this Ordinance, are hereby
repealed.
ARTICLE VIII
If any section, provision or part of the Ordinance shall be adjudged
to be invalid or unconstitutional, such adjudication shall not
affect the validity of the Ordinance as a whole or any section,
Provision or part thereof not adjudged invalid or unconstitutional.
I
ARTICLE IX
This Ordinance shall be in effect after its final passage, approval
and publication as required by law.
It was moved by and seconded by
that the Ordinance as read be finally adopted and
Upon roll call there were:
AYES: NAYS: ABSENT:
— BALMER
dePROSSE
EROAHL
NEUHAUSER
PERRET
-- ROBERTS
— VEVERA
First consideration
Vote for passage:
Second consideration
Vote for passage:
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 1101NES
ORDINANCE NO. �.
PAGE 7
Date of Publication
Passed and approved this
day of
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS•DF.S 110114ES
1979.
I
APPENDIX "A" TO USER CHARGE ORDINANCE
This appendix presents the methodology to be used in calculating
user charge rates and surcharges and illustrates the calculations
followed in arriving at the first year's user charges and
surcharges. The unit costs established in this appendix are based
on estimates of expenses and loadings. The actual expenses and
loadings that occur may differ from these estimates and certainly
they will change as time passes. Therefore, the unit costs must be
reestablished whenever necessary to reflect actual expenses and
loadings. Once the system is in use, the expenses and loadings can
be determined from operating records and the unit costs can be
adjusted based on these figures.
1. Expenses: The total annual expenses associated with the
treatment works, as defined in Article II, Section 8, are
estimated as follows:
Item
Billing and Collection
Annual Expense
Administrative
Power
Labor (including fringe benefits)
Commodities
Services and Charges
Replacement Costs
I Debt Service
TOTAL
2. Allocation of Expenses: The total operation and maintenance
including replacement expense is allocated to the appropriate
i
pollutants in the following manner.
Annual $ to Treat Annual Flow = % annual cost allocated to flow x
I (total annual 0&M budget minus
billing & collection)
Annual $ to Treat Annual BOD = % annual cost allocated to BOD x
(total annual O&M budget minus
I
billing & collection)
Annual $ to Treat Annual SS = % annual cost allocated to SS x
(total annual O&M budget minus
billing & collection)
Annual $ to Treat Annual
iOther Pollutant = % annual cost allocated to pollu-
tant x (total annual O&M budget
I
minus billing & collection)
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOVIES
2
3. Loadings:
I The initial hydraulic loading is estimated to be _
gal/year.
IJ The initial BOD loading is estimated to be _ pounds/year.
i
j The initial SS loading is estimated to be _ pounds/year.
The initial other pollutant loadings is estimated to be
pounds/year.
4. Unit costs:
Initial unit cost for flow in $/cu. ft. = annual $ to treat annual flow
Estimated annual hydraulic loading
Initial unit cost for BOD in $/pound = annual $ to treat annual BOD
Estimated annual BOD loading
Initial unit cost for SS in $/pound = annual $ to treat annual SS
Estimated annual SS loading
i Initial unit cost for other.= annual $ to treat other annual pollutants
pollutants in $/pound Estimated annual other pollutant loading
The unit costs for BOD, SS and Other Pollutants are to be inserted
in Article IV, Section 4, of the ordinance.
' 5. Minimum Charge:
Debt Service = $
j Annual billing and collection cost = $
Annual cost to treat infiltration/inflow
(assumed clear water) = unit cost to
treat flow x annual infiltration/inflow = $
TOTAL Annual Minimum Cost = $
Minimum Charge/User/Billing Period = $
This minimum charge/user/billing period is to be inserted in
Article IV, Section 3, of the ordinance.
6. Residential User Unit Charge: The residential user unit
charge is calculated as follows using the pollutant
concentrations defining normal domestic wastewater in Article
II, Section 2, of this ordinance.
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RA MS•OCS MOIRES
3
Residential unit charge = unit flow charge
+ (unit BOD charge)(BODND)(.0834)
+ (unit SS charge)(SSNO)(.0834)
where: Residential unit charge is in $/100 C.F.
Unit flow charge is in $/100 C.F. from paragraph 4
Unit BOD charge is in $/lb BOD from paragraph 4
Unit SS charge is in $/lb SS from paragraph 4
BOD is the normal domestic 800 strength in milligrams
PUP liter (mg/1) as defined in Article II, Section 2, j
of the ordinance
,
SS is the normal domestic SS strength in mg/1 as defined
�R Article II, Section 2, of the ordinance
and .0834 is a unit conversion factor.
j
This total residential unit charge is to be inserted in Article IV,
Section 3, of the ordinance.
An example calculation of a residential charge for a resident of the
City of Iowa City follows:
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOINES
,.,11 4
7. Extra Strength Users: For users who contribute wastewater
that has greater strength than normal domestic wastewater, the
user charge will be calculated as follows:
Total monthly charge to extra strength user =
charge to residential user + surcharge for BOD (if
appropriate) + surcharge for SS (if appropriate) +
surcharge for other pollutant (if appropriate).
Total monthly charge to extra strength user =
minimum charge
+v(residential unit charge)
+v(unit 800 charge)(BODES - SODND)(.0834)
+v(unit SS charge)(SSES - SSND)(.0834)
+ and so on for any other appropriate pollutant(s)*
*Users discharging outside the Normal Domestic strengths for
Ph, grease, and oils will have extra strength charges computed
in the manner prescribed in Article IV, Section 5.
where: Total monthly charge to extra strength user is in
dollars
Minimum charge is in dollars as calculated in paragraph 5
v is the volume of wastewater in 100 cubic feet discharged
by the extra strength user during the month
Residential unit charge is in $/100 C.F. as calculated in
paragraph 6
Unit BOD charge is in $/lb BOD from paragraph 4
Unit SS charge is in $/lb SS from paragraph 4
BOD is the average BOD concentration in milligrams per
litR (mg/1) contributed by the extra strength user
during the month
SSE is the average 55 concentration in mg/1 contributed
by &e extra strength user during the month
600 is the normal domestic BOD strength in mg/1 as
defYRed in Article II, Section 2, of the ordinance
SS is the normal domestic SS strength in mg/1 as defined
inNRrticle II, Section 2, of the ordinance
and .0834 is a unit conversion factor.
11%
IIICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOVIES
5
An example user charge calculation for an extra strength user of the
Iowa City treatment works follows:
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOINES
APPENDIX B
TO
USER CHARGE ORDINANCE
This appendix contains a replacement schedule that was developed to
determine the amount of revenue needed to fund the Depreciation,
Extension and Improvement Fund. The replacement schedule lists the
equipment in the treatment works, the estimated dates when the
equipment will have to be replaced, and the estimated cost of
replacement works. Also listed is the estimated cash flow that will
occur in the Replacement Account. The replacement dates and costs
shown are estimates; the actual replacement dates and costs could be
significantly different from those shown. If the actual
replacement expenses differ significantly from those listed in the
replacement schedule, the funding of the Depreciation, Extension
and Improvement Fund Account shall be adjusted accordingly.
REPLACEMENT SCHEDULE
Years From
Treatment
Works In
Operation
Re lacement Account
Replacement Item xpenditure ncomeBalance
611CROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES
June 12 , 1979
The City Council of Iowa City, Iowa, met in regular
session, in the Council Chambers at the Civic Center, Iowa
City, Iowa, at 7:30 o'clock P .M., on the above date.
There were present Mayor Robert�Vevera , in the chair, and
the following named Council Me ers:
John R. Balmer, Clemens Erdahl Mary C Neuhauser,
David Perret, Glenn E. Roberts, Robert A Vevera
Absent: Carol W. deProsse
i
j
I
AHLERS, COONEY. DORWEILER, HAYNIE& SMITH. LAWYERS. DES MOINES. IOWA
lia7
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOIIIES
Council Member Perret introduced the
following Resolution entitled "RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY" and
moved that it be proposed. Council Member Erdahl
seconded the motion. The matter was discussed and the roll
being called, the vote was,
AYES:
j RobQrts. Vey ra Ralmar c 11,1 Nouhal�—
I
I
Perret
NAYS: none
Absent: Erdahl
Whereupon, the Mayor declared the motion adopted and the
4 resolution to have been introduced and proposed as follows:
Res. No. 79-249
RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY
WHEREAS, preliminary plans and specifications and plat
and schedule and estimate of cost are now on file in the
office of the Clerk showing the boundaries of the district,
f I containing the properties and lots to be assessed, locations
I of the improvements, each lot proposed to be assessed,
together with a valuation of each lot as fixed by the
Council, an estimate of the cost of the entire proposed
improvements, stating the cost of each type of construction
and kind of materials to be used, and an estimate of the
amount proposed to be assessed against each lot, for the
i construction of the 1979 Street Improvements (Tanglewood
Street - Ventura Avenue), as hereinafter described, in Iowa
City, Iowa:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE
OF IOWA CITY, IOWA:
That it is deemed desirable, advisable and necessary to
construct the 1979 Street Improvements (Tanglewood Street -
Ventura Avenue), in Iowa City, Iowa.
Said district containing the properties to be assessed
is set out and described in the following "Notice to Property
Owners", set out in this Resolution of Necessity.
Said improvements within said District are located and
described in the following "Notice to Property Owners", set
out in this Resolution of Necessity.
AMLERS. COONEY. OORWEILER. HAYNIEA$MITM. LAWYERS, DES MOINES, IOWA
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 140111ES
W
The method of construction shall be by contract.
Costs of said improvements will be assessed to the
pro-
perties within the boundaries of the district.
shall be assessed more than it is benefited b nents nor more than 258 of its value on the date Noproperty
pits erty
assessment. Said assessment may include a ten the improve -
Default and Deficiency Fund, as authorized by Section 384.44,
Percent
City Code of Iowa,
A plat and schedule and estimate of costs are now on file
in the office of the Clerk as required by law.
Any difference between the a
cash payments made b mount which is derived from
collection period and thepsale ofnStreet ers rImprovementthe rBondsy
totalissued
costagainst
theassessments
improvementsf shat benefited properties and the
proceeds derived from the issuanceaandbe paid or fromds the
authorized b
such other fundscti of o
said gMunicipa.25 litode Of Iowa
for such anally from
Purpose. Y as may be legally used
iBE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this Council meet at
of
�9 o'clock p, M-
1979, >n the Council Chambers inon ethe vidcyCenter,n�e'
I purpose of hearin
interested g property owners subject to assessment and
the rested Parties for or against the improvement, its cost,
or the boundaries of the district. Unless a
owner
thissresolutionsoflth the necessityerk at the time of
deemed to have waived all objections Y, he shall be
egu-
larity of the proceedings and the legality of
to the rial
assessment procedure. Y of usin Special
pecial
iBE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Clerk is hereby
instructed to cause notice to be
required by law of published and mailed as
the pendency of this resolution and of the
time and place of hearing objections thereto, and to the said
preliminary plans and specifications, estimate of costs and
to the making of said improvements- said Notice to be
substantially the following form:
in
1
AMLERS, COONEY, DORWEILER HAYNIE 6 SMITH. LAWYERS DES MOINES, IOWA
IIICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROIAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 1401IIES
a
(Two publications required)
NOTICE TO PROPERTY OWNERS
Notice is hereby given that there is now on file for
public inspection in the office of the Clerk of the City of
Iowa City, Iowa, a proposed Resolution of Necessity, an esti-
mate of costs and plat and schedule showing the amounts pro-
posed to be assessed against each lot and the valuation
thereof within the district as approved by the Council of
Iowa City, Iowa, for a street improvement, designated as the
1979 Street Improvements (Tanglewood Street - Ventura
Avenue), of the types and in the location as follows:
i (Iowa City - 1979 Street Improvements
- Tanglewood Street - Ventura Avenue)
TANGLEWOOD STREET - From 259.16 feet south
Of Ventura Avenue to 180 feet north of Ventura
Avenue. Paving to be seven (7) inch thick
concrete, twenty-five (25) feet wide.with
integral curb.
VENTURA AVENUE - From Tanglewood Street west
I to Dubuque Street. Paving to be seven (7)
inch thick concrete, twenty-five (25) feet
I wide with integral curb.
i
That the proposed district to be benefited and subject to
assessment for the cost of such improvements is described as
follows:
(Iowa City - 1979 Street Improvements
- Tanglewood Street - Ventura Avenue)
All property included within the areas
described so as to include one-half of
the privately owned property between each
such street improved and the next street,
whether such privately owned property
abuts upon the improved street or not.
] In no case shall property situated more
than 300 feet from the improved street be
J assessed.
I The Council will meet at 7:30 o'clock P. M., on the
3rd day of July , 1979, at the Council Chambers in
the Civic Center, I— ow— a y, Iowa, at which time the owners
of property subject to assessment for the proposed improve-
AHLERS. COONEY, DORWEILER. HAYNIE a SMITH. LAWYERS, DEO MOINES. IOWA
FIICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 1401RES
ments, or any other person having an interest in the matter
Tay appear and be heard for or against the making of the
improvement, the boundaries of the district, the cost, the
final assessment against any lot, tract or parcel of land, or the
owner willtbenof a deemedRto°have°waivedeallsity. Aobje ipropertyunless
the time of Nearing he has filed objections with the Clerk.
objections unless at
This Notice is given by authority of the Council Of the
City of Iowa City, Iowa,
lerk of Iowa 1ty, Iowa
(END OF NOTICE)
ANLERS. COONEY. DORWEILER. HAYNIEA SMITH, LAWYERS, DES MOINES. IOWA
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOINES
APPROVED AND PROPOSED at the meeting held on the 12th
3 day of June , 1979.
x
Mayor
ATTEST:
i
Clerk
AHLERS. CCOONEY. DORWEILER. HAYNIE 6 SMITH. LAWYERS. DEB MOINES. IOWA
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS•DES I401NES
Council Member Balmer introduced the following
Resolution entitled "RESOLUTION DIRECTING ENGINEER TO PREPARE
DETAILED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND DIRECTING ATTORNEY TO
PREPARE FORM OF CONTRACT AND NOTICE TO BIDDERS ON THE 1979
STREET IMPROVEMENTS (TANGLEWOOD STREET - VENTURA AVENUE)" and
moved that it be adopted. Council Member Roberts
seconded the motion to adopt. The roll was called and the
vote was,
AYES: Vevera, Balmer, Erdahl, Neuhauser,
Perret, Roberts
NAYS: none
Whereupon, theeMayor declared the following Resolution
duly adopted:
Res. No. 79-250
RESOLUTION DIRECTING ENGINEER TO PREPARE
DETAILED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND
DIRECTING ATTORNEY TO PREPARE FORM OF
CONTRACT AND NOTICE TO BIDDERS ON THE
1979 STREET IMPROVEMENTS (TANGLEWOOD
STREET - VENTURA AVENUE)
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF IOWA CITY,
IOWA:
That Eugene A. Dietz, P.E. (City Engineer) is hereby
ordered and directed to prepare and file with the Clerk
detailed plans and specifications for the construction of the
1979 Street Improvements (Tanglewood Street - Ventura Avenue).
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Attorney is hereby
ordered and directed to prepare and file with the Clerk a
Notice to Bidders and form of contract for the construction of
the 1979 Street Improvements (Tanglewood Street - Ventura
Avenue).
PASSED AND APPROVED this 12th day of June ,
1979.
Mayor
u
Attes : City Clerk
A HLERS, COONEY• DORWEILER• HAYNIE& SMITH, LAWYERS, DES MOINES. IOWA
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOIIIES
W
City of Iowa City
MEMORANDUM
Date: June 6, 1979
To: City Council
From: Eugene A. Dietz, City Engineer w�_'
Re: Tanglewood/Ventura Special Assessment Project
Attached for your information is a copy of a letter which was sent to
Mr. and Mrs. Jensen who reside at 2050 N. Dubuque Street and are prop-
erty owners affected by the Tangleassessment
wood/Ventura special
Project. At an informal Council meeting several weeks ago, Council
asked that staff try to work out an arrangement with Mr. and Mrs.
Jensen regarding their assessment. This letter was an attempt to do so.
As you can see from the attached letter, the assessment was reduced from
$9,049.62 to $6,370.00. This represents a reduction of approximately
30%.
On May 31, the City Manager and I met with Mr. and Mrs. Jensen in their
home to discuss this letter. Although they agreed that the information
contained in the letter was possible, and that in the long run may be
desirable, they felt that they would never subdivide their property and
theiwould
assessmentsee no efor thisfit to projectis shouldbezero
enother words, they feel that
The end result of the letter and subsequent discussion with Mr. and Mrs.
Jensen is that no compromise resulting in any special assessment what-
ever can be obtained. The burden of this judgment will now rest with
the City Council to determine the ultimate assessment for this project.
As discussed in prior memos, you have the right and authority to levy an
assessment for the original amount of $9,049,62 or the reduced assess-
ment at $6,370.00, a zero assessment, or anything in between. The
Council agenda for June 12 contains an item setting a public hearing for
this project on July 3, 1979. At that meeting, you will be asked to
provide an answer to this question and set assessment for the Jensen
property. In the interim if you have further questions regarding this
matter I will be happy to answer them at your early convenience. If
Council desires that this project be done during this construction year,
it is absolutely imperative that the most timely sequence of events be
followed.
jm3/8
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 140111CS
1199
May 7, 1979
Mr. and Mrs. Aage Jensen
2050 N: Dubuque St.
Iowa City, Iowa 52240
Re: Ventura/Tanglewood Special Assessment Project
Dear Mr. & Mrs. Jensen:
Attached for your review and consideration is a sketch depicting a
hypothetical subdivision of your existing lot. As you will recall, the
City Engineer was given the assignment by City Council of determining if
it would be possible to subdivide your property to determine a "benefit"
from this project. We are not implying that you intend to create such a
subdivision. However, the proposal was prepared to demonstrate that it
is possible to subdivide your lot within the guidelines of present City
ordinances.
I would ask that you review this information carefully. After your
review, please give me a call so that we may meet to discuss this in
more detail.
The attached sketch and accompanying information will have the effect of
reducing your assessment for this project. While the City staff feels
that it would be legal to assess the entire amount against your prop-
erty, it obviously is more equitable to discuss the reduced assessment
of $6,370 as indicated on the sketch.
I look forward to meeting with you in the near future.
Sincerely yours,
Neal G. Berlin
City Manager
Enc.
bj
cc: Gene Dietz
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS•DES IdOIRES
III
RIA ZONING REQUIREMENTS
AVAILABLE
- Minimum Area ----------------10,000 Sq. Ft.
19,500
- Minimum Frontage ----------------40 Ft.
95
- Buildable Width -----------------80 Ft.
95
- Front & Rear Yard Depth ---------30 Ft. Front
- 127 Rear - 40
- Side Yard ------------------------8 Ft.
9
- Jensen's Total Assessment = $9,049.62
- Average Assessment = $60/ft. frontage
- Lot "B" Assessment = 95' x $60/ft. = $5,700
- Lot "A" Assessment = 20% ($9,049 - 5,7-0-OT—
= .2(3,349)
= 669.80 or $670
Total Proposed Assessment (Lots "A" & "B")
$5,700 + $670
= $6,370
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOITIES
3.2%
:50,
ORDINANCE N0, 79-2957
AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING THE CENTERLINE GRADE OF HEINZ ROAD
EXTENDED FROM THE NORTH END OF EXISTING PAVEMENT NORTHWESTERLY 780
FEET IN IOWA CITY, IOWA.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF IOWA CITY, IOWA:
Section 1. PURPOSE. The purpose of this ordinance is to establish
the center line grade of Heinz Road extended from the north end of
existing pavement northwesterly 780 feet in Iowa City, Iowa.
Section 2. ENACTMENT. The elevation in feet above the City Datum
plane is established for Heinz Road extended from the north end of
existing pavement (the south line of Lot 6, Auditor's plat 32, Iowa
City, Johnson County, Iowa) northwesterly 780 feet as follows:
Reference points are as follows:
1. Station 0+00 is at the north end of the existing pavement (the
south line of said lot 6). Stationing along the extension of
Heinz Road increases to the north measured in feet.
2. Top of Portland cement concrete pavement at the centerline at
station 0+00 equals 84.77 (feet) City.
Elevations shown below are to the top of the proposed pavement at
the centerline. The elevations listed below are continuous from
station to station except along the vertical curve where the slope
of the top of the pavement changes uniformly.
Station Description Elevation
0+00 End of existing pavement and 84.77
beginning of proposed pavement
0+62 Beginning of vertical curve 82.51
1+37 Center of vertical curve 80.30
2+12 End of vertical curve 80.16
7+80 End of proposed pavement 83.00
Section 3. REPEALER. All ordinances and parts of ordinances in
conflict with the provision of this ordinance are hereby repealed.
Section 4. SEVERABILITY. If any section, provision or part of the
Ordinance shall be adjudged to be invalid or unconstitutional, such
ajudication 'shall not affect the validity of the Ordinance as a
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS•DES I4011jEs
1ao3
r) !
ORDINANCE NO. 79-2957
PAGE 2
whole or any section, provision or part thereof not adjudged invalid
or unconstitutional.
Section S. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall be in effect after
its final passage, approval and publication as required by law.
Passed and approved this 12th day of June, 1979.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK;
RECEI77D d APF$O;TD
BY TU' LEGAL
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOINES
ORDINANCE NO"79-2957
PAGE 3
It was moved by Balmer and seconded by Neuhauser
that the Ordinance as read be adopted and upon roll calT there were:
AYES: NAYS: ABSENT:
x BALMER
X dePROSSE
_x ERDAHL
x NEUHAUSER
x PERRET
_x ROBERTS
x VEVERA
Moved by Balmer, seconded by Neuhasuser, that the rule requiring
ordinances to be considered and voted on for passage at two Council
meetings prior to the meeting at which it is to be finally passed
be suspended, the first and second consideration and vote be waived,
and the ordinance be voted upon for final passage at this time.
Ayes: Perret, Roberts, Vevera, Balmer, Erdahl, Neuhauser. Nays:
none. Absent: deProsse. Motion carried, 6/0.
Date of publication June 20, 1979
i
i
i
i
t
i
MICROFILMED BY
DORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS•DES MOINES
L.. T
' SpM .Idm,..t SLpr I`I 41 :i
/ \ Ilnn.'411' IlallprY PF \I ::
14i n,nrl11 MI I
If
I-I'I nl
SHIVE-HATTERY & ASSOCIATES INIV/,11
1 r.nxnl 16tl4ub I'I
AINn 11 IlAnr PI
CONSULT/NQ ENQ/NEER8 I �'r'r � I I.ryxr. rrr I.1
INA..I I. 1rr'll„ rl
I V/Illl.illl 11 '; /„ I1
IIIIH IWAI' I..I :ul 1'11 Wr. I11'rll In.,rv.l vna••I rl
IA., ru•il v.rrr.n mn• L1
d 1W/y CH l 5', II IWq ',; •;'•lU � •'x, Ynn.n. I• I
' III11'IU qJI I11'113h41b4p I1 Il. r•.. I•I
I,rryl rA'a•Lr, rl
! Lv+ll I'I,...nr I.1
x•n.r41I Ilunnn•. I •,
I,_0f,1 2u..I... I :.
U.nrl 11 (,r.nnvr 1'I
,lune 7, 1979
i Mr. Gene Dietz, P,E. Re: 1979 BDI Second Addition
City Engineer
City Hall Improvements
Iowa City, Iowa 52240
Dear Gene:
We have checked the bids received and find them in order except for some minor ir-
regularities on the bid from Cedar Hills Construction. They did not acknowledge
receipt of Addendum N1, and the unit prices for Items lb, and ic. of their bid
were not filled in.
We called the contractor and confirmed that 1) he had received Addendum N1 because
it was bound in the specification book and 2) that the "total prices" shown on his
bid were correct and that unit prices could be computed for use in making periodic
payments.
jOur recommendations are as follows:
I
I1
PART A
We have examined the bid documents submitted for this project and have determined
that Cedar Hills Construction of R. R. y2, Oxford, Iowa, is the low bidder and has
complied with the specifications except for the minor irregularities as noted above.
Don Morelock, President of Cedar Hills Construction, started this company a few
months ago after leaving United Contractors, Inc.; Mr. Morelock was the superinten-
dent on thebox culvert project at Court and Muscatine in Iowa City. Mr. Morelock
stated that he can past the required performance bond and will obtain it from the
Keith B. Merrill Agency
Des
minor irregularities in thebidMandeIowa. waive he
awardthe contract Mindthe aamount Cofy$28,794-58
l
! to Cedar Hills Construction.
PART B
We have examined the bid documents for this project and have determined that Metro
Pavers, Inc., is the low bidder and has complied with the specifications. Metro
Pavers, Inc., is an experienced contractor who has worked In Iowa City for many years.
We recommend award of the contract in the amount of $41,718.00
_ I
°Y./^•:•!••IL', L!•IENLOIiT Uf:S MOINES DI1f311OUf` FT MADISON IOWA 01 TY VINTON
I
i
i
i
I
I
I
I
I Idol
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES 1'IOIIIES
0
Mr. Gene Dietz, P.E.
June 7, 1979
Page Two
PART C
We have examined the bid documents submitted for this project and have determined
that Parkview Company is the low bidder and has complied with the specifications.
Parkview Company is an experienced contractor who has worked in Iowa City for many
years. We recommend award of the contract in the base bid amount of $199,265.00.
The total construction cost for this project as tabulated below is within the esti-
mate shown on the preliminary assessment plat and schedule:
Construction Engineer's Estimate Low Bid Price
Part A - Box Culvert $ 29,450.00 $ 28,794.58
Part B - Pavement and Storm Sewer $ 49,684.00
$ 41,718.00
Part C - Sanitary Sewer, Lift
Station Modifications, Earthwork,
and Erosion Control $188,595.00 $199,265.00
Deductive Alternate 0
3 000.00)
TOTALS $267,729.00
$266,717.56
Copies of the bid tabulation will be forwarded to you and all bidders in a few days.
If you have any questions, please call.
Very truly yours,
SHIVE!-H-HAATTERY & ASSOCIATES
n L. Willers`
JLW:sd
SHIVE•HATTERY 6 ASSOCIATES
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES ROPIES
W
0
W
i O
(L
W
Q
O
I
0
O
u\
r•�
0
0
W
'
O
O W
u >
C',
Z U
J•
o
O
0
o
Z U
3
u\
u
O
W �
O
O
D
u\
X a
N
_
o
cN
m u u
f- Q
O —
m
W
nu
v
L
wo
N
N
U -
c c
m
c
;
O
O
O
O
p
m
O
Q
u
m
0o
00
O
w
F U
ow
C C
V
Z—
a.
O
t
m
W
K a
O
c vl
u
a
N
W
S3
�
O
U
O
O
u
N
N
S a
0
0
0
Y
U
W
m
o
vs
O W
O
o
ti
u
U
u
K O
U
p•
Z
W
V7
N
C
O
Q O
~
�¢
Xa
N
u
c
L u
W
K
m 'O 3
N
n
a^p
o
O
0
0
a)
c
o
0
u y_
®
o
r
m
m L y
F
0
0
nu v
u>
U
Z�
u
u1
N
m
M
a
�
-gym
00
N
D:
r ut O
ul
O O
•L
o
:D
N
N
k u
J
C.
O
O
U
W
OW
c
c m
>
ZU
O
N
v
7>
o
W K
S
_
v
y
Ol
m m
L p
u ucic
X a
N
¢ ¢
W
ti
N
O
_
m
U •� ^
K T
C
p
O
O
mr1-
pl
O
01
•. N U
Z
S
W
_
_
u
Q
�0 m
s
m
jD
N
N
N -
a
N
N
CL
Ln
M
NI
0
O
u\
O
O
W
'
O
O W
u >
C',
Z U
O
W a:
0
o
a
X
3
u\
O
O
c C
W
u n
D
u\
L C
9
dm ^
C
cN
m u u
f- Q
S
m
F, W
nu
v
—U
wo
L N
m
d
;
a
O
E O
m
O
Q
u\
O
u
w
ow
tm
Z U
W
K a
O
u
u
u
al
W
m
O
O
U
O
O
u
O
9
S a
v
r W
C O
Y
U
m
o
vs
O d
;o i+
U7
ti
u
r
u
K O
U
p•
0
O
u\
O
O
O
N
O
N
N N
C',
O
O
a0
u\
o
OO
O
u\
O
o
c C
o
s
D
u\
c+0
O
^
cN
W
f- Q
S
M
M
N
a0
N
wo
N
N
VT
a
O
m
O
Q
u\
z
m
O
W
u
u
c
c x
O
O
O
O
O
O
u
O
�
m
`
m
m
vs
CL
U7
ti
v.
r
u
m
V-
p•
Z
C
O
Q O
~
W
O
O
U
u
c
L u
O
K
o
a m
m
_
O
a
O
Z
p
O,
r
m
wr
h
N
N
N N
C',
O
O
a0
u\
o
OO
O
u\
O
o
c C
o
s
D
u\
c+0
T
r
0
W
f- Q
S
J
u
N
a0
N
wo
N
N
VT
H
N
m
O
Q
u\
z
m
O
W
u
u
c
c x
W
N
u
O
m
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES tI0111ES
7
N
N N
0
O
O
OO
O
O
C
c C
�z
r
r
0
W
f- Q
J
u
N
wo
m
O
Q
z
m
O
W
u
u
c
c x
W
u
O
m
`
m
vs
CL
U7
ti
v.
r
u
m
V-
p•
Z
C
O
Q O
~
W
O
O
U
u
c
L u
O
K
o
a m
m
O
O
O
Z
p
O,
r
m
¢
F_
H
—
m
u>
u1
N
O
cr
�
m m
00
z
D:
U
>
O O
•L
o
:D
V)
J
k u
J
N W U
r
Z
U
W
c
c m
>
¢
W
0v
o
m m
u^
y
p
m m
u=
u ucic
3
W
¢ ¢
m
¢
f7
Z
m
W
m
d
u
Q
S
r
a-
N
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES tI0111ES
7
N
N N
0
O
O
OO
O
O
m
O
0
W
O
N
m
O
Q
vs
in
ti
v.
W
~
O
O
O
O
O
M
O
O
O
O
Z
^
O
^
u1
N
O
�
o
N
N
V1
V1
U1
N
}
Q
3
f7
S
N
N
N
N
N
w
r
Q
U
N
Q
N lR
UI
N
Vf
N
cts
t
r
z
Y u
u
LL
u
>
U W
W
J
W
w
�o
N
F
00
N
z
i
O
z
r
x
W
E!
u
o
ui
s
m
u
—
r
v
m
01
m
Vrl
O
a
V7
m
L
u
c
z
V
d
O
Vrl
W
O
L
Y
m
O
u
m
K
m
m
u
m
W
u
m
w
u
a
c¢
r
c
~
z
E u
al
m
o
w
O.
N -0
c
>
u\
r
w-
m
z
op
o�
m
a 3
u
u
N
K
m
N
Fla
s
m
m
m
a
u
a
N
a
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES tI0111ES
7
51
W.
0
N
W
0
Q
a
i
j N
a
m
0
0
Z
I _O
Q
J
i
;
i
c
v
O
La
E
c
o
;
f O
lT
au
C U
U
m
O
w
u
W Q:
m O
Ql T
�
n u
•-
u
i
w
0
m
a
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOIRES
ti
N
6
f
C
O
IT
N
N
N
Q
3
0
U
a
3
a
O
U)
0
O
m
0
a
O
I
w
Q
0:
F -
w
w
F -
Z
co
}
3
x
0
S
N
w
Q
U
O
N
N
a
of
1-
Y
Q
L
C
n
a
u
W Q:
O.
u p
X
_
L —
(yJ
N
V�
N
Vl
IR
Vf
N
N
N
N
N
[ U
a
C C
C
7 U
m
I V
>
O .E
m
(.
C N
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
W
O
O
O
O
O
o
O
O
O
O
O
0 W
M
O
o
Z=0c0
Q01
N
0
a
10
000
UOi
M
W a'
S
�
cl
M
�O
N
1�
CO
CO
�'
C>
X
O
N
N
M
Ol
N
m a i
W
K
N
N
N
V�
v
N
N
Vl
Vl
Vl
d— 0
a
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
O
O
u 1F •
m
W
U1
01
M
O
O
N
O t\
N
O
N
t_ U
•-
M
n
n
u m
a
�N
M
m0
L O 7
dP
I••' N m
�
N
N
N
V'
K
N
N
V}
N
N
yf
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
ui
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
L
ow
O
U
Z
S
I�O
O
O
O
U\
O
U\
w Fe
N
0D
N
S
IO
N
'N
X (L
L O
W
N
VF
VI
V1
N
N
N
VI
Vf
N
ut
o >
a
U •-
C
u\
N
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
N
u
a00
O
N
N
O
O
O
O
U\
O
N
~
S
ut U
a
L)
cn
%0
N
mm3
m
as
a o
a
N
V}
N
VT
1A
N
N
YI
N
N
V1
W
O W
U
"z m
-
r-- a
0 i
x
VI N O W
N
N
N
N
N
UT
N
VF
N
V1
K
L C
a
> > >
O
F
CL
-U
u
m
m
7
NN 3
O.
m 1 O
di
r-
0
W
u
U
Z
Li ir
U
a
O
x
u
.vc
W
ur
vt
vt
u.
ur
us
yr
u.
ur
N
u
0
0
a
C-4
W
•
C •�
4-
— U
m c� O
u
j O:
~
4
A) X
m
W r
W
U
U
U
IL W
C
>.
Qt
U. J
11
W
W
W
J J
F
V1
~
OU
J O
J
N
�•
S O
O
J
O
W
_Z
j- Q
z
O N 0
a
V)
O
QN M
W a
N
a
L
m
o
u
v
o
av
rn• m
c o
L
W
N
c c
c
L
1
'N
0Cw
'0
O
z
._ c
>
Wl—
o
u
0
m .+ o
•-
u
V)
u
v u
'x
u m
a L
v
v a v -
— --
u
m¢
W
OZ
_
W
•- d '- L
v 0 m
t
a V-
lL
L d
O
F
w
d d N
0
u cin
U •-
0
m
L
a
W L
Q
v m
m
}
v
v
v
0 v
c w
Q
it
U
K
m U1
v
0
m O
ut
0 1 L
u
w
VI 1..
m
.�
N
•_ ut
z
N
Q
N -
vl
X
L
c z
U U
0 3✓
L
a
0
U
a
U
WO
W
1"
00 N
c
i
C c
U=
O c
m
m 0
G
U
O
m'
z
1O
00
N m L
W S
U W>
u
d .N-
w
ua
O
11
K
m L
U
a
m
Y-
T
t .-
•-�
Y
z
a
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOIRES
ti
N
6
f
C
O
IT
N
N
N
Q
3
0
U
a
3
a
O
U)
0
O
m
0
a
O
I
w
Q
0:
F -
w
w
F -
Z
co
}
3
x
0
S
N
w
Q
U
O
N
N
a
of
1-
Y
Q
L
C
n
L.
I
u
c
W
E
O
L
CL
E
C
O m
v
Q T
c u
u m
N O
m O
O� T
�U
r
u
w
K
m
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES I4011JES
U
J
"m
tWa
W
N
N
N
N
h
N
O
L
U ^
A or=
U
NIr
�a
L
x 3
O,
O
o
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
o
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
W
o
0
O W
S
O
O
O
O
C)
O
O
O
O
z V00
N
O
N
S
O
O
O W
Lu Cr
iL
N
N
Ul
U1
t\
00
cQ
K
o
N
•> m
w
N
N
Vf
VI
V1
N
Ul
V�
V�
N
a o0
O
0
O
G
W
p
O
O
O
O
O
O
N
N
N
m L N
r U
N
n
U\
M
.O
ut (9 ;
7
U\
-�
a
N
Lo ]
r ul O
1?
UY
N
V}
N
N
V�
Vf
N
N
O
p
p
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
W
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
z V
ul
O
O
O
O
Ul
S
S
N
O
U
W Er
00
Op
M
N
U\
n
O\
M
10
O
v
- m
•L
ra.
S
s
m
S
o
m
O
x
W
0)
IR
VT
Vf
V1'
N
V1
VF
N
VI
N
O
O
O
O
O
O
ul
O>
U1
O
O
O
O
O
U1I
n
n
N
W� T
3N
W
n
N
N
S
N
I..,,
U
.-.
O
M
O
N
>
z
�
a'
te
N
Ol
um 3
n.
mr�0
y N
N
N
VF
N
OF
N
N
N
N
N
17
WW
O
y
z V
u>
wa
I- (L
_Q;
x
O
W
N
N
N
Ih
VT N
N
N
N
N
V1
L C
r
a0-
~U
Ov1 U
zir
=
N N 3
a
_
N
N
N
vF
N N
of
VI
N
u)
0
w
u
ow
z
u
w 0:
F a
x
UW
N
N
N
N
N N
N
N
N
N
m
� O
_
I -U
cv
Lmzo�a
z-
°
r
y�
U K O
IR
Ih
UT
OF
N
N
N
N
N
H
o
N
u v u u r v c r i r
w }.
r I
J J W W V J H U U U
ar
O O U\ O 0 0 O
0
Of
z
ra
N S N N O
Ln
W
O
VO
M S
O
u
C N
m
L y -
N W
L w
w
Col
W C
O
L O N
•m
w 0 w L
K] C C
U u
in
zp
L Uf L U O d
CO
c
O
o L W� 4 C u 4.
•� N O c O
0 U
}
T
W W u L u m u in m Y u E rn
cl
r
Q N U W N U N •- > 0 c Z •- K m Y C
Q
D:
f- m J W O W W z m W O U L O > C
K
U
�n u C 0 c > L> c U z> u ._ c W 3 m m
U a- T
M
]
y
.- ._ — c— c U a._ u W u x
X E - m
m- m m m m O •- in L ._ m L m r
LL J U r S W W W 3
Q
W
a
00 Z w L > i> u p Q O
G
V)
- w
S
m d U 9 W u- Qt m U
O
N M
z ID
f
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES I4011JES
oL
d
9
Fw
- U
Z �
�a
� W
U
Z �
� n.
p
w
p W
Z U
W �
F- n.
x
w
N
N
F- 1-
v 1/t N N
u
U
¢
In
�Z
�
0
N N
N N
p
w
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
p w
U
0 0
o �
0
on
UJ
m
N N
D
VF N
N N
W U
'"
0
0
0
0
0
0
N
O
O
~
n
O
U)
¢
L I
c
0
0
0
'31
0
0 0
0
•N
0
0
o
N
ui
N
N
m
N
N
d'
N N
O VI .L
O
N
O
O
O
O
-
^
O
0
N N
M
Z
N
N
N
N
�
- U °.
O
N
?
O In C
O>
m
N _
dO
d W
O
Lf
J
U
-.-
-
m
N
N
.0-.-
N
•u
N
(/• y
yl
O1
I
I
N N In N
p
N
N
N Q N
�
N
T
•J
U
N� LI L
c N 7 0
W
H
IL
N
N
W
a
a
F
�
N
t/Y
N
N
UI VI
Fw
- U
Z �
�a
� W
U
Z �
� n.
p
w
p W
Z U
W �
F- n.
x
w
N
N
F- 1-
�
u
U
¢
In
�Z
�
0
�
J
F. Q
O
W
O
W U
'"
W
~
U)
¢
L I
c
- u
•N
LLI
K
O
L u V
LL
..•
d'
J
O VI .L
C 10
-
p•
.j
F- y
N N
u
Z
O
�
- U °.
O
N
?
O In C
O>
m
N _
dO
d W
O
Lf
J
U
-.-
-
m
.0-.-
•u
W
L
O1
I
I
N N In N
p
N
N
N Q N
�
N
T
•J
U
N� LI L
c N 7 0
W
H
IL
W
a
a
F
�
MICROFILMED BY
JORM MICROLAB
CEDAR RAPIDS -DES MOIIIES
I
00